FABRICATION OF MULTIPLEXING AND DEMULTIPLEXING SINGLE-MODE FIBER OPTIC COUPLERS

Abstract: Multiplexing and demultiplexing single-mode fiber optic couplers are fabricated by aligning two single-mode fibers which have been stripped of their protective plastic jackets and cleaned so that they are held in parallel contact with each other, and then fusing these fibers to achieve a desired fusion profile and elongating the fused fibers to achieve a match point between the wavelength period and the polarization phase. The elongation process is interrupted and resumed as required to obtain a precise match point required to produce the desired multiplexing or demultiplexing coupler.

Description: FABRICATION OF MULTIPLEXING AND DEMULTIPLEXING SINGLE-MODE FD3ER OPTIC COUPLERS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1 Field of the Invention The invention relates to optical fiber couplers made by fusing and tapering the optical fibers and fabncation of such couplers so as to provide multiplexing and demultiplexing optical functions with minimal polanzation effect This invention also relates to the design of such couplers having predetermined wavelength peπods 2 Descπption of the Pπor Art Fused tapered couplers are made by laterally fusing and tapering two or more optical fibers The technique enables an exchange of light power between two or more optical fibers and can be used to fabπcate power splitters One advantage of this method is that light never leaves the glass of the optical fiber and never encounters an interface, making the coupling process inherently reflection free Initially, this technique was discovered at the Canadian government communications research centre in Ottawa with reference to multimode optical fiber distribution systems, which lead to several patents, such as U S Patents Nos 4,291,940, 4,330,170, 4,439,221, 4,449,781, 4,586,784 and 4,763,977 It was soon realized that it also worked with monomode or smgle-mode fibers as disclosed, for example, in U S Patent No 5,054,874, but with a somewhat different behaviour With single-mode fibers, the coupling of light between the fibers was oscillatory, as a function of elongation, and thus the coupling ratio could be controlled Furthermore, it was also observed that this behaviour was oscillatory in wavelength and thus the couplers could be used as wavelength multiplexers and emu tip exers as sc ose , or examp e, y ures et a , pp ie ptιcs, , 22( 12) In the telecommunications domain, the realization of multiplexers was published, for instance, by Lawson et al., 1984, Electronics Letters, 20(23) It was then determined that the penod could be controlled by the number of coupling cycles which are observed dunng the elongation process. In the early 1980 " s, the onl> commercially available multiplexing fused couplers were of large penods (1300 nm -1550 nm) corresponding to 1.5 or 2 elongation cycles However, it was later shown by Bilodeau et al., Optics Letters, 1987, 12(8), that couplers with large number of cycles had much smaller penods than those with a small number of cycles The expenmental wavelength response of long couplers shows a beating phenomenon, where the sinusoidal spectral response is modulated. This is explained by the modulation attributed to the slight difference in modal propagation constants, as disclosed, for example, by Love et al., Electronics Letters, 1985, 21(12) It became obvious then that to make a good multiplexer with a small wavelength spacing, one had to make a long coupler with many cycles and that for the multiplexed wavelengths, the two polarization states should be in phase, as shown, for instance, by McLandnch et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, 1991, 9(4) There are also patents that describe this pnnciple For example, U S Patent No. 5,491,764 discloses a narrow band twisted optical fiber wavelength division multiplexer/demultiplexer (WDM) where a pair of fibers is first twisted to reduce polarization dependence and then fused to form a coupler. It is stated in this patent that although there exist fiber optic WDMs that use optical fibers which are aligned in parallel with one another and fused to form a fiber optic coupler, they are only capable of MUXing and DEMUXing two preselected wavelength lights, operating at wavelengths of 1310 nm and 1550 nm In U.S Patent No 5,809,190 there is disclosed a multi-window wavelength- division multiplexer (MWDM) in which two fibers are crossed and fused together to form a multiplexer coupler It is stated in this patent that it uses a crossed pair of fibers, instead of a pnor art twisted pair of fibers, to improve the polanzation dependent loss By reducing the polanzation sensitivity, U S Patent No 5,809.190 indicates that more than two wavelengths can be multiplexed, which is obvious for sinusoidal wavelength response because such response is penodic This principle wa^ disclosed by Sy on et al in a paper entitled "Dense all fiber WDM bv means of Mach-Zehnder interferometer" presented at SPLE Photonics West '96 conference on Functional Photonic and Fiber Devices, held San Jose, California on Jan 28 - Feb 2, 1996 and published in the SPIE Proceedings Vol 2695 pp 114-122 Neither of the above patents descnbes ways to achieve the coπect spacing and to match the polarization phase simultaneously, for any given channel spacing Therefore, there is a need for multiplexing and demultiplexing couplers with naπo channel spacing, wherein one would simultaneously obtain a predetermined wavelength spacing and the required polanzation phase match SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a method of fabncation of multiplexing and demultiplexing couplers with narrow channel spacing of 0 4 nm or larger b\ controlling the degree of fusion and the shape of the longitudinal profile of the fused fibers This can be done without either twisting or crossing the single-mode fibers from which the couplers are made by fusion and elongation This allows a more precise control of the response of the coupler and makes it possible to achieve a , reproducible in fabrication. This is possible because the control can be used to reduce or increase polarization dependence and wavelength dependence so that the match can be made for any desired condition. The invention also includes the novel couplers produced pursuant to the new fabrication process. The principle of operation of single-mode fused fiber couplers is now well known. For simplicity, we will only describe the operation of a 2 x 2 coupler, i.e., a coupler composed of 2 fused single-mode identical fibers. Although the basic principle presented here is applicable to other fused structures, using more than 2 fibers or dissimilar fibers, most of the discussion herein is oriented towards making a 4 port-device, i.e., 2 input ports and 2 output ports, that can multiplex or demultiplex two series of wavelengths. In making a 2 x 2 single-mode fused fiber coupler, two optical fibers are placed side-by-side after stripping of the protective polymer jacket, so that the optical claddings of the fibers are longitudinally in contact over a predetermined length. Such contact can be mechanically maintained or, as indicated in some prior art references mentioned above, the fibers can be crossed or twisted together. The exposed section is placed between two holding clamps that suspend it so that a heat source can be approached to fuse and soften the glass, and to create a taper by pulling on the clamps. This creates a bi-taper structure, made of two fibers that share a single optical cladding because they are fused together. If the taper transverse dimensions are small enough, the fiber cores are reduced to a point where they do not guide the light anymore. This power is then guided by the optical cladding and the sunounding medium, which is usually air, thus forming a highly multimode waveguide. ecause r , p e wo use identical fibers, the single-mode fiber core mode excites, in the down-taper region, a superposition of two optical modes of the fused and tapered region. These modes, hereafter called supermodes, are the fundamental mode, labelled LP 0] and the first asymmetric mode, labelled LP π . If the transition in the down taper region is adiabatic. i.e. the taper slope is not too abrupt, the two supermodes are exited equally