A PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Abstract: A performance management system (1) has a database (9) with KPI (10), Results & Ratings (11), and configuration date (12) tables. Configuration functions (8) configure the system to the environment and information management functions perform raw data capture and processing. The configuration functions (8) include a data dictionary function for formulation of calculation rules, and an objective wizard function for configuring objectives.

Description: "A Performance Management System" INTRODUCTION Field of the Invention The invention relates to a performance management system for use in a processing environment in which the people resources account for a large proportion of the operational cost and therefore, associated costs and revenues are dependent on the successful management of the performance of this resource in terms of productivity, quality and behaviour. Prior Art Discussion Heretofore, much work has been carried out on development of contact centre functionality such as switches/ACDs, fax gateway, e-mail, web, Customer Relationship Management, quality and workforce management systems. For example, United States Patent Specification No. US5206903 (AT & T) describes automatic call distribution equipment which routes calls according to agent skills. European Patent Specification No. 0740450A2 (IBM) also describes such a system. PCT Patent Specification No. WO99/60766 (Callscan) describes a system to optimise human resource allocation in a call centre environment. The system includes a knowledge base, a call activity monitor, and a performance reference model. All of these developments to date focus on the following categories; CONTACT MANAGEMENT ACD's, Fax Gateways, IVR, E-Mail, Web - to manage and either automatically handle or route customer contacts according to configurable routing criteria. WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT Workforce Management Systems - used primarily to forecast anticipated workloads and the scheduling of the corresponding resources required to achieve self-imposed service level goals. QUALITY ASSESSMENT Quality Systems - focused on the monitoring and evaluation of the quality of customer contacts. CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT "CRM" Systems - focused on consolidating the different customer process systems into a single front-end and providing the employee with a contact history so that the customer queries can be handled better and resolved more efficiently. Whilst all of these systems have disparate primary functions, they all create detailed and important management information which form part of the overall picture of performance in any organisation. Objects of the Invention An objective of the invention is to provide an organisation with a single source for performance measurement information and a configuration tool to allow an organisation to manipulate and exploit this data to provide all the users with a consolidated view of their own performance or that of their teams, departments, sites or business units. This is referred to in this specification as "information management". A second objective is to provide the end-users (mainly agents, team leaders and managers) with a process for managing performance, the process comprising the following. Performance Review - to facilitate individual review of one's own performance. Appraisal management - to provide more consistency and objectivity around the review/ appraisal process. Personal Development Plan - to ensures that all training and development efforts are more closely linked to the business objectives. Reward Manager - calculation of reward points and the administration of a gift process to promote improved fairness and staff motivation. The combination of these is referred to in this specification as "performance management" . SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION According to the invention, there is provided a performance management system comprising:- configuration functions comprising:- a call centre configuration function for configuring call centre parameters in a configuration dataset, and a data dictionary function for formulating under user instruction, calculation rules, value inputs for rules and storage parameters for database fields; a plurality of information management functions each comprising means for capturing raw data from an external customer services system, for processing said data, and for storing the processed data according to the data dictionary- configuration; and a database for storing processed data and a user interface comprising means for integrating with the configuration and performance management functions. In one embodiment, the configuration functions comprises an objective wizard function for configuring objectives for agent and team performance. In one embodiment, the objective wizard function comprises means for prompting input of objective description, appraisal definition, and a rating calculation. In one embodiment, the configuration function comprise an objective group configuration function comprising means for defining under user instructions on objective group of objects having the same appraisal definitions and weightings associated with objectives. In another embodiment, the configuration function comprises a KPI wizard function comprising means for prompting user input of organisation-level ratings and thresholds. In a further embodiment, the configuration functions comprise a KPI group review configuration function comprising means for grouping KPIs together for reporting purposes, and the performance management functions comprise a KPI group review function comprising means for outputting group review data. In a further embodiment, the performance management functions comprise a personal performance review function comprising means for allowing controlled agent access to personal performance data generated according to configured agent objectives. Preferably, the personal performance review function comprises means for allowing an agent to input comments associated with his or her personal performance data. In one embodiment, the personal performance review function comprises means for allowing a team leader to plan and