TREATING CANCER

Abstract: Provided is a method for measuring the resistance of cells to the cytotoxic effects of a chemotherapeutic agent, which method comprises testing a sample comprising cells or an extract therefrom for: a) the level of expression of p21, or for the abundance of p21 protein; and b) the level of expression of Cyclin D1, or for the abundance of Cyclin D1 protein. Also provided is a kit for measuring the resistance of cells to the cytotoxic effects of a chemotherapeutic agent, which kit comprises: I) a means for testing for the level of expression of p21, or for the abundance of p21 protein; and ii) a means for testing for the level of expression of Cyclin D1, or for the abundance of Cyclin D1 protein.

Description: TREATING CANCER The present application concerns methods of selecting the most appropriate therapy for patients suffering from cancer. The application is particularly concerned with measuring the resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents. Although radiotherapy and chemotherapy have been responsible for curing many people of cancer in the latter half of this century, there still remain a large number of tumours which either show little response to treatment, or respond initially only to recur later. In particular, women treated for ovarian cancer with platinating agents often show encouraging initial responses to chemotherapy (which often involves the use of cis- diamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) as the drug of first choice), but by 5 years after diagnosis, 2/3 of them have succumbed to their disease. Similarly lung cancer patients may respond favourably to combination chemotherapy regimens containing CDDP at the outset of treatment but very few experience long term survival. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the responsiveness of cancers to CDDP could help predict which patients are most likely to benefit from CDDP or whether alternative cytotoxic agents such as taxol or different therapies such as radiotherapy might be appropriate. Understanding treatment response mechanisms also holds the possibility of selectively modulating these mechanisms to improve the treatment of human cancer using CDDP. It has become increasingly apparent that certain oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes may not only be implicated in carcinogenesis, but can also influence the sensitivity of malignant cells to therapeutic agents. Attempts have therefore been made to use these and other genes to try and predict the therapeutic response of human cancer to the presently available treatment modalities such as radiotherapy and/or cytotoxic chemotherapy. Research up to the present time, however, has generally attempted to only examine the expression of single tumour related genes as methods of predicting therapeutic response. Research in the public domain has suggested that mutations in the p53 tumour suppressor gene, which can be found in around 50% of common cancers such as those of the breast, lung and ovary, are associated with resistance to treatment with cytotoxic drugs or radiation. Despite a considerable body of work, however, there are at present no successful clinical tests by which the detection of mutations in the p53 gene alone can be used to predict with an acceptable degree of certainty whether or not a patient's cancer is likely to respond to chemotherapy with, for example, platinating agents or the newer cytotoxic agents such as taxanes (e.g. taxol). The expression of single genes alone on the response of human cancer cell lines to treatment with cytotoxic drugs such as CDDP has been studied in human in vitro cell lines because these present a model system relevant to the response of human cancer in the clinic. In particular, they exhibit the range of sensitivities to cytotoxic drugs and ionising radiation usually encountered in the clinic. Discoveries in human in vitro cell lines, therefore, have a strong possibility of being able to be translated into clinically useful tests for how well cancers may be expected to respond to treatment. The progress of cells through the cell cycle is governed by holoenzymes formed by a combination of proteins called cyclins, whose levels fluctuate throughout the cell cycle, and cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) which become active when they join with cyclins. The cyclm/CDK complexes can be inhibited by proteins termed cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) which include the protein p21 WAF1/CIP1 (p21). The protein products of the Cyclin Dl and Bl genes and their respective cyclin- dependent kinase partners CDK4 and CDK1 have been studied. Cyclin Dl and CDK4 control the progress of cells through the cell cycle checkpoint between Gl and S-phase (the phase of DNA synthesis). Cyclin Bl and CDK1 control the cell cycle checkpoint just before mitosis. The expression