ENZYME COMPOSITIONS AND THEIR USE AS CATALYSTS

Abstract: An enzyme-mediated reaction process, to which is added a material that forms a matrix within which the reaction can occur.

Description: ENZYME COMPOSITIONS AND THEIR USE AS CATALYSTS Field of the Invention This invention relates to enzyme compositions and their use as catalysts. Background of the Invention Desired enantiomers of chiral chemicals are in most cases synthesised most conveniently by the use of biocatalysts such as enzymes. Enzyme-catalysed reactions have not been universally adopted by the pharmaceutical or chemical industries, since in a large number of cases the reactions have proved difficult to scale up. This is particularly true where the reaction involves a catalytic process in which the reaction must take place in an organic solvent. Processes in organic solvents have many advantages, for the chemistry, downstream processing, and often for the catalysis itself. However, enzyme catalysis in solvents can cause considerable reduction in the activity of the enzyme and reduce the speed of the process to an unusable or uneconomic level. Reactions catalysed by enzymes in solvents also tend to be physically unstable, especially where water has to be added as a substrate for a hydrolytic reaction. Such reactions can lead to the flocculation of the enzyme, precipitation, and irreversible cessation of the catalytic process. Enzyme reactions in aqueous solution can be potentiated by the addition of various chemicals. These may include surfactants, salts, phospholipids and lipid micelles; see, for example, Hebb era/, Biochem. Pharmac. (1975) 24:1007-12, Mann ef a/, Biochem. Pharmac. (1975) 24: 1013-17, and Mann, J. Neurochem. (1978) 31:747-9. Similarly, inhibitory substances may be removed from a reaction medium by the presence of various materials. An obvious example is the removal of acid products of the reaction using simple buffers. The use of salts or other materials in this manner would appear not to be possible with an unrefined catalyst in organic solvents. However, this is one situation where there is a particular need for activation of the catalyst and the removal of any inhibitory processes. Enzyme-catalysed reaction are often substrate-dependent, and may be inhibited by the product. Thus, although high conversion may be desirable, it cannot be achieved because the substrate and/or product concentration must be kept low. The use of diluents to reduce or distribute the activity of an enzyme is well- established; for example, enzymes may be spray-dried on bran or another, similar material. Similarly, dehydrated enzymes may be prepared for use in organic synthesis in solvents by freeze-drying; this process can be costly. Summary of the Invention The present invention is based on the realisation that, e.g. in the case where an enzymatic reaction requires the presence of water and is conducted in organic solvent, and water bound to the enzyme should be sufficient to allow the catalytic reaction to proceed, the enzyme has to be used in excess merely to accommodate the water required for the hydrolytic reaction. This invention addresses such a problem by the addition of a material capable of forming a matrix and thereby retaining additional water in the proximity of the enzyme. More generally, the material can form a matrix within which the reaction can occur, or retain a substrate (which includes the possibility of more than one substrate) for reaction. Thus, the invention describes a mean of formulating an enzyme that solves many of the problems that occur with enzyme-catalysed reactions in organic solvents. This solution to the problems of biocatalysis in solvents is flexible, and other materials such as surfactants and salts may, as appropriate, be added to the formulation to achieve the desired improvements in the catalytic process. The formulation therefore has the effect of making enzymatic catalysis in solvents robust, while preserving or enhancing the enzyme's activity, increasing stability, and facilitating the manipulation of the enzyme's immediate environment. In particular, in the case of hydrolytic reactions, the matrix-forming material provides a reservoir of water to act as a substrate in the reaction. The invention also has the advantages of economy and, because it is protected, longer utility for the enzyme. Description of the Invention For the purposes of this specification, the term "enzyme" is used to include both conventional enzymes, e.g. based on proteins and amino acids, and mimetics thereof; the "enzyme" should thus have the capability of catalysing the conversion of a primary substrate to a product (a secondary substrate, e.g. water, will usually also be involved). By way of example, the process may be hydrolytic, in which case the enzyme may be, for example, a lipase or protease. It may also be non-hydrolytic, e.g. using glucose dehydrogenase as the enzyme. Other enzymes that may be used are oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases, lyases, isomerases and ligases. This invention utilises materials or "diluents" capable of maintaining a natural or an artificial environment around the enzyme catalyst. It is exemplified by the use, especially, of carbohydrate-containing polysaccharidessuchasdextrins, cyclodextrins and poly-galacturonans. Other materials such as proteins, surfactants, lipids and phospholipids may be used, but in each case the effect is to produce an environment around the catalyst that permits the catalyst to be robust within the reaction and to be manipulated so that maximal activity may be obtained. More specifically, and has now been demonstrated, by way of illustration, the efficiency of the reaction and the enzyme's activity in organic solvents can be increased by the use of specific materials. These materials may be considered diluents in that the activity of the enzyme is lowered within the formulation. Nevertheless, in organic solvents, the enzyme may demonstrate increased overall activity together with a considerable increase in efficiency and economic effectiveness. Such diluents are typified by polysaccharides of sufficient length to produce a framework or matrix wherein the enzyme may function. This matrix effectively protects the enzyme from the dehydrating and denaturing effects of the solvent and provides an environment which