Composition and process for providing a gloss controlled, abrasion resistant coating on surface covering products

Abstract: The invention comprises a composition and method for controlling the gloss of surface covering products through curing of the composition to create a wearlayer surface, and preferably on a floor covering product. The surface covering product preferably is prepared by application of an aromatic polyester acrylate composition including a flatting agent and/or hard particles, and at least one free-radical generating compound to a substrate, and then the coating is partially cured by exposure to low peak irradiance UV light in either ambient or inert air, followed by fully curing the coating with high peak irradiance UV light in preferably an inert atmosphere to form a low gloss abrasion resistant wearlayer surface. Alternatively, a high gloss wearlayer surface is obtained by solely exposing the preferred composition to high peak irradiance UV light in ambient atmosphere. Furthermore, a differential gloss flooring product is obtained by using the present inventive method described herein.

Description: The invention is directed to a method of manufacturing a surface covering product such as floor tile and floor covering sheets, having a wearlayer with a differential gloss. Cured coatings such as floor wearlayer surfaces function to provide scratch resistance and durability to flooring. The durability encompasses both wear and tear properties, and wearability includes scratch resistance and gouge resistance. Further, the property of scratch resistance includes the ability to withstand both fine and deep scratches from soils and grit particles resulting from foot traffic. Additionally, the property of gouge resistance includes the ability of the coating and flooring to withstand damage from foot traffic in the form of heel damage or dent damage from objects striking the flooring. For many of the decorative patterns in the flooring industry, the desirable coating is a wearlayer surface that has a glossy appearance. In other cases, low gloss is desirable for natural decorative patterns such as wood, slate or brick. A low gloss or matte coating is more preferable to give a "natural or real" appearance of the decorative layer. Accordingly, the gloss level of the coating must be specific for individual decorative patterns and therefore, it becomes a processing requirement to be able to control the gloss level of the coating for specific decorative patterns. Furthermore, manufacturing differences in producing floor covering products may cause visible differences from batch to batch. Thus, in order to maintain a consistent gloss level throughout subsequent batches of floor covering products, gloss-level control must be addressed in the manufacturing process. A prior art approach to obtaining low gloss coatings typically requires multiple ultraviolet (UV) medium pressure-mercury vapor lamps to cure a gloss-forming coating on the flooring material. The UV lamps typically have a long wavelength and a short wavelength output. To match the UV output of these sources, photoinitiators can be used to absorb UV light above 300nm and below 300nm. Microwave UV source lamps that exhibit characteristic spectral distributions above 300nm, however, are more costly than standard medium pressure-mercury vapor lamps. Additionally, some of these photoinitiators (commonly referred to as phosphine oxides) are costly, and in many instances, have the problem of leaving an undesirable yellow color to cured final product. U.S.-A-4,313,969 discloses a method to prepare low gloss or gloss controlled radiation coating by utilizing a two stage process. The first stage of the method involves UV cure of the resin material utilizing long wavelength UV spectral output where no substantial spectral distribution exists below 300nm. The second stage of the method involves the curing the resin under a source comprised of short wave radiation where substantial spectral intensity is below 300nm. U.S.