MULTIPLE ACCESS SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTIBEAM DIGITAL RADIO SYSTEMS

Abstract: A multiple-access digital radio communication system and method with communication links between user terminal transmitters and central node with a receiver system including a multibeam antenna. User terminal transmitters assigned to one beam coverage region use mltiple access channels that are mutually orthogonal for transmitting digital message information. These multiple access channels are reused in adjacent and other beam coverage regions. Error-correction coding (20), interleaving (21), and a single-axis modulator (24) are used in the user transmitter to increase resistance to potential interference from user terminal transmitters in other coverage regions. At the receiver, an adaptive processor (28) such as an equalizer or sequence estimator is used to combine multiple antenna beam signals (27) to produce a combined signal associated with each user. Deinterleaving (30) and error-correction decoding (31) of the combined signal is used to complete the recovery of the digital message information.

Description: MULTIPLE ACCESS SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTIBEAM DIGITAL RADIO SYSTEMS FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates generally to multiple access communication in a digital radio system, and more particularly to improvements in the multiple access communication of fixed remote user terminals and/or mobile user terminals with a central node having a multibeam antenna and associated receiver. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Multiple access radio systems provide communication services for fixed remote user terminals and/ or mobile user terminals. Examples of multiple access radio systems include land mobile radio networks, cellular mobile radio networks, and wideband radio networks between fixed subscribers and one or more central nodes, which may use a multibeam antenna for increasing system capacity and improving communications quality. The reverse link or uplink in a multiple access radio system is a communications link between a fixed remote or mobile user terminal and a central node, which can be located at either a fixed location on the Earth in a terrestrial radio system or as part of an orbiting satellite in a satellite radio system. Digital radio systems transmit and receive digital message information, e.g., computer or Internet data. Alternatively, digital radio systems accept analog message information, e.g., voice or video data, and convert this analog information to a digital format during transmission and reception. Accordingly, a fixed remote or mobile user terminal transmits message information in a digital format using an uplink to a central node, where a multibeam antenna and associated receiver process received signals to extract user message information. In some satellite radio systems, the receiver processing is divided between a satellite repeater and a ground-based station processor. User terminals within the same beam coverage region generally avoid mutual interference through the use of some form of multiple access scheme Conventional multiple access radio services use Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA), Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), or some combination thereof Generally, FDMA separates users into different frequency subbands, TDMA separates users into different time intervals or slots, and, CDMA separates users by assigning different signature waveforms or spreading codes to each user These CDMA spreading codes can be either orthogonal, i.e., there is no mterference between synchronized users, or quasi-orthogonal, i e , there is some small interference between users FDMA and TDMA are orthogonal multiple access (OMA) schemes because with ideal frequency filters and synchronization there is no mutual mterference Another example of an OMA system is CDMA with orthogonal spreading codes Quasi- Orthogonal Multiple Access (QOMA) systems include CDMA with quasi- orthogonal spreadmg codes and FDMA/TDMA with randomized frequency hopping In both orthogonal and quasi-orthogonal multiple access systems, the multiple access channels are usually assigned by a centralized controller which may make assignments for a single central node beam coverage region or the assignments may cover the beam coverage regions of multiple central nodes The assignments to the user terminals are normally transmitted in time division with downlink message information After synchronization, user terminals can extract the channel assignment data from the downlink messages For an isolated beam, an OMA scheme generally provides a larger system capacity than a QOMA scheme However, when other beams are taken into account, practical systems often use QOMA schemes for reducmg mterference between users to acceptable levels Interference between a user on one beam and users on other beams is normally reduced b user/beam cross-channel attenuation However, in OMA radio systems, such cross-channel attenuation usually does not reduce interference enough to allow the reuse of the same orthogonal waveform or channel in adjacent beams. Instead, channel management is typically required for determining when a multiple access channel can be reused in another beam depending on an allowable threshold of the user/beam cross-channel attenuation. This leads to a reuse factor that is less than 1. The reuse factor of a multiple access channel is defined as the number of user terminal assignments in different beam coverage regions divided by the total number of beam coverage regions. Because the capacity of a multiple access system is proportional to the average value of the reuse factor with respect to all the multiple access channels, it is desirable to make the reuse factor for each multiple access channel as large as possible subject to interference constraints. Practical limitations on multibeam antennas typically cause the reuse factor in cellular OMA systems to vary between 1/3 and 1/ 12. In contrast, in a QOMA radio system, e.g., the uplink of a CDMA radio system in the IS-95 standard, the reuse factor can be unity because the combination of user/beam cross-channel attenuation and spreading code interference protection is sufficient to keep mutual interference between users in different beams to adequately small levels. However, one drawback is that a QOMA radio system generally has a theoretical capacity that is less than that of an OMA radio system. Conventional multiple access digital radio systems provide means for error-correction coding/ decoding of message information, means for interleaving/ deinterleaving the message information, and a transmission format for the message information that includes reference signal sub-blocks. The reference signal is generated at both the user terminal and the central node and used by the central