APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REDUCING EFFECT OF MOBILE TELEPHONE RADIATION

Abstract: Mobile telephone apparatus (10) is disclosed wherein the antenna (18) is distanced from the user's body (26) to reduce radiation exposure to the user. Preferably the phone is made of two folding parts (12, 14). On one of these parts (12) is mounted a microphone (28) and earpiece (24), and the antenna (18) is placed on the second part (14).

Description: APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REDUCING EFFECT OF MOBILE TELEPHONE RADIATION FIELD OF THE I VENTION The invention relates to a method and apparatus for mobile telephony radiation effect reduction, in particular to methods of reducing the radiation power radiated into a user's head, hand and body and also, though not exclusively, to enhancing the wireless system efficiency and quality. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention concerns wireless handsets, where the number of users is increasing at a very large rate. Such wireless handsets include cellular phones, wireless phones, personal communication and walkie-talkie systems and equipment. Most of these portable devices are held very close to the user's head (and ear) during operation, as typically illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2. The normal distance between the input of the handset antenna, typically, from where most of the radiated energy is developed; typical distances from the handset antenna to the user's head may be only from 1.5 to 3 cm. At these small distances, strong coupling occurs between the handset case, antenna, user's head and hand which may result in up to 60 % of the radiated energy being absorbed within a small volume of the user's head, as described in "Electromagnetic Compatibility Handbook", Chapters 1, & 24 and Appendix H, Editor R. Perez, and published by Academic Press, 1995, and in "EM Interaction of Handset Antennas", by M.A. Jensen and Y. Rahmat Samii, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jan. 1995, pp. 5 - 17. The contents of these documents are hereby incorporated by reference. This undesired RF radiation absorption may influence, enhance or even cause the development of natural or spontaneous head tumors or cancer, as described in "Potential Public Health Risks from Wireless Technology", Scientific Advisory Group on Cellular Telephone Research, Washington DC, August 1994, Editor G.L. Carlo, (Fax number 202-833-2801). The contents of this document is hereby incorporated by reference. Furthermore, this absorption of radiation by the user's body, reduces the efficiency of desired radiation towards the base station which may require increasing the handset transmission power to achieve a high quality communication link, as described by Perez and in "Personal Communication Services, Technology and Health Concerns Modern Radio Science, 1996, pp. 263 - 277, by M.A. Stuchly, hereby incorporated by reference. The significant scientific literature relating to the health hazards resulting from portable cellular or wireless phone, while providing useful information, is inadequate for drawing definitive conclusion about possible health risks. Therefore it is suggested to take precautions and reduce as much as possible, the radiation and the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) reaching the human body, especially in the head region, as discussed in "Mobile Communication Safety", Chapman-Hall, 1997, Editors N. Kuster, Q. Balzano and W.C. Lin,: "Wireless Technology Research (WTR) Public Health Research", Activities June 1993-96, (June 1996), pp. 18, Editor G.L. Carlo; "Electromagnetic Fields 300 Hz to 300 GHz", Environmental Health Criteria 137, The WHO, World Health Organization, Geneva 1993, hereby incorporated by reference. The effects of Portable Cellular Phone Radiation on the Users is quantifiable in terms of the SAR, mentioned above. The SAR is a very convenient unit to measure, simulate and evaluate the radiation health threat to a biological systems and represents the rate of radio frequency (RF) coupling to the biologic object of interest. The SAR indicates the rate at which energy is absorbed by an incremental mass of an exposed object, such as human tissue, divided by the incremental mass. The units of SAR are expressed in Watt/Kg. As defined by Kuster et al. and the WHO, the SAR can be computed using the following relations: (l) SAR = Λ 2 * dV Q) SAR * n * dA where σ and p are the conductivity in mho/m and the specific density in Kg/m Λ 3, E(t) represents the total electric field in a voxel of tissue in (N /m), P ab is the power absorbed in the head and hand model in (Watt) and N represent the volume concerned. C, ΔT, & t represent respectively the specific heat of the tissue in J/(kg, °C), the difference of temperature and the time exposure due to the radiation absorption, respectively. P rad is the radiated power in Watt at far field distances, and A is the area element in m Λ 2, η a is the radiated efficiency of the desired signal. The European and IRPA radiation safety standard have some difference from the AΝSI-IEEE new standards, "American National Standard Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to RF EMF 300 KHz to 100 GHz", ANSI C95.1, The IEEE Inc., New York 1992, and also found in the WHO manual, Kuster, and Carlo, 1996. These disclosures of these documents are hereby