-A-5,585,415 teaches a method of preparing a low gloss coating by utilizing a three stage process including the steps of: (1) passing the coated substrate under ionizing radiation from an electron beam; (2) passing the coated substrate under UV lamps under an oxygen-containing atmosphere; and (3) passing the substrate under UV lamps in an inert atmosphere. A pigmented resin material is used that contains a phosphine oxide photoinitiator to provide a thorough curing. U.S. Patent No. 4,048,036 teaches a method to prepare low gloss coatings derived from a resin composition containing a flatting agent and air cure promoter, disclosed as benzophenone, and a second photoinitiator. The resin material is exposed to low UV irradiance in a high oxygen atmosphere to provide a wet surface and a partially cured, or "gel," state followed by exposure to high UV irradiance in a low-oxygen atmosphere to fully cure the coating, the irradiation having a wavelength between 180 and 400 nm. The object of the present invention is to provide a process of making a UV curable composition capable of producing a differential gloss on surface covering products from the same composition, and a surface covering product resulting from this process. This object is obtained with the features of claim 1, embodiments of which are subjects of the subclaims 2 to 11. The invention is based on a method of making a surface covering product, and preferably a floor covering product, in which the coating composition is selectively curable to a wearlayer with differential gloss. The gloss is controlled by the use of low peak irradiance UV energy under an atmosphere of ambient air, followed by exposure to high peak irradiance UV light, preferably under an inert atmosphere comprised of nitrogen. The coating composition contains a conventional flatting agent to lower gloss and/or hard particulates to improve abrasion resistance of the final surface wearlayer. The gloss levels for the same composition can be controlled by varying UV peak irradiance. The level of peak irradiance for a given coating composition enables specific process parameters to control gloss level. The peak irradiance of the initial UV exposure can be changed, for example by varying the distance between the source and substrate, or alternately, by changing input power for the UV source. The gloss controlled wearlayer composition is formed from an acrylated aromatic polyester in the presence of multifunctional acrylates and a flatting agent and/or hard particulate materials. Partial polymerization is catalyzed by low peak irradiance UV radiation to gel the coating to form a low gloss wearlayer surface. Further polymerization is catalyzed by high peak irradiance UV radiation. The gloss controlled decorative wearlayer surface exhibits many performance properties sought in a flooring material. Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of a device for a process for manufacturing a floor covering product which is not part of the invention. Fig. 2 is a graph representing the effect of UV intensity on gloss level yielded from the cured composition. The floor covering as shown in Fig. 1 comprises a support layer 10, or substrate, which contains decorative elements including color printing, applied particulates, chemical and mechanical embossing (not shown), and a clear coat (which can also be mechanically embossed) that is coated by an applicator device with a composition as further described. The method of coating application preferably is an air knife coater 12, but can alternately be a wire wound rod, three roll coater or a dead two roll coater, all known in the art. However embodied, the rolls 14 are kept warm enough to maintain the composition viscosity to allow for improved flow characteristics to eliminate coating defects commonly observed for high viscosity coatings. The composition is typically preheated in a reservoir. The coated decorative flooring material is moved along a process line preferably by a conveyor which is comprised of a belt and rollers. The method is based on the observation that substantial gloss reduction can be obtained if the preferred composition is UV irradiated with the same type of mercury lamp source(s) having a UV spectrum of 200 to 400nm, shown as a plurality of mercury lamps 16 if the peak irradiance of the lamp source(s) sufficiently is lowered. The gloss level is measured at 60°, as is known in the art and a high gloss level is a measurement of 70 or above and low gloss is a measurement of 50 or below. In the second step of the method of curing the composition, the partially cured coating 18 is then exposed to high peak intensity from the same type of a conventional medium pressure mercury vapor lamp source having a spectral output over the entire UV range of 200 to 400nm. The second UV source 20 is shown herein as four mercury vapor UV lamps. The high peak intensity, however, is the most important factor in this method, rather than a particular number of lamps. The composition, after proper curing, must exhibit performance properties sought in floor coverings. Floor covering properties include good stain resistance and gloss