TREATING CANCER

Abstract: Provided is a method for the diagnosis of a cancerous or pre-cancerous state in a subject, comprising testing a sample comprising cells or an extract therefrom for the co-elevation of CDK1 and CDK4. Also provided is a kit for the diagnosis of a cancerous or pre-cancerous state in a subject, comprising: (i) a means for testing for the elevation of CDK1; and (ii) a means for testing for the elevation of CDK4.

Description: TREATING CANCER The present application concerns methods of diagnosing cancer. In particular the application concerns a method for diagnosing cancer by measuring the levels of two proteins present in suspected cancer cells. The hallmark of cancer is a capacity for unlimited, autonomous cellular proliferation. The discovery of a means of selective inhibition of proliferation in cancer cells without concomitant damage to the proliferative capacity of normal cells, could potentially provide new ways to halt the growth of tumours irrespective of their degree of differentiation, invasion or metastasis. It is interesting to understand how cancer cells divide and whether this may differ from normal cell division. Most treatments for cancer are broadly cytotoxic, generally targeting proliferating cells. Normal tissues also proliferate, however, and so are also damaged by cytotoxic agents. Identification of cancer specific markers that permit targeting or that provide specific targets for drug development would allow the development of treatments that are more specifically toxic to tumour tissues thus reducing the debilitating effects of chemotherapy. The effect of the expression of single genes alone on the response of human cancer cell lines to treatment with cytotoxic drugs such as CDDP has been studied in human in vitro cell lines because these present a model system relevant to the response of human cancer in the clinic. In particular, they exhibit the range of sensitivities to cytotoxic drugs and ionising radiation usually encountered in the clinic. Discoveries in human in vitro cell lines, therefore, have a strong possibility of being able to be translated into clinically useful tests for how well cancers may be expected to respond to treatment. The progress of cells through the cell cycle is governed by holoenzymes formed by a combination of proteins called cyclins, whose levels fluctuate throughout the cell cycle, and cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) which become active when they join with cyclins. The cyclin/CDK complexes can be inhibited by proteins termed cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) which include the protein ρ21 WAF1/CIP1 (p21). The protein products of the cyclin Dl and Bl genes and their respective cyclin-dependent kinase partners CDK4 and CDKl have been studied. Cyclin Dl and CDK4 control the progress of cells through the cell cycle checkpoint between Gl and S-phase (the phase of DNA synthesis). Cyclin Bl and CDKl control the cell cycle checkpoint just before mitosis. The expression of cyclin Dl protein in a series of 16 human cancer cell lines has been shown to be related to their intrinsic resistance to the cytotoxic drug CDDP (Warenius et al., 1996). Cyclin Dl protein levels, however, showed no relationship with radiosensitivity, another treatment modality. The relationship between cyclin Dl and CDDP resistance is not, however, strong enough on its own to provide the basis of clinically useful predictive assays. The present invention aims to solve the problems associated with the above prior art and to provide an improved method for the diagnosis of cancer. Accordingly, this invention describes methods of diagnosing a cancerous state by contemporaneously measuring the properties of two or more cancer-related genes. This application deals with measuring the levels of the protein product of the CDKl gene and the protein product of the CDK4 gene, preferably whilst also determining the mutational status ofp53. Specifically this invention provides a method for the diagnosis of a cancerous or pre-cancerous state in a subject, comprising testing a sample comprising cells or an extract therefrom for the co-elevation of CDKl and CDK4. The co-elevation of CDKl and CDK4 can be either elevation in their expression or their protein levels. The elevation of expression of CDKl and CDK4, or the elevation of CDKl and CDK4 protein levels can be measured by any appropriate method, e.g. Western blotting. The point at which it is considered that the level is elevated or that the expression is elevated (or over-expression) is clear to the skilled person in this