record agent development against objectives, and for allowing an agent to access his or her personal development data. In one embodiment, the system further comprises functions for configuring and processing rewards in recognition of agent performance against objectives. In another embodiment, the user interface, the configuration functions, and the performance management functions together have a structure of classes for instantiating objects in a visual layer, a business logic layer, and a data services layer. In one embodiment, the business logic class instantiates business logic objects having code of a configuration or an information function, and means for terminating the object at the end of a user session. In one embodiment, the business logic layer executes on a business server. In a further embodiment, wherein the data services layer comprises a class for instantiating data services objects residing on a database server and means for terminating said objects after a user session. In one embodiment, the system comprises a transaction server for executing data services layer functions. In another embodiment, the transaction server comprises means for maintaining a pool of data services objects together and for maintaining a pool of database connections. In one embodiment, dynamic library links for the objects are registered using proxy stub pairs on both a client and a server. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Brief Description of the Invention The invention will be more clearly understood from the following description of some embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which :- Fig. 1(a) is an overview block diagram of a Performance Management System of the invention; Fig. 1(b) is a diagram illustrating the physical architecture of the Performance Management System; Fig. 2(a) is a block diagram illustrating the main functions of the Performance Management System; and Figs. 3 to 7 are sample screen shots illustrating aspects of the Performance Management System Description of the Embodiments Referring to Fig. 1(a). there is shown a Performance Management System 1 for the management of performance in a customer services environment and reporting on same. The system 1 interfaces with external performance measurement systems 2 comprising a switch 3, a work force manager 4, and third party systems 5 that store performance measurement data within a structured database and can produce reports on either employee, application, departmental or organisational performance. The external systems 2 do not form part of the invention, however the interface with these systems (API's and Integration Engine) are a part of the invention, as they allow raw data to be formatted and imported into the Performance Management System. The system 1 comprises information management functions 6 which use data from a KPI (Key Performance Indicator) table 10 and a Results & Ratings table 11 within a database 9 to perform calculations pertaining to individual performance of employees, in addition to the overall performance within the customer services centre. The information management functions 6 interact with an HTML user interface 7 to display to the end-user the results of the calculations performed on performance. The database 9 also contains configuration data tables 12. The contents of these tables allow the system 1 to be tailored to suit individual organisations, thus minimising the need for bespoke development of the system to suit particular business operations. The configuration data is captured through the use of configuration functions 8 and a Windows ™-based interface 13, which provides the user with a GUI to specify the unique characteristics of the organisation. At a high level, the database 9 captures raw data from the external systems 2 in a structured manner using APIs, however, flat-file reports may alternatively be used. The raw data is processed by an integration engine 18 according to requirements configured in the integration engine. The performance data is provided in real time via the HTML user interface 7 in response to appropriate requests/enquiries. The performance data may relate to individual customer service agents, to teams, or to overall departments and even site locations. Performance is measured against objectives set up during configuration, and also against KPIs. Like objectives, KPIs have targets but are not rated. However they do not relate to persons, but instead to an organisation or department as a whole. The architecture of the system 1 is shown in Fig. 1(b). It has a three-tier architecture, which consists of a user interface layer 15 supporting the functions 7 and 13, a business services layer 16 supporting the functions 6 and 8, and a data services layer 17 supporting the database 9. The functions are instantiated as objects from user interface, business logic, and a data services classes. Objects are instantiated for a task such as a user enquiry session and are terminated at the end. User Interface 15 There are two types of user interface :- A) The Browser Interface 7 1. This consists of a set of Web classes that reside on a Web server. 2. They send HTML to a client browser. 3. The primary role of the browser is to view the data in a variety of ways i.e. graphically, tabular, by day, by month, by year. 4. The browser front-end allows the measurement and management of performance. The measurement is by viewing the data in a variety of forms, and the management is by allowing the user to specify (according to his security privileges) targets, development plans, comments and even override results B) The Windows Interface 13 1. This consists of a set of forms which reside in the user interface layer 15 2. It sends the configuration data directly to the business services layer 3. The primary role of the Windows interface is to configure the browser and determine the behaviour of the data within the system 1. 