CHICKEN MEAT PRODUCT

Abstract: A chicken meat product rendered substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species by having an external coating of sodium diacetate substantially free of an adhesive material. The wet coating is retained on the external surfaces of the dressed chicken meat by the surface tension of the sodium diacetate solution after the chicken meat is coated with the solution and is hung freely to permit excess liquid to drain away. The amount of sodium diacetate present in the product of the invention depends upon the degree of pathogenic bacterial contamination of the chicken meat. The sodium diacetate is included in each case in sufficient quantity to preserve the meat from growth of all pathogenic bacteria of the order and species of salmonella, E. coli, and campylobacter.

Description: CHICKEN MEAT PRODUCT This application is based on applicant's provisional application Serial No. 60/083,660 filed April 30, 1998. Field of Invention This invention relates to a packaged chicken meat product — either a dressed whole chicken or dressed chicken parts — coated with a film of sodium diacetate or a water solution thereof to combat and eliminate certain pathogenic bacteria. Background of Invention Chicken production and processing for meat is a large and growing U.S. industry. Profit for processors, however, is not more than a few cents per pound of dressed chicken. The intense competition often leads to hazardous cost cutting that is contrary to good processing practices as prescribed by government oversight agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food Safety Inspection Service. Salmonella, E. coli, and campy lobacter have been clearly identified by many studies made by these government agencies, and by meat processors, as species of pathogenic bacteria that have often been found in chicken meat and have been the cause of food poisoning outbreaks that have affected large numbers of the population, often with many fatalities. For example, a very significant finding by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia reports that "Illness caused by chickens rose threefold between 1988 and 1992. " And as reported in the February 8, 1998 issue of Consumer Reports, "salmonella and campy lobacter cause 1.1 to 7 million food-borne infections and 2000 deaths per year. " Further, as reported in The New York Times of January 5, 1998: "The [current poultry pathogen hunt carried out by the U.S.D.A.] comes at a time when poultry risks are gaining much media attention. The New York Times and television's Cable News Network in -2- October reported that 'Campy lobacter... infects from 70% to 90% of all U.S. chickens. The reports state that the bacteria causes 2 million to 8 million people annually to become ill, and is responsible for 200 to 800 deaths each year. " An important discovery — the use of sodium diacetate in retarding, inhibiting and preventing the growth and development of microorganisms in foodstuffs — was patented over 50 years ago in U.S. Patent No. 2,417,806, issued March 25, 1947. However, in every case of external application of the sodium diacetate, the specification of that patent called for the use of an adhesive base, a potentially adhesive base, a colloidal or gelatinous adhesive material, an adhesive suspending medium, a gum, gelatin, a solidifying agent or the like for adhering the sodium diacetate to the meat being treated. The instant invention provides a food product comprising dressed chicken meat having a coating of a water solution of sodium diacetate, or of a dried sodium diacetate, that is substantially free of any adhesive material. Summary of the Invention The food product of this invention comprises dressed chicken meat, either a whole dressed chicken or dressed chicken parts, which has a film or coating of sodium diacetate — either dry or in a water solution ~ that extends across the external surfaces of the chicken meat and is substantially free of any adhesive material. The wet coating is retained on the external surfaces of the dressed chicken meat by the surface tension of the sodium diacetate solution after the chicken meat is coated with the solution and is hung freely to permit excess liquid to drain away. After the solution has dried, the sodium diacetate remains on the meat as a dry coating. In some embodiments of the product of this invention the percentage by weight of the sodium diacetate in the water solution is from about 0.02% to about 0.099% of the weight of the dry dressed chicken meat. -3- Preferred embodiments of the product of this invention include a removable casing positioned around the dressed chicken meat and the coating of sodium diacetate water solution or dry coating of sodium diacetate. The amount of sodium diacetate present in the product of the invention depends upon the degree of pathogenic bacterial contamination of the chicken meat. The sodium diacetate is included in each case in sufficient quantity to preserve the meat from growth of all pathogenic bacteria of the order and species of