field, according to general teaching from the literature regarding usual levels of CDKl and CDK4 in human cell lines (see Cancer Research, 1994, Nov 15; 54(22), 5804-7; Cancer Research, 1993, Nov. 15; 53(22), 5535-41; and British Journal of Cancer, 1995, Jun.; 71(6), 1231-6). This point can be determined according to the judgement of the individual carrying out the present method, depending on the particular cells and patient involved. The invention also provides a kit for the diagnosis of a cancerous or pre-cancerous state in a subject, comprising: (i) a means for testing for the elevation of CDKl ; and (ii) a means for testing for the elevation of CDK4. Furthermore this invention provides a novel, complex, target for drug screening which might lead to drugs that are more specifically toxic to cancer tissues with the features disclosed in this invention. This invention specifically deals with measuring the levels of CDKl protein and levels of CDK4 protein, in cells. The p53 mutational status of the cells has preferably been identified, e.g. by DNA sequencing. High levels of CDKl and CDK4 are found in human cancer cells, especially those bearing p53 mutations. Modulation of the relationship between CDKl and CDK4 in p53 Mutant Human cells The above are unusual findings that do not fit with what is widely known about CDKs at the present time. Disruption of the CDK1/CDK4 relationship in p53 mutant cells can be identified as a new target for anticancer therapy. In addition because both the CDK1/CDK4 co-elevation and p53 mutation are confined to cancer cells and appear to be inter-related, they form in combination a complex target that is likely to prove the most specific one for cancer therapy that has so far been discovered. The invention will now be described in further detail by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 shows the correlation between CDKl and CDK4 levels in human cancer cell lines as well as the corresponding levels in normal cells such as human keratinocytes and human fibroblasts; Figure 2 shows the relative lack of correlation between cyclin D and cyclin B (the respective partners of CDK4 and CDKl) levels in human cancer cell lines; Figure 3 shows the range of values for CDKl levels found from several Western immunoblot runs carried out on specific human in vitro cell lines (the standard errors are also shown); Figure 4 shows the corresponding data to Figure 3, obtained in respect of CDK4; Figure 5 shows the correlation between CDKl and CDK4 levels in p53 mutant human cancer cell lines; and Figure 6 shows the corresponding correlation to Figure 5, obtained in respect of wild-type p53 human cell lines. A Dual Parameter Test for Cancer using CDKl and CDK4 Protein Expression A clinical test for cancer is provided based on the measurement of CDKl protein expression levels, CDK4 protein expression levels and detection of mutations in the p53 gene. In a research environment CDK protein levels are typically measured by Western blotting or by immunocytochemistry but for diagnostic purposes cheaper and more rapid methods are more preferable. The determination of the mutational status of p53 can be effected by sequencing the genomic locus bearing the gene from the patient or by sequencing the expressed mRNA after conversion to cDN A. Various nucleic acid sequencing methodologies are available at present, all of which are appropriate for use with this diagnostic assay. The most widely used method would be based on incorporation of terminating nucleotides into polymerase generated copies of a template, using the method of Sanger et al, 1977. Many alternatives have arisen recently including adaptor sequencing (PCT/US95/12678), ligation based sequencing (PCT/US96/05245), sequencing by hybridisation (A.D. Mirzabekov, TIBTech 12: 27-32, 1994) to list a few. Various methods for testing for specific mutations exist and are well known in the art, such as the TaqMan assay, oligonucleotide ligase assays, single strand conformational polymorphisms and assays based on hybridisation of template nucleic acids to oligonucleotide arrays. Because CDKl and CDK4 are not under direct transcriptional control, it is unlikely that mRNA levels for CDKl and CDK4 will follow the same pattern as their proteins. This means that determination of the mRNA levels of these genes is not sufficient for the purposes of this test. Immunocytochemistry In a preferred embodiment of this invention, CDKl and CDK4 protein levels could be measured by immunocytochemistry using confocal laser fluorescence microscopy to detect antibody binding. Preferably a scanning system would be