retention as well as sufficient toughness to resist gouging from foot traffic and abrasion resistance to survive continued wear. Although other flatting or hard particle agents may be used as is known in the art, silica is the preferred "flatting" agent to reduce the gloss level of the cured coating. Further, wear resistant fillers preferably are included in the composition and aluminum oxide in all forms to include calcine, crystalline, precipitated, semi and micro crystalline, and amorphous, is the preferred wear resistant filler added, which provides enhanced scratch resistance of the final product after curing of the wearlayer. Other wear resistant fillers as known in the art, however, are alternately used. The composition includes polyesters, which include those described in the reference patents. When the composition is formulated with an appropriate diluent package and other additives, including the hard particle fillers as described above, it exhibits wear and stain resistance properties similar to, and in some cases superior to, the referenced materials. The composition also includes urethane acrylate materials, which are not to be limited to those described in the examples set forth, but include any materials derived from aliphatic or aromatic diisocyanates, when the urethane acrylate materials give crosslink density and glass transition temperatures in the appropriate range for floor wear surface as described herein. Floor coverings also must particularly display a flexibility once cured onto the flooring material, to allow for roll windup onto a small diameter core, shown as wind up 22. A coating that exhibits low elongation can result in the formation of across-machine direction fractures once the composition film is wound. Furthermore, the coating on the rigid decorative film must have sufficient elongation to withstand stretching associated with embossing the surface of the film. An example of a coating composition, although not to be solely limited to polyurethane and polyester floor covering, is the following composition: I. An acrylic polyester (I) comprising of hydroxy and acryl functionality's derived from: A. A hydroxy terminated aromatic polyester formed from the reaction product of a polycarboxylic acid and excess diol; and B. Acrylic acid Resin material I is mixed with mono, di, or trifunctional acrylates to form the initial resin composition. The final floor covering coating composition is then prepared by addition of: II.C. a flatting agent such as silicon dioxide; D. a hard particulate such as aluminum oxide (any form), spinel, aluminum phosphate, silica, titanium; diamond, boron nitride, and other particulates as known in the art; and/or E. other additives which preferably include: (i) Free radical generators, such as photoinitiators, that cleave upon exposure to UV radiation to form radicals that initiate polymerization of the coating composition, including but not limited to, acylphosphine oxides, acetophenone derivatives, and benzophenone-type materials; (ii) Surfactants that provide good leveling and flow characteristics of the applied wet coating; and (iii) UV absorbents that help prevent discoloration of the coating and/or flooring structure upon exposure to UV radiation in the form of sunlight. As discussed above, the second step of the method is partially curing the composition on the surface covering product through exposure to low intensity UV radiation, shown as UV source 16, in such a fashion as to not to degrade or yellow the PVC or non-vinyl composition rigid film or flooring material support layer and alter the appearance of the decorative layer. Thus, the use of the composition at the step of partially curing the composition polymerizes the ethylenically unsaturated groups within the composition from a liquid to a "gel" and results in a low gloss consistensy. Such low gloss is apparent to the naked eye when light is reflected from a micro roughened surface in a diffuse manner. The micro-roughened surface is accordingly achieved by use of a flatting agent such as silica. And further, in accord with the current invention, gloss level is controlled by UV-A- peak irradiance, dosage, and free radical generator (photoinitiator) type and level in the composition. Thus, the partially cured film and the low gloss wearlayer surface is then further cured by utilizing high intensity UV radiation, shown as UV source 20, whereby a high gloss level can be achieved, as further illustrated in Fig. 2. The low gloss appearance of the cured product is consequently predetermined from this process. EXAMPLES OF