PROCESS TO MAKE A SUSTAINED RELEASE FORMULATION

Abstract: This invention pertains to a process for making a sustained release complex, Compound (I), which comprises Compound (A), having formula (A), and a copolymer comprising poly-(1)-lactic-glycolic-tartaric acid (P(1)LGT), wherein the amino group of Compound (A) is ionically bound to a carboxyl group of the P(1)LGT.

Description: Description Process to make a sustained release formulation Technical Field This invention pertains to a process for making a sustained release complex, Compound (I), which comprises Compound (A), having the formula / \ HO(CH 2 ) 2 -N N-(CH 2 )-CO-D-Phe-c[Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Abu-Cys]-Thr-NH 2 and a copolymer comprising poly-(l)-lactic-glycolic-tartaric acid (P(l)LGT), wherein the amino group of Compound (A) is ionically bound to a carboxyl group of the P(1)LGT. Background Art Many drug delivery systems have been developed, tested and utilized for the controlled in vivo release of pharmaceutical compositions. For example, polyesters such as poly(DL-lactic acid), poly(glycolic acid), poly(ε-caprolactone) and various other copolymers have been used to release biologically active molecules such as progesterone; these have been in the form of microcapsules, films or rods (M. Chasin and R. Langer, editors, Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems, Dekker, NY 1990). Upon implantation ofthe polymer/therapeutic agent composition, for example, subcutaneously or intramuscularly, the therapeutic agent is released over a specific period of time. Such bio-compatible biodegradable polymeric systems are designed to permit the entrapped therapeutic agent to diffuse from the polymer matrix. Upon release ofthe therapeutic agent, the poller is degraded in vivo, obviating surgical removal ofthe implant. Although the factors that contribute to poller degradation are not well understood, it is believed that such degradation for polyesters may be regulated by the accessibility of ester linkages to non-enzymatic autocatalytic hydrolysis ofthe polymeric components. Several EPO publications and U.S. Patents have addressed issues of polymer matrix design and its role in regulating the rate and extent of release of therapeutic agents in vivo. For example, Deluca (EPO Publication 0 467 389 A2) describes a physical interaction between a hydrophobic biodegradable polymer and a protein or polypeptide. The composition formed was a mixture of a therapeutic agent and a hydrophobic polymer that sustained its diffusional release from the matrix after introduction into a subject. Hutchinson (U.S. Pat. No. 4,767,628) controlled the release of a therapeutic agent by uniform dispersion in a polymeric device. It is disclosed that this formulation provides for controlled continuous release by the overlap of two phases: first, a diffusion-dependent leaching ofthe drug from the surface ofthe formulation; and second, releasing by aqueous channels induced by degradation ofthe polymer. PCT publication WO 93/24150 discloses a sustained release formulation comprising a peptide having a basic group and a carboxy- terminated polyester. US Patent No. 5,612,052 describes cation-exchanging microparticles made typically of carboxyl-bearing polyester chains onto which basic bioactive agents are immobilized to provide a control release system within an absorbable gel-forming liquid polyester. Compound (A) is described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. 5,552,520. The Applicant's PCT publication WO 97/40085 discloses biodegradable polyesters comprising lactic acid units, glycolic acid units and hydroxy-polycarboxylic acid units such as tartaric acid or pamoic acid and processes for making said polyesters. More specifically, it discloses poly-lactide-glycolide-tartaric acid polymers in the ratio 65/33/2, respectively. The Applicant's PCT publication WO 94/15587 discloses ionic conjugates of polyesters having free COOH groups with a bioactive peptide having at least one effective ionogenic amine. More specifically, it discloses that the polymers are made polycarboxylic by reacting the copolymers with malic acid or citric acid. U.S. Patent No. 5,672,659, is the U.S. national phase continuation application of WO 94/15587. U.S. Patent No. 5,863,985 is a continuation of U.S. Patent No. 5,672,659. Pending U.S. Application No. 09/237,405 is a CIP of U.S. Patent No. 5,863,985, which additionally discloses a polyester which must include citric acid, ε- caprolactone and glycolide; compositions comprising the immediately foregoing polyesters and a polypeptide; a polyester that must