OPALESCENT FILLERS FOR DENTAL RESTORATIVE COMPOSITES

Abstract: There is provided a resin-containing dental composite including a dispersed phase, reinforcing, translucent filler having about 25-80 % by volume of the filler particles in the particle size range from about 0.2 mu m to about 0.6 mu m whereby the composite has a self-opalescing quality. Without the addition of opalescence-imparting pigments, a dental restorative composite is provided that displays opalescence to the visible eye, which gives the restoration the appearance of a vital, natural tooth. Preferably, the refractive indices of the resin and the translucent filler are the same or subtantially similar, both advantageously being within the range of 1.45-1.60. Further, to prevent the opal effect from being masked, the dental restorative composite advantageously comprises less than 0.0021 % by weight yellow hue pigments such that the composite formulation is relatively colorless.

Description: OPALESCENT FILLERS FOR DENTAL RESTORATIVE COMPOSITES Field of the Invention The piesent invention is generally related to a composite resin mateπal used for dental restoration, and more particularly to a universal composite resin material suitable for all dental restorations incorporating a self-opalescing translucent filler Background ot the Im ention In dentistry, practitioners use a variety of restorative materials to create crowns, veneers, direct fillings, inlays, onlays and splints One of the major goals in restorative dentistry is to produce restorations that match the esthetics of the natural tooth Highly esthetic tooth colored restorations were first introduced to dentistry in the 1940's with aciy c lesins and silicate cements These were direct filling restorations that were tooth colored and translucent in visible light like natural teeth When placed in the mouth, the fillings were not easily discernible from the tooth itself In the 1950's, dental porcelains were introduced, which provided a variety of shades and translucencies to furthei improve the esthetics of the restorations These were used in restorations, such as porcelain fused to metal crowns and bridges, or in inlays, onlays and veneers Tooth shading with porcelain restorations has been highly successful and has become state-of-art in the industry today In the 1970's. fluorescence was incorporated into dental porcelains which further improved the esthetics of dental restorations and made them more natural appeanng, especially under fluorescent lighting conditions More recently, m the 1990's. opalescence has been incorporated into dental porcelains to produce the natural "opal effect" present in natural teeth Ti anslucencv shading fluorescence and opalescence are optical properties that e the natural tooth its vital-looking appearance Translucency and shading have the greatest impact on the total vitality ot the tooth because thev are the most readily observ ed Dentin and enamel ate both translucent, but enamel is more translucent almost transparent and colorless The color or shade of the tooth mostlv comes trom dentin and is transmitted through the enamel laver to the surtace ot the tooth Enamel is a highly mineralized crystalline structure composed of millions of enamel rods or prisms As light travels through the enamel the rods scatter and transmit the lavs to the tooth surtace much like a fiber optic system Enamel though highly tianspareni does not transmit light like a clear window glass Instead, the enamel diffuses the light, rendering the enamel opalescent Fluorescence and opalescence are more subtle optical properties that further enhance the natuial-looking, life-like appearance or ' vitality" of the tooth Fluorescence is defined as the emission of electromagnetic radiation that is caused bv the flow ot some form of energy into the emitting body, which ceases abruptly when the excitation ceases In natural teeth, components of the enamel, including hvdroxyapatite fluoresce under long wavelength ultraviolet light emitting a white visible light This phenomenon is subtle in natural daylight but still adds further to the vitality of the tooth In contrast, undei ceitain lighting conditions, the lack of fluorescence in a restorative mateπal may become alarming Under "black light" conditions, such as that often used in discotheque-type night clubs, if a restoration does not fluoresce, the contrast between the tooth and restoration may be so great that the tooth may actually appear to be missing Opalescence is defined as the milky, iridescent appearance of a dense, transparent medium or colloidal system when illuminated by visible light. It is best illustrated by the mineral opal, w hich is a natural hydrated form of silica The "opal effect" is a light scatteπng phenomenon in translucent mateπals that produces a blue effect in reflected light due to the scatteπng of short wavelength light and an orange effect in transmitted light This effect is different from simple reflected light in translucent materials and produces the milky nidescent effect present in the natural tooth. Restorations that are not opalescent do not have the vital looking appearance of a natural tooth