CHARGED FILTRATION MEMBRANES AND USES THEREFOR

Abstract: The invention relates to charged filtration membranes and their use for separation of a protein from solvent, low molecular weight solutes or a mixture of proteins. Modification of the membranes to generate charge includes modification of membrane pores to alter charge within a pore and alter the size of a pore. Consequently, the protein is separated from other solutes in a mixture based on size as well as net protein charge and membrane charge.

Description: CHARGED FILTRATION MEMBRANES AND USES THEREFOR FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to charged filtration membranes and their use for separation of a protein from solvent, low molecular weight solutes or a mixture of proteins Modification of the membranes to generate charge includes modification of membrane pores to alter charge within a pore and alter the size of a pore Consequently, the protein is separated from other solutes in a mixture based on size as well as net protein charge and membrane charge BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION A filtration membrane useful for protein separations is a synthetic (frequently polymeric) selective barrier for industnal or lab-scale microfϊltration (MF) or ultrafitration (UF) (see Leos J Zeman and Andrew L Zydney, "Micro filtration and Ultrafiltration Principles and Applications," 1996, Marcel Dekker, Inc , p 3) In these processes, certain feed stream components, such as proteins, pass through pores of the membrane mto a filtrate, while other, usually larger, proteins or components are retained by the membrane in the retentate (see Zeman and Zydney, supra, P 3) Protein ultrafiltration is a pressure-driven membrane process used for the concentration or purification of protein solutions (Robert van Reis and Andrew L Zvdney "Protein Ultrafiltration" in Encyclopedia of Bioprocess Technology Fermentation. Biocatalvsis. and Bioseparation. M C Flickinger and S W Drew, eds , John Wiley & Sons, Inc ( 1999) p 2197) UF membranes typically have a mean pore size between 10 and 500 Angstroms, which is between the mean pore size of reverse osmosis and microfiltration membranes Ultrafiltration separates solutes based on differences in the rate of filtration of different components across the membrane in response to a given pressure dnvmg force (R van Reis and A L Zydney, supra, p 2197) Solute filtration rates, and thus membrane selectivity, are determined by both thermodynamic and hydrodynamic interactions (R van Reis and A L Zydney, supra, p 2197) Ultrafiltration is frequently used m downstream processmg for pro tern concentration, buffer exchange and desaltmg, protein purification, virus clearance, and clarification (R van Reis and A L Zydney, supra, p 2197) Protein purification is also accomplished usmg high-performance tangential flow filtration (HPTFF), with the desired protem collected in either the retentate or filtrate depending on the relative filtration rates (R van Reis and A L Zydney, supra, p 2197) HPTFF is useful for separating proteins of similar size using semipermeable membranes (See. for example. R van Reis et al Biotech Bioeng 56 71-82 (1997) and R van Reis et al J Memb Sci 59 133-142 ( 1999)) HPTFF achieves high selectivity by controlling filtrate flux and device fluid mechanics in order to minimize fouling and exploit the effects of concentration polarization (R van Reis et al , J Memb Sci 159 133- 142 (1999)) Despite the value of these advanced filtration methods, there is a need for improved filtration membrane charactenstics such that separation speed may be increased without sacrificing membrane selectivity Such improvements would reduce cost of separation and increase yield of valuable proteins SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to filtration membranes possessing a net charge, either positive or negative, and further relates to methods of making the charged membranes and using them in the separation of a protein from a solute or mixture of solutes, such as salts, buffer solutes, or proteins The proteins are separated based, in part, on the size of the proteins and, in part, on the net charge of the proteins The charged membranes repel proteins having the same charge polarity as the membrane, thereby retaining such proteins on the upstream side of the membrane Proteins pass through the membrane pores if they have a net neutral charge or a polarity opposite that of the membrane and are smaller than the average pore diameter The sieving property of the charged membranes of the mvention. measured WO 01/08792 PCT/USOO/l 9964 as the sieving coefficient, is dramatically improved relative to an uncharged membrane, while permeability is not sacrificed Conventional protein filtration balances membrane permeability with solute sieving Ideally permeability is high to allow rapid separation, while sieving is low for selective retention of the desired protein Using conventional filtration membranes, however, one of ordinary skill m the art sacrifices permeability to gam selectivity, thereby limiting separation speed and protein recovery, respectfully The charged membranes of the invention, on the other hand, provide high permeability, thereby speeding separation, while lowering sieving for more selective separation and higher yield of the desired protein In one aspect, the invention involves a filtration membrane covalently modified with a charged compound or a compound capable of bemg chemically modified to possess a charge The filtration membrane may be any membrane including, but not limited to. cellulose, cellulose diacetate and tπacetate, cellulose