METHODS OF CONCENTRATING MICROORGANISMS USING AFFINITY SEPARATION

Abstract: A method for concentrating a particular microorganism or microorganisms of interest in a sample is provided and effected by contacting the sample with a matrix to which is bound an affinity receptor specific for the particular microorganism or microorganisms, the affinity receptor and the matrix being selected so as to allow capture of the microorganism or microorganisms to the matrix via the affinity receptor when present in the sample at a concentration of ultra low levels, thereby obviating the need for a prolonged pre-enrichment step, and in some cases obviating altogether the need for a pre-enrichment step, of the microorganism or microorganisms in the sample.

Description: METHODS OF CONCENTRATING MICROORGANISMS USING AFFINITY SEPARATION FIELD AND B ACKGROI JND OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to methods for the capture and concentration of microorganism or microorganisms using affinity separation for the specific concentration and detection of a particular microorganism or microorganisms present in samples at ultra low levels from samples of large or small volumes. Advantageously, the methods are useful to concentrate and/or detect microorganisms present in samples at ultra low levels. In a preferred embodiment cellulose binding domain- or protein-receptor conjugates are employed to affinity bind a particular microorganism or microorganisms to a cellulosic or chitin matrix. Citation or identification of any reference in this application shall not be construed as an admission that such reference is available as prior art to the present invention. There is a tremendous effort being made to develop rapid microbial testing to meet the needs of the food, medical, veterinary and environmental industries. The food industry, for example, needs rapid microbial testing to approve or reject raw, semi-processed or processed materials and determine whether or not to release a held batch of product. Furthermore, with the increasing implementation of hazard analysis and critical control point programs by the food industry, the demand for rapid microbial testing has been steadily on the rise (Rules and Regulations, Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service, "Pathogen Reduction; Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems" (1996) 61 Federal Register 38806). Rapid microbiological methods such as nucleic acid probe hybridization and immunological assays have advanced dramatically, shortening the time required for the detection of pathogens in meats and other foods. However, these methods most often require concentrations of target microorganism of 10^ to 10° " cells per ml or more (Blackburn et al., 1994, Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 19:32-36; Swaminathan et al., 1994, Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 48:401-426; and Tian et al., 1996, J. Food Prot. 59: 1158- 1163). Foods which are contaminated by bacterial pathogens usually have low numbers of bacteria so that an enrichment step is required prior to the application of a rapid detection assay or even a selective culture method. PCR-based assays have the potential to overcome the need for long selective enrichment steps due to their ability to detect and identify pathogens in the presence of large numbers of background flora (K. Nenkateswaran et al., 1997, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4127-4131). Nevertheless, when target pathogen concentrations are low, i.e., less than 10- colony forming units per gram (CFU/g), current PCR procedures require 6 to 18 hours of enrichment prior to PCR amplification in order to detect such target pathogens. This enrichment step not only brings the target pathogen, which may be present at levels of less than 1 cell per ml or gram of food (Swaminathan et al., 1994, Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 48:401-426), to PCR detectable levels, but also allows for samples to be diluted or filtered to reduce or partially remove PCR inhibitory food components while bringing the target pathogen to a concentration which is detectable (K. Venkateswaran et al., 1997, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4127-4131). The possibility of selectively concentrating target bacteria from a food sample, other than by culture methods, while removing background flora would have a tremendous impact on rapid food testing saving time and increasing sensitivities of existing detection techniques. In culture methods, selective reagents are necessary in order to inhibit the growth of competing microorganisms but they also partially inhibit target bacteria, ultimately increasing the time it requires to achieve detectable levels of the target pathogen. Furthermore, selection media inhibit the "resuscitation" (reviving the viability) of damaged bacteria present, e.g., in meat samples, due to freeze thaw cycles, inhibitory food components, or desiccation during processing. Similarly, consecutive enrichment steps are needed in order to dilute compounds present in many foods which are inhibitory to the target bacteria and in some cases the target bacteria do not revive or revive very slowly. Zero tolerance standards require the detection of these damaged pathogens even when they are present at minute levels. Selective concentration of target bacteria would enable rapid enrichment to be carried out without the addition of selective reagents which are necessary in order to inhibit the growth of background flora, but which also partially inhibit target bacteria and also eliminate the need for successive enrichment steps needed to dilute inhibitory compounds both of which ultimately increase the time it takes, to achieve detectable levels of target pathogen. Inhibition or removal of competing microorganisms and inhibitory compounds found in food samples is highly desirable and some times necessary before efficient resuscitation of the target pathogens can be successfully effected. In summary, efficient methods for selective concentration of a particular pathogen(s) from foods would not only shorten the overall time required for detection of these pathogens, but would allow for more sensitive detection due to more efficient resuscitation of damaged bacteria. Furthermore, the ability to collect larger more representative samples while selectively concentrating a specific pathogen from these samples would greatly increase the probability of detecting a pathogen in foods when they are present at extremely low concentrations. Solid Phase Immunoassays: The need to develop rapid on-line microbial testing protocols emphasizes the need to develop methods, other than those requiring time consuming incubation steps, to enrich target bacteria by noncultural concentration of the microorganisms from a food sample being tested. Solid-phase immunoassays have found increasing application in diagnostic microbiology due to their high specificity. The specificity of an immunoassay is determined by the antibody or antigen which has been immobilized onto a solid support and by the specificity of the support itself. The specificity of an immunoassay, carried out on a solid support, is enhanced by the ability to remove, after completion of the immunocapture step, unwanted material from the antigen antibody immune complex. This wash step will be facilitated if the solid support itself possesses a 'non- sticky' surface, i.e., microfiora and other substances found in a sample are not bound to solid support in a non-specific manner. Many substances have been used as solid supports for immobilization of antibody or antigen including nitrocellulose, nylon, and agarose beads. The success of an immunoassay in detecting the presence of a particular microorganism(s) in a sample depends upon the presence of the microorganism above a critical concentration. This concentration is dictated by the sensitivity of the immunoassay which will be used to determine if the microorganism is present in the sample. In most cases, immunoassays require culturing of the sample prior to performing the assay, which culturing functions to dramatically increase the total number of the microorganisms present in the sample. Most often a selective enrichment step is used to culture the target organism where compounds, for example, antibiotics, which inhibit background flora, or a particular nutritional requirement (or the absence of), are included/excluded in a medium, for optimizing the growth of the target organism. Other methods, such as manipulation of physical conditions of the medium i.e., elevated temperature of the growth media, may also be used as means for selection. In all of these cases, the goal is to give a relative advantage to the target organism as compared to background flora. Often the inhibitory compounds or conditions have an inhibitory effect, though to a lesser degree, on the target organism itself, especially when these are injured and need to be resuscitated prior to rapid cell multiplication. U.S. Patent No. 5,415,997 describes a method for the detection of a particular microorganism in a mixed population which overcomes the need for selective media by using an immunoimmobilization technique followed by non-selective growth and immunoassay, or release of the microorganism by cleavage of the antibody-microorganism bond and subsequent growth on non-selective media. The success of this immunoassay in detecting the presence of a particular microorganisms is dependent on the pre-enrichment step which allows the target microorganism to reach the critical concentration which will ensure that some of these organisms will be captured by the immobilized antibodies. Although effective in removing the need for selective enrichment media, this technique requires for success a critical concentration as dictated by the sensitivity of standard ELISA immunoassay of approximately 10- CFU/ml of a target microorganism, e.g., Salmonella typhimurium. Classic methods of concentrating microorganisms: The United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service ("USDA-FSIS") has developed a series of both presumptive and confirmatory tests for detection of Escherichia coli (E. coli), strain 0157:H7. The presumptive test involves culturing 25 grams of homogenized food samples in enrichment medium and plating on specialized agar plates of Sorbitol MacConkey ("SMAC"). In using this technique the speed of the assay is sacrificed in order to achieve high sensitivity and definitive identification, rendering such testing schemes as impractical for large-scale routine food industry testing programs. The USDA assay is, as pointed out, slow but is regarded as definitive due to its extreme sensitivity level of less than or equal to 3 CFU/g of food (Sharar et al., 1995, United States Dept. of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service: Protocol for isolation and identification of Escherichia coli 0157:H7. Revision 4 of Laboratory Communication # 38. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.). Such an extremely high sensitivity is necessary to detect the extraordinary low infectious dose of E. coli 0157:H7 thought to initiate disease (Szabo et al., 1990, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:3546-3549). Immuno Magnetic Separation: Sensitivity of enrichment techniques can be enhanced by the use of Immuno Magnetic Separation ("IMS") of E. coli 0157:H7 prior to subculture (Chapman et al., 1993, Net. Rec. 133:171-172 and Wright et al., 1994, Epidemiol. Infect. 113:31-39). Inclusion of an IMS step in the pre- enrichment step followed by isolating the microorganism by subculturing on Sorbitol MacConkey Agar ("SMAC"), increased the sensitivity 100 fold from 2000 CFU/lOg beef to a detection limit of 20 CFU/lOg beef after the sample had been enriched for several hours (Wright, et al., 1994, Epidemiol. Infect. 113:31-39). In bovine fecal samples which were artificially inoculated with 10- , 102 , 10 , 1 and 0.1 E. coli 0157:H7 organisms per ml, IMS did not increase sensitivity of detection compared to direct culture and enrichment/subculture in two out of twelve E. coli 0157 strains which were tested after six hours pre-enrichment, IMS, and then finally plating on SMAC supplemented with 0.05 mg/L Cefixime and 2.5 mg/L Potassium tellurite ("CT-SMAC") plates with additional 18 hour incubation at 37 °C (Chapman et al., 1997, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:2549-2553). In fact, in one of these two samples, even at the highest level of inoculation i.e., 10^ CFU/ml, detection was not possible at all with the IMS technique. In the remaining 10 E. coli 0157 strains, IMS improved detection such that fecal suspension samples which were inoculated with between 10- CFU/ml and 1 CFU/ml were shown to be positive for E. coli 0157:H7. However, it is critical to emphasize that the positive results which were achieved by IMS were made possible only after 6 hours of pre- enrichment in selective enrichment culture media. During this 6 hour pre- enrichment step it can be assumed that the concentration of E. coli 0157:H7 increased by two to three orders of magnitude to a final concentration of E. coli 0157:H7 of greater than 10-* CFU/ml even at the lowest detectable inoculum level, 1 CFU/ml. Standard protocols for IMS have demonstrated that between 11 % and 41 % of E. coli 0157 cells can be isolated from 1 ml of a 6 hour pre- enrichment medium in which the concentration of presumptive positive in these cultures was between 4.4 x 10^ and 4.8 x 10^ CFU/ml (Tomoyasu, 1998, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:376-382). The percent capture by IMS of Salmonella bacteria cells present at low concentrations in growth media is approximately 10 % (Hanai, et al., 1997, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:775-778). Furthermore, capture and detection by IMS of Salmonella bacteria is possible only when the concentration of bacteria present in sample is at least 10^ CFU/ml. Similar results are seen with E. coli 0157 in which another application of IMS has been used in Immunomagnetic- Electrochemiluminescent (IM-ECL) detection of E. coli 0157:H7 in foods and environmental water samples to perform rapid detection of this bacteria with a sensitivity of approximately 1000 CFU/ml in the various food and environmental matrices which were tested (Yu and Bruno, 1996 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:587-592). The IM-ECL assay, however, is inhibited by milk. This inhibition effect was observed with whole, nonfat and low-fat (2 %) milk samples in which IM capture is apparently impeded by the entrapment of magnetic beads and bacteria in lumps of lipid or casein. Other Concentration Techniques: Hydroxyapatite ("HA") has been used to concentrate bacteria from foods and bovine feces because of its ability to adhere to whole bacterial cells (Berry et al., 1997, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4069-4074). However, this technique works poorly when the pathogen is present at concentrations less than lO^-lO^ CFU/ml and when inhibitory substances such as those which are found in feces are present. Furthermore, HA has a limited concentration effect with certain pathogens such as, for example, E. coli 0157:H7 even when this pathogen is present at high concentrations. In another method, antibody-coated cellulose sponges have been used to enhance the isolation of Salmonella from 10-fold pre-enriched samples obtained from contaminated pig, poultry, and cattle farms, poultry hatcheries, animal feed mills, and processed animal proteins (Davies and Wray, 1997, Letts, in Appl. Microbiol. 25:246-248). The use of polyvalent "O" antiserum enhanced the specificity of the Salmonella captured. However, this method has the drawback of requiring an 18 hour pre- enrichment step followed by growth of the captured bacteria on an Rappaport medium (MSRV) plate for an additional 18-24 hours. This cellulose sponge method does not provide a rapid method of concentration and detection required by the food processing industry and requires a pre- enrichment step. The inclusion of a longer enrichment step or a secondary enrichment step in conventional methods of concentrating bacteria will increase the concentration per ml of a particular type of bacteria and, therefore, the overall sensitivity of a test being used to determine the presence of a bacteria in a sample. However, the longer incubation periods will significantly add to the time and resources needed to perform the test. Highly specific capture coupled with concentration of relatively large sample volumes is the ideal solution for highly sensitive, specific as well as rapid testing of food, in particular milk samples, for example, and biological, clinical and environmental samples. Cellulose: Chemically modified cellulose has been very useful for immobilization of proteins such as endo-beta-glucosidase, an enzyme that is used for wine and fruit juice treatments (Shoseyov et al., 1990, J. Agric. Food Chem. 38:1387-1390). However, immobilization requires the chemical modification of the cellulose which has detrimental effects on the matrix, making flow qualities unsuitable for industrial work and resulting in a fluffy compressible material that is not suitable for applications involving packed columns. Objects of the Invention: A rapid, highly sensitive method of concentrating and detecting microorganisms in a sample is needed in the art. Such a method of concentrating microorganisms would be useful for detecting very low numbers of microorganisms in large volumes of dilute samples, encountered especially in the food, environmental, veterinary and medical industries. Such method would be particularly useful for detecting microorganisms in samples containing ultra low levels of microorganisms in samples, for example, in samples with as few as 0.00025, 0.001, 0.008 or <1 CFU/ml and up to about 10 3 CFU/ml. One of the objects of the present invention is to provide advantageously useful methods of concentrating or concentrating and detecting particular microorganisms in samples. Another object of the present invention is to provide a cellulose substrate that is not chemically modified and that can be used as a highly suitable matrix for immobilization of microorganisms by means of attaching a CBP- or CBD-receptor conjugate to the cellulose substrate. The cellulose possesses the advantage that the resulting solid matrix is natural, inert and non-toxic (having required no "chemical modifications"). It is further advantageous because the resulting solid matrix retains its physical properties, and has a low non-specific affinity for most proteins. Hence it is a "non-sticky" matrix and microorganisms that are not "target" microorganisms are not non-specifically bound. Further, it is relatively low priced. At present, cellulose prices are 100-500 fold lower than those of, for example, glutathione-Sepharose and IPTG-Sepharose, making cellulose an attractive, inexpensive matrix that can be used safely in food and pharmaceutical industries. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides methods for concentrating a particular microorganism or microorganisms of interest in a sample. In addition, the present invention provides a prefϊltration method and device, which are advantageously used in combination with the concentration methods of the present invention, as further detailed hereinunder. According to one aspect a method according to the present invention for concentrating a particular microorganism or microorganisms of interest in a sample is effected by contacting the sample with a matrix to which is bound an affinity receptor specific for the particular microorganism or microorganisms, the affinity receptor and the matrix being selected so as to allow capture of the microorganism or microorganisms to the matrix via the affinity receptor when present in the sample at a concentration of ultra low levels, thereby obviating the need for a prolonged pre-enrichment step of the microorganism or microorganisms in the sample. As used herein, the term "ultra low level" means a sample having a low concentration of microorganisms of interest, i.e., with at least 0.00025, 0.001, 0.008 or <1 CFU/ml and up to about 10 3 CFU/ml of the microorganisms. The methods can also include a washing step to remove unbound material of the sample from the matrix. The methods can also include a step for enriching the concentrated microorganism(s) in situ by addition of a culture medium to the matrix or by enriching the concentrated microorganism(s) in vitro by transferring the microorganism(s) from the matrix to a culture medium. The method can also include a step of performing an assay to detect any microorganisms that bind to the matrix. According to further features in preferred embodiments of the invention described below, the matrix is selected from the group consisting of natural and synthetic matrices. According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the matrix is a polysaccharide matrix. According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the polysaccharide matrix is selected from the group consisting of a cellulosic matrix, an agarose matrix, a chitin matrix, a starch matrix and a matrix of cellulose, agarose, chitin and starch derivatives. According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the matrix is a coated matrix. According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the matrix is a synthetic matrix selected from the group consisting of a polypropylene matrix, polyester matrix, a polyamide matrix, a polyethylene matrix, an acrylamide matrix, a methacrylate matrix, a sepharose matrix, a polystyrene matrix and matrices which are derivatives of the above matrices. According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the matrix is in a form selected from the group consisting of beads, threads, a cloth, a woven material, a non-woven material, a membrane, a powder, a foam and a sponge. According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the matrix is selected from the group consisting of a porous matrix and a non-porous matrix. According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the affinity receptor is directly bound to said matrix via covalent or non-covalent interactions. According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the affinity receptor forms a part of a conjugate or fusion including a counterpart moiety having affinity to the matrix. According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the counterpart moiety is a matrix binding peptide. According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the matrix binding peptide is a polysaccharide binding protein or domain. According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the polysaccharide binding protein or domain is a cellulose binding protein or domain or a maltose binding protein. According to preferred embodiments the methods of the present invention are effected by incubating a solid sample with a liquid to form an extract, and contacting the extract with a cellulosic or chitin matrix to which is bound a cellulose binding protein (CBP) - or domain (CBD) - receptor conjugate specific for the microorganism. In a preferred embodiment, the sample is a sample having ultra low level(s) - of microorganism(s) . According to additional preferred embodiments the methods of the present invention are effected by contacting a sample with a cellulosic or chitin matrix to which is bound a cellulose binding protein (CBP)- or cellulose binding domain (CBD) receptor conjugate specific for the microorganism(s) and enriching a concentrated microorganism(s) by addition of a culture medium with or without antibiotics to the matrix. This embodiment may further comprise performing an assay to detect any microorganisms that bind to the CBP- or CBD-receptor conjugate bound to the matrix. In a preferred embodiment, the sample is a sample having ultra low level(s) of microorganism(s). Capture using affinity receptor concentration methods is a user friendly technique for microbial detection with a sensitivity level of at least 0.00025 CFU/ml food, biological, and environmental samples. In other embodiments, the sensitivity level is at least 0.001 CFU/ml at least 0.008 CFU/ml or <1 CFU/ml. The invention has utility in concentrating microorganisms in samples, particularly dilute samples, in order to detect the microorganisms by any means known in the art. Such methods of concentration provide improved means of concentrating microorganisms in food, environmental, or biological, such as medical or veterinary, samples. The present invention has a number of advantages over previously described concentration methods. For example, the use of cellulosic fabric as a matrix, as well as other matrices, allow for larger volumes of liquids (up to 10 liters) to be passed with relatively high flow rates as compared to DYNAL® DYNALBEADS ® procedure, which is limited to very small volume samples, i.e., about 1 ml. The low non-specific binding of the matrix achieves very low background levels. In certain preferred embodiments, the present invention is able to capture microorganisms present at very low concentrations by use of high surface area cellulosic or chitin matrix, such as, but not limited to gauze. The present invention is also able to bind, without any modifications of the matrix, antibodies specifically resulting in a highly specific capture/concentration device. Furthermore, the present invention provides for the ability to selectively capture microorganisms and then enrich in situ the captured microorganisms on the matrix without hindering the ability of the microorganisms to replicate and, in fact, enhancing the growth of the microorganism. The physical properties of the matrix employed according to the present invention enable its performance under conditions that Immuno Magnetic Separation (IMS) perform poorly, i.e., in the presence of food samples containing milk and food samples containing bacteria at concentrations lower than 10-* CFU/ml. According to preferred embodiments of the present invention the concentration methods are further effected by a prefiltration step which is designed for the removal of debris in a form selected from the group consisting of particulates, fatty materials, starchy materials and proteinaceous materials from the sample. Such removal is of greater importance when (i) larger volumes of samples need to be processed; (ii) low levels of the particular microorganism or microorganisms are present in the sample; (iii) inhibitory compounds are present in the sample; and (iv) the level of particulate matter present in the sample inhibits the ability to process the sample. Measures are taken to ensure substantially no removal of the particular microorganism or microorganisms upon prefiltration. Any suitable filtering device with one or more filtering layers of selected properties can be employed to implement the prefiltration step according to the present invention, depending on the sample processed. A presently preferred filtering device in accordance to the teachings of the present invention, which is designed to perform the above prefiltration task, comprises (a) a housing defining a space having an inlet and an outlet forming a filtration path therein; (b) a first filter layer including a cotton filter being within the housing in the filtration path; (c) a second filter layer including a polyester filter being within the housing in the filtration path; and (d) a third filter layer including a polypropylene filter being within the housing in the filtration path. According to another embodiment the filtering device comprises a housing defining a space having an inlet and an outlet forming a filtration path therein; (b) a first filter layer including a polyurethane filter being within the housing in the filtration path; (c) a second filter layer including a non-woven filter being within the housing in the filtration path; and (d) a third filter layer including a polypropylene filter being within the housing in the filtration path. Preferably it further comprises (e) a fourth filter layer including a hollow body of woven mesh being within the housing in the filtration path. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The invention herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein: Figure 1 is an illustrative diagram of one mode of operation of a method of the present invention using an immunoconcentrator ("IC"), such as cellulose binding domain immunoconcentrator ("CBD-IC") which contains am appropriate matrix, such as cellulosic or chitin matrix to which is bound a microorganism affinity receptor, such as a CBP- or CBD microorganism affinity receptor conjugate. Figure 2 is an illustrative diagram of an automated mode of operation of a method of the present invention using an IC. Figure 3 is a photograph of a denaturing SDS-PAGE gel showing the binding of the N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridydithio)propionate) ("SPDP") CBD-goat IgG conjugate to AVICELL™. Lane 1, protein markers (10 - 225 Kd); lane 2, CBD-conjugate loaded (conjugate solution before binding to cellulose); lane 3, unbound conjugate (supernatant solution from wash step solutions); and lane 4, bound conjugate (proteins which were bound to the cellulose). H and L signify the Heavy and Light peptide chains of the IgG. Figure 4 is a graph showing the bifunctional activity of the CBD- anti-E. coli 0157:H7 conjugate. CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7 was bound to cellulose beads in phosphate buffered saline with 0.05 % TWEEN™ 20 ("PBS-TWEEN™ 20"). E. coli 0157:H7 antigen was added (0.5 ml at 10 3 , 104, or 10^ CFU/ml), incubated for 15 minutes and washed with PBS- TWEEN™ 20. Anti-E. coli 0157:H7-HRP (horse radish peroxidase) was added, incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature, and washed with PBS-TWEEN 20. 0.2 ml K-Blue™ substrate was added and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. The substrate was transferred into a fresh 10 tube and 0.2 ml 1M H2SO4 was added. The absorbance of the sample were read using a spectrophotometer at 450 nm. Figures 5 a and 5b are photographs of denaturing SDS - polyacrylamide gels, 15 % and 7.5 %, respectively, showing the difference in specific binding of native goat IgG (lanes 1-3) compared to the CBD-IgG conjugate (lanes 4-6). Figure 5a (15 % SDS-PAGE) and Figure 5b (7.5 % SDS-PAGE); Lane 1, IgG alone; Lane 2, supernatant of unbound proteins; Lane 3, IgG that bound to cellulose; Lane 4, molecular weight markers; Lane 5, CBD-goat IgG; Lane 6, supernatant having unbound conjugate; Lane 7, conjugate that bound to cellulose; Lane 8, molecular weight markers. Figure 6 is a graph depicting the capture of bacteria. PBS solution containing 2480 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 was drawn into and expelled from a CBD-IC device using a standard pipettor. Capture of bacteria by a single cycle is compared to 5 cycles. Control was the device without CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7 in which bacteria were cycled 5 times through the device. Devices were washed once with 5 ml PBS after the capture step. Figure 7 is a graph depicting the selective capture of Salmonella typhimurium from a 1 ml sample having 129 CFU. The control was a cellulose containing device with no CBD-anti-Sα/mone//α conjugate (control, left bar) and the test device contained cellulose bound CBD-anti- Salmonella IgG conjugate (CBD-aiiύ-Salmonella, right bar). Figure 8 is a graph showing a comparison of the immunoconcentration of E. coli 0157:H7. PBS solution containing 590, 76 or 6 CFU of E. coli 0157:H7 was cycled twice through a device containing a CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7 conjugate bound to cellulose using a standard pipettor. The Control was the device without the bound CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7. The devices were washed once with 5 ml of PBS after the capture step. Figure 9 is a graph showing the effect of different wash solutions on the capture of E. coli 0157:H7. Capture of 1770 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 is shown when 5 ml saline, PBS or PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20 was used for the wash step. The results show that all wash solutions produced a high percent of capture when the CBD-IgG conjugates were used, but much less without the conjugates. The specificity of the matrix is demonstrated by the controls in which a device without CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7 was used. Figure 10 is a graph showing the detection of E. coli 0157:H7 from 1 ml of PBS by ΕLISA after capture by a device with a CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7 IgG conjugate and in situ enrichment. PBS solution containing 22 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 was cycled once through a device using standard pipettor. Devices were washed once with 5 ml PBS-TWEEN™ 20 and 5 ml PBS after the capture step. Captured bacteria were enriched in situ for 4 or 5 hours after the wash step and then analyzed by ELISA. The optical density was converted into CFU/ml using a standard curve. Figure 11 is a graph showing detection of E. coli 0157:H7 from ground beef samples by ELISA after CBD-IC immunoconcentration and in situ enrichment. 225 ml PBS buffer was added to 25 grams of ground beef samples which were previously spiked with 44 CFU E. coli 0157:H7. Samples were stomached in stomacher classic 400 unit (IUL USA Inc. Erlanger Kentucky) at 1500 rpm for 2 minutes and filtered before being passed through a CBD-IC device. Unspiked samples were used for the control. Captured bacteria were enriched in situ after the wash step for 4 or 5 hours and then analyzed by ELISA. The optical density was converted into CFU/ml based on a standard curve. Figure 12 is a graph depicting the detection of E. coli 0157:H7 in 250 ml of meat extract inoculated with 20 or 200 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 and captured by the CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7-IC gauze device (using gauze as the cellulosic matrix) followed by in situ enrichment and detection by ΕLISA. Figure 13 is a graph showing a comparison of the detection of E. coli 0157:H7 in 1 ml of meat extract inoculated with 40 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 and loaded on the CBD-anti-E. coli IC gauze device by consecutive cycles or incubated with DYNAL® DYNABΕADS®-anti-E. coli 0157 followed by 6 hours in situ enrichment and detection by ELISA. Control trials were performed using samples without 0157 :H7 inoculum. Figure 14 is a graph showing a comparison between CBD-IC and DYNAL® DYNABEADS® methods for the capture of E. coli 0157:H7 from samples of fresh milk containing 1%, 2% or 3% fat. Figure 15 is a graph showing the capture of E. coli 0157:H7 in a sample of ultra-high temperature ("UHT") long-life homogenized milk containing 1 % fat. 250 ml samples were spiked with 5 CFU or 60 CFU of E. coli 0157:H7, passed through CBD-IC followed by in situ enrichment for 5 hours, and analyzed by ELISA. For the control, unspiked samples were used. Figure 16 is a graph showing a comparison of the capture of E. coli 0157:H7 in a sample of fresh homogenized milk containing 3 % fat. 250 ml samples were spiked with 30 CFU E. coli 0157:H7, passed through a CBD-IC, followed by in situ enrichment for 5 hours and ELISA analysis. For the control, unspiked samples were used. Figure 17 is a graph showing the results of the capture of E. coli 0157:H7 from ground beef extract samples. Extracts were obtained from 25 grams of ground beef that were spiked with 2 CFU or 7 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 and then pre-enriched in modified EC medium ("mEC") (Difco) without Novobiocin. The samples were then passed through CBD-IC followed by in situ enrichment for 5 hours and analyzed by ELISA. For the control, unspiked samples were used. Figure 18 is a graph showing the results of the capture of E. coli 0157:H7 from PBS by a maltose binding protein (MBP)-antibody- immunoconcetrator (IC) containing an α-amylose coated matrix. MBP-Ab- IC cartridges were used in triplicates to capture viable E. coli 0157:H7 cells from a 1 ml PBS solution containing 100 CFU's. After capture and wash steps the wash solutions were combined and bacterial concentration was determined by a filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ on mENDO agar LES medium and overnight incubation at 37 °C. Cartridges containing MBP without conjugated antibody (Ab) served as control. Figure 19 is a graph showing the results of the capture of E. coli 0157:H7 from PBS by a maltose binding protein (MBP)-antibody- immunoconcetrator (IC) containing an α-amylose coated matrix. MBP-Ab- IC cartridges were used in duplicates to capture viable E. coli 0157:H7 cells from 250 ml PBS solution containing 100 CFU's. After capture and wash steps the wash solutions were combined and bacterial concentration was determined by a filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ on mENDO agar LES medium and overnight incubation at 37 °C. Cartridges without MBP-Ab antibody served as control. Figure 20 is a graph showing the results of the capture of E. coli 0157:H7 from 25 ml PBS by a CBD-antibody cellulose beads complex. CBD-IC beads cartridge was used to capture viable E. coli 0157:H7 from 25 ml PBS solution containing 52 CFU (for ORBICELL™) or 110 CFU (for VISKASE®). After capture and wash steps the wash solutions were combined and bacterial concentration was determined by filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ on mENDO agar LES medium and overnight incubation at 37 °C. Beads, after wash step, were collected with 1 ml PBS and plated onto mENDO agar LES. In previous experiments control ORBICELL™ beads (without CBD-Ab) were shown to have no capture effect on viable E. coli 0157:H7. Figure 21 is a graph showing the results of the capture of S. typhimurium from 250 ml meat extract by a CBD-antibody demonstrating the sensitivity of CBD-IC without a pre-enrichment step. Samples of 250 ml stomached meat extract were spiked with 200, 100, 50, 15 or zero CFU S. typhimurium and then passed through a CBD-IC anti-Salmonella device. Captured Salmonella were then enriched at 37 °C for six hours with 120 μl of M-Broth without Novobiocin. Samples were then analyzed by ELISA using monoclonal anti-S. typhimurium. All experiments were performed in duplicates. Numbers in parenthesis beneath the bar indicate number of positive samples. Figure 22 is a graph showing the results of the capture of S. typhimurium from 250 ml meat extract by a CBD-antibody following a brief pre-enrichment in a non-selective medium, demonstrating the sensitivity of CBD-IC for S. typhimurium. Samples of 250 ml stomacher meat extract were spiked with 28, 14, 7 or zero CFU S. typhimurium, pre-enriched for 1 hour at 37 °C using Buffered Peptone Water and then passed through CBD- IC anti-Salmonella device. Captured Salmonella cells were enriched at 37 ° C for 7 hours with 120 μl of M-Broth without Novobiocin. Samples were then analyzed by ELISA using monoclonal anti S. typhimurium. Fraction in parentheses represents number of positives out of number of trials. Figure 23 a is a graph showing the results of capture of E. coli 0157:H7 onto a polyester matrix. One ml PBS solution containing 91 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 was cycled 5 times through an immunoconcentrator device using a standard pipettor. Following capture, devices were washed twice with 5 ml PBS. Captured bacteria were calculated by subtracting the number of expelled bacteria from the inoculum. Figure 23b is a graph showing the results of capture of E. coli 0157:H7 onto a polyester matrix and subsequent enrichment. One ml PBS solution containing 91 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 was cycled 5 times through an immunoconcentrator device using a standard pipettor. Following capture, devices were washed twice with 5 ml PBS. Captured bacteria were then enriched in situ for 5.5 hours and were analyzed by ELISA. Figure 24 is a graph showing the results of capture of E. coli 0157:H7 onto a polyester matrix and subsequent enrichment. One ml PBS solution containing 113 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 was cycled 5 times through an immunoconcentrator device using a standard pipettor. Following capture, devices were washed twice with 5 ml PBS. Captured bacteria were then enriched in situ for 5 hours and were analyzed by ELISA. Figure 25 is a graph showing the results of capture of E. coli 0157:H7 onto a polyester matrix and subsequent enrichment. 250 ml Buffered Peptone Water solution containing 91 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 was passed through an immunoconcentrator device. Following capture, devices were washed twice with 5 ml PBS. Captured bacteria were calculated by subtracting the number of bacteria that were not captured from the input. Captured bacteria amplified in-situ after wash step were analyzed by ΕLISA. Figure 26 is a graph showing the results of capture of E. coli 0157:H7 onto a polyester matrix and subsequent enrichment. 25 grams ground beef stomached in 225 ml Buffered Peptone Water solution was spiked with 136 or 0 CFU E. coli 0157:H7, filtered through a SPUNTΕCH ™ filter and passed through an immunoconcentrator containing IgG- polyester matrix. Following capture, devices were washed twice with 5 ml PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20 and then captured bacteria were enriched using 150 μl mΕC media for 5 hours at 37 °C and were analyzed by ΕLISA. Figures 27a-c are cross sectional views of three preferred embodiments of prefiltration devices according to the present invention. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention encompasses methods for concentrating particular microorganism or microorganisms of interest from a sample. The methods of the present invention are effected by contacting the sample with a matrix to which is bound an affinity receptor specific for the microorganism(s). Advantageously, according to the present methods, the sample can be a sample having ultra low level(s) of microorganism(s) with as few as 0.00025, 0.001, 0.008 or <1 CFU/ml or as many as 10 3 CFU/ml of the microorganism(s) of interest. One advantage of the methods according to the present invention is that these methods obviate the need for a prolonged (e.g., > 8 or 10 hours, overnight) pre-enrichment step, and in some cases obviates the need for any pre-enrichment, of the microorganism(s) prior to their concentration by the method. The invention further relates to a prefiltration method and device, which are advantageously used in combination with the concentration methods of the present invention, as further detailed hereinunder. The principles and operation of the present invention may be better understood with reference to the drawings and accompanying descriptions. Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. Matrix selection: Any matrix can be employed according to the present invention for concentrating a particular microorganism or microorganisms of interest. A matrix according to the present invention is selected such that in combination with an appropriate affinity receptor which is capable of specifically binding the microorganism, which affinity receptor is boundable to the matrix, an affinity concentrator device is obtainable, which device efficiently captures the particular microorganism(s) even if present in a very low level in the analyzed sample, thereby obviating the need for prolonged pre-enrichment steps prior to concentration. It will be appreciated that affinity receptors, antibodies in particular, can be readily immobilized onto a variety of natural and synthetic matrices. Further considerations for matrix selection include (i) the ability of the matrix to efficiently pass large volumes of particulated liquid without clogging; and (ii) low or no inherent affinity for the microorganism(s) in the sample being tested. It will be appreciated that having these criteria in mind, one ordinarily skilled in the art would be able to select and test the performance of a variety of matrices and to experimentally or rationally conclude whether a specific matrix is operable and characterized as described herein. For example, the ordinary artisan will select a matrix (i) to which an antibody can be directly or indirectly immobilized; (ii) which is not clogged upon passage of a large volumes (e.g., 2 ml - 10 liters) of a particulated liquid, such as a solution including particulated meat; and (iii) which has low or substantially no inherent affinity for the microorganism(s) in the sample being tested. Thus, a matrix operable with the microorganism(s) concentration methods of the present invention include both natural and synthetic matrices. Examples of natural matrices operable with the microorganism(s) concentration methods of the present invention include polysaccharide matrices, such as, but not limited to, a cellulosic matrix, an agarose matrix, a chitin matrix, a starch matrix and derivatives thereof. The matrix according to the present invention can also be a coated matrix. A coated matrix includes a structural core and a coat to which the affinity receptor is bound (immobilized). Examples of synthetic matrices operable with the microorganism(s) concentration methods of the present invention include synthetic polymers, such as, but not limited to, a polypropylene matrix, polyester matrix, a polyamide matrix, a polyethylene matrix, an acrylamide matrix, a methacrylate matrix, a sepharose matrix, a polystyrene matrix and matrices which are derivatives of the above matrices. Methods of binding affinity receptors, such as antibodies or other peptides, to any of the above matrices are well known in the art and can include, as further detailed hereinunder binding via a coupled counterpart moiety having specific affinity to the matrix or component thereof, binding via covalent interactions and/or binding via what is known in the art as non-specific interactions. Examples are provided hereinunder, preferred protocols are provided in a plurality of laboratory manuals, including, G.T. Hermanson et al. (1992) "Immobilized Affinity Ligand Techniques", Academic Press, San Diego. Further detail relating to synthetic matrices such as polyester are found in U.S. Patent No. 5,196,757, which is incorporated herein by reference. The matrix employed with the microorganism(s) concentration methods of the present invention can be of a plurality of forms, including, but not limited to beads, threads, a cloth, a woven material, a non-woven material, a membrane, a powder, a foam or a sponge. Such forms are well known in the art for both synthetic and natural matrices. It is appreciated that for most applications non-porous matrices are preferred since such matrices are known to have low or no affinity to bacteria and are also less prone to clogging. However, porous matrices having pours which are small enough so as to prevent the entry of bacteria thereto, e.g., pours in the nanometer range, can be readily employed to effect the microorganism(s) concentration methods of the present invention. Preferred matrices according to the present invention include those matrices to which a moiety having affinity thereto is known. Such a moiety can be conjugated or fused to the affinity receptor to thereby assist in binding (immobilizing) the affinity receptor to the matrix. Such a moiety, which is referred to herein also as a counter moiety is preferably a matrix binding peptide, such as, but not limited to, and as further detailed hereinunder, a polysaccharide binding protein or domain. According to preferred embodiments of the present invention the matrix used in the microorganism concentration methods are preferably made of cellulosic or chitin material. The cellulosic material can be in any of a variety of forms, for example, but not limited to, crystalline cellulose, such as AVICELL™ (FMC Corp., Philadelphia, PA), porous and non- porous cellulose beads and bacterial microcrystalline cellulose; a mix of crystalline and amorphous cellulose such as cellulose sponges, cotton fibers or "balls", and cotton or cellulose gauze; non-woven and woven viscose fibers, or amorphous cellulose such as phosphoric acid swollen cellulose and other solid matrices coated with cellulose or cellulose derivatives such as cellulose acetate or ethyl hydroxyl ethyl cellulose ("EHEC"), etc. The chitin material can be, for example, but not limited to, granular chitin from crab shells (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) or chitin beads. Most preferably, the cellulosic or chitin matrix is a material that will not clog upon filtering large volumes of sample. Matrix binding peptides: As used herein in the specification and in the claims section below, a "matrix binding peptide" includes peptides e.g., proteins and domains (portions) thereof, which are capable of affinity binding to the matrix of choice. The phrase thus includes, for example, peptides screened for their matrix binding activity out of a library, such as a peptide library or a DNA library (e.g. , a cDNA expression library or a display library). Yet, the phrase also includes peptides designed and engineered to be capable of binding to a matrix and/or units thereof. Such peptides include amino acid sequences that are derived from a matrix binding region, of e.g. , a polysaccharide binding protein or a polysaccharide binding domain e.g. , of a polysaccharidase. The polysaccharide binding peptide can include any amino acid sequence or a glycoprotein derivative thereof which binds to an oligosaccharide polymer, for example, the polysaccharide binding domain or protein can be derived from a polysaccharidase, a binding domain of a polysaccharide binding protein or a protein screened for and isolated from a peptide library or a protein designed and engineered to be capable of binding to a polysaccharide or saccharide units thereof. The polysaccharide binding domain or protein can be naturally occurring or synthetic. Suitable polysaccharidases from which a polysaccharide binding domain or protein may be obtained include β-l,4-glucanases. In a preferred embodiment, a polysaccharide binding domain or protein from a cellulase or scaffoldin is used. Typically, the amino acid sequence is essentially lacking in the hydrolytic activity of the polysaccharidase, but retains the substrate binding activity. The amino acid sequence preferably has less than about 10 % of the hydrolytic activity of the native polysaccharidase; more preferably less than about 5 % , and most preferably less than about 1 % of the hydrolytic activity of the native polysaccharidase, ideally no activity altogether. The polysaccharide binding domain or protein can be obtained from a variety of sources, including enzymes and other proteins which bind to polysaccharides which find use in the subject invention. In Table 5 below are listed those binding domains which bind to one or more soluble/insoluble polysaccharides including all binding domains with affinity for soluble glucans (α, β, and/or mixed linkages). The NI cellulose-binding domain from endoglucanase CenC of C. fimi is the only protein known to bind soluble cellosaccharides and one of a small set of proteins which are known to bind any soluble polysaccharides. Also, listed in Tables 1 to 4 are examples of proteins containing putative β -1,3-glucan-binding domains (Table 1); proteins containing Streptococcal glucan-binding repeats (Cpl superfamily) (Table 2); enzymes with chitin- binding domains (Table 3), and starch-binding domains (Table 4). Scaffoldin proteins which include a cellulose binding domain protein such as that produced by Clostridium cellulovorans (Shoseyov et al., PCT/US94/04132) can also be used for preparing a polysaccharide binding domain or protein. Several fungi, including Trichoderma species and others, also produce polysaccharidases from which polysaccharide binding domains or proteins can be isolated. Additional examples can be found in, for example, Microbial Hydrolysis of Polysaccharides, R. A. J. Warren, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1996, 50:183-212; and "Advances in Microbial Physiology" R. K. Poole, Ed. , 1995, Academic Press Limited, both are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. In addition, U.S. Pat. No. 5,643,758 teaches a maltose binding protein capable of binding to the polysaccharide α-amylose. Table 1 Overview of proteins containing putative β-1,3 glucan-binding domains Source (strain) Protein accession No. Ref 1 Type I B. άrculans (WL-12) GLCA1 P23903/M34503/JQ0420 1 B. circulans (IAM 1165) BglH JN0772/D17519/S67033 2 Type ll Actinomadura sp. (FC7) Xynll U08894 3 Arthrobacter sp. (YCWD3) GLCI D23668 9 0. xanthineolytica GLC P22222/M60826/A39094 4 R. faecitabidus (YLM-50) RP I Q05308/A45053/D 10753 5a,b R. communis Ricin A12892 6 S. lividans (1326) XlnA P26514/M64551/JS079867 T. tridentatus FactorGa D 16622 8 B. : Bacillus, O. : Oerskovia, R. faecitabidus : Rarobacter faecitabidus, R. communis: Ricinus communis, S. : Streptomyces, T. : Tachypleus (Horseshoe Crab) ^References: 1) Yahata et al. (1990) Gene 86, 113-117 2) Yamamoto et al. (1993) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 57, 1518-1525 3) Harpin et al. (1994) EMBL Data Library 4) Shen et al. (1991) /. Biol. Chem. 266, 1058-1063 5a) Shimoi et al. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25189-25195 5b) Shimoi et al. (1992) J. Biochem 110, 608-613 6) Horn et al. (1989) Patent A12892 7) Shareck et al. (1991) Gene 107, 75-82 8) Seki et al. (1994) . Biol. Chem. 269, 1370-1374 9) Watanabe et al. (1993) EMBL Data Library Table 2 Overview of proteins containing Streptococcal glucan-binding repeats (Cpl superfamily) Source Protein Accession No. Ref 5. downei (sobrinus) (0MZ176) GTF-I D13858 1 S. downei (sobrinus) (MFe28) GTF-I P11001/M17391 2 S. downei (sobrinus) (MFe28) GTF-S P29336/M30943/A41483 3 S. downei (sobrinus) (6715) GTF-I P27470/D90216/A38175 4 S. downei (sobrinus) DEI L34406 5 S. mutants (Ingbritt) GBP M30945/A37184 6 S. mutants (GS-5) GTF-B A33128 7 S. mutants (GS-5) GTF-B P08987/M17361/B33135 8 S. mutants GTF . B 3'-ORF P05427/C33135 8 S. mutants (GS-5) GTF-C P13470/M17361/M220549 5. mutants (GS-5) GTF-C not available 10 S. mutants (GS-5) GTF-D M29296/A45866 11 S. salivarius GTF-J A44811/S22726/S28809 12 Z11873/M64111 S. salivarius GTF-K S22737/S22727/Z 11872 13 S. salivarius (ATCC25975) GTF-L L35495 14 S. salivarius (ATCC25975) GTF-M L35928 14 S. pneumoniae R6 LytA P06653/A25634/M13812 15 S. pneumoniae PspA A41971/M74122 16 Phage HB-3 HBL P32762/M34652 17 Phage Cp-1 CPL-1 P15057/J03586/A31086 18 Phage Cp-9 CPL-9 P19386/M34780/JQ0438 19 Phage EJ-1 EJL A42936 20 C. difficile (VPI 10463) ToxA P16154/A37052/M30307 21 X51797/S08638 C. difficile (BARTS WI) ToxA A60991/X17194 22 C. difficile (VPI 10463) ToxB P18177/X53138/X60984 23,24 S10317 C. difficile (1470) ToxB S44271/Z23277 25,26 C. novyi a-toxin S44272/Z23280 27 C. novyi a-toxin Z48636 28 C. acetobutylicum (NCIB8052) CspA S49255/Z37723 29 C. acetobutylicum (NCIB8052) CspB Z50008 30 C. acetobutylicum (NCIB8052) CspC Z50033 30 C. acetobutylicum (NCIB8052) CspD Z50009 30 2 Ref( erences: 1) Sato et al. (1993) DNA sequence 4, 19-27 2) Ferreti et al. (1987) J. Bacteriol. 169, 4271-4278 3) Gilmore et al. (1990) /. Infect. Immun. 58, 2452-2458 4) Abo et al. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 989-996 5) Sun et al. (1994) /. Bacteriol. 176, 7213-7222 6) Banas et al. (1990) 1. Infect. Immun. 58, 667-673 7) Shiroza et al. (1990) Protein Sequence Database 8) Shiroza et al. (1987) J. Bacteriol. 169, 4263-4270 9) Ueda α α/. (1988) Gene 69, 101-109 10) Russel (1990) Arch. Oral. Biol. 35, 53-58 11) Honda et al. (1990) /. Gen. Microbiol. 136, 2099-2105 12) Giffard et al. (1991) J. Gen. Microbiol. 137, 2577-2593 13) Jacques ( 1992) EMBL Data Library 14) Simpson et al. (1995) 1. Infect. Immun. 63, 609-621 15) Gargia et al. (1986) Gene 43, 265-272 16) Yother et al. (1992) /. Bacteriol. 174, 601-609 17) Romero et al. (1990) /. Bacteriol. Ill, 5064-5070 18) Garcia et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA 85, 914-918 19) Garcia et al. (1990) Gene 86, 81-88 20) Diaz et al. (1992) /. Bacteriol. 174, 5516-5525 21) Dove et al. (1990) 1. Infect. Immun. 58, 480-488 22) Wren et al. (1990) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 70, 1-6 23) Barroso et a. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 4004-4004 24) von Eichel-Streiber et al. (1992) Mol. Gen. Genet. 233, 260-268 25) Sartinger et al. (1993) EMBL Data Library 26) von Eichel-Streiber et al. (1995) Mol. Microbiol. In Press 27) Hofmann et al. (1993) EMBL Data Library 28) Hofmann et al. (1995) Mol. Gen. Genet. In Press 29) Sanchez et al. (1994) EMBL Data Library 30) Sanchez et al. (1995) EMBL Data Library New polysaccharide binding domains or proteins with interesting binding characteristics and specificities can be identified and screened for in a variety of ways including spectroscopic (titration) methods such as: NMR spectroscopy (Zhu et al. Biochemistry (1995) 34:13196-13202, Gehring et al. Biochemistry (1991) 30:5524-5531), UV difference spectroscopy (Belshaw et al. Eur. J. Biochem. (1993) 211:717-724), fluorescence (titration) spectroscopy (Miller et al. J. Biol. Chem. (1983) 258:13665-13672), UV or fluorescence stopped flow analysis (De Boeck et al. Eur. J. Biochem. (1985) 149: 141-415), affinity methods such as affinity electrophoresis (Mimura et al. J. chromatography (1992) 597:345- 350) or affinity chromatography on immobilized mono or oligosaccharides, precipitation or agglutination analysis including turbidimetric or nephelometric analysis (Knibbs et al. J. Biol. Chem. (1993) 14940-14947), competitive inhibition assays (with or without quantitative IC50 deteπriination) and various physical or physico-chemical methods including differential scanning or isothermal titration calorimetry (Sigurskjold et al. J. Biol. Chem. (1992) 267:8371-8376; Sigurskjold et al. Eur. J. Biol. (1994) 225: 133-141) or comparative protein stability assays (melts) in the absence or presence of oligo saccharides using thermal CD or fluorescence spectroscopy. The K a for binding of the polysaccharide binding domains or proteins to oligosaccharide is at least in the range of weak antibody- antigen extractions, i.e. , > 10 3 , preferably 10 4 , most preferably 10 6 M _1 . If the binding of the polysaccharide binding domain or protein to the oligosaccharide is exothermic or endothermic, then binding will increase or decrease, respectively, at lower temperatures, providing a means for temperature modulation of the immobilization step. Table 3 Overview of enzymes with chitin-binding domains Source (strain) Enzyme Accession No. Ref. ; Bacterial enzymes Type I Aeromonas sp. (Nol0S-24) Chi D31818 1 Bacillus circulans (WL-12) ChiAl P20533/M57601/A38368 2 Bacillus circulans (WL-12) ChiD P27050/D10594 3 Janthinobacterium lividum Chi69 U07025 4 Streptomyces griseus ProteaseC A53669 5 Type II Aeromonas cavia (Kl) Chi U09139 6 Alteromonas sp (0-7) Chi85 A40633/P32823/D 13762 7 Autographa californica (C6) NPH-128 3 P41684/L22858 8 Serratia marcescens ChiA A25090/X03657/L01455/P07254 9 Type III Rhizopus oligosporus (IF08631) Chil P29026/A47022/D10157/S27418 10 Rhizopus oligosporus (IF08631) Chi2 P29027/B47022/D10158/S27419 10 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chi S50371/U 17243 11 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chil P29028/M74069 12 (DBY939) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chi2 P29029/M7407/B41035 12 (DBY918) Plant enzymes Hevein superfamily Allium sativum Chi M94105 13 Amaranthus caudatus AMP-l b P27275/A40240 14, 15 Amaranthus caudatus AMP-2 b S37381/A40240 14, 15 Arabidopsis thaliana ChiB P19171/M38240/B45511 16 (cv. Colombia) Arabidopsis thaliana PHP C U01880 17 Brassica napus Chi U21848 18 Brassica napus Chi2 Q09023/M95835 19 Hevea brasiliensis Hevl d P02877/M36986/A03770/A38288 20, 21 Hordeum vulgare Chi33 L34211 22 Lycopersicon esculentum Chi9 Q05538/Z15140/S37344 23 Nicotiana tabacum CBP20 e S72424 24 Nicotiana tabacum Chi A21091 25 Nicotiana tabacum (cv. Havana) Chi A29074/M 15173/S20981/S19855 26 Nicotiana tabacum (FB7-1) Chi JQ0993/S0828 27 Nicotiana tabacum (cv. Samsun) Chi A16119 28 Nicotiana tabacum (cv. Havana) Chi P08252/X16939/S08627 27 Nicotiana tabacum (cv. BY4) Chi P24091 /X51599/X64519//S 13322 26,27,29 Nicotiana tabacum (cv. Havana) Chi P29059/X64518/S20982 26 Oryza sativum (IR36) ChiA L37289 30 Oryza sativum ChiB JC2253/S42829/Z29962 31 Oryza sativum Chi S39979/S40414/X56787 32 Oryza sativum (cv. Jap< snicum) Chi X56063 33 Oryza sativum (cv. Japonicum) Chil P24626/X54367/S 14948 34 Oryza sativum Chi2 P25765/S 15997 35 Oryza sativum (cv. Japonicum) Chi3 D16223 Oryza sativum ChiA JC2252/S42828 30 Oryza sativum Chil D16221 32 Oryza sativum (IR58) Chi U02286 36 Oryza sativum Chi X87109 37 Pisum sativum (cv. Birte) Chi P36907/X63899 38 Pisum sativum (cv. Alcan) Chi2 L37876 39 Populus trichocarpa Chi S 18750/S 18751 /X59995/P29032 40 Populus trichocarpa (HI 1-11) Chi U01660 41 Phaseolus vulgaris (cv. Saxa) Chi A24215/S43926/Jq0965/P36361 42 Phaseolus vulgaris (cv. Saxa) Chi f P06215/M13968/M19052/A25898 43,44,45 Sambucus nigra PR-3 Z46948 46 Secale cereale Chi JC2071 47 Solanum tuberosum ChiBl U02605 48 Solanum tuberosum ChiB2 U02606 48 Solanum tuberosum ChiB3 U02607/S43317 48 Solanum tuberosum ChiB4 U02608 48 Solanum tuberosum WIN- 18 P09761/X13497/S04926 49 (cv. Maris Piper) Solanum tuberosum WIN-2S P09762/X13497/S04927 49 (cv. Maris Piper) Triticum aestivum Chi h S38670/X76041 50 Triticum aestivum WGA-l n P10968/M25536/S09623/S07289 51,52 Triticum aestivum WGA-2h P02876/M25537/S09624 51,53 Triticum aestivum WGA-3 P10969/J02961/S10045/A28401 54 Ulmus americana (NPS3-487) Chi i L22032 55 Urtica dioica AGL M87302 56 Vigna unguiculata Chil X88800 57 (cv. Red caloona) a NHP : nuclear polyhedrosis virus endochitinase like sequence; Chi : chitinase, °anti-microbial peptide, C pre-hevein like protein, ^hevein, e chitin-binding protein, athogenesis related protein, Swound-induced protein, n wheat germ agglutinin, agglutinin (lectin). ^References: 1) Udea et al. (1994) 1. Ferment. Bioeng. 78, 205-211 Watanabe et al. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 15659-16565 Watanabe et al. (1992) 1. Bacteriol. 174, 408-414 Gleave et al. (1994) EMBL Data Library Sidhu et al. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20167-20171 Jones et al. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 467-473 Sitrit et al. (1994) EMBL Data Library 8 Genbank entry only 9 Tsujibo et al. (1993) 7. Bacteriol. 175, 176-181 ιo: Yanai et al. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 7398-7406 11 Pauley (1994) EMBL Data Library 12: Kuranda et al. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19758-19767 13 van Damme et al. (1992) EMBL Data Library 14 Broekaert et al. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 4308-4314 15 de Bolle et al. (1993) Plant Mol. Physiol. 22, 1187-1190 16 Samac et al. (1990) Plant Physiol. 93, 907-914 17 Potter et al. (1993) Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 6, 680-685 18 Buchanan- Wollaston (1995) EMBL Data Library 19 Hamel et al. (1993) Plant Physiol. 101, 1403-1403 20 Broekaert et al. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 7633-7637 21 Lee et al. (1991) 1. Biol. Chem. 266, 15944-15948 22 Leah et al. (1994) Plant Physiol. 6, 579-589 23 Danhash et al. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 22 1017-1029 24 ' Ponstein et al. (1994) Plant Physiol. 104, 109-118 25 Meins et al. (1991) Patent EP0418695-A1 26; van Buuren et al. (1992) Mol. Gen. Genet. 232, 460-469 27 Shinshi et al. (1990) Plant Mol. Biol. 14, 357-368 28 Cornellisen et al. (1991) Patent EP0440304-A2 29 Fukuda et al. (1991) Plant Mol. Biol. 16, 1-10 3o; Yun et al. (1994) EMBL Data Library 31 Kim et al. (1994) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 58, 1164-1166 32 Nishizawa et al. (1993) Mol. Gen. Genet. 241, 1-10 33 Nishizawa et al. (1991) Plant Sci 76, 211-218 34 Huang et al. (1991) Plant Mol. Biol. 16, 479-480 35 Zhu et al. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 226, 289-296 36. Muthukrishhnan et al. (1993) EMBL Data Library 37 Xu (1995) EMBL Data Library 38 Vad et al. (1993) Plant Sci 92, 69-79 39 Chang et al. (1994) EMBL Data Library 40; Davis et al. (1991) Plant Mol. Biol. 17, 631-639 41 Clarke et al. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25, 799-815 42 Broglie et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1, 599-607 43 Broglie et al. (1986) Proc. Natl. acad. Sci. USA 83, 6820-6824 44 Lucas et al. (1985) FEBS Lett. 193, 208-210 45 Hedrick et al. (1988) Plant Physiol. 86, 182-186 46 Roberts et al. (1994) £ 5L Data Library I 47 Vamagami et al. (1994) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 58, 322-329 48; Beerhues et al. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 24, 353-367 49 Stanford et al. (1989) Mo/. Gen. Genef. 215, 200-208 50 Liao et al. (1993) EMBL Data Library 51 Smith et al. (1989) Plant Mol. Biol. 13, 601-603 52 Wright et α/. (1989) J. Mol. Evol. 28, 327-336 53 Wright et al. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 280-287 54 Raikhel ef al. (1987) Proc. at/, acaa". Sci. USA 84, 6745-6749 55 Hajela et al. (1993) £M5L Data Library 56. Lerner et a/. (1992) 7. Biol. Chem. 267, 11085-11091 57 Vo et al. (1995) EMBL Data Library Table 4 Overview of enzymes containing starch-binding domains Source (strain) Enzyme Accession No. Ref. 4 A. awarori (var. kawachi) AMYG P23176/D00427/JT0479 1, 2 A. niger (T21) AMYG S73370 3 A. niger -A. awamori AMYG1/G2 P04064/ A90986/ A29166/X00712/ X00548 4,5,6 K02465 7,8,9 A. oryzae AMYG (GLAA) P36914/JQ1346/D01035/S75274/ D01108 10, 11 A. Shirousamii AMYG (GLA) P22832/JQ0607/D10460 12 Bacillus sp. (B1018) AMY a P17692/M33302/D90112/S09196 13 Bacillus sp. (TS-23) a-AMY U22045 14 Bacillus sp. (1-1) CGT P31746/S26399 15 Bacillus sp. (6.63) CGT P31747/X66106/S21532 16 Bacillus sp. (17-1) CGT P30921/M28053/A37208 17 Bacillus sp. (38-2) CGT P09121/M19880/D00129/S24193 18, 19 Bacillus sp. (1011) CGT P05618/A26678/M17366 20 Bacillus sp. (DSM5850) CGT A18991 21 Bacillus sp. (KC 201) CGT D 13068 15, 22 B. cereus (SPOII) b-AMY A48961/P36924/S54911 23 B. circulans (8) CGT P30920/X68326/S23674 24 B. circulans (251) CGT X78145 25 B. Licheniformis CGTA P14014/X15752/S15920 26 B. macerans (IFO 3490) CGTM (CDG1) P04830/X5904/S31281 27 B. macerans (IAM 1243) CGT M12777 28 β . macerans CGT (CDG2) P31835/S26589 29 B. ohbensis CGT P27036/D90243 30 B. stearothermophilus AMYM b P19531/M36539/S28784 31 B. stearothermophilus (N02) CGT P31797/X59042/S26588/X59043/ X59404/S31284 32 C. rø//jτϊ (AHU 9627) AMYG2 D49448 33 D. discoideum ORF S15693/X51947 34 H. grisea (var. thermoidea) GLA1 M89475 35 H. resinae (ATCC20495) GAMP Q03045/X68143/X67708/S31422, l S33908 36-38 K. pneumoniae (M5A1) CGT P08704/M 15264/ A29023 39 N. crassa (74-OR23-1A) GLA-1 P14804/X67291/S13711/S13710/ S36364 40, 41 P. saccharophila (IAM 1504) MTA C P22963/X16732/S05667 42 Pseudomonas sp. (KO-8940) AMF-l d D10769/JS0631/D01143 43 P. stutzeri (MO- 19) AMYP C P13507/M24516/A32803 44 S. griseus (IMRU 3570) AMY P30270/X57568/S 14063 45 S. limosus (S.albidoflavus) AML P09794/ M18244/B28391 46 5. violaceus (S. Venezuela) AML P22998/M25263/JS0101 47 (ATCC 15068) 77Ϊ. curvata (CCM 3352) TAM e P29750/X59159/JH0638 48 Th. thermosulfurogenes * AMYA P26827/X54654/X54982/ (DSM3896/EM1) S17298/S37706 49 Th. thermosulfurogenes AMYB P19584/M22471/A31389 50 (ATCC 33743) a Raw-starch digesting amylase, b Maltogenic α-amylase, c Maltotetraose-forming amylase (1,4-α-maltotetrahydrolase), d Maltoρentaose-forming amylase, e thermostable α-amylase, 'formerly Clostridium thermosulfurogenes. AMYG, GAM and GLA: glucoamylase, AMY or AML: alpha-amylase, CGT: β-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase or cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase, ORF: open reading frame. A. : Aspergillus, B. : Bacillus, C. : Corticium, D.: Dictiostelium, H. grisea: Humicola grisea, H. resinea: Hormoconis resinae (Amorphotheca resinae), K. : Klebsiella, N. : Neurospora, S.: Streptomyces, Th. curvata: Thermomonospora curvata, Th. : Thermoanaerobacter. ' ♦ References: 1) Hayashida et al. (1989) Agric. Biol. Chem. 53, 135-141 2) Hayashida et al. (1989) Agric. Biol. Chem. 53,923-929 3) Zhong et al. (1994) Wei Sheng Wu Hseuh Pao 34, 184-190 4) Boel et al. (1984) EMBO J. 3, 1097-1102 5) Boel et al. (1984) EMBO J. 3, 1581-1583 6) Svensson et al. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 154, 497-502 7) Svensson et al. (1983) Carlsberg Res. Commun.. 48, 529-544 8) Nunberg et al. (1984) Mol. Cell. Biol. 4, 2306-2315 9) Flwer et al. (1990) Curr. Genet. 18, 537-545 10) Hata et al. (1991) Agric. biol. Chem. 55, 941-949 11) Hata et al. (1991) Gene 108, 145-150 12) Shibuya et al. (1990) Agric. Biol. Chem. 54, 1905-1914 13) Ifkor et al. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. res. Commun. 166, 630-636 14) Lin et al. (1995) EMBL Data Library 15) Schimd et al. (1988) Proceedings of the fourth International symposium on cyclodextrins. Huber, O. and Szejtli, J. Eds. pρ71-76. Kluwer, Academic Publishers. 16)Akhmetzjanov (1992) EMBL Data Library 17) Kaneko et al. (1989) 1. Gen. Microbiol. 135, 3447-3457 18) Kaneko et al. (1988) /. Gen. Microbiol. 134, 97-105 19) Hamamoto et al. (1987) Agric. Biol. Chem. 51, 2019-2022 20) Kimura et al. (1987) /. Bacteriol. 169, 4399-4402 21) Patent WO9114770-A1 22) Kitamoto et al. (1992) J. Ferment. Bioeng. 74, 345-351 23) Nanmori et al. (1993) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 623-627 24) Nitschke et al. (1990) Appl. Microbial. Biotechnol. 33, 542-546 25) Lawson et al. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 236, 590-560 26) Hill et al. (1990) Nucleids Acids Res. 18, 199-199 27) Fujiwara et al. (1992) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 4016-4025 28) Takano et al. (1986) J. Bacteriol. 166, 1118-1122 29) Sugimoto et al. Patent N UK2169902 30) Sin et al. (1991) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35, 600-605 31) Didericksen et al. (1988) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 56, 53-60 32) Fujiwara et al. (1992) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 4016-4025 33) Nagasaka ef al. (1995) EMBL Data Library 34) Maniak et al. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 3211-3217 35) Berka et al. (1992) EMBL Data Library 36) Joutsjoki et al. (1992) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 78, 237-244 37) Vainio et al. (1993) Curr. Genet. 24, 38-44 38) Fagerstrom et al. (1990) J. Gen. Microbiol. 136, 913-920 39) Binder et al. (1986) Gene 47, 269-277 40) Stone et al. (1989) Curr. Genet. 24, 205-211 41) Koh-Laur ef al. (1989) Enzym. Microb. Technol. 11, 692-695 42) Zhoe et al. (1989) FEBS Lett. 255, 37-41 43) Shida et al. (1991) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 56, 76-80 44)Fujita et al. (1989) J. Bacteriol. 171, 1333-1339 45) Vigal et al. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 225, 278-288 46) Long et al. (1987) J. Bacteriol. 169, 5745-5754 47) Virolle et al. (1988) Gene 74, 321-334 48) Petricek et al. (1992) Gene 112, 77-83 49) Bahl et al. (1991) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57, 1554-1559 50) Kitamoto et al. (1988) 1. Bacteriol. 170, 5848-5854 Table 5 Sources of polysaccharide binding domains Binding Domain Proteins Where Binding Domain is Found Cellulose Binding β-glucanases (avicelases, CMCases, Domains* cellodextrinases) exoglucanses or cellobiohydrolases cellulose binding proteins xylanases mixed xylanases/glucanases esterases chitinases β-l ,3-glucanases β-l,3-(β-l ,4)-glucanases (β-)mannanases β-glucosidases/galactosidases cellulose synthases (unconfirmed) Starch/Maltodextrin α-amylases^'^ Binding Domains β-amylases4>5 pullulanases glucoamylases6'7 cyclodextrin glucotransferases° " ^ (cyclonialtodextrin glucanotransferases) maltodextrin binding proteins ^ Dextran Binding Domains (Streptococcal) glycosyl transferasesl2 dextran sucrases (unconfirmed) Clostridial toxins^. ^ glucoamylases" dextran binding proteins β-Glucan Binding Domains β-1 ,3-glucanases^' ^ β-1 ,3-(β-l ,4)-glucanases (unconfirmed) β-l,3-glucan binding protein Chitin Binding Domains chitinases chitobiases chitin binding proteins (see also cellulose binding domains) Heivein 1 Gilkes et al., Adv. Microbiol Reviews, (1991) 303-315. 2 S?gaard et al., J.Biol. Chem. (1993) 268:22480. 3 Weselake et al, Cereal Chem. (1983) 60:98. 4 Svensson et al, J. (1989) 264:309. 5 Jespersen et al, J. (1991) 280:51. 6 Belshaw et al, Eur. J. Biochem. (1993) 211 :717. 7 Sigurskjold et al, Eur. J. Biochem. (1994) 225: 133. 8 Villette et al, Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. (1992) 16:57. 9 Fukada et al, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. (1992) 56:556. 10 Lawson et al, J. Mol. Biol. (1994) 236:590. 14 von Eichel-Streiber et al, Mol Gen. Genet. (1992) 233:260. 15 Klebl et al, J. Bacteriol. (1989) 171 :6259. 16 Watanabe et al, J. Bacteriol. (1992) 174:186. 17 Duvic et al, J. Biol. Chem. (1990) :9327. Once the most appropriate polysaccharide binding peptide for a particular application has been identified, the polysaccharide binding protein or domain can be prepared by transforming into a host cell a DNA construct comprising DNA encoding the appropriate polysaccharide binding moiety. The phrase "polysaccharide binding peptide" intends an amino acid sequence which comprises at least a functional portion of the polysaccharide binding region of a polysaccharidase or a polysaccharide binding protein. The phrase further relates to glycoprotein derivatives of such amino acid sequences. The phrase further relates to a polypeptide screened for its polysaccharide binding activity out of a library, such as a peptide library or a DNA library (e.g. , a cDNA library or a display library). By "functional portion" is intended an amino acid sequence which binds to an oligosaccharide polymer of interest. The techniques used in isolating polysaccharidase genes, such as a cellulase gene, and genes for polysaccharide binding proteins are known in the art, including synthesis, isolation from genomic DNA, preparation from cDNA, or combinations thereof. (See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,137,819; 5,202,247; and 5,340,731) The sequences for several polypeptide binding domains, which bind to soluble oligosaccharides are known (See, Figure 1 of PCT/CA97/00033, WO 97/26358). The DNAs coding for a variety of polysaccharidases and polysaccharide binding proteins are also known. Various techniques for manipulation of genes are well known, and include restriction, digestion, resection, ligation, in vitro mutagenesis, primer repair, employing linkers and adapters, and the like (see Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1989). The amino acid sequence of a polysaccharidase also can be used to design a probe to screen a cDNA or a genomic library prepared from mRNA or DNA from cells of interest as donor cells for a polysaccharidase gene or a polysaccharide binding protein gene. By using the polysaccharidase cDNA or binding protein cDNA or a fragment thereof as a hybridization probe, structurally related genes found in other microorganisms can be easily cloned. Particularly contemplated is the isolation of genes from organisms that express polysaccharidase activity using oligonucleotide probes based on the nucleotide sequences of genes obtainable from an organism wherein the catalytic and binding domains of the polysaccharidase are discrete, although other polysaccharide binding proteins also can be used (see, for example, Shoseyov, et al. , Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. (USA) (1992) 89:3483-3487). Probes developed using consensus sequences for the binding domain of a polysaccharidase or polysaccharide-binding protein are of particular interest. The β-l,4-glycanases from C. fimi characterized to date are endoglucanases A, B, C and D (CenA, CenB, CenC and CenD, respectively), exocellobiohydrolases A and B (CbhA and CbhB, respectively), and xylanases A and D (Cex and XylD, respectively) (see Wong et al. (1986) Gene, 44:315; Meinke et al. (1991) J. Bacteriol., 173:308; Coutinho et al, (1991) Mol. Microbiol. 