DETECTING TELOMERASE ACTIVITY

Abstract: A method for detecting telomerase activity in a sample, which comprises treating the sample with a solid phase under conditions to bind telomerase to the solid phase, separating the solid phase from the treated sample to form a test sample which is optionally treated to elute bound telomerase from the solid phase, and assaying the test sample for telomerase activity.

Description: DETECTING TELOMERASE ACTIVITY FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method for detecting telomerase activity in a sample, and to the use of a solid phase for detecting telomerase activity in a sample. The invention also relates to a kit for detecting telomerase activity in a sample. BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION Telomeres Telomeres are the specialised ends of all eukaryotic chromosomes that serves as protective caps preventing the chromosomes from fusing together and causing DNA rearrangements that can lead to karyotypic changes and genomic instability (Mϋller, 1938; McClintock, 1941). The term "telomere" was coined by Mϋller from the Greek words for "end" (telos) and "part" (meros). The regulatory role for telomeres in cell proliferation was postulated when it was realised that the ends of linear DNA molecules could not be replicated by any known DNA polymerases (Watson, 1972; Olovnikov, 1973). Olovnikov (1973) proposed that loss of telomeric DNA would occur with cell division and ultimately cause loss of genes essential for growth. It has later been shown that telomeres are in a dynamic state of equilibrium between shortening and stabilisation of lengthening (Greider and Blackburn, 1987; Morin, 1989). Figure 1 presents a model describing the inverse relationship between telomere length and replicative age. As telomeres shorten they will reach a critical length, which signals cell cycle arrest and initiates a senescence program. This point (Ml) represents the limit of replicative lifespan, initially described by Hayflick (1965) for human cultured fibroblasts. This property has later been documented for a variety of other cell types growing in vitro or in vivo (reviewed by Harley, 1995). If a cell bypasses Ml (Hayflick limit), for example by oncogenic transformation, then its telomeres continue to shorten until a second point is reached (M2), termed crisis, where massive cell death occurs, perhaps because of chromosome inviability due to impaired telomere function. For cells to emerge from this crisis, activation of the telomere maintenance machinery, including telomerase, is needed so that telomere length and structure can be restored and maintained. The cells that emerge from M2 can divide indefinitely. Harley (1991) equated this loss of telomeric DNA with a clock that monitors the number of times a cell has divided and ultimately limits the process of division. In nearly all eukaryotes, telomeres are complexes of G rich simple repeated DNA and of proteins that specifically bind to it. Table A shows some eukaryotic organisms in which telomerase activity has been identified and the RNA component of telomerase identified and cloned (reviewed by Greider, 1996). The telomere sequence of each organism is shown in 5'- 3' direction, as is the sequence of the template region of the telomerase RNA. Size (nt) indicates the length of the RNAs in nucleotides. Human telomeres can contain up to 20 kb of tandem repeats of the hexamer TTAGGG (Moyzis et ah, 1988). Table A Telomerase RNA components Organism Telomere sequence RNA template sequence Size (nt) Tetrahymena TTGGGG CAACCCCAA 159 Euplotes TTTTGGGG CAAAACCCCAAAACC 190 Oxytricha TTTTGGGG CAAAACCCCAAAACC 190 Human TTAGGG CUAACCCUAAC 450 Mouse TTAGGG CCUAACCCU 450 Saccharomyces (TG)ι. 3 CACCACACCCACACAC ~ 1300 cerevisiae Kluyveromyces TTTGATTAGGTATG- UCAAAUCCGUACACCAC -1300 lactis TGGTGTACGGA AUACCUAAUCAAA The end-replication problem Conventional DNA polymerases can not start DNA synthesis de novo and can only replicate DNA in the 5'- 3' direction. Replication of the eukaryotic chromosomal DNA molecules is typically primed by an 8- to 12-base stretch of RNA. This mechanism suffices for all but the very ends of the chromosome. Removal of the terminal RNA primer is expected to generate a small gap at the 5 'ends of newly replicated lagging strands that can not be repaired by a conventional DNA polymerase. Hence, in the absence of a specialised replication mechanism, a given DNA end is expected to lose 8-12 basepairs in every other S phase (Zakian, 1997). The rate of DNA loss will be even faster if there is degradation or if the terminal RNA primer is not laid down at the very end of the DNA molecule; and actually telomere shortening has been shown to be in the range of 50 to 100 base pairs per cell generation (Harley et ah, 1990; Counter et ah, 1992; Vaziri et al., 1994). Telomerase There are multiple solutions to the problem of replication of DNA ends. For example, protein priming, terminal hairpins, and/or recombination are used for replication of certain viral and plasmid genomes in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. However, most eukaryotes from single- celled organisms to higher plants and animals, including humans (reviewed in Greider, 1996), employ telomerase for replicating the chromosome ends. Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein (Greider and Blackburn, 1987; Morin, 1989) whose RNA and protein components are both essential for the synthesis of telomeric DNA. Telomerase RNA contains an 8- to 30-base segment that serves as template (Table A) for elongation of the 3' overhang that remains after removal of the terminal RNA primer. Telomerase generates tandem repeats of the short sequence encoded by telomerase RNA as shown in Figure 2 (associated protein components are not shown). In (a) the 3' end of the chromosome aligns near the 3' end of the template region of the RNA. The entire template region is complementary to -1.5 repeats of the human telomerase sequence (Table A). In (b) telomere extension proceeds to the 5' end of the template region. In (c) telomerase can translocate to begin another round of telomere synthesis (adapted from Harley and Nillenponteau, 1995). After telomerase elongation of the 3' strand, a conventional DΝA polymerase probably synthesises the complementary strand. Telomerase activity was first characterised biochemically for Tetrahymena, a ciliated protozoa, by Greider and Blackburn in 1985. As the structures of all characterised telomeres are very similar, Greider and Blackburn (1985) proposed that there has to be a common mode of telomere replication in all eukaryotes. Four years later, this proposal was supported when a very similar biochemical activity was identified in the immortal human HeLa cell line (Morin, 1989). Cloning of the RΝA component of Tetrahymena telomerase (Greider and Blackburn, 1989) clarified several aspects of the mechanism of action of this novel DΝA polymerase. The predicted template region of the Tetrahymena RΝA component is complementary to 1.5 repeats of the telomere sequence (Table A), a result that was confirmed by the demonstration that mutations in this region led to the predicted alterations in telomere sequence when the mutated RNA was overexpressed in vivo (Yu et al., 1990). Many properties of the Tetrahymena enzyme are shared by enzymes isolated from other sources, which makes this a valuable model organism. Telomerase preferentially binds to and elongates telomeric sequence primers over nontelomeric sequences. However, telomere-like sequences other than the cognate telomere repeats will serve as efficient primers (Greider and Blackburn, 1987). Thus telomerase extracted from Tetrahymena will elongate primers consisting of the telomere repeat from organisms as different as ciliates, humans, plants and yeast. This property of telomerase parallels the ability of telomeres from different organisms to function in yeast (Szostak and Blackburn, 1982; Pluta et al., 1984). The ability of telomerase to preferentially elongate telomeric primers without specificity for an unique sequence suggests that telomerase has a general affinity for G-rich oligonucleotide sequences (Lee and Blackburn, 1993; Morin, 1991; Harrington and Greider, 1991; Collins and Greider, 1993), which differ from the high-affinity sequence-specific recognition of many DNA and RNA binding proteins. Expression of telomerase Telomerase activity has been detected at low level in normal peripheral blood cells and in normal bone marrow (Counter et al, 1995; Broccoli et al., 1995; Hiyama, K. et al., 1995; Weng et al., 1996; Hohaus et al, 1997). Subsequent studies have more clearly defined the cellular source. Telomerase is not detected in mature neutrophiles but B- and T-lymphocytes have activity. Unfractionated mononuclear cells from normal bone marrow also express telomerase activity, usually at the same level as peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Fractionation of bone marrow cells has revealed that a low level of activity is present in stem cells (CD38 + , CD38 " ), and that the activity increases in more mature precursor cells (CD347CD717CD38 + ) and declines again in maturing CD34 ' cells (Engelhardt et al., 1997). Testes and ovaries have also been shown to express telomerase activity (Kim et al., 1994; Wright et al., 1996). It is therefore reason to believe that stem cells generally will show some telomerase activity like demonstrated for the basal cells and stem cells of the skin (Taylor et al., 1996; Harle-Bachor et al., 1996; Yasumoto et al, 1996; Ramierez et al., 1997), intestinal crypt cells (Hiyama, E. et al., 1996a), endometrium in premenopausal women (Kyo et al., 1997; Brien et al., 1997) and proliferating endothelial cells (Hsiao et al., 1997). Telomerase activity is repressed when inducing differentiation of immortal cells (Holt et al., 1996b; Sharma et al, 1995; Bestilny et al, 1996; Xu et al, 1996; Asai et al, 1998). This leads to the working hypothesis that there are at least two pathways for the repression of telomerase activity (Holt et al, 1996a). One pathway represses telomerase in most somatic tissues late in development (Wright et al., 1996). These somatic cells, representing the vast majority of the cells in the body, do not express telomerase activity regardless of their proliferative state. The remaining cells in the body are telomerase competent. The second pathway reversibly regulates the telomerase activity so that it is present during cell proliferation and repressed during periods of quiescence. This model explains a variety of otherwise confusing results; telomerase activity is found in testis and ovary, while it is absent in sperm and oocytes, present in early embryogenesis, but decreases during development of the fetus and is absent in most tissues in the new-born baby (Wright et al., 1996). The low activity in the most primitive stem cells compared to the more mature cells (Counter et al., 1995; Hiyama K. et al., 1995) is another phenomenon that can be explained from the second pathway. However, most of these cells are in a quiescent state, and their proliferating progeny express higher levels of telomerase activity (Wright et al, 1996). Telomere length and telomerase activity were also found to be closely regulated in the course of B cell differentiation (Weng et al, 1997b). In contrast to previously characterised models of telomere shortening during somatic cell division, telomeres are significantly longer in germinal centre B cells than in either precursor naive or descendant memory B cells. Telomerase activity was markedly increased in germinal centre B cells relative to other B cell populations, correlating with increased telomere length (Weng et al, 1997b). High levels of telomerase activity are induced in naive and memory B cells by in vitro activation. These results suggest that telomerase may play a critical role in immune responses by elongating telomeres and thus preserving the replicative lifespan of germinal centre and progeny memory B cells. Expression of the RNA component of telomerase It has been shown that the human telomerase RNA component (hTR) is expressed at detectable levels in normal somatic cells, even though most of these cells have no detectable telomerase activity (Feng et al, 1995). However, the parallels observed between up-regulated telomerase activity and up-regulated hTR expression, both during T cell development and during in vitro T cell activation, suggest that regulation of hTR levels may contribute to the overall regulation of telomerase activity in normal somatic cells such as lymphocytes (Weng et al., 1997a). Expression of hTR may be necessary but not sufficient for telomerase activity, and the absence of telomerase activity in resting lymphocytes with detectable levels of hTR may reflect the failure to express sufficient levels of one or more of the other telomerase components or the presence of a dominant mechanism to repress telomerase in these cells (Weng et α ., 1997a). The catalytic subunit and other telomerase associated proteins All immortalised human cell lines examined to date contain either telomerase activity or evidence of an alternative mechanism for lengthening of telomeres (Bryan et al., 1997). This represents very strong circumstantial evidence for the importance of telomere maintenance in immortalisation. The catalytic subunit of telomerase, hTERT (human telomerase reverse transcriptase, initially abbreviated hTRT, hEST2, hTCSl or TP2), was recently identified and cloned (Nakamura et al., 1997; Meyerson et al., 1997; Kilian et al, 1997). The gene coding for hTERT is present in a single copy in the human genome but is expressed in a complex splicing pattern. In addition to transcription control of the hTERT gene, alternative splicing of the telomerase catalytic subunit may be important for the regulation of telomerase activity and may give rise to proteins with different biochemical functions (Kilian et al, 1997; Ulaner et al, 1998). Expression of hTERT positively correlates with the known telomerase status of tissues and cell lines and occurs preferentially in cell lines in vitro after the cells have undergone crisis, in normal tissues with a significant stem cell component and in a range of tumours (Nakamura et al, 1997; Meyerson et al, 1997; Kilian et al, 1997; Kolquist et al, 1998; Kanaya et al, 1998). These findings define an important component of the human telomerase complex and implicate its expression as the major determinant of the distribution of telomerase activity in mammalian cells. The importance ι_u mn i ω u«uuωuω.u amino acid changes in conserved telomerase specific and reverse transcriptase (RT) motifs reduce or abolish telomerase activity (Weinxich et al, 1997). Furthermore, transfection experiments indicate that hTERT is the limiting factor for the activation of telomerase in normal diploid cells (Weinrich et al, 1997; Bodnar et al, 1998; Vaziri and Benchimol, 1998). It was recently shown that hTERT mRNA is present in specific subsets of some normal, telomerase negative tissues thought to have long term proliferative capacity, but