nitrate, and cellulose diacetate/cellulose nitrate blends Filtration membranes are commercially available from vaπous sources including, but not limited to, Milhpore Corp . Bedford, MA, and Pall Filtron Corp , Northborough, MA Preferably the filtration membrane has hydroxvl groups available on the membrane surface for reaction with a deπvatizing compound Preferably the hydroxvl groups are primary alcohol moieties, such as those of a cellulose matrix Preferably, the membrane is cellulose, more preferably the membrane is composite regenerated cellulose (CRC) (See. tor example, U S Patent No 5,522.991 for a descπption of cellulosic membranes ) A cellulose membrane has the advantages of inherent low fouling characteπstics. hydrophilicity, the availability of primary alcohol groups (from the glucose moieties of cellulose) for reaction with a charged compound, and stability under alkaline conditions A CRC membrane has the additional advantage of mechanical strength In one embodiment, the membrane is a cellulose membrane, preferably a CRC membrane, modified to have a net charge (positive or negative), wherem the permeability versus sieving performance is enhanced For example, for a given membrane permeability, the sievmg coefficient is decreased by at least 1 5 fold for a protein retained on the upstream side of the membrane when the membrane and retained protein have like charge polarity (positive or negative) In another embodiment, the invention involves a membrane, preferably a CRC membrane, in which a plurality of the primary alcohol groups are covalently linked to a charged compound Preferably, the charged compound retains its charge under the conditions used to separate the protein from solutes or a mixture of protems In another embodiment, the charged compound is positively charged The positive charge may be generated from any compound that retains its charge under the conditions of protein separation For example, the charge may be generated by, but not limited to, an amine, a quaternary amine. and the like Where the compound is an amine, preferably the amine has two or three lower alkyl groups covalently attached to achieve an amme that is capable of mamtaming its charge polarity under the conditions of protein separation Preferably, the lower alkyl groups have from one to 8 carbon atoms More preferably, the alkyl groups are methyl, ethyl, and propyl groups For example, the amme moiety of the positively charged compound may be a tnalkyl or dialkyl amine, such as tπmethyl amine, tnethyl amme, diethylammo ethyl, and the like In another embodiment, the charged compound is negatively charged The negative charge may be generated from any compound that retains its charge under the conditions of protein separation For example, the charge may be generated by, but not limited to, an acid, such as a carboxyhc acid, a sulfomc acid, carboxymethyl sulfonate, methyl sulfonate, and the like In still another embodiment, the charged compound compπses a linker arm between the charged moiety and the moiety covalently linked to a reactive group of the membrane Where the membrane is a CRC membrane, the linker arm separates the charged moietv and a primary alcohol group of the cellulosic matnx with which the linker reacts The linker arm allows the charged moiety to project away from the surface of the membrane Where the charged compound modifies the surface of a membrane pore, the linker arm allows the compound to project into the lumen of the pore, thereby modifying the size of the pore Larger membrane pores will be reduced in size, smaller pores are filled, and still smaller pores fail to be penetrated by the compound due to steric hmderance and/or electrostatic repulsion Consequently, membrane pore size distribution is narrowed, providmg improved protein separation In another embodiment, the linker arm compπses an alkyl chain of from one to and including twenty carbon atoms The alkyl cham may be branched and the branch may link a first charged moiety to a second (or additional) charged moiety The linker arm may be any chain of atoms or molecular moieties that are themselves inert to the reaction conditions used to link the charge to the membrane, and inert to the conditions of protein separation The length of the linker arm is chosen according to the desired pore size modification Preferably the linker arm length allows the reactive charged compound to penetrate and react within some of the pores thereby narrowing the pore size distribution Linker arms may include, but are not limited to, carbohydrates, dextrans, sacchaπdes, peptides (havmg charged or uncharged ammo acid side chams), polymers (such as polyvinyl deπvatives, polyether deπvatives, and the like), and like chams Where the filtration membrane is hydrophi c and aqueous reaction conditions are used to link the charged compound to the membrane, the linker arm is preferably hydrophihc and the charged compound m its reactive form (for reaction with the membrane) is soluble m the aqueous reaction solution Accordmgly, the invention may comprise a linker arm that is an alkyl cham of between one and twenty carbon atoms m length, preferably one to ten, more preferably one to seven carbon atoms Alternatively, the linker arm may be a carbohydrate or dextran cham of from one to, and including, fifteen sacchande moieties, preferably one to ten, more preferably one to five sacchande moieties The linker arm may be a peptide of one to twenty five ammo acids, preferably one to fifteen, more preferably one to ten ammo acids In addition, the linker arm may be any polymer of from one to twenty five repeat units that is inert to