used such as those described in PCT/US91/09217, PCT/NL/00081 and PCT US95/01886.. An antibody against CDKl (such as the Mouse monoclonal sc-54 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA) would be labelled with one dye, an antibody against CDK4 (such as the purified rabbit polyclonal sc-260 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA) would be labelled with a second dye whilst a third DNA binding dye could be used to select for aneuploid cells. DNA binding dyes such as Hoechst 33258 dye, which binds AT-rich DNA or Chromomycin A 3 , which binds GC-rich DNA, would be appropriate. The intensity of fluorescence from these dyes would provide an indication of the expression level of the genes. A diagnostic test may comprise the steps of: • Extracting a biopsy of the tumour from a patient. • Optionally micro-dissecting that material to separate normal tissue from tumour material. • Preparing the biopsy material for microscopy which includes the steps of: ♦ Labelling the biopsy material with the above fluorescently labelled antibody probes against CDKl and CDK4. The biopsy material may also optionally be labelled with antibody probes against p53 mutant proteins and with a DNA binding dye. ♦ Separating the labelled cells from unbound labelled probes. • Placing the labelled biopsy material in a scanning confocal microscope to count cells that: ♦ Over-express or show elevation of CDKl, i.e. are labelled with at least a threshold quantity of antibody against CDKl. ♦ Over-express or show elevation of CDK4, i.e. are labelled with at least the threshold quantity of antibody against CDK4. ♦ Optionally, express mutant forms of p53, i.e. are labelled with at least the threshold quantity of antibodies against p53 mutants. Alternatively, p53 mutational status might be determined by analysis of the mRNA or genomic DNA as discussed above. ♦ Optionally, have chromosomal amplifications as detected by the intensity of fluorescence from DNA binding fluorescent dyes. Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting One embodiment of the diagnostic test could exploit Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). A FACS instrument separates cells in a suspension in a manner dependant on the cells being labelled with a fluorescent marker. A typical FACS device operates as follows. Cells in a suspension travelling in single file are passed through a vibrating nozzle which causes the formation of .droplets containing a single cell or none at all. The droplets pass through a laser beam. Fluorescence from each individual cell in its droplet, excited by a laser, is measured. After the detector the stream of cells in suspension pass through an electrostatic collar which gives the droplets a surface charge. The cell carrying droplets are given a positive or negative charge. If the drop contains a cell that fluoresces with an intensity above a particular threshold, the drop gets a charge of one polarity. Unlabelled cells get a charge of the opposite polarity. The charged droplets are then deflected by an electric field and, depending on their surface charge, are directed into separate containers and are counted. Droplets that contain more than one cell scatter light more than individual cells. This is readily detected and so these are left uncharged and enter a third disposal container. Multi-channel fluorescent detection devices have been constructed that can separate cells on the basis of labelling with multiple different fluorescent labels. These have multiple lasers which can excite fluorescence at different frequencies and the detector will detect different emission frequencies. Using this technique a test could be carried out using a multi parameter array on a flow cytometer without the need for sorting. A three label system would l>e appropriate for this test. An antibody against CDKl would be labelled with one dye, an antibody against CDK4 would be labelled with a second dye whilst a third, DNA binding dye can be used to select for aneuploid cells. DNA binding dyes such as Hoechst 33258 dye, which binds AT-rich DNA, or Chromomycin A 3 , which binds GC-rich DNA, are appropriate. Additionally, a number of antibodies are commercially available which can detect some of the mutant forms of p53. Antibodies such as these may be labelled with a fourth dye. The intensity of fluorescence from these dyes gives an indication of the expression levels of the two proteins and indicates the chromosomal status of labelled cells passing the detector. A minimum level of fluorescence intensity from each dye present in an individual cell may be required to