NOVEL ENZYME

Abstract: A recombinant protein having luciferase activity and at least 60 % similarity to a wild-type luciferase wherein in the sequence of the enzyme, the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in <i>Photinus pyralis</i> luciferase is mutated as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase, such that the luciferase enzyme is able to emit light at a different wavelength as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase and/or has enhanced thermostability as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase. In general, the residue corresponding to 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is changed from an acidic amino acid to a non-acidic amino acid and preferably an uncharged polar amino acid such as tyrosine. Mutant luciferases in accordance with the invention can produce a large (50nm) wavelength shift in emitted light and have good thermostability. The resultant colour shift can be reversed by addition of coenzyme A. These properties make the mutant particularly useful in a variety of assays.

Description: Novel Enzyme The present invention relates to a novel protein, in particular mutant luciferase enzymes which show distinctive properties as compared to corresponding wild type enzyme, to DNA encoding these proteins, to the use of these enzyme in assays and to test kits containing them. Firefly luciferase catalyses the oxidation of luciferin in the presence of ATP, Mg 2+ and molecular oxygen with the resultant production of light. This reaction has a quantum yield of about 0.88. The light emitting property has led to its use in a wide variety of lumino etric assays where ATP levels are being measured. Examples of such assays include those which are based upon the described in EP-B-680515 and WO 96/02665 but many others are used routinely in laboratories. Luciferase is obtainable directly from the bodies of insects, in particular beetles such as fireflies or glow-worms. Particular species from which luciferases have been obtained include the Japanese GEN I or KEIKE fireflies, Luciola crucia ta and Luciola la teralis, the East European firefly Luciola mingrelica, the North American firefly Photinus pyralis and the glow-worm Laiiipyris noctiluca . However, since many of the genes encoding these enzymes have been cloned and sequenced, they may also be produced using recombinant DNA technology. Recombinant DNA sequences encoding the enzymes are used to transform microorganisms such as E. coli which then express the desired enzyme product. The colour of the light emitted by these enzymes when used in assays in the laboratory are broadly similar. It would be helpful if the wavelength could be altered, either to be more easily read by the specific detector, or for use in systems where multiple reporters are required, for example to monitor different events within the same sample. One way of distinguishing reporter molecules is to utilise luciferase molecules which emit light at distinct wavelengths. This may be achieved by using reporter molecules comprising luciferases derived from different species of beetle or glow-worm. An alternative strategy however is to produce mutant luciferases using recombinant DNA technology, so as to produce a variation in the wavelength of the signal. Examples of such mutants are provided in WO 95/18853. Furthermore, the heat stability of wild and recombinant type luciferases is such that they lose activity quite rapidly when exposed to temperatures in excess of about 30°C, particularly over 35°C. This instability causes problems when the enzyme is used or stored at high ambient temperature, or if the assay is effected under high temperature reaction conditions, for example in order to increase reaction rate. Mutant luciferases having increased thermostability are known from EP-A-524448 and WO/95/25798. The first of these describes a mutant luciferase having a mutation at position 217 in the Japanese firefly luciferase, in particular by replacing a threonine residue with an isoleucine residue. The latter describes mutant luciferases having over 60% similarity to luciferase from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis but in which the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 354 of Photinus pyralis or 356 of the Luciola species is mutated such that it is other than glutamate, and in particular is other than glutamate, aspartate, proline or glycine. Co-pending British Patent Application No.9823468.5 and the International Patent Application derived from it, describes further such mutants. In this case, proteins are described which have luciferase activity and at least 60% similarity to wild-type luciferase such as those from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis enzyme, but which include mutations at various positions in the protein, including amongst others, (a) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 216 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis luciferase; or (b) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis luciferase; or (c) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 297 of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola crucia ta or Luciola lateralis luciferase. The applicants have found that by mutating (or introducing) an amino acid at a different position within the luciferase protein, large shifts in the wavelength of the emitted light may be achieved and/or the enzyme has improved thermostability. Furthermore, the proton flux of emitted light may be improved, making the enzyme better suited to in vivo assays where glow kinetics are precluded or in vi tro assays where CoA or other 'glow kinetic inducing' compounds are not present. The present invention provides a recombinant protein having luciferase activity and at least 60% similarity to a wild-type luciferase wherein in the sequence of the enzyme, the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is mutated as compared to the corresponding wild- type luciferase, such that the luciferase enzyme is able to emit light at a different wavelength as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase and/or has enhanced thermostability as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase. Wild-type luciferase sequences which can form the basis of the recombinant forms of the invention include Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis, Hotaria paroula, Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus Lampyris noctiluca , Pyrocoelia nayako, Photinus pennsylvanica or Phrixothrix (railroad-worms - see Biochem. 38 (1999) 8271- 8279) . Bioluminescent enzymes from species that can use the substrate D-luciferin (4, 5-dihydro-2- [6-hydroxy-2~benzothiazolyl] -4- thiazole carboxylic acid) to produce light emission may form the basis of the mutant enzymes of the invention. Particular wild-type luciferase sequences which can form the basis of the recombinant forms of the invention include Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola lateralis, Hotaria paroula, Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus Lampyris noctiluca , Pyrocoelia nayako and Photinus pennsylvanica . In particular, the luciferases are enzymes obtainable from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis enzyme. In Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis enzymes, the appropriate amino acid residue is at position 359 in the sequence. The sequences of all the various luciferases show that they are highly conserved having a significant degree of similarity between them. This means that corresponding regions among the enzyme sequences are readily deter inable by examination of the sequences to detect the most similar regions, although if necessary commercially available software (e.g. "Bestfit" from the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group; see Devereux et al (1984) Nucleic Acid Research 12: 387-395) can be used in order to determine corresponding regions or particular amino acids between the various sequences. Alternatively or additionally, corresponding acids can be determined by reference to L. Ye et al., Biochim. Biophys Acta 1339 (1997) 39-52 which shows the sequences of the enzymes, together with the numbering, which numbering system is to be used in connection with the present application. As regards the possible change of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase, most wild-type sequences have an acid residue (aspartic acid or glutamic acid) at this position. The exception to this is some forms of the luciferase of Photinus pennsylvanica in which the corresponding residue (355) is the non-polar residue, valine or some forms of Phrixothrix luciferase where the corresponding position is V354 in PVGR or in Ph RE , where it is L354 leucine. Thus in general, the amino acid used as a substitute amino acid at this position is other than aspartic acid, glutamic acid, valine or leucine. In most cases, therefore, an acidic amino acid residue is replaced with a non-acidic residue, including basic amino acids such as lysine or arginine, non-polar amino acids such as leucine, valine or isoleucine, uncharged polar amino acids such as tyrosine, asparagine, glutamine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan or threonine. In particular, it may be replaced with an uncharged polar amino acid such as tyrosine, asparagine, serine or threonine. Particularly preferred amino acid residues for substitution at this position are tyrosine, phenylalanine or tryptophan and most preferably tyrosine. Generally speaking, aromatic residues at this position give rise to the largest shifts and may also assist thermostability. Where wild-type sequences include non-acidic amino acid residues at this position, they are suitably mutated into different non-acidic residues. It has been found that by mutating the enzyme in this way, the wavelength of light emitted by the luciferase is shifted, in some cases