the reaction and separation conditions The linker arm may be branched, wherem each branch is shorter than the length of the main branch (the linker arm) linked to the reactive group Each branch may end m a charged moiety and the charge of each charged moiety is the same polarity (either positive or negative) In an embodiment, the reactive charged compound has the general formula, X-L-Y. where X is a reactive group that reacts with a reactive group on the membrane. L is the linker arm. and Y is the charged group Accordmgly where the membrane is a CRC membrane and the reactive groups on the membrane are primary alcohol groups, X of the reactive charged compound is a moiety that promotes reaction with the primary alcohol groups under aqueous conditions As such, X is preferably a leaving group susceptible to nucleophi c attack by a primary alcohol group to form an ether linkage between the cellulosic carbohydrate matrix and the linker arm of the charged compound Thus, useful reactive charged compounds are alkyl halides, and the reactive group is a halide including, but not limited to, chloπde, bromide, or iodide In yet another aspect, the mvention involves a method of making a charged membrane of the invention, the method comprising reactmg a reactive charged compound with a plurality of reactive sites on the membrane such that the charged portion of the charged compound is covalently linked to the membrane After reaction, the net charge of the membrane is positive or negative Preferably, the reactive charged compound penetrates a plurality of membrane pores and modifies the pore size distribution Preferably, the pore size distribution is narrowed In an embodiment, the method of the invention compπses a reactive charged compound that is uncharged duπng the covalent attachment to the membrane and is later reacted to create the charge (either positive or negative) that generates the net charge for the membrane The reactive charged compound mav be added to the end of the linker arm (or branches) after the linker arm is covalently attached to the membrane Where the charged group is positive, the charged group may be an amme, a quaternary amme, such as a dialkyl or tπalkyl. and the like Where the charged group is negative, the charged group is an acid, such as a sulfonic acid, a carboxyhc acid, a carboxymethyl sulfonyl group, and the like The charged group is chosen as a moiety that will maintain its charge under the conditions of the protein separation method of the invention In another aspect, the invention involves a membrane filtration method for separating a protein from a solute or mixture of solutes (such as salts, buffer solutes, or proteins) using a charged membrane of the invention Preferably the method involves (1) contacting a pro tern withm a solute mixture with a charged cellulosic membrane, more preferably a CRC membrane that has been reacted with a reactive charged compound to generate a link, via a linker arm, to a charged group, wherein the protein to be retamed has a net charge that is the same as the charge polaπty of the membrane under the separation conditions, and (2) separating the protein from at least one other solute or protem in the mixture, wherein the other protein has a different net charge or is neutral In an embodiment of the invention, pπor to contacting a protein within a mixture with the membrane, the pH of the mixture is altered causing the net charge of the desired protem to be the same as the charge polaπty as the membrane At the same time, the pH change renders at least one solute to be separated from the desired protem neutral or opposite the membrane charge Dunng the contacting and separating steps, the neutral solute passes through the charged membrane into the filtrate, while the desired charged protem is retamed on the upstream side of the membrane This embodiment of the mvention may be repeated to successively remove solutes from the protem mixture In an embodiment of the invention, the filtration method is ultrafiltration (see generally, van Reis and Zydney, "Protem Ultrafiltration," supra, p 2197) In another embodiment of the invention, the filtration method is high-performance tangential flow filtration (see generally, R van Reis, et al , J Memb Sci 159.133-142 (1999)). These and other objects, advantages and features of the present mvention will become apparent to those persons skilled in the art upon reading the details of the compositions, methods, and uses as more fully set forth below Each reference cited herein is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety with particular attention to the descπption of subject matter associated with the context of the citation DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig 1 is a diagram showing charged spheres representmg proteins having a net charge based on the pKa values of surface ammo acids at a given pH of the separation solutions (retentate and filtrate) A filtration membrane is diagrammed having a net positive charge Flow of the separation solution is in the downward direction through the membrane, retaming proteins having the same charge as the membrane (positive) in the retentate, while net neutral and negative proteins flow through the membrane with the filtrate Fig 2A is a diagram of a cellulose membrane reactmg with a reactive charged compound, 3-bromopropyl tnmethyl ammonium bromide The -OH moieties represent the pπmary alcohols of a CRC matrix The primary alcohols react with the alkyl ha de in this diagram to form a covalent ether linkage connecting the charged moiety to the cellulose matrix Fig 2B is a similar diagram of a cellulose