node receiver for obtaining channel parameters to aid in demodulating a user signal. The insertion of a known reference signal in time multiplex with the transmitted message information is described in "An Adaptive Receiver for Digital Signaling through Channels with Intersymbol Interference", J.G. Proakis and J.H. Miller, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. IT- 15, No. A, July 1969 and in U.S. Patent 4,365,338. Error- correction coding adds redundancy to message information in a prescribed manner so that transmission errors may be corrected with a decoder at the receiver. The purpose of the interleaver/deinterleaver is to randomize these transmission errors at the decoder input so as to make the decoder more capable of correcting them. Further, the message information conventionally undergoes quadrature transmission, wherein two carriers in phase quadrature to one another, e.g., cos ω c t and sin ω c t, are simultaneously transmitted using the same channel. Quadrature transmission is an example of a multisymbol signaling scheme, wherein pluralities of successive binary digits of user data are combined to form symbols to be transmitted. Such multisymbol signaling schemes are typically used to reduce the bandwidth required to transmit the user data. Quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) is an example of a general multisymbol signaling scheme, wherein multilevel amplitude modulation is applied separately on each of the two quadrature carriers. Some conventional digital radio systems use adaptive equalizers for combining multipath signals and reducing intersymbol interference. Adaptive equalizers have also been proposed for use with a multibeam receiver for reducing interference from other users. MMSE Equalization of Interference on Fading Diversity Channels, Peter Monsen, IEEE Conference on Communications, Conference Record, Vol. 1 , Denver, CO, June 1981 , pp. 12.2- 1- 12.2-5, describes an adaptive equalizer that combines multipath signals and reduces intersymbol and other user interference. The total interference is included in an error signal whose mean square value is minimized. Transmission of a time division multiplexed reference that is known at the receiver is also described. US Patent Nos 4, 1 12,370 and 4,644,562 disclose the cancellation of interference in multibeam antennas as a generalization of the cancellation of interference in dual-polarized antennas US Patent No 5,680,419 discloses adaptive sequence estimauon techniques that can be used with a multibeam antenna for canceling interference Adaptive Equalization and Interference Cancellation for Wireless Communication Systems, B C.W. Lo and K.B. Letaief, IEEE Trans Comm , vol 47, no 4, April 1999, pp 538-545 discloses in a multiantenna application a maximum likelihood sequence estimauon technique that uses a reference signal of the desired user in order to detect a user signal in the presence of intersymbol interference and other user interference. Although either an equalizer or a sequence estimator or a combination of both can be used for adaptive processing, the equalizer is generally preferred because it is not as complex as the sequence estimator. Other relevant patent documents and publications include US Patent No. 5,838,742, Dynamic Channel Assignment in High-Capacity Mobile Communications Systems, D C. Cox and D O. Reudick, Bell System Tech. Journal, vol 51 , pp 1833-2857, July-Aug. 1971 ; MMSE Equalization on Fading Diversity Channels, P Monsen, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. COM-32, No 1, pp 5- 12, Jan. 1984, Linear Multiuser Detectors for Synchronous Code-Division Multiple Access Channels, R. Lupas and S. Verdu, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. IT-35, No. l, pp.123- 136, Jan. 1989, Decorrelating Decision-Feedback Multiuser Detector for Synchronous Code- Division Multiple Access Channels, A Duel-Hallen, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol COM-41 , No 2, pp.285-290, Feb. 1993, A Family of Multiuser Decision Feedback Detectors for Asynchronous Code-Division Multiple Access Channels, A. Duel-Hallen, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol.COM-43, Nos 2,3,4, Feb-Apnl 1995, Information-Theoretic Considerations for Symmetric, Cellular, Multiple Access Fading Channels-Part I, S Shamai and A D Wyner, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol 43, No 6, pp 1877- 1894, Nov. 1997; and, Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility Standard for Dual-Mode Wideband Spread Spectrum Cellular System, EIA/TIA IS-95, 1992. Although the techniques described above have been used for improving communications quality and increasing the capacity of multiple access communication systems, it has been recognized that the capacity of OMA systems is limited because its multiple access channels have reuse factors less than 1. It has also been recognized that the capacity of QOMA systems is limited because its theoretical capacity is less than that of a corresponding OMA system. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION With the foregoing background m mmd, it is an object of the invenUon to provide a multiple access communication system and method with increased channel capacity and improved communications quality Another object of the invention is to provide a multiple access communication system and method that is orthogonal m each beam coverage region and has a channel capacity greater than that of conventional quasi- orthogonal multiple access communication systems Still another object of the invention is to provide an orthogonal multiple access communicaUon system and method that has a reuse factor of unity The foregoing and other objects are achieved m a mulUple access communication system including a plurality of user terminals, each including a user terminal transmitter, and a central node including a multibeam antenna and associated receiver for receiving digital message information Uansrmtted by the user terminal transmitters The receiver includes a multibeam antenna that receives mulUple access signals from the user terminal transmitters The multibeam antenna produces beam coverage regions in which user terminals are located User terminal transmitters are associated with a beam coverage region, and those user terminal transmitters associated with a beam coverage region employ mutually orthogonal mulUple access waveforms User transmitter terminals associated with other beam coverage regions can reuse the same orthogonal waveforms from the mutually orthogonal waveform set In a preferred embodiment, the user terminal transmitter includes a coding unit for providing error-correcUon coding of the digital message information, an interleaving unit for distributing the error-correcUon coded message information, a multiplexer for multiplexing user reference signals with the error-correction coded message informaUon, and a