and no power is lost to higher power modes. The two supermodes then propagate along the fused section, accumulating a phase difference φ. In such adiabatic up-taper region, the supermodes interfere and the power goes back into the fiber cores Depending on the phase however, the interference will be either constructive in the initial fiber core or if the modes are out of phase, in the secondary fiber core, thus transferring the power from one fiber to the other. The transmission of a coupler of length L can be described by a transfer matrix T(φ), where α, and ^ are the optical amplitudes in the first and second fiber respectively at the input of the coupler (α^O)) and at the output of the coupler ( ,(L)j. where the accumulated phases are defined as and because the longitudinal profile of a tapered coupler vanes along L, 1 e , the transverse dimensions are tapered down then up, and the propagation constant of the supermodes B, and B 2 for the supermode LP 01 and the supermode LP U respectively depends on the local transverse dimension This transmission of a coupler, for an input m one of the branches ( ,(0)=l θ 2 (0)=0) is thus given by P - cos 2 (φ) P 2 = sm : ( p) where P, and P 2 is the output optical power in the first fiber and second fiber respectively The oscillatory behaviour of a 2 x 2 coupler thus depends only on the accumulated phase difference φ When one elongates a coupler, one obverses an oscillatory behaviour. This is due to the phase difference φ being increased as the length L of the coupler increases When a coupler is measured in wavelength, one can also notice this oscillatory behaviour, because the phase difference φ also increases approximately linearly with wavelength Furthermore, when couplers are elongated several cycles, a beating phenomenon is observed m the cycles if an unpolanzed light source is used This effect is due to the birefringence of the coupler One can define two orthogonal axes of polanzation, which are the two axes of symmetry of the coupler, defined here as x-axis and y-axis For each axis, there are 2 supermodes, LP 01 X , LP n \ and LP 01 0 LP n y If each polarization is independent of the other, I e , if they are not coupled in the coupler, the transmission can be wntten for each po a za n Pf = cos 2 (φ x ) 70 = cos 2 (<p y ) E0 = sin 2 (<p v ) where φ x and φ y are the accumulated phase differences of the two polarization states The total output power for all states of polarization can thus be written as follows P 2 = (a 2 i (0)f P 2 '(φ x ) + (aζ(0) P 2 "(φ y ) where ^"(0) and 0 (0) are the amplitudes of each polarization state at the input of the coupler. For a normalized power input, fσ, x (0)) + /α, y (0)) 2 =l . The resulting output is thus a modulated sinusoidal response, the modulation amplitude being determined by the ratio of the initial polarization amplitude. When monitored with an unpolarized light source, the modulation amplitude is maximum because both states of polarization are excited with equal amplitude. The transmission thus becomes represented as follows: s a unc ion o e onga io or wave n , e measure response o a coup er with an unpolarized source will show a rapid power oscillation between the two output ports, the amplitude of which is modulated, i.e., for which the contrast varies from 0 to 1 In this modulated oscillation, when the amplitude is maximum, I e , when there is a complete power exchange between the two ports, the polanzation phases φ N and φ N are matched, i.e their difference is a multiple of 2π When the contrast is 0. l e , when the rapid oscillation amplitude almost disappears, the power is divided 50%/50% between the ports, and the polanzation phases are out of phase by π Therefore, to make a good multiplexer/demultiplexer, one has to match both polarization phases, so that the amplitude of the power exchange is maximum whatever the state of polanzation According to this invention, in order to match the two polanzation states at a given wavelength spacmg, the parameters that change the fused fiber transverse and longitudinal shape must be controlled. These parameters relate to the local cross- sections of the fused fibers and mclude the degree of fusion between the fibers and the reduction ratio defined as the reduced cross section dimension/initial dimension before tapenng. Their value vanes with the tapered structure, i.e with the longitudinal profile, including both the vanation of degree of fusion and of reduction ratio Accordingly, one of the objects of this invention is to control the phase of the two polanzation states. However, such control would be difficult if there was a coupling between the polanzation states Thus, it is a preferred feature of this invention to keep the fibers of the coupler m parallel alignment, i.e. untwisted and uncrossed, dunng fusing. In such a fused fiber coupler, the two polarization states do not coup e an t ere ore prov e no uncertainty m e process a sing ue to coup ing that may occur with twisted or crossed fibers. Furthermore, it is difficult to measure parameters such as the degree of fusion, when the fibers are twisted or crossed, making the control of such parameters more difficult Nonetheless, the invention ma\ also be applied to couplers with twisted or crossed fibers, although with greater difficulty of control It is also an object of this invention to teach how to change the degree of fusion and longitudinal profile in order to obtain the matching of the polanzation phases at a given wavelength separation It is a further object of this invention to provide a matching which does not result in a unique profile, but rather several profiles may produce such a matching because the process is periodic in nature The choice of the matching point will depend on the restriction in length that might be imposed on the coupler design due to a packaging size limitation, or the desire to minimize the polarization effect for more than two wavelengths. In order to understand how to achieve the polarization phase matching, one has to understand how the wavelength response of a coupler is influenced by its degree of fusion and reduction ratios The degree of fusion is a measure of the shape of the cross-section of the fused coupler. By definition, it varies from 0, when the fibers are barely touching each other to 1 when the two fibers are completely fused, making the cladding of the fused structure cylindrical in form. There is a direct relation between the degree of fusion and the distance between the fiber cores, which are closest when the degree of fusion is l. The reduction ratio is the measure of the taper profile. It is the scaling factor of the cross-section as the taper is made. It is assumed that when the fibers are tapered, the reduction in size is always proportional for both x and y axes. Both parameters will influence the local difference of the supermodes propagation constants Δ β= Bj - B 2 . At a given wavelength, for a given degree of fusion, Δ β will increase as the taper size is reduced. For a given reduction ratio, Δ β will also increase if the degree of fusion is increased. The effect of these parameters on the wavelength dependence is more complex. First, for a given degree of fusion and reduction ratio, Δ β increases with wavelength. Thus, the accumulated phase φ of a coupler of length L also increases with wavelength, thus giving the coupler its oscillatory wavelength response However, the wavelength period will depend on the slope dφ/dλ of the phase. Thus, for a given degree of fusion and reduction ratio, an increase in the length L will reduce the wavelength period. That is why longer couplers have nanower wavelength response. Furthermore, for a given length L and a given degree of fusion, a coupler with a smaller cross-section (a smaller reduction ratio) will also have a smaller wavelength period. However, for a given length and a given reduction ratio, a greater degree of fusion will increase the wavelength period. Thus, all these parameters influence the wavelength period of a coupler. The actual coupler is even more complex because the phase is an integral over the longitudinal profile of length L of all the different Δ β given by the local fusions and reduction ratios. Because of this, however, it is possible to modify the profile of a coupler to change its