4. The Windows interface allows 'tailoring' of the system to meet the specific requirements and characteristics of the contact management centre, thus omitting the need for expensive customisation of the product. Business Services Layer 16 The business services layer 16 has the following attributes: 1. It performs all calculations and all validations 2. It resides on a business server Data Services Layer 17 The data services layer 17 has the following attributes: 1. It accesses the database 9 for the required data 2. It resides on a data server A server process called "Overnights" is executed by the system every day. It has two main functions: 1. It imports data from the external system 2 (KPI data can be imported every half hour whilst all other data is imported once a day) 2. It performs the performance management calculations (results & ratings calculations /recalculation) The product is distributed over multiple servers. A Web server hosts the browser interface 7. This holds all of the ASP and Web Classes A business server hosts all of the business objects of the business layer 17. All data processing occurs on this server and therefore this uses the most resources. The Windows GUI 13 directly accesses the business server 16, whilst the browser UI 7 access the business server through the Web server. A data server hosts data services objects in addition to the actual database 9. The business server calls the data services object, which then in turn retrieves the data from the database 9. Transaction Server (MTS) The Performance Management System 1 utilises a transaction server in the following way: 1. It handles all of the database transactions between the objects in the business layer and the objects in the data services layer 2. It holds a pool of objects together 3. It maintains a pool of database connections 4. It allows improved scalability and performance Dynamic Library Links (DLLs) are registered using proxy stub pairs on both the servers and on the client. When a function 6 requires the DLL, the proxy stub pairs direct the function to the DLL stored on the server. The proxy stub pairs therefore enable the objects to communicate with each other across multiple servers. Referring now to Fig. 2, the configuration functions 8 include: 20 Call Centre Configuration 21 Hierarchy Maintenance 22 Data dictionary maintenance 23 Employee Maintenance Utility 24 Appraisal rating Group Configuration 25 Performance Exception Codes The information management functions 6 include :- 30 Personal Development Status Configuration 31 Personal Development Action Configuration 32 Skill Configuration 33 Personal Development Plan 40 Reward Configuration Utility 41 Reward Statement & Ordering 42 Reward Manager Utility 43 Reward Points Editor 50 Objective Wizard 51 Objective Group Configuration 60 Manual Results Entry 61 Performance Review 62 Manual Ratings Entry 70 Appraisal Manager Configuration 71 Appraisal Manager 80 Report Manager Configuration 81 Report Manager The call centre configuration function 20 is used via the Windows interface to construct the conceptual organisational hierarchy. The organisation can configure up to ten hierarchical levels. Fig. 3(a) shows an example for an organisation that has seven levels from agent through to the global organisation view. The screen of Fig. 3(b) then allows the user to determine functional access (at the browser end) to the various performance management functions for each level as specified in the system hierarchy in Fig. 3(a). This is inputted in a simple Yes/No cellular structure. Because the defined organisational hierarchy forms a basis for the operation of many other functions, amendments to the same can only be made by a senior systems administrator with the appropriate access and user rights. The function 20 is coded in Visual Basic and refers to the characteristics of the customer services centre. After the call centre configuration has been defined a hierarchy configuration is then set up for each site using the function 21. The fields completed for site configuration are call centre name, call centre ID, year and week start values, system days, close off data, currency mask and a moratorium value. The data dictionary maintenance function 22 allows users to manipulate the measurement data that has been imported from the third party performance measurement systems. The primary purpose is to formulate the performance management system objective fields from all the data fields imported from the external third party databases or performance measurement systems. A sample screen is shown in Fig. 4(a), in which the user is creating a new data dictionary field that forms the measurement of schedule adherence (the percentage of time an agent actually spends signed-on to their phone against the time they were scheduled to be there). As illustrated, the user inputs a name description, associates the data dictionary field to a level in the hierarchy, and specifies the period against which the measurement data is captured. The level must be chosen from the set established when creating the organisation hierarchy. A second screen, shown in Fig. 4(b), is used to assign the data dictionary name to a database field or a combination of database fields and defining how these fields are to be calculated. The calculation is defined by a Value 1/ Operator /Value 2 sequence. In the example Fig. 4(b), the user selects the field [fgn_value5] which relates to the actual time the agent was signed-in (taken from the ACD) and divides this by [fgn_value21] which relates to the amount of time they had been scheduled to be signed-in (taken from the Workforce Management System). The following table sets out the field descriptions in more detail. Field Name Mandatory / Field Field Description Optional Behaviour The following table sets out the command options. Fig. 4(c) shows the input screen used to define the data dictionary rules. These rules define how the result for the field is entered, displayed, and calculated. As illustrated in Fig. 4(c) the minimum and maximum values are set, as is the display mask. In this case ##% means that the result will be displayed as a % and rounded up with no decimal places. The over-ride check box allows the organisation to control whether or not these results can be over-ridden by a user's manager. The following table describes the inputs in more detail. The following are the command options The following are the business rules. Typical A data dictionary is to be created for Average Handling Time, Scenario this will also be later used as a Key Performance Indicator. The level