modulator for modulating the multiplexed signal to a single radio frequency axis for subsequent Uansmission as a respective multiple access signal, wherein each of the respective multiple access signals associated with a beam coverage region employ an orthogonal waveform from a mutually orthogonal waveform set The modulator may also apply a random phase shift to a group or packet of multiplexed data containing at least one reference signal subblock In some systems the random phase shift can be omitted because user terminal motion provides a similar effect In this preferred embodiment at the central node, a receiver includes a multibeam antenna for receiving respective multiple access signals from the user terminal Uansmitters, an adaptive processor for each user that processes the received beam signals and the reference signals to combine the received beam signals and reduce other user interference, and a deinterleaver and decoder for each user to recover the digital message information from the combined signal Random phase modulation and channel variations randomize the received packet phase, which improves the deinterleaving/ decoding operation The error-correction coded information is interleaved before Uansmission so that after deinterleaving at the receiver, the phase modulation of successive error-correction coded symbols is different The interleaving thus improves the error-correcting capability of the decoder and increases the interference protection In general every user may employ a unique reference signal so that the receiver can extract channel information for that user by generating a replica of the unique reference signal and processing it with the received antenna beam signals Since users within the same beam coverage region are assigned channels from a mutually orthogonal set, these users may employ the same reference signal At the receiver there is an adaptive processor for each user and this adaptive subsystem processes the antenna beam signals that contain significant adjacent beam interference In the preferred embodiment the adaptive processor is a multibeam equalizer that minimizes a mean square error by means of an estimated gradient algorithm The error contains all the channel effects including additive noise, other user interference, and multipath reflection effects In this preferred embodiment only the user reference signal for the desired user is required in the estimated gradient algorithm In an alternative embodiment the adaptive processor solves a set of simultaneous equations for each received data group. The solution of these equations provides the processor settings for that received group. The user reference signal for a respective beam coverage region and user reference signals corresponding to interfering beams are employed to determine the adaptive processor parameter settings in this alternative embodiment. Still further objects and advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the ensuing description and drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The invention will be better understood by reference to the following more detailed description and accompanying drawings in which FIG 1 is a diagram of a packet for Uansmission in the communication system of the present invention; FIG 2 is a diagram of beam coverage regions containing user terminal Uansmitters that transmit information to a receiver in the present invention FIG 3 is a functional block diagram of a central node connected to an assignment controller in the present invention FIG 4 is a functional block diagram of a user terminal Uansmitter m the communication system of the present invention, and FIG 5 is a functional block diagram of a receiver at a central node in the present invention DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION FIG. 1 shows the transmission format for a packet 10 of user message information to be sent over a reverse link or an uplink in a multiple access radio system between a fixed remote user terminal or a mobile user terminal and a central node, which may be located at either a fixed location on the Earth in a terrestrial radio system or as part of an orbiting satellite in a satellite radio system. The packet 10 includes a user reference signal that is a block of reference data 11, which is inserted into the packet 10 at the user terminal. In particular, the reference data 11 includes a sequence of known data symbols (not shown) that may be inserted into the packet 10 either as a contiguous block as depicted in FIG. 1 or in some distributed manner. The sequence of data symbols and the manner in which they are inserted into the packet 10 are known at the central node for each user in the multiple access radio system whose message information is to be processed at that node. Further, the reference data 11 is used for determining adaptive processor parameter settings at the central node, as described in further detail below. The packet 10 also includes interleaved and coded data 12, which is representative of processed user message information in digital form. Finally, the packet 10 may include other system or user information (not shown) in addition to the reference data 11 and the interleaved and coded data 12. As shown in FIG. 2 the multiple access radio system according to the present invention includes user terminal transmitters 13 that are included in user terminals and that have associated digital radio communication links, i.e., reverse links or uplinks, to a receiver 14 at the cenUal node. The receiver 14 includes a multibeam antenna that produces beam coverage regions 15 that are numbered 1-7 in this example. Further, user terminal transmitters 13 are associated with beam coverage regions 15. The beam coverage regions typically overlap because antenna beams do not have ideal cutoff transitions. A user terminal transmitter 13 is usually assigned to a user terminal beam coverage region 15 depending on geographic location and antenna beam response characteristics Typical user/beam cross-channel interference between uplink transmissions as a result of overlap of the antenna beam patterns occurs in adjacent beam coverage regions This adjacent beam interference is illustrated in FIG 2 by dark arrows between the beam coverage region pairs 1-2, 1-3, 1-7, 2-3, 2-4, 2-5, 2-6, 2-7, 3-4, 4-5, 5-6, and 6-7 User terminal transmitters 13 associated with the same beam coverage region 15 are assigned orthogonal multiple access (OMA) channels from a mutually orthogonal set Examples of OMA schemes that may be used with the multiple access radio system of the present invention include Frequency- Division Multiple Access (FDMA), Time-Division Multiple Access (TDMA), and Orthogonal-Waveform Code-Division Multiple Access (OCDMA), and various combinations thereof In the present invention the same multiple access channel may be reassigned in all other beam coverage regions for a reuse