itself Without being bound by theory, the chemistry and structure of enamel may be responsible tor the "opal effect " Chemically, tooth enamel is a highly mineralized crystalline structure containing from 90% to 92% hydroxy apatite by volume Structurally, it is composed of millions of enamel rods or prisms aligned perpendicular to the dentmoenamel junction and extending to the tooth surface The enamel tods measure about 4-8 m in diameter and the head or body section at the surface of the rods is about 5 τn wide The crystallites are tightly packed in a distinct pattern or orientation that gives strength, hardness and structural identity to the enamel pπsms. The particle size and crystalline orientation of the enamel pπsms likely are responsible for pi oducmg the light scattering "opal effect " Although opalescence has been incorporated into dental porcelains, the current trend in dental restorative technology is to use composite resins for restoration. - rather than the poicelams Composite resms are a type of restorative material which are suspensions of strengthening agents, such as mineral filler particles, in a resin matπx These mateπals may be dispersion-reinforced, particulate-remforced, or hybrid composites Dispeision-reinforced composites include a reinforcing filler of, for example, fumed silica having a mean particle size oi about 0 05 μm or less, with a filler loading of about 30%-45% by volume Because of the small particle size and high surface area of the filler, the filler loading into the resin is limited by the ability of the l esin to w et the fi llei C onsequently, the filler loading is limited to about 45% bv v olume Due to the low loading, the filler particles are not substantially in contact with one another Thus, the primary reinforcing mechanism of such dispersion-reinforced composites is by dislocation of flaws in the matrix around the filler In dispersion- reinforced matei ials. the strength of the resin matrix contributes significantly to the total strength ot the composite In dentistiy, dispersion-reinforced composite resins or microfills are typically used for cosmetic restorations due to their ability to retain surface luster Typically, these microfill resms use free radical-polymeπzable resins such as methacrylate monomers, which, alter polymerization, are much weaker than the dispersed fillei Despite the dispersion reinforcement, microfill resins are structurally weak, limiting their use to low stress restorations One example of a dispersion-reinforced composite is HELIOMOLAR" . which is a dental composite including fumed silica particles on the order of 0 05 μm mean particle size and l are earth fluoride particle on the order of less than 0.2 μm mean particle size HELIOMOLAR" is a radiopaque micro fill-type composite available from Vivadent The raie earth fluoride particles contribute to both flexural strength and radiopacity Particulate-remforced composites typically include a reinforcing filler having an average particle size greater than about 0 6 μm and a filler loading of about 60% by \ olume t these high filler loadings, the filler particles begin to contact one another and contribute substantially to the reinforcing mechanism due to the interaction of the particles with one another and to interruption of flaws by the particles themselves These particulate-remforced composite resms are stronger than microfill resms As with the dispei sion-remforced composites, the les matrix typically includes methacrylate monomei s Howev er, the filler in particulate-remforced composites has a greater impact on the total strength of the composite Therefore, particulate-remforced composites are typically used for stress bearing restorations Another class ot dental composites, known as hybrid composites, include the featuies and advantages oi dispersion reinforcement and those of particulate reinforcement Hybrid composite resms contain fillers having an average particle size of 0 6 μm or greater with a micro filler having an average particle size of about 0 05 um or less HERCULITE R XRV (Kerr Corp ) is one such example HERCULITE" is considered b\ many as an industry standaid for hybrid composites It has an average particle size of 0 84 μm and a filler loading of 57 5% by volume The filler is produced by a wet milling process that produces fine particles that are substantially contaminant free About 10% by volume of this filler exceeds 1 50 μm in average particle size In clinical use. the surtace ot HERCULITE" turns to a semi-glossy matte finish over time Because of this, the restoration may become distinguishable from normal tooth structure when dry, which is not desirable for a cosmetic restoration Another class of composites, flowable composites, have a volume fraction of structural filler of about 10% to about 30% by volume These flowable composites are mainly used in low viscosity applications to obtain good adaptation and to prevent the formation of gaps duπng the filling of a cavity V arious methods of forming submicron particles, such as precipitation or sol gel methods, are available to produce particulate reinforcing fillers for hybπd composites Comminution by a milling