METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VELOCITY-NORMALIZED POSITION-BASED SCANNING

Abstract: A data collection method and system for scanning a scan window comprising one or more channels is disclosed wherein an integrated signal is normalized with respect to a scan velocity.

Description: METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VELOCITY-NORMALIZED POSITION-BASED SCANNING FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to methods, software and apparatus useful for scanning one or more channels using an integrating detector. More specifically, this invention relates to means for scanning which compensates for variable scanning velocities. BACKGROUND Scanning refers to a process whereby an integrated signal is obtained from one or more channels using an integrating detector which serially interrogates each channel. Such scanning systems are used in a variety of applications including text scanners, bar-code scanners, and electrophoresis scanners. A particularly important class of scanning systems are utilized in automated fluorescence-based DNA sequencing systems, e.g., U.S. Patent Nos. 4,811,218; 5,091,652, 5274240, 5,102,785 and 5,543,026. There are two important classes of scanning systems: position-based scanners and time-based scanners. In time-based scanners, a fixed integration time is used to collect an integrated signal from one or more channels of an object to be scanned. A feature of time-based scanning systems is that they provide low levels of time-dependent background signal. However, time-based scanners have the drawback that they generally display poor position repeatability, largely because of non-uniform scanning velocities due to acceleration/deceleration of the scanner and/or imperfect scanner repeatability. That is, the location of scan channels can vary from scan to scan. For example, in the case of an electrophoresis scanner, poor position repeatability may lead to poor lane tracking performance, i.e., it becomes impossible to distinguish a lane from neighboring lanes. This problem can become particularly severe when the density of lanes becomes high. In position-based scanners, the integration time is based on a width of a channel and a scan velocity. Thus, rather than integrating a signal over a specified time, the signal is integrated over a specified distance, i.e., a channel width. Position-based scanners generally have superior positional repeatability. Thus, in the electrophoresis scanning application, position- based scanners exhibit superior lane tracking performance. However, position-based scanners display a high level of background noise because of non-uniform integration times resulting from the non-uniform scanning velocities mentioned above. Because signal strength is proportional to integration time, such non-uniform integration times result in high levels of time-dependent background noise. Thus, it would be desirable to produce a scanner which combines the superior position repeatability of a position-based scanner with the low noise level of a time-based scanner. SUMMARY The present invention is directed towards the discovery of scanning systems which normalize an integrated signal intensity with respect to a scan velocity in order to achieve superior scanning performance. It is an object of the present invention to provide a scanning system which provides superior positional repeatability. It is another object of the present invention to provide a scanning system which has a reduced sensitivity to non-uniform scanning velocity. In a first aspect, the foregoing and other objects of the invention are achieved by a method for scanning a scan window comprising one or more channels comprising the steps of first detecting an integrated signal (S) across a scan window comprising one or more channels using an integrating detector, then calculating a velocity-normalized integrated signal (Sn). In another aspect, the present invention comprises a program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by a machine to perform the above method steps. In yet another aspect, the present invention includes An apparatus for scanning a plurality of channels comprising means for detecting an integrated signal (S) across a scan window comprising one or more channels using an integrating detector, and computer means for calculating a velocity- normalized integrated signal (Sn). These and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description, drawings, and appended claims. BRIEF DESCRD7TION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a process flow diagram illustrating the steps of the scanning method of the invention. FIG. 2 is a process flow diagram illustrating the steps of the velocity- normalization aspect of the scanning method of the present invention. FIG. 3 is a plot of average signal strength versus channel position for 78 scans of a 480-channel scan window using position-based data collection without velocity normalization. FIG. 4 is a plot similar to FIG. 3 but showing collected employing the velocity-normalized position based collection method of the present invention. FIG. 5 is a plot of signal-to-noise ratio versus channel number for data collected across a 480-channel scan window without the velocity normalization. FIG. 6 is a plot similar to FIG. 5 but showing data collected employing velocity-normalization. FIG. 7 is a plot of signal-to-noise ratio versus channel position across a 388-channel scan window using conventional time-based data collection. FIG. 8 is a plot similar to FIG. 7 but showing data collected employing velocity-normalization. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to those embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, which may be included within the invention as defined by the appended claims. The invention is based in part on the discovery that by normalizing an integrated signal with respect to a scan velocity in a position-based scanning system, scanning performance can be substantially improved. In particular, the magnitude of a time-dependent background noise level is substantially reduced. I. DEFINITIONS Unless stated otherwise, the following terms and phrases as used herein are intended to have the following meanings: "Channel" means a region over which an integrating detector collects an integrated signal. In particular, a channel comprises a start point, an end point and a read region. E.g., where an integrating detector is a CCD, the pixels or bins of the CCD are charged across a channel. A "scan window" is an array of neighboring channels which are serially interrogated, e.g., a collection of channels representing multiple lanes of a multi-lane electrophoresis system. "Integrated signal" means a signal which is accumulated over an integration time and where a signal strength is a function of the integration time. For example, in the case of a CCD detector, the integrated signal is that amount of charge built up over an integration time as a result of an exposure to light. "Integrating detector" means a detector which collects an integrated signal. Exemplary integrating detectors include but are not limited to charged coupled devices, photodiode arrays, charge injection devices, and active pixel CMOS detectors. "Velocity-normalized integrated signal" means an integrated signal which has been normalized with respect to a scan velocity. For example, in one preferred method of velocity normalization, an integrated signal S is divided by a scan velocity v to give a velocity-normalized integrated signal, Sn. π. SCANNING METHOD Generally, the scanning method of the invention is set forth in the process flow diagram of FIG. 1. First, a channel is defined in terms of a start point, an end point and a channel width, w. Where multiple channels are to be scanned, each channel will be individually defined. In the case of an electrophoresis scanner, a given electrophoresis lane should preferably comprise at least three scan channels. For example, an electrophoresis system using a slab gel electrophoresis format and having 96 electrophoresis lanes is scanned using a scan window 17.5 cm across and subdivided into 480 channels. Next, the integrating detector is positioned at the start point of the first channel to be scanned. Preferably, the detector is positioned relative to the channels using a stepper motor, and the precise relative location of the detector is determined by monitoring the encoder counts of the stepper motor and having an initial home position determined by a position sensor. Prior to scanning the first channel, the integrating detector is cleared, i.e., any residual integrated signal residing in the detector is purged from the detector. In the case of a CCD detector, the detector is cleared by discharging all of the active registers. Also, prior to beginning the scan, a start time, ts, is recorded. Next, the integrating detector is scanned across the channel from the start point to the end point by effecting a relative motion between the detector and the channel. This relative motion can be effected by moving the detector, moving the channel, moving an excitation light beam, e.g., using a galvo mirror, or any combination of such movements. Preferably, the end point is determined by counting the steps of a stepper motor used to effect the relative motion between the detector and the scan channels. When the scan has reached the end point of the channel, an end time, te, is recorded and an unnormalized integrated signal, S, is recorded. Following the scan, an integration time is calculated by computing the difference ts - te. The unnormalized integrated signal S is then normalized with respect to scan velocity by dividing the unnormalized integrated signal by a scan velocity, v. FIG. 2 shows a process flow