factor of unity The assignment of channels to the user terminal transmitter 13 can be accomplished by Uansmittrng assignment data to the user terminal from either the central node or a centralized location that includes multiple central nodes Assignment data may be time division multiplexed with downlink message Uansfers or transmitted on a separate channel to the user terminal With reference to FIG 3, in the preferred embodiment the multiple access channel assignments are produced by an assignment controller 16 that is either collocated with the central node 17 or is connected to the cential node 17 with a communication link (indicated as a double-arrow line in FIG 3) to Uansfer assignment data to an assignment processor 18 The assignment processor 18 formats assignment data for downlink Uansfer to user terminals via a cenUal node Uansmitter 19 and it receives status information from the receiver 14 to be described subsequently that recovers uplink message information This status information is passed on to the assignment conUoller 16 by the assignment processor 18 Each user terminal transmitter 13 associated with a particular beam coverage region is assigned a multiple access channels from a mutually orthogonal set Thus user terminal transmitters 13A and 13B associated with the same beam coverage region do not interfere with each other under ideal transmission conditions The user terminals 13 and 13A (or 13 and 13B) shown m beam coverage regions numbered 1 and 7, respectively, may be assigned the same multiple access channel by the assignment conUoller 16 and thus would interfere with each other under ideal transmission conditions For nonideal transmission conditions such as multipath reflections there can be both mtrabeam and mterbeam interference which must be compensated for by an adaptive processor m the receiver 14 Because of adjacent beam interference the mterbeam interference is typically more severe m multipath environments of an OMA system because there is no orthogonal channel protection Before describing in detail a user terminal transmitter 13 and a receiver 14 in accordance with the present invention, it should be understood that the present invention includes conventional communication system components, e g , error-correction coder/ decoder, mterleaver/ deinterleaver, multiplexer/ demultiplexer, modulator/ demodulator, and adaptive processor, which perform tasks related to the transmission and/or reception of user message information Because these communication system components are conventional and known to those skilled in this art, the user terminal Uansmitter 13 and the receiver 14 have been described through the use of functional block diagrams, wherein each block is representative of one of these conventional communication system components For the adaptive processor, a preferred and alternative construction is identified below FIG 4 shows a preferred embodiment of a user terminal Uansmitter 13 according to the present invention User message information to be Uansmitted on an uplmk to a receiver 14 may initially be in either analog or digital form However, the user message information is preferably converted, if necessary, into digital form before being provided as a digital input to a coder 20, which adds redundancy m the form of an error-correction code, thereby causing the digital Uansmission rate of coded data at the output of the coder 20 to be greater than the digital input rate at the input of the coder 20 It should be noted that the type, the subclass, and the parameters related to the error- correction code are not critical to the present invention In a binary communication system an example of an error-correction coding technique would be the rate 1 /2, constraint length 7, convolutional code with generators 133, 171 The coder 20 provides the coded data to an mterleaver 21, which distributes the coded data among mulUple packets in a predetermined manner In a preferred embodiment, the coded data is distributed among the multiple packets as follows If there are N symbols per packet, then the N symbols are evenly distributed over N packets, e g , symbol 1 goes in packet 1 , symbol 2 goes in packet 2, and so on, until symbol N goes in packet N, and then the process is repeated until all N packets are full However, it should be understood that the mterleaver 21 may distribute the coded data into the multiple packets m other ways and still achieve a reuse factor of 1 in the uplink of the OMA system A reference generator 22A locally produces the sequence of known data symbols included in the reference data 11 mentioned above, and then provides the reference data 11 to a packet multiplexer 23 The block of reference data 11 that is inserted into packet 10 can be unique to each user or it may be the same for each user m a beam coverage region 15 but unique relative to users in other beam coverage regions 15 m the multiple access radio system Similarly, the mterleaver 21 provides the interleaved and coded data 12 to the packet multiplexer 23, which then generates packets having the general form shown m FIG 1 As also mentioned above, each packet may include other system or user information in addition to the reference data 11 provided by the reference generator 22A and the interleaved and coded data 12 provided by the mterleaver 21 Next, the packet multiplexer 23 sequentially provides the generated packets to a single-axis modulator 24, which converts the packetized data to a multiple access signal suitable for Uansmission over an uplmk to a receiver 14 using a radio frequency (RF) channel In particular, the packets generated by the packet multiplexer 23 are converted by the single-axis modulator 24 to use only one of two quadrature carriers, e g , cos ω c t or sin ω c t For example, the single-axis modulator 24 may use, e g , pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) for applying multilevel amplitude modulation of the user data on one of the two quadrature earners Although the use of PAM in the smgle-axis modulator 24 reduces the number of possible bits per transmitted symbol by a factor of two when compared with a modulator using quadrature transmission, e g , QAM, the theoretical system capacity m this multibeam application is expected to increase because the smgle-axis modulator 24 is expected to make the user terminal Uansmitted signal more resistant to interference when adaptive interference reduction is accomplished at the receiver 14 This mcreased resistance to interference is also largely responsible for the reuse of multiple access channels in adjacent beam coverage regions Further, the single axis modulator 24 preferably applies a pseudo- random phase shift to each generated packet This applied phase shift is fixed, l e , constant, for the duration of the packet 10 In multiple access radio systems with mobile user terminals the application of a variable phase modulation may be