salmonella, E. coli, and campy lobacter. As used in this specification and the appended claims, (1) the term "chicken meat part" includes drumsticks, breasts, wings and backs, (2) the term "adhesive material" includes an adhesive base, a potentially adhesive base, a binder, an adhesive suspending medium, a gum, other adhesive colloidal material, a gelatin or the like for adhering the sodium diacetate to the meat being treated and (3) the term "casing" includes flexible wrappings. There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, the more important features of the invention in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood, and in order that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. There are, of course, additional features of the invention that will be described hereinafter and which will form the subject matter of the claims appended hereto. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception upon which this disclosure is based, may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, methods and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention. It is important, therefore, that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Advantages of the Invention The food product of this invention produces a chicken meat that is totally free of three very dangerous pathogenic bacteria species: o salmonella enterides and related species; o escheritia coli 0157/H7 and related pathogenic coliform bacteria species; and o campy lobacter jejuni and related pathogenic species. These are the "pathogenic bacterial species" referred to throughout this specification. The food product of this invention is storage stable, with no reappearance of the above pathogens when the chicken meat is held under conventional refrigeration (35° to 40 °F) or frozen storage (-10° to 5°F) in airtight packaging materials such as polystyrene trays wrapped in polyethylene film. In addition to being free of the three above mentioned types of virulent pathogens, the food product of this invention is characterized by: o the enhancement of the growth of naturally occurring lactobacilli which are beneficial bacteria essential for the digestion of food; o the absence of any deleterious odor or taste in the meat upon preparation and cooking it for eating; and o the absence of any alteration of the natural texture of the meat which would make it less attractive for eating. The food product of this invention has several very important advantages over known dressed chicken meat products whether whole chicken or parts. Applicants have not only discovered that the sodium diacetate film contained in the food product of their invention will adhere to the meat being treated without the use of any adhesive material, but in addition they have discovered that in the absence of adhesive material the sodium diacetate is substantially more -5- effective in combating and eliminating the pathogenic bacteria species in question. These facts reduce the cost of treating the chicken meat in two significant ways. First, the amount of sodium diacetate required is markedly reduced. Second, the cost of the adhesive material is wholly eliminated. Both these cost savings are important when the margin of profit in the sale of dressed chicken meat is as low as it is. These together with other objects of the invention, along with the various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming a part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of the invention, its operating advantages and the specific objects attained by its uses, reference should be had to the accompanying descriptive matter in which there is discussed preferred embodiments of the invention. Still other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure that follows. Detailed Description In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a food product comprising dressed chicken meat selected from the group of (i) a whole dressed chicken and (ii) a dressed chicken part; and a coating of sodium diacetate substantially free of an adhesive material that extends along the external surfaces of the dressed chicken is provided. The external meat coating contains at least 0.02% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product. This new food product with sodium diacetate that is substantially free of an adhesive material renders the food product substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species. In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, a food product comprises dressed chicken meat and an agent of sodium diacetate substantially free of an adhesive material combined with the dressed chicken meat. The agent contains at least 0.02% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product. Again, the food product is rendered substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species. -6- In yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention which renders the food product substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species, the food product comprises dressed chicken meat and