A TECHNIQUE FOR ESTIMATING THE POSE OF SURFACE SHAPES USING TRIPOD OPERATORS

Abstract: A new technique known as "non-pose-distinctive placement removal" is combined with tripod operators (TOs) (Figs. 1a-1c), a method for interpreting range images, and is comprised of two steps. The first is training the system on a new object so that it will later be able to estimate the pose of that object when seen again in some range image (Fig. 4, 114). The second is the actual pose estimation, where a TO is placed at a random location on a new range image containing the object of interest (Fig. 5, 102). Then the nearest neighbor in feature space, the nearpoint, is computed. If the distance to the nearpoint is less than some appropriate threshold (Fig. 5, 108), then the surface is recognized and pose estimation proceeds by computing the six pose parameters of a central triangle of the new placement in the coordinate system of the range imaging instrument (Fig. 5, 112).

Description: A TECHNIQUE FOR ESTIMATING THE POSE OF SURFACE SHAPES USING TRIPOD OPERATORS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention This invention pertains generally to a technique for recognizing and locating objects and more specifically a technique for estimating the pose of an object from a range image containing the object. Description of the Related Art In recent decades, a wide variety of instruments have been built to obtain range images; a range image being a two- dimensional array of numbers which gives the depth of a scene along many directions from a central point m the instrument. Instead of measuring the brightness of many points in a scene, as in a television camera, these instruments measure where each point is m a three-dimensional space. Both range images and the more conventional intensity images from digital cameras have been used in the computer vision research community to determine the pose of observed objects. The term "object" , as used herein, means a particular surface shape. "Pose" means a complete description of an object's position and orientation. For a rigid object this requires six numbers, sucn as X, Y, Z, pitch, yaw and roll, or six equivalent coordinates. The previous methods for pose estimation all suffer from either a lack of generality or from time inefficiency. It is possible to do pose estimation using tripod operators (TO) . See, Pipi one; TRIPOD OPERATORS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF RANGE IMAGES; NRL Memorandum Report 6780, Feb 1991 for a crude and incomplete discussion. Tripod operators are a versatile class of feature extraction operators for surfaces. They are useful for recognition and/or localization (pose estimation) based on range or tactile data. They extract a few sparse point samples m a regimented way so that N surface points yield only N-3 independent scalar features containing all the pose-mvariant surface shape information m these points and no other information They provide a powerful index into sets „, , _,. „ WO 01/43061 or prestored surface representations. A TO consists of three points in 3-space fixed at the vertices of a triangle and a procedure for making several "depth" measurements in the coordinate frame of the triangle, which is placed on the surface like a surveyor's tripod. TOs can be embedded in a vision system in many ways and applied to almost any surface shape. As stated above, a TO consists of three points in space fixed at the vertices of a triangle of fixed edge lengths and a procedure for making several depth measurements in the coordinate frame of the triangle, which is placed on the surface like a surveyor's tripod. These measurements take the form of arc-lengths along "probe curves" at which the surface is intersected. Figure la through lc shows three examples of TO's. Figure la shows a very simple TO with one line probe fixed symmetrically with respect to the rigid triangle ABC. The single scalar feature is the distance from the plane of ABC at which the probe intersects the surface. This resembles a mechanical optician's tool called a spherometer. The number d of scalar features is called the order of the operator. Figures lb and lc show TO's that can be viewed as a set of equilateral triangles hinged together so that all d+3 points can be made to contact a surface. The angles of the d hinges are the features. This type, called linkable TO's, is preferred because of their symmetry and uniform sensitivity to noise. The application if this TO to a planar surface yields ≡O for all the hinges. Many variations of these TO's could be constructed. Feature noise is related to range noise n by the approximate expression n.*=51 x n/e, where n is the feature error in degrees, and n is expressed in the same distance units as the edge length e. From an N-point TO, the N sampled surface points yield only N - 3 independent scalar features, and the order d is N -3. These features contain all the surface shape information in the 3N components of the points since they suffice to reconstruct the relative positions of the N points. They contain no other information. For example, they have complete six DOF invariance under rigid motions, the group R 3 x SO (3) . Thus, they depend upon where the tripod lies on the surface, but upon nothing else. A key property is that for any dimensionality d of feature vector only a 3 (or fewer) -dimensional manifold of feature space points can be generated from a given surface, since the tripod can be moved m only 3 DOF on a surface. This allows objects to be densely sampled with TOs at preprocessing time with a manageable number of operator applications, typically a few thousand, to obtain almost all of the possible feature vector values obtainable from any range image of the object. This set is a kind of invariant signature. For brevity, this is called the signature of the object or surface, with respect to a particular type TO. It can be stored m an array of bins m feature space, e.g., of dimension 3 or 4 , for later efficient access of near neighbors to TO features measured at recognition time These bins can optionally contain precomputed probability densities, analytic expressions for distances to nearby signature manifolds, and partial or complete descriptions