incorporated by reference. In the cellular 900 MHz band, the threshold SAR averaged over the whole body should not exceed 0.4 Watt/Kg for exposed workers for an averaging time of 6 minute and 0.08 Watt/Kg for the general population. In case of hands, wrist, feet and ankles radiation absorption, the threshold SAR should nor exceed 4 Watt /Kg for any 10 grams tissue and for more vulnerable tissues, such as in the human head, the radiation should not exceed 2 Watt /Kg or 1.6 Watt / Kg peak SAR, averaged over 1 gram of tissue in reference to the last ANSI / IEEE standard and also in Carlo, 1996. The standard authorities also provide tables of threshold limits for the unperturbed root mean square electric field strength E (Vim), magnetic field strength H(A/m) and equivalent plane wave power density S in mWatt/ cm Λ 2. These threshold values are function of the radiation frequency range due to the resonant frequency of an average human body. For the cellular frequency range of 900MHZ, concerning general population exposure limit to RF fields the threshold S, is f(MHz)/2000 on 0.45 mWatt /cm Λ 2 related to IRPA and 0.30 mWatt / cm A 2 related to IEEE/ ANSI standards; double values for the PCS, and the future cellular band of 1800 MHz. In the 55 MHz range, used for the indoor home wireless phone, the general population threshold limits is 0.2 mWatt/cm A 2, related to IRPA and 10/f(MHz) or 0.18 mWatt / cm A 2 related to ANSI /IEEE standard, as in the WHO standards and "CENELEC Readies Provisional Rad-Hazard Requirement", Newswatch EMC, Compliance Eng. European Ed., April 1995, pp. 60 - 64, hereby incorporated by reference. The present cellular handset transmitter power ranges extend from 0.2 to 6 Watt. The power range generates non-ionizing radiation, with a minor increase in the body or head temperature. However recent models, as described by Carlo 1994, Newswatch and "Numerical and Experimental Procedure for SAR Distributions Due to Mobile Telephones: an Overview", EMC Int. Symp. Proceedings Tutorial Roma 9.96, by G. Lazzi, Om P. Gandhi, pp. 79 -86, hereby incorporated by reference, postulate that even Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) may change the biologic cellular growth control mechanism and for the human head may change the blood brain permeability. Groups of Swedish and Australia scientists recently reported, that amplitude modulated (AM), RF energy could affect the blood brain barriers of exposed users by a mechanism different than simple heating. Calcium effects and the increase of the head cellular division rate from low power level RF radiation, which may not produce cancer, but may influence or enhance the development of natural and spontaneous carcinogram tumors, which may develop into cancer. Thus the newer generation of digital portable phone, using TDMA or CDMA multiplexing techniques, include low frequency Amplitude modulation (AM) signals (bursts), which may therefore be a threat to health, are superior to the older AMPS or NAMPS, which use analog frequency modulation methods, Carlo, 1994. Furthermore, it is possible that in the future, the SAR threshold limit standard will become more severe especially for the human head affected by novel cellular portable phones using digital modulation techniques, Kuster 1997. Thus, in conclusion it is useful and important to reduce, by as much as possible, the SAR to the human body, especially to the user's head, without affecting significantly the link quality of cellular phone. The classical wire antennas for most cellular and wireless phone handsets are as follows: Short (whip) monopole λ/4 3λ/8 λ/2. These antennas may also operate as a vertical dipole and the helix antenna, as described by Lazzi et, al, and in "Radiowave Propagation and Antennas for Personal Communication", by K. Siwiak, Artech-House, 1995, hereby incorporated by reference. The shortest and the most compact are the helix and the λ/4 monopole, of Jensen & R. Sammii 1995, the desired radiation diagram is similar to omnidirectional in the azimuth plane as required. However, when the handset antenna is close to the user's ear most of the energy, up to 60%, is absorbed in the head, characterized by the excessive SAR as shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The worst absorption and lowest desired radiation efficiency occur for the helix antenna. Less absorption and higher desired radiation efficiency are obtained using the monopole 3λ/8 and dipole λ/2 antennas. However, these antennas are significantly longer and more complex, and the SAR and RF power absorption are still significant, as shown by Jensen & R. Sammii 1995. and Lazzi and P. Gandhi 1996. In a few cases, sleeve dipoles are used, which avoid RF currents on the metallic part of the handset and improve slightly the desired radiation efficiency, Siwiak 1995. More recently, printed circuit antennas were invented for cellular and PCS handsets. A lot of scientific and technologic efforts are devoted for the development of cellular handset printed antennas, such as Siwiak 1995, "Analytical and Numerical Analysis of Antennas for Hand-Held Mobile Telephones, by I. Shtrikman, PH. D. Thesis, Kassel Sept. 1997, pp. 123, and "Folded Loop Antenna for Mobile Hand-Held Units, by K.D. Katsibas, C.A. Balanis, P.A. Tirkas, and C.R. Birtcher, IEEE on AP, Vol. 46, No. 2, Feb. 1998, pp. 260 - 266 , hereby incorporated by reference. A September 97 