an agent containing sodium diacetate. The agent being combined with the dressed chicken meat and containing about 0.02% to about 0.099% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product. Moreover, the agent may contains about 0.02% to about 0.085%; about 0.02% to about 0.063%; about 0.04% to about 0.085%; about 0.04% to about 0.063%; or about 0.051 % to about 0.085% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product. In another series preferred embodiments of the present invention, a food product comprises dressed chicken meat and an agent containing sodium diacetate. When the agent contains about 0.02% to about 0.04%; about 0.04% to about 0.051 %; about 0.051 % to about 0.063%; about 0.063 % to about 0.085%; or about 0.085% to about 0.099% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product, the food product is rendered substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species. Processing Steps The process for making dressed chicken meat includes the following steps: (1) slaughtering, defeathering, removal of head and feet; (2) eviscerating, trimming, washing and chilling; (3) packaging, storing, transporting and storing; and (4) refrigeration/freezing. The cutting of the whole chicken into "parts" may occur either after trimming or after "storing" . The sodium diacetate may be applied to the dressed chicken meat in a water solution before the meat is packaged, either before or after chilling. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a food product comprises dressed chicken meat selected from the group consisting of i) a whole dressed chicken and ii) a dressed chicken part, and a coating of a water solution of sodium diacetate that is substantially free of any adhesive material. -7- The coating of a water solution of sodium diacetate extends across the external surfaces of the dressed chicken meat and is retained on the external surfaces, because of the surface tension of the water solution. After the dressed chicken meat is coated with the solution, it is hung freely to permit excess liquid to drain away. Preferably, the external surface of the coating of a water solution of sodium diacetate is substantially smooth throughout. The food product of the present invention may also include a removable casing positioned around the dressed chicken meat and the coating of sodium diacetate water solution. Moreover, the sodium diacetate of the water solution may be retained in solid form on the external surfaces after the water of the solution has evaporated. This food product may also include a removable casing positioned around the dressed chicken meat and the dried coating of sodium diacetate. In the preferred embodiments above, the percentage by weight of sodium diacetate in the water solution may be from about 0.02% to about 0.099% of the weight of the food product. -8- Preparation of Sodium Diacetate Solution Sodium Diacetate water solution is prepared at the desired concentration using clean, fresh water. Distilled, de-ionized or natural spring, low hardness water is preferred. For example: % Concentration Sodium Diacetate Water (ca. 10° - 30° C) 20% 20 grams 80 ml 15% 15 grams 85 ml 10% 10 grams 90 ml The sodium diacetate dissolves readily. Saturation is 40%. The concentration selected may vary from 5% to 40% to accommodate mechanical spraying devices used to apply the sodium diacetate solution on the chicken meat. It will depend also on the degree of bacterial infection of the chicken meat due to processing and handling. The anticipated exposure to infection of the chicken meat after it is unpackaged, the length of time before cooking and other factors will be taken into account. Application of Sodium Diacetate The amount of sodium diacetate normally required on the chicken meat to render it totally free of pathogenic bacterial species is a practical range of 0.05 % to 0.3% of the weight of the food product (i.e. , chicken meat and sodium diacetate). For greatly infected meat, a larger quantity may be required to stop all growth of the pathogenic bacteria. A practical range to render the dressed chicken meat substantially free of pathogenic bacteria species is at least 0.02% of the weight of the food product. Spraying the sodium diacetate solution onto the chicken meat is easily accomplished. Dipping the chicken meat into sodium diacetate solution is also effective and practical. Brushing the chicken meat with the sodium diacetate solution is another suitable method. The devices that can be used to apply the sodium diacetate solution to -9- the chicken meat, include all forms of mechanical, pneumatic, electrical or hand operated equipment. Included are those which through introduction of an electrical current charge and/or ionize the Sodium Diacetate solution before or during the spraying action. Whatever mechanical, pneumatic or electrical spraying device is used, it is very important that it deliver a uniform mist of droplets, which will establish a uniform film of sodium diacetate solution on all surfaces of the chicken, with attention paid to the