COATING COMPOSITIONS An example of an acrylated Polyester 1, as described in U.S. Patent No. 5,663,003, Example 2, for the coating acceptable for the invention is a hydroxy terminated polyester (polyester polyol) which was from the following charge in a 2 Liter flask: Trimellitic anhydride 889 g 1,6-Hexanediol 234.5 g Phthalic Anhydride 376.5 g Phosphorous Acid 0.55g The flask was equipped with a mantle, stirrer, thermometer, temperature controller, gas inlet tube, and an upright condenser. The condenser was steam heated and packed with glass helices and had a thermometer on top. The still led to a water cooled condenser that drained into a graduated cylinder. The batch was heated to 220°C under a trickle of nitrogen [14,2 nl/h (0.5 SCFH)] and water of esterification was collected and measured in a graduated cylinder. The reaction mixture was held at 220° C until the acid number had fallen to below 5. This took about 8 hours during which time the water from the esterifications reaction was collected. The final product had an Acid No. of 3.3 and a Hydroxyl No. of 207. It therefore had a hydroxy equivalent weight of 271 an estimated number average molecular weight of 880. The prepared polyester was acrylated as follows: the materials below were introduced into a 2000 ml flask equipped with a mantle, stirrer, thermometer, gas inlet tube, dropping funnel, and Barrett Trap with a water cooled condenser on top; Heptane 200 ml Polyester 800 g Acrylic Acid 277 g Monomethyl ether of hydroquinone 0.12 g P-Toluenesulfonic acid 5.4 g Phosphorus Acid 0.62 g Hydroquinone 0.12 g N-methyldiethanolamine 3.4g The trap was filled to the overflow with heptane. With a dry air flow of 5,8nl/h (0.2 SCFH) the ingredients were heated to reflux at 98°C to 105°C while stirring vigorously and collecting water and displacing heptane in the trap. Heptane was added through the dropping funnel as required to maintain reflux at 100-105°C. After 4 hours of reflux, approximately 65 mL of aqueous distillate had collected. All "water" and heptane were withdrawn from the trap and the dry air flow was increased to 14,2nl/h (2 SCFH). Prior to stripping off the heptane, 3.4 g ofN-Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) was added. When distillation stopped, additional "heptane" had collected in the trap. The batch was cooled to 50°C with a trickle of dry air. The Acid Number of the product was 34. Thus the following compositions were made: COATING COMPOSITION 1 A polyester surface covering composition was prepared from: Acrylated polyester 750g Highly ethoxylated triacrylate SR9035 250g Benzophenone photoinitiator 10g Irgacure 184 photoinitiator 2.5g Surfactant Dow Corning 193 2.5g COATING COMPOSITION 2 To coating Composition 1 was added 4% by weight of surface treated silica from Degussa as OK412. The mixture was blended using a Cowles type blade. COATING COMPOSITION 3 To coating Composition 2 was added 5% weight calcined aluminum oxide obtained from Norton company having an average particle size of 30µms. The mixture was blended using a Cowles type blade. A multifunctional polyurethane (methyl acrylate oligomer) coating composition was prepared from Example 1 in U.S patent No. 5843,576. A further example of a hydroxy terminated polyester, Polyester 2, was prepared in an identical fashion to that described for Polyester 1 with the following charge weights: 1,6 Hexanediol 992.7 g Glycerine 133.5 g Phthalic Anhydride 1071 g Dibutyltin Dilaurate 0.5 g The reaction mixture was cooled and total amount of water collected was 135 g. The final product gave an Acid No. of 2.4 and a Hydroxyl No of 179. It thus had a hydroxyl equivalent weight of 316. COATING COMPOSITION 4 A polyurethane wearlayer forming composition was prepared from the following charge in a 2 Liter flask equipped with heating mantel, stirrer, and dry air purge at 7,1nl/h (0.25 SCFH) : Tone M-100, Hydroxyacrylate from Union carbide Monomer mixture (27.5% by wt Sartomer SR499, 126 g 27.5% by wt Sartomer SR502, 45% by wt Sartomer SR351) 139 g Polyester 2 34 g This mixture was heated to 38°C (100°F). The following was added: Desmodur N-3300, Bayer's isocyanurate trimer 87 g This mixture was heated to 85°C (185°F) and maintained at this temperature for five hours. The mixture was cooled and to the flasks was added: Benzophenone 11.7 Surfactant Dow Corning 193 1 g An infrared spectrum confirmed that all of the NCO groups had reacted. To this mixture was added 48 g of calcined aluminum oxide (30 microns) and 34 g of the silica flatting agent Degussa OK412. This mixture was blended using a Cowles type blade. The