properties. or examp e, w en a coup er is ma e, one can monitor e e ongation oscillatory response When momtonng at wavelength ,, the response is penodicalK maximum If one stops at the Nth maximum, and looks at the wavelength spectrum one will see a given wavelength penod, thus creating a multiplexer between λ , and λ 2 , with a channel spacing of δ λ 2 - λ - λ 2 If one continues the elongation to the next maximum at λ one will increase the phase, and thus decrease the wavelength penod, thereby creating a multiplexer between λ , and λ 3 with a channel spacing of δ λ 3 = λ , - λ, < δ λ 2 This allows to make a multiplexer with different spacings However this spacing, at a given wavelength, is discrete Varying the degree of fusion or the longitudinal profile will help change these discrete points so as to match the spacing with the maximum at a given wavelength For example, if one wants δ λ : > δ λ 2 > δ λ 3 , one can either increase the size of the cross-section by using a wider heat source or by increasing the fusion This will shift δ λ 2 towards δ λ 2 Or if one decreases the size of the cross-section or decreases the fusion, one will shift δ λ 3 towards δ λ 2 These two parameters can be controlled m a continuous fashion, thus making it possible to match any wavelength penod at any wavelength According to this invention, it is possible to use the same pnnciple as explained above to match the wavelength penods and the polanzation phase at the same time, since the same reasoning can be applied to the polanzation phase matching Thus, it is first necessary to look at the influence of the fusion and ratio parameters on the polanzation phases Except in the case of extremely lightly fused couplers, the two polanzation phases are almost equal for couplers with full cross- section dimensions and their difference increases as these dimensions get smaller owever, t is epen ence is no propo iona o t e egree o usion, eing argest or a degree of fusion close to 0, minimum at a value between 04 and 0 7, and shghtl larger for a degree of fusion of 1 As a function of the reduction ratio, the smaller the coupler, the greater the difference between the two polanzation phases And the increase is exponential with the size This is due to the supermode fields which are larger at the cladding-air interface and the large index step has a large influence on the \- and y- polanzation difference As with the supermode phases φ x and φ y , the polanzation phase difference φ ^ also accumulates a phase difference along the coupler Because both are positive and of a small order of magnitude, the phase difference φ^ is smaller than either φ N or φ y That essentially means that, as a function of elongation when monitored with an unpolanzed light source, the coupler will go through many power exchange cycles before φ^ is equal to π, which corresponds to a null pomt m the contrast or 2π for the first maximum contrast point, i.e. the polanzation phase matching point It is close to the pomts where φ^ is a multiple of 2 t , that the multiplexing coupler should operate, the polanzation beating phenomenon being also a function of wavelength Thus, when a coupler is elongated, power cycles can be monitored and elongation can be stopped when the first polanzation phase φ^ match point is reached Then, if measured as a function of wavelength, one will observe a maximum contrast at the momtonng wavelength, contrast which will decrease as one looks further away from the momtonng wavelength If one looks at the difference between the first maximum and the first minimum on either side of the momtonng wavelength, one will get the channel spacmg of this particular multiplexing coupler t e e ongation is continue to e nex po aπza ion p ase ma c point, t e wavelength penod will be smaller One can continue elongation to the next phase matching point to obtain again a smaller penod, and so on As with the multiplexer phase itself, these points are discrete points that have specific wavelength periods If these penods do not conespond to the desired penod, one can adjust the phase wavelength slope dφ/dλ so that the phase matching point also matches the desired period One can adjust the fusion or the longitudinal profile to achieve this match If the phase matching point penod of the closest phase matching point is smaller than the desired penod, it means that the coupler is not polarization dependent enough This can be conected by creating a profile with a smaller waist which will increase the polanzation dependence The phase match point will occur sooner in elongation and thus will be smaller, while the conesponding peπod will be larger With a good control of the coupler parameter, it can be made to match the desired penod. When the penod is so matched, a small adjustment m the length may be needed so as to match the maximum and minimum with the appropriate wavelength When the number of cycles is large, the first polanzation phase match point occurs only after many cycles, and the penod does not sigmficantlv change with a shift of a fraction of the penod; thus the adjustment can be made without changing the penod This is not true, however, for a coupler with only a few cycles, where the profile has to be changed in order to make the penod and the wavelength match Inversely, if the phase matching point penod of the closest phase matching point is larger than the desired penod, then one has to make the profile waist larger to reduce the polanzation dependence. This will make the coupler length longer, but it will be possible to phase match both the polarization and the penod is impor an o no e a e p ase ma c can e rea ize y c anging t e degree of fusion rather than the profile, or a combination of both The effect of changing the degree of fusion can be significant For a given profile, it is possible to make the first polarization match point penod using a degree of fusion of 0 4 equal to the second polarization match point period of a coupler that has a 0 1 degree of fusion Thus, according to this invention, it is possible to control the polarization phase match point penod of the couplers by controlling both the degree of fusion, I e the cross-section of the coupler, and the shape of the longitudinal profile, bv varving the heat source position and/or shape and the speed of elongation Because of the sensitivity of both the fusion parameter and the longitudinal profile, and because the method to obtain the appropnate wavelengths and periods is iterative, I e , a coupler has to be made, measured and the fabncation parameters have to be modified to make the next attempt closer to the goal, the fabncation process must be repeatable This is why it is necessary to separate the steps of fusing the fibers and elongating the structure, so that the degree of fusion may be made reproducibly and measured It is thus part of the process of this invention to fuse the coupler in a separate step before proceeding with the elongation and tapenng of the fused fibers Furthermore, the fusion step can be realized with a different heat source than the elongation and tapenng step To decrease the time of fusion, another torch tip creating a hotter flame, can be used to fuse the fibers Also, the flame is preferabh approached from the side, so that the gas flow from the torch tends to push the fibers together, facilitating the fusion process The heat source is swept along the fusion reg on, spe g on, o crea e a gra ua variation in the degree of fusion so that no loss is induced in the optical power transmission during and after fusion and during and after tapering. It is a feature of the method of this invention to achieve the polanzation phase matching period by iteratively adjusting the longitudinal profile and the degree of fusion. This is realized by changing the heat source position and/or shape and the speed of elongation. Once the general properties of a multiplexer are thus achieved, one can go to more detailed optimization. The important parameters of the multiplexers and demultiplexers will now be described in greater detail. A multiplexing coupler has 3 ports that are used. There are two input ports where the different wavelengths are inserted and combine in the output port. The important optical parameters describing a multiplexing coupler are the insertion loss of each wavelength going