exposed cavity surfaces of the whole chicken. The sodium diacetate may also be applied by dipping the whole chicken meat or parts into a 5% - 35% water solution of sodium diacetate. The dwell- time in the solution will be determined by the factors of degree of infection, whether the whole chicken or chicken parts are being treated, and the condition of the processing operation equipment. Another method is to brush the solution onto the chicken meat surfaces by hand or mechanically. Or a combination of the above methods may be used. The sprayed, dipped or brushed chicken meat is allowed to hang freely to permit excess liquid to drain away. A hooded conveyor within which the air is controlled to prevent reinfection of the chicken meat is ideal. As will be recognized, as a result of the steps described a film or coating of sodium diacetate water solution is retained on the external surfaces of the whole dressed chicken, or chicken part, because of the surface tension of the solution. The amount of sodium diacetate solution remaining on a given dressed chicken meat, after such draining is continued until the solution stops dripping off the meat, will be substantially the same regardless of the amount of sodium diacetate contained in this solution, or in other words, regardless of what the concentration of the solution is. As will be further understood, the thickness of the layer of sodium diacetate solution will be substantially the same throughout the meat surfaces. Subtracting the dry (pre-application) weight of the dressed whole chicken or chicken part (as the case may be) from the weight of the wet chicken meat -10- will give the weight of the sodium diacetate solution that coats the dressed chicken or the dressed chicken part. Multiplying this weight of retained water solution by the predetermined percentage weight of sodium diacetate will in each case give the weight of sodium diacetate retained on the dressed chicken meat. This can then be expressed as a percentage of the weight of the wet meat. Packaging A wide variety of choices exists. A styrofoam tray with an overwrap of polyethylene film is standard. The chicken meat is to be wet when wrapped. A series of tests were made to show the extent to which various concentrations of sodium diacetate water solutions that are substantially free of adhesive material will inhibit the growth of salmonella, E.coli and campy lobacter on dressed whole chicken or dressed chicken parts. Example 1 Tests made using plate culture media favorable to the growth of salmonella (enterides), and E. coli (H0157) clearly indicated that a water solution of sodium diacetate stops the growth of those bacteria when sufficient quantities of sodium diacetate are included in the medium. In a zone of inhibition test, a drop of sodium diacetate water solution was placed on agar plate media previously inoculated with E. coli and salmonella, respectively. The plates were incubated for 24-48 hours. The zones of inhibition (minimum diameter of the colony) of the respective bacteria were measured. The larger the diameter as thus measured, the greater the degree of inhibition of the colony of the bacteria. The data from these tests are set forth below. Concentration of sodium Diameter of zone of Diameter of zone of diacetate inhibition for E. coli(in inhibition for mm.) salmonella(in mm.) Negative Control 0 0 20% 20 22 10% 16 19 -11- 5% 12 15 2.5% 0 10 2.0% 0 10 1.5% 0 0 .75% 0 0 .50% 0 0 .25% 0 0 Positive Control 20 24 -12- Example 2 This test shows that a water solution of sodium diacetate inhibits the growth of pathogenic bacteria on skinless chicken parts. A quantity of chicken parts (drumsticks, skin removed) was inoculated with salmonella enter ides bacteria, simulating a commercial situation. The surface of the chicken meat was then sprayed, using a hand operated spray bottle, with 20% Sodium Diacetate water solution. The chicken was then packaged in a polyethylene bag and incubated at 4°C. Samples were removed initially and at 30 minutes, and 24, 72 and 120 hours. These were then tested for number of salmonella present. (Laboratory method per Association of Agricultural Chemists.) Similar tests were made inoculating the chicken with E. coli H0157 and campylobacter jejuni. With each of the species, a control sample that was given no treatment was included. In this Example 2 and in Examples 3-5-8 and 9 below, the results of the tests are expressed in terms of the number of bacteria cells per gram of chicken meat. -13- In this Example 2, sodium diacetate treatment reduced the bacteria numbers to zero in 72 hours. Bacteria numbers in untreated chickens rose to 700,000/gram. Chicken drumsticks held at 4° C. Test No. Initial 30 Min. 24 Hrs. 72 Hrs. 4 Surface inoculated with salmonella, then sprayed with 20% solution of sodium diacetate. 140 230 20 0 3 Surface inoculated with Salmonella. No sodium diacetate applied. 260 320 390 120,000 2 Surface inoculated with E. coli then sprayed with 20% solution of sodium 180 30 10 0 diacetate 1 Surface inoculated with E. coli. No sodium diacetate applied. 