classify a cell as being cancerous. At present not all mutant forms of p53 can be detected using antibodies, although antibodies exist against a number of known mutant forms of the p53 protein. A diagnostic test may comprise the steps of: • Extracting a biopsy of the tumour from a patient. • Optionally micro-dissecting that material to separate normal tissue from tumour material. • Disrupting intracellular adhesion to form a single cell suspension. • Labelling the suspended cells with the above fluorescently labelled probes against CDKl and CDK4. The biopsy material may also, optionally be labelled with antibody probes against p53 mutant proteins and with a DNA binding dye. • Separating the labelled cells from unbound labelled probes. • Passing the labelled cell suspension through a FACS device to count cells that: ♦ Over-express or show elevation of CDKl, i.e. are labelled with at least a threshold quantity of antibody against CDKl. ♦ Over-express or show elevation of CDK4, i.e. are labelled with at least the threshold quantity of antibody against CDK4. ♦ Optionally, express mutant forms of p53, i.e. are labelled with at least the threshold quantity of antibodies against p53 mutants. Alternatively, p53 mutational status may be determined by analysis of the mRNA or genomic DNA as discussed above. ♦ Optionally, have chromosomal amplifications as detected by the intensity of fluorescence from DNA binding fluorescent dyes. Example 1 Human in vitro cell lines of different histological origin which exhibit a range of intrinsic sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs as measured by clonogenic cell survival assays, have been shown to provide appropriate models of clinical tumours, particularly in their responses to chemotherapy. In particular, these cell lines exhibit the range of sensitivities to cytotoxic drugs and ionising radiation usually encountered in the clinic. These human in vitro cancer cell lines are now widely recognised as relevant models for the clinical response of tumours to chemotherapy. It is therefore possible to identify genes from these cancer models whose expression and/or mutational status is tumour specific, which are also features of real clinical tumours. Discoveries in human in vitro cell lines, such as those leading to this invention, therefore, have a strong possibility of being able to be translated into meaningful targets for drug discovery programs. A body of work has been carried out analysing the expression of a number of genes that have been implicated in the cancer disease process. In contrast to any of the other genes controlling cell division that were examined, CDKl and CDK4 appeared to be consistently co-elevated in a large series of human cancer cell lines and extracts from clinical colon cancer. Without being limited by theory, it is hypothesised that for cancer cells to be able to continue to divide successfully it may be necessary a) for CDKl and CDK4 to retain their normal functions and b) for the elevated levels of these two proteins in human cancer to be related in some way, the mechanism of which is unclear. To investigate the above hypothesis DNA sequencing was carried out on all the exons of both CDKl and CDK4 in the 20 human cell lines in which a strong relationship between the expression of the two proteins was detected. There were no mutations in the exons of the CDKl and CDK4 genes in the 20 human in vitro cell lines that were sequenced. This finding is very surprising, because cancer cells are well known to progressively accumulate mutations in the critical genes controlling cell division and this is held by many scientific practitioners in this field to be most marked in human in vitro cell lines such as those investigated. Materials and Methods Cell lines and clonogenic cell survival assays The growth characteristics clonogenic assay procedures of the human in vitro cell lines used in this analysis have already been reported (Warenius et al 1994). The cell lines are listed, with their histological classification in Table 1. All are well established; many having been growing in vitro for several years. Cell lines were either donations or purchased by our laboratories. On receipt all were grown for 5 passages to provide sufficient cells for batch storage in liquid nitrogen. During this period contamination was excluded by at least one passage in antibiotic free medium and mycoplasma testing was carried out on all lines. For clonogenic assays, cells were taken from a designated primary liquid nitrogen batch and grown for 3-6 passages until there were sufficient well-growing cells. Further