of the relative poses of tripods and models, all to serve various purposes m a recognition system. Since m some applications of the tripod operator, the computation consists only of placement and a little indexing, the cost of placing the operator should be kept small. This can be done by efficiently implementing a procedure similar to the following. Consider placing the TO's of Figures lb or lc on a dense range map. Point A can be chosen as any point on the image surface. Interpolation is to be done locally as needed, e.g., using piecewise triangular facets. Point B can be found by moving along a line at orientation α in image coordinates, pixel indices, until the 3D distance |AB| = e This can be done m logarithmic time, essentially constant here, using binary search. Then the circle of the radius .5\ 3 e oriented coaxially around the center of the segment AB, using binary search, to find a point C close to the surface. A similar circular search yields each remaining point. A key step m tne circular search is the mapping, specific to a range scanner's geometry, from a point (x, y, z) to the two indices of the range pixel wnose ray (x, y, z) lies on. This allows the front/behind decision required by the binary search. In the case of a sequential random access range scanner, it may be efficient to monotonically search elliptical paths m image coordinates until the two distances being enforced, e.g., | AC | and | BC | , are both correct The ellipses here are the projections of tne previously described circles onto image coordinates. Finally, i n the case of a tactile TO, the computation is mechanical ; the feature values are to be read from position transducers, e.g., from l i near potentiometers by an analog-to-digital ( A/D ) converter . The following are a few of the symmetry properties of TOs of the types of figures lb and lc . Surfaces w i th one symmetry, such as extrusions, surfaces of revolut i on, and helical projections produce only a 2-dιmensional man i fold m feature space ( for Figures lb and lc) . Cylinders, having two symmetries, produce only a nearly circular 1- d i mens i onal curve, and spheres a single point. Scaling a TO by changing its edgelength does not affect the signature of surfaces swept by a line with one point fixed, e.g., cones, planar n-hedral vertices, and planar dihedral edges. Regardless of the surface, an operator with a 3-fold symmetry, e.g., those in Figures lb and lc, produces signatures unchanged by cyclically permuting each triple of corresponding features. In Figure lc, the three 3-cycles (1, 2, 3), (4, 5, 6) and ( 7, 8, 9 ) show th i s property, for features φ. through φ 9 , respectively. This allows a 3-fold storage reduction, e.g., by permuting the features so that φ. is the largest. if the TO, m addition, has handedness symmetry, the signature can be modified by a procedure that allows recognition of the "other side" of any surface already recognizable. This is called inversion of a signature. It is done by transposing certain pairs of corresponding features, e.g., (7,5), (1,2), (4,8), and ( 6,9 ) in Figure lc, and replacing each feature value wit h - φ. A lso, the s i gnature of tne opposite-handed (reflected) version of a surface can be found by performing those transpositions without negating the features. The s i gnatures of order 3 operators, Figure lb, were rendered as a rotating cloud of points on a computer, selected 2D snapshots are shown m Figures 2a through 2d. In a special case of "smooth" surface regions, the signature is nearly a c i rcular r i ng coaxial with the diagonal axis. The offset and radius of the ring can be readily used to compute estimates of the princ i ple curvatures and other differential geometric parameters. Surfaces with C_ or C. discontinuities tend to produce signatures with similar numbers and kinds of discontinuities, e.g., Figures 2c and 2d, and have roughly commensurate complexities of description. Thus, this umbrella- shaped 2-manιfold can be well approximated with a few polynomials, whereas the discrete signature might need 20,000 points for thorough saturation. This operator (m the inventions preferred form, the linkable TO) is essentially a 3D simulated structure consisting of several triangles hinged together. It is applied to a computer-represented surface, such as range image, by moving it until all of its points lie on that surface. Then the "hinge angles" provide information about the shape of the surface. In a simplified application of tripod operators, there are two major steps. The first is training the system on a new object so that it will later be able for the system to recognize (or estimate the pose of) that object when seen again m some range image. The second step is the actual recognition (or, pose estimation) . SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The objective of this invention is to provide a technique for estimating the pose of surface shapes m six degrees of freedom from a range image containing an object possessing such a surface shape . This and other objectives are accomplished by using a software procedure, with associated hardware, for estimating the pose of an object from a range image containing the object. A range image is a two dimensional array of numbers which represent the distances from a reference point m the range imaging instrument to observed surface points m a scene All six parameters of the pose of an object are estimated; three translational and three angular parameters. This technique involves combining the previously existing method called tripod operators (TOs) with a new technique known as "non-pose- distmctive placement removal" and with other new ideas. TOs are3 geometric procedures which obtain small sparse sets of points from range images m a regimented way. They are useful for surface shape recognition and pose estimation. The technique is composed of two steps. The first is training tne system on a new object so that it will be later able to estimate the pose of that object when seen again m some range image. The second is the actual pose estimation, where a TO is placed at a random location on a new range image containing the object of interest. Then the nearest neighbor m the TO feature space signature from the training data is computed. If the distance to the nearpoint is less than some appropriate threshold, then the surface is recognized and pose estimation proceeds by computing the six pose parameters of a central triangle of the new TO placement m the coordinate system of the range imaging instrument. Then the pose parameters associated with the nearpoint are retrieved. An estimate of the pose of the surface shape m the new image is recovered using those two pose six- vectors; tne pose of the central TO triangle m the new image and the retrieved pose of the central TO triangle in the training image are composed together to determine an estimate where the object actually is with respect to the location of its original model used in training. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure la shows a simple TO with one line probe fixed symmetrically with respect to the rigid triangle ABC. Figure lb shows an order 3 "linkable" TO that can be viewed as a set of equilateral triangles hinged together so that all d+3=6 points can be made to contact a surface. Figure lc shows an order 9 "linkable" TO that can be viewed as a set of equilateral triangles mnged together so that all d+3=12 points can be made to contact a surface. Figure 2a shows a 2D projection of TO signatures taken with the TO of Figure lb with superimposed signatures of six hyperbolic paraboloid patches, four elliptic patches, and 10 spheres . Figure 2b shows a 2D projection of a TO signature of a torus taken with the TO of Figure lb wnose signature is a piece of cone in φ x φ 2 φ 3 space. Figure 2c shows a 2D projection of a TO signature of a 90° planar dihedral taken with the TO of Figure lb, viewed diagonally. Figure 2d snows a 2D projection of a TO signature of a 90° planar dihedral taken with the TO of Figure lb, viewed along the 1 axis. Figure3a shows a pictorial reference for describing the geometry of pose estimation using tripod operators and shows pose estimation using training with a tripod operator shown on the object the training position. Figure 3b shows a pictorial reference for describing the geometry of pose estimation using tripod operators and shows pose estimation with a tripod operator m the test position, shows a pictorial reference for describing the geometry of pose estimation using tripod operators. Figure 4 shows a flow chart for generating the prestored or training data. Figure 5 shows a flow chart for the ideal description of pose estimation method using tripod operators. Figure 6a shows a new image of object in test position for pose estimation for a trihedral corner with beveled edge, with a TO applied at a pose-distinctive place. Figure 6b shows a training image of object in original refereπc " e ~ osition for pose estimation for a trihedral corner with beveled edge with the estimated matching TO placement to that of Figure 6a shown. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT In the primary embodiment of this invention the estimation of pose is the primary subject, relying on parts of the surface which do not possess any pose-confusing symmetry. This is accomplished using a technique known as "non-pose-distmctive placement removal" together with other procedures implementing m a software system called TRIPOD developed by the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, which allows various experiments to be performed involving the application of various kinds of tripod operators (TOs) to real and synthetic range images . The tripod operator (TO) is now described m a general way so that all variations of it which are likely to be useful as a part of the pose estimation method will be included in this definition of a tripod operator. The TO is a computational procedure to be applied to a computer representation of a surface shape, such as a range image or CAD model, called the "surface". Associated with a given kind of TO are three points, A, B, and C in 3-dιmensιonal space. They are constrained to be at fixed distances from one another. Thus, | AB | , | AC | and | BC | are fixed positive real numbers, not necessarily equal. The three points are otherwise free to move with respect to the surface. Thus ABC can be regarded as a rigid triangle, free to be moved around. Also associated with a given kind of tripod operator are one or more "probe curves". The probe curves are curved lines whose purpose is to extract shape measurements from a surface. In applying a TO to a surface, first, the points A, B and C are moved so that all three lie on the surface, subject to the above constraints. Then the "first probe curve" is brought into play. This curve is a predefined line fixed with respect to A, B and C. The first probe curve is then searched for a point D x , which lies on the surface. The arc length along the first probe curve to the point D ι; from some predetermined starting point on the curve, is then taken as the first component f 1 of the feature vector. A second probe curve is a curved line which is described by a fixed predetermined rule mapping the currently placed points A, B, C and D into a unique curved line. Then, just as the first probe curve yielded the surface intersection point D λ and the first component f_ of the feature vector, the second probe curve is used m the same way to yield surface intersection point D 2 and the second component f 2 of the feature vector. All subsequent probe curves are defined similarly. Specifically, m generating a feature vector component f n , a fixed predetermined rule is used for mapping points A, B, C, fi, ... f ^ into a unique nth probe curve. Then this probe curve is searched for a point D_ which lies on the surface. The arc length along this probe curve from a predetermined starting point on the curve to the point D n is taken as the feature vector component f n . As an example, Figure lc shows A which uses nine "hinge angles" noted as 1-9. In generating the point, D 9 , the circular probe curve is determined by three previously placed points, A, B, and D„ . D 3 is the point at the oottom center where edges 6 and 9 meet. The Λ ,„„ ,, PCT/US00/30435 WO 01/43061 probe circle is coaxial with specified reference point, which is A. The arc length is measured (m degrees) around