Novel heparin binding peptides

Abstract: The present invention provides heparin antagonist peptides. The heparin-binding peptides of the present invention specifically neutralize heparin's conventional anticoagulant properties without causing deleterious hemodynamic side-effects or exacerbation of the proliferative vascular response to injury. More specifically, the heparin-binding compounds of the present invention are short-duration drugs to be used in elective or emergency situations which can safely and specifically neutralize heparin's conventional anticoagulant properties without causing deleterious hemodynamic side-effects or exacerbation of the proliferative vascular response to injury.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention provides heparin binding peptides for cardiovascular applications. More specifically, the present invention provides a peptide sequence, which is designed to bind heparin and make a stable heparin/peptide complex, and antagonize the biological action(s) of heparin. The compound of the present invention is useful as drugs given systemically (like protamine) or regionally or topically to antagonize or neutralize the anticoagulant activity of heparin. The compound of the present invention is also useful in replacing protamine in insulin formulations for administration to diabetics. 2. Description of the Related Art Heparin is a polydisperse, sulfated polysaccharide composed of alternating residues of N-glucoseamine and uranic acid (1). By nature of its synthesis, there is variability in the type of sugar backbone (iduronic vs. glucuronic acid), as well as in the degree and location of sulfated residues. Pharmaceutical grade heparin contains species which range in molecular weight from 6,000 to 20,000, and it is estimated that about 30 % of the heparin by weight accounts for all its anticoagulant properties. Heparin, however, possesses numerous other biological properties, including the ability to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation (2), to catalyze lipoprotein lipase, to bind to endothelial cells, and to inhibit the interaction of von Willebrand factor (VWF) with platelets (3). Successful therapies based on these other activities have not yet been possible, mainly because the doses required to effect these other biological actions are associated with excessive anticoagulation. Nonetheless, it is well documented that heparin's ability to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation is distinct from its anticoagulant effects (2). Heparin sulfate resembles heparin, but it is only poorly sulfated and has low anticoagulant activity. Dermatan sulfate, is also less sulfated than heparin and contains galactosamine in the saccharide backbone. Some of the residual anticoagulant properties of these latter two heparioids has been attributed to their catalysis of heparin cofactor H, rather than antithrombin III (6). However, the principal route of heparin anticoagulation is mediated through its interaction with antithrombin III (AT III). Heparin binding to protein domains. Complexation with heparin induces a conformational change in many proteins including ATIII (7-12), fibroblast growth factor (13,14), and mucous proteinase inhibitor (15). The guiding principle of heparin-protein interactions is that specific chemical unit structures within the heparin polymer bind tightly to structurally complementary specific domains within proteins (16-19). The present inventors have shown that the heparin binding domain of von Willebrand factor or AIII can be wholly replicated with synthetic peptides (16-21). Margalit et al (22) used a molecular modeling analysis of heparin binding domain sequences of proteins and peptides in the data base and showed that the spatial distribution of basic amino acids in all these heparin binding sequences conform to a motif wherein two basic residues (generally Arg) are separated by about 20 Å facing opposite directions of an α-helix or β-strand structure. Other cationic residues are interspersed between these two residues. Heparin may bind by wrapping itself around the peptide backbone, forming a coiled coil-like structure. Such a complex might easily induce a change in protein/peptide conformation. Fan et al., (23) and Tyler-Cross et al. (21) showed by mutational replacement and chemical synthesis strategies, respectively, that particular cationic residues within antithrombin III are essential for recognition and binding of heparin at the high affinity site; replacement or modification of these residues results in proteins (or peptides) which no longer bind heparin. The present inventors (21) suggested that ATIII Geneva, a naturally occurring mutant protein whose carriers display a predisposition toward thrombosis, results from a mutation of an essential Arg residue to Gin residue (24), which causes an unfavorable distortion in the conformation assumed by the heparin binding domain sequence. The Need for a Heparin Antidote . Heparin is used to render the blood incoagulable during open heart surgery, extracorporeal circulation, peripheral vascular surgery, percutaneous angioplasty and a multitude of other acute vascular interventions. Bleeding complications from heparin are especially common when the arterial tree is violated, occurring in as many as 10-15% of cases. Because of the toxicity and side effects of the only available antagonist, protamine, its use is primarily restricted to open heart surgery and emergencies. In most other acute, arterial applications of heparin, the anticoagulant effects are allowed to wane spontaneously over several hours. Many additional bleeding complications from heparin could be avoided if the anticoagulation caused by heparin could be more safely and tightly controlled. Thus, a heparin antidote is needed both to replace protamine and to use in more general applications where the toxicity of protamine has been prohibitive. Protamine and its Problems . The protamines, purified from fish (salmon) sperm, are a family of basic proteins rich in Arginine residues (25). Protamine neutralizes all of heparin's biologic effects by overwhelming the carbohydrate with cationic charges (26-28). The efficacy of protamine for heparin neutralization is thus related in part, to