batches from these cells were frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cells were routinely maintained in DMEM medium except RT112 and H322, which were grown in RPMI1640 and MGHU-1 which were grown in Ham's F12 medium. All lines were supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated foetal calf serum (HIFCS). Table 1 - p53 mutational status I 5" O Identification of mutations in thep53 gene by PCR and DNA sequencing Material for PCR and DNA sequencing of p53 was obtained from the same liquid nitrogen batches used to provide cells for clonogenic cell survival data. Cells were grown for up to three passages prior to being subjected to the following procedures: Nucleic Acid Isolation RNA and genomic DNA were prepared from the cell lines described here by the guanidinium isothiocyanate CsCl gradient method (Chirgwin et al, 1979, Barraclough et al, 1987). Briefly, the cells were collected in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and homogenised in guanidinium isothiocyanate buffer (4M guanidinium isothiocyanate, 50mM Tris pH 7.5, 25mM EDTA pH 8.0, 0.5% (w/v) sodium lauryl sarcosine and 8% (v/v) 2- mercaptoethanol added just prior to use. The homogenate was cleared by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 mins at 4°C (SS34 rotor, Sorvall RC-5B centrifuge) and the RNA pelleted by centrifugation of the homogenate through a cushion of 5.7M caesium chloride/0. IM EDTA at 32,000 rpm for 20hr at 20°C (TST 41.14 rotor, Kontron Centrikon T20 60 ultracentrifuge). The pellet of RNA was redissolved in 0.1% (w/v) SDS and precipitated with ethanol overnight at -20°C before quantitation. Polymerase Chain Reaction, cDNA synthesis and nucleotide sequencing PCR (for exons 2-8 and for exons 9-11) was performed on DNA and RNA extracted from the human carcinoma cell lines. Each exon was then examined by DNA sequencing. PCR Primers were designed flanking each exon and synthesised on an Applied Biosystems 381 A DNA synthesiser. Each exon was amplified separately with the exceptions of exons 2 and 3 which were amplified as a unit, and exons 9, 10 and 11 which were amplified together by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR). The following primers were used: Exon 2/3 sense 5'-CCC ACT TTT CCT CTT GCA GC-3' Exon 2/3 antisense 5'-AGC CCA ACC CTT GTC CTT AC-3' Exon 4 sense 5 « -CTG CTC TTT TCA CCC ATC TA-3' Exon 4 antisense 5'-GCA TTG AAG TCT CAT GGA AG-3' Exon 5 sense 5'-TGT TCA CTT GTG CCC TGA CT-3' Exon 5 antisense 5'-CAG CCC TGT CGT CTC TCC AG-3' Exon 6 sense 5'-GCC TCT GAT TCC TCA CTG AT-3' Exon 6 antisense 5'-TTA ACC CCT CCT CCC AGA GA-3' Exon 7 sense 5'-ACT GGC CTC ATC TTG GGC CT-3' Exon 7 antisense 5'-TGT GCA GGG TGG CAA GTG GC-3' Exon 8 sense 5'-T ATC CTG AGT AGT GG-3' Exon 8 antisense 5'-T GCT TGC TTA CCT CG-3' Exon 9/10/11 sense 5'-AGA AAG GGG AGC CTC ACC AC-3' Exon 9/10/11 antisense 5'-CTG ACG CAC ACC TAT TGC AA-3' Genomic DNA was digested with EcoRl and precipitated with ethanol and resuspended in 50μl of water (Sigma) before being subjected to PCR amplification. The DNA (lμg) was amplified in 50μl PCR reactions containing 20 pmoles of each primer. A 'hot start' PCR protocol was used with the dNTP's and Taq enzyme initially separated from the rest of the reaction components on a wax cushion. The reactions were placed in a pre-heated PCR block at 95°C for 2 minutes before undergoing thirty cycles of denaturation (30s at 95°C), annealing (30s at 60°C for exons 2-3, 4 and 6; 65°C for exons 5 and 8; 67°C for exon 7; and 68°C for exon 9-11) and extension (1 min at 72°C). The PCR products were checked on a 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel before being purified using a Wizard minicolumn (Promega), and used directly in sequencing reactions. cDNA synthesis and RTPCR Complementary DNA was synthesised from approximately 5μg of total RNA using oligo (dT) as a primer. Total RNA (5μg), human placental ribonuclease inhibitor (HPRI) 20U and lμg oligo (dT) were heated at 70°C for 10 minutes, chilled on ice, added to lx first strand buffer (50mM Tris-HCl , pH 8.3, 75mM potassium chloride and 3mM magnesium chloride), 0.01M DTT, dNTPs (0.5mM for each deoxyribonucleoside tiiphosphate), 400U of Superscript Reverse Transcriptase (Gibco) and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. PCR for exons 9 to 11 was carried out using 5μl of the above incubation in a 50μl of PCR reaction as described in the previous section. Nucleotide Sequencing Sequencing primers (10 pmoles) were radioactively labelled at their 5' ends with 32 P-ATP (45μCi) at 37°C for 30 min in a reaction containing