the level may not signify a level of telomerase that is above the threshold required for telomere maintenance or elongation (Kolquist et al, 1998). While the RT-like telomerase proteins are involved in catalysis, additional proteins such as telomere- and telomerase associated proteins are required for full telomerase assembly, function and regulation. Two protein subunits have been identified in Tetrahymena (p80 and p95) that appear to be associated with the telomerase complex but not being the catalytic subunit (Collins et al, 1995). This led to the identification of mammalian homologues, TP1 (Harrington et al, 1997; Nakayama et al, 1997), which RNA transcript does not correlate with the telomerase activity. Cloning and characterisation of a human telomeric-repeat binding factor revealed that human telomeres form a specialised nucleoprotein complex (Chong et al., 1995). Recently it was reported that this protein, TRF1, is involved in regulating the telomere length (van Steensel and de Lange, 1997). Expression of telomerase in cancer cells Presence of telomerase activity in immortal human cell populations and malignant tumours and its general absence prior to this stage, has led to the suggestions that cellular immortalisation and telomerase reactivation are essential for the progression and clinical lethality of most human tumours, but not for their formation (Kim et al, 1994; Edington et al, 1995). In many cases of cancer, the inactivation of tumour suppressors such as p53 and pRb, which allows cells to overcome Ml and have an extended lifespan (Figure 1.), directly leads to the genomic instability that contributes to the accumulation of additional mutations (Harley, 1991, 1995). Maintenance of telomeres at very short lengths, as is the case for many human tumours, may be sufficient to stabilise chromosome ends enough for cell division. Yet, this stabilisation may not totally eliminate the potential for increased chromosomal recombination, which could contribute to genomic instability and tumour progression. The method used for detection of telomerase activity is called TRAP assay (telomeric repeat amplification protocol) (Kim et al., 1994). The cells are lysed in a way that keeps the telomerase activity intact. After enzymatic elongation of an added synthetic oligonucleotide, the specific telomeric product is amplified by PCR for detection. This method has simplified the work in the telomerase field a lot. To date nearly all types of human neoplasia have been screened for the presence of the enzyme, and 759 of 895 (i.e. 85%) of malignant tumours tested have been shown to express telomerase activity (Shay and Bacchetti, 1997). Expression of hTR in telomerase negative somatic cells as well as telomerase positive malignant cells, should indicate that the presence of the RNA component is not the only factor required for enzymatic activity. This is in accordance with the findings that the levels of hTR is not affected when telomerase activity is decreased during experimentally induced differentiation of tumour cells in vitro (Feng et al, 1995), and that the level of hTR in a variety of different tumours is not shown to predict the level of telomerase activity in the tumour (Avilion et al, 1996). In contrast, hTERT correlates with telomerase activity (Nakamura et al., 1997; Meyerson et al, 1997; Kilian et al, 1997; Kolquist et al, 1998; Kanaya et al, 1998). Expression of hTERT is up-regulated concomitant with the activation of telomerase during immortalisation of cultured cells and down-regulated during in vitro cellular differentiation (Meyerson et al., 1997). These results suggest that induction of hTERT mRNA expression is required for telomerase activity during cellular immortalisation and tumour progression. Telomerase as a diagnostic and possible prognostic marker Given the association between telomere length and telomerase activity with cancer and senescence, it is reasonable to analyse and quantify telomerase activity in tumour cells. This may be a diagnostic and prognostic marker and itself a target for therapy. The present data suggest that telomerase may be the most specific and universal cancer marker known to date. Furthermore, a number of studies have shown that telomerase expression correlates with clinical outcome in some cancers (reviewed in Bacchetti and Counter, 1995; Shay and Wright, 1996; Shay and Bacchetti, 1997; Le et al, 1998; Yoshida et al, 1998), which means that telomerase can be used as a prognostic marker as well as a diagnostic marker in these kinds of cancer. Generally, the levels of telomerase activity increases with cancer disease severity (Counter et al, 1995; Hiyama E. et al, 1995a, 1996a), but there is a substantial variability even among tumours of the same type and stage. The data collected indicate that telomerase is a prevalent and specific tumour marker (Bacchetti and Counter, 1995; Leber and Bacchetti, 1996; Shay and Wright, 1996; Shay and Bacchetti, 1997). The presence of telomerase activity can indicate presence of either normal telomerase-competent cells or cancer cells. Correspondingly, the absence of telomerase-activity can indicate either presence of telomerase-silent normal cells or the quiescent state of telomerase-competent cells. Therefore, the prognostic value of levels of telomerase activity is limited unless careful control experiments are done. This can be illustrated by the fact that certain haemotopoietic cells show low levels of telomerase activity, which complicates the detection of circulating cancer cells in blood and bone marrow. High levels of enzyme correlate with poor clinical outcome in neuroblastoma (Hiyama E. et al, 1995a). Interestingly, patients with metastatic IV-S neuroblastoma, a disease stage known to have a high frequency of natural regression, showed in general no or low telomerase activity. In fact, those with no tumour telomerase expression experienced spontaneous regression of the tumours. Also high levels of the telomerase RNA component have been shown to have a statistically correlation with poor clinical outcome in neuroblastoma patients (Kim, 1997). Clinical outcome and several prognostic indicators of breast cancer have been shown to have a statistically significant correlation with the level of telomerase activity (Hiyama E. et al, 1996b; Kim, 1997). Similarly, telomerase activity was found in 85% of gastric tumours and the majority of the negative cases was early-stage (Hiyama E. et al, 1995b; Tahara et al, 1996). Chadeneau et al (1995) showed that telomerase activity could not be detected in adenomatous polyps of the colon whereas it could be detected in colorectal carcinomas. Thus for carcinomas and neuroblastomas there may be a prognostic value in knowing the telomerase status. Telomerase expression can be a useful marker for predicting outcome of disease. In addition, such a novel marker might provide new information for determining appropriate treatment for a cancer patient. Recently, it was shown that telomerase activity was inhibited by cisplatin treatment in human testicular cancer (Burger et al, 1997), and that the telomerase activity in different malignant cells was inhibited when introducing retroviruses expressing RNA complementary to the template region of hTR (Bisoffi et al, 1998). The value of a prognostic marker will be most evident where there are clearly defined treatment options that are dependent upon the aggressiveness of the tumour in question. Thus, a telomerase-based prognostic assay could for example differentiate node-negative breast cancer patients either by screening of the primary tumour for telomerase expression level or screening of circulating cancer cells (micrometastasis). The latter patients are likely to experience tumour recurrence and metastatic disease and will benefit from more an aggressive therapy. Telomerase detection may be a prognostic marker during treatment of cancer since there is evidence for that telomerase activity can be turned off by inducing cancer cells to differentiate (Sharma et al, 1995; Bestilny et a/., 1996; Xu et al, 1996). Micrometastasis During routine screening, for example by mammography, suspicious lumps can be detected. By obtaining a sample of this lump, the pathologist can readily diagnose whether the cells are malignant or not. However, the fate of the cancer patient is far more difficult to determine. It depends on a cellular event that is very hard to observe directly; metastasis, the spread of malignant cells throughout the body that induces secondary tumours. When a cancer treatment fails, metastasis is usually the primary cause of death. If a primary tumour is detected early and removed before metastasis occurs, the cancer will be eradicated. On the other hand, if even microscopic metastases (micrometastasis) or secondary tumours are already present at the time of diagnosis, then the prognosis is grave and tougher treatment is needed. Left untreated, these metastasis will normally grow and prove fatal. Therefore, an early detection of cancer is of major importance, and the detection of metastasis and even micrometastasis is important for choosing the right treatment regimen. The problem of detecting cancer cells at an early stage and micrometastasis in blood or bone marrow, is the problem of detecting rare cancer cells among a huge excess of normal cells (Pelkey et al., 1996). The detection system needed for this can be based on: locating cells at a site they should not be present a component present in cancer cells but not in normal cells a combination of the two above The technology presently used is based on microscopic detection of cancer cells. This can be made easier by selective staining of cancer cells made possible by cells present at an abnormal location. An example of this is staining of cytokeratin, an epithelial cell-specific protein also found in carcinoma cells circulating in blood or bone marrow. Another possibility is to isolate mRNA and do an amplification of genes expressed more or less specifically in cancer cells. The latter approach is very difficult since even tissue-specific genes is normally present at a very low level in so called "non-expressing cells". There can be a big difference in expression, for example 10 000 copies per cancer cell and 1 mRNA per normal cell. However, this is more than outweighed by the ratio of rare cancer cells to normal cells, for example 1 per million (e.g. a mRNA ratio of 10 000 mRNA copies in cancer cells and 1 million in normal cells). This is of course made almost impossible when the cancer cell is present in its "normal" environment, like trying to detect colon carcinoma cells in faeces among the excess of normal colon cells. Both the microscopic approach and the mRNA approach can be made feasible by an enrichment of cancer cells, either by depletion of normal cells or positive selection of cancer cells (Hardingham et al, 1993, 1995; Eaton et al, 1997; Naume et al, 1997; Lycke et al, 1997). However, all these strategies are more or less based on the ability to detect the cancer cell at an "abnormal" location, for example epithelial derived carcinoma cells in blood or bone marrow. The present invention aims to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for detecting telomerase activity in a sample, which comprises: (a) treating the sample with a solid phase under conditions to bind telomerase to the solid phase; (b) separating the solid phase from the treated sample to form a test sample which is optionally treated to elute bound telomerase from the solid phase; and (c) assaying the test sample for telomerase activity. In a further aspect, the present invention provides use of a solid phase for separating telomerase from a sample by treating the sample with the solid phase so as to bind the telomerase thereto . In a further aspect the present invention provides use of a solid phase for detecting telomerase activity in a sample by treating the sample with the solid phase so as to bind the telomerase thereto and assaying the solid phase for telomerase activity. In a further aspect the present invention provides a kit for detecting telomerase activity, comprising a solid phase for binding telomerase and one or more components for assaying for telomerase activity. In a further aspect the present invention provides use of a kit as described herein, for the detection of cancer cells. In a further aspect the present invention provides a component of an assay system for detecting telomerase activity, which comprises a solid phase for binding telomerase on which is present a substrate for telomerase elongation. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIGURE 1 shows a graph of telomere length against replicative age for various cell types. FIGURE 2 shows a representation of the predicted mechanism of human telomerase. FIGURE 3 shows a polyacrylamide gel as described in Example 1 illustrating the detection limit for the telomerase repeat assay. FIGURE 4 shows a polyacrylamide gel as described in Example 2 illustrating the isolation of telomerase activity with magnetic beads. FIGURE 5 shows a polyacrylamide gel as described in Example 3 illustrating the isolation of telomerase activity using Dynabeads DNA DIRECT. FIGURE 6 shows a polyacrylamide gel as described in Example 4 illustrating the isolation of telomerase with increasing quantities of epoxide beads. FIGURE 7 shows a polyacrylamide gel as described in Example 5 illustrating a test for the presence of genomic DNA in the remaining lysate fractions after bead-based telomerase isolation. FIGURE 8 shows a SDS-PAGE gel as described in Example 6 illustrating the binding of proteins to polymer magnetic beads. FIGURE 9 shows a polyacrylamide gel as described in Example 7 illustrating the sensitivity and reliability of the telomerase isolation method. FIGURE 10 shows a polyacrylamide gel as described in Example 8 illustrating the enricliment of circulating carcinoma cells in blood with subsequent detection of telomerase activity. FIGURE 11 shows a polyacrylamide gel as described in Example 9 illustrating telomerase activity in micrometastatic cells in pleura from a breast cancer patient. FIGURE 12 shows a flowchart illustrating the combination of the telomerase isolation with the TRAP assay and mRNA isolation from the lysate for detection of micrometastatic cells. FIGURE 13 shows a flowchart illustrating a method for detecting telomerase activity in colonic cells isolated from faeces. RECTIFIED SHEET (RULE 91) ISA/EP DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The invention will now be described in further detail, by way of example only. Telomerase assay (Example 1) The method used for determining telomerase activity is called TRAP assay (telomeric repeat assay protocol) (Kim et al. 1994). The cells of interest are lysed in a way that keeps the telomerase activity intact. A synthetic oligonucleotide is added to the lysate, and the mixture RECTIFIED SHEET (RULE 91) ISA/EP 13a is incubated at 37° C to allow for the telomerase to use this oligo for elongation. This specific telomeric product is amplified by PCR for detection. However, this