for the AHT would have be the level higher than the highest level specified in Hierarchy Maintenance, i.e.: if the highest level in Hierarchy Maintenance was 'Organisation' at Level 7, then the Data Dictionary for AHT must be specified at Level 8. The following are the best practices. The employee maintenance utility 23 creates an employee (agent). The inputs include name, password, password confirm, organisation hierarchy level, a manager to whom the employee reports, an ID, an objective group of which the employee is a member, a team name, a flag indicating whether KPI data will be attributed to the employee, addresses, system ID, and any additional information. The following business rules are applied to employee creation, objective creation, and objective modification. Employee Creation Objective Creation Objective Modification Description An employee's objective group can be amended after it has been specified. In the event of an employee's objective group being amended more than once in a single day, all intermediate objective groups will be deleted and all results and ratings will be attributed to the final objective group. The appraisal rating group configuration function 24 allows the user to define appraisal rating groups. Each group can have up to ten appraisal ratings, which will be used when to rate individual employee's objectives. The review periods available for the system are also defined within this utility. These review periods dictate the 'period selection tabs' displayed in functions such as Personal Performance Review and Appraisal Manager, as well as dictate the periods (apart from daily and weekly) when ratings can occur as set out in the Objective Wizard. The user will create the appraisal rating groups and these will be used throughout the system. These appraisal ratings form an integral part of the system. Separate Appraisal Rating Groups would be set up where a different function in the organisation might wish to rate individuals in a different fashion. The input screen defines an Appraisal Rating Group and the Appraisal Review periods that apply to it. This screen allows the user to configure appraisal rating groups which are used in conjunction with Objective Wizard, Objective Group Configuration - Objective Group Rating, Appraisal Manager, Personal Performance Review. The user configures Appraisal Rating groups, which appear on all the above screens. There is a maximum of ten appraisal ratings per group and more than one Appraisal Rating group can be created. The users must ensure that they select all the review periods required for all objectives i.e.: they might have only have a requirement to review sickness and absence at the 6-month juncture. However, they must select 6 month and it will apply to all. The review period is by Appraisal Group and not by objective. The performance exception codes configuration function 25 allows the user to configure standard codes which can be used by an individuals manager to over-ride their performance for given reasons like system issues, health etc. This functionality ensures that the system 1 allows discretionary management decisions within the organisation but has a means of tracking and reporting on these. The basic principle behind this is that the agents (and team leaders) take responsibility for their own performance and enter comments against their performance (good or bad) in Personal Performance Review. The manager then has the ability to exclude/ override the result for that day from their overall result and from any averages. They must however enter a code for the exception; this will be reported to management and will highlight the various reasons for excluding bad results. This screen is the configuration screen to set up the standard reason codes and is mainly used during the initial system installation. Ongoing changes or additions may be needed as the conditions change. An objective wizard function 50 defines an objective. An objective is a performance expectation assigned to an individual and is set up using the objective wizard 50. The wizard 50 prompts input of the following values. A next step prompts input of data indicating the source of data for the objective. The following are the inputs. Field Name Field Field Description Behaviour Result based Option The objective will use the team result when upon Peer calculating the rating. Objectives of this type may Team only be assigned to employees at the SAME level as the data dictionary field associated with the objective OR, employees at a level HIGHER than the data dictionary level. The Objective is always, in-effect a peer objective, i.e. the employee will be rated on the result of the team that he is part of. The result and rating that he will see will be stored on the database with his manager. When these objectives are assigned to team members, Pseudo objectives are assigned to the team leader. No calculation of ratings is performed for the team members, but rather they see the result and rating for the team that is assigned with the team leader. If team peer result is selected, the Objective will only be rating using Absolute values; i.e. the Rating Method screen will not be shown and Absolute only will be assumed. The wizard 50 then proceeds to prompt input of rating periods, rating methods, absolute thresholds, and to improvement thresholds. For example, the rating method maybe based on either an absolute result or a percentage improvement on the initial target set. The objective group configuration function 51 allows users to create and administer objective groups for the purposes of easy handling of objectives. The only constraint for groups is that the objectives have the same appraisal definitions. The objective group is defined by: - name, - selected appraisal rating group, description, and objectives within the group. The function 51 also allows a percentage weighting to be applied to each objective within the group. Also, random sample ratings may be applied to each objective. The KPI configuration functions 52, 53, and 54 allow users to define all the key performance indicators associated with the call centre or a subset of the call centre such as customer services. The KPIs are similar to objectives except that they are not assigned to