include tartaric acid as one of its members; compositions comprising the immediately foregoing polyester and a polypeptide; and the foregoing compositions in the shape of rods which are optionally coated with a biodegradable polymer. The Applicant's PCT publication WO 97/39738 discloses a method of making microparticles of a sustained release ionic conjugate as described in WO 94/15587. The contents ofthe foregoing patents, applications and publications are incorporated herein in their entirety. Disclosure ofthe Invention The present invention is directed to a preferred process for making a preferred embodiment of a sustained release ionic conjugate of polymer and Compound (A), which is characterized by the resulting surprising and non-obvious property of zero-order release of Compound (A) from the conjugate. A further advantage of a process ofthe present invention is that the solvents used avoid side reactions and is less expensive to utilize than the process previously disclosed. Brief description ofthe Drawing Figure 1. Shows the in vivo release profile of Compound (A) from a sample of Compound (I) in dog, wherein the sample of Compound (I) consists of about 1 1.25% Compound (A), the polymer is 1- lactide:glycolide:tartaric acid (72:27: 1) and where Compound (I) is administered intramuscularly as microparticles. The irradiated sample refers to a sample of Compound (I) which was irradiated with γ-rays from a Cobalt source. The present invention is directed to a process for making Compound (I), where Compound (I) comprises Compound (A), HO(CH 2 ) 2 -N N-(CH 2 )-CO-D-Phe-c[Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Abu-Cys]-Thr-NH 2 (A) and a polymer, wherein the polymer comprises lactide units, glycolide units and tartaric acid units where the ratio in the polymer ofthe lactide units is from and including 71% to 73%; ofthe glycolide units is from and including 26% to 28%; and ofthe tartaric acid units is from and including 1% to 3%; and where the amino group of Compound (A) is ionically bonded to a carboxylic group of the acid units ofthe polymer; said process comprising the step of reacting an aqueous solution of Compound (A) with the polymer or a salt thereof, in a mixture of acetonitrile and water wherein the weight ratio of acetonitrile to water is about 3 to 1, respectively, at a temperature of about 0°C to 5°C until the formation of Compound (I) is substantially complete. A preferred process ofthe immediately foregoing process is where the temperature ofthe reaction mixture is about 2.5°C; and the process comprises the additional step of isolating Compound (I). In another aspect, the present invention comprises a process for making microparticles of Compound (I), as described hereinabove, said process comprising the steps of: nebulizing an ethyl acetate solution of Compound (I) into isopropyl alcohol to obtain a dispersion of microparticles of Compound (I), wherein the concentration of Compound (I) in the ethyl acetate solution is about 8% to about 12% (W/W); the rate of spraying the solution of Compound (I) from the nebulizer into the isopropyl alcohol is about 4.9 ml/minute to about 5.1 ml/minute; the frequency setting ofthe nebulizer is such that the nebulizer does not spit the ethyl acetate solution of Compound (I); the volume of isopropyl alcohol is about 20 to 30 times volumetric excess compared to the ethyl acetate volume; and the temperature of isopropyl alcohol is about -60°C to about -78°C; allowing the isopropyl alcohol to warm to about 0°C to 22°C; and isolating said microparticles from the isopropyl alcohol. A preferred process ofthe immediately foregoing process is where the rate of spraying is about 5 ml/minute and the volume of isopropyl alcohol is about 20 times volumetric excess compared to the volume of ethyl acetate. A preferred process ofthe immediately foregoing process is where the polymer comprises about 72% lactide units, about 27% glycolide units and about 1% tartaric acid units. A preferred process ofthe immediately foregoing process is where the microparticles have a mean size of about 10 microns to about 100 microns. A preferred process ofthe immediately foregoing process is where the microparticles have a mean size of about 40 microns to about 70 microns. The term "about" as used herein in association with parameters or amounts, means that the parameter or amount is within ±5% ofthe stated parameter or amount. The term "microparticle(s)" as used herein, refers to the micron size particles ofthe ionic conjugate comprising Compound (A) and poly-lactic- co-glycolic-co-L-(+)-tartaric acid polymer, which are