method still involves the analysis of 32 P -labelled reaction products by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Kim et al. 1994, Piatyszek et al. 1995). Modifications such as introduction of an internal standard (Wright et al. 1995) have improved the reliability of the assay. A further improvement is done by combining the TRAP assay with a scintillation proximity assay technology (SPA) (Savoysky et al. 1996). This increases the speed of the assay by omitting the electrophoresis step. Whereas, for the TRAP-PAGE, the detection limit is about 100 cells per assay, in the case of TRAP-SPA, the telomerase activity could clearly be detected with as few as 10 cells. Improved primer design and development of a semi-quantitative assay has also increased the reliability of the assay (Kim and Wu 1997). In general, the current gold standard for most cancer diagnosis is histopathology, which in most cases provides an accurate assessment of the suspected tissue biopsies. Therefore, the most significant clinical utility of a telomerase assay could be in the diagnosis of cancer through obtainable body fluids such as blood, bone marrow, urine, sputum and materials derived from various washes. Fine needle biopsies, cervical smears and analysis of cells in the faeces might also be useful for improved early diagnosis of primary cancer. Method for isolation of telomerase enzyme complex Initial experiments using magnetic beads to isolate cells prior to running a TRAP assay gave confusing results. The magnetically isolated cells were lysed in the lysis buffer included in the TRAPeze kit (Oncor Inc., USA), the magnetic beads removed and the telomeric repeat assay protocol performed using the lysate. The results showed either no activity or very weak activity even in cell lines known to be strongly positive. Surprisingly, the telomerase activity follows the magnetic beads after cell lysis and with enough beads present all activity can be removed from the lysate (Example 2, 3, 4, 7). We have developed this into a simple and rapid method for isolating telomerase complexes from crude lysates. The TRAP assay has been shown to be prone to inhibition by some lysates - this is especially true if too much material is analysed (Broccoli et al. 1995, Norrback 1996). For each extract initial TRAP reactions must be performed to identify conditions under which the TRAP reaction are not inhibited. This has usually been done by measuring the protein content in the lysate and using samples containing 14 0.1-1.0 μg per assay since 2.5 μg to 25 μg has been shown to result in inhibition (Broccoli et al. 1995). Including an internal control will reveal any inhibition (Wright et al. 1995). It has been shown that several samples tested to be negative were actually false negatives due to inhibition of the TRAP assay (Sugino et al. 1997). By isolating the telomerase complexes we are able to avoid any inhibition and much larger samples can be screened for telomerase activity. This is especially useful if the telomerase-positive cells represent a minor fraction of the sample for example stem cells in blood, bone marrow or tissues or cancer cells metastasis in lymph nodes or circulating micrometastasis. We have been using different kinds of magnetic Dynabeads, Antibody coated beads of 2,8 (Example 2, 8 and 9) or 4,5 μm size, uncoated magnetic beads of the same sizes and Dynabeads DNA DIRECT (Example 3 and 4), and all bead types tested so far isolate the telomerase complexes. The fact that telomerase works on chromosomal DNA ends made it natural to put forward a hypothesis that telomerase was bound indirectly to the magnetic beads via chromosomal DNA. This hypothesis was supported when it was shown that beads developed for isolation of DNA also could be used for capture of telomerase (Example 3). To verify this assumption, it had to be proven that DNA was present in the bead fraction after isolation of telomerase, but the hypothesis had to be rejected since DNA remained in the lysate after telomerase isolation (Example 4). The magnetic particles used in this study, except from those developed for DNA isolation, were coated with aromatic epoxide monomers and had a hydrophilic surface, which in general will immobilise biomolecules. This hydrophilic surface has an advantage over hydrophobic surfaces, as denaturation of the captured enzyme will be avoided and thereby reduce loss of enzymatic activity over time. We do not want to be limited by any explanation but a likely explanation that is telomerase isolated by the magnetic beads through non-specific binding of the telomerase complex along with other proteins, protein complexes and RNA-protein complexes (Example 6). We assume that this method for isolating telomerase complexes also will be useful for isolating any kind of proteins, RNA or complexes, and that this can be designed by changing the surface properties of the solid phase. The lysis buffer in the TRAPeze kit includes 0,5 % CHAPS, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 0.1 mM 15 benzamidine. This results in cell lysis but there is no strong denaturating component and RNA and proteins complexes are kept intact. Experiments performed (Examples 2-9) show that the telomerase complexes attached to the magnetic beads remain enzymatically active after removal of the cell lysate. This implies that the beads with the captured and purified telomerase complexes can be added directly to the TRAP mix for enzymatic elongation of the telomere with subsequent PCR amplification of the telomeric product. The isolated telomerase can also be used for any other kind of method for testing telomerase activity. The findings that the telomerase activity follows the magnetic beads simplifies greatly the telomerase assay. The main advantage of the method invented is the separation of the telomerase complex from the lysate, which may contain inhibitors of the assay causing false negatives. Too much cell extract added to the TRAP assay can also inhibit the telomerase activity (Broccoli et al, 1995). Negative TRAP assays need careful interpretation as demonstrated when phenol-chloroform extraction, after the telomerase extension reaction, of previously telomerase negative samples revealed presence of PCR inhibitors in 30% of these samples (Sugino et al, 1997). Use of magnetic beads coated with antibodies towards epithelial cells (Example 2 and 8), non-coated epoxide beads (Example 4) and magnetic beads developed for isolation of DNA (Example 3) for capture telomerase is an advantage when performing the TRAP assay for detection of enzymatic activity. Lysis buffer can be separated from the complex of telomerase and beads and in this way reduce the probability for false negative results. The complex of beads and telomerase was separated from the cell lysate using a magnet. In this way interfering agents were removed along with the lysate, before the complex of telomerase and beads was resuspended in fresh lysis buffer or dH 2 O for telomere synthesis and PCR amplification. A clean bead fraction also leads to an improved reliability of the assay even when working close to the detection limit (Example 7). Removal of most of the contaminating factors reduces the probability of obtaining false negative results, and hence increases the reliability of the TRAP method. This will presumably also be an advantage where there are problems with false negative tests due to the mucous nature of some tumours 16 (Duggan et al, 1998). Magnetic beads could be used to isolate telomerase and remove the viscous lysate prior to the enzymatic synthesis. The same sensitivity without radioactive labelling was achieved with the telomerase isolation method as Kavaler et al (1998) achieved with radioactive labelling using exactly the same primers, buffers and PCR conditions! With a sensitivity of approximately 50 cells in both studies, use of a solid phase for isolation of telomerase will therefore be in preference to radioactive labelling to avoid radiation and the time-consuming exposure of the X-ray film to gain signals strong enough for visualisation. The beads can still be used to achieve capture of telomerase even when using methods not based on immunomagnetic separation of cancer cells. By adding beads directly to the cell lysate, the telomerase complex can still be isolated and separated from the lysate without centrifugation, which will be more lenient to the functional enzyme. Another advantage using a solid phase like magnetic beads for telomerase capture, is presumably the yield of the isolation procedure. Solid phase used for telomerase isolation The solid support may be any of the well known supports or matrices which are currently widely used or proposed for immobilisation, separation, purification etc. These may take the form of particles, sheets, filters, membranes, fibres, capillaries, microtitre strips, tubes, plates, well or biochips etc. Conveniently the support may be made of glass, silica, latex, cellulose, agarose or any polymeric material. Preferred are materials presenting a high surface area for binding of the telomerase complex and other proteins or protein complexes. Such supports will generally have an irregular surface and may be for example be porous or particulate eg. particles, fibres, webs, sinters or sieves. Particulate materials eg. beads are generally preferred due to their greater binding capacity, particularly polymeric beads. Conveniently, a particulate solid support used according to the invention will comprise spherical beads. The size of the beads is not critical, but they may for example be of the order 17 of diameter of at least 1 and preferably at least 2 μm, and have a maximum diameter of preferably not more than 10 and more preferably not more than 6 μm. For example, beads of diameter 2.8 μm and 4.5 μm have been shown to work well. Monodisperse particles, that is those which are substantially uniform in size eg. size having a diameter standard deviation of less than 25 %, preferably less than 10 % and more preferably less than 5 %, have the advantage that they provide very uniform reproducibility of reaction. Monodisperse polymer particles produced by the technique described in US-A-4336173 are especially suitable. Non-magnetic polymer beads suitable for use in the method of the invention are available from Dyno particles AS (Lillestrøm, Norway), as well as Seradyn (Indianapolis, US), Qiagen (Germany), Amersham Pharmacia (UK) and others. Magnetic particles suitable for use in the method of the invention are aviable from Dynal (Oslo, Norway), Seradyn (Indianapolis, US), Scigen (Sittingbourne, UK) and others. However, to aid manipulation and separation magnetic beads are preferred. The term "magnetic" as used herein means that the support is capable of having a magnetic moment imparted to it when placed in a magnetic field, and thus is displaceable under the action of that field. In other words, a support comprising magnetic particles may readily be removed by magnetic aggregation, which provides a quick, simple and efficient way of separating the particles following the cell and molecular binding steps, and is a far less rigorous method than traditional techniques such as centrifugation which generate shear forces which may disrupt cells, degrade molecules or destroy the biological activity of the isolated component. Thus, using the method of the invention, the magnetic particles with telomerase complex and other proteins or RNA-protein complexes attached may be removed onto a suitable surface by application of a magnetic field eg. using a permanent magnet. It is usually sufficient to apply a magnet to the side of the vessel containing the sample mixture to aggregate the particles to the wall of the vessel and to pour away the remainder of the sample. Especially preferred are super-paramagnetic particles for example those described by Sintef in EP-A-106873, as magnetic aggregation and clumping of the particles during the reaction can be avoided, thus ensuring uniform isolation the biological material. The well-known magnetic particles sold by Dynal AS (Oslo, Norway) as DYNABEADS, are particularly suited to use in the present invention. Functionalised coated particles for use in the present invention may be prepared by modification of the beads according to US patents 4336173 and 4,459,378 and 4,654,267. Thus, beads, or other supports, may be prepared having different types of functionalised surface, for example positively or negatively charged, hydrophilic or hydrophobic. Different molecular components exhibit different degrees of non-specific binding to different surfaces and supports and it may be advantageous to "titrate" the amount of solid support (eg. the number of particles) per volume unit, in order to optimise the binding conditions, and determine the optimum support area eg. particle concentration for a given system. The cell sample, isolated or support-bound cells are lysed to release their components including telomerase complexes. Methods of cell lysis are well known in the art and widely described in the literature and any of the known methods may be used. Different methods may be more appropriate for different sample types and different cells, but to keep the biological activity of the target components it is important to use an appropriate lysis method with appropriate buffers and mechanical lysis. To carry out the method of the invention, the cells may be isolated by any means like centrifugation of liquid samples, needle biopsies, buccal scrapes, preferentially for the method of the invention cells are enriched by using a solid support and the support-bound cells may conveniently be removed or separated from the remainder of the sample, thereby concentrating or enriching the cells. Thus the cell binding step serves to enrich the cells and/or to concentrate them in a smaller volume than the initial sample. Lysis may then conveniently be achieved by adding an appropriate lysis buffer containing the desired lysis agents or by subjecting the isolated cells to the desired lysis conditions. For example, in the case of simply adding a lysis buffer containing the appropriate lysis agents, the isolated cells may simply be 19 incubated in the presence of the lysis buffer for a suitable interval to allow for lysis to take place without destroying the biological activity of the target component eg. the telomerase. Telomerase activity and primary cancer diagnostics To date nearly all types of human neoplasia have been screened for the presence of telomerase activity and 759 of 895 (i.e. 85%) of the malignant tumours tested were shown to express this enzyme (Shay and Bacchetti, 1997), a result that can be utilised to distinguish malignant from non-malignant tumours (Sommerfeld et al., 1996; Hiyama et al., 1996b; Sugino et al., 1996; Kyo et al, 1997; Murakami et al, 1997; Yoshida et al, 1998). Several research groups are working hard to find a solution to the problem of detecting exfoliated cancer cells using telomerase as a diagnostic marker, but neither of them have come up with a reliable method yet. False negative results due to inhibitors