the circle from A to the surface point D g . The feature vector component f 9 (called θ 9 m this example) is 180° for a planar surface, for example. The units of measure for arc length are, m the general TO case, arbitrary, and can be any monotonic function of the usual Euclidean distance along a curve. Definitions of several types of pose to facilitate the following descriptions are noted for clarification. It will be noted m Figure 3 that a number of items are shown in relation to a coordinate system fixed with respect to the range scanner, i.e., the range imaging instrument which acquires the images of the object m "test position" and m "training position". For example, a TO placement is shown on the image of each object. An "object- pose" is defined to be the rigid motion that takes the training image of the object into alignment with the image for which the object-pose is desired. This requires six parameters, e.g., three translational parameters, and three rotational ones. It is well known to those skilled in the art of computer vision or robotics how to represent pose m various mathematical forms. The "TO-pose" of a TO is defined as the rigid motion that takes the points A, B, and C of the TO placement m a prespecified "standard position" into the corresponding points A, B, and C of the TO whose TO-pose is desired. "Relative pose" of two three-dimensional point sets (e.g., TOs or range images of objects) is defined to be m rigid motion that brings the first point set into alignment with the second point set. Object-TO-pose is defined to consist of two parts: first, a description of the location of a predefined central reference point on an object m a coordinate system fixed with respect to the triangle ABC, and secondly, a description of the relative pose of the triangle ABC as it lies on the object and the triangle ABC as it lies on the same place on the object with the object m a prespecified training position. A tripod placement is said to be pose-distmctive if all other placements on the same training object giving nearly the same feature vector have nearly the same pose m 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) with respect to the object. Thus a trihedral corner is not pose distinctive because there are three TO placements 120 degrees apart that give the same feature vector. Irregular or freeform shapes tend to have lots of pose- distmctive placements on them; symmetrical things have few. More precisely, a tripod operator (TO) placement P is said to be epsilon-delta pose distinctive if and only if all other placements which have a feature vector within a distance e of that of P also have ob ect-TO-poses within a distance δ of the object-TO-pose of P, using appropriate metrics m the two spaces. Specifically, an L 2 (Euclidean) metric is used to compute distances m feature space. For pose, the metric is slightly more complicated. The distance between two object-TO-poses is regarded as characterizing how far an object would have to be moved to take it from one object-TO-pose to a second. The distance is defined to be the L 2 norm (root sum- of-squares) of the 4-vector (X, Y, Z, A) where X, Y, Z, are the Cartesian coordinates of the translation of a central reference point p rβ£ in the object from one pose to a second, and A is the product of a scalar constant called posemetric and the angle in radians of the net rotation between the two poses. It is well known to those skilled in the art of computer vision or robotics how to compute this net rotation using "axis-angle" rotation representations. Posemetric is roughly the average radius of the object, so that A is a rough measure of the distance moved by surface points due to rotation. TRAINING PHASE During the training portion of the algorithm , as shown in Figure 4, TOs are placed at many (e.g., 50,000) places on the computer-represented surface shape, such as a range image or a computer assisted design model. For each such placement 114, the system stores 116 the resulting feature vector (f 1 , f 2 , ..., f d ) and the associated information about the relative pose of the TO and the represented surface shape, after first computing such information. This is done by computing m the coordinate system of the represented surface shape the rigid motion which takes the triangle ABC of the TO from a prespecified "standard position" into its current position on the surface. It is well known by those sx lled m the art how to accomplish this function, using a variety of representations of the six parameters of rotation and translation. A test 118 is made to determine if the feature space signature has been sampled densely enough to allow the desired pose estimation accuracy. This density is measured by the RMS Euclidean distance between each feature vector and its nearest neighbor. Other measure of average besides RMS can be used and other metrics than Euclidean can be used. The stored data for the training placements are screened for usefulness m pose estimation 122, and some are rejected, using "non-pose-distmctive" placement removal. This corresponds to ambiguous shapes, particularly those possessing symmetries. Non-pose-distmctive placement removal is performed during the training process as follows: First, make numerous TO placements on the object of interest, and store them. Then make numerous new placements, each of which is tested against the stored placements in an effort to prove them non-pose- distinctive. Specifically, if any stored placement is near the nearer than e to the new one in feature space, but farther than δ from it m pose space, then it is discarded. This testing continues until a specified number of consecutive new placements are tried without it resulting in the removal of any stored placement. A stored point set with most or all non-pose- distmctive placements removed is called a "pose-distmctive signature.' An alternative to stored data for the training placements are screened for usefulness m pose estimation 122 is to utilize the pill box method 124. THE NAIVE METHOD In order to more clearly explain pose estimation utilizing a pose-distmctive signature, a simple version of the method and its shortcomings is described hereafter. After prestoπng the feature vector