INSECT p53 TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES AND PROTEINS

Abstract: A family of p53 tumor suppressor nucleic acid and protein isolated from several insect species is described. The p53 nucleic acid and protein can be used to genetically modify metazoan invertebrate organisms, such as insects and worms, or cultured cells, resulting in p53 expression or mis-expression. The genetically modified organisms or cells can be used in screening assays to identify candidate compounds that are potential pesticidal agents or therapeutics that interact with p53 protein. They can also be used in methods for studying p53 activity and identifying other genes that modulate the function of, or interact with, the p53 gene. Nucleic acid and protein sequences for Drosophila p33 and Rb tumor suppressors are also described.

Description: INSECT p53 TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES AND PROTEINS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application no. 09/268,969, filed March 16, 1999; and of U.S. application no. 60/184,373 of same title, filed February 23, 2000. The entire contents of both prior applications are incorporated herein by reference. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The p53 gene is mutated in over 50 different types of human cancers, including familial and spontaneous cancers, and is believed to be the most commonly mutated gene m human cancer (Zambetti and Levine, FASEB (1993) 7-855-865; Hollstein, et al., Nucleic Acids Res. (1994) 22:3551-3555). Greater than 90% of mutations in the p53 gene are missense mutations that alter a single ammo acid that inactivates p53 function. Aberrant forms of human p53 are associated with poor prognosis, more aggressive tumors, metastasis, and survival rates of less than 5 years (Koshland, Science (1993) 262:1953). The human p53 protein normally functions as a central integrator of signals arising from different forms of cellular stress, including DNA damage, hypoxia, nucleotide depπvation, and oncogene activation (Pπves, Cell (1998) 95:5-8). In response to these signals, p53 protein levels are greatly increased with the result that the accumulated p53 activates pathways of cell cycle arrest or apoptosis depending on the nature and strength of these signals. Indeed, multiple lines of experimental evidence have pointed to a key role for p53 as a tumor suppressor (Levine, Cell (1997) 88:323-331). For example, homozygous p53 "knockout" mice are developmentally normal but exhibit nearly 100% incidence of neoplasm in the first year of life (Donehower et al., Nature (1992) 356:215-221). The biochemical mechanisms and pathways through which p53 functions in normal and cancerous cells are not fully understood, but one clearly important aspect of p53 function is its activity as a gene-specific transcriptional activator Among the genes with known p53- response elements are several with well-characterized roles in either regulation of the cell cycle or apoptosis. including GADD45 . p21/Wafl/Cιpl, cyc n G, Bax, IGF-BP3, and MDM2 (Levine. Cell (1997) 88:323-331) Human p53 is a 393 amino acid phosphoprotem which is divided structurally and functionally into distinct domains joined in the following order trom N-teπninus to C- terminus of the polypeptide chain' (a) a transcriptional activation domain; (b) a sequence- specific DNA-bmdmg domain; (c) a linker domain; (d) an oligomerization domain: and (e) a basic regulatory domain. Other structural details of the p53 protein are m keeping with its function as a sequence-specific gene activator that responds to a variety of stress signals. For example, the most N-terminal domain of p53 is rich in acidic residues, consistent with structural features of other transcriptional activators (Fields and Jang, Science (1990) 249: 1046-49). By contrast, the most C-termmal domain of p53 is rich in basic residues, and has the ability to bind single-stranded DNA, double-stranded DNA ends, and internal deletions loops (Jayaraman and Pnves, Cell ( 1995) 81 : 1021- 1029). The association of the p53 C-termmal basic regulatoi y domain with these forms of DNA that are generated dunng DNA repair may tnggei conversion of p53 from a latent to an activated state capable of site-specific DNA binding to target genes (Hupp and Lane, Curr. Biol. (1994) 4: 865-875). thereby providing one mechanism to regulate p53 function in response to DNA damage. Importantly, both the N-terminal activation domain and the C-terminal basic regulatory domain of p53 are subject to numerous covalent modifications which correlate with stress- induced signals (Pnves, Cell (1998) 95:5-8). For example, the N-terminal activation domain contains residues that are targets for phosphorylation by the DNA-activated protein kinase, the ATM kinase, and the cyclin activated kinase complex. The C-terminal basic regulatory domain contains residues that are targets for phosphorylation by protein kinase- C. cyclin dependent kinase. and casein kinase II, as well as residues that are targets for acetylation by PCAF and p300 acetyl transterases. p53 activity is also modulated by specific non-covalent protein -protein interactions (Ko and Pnves, Genes Dev. ( 1996) 10: 1054-1072). Most notably, the MDM2 protein binds a short, highly conserved protein sequence motif, residues 13-29, in the N-terminal activation domain of p53 (Kussie et al., Science (1996) 274:948-953 As a result of binding p53, MDM2 both represses p53 transcnptional activity and promotes the degradation of p53 Although several mammalian and vertebrate homologs of the tumor suppressor p53 have been descnbed. only tw o invertebrate homologs have been identified to date in mollusc and squid. Few lines of evidence, however, have hinted at the existence of a p53 homolog in any other invertebrate species, such as the fruit fly Drosophila Indeed, numerous direct attempts to isolate a Drosophila p53 gene by either cross-hybridization or PCR have failed to identify a p53-lιke gene in this species (Soussi et al., Oncogene ( 1990) 5: 945-952). However, other studies of response to DNA damage in insect cells using nucleic cross-hybndization and antibody cross-reactivity have provided suggestive evidence for existence of p53-. p21 -. and MDM2- like genes (Bae et al., Exp Cell Res ( 1995) 375: 105- 106; Yakes. 1994, Ph.D. thesis. Wayne State University). Nonetheless, no isolated insect p53 genes or proteins have been reported to date. Identification of novel p53 orthologues in model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster and other insect species provides important and useful tools for genetic and molecular study and validation of these molecules as potential pharmaceutical and pesticide targets. The present invention discloses insect p53 genes and proteins from a vanety of diverse insect species. In addition. Drosophila homologs of p33 and Rb genes, which are also involved in tumor suppression, are descnbed. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to provide insect p53 nucleic acid and protein sequences that can be used in genetic screening methods to charactenze pathways that p53 may be involved m as well as other interacting genetic pathways. It is also an object of the invention to provide methods for screening compounds that interact with p53 such as those that may have utility as therapeutics. These and other objects are provided by the present invention which concerns the identification and charactenzation of insect p53 genes and proteins in a variety of insect species. Isolated nucleic acid molecules are provided that compnse nucleic acid sequences encoding p53 polypeptides and derivatives thereof. Vectors and host ceils comprising the p53 nucleic acid molecules are also descnbed. as well as metazoan invertebrate organisms (e.g. insects, coelomates and pseudocoelomates) that are genetically modified to express or mis-express a p53 protein. An important utility of the insect p53 nucleic acids and proteins is that they can be used in screening assays to identify candidate compounds which are potential therapeutics or pesticides that interact with p53 proteins. Such assays typically comprise contacting a p53 polypeptide with one or more candidate molecules, and detecting any interaction between the candidate compound and the p53 polypeptide. The assays may comprise adding the candidate molecules to cultures of cells genetically engineered to express p53 proteins, or alternatively, administenng the candidate compound to a metazoan invertebrate organism genetically engineered to express p53 protein. The genetically engineered metazoan invertebrate animals of the invention can also be used in methods for studying p53 activity, or for validating therapeutic or pesticidal strategies based on manipulation of the p53 pathway These methods typically involve detecting the phenotype caused by the expression or mis-expression of the p53 protein. The methods may additionally compnse observing a second animal that has the same genetic modification as the fust animal and, additionally has a mutation in a gene of interest. Any difference between the phenotypes of the two animals identifies the gene of interest as capable of modifying the function of the gene encoding the p53 protein BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURE Figures 1A-1B show a CLUSTALW alignment of the amino acid sequences of the insect p53 proteins identified horn Drosophila. Leptinotarsa. Iribolium, and Heliotlus. with p53 sequences previously identified in human. Xenopus. and squid Identical amino acid residues within the alignment are grouped within solid lines and similar amino acid residues are grouped within dashed lines DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The use of invertebrate model organism genetics and related technologies can greatly facilitate the elucidation of biological pathways (Scangos, Nat. Biotechnol. (1997) 15: 1220-1221. Margohs and Duyk, Nature Biotech (1998) 16-311). Of particular use is the insect model organism. Diosoplula melanogaster (hereinafter referred to generally as "DrosophikO An extensive search for p53 nucleic acid and its encoded protein in Drosophila was conducted in an attempt to identify new and useful tools for probing the function and regulation of the p53 genes, and for use as targets in diug discovery. p53 nucleic acid has also been identified in the following additional insect species: Leptinotarsa decemilineata (Colorado potato beetle, hereinafter referred to as Leptinotarsa), Tribohum castaneum (flour beetle, hereinafter refeπ-ed to as Tribohum), and Heliotlus virescens (tobacco budworm. hereinafter referred to as Heliotlus) The newly identified insect p53 nucleic acids can be used for the generation of mutant phenotypes in animal models or in liv ing cells that can be used to study regulation of p53, and the use of p53 as a drug oi pesticide target Due to the ability to rapidly carry out large-scale, systematic genetic scieens. the use of invertebrate model organisms such as Drosophila has great utility foi analyzing the expression and mis-expression of p53 protein Thus, the invention piovides a supenor approach for identifying other components involved in the synthesis, activity, and regulation of p53 proteins Systematic genetic analysis of p53 using invertebrate model organisms can lead to the identification and validation of compound targets directed to components of the p53 pathway Model organisms or cultured cells that have been genetically engineered to express p53 can be used to screen candidate compounds for their ability to modulate p53 expression or activity, and thus are useful in the identification of new drug targets, therapeutic agents, diagnostics and prognostics useful in the treatment of disorders associated with cell cycle, DNA repair, and apoptosis. The details of the conditions used tor the identification and/or isolation of insect p53 nucleic acids and proteins are descnbed in the Examples section below Vanous non- limiting embodiments of the invention, applications and uses of the insect p53 genes and proteins are discussed in the following sections The entire contents of all references, including patent applications, cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes Additionally, the citation of a reference in the preceding background section is not an admission of pnor art against the claims appended hereto. p53 Nucleic Acids The following nucleic acid sequences encoding insect p53 are descnbed herein: SEQ ID NO: l, isolated from Drosophila. and referred to herein as DMp53; SEQ ID NO:3, isolated from Leptinotarsa, and referred to herein as CPBp53. SEQ ID NO:5 and SEQ ID NO:7, isolated from Tribohum, and referred to herein as TRIB-Ap53 and TRIB-Bp53, respectively; and SEQ ID NO 9. isolated from Heliotlus, and referred to herein as HELIOp53. The genomic sequence of the DMp53 gene is piovided in SEQ ID NO: 18. In addition to the fragments and deriv atives of SEQ ID NOs: l, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 18, as described in detail below, the invention includes the reverse complements thereof. Also, the subject nucleic acid sequences, denvatives and fragments thereof may be RNA molecules compnsmg the nucleotide sequences of SEQ ID NOs: l , 3. 5, 7, 9, and 18 (or denvative or fragment thereof) w herein the base U (uracil) is substituted for the base T (thymine). The DNA and RNA sequences of the invention can be single- or double- stranded. Thus, the term "isolated nucleic acid sequence " ' oi "isolated nucleic acid molecule", as used herein, includes the reverse complement. RNA equivalent. DNA or RNA single- or double-stranded sequences, and DNA/RNA hybnds of the sequence being descnbed, unless otherwise indicated Fragments of the p53 nucleic acid sequences can be used for a variety of purposes. Interfenng RNA (RNAi) ti agments, particulai ly double-stranded (ds) RNAi, can be used to generate loss-of-function phenotypes p53 nucleic acid fragments are also useful as nucleic acid hybndization probes and replication/amplification pnmers. Certain "antisense" fragments, i.e. that are reverse complements of portions of the coding sequence of any of SEQ DD NO: l, 3, 5, 7, 9, or 18 have utility in inhibiting the function of p53 proteins. The fragments are of length sufficient to specificalh hvbndize with the corresponding SEQ ID NO: l, 3, 5, 7. 9, or 18. The fragments consist of or compnse at least 12. preferably at least 24. more preferably at least 36. and more preferably at least 96 contiguous nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9. and 18. When the fragments are flanked by other nucleic acid sequences, the total length of the combined nucleic acid sequence is less than 15 kb, preferably less than 10 kb or less than 5kb. more preferably less than 2 kb, and in some cases, preferably less than 500 bases. Preferred p53 nucleic acid fragments compnse regulatory elements that may reside in the 5' UTR and/or encode one or more of the following domains: an activation domain, a DNA binding domain, a linker domain, an oligomerization domain, and a basic regulatory domain. The approximate locations of these regions in SEQ ID Nos 1 , 3, and 5. and in the corresponding amino acid sequences of SEQ ID Nos 2, 4, and 6, 8, are provided in Table 1. TABLE 1 Further preferred are fragments of bases 354-495 of SEQ ID NO:7 and bases 315-414 of SEQ ID NO:9 of at least 12, preferably at least 24. more preferably at least 36, and most preferably at least 96 contiguous nucleotides. The subject nucleic acid sequences may consist solely of any one of SEQ ID NOs:l, 3, 5, 7, 9. or 18. or f ragments thereof. Alternatively, the subject nucleic acid sequences and fragments thereof may be joined to other components such as labels, peptides, agents that facilitate transport across cell membranes, hybndization-tπggered cleavage agents or intercalating agents. The subject nucleic acid sequences and fragments thereof may also be joined to other nucleic acid sequences (i.e they may compnse part of larger sequences) and are of synthetic/non-natural sequences and or are isolated and/or are punfied, i.e. unaccompanied by at least some of the material with which it is associated in its natural state. Preferably, the isolated nucleic acids constitute at least about 0.5%, and more preferably at least about 5% by weight of the total nucleic acid present in a given fraction, and are preferably recombinant, meaning that they comprise a non-natural sequence or a natural sequence joined to nucleotιde(s) other than that which it is joined to on a natural chromosome. Denvative nucleic acid sequences of p53 include sequences that hybπdize to the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs: l , 3, 5, 7, 9, or 18 under stringency conditions such that the hybridizing derivative nucleic acid is related to the subject nucleic acid by a certain degree of sequence identity. A nucleic acid molecule is "hybndizable" to another nucleic acid molecule, such as a cDNA, genomic DNA, or RNA, when a single stranded form of the nucleic acid molecule can anneal to the other nucleic acid molecule. Stnngency of hybridization refers to conditions under which nucleic acids are hybndizable. The degree of stnngency can be controlled by temperature, ionic strength, pH, and the presence of denaturing agents such as formamide during hybridization and washing. As used herein, the term "stringent hybridization conditions " are those normally used by one of skill in the art to establish at least about a 90% sequence identity between complementary pieces of DNA or DNA and RNA. "Moderately stringent hybridization conditions " are used to find denvatives having at least about a 70% sequence identity. Finally, "low-stnngency hybndization conditions " are used to isolate deriv ative nucleic acid molecules that share at least about 507. sequence identity with the subject nucleic acid sequence. The ultimate hybridization stringency reflects both the actual hybridization conditions as w ell as the washing conditions following the hybridization, and it is well known in the art how to vary the conditions to obtain the desired result. Conditions routinely used are set out in readily available procedure texts (e.g., Current Protocol in Molecular Biology. Vol 1. Chap. 2.10. John Wiley & Sons, Publishers ( 1994): Sambrook et al.. Molecular Cloning. Cold Spring Harbor ( 1989)) A prefen-ed denvative nucleic acid is capable of hybndizing to any one of SEQ ID NOs: l . 3. 5, 7. 9, or 18 under stnngent hybndization conditions that compnse: prehybndization of filters containing nucleic acid for 8 hours to overnight at 65° C in a solution compnsmg 6X single strength citrate (SSC) (IX SSC is 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M Na citrate; pH 7.0), 5X Denhardt's solution, 0.05% sodium pyrophosphate and 100 /xg/ml hemng sperm DNA; hybndization for 18-20 hours at 65° C in a solution containing 6X SSC, IX Denhardt's solution, 100 μg/ml yeast tRNA and 0.05% sodium pyrophosphate; and washing of filters at 65° C for 1 h in a solution containing 0.2X SSC and 0.1 % SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate). Denvative nucleic acid sequences that have at least about 70% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: l, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 18 are capable of hybridizing to any one of SEQ ID NO: l, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 18 under moderately stnngent conditions that compnse: pretreatment of filters containing nucleic acid for 6 h at 40° C m a solution containing 35% formamide, 5X SSC, 50 mM Tns-HCl (pH 7.5). 5 mM EDTA. 0.1% PVP, 0.17c Ficoll, 1% BSA. and 500 μg ml denatured salmon sperm DNA: hybridization for 18-20 h at 40° C in a solution containing 357c formamide, 5X SSC. 50 mM Tns-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 0.027 PVP, 0.027o Ficoll, 0.2% BSA. 100 μg/ml salmon sperm DNA. and 107o (wt/vol) dextran sulfate; followed by washing twice for 1 hour at 55° C in a solution containing 2X SSC and 0.17o SDS. Other preferred derivative nucleic acid sequences are capable of hybndizing to any one of SEQ ID NOs: l, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 18 under low stringency conditions that compnse: incubation for 8 hours to overnight at 37° C in a solution compnsmg 20% formamide, 5 x SSC, 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.6). 