190 600 1400 700,000 6 Surface inoculated with campylobacter, then sprayed with 20% solution of sodium diacetate 220 130 0 0 5 Surface inoculated with campylobacter. No sodium diacetate applied. 160 130 0 0 E. coli isolate - E. coli 0157-H7 Salmonella - Salmonella Enteritidis Campylobacter - Campylobacter jejuni -14- Example 3 This is a repeat test of Example 2, and shows that sodium diacetate inhibits pathogen bacteria on skinless chicken meat. Test No. Initial 30 Min. 24 Hrs. 72 Hrs. 4A Surface inoculated with salmonella then sprayed with 20% solution of sodium diacetate 250 30 0 0 3A Surface inoculated with Salmonella. No sodium diacetate applied. 410 1200 16,000 200,000 2 A Surface inoculated with E. coli, then sprayed with 20% solution of sodium 140 40 0 0 diacetate E. coli 1A Surface inoculated with E. coli. No sodium diacetate applied. 120 1800 2800 400,000 6A Surface inoculated with campylobacter, then sprayed with 20% solution of sodium diacetate 110 30 0 0 5A Surface inoculated with campylobacter. No sodium diacetate applied. 130 80 0 0 The data for this Example 3 show again that sodium diacetate treatment of skinless chicken meat that has been deliberately exposed to (inoculated with) three pathogen bacteria quickly reduces the latter to zero numbers. -15- Example 4 This Example 4 shows that sodium diacetate inhibits pathogens on chicken, with skin held at 4°C. Test No. Initial 30 Min. 24 Hrs. 72 Hrs. 10 Surface inoculated with Salmonella, then sprayed with 20% solution of sodium diacetate. 700 40 10 0 9 Surface inoculated with Salmonella. No sodium diacetate applied. 560 1800 2800 3000 8 Surface inoculated with E. coli, then sprayed with 20% solution of sodium 460 80 10 0 diacetate. 7 Surface inoculated with E. coli. No sodium diacetate applied. 520 960 1400 3000 12 Surface inoculated with campylobacter, then sprayed with 20% solution of sodium diacetate 210 60 0 0 11 Surface inoculated with campylobacter. No sodium diacetate applied. 160 40 0 0 -16- Example 5 Skinless chicken - 5% . 10%. 20% sodium diacetate water solutions Sodium Bacteria DiSoέtoiθn* Colonies per Inoculation Gram 24 hrs. 72 Hrs. Initial Salmonella 0% 220 1,200 40,000 5 280 60 220 10 130 40 280 20 180 10 0 E. Coli 0 210 1,600 150,000 5 260 260 780 10 120 100 430 20 180 0 0 Campylobact 0 230 70 0 er 5 250 30 0 10 270 10 0 20 190 0 0 * Concentration Summary of Examples 2 - 5 Sodium diacetate in water solution, sprayed onto chicken meat, with or without skins, firmly controls three pathogen bacteria species. The range of control is 5 % sodium diacetate water solution for simulated commercial infection of mild degree to 20% sodium diacetate water solution for major infection (beyond the probability of occurrence with reasonably good processing -17- practice. Example 6 The data in Examples 1 - 5 demonstrate that sodium diacetate is an effective agent in eliminating three pathogenic bacteria genera on chicken meat by spraying sodium diacetate solution onto the meat, or by immersing the chicken meat in the sodium diacetate solution. Determination was made of the percent of weight of sodium diacetate deposited on the chicken when a range of sodium diacetate water solutions was employed. As one example: Weight of chicken after spraying 20% sodium diacetate solution 1,341.6 gm Weight before spraying 1,335.9 εm Weight of retained sodium diacetate solution 5.45 gm. 20% sodium diacetate 1.14 gm. Percent sodium diacetate on chicken 0.085% The table just below sets forth the results of the other percentage concentrations of sodium diacetate water solution used in these calculations. -18- Percent Sodium Diacetate Deposited on Chicken Meat Water Solution Amount of Sodium Percent Sodium Diacetate Deposited Diacetate Method on Chicken Meat 23.0% Spraying 0.099% 20.0% 0.085% 15.0% 0.063% 12% 0.051% 10% 0.04% 5% 0.02% 12% Immersing 0.099% 10% 0.04% 5% 0.02% -19- Example 7 A simple test was set up to establish the effect, if any, of an extended treatment of sodium diacetate on the taste, odor, texture, and moisture of fresh chicken. The test was set up to simulate cooling a freshly dressed chicken in an ice water bath (chilling tank), which is a common practice in poultry processing. It should be noted that the dwell in this test is considered to be excessive of the time necessary to adequately control bacterial growth. A fresh, whole chicken carcass was placed in a stainless steel container containing a 20 % solution of sodium diacetate (2 pounds) , water (6 pounds) and ice (2 pounds). The solution temperature prior to adding the test bird was noted at 35.5°F. The bird was submersed in the bath for a total of 30 minutes, turning the bird every 7.5 minutes to insure equal interior and exterior surface exposure. After 30 minutes, the bird was removed from the solution, hung to drip for 5 minutes, and placed into an airtight bag for refrigerated storage at 38°F. for 48 hours. After 48 hours had elapsed, the bird was removed from the bag, cut into pieces, and rinsed with cool water (normal preparation for frying). The pieces were