Doctoral Thesis by I Strikman, hereby incorporated by reference, presented a dual meandering antenna (DMA) originating from the dual L antenna (DLA), whereby the two L formed elements are twisted so that the whole antenna is located farther away from the user hand and head, Strikman, 1997. The DMA antenna was designed for the 1800 MHZ band where it is shown that the absorbed SAR in the head is reduced by a factor of 6-7.7 dB in comparison to a monopole antenna and η a = 72% instead of 55%. However, the hand user absorption SAR is still higher then for the monopole and at the 900 MHZ band; thus the DMA advantages are less favorable. An IEEE transactions paper published in February 98, by the group of Professor Balanis, from Arizona University, , hereby incorporated by reference, suggested a vertical folded loop wired or printed antenna with parasitic loading to enhance operation bandwidth. This antenna can operate as a dual 900 and 1800 MHZ bandwidth with less influence from the user's hand. However the absorbed head and hand SAR and the η a have not yet been published, Katsibas et al. 1998. A few antenna manufacturing companies propose the use of a shielding device between the handset and the user. However, it is not very convenient and may be placed in the same category as the "hand-free" cellular system in cars, "The Use of Flexible Shielding Materials to Reduce the EM Coupling", by J. Cartrysse, URSI General Assembly Proceedings, Lille, Sept. 1996, PPEK 3.659, , hereby incorporated by reference. SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION The present invention seeks to provide an improved mobile telephone apparatus in which body exposure to radiation is reduced. According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided mobile telephone apparatus comprising a handset having a first part and a second part foldably attached to said first part, to provide a folded state and an open state of said handset, and comprising a transmission aerial located along said first part and further comprising a speaker and an earpiece not being located along said first part. The speaker and earpiece may both be located on the second part, or one may be located on the second part and the other on a third part. The aerial may thus be distanced from the earpiece such that exposure of the user's head to radiation from the aerial is reduced. An amplifier is associated with said transmission aerial and in an embodiment the amplifier is located along said first part. In an alternative embodiment it is located in the second part. The first part preferably includes a shielding layer which is located on said first part such that in said open state it lies between said antenna and a user so as to shield said user from radiation emitting from said aerial. The transmission aerial may comprise a transmission part and a reception part. The aerial may be extendible from said first part, to improve operation. The aerial may alternatively be a radiating patch antenna. The first part forms, in one embodiment, the upper part thereof when in use in the open state. In a second embodiment it forms the lower part thereof when in use in the open state. The aerial may be enclosed within said first part. According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided cellular telephone apparatus comprising: a cellular telephone instrument including first and second parts which are hinged together, the apparatus having a first configuration in which the first and second parts are folded one over the other and a second configuration in which the first and second parts are opened away from each other, wherein the first part includes an aerial and wherein the second part includes a speaker and a microphone. In a preferred embodiment the first part comprises a proximal section which is proximal to a user's head when the cellular apparatus is in an in use orientation, and a distal section which is remote from the user's head when the cellular apparatus is in use and wherein the aerial is located within said distal section. Preferably the two parts of the headset are generally planar. In an embodiment the first part has edges which are bent away from said user when said apparatus is in an in use orientation. According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided mobile telephone apparatus having a first part and a second part pivotally attached to said first part to define an open state and a closed state of said apparatus, further having an aerial extendibly mounted on said first part such that when extended and said apparatus is in said open state, said aerial is shielded from a user by said second part, said second part being substantially opaque to electromagnetic radiation of a frequency range used by said apparatus. In a preferred embodiment the second part comprises an insert of material substantially transparent to electromagnetic radiation of said frequency range. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS. The present invention will be understood and appreciated from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the following drawings, in which: Fig. 1 illustrates a prior art SAR radiation map of a flip phone with a collapsed antenna; Fig. 2 illustrates a prior art SAR radiation map of a flip phone with an extended antenna; Fig. 3 illustrates a prior art StarTAC mobile phone ; Fig. 4 shows the radiation map of the mobile phone according to the first preferred embodiment of the present invention; Figs. 5 and 6 show the side and front view, respectively, of the mobile phone according to a first preferred embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 7 illustrates a side view of the fold-over antenna set cover according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention; Figs. 8 and 9 illustrate the dual feed λ/4 patch and dual feed double λ/4 patch devices; Figs. 10 and 11 show the side and front view, respectively, of the mobile phone according to the second preferred embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 12 shows the radiation map of the mobile phone according to a second preferred embodiment of the present invention; Figs. 13 and 14 illustrate the dual feed patch antenna polarization configuration for a dielectric value of ε r =10.3; Figs. 15 and 16 show the side and front view, respectively, of the mobile phone according to the third preferred embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 17 shows the radiation map of the mobile phone according to a third preferred embodiment of the present invention; Figs.18 and 19 show the side and front view, respectively, of the mobile phone according to yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention. Fig. 20 shows the radiation map of the mobile phone of Figs. 18 and 19. Figs. 21 and 22 show the mobile phone of Figs. 18 and 19 in a closed and open orientation; and Figs. 23 and 24 show the side and front view, respectively, of a mobile phone according to still another preferred embodiment of the present invention; DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Reference is now made to Figs. 4 to 6, which illustrate a side view and front view, respectively, of a two piece mobile phone 10 constructed and operative according to a first preferred embodiment of the present invention. The mobile phone 10 comprises a handset 12 and a fold-over cover antenna set 14 housed in a plastic case 15. The handset 12 and antenna set 14 are pivotally connected to each other so that the antenna set 14 folds over the handset 12 to serve as a cover and to place the phone in an active mode when the cover is open and in an inactive mode when the cover is folded over the headset 12. . The handset comprises a keyboard 16, an earphone 24 and a microphone 28. The antenna set 14 is housed in a plastic case 15 and comprises a transmission antenna 18. such as a microstrip compact Special Printed Antenna A microstrip compact Special Printed Antenna, such as a patch antenna can be used. It is printed on the back side of the antenna set 14 and is protected by a thin plating of plastic 20, acting as a radome (see fig.7). A series of typical antenna radiation patterns 22 are shown in Figs. 4 and 6. The handset 12 also comprises an earphone device 24 to enable a user 26 to listen to received transmissions. The user 26 speaks into a microphone 28 and may call-up other users by pressing the appropriate keys on the keyboard 16. Power to the mobile phone 10 is provided by a battery 30, which is typically fixed to the rear side of the handset 12 (Fig. 4).A metallic ground 34 is fixed to the front side of the antenna set 14, significantly reduces the radiation reaching the user 26. The typical fold-over antenna set 14 is illustrated in Fig. 7 A dielectric partition 46 separates between the Special Printed Antenna 18 and the metallic ground 34. The partition is of the same thickness as the antenna, that is to say of typically 0.035mm. The metallic ground 34 and housing 15 slightly overlap the antenna 18 and dielectric partition 46. Typical dimensions of the printed antenna 18 are given in Figs. 8, 9, 13, and 14. As shown in Figs. 8 and 9, the patch antenna surface 18, of the antenna set 14, is dual fed via two adjacent sides. The sides are of effective lengths respectively of a quarter wave λ/4 for the center receiving (RX) frequency range, and of λ/2 or λ/4 for the center transmitting (TX) frequency. This dual side orthogonal feed enables the operation of the narrow bandwidth λ/4 short circuit edge printed patch antenna and increases selectivity of the TX output, reduces noise and increases the sensitivity of the RX front end. To operate the handset 12, the user 26 opens the mobile phone 10 by pivoting the antenna set 14 to the open position, as illustrated by arrow 50. The radiating patch antenna 18, is distanced from the head and the body of user 26 and this also significantly increases the distance of the user's head and hand from the radiating antenna 18. The radiation patterns 22 illustrated in Fig. 6 demonstrate the reduction in radiation reaching the user 26. For maximum power reception, the user 26 may change his position, in a direction towards a base station (not shown), by typically using an internal indicator (not shown) located on the handset 12. In this position, the user 26 is now ready to receive transmissions at the handset 12 with the highest efficiency. .For transmitting, the user 26 typically pushes a send button (not shown) to feed the linear vertical polarization patch antenna 18 from the TX power amplifier stage (not shown). The advantage of the present invention over the prior art handsets, is the reduced electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and SAR to the body of the user 26, and especially to the user's head and hand. The EMR and