and associated six pose parameters for many TO placements on a model surface, a TO is placed at random location on a new range image containing the object of interest. The nearest neighbor m feature space is sought. The nearpoint is found; that prestored point whose sum-of-squares distance to the newly measured feature vector is smallest, as m the recognition problem (without pose estimation) αescπoed m Pipitone; TRIPOD OPERATORS FOR REALTIME RECOGNITION OF SURFACE SHAPES IN RANGE IMAGES; NASA Tech. 2004 Symp . , Washington, DC, Nov. 1994, which is hereby incorporated m total herein. If this distance is less than some appropriate small threshold, then the surface is recognized and pose estimation can proceed. This is done by computing the TO-pose (six parameters) of the central triangle A, B, C of the new placement m the coordinate system of the range imaging instrument, ust as m the training phase Then the object-TO- pose parameters associated with the nearpoint above are retrieved. If the newly measured feature vector and its nearpoint among the prestored data correspond to TO placements at the same location on the surface shape, tnen a recovery of an estimate of the object-TO-pose of the surface shape m the new image from those two pose 6-vectors is accomplished. That is, the pose of the central triangle m the new image is known, and the retrieved pose of the central TO triangle m the triangle image, and the disparity between these two poses represents where the object (surface shape) actually is with respect to the location of its original model. One deficiency of the naive foregoing technique is that when the feature vector "matches" the prestored data m that a very close nearpoint is found, the two corresponding placements of the TO may not lie on the same place on the surface This is particularly common m symmetrical surfaces such as surfaces of revolution, linear extrusions, planes, spheres, cylinders, trihedral corners, etc These surfaces shapes do not allow the unambiguous determination of all six pose parameters. When a pose-distmctive signature is used m pose estimation, it is useα just as m the naive method above except that there will now be few problems with pose ambiguity Specifically, in performing pose estimation, the TO is placed at random locations on the range image within some region, perhaps the whole image, believed to contain the object of interest. A given placement either results m no pose estimate, because it is not close to any feature-space point m the signature, or it returns a pose estimate. In the former case, the TO placement either does not lie on the desired object or it lies on a "symmetrical" or otherwise pose-ambiguous region of the object. PILLBOX ALGORITHM A second deficiency of the pose estimation method described in the naive method earlier is that the stored points are discrete. This means that the more resolution desired m the pose, the more points that must be stored m the computer memory. Refeπng again to Figure 4, this tradeoff can be mitigated by making piecewise smooth approximations of the data 124 m such a way that the measured point m feature space is mapped by six scalar functions into six corresponding pose parameters. This is called the "pillbox method." Each pillbox defines a small compact volume of feature space within m which a linear 3-manιfold approximations the set of stored feature space points m that region. Also, a linear mapping is established within the pillbox from feature space to pose space, a union of a number of pillboxes then can represent an extended region of a surface. Referring again to 124 in Figure 4, the algorithm a pillbox representation is made of a small piece of feature space allowing fast mapping from feature values to the six pose parameters. This is done for a sufficiently large number of pieces of feature space so that a reasonable large fraction of the pose-distmctive part of a feature-space signature can be covered by a union of the pillboxes. Some of this description is somewhat computer-oriented, using specific variable and array names, because it is based on text used to describe the algorithm to a programmer m order for it to be implemented. Then the following steps are accomplished: (1) Take a random point " centerplace" m placement space, yielding a feature vector f c and a pose vector " centerpose . " (2) Take additional placements at many points "near" "centerplace" m placement space. Then pick ranges of values for the TO placement parameters I, j and 6 (defined m Pipitone, supra, 1994) and take points randomly or uniformly within the ranges. For each placement made, the six corresponding object- TO-pose parameters are computed and stored along with tne corresponding feature vector ( f : , f 2 , ..., f α ) which is preferably of dimension 4<d<20. (3) Retain only those of (2) whose pose is within some specified distance "pose_spread" of "centerpose." Measure the pose distance as described in the definition described earlier. It is possible that "pose_spread" is large enough to cover as large a piece of the signature as possible without encountering a severe deviation from linearity, either for the feature point set approximation or for the feature space to pose mapping. (4) In order to fit a linear manifold m feature space to the placements from (3) compute the eigenvalues of the scatter matrix of the feature space points, a method well known to those skilled m the arts of statistics and computer vision. What is desired is three "large" eigenvalues and d-3 "small ones, indicating a fully 3D manifold m feature space. Otherwise the "centerplace" will be aborted and the algorithm started somewhere else. An aborted try usually means that either the linear manifold is less than three dimensional due to surface symmetry, or it is more than three dimensional due to high curvature, m which case a linear fit would be poor. (5) Make a "pillbox" around the feature space linear patch of (4). The pillbox is a "hypercylinder" of radius d-. centered on f c ." The 3 orthogonal radial directions, the eigenvectors of the 3 largest eigenvalues, are the tangents, d-3 other orthogonal directions are normals. Call these the t l t t 2 , t 3 , n- ^ , n 2 , n 3 , n t , . . . respectively. The