5X Denhardt ' s solution, 10% dextran sulfate. and 20 μg/ml denatured sheared salmon sperm DNA. hybridization in the same buffer for 18 to 20 hours; and washing of filters in 1 x SSC at about 37° C for 1 hour As used herein, "percent (% ) nucleic acid sequence identity " w ith respect to a subject sequence, or a specified portion of a subject sequence, is defined as the percentage of nucleotides in the candidate denvative nucleic acid sequence identical with the nucleotides in the subject sequence (or specified portion thereof), after aligning the sequences and introducing gaps, if necessary to achieve the maximum percent sequence identity, as generated by the program WU-BLAST-2.0al9 (Altschul et al.. J. Mol. Biol. (1997) 215:403-410; http://blast.wustl.edu/blast/README.html; hereinafter referred to generally as "BLAST " ) with all the search parameters set to default values The HSP S and HSP S2 parameters are dynamic values and are established by the program itself depending upon the composition of the particular sequence and composition ol the particular database against which the sequence of interest is being searched. A percent (7c) nucleic acid sequence identity value is determined by the number of matching identical nucleotides divided by the sequence length for which the percent identity is being reported. Denvative p53 nucleic acid sequences usually have at least 50% sequence identity, preferably at least 60%, 70%. or 807r> sequence identity, more preferably at least 85% sequence identity, still more preferably at least 907c sequence identity, and most preferably at least 95% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs. l , 3, 5, 7, 9. or 18. or domain- encoding regions thereof. In one preferred embodiment, the denvative nucleic acid encodes a polypeptide comprising a p53 amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs:2, 4. 6. 8. or 10, or a fragment or derivative thereof as descnbed further below under the subheading "p53 proteins". A denvative p53 nucleic acid sequence, or fragment thereof, may compnse 100% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs- 1. 3, 5. 7, 9, or 18. but be a denvative thereof in the sense that it has one or more modifications at the base or sugar moiety, or phosphate backbone. Examples of modifications are well known in the art (Bailey, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry ( 1998), 6th ed. Wiley and Sons). Such denvatives may be used to provide modified stability or any other desired property. Another type of derivative of the subject nucleic acid sequences includes corresponding humanized sequences. A humanized nucleic acid sequence is one in which one or more codons has been substituted with a codon that is more commonly used in human genes. Preferably, a sufficient number of codons have been substituted such that a higher level expression is achieved in mammalian cells than what would otherwise be achieved without the substitutions. The follow mg list shows, for each amino acid, the calculated codon frequency (number in parentheses) in humans genes for 1000 codons (Wada et α.., Nucleic Acids Research ( 1990) 18(Suppl.):2367-241 1 ): Human codon frequency per 1000 codons: ARG: CGA (5.4), CGC (11.3), CGG (104). CGU (4.7), AGA (9.9). AGG (11.1) LEU: CUA (6.2), CUC (19.9). CUG (42.5). CUU (10.7), UUA (5.3). UUG (11.0) SER: UCA (9.3). UCC (17.7), UCG (42). UCU (13.2), AGC (18.7). AGU (9.4) THR: ACA (14.4). ACC (23.0). ACG (6.7). ACU (12.7) PRO: CCA (14.6), CCC (20.0). CCG (66). CCU (15.5) ALA: GCA (14.0). GCC (29.1). GCG (7.2). GCU (196) GLY: GGA (17.1). GGC (25.4), GGG (173), GGU (11.2) VAL: GUA (5.9). GUC (16.3), GUG (309). GUU (10.4) LYS: AAA (22.2). AAG (34.9) ASN: AAC (22.6). AAU (16.6) GLN: CAA (11.1). CAG (33.6) HIS: CAC (14.2), CAU (9.3) GLU: GAA (26.8), GAG (41.4) ASP: GAC (29.0), GAU (21.7) TYR: UAC (18.8), UAU (12.5) CYS: UGC (14.5), UGU (9.9) PHE: UUU (22.6), UUC (15.8) ILE: AUA (5.8). AUC (24.3). AUU (14.9) MET: AUG(22.3) TRP: UGG(13.8) TER: UAA (0.7), AUG (0.5). UGA (1.2) Thus, a p53 nucleic acid sequence in which the glutamic acid codon. GAA has been replaced with the codon GAG, which is more commonly used in human genes, is an example of a humanized p53 nucleic acid sequence. A detailed discussion of the humanization of nucleic acid sequences is pro ided in U.S. Pat. No. 5,874,304 to Zolotukh et al. Similarly, other nucleic acid derivatives can be generated with codon usage optimized for expression in other organisms, such as yeasts, bacteπa, and plants, where it is desired to engineer the expression of p53 proteins by using specific codons chosen according to the preferred codons used in highly expressed genes in each organism. More specific embodiments of preferred p53 proteins, fragments, and denvatives are discussed further below in connection under the subheading "p53 proteins". Nucleic acid encoding the amino acid sequence of any of SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, or fragment or derivative thereof, may be obtained from an appropriate cDNA library prepared from any eukaryotic species that encodes p53 proteins such as vertebrates, preferably mammalian (e.g. primate, porcine, bo ine, feline, equine, and canine species. etc.) and invertebrates, such as arthropods, particularly insects species (preferably Drosophila, Tribolium. Leptinotarsa. and Heliotlus), acaricls. crustacea. molluscs, nematodes. and other worms. An expression library can be constructed using known methods. For example, mRNA can be isolated to make cDNA which is hgated into a suitable expression vector for expression in a host cell into which it is introduced. Vanous screening assays can then be used to select for the gene or gene product (e.g. oligonucleotides of at least about 20 to 80 bases designed to identify the gene of interest, or labeled antibodies that specifically bind to the gene product). The gene and/or gene product can then be recovered from the host cell using kno n techniques. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can also be used to isolate nucleic acids of the p53 genes where oligonucleotide pnmers representing fragmentary sequences of interest amplify RNA or DNA sequences from a source such as a genomic or cDNA library (as descnbed by Sambrook et al.. supra). Additionally, degenerate pnmers for amplifying homologs from any species of interest may be used Once a PCR product of appropπate size and sequence is obtained, it may be cloned and sequenced by standard techniques, and utilized as a probe to isolate a complete cDNA or genomic clone. Fragmentary sequences of p53 nucleic acids and derivatives may be synthesized by known methods. For example, oligonucleotides may be synthesized using an automated DNA synthesizer available from commercial suppliers (e.g. Biosearch. Novato, CA; Perkm- Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City. CA). Antisense RNA sequences can be produced intracellularly by transcription from an exogenous sequence, e.g. from vectors that contain antisense p53 nucleic acid sequences. Newly generated sequences may be identified and isolated using standard methods. An isolated p53 nucleic acid sequence can be inserted into any appropnate cloning vector, for example bacteπophages such as lambda derivatives, or plasmids such as PBR322, pUC plasmid denvatives and the Bluescπpt vector (Stratagene, San Diego, CA). Recombinant molecules can be introduced into host cells via transformation, transfection, infection, electroporation, etc., or into a transgenic animal such as a fly. The transformed cells can be cultured to generate large quantities of the p53 nucleic acid. Suitable methods for isolating and producing the subject nucleic acid sequences are well-known in the art (Sambrook et al.. supra; DNA Cloning: A Practical Approach, Vol. 1 , 2, 3, 4, (1995) Glover, ed.. MRL Press, Ltd., Oxford. U.K.). The nucleotide sequence encoding a p53 protein or fragment or denvative thereof, can be inserted into any appropnate expression v ector for the transcription and translation of the inserted protein-coding sequence. Alternatively, the necessary transcnptional and translational signals can be supplied by the native p53 gene and/or its flanking regions. A vaπety of host- vector systems may be utilized to express the protein-codmg sequence such as mammalian cell systems infected with virus (e g vaccinia virus, adenovirus. etc.): insect cell systems infected with virus (e.g. baculovirus); microorganisms such as yeast containing yeast vectors, or bacteria transformed with bacteπophage, DNA, plasmid DNA, or cosmid DNA. If expression in plants is desired, a vaπety of transformation constructs, vectors and methods are known in the art (see U.S. Pat. No 6.002.068 for review) Expression of a p53 protein may be controlled by a suitable promoter/enhancer element. In addition, a host cell strain may be selected which modulates the expression of the inserted sequences, or modifies and processes the gene product in the specific fashion desired To detect expression of the p53 gene product, the expression vector can compnse a promoter operably linked to a p53 gene nucleic acid, one or more ongins of replication, and, one or more selectable markers (e.g. thymidme kinase activity, resistance to antibiotics. etc.). Alternatively, recombinant expression vectors can be identified by assaying for the expression of the p53 gene product based on the physical or functional properties of the p53 protein in in vitro assay systems (e. g. immunoassays or cell cycle assays). The p53 protein, fragment, or denvative may be optionally expressed as a fusion, or chimenc protein product as descnbed above. Once a recombinant that expresses the p53 gene sequence is identified, the gene product can be isolated and purified using standard methods (e.g. ion exchange, affinity, and gel exclusion chromatography: centrifugation: differential solubility: electrophoresis). The amino acid sequence of the protein can be deduced from the nucleotide sequence of the chimenc gene contained in the recombinant and can thus be synthesized by standard chemical methods (Hunkapiller et al.. Nature ( 1984) 310: 105-1 11). Alternatively, native p53 proteins can be purified from natural sources, by standard methods (e.g. immunoaffinity purification). p33 and Rb Nucleic Acids The invention also provides nucleic acid sequences for Drosophila p33 (SEQ ID NO: 19), and Rb (SEQ ID NO:21 ) tumor suppressors. Derivatives and fragments of these sequences can be prepared as described above for the p53 sequences. Preferred fragments and denvatives compnse the same number of contiguous nucleotides or same degrees of percent identity as described above for p53 nucleic acid sequences. The disclosure below regarding various uses of p53 tumor suppressor nucleic acids and proteins (e.g. transgenic animals, tumor suppressor assays, etc.) also applies to the p33 and Rb tumor suppressor sequences disclosed herein. p53 Proteins The CLUSTALW program (Thompson, et ai. Nucleic Acids Research (1994) 22(22):4673-4680) was used to align the insect p53 proteins described herein with p53 proteins from human (Zakut-Houn et al.. EMBO J. ( 1985) 4: 1251- 1255; GenBank gi: 129369), Xenopu.s (Sousi et al.. Oncogene ( 1987) 1 :71-78; GenBank gi: 129374), and squid (GenBank gi: 1244762). The alignment generated is shown in Figure 1 and reveals a number of features m the insect p53 proteins that are charactenstic of the previously- identified p53 proteins With iespect to general areas of structural similanty, the DMp53, CPBp53, and TRIB-Ap53 proteins can be roughly divided into three regions- a central region which exhibits a high degree of sequence homology with other known p53 family proteins and which roughly corresponds to the DNA binding domain of this protein family (Cho et ai. Science ( 1994) 265:346-355), and flanking N-terminal and C-terminal regions which exhibit significantly less homology but which correspond in overall size to other p53 family proteins The fragmentary polypeptide sequences encoded by the TRIB-Bp53 and HELIOp53 cDNAs are shown by the multiple sequence alignment to be denved from the central region - the conserved DNA-binding domain Significantly, the protein sequence alignment allowed the assignment of the domains in the DMp53, CPBp53, and TRIB-A p53 proteins listed in Table 1 above, based on sequence homology w ith previously characterized domains of human p53 (Sousi and May. J Mol Biol (1996) 260:623-637: Levine, supra. Pnves, Cell ( 1998) 95 5-8) Importantly, the most conserved central regions of the DMp53. CPBp53, and TRIB- A p53 proteins correspond almost precisely to the known functional boundaries of the DNA binding domain of human p53, indicating that these proteins are likely to exhibit similar DNA binding properties to those of human p53 A detailed examination of the conserved residues in this domain further emphasizes the likely structuial and functional similanties between human p53 and the insect p53 proteins First, residues of the human p53 known to be involved in direct DNA contacts (K120, S241. R248, R273, C277. and R280) correspond to identical or similar residues in the DMp53 piotem (Kl 13, S230, R234, K259, C263, and R266). and identical residues in the CPBp53 protein (K92, S216, R224. R249. C253, and R256), and the TRIB-Ap53 protein (K88. S213. R220. R245. C249, and R252). Also, with regard to the overall folding of this domain, it w as notable that foui key residues that coordinate the zinc hgand in the DNA binding domain of human p53 (C176. H179, C238, and C242) are precisely conserved m the DMp53 piotein (C156, HI 59. C227, and C231), the CPBp53 protein (C147. H150, C213. and C217). and the TRIB-A p53 protein (C144, H147, C210. C214) Furthermore, it was stπking that the mutational hot spots in human p53 most frequently altered in cancer (R 175, G245. R248. R249, R273, and R282), are either identical or conserved ammo acid residues in the corresponding positions of the DMp53 protein (R155. G233, R234, K235. K259. and R268). the CPBp53 protein (R 146, G221, R224. R225, R249, and K258). and the TRIB-Ap53 protein (R 143, G217, R220, R221. R245. and K254) Interestingly, the insect p53s also have distinct differences from the Human, Xenopii . and squid p53s Specifically, insect p53s contain a unique amino acid sequence within the DNA recognition domain that has the following sequence- (R or K)(I or V)C(S or T)CPKRD. Specifically, ammo acid iesidues 259 to 267 of DMp53 have the sequence: KICTCPKRD, residues 249 to 257 of CPBp53 have the sequence- RICSCPKRD; and residues 245-253 of TRIB-Ap53 have the sequence. RVCSCPKRD. This is in distinct contrast to the Human. Xenopiis, and squid p53s which have the following corresponding sequence: R(I oi V)CACPGRD. Another region of insect p53s that distinctly differs from previously identified p53s lies in the zinc coordination region of the DNA binding domain. The following sequence is conserved within the insect p53s: FXC(K or Q)NSC (where X = any ammo acid). Specifically, residues 225-231 of DMp53 have the sequence- FVCQNSC. residues 211-217 of CPBp53 and residues 208-214 of TRIB-Ap53 have the sequence FVCKNSC; and the corresponding residues in Heho-p53. as shown in Figure 1 , have the sequence: FSCKNSC. In contrast, the cortesponding sequence in Human and Xenopiis p53 is YMCNSSC, and in squid it is FMCLGSC The high degree of structural homologv in the presumptive DNA binding domain of the insect p53 proteins has important implications for engineenng denvative (e.g. mutant) forms of these p53 genes for tests of function in vitro and in vivo, and for genetic dissection or manipulation of the p53 pathway in transgenic insects or insect cell lines. Dominant negative forms of human p53 have been generated by creating altered proteins which have a defective DNA binding domain, but which retain a functional ohgomenzation domain (Brachman et al.. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA ( 1996) 93-4091-4095). Such dominant negative mutant forms aie extremely useful for determining the effects of loss-of-function of p53 in assays of interest Thus, mutations in highly conserved positions within the DNA binding domain of the insect p53 proteins, which correspond to residues known to be important for the structure and function of human p53 (such as R175H, H179N, and R280T of human p53). are likely to result in dominant negative forms of insect p53 proteins. For example, specific mutations in the DMp53 protein to create dominant negative mutant forms of the protein include R 155H. H159N. and R266T and foi the TRIB-A p53 protein include R143H, H147N. and R252T Although other domains of the insect p53 proteins, aside from the DNA binding domain, exhibit significantly less homology compared to the known p53 family proteins, the sequence alignment provides important information about their structure and potential function. Notably, just as in the human p53 protein, the C-termmal 20-25 amino acids of the protein comprise a putative region that extends beyond the ohgomenzation domain, suggesting an analogous function for this region of the insect p53 proteins in regulating activity of the protein. Since deletion of the C-terminal regulatory domain in human p53 has been shown to generate constitutively activated forms of the protein (Hupp and Lane. Curr. Biol. (1994) 4-865-875). it is expected that removal of most or all of the corresponding regulatory domain from the insect p53 proteins will generate an activated protein form Thus preferred truncated forms of the insect p53 proteins lack at least 10 C- terminal amino acids, more preferably at least 15 ammo acids, and most preferably at least 20 C-terminal amino acids. For example, a pi ef erred truncated version of DMp53 compnses amino acid residues 1-376. more preferably residues 1-371. and most preferably residues 1-366 of SEQ ID NO 2. Such constitutively activated mutant forms of the protein are very useful for tests of protein function using m vivo and in vitro assays, as well as for genetic analysis. The ohgomenzation domain of the insect p53 proteins exhibit very limited skeletal sequence homology with other p53 family proteins, although the length of this region is similar to that of other p53 family proteins. The extent of sequence divergence in this region of the insect proteins raises the possibility that the insect p53 protein may be unable to form hetero-oligomers with p53 proteins from vertebrates or squid. And, although the linker domain located between the DNA binding and ohgomenzation domains also exhibits relatively little sequence conservation, this region of any of the DMp53, CPBp53, and TRIB-A p53 proteins contains predicted nuclear localization signals similar to those identified in human p53 (Shaulsky et al . Mol Cell Biol (1990) 10:6565-6577). The activation domain at the N-termmus of the insect p53 proteins also exhibits little sequence identity with other p53 family proteins, although the size of this region is roughly the same as that of human p53. Nonetheless, an important feature of this domain is the relative concentration of acidic residues in the insect p53 proteins. Consequently, it is likely that this N-terminal domain of any of the DMp53, CPBp53, and TRIB-Ap53 proteins will similarly exert the functional activity of a transcπptional activation domain to that of the human p53 domain (Thut et al . Science ( 1995) 267 100-104). Interestingly, the DMp53, CPBp53 and TRIB-A p53 proteins do not appear to possess a highly conserved sequence motif. FxxLWxxL. found at the N-termmus of vertebrate and squid p53 family proteins. In the human p53 gene, these conserved residues in this motif participate in a specific interaction between human p53 proteins and mdm2 (Kussie et al , Science (1996) 274 948-953) It is important to note that, although theie is no sequence similanty between the insect