diagram of a preferred method for performing the velocity normalization. First, a detector offset, So, is subtracted from the unnormalized signal to give an offset-adjusted unnormalized signal. The detector offset is a time-independent background signal characteristic of the particular integration detector employed. It is desirable to remove the detector offset component f the integrated signal so as to avoid dividing a time-independent quantity by a time dependent quantity. In a preferred method for determining So, a channel is scanned using a first integration time, tl, and a first integrated signal, SI, is recorded. Then, the channel is rescanned using a second integration time, t2, and a second integrated signal, S2, is recorded. Finally, a linear extrapolation of signal vs. integration time is performed and the value of So is the zero- integration-time intercept of the extrapolation. Next, the offset-adjusted unnormalized signal is multiplied by a scaling factor, tn, in order to expand the scale of the normalized signal. This scale expansion is performed to provide enhanced dynamic range and granularity to the velocity -normalized signal, Sn. Preferably, the value of tn is a nominal, or expected, integration time. Finally, the offset adjusted, scaled signal is divided by the integration time, ti, resulting in a velocity normalized integrated signal, Sn. Thus, the above operations can be summarized in the following equation relating unnormalized and normalized integrated signals, (S- So)tn Sw = // ' For scan windows comprising multiple channels, the above described normalization method is performed on each channel individually. For example, in a 96-lane electrophoresis system, 480 channels are used to scan the 96 lanes, each channel being normalized according to the method of the invention. In addition, the scan window may be repeatedly scanned to obtain additional information. IV. SCANNER The scanner of the present invention may be any apparatus which allows for the acquisition of an integrated signal across a scan window comprising one or more channels. Preferably, the scanner of the present invention is adapted to scan multiple electrophoresis lanes in a multi-lane electrophoresis system using laser-induced fluorescence detection, e.g., U.S. Patent Nos. 4,811,218; 5,091,652, 5274240, and 5,543,026. Generally, such electrophoresis scanners comprise (1) an integrating detector for collecting an integrated signal across an electrophoresis lane or portion thereof, (2) a light source for producing a light beam to excite fluorescence emissions from samples located in the electrophoresis lanes, (3) a scanning mechanism for the sequential interrogation of each of the one or more lanes seriatim, and (4) a computer for controlling the above elements and performing data acquisition and data normalization functions. Optionally, the scanner may include an electrophoresis system comprising one or more electrophoresis lanes for electrophoresing one or more samples simultaneously, e.g., for performing real-time measurements. The integrating detector of the electrophoresis scanner may be any detector capable of collecting an integrated fluorescence signal. Preferred integrating detectors include charged coupled device detectors and photodiode array detectors. The light source used in the electrophoresis scanner is preferably a laser, e.g., an argon ion, a helium-neon laser or a solid-state laser. The laser light may be directed parallel to the plane of the electrophoresis lanes of otherwise. The scanning mechanism of the electrophoresis scanner may be any mechanism which provides for serial interrogation of each of the one or more electrophoresis lanes. In one alternative configuration, the light beam and the integrating detector are both translated across the electrophoresis lanes, e.g., by providing relative motion between the light beam and detector and the electrophoresis lanes. Such relative motion may be achieved by moving the light beam and detector, the electrophoresis lanes, or both the light beam and detector and the electrophoresis lanes. The scanner may scan the electrophoresis lanes during electrophoresis, i.e., real-time detection, or after the electrophoretic separation has been completed, i.e., off-line detection. The electrophoresis system may be of conventional construction including one or more electrophoresis lanes, a voltage source, electrodes, buffer reservoirs, and the like. The electrophoresis lanes may be formed in a conventional slab gel, be independent channels formed in a continuous substrate, e.g., channels etched in a glass or plastic substrate, be located in discrete capillary tubes, or be in a flow-cell located at the outlet end of one or more capillary tubes, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 5,439,578. Preferably, in the present invention, the electrophoresis lanes are formed in a slab gel, and