can be manipulated, to maximise the enzyme's effect. In hydrolytic reactions, the matrix itself holds the water to be used as a substrate and becomes the channel by means of which water is conducted to the enzyme for the hydrolytic reaction. This prevents water being withdrawn from that natural pool of water that lies within the enzyme protein and which is required for enzyme stability and conformation. It thus increases and prolongs the enzyme's efficiency. The economic viability of any process designed using such formulations is thereby enhanced. The matrix-forming material will typically be polymeric, e.g. having a degree of polymerisation (DP) of between 10 and 400. Proteins have the necessary characteristics. The water content of proteins may, however, be quite limited, and they are generally less preferred. Short-chain polysaccharides such as sucrose, trehalose and lactose may be used, but better results are obtained, in most cases, by using polysaccharides having a DP of greater than 10 carbohydrate units. A suitable example is dextrin or dextran of sufficient polymerisation. For the purposes of illustration, a simple dextrin containing little water-soluble material will be used. The formulation may be prepared in a number of ways, but adequate results may be obtained by mixing the dextrin with enzyme until a homogeneous blend is obtained. For a hydrolytic process, the diluted enzyme is placed in the organic medium or solvent, including substrate, and then hydrated by careful addition of water. For a non-hydrolytic process, only a small amount of water (if any) may need to be added. The enzyme protein forms a matrix or latticework with the dextrin. Small amounts of water hold this enzyme-dextrin matrix together during the reaction. This matrix is not only a physical support for the enzyme but, in the case of hydrolytic processes (e.g. using a lipase or protease), the carbohydrate itself becomes a co- substrate in that it is the matrix that supplies the water as a substrate for the reaction. Thus, there may be two components of the system capable of holding water for the catalytic process; these are the enzyme protein and the dextrin. In a hydrolytic reaction, it can be assumed that there is a continuum and a dynamic relationship between the two pools of water. Water can pass from one to the other as the hydrolytic reaction proceeds. Such hydrolytic reactions remove water from the enzyme's active centre only to be replenished from another pool. The provision of water is however not the sole benefit or function of the matrix. Thus, the matrix may effectively support the enzyme in the organic phase in which the primary substrate (i.e. a substrate other than water) is dissolved. In this manner, the substrate moves through the matrix and is presented to the enzyme in an environment where sufficient water, but often no more, is present for the catalytic reaction. The maintenance of the matrix is therefore crucial to the successful completion of any reaction. It is this physical relationship between the enzyme and, say, dextrin, that provides the physical robustness to the catalytic process and provides a "framework" in which other materials that can potentiate the catalytic reaction may be added. Reactions that are not hydrolytic may also be supported in this way. In some cases, there may be sufficient water, even in freeze-dried enzymes, to support the matrix. In others, small amounts of water may need to be added. To create the most preferred matrix or latticework using a polysaccharide, it is desirable that the degree of polymerisation of the polysaccharide or dextrin should exceed 10. It has been found that, in the most effective dextrins, more than 60% of the dextrin has a DP lying between 10 and 350, with little soluble material. In the construction of a successful matrix, the amount of water can, in theory, be determined empirically. In practice, however, since enzymes may themselves vary in their ability to absorb water, the amount of dextrin and water needed to achieve a stable matrix, in any position, is probably best achieved by experimentation. This can readily be done by the skilled person. For reactions of a hydrophobic nature, non-hydratable matrix formers may have to be used. In this case, only those very small amounts of water remaining within the enzyme will add to preserve enzyme functionality. It is unlikely that significant amounts of water will then need to be added, and could even be detrimental. It should be understood that, despite appropriate formulation, there remains the possibility that the matrix will not remain stable throughout the reaction. The reason for this becomes clear when one considers that there is one further parameter in any successful hydrolytic reaction, i.e. the concentration of the substrate. Since in any hydrolytic reaction it is the concentration of the substrate that determines the amount of water that is taken from the matrix, the demand for water may become too great. In such cases, as the reaction proceeds, it will take sufficiently large amounts of water from the matrix so that the matrix becomes unstable and collapses. This is likely to prevent the reaction going to completion and result in inefficient conversion of the substrates. Equally, too much water may be added, which cannot be absorbed by the formulation, in which case a greater amount of dextrin is required to prevent coagulation of the enzyme formulation. Therefore, with any preblended enzyme, it may be necessary to modify the formulation by adding additional amounts of either or both dextrin and water, to satisfy the requirements of the formulation for the intended reaction. The use of the formulated product gives an opportunity, therefore, while optimising the reaction protocol, to maximise the concentration of the substrate (chemical) concentration in the organic solvent. This is a major cost factor in the synthesis of chemicals and drugs. Raising the concentration of the substrate alone is sufficient in many cases to render a potential process economical and desirable. Within the matrix, the enzyme exists primarily in a form protected by the matrix from undesirable effects of the solvent. The introduction of additional materials, in addition to or instead of water, which may enhance the catalytic reactions, is now possible. More generally, it is