SAR at the head and body are significantly reduced in comparison to prior art monopole antennas, PIFA and other prior art printed circuit antennas. In the present invention, as shown in figures 4 to 6, the distance between the user's head and the antenna 18 is significantly increased, typically from 10 to 15 cm, instead of 2 to 4 cm, as in the prior art antenna devices. Typically, a 200 dB (theoretical) isolation is achieved due to the metallic ground plate 34 inserted on the inside of the antenna set 14. A typical thickness of the ground plate 34 is 35μm. In practice, however, the isolation of the user's head and hand from the radiation, is reduced by the limited area of the substrate of the antenna set 14. The antenna set 14 may enhance diffraction and reflection of the antenna's radiated power which is partly directed towards the user's head and body. However, a slight bending of the edges 51 of the metallic ground 34 directs part of the radiation energy away from the user, so as to reduce diffraction from the radiating area of the antenna set 14. Bending is however only required for very small dimension handsets. By unfolding the mobile phone 10 through pivoting the antenna set 14, the distance between the radiating patch antenna and the SAR reaching the user's hand is also significantly increased, in comparison to prior art handset devices, which use PIFA or other printed antennas. In these type of prior art handsets, users are known to suffer from high radiation absorption, in particular through the hand. Furthermore, the far field antenna radiation power and efficiency are typically enhanced, in a direction towards the base station, due to the reduced radiative coupling between the antenna element and the user's body, hand and head, and the higher gain of the dual feed λ/4 patch antenna related to the monopole ,PIFA and other classical handset antennas Typical patch antenna dimensions for the north American AMPS or DAMPS cellular phones are presented in Figs. 8 and 9. For typical mobile phone transmissions in the 800 MHz, frequency range, a high dielectric constant substrate is required The length, L, of a preferably rectangular λ/4 antenna patch, short circuited at one side, may be calculated by the equation: C 1.5cm L = 4 *f *J&7 q f(GHz) * ^ q Typically, for an available dielectric constant ε r = 4.3, dielectric thickness 2 mm, ε re q = 4 , and for a typical AMPS headset transmitter TX, f=0.83 Ghz. Thus the typical dimensions of the dual feed λ/4 patch antenna are approximately 42 x 90 mm, as shown in Fig. 8. Using a two rectangular side short-circuited to ground. (Fig. 9), the dimensions of a dual feed double λ/4 patch antenna may be reduced to only 42 x 45 mm. However the radiation efficiency, gain and bandwidth of the smaller area patch antenna are reduced. The physical dimension can be further reduced by using a substrate with a higher dielectric constant, for instance ε r =10.3 or with even higher values. However the market price of such dielectric materials is higher and furthermore such substrates result in reduced antenna gain and bandwidth. The dimensions of typical GSM headsets may be even further reduced due to their higher operational frequency ranges, TX ranges are from about 890 to 915 MHz, and RX are from about 935 to 960 MHz. For the newer and higher 1800/1900 MHz frequency bands, the headset dual feed patch antenna dimensions may be significantly smaller but without a reduction in antenna gain and bandwidth. The SAR and radiation efficiency measurements are very complex and require special anachoid chambers, probes and precise phantom models of the human head ,hand and body. There is a very strong interaction between the antenna, the handset box and the human body and determining such an interaction is very complex due to the near field conditions, as described in "Electromagnetic Compatibility Handbook", Chapters 1, 19, 20, 24 and Appendix H, Editor R. Perez, and published by Academic Press, 1995. Thus computational techniques such as extrapolation methods may be needed to produce results that can then be used for determining and comparing the radiation values of the present invention with other prior art antenna systems. In the 900 MHz band (λ= 33 cm) and even in the higher 1800 MHz band (λ= 16.5 cm), the complex near field conditions occur up to dπ <2 λ. Typical computation and simulation, in the near field, require complex software tools such as the FDTD, FIT code and the European MAFIA package, "MAFIA 4-Simulation for Radiation Effects on the Environment Include the Human Body", CST-News, Volume 6, Jan. 1988, pp. 1 - 4, hereby incorporated by reference and I Strickman, thesis, Sept 1997. The prior art λ/4 classical monopole has an average distance, between handset and user's head, of dπ of 2 cm which results in a peak SAR of 2 Watt/Kg and a low η a of 47 % . For the antenna of the present invention, the average distance, d H , from the user's head is approximately 12 cm. The present invention gives a peak SAR of less than about 0.05 Watt/Kg and η a of 80 %. Thus the reduction in radiation is about a factor of 40 (16 dB). In comparison to the back mounted PIFA antenna, the reduction achieved by the present Special Printed Antenna is approximately 28 (14.5 dB), which is a significant improvement with respect to radiation protection. This improvement is significant considering the large reduction in the