preferably in essentially spherical form. The instant application denotes amino acids using the standard three letter abbreviation known in the art, for example Phe = phenylalanine; Abu = α-aminobutyric acid. General Procedures: Co-Polymer formation: The co-polymer consisting of L-lactide, glycolide and L(+)-tartaric acid can be made according to methods well-known to those skilled in the art and as enabled herein. Accordingly, a reactor is loaded with monomers of glycolide, L-lactide and L(+)-tartaric acid and stannous 2-ethyl hexanoate in toluene solution. Preferably the molar percentages of L-lactide, glycolide, and L(+)-tartaric acid is about 72/27/1 , respectively. The L(+)-tartaric acid is previously dried preferably over silica gel in an Abderhalden drying apparatus for about 10 hours. The reactor is then put under vacuum with stirring to remove toluene. The reactor, under an atmosphere of oxygen-free nitrogen, is then heated, preferably immersed in an oil bath, temperature = about 180°C to 190°C, and stirring is increased to about 125 rpm. Prior to immersion, a heating tape (e.g., Thermolyne type 45500, input control setting = 4) is placed on the reactor lid. The time taken to completely melt the reactor contents is noted, typically about 15 minutes for a load of about 300g at about 180°C. Samples are taken every hour during synthesis and analyzed by GPC to determine the percentage residual monomer and to obtain values for average molecular weight by number (Mn) and by weight (Mw) distributions. Typical reaction times are ofthe order of about 9 to 15 hours. The final polymer is also analyzed by titration to determine an acid number in meq/g and by GC to determine residual unreacted monomer content. Further analyses include IR (detection of characteristic C=0 peak); NMR (determination of lactide and glycolide content in polymer) and residual tin (determination of residual tin due to use of stannous 2-ethyl hexanoate as catalyst). Purification/Sodium salt formation ofthe above copolymer: Residual monomer (typically <5% (W/W)) is removed and the copolymer is converted to it's sodium salt form (to promote ionic salt formation) in one step. The poly-L-lactic-co-glycolic-co-L(+)-tartaric acid copolymer (PLGTA) is dissolved in acetone by sonication in a sonication bath to give a solution with a concentration in the range of 19 - 21% PLGTA by weight. To this solution is added a weak solution of an inorganic base such as NaOH or Na 2 C0 3 , preferably 0.2M sodium carbonate - Na 2 C0 3 is used, in an amount so that the resulting concentration of sodium is 1 to 2 times molar excess, preferably 1.2 times molar excess, over copolymer carboxyl groups. The solution is left to stir for about 15 to 60 minutes, preferably 30 minutes, at room temp, to aid sodium salt formation. It is then fed at about 50 to 300ml/min, preferably about lOOml/min, into a jacketed reactor containing de-ionized water cooled to about 1 to 4°C, preferably 2.5°C, using a circulation bath; the amount of water is about 20 to 30 times volumetric excess over acetone, preferably 20: 1 volumetric excess over acetone. The water is stirred at a rate sufficient to create surface turbulence in order to avoid polymer agglomeration during precipitation using a paddle linked to a stirrer motor. Once precipitation is complete, the dispersion is left to stir for a further 30 to 60 minutes to aid monomer removal before being placed in centrifuge bottles and spun down. The supernatant is discarded and the cakes are resuspended in further de-ionized water, re-spun and dried, preferably by lyophilization. Preparation of a Compound (A) Polymer Ionic Conjugate: The synthesis entails binding Compound (A) to the copolymer sodium salt in a medium in which both are soluble, preferably 3: 1 (W/W) acetonitrile: water, followed by precipitation ofthe resulting ionic conjugate in de-ionized water and recovery ofthe water-insoluble conjugate precipitate formed. A solution ofthe acetate salt of Compound (A) in de-ionized water is added to a solution consisting of a washed Na salt of 12,000 MW 71/28/1 to 73/26/1 PLGTA in acetonitrile (Range 24 - 26% (W/W) solution) to which a weak base, preferably 0.5M Na 2 C0 3 , has been added so that it results in about a 1.05 molar excess of Na over the acetate content ofthe Compound (A) acetate salt, and left to stir for about 5 minutes to provide an alkaline environment, preferably pH 8, to neutralize Compound (A)'s acetate group. Approximate weight ratio of acetonitrile: water = 3: 1. Based on target loading required (usually about 8% to about 12%), the quantity of Compound (A) required is determined. From this the volume of aqueous sodium carbonate required to neutralize the acetate of Compound (A) is determined and finally the volume of water for Compound (A) dissolution is calculated based on a desired final acetonitrile: water (including sodium carbonate added) volumetric ratio of about 3: 1. The Compound (A)-copolymer solution is left to stir for about 10 to 15 mins. at about 0 to 5°C, preferably 2.5°C to facilitate ionic binding and discourage covalent binding (by use of low temperature) between the two components. The solution is then fed at a rate of about 50 to 300ml/min into about a 20-30 to 1 volumetric excess of de-ionized water over the volume of acetonitrile in the foregoing 3: 1 acetonitrile- water solution, stirred at a rate sufficient to provide surface agitation and avoid agglomeration and cooled to about 1°C to 4°C, preferably 1.7°C, in a jacketed reactor connected to a circulation bath. When precipitation is complete the dispersion is left to stir for a further 30 to 60 minutes to aid removal of water-soluble Compound (A)- oligomer compounds (oligomers are those lower molecular weight fractions of PLGTA, which are undesirable since they are water soluble) before being placed in centrifuge bottles and spun at about 5000 rpm for about 15 minutes in a centrifuge. The resultant centrifuge cakes are resuspended in de-ionized water and re-spun. They are then frozen and dried by lyophilization for 2 days and Compound (I) (Compound (A) ionically bound to PLGTA) is recovered. The loading is determined by HPLC analysis ofthe supernatant for unbound Compound (A) and nitrogen analysis (the Compound (A) nitrogen content is known and the polymer contains no nitrogen whatsoever). Extraction of Compound (A) from Compound (I) followed by HPLC analysis also allows determination of loading. Compound (I) Nebulization: In order to provide a formulation well-suited for injection into a patient, Compound (I) is formulated into microspheres by dissolving it in ethyl acetate and using ultrasonic atomization (a.k.a. nebulization) to spray the solution into cold temperature, about -60°C to - 78°C, ethanol, isopropanol or a mixture of hexane and isopropanol, preferably isopropanol, which results in the formation of microspheres of Compound (I) upon contact of the Compound (I) solution with the cold isopropanol. The Compound (I)/ethyl acetate solution can be sterilized by passing it through a 0.2μm filter. Compound (I) is dissolved in ethyl acetate preferably by sonication/stirring to give about 8% to about 12% (W/W) solution, preferably 12%, depending on polymer molecular weight and Compound (A) loading, both of which may alter solution viscosity. This is fed at about 4.90 ml/min. to 5.10 ml/min., preferably 5.00 ml/min. to an industrial atomizer or nebulizer (Power- about 70%, Amplitude- about 80%, Frequency- about 34 to 35kHz, preferably 34.50kHz; in general the nebulizer should be powerful enough to generate a frequency which can uniformly spray (without "spitting") the Compound (I)/ethyl acetate solutions from about 8% to about 12% (W/W) in concentration, such concentrations lead to the formation of solid microspheres and the frequency should be such that a mean particle size of between 40 and 70 microns is obtained, which will allow ease of injection through a 21 -gauge or a 19-gauge needle) and nebulized into a volume of isopropanol (IPA) that is 20 to 30 times, preferably 20 times, volumetric excess compared to the ethyl acetate volume, cooled to about -60°C to -78°C, cooling can be achieved, (e.g., via a reactor jacket, addition of dry ice or insertion of a cooling coil) and stirred at least at 200rpm (to avoid microsphere agglomeration). De-ionised water at a temperature of about 6°C is fed at preferably 1.5L/min to the nebulizer jacket to eliminate any local heating effects which can cause fouling ofthe nebulizer tip due to ethyl acetate evaporation. The solution nebulized evenly and an off-white particulate dispersion is seen to form in the IPA. This is allowed to thaw to about 0°C to 22°C over a period of about 30 mins. to 2 hrs before passing it through a 125μm sieve (to remove any large non-injectable droplets/particles) and on to a Whatman no. l filter paper where it is vacuum-filtered. The filter cake is rinsed with further IPA and then vacuum dried. The present invention is illustrated by the following example but is not limited by the details thereof. Modes for Carrying Out the Invention Example 1 Ionic Conjugate of P(1)LGTA (72/27/1) and Compound A Step A: Synthesis of 300g of P(l)LG/tartaric acid copolymer (1- lactide: glycolide :tartaric acid = 72:27: 1) A reactor was loaded with monomers of glycolide (Purac Biochem, Netherlands, 68.7 lg), lactide (Purac Biochem, Netherlands, 227.53g) and L(+)-Tartaric acid (Riedel-de Haen, Seelze, Germany, article number 33801, 3.75g) and stannous 2-ethyl hexanoate (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, article number S-3252) in toluene (Riedel-de Haen, Seelze, Germany) solution (0.0982M, 4.47ml). This corresponded to molar percentages of 71.81%; 26.82%; and 1.36% respectively of L-lactide, glycolide, and L(+)- tartaric acid. The L(+)-tartaric acid was previously dried over silica gel (Riedel-de Haen, Seelze, Germany) in an Abderhalden drying apparatus for about 10 hours. The reactor (connected to a pump via a liquid nitrogen trap) was then put under vacuum (0.04 mbar) with stirring for about 50 minutes to remove toluene. The reactor, under an atmosphere of oxygen-free nitrogen (BOC gases, Dublin, Ireland, moisture content of 8VPM), was then immersed in an oil bath (Temperature = ~180°C) and stirring was increased to 125 rpm. Prior to immersion, a heating tape (Thermolyne type 45500, input control setting = 4) was placed on the reactor lid. The time taken to completely melt the reactor contents was noted, typically about 15 minutes for a load of 300g at about 180°C. Samples were taken every hour during synthesis and analyzed by GPC to determine the percentage residual monomer and to obtain values for average molecular weight by number (Mn) and by weight (Mw) distributions. Typical reaction times were ofthe order of about 15 hours. The final polymer was also analyzed by titration to determine an acid number in meq/g and by GC to determine residual unreacted monomer content. Further analyses include IR (detection of characteristic C=0 peak); NMR (determination of lactide and glycolide content in polymer) and residual tin (determination of residual tin due to use of stannous 2-ethyl hexanoate as catalyst). Step B: Purification/Sodium salt formation with the above copolymer Residual monomer (typically <5% (W/W)) was removed and the copolymer was converted to it's sodium salt form (to promote ionic salt formation) in one step. 81.05g of a 12,000g/mol 72/27/1 poly-L-lactic-co- glycolic-co-L(+)-tartaric acid copolymer (acid number by titration = 0.231 meq/g) was dissolved in 324.24g of acetone (Riedel-de Haen, Seelze, Germany) by sonication in a sonication bath (Branson, Danbury, Connecticut, USA) to give a solution with a concentration of 20.00% PLGTA by weight. To this solution was added 56.17ml of 0.2M Na 2 C0 3 (Aldrich, Gillingham, Dorset, UK), thus providing a 1.2 times molar excess of sodium over copolymer carboxyl groups. The solution was left to stir for about 30 minutes at room temp, to aid sodium salt formation. It was then fed at ~100ml/min into a 10L jacketed reactor containing 8.2L of de- ionized water (approximately a 20:1 volumetric excess over acetone cooled to about 2.5°C). This water was stirred at a rate sufficient enough to create surface turbulence and avoid polymer agglomeration during precipitation using a paddle linked to a stirrer motor. Once precipitation was complete, the dispersion was left to stir for a further 30 mins. to aid monomer removal before being placed in centrifuge bottles and spun at 5000rpm for about 15 minutes in a Sorvall centrifuge (DuPont Sorvall Products, Wilmington, Delaware, USA). The supernatant was discarded and the cakes were resuspended in further de-ionized water, respun and frozen in a freezer (-13°C) overnight before being dried in a small-scale lyophilizer (Edwards, Crawley, West Sussex, UK) the next day. This lyophilizer contains no coolant system. After 5 days of lyophilization 65.37g of washed copolymer were recovered representing a yield of 80.65%. Step C: Preparation of Compound (I) A solution of 1.27g ofthe acetate salt of Compound (A) (Batch 97K- 8501 from Kinerton Ltd., Dublin, Ireland, potency = 85.8% (potency refers to the percent free base peptide present in the peptide acetate salt); acetate = 10.87%) in 5.87g of de-ionized water was added to a solution consisting of 8.01 g of a washed Na salt of 12,000 MW 72/27/1 PLGTA in 24.84g acetonitrile (Riedel de-Haen) (24.38% (W/W) solution to which 2.41ml of 0.5M Na 2 C0 3 (this corresponds to a 1.05 excess of Na over the acetate content of Compound (A)-acetate salt) had been added and left to stir for about 5 minutes to provide an alkaline environment (pH 8) for neutralization of Compound (A)'s acetate groups. Approximate weight ratio of acetonitrile: water = 3 : 1. Based on target loading required, the quantity