through the devices. Ideally, the insertion loss should be 0 dB (conesponding to a normalized transmission of 1, i.e., a lossless device). For a demultiplexing coupler (which is exactly the same thing as a multiplexing coupler but used in reverse), the combined wavelengths are inserted in the single input port and are separated in each of the two output ports. In this case an additional important parameter is the isolation of the wavelengths, meaning the amount of power at a given wavelength, which is present in the other port with the other wavelength. The isolation should be as large as possible because the different wavelengths and thus the different signals will otherwise interfere at the output detector and thus cause eπors, and any wavelength which is not in the appropriate port is lost for the transmitted signal. In both the multiplexer and demultiplexer, one other important parameter is , . ., the device keeps certain properties, i.e., a given insertion loss or isolation The simplest application of a multiplexing coupler is to multiplex or demultiplex two wavelengths In a polanzation phase cycle, the polanzation phase match point occurs at one wavelength λ p It is only at this wavelength in the polarization cycle that the transmission of the coupler is mdependent of polanzation The phase mismatch increases as one moves away from this wavelength However, even with a mismatch there is a point in each transmission half-cycle, where the output power is polarization independent because, at the transmission extremum of an unpolanzed wavelength response P x = P The coupling ratio of this minimum dependence does however depend on the local value of the phase mismatch, and if this phase mismatch is large, the local contrast will not be good To minimize the polanzation effect, one has to design the profile so that λ, < λ p < λ 2 , λ, and λ 2 bemg the two wavelengths to be multiplexed Ideally λ p =( λ, + λ 2 )/2. Bemg close to the polanzation phase match point will insure a good isolation at both wavelengths However, if one goes further away from this point, 1 e., looking at the second, third, etc extremum, the isolation will decrease and the insertion loss will increase Though the multiplexer or demultiplexer may function, it will not be the optimum situation The condition where the polarization phase match point is exactly in the middle of the two multiplexed wavelengths conesponds to a symmetry in the wavelength signal when, at both multiplexed wavelengths, the isolation and insertion loss are the same If the λj = λ p , the isolation would be greatest at that wavelength and less at λ 2 , because the polarization phase mismatch is larger To achieve this condition, one can carefully tailor the coupler cross-section and longitudinal profile, but it is difficult to always match the polarization phase match point and the mid-point wavelength of the wavelength period. It was found, and it is a feature of this invention, that whereas heating and elongating the coupler increases all phases φ x , φ y and φ^, making a small mechanical elongation without a heat source, herein refened to as "cold-pull", increases the polarization phases φ x and φ y but decreases, φ^. This effect can be used to optimize the phase match in order to obtain a symmetrical isolation response between the two multiplexed wavelengths The precision in the centering of the channel can be obtained by small pulling adjustments which consist simply in stopping the elongation process and removmg the heat source, at a point where the exact period and wavelengths are not yet reached, then monitoring the wavelength response. Thereafter, one reheats and pulls slightly in a very controlled manner, for a controlled time or distance and immediately removes the heat source. This will cause the coupler wavelength response to evolve in a very gradual and controlled manner, making it possible to target very precisely the wavelengths. Because the polarization phase effect of the cold pull can be very well calibrated, it is always possible to slightly overshoot the polarization phase match point and then bring it back with a cold-pull, so as to simultaneously match the multiplexed wavelengths with symmetry extremums in isolation. It is part of the method of this invention to adjust the final coupler properties using the short heated controlled pulls and the final cold pull. With such good control tools within the fabrication process, the design becomes very flexible and several applications can be optimized, such as applications involving several wavelengths, applications involving very narrow spacing (e.g. 1 6 nm channel spacing) and applications involving large wavelength spacing (30 n to 70 nm) As mentioned above, one can use more than one extremum away from the polanzation phase matching point, but in such cases the performance may not be optimum It may however by acceptable, so that the coupler could be used for more than two wavelengths, if such wavelengths stand on an approximately equally spaced gnd The optimization is similar as for the two wavelength multiplexer, except that the polanzation phase match wavelength must be placed at λ p = (λ, -•- λ n 02. λ r being the longest wavelength of the multiplexed senes with λ, being the shortest In this scheme the odd numbered wavelengths are multiplexed to the even numbered wavelengths In the demultiplexer, a senes of wavelengths separated by δ λ will be demultiplexed into two senes of wavelengths separated by 2 δ λ The centenng techmque is identical as for the two wavelength multiplexer However, if one wants to optimize the performance of the device, one must try to reduce the polarization dependence so as to decrease the polanzation phase mismatch within the wavelength range λ , to λ π This can be done by using a strong degree of fusion and a large cross- section profile In this case, the polarization phase match occurs at a small number of polanzation cycles, which makes the polanzation phase difference slope smaller This, however, will make the coupler physically longer Thus, the method for producing such coupler is limited by the maximum length admissible for the packaging of the device It is, therefore, a feature of this invention to achieve a multi-wavelength operation of the multiplexers and demultiplexers by properly centenng the polanzation phase match pomt and reducmg the polarization sensitivity by the control o t e usion an e onga ion pro e o e coup er is mu i-wave eng operation is possible for a very narrow spacing (1.6 nm), but is more limited by polanzation than for larger spacing because the polaπzation phase slope is much larger with the narrow spacing For a large spacing (e g 10 nm) operation, over 8 wavelengths is possible as opposed to 4 for 1 6 nm spacing, with the same isolation cπteπa For very small channel spacing such as 1 6 nm, the number of power cvcles is very large (>400) and the number of polanzation cycles is also large (>30) This means that the peπod at each polaπzation cycle changes just a little It is thus easier to achieve the proper peπod match than for larger penods, because of the discrete step in the penod of the polanzation cycles Because of the adjustment possible with the fusion parameter and the longitudinal profile, it is possible to match the polanzation phase of any penod This applies for any peπod that can be achieved after the first polanzation phase match point m elongation Depending on the profile, the channel separation is usually between 25 and 10 nm at this first polarization phase match point It is thus possible to easily match any channel spacmg, from 30 nm to 1 nm, b \ increasing or decreasing the polanzation dependence using the degree of fusion parameter or the profile parameter However, for spacmg of about 30 nm, this is more difficult because the first polarization phase match point has not been reached during elongation and the zero point can not be moved To make multiplexers with wavelength spacmg of 30 nm and above, one must either greatly increase the polanzation sensitivity or greatly decrease it For spacings above 60 nm, the solution, which is part of this invention, is to decrease the polarization sensitivity by using a strong fusion and a very long longitudinal profile This solution does not place a polanzation match point between e