unnecessary because user motion may produce the desired phase shift Finally, the single axis modulator 24 provides the multiple access signal to an antenna 25 for transmission over an uplink to a receiver 14 using an RF channel FIG 5 shows a preferred embodiment of a receiver 14 according to the present invention The receiver 14 includes a multibeam antenna 26, which receives the multiple access signals produced by the single axis modulator 24 m each user terminal transmitter and transmitted over the RF channel The multibeam antenna 26 receives multiple access signals on a plurality of beams, each beam including a set of users assigned to respective OMA channels The same orthogonal channel may be reused in different beams because of the increased interference protection provided by the combination of error- correction coding/ decoding, interleaving/ deinterleaving, smgle-axis demodulation and adaptive processor combining so that a reuse factor of unity is achieved The output of the multibeam antenna 26 is a set of multibeam antenna signals If the multibeam antenna has B beams and B antenna beam signals, then for a particular user there are M antenna beam signals that contain users with significant interference, wherein M < B The choice of M is dependent upon the required communications quality and the required complexity of the receiver 14 Accordingly, the multibeam antenna 26 provides the B antenna beam signals to B RF demodulators 27 For the particular user mentioned above, a subset of the RF demodulators 27 provide M demodulated signals to an M-drmensional adaptive processor 28 for beam combining and other user interference reduction In a preferred embodiment, the subset of the RF demodulators 27 converts the antenna beam signals provided by the multibeam antenna 26 from the RF channel to digital form at baseband for subsequent processing by the adaptive processor 28 The adaptive processor 28 processes multiple demodulated signals and possibly previously detected digital symbols from the particular user and the other users, thereby generating a combined signal with reduced mterference from the other users The adaptive processor 28 may take the form of an adaptive equalizer that minimizes some error criterion, or an adaptive sequence estimator that finds the most likely transmitted digital symbol sequence for the particular user, or some combination of both Examples of adaptive equalizers that might be used in this multibeam application include linear minimum mean square error (MMSE) receivers, decorrelation detectors, and decision-feedback detectors The preferred embodiment of an adaptive equalizer is described in "MMSE Equalization of Interference on Fading Diversity Channels", P Monsen, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol 32, no 1 , January 1984 [hereafter denoted by MMSE Equalization], the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference An example of adaptive sequence estimation m this multibeam application is descπbed in Adaptive Equalization and Interference Cancellation for Wireless Communication Systems, B C W Lo and K B Letaief, IEEE Trans Comm , vol 47, no 4, April 1999, pp 538-545, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference In the preferred embodiment the adaptive processor 28 is adapted by using a replica of the reference data for a particular user To this end, the reference generator 22B provides a user-identifying replica of the reference signal for a particular user, e g , reference data 11, to the adaptive processor 28 The adaptive processor 28 exploits the user-identifying rephca to adapt its parameters and then generates a combined signal that corresponds to a particular user from the M antenna beam signals The combining in the preferred embodiment is accomplished by using the MMSE equalizer described m MMSE Equalization, above The adaptation of this equalizer to minimize a mean square error containing noise and interference is accomplished with the user-identifying replica that is known to the receiver 14 As descπbed in MMSE Equalization, this adaptation takes place when the reference signal is present in the received signal corresponding to a desired user The error signal is derived from the difference between the combined signal and the user-identifying replica The adaptation of the MMSE equalizer descπbed in MMSE Equalization is accomplished m the preferred embodiment with the Least-Mean-Squares (LMS) algoπthm The LMS algoπthm is a well known estimated-gradient algoπthm that has been applied m many equalizer applications This algonthm is applied to the adaptation of a linear equalizer m "An Adaptive Receiver for Digital Signaling through Channels with Intersymbol Interference", J G Proakis and J H Miller, IEEE Trans on Information Theory, vol IT- 15, No 4, July 1969 and is applied to the adaptation of a decision-feedback equalizer in " Feedback Equalization for Fading Dispersive Channels", P Monsen, IEEE Trans On Information Theory, vol IT- 17, pp.55-64, January 1971. In this LMS algorithm with application to the MMSE equalizer of MMSE Equalization, the error signal, referenced above, is multiplied by each of the M antenna beam signals and each equalizer weight is updated by a fraction of the multiplication product corresponding to its antenna beam signal. The LMS algorithm is an estimated gradient algorithm in that it searches for the optimum mean-square error solution by making steps in a multidimension space that correspond to the negative of the estimated gradient. The combined signal is then produced by multiplying the equalizer weights and antenna beam signals and adding up the M products. Interference and noise are both reduced because the mean square value of the error signal has been minimized. This equalizer can be extended to include multipath dispersion and cancellation of previous user decisions as described in MMSE Equalization. In an alternative embodiment, the combining is accomplished by using not only the replica of the reference signal of the desired user but replicas of reference signals for interfering users as well. For the desired user and each potential user interferer in M- 1 other beams coverage regions, the adaptive processor 28 performs M 2 correlations of the user-identifying replicas from a plurality of reference generators 22B and antenna beam signals from RF demodulators 23 to obtain user/beam cross-channel values Au , for user J transmitting to beam I. The values Au are in general complex. As an example of possible user/beam cross-channel interference consider FIG.2 which shows a group of beam coverage regions 15 which contain user terminal Uansmitters 13 that send message information to the receiver 14. The receiver 14, as described above with reference to FIG.5, contains, for example, a seven beam antenna that produces the beam coverage regions 15 or cells numbered 1-7. Interference between user terminal signals is most