final mixture was deaerated. From the following examples 1 to 10 example 9 refers to the invention, while examples 1 to 8 and 10 contribute to the understanding of the invention. EXAMPLE 1 Example 1 illustrates that high, medium and low gloss surface wearlayer can be obtained from the same coating by changing the UVA Peak Irradiance. Coating Composition 2 was preheated to 54°C (130°F) to reduce the viscosity and applied onto a decorative flooring structure which is comprised of a support layer containing decorative elements including color printing, applied particulates, and a clear coat that is embossed, via a roll coater. Excess coating was removed by a heated air knife (shown as coater 12) to give a coating thickness of approximately 0,015 mm (0.6 mils). The coated decorative flooring material, preheated to approximately 38°C (100°F) is directed through an apparatus which includes along a process line by a conveyor which is comprised of at least, to UV sources, a belt and rollers. The coated flooring material is partially cured by exposing it to low UV Peak irradiance from a UV source having a spectral distribution across the entire UV spectrum of 200 to 400nm as commonly observed for mercury vapor lamps shown as UV source 16. The distance of the lamp to substrate was approximately 12,7cm (5 inches). The partial curing process is carried out under an atmosphere of air which results in a low gloss, slightly tacking surface. The partially cured coating is then further cured by being exposed to high peak irradiance from preferably the same type of conventional medium pressure mercury vapor lamp having a spectral output over the entire UV range of 200 to 400nm shown as UV source 20. This process is carried out under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen substantially free of oxygen. The preferred manner of achieving controlled gloss is by varying UVA Peak irradiance of the first UV source to achieve the desired gloss level. At 4,5 m/min (15fpm) the peak UVA irradiance was varied from about 612mW/cm 2 to 934mW/cm 2 for the UV source 20 as illustrated in Fig. 1. Curing Composition 1 under these various UVA peak irradiance in the first step resulted in various gloss levels (60 degree gloss measurements) ranging from 14 to 50 for the cured wearlayer surface as illustrated in Table 1. UVA Peak Intensity vs. Gloss Peak Intensity (mW/cm 2 ) 60 deg Gloss Measurement in flat areas 612 14 742 31 893 46 934 50 EXAMPLE 2 Example 2 illustrates that high gloss can be obtained from the same coating composition. Coating composition 2 was processed in a similar fashion to that described in Example 1 except that four high intensity 79 W/cm (200W/in) UV light sources were used to cure the coating composition in the UV source 16 under an inert, nitrogen atmosphere substantially free of oxygen, in contrast to the oxygen containing atmosphere of Example 1. The total energy was approximately 2J/cm 2 . The final coated wearlayer surface was found to have a high gloss of 74 (60 degree gloss measurement). EXAMPLE 3 Example 3 illustrates that high, medium and low gloss surface wearlayer can be obtained from the same coating composition at an elevated coating temperature (lower viscosity) prior to partial cure by changing the UVA Peak Irradiance. Further, this example teaches that gloss control can be achieved on either side of the intensity/gloss minimum Composition 2 was processed as in Example 1. The final thickness of the coating from composition 2 was approximately 0,025mm (1mil). At 4,5m/min (15fpm), the UVA irradiance was varied from 424mW/cm 2 to 1294mW/cm 2 for the UV source 20 as illustrated in Fig. 2. Curing Composition 2 under these various UVA peak irradiance in the first step at a precure coating temperature of 58°C (137°F) resulted in various gloss levels (60 degree gloss measurements) ranging from 35 to 72. Hence, gloss of the present invention can be adjusted on both sides of the intensity/gloss level minimum, shown graphically in Fig. 2. Minimum gloss is achieved at 540 W/cm 2 . At 424mW/cm 2 the gloss level of 49 is higher than the minimum. Increasing the intensity above 540mW/cm 2 results in an increase in gloss, reaching a value of 73 at 934mW/cm 2. EXAMPLES 3 to 5 Examples 3 to 5 illustrate that abrasion resistant variable gloss wearlayer surfaces can be prepared by incorporation of aluminum oxide particles into the resin material. Example 3 was Composition 1 processed in an identical fashion to Example 2. The final thickness of the wearlayer surface from composition 1 was approximately 0,025mm (1 mil). Example 4 was