of Cyclin Dl protein in a series of 16 human cancer cell lines has been shown to be related to their intrinsic resistance to the cytotoxic drug CDDP (Warenius et al., 1996). Cyclin Dl protein levels, however, showed no relationship with radiosensitivity, another treatment modality. The relationship between Cyclin Dl and CDDP resistance is not, however, strong enough on its own to provide the basis of clinically useful predictive assays. Thus, there are no indicators that measuring the mutational status or levels of expression of the protein products of single oncogenes, proto-oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes in human cancer cells would be able to provide the basis of a reliable clinical test for whether clinical tumours were likely to respond to treatment with chemotherapeutic agents, including platinating agents and CDDP. This invention provides methods of predicting whether human cancer cells are likely to respond to anticancer therapy agents (chemotherapeutic agents, such as platinating agents e.g. CDDP) by contemporaneously measuring the properties of two or more cancer-related genes. Moreover the co-relationship between certain independently expressed cancer genes identified in this invention also provides previously undescribed targets against which to potentially direct therapy that is more cancer specific. In particular, this application a method for measuring the resistance of cells to the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents, which method comprises testing a sample comprising cells or an extract therefrom for: (a) the level of expression of p21 , or for the abundance of p21 protein; and (b) the level of expression of Cyclin Dl, or for the abundance of Cyclin Dl protein. The order in which steps (a) and (b) is carried out is not particularly limited. Thus, step (a) may precede step (b), or alternatively step (b) may precede step (a). This application also provides a kit for measuring the resistance of cells to the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents, which kit comprises: (i) a means for testing for the level of expression of p21, or for the abundance of p21 protein; and (ii) a means for testing for the level of expression of Cyclin Dl, or for the abundance of Cyclin Dl protein. Thus, this application preferably deals with measuring the levels of Cyclin Dl protein, in cells whose p21 protein level has been determined (e.g. by Western blotting) to determine the resistance of a tumour to (for example) CDDP. High Cyclin Dl levels or high Cyclin Dl expression together with non-elevated (preferably substantially undetectable) p21 protein levels (or substantial non-elevation (preferably substantial lack) of p21 expression), is strongly associated with resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, e.g. CDDP in human cancer cells. The over-expression of Cyclin Dl, or the elevation of Cyclin Dl protein levels can be measured by any appropriate method, e.g. Western blotting. The point at which it is considered that the level is elevated or that the expression is over-expression is clear to the skilled person in this field, according to general teaching from the literature regarding usual levels of Cyclin Dl in human cell lines (see Oncogene, 1993, vol. 8, 2127-2133; and Oncogene, 1995, vol. 10, 775-778). This point can be determined according to the judgement of the individual carrying out the present method, depending on the particular cancer cells and patient involved. Similarly, the expression of p21, or the level of p21 protein can be measured by any appropriate method, including methods corresponding to those referred to above for measuring Cyclin Dl levels. Specifically, p21 is a cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor which can be detected by Western blotting, immunocytochemistry or newer developing techniques, such as determining the relative abundance of p21 mRNA. The point at which it is considered that the p21 is effectively not expressed (or the expression is not elevated) or the p21 protein is effectively not detectable (or is effectively not elevated) is clear to the skilled person in this field, according to general teaching from the literature regarding usual levels of p21 protein in human cell lines (see Oncogene, 1995, vol. 11, 2021-2028; and Oncogene, 1996, vol.l2(6), 1319-1324). The present invention will be described in further detail by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 shows the relationship between the level of Cyclin Dl protein and relative resistance to CDDP in cell lines in which p21 protein is substantially undetectable; and Figure 2 shows the corresponding relationship in cell lines in which p21 protein is elevated. Human cancer cell lines with a combination of non-elevated (preferably undetectable) p21 protein levels and high levels of expression of the Cyclin Dl protein are resistant