5:1221; Meinke et al, (1993) Bacteriol. , 175:1910; Meinke et al, (1994) Mol. Microbiol., 12:413; Shen et al, Biochem. J., in press; O'Neill et al, (1986) Gene, 44:325; and Millward-Sadler et al, (1994) Mol. Microbiol. , 11:375). All are modular proteins of varying degrees of complexity, but with two features in common: a catalytic domain (CD) and a cellulose-binding domain (CBD) which can function independently (see Millward-Sadler et al, (1994) Mol. Microbiol. , 11:375; Gilkes et al, (1988) J. Biol. Chem., 263:10401; Meinke et al, (1991) J. Bacteriol., 173:7126; and Coutinho et al, (1992) Mol. Microbiol., 6:1242). In four of the enzymes, CenB, CenD, CbhA and CbhB, fibronectin type III (Fn3) repeats separate the N- terminal CD from the C-terminal CBD. The CDs of the enzymes come from six of the families of glycoside hydrolases (see Henrissat (1991) Biochem. J. , 280:309; and Henrissat et al , (1993) Biochem. J., 293:781); all of the enzymes have an N- or C-terminal CBD or CBDs (see Tomme et al , Adv. Microb. Physiol., in press); CenC has tandem CBDs from family IV at its N-terminus; CenB and XylD each have a second, internal CBD from families III and II, respectively. Cex and XylD are clearly xylanases; however, Cex, but not XylD, has low activity on cellulose. Nonetheless, like several other bacterial xylanases (see Gilbert et al, (1993) J. Gen. Microbiol., 139:187), they have CBDs. C. firm probably produces other β-l,4-glycanases. Similar systems are produced by related bacteria (see Wilson (1992) Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. , 12:45; and Hazlewood et al, (1992) J. Appl. Bacteriol. , 72:244). Unrelated bacteria also produce glycanases; Clostridium thermocellum, for example, produces twenty or more β-l,4-glycanases (see Beguin et al, (1992) FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 100:523). The CBD derived from C. fimi endoglucanase C NI, is the only protein known to bind soluble cellosaccharides and one of a small set of proteins that are known to bind any soluble polysaccharides. Examples of suitable binding domains are shown in Figure 1 of PCT/CA97/00033 (WO 97/26358), which presents an alignment of binding domains from various enzymes that bind to polysaccharides and identifies amino acid residues that are conserved among most or all of the enzymes. This information can be used to derive a suitable oligonucleotide probe using methods known to those of skill in the art. The probes can be considerably shorter than the entire sequence but should at least be 10, preferably at least 14, nucleotides in length. Longer oligonucleotides are useful, up to the full legnth of the gene, preferably no more than 500, more preferably no more than 250, nucleotides in length. RNA or DNA probes can be used. In use, the probes are typically labeled in a detectable manner, for example, with 32p ? 3JJ, biotin, avidin or other detectable reagents, and are incubated with single-stranded DNA or RNA from the organism in which a gene is being sought. Hybridization is detected by means of the label after the unhybridized probe has been separated from the hybridized probe. The hybridized probe is typically immobilized on a solid matrix such as nitrocellulose paper. Hybridization techniques suitable for use with oligonucleotides are well known to those skilled in the art. Although probes are normally used with a detectable label that allows easy identification, unlabeled oligonucleotides are also useful, both as precursors of labeled probes and for use in methods that provide for direct detection of double-stranded DNA (or DNA/RNA). Accordingly, the term "oligonucleotide probe" refers to both labeled and unlabeled forms. Generally, the binding domains identified by probing nucleic acids from an organism of interest will show at least about 40 % identity (including as appropriate allowances for conservative substitutions, gaps for better alignment and the like) to the binding region or regions from which the probe was derived and will bind to a soluble β-1,4 glucan with a K a of ≥ 10-* M"l. More preferably, the binding domains will be at least about 60 % identical, and most preferably at least about 70 % identical to the binding region used to derive the probe. The percentage of identity will be greater among those amino acids that are conserved among polysaccharidase binding domains. Analyses of amino acid sequence comparisons can be performed using programs in PC/Gene (IntelliGenetics, Inc.). PCLUSTAL can be used for multiple sequence alignment and generation of phylogenetic trees. In order to isolate the polysaccharide binding protein or a polysaccharide binding domain from an enzyme or a cluster of enzymes that binds to a polysaccharide, several genetic approaches can be used. One method uses restriction enzymes to remove a portion of the gene that codes for portions of the protein other than the binding portion thereof. The remaining gene fragments are fused with expression control sequences to obtain a mutated gene that encodes a truncated protein. Another method involves the use of exonucleases such as BaBl to systematically delete nucleotides either externally from the 5' and the 3' ends of the DNA or internally from a restricted gap within the gene. These gene deletion methods result in a mutated gene encoding a shortened protein molecule which can then be evaluated for substrate or polysaccharide binding ability. Appropriate substrates for evaluating binding activity include those for the enzymes are listed in Tables 1-5 above, as well as the carbohydrates listed in Table 6 below. Table 6 Uncharged Charged Low Polysaccharides* Polysaccharides Molecular Weight Compounds Dextran Na carboxymethyl Dextrins derived from Hydroxypropyl dextran dextran cellulose (Cellotriose, Carboxymethyl dextran Na carboxymethyl cellotetraose, etc.) Maltodextrin xylotriose, etc. Xylose, xylobiose, Arabinogalactan Na dextran sulfate cellulose Hydroxypropyl starch DEAE dextran Maltodextrins and Amylopectin Polygalacturonic acid derivatives Methyl cellulose (pectin) Hydroxyethyl cellulose Ethylhydroxyethyl cellulose Carboxymethyl cellulose Hydroxypropyl cellulose Ficoll Carboxymethyl starch Hydroxyethyl starch Pullulan Chitin Polymers can be crude or purified. According to preferred embodiments of the present invention a cellulose binding protein or cellulose binding domain is employed as a counterpart moiety having affinity to the matrix of choice and thus serves as a matrix binding peptide, as this term is defined hereinabove. Any cellulose binding protein or cellulose binding domain may be used in the present invention. The term "cellulose binding protein" ("CBP") refers to any protein, polypeptide or peptide including a glycoprotein, which specifically binds to cellulose or hemicellulose or chitin. The cellulose binding protein may or may not have cellulose or cellulolytic activity. The term "cellulose binding domain" ("CBD") refers to any protein, polypeptide or peptide, including a glycoprotein, which is a region or portion of a larger protein, said region or portion which binds specifically to cellulose or hemicellulose or chitin. The cellulose binding domain (CBD) may be a part or portion of a cellulase, xylanase or other polysaccharidase, e.g., a chitinase, etc., a sugar binding protein such as maltose binding protein, or scaffoldin such as CbpA of Clostridium celluvorans, etc. Many cellulases and hemicellulases (e.g. xylanases and mannases) have the ability to associate with their substrates. These enzymes typically have a catalytic domain containing the active site for substrate hydrolysis and a carbohydrate- binding domain or cellulose-binding domain (herein generally designated "CBD") for binding the insoluble cellulosic or hemicellulosic matrices. The CBD may also be from a non-catalytic polysaccharide binding protein. To date, more than one hundred cellulose-binding domains (CBDs) have been classified into at least thirteen families designated I-XIII (Tomme et al., 1995, "CelluloseBinding Domains: Classification and Properties", in ACS Symposium Series 618 Enzymatic Degradation and Insoluble Carbohydrates, pp. 142-161, Saddler and Penner eds., American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. (Tomme I) ; Tomme et al., 1995, Adv. Microb. Physiol, 37:1 (Tomme II); and Smant et al., 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 95:4906,-4911) (incorporated herein by reference). Any of the CBDs described in Tomme I or II or any variants thereof, any other presently known CBDs or any new CBDs which may be identified can be used in the present invention. As an illustrative, but in no way limiting example, the CBP or CBD can be from a bacterial, fungal, slime mold, or nematode protein or polypeptide. For a more particular illustrative example, the CBD is obtainable from Clostridium cellulovorans, Clostridium cellulovorans, or Cellulomonas fimi (e.g., CenA, CenB, CenD, Cex). In addition, the CBD may be selected from a phage display peptide or peptidomimetic library, random or otherwise, using cellulose or any other polysaccharide or other matrix as a screening agent. (See Smith, 1985, Science 228:1315-1317 and Lam, 1991, Nature 354:82-84). Furthermore, the CBD may be derived by mutation of a portion of a protein, polypeptide or peptide, including a glycoprotein, which binds to a polysaccharide other than cellulose (or hemicellulose), such as a chitinase, which specifically binds chitin, or a sugar binding protein such as maltose binding protein, rendering said portion capable of binding to cellulose. In any event, the CBD binds cellulose or hemicellulose. Shoseyov and Doi (1990, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:21.92-2195) isolated a unique cellulose-binding protein (CbpA) from the cellulose "complex" of the cellulolytic bacterium Clostridium cellulovorans. This major subunit of the cellulose complex was found to bind to cellulose, but had no hydrolytic activity, and was essential for the degradation of crystalline cellulose. The CbpA gene has been cloned and sequenced (Shoseyov et al., 1992, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:3483-3487). Using PCR primers flanking the cellulose-binding domain (herein, this specific CBD is designated "cbd") of CbpA, the latter was successfully cloned into an overexpression vector that enabled overproduction of the approximately 17 kDa CBD in Escherichia coli. The recombinant CBD exhibits very strong affinity to cellulose and chitin (U.S. Pat. No. 5,496,934; Goldstein et al., 1993, J. Bacteriol. 175:5762; PCT International Publication WO 94/24158, all are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein). In recent years, several CBDs have been isolated from different sources. Most of these have been isolated from proteins that have separate catalytic, i.e., cellulose and cellulose binding domains, and only two have been isolated from proteins that have no apparent hydrolytic activity but possess cellulose-binding activity (Goldstein et al., 1993, J. Bacteriol. 175:5762-5768; Morag et al., 1995, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61-1980- 1986). Greenwood et al. (1989, FEBS Lett. 224:127-131) fused the cellulose binding region of Cellulomonas fimi endoglucanase to the enzyme alkaline phosphatase. The recombinant fusion protein retained both its phosphatase activity and the ability to bind to cellulose. For more descriptions of cellulose binding fusion proteins, see U.S. Patent No. 5,137,819 issued to Kilburn et al., and U.S. Patent No. 5,719,044 issued to Shoseyov et al. both incorporated by reference herein. Receptors and microorganisms: As used herein, an "affinity receptor" (anti-ligand) includes any compound or composition which recognizes a particular spatial and/or polar organization of a Iigand compound or composition, e.g., an epitopic or determinant site or a complementary binding site. Illustrative receptors include, but are not limited to, immunoglobulins or antibodies or antigen binding portions thereof, such as Fv, F(abl)2, Fab fragments, single chain antibodies, chimeric or humanized antibodies, complementary determining regions of antibodies; protein A; protein G; protein L; enzymes and non-catalytic fragments thereof; protein receptors; avidin or streptavidin; lectin binding proteins; oligosaccharides; nucleic acids and polynucleotides; oligolipids; etc. As will be understood easily by those skilled in the art, nucleic acids, oligonucleotides and polynucleotides which are complementary to one another can serve as receptor or anti-ligand and Iigand in the methods of the present invention. The receptors used in the present methods are capable of specifically or preferentially binding to a microorganism or microorganisms of interest. The microorganisms that can be concentrated or concentrated and detected using the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoans, and nematodes. For example, the bacteria can be Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, Legionella, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, Listeria, Staphylococcus, Bacillus, Shigella, Mycobacte ή a, Bordetella, Streptococcus, Helicobacter, etc. The viruses include, for example, but are not limited to, viruses of the families: Poxviridae, iridoviridae, Herpes viridae, Adenoviridae, Papovarviridae, and Retro viridae, such as the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) virus, etc. Fungi which can be concentrated and detected by the present invention include, for example, Aspergillus, Blastomyces, Candida (such as yeast), Coccidioides, Cryptococcus and Histoplasma, etc. The protozoan groups that can be detected by the present invention include, for example, Rhizopoda (e.g., amoeba such as Entamoeba histolytica, and Dientamoeba fragilis), Mastigophora (flagellates) (e.g., Giardia larablia), Ciliatea (ciliates) (e.g. Balantidium coli) and Sporozoa (e.g., Isospora, Crypto sporidium) . For further examples of microorganisms, see, Microbiology, 4th ed., Davis et al., 1990, J.B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, PA; and Fundamental Virology, 3rd ed., 1996, Lippencott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, PA. See also, Zinsser Microbiology 19th ed., Joklik et al., 1988, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, Conn., or any other available textbook on microbiology available to those skilled in the art. Antibodies: The present invention can utilize serum immunoglobulins, polyclonal antibodies or fragments thereof or monoclonal antibodies or fragments thereof. Preferably the antibodies are raised against a surface antigen of a microorganism. More preferably, the surface antigen is a flagellar protein or lipopolysaccharide. Preferably the antibodies are highly specific for the target microorganism and substantially do not react with other microorganisms found in sample being testing. Monoclonal antibodies or purified fragments of the monoclonal antibodies having at least a portion of an antigen binding region, including such as Fv, F(abl)2, Fab fragments (Harlow and Lane, 1988 Antibody, Cold Spring Harbor), single chain antibodies (U.S. Patent 4,946,778), chimeric or humanized antibodies (Morrison et al, 1984, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81 :6851; Neuberger et al., 1984, Nature 312:604-8) and complementarily determining regions (CDR) may be prepared by conventional procedures. Purification of these serum immunoglobulins antibodies or fragments can be accomplished by a variety of methods known to those of skill including, precipitation by ammonium sulfate or sodium sulfate followed by dialysis against saline, ion exchange chromatography, affinity or immunoaffinity chromatography as well as gel filtration, zone electrophoresis, etc. (see Goding in, Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed., pp. 104-126, 1986, Orlando, Fla., Academic Press). Binding (immobilizing) a receptor to a matrix: Many methods have been used to couple receptors (binding proteins/peptides) to natural and synthetic matrices. These include chemical conjugation involving activation of matrix and/or Iigand, streptavidin-biotin interactions, passive adsorption, and reversible and irreversible binding via CBD's and other saccharide binding proteins. Matrices can be natural supports, such as agarose, cellulose and controlled pore glass and silica. Matrices can also be synthetic supports such as acrylamide derivatives, methacrylate derivatives, polystyrene and its derivatives. Some examples of chemical and bio-interaction based coupling of peptides, antibodies and immunoglobulin binding proteins to various matrices follow. Kohn J. and Wilchek M. (1982, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 107(3): 878-874) describes mechanisms of activation by CNBr which can be used for coupling to natural supports such as polysaccharide matrices as well as synthetic polymers that contain hydroxyl groups. Periodate oxidized cross linked agarose has been used to immobilize proteins such as Human IgG (Domen et al, 1990, J. Chromatogr. 510: 293-302). Antibodies and their fragments can also be coupled by selectively reducing disulfides in the hinge region with 2-mercaptoethylamine to form free sulfhydryls which in turn can be immobilized to sulfhydryl-reactive supports designed to couple these groups such as a iodoacetyl activated agarose or other bromoacetyl, maleimide, divinylsulfone-activiated matrix of choice which may or may not be modified by spacer molecules (Hermanson G.T., Krishna Mallia A.K., Smith P.K. ("Immobilized Affinity Ligand Techniques", 1992, Academic Press, San Diego)). N-hydroxy succinimide esters (ΝHS esters) can also be used to activate supports containing hydroxyl groups. The reagent, N,N'- disuccinimidyl carbonate (DSC) has been used for this purpose (Miron T. and Wilchek M., 1987, Methods Enzymol. 135: 84-90; Miron T. and Wilchek M., 1993, Bioconjug. Chem. 4(6): 568-569; Wilchek M et al, 1994, Bioconjug. Chem. 5(5): 491-492) Although non covalent passive adsorption can be used to couple antibodies to porous and nonporous surfaces (Tijssen P. 1985, In "Practice and Theory of Enzyme Immunoassays," pp. 297. Elsevier, NY.) such as polystyrene and polystyrene/divinylbenzene, specific modification and coupling chemistry can provide covalently bound molecules. Electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions such as brief treatment with chlorosulphonic acid yield an amine-reactive surface for Iigand immobilization. Hermanson G.T., Krishna Mallia A.K., Smith P.K. ("Immobilized Affinity Ligand Techniques, 1992, Academic Press, San Diego) summarized methods used to generate functional groups on polystyrene by nitration followed by reduction to an aromatic amine. The aromatic amine can then be converted into an isocyanate, isothiocyanate, or a diazonium salt for reaction with ligands. Polyacrylamide beads have also been used to immobilize ligands. Hermanson G.T., Krishna Mallia A.K., Smith P.K. ("Immobilized Affinity Ligand Techniques, 1992, Academic Press, San Diego) summarized methods in which polyacrylamide can be activated by gluteraldehyde providing a multivalent aldehyde-containing intermediate useful for coupling amines via reductive amination. Other acrylamide derivatives include Trisacryl, Sephacryl, Ultrgel AcA and Azylactone which can also be used to immobilize ligands. Methacrylate derivatives such as TSK-Gel Toyopearl resin (Tosoh Corp. Japan) contain numerous hydroxyl groups within their matrix structure which are easily activated by CNBr, NN'-carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) (Hearn M.T.W., 1987, Methods Enzymol. 135: 102-117), tresyl, tosyl, epoxy and DVS. Alternatively, modification with glycidol followed by periodate oxidation can be used to couple amines of proteins. Other methacrylate derivatives that can be used to couple ligands include HEMA and Eupergit as reviewed by Hermanson G.T., Krishna Mallia A.K., Smith P.K. ("Immobilized Affinity Ligand Techniques, 1992, Academic Press, San Diego). Many methods have been used to couple receptors (binding proteins/peptides) to cellulosic matrices. These include, for example, chemical conjugation, streptavidin-biotin interactions, passive adsorption, and reversible and irreversible binding via CBD's. Some examples of chemical coupling and, streptavidin-biotin interactions follow: Ferrua B, Maiolini R, Masseyeff R, J. Immunol. Methods, 1979, 25(l):49-53 teach coupling of gamma-globulin to microcrytstalline cellulose by periodate oxidation. Hadge, D. Allerg Immunol (Leipz) 1990;36(4):299-307 described a method in which 25 mg of bovine IgG (BGG) was coupled to packed bead cellulose activated by 5-norbornene-2.3-dicarboximido carbonochloridate to obtain BGG-immunosorbents with 4.6 to 4.9 mg BGG/ml matrix. The use of these immunosorbents for affinity chromatography resulted in the isolation of one milligram of pure rabbit anti-BGG antibodies by means of about 4.6 mg of BGG coupled to the cellulose. Turkova J, Petkov L, Sajdok J, Kas J, Benes MJ, J. Chromatogr. 1990, Feb 2 (500):585-93 described a biospecific sorbent for the isolation of ovalbumin antibodies involving the preparation of coupled ovalbumin via its periodate-oxidized carbohydrate moiety to bead cellulose modified with adipic acid dihydrazide. The anti-ovalbumin IgG fraction isolated on this sorbent from immune rabbit serum contained only antibodies against protein determinants of ovalbumin. Thus, when these IgG were immobilized through their carbohydrate moieties to cellulose beads it became possible to prepare a biospecific sorbent for concanavalin A by oriented adsorption of ovalbumin. Ovalbumin was specifically adsorbed via its protein moiety and its carbohydrate part remained free for interaction with concanavalin A. al-Abdulla IH, Mellor GW, Childerstone MS, Sidki AM, Smith DS, J. Immunol. Methods, 1989, Sep 1, 122(2):253-8 compared the periodate and l,l'-carbonyldiimidazole activation methods with the cyanogen bromide procedure for coupling antibodies to magnetizable cellulose/iron oxide solid-phase particles. Fluoroimmunoassays for quinine, primaquine, normetanephrine and cannabinoids were employed to assess the binding properties of such coupled solid phases. The cyanogen bromide and 1,1'- carbonyldiimidazole methods gave similar products in most cases, while the specific binding capacity of periodate coupled particles was between two and five times lower. Nevertheless, comparable standard curves could be obtained with solid phase coupled by each method. The periodate and 1,1'- carbonyldiimidazole methods are acceptable alternatives, notably for laboratories lacking the facility to handle the toxic cyanogen bromide. Metelitsa DI, Pliugacheva El, Ermolenko IN, Liubliner IP, Kaputskii FN, Pratsenko VE, Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol. 1992, Jul-Aug, 28(4):531-8 performed covalent bindmg of bovine liver catalase to phosphate-cellulose matrices (gauze, granules, and paper with various surface density) and to acetate-cellulose porous membranes of different productivity. The capacity of the catalase binding to the molded cellulose carriers maximum concentration of the bound catalase after periodate oxidation of the carriers at room temperature was determined. Englebretsen DR, Harding DR, Pept. Res. 1994, Nov-Dec, 7(6):322- 6 used aminopropyl derivatized Perloza beaded cellulose acylated with alpha-bromoacetic anhydride to give alpha-bromo-acetamidopropyl Perloza. (N-Acetyl)-Cys-Ser-Tyr-Gly-Leu-Arg-Pro-Gly-NH2, the 7 C-terminal amino acids of the decapeptide luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone with a cysteine added to the N-terminus, was synthesized using Fmoc chemistry. The purified peptide (1.35-1.9 eq) was coupled to alpha- bromoacetamidopropyl Perloza in 0.1 M NaHCθ3 solution, pH 8.3, for 1-2 hours. The peptide was anchored to the support via a thioether linkage. Analysis of the peptide-Perloza conjugate indicated near- quantitative displacement of support-bound bromine by the peptide. The peptidic affinity matrix was able to bind ovine antibodies to luteinizing hormone- releasing hormone (LHRH). Thioether immobilization offers directed, chemically stable, high-yield anchoring of synthetic peptides onto a chromatographic support. The high reaction efficiency means there is little waste of valuable synthetic peptide. Beddows CG, Mirauer RA, Guthrie JT, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980, Feb, 22(2):311-21 teach immobilized beta-Galactosidase and other enzymes on p-amino-carbanilated derivatives of cellulose and methylol cellulose using the diazo method and through gluteraldehyde. The p-amino- carbanilated cellulose (CTAC) was used to immobilize beta galactosidase, glucose oxidase, trypsin, pepsin, and papain. Le KD, Gilkes NR, Kilburn DG, Miller RC Jr, Saddler JN, Warren RA, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1994, Jun, 16(6):496-500 produced a fusion protein, Sta-CBDCex, which comprises streptavidin with a cellulose- binding domain (CBDCex) fused to its C Terminus. This fused protein was produced in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli, where it formed inclusion bodies. Renatured Sta-CBDCex, recovered from the inclusion bodies, adsorbed to AVICEL™, a microcrystalline cellulose. The cellulose-bound Sta-CBDCex in turn bound biotinylated alkaline phosphatase or biotinylated beta-glucosidase. The immobilized beta-glucosidase remained fully active during 2 weeks of continuous column operation at 50 °C. Krysteva MA, Yotova LK, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1992, 54(1): 13-8 teach artificial multienzyme complexes which were prepared by covalent binding to polysaccharide structures which have been activated with urea and formaldehyde. In this manner double enzyme complexes of glucose oxidase and catalase, a glucose oxidase and invertase, have been prepared by immobilization onto cellulose fabric. The resulting multienzyme systems were highly active and stable, making them suitable for use in measuring the concentrations of glucose in solutions. Krysteva MA, Blagov SR, Sokolov TT, J. Appl. Biochem. 