of the TRAP assay is the main problem in the search for exfoliated cancer cells using telomerase activity as the diagnostic marker (Califano et al., 1996; Mϋller et al., 1996, 1998; Yoshida et al., 1997a, b; Heine et al, 1998; Kavaler et al., 1998; Sumida et al, 1998). Until recently it has been problematic to detect telomerase activity in exfoliated carcinoma in voided urine due to presence of PCR inhibitors (Mϋller et al, 1996, 1998; Heine et al., 1998). However, this problem has more or less been overcome by several washings of the exfoliated cells after centrifugation (Yoshida et al, 1997b; Kavaler et al., 1998), but it is a time consuming procedure with an extensive loss of cells. Recently, Murakami et al. (1998) published a rather successful protocol for enrichment of cancer cells from body cavity fluids and uterine washings. The presence of activated lymphocytes might give false positive results, large amounts of blood could interfere with PCR and the proteins in blood cell components might dilute proteins from cancer cells. Inclusion of blood and lipid components had therefore to be minimised during collection of the samples. To increase the cancer cell ratio and remove erythrocytes and lymphocytes, tumour cells were isolated using Nycoprep (Nycomed Pharma AS), a method based on the same principles as Lymphoprep. But it was observed that the centrifugation steps in the enrichment procedure caused inactivation of telomerase and reduced the number of tumour 20 cells to be collected. These problems were overcome by culturing the cells for 24-48 hours before performing the TRAP assay. Adding immunomagnetic beads coated with antibodies towards epithelial cells to enrich circulating cancer cells from any body fluid with subsequent washing of the complex of bead and cells, will remove interfering substances like blood, bacteria and other non-cancerous cells from the captured cells. Experiments where immunomagnetic separation techniques for enrichment and detection of viable breast carcinoma cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood have been tested, have revealed a 3 log enrichment of the cancer cells with a recovery of 70% (Borgnes et al, 1996; Naume et al., 1997). With this knowledge there are strong reasons to believe that such an enrichment of cancer cells is much better than the methods based on centrifugation, as described above (Murakami et al, 1998; Yoshida et al, 1997b; Kavaler et al., 1998). As the ribonucleoprotein telomerase complex and the PCR amplification are both very sensitive for interfering agents, removal of possible inhibitors prior to detection of the enzymatic activity of telomerase is an important part of the protocol. This step is simplified by the use of beads with affinity for telomerase utilising the magnetic properties of the beads. Both the complexes of beads with enriched cancer cells and beads with captured telomerase can easily be washed and in this way interfering agents will be removed. Murakami et al. (1998) described the problem centrifugation entails on telomerase activity, but by using immunomagnetic isolation of cancer cells and telomerase this problem is avoided; there will be no need for a time consuming step for culturing of cells before performing the TRAP assay because interfering agents are removed before enzymatic elongation of the telomere and PCR amplification. The clinical relevance of telomerase has been demonstrated in several independent experiments. In one case reported, no tumour was visualised at cytoscopic examination of the urine bladder, while a bladder washing at the same time showed telomerase activity. Repeating the cytoscopic examination of this patient four weeks later revealed presence of a small bladder tumour (Mϋller et al, 1996). In another case, telomerase activity was detected in the pancreatic juice 19 months before the affected person got the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using computed tomography for screening (Suehara et al., 1998). These two examples illustrate how proliferating tumours can be revealed by detection of telomerase before they are 21 big enough for visualisation, and that the enzymatic activity in this way can be used for making a diagnosis at an earlier stage than today. In general, the current gold standard for most cancer diagnosis is histopathology, which in most cases provides an accurate assessment of the suspected tissue biopsies. Therefore, the most significant clinical utility of a telomerase assay could be in the diagnosis of cancer through obtainable body fluids such as blood, bone marrow, urine, sputum, and materials derived from various washes as demonstrated by isolation and detection of telomerase in pleura (Example 9). Fine needle biopsies, cervical smears and analysis of cells in the faeces might also be useful for improved early diagnosis of primary cancer. Micrometastasis detection by telomerase activity Isolation of circulating micrometastasis has been shown to be an important way of proving cancer dispersion. The problem of detecting cancer cells at an early stage and micrometastasis in blood and bone marrow, is the problem of detecting rare cancer cells among a huge excess of normal cells (Pelkey et al., 1996). The main problem when using telomerase activity as a marker for detection of circulating cancer cells is false negative results due to inhibitors of the TRAP assay (Sugino et al, 1996, 1 97; Cunningham et al, 1998; Yang et al; 1998). High levels of peripheral blood cell contamination is one reason for false negatives because it would dilute out the telomerase derived from the intended target cell population (Cunningham et al, 1998). A sensitivity of 91.4% and a specificity of 94.2% was achieved when testing the diagnostic value of telomerase activity on pleural ;ff..sion (Yang at al; 1 98). As Murakami et al. ( 1998), Yang et al. ( 1998) were concerned about the presence of leukocytes in the effusion samples. Contamination of leukocytes might give false positive results that could undermine the diagnostic value of the TRAP assay. Detection of micrometastasis in blood was demonstrated in Example 8 with immunomagnetic enrichment of cancer cells and telomerase capture in combination with detection of telomerase activity. Several independent experiments showed a sensitivity of 2-3 cancer cells per million normal cells, which should demonstrate both the sensitivity and the reliability of this method. The same protocol was tested on clinical material, which resulted in detection of micrometastatic cells in pleura from breast cancer patients (Figure 1 1 ). Telomerase activity was 22 RECTIFIED SHEET (RULE 91) found mainly in the bead fraction but some activity was also found in the remaining lysate. This result can be explained by presence of more telomerase complexes in the samples tested than the beads were able to capture. This invention describes a novel method for detection of micrometastasis; circulating cancer cells were enriched following an immunomagnetic isolation protocol (Bosnes et al., 1997), telomerase was isolated and then detected using the TRAP assay (Kim et al., 1994). Immunomagnetic isolation and TRAP assay are both recognised methods in molecular biology, but the combination of these two methods has never been described earlier. Enrichment of circulating carcinoma and isolation of telomerase in combination with detection of enzymatic activity can be a contribution in the use of telomerase as both a diagnostic and a prognostic marker. In summary, this invention describes a method for improved telomerase detection and in addition how this method is combined with targeting cells of interest by cell sorting prior to telomerase detection. One example of this is positive selection of circulating carcinoma cells in blood or bone marrow combined with telomerase detection. There is provided: A method for telomerase detection by isolating the telomerase complex from crude cell lysates using a solid-phase and preferentially magnetic beads. A method for telomerase detection in target cells by positive enrichment of target cells or depletion of unwanted cells like telomerase-competent stem cells, or a combination of positive and negative enrichment strategies to target only cells of interest and removing cells interfering with the assay. A method for telomerase detection by combining telomerase isolation with detection of telomerase subunits like telomerase RNA. This method detects only components integrated in telomerase complexes and will not detect free subunits in the cell. 23 A simple and reliable method of detecting primary cancer cells in body fluids or faeces by combining cell purification with telomerase complex isolation and telomerase detection. Example 1: Telomer Repeat Assay Protocol - TRAP Assay Detection of telomerase activity in clinical samples with rare cells requires a sensitive assay. The aim of this example was to determine the sensitivity of the telomerase repeat assay without any radioactive labelling. To do so, a series of samples with increasing number of cells 40 to 1000 were set up. The telomerase activity - TRAP assay - was measured in each case (Figure 3), following the original TRAPeze protocol (Oncor). Method The SW480 cultured cells of epithelial origin, were washed twice in PBS and collected by centrifugation at 600x g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were lysed in 20 μl CHAPS lysis buffer and incubated for 25-30 minutes on ice. For telomerase assay, a mix was prepared: 5 μl lOx TRAP buffer 1 μl 5 Ox dNTP mix 1 μl TS primer 1 μl TRAP primer mix 2 Units Taq polymerase X μl Cell lysate Total volume 50 μl The mix was incubated 30 minutes at 30°C for telomerase-mediated extension of the TS- primer. Amplification procedure directly following the extension: 94°C for 90 sec followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 60° C for 30 sec. Separation of the PCR products by electrophoresis on a 12.5 % acrylamide gel. lx CHAPS lysis buffer: 0.5 % CHAPS TRAP reaction mixture: 10 % Glycerol 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8,3 10 mMTris-HCl pH 7.5 1.5 mM MgCl 2 1 mM MgCl 2 63 mM KC1 1 mM EGTA 0.05 % Tween 20 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol 1 mM EGTA 0.1 mM Benzamidine 50 μM dNTPs 24 2 μCi 32 P-dCTP and "P-TTP 10X TRAP reaction buffer 0.1 μg TS oligonucleotide 200 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3 0.5 μM T4 gene 32 protein (USB) (lμg) 15 mM MgCl 2 2 Units Taq polymerase 630 mM KC1 0.5 % Tween 20 10 mMEGTA 0.1 % Bovine serum albumin (BSA) 50X dNTP MIX = 2.5 mM each of dATP, dTTP, dGTP, dCTP Figure 3 shows that the detection limit without radioactive labelling of the oligonucleotide for this telomerase detection method, is somewhere between 40-50 SW480 cells. The telomerase positive bands increase in strength with increasing number of cells with the exception of 100 cells sample which in this experiment did not show as much telomerase activity as expected. The manufacturer of the TRAPeze kit (Oncor, US), shows telomerase activity in an extract from 80 telomerase positive cells in their documentation. Example 2: Isolation of telomerase activity with magnetic beads In this experiment cultured cancer cells were combined with antibody-coated beads prior to the telomerase assay (TRAPeze kit, Oncor, US). This was a simulation of immunomagnetic separation of cells since the cell line S W480 would bind to the anti-Epithelial Dynabeads through the BerEP4 antibodies on the beads. The cells captured onto the magnetic beads were lysed and the beads were separated from the lysate. Both the bead fraction and the remaining lysate were tested for telomerase activity. Method 1000 SW480 cultured cells were washed twice in PBS, collected at 600 g for 10 minutes at 4°C, suspended in ice-cold Wash buffer, spun down again. Magnetic beads (Dynabeads) of different types were used, antibody-coated Dynabeads M-450 or antibody-coated Dynabeads M-280. In this experiment, Dynabeads anti-Epithelial Cell (M-280) was used. These beads were added to the cells and thereafter suspended in 20 μl of ice-cold CHAPS lysis buffer. Incubation on ice for 25-30 minutes before the magnetic beads were collected at the tube wall with a Dynal MPC-E. The lysate was transferred to a new tube and the beads were suspended in 40 μl ice-cold CHAPS lysis buffer. For telomerase assay, a mix was prepared as in experiment 1. 25 Incubation 30 minutes at 30°C for telomerase-mediated extension of the TS-primer. Amplification procedure directly following the extension: 94°C for 90 sec followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 60° C for 30 sec. Separation of the PCR products by electrophoresis on a 12.5 % acrylamide gel. Results The same amount of telomerase-positive SW480 cells (1000) were lysed in the presence of magnetic beads (Dynabeads M-280 anti-Epithelial Cell), whereas 1, 10 or 20 million magnetic beads were used. Before the TRAP assay, the beads were withdrawn from the sample using a magnet at the tube wall (Dynal MPC-E) and the lysate was transferred to a new tube. The beads were suspended in CHAPS lysis buffer. Both the bead fractions and the remaining lysates were tested for telomerase activity as shown in Figure 4. Positive telomerase signals were only seen in the bead fractions and best results were obtained using 20 million magnetic beads. Conclusion We conclude that the telomerase complexes surprisingly are bound directly or indirectly to the magnetic beads after cell lysis in the TRAPeze lysis buffer. When the magnetic beads were removed prior to the telomerase assay, no activity was detected (result not shown). The capture of telomerase onto magnetic beads did not destroy the biological activity of the enzyme complex. This implies that the telomerase activity can be tested by isolating the telomerase using magnetic beads and the lysate with inhibitors can be removed prior to TRAP test. Best results for capture of the telomerase complex were obtained with 20 million Dynabeads (300μg) when using 1,000 SW480 cultured cells. Example 3: Isolation of the telomerase complex using Dynabeads DNA DIRECT In example 2 telomerase was isolated using antibody-coated magnetic beads. In this example we used uncoated Dynabeads designed for the isolation of genomic DNA directly from lysates. Variable amounts of Dynabeads DNA DIRECT (Dynal, Oslo, Norway) were used to isolate telomerase activity from 2000 SW480 cells. The same method as in Example 2 was used. 26 Conclusion The telomerase complex can be isolated from a cell lysate with uncoated magnetic beads normally used for DNA isolation. For 2000 cells the optimal amount of DNA DIRECT beads to be used for telomerase isolation is between 20 - 30 million or 300 - 450 μg. Example 4: Isolation of telomerase with uncoated epoxide beads. In this example uncoated Dynabeads with epoxide polymer surface were tested for the binding of telomerase in a lysate. These beads are actually used for production of antibody-coated beads, and it was of interest to test if beads without antibodies could be used for isolating telomerase complexes. 