BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS TOXINS AND GENES FOR CONTROLLING COLEOPTERAN PESTS

Abstract: The subject invention concerns materials and methods useful in the control of pests and, particularly, plant pests. More specifically, the subject invention concerns novel genes and pesticidal toxins referred to as 86A1(b) and 52A1(b). In preferred embodiments, the subject toxins are used for controlling flea beetles of the genus Phyllotreta. Using the genes described herein, the transformation of plants can be accomplished using techniques known to those skilled in the art. In addition, the subject invention provides toxin genes optimized for expression in plants.

Description: DESCRIPTION BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS OXINS AND GENES FOR CONTROLLING COLEOPTERAN PESTS Cross-Reference to a Related Application This application is a continuation-m-part of application Seπal No 09/076,193, filed May 12, 1998 Background of the Invention Insects and other pests cost farmers billions of dollars annually in crop losses and in the expense of keeping these pests under control The losses caused by pests in agricultural production environments include decrease in crop yield, reduced crop quality, and increased harvesting costs Insects of the Order Coleoptera (coleopterans) are an important group of agricultural pests which cause extensive damage to crops each year There are a number of beetles that cause significant economic damage; examples include Chrysomelid beetles (such as flea beetles and corn rootworms) and Curcuhonids (such as alfalfa weevils). Flea beetles include a large number of genera (e g , Altica, Apphthona, Argopistes, Disonycha, Epitnx, Longitarsus, Prodagricomela, Systena, Psyllwdes, and Phyllotreta) Phyllotreta striolata includes the stπped flea beetle Phyllotreta cruciferae includes the canola flea beetle, the rape flea beetle, and the crucifer flea beetle Canola, also known as rape, is an oil seed brassica (e g , Brassica campestris, Brassica rapa, Brassica napus, and Brassica juncea) Flea beetles include a large number of beetles that feed on the leaves of a number of grasses, cereals, and herbs Phyllotreta cruciferae, Phyllotreta striolata, and Phyllotreta undulata, are particularly destructive annual pests that attack the leaves, stems, pods, and root tissues of susceptible plants. Psyllwdes chrysocephala, a flea beetle, is also a destructive, biennial pest that attacks the stems and leaves of susceptible plants. Chemical pesticides have provided effective pest control; however, the public has become concerned about contamination of food with residual chemicals and of the environment, including soil, surface water, and ground water. Working with pesticides may also pose hazards to the persons applying them. Stringent new restrictions on the use of pesticides and the elimination of some effective pesticides form the marketplace could limit economical and