then dipped in egg, rolled in a mixture of one half flour and one half Golden Dipt Chicken Fry Mix, and placed in an electric frying pan with vegetable oil at 350°F. After preparation, the hot fried chicken was tasted by a panel of six people. Other than the operator of that test and his wife, no one was aware of the sodium diacetate treatment prior to preparation. Everyone tasting was -20- familiar with the recipe used. A unanimous consensus of all six "tasters" found the chickens' flavor, texture, moisture, and aroma to be very good. The remaining pieces were then refrigerated for 12 hours and tasted cold. The results were the same, with all panel members finding flavor, texture, moisture and aroma very good. The conclusion of this test indicates that an extended treatment of chicken with sodium diacetate has no affect on flavor, texture, moisture or aroma. -21- Example 8 Sodium diacetate is selective, inhibiting pathogenic coliform bacteria, but encouraging harmless and beneficial bacteria species. The latter are lactobaciUi which are commonly found in vegetables, meat and fruit. These species produce lactic acid and acetic acid which combined are milk preservatives effective against mold organisms and mildly so against some bacteria species. The data in Table 8 demonstrate this. Skinless chicken drumsticks (obtained at a local supermarket) were inoculated with chicken feces to assure presence of pathogens. Sodium diacetate in water solution was then sprayed onto the skinless chicken parts which were then held at 4°C. and tested for bacteria per gram at intervals of 24 and 48 hours with the following results: 24_ Hours 48 Hours Reagent Coliforms LactobaciUi Coliforms LactobaciUi 0% Sodium diacetat 30 700 30 40 5 % Sodium diacetate water solution 20 900 10 10 10% 0 1100 0 90 20% 900 950 These data indicate again the selectivity of bacteriostatic action of sodium diacetate on micro-organisms commonly found on chicken presented for commercial sale. Coliforms (pathogens) were eliminated in 24 hours in sodium diacetate -22- treated chickens. Conversely, lactobaciUi growth was enhanced by 10% and 20% sodium diacetate solution sprayed on the chicken. Example 9 This example shows the comparative efficacy of various methods of applying sodium diacetate water solution to skinless chicken drumsticks, expressed in terms of bacteria per grams of meat after storage at 4°C.

Claims: -23- Method 24 Hrs. 96 Hrs. Salmonella — E. Coli — Campy- Salmonella — E. Coli ~ Campy- 157 lobacter 0157 lobacter 1. Control No 300 700 700 700 2800 0 Sodium Diacetate 1A. Control No 390 1400 130 120,000 700,000 90 Sodium Diacetate 2. Sprayed 20 10 0 0 0 0 20% SDA 3. Immersed 0 70 0 0 180 0 20% SDA 4. Immersed 10 10 0 0 0 0 30% SDA 5. 0 Brushed 50 0 0 0 0 20% SDA 6. Brushed 0 20 0 0 90 0 30% SDA 7. Dusted 0.2% DRY SDA 200 500 0 0 190 0 The data of Example 9 indicate that the sodium diacetate may be applied to the chicken meat by spraying a solution of sodium diacetate or by immersing the meat in a solution of sodium diacetate or brushing the solution of sodium diacetate on the meat. It might be expected that immersing the meat in a -24- solution of sodium diacetate would give the best coverage. Clearly, however, spraying a solution of sodium diacetate is most efficacious to forestall growth of these three pathogen bacteria species, and thus would be lower cost method if used in a commercial application of this invention. While this invention has been described in connection with the best mode presently contemplated by the inventor for carrying out his invention, the preferred embodiments described are for purposes of illustration only, and are not to be construed as constituting any limitations of the invention. Modifications will be obvious to those skilled in the art, and all modifications that do not depart from the spirit of the invention are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. -25- WE CLAIM: 1. A food product comprising: a. dressed chicken meat selected from the group of (i) a whole dressed chicken and (ii) a dressed chicken part; and b. a coating of sodium diacetate substantially free of an adhesive material that extends along the external surfaces of the dressed chicken, said external meat coating containing at least 0.02% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product, whereby, said food product is rendered substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species. 2. A food product comprising: a. dressed chicken meat selected from the group of (i) a whole dressed chicken and (ii) a dressed chicken part; and b. an agent of sodium diacetate substantially free of an adhesive material combined with the dressed chicken meat, said agent containing at least 0.02% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product, whereby, said food product is rendered substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species. 