up to 50nm towards the red end of the spectrum. Thus, D357Y mutant Photinus pyralis luciferase emits light at a wavelength of some 612nm as compared to the wild-type enzyme which emits light at a wavelength of 562nm. A wavelength shift of 50nm has considerable potential for use in assay applications as a shift of this magnitude can be readily defined spectrally. Different coloured luciferases could be employed as reporter molecules in gene expression studies, enabling the simultaneous monitoring of more than one gene, for example as described in WO 95/18853. Multiple analyte testing could also be performed with luciferase as labels . The fact that the light in this case is a deep red in colour is particularly useful in assay methodology. A red mutant could be useful when analysing a solution for ATP which contained pigments or other compounds which may absorb shorter wavelengths of light. For example, a red coloured solution would not absorb red light. Examples of red coloured solutions which are frequently the subject of such analysis include blood samples or a solution of eukaryotic cell culture medium which may contain a red coloured pH indicator. When using a mixture of colourimetric agents such as luciferases, the ability to generate a deep red signal may be helpful, particularly where another agent in the sample generates a green signal. A photomultiplier tube used in photocathode spectral analysis can be set to detect either one or both peaks generated in a single sample. In other words, it is possible to distinguish between photon flux from a red and green emitter in the same sample. Furthermore, it has been found that the wavelength shift can be affected by the presence of the cofactor coenzyme A (CoA) . This feature gives rise to the possibility that this enzyme could be used in an assay for the cofactor. As described below, the effect the cofactor coenzyme A on the in vitro spectrum of emitted light was investigated. As the concentration of coenzyme A increases the spectral distribution alters and at the highest concentrations of CoA the spectrum is dominated by wavelengths in the region 590-630nm with a pronounced peak at 610nm. Thus in accordance with a further aspect of the invention, there is provided an assay for determining the presence in a sample of CoA, which assay comprises adding to a sample suspected of containing CoA, luciferase as described above together with other reagents which are required to bring about a luciferase/luciferin reaction, measuring the wavelength of light emitted from the sample and relating this to the presence or absence of CoA. Such an assay may be useful in the detection of the state of growth or activity of cells, for example microorganisms or eukaryotic cells. For example, the concentration of CoA in E. coli cells is relatively high, and varies considerably with metabolic status. The mutant enzymes of the invention can be used to monitor the metabolic status of an organism, particularly the in vivo concentration of the CoA, since the wavelength of the emission varies depending upon the CoA concentration. Such assays may be particularly useful in situations where CoA is an important primary metabolite in the production of antibiotics (e.g. in streptomycetes) . Cellular CoA concentrations are also an important indicator of fatty acid biosynthesis and vary with the starvation status of the cell. A number of metabolic disorders such as carcinogenesis and diabetes, show abnormalities in the fatty acid metabolites and consequently unusual CoA levels. Assays of the invention may be used in the diagnosis of such conditions. For example, the CoA levels from within a cell sample, such as a blood sample, from a patient, may be determined by measuring the wavelength of light emitted from a luciferase of the invention, used in the assay. This result may be compared with that obtained from a sample of healthy cells to determine whether the wavelength has changed and thus that a modified CoA level is present. This may be indicative of a disease state in the patient. Cells are suitably lysed prior to assay using a known lytic agent. It is believed that the amino acid residue at position 357 is critically associated with the binding site of coenzyme A. When the surface of the luciferase enzyme was contoured (using SYBL protein modelling software, Tripos Ltd.) to a resolution of 1 Angstrom (A) , a small polar pocket was noted. This pocket appears to be lined by residues H310, E354 and D357 and measured between 8-lθA. When viewed from the top of the molecule, this pocket appears as part of a larger pocket, lined by residues H310, E354, D357 and 1232. Residues H310 and E354 appear to form a bridge across the cleft giving the appearance of two smaller pockets (See Figure 8) . Without being bound by theory, it seems possible that the bridging residues may be flexible enough to disengage when the enzyme is in solution to provide a larger pocket (~12A deep and ~8A wide) which allows CoA binding. This is consistent with the energy calculations. When E. coli cells expressing mutants of firefly luciferase of the invention were grown on different carbon sources changes in the in vivo spectrum of emitted light were observed. Switching from a rich medium (LB) to a defined minimal medium with either acetate or glucose as the sole carbon source resulted in shifts to longer wavelengths of emitted light and a reduction in the contribution from shorter wavelengths. This may provide yet a further means of controlling the wavelength of light emitted for assay purposes. Mutation of the 357 position of in the protein has been found to result in enhanced thermostability. The proteins may contain further mutations in the sequence provided the luciferase activity of the protein is not unduly compromised. The mutations suitably enhance the properties of the enzyme or better suit it for the intended purpose in some way. This may mean that they result in enhanced thermostability and/or colour shift properties, and/or the K m for ATP of the enzymes. Examples of mutations which give rise to colour shifts are described in W095/18853. Mutations which affect K m values are described for example in WO 96/22376 and International Patent Application No. PCT/GB98/01026. In general, effects of mutations have been found to be additive in terms of alterations in the properties. The mutant luciferases of the invention may include other specific mutations which enhance thermostability as compared to wild-type luciferase. In particular, at least one of (a) the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 354 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase (356 in Luciola luciferase) is mutated; (b) the amino acid residue corresponding to position 215 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or (217 in Luciola luciferase) is a different hydrophobic amino acid; or (c) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 216 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola lateralis luciferase; (d) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase; (e) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 297 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase; (f) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 14 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 16 of Luciola mingrelica, or 17 in Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis; (g) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 37 of Luciola mingrelica, or to residue 38 of Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis; (h) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 105 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 106 of Luciola mingrelica , 107 of Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis or 108 of Luciola lateralis gene; (i) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 234 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 236 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis; (j) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 420 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 422 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis; (k) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 310 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 312 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola lateralis ; is different to the amino acid which appears in the corresponding wild type sequence and wherein the luciferase enzyme has increased thermostability as compared to an enzyme having the amino acid of the corresponding wild-type luciferase at this position. Thus preferred examples of proteins of the invention are mutated wild-type luciferases where more than one amino acid, for example up to 100 amino acid residues, preferably no more than 40 amino acids, and more preferably up to 30 amino acids, are different to the amino acid at the corresponding position in the appropriate wild-type enzyme. Thus, in one preferred embodiment, the protein of the invention comprises luciferase of Photinus pyralis , wherein, in addition to the mutation at the 357 position as described above, at least one of; a) the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 354 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than glutamate; (b) the amino acid residue corresponding to position 215 in Pho tinus pyralis luciferase or is a hydrophobic amino acid other than alanine; (c) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyral is luciferase is other than threonine; (d) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyral is luciferase is other than isoleucine; (e) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than phenylalanine; (f) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 14 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than phenylalanine; (g) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than leucine; (h) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 105 