to CDDP. This finding carries important clinical possibilities with regard to providing a potentially new parameter for predictive assays for CDDP responsiveness or a new target for modulating CDDP responsiveness. The high correlation of p21 protein levels with high Cyclin Dl levels or Cyclin Dl over- expression also provides a potential target for drug development. Efforts are being made to develop drugs against Cyclin Dl . Such drugs are likely to be more effective when used together to treat cancers with the above p21 protein levels and Cyclin Dl over-expression. Such drugs might also be used in combination with other agents such as CDDP as potentiators of its effectiveness. Figure 1 shows that in cell lines in which p21 protein levels are undetectable, there is a strong relationship between the level of Cyclin Dl protein and relative resistance to CDDP as measured by the DO.1 values. The implication is that human cancer cells with non-elevated or undetectable p21 protein levels and high levels of Cyclin Dl protein are unlikely to respond to CDDP and an alternative therapy such as radiotherapy or taxol should be considered. It is possible that taxol sensitivity is not influenced by a combination of p21 protein levels and Cyclin Dl protein over-expression. The Cyclin Dl/p21 test may also detect resistance to other cytotoxic drugs such as etoposide. Thus the test will indicate situations where radiation might be a viable alternative to CDDP, or whether other cytotoxic agents might be more appropriate. A clinical test may be developed for CDDP sensitivity based on the dual measurement of Cyclin Dl protein expression and p21 protein expression. Cyclin Dl protein is typically measured by Western blotting or immunocytochemistry in a research environment but for diagnostic purposes cheaper and more rapid methods are preferable. Because Cyclin Dl is a relatively short lived protein under cyclical transcriptional control, it is likely that mRNA levels for Cyclin Dl will follow the same pattern as the Cyclin Dl protein and show a similar strong relationship to CDDP resistance. This would make it possible to carry out a functional assay for resistance to CDDP by extracting mRNA from tumour samples and using this to determine the relative abundance of Cyclin Dl mRNA (and if desired the relative abundance of p21 mRNA). Oligonucleotide Arrays Determination of mRNA levels can be effected in a number of ways. One can readily convert poly-A bearing mRNA to cDNA using reverse transcription - a method is described in the example illustrating this invention. Reverse Transcriptase PCR (RTPCR) methods allow the quantity of single RNAs to be determined, but with a relatively low level of accuracy. Arrays of oligonucleotides are a relatively novel approach to nucleic acid analysis, allowing mutation analysis, sequencing by hybridisation and mRNA expression analysis. Methods of construction of such arrays have been developed, (see for example: A.C. Pease et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91, 5022 - 5026, 1994; U. Maskos and E.M. Southern, Nucleic Acids Research 21, 2269 - 2270, 1993; E.M. Southern et al, Nucleic Acids Research 22, 1368 - 1373, 1994) and further methods are envisaged. Arrays that measure expression levels of mRNAs and detect mutations in those RNAs are being developed and these offer an attractive embodiment of the diagnostic test proposed by this invention. Immunocytochemistry An alternative embodiment of this invention can measure Cyclin Dl protein levels and p21 protein levels by immunocytochemistry using confocal laser fluorescence microscopy. Preferably a scanning system is used such as those described in PCT/US91/09217, PCT/NL/00081 and PCT/US95/01886. Additionally, it is desirable that the microscopy system is also able to analyse multiple fluorescent dyes. In a preferred embodiment, an antibody against Cyclin Dl (sc-6281, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA) is labelled with a first dye, an antibody against p21 is labelled with a second dye, whilst a third DNA binding dye can be used to select for aneuploid cells. DNA binding dyes such as Hoechst 33258 dye, which binds AT-rich DNA or Chromomycin A 3 , which binds GC-rich DNA, are appropriate. A diagnostic test may comprise the steps of: • Extracting a biopsy of the tumour from a patient. • Optionally micro-dissecting that material to separate normal tissue from tumour material. • Preparing the biopsy material for microscopy which includes the steps of: ♦ Labelling the biopsy material with the above fluorescently labelled antibody probes against Cyclin Dl . The biopsy material may also, optionally be labelled with antibody probes against p21 and with a DNA binding dye. ♦ Separating the labelled cells from unbound labelled probes. • Placing the labelled biopsy material in a scanning confocal microscope to count cells that: ♦ Over-express or show elevated levels of Cyclin Dl, i.e. are labelled with at least a threshold quantity of antibody against Cyclin Dl. ♦ Optionally, do not express, or do not over-express or show elevated levels of p21, i.e. are labelled with below a threshold quantity of antibodies against p21. Alternatively, p21 expression might be determined by analysis of the mRNA or genomic DNA as discussed above. ♦ Optionally, have chromosomal amplifications as detected by the intensity of fluorescence from DNA binding fluorescent dyes. Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting A further embodiment of the diagnostic test can exploit Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). A FACS instrument separates cells in a suspension in a manner dependent on the cells being labelled with a fluorescent marker. A typical FACS device operates as follows. Cells in a suspension travelling in single file are passed through a vibrating nozzle which causes the formation of droplets containing a single cell or none at all. The droplets pass through a laser beam. Fluorescence excited from each individual cell in its droplet by the laser is measured. After the detector the stream of cells in suspension pass through an electrostatic collar which gives the droplets a surface charge. The cells carrying droplets are given a positive or negative charge. If the drop contains a cell that fluoresces with an intensity above a particular threshold, the drop gets a charge of one polarity. Unlabelled cells get a charge of the opposite polarity. The charged droplets are then deflected by an electric field and depending on their surface charge are directed into separate containers and are counted. Droplets that contain more than one cell scatter light more than individual cells which is readily detected and so these are left uncharged and enter a third disposal container. Multi-channel fluorescent detection devices have been constructed that can separate cells on the basis of labelling with multiple different fluorescent labels. These have multiple lasers which can excite fluorescence at different frequencies and the detector will detect different emission frequencies. A three label system is appropriate for this test. The same labelled probes as those described above for use in a confocal scanning fluorescence microscope would be appropriate. A diagnostic test might comprise the steps of: • Extracting a biopsy of the tumour from a patient. • Optionally micro-dissecting that material to separate normal tissue from tumour material. • Disrupting intracellular adhesion to form a single cell suspension. • Labelling the suspended cells with the above fluorescently labelled probes against Cyclin Dl . The biopsy material may also, optionally be labelled with antibody probes against p21 and with a DNA binding dye. • Separating the labelled cells from unbound labelled probes. • Passing the labelled cell suspension through a FACS device to count cells that: ♦ Over-express or show elevated levels of Cyclin Dl, i.e. are labelled with the anti- Cyclin Dl antibody above a threshold for 'normal' expression. ♦ Optionally, do not express, or do not over-express or show elevated levels of p21, i.e. are labelled with below a threshold quantity of antibody against p21. ♦ Optionally, have chromosomal amplifications as detected by the intensity of fluorescence from DNA binding fluorescent dyes. Modulation of Cyclin Dl Expression in Human Cancers At present many attempts are being made to develop drugs which inhibit Cyclin Dl. As this molecule has a vital function in controlling the progress of normal cells through the 'start' component of the Gl/S checkpoint such inhibitors would be likely to be extremely non-selective and very toxic to normal cells. The more specific relationship of resistance to CDDP and sensitivity to taxanes in human cancer cells having elevated Cyclin Dl levels and undetectable p21 levels described here provides a much more defined target for novel therapeutic agents which could potentially used in conjunction with taxanes, this being an agent with a proven track record of curing many (though by no means all) cancers. This approach is based on a concept of starting with therapeutic agents which already work to some extent and using techniques such as gene targeting to enhance the efficacy of already available therapeutic agents. In the case of patients who have undetectable, or non-elevated p21 levels, it may be possible to increase their responsiveness to platinating agents by decreasing their levels of Cyclin Dl . Cyclin Dl inhibitors are likely to be non-selectively toxic, but if administered at low doses in conjunction with an agent such as a taxane, the combination may be more effective against tumours than either alone, particularly to cells over-expressing Cyclin Dl. Example 1 Human in vitro cell lines of different histological origin which