PROCESS FOR MAKING ANIONIC POLYMERIC DI- AND POLYFUNCTIONAL POLYMERS USING PROTECTED FUNCTIONAL INITIATORS

Abstract: This invention relates to a process for making anionic di- and polyfunctional polymers using protected functional initiators, comprising the steps of: a) initiating polymerisation of one or more anionically polymerisable monomers with an initiator having the structure (1) wherein R<1>, R<2>, and R<3> are independently selected from saturated and unsaturated aliphatic and aromatic radicals, A is a hydrocarbon bridging group containing from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, and B is an alkali metal; and b) polymerising one or more anionically polymerisable monomers in the presence of a polymerisation termination inhibitor which is a metal alkyl. In another embodiment of the invention, there are provided di- and polyfunctional polymers produced when anionically polymerisable monomers are polymerised by such a process.

Description: PROCESS FOR MAKING ANIONIC POLYMERIC DI- AND POLYFUNCTIONAL POLYMERS USING PROTECTED FUNCTIONAL INITIATORS Field of the Invention This invention relates to a process for making anionic polymeric di- and polyfunctional polymers using a protected functional initiator. Background of the Invention Anionic polymerisation of unsaturated monomers with lithium initiators, such as sec-butyllithium, and hydrogenation of residual unsaturation has been described in many references. Great Britain published patent application 2,241,239 and related United States Patent Nos. 5,331,058 and 5,362,699 describe a composition for an anionic protected functional initiator (PFI) having the structure wherein R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are independently selected from saturated and unsaturated aliphatic and aromatic radicals, A is a hydrocarbon bridging group containing from 1 to 25 carbon atoms and B is an alkali metal, such as lithium. These documents disclose that a problem with undesirable termination reactions can occur when using the PFI, particularly if the radicals, R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are all methyl or if together they contain less than 4 carbon atoms . United States Patent No. 5,416,168 describes a polymerisation process using lithium compounds having the structure: wherein A" is cyclohexyl or -CR'R"-, wherein R 1 is a linear alkyl having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, and R" is hydrogen or a linear alkyl having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms. This PFI also initiates polymerisation of anionic polymers at much higher polymerisation temperatures than previously known for PFIs and is cost effective to produce. Unfortunately, even for the cost effective PFI of x 168, it has been found that in commercial applications where polymerisation cycle times of two hours or longer are possible, these initiators undergo undesirable termination reactions. The results of these undesirable termination reactions are varied and include (a) limiting the amount of polymer that can be produced from a given amount of initiator, (b) broadening the molecular weight distribution of the polymer, (c) limiting the ability to make well defined block copolymers, and/or (d) limiting the ability for postpolymerisation chemistry, such as adding another functional site to the living end of the polymer chain. Therefore it would be highly desirable to develop a process which inhibits undesirable side reactions, resulting in a higher functionality in the polymer product . Summary of the Invention The present invention provides an improved process for making anionic di- and polyfunctional polymers using protected functional initiators, comprising the steps of: a) initiating polymerisation of one or more anionically polymerisable monomers with an initiator having the structure: wherein R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are independently selected from saturated and unsaturated aliphatic and aromatic radicals, A is a hydrocarbon bridging group containing from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, and B is an alkali metal; and b) polymerising one or more anionically polymerisable monomers in the presence of a polymerisation termination inhibitor which is a metal alkyl. In another embodiment of the invention, there are provided di- and polyfunctional polymers produced when anionically polymerisable monomers are polymerised by such a process. Detailed Description of the Invention This invention