pronounced between users in adjacent cells. Since the users in each cell are assigned multiple access channels from a mutually orthogonal set, the first order interference in the absence of multipath distortion is only from users with the same multiple access channel but located in an adjacent cell. Analysis of this type of configuration has shown that the worst interference situation occurs for a user in a ring cell, i.e., 1,3-7, rather than the center cell 2. If, for example, the receiver 14 is trying to recover the message information for a user in cell 1 then the minimum user/ beam cross channel values of interest (cells 2, 3, and 7 being adjacent to cell 1) are An, Ai2, A_ι, Ai3 ,A3i ,Ai7, A71, which corresponds to M=4 in a B=7 beam system. Better interference cancellation is obtained by increasing the value M < B. For M=7 in this example the user/beam cross channel values Au for I,J= 1 ,...7 must be computed. The additional cross channel values in the M=7 calculation increases the opportunity to cancel interference affecting the user in cell 1. For a user in the center cell (cell 2, as shown in FIG.2), the minimum nonzero user/beam cross channel values are A 2 j and Aj 2 , J= 1 ,3-7, i.e. M=6. There is more interference in the center cell user example but theoretical capacity calculations show that this interference is exploited in the invention to realize improved capacity relative to the ring cell example. A solution for the optimum combining weights can be expressed in terms of the complex user/beam cross channel matrix A = { Au , I, J = 1,2,...M}, M < 7 in this example (it is understood that the indices may have been renumbered for convenience), and an estimate of the additive channel noise power σ 2 in one quadrature axis at the multibeam antenna input. The equalizer weights are used in the combiner to form the real inner product for the L Λ user s ι w A * = Σ w L ,y ι , L = X - - M (l) where WLI is the I th real equalizer weight for the L^ user, yi is the I th matched antenna beam signal, and S L .S the combined signal for the L Λ user. The matched antenna beam signals are real and are calculated in the matched filter operation by M X = Re(2» .; ) , / = l,2,- (2) J= \ where Re (•) denotes the real part operation. Direct calculation of the equalizer weight vector is accomplished by solving the set of M simultaneous equations expressed in matrix/vector form Hw, = e, (3) where H = Re(A'A) + σ 2 I e u = I if L = I and 0 otherwise, I - Identity Matrix, σ 2 = channel noise power This direct calculation solution corresponds to the Minimum Mean Square Eπor (MMSE) solution determined m the preferred embodiment by means of an LMS algorithm adaptation The direct calculation solution is attractive when the number of interfering cells is not too large and multipath distortion is minimal The matrix Η is a symmetnc matrix so that the simultaneous equations (3) can be solved by a Cholskey decomposition that is descπbed m numencal computational texts such as "Least Square Estimation with Application to Digital Signal Processing" by A A Giordano and F M Ηsu, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1985, Chapter 3 3, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference In this decomposition method the matrix Η is decomposed to G'G where G is the transpose of G and G is a lower diagonal matrix, I e all the elements in the matrix above the diagonal are zero In the special case where the additive channel noise power σ 2 is taken as zero, this MMSE solution reduces to a solution that cancels all the interference, l e a zero-forcing solution It is understood that the use of additional equalizer weights m a tapped- delay-lrne filter configuration could be used to compensate for multipath distortion or to cancel previously detected interference as descπbed in MMSE Equalization, referenced above For this extended weight example, the direct solution by solving a matrix/vector equation such as ( 1), above, is accomplished by extending the matrix and vector definitions to include the additional weights The combined signal is then provided to a packet demultiplexer 29, which removes the reference data, e g , reference data 1 , from the combined signal The packet demultiplexer 29 provides the combined signal without the reference data to a deinterleaver 30, which reverses the interleaving of the coded data performed by the mterleaver 21 Finally, the deinterleaver 30 provides the deinterleaved data to a decoder 31, which performs error- correction decoding, thereby producing a digital output that is representative of the transmitted digital message information Subsequent processing, e g , digital-to-analog conversion (not shown), of the digital output may be required to obtain analog message information, e g , voice signals, of the particular user While embodiments have been shown and descnbed in accordance with the present invention, it is understood that the same is not limited thereto but is susceptible to numerous changes and modifications as known to a person skilled m this art For example, while the invention has been descπbed as operating with a reuse factor having a value of unity, it will, of course, be recognized by those skilled in the art that by not reusing a channel m one or even several, beam coverage regions, it is possible to achieve at least some of the advantages of this invention (as compared to known systems where on average the multiple access channels have a reuse factor of 1/3 to 1/ 12 th ) Such systems with reuse factors of less than one, but substantially improved over know commercial systems, e g , have a reuse factor of at least 2/3, are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims Accordingly, the present invention should not be limited to the detail shown and descπbed herein but is intended to cover all such changes and modifications as are obvious to one of ordinary skill m this art Therefore, the present invention should be limited only by the spmt and scope of the appended claims