exhibit a range of intrinsic sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs as measured by clonogenic cell survival assays, have been shown to provide appropriate models of the response of clinical tumours to chemotherapy. In particular, these cell lines exhibit the range of sensitivities to cytotoxic drugs and ionising radiation usually encountered in the clinic. These human in vitro cancer cell lines are now widely recognised as relevant models for the clinical response of tumours to chemotherapy. Intrinsic sensitivity to cytotoxic agents is measured by clonogenic assays of a range of human cancer cell lines. It is therefore possible to identify genes whose expression and/or mutational status is related to intrinsic sensitivity to cytotoxic agents in a wide range of human in vitro cell lines by measuring the expression of target genes and/or determining their mutational status and correlating these parameters to cell line sensitivity to cytotoxic agents. This procedure has identified genes relevant to clinical responsiveness to CDDP. Discoveries in human in vitro cell lines, such as those leading to this invention, therefore, have a strong possibility of being able to be translated into clinically useful tests for how well cancers may be expected to respond to treatment. The body of work that has been carried out to measure the clonogenic cell survival of a wide range of human in vitro cell lines of different histology after exposure to CDDP is described below. Materials and Methods Cell lines and clonogenic cell survival assays The growth characteristics clonogenic assay procedures of the human in vitro cell lines used in this analysis have already been reported (Warenius et al 1994). The cell lines are listed, with their histological classification in Table 1. All are well established; many having been growing in vitro for several years. Cell lines were either donations or purchased by our laboratories. On receipt all were grown for 5 passages to provide sufficient cells for batch storage in liquid nitrogen. During this period contamination was excluded by at least one passage in antibiotic free medium and mycoplasma testing was carried out on all lines. For clonogenic assays, cells were taken from a designated primary liquid nitrogen batch and grown for 3-6 passages until there were sufficient well-growing cells. Further batches from these cells were frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cells were routinely maintained in DMEM medium except RT112 and H322, which were grown in RPMI1640 and MGHU-1 which were grown in Ham's F12 medium. All lines were supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated foetal calf serum (HIFCS). Table 1 In order to assay CDDP sensitivity 10 2 -10 5 cells were plated in 3 ml of Ham's F12 medium supplemented with 10% FCS in 6 well plates and incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO 2 for 8 hours. Dilutions of 0.02-2.0 μg/ml from a 1 mg/ml stock solution of CDDP (light protected) were then made and 1 ml of the appropriate dilution were added to each plate to give a final volume of 4 ml. The plates were then incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO 2 in darkness for 14 days in the presence of the CDDP. The medium was then removed, the cells were fixed in 70% ethanol and stained with 10% Giemsa and colonies of > 100 cells counted. One 6 well plate was used for each drug dilution. The data points from all the assays were pooled to provide means and SEMs. A minimum of 3 separate clonogenic assays with 6 points/drug dose/assay were necessary for each cell line. CDDP cell survival was determined at the 10% clonogenic cell survival level (D0.1) by interpolation of the fitted regression curve. Western Blotting for Cyclin Dl Two independent Western blottings with lysates for each cell line loaded in pairs on each gel were carried out. Standard conditions were used for the preparation of cells for lysates for Western blotting on each of the cell lines; 10 7 cells were grown in 162 cm 2 tissue culture flasks (Costar Ltd., High Wycombe, Bucks) until they were pre-confluent but still growing exponentially as confirmed by flow cytometry. Cells were then removed by trypsinisation, resuspended in complete medium + 10% FCS and washed 3 times by serial centrifugation and resuspension in PBS without serum. 