relates to functionalised polymers and processes for inhibiting polymerisation terminating side reactions that can occur when protected functional initiators are used. Polymers which can be made according to the present invention are those made from any anionically polymerisable monomer, especially conjugated dienes and terminal functionalised polydiene polymers, including random and block copolymers with styrene. Styrene copolymers hereunder can be made in the same manner as the polydiene polymers and can be random or block copolymers with dienes. In general the present invention will work to reduce or eliminate side reactions when anionically polymerising conjugated dienes or other anionically polymerisable monomers using any protected functional initiator having a reactive silicon center. The invention can be suitably applied to PFIs that have been previously described in the art and discussed below, in order to eliminate or reduce the side reactions that are inherent to their use. The present invention can be generally applied to PFIs as described in Great Britain patent application 2,241,239 and United States Patent Nos. 5,331,058 and 5,362,699, having the structure: wherein R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are independently selected from saturated and unsaturated aliphatic and aromatic radicals, A is a hydrocarbon bridging group containing from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, and B is an alkali metal, preferably lithium. The present invention can be preferably applied to PFIs as described in United States Patent No. 5,321,148, where R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are independently selected from alkyl groups containing 1 to 10 carbon atoms and aryl groups containing 6 to 10 carbon atoms, A is selected from alkyl groups containing 2 to 8 carbon atoms either straight chain or substituted by alkyl or aryl groups and B is lithium. In a preferred embodiment, the present invention is suited to PFIs as described in United States Patent No. 5,416,168 wherein R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are each methyl; the hydrocarbon bridging group has the structure CH 2 -A"-CH 2 , wherein A" is cyclohexyl or CR'R"-, R' is a linear alkyl having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms and R" is hydrogen or a linear alkyl having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms; and B is lithium, according to structure (2) . The initiator of structure (2) has been used to prepare polymers of butadiene which have a uniform distribution of 1, 2-addition when the amount of 1,2- addition is between 5 and 95%w, more preferably between 30 to 70%w. The alkali metal initiator process is well known. The present invention can be suitably applied to processes for lithium initiators of the nature described in US Patent Nos. 4,039,593 and Re. 27,145. Typical living polymer structures that can be made with alkali metal initiators: X-B-M X-B/A-M X-A-B-M X-B-A-M X-B-B/A-M X-B/A-B-M X-A-B-A-M wherein B represents polymerised units of one or more anionically polymerisable monomers, especially conjugated diene hydrocarbons, A represents polymerised units of one or more vinyl aromatic compounds, B/A represents random polymerised units of the conjugated diene hydrocarbons and the vinyl aromatic monomers, M is an alkali metal, and X is the residue of the initiator. The living polymers are terminated as linear polymers, coupled to form branched polymers, or capped to form additional functional groups by conventional means such as addition of methanol, silicon tetrachloride, divinylbenzene, or ethylene oxide. Unfortunately, the PFI initiators undergo undesirable termination, or "side" reactions. Great Britain patent application 2,241,239 warned of reactivity of the siloxy group and suggested that the radicals R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 not all be methyl, and preferably that one be aryl, and that the total carbon atoms in the radicals be at least 4, preferably 5. It has now been discovered that the adverse side reactions involve a reaction of the living, C-M, end of the anionic polymer chain with the protected, R x R 2 R 3 SiOC, end. This side reaction, which appears to occur a little over 10% of the time, results in the transfer of the alkali metal moiety from the growing end of the polymer chain to the inactive, protected functional group end of the molecule. For example, when a PFI of Structure (2) is used, in some of the molecules the desired