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than alanine; (i) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 234 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than aspartic acid; (j) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 420 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than serine; (k) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 310 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than histidine. Alternatively, the protein of the invention comprises protein the luciferase sequence of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis enzyme, and wherein, in addition to the mutation at position 359 as described above, at least one of a) the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 356 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than glutamate; (b) the amino acid residue corresponding to position 215 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or is a hydrophobic amino acid other than alanine or threonine; (c) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 216 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis luciferase is other than glycine (for Luciola mingrelica based sequences) or aparagine (for Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis) based sequences; (d) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase is other than serine; (e) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 297 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase is other than leucine; (f) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 16 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola la teralis is other than phenylalanine; (g) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 37 of Luciola mingrelica , or 38 in Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis is other than lysine; (h) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 106 of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis is other than glycine; (i) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 236 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola la teralis is other than glycine; (j) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 422 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis is other than threonine; (k) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 312 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis is other than threonine (for Luciola mingrelica based sequences) or valine (for Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis) based sequences . The particular substituted amino acids in any case which give rise to enhanced thermostability can be determined by routine methods as illustrated hereinafter. In each case, different substitutions may result in enhanced thermostability. Substitution may be effected by site-directed mutagenesis of DNA encoding native or suitable mutant proteins as would be understood by the skilled person. The invention in this case is associated with the identification of the positions which are associated with thermostability. In general however, it may be desirable to consider substituting an amino acid of different properties for the wild type amino acid. Thus hydrophilic amino acid residues may, in some cases be preferably substituted with hydrophobic amino acid residues and vice versa. Similarly, acidic amino acid residues may be substituted with basic residues. For instance, the protein may comprise a protein having luciferase activity and at least 60% similarity to luciferase from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis enzyme wherein in the sequence of the enzyme, at least one of; (a) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 216 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis luciferase is mutated and is other than threonine in the case of Photinus pyralis luciferase; or (b) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis luciferase is mutated and is other than isoleucine in the case of Photinus pyralis luciferase; or (c) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 297 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis luciferase is mutated and is for example, other than phenylalanine in the case of Photinus pyralis luciferase; and the luciferase enzyme has increased thermostability as compared to the wild-type luciferase. The sequences of all the various luciferases show that they are highly conserved having a significant degree of similarity between them. This means that corresponding regions among the enzyme sequences are readily determinable by examination of the sequences to detect the most similar regions, although if necessary commercially available software (e.g. "Bestfit" from the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group; see Devereux et al (1984) Nucleic Acid Research 12: 387-395) can be used in order to determine corresponding regions or particular amino acids between the various sequences. Alternatively or additionally, corresponding acids can be determined by reference to L. Ye et al., Biochim. Biophys Acta 1339 (1997) 39-52. With respect to the possible change of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase, the polar amino acid threonine is suitably replaced with a non polar amino acid such as alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine, tryptophan or cysteine. A particularly preferred substitution for the threonine residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis is alanine. A more preferred substitution is cysteine. However, different polar residues such as asparagine at this position may also enhance the thermostability of the corresponding enzyme having threonine at this position. Other amino acids which appear at this position in wild-type luciferase enzymes include glycine ( Luciola mingrelica , Hotaria paroula) , asparagine (Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus , GR, YG, YE and OR, Luciola crucia ta , Luciola lateralis, Lampyris noctiluca , Pyrocelia nayako Photinus pennsylvanica LY, KW, J19) and serine ( Phrixothix) . These may advantageously be substituted with non-polar or different non-polar side chains such as alanine and cysteine. As regards the possible change of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase, the nonpolar amino acid isoleucine is suitably replaced with a different non polar amino acid such as alanine, glycine, valine, lecine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine, tryptophan or cysteine. Other amino acids appearing at this position in wild type sequences include serine and asparagine. Suitably, these polar residues are substituted by non-polar residues such as those outlined above. A particularly preferred substitution for the residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase at group is alanine . Changes of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 297 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase, may also affect the thermostability of the protein. (This corresponds to position 292 in Phrixothix luciferase.) In general, the amino acid at this position is a non-polar amino acid phenylalanine or leucine. These are suitably changed for different non-polar amino acids. For example, in Photinus pyralis, the non-polar amino acid phenylalanine is suitably replaced with a different non polar amino acid, such as alanine, leucine, glycine, valine, isoleucine, proline, methionine, tryptophan or cysteine. A particularly preferred substitution for the phenylalanine residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is leucine. Mutation at the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 14 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to amino acid 16 in Luciola luciferase (13 in Phrixothrix luciferase) is also possible. This amino acid residue (which is usually phenylalanine, but may also be leucine, serine, arginine or in some instances tyrosine) is suitably changed to a different amino acid, in particular to a different nonpolar amino acid such as alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan, preferably alanine. Mutation at the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to amino acid residue 37 in Luciola mingrelica luciferase (38 in other Luciola spp.) may also be effective. This amino acid varies amongst wild type enzymes, which may include leucine ( Photinus pyralis) but also lysine, histidine, glycine, alanine, glutamine and aspartic acid at this position. Suitably the amino residue at this position is substituted with a non-polar amino acid residue or a different non-polar amino acid such as alanine, valine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan. A preferred amino acid at this position is alanine, where this is different to the wild-type enzyme. Mutations at the amino acid corresponding to position 14 of the Photinus pyralis sequence and/or mutation at the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase are preferably not the only mutation in the enzyme. They are suitably accompanied by others of the mutations defined above, in particular those at positions corresponding to positions 214, 395 or 232 of Photinus pyralis luciferase. Changes of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 105 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 106 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola lateralis luciferase, (102 in Phrixothrix) may also affect the thermostability of the protein. In general, the amino acid at this position is a non- polar amino acid alanine or glycine, or serine in Phrixothrix. These are suitably changed for different non-polar amino acids. For example, in Photinus pyralis, the non-polar amino acid alanine is suitably replaced with a different non polar amino acid, such as phenylalanine, leucine, glycine, valine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan. A particularly preferred substitution for the alanine residue corresponding to residue 105 