possible to add a component that potentiates the enzyme-mediated reaction, the component being relatively compatible with the enzyme and/or the material, and relatively incompatible with the reaction medium. By way of example, in an organic medium, salts, in particular water-soluble salts, e.g. salts containing sodium, potassium, calcium, ammonium or phosphate ions, can be added. Surfactant is another example of a suitable additive. There is ample evidence that such additions to an enzyme protein in an aqueous environment, and the matrix may be considered as such, can add to both the enzyme's activity and its efficiency. Other suitable additional materials that can be added, to ensure further activity, include those that remove inhibitory substances or unwanted products. Thus, particular features of the invention provided by the use of a matrix- forming polysaccharide, protein, or similar material, are: to formulate the enzyme and thereby enhance catalytic efficiency, protect the enzyme, and introduce both robustness and flexibility of manipulation into the process; while providing support, to act as a co-substrate by providing water for hydrolytic reactions; and to increase the efficiency of non-hydrolytic reactions by stabilising the enzyme, increase the maximal substrate concentration, and physically support the enzyme, which will, in turn, allow further manipulation of the enzyme's environment to maximise efficiency. The following Examples illustrate the invention. Example 1 Bioresolution The resolution of the racemic starting enol acetate, to give enol ester and ketone, was conducted in the presence of butanol, using the lipase enzyme from Candida rugosa. In water, there was no resolution; a yield of 100% ketone was obtained. In order to illustrate the invention, the enol acetate (0.64 mmol) was dissolved in 9.0 ml toluene, and the enzyme or enzyme plus dextrin (in a 6:1 ratio) was then added and thoroughly mixed. The second substrate (n-butanol) was then added and the reaction was monitored as it proceeded over approximately the next 3-4 hours. 52% Ketone and 48% enol acetate were recovered. The ee of the enol acetate was found to be 68% in favour of the (S) form. Without the added dextrin, a yield of 88% ketone was obtained, with the same ee in favour of the (S)-acetate. In summary, this Example shows that the desired (S)-acetate is obtained in a yield of 0% in water, 8.2% in toluene without dextrin, and 32.6% in toluene with dextrin. Example 2 A racemic mixture of a pharmaceutical precursor is resolved, when the same lipase as in Example 1 is used to hydrolyse one of a pair of enantiomers containing a halogen at a chiral centre, thus releasing a halogenic acid. The original reaction was subject to considerable problems on scaling up, both chemically, physically and in terms of efficiency. A dilution of the enzyme with dextrin produced excellent results in terms of recovery and ee while producing a stable and reproducible process, capable of scale-up. Further evidence of the utility of the invention is provided by Griebenow et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1999) 121:8157-63. This paper demonstrates that an enzyme, when freeze-dried in the presence of cyclodextrin, exhibits improved activity and enantioselectivity. A number of advantages were noted in a rrøns-esterification reaction with subtilisin cariesberg in an organic solvent. The authors claim that the improved ee is related to the preservation and "intactness" of the enzyme structure, while the increases in activity are achieved by the increased mobility of the enzyme structure. It should be noted that, for the purposes of the present invention, freeze- drying is unnecessary.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. An enzyme-mediated reaction process, to which is added a material that forms a matrix within which the reaction can occur. 2. An enzyme-mediated process, to which is added a material that forms a matrix within which a substrate can be retained in proximity to the enzyme. 3. A process according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the material is hydrophobic. 4. A process according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the material is hydrophilic. 5. A process according to claim 2 and claim 4, wherein the substrate is water. 6. A process according to claim 5, wherein the material, when normally hydrated in water, has a viscosity of greater than 75 cps. 7. A process according to claim 5 or claim 6, wherein the material, when the composition of enzyme and material is hydrated, provides a physical support for the enzyme. 8. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein the material has a degree of polymerisation of between 10 and 400. 9. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein the material is a polysaccharide. 10. A process according to claim 9, wherein the polysaccharide is a dextrin. 11. A process according to any preceding claim, which is conducted in an organic medium. 12. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein the process is hydrolytic. 13. A process according to claim 12, wherein the enzyme is a lipase or protease. 14. A process according to any of claims 1 to 11 , wherein the process is non- hydrolytic. 15. A process according to claim 14, wherein the enzyme is glucose dehydrogenase. 16. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein the enzyme is selected from oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases, lyases, isomerases and ligases. 17. A process according to any preceding claim, which additionally comprises adding a component that potentiates the enzyme-mediated reaction, the component being relatively compatible with the enzyme and/or the material, and relatively incompatible with the reaction medium. 18. A process according to claim 17, wherein said component is a salt. 19. An active enzyme-containing formulation which comprises the enzyme and also a material as defined in any of claims 1 to 10. 20. A formulation according to claim 19, which additionally comprises a component as defined in claim 17 or claim 18.

Inventors: MANN STEPHEN PHILIP, MANN, STEPHEN, PHILIP
Applicants: EUROPA BIOPRODUCTS LTD, MANN STEPHEN PHILIP, EUROPA BIOPRODUCTS LTD., MANN, STEPHEN, PHILIP
Application year: 2000
Main classification: C12N11
IPC codes: C12N9, C12N11, C12P1, C12P41