1984, Oct-Dec, 6(5-6):367-73 teach a variation on the previous method in which cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose are treated consecutively with sodium periodate and urea. The interaction of urea derivatives with formaldehyde results in highly reactive groups, capable of further condensation with the amino acid residues of the proteins. The condensation of chymotrypsin, pepsin, and ovomucoid with such activated matrices has been studied in the pH interval 2 to 10. Differences have been found in the binding properties of basic and acid proteins. Satisfactory values have been obtained concerning the relative enzymatic and inhibitory activity of the immobilized products with respect to high- and low-molecular substrates. Chymotrypsin, immobilized on microcrystalline cellulose matrix, is found to manifest better catalytic properties compared with chymotrypsin immobilized on cellulose matrix. A probable sequence of the stages of chemical activation of the matrices and covalent binding of the proteins to them has been proposed. The main advantages of the proposed method consist of the high reactivity of the binding group in a wide pH range, its suitable length, and its easy synthesis. Vlasov LG, Tolstykh PI, Ignatiuk TE, Razzakov ON, Antibiot Khimioter 1988 Nov, 33(ll):848-50 teach the preparation of immobilized forms of lysozyme by its covalent binding on dialdehyde cellulose and polycaproamide fibers as woven and knitted fabrics respectively. The preparations were estimated by the content of protein and bacteriolytic activity. The lysozyme activity per 1 gram of the carrier and the protein content on dialdehyde cellulose were several times higher than those on polycaproamide while the specific activity of lysozyme on the polycaproamide carrier was somewhat higher than that on dialdehyde cellulose. The effect of the immobilized lysozyme in treatment of purulent wounds was studied on albino rats. It was shown that the periods of the wound healing with the use of the immobilized lysozyme were shorter than those with the use of native lysozyme. Cytological and morphological investigation of the wound wall confirmed the higher efficacy of the lysozyme immobilized forms in treatment of purulent wounds as compared to the use of the native enzyme. Conjugating or fusing a counter moiety having affinity to the matrix of choice to the affinity receptor: Many methods are known in the art to conjugate or fuse (couple) molecules of different types, including peptides. These methods can be used according to the present invention to couple a counter moiety having affinity to the matrix of choice to the affinity receptor selected to recognize a particular microorganism to be concentrated from a sample, to thereby assist in binding (immobilizing) the affinity receptor to the matrix. CBP or CBD or for that matter any other peptide can be conjugated or fused to a receptor using any conjugation method known to one skilled in the art. The peptide can be conjugated to a receptor, for example, an antibody of interest, using a 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionic acid N- hydroxysuccinimide ester (also called N-succinimidyl 3-(2pyridyldithio) propionate) ("SDPD") (Sigma, Cat. No. P-3415), a gluteraldehyde conjugation procedure or a carbodiimide conjugation procedure. The peptide can also be fused to a receptor using recombinant DNA techniques known to one skilled in the art to make fusion proteins, e.g., CBD or CBP fusion proteins. SPDP conjugation: Any SPDP conjugation method known to those skilled in the art can be used. For example, in one illustrative embodiment, a modification of the method of Cumber et al. (1985, Methods of Enzymology 112: 207-224) as described below, is used. A peptide, such as CBD or CBP, (1.7 mg/ml) is mixed with a 10-fold excess of SPDP (50 mM in ethanol) and the receptor is mixed with a 25- fold excess of SPDP in 20 mM sodium phosphate, 0.10 M NaCl pH 7.2 and each of the reactions incubated, e.g., for 3 hours at room temperature. The reactions are then dialyzed against PBS. The peptide is reduced, e.g., with 50 mM DTT for 1 hour at room temperature. The reduced peptide is desalted by equilibration on G-25 column (up to 5 % sample/column volume) with 50 mM KH2PO4 pH 6.5. The reduced peptide is combined with the SPDP -receptor in a molar ratio of 1:10 receptoπpeptide and incubated at 4 °C overnight to form a peptide- receptor conjugate, e.g., CBD-receptor conjugate. Gluteraldehyde conjugation: Conjugation of a peptide (e.g., CBP or CBD) with a receptor can be accomplished by methods known to those skilled in the art using gluteraldehyde. For example, in one illustrative embodiment, the method of conjugation by G.T. Hermanson (1996, "Antibody Modification and Conjugation, in Bioconjugate Techniques, Academic Press, San Diego) described below, is used. The receptor and the peptide, e.g., CBD, (1.1 mg/ml) are mixed at a 10-fold excess with 0.05 % gluteraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate, 0.15 M NaCl pH 6.8, and allowed to react for 2 hours at room temperature. 0.01 M lysine can be added to block excess sites. After-the reaction, the excess gluteraldehyde is removed using a G-25 column equilibrated with PBS (10 % v/v sample/column volumes) Carbodiimide conjugation: Conjugation of a peptide with a receptor can be accomplished by methods known to those skilled in the art using a dehydrating agent such as a carbodiimide. Most preferably the carbodiimide is used in the presence of 4-dimethyl aminopyridine. As is well known to those skilled in the art, carbodiimide conjugation can be used to form a covalent bond between a carboxyl group of peptide and an hydroxyl group of a receptor (resulting in the formation of an ester bond), or an amino group of a receptor (resulting in the formation of an amide bond) or a sulfhydryl group of a receptor (resulting in the formation of a thioester bond). Likewise, carbodiimide coupling can be used to form analgous covalent bonds between a carbogroup of a receptor and an hydroxyl, amino or sulfhydryl group of the peptide. See, generally, J. March, Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reaction's, Mechanism, and Structure, pp. 349-50 & 372-74 (3d ed.), 1985. By means of illustration, and not limitation, the peptide is conjugated to a receptor via a covalent bond using a carbodiimide, such as dicyclohexylcarbodiimide. See generally, the methods of conjugation by B. Neises et al. (1978, Angew Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 17:522; A. Hassner et al. (1978, Tetrahedron Lett. 4475); E.P. Boden et al. (1986, J. Org. Chem. 50:2394) and L.J. Mathias (1979, Synthesis 561). Peptide-receptor fusions: In other specific embodiments, the peptide, such as, CBP or CBD, can be expressed as a fusion, or chimeric protein product, comprising the peptide joined via a peptide bond to a receptor. Such a chimeric product can be made by ligating the appropriate nucleic acid sequences encoding the desired amino acid sequences of the peptide and the receptor to each other by methods known in the art, in the proper coding frame, and expressing the chimeric product by methods commonly known in the art such as a recombinant protein or displayed on a phage. For example, see generally Sambrook et al., 1989, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2nd ed. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York). Alternatively, such a chimeric product or fusion can be made by protein synthesis techniques, e.g., by use of a peptide synthesizer. Methods of concentrating and/or methods of detection: The present invention provides methods of concentrating a particular microorganism(s) of interest in a sample, comprising contacting the sample with a matrix, such as, but not limited to, a cellulosic or chitin matrix, to which is bound an affinity receptor or receptor conjugate, such as, but not limited to, a cellulose binding protein (CBP) - receptor or cellulose binding domain (CBD) - receptor conjugate, specific for the microorganism(s). In a particular embodiment, the sample is a dilute sample containing at least 0.0025 CFU/ml and up to 10 3 CFU/ml of microorganism(s). In other embodiments, the dilute sample contains at least 0.001 CFU/ml, at least 0.008 CFU/ml or <1 CFU/ml. In another embodiment, the present methods for concentrating microorganisms can further comprise washing the matrix to remove unbound materials. In more particular embodiments, the wash solution, for example, can be saline (0.85 % NaCl), phosphate buffered saline (PBS), or PBS with 0. 05 % TWEEN 0 20. Illustrative examples using a washing step are presented in the Examples section that follows. In another embodiment of the present invention, the methods for concentration can further comprise a step for enriching the concentrated microorganism(s) . The enrichment can be performed in situ by addition of culture medium to the matrix and incubation at an appropriate temperature so that captured microorganisms will multiply and optionally be recaptured by the affinity receptor which is bound to the matrix. Illustrative examples of in situ enrichment are presented in the Examples section that follows. In one embodiment, the present methods for concentrating microorganisms can further comprise washing the matrix to remove unbound materials after the capture and enrichment steps, by, foe example, phosphate buffered saline (PBS) optionally supplemented with 0.05 % TWEEN ™ 20. Alternatively, the enrichment of the concentrated microorganism(s) can be performed outside of the immunoconcentrator or in vitro by transferring the microorganisms to culture medium in another container or test tube. In particular embodiments, the culture medium is with or without antibiotics. In a preferred embodiment, the culture medium is without antibiotics. In yet another embodiment, the microorganisms are released from the matrix using any method known in the art, including but not limited to, use of a competing receptor, etc., and then the microorganisms are cultured in vitro in another container or test tube. In another embodiment, the microorganism(s) are captured by a matrix to which is bound an affinity receptor or receptor conjugate, such as, but not limited to, a CBP-receptor- or CBD-receptor-conjugate, optionally enriched in a culture medium, and then detected using an appropriate detection method of choice, as further detailed hereinunder. As exemplified in the Examples section, certain detection methods demonstrate such high sensitivity, e.g. 1-10 CFU's in a volume of less than 1 ml, such that the post capture enrichment step is not essential when these methods are employed for detection. In yet another embodiment, using samples having an extremely low level of microorganisms (less than 20 CFU/25g sample), the sample is pre- enriched for a brief period of 1-5 hours and then the microorganisms are captured with a concentrator, such as a CBP or CBD concentrator ("CBP-C" or "CBD-C") comprising cellulosic or chitin matrix to which is bound a CBP - or CBD - receptor conjugate or fusion, enriched in a culture medium, and then detected using an appropriate detection method of choice. In a more particular embodiment, a CBP or CBD immunoconcentrator ("CBP-IC" or "CBD-IC") is used which comprises a cellulosic or chitin matrix to which is bound a CBP- or CBD-antibody conjugate. Further, the present invention can be performed manually or using methods and devices for automation (See, e.g., Figures 1 and 2). The present invention can further comprise methods for detecting any microorganisms such as, but not limited to, methods of detection selected from immunoassays, polymerase chain reaction, plating the microorganisms on selective media, other nucleic acid signal amplification methods, methods using a biosensor or an electrochemical detector, etc. In one embodiment, the method of the present invention is performed by contacting a sample with a receptor bound matrix in a single pass in which the sample flows through the matrix once in a single direction. Alternatively, the method is performed by contacting a sample using multiple passes. In the multiple pass embodiment, a sample flows through the matrix is "recirculated" and passes through the matrix, i.e., multiple passes in a single direction. In another embodiment, the method of the present invention is performed by contacting a sample with a receptor bound matrix in a single cycle in which the sample is drawn up into the matrix and expelled, thereby, passing over the matrix twice in two directions. Alternatively, the method can be performed using multiple cycles. As illustrated below, the amount of bound microorganisms can be increased by contacting the sample with the receptor bound matrix in multiple cycles. One skilled in the art would know and be able to empirically determine the number of cycles or passes to perform in order to capture the microorganism(s) to concentrate them sufficiently to detect the microorganism(s) . The present methods can be performed using a variety of sample volumes as further illustrated below. For example, the methods of concentration can utilize sample volumes ranging from 1, 20, 250, 650 ml and larger volumes, such as many liters. In a preferred embodiment, the sample volume is 2 ml or less. In another preferred embodiment, the sample volume is 2 ml to 4 liters. In yet another preferred embodiment, the sample volume is 2 ml to 10 liters. For example, liquid samples of 250 ml to 4 L are used from samples such as milk, carcass wash, juices, composite liquid extracts (e.g., stomached samples) and samples of ready to eat foods such as baby foods. In an embodiment of the invention, volumes smaller than 2 ml can be cycled through a receptor bound matrix at least 5 times to achieve nearly 100 % specific capture of the microorganism(s) present in the sample. The steps of the methods of the present invention can be performed in any of a variety of orders. In one embodiment, the microorganisms are captured by a receptor containing concentrator followed by detection of the microorganisms using an appropriate detection method of choice. In another embodiment of the present invention, the method of concentrating a particular microorganism(s) in a sample comprises contacting a sample with a matrix, such as cellulose or chitin matrix, to which is bound a receptor or a receptor conjugate or fusion, such as CBP- receptor or CBD-receptor conjugate or fusion, and enriching the concentrated microorganism(s) with a culture medium with or without antibiotics, and may further comprise performing a method of detecting the microorganism. In any of the above embodiments, the sample can be a liquid extract of a solid sample. In yet another embodiment, the method of concentrating a particular microorganism(s) of interest comprises contacting a liquid with a solid sample to create an extract which is passed through a concentrator according to any of the embodiments described herein. The solid sample can be mixed with a liquid in any way known to those skilled in the art in order to extract microorganisms from the solid sample into the liquid. For example, mixing methods can include, but are not limited to, "stomaching", sonicating and high speed vibrating. The term "stomaching" is a well known term in the field of food microbiology and it means to blend a solid sample with a liquid to obtain a liquid sample which contains a microorganism population representative of the population of microorganisms present in the original sample and which has been extracted, nearly in its entirety into the liquid. For example, the "stomaching" is performed using a device such as the Stomacher Classic 400 Unit (IUL USA Inc., Erlanger, Kentucky). The extract can then be recirculated through the solid sample and through the matrix as many times as desired to concentrate the microorganism(s) . For example, in a more particular embodiment, a solid sample, such as ground beef, is placed in a stomacher bag to which is added a liquid. The liquid and solid sample are mixed or "stomached" in order to form an extract of said sample, said extract containing any microorganism(s) in the solid sample. The extract is passed through a matrix to which is bound an affinity receptor specific for microorganism(s) of interest, e.g., E. coli, etc. The extract flows through the matrix back into the stomacher bag containing the solid sample to further extract more microorganism(s). The extract is recycled as many times as desired through the solid sample and the matrix. By way of example, and not limitation, a solid sample of 20, 25, 50, 65 or 375 grams is extracted with a liquid, e.g. at w/w or vol/vol ratio of about 1:10. The solid and liquid are "stomached" to produce a homogeneous slur. In one embodiment, directly after stomaching, the liquid sample is contacted with a matrix to which is bound an affinity receptor. In another embodiment, the liquid sample obtained after stomaching is pre-enriched for 1-5 hours before contacting the sample with the matrix to which is bound an affinity receptor. Further, in yet another embodiment, the enrichment occurs simultaneously as the liquid sample is contacted with the matrix to which is bound an affinity receptor. Lastly, in an alternative embodiment, the enrichment occurs in the matrix after the microorganisms are captured. In another embodiment, multiple stomacher bags containing homogeneous samples are connected to the same matrix so that larger volumes of liquid sample are used in order to capture the microorganism(s). Prefiltration of samples: The ability to produce samples which have had their solid (particulates) and/or fatty content greatly reduced while retaining nearly 100 % of the bacterial content in the filtrate is an advantageous step in concentrating microorganisms as described herein, chiefly because it prevents clogging and assists in capture. As a direct consequence it is possible to process large volumes of solid and fat containing samples, such as food samples, containing a dilute antigen, such as pathogens. As a result of the prefiltration step these samples can be readily filtered through receptor-coated matrices as described herein, which allow the concentration of antigens, including viable bacterial cells, on the matrix and their subsequent detection. This is especially important when the growth of viable bacteria or the resuscitation of damaged bacterial cells are inhibited by the presence of inhibitory compounds in a sample containing low levels of the organism of interest. The ability to process an entire sample, of large volume, on receptor- coated matrix allows for the capture, concentration and isolation of a large percent of the target cells from the total sample and thus removing such cells from inhibitory compounds and other microflora, enabling their rapid growth and or resuscitation in a non-inhibitory, defined, growth media of choice. The ability to concentrate cells depends on the stickiness (i.e., the extent that the matrix binds to organisms and compounds other than that which the affinity receptor which has been bound to the matrix is specific) and the nominal pore size of the receptor-coated matrix, since for effective concentration the sample solution must be passed through the capture surface while enabling a relatively high percentage of targets to be captured and the subsequent removal of unwanted compounds. Thus, a prefiltration step is preferably employed prior to the implementation of the concentration methods of the present invention. A filter device incorporating a plurality of filter materials has been devised to effect prefiltration according to the present invention. Such a filtering device is directed at removal of fats, starchy materials, proteinaceous materials and particulates while retaining the flora of a filtered sample, e.g., a "stomached" food sample. Historically, removal of fats, starchy materials, proteinaceous materials and particulates involves complex filtration systems in addition to other physical separation means, such as centrifugation, for extracting desired elements of the sample. For optimal results of the concentration methods of the present invention, especially when low level of microorganisms are traced for, or when only small sample volumes are available, it is essential that only a minimal liquid and/or number of target organisms will be lost while prefiltering the sample for the removal of unwanted material. As further detailed hereinunder, the filtering device according to the present invention includes several layers of different types of filtration media, each separate layer, in fact, performs a particular function or functions of the separation process. Several embodiment of the filtering device according to the present invention, which is referred to hereinbelow as device 50, are illustrated in Figures 27a-c. Device 50 according to the present invention includes a housing 52. Housing 52 can be made of two or more integrating parts, so as to enable reuse thereof after replacing some or all of the filters therein. Housing 52 is formed with an inlet 54 and outlet 56 for allowing solutions in and out of device 50 by, for example gravitational force. Housing 52 serves to accommodate a plurality of filter layers each including a dedicated filter material as further detailed below. According to one embodiment, as shown in Figure 27a, three basic filter layers are employed. The order and type of these filter layers may vary with different food types in order to effect the best possible prefiltration for immunoconcentration. One filter layer includes a cotton based non-woven fabric 58. This material is very hydrophilic and acts as a primary absorbent of the sample and also as a depth filter to trap out the larger solids and prevent such solids of progressing beyond to other filter layers. Another filter layer includes a polyester non-woven material 60 which is only slightly hydrophobic and acts both as a second stage solid trap and also as a trap of fatty substances contained in the filtered sample. Still another layer is a slightly hydrophilic polypropylene felt material 62 which provides the final stage of the solid/particulate removal. Being of polypropylene fibres which are inherently hydrophobic, the fibres substantially do not absorb aqueous liquids. Since the liquid content of the sample provides the desired filtrate and is only adsorbed onto the surface of the fibres, the liquid is readily and effectively washed through this final, fine polypropylene filter material with minimal losses. According to another embodiment, as shown in Figures 27b-c, three or four filter layers are employed. One filter layer includes an open cell, reticulated polyurethane foam block (e.g., cylinder) 64, which is designed to retain much of the substantially lipid or fatty content of the sample, starch compounds, as well as to act as a primary separator of the solids content. Another filter layer includes a non-woven filter material 66 which would typically be of polyester or cellulose fibres. The final filtration stage according to this embodiment of the present invention is performed by polypropylene felt material 62, as in the embodiment shown in Figure 27a. A spacer 68 can be employed to create an air space 70 between any of the filters employed. A fourth filter layer is shown in Figure 27c to include a hollow body 72 made of a woven mesh of nylon or polyester fibers. This filter provides a coarse filtration step to remove relatively large solids without providing any significant reduction in flow of liquid through filtering device 50. Applications: The present invention finds uses in various applications, including but not limited to those listed herein below. Food industry: The methods of the present invention can be used to provide rapid food contamination tests for any food-borne microorganism, including, but not limited to, Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Listeria, Campylohacter, Shigella, Staphylococcus, etc. In particular, the microorganism is E. coli 0157:H7. The rapid tests can be used to test any foods, including, but not limited to, meats, fruits, fruit juices, vegetables, vegetable products, dairy products such as milk, grain products and spices. The rapid tests can also be used to test Sponge Rinse fluid which is generated from Cattle, Swine and Turkey Carcass testing as well as the Carcass Rinse fluid generated from the Whole Chicken bird rinse method described by the HACCP procedures (Appendices E-G, 61 Federal Register 38917-38945). Medical industry: The methods of the present invention can be used to provide rapid medical including clinical or veterinary tests for microorganisms, such as bacteria, viruses, fungi such as yeast, protozoans, or nematodes. For example, the present invention can be used to provide a rapid immunoconcentration method for detecting contaminants such as bacteria or viruses in medical products such as plasma, clotting factors, drugs etc. The present invention can also be used in the clinical setting for immunoconcentrating and detecting microorganisms from samples from patients such as stool, as well as body fluids such as blood, urine, saliva and other bodily fluids or solubilized patient samples for use in hospitals or in a doctor's office. For example, the present invention can be used for the rapid detection of urinary tract infections . Environmental industry: The methods of the present invention can be used to provide rapid concentration and detection tests for contamination in environmental