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is valine. Changes of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 234 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 236 of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis luciferase (231 in Phrixothrix) , may also affect the thermostability of the protein. In general, the amino acid at this position is aspartic acid or glycine and in some cases, glutamine or threonine. These are suitably changed for non-polar or different non-polar amino acids as appropriate. For example, in Photinus pyralis, the amino acid residue is aspartic acid is suitably replaced with a non polar amino acid, such as alanine, leucine, glycine, valine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan. A particularly preferred substitution for the phenylalanine residue corresponding to residue 234 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is glycine. Where a non-polar amino acid residue such as glycine is present at this position (for example in Luciola luciferase) , this may be substituted with a different non-polar amino acid. Changes of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 420 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 422 of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis luciferase (417 in Phrixothrix green and 418 in Phrixothrix red), may also affect the thermostability of the protein. In general, the amino acid at this position is an uncharged polar amino acid serine or threonine or glycine. These are suitably changed for different uncharged polar amino acids. For example, in Photinus pyralis, the serine may be replaced with asparagine, glutamine, threonine or tyrosine, and in particular threonine. Changes of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 310 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 312 of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis luciferase, may also affect the thermostability of the protein. The amino acid residue at this position varies amongst the known luciferase proteins, being histidine in Photinus pyralis, Pyrocelia nayako, Lampyris noctiluca and some forms of Photinus pennsylanvanica luciferase, threonine in Luciola mingrelica , Hotaria paroula and Phrixothix (where it is amino acid 307) luciferase, valine in Luciola crucia ta and Luciola lateralis, and asparagine in some Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus luciferase. Thus, in general, the amino acid at this position is hydrophilic amino acid which may be changed for a different amino acid residue which increases thermostability of the enzyme. A particularly preferred substitution for the histidine residue corresponding to residue 310 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is arginine. Other mutations may also be present in the enzyme. For example, in a preferred embodiment, the protein also has the amino acid at position corresponding to amino acid 354 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase (356 in Luciola luciferase) changed from glutamate, in particular to an amino acid other than glycine, proline or aspartic acid. Suitably, the amino acid at this position is tryptophan, valine, leucine, isoleucine are asparagine, but most preferably is lysine or arginine. This mutation is described in WO 95/25798. It has been found that hydrophobic residues at this position enhance the wavelength shift of the enzyme, Furthermore, the presence of a large hydrophobic (V or I) , polar (N) or positively charged (K or R) amino acid at position 354 enhances thermostability. In an alternative preferred embodiment, the protein also has the amino acid at the position corresponding to amino acid 217 in Luciola luciferase (215 in Photinus pyralis) changed to a hydrophobic amino acid in particular to isoleucine, leucine or valine as described in EP-A-052448. Proteins of the invention include both wild-type and recombinant luciferase enzymes. They have at least 60% similarity to wild sequences such as those of Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis enzyme in the sense that at least 60% of the amino acids present in the wild-type enzymes are present in the proteins of the invention. Such proteins can have a greater degree of similarity, in particular at least 70%, more preferably at least 80% and most preferably at least 90% to the wild-type enzymes listed above. Similar proteins are of this type include allelic variants, proteins from other insect species as well as recombinantly produced enzymes. They can be readily identified in that they are encoded by nucleic acids which hybridise with sequences which encode wild-type enzymes under stringent hybridisation conditions. Such conditions would be well understood by the person skilled in the art, and are exemplified for example in Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press) . In general terms, low stringency conditions can be defined as 3 x SCC at about ambient temperature to about 65°C, and high stringency conditions as 0.1 x SSC at about 65°C. SSC is the name of a buffer of 0.15M NaCl, 0.015M trisodium citrate. 3 x SSC is three times as strong as SSC and so on. In particular, the similarity of a particular sequence to the sequences of the invention may be assessed using the multiple alignment method described by Lipman and Pearson, (Lipman, D.J. & Pearson, W.R. (1985) Rapid and Sensitive Protein Similarity Searches, Science, vol 227, ppl435-1441) . The "optimised" percentage score should be calculated with the following parameters for the Lipman-Pearson algorithm: ktup =1, gap penalty =4 and gap penalty length =12. The sequences for which similarity is to be assessed should be used as the "test sequence" which means that the base sequence for the comparison, such as the sequence of Photinus pyralis or any of the other sequences as recorded in Ye et al., supra., should be entered first into the algorithm. Particular examples of proteins of the invention are wild-type luciferase sequence with one or more of the mutations as outlined above. The invention further provides nucleic acids which encode the luciferases as described above. Suitably, the nucleic acids are based upon wild-type sequences which are well known in the art. Suitable mutation to effect the desired mutation in the amino acid sequence would be readily apparent, based upon a knowledge of the genetic code. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the nucleic acid is a synthetic gene. Suitably, the synthetic gene is engineered to remove codons rarely found in highly expressed genes from common expression hosts such as E. coli and, at the same time, avoid the introduction of codons rarely found in genes coding for beetle luciferases. This approach ensures that the new gene has a codon utilisation that is optimal for both E. coli and insect expression systems. For example, wherever possible the codons for the amino acids arg, leu, ile, gly and pro were changed to CGT or CGC (arg) , CTG, CTT or CTC (leu), ATC or ATT (ile), GGT or GGC (gly), and CCG CCA or CCT (pro), thus eliminating rare codons. In the case of the synthetic gene illustrated below (SEQ ID NO 1) and in Figure 14, this resulted in a total of 139 silent mutations creating 62 new non-rare codons (11% of the total) . The first 8 nucleotides shown in Figure 14 form part of the ribosome binding site and thus do not code. The coding sequence begins with the methionine residue indicated by an up arrow. This coding sequence and closely similar sequences, for example sequences which have at least 90% similarity or preferably at least 95% similarity form a preferred aspect of the invention. Another useful feature which may be employed when producing a synthetic assembly is the incorporation of new unique restriction sites. These sites make mutagenesis, in particular combinatorial cassette mutagenesis, of the gene simpler and more efficient. In particular, it may be desirable to create unique restriction sites within the cDNA coding for subdomain B in the enzyme. Additionally creation of a unique restriction site at the extreme 3' end of the gene to allow simple fusions and/or removal of the peroxisome targeting sequence may be advantageous . In the example illustrated hereinafter, nine new unique restriction sites were engineered, mostly in the central third of the gene, and a unique Hind III site was generated at the extreme 3' end of the gene to allow for simple C-terminal fusions (Figure 12) . Finally, use of a synthetic gene allows for the introduction of mutations to increase the thermostablilty of the gene product, or to otherwise modify the properties of the product as desired. In the Example illustrated hereinafter for instance, three non-silent mutations were engineered to introduce the thermostabilising amino acid changes T214C, E354K and D357F into the polypeptide. The nucleic acids of the invention are suitably incorporated into an expression vector such as a plasmid under the control of control elements such as promoters, enhancers, terminators etc. These vectors can then be used to transform a host cell, for example a prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell such as a plant or animal cell, but in particular a prokaryotic cell such as E. coli so that the cell expresses the desired luciferase enzyme. Culture of the thus transformed cells using conditions which are well known in the art will result in the production of the luciferase enzyme which can then be separated from the culture medium. Where the cells are plant or animal cells, plants or animals may be propagated from said cells. The protein may then be extracted from the plants, or in the case of transgenic animals, the proteins may be recovered from milk. Vectors, transformed cells, transgenic plants and animals and methods of producing enzyme by culturing these cells all form further aspects of the invention. The Photinus pyralis D357Y mutant luciferase was created by random