ANIMAL MODELS AND METHODS FOR ANALYSIS OF LIPID METABOLISM AND SCREENING OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND PESTICIDAL AGENTS THAT MODULATE LIPID METABOLISM

Abstract: Drosophila melanogaster and <i>C. elegans</i> that have been genetically modified to express or mis-express proteins involved in the sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) pathway are described. These genetically modified animal models have identifiable phenotypes that make them useful in assays for studying lipid metabolism, other genes implicated in lipid metabolism, and compounds capable of modulating lipid metabolism pathways. Methods for studying lipid metabolism in living mematodes using fluorescently labeled fatty acid conjugates, such BODIPY<TM> fatty acid conjugates, are also described. Novel SREBP pathway nucleic acid and protein sequences are also described.

Description: ANIMAL MODELS AND METHODS FOR ANALYSIS OF LIPID METABOLISM AND SCREENING OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND PESTICTDAL AGENTS THAT MODULATE LIPID METABOLISM BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION There is much interest within the pharmaceutical industry to understand the mechanisms involved in cholesterol synthesis and metabolism, particularly on the molecular level, so that blood cholesterol lowering drugs can be developed for the treatment or prevention of atherosclerosis. There is further interest in understanding the molecular mechanisms that connect lipid defects and insulin resistance. Hyperlipidemia and elevation of free fatty acid levels correlate with "Metabolic Syndrome," defined as the linkage between several diseases, including obesity and insulin resistance, which often occur in the same patients and which are major risk factors for development of Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Current research suggests that the control of lipid levels, in addition to glucose levels, may be required to treat Type 2 Diabetes, heart disease, and other manifestations of Metabolic Syndrome (Santomauro AT et al, Diabetes (1999) 48:1836-1841). Recent advances have been made in understanding some of the mechanisms involved in mammalian lipid metabolism. A key component is the sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) pathway. SREBPs are transcription factors that activate genes involved in cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis and transport. SREBP is the major mediator of insulin action in the liver, and alterations in expression and function of SREBPs have been described in obese and insulin resistant patients or animal models (Shimomura I et al., PNAS (1999) 96:13656-61; Shimomura I et al, Journal of Biological Chemistry (1999) 274:30028-32). SREBPs are also implicated in the process of fat cell differentiation and adipose cell gene expression, particularly as transcription factors that can promote adipogenesis in a dominant fashion (reviewed by Spiegelman et al, Cell (1996) 87:377-389). SREBP function is regulated by intracellular levels of sterols or polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (Xu J. et al, J. Biol. Chem. (1999) 274:23577-23583). In high sterol or PUFA conditions, SREBPs are retained as membrane-bound protein precursors that are kept inactive by virtue of being attached to the nuclear envelope and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and therefore, excluded from the nucleus. An SREBP in its membrane-bound form has large N-terminal and C-terminal segments facing the cytoplasm and a short loop projecting into the lumen of the organelle. The N-terminal domain is a transcription factor of the basic-helix-loop- helix-leucine zipper (bHLH-Zip) family, and contains an "acid blob" typical of many transcriptional activators (Brown and Goldstein, Cell (1997) 89:331-340). The N- terminal acid blob is followed by a basic helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper domain (bHLH-Zip) similar to those found in many other DNA-binding transcriptional regulators. In low sterol conditions, the acid blob/bHLH-Zip domain of SREBP is released from the membrane after which it is rapidly translocated into the nucleus and binds specific DNA sequences to activate transcription. Two sequential proteolytic cleavages are involved. A first protease, referred to as the site 1 protease (SIP) cleaves SREBP at approximately the middle of the lumenal loop. SIP has been cloned from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (GI (GenBank Identifier No. (hereinafter "GI") 3892203) and a human cell line (GI4506774) (Sakai et al., J. Biol. Chem (1998) 273:5785-5793). After cleavage at site 1 , a second protease (the site 2 protease, S2P) cleaves the N-terminal fragment and releases the mature N-terminal domain into the cytosol, from which it rapidly enters the nucleus, apparently with a portion of the transmembrane domain still attached at the C-terminus. Mature, transcriptionally active SREBP is rapidly degraded in a proteosome-dependent process. This combination of proteolytic processing and rapid turnover allows the SREBP system to rapidly respond to changes in cellular membrane components. S2P homologues have been identified in both vertebrates and invertebrates and have been cloned from human cells and hamster cells (Rawson et al, Molec Cell (1997) 1 :47-57). A third component of the processing system for SREBPs is called SREBP Cleavage Activating Protein (SCAP). SCAP is a large transmembrane protein that activates SIP in low-sterol conditions (Hua et al, Cell (1996) 87:415-426). To date, the SREBP pathway has been studied primarily using mammalian cell culture, by the isolation of mutant cells that are defective in regulation of cholesterol metabolism or intracellular cholesterol trafficking. The mutants can then serve as hosts for cloning genes by functional complementation. This has led to the molecular cloning of the SIP, S2P and SCAP genes (Rawson et al., supra; Hua et al., supra; Goldstein et al., US Pat. Nos. 5,527,690 and 5,891,631 and PCT Application No. WO00/09677). Some SREBP pathway genes have been identified in invertebrates. The isolation of a Drosophila SREBP, referred to as "HLH106" (GI079656) has been described (Theopold et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, (1996) 93(3): 1195-1199). An expressed sequence tag (EST) from Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) which has homology to S2P is described by Rawson et al., supra and is listed in GenBank (Gil 559384). Additionally, GenBank has listed a protein predicted from the C. elegans genome as having HMG-CoA reductase homology (GI3875380). The present invention discloses invertebrate SREBP pathway nucleic acids and proteins and methods of use. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The use of invertebrate model organism genetics can greatly facilitate the elucidation of biochemical pathways, and the identification of molecules that can modulate such pathways. Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide invertebrate nucleic acids and polypeptides involved in the SREBP pathway. It is also an object of the invention to provide invertebrate model organisms, including novel mutant phenotypes, for the study of lipid metabolism in general, and more particularly, for the elucidation of the SREBP pathway. It is a further object of the invention to provide methods for screening molecules that modulate lipid metabolism and/or the function of genes and proteins involved in the SREBP pathway. These and other objects are provided by flies and nematodes that have been genetically modified to express or misexpress an SREBP pathway gene, for example using transposon mutagenesis, RNA interference, chemical mutagenesis, or other genetic techniques. In certain embodiments, expression of the SREBP pathway protein is driven by a heterologous promoter that is tissue-specific, developmentally- specific, or inducible, so that the effects of the expression or mis-expression can be observed in specific tissues, at certain developmental stages, or at specified times, respectively. Additionally, the SREBP pathway protein may be linked to one or more selectable markers that allows detection of expression. Typically, the expression of the SREBP pathway protein results in an identifiable phenotype. In the case of nematodes, the invention provides novel methods for the in vivo measurement of lipid content using BODIPY-fatty acid conjugates. The animal models can be used in genetic screens to identify other genes involved in lipid metabolism. They can also be used for screening small molecule libraries directly on whole organisms for possible therapeutic or pesticide use. The invention also provides novel isolated nucleic acids (SEQ ID NOs:l, 3, 5 and 7) and the SREBP pathway proteins encoded thereby (SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, and 8 respectively), as well as derivatives and fragments thereof. Methods are provided for constructing vectors containing the isolated nucleic acids. Such vectors can be used for making the animal models of the invention. They can also be introduced into host cells to be used for a variety of purposes including two-hybrid screening assays, production of SREBP pathway proteins, screening small molecules that affect lipid synthesis or metabolism, etc. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figs. 1A and IB depict the inactive, membrane-bound form of SREBP (Fig. 1 A) and the two-step proteolytic cleavage that activates SREBP in low sterol conditions (Fig. IB). Fig. 2 depicts the presumed interactions between SREBP, SCAP, SIP and S2P in the SREBP processing complex. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The use of invertebrate model organism genetics and related technologies can greatly facilitate the elucidation of biological pathways (Scangos, Nat. Biotechnol. (1997) 15:1220-1221 ; Margolis and Duyk, supra). Of particular use are the insect and nematode model organism, Drosophila melanogaster (hereinafter referred to generally as "Drosophila") and C. elegans. Novel SREBP pathway nucleic acids, from Drosophila and C. elegans, and their encoded proteins are identified herein. As used in this description, the term "SREBP pathway nucleic acid" refers to a nucleic acid that encodes any one of SREBP, SCAP, SIP, and S2P. The newly identified SREBP pathway nucleic acids have led to the discovery of several mutant phenotypes that can be used to study the pathways involved in lipid and fatty acid metabolism. The use of invertebrate model organisms, such as Drosophila and C. elegans, for analyzing the expression and mis-expression of SREBP pathway proteins has great advantages over the traditional approach of using mammalian cell culture due to the ability to rapidly carry out large-scale, systematic genetic screens. These can identify other components involved in the synthesis, activation, control, and turnover of SREBP pathway proteins. Additionally, model organisms or cultured cells that have been genetically engineered to misexpress SREBP pathway genes can be used to screen candidate compounds or small molecule libraries for their ability to modulate the expression or activity of SREBP pathway proteins. They are therefore useful in the identification of new drug targets, therapeutic agents, diagnostics and prognostics for the treatment of disorders associated with lipid metabolism. Additionally, use of these invertebrate model organisms could lead to the identification and validation of pesticide targets directed to components of the SREBP pathway. Nucleic acids of the SREBP pathway The present invention provides a nucleic acid sequence (SEQ ID NO:l) that was isolated from C. elegans and encodes an SREBP homologue referred to herein as "ceSREBP". The invention also provides nucleic acid sequences that were isolated from Drosophila and encode homologues of S2P (dS2P; SEQ ID NO:3), SCAP (dSCAP; SEQ ID NO:5) and SIP (dSIP; SEQ TD NO:7). In addition to the fragments and derivatives of SEQ LD NOs 1, 3, 5, and 7, as described in detail below, the invention includes the reverse complements thereof. Also, the subject nucleic acid sequences, derivatives and fragments thereof may be RNA molecules comprising the nucleotide sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs 1, 3, 5 and 7 (or derivative or fragment thereof) wherein the base U (uracil) is substituted for the base T (thymine). The DNA and RNA sequences of the invention can be single- or double-stranded. Thus, the term "nucleic acid sequence", as used herein, includes the reverse complement, RNA equivalent, DNA or RNA double-stranded sequences, and DNA/RNA hybrids of the sequence being described, unless otherwise indicated explicitly or by context. Fragments of these sequences can be used for a variety of purposes. Interfering RNA (RNAi) fragments, particularly double-stranded (ds) RNAi, can be used to generate loss-of-function phenotypes. SREBP pathway nucleic acid fragments are also useful as nucleic acid hybridization probes and replication/amplification primers. Certain "antisense" fragments, i.e. that are reverse complements of portions of the coding sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, and 7 have utility in inhibiting the function of SREBP pathway proteins. The fragments are of length sufficient to specifically hybridize with the corresponding SEQ ID NOs:l, 3, 5, and 7. The fragments consist of or comprise at least 12, preferably at least 24, more preferably at least 36, and more preferably at least 96 contiguous nucleotides of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, and 7. When the fragments are flanked by other nucleic acid sequences, the total length of the combined nucleic acid sequence is less than 15 kilobases (kb), preferably less than 10 kb or less than 5kb, and more preferably less than 2 kb. Preferred fragments of ceSREBP (SEQ ID NO:l) contain approximately residues 1090 to 1290, which encode the bHLH-Zip domain. Preferred fragments of dS2P (SEQ LD NO:3) include those having at least 1226 contiguous nucleotides of SEQ LD NO:3, and more preferably at least 1231 nucleotides. Preferred fragments of dSCAP (SEQ ID NO:5) encode the WD repeats, which are located at approximately nucleotides 2509-2617, 3080-3196, 3208-3325, and 3337-3445. Preferred fragments of dSIP (SEQ ID NO: 7) encode the extracellular or intracellular domains, which are located at approximately nucleotides 131-1149, 1214-1434, 1499-1560, and 1625-3040. Other preferred fragments consist or comprise at least 12 contiguous nucleotides, preferably at least 37 contiguous nucleotides, and more preferably at least 62 contiguous nucleotides of nucleotides 2015-2546 of SEQ ID NO:7. Additionally, fragments of any of the foregoing sequences that are double- stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecules have utility in RNA interference (RNAi) studies, as described in more detail below, where model organisms exhibiting loss-of-function phenotype are generated. Typically, dsRNA molecules for RNAi studies are from about 200 to 2000 bp, and are preferably 600-900 bp in size. The subject nucleic acid sequences may consist solely of SEQ ID NOs:l, 3, 5, and 7 or fragments thereof. Alternatively, the subject nucleic acid sequences and fragments thereof may be joined to other components such as labels, peptides, agents that facilitate transport across cell membranes, hybridization-triggered cleavage agents or intercalating agents. The subject nucleic acid sequences and fragments thereof may also be joined to other nucleic acid sequences (i.e. they may comprise part of larger sequences) and are of synthetic/non-natural sequences. They may be isolated and/or are purified and thus unaccompanied by at least some of the material with which they associate in the natural state. Preferably, the isolated nucleic acids constitute at least about 0.5%, and more preferably at least about 5%, by weight, of the total nucleic acid present in a given fraction, and are preferably recombinant, meaning that they comprise a non-natural sequence or a natural sequence joined to nucleotide(s) other than that which it is joined to on a natural chromosome. Derivative SREBP pathway nucleic acid sequences include sequences that hybridize to the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:l, 3, 5 or 7 under stringency conditions such that the hybridizing derivative nucleic acid is related to the subject nucleic acid by a certain degree of sequence identity. A nucleic acid molecule is "hybridizable" to another nucleic acid molecule, such as a cDNA, genomic DNA, or RNA, when a single stranded form of the nucleic acid molecule can anneal to the other nucleic acid molecule. Stringency of hybridization refers to conditions under which nucleic acids are hybridizable. The degree of stringency can be controlled by temperature, ionic strength, pH, and the presence of denaturing agents such as formamide during hybridization and washing. As used herein, the term "stringent hybridization conditions" are those normally used by one of skill in the art to establish at least a 90% sequence identity between complementary pieces of DNA or DNA and RNA. "Moderately stringent hybridization conditions" are used to find derivatives having at least 70% sequence identity. Finally, "low-stringency hybridization conditions" are used to isolate derivative nucleic acid molecules that share at least about 50%) sequence identity with the subject nucleic acid sequence. The ultimate hybridization stringency reflects both the actual hybridization conditions as well as the washing conditions following the hybridization, and it is well known in the art how to vary the conditions to obtain the desired result. Conditions routinely used are set out in readily available procedure texts (e.g. , Current Protocol in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1, Chap. 2.10, John Wiley & Sons, Publishers (1994); Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring Harbor (1989)). A preferred derivative nucleic acid is capable of hybridizing to SEQ ID NO:l, 3, 5, or 7 under stringent hybridization conditions that comprise: prehybridization of filters containing nucleic acid for 8 hours to overnight at 65° C in a solution comprising 6X single strength citrate (SSC) (IX SSC is 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M Na citrate; pH 7.0), 5X Denhardt's solution, 0.05% sodium pyrophosphate and 100 μg/ml herring sperm DNA; hybridization for 18-20 hours at 65° C in a solution containing 6X SSC, IX Denhardt's solution, 100 μg/ml yeast tRNA and 0.05% sodium pyrophosphate; and washing of filters at 65° C for 1 h in a solution containing 0.2X SSC and 0.1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate). Derivative nucleic acid sequences that have at least about 70% sequence identity with SEQ ID NOs:l, 3, 5 or 7 are capable of hybridizing to SEQ ID NOs:l, 3, 5, and 7, respectively, under moderately stringent conditions that comprise: pretreatment of filters containing nucleic acid for 6 h at 40° C in a solution containing 35% formamide, 5X SSC, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% PVP, 0.1% Ficoll, 1% BSA, and 500 μg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA; hybridization for 18-20 h at 40° C in a solution containing 35% formamide, 5X SSC, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 0.02% PVP, 0.02% Ficoll, 0.2% BSA, 100 μg/ml salmon sperm DNA, and 10% (wt/vol) dextran sulfate; followed by washing twice for 1 hour at 55° C in a solution containing 2X SSC and 0.1%> SDS. Other preferred derivative nucleic acid sequences are capable of hybridizing to SEQ ID NOS: 1 , 3, 5, or 7 under low stringency conditions that comprise: incubation for 8 hours to overnight at 37° C in a solution comprising 20% formamide, 5 x SSC, 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.6), 5X Denhardt's solution, 10% dextran sulfate, and 20 μg/ml denatured sheared salmon sperm DNA; hybridization in the same buffer for 18 to 20 hours; and washing of filters in 1 x SSC at about 37° C for 1 hour. As used herein, "percent (%) nucleic acid sequence identity" with respect to a subject sequence, or a specified portion of a subject sequence, is defined as the percentage of nucleotides in the candidate derivative nucleic acid sequence identical with the nucleotides in the subject sequence (or specified portion thereof), after aligning the sequences and introducing gaps, if necessary to achieve the maximum percent sequence identity, as generated by the program WU-BLAST-2.0al9 (Altschul et al, J. Mol. Biol. (1997) 215:403-410; http://blast.wustl.edu blast/README.html; hereinafter referred to generally as "BLAST") with all the search parameters set to default values. A percent (%) nucleic acid sequence identity value is determined by the number of matching identical nucleotides divided by the sequence length for which the percent identity is being reported. Derivative SREBP pathway nucleic acid sequences usually have at least 70% sequence identity, preferably at least 80% sequence identity, more preferably at least 85% sequence identity, still more preferably at least 90%> sequence identity, and most preferably at least 95% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO:l, 3, 5 or 7, or domain- encoding regions thereof. Preferred derivatives of SEQ ID NO:7 comprise a nucleotide sequence having at least 53% sequence identity, and preferably at least 60% sequence identity with any contiguous 125 or 275 bases of nucleotides 2015-2546 of SEQ ID NO:7, or the reverse complement thereof. In one preferred embodiment, the derivative nucleic acids encode polypeptides comprising SREBP pathway amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, and 8 or fragments or derivatives thereof as described further below under the subheading "SREBP pathway proteins". A derivative SREBP pathway nucleic acid sequence, or fragment thereof, may comprise 100% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO:l, 3, 5, or 7 but be a derivative thereof in the sense that it has one or more modifications at the base or sugar moiety, or phosphate backbone. Examples of modifications are well known in the art (Bailey, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (1998), 6th ed. Wiley and Sons). Such derivatives may be used to provide modified stability or any other desired property. Another type of derivative of the subject nucleic acid sequences includes the corresponding humanized sequences. A humanized nucleic acid sequence is one in which one or more codons has been substituted with a codon that is more commonly used in human genes. Preferably, a sufficient number of codons have been substituted such that a higher level expression is achieved in mammalian cells than what would otherwise be achieved without the substitutions. Codons that are more commonly used in human genes are known (Wada et al., Nucleic Acids Research (1990) 18(Suppl.):2367-2411). Also, a detailed discussion of the humanization of nucleic acid sequences is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 5,874,304 to Zolotukhin et al. Similarly, other nucleic acid derivatives can be generated with codon usage optimized for expression in other organisms, such as yeasts, bacteria, and plants, where it is desired to engineer the expression of SREBP pathway proteins by using specific codons chosen according to the preferred codons used in highly expressed genes in each organism. More specific embodiments of preferred SREBP pathway protein fragments and derivatives are further discussed below. Nucleic acid encoding the amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 6, or 8, or a fragment or derivative thereof, may be obtained from an appropriate cDNA library prepared from any eukaryotic species that encodes SREBP pathway proteins such as vertebrates, preferably mammalian (e.g. primate, porcine, bovine, feline, equine, and canine species, etc.) and invertebrates, such as arthropods, particularly insects species (preferably Drosophila), acarids, Crustacea, molluscs, nematodes (preferably C. elegans), and other worms. An expression library can be constructed using known methods. For example, mRNA can be isolated to make cDNA that is ligated into a suitable expression vector for expression in a host cell into which it is introduced. Various screening assays can then be used to select for the gene or gene product (e.g. ohgonucleotides of at least about 20 to 80 bases designed to identify the gene of interest, or labeled antibodies that specifically bind to the gene product). The gene and/or gene product can then be recovered from the host cell using known techniques. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can also be used to isolate nucleic acids of the SREBP pathway where oligonucleotide primers representing fragmentary sequences of interest amplify RNA or DNA sequences from a source such as a genomic or cDNA library (as described by Sambrook et al., supra). Additionally, degenerate primers for amplifying homologs from any species of interest may be used. Once a PCR product of appropriate size and sequence is obtained, it may be cloned and sequenced by standard techniques, and utilized as a probe to isolate a complete cDNA or genomic clone. Fragmentary sequences of SEQ ID NOs 1, 3, 5 and 7 nucleic acids and derivatives may be synthesized by known methods. For example, ohgonucleotides may be synthesized using an automated DNA synthesizer available from commercial suppliers (e.g. Biosearch, Novato, CA; Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Antisense RNA sequences can be produced intracellularly by transcription from an exogenous sequence, e.g. from vectors that contain antisense SREBP pathway nucleic acid sequences. Newly generated sequences may be identified and isolated using standard methods. An isolated SREBP pathway nucleic acid sequence can be inserted into any appropriate cloning vector, for example bacteriophages such as lambda derivatives, or plasmids such as PBR322, pUC plasmid derivatives and the Bluescript vector (Stratagene, San Diego, CA). Recombinant molecules can be introduced into host cells via transformation, transfection, infection, electroporation, etc., or into a transgenic animal such as a fly. The transformed cells can be cultured to generate large quantities of the SREBP pathway nucleic acid. Suitable methods for isolating and producing the subject nucleic acid sequences are well known in the art (Sambrook et al, supra; DNA Cloning: A Practical Approach, Vol. 1, 2, 3, 4, (1995) Glover, ed., MRL Press, Ltd., Oxford, U.K.). The nucleotide sequence encoding an SREBP pathway protein, or a fragment or derivative thereof, can be inserted into any appropriate expression vector for the transcription and translation of the inserted protein-coding sequence. Alternatively, the native SREBP pathway gene and/or its flanking regions can supply the necessary transcriptional and translational signals. A variety of host-vector systems may be utilized to express the protein-coding sequence. These include mammalian cell systems infected with virus (e.g. vaccinia virus, adenovirus, etc.), insect cell systems infected with virus (e.g. baculovirus), microorganisms such as yeast containing yeast vectors, or bacteria transformed with bacteriophage, DNA, plasmid DNA, or cosmid DNA. Expression of a SREBP pathway protein may be controlled by a suitable promoter/enhancer element. In addition, a host cell strain may be selected which modulates the expression of the inserted sequences, or modifies and processes the gene product in the specific fashion desired. To detect expression of the SREBP pathway gene product, the expression vector can comprise a promoter operably linked to an SREBP pathway nucleic acid, one or more origins of replication, and, one or more selectable markers (e.g. thymidine kinase activity, resistance to antibiotics, etc.). Alternatively, recombinant expression vectors can be identified by assaying for the expression of the SREBP pathway gene product based on the physical or functional properties of the SREBP pathway protein in in vitro assay systems (e.g. immunoassays). The SREBP pathway protein, fragment, or derivative may be optionally expressed as a fusion, or chimeric protein product (i.e., joined via a peptide bond to a heterologous protein sequence of a different protein). A chimeric product can be made by ligating the appropriate nucleic acid sequences encoding the desired amino acid sequences to each other in the proper coding frame using standard methods and expressing the chimeric product. A chimeric product may also be made by protein synthetic techniques, e.g. by use of a peptide synthesizer. Once a recombinant that expresses the SREBP pathway gene sequence is identified, the gene product can be isolated and purified using standard methods (e.g. ion exchange, affinity, and gel exclusion chromatography; centrifugation; differential solubility; electrophoresis). The amino acid sequence of the protein can be deduced from the nucleotide sequence of the chimeric gene contained in the recombinant and can thus be synthesized by standard chemical methods (Hunkapiller et al, Nature (1984) 310:105-111). Alternatively, native SREBP pathway proteins can be purified from natural sources, by standard methods (e.g. immunoaffmity purification). SREBP pathway proteins SREBP pathway proteins of the invention comprise or consist of an amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, 6 or 8, or fragments or derivatives thereof. Compositions comprising these proteins may consist essentially of the SREBP pathway protein, fragments, or derivatives, or may comprise additional components (e.g. pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or excipients, culture media, etc.). SREPB pathway protein derivatives typically share a certain degree of sequence identity or sequence similarity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, and 8, or a fragment thereof. As used herein, "percent (%) amino acid sequence identity," with respect to a subject sequence, or a specified portion of a subject sequence, is defined as the percentage of amino acids in the candidate derivative amino acid sequence identical to the amino acid in the subject sequence (or specified portion thereof), after aligning the sequences and introducing gaps as necessary to achieve the maximum percent sequence identity as generated by BLAST (Altschul et al, supra) using the same parameters discussed above for derivative nucleic acid sequences. A % amino acid sequence identity value is determined by the number of matching identical amino acids divided by the sequence length for which the percent identity is being reported. "Percent (%) amino acid sequence similarity" is determined by doing the same calculation as for determining % amino acid sequence identity, but including conservative amino acid substitutions in addition to identical amino acids in the computation. A conservative amino acid substitution is one in which an amino acid is substituted for another amino acid having similar properties such that the folding or activity of the protein is not significantly affected. Aromatic amino acids that can be substituted for each other are phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine. Interchangeable hydrophobic amino acids are leucine, isoleucine, methionine, and valine. Interchangeable polar amino acids are glutamine and asparagine. Interchangeable basic amino acids are arginine, lysine and histidine. Interchangeable acidic amino acids are aspartic acid and glutamic acid; and interchangeable small amino acids are alanine, serine, cysteine, threonine, and glycine. In one preferred embodiment, an SREBP pathway protein derivative shares at least 75% sequence identity or similarity, preferably at least 80%o, more preferably at least 85%, still more preferably at least 90% and most preferably at least 95%> sequence identity or similarity with a contiguous stretch of at least 25 amino acids, preferably at least 50 amino acids, more preferably at least 100 amino acids, and in some cases, the entire length of any of SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 6, or 8. Other preferred derivatives of ceSREBP consist of or comprise an amino acid sequence that shares at least 75% similarity, preferably at least 80% similarity, and more preferably, at least 85% similarity with amino acid residues 335-428 of SEQ ID NO:2. Preferably, such derivatives share antigenicity with amino acid residues 335-428 of SEQ ID NO:2. Other preferred derivatives of dSCAP consist of or comprise an amino acid sequence that shares at least 75% similarity, preferably at least 80% similarity, and more preferably, at least 85% similarity with amino acid residues 812-848, 1005- 1041, 1045-1084, and 1088-1124 of SEQ ID NO:6, which constitute the WD repeats. Preferably, such derivatives share antigenicity with amino acid residues 812-848, 1005-1041, 1045-1084, and 1088-1124 of SEQ ID NO:6. In another embodiment, the dSIP protein derivative may consist of or comprise a sequence that shares 100%> similarity with any contiguous stretch of at least 33 amino acids, preferably at least 35 amino acids, more preferably at least 38 amino acids, and most preferably at least 43 amino acids of SEQ LD NO:8. Preferred derivatives of dSIP consist of or comprise an amino acid sequence that has at least 70%, preferably at least 80%o, more preferably at least 85%, still more preferably at least 90%, and most preferably at least 95% sequence identity or sequence similarity with any of amino acid residues 22-362, 384-457, and 521-993, which are extracellular or intracellular domains of dSIP. Another preferred derivative of dSIP protein consists of or comprises a sequence of at least 10 amino acids that share 100% similarity with an equivalent number of contiguous amino acids of residues 653-828 of SEQ ID NO:8. Preferred fragments of dSIP proteins consist or comprise at least 16, preferably at least 18, more preferably at least 21, and most preferably at least 26 contiguous amino acids of SEQ ID NO:2. Other preferred fragments include any 10 contiguous amino acids, preferably any 20 contiguous amino acids, and more preferably any 60 contiguous amino acids of residues 653-828 of SEQ ID NO:2. The fragment or derivative of an SREBP pathway protein is preferably "functionally active" meaning that the SREBP pathway protein derivative or fragment exhibits one or more functional activities associated with a full-length, wild-type SREBP pathway protein comprising the amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 6 or 8. As one example, a fragment or derivative may have antigenicity such that it can be used in immunoassays, for immunization, for inhibition of SREBP pathway activity, etc., as discussed further below regarding generation of antibodies to SREBP pathway proteins. As another example, a fragment or derivative of SREBP may be considered functionally active if it binds a regulatory DNA element of an appropriate target gene such as the SRE-1 sequence. SIP may be considered functionally active if it cleaves SREBP at site 1 (as depicted in Fig. IB). S2P may be considered functionally active if it cleaves SREBP at site 2. A fragment or derivative of SCAP may be considered functionally active if it binds to the C-terminal, regulatory domain of SREBP. The functional activity of SREBP pathway proteins, derivatives and fragments can be assayed by various methods known to one skilled in the art (Current Protocols in Protein Science (1998) Coligan et al, eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Somerset, New Jersey). In a preferred method, which is described in detail below, a model organism, such as an insect (e.g., Drosophila) or worm (e.g., C. elegans), or other model system, is used in genetic studies to assess the phenotypic effect of a fragment or derivative (i.e. mutant). The SREBP pathway derivatives can be produced by various methods known in the art. The manipulations that result in their production can occur at the gene or protein level. For example, a cloned SREBP pathway gene sequence can be cleaved at appropriate sites with restriction endonuclease(s) (Wells et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London SerA (1986) 317:415), followed by further enzymatic modification if desired, isolated, and ligated in vitro, and expressed to produce the desired derivative. Alternatively, an SREBP pathway gene can be mutated in vitro or in vivo, to create and/or destroy translation, initiation, and/or termination sequences, or to create variations in coding regions and/or to form new restriction endonuclease sites or to destroy preexisting ones, to facilitate further in vitro modification. A variety of mutagenesis techniques are known in the art such as chemical mutagenesis, in vitro site-directed mutagenesis (Carter et al, Nucl. Acids Res. (1986) 13:4331), use of TAB ® linkers (available from Pharmacia and Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI), etc. At the protein level, manipulations include post translational modification, e.g. glycosylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, amidation, derivatization by known protecting/blocking groups, proteolytic cleavage, linkage to an antibody molecule or other cellular ligand, etc. Any of numerous chemical modifications may be carried out by known technique (e.g. specific chemical cleavage by cyanogen bromide, trypsin, chymotrypsin, papain, V8 protease, NaBH , acetylation, formylation, oxidation, reduction, metabolic synthesis in the presence of tunicamycin, etc.). Derivative proteins can also be chemically synthesized by use of a peptide synthesizer, for example to introduce nonclassical amino acids or chemical amino acid analogs as substitutions or additions into the SREBP pathway protein sequence. Chimeric or fusion proteins can be made comprising an SREBP pathway protein or fragment thereof (preferably comprising one or more structural or functional domains of the SREBP pathway protein) joined at its amino- or carboxy- terminus via a peptide bond to an amino acid sequence of a different protein. Chimeric proteins can be produced by any known method. These include: recombinant expression of a nucleic acid encoding the protein (comprising an SREBP pathway coding sequence joined in-frame to a coding sequence for a different protein), ligating the appropriate nucleic acid sequences encoding the desired amino acid sequences to each other in the proper coding frame and expressing the chimeric product, and protein synthetic techniques (e.g. by use of a peptide synthesizer). SREBP pathway gene regulatory elements SREBP pathway gene regulatory DNA elements, such as enhancers or promoters can be used to identify tissues, cells, genes and factors that specifically control SREBP pathway protein production. In the case of dSIP, for instance, such regulatory elements reside within nucleotides 1 to 61 of SEQ ID NO:7. Preferably at least 20, more preferably at least 25, and most preferably at least 50 contiguous nucleotides within nucleotides 1 to 61 of SEQ ID NO:7 are used. Analyzing components that are specific to SREBP pathway protein function can lead to an understanding of how to manipulate these regulatory processes, especially therapeutic applications, as well as an understanding of how to diagnose dysfunction in these processes. Gene fusions with the SREBP pathway regulatory elements can be made. For compact genes that have relatively few and small intervening sequences, such as those described herein for Drosophila, the regulatory elements that control spatial and temporal expression patterns are typically found in the DNA immediately upstream of the coding region, extending to the nearest neighboring gene. Regulatory regions can be used to construct gene fusions where the regulatory DNAs are operably fused to a coding region for a reporter protein whose expression is easily detected, and these constructs are introduced as transgenes into the animal of choice. An entire regulatory DNA region can be used, or the regulatory region can be divided into smaller segments to identify sub-elements that might be specific for controlling expression a given cell type or stage of development. Reporter proteins that can be used for construction of these gene fusions include E. coli beta-galactosidase and green fluorescent protein (GFP). These can be detected readily in situ, and thus are useful for histological studies and can be used to sort cells that express SREBP pathway proteins (O'Kane and Gehring PNAS (1987) 84(24):9123-9127; Chalfie et al, Science (1994) 263:802-805; and Cumberledge and Krasnow (1994) Methods in Cell Biology 44:143-159). Recombinase proteins, such as FLP or ere, can be used in controlling gene expression through site-specific recombination (Golic and Lindquist (1989) Cell 59(3):499-509; White et al, Science (1996) 271 :805-807). Toxic proteins, such as the reaper and hid cell death proteins are useful to specifically ablate cells that normally express SREBP pathway proteins in order to assess the physiological function of the cells. (Kingston, In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (1998) Ausubel et al, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. sections 12.0.3-12.10). Alternatively, a binary reporter system can be used, similar to that described further below, where an SREBP pathway gene's regulatory element is operably fused to the coding region of an exogenous transcriptional activator protein, such as the GAL4 or tTA activators described below, to create a SREBP pathway "driver gene". For the other half of the binary system the exogenous activator controls a separate "target gene" containing a coding region of a reporter protein operably fused to a cognate regulatory element for the exogenous activator protein, such as UAS G or a tTA-response element, respectively. An advantage of a binary system is that a single driver gene construct can be used to activate transcription from pre-constructed target genes encoding different reporter proteins, each with its own uses as delineated above. Reporter gene fusions with an SREBP pathway gene's regulatory element are also useful for testing genetic interactions, in order to identify genes that control the expression of SREBP pathway genes, or promote the growth and differentiation of the tissues that expresses the SREBP pathway protein. SREBP pathway gene regulatory DNA elements are also useful in protein-DNA binding assays to identify gene regulatory proteins that control the expression of SREBP pathway genes. The gene regulatory proteins can be detected using a variety of methods that probe specific protein-DNA interactions well known to those skilled in the art (Kingston, supra). These include in vivo footprinting assays based on protection of DNA sequences from chemical and enzymatic modification within living or permeabilized cells or protection of DNA sequences from chemical or enzymatic modification using protein extracts, nitrocellulose filter-binding assays, and gel electrophoresis mobility shift assays using radioactively labeled regulatory DNA elements mixed with protein extracts. Candidate SREBP pathway gene regulatory proteins can be purified using a combination of conventional and DNA-affinity purification techniques. Molecular cloning strategies can also be used to identify proteins that specifically bind SREBP pathway gene regulatory DNA elements. For example, a Drosophila cDNA library in an expression vector can be screened for cDNAs that encode SREBP pathway gene regulatory element DNA-binding activity. Similarly, the yeast "one-hybrid" system can be used (Li and Herskowitz, Science (1993) 262:1870-1874; Luo et al, Biotechniques (1996) 20(4):564-568; Vidal et al, PNAS (1996) 93(19):10315- 10320). Identification of molecules that interact with SREBP pathway proteins A variety of methods can be used to identify or screen for molecules, such as proteins or small molecules, which interact with SREBP pathway proteins, or with derivatives or fragments thereof. The assays may employ a purified SREBP pathway protein, or cell lines or model organisms such as Drosophila and C. elegans that have been genetically engineered to express an SREBP pathway protein. Suitable screening methodologies are well known in the art to test for proteins and other molecules that interact with SREBP pathway genes and proteins (see e.g., PCT International Publication No. WO 96/34099). The newly identified interacting molecules may provide new targets for pharmaceutical agents. A variety of exogenous molecules, both naturally occurring and/or synthetic (e.g., libraries of small molecules or peptides, or phage display libraries), may be screened for binding capacity. In a typical binding experiment, the SREBP pathway protein or fragment is mixed with candidate molecules under conditions conducive to binding, sufficient time is allowed for any binding to occur, and assays are performed to test for bound complexes. Assays to find interacting proteins can be performed by any method known in the art. Examples include immunoprecipitation with an antibody that binds to the protein in a complex followed by analysis by size fractionation of the immunoprecipitated proteins (e.g. by denaturing or nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis), Western analysis, non-denaturing gel electrophoresis, etc. Identification of interacting proteins Two-hybrid assay systems A preferred method for identifying interacting proteins is a two-hybrid assay system or variation thereof (Fields and Song, Nature (1989) 340:245-246; U.S. Pat. No. 5,283,173; for review see Brent and Finley, Annu. Rev. Genet. (1997) 31 :663- 704). The most commonly used two-hybrid screen system is performed using yeast. All systems share three elements: 1) a gene that directs the synthesis of a "bait" protein fused to a DNA binding domain; 2) one or more "reporter" genes having an upstream binding site for the bait, and 3) a gene that directs the synthesis of a "prey" protein fused to an activation domain that activates transcription of the reporter gene. For screening proteins that interact with an SREBP pathway protein, the "bait" is preferably an SREBP pathway protein, expressed as a fusion protein to a DNA binding domain. The "prey" protein is a protein to be tested for ability to interact with the bait, which is expressed as a fusion protein to a transcription activation domain. The prey proteins can be obtained from recombinant biological libraries expressing random peptides. The bait fusion protein can be constructed using any suitable DNA binding domain, such as the E. coli LexA repressor protein, or the yeast GAL4 protein (Bartel et al, BioTechniques (1993) 14:920-924, Chasman et al, Mol. Cell. Biol. (1989) 9:4746-4749; Ma et al, Cell (1987) 48:847-853; Ptashne et al, Nature (1990) 346:329-331). The prey fusion protein can be constructed using any suitable activation domain such as GAL4, VP-16, etc. The preys may contain useful moieties such as nuclear localization signals (Ylikomi et al, EMBO J. (1992) 1 1 :3681-3694; Dingwall and Laskey, Trends Biochem. Sci. Trends Biochem. Sci. (1991) 16:479-481) or epitope tags (Allen et al, Trends Biochem. Sci. Trends Biochem. Sci. (1995) 20:511- 516) to facilitate isolation of the encoded proteins. A limitation of the two-hybrid system occurs when transmembrane portions of proteins in the bait or the prey fusions are used. This occurs because most two-hybrid systems are designed to function by formation of a functional transcription activator complex within the nucleus. The use of transmembrane portions of the protein can interfere with proper association, folding, and nuclear transport of bait or prey segments (Ausubel et al, supra; Allen et al, Trends Biochem. Sci. (1995) 20:511- 516). Since SREBP, SCAP, SIP, and S2P all contain membrane- spanning domains, the "bait" is preferably an SREBP pathway protein derivative or a fragment that lacks transmembrane domains. Any reporter gene can be used that has a detectable phenotype such as reporter genes that allow cells expressing them to be selected by growth on appropriate medium (e.g. HIS3, LEU2 described by Chien et al, PNAS (1991) 88:9572-9582; and Gyuris et al, Cell (1993) 75:791-803). Other reporter genes, such as LacZ and GFP, allow cells expressing them to be visually screened (Chien et al, supra). After interacting proteins have been identified, the DNA sequences encoding the proteins can be isolated. Antibodies and immunoassays SREBP pathway proteins encoded by SEQ ID NOs:2, 4 , 6 and 8, and derivatives and fragments thereof, such as those discussed above, may be used as immunogens to generate monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies and antibody fragments or derivatives (e.g. chimeric, single chain, Fab fragments). Antibodies to a particular domain of an SREBP pathway protein, such as the SRE binding domain, may be desired. In a specific embodiment, fragments of an SREBP pathway protein identified as hydrophilic are used as immunogens for antibody production using art-known methods. Various known methods for antibody production include production of monoclonal antibodies in germ-free animals (PCT/US90/02545), human or other hybridomas (Cole et al, PNAS (1983) 80:2026-2030; Cole et al, in Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy (1985) Alan R. Liss, pp. 77-96), and production of humanized antibodies (Jones et al, Nature (1986) 321 :522-525; U.S. Pat. 5,530,101). In a particular embodiment, SREBP pathway polypeptide fragments provide specific antigens and/or immunogens, especially when coupled to carrier proteins. For example, peptides are covalently coupled to keyhole limpet antigen (KLH) and the conjugate is emulsified in Freund's complete adjuvant. Laboratory rabbits are immunized according to conventional protocol and bled. The presence of