T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (PNK) (9.7U, Pharmacia) and lx T4 PNK buffer (lOmM Tris-acetate, lOmM magnesium acetate and 50mM potassium acetate). The primers used were identical to those employed in the PCR reactions except for exon 5 for which a separate sense sequencing primer was designed as follows: 5'-TAC TCC CCT GCC CTC-3'. Sequencing was carried out by the dideoxynucleotide enzymatic method (Sanger et al, 1977), using the fmol DNA Sequencing System (Promega). Any putative sequence mutations identified were confirmed by additional sequencing of the exon in the antisense direction as well as by carrying out a repeat PCR and sequencing of the cell line. Results Mutations were found in mRNA expressed from the p53 gene in a number of cell lines (see Table 1). The mutations identified in the cell lines described here were in exons 5-8 which are known to contain the majority of p53 mutations (Hollstein et al, 1991). All these mutations have been previously described apart from the nonsense mutation identified in codon 166 of the RPMI7951 line. This along with the G to T transversion in codon 298 of H417 did not lie within the most highly conserved region of the p53 gene. In the OAW42 ovarian carcinoma cell line the single base missense mutation from CGA to CGG was silent, so that the mutant triplet still coded for the same amino acid (Arg) as is present in wild-type p53 (wtp53) protein. A normal p53 protein was thus expressed in half of the cell lines. The mRNA of the other half of the cell lines coded for abnormal p53 protein. RPMI7951 and H417 possessed stop mutations resulting in 165 and 297 amino acid truncated proteins respectively. COLO320 and H322 independently exhibited a missense G:C to A:T mutation at the same site resulting in an amino-acid substitution from Arg to Tryp. RT112 and HT29/5 also had mutations coding for changes in Arg (to Gly and His respectively). COLO320, H322 and RT112 were homozygous for p53 mutations. The other mutant lines showed evidence of retention of heterozygosity. HT29/5 and RPMI7951 both expressed small amounts of wild-type p53 mRNA though H417 expressed relatively high levels. Western Blotting for CDKl and CDK4 Two independent Western blottings with lysates for each cell line loaded in pairs on each gel were carried out. 10 7 cells were grown in 162 cm 2 tissue culture flasks (Costar Ltd., High Wycombe, Bucks until they were pre-confluent but still growing exponentially. Cells were then removed by trypsinisation, resuspended in complete medium + 10% FCS and washed 3 times by serial centrifugation and resuspension in PBS without serum. l-3xl0 8 viable cells were then pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended at 3xl0 7 cells per ml of lysate buffer (Stock solution: 10% SDS 10ml., 0.5M Tris pH 6.8, glycerol 10 ml., Double distilled water 62 ml. To 10 ml. of stock solution were added 100 ml of 10 rtiM Leupeptin + 10 ml 100 mM PMSF). Protein estimations were performed and the final concentration of the lysates adjusted to 300 mg total cellular protein per 100 ml. To measure CDKl and CDK4 proteins, 150μg of total cellular protein in 50 μl of lysate buffer was added per lane well to a 7.5% Laemmli separating gel and electrophoresis carried out at 16°C using 60V over 16 hours and a constant current of 500mA. Blots were transferred to nitrocellulose at 22°C over 16 hours using to a semi-dry blotting apparatus (Biorad, Richmond, CA). To determine CDKl protein expression levels the blot was incubated with the sc-054 mouse monoclonal antibody to human CDKl (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA) and then incubated with rabbit anti-mouse conjugated antibodies (Dako UK) at 1/1000 and developed in alkaline phosphatase buffer containing Nitroblue Tetrazolium and 5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indoyl Phosphate, (Sigma, Poole, Dorset, UK) (50mg/ml in dimethylformamide). To determine CDK4 protein expression levels the blot was incubated with the sc-260 rabbit poly-clonal antibody to human CDK4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA) and then incubated with rabbit anti-mouse conjugated antibodies (Dako UK) at 1/1000 and developed in alkaline phosphatase buffer containing Nitroblue Tetrazolium and 5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indoyl Phosphate, (Sigma, Poole, Dorset, UK) (50mg/ml in dimethylformamide). Quantitation of the protein product of the CDKl and CDK4 genes was carried out by measurement of optical density on a Schimadzu scanning densitometer with tungsten light and expressed as O.D. units per 150 μg of total