pillbox is defined by imposing the radius "d r " (radial) and a thickness 2d t (tangential); Let df = (f - f c ) be (the feature vector) - (the center of the pillbox m fspace) . This is a d - the pillbox is defined by r +(df.t 2 r < d\, and (df.n 2 + (df.n 2 ) 2 (6) Make a 6X(d+l) matrix which maps a feature vector f into the 6 pose parameters, for f within the pillbox. Do this by separately treating each of the 6 pose parameters as a linear function of f; e.g., PI = a + c^ ■ * ■ c f . . -r c Q f 0 for pose parameter numberl of the six. This _s a standard linear regression problem m the field of statistics; minimizing the mean squared error of the linear approximation leads to an order d+1 linear system. (7) Test the pillbox by making random placements all over placement space For each one falling -nside the pillbox m feature space, checx to see that its recovered pose is within some tolerance t of the actual pose for that placement using the posemetric. This step eliminates non-pose-distmctive points as well as points for which the linear mapping is not a sufficiently accurate approximation 114. The foregoing algorithm allows the system to place the TO on a test image (102, 104, 106, 108 and 112 of Figure 5) and rapidly give one of these two distinctive responses: (1) This is a "pose-distmctive" placement on the desired object, and here are the six pose parameters. (2) This is not useful, i.e., either the TO is not on the desired object, or it is on a place on the object that is confusable with another object, or the placement is not "pose- distinctive. " POSE ESTIMATION PHASE The implementation of the pose estimation portion of the algorithm is described, as shown in Figure 5. A single application of a TO on the test range image 102 is done by first selecting an arbitrary point on the range image to be Point A of the TO. By "point on the range image", it is meant that either an actual range pixel expressed as a Cartesian triple (x, y, z) or an interpolated point between adjacent pixels is selected; next, an arbitrary point on the range image at the prescribed distance [ AB j from point A is chosen as point B. Finally, a point C on the range image is chosen such that it is at the prescribed distance | AC j from A and at the prescribed distance I BC I from B. Furthermore, A, B and C must occur consistently m a clockwise (or CCW) order, as viewed from the range image sensor. Having determined A, B and C, the d feature values f. through f d are computed according to "definition of a TO". Thus, at the end of step one 102, the 9 prototype feature values of f-_ through f d and the d + 3 points A, B, C D,, ..., D d are stored in computer memory. The case of the failed TO placement must be discussed. If any of the d + 3 points cannot be obtained, for any reason, the placement is aborted 104 and a fresh attempt begins at a different arbitrary point A 102. Failure usually occurs because valid range data is unavailable at the required location . A test 104; if the number of TO placements exceeds some predefined threshold 102, quit. A reasonable value for this threshold is one corresponding to the maximum amount of time the user is willing to wait for a result in an application. The distance between the feature vector ( f 1 through f d ) 106 obtained in 102 and the nearest point in the prestored signature, 122 of Figure 4, is computed, the FDIST. This distance may be computed using a variety of metrics, the familiar L2 ( Euclidean) metric is preferred. A test is made of whether FDIST is less than a prescribed threshold D THREΞH x 108. If not, the match fails and Step 102 is executed again. If so, the program proceeds to 112. D ΓHRESH IS selected so that it is small enough to exclude most false positive matches of surface shape, and large enough so that the results will not be mostly false negatives. The pose estimates from the results of Step 102 and from prestored data from either 122 or, Figure 4, are computed 112. Pose estimation is performed by first computing the pose (six parameters) of the central triangle ABC of the new TO placement in the coordinate system of the range imaging instrument, just as shown in 116, Figure 4, of the training phase. This is the "TO-pose" . Next the stored object-TO-pose parameters associated with the near point from Step 108, above are retreived using the data of either 122 or 124. In the discrete point case of training data from 122, indexing is done as described m Pipitone 1994, supra, except with pose estimation occurring, not ust recognition. In the case of 124, instead of finding the nearest neighbor point m the prestored discrete feature point data, pillboxes are used for matching. This is accomplished by initially prestormg the set of pillboxes m feature space, indexed by an array, 3 or 4 dimensions m feature space, whose cells point to the few pillboxes which overlap or nearly overlap that cell. Then during pose estimation, a pillbox is quickly recovered which contains the feature point obtained by the current TO placement, and is used to map from feature space to pose space. The stored pose parameters represent the TO pose m the coordinate system of the training image, with the TO lying on the same surface feature both the training and test images. An estimate of the pose of the surface shape is then recovered m the new image from those two pose 6-vectors. That is, it is known the pose of the central triangle the triangle image, and the disparity between these two poses represents where the object (surface shape) actually is with respect to the location of its original model. If the newly measured feature vector and its near point among the prestored data do indeed correspond to TO placements at the same location on the surface shape, then the object pose estimate will be exact. The estimated object pose is then output to a utilizing device 113 which is either a device for humans to read, or a robotic device which will interact with the object at its known pose . EXAMPLE Referring again to Figures 3a and 3b, in an implementation of the full algorithm described above was made a surface shape (object) described as A and tested on beveled outside corner. The algorithm was implemented in "C" computer language; however