mutagenesis as described hereinafter. It was found that the D357Y single point mutation produces a large colour shift in the wavelength of light emitted and also has greater thermostability than wild type luciferase. Further investigations have revealed that a range of substitutions at this position give rise to good thermostability and/or to large colour shifts. Particular examples of mutant enzymes of Photinus pyralis which fall within the scope of the invention include the following: D357Y D357F D357W D357K D357N D357I E354I/D357Y E354V/D357Y E354C/D357Y E354R/D357Y E354S/D357Y E354N/D357Y E354K/D357M E354R/D357L E354W/D357W E354H/D357W E354R/D357F E354K/D357F E354S/D357F E354M/D357F E354A/D357R E354A/D357F E354T/D357Y E354A/D357N I351M/E354R/D357V E354S/D357V E354R/D357W E354R/D357M E354R/D357S E354N/D357S or equivalents of any of these when derived from the luciferases of other species. The mutations for the creation of the above mutants were introduced to the luciferase gene on plasmid pET23 by site- directed mutagenesis, (PCR) or combinatorial cassette mutagenesis. The oligonucleotides added to the PCR reaction in order to effect the relevant mutations are given below. It has been reported previously that the effect of point mutations at the 354 and 215 positions are additive. This invention provides the possibility of combining three or more such mutations to provide high thermostability in a mutant enzyme which has a large colour shift. Luciferase proteins of the invention will advantageously be employed in any bioluminescent assay which utilises the luciferase/luciferin reaction as a signalling means. There are many such assays known in the literature. The proteins may therefore be included in kits prepared with a view to performing such assays, optionally with luciferin and any other reagents required to perform the particular assay. The invention will now be particularly described by way of example with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings in which: Figure 1 is a log graph showing % remaining activity versus time of 45°C incubation of several mutant enzymes in accordance with the invention; Figure 2 shows the spectral peaks obtained by incubating E. coli cells expresing luciferase enzymes in a citrate buffer with D-luciferin where where the enzyme used is (a) recombinant wild-type Photinus pyralis luciferase, (b) a D357K mutant, (c) a D357N mutant, (d) a D357W mutant, (e) a D357I mutant, (f) a D357F mutant, (g) a D357Y mutant and (h) a double mutant E354I + D357Y; Figure 3 is a graph showing the % remaining activity versus time of three mutant enzymes, E354I, D357Y and the double mutant (DM) E354I/D357Y; Figure 4 shows the emission spectra of (a) recombinant wild type enzyme and (b) the double mutant (DM) E354I/D357Y; Figure 5 is a graph showing the rate decay of photon emissions of recombinant wild-type (♦) r-wt and a D357K mutant enzyme (!) • Figure 6 shows molecular modelling diagram, illustrating a potential CoA binding pocket within the luciferase enzyme; Figure 7 shows the in vivo bioluminescent spectra emitted by E. coli cells expressing mutant P. pyral is luciferase D357Y (a) growth on LB; (b) growth on minimal medium and sodium acetate; (c) growth on minimal medium and glucose; Figure 8 shows the in vivo bioluminescent spectra emitted by E. coli cells expressing mutant P. pyralis luciferase E354K/D357M (a) growth on LB; (b) growth on minimal medium and sodium acetate; (c) growth on minimal medium and glucose; Figure 9 is a graph showing the effect of CoA on spectral distribution of light emitted by mutant P. pyralis luciferase D357Y; Figure 10 is a graph showing the normalised data of the effect of CoA on spectral distribution of light emitted by mutant P. pyralis luciferase D357Y; Figure 11 is a graph showing the effect of CoA on spectral distribution of light emitted by mutant P. pyralis luciferase E354I/D357Y (Figure 11a) and normalised data (Figure lib); Figure 12 illustrates the restriction sites modifications utilised in the construction of a synthetic luciferase gene; Figure 13 illustrates constructs used in the synthesis of a luciferase gene; Figure 14 shows the cDNA sequence (SEQ ID NO 1) of the synthetic luciferase gene (including nucleotides 1-8 which form part of the ribosome binding site but are not coding) and the encoded amino acid sequence which starts at the methionine residue indicated by the up arrow (SEQ ID NO 2) ; and Figure 15 illustrates the thermostability of mutants including the mutant encoded by the synthetic gene at 50°C. Example 1 Identification and Characterisation of Mutant Luciferase Two libraries of firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase, created used error-prone PCR [M. Fromant et al . , Anal. Biochem. (1995) 224, 347-353], were prepared. One library comprised of error- prone PCR products of the full length luc gene, cloned into the T7 expression system pET23a, (Novagen Inc., Madison, WI, U.S.A.). A second library consisted of the error-prone PCR products of a short section of the luc gene, covering amino acids 199-352, cloned in the vector pBSK(+), (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, U.S.A. ) . The pET23a library was expressed in E. coli strain BL21(DE3), (E. coli B F dcm ompT hsdS(rB _ m B " ) galλ (DE3) ) . The pBSK(+) library was expressed in HB101 E. coli cells, ( supE44 aral4 galK2 lacYl Δ ( gpt-proA) 62 rpsL20 ( Str r ) xyl -5 mtl - 1 recAl 3 Δ (mrcC-mrr) HsdS ' ( r ' m ~ ) . pET23a and pBSK(+) both carry the gene for β-lactamase and confer ampicillin resistance to E. coli cells harbouring the plasmid. An E. coli strain was transformed with the prepared library by electroporation, using a BIORAD E. coli Pulser, and grown overnight at 37°C on LB agar, containing ampicillin at a concentration of 50μg/ml. The cells were transferred to nylon membranes, (Osmonics, Minnetonka, Minnesota, U.S.A.), and sprayed with luciferin solution (500μM D-luciferin, potassium salt, in lOOmM sodium citrate buffer, pH 5.0). The colonies were viewed using an Alphalmager™ 1200 Documentation and Analysis System (Flowgen, Lichfield, Staffordshire, UK) . This integrated the bioluminescence emitted over a specified period of time to produce an image of the light emitted by the colonies. The brightness of luminescence was taken as an indication of the thermostability of luciferase. The colonies were then screened for thermostability. Colonies were selected on the basis of brightness of light emitted and were isolated for further characterisation. In some screens, the E. coli colonies were incubated at 42°C for 2 hours prior to screening so that the thermostable mutants could be selected. Colonies isolated from the primary screen were patched onto nylon membranes and also grown overnight in LB medium containing ampicillin. The patches were sprayed with luciferin solution and viewed in the Alphalmager™. This secondary screen helped to positively identify clones for in vitro analysis of luciferase activity. E. coli clones expressing possible thermostable enzymes were assayed in vitro for luciferase activity and thermostability. In vitro assays for luciferase activity were performed at room temperature using the Promega Luciferase Assay System (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, U.S.A.). The luciferase reaction was initiated by the addition of lOμl crude cell extract to lOOμl Promega Luciferase Assay Cocktail (1 in 2 dilution) . The resultant bioluminescence was measured using a Biotrace M3 luminometer. Crude cell extracts were prepared as described in the Promega technical bulletin no. 101. Aliquots of E. coli overnight cultures were lysed in cell culture lysis reagent, (25mM Tris- phosphate pH7.8, 2mM dithiothreitol (DTT) , 2mM 1,2- diaminocyclohexame-N,N,N' ,N' -tetraacetic acid, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.25 mg/ml hen lysozyme) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Crude lysate were then stored on ice prior to assay. The properties of the enzymes were further tested in time- dependent inactivation studies. Eppendorf tubes containing 50μl aliquots of crude cell extract were incubated in a water bath at a given temperature. At set time points tubes were removed and cooled on ice prior to assay. Remaining luciferase activity was expressed as a percentage of the original activity. Log graphs of percentage remaining activity versus time of incubation were plotted and used to calculate tι /2 values. Tι 2 is the time taken for the enzyme to lose 50% of its original activity after incubation at a given temperature. T1/2 values, (time for activity to reduce to 50% of original activity) , were determined in crude extracts at 37°C from log graphs of % remaining activity versus time (not shown) . Plasmid DNA from E. coli clones expressing the most thermostable luciferase as determined above, was sequenced in order to determine the mutations responsible for the thermostability of the enzyme. Plasmid DNA was prepared using the QIAGEN QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit, (QIAGEN Ltd, Crawley, W. Sussex, UK), following the protocol for using a microcentrifuge (QIAprep Miniprep Handbook 04/98) . All DNA sequencing was undertaken by Babraham Tech nιx , Cambridge, UK, using an ABI PRISM™ 377 DNA Sequencer and the ABI PRISM™ BigDye™ Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Perkin Elmer Applied Biosystems) which is based upon the dideoxy chain termination method [F. Sanger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, (1977) 5463-5467]. As a result of this work, the novel mutant D357Y was identified. The crystal structure of luciferase [E. Conti et al., Structure, 4 (1996) 287-298] shows that position 357 is situated on the surface of the protein and is close to position 354, which can affect both thermostability and spectral properties. This indicates that this region could be important in terms of the thermostability of the enzyme. D357Y is a particularly thermostable mutant, being the most thermostable luciferase, with a single amino acid change. Example 2 Site-Directed Mutagenesis to create other 357 mutants In order to evaluate different mutations at the 357 position, site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the Stratagene QuikChange™ Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit, (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, U.S.A.). The plasmid pPW601a J54, (PJW, MoD Report, 3/96), was used in all site-directed mutagenesis. All products of the mutagenesis reactions were transformed into E. coli strain XLl-Blue, [ el 4 ' (mcrA ~ ) A (mcrCB-hsdSMR-mrr) 1 71 endAl supE44 thi-1 gyrA96 relAl la c recB recJ sbcC umuC: : Tn5 (Kan r ) uvrC [ F' proAB la cl q ZΔM15 Tn 10 ( Tet r ) Amy Cam r ] ] Oligonucleotide primers were synthesized by Sigma-Genosys Ltd., Cambridge, UK and were designed using an intelligent doping system [A.R Arkin et al., Bio-technology, (1992)10, 297-300, W, . Huang et al., Anal. Biochem. 