structure of the living polymerisation product CH 3 I . CH 3 — Si — O — CH 2 — A" — CH2 ,ΛΛAΛAΛAΛΛΛftΛΛΛΛΛΛΛ ΛΛ Li Living Polymer J-T T Polybutadiene is converted to an undesired structure CH 3 I . Li — o — CH 2 — A" — CH 2 ,ΛΛΛΛΛ ΛΛΛΛΛΛ ΛΛΛΛΛΛnΛΛΛv 'Si — CH 3 Silicon Capped Polybutadiene ' τ Terminated Polymer Crl 3 or CH 3 CH 3 i . I . " CH — Si — O — CH 2 — A" — CH2 ΛΛΛ ΛΛΛΛΛΛΛΛΛ ΛΛΛΛΛΛ ΛΛ ~ , Si — CH 3 CH 3 CH 3 In the undesired structures, the living polymer C-Li end's reactivity is terminated, making the molecule inert to (a) further polymerisation and (b) postpolymerisation reactions, such as capping with ethylene oxide. Loss of activity in further polymerisation affects the cost effectiveness of the initiator, limits the initiator's effectiveness in making block copolymers, and tends to broaden the molecular weight distribution of the product. Loss of postpolymerisation reaction capability means that desired reactions, such as reacting the polymer chain with ethylene oxide to make a difunctional telechelic polymer or reacting with a coupling agent to make a linked polymer having functional groups on the ends of the molecules, become limited. Thus the polymer mixture becomes one containing monofunctional impurity, a structural phenomenon of great commercial disadvantage compared to difunctional polymers. The process of the present invention employs termination inhibitors that inhibit the alkali metal- silicon attack. This inhibition of termination seems to occur as a result of the living polymer chain end reacting reversibly with the metal alkyl inhibitor to form an "ate complex." An illustrative example of this concept is shown below for the case where triethylaluminium is the metal alkyl inhibitor and butadiene is the anionically polymerisable monomer. The "ate complex" appears to be less reactive with the Si-0 bond on the protected end of the polymer chain. This may, at least in part, be due to the increased steric bulk of the "ate complex." OCH 2 A"CH 2 PolyBd - + F. _ A 1 „ *- . OCH 2 A"CH 2 PolyBd . 0 (CH 3 ) 3 Sr Li (CH 3 ) 3 Sr A_Et 3 Θ Li "Ate Complex" The C-Li center on an uninhibited, living chain end is smaller and therefore more prone to the undesired side reaction with the Si-0 bond of a protected polymer chain end than is the large, bulky end of an "ate complex." It is likely the case that the maximum level of inhibition is achieved when the inhibitor is present in a concentration equal to that of living polymer chain ends (Metal Alkyl/C-Li Center=l (mol/mol) ) . For the purpose of controlling other aspects of the polymerisation reaction, such as the polymerisation rate, it may be desirable to use less of the inhibitor. It is unlikely that levels below one inhibitor per 10 C- Li chain ends (Metal Alkyl/C-Li Center>0.1) give a measurable level of inhibition of the side reaction with the Si-0 centers . Levels of inhibitor that are in molar excess of the living polymer chain ends, C-Li centers, are expected to be effective inhibitors of the undesired side reaction but will not be markedly better than a molar ratio of 1 : 1. As excess levels of inhibitor are not expected to improve performance, they will add unnecessarily to the cost of the process. For this reason, lower levels of the inhibitor reagent are preferred. The inhibitor is used in molar ratios relative to the living polymer chain ends of from 0.1 to 10, more preferably from 0.1 to 1, most preferably from 0.5 to 1. The inhibitor selected should be a metal alkyl. Preferably, the metal alkyl is selected from the group consisting of trialkyl boron, trialkyl aluminium, dialkyl magnesium, and dialkyl zinc compounds. The or each alkyl group may independently have 1 to 10 carbon atoms, preferably 2 to 8 carbon atoms. Preferred trialkylaluminium compounds are triethylaluminium, trimethylaluminium, tri-n-propylaluminium, tri-n- butylaluminium, triisobutylaluminium, tri-n- hexylaluminium, and trioctylaluminium because these reagents are readily available in commercial quantities. Triethylaluminium is most preferred as it is least expensive on a molar basis. Preferred dialkylmagnesium compounds are butylethylmagnesium, di-n-butylmagnesium, and di-n-hexylmagnesium because these reagents are readily available in commercial quantitites . Preferred dialkylzinc compounds are dimethylzinc, diethylzinc, di- n-propylzinc, diisobutylzinc, and di-n-butylzinc because these reagents are readily available in commercial quantities. A polymerisation process using these termination inhibitors