2,000 cells were lysed in 40 μl lx CHAPS lysis buffer with different amounts of epoxide beads (range 150-400 μg of 4.5 μm Dynabeads). The beads were separated from the lysate after 30 minutes incubation on ice and re-suspended in 40 μl lysis buffer before the TRAP mix was added as described in Example 2. Figure 6 shows how the signal intensity of PCR products in the TRAP assay was almost identical in the range from 200 μg to 400 μg of beads. The signal intensity in the lane with 100 μg beads was not as strong as expected, probably due to loss of cells during isolation in this experiment. Conclusion This example shows that all telomerase complexes were bound to the beads when 200 μg beads or more were used. Alternatively, the explanation is that enough telomerase is isolated and thereby sufficient template is produced to saturate the PCR, when using 200 μg magnetic beads or more. Cells with relative high telomerase activity were used, and as a rule of thumb a minimum of approximately 0.1 μg of expoxide Dynabeads must be used per cell, to ensure that all or sufficient amount of telomerase complexes are isolated for strong TRAP assay PCR signals. 400 μg magnetic beads was used in later experiments. Example 5: Telomerase isolated indirectly through binding to DNA? The original hypothesis for the mechanism for binding of telomerase complex to the solid phase, was an indirect binding via chromosomal DNA, i.e. that the beads bound genomic DNA in a chromatin form with the telomerase complex as a part of the chromatin structure. 27 To test this hypothesis, the eluted material from the magnetic beads and purified material from the lysate fraction were tested for the presence of genomic DNA by PCR amplification. Methods The protocol in example 2 for the isolation of telomerase complexes was used. The uncoated epoxide Dynabeads was used for this example in the same way as in example 4. Different amounts of SW480 cells were tested. Each bead fraction was resuspended in 40 μl water and incubated 5 minutes at 65° for an elution of components bound to the magnetic beads. For the remaining lysates, any genomic DNA was isolated using the commercial kit QIAamp Blood Kit from Qiagen, Germany and the recommended protocol. Results Testing of the bead fractions (Figure 7) showed that no PCR product could be generated for GAPDH gene in a series using 100 to 100,000 cells as staring material. However, when material from the remaining lysates were tested, positive PCR signals were seen for all samples. Conclusion Lack of signals in the lanes where the bead fractions were tested, and positive signals where the remaining lysates where tested, should prove that chromosomal DNA does not bind to the beads, but remains in the lysate. These results show that the telomerase complex is not isolated via binding of chromosomal DNA to the beads. The proposed hypothesis about indirect binding of telomerase through chromosomal DNA was therefore rejected. Example 6: Mechanism for solid-phase telomerase isolation: non-specific binding of proteins and protein-RNA complexes to the magnetic beads. Isolation of telomerase via non-specific binding of proteins or protein-RNA complexes to the beads was the next hypothesis put forward to explain the mechnism for how the telomerase can be isolated with magnetic beads. The telomerase complex was isolated following the protocol described in Example 2, using SW480 cells as starting material. The proteins were separated and visualised using SDS-PAGE with subsequent silver staining after heat elution from the beads. 28 Method For analysis of the protein binding to the magnetic beads, the following protocol was used: 300 μg Dynabeads anti-Epithelial Cell, resuspended in PBS, was added to a cell suspension with SW480 cells. The total volume was adjusted to 1 ml with PBS containing 0.1% BSA, and left on a roller for about 15 minutes at 4°C for complete mixing to occur. The tube was placed in a MPC for 2 minutes for the bead/cell complexes to migrate to the tube wall. The supernatant was removed and discarded. The bead-bound components were eluted from the beads by placing the tube on 65°C for 5 minutes. The tube was placed in the magnet again to collect the beads and the eluate was transferred The tube was removed from the MPC, 1 ml PBS was added and the complex of beads and cells was resuspended. The beads with cells were collected again with the magnet and the washing was repeated twice. The resuspended complex of beads and cells was transferred to a clean tube before placing it in the MPC for the last washing. 100 μg non-coated epoxide beads was mixed in 40 μl lx CHAPS lysis buffer and thereafter mixed with the complex of beads and cells by pipetting. The tube was incubated 30 minutes on ice for complete lysis. The beads were collected with the magnet and the bead fraction was suspended in 10 μl lOmM Tris-HCl. to a clean tube. The PhastSystem (Pharmacia Biotech. AB, Sweden) is a SDS-PAGE system for molecular weight measurements and analysis of polypeptides. Before gel loading, 2 μl of 5x Red buffer was added to 8 μl of each of the eluates. The tubes containing this mix were placed at 100°C for 5 minutes for a denaturation of the proteins. At this step the proteins were dissociated into their respective polypeptide subunits as a result of the added SDS and β-mercaptoethanol. The tubes were stored on ice until gel loading of the samples. The proteins were separated on a 10-15 % gradient gel by electrophoresis at a constant voltage and constant pH. The PhastGel Silver Kit (Pharmacia Biotech. AB, Sweden) was used for visualisation of the proteins on the gel. With silver staining proteins can be detected with a concentration down to 0.3 - 0.5 ng/μl (Heukeshoven and Dernick, 1988). 29 The proteins bind roughly the same amount of sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) per weight unit and take on a net negative charge, rendering the intrinsic charge of the protein insignificant. In addition, the native conformation of a protein is altered when SDS is bound, and most proteins assume a similar shape, and thus a similar ratio of charge to mass. Separation will therefore depend on the molecular weight of the polypeptides alone. The mobility of the proteins is relatively unaffected by the polyacrylamide gel when the electrophoresis starts. When the proteins reach the gradient gel interface, their mobility is drastically reduced due to the sudden decrease in pore size, and the moving boundary rapidly migrates away from the proteins. The proteins unstack and migrate at a uniform voltage and at constant pH. As the proteins migrate through the gradient gel (10-15%), they separate according to their size. Results This experiment confirmed the fact that proteins bind to the epoxide beads, which is probably due to weak positive charges on the bead surface. There is yet not any known antibodies against the catalytic telomerase component hTERT, so it was not possible to conclude that hTERT was present. The protein component (hTERT) of the telomerase has a molecular weight of 127 kDa (Nakamura et al, 1997; Meyerson et al, 1997). FigureS shows proteins of this size, so the results support the hypothesis that hTERT is one of the proteins bound to the beads. The most likely conclusion of this experiment is therefore that the protein-RNA telomerase complex binds non-specific to the magnetic beads. Example 7: Sensitivity and reliability of the solid-phase telomerase isolation method This example shows how reliable the method is even when using only a small quantity of cells in the sample. The protocol for isolation of telomerase (Example 2) was followed, 50 cells were used in each parallel, as this was close to the detection limit in the method developed (Example 1). Conclusion Even with as few as 50 cells in the sample, all five samples gave positive results for telomerase activity. This should show that both the sensitivity and the reliability of the method developed in this study is good. Example 8: Detection of telomerase activity in micrometastatic cancer cells To measure telomerase activity in target cells without interference of background cells like stem cells or lymphocytes in blood or bone marrow, the solution is to sort the cells prior to telomerase measurement. This can be done by isolating the cells of interest for example by using monoclonal antibodies towards cell surface markers like the BerEP4 against a common epitope of epithelial cells. Alternatively, cells that can interfere with the results can be removed by depletion for example removing T-lymphocytes by using magnetic beads coated with antibodies towards CD2. Very clean cell populations can be obtained by using a combination of positive selection or target cells and depletion of unwanted cells (Neurauter, A. et al. 1998). In this example we show the use of cancer cell enrichment combined with telomerase isolation and subsequent TRAP assay. Cancer cells in blood will be at a very low number compared with the nucleated leukocytes in blood, down to 1 cancer cell per million normal cells or less. To obtain this assay sensitivity, a positive selection of cancer cells can be employed by taking advantage of the fact that the cancer cells are at an «unnormal» site. Carcinoma is the major group of cancers and originates from epithelial cells. Epithelial cells, even cancerous types, express certain common epithelial cell markers. Antibodies towards such epithelial cell markers (e.g. BerEP4) can be used to isolate/enrich epithelial cells by coupling such antibodies to a solid phase like magnetic beads (Hardingham et al. 1993, 1995, Borgnes et al. 1996, Naume et al. 1997). We have obtained a 3 log enrichment of the cancer cells with a recovery of about 70 % (Borgnes et al. 1996, Naume et al. 1997). In peripheral blood cells (PBL) tested, none of 124 samples of 1000 cells tested positive for telomerase. However, using 10,000 cells or 100,000 cells many samples tested positive, 55 of 124 and 100 of 124 respectively (Shay and Wright, 1996). This implies that by removing 99.9 % of the normal cells in a blood sample this background problem can be eliminated. Method Known amounts of cultured cells (SW480) were washed twice in PBS, pelleted at 600 g for 10 minutes at 4° C, re-suspended in ice-cold Wash buffer, pelleted again. SW480 cells were spiked into 5 ml blood samples (around 20 million nucleated leukocytes). 31 20 million Dynabeads anti-Epithelial Cell (300 μg) were added to the samples (spiked and non-spiked blood samples) and continuously mixed for 30 minutes at 4°C on a roller mixer. Captured cells were collected by using a magnet (Dynal MPC-Q) and washed 3 times in PBS. 25 μl CHAPS lysis buffer with 60μg Dynabeads DNA DIRECT (4 million 2.8 μm beads) was added to the magnetic bead fraction with captured cells. 25-30 min incubation on ice before all magnetic beads were collected at the tube wall with an MPC-E. The lysate was discarded and the beads were re-suspended in 40 μl ice-cold CHAPS lysis buffer. For telomerase assay a mixture was prepared as described in example 1. Incubation 30 minutes at 30°C for telomerase-mediated extension of the TS-primer. Amplification procedure directly following the extension: 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 60° C for 30 sec. Separation of the PCR products by electrophoresis on a 12.5 % acrylamide gel. Results The immobilised cancer cells were lysed in the CHAPS lysis buffer and collecting the beads with a magnet isolated the telomerase complexes. In this example we used a combination of immunomagnetic beads and uncoated beads. The lysate was removed and in all tested cases found to be negative. Therefore, routinely we only tested the bead fractions as described in Example 2. No activity was seen in normal blood samples (unspiked) were we had followed our protocol for isolating circulating cancer cells with magnetic beads (Figurel0,lane 1). A weak signal proving telomerase activity was seen in a blood sample with 40 carcinoma cells (lane 2). Strong signals were seen in the samples with 50 to 500 carcinoma cells (lane 3-6). Positive and negative controls were as expected (lane 7-8). Lack of signals in lane 1 shows that other cells with telomerase activity, like stem cells and lymphocytes are sufficiently removed when using this method for enrichment of carcinoma cells. 32 Conclusion We have demonstrated an assay sensitivity of 10 cancer cells per ml of blood or 2-3 cancer cells per million normal cells. This is the same sensitivity as shown for micrometastasis detection using immunomagnetic enrichment combined with nested RT-PCR of cytokeratin 19 mRNA (Borgnes et al. 1996). The latter assay proves the presence of epithelial cells in blood but does not indicate if this is due to cancer cells or normal epithelial cells nor does the test have any prognostic value. The advantages of using the telomerase assay are both a diagnostic and probably a prognostic value and that nested PCR can be avoided which is know to be problematic with respect to risk of contamination. Example 9: Detection of micrometastatic cells in pleura. All the examples so far were performed on a model system where different method parameters were examined. It was therefore very exciting when the method developed was tested on samples from breast cancer patients. Method There were 6 million lymphocytes, which also weakly express telomerase (Blasco et al, 1995; Hiyama, K. et al, 1995; Chiu et al, 1996), in the 12.5 ml pleura sample tested in the experiment shown here. It was likely that the patient had circulating cancer cells in the pleura (personal communication, Dr. Gunnar Kvalheim), but the quantity of cancer cells was unknown. 20 million Dynabeads anti-Epithelial Cell were added for enrichment of cancer cells as in Example 8. The remaining cells in the pleura were lysed in lx CHAPS lysis buffer with 400 μg epoxide beads to reveal presence of the telomerase expressing lymphocytes cancer cells not captured by Dynabeads anti-Epithelial Cell. The protocol described in Example 2 and 8 was followed. Results Figure 11 shows that telomerase was detected in the enriched cell population of pleura. There seems to be some activity in the lysate fraction of this enriched population as well, which may be an indication that the number of beads added was too small for this strong telomerase activity. 