its total net cationic charge, but unfortunately, the toxicity of protamine is also related to its high charge density (29). Protamine administration is heparinized humans can frequently cause hypotension, pulmonary artery hypertension, myocardial depression, complement activation, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia (30-36). Fatalities have been reported (37). In cardiopulmonary bypass, protamine reversal of heparin is so essential that numerous clinical strategies have been devised to avoid side effects by administration in small or divided doses. This is a testament to the great clinical importance of this heparin antagonist. In spite of its poor therapeutic/toxic ratio, protamine has been used since 1939 (38) as the sole heparin antagonist available to clinicians. Because endogenous and exogenous heparins can inhibit the proliferation of smooth muscle cells at sites of vascular injury (39-41), protamine is now implicated in another deleterious side effect. Edelman et al. (42) showed that protamine infusion negated the beneficial inhibitory effects of heparin on smooth muscle cell proliferation, and protamine alone exacerbated the proliferative response. These studies were performed in cell culture, and confirmed in whole animal studies. In each situation, they found that protamine negates the beneficial antiproliferative effects of heparin. Thus, protamine may actually distort normal vascular repair by binding heparin or endogenous heparin-like molecules. These results argue strongly against the continued clinical use of protamine. In the setting of vascular injury or manipulation, such as arterial bypass or angioplasty, protamine administration may be especially harmful, leading to intimal hyperplasia, premature stenosis and thrombosis. A superior heparin antagonist is thus badly needed - one with more selective biologic actions and an improved safety profile. There is growing commercial interest in safe protamine replacement drugs which would be used as heparin antagonists in elective or emergency procedures following cardiovascular surgery. In principal, this drug should specifically neutralize heparin's conventional anticoagulant properties without causing deleterious hemodynamic side-effects or exacerbation of the proliferative vascular response to injury. The clinician's willingness to use Recombinant Platelet Factor 4 as a potential heparin antagonist is currently being assessed (43). Unfortunately, even though recombinant platelet factor 4 is effective in reversing heparin anticoagulation in the rat (44), in some non-rodent species its use caused severe adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, and acute pulmonary vasoconstriction and hypertension, presumably associated with thromboxane release into the circulation (45). Moreover, platelet factor 4 has been identified as the definitive immunogen which complexes with heparin to cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (54-56). This syndrome of immune sensitization to heparin (when complexed to platelet factor 4) is widely feared as it is associated with major morbidity and mortality. These new findings have arisen since the initial efforts to develop platelet factor 4 as a Protamine replacement, and raise serious questions as to its potential clinical use. In yet another approach, Wakefield et al (46), continue to examine proteolytically derived fragments of protamine as potential Protamine replacement drugs. It is yet not clear whether relatively high molecular weight fragments derived from protamine will be less toxic than protamine itself, or whether such fragments can be produced on a commercial scale as potential pharmaceutics. Nor have they attempted to engineer any selectivity or specificity in their protamine substitutes. WO 97/47 312 A1 describes heparin binding peptides which neutralize heparin's conventional anticoagulant properties. A world-wide market clearly exists for a safe protamine replacement which would be a heparin antagonist for use following cardiovascular surgery, and in other applications. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, a major object of the present invention is to provide a heparin antagonist drug for cardiovascular applications. The heparin-binding compound of the present invention specifically neutralizes heparin's conventional anticoagulant properties without causing deleterious hemodynamic side-effects or exacerbation of the proliferative vascular response to injury. More specifically, the heparin-binding compound of the present invention is a short-duration, intravenous drug to be used in elective or emergency situations which can safely and specfically neutralize heparin's conventional anticoagulant properties without causing deleterious hemodynamic side-effects or exacerbation of the proliferative vascular response to injury. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1. Structures of Bis-Arg Helix #2 (Fig. 1A), Tris-Arg Helix #3 (Fig. 1B), and Tetra-Arg Helix #3 (Fig. 1C). Figure 2. Structure of Tris Arg #3 Constrained ("TR3 CONST"). Figure 3. Fit parameters for isothermal titration calorimetry of TR3 CONST. Figure 4. Results of differential scanning calorimetry of TR3 CONST in the absence of heparin. Figure 5. Results of differential scanning calorimetry of TR3 CONST in the presence of heparin. Figure 6. Proposed 3-D molecular structure of the critical tether region of TR3 CONST. Figure 7. Results of activated partial thromboplastin time ex vivo bioassay of reversal of heparin activity. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION The present inventors have found that administration of synthetic helix heparin-binding peptides effectively binds and inactivates heparin, allowing for its removal from the system. In addition to systemic use, the heparin-binding peptide of the present invention is useful for topical application to counteract the actions of heparin locally, e.g., in bleeding wounds, vascular anastomoses, or leaking prosthetic vascular grafts. The heparin-binding peptide of the present invention may also be combined in a composition with other pharmaceutical agents. For example, the peptide of the present invention may be combined in a pharmaceutical composition with insulin, as a substitute for protamine, for use in treating diabetics. The heparin-binding peptide of the present invention may also be complexed with other therapeutic or with diagnostic agents, where the activity of heparin might interfere with the actions of the other agents. For example, the heparin-binding peptide of the present invention may be complexed with fibrin glue, or with diagnostic plasma tests which are sensitive to heparin. The heparin-binding peptides of the present invention is a branched peptides named TR3 CONST. Related straight chain heparin-binding peptides (Seg ID. No. 1-3) include: Branched-chain heparin-binding peptides related to those of the present invention include BIS-ARG HELIX # 2; Tris - ARG HELIX # 3; and Tetra - ARG HELIX # 3. The structures of these branched-chain peptides are displayed in Figure 1. The heparin-binding molecule according to the present invention is Tris ARG #3 Constrained (hereafter "TR3 CONST"). TR3 CONST possesses the same heparin binding activities as Tris-ARG HELIX #3 (which is displayed in Fig.1), but is simpler to synthesize in large scale, and hence is likely to be more amenable to commercialization. TR3 CONST is a "constrained" analog of Tris-ARG HELIX #3; it was designed with the use of molecular modeling and computational dynamics to place the three helix arms (which contain the heparin binding sites) into a constrained, or restricted, conformation. The sequence of TR3 CONST at the critical "tether" or backbone region is different from Tris-ARG HELIX #3, but the binding arms are identical (see Figure 14). Thus, the sequence of TR3 CONST is: Arg Helix #3: N(acetyl)-AEARARRAAARAARRA-C(O) DAPA = 2,3-diaminopropionic acid This compound behaves identically to Tris-ARG HELIX #3 in its ability to bind heparin with equal potency. The amino acids which make up the peptides of the present invention may be D-amino acids, L-amino acids, or mixtures thereof; preferably, the amino acids will be D-amino acids. Pharmaceutical salts of the heparin binding peptide suitable for administration by a variety of routes are known in the art and need not be described herein in detail. Examples of pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the peptide according to the invention, include base salts, e.g., derived from an appropriate base, such as alkali metal (e.g., lithium, sodium, potassium), alkaline earth metal (e.g., calcium, barium), magnesium, ammonium, and NW n H m bases and salts wherein each of n and m are 0 to 4 and n+m is 4, and wherein W is a (C 1 -C 18 )alkyl. Pharmaceutically acceptable salts of an acid group or an amino group include, but are not limited to, salts of organic carboxylic acids such as acetic, lactic, tartaric, malic, isothionic, lactobionic and succinic acids; organic sulfonic acids such as methanesulfonic, ethanesulfonic, benzenesulfonic and p -tolylsulfonic acids, and inorganic acids such as hydrochloric, sulfuric, phosphoric and sulfamic acids. Pharmaceutically-acceptable salts of a compound with a hydroxy group include, but are not limited to, the anion of the compound in combination with a suitable cation such as Na + , and NW n H m , wherein W is a (C 1 -C 18 )alkyl group, and n and m are 0 to 4, and n+m is 4. A still further part of this invention is a pharmaceutical composition of matter for binding to heparin and thus antagonizing its effects that comprises at least one of the heparin-binding peptides described above, mixtures thereof, and/or pharmaceutical salts thereof, and a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier therefor. Such compositions are prepared in accordance with accepted pharmaceutical procedures, for example, as described in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, seventeenth edition, ed. Alfonso R. Gennaro, Mack Publishing Company, Easton, PA (1985). For therapeutic use in a method of inhibiting heparin activity, a heparin-binding peptide, or its salt, can be conveniently administered in the form of a pharmaceutical composition containing a heparin-binding peptide, or its salt, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier therefor. Suitable carriers are well known in the art and vary with the desired form and mode of administration of the pharmaceutical composition. For example, they may include diluents or excipients such as fillers, binders, wetting agents, disintegrators, surface-active agents, lubricants, and the like. Typically, the carrier may be a solid, liquid, or vaporizable carrier, or combinations thereof. In one preferred embodiment, the composition is a therapeutic composition and the carrier is a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The heparin-binding peptide of the invention or its salt may be formulated together with the carrier into any desired unit dosage form. Typical unit dosage forms include tablets, pills, powders, solutions, suspensions, emulsions, granules, capsules, suppositories; injectable solutions and suspensions are particularly preferred. Each carrier must be "acceptable" in the sense of being compatible with the other ingredients in the formulation and not injurious to the patient. The carrier must be biologically acceptable and inert, i.e., it must permit the cell to conduct its metabolic reactions so that the compound of this invention may effect its inhibitory activity. Formulations include those suitable for oral, rectal, nasal, topical (including buccal and sublingual), vaginal and parenteral (including subcutaneous, intramuscular, intravenous, intradermal, and transdermal) administration, with intravenous formulations being preferred. For example, to prepare formulations suitable for injection, solutions and suspensions are sterilized and are preferably isotonic to blood. In making injectable preparations, carriers which are commonly used in this field can also be used, for example, water, ethyl alcohol, propylene glycol, ethoxylated isostearyl alcohol, polyoxylated isostearyl alcohol, polyoxyethylene sorbitol and sorbitate esters. In these instances, adequate amounts of isotonicity adjusters such as sodium chloride, glucose or glycerin can be added to make the preparations isotonic. The aqueous sterile injection solutions may further contain anti-oxidants, buffers, bacteriostats, and like additions acceptable for