specific antibodies is assayed by solid phase immunosorbent assays using immobilized corresponding polypeptide. Specific activity or function of the antibodies produced may be determined by convenient in vitro, cell-based, or in vivo assays: e.g. in vitro binding assays, etc. Binding affinity may be assayed by determination of equilibrium constants of antigen-antibody association (usually at least about 10 7 M "1 , preferably at least about 10 8 M "1 , more preferably at least about 10 9 M "1 ). immunoassays can be used to identify proteins that interact with or bind to SREBP pathway proteins. Various assays are available for testing the ability of a protein to bind to or compete with binding to a wild-type SREBP pathway protein or for binding to an anti-SREBP pathway protein antibody. Suitable assays include radioimmunoassays, ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay), immunoradiometric assays, gel diffusion precipitin reactions, immunodiffusion assays, in situ immunoassays (e.g., using colloidal gold, enzyme or radioisotope labels), western blots, precipitation reactions, agglutination assays (e.g., gel agglutination assays, hemagglutination assays), complement fixation assays, immunofluorescence assays, protein A assays, immunoelectrophoresis assays, etc. Identification of interacting compounds Once new SREBP pathway genes or SREBP pathway interacting genes are identified, they can be assessed as potential drug or pesticide targets. Putative drugs and molecules can be applied onto whole insects, nematodes, and other small invertebrate metazoans, and the ability of the compounds to modulate (e.g. block or enhance) SREBP pathway activity can be observed. Alternatively, the effect of various compounds on SREBP pathways can be assayed using cells that have been engineered to express one or more SREBP pathways and associated proteins. Assays of compounds on nematodes In a typical worm assay, the compounds to be tested are dissolved in DMSO or other organic solvent, mixed with a bacterial suspension at various test concentrations, preferably OP50 strain of bacteria (Brenner, Genetics (1974) 110:421-440), and supplied as food to the worms. The population of worms to be treated can be synchronized larvae (Sulston and Hodgkin, in The Nematode C. elegans (1988) Wood, ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring harbor, New York) or adults or a mixed-stage population of animals. Adult and larval worms are treated with different concentrations of compounds, typically ranging from 1 mg/ml to 0.001 mg/ml. Behavioral aberrations, such as a decrease in motility and growth, and morphological aberrations, sterility, and death are examined in both acutely and chronically treated adult and larval worms. For the acute assay, larval and adult worms are examined immediately after application of the compound and re-examined periodically (every 30 minutes) for 5-6 hours. Chronic or long-term assays are performed on worms and the behavior of the treated worms is examined every 8-12 hours for 4-5 days. In some circumstances, it is necessary to reapply the compound to the treated worms every 24 hours for maximal effect. Assays of compounds on insects Compounds can be administered to insects in a variety of ways, including orally (including addition to synthetic diet, application to plants or prey to be consumed by the test organism), topically (including spraying, direct application of compound to animal, allowing animal to contact a treated surface), or by injection. Hydrophobic molecules must commonly be dissolved in organic solvents, which are allowed to evaporate in the case of methanol or acetone, or at low concentrations can be included to facilitate uptake (ethanol, dimethyl sulfoxide). The first step in an insect assay is usually the determination of the minimal lethal dose (MLD) on the insects after a chronic exposure to the compounds. The compounds are usually diluted in DMSO, and applied to the food surface bearing 0-48 hour old embryos and larvae. In addition to MLD, this step allows the determination of the fraction of eggs that hatch, behavior of the larvae, such as how they move /feed compared to untreated larvae, the fraction that survive to pupate, and the fraction that eclose (emergence of the adult insect from puparium). Based on these results more detailed assays with shorter exposure times may be designed, and larvae might be dissected to look for obvious morphological defects. Once the MLD is determined, more specific acute and chronic assays can be designed. In a typical acute assay, compounds are applied to the food surface for embryos, larvae, or adults, and the animals are observed after 2 hours and after an overnight incubation. For application on embryos, defects in development and the percent that survive to adulthood are determined. For larvae, defects in behavior, locomotion, and molting may be observed. For application on adults, behavior and neurological defects are observed, and effects on fertility are noted. For a chronic exposure assay, adults are placed on vials containing the compounds for 48 hours, then transferred to a clean container and observed for fertility, neurological defects, and death. Assay of compounds using cell cultures Compounds that modulate (e.g. block or enhance) SREBP pathway activity may also be assayed using cell culture. In one embodiment, compounds that alter the protease activity of SIP are tested. Various compounds added to cells expressing dSIP and/or other SREBP pathway genes may be screened for their ability to modulate the activity of SREBP pathway genes based upon measurements of protease activity. Assays for changes in protease activity can be performed on cultured cells expressing endogenous normal or mutant SREBP pathway genes. Such studies also can be performed on cells transfected with vectors capable of expressing these genes, or their functional domains. In addition, to enhance the signal measured in such assays, cells may be cotransfected with genes encoding dSIP proteins. For example, cells may be transfected with soluble or membrane bound dSIP, and lysed. The lysates may be analyzed for ability to process peptides corresponding to cleavage of fly SREBP at site 1, in presence or absence of compounds, using a fluorogenic peptide assay essentially as described (Cheng D. et al, J. Biol. Chem. (1999) 274:22805-22812). Compounds that selectively modulate the dSIP activity are identified as potential drug candidates having dSIP specificity. Identification of small molecules and compounds as potential pharmaceutical compounds from large chemical libraries requires high-throughput screening (HTS) methods (Bolger, Drug Discovery Today (1999) 4 251-253) Several of the assays mentioned herein can lend themselves to such screening methods For example, cells or cell lines expressing wild type or mutant dSIP protein or deπvatives, and a reporter gene, can be treated with compounds of interest Interactions can be measured using a vaπety of methods depending on the reporter genes, such as color detection, fluorescence detection (e g GFP), autoradiography, scintillation analysis, etc In vivo and in vitro models of SREBP pathway gene function and dysfunction Both in vivo models, genetically modified animal models such as C elegans and Drosophύa, and in vitro models such as genetically engineered cell lines expressing or mis-expressing SREBP pathway genes, are useful for studying hpid metabolism and disorders associated with abnormal hpid metabolism Such models that display detectable phenotypes, such as those described in more detail below and in the examples, can be used for the identification and characteπzation of SREBP pathway genes or other genes of interest and/or phenotypes associated with the mutation or mis-expression of an SREBP pathway protein The term "mis- expression" as used herein encompasses mis-expression due to gene mutations Thus, a mis-expressed SREBP pathway protein may be one having an ammo acid sequence that differs from wild type (i e it is a derivative of the normal protein) A mis- expressed SREBP pathway protein may also be one m which one or more ammo acids have been deleted, and thus is a "fragment" of the normal protein As used herein, "mis-expression" also includes over-expression (e g by multiple gene copies), underexpression, and non-expression (e g by gene knockout or blocking expression that would otherwise normally occur) As used in the following discussion concerning in vivo and in vitro models, the term "gene of interest" refers to an SREBP pathway gene (i e SREBP, SCAP, SIP, and S2P), or any gene involved in regulation or modulation of the SREBP pathway Such genes may include any gene involved in the biosynthesis or metabolism of cholesterol or fatty acids such as HMG coenzyme A synthase, HMG-CoA reductase, farnesyl diphosphate synthase, squalene synthase, fatty acid synthase, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase, acyl-CoA binding protein, stearoyl CoA desaturase-1, hpoprotem hpase, and the LDL receptor. The in vivo and in vitro models may be genetically engineered or modified so that they 1) have deletions and/or insertions of one or more SREBP pathway genes, 2) harbor interfering RNA sequences deπved from SREBP pathway genes, 3) have had one or more endogenous SREBP pathway genes mutated (e.g. contain deletions, insertions, rearrangements, or point mutations in SREBP pathway gene or other genes in the pathway), and/or 4) contain transgenes for mis-expression of wild-type or mutant forms of such genes. Such genetically modified in vivo and in vitro models are useful for identification of new genes that are involved in the synthesis, activation, control, etc. of SREBP pathway genes and/or gene products. Further, other genes of interest that are involved in cholesterol and/or fatty acid biosynthesis or metabolism may be identified. The newly identified genes could constitute possible pesticide targets (as judged by animal model phenotypes such as non-viability, block of normal development, defective feeding, defective movement, or defective reproduction). Alternatively, or additionally, they may constitute possible therapeutic targets, particularly in the area of metabolic diseases and disorders, for example, cholesterol synthesis, metabolism, and other fatty acid disorders. The model systems can also be used to test potential pesticidal or pharmaceutical compounds that interact with the SREBP pathway. For example, the compound can be administered to the model system using any suitable method (e.g. direct contact, ingestion, injection), and any changes in phenotype, such as changes in lipid content or lethality, can be observed. Various genetic engineering and expression modification methods that can be used are well known in the art, including chemical mutagenesis, transposon mutagenesis, antisense RNAi, dsRNAi, and transgene-mediated mis-expression. Generating loss-of-function mutations by mutagenesis Loss-of-function mutations in an invertebrate metazoan SREBP pathway genes can be generated by any of several mutagenesis methods known in the art (Ashburner, Drosophila melanogaster: A Laboratory Manual (1989), Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: pp. 299-418; Greenspan RJ, Fly pushing: The Theory and Practice of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics (1997) Cold Spring Harbor Press, Plainview, NY; Wood supra). Techniques for producing mutations in a gene or genome include use of radiation (e.g., X-ray, UV, or gamma ray); chemicals (e.g., EMS, MMS, ENU, formaldehyde, etc.); and insertional mutagenesis by mobile elements including dysgenesis induced by transposon insertions, or transposon- mediated deletions, for example, male recombination, as described below. Other methods of reducing expression of genes include antisense; double-stranded RNA interference; peptide and RNA aptamers; directed deletions; homologous recombination; dominant negative alleles; and intrabodies. Generating loss-function phenotypes by transposon insertion or excision Transposable elements are particularly useful for inserting sequences into a gene of interest so that the encoded protein is not properly expressed, creating a "knock-out" animal having a loss-of-function phenotype. There are several suitable transposable elements that can be used. Techniques are well-established for the use of P element in Drosophila (Rubin and Spradling, Science (1982) 218:348-53; U.S. Pat. No. 4,670,388) and Tel in C. elegans (Zwaal et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (1993) 90:7431-7435; and Caenorhabditis elegans: Modern Biological Analysis of an Organism (1995) Epstein and Shakes, eds.). Other Tcl-like transposable elements can be used such as minos, mariner and sleeping beauty, as well transposable elements that function in a variety of insect species, such as PiggyBac, hobo, and hermes (Thibault et al, Insect Mol Biol (1999) 8:119-23). P elements, which contain one or more elements that allow detection of animals containing the P element, are preferred for the isolation of loss-of-function mutations in Drosophila SREBP pathway genes. Most often, marker genes are used that affect the eye color of Drosophila, such as derivatives of the Drosophila white or rosy genes (Rubin and Spradling, Science (1982) 218(4570):348-353; and Klemenz et al, Nucleic Acids Res. (1987) 15(10):3947-3959). However, in principle, any gene can be used as a marker that causes a reliable and easily scored phenotypic change in transgenic animals. Various other markers include bacterial plasmid sequences having selectable markers such as ampicillin resistance (Steller and Pirrotta, EMBO. J. (1985) 4:167-171); and lacZ sequences fused to a weak general promoter to detect the presence of enhancers with a developmental expression pattern of interest (Bellen et al, Genes Dev. (1989) 3(9):1288-1300). Other examples of marked P elements useful for mutagenesis have been reported (Nucleic Acids Research (1998) 26:85-88; and http://flybase.bio.indiana.edu). Recently, a transgenesis system was described that may be suitable for following gene transfer in eye-bearing animals of diverse insect and other species (Berghammer et al, Nature (1999) 402:370-371). An artificial promoter that is universally expressed and restricted to eye tissue drives expression of a universal marker, such as GFP. The preferred promoter contains three binding sites for Pax-6 homodimers in front of a TATA box, (Sheng et al, Genes Devel. (1997) 11:1122- 1131). The system is transferred via a vector capable of delivering transgenes to a broad range of animal species, such as transposon-based vectors derived from Hermes, piggyBac, or mariner, or pantropic retro viruses (Jordan et al, Insect Mol Biol (1998) 7: 215-222; U.S. Pat. No.5,670,345). Various research groups have created large collections of P-insertions that generate new loss-of-function mutations upon random insertion in the genome (Spradling et al, Genetics (1999) 153:135-77). Since the sequence of the P elements is known, the genomic sequence flanking each transposon insert is determined either by plasmid rescue (Hamilton et al, PNAS (1991) 88:2731-2735) or by inverse polymerase chain reaction (Rehm, http://www.fruitfly.org/methods/) to determine if the P is in a gene of interest. A preferred method of transposon mutagenesis in Drosophila employs the "local hopping" method described by Tower et al. (Genetics (1993) 133:347-359). Each new P insertion line can be tested molecularly for transposition of the P element into the gene of interest (e.g. dSIP) by assays based on PCR. For each reaction, one PCR primer is used that is homologous to sequences contained within the P element and a second primer is homologous to the coding region or flanking regions of the gene of interest. Products of the PCR reactions are detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. The sizes of the resulting DNA fragments reveal the site of P element insertion relative to the gene of interest. Alternatively, Southern blotting and restriction mapping using DNA probes derived from genomic DNA or cDNAs of the gene of interest can be used to detect transposition events that rearrange the genomic DNA of the gene. P transposition events that map to the gene of interest can be assessed for phenotypic effects in heterozygous or homozygous mutant Drosophila. In another embodiment, Drosophila lines carrying P insertions in the gene of interest, can be used to generate localized deletions using "imprecise excision" methods (Kaiser, Bioessays (1990) 12(6):297-301; Harnessing the power of Drosophila genetics, In Drosophila melanogaster: Practical Uses in Cell and Molecular Biology, Goldstein and Fyrberg, Eds., Academic Press, Inc. San Diego, California). This is particularly useful if no P element transpositions are found that disrupt the gene of interest. Briefly, flies containing P elements inserted near the gene of interest are exposed to a further round of transposase to induce excision of the element. Progeny in which the transposon has excised are typically identified by loss of the eye color marker associated with the transposable element. The resulting progeny will include flies with either precise or imprecise excision of the P element, where the imprecise excision events often result in deletion of genomic DNA neighboring the site of P insertion. Such progeny are screened by molecular techniques to identify deletion events that remove genomic sequence from the gene of interest, and assessed for phenotypic effects in heterozygous and homozygous mutant Drosophila. We have used this method to generate a small deletion in the enhancer/5' UTR region of Drosophila SREBP. While the original P-element insertion in this region was not lethal to the animal, the corresponding excision, which left most of the P-element intact and removed -450 bp of genomic DNA, was homozygous lethal and was lethal over a large deficiency that removes Drosophila SREBP. The deletion allele may be used to isolate further mutations in the gene and to further investigate the function of Drosophila SREBP. P-element mobilization can further generate chromosomal deletions and duplications by the process of "male recombination (Preston et al, Genetics (1996) 144:1623-38)". P-mediated germ line recombination (i.e., cross-over events between paired chromosomes in the germline) occurs in both males and females but is more conspicuous in the males, where recombination is usually absent. Male recombination frequently induces deletions and reciprocal duplications of the adjacent chromosomal DNA. In C. elegans, Tel transposable element can be used for directed mutagenesis of a gene of interest. Typically, a Tel library is prepared by the methods of Zwaal et al, supra and Plasterk, supra, using a strain in which the Tel transposable element is highly mobile and present in a high copy number. The library is screened for Tel insertions in the region of interest using PCR with one set of primers specific for Tel sequence and one set of gene-specific primers and C. elegans strains that contain Tel transposon insertions within the gene of interest are isolated. Frequently, Tel insertions do not fully disrupt the function of a gene due to insertion into non-coding sequence or the ability of the host transcriptional machinery to bypass the effect of the insertion. In this case, imprecise excision of the Tel element may be used to identify a deletion in the gene of interest. As described in detail in the Examples, we used this method of Tel insertion followed by imprecise excision to generate a partial deletion allele of ceSREBP. Generating loss-of-function phenotypes using RNA-based methods SREBP pathway genes may be identified and/or characterized by generating loss-of-function phenotypes in animals of interest through RNA-based methods, such as antisense RNA (Schubiger and Edgar, Methods in Cell Biology (1994) 44:697- 713). One form of the antisense RNA method involves the injection of embryos with an antisense RNA that is partially homologous to the gene of interest (in this case any of the SREBP pathways genes of SEQ ID NO: 1, 3, 5, or 7). Another form of the antisense RNA method involves expression of an antisense RNA partially homologous to the gene of interest by operably joining a portion of the gene of interest in the antisense orientation to a powerful promoter that can drive the expression of large quantities of antisense RNA, either generally throughout the animal or in specific tissues. Antisense RNA-generated loss-of-function phenotypes have been reported previously for several Drosophila genes including cactus, pecanex, and Krύppel (LaBonne et al, Dev. Biol. (1989) 136(1).1-16; Schuh and Jackie, Genome (1989) 31(l):422-425, Geisler et al, Cell (1992) 71(4):613-621). Loss-of-function phenotypes can also be generated by cosuppression methods (Bmgham Cell (1997) 90(3):385-387; Smyth, Curr. Biol. (1997) 7(12):793-795; Que and Jorgensen, Dev. Genet. (1998) 22(1):100-109). Cosuppression is a phenomenon of reduced gene expression produced by expression or injection of a sense strand RNA corresponding to a partial segment of the gene of interest. Cosuppression effects have been employed extensively in plants and C elegans to generate loss-of- function phenotypes, and there is a single report of cosuppression in Drosophila, where reduced expression of the Adh gene was induced from a white- Adh transgene using cosuppression methods (Pal-Bhadra et al, Cell (1997) 90(3) 479-490) Another method for generating loss-of-function phenotypes is by double- stranded RNA interference This method is based on the interfeπng properties of double-stranded RNA deπved from the coding regions of gene, and has proven to be of great utility in genetic studies of C elegans (Fire et al, Nature (1998) 391 806- 811), and can also be used to generate loss-of-function phenotypes m Drosophila (Kennerdell and Carthew, Cell (1998) 95-1017-1026; Misqmtta and Patterson PNAS (1999) 96:1451-1456) In one example of this method, complementary sense and antisense RNAs deπved from a substantial portion of a gene of interest, such as an SREBP pathway gene, are synthesized in vitro. The resulting sense and antisense RNAs are annealed in an injection buffer, and the double-stranded RNA injected or otherwise introduced into animals Progeny of the injected animals are then inspected for phenotypes of interest (PCT publication no WO99/32619). In another embodiment of the method, the dsRNA can be delivered to the animal by bathing the animal in a solution containing a sufficient concentration of the dsRNA. In another embodiment of the method, dsRNA deπved from SREBP pathway genes can be generated in vivo by simultaneous expression of both sense and antisense RNA from appropπately positioned promoters operably fused to the SREBP pathway gene sequence in both sense and antisense orientations. In yet another embodiment of the method the dsRNA can be delivered to the animal by engineering expression of dsRNA within cells of a second organism that serves as food for the animal. Examples include engineering expression of dsRNA in E. coli bacteria that are fed to C. elegans, engineering expression of dsRNA in baker's yeast which is fed to Drosophila, or engineering expression of dsRNA in transgenic plants that are fed to plant-eating insects such as Leptinotarsa or Hehothis. We have used dsRNAi injection, soaking, and feeding methods in C. elegans to generate specific intestinal phenotypes, as discussed in detail in Example 5. We have also used dsRNAi injection into Drosophila embryos. For this experiment, dsRNA fragments were generated that spanned the amino-terminal ~2kb of the coding sequence of Drosophila SREBP. Animals that were injected as early embryos generally died during larval development, demonstrating that Drosophila SREBP is essential for viability. Recently, RNAi has been successfully used in cultured Drosophila cells to inhibit expression of targeted proteins (Dixon lab, University of Michigan, http://dixonlab.biochem.med.umich.edu/protocols/RNAiExperiments.html). Thus, cell lines in culture can be manipulated using RNAi both to perturb and study the function of SREBP pathway components and to validate the efficacy of therapeutic strategies that involve the manipulation of this pathway. The observation that RNAi can selectively inactivate one or more genes simultaneously in Drosophila tissue culture cells provides an additional means of screening for genes that regulate SREBP activation. In this screen RNAi suppresses expression of a regulatory gene and thus mimics the function of a drug that specifically targets that gene function. The procedure for carrying out RNAi in Drosophila tissue culture cells can be carried out on a large scale such that part or all the genes in the Drosophila genome are inactivated by RNAi and tested as potential regulatory genes. Based on ESTs and sequence from the complete