Composition 3 processed in an identical fashion to Example 2 to give a high gloss wearlayer surface having a thickness of approximately 0,025mm (1 mil.). Example 5 was Composition 3 processed in an identical fashion to that described in Example 1 where the UV source 16 had an adjusted peak irradiance of 540mW/cm 2 under an atmosphere of air. Under these conditions, a low gloss wearlayer surface was produced having a gloss level of about 32 (60 degree gloss measurement in embossed areas of the decorative flooring material). All samples were then evaluated by a modified Gardner abrasion tester using 180 grit sandpaper. After 100 cycles (back and forth is one cycle), gloss retention was calculated by dividing the final gloss measurement by the initial gloss measurement before testing and multiplying by 100. As set forth in Table 2, in comparing Example 3 to Example 4, the incorporation of aluminum oxide significantly improves abrasions resistance as noted in Example 4. The low gloss wearlayer surface prepared from Composition 3 in Example 5 by the current invention also displays improved abrasion resistance versus Composition 1 in Example 3. Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Coating Composition 1 3 3 Aluminum Oxide (approximately 30µm in dia.) None Yes Yes Peak Intensity Lamp 1(mW/cm 2 ) N/A N/A 540 Initial 60 deg Gloss (embossed) 74 63 32 Abrasion gloss retained (%) 48 89 88 EXAMPLES 6 to 8 Examples 6 to 8 illustrate the advantages of various types of flatting agents. As set forth in Table 3, all flatting agents evaluated, e.g. silica, urea formaldehyde, were found to affect the gloss level in a similar fashion. To Composition 1 was added 4% by weight of the flatting agent and the mixture blended using a Cowles type blade. A No. 3 wire-wound rod was used to achieve a 0,025mm (1 mil) coating on flat flooring material. The samples were processed in an identical fashion to that described in Example 1, except that two 79W/cm (200W/in) low peak irradiance lamps (ca.350mW/cm 2 ) were used for UV source 16 under air atmosphere. The final cure was accomplished by use of two high peak irradiance 79w/cm (200W/in) UV lamps for UV source 20 under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The total cure energy for these samples was approximately 1.7J/cm 2 . Effect of Flatting Agent on Gloss Example 6 Example 7 Example 8 Coating Composition 1 1 1 Degussa OK412 silica 4%wt None None Crossfield UV70C silica None 4%wt None Pergopak; urea formaldehyde None None 4%wt Peak intensity Lamps 1 & 2 (mW/cm 2 ) About 350 About 350 About 350 Initial 60 deg Gloss (embossed) 26 26 10 EXAMPLE 9 (invention) Example 9 illustrates that a differential gloss product can be made by using the inventive process. Composition 2 was applied onto an embossed flooring material via a #10 wirewound rod. The coated substrate was pre-heated to 54°C (130°F) and partially cured by exposing it to low UV peak irradiance from the UV source 16 in air. The distance of the lamp housing to the substrate was approximately 17,8cm (7 inches). The UV peak irradiance was 540mW/cm 2 . Composition 2 was coated to the partially cured coating discontinuously onto the tops of the embossed surface in the same Composition 2. The partially cured coating Composition 2 and non-cured Composition 2 was cured by exposing the sample to high peak irradiance. Curing under these conditions gave a differential gloss product having a low gloss level, about 30, in the grout areas of the embossing structure and high gloss, about 80, on the tops of the embossed areas. The present inventive method therefore provides a surface covering product which can have gloss control with a single composition applied. Moreover, the same composition can be differently cured on the same surface covering product such that the same surface covering product, e.g. a floor tile, can have areas of differential gloss from altering the method of curing, as opposed to modifying or changing the composition. Accordingly, once the composition is coated onto the substrate comprising surface covering product, the gloss level of the final cured product can be gloss-controlled for the full or partial coated areas of the surface covering product. EXAMPLE 10 Example 10 illustrates that a high, medium and low gloss surface wearlayer can be obtained from the polyurethane acrylate based oligomer Composition 4 by changing the UVA Peak Irradiance. Coating Composition 4, a polyurethane coating, was pre-heated to 38°C (100°F) to reduce the viscosity and applied onto a decorative tile structure, which is comprised of a rigid vinyl