33 Conclusion This experiment should show that the method for isolation of carcinoma cells with subsequent detection of telomerase activity is functional when testing on a real sample as well as when tested in the model system. Example 10: Combination of telomerase assay and CK19 assay for micrometastasis detection The technology presently used for detection of circulating micrometastasis is based on microscopic detection of cancer cells. This can be made easier by selective staining of cancer cells made possible by cells present at an unnormal location. An example of this is staining of cytokeratin in carcinoma cells found in blood or bone marrow. Another possibility is isolation of mRNA with subsequent amplification of genes expressed more or less specifically in cancer cells. Both the microscopic approach and the mRNA approach can be made feasible by an enrichment of cancer cells, either by depletion of normal cells or positive selection of cancer cells (Hardingham et al., 1993, 1995; Eaton et al., 1997; Naume et al, 1997; Lycke et al, 1997). However, all these strategies are more or less based on the ability to detect the cancer cell at an "unnormal" location, for example epithelial-derived carcinoma cells in blood or bone marrow. Cytokeratin 19 (CK-19) is one of the markers used for detection of micrometastasis using the mRNA approach. The combination of immunomagnetic enrichment of circulating cancer cells with mRNA isolation and nested RT-PCR of this transcript, makes this a sensitive method with a high degree of specificity. TRAP assay can be used for detection of the enzymatic activity of telomerase (Example 1), which is one of the most specific cancer markers known. Discovering that magnetic polymer beads can be used for an isolation of the intact telomerase complex as well as enrichment of circulating carcinoma (Example 2 and 8) improved the method for telomerase detection. In this way it will be easier both to remove factors that can inhibit the telomerase assay. 34 There is a problem with the diagnostic use of RT-PCR due to the possibility of false positive results. Without immunomagnetic enrichment of cells, some of the molecular markers used for detection of micrometastatic cells, e.g. CK-19, have been shown to be present in the normal samples. However, false positives may cause problems even though cancer cells are enriched from the blood sample. Normal epithelial cells may be present due to the needle's penetration of the skin when collecting blood or bone marrow. When adding immunomagnetic beads, these normal cells will be selected for as well as circulating cancer cells of epithelial origin. When using a mRNA transcript that is not specific for cancer cells, such as CK-19, a RT-PCR amplification of it can give a positive result if the blood sample is contaminated with normal epithelial cells, even though there are no circulating carcinoma present. Table B shows a comparison of the methods most frequently used for detection of micrometastasis. All methods are sensitive, but detection based on measurement of telomerase activity is the only method that requires living cells. Table B Methods for detection of micrometastasis lmmunocytology RT-PCR Telomerase Sensitivity High 1 : 1 θ6 cells 2: 10 6 cells Living cells? Not necessarily Not necessarily Yes Major drawback Time-consuming False positives False negatives Expression of telomerase activity is a biological phenomenon restricted to certain stem cells (Wright et al, 1996; Harle-Bachor et al, 1996; Ramierez et al, 1997; Kyo et al, 1997; Burger et al, 1997), haemopoitetic cells (Broccoli et al, 1995; Hiyama, K. et al, 1995) and tumour cells (Kim et al, 1994; Shay and Bacchetti, 1997). This specific expression pattern can be utilised to detect circulating carcinoma without considering contamination of normal telomerase negative epithelial cells. When using immunomagnetic enrichment of cells, contamination of telomerase expressing leukocytes will also be avoided. The fact that the TRAP assay measures an enzyme activity implies that it is dependent on the presence of intact cells expressing this enzyme. Thus, the TRAP assay may be a good indicator of viable as opposed to dead tumour cells. This is important because the medical 35 treatment of advanced cancers leads to the release of large amounts of DNA from dying tumour cells. It is conceivable that released DNA fragments might remain in body cavities or in the circulation for long periods of time before they are cleared by the host, potentially complicating the interpretation of tests targeting tumour-specific molecular genetic changes in genomic DNA. Telomerase is exceptionally stable at room temperature, eliminating the need for special or rapid handling procedures at the time of specimen collection (Duggan et al, 1998). This result was confirmed, as it was no problem with detection of telomerase activity in the one-day old pleura sample tested. No difference in activity was shown when the one- day old pleura sample was compared with fresh samples tested the same day as collected from the patient (data not shown). The unique combination of enrichment of circulating carcinoma with subsequent isolation and detection of an enzyme only expressed in immortal cells, should make this a strong method compared to both the microscopic and the mRNA approach, using primers for CK-19, for detection of micrometastasis. With this new method, labour-intensive microscopy can be reduced or omitted, and the possibility of artefacts due to presence of interfering agents should be decreased. However, a combination of the mRNA and the telomerase approaches, as illustrated in Figure 12, would improve the reliability when detecting micrometastatic cells. Figure 12 shov/s the combination of the telomerase isolation with the TRAP assay and mRNA isolatation from the lysate, with CK-19 as a marker. The bead traction can be used as usual for detection of telomerase activity with removal of interfering agents prior to the TRAP assay. Oligo-dT beads can be added to the lysate for isolation of polyadenylated mRNA using primers specific for CK-19 for detection of circulating cancer cells. In this way two independent tests, both very sensitive, can be performed on the same sample to diagnose micrometastasis with a high degree of reliability. 36 RECTΠ ED SHEET (RULE 9i) Example 11: Isolation of telomerase complex combined with amplification of telomerase RNA The RNA component has been cloned for the human template gene (Feng et al. 1995). Expression of the telomerase RNA is not correlated with telomerase activity, although expression is shown to be upregulated in cells that are highly positive for telomerase (Avilon et al. 1996, Blasco et al. 1996). The presence of telomerase RNA in cells with no telomerase activity may indicate a surplus of RNA component or inactivated telomerase complexes. The use of the RNA component for diagnosis is therefore not straightforward and presently not thought to be predictive of cancer. Telomerase RNA is not polyadenylated in humans and traditional method of total RNA isolation has been used for detection of this component. With the method described in this invention we believe that the RNA component can be used as a diagnostic tool. The telomerase complex can be isolated by the magnetic beads and thereby the RNA component that is integrated in the intact complexes. However, free RNA component will not be isolated with this method. By combining telomerase complex isolation 37 RECTIFI and the amplification of the RNA component by RT-PCR, we believe that positive signals will correlate with telomerase activity. Method: Sample preparation of cells with or without the use of magnetic beads. Cell lysis in a CHAPS lysis buffer or equivalent buffer with magnetic beads present. Collection of the telomerase complexes immobilised to the magnetic beads using a magnet (Dynal MPC). Removal of the remaining lysate and the bead fraction may be washed several times prior to RT-PCR of the RNA component. The RNA component may be isolated from the complex by RNA isolation procedures prior to the RT-PCR. RT-PCR of the telomerase RNA component hTR using primers: 5 ' -TCTAACCCTAACTGAGAAGGGCGTAG-3 ' 5 ' -GTTTGCTCTAGAATG AACGGTGG AAG-3 ' Cycles 94°C for 45 sec, 55°C for 45 sec, 72°C for 90 sec. 38 Human telomerase RNA: 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 I I I I I I I GGGUUGCGGAGGGUGGGCCUGGGAGGGGUGGUGGCCAUUUUUUGUCUAACCCUAACUGAGAAGGGCGUAG 70 GCGCCGUGCUUUUGCUCCCCGCGCGCUGUUUUUCUCGCUGACUUUCAGCGGGCGGAAAAGCCUCGGCCUG 140 CCGCCUUCCACCGUUCAUUCUAGAGCAAACAAAAAAUGUCAGCUGCUGGCCCGUUCGCCUCCCGGGGACC 210 UGCGGCGGGUCGCCUGCCCAGCCCCCGAACCCCGCCUGGAGCCGCGGUCGGCCCGGGGCUUCUCCGGAGG 280 CACCCACUGCCACCGCGAAGAGUUGGGCUCUGUCAGCCGCGGGUCUCUCGGGGGCGAGGGCGAGGUUCAC 350 CGUUUCAGGCCGCAGGAAGAGGAACGGAGCGAGUCCCGCCGCGGCGCGAUUCCCUGAGCUGUGGGACGUG 420 CACCCAGGACUCGGCUCACACAUGCAGUUCGCUUUCCUGUUGGUGGGGGGAACGCCGAUCGUGCGCAUCC 490 *3'end PCR-primers underlined Example 12: Isolation of colonic cells from faeces combined with telomerase assay Telomerase activity was detected in luminal washings from colectomy specimens from 60% of tested carcinoma cases but not in cases of inflammatory bowel diseases, suggesting that it can be a good marker for the detection of colon carcinoma (Yoshida et al. 1997a). However, there is a lack of non-invasive method to make this a very useful diagnostic test. Recently a method for isolating cells from stool has been ( eveloped and patented (O'Neill 1995). The method comprises steps of a) cooling the stool to a temperature below its gel freezing point and b) removing cells using immunomagnetic beads whilst the stool remains substantially intact. Alternatively exfoliated cells can be captured from colon washings also by a immunomagnetic method. The immunomagnetically isolated cells are lysed in the presence of excess magnetic beads to capture the telomerase complexes. By using a magnet the telomerase complexes are concentrated and the rest of the lysate is discarded. In this way the telomerase activity can be measured by TRAP assay or by amplifying the RNA component. One advantage of this method is, fhat any inhibiting substances from the stool sample can be removed prior to telomerase measurement. Method The stool sample is excreted directly into a collection bag which is closed and placed in ice- water. The cooling is performed for at least 30 min. 50 ml of ice-cold aqueous suspending solution pH 7.4 comprising minimum essential Eagle' medium (MEM) is added to the stool. The bag is then agitated gently for 5 mins in ice water to wash the stool surface. The buffer should contain 50mM N-acetylcysteine, 3mM sodium butyrate, antibiotics, sodium bicarbonate (lg/Iitre) and BSA (lOg/I). The N-acetylcysteine should be prepared fresh. Smaller samples of the stool could be used and proportionally less buffer. The washing solution containing the suspension of cells is removed from the bag, 0.4 gram of boric acid is added per ml of washing solution to adjust the pH. 40 RECTIFIED SHEET (RULE 91 The washings are centrifuged at 250g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatant is carefully discarded. The pellet is resuspended in 1/10 volume of ice cold suspending solution (as above). 5-10 million Dynabeads BerEP4 (4.5 μM) are added per ml of cell suspension. The beads may be added suspended in PBS. The sample is incubated on a rotator at 4°C to allow for antibody-antigen immobilisation of the cells to the magnetic beads. The immobilised cells are collected at the tube wall with a magnet (Dynal MPC) and the supernatant is removed and discarded. The cell-bead complexes are washed in PBS by gentle stirring for 2 minutes, collected with a magnet and the washing solution is discarded. The washing step must be repeated several times until no brown colour is seen in the washing solution. The immobilised cells are lysed in a CHAPS lysis buffer (example 1) in the presence of sufficient amount of beads. Usually the amount is doubled by addition of DNA DIRECT magnetic beads. The beads with any telomerase complexes are collected at the tube wall with a magnet. The isolated material is ready for telomerase assaying. Example 13: Isolation of epithelial cells from urine and sputum/buccal swabs combined with telomerase isolation and telomerase assay. By analysing exfoliated cells in urine telomerase activity was detected in 62% of bladder carcinoma patients, whereas weak signals were seen in 3 of 83 non-malignant urine samples (Yoshida et al. 1997b. Exfoliated cells were collected from 50 ml urine by centrifugation. The method described here uses immunomagnetic beads coated with antibodies towards epithelial cells to collect exfoliated cells from urine, sputum or other body fluids. The advantage of this is the removal of interfering substances like bacteria and debris. The telomerase complexes are isolated with magnetic beads from the cell lysate and analysed after removal of the rest of the lysate. 41 Urine cell sample preparation: Urine, preferably the first urine of the day, is collected and cooled on ice. 30 million Dynabeads BerEP4 (or other anti-epithelial antibodies) are added to the urine. The sample is rotated for 5-20 minutes to allow for cell immobilisation. The magnetic beads with captured cells are collected with a strong magnet (Dynal MPC) and the urine carefully discarded. The cell-bead complexes are washed twice in cold PBS before telomerase isolation. Sputum cell sample preparation: Saliva or sputum is collected in a bottle and diluted with ice-cold isotonic solution containing a mucolytic agent such as the suspending solution in example 5. Eating should be avoided for several hours prior to sample collection. For examination of the respiratory system the mouth should be cleaned with water prior to muco-ciliary clearance or coughing. After ensuring that the saliva or sputum is diluted enough to reduce its viscosity, immunomagnetic beads (preferably 4.5 μM) coated with BerEP4 are added (30 million). The sample is rotated for 5-20 minutes to allow for cell immobilisation.. The magnetic beads with captured cells are collected with a strong magnet (Dynal MPC) and the saliva/sputum carefully discarded. The cell-bead complexes are washed twice in cold PBS before telomerase isolation. Telomerase isolation: The immobilised cells are lysed in a CHAPS lysis buffer (example 1) in the presence of sufficient amount of beads. Usually the amount is doubled by addition of DNA DIRECT magnetic beads. The beads with any telomerase complexes are collected at the tube wall with a magnet. The isolated material is ready for telomerase assaying. 42 REFERENCES Asai, A.; Kiyozuka, Y.; Yoshida, R.; Fujii, T.; Hioki, K.; Tsubura, A. (1998) Telomere length, telomerase activity and telomerase RNA expression in human esophageal cancer cells: Correlation with cell proliferation, differentiation and chemosensitivity to anticancer drugs. Anticancer Res. 18: 1465-1472. Avilion, A.A.; Piatyszek, M.A.; Gupta, J.; Shay, J. .; Bacchetti, Si; Greider, C.W. (1996) Human telomerase RNA and telomerase activity in immortal cell lines and tumor tissues. Cancer Res. 56: 645-650. Bacchetti, S. and Counter, CM. (1995). Telomeres and telomerase in human cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 7: 423-432. Bestilny, L.J.; Brown, C.B.; Miura, Y.; Robertson, L.D.; Riabowol, K.T. (1996) Selective inhibition of telomerase activity during terminal differentiation of immortal cell lines. Cancer Res. 56: 3796-3802. Bisoffi, M.; Chakerian, A.E.; Fore, M.L.; Bryant, J.E.; Hernandez, J.P.; Moyzis, R.K.; Griffith, J.K. (1998) Inhibition of human telomerase by a retrovirus expressing telomeric antisense RNA. Eur. J. Cancer 34: 1242-1249. Blasco, M.A.; Funk, W.; Villeponteau, B.; Greider, C.W. (1995) Functional characterization and developmental regulation of mouse telomerase RNA. Science 269: 1267-1270 Blasco, M.A.; Rizen, M.; Greider, C.W.; Hanahan, D. (1996) Differential regulation of telomerase activity and telomerase RNA during multi-stage tumorigenesis. Nature Genet. 