membrane in which the pπmary alcohols reacted with a reactive charged compound.3-bromopropyl sulfonate, to form a covalent ether linkage In these examples, the reactions are base catalyzed Fig 3 is a diagram showing a pore of a filtration membrane reacted with 3-bromopropyl tnmethyl ammonium bromide One pore is enlarged to show the charged compound linked to the surface of the pore and projectmg into the lumen of the pore As a result of the surface modification, the pore size is effectively decreased In addition, the positive charge of the pore repels a protein of like charge, increasing the likelihood that the protem will be retamed relative to neutral proteins in a mixture Fig 4 is a graph showmg the relationship between membrane permeability (x axis) and protein sievmg (y axis) for ten commercially available uncharged filtration membranes The graph indicates that increasing permeability corresponds to an increase in sievmg The test solute for the commercial membranes, having a mean size of 10 kD, was uncharged dextran "F" and "M" refer to membrane manufacturers Filtron and Milhpore, respectively Fig 5 is a graph showing the relationship between filtrate flux (ml/mm, x axis) and sieving (y axis) for uncharged and charged membranes havmg 300 kD or 1000 kD MW cutoffs Flux is proportional to membrane permeability (see, Zeman and Zydney, supra, p 16) As flux increases, sieving increases Unlike in conventional membranes, however, when charge is added to the membrane, the sieving coefficient of a like-charged protem decreases for a given flux value Fig 6 is a graph showing the relationship between membrane permeability (y axis) and sieving (x axis) for an uncharged membrane having a 300 kD average pore size (white diamond) and an uncharged membrane havmg a 1000 kD average pore size (white circle) defining the solid line A positively charged membrane having a 300 kD average pore size (black diamond) and a positively charged membrane havmg a lOOOkD average pore size (black circle) define the dashed lme The solute protem is positively charged recombinant human antι-HER2 monoclonal antibody (rhuMAb HER2) The data mdicate that for a given permeability, sieving is dramatically decreased (m this example, by approximately two orders of magnitude) when the membrane has the same charge as the protein bemg tested Before the present filtration membranes and methods of making and using them are descπbed, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular compositions of matter and processes descπbed, as such compositions and methods may, of course, vary It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of descπbing particular embodiments only, and is not mtended to be limiting smce the scope of the present mvention will be limited only by the appended claims DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS Definitions "Cellulose membrane" refers to a cellulose polymer on a microporous membrane, where the cellulose is repeating units of D-glucose The pnmary alcohol group of a glucose monomer provides the reactive species on the membrane to which the charged compound is covalently attached "CRC membrane" refers to a composite regenerated cellulose membrane prepared by castmg cellulose on a microporous substrate to control the average pore size and limit the number of defects m the cellulose sheet CRC membranes are preferred in the practice of the invention because they have greater mechanical strength than cellulose membranes while retammg the hydrophilicity and low foulmg charactenstics of cellulose useful in protem separations "Charged compound" refers to the compound linked to the filtration membrane, wherem the compound compπses a moiety having a positive or negative charge under the conditions used to separate a protein from a mixture of proteins According to the invention, the charged compound may further compπse a linker arm between the membrane and the charged moiety such that the charged compound projects from the surface of the membrane Where the charged compound projects from the surface of a pore into the lumen of the pore, the charged compound modifies the effective size of the pore and modifies the pore size distribution of the membrane "Reactive charged compound" refers to the charged compound pnor to linkage to the membrane, such that the reactive charged compound still retains the reactive moiety that promotes the membrane-reactive charged compound reaction For example, where the charged compound is a propyl tnmethyl ammonium ion covalently attached to a CRC membrane, the reactive charged compound may be bromopropyl tnmethyl ammonium bromide The covalent attachment mvolves nucleophilic displacement of the alkyl bromine by a pnmary alcohol of the cellulose matnx (see Fig. 2A, for example) "Linker arm" refers to the portion of the charged compound molecule between the portion that reacts or has reacted with a reactive group on the surface of a filtration membrane and the charged moiety Preferably, the linker arm is a cham of atoms or molecular subunits, which cham is inert to the reaction conditions used to covalently link the charged compound to the membrane, and is further inert to the aqueous conditions used dunng protein separation A linker arm may compπse, but is not limited to, an alkyl chain of from one to twenty carbon atoms, a carbohydrate cham of from one to fifteen sacchande moities (mcludmg, for example, πbose and deoxynbose), a dextran cham of from one to fifteen sacchande moities, an ammo acid chain of from one to twenty five ammo acids, and other polymers (such as those used to manufacture the membrane itself) of from one to