film and tile base, preferably with a 0,05mm (2mil) birdblade. The coated decorative tile structure was preheated in an oven to approximately 66°C (150°F) and is directed through an apparatus which includes along a process line by a conveyor which is comprised of a UV sources, a belt and rollers. The coated tile structure is partially cured by exposing it to low UV Peak irradiance from a UV source having a spectral distribution across the entire UV spectrum of 200 to 400nm as commonly observed for mercury vapor lamps. The distance of the lamp to substrate was approximately 25cm (10 inched).The partial curing process is preferably carried out under an atmosphere of air which results in a low gloss, slightly tacking surface. The partially cured coating Composition 4 was cured by exposing the sample to high peak irradiance At 3m/min (10fpm) the peak UVA irradiance was varied from about 87mW/cm 2 to 191mW/cm 2 for the UV source 20 as illustrated in Fig 1. Curing Composition 4 under these various UVA peak irradiance in the first step resulted in various gloss levels (60 degree gloss measurements) ranging from 21 to 74 for the cured wearlayer surface as illustrated in Table 4. UVA Peak Intensity vs. Gloss Peak Intensity (mW/cm 2 ) 60 deg Gloss Measurement 87 21 133 60 191 74

Claims: A method of manufacturing a surface covering product having a wearlayer with a differential gloss, the method comprising the steps of: a) providing an ultraviolet radiation curable coating composition comprised of: a resin including an acrylated aromatic polyester and an ethoxylated polyfunctional acrylate, a flatting agent and/or a hard particulate material, and at least one free-radical generating photoinitiator, cleaving upon exposure to ultraviolet radiation, b) applying the coating composition onto a substrate, c) partially curing the coating composition by irradiating the coated substrate with a low peak ultraviolet radiation having a spectral distribution from 200 nm to 400 nm in an oxygen containing atmosphere polymerizing the ethylenically unsaturated groups within the coating composition from liquid to a gel resulting in a low gloss consistency, d) further applying the coating composition to the partially cured coating composition discontinuously onto the surface and e) further curing the partially cured coating composition and the non-cured coating composition by irradiating the partially cured coating composition and the non-cured coating composition with a high peak ultraviolet radiation having a spectral distribution from 200 nm to 400 nm in an atmosphere substantially free of oxygen whereby a high gloss level is achieved. The method of claim 1, wherein the radiation curable coating further includes an acrylated urethane. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the step of coating the substrate with a radiation curable coating is coating the substrate with the radiation curable coating to a thickness of between about 0,006 mm (.25 mils) and about 0,1 mm (4 mils). The method of claims 1 to 3, wherein the substrate is a flooring material. The method of claims 1 to 4, wherein the flatting agent and/or hard particulate materials of the coating composition is a silica flatting agent present at up to 10 % by weight. The method of claims 1 to 4, wherein the flatting agent and optionally the hard particulate materials of the coating composition are aluminum oxide particles between 1 µm to 50 µm in approximate diameter, and the aluminum oxide particles present at up to 15 % by weight. The method of claim 6, wherein the aluminum oxide particles are about 10 µm to about 40 µm in diameter, and present at up to about 15 % by weight. The method of one of the preceding claims, wherein the photoinitiator of the coating composition is a benzophenone type initiator, an acylphosphine oxide or an acetophenone derivate. The method of one of the preceding claims, wherein the radiation curable coating composition includes a surfactant. The method of one of the preceding claims, wherein the radiation curable coating composition includes an ultraviolet absorbent. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the atmosphere substantially free of oxygen is an inert atmosphere of nitrogen.

Inventors: HERR RICHARD E JR, LEININGER LARRY W, MALKOWSKI ELIZABETH A, ROSS JEFFREY S, SIGEL GARY A, HERR, RICHARD E., JR., LEININGER, LARRY W., MALKOWSKI, ELIZABETH A., ROSS, JEFFREY S., SIGEL. GARY A.
Applicants: ARMSTRONG WORLD IND INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Application year: 2000
Main classification: C09D167
IPC codes: C08F2, C08F283