samples such as water, waste water or industrial effluent, air (with the aid of an impinger for example), and soil samples. By way of example, and not limitation, the present invention can be used to concentrate and detect water supply contaminants such as Legionella, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, and coliforms. The present invention can also be used to detect microorganism contamination in waste water such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylohacter, etc. Additional objects, advantages, and novel features of the present invention will become apparent to one ordinarily skilled in the art upon examination of the following examples, which are not intended to be limiting. Additionally, each of the various embodiments and aspects of the present invention as delineated hereinabove and as claimed in the claims section below finds experimental support in the following examples. EXAMPLES Reference is now made to the following examples, which together with the above descriptions, illustrate the invention in a non limiting fashion. EXAMPLE 1 Binding of a CBD-conjugate to a cellulose matrix The following example describes the binding of a CBD-IgG conjugate to the cellulose matrix AVICELL™ 200 or to cotton gauze. Materials and methods: Preparation of bacteria: Stock solutions of viable E. coli 0157:H7 bacteria (ATCC No. 43895) were prepared by growing cultures overnight at 37 °C on Tryptic Soy Agar (Difco) slants. Each slant was loaded with 3.0 ml saline solution (0.85 % NaCl) and the media was suspended by mixing using a vortex. The resulting suspension was transferred to a fresh test tube and serially diluted with saline to prepare solutions with the desired bacterial concentrations of 5 x 10 1 , 5 x 10 2 , 5 x 10 3 and 5 x 10 4 CFU/ml (colony forming units). The exact concentration of these solutions was confirmed by plating 50 and 100 μl of the solution estimated to be 5 x 10^ onto Tryptic Soy Agar (Difco) or where indicated onto mENDO agar LES (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Michigan), incubating overnight at 37 °C, and counting the CFU's. Stock solutions of Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC No. 14028) were prepared by growing cultures overnight at 37 °C in Tryptic Soy Broth ("TSB") (Difco) medium with rotation. One part of the overnight culture was diluted with 24 parts fresh TSB and incubated approximately one hour until the optical density at 600 nm (ODgoo) was 0- . This solution was then serially diluted with saline solution (0.85 % NaCl) to the desired concentrations. Antibodies: The antibodies (IgG) used in the following Examples are as follows: Goat anti-E. coli 0157:H7 (Cat. No. 01-95-90) and goat anti-Salmonella CSA-I (Cat. No. 01-91-99) were obtained from KPL (Gaithersburg, Maryland). Rabbit anti-Salmonella sp. antibodies were obtained from Virostat (Maine). Monoclonal (Clone M-32242) anti Salmonella typhimurium antibodies were obtained from, Fitzgerald, Concord, MA). Preparation of a CBD immunoconcentrator (CBD-IC): (a) SPDP conjugation procedure: The cellulose bindmg domain from Clostridium cellulovorans (CBD) was prepared by dissolving the CBD in water at a concentration of 2-3 mg/ml. The SPDP solution is prepared as follows: 5 mg SPDP 3-(2- pyridyldithio) propionic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (also called N- Succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridydithio)propionate) ("SPDP") (Cat. No. P-3415, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Missouri) was dissolved in 300 μl ethanol (50 mM). The SPDP conjugation reactions were performed as follows: 1.7 mg/ml CBD (0.1 μmol) was mixed with a 10 molar excess of SPDP solution (30 μl of 50 mM SPDP in ethanol) and the IgG (2 mg/ml) was mixed with a 25-fold molar excess of SPDP in PBS. The reactions were incubated for 3 hours at room temperature. Phosphate buffered saline ("PBS") (20 mM phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.2) was added to a final volume of 1 ml. The mixture was then dialyzed against PBS. The CBD was reduced with 50 mM dithiothrietol (DTT) for 1 hour at room temperature. The reduced CBD was desalted using a G-25 column (up to 5 % sample/column volume ratio) which was equilibrated with 50 mM KH2PO4, pH 6.5. To produce the CBD-IgG conjugate, the reduced CBD was then mixed with the SDPD-IgG conjugate in a 1:10 molar ratio IgG: CBD and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Conjugation of CBD with IgG was evaluated by (i) binding the conjugate to AVICELL™ 200 in the presence of TWEEN™ 20 (0.05%) (to reduce nonspecific binding); and (ii) an Enzyme Linked Immunosorbant Assay (ELISA) as set forth below. The CBD-IgG conjugate was stored with 0.05 % sodium azide at 4 ° C. ELISA: The Enzyme Linked Immunosorbant Assay was performed as follows: E.I.A./R.I.A. flat bottom, high binding plates (Costar, Cat. No. 3590) were coated with anti-E. coli 0157:H7 1 μg/ml in PBS, by adding 100 μl in each well and incubating for 2 hours at 37 °C. The plates were washed three times with PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20. The plates were blocked using 1 % BSA/PBS by adding 200 μl into each well and incubating for 1 hour at 37 °C. The plates were then washed three times with 0.05% PBS-TWΕΕN ™ 20. E. coli 0157:H7 were added from 0 to lθ6 CFU/ml in PBS-TWΕΕN ™ 20 in 100 μl per well and incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C. The plates were washed three times with PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20. 100 μl of anti-E. coli 0157:H7-HRP were added at a dilution of 1:16,000 in PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20 (0.05 %) and incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C. The plates were washed three times with PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20. 100 μl of K-Blue™ substrate was added and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 μl of 1M H2SO4. The results were determined by reading the absorbance at 450 nm. Preparation of cellulosic matrix: A piece of folded gauze (Nissan, medical gauze, 17 threads per sq. cm. lot 0012) was boiled in 1 % NaHCθ3 1 :15-20 weight per volume for 30 minutes. The gauze was washed four times in distilled water and three times in double distilled water. Each washing was performed by stirring the gauze in water for 15 minutes followed by wringing it and patting on paper before hanging it to dry. Gauze prepared in this fashion was cut into 50 mg quadrants and packed into the bottom end of a pipette tip (QSP, 111-N, white) or concentrator device. Binding of conjugate onto gauze: 150 μl of conjugate (diluted 1 :6 with PBS TWEEN™ 20 to a final concentration of 0.17 mg/ml) was added to the gauze inside the immunoconcentrator device or pipette tip, incubated for 15 minutes at 37 ° C, cooled to room temperature, washed once with 5 ml of PBS-TWEEN™ 20 and then washed with 5 ml of PBS. The immunoconcentrator ("IC") was then ready for use. For a control IC, 150 μl of PBS TWEEN™ 20 was added to gauze without a CBD-IgG conjugate. Binding of conjugate onto A VICELL™ 200: 2 μg CBD-IgG conjugate was applied to 1 mg AVICELL™ 200 (FMC Corp. N. V., Belgium) in PBS-TWEEN™ 20 buffer, and incubated with rotation at room temperature for 1 hour. The remaining buffer was collected and the AVICELL™ was washed three times with PBS. In order to determine the amount of proteins (CBD-IgG conjugate) which were bound to the AVICELL™ the beads were placed in Sample Application Buffer ("SAB") (50 % glycerol, 700 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 20 % SDS, 0.02 % (w/v) Bromophenol Blue, and 375 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.8) and the proteins were released by boiling the AVICELL™ -CBD-IgG mixture. The released proteins were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Samples of the remaining CBD-IgG conjugate mixed with the AVICELL™ 200, the unbound CBD-IgG conjugate, and the bound CBD- IgG conjugate were analyzed using SDS-PAGE (15 % acrylamide). Results: The results of the CBD-IgG conjugate binding to AVICELL™ 200 are shown in Figure 3 which shows that the CBD-IgG conjugate binds to the AVICELL™ cellulose matrix and can be released by boiling the AVICELL™ -CBD-IgG complex in Sample Application Buffer containing β -mercaptoethanol. Lane 2 shows a sample of the conjugate loaded onto the CBD-IgG AVICELL™ 200 and lane 4 shows the CBD-IgG eluted from the AVICELL™ 200 matrix. Lane 3 contains the unbound conjugate (supernatant solution from wash step solutions). EXAMPLE 2 Gluteraldehyde conjugation of CBD-IgG and binding assay to beaded cellulose 50-80 μm The following example describes the conjugation of a CBD to an antibody using gluteraldehyde and the specific binding of the CBD-IgG conjugate to the cellulose matrix of beaded cellulose 50-80 μm. Materials and methods: The CBD from Clostridium cellulovorans was conjugated with affinity purified Goat anti-E. coli 0157:H7 IgG (KPL, Cat. No. 01-95-90) using the following procedure. Goat anti-E. coli IgG (0.9 mg/ml) was mixed with a 10 fold molar excess of CBD (1.1 mg/ml) with 0.05 % gluteraldehyde (Gluteraldehyde 25 % solution, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO; Cat. No. G-5882) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (0.1 M phosphate, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 6.8) for 2 hours at room temperature. L-lysine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; Cat. No. L-6027) was added to a final concentration of 0.01 M as a blocking agent to block excess reactive sites. The CBD-IgG conjugate was purified and the excess gluteraldehyde was removed using a G-25 column equilibrated with PBS (10 % v/v; sample/column volume). The binding assay of the CBD-IgG conjugate was performed by mixing 1 μg of the CBD-IgG conjugate with 10 mg beaded cellulose 50-80 μm (Sigma Chemical. Co., St. Louis, MO) in PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20 and incubating for 1 hour at room temperature. The beaded cellulose was then washed three times with PBS. The amount of bacteria captured was measured by ELISA as follows: To determine the capturing ability of the CBD conjugate adsorbed to the beaded cellulose, E. coli 0157:H7 heat killed standard (0.5 ml at 0, 10 3 , 10^ or 10^ CFU/ml) was added to the matrix and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. The column was washed three times with PBS- TWEEN™ 20. Then 15.6 ng of affinity purified goat anti-E. cø/ι ' -0157:H7- HRP (horseradish peroxidase labeled), 0.1 mg/ml (KPL, Cat. No. 04-95-4) was added and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. The column was washed three times with PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20. 0.2 ml of K-blue™ substrate (Neogen Corp., Lexington, KY) was added and the mixture was incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature in the dark. The substrate was transferred into a fresh tube and 0.2 ml 1M H2SO4 was added. The absorbance was determined with a spectrophotometer at 450 nm. The positive control was E. coli 0157:H7, 7 x lθ9 CFU/ml (KPL, Cat. No. 50- 95-90). Results: The results of this example are illustrated in Figure 4 which shows the bifunctional activity of the CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7 conjugate. The CBD-IgG conjugate bound to the beaded cellulose was still capable of binding the E. coli in the sample. EXAMPLE 3 Evaluation of the specific binding of CBD-conjugate to cellulose The following example illustrates the specific binding of a CBD-goat IgG conjugate to cellulose. The non-specific binding (i.e., removable with a saline detergent solution, e.g., PBS-TWEEN™ 20) of native goat IgG to cellulose is shown for comparison. Materials and methods: 10 mg of cotton gauze were mixed with approximately 15 μg CBD- goat IgG conjugate or native goat IgG in final volume of 0.5 ml PBS- TWEEN™ 20 and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with inversion. The cellulose gauze was washed three times with 1 ml PBS-TWEEN™ 20 and the cellulose gauze was pelleted by centrifugation before each wash step. The supernatant was discarded and the cellulose gauze was resuspended with 50 μl Sample Application Buffer with: β- mercaptoethanol. After boiling for 10 minutes the supernatant was analyzed using 15 % SDS-PAGE (Figure 5a) and 7.5% SDS-PAGE (Figure 5b). Results: The results are illustrated in Figures 5a and 5b which show that in contrast to native IgG (which did not efficiently bind at the concentrations employed), the CBD- IgG conjugate specifically bound to the cellulose matrix (See Figures 5a and 5b, compare lanes 3 and 7). The 15 % gel shows the different IgG fractions i.e., heavy (HC) and light (LC) chains of the CBD-IgG conjugate that were loaded onto the cellulose matrix and that specifically bound. The 7.5 % gel shows the high molecular weight conjugate more clearly than the 15 % gel. EXAMPLE 4 High capture rate of bacteria by cycling sample The following example illustrates the nearly quantitative capture of E. coli 0157:H7 from a 1 ml sample using the CBD immunoconcentration method. The CBD-IC without IgG was used as control. Materials and methods: One milliliter of model PBS solution containing 2.48 x 103 CFU/ml of E. coli 0157:H7 was drawn into the SPDP conjugate CBD-IC by standard action of lab pipettor using either 1 cycle or 5 cycles in an up and down manner. Each cycle took approximately 30 seconds to complete. After completion of the capture cycles, the CBD-IC was washed twice with 4.5 ml PBS. The amount of bacteria captured by the device was calculated by subtracting the amount of bacteria in the wash solutions from the original inoculum number. One ml of expelled model solution was added to 9 ml of wash solution and the bacterial concentration was determined by the membrane filter using GN-6 METRICEL™ (Gelman Sciences Inc., MI) on mENDO agar LES medium and incubated overnight at 37 °C. GN-6 METRICEL™ 0.45 micron membranes are mixed cellulose ester membranes and are used in the isolation and enumeration of bacteria in waste water, drinking water by the Membrane Filtration Technique and other analytical and general laboratory filtration needs. GN-6 METRICEL ™ was used to filter the wash steps during the capture protocol in order to enumerate the number of bacteria which are not captured during the process. The filter is then transferred to a petri dish with mENDO agar LES together with bacteria which have been trapped by the 0.45 micron filter coliforms including E. coli which when grown on this medium produce black colonies that are easily identified on the white background of the METRICEL™ membrane. Results: The results are illustrated in Figure 6 which shows that over 60 % of the bacteria were captured using a single cycle through the CBD-IgG immunoconcentrator, and over 90 % of the bacteria were captured using five cycles through the CBD-IgG immunoconcentrator. EXAMPLE 5 Selective capture of Salmonella typhxmurxum The following example illustrates the selective immunocapture and concentration of Salmonella typhimurium from a 1 ml solution. Materials and methods: Rabbit anti-Salmonella sp. antibodies were obtained from Virostat (Maine) and conjugated to CBD according to the gluteraldehyde procedure as described above. One ml PBS solution containing 1.29 x 10^ CFU/ml was drawn into a CBD-IC by 5 cycles using standard action of lab pipettor in an up and down manner. It took approximately 30 seconds to complete each cycle. After completion of capture cycles the CBD-IC was washed with 2 x 5 ml PBS-TWEEN™ and 2 x 5 ml PBS. The amount of bacteria captured by the device was calculated by subtracting the amount of bacteria in wash solutions from original inoculum number. One ml of expelled model solution was added to 20 ml wash and bacterial concentration was determined by filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ on Xylose Lysine Decarboxylase Agar (XLD: LAB M Ltd., Lancashire, UK) and overnight incubation at 37 °C. Results: The results are illustrated in Figure 7 which shows that the concentrator device with CBD-anti-Salmonella conjugate was able to capture approximately 50 % of the bacteria in a 1 ml sample as compared to less than 12 % capture for a cellulose concentrator device with no CBD- anti-Salmonella conjugate. EXAMPLE 6 Immunoconcentration of bacteria at low concentrations The following example demonstrates the immunoconcentration of low concentrations of bacteria from one milliliter samples. Materials and methods: One ml of PBS solution containing 590, 73, or 6 CFU/ml was drawn into the CBD-IC by standard action of lab pipettor using 2 cycles in an up and down manner. After completion of the capture cycles the CBD-IC was washed twice with 4.5 ml PBS. The amount of bacteria captured by the device was calculated by subtracting the amount of bacteria in wash solutions from original inoculum number. One ml of expelled model solution was added to 9 ml of wash solution and bacterial concentration was determined by filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ or mENDO agar LES medium and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Gauze containing bacteria which have been captured by the CBD-IgG can be plated onto growth media and incubated overnight. Each CFU which was captured will give rise to a distinct "colony" on the gauze itself. These "colonies" grow very rapidly overnight and can spread out quickly covering entire surface of the gauze making it impossible to enumerate CFU's. However, when the number of bacteria which have been captured is less than 25-30 CFU's it is possible to count these "colonies". The sample containing 6 CFU/ml, the matrix was plated directly on mENDO agar LES medium in order to count and confirm the number of bacteria that were captured. Results: The results are illustrated in Figure 8 which shows that the CBD-IgG immunoconcentration method captures 80 % or more of the bacteria. The CBD-IC method can detect as few as 6 CFU/ml from a sample solution. The CBD-IC method has been used to capture as few as 1 CFU/ml and greater than 10^ CFU/ml. Furthermore, the system is indifferent to volumes such that 1 CFU can be placed in large volumes (e.g., 25 or 100 ml to many liters) with the same capture rate as in 1 CFU per 1 ml. EXAMPLE 7 Specificity of immunoconcentration using the CBD immunoconcentration method The following example demonstrates the specificity of immunoconcentration of E. coli 0157:H7 from a 1 ml sample. Materials and methods: One ml of model PBS solution containing 1.77 x 10 3 CFU/ml E. coli 0157:H7 was drawn into a CBD-IC having no CBD-IgG conjugate or CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7 conjugate in five cycles by standard action of lab pipettor in an up and down manner. Each cycle took approximately 30 seconds to complete. After completion of the capture cycles the CBD-IC was washed twice with 4.5 ml of either saline solution (0.85 % NaCl), PBS or PBS-TWEEN™ 20. The amount of bacteria captured by the device was calculated by subtracting the amount of bacteria in wash solutions from number of bacteria in the original inoculum. Bacterial concentration in the wash solution (to which was added 1 ml of expelled model solution) was determined by filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ on mENDO agar LES medium and overnight incubation at 37 °C as described above. Results: The results are illustrated in Figure 9 which shows that saline solution, PBS or PBS-TWEEN™ 20 can be used as a wash solution without affecting the ability of CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7 to bind to the E. coli 0157:H7 in a sample. Moreover, the PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20 wash solution functioned better than the saline or PBS alone to remove nonspecifically bound E. coli. CBDs bind specifically to cellulose in PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20 while most other proteins bind negligibly under these conditions. These conditions effectively eliminate the nonspecific binding of other proteins to the cellulose matrix. Once the CBD-IgG conjugate is bound to the cellulose matrix, the CBD moiety is removed only by the most severe denaturing conditions by 6 M guanidine HCl, 5 M urea or boiling at 100 °C. CBD conjugate that remains bound in the presence of the detergent is most likely to be bound via its CBD moiety and not by the antibody. The antibody is then available to specifically bind to the microorganism(s) in the sample. EXAMPLE 8 Capture and in situ enrichment in CBD-IC The following example illustrates the capture and enrichment of bacteria from a 1 ml pure culture model solution containing 22 CFU of E. co/t ' 0157:H7. Materials and methods: Preparation of model solutions: The pure culture model saline solution containing 22 CFU/ml of E. coli 0157:H7 was prepared by serial dilution of an overnight culture after estimating the concentration of bacteria by measuring absorbance at 650 nm using a spectrophotometer. The final bacterial concentration was determined by filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ on mENDO agar LES medium and incubation overnight at 37 °C as described above. Immunocapture: Bacteria were immunocaptured from the solution by drawing the solution into an immunoconcentrator device (two part plastic device which was machined from white acetal plastic) using a 1 ml standard pipettor. Inoculated solutions were drawn into the device and then expelled by standard pipettor action and repeated so that each sample passed through the device twice. The device was then placed in a rack and disengaged from the pipettor. The CBD-IC was washed once with 5 ml PBS-TWEEN™ 20 and then with 5 ml PBS by passing the wash solution through the device from top to bottom. In certain instances the wash fluid was collected for further analysis by the filter method described above to determine percent of bacteria that were not immunocaptured by the CBD-IC. The percentage of captured bacteria was determined by analyzing certain CBD-ICs by plating the gauze matrix thereof directly onto mENDO agar LES medium and incubating overnight at 37 °C. CBD-IC enrichment procedure: After completion of the wash step, 250 μl of Modified EC (mEC) (Difco) medium (without Novobiocin) which was previously dispensed into sterile plastic tubes, was drawn into the device by standard pipettor action to draw the medium into chamber of the CBD-IC. The tube containing the CBD-IC device was then placed into a 37 °C incubator. After incubation the tube was heated in a heat block to 100 °C for ten minutes to kill the bacteria. The growth media containing the heat killed bacteria were then expelled from the IC by reverse pipettor action and used for an ELISA evaluation. All solutions were tested in duplicate or triplicate for each enrichment time point tested. Results: The results of this example are illustrated in Figure 10 which shows that E. coli 0157:H7 at the low concentration of 22 CFU/ml can be detected with only 4 hours of post capture enrichment. EXAMPLE 9 Detection ofE. coli 0157:H7 in ground beef by ELISA after CBD-IC and in situ enrichment Materials and methods: Eight individual 25 gram samples of minced ground beef (Lot 980302) were inoculated with 1 ml of PBS containing 44 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 and then stomached in 225 ml PBS for 2 minutes. The meat extract samples were filtered through a 100 % cotton fabric filter (manufactured by SPUNTECH Industries, Ltd., Israel) by placing the fabric in a 12 cm diameter funnel and then passing the stomached sample through this filter. The samples were transferred to a reservoir and passed through a CBD-IC. The total time to pass the entire sample through the device was 30 minutes at room temperature. After immunoconcentration the CBD-IC device was detached from sample apparatus and washed twice with 5 ml PBS-TWEEN™ 20 (0.05 %) and twice with 5 ml PBS. 300 μl of mEC medium were placed into a sterile plastic tube for each device. The device was attached to a standard 1 ml pipettor and the medium was drawn into the device which was then detached from the pipettor and placed into the tube for incubation. The sample was incubated at 37 °C for 4 or 5 hours. After incubation, the tubes were placed in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes to kill the bacteria. The device was attached to a pipettor and the medium was expelled into a tube. 200 μl PBS were added to each device and the remaining bacteria were expelled using a pipettor. A total of 400 μl of bacterial solution was recovered from the device and 50 μl samples were used for an ELISA analysis. Results: The results are presented in Figure 11. The two sets of bars represent in situ enrichment times of 4 and 5 hours. This example shows that the CBD-IC is capable of performing immunocapture as well as effective immunoconcentration of E. coli 0157:H7 present in meat samples. Most significant is the ability of the CBD-IC to concentrate pathogen organisms when their concentration is less than 0.2 CFU/ml. EXAMPLE 10 Bacterial capture by cellulose— CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7 conjugate vs. cellulose anti-E. coli 0157:H7 The following example presents a comparison of the binding of E. coli 0157:H7 by cellulose bound CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7 conjugate or cellulose bound anti-E. coli 0157 :H7. Materials and methods: 50 mg of cotton gauze or cellulose beads (ORBICELL™) (Accurate Polymers, Ltd., Illinois) were incubated with CBD-IgG, IgG, or PBS alone each in the presence of TWEEN™ 20 (0.05 %) and washed twice with 10 ml PBS-TWEEN™ 20. One