COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED VALUE MANAGEMENT TOOL FOR AN ASSET INTENSIVE MANUFACTURER

Abstract: A method of valuing resources of an asset intensive manufacturer. Calculations provide an MAV for each resource (machine) for each time horizon. The inputs for the calculations include the prices of products made by the resource, probalistic demand for the products, usage of the resource by various products, and availability of the resource. A series of equations, one equation associated with each resource, is formulated and solved, using lagrangian methods, with the lagrangian multiplier representing the resource value.

Description: COMPUTER- IMPLEMENTED VALUE MANAGEMENT TOOL FOR AN ASSET INTENSIVE MANUFACTURER TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to computer-implemented enterprise management tools, and more particularly to a computer-implemented method of calculating resource values for an asset intensive manufacturer. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION One of the unique challenges of any manufacturing enterprise is valuation of its products and resources. In the case of product valuation, traditionally, prices are computed on the basis of a cost-plus measure and some measure of the ability of the customer to pay. Resources are conventionally valued in terms of prices paid for them, for example, the price paid for a machine used to make products. In recent years, computer-implemented enterprise management tools have been developed to assist in management decisions. These tools often include pricing tools, intended to assist in the valuation process. Notable among product pricing tools are those especially developed for airlines. These tools are not necessarily suitable for manufacturers. For example, material intensive manufacturers have limited materials (components) rather than capacity. In contrast, asset intensive manufacturers have limited resource capacity and demand may be serviced before desired. In both cases, probabilistic demand is not in a particular order for different prices, as is the case with airline travel. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION One aspect of the invention is a method of valuing resources used to manufacture products. The method is especially useful for asset intensive manufacturers, who have limited capacity on their resources. The manufacturing process is modeled in terms of time periods, resources used during each time period, and products made by the resources. From this information, a usage value for each product per resource and an availability value for each resource can be determined. Additional input data parameters are the profit and allocation for each product. A probabilistic demand function is used to represent expected demand for each product . Given these values and the demand function, a value equation is formulated for each resource. Each value equation is expressed as a lagrangian equation having a lagrange multiplier that represents the resource value. The equations are then solved for the lagrange multiplier to obtain a value for each resource . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIGURE 1 illustrates how time periods, products, and resources of an asset intensive manufacturer are modeled for purposes of the invention. FIGURE 2 illustrates an example of time periods, products, and resources of an asset intensive manufacturer. FIGURE 3 illustrates additional problem data for the example of FIGURE 2. FIGURE 4 illustrates how MAV equations are set up and solved. FIGURE 5 illustrates the MAV equations for the example of FIGURE 2. FIGURE 6 illustrates the solutions of the MAV equations of FIGURE 5. FIGURE 7 illustrates the solution to the example problem in terms of allocations and expected revenues. FIGURES 8A and 8B illustrate Q and Q _1 functions, respectively. FIGURE 9 illustrates how a MAV calculation engine may be integrated into a larger product planning and scheduling system. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The following description is directed to a computer- implemented tool that implements a "value management" (VM) pricing method. The tool is designed especially for use by asset intensive manufacturers. U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/195,332, entitled "Computer- Implemented Product Valuation Tool", filed November 18, 1998, describes value management in general, and the concept of MAVs (minimum acceptable values) . It further describes how MAVs may be differently calculated depending on the type of enterprise and its primary manufacturing constraints. For example, certain manufacturers, such as those that make high tech computer equipment, may be primarily constrained by availability and price of components. Other manufacturers may be primarily constrained by varying lead times. Still other manufacturers are make-to-order manufacturers, who are set up for low inventories and lead times. U.S. Patent Serial No. 09/195,332 describes MAV calculations for each of these types of manufacturers, and is incorporated by reference herein. General Principles Value management applied to asset intensive manufacturers requires special considerations. Asset intensive manufacturing is characterized by limited capacity. Demand may be serviced before desired. Demand is not in any particular order for different price ranges, unless a premium is charged for shorter lead times or a discount is given for longer lead times. An example of an asset intensive manufacturing is steel manufacturing. A primary constraint is machine capacity, as opposed to availability of raw materials. If demand is high, production is most likely to be limited by insufficient machine capacity rather than by other constraints . Value management for asset intensive manufacturing is based on the following