parenteral formulations. The formulations may conveniently be presented in unit dosage form and may be prepared by any method known in the art of pharmacy. Such methods include the step of bringing into association the active ingredient with the carrier which may encompass one or more accessory ingredients. In general, the formulations are prepared by uniformly and intimately bringing into association the active ingredient with liquid carriers or finely divided solid carriers or both, and then if necessary shaping the product. Various unit dose and multidose containers, e.g., sealed ampules and vials, may be used, as is well known in the art. In addition to the ingredients particularly mentioned above, the formulations of this invention may also include other agents conventional in the art for this type of pharmaceutical formulation. The heparin-binding peptide of the invention may be present in the composition in broad proportion to the carrier. For instance, the peptide may be present in the amount of 0.01 to 99.9 wt%, and more preferably in about 0.1 to 99 wt%. Still more preferably, the peptide may be present in an amount of about 1 to 70 wt % of the composition. Also part of this invention is the use of the peptide according to the invention for preparing a pharmaceutical composition for removing heparin from the circulation of a patient, by administering to that patient an effective amount of the heparin-binding peptide of the present invention sufficient to remove heparin from the patient's blood circulatory system, pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, or mixtures thereof. In this application, "patient" will encompass any mammal that has been dosed with heparin. The dosage of the heparin-binding peptide, pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, or mixtures thereof, in the compositions of the invention administered to a patient will vary depending on several factors, including, but not limited to, the age, weight, and species of the patient, the general health of the patient, the severity of the symptoms, whether the composition is being administered alone or in combination with other antiviral agents, the incidence of side effects and the like. In general, a dose suitable for application to a heparin-treated patient is about 0.001 to 100 mg/kg body weight/dose, preferably about 0.01 to 60 mg/kg body weight/dose, and still more preferably about 0.1 to 40 mg/kg body weight/dose. The desired dose may be administered as 1 to 6 or more subdoses administered at appropriate intervals as required. The compounds may be administered repeatedly, or it may be slowly and constantly infused to the patient. Higher and lower doses may also be administered. The dose may be adjusted taking into account, for example, the above-identified variety of parameters. Typically, the present compositions may be administered in an amount of about 0.001 to 100 mg/kg body weight/day. However, other amounts may also be administered. To achieve good plasma concentrations, the active compound may be administered, for instance, by intravenous injection of an approximate 0.1 to 1 % solution of the active ingredient, optionally in saline. The active ingredient may be administered for therapy by any suitable route, including topical, oral, rectal, nasal, vaginal and parenteral (including intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intravenous, intradermal, and transdermal) routes. It will be appreciated that the preferred route will vary with the condition and age of the patient, the nature of the disorder and the chosen active ingredient including other therapeutic agents. Preferred is the intravenous route. However, other routes may also be utilized depending on the conditions of the patient and how long-lasting the treatment is. While it is possible for the active ingredient to be administered alone, it is preferably present as a pharmaceutical formulation. The formulations of the present invention comprise at least one active ingredient, as defined above, together with one or more acceptable carriers thereof and optionally other therapeutic agents. The above method may be practiced by administration of the compound by themselves or in a combination with other active ingredients, including antiviral compounds and/or therapeutic agents in a pharmaceutical composition. Other therapeutic agents suitable for use herein are any compatible drugs that are effective by the same or other mechanisms for the intended purpose, or drugs that are complementary to those of the present agents. These include agents that are effective heparin binding agents. Examples are protamine, and Recombinant Platelet Factor 4, among others. The compounds utilized in combination therapy may be administered simultaneously, in either separate or combined formulations, or at different times than the present compounds, e.g., sequentially, such that a combined effect is achieved. The amounts and regime of administration will be adjusted by the practitioner, by preferably initially lowering their standard doses and then titrating the results obtained. The therapeutic method of the invention may be used in conjunction with other therapies as determined by the practitioner. Having now generally described this invention, the same will be better understood by reference to certain specific examples, which are included herein for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to be limiting of the invention or any embodiment thereof, unless so specified. Comparative EXAMPLE 1: Optimization of the structural features of heparin-binding peptides. At the outset of these experiments, four compounds were considered leading candidates as potential pharmaceutics. Two of these, K 121 -A 134 and K 121 -A 134 Ext, are based on the primary sequence of ATIII at the high affinity heparin binding site (20). It has since been shown that each cationic residue within these sequences is either essential for forming a productive electrostatic contact with the pentasaccharide unit structure, or is essential for allowing formation of a conformationally favored heparin/peptide complex (21). Both peptides are predominantly β-strand in character (although both acquire some helix character on binding heparin) and thus neither