more preferably the lane density is at least 1.8 mm/lane. The computer of the scanner may be any conventional digital or analog computer. See Section V below. V. COMPUTER SYSTEM AND PROGRAM STORAGE DEVICE The steps of above-describe scanning method are preferably performed by a computer. In one preferred embodiment, the computer is made up of a processing unit, memory, I/O device, and associated address/data bus structures for communicating information therebetween. The microprocessor can take the form of a generic microprocessor driven by appropriate software, including RISC and CISC processors, a dedicated microprocessor using embedded firmware, or a customized digital signal processing circuit (DSP) which is dedicated to the specific processing tasks of the method. The memory may be within the microprocessor, i.e., level 1 cache, fast S-RAM, i.e., level 2 cache, D-RAM, or disk, either optical or magnetic. The I/O device may be any device capable of transmitting information between the computer and the user, e.g., a keyboard, mouse, network card, and the like. The address/data bus may be PCI bus, NU bus, ISA, or any other like bus structure. When the method is performed by a computer, the above-described method steps are embodied in a program storage device readable by a machine, such program storage device including a computer readable medium. Computer readable media include magnetic diskettes, magnetic tapes, optical disks, Read Only Memory, Direct Access Storage Devices, gate arrays, electrostatic memory, and any other like medium. VI. EXAMPLE The invention will be further clarified by a consideration of the following examples, which are intended to be purely exemplary of the invention and not to in any way limit its scope. EXAMPLE 1 Comparison of Noise Levels With and Without Velocity Normalization Using a Fixed Fluorescence Target Time-dependent noise levels were measured on an ABI PRISM™ 377 DNA Sequencer having a 96-lane capacity using scan windows having either 480 or 388 channels. Noise was measured using a dummy target fixture attached to the collection optics of the 377 system. The target was designed to mimic the actual background levels seen in DNA sequencing experiments. The target consisted of an outer housing containing two pieces of glass, each 1cm in diameter and having the same thickness as a standard sequencing plate, i.e., approximately 5 mm. The two glass discs were placed flat on top of one another and held in place by the outer housing. When screwed to the detector the housing held the two glass pieces in front of the laser beam. The glass served to provide a small reproducible fluorescent background and to scatter a portion of the laser light into the detector, thereby simulating actual running conditions. The scattered laser light and fluorescence were measured by the detection system of the 377. The 377 instrument was turned on several hours before starting the experiment to ensure that the laser and electronics were equilibrated to the normal operating temperature. The fixed target was used to collect data across a 480-channel scan window with firmware versions 2.2.j and 2.2.n. Data were also collected using 388-channel scan window with firmware versions 2.0, 2.2.j and 2.2.n. Each data set was collected for ten minutes using the fixed target and the Plate Check A run module software. Other instrument settings were as follows: CCD gain = 2; CCD offset = 0; CCD pixel position 212; laser power 40.0 mW; no temperature control = room temperature and pump off; electrophoresis voltage off; Virtual Filter 1: pixel 161-185 = 530-540 nm; Virtual Filter 2: pixel 214-236 = 554-564 nm Virtual Filter 3: pixel 273-295 = 581-592 nm Virtual Filter 4: pixel 336-358 = 610-621 nm. Data were written to the standard ABIF gel image file format. Data were imported and analyzed using a Lab View data analysis package. One hundred and four scans were collected in each 10 minute run. Twenty five scans were discarded at the beginning of each run. The final scan of each run was also discarded. This left 78 scans for analysis. The average and standard deviation of signal intensity of each channel over the 78 scans were calculated. The signal-to-noise ratio was calculated for each channel by dividing the average signal by the standard deviation of the signal. FIG. 3 is a plot of the average signal strength versus channel position for 78 scans of a 480-channel scan window collected with position- based collection without velocity normalization. FIG. 4 is a plot of similar data collected using the velocity-normalized position based collection method of the present invention. As can be seen from the Figures, the signal is less noisy when the velocity normalization scanning method is utilized. The noise that is most relevant to an actual sequencing experiment is the variation in signal intensity in a particular channel with respect to