undergoes less of the undesired termination reactions than analogous polymerisation processes that do not use the polymerisation termination inhibitors. The polymerisation process is thus more efficient because a greater number of polymerisation sites remain active throughout the polymerisation. The polymer produced also has a narrower molecular weight distribution and a higher degree of di- or poly- functionality from the improved reactivity in end capping or coupling reactions. Great Britain patent application 2,241,239 suggested that, in order to reduce reactivity of the siloxy group, polymerisation temperature be controlled between -30°C and +30°C. Unfortunately, for commercial applications such polymerisation temperatures are cost prohibitive, as the reagents must be cooled for such an exothermic reaction. Also, the polymerisation time at the lower temperatures is much longer than is commercially feasible. PFIs are very active at room temperature and it has been found that polymerisation is preferably initiated at a temperature from 15°C to 60°C, most preferably from 30°C to 40°C. It is generally advisable to keep the polymerisation temperature below 100°C or side reactions that change microstructure and limit capping efficiency may become important. Polymerisations can be carried out over a range of solids levels, preferably from 5 %w to 80 %w polymer, most preferably from 10 %w to 40 %w. When the conjugated diene is 1, 3-butadiene and when the conjugated diene polymer will be hydrogenated, the anionic polymerisation of the conjugated diene hydrocarbons is typically controlled with high concentrations of structure modifiers such as diethyl ether to obtain the desired amount of 1, 2-addition . As described in Re 27,145 the level of 1, 2-addition of a butadiene polymer or copolymer can greatly affect the clarity, rheology, and elastomeric properties of the polymer after hydrogenation . It is desired that the modifier result in a polybutadiene with 40% to 70% vinyl content. To accomplish this it is typical to use a diethyl ether: chain end ratio of greater than 1:1 mol/mol. Polymerisation may take place using the typical batch process. Certain advantages have been found, however, when a continuously stirred tank reactor or other continuous flow reactor, such as a plug flow or multiple stage flow reactor, is used, particularly if the conjugated diene is butadiene. As mentioned previously, a preferred temperature for polymerisation is from 30°C to 40°C. In a batch/semi-batch process, the PFIs are slow to initiate in this temperature range and may never completely initiate. Also, heat released by the exothermic polymerisation reaction becomes concentrated into certain regions of the batch cycle, making temperature control difficult. The use of a continuous flow reactor, such as a continuously stirred tank reactor, helps to reduce the impact of these problems. Residence time may be substantially reduced (85% to 90% reduction), further reducing the incidence of undesirable endcaps, without loss of PFI conversion because temperatures may be increased. The continuously stirring or flow also helps evenly distribute the heat load, reducing the required heat removal duties of the batch polymerisation reactor. Anionic polymerisation is often terminated by addition of water to remove the lithium as lithium hydroxide (LiOH) or by addition of an alcohol (ROH) to remove the lithium as a lithium alkoxide (LiOR) . Polymers prepared from initiators of the present invention and terminated in this way will be mono- hydroxyl functional materials (mono-ols) after removal of the trimethylsilyl ether-protecting group. To prepare polymers having an additional hydroxyl terminal functional groups, the living polymer chains are preferably terminated by addition of ethylene oxide, oxetane, or 2, 2-dimethyloxetane . To prepare polymers having an additional terminal functional group that is carboxyl, the living polymer chains are preferably terminated by addition of carbon dioxide. To prepare polymers having an additional terminal functional group that is phenolic, the living polymer chains are preferably terminated by addition of a protected hydroxystyrene monomer. To prepare polymers having an additional terminal functional group that is epoxy, the living polymer chains are preferably terminated by addition of ethylene oxide to make the lithium alkoxide (OLi) chain end which is then reacted with epichlorohydrin to make the glycidol ether epoxide . To prepare