of these two sequences can be easily prepared without potentially losing significant binding energy. For these reasons, the present inventors have developed the unique family of helix heparin binding peptides of the present invention. The present approach in developing tight helix heparin-binding peptides is based on the proposed helix binding domains of platelet factor IV (47) or protein C inhibitor. A failure of previous strategies in developing heparin antagonists has been the belief that simply increasing net cationic charge without regard for conformational presentation of that charge would yield the most potent compounds. However, it is now known that there is a direct correlation between the number of basic residues and toxicity of protamine analogs (29) and that maximum interaction between heparin and proteins occurs when the two molecules show appropriate charge and conformations complementarity (cf., 16-22). Based on these studies, the present inventors designed and synthesized a peptide predicted to assume a helix structure in solution in which the cationic residues of the peptide were suitably spaced so that their positive side chains were oriented on the same side of the helix (16,22). The peptide, Succinyl (succ)-AEAAARAAARRAARRAAAR-NH 2 (Arg Helix #1 Seq. ID No. 4), was shown to be 75 % helix by circular dichroism (CD) spectrometry and complexation with heparin increased the helix content of the peptide to 100%. Heparin also increases the apparent thermal stability of the peptide by about 1 kcal/mol. In other words, heparin stabilized the conformation of the peptide. Two additional helix peptides were synthesized. In Lys helix #1 (succ-AEAAARAAAKKAAKKAAAK-NH 2 seq ID No. 5), all Arg residues except R 6 , required to make an ion per with E 2 for maintenance of the helix structure, replaced by Lys, and in Arg helix #2,(succ-AEARARRAAARAARRAARA-NH 2 ), the sequence of Arg Helix #1 was modified to maximize the number of Arg residues presented on one face of the helix. Isothermal titration calorimetry (17-21,47) was used to quantitate complex formation with heparin (Table 1) and factor Xa neutralization assays (20,21) were used to determine the ability of these helix peptides to bind anticoagulant heparin. Thermodynamics of Heparin Binding by the Helix Peptides Peptide K D (µM) ΔH (kcal/mol) ΔS (eu) ΔG (kcal/mol) Lys helix #1 29.2 - 99 - 97 - 6.29 Arg helix #1 22.9 - 74 - 243 - 6.44 Arg helix # 2 8.33 - 62 - 200 - 8.42 Bis-Arg helix #2 7.51 - 36 - 104 - 8.48 All experiments were done at 30°C in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.01. Generally, twenty 10 µl injections of 30 seconds duration were made into rapidly mixing (400 rpm) peptide solution, with 2 min equilibration time between injections. For all experiments, the indicated peptide was placed in the calorimeter cuvette at 0.10 mM and heparin was placed in the dropping syringe at an initial concentration of 0.5 mM. All isotherms were corrected by subtraction for heat of mixing and dilution following injection of heparin into buffer alone (in the absence of peptide). Based on the results of ITC, Lys Helix #1 and Arg Helix #2 were examined for their respective abilities to compete with ATIII for binding heparin. Arg Helix #2, possesses the higher affinity for heparin by ITC and also binds anticoagulant heparin better than Lys Helix #1. Binding is enthalpically driven and thermodynamically favored. Such large enthalpic changes almost always involve long range interactions, such as productive electrostatic contacts between the amino acid side chains and juxtaposed sulfate and/or carboxyl groups of the heparin saccharide. The present inventors also created a synthetic helix peptide that might more closely mimic the binding activity of protamine. In this scheme, two copies of Arg helix #2 were synthesized individually but simultaneously on the α- and ε-amino groups of a C-terminal Lys residue which had first been conjugated to the synthesis resin as the Boc-Lys(Boc) derivative. The resulting peptide, designated Bis-Arg Helix #2 Peptide, has two full-length helix sequences joined N→C ⇒ C→N through a lysyl residue. By CD, Bis-Arg Helix #2 is 45% helix in solution (25°C), but complexation with heparin increases the helix character to nearly 70 % and heparin binding imparts thermal stability to the peptide. The K D for heparin (7.51 µM), determined by titration calorimetry, is about 3-fold better than that determined for Arg helix #2 alone and in the factor Xa neutralization assay, Bis-Arg Helix #2 is displays an IC 50 of ≈ 70 uM, nearly 3-fold better than Arg Helix #2 and less than 2-fold poorer than protamine. Hence, Arg Helix #2 and Bis-Arg Helix #2 represent lead compounds which can be engineered to present a surface of high cationic charge density. The design of Bis-Arg Helix #2 appears correct in that increasing the number of potential binding sites increases the likelihood of effective factor Xa neutralization. The helix peptides possess greater potencies with fewer cationic residues that previously reported protamine analogs (31). Molecular modeling was used to conceptualize the complex that might form between Lys Helix #1 or Arg Helix #2 and the anticoagulant pentasaccharide unit structure of heparin (see ref. 21). The complexes were modeled in INSIGHT (Biosym) running on a Silicon Graphics Iris WD 35 workstation. Using the Biopolymer module, each of the peptides was initially constructed as an α-helix conformer, consistent with the results of CD. The atomic coordinates for the anticoagulant pentasaccharide unit structure which binds to ATIII were kindly provided to us by Dr. Dino Ferro, Istituto di Chimica delle Macromolecole del C.N.R., Milan, Italy. These coordinates were used to construct a Protein Data Bank (PDB) file for the pentasaccharide which was read directly into INSIGHT. Forcefield parameters for all molecules were assigned by the cff91 forcefield (Biosym). Forcefield parameters are not available which adequately represent the sulfate (hexavalent sulfur and three equivalent oxygens) or the sulfonamide functional groups of the pentasaccharide. Therefore, the present inventors chose to model these groups as deprotonated sulfites 1 wherein each oxygen atom was manually set to a partial charge