p53s and other p53 family members in the C- and N-termini, these regions of p53 contain secondary stiucture characteristic of p53-related proteins For example, the human p53 binds DNA as a homo-tetramer and self-association is mediated by a β-sheet and amphipathic α-hehx located in the C-termmus of the protein A similar β-sheet-turn-α-helix is predicted in the C-terminus of DMp53 Further, the N-termmus of the human p53 is a region that includes a transactivation domain and lesidues critical for binding to the mdm-2 protein. The N-terminus of the DMp53 also include acidic ammo acids and likely functions as a transactivation domain p53 proteins of the invention comprise oi consist of an amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs 2, 4, 6, 8. and 10 or fragments or denvatives thereof. Compositions compnsmg these proteins may consist essentially of the p53 protein, fragments, or derivatives, or may comprise additional components (e g pharmaceutically acceptable earners or excipients. culture media, etc ) p53 piotem derivatives typically share a certain degree of sequence identity or sequence similanty with any one of SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 or fragments thereof. As used herein, "percent (%) amino acid sequence identity" with respect to a subject sequence, or a specified portion of a subject sequence, is defined as the percentage of amino acids in the candidate derivative amino acid sequence identical with the amino acid in the subject sequence (or specified portion thereof), after aligning the sequences and introducing gaps, if necessary to achieve the maximum percent sequence identity, as generated by BLAST (Altschul et al . supra) using the same parameters discussed above for derivative nucleic acid sequences A % amino acid sequence identity value is determined by the number of matching identical amino acids divided by the sequence length for which the percent identity is being reported. "Peicent (%) amino acid sequence similanty " is determined by doing the same calculation as tor determining % amino acid sequence identity, but including consei vative amino acid substitutions in addition to identical ammo acids in the computation A conservative amino acid substitution is one in which an ammo acid is substituted toi another amino acid having similar properties such that the folding or activity of the protein is not significantly affected. Aromatic amino acids that can be substituted for each other are phen\ lalanιne, tryptophan, and tyros e: interchangeable hydrophobic ammo acids are leucine, isoleucine, methionine, and valine: interchangeable polar ammo acids are glutamine and asparagme, interchangeable basic ammo acids argimne, lysine and histidine; interchangeable acidic amino acids aspartic acid and glutamic acid; and interchangeable small ammo acids alanine. senne, cystine. threomne, and glycine In one preferred embodiment, a p53 protein denvative shares at least 50% sequence identity or similanty, preferably at least 60%, 707c . or 80% sequence identity or similanty, more preferably at least 85% sequence similanty or identity, still more preferably at least 90% sequence similarity or identity, and most preferably at least 95% sequence identity or similarity with a contiguous stretch of at least 10 ammo acids, preferably at least 25 am o acids, more preferably at least 40 ammo acids, still more preferably at least 50 amino acids, more preferably at least 100 ammo acids, and in some cases, the entire length of any one of SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8, oi 10. Further prefen-ed derivatives share these % sequence identities with the domains of SEQ ID NOs 2. 4 and 6 listed in Table I above. Additional preferred derivatives comprise a sequence that shares 1007o similanty with any contiguous stretch of at least 10 amino acids, preferably at least 12. more preferably at least 15, and most preferably at least 20 ammo acids of any of SEQ ID NOs 2, 4, 6. 8, and 10, and preferably functional domains thereof. Further preferred fragments compnse at least 7 contiguous amino acids, preferably at least 9, more preferably at least 12, and most preferably at least 17 contiguous amino acids of any of SEQ ID NOs 2. 4, 6. 8, and 10, and preferably functional domains thereof. Other preferred p53 polypeptides, fragments or derivatives consist of or compnse a sequence selected from the group consisting of RICSCPKRD. KICSCPKRD, RVCSCPKRD. KVCSCPKRD, RICTCPKRD. KICTCPKRD. RVCTCPKRD. and KVCTCPKRD (i.e. sequences of the formula: (R or K)(I or V)C(S or T)CPKRD). Additional preferred p53 polypeptides. fragments or derivatives, consist of or comprise a sequence selected from the group consisting of FXCKNSC and FXCQNSC, where X = any amino acid. The fragment or derivative of any of the p53 proteins is preferably "functionally active " meaning that the p53 protein denvative or fragment exhibits one or more functional activities associated with a full-length, ild-type p53 protein compnsmg the amino acid sequence of any of SEQ ID NOs:2. 4. 6. 8, or 10 As one example, a fragment or denvative may have antigenicity such that it can be used in immunoassays. for immunization, for inhibition of p53 activity, etc. as discussed further below regarding generation of antibodies to p53 proteins. Preferably, a functionally active p53 fragment or denvative is one that displays one or more biological activ ities associated with p53 proteins such as regulation of the cell cycle, or transcnption control The functional activity of p53 proteins, denvatives and fragments can be assayed by vanous methods known to one skilled in the art (Current Protocols in Protein Science ( 1998) Co gan et al.. eds.. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Somerset. New Jersey). Example 12 below describes a v anety of suitable assays for assessing p53 function. P 53 denvatives can be produced by v arious methods known in the art. The manipulations which result in their production can occur at the gene or protein level. For example, a cloned p53 gene sequence can be cleaved at appropriate sites with restnction endonuclease(s) (Wells et al., Philos Trans. R. Soc. London SerA (1986) 317:415), followed by further enzymatic modification if desired, isolated, and hgated in vitro, and expressed to produce the desired derivative Alternatively, a p53 gene can be mutated in vitro or in vivo, to create and/or destroy translation, initiation, and/or termination sequences, or to create variations in coding regions and/or to form new restnction endonuclease sites or destroy preexisting ones, to facilitate further in vitro modification. A vanety of mutagenesis techniques are known in the art such as chemical mutagenesis, in vitro site- directed mutagenesis (Carter et al.. Nucl. Acids Res. (1986) 13:4331), use of TAB ® linkers (available from Pharmacia and Upjohn. Kalamazoo, MI), etc. At the protein level, manipulations include post translational modification, e.g. glycosylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, amidation, deπvatization by known protecting/blocking groups, proteolytic cleavage, linkage to an antibody molecule or other cellular hgand, etc. Any of numerous chemical modifications may be earned out by known technique (e.g. specific chemical cleavage bv c anogen bromide, trypsin. chymotrypsin, papain, V8 protease, NaBH 4 , acetylation, form lation, oxidation, reduction, metabolic synthesis in the presence of tunicamycin, etc.) Derivative proteins can also be chemically synthesized by use of a peptide synthesizer, for example to introduce nonclassical amino acids or chemical amino acid analogs as substitutions or additions into the p53 protein sequence. Chimenc or fusion proteins can be made comprising a p53 protein or fragment thereof (preferably compnsmg one or more structural or functional domains of the p53 protein) joined at its N- oi C-termmus via a peptide bond to an amino acid sequence of a different protein. A chimenc product can be made by hgating the appropnate nucleic acid sequences encoding the desired am o acid sequences to each other in the proper coding frame using standard methods and expressing the chimenc product. A chimenc product may also be made by protein synthetic techniques, e.g. by use of a peptide synthesizer. p33 and Rb Proteins The invention also provides ammo acid sequences for Drosophila p33 (SEQ ID NO:20), and Rb (SEQ ID NO:22) tumor suppressors. Denvatives and fragments of these sequences can be prepared as described above for the p53 protein sequences. Preferred fragments and derivatives compnse the same number of contiguous amino acids or same degrees of percent identity or similanty as described above for p53 ammo acid sequences. p53 Gene Regulatory Elements p53 gene regulatory DNA elements, such as enhancers or promoters that reside within the 5 * UTRs of SEQ ID NOs 1. 3. and 5. as shown in Table I above, or within nucleotides 1 - 1225 of SEQ ID NO: 18, can be used to identify tissues, cells, genes and factors that specifically control p53 protein production Preferably at least 20, more preferably at least 25, and most preferably at least 50 contiguous nucleotides within the 5' UTRs are used. Analyzing components that are specific to p53 protein function can lead to an understanding of how to manipulate these regulatory processes, for either pesticide or therapeutic applications, as well as an understanding of how to diagnose dysfunction in these processes. Gene fusions with the p53 regulatory elements can be made. For compact genes that have relatively few and small intervening sequences, such as those descnbed herein for Drosophila, it is typically the case that the regulatory elements that control spatial and temporal expression patterns are found in the DNA immediately upstream of the coding region, extending to the neaiest neighboring gene. Regulatory regions can be used to construct gene fusions where the regulatory DNAs are operably fused to a coding region for a reporter protein whose expression is easily detected, and these constructs are introduced as transgenes into the animal of choice. An entire regulatory DNA region can be used, or the regulatory region can be divided into smaller segments to identify sub-elements that might be specific for controlling expression a given cell type or stage of development. One suitable method to decipher regions containing regulatory sequences is by an in vitro CAT assay (Mercer. Cnt. Rev. Euk. Gene Exp. (1992) 2:251-263, Sambrook et al., supra; and Gorman et al.. Mol. Cell. Biol. ( 1992) 2: 1044- 10 1 ). Additional reporter proteins that can be used for construction of these gene fusions include E. coh beta-galactosidase and green fluorescent protein (GFP) These can be detected readily in situ, and thus are useful for histological studies and can be used to sort cells that express p53 proteins (OKane and Gehnng PNAS ( 1987) 84(24).9123-9127; Chalfie et ai, Science ( 1994) 263:802-805; and Cumberledge and Krasnow ( 1994) Methods in Cell Biology 44- 143-159). Recombmase proteins, such as FLP or ere, can be used in controlling gene expression through site- specific recombination (Golic and Lindquist ( 1989) Cell 59(3):499-509; White et ai. Science ( 1996) 271 :805-807). Toxic proteins such as the reaper and hid cell death proteins, are useful to specifically ablate cells that normally express p53 proteins in order to assess the physiological function of the cells (Kingston. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology ( 1998) Ausubel et al., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. sections 12.0.3-12.10) or any other protein where it is desired to examine the function this particular protein specifically in cells that synthesize p53 proteins. Alternatively, a binary reporter system can be used, similar to that descnbed further below, where the p53 regulatory element is operably fused to the coding region of an exogenous transcnptional activator protein, such as the GAL4 or tTA activators descnbed below, to create a p53 regulatory element "dnv er gene". For the other half of the binary system the exogenous activator controls a separate "target gene" containing a coding region of a reporter protein operably fused to a cognate regulatory element for the exogenous activator protein, such as UAS G or a tTA-response element, respectively. An advantage of a binary system is that a single dnver gene construct can be used to activate transcnption from preconstructed target genes encoding different reporter proteins, each with its own uses as delineated above. p53 regulatory element-reporter gene fusions are also useful for tests of genetic interactions, where the objective is to identify those genes that have a specific role in controlling the expression of p53 genes, or promoting the growth and differentiation of the tissues that expresses the p53 protein. p53 gene regulatory DNA elements are also useful in protein-DNA binding assays to identify gene regulatory proteins that control the expression of p53 genes. The gene regulatory proteins can be detected using a vaπety of methods that probe specific prote -DNA interactions well known to those skilled in the art (Kingston, supra) including in vivo footpπnting assays based on protection of DNA sequences from chemical and enzymatic modification within li ing or permeabilized cells; and in vitro footpnntmg assays based on protection of DNA sequences from chemical or enzymatic modification using protein extracts, nitrocellulose filter-binding assays and gel electrophoresis mobility shift assays using radioactively labeled regulatory DNA elements mixed with protein extracts Candidate p53 gene regulatory proteins can be puπfied using a combination of conventional and DNA-affinitv punfication techniques. Molecular cloning strategies can also be used to identify proteins that specifically bind p53 gene regulatory DNA elements For example, a Drosophila cDNA library in an expression vector, can be screened for cDNAs that encode p53 gene regulatory element DNA-binding activity. Similarly, the yeast "one-hybnd" system can be used (Li and Herskowitz, Science (1993) 262: 1870- 1874; Luo et al . Biotechniques (1996) 20(4) 564-568. Vidal et al, PNAS (1996) 93(19): 10315- 10320) Assays for tumor suppressor genes The p53 tumor suppressor gene encodes a transcnption factor implicated in regulation of cell proliferation, control of the cell cycle, and induction of apoptosis. Vanous expenmental methods may be used to assess the role of the insect p53 genes in each of these areas Transcription activity assays Due to its acidic region, wild type p53 binds both specifically and non-specifically to DNA in order to mediate its function (Zambetti and Levine, supra). Transcnptional regulation by the p53 protein or its fragments may be examined by any method known in the art. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay can be used to charactenze DNA sequences to which p53 binds, and thus can assist in the identification of genes regulated by p53. Bnefly, cells are grown and transfected with vanous amounts of wild type or mutated transcnption factor of interest (in this case, p53), harvested 48 hr after transfection, and lysed to prepare nuclear extracts Preparations of Drosophila nuclear extracts for use in mobility shift assays may be done as descnbed in Dignam et al . Nucleic Acids Res. ( 1983) 11:1475-1489 Additionally, complementary, single-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to target sequences for binding aie synthesized and self-annealed to a final concentration of 10- 15 ng/μl. Double stranded DNA is verified by gel electrophoretic analysis (e.g., on a 77c polyacrylamide gel, by methods known in the art), and end-labeled with 20 μCi [32P] γ-dATP. The nuclear extracts are mixed with the double stranded target sequences under conditions conducive for binding and the results are analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Another suitable method to determine DNA sequences to which p53 binds is by DNA footpnnting (Schmitz et al. Nucleic Acids Reseaich ( 1978) 5-3157-3170). Apoptosis assays A variety of methods may be used to examine apoptosis One method is the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transterase-mediated dιgoxιgenιn- l 1 -dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay which measures the nuclear DNA fragmentation charactenstic of apoptosis (Lazebnik et al. Nature ( 1994) 371.346-347. White et al.. Science (1994) 264:677-683) Additionally, commercial kits can be used for detection of apoptosis (ApoAlert® available from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA). Apoptosis may also be assayed by a vanety of staining methods. Acπdine orange can be used to detect apoptosis in cultured cells (Lucas et al. Blood (1998) 15:4730-41 ) and in intact Drosophila tissues, which can also be stained with Nile Blue (Abrams et al., Development ( 1993) 1 17:29-43). Another assay that can be used to detect DNA laddeπng employs ethidium bromide staining and electophoresis of DNA on an agarose gel (Civielli et al, Int. J. Cancer (1995) 27:673-679: Young. J. Biol. Chem. (1998) 273:25198-25202). Proliferation and cell cycle assays Proliferating cells may be identified by bromodeoxyuπdine (BRDU) incorporation into cells undergoing DNA synthesis and detection by an anti-BRDU antibody (Hoshino et al. Int. J. Cancer (1986) 38:369; Campana et al . J. Immunol. Meth. (1988) 107:79). This assay can be used to reproducibly identify S-phase cells in Drosophila embryos (Edgar and O arrell, Cell (1990) 62:469-480) and imaginal discs (Secombe et al. Genetics (1998) 149: 1867-1882). S-phase DNA syntheses can also be quantified by measunng [Η]- thymidine incorporation using a scintillation counter (Chen. Oncogene (1996) 13:1395-403; Jeoung, J. Biol. Chem. ( 1995) 270: 18367-73). Cell proliferation may be measured by counting samples of a cell population over time, for example using a hemacytometer and Trypan-blue staining. The DNA content and/or mitotic index of the cells may be measured based on the DNA ploidy value of the cell using a variety of methods known in the art such as a propidum iodide assay (Turner et al. Prostate ( 1998) 34: 175-81) or Feulgen staining using a computeπzed microdensitometry staining system (Bacus, Am. J. Pathol.