method may also be used for forming the submicron particles The predominant types of milling methods are dry milling and wet milling In di v milling air or an inert gas is used to keep particles in suspension However fine particles tend to agglomerate in response to v an der Waals torces, which limits the capabilities of dry milling Wet milling uses a liquid such as water or alcohol to control agglomeration of fine particles Therefore, wet milling is typically used for comminution of submicron-sized particles As opposed to the spherically-shaped particles typically pioduced by sol gel methods, the ground particles are nonspheπcal, providing increased adhesion of the resin to the structural filler, thereby further enhancing the overall strength of the composite In copending U S Patent Application Serial No 09/270,999 entitled "Optimum Particle Sized Hybud Composite," C Angeletakis et al , filed on March 17 1999 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, there is disclosed a resin- containing dental composite including a translucent structural filler of ground particles having an average particle size of between about 0 05 μm and about 0 5 μm that has the high strength required foi load beaiing restorations, yet maintains a glossy appearance in clinical use required for cosmetic restorations Specifically, since the structural filler size is less than the wavelength of visible light, the surface of a dental restoration will reflect more light in some directions than in others even after wear of the composite by brushing The visible light waves do not substantially interact with the structural filler particles protruding out of the surface of the composite, and therefore, haze is reduced and the luster of the surface is maintained even after substantial brushing This application repiesents a significant advancement in hvbπd composite technology, but some of the composites produced according to the teachings of this pending application lack the vital looking appearance of a natural tooth As can be discerned from the multitude of patents in the area of dental restorati e matei ials, the de elopment of composite resins for dental restorations has been extremely difficult, attempting to balance physical properties with optical properties to produce an overall superior product Pursuit of the "opal effect" in composite resins has mainly focused on small additions of "opal agents" or pigments, such as microfine titania. alumina or zirconia to achieve opalescence For example, European Publication No 533,434 describes the addition of microfine titania (<0 2 m) in an amount less than 2 wt % to hybπd or microfill cold-polymeπzable dental composite formulations to achieve opalescence It is desn able to achieve opalescence in both hot- and cold- polymeπzable dental composite resins, particularly the composite described in the copending application No 09/270,999 While opalescence may be achieved by modifying the composite formulations with small amounts of opal agents or pigments, the present invention focuses on the development of a self-opalescmg composite resin Summary of the Invention The present invention provides a resin-containing dental composite including a dispersed phase, reinforcing, translucent filler having about 15-80% by volume of these filler particles in the particle size range between about 0 2 μm and about 0 6 μm whereby the composite has a self-opalescmg quality Without the addition of opalescence-imparting pigments, the dental restorative composite of the present invention displays opalescence to the visible eye, which gives the restoration the appearance of a vital, natural tooth To this end, and in accordance with the principles of the present inv ention opalescence as defined herein by an average ΔC* coordinate of at least about 9 is achie ed bv incorporating into a resin matrix a translucent filler, preferably at a loading between about 20-86% by weight of the composite, in which about 15-80% by volume, and preferably 25-80% by volume, of this filler component has particles in the size tange of about 0 2-0 6 μm In a further feature of the present invention, the refractive indices of the resin and the translucent filler are the same or substantially similar, both being withm the range of 1 45-1 60 More particularly, it is preferred that the refractiv e index of the filler be within +/ 0 04 of the retractive index of the resin In yet a further feature of the present invention, to prev ent the opal effect achieved by the present invention from being masked, the dental restorative composite compπses less than 0 0021 % by weight yellow hue pigments such that the composite formulation is relatively colorless, much like human enamel In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the filler is ground, typically by agitator or vibratory milling, to the preferred particle size range As opposed to the particles formed by the known sol-gel process, the gπnding of the filler results in nonspheπcal particles which due to their irregular shape interact with the polymeπzed resin to a much greater extent to increase adhesion of the resin to the filler and thereby increase the overall