any scientific language may be used. Figures 6a and 6b show a pose estimation experiment in which a synthetic range image was first generated of the desired surface shape in the "training position", Figure 6b. After training the system by placing the TO many times on an image of the object in its "training position", the system stored the resultting a pillbox representation. A new range image of the object was generated, with noise added, in a different pose in 6 DOF, called the "test position". Then pose estimation was performed. This consists of automatically placing the TO at several positions on this image until the system found a pose-distinctive placement. The system was then displayed the place to which it believed the placement corresponded. This is the TO placement shown in Figure 6b. The accuracy of the estimated placement of the 12- point TO is apparent to the eye. The system also computed corresponding numerical pose parameters. The total time for this pose estimation operation was less than 50 milliseconds using a Sun Microsystems SPARC 20 computer. The pose estimation procedure computes where it believes the "test placement" lies on the object, shown as "estimated matching tripod operator location 126, on Figure 3a. In numerical terms, the system estimates six parameters describing the rigid motion taking the object from its training position 126, as shown in Figure 3a, to its current position 128 in the test image. The translational component of the pose of tne object 132 is related to a reference point 134, called p ^ _ which is selected to be near the center of the object m the training phase. This facilitates the construction of a meaningful metric for pose difference . DEFINITIONS (1) A point placement space is d, , θ) . This is the usual way of specifying where to place a TO on a range image, e.g., the related TO work. (See, supra , Pipitone, 1994.) (2) A point m feature space is (f 1# f 2 , ... , f d ) , these are the "hinge angles" described above m the case of the implementated "linkable" type of TO, m the system. (3) A point m object-TO-pose space is (coefAB, coefAC, coefcross, axangX, axangY, axangZ) m the test prototype. The first three give the location of a specified reference point "refpt" on the object, typically chosen more or less near its "center", the reference frame of the tripod. See the included "get_cent_coefs ( )", which generates the 3 coefficients and describes the recovery of refpt from A, B, C and the three coefficients The command 'ps" allows the user to change the pose status (recognition or pose estimation) and set the object reference point The 3 "axang" numbers describe the orientation of the tripod with respect to the "standard orientation" defined in "orιent3pts( ) " ( an excerpt of the source code is shown Appendix A). The 3-vector "axang' is oriented along the direction of the net rotation and has a magnitude equal to that of the net rotation. Various angle normalizations are used, as described the code. The 6 pose numbers for each TO placement are stored as global variables, as follows (along with corresponding feature vectors) : float refcoefAB[50000] , refcoefAC [50000 ] , refcoefCROSS [50000] ; short tπ_oπent [50000] [3]; /* angle .01 degree units. */ Although the invention has been described relation to an exemplary embodiment thereof, it will be understood by those skilled m the art that still other variations and modifications can be affected m the preferred embodiment without detracting from the scope and spirit of the invention as described the claims .

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED: 1. A system for identifying an object comprising; a first range imaging scanner for digitally scanning a plurality of known objects to determine image; a digital storage device for storing the plurality of known digital image; a second range imaging devices for digitally scanning a plurality of unknown objects to produce a plurality of unknown digital images; a computer for comparing the known digital images from the first range imaging scanner with the unknown digital images of the second range imaging scanner utilizing tripod operators to obtain the identity of the unknown digital images; and a utilizing device receiving the identity of the unknown digital image. 2. A system for identifying an object comprising; a means for digitally scanning a plurality of known objects to determine an image; means for storing the plurality of known digital image; means for digitally scanning a plurality of unknown objects to produce a plurality of unknown digital images ; means for comparing the Known digital images with the unknown digital images utilizing tripod operators to obtain the identity of the unknown digital images; and means for displaying the identity of the unknown digital images . 3. A system, as m Claim 2, wherein the means for digitally scanning a plurality of known objects to determine an image is digital range imaging scanner. 4. A system, as Claim 2, wherein the means for storing the plurality of known digital images is a digital storage device. 5. A system, as m Claim 2, wherein the means for digitally scanning a plurality of unknown objects to produce a plurality of unknown digital images is a range imaging scanner. 6. A system, as m Claim 2 , wherein the means for comparing the known digital images with the unknown digital images utilizing tripod operators to obtain the identity of the unknown digital images is a computer. 7. A system, as m Claim 2, wherein the means for displaying the identity of the unknown digital images is a computer display device .. 8. A method for identifying an object comprising; digitally scanning a plurality of known images by applying tripod operators to the images at random points to obtain six numbers of pose of the tripod operators with respect to the image range data coordinate system to obtain the known images feature vector; storing the digital scanned image; digitally scanning a plurality of unknown digital images to obtain the unknown images feature vector; randomly applying tripod operator to the at random points to obtain six numbers of pose of the tripod operators with respect to the image range data coordinate system; comparing the six pose numbers of the unknown images to the stored digital data of the known images to identify the unknown image ; and displaying the identity of the unknown digital images. 