twenty five repeat units Where a charged compound compπses an ammo acid chain as a linker arm and the charged moiety is the terminal ammo acid of the chain, the side cham of the terminal ammo acid is preferably a charged side chain "Sievmg" refers to the ratio of the concentration of a particular solute in the filtrate (downstream of the membrane) to the concentration of the same solute in the feed solution (upsteam of the membrane) (see Zeman and Zydney, supra, p 308) Generally a high sieving value suggests that the solute readily passes through the membrane, while a low sievmg value suggests that the solute is largely retamed by the membrane Where it is desired to retam a solute upstream of the membrane, a reduced sieving coefficient is preferred "Permeability" refers to the filtration rate divided by the net pressure drop across the membrane Permeability is therefore the inverse of membrane resistance Membrane permeability is pπmaπly determined by pore size distπbution, porosity (pore density), membrane thickness, and solvent viscosity Generally, as permeability increases, sievmg mcreases When sieving is improved due to the addition of a charged compound to the membrane, the sievmg improvement is an improvement relative to a membrane havmg substantially the same permeability (within 50%, preferably 30%, more preferably within 10% the same permeability) as the charged membrane, but lacking the charged compound Thus, where the improvement is a reduction m sieving because a charged solute, such as a protem, is retamed by a like-charged membrane, the sievmg is a reduction at comparable or substantially the same permeability Consequently, the rate of filtration is maintained, while the selectivity of the membrane is improved "Net charge " when refernng to a membrane or protein charge is meant a charge that is predominately positive or negative, but does not refer to a specific value for the number of positive charges versus the number of negative charges on the membrane or protein, unless otherwise noted Similarly, "like charge" and "same charge" refer to the situation in which a protein having a given charge, positive or negative, is related to a membrane or other protem havmg a given charge, either positive or negative "Protein mixture" refers to vaπous proteins of different sizes and net charges under given separation conditions of pH and ionic strength According to the separation method of the mvention, when the net charge of a protein of interest is known or is manipulated by alteration of pH conditions to have a net positive charge or net negative charge, the protem may be separated from differently charged or neutral proteins by passmg the protem mixture through a membrane of the invention havmg the same charge as the protein of interest (1 e , either a net positive charge or a net negative charge) For example, the invention contemplates a method of separating a desired protem from at least one protein of a mixture of proteins in an aqueous buffered solution, alteπng the pH of the solution such that the desired protem has a net charge and a protem to be separated from it is neutral or has a net charge that is opposite the net charge of the desired protein Next the protein mixture is contacted with a charged cellulose filtration membrane of the invention wherein the desired protein and the membrane have like net charges The desired protein is separated from the neutral protem and the oppositely charged protem by retaming the desired protem upstream of the membrane and filtermg the neutral or oppositely charged protein through the membrane This process is repeated until the desired protein is separated from a chosen number of protems of the mixture Alternatively, the mvention contemplates a method of separatmg a desired protein from at least one protem of a mixture of protems in an aqueous buffered solution by altering the pH of the solution such that the desired protem is neutral and the protein to be separated from it has a net charge that is the same as the charged membrane Next the protein mixture is contacted with the charged cellulose filtration membrane of the invention The desired protem is separated from the charged protem by retammg the charged protem upstream of the membrane and filtermg the desired protem through the membrane This process is repeated until the desired protein is separated from a chosen number of protems of the mixture "Pore size distribution" refers, basically, to the number of pores having an actual radius. R, near some theoretical radius, r, expressed as the probability density function (see, Zeman, L J and Zydney, A L , supra, p 299- 301 ) As the standard deviation of actual pore radπ increases, the pore size distπbution mcreases Narrowed pore size distπbution results from a reduction in the standard deviation of the pores from the theoretical value This is achieved, for example, when the sizes of some of the larger pores are reduced by addition of charged compound into the larger pores of a charged membrane Fig 3 diagrams such a pore size reduction The principle of liquid-liquid pore intrusion is useful for measuring pore size distnbution (see R van Reis and A L Zydney, supra, p 2201) According to this principle, two highly immiscible liquids, such as solutions of a sulfate salt and a poly(ethylene glycol) are contacted through mixing to reach equi bnum partitioning The membrane to be tested is pruned with one of the liquids so that all pores are filled After draining the feed channels, the second fluid is introduced into the system The first fluid is then displaced out of the pores by the second fluid, and the flow rate