strength of the composite. In accordance with a further aspect of the invention, microfill particles having a mean panicle size less than about 0 05 μm may be added, preferably between about 1% by weight and about 15% by weight of the composite to form a hybπd composite The microfill particles contπbute to dispersion reinforcement, fill the interstices between the larger structural filler particles reducing occluded volume, and provide a large surface area to be wetted by the resin to increase strength The microfill particles also contπbute to the flow properties of the uncured resin. Detailed Description of the Invention The present invention, in a preferred form, is a dental restorati e composite that includes a translucent filler having sufficient particles in the particle size range between about 0.2 μm and about 0 60 μm whereby the composite is self- opalescmg The opalescence produced by the translucent, reinforcing fillers is less pronounced than that achieved by the addition of opalescence-imparting pigments Hence, to produce enough opalescence in the composite, this translucent filler must be present in relatively high loadings. More particularly, the composite of the present invention should comprise about 20-86% by weight of a translucent filler, with 15-80% by volume, and preferably 25-80% by volume, of this filler component being in the 0 2- 0.6 μm particle size range The particle size of the individual particles may be measured by any known method, such as laser scattering described below The composite of the present invention may be of the hybπd type, further containing a microfill having a mean particle size less than about 0 05 μm in a curable resin, preferably a photopolymeπzable resin containing methacrylate monomers Such methacrylate monomer resins are cured when exposed to visible light The dental composite is applied to teeth by the dental practitioner and exposed to a visible light source to cure the resin The cured composite of the present invention displays opalescence similar to that ot natural tooth In a composite material, such as a tooth colored dental restorative, the resin matπx and the filler should be matched in their refractiv e index to achieve a transparency similai to tooth structuie, as opposed to clear or opaque materials In addition, this transparency is necessary for the material to be cured using visible light initiation of polymerization The formulator has relatively wide choices for adjusting the refractive index of the resin because resins in the range of about 1 45 to about 1 60 are easily av ailable commerciallv Although glass fillers are much more complex to formulate, micron-sized paniculate fillers may be manufactured to have a refractiv e index in the 1 45- 1 60 range Moreover, the puπty of the glass filler should be very high because small amounts of impurities, down to the low ppm level, show verv prominently w hen the fillei is dispersed in the resin Thus in accordance with the principles of the present inv ention the refractive index of the polymerized resin is the same or similar to the refractive index of the filler More specifically, it is preferred that the refractive indices be within +/- 0 04 Translucent fillers suitable for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to boiosilicate glass, barium magnesium aluminosihcate glass, barium aluminosihcate glass, amorphous silica, zirconium silicate, titanium silicate, baπum oxide, quartz, alumina and other inorganic oxide particles In one embodiment of the present invention, the translucent filler of the present invention has a mean particle size of about O. lμm to about 1.0 μm, with 15- 80% by volume of this filler falling within the particle size range of 0.2-0 6 μm. In another embodiment of the present invention, the translucent filler is that described in copending application Serial No 09/270.999, but with 15-80% by volume of the filler falling within the 0.2-0.6 μm particle size range. Such a composite having a filler with a mean particle size of 0.05-0 5 μm with 15-80% by volume of that filler in the 0.2-0 6 μm particle size range will provide the high strength required for load bearing restorations, w ill maintain a glossy appearance in clinical use, and ill have a vital, opalescent, translucent appearance To provide translucent filler having sufficient particles in the particle size range of 0.2-0 6 μm, a chemical sol gel process may be used to manufacture the filler, or preferably, a filler may be ground to the size range by an extensive comminution step Comminution is preferably performed by wet milling either in an agitator mill or in a vibratory mill. Comminution deagglomerates the filler particles by separating particles from clusters, decreases the size of the filler particles, eliminates large particles by breakage and increases the specific surface area of the filler particles by producing a lai e quantity of fine particles The degree of opalescence may be measured by a simple coloπmetπc method similar to that disclosed in European Publication No. 533,434, incorporated by reference herein in its entirety The method described therein uses the b* color coordinate of the CIELAB scale, as described in Billmeyer & Saltzman, Principles of Color Technology. 