218, 454-457] were used to design degenerate oligonucleotide primers to produce groups of possible mutations rather than using individual primers for each amino acid substitution. In this way, libraries of amino acid substituted luciferase mutants were produced. The following oligonucleotides (and their complementary partners) were used: Oligonucleotide Primer (5'->3' Amino Acid Substitution cacccgagggggat [tat] aaaccgggcgcgg (SEQ ID NO 4) cacccgagggggat [ (gac) (tc) (c) ] aaaccgggcgcggtcgg A,I,L,T,V,P (SEQ ID NO 5) cacccgagggggat [ (t) (gat) (gc) ] aaaccgggcgcggtcgg C,F,L,W, Y,X (SEQ ID NO 6) cacccgagggggat [ (ac) (ga) (gc) ] aaaccgggcgcggtcgg R,S,K,N,H,Q (SEQ ID NO 7) The libraries of mutants were screened as previously for thermostability. The number of colonies to be screened was calculated using the equation [S. Climie et al., J. Biol. Chem. 265 (1990) 18776-18779] N = [ln(l-P)]/[ln((n-l)/n)] Where N is the number of colonies to be screened, n is the number of possible codons at the target position and P is the probability that every codon in the mixture is sampled for screening at least once. The calculation was based on P=0.95. The mutants obtained from site-directed mutagenesis were assayed for luciferase activity and characterised in time- dependent thermoinactivation studies. Mutants identified as desirable in this way were grown in 400ml LB medium, containing ampicillin, to A 2 6o * 0.5. Luciferase expression was then induced by addition of isopropyl β- thiogalactoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of lmM. The cells were then incubated at 30°C, with shaking, for 3 hours prior to harvesting by centrifugation. The resultant cell pellet was resuspended in 10ml B-PER™ Protein Extraction Reagent, (Pierce Chemical Company, Rochford, U.S.A.), lmM DTT to produce a crude extract, following the B-PER™ protocol for Maxi-Scale Bacterial Protein Extraction. Reconstituted Sigma Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, 500μl, (Product No. P8465, Sigma, Saint Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.), was added to the B-PER™ solution to inhibit endogenous proteases. The cell lysate was then centrifuged at 30 OOOg for 30 minutes. The supernatant of the crude extract was subjected to fractionation with ammonium sulphate. The fraction that precipitated between 30% and 55% saturation contained luciferase activity. This material was resuspended in 0.5ml Tris HCl pH8.0, lmM DTT and used for thermoinactivation and spectral studies. The replacements D357L, T, V, W, R, I, S, K, N and F were introduced. These mutants were characterised in in vitro thermoinactivation studies of crude extracts. The partially purified extracts were diluted, 1 in 11, into a thermoinactivation buffer: 50mM potassium phosphate buffer pH7.8 containing 10% saturated ammonium sulphate, lmM dithiothreitol and 0.2% BSA. HOμl aliquots of protein solution were incubated at 40°C or 45°C for set periods of time and cooled on ice prior to assay. Luciferase activity was then measured as described in Example 1, using Promega Luciferase Assay Reagent (1 in 2 dilution) . The results are shown in Tables 2 & 3 and in Figure 1. Tl/2 values were determined in crude extracts at 40°C (Table 2) and 45°C (Table 3) . Table 2 Table 3 All the substitutions displayed enhanced thermostability in comparison to recombinant wild type. Example 3 Changes in Wavelength of Emitted Light Amino acid replacements at position 357 were also observed to affect the in vivo spectra of light emitted by the enzyme. An aliquot, (250μl), of E. coli cell cultures, as described in Example 2 were grown overnight at 37°C, was spun down in a microcentrifuge and the supernatant removed. Cells expressing different mutant luciferases were incubated in a citrate buffer (pH5.0) containing 150μl D-luciferin and the light emitted from the in vivo reaction was analysed by measuring the emission spectra using a SPECTRAmax ® Microplate Spectrofluorometer, (Molecular Devices Corp. California, U.S.A.). Large changes in the spectral peak as well as the distribution of wavelengths was observed for the mutants D357Y, F and I (Figure 2 (a) -(g)). These results are summarised in Table 4 below. In addition, the in vivo luminescence of the mutants was assessed by eye in a dark room. The D357 mutants displayed a variety of colours in their luminescence spectra. In particular, D357Y, F and I showed significant shifts to longer wavelengths of emitted light. In some cases, (e.g. D357F) , the change in colour of light emission appeared to be due, not only to a shift in A ™ax , but to a difference in contributions to the spectra from different wavelengths of visible light. Table 4 Recombinant wild type (r-wt) enzyme was used for comparison of λmax of in vivo light emission of some of the 357 mutants. D357Y, F and I display considerable shifts in their wavelength maxima. Example 4 Enzyme properties in the presence or absence of CoA D357Y was partially purified by ammonium sulphate precipitation, as described in the Example 1. This partially purified D357Y enzyme (5μl) was mixed with 150μl Promega Luciferase Assay Reagent. Another aliquot was mixed with an equivalent assay buffer in which CoA is absent, (25mM Tris Tricine pH7.8, 5.0mM MgS0 4 , 0. lmM EDTA, 2mM DTT, 470μM D- luciferin, 530μM ATP) . The emission spectra of the two reactions were measured and are shown in Figures 9 and 10. The spectra display a marked difference in bioluminescent emission in the absence and presence of CoA, with dramatic shift in λmax- The effect of CoA on the kinetics of the luciferase reaction can also be seen by in the difference in RLU scales. (RLU - Relative Light Units). This difference in emission gives rise to the possibility of using the enzyme in an assay to detect the presence of CoA. Example 5 Preparation and Properties of Double Mutant Using site-directed mutagensis as described in Example 2, a double mutant of E354I + D357Y was engineered in order to study any cumulative effects upon thermostability and colour of light emission. The partially purified double mutant, E354I + D357Y, was diluted, 1 in 11, into a thermoinactivation buffer: 50mM potassium phosphate buffer pH .8 containing 10% saturated ammonium sulphate, lmM dithiothreitol and 0.2% BSA. HOμl aliquots of protein solution were incubated at 45°C for set periods of time and cooled on ice prior to assay. Luciferase activity was then measured as previously, using Promega Luciferase Assay Reagent (1 in 2 dilution) . The double mutant displayed a marked increase in thermostability in comparison to the single mutants E354I and D357Y individually, (see Figure 3) . Thermoinactivation studies of partially purified double mutant confirmed the increased thermostability of the mutant, giving a tι/2 value of 7.7 min when inactivated at 45°C. It was noted that the double mutant displays a much deeper red colour of luminescence than the individual mutants of E354I and D357Y, displaying additivity of colour of luminescence. The emission spectra of recombinant wild type and the crude extract of the double mutant E354I + D357Y were also measured using the assay buffer described in Example 3. Emission spectra measured in vivo give a λm ax of βllnm. However, the spectrum has a greater contribution of luminescence from the red region of wavelengths, leading to its deeper red appearance when visualised by eye. Emission spectra in crude extracts displayed a definite change in spectral shape and a wavelength shift of 44nm, relative to rWT, (see Figure 4) . The in vivo emission spectrum of the double mutant shows both a sharpening of the bandwidth for the peak wavelength of emitted light (613nm) and a decrease in the contribution from wavelengths of light in the region 540-560nm. The dramatic effect of these mutations indicates the importance of this region of the enzyme to the colour of bioluminescent light. Example 6 Improved Photon Flux The in vivo bioluminescence of E. coli cells expressing the mutant D357K was observed to be very bright relative to the other mutants at this position. The flash kinetics of this enzyme was analysed using a luminometer, which could measure the rate of photon emission over time. Aliquots of E. coli cell free extracts containing recombinant wild type enzyme or the mutant D357 were added to a luciferase assay cocktail, which did not contain any reagents that would promote glow kinetics e.g. coenzymeA. The rate of decay of photon emission was measured over time (15s) for both enzymes was observed to be significantly slower for the mutant D357K (Figure 4) . In other words the mutant enzyme has reaction kinetics, which are inhibited to a lesser degree, over at least the first 15 seconds of the reaction, than the recombinant wild type enzyme. Example 7 Combinatorial cassette mutagenesis at positions E354 and D357 Step 1 Engineering plasmid pPW601aJ54 for cassette mutagenesis Two new unique restriction