Drosophila genome, a library of double stranded RNAi molecules directed against these genes is constructed by in vitro transcription from convergently oriented T7 promoters. The sense and antisense RNA strands are annealed and arrayed into 96-well plates with each well containing a different RNAi molecule directed against a different gene in the genome. Aliquots of Drosophila tissue culture cells, such as wild type S2 or S2 cells specifically engineered to assay for SREBP function, are placed in the wells of a 96- well plate. An aliquot of each of the 96 different dsRNAs from the RNAi library is added to a different well containing the Drosophila cells. Each well of the 96 well plate thus contains a different RNAi molecule directed against a different gene in the genome. Following the introduction of the RNAi library, the cells are assayed for SREBP activation. Such assays can measure a decrease in membrane-bound SREBP, SREBP translocation to the nucleus, SREBP phosphorylation, or increased transcription of SREBP transcriptional or indirect target genes (such as fatty acid synthase or ATP citrate lyase - as described in the section "Assays for Change in Gene Expression"). A change in the activation of SREBP in RNAi treated cells and not control cells indicates that the RNAi molecule directed against that regulator gene is causing this change. Assays can be designed to uncover genes that either up- regulate or down-regulate the activation of SREBP. Generating loss-of-function phenotypes using peptide and RNA aptamers Another method for generating loss-of-function phenotypes is by the use of peptide aptamers, which are peptides or small polypeptides that act as dominant inhibitors of protein function. Peptide aptamers specifically bind to target proteins, blocking their function ability (Kolonin and Finley, PNAS (1998) 95:14266-14271). Due to the highly selective nature of peptide aptamers, they may be used not only to target a specific protein, but also to target specific functions of a given protein (e.g. proteolytic function). Further, peptide aptamers may be expressed in a controlled fashion by use of promoters which regulate expression in a temporal, spatial or inducible manner. Peptide aptamers act dominantly; therefore, they can be used to analyze proteins for which loss-of-function mutants are not available. Peptide aptamers that bind with high affinity and specificity to a target protein may be isolated by a variety of techniques known in the art. In one method, they are isolated from random peptide libraries by yeast two-hybrid screens (Xu et al. , PNAS (1997) 94:12473-12478). They can also be isolated from phage libraries (Hoogenboom et al, Immunotechnology (1998) 4:1-20) or chemically generated peptides/libraries. RNA aptamers are specific RNA ligands for proteins that can specifically inhibit protein function of the gene (Good et al, Gene Therapy (1997) 4:45-54; Ellington, et al, Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. (1995) 1 :185-214). In vitro selection methods can be used to identify RNA aptamers having a selected specificity (Bell et al, J. Biol. Chem. (1998) 273:14309-14314). It has been demonstrated that RNA aptamers can inhibit protein function in Drosophila (Shi et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA (1999) 96:10033-10038). Accordingly, RNA aptamers can be used to decrease the expression of an SREBP pathway protein or derivative thereof, or a protein that interacts with an SREBP pathway protein. Transgenic animals can be generated to test peptide or RNA aptamers in vivo (Kolonin, MG, and Finley, RL, Genetics, (1998) 95:4266-4271). For example, transgenic Drosophila lines expressing the desired aptamers may be generated by P element mediated transformation (discussed below). The phenotypes of the progeny expressing the aptamers can then be characterized. Generating loss of function phenotypes using intrabodies Intracellularly expressed antibodies, or intrabodies, are single-chain antibody molecules designed to specifically bind and inactivate target molecules inside cells. Intrabodies have been used in cell assays and in whole organisms such as Drosophila (Chen et al, Hum. Gen. Ther. (1994) 5:595-601; Hassanzadeh et al, Febs Lett. (1998) 16(1, 2):75-80 and 81-86). Inducible expression vectors can be constructed with intrabodies that react specifically with an SREBP pathway protein. These vectors can be introduced into model organisms and studied in the same manner as described above for aptamers. Transgenesis Typically, transgenic animals are created that contain gene fusions of the coding regions of an SREBP pathway gene (from either genomic DNA or cDNA) or genes engineered to encode antisense RNAs, cosuppression RNAs, interfering dsRNA, RNA aptamers, peptide aptamers, or intrabodies operably joined to a specific promoter and transcriptional enhancer whose regulation has been well characterized, usually heterologous promoters/enhancers (i.e. promoters/enhancers that are non- native to the SREBP pathway genes being expressed). Methods are well known for incorporating exogenous nucleic acid sequences into the genome of animals or cultured cells to create transgenic animals or recombinant cell lines. For invertebrate animal models, the most common methods involve the use of transposable elements. In addition to creating loss-of-function phenotypes, transposable elements can be used to incorporate the gene of interest, or mutant or derivative thereof, as an additional gene into any region of an animal's genome resulting in mis-expression of the gene. A preferred vector designed specifically for misexpression of genes in transgenic Drosophila, is derived from pGMR (Hay et al, Development (1994) 120:2121-2129). It is 9Kb long, and contains: an origin of replication for E. coli; an ampicillin resistance gene; P element transposon ends to mobilize the inserted sequences; a White marker gene; an expression unit comprising the TATA region of hsp70 enhancer and the 3 'untranslated region of α-tubulin gene. The expression unit contains a first multiple cloning site (MCS) designed for insertion of an enhancer and a second MCS located 500 bases downstream, designed for the insertion of a gene of interest. Homologous recombination or gene targeting techniques can be used to substitute a gene of interest for one or both copies of the animal's homologous gene. The transgene can be under the regulation of either an exogenous or an endogenous promoter element, and be inserted as either a minigene or a large genomic fragment. In one application, gene function can be analyzed by ectopic expression, using, for example, Drosophila (Brand et al, Methods in Cell Biology (1994) 44:635- 654) or C. elegans (Mello and Fire, Methods in Cell Biology (1995) 48:451-482). Genes are typically introduced into C. elegans via injection into the ovaries of young adult hermaphrodites. Circular DNA that is injected into nematodes at high concentrations generally concatamerizes to form "extrachromosomal arrays," which typically contain hundreds of copies of the injected sequences and are stably transmitted at rates of -10% to 90%>. X-ray irradiation of animals carrying the array can induce chromosomal integration of the transgenes (Epstein and Shakes, supra). In a preferred embodiment, gene fusions for directing the mis-expression of SREBP pathway genes are incorporated into a vector which is injected into nematodes along with a plasmid containing a dominant selectable marker, such as rol-6. Transgenic animals are identified as those exhibiting a roller phenotype, and the transgenic animals are inspected for additional phenotypes of interest created by mis-expression of the SREBP pathway gene. Examples of well-characterized heterologous promoters that may be used to create the transgenic animals include heat shock promoters/enhancers, which are useful for temperature induced mis-expression. In Drosophila, these include the hsplO and hsp83 genes, and in C. elegans, include hsp 16-2 and hsp 16-41. Tissue specific promoters/enhancers are also useful, and in Drosophila, include eyeless (Mozer and Benzer, Development (1994) 120:1049-1058), sevenless (Bowtell et al, PNAS (1991) 88(15):6853-6857), and g/αss-responsive promoters/enhancers (Quiring et al, Science (1994) 265:785-789) which are useful for expression in the eye; and enhancers/promoters derived from the dpp or vestigal genes which are useful for expression in the wing (Staehling-Hampton et al, Cell Growth Differ. (1994) 5(6):585-593; Kim et al, Nature (1996) 382:133-138). In C. elegans, examples of useful tissue specific promoters/enhancers include the myo-2 gene promoter, useful for pharyngeal muscle-specific expression; the hlh-1 gene promoter, useful for body- muscle-specific expression; and the gene promoter, useful for touch-neuron-specific gene expression. Finally, where it is necessary to restrict the activity of dominant active or dominant negative transgenes to regions where the pathway is normally active, it may be useful to use endogenous promoters of genes in the pathway, such as the SREBP pathway genes. In Drosophila, binary control systems that employ exogenous DNA are useful when testing the mis-expression of genes in a wide variety of developmental stage-specific and tissue-specific patterns. Two examples of binary exogenous regulatory systems include the UAS/GAL4 system from yeast (Hay et al, PNAS (1997) 94(10):5195-5200; Ellis et al, Development (1993) 119(3):855-865), and the "Tet system" derived from E. coli (Bello et al., Development (1998) 125:2193-2202). The UAS/GAL4 system is a well-established and powerful method of mis-expression in Drosophila which employs the UAS G upstream regulatory sequence for control of promoters by the yeast GAL4 transcriptional activator protein (Brand and Perrimon, Development (1993) 118(2):401-15). In this approach, transgenic Drosophila, termed "target" lines, are generated where the gene of interest to be mis-expressed is operably fused to an appropriate promoter controlled by UAS G - Other transgenic Drosophila strains, termed "driver" lines, are generated where the GAL4 coding region is operably fused to promoters/enhancers that direct the expression of the GAL4 activator protein in specific tissues, such as the eye, wing, nervous system, gut, or musculature. The gene of interest is not expressed in the target lines for lack of a transcriptional activator to drive transcription from the promoter joined to the gene of interest. However, when the UAS-target line is crossed with a GAL4 driver line, mis-expression of the gene of interest is induced in resulting progeny in a specific pattern that is characteristic for that GAL4 line. The technical simplicity of this approach makes it possible to sample the effects of directed mis- expression of the gene of interest in a wide variety of tissues by generating one transgenic target line with the gene of interest, and crossing that target line with a panel of pre-existing driver lines. In the "Tet" binary control system, transgenic Drosophila driver lines are generated where the coding region for a tetracycline-controlled transcriptional activator (tTA) is operably fused to promoters/enhancers that direct the expression of tTA in a tissue-specific and/or developmental stage-specific manner. The driver lines are crossed with transgenic Drosophila target lines where the coding region for the gene of interest to be mis-expressed is operably fused to a promoter that possesses a tTA-responsive regulatory element. When the resulting progeny are supplied with food supplemented with a sufficient amount of tetracycline, expression of the gene of interest is blocked. Expression of the gene of interest can be induced at will simply by removal of tetracycline from the food. Also, the level of expression of the gene of interest can be adjusted by varying the level of tetracycline in the food. Thus, the use of the Tet system as a binary control mechanism for mis-expression has the advantage of providing a means to control the amplitude and timing of mis-expression of the gene of interest, in addition to spatial control. Consequently, if a gene of interest (e.g. an SREBP pathway gene) has lethal or deleterious effects when mis-expressed at an early stage in development, such as the embryonic or larval stages, the function of the gene of interest in the adult can still be assessed by adding tetracycline to the food during early stages of development and removing tetracycline later so as to induce mis-expression only at the adult stage. Dominant negative mutations, which cause the mutant protein to interfere with the normal function of a wild-type copy of the protein and which can result in loss-of- function or reduced-function phenotypes in the presence of a normal copy of the gene, can be made using known methods (Hershkowitz, Nature (1987) 329:219-222). In the case of active monomeric proteins, overexpression of an inactive form, achieved, for example, by linking the mutant gene to a highly active promoter, can cause competition for natural substrates or ligands sufficient to significantly reduce net activity of the normal protein. Alternatively, changes to active site residues can be made to create a virtually irreversible association with a target. Assays for change in gene expression Various expression analysis techniques may be used to identify genes that are differentially expressed between a cell line or an animal expressing a wild type SREBP pathway gene compared to another cell line or animal expressing a mutant SREBP pathway gene. Such expression profiling techniques include differential display, serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE), transcript profiling coupled to a gene database query, nucleic acid array technology, subtractive hybridization, and proteome analysis (e.g. mass-spectrometry and two-dimensional protein gels). Nucleic acid array technology may be used to determine a global (i.e., genome-wide) gene expression pattern in a normal animal for comparison with an animal having a mutation in one or more SREBP gene. Gene expression profiling can also be used to identify other genes (or proteins) that may have a functional relation to SREBP pathway genes (e.g. may participate in a signaling pathway with these genes). The genes are identified by detecting changes in their expression levels following mutation, (i.e., insertion, deletion or substitution in, or over-expression, under- expression, mis-expression or knock-out) of the SREBP pathway gene. We used transcriptional profiling to identify genes that are up-regulated in flies that mis-express an activated form of Drosophila SREBP (dSREBP.CA) and are thus likely transcriptional targets or indirect targets of SREBP activation in the wild-type animal. As described below in Example 7, we generated a fly that mis-expressed dSREBP.CA in the larval fat body and appeared to have metabolic phenotypes. We isolated mRNA from the mutant and wild-type larvae, generated radioactively-labeled cDNA, and separately probed identical nylon filters that had been spotted with PCR products representing the Drosophila homologues of -80 mammalian metabolic genes. The signals from all spots on the filters were quantitated on a phosphoimager, and the normalized signals from corresponding spots on filters probed with wild type or mutant mRNA were compared. Our methods were adapted from the Atlas Array system (Clonetech, Palo Alto, CA). This analysis identified several genes that appeared to be up regulated in the mutant animals. Northern blot analysis, using mRNA from wild-type and mutant larvae and DNA probes made from the candidate target genes, confirmed results of the profiling experiments. The Drosophila homologues of fatty acid synthase and ATP citrate lyase were the most strongly up regulated, by factors of 10 and 4, respectively. Both genes contribute to the biosynthesis of fatty acids and are transcriptional targets of mammalian SREBPs. Knowledge of these targets provides means of assaying Drosophila SREBP activity in vivo or in vitro. To this end, reporter constructs can be generated that fuse these genes' regulatory elements to a reporter gene, such as GFP or lacZ. Such constructs can be introduced into animals or cells and used to assay genetic or chemical modifications that alter the activity of SREBP pathway proteins. Phenotypes associated with SREBP pathway gene mutations After isolati u of model animals carrying mutated or mis-expressed SREBP pathway genes or ii.nibitory RNAs, animals are carefully examined for phenotypes of interest. For analysis of SREBP pathway genes that have been mutated (i.e. deletions, insertions, and/or point mutations) animal models that are both homozygous and heterozygous for the altered SREBP pathway gene are analyzed. Examples of specific phenotypes that may be investigated include lethality; sterility; and changes in various characteristics of the animal such as motility, body shape, body size and weight, metabolism, lipid accumulation, feeding, development, morphogenesis of organs, brood size, hermotaxis, etc. Some phenotypes more specific to Drosophila include alterations in: morphogenesis of the peripheral sensory organs, imaginal discs, eye development, wing development, leg development, bristle development, antennae development, gut development, fat body, and musculature. Some phenotypes more specific to nematodes include: alterations in chemotaxis, a dauer constitutive phenotype, a dauer defective phenotype, and a pale-intestine phenotype. A phenotype of particular interest in C. elegans is the pale intestine phenotype, which is indicative of defects in lipid metabolism and is discussed in more detail below and in the Examples. Both the partial deletion allele of ceSREBP, described above, and dsRNAi using ceSREBP gene fragments produces this pale intestine phenotype. Genomic sequences containing an SREBP pathway gene can be used to confirm whether an existing mutant insect or worm line corresponds to a mutation in one or more SREBP pathway genes, by rescuing the mutant phenotype. Briefly, a genomic fragment containing the SREBP pathway gene of interest and potential flanking regulatory regions can be subcloned into any appropriate insect (such as Drosophila) or worm (such as C. elegans) transformation vector, and injected into the animals. For Drosophila, an appropriate helper plasmid is used in the injections to supply transposase for transposon-based vectors. Resulting germline transformants are crossed for complementation testing to an existing or newly created panel of Drosophila or C. elegans lines whose mutations have been mapped to the vicinity of the gene of interest (Greenspan, supra; and Caenorhabditis elegans: Modern Biological Analysis of an Organism (1995), Epstein and Shakes, eds.). If the genomic fragment rescues a mutant line, as judged by complementation of the mutant phenotype, then the mutant line likely harbors a mutation in the SREBP pathway gene. This prediction can be further confirmed by sequencing the SREBP pathway gene from the mutant line to identify the lesion in the SREBP pathway gene. Using above described methods of EMS mutagenesis, phenotypic analysis, and mutation detection, we identified a point mutation in the ceSREBP gene that weakly confers the loss-of-function pale intestine phenotype. Briefly, we mutagenized heterozygous nematodes that carried a partial deletion of ceSREBP, described in detail in Example 4, and, in trans, a recessive "dumpy (dp)" gene that conferred a short body. From the progeny, we screened for the rare individuals that displayed the pale intestine phenotype but not the dumpy phenotype, suggesting that the dp chromosome now also contained a mutation in the ceSREBP gene, which, in combination with the deletion allele, produced the intestinal defect. Sequence analysis of genomic DNA from the mutant line confirmed the existence of a point mutation that truncates the carboxy-terminal 36 amino acids of the ceSREBP protein. Identification of genes that modify SREBP pathway genes The characterization of new phenotypes created by mutations or misexpression in SREBP pathway genes enables one to test for genetic interactions between SREBP pathway genes and other genes that may participate in the same, related, or interacting genetic or biochemical pathway(s). Individual genes can be used as starting points in large-scale genetic modifier screens as described in more detail below. Alternatively, RNAi methods can be used to simulate loss-of-function mutations in the genes being analyzed. It is of particular interest to investigate whether there are any interactions of SREBP pathway genes with other well-characterized genes, particularly genes involved in lipid metabolism. For example, a candidate gene that may be tested for interaction with the SREBP pathway is the insulin receptor gene (referred to as inr in Drosophila, and daf-2 in C. elegans). Genetic modifier screens A genetic modifier screen using invertebrate model organisms is a particularly preferred method for identifying genes that interact with SREBP pathway genes, because large numbers of animals can be systematically screened making it more likely that interacting genes will be identified. In C. elegans and Drosophila, a screen of up to about 10,000 animals is considered to be a pilot-scale screen. Moderate-scale screens usually employ about 10,000 to about 50,000 flies or up to about 100,000 worms, and large-scale screens employ greater than about 50,000 or 100,000 flies or worms, respectively. In a genetic modifier screen, animals having a mutant phenotype due to a mutation in one or more SREBP pathway genes are further mutagenized, for example by chemical mutagenesis or transposon mutagenesis. The mutagenesis procedures used in typical genetic modifier screens of C. elegans are well known in the art. One method involves exposure of hermaphrodites that carry mutations in one or more SREBP pathway genes to a mutagen, such as EMS or trimethylpsoralen with ultraviolet radiation (Huang and Sternberg, Methods in Cell Biology (1995) 48:97- 122). Alternatively, transposable elements are used, oftentimes by the introduction of a mutator locus, such as mut-2, which promotes mobility of transposons (Anderson, Methods in Cell Biology (1995) 4:31-58). In Drosophila, the mutagenesis methods and other procedures used in a genetic modifier screen depend upon the precise nature of the mutant allele being modified; these methods are discussed in more detail below under the Drosophila genetic modifier screen subheading. Progeny of the mutagenized animals are generated and screened for the rare individuals that display suppressed or enhanced versions of the original mutant SREBP pathway phenotype. Such animals are presumed to have mutations in other genes, called "modifier" genes, that participate in the same pheno type-generating pathway. The newly identified modifier genes can be isolated away from the mutations in the SREBP pathway genes by genetic crosses, so that the intrinsic phenotypes caused by the modifier mutations can be assessed in isolation. We have performed enhancer and suppressor screens in C. elegans to identify genes that interact with the SREBP pathway. For both, the strategy was to mutagenize animals that had a pale intestine phenotype due to defective SREBP gene activity, and to screen for the rare individuals in which the phenotype was altered. For the enhancer screen, we mutagenized animals that were homozygous for the point mutation that truncated the SREBP protein, a weak allele, and screened for progeny that displayed more severe loss of function phenotypes, including intestinal defects, larval arrest, and small body size. In order to identify suppressors, we mutagenized wild-type animals that were reared on E. coli that expressed double-stranded RNA for part of the C. elegans SRΕBP gene. These nematodes developed into fertile adults that displayed pale intestines, reduced body size, and reduced fecundity. In the next generation, we screened for the rare individuals that displayed normal size and intestinal pigmentation. Several modifier genes have been identified. Modifier genes can be mapped using a combination of genetic and molecular methods known in the art. Modifiers that come from a genetic screen in C. elegans are preferably mapped with visible genetic markers and/or with molecular markers such as STS markers (Woods, supra; Epstein and Shakes, supra). Modifier genes may be uncovered by identification of a genomic clone that rescues the mutant phenotype, as described above. Alternatively, modifier genes that are identified by a Tel -based screen can be uncovered using transposon display technology (Korswagen et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (1996) 93(25): 14680-5). Standard techniques used for the mapping of modifiers that come from a genetic screen in Drosophila include meiotic mapping with visible or molecular