multiple scans. FIG. 5 is a plot of the signal to noise ratio versus channel number for data collected across a 480-channel scan window without velocity normalization (2.2.j firmware). The data plotted was from the red virtual filter only (i.e., the fourth virtual filter in the Plate Check A module). FIG. 6 is a similar plot of data collected with the velocity normalization method activated (2.2.n firmware). It is apparent from a comparison of Figures 5 and 6 that the signal to noise ratio of the data collected without velocity normalization is about one-half that of that of the data collected using velocity normalization. Comparison of data collected over a 388-channel scan window with velocity-normalized position based collection (2.2.n firmware) and conventional unnormalized time based collection (2.0 firmware) further demonstrates the efficacy of the velocity normalization method of the present invention. FIG. 7 is a plot of the signal-to-noise ratio versus channel position for a 388-channel scan window of data collected using conventional time-based data collection (2.0 firmware). As before, only data from the red virtual filter is shown. FIG. 8 is a plot of data from the same 388-channel scan window collected using the velocity-normalized position based collection method (2.2.n). From these plots it is evident that velocity- normalized position-based data collection is able to substantially reduce the noise due to changes in integration time inherent in conventional position- based data collection methods. In fact, the signal-to-noise ratio of the velocity-normalized position based collection is slightly larger than the signal-to-noise ratio of the time based collection. From a theoretical standpoint this is highly unexpected. The improved performance may be due to the fact that in time based acquisition scheme the integration time of each channel is determined by the instrument CPU. The CPU attempts to assign an equal integration time to each channel but the integration time can vary slightly depending on the processing load of the CPU. If the CPU is busy processing an interrupt service routine when a channel is read, data acquisition is delayed. In contrast, the position based collection scheme has integration times that vary considerably more than the time based firmware. However, the normalization method measures the actual integration time with the 16 Mhz clock at the moment of CCD readout. This measurement is extremely accurate and allows the firmware to achieve slightly lower noise than is possible even with time based data collection. EXAMPLE 2 Sample Normalizing Procedure The following are typical parameters obtained by performing a scan on an ABI PRISM™ 377 instrument. Units used are as follows. (1) Scanner motor encoder counts for distance. There are 1000 encoder counts per cm, or roughly 2500 per inch. (2) TIC (timer interrupt counts) for time. There are 4 million TICs per second. (3) A/D counts for CCD readouts. A fully saturated CCD would read OxFFFF (65535) counts. This experiment utilizes 194 data collection channels, over a distance of 6.2 inches (1.9 through 8.1 inches from the home position). Initially, the firmware calculates the start and end position of each channel — that is, the end position of one channel is the start position of the next. The following is a list of these encoder counts; the first value is the start of the first channel (#0), whereas the last value is the end count of the last channel (#193). Values are hexadecimal (base 16). 128E 12DD 132D 137D 13CD 14ID 146D 14BD 150D 155D 15AC 15FC 164C 169C 16EC 173C 178C 17DC 182C 187C 18CB 191B 196B 19BB 1A0B 1A5B 1AAB 1AFB 1B4B 1B9B 1BE 1C3A 1C8A 1CDA 1D2A 1D7A 1DCA 1E1A 1E6A 1EB9 1F09 1F59 1FA9 1FF9 2049 2099 20E9 2139 2189 21D8 2228 2278 22C8 2318 2368 23B8 2408 2458 24A8 24F7 2547 2597 25E7 2637 2687 26D7 2727 2777 27C6 2816 2866 28B6 2906 2956 29 6 29F6 2A46 2A96 2AE5 2B35 2B85 2BD5 2C25 2C75 2CC5 2D15 2D65 2DB5 2E04 2E54 2ΞA4 2EF4 2F44 2F94 2FE4 3034 3084 30D4 3123 3173 31C3 3213 3263 32B3 3303 3353 33A3 33F2 3442 3492 34E2 3532 3582 35D2 3622 3672 36C2 3711 3761 37B1 3801 3851 38A1 38F1 3941 3991 39E1 3A30 3A80 3AD0 3B20 3B70 3BC0 3C10 3C60 3CB0 3CFF 3D4F 3D9F 3DEF 3E3F 3E8F 3EDF 3F2F 3F7F 3FCF 401E 406E 40BE 410E 415E 41AE 41FE 424Ξ 429Ξ 42EE 433D 438D 3DD 442D 447D 44CD 451D 456D 45BD 460C 465C 46AC 46FC 474C 479C 47EC 483C 488C 48DC 492B 497B 49CB 4A1B 4A6B 4ABB 4B0B 4B5B 4BAB 4BFB 4C4A 4C9A 4CΞA 4D3A 4D8A 4DDA 4E2A 4E7A 4ECA 4F1A Next, an initial calibration scan is performed. For this purpose, every other channel spans across two positions in the list above, so that they become twice as wide. Four virtual filters are read from the CCD camera for each channel. In the end, the even and the odd channels are extracted and a median value is calculated for each virtual filter within each of these two different channel widths. These median