individuals and are not rated. They are merely used to report status. Typical KPIs are Service Level, Abandon Rate, Number of Calls, Total Revenue etc. If the system 2 has been configured to have more than one Skill Group e.g.: Customer Services and Telesales, then there is a group of KPIs for each of these i.e.: Customer Service Level, Telesales Service Level. The KPI data can often be more frequent than employee objective data, which has a minimum measurement period of one day. The system 2 typically produces service level and other information associated with skill groups (also called applications or queues) every half-hour. This means that the system receives half-hourly KPI data from the customer services system 2. The KPI's are not rated but they have a target for reference purposes. For example, a call centre might state that the abandon rate target is 5% or less. This can then be shown on a graph or report alongside the actual data to show how the call centre is performing. The KPI wizard 52 prompts definition of: - KPI name and description, - a static target for each month, - additional targets, and - rules. In a typical scenario, a manager wishes to see the Abandon rate for the call centre on an intra daily basis. A KPI will be set-up to capture this data, and the results will be reviewed via the KPI Group Review utility and these results are presented in tabular or graphical format. For an effective call centre the manager requires that the Abandon rate is no more than 5%. Therefore, he would enter 5% in the target. As the manager would like to view this on an intra-day basis, the intra-day, daily and weekly check boxes would need to be ticked. Regarding targets, in a typical scenario a manager wishes to see the days taken absent due to sickness for the call centre on a yearly basis. A KPI will be set-up to capture this data, and the results will be reviewed via the KPI Group Review utility and these results are presented in tabular or graphical format. If the manager wishes to specify the target for the number of days taken absent due to sickness as 40 in a year, the manager would then need to specify in the yearly column the target of 40. If the manager wanted to view the achievement of the target on a quarterly or half yearly basis, then the values of 10 would be needed to be entered for each quarter and the value of 20 for each half year. This also allows the manager to weight the absences (i.e. allow more absences in the winter months than the summer months). Regarding the rules, in a typical scenario a manger wishes to specify the target for the abandon rate as no more than 5%, therefore, the manger would need to set-up a KPI for abandon rate and specify the target as 5%. The manager would then need to check the "<=" box, thus informing the system 1 that any value below the 5% target would be considered as meeting the target. The manager would then need to specify how the next years targets for the KPI would be calculated. The KPI group review configuration function 53 allows a user to group a number of KPIs together for reporting purposes. The KPI group review function 54 allows viewing of KPI data as set up by the wizard 52. The functions 52, 53, and 54 all operate with the KPI table 14, which is dedicated to KPI data only. The performance appraisal manager configuration function 70 allows set-up of an appraisal rating group, a review/appraisal process, and additional information which are then used by the Appraisal Manager 71 for review and appraisal purposes. The performance appraisal manager is used as an on-line tool for individual performance appraisal and review. It is the view of the overall performance achievements of the individual, by performance review periods, for a particular year. These performance review periods are set up via an Appraisal Rating Group Configuration Utility and are presented as tabs on the Appraisal Manager function 71 in the browser. The year can be changed at any time. The information contained within this function is directly fed into the Appraisal Summary Report. Referring to Fig. 5 one of the screens of the function 71 is shown. This screen outlines the appraisal process and specifies the objective ratings for the individual selected. A manual results entry function 60 allows manual input of results by agents or team leaders. The performance review function 61 allows the user to view performance data relating to their own personal objectives i.e.: those objectives within their assigned objective group. It shows the overall rating for the individual as well we the individual's targets, and results and ratings for each objective. Targets and ratings are only displayed if the review period selected i.e.: daily, weekly tab, is defined as a rating period for the objective. The user can review their performance against objectives on a daily and weekly basis as well as for the review periods as defined in the Appraisal Rating Group Configuration. A user can review historical data against the period selected, i.e.: if they are looking at weekly data, then they can review historically by week and if daily then by day, but only in keeping with the archiving rules for the data. If daily tab is selected and today is 1/2/99, they cannot view their performance for 1/10/98 if daily data is archived after 30 days. This function will normally be used by agents, team leaders and managers (it is improbable that organisations may set objectives such as these for senior managers or directors) to review only their own personal objectives and to see how their individual performance compares to that of their team which is also displayed. This function also allows an individual agent to input a comment against their performance for a particular objective. An individual can only comment against a result for an objective's measurement period (defined by the data dictionary maintenance function 22), i.e.: if an objective is measured weekly and the agent wishes too comment on why a bad result was achieved then he/she may only do so on the weekly tab. The personal development status configuration function 30 allows a user to edit an existing status available in a personal development plan 33. The plan 33 is dedicated to allowing a manager or team leader to plan and