of -0.339. Energy minimization was performed in DISCOVER (Biosym) using a combination of steepest descents and conjugate gradients methods. The peptides and the pentasaccharide were individually minimized at a constant dielectric of 80 and then complexes were formed manually between pairs of molecules. In each case, the peptide and pentasaccharide were oriented so as to create the best possible juxtaposition of oppositely charged groups while attempting to keep sulfate groups of the pentasaccharide that are not essential for binding to ATIII (see ref. 21) oriented away from the peptides. The complexes were then minimized at a constant dielectric of 3. A stereoview of the simulated "docked" complex formed between Lys Helix #1 and the pentasaccharide unit structure of heparin is shown in Figure 2 The peptide, oriented from A 1 at the bottom of the view up towards K 19 , is outlined in light blue, and all amino side-chain functional groups are highlighted in dark blue. R 6 is postulated to form a critical ion pair with E 2 which is necessary for maintenance of the helix structure (16). The pentasaccharide unit structure is oriented from the H unit at the bottom of the view up towards the D unit (nomenclature of Lindhal et al., ref. 48, and Atha et al., ref 49), and sulfate (yellow) or carboxyl (red) groups known to be essential for binding to ATIII are shown. The 2-N-sulfate group of unit D and the 6-O-sulfate group of unit F, which are not involved in binding interactions, are shown in gray. In the docked complex, many critical anionic groups are not juxtaposed to peptide amino acid side chains, regardless of the orientation (H→D or D→H) of the pentasaccharide relative to the peptide (the D→H orientation is not shown). Based on the modeled complexes, it may be concluded that Lys Helix #1 is a poor heparin binding peptide because many of the sulfate and carboxyl groups of the pentasaccharide do not make productive electrostatic contacts with juxtaposed amino groups of the lysyl side chains. Much of the potential binding energy appears to be wasted in making sure that the lysyl side chains are far enough apart to minimize coulombic repulsions. On the other hand, the complex formed between Arg Helix #2 and the pentasaccharide shows that virtually_all the arginyl side chains make critical contacts with the pentasaccharide and that the complex makes [an energetically stable] tight helix. Subsequent Peptide Development - Arg Helix #3 & 4 . Close inspection of the docked complex between Arg Helix #2 and the pentasaccharide reveals that R 18 and R 5 do not appear to be in spatial proximity to an oppositely charged functional group of the pentasaccharide. Also, R 5 does not apparently make a productive contact with the saccharide, but it may be postulated that R 5 is necessary for maintenance of the helix structure through an ion pair with E 2 . Hence, two derivative compounds were synthesized in which R 18 was omitted (Arg Helix #3; succ-AEARARRAAARAARRA-NH 2 ), or in which both R 5 and R 18 were omitted (Arg Helix #4; succ-AEAAARRAAARAARRA-NH 2 ). It was expected that Arg Helix #3 would retain its ability to bind heparin, but because Arg Helix #4 would lose some helix structure, it would not be as effective in binding heparin. The present inventors found that Arg Helix #3 bound heparin with about the same affinity as Arg Helix #2 or Bis-Arg Helix #2, as judged by ITC (Table 2), but that Arg Helix #4 bound heparin about 2-fold poorer. These results seemingly corroborate the predictions made from modeling. However, in the factor Xa neutralization assay, Arg Helix #3 was about 3-fold less effective (IC50 ≈ 200 µM) than Bis Arg Helix #2 (and about 2-fold less effective than Arg Helix #2) but Arg Helix #4 was more than 100-fold less effective (IC 50 ≈ > 1000 µM) than Bis-Arg Helix #2. Thermodynamics of Heparin Binding by the Helix Peptides a peptide K D (µM) ΔH (kcal/mol) ΔS (eu) ΔG (kcal/mol) Bis-Arg Helix #2 7.51 - 36 - 104 - 8.48 Arg Helix #2 8.33 - 62 - 200 - 8.42 Arg Helix #3 7.69 -41 -147 -7.10 Arg Helix #4 13.15 -48 - 150 -6.77 All experiments were done at 30°C in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.01. Generally, twenty 10 µl injections of 30 seconds duration were made into rapidly mixing (400 rpm) peptide solution, with 2 minutes equilibration time between injections. For all experiments, the indicated peptide was placed in the calorimeter cuvette at 0.10 mM and heparin was placed in the dropping syringe at an initial concentration of 0.5 mM. All isotherms were corrected by subtraction for heat of mixing and dilution following injection of heparin into buffer alone (in the absence of peptide). Clearly, the biological assay shows the selectivity of the heparin binding event, relevant to ITC, a global measure of heparin binding. Regardless, it can be concluded that much of the binding activity is retained on Arg Helix #3, but too much of the peptide structure has been ruined in Arg Helix #4, resulting in a much poorer binding peptide. Comparative EXAMPLE 2: Efficacy of the helix peptides in aPTT and factor Xa in vitro assays. The ability of the helix-based peptides to neutralize factor Xa enzyme activity has already been discussed. Protamine is the most potent compound tested, but Bis-Arg Helix #2 also effectively competes with ATIII for binding heparin. Perhaps an even more relevant measure of the ability of the peptides to reverse heparin induced anticoagulation is the ex vivo partial thromboplastin time (PTT) assay, done in pooled human plasma. Here, a fixed dose of heparin is added to individual samples of plasma to prolong the clotting time, and then protamine or test peptides are added to complex the anticoagulant heparin, thus reversing heparin induced anticoagulation. Of the helix peptides so far tested, only Bis-Arg Helix #2 was effective in reversing heparin anticoagulation. At about 80 µM, Bis-Arg Helix #2 reverses about 80% of heparin-induced anticoagulation, whereas Arg Helix #2 is relatively ineffective. Thus, Bis-Arg Helix #2 is also effective in this assay. These results further substantiate the hypothesis that increased heparin binding activity can be accomplished by increasing the number of potential complexation sites. Comparative EXAMPLE 3: Biophysical