values are then used for extrapolation to zero integration time. Separate scans are performed in the rightbound and leftbound directions. The following is a list of the median values at the narrow channel width (It) and the twice-as-large channel width (2t), along with the extrapolated values that were used as a CCD offset, for normalization of values during the run. The median values are listed in hexadecimal (unsigned), whereas the extrapolated values are decimal, signed (They may go below zero due to a hardware offset in our instrument). Rightbound baseline calibration CCD Filter 0 baseline: <0B98/lt>, <13E0/2t> —> < 848> CCD Filter 1 baseline: <02AO/lt>, <0520/2t> —> < 32> CCD Filter 2 baseline: <0500/lt>, <09FO/2t> —> < 16> CCD Filter 3 baseline: <09C8/lt>, <1380/2t> —> < 16> Leftbound baseline calibration CCD Filter 0 baseline: <0B9C/lt>, <13FE/2t> —> < 826> CCD Filter 1 baseline: <0294/lt>, <0531/2t> —> < -9> CCD Filter 2 baseline: <04FC/lt>, <09D8/2t> —> < 32> CCD Filter 3 baseline: <09D3/lt>, <1370/2t> —> < 54> The collection scan was now started. Each channel was again defined by the same list of encoder counts calculated above, but this time none of the counts from that list were skipped. In other words, each value from that list represents the end point of one channel and the beginning of the next. For each channel during the collection scan, a TIC (timestamp) is recorded, along with a signal indicating which virtual filter was being read from the CCD. At the end of each scan, normalization of the readings take place using these values. Also, a nominal integration time (t„) was calculated: <Nominal time=3415> The following is a list of parameters used for scaling the first few channels. The information recorded is • Channel number • TIC (Timer Interrupt Count, or timestamp) • Calculated integration time (from one TIC to the next, i.e. start to end of the channel) • For each virtual filter reading, a normalized and scaled A/D count <Ch= 0> <tic=FA2F> <Ch= 1> <tic=2CEC> <time=32BD> <0 : 0C42 -> 0C7E> <1 : 0279 -> 0288> <2 : 050D -> 052E> <3 : 09B4 -> 09F5> <Ch= 2> <tic=60E4> <time=33F8> <0 : 0C3F -> 0C43> <1 : 02B2 -> 02B3> <2 : 0508 -> 050A> <3 : 09FB -> 0A00> <Ch= 3> <tic=9567> <time=3483> <0: 0C7B -> 0C67> <1 : 029E -> 0298> <2 : 0568 -> 055O <3 : 09FF -> 09EA> <Ch= 4> <tic=C95D> <time=33F6> <0: OBEB -> OBFO> <1: 02EB -> 02EO <2;! 0517 -> 0519> <3: 09BD -> 09C2> <Ch= 5> <tic=FD6E> <time=3411> <0: 0C11 -> 0C11> <1: 02A7 -> 02A7> <2ι: 050C -> 050O <3: 09F0 -> 09F0> <Ch= 6> <tic=316A> <time=33FC> <0: 0C07 -> 0C0B> <1: 0279 -> 027A> <2s: 052E -> 0530> <3: 0A0D -> 0A11> <Ch= 7> <tic=65B6> <time=344C> <0: 0C36 -> 0C2O <1: 027F -> 027O <2;: 051F -> 0519> <3: 09BF -> 09B4> <Ch= 8> <tic=99BF> <time=3409> <0: 0C3E -> 0C40> <1: 02AC -> 02AO <2:: 04EC -> 04ED> <3: 098F -> 0991> <Ch= 9> <tic=CDDA> <time=341B> <0: OBEA -> 0BE9> <1: 0277 -> 0276> <2: 0507 -> 0506> <3: 09CF -> 09CD> <Ch= 10> <tic=015C> <time=3382> <0: 0BF5 -> OCOD> <1: 0283 -> 0289> <2: 051F -> 052D> <3: 09B8 -> 09D3> <Ch= 11> <tic=3535> <time=33D9> <0: OBCF -> 0BD8> <1: 0267 -> 0269> <2: 0507 -> 050O <3: 09F2 -> 09FD> <Ch= 12> <tic=69lE> <time=33E9> <0: OBDD -> 0BE4> <1: 029F -> 02A1> <2: 052B -> 052F> <3: 09CD -> 09D5> <Ch= 13> <tic=9D91> <time=3473> <0: 0C3D -> 0C2D> <1: 02AE -> 02A9> <2: 050F -> 0506> <3: 0A0A -> 09F8> <Ch= 14> <tic=D16C> <time=33DB> <0: OBBF -> 0BC8> <1: 0277 -> 0279> <2: 053C -> 0541> <3: 09DC -> 09E6> <Ch= 15> <tic=05B5> <time=3449> <0: 0BC9 -> 0BC0> <1: 0283 -> 0280> <2: 0519 -> 0513> <3: 09DA -> 09DO> <Ch= 16> <tic=39CD> <time=3418> <0: 0C13 -> 0C12> <1: 027D -> 027O <2: 0542 -> 0541> <3: 09CE -> 09CD> <Ch= 17> <tic=6DD9> <time=340C> <0: 0C17 -> 0C18> <1: 02A4 -> 02A4> <2: 04F8 -> 04F8> <3 : 0A23 -> 0A24> <Ch= 18> <tic=AlDA> <time=3401> <0: OBDD -> 0BE0> <1: 0274 -> 0274> <2: 0505 -> 0506> <3: 09DF -> 09E2> <Ch= 19> <tic=D640> <time=3466> <0: OBAF -> 0BA2> <1: 02BE -> 02B9> <2: 04CF -> 04C7> <3: 09CF -> 09BF> <Ch= 20> <tic=0955> <time=3315> <0: 0BE6 -> 0C11> <1: 0253 -> 025E> <2: 050C -> 0524> <3: 09A7 -> 09D7> <Ch= 21> <tic=3D9A> <time=3445> <0: 0B87 -> 0B7F> <1: 029A -> 0297> <2: 053E -> 0539> <3: 09B6 -> 09AD> <Ch= 22> <tic=7149> <time=33AF> <0: 0BC7 -> 0BD7> <1: 0287 -> 028B> <2: 04DF -> 04E8> <3: 09C8 -> 09DB> <Ch= 23> <tic=A5A2> <time=3459> <0: 0BF7 -> OBEB> <1: 02AF -> 02AB> <2: 0515 -> 050E> <3: 0A2B -> 0A1D> <Ch= 24> <tic=D9C2> <time=3420> <0: 0BE7 -> 0BE5> <1: 027F -> 027E> <2 0519 -> 0517> <3: 09CF -> 09CO <Ch= 25> <tic=0DBC> <time=33FA> <0: OCOE -> 0C12> <1: 02AA -> 02AB> <2 0503 -> 0505> <3: 0A12 -> 0A17> All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail above, those having ordinary skill in the scanning art will clearly understand that many modifications are possible in the preferred embodiment without departing from the teachings thereof. All such modifications are intended to be encompassed within the following claims.