record agent development modules against specific objectives. Each user may view his or her own personal development and the history of associated actions. Referring to Fig. 6, the function 33 displays the skill that requires a development plan and the action that has been assigned to the skill with the status of the action. This allows reports to be executed for the relevant department (HR, Accounts, Team Leaders, Training etc.) giving them the status on the relevant skills for relevant actions, thus allowing them to make the necessary arrangements. The screen allows the user to monitor the progress of individuals and the effects of the actions on their objectives. In a typical scenario, a team leader wishes to set an action for an agent who is having problems meeting his Average Handling Time targets. The team leader moves into the relevant agent's screen by selecting his name from the name field in the main browser/ The team leader then selects AHT from the objective drop-down menu. The team leader identifies the skill area requiring development as the 'Closing' skill, and selects this from the drop down combo, he then sees that so far the actions that have been given to the agent to aid his AHT have been a 'self-learning' program and a 'buddy session'. As these seem to have not been successful, the team leader decided to enter the agent onto a 'workshop'. The Training Department then executes a report for the amount of AHT workshops that have been requested. Once they see that the number is sufficient, they request a workshop to be held. The reward functions 40 to 43 enable the organisation to automate a points and gifts reward process. Points can be assigned to ratings of individual objectives and using these an individual can then choose their own gift when they want it. These gifts are configurable by the organisation. The reward configuration utility 40 allows a user to assign points to reward prizes. The reward statement and ordering function 41 allows each individual user to both view the points they have accumulated and to order from the different rewards on offer. It also provides a statement to the user (similar to a bank statement) showing how many points they have, how they received them and any transactions (purchases) which occurred. The principle behind this utility is the concept of reward and recognition. It does so by providing immediate reward for effort. These points/prizes systems have previously taken much administrative effort. The reward functions handle this administration and offer call centres an easy-to- manage mechanism for introducing (and tailoring) their own reward system. The reward system can be on a personal basis (where the individuals are awarded points individually) or this can be done for the team. A call centre may introduce a competition in which the first team to gain 1500 points wins a trip to Paris for the weekend, with the aim of building teamwork and hence strengthening the team. The reward and recognition module will provide a means of monitoring the progress of each group. Typically, agents and team leaders will receive reward points for exceeding individual objectives. The reward system manages and awards the points. The call centre can configure the rewards (cash, tickets, wine etc.) and set the number of points for each reward. Users earn points and can then buy the rewards when they have enough points. As shown in Fig. 7 (a), the function 41 provides the user with a detailed breakdown of amendments to points. The points can be amended in three ways: 1) Points awarded/deducted/amended by the rating given to an objective, either automated or manual. 2) Points deducted/ added for the 'Purchase' or 'Refund' of items. 3) Points added/deducted by the Reward Point Editor. The purpose is to allow the agent to see what benefits their strengths have given them and what costs their weaknesses have brought, hence encouraging them to focus on their weaknesses and maintain their strengths. The screen also provides the agent with information pertaining to any transactions that they have made or are pending and provides them with the cost (in points) of the item they purchased. Any comments pertaining to a transaction in the statement can also be viewed. The ratings are added to the screen on the date that they are rated, and hence a monthly objective will only be displayed on the screen when it has been rated and points have been allocated to it. As the ratings are carried out on a daily basis, the archiving principle will dictate how many days data is viewed in the 'Statement' screen, i.e.: If the archive period is defined as "60" in the Call Centre Configuration, then 60 days data will be viewable in the Reward Manager Statement Screen. The reward manager utility function 42 acts as an administration tool for all items ordered by employees. It allows the reward administrator to change the status of all orders which is then communicated back to individuals via function 41. A sample screen is shown in Fig. 7(b). The reward points editor function 43 allows a user to manually adjust the points (by adding or subtracting) of a specific user. The main purpose of this screen is to allow flexibility in the reward system. Typically this screen is used to allow the team leaders and managers to reward behaviour which is not measured by the system. These team leaders and managers have discretion over how they manage the reward system and the points so that the reward system is not seen as taking the discretion of responsibility away from people. The team leaders and managers may also use this to reward people where there is no set objective against the action, (i.e. a customer phones in stating that they were pleased with the service they received from an agent). It will be appreciated that the invention provides for effective centralised performance measurement and reporting, while also greatly assisting with people management in a flexible manner. The system also provides for automated appraisal and reward administration. The ability of agents to view their own development data is very significant as it enhances team participation. The invention is not limited to the embodiments described but may be varied in construction and detail within the scope of the claims.