targe wave eng s, u i minimizes e po arization mismatc ne cou exten this solution to spacings below 60 nm, but the coupler usually becomes to long for it to be practical The other solution is to make the coupler very polanzation sensitive by moving the first polanzation phase match point penod up to the desired value between 30 and 60 nm This requires a very small degree of fusion and an abrupt longitudinal profile Because this produces an mcrease in polanzation dependence it will limit the operation of the device m a multi-wavelength configuration Thus, it is a feature of this invention to realize large peπod multiplexers using the long profile approach for larger spacings and using a profile with small fusion and size to realise mid-spacing multiplexers BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS A prefened embodiment of the invention will now be descπbed with reference to the appended drawings in which Fig 1 is a graphic representation of a calculated refractive index profile of a two-fiber coupler of the present invention, Fig 2 is a representation of the cross-section of the structure of the coupler of Fig 1 charactenzed by the degree of fusion of the fibers, Fig 3 is a graphic representation of the beat length of the coupler of Fig 1 for the wavelength of 1550 nm, Fig 4 is a graph illustrating the wavelength dependence of a coupler of beats as a function of normalized transverse dimension of the tapered structure of the coupler, Fig 5 is a graph showing the ratio of polanzation as a function of normalized transverse dimension of the tapered structure of the coupler, Fig. 6 is a graph illustrating a typical coupler response as a function of elongation with several phase matching points; Fig. 7a is a graph showing the variation in contrast between two polanzation responses, as well as their sum; Fig. 7b is a graph showing the same vanation in contrast as in Fig 7a, but plotted in dB; Fig. 8 is a graph showing two polanzation beatings as a function of wavelength; Fig. 9 is a simplified diagram of a fabncation set-up for manufactuπng couplers of the present invention, Fig. 10 illustrates the provision of slots to hold the fibers parallel and in contact with each other during their fusion; Fig. 11 illustrates the packaging of the coupler; Fig. 12 is a graph showing an actual wavelength response of a 20 nm multiplexer; Fig. 13 is a graph showing an actual wavelength response of an 8.4 nm multiplexer; Fig. 14 is a graph showing an actual wavelength response of a 3.2 nm multiplexer; and Fig. 15 is a graph showing an actual wavelength response of a 1.6 nm multiplexer. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The invention will now be described by way of prefened, non-limitative embodiments which will describe multiplexers and demultiplexers operating m the , The method used to fabricate such couplers is general m nature and can be adapted to other ranges and can be used with fibers other than those mentioned herein To make a good fused coupler, one must make a structure that excites the two supermodes LP 01 and LP π of the fused structure, without loss to higher order modes. This can be achieved by choosing a quasi-matched or matched cladding fiber, such as the one with the index profile given in Fig. 1. In Fig 1 , p ∞ is core radius, p g0 is cladding radius, n ∞ is core refractive index, n go is cladding refractive index and « ex is the exteπor refractive index Coming SMF-28 standard fiber that has a single-mode operation above 1200 nm is suitable for this purpose Such matched- cladding fibers, when fused together side-by-side, will create a single-cladding structure with two fiber cores. The cross-section of this structure can be characterized by the degree of fusion, as shown in Fig. 2 where x and y represent normalized dimensions with reference to the radius of the fiber and f is the degree of fusion. In this model, the distance between the fiber cores is given by the conservation of area between the core and the outer boundary on the x-axis. In a fiber fused coupler with a single fused region, the degree of fusion along the coupler (along the propagation z- axis) varies from 0 to a value in the middle of the coupler, back to zero at the other end, the fibers being separate at both ends of the coupler. To understand better the optical response of a coupler, one can numeπcalh model the waveguide properties. The local propagation constants of the 4 supermodes (LP 01x , LP 01y , LP llx , LPji ) depends on the shape of cross-section, the degree of fusion and the reduction ratio defined as the local dimension divided by the initial untapered fiber dimension, and on wavelength. Because the polarizations φ x and φ, are , reduction ratio change along this length, one has to calculate the propagation constants for all the different shapes and sizes possible With an appropπate and precise numencal method, one can calculate these values for a coupler composed of two fibers that have the refractive index profile presented in Fig. 1 This is done by first modelling the scalar beat length defined as Z t , = 2π/(B,-B 2 ). The beat length is presented in Fig 3, for a wavelength of 1550 nm as a function of reduction ratio, and for several degrees of fusion as shown m Fig 2 The beat length is the length at two-modes, in a longitudinally uniform profile, required to accumulate a phase difference of 2π In other words, it is the length in a coupler that the power takes to go from one fiber to the other and back again In practical terms this value gives an idea on the length of the coupler If a coupler is elongated to N cycles, that means that the modes have to accumulate N beat lengths, thus one can deduce, if average profile parameters can be estimated, what the length of the coupling region should be. Reversely, if the degree of fusion and the pull length are known, the approximate dimension of the coupling region can be deduced In Figure 3, it is shown that the beat length decreases exponentially with the reduction ratio and with the degree of fusion. In the best case (degree of fusion 1 ). its value is above 10 cm for a reduction ratio of 0.4 Thus, the fused structure has to be tapered to more than half of its onginal size in order for any significant coupling to occur On the other hand, for very small dimensions, the beat length can easily be of the order of 100 μm, making multiple beat length structure a few centimeters long feasible. Also, one can note that there is no big difference between the degree of fusion of 0.6 and above but the vanation can be quite large for degrees of fusion profile can greatly affect the length of the coupler that has a given number of beat cycles N As pointed out earlier, the greater the number of cycles N, the nanower the wavelength response But Fig 3 does not help in determining the wavelength dependence of the coupler of N beats For this, the graph plotted in Fig 4 is useful wherein the wavelength peπod Λ times N, is plotted as a function of the same parameter as m Fig.3 Again, it shows a dependence with size and fusion The smaller the wavelength of NΛ, the smaller the wavelength spacing for a given N As can also be seen, the relation of a large N makes a small wavelength spacing This data shows that, even for a specific number of cycles, the wavelength peπod can be adjusted changing the degree of fusion. Reducmg the degree of fusion will make the period smaller, but the coupler will be longer. This is also true if the longitudinal profile is changed. A profile with a larger waist will have a smaller peπod, but will also be longer The effects observed with Fig. 3 and Fig 4 can be used to design any multiplexer, because they tell m what way a profile can be changed to obtain a given wavelength penod This can help to tune and fine tune the fabncation parameters These curves however do not give indication of polaπzation effects For that, the graph plotted in Fig 5 provides the ratio of polarization Q Λ = (ΛvΛ / CtV+Λ , that gives an idea of the vanation of the birefringence as a function of the degree of fusion and the reduction ratio. First, one can see that the birefringence is never null, except for couplers that have an extremely small degree of fusion Furthermore, this occurs only at a smgle diameter. The ma domam of application is in the non-zero degree of , dependence always mcreases as the cross-section decreases, and that increase is exponential so that it is very large for smaller reduction ratios This essentially means that because the coupler cross-section gets smaller as the coupler ^ elongated, the polanzation dependence increases. This also means that the wavelength dependence can be adjusted with the degree of fusion and the shape of the longitudinal profile, as is the case with birefringence. Thus, these parameters can both be used to change both φ x and φ as well as their difference. In other words, a smaller waist profile will reduce the length of the coupler but increase the birefringence, as would a degree of fusion of 1 compared to a coupler with a degree of fusion of 0.5. A very small degree of fusion will increase the birefringence even more and also create a much longer coupler. Thus, adjusting the profile will make it possible to phase match the two polarization phases at a given wavelength period. It is important to note that such matching conditions are not unique and several other solutions can be chosen. This is clear if one looks at a typical coupler response as a function of elongation, such as illustrated in Fig. 6, that shows several phase matching pomts A, B, C. This figure simulates the transmission response in one output branch of the coupler, if monitored with a smgle wavelength. The beating phenomenon is evident and the proper observation can be made to the effect that the beating between the two polaπzations causes the modulation. In this example, the light source is polaπsed and the launch conditions are such that the contrast of the response at the node where the two polanzations are out of phase is not 0. The point were the contrast is maximum conesponds to a polarization phase matching point. This variation in contrast s ustrated n F g. 7a. ere, the two polarization responses P0, P 2 X and P,*, P 2 y as well as their sums P, and P 2 are shown. One can see that the contrast of P,, P 2 oscillations is reduced as the two polarizations move out of phase. The contrast is a very good indication of the quality of the coupler. If the contrast is not close to 1 , the component will have both excess loss at the extremum point of the transmission and polarization dependent loss in the wavelength operation band around the extremum wavelength. Polarization dependence loss is the difference between the transmission of the two polarization states as shown in Fig. 7b, which is the same as Fig. 7a but plotted in dB. Thus a bad contrast implies both a bad isolation and a bad insertion loss, and a large polarization dependent loss. The parameter that can be measured with most precision is the isolation between P, and P 2 , thus to see if the coupler is good, one can look at the peak isolation. If it is greater that 20 dB (99% power transfer) that means that 1% is not coupled, thus creating a 0.03 dB loss in the coupler in excess of its excess loss at the peak wavelength. If the isolation is 15 dB, then the insertion loss will be 3% (0.1 dB) greater. If the isolation is 10 dB, then the loss will be more than 0.4 dB. To make a good coupler, one should aim at the isolation to be as large as possible, 20 dB being a target were the loss becomes negligible. The polarization degradation of the envelope has a direct consequence on the number of wavelengths that can be efficiently multiplexed. Fig. 8 shows two polarization beatings as a function of wavelength of two couplers A and B. In the transmission curves conesponding to coupler A, one can see several peaks with more than 20 dB of isolation. Thus, for two wavelengths, several peaks can be selected for proper operation of the multiplexer. As a matter a fact, such a device could easily be use to emu tip ex severa wave eng s wi goo per ormance up to wit more that 20 dB isolation in this example). However, if the birefringence is much larger, such as presented in the transmission curves conesponding to coupler B, the number of wavelengths is more limited. In such a case, two wavelengths can be adequateh multiplexed with more than 20dB of isolation and two more, but with 15 dB of isolation. If the polarization dependence is even greater, then multiplexing even two wavelengths becomes difficult. In the two latter cases, and especially m the last one, the positiomng of the phase match point between the two multiplexed wavelengths is essential for the proper operation of the multiplexer One can determine that this is the case if the two isolations at the multiplexed wavelengths are equal For more than two wavelengths of operation, the rule is to place the phase matched point at half the distance between the smallest and the largest wavelengths to be multiplexed Optimally, one wants to always operate the component at the first polarization phase matching point versus elongation because this minimizes any polanzation dependent loss, such as point A m Fig. 6 and because, as stated above, the polanzation dependence increases as the coupler waist is reduced. Theoretically, one could fabncate a coupler with a desired wavelength period at the first matched point (A in Fig. 6), by making the coupler long enough with a waist large enough The limiting design aspect then becomes the length of the component. It can be limited by the maximum package dimension or the length of a tapered section that will survive vibrations or other mechanical stresses Because of this, one often has to make components shorter, thus the birenfringence will be larger and one may have to go to the second, third (B, C m Fig. 6), etc. polanzation phase matching point to obtain the correct period. Some of the 1.6 nm channel spacing couplers have been made at the 5 po a zat on matc ng po nt. o un erstan t e egra at on o t e per ormance as one goes to higher order matching points, there is plotted in Fig. 7a and 7b the wavelength response of two couplers that have the same period, but which is achieved at the third matching point for the first and at the fourth matching point for the second. Physically, the first coupler is longer by approximately 1 cm than the second The isolation for the second coupler is worst than for the first coupler. If the degradation is within acceptable parameters, shorter couplers can thus be fabricated To design a coupler with predefined properties, one has to operate iteratively on a high performance fabrication setup. The jig must be precise and be able to reproduce a coupler given a set of identical fabrication parameters. To develop and fabricate the multiplexing and demultiplexing couplers of the present invention, a semi-automated fabrication setup was built that relies on computer control and technician intervention to be able to make repeated adjustments in the couplers. The main characteristic of the fabrication setup is that it permits a control of the fusion and the tapering profile enabling the modification of the profile to change and adjust the wavelength characteristics of the coupler from one trial to another. The computer uses a fabrication recipe that is a detailed file containing all the required parameters of fabrication. The operator can stop the process during fabrication to verify the parameters, such as the degree of fusion and the longitudinal profile, and to check for any deviance from the fabrication specifications. A simplified diagram of the setup is illustrated in Fig. 9. In this setup, two fiber holders 30 and 32 are mounted on motonzed stages 34 and 36 that can pull on fibers 38, 40 to elongate the middle portion 42 where the coupling is produced. These stages 34, 36 have precise positioning resolution, to provide satisfactory control of the coup er e n ro u i p ws , ypica the positiomng properties are at 0.1 μm resolution The fiber holders 30, 32 are such as to maintain the fibers 38, 40 firmly in place so that they will not slip dunng elongation For the reproducibility of the process, there are also provided positioning devices 31, 33 which allow reproducible fiber positioning with respect to the heat source 48 and/or heat source 50, so that the longitudinal profile in the coupling region 42 can be reproduced from one fabncation to another and the substrate elongation always produces the same phase shift in the component The heat source 48. 