12: 200-204. Blasco, M.A.; Lee, H.-W.; Hande, M.P.; Samper, E.; Landsdorp, P.M.; DePiho, R.A.; Greider, C.W. (1997) Telomere shortening and tumour formation by mouse cells lacking telomerase RNA. Cell 91 : 25-34. Bodnar, A.G.; Ouellette, M.; Frolkis, M; Holt, S.E.; Chiu, C.-P.; Morin, G.B.; Harley, C.B.; Shay, J.W.; Lichtsteiner, S.; Wright, W.E. (1998) Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science 279: 349-352. Borgnes, A.; Neurater, A.; Kullmann, A.; Deggerdal, A.; Lycke, K.; Larsen, F. (1996) Detection of isolated colon carcinoma cells in peripheral blood- or bone marrow mononuclear cell suspensions. Poster "Micrometastasis II", Miinchen, June 1996. Bosnes, M.; Deggerdal, A.; Rian, A.; Korsnes, L.; Larsen, F. (1997) Magnetic separation in molecular biology. Scientific and clinical applications of magnetic carriers. Hafeli et al (ed). Plenum Press, New York. Brien, T.P.; Kallakury, B.V.S.; Lowry, C.V.; Ambros, R.A.; Muraca, P.J.; Malfetano, J.H.; Ross, J.S. (1997) Telomerase activity in benign endometrium and endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Res. 57: 2760-2764. 43 Broccoli, D.; Young, J.W.; de Lange, T. (1995) Telomerase activity in normal and malignant hematopoietic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 9082-9086. Bryan, T.M.; Marusic, L.; Bacchetti, S.; Namba, M.; Reddel, R.R. (1997) The telomere lengthening mechanism in telomerase-negative immortal human cells does not involve the telomerase RNA subunit. Hum. Mol. Gen. 6: 921-926. Burger, A.M.; Double, J.A.; Newell, D.R. (1997) Inhibition of telomerase activity by cisplatin in human testicular cancer cells. Eur. J. Cancer 33: 638-644. Califano, J.; Ahrendt, S.A.; Meininger, G.; Westra, W.H.; Koch, W.M.; Sidransky, D. (1996) Detection of telomerase activity in oral rinses from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Cancer Res. 56: 5720-5722. Chadaneau, C; Hay, K.; Hirte, H.W.; Gallinger, S.; Bacchetti, S. (1995) Telomerase activity associated with acquisition of malignancy in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 55: 2533-2536. Chiu, C.-P.; Dragowska, W.; Kim, N.W.; Vaziri, H.; Yui, J.; Thomas, T.E.; Harley, C.B.; Lansdorp, P.M. (1996) Differential expression of telomerase activity in hematopoietic progenitors from adult human bone marrow. Stem Cells 14: 239-248. Chong, L.; van Steensel, B.; Broccoli, D.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Hanish, J.; Tempst, P.; de Lange, T. (1995) A human telomeric protein. Science 270: 1663-1667. Collins, K. and Greider, C.W. (1993) Tetrahymena telomerase catalyzes nucleocytic clevage and nonprocessive elongation. Genes Dev. 7: 1364-1376. Collins, K.; Kobayashi, R.; Greider, C.W. (1995) Purification of Tetrahymena telomerase and cloning of genes encoding the two protein components of the enzyme. Cell 81 : 677-686. Counter, CM.; Avilion, A.A.; LeFeuvre, C.E.; Stewart, N.G.; Greider, C.W.; Harley, C.B.; Bacchetti, S. (1992) Telomere shortening associated with chromosome instability is arrested in immortal cells which express telomerase activity. EMBO J. 11: 1921-1929. Counter, CM.; Gupta, J.; Harley, C.B.; Leber, B.; Bacchetti, S. (1995) Telomerase activity in normal leukocytes and in hematologic malignancies. Blood 85: 2315-2320. Cunningham, V.J.; Markham, N.; Shroyer, A.L. (1998) Detection of telomerase expression in fine-needle aspirations and fluids. Diagn. Cytopathol. 18: 431-436. Duggan, B.D.; Wan, M.; Yu, M.C; Roman, L.D.; Muderspach, L.I.; Delgadillo, E.; Li, W.-Z.; Martin, S.E.; Dubeau, L. (1998) Detection of ovarian cancer cells: Comparison of a telomerase assay and cytologic examination. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 90: 238-242. 44 Eaton, M.C.; Hardingham, J.E.; Kotasek, D.; Dobrovic, A. (1997) Immunobead RT-PCR: A sensitive method for detection of circulating tumour cells. BioTechniques 22: 100-105. Edington, K.G.; Loughran, O.P.; Berry, I.J.; Parkinson, E.K. (1995) Cellular immortality: a late event in the progression of human squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck associated with p53 alteration and a high frequency of allele loss. Mol. Carcinog. 13: 254- 265. Engelhardt, M.; Kumar, R.; Albanell, J.; Pettengell, R.; Han, E.; Moore, M.A.S. (1997) Telomerase regulation, cell cycle, and telomere stability in primitive hematopoietic cells. Blood 90: 182-193. Feng, J.; Funk, W.D.; Wang, S.-S.; Weinrich, S.L.; Avilion, A.A.; Chiu, C.-P.; Adams, R.R.; Chang, E.; Allsopp, R.C.; Yu, J.; Le, S.; West, M.D.; Harley, C.B.; Andrews, W.H.; Greider, C.W.; Villeponteau, B. (1995) The RNA component of human telomerase. Science 269: 1236-1241. Greider, C.W. and Blackburn, E.H. (1985) Identification of a specific telomere terminal transferase activity in Tetrahymena extracts. Cell 43: 405-413. Greider, C.W. and Blackburn, E.H. (1987) The telomere terminal transferase of Tetrahymena is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme with two kinds of primer specificity. Cell 51 : 887-898. Greider, C.W. and Blackburn, E.H. (1989) A telomeric sequence in the RNA of Tetrahymena telomerase required for telomere repeat synthesis. Nature 337: 331-337. Greider, C.W. (1996) Telomere length regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65: 337-365. Hardingham, J.E.; Kotasek, D.; Farmer, R.N.; Butler, J.-X.; Sage, R.E.; Dobrovic, A. (1993) Immunobead-PCR: a technique for the detection of circulating tumor cells using immunomagnetic beads and the polymerase chain reaction. Cancer Res. 53: 3455-3458. Hardingham, J.E.; Kotasek, D.; Sage, R.E.; Eaton, M.C; Pascoe, V.H., Dobrovic, A. (1995) Detection of circulating tumour cells in colorectal cancer by immunobead-PCR is a sensitive prognostic marker for relapse of disease. Mol. Med. 1 : 789-794. Harle-Bachor, C and Boukamp, P. (1996) Telomerase activity in the regenerative basal layer of the epidermis in human skin and in immortal and carcinoma-derived skin keratinocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 6476-6481. Harley, C.B.; Futcher, A.B.; Greider, C.W. (1990) Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature 345: 458-460. Harley, C.B. (1991) Telomere loss: mitotic clock or genetic bomb? Mutat. Res. 256: 271-282. Harley, C.B. (1995) Telomeres and aging. Telomeres, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 247- 263. Harley, C.B. and Villeponteau, B. (1995) Telomeres and telomerase in aging and cancer. 45 Curr. Opin. Genetics Dev. 5: 249-255. Harrington, L. and Greider, C.W. (1991) Telomerase primer specificity and chromosome healing. Nature 353: 451-454. Harrington, L.; McPhail, T.; Mar, V.; Zhou, W.; Oulton, R.; Program, A.E.S.T.; Bass, M.B.; Arruda, I.; Robinson, M.O. (1997) A mammalian telomerase-associated protein. Science 275: 973- 977. Hayflick, L. (1965) The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp. Cell Res. 37: 614-636. Heine, B.; Hummel, M.; Mϋller, M.; Heicappell, R.; Miller, K.; Stein, H. (1998) Non-radioactive measurement of telomerase activity in human bladder cancer, bladder washings, and in urine. J. Pathol. 184: 71-76. Heukeshoven, J. and Dernick, R. (1988) Improved silver staining procedure for fast staining in PhastSystem Development Unit I. Staining of sodium dodecyl sulfate gels. Electrophoresis 9: 28-33. Hiyama, E.; Hiyama, K.; Yokoyama, T.; Matsuura, Y.; Piatyszek, M.A.; Shay, J.W. (1995a) Correlating telomerase activity levels with human neuroblastoma outcomes. Nature Med. 1 : 249-255. Hiyama, E.; Yokoyama, T.; Tasumoto, N.; Hiyama, K.; Imamura, Y.; Murakami, Y.; Koda a, T.; Piatyszek, M.A.; Shay, J.W. ; Matsuura, Y.; (1995b) Telomerase activity in gastric cancer. Cancer Res. 55: 3258-3262. Hiyama, E.; Hiyama, K.; Tatsumoto, N.; Kodama, T.; Shay, J.W.; Yokoyama, T. (1996a) Telomerase activity in human intestine. Int. J. Oncol. 9: 453-458. Hiyama, E.; Gollahon, L.; Kataoka, T.; Kuroi, K.; Yokoyama, T.; Gazdar, A.F.; Hiyama, K.; Piatyszek, M.A.; Shay, J.W. (1996b) Telomerase activity in human breast tumours. JNCI 88: 116- 122. Hiyama, K.; Hirai, Y.; Kyoizumi, S.; Akiyama, M.; Hiyama, E.; Piatyszek, M.A.; Shay, J.W.; Ishioka, S., Yamakido, M. (1995) Activation of telomerase in human lymphocytes and hematopoietic progenitor cells. J. Immunol. 155: 3711-3715. Hohaus, S.; Voso, M.T.; Barbera, E.O.-L.; Cavallo, S.; Bellacosa, A.; Rutella, S.; Rumi, C; Genuardi, M.; Neri, G.; Leone, G. (1997) Telomerase activty in human hemotopoietic progenitor cells. Haematologica 82: 262-268. Holt, S.E.; Shay, J.W.; Wright, W.E. (1996a) Refining the telomere-telomerase hypothesis of aging and cancer. Nature Biotechnol. 14: 836-839. Holt, S.E.; Wright, W.E.; Shay, J.W. (1996b) Regulation of telomerase activity in immortal cell lines. Mol. Cell Biol. 16: 2932-2939. Hsiao, R.; Sharma, H.S.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Keith, E.; Narayanan, R. (1997) Telomerase activity in normal human endothelial cells. Anticancer Res. 17: 827-832. 46 Kanaya, T.; Kyo, S.; Takakura, M.; Ito, H.; Namiki, M.; Inoue, M. (1998) hTERT is a critical determinant of telomerase activity in renal-cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 78: 539-543. Kannan, S.; Tahara, H.; Yokozaki, H.; Mathew, B.; Nalinakumari, K.R.; Nair, M.K.; Tahara, E. (1997) Telomerase activity in premalignant and malignant lesions of human oral mucosa. Cancer Epidemiolgy, Biomarkers & Prevention 6: 413-420. Kavaler, E.; Landman, J.; Chang, Y.; Droller, M.J.; Liu, B.C-S. (1998) Detecting human bladder carcinoma cells in voided urine samples by assaying for the presence of telomerase activity. Cancer 82:708-714. Kilian, A.; Bowtell, D.D.L.; Abud, H.E.; Hime, G.R.; Venter, D.J.; Keese, P.K.; Duncan, E .; Reddel, R.R.; Jefferson, R.A. (1997) Isolation of a candidate human telomerase catalytic subunit gene, which reveals complex splicing patterns in different cell types. Hum. Mol. Gen. 6: 201 1-2019. Kim, N.W.; Piatyszek, M.A.; Prowse, K.R.; Harley, C.B.; West, M.D.; Ho, P.L.C; Coviello, G.M.; Wright, W.E.; Weinrich, S.L.; Shay, J.W. (1994) Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science 266: 2011-2015. Kim, N.W., and Wu, F. (1997). Advances in quantification and characterization of telomerase activity by the telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP). Nucl. Acids Res. 25: 2595-2597. Kim, N.W. (1997) Clinical implications of telomerase in cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 33(5): 781-786. Kolquist, K.A.; Elliesen, L.W.; Counter, CM.; Meyerson, M.; Tan, L.K.; Weinberg, R.A.; Haber, D.A.; Gerald, W.L. (1998) Expression of TERT in early premalignant lesions and a subset of cells in normal tissues. Nature Genet. 19: 182-186. Kvalheim, Gunnar - Clinical Stem Cell Laboratory, Norwegian Radium Hospital. Personal communication Kyo, S.; Takakura, M.; Kohama, T.; Inoue, M. (1997) Telomerase activity in human endometrium. Cancer Res. 57: 610-614. Le, S.; Zhu, J.J.; Anthony, D.C; Greider, C.W.; Black, P.M. (1998) Telomerase activity in human gliomas. Neurosurgery 42: 1120-1 125. Leber, B. and Bacchetti, S. (1996) Telomeres and telomerase in normal and malignant haemotologic cells. Leuk. Lymphoma 24: 1-9. Lee, M.S. and Blackburn, E.H. (1993) Sequence-specific DNA primer effects on telomerase polymerization activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 6586-6599. Lycke, K.; Kulimann, A.; Bosnes, M.; Larsen, F. (1997) Immunomagnetic enrichment of carcinoma cells from blood and bone marrow combined with RT-PCR for improved detection of micrometastasis. Poster "PCR in Oncology", Heidelberg, April 1997. 47 McClintock, B. (1941) The stability of broken ends of chromosomes in Zea mays. Genetics 26: 234- 282. Meyerson, M.; Counter, CM.; Eaton, E.N.; Elliesen, L.W.; Steiner, P.; Caddie, S.D.; Ziaugra, L.; Beijersbergen, R.L.; Davidoff, M.J.; Liu, Q.; Bacchetti, S.; Haber, D.A.; Weinberg, R.A. (1997) hEST2, the putative human telomerase catalytic subunit gene, is up-regulated in tumor cells and during immortalization. Cell 90: 785-795. Morin, G.B. (1989) The human telomere terminal transferase enzyme is a ribonucleoprotein that synthesizes TTAGGG repeats. Cell 59: 521-529. Morin, G.B. (1991) Recognition of a chromosome truncation site associated with alpha-thalassaemia by human telomerase. Nature 353: 454-456. Moyzis, R.K.; Buckingham, J.M.; Cram, L.S.; Dani, M.; Deaven, L.L.; Jones, M.D.; Meyne, J.; Ratliff, R.L.; Wu, J.-R. (1988) A highly conserved repetetive DNA sequence, (TTAGGG) n , present at the telomeres of human chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 6622-6626. Mϋller, H.J. (1938) The remarking of chromosomes. The Collecting Net- Woods Hole 13: 181-198. Mϋller, M.; Heine, B.; Heicappell, R.; Emrich, T.; Hummel, M.; Stein, H.; Miller, K. (1996) Telomerase activity in bladder cancer, bladder washings and in urine. Int. J. Oncol. 9: 1169-1173. Mϋller, M.; Krause, H.; Heicappell, R.; Tischendorf, J.; Shay, J.W.; Miller, K. (1998) Comparison of human telomerase RNA and telomerase activity in urine for diagnosis of bladder cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 4: 1949-1954. Murakami, J.; Nagai, N.; Ohama, K.; Tahara, H.; Ide, T. (1997) Telomerase activity in ovarian tumors. Cancer 80: 1085-1092. Murakami, J.; Nagai, N.; Ohama, K. (1998) Telomerase activity in body cavity fluid and peritoneal washings in uterine and ovarian cancer. J. Int. Med. Res. 26: 129-139. Nakamura, T.M.; Morin, G.B.; Chapman, K.B.; Weinrich, S.L.; Andrews, W.H.; Ligner, J.; Harley, C.B.; Cech, T.R. (1997) Telomerase catalytic subunit homologs from fission yeast and human. Science 277: 955-959. Nakayama, J-i.; Saito, M.; Nakamura, H.; Matsuura, A.; Ishikawa, F. (1997) TLP1: A gene encoding a protein component of mammalian telomerase is a novel member of WD repeats family. Cell 88: 875-884. Naume, B.; Borgen, E.; Beiske, K.; Herstad, T.-K.; Ravnas, G.; Renolen, A.; Trachsel, S.; Thrane-Steen, K.; Funderud, S.; Kvalheim, G. (1997) Detection of isolated breast carcinoma cells in peripheral blood or bone marrow by immunomagnetic techniques. J. Hematotherapy 6: 103-114. Neurater, A.; Edward, R.; Kilaas, L.; Ugelstad, J.; Larsen, F. (1998) Immunomagnetic separation of animal cells. In Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook, 2nd edtion. Celis, J.E. (editor), Academic Press: 197-204. 48 Norrback, K-F.; Dahlenborg, K.; Carlsson, R.; Roos, G. (1996) Telomerase activation in normal B lymphocytes and non-Hodgin's lymphomas. Blood 88: 222-229. Olovnikov, A.M. (1973) A theory of marginotomy: The incomplete copying of template margin in enzymic synthesis of polynucleotides and biological significance of the phenomenon. J. Theor. Biol. 41: 181-190. Pelkey, T.J.; Frierson Jr., H.F.; Bruns, D.E. (1996) Molecular and immunological detection of circulating tumor cells and micrometastasis from solid tumors. Clin. Chem. 42: 1369-1381. Piatyszek, M.A., Kim, N.W., Weinrich, S.L., Hiyama, K., Hiyama, E., Wright, W.E. and Shay, J.W. (1995). Detection of telomerase activity in human cells and tumors by a telomeric repeat amplification protocol. Meth. Cell. Sci. 17: 1-15. Pluta, A.F.; Dani, G.M.; Spear, B.B.; Zakian, V.A. (1984) Elaboration of telomeres in yeast: Recognition and modification of termini from Oxytricha macronuclear DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81 : 1475-1479. Ramierez, R.D.; Wright, W.E.; Shay, J.W.; Taylor, R.S. (1997) Telomerase activity concentrates in active segments of human hair follicles. J. Invest. Dermatol. 