Claims: WE CLAIM: 1. A data collection method for scanning a scan window comprising one or more channels comprising the steps of: detecting an integrated signal (S) across a scan window comprising one or more channels using an integrating detector; and calculating a velocity-normalized integrated signal (Sn). 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of calculating the velocity-normalized integrated signal (Sn) comprises: determining a scan velocity, v; and dividing the integrated signal S by the scan velocity v. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of calculating the velocity-normalized integrated signal (Sn) comprises: measuring a channel width (w); determining a time for traversing the channel width (t); and computing a velocity-normalized integrated signal according to the equation Sn=S/(w/t). 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of calculating the velocity-normalized integrated signal (Sn) comprises subtracting a detector offset So from an integrated signal (S). 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the channels are disposed in a linear array. 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the channels are lanes in a multilane electrophoresis system. 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the lanes are located in a slab gel. 8. The method of claim 6 wherein the lanes are located in isolated electrophoresis channels. 9. The method of claim 6 wherein the lane density of the multilane electrophoresis system is at least 1.8 mm/lane. 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of detecting an integrated signal across a scan window is effected using a stepper motor to cause a relative motion between the scan window and the integrating detector. 11. The method of claim 10 wherein a channel width (w) is measured by counting steps in the stepper motor. 12. The method of claim 11 wherein a position sensor is used to define a home position for initializing the stepper motor. 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the integrating detector is a CCD or a photodiode array. 14. The method of claim 1 wherein the integrated signal results from detection of a fluorescence emission. 15. The method of claim 14 wherein the fluorescence emission is stimulated by a laser. 16. An apparatus for scanning a plurality of channels comprising: means for detecting an integrated signal (S) across a scan window comprising one or more channels using an integrating detector; and computer means for calculating a velocity-normalized integrated signal (Sn). 17. An apparatus for scanning a scan window having one or more channels comprising: an integrating detector; a scanner for effecting a scanning of the integrating detector relative to a scan window comprising one or more channels; and a computer for calculating a velocity-normalized integrated signal (Sn). 18. The apparatus of claim 17 wherein the integrating detector is a charged coupled device. 19. The apparatus of claim 17 wherein the scanner comprises a stepper motor. 20. The apparatus of claim 17 wherein the scan window comprises multiple electrophoresis lanes. 21. A program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by a machine to perform method steps to scan a scan window comprising one or more channels, said method steps comprising: detecting an integrated signal (S) across a scan window comprising one or more channels using an integrating detector; and calculating a velocity-normalized integrated signal (Sn). 22. The program storage device of claim 21 wherein the step of calculating the velocity-normalized integrated signal (Sn) comprises: determining a scan velocity, v; and dividing the integrated signal S by the scan velocity v. 23. The program storage device of claim 21 wherein the step of calculating the velocity-normalized integrated signal (Sn) comprises: measuring a channel width (w); determining a time for traversing the channel width (t); and computing a velocity-normalized integrated signal according to the equation Sn=S/(w/t). 24. The program storage device of claim 21 wherein the step of calculating the velocity-normalized integrated signal (Sn) comprises subtracting a detector offset So from an integrated signal (S). 25. The program storage device of claim 24 wherein a channel width (w) is measured by counting steps in the stepper motor.

Inventors: SLETTNES TOR, SLETTNES, TOR
Applicants: PERKIN ELMER CORP, THE PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION
Application year: 1999
Main classification: G01N27
IPC codes: G01N27, G06T1, H04N1