methods (circular dichroism spectrometry, isothermal titration calorimetry) and competitive binding assays establish the potency of novel antagonists. Bis-Arg Helix #2 was prepared in an effort to increase heparin binding ability relative to Arg Helix #2. The results support the hypothesis that multiple copies of the binding sequence enhance heparin binding and potency in the factor Xa and aPTT assays. However, as an in vivo agent, Bis-Arg Helix #2 is still less potent than protamine for reversing heparin induced anticoagulation. Thus, in attempting to enhance its in vivo efficacy without causing adverse activities, the biological potencies of peptides which incorporate 3,4,5,6 or 8 copies of Arg Helix #3 are determined. Methods . All peptide syntheses are done by automated solid-phase procedures using either tBOC or FMOC chemistries (and in particular instances, using both chemistries in an orthogonal synthesis scheme), essentially as detailed previously (16-21). All peptides are purified to N-terminal homogeneity by preparative reverse-phase HPLC in combination, where appropriate, with other chromatographies. The purity of each peptide is assessed by analytical reverse-phase HPLC, quantitative amino acid compositional analysis, automated N-terminal sequence analysis, and in some instances, by mass spectral analysis. Circular Dichroism spectrometry is routinely used (16-18,21) to characterize the redistribution of secondary structural elements which occurs upon complexation (or upon dissociation) of heparin with binding peptides. The procedures for using Isothermal Titration Calorimetry for quantitating binding events involving short-chain peptides and ligands has been developed in this lab (18,20,21,48) and has been successfully applied to quantitate the binding reaction between various peptides and heparin (18,20,21). From a single experiment, the association constant, and the enthalpic (ΔH,kcal/mol), and entropic (ΔS,eu) contributions to the Gibbs free energy of complex formation (ΔG,kcal/mol) are determined. N, the stoichiometry of ligand molecules (heparin) bound per equivalent of peptide are also determined, using a unit heparin polymer molecular weight of 15,000 (19). To measure the ability of the synthetic peptides to compete with native ATIII binding to unfractionated heparin, the present inventors developed (20) a Competitive Binding Assay based on the heparin assay of Teien et al. (51). This assay measures heparin-antithrombin complex formation by its neutralization of Factor X(Xa) enzyme activity. Briefly, heparin (28 nM), purified human AT III (280 nM) and test peptide (0-10 µM) are co-incubated at room temperature in the wells of a microliter plate for 15 minutes. Factor Xa and a chromogenic substrate for Factor Xa are then sequentially added, and the residual activity of Factor Xa is measured calorimetrically. Binding of the test peptide to the antithrombin domain of heparin diminishes the formation of heparin-antithrombin complex, and more residual Xa activity is consequently observed. The degree of inhibition caused by the peptide is calculated as the percent reduction of heparin-antithrombin complex activity in the absence of peptide (21,22). New Structures prepared: "Tree" structures of repeating units of Arg Helix #3 are prepared in which 3, 4, 5, or 8 copies of the peptide are incorporated onto a single C-terminal tether residue. Arg Helix #3 is chosen as the synthesis unit because it is shorter chain length than Arg Helix #2 (and thus easier to prepare) and retains 80 % of the binding activity of Arg Helix #2. The tree structures are built on a Lys-βAla-WANG synthesis resin core, in which the α- and ε-amino groups are also substituted with suitably protected Lys residues. "Arms" are thus created onto which multiple copies of the target peptide can be incorporated. Once synthesized, cleavage and purification are relatively straightforward; a single synthesis typically yields 400 mg of final product more than enough to perform all necessary biophysical and biological assays. Additional helix peptides with potentially higher affinity for heparin are created in which the sequence spacing and/or number of Arg residues presented on the cationic face of the helix are increased. That is, actually increasing the chain length of the helix to accommodate at least one more helix turn presents juxtaposed Arg residue(s) to the sulfate groups of the terminal pentasaccharide unit, at least one of which does not appear to make electrostatic contacts in the Arg Helix #2/saccharide docked structure. Thus, Arg Helix #5 (succinyl-AEARARRAAARAARRAAARRA-NH 2 Seq ID No. 7) is synthesized, which should put additional Arg residues in position to match these sulfate groups. Example 1: Heparin Binding Properties of TR3 CONST In this experiment, the heparin binding properties of TR3 CONST were demonstrated by isothermal titration calorimetry as described above ( see Comparative Examples 1 & 3, and Figure 3). To conduct this experiment, 15 µM TR3 CONST in 30 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, was placed in the calorimeter cell, and equilibrated at 30°C. Heparin was placed into a dropping syringe at an initial concentration of 100 µM. The following results were obtained: Thermodynamic parameters that mediate binding between heparin and TR3 CONST as determined by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Kd (nM) ΔH (kcal/mol) ΔS (eu) ΔG (kcal/mol) 1/N (pept equiv per heparin monomer Heparin + TR3 CONST 35.8 -35.4 -82.1 -10.3 2.3 As with Tris-ARG HELIX #3, binding of heparin by TR3 CONST is enthalpically driven and energetically favorable. The molecular behavior of TR3 CONST was examined by differential scanning calorimetry . Here, (Figure 4), we can see that the compound displays an endothermic thermogram, which likely encompasses two subdomains. The melting temperatures (Tm) of these two subdomains are 35.5 and 43.1°C, respectively. Upon complexation with heparin (Figure 5), the area under the curve (ΔH) is significantly diminished, and there is no evidence for the presence of the first domain structure (Tm 35.5°C). The second domain structure (Tm 43.1°C) is still present. We interpret this to mean that the binding of heparin has increased the thermal stability of