2 nd Ed., pp. 62-65 ( 1981 ), and descπbes opalescence as the Δb* value (that is, the transmission b* color coordinate minus the reflection b* color coordinate) foi a 1 mm thick sample of the composite material The Δb* value measures the difference in the blue-yellow b* coordinate of the CIELAB scale, thereby approximating the composite's opalescence A Δb* value of greater than 9 is descπbed as opalescent Opalescence in transmitted light is described as an orange effect, which also contains a red component Thus, for the method used in the present invention tor determining opalescence, the chromaticitv difference, ΔC*, is used ΔC* includes, m addition to Δb*, the red-green chromaticitv difference. Δa* In this case. Δa* is the red- green equi alent of Δb" ΔC' 1 is a scalar quantity, and it is determined bv taking the square root of the sum of Δa* 2 and Δb* 2 At ΔC* values less than 4, opalescence is not observed For dental restorative composites to match the vitality of a natural tooth, the ΔC* coordinate is advantageously at least about 9 At ΔC* values between 4 and 9, some opalescence may be observ ed, but it is only slightly discernable by the naked eve This low degree of opalescence in the restoration does not result in a vital looking appearance similar to natural tooth At ΔC* values of at least about 9, this opal effect is clearly observable bv the naked eye, just as this effect is observable in connection with natural tooth The higher the ΔC* v alue the more pronounced the opal effect becomes Examples In preparing the filler for incorporation into a composite paste, the mean particle size of the filler was measured by laser scattering Laser scatteπng is a method of measuiing mean particle size by sensing the average relative angular intensity of scattered light A beam of monochromatic light with a uniform wave front is directed at the sample, the light is diffracted or scattered by the particles and a detector is used to measure the relative average intensity of the scattered light at vaπous angles The mean particle size and particle size distπbution curve may then be calculated from the relative average intensity One such laser scatteπng device is disclosed in U S Patent No 5,610,712 to Schmitz et al , incorporated herein by reference in its entirety For the present examples a Honba Model LA-910 Laser Scatteπng Mean Particle Size Analyzer was used The particle size distπbution and mean particle size for each ot the fillers was measured and the cumulative volume percent of filler particles distributed in the 0 2-0 6«m particle size range w as calculated from the particle size distπbution curves The filleis used in the composites of the present invention are preferabh silanated For the following examples, the fillers were silanated by spraying in a V- blender w ith a 20% hydrolyzed solution of gamma-methacryloxypropyltπmethoxy- silane in w ater to make the filler powder hydrophobic The loading of the silane in the filler w as 2 5% b\ weight The properly sized translucent filler may be combined with colloid sized particles, such as types of silica, alumina and silicates, for example silica zirco a or silica titania, the particles having a mean particle size less than 0 05 μm to form a hybrid composite if desired To pically, hydrophobic fumed silica is used in an amount between 1- 15 wt% of the final composition The translucent filler, and optional colloidal filler is then combined with a light-curable resin base mateπal which may include commercially available monomeis containing methaciylate gioups TABLES 1 and 2 list the components of the resins that will be used in later examples TABLE 1 RESIN COMPOSITION A TABLE 2 RESIN COMPOSITION B Othei monomeis may be used in the resin composition, such as diethylene glycol dimethacrylate, triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, tetraethylene glycol dimethacrylate, 1 ,6-hexanediol dimethacrylate, 1 , 12-dodecanediol dimethacrylate. diurethane dimethacrylate (Rohamere 6661-0, Huls Amenca. Somerset, NJ), tπ- methylolpropane tπmethacrylate, glyceryl dimethacrylate, and neopentylglycol dimethacrylate The resin composition is introduced into a planetary mixer thermostated at 50° C The planetary mixer is then started and the filler (or fillers) is added slowly over a peπod of 3 hours. The composite is subsequently mixed for another hour and then de-aerated under attenuated oxygen pressure. Samples having the dimensions of 1 mm thick x 2 inches diameter were then prepared in stainless steel molds sandwiched between glass slides. The samples were light cured for 10 minutes in a Cure Plus curing light (Jeneπc Pentron Inc.) and additionally heat cured for 10 minutes at 135 °C in a Belleglass Cuπng Unit (Kerr Corp.). The chromaticitv coordinates for standard daylight conditions were measured for each cured disk in the transmission and reflectance modes using a TCS Plus Colorimeter (BYK Gardnei Inc ) Example 1 Control Samples 1 and 2, and Test Samples 1 -3 were prepared as described above, using silane treated borosilicate glass as the translucent filler, differing