Claims: Claims 1. A performance management system comprising:- configuration functions comprising:- a call centre configuration function for configuring call centre parameters in a configuration dataset, and a data dictionary function for formulating under user instruction, calculation rules, value inputs for rules and storage parameters for database fields; a plurality of information management functions each comprising means for capturing raw data from an external customer services system, for processing said data, and for storing the processed data according to the data dictionary configuration; and a database for storing processed data and a user interface comprising means for integrating with the configuration and performance management functions. 2. A performance management system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the configuration functions comprise an objective wizard function for configuring objectives for agent and team performance. 3. A performance management system as claimed in claim 2, wherein the objective wizard function comprises means for prompting input of objective description, appraisal definition, and a rating calculation. 4. A performance management system as claimed in claim 2 or 3, wherein the configuration function comprises an objective group configuration function comprising means for defining under user instructions on objective group of objects having the same appraisal definitions and weightings associated with objectives. 5. A performance management system as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the configuration function comprises a KPI wizard function comprising means for prompting user input of organisation-level ratings and thresholds. 6. A performance management system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the configuration functions comprise a KPI group review configuration function comprising means for grouping KPIs together for reporting purposes, and the performance management functions comprise a KPI group review function comprising means for outputting group review data. 7. A performance management system as claimed in any of claims 2 to 6 wherein the performance management functions comprise a personal performance review function comprising means for allowing controlled agent access to personal performance data generated according to configured agent objectives. 8. A performance management system as claimed in claim 7, wherein the personal performance review function comprises means for allowing an agent to input comments associated with his or her personal performance data. 9. A performance management system as claimed in any of claims 2 to 8, wherein the personal performance review function comprises means for allowing a team leader to plan and record agent development against objectives, and for allowing an agent to access his or her personal development data. 10. A performance management system as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the system further comprises functions for configuring and processing rewards in recognition of agent performance against objectives. 11. A performance management system as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the user interface, the configuration functions, and the performance management functions together have a structure of classes for instantiating objects in a user interface layer, a business logic layer, and a data services layer. 12. A performance management system as claimed in claim 11, wherein the business logic class instantiates business logic objects having code of a configuration or an information function, and means for terminating the object at the end of a user session. 13. A performance management system as claimed in claim 12, wherein the business logic layer executes on a business server. 14. A performance management system as claimed in any of claims 11 to 13, wherein the data services layer comprises a class for instantiating data services objects residing on a database server and means for terminating said objects after a user session. 15. A performance management system as claimed in any of claims 11 to 14, wherein the system comprises a transaction server for executing data services layer functions. 16. A performance management system as claimed in claim 15, wherein the transaction server comprises means for maintaining a pool of data services objects together and for maintaining a pool of database connections. 17. A performance management system as claimed in any of claims 11 to 16, wherein dynamic library links for the objects are registered using proxy stub pairs on both a client and a server.

Inventors: MCGLOIN CATHAL, MCGLOIN RAYMOND, MCGLOIN, CATHAL, MCGLOIN, RAYMOND
Applicants: MCGLOIN CATHAL, MCGLOIN RAYMOND, PERFORMIX RES LTD, MCGLOIN, CATHAL, MCGLOIN, RAYMOND, PERFORMIX RESEARCH LIMITED
Application year: 2000
Main classification: G06F17
IPC codes: G06Q10