50 can be a microtorch, a small oven or another heating element, such as a laser, e g a C0 2 laser that can be focussed on different parts of the taper profile. Such a heat source is mounted on a motonzed stage 52 than can be moved in x, y, z directions as shown anows x, y, z. In the present example, the heat source 48 was a propane-oxygen microtorch with precise gas flow controllers to make the flame reproducible The second heat source 50 was a similar torch with a torch tip giving a hotter flame, enabling to accelerate the fusion segment of the fabncation process. Furthermore, as illustrated in Fig. 10, a special mechanical adjustment slot 54 is provided in the positiomng device 31, mounted on stage 34, to hold the fibers 38, 40, which have been stopped of their protective jackets, in parallel contact with each other dunng the fusion of the fibers m the middle zone 42. A similar, conesponding anangement (not shown) is also provided on stage 36 (Fig 9) to achieve the required alignment The fabncatmg set up is normally enclosed m a protective shell (not shown) which limits undesired air movements around the heated fiber section in the zone 42. e a πcatmg proce ure is genera y as o ows Fibers 38, 40 are stopped of their protective plastic jackets in the middle region 42 and thoroughly cleaned. The fibers 38, 40 are then placed m the holders 30, 32 in the area where they are still provided with the plastic jackets and are clamped in these holders The fibers 38, 40 are properly aligned with each other in the middle region 42 with the use of positiomng devices 31, 32 provided with suitable alignment slots, such as 54, so that they are held in parallel contact with each other A computer program that controls both the torches' positiomng stage 52 and the fiber holders 34 36 is used to first bπng the hotter heat source 50 close to the fibers in the middle zone 42. To produce a coupler, the fibers are fused with a given fusion profile, usually a few millimeters long. Once the fusion is realized, the torch 50 is removed and the degree of fusion is checked to insure that the proper profile has been realized This fusion profile is one of the parameters that needs to be adjusted to match both the wavelength properties and the polarization properties of the coupler. Because the fiber is not tapered during the fusion step, one can measure the width of the fused region by looking at the two optical fibers from an axis orthogonal to the fiber plane. As illustrated m Fig. 2, the width is proportional to the degree of fusion The next step is the elongation of the fused fibers. For this, the flame of torch 48 is used It is less hot and wider than the flame of the torch 50 used for the fusion, and can be brought close enough to the fibers to make them ductile. The motors of the motonzed stages 34. 36 then pull the fibers as shown by anows 44, 46, creatmg a fiber taper profile This profile will depend on the flame heat pattern and position along the length of the taper and on the pulling speed. It is important to realize an adiabatic profile, that is, a profile that has a taper slope small enough to produce any coupling with higher order optical modes, which would in the end translate into undesired loss To achieve wide enough flame, one can brush the torch back and forth along the length to simulate a larger flame. One important point in profile design is that the brush width can be vaπed live dunng the elongation and this will change the profile shape and thus the polanzation and wavelength properties The elongation process is stopped when a match point between the wavelength period and phase is achieved This can be realized by momtonng the evolution of the wavelength response It should be noted however, that usually one cannot precisely determine the match point dunng the elongation process because the heat of the flame changes the index of the glass and thus the phase of the coupler, which should be measured at room temperature. As stated earlier, the elongation process can be interrupted to insure a proper measurement of the evolution of the wavelength properties During this interruption, the torch is removed and the pulling stopped so that optical properties can be measured at that point and the evolution of the wavelength period as a function of elongation can thus be noted. When the wavelength properties are ver\ close to the target, one can use very short pulls (sometimes only a few microns) after each stoppage, by reheating the coupler for a very short time This enables micro- adjustment, making the wavelength response shift only a few tenths of nm As previously mentioned, the final properties may be adjusted using a cold pull After the predetermined wavelength period is obtained, the coupler is secured to a suitable substrate as shown in Fig 11 In this figure, the coupler 56 is secured to a ngid substrate 58 by adhesive bonds 60, 62, 64, 68. The substrate 58 is then inserted into a protective tube (not shown) or otherwise packaged , recipe that would provide the polanzation phase match with the desired wavelength response, even if it were not the first matched point One can, however, easily learn from previous toals to determine the proper fabncation parameter When starting from scratch, the first thing is to determine the limit of adiabaticity of the slope of the coupler. One must first start with the fusion process If the fusion is too localised, the deformation of the fiber cores will be nonadiabatic and cause insertion loss. Even though its loss may be reduced dunng tapenng. it is better to realize a fusion with larger flame or to brush the fusion flame to reduce the fusion slopes and achieve an adiabatic, lossless fusion If the design requires a short coupler length, a high degree of fusion, which also conesponds to a smaller polanzation dependence, is preferable for the adiabaticity trials. After the fusion, the tapenng is done with a given flame and brush width. If coupling without loss is observed, then the coupler is adiabatic. One then makes a second toal with a smaller brush width If the coupler is adiabatic again, the trial process is repeated until some loss is observed The last width that is lossless makes a profile which is at the adiabaticity limit and will conespond m the design to the minimum brush width With the SMF-28 fiber. this brush width was found to be approximately 6 mm for a 0.8 mm flame It is important to note that this minimum brush width is important only in the first 10 mm of elongation At such an elongation, the waist conesponds approximately to the point of the core to cladding mode transition, where the adiabaticity cnteπa is the most restnctive After that point, where some coupling has occuπed, the brush width can be progressively reduced without any loss penalties , coupler using the minimum adiabatic limit and pulls the coupler though several polarization cycles. At each cycle, the wavelength period is noted for each matched point. One thus knows that using the same recipes, the indicated periods will be achieved for the noted polarization matched points. As stated earlier, this provides little chance of getting the exact desired period. However, such period will be between two of the noted periods. One can thus change the degree of fusion and profile to make the match. If the profile can be made longer, then the previous match point period can be shifted toward the target by increasing the brush width. If the coupler is to long, then the following polarization matched point can be shifted by decreasing, in some parts of the recipe, the brush width. This can be repeated for different recipes, giving a matrix of period polarization matched points as shown in Figs. 12 to 15. The several different recipes can achieve the same properties, in the same way that different elongations can achieve the same wavelength periods. The following examples will illustrate the above described points: Example 1 The multiplexer of this example was produced to multiplex two wavelengths at 20 nm spacing (between 1530 nm and 1550 nm). In doing the first trial, it was found that the first match point period was 22 nm and the second match point peπod was 17 nm for a constant 6 mm brush width. Increase of the brush width to 7 mm after 25 mm elongation was made, thereby shifting the first match point penod to 20 nm. The final wavelength