ml of PBS-TWEEN™ 20 containing 800 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 was added to the cellulose matrix, incubated for 5 minutes, and then the textile/beads were washed with 10 ml PBS-TWEEN™ 20 and 10 ml PBS. The washed cellulose as well as all wash solutions were plated on mENDO agar LES plates. Colonies of E. coli 0157:H7 were counted after an overnight incubation of plates at 37 °C. Results: Bacterial capture was calculated as the percentage of the E. coli colonies obtained from wash solutions compared to the initial amount of bacteria passed over the cellulose matrix (% of 0157:H7 bacteria captured Table 7 As shown in Table 7, the cellulose bound CBD-IgG conjugate captured a greater percentage of bacteria as is compared to the cellulose matrix with only native IgG, or PBS-TWEEN™ 20 alone. EXAMPLE 11 Comparison between DYNAL® and CBD immunoconcentrator (CBD-IC) procedures for E. coli 0157 :H7 capture and detection from a meat extract The following example presents a comparison of the capture and isolation of E. coli 0157:H7 by DYNAL® beads and the CBD- immunoconcentrator. Materials and methods: (a) CBD-IC procedure: 25 grams of ground beef were homogenized in 225 ml of PBS using a stomacher. The extract was filtered twice through a cotton fiber (SPUNTECH™-80 g/m). The extracts were inoculated with 0, 20 or 200 CFU of E. coli 0157:H7. The experiment was performed in triplicate for each inoculum level. The 225 ml inoculated extracts were passed through the CBD-anti-E. coli 0157:H7 gauze IC device during a 30 minutes period, and washed with 10 ml of PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20 and then 10 ml of PBS. The washed gauze containing tips were transferred into a 10 ml tube and 120 μl of enrichment mEC medium were drawn into the device followed by a 6 hour incubation at 37 °C. The tubes containing the enriched textile tips were boiled for 10 minutes in a water bath, and then the mEC medium containing bacteria was expelled into an eppendorf tube. The device was then washed once with 120 μl of PBS. The PBS wash was added to the mEC medium to produce a sample adapted for ELISA testing. The presence of E. coli 0157 in 50 μl of the sample (enriched medium and PBS wash) was detected by ELISA using HRPanti-E. coli 0157:H7 (KPL). Optical density of the substrate (K-Blue™, Neogen Corp., Lexington, KY) was measured in an ΕLISA reader. Results are summarized in Figure 12. (b) D YNAL® procedure: The DYNAL® procedure was performed according to manufacturer's protocol as follows: 25 grams of ground beef were extracted using 225 ml of pre-enrichment medium of buffered peptone water ("BPW") (Difco, Cat. No. 1810-17-9) using a stomacher. The extract was inoculated with 0, 20, 200, 1000 or 10,000 CFU similar to the CBD-IC protocol above and incubated for 6 hours at 37 °C in a standard stomacher bag. One ml of enriched meat extract was incubated for 30 minutes with DYNABΕADS™ magnetic anti-E. coli 0157:H7 beads with continuous mixing according to manufacturer's recommended protocol (Dynal-Product No. 710.03; printed 05/97; Rev. No. 01). Tubes containing extract and magnetic beads were placed in a magnetic stand to concentrate beads before each wash step. Beads were washed twice with 1 ml PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20 and the beads were plated on Sorbitol MacConkey Agar (SMAC) and SMAC supplemented with Cefixime and potassium tellurite, 0.05 mg/L and 2.5 mg/L (CT-SMAC), respectively. The plates were incubated 18-24 hours at 37 °C. Since E. coli 0157:H7 does not ferment sorbitol within 24 hours and, therefore, appears as colorless colonies on SMAC and CT-SMAC and are resistant to tellurite and cefixime, the overnight grown colonies were examined for white sorbitol negative (presumptive 0157 positive) vs. red color sorbitol positive (negative-non-0157 colonies). Both white and red colonies were confirmed by Oxoid Latex 0157 agglutination test as 0157 positive or negative, respectively. The Oxoid E. coli 0157 latex test will demonstrate by slide agglutination E. coli strains possessing the 0157 serogroup antigen. One drop of test 0157 latex is mixed with a loop of bacteria from a sorbitol negative colony and rocked gently for one minute to observe whether or not agglutination occurs. Agglutination indicates that the colony was E. coli 0157. Results: No positive colonies were detected, using DYNAL® protocol, in the inoculated samples when inoculum level was 20 and 200 CFU/225 ml extract, as well as in the negative controls which were not inoculated. This is probably due to the fact that more than 300 negative red colonies were captured by DYNAL® beads and, upon plating, appeared in both inoculated and non-inoculated sample plates. This high density of Sorbitol positive red colonies make the identification of presumptive positive nearly impossible when inoculum level was 20 and 200 CFU/per 225 ml (25 g ground beef). However, when inoculum levels of 1000 and 10,000 CFU/225 ml extract (25 g ground beef) were tested, then positive 0157 colonies were identified on CT-SMAC plates which were then confirmed by latex agglutination. Plating of the 0157 bacteria used for inoculum on the CT-SMAC plates resulted in white positive colonies as expected, thus confirming appropriate plating procedure. In contrast the CBD-IC protocol detected E. coli 0157:H7 at all tested levels of inoculum, e.g., 20 and 200 CFU's/225 ml sample. Conclusions: The CBD-IC procedure was able to detect 200 CFU and as low as 20 CFU inoculated E. coli 0157:H7 bacteria from 250 ml meat extract samples as shown in Figure 12 by incorporating a post-capture enrichment procedure.. In contrast, the detection and isolation of 200 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 using the DYNAL® beads procedure was not possible due to the presence of a high background of microflora in the 225 ml samples after 6 hours of pre-enrichment. EXAMPLE 12 Comparison between DYNAL® and CBD-IC for the capture and detection ofE. coli 0157 :H7 using the post immunocapture enrichment procedure The following example describes a comparison between DYNAL® beads and the CBD-IC for the detection of E. coli 0157:H7, ensuing the post immunocapture enrichment procedure. Materials and methods: One ml of meat extract prepared as in the previous Example was inoculated with 40 CFU of E. coli 0157:H7 and loaded on the CBD-anti-E. coli IC gauze device using 5 consecutive cycles, or the sample was incubated with DYNAL®-anti-E. coli 0157 beads. The capture step for both the CBD-IC procedure and the DYNAL® procedure were carried out in 1 minute. The IC was washed in 5 ml of PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20 and 5 ml of PBS. The DYNAL® beads were washed as described in the previous Example using the magnet apparatus. An enrichment step was performed with the IC as described above. The DYNAL® beads were incubated in 120 μl of mEC medium in eppendorff tubes for 5 or 6 hours. The IC samples were treated as in the previous Example. The enriched sample DYNAL® beads was boiled for 20 minutes, followed by addition of 120 μl of PBS. 50 μl of the DYNAL® sample were tested for E. coli 0157 as described for the IC. The capture capabilities (% of 0157:H7 bacteria captured from total present in 1 ml meat extract sample) of the CBD-IC and the DYNAL® beads were also determined by removing the gauze from the CBD-IC device after the wash step, and plating the gauze or DYNAL® beads onto CT-SMAC plates. Positive white colonies present after an overnight incubation at 37 °C were counted. Presumptive positives were confirmed by the Oxoid agglutination test. Determination of captured bacteria was performed in triplicate and in parallel to the above in situ enrichment. Results: The results of this example show that the DYNAL® DYNABEADS ® were less effective at detecting E. coli 0157:H7 from 1 ml of an inoculated meat extract then the CBD-IC, as shown using the post-capture in situ enrichment and ELISA procedure (see Figure 13); and also by plating of the textile matrix and the DYNAL® DYNABEADS® beads after the wash step. The capture capabilities (% of 0157:H7 bacteria captured from 40 CFU present in 1 ml meat extract sample) of the CBD-IC was 38-58 % of the total bacteria which was much higher than the capture percent of 17-27 % for the DYNAL® DYNABEADS® beads. EXAMPLE 13 Comparison of the capture ofE. coli 0157 in milk by the DYNAL® method and the CBD-IC method The following example describes a comparison of capturing E. coli 0157:H7 from milk samples between the DYNAL® DYNABEADS® and CBD-IC methods. Materials and methods: (a) CBD-IC procedure: 200 CFU of E. coli 0157:H7 were inoculated into 1 ml samples of fresh homogenized milk having 1 %, 2 %, and 3 % fat. The milk samples were drawn into CBD-IC in 5 cycles by standard action of lab pipettor in an up and down manner. Each cycle took approximately 30 seconds to complete. After completion of the capture cycles the CBD-IC was washed with 4.5 ml of PBS-TWEEN™ 20 and then 4.5 ml of PBS. The amount of bacteria captured by the device was calculated by subtracting the amount of bacteria in the wash solutions from the number of bacteria in the original inoculum. The bacterial concentration in the wash solutions (to which 1 ml of expelled model solution was added) was determined by filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ on mENDO agar LES medium incubated at 37 °C. (b) DYNAL © DYNABEADS® beads procedure: 200 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 were inoculated into 1 ml samples of fresh homogenized milk having 1 %, 2 %, and 3 % fat. E. coli 0157:H7 bacteria were captured from the milk samples by Immunomagnetic Separation as described in the DYNAL® DYNABEADS® beads anti-E. coli 0157 protocol. In brief, each 1 ml of spiked milk sample was incubated for 30 minutes with DYNAL® magnetic anti-E. coli 0157:H7 DYNABEADS®, and then washed twice with PBS-TWEEN™ 20 while using the magnet to concentrate the beads onto the side of the tube before each wash step. The beads were then plated on SMAC selective agar plates in order to enumerate the number of captured bacteria. Results: The results of this example are set forth in Figure 14. The CBD-IC method is indifferent to the percent fat present in different milk samples as exhibited by the high percent capture of E. coli 0157:H7 in the samples with 1 %, 2 % and 3 % fat. The DYNAL® DYNADEADS® method displayed a certain degree of difficulty in carrying out the manufacturers protocol due to poor concentration of beads by the action of the magnet in samples with 3 % fat and to a lesser degree in samples having 2 % fat. Beads in these samples tended to collect at the bottom of the eppendorf tube despite the magnetic effect on the beads thereby making it difficult to recover the beads during the wash steps. Nevertheless, DYNAL® beads did capture E. coli 0157:H7 in the milk samples at all fat concentrations although at a lower efficiency than the CBD-IC method. EXAMPLE 14 Detection ofE. coli 0157.-H7 in milk by ELISA after CBD-IC and in situ enrichment The following example describes the ELISA detection of E. coli 0157:H7 captured from 1 % fat UHT long life homogenized and 3% fat fresh homogenized milk samples by CBD-IC followed by in situ enrichment. Materials and methods: 5 CFU or 60 CFU of E. coli 0157:H7 were inoculated into 250 ml samples of 1 % Fat UHT long life homogenized milk and 30 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 were inoculated into 250 ml samples of 3 % fat fresh homogenized milk. The milk samples were passed through a CBD-IC by gravity. The total time to pass the entire sample through the device was 25 minutes at room temperature. After immunoconcentration the device was detached from the sample reservoir apparatus and washed twice with 5 ml PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20 (0.05 %) and twice with 5 ml PBS. 120 μl of mΕC medium were placed into a sterile plastic tube for each device. The device was attached to standard 1 ml pipettor and the medium was drawn into device from the tube. The device was then detached from the pipettor and placed into the tube for incubation. The incubation was carried out for five hours at 37 °C. After incubation, the tubes were placed in a boiling water bath for ten minutes to kill the bacteria therein. The device was reattached to the pipettor and the medium was expelled back into a tube. 120 μl of PBS were then drawn into the device in order to expel and pool the remaining bacteria. A total of 200 μl of the bacterial solution was recovered from the device and 50 μl used for ΕLISA analysis as described above. Results: The results of the example are set forth in Figures 15 and 16. The control sample was not spiked with bacteria. Figure 15 shows that the CBD-IC was able to concentrate the bacteria from 1 % fat milk samples following in situ enrichment when the inoculum was 60 CFU per 250 ml (the numbers of bacteria in the enriched sample are in Figure 15 above the sample bar). However, when 5 CFU were inoculated into 250 ml 1 % fat milk E. coli 0157:H7 was detected in only one of three samples. The negatives may have been due to poor distribution of the bacteria in the inoculum, resulting in samples which were not spiked, or may be due to lack of capture of the few CFU's present. Figure 16 shows that the CBD-IC was able to concentrate bacteria from a sample of 3 % fat milk samples. Following in situ enrichment the bacteria were detectable by ELISA (the number of bacteria in the enriched sample is above sample bar in Figure 16). The CBD-IC method can be used to capture and concentrate E. coli 0157:H7 from large volume samples such as 250 ml of milk having 1 % and 3 % fat. EXAMPLE 15 Capture ofE. coli 0157 :H7 from ground meat extract: pre-enrichment, CBD-IC and in situ enrichment The following example describes the capture of E. coli 0157:H7 from ground beef samples that were pre-enriched, concentrated and enriched in situ. Materials and methods: Twenty grams of beef samples were diluted in a standard stomacher bag with 225 ml mΕC and were stomached for 2 minutes. The extract was then filtered twice through a cotton filter (SPUNTECH) and spiked with either 2 CFU of 7 CFU E. coli 0157:H7. For the control, meat samples without E. coli 0157:H7 were used. All treatments were carried out in triplicate. The extract samples were pre-enriched by incubating them for 3 hours at 37 °C and then passing them through a CBD-IC at a rate of approximately 7 ml per minute. After immunoconcentration the CBD-IC device was detached from the sample reservoir apparatus and was washed twice with 5 ml of PBS-TWEEN™ 20 (0.05 %) and twice with 5 ml of PBS. 120 μl of mEC medium was placed into a sterile plastic tube for each device. The device was attached to a standard 1 ml pipettor and the medium was drawn into the device from the tube. The device was then detached from the pipettor and placed into the tube for incubation. The tube was incubated at 37 °C for 5 hours. After incubation, the tubes were placed in a boiling water bath for ten minutes to kill the bacteria therein. The device was reattached to a pipettor and the medium was expelled back into the tube. 120 μl of PBS were drawn into each device in order to expel and pool the remaining bacteria. 50 μl of this solution containing bacteria was analyzed by ELISA as described above. Results: The results of the example are set forth in Figure 17. Extremely low concentrations of bacteria were isolated and detected from meat samples by pre-enrichment followed by immunoconcentration using the CBD-IC device, and in situ enrichment. This process was carried out entirely without the use of selective reagents such as antibiotics. EXAMPLE 16 Capture ofE. coli 0157:H7 by a maltose binding protein (MBP)-antibody conjugate - small volume The following example demonstrates that microorganisms can be captured onto an amylose coated matrix by a MBP-antibody conjugate. Materials and Methods: Preparation of an immunoconcentrator employing maltose binding protein-antibody conjugate (MBP-Ab-IC): (i) SPDP Conjugation procedure: 1.8 mg MBP (6.0 mg/ml, Maltose Binding Protein-New England Biolabs, Inc. Product No. 800-44L) were mixed with 20-fold molar excess of SPDP (68 mM, MW 312.4 g/mol, N-Succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio) propionate, Cat. No. P-3415, Sigma) in ethanol. Similarly, 2.2 mg IgG (1.5 mg/ml, KPL, affinity purified antibody Goat anti-E. coli 0157:H7, Cat. No. 95-90-10, Lot No. TH077) were mixed with 25-fold molar excess of SPDP (68 mM) in ethanol for two hours at room temperature. Thereafter both reactions were dialyzed against PBS, overnight, at 4 °C, and the precipitates were spun down. The IgG was then reduced by addition of 1 M DTT to a final concentration of 50 mM and incubated for one hour at room temperature. The reduced IgG was then desalted on Sephadex G-25 column (up to 5 % sample/column volume ratio) by equilibration with 50 mM KH2PO4, pH 6.5. The reduced SPDP-IgG was mixed with the SPDP-MBP in molar ratio of 1:2.9 IgG:MBP at 4 °C overnight. The precipitate was spin down and stored at 4 °C until use. (ii) Preparation ofamylose coated gauze matrix: 1.3 grams of amylose (Corn Practical grade: Approximately 70 %, Cat. No. A-7043, Sigma) per 100 ml of distilled water were dissolved and boiled. 50 mg pre-cut gauze quadrants were added to the boiling amylose solution. 1-2 minutes later amylose coated gauze quadrants were removed from the boiling amylose solution and were air dried at room temperature. Excess amylose was then washed from the gauze by submerging the coated gauze in 1 liter of Tris buffer pH 7.4 at 60 °C, washing 5 minutes with a stirrer and repeating the wash step two more times, each time using a fresh buffer. Finally, each individual quadrant was washed with 1 ml Tris buffer pH 7.4 and air dried at room temperature. Preparation of a MBP-Ab-IC capture cartridge: NaCl was added to the MBP-Ab conjugate to a final concentration of 0.2 M. For control, MBP was dialyzed against 50 mM KH2PO4, pH 6.5, with 0.2 M NaCl and then diluted with the same buffer to a final concentration of 0.1 mg/ml. 150 μl of conjugate (MBP-Ab, final concentration 0.1 mg protein/ml as determined by the Bradford method) or MBP alone was added onto a gauze prepacked into a cartridge, incubated for 15 minutes at 37 °C, cooled to room temperature and washed twice with 5 ml of PBS. The MBP-Ab-IC and MBP-IC were then ready for use. Capture and wash step: One ml of PBS containing 100 CFU's E. coli 0157:H7 was drawn into the MBP-Ab-IC or the MBP-IC by standard action of lab pipettor, 5 cycles, in an up and down manner. Following the capture step, the cartridge was washed with 10 ml PBS solution. The amount of bacteria captured by the device was calculated by subtracting the amount of bacteria in wash solutions from original inoculum number. One ml of expelled model solution was added to 10 ml wash solution and bacterial concentration was determined by a filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ (Gelman Sciences Inc., MI) on mENDO agar LES medium and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Experimental Results: The results of the example are set forth in Figure 18. These results show that MBP-Ab bound to amylose coated fabric can be used to capture E. coli 0157:H7 from model solutions. EXAMPLE 17 Capture ofE. coli 0157:H7 by a maltose binding protein (MBP)-antibody conjugate - large volume The following example demonstrates that microorganisms present at low concentrations (140 CFU/250 ml) can be captured and concentrated on an amylose coated matrix by a MBP-antibody conjugate. Materials and Methods: MBP-Ab-IC was prepared as described in the Example above. For control, amylose coated matrix was used without MBP-Ab complex. Capture and wash step: 250 ml of PBS containing 140 CFU's E. coli 0157:H7 were passed through MBP-Ab-IC or control IC by gravity at a flow rate of 8 ml per minute. Following the capture step, the cartridge was washed with 10 ml PBS solution and this solution was combined with the 250 ml flow through solution. The amount of bacteria captured by the device was calculated by subtracting the amount of bacteria in flow through and wash solutions, combined, from the original inoculum number. The number of CFU in these solutions was determined by filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ on mENDO agar LES medium and overnight incubation at 37°C Experimental Results: The results of the example are set forth in Figure 19. These results show that MBP-Ab bound to amylose coated fabric can be used to capture and concentrate E. coli 0157:H7 from model solutions when target bacteria are present at low concentrations in large volume samples. EXAMPLE 18 Capture ofE. coli 0157 :H7 from 25 ml PBS by a CBD-antibody cellulose beads complex The following example demonstrates that microorganisms can be captured on cellulose bead matrix by a CBD-antibody conjugate. Materials and Methods: Preparation of a CBD-IC cellulose beads capture cartridge: 25 μl CBD-IgG conjugate prepared as described in Example 1 above were diluted to 200 μl with PBS and added to 100 mg of ORBICELL™ beads (45-75 μm, non-porous, Accurate Polymers, Ltd.) or VISKASE® beads (VISKASE® - Applied Technologies Group - spherical cellulose beads- wide diameter range approx. 30-200 μm, non-porous) and incubated for 1 hour with inversion at room temperature. The beads were then loaded into a 1 ml column with a frit at the bottom and then washed with 5 ml PBS. Capture and wash step: 25 ml of PBS containing 52 CFU or 110 CFU E. coli 0157:H7 for ORBICELL™ and VISKASE®, respectively, were loaded into a 50 ml reservoir and then passed through the CBD-Ab cellulose bead column. Following the capture step, the cartridge was washed with 5 ml PBS-TWEEN™ 20 (0.05 %) and then with 7 ml PBS solution. The beads were then removed from the column with 1 ml PBS, which was then plated together with the beads directly onto mENDO agar LES for overnight incubation and plate count. The amount of bacteria captured by the device was calculated by counting the number of colonies that grew on the plates containing the beads as well as by subtracting the amount of bacteria in wash solutions from original inoculum number. The 12 ml wash solutions were collected and bacterial concentration was determined by filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ on mENDO agar LES medium and overnight incubation at 37 °C. Experimental Results: The results of the example are set forth in Figure 20, demonstrating that CBD-Ab-ORBICELL™ and CBD-Ab-VISKASE® complexes capture and concentrate E. coli 0157:H7 from PBS model solutions. There is a discrepancy between the number of bacteria captured by VISKASE® beads as determined by subtracting non-captured from input as opposed to CFU that grew on plated beads. The reason for this is unknown but it may be due to more than 1 bacteria being captured to a single bead. The exact size of these beads is unknown but the range is much greater than the ORBICELL ™ beads and includes beads of up to 200 μm. These results show that CBD-Ab bound to cellulose beads can be used to capture and concentrate bacteria from dilute solutions of target microorganisms. EXAMPLE 19 Detection of Salmonella typhimurium in meat extracts at different spike levels The following example illustrates the selective immunocapture and concentration of Salmonella typhimurium from meat extracts. Materials and methods: Preparation of a CBD-IC capture cartridge: 50 mg cotton gauze was packed into a CBD-IC cartridge and then 150 μl of a solution containing CBD-anti Salmonella sp. gluteraldehyde conjugate (Lot. No. GM-980719) diluted 1 :6 in PBS was loaded into the cartridge, incubated for 15 minutes at 37 °C, cooled to room temperature and washed twice with 5 ml of PBS-TWEEN ™ 20 and then washed twice with 5 ml of PBS. Capture and detection: 25 grams of ground beef samples (Lot. No. SC 73098) were diluted with 225 ml PBS (to yield total extract volume of about 250 ml) and stomached for 2 minutes. The stomached samples were filtered through a SPUNTECH filter and then 200 ml extract aliquots were spiked with 200, 100, 50, 15 or zero CFU (duplicates at each level) of Salmonella typhimurium. The spiked samples were passed through a CBD-IC anti Salmonella sp. device. The CBD-IC was then washed with 10 ml PBS- TWEEN™ 20 and then with 10 ml PBS. 120 μl of M-Broth without Novobiocin was added to the device and Salmonella was enriched by incubation at 37 °C for six hours. After amplification the sample was boiled to kill the captured bacteria and thereafter expelled into a collection tube. Additional 120 μl PBS were added, expelled and pooled with the previous portion in the collection tube. ELISA was performed on the pooled sample, 50 μl per well, using Monoclonal (Clone M-32242) anti Salmonella Typhimurium. As controls served meat extracts without spike. Experimental results: The results of the example are set forth in Figure 21 demonstrating that for spike levels equal or greater than 50 CFU per 250 ml beef extract, all trials were positive. However, at 15 CFU per 250 ml beef extract only one of the three trials resulted in a positive ELISA assay. These results demonstrate that the CBD-IC can be used to capture, concentrate and detect Salmonella sp. when these organisms are found at extremely low concentrations in highly particulated food samples. EXAMPLE 20 Sensitivity of CBD-IC for S. typhimurium with one hour pre-enrichment step The following example illustrates the selective immunocapture and concentration of Salmonella typhimurium from meat extracts following brief pre-enrichment. Materials and methods: Capture and wash step: 225 ml buffered peptone water were added to 25 grams of ground beef (Lot. No. Rub 81398) which was then stomached for one minute using a SEWARD 400 stomacher. The stomached beef sample was then filtered through a cotton filter (SPUNTECH cotton) and the extract was inoculated with 28, 14, 7 or zero CFU's S. typhimurium and, pre-enriched for 1 hour at 37 °C and then passed through CBD-IC anti-Salmonella device (prepared as described above). Following the capture step, the cartridge was washed once with 10 ml PBS-TWEEN™ 20 (0.05 %) and then with 10 ml of PBS from top to bottom. 