principle: Based on future uncertain demand for various products, expected prices for those products, and available capacities of resources during periods required to supply demand when demanded, a value for each resource during those periods can be calculated. The calculation results in threshold prices, referred to as minimum acceptable values (MAVs) for a given demand period. For an asset intensive manufacturer, the MAV of a resource monotonically deceases with increase in availability. As machine usage increases, each consumed unit is more expensive (assuming limited availability) . FIGURE 1 illustrates time intervals (tO , tl) ... (tn-1, tn) for which MAVs are to be computed. These intervals may represent seasons in which demands and/or prices for products are significantly different from those in other time intervals, even though the products may be the same. For simplification of example herein, it is assumed that the time intervals are the same for all products, but in practice that may not be the case. Three resources are designated as Rl, R2 , and R3. Two products are designated as PI and P2. Product PI uses Rl during interval (t01,tll), R2 during (t02,tl2), and R3 during (tl3,t23) . A resource may be used again in another time interval by the same product. Different products or the same product in different demand time periods may compete for the same resource by using a resource during the same time interval. It is this competition for the same resource that determines the value of the resource in each time period. Pertinent to the manufacturing scenario of FIGURE 1 is that the actual demand on the resources by the products takes place in time periods earlier than the period of demand. The demand could be much earlier for some resources, depending on the lead time. Many manufacturing enterprises use computer-implemented models and schedulers to map the product demand in a time period to the appropriate time period of usage of a resource. As indicated above, solving the valuation problem involves determining the value of each resource (machine) . It should be noted that a physical item demanded in one time period is considered as a separate product from the same item demanded in another time period. The prices for these same items in different time periods may also be different. Similarly, a resource in one time period is different from the same resource in another time period. Let there be Np products denoted by P 1( P 2 .. P Np . Indices 1 thru N p may be used to denote the products and the context will make that clear. Similarly there are N R resources R 1# R 2 .. RN R and indices 1 thru N R may be used to denote them. The following parameters are used to formulate the problem: sr = set of products using resource i s = set of resources used by product j U ' j usage of resource i by product j α J , = allocation for product j T 1 = available time (capacity) of resource i = price charged (or revenue) per unit of product j = cost per unit of product j y J = yield for product j f J (x) = probability density function of demand for product j ^ ' = probability that random variable x is greater than or equal to a J = value (profit) per unit from sale of product j J = total expected value from sale of product j = total expected value from sale of all products An example of a suitable allocation is a discrete allocation, such as determined by available-to-promise calculations . The resource valuation problem may be mathematically stated as: MaxV = V Vj , such that (I; V j = V j j xf j (x)dx + a j V j j f j (x)dx ( 2 ; Equation (1) states that the total time (capacity) consumed by all products using a resource equals the available time (capacity) on that resource. It may be more appropriate to have an inequality (<), but dummy products can always be defined with zero value to pick up the slack so that equality is as general as an inequality. However, negative slack should not be allowed. If overbooking is used, the capacity used will be the overbooked capacity. The lagrangian of the above-stated problem is: v , where the λ's are the lagrange multipliers, one for each equality constraint in Equation (1) . The necessary conditions (from calculus) are: dV /da } , where Equation (5) is a restatement of the equality constraints in Equation (1) . There are (N R + N D ) equations and same number of variables; thus they can be solved. Due to nonlinearity, a unique solution may not exist. It is interesting to note that the problem is convex . Both the obj ective function and the constraints are convex . From Equation ( 2 ) : SV j l da j = V j d j f j ia j tø j - v j a j f j (a J ) + f j {x)dx = V j Pr {demand for product j - a , } (6) In deriving Equation (6), the result has been repeatedly used from calculus that helps differentiate integrals whose limits may also be (along with the integrand) a function of the variable with respect to which the differentiation is being carried out . The demand for products can be modeled as one of various known distributions, such as normal or poisson. Whatever the model, it is assumed that the probability term in Equation (6) is defined as a function by G(a) (it is nothing but the complement of the cumulative distribution function (CDF) ) . More precisely: G{α) = I f{x)dx The inverse function is defined by G 1 (b) = a, so that b G(a). Thus from (4) and (6), it follows that: => a, = G -1 [(∑λ.U^/v j /εS (7; Substituting (7) in (5) results in: (8) The following expression represents the total prorated value of product j on resource i : Using prorated values, Equation (8) can be rewritten as: v' = v ,τ I U J , where J J ' is the prorated value (per unit of capacity) of product j on resource i. Even if a product has a high profit per unit of product, if it has a high usage of a resource then its prorated value (per unit capacity of