only in mean particle size and distnbution Control Sample 2 also contains 0.1 % by weight titanium dioxide (type P25 from Degussa Corp., Ridgefield Park, N J.), a known opalescence-imparting pigment. Borosilicate glass has a refractive index of about 1.48 Each translucent filler was mixed with Resm Composition B, as provided in Table 2, with the translucent filler loading being 74% by weight of the total composition. Resin Composition B has a refractive index of 1 478, and thus the refractive indices of the filler and resin are within 0.002 of each other. TABLE 3 provides the cumulative volume percent of the translucent filler falling within the 0.2-0.6μm particle size range and the resulting ΔC* value. TABLE 3 OPALESCENCE OF BOROSILICATE GLASS As TABLE 3 demonstrates, where the mean particle size is large and the distribution is such that a low percentage falls within the 0.2-0.6um particle size range, as in Control Sample 1 , the composite displays low opalescence. less than that required to simulate natural tooth and less than that required for the "opal effect" to be visible to the naked eye. The low opalescence is believed to be due to weak diffuse interaction w ith light, such that there is a small amount of light scattering. In contrast. Test Samples 1 -3 are clearly opalescent, having ΔC* values w ell above 9. Although the opalescence is not as dramatic as Control Sample 2. w hich contains the opalescence-imparting pigment, it is clearly discernible to the naked eye and the restorations made from these test composites display vitality similar to natural tooth. Example 2 Control Sample 3 and Test Samples 4 and 5 were prepared as described above, using silane treated barium aluminosihcate glass as the translucent filler. differing only in mean particle size and distribution. Barium aluminosihcate glass has a high refractive index of about 1.54, and contains a heavy metal, barium, to impart x-ray radiopacity to the restoration. Each translucent filler was mixed with Resm Composition A. as prov ided in Table 1, with the translucent filler loading being 78% by weight of the total composition Resm Composition A has a refractive index of 1 518, and thus the refractive indices of the filler and resin are within 0 022 of each other TABLE 4 provides the cumulative volume percent of the translucent filler falling within the 0 2-0 6um particle size range and the resulting ΔC* value TABLE 4 OPALESCENCE OF BARIUM ALUMINOSILICATE GLASS As TABLE 4 demonstrates. Control Sample 3 having a slightly higher loading of barium aluminosihcate translucent filler distributed in the 0 2-0 6μm particle size range than the borosilicate glass of Control Sample 1 has some degree of opalescence, which is slightly discernible by the naked eye, but as the mean particle size is reduced and a larger amount of particles fall within the 0 2-0 6μm particle size range, the degree of opalescence increases significantly and is more clearly visible by the naked eye Example 3 Test Samples 6-9 were prepared as described above, using different translucent fillers of varying mean particle size and filler loadings Silica (OX-50 from Degussa Corp ), used in Test Samples 6 and 7, has a refractive index of about 1 45 The translucent silica fillei was mixed with Resm Composition B, as provided in Table 2, with the translucent filler loading as listed m TABLE 5 Resin Composition B has a refractive index of 1 478, and thus the refractive indices of the silica filler and resin are within 0 028 of each other The titanium silicate filler of Test Sample 8 (from Tokuyama, Japan) was mixed with Resm Composition B, while the zirconium silicate filler ot Test Sample 9 ( horn Tokuyama. Japan) was mixed with Resm Composition A These silicate fillers comprise nanoparticles produced bv the sol gel process, and the refractive index as not measured TABLE 5 provides the total filler loading for the composite formulation, the cumulative volume percent of the translucent filler falling within the 0 2-0 6αm particle size lange and the resulting ΔC* value TABLE 5 OPALESCENCE OF OTHER GLASSES Λs TABLE 5 demonstrates silica fillei s pioduce opalescence that is discernible in v arvmg degrees to the naked eve w ith the degree of opalescence being dependent upon the mean particle size and loading The 0 04um silica filler produced a ΔC* v alue of 9 52 with a filler loading of only 20% by weight in which 15 9% by volume of this filler has particles in the 0 2-0 6um particle size range While this degree of opalescence is visible to the naked eye, the 0 4μm agglomerated silica filler having a higher loading of 40% by weight in which a high amount of the filler falls within the 0 2-0 6μm particle size range produced a much stronger degree of opalescence as indicated by the ΔC* value of 24 58 The titanium silicate and zirconium silicate formulas having still higher loadings, 74% by weight, with a high amount of the filler falling withing the 0.2-0.6μm range also displayed relatively high degrees of opalescence. From the examples described above, it appears that high distributions of translucent filler particles either below 0.2μm or above 0.6wm result in low opalescence. This