of Compound (A) required was determined. From this the volume of aqueous sodium carbonate required to neutralize the acetate of Compound (A) was determined and finally the volume of water for Compound (A) dissolution was calculated based on a desired final acetonitrile:water (including sodium carbonate added) volumetric ratio of 3 : 1. The Compound (A)-copolymer solution was left to stir for about 15 mins. at about 2.5 C to facilitate ionic and discourage covalent binding between the two. The solution was then fed at ~100ml/min into 630ml (approximately a 20: 1 volumetric excess over acetonitrile) of de-ionized water stirred at 350 rpm (to provide surface agitation and avoid Compound (A)-copolymer agglomeration) and cooled to about 1.7°C in a 6L jacketed reactor connected to a circulation bath. When precipitation was complete the dispersion was left to stir for a further 30 minutes to aid removal of water-soluble Compound (A)- oligomer compounds before being placed in centrifuge bottles and spun at 5000 rpm for about 15 minutes in a Sorvall centrifuge (DuPont Sorvall Products, Wilmington, Delaware, USA). The resultant centrifuge cakes were resuspended in de-ionized water and re-spun. They were then frozen and dried by lyophilization for 2 days. 8.30g ofthe title product were recovered representing a yield of 91.38%. The loading was determined by HPLC analysis ofthe supernatant for unbound Compound (A) and nitrogen analysis (the Compound (A) nitrogen content is known and the polymer contains no nitrogen whatsoever). Extraction of Compound (A) from Compound (I) followed by HPLC analysis also allows determination of loading, which for the this example was 1 1.25%. Step D: Compound (I) Nebulization Compound (I), 8.27g, from step C was dissolved in 60.77g of ethyl acetate by sonication stirring (room temp.) to give a 12.00% (W/W) solution. This was fed at 5ml/min to an industrial atomizer/nebulizer (Martin Walter Powersonic Model MW400GSIP, available from Sodeva of France) set at Power = 70%, Amplitude = 80%, Frequency = 34.50kHz, and nebulized into 1.35L of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) (20 times volumetric excess compared to ethyl acetate volume) cooled to about -74 + 4°C (cooling achieved via reactor jacket) and stirred at 200rpm (to avoid microsphere agglomeration) in a jacketed reactor. De-ionised water at a temperature of 6°C was fed at 1.5L/min to the nebulizer jacket to eliminate any local heating effects which can cause fouling ofthe nebulizer tip due to ethyl acetate evaporation. The solution nebulized evenly and an off-white particulate dispersion was seen to form in the IPA. This was allowed to thaw to about 0°C - 4°C over a period of about 30 mins. to 2 hrs before passing it through a 125μm sieve (to remove any large non-injectable droplets/particles) and on to a Whatman no.1 filter paper where it was vacuum-filtered. The filter cake was rinsed with further IPA and then vacuum dried. 6.88g of injectable material was obtained representing a yield of 83.19%. The microparticles of Compound (I) had a mean particle size of about 54 microns. The in vivo release of Compound (A) from microparticles of Compound (I) can be and were tested according to the following description. The in vivo study was designed to evaluate the in vivo release profile of Compound (A) following the intramuscular administration of microparticles of Compound (I) to male Beagle dogs by means ofthe pharmacokinetic profile of Compound (A) following its administration. Pharmaceutical formulations of microparticles of Compound (I) were administered intramuscularly in the rear leg muscles. Following a single intramuscular administration ofthe irradiated or non-irradiated prepared pharmaceutical forms containing microparticles of Compound (I) (amount of microparticles injected corresponded to 5 mg of Compound (A) based upon the determination that Compound (A) loading in Compound (I) was 1 1.23%) to groups of six dogs each per pharmaceutical form. The quantitation of Compound (A) in serum samples and the pharmacokinetic analysis is conducted as follows. Blood collection from the dogs are carried out before injection (time 0), and 5, 15 and 30 min; 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 hrs; 1, 2, 3 and 4 days; then twice per week over the first month (for example on Mondays and Thursdays); and finally once a week from the second month until completing the experiment, when the serum levels of Compound (A) were no longer detected. However, the real times of blood collection were recorded and used in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Blood