user hand absorption for the Special Printed Antenna, of the present invention, in comparison with the PIFA and other printed antenna data, as given in "EM Interaction of Handset Antennas", by M.A. Jensen and Y. Rahmat Samii, Proceeding of the IEEE, Jan. 1995, pp. 5 - 17, and also in "Radiowave Propagation and Antennas for Personal Communication", by I. Shtrikman, PH. D. Thesis Kassel, Sept. 1997, pp. 123, and in K Siwiak, "Radiowave Propagation and Antennas for Personal Communication" Artech House, 1995. The results given in "Personal Communication Services, Technology and Health Concerns: Is there a common solution", Modern Radio Science 1996, pp. 263 - 277, show that for the λ/4 classical monopole antenna, a transmission TX power output P t = 1 Watt, at 900 MHz band for d H =1.5 cm, the SAR is 2.6 Watt /Kg, for d H =2 cm 1.7 Watt/Kg, and for d H =3 cm 1.2 Watt/Kg [5]. As above, extrapolating these results to the present invention, for a typical value of dπ =12 cm, provides an improvement of more than 20 (13 dB). Recent measurements, published in "Electromagnetic Radiation from Portable Radio, Wireless Cellular and Walkie-Talkie" by M. Netzer, The Israeli Electrical Engineering Bulletin, Nov. 1996, pp. 41 - 46 , hereby incorporated by reference, give the power density S at the user head from a Panasonic™ cordless phone for several distances, namely at dH = 2 cm, S = 0.3 mWatt cm Λ 2 and for d H =10 cm , S = 0.015 mWatt/cm Λ 2. The improvement achievable using an embodiment of the present is a factor of more than 30 (15 dB). From radio propagation theory, the reduction in S and the related SAR, are a function of the distance, dπ Λ 2 to du A 4. These reductions are larger in the near field Fresnel radiation zone and beyond this zone. If, for example, the median distance increases from du =2 cm to dH =10 cm, the Special Printed Antenna , installed in the mobile phone antenna set cover, results in a decrease in S and SAR by a factor of 5 A 2 to 5 A 4 or from 14 to 28 dB or more. Thus, the extrapolated value of 15 dB as discussed previously is very conservative and may even be significantly higher. Thus, the application of an embodiment of the Special Printed Antenna, installed in a typical mobile phone of the present invention, gives, in the frequency band of 900 MHz, a reduction (improvement) in the radiation at the user's head of a factor greater than 40 (16 dB) in radiation in comparison to the 1/4 classical monopole. In comparison to the PIFA and other new printed circuits antennas, the reduction (improvement) is also very significant and the user hand absorption is significantly less for embodiments of our new printed antenna installed in the antenna set. Embodiments of the present invention may thus provide a significant reduction in the EMF and SAR at the user's head, hand and body. Reference is now made to Figs. 10 to 12, which illustrate a mobile phone 200 constructed and operative according to a second preferred embodiment of the present invention. The second preferred embodiment, is similar in construction and operation to the first embodiment described hereinabove, and thus its detailed description is not repeated here. In the second embodiment the Special Printed Antenna is located "above" the handset. In this second embodiment, the antenna set 214, comprises a microstrip compact Special Printed Antenna 218, printed on the backside of the antenna set 214 and is protected by a thin plating of plastic 20, acting as a radome, and by a thin metallic ground plate 34 (Fig.7). A series of typical antenna radiation patterns 222 are illustrated in Figs. 10 and 12 showing that only a small amount of the transmitted radiation reaches the user. Reference is now made to Figs. 15, 16, and 17, which illustrate a handset 300 constructed and operative according to a third embodiment of the present invention. The third embodiment, is similar in construction and operation to the first embodiment described hereinabove, and thus its detailed description is not repeated here. In the third embodiment, it is possible to enhance the communication link quality, and signal to (noise + interference), ( S/N+I ), by using a downlink polarization diversity principle. This is obtained by adding a simple monopole or helix antenna 302 "above" the handset 300.The antenna 302 is used for reception only, and is thus free from additional SAR contribution to the user head and body, as illustrated in Fig. 15. Both the prior art and the new antenna set with the printed antennas, as described herein, can be used for reception from the cellular base stations. This down link diversity option enhances reception quality especially due to polarization diversity, and is most efficient for the relatively small distances between the two antennas. Additionally, this down link diversity enhances most urban or indoor situations, when in extreme cases reception, S/N statistics are poor and the original transmitted signal polarization is disturbed. Polarization diversity can be obtained when a prior art antenna is in a vertical orientation and the patch RX feed, of the present invention, is horizontally polarized. The antenna polarization diversity advantage may improve the link quality, even when using reduced base station TX power This is very useful for environmental and spectrum management policy. The communication link quality may be further improved by adding up-link