sites were introduced into the luc gene, in the plasmid pPW601a/J54, using two pairs of synthetic oligonucleotides (see below) . A total of six silent mutations introduced a Spel and a Kpnl restriction site, 63 base pairs apart, within the gene. Plasmid containing these new sites was called pPW601aJ54SpeI/Kpnl . The presence and proximity of these restriction sites makes it possible to use combinatorial cassette mutagenesis to explore the effects of random substitutions at amino acid positions 354 and 357 in the primary sequence of firefly luciferase. Spel (a) 5' -gggctcactgagactacTAGTgctattatgattacacccg-3 # nt!021- ntl060 (SEQ ID NO 8) Spel (b) 5' -cgggtgtaatcagaatagcACTAgfcagtctcagtgagccc-3' (SEQ ID NO 9) Kpnl (a) 5' -ggcgcggtcggtaaagtGgtAccattttttgaagcg-3' nt!078- ntlll3 (SEQ ID NO 10) Kpnl (b) 5' -cgcttcaaaaaatggTacCactttaccgaccgcgcc-3' (SEQ ID NO 11) Nucleotides highlighted in bold form the endonuclease recognition site and those in upper case the position of the point mutations necessary to create the site. Step 2 Cassette design and library construction A pair of synthetic oligonucleotides was synthesised which when annealed created a double stranded cassette which could be ligated directly into plasmid pPW601aJ54SpeI/KpnI digested at the new restriction sites. The cassette was designed to introduce all possible combinations of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids at positions 354 and 357 in the primary sequence . Looplib2A 5'- ctagtgctattctgattacacccNNG/CggggatNNG/Caaaccgggcgcggtcggtaaagtg gta-3' (SEQ ID NO 12) Looplib2B 5'- cactttaccgaccgcgcccggtttG/CNNatccccG/CNNgggtgtaatcagaatagca-3' (SEQ ID NO 13) 2μg of each of the loop library oligonucleotides was mixed in a buffer containing 50mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 25mM NaCl, and heated to 100°C for 3min. This solution was then cooled slowly in a heating block to <50°C to anneal the complimentary sequences. The annealed oligonucleotides were then ligated into plasmid pPW601aJ54SpeI/KpnI, which had been digested with Spel and Kpnl. Aliquots of the ligation reaction were then used to transform E. coli HB101 cells using electroporation. After electroporation transformed cells were plated out on LB agar plates containing 50μg/ml ampicillin and grown overnight at 37°C. The following day 869 colonies were picked at random from the plates and used to inoculate 1ml of LB containing ampicillin in 96 square-well plates (Beckman) . The plates were covered and the cells grown overnight at 37°C with shaking. Step 3 In vivo screening the randomly selected clones The next morning 50μl aliquots of the stationary phase overnight cultures were transferred to two clear plastic round bottom 96 well microtitre plates (Dynex) . One plate was covered and incubated on a heated block for 8 minutes (block surface temperature 45°C) whilst the other was kept at 37°C. The in vivo luciferase activity in the cells from both plates was then detected and recorded, at room temperature, by adding 50μl of a lOOmM sodium citrate buffer pH 5.0 containing 0.5mM D-luciferin to the wells and then transferring the plate to a video camera imager capture system (Alpha Imager) . The light emitted by the heated and control cultures was integrated over 1 or 2 minutes and the image recorded on thermal paper film. Seventy-nine cultures exhibiting the greatest bioluminescence, as determined by the brightness of the image recorded on film, were selected for a second round of screening. This time the cultures were incubated for 16 minutes on the heating block prior to being assayed. Of the 55 clones selected from the in vivo thermostability screens 25 were chosen for in vivo spectral analysis. These clones were grown overnight in LB at 37°C and the next morning 200ul of the overnight cultures was centrifuged and the E. coli cell pellets were resuspended in 150μl of lOOmM sodium citrate buffer pH 5.0 containing 0.5mM D- luciferin. The resuspended cells were then placed in a white plastic microtitre plate and the in vivo bioluminescent emission spectrum emitted by each of the mutant luciferases was analysed using a Molecular Devices Spectramax 96 well plate fluorimeter. The results are summarised in the Table 1 below. Step 4 Identification of mutations Plasmid DNA was prepared from the 25 clones selected by in vivo screening and sequenced using gene specific sequencing primers. Mutations resulting in amino acid changes at positions 354 and 357 in the primary sequence were identified. One mutant, also contained an additional mutation resulting in an amino acid substitution at position 1351 (Table 5) . Table 5 Mutant Mutations Peak Wavelengths (nm) Enzyme 1 E354V/D357Y 614 2 E354I/D357Y 612 3 E354C/D357Y 612 4 E354R/D357Y 600 5 E354S/D357Y 612 6 E354N/D357Y 608 7 E354K/D357M 556,606 8 E354R/D357L 588 9 E354W/D357W 610 10 E354H/D357W 606 11 E354R/D357F 596 12 E354K/D357F 608 Mutant Mutations Peak Wavelengths (nm) Enzyme 13 E354S/D357F 610 14 E354M/D357F 610 15 E354A/D357R 556 16 E354A/D357F 610 17 E354T/D357Y 612 18 E354A/D357N 560 19 I351M/E354R/D357V 606 20 E354S/D357V 556,608 21 E354R/D357W 600 22 E354R/D357M 596 23 E354R/D357S 592 24 E354N/D357S 600 rWT E354/D357 552 where rWT signifies recombinant wild-type. A number of mutant luciferases were selected from the in vivo assays for thermostability. The majority of these luciferases also show large changes in the in vivo spectrum of emitted light with many showing greater contributions from longer wavelengths of light (>580nm) . A number of spectra also showed a significant narrowing of bandwidth around a single peak of 610-614nm. Replacements of E354 and D357 with a hydrophobic and an aromatic amino acid respectively e.g. E354V, D357Y results in the largest change in the in vivo spectrum which shows a single peak, of narrow bandwidth, around 612nm. Example 8 Tn vitro screening for thermostability Cell free extracts of the selected clones were prepared by lysis and the thermostability of the luciferase from each extract was determined in a thermal inactivation experiment. 50μl of each extract was placed in an eppendorf tube and incubated in a waterbath heated to 45°C for 4, 9 and 16 minutes At the appropriate timepoint the aliquot was removed and the remaining luciferase activity measured. Table 6 shows the percent remaining activity versus time for all mutant enzymes as well as recombinant wild type. Table 6 where "nd" indicates not done. The results indicate that the most thermostable luciferases were those with an aromatic amino acid at position 357 (Y, F or W) and a large hydrophobic (V or I) , polar (N) or positively charged (K or R) amino acid at position 354. Example 9 Effect of growth conditions on the in vivo spectrum of emitted light. The effect of different carbon sources on the spectrum of emitted light from E. coli BL21(DE3) cells expressing mutant luciferases D357Y or E354K + D357M (7 above) was investigated. A 50ml culture of cells was grown to mid log phase on LB medium and then harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellet was resuspended in 1ml of sterile distilled water and a lOOul aliquot of this suspension was then used to inoculate 5ml of fresh LB, M9 minimal medium + 2mM sodium acetate or M9 minimal medium + 2mM glucose in a 25ml Sterilin tube. The cultures were allowed to continue growing, at 37°C with shaking, and after 90 minutes (D357Y) or 120 minutes (enzyme 7) a 200μl aliquot of cells was removed centrifuged and resuspended in 150ul of lOOmM sodium citrate buffer pH 5.0 containing 0.5mM D-luciferin. The resuspended cells were then placed in a microtitre plate and the in vivo bioluminescent emission spectrum emitted by each of the mutant luciferases was analysed using a Molecular Devices Spectramax 96 well plate fluorimeter. The results are shown in Figures 7 and 8. The results show that switching from a rich medium (LB) (Figure 7a, 8a) to a defined minimal medium with either acetate (Figure 7b, 8b) or glucose (Figure 7c, 8c) as the sole carbon source resulted in shifts to longer wavelengths of emitted light and a reduction in the contribution from shorter wavelengths. Example 10 Purification and spectral characterisation of recombinant wild type, and mutant luciferases Recombinant wild type Photinus pyralis enzyme and the mutant luciferases D357Y and E354I + D357Y were purified to homogeneity in order to analyse the effect of the cofactor coenzyme A on the spectrum of the bioluminescent reaction. All three luciferases were purified as fusions to a 143 amino acid carbohydrate binding module (CBM) from the anaerobic fungus Piromyces equii . This CBM has been shown to bind selectively to acid swollen cellulose and the soluble carbohydrates galactomannan and glucomannan, forming the basis for a simple single step affinity purification scheme. Luciferases fused to the CBM can be bound to cellulose in crude cell free extracts, washed, and then eluted selectively using soluble polysaccharides. Fusion proteins purified this way were used in assays to measure the wavelengths of emitted light in reactions containing different amounts of coenzyme A. Enzyme (5μl) was added to lOOμl of assay reagent, 25mM Tris-Tricine pH 7.8, 5.0mM MgS04, 0. lmM EDTA, 530μM ATP and 470μM D-luciferin, containing different amounts of coenzyme A. Figures 9-11 show the effect of increasing concentrations of coenzyme A on the spectrum of light emitted by the purified luciferases D357 and E354I + D357Y. In vivo assays of the spectrum of bioluminescent light emitted by E. coli cells expressing firefly luciferase fused to the C- terminus of the fungal CBM did not show any significant differences from cells expressing the native luciferase Similarly, in vitro assays of the spectrum of bioluminescent light emitted by a commercial source of purified recombinant luciferase (Promega) were identical to the spectrum emitted by the fusion protein. The observed differences are therefore associated