1-3 x 10 8 viable cells were then pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended at 3x10 7 cells per ml of lysate buffer (Stock solution: 10% SDS 10ml, 0.5M Tris pH 6.8, glycerol 10 ml, Double distilled water 62 ml. To 10 ml. of stock solution were added 100 ml of 10 mM Leupeptin + 10 ml 100 mM PMSF). Protein estimations were performed and the final concentration of the lysates adjusted to 300 μg total cellular protein per 100 μl. To measure Cyclin Dl protein, 150 μg of total cellular protein in 50 μl of lysate buffer was added per lane well to a 7.5% Laemmli separating gel and electrophoresis carried out at 16°C using 60N over 16 hours and a constant current of 500mA. Blots were transferred to nitrocellulose at 22°C over 16 hours using to a semi-dry blotting apparatus (Biorad, Richmond, CA), incubated with the a mouse IgG| monoclonal antibody to mammalian cyclins (G124-259.5, Pharmingen) and then incubated with rabbit anti-mouse conjugated antibodies (Dako, UK) at 1/1000 and developed in alkaline phosphatase buffer containing Νitroblue Tetrazolium and 5-Bromo- 4-Chloro-3-Indoyl Phosphate, (Sigma, Poole, Dorset, UK) (50mg/ml in dimethylformamide) for 1 hr at room temperature in darkness. Colour development was arrested with double distilled water, and the blots were dried flat. Cyclins were clearly resolved as distinct bands, Cyclin Dl having the lowest mobility. Quantitation of the protein product of the Cyclin Dl gene was carried out by measurement of optical density on a Schimadzu scanning densitometer with tungsten light and expressed as O.D. units per 150 μg of total cellular protein. Titration curves obtained by loading different amounts of total cellular protein have previously shown that linear relationships for optical density (O.D.) could be obtained over the range found for Cyclin Dl protein across the cell lines (Warenius et al 1994, Browning 1997). In order to compare different Cyclin Dl protein levels between the cell lines, the mean O.D. value for all the lines was calculated and the relative O.D. for Cyclin Dl protein in each individual cell line was normalised to the mean O.D. and multiplied by an arbitrary value of 5.0. Western blotting was also employed to measure the p21 levels of the cell lines, according to substantially the same method as described above. The relationship between Cyclin Dl levels, p21 levels and CDDP sensitivity was examined for the cell lines. In cells in which p21 protein was undetectable a useful correlation was found between Cyclin Dl protein levels and resistance to CDDP. Thus, in cell lines in which p21 protein is undetectable, the higher the Cyclin Dl levels, the more likely it is that the cells are resistant to CDDP (Figure 1). This correlation is not found in cell lines in which p21 protein levels are elevated (Figure 2). References Barraclough et al, J. Cell Physiolog 131: 393 - 401, 1987. Chirgwin et al, Biochemistry 18: 5294 - 5299, 1979. Maskos and Southern, Nucleic Acids Research 21, 2269 - 2270, 1993. Pease et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91, 5022 - 5026, 1994. Sanger et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74: 5463 - 5467, 1977. Southern et al, Nucleic Acids Research 22, 1368 - 1373, 1994. Warenius et al., Int.J.Cancer. 67: 224 - 231, 1996. Bristow et al., Oncogene 9: 1527 - 1536, 1994. Bristow et al., Radiotherapy and Oncology 40: 197 - 223, 1996. P. W. G. Browning, "Proto-oncogene expression and intrinsic radiosensitivity, PhD Thesis, University of Liverpool, 1997. Deacon et al, Radiotherapy and Oncology 2, 317 - 323, 1984. Fan et al, Cancer Res. 54: 5824 -5830, 1994. Fertil & Malaise, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 7: 621 - 629, 1981. FitzGerald et al, Radiat. Res. 122: 44 - 52, 1990. Hollstein et al, Science 253: 49 - 53, 1991. Iliakis et al., Cancer Res. 50: 6575 - 6579, 1990. Kasid et al., Cancer Res. 49: 3396 - 3400, 1989. Kastan et al, Cancer Res. 51: 6304 - 6311, 1991. Kawashima et al., Int. J. Cancer 61: 76 - 79, 1995. Kelland et al, Radiat. Res. 116: 526 - 538, 1988 Lee and Bernstein, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 5742 - 5746, 1993. Mcllwrath et al., Cancer Res. 54: 3718 - 3722, 1994. McKenna et al., Cancer Res. 50: 97 - 102, 1990. McKenna et al., Radiat. Res. 125: 283 - 287, 1991 Nunez et al, Br. J. Cancer 71: 311 - 316, 1995 Pardo et al., Radiat. Res. 140: 180 - 185, 1994 Pirollo et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 55: 783 - 796, 1989 Pirollo et al, Radiat. Res. 135: 234 - 243, 1993. Powell & McMillan, Int. J. Rad. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 29: 1035 - 1040, 1994. Radford, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 66: 557 - 560, 1994. Sanger et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74: 5463 - 5467, 1977. Schwartz et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 59: 1314 - 1352, 1991. Shimm et al, Radiat. Res. 129: 149 - 156, 1992. Siles et al., Br. J. Cancer 73: 581 - 588, 1996. Su & Little, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 62: 461 - 468, 1992. Su & Little, Radiat. Res. 133: 73 - 79, 1993. Suzuki et al, Radiat. Res. 129: 157 - 162, 1992. Warenius et al., Eur. J. Cancer 30, 369 - 375, 1994. Warenius et al, Rad. Research 146,485 - 493, 1996. Whitaker et al, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 67: 7 - 18, 1995. Xia et al, Cancer Res. 55: 12 - 15, 1995. Zhen et al, Mut. Res. 346, 85 - 92, 1995.