120 μl of M-Broth without Novobiocin was added to the device and the Salmonella were enriched at 37 °C for seven hours. After enrichment the sample was boiled and expelled into a collection tube. Additional 120 μl PBS were added, expelled and pooled with the previous portion in the collection tube. ELISA was performed on the pooled sample, 50 μl per well, using Monoclonal (Clone M-32242) anti Salmonella Typhimurium. Controls were meat without spike. Results: The results of the example are set forth in Figure 22, demonstrating that Salmonella Typhimurium can be captured, concentrated and detected for spike levels as low as 7 CFU per 225 ml beef extract. These results demonstrate that the CBD-IC can be used to capture, concentrate and detect Salmonella sp. When these organisms are found at extremely low concentrations in highly particulate food samples and that sensitivity can be enhanced by incorporating a short pre-enrichment step using a non-specific growth medium. EXAMPLE 21 Capture and detection ofE. coli 0157 :H7 in 1 ml PBS samples using polyester bound IgG The following example illustrates the selective immunocapture and concentration of E. coli 0157:H7 from 1 ml PBS using IgG bound to polyester matrix. Materials and methods: Preparation of a polyester IgG-IC capture cartridge: 15 mg polyester hydrophobic synthetic polymer foam (Dec 632/45 ppi reticulated polyester 23-27 Kg/M 3 density, Recticel Declon, UK) were packed into an IC cartridge (6 mm in diameter x 10 mm) and then 150 μl of a solution containing or 40 μg anti E. coli 0157:H7 goat antibodies in PBS (IgG-IC) were loaded into the cartridge and incubated at room temperature either overnight or for one hour and washed three times with 1 ml of PBS. Capture and Detection: One ml of PBS containing 91 CFU's E. coli 0157:H7 was drawn into the IgG-IC by standard action of lab pipettor, 5 cycles, in an up and down manner. Following the capture step, the cartridge was washed with 10 ml PBS solution. The amount of bacteria captured by the device was calculated by subtracting the amount of bacteria in wash solutions from original inoculum number. One ml of expelled model solution was added to 10 ml wash and bacterial concentration was determined by filter method using GN-6 METRICEL on mENDO agar LES medium and overnight incubation at 37 °C. Enrichment: For each device, 150 μl of mEC medium were placed into a sterile plastic tube. The device was attached to a standard 1 ml pipettor and the medium was drawn into the device from the tube. The device was then detached from the pipettor and placed into the tube for incubation. Incubation was carried out at 37 °C for a period of 5.5 hours. After incubation, each device was placed in a boiling bath for ten minutes to kill the bacteria. The device was then reattached to the pipettor and the medium was expelled back into the tube. 100 μl of PBS were drawn into the device in order to expel and pool the remaining bacteria. A total of 200 μl of bacterial solution was recovered from the device and 50 μl were then used for ELISA analysis. Experimental results: The results of the example are set forth in Figures 23a-b, demonstrating that the polyester hydrophobic synthetic polymer foam can be used to immunocapture, enrich and detect E. coli 0157:H7 when these organisms are found at low concentrations in model solutions. EXAMPLE 22 Capture and detection ofE. coli 0157 :H7 in 1 ml PBS samples using polyester bound polyester bound anti 0157:H7 IgG The following example illustrates the selective immunocapture and concentration of E. coli 0157:H7 from 1 ml PBS using IgG bound to polyester matrix. Materials and methods: Preparation of a polyester IC cartridge: 50 mg CELLONA® (100 % polyester padding, Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG, Neuwied, Germany) were packed into an IC cartridge (15 mm x 30 mm) and then 150 μl of a solution containing 40 μg anti E. coli 0157:H7 goat antibodies in PBS were loaded into the cartridge (IgG-IC) and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Then, each device was washed three times with 1 ml of PBS. Capture and detection: 1 ml of PBS containing 113 CFU's E. coli 0157:H7 was drawn into the IgG-IC by a standard action of a lab pipettor, 5 cycles, in an up and down manner. Following the capture step, the cartridge was washed with 10 ml PBS solution. The amount of bacteria captured by the device was calculated by subtracting the amount of bacteria in the wash solutions from the original inoculum number. One ml of expelled model solution was added to 10 ml wash solution and the bacterial concentration was determined by a filter method using GN-6 METRICEL™ on mENDO agar LES medium and overnight incubation at 37 °C. Enrichment: For each device, 150 μl of mEC medium were placed into a sterile plastic tube. The device was attached to a standard 1 ml pipettor and the medium was drawn into the device from the tube. The device was then detached from the pipettor and placed into the tube for incubation. Incubation was carried out at 37 °C for a period of 5 hours. After incubation, each device was placed in a boiling bath for ten minutes to kill the bacteria. The device was then reattached to the pipettor and the medium was expelled back into the tube. 100 μl of PBS were drawn into the device in order to expel and pool the remaining bacteria. A total of 200 μl of bacterial solution was recovered from the device and 50 μl were then used for ELISA analysis. Results: The results of the example are set forth in Figure 24, demonstrating that a high percentage, 50 %, of the 113 CFU present in the 1 ml of the model PBS solution were captured. These results demonstrate that the synthetic polyester polymer CELLONA® can be used to immunocapture E. coli 0157:H7 cells when these organisms are found at low concentrations in a model solution. EXAMPLE 23 Capture and detection ofE. coli 0157 :H7 in 250 ml modified Buffered Peptone Water (mBPW) samples using polyester bound anti 0157:H7 IgG The following example illustrates the selective immunocapture and concentration ofE. coli 0157:H7 from 250 ml mBPW using IgG bound to a polyester matrix. Materials and methods: Preparation of a polyester IgG-IC capture cartridge: 50 mg CELLONA® (100 % polyester padding, Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG, Neuwied, Germany) were packed into an IC cartridge (15 mm x 30 mm) and then 150 μl of a solution containing 20 μg anti E. coli 0157:H7 goat antibodies (IgG, KPL, affinity purified antibody Goat anti-E. coli 0157:H7 Cat. No. 95-90-10, Lot No. TH077) in PBS were loaded into the cartridge (IgG-IC) and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Then, each device was washed three times with 1 ml of PBS. For control 50 mg CELLONA® polyester incubated with PBS alone was used. Capture and wash step: 225 ml mBPW (BACTO® Modified Buffered Peptone Water: Difco Laboratories, Detroit MI) were inoculated with 91 CFU's of E. coli 0157:H7 and then passed through the cartridges by a gravity pass over 30 minutes. Following the capture step, the cartridge was washed twice with 5 ml of PBS. Enrichment: For each device, 150 μl of mEC medium were placed into a sterile plastic tube. The device was attached to a standard 1 ml pipettor and the medium was drawn into the device from the tube. The device was then detached from the pipettor and placed into the tube for incubation. Incubation was carried out at 37 °C for a period of 5 hours. After incubation, each device was placed in a boiling bath for ten minutes to kill the bacteria. The device was then reattached to the pipettor and the medium was expelled back into the tube. 100 μl of PBS were drawn into the device in order to expel and pool the remaining bacteria. A total of 200 μl of bacterial solution was recovered from the device and 50 μl were then used for ELISA analysis. Results: The results of the example are set forth in Figure 25, demonstrating that 15 % of the 91 CFU which were present in the 250 ml sample were captured by IC. These results demonstrate that the synthetic polyester polymer can be used to immobilize capture agents in order to concentrate, enrich and detect E. coli 0157:H7 when these organisms are found at extremely low concentrations in large volumes of the model solution. EXAMPLE 24 Concentration and detection ofE. coli 0157:H7 in ground beef extracts using polyester bound anti 0157 :H7 IgG The following example illustrates the selective immunocapture and concentration of E. coli 0157:H7 from 225 ml ground beef extracts using IgG bound to a polyester matrix. Materials and methods: Preparation of a polyester IC capture cartridge: 50 mg CELLONA® (100 % polyester padding, Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG, Neuwied, Germany) were packed into an IC cartridge (15 mm x 30 mm) and then 150 μl of a solution containing 20 μg anti E. coli 0157:H7 goat antibodies (IgG, KPL, affinity purified antibody Goat anti-E. coli 0157:H7 Cat. No. 95-90-10, Lot No. TH077) in PBS were loaded into the cartridge (IgG-IC) and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Then, each device was washed three times with 1 ml of PBS. For control 50 mg CELLONA® polyester incubated with PBS alone was used. Capture and wash step: 225 ml mBPW (BACTO® Modified Buffered Peptone Water: Difco Laboratories, Detroit MI) were added to 25 grams of ground beef which was then stomached for one minute using a SEWARD 400 stomacher. The stomached beef sample was then filtered through a cotton filter (SPUNTECH™ cotton) and the extract was inoculated with 0 CFU or 136 CFU's of E. coli 0157:H7 and then passed through the cartridges by a gravity pass over 30 minutes. Following the capture step, the cartridge was washed twice with 5 ml of PBS TWΕΕN™ 20 (0.05 %). Enrichment: For each device, 150 μl of mΕC medium were placed into a sterile plastic tube. The device was attached to a standard 1 ml pipettor and the medium was drawn into the device from the tube. The device was then detached from the pipettor and placed into the tube for incubation. Incubation was carried out at 37 °C for a period of 5 hours. After incubation, each device was placed in a boiling bath for ten minutes to kill the bacteria. The device was then reattached to the pipettor and the medium was expelled back into the tube. 100 μl of PBS were drawn into the device in order to expel and pool the remaining bacteria. A total of 200 μl of bacterial solution was recovered from the device and 50 μl were then used for ΕLISA analysis. Results: The results of the example are set forth in Figure 26, demonstrating that a portion of the 136 CFU present in the meat extract were captured and amplified during the 5 hour incubation period, whereas the matrix is specific and that the sample itself is negative. These results demonstrate that the synthetic polyester polymer can be used to immobilize capture agents in order to concentrate, enrich and detect E. coli 0157:H7 when these organisms are found at extremely low concentrations in large volumes of meat extract solutions containing particulate matter. EXAMPLE 25 Capture and concentration ofE. coli 0157:H7 at low concentrations in 225 ml modified Buffered Peptone Water (mBPW) samples using CBD- anti-0157:H7 IgG The following example illustrates the selective immunocapture and concentration of E. coli 0157:H7 present at low concentrations in 225 ml mBPW using CBD-anti-0157:H7 IgG bound to a gauze matrix. Capture and wash step: 225 ml mBPW (BACTO® Modified Buffered Peptone Water: Difco Laboratories, Detroit MI) were inoculated with between 1-9 CFU's of E. coli 0157:H7 or between 10 and 19 CFU's and then passed through cartridges by a gravity pass over 30 minutes. Following the capture step, the each cartridge was washed twice with 5 ml PBS-TWΕΕN™ 20 and then with 5 ml PBS by passing the wash solution through the device from top to bottom. The wash fluid was collected and added to the 225 ml flow through and further analyzed by the filter method described above to determine percent of bacteria that were not immunocaptured by the CBD-IC. The percentage of captured bacteria was determined by plating the gauze matrix directly onto mΕNDO agar LΕS medium and incubating overnight at 37 °C followed by counting CFU's which formed. Results: The results of the example are set forth in Table 8, demonstrating that in 78 % of the samples which contained between 1-9 CFU's per 225 ml and in 100 % of the samples which contained between 10-19 CFU's per 225 ml at least 1 CFU was captured by the CBD-IC device. These results demonstrate that the CBD-IC device can be used to capture E. coli 0157:H7 found at low concentrations in large volumes of model media solution in order to concentrate the pathogen for further analysis. Table 8 Positive defined as at least 1 CFU captured on matrix Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims. All publications cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A method of concentrating a particular microorganism or microorganisms in a sample, the method comprising the step of contacting said sample with a cellulosic or chitin matrix to which is bound a cellulose binding protein (CBP) -receptor or cellulose binding domain (CBD) - receptor conjugate specific for said microorganism or microorganisms. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said sample contains from at least 0.008 CFU/ml to about 10 3 CFU/ml of the microorganism or microorganisms. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said sample contains from at least 0.001 CFU/ml to about 10 3 CFU/ml of the microorganism or microorganisms. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said sample contains from at least 0.00025 CFU/ml to about 10 3 CFU/ml of the microorganism or microorganisms. 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of washing said matrix to remove unbound material from said matrix. 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of enriching the concentrated microorganism or microorganisms in situ by addition to said matrix of a culture medium with or without antibiotics. 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the culture medium is without antibiotics. 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of performing a method of detecting any microorganisms that bind to said CBP-receptor or CBD-receptor conjugate bound to said matrix. 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the method of detecting any microorganisms is an immunoassay, or a nucleic acid signal amplification method. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the nucleic acid signal amplification method is a polymerase chain reaction. 11. The method of claim 1, wherein said matrix is a cellulose fabric or thread, cellulose beads or chitin beads, or a cellulose sponge or thread. 13. The method of claim 11, wherein said cellulose fabric is gauze. 14. The method of claim 1, wherein said sample is contacted with said matrix in a single pass. 15. The method of claim 1, wherein said sample is contacted with said matrix in a single cycle. 16. The method of claim 1, wherein said sample is contacted with said matrix in more than one cycle. 17. The method of claim 1, wherein said sample is in a volume of 2 ml or less. 18. The method of claim 1, wherein said sample is in a volume of 2 ml to 4 liters. 19. The method of claim 1, wherein said sample is in a volume of 2 ml to 10 liters. 20. The method of claim 1, wherein said cellulose binding domain is obtainable from a bacterial, fungal, slime mold, or nematode protein or polypeptide. 21. The method of claim 1 , wherein said cellulose binding domain is obtainable from a phage display library, a combinatorial library or a nucleic acid library. 22. The method of claim 1, wherein said cellulose binding domain is obtainable from a Clostridium cellulovorans, Clostridium thermocellum or Cellulomonas fimi protein or polypeptide. 23. The method of claim 20, wherein said cellulose binding domain is obtainable from a Clostridium cellulovorans protein or polypeptide. 24. The method of claim 1, wherein the microorganism is a bacterium, virus, fungus, protozoan, or nematode. 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the bacterium is an Escherichia, Salmonella, Listeria, Campylohacter, Legionella, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, or Shigella. 26. The method of claim 1, wherein the microorganisms are coliforms. 27. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample is a liquid extract of a solid sample. 28. A method of concentrating a particular microorganism or microorganisms in a sample, comprising the step of contacting said sample with a cellulose or chitin matrix to which is bound a cellulose binding protein (CBP)-receptor or cellulose binding domain (CBD)-receptor conjugate specific for said microorganism or microorganisms to concentrate said microorganism or microorganisms and enriching the concentrated microorganism or microorganisms by addition of a culture medium with or without antibiotics to said matrix. 29. The method of claim 28, further comprising the step of performing a method of detecting any microorganism or microorganisms that binds to said CBP-receptor or CBD-receptor conjugate bound to said matrix. 30. The method of claim 8, wherein the method of detecting a microorganism is performed using a biosensor. 31. The method of claim 25, wherein the bacterium is Escherichia coli. 32. The method of claim 31, wherein the E. coli, is E. coli 0157:H7. 33. The method of claim 25, wherein the bacterium is a Salmonella sp. 34. A method of concentrating a particular microorganism or microorganisms in a sample, comprising the step of contacting said sample with a matrix to which is bound an affinity receptor specific for said particular microorganism or microorganisms, said affinity receptor and said matrix being selected so as to allow capture of said microorganism or microorganisms to said matrix via said affinity receptor when present in said sample at a concentration of at least 0.00025 CFU/ml to about 10 3 CFU/ml, thereby obviating the need for a prolonged pre-enrichment step of said microorganism or microorganisms in said sample. 35. The method of claim 34, wherein said concentration is of at least 0.001 CFU/ml to about 1 CFU/ml. 36. The method of claim 34, wherein said matrix is selected from the group consisting of natural and synthetic matrices. 37. The method of claim 34, wherein said matrix is a polysaccharide matrix. 38. The method of claim 37, wherein said polysaccharide matrix is selected from the group consisting of a cellulosic matrix, an agarose matrix, a chitin matrix, a starch matrix and a matrix of cellulose, agarose, chitin and starch derivatives. 39. The method of claim 34, wherein said matrix is a coated matrix. 40. The method of claim 34, wherein said matrix is a synthetic matrix selected from the group consisting of a polypropylene matrix, polyester matrix, a polyamide matrix, a polyethylene matrix, an acrylamide matrix, a methacrylate matrix, a sepharose matrix, a polystyrene matrix and matrices which are derivatives thereof. 41. The method of claim 34, wherein said matrix is in a form selected from the group consisting of beads, threads, a cloth, a woven material, a non-woven material, a membrane, a powder, a foam and a sponge. 42. The method of claim 34, wherein said matrix is selected from the group consisting of a porous matrix and a non-porous matrix. 43. The method of claim 34, wherein said affinity receptor is directly bound to said matrix via covalent or non-covalent interactions. 44. The method of claim 34, wherein said affinity receptor forms a part of a conjugate or fusion including a counterpart moiety having affinity to said matrix. 45. The method of claim 44, wherein said counterpart moiety is a matrix binding peptide. 46. The method of claim 45, wherein said matrix binding peptide is a polysaccharide binding protein or domain. 47. The method of claim 46, wherein said polysaccharide binding protein or domain is a cellulose binding protein or domain. 48. The method of claim 47, wherein said cellulose binding protein or domain is from a bacterial, fungal, slime mold, or nematode. 49. The method of claim 45, wherein said matrix binding peptide is from a phage display library, a combinatorial library or a nucleic acid library. 50. The method of claim 46, wherein said cellulose binding protein or domain is from a species selected from the group consisting of Clostridium cellulovorans, Clostridium thermocellum and Cellulomonas fimi. 51. The method of claim 34, wherein said concentration of said microorganism or microorganisms in said sample is from at least 0.001 CFU/ml to about 10 3 CFU/ml. 52. The method of claim 34, wherein said concentration of said microorganism or microorganisms in said sample is from at least 0.008 CFU/ml to about 10 3 CFU/ml. 53. The method of claim 34, further comprising the step of washing said matrix to remove unbound material from said matrix. 54. The method of claim 34, further comprising the step of enriching the concentrated microorganism or microorganisms in situ by addition to the matrix of a culture medium selected from the group consisting of an antibiotics-containing culture medium and an antibiotics- free culture medium. 55. The method of claim 54, wherein said culture medium is an antibiotics-free culture medium. 56. The method of claim 34, further comprising the step of performing a method of detecting any microorganisms that bind to said affinity receptor bound to said matrix. 57. The method of claim 56, wherein said method of detecting any microorganisms is selected from the group consisting of an immunoassay and a nucleic acid signal amplification method. 58. The method of claim 57, wherein said nucleic acid signal amplification method is a polymerase chain reaction. 59. The method of claim 56, wherein said method of detecting any microorganisms is effected by a biosensor. 60. The method of claim 34, wherein said sample is contacted with said matrix in a single pass. 61. The method of claim 34, wherein said sample is contacted with said matrix in a single cycle. 62. The method of claim 34, wherein said sample is contacted with said matrix in more than one cycle. 63. The method of claim 34, wherein said sample is in a volume of 2 ml or less. 64. The method of claim 34, wherein said sample is in a volume of 2 ml to 4 liters. 65. The method of claim 34, wherein said sample is in a volume of2 ml to 10 liters. 66. The method of claim 34, wherein said microorganism is selected from the group consisting of a bacterium, a virus, a fungus, a protozoan and a nematode. 67. The method of claim 66, wherein said bacterium is of a genus selected from the group consisting of Escherichia, Salmonella, Listeria, Campylohacter, Legionella, Clostridium, Pseudomonas and Shigella. 68. The method of claim 34, wherein said microorganisms are coliforms. 69. The method of claim 34, wherein said sample is a liquid extract of a solid sample. 70. The method of claim 1, further comprising a prefiltration step for removal of debris in a form selected from the group consisting of particulates, fatty materials, starchy materials and proteinaceous materials from said sample. 71. The method of claim 34, further comprising a prefiltration step for removal of debris in a form selected from the group consisting of particulates, fatty materials, starchy materials and proteinaceous materials from said sample. 72. A filtering device comprising: (a) a housing defining a space having an inlet and an outlet forming a filtration path therein; (b) a first filter layer including a cotton filter being within said housing in said filtration path; (c) a second filter layer including a polyester filter being within said housing in said filtration path; and (d) a third filter layer including a polypropylene filter being within said housing in said filtration path. 73. A filtering device comprising: (a) a housing defining a space having an inlet and an outlet forming a filtration path therein; (b) a first filter layer including a polyurethane filter being within said housing in said filtration path; (c) a second filter layer including a non-woven filter being within said housing in said filtration path; and (d) a third filter layer including a polypropylene filter being within said housing in said filtration path. 74. The filtering device of claim 73, further comprising: (e) a fourth filter layer including a hollow body of woven mesh being within said housing in said filtration path.

Inventors: SAUNDERS ANTHONY, SHOSEYOV ODED, SIEGEL DANIEL L, SAUNDERS, ANTHONY, SHOSEYOV, ODED, SIEGEL, DANIEL, L.
Applicants: CBD TECHNOLOGIES LTD, FRIEDMAN MARK M, SAUNDERS ANTHONY, SHOSEYOV ODED, SIEGEL DANIEL L, YISSUM RES DEV CO, CBD TECHNOLOGIES LTD., FRIEDMAN, MARK, M., SAUNDERS, ANTHONY, SHOSEYOV, ODED, SIEGEL, DANIEL, L., YISSUM RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF THE HEBREW
Application year: 1999
Main classification: G01N21
IPC codes: C12M1, C12N1, C12Q1, G01N33