genetic markers, male recombination relative to P-element insertions, complementation analysis with deficiencies, duplications, and lethal P-element insertions, and cytological analysis of chromosomal aberrations (Greenspan, supra; Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook, supra). Genes corresponding to modifier mutations that fail to complement a lethal P-element may be cloned by plasmid rescue of the genomic sequence sunounding that P-element. Alternatively, modifier genes may be mapped by phenotype rescue and positional cloning (Sambrook et al., supra). Newly identified modifier mutations can be tested directly for interaction with other genes of interest known to be involved or implicated in the SREBP using methods described above. Also, the new modifier mutations can be tested for interactions with genes in other pathways that are not believed to be related to lipid metabolism (e.g. Notch in Drosophila, and lin in C. elegans). New modifier mutations that exhibit specific genetic interactions with other genes implicated in lipid metabolism, but not interactions with genes in unrelated pathways, are of particular interest. The modifier mutations may also be used to identify "complementation groups". Two modifier mutations are considered to fall within the same complementation group if animals carrying both mutations in trans exhibit essentially the same phenotype as animals that are homozygous for each mutation individually and, generally, are lethal when in trans to each other. Generally, individual complementation groups defined in this way correspond to individual genes. When SREBP pathway modifier genes are identified, homologous genes in other species can be isolated using procedures based on cross-hybridization with modifier gene DNA probes, PCR-based strategies with primer sequences derived from the modifier genes, and/or computer searches of sequence databases. For therapeutic applications related to the function of SREBP pathway, human and rodent homologues of the modifier genes are of particular interest. For pesticide and other agricultural applications, homologues of modifier genes in insects and arachnids are of particular interest. Insects, acarids, arachnids, nematodes, and other organisms of interest include, among others, Isopoda; Diplopoda; Chilopoda; Symphyla; Thysanura; Collembola; Orthoptera, such as Scistocerca spp; Blattoidea, such as Blattella germanica; Dermaptera; Isoptera; Anoplura; Mallophaga; Thysanoptera; Heteroptera; Homoptera, including Bemisia tabaci, and Myzus spp.; Lepidoptera including Plodia interpunctella, Pectinophora gossypiella, Plutella spp., Heliothis spp., and Spodoptera species; Coleoptera such as Leptinotarsa, Diabrotica spp., Anthonomus spp., and Tribolium spp.; Hymenoptera, including Diptera, including Anopheles spp.; Siphonaptera, including Ctenocephalides felis; Arachnida; and Acarinan, including Amblyoma americanum; and nematodes, including Meloidogyne spp., and Heterodera glycinii. Genetic modifier screens in Drosophila The procedures involved in typical Drosophila genetic modifier screens are well known in the art (Wolfner and Goldberg, Methods in Cell Biology (1994) 44:33- 80; and Karim et al., Genetics (1996) 143:315-329). The procedures used differ depending upon the precise nature of the mutant allele being modified. If the mutant allele is genetically recessive, as is commonly the situation for a loss-of-function allele, then most typically males, or in some cases females, which carry one copy of the mutant allele are exposed to an effective mutagen, such as EMS, MMS, ENU, triethylamine, diepoxyalkanes, ICR-170, formaldehyde, X-rays, gamma rays, or ultraviolet radiation. The mutagenized animals are crossed to animals of the opposite sex that also carry the mutant allele to be modified. In the case where the mutant allele being modified is genetically dominant, as is commonly the situation for ectopically expressed genes, wild type males are mutagenized and crossed to females carrying the mutant allele to be modified. The progeny of the mutagenized and crossed flies that exhibit either enhancement or suppression of the original phenotype are immediately crossed to adults containing balancer chromosomes and used as founders of a stable genetic line. In addition, progeny of the founder adult are retested under the original screening conditions to ensure stability and reproducibility of the phenotype. Additional secondary screens may be employed, as appropriate, to confirm the suitability of each new modifier mutant line for further analysis. Although the above-described Drosophila genetic modifier screens are quite powerful and sensitive, some genes that participate in the SREBP pathway may be missed in this approach, particularly if there is functional redundancy of those genes. This is because the vast majority of the mutations generated in the standard mutagenesis methods will be loss-of-function mutations, whereas gain-of-function mutations that could reveal genes with functional redundancy will be relatively rare. Methods for systematic gain-of-function screens in Drosophila have been developed (Rorth et al, Development (1998) 125:1049-1057). This method is based on a modular mis-expression system utilizing components of the GAL4/UAS system (described above) where a modified P element, termed an "enhanced P" (EP) element, is genetically engineered to contain a GAL4-responsive UAS element and promoter. The resulting transposon is used to randomly tag genes by insertional mutagenesis (similar to the method of P element mutagenesis described above). Thousands of transgenic Drosophila strains, termed EP lines, can be generated, each containing a specific UAS-tagged gene. This approach takes advantage of the preference of P elements to insert at the 5'-ends of genes. Consequently, many of the genes that are tagged by insertion of EP elements become operably fused to a GAL4-regulated promoter, and increased expression or mis-expression of the randomly tagged gene can be induced by crossing in a GAL4 driver gene. Systematic gain-of-function genetic screens for modifiers of phenotypes induced by mutation or mis-expression of an SREBP pathway gene can be performed by crossing several thousand Drosophila EP lines into a genetic background containing a mutant or mis-expressed SREBP pathway gene, and further containing an appropriate GAL4 driver transgene. The progeny of this cross are then analyzed for enhancement or suppression of the original mutant phenotype as described above. Those identified as having mutations that interact with the SREBP pathway can be crossed further to verify the reproducibility and specificity of this genetic interaction. EP insertions that demonstrate a specific genetic interaction with a mutant or mis- expressed SREBP pathway gene, have a physically tagged a new gene which can be identified and sequenced using PCR or hybridization screening methods, allowing the isolation of the genomic DNA adjacent to the position of the EP element insertion. BODIPY-fatty acid conjugates for determining lipid content of nematodes Because defects in the SREBP pathway can result in abnormal metabolism of lipids, a method for readily identifying mutant model organisms that exhibit abnormalities in lipid metabolism would be beneficial. Existing methods for assessing lipid content in nematodes include the use of non- vital stains such as Sudan Black (Kimura et al, Science (1997) 277:942-6). However, the drawbacks of these techniques are that the nematodes must be fixed prior to staining. Fixation can introduce artifacts, making an accurate assessment difficult, and furthermore, kills the animals making it impossible to carry out further genetic analysis on the fixed animals. In order to avoid these problems associated with fixing nematodes, certain vital stains were tried that are routinely used for staining lipid in cultured cells such as Nile Red (Greenspan et al, J Cell Biol, (1985) 100:965- 973). However, it was found that these dyes tended to result in background fluorescence of gut granules which are auto-fluorescent organelles of the intestinal epithelial cells that are thought be to lysosomes. In many cases, these fluorescent vital stains appeared to be concentrated in gut granules, enhancing their fluorescence and causing difficulty in accurately measuring the fluorescence due to lipid droplet staining in the intestine. Accordingly, the invention provides an improved method for measuring lipid storage in live nematodes. It has been found that BODIPY® dyes conjugated to fatty acids (e.g. BODIPY® FL C12 (4,4-difluoro-5,7-dimethyl- 4-bora- 3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene- 3-dodecanoic acid), and CI -BODIPY® 500/510 C12 (4,4- difluoro-5-methyl-4-bora- 3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene- 3-dodecanoic acid) Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) concentrate in lipid droplets in the intestines of living nematodes. These dyes do not have the drawbacks associated with other vital dyes because, in addition to clearly staining and fluorescing in lipid droplets in the intestine, they quench the background fluorescence due to the gut granules. Thus, the invention provides a method of using BODIPY®-fatty acid conjugates to stain live nematodes for determining the relative and absolute lipid content in response to changes in metabolic conditions brought on by a) changes in genetic backgrounds including mutations in genes essential for control of metabolic processes, b) changes in environmental conditions such as food sources, temperature, and crowding conditions, and c) different developmental states including the dauer larva. This method is particularly valuable in uses that involve genetic screens and compound screens based on changes in metabolic processes such as the SREBP processing pathway, among others. The method allows considerable increases in accuracy of lipid quantification in vivo over the use of other fluorescent lipophilic stains, making automated sorting of the nematodes based on fluorescence feasible. BODIPY® conjugates have previously been used to study (1) lipid content in the surface membrane of Shistosoma mansoni worms (Redman and Kusel, Parasitology (1996) 113(2):137- 143), (2) lipid endocytosis in cultured mammalian fibroblasts (Pagano and Chen, Ann N Y Acad Sci (1998) 845:152-160), (3) lipid trafficking between the Golgi apparatus and plasma membrane of cultured mammalian fibroblasts (Pagano et al, J. Cell. Biol (1991) 113(6):1267-1279), (4) fatty acid transport by Saccharomyces (Faergeman et al., J. Biol. Chem (1997) 272(13):8531-8538) and (5) distribution of ivermectin in muscle vesicle membranes of Ascaris suum (Marin and Kusel, Parasitology (1992) 104(3):549-555). However, these prior uses of BODIPY® conjugates do not suggest the applicability of BODIPY® conjugates, and in particular, BODIPY® fatty acid conjugates, for quantification of lipid storage in nematodes. Moreover, the fact that BODIPY® fatty acid conjugates quenches background fluorescence from lysosomes, providing for more accurate quantification, is an unexpected and important advantage provided by the invention that permits large-scale, automated sorting of animals based on fluorescence. BODIPY®-fatty acid conjugates can be used to stain nematodes of different genetic backgrounds for use in genetic screens, both de novo screens for mutations affecting lipid content of whole nematodes and modifier screens for mutations that change lipid accumulation in mutant nematodes (for example, the insulin receptor (daf-2) or the SREBP homolog (ceSREBP) nematodes). The intestines of the nematodes can be visually examined for lipid content under a fluorescent microscope and mutant animals can be subsequently propagated for cloning purposes. This method can be used in conjunction with automatic flow sorter technology to rapidly separate large numbers of living nematodes by lipid content. This would be useful either for automated high throughput genetic screening or for large scale automated separation of dauer larvae from other developmental stages. Additionally, the method can be used to determine changes in lipid accumulation in nematodes exposed to inhibitory compounds that might serve as therapeutic agents for the control of diabetes, obesity, lipid storage diseases, or other human or animal diseases. A test compound can be administered to a nematode by direct contact, ingestion, injection, or any suitable method and changes in lipid content of the nematode or its progeny are observed. Further, the method is applicable to reverse genetic screening using inhibitory RNA. For example, nematodes could be exposed to combinations of large numbers of RNAs in 384-well plates and screened for changes in lipid content mediated by RNAi using fluorometry or direct visual observation. EXAMPLES The following examples show how the nucleic acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs 1, 3, and 5, and 7 were isolated, and how these sequences, and derivatives and fragments thereof, as well as other SREBP pathway nucleic acids and gene products can be used for genetic studies to elucidate mechanisms of the SREBP pathway as well as the discovery of potential pharmaceutical or pesticidal agents that interact with the pathway. As used herein, all C. elegans-deήved gene sequences are designated by the letters "ce" in front of the gene sequence. Likewise, all Drosophila-deήved gene sequences are designated by the letter "d" in front of the gene sequence. EXAMPLE 1: CLONING OF C. ELEGANS SREBP The C. elegans genomic database was searched with the protein sequence of the human SREBP- 1, SREBP-2, and Drosophila SREBP homologue, HLH106, using the TBLASTN search tool (Altschul et al., supra). One C. elegans open reading frame showed significant homology with all three of the above SREBP proteins. This homology extends throughout much of the SREBP protein sequences, excluding the C-terminal part of the gene. The C. elegans open reading frame was located on two overlapping clones on the right arm of chromosome III (Y47D3 and H10N23). At the time of the search, there were no previous annotations, gene predictions, nor candidate mutants that mapped to this region that would suggest previous identification of this open reading frame as an SREBP-related gene. Using BLAST analyses (Altschul et al, supra) and the GENSCAN Genefinder program (Burge and Karlin, J. Mol. Biol. (1997) 268(l):78-94) , a predicted exon intron structure for the C. elegans SREBP-related gene (ceSREBP) was generated. This C. elegans homologue of SREBP cDNA was cloned in order to validate its existence as an expressed mRNA, and to determine the cDNA and protein sequence for the elucidation of ceSREBP function. Moreover, cloning of ceSREBP was a prerequisite for future genetic manipulations that require knowledge of the sequence, such as RNAi experiments, generation of misexpression constructs, isolation of Tel insertion or chemical deletion mutants, etc. The ceSREBP was cloned by PCR from a mixed-stage, 1 st strand cDNA pool that was synthesized from poly-A+ RNA using the Notl primer/adapter (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MI). The N-terminal and C-terminal ends of ceSREBP were cloned using gene-specific internal primers and non-specific primers at 3' and 5' ends. The 5' and 3' non-specific primers were, respectively the Splice Leader 1 ("SL1") sequence (Shakes and Epstein, supra) and a modified Notl primer/adaptor (Life Technologies). Internal primers were made to regions of high homology according to the GENSCAN prediction for ceSREBP, that were also predicted by the ACEDB Genefinder (Richard Durbin and Jean Thierry Mi eg (1991 -present), A C. elegans Database; documentation, code and data available from anonymous FTP servers at lirmm.lirmm.fr, cele.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk and ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) . They were designed to amplify the ends of the cDNA, not the full-length cDNA. Once the end sequence was known, the full-length cDNA was amplified in overlapping N-terminal and C-terminal parts using gene-specific primer pairs. Amplifications were performed using Expand™ High Fidelity buffers and enzyme mixes essentially according to manufacturer's recommendations (Roche, Summerville, NJ). PCR amplicons were subcloned into the PCR2.1 intermediate vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and sequenced using the Big Dye™ dye-terminator sequencing kit and the ABI377 sequencer (ABI, Foster City, CA). Sequence analysis was done with the Sequencher program (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI). Sequencing primers were designed using the Oligo 4.0 program (Molecular Biology Insights, Inc.; Cascade, CO) and were selected from the predicted gene sequence and, subsequently, from sequence of newly obtained fragments. Sequence information obtained from the initial amplified fragments allowed subsequent amplification overlapping fragments that represented the entire cDNA. Any sequence discrepancies, either with the available genomic sequence or among different subclones of the same sequence, were resolved by sequencing multiple, independently isolated subclones of the given fragment. A single contiguous sequence ("contig") was assembled that shared sequence identity with the YAC sequence Y47D3 (GI3646936) from which gene predictions were made. It was mostly identical to the gene prediction in this region but contained one exon not included in the gene prediction. The contig contained a single open reading frame (ORF), initiation and termination codons, and a likely poly-adenylation signal. BLAST analysis of this contig against GenBank sequences, showed highest homology to other SREBPs. The cDNA sequence of the ceSREBP gene, SEQ ED NO:l is shown in Figure 2. The cDNA is 3419 nucleotides long. This full-length clone contained a single open reading frame with an apparent translational initiation site at nucleotide position 24 and a stop signal at nucleotide position 3365. The predicted polypeptide precursor is 1113 amino acids. Additional features include an acidic domain at about nucleotides 24 to 233 (amino acid residues 1 to 69); a possible second acidic domain at about nucleotides 987 to 1040 (amino acid residues 321 to 338); a basic Helix-loop- helix domain at about nucleotides 1089 to 1286 (amino acid residues 355 to 421); a first transmembrane domain at about nucleotides 1455 to 1514 (amino acid residues 477 to 497); and a second transmembrane domain at about nucleotides 1653 to 1706 (amino acid residues 543 to 561). A BLAST analysis against the Y47D3 clone which has a total of 351,956 nucleotides, revealed 12 regions of Y47D3 which share sequence identity with SEQ ED NO: 1 , as shown in Table I. TABLE I An alignment of the predicted protein sequence (SEQ ID NO:2) against the human and Drosophila SREBP proteins was performed. Amino acid residues 353 to 423 of SEQ LD NO:2 share 45% and sequence identity and 77% sequence similarity with amino acid residues 281-351 of Drosophila SREBP (Theopold et al, supra; GI079656). Amino acid residues 466 to 826 of SEQ ID NO:2 share 28% sequence identity and 47% sequence similarity with human SREBP2 (Gil 082805). The presence of other gene and protein sequences bearing significant homology to the full-length ceSREBP was further investigated using the BLAST family of computer programs against public databases. The following amino acid sequences were the most similar: SREBP- 1, Chinese Hamster (GI 1083186); SREBP- 1, Cricetulus griseus (GI 516003); Sequence 54 from patent US 5527690 (GI 1610915); SREBP2 precursor, human (GI 1082805); SREBP-2, Homo sapiens (GI 451330); SREBP2 precursor, Chinese hamster (GI 1083185); Sequence 38 from patent US 5527690 (GI 1610908); SREBP-1, Homo sapiens (GI 409405); SREBP-2, Cricetulus griseus (GI 551506); Transcription factor ADD1, Rat (GI 540006); and HLH106, Drosophila Melanogaster (GI 107965). Subsequent to the above analysis, a Genefinder prediction of the ceSREBP protein was entered into the Genbank database, which is 100% identical to SEQ ID NO:2, and is designated GI 3881008. EXAMPLE 2: ceSREBP EXPRESSION ANALYSIS Expression of ceSREBP was assayed using a transcriptional reporter system in which the putative promoter/enhancer region of ceSREBP was fused to GFP. To determine how much genomic sequence to include in the reporter construct, the Y47D3 contig containing the N-terminal region of the ceSREBP cDNA and -25 kb upstream of the ceSREBP initiation codon, was analyzed using ACEDB Genefinder and GENSCAN programs (Burge and Karlin, supra). There were no known genes within this region, and no predicted genes reported by either program. Of the two predicted genes within -8 kilobases (kb) of ceSREBP, one, -5 kb upstream of ceSREBP showed limited homologies by BLAST analysis to C. elegans expressed sequence tags (ESTs). A genomic fragment of -4.5 kb was chosen as the putative promoter/enhancer region. The promoter enhancer fragment was amplified by PCR. PCR primers were designed to amplify the -4.5 kb genomic fragment, including the first few amino acids of ceSREBP. Restriction sites were included in the primers to facilitate sub-cloning into the GFP reporter vector pPDl 17.01 (from the laboratory of Dr. Andrew Z. Fire (Fire Lab)), Carnegie Institution of Washington, Baltimore, MD) in an in- frame translational fusion to GFP. The sense primer, nucleotides 71,242-71,265 of Y47D3 (GL3646936), contained an Ascl site; the antisense primer, nucleotides 66,719-66,747 of Y47D3, contained a Kpnl/Asp718 site: PCR was performed in duplicate to provide two independently amplified promoter fragments for independent confirmation of the expression pattern and thus control for sequence errors introduced by PCR. The Klentaq enzyme and buffer systems were used essentially according to manufacturer's protocols. From each original PCR reaction, a single clone that contained the expected insert was identified. The putative promoter/enhancer fragments were ligated into Ascl and Asp718 restriction sites in pPDl 17.01 to create "ceSREBP:: GFP." ceSREBP: :GFP was injected into N2 worms using standard protocols for C. elegans transformation (Epstein and Shakes, supra) at a concentration of 10 μg/ml plus 100 μg/ml pRF4 rol-6(d) transformation marker, and stable lines displaying the roller phenotype were established. Expression analysis was done with a fluorescence microscope (Axioplan™, Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). By GFP expression analysis, ceSREBP is first expressed weakly in embryonic gut cells at the time of gut cell polarization, which marks the beginning of differentiation. There is strong fluorescence by the "bean stage" which persists in all intestinal cells throughout embryogenesis and at all larval and adult stages. There is also weak fluorescence in the pharynx. Because there is high specificity of expression of ceSREBP in intestinal cells, the ceSREBP promoter, contained within nucleotides 66,719-71,265 of Y47D3 (GL3646936), has utility as a tissue specific promoter that can be operably linked to heterologous sequences, such as marker genes and/or genes of interest. Thus, the ceSREBP promoter can be used for studying biochemical pathways within the intestine of C. elegans. EXAMPLE 3: RNA INTERFERENCE (RNAI) OF C. ELEGANS SREBP, S2P and SCAP RNAi experiments were performed with C. elegans SREBP pathway genes in order to generate loss-of-function phenotypes that could help elucidate the function of the SREBP pathway in C. elegans. Methods: PCR was carried out on C. elegans sequences for SREBP (SEQ ID NO:l) and S2P (Rawson et al., supra; Gil 559384), and a Genbank sequence (GI3875380), that is annotated as having HMG-CoA reductase homology, and additionally has been determined to have homology to the human SCAP protein. Accordingly, GI3875380 is refeπed to herein as ceSCAP. Fragments of between 0.3kb to 1.2kb were produced in regions of interest. In general, mixtures of fragments that individually corresponded to different regions of the genes and together covered most of the central region of each gene were injected. For ceSREBP, these fragments spanned a mid-region of -1.4 kb, excluding the amino-terminal ~ 0.6 kb and the carboxy- terminal -1.4 kb. Similarly, ceS2P dsRNA fragments excluded the amino terminal -0.7 kb and carboxy-terminal -0.3 kb and covered the central region. ceSCAP fragments covered most of the coding sequence, excluding the amino-terminal -0.4 kb and the carboxy-terminal -lkb. PCR was carried out with 0.5 μM each primer and 0.4 μg genomic DNA using the Expand™ PCR Kit (Roche) at 94°C 1 min 15 sec; and 35 cycles of: 94°C 15 sec, 57°C 45 sec, and 72°C 1 min. A small fraction of each reaction was run on a gel to assure that the PCR worked. The rest of each reaction was precipitated and then re-suspended in RNase- free water, to serve as the template for production