is measured as a function of trans-membrane pressure The resultmg data provide information on pore size distnbution and can be correlated with the nommal molecular weight cutoff (see R van Reis and A L Zydney, supra, p 2201 ). EXAMPLES The following examples are provided so as to provide those of ordinary skill m the art with a complete disclosure and descnption of how to make the compositions of the mvention and how to practice the methods of the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of what the mventor regards as his invention Efforts have been made to insure accuracy with respect to numbers used (e g amounts, temperature, etc ), but some experimental errors and deviation should be accounted for Unless indicated otherwise, temperature is m degrees C and chemical reactions were performed at atmosphenc pressure Example 1: Preparation of Charged Filtration Membranes For illustrative purposes, this example discloses charged CRC membranes and methods of making them It is understood that charge may be added to a membrane by chemistnes known to one of ordinary skill in the art such that the product membrane is charged and selectively retains a desired protein m the retentate, and passes uncharged or oppositely charged protems with the filtrate The product charged membrane has the charactenstic of a lower sieving coefficient for a given permeability relative to an uncharged membrane, or a higher permeability for a given sievmg coefficient CRC membranes are preferred due to their hydrophilicity as well as their mechanical stability to reverse pressure Stability under basic conditions allows for complete, rapid cleanmg and storage CRC membrane hydrophilicity minimizes protem fouling and simplifies membrane cleaning The membranes are preferably reacted with the reactive charged compound in an aqueous solution Aqueous reaction conditions are advantageous because flammable, organic compounds are avoided and the aqueous-soluble compounds are more readily and completely removed from a charged CRC membrane intended for use in pharmaceutical applications CRC membranes were obtained from Mil pore, Corp (Bedford MA The 300 kD MW membranes were designated PLCMK The 1000 kD MW membranes were designated PLCXK) The pnmary alcohol groups of the D-glucose moieties of cellulose are targeted for deπvatization because they can react without undermining the lntegnty of the cellulose matrix Pπmary alcohols (R-OH) react with alkyl halides (R'-X, where X is Br, for example) to produce ethers (R-O-R') In this example, a CRC membrane was reacted with 2 molar 3-bromopropyl tnmethyl ammonium bromide (as diagrammed in Fig 2A) in 0 1 N NaOH at room temperature overnight The reacted membranes were washed m distilled water and used for protein filtration or stored in 0 1 N NaOH at ambient temperature The membranes are stable at these conditions for at least six months The quaternary ammonium ion has a positive charge in aqueous solution from approximately pH 2 to pH 10, inclusive This pH range corresponds to the pH range in which most protems are structurally intact or recoverable to an active state, making a quaternary amme useful as the charged moiety of the charged compound Halides such as bromide, chloπde, and iodide are useful reactive moieties because they are good leaving groups for nucleophilic attack by the oxygen of the pπmary alcohol It is understood, however, that other anionic groups well known to those of ordinary skill in the art may be used to facilitate the reaction Reactmg the alkyl halide directly with the pnmary alcohol of the cellulose is advantageous because it is a one-step reaction This method also has the advantage of avoidmg the need to first denvatize the membrane with a strongly nucleophilic moiety that may not be fully reacted duπng subsequent steps or may require additional reactions to remove or deactivate the added nucleophile Another advantage of the method is that many alkyl halides are commercially available Thus, the method of preparing the charged membranes of the mvention is rapid and convenient, thereby saving time and cost Negatively charged membranes were generated usmg a similar method The reactive compound was 2 molar 3-bromopropane sulfomc acid m 0 1 N NaOH The reaction is diagrammed m Fig 2B, and the reaction conditions were as disclosed above for 3-bromopropyl tnmethyl ammonium bromide The sulfomc acid moiety remams negatively charged in a pH range useful for many protein separations To venfy that a positively or negatively charged CRC membrane was uniformly deπvatized. the membranes were stamed with a dye having a charge opposite that of the tested membrane CRC-O-propyl tnmethvl ammonium bromide membranes were rinsed extensively in distilled water and dipped in aqueous ponceau red solution The negatively charged dye uniformly stained the positively charged membrane, but did not stain a control membrane that had been exposed to 0 1 N NaOH without the 3-bromopropyl tnmethyl ammonium bromide Similarly. CRC-O- propane sulfomc acid membranes were extensively nnsed in distilled water and dipped in aqueous methylene blue solution The positively charged dye stained the negatively charged membrane, but did not stain the control membrane that had been exposed to 0 1 N NaOH m the absence of 3-bromopropane sulfomc acid Thus, the membranes were uniformly and extensively deπvatized by the alkyl halides m this example Example 2: Membrane Pore Size Distribution is Modified Membrane pores are infiltrated by reactive charged compounds when steric factors, such as size and linker arm length, and electrostatic factors such as charge repulsion, allow