cellular protein. Titration curves obtained by loading different amounts of total cellular protein have previously shown that linear relationships for optical density (O.D.) could be obtained over the range found for CDKl and CDK4 protein across the cell lines. In order to compare different CDKl and CDK4 protein levels between the cell lines, the mean O.D. value for all the lines was calculated and the relative O.D. for CDKl and CDK4 protein in each individual cell line was normalised to the mean O.D. and multiplied by an arbitrary value of 5.0. The cell lines investigated are shown in Table 2 below. Table 2 The results are shown in Figures 3 and 4. A strong correlation between the expression of the CDKl and CDK4 in a series of human in vitro cancer cell lines is observed. Using DNA sequencing data for p53 mutational status for a number of these lines, it is further observed that the CDK1/CDK4 relationship is particularly marked in cell lines with p53 mutations (see Figure 5 and Figure 6) Also, surprisingly, the correlation seen between the protein expression for these cell lines was not seen for the relevant mRNAs. Nor was there a reciprocal correlation between the protein expression for one gene and the mRNA for the other. These results suggest that the co- elevation of CDKl and CDK4 proteins is not at the level of transcriptional control but may be at a transalational or post-transalational stage. That is to say the proteins themselves are influencing each other in some way or are both influenced by an as yet unknown factor. The findings concerning the co-relationships of CDKl and CDK4 proteins in human in vitro cell lines and clinical colon cancers are supported by transfection studies into RAMA37, a rat normal myoepithelial cell line. Pilot studies with RAMA37 suggest that over-expression of CDK4 protein as a result of successful transfection of CDK4 under unconditional promoter control is accompanied by a concomitant elevation in the constitutive expression of CDKl. References Barraclough et al, J. Cell Physiolog 131: 393 - 401, 1987. Chirgwm et al, Biochemistry 18: 5294 - 5299, 1979. Maskos and Southern, Nucleic Acids Research 21, 2269 - 2270, 1993. Pease et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91, 5022 - 5026, 1994. Sanger et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74: 5463 - 5467, 1977. Southern et al, Nucleic Acids Research 22, 1368 - 1373, 1994. Waremus et al., Int.J.Cancer. 67: 224 - 231, 1996. Bπstow et al., Oncogene 9: 1527 - 1536, 1994. Bπstow et al., Radiotherapy and Oncology 40: 197 - 223, 1996. P. W. G. Browning, "Proto-oncogene expression and intrinsic radiosensitivity, PhD Thesis, University of Liverpool, 1997. Deacon et al, Radiotherapy and Oncology 2, 317 - 323, 1984. Fan et al, Cancer Res. 54: 5824 -5830, 1994. Fertil & Malaise, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 7: 621 - 629, 1981. FitzGerald et al, Radiat. Res. 122: 44 - 52, 1990. Hollstem et al, Science 253: 49 - 53, 1991. Ihakis et al., Cancer Res. 50: 6575 - 6579, 1990. Kasid et al., Cancer Res. 49: 3396 - 3400, 1989. Kastan et al, Cancer Res. 51: 6304 - 6311, 1991. Kawashima et al., Int. J. Cancer 61: 76 - 79, 1995. Kelland et al, Radiat. Res. 116: 526 - 538, 1988 Lee and Bernstein, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 5742 - 5746, 1993. Mcllwrath et al., Cancer Res. 54: 3718 - 3722, 1994. McKenna et al., Cancer Res. 50: 97 - 102, 1990. McKenna et al., Radiat. Res. 125: 283 - 287, 1991 Nunez et al, Br. J. Cancer 71: 311 - 316, 1995 Pardo et al, Radiat. Res. 140: 180 - 185, 1994 Pirollo et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 55: 783 - 796, 1989 Pirollo et al., Radiat. Res. 135: 234 - 243, 1993. Powell & McMillan, Int. J. Rad. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 29: 1035 - 1040, 1994. Radford, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 66: 557 - 560, 1994. Sanger et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74: 5463 - 5467, 1977. Schwartz et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 59: 1314 - 1352, 1991. Shirnm et al, Radiat. Res. 129: 149 - 156, 1992. Siles et al, Br. J. Cancer 73: 581 - 588, 1996. Su & Little, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 62: 461 - 468, 1992. Su & Little, Radiat. Res. 133: 73 - 79, 1993. Suzuki et al, Radiat. Res. 129: 157 - 162, 1992. Warenius et al, Eur. J. Cancer 30, 369 - 375, 1994. Warenius et al, Rad. Research 146,485 - 493, 1996. Whitaker et al, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 67: 7 - 18, 1995. Xia et al, Cancer Res. 55: 12 - 15, 1995. Zhen et al, Mut. Res. 346, 85 - 92, 1995.