is believed to be due to these particles not having a sufficiently strong interaction with light to produce light scattering, which produces the "opal effect." Particles within the 0.2-0.6um particle size range have a strong diffuse interaction with light. If present in sufficient amounts in the composite, these particles will produce a high degree of opalescence that is clearly visible to the naked eye, giving a dental restoration made from this composite a vital-looking appearance. Example 4 Test Samples 10-13 were prepared as described above, using silane treated OΛu barium aluminosihcate glass, differing only in tint, or color shade. Test Sample 5 from Table 4 is an untinted composite paste, meaning that it contains no color pigments to shade the composite. Test Samples 10-13 contain yellow hue pigments to match the color of the cured composite to the color of natural teeth. Two different commercially available yellow hue pigments were used, namely FDC#6 from Warner Jenkinson, Inc. and Y01987 from Pfizer Inc. The filler used in the composite paste of Test Sample 10 contains 50% by weight untinted filler and 50% by weight of filler tinted with the yellow hue pigments to create a Vita Shade A3 color, according to the known shading system used in the dental industry for matching the color of natural teeth. The fillers used in the composite pastes of Test Samples 1 1 , 12 and 13 contain 75%, 90% and 100% by weight tinted filler, respectively. Each translucent filler was mixed with Resin Composition A, as provided in Table 1 , with the translucent filler loading being 78% by weight of the total composition, and with the cumulative volume percent of the translucent fillei falling within the 0 2-0 6μm particle size range being 67% TABLE 6 provides the weight percent of yellow pigment used in the composite paste and the resulting ΔC* value TABLE 6 OPALESCENCE OF TINTED BARIUM ALUMINOSILICATE GLASS TABLE 6 demonstrates the effect of color pigments on opalescence Opalescence observed in teeth and restorative materials is a subtle effect that may be affected by other moi e dominant optical properties For example, opalescence may be significantly affected, or masked, by color or shade In particular, hues in the range of yellow and blue from pigmentation are believed to affect opalescence significantly if sufficient chroma is present Composite resm formulas shaded to match the yellow hue present in natural teeth, for example the Vita Shade A3 formula, may mask opalescence because of the strong yellow chioma in the b* coordinate Test Samples 5 and 10-13 have identical components with the exception of the addition of varying quantities of a yellow hue pigmentation in Test Samples 10-13 As TABLE 6 demonstrates, opalescence decreases with increasing shading of the composite paste. The untmted composite had a ΔC* value of 12.45 and the opalescence was clearly discernible. Test Samples 10 and 1 1 contained small quantities of pigment, less than about 0 0021% by weight of the total composition, and had ΔC* values of 1 1 37 and 10.17, respectively, which again the opalescence is clearly discernible by the naked eye, but not to as high a degree as the untinted composite Test Sample 12 contained a higher amount of pigment, 0 00216% by weight of the total composition, and had a ΔC* value of 8.82, which opalescence is only borderline visible by the naked eye Test Sample 13 had a relatively high amount of pigment resulting in a ΔC* value of only 7 43, which is less than that needed for the opalescence to be clearly visible to the naked eye Without being bound by theory, as pigments are added to the composite formula to produce a Vita A3 shade, the yellow-brown hue becomes dominant and opalescence is not discernible anymore This may explain why opalescence has not been previously observed in dental restorative composites without the addition of opalescence-imparting agents To maximize the opalescent effect from reinforcing translucent fillers, it is believed that the restorative composite formulations should be relatively colorless, much like human enamel To this end, the amount of yellow hue pigmentation added to the composite formulations should advantageously be kept at a level at or below about 0.0021% by weight To express this in an alternative way, the composition should be less than 90% A3 shaded Example 5 In addition to providing opalescence, the composites of the present invention are also translucent A translucency, as measured by %T, that matches the natural tooth structure ranges from 14-80%T The %T is measured from a 1mm thick cured sample by a Gardner XL 10 Color Difference Meter (BYK Gardner Inc ) TABLE 7 provides the %T values for the untmted test samples of the present invention TABLE 7 TRANSLUCENCY OF RESTORATIVE COMPOSITIONS • ■ Refractive index not measurable \s TABLE 7 shows, the Test Samples of the present invention have a translucency that is the same or substantially similar to that of natural tooth Thus, the dental composite of the present inv ention provides a ti anslucent restoi tion hav mg a high degree of opalescence that is clearly discernible by the naked eye Opalescing agents need