it Thus, according to the mvention, membrane pores large enough to allow infiltration of a given reactive charged compound are deπvatized by the charged compound such that the size of the pore lumen is reduced Fig 3 shows a diagram of a membrane pore havmg propyl tnmethyl ammonium ions covalently attached to the wall of the pore and projectmg mto the lumen The length of the linker arm controls the degree to which the charged compound projects into the lumen and reduces its effective diameter The charge generates a positively charged region from which a similarly charged protein will be excluded Thus, a desired protein having an overall charge that is the same as that of the denvatized membrane is repelled by the surface of the membrane as well as by the pores of the membrane, thereby improvmg retention of the desired protein Neutral protems will tend to pass through the charged membrane pores with the filtrate, bemg neither attracted to nor repelled from the surface or pores of the membrane Example 3 Methods of Using a Charged CRC Membrane to Separate Proteins Usmg conventional membranes, permeability is sacnficed for improved sieving, or sieving is sacπficed for improved permeability In general, as permeability of a membrane increases, the sievmg coefficient increases This reflects the fact that more of the protem to be retamed passes through a highly permeable membrane, making the filtration process faster, but less selective (high sievmg coefficient), resultmg m lower yield of desired protem and less complete separation Fig 4 is a graph demonstrating that commercial ultrafiltration (UF) membranes sacπficed sievmg for improved permeabililty The UF membranes of Fig 4 were tested us g a standardized mixed dextran test (see, for example, Zeman and Zydney, supra, p 183-88) The tested membranes were from Pall Filtron (Cellulose, Omega™ (polysulfone with hydrophihc modification), Alpha™ (polyethersulfone modified to lower fouling), and Nova™ (polyethersulfone)) and Milhpore (Regenerated Cellulose (RC), Biomax™ with screen A, Biomax™ with screen B and PES (polyethersulfone)) The charged membranes of the invention decrease the sieving coefficient for a given permeability when compared to an uncharged membrane By charge-modifying an uncharged membrane, the problem of sacnfϊcing sieving for permeability (or vice versa) is solved The membranes of the invention have dramatically unproved sievmg for a given permeability when compared to the uncharged control membrane Fig 5 shows the relationship between filtrate flux (mL/min, x axis) and sievmg (y axis) for uncharged and charged membranes havmg 300 kD or 1000 kD MW cutoffs As flux, a factor that is proportional to membrane permeability (see, Zeman and Zydney, supra, p 16), mcreases, sievmg mcreases Unlike m conventional membranes, however, when charge is added, the sievmg coefficient decreases for a given flux value At a relatively high flux of 8 mL/min (see "a" on Fig 5), a 1000 kD CRC charged membrane (CRC 1000+) or a 300 kD CRC charged membrane (CRC 300+) has an approximately 10 fold lower sievmg coefficient than the uncharged control membrane At a lower flux of 5 mL/min (see "b" on Fig 5), the sievmg coefficient is reduced approximately 100 fold for both the 1000 kD and the 300 kD CRC charged membranes In this example, the charged compound added onto the surface and pores of the CRC membrane was propyl tnmethyl ammonium ion The membranes were prepared as disclosed m Example 1 The protem was rhuMAb HER2 under conditions that rendered it positively charged like the CRC+ membrane The sieving coefficient was calculated using the rhuMAb HER2 concentration (ng/mL) in the feed solution (known) divided by the rhuMAb HER2 concentration in the filtrate (determined by ELISA) The data at point "b" of Fig 5 were recalculated and plotted to show the relationship between permeability and sievmg m Fig 6 These data also show that for a given permeability, the sievmg is reduced 100 fold for both 300 kD and 1000 kD MW cutoff CRC membranes when charge is added Thus, an optimum permeability may be chosen to allow rapid separation, while greatly improving (rather than harming) the sieving coefficient for the membrane and allowing improved separation and yield of the desired protein These dramatic and unexpected improvements in membrane properties result from the addition of charged compounds to the surface and pores of the membrane Separation of a mixture of proteins according to the mvention A mixture of proteins, each having a different pi were separated using the charged membranes of the invention In a first example, two proteins were separated RhuMAb HER2, the desired protem, has pi 8 9 Bovme serum albumm (BSA), an impuπty, has pi 4 8 The protems were mixed in a pH 4 5 buffer causmg rhuMAb HER2 to be positively charged, and BSA to be neutral A positively charged membrane of the invention, such as a CRC-O-propyl tnmethyl ammonium membrane was used for the separation. The protems and buffer were contacted with the positively charged membrane Of the two proteins, only BSA passed through the membrane into the filtrate because it was not repelled by the positive surface or pores of the membrane. The desired protem, rhuMAb HER2 was retamed upstream of the positively charged membrane A related strategy is useful for retaining a protein, such as BSA in this example, which has pi 4 8, while the desired product protein, for example, Fab (e g anti-VEGF Fab), having a pi of 8.1, is allowed to pass through a membrane to effect separation of the two similarly sized protems. m this example 68 kD and 45 kD, respectively. The separation is