Claims: CLAIMS: 1. A method for the diagnosis of a cancerous or pre-cancerous state in a subject, comprising testing a sample comprising cells or an extract therefrom for the co-elevation of CDKl and CDK4. 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the sample is extracted from the subject. 3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the testing comprises contacting the sample with a labelled antibody against CDKl and/or a labelled antibody against CDK4. 4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the antibody against CDKl is sc-54 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., CA) and/or the antibody against CDK4 is sc-260 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., CA) 5. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the cells are mutant p53 cells. 6. A method according to claim 5, wherein mutant p53 cells are identified by contacting the sample with a labelled antibody against mutant p53. 7. A method according to any of claims 3-6, wherein at least one antibody is labelled with a fluorescent label. 8. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the testing is carried out using Western blotting. 9. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the sample is a sample of cells. 10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the testing is carried out by performing a cell count. 11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the cell count is performed using multi- parameter flow cytometry. 12. A method according to claim 10, wherein the cell count is performed using scanning confocal microscopy. 13. A method according to claim 10, wherein the cell count is performed using fluorescence activated cell sorting. 14. A method according to any of claims 10-13, wherein the sample of cells is micro- dissected prior to performing the cell count, to separate normal tissue from tumour tissue. 15. A method according to claim 14, wherein normal tissue is separated from tumour tissue by contacting the sample of cells with a DNA binding dye to label aneuploid cells, and separating labelled cells from non-labelled cells. 16. A method according to claim 15, wherein the DNA binding dye is Hoechst 33258 or Chromomycin A 3 dye. 17. A method according to any of claims 10-16, wherein prior to performing the cell count, intracellular adhesion in the sample of cells is disrupted, to form a single cell suspension. 18. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the CDKl and CDK4 are wild- type CDKl and CDK4. 19. A kit for the diagnosis of a cancerous or pre-cancerous state in a subject, comprising: (i) a means for testing for the elevation of CDKl ; and (ii) a means for testing for the elevation of CDK4. 20. A kit according to claim 19, wherein the means for testing for the elevation of CDKl comprises a labelled antibody against CDKl and the means for testing for the elevation of CDK4 comprises a labelled antibody against CDK4. 21. A kit according to claim 20, wherein the antibody against CDKl is sc-54 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., CA) and the antibody against CDK4 is sc-260 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., CA). 22. A kit according to any of claims 19-21, further comprising a means for identifying mutant p53 cells. 23. A kit according to claim 22, wherein the means for identifying mutant p53 cells comprises a labelled antibody against mutant p53. 24. A kit according to any of claims 20-23, wherein at least one antibody is labelled with a fluorescent label. 25. A kit according to any of claims 19-24, further comprising a DNA binding dye, for labelling aneuploid cells. 26. A kit according to claim 25, wherein the DNA binding dye is Hoechst 33258 or Chromomycin A 3 dye. 27. A kit according to any of claims 19-26, wherein the CDKl and CDK4 are wild-type CDKl and CDK4. 28. Use of a means for testing for the elevation of CDKl , for diagnosing cancer. 29. Use of a means for testing for the elevation of CDK4, for diagnosing cancer.

Inventors: SEABRA LAURENCE ANTHONY, WARENIUS HILMAR MEEK, SEABRA, LAURENCE, ANTHONY, WARENIUS, HILMAR, MEEK
Applicants: SEABRA LAURENCE ANTHONY, THERYTE LIMITED, WARENIUS HILMAR MEEK, SEABRA, LAURENCE, ANTHONY, WARENIUS, HILMAR, MEEK
Application year: 1999
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: A61K31, A61K33, A61K45, A61P35, C07K14, C07K16, C12N15, C12P21, C12Q1, G01N33