9. A computer system for computing an estimated pose of an object from a range image containing the object, comprising: a computer for receiving scanned digital representation of known objects and (a) applying a tripod operator at a random place on the digital representation of a surface shape whose pose is later desired to estimate in some range image; (b) store in computer memory the feature vector and the relative pose of the tripod operator and the surface shape ; (c) calculate if the density of the feature vector is greater than some predetermined threshold; (d) f the density of the feature vector is not greater than some predetermined threshold, reapply a tripod operator , as (a) • (e) f the density of the feature vector is greater than some predetermined threshold, perform non- distinctive placement removal on the data (b) ; said computer after receiving scanned digital representation of an unknown object known as a test range image; (f) applies a tripod operator at a random place on the test range image; (g) march a feature vector from (f) to the stored data (b) for the unknown ob ect; (h) if the feature vector s not within a predetermined distance of the stored feature data, the computer reapplies a tripod operator, as (f); (ι)ιf the feature vector is within a predetermined distance of the stored feature data, the computer computes an estimate of six pose parameters of the unknown object and a utilizing device to receive the six pose parameters. 10. A computer system for computing an estimated pose of an object from a range image containing the object, comprising: a computer for receiving scanned digital representation of known objects and (a) applying a tripod operator at a random place on the digital representation of a surface shape whose pose is later desired to estimate m some range image; (b) store m computer memory the feature vector and the relative pose of the tripod operator and tne surface shape ; (c) calculate if the density of the feature vector is greater than some predetermined threshold; (d) if tne density of the feature vector is not greater than some predetermined threshold, reapply a tripod operator , as (a) ; (e) if the density of the feature vector is greater than some predetermined threshold, convert the stored data into a compact piecewise analytic description; said computer after receiving scanned digital representation of an unknown object known as a test range image; (f) applies a tripod operator at a random place on the test range image; (g) march a feature vector from (f) to tne stored data (b) for the unknown object,- (h) if the feature vector is not within a predetermined distance of the stored feature data, the computer reapplies a tripod operator, as (f ) ; (1) if the feature vector is within a predetermined distance of the stored feature data, the computer computes an estimate of six pose parameters of the unknown object; and a utilizing device to receive the six pose parameters. 11. A process for computing an estimated pose of an object from a range image containing the object, comprising: receiving scanned digital representation of known objects and (a) applying a tripod operator at a random place on the digital representation of a surface shape whose pose is later desired to estimate m some range image, (b) storing computer memory the feature vector and the relative pose of the tripod operator and the surface shape ; (c) calculating if the density of the feature vector is greater than some predetermined threshold; (d) reapplymg a tripod operator , as m (a) ; if the density of the feature vector is not greater than some predetermined threshold, (e) performing non-dist ctive placement removal on the data m (b) ; if the density of the feature vector is greater than some predetermined threshold, after receiving scanned digital representation of an unknown object known as a test range image; (f) applying a tripod operator at a random place on the test range image; (g) matching a feature vector from (f) to the stored data (b) for the unknown object; (h) reapply g a tripod operator, as m (f ) ; if the feature vector is not within a predetermined distance of the stored feature data, (i) computing an estimate of six pose parameters of the unknown object; if the feature vector is within a predetermined distance of the stored feature data, and applying the six pose parameters to a utilizing device. 12. A process for computing an estimated pose of an object from a range image containing the object, comprising: receiving scanned digital representation of known objects and (a) applying a tripod operator at a random place on the digital representation of a surface shape whose pose is later desired to estimate some range image; (b) storing m computer memory the feature vector and the relative pose of the tripod operator and the surface shape ; (c) calculating if the density of the feature vector is greater than some predetermined threshold; (d) reapplying a tripod operator , as in (a) , if the density of the feature vector is not greater than some predetermined threshold, (e) converting the stored data into a compact piecewise analytic description, if the density of the feature vector is greater than some predetermined threshold, after receiving scanned digital representation of an unknown object known as a test range image; (f) applying a tripod operator at a random place on the test range image; (g) matching a feature vector from (f) to the stored data in (b) for the unknown object; (h) reapplying a tripod operator, as in (f ) , if the feature vector is not within a predetermined distance of the stored feature data, (i) computing an estimate of six pose parameters of the unknown object, if the feature vector is within a predetermined distance of the stored feature data; and applying the six pose parameters to a utilizing device.

Inventors: PIPITONE FRANK, PIPITONE, FRANK
Applicants: PIPITONE FRANK, US GOVERNMENT, PIPITONE, FRANK, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
Application year: 2000
Main classification: G06K9
IPC codes: G06T7