polarization diversity if two orthogonal microstrip patches antenna, 304 and 306, are used separately for TX and RX, as shown in Figs. 16 and 17. In Figs. 13 and 14, half of the handset TX power amplifier (PA) (not shown) output is directed to each orthogonal TX antenna feed, 308 and 310, via a high efficiency 3 decibels (half power) coupler, 312. The resulting enhanced reception at the base station due to the uplink diversity may enable reduction of the handset TX power output and an increase of the battery life time between charges. The RX handset circuit chooses, via a simple switch (not shown), the strongest of the two orthogonal polarized desired signal inputs. This enhances handset reception sensitivity and may even enable reduction in base station TX power levels. The diversity improvements may also be advantageous for spectrum management by reducing risks of mutual interference with other users and for reducing additional health hazards by significantly reducing the resultant SAR for users and passers by, in the neighborhood of the head, hand and body. The present printed dual polarization diversity circuits typically use a substrate with a dielectric of values approximately ε r =10.3. From the above equations, practical antenna set minimum dimensions of 48 * 65 mm may be derived for various of the embodiments. For handsets working in the 1800/1900 MHz bands, the physical dimensions are typically reduced by a factor of more than 2. Thus, using the dual polarization diversity a lower cost substrate may be used, such as a substrate with a value of ε r =4.3. Such a substrate may provide higher TX gain, efficiency and lower SAR than for the 800/900 MHz frequency band. Reference is now made to Figs. 18 to 20, which illustrate a handset 400 constructed and operative according to another embodiment of the present invention. This embodiment, is similar in construction and operation to the second embodiment described hereinabove, and thus its detailed description is not repeated here. In this embodiment of the present invention, a Mobile Phone 400, comprises a lower handset 402 and an upper fold-over antenna set 404. An antenna 406 may be folded into the upper antenna set 404 when the phone is not in use, as illustrated in Figs. 21 and 22. The vertical λ/4 monopole antenna 406 is preferably fed at the top of the antenna set 404 of the phone 400. Mouthpiece and earpiece are preferably located on the handset 402, thus encouraging the user to distance himself from the antenna. The embodiment shown in Figs. 18 to 22 is useful for a handset, whose dimension in a closed position may be larger then 9 cm, and the printed or monopole radiation antennas are located above the user's head. This embodiment reduces by a further factor the SAR at the user's head and additionally improves the desired signal power level, in open and especially in rural areas. Typically, the antenna set 404 uses the dual polarization diversity in a similar way as described hereinabove with respect to the third embodiment. However in this embodiment, the prior art λ/4 classical monopole antenna may be stored in the antenna set 404, further away from the user, as illustrated in Figs. 21 and 22, and is only erected when the upper part is opened, Fig 18. For longer handsets it may be sufficient to use a prior art λ/4 monopole antenna 406 fed at the top of the antenna set 404 even without a Printed Circuit Antenna, as shown in previous embodiments. Such a configuration results in a reduction in the SAR to less than 0.075 w/Kg, which is equivalent to a reduction of more then 20 (13 dB). The reduction in the SAR reaching a user's head is significant due to the antenna being located at the top of the antenna set 404 of the mobile phone 400. The radiation efficiency towards the base station is thus also significantly improved both for reception and transmission. . Reference is now made to Figs. 23 and 24, which illustrate a mobile phone 500 constructed and operative according to yet another embodiment of the present invention. The sixth embodiment, is similar in construction and operation to the first and second embodiments described hereinabove, and thus its detailed description is not repeated here. In this embodiment, a reduction of the SAR at the user's head of about 20 (13 dB), in comparison to a classical λ/4 monopole antenna, is achieved by controlling the thickness of the flip cover shielding attenuation. For small handsets, it is preferable to use a printed antenna installed in the lower part of the flip cover, and to control the printed antenna shielding efficiency. It is thus possible to achieve reduced transmission and reception radiation levels towards the user's body. It is also possible to provide a small hole in the shielding to allow a small amount of radiation to penetrate in the direction towards the body. This is important only in open areas (which lack buildings to reflect the radiation) for the cases when the useful base station is located in the direction shadowed by the user body. It will thus be appreciated that in the prior art mobile phones a significant part of the transmitted radiation is absorbed by the user's head, especially in proximity to the ear. In the above-described embodiments the radiation source is removed from the head, allowing for a reduction of more than 13dB in body exposure. The dimensions of the phone nevertheless remain small, particularly in the folded, standby, state. The radiation may further be more efficiently directed at the base station, since losses due to absorption by the user's body are reduced. It is appreciated that various features and modifications of the mobile phone of the invention are possible. Thus the StarTac type folding phone can be modified accordingly by placing the antenna as far away as possible from the earpiece when the phone is unfolded. Similarly, various features of the invention which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment may also be provided separately or in any suitable subcombination. It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention is defined only by the claims that follow:

Claims: Claims 1. Mobile telephone apparatus comprising a handset having a first part and a second part foldably attached to said first part, to provide a folded state and an open state of said handset, and comprising a transmission aerial located along said first part and further comprising a microphone and an earpiece not being located along said first part. 2. Mobile telephone apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said microphone and said earpiece are located along said second part. 3. Mobile telephone apparatus according to claim 1 wherein an amplifier is associated with said transmission aerial and wherein said amplifier is located along said first part. 4. Mobile telephone apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said first part includes a shielding layer and wherein said shielding layer is located on said first part such that in said open state it lies between said antenna and a user so as to shield said user from radiation emitting from said aerial. 5. Mobile telephone apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said transmission aerial comprises a transmission part and a reception part. 6. Mobile telephone apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said aerial is extendible from said first part. 7. Mobile telephone apparatus according to claim 1 wherein the aerial is a radiating patch antenna. 8. Mobile telephone apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first part forms the upper part thereof when in use in the open state. 9. Mobile telephone apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first part forms the lower part thereof when in use in the open state. 10. Mobile telephone apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said aerial is enclosed within said first part. 11. A mobile telephone apparatus (10) comprising: a handset (12) and a fold-over antenna set (14) pivotally attached thereto, said handset (12) comprising an earpiece (24) and a microphone (28), said antenna set (14) comprising a housing (15) containing a transmission antenna (28), whereby the handset (12) and antenna set (14) can be pivotally folded over one another to form an inoperable folded mode and an operable unfolded mode, and whereby when the mobile telephone is unfolded in the operable mode, the earpiece is distanced from the transmission antenna by at least 6 centimeters. 12. A mobile telephone apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the transmission antenna is shielded from the user's head. 13. A mobile telephone apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the antenna set has an expandable antenna. 14. A mobile telephone apparatus as in Claim 11, wherein the transmission antenna is distanced from the earpiece, when the telephone is in the operating mode, between 8 - 16 centimeters. 15. A mobile phone apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the radiation level in proximity to said earpiece is reduced by at least ten per cent. 16. A mobile phone apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the radiation level in proximity to said earpiece is reduced by at least twenty per cent. 17. A mobile phone apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the radiation level in proximity to said earpiece is reduced by at least fifty per cent. 18. A mobile phone apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the radiation level in proximity to said earpiece is reduced by at least ninety per cent. 19. A mobile phone apparatus according to Claim 11, having a keyboard (16) in the handset. 20. A mobile telephone apparatus comprising: a two part fold-over mobile phone set wherein one part pivotally covers the other part, one part containing an earpiece and optionally a microphone and/or keyboard, the other part containing a microphone and/or keyboard if not contained in the one part, said other part containing a transmission antenna at the other end of the pivot point, whereby when the mobile telephone is unfolded the earpiece is distanced from the transmission antenna by at least 8 centimeters. 21. A method of reducing the radiation effect of mobile telephones, comprising: providing a two part fold-over mobile telephone apparatus having an earpiece in one part and a transmitting antenna in the other part, a microphone and keyboard being in either one or the other part, wherein the transmitting antenna is distanced from the earpiece when the phone is unfolded by at least 8 cm.

Inventors: GAVAN JACOB, ZILBERBERG DAVID, GAVAN, JACOB, ZILBERBERG, DAVID
Applicants: GAVAN JACOB, ZILBERBERG DAVID, GAVAN, JACOB, ZILBERBERG, DAVID
Application year: 1999
Main classification: H01Q1
IPC codes: H01Q1, H04M1