108: 113-117. Savoysky, E., Akamatsu, K., Tsuchiya, M. and Yamazaki, T. (1996). Detection of telomerase activity by combination of TRAP method and scintillation proximity assay. Nucl. Acid Res. 24: 1175- 1176. Sharma, H.W.; Sokoloski, J.A.; Perez, J.R.; Maltese, J.Y.; Sartorelli, A.C; Stein, C.A.; Nichols, G.; Khaled, Z.; Telang, N.T.; Narayanan, R. (1995) Differentiation of immortal cells inhibits telomerase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 12343-12346. Shay, J.W. and Wright, W.E. (1996) Telomerase activity in human cancer. Curr. Op. Oncol. 8: 66- 71. Shay, J.W. and Bacchetti, S. (1997) A survey of telomerase activity in human cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 33: 787-791. Sommerfeld, H.J.; Meeker, A.K.; Piatyszek, M.A.; Bova, G.S.; Shay, J.W.; Coffey, D.S. (1996) Telomerase activity: A prevalent marker of malignant human prostate tissue. Cancer Res. 56: 218- 222. Suehara, N.; Mizumoto, K.; Kusumoto, M.; Niiyama, H.; Ogawa, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yokohata, K.; Tanaka, M. (1998) Telomerase activity detected in pancreatic juice 19 months before a tumor is detected in a patient with pancreatic cancer. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 93: 1967-1971. Sugino, T.; Yoshida, K.; Bolodeku, J.; Tahara, H.; Buley, I.; Manek, S.; Wells, C; Goodison, S.; Ide, T.; Suzuki, T.; Tahara, E.; Tarin, D. (1996) Telomerase activity in human breast cancer and benign breast lesions: Diagnostic applications in clinical specimens, including fine needle aspirates. Int. J. Cancer 69: 301-306. Sugino, T.; Yoshida, K.; Bolodeku, J.; Tarin, D.; Goodison, S. (1997) Telomerase activity and its inhibition in benign and malignant beast leisons. J. Pathol. 183: 57-61. 49 Sumida, T.; Sogawa, K.; Hamakawa, H.; Sugita, A.; Tanioka, H.; Ueda, N. (1998) Detection of telomerase activity in oral lesions. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 27: 111-115. Sun, D.; Hurley, L.H.; Von Hoff, D.D. (1998) Telomerase assay using biotinylated-primer extension and magnetic separation of the products. BioTechniques 25: 1046-1051. Szostak, J.W. and Blackburn, E.H. (1982) Cloning yeast telomeres on linear plasmid vectors. Cell 29: 245-255. Tahara, E.; Semba, S.; Tahara, H. (1996) Molecular biological observations in gastric cancer. Semin. Oncol. 23: 307-315. Taylor, R.S.; Ramirez, R.D.; Ogoshi, M.; Chaffins, M.; Piatyszek, M.A.; Shay, J.W. (1996) Detection of telomerase activity in malignant and non-malignant skin conditions. J. Invest. Dermatol. 106: 759-765. TRAPeze Telomerase Detection Kit Catalog #7700 Kit, 2nd edition, Oncor Inc. Ulaner, G.A.; Hu, J.-F.; Vu, T.H.; Giudice, L.C; Hoffman, A.R. (1998) Telomerase activity in human development is regulated by human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) transcription and by alternative splicing of hTERT transcripts. Cancer Res. 58: 4168-4172. van Steensel, B. and de Lange, T. (1997) Control of telomere length by the human telomeric protein TRF1. Nature 385: 740-743. Vaziri, H.; Dragowska, W.; Allsopp, R.C.; Thomas, T.E.; Harley, C.B.; Landsdorp, P.M. (1994) Evidence for a mitotic clock in human hematopoietic stem cells: loss of telomeric DNA with age. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 : 9857-9860. Vaziri, H. and Benchimol, S. (1998) Reconstitution of telomerase activity in normal human cells leads to elongation of telomeres and extended replicative life span. Curr. Biology 8: 279-282. Watson, J.D. (1972) Origin of concatemeric T7 DNA. Nat. New Biol. 239: 197-201. Weinrich, S.L.; Pruzan, R.; Ma, L.; Ouellette, M.; Tesmer, V.M.; Holt, S.E.; Bodnar, A.G.; Lichtsteiner, S.; Kim, N.W.; Trager, J.B.; Taylor, R.D.; Carlos, R.; Andrews, W.H.; Wright, W.E.; Shay, J.W.; Harley, C.B.; Morin, G.B. (1997) Reconstitution of human telomerase with the template RNA component hTR and the catalytic protein subunit hTRT. Nature Genet. 17: 498-502. Weng, N.-p.; Levine, B.L.; June, C.H.; Hodes, R.J. (1996) Regulated expression of telomerase activity in human T lymphocyte development and activation. J. Exp. Med. 183: 2471-2479. Weng, N.-p.; Levine, B.L.; June, C.H.; Hodes, R.J. (1997a) Regulation of telomerase RNA template expression in human T lymphocyte development and activation. J.Immunol. 158: 3215- 3220. Weng, N.-p.; Granger, L.; Hodes, R.J. (1997b) Telomere lengthening and telomerase activation during human B cell differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 10827-10832. 50 Wright, W.E., Shay, J.W. and Piatyszek, M.A. (1995). Modifications of a telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) result in increased reliability, lineraity and sensitivity. Nucleic Acid Res. 18: 3794-3795. Wright, W.E.; Piatyszek, M.A.; Rainey, W.E.; Byrd, W.; Shay, J.W. (1996) Telomerase activity in human germline and embryonic tissues and cells. Dev. Genet. 18: 173-179. Xu, D.; Gruber, A.; Peterson, C; Pisa, P. (1996) Suppression of telomerase activity in HL60 cells after treatment with differentiating agents. Leukemia 10: 1354-1357. , Yang, C.-T.; Lee, M.-H.; Lan, R.-S.; Chen, J.-K. (1998) Telomerase activity in pleural effusions: Diagnostic significance. J. Clin. Oncol. 16: 567-573. Yasumoto, S.; Kunimura, C; Kikuchi, K.; Tahara, H.; Ohji, H.; Yamamoto, H.; Ide, T.; Utakoji, T. (1996) Telomerase activity in normal human epithelial cells. Oncogene 13: 433-439. Yoshida, K.; Sugino, T.; Goodison, S.; Warren, B.F.; Nolan, D.; Wadsworth, S.; Mortensen, N.J.; Toge, T.; Tahara, E.; Tarin, D. (1997a) Detection of telomerase activity in exoliated cancer cells in colonic luminal washings and its related clinical implications. Br. J. Cancer 75: 548-553. Yoshida, K.; Sugino, T.; Tahara, H.; Woodman, A.; Bolodeoku, J.; Nargund, V.; Fellows, G.; Goodison, S.; Tahara, E.; Tarin, D. (1997b) Telomerase activity in bladder carcinoma and its implication for noninvasive diagonsis by detection of exfoliated cancer cells in urine. Cancer 79: 362-369. Yoshida, K.; Sakamoto, S.; Sumi, S.; Higashi, Y.; Kitahara, S. (1998) Telomerase activity in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 83: 760-766. Yu, G.L.; Bradley, J.D.; Attardi, L.D.; Blackburn, E.H. (1990) In vivo alteration of telomere sequences and senescence caused by mutated Tetrahymena telomerase RNAs. Nature 344: 126-132. Zakian, V.A. (1997) Life and cancer without telomerase. Cell 91 : 1-3. KEY TO THE FIGURES Figure 3 Lane 1 : control with no cells, lane 2: 40 cells, lane 3: 50 cells, lane 4:75 cells, lane 5: 100 cells, lane 6: 500 cells, lane 7: positive control, lane 8: negative PCR control. Figure 4 Lane L: molecular weight ladder (10 bp) Lane 1 : lysate fraction - using 1 million Dynabeads (15 μg) Lane 2: bead fraction - using 1 million Dynabeads Lane 3: lysate fraction - using 10 million Dynabeads (150 μg) Lane 4: bead fraction - using 10 million Dynabeads Lane 5: lysate fraction - using 20 million Dynabeads (300 μg) 51 Lane 6: bead fraction - using 20 million Dynabeads Lane 7: Lysate of 1000 SW480 cells - tested without fractionation Lane 8: 2 μl TSR8 positive control from the kit Figure 5 Lane 1: lysate fraction - using 10 million Dynabeads (150 μg) Lane 2: bead fraction - using 10 million Dynabeads Lane 3: lysate fraction - using 20 million Dynabeads (300 μg) Lane 4: bead fraction - using 20 million Dynabeads Lane 5: lysate fraction - using 30 million Dynabeads (450 μg) Lane 6: bead fraction - using 30 million Dynabeads Lane 7: Negative PCR control Lane 8: 2 μl TSR8 positive control from the kit Figure 6 Lane 1: 50 μg beads, lane2: 100 μg beads, lane 3: 150 μg beads, lane 4: 200 μg beads, lane 5: 250 μg beads, lane 6: 300 μg beads, lane 7: 350 μg beads, lane 8: 400 μg beads and lane 9: positive TRAP assay control. And lane 10: negative PCR control. Figure 7 Lane 1+2: 10,000 cells and the eluate of the bead bound material, lane 3+4: 5000 cells - the eluate of the bead-bound material, lane 5+6: 1,000 cells - eluate of the bead-bound material, lane 7+8: DNA isolated from the lysate of 10,000 cells, Lane 9+10: DNA isolated from the lysate of 5,000 cells, lane 11+12: DNA isolated from lysate of 1,000 cells, lane 13: positive control - lOng placenta DNA, lane 14: negative PCR control, L: Molecular weight standard - 100 bp ladder. Figure 8 Lane H: High molecular weight standard; Lane L: Low molecular weight standard; Lane 1&2: Eluate from beads (extract from 80 000 cells); Lane 3&4: Eluate from beads (extract from 53 000 cells). Figure 9 Lanes 1-5: 50 cells, Lane 6: positive control, Lane 7: negative control. Figure 10 Lane 1: 0 cells; Lane 2: 40 cells; Lane 3: 50 cells; Lane 4: 75 cells; Lane 5: 100 cells; Lane 6: 500 cells; Lane 7: positive control (500 cells directly tested); Lane 8: negative control. Figure 11 Lane 1 : Pleura sample (bead-isolated telomerase); Lane 2: Pleura sample (remaining lysate); Lane 3: Remainder of pleura sample (eluate); Lane 4: Remainder of pleura sample (lysate); Lane 5: Positive control (TSR8 template); Lane 6: Negative control. 52

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method for detecting telomerase activity in a sample, which comprises: (a) treating the sample with a solid phase under conditions to bind telomerase to the solid phase; (b) separating the solid phase from the treated sample to form a test sample which is optionally treated to elute bound telomerase from the solid phase; and (c) assaying the test sample for telomerase activity. 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the solid phase is assayed for telomerase activity in step (c). 3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the sample comprises target whole cells, which are treated in step (a) to form a lysate to release telomerase for binding to the solid phase. 4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the sample comprising the target whole cells comprises a mixture of cell populations which is subjected to a sorting step before step (a) to isolate the target whole cells in the sample. 5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the sorting step comprises flow cytometry sorting or a step of binding the target whole cells to a solid phase affinant for the target whole cells. 6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the affinant is present on the solid phase for binding the telomerase. 7. A method according to claim 5 or claim 6, wherein the affinant comprises an antibody specific to the target cells. 53 8. A method according to any one of claims 5 to 7, wherein the affinant is specific for epithelial cells. 9. A method according to any one of claims 4 to 8, wherein the mixture of cell populations is from blood, bone marrow, a pleural effusion, urine, saliva, sputum, faeces, spinal fluid, a cervical smear, a buccal swab, or a needle biopsy sample. 10. A method for cancer diagnosis or prognosis, comprising a method according to any one of the preceding claims in which the sample is removed from a human or animal subject, wherein detection of telomerase activity is indicative of cancer in the subject. 11. A method for detection of micrometastasis, comprising a method according to claim 9, in which the mixture of cell populations is removed from a human or animal subject, wherein detection of telomerase activity is indicative of micrometastasis in the subject. 12. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the solid phase comprises a particulate material. 13. A method according to claim 12, wherein the particulate material comprises polymeric beads. 14. A method according to claim 13, wherein the polymeric beads have a diameter in the range of from lμ to 6μm. 15. A method according to any one of claims 12 to 14, wherein the particulate material is magnetic. 16. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the step (c) of assaying for telomerase activity uses a telomeric repeat assay protocol. 17. Use of a solid phase for separating telomerase from a sample by treating the sample with the solid phase so as to bind the telomerase thereto. 54 18. Use of a solid phase for detecting telomerase activity in a sample by treating the sample with the solid phase so as to bind the telomerase thereto and assaying the solid phase for telomerase activity. 19. Use of a solid phase according to claim 18, in a method according to any one of claims 1 to 16. 20. A kit for detecting telomerase activity, comprising a solid phase for binding telomerase and one or more components for assaying for telomerase activity. 21. A kit according to claim 20, wherein the solid phase comprises a particulate material. 22. A kit according to claim 21, wherein the particulate material comprises polymeric beads. 23. A kit according to claim 22, wherein the polymeric beads have a diameter in the range of from 1 μm to 6μm. 24. A kit according to any one of claims 21 to 23, wherein the particulate material is magnetic. 25. A kit according to any one of claims 20 to 24, wherein the solid phase comprises an affinant for binding target whole cells. 26. A kit according to any one of claims 20 to 24, which further comprises a second solid phase for binding target whole cells. 27. A kit according to claim 26, wherein the second solid phase comprises an affinant for binding target whole cells. 28. A kit according to claim 25 or claim 27, wherein the affinant comprises an antibody specific to the target cells. 55 29. A kit according to any one of claims 25, 27 or 28, wherein the affinant is specific for epithelial cells. 30. A kit according to any one of claims 20 to 29, wherein the one or more components for assaying telomerase activity comprise a substrate for telomerase elongation. 31. A kit according to claim 30, wherein the substrate for telomerase elongation is present on the solid phase for binding telomerase. 32. A kit according to any one of claims 20 to 31 , wherein the one or more components for assaying telomerase activity comprise components for a telomeric repeat assay protocol. 33. A kit according to any one of claims 20 to 32, wherein the one or more components for assaying telomerase activity include oligonucleotide primers to amplify the telomerase product. 34. Use of a kit according to any one of claims 20 to 33, for the detection of cancer cells. 35. Use according to claim 34, wherein the kit further comprises means for assaying an mRNA diagnostic for cancer. 36. A component of an assay system for detecting telomerase activity, which comprises a solid phase for binding telomerase on which is present a substrate for telomerase elongation. 56

Inventors: LARSEN FRANK, SKAANSENG MARIANNE, LARSEN, FRANK, SKAANSENG, MARIANNE
Applicants: LARSEN FRANK, SKAANSENG MARIANNE, LARSEN, FRANK, SKAANSENG, MARIANNE
Application year: 2000
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: C12N15, C12Q1, G01N33