polymers having an additional terminal functional group that is an amine, the living polymer chains are preferably terminated by addition of an aziridine reagent such as that listed in U.S. Patent 4,791,174. In another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a functionalised polymer produced when 1,3- butadiene is polymerised using a initiator having the structure wherein R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are independently selected from saturated and unsaturated aliphatic and aromatic radicals, A is a hydrocarbon bridging group containing from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, and B is an alkali metal. The butadiene is polymerized in the presence of the polymerisation termination inhibitor described above. The most preferred process polymerises 1,3- butadiene at 5% to 30% solids using an initiator having the following structure: CH 3 CH 3 CH 3 —ii_O_CH 2 -C_CH 2 _Li (5) CH 3 CH 3 (3-lithio-2, 2-dimethyl-l-trimethylsilyloxypropane) . The 1, 3-butadiene is added either in batch or by programmed addition of monomer, depending upon the cooling capability of the reactor. Polymerisation occurs in the presence of triethylaluminium, a polymerisation termination inhibitor which is added such that the molar ratio of triethylaluminium to living polymer chain ends is from 0.1 to 10, preferably 0.1 to 1, more preferably from 0.5 to 1. The polymerisation reaction time is sufficient to achieve at least 80% conversion of the conjugated diene monomer to polybutadiene. More preferably 90% conversion is achieved. Most preferable is conversion in excess of 95%. After polymerisation of the desired amount of 1,3- butadiene, the living polymer is capped with ethylene oxide and reacted with methanol to give a terminal primary alcohol functional group on one end of the polymer chain. The protected functional initiator on the other end of the polymer chain is then deprotected. For example, the silyl ether group on the other end of the chain is then converted to a primary, neopentyl-type hydroxyl group by reaction with aqueous acid or aqueous base affording a telechelic dihydroxy polymer product. Hydrogenation of at least 90%, preferably at least 95%, of the unsaturation in low molecular weight butadiene polymers is achieved with nickel catalyst as described in US Patents Re. 27,145, 4,970,254, and 5,166,277 which are incorporated by reference herein. After polymerisation and, optionally, hydrogenation and washing of the polymer, the trimethylsilyl ether group at the front of the polymer chain is removed to generate the desired primary, neopentyl-type hydroxyl functional group. This step is often referred to as deprotection . A variety of processes for removal of the silyl protecting group are known; for a review, see T. W. Greene, "Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis", J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1981. Deprotection preferably involves easily handled, relatively low toxicity, inexpensive reagents and mild, low cost process conditions. In a preferred process, the trimethylsilyl ether group is removed after hydrogenation and during the aqueous acid wash for removal of the spent Ni/Al hydrogenation catalyst. This technique avoids the cost associated with a separate process step for deprotection. For the preparation of an unsaturated polymer where hydrogenation catalyst extraction is not required, contacting the polymer cement with a dilute aqueous acid or dilute aqueous base solution is preferred for deprotection. A composition of the instant invention may contain plasticisers, such as rubber extending plasticisers, or compounding oils or organic or inorganic pigments and dyes. Rubber compounding oils are well-known in the art and include both high saturates content oils and high aromatics content oils. Preferred plasticisers are highly saturated oils, e.g. TUFFLO® 6056 and 6204 oil made by Arco and process oils, e.g. SHELLFLEX® 371 oil made by Shell . The amounts of rubber compounding oil employed in the invention composition can vary from 0 to 500 phr, preferably between 0 to 100 phr, and most preferably between 0 and 60 phr. Phr means "parts per hundred rubber" which is parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of polymer wherein the polymer is referred to as the "rubber". Optional components of the present invention are stabilisers that inhibit or retard heat degradation, oxidation, skin formation and color formation. Stabilisers are typically added to the