resource) on the resource is reduced. Thus, the system of equations can be solved iteratively by assuming some initial λ's, prorating the value of each product used by a resource and solving for the new λ until all the λ's converge. The λ's correspond to the Minimum Acceptable Value (MAV) for a resource . Example of MAV Calculations FIGURES 2 - 7 illustrate an example of calculating MAVs of resources of an asset intensive manufacturer. As indicated above, each resource is valued in terms of its usage. In the example of this description, MAVs are calculated as $/unit-capacity with the unit of capacity being one hour. The MAVs may then be used to allocate and value the products made from the resources. FIGURE 2 illustrates a simple model of an asset intensive manufacturer. Products are defined in terms of machine usage, that is, which machines, how much time, and in what order. There are 2 resources (machines) Rl and R2. There are 4 time periods. Because resources are considered different if in different time periods, Rl is represented as Rl - R4 and R2 is represented as R5 - R8. Products are different if demanded in different time periods. Thus, for example, P13 is product PI demanded in time period 3. Resource usage per product is in terms of resources and times. Thus, PI uses Rl for 2 hours, R5 for 3 hours, and R2 for 5 hours. It can be noted that P3 is the same as PI in terms of resource usage, in that R6 is the same as R5 but in a different time period, and R3 is the same as R2 but in a different time period. Two resources are not used: R4 and R7. Resource availability specifies how much time is left on each resource. FIGURE 3 illustrates additional problem data for the example of FIGURE 2. The cost of making each product, its price, and yield are specified. Typically, the numbers used for these parameters are hypothetical -- assuming products are to be made with certain costs, prices, and yields, what is the value of resources used to make the products? Value (profit) is calculated from cost, price, and yield. Probabilistic demand may be modeled in various ways. An example of a demand distribution is a truncated normal distribution, expressed mathematically as: N τ (μ , σ.-x) = N (μ,σ:x) / Q(-μ/σ), x>0 , where Ν (μ,σ:x) is a normal distribution with mean, μ, and standard deviation, σ. Q (x) represents a normal distribution function. N (m,s:x)= 1 /^ " ^ ~μ/σ / , x e R A probability density function may be expressed for each product : f x (x) = N τ (15,5) f 5 (x) = N τ (15,6) f 2 (x) = N τ (10,3) f 6 (x) = tf r (10, 3) f 3 (x) = N r (12,8j f η (x) = N τ (20,8) f 4 (x) = N τ (15,3j f 9 (x) = N T (12, ) f 10 (x) = N τ (ll,l) The lagrangian equations formulated above may now be specialized for the demand. Following the above example, the equations are specialized for truncated normal distributions. G(a) is a probability function, as described above in connection with Equation (7) . N τ (μ,c:x) = J /f2πe- ((x~μ)/σ)2/2 /Q(-μ /σ),x≥ 0 = N(μ,a:x)/Q(-μ/σ G(a) = N τ (μ,cx)dx = 1 / V πQ(-μ/σ)) N(μ,o:x)dx a a = Q((a - μ) / ) / Q(-μ / σ) Using Equation (7) we get: G( 0j ) = Q(( Ωj ■ μ,)/σ, /βr- μ / (11 QfO j - j VO j ) : Q(- j '° j )( ∑ ■ U|)/v J kS R λ l /v ] " j = L J + <s J Q 1 [Q(-vi j '<' j )( ∑ λ 7 u;>/v ] (12: kS R From Equation (12) Σ λ 7 u; V j Qffa j - μ j J / Qf- μ j / σ j ) (13) kS R A revenue function is used to calculate expected revenue. Given allocation a, truncated normal demand with mean μ , standard deviation σ, and value v, what is the revenue R? From Equation (6) set out above, where x is demand for a product : θR/θx (a) = Pr{N τ (μ,σ) >a} = vjN T (μ, σ:x) dx = vQ( (a - μ)/σ)/Q(-μ/σ) , where the limits of integration are from a to ∞. It follows that: R(a) = jQ((x - μ)/σ/Q(-μ/σ)dx , where the limits of integration are from 0 to a. After some manipulation: R = vσ[h(a - μ) /o) - h (-μ/σ) ] /Q (-μ/σ) , where h(x) = xQ(x) - 1/ (2πe "x*x/2 ) \ Each equation is now written in terms of one variable using prorated product prices. The prorated value of a product i on resource j may be expressed as : , where V x is the value of a unit of product i and where λ : is the MAV for the jth resource. The summation is over 1 e S : R , where S R is the set of resources used by product j . FIGURE 4 illustrates a method of setting up and solving the lagrangian MAV equations. Each of the equations contains one variable, namely the corresponding λ for the resource. The system of equations is solved iteratively by assuming initial λ's (Step 41), prorating the value of each product used by a resource (Step 42) , and solving for a new λ for each equation until all the λ's converge (Steps 43 - 45) . FIGURE 5 illustrates the MAV equations, one for each resource. As noted above in connection with FIGURE 2, although there are eight resources, two are not used. Thus, there are six MAV equations. Each is a sum of "resource usage terms" (U is a factor) minus an availability term (T is a factor) . FIGURES 6 illustrates the solutions of the MAV equations of FIGURE 5. A MAV has been calculated for each of the six resources. FIGURE 7 illustrates allocations and expected revenues for the ten products made with the resources. A determination of whether the allocations are optimal can now be made. Additional Observations As indicated above, the MAV calculations provide a MAV for each resource (machine) for each time horizon. The inputs for the MAV calculations include the prices of products made by the resource, probalistic demand for the products, usage of the resource by various products, and availability of the resource. The output may also include a total expected revenue for the available manufacturing capacity by time horizon and by product. The relationship between MAV and allocation may be specifically expressed mathematically. For a normal distribution, an allocation equation