Claims: CLAIMS: 1. A method for measuring the resistance of cells to the cytotoxic effects of a chemotherapeutic agent, which method comprises testing a sample comprising cells or an extract therefrom for: (a) the level of expression of p21, or for the abundance of p21 protein; and (b) the level of expression of Cyclin Dl, or for the abundance of Cyclin Dl protein. 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the sample is extracted from a subject. 3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the chemotherapeutic agent is a platinating agent. 4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the platinating agent is CDDP. 5. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the testing for the abundance of Cyclin Dl protein comprises measuring the abundance of Cyclin Dl mRNA. 6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the measurement of the abundance of Cyclin Dl mRNA comprises contacting the sample with a probe for Cyclin Dl mRNA. 7. A method according to any of claims 1-4, wherein the testing is carried out using Western blotting. 8. A method according to any of claims 1-4, wherein the testing comprises contacting the sample with a labelled antibody against Cyclin Dl protein. 9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the antibody against Cyclin Dl protein is 14841 C (from clone number G-124-259.5, Pharmingen USA). 10. A method according to claim 8 or claim 9, wherein at least one antibody is labelled with a fluorescent label. 11. A method according to any preceding claim, further comprising contacting the sample with a DNA binding dye for labelling aneuploid cells. 12. A method according to claim 11, wherein the DNA binding dye is Hoechst 33258, or Chromomycin A 3 dye. 13. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the sample is a sample of cells. 14. A method according to claim 13, wherein the testing is carried out by performing a cell count. 15. A method according to claim 14, wherein the cell count is performed using multi- parameter flow cytometry. 16. A method according to claim 14, wherein the cell count is performed using scanning confocal microscopy. 17. A method according to claim 14, wherein the cell count is performed using fluorescence activated cell sorting. 18. A method according to any of claims 14-17, wherein the sample of cells is micro- dissected prior to performing the cell count, to separate normal tissue from tumour tissue. 19. A method according to any of claims 14-18, wherein prior to performing the cell count, intracellular adhesion in the sample of cells is disrupted, to form a single cell suspension. 20. A method for selecting an agent for treating cancer, which method comprises testing a sample of cells or an extract therefrom, which sample is derived from cells not expressing p21 or in which p21 expression is not elevated, and/or cells in which p21 protein levels are substantially undetectable or are not elevated: (a) for the level of expression of Cyclin Dl , or for the abundance of Cyclin Dl protein; and (b) if Cyclin Dl is over-expressed, and/or Cyclin Dl protein is present at elevated levels, selecting for treatment an agent other than a platinating agent; (c) if Cyclin Dl is not over-expressed and/or Cyclin Dl protein is substantially not present at elevated levels, selecting for treatment a chemotherapeutic agent comprising a platinating agent. 21. A method according to claim 20, wherein the selection for treatment is carried out according to step (b) and the agent other than a platinating agent is ionising radiation, or is a taxane. 22. A method according to claim 20, wherein the selection for treatment is carried out according to step (c) and the agent comprising a platinating agent is an agent comprising CDDP. 23. A kit for measuring the resistance of cells to the cytotoxic effects of a chemotherapeutic agent, which kit comprises: (i) a means for testing for the level of expression of p21, or for the abundance of p21 protein; and (ii) a means for testing for the level of expression of Cyclin Dl, or for the abundance of Cyclin Dl protein. 24. A kit according to claim 23, wherein the means for testing for the abundance of Cyclin Dl protein comprises a probe for Cyclin Dl mRNA. 25. A kit according to claim 23, wherein the means for testing for the abundance of Cyclin Dl protein comprises a labelled antibody against Cyclin Dl protein. 26. A kit according to claim 25, wherein the antibody against Cyclin Dl protein is 14841 C (from clone number G-124-259.5, Pharmingen USA). 27. A kit accordmg to claim 25 or claim 26, wherein at least one antibody is labelled with a fluorescent label. 28. A kit according to any of claims 23-27, further comprising a DNA binding dye, for labelling aneuploid cells. 29. A kit according to claim 28, wherein the DNA binding dye is Hoechst 33258, or Chromomycin A 3 dye. 30. Use of a means for testing for the level of expression of p21, or for the abundance of p21 protein, for measuring the resistance of cells to the cytotoxic effects of a chemotherapeutic agent. 31. Use of a means for a means for testing for the level of expression of Cyclin D 1 , or for the abundance of Cyclin Dl protein, for measuring the resistance of cells to the cytotoxic effects of a chemotherapeutic agent.

Inventors: SEABRA LAURENCE ANTHONY, WARENIUS HILMAR MEEK, SEABRA, LAURENCE, ANTHONY, WARENIUS, HILMAR, MEEK
Applicants: SEABRA LAURENCE ANTHONY, THERYTE LIMITED, WARENIUS HILMAR MEEK, SEABRA, LAURENCE, ANTHONY, WARENIUS, HILMAR, MEEK
Application year: 1999
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: A61K31, A61K33, A61K45, A61P35, C07K14, C07K16, C12N15, C12P21, C12Q1, G01N33