of sense and antisense RNAs. Sense and antisense RNA were transcribed together from the DNA template using T7 RNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI; RNA production kit, Cat#1300) following the manufacturer's protocol. The resulting RNA samples were ethanol-precipitated and resuspended in 20 μl of RNAse- free TE (lOmM tris, ImM EDTA), followed by 10 μl of RNase free 3X LM annealing buffer (20mM KPO4 pH7.5, 3mM KCitrate pH 7.5, 2% PEG 6000). The reactions were incubated at 68°C for 10 minutes and then at 37°C for 30 minutes to anneal the sense and antisense strands. Injection volumes were selected to deliver 0.5xl0 6 to lxlO 6 molecules of RNA. Injections were delivered to the gonads or the intestinal cavity of C. elegans, and were carried out using the methods of Fire et al. (Development (1991) 113:503- 514). For germline RNAi, adult animals were microinjected with RNA into either the gonad or intestine using a glass needle mounted on a Medical Systems Corp. (Holliston, MA) PLI-90 injector. For RNAi of larvae, wild type LI larvae were isolated by first collecting embryos from gravid adults by digestion in 1.25% sodium hypochlorite, 0.25M potassium hydroxide, and then allowing the embryos to hatch overnight in M9 buffer. Equal volumes of larvae in M9 buffer and RNA were mixed in wells of microtiter plates, incubated for 24 hours at 15°C, and then transferred to standard nematode growth plates. For visualization of lipid, some of the worms were washed off a plate using M9 buffer (per liter: 30gr Na 2 HPO 4 , 15g KH 2 PO 4 , 2.5g NaCl, 5g NH 4 C1), collected by centrifugation, and resuspended in a 2ng/ml solution of BODIPY™. FL.C12; stock solution is lmg/ml in ethanol) prepared in M9 buffer. The worms were placed on a benchtop shaker overnight at room temperature to absorb the dye. Images were captured using a fluorescence microscope (Axioplan™, Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) the next day. Results: ceSREBP RNAi Germline ceSREBP RNAi produced several visible phenotypes in the progeny of the microinjected animals. The gross phenotype was a fully penetrant larval arrest. Arrested larvae appeared to be at the L2 stage based on gonad and cuticle morphology, although their length was more similar to that of LI stage larvae. Arrested larvae remained motile and feeding for several days at 20°C before dying. Their intestine appeared paler, or less darkly pigmented, than wild type, and this is referred to as the "pale intestine" or "Pin" phenotype. Morpho logical defects in ceSREBP RNAi larvae (LI and L2 stages) were confined to the intestine, where ceSREBP appeared to be primarily expressed, and specifically affected three cytoplasmic structures in intestinal cells. First, there was a dramatic reduction in the number and average size of pigmented droplets in the intestine. This reduction of pigmented droplets seemed to account for the Pin phenotype observed at low magnification. These droplets likely contain lipid since they stained with dye-labeled fatty acid (BODEPY™-dodecanoic acid) and their number in various developmental stages and mutants correlated with the level of staining with the dye Sudan black in fixed animals. These observations indicated that ceSREBP is required for formation and/or maintenance of lipid droplets in the intestine, the main lipid storage organ of C. elegans. Second, the gut granules appeared larger and more birefringent than in wild type. Third, many variably sized vesicles appeared in the intestine. These vesicles were spherical and transparent; similar vesicles are only rarely observed in wild type larvae. The vesicles in ceSREBP RNAi larvae were usually each associated with a gut granule, and they showed autofluorescence similar in color and intensity to that of gut granules. Since gut granules are thought to be lysosomal structures, the abnormal vesicles in ceSREBP RNAi larvae may also have been lysosomal in origin. The larval arrest and morphological defects in the intestine described above were also observed in mutant larvae homozygous for the ceSREBP partial deletion allele "ep79 (see Example 4), " suggesting that germline RNAi reproduced the zygotic null phenotype. ceSREBP RNAi of larvae at the LI stage resulted in apparently normal development through the L2 stage, with approximately normal accumulation of intestinal pigmented droplets. However, most larvae arrested at the L3 or L4 stage and failed to maintain their droplets. Arrested larvae, as well as many fully developed adults, showed the Pin phenotype and had a thinner body than normal. The number and size of pigmented intestinal droplets was greatly reduced, as observed in earlier stages for germline RNAi. The finding that the Pin phenoptype could be induced by RNAi treatment after terminal differentiation of the intestine indicates that the phenotype is unlikely to be caused by a developmental defect in the intestinal cells. Rather, ceSREBP maybe required continuously for proper functioning of the intestine. The pale, thin appearance of ceSREBP RNAi larvae and adults was similar to that of starved animals; however, the RNAi animals display foraging behavior and pump in bacteria through the pharynx into the intestine. These observations suggested that ceSREBP RNAi larvae were defective in digesting and/or metabolizing food. ceSREBP RNAi larvae showed greater dispersal away from the food source than wild type, possibly because they could not derive nutrients from the bacteria. Gut granules of the arrested larvae and adults were often larger and more birefringent that normal. Adults that displayed the Pin phenotype had fewer embryos than normal in their uterus, suggesting reduced fecundity, and some of the embryos showed variable developmental defects. Finally, Pin adults often contained large, transparent vacuoles in the anterior half of the intestine. These vacuoles were distinct from the abnormal vesicles observed in larvae, since the vacuoles were irregularly shaped and not auto fluorescent, although their origin remains unidentified. ceSREBP RNAi of larvae at the L2 stage resulted in the same defects as LI treatment, but mainly in later stages of development. Most animals arrested at the L4 stage or displayed the adult defects. We also performed a RNAi feeding experiment. A DNA vector in which a portion of the ceSREBP cDNA was inserted between two T7 promoters was constructed and introduced into E. coli that express the T7 polymerase. The fragment contained most of the coding sequence except the amino-terminal -600 nucleotides. The bacteria generated both sense and antisense transcripts, and thus produced dsRNA of ceSREBP. When fed to wild type nematodes, these E. coli produced the same phenotypes obtained from RNAi treatment of L2 larvae, namely, pale intestine, reduced body size, and reduced fecundity. ceS2P RNAi Germline RNAi of the ceS2P resulted in apparently normal development through the adult stage. However, adults showed a fully penetrant phenotype, exhibiting all the defects observed for ceSREBP larval RNAi except larval arrest. Specifically, the adult phenotype included a small, thin body, pale intestine associated with few lipid droplets, abnormally large and birefringent gut granules, large vacuoles in the anterior intestine, fewer embryos in the uterus, and variable developmental defects in some of the embryos. The gut granule defects seemed more pronounced than observed for ceSREBP RNAi. The striking similarity of the RNAi phenotypes for ceS2P and ceSREBP strongly suggested that these two genes function in a common genetic pathway. The lack of effect of ceS2P RNAi on larval development may indicate functional redundancy with an unidentified gene or reduced potency of RNAi for ceS2P compared to ceSREBP. ceSCAP RNAi Germline RNAi of the SCAP homologue generated a phenotype similar to ceS2P RNAi in less than 10% of adults. Defective adults displayed a pale intestine, small and thin body, few embryos in the uterus, and slightly more birefringent gut granules. Germline RNAi of both ceS2P and ceSCAP together produced a fully penetrant phenotype indistinguishable from ceSREBP germline RNAi. This phenotype included L2-L3 larval arrest, pale intestine associated with few or no intestinal lipid droplets, and abnormally large and birefringent gut granules. These results suggested that both the ceS2P and ceSCAP homologues function in the ceSREBP genetic pathway at all larval and adult stages. If RNAi of ceS2P or ceSCAP produced the null phenotype for these genes, then there must exist other gene activities that can partially substitute for their functions, presumably in proteolytic cleavage at site 2 and 1 analogues, respectively, of ceSREBP. EXAMPLE 4: TCI TRANSPOSON MUTAGENESIS The goal of this set of experiments was to produce loss-of-function mutations in genes of interest in order to understand the function of their wild-type counterparts. Library preparation A Tel transposon insertion library comprising 3 sets of 960 cultures was constructed according to published protocols (Zwaal et al, supra, and Plasterk, supra). Library screening The library was screened in individual tiers, each library having three tiers, with each tier composed of 1,000 lysates or -200,000 haploid genomes. Lysates were pooled according to the published protocol. A first dimension screen involved PCR on 8 samples of pooled DNA from ten 96-well plates. A second dimension screen was used to determine which of the ten 96-well plates contained the desired mutant (involved screening of 10 DNA pools). A third dimension screen was used to determine the "address" of a particular mutant (i.e., in which column and row a particular mutant resided - via screening of 12 individual lysates from a single row). First dimension reactions were done in quadruplicate; second and third were done in triplicate. Two rounds of PCR were performed, each with one gene-specific primer and and oneTcl -specific primer. The second PCR reaction was designed to be a nested reaction. Accordingly, two nested pairs of Tel primers were used: one pair pointing outward from the left of the transposon, and the other pair pointing outward from the right (these primer pairs are described in the references cited above). The gene- specific primers are all contained within SEQ ED NO:l or intervening intron sequence contained within Y47D3 (see Table I in Example I). The first and second round PCR for each dimension was performed in 15 μl total volume using the following in each reaction: IX PCR buffer provided by the manufacturer (Perkin-Elmer), 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μM each of the Tcl and the gene-specific primer, 0.5 units of Taq Polymerase (Perkin-Elmer); and H 2 O to 13 μl for the first round reactions, and to 15 μl for the second round First and Second dimension: 2 μl of 1 :20 diluted DNA was added; 1:10 DNA diluted was added to the third dimension reactions. A small amount of first round reaction was transferred to the second round using a pin replicator. PCR cycling conditions were: 94°C for 3 minutes; then 94 °C for 40 seconds, 58°C for 1 minute, 72°C for 2 minutes for 35 cycles; then 72°C for 2 minutes. Identification of insertion animals: Four confirmed Tcl insertions were found in the ceSREBP gene, in introns 2, 5, 7, and 8, which follow exons 2, 5, 7 and 8, respectively, in the genomic sequence in Table I in Example I. All addresses are from Tier 1 of the Tcl library described above. The "6D2" address, located downstream of the two predicted transmembrane domain coding regions was chosen for further analysis based on its relatively central location within the SREBP gene. Nematodes were recovered from a frozen stock representing the 6D2 address. In order to identify a nematode carrying the insertion, individual surviving nematodes were transferred to individual plates. After progeny from these nematodes were present on the plates, the parent nematodes were transferred into individual wells of a 96-well plate that contained 5μl of nematode lysis buffer (100 mM KC1, 20 mM Tris- HCl pH 8.3, 5 mM MgC12, 0.9% Nonidet P-40, 0.9% Tween-20, 0.02% gelatin, and 400 μg/ml proteinase K). The nematodes were lysed in a PCR machine at 60°C for one hour, followed by 95°C for 15 minutes. 18 μl of a PCR master mix then was added to the crude lysates (to give -20 μl total reaction volume, assuming evaporation of a portion of the lysate); this mix contained IX reaction buffer (Perkin-Elmer), 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.2 mM each dNTP, 0.5 μM each gene-specific primer, 0.5 units Taq polymerase, and dH 2 O to 18 μl per reaction The PCR reactions were cycled using a program identical to that used for screening the library for the insertions described above. Subsequently, a second round of PCR was performed using the same conditions and primers described above for the insertion screen, after transferring a small amount of the first round reaction to the second round master mix using a pin replicator. Reactions were analyzed on agarose gels for insertion products identical in size to those observed in the original screen for insertions. Using this PCR-based screen, a population of nematodes was obtained that was homozygous for the insertion. However, since this Tcl insertion was in an intron, and since Tcl elements are often completely removed along with the intron during splicing of the pre-mRNA, the insertion was unlikely to affect gene function. Consequently, this insertion population was used to identify a deletion in the ceSREBP gene by imprecise excision of the Tcl element (as described above). Identification of a Tcl-mediated deletion In order to obtain a Tcl-mediated deletion in the ceSREBP gene, a small library consisting of 244 cultures of 6D2 insertion nematodes was generated. To create the library, -5-10 nematodes homozygous for the 6D2 insertion were seeded onto individual plates. After these nematodes had grown, reproduced, and consumed all of the bacteria on these plates, triplicate lysates representing these cultures were created. A sample of nematodes from each plate was collected by washing the plate with distilled water, and placing the nematodes washed from each plate in one well of a 96-well plate. This was repeated two additional times to create a triplicate set of lysates. Nematodes were lysed by addition of an equal volume of lysis buffer followed by incubation at -80°C for 15 minutes, 60°C for 3 hours, and 95°C for 15-30 minutes. Deletion screening was carried out using a PCR-based approach similar to that used for insertion screening, both of which have been described previously (Zwaal et al., supra; and Plasterk, supra). Two sets of gene-specific primer pairs were chosen for carrying out a nested PCR strategy such that an outside set was used for the first round of PCR and an inside set was used for the second round of PCR. The second round of PCR was performed to achieve greater specificity in the reaction. The primer sets chosen were -3.2 kb apart in the ceSREBP genomic sequence (within the typical range for Tcl deletion screening) flank either side of the Tcl insertion in the 6D2 population. The first round PCR reactions were performed using 2 μl of lysate from two of the three sets of lysates, with reactions carried out in a 96-well plate. PCR was done as described above for identification of insertions. The reactions were carried out in duplicate using the following cycling parameters: 94°C for 3 minutes, then 35 cycles of the following: 94°C for 40 seconds, 55°C for 1 minute, and 72°C for 1 minute. The second round of PCR was essentially the same. A small amount of first-round reaction products was transferred to the second-round reaction mixtures using a 96-pin replicator. Products of the second round of PCR were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels. A potential deletion product was observed in both of the reactions, and the putative positive lysate was re-tested by performing duplicate reactions using the relevant lysate from all 3 sets of the library (for a total of six reactions) in two rounds of PCR as described above. The product was gel purified and sequenced directly to confirm the presence of the desired deletion. In addition, in order to confirm that the deletion product obtained was specific for the SREBP region (i.e. not an artifact of the PCR), an additional primer set was used in two rounds of PCR. A separate set of reactions was performed using all three lysates and one of the two original primer pairs. This primer set was chosen such that the PCR product generated would be -100-300 base-pairs different in size from the original deletion product, resulting in a noticeable shift in size from the original product when analyzed on l%o agarose gels. This part of the screening procedure is termed the "specificity test". Using this procedure to screen the 244 lysates from the 6D2 insertion library with the primers listed above, one deletion of -2.2 kb within the ceSREBP genomic region was identified, and confirmed by the specificity test and by sequence analysis. This deletion begins within intron 6, and ends within exon 9 of the ceSREBP gene. This partial deletion allele was named ceSREBP (ep79). Identification of deletion animals Following the identification the deletion, 192 individual nematodes from the relevant plate were transferred onto separate plates. When progeny were present on the plate, the parent nematodes were placed into buffer in 96-well plates and lysed as described above. PCR was performed using the primers that identified the deletion. One animal that carried the deletion was identified. Analysis of mutant phenotypes Prior to analysis of the SREBP deletion animals, animals carrying the SREBP deletion were out-crossed ten times to a wild-type (N2/Bristol) strain in order to remove unrelated mutations induced by Tcl elements in the original mutator strain from which the insertion and deletion animals were isolated. Throughout the out- crossing procedure, the ceSREBP deletion was followed and maintained by analyzing progeny of these crosses by PCR, using the same primers and conditions used for the deletion screen above. The deletion mutation was placed in trans to a balancer chromosome and maintained as a heterozygous strain. Reduction or elimination of function mutations often recapitulate phenotypes observed by RNAi, and ceSREBP RNAi resulted in larval arrest. Accordingly, homozygous deletion mutants would not be able to propagate themselves if the mutation produced a larval arrest phenotype. The out-crossed and balanced strain was analyzed for any mutant phenotypes due to the SREBP deletion. Approximately 25% of the progeny derived from heterozygous SREBP deletion animals (which would correlate to presumptive deletion homozygotes) displayed the same phenotypes produced by ceSREBP RNAi, described in Example 3 above. These phenotypes included early larval arrest, reduced pigmentation as a result of fewer lipid droplets in the intestine, and accumulation of fluid-filled vesicles. EXAMPLE 5: CLONING OF DROSOPHILA S2P Using BLAST, two EST clones from the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (BDGP), LD11632 (GI2044683) and LD 14421 (GI2151648) were found to have homology with hamster S2P (GI2745731). The sequences were contained in two PI clones D379 and D380 (GI3893020). Primer walking based on these sequences was used to obtain the full-length DNA sequence. Several more sequencing reactions were performed to produce a complete and unambiguous coverage of the gene, which is referred to herein as Drosophila S2P (dS2P). A full length clone (SEQ ED NO:3) was identified that contained a single open reading frame with an apparent translation start site at nucleotide position 219, and a stop signal at nucleotide position 1745. The predicted polypeptide precursor is 508 amino acids long (SEQ ED NO:4). A search of the PFam and PROSITE databases (Sonnhammer et al., Genomics (1997) 46:200-216; Bairoch et al. NAR (1991) 19 Suppl:2241-2245; and Hofmann et al., NAR (1999) 27:215-219) revealed seven transmembrane domains and a PDZ domain. The transmembrane domains are located at approximately amino acid residues 4 to 20 (TM1), 82-98 (TM2), 143-159 (TM3), 163-179 (TM4), 208-224 (TM5), 428-444 (TM6) and 478-494 (TM7). The putative PDZ domain is located at approximately amino acid residues 215-285. The presence of other gene and protein sequences bearing significant homology to Drosophila S2P (Fig.2, SEQ ID NO.4) was investigated using the BLAST family of computer programs (Altschul et al., supra). The following amino acid sequences were the most similar: S2P Homo sapiens (GI2745733); S2P Cricetulus griseus (GI2745731); SP2 metalloprotease, Homo sapiens (GI4164134 and GI4164135); putative protein Arabidopsis thaliana (GI2982448); conserved protein Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum (GI2622476); and Orf c04034 Sulfolobus solfataricus (Gil 707806). The most homologous sequence was human S2P (GI2745733) which shared 9 contiguous amino acids at positions 201-207 of SEQ ID NO:4. Amino acids 127 to 501 of SEQ ID NO:4 shares 32 % sequence identity with amino acids 148 to 515 of GI2745733. EXAMPLE 6: CLONING OF DROSOPHILA SCAP The Drosophila SCAP homologue (dSCAP) identified herein, was cloned by PCR based on sequence from a gene prediction and from 5' RACE. BLAST analysis of the hamster SCAP (GI1675220) revealed a genomic PI clone, DS06954, with regions of high homology. GENSCAN gene finder analysis of this PI predicted a cDNA that included these homologous regions and was partially covered by ESTs. dSCAP was cloned in overlapping N-terminal and C-terminal fragments. N-terminal sequence not represented within the gene prediction was obtained by RACE from embryo cDNA prepared with Marathon system (Clontech). A short N-terminal fragment was amplified using non-specific primer API to the Marathon adaptor and an antisense primer contained within the 5' EST. Amplification was performed with Klentaq™ enzyme and buffers, essentially according to manufacturer's recommendations. The major -0.7 kb PCR product was cloned into the pCRII shuttle vector (Invitrogen) and completely sequenced using Ml 3 forward and reverse primers, and the start codon was identified. Based on the N-terminal sequence identified, a longer N-terminal and an overlapping C-terminal fragment were amplified. A full-length contig was identified that contained a single open reading frame with an apparent translational initiation site at nucleotide position 73 and a stop signal at nucleotide position 3786 (SEQ ED NO:5). The predicted polypeptide precursor is 1237 amino acids long (SEQ ED NO:6). Additional features include: 1) Four G-beta (GB) repeat WD domains: GB1 at nucleotides 2509 to 2617, corresponding to amino acid residues 812 to 848; GB2 at nucleotides 3080 to 3196, corresponding to amino acid residues 1005 to 1041 ; GB3 at nucleotides 3208 to 3325, corresponding to amino acid residues 1045 to 1084; and GB4 at nucleotides 3337 to 3445, corresponding to amino acid residues 1088 to 1124; 2) Six predicted transmembrane (TM) domains. TM1 at nucleotides 991 to 1039, corresponding to amino acid residues 306 to 322; TM2 at nucleotides 1117 to 1165, corresponding to amino acid residues 348 to 364; TM3 at nucleotides 1180 to 1228, corresponding to amino acid residues 369-385; TM4 at nucleotides 1366 to 1414, corresponding to amino acid residues 431-447; TM5 at nucleotides 1753 to 1801, corresponding to amino acid residues 560 to 576; and TM6 at nucleotides 2353 to 2401, corresponding to amino acid residues 760 to 776. The presence of other gene and protein sequences bearing significant homology to dSCAP (SEQ ED NO:5) was investigated using BLAST (Altschul et al., supra) against nucleotide databases. This revealed that dSCAP is covered by two genomic clones from BDGP: DS06954 (PI D338, GI 4454581), and DS05325 (PI D340, GI 4454581). The accession number for the two clones is AC007121. Other sequences bearing nucleotide homology with dSCAP are human mRNA for KIAA0199 gene (GI 1228046), and Cricetulus griseus SCAP mRNA (GI 1228046). At the protein level, dSCAP shares homology with the following sequences: C. elegans predicted SCAP D2013.8 (GI 642180), Homo sapiens KIAA0199 gene (GI 1228047), Cricetulus griseus SCAP (GI 1675220), and is similar to the transmembrane domain of HMG-CoA reductase (GI 3875380). EXAMPLE 7: TRANSGENIC DROSOPHILA MISEXPRESSING SREBP A constitutively active form of Drosophila SREBP (dSREBP.CA) was engineered for misexpression in Drosophila, to be used both as a screening or counter-screening reagent and a device to further elucidate the function of SREBP in Drosophila. dSREBP.CA contained amino acids 1-448 of dSREBP (SEQ ID NO:8), including the acid blob and bHLH-Zip domain, but terminated just prior to the first membrane-spanning domain, where a stop codon was added. It thus required no proteolytic processing for activation of transcriptional