not be added to provide the vital looking appearance of natural tooth, as the restorative composite of the present invention is self- opalescmg While the present invention has been illustrated by a descπption of vaπous embodiments and while these embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the Applicants to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail Additional advantages and modifications will .??. readily appear to those skilled in the art The invention in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the specific details and representative composition as shown and descπbed This has been a description of the present invention, along with the preferred composition using the present invention as currently known However, the invention itself should only be defined by the appended claims WHAT IS CLAIMED IS

Claims: 1 A dental restorative composite, compπsing a resin base, and a tianslucent fillei comprising between about 15% and about 80% by volume of particles in a particle size range from about 0 2 μm to about 0 6 μm, wherein the translucent filler contπbutes to the dental restorative composite an average ΔC* coordinate of at least about 9 2 The dental restorative composite of claim 1 , wherein the dental restorative composite is substantially free of opalescence-imparting pigment 3 The dental restorative composite of claim 1 , wherein the translucent filler comprises between about 25% and about 80% by volume of particles in a particle size range from about 0 2 μm to about 0 6 μm 4 The dental restorative composite of claim 1 , wherein the translucent filler and the resin base each ha e a refractive index m the range of about 1 45-1 60 5 The dental restorative composite of claim 1 , wherein the translucent filler has a refractive index within +/- 0 04 of the refractive index of the resin base 6 The dental restorative composite of claim 1 , wherein the composite includes less than about 0 0021% by weight yellow hue pigments 7 The dental restorative composite of claim 1, wherein the translucent filler is selected from the group consisting of borosilicate glass, banum aluminosihcate glass, silica, titanium silicate, zirconium silicate, barium magnesium aluminosihcate glass barium oxide, quartz and alumina 8 The dental restorative composite of claim 1, wherein the restorative composite comprises between about 20% and about 86% by weight translucent filler 9 The dental restorativ e composite of claim 1 , wherein the translucent filler has a mean particle size from about 0 1 μm to about 1 0 μm 10 The dental restorative composite of claim 9, further comprising about 1%- 15% by w eight of a micro filler of mean particle size less than about 0 05 μm 1 1 The dental restorative composite of claim 1 , wherein the translucent filler has a mean particle size from about 0 05 μm to about 0 5 um 12 The dental restorative composite of claim 1 1 , further compπsing about 1 %-15% by weight of a micro filler of mean particle size less than about 0 05 μm 13 A dental restorative composite compπsing a resm base having a refractive index in the range of about 1 45-1 60, and 20% to 86%o by weight translucent filler having a refractive index in the range of about 1 45-1 60, the translucent filler compπsing between about 15% and about 80% by volume particles in a particle size range from about 0 2 μm to about 0 6 μm, wherein the translucent filler contπbutes to the dental restorative composite an average ΔC* coordinate of at least about 9, and wherein the refractive index of the translucent filler is within -»-/- 0 04 of the refractive index of the resin base 14 The dental restorative composite of claim 13. wherein the dental restorative composite is substantially free of opalescence-imparting pigment 15 The dental restorative composite of claim 13, wherein the translucent filler compπses between about 25% and about 80% by volume of particles in a particle size range from about 0 2 μm to about 0 6 μm 16 The dental restorative composite of claim 13, wherein the composite includes less than about 0 0021% by weight yellow hue pigments 17. The dental restorative composite of claim 13, wherein the translucent filler is selected from the group consisting of: borosilicate glass, barium aluminosihcate glass, silica, titanium silicate, zirconium silicate, banum magnesium aluminosihcate glass, barium oxide, quartz and alumina. 18. The dental restorative composite of claim 13, wherein the translucent filler has a mean particle size from about 0.1 μm to about 1.0 μm. 19. The dental restorative composite of claim 18, further compnsing about 1%-15% by weight of a microfiller of mean particle size less than 0 05 μm 20. The dental restorative composite of claim 13, wherein the translucent filler has a mean particle size from about 0.05 μm to about 0 5 μm 21. The dental restorative composite of claim 20, further comprising about 1 %-15% by weight of a microfiller of mean particle size less than about 0 05 μm

Inventors: ANGELETAKIS CHRISTOS, KOBASHIGAWA ALVIN I, ANGELETAKIS, CHRISTOS, KOBASHIGAWA, ALVIN, I.
Applicants: KERR CORP, KERR CORPORATION
Application year: 2000
Main classification: A61K6
IPC codes: A61K6