( 1989) 135:783-92). The effect of p53 overexpression or loss-of-function on Drosophila cell proliferation can be assayed in vivo using an assay in which clones of cells with altered gene expression are generated in the developing wing disc of Drosophila (Neufeld et al. Cell (1998) 93: 1 183-93). The clones coexpress GFP. which allows the size and DNA content of the mutant and w ild-type cells from dissociated discs to be compared by FACS analysis. Tumor formation and transformation assays A vanety of in vivo and m vitro tumor formation assays are known in the art that can be used to assay p53 function. Such assays can be used to detect foci formation (Beenken, J. Surg. Res. ( 1992) 52:401 -5), m vitro transformation (Ginsberg, Oncogene. (1991) 6:669-72), tumor formation m nude mice (Endhch, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. ( 1993) 64:715-26). tumor formation in Drosophila (Tao et al, Nat. Genet. ( 1999) 21 : 177- 181 ), and anchorage-independent growth in soft agar (Endhch. supra). Loss of indicia of differentiation may be indicate transformation, including loss of differentiation markers, cell rounding, loss of adhesion, loss of polanty, loss of contact inhibition, loss of anchorage dependence, protease release, increased sugar transport, decreased serum requirement, and expression of fetal antigens Generation and Genetic Analysis of Animals and Cell Lines with Altered Expression of p53 Gene Both genetically modified animal models (i.e. in vivo models), such as C. elegans and Drosophila, and m vitro models such as genetically engineered cell lines expressing or mis-expressing p53 genes, are useful for the functional analysis of these proteins. Model systems that display detectable phenotypes, can be used for the identification and characterization of p53 genes or other genes of interest and/or phenotypes associated with the mutation or mis-expression of p53. The term "mis-expression" as used herein encompasses mis-expression due to gene mutations. Thus, a mis-expressed p53 protein may be one havmg an ammo acid sequence that differs from wild-type (i.e. it is a derivative of the normal protein). A mis-expressed p53 protein may also be one m which one or more N- or C- terminal amino acids have been deleted, and thus is a "fragment " ' of the normal protein. As used herein, "mis-expression " also includes ectopic expression (e.g. by altenng the normal spatial or temporal expression), over-expression (e.g. by multiple gene copies), underexpression, non-expression (e. g. by gene knockout or blocking expression that would otherwise normally occur), and further, expression in ectopic tissues. The in vivo and in vitro models may be genetically engineered or modified so that they 1 ) have deletions and/or insertions of a p53 genes, 2) harbor interfering RNA sequences denved from a p53 gene. 3) have had an endogenous p53 gene mutated (e.g. contain deletions, insertions, rearrangements, or point mutations in the p53 gene), and/or 4) contain transgenes for mis-expression of wild-type or mutant forms of a p53 gene. Such genetically modified ... vivo and m vitro models are useful for identification of genes and proteins that are involved in the synthesis, activation, control, etc. of p53. and also downstream effectors of p53 function, genes regulated by p53, etc. The model systems can be used for testing potential pharmaceutical and pesticidal compounds that interact with p53, for example by administenng the compound to the model system using any suitable method (e _,'. dnect contact, mgestion. injection, etc.) and observing any changes in phenotype, for example defective movement, lethality, etc Vanous genetic engineeπng and expression modification methods which can be used are well-known in the art, including chemical mutagenesis. transposon mutagenesis, antisense RNAi. dsRNAi, and transgene-mediated mis-expression. Generating Loss-of-function Mutations by Mutagenesis Loss-of-function mutations in an insect p53 gene can be generated by any of several mutagenesis methods known in the art (Ashburner. In Drosophila melanogaster: A Laboratory Manual ( 1989), Cold Spring Harbor. NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: pp. 299-418; Fly pushing- The Theory and Practice of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics (1997) Cold Spring Harbor Press, Pla vievv. NY. here aftei "Fly Pushing"). Techniques for producing mutations in a gene or genome include use of radiation ( e.g., X-ray, UV, or gamma ray); chemicals (e g., EMS. MMS. ENU. formaldehyde, etc.); and insertional mutagenesis by mobile elements including dysgenesis induced by transposon insertions, or transposon-mediated deletions, for example, male recombination, as descnbed below. Other methods of altering expression of genes include use of transposons (e.g., P element, EP-type "overexpression trap" element, manner element, piggyBac transposon, hermes, minos, sleeping beauty, etc ) to misexpress genes; antisense: double-stranded RNA interference; peptide and RNA aptamers: directed deletions, homologous recombination; dominant negative alleles. and intrabodies Transposon insertions lying adjacent to a p53 gene can be used to generate deletions of flanking genomic DNA. which if induced in the germl e. are stably propagated in subsequent generations. The utility of this technique in generating deletions has been demonstrated and is well-known in the art One v ersion of the technique using collections of P element transposon induced recessive lethal mutations (P lethals) is particularly suitable for rapid identification of novel, essential genes in Drosophila (Cooley et al. Science (1988) 239: 1121- 1 128; Spraldmg et al . PNAS ( 1995) 92:0824- 10830). Since the sequence of the P elements are known, the genomic sequence flanking each transposon insert is determined either by plasmid rescue (Hamilton et al . PNAS ( 1991 ) 88:2731-2735) or by inverse polymerase chain reaction (Rehm. http7/www fruitfly.org/methods/) A more recent version of the transposon insertion technique in male Drosophila using P elements is known as P-mediated male recombination (Preston and Engels. Genetics ( 1996) 144: 161 1 - 1638). Generating Loss-of-function Phenotypes Using RNA-based Methods p53 genes may be identified and/or charactenzed by generating loss-of- function phenotypes in animals of interest through RNA-based methods, such as antisense RNA (Schubiger and Edgar, Methods in Cell Biology (1994) 44:697-713). One form of the antisense RNA method involves the injection of embryos with an antisense RNA that is partially homologous to the gene of interest (in this case the p53 gene). Another form of the antisense RNA method involves expression of an antisense RNA partially homologous to the gene of interest by operably joining a portion of the gene of interest in the antisense onentation to a powerful promoter that can drive the expression of large quantities of antisense RNA. either generally throughout the animal or in specific tissues. Antisense RNA-generated loss-of-function phenotypes have been reported previously for several Drosophila genes including cactus, pecanex. and Kruppel (LaBonne et al. Dev. Biol. (1989) 136(l ): l-16; Schuh and Jackie. Genome ( 1989) 31 ( 1 ) 422-425; Geisler et α/., Cell (1992) 71(4):6I3-621). Loss-of-function phenotypes can also be generated by cosuppression methods (Bingham, Cell (1997) 90(3):385-387; Smyth. Curr. Biol. (1997) 7(12):793-795; Que and Jorgensen. Dev. Genet. (1998) 22(1): 100- 109). Cosuppression is a phenomenon of reduced gene expression produced by expression or injection of a sense strand RNA corresponding to a partial segment of the gene of interest. Cosuppression effects have been employed extensively in plants and C. elegans to generate loss-of-function phenotypes. Cosuppression in Drosophila has been shown, w here reduced expression of the Adh gene was induced from a white-Adh transgene (Pal-Bhadra et al. Cell ( 1997) 90(3):479-490). Another method for generating loss-of-function phenotypes is by double-stranded RNA interference (dsRNAi). This method is based on the interfering properties of double- stranded RNA derived from the coding regions of gene, and has proven to be of great utility in genetic studies of C. elegans (Fire et al. Nature ( 1998) 391 :806-81 1 ), and can also be used to generate loss-of- function phenotypes in Drosophila (Kennerdell and Carthew, Cell (1998) 95:1017-1026; Misquitta and Patterson PNAS (1999) 96: 1451- 1456). Complementary sense and antisense RNAs derived from a substantial portion of a gene of interest, such as p53 gene, are synthesized m \ itro. annealed in an injection buffer, and introduced into animals by injection or other suitable methods such as by feeding, soaking the animals in a buffer containing the RNA. etc Progeny of the dsRNA treated animals are then inspected for phenotypes of interest (PCT publication no. W099/32619). 2D dsRNAi can also be achieved by causing simultaneous expression in vivo of both sense and antisense RNA from appropnately positioned promoters operably fused to p53 sequences. Alternatively, the living food of an animal can be engineered to express sense and antisense RNA, and then ted to the animal For example, C. elegans can be fed engineered E. coll Drosophila can be fed engineered baker ' s yeast, and insects such as Leptinotarsa and Heliotlus and other plant-eating animals can be fed transgenic plants engineered to produce the dsRNA. RNAi has also been successfully used in cultured Drosophila cells to inhibit expression of targeted proteins (Dixon lab, University of Michigan, http://dixonlab.biochcm.med.umich.edu/piOtocols/RNAiExpenments.html). Thus, cell lines in culture can be manipulated using RNAi both to perturb and study the function of p53 pathway components and to validate the efficacy of therapeutic or pesticidal strategies which involve the manipulation of this pathwav A suitable protocol is described in Example 13. Generating Loss-of-function Phenotypes Using Peptide and RNA Aptamers Another method for generating loss-of-function phenotypes is by the use of peptide aptamers, which are peptides or small polypeptides that act as dominant inhibitors of protein function. Peptide aptamers specifically bind to target proteins, blocking their function ability (Kolon and Finley, PNAS ( 1998) 95: 14266-14271). Due to the highly selective nature of peptide aptamers, they may be used not only to target a specific protein, but also to target specific functions of a given protein (e.g. transcnption function). Further, peptide aptamers may be expressed in a controlled fashion by use of promoters which regulate expression in a temporal, spatial or inducible manner. Peptide aptamers act dominantly; therefore, they can be used to analyze proteins for which loss-of-function mutants are not available. Peptide aptamers that bind with high affinity and specificity to a target protein may be isolated by a vaπety of techniques known in the art. In one method, they are isolated from random peptide hbranes by yeast two-hybnd screens (Xu et al, PNAS (1997) 94: 12473-12478). They can also be isolated from phage libraries (Hoogenboom et al, Immunotechnology ( 1998) 4: 1-20) or chemically generated peptides/hbranes. RNA aptamers are specific RNA ligands for proteins, that can specifically inhibit protein function of the gene (Good et al. Gene Therapy ( 1997) 4-45-54; Ellington, et al. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. ( 1995) 1 : 185-214). In \ itro selection methods can be used to identify RNA aptamers having a selected specificity (Bell et al. J. Biol. Chem. ( 1998) 273: 14309- 14314) It has been demonstrated that RNA aptamers can inhibit protein function Drosophila (Shi et al . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA (19999) 96: 10033-10038). Accordingly, RNA aptamers can be used to decrease the expression of p53 protein or denvative thereol . or a protein that interacts with the p53 protein. Transgenic animals can be generated to test peptide or RNA aptamers in vivo (Kolonin and Finley, supra). For example, transgenic Drosophila lines expressing the desired aptamers may be generated by P element mediated transformation (discussed below). The phenotypes of the progeny expressing the aptamers can then be characteπzed. Generating Loss of Function Phenotypes Using Intrabodies Intracellularly expressed antibodies, or intrabodies, are single-chain antibody molecules designed to specifically bind and inactivate target molecules inside cells. Intrabodies have been used in cell assays and in whole organisms such as Drosophila (Chen et al.. Hum. Gen. Ther. (1994) 5:595-601 ; Hassanzadeh et al. Febs Leu. ( 1998) 16(1, 2):75-80 and 81-86). Inducible expression vectors can be constructed with intrabodies that react specifically with p53 protein. These vectors can be introduced into model organisms and studied m the same manner as descnbed above for aptamers. Transgenesis Typically, transgenic animals are created that contain gene fusions of the coding regions of the p53 gene (from either genomic DNA or cDNA) or genes engineered to encode antisense RNAs, cosuppression RNAs. interfering dsRNA, RNA aptamers, peptide aptamers, or intrabodies operably joined to a specific promoter and transcπptional enhancer whose regulation has been well characterized, preferably heterologous promoters/enhancers (i.e. promoters/enhancers that are non-native to the p53 genes being expressed). Methods are well known for incorporating exogenous nucleic acid sequences into the genome of animals or cultured cells to create transgenic animals or recombinant cell lines. For invertebrate animal models, the most common methods involve the use of transposable elements. There are several suitable transposable elements that can be used to incorporate nucleic acid sequences into the genome of model organisms. Transposable elements are also particularly useful for inserting sequences to a gene of interest so that the encoded protein is not properly expressed, creating a "knock-out " animal having a loss- of-function phenotype. Techniques are well-established for the use of P element in Drosophila (Rubin and Spradl g. Science (1982) 218:348-53; U.S. Pat. No 4,670,388). Additionally, transposable elements that function in a variety of species, have been identified, such as PiggyBac (Thibault et al. Insect Mol Biol ( 1999) 8( 1): 1 19-23), hobo, and hermes. P elements, or marked P elements, are preferred for the isolation of loss-of-function mutations in Drosophila p53 genes because of the precise molecular mapping of these genes, depending on the availability and proximity of preexisting P element insertions for use as a localized transposon source (Hamilton and Zmn. Methods in Cell Biology (1994) 44:81-94; and Wolfner and Goldberg, Methods in Cell Biology ( 1994) 44:33-80). Typically, modified P elements are used which contain one or more elements that allow detection of animals containing the P element. Most often, marker genes are used that affect the eye color of Drosophila. such as denv ati ves of the Drosophila white or rosv genes (Rubm and Spradlmg, supra, and Klemenz et al. Nucleic Acids Res. (1987) 15(10):3947-3959) However, in principle, any gene can be used as a marker that causes a reliable and easily scored phenotypic change in transgenic animals. Vanous other markers include bactenal plasmid sequences having selectable markers such as ampicilhn resistance (Steller and Pirrotta, EMBO J (1985) 4 167-171): and lacZ sequences fused to a weak general promoter to detect the presence of enhancers with a developmental expression pattern of interest (Bellen et ..... Genes Dev. (1989) 3(9): 1288-1300). Other examples of marked P elements useful for mutagenesis have been reported (Nucleic Acids Research (1998) 26:85-88; and httpV/flybase.bio.indiana.edu). A preferred method of transposon mutagenesis in Drosophila employs the "local hopping" method (Tower et al. (Genetics (1993) 133.347-359). Each new P insertion line can be tested moleculai ly for transposition of the P element into the gene of interest (e.g. p53) by assays based on PCR For each reaction, one PCR primer is used that is homologous to sequences contained within the P element and a second pnmer is homologous to the coding region or flanking regions of the gene of interest. Products of the PCR reactions are detected by agarose gel electrophoresis The sizes of the resulting DNA fragments reveal the site of P element insertion relative to the gene of interest. Alternatively. Southern blotting and restnction mapping using DNA probes deπved from genomic DNA or cDNAs of the gene of interest can be used to detect transposition events that rearrange the genomic DNA of the gene P tiansposition events that map to the gene of interest can be assessed for phenotypic effects in heterozygous or homozygous mutant Drosophila. In another embodiment. Drosophila lines carrying P insertions in the gene of interest, can be used to generate localized deletions using known methods (Kaiser. Bioassays ( 1990) 12(6):297-301; Harnessing the power of Drosophila genetics. In Drosophila melanogaster: Practical Uses in Cell and Molecular Biology, Goldstein and Fyrberg, Eds.. Academic Press. Inc. San Diego. California). This is particularly useful if no P element transpositions are found that disrupt the gene of interest. Bπefly, flies containing P elements inserted near the gene of interest are exposed to a further round of transposase to induce excision of the element. Progeny in which the transposon has excised are typically identified by loss of the eye color marker associated with the transposable element. The resulting progeny will include flies with either precise or imprecise excision of the P element, where the imprecise excision events often result in deletion of genomic DNA neighbonng the site of P insertion. Such progenv are screened by molecular techniques to identify deletion events that remove genomic sequence from the gene of interest, and assessed for phenotypic effects in heterozygous and homozygous mutant Drosophila. Recently a transgenesis system has been described that may have universal applicability in all eye-bearing animals and which has been proven effective in deliveπng transgenes to diverse insect species (Berghammer et al. Nature ( 1999) 402:370-371). This system includes: an artificial promoter active in eye tissue of all animal species, preferably containing three Pax6 binding sites positioned upstream of a TATA box (3xP3; Sheng et al. Genes Devel. (1997) 11:1122-1131): a strong and visually detectable marker gene, such as GFP or or other autofluorescent protein genes (Pasher et al, Gene (1992) 111 :229-233; U.S. Pat. No. 5,491,084); and promiscuous vectors capable of dehvenng transgenes to a broad range of animal species, for example transposon-based vectors derived from Hermes, PiggyBcic. or mariner, or vectors based on pantropic VS V(;-pseudotyped retroviruses (Burns et al. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Amm (1996) 32:78-84; Jordan et al, Insect Mol Biol (1998) 7: 215-222: US Pat. No. 5,670,345). Since the same transgenesis system can be used in a vanety of phylogenetically diverse animals, comparative functional studies are greatly facilitated, which is especially helpful in evaluating new applications to pest management. In addition to creating loss-of-function phenotypes. transposable elements can be used to incorporate p53, or fragments or derivatives thereof, as an additional gene into any region of an animal ' s genome resulting in mis-expiession (including over-expression) of the gene. A preferred vector designed specifically for misexpression of genes in transgenic Drosophila. is denved from pGMR (Hay et al. Development ( 1994) 120:2121-2129), is 9Kb long, and contains: an origin of replication for E. coir, an ampicillm resistance gene; P element transposon 3' and 5' ends to mobilize the inserted sequences: a White marker gene; an expression unit compnsmg the TATA region of hsp70 enhancer and the 3 'untranslated region of α-tubuhn gene. The expression unit contains a first multiple cloning site (MCS) designed for insertion of an enhancer and a second MCS located 500 bases downstream, designed for the insertion of a gene of interest. As an alternative to transposable elements. homologous recombination or gene targeting techniques can be used to substitute a heterologous p53 gene or fragment or denvative for one or both copies of the animal's homologous gene. The transgene can be under the regulation of either an exogenous or an endogenous promoter element, and be inserted as either a minigene or a large genomic fragment. Gene function can be analyzed by ectopic expression, using, for example, Drosophila (Brand et al. Methods in Cell Biology ( 1994) 44.635- 654). Examples of well-characterized heterologous promoters that may be used to create transgenic Drosophila include heat shock promoters/enhancers such as the hsp70 and Iιsp83 genes. Eye tissue specific promoters/enhancers include eyeless (Mozer and Benzer, Development (1994) 120: 1049-1058). sevenless (Bowtell et al. PNAS (1991) 88(15):6853- 6857). and g/α.._v-responsιve promoters/enhancers (Qumng et al. Science (1994) 265:785- 789). Wing tissue specific enhancers/promoters can be derived from the dpp or vestigάl genes (Staehhng-Hampton et al. Cell Growth Differ. ( 1994) 5(6):585-593; Kim et al, Nature (1996) 382: 133- 138). Finally, where it is necessary to restrict the activity of dominant active or dominant negative transgenes to regions where p53 is normally active, it may be useful to use endogenous p53 promoters. The ectopic expression of DMp53 in Drosophila larval eye using g/_.....