Claims: What is claimed is 1 A method of communicating digital data information from a plurality of user terminal transmitters located in a plurality of antenna beam coverage regions to a receiver with a multibeam antenna, wherein each user terminal transmitter is associated with a beam coverage region, compπsing the steps of assigning a plurality of multiple access channels that belong to a mutually orthogonal set to the plurality of user terminal transmitters, each multiple access channel being associated with a reuse factor, which is defined by the number of user terminal Uansmitter assignments in different beam coverage regions divided by the total number of beam coverage regions, and at least one multiple access channel is reused in all beam coverage regions so that its reuse factor is unity, adding, at the user terminal Uansmitter, error-correction coding to the digital data information to provide coded information, interleaving, at the user terminal transmitter, the coded information among a plurality of data groups, inserting in time to each data group, at the user terminal transmitter, a reference signal associated with the beam coverage region of the user terminal Uansmitter to provide a multiplexed signal, modulating, at the user terminal transmitter, the multiplexed signal to a single radio-frequency axis with a multiple access waveform associated with the assigned multiple access channel to provide a multiple access signal, Uansmitting, at the user terminal transmitter, the multiple access signal, receiving, at the multibeam antenna of the receiver, the multiple access signals from the plurality of user terminal Uansmitters so as to provide a plurality of antenna beam signals, combining, at the receiver, the antenna beam signals to provide a combined signal associated with a user terminal Uansmitter, thereby reducing interference from user terminal transmitters assigned to different beam coverage regions, deinterleaving and decoding, at the receiver, the combined signal to recover the user terminal transmitter digital data information The method of claim 1 wherein the modulating step further includes modifying in a random or pseudo-random manner the fixed phase shift of the single radio-frequency axis for the duration of each data group The method of claim 2 wherein the combining step further includes generating a user-identifying replica of the reference signal associated with a user terminal transmitter The method of claim 3 wherein the combining step further includes subUacting the user-identifying replica from the combined signal to provide an error signal, minimizing the mean square value of the error signal The method of claim 3 wherein the combining step further includes producing a plurality of user-identifying replicas, coπelating combinations of user-identifying replicas with antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of user/beam cross-channel values, calculating the real part of the product of cross-channel values and antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of matched antenna beam signals converting cross-channel values into equalizer weights, summing the product of equalizer weights and matched antenna beam signals, thereby producing the combined signal The method of claim 5 wherein the converting step further includes solving a set of simultaneous equations with a Cholskey decomposition The method of claim 1 wherein the combining step further mcludes generating a user-identifying replica of the reference signal associated with a user terminal transmitter The method of claim 7 wherein the combining step further includes subtracting the user-identifying replica from the combined signal to provide an error signal, minimizing the mean square value of the error signal The method of claim 7 wherein the combining step further includes producmg a plurality of user-identifying replicas, coπelatmg combinations of user-identifying replicas with antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of user/ beam cross-channel values, calculating the real part of the product of cross-channel values and antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of matched antenna beam signals converting cross-channel values into equalizer weights, summing the product of equalizer weights and matched antenna beam signals, thereby producing the combined signed 10 The method of claim 9 wherein the converting step further includes solving a set of simultaneous equations with a Cholskey decomposition 1 1 A communication system for communicating digital data information from a plurality of user terminal transmitters located in a plurality of antenna beam coverage regions to a multibeam antenna in a receiver at a cenUal node, wherein each user terminal Uansmitter is associated with a beam coverage region , compnsing assignment controller, associated with the cenUal node, for assigning a plurality of multiple access channels that belong to a mutually orthogonal set to the plurality of user terminal Uansmitters, each multiple access channel bemg associated with a reuse factor, which is defined by the number of user terminal transmitter assignments in different beam coverage regions divided by the total number of beam co\ erage regions, and at least one multiple access channel is reused m all beam coverage regions so that its reuse factor is unity, and user terminal transmitter, disposed at the user terminal, for transmitting digital data information in a multiple access signal to the receiver comprising means for adding error-correction coding to the digital data information to provide coded information, and means for interleaving the coded information among a plurality of data groups, and means for inserting in time to each data group a reference signal associated with the beam coverage region of the user terminal Uansmitter to provide a multiplexed signal, and modulation means for modulating the multiplexed signal to a single radio-frequency axis with a multiple access waveform associated with the assigned multiple access channel to provide a multiple access signal, and receiver, disposed at the central node, for receiving at the multibeam antenna the multiple access signals from the plurality of user terminal transmitters so as to provide a plurality of antenna beam signals, comprising summation means for combining the antenna beam signals to provide a combined signal associated with a user terminal Uansmitter, thereby reducing interference from user terminal Uansmitters assigned to different beam coverage regions, and means for deinterleaving and decoding the combined signal to recover the user terminal Uansmitter digital data information A communication system according to claim 1 1 wherem the modulation means further includes means for modifying m a random or pseudo-random manner the fixed phase shift of the single radio-frequency axis for the duration of each data group 13. A communication system according to claim 12 wherein the summation means further includes: means for generating a user-identifying replica of the reference signal associated with a user terminal transmitter. 14. A communication system according to claim 13 wherein the summation means further includes: means for subtracting the user-identifying replica from the combined signal to provide an error signal, and means for minimizing the mean square value of the error signal. 15. A communication system according to claim 13 wherein the summation means further includes: means for producing a plurality of user-identifying replicas, and means for correlating combinations of user-identifying replicas with antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of user/ beam cross-channel values, and means for calculating the real part of the product of cross-channel values and antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of matched antenna beam signals, and conversion means for converting cross-channel values into equalizer weights, and means for surnming the product of equalizer weights and matched antenna beam signals, thereby producing the combined signal. 