3. A food product comprising: a. dressed chicken meat selected from the group of (i) a whole dressed chicken and (ii) a dressed chicken part; and b. an agent containing sodium diacetate, said agent being combined with the dressed chicken meat and -26- containing about 0.02% to about 0.099% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product, whereby, said food product is rendered substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species. 4. The food product of claim n-1, wherein the agent contains about 0.02% to about 0.085% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product. 5. The food product of claim n-2, wherein the agent contains about 0.02% to about 0.063% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product. 6. The food product of claim n-3, wherein the agent contains about 0.04% to about 0.085% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product. 7. The food product of claim n-4, wherein the agent contains about 0.04% to about 0.063% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product. 8. The food product of claim n-5, wherein the agent contains about 0.051 % to about 0.085% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product. 9. A food product comprising: a. dressed chicken meat selected from the group of (i) a whole dressed chicken and (ii) a dressed chicken part; and b. an agent containing sodium diacetate, said agent being combined with the dressed chicken meat and containing about 0.02% to about 0.04% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product, whereby, said food product is rendered substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species. 10. A food product comprising: -27- a. dressed chicken meat selected from the group of (i) a whole dressed chicken and (ii) a dressed chicken part; and b. an agent containing sodium diacetate, said agent being combined with the chicken meat and containing about 0.04% to about 0.051 % sodium diacetate by weight of the food product, whereby, said food product is rendered substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species. 11. A food product comprising: a. dressed chicken meat selected from the group of (i) a whole dressed chicken and (ii) a dressed chicken part; and b. an agent containing sodium diacetate, said agent being combined with the dressed chicken meat and containing about 0.051% to about 0.063% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product, whereby, said food product is rendered substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species. 12. A food product comprising: a. dressed chicken meat selected from the group of (i) a whole dressed chicken and (ii) a dressed chicken part; and b. an agent containing sodium diacetate, said agent being combined with the dressed chicken meat and containing about 0.063 % to about 0.085% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product, whereby, said food product is rendered substantially free of -28- pathogenic bacterial species. 13. A food product comprising: a. dressed chicken meat selected from the group of (i) a whole dressed chicken and (ii) a dressed chicken part; and b. an agent containing sodium diacetate, said agent being combined with the dressed chicken meat and containing about 0.085% to about 0.099% sodium diacetate by weight of the food product, whereby, said food product is rendered substantially free of pathogenic bacterial species. 14. A food product which comprises: a. dressed chicken meat selected from the group consisting of i) a whole dressed chicken and ii) a dressed chicken part; and b. a coating of a water solution of sodium diacetate that i) extends across the external surfaces of said dressed chicken meat, ii) is retained on said external surfaces, because of the surface tension of said water solution, after said dressed chicken meat is coated with said solution and is hung freely to permit excess liquid to drain away, and iii) is substantially free of any adhesive material. 15. The food product of claim 14 in which the external surface of said coating of a water solution of sodium diacetate is substantially smooth throughout. 16. The food product of claim 15 in which the sodium diacetate of said water solution is retained in solid form on the external surfaces after the -29- water of said solution has evaporated. 17. The food product of claim 14 which includes a removable casing positioned around said dressed chicken meat and said coating of sodium diacetate water solution. 18. The food product of claim 16 which includes a removable casing positioned around said dressed chicken meat and said dried coating of sodium diacetate. 19. The food product of claim 14 in which the percentage by weight of sodium diacetate in said water solution is from about 0.02% to about 0.099% of the weight of said food product. 20. The food product of claim 18 in which the percentage by weight of sodium diacetate in said water solution is from about 0.02% to about 0.099% of the weight of said food product.

Inventors: GLABE ELMER F, SHUBERT VICTOR H, GLABE, ELMER, F., SHUBERT, VICTOR, H.
Applicants: GLABE ELMER F, SHUBERT VICTOR H, GLABE, ELMER, F., SHUBERT, VICTOR, H.
Application year: 1999
Main classification: A23B4
IPC codes: A23B4, A23L1