samples (5 ml) at times 0 (before i.m. administration) and at 7, 21, 35, 56 and 84 days after the i.m. injection and blood samples (4 ml) for the rest of sampling times, were taken through the jugular or the cephalic veins at the prescribed times. The samples were placed in two fractions: one about 2.5 ml or 3.5 ml in certain fixed time samplings, in tubes that contain 50 and 80 μl, respectively, of a solution of aprotinin (10 ml of Trasylol® 500000 KJU lyophilized and rediluted in 2 ml of p.p.i. water) and the other one about 1.5 ml in tubes that were allowed to stand. After the red cells clot, the tubes were centrifuged for 20 min at 30000 r.p.m. at +4°C. Serum with aprotinin were removed and stored in two fractions at -20°C until the sample was analyzed for Compound (A). The concentration of Compound (A) in the serum samples were analyzed by a radioimmunoassay method. Standard curves with blank dog plasma and Compound (A) standard solutions were prepared daily. In this method the limit of quantification for Compound (A) in dog serum samples is about 0.050 nanograms (ng)/ml. The areas under the curve (AUC) and the maximum serum concentration (C max ) were normalized by the dose supplied (dose administered to each ofthe animals expressed in μg/kg). The index ofthe absorption rate (C max /AUC) were also calculated. The results ofthe foregoing experiment are shown in Figure 1. Compound (A) or a pharmaceutically-acceptable salt thereof, Compound (I) or microparticles of Compound (I) can be administered by oral, parenteral (e.g., intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intravenous or subcutaneous injection, or implant), nasal, vaginal, rectal, sublingual or topical routes of administration and can be formulated with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers to provide dosage forms appropriate for each route of administration. Solid dosage forms for oral administration include capsules, tablets, pills, powders and granules. In such solid dosage forms, the active compound is admixed with at least one inert pharmaceutically acceptable carrier such as sucrose, lactose, or starch. Such dosage forms can also comprise, as is normal practice, additional substances other than such inert diluents, e.g., lubricating agents such as magnesium stearate. In the case of capsules, tablets and pills, the dosage forms may also comprise buffering agents. Tablets and pills can additionally be prepared with enteric coatings. Liquid dosage forms for oral administration include pharmaceutically acceptable emulsions, solutions, suspensions, syrups, the elixirs containing inert diluents commonly used in the art, such as water. Besides such inert diluents, compositions can also include adjuvants, such as wetting agents, emulsifying and suspending agents, and sweetening, flavoring and perfuming agents. Preparations for parenteral administration include sterile aqueous or non-aqueous solutions, suspensions, or emulsions. Examples of non- aqueous solvents or vehicles are propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, vegetable oils, such as olive oil and corn oil, gelatin, and injectable organic esters such as ethyl oleate. Such dosage forms may also contain adjuvants such as preserving, wetting, emulsifying, and dispersing agents. They may be sterilized by, for example, filtration through a bacteria-retaining filter, by incorporating sterilizing agents into the compositions, by irradiating the compositions, or by heating the compositions. They can also be manufactured in the form of sterile solid compositions which can be dissolved in sterile water, or some other sterile injectable medium immediately before use. Compositions for rectal or vaginal administration are preferably suppositories which may contain, in addition to the active substance, excipients such as coca butter or a suppository wax. Compositions for nasal or sublingual administration are also prepared with standard excipients well known in the art. It is preferred that the microparticles of Compound (I) be administered via parenteral administration or oral administration. The effective dosage ofthe microparticles of Compound (I) to be administered to a patient can be determined by the attending physician or veterinarian and will be dependent upon the proper dosages contemplated for Compound (A) and the loading of Compound (A) in the microparticles of Compound (I). Such dosages will either be known or can be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art. Preferably the dosage should result in a level of at least 200 picograms/ml of Compound (A) in the patient.