16. A communication system according to claim 15 wherem the conversion means further includes: means for solving a set of simultaneous equations with a Cholskey decomposition. 17. A communication system according to claim 1 1 wherein the summation means further includes: means for generating a user-identifying replica of the reference signal associated with a user terminal Uansmitter. 18. A communication system according to claim 17 wherein the summation means further includes: means for subtracting the user-identifying replica from the combined signal to provide an error signal, and means for minimizing the mean square value of the error signal 19 A communication system according to claim 17 wherem the summation means further includes means for producing a plurality of user-identifying replicas, and means for correlating combinations of user-identifying replicas with antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of user/beam cross-channel values, and means for calculating the real part of the product of cross-channel values and antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of matched antenna beam signals, and conversion means for converting cross-channel values into equalizer weights, and means for summing the product of equalizer weights and matched antenna beam signals, thereby producing the combined signal. 20 A communication system according to claim 19 wherem the conversion means further includes means for solving a set of simultaneous equations with a Cholskey decomposition 21 A method for receiving and processing digital information transmitted from a plurality of user terminals, located m plural beam coverage areas, at a cenUal node have a receiver and an associated multibeam antenna that produces the plural beam coverage areas, and each user terminal transmits a user-identifying reference and digital data information that is error-corrected coded and interleaved in a single-axis modulated signal associated with a multiple access channel that belongs to a mutually orthogonal set to the receiver, compπsing the steps of assigning a multiple access channel to a first user terminal in a first beam coverage region and assigning the same multiple access channel to a second user terminal in a second beam coverage region and the user/ beam cross-channel attenuation between the first and second user terminals is unrestncted, receiving, at the multibeam antenna, the smgle-axis modulated signals from the first and second user terminals so as to provide a plurality of antenna beam signals, generating a user-identifying replica of the reference signal associated with the first user terminal, processing the antenna beam signals and the user-identifying replica to provide a combined signal associated with the first user terminal, thereby reducing interference from the second user terminal, deinterleaving and decoding the combined signal to recover the first user terminal digital information 22 The method of claim 21 wherem the processing step further includes: subUacting the user-identifying replica from the combined signal to provide an error signal, minimizing the mean square value of the error signal 23 The method of claim 21 wherem the generating step further includes. producing a second user-identifying replica associated with the second user terminal, and wherem the processing step further includes coπelating combinations of user-identifymg replicas with antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of user/ beam cross-channel values, calculating the real part of the product of cross-channel values and antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of matched antenna beam signals, converting cross-channel values into equalizer weights, summing the product of equalizer weights and matched antenna beam signals, thereby producing the combined signal 24 The method of claim 23 wherem the converting step further includes solving a set of simultaneous equations with a Cholskey decomposition. 25. A central node with a receiver including a multibeam antenna, which produces beam coverage areas in which a plurality of user terminals are located and each user terminal transmits a user-identifying reference and digital data information that is error-corrected coded and interleaved in a single-axis modulated signal associated with a multiple access channel that belongs to a mutually orthogonal set to the receiver, comprising: means for assigning a multiple access channel to a first user terminal in a first beam coverage region and assigning the same multiple access channel to a second user terminal in a second beam coverage region and the user/ beam cross- channel attenuation between the first and second user terminals is unrestricted, and means for receiving, at the multibeam antenna, the single-axis modulated signals from the first and second user terminals so as to provide a plurality of antenna beam signals, and generating means for generating a user- identifying replica of the reference signal associated with the first user terminal, and processing means for processing the antenna beam signals and the user-identifying replica to provide a combined signal associated with the first user terminal, thereby reducing interference from the second user terminal, and means for deinterleaving and decoding the combined signal to recover the first user terminal digital information. 26. The method of claim 25 wherein the processing means further includes: means for subtracting the user-identifying replica from the combined signal to provide an error signal, and means for minimizing the mean square value of the error signal. 27. The method of claim 25 wherein the generating means further includes: means for producing a second user-identifying replica associated with the second user terminal, and wherein the processing means further includes: means for correlating combinations of user-identifying replicas with antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of user/beam cross-channel values, and means for calculating the real part of the product of cross-channel values and antenna beam signals to provide a plurality of matched antenna beam signals, and converting means for converting cross-channel values into equalizer weights, and means for summing the product of equalizer weights and matched antenna beam signals, thereby producing the combined signal. 28. The method of claim 27 wherein the converting means further includes: means for solving a set of simultaneous equations with a Cholskey decomposition.

Inventors: MONSEN PETER, MONSEN, PETER
Applicants: MONSEN PETER, MONSEN, PETER
Application year: 2000
Main classification: H04L27
IPC codes: H04L1