commercially available compounds in order to protect the polymers against heat degradation and oxidation during the preparation, use and high temperature storage of the composition . Various types of fillers and pigments can be included in the coating or sealant formulation. This is especially true for exterior coatings or sealants in which fillers are added not only to create the desired appeal but also to improve the performance of the coatings or sealant such as its weather-ability. A wide variety of fillers can be used. Suitable fillers include calcium carbonate, clays, talcs, silica, zinc oxide, titanium dioxide and the like. The amount of filler usually is in the range of 0 to 65 %w based on the solvent free portion of the formulation depending on the type of filler used and the application for which the coating or sealant is intended. An especially preferred filler is titanium dioxide. The dihydroxylated conjugated diene polymers of the present invention may also be blended with other polymers to improve their impact strength and/or flexibility. Such polymers are generally condensation polymers including polyamides, polyurethanes, vinyl alcohol polymers, vinyl ester polymers, polysulfones, polycarbonates and polyesters, including polyacetones, polyalkylene arylates, including polyalkylene terephthalates, having a structure formed by polycondensation of a dicarboxylic acid with a glycol. The blends may be made in the reactor or in a post compounding step. The conjugated diene polymers produced as described herein have the conventional utilities for terminally functionalised polymers such as forming adhesives, coatings, and sealants. Additionally the polymers may be used to modify polyurethanes, polyesters, polyamides, polycarbonates, and epoxy resins. The preferred polymers of the present invention are useful in adhesives (including pressure sensitive adhesives, contact adhesives, laminating adhesives and assembly adhesives), sealants (such as urethane architectural sealants, etc.), coatings (such as topcoats for automotive, epoxy primers for metal, polyester coil coatings, alkyd maintenance coatings, etc.), films (such as those requiring heat and solvent resistance) , moulded and extruded thermoplastic and thermoset parts (for example thermoplastic injection moulded polyurethane rollers or reaction injection moulded thermoset auto bumper, facie, etc.). The present invention is further described by the following examples. The examples are not intended to limit the present invention to specific embodiments. EXAMPLES Example 1 s-Buϋ + Butadiene - / ^^ TEA , ^^ , *W*^ S - Bu Li s_Bu SMe3 1.3% of product after 3 hours of reaction In a stainless steel autoclave, sec-butyllithium (s-BuLi) (67g of a 12% solution in cyclohexane, 0.125 mol) was reacted with 1, 3-butadiene (Bd) (400g, 7.4 mol) to make a living mono-initiated polymer. Polymerisation was in a cyclohexane/diethyl ether mixture (90/10 (wt/wt)). At full conversion, the mixture contained about 20%wt of a living polybutadiene. After polymerisation, Et 3 Al (TEA) (87g of a 1M solution in hexane, 0.125 mol) was added to make TEA:C-Li=l:l (mol: ol). The purpose of the added TEA was to inhibit the rate of addition of the chain ends to the added Si-0 moiety. Hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDS) (20.2g, 0.125 mol) was added as a model for the chain end of a Protected Functional Initiator (PFI) reagent. Reaction proceeded for 3 hours at 57 °C. Aliquots were taken over the course of the reaction, quenched, and analyzed by 1 H-NMR with the following results: Time (mins) % Chain Ends With Me 3 Si Cap (mol%) 0 1.7 5 1.7 15 1.8 20 1.8 30 1.8 60 2.2 120 2.5 180 3.0 The undesired side reaction, capping the living polymer chain end with the added silicon reaction, was slow in the presence of the termination inhibitor, TEA. The capping level increased by only 1.3% over the course of 3 hours at 57 °C. The sample taken at 0 time (before the addition of the HMDS reagent) had Si caps already which was due to contamination in the reactor. Comparative Example 1 s-BuLi + Butadiene ► PolyBd HMDS ^ PolyBd N s -Bu Li s-Bu SiMe 3 16.4% of product This experiment was conducted in the same manner as Example 1 with the exception that no TEA was added to inhibit the Si capping reaction. The living polymer concentration was the same (20%wt polymer) and the living polymer chain end concentration was the same. The solvent mixture was the same (cyclohexane/diethyl ether (90/10 (wt/wt) ) . The