the complex to the point where the binding domain (the helix arms) no longer undergo a thermal-induced denaturation, whereas this second domain structure (which could correspond to the "constraining tether region" is unaffected by heparin binding and still undergoes thermal-induced denaturation. Molecular modeling (Figure 6) reveals the proposed structure of critical tether region of TR3 CONST (Lys-Lys-Pro-DAPA-Glu-amide). By the inherent nature of the peptide backbone, the tether region "locked" into a constrained structure by formation of a productive "ion pair" between the ∈-amino group of Lys 1 (of the tether), and the γ-Carboxy group of Glu 4 (of the tether). The angstrom distances between the sites of incorporation of the helix arms of the peptide are shown. Additionally, an activated partial thromboplastin time assay was conducted using the methods discussed above ( see Comparative Example 2). The results of this ex vivo bioassay (see Fig. 7) clearly demonstrate that TR3 CONST is about three times more potent (IC 50 ≈ 0.5 µM) than Tris-ARG HELIX #3. Taken together, these in vitro and ex vivo data clearly indicate that TR3 CONST will function effectively in vivo . LITERATURE CITED 1. Casu, B. (1985) Adv . Carbohydr . Chem . 43: 51-134. 2. Clowes, A.W., et al. (1991) J. Vasc . Surg. 13: 885-893. 3. Sobel, M., et al., (1991) J . Clin Invest . 87: 1787-1793. 4. Edelman, E.R., et al. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 3773-3777. 5. Guyton, J.R., et al. (1980) Circ . Res . 46: 625-634. 6. Malimone, M.M., et al. (1990). J . Biol . Chem . 265: 18263-18269. 7. Evans, D.L., et al. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 12629-12642. 8. Olson, S.T., et al. (1992) J . Biol . Chem . 267, 12528-12538. 9. Choay, J. (1989) Sem . Throm . Hemostas . 15, 359-364. 10. Choay, J., et al. (1981) Ann. N . Y . Acad . Sci . 370, 644-649. 11. Ragazzi, M., et al. (1990) Carbohydr. Res. 195, 169-185. 12. Thunberg, L., et al. (1982) Carbohydr . Res . 100, 393-410. 13. Klagsbrun, M. et al. (1991) Cell 67, 229-231. 14. Prestrelski, S.J., et al. (1992) Arch . Biochem . Biophys . 293, 314-319. 15. Faller, B., et al. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 8285-8290. 16. Soler-Ferran, D., et al. (1992) Biochemistry 31: 5010-5016. 17. Sobel, M., et al. (1992) J . Biol . Chem . 267, 8857-8862. 18. Tyler-Cross, R., et al. (1993) Arch. Biochem. and Biophys. 306: 528-533. 19. Sobel, M. , et al. (1995) Circulation (in press). 20. Tyler-Cross, R., et al. (1994) Prot . Sci . 3: 620-627. 21. Tyler-Cross, R., et al. (submitted). 22. Margalit, H.J.., et al. (1993) J . Biol . Chem . 268: 19228-1923 1. 23. Fan, B., et al. (1994) Biochemistry 33: 14156-14161. 24. Najjam, S., et al. (1994) Biochim . Biophys . Acta 1225, 135-143. 25. McKay, D.J., et al. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 158: 361-266. 26. Jaques, L.B. (1973) Can. Med. Assoc. J. 108: 1291-1297. 27. Cundall, R.B., et al. (1979) J. Chem . Soc . Perkins Trans. II: 879. 28. Racanelli, A., et al. (1985) Semin. Thromb . Hemostasis 11: 176-189 29. DeLucia, A., et al. (1993) J. Vasc . Surg. 10: 49-58. 30. Horrow, J.C. (1985) Anesth. Analg. 64: 348-361. 31. Wakefield, T.W., et al. (1986) J. Vasc . Surg. 3:885-889. 32. Cook, J.J., et al. (1992) Circulation 85:1102-1109. 33. Weiler, J.M., et al. (1985) J. Allergy Clin. Immunol . 75: 297-303. 34. Wakefield, T.W., et al. (1984) J. Vasc . Surg . 1:346-355. 35. Wakefield, T.W., et al. (1990) Ann. Surg . 212: 387-395. 36. Telen, A.N. et al. (1977) Thromb . Res. 10, 399-410. 37. Lowenstein, E., et al. (1983) Anesthesiology 59:470-473. 38. Jorpes, E., et al. (1939) Lancet ii:975-976. 39. Fritze, L.M.S., et al. (1985) J. Cell Biol . 100: 1041-1049. 40. Clowes, A.W., et al. (1977) Nature (Lond.) 265: 625-626. 41. Edelman, E.R., et al. (1990) Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci. USA 87: 3773-3777. 42. Edelman, E.R., et al. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 91: 2308-2313. 43. Robinson Research Group (1995) Use of heparin neutralizing agents in cardiac bypass surgery. Marketing survey. Available on request from CBI through RBH. 44. Korutla, L.N., et al. (1994) Thromb . Haem. I: 609-614. 45. Kurrek, M.M., et al. (1995) Anesthesiology 82: 183-187. 46. Wakefield, T.W., et al. (1995) J. Vasc . Surgery 21: 839-850. 47. St. Charles,R., et al. (1989) J. Biol . Chem. 264: 2092-2099. 48. You, J.L., et al. (1993) Peptides 14:867-876. 49. Lindahl U., et al. (1983) J. Biol . Chem. 258,9826-9830. 50. Atha, D.H., et al. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 6723-6729. 51. Teien, A.N. et al. (1977) Thromb . Res. 10, 399-410. 52. Damodaran, A., et al. (1995) J. Prot . Chem. 14: 431-440. 53. Wakefield, T. W., et al. (1994) J. Surg. Res. 56, 586-593. 54. Warkentin, T. E., et al. (1995) N. Engl . J . Med . 332: 1330-1335. 55. Gremacher, A., et al. (1994) Thromb . Haemost. 71: 247-251. 56. Visentin, G. P., et al. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 93: 81-88.

Claims: A heparin-binding molecule being Tris-Arg Helix #3 Constrained, having the structure: The heparin binding molecule of claim 1, wherein the amino acids are all D-amino acids. A heparin-binding composition comprising a heparin-binding molecule according to claim 1, and a carrier therefor. A pharmaceutical composition comprising the heparin-binding composition of claim 3 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier therefor. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 4, further comprising insulin. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 4, wherein the composition is suitable for topical administration. Use of a heparin-binding composition of claim 3 for preparing a pharmaceutical composition for reducing plasma heparin content in a mammal in need of such treatment. Use of a heparin-binding composition according to claim 3 for preparing a pharmaceutical composition for reducing the anticoagulant effects of heparin in a mammal in need of such treatment.

Inventors: HARRIS ROBERT B, SOBEL MICHAEL, HARRIS, ROBERT B., SOBEL, MICHAEL
Applicants: COMMW BIOTECHNOLOGIES INC, COMMONWEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Application year: 1999
Main classification: C07K14
IPC codes: C07K14, C08B37, A61K38, C07K7, A61P43, A61P3