targets. The construct was cloned into pExPress-UAS. pExPress is a vector designed specifically for misexpression of genes in transgenic Drosophila that was derived from pGMR (Hay et al, supra). The vector is 9Kb long, and contains the following components: an origin of replication for E. coli, an ampicillin resistance gene, P element transposon ends, a White marker gene, and an expression unit comprising the TATA region of hsp70 enhancer and the 3' untranslated region from the -tubulin gene. The expression unit contains a first multiple cloning site (MCS) designed for insertion of an enhancer and a second MCS located 500 bases downstream, designed for the insertion of a gene of interest. dSREBP.CA was cloned into the EcoRI site of the second MCS. The expression construct was injected into yw Drosophila embryos using standard protocols for Drosophila transformation (Rubin and Spradling, supra). A variety of GAL4 driver lines were used to drive mis-expression of the transgenes. Driver lines Kruppel, Rhomboid, and 1878 are available from the University of Indiana (http://flybase.bio.indiana.edu) and drive expression in many tissues in 3 rd instar larvae, including the gut, fat body and nervous system. Lines T93 and Tl 13 were kindly provided by Tian Xu (Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT) and drive expression primarily in larval fat body. dSREBP.CA produced a lethal phenotype when expressed by the 1878, Kruppel, or Rhomboid drivers. Expression via the T93 driver produced a range of phenotypes which included reduced male viability, reduced female fertility, adults with shrunken abdomens and a starved appearance, persistence of the larval fat body in adults, and a short life span. Expression via the Tl 13 driver produced mostly pupal lethality. Most adult survivors were female and displayed the shrunken abdomen phenotype. These phenotypes, produced by expression primarily in the larval fat body, provided evidence that the dSREBP.CA transgene exerted metabolic effects. EXAMPLE 8: CLONING OF dSIP NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE The Drosophila homologue of mammalian SIP was cloned based on sequence from an EST library that was prepared from tissue from mixed stage embryos, larval imaginal discs, and adult fly heads. mRNA from these tissue was used to construct a random primer library that was normalized using a modification of the method described by Bonaldo et al. (Genome Research (1996 6:791-806). The total number of colonies picked for sequencing from the normalized library was 240,000. The reactions were primarily carried out with primer that initiated at the 5' end of the cDNA inserts. Clones that were of biological interest or that could extend assemblies of contiguous sequences ("contigs") were also sequenced from the 3' end. DNA sequencing was carried out using ABI377 automated sequencers and used either ABI FS, dirhodamine or BigDye chemistries (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA). Analysis of sequences was done using the program "Phred" (Gordon, Genome Res. (1998) 8:195-202). Each sequence was compared to all other fly EST sequences using the BLAST program and a filter to identify regions of near 100% identity. Sequences with potential overlap were then assembled into contigs using the programs "Phrap", "Phred" and "Consed" (Phil Green, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; http://bozeman.mbt.washington.edu/phrap.docs/phrap.html). The resulting assemblies were then compared to existing public databases and homology to known proteins was then used to direct translation of the consensus sequence. The contig sequences were archived in an Oracle-based relational database (FlyTag™, Exelixis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., South San Francisco, CA). The predicted full-length dSIP nucleic acid was amplified using PCR and sequenced. Sequences were assembled using Phred/Phrap and analyzed using Consed. This effort resulted in a contiguous nucleotide sequence of 3160 bases in length, encompassing an open reading frame (ORF) of 2979 nucleotides encoding a predicted protein of 993 amino acids. The ORF extends from base 62-3040 of SEQ ED NO:l. Upon completion of cloning, the sequences were analyzed using the Pfam (Bateman et al, Nucleic Acids Res. (1999) 27:260-262) and Prosite (Hofmann et al, Nucleic Acids Res. (1999) 27(1):215-219) programs to identify motifs in the resulting translations. Four transmembrane domains were predicted at amino acids 1-21, 363- 383, 458-478, and 500-520 (corresponding to nucleotides 62-130, 1150-1213, 1435- 1498, and 1561-1624, respectively). Prosite predicted homology to the peptidase_S8 subtilase family (PS00138) at amino acids 154-425 (nucleotides 523-1339). Nucleotide and amino acid sequences for the dSIP nucleic acid sequence and the encoded protein were searched against all available nucleotide and amino acid sequences in the public databases, using BLAST (Altschul et al, supra). At the protein level, the closest homologs predicted by BLAST analysis were the human and hamster SIP sequences (GI 4506775 and GI 7522635) and mouse and rat proteins related to subtilisin (GI4679093 and GI 4679095). EXAMPLE 9: GENETIC INTERACTIONS OF C. ELEGANS SREBP, INSULIN RECEPTOR, AND TGF-B PATHWAY GENES Genetic and Phenotypic Analyses: Loss-of-function and reduction-of function mutations in either the daf-2/ϊnR (GI2338417) or daf-7/TGF-β (GI1684866) signaling pathways that confer a dauer- constitutive phenotype also produce a dark intestine phenotype associated with increased accumulation of lipid droplets in the intestine (Kimura KD et al, Science (1997) 277:942-946). The dark intestine phenotype can occur in late larvae and adults independent of dauer formation, and appears to be the reciprocal of the pale intestine phenotype cause by reduction of SREBP function and associated with decreased accumulation of intestinal lipid droplets. We have demonstrated that mutations in daf-2/InR, daf-7/TGF-β, or downstream components in either pathway can partially suppress reduction of SREBP function. Specifically, daf-2 (el 370) (P1465S mutation in kinase domain; Kimura et al, supra) adults grown on E. coli expressing double-stranded RNA for part of the C elegans SREBP gene produced larvae and adults that showed significantly more intestinal pigmentation and lipid droplets than similarly treated wild-type animals. The accumulation of lipid droplets was intermediate in amount between that of RNAi - treated and untreated wild-type animals. This experiment was performed with the temperature-sensitive mutation daf-2 (el 370) at 20°C, a temperature at which most mutant animals develop to adulthood and display a dark intestine phenotype on wild- type E. coli. We also constructed a double mutant combination of daf-2 (el 370) with the partial deletion mutant ceSREBP (ep79). The daf-2 (el 370) mutation partially suppresses the pale intestine phenotype of the ceSREBP (ep79) mutant, as well as the small and thin body size phenotype and the small brood size phenotype. The ep79 mutation deletes the C-terminus of the SREBP protein, including the Site-1 protease and Site-2 protease processing sites but not the N-terminal transcription factor domain, and acts genetically as a reduction-of-function mutation. These results indicate that daf-2/lnR signaling antagonizes ceSREBP function independent of ceSREBP proteolytic processing. Two mutations, sa680 and sa709, in the pdk-1 fPDKl (GI5353962 and GI5353964) gene which acts downstream of daf-2/h-ιR (Paradis SM et al, Genes & Dev. (1999) 13:1438-1452) also partially suppressed the pale intestine phenotype of ceSREBP feeding RNAi to a similar degree as the daf-2 (el 370) mutant, pdk-1 (sa680) and pdk-1 (sa709) are also dauer-constitutive mutations that are temperature- sensitive and were tested at the permissive temperature of 20°C for suppression of ceSREBP reduction of function in non-dauer animals. The daf-7/TGF-β pathway acts in parallel with the daf-2/InR pathway in a non- redundant manner to inhibit dauer formation (Riddle DL and Albert PS, 1997, .in C. elegans II (eds. DL Riddle, T Blumenthal, BJ Meyer, and JR Priess), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 739-768.). Similar to daf-2/InR and pdk-1 /PDK1 mutants, the daf-7 (el 372) temperature-sensitive mutation (GI1684866; Ren PC et al, Science (1996) 274: 1389-1391) at the permissive temperatures 20°C and 15°C behaved as a weak suppressor of the pale intestine phenotype produced by RNAi of ceSREBP. The daf-14/Sm.ad gene (GI6110600) acts downstream of dαf 7/TGF- 3, and a putative null mutation of dαf-1 ' 4, m77 (Inoue T, and Thomas JH. Dev. Biol. (2000) 217: 192-204), partially suppressed the SREBP reduction of function. Interestingly, this suppression was nearly complete at 15°C. We can conclude that in C. elegans the InR and TGF-/3 signaling pathways normally down-regulate the lipid biosynthesis and/or uptake activity that the ceSREBP pathway normally up-regulates.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. An animal that is a fly or nematode that has been genetically modified to express or mis-express an SREBP pathway protein, or the progeny of said animal that has inherited said SREBP pathway protein expression or mis-expression. 2. The animal of Claim 1 that has been genetically modified by a method selected from the group consisting of transposon insertion mutagenesis, double-stranded RNA interference, and chemical mutagenesis. 3. The animal of Claim 1 wherein a heterologous promoter drives expression or mis-expression of said SREBP pathway protein. 4. The animal of Claim 3 wherein said promoter is selected from the group consisting of tissue-specific promoters, developmental-specific promoters, and inducible promoters. 5. The animal of Claim 4 wherein said animal is a fly and said promoter is selected from the group consisting of sevenless, eyeless, glass, dpp, heat shock, tTA- responsive, GAL4-responsive, and vestigal. 6. The animal of Claim 1 wherein said SREBP pathway protein is encoded by an SREBP pathway nucleic acid sequence linked to a nucleic acid sequence that encodes one or more selectable markers that allows detection of expression of said SREBP pathway protein. 7. The animal of Claim 1 wherein said expression or mis-expression of said SREBP pathway protein results in an identifiable phenotype. 8. The animal of Claim 1 wherein said SREBP pathway protein comprises an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, and 8, or a functionally-active fragment thereof. 9. The animal of Claim 8 wherein said SREBP pathway protein is encoded by part or all of a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ED NOs:l, 3, 5, and 7. 10. The animal of Claim 7 wherein said nematode is heterozygous for deletion of SREBP. 11. The animal of Claim 7 wherein said animal is a nematode and said identifiable phenotype is a pale intestine phenotype or other intestinal defect. 12. A method for studying lipid metabolism comprising detecting the phenotype caused by the expression or mis-expression of said SREBP pathway protein in the animal of Claim 1. 13. The method of Claim 12 additionally comprising observing a second animal having the same genetic modification as the animal of Claim 1 which causes said expression or mis-expression of said SREBP pathway protein, and wherein said second animal additionally comprises a mutation in a gene of interest, wherein differences, if any, between the phenotype of the animal of Claim 1 and the phenotype of the second animal identifies the gene of interest as capable of modifying the function of the gene encoding said SREBP pathway protein. 14. The method of Claim 13 wherein said gene of interest is implicated in a pathway selected from the group consisting of cholesterol or fatty acid biosynthesis or metabolism, insulin signaling, and TGF- 3 signaling. 15. The method of Claim 13 wherein said animal is a nematode and wherein said phenotype is a pale intestine phenotype or other intestinal defect indicative of abnormalities in lipid biosynthesis or metabolism. 16. The method of Claim 13 wherein said animal is a nematode and wherein said method includes staining said nematode in vivo with a fluorescently-labelled fatty acid conjugate to measure lipid content within said nematode. 17. The method of Claim 16 wherein said fluorescently-labelled fatty acid conjugate is a BODEPY™-fatty acid conjugate. 18. The method of Claim 13 additionally comprising administering one or more compounds to said animal or its progeny and observing any changes in lipid content of said animal or its progeny. 19. A method for determining the lipid content of a living nematode comprising contacting said nematode with a BODIPY™ fatty acid conjugate to stain lipid and measuring fluorescence as an indication of lipid content. 20. The method of Claim 19 which is used in combination with a genetic screen for detection of mutations that affect lipid content. 21. The method of Claim 19 that additionally includes administering one or more compounds to said nematode or its progeny and observing any effect said compound has on lipid content. 22. An isolated nucleic acid molecule of less than 15 kb comprising a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of: A) a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising at least 10 contiguous amino acids of the sequence of any one of SEQ ED NO:2, 4, and 6; B) a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising at least 16 contiguous amino acids of SEQ ED NO:8; and C) a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a polypeptide comprising at least 8 contiguous amino acids of residues 335 to 428 of SEQ ID NO:2. 23. The isolated nucleic acid molecule of Claim 22 that hybridizes under appropriate conditions to a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ED NOs:l, 3, 5 and 7. 24. The isolated nucleic acid molecule of Claim 23 wherein said appropriate conditions comprise hybridization at 34°C in a buffer comprising 6X SSC / 0% formamide and a wash at 45°C in a buffer comprising 2X SSC. 25. A vector comprising the nucleic acid molecule of Claim 22. 26. A host cell comprising the vector of Claim 25. 27. The host cell of Claim 26 wherein said cell is a yeast cell. 28. A process for producing an SREBP pathway protein comprising culturing the host cell of Claim 26 under conditions suitable for expression of said SREBP pathway protein and recovering said protein. 29. An isolated SREBP pathway protein produced by the process of Claim 28. 30. The isolated SREBP pathway protein of Claim 29 which is joined at its amino- or carboxy-terminus via a peptide bond to an amino acid sequence of a different protein. 31. A method of detecting a candidate molecule that binds to a polypeptide comprising SEQ ID 2, 4, 6, or 8 comprising: (a) contacting said polypeptide with one or more candidate molecules under conditions conducive to binding; and (b) detecting any binding that occurs between the candidate molecules and said polypeptide. SEQUENCE LISTING <110> EXELIXIS, INC. <120> ANIMAL MODELS AND METHODS FOR ANALYSIS OF LIPID METABOLISM AND SCREENING OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND PESTICIDAL AGENTS THAT MODULATE LIPID METABOLISM <130> SREBP-INT <140> EX99-004C-PCT <141> 2000-06-08 <150> 09/332,522 <151> 1999-06-14 <150> 60/189,700 <151> 2000-03-15 <160> 8 <170> Patentln Ver. 2.1 <210> 1 <211> 3419 <212> DNA <213> Caenorhabditis elegans <400> 1 ggtttaatta cccaagtttg agaatgaacg aagaattcga gggagacgtc cctatgtcgg 60 atccgtttct ctcattggtc acaaaattgg atgatattgc gccatttcca aataacgacc 120 cgctcgattt tgacatggag cacaactggc aagagcccgg accatcacaa caaccggatc 180 catcaattcc cggaaatcaa cacagtccgc cacaggaata ttatgatatt gatggtcaac 240 gagacgtaag caccttacac tccctgctca accacaacaa cgacgacttc ttctcaatgc 300 gattttcccc gccaaacttt gatctcggcg gaggccgtgg accttctcta gccgccaccc 360 aacaattatc tggagaaggt cctgcaagta tgcttaaccc cttacaaaca tctccaccaa 420 gtggaggtta ccccccggca gatgcctaca gacctctatc acttgctcaa caactcgccg 480 cgccagcgat gactccacat caggcagcgt cgctttttgt taatactaat ggaattgatc 540 aaaagaattt cactcatgca atgctatctt caccacacca tacctcaatg acttctcaac 600 catatacaga agccatggga catatcaacg ggtacatgtc tccatacgac caagctcaag 660 gcccatcagg accatcatat tactcacaac accatcaatc tccaccacct catcaccacc 720 atcaccaccc gatgccaaaa atccatgaga accctgaaca agtggcatct ccatcgattg 780 aagatgctcc agagacgaaa ccaactcatt tggttgaacc acaaagtcca aaaagcccgc 840 agaatatgaa agaggagctt cttcggttac tagttaacat gtctccgagt gaagttgaac 900 ggttaaagaa taaaaaatca ggagcatgtt cagcgacgaa tgggccatcg aggagtaagg 960 agaaggcggc gaagattgtg attcaggaga cagcggaagg ggatgaagat gaggatgatg 1020 aggatagtga ttccggggag actatgtctc agggaactac tattattgtt cgaagaccaa 1080 aaaccgagcg tcgtacggca cacaatctca tcgaaaagaa gtatagatgc tcaataaatg 1140 atcgaattca acagctgaaa gtacttttgt gtggggatga agctaagctt tcaaaatcgg 1200 caacactacg acgggctatt gaacatatcg aggaggttga acacgagaat caggtgttga 1260 agcatcatgt tgaacaaatg agaaagacac tgcagaataa tcgattaccg tacccggaac 1320 caattcaata cactgaatac tctgcccgat cacccgtcga atcatctcct tctccaccta 1380 gaaatgagag aaaacgatca cgaatgagca caacgactcc tatgaagaat ggaactagag 1440 atggatcttc gaaagttacc ctttttgcga tgctcctagc agttctgatt tttaatccga 1500 ttggattgct cgctggaagt gcgatattct caaaagccgc tgcagaagct ccgattgcct 1560 ccccgttcga gcatggaaga gtgattgatg acccggatgg aactagcact cggacgcttt 1620 tctgggaagg gagtatcatc aatatgagct atgtctgggt gttcaacatc ttaatgatca 1680 tatatgtggt tgtcaaactg ctgatccatg gtgaccctgt tcaagacttc atgtccgttt 1740 catggcagac ttttgtgacg actcgagaga aggcgagagc cgagttgaac tctggaaatt 1800 tgaaagatgc tcagagaaag ttctgcgagt gtcttgcaac gttggatcga tcgcttccat 1860 caccgggggt tgattcggtg ttttcggttg gctgggaatg cgttcgacat cttttgaatt 1920 ggttgtggat cgggagatac atcgcaagaa ggcgcaggtc caccacgaag cctgtctcag 1980 tcgtttgtag gagtcatgcg cagactgcag ttctctatca tgaaattcat cagctccatc 2040 taatgggtat cactggaaac ttcgaagaca cctatgaacc atccgcccta acgggcctct 2100 tcatgtccct ctgtgcagta aaccttgctg aagctgccgg agcatcaaac gacggacttc 2160 cacgcgccgt catggctcag atctacattt ctgcatccat ccaatgccgt ttggctcttc 2220 cgaacctact cgcaccattc ttctcgggat actttttacg aagagctcga aggcacgtgc 2280 gtcgagctcc ggagcactcg gtgtcccatt tgttatggat cttccatcca gcgacaagaa 2340 agttcatgtc agatgcgaaa aggttggagc atgtgttgag ctcgaagcag aagcagttga 2400 gatttgggtc ttttgtggaa gatgagcaat tatccccact tgctcgaatc cgaacaacgc 2460 tgaaagtgta cctactctcc aaacttgtac aggaacttgt cggtggtgac gagatcttta 2520 caaaaaatgt ggaacgcatc ctaaatgaca atgaccgtct cgatgatgaa gtagacgtgg 2580 ttgatgtttc aagacttttg gtgacaattt caacgcagtg cgctgccatt ttgactaatg 2640 agaaggatga gtcagcgaaa ttcggaacct ggatctctcg aaacggagat gcttgttgca 2700 catggtggac gcacgttctg acatgtggaa tctattggag gagtaacaag aatgagctgg 2760 cacggcaaca ctattcactg atcaggaact gtccgccgaa gattttgaca gacaatctgg 2820 gtttggcggt tggccacgcg ttgtgtgctc gcaagatttg catagatgac cgagattccc 2880 cgaaagtcag tcaatacgtg tgcattcaca caaagaagtc gctcgaatcc ctccgactat 2940 tctccacatc atcgcgagca tcaggtgtgg tgtctggaat tcaggaaggt acacgccgaa 3000 tggcctacga atggattatg aactcgctgc tcgacgcgtg gcgttccaat ctattcgcat 3060 cgaaacccta ctggacacaa agcttcaagg gacaatccac gtttagtacg ctttatcaag 3120 aggcgtataa tcattatgcg attattaatg ggacaagggg agattgttgg agactatttg 3180 tctacgagct cacgtgccga atgctcaacg gagccaaccc acaagccacg tggtcaggcg 3240 yccgacgcgt tcgatctaca aaaatggacg cggtccgagg aagagtgagc atgcgacgct 3300 cggctcaacc ggacgcattt catcttcata cactggttaa actacatact tctatggatc 3360 tttgaattga acaaaaaatg attttattca gaataatgat aaatacgatt atatataaa 3419 <210> 2 <211> 1113 <212> PRT <213> Caenorhabditis elegans <400> 2 Met Asn Glu Glu Phe Glu Gly Asp Val Pro Met Ser Asp Pro Phe Leu 1 5 10 15 Ser Leu Val Thr Lys Leu Asp Asp lie Ala Pro Phe Pro Asn Asn Asp 20 25 30 Pro Leu Asp Phe Asp Met Glu His Asn Trp Gin Glu Pro Gly Pro Ser 35 40 45 Gin Gin Pro Asp Pro Ser lie Pro Gly Asn Gin His Ser Pro Pro Gin 50 55 60 Glu Tyr Tyr Asp lie Asp Gly Gin Arg Asp Val Ser Thr Leu His Ser 65 70 75 80 Leu Leu Asn His Asn Asn Asp Asp Phe Phe Ser Met Arg Phe Ser Pro 85 90 95 Pro Asn Phe Asp Leu Gly Gly Gly Arg Gly Pro Ser Leu Ala Ala Thr . 100 105 110 Gin Gin Leu Ser Gly Glu Gly Pro Ala Ser Met Leu Asn Pro Leu Gin 115 120 125 Thr Ser Pro Pro Ser Gly Gly Tyr Pro Pro Ala Asp Ala Tyr Arg Pro 130 135 140 Leu Ser Leu Ala Gin Gin Leu Ala Ala Pro Ala Met Thr Pro His Gin 145 150 155 160 Ala Ala Ser Leu Phe Val Asn Thr Asn Gly lie Asp Gin Lys Asn Phe 165 170 175 Thr His Ala Met Leu Ser Ser Pro His His Thr Ser Met Thr Ser Gin 180 185 190 Pro Tyr Thr Glu Ala Met Gly His lie Asn Gly Tyr Met Ser Pro Tyr 195 200 205 Asp Gin Ala Gin Gly Pro Ser Gly Pro Ser Tyr Tyr Ser Gin His His 210 215 220 Gin Ser Pro Pro Pro His His His His His His Pro Met Pro Lys lie 225 230 235 240 His Glu Asn Pro Glu Gin Val Ala Ser Pro Ser lie Glu Asp Ala Pro 245 250 255 Glu Thr Lys Pro Thr His Leu Val Glu Pro Gin Ser Pro Lys Ser Pro 260 265 270 Gin Asn Met Lys Glu Glu Leu Leu Arg Leu Leu Val Asn Met Ser Pro 275 280 285 Ser Glu Val Glu Arg Leu Lys Asn Lys Lys Ser Gly Ala Cys Ser Ala 290 295 300 Thr Asn Gly Pro Ser Arg Ser Lys Glu Lys Ala Ala Lys lie Val lie 305 310 315 320 Gin Glu Thr Ala Glu Gly Asp Glu Asp Glu Asp Asp Glu Asp Ser Asp 325 330 335 Ser Gly Glu Thr Met Ser Gin Gly Thr Thr lie lie Val Arg Arg Pro 340 345 350 Lys Thr Glu Arg Arg Thr Ala His Asn Leu lie Glu Lys Lys Tyr Arg 355 . 360 365 Cys Ser lie Asn Asp Arg lie Gin Gin Leu Lys Val Leu Leu Cys Gly 370 375 380 Asp Glu Ala Lys Leu Ser Lys Ser Ala Thr Leu Arg Arg Ala lie Glu 385 390 395 400 His lie Glu Glu Val Glu His Glu Asn Gin Val Leu Lys His His Val 405 410 415 Glu Gin Met Arg Lys Thr Leu Gin Asn Asn Arg Leu Pro Tyr Pro Glu 420 425 430 Pro lie Gin Tyr Thr Glu Tyr Ser Ala Arg Ser Pro Val Glu Ser Ser 435 440 445 Pro Ser Pro Pro Arg Asn Glu Arg Lys Arg Ser Arg Met Ser Thr Thr 450 455 460 Thr Pro Met Lys Asn Gly Thr Arg Asp Gly Ser Ser Lys Val Thr Leu 465 470 475 480 Phe Ala Met Leu Leu Ala Val Leu lie Phe Asn Pro lie Gly Leu Leu 485 490 495 Ala Gly Ser Ala lie Phe Ser Lys Ala Ala Ala Glu Ala Pro lie Ala 500 505 510 Ser Pro Phe Glu His Gly Arg Val lie Asp Asp Pro Asp Gly Thr Ser 515 520 525 Thr Arg Thr Leu Phe Trp Glu Gly Ser lie lie Asn Met Ser Tyr Val 530 535 540 Trp Val Phe Asn lie Leu Met lie lie Tyr Val Val Val Lys Leu Leu 545 550 555 560 lie His Gly Asp Pro Val Gin Asp Phe Met Ser Val Ser Trp Gin Thr 565 570 575 Phe Val Thr Thr Arg Glu Lys Ala Arg Ala Glu Leu Asn Ser Gly Asn 580 585 590 Leu Lys Asp Ala Gin Arg Lys Phe Cys Glu Cys Leu Ala Thr Leu Asp 595 600 605 Arg Ser Leu Pro Ser Pro Gly Val Asp Ser Val Phe Ser Val Gly Trp 610 615 620 Glu Cys Val Arg His Leu Leu Asn Trp Leu Trp lie Gly Arg Tyr lie 625 630 635 640 Ala Arg Arg Arg Arg Ser Thr Thr Lys Pro Val Ser Val Val Cys Arg 645 650 655 Ser His Ala Gin Thr Ala Val Leu Tyr His Glu lie His Gin Leu His 660 665 670 Leu Met Gly lie Thr Gly Asn Phe Glu Asp Thr Tyr Glu Pro Ser Ala 675 680 685 Leu Thr Gly Leu Phe Met Ser Leu Cys Ala Val Asn Leu Ala Glu Ala 690 695 700 Ala Gly Ala Ser Asn Asp Gly Leu Pro Arg Ala Val Met Ala Gin lie 705 710 715 720 Tyr lie Ser Ala Ser lie Gin Cys Arg Leu Ala Leu Pro Asn Leu Leu 725 730 735 Ala Pro Phe Phe Ser Gly Tyr Phe Leu Arg Arg Ala Arg Arg His Val 740 745 750 Arg Arg Ala Pro Glu His Ser Val Ser His Leu Leu Trp lie Phe His 755 760 765 Pro Ala Thr Arg Lys Phe Met Ser Asp Ala Lys Arg Leu Glu His Val 770 775 780 Leu Ser Ser Lys Gin Lys Gin Leu Arg Phe Gly Ser Phe Val Glu Asp 785 790 795 800 Glu Gin Leu Ser Pro Leu Ala Arg lie Arg Thr Thr Leu Lys Val Tyr 805 810 815 Leu Leu Ser Lys Leu Val Gin Glu Leu Val Gly Gly Asp Glu lie Phe 820 825 830 Thr Lys Asn Val Glu Arg lie Leu Asn Asp Asn Asp Arg Leu Asp Asp 835 840 845 Glu Val Asp Val Val Asp Val Ser Arg Leu Leu Val Thr lie Ser Thr 850 855 860 Gin Cys Ala Ala lie Leu Thr Asn Glu Lys Asp Glu Ser Ala Lys Phe 865 870 875 880 Gly Thr Trp lie Ser Arg Asn Gly Asp Ala Cys Cys Thr Trp Trp Thr 885 890 895 His Val Leu Thr Cys Gly lie Tyr Trp Arg Ser Asn Lys Asn Glu Leu 900 905 910 Ala Arg Gin His Tyr Ser Leu lie Arg Asn Cys Pro Pro Lys lie Leu 915 920 925 Thr Asp Asn Leu Gly Leu Ala Val Gly His Ala Leu Cys Ala Arg Lys 930 935 940 lie Cys lie Asp Asp Arg Asp Ser Pro Lys Val Ser Gin Tyr Val Cys 945 950 955 960 lie His Thr Lys Lys Ser Leu Glu Ser Leu Arg Leu Phe Ser Thr Ser 965 970 975 Ser Arg Ala Ser Gly Val Val Ser Gly lie Gin Glu Gly Thr Arg Arg 980 985 990 Met Ala Tyr Glu Trp lie Met Asn Ser Leu Leu Asp Ala Trp Arg Ser 995 1000 1005 Asn Leu Phe Ala Ser Lys Pro Tyr Trp Thr Gin Ser Phe Lys Gly Gin 1010 1015 1020 Ser Thr Phe Ser Thr Leu Tyr Gin Glu Ala Tyr Asn His Tyr Ala lie 1025 1030 1035 1040 lie Asn Gly Thr Arg Gly Asp Cys Trp Arg Leu Phe Val Tyr Glu Leu 1045 1050 1055 Thr Cys Arg Met Leu Asn Gly Ala Asn Pro Gin Ala Thr Trp Ser Gly 1060 1065 1070 Xaa Arg Arg Val Arg Ser Thr Lys Met Asp Ala Val Arg Gly Arg Val 1075 1080 1085 Ser Met Arg Arg Ser Ala Gin Pro Asp Ala Phe His Leu His Thr Leu 1090 1095 1100 Val Lys Leu His Thr Ser Met Asp Leu 1105 1110 <210> 3 <211> 1971 <212> DNA <213> Drosophila melanogaster <400> 3 cggcacgagg attaatgctg atttctggtc tggactacac agcattgctg gtataaggag 60 tcgggaccag aggagtaaga tttcgggaag gaatcccgtc cggtagggac tactagcatt 120 cgcaagtgac gtccagcaac cggaggaccc ccaactgtag aatccgcatc accatcctaa 180 tcccaacaaa ccaatgacat cttgagacct caccagccat ggatcccttc gtgttcttca 240 tagtactggc atcgctttat ggcgttcttt actttttcga ccgcttcttc aagagttgca 300 tgcactaccc gtacgatgcc ttcctcaaga acaccgggct gagtataaat ttcatgagcc 360 tccactggca cacgagtgcc tttaacagga ccctcctacg ctggggatct gccggtaaca 420 gctgcacccg gagagtaatg atcaccagct ttaatgtagg agtcctggtc accttttctc 480 tgctcccgat cggtctgatc ctgctcattg ccactatctt cagcagtggt gaacaagaca 540 gctcttcgtc tgtatcctcg cccgttggag tccctgtgca gctggaaatt ctactgcccg 600 gcgtcaactt gccgttggag gagatcggat actacatcac aacccttgtg ctctgcttgg 660 tggtgcacga gatgggacac gccctggccg ctgtgatgga ggatgtgcct gtcaccgggt 720 ttggaataaa gttcatcttc tgcctgccgt tagcatacac ggagctctcc cacgaccact 780 taaacagtct acgttggttc cgcaagctac gtgttctgtg cgctggaatc tggcataatt 840 ttgtgttcgc tggcgtgtgc tatctcttaa tctcaacggt gggaatcact atgtcacctt 900 tgtacgctta caaccaacac gtagtggtca ctgaactaac aaggaaatcc ccgctgaggg 960 gagagcgcgg cttgcaagtg gacaatcaaa taacccaagt aaacggctgc ccagtaaaca 1020 gcgaggagag ttgggtgaca tgcctgcaga actctctgaa gctcaagccg ggctactgtg 1080 tgagtgcgga cttcgtgcag cttaacgacg aaagcagcgc catctcacat catagcattg 1140 atggtcagct acagtgctgt gatgaactaa atccgaacgt aagctgcttc gaggtggtgg 1200 aggacgcaaa tggagatgtg ccggtggagc tgccgcagca tgtatgtctc aatgtgcgcc 1260 gcactttgga ggaggtctcc gagcactgct cgtccggagt ttgcaacgag ggattctgcc 1320 tacgaccgct tatacgaaat atcactgcca taatgacgtt caagcgacag aattttcgcg 1380 gagagaagct gccgccggtg atctatgtgg gccatccatg ggatgtcact cgaactgtgg 1440 aggtatccgc ctttgtgccg agatatagct tattaaaggc agcctggccg gatgcctggc 1500 tgctgctcct caagtataac gtggtcttca gcataggatt ggcgttgatc aatgccattc 1560 cctgctttgg tttcgatggc gcccacatta ccagcaccgt gatacacagc ttcttggtgg 1620 gcagagtgga tcagcatgcc aagagagata tcatctcgtt gataatcacc agcgtgggtt 1680 cccttctctt tgcactggcc ctgcttaagg tggcctggtt gagttttctg cgacccctgc 1740 tttaagaact gaaatggaaa actgaaatgg atcctgggag ttcaactccc tgcaaagacg 1800 ctagactgct atttcacctt cacgaaacac acaaaaacac agcgaattgt agcacctcaa 1860 agattcgata gctttttgtc atagtcctta gtcttaactc gtatttattt tcgtacggtt 1920 gtcgagctca aaaataaaat caaattaagc taaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa c 1971 <210> 4 <211> 508 <212> PRT <213> Drosophila melanogaster <400> 4 Met Asp Pro Phe Val Phe Phe lie Val Leu Ala Ser Leu Tyr Gly Val 1 . 