response is shown in Fig. 12. In this example, as seen in Fig. 12, there are five wavelengths that can be multiplexed or demultiplexed with 20 dB or more of isolation. Example 2 In this example, a coupler with 8 4 nm spacmg was produced (between 1550 nm and 1558 4 nm) In the first toal, the spacing of 8 4 nm is achieved between the third and fourth matched points Similarly, increasing the brush width as descπbed m Example 1 , it is possible to shift the third match point to the desired value Moreover, by increasing the brush width to 10 mm, it was possible to shift the first match point to 8 4 nm However, this makes the coupler too long If a shorter coupler is desired, the brush width can be reduced to 4 mm after 25 mm elongation thus shifting the fourth matched point to 8 4 nm The final wavelength response is shown in Fig 13 If the coupler is intended to operate only at 2 wavelengths, this does not present a problem, because the solution is good for several wavelengths However, if it is desired to make the coupler function at more than 4 wavelengths, the isolation degrades too much by gomg to the fourth matched point. It is better then to use the second or even the first match point to realize such coupler, even if it must be longer Example 3 In this example, a coupler with 3 41 nm spacing was produced (between 1598 60 nm and 1602 01 nm) The response for this coupler is shown in Fig 14 In such couplers, the isolation properties degrade considerably because the waist gets smaller and the polanzation effect gets larger It is possible to achieve 20 dB isolation even when using the 15 th match point This is possible by brushing very wide after the diameter has been reduced sigmficantly The length of the coupler becomes more than 60 mm If a shorter coupler is desired, the idea is to reduce the cross-section , incremental fashion to keep the waist as large as possible. If the waist is not further reduced, then the polarization degradation will not increase. The period will diminish as elongation proceeds from matched point to matched point, but the isolation between peaks will not change Example 4 A 1.7 nm WDM coupler was made (between 1600 7 nm and 1602 4 nm) having a length of less than 10 mm The response is shown in Fig. 15. The same pnnciple as described above was used. Even then, however, the isolation is around 14 dB for 4 wavelengths as compared to about 17 dB for the 3.41 nm spacing The pnnciples illustrated by the above examples can be applied to other wavelengths, other spacings and other fibers. For example, around 980 nm, a different fiber is used. It has 6 μm diameter core instead of 9 μm diameter of the SMF-28 fiber used in the above examples. Because of the wavelength, the first match point period is close to 10 nm instead of 20 nm as in Example 1 above. Thus, a very nanow spacing will be obtained for the same match point number and the coupler will be shorter. The methodology and adjustments described above would also apply to this situation As already mentioned earlier, another parameter can be changed to optimize the wavelength spacing, namely the degree of fusion between the fibers. Although is can be used for any wavelength spacing, it is particularly useful for optimizing large spacings, above 20 nm, because they require an increase in the polarization dependance, the first match point being normally around 20 nm. Using the same elongation recipe as described in Example 1 above, and illustrated in Fig. 12, the first ma c e point peπo can e s i e o nm y re ucing e egree o usion to Even larger spacmg can be realized by also reducmg the brush width, which makes the waist smaller and thus the polarization dependence larger The invention is not limited to the specific embodiments and examples descπbed above Many modifications obvious to those skilled in the art may be made without departing from the spmt of the invention and the scope of the following claims

Claims: 1. Method of fabrication of multiplexing and demultiplexing single-mode fiber optic couplers which comprises: (a) aligning two single-mode fibers, which have been stopped of their protective plastic jackets and cleaned, so that they are held in contact with each other; (b) fusing said fibers in a fusing zone, using a suitable heat source to achieve a predetermined fusion profile; and (c) elongating the fused fibers by controllably pulling them longitudinally while heating them with a suitable heat source so as to create a coupling zone with an adiabatic profile, and stopping the elongation process when a match point between wavelength period and polarization phase is achieved, thereby producing the desired multiplexing or demultiplexing coupler. 2. Method according to claim 1 , further comprising interrupting and resuming the elongation of the fused fibers, while monitoring the wavelength response during each interruption, so as to achieve a precise match point between the wavelength period and the polarization phase. 3. Method according to claim 2, wherein the interruption is done by removing the heat source, stopping the pulling of the fused fibers and measuring the evolution of the wavelength period at that point and then reheating and re-pulling the fibers until a desired wavelength response is obtained. 4. Method according to claim 3, wherein when the wavelength period is close to the desired target, very short re-heating periods and pulls are made to produce the precise wavelength response required to achieve the polanzation phase match point. which may be any point m a series of match points, depending on the desired length of the coupler. 5 Method according to claim 4, wherein, if the polarization phase match point is slightly overshot, it is brought back by a final cold pull, without re-heating the fibers 6. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, which compnses aligning of the two fibers m parallel alignment without crossing or twisting said fibers with each other 7 Method according to claim 6, wherein the parallel alignment of the fibers is achieved by providing a mechamcal aligning slot m fiber positioning devices at each end of the fusing zone. 8. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the fibers are fused using a heat source which is hotter than the heat source used for elongation. 9. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein by adjusting the degree of fusion between the fibers, a desired shift in the polarization match point is produced. 10 Method according to claim 9, wherein by realizing the fusion with a large flame, the fusion slopes are reduced to achieve an adiabatic, lossless fusion 11. Method according to claim 9, wherein by brushing the fibers with a fusion flame, the fusion slopes are reduced to achieve an adiabatic, lossless fusion 12. Method according to claim 9, 10 or 11, wherein by reducing the degree of fusion, a larger polanzation match point spacing is realized 13. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 12 wherein, when elongating the fused fibers, the heating is carried out by a flame on a torch which can be brushed , brush width dunng the elongation, the profile shape and thus the polanzation and wavelength properties are modified as desired 14 Method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the two smgle-mode fibers are identical 15 Method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the two single-mode fibers are dissimilar. 16 Method according to anyone of claims 1 to 15, wherein more than two fibers are used to produce multiple wavelength couplers 17. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 16, wherein the obtained coupler is secured to a suitable substrate and packaged. 18. Method according to claim 1 , nerein the fusing and elongation are controlled by a computer program providing a repeatable recipe for these operations. 19. A multiplexing or demultiplexing single mode fiber optic coupler having a nanow channel spacing of a minimum of 0.4 nm, produced in accordance with any one of claims 1 to 16.

Inventors: GONTHIER FRANCOIS, GONTHIER, FRANCOIS
Applicants: GONTHIER FRANCOIS, ITF OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC T, GONTHIER, FRANCOIS, ITF OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.-TECHNOLOGIES OPTIQ
Application year: 2000
Main classification: G02B6
IPC codes: G02B6