with the concentrations of CoA. As the concentration of coenzyme A increases the spectral distribution alters and at the highest concentrations of CoA the spectrum is dominated by wavelengths in the region 590-630nm with a pronounced peak at 610nm. The spectral shift is most marked for the double mutant where there is a significant narrowing of bandwidth around a single peak of wavelength 610nm (Figure 11) . Example 12 Production of synthetic Photinus pyralis luciferase mutated such that it has 214C/354K/357F A synthetic luc gene was designed and assembled from oligonucleotide pairs using the synthesis strategy outlined above. The gene sequence was engineered to create a luciferase with the amino acids 214C, 354K and 357F. Twenty-nine pairs of overlapping synthetic oligonucleotides were synthesised by Sigma-Genosys Ltd, purified by PAGE and ligated in three assemblies of approximately 550bp (IDRIS 1,2 & 3, Figure 13) . Each assembly was then ligated separately into the vector pBSK(+) and the resulting constructs were used to transform E. coli XLl-Blue cells. Plasmid DNA was prepared from clones containing the assembled inserts and sequenced to confirm the fidelity of the ORFs . The presence of n-1 oligonucleotides (by-products of the oligosynthesis) in the assemblies complicated the build process. DNA sequencing identified a single correct assembly of IDRIS 2 and the PCR was used to correct one assembly of IDRIS 3 which contained a single base pair deletion at the 5' end of the construct. Assembly of the complete ORF was achieved by ligating a mixture of plasmids containing IDRIS 1 with IDRIS 2 and 3. The ligated DNA was then used to transform E. coli XLl-Blue cells and clones expressing active enzyme were selected using an in vivo assay. Several clones were selected and sequenced to confirm the presence and fidelity of the synthetic luc gene having the sequence shown in Figure 14. The complete ORF was called IDRIS (FA) . The synthetic gene was assembled into the vector pBSK(+) between the BamH I and Sal I sites in the polylinker. In this position the gene is not in frame with the alpha peptide and is a significant distance from the lac promoter. However, enough luciferase is produced to enable preliminary characterisation of the enzyme. Crude cell free extracts of E. coli XLl-Blue cells expressing IDRIS (FA) were prepared, from overnight cultures, using the Promega lysis method. The thermostability of the enzyme in the extract was then tested at 50°C over 20 minutes and compared with the thermostable mutant E354I+D357Y. The new codon optimised triple mutant was significantly more thermostable than the mutant E354I+D357Y (Figure 15) .

Claims: Claims 1. A recombinant protein having luciferase activity and at least 60% similarity to a wild-type luciferase wherein in the sequence of the enzyme, the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is mutated as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase, such that the luciferase enzyme is able to emit light at a different wavelength as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase and/or has enhanced thermostability as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase. 2. A recombinant protein according to claim 1 wherein the said wild-type luciferase sequence is of luciferase from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola la teralis, Hotaria paroula , Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus Lampyris noctiluca , Pyrocoelia nayako or Photinus pennsylvanica . 3. A recombinant protein according to claim 2 wherein the wild type luciferase sequence is the sequence of an enzyme obtainable from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis enzyme. 4. A recombinant protein according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein said wild-type luciferase sequence is of luciferase from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis, Hotaria paroula, Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus Lampyris noctiluca or Pyrocoelia nayako and the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than aspartic acid or glutamic acid. 5. A recombinant protein according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein said wild-type luciferase sequence is of luciferase from Photinus pennsylvanica and the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than valine. 6. A recombinant protein according any one of the preceding claims wherein the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than aspartic acid, glutamic acid or valine. 7. A recombinant protein according any one of the preceding claims wherein the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is an uncharged polar amino acid. 8. A recombinant protein according to claim 7 wherein the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is tyrosine, phenylalanine or tryptophan. 9. A recombinant protein according to claim 8 wherein the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is tyrosine. 10. A protein according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the protein has at least 80% similarity to luciferase from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica , Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis . 11. A protein according to any one of the preceding claims which has at least one of the following mutations as compared to wild type luciferase: (a) the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 354 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase (356 in Luciola luciferase) is mutated; (b) the amino acid residue corresponding to position 215 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or (217 in Luciola luciferase) is a different hydrophobic amino acid; (c) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 216 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase; (d) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase; (e) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 297 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola la teralis luciferase; (f) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 14 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 16 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis; (g) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 37 of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola crucia ta or Luciola lateralis; (h) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 105 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 106 of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola cruciata or Luciola la teralis; (i) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 234 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 236 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis; (j) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 420 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 422 of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola crucia ta or Luciola lateralis; (k) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 310 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 312 of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola cruciata or Luciola la teralis; is different to the amino acid which appears in the corresponding wild type sequence and wherein the luciferase enzyme has increased thermostability as compared to an enzyme having the amino acid of the corresponding wild-type luciferase at this position. 12. A protein according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 354 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase (356 in Luciola luciferase) is mutated. 13. A protein according to claim 12 wherein the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 216 of Luciola mingrelica , Luciola crucia ta or Luciola la teralis luciferase is mutated to a different hydrophobic amino acid. 14. A nucleic acid which encodes a luciferase according to any one of the preceding claims. 15. A nucleic acid according to claim 14 which comprises a synthetic gene. 16. A nucleic acid according to claim 14 wherein the codon usage has been optimised for a particular expression host and/or unique restriction sites have been introduced. 17. A nucleic acid according to claim 14 or claim 15 which comprises nucleotides 9-1661 of SEQ ID NO 1, or a sequence which has at least 90% similarity thereto. 18. A vector comprising a nucleic acid according to any one of claims 14 to 17. 19. A cell transformed with a vector according to claim 18. 20. A method of producing a protein according to any one of claims 1 to 13, which method comprises culture of a cell according to claim 19. 21. The use of a protein according to any one of claims 1 to 13 in a bioluminescent assay. 22. A kit comprising a protein according to any one of claims 1 to 13. 23. A kit according to claim 22 which further comprises luciferin. 24. An assay for determining the presence in a sample of CoA, which assay comprises adding to a sample suspected of containing CoA, luciferase as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11 above together with other reagents which are required to bring about a luciferase/luciferin reaction, measuring the wavelenght of light emitted from the sample and relating this to the presence or absence of CoA. 25. An assay according to claim 24 for use in diagnosis of diabetes .

Inventors: MURPHY MELENIE JANE, PRICE RACHEL LOUISE, SQUIRRELL DAVID JAMES, WHITE PETER JOHN, WILLEY TARA LOUISE, MURPHY, MELENIE, JANE, PRICE, RACHEL, LOUISE, SQUIRRELL, DAVID, JAMES, WHITE, PETER, JOHN, WILLEY, TARA, LOUISE
Applicants: MURPHY MELENIE JANE, PRICE RACHEL LOUISE, SECR DEFENCE, SQUIRRELL DAVID JAMES, WHITE PETER JOHN, WILLEY TARA LOUISE, MURPHY, MELENIE, JANE, PRICE, RACHEL, LOUISE, SQUIRRELL, DAVID, JAMES, THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE, WHITE, PETER, JOHN, WILLEY, TARA, LOUISE
Application year: 2000
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: C12N1, C12N5, C12N9, C12N15, C12Q1, C12R1