5 10 15 Leu Tyr Phe Phe Asp Arg Phe Phe Lys Ser Cys Met His Tyr Pro Tyr 20 25 30 Asp Ala Phe Leu Lys Asn Thr Gly Leu Ser lie Asn Phe Met Ser Leu 35 40 45 His Trp His Thr Ser Ala Phe Asn Arg Thr Leu Leu Arg Trp Gly Ser 50 55 60 Ala Gly Asn Ser Cys Thr Arg Arg Val Met lie Thr Ser Phe Asn Val 65 70 75 80 Gly Val Leu Val Thr Phe Ser Leu Leu Pro lie Gly Leu lie Leu Leu 85 90 95 lie Ala Thr lie Phe Ser Ser Gly Glu Gin Asp Ser Ser Ser Ser Val 100 105 110 Ser Ser Pro Val Gly Val Pro Val Gin Leu Glu lie Leu Leu Pro Gly 115 120 125 Val Asn Leu Pro Leu Glu Glu lie Gly Tyr Tyr lie Thr Thr Leu Val 130 135 140 Leu Cys Leu Val Val His Glu Met Gly His Ala Leu Ala Ala Val Met 145 150 155 160 Glu Asp Val Pro Val Thr Gly Phe Gly lie Lys Phe lie Phe Cys Leu 165 170 175 Pro Leu Ala Tyr Thr Glu Leu Ser His Asp His Leu Asn Ser Leu Arg 180 185 190 Trp Phe Arg Lys Leu Arg Val Leu Cys Ala Gly lie Trp His Asn Phe 195 200 205 Val Phe Ala Gly Val Cys Tyr Leu Leu lie Ser Thr Val Gly lie Thr 210 215 220 Met Ser Pro Leu Tyr Ala Tyr Asn Gin His Val Val Val Thr Glu Leu 225 230 235 240 Thr Arg Lys Ser Pro Leu Arg Gly Glu Arg Gly Leu Gin Val Asp Asn 245 250 255 Gin lie Thr Gin Val Asn Gly Cys Pro Val Asn Ser Glu Glu Ser Trp 260 265 270 Val Thr Cys Leu Gin Asn Ser Leu Lys Leu Lys Pro Gly Tyr Cys Val 275 280 285 Ser Ala Asp Phe Val Gin Leu Asn Asp Glu Ser Ser Ala lie Ser His 290 295 300 His Ser lie Asp Gly Gin Leu Gin Cys Cys Asp Glu Leu Asn Pro Asn 305 310 315 320 Val Ser Cys Phe Glu Val Val Glu Asp Ala Asn Gly Asp Val Pro Val 325 330 335 Glu Leu Pro Gin His Val Cys Leu Asn Val Arg Arg Thr Leu Glu Glu 340 345 350 Val Ser Glu His Cys Ser Ser Gly Val Cys Asn Glu Gly Phe Cys Leu 355 360 365 Arg Pro Leu lie Arg Asn lie Thr Ala lie Met Thr Phe Lys Arg Gin 370 375 380 Asn Phe Arg Gly Glu Lys Leu Pro Pro Val lie Tyr Val Gly His Pro 385 390 395 400 Trp Asp Val Thr Arg Thr Val Glu Val Ser Ala Phe Val Pro Arg Tyr 405 410 415 Ser Leu Leu Lys Ala Ala Trp Pro Asp Ala Trp Leu Leu Leu Leu Lys 420 425 430 Tyr Asn Val Val Phe Ser lie Gly Leu Ala Leu lie Asn Ala lie Pro 435 440 445 Cys Phe Gly Phe Asp Gly Ala His lie Thr Ser Thr Val lie His Ser 450 455 460 Phe Leu Val Gly Arg Val Asp Gin His Ala Lys Arg Asp lie lie Ser 465 470 475 480 Leu lie He Thr Ser Val Gly Ser Leu Leu Phe Ala Leu Ala Leu Leu 485 490 495 Lys Val Ala Trp Leu Ser Phe Leu Arg Pro Leu Leu 500 505 <210> 5 <211> 4128 <212> DNA <213> Drosophila melanogaster <400> 5 gtgtgcctga ctgttttgta ggtgtaagga ggggcgtggc caaatagttt ttggtatacg 60 gatagaattt ggatgaaaaa taaaacgaaa tcaaaacatt tttcaaaagc gtggaagttt 120 tggccggctt gtgggcatgg caaaacgttt tttggctatc cgttaatcaa cataccgttg 180 cccgggacaa tacccaccaa gatcgttgta ccctacgaaa ctggatccgg atcgctgtca 240 tggcactctc ttaatacatc ctcgactaca ccgcaggaac cgcacccttc cggcgaaccc 300 tggccccccg aaccacaggt actcaatagc agtaccacgg accgcagccc gcctcccctt 360 ctgccctggg cgcagagcag ccccgccttt ttctacgtcc agcagattac tctgcgaacc 420 agtgttctcc cgtggacgga gggaatgcag cttatggatg cgtttcgtgc gccgctacac 480 gaagttttta aattgcttga aattgtgcgc aatcaccaga gcagcgaaaa caaacgtacc 540 ctggagcaca actgcctaca tgtagacaac gtaaagcgcg gaacacacgg gcagctggac 600 cagatctttc cggagtatgg ctgcctgctg ctctcgcccg ccaacctgtg gacgcagaac 660 tctcagaact ttactcggga cacaaacatc ctgaacacga tatttcagta ccataaccta 720 cagaaatcaa aagtttccgc ggcggaaatg ctgtttggat tacccatgca ggacactgga 780 ttcaagcgct atccattgcg cgctcggtcg cgtattatac agtatgcctt gacgttattc 840 ctcaagcaca acgatatgga gtatctggac actctaaagg aaaagctgct gcgacactat 900 cccccactcc cgttggctag tgcgtcggct gaagagccga cgaccataac ttacatcttt 960 tatccaggag agtacaggat gtgggagctg gtgccttaca cagtggcctt tatgttggtg 1020 tttgcttatg tgtacttctc tgttcgaaaa atcgatgtat ttcgttcccg ctttttgctg 1080 gccttatgta gcgtaatcac cacagccggg agcttggcca tgtcccttgg cttgtgtttc 1140 ttctttggcc tgacaatttc gctgcagtca aaggacattt tcccctacct tgtaatcctt 1200 gtgggattgg aaaatagctt ggtgatcaca aagagcgtag tctcaatgga cgagacattc 1260 gacgtgaaga tccgcgtggc gcaggctctt agcaaggagg gttggcatat atccaagact 1320 cttttgacgg agataacaat tttgacaatt ggtcttgcta ctttcgtgcc cgtcatccag 1380 gagttttgta tctttgccat agtcggcttg ctttccgatt ttatgctaca gatgctgctc 1440 ttctcaacaa tactggccat gaacattaag cggaccgagt atacggcgga ggccaagcac 1500 10 cttcctaaga tgttgctgag ctgcacccaa ggggctggtc gacaggattt ccgatttttc 1560 ggggccgccc cagcactgcc accgtttgtc cctggcacat ttcagcgttc tcagtcgcat 1620 ccaaaactgt gttttgctga tcccgcatct gttagcgatc gtacaagctt ggttaatgga 1680 cactcgtcgc cggagcaacg aatacccaaa cgcataaaga ttgtaaattt ctgggcgcgg 1740 actcgctttt ttcagcgtgc cttcatgatc tggatgattg tgtggatatg ctctatagtt 1800 tataattcgg gatatctgga gcagttgttt agcatgcaga gcaacggcac aatgacggca 1860 acccttgaac ttcaacggcg actacaggcg ggtcggggag cagtcagcag ttttttcgag 1920 ggatggcaag cggacgggca gcgtgccacg agtgcgccaa gcggaagcgg cttttctacg 1980 ccaataaaag ctcctctagc gatcgatata aacgaaacgg ccgaggaaat gatgagactt 2040 cgatatccca gcttcgacct aaactatttc ctttcaaact tccactggtc cacgattatg 2100 aaacagtaca acatctcact aagtgggcac tacgttaccc tgctaccgac cattcgcctt 2160 agtcatgcca tcgctccgga gctagccact ctgttgcgga atccgcagga gcagctgcaa 2220 caaaattttc aatggaaggc cctagccgct gcactcgatc cgctggactt taacgatgac 2280 gacgtgcgcc gtgagtctcc gatggtaatg gcagaggggt tgcctctggt tcccaagagc 2340 cccatggaaa tatttttcgc catcctcttg tgctgcatca gcatcttcgt gctttgctac 2400 acgatggtgg ttttctaccg ctgcatatgt accaggaact atgccgagtg gcgctccagt 2460 tggcacgaat ctgaggcacc gtacaagcag actgagcaaa tcctggaggg agttccaacg 2520 caaatcgccg gacacaaaca tcgcattgaa tgcctggtgt ctgacggcgc ctacataatc 2580 agctgctgcc ttaaaggcca aatccgagtg tgggatgcac gcagtggcga gcagctaacc 2640 agcatctccc gatccgatat tcagatctct cagcagcgga cggatgggca gacgctggta 2700 cgaaagctgg ccgtgtcacc ggtctggtgc cttgactact tcgataatct aatcgcagta 2760 ggctgcgcca acggccgcgt agaattgtgg gaatcccctg cgggattgct taagtgtgca 2820 taccaggaag acgcgaagag aaaccagggt ataacccaca tccacctgaa cggcgatcga 2880 gtgattgtgg cgcgtcttaa tggccgacta gatttttacc gcttagagac gtactacaag 2940 gggaagcaaa tcgactgggg ttttacctcg gcttacagga gaactcatgt tcgaactgga 3000 tccactggaa gcctgggatt aatgttgcag cagcagcgct gtcagcaaga agcatcccag 3060 aagaccacca aggaggaaat gaaaatcaca ttggagggtg taagactagc ccatcagcag 3120 ccaatcacat gcatgcaggt cgttaacgac atggttttca ctggcagcca ggatcacacc 3180 ctcaaggtgt attgcctcaa taagtcggat gttgagtata cgctccacgg tcactgtggg 3240 cctgtaacct gtctctttgt ggatcgctgg caacctggca caggggggtc tgggtcccag 3300 gacggcctgc tctgcgtatg ggatctgttc acgggagcct gcatgtataa tatacaagct 3360 cacgacggag ccgtcagctg cctggcctgt gcgcccagtt acgtaatctc gctaggcacg 3420 gacgagagga tttgcgtatg ggaacgattt cagggaaacc tgttgactac catcaacatc 3480 tcaaacgcat actcgagcct actgatgcta acaccgtcac tattggttac gagcaaaatg 3540 ggtaaggcct cattcttgat tgccaatata agagggacag taaataataa atttaattcc 3600 aacacaggat ctcttattgt gtgggatgtg cgcactgggc agccggctcg cgaggtcaaa 3660 ctggactttg caaacctgca gctctgtccc aaaataatga tgcttgcctg cgattcggta 3720 gtttgcgact acggaaatga gatccgcgtc gtccgctttc ctatcgtggc agacaagtgc 3780 cattaaagcg caaaatttta atttagcgtg gttcgctagc acctaggaat aagttgactt 3840 aaggctttaa aacgcctgga agtcattgac gcattcacta ttttatataa atatatacac 3900 tattagggtc cgcagcaact tacggtttta acacaagctg tacgtatctc atctctagaa 3960 ttttgtgtta gtttgtggac actaagtgta acagctacgc tccggtaggt taaggaacta 4020 aactaaatga atcagatata tacacatata ttttcgcgta attatataaa ctacatagtg 4080 tcttaaagcg cctcagccta atataaaatg actaaatgtt aaaataaa 4128 <210> 6 <211> 1237 11 <212> PRT <213> Drosophila melanogaster <400> 6 Met Lys Asn Lys Thr Lys Ser Lys His Phe Ser Lys Ala Trp Lys Phe 1 5 10 15 Trp Pro Ala Cys Gly His Gly Lys Thr Phe Phe Gly Tyr Pro Leu He 20 25 30 Asn He Pro Leu Pro Gly Thr He Pro Thr Lys He Val Val Pro Tyr 35 40 45 Glu Thr Gly Ser Gly Ser Leu Ser Trp His Ser Leu Asn Thr Ser Ser 50 55 60 Thr Thr Pro Gin Glu Pro His Pro Ser Gly Glu Pro Trp Pro Pro Glu 65 70 75 80 Pro Gin Val Leu Asn Ser Ser Thr Thr Asp Arg Ser Pro Pro Pro Leu 85 90 95 Leu Pro Trp Ala Gin Ser Ser Pro Ala Phe Phe Tyr Val Gin Gin He 100 105 110 Thr Leu Arg Thr Ser Val Leu Pro Trp Thr Glu Gly Met Gin Leu Met 115 120 125 Asp Ala Phe Arg Ala Pro Leu His Glu Val Phe Lys Leu Leu Glu He 130 135 140 Val Arg Asn His Gin Ser Ser Glu Asn Lys Arg Thr Leu Glu His Asn 145 150 155 160 Cys Leu His Val Asp Asn Val Lys Arg Gly Thr His Gly Gin Leu Asp 165 170 175 Gin He Phe Pro Glu Tyr Gly Cys Leu Leu Leu Ser Pro Ala Asn Leu 180 185 190 Trp Thr Gin Asn Ser Gin Asn Phe Thr Arg Asp Thr Asn He Leu Asn 195 200 205 Thr He Phe Gin Tyr His Asn Leu Gin Lys Ser Lys Val Ser Ala Ala 210 215 220 Glu Met Leu Phe Gly Leu Pro Met Gin Asp Thr Gly Phe Lys Arg Tyr 225 230 235 240 12 Pro Leu Arg Ala Arg Ser Arg He He Gin Tyr Ala Leu Thr Leu Phe 245 250 255 Leu Lys His Asn Asp Met Glu Tyr Leu Asp Thr Leu Lys Glu Lys Leu 260 265 270 Leu Arg His Tyr Pro Pro Leu Pro Leu Ala Ser Ala Ser Ala Glu Glu 275 280 285 Pro Thr Thr He Thr Tyr He Phe Tyr Pro Gly Glu Tyr Arg Met Trp 290 295 300 Glu Leu Val Pro Tyr Thr Val Ala Phe Met Leu Val Phe Ala Tyr Val 305 310 315 320 Tyr Phe Ser Val Arg Lys He Asp Val Phe Arg Ser Arg Phe Leu Leu 325 330 335 Ala Leu Cys Ser Val He Thr Thr Ala Gly Ser Leu Ala Met Ser Leu 340 345 350 Gly Leu Cys Phe Phe Phe Gly Leu Thr He Ser Leu Gin Ser Lys Asp 355 360 365 He Phe Pro Tyr Leu Val He Leu Val Gly Leu Glu Asn Ser Leu Val 370 375 380 He Thr Lys Ser Val Val Ser Met Asp Glu Thr Phe Asp Val Lys He 385 390 395 400 Arg Val Ala Gin Ala Leu Ser Lys Glu Gly Trp His He Ser Lys Thr 405 410 415 Leu Leu Thr Glu He Thr He Leu Thr He Gly Leu Ala Thr Phe Val 420 425 430 Pro Val He Gin Glu Phe Cys He Phe Ala He Val Gly Leu Leu Ser 435 440 445 Asp Phe Met Leu Gin Met Leu Leu Phe Ser Thr He Leu Ala Met Asn 450 455 460 He Lys Arg Thr Glu Tyr Thr Ala Glu Ala Lys His Leu Pro Lys Met 465 470 475 480 Leu Leu Ser Cys Thr Gin Gly Ala Gly Arg Gin Asp Phe Arg Phe Phe 485 490 495 13 Gly Ala Ala Pro Ala Leu Pro Pro Phe Val Pro Gly Thr Phe Gin Arg 500 505 510 Ser Gin Ser His Pro Lys Leu Cys Phe Ala Asp Pro Ala Ser Val Ser 515 520 525 Asp Arg Thr Ser Leu Val Asn Gly His Ser Ser Pro Glu Gin Arg He 530 535 540 Pro Lys Arg He Lys He Val Asn Phe Trp Ala Arg Thr Arg Phe Phe 545 550 555 560 Gin Arg Ala Phe Met He Trp Met He Val Trp He Cys Ser He Val 565 570 575 Tyr Asn Ser Gly Tyr Leu Glu Gin Leu Phe Ser Met Gin Ser Asn Gly 580 585 590 Thr Met Thr Ala Thr Leu Glu Leu Gin Arg Arg Leu Gin Ala Gly Arg 595 600 605 Gly Ala Val Ser Ser Phe Phe Glu Gly Trp Gin Ala Asp Gly Gin Arg 610 615 620 Ala Thr Ser Ala Pro Ser Gly Ser Gly Phe Ser Thr Pro He Lys Ala 625 630 635 640 Pro Leu Ala He Asp He Asn Glu Thr Ala Glu Glu Met Met Arg Leu 645 650 655 Arg Tyr Pro Ser Phe Asp Leu Asn Tyr Phe Leu Ser Asn Phe His Trp 660 665 670 Ser Thr He Met Lys Gin Tyr Asn He Ser Leu Ser Gly His Tyr Val 675 680 685 Thr Leu Leu Pro Thr He Arg Leu Ser His Ala He Ala Pro Glu Leu 690 695 700 Ala Thr Leu Leu Arg Asn Pro Gin Glu Gin Leu Gin Gin Asn Phe Gin 705 710 715 720 Trp Lys Ala Leu Ala Ala Ala Leu Asp Pro Leu Asp Phe Asn Asp Asp 725 730 735 Asp Val Arg Arg Glu Ser Pro Met Val Met Ala Glu Gly Leu Pro Leu 740 745 750 14 Val Pro Lys Ser Pro Met Glu He Phe Phe Ala He Leu Leu Cys Cys 755 760 765 He Ser He Phe Val Leu Cys Tyr Thr Met Val Val Phe Tyr Arg Cys 770 775 780 He Cys Thr Arg Asn Tyr Ala Glu Trp Arg Ser Ser Trp His Glu Ser 785 790 795 800 Glu Ala Pro Tyr Lys Gin Thr Glu Gin He Leu Glu Gly Val Pro Thr 805 810 815 Gin He Ala Gly His Lys His Arg He Glu Cys Leu Val Ser Asp Gly 820 825 830 Ala Tyr He He Ser Cys Cys Leu Lys Gly Gin He Arg Val Trp Asp 835 . 840 845 Ala Arg Ser Gly Glu Gin Leu Thr Ser He Ser Arg Ser Asp He Gin 850 855 860 He Ser Gin Gin Arg Thr Asp Gly Gin Thr Leu Val Arg Lys Leu Ala 865 870 875 880 Val Ser Pro Val Trp Cys Leu Asp Tyr Phe Asp Asn Leu He Ala Val 885 890 895 Gly Cys Ala Asn Gly Arg Val Glu Leu Trp Glu Ser Pro Ala Gly Leu 900 905 910 Leu Lys Cys Ala Tyr Gin Glu Asp Ala Lys Arg Asn Gin Gly He Thr 915 920 925 His He His Leu Asn Gly Asp Arg Val He Val Ala Arg Leu Asn Gly 930 935 940 Arg Leu Asp Phe Tyr Arg Leu Glu Thr Tyr Tyr Lys Gly Lys Gin He 945 950 955 960 Asp Trp Gly Phe Thr Ser Ala Tyr Arg Arg Thr His Val Arg Thr Gly 965 970 975 Ser Thr Gly Ser Leu Gly Leu Met Leu Gin Gin Gin Arg Cys Gin Gin 980 985 990 Glu Ala Ser Gin Lys Thr Thr Lys Glu Glu Met Lys He Thr Leu Glu 995 1000 1005 15 Gly Val Arg Leu Ala His Gin Gin Pro He Thr Cys Met Gin Val Val 1010 1015 1020 Asn Asp Met Val Phe Thr Gly Ser Gin Asp His Thr Leu Lys Val Tyr 1025 1030 1035 1040 Cys Leu Asn Lys Ser Asp Val Glu Tyr Thr Leu His Gly His Cys Gly 1045 1050 1055 Pro Val Thr Cys Leu Phe Val Asp Arg Trp Gin Pro Gly Thr Gly Gly 1060 1065 1070 Ser Gly Ser Gin Asp Gly Leu Leu Cys Val Trp Asp Leu Phe Thr Gly 1075 1080 1085 Ala Cys Met Tyr Asn He Gin Ala His Asp Gly Ala Val Ser Cys Leu 1090 1095 1100 Ala Cys Ala Pro Ser Tyr Val He Ser Leu Gly Thr Asp Glu Arg He 1105 1110 1115 1120 Cys Val Trp Glu Arg Phe Gin Gly Asn Leu Leu Thr Thr He Asn He 1125 1130 1135 Ser Asn Ala Tyr Ser Ser Leu Leu Met Leu Thr Pro Ser Leu Leu Val 1140 1145 1150 Thr Ser Lys Met Gly Lys Ala Ser Phe Leu He Ala Asn He Arg Gly 1155 1160 1165 Thr Val Asn Asn Lys Phe Asn Ser Asn Thr Gly Ser Leu He Val Trp 1170 1175 1180 Asp Val Arg Thr Gly Gin Pro Ala Arg Glu Val Lys Leu Asp Phe Ala 1185 1190 1195 1200 Asn Leu Gin Leu Cys Pro Lys He Met Met Leu Ala Cys Asp Ser Val 1205 1210 1215 Val Cys Asp Tyr Gly Asn Glu He Arg Val Val Arg Phe Pro He Val 1220 1225 1230 Ala Asp Lys Cys His 1235 <210> 7 16 <211> 3160 <212> DNA <213> Drosophila melanogaster <400> 7 gcacgagcac agacgaagcc tgttgaactt ttcgtaaaaa ttattccttt cgcaaagtta 60 aatgaatgtg tttactttct tatttataat aagcgcaatt tgcagcctcg acgcctttaa 120 aacagccgtt gttccaaatg agttcatcgt tcacttccat tcaaaatact ttgccccggt 180 ccgagaatcc tacatcgcag caaaacttct tggttcaaac gtaacgaact ggagaattgt 240 tccccgtcta aatttggctt ggcaatatcc aagtgatttt gatatcttac gagtttgcga 300 cggttatgaa tcatcatcag agtttattat agaaaggctt cagactcacc catcagtaaa 360 ggcagtagtt ccccagcgaa gcgtacgaag gatcctaaac tatgacgcct atagcaacct 420 aacgtatatt caccgccatc cccaaggagt gctaaggaac agaaacccaa acaacgatcg 480 ccaccgacaa ttgtgctccg tactccacgc caacatcctt tggaagctgg gtatcacagg 540 caagggagtt aaagtggcca ttttcgacac tggcctaacc . aaaaaccatc cacactttcg 600 aaatgtaaag gaacgaacaa actggacgaa tgaaaagtca cttgacgaca gagtcagtca 660 ' tggcaccttc gtcgccgggg taatcgcttc ttccagggaa tgcctaggct tcgctcccga 720 cgccgatctt. tacatattta aagtttttac gaactcccaa gtttcttaca cttcctggtt 780 cctggatgca ttcaactacg cgatatatag gaaaataaac attctcaacc ttagcattgg 840 gggtcccgac tttatggact cgccgttcgt tgaaaaggtg ttggaactgt cggctaataa 900 tgtcataatg atatcggcag caggaaatga tggtcccttg tacggcacgc taaacaatcc 960 tggcgatcag agcgatgtag ttggcgttgg tggcattcag tttgatgata aaatcgccaa 1020 gtttagttcg agaggaatga caacgtggga acttccctta ggctacggac gtatgggact 1080 cgatattgtc acgtacggaa gtcaagtgga aggcagtgat gtgcgcaagg ggtgcagacg 1140 actctctgga acatccgtgt cctctccagt tgttgcaggg gctgctgcac tgcttataag 1200 cggtgcattt cagaaaatcg actacataaa cccagcatct cttaagcagg tactcattga 1260 aggtgccgag aaactgccgc attataacat gtttgagcag ggagctggaa aactgaattt 1320 gctgaagagt atgcagctat tgctgtcata caaaccaaag ataaccctta ttccggcata 1380 ccttgacttc acccaaaact atatgtggcc ttatagctcc caacctctgt actatggaag 1440 ctccgtcgct attgcaaacg ttaccatact caatggtatc tctgtcacaa gtcatatagt 1500 tggcatccct aaatggattc ccgatttcga aaaccaaggt cagtttcttc aagtatctgc 1560 acaagtttcg cctatcgttt ggccgtggac cggttggatg tcagttttta ttgctgtaaa 1620 aaaggaagga gaaaactttg aaggtgtttg taaaggaagt atcaccctag ttttggaaag 1680 ctttaaacag accaccaacg aaactcatgt tacagaagtc gactttcctt taacaataaa 1740 ggttactcca aaaccgccaa gaaacaagag gattttatgg gatcagtacc acagcctaag 1800 gtatccaccg cgctatattc cacgagatga tctcaaagtt aaactagatc ctctggactg 1860 gagggcagac catatacaca caaactttag ggacatgtat acacatttac gaaatgttgg 1920 ctactacatt gatgttttgc gagaaccctt cacctgcttc aatgcctcgg attatggcgc 1980 gttattgatt gttgaccctg agagagggtt tggcgacgag gaaataaacg ctttacagga 2040 aaacgtgtat aaaagaggct tgaatgtcgt cgtattcgga gactggtata acaccactgt 2100 gatgaaaaaa attaaattct ttgacgagaa cacccgacaa tggtggacac ccgacactgg 2160 tggcgcaaat attccagcct tgaatgattt attgaagcca tttggaattg cttttggcga 2220 ttttgtcggt gagggacatt tcaaactggg cgaccattca atgtactatg ctagtggagc 2280 cacaattgtt aagtttccaa tgaatccagg agatattata gtgggcacaa aactgaatga 2340 ccaaggactt tcgattatta attctaaaac acccagcaag gtagcaaaac tagatgtacc 2400 tatttttggt atgttccaaa ccaaggcgaa cagtattcaa agcaacgagg aaatcgtggt 2460 caatgcggaa agcaatttgg cagaggctat acccacagat tactccacat ttaagaaccg 2520 ggttttgcta ctgcgaacga agcaacgaag tatcagtttt gcgaaaagca ataatcatga 2580 17 aactaagaat gaaggacgta ttgccgtata tggggactcc aactgcctcg actccacgca 2640 tctggagaag gcttgctact ggctgctaat aacgttttta gattttgcaa taaactcgca 2700 caaatcaagt ttattgcaga atctaaatcg tataactgaa tttcacaaat tagagagagc 2760 accattaccc cttaggatat cgcaaagtat tataaaatct cgttcacagg acaataattg 2820 tgaacaattt aagtggcttg caccgacgaa gcaaaataac gccgaggaaa ggaaatcttc 2880 tataatagac gtaaccatac tggaaaatga agaacacgag ataaatttaa tcaaaaattt 2940 attgggtgag gagatcgcaa aactagggca aaacaatgat tatttaacag gaatgcaatc 3000 cgcggatagt ctaatgactc caatatattc taattatnat aagcctaant gtatcatgta 3060 tttgtttatt ttaaagcgtc attcatttgt aataatactt cactttaaaa cgtaaaaaaa 3120 aaaaaactga ggggccgtac cattcgctaa ggagcgatct 3160 <210> 8 <211> 993 <212> PRT <213> Drosophila melanogaster <400> 8 Met Asn Val Phe Thr Phe Leu Phe He He Ser Ala He Cys Ser Leu 1 5 10 15 Asp Ala Phe Lys Thr Ala Val Val Pro Asn Glu Phe He Val His Phe 20 25 30 His Ser Lys Tyr Phe Ala Pro Val Arg Glu Ser Tyr He Ala Ala Lys 35 40 45 Leu Leu Gly Ser Asn Val Thr Asn Trp Arg He Val Pro Arg Leu Asn 50 55 60 Leu Ala Trp Gin Tyr Pro Ser Asp Phe Asp He Leu Arg Val Cys Asp 65 70 75 80 Gly Tyr Glu Ser Ser Ser Glu Phe He He Glu Arg Leu Gin Thr His 85 90 95 Pro Ser Val Lys Ala Val Val Pro Gin Arg Ser Val Arg Arg He Leu 100 105 110 Asn Tyr Asp Ala Tyr Ser Asn Leu Thr Tyr He His Arg His Pro Gin 115 120 125 Gly Val Leu Arg Asn Arg Asn Pro Asn Asn Asp Arg His Arg Gin Leu 130 135 140 Cys Ser Val Leu His Ala Asn He Leu Trp Lys Leu Gly He Thr Gly 145 150 155 160 18 Lys Gly Val Lys Val Ala He Phe Asp Thr Gly Leu Thr Lys Asn His 165 170 175 Pro His Phe Arg Asn Val Lys Glu Arg Thr Asn Trp Thr Asn Glu Lys 180 185 190 Ser Leu Asp Asp Arg Val Ser His Gly Thr Phe Val Ala Gly Val He 195 200 205 Ala Ser Ser Arg Glu Cys Leu Gly Phe Ala Pro Asp Ala Asp Leu Tyr 210 215 220 He Phe Lys Val Phe Thr Asn Ser Gin Val Ser Tyr Thr Ser Trp Phe 225 230 235 240 Leu Asp Ala Phe Asn Tyr Ala He Tyr Arg Lys He Asn He Leu Asn 245 250 255 Leu Ser He Gly Gly Pro Asp Phe Met Asp Ser Pro Phe Val Glu Lys 260 265 270 Val Leu Glu Leu Ser Ala Asn Asn Val He Met He Ser Ala Ala Gly 275 280 285 Asn Asp Gly Pro Leu Tyr Gly Thr Leu Asn Asn Pro Gly Asp Gin Ser 290 295 300 Asp Val Val Gly Val Gly Gly He Gin Phe Asp Asp Lys He Ala Lys 305 310 315 320 Phe Ser Ser Arg Gly Met Thr Thr Trp Glu Leu Pro Leu Gly Tyr Gly 325 330 335 Arg Met Gly Leu Asp He Val Thr Tyr Gly Ser Gin Val Glu Gly Ser 340 345 350 Asp Val Arg Lys Gly Cys Arg Arg Leu Ser Gly Thr Ser Val Ser Ser 355 360 365 Pro Val Val Ala Gly Ala Ala Ala Leu Leu He Ser Gly Ala Phe Gin 370 375 380 Lys He Asp Tyr He Asn Pro Ala Ser Leu Lys Gin Val Leu He Glu 385 390 395 400 Gly Ala Glu Lys Leu Pro His Tyr Asn Met Phe Glu Gin Gly Ala Gly 405 410 415 19 Lys Leu Asn Leu Leu Lys Ser Met Gin Leu Leu Leu Ser Tyr Lys Pro 420 425 430 Lys He Thr Leu He Pro Ala Tyr Leu Asp Phe Thr Gin Asn Tyr Met 435 440 445 Trp Pro Tyr Ser Ser Gin Pro Leu Tyr Tyr Gly Ser Ser Val Ala He 450 455 460 Ala Asn Val Thr He Leu Asn Gly He Ser Val Thr Ser His He Val 465 470 475 480 Gly He Pro Lys Trp He Pro Asp Phe Glu Asn Gin Gly Gin Phe Leu 485 490 495 Gin Val Ser Ala Gin Val Ser Pro He Val Trp Pro Trp Thr Gly Trp 500 505 510 Met Ser Val Phe He Ala Val Lys Lys Glu Gly Glu Asn Phe Glu Gly 515 520 525 Val Cys Lys Gly Ser He Thr Leu Val Leu Glu Ser Phe Lys Gin Thr 530 535 540 Thr Asn Glu Thr His Val Thr Glu Val Asp Phe Pro Leu Thr He Lys 545 550 555 560 Val Thr Pro Lys Pro Pro Arg Asn Lys Arg He Leu Trp Asp Gin Tyr 565 570 575 His Ser Leu Arg Tyr Pro Pro Arg Tyr He Pro Arg Asp Asp Leu Lys 580 585 590 Val Lys Leu Asp Pro Leu Asp Trp Arg Ala Asp His He His Thr Asn 595 600 605 Phe Arg Asp Met Tyr Thr His Leu Arg Asn Val Gly Tyr Tyr He Asp 610 615 620 Val Leu Arg Glu Pro Phe Thr Cys Phe Asn Ala Ser Asp Tyr Gly Ala 625 630 635 640 Leu Leu He Val Asp Pro Glu Arg Gly Phe Gly Asp Glu Glu He Asn 645 650 655 Ala Leu Gin Glu Asn Val Tyr Lys Arg Gly Leu Asn Val Val Val Phe 660 665 670 20 Gly Asp Trp Tyr Asn Thr Thr Val Met Lys Lys He Lys Phe Phe Asp 675 680 685 Glu Asn Thr Arg Gin Trp Trp Thr Pro Asp Thr Gly Gly Ala Asn He 690 695 700 Pro Ala Leu Asn Asp Leu Leu Lys Pro Phe Gly He Ala Phe Gly Asp 705 710 715 720 Phe Val Gly Glu Gly His Phe Lys Leu Gly Asp His Ser Met Tyr Tyr 725 730 735 Ala Ser Gly Ala Thr He Val Lys Phe Pro Met Asn Pro Gly Asp He 740 745 750 He Val Gly Thr Lys Leu Asn Asp Gin Gly Leu Ser He He Asn Ser 755 760 765 Lys Thr Pro Ser Lys Val Ala Lys Leu Asp Val Pro He Phe Gly Met 770 775 780 Phe Gin Thr Lys Ala Asn Ser He Gin Ser Asn Glu Glu He Val Val 785 790 795 800 Asn Ala Glu Ser Asn Leu Ala Glu Ala He Pro Thr Asp Tyr Ser Thr 805 810 815 Phe Lys Asn Arg Val Leu Leu Leu Arg Thr Lys Gin Arg Ser He Ser 820 825 830 Phe Ala Lys Ser Asn Asn His Glu Thr Lys Asn Glu Gly Arg He Ala 835 840 845 Val Tyr Gly Asp Ser Asn Cys Leu Asp Ser Thr His Leu Glu Lys Ala 850 855 860 Cys Tyr Trp Leu Leu He Thr Phe Leu Asp Phe Ala He Asn Ser His 865 870 875 880 Lys Ser Ser Leu Leu Gin Asn Leu Asn Arg He Thr Glu Phe His Lys 885 890 895 Leu Glu Arg Ala Pro Leu Pro Leu Arg He Ser Gin Ser He He Lys 900 905 910 Ser Arg Ser Gin Asp Asn Asn Cys Glu Gin Phe Lys Trp Leu Ala Pro 915 920 925 21 Thr Lys Gin Asn Asn Ala Glu Glu Arg Lys Ser Ser He He Asp Val 930 935 940 Thr He Leu Glu Asn Glu Glu His Glu He Asn Leu He Lys Asn Leu 945 950 955 960 Leu Gly Glu Glu He Ala Lys Leu Gly Gin Asn Asn Asp Tyr Leu Thr 965 970 975 Gly Met Gin Ser Ala Asp Ser Leu Met Thr Pro He Tyr Ser Asn Tyr 980 985 990 Xaa 22

Inventors: COSTA MICHAEL A, DOBERSTEIN STEPHEN KOHL, EBENS ALLEN JAMES JR, ELSON SARAH, FERGUSON KIMBERLY CARR, HOMBURGER SHEILA AKIKO, KEEGAN KEVIN PATRICK, STOUT THOMAS J, COSTA, MICHAEL, A., DOBERSTEIN, STEPHEN, KOHL, EBENS, ALLEN, JAMES, JR., ELSON, SARAH, FERGUSON, KIMBERLY, CARR, HOMBURGER, SHEILA, AKIKO, KEEGAN, KEVIN, PATRICK, STOUT, THOMAS, J.
Applicants: COSTA MICHAEL A, DOBERSTEIN STEPHEN KOHL, EBENS ALLEN JAMES JR, ELSON SARAH, EXELIXIS INC, FERGUSON KIMBERLY CARR, HOMBURGER SHEILA AKIKO, KEEGAN KEVIN PATRICK, STOUT THOMAS J, COSTA, MICHAEL, A., DOBERSTEIN, STEPHEN, KOHL, EBENS, ALLEN, JAMES, JR., ELSON, SARAH, EXELIXIS, INC., FERGUSON, KIMBERLY, CARR, HOMBURGER, SHEILA, AKIKO, KEEGAN, KEVIN, PATRICK, STOUT, THOMAS, J.
Application year: 2000
Main classification: A01K67
IPC codes: A01K67, C07K14, C07K19, C12N1, C12N5, C12N15, C12P21, G01N33