living polymer was treated with HMDS at a level such that the HMDS : C-Li=l : 1. This is the same as had been used in Example 1. Reaction with HMDS was at 53-58°C. The important difference between this experiment and that outline in Experiment 1 was that no TEA was added before the HMDS reagent was added. After 2 hours of reaction, 16.4% of the chain ends had Me 3 Si caps. This indicates that there had been a high level of reaction with HMDS, the undesired side reaction. Example 2 Me 3 SiORLi + Butadiene * » PolyBd^ TEA » ^ PolyBd Me 3 SiO Li LiO^ ^ SMe 3 + . PolyBd. where R= Me 3 SiO SiMe 3 TEA=Et 3 AI + / PolyBd . LiO Li A polymer was prepared using 3-lithio-2 , 2-dimethyl- 1-trimethylsiloxypropane (85 g of 12.2% (wt) solution in cyclohexane, 0.0625 mol), and 1, 3-butadiene (200g, 3.7 mol). Polymerisation in a cyclohexane/diethyl ether mixture (90/10 (wt/wt)) at about 30°C gave about 10%wt polymer at complete conversion. After 12 min of polymerisation, about 1 half-life, TEA (43.2g of a 1M solution in hexane, 0.062 mol) (TEA:C-Li=l (molrmol)) was added to inhibit the reaction of the living polymer chain end with the Me 3 SiO-end of the polymer chain. Aliquots were taken at timed intervals after the addition of TEA, quenched, and analyzed by " " " H-NMR with the following results: Time (mins) o 0 Ch¬ain Eiids With Me 3 Si Cap (mol%) 0 2.0 13 3.0 27 3.0 37 3.0 74 5.0 98 6.0 125 5.0 After reacting for over 2 hours at 30°C in the presence of TEA, the Si capping level had increased by only about 3 to 4 mol%. Comparative Example 2 Me 3 SiORLi + Butadiene ■ PolyBd _*• PolyBd Me 3 SiO^ "" Li LiO^ ^SiMe 3 + . PolyBd. where Me 3 SiO SiMe 3 + . PolyBd. LiO Li An experiment was conducted at the same conditions as Example 2 with the exception that none of the Si capping inhibitor reagent, TEA, was added. After two hours of reaction at a temperature of about 30°C, the Me 3 Si capping level was 14%. This is much higher than had been observed in the presence of the inhibitor, TEA. Comparative Example 3 An experiment was conducted at the same conditions as Example 2 with the exception that none of the Si capping inhibitor reagent, TEA, was added. After two hours of reaction, the Me 3 Si capping level was 15.7%. This is much higher than had been observed in the presence of the inhibitor, TEA.

Claims: C L A I M S 1. A process for making anionic polymeric di- and polyfunctional polymers, using protected functionalised initiators comprising the steps of: (a) initiating polymerisation of one or more anionically polymerisable monomers with an initiator having the structure wherein R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are independently selected from saturated and unsaturated aliphatic and aromatic radicals, A is a hydrocarbon bridging group containing from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, and B is an alkali metal; (b) polymerising one or more anionically polymerisable monomers in the presence of a polymerisation termination inhibitor which is a metal alkyl. 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the polymerisation termination inhibitor is present in a concentration such that the molar ratio of the inhibitor to the living polymer chain ends is from 0.1 to 10. 3. The process of claim 2 wherein the ratio is 0.1 to 1.0. 4. The process of claim 1 wherein the inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of trialkyl aluminium, dialkyl magnesium, dialkyl zinc compounds, and combinations thereof. 5. The process of claim 4, wherein the polymerisation termination inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of triethylaluminium, trimethylaluminium, diethylzinc, and ethylbutylmagnesium. 6. The process of claim 5 wherein the inhibitor is triethylaluminium. 7. The process of claim 1 wherein the monomer is butadiene . 8. The process of claim 1 wherein a linear or branched polymer having one or more terminal functional groups is recovered. 9. A functionalised polymer produced by a process according to any one of claims 1-8.

Inventors: BENING ROBERT CHARLES, GOODWIN DANIEL EARL, HADDIX GRANT WESLEY, POTTER MICHAEL WAYNE, SCHISLA DAVID KARL, SEMPLE THOMAS CARL, WILLIS CARL LESLEY, BENING, ROBERT, CHARLES, GOODWIN, DANIEL, EARL, HADDIX, GRANT, WESLEY, POTTER, MICHAEL, WAYNE, SCHISLA, DAVID, KARL, SEMPLE, THOMAS, CARL, WILLIS, CARL, LESLEY
Applicants: SHELL INT RESEARCH, SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ B.V.
Application year: 1999
Main classification: C08F4
IPC codes: C08F2, C08F4, C08F36