may be expressed as: = μ, +es J Q- 1 (Q(-μ J /σ,)(∑ λ j U/j/v,) lεS* a j =r l j +σ j <2 '(Q(-μ /σ )i) =>α, =μ 7 +σ (-μ J /σ / ) => < j = μ^ - μ , = 0 If the value of a product is equal to or less than the summation (v.) above, it has zero allocation. In other words, the summation is analogous to consumed opportunity cost and λ is the MAV for a resource. FIGURES 8A and 8B illustrate examples of Q and Q "1 functions, respectively, such as those of the equations of FIGURE 5. Integration of MAV Into Larger Planning Systems FIGURE 9 illustrates how a resource valuation engine 91 may be integrated into a larger planning system 90. Engine 91 performs the MAV calculations described above. It accesses a MAV database 92, which stores the model data and other problem data described above. A computer implemented pricing tool 94 or demand forecasting tool 95 may be used to provide price and demand data, respectively. Once known, MAVs can be used with other control variables, such as ATP (available to promise) variables from ATP tool 96. Allocation data from valuation engine 91 can be used to determine how much of a product is available to promise. A scheduler 93 may be used in conjunction with MAV calculation engine 91, to receive and process resource values. In this manner, scheduler 93 can be used to provide a manufacturing schedule based on a deterministic demand model . The output of MAV calculation engine 91 can be further used to negotiate contract prices and due dates for incoming orders, to prioritize orders, and to add capacity using longer term MAVs. Resource values, expected revenue, and allocations can be provided to a master planning engine 97, which generates optimal manufacturing scenarios. Data such as price and allocation may flow both in and out of valuation engine 91. For example, the resource values calculated by engine 91 can be provided to pricing tool 94. In this manner hypotheticals can be formulated, evaluated, and applied. Other Embodiments Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims: CLAIMS : 1. A computer-implemented method of valuing resources used in the manufacture of one or more products, comprising the steps of : modeling the manufacturing process in terms of at least one time period, at least one resource, and at least one product ; providing a usage value for each product per resource; providing an availability value for each resource; providing a profit value for each product; providing an allocation value for each product; generating a demand function for said products; generating a value equation for each resource, based on said usage value, said availability value, said profit value, said allocation value, and said revenue function; and solving the value equations using a lagrangian process, each equation being expressed with a multiplier that represents a resource value. 2. The method of Claim 1, wherein said demand function is based on a truncated normal distribution. 3. The method of Claim 1, wherein said profit values are prorated for each product on each resource. 4. The method of Claim 1, further comprising the steps of generating a revenue function for each product based on said allocation value, said profit value, and said demand function, and of solving said revenue function for expected revenue of said product . 5. The method of Claim 1, wherein said solving step is performed by formulating a set of lagrange equations from said value equations, each lagrange equation having a multiplier as the single unknown variable. 6. The method of Claim 5, wherein each lagrangian equation is a sum of terms, each term associated with a usage value, minus said availability value. 7. The method of Claim 1, wherein said solving step is performed iteratively by setting initial values of the lagrange multiplier and converging to new lagrange multiplier values. 8. The method of Claim 1, wherein said solving step is performing using a binary tree. 9. The method of Claim 1, further comprising the step of providing said resource values to a scheduling engine. 10. A computer- implemented system for valuing resources used in the manufacture of one or more products, comprising: memory that stores a model of the manufacturing process in terms of at least one time period, at least one resource, and at least one product; memory that stores the following values: a usage value for each product per resource, an availability value for each resource, a profit value for each product, an allocation value for each product; a process for generating a demand function for said products; a valuation engine for generating a value equation for each resource, based on said usage value, said availability value, said profit value, said allocation value, and said revenue function; and for solving the value equations using a lagrangian process, each equation being expressed with a multiplier that represents a resource value. 11. The system of Claim 10, further comprising a demand forecast tool for providing demand data to said valuation engine. 12. The system of Claim 10, further comprising a pricing tool for providing product price data to said valuation engine. 13. The system of Claim 10, wherein said valuation engine further calculates expected revenue, using the allocation values, the profit values, and the demand function. 14. The system of Claim 10, further comprising a scheduling engine for generating manufacturing schedules based on the resource values. 15. The system of Claim 9, further comprising a master planning engine for determining product prices based on the resource values.

Inventors: KALYAN VIBHU K, KALYAN, VIBHU, K.
Applicants: I2 TECHNOLOGIES INC, KALYAN VIBHU K, I2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., KALYAN, VIBHU, K.
Application year: 1999
Main classification: G06F17
IPC codes: G05B19, G06F17, G06Q10, G06Q50, G06Q90