performed using a pH 8 buffer, thereby causmg Fab to be neutral. The BSA and Fab protein mixture m pH 8 buffer is contacted with a CRC-O-propane sulfomc acid membrane of the invention (negatively charged at pH 8) to allow the higher pi protein (Fab, pi 8 1) to pass through the membrane into the filtrate and retain the lower pi, negatively charged protem (BSA, pi 4 8) upstream of the negatively charged membrane A pH gradient may be prefened over the step-wise pH change described above, although a similar strategy for selective protem retention and removal is followed. The foregomg wntten specification is considered sufficient to enable one skilled m the art to practice the invention. The present invention is not to be limited m scope by the examples provided, since the examples are illustrative of certain aspects of the invention and any compositions or methods that are functionally equivalent are within the scope of this invention. Indeed, vanous modifications of the invention m addition to those shown and descnbed herem will become apparent to those skilled m the art from the foregoing descnption and fall within the scope of the appended claims What is claimed is:

Claims: CLAIMS 1 A filtration membrane compπsmg a covalently attached charged compound, wherem membrane sieving for a solute is improved by at least 1 5 fold relative to the same membrane lackmg the charged compound, wherem membrane permeability is substantially the same for the membrane lackmg the charged compound, and wherem the filtration membrane comprises a cellulose polymer 2 The filtration membrane of claim 1 , wherem membrane pore size distnbution is reduced relative to the membrane lacking the charged compound 3 The filtration membrane of claim 1 , the compound compnsing a linker arm 4 The filtration membrane of claim 3, wherem the linker arm compnses a heteroatom selected from the group consistmg essentially of N, O, S, and P 5 The filtration membrane of claim 3, wherem the linker arm is selected from the group consistmg essentially of an alkyl chain of from 1 to 20 carbon atoms, a branched alkyl cham of from 1 to 20 carbon atoms, a ring structure, a carbohydrate, a sacchande, a dextran, and an ammo acid 6 The filtration membrane of claim 1 , wherem the charge is positive 7 The filtration membrane of claim 6, wherem the compound compnses a charged moiety selected from the group consistmg essentially of an amme and a quaternary ammonium ion 8 The filtration membrane of claim 1, wherem the charge is negative 9 The filtration membrane of claim 1, wherem the compound compnses a charged moiety selected from the group consistmg essentially of an acid, a sulfomc acid, and a carboxy c acid 10 The filtration membrane of claim 1, wherem the membrane is selected from the group consistmg essentially of cellulose, composite regenerated cellulose (CRC), cellulose diacetate and tπacetate, cellulose mtrate, and cellulose diacetate/cellulose nitrate blends 11 The filtration membrane of claim 10, wherein the covalently attached charged compound is attached by an ether linkage 12 A method of preparing a charged filtration membrane of claim 1 the method compπsmg contactmg the membrane with a reactive charged compound and reacting surface reactive groups on the membrane with a reactive group of the charged compound such that the charged compound is covalently attached to the membrane 13 A method of preparing a charged filtration membrane of claim 1 , the method compnsmg contactmg the membrane with a first compound compnsmg a reactive group, reactmg surface reactive groups on the membrane with the reactive group of the first compound such that the first compound is covalently attached to the membrane, reactmg the attached first compound with a second compound, the second compound compnsmg a charged group, such that the charged group is covalently attached to the first compound 14 A method of separating a desired protein from at least one protem of a mixture of protems m an aqueous buffered solution, the method compnsing altering the pH of the solution such that the desired protem has a net charge and a protem to be separated from it is neutral or has a net charge that is opposite the net charge of the desired protem, contactmg the protem mixture with the charged filtration membrane of claim 1 , wherein the desired protem and the membrane have like net charges, separatmg the desired protein from the neutral protem and the oppositely charged protein by retammg the desired protem upstream of the membrane and filtermg the neutral or oppositely charged protein through the membrane, repeating the altenng, contacting, and separatmg steps until the desired protem is separated from a chosen number of protems of the mixture 15 A method of separatmg a desired protem from at least one protem of a mixture of protems m an aqueous buffered solution, the method compnsmg altenng the pH of the solution such that the desired protein is neutral and a protein to be separated from it has a net charge that is the same as the net charge of the filtration membrane, contactmg the protem mixture with the charged filtration membrane of claim 1 , separatmg the desired protein from the charged protein by retammg the charged protem upstream of the membrane and filtenng the desu-ed protein through the membrane, repeatmg the altenng, contacting, and separating steps until the desired protem is separated from a chosen number of protems of the mixture

Inventors: VAN REIS ROBERT D, VAN REIS, ROBERT, D.
Applicants: GENENTECH INC, GENENTECH, INC.
Application year: 2000
Main classification: B01D67
IPC codes: B01D61, B01D67, B01D69, B01D71, C07K1