Claims: Claims: - 1. A process for making Compound (I), where Compound (I) comprises Compound (A), / \ HO(CH 2 ) 2 - NN 1 N-(CH 2 )-CO-D-Phe-c[Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Abu-Cys]-Thr-NH 2 \ / (A) and a polymer, wherein the polymer comprises lactide units, glycolide units and tartaric acid units where the ratio in the polymer ofthe lactide units is from and including 71% to 73%; ofthe glycolide units is from and including 26% to 28%; and ofthe tartaric acid units is from and including 1% to 3%; and where the amino group of Compound (A) is ionically bonded to a carboxylic group of the acid units ofthe polymer; said process comprising the step of reacting an aqueous solution of Compound (A) with the polymer or a salt thereof, in a mixture of acetonitrile and water wherein the weight ratio of acetonitrile to water is about 3 to 1, respectively, at a temperature of about 0°C to 5°C until the formation of Compound (I) is substantially complete. 2. A process according to claim 1 wherein, the temperature is about 2.5°C; and said process comprises the additional step of isolating Compound (I). 3. A process for making microparticles of Compound (I), where Compound (I) comprises Compound (A), / \ HO(CH 2 ) 2 -N M f Nv -(CH 2 )-CO-D-Phe-c[Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Abu-Cys]-Thr-NH 2 \ / (A) and a polymer, wherein the polymer comprises lactide units, glycolide units and tartaric acid units where the ratio in the polymer ofthe lactide units is from and including 71% to 73%; ofthe glycolide units is from and including 26% to 28%; and ofthe tartaric acid units is from and including 1% to 3%; and where the amino group of Compound (A) is ionically bonded to a carboxylic group of the acid units ofthe polymer; said process comprising the steps of: nebulizing an ethyl acetate solution of Compound (I) into isopropyl alcohol to obtain a dispersion of microparticles of Compound (I), wherein the concentration of Compound (I) in the ethyl acetate solution is about 8% to about 12% (W/W); the rate of spraying the solution of Compound (I) from the nebulizer into the isopropyl alcohol is about 4.9 ml/minute to about 5.1 ml/minute; the frequency setting ofthe nebulizer is such that the nebulizer does not spit the ethyl acetate solution of Compound (I); the volume of isopropyl alcohol is about 20 to 30 times volumetric excess compared to the ethyl acetate volume; and the temperature of isopropyl alcohol is about -60°C to about -78°C; allowing the isopropyl alcohol to warm to about 0°C to 22°C; and isolating said microparticles from the isopropyl alcohol. 4. A process according to claim 3, wherein the rate of spraying is about 5 ml/minute and the volume of isopropyl alcohol is about 20 times volumetric excess compared to the volume of ethyl acetate. 5. A process according to claim 4, wherein the polymer comprises about 72% lactide units, about 27% glycolide units and about 1% tartaric acid units. 6. A process according to claim 5, wherein the microparticles have a mean size of about 10 microns to about 100 microns. 1/12 28 7. A process according to claim 6, wherein the microparticles have a mean size of about 40 microns to about 70 microns. 8. A process according to claim 1 for making the Compound (I), substantially as hereinbefore described and exemplified. 9. A process according to claim 3 for making microparticles of Compound (I), substantially as hereinbefore described and exemplified.

Inventors: LOUGHMAN THOMAS CIARAN, LOUGHMAN, THOMAS, CIARAN
Applicants: KINERTON LTD, LOUGHMAN THOMAS CIARAN, KINERTON LIMITED, LOUGHMAN, THOMAS, CIARAN
Application year: 2000
Main classification: A61K47
IPC codes: A61K9, A61K38, A61K47, C07K14, C07K17, C08G63, C08J5