--responsιve enhancer elements is descnbed in Example 12 below. In Drosophila, binary control systems that employ exogenous DNA are useful when testing the mis-expression of genes in a wide v aπety of developmental stage-specific and tissue-specific patterns. Two examples of binary exogenous regulatory systems include the UAS/GAL4 system from yeast (Hay et al. PNAS ( 1997) 94( 10):5195-5200; Ellis et al, Development (1993) 1 19(3):855-865). and the " Tet system" derived from E. coli (Bello et al, Development (1998) 125:2193-2202). The UAS/GAL4 system is a well-established and powerful method of mis-expression which employs the UASo upstream regulatory sequence for control of promoters by the yeast GAL4 transcriptional activator protein (Brand and Pernmon, Development ( 1993) 1 18(2).401-15) In this approach, transgenic Drosophila. termed "target " lines, are generated w here the gene of interest to be mis- expressed is operably fused to an appropnate promoter controlled by UASr,. Other transgenic Drosophila strains, termed "dπver " lines, are generated where the GAL4 coding ^0 region is operably fused to promoters/enhancers that direct the expression of the GAL4 activator protein in specific tissues, such as the eye, wing, nervous system, gut. or musculature. The gene of interest is not expressed in the target lines for lack of a transcπptional activatoi to drive transcnption from the promoter joined to the gene of interest However, when the UAS-target line is crossed with a GAL4 dnver line, mis- expression of the gene of interest is induced in resulting progeny in a specific pattern that is charactenstic for that GAL4 line. The technical simplicity of this approach makes it possible to sample the effects of directed mis-expression of the gene of interest in a wide vanety of tissues by generating one transgenic target line with the gene of interest, and crossing that target line with a panel of pre-existing driver lines. In the "Tet" binary control system, transgenic Drosophila dπver lines are generated where the coding region for a tetracychne-controlled transcriptional activator (tTA) is operably fused to promoters/enhancers that direct the expression of tTA in a tissue-specific and/or developmental stage-specific manner. The driver lines are crossed with transgenic Drosophila target lines where the coding region tor the gene of interest to be mis-expressed is operably fused to a promoter that possesses a tTA-responsive regulatory element. When the resulting progeny are supplied with food supplemented with a sufficient amount of tetracycline, expression of the gene of interest is blocked. Expression of the gene of interest can be induced at will simply by removal of tetracycline from the food. Also, the level of expression of the gene of interest can be adjusted by varying the level of tetracycline in the food. Thus, the use of the Tet system as a binary control mechanism for mis-expression has the advantage of prov iding a means to control the amplitude and timing of mis-expression of the gene of interest, in addition to spatial control Consequently, if a p53 gene has lethal or deleterious effects hen mis-expressed at an eai ly stage in development, such as the embryonic or larval stages, the function of the gene in the adult can still be assessed by adding tetracycline to the food dunng early stages of development and removing tetracycline later so as to induce mis-expression only at the adult stage Dominant negative mutations, by which the mutation causes a protein to interfere with the normal function of a wild-type copy of the protein, and which can result in loss-of- function or reduced-function phenotypes in the presence of a normal copy of the gene, can be made using known methods (Hershkowitz. Nature ( 1987) 329.219-222) In the case of active monomenc proteins, overexpression of an inactive form, achiev ed, for example, by linking the mutant gene to a highly active promoter, can cause competition for natural substrates or hgands sufficient to significantly reduce net activity of the normal protein Alternatively, changes to active site residues can be made to create a virtually irreversible association with a target Assays for Change in Gene Expression Vanous expression analysis techniques may be used to identify genes which are differentially expressed between a cell line or an animal expressing a wild type p53 gene compared to anothei cell line or animal expressing a mutant p53 gene. Such expression profiling techniques include differential display , serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE), transcπpt profiling coupled to a gene database query, nucleic acid array technology, subtractive hybridization, and proteome analysis (e.g. mass-spectrometry and two- dimensional protein gels). Nucleic acid amiy technology may be used to determine the genome-wide expression pattern in a normal animal for comparison with an animal having a mutation in the p53 gene Gene expression profiling can also be used to identify other genes or proteins that may have a functional relation to p53 The genes are identified by detecting changes in their expression levels following mutation, over-expression, under- expression, mis-expression or knock-out, of the p53 gene. Phenotypes Associated With p53 Gene Mutations After isolation of model animals carrying mutated or mis-expressed p53 genes or inhibitory RNAs, animals are carefully examined for phenotypes of interest. For analysis of p53 genes that have been mutated, animal models that are both homozygous and heterozygous for the altered p53 gene are analy zed Examples of specific phenotypes that may be investigated include lethality, steπhty. feeding behavior, tumor formation, perturbations in neuromuscular function including alterations in motihty. and alterations in sensitivity to pharmaceuticals Some phenotypes more specific to flies include alterations in: adult behavior such as. flight ability, walking, grooming, phototaxis. mating or egg- laying: alterations in the responses of sensory organs, changes in the morphology, size or number of adult tissues such as. eyes, wings, legs, bristles, antennae, gut, fat body, gonads, and musculature: larval tissues such as mouth parts, cuticles, internal tissues or imaginal discs; or larval behavior such as feeding, molting, crawling, oi pupaπan formation: or developmental defects in any germhne or embryonic tissues Genomic sequences containing a p53 gene can be used to engineer an existing mutant insect line, using the transgenesis methods previously described, to determine whether the mutation is in the p53 gene. Briefly , germhne transformants are crossed for complementation testing to an existing or newly created panel of insect lines whose mutations have been mapped to the vicinity of the gene of interest (Fly Pushing, supra). If a mutant line is discovered to be rescued by the genomic fragment, as judged by complementation of the mutant phenotype, then the mutant line likely harbors a mutation in the p53 gene. This prediction can be further confirmed by sequencing the p53 gene from the mutant line to identify the lesion in the p53 gene. Identification of Genes That Modify p53 Genes The characterization of new phenotypes created by mutations or misexpression m p53 genes enables one to test for genetic interactions between p53 genes and other genes that may participate in the same, related, or interacting genetic or biochemical pathway(s). Individual genes can be used as starting points in large-scale genetic modifier screens as descnbed in more detail below. Alternatively. RNAi methods can be used to simulate loss- of-function mutations in the genes being analyzed. It is of particular interest to investigate whether there are any interactions of p53 genes with other well-characteπzed genes, particularly genes involved in regulation of the cell cycle or apoptosis. Genetic Modifier Screens A genetic modifier screen using invertebrate model organisms is a particularly preferred method for identifying genes that interact with p53 genes, because large numbers of animals can be systematically screened making it more possible that interacting genes will be identified. In Drosophila. a screen of up to about 10,000 animals is considered to be a pilot-scale screen. Moderate-scale screens usually employ about 10.000 to about 50,000 flies, and large-scale screens employ greater than about 50,000 flies. In a genetic modifier screen, animals having a mutant phenotype due to a mutation in or misexpression of the p53 gene are further mutagenized, for example by chemical mutagenesis or transposon mutagenesis. The procedures involved in typical Drosophila genetic modifier screens are well- known in the art (Wolfner and Goldberg. Methods in Cell Biology (1994) 44.33-80; and Kaπm et al. Genetics ( 1996) 143:315-329). The procedures used differ depending upon the precise nature of the mutant allele being modified. If the mutant allele is genetically recessive, as is commonly the situation for a loss-of-function allele, then most typically males, or in some cases females, which cany one copy of the mutant allele are exposed to an effective mutagen, such as EMS. MMS, ENU. tπethylamine, diepoxyalkanes, ICR-170, formaldehvde. X-ravs, gamma ravs. or ultraviolet radiation. The mutagenized animals are crossed to animals of the opposite sex that also carry the mutant allele to be modified. In the case where the mutant allele being modified is genetically dominant, as is commonly the situation for ectopically expressed genes, wild type males are mutagenized and crossed to females carrying the mutant allele to be modified. The progeny of the mutagenized and crossed flies that exhibit either enhancement or suppression of the oπginai phenotype are presumed to have mutations in other genes, called "modifier genes", that participate in the same phenotype-generating pathway. These progeny are immediately ciossed to adults containing balancer chromosomes and used as founders of a stable genetic line In addition, progeny of the founder adult are retested under the ong al screening conditions to ensure stability and reproducibihty of the phenotype. Additional secondary screens may be employed, as appropnate, to confirm the suitability of each new modifier mutant line for further analysis Standard techniques used for the mapping or modifiers that come from a genetic screen in Drosophila include meiotic mapping v ith visible or molecular genetic markers; male-specific recombination mapping relative to P-element insertions; complementation analysis with deficiencies, duplications, and lethal P-element insertions: and cytological analysis of chromosomal aberrations (Fly Pushing, supra) Genes corresponding to modifier mutations that fail to complement a lethal P-element may be cloned by plasmid rescue of the genomic sequence surrounding that P-element Alternatively, modifier genes may be mapped by phenotype rescue and positional cloning (Sambrook et al. supra). Newly identified modifier mutations can be tested directly for interaction with other genes of interest known to be involved or implicated with p53 genes using methods described above. Also, the new modifier mutations can be tested for interactions with genes in other pathways that are not believed to be related to regulation of cell cycle or apoptosis. New modifier mutations that exhibit specific genetic interactions with other genes implicated in cell cycle regulation or apoptosis. and not with genes in unrelated pathways, are of particular interest. The modifier mutations may also be used to identify "complementation groups". Two modifier mutations are considered to fall within the same complementation group if animals carrying both mutations in trans exhibit essentially the same phenotype as animals that are homozygous tor each mutation individually and, generally are lethal when in trans to each other (Fly Pushing, supra) Generally, individual complementation groups defined in this way correspond to individual genes. When p53 modifier genes are identified, homologous genes in other species can be isolated using procedures based on cross-hybπdization with modifier gene DNA probes, PCR-based strategies with pπmer sequences denved from the modifier genes, and/or computer searches of sequence databases For therapeutic applications related to the function of p53 genes, human and rodent homologs of the modifier genes are of particular interest. Although the above-descnbed Drosophila genetic modifier screens are quite powerful and sensitive, some genes that interact with p53 genes may be missed in this approach, particularly if there is functional redundancy of those genes. This is because the vast majority of the mutations generated in the standard mutagenesis methods will be loss- of-function mutations, whereas gain-of-function mutations that could reveal genes with functional redundancy will be relatively raie Another method of genetic screening in Drosophila has been developed that focuses specifically on systematic gain-of-function genetic screens (Rorth et al. Development (1998) 125: 1049-1057). This method is based on a modular mis-expression system utilizing components of the GAL4/UAS system (descnbed above) where a modified P element, termed an "enhanced P" (EP) element, is genetically engineered to contain a GAL4-responsιve UAS element and promoter. Any other transposons can also be used for this system. The resulting transposon is used to randomly tag genes by sertional mutagenesis (similar to the method of P element mutagenesis descnbed above) Thousands of transgenic Drosophila strains, termed EP lines, can be generated, each containing a specific UAS-tagged gene. This approach takes advantage of the preference of P elements to insert at the 5'-ends of genes. Consequently, many of the genes that are tagged by insertion of EP elements become operably fused to a GAL4-regulated promoter, and increased expression or mis-expression of the randomly tagged gene can be induced by crossing in a GAL4 driver gene. Systematic gain-of-function genetic screens for modifiers of phenotypes induced by mutation or mis-expression of a p53 gene can be performed by crossing several thousand Drosophila EP lines individually mto a genetic background containing a mutant or mis- expressed p53 gene, and further containing an appropπate GAL4 driver transgene. It is also possible to remobilize the EP elements to obtain novel insertions The progeny of these crosses are then analyzed foi enhancement or suppression of the ongmal mutant phenotype as described above Those identified as having mutations that interact with the p53 gene can be tested further to veπfy the reproducibihty and specificity of this genetic interaction. EP insertions that demonstrate a specific genetic interaction with a mutant or mis-expressed p53 gene, have a physically tagged new gene which can be identified and sequenced using PCR or hybridization screening methods, allowing the isolation of the genomic DNA adjacent to the position of the EP element insertion. Identification of Molecules that Interact With p53 A vanety of methods can be used to identify or screen for molecules, such as proteins or other molecules, that interact with p53 protein, or derivatives or fragments thereof. The assays may employ purified p53 protein, or cell lines or a model organism such as Drosophila that has been genetically engineered to express p53 protein. Suitable screening methodologies are well known in the art to test foi proteins and other molecules that interact with a gene/protein of interest (see e.g.. PCT International Publication No. WO 96/34099). The newly identified interacting molecules may provide new targets for pharmaceutical agents. Any of a variety of exogenous molecules, both naturally occurnng and/or synthetic (e.g., libraries of small molecules or peptides, or phage display hbraπes), may be screened for binding capacity. In a typical binding experiment, the p53 protein or fragment is mixed with candidate molecules under conditions conducive to binding, sufficient time is allowed for any binding to occur, and assays are performed to test for bound complexes. A vaπety of assays to find interacting proteins are known in the art. for example, immunoprecipitation with an antibody that binds to the protein in a complex followed by analysis by size fractionation of the immunoprecipitated proteins (e.g. by denatuπng or nondenatuπng polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). Western analysis, non- denatuπng gel electrophoresis, etc Two-hybrid assay systems A preferred method for identifying interacting proteins is a two-hybnd assay system or vanation thereof (Fields and Song, Nature ( 1989) 340:245-246; U.S. Pat. No. 5,283,173; for review see Brent and Finley, Annu. Rev. Genet. ( 1997) 31.663-704). The most commonly used two-hybrid screen system is performed using yeast. All systems share three elements: 1) a gene that directs the synthesis of a "bait " protein fused to a DNA binding domain; 2) one or more "reporter" genes havmg an upstream binding site for the bait, and 3) a gene that directs the synthesis of a "prey " protein fused to an activation domain that activates transcnption of the reporter gene. For the screening of proteins that interact with p53 protein, the "bait " is preferably a p53 protein, expressed as a fusion protein to a DNA binding domain: and the "prey " protein is a protein to be tested for ability to interact with the bait, and is expressed as a fusion protein to a transcnption activation domain. The prey proteins can be obtained from recombinant biological hbraπes expressing random peptides. The bait fusion protein can be constructed using any suitable DNA binding domain, such as the E. coh LexA repressor protein, or the yeast GAL4 protein (Bartel et al, BioTechniques ( 1993) 14:920-924, Chasman et al. Mol. Cell. Biol. ( 1989) 9:4746-4749; Ma et c./.. Cell (1987) 48:847-853; Ptashne et -J. Nature ( 1990) 346:329-331 ). The prey fusion protein can be constructed using any suitable activation domain such as GAL4, VP- 16, etc. The preys may contain useful moieties such as nuclear localization signals (Yhkomi et α/., EMBO J. (1992) 11 :3681 -3694; Dmgwall and Laskey, Trends Biochem. Sci. Trends Biochem. Sci. (1991 ) 16:479-481) or epitope tags (Allen et al. Trends Biochem. Sci. Trends Biochem. Sci. ( 1995) 20.51 1-516) to facilitate isolation of the encoded proteins. Any reporter gene can be used that has a detectable phenotype such as reporter genes that allow cells expressing them to be selected by growth on appropnate medium (e.g. HIS3. LEU2 described by Chien et al. PNAS (1991) 88:9572-9582; and Gyuns et al. Cell (1993) 75:791-803). Other reporter genes, such as LacZ and GFP, allow cells expressing them to be visually screened (Chien et al, supra). Although the preferred host for two-hybπd screening is the yeast, the host cell in which the interaction assay and transcnption of the reporter gene occurs can be any cell, such as mammalian (e.g. monkey, mouse, rat. human, bovine), chicken, bactenal, or insect cells. Various vectors and host strains for expression of the two fusion protein populations in yeast can be used (U.S. Pat. No. 5.468.614: Bartel et al. Cellular Interactions in Development (1993) Hartley, ed.. Practical Approach Series xvin, IRL Press at Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 153-179: and Fields and Sternglanz, Trends In Genetics ( 1994) 10:286-292). As an example of a mammalian system, interaction of activation tagged VP16 derivatives with a GAL4-denved bait dnves expression of reporters that direct the synthesis of hygromycin B phosphotransferase, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. or CD4 cell surface antigen (Fearon et al. PNAS (1992) 89:7958-7962). As another example, interaction of VP16-tagged denvatives with GAL4-deπved baits drives the synthesis of S V40 T antigen, w hich in turn promotes the replication of the prey plasmid. which carries an SV40 origin (Vasavada et al.. PNAS ( 1991) 88: 10686-10690). Typically, the bait p53 gene and the prey library of chimenc genes are combined by mating the two yeast strains on solid or liquid media for a penod of approximately 6-8 hours. The resulting diploids contain both kinds of chimenc genes, i.e., the DNA-bindmg domain fusion and the activation domain fusion Transcnption of the reporter gene can be detected by a linked replication assay in the case of S V40 T antigen (Vasavada et al., supra) or using immunoassay methods (Alam and Cook. Anal Biochem. (1990) 188:245-254). The activation of other reporter genes like URA3. HIS3. LYS2. or LEU2 enables the cells to grow in the absence of uracil. histidine. lysine. or leuc e, respectively, and hence serves as a selectable marker Other types of reporters are monitored by measuπng a detectable signal. For example, GFP and lacZ have gene products that are fluorescent and chromogenic, respectively After interacting proteins have been identified, the DNA sequences encoding the proteins can be isolated. In one method, the activation domain sequences or DNA-binding domain sequences (depending on the prey hybnd used) are amplified, for example, by PCR using pairs of oligonucleotide primers specific for the coding region of the DNA binding domain or activation domain. If a shuttle (yeast to E colt) vector is used to express the fusion proteins, the DNA sequences encoding the proteins can be isolated by transformation of E. coh using the yeast DNA and recovenng the plasmids from E. coll. Alternatively, the yeast vector can be isolated, and the insert encoding the fusion protein subcloned into a bacterial expression vector, for growth of the plasmid in E. coh Antibodies and Immunoassay p53 proteins encoded by any of SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 and denvatives and fragments thereof, such as those discussed above, may be used as an immunogen to generate monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies and antibody fragments or denvatives (e.g. chimenc. single chain, Fab fragments). For example, fragments of a p53 protein, preferably those identified as hydrophihc, are used as immunogens tor antibody production using art- known methods such as by hybndomas. production of monoclonal antibodies in germ-free animals (PCT/US90/02545), the use of human hybridomas (Cole et al.. PNAS (1983) 80:2026-2030; Cole et al, in Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy (1985) Alan R. Liss, pp. 77-96), and production of humanized antibodies (Jones et al, Nature (1986) 321:522-525; U.S. Pat. 5.530, 101) In a particular embodiment, p53 polypeptide fragments provide specific antigens and/or immunogens. especially when coupled to earner proteins. For example, peptides are covalently coupled to keyhole limpet antigen (KLH) and the conjugate is emulsified in Freund ' s complete adjuvant. Laboratory rabbits are immunized according to conventional protocol and bled. The presence of specific antibodies is assayed by solid phase immunosorbent assays using immobilized corresponding polypeptide. Specific activity or function of the antibodies pioduced may be determined by convenient in vitro, cell-based, or in vivo assays e. c? in vitro binding assays, etc Binding affinity may be assayed by determination of equihbnum constants of antigen-antibody association (usually at least about 10 7 M ' , preferably at least about 10 8 M ' . more preferably at least about 10 9 M '). Example 11 below further descπbes the generation of antι-DMp53 antibodies. Immunoassays can be used to identify proteins that interact w ith or bind to p53 protein. Vanous assays are available for testing the ability of a protein to bind to or compete with binding to a wild-type p53 protein or for binding to an antι-p53 protein antibody. Suitable assays include radioimmunoassays, ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay), immunoradiometnc assays, gel diffusion precipitin reactions, immunodiffusion assays, in situ immunoassays (e.g.. using colloidal gold, enzyme or radioisotope labels), western blots, precipitation reactions, agglutination assays (e.g., gel agglutination assays, hemagglutination assays), complement fixation assays, immunofluorescence assays, protein A assays, lmmunoelectrophoresis assays, etc. Identification of Potential Drug Targets Once new p53 genes or p53 interacting genes are identified, they can be assessed as potential drug or pesticide targets using animal models such as Drosophila or other insects, or using cells that express endogenous p53, or that have been engineered to express p53. Assays of Compounds on Insects Potential msecticidal compounds can be administered to insects in a vanety of ways, including orally (including addition to synthetic diet, application to plants or prey to be consumed by the test organism), topically (including spraying, direct application of compound to animal, allowing animal to contact a treated surface), or by injection. Insecticides are typically very hydrophobic molecules and must commonly be dissolved in organic solvents, which are allowed to evaporate in the case of methanol or acetone, or at low concentrations can be included to facilitate uptake (ethanol, dimethyl sulfoxide). The first step in an insect assay is usually the determination of the minimal lethal dose (MLD) on the insects after a chronic exposure to the compounds. The compounds are usually diluted in DMSO. and applied to the food surface bearing 0-48 hour old embryos and larvae. In addition to MLD. this step allows the determination of the fraction of eggs that hatch, behavior of the larvae, such as how they move /feed compared to untreated larvae, the fraction that survive to pupate, and the fraction that eclose (emergence of the adult insect from pupaπum). Based on these results more detailed assays with shorter exposure times may be designed, and larvae might be dissected to look for obvious morphological defects Once the MLD is determined, more specific acute and chronic assays can be designed. In a typical acute assay, compounds are applied to the food surface for embryos, larvae, or adults, and the animals are observed after 2 hours and after an overnight incubation. For application on embryos, defects in development and the percent that survive to adulthood are determined For larvae, defects in behavior, locomotion, and molting may be observed. For application on adults, behavior and neurological defects are observed, and effects on fertility are noted. Any deleterious effect on insect survival, motihty and fertility indicates that the compound has utility in controlling pests. For a chronic exposure assay, adults are placed on vials containing the compounds for 48 hours, then transferred to a clean container and observed for fertility, neurological defects, and death Assay of Compounds using Cell Cultures Compounds that modulate (e.g block or enhance) p53 activity may be tested on cells expressing endogenous normal or mutant p53s. and/or on cells transfected with vectors that express p53, or denvatives or fragments of p53 The compounds are added at varying concentration and their ability to modulate the activity of p53 genes is determined using any of the assays for tumor suppressor genes descnbed above (e.g by measuπng transcnption activity, apoptosis, proliferation/cell cycle, and/or transformation). Compounds that selectively modulate p53 are identified as potential drug candidates having p53 specificity. Identification of small molecules and compounds as potential pharmaceutical compounds from large chemical hbraπes requites high-throughput screening (HTS) methods (Bolger, Drug Discovery Today ( 1999) 4.251-253) Several of the assays mentioned herein can lend themselves to such screening methods. For example, cells or cell lines expressing wild type or mutant p53 protein or its fragments, and a reporter gene can be subjected to compounds of interest, and depending on the reporter genes, interactions can be measured using a variety of methods such as color detection, fluorescence detection (e.g. GFP), autoradiography. scintillation anal sis, etc Agricultural uses of insect p53 sequences Insect p53 genes may be used in controlling agriculturally important pest species. For example, the proteins, genes, and RNAs disclosed herein, or their fragments may have activity in modifying the growth, feeding and or ieproduction of crop-damaging insects, or insect pests of farm animals or of other animals In general, effective pesticides exert a disabling activity on the target pest such as lethality, steπhty, paralysis, blocked development, or cessation of feeding. Such pests include egg, larval, juvenile and adult forms of flies, mosquitos, fleas, moths, beetles, cicadia. grasshoppers, aphids and crickets. The functional analyses of insect p53 genes descnbed herein has revealed roles for these genes and proteins in controlling apoptosis, response to DNA damaging agents, and protection of cells of the germhne. Since overexpression of DMp53 induces apoptosis in Drosophila. the insect p53 genes and proteins in an activated form have application as "cell death" genes which if delivered to or expressed in specific target tissues such as the gut, nervous system, or gonad, would have a use in controlling insect pests. Alternatively, since DMp53 plays a role in response to DNA damaging agents such as X-rays, interference with p53 function in insects has application in sensitizing insects to DNA damaging agents for sterilization. For example, current methods for controlling pest populations through the release of irradiated insects into the environment (Knipl g. J Econ Ent (1955) 48: 459-462; Kniphng (1979) U.S. Dept. Agπc. Handbook No. 512) could be improved by causing expression of dominant negative forms of p53 genes, proteins, or RNAs in insects and most preferably germhne tissue of insects, or by exposing insects to chemical compounds which block p53 function. Mutational analysis of insect p53 proteins may also be used in connection with the control of agnculturally-important pests. In this regard, mutational analysis of insect p53 genes provides a rational approach to determine the precise biological function of this class of proteins in invertebrates. Further, mutational analysis coupled with large-scale systematic genetic modifier screens provides a means to identify and validate other potential pesticide targets that might be constituents of the p53 signaling pathway. Tests for pesticidal activities can be any method known in the art. Pesticides compnsing the nucleic acids of the insect p53 proteins may be prepared in a suitable vector for delivery to a plant or animal. Such vectors include Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid-based vectors for the generation of transgenic plants ( Horsch et al, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1986) 83(8):2571-2575; Fraley et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA ( 1983) 80:4803) or recombinant cauliflower mosaic virus for the incoulation of plant cells or plants (U.S. Pat No. 4.407,956): retrovirus based vectors for the introduction of genes mto vertebrate animals (Burns et al.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA ( 1993) 90-8033-37); and vectors based on transposable elements for incorporation into ln ertebi te animals using vectors and methods already described above. For example, transgenic insects can be generated using a transgene compπsing a p53 gene operably fused to an appropπate inducible promoter, such as a tTA-responsive promoter, in order to direct expression of the tumor suppressor protein at an appropπate time in the life cycle of the insect In this way, one may test efficacy as an insecticide in. for example, the lai v al phase of the life cycle (e.g , when feeding does the greatest damage to crops). Recombinant or synthetic p53 proteins. RNAs or their fragments, in wild-type or mutant forms, can be assayed for msecticidal activity by injection of solutions of p53 proteins or RNAs into the hemolymph of insect larvae (Blackburn, et al, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. ( 1998) 64(8) 3036-41. Bowen and Ensign, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (1998) 64(8):3029-35). Further, transgenic plants that express p53 proteins or RNAs or their fragments can be tested for activity against insect pests (Estruch et al. Nat. Biotechnol. (1997) 15(2): 137-41 ) Insect p53 genes may be used as insect control agents in the form of recombinant viruses that direct the expression of a tumor suppressor gene in the target pest. A vaπety of suitable recombinant virus systems for expression of proteins in infected insect cells are well known in the art. A preferred system uses recombinant baculoviruses. The use of recombinant baculoviruses as a means to engineer expression of toxic proteins in insects, and as insect control agents, has a number of specific advantages including host specificity, environmental safety, the availability of vector systems, and the potential use of the recombinant virus directly as a pesticide without the need for punfication or formulation of the tumor suppressor protein (Cory and Bishop. Mol. Biotechnol. ( 1997) 7(3):303-13; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5.470,735; 5,352.451 , 5. 770, 192, 5.759,809; 5,665,349; and 5,554,592). Thus, recombinant baculoviruses that direct the expression of insect p53 genes can be used for both testing the pesticidal activity of tumor suppressor proteins under controlled laboratory conditions, and as insect control agents in the field. One disadvantage of wild type baculoviruses as insect control agents can be the amount of time between application of the virus and death of the target insect, typically one to two weeks. Dunng this peπod, the insect larvae continue to feed and damage crops Consequently, there is a need to develop improved baculovirus-deπved insect control agents which result in a rapid cessation of feeding of infected target insects. The cell cycle and apoptotic regulatory roles of p53 in vertebrates raises the possibility that expression of tumor suppressor proteins from recombinant baculovirus in infected insects may hav e a desirable effect in controlling metabolism and limiting feeding of insect pests Insect p53 genes. RNAs. proteins or fragments may be formulated with any earner suitable for agncultural use, such as water, organic solvents and/or inorganic solvents. The pesticide composition may be in the form of a solid 01 liquid composition and may be prepared by fundamental formulation processes such as dissolving, mixing, milling, granulating, and dispersing Compositions may contain an insect p53 protein or gene in a mixture with agnculturally acceptable excipients such as vehicles, earners, binders, UV blockers, adhesives. hemecants, thickeners, dispersing agents, preservatives and insect attractants. Thus the compositions of the invention may, for example, be formulated as a solid compπsing the active agent and a finely divided solid carrier. Alternatively, the active agent may be contained in liquid compositions including dispersions, emulsions and suspensions thereof Any suitable final formulation may be used, including for example, granules, powder, bait pellets (a solid composition containing the active agent and an insect attractant or food substance), microcapsules, w ater dispersible granules, emulsions and emulsified concentrates Examples of adjuvant or carπeis suitable for use with the present invention include water, organic solvent, inorganic solvent, talc, pyrophylhte. synthetic fine silica, attapugus clay, kieselguhr chalk, diatomaceous earth, lime, calcium carbonate, bontonite. fuller's earth, cottonseed hulls, wheat flour, soybean flour, pumice, tπpoli, wood flour, walnut shell flour, redwood flour, and lignin. The compositions may also include conventional msecticidal agents and/or may be applied in conjunction with conventional msecticidal agents. EXAMPLES The following examples describe the isolation and cloning of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs 1 , 3, 5. 7. 9, and 18. and how these sequences, denvatives and fragments thereof, and gene products can be used for genetic studies to elucidate mechanisms of the p53 pathway as well as the discovery of potential pharmaceutical agents that interact with the pathway. These Examples are provided merely as illustrative of vanous aspects of the invention and should not be construed to limit the invention in any way. Example 1: Preparation of Drosophila cDNA Library A Drosophila expressed sequence tag (EST) cDNA library as prepared as follows Tissue from mixed stage embryos (0-20 hour), imaginal disks and adult fly heads were collected and total RNA was prepared. Mitochondnal rRNA was removed from the total RNA by hybndization with biotinylated rRNA specific oligonucleotides and the resulting RNA was selected for polyadenylated mRNA The resulting matenal was then used to construct a random pπmed library First strand cDNA synthesis was pπmed using a six nucleotide random pπmer. The first strand cDNA was then tailed with terminal transferase to add approximately 15 dGTP molecules The second strand was pnmed using a pnmer which contained a Notl site followed by a 13 nucleotide C-tail to hvbndize to the G-tailed first strand cDNA The double stranded cDNA was hgated with BstXl adaptors and digested with Notl . The cDNA was then fractionated by size by electrophoresis on an agarose gel and the cDNA greater than 700 bp was puπfied. The cDNA was hgated with Notl, BstXl digested pCDNA-sk+ vector (a denvative of pBluescnpt. Stratagene) and used to transform E. coh (XLlblue) The final complexity of the library was 6 X 10 6 independent clones. The cDNA library was normalized using a modification of the method descnbed by Bonaldo et al. (Genome Research ( 1996) 6 791 -806) Biotinylated driver as prepared from the cDNA by PCR amplification of the inserts and allowed to hvbndize with single stranded plasmids of the same library. The resulting double-stranded forms were removed using strepavidm magnetic beads, the remaining single stranded plasmids were converted to double stranded molecules using Sequenase (Amersham. Arlington Hills. IL), and the plasmid DNA stored at -20°C prior to transformation. Aliquots of the normalized plasmid library were used to transform E. coli (XLlblue or DH10B), plated at moderate density, and the colonies picked into a 384-well master plate containing bactenal growth media using a Qbot robot (Genetix, Chnstchurch, UK). The clones were allowed to grow for 24 hours at 37° C then the master plates were frozen at -80° C for storage. The total number of colonies picked for sequencing from the normalized library was 240,000 The master plates were used to inoculate media for growth and preparation of DNA for use as template in sequencing reactions. The reactions were pnmanly earned out with pπmer that initiated at the 5' end of the cDNA inserts. However, a minor percentage of the clones were also sequenced from the 3' end. Clones were selected for 3 ' end sequencing based on either further biological interest or the selection of clones that could extend assemblies of contiguous sequences ("contigs") as discussed below DNA sequencing was earned out using ABI377 automated sequencers and used either ABI FS, dirhodamine or BigDye chemistries (Applied Biosystems, Inc.. Foster City . CA) Analysis of sequences was done as follows the traces generated by the automated sequencers were base-called using the program 'Phred " (Gordon, Genome Res. (1998) 8:195-202), which also assigned quality values to each base. The resulting sequences were tπmmed for quality in view of the assigned scoies. Vector sequences were also removed Each sequence was compared to all other fly EST sequences using the BLAST program and a filter to identify regions of near 1007c identity Sequences with potential overlap were then assembled into contigs using the programs "Phrap". "Phred " and "Consed" (Phil Green, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; http://bozeman.mbt.washmgton.edu/phrap.docs/phrap.html ) The resulting assemblies were then compared to existing public databases and homology to known proteins was then used to direct translation of the consensus sequence Where no BLAST homology was available, the statistically most likely translation based on codon and hexanucleotide preference was used. The Pfam (Bateman et al. Nucleic Acids Res (1999) 27.260-262) and Prosite (Hofmann et al. Nucleic Acids Res. (1999) 27(1 ) 215-219) collections of protein domains were used to identify motifs in the resulting translations The contig sequences were archived in an Oracle-based relational database (FlyTag™, Exehxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., South San Francisco, CA). Example 2: Other cDNA libraries A Leptinotarsa (Colorado Potato Beetle) library was prepared using the Lambda ZAP cDNA cloning kit from Stratagene (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, cat#200450), following manufacturer ' s protocols. The original cDNA used to construct the library was ohgo-dt pπmed using mRNA from mixed stage larvae Leptinotarsa. A Tribohum library was made using pSPORT cDNA library construction system (Life Technologies. Gaithersburg, MD), follow ing manufactuier ' s protocols. The original cDNA used to construct the library was ohgo-dt pπmed using mRNA from adult Tribohum. Example 3: Cloning of the p53 nucleic acid from Drosophila (DMp53) The TBLASTN program (Altschul et al . supra) was used to query the FlyTag™ database with a squid p53 protein sequence (GenBank gi: 1244762), chosen because the squid sequence was one of only two members of the p53 family that had been identified previously from an invertebrate. The results rev ealed a single sequence contig, which was 960 bp in length and which exhibited highly si gnificant homology to squid p53 (score=192, P=5.1x l0 l2 ) Further analysis of this sequence w ith the BLASTX program against GenBank protein sequences demonstrated that this contig exhibited significant homology to the entire know n family of p53-hke sequences in v ertebrates, and that it contained coding sequences homologous to the p53 family that encompassed essentially all of the DNA- binding domain, which is the most conserved region of the p53 protein family. Inspection of this contig indicated that it was an incomplete cDNA, missing coding regions C-termmal to the presumptive DNA-bindmg domain as well as the 3' untranslated region of the mRNA. The full-length cDNA clone was produced by Rapid Amplification of cDNA ends (RACE: Frohman et al., PNAS ( 1988) 85:8998-9002). A RACE-ready library was generated from Clontech (Palo Alto. CA) Drosophila embryo poly A + RNA (Cat#694-I) using Clontech's Marathon cDNA amplification kit (Cat# K1802), and following manufacturer ' s directions. The following pnmers were used on the library to retπeve full- length clones: 3'373 CCATGCTGAAGCAATAACCACCGATG SEQ ID NO: 11 3'510 GGAACACACGCAAATTAAGTGGTTGGATGG SEQ ID NO: 12 3'566 TGATTTTGACAGCGGACCACGGG SEQ ID NO:13 3799 GGAAGTTTCTTTTCGCCCGATACACGAG SEQ ID NO: 14 5'164 GGCACAAAGAAAGCACTGATTCCGAGG SEQ ID NO: 15 5'300 GGAATCTGATGCAGTTCAGCCAGCAATC SEQ ID NO: 16 5'932 GGATCGCATCCAAGACGAACGCC SEQ ID NO: 17 RACE reactions to obtain additional 5' and 3' sequence of the Drosophila p53 cDNA were performed as follows. Each RACE reaction contained: 40 μl of H 0, 5 μl of lOXAdvantage PCR buffer (Clontech), 1 μl of specific p53 RACE primer at 10 μM, 1 μl of API pπmer (from Clontech Marathon kit) at 10 μM. 1 μl of cDNA, 1 μl of dNTPs at 5 mM, 1 μl of Advantage DNA polymerase (Clontech). For 5' RACE, the reactions contained either the 3'373. 3'510. 3'566. or 3799 pnmers. For 3' RACE, the reactions contained either the 5' 164 or 5'300 pnmers. The reaction mixtures were subjected to the following thermocyclmg program steps for touchdown PCR: ( 1) 94°C 1 min, (2) 94°C 0.5 mm, (3) 72°C 4 min. (4) repeat steps 2-3 four times, (5) 94°C 0.5 mm, (6) 70°C 4 min, (7) repeat steps 5-6 four times, (8) 94°C 0.33 mm. (9) 68°C 4 mm, (10) repeat steps 8-9 24 times. ( 1 1 ) 68°C 4 min. ( 12) remain at 4°C. Products of the RACE reactions were analyzed by gel electrophoresis. Discrete DNA species of the following sizes were observed in the RACE products produced with each of the following pnmers: 3'373, approx 400 bp: 3'510. approx. 550 bp, 3'566, approx. 600 bp: 3799. approx. 850 bp; 5'164. approx. 1400 bp. 5'300 approx. 1300 bp. The RACE DNA products were cloned directly into the vector pCR2.1 using the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad. California) following the manufacturers directions. Colonies of transformed E. co were picked for each construct, and plasmid DNA prepared using a QIAGEN tip 20 kit (QIAGEN, Valencia. California) Sequences of the RACE cDNA inserts in within each clone were determined using standard protocols for the BigDye sequencing reagents (Applied Biosystems, Inc. Foster City, California) and either M13 reverse or BιgT7 pnmers for pnming from flanking vector sequences, or 5"932 or 3373 pnmers (descnbed above) for pnming internally from Drosophila p53 cDNA sequences. The products were analyzed using ABI 377 DNA sequencer. Sequences were assembled into a contig using the Sequencher program (Gene Codes Corporation), and contained a single open reading frame encoding a predicted protein of 385 amino acids, which compared favorably with the known lengths of vertebrate p53 proteins, 363 to 396 amino acids (Soussi et al, Oncogene (1990) 5 945-952) Analysis of the predicted Drosophila p53 protein using the BLASTP homology searching program and the GenBank database confirmed that this protein was a member of the p53 family, since it exhibited highly significant homology to all known p53 related proteins, but no significant homology to other protein families. Example 4: Cloning of p53 Nucleic Acid Sequences from other insects The PCR conditions used for cloning the p53 nucleic acid sequences compnsed a denaturation step of 94° C, 5 m : followed by 35 cycles of. 94° C 1 min, 55° C 1 min 72° C 1 min; then, a final extension at 72° C 10 m All DNA sequencing reactions were performed using standard protocols for the BigDye sequencing reagents (Applied Biosystems, Inc.) and products were analyzed using ABI 377 DNA sequencers. Trace data obtained from the ABI 377 DNA sequencers as analyzed and assembled into contigs using the Phred-Phrap programs. The DMp53 DNA and protein sequences were used to query sequences from Tribohum, Leptinotarsa, and Heliotlus cDNA hbranes using the BLAST computer program, and the results revealed several candidate cDNA clones that might encode p53 related sequences. For each candidate p53 cDNA clone, well-separated, single colonies were streaked on a plate and end-sequenced to veπfy the clones Single colonies were picked and the plasmid DNA was purified using Qiagen REAL Preps (Qiagen, Inc.. Valencia, CA). Samples were then digested ith appropriate enzymes to excise insert from vector and determine size For example, the vector pOT2, (www.fruitfly.org/EST/pOT2vector.html) can be excised with Xhol/EcoRI; or pBluescπpt (Stratagene) can be excised with BssH II. Clones were then sequenced using a combination of pnmer walking and in vitro transposon tagging strategies. For pnmer walking, pnmers were designed to the known DNA sequences in the clones, using the Pπmer-3 software (Steve Rozen. Helen J. Skaletsky (1998) Pnmer3. Code available at http://www-genome vvi mit.edu/genome_software/other/pnmer3.html.). These primers were then used in sequencing reactions to extend the sequence until the full sequence of the insert was determined. The GPS-1 Genome Priming System in vitro transposon kit (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, MA) was used for transposon-based sequencing, following manufacturer ' s protocols. Bπefly, multiple DNA templates w ith randomly interspersed pnmer-bmding sites were generated. These clones were prepaied by picking 24 colonies/clone into a Qiagen REAL Prep to purify DNA and sequenced by using supplied pnmers to perform bidirectional sequencing from both ends of transposon insertion. Sequences were then assembled using Phred Phrap and analyzed using Consed. Ambiguities in the sequence were resolved by resequencing several clones. This effort resulted in several contiguous nucleotide sequences For Leptinotarsa, a contig was assembled of 2601 bases in length, encompassing an open reading frame (ORF) of 1059 nucleotides encoding a predicted protein of 353 ammo acids. The ORF extends from base 121-1180 of SEQ ID NO 3 For Tribohum, a contig was assembled of 1292 bases in length, encompassing an ORF of 1050 nucleotides, extending from base 95- 1 145 of SEQ ID NO:5, and encoding a predicted protein of 350 amino acids The analysis of another candidate Tribolium p53 clone also generated a second contig of 509 bases in length, encompassing a partial ORF of 509 nucleotides (SEQ ID NO. 7). and encoding a partial protein of 170 amino acids. For Heliotlus. a contig was assembled of 434 bases in length, encompassing a partial ORF of 434 nucleotides (SEQ ID NO:9). and encoding a partial protein of 145 amino acids. Example 5: Northern Blot analysis of DMp53 Northern blot analysis using standard methods was performed using three different poly(A)+ mRNA preparations, 0- 12 h embryo. 12-24 h embi yo, and adult, which were fractionated on an agarose gel along with size standards and blotted to a nylon membrane. A DNA fragment containing the entire Drosophila p53 coding region was excised by Hindi digestion, separated by electrophoresis in an agarose gel, extracted from the gel, and 12 P-labeled by random-pnming using the Redipπme labeling system (Amersham. Piscataway, NJ) Hybndization of the labeled probe to the mRNA blot was performed overnight. The blot was washed at high stnngency (0.2x SSC/0.1% SDS at 65°C) and mRNA species that specifically hybndized to the probe were detected by autoradiography using X-ray film The results showed a single cross-hybπdizing mRNA species of approximately 1 6 kilobases in all three mRNA sources. This data was consistent with the observed sizes of the 5' and 3' RACE products descnbed above Example 6: Cvtogenetic mapping of the DMp53 gene It was of interest to identify the map location of the DMp53 gene in order to determine whether any existing Drosophila mutants correspond to mutations in the DMp53 gene, as well as for engineenng new mutations within this gene. The cytogenetic location of the DMp53 gene was determined by in situ hybndization to polytene chromosomes (Pardue, Meth Cell Biol (1994) 44.333-351) following the protocol outlined below (steps A-C). (A) Preparation of polytene chromosome squashes: Dissected salivary glands were placed into a drop of 45% acetic acid Glands ere transferred to drop of 1 :2:3 mixture of lactic acid: wateπacetic acid. Glands were then squashed between a cover slip and a slide and incubated at 4°C overnight. Squashes wei e frozen in liquid N 2 and the covershp removed. Slides were then immediately immei sed in 70% ethanol for 10 min. and then air dried. Slides were then heat treated f or 30 mm at 68°C in 2x SSC buffer. Squashes were then dehydrated by treatment with 707c ethanol for 10 mm. followed by 957o ethanol for 5 min. (B) Preparation of a biotinylated hybndization probe, a solution was prepared by mixing: 50 μl of 1 M Tns-HCl pH 7.5, 6.35 μl of 1 M MgCl 2 , 0.85 μl of beta- mercaptoethanol, 0.625 μl of 100 mM dATP, 0 625 μl of 100 mM dCTP, 0.625 μl of 100 mM dGTP, 125 μl of 2 M HEPES pH 6.6, and 75 μl of 10 mg/ml pd(N) 6 (Pharmacia, Kalamazoo. MI). 10 μl of this solution was then mixed with 2 μl 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 33 μl containing (0.5 μg) DMp53 cD\ A fragment denatured by quick boiling, 5 μl of 1 mM bιotιn-16-dUTP (Boehπnger Mannheim. Indianapolis, IN), and 1 μl of Klenow DNA polymerase (2 U) (Boehπnger Mannheim ) The mixture was incubated at room temperature overnight and the following components were then added: 1 μl of 1 mg/ml sonicated denatured salmon sperm DNA, 5.5 ul 3 M sodium acetate pH 5 2. and 150 μl ethanol (100%) After mixing the solution was stored at -70°C for 1-2 hr. DNA precipitate was collected by centrifugation in a microcentnfuge and the pellet was washed once in 70% ethanol, dπed in a vacuum, dissolved in 50 μl TE buffer, and stored at -20°C. (C) Hybndization and staining was performed as follows: 20 μl of the probe added to a hybndization solution (112.5 μl tormamide: 25 μl 20x SSC, pH 7.0; 50 μl 50% dextran sulfate; 62.5 μl distilled H 2 0) was placed on the squash. A covershp (22 mm 2 ) was placed on the squash and sealed with rubber cement and placed on the airtight moist chamber overnight at 42°C Rubbei cement was removed by pealing off cement, then covershp removed m 2x SSC buffer at 37°C Slides were washed twice 15 min each in 2x SSC buffer at 37°C. Slides were then washed twice 15 mm each in PBS buffer at room temperature. A mixture of the following ''Elite" solution was prepared by mixing: 1 ml of PBT buffer (PBS buffer with 0.17c Tween 20), 10 μl of Vectastain A (Vector Laboratories. Burlingame, CA), and 10 μl of Vectastain B (Vector Laboratones) The mixture was then allowed to incubate for 30 min. 50 μl of the Elite solution was added to the slide then drained off. 75 μl ofthe Elite solution was added to slide and a covershp was placed onto the slide. The slide was incubated in moist chamber 1.5-2 hr at 37°C The covershp was then removed in PBS buffer, and the slide was washed twice 10 min each in PBS buffer. A fresh solution of DAB (diammobenzid e) in PBT buffer was made by mixing 1 μl of 0.3% hydrogen peroxide with 40 μl 0.5 mg/ml DAB solution. 40 μl of the DAB/peroxide solution was then placed onto each slide. A covershp was placed onto the slide and incubated 2 mm Slides were then examined under a phase microscope and reaction was stopped in PBS buffer when signal was determined to be satisfactory. Slides were then πnsed in running H 2 0 for 10 min. and air dπed. Finally, slides were inspected under a compound microscope to assign a chromosomal location to the hybridization signal. A single clear region of hybridization was observed on the polytene chromosome squashes which was assigned to cytogenetic bands 94D2-6. Example 7: Isolation and sequence analysis of a genomic clone for the DMp53 gene PCR was used to generate DNA probes for identification of genomic clones containing the DMp53 gene. Each reaction (50 μl total volume) contained 100 ng Drosophila genomic DNA, 2.5 μM each dNTP. 1 5 mM MgCL, 2 μM of each primer, and 1 μl of TAKARA exTaq DNA polymerase (PanVera Corp., Madison, WI) Reactions were set up with pnmer pair 5'164 & 3'510 (descnbed above), and thermocycling conditions used were as follows (where 0 0 indicates time in mmutes'seconds)- initial denaturation of 94°C, 2 00, followed by 10 cycles of 94°C, 0.30, 58°C 0.30. 68°C, 4.00: followed by 20 cycles of 94°C. 0 30, 55°C, 0 30, 68°C. 4 00 + 0:20 per cycle PCR products were then fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis, ' " P-labeled by nick translation, and hybridized to nylon membranes containing high-density arrayed PI clones from the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (University of California, Beikeley, and purchased from Genome Systems, Inc.. St. Louis, MO) Four positive PI clones were identified: DS01201, DS02942. DS05102. and DS06254. and each clone was veπtied using a PCR assay with the pnmer pair descnbed above To prepaie DNA foi sequencing. E. coh containing each PI clone was streaked to single colonies on LB agar plates containing 25 μg ml kanamycin, and grown overnight at 37°C Well-separated colonies for each PI clone were picked and used to inoculate 250 ml LB medium containing 25 μg/ml kanamycin and cultures were grown for 16 hours at 37°C with shaking Bacterial cells were collected by centnfugation, and DNA purified with a Qiagen Maxi-Prep System kit (QIAGEN, Inc.. Valencia, California). Genomic DNA sequence from the PI clones was obtained using a strategy that combined shotgun and directed sequencing of a small insert plasmid DNA library denved from the PI clone DNAs (Ruddy et al. Genome Research (1997) 7:441-456). All DNA sequencing and analysis were performed as descibed befoie, and PI sequence contigs were analyzed using the BLAST sequence homology searching programs to identify those that contained the DMp53 gene or other coding regions. This analysis demonstrated that the DMp53 gene was divided into 8 exons and 7 introns. In addition, the BLAST analysis indicated the presence of two additional genes that flank the DMp53 gene; one exhibited homology to a human gene implicated in nephropathic cystmosis (labeled CTNS-hke gene) and the second gene exhibited homology to a large family of oxidoreductases. Thus, we could operationally define the limits of the DMp53 gene as an 8,805 bp corresponding the DNA region lying between the putative CTNS-hke and oxidoreductase-hke genes. Example 8: Analysis of p53 Nucleic Acid Sequences Upon completion of cloning, the sequences were analyzed using the Pfam and Prosite programs, and by visual analysis and compaπson with other p53 sequences. Regions of cDNA encoding the vanous domains of SEQ ID Nos 1-6 are depicted in Table I above. Additionally, Pfam predicted p53 similarity regions tor the partial TRIB-Bp53 at ammo acid residues 1 18- 165 (SEQ ID N0 8) encoded by nucleotides 354-495 (SEQ ID NO:7). and for the partial HELIOp53 at amino acid residues 105-138 (SEQ ID NO: 10) encoded by nucleotides 315-414 (SEQ ID NO * 9) Nucleotide and amino acid sequences tor each of the p53 nucleic acid sequences and their encoded proteins were searched against all available nucleotide and amino acid sequences in the public databases, usmg BLAST (Altschul et al . supra) Tables 2-6 below summanze the results The 5 most similar sequences are listed for each p53 gene. TABLE 2 - DMp53 D 4803651=CAA72225 P73 splice vanant [Cercopithecus aethiops] 2370177=CAA72219 first splice variant [Homo sapiens] TABLE 4 - TRIB-Ap53 BLAST analysis using each of the p53 ammo acid sequences to find the number of amino acid residues as the shortest stretch of contiguous novel amino acids with respect to published sequences indicate the following: 7 amino acid residues for DMp53 and for TRIB-Ap53, 6 amino acid residues for CPBp53, and 5 amino acid residues for TRIB-Bp53 and HELIOp53. BLAST results for each of the p53 ammo acid sequences to find the number of amino acid residues as the shortest stretch of contiguous ammo acids for which there are no sequences contained within public database sharing 1007c sequence similanty indicate the following: 9 ammo acid residues for DMp53. CPBp5, TRIB-Ap53, and TRIB-Bp53, and 6 amino acid residues for HELIOp53. Example 9: Drosophila genetics Fly culture and crosses were performed according to standard procedures at 22-25°C (Ashburner, supra). Gl-DMp53 overexpression constructs were made by cloning a Bell Hindi fragment spanning the DMp53 open reading frame mto a vector (pExPress) containing glass multiple repeats upstream of a minimal heat shock promoter. The pExPress vector is an adapted version of the pGMR vector (Hay et al.. Development ( 1994) 120:2121-2129) which contains an alpha tubul 3' UTR for increased protein stabilization and a modified multiple cloning site. Standard P-element mediated germ line transformation was used to generate transgenic lines containing these constructs (Rubin and Spradlmg, supra). For X-nτadιatιon expeπments. third instar larvae in vials were exposed to 4,000 Rads of X-rays using a Faxitron X-ray cabinet system (Wheeling, IL). Example 10: Whole-mount RNA in situ hybridization. TUNEL, and Immunocvtochemistrv In situ hybndization was performed using standard methods (Tautz and Pfeifle, Chromosoma ( 1989) 98-81-85). DMp53 anti-sense RNA probe was generated by digesting DMp53 cDNA with EcoR l and transcπbing with T7 RNA polymerase. For lmmunocytochemistry, third instar larval eye and wing discs were dissected in PBS, fixed in 2% formaldehyde for 30 minutes at room temperature, permeabilized in PBS+0.5% Tπton tor 15 minutes at room temperature, blocked in PBS+5% goat serum, and incubated with pnmary antibody for two hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Anti- phospho-histone staining used Anti-phospho-histone H3 Mitosis Marker (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid. NY) at a L500 dilution Antι-DMp53 monoclonal antibody staining used hybndoma supernatant diluted 1 2 Goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies conjugated to FITC oi Texas Red (Jackson Immunoresearch. West Grove, PA) were used at a 1 200 dilution Antibodies were diluted in PBS+5% goat serum. TUNEL assay was performed by usmg the Apoptag Direct kit (Oncoi . Gaithersburg. MD) per manufacturer ' s protocol with a 0 5% Tnton/PBS peimeabihzation step. Discs were mounted in anti-fade reagent (Molecular Probes. Eugene, OR) and images were obtained on a Leica confocal microscope BrDU staining was performed as descnbed (de Nooij et al.. Cell. (1996)87(7): 1237- 1247) and images were obtained on an Axioplan microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Example 11: Generation of anti-DMp53 antibodies Antι-DMp53 rabbit polyclonal (Josman Labs, Napa, CA) and mouse monoclonal antibodies (Antibody Solutions Inc . Palo Alto, CA) were generated by standard methods using a full-length DMp53 protein fused to glutathione-S-transferase (GST-DMp53) as antigen. Inclusion bodies of GST-DMp53 were purified by centnfugation using B-PER buffer (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and injected subcutaneously mto rabbits and mice for immunization. The final boost for mouse monoclonal antibody production used intravenous injection of soluble GST-DMp53 produced by solubihzation of GST-DMp53 in 6M GuHCl and dialysis into phosphate buffer containing IM NaCl. Hybridoma supematants were screened by ELISA using a soluble 6XHIS-tagged DMp53 protein bound to Ni-NTA coated plates (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and an anti-mouse IgG Fc-fragment specific secondary antibody. Example 12: Functional analysis The goal of this seπes of expenments was to compare and contrast the functions of the insect p53s to those of the human p53 The DMp53 was chosen to carry out this set of expenments, although any of the other insect p53s could be used as well p53 involvement in the cell death pathway To determine whether DMp53 can serve the same functions in vivo as human p53, DMp53 was ectopically expressed in Drosophila larval eye discs using glass -responsive enhancer elements The glass-DMp53 (gl-DMp53) transgene expresses DMp53 in all cells postenor to the morphogenetic furrow. Dunng eye development, the morphogenetic furrow sweeps from the postenor to the antenor of the eye disc Thus, gl-DMp53 larvae express DMp53 in a field of cells which expands from the posterior to the antenor of the eye disc dunng larval development. Adult flies carrying the gl-DMp53 transgene ere viable but had small, rough eyes with fused ommatidia (any of the numerous elements of the compound eye). TUNEL staining of gl-DMp53 eye discs showed that this phenotype was due, at least in part, to widespread apoptosis in cells expressing DMp53 Results were confirmed by the detection of apoptotic cells with acndine orange and Nile Blue TUNEL-positive cells appeared within 15-25 cell diameters of the furrow. Given that the fuirow moves approximately 10 cell diameters per hour, this indicated that the cells became apoptotic 2-3 hours after DMp53 was expressed. Surpπsingly, co-expression of the baculovirus cell death inhibitor p35 did not block the cell death induced by DMp53 (Miller, J Cell Physiol (1997) 173(2): 178-182; Ohtsubo et al, Nippon Rinsho ( 1996) 54(7)' 1907-1911). However, DMp53-ιnduced apoptosis and the rough-eye phenotype in gl-DMp53 flies could be suppressed by co-expression of the human cycl -dependent-kinase inhibitor p21. Because p21 overexpression blocks cells in the GI phase of the cell cycle, this finding suggests that transit through the cell cycle sensitizes cells to DMp53-ιnduced apoptosis. A similar effect of p21 overexpression on human p53-ιnduced apoptosis has been described p53 involvement in the cell cycle In addition to its ability to affect cell death pathways, mammalian p53 can induce cell cycle arrest at the G I and G2/M checkpoints In the Drosophila eye disc, the second mitotic wave is a synchronous, final wave of cell division posterior to the morphogenetic furrow. This unique aspect of development provides a means to assay for similar effects of DMp53 on the cell. The transition of cells from GI to S phase can be detected by BrdU incorporation. Eye discs dissected from wild-type third instai larvae displayed a tight band of BrdU-staining cells corresponding to DNA replication in the cells of the second mitotic wave. This transition from G I to S phase was unaffected by DMp53 overexpression from the gl-DMp53 transgene In contrast, expression of human p21 or a Drosophila homologue, dacapo (de Nooij et .J. Cell ( 1996) 87(7): 1237- 1247; Lane et al, Cell ( 1996) 87(7): 1225- 1235), under control of g/. -responsive enhancer elements completely blocked DNA replication in the second mitotic wave In mammalian cells, p53 induces a cell cycle block in GI through transcnptional activation of the p21 gene These results suggest that this function is not conserved in DMp53 In wild-type eye discs, the second mitotic wave typically forms a distinct band of cells that stain with an anti-phospho-histone antibody In g/-DMp53 larval eye discs, this band of cells was significantly broader and more diffuse, suggesting that DMp53 alters the entry into and or duration of M phase p53 response to DNA damage The following expenments were performed to determine whether loss of DMp53 function affected apoptosis or cell cycle arrest m response to DNA damage In order to examine the phenotype of tissues deficient in DMp53 function, dominant-negative alleles of DMp53 w ere generated These mutations are analogous to the R175H (R155H in DMp53) and H179N (H159N DMp53) mutations in human p53. These mutations in human p53 act as dominant-negative alleles, presumably because they cannot bind DNA but retain a functional tetrameπzation domain Co-expression of DMp53 R155H with wild-type DMp53 suppressed the rough eye phenotype that normally results from wild type DMp53 overexpression, confirming that this mutant acts as a dominant- negative allele in vivo Unlike wild type DMp53, overexpression of DMp53 R155H or H159N using the glass enhancer did not produce a visible phenotype, although subtle alterations in the bπstles of the eye were revealed by scanning electron microscopy In mammalian systems, p53-mduced apoptosis plays a crucial role in preventing the propagation of damaged DNA DNA damage also leads to apoptosis in Drosophila To determine if this response requires the action of DMp53, dominant-negative DMp53 was expressed in the posterior compartment of the w ing disc Following X-irradiation, wing discs were dissected TUNEL staining ievealed apoptotic cells and antι-DMp53 antibody revealed the expression pattern of dominant-negative DMp53 Four hours after X- liradiation, wild type third instar larval wing discs showed widespread apoptosis When the dominant-negative allele of DMp53 was expressed in the postenor compartment of the wing disc, apoptosis was blocked in the cells expressing DMp53 Thus, induction of apoptosis following X-irradiation requnes the function of DMp53 This pro-apoptotic role for DMp53 appears to be limited to a specific response to cellular damage, because developmentally piogrammed cell death in the eye and other tissues is unaffected by expression of eithei dominant-negative DMp53 allele The requirement for DMp53 in the apoptotic response to X-irradiation suggests that DMp53 may be activated by DNA damage. In mammals, p53 is activated pnmanly by stabilization of p53 protein. Although DMp53 function is required for X-ray induced apoptosis, it does not appear to be necessary for the cell cycle arrest induced by the same dose of irradiation. In the absence of irradiation, a random pattern of mitosis was observed in 3rd star wing discs of Drosophila. Upon irradiation, a cell cycle block occured in wild-type discs as evidenced by a significant decrease in anti-phospho-histone staining. The cell cycle block was unaffected by expression of dominant-negative DMp53 in the postenor of the wing disc. Several time points after X-irradiation were examined and all gave similar results, suggesting that both the onset and maintenance of the X-ray induced cell cycle arrest is independent of DMp53. p53 in normal development Similar to p53 in mice, DMp53 does not appear to be required for development because widespread expression of dominant-negative DMp53 in Drosophila had no significant effects on appearance, viability, or fertility. Interestingly, in situ hybndization of developing embryos revealed widespread early embryonic expression that became restricted to pπmordial germ cells in later embryonic stages. This expression pattern may indicate a crucial role for DMp53 in protecting the germ line, similar to the proposed role of mammalian p53 in protection against teratogens Example 13: p53 RNAi experiments in cell culture Stable Drosophila S2 cell lines expressing hemaglut in epitope (HA) tagged p53, or vector control under the inducible metallothionen promoter were produced by transfection using pMT/V5-Hιs (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Induction of DMp53 expression by addition of copper to the medium resulted in cell death via apoptosis. Apoptosis was measured by three different methods: a cell proliferation assay; FACS analysis of the cell population in which dead cells were detected by their contracted nuclei; and a DNA ladder assay. The ability to use RNAi in S2 cell lines allowed p53 regulation and function to be explored using this inducible cell-based p53 expression system. Preparation of the dsRNA template: PCR pnmers containing an upstream T7 RNA polymerase binding site and downstream DMp53 gene sequences were designed such that sequences extending from nucleotides 128 to 1 138 of the DMp53 cDNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: l) could be amplified in a manner that would allow the generation of a DMp53-denved dsRNA PCR reactions were performed using EXPAND High Fidelity (Boehnnger Mannheim. Indianapolis, IN) and the products were then punfied. DMp53 RNA was generated from the PCR template using the Promega Large Scale RNA Production System (Madison. WI) following manufacturer ' s protocols. Ethanol precipitation of RNA was performed and the RNA was annealed by a first incubation at 68°C for 10 min, followed by a second incubation at 37°C for 30 mm. The resulting dsRNA was stored at -80°C. RNAi experiment in tissue culture: RNAi was performed essentially as descnbed previously On day 1 , cultures of Drosophila S2 cells were obtained that expressed pMT-HA-DMp53 expression plasmid and either 15 μg of DMp53 dsRNA or no RNA was added to the medium. On the second day, CuSO was added to final concentrations of either 0, 7, 70 or 700 μM to all cultures. On the fourth day. an alamarBlue (Alamar Biosciences Inc., Sacramento, CA) staining assay was performed to measure the number of live cells in each culture, by measuring fluorescence at 590 nm. At 7μM CuS0 4 , there was no change in cell number from 0 μM CuS0 4 for RNAi treated or untreated cells. At 70 μM CuS0 there was no change in cell number from 0 μM CuS0 for the RNAi-treated category. However, the number of cells that were not treated with RNAi dropped by 307o. At 700 μM CuS0 4 . the number of cells that were treated with RNAi dropped by 307c (as compared with OμM CuS0 4 ), while the number of cells that were not treated with RNAi dropped by 70% These expenments showed that p53 dsRNA rescued at least 707c of the cells in the p53 inducible category, since some cell loss might be attnbutable to copper toxicity. Results of these expenments demonstrate that DMp53 dsRNA rescues cells from apoptosis caused by inducing DMp53 overexpression. Thus, this expenmental cell-based system represents a defined and unique way to study the mechanisms of p53 function and regulation.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS 1. An isolated nucleic acid molecule compnsmg a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of (a) a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a polypeptide compnsmg at least 7 contiguous amino acids of any one of SEQ ID NOs 4, 6, 8. and 10. (b) a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a polypeptide compnsmg at least 7 contiguous ammo acids of SEQ ID NO.2. wherem the isolated nucleic acid molecule is less than 15kb in size; (c) a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a polypeptide compnsmg at least 9 contiguous amino acids that share 1007c sequence similarity with 9 contiguous amino acids of any one of SEQ ID NOs 4. 6, 8, and 10, (d) a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a polypeptide compnsmg at least 9 contiguous amino acids that share 1007o sequence similanty with 9 contiguous amino acids of SEQ ID NO 2, where the isolated nucleic acid molecule is less than 15kb in size; (e) at least 20 contiguous nucleotides of any of nucleotides 1-111 of SEQ ID NO: 1, 1-120 of SEQ ID NO.3, 1-93 of SEQ ID NO:5, and 1-1225 of SEQ ID NO: 18; (f) a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence similanty with a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:20 and SEQ ID NO:22: and (g) the complement of the nucleic acid of any of (a)-(f). 2 The isolated nucleic acid molecule of Claim 1 that is RNA. 3. The isolated nucleic acid molecule of Claim 1 wherem the nucleic acid sequence has at least 507c sequence identity with a sequence selected from the group consisting of any of SEQ ID NOs: l, 3, 5, 7, 9, 18, 19 and 21 4. The isolated nucleic acid molecule of Claim 1 wherein the nucleic acid sequence encodes a polypeptide compπsing an ammo acid sequence selected from the group consisting of: RICSCPKRD, KICSCPKRD. RVCSCPKRD. KVCSCPKRD, RICTCPKRD. KICTCPKRD, RVCTCPKRD. KVCTCPKRD. FXCKNSC and FXCQNSC, wherein X is any amino acid 5. The isolated nucleic acid molecule of Claim 1 wherein the nucleic acid sequence encodes at least 17 contiguous amino acids of any of SEQ ID NOs 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. 6. The isolated nucleic acid molecule of Claim 1 wherem the nucleic acid sequence encodes a polypeptide comprising at least 19 ammo acids that share 100% sequence similanty with 19 amino acids of any of SEQ ID NOs 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 7. The isolated nucleic acid molecule of Claim 1 wherein the nucleic acid sequence encodes a polypeptide having at least 50% sequence identity with any of SEQ ED NOs 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. 8. The isolated nucleic acid molecule of Claim 1 w herein the nucleic acid sequence encodes at least one p53 domain selected from the group consisting of an activation domain, a DNA binding domain, a linker domain, an ohgomenzation domain, and a basic regulatory domain. 9. The isolated nucleic acid molecule of Claim 1 wherein the nucleic acid sequence encodes a constitutively active p53. 10. The isolated nucleic acid molecule of Claim 1 wherein the nucleic acid sequence encodes a dominant negative p53. 11. A vector compnsmg the nucleic acid molecule of Claim 1. 12. A host cell compπsing the vector of Claim 1 1. 13. A process for producing a p53 polypeptide compπsing cultunng the host cell of Claim 8 under conditions suitable for expression of the p53 polypeptide and recovering the polypeptide. 14. A purified polypeptide compπsing an ammo acid sequence selected from the group consisting of: a) at least 7 contiguous amino acids of any one of SEQ ID NOs 2, 4. 6, 8, and 10; b) at least 9 contiguous ammo acids that share 1007c sequence similanty with at least 9 contiguous amino acids of any one of SEQ ID NOs 2, 4. 6, 8, and 10; and c) at least 10 contiguous amino acids of a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO 20 and SEQ ID NO:22. 15 The punfied polypeptide of Claim 14 wherem the amino acid sequence is selected from the group consisting of RICSCPKRD, KICSCPKRD. RVCSCPKRD, KVCSCPKRD. RICTCPKRD. KICTCPKRD, RVCTCPKRD, KVCTCPKRD, FXCKNSC and FXCQNSC, wherein X is any amino acid. 16. The purified polypeptide of Claim 14 wherein the amino acid sequence has at least 50% sequence similarity with a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs 2. 4, 6, 8, and 10. 17. A method for detecting a candidate compound or molecule that modulates p53 activity said method compnsmg contacting a p53 polypeptide, or a nucleic acid encoding the p53 polypeptide, with one or more candidate compounds or molecules, and detecting any interaction between the candidate compound or molecule and the p53 polypeptide or nucleic acid; wherein the p53 polypeptide compnses an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of. a) at least 7 contiguous amino acids of any one of SEQ ID NOs 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10; and b) at least 9 contiguous ammo acids that share 1007c sequence similanty with at least 9 contiguous ammo acids of any one of SEQ ID NOs 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. 18. The method of Claim 17 where the candidate compound or molecule is a putative pharmaceutical agent. 19. The method of Claim 17 wherein the contacting comprises admmisteπng the candidate compound or molecule to cultured host cells that have been genetically engineered to express the p53 protein. 20 The method of Claim 17 wherein the contacting compnses admmistenng the candidate compound or molecule to an insect has been genetically engineered to express the p53 protein. 21. The method of Claim 20 wherem the candidate compound is a putative pesticide. 22. A first insect that has been genetically modified to express or mis-express a p53 protein, or the progeny of the insect that has inheπted the p53 protein expression or mis-expression, wherein the p53 protein compπses an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of: a) at least 7 contiguous amino acids of any one of SEQ ID NOs 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10; and b) at least 9 contiguous amino acids that share 1007c sequence similarity with at least 9 contiguous ammo acids of any one of SEQ ID NOs 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. 23. The insect of Claim 22 wherein said insect is Drosophila that has been genetically modified to express a dominant negative p53 having a mutation selected from the group consisting of R155H, H159N, and R266T. 24. A method for studying p53 activity comprising detecting the phenotype caused by the expression or mis-expression of the p53 protein in the first insect of Claim 22. 25. The method of Claim 24 additionally comprising observing a second insect having the same genetic modification as the first insect which causes the expression or mis-expression of the p53 protein, and wherein the second animal additionally compnses a mutation in a gene of interest, wherein differences, if any, between the phenotype of the first animal and the phenotype of the second animal identifies the gene of interest as capable of modifying the function of the gene encoding the p53 protein. 26. The method of Claim 24 additionally compnsmg administering one or more candidate compounds or molecules to the insect or its progeny and observing any changes in p53 activity of the insect or its progeny. 27 A method of modulating p53 activity compnsmg contacting an insect cell with the isolated nucleic acid molecule of claim 1 , wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule is dsRNA denved from a coding region of a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO. l , 3, 5, 7, and 9. 28. The method of Claim 27 wherein cultured insect cells are contacted with the dsRNA and apoptosis of the cultured cells is assayed

Inventors: BUCHMAN ANDREW ROY, DEMSKY MADELYN ROBIN, FRIEDMAN LORI, KEEGAN KEVIN PATRICK, KOPCZYNSKI CASEY, LARSON JEFFREY S, OLLMAN MICHAEL MARTIN, PLATT DARREN MARK, ROBERTSON STEPHANIE A, YOUNG LYNN MARIE, BUCHMAN, ANDREW, ROY, DEMSKY, MADELYN, ROBIN, FRIEDMAN, LORI, KEEGAN, KEVIN, PATRICK, KOPCZYNSKI, CASEY, LARSON, JEFFREY, S., OLLMAN, MICHAEL, MARTIN, PLATT, DARREN, MARK, ROBERTSON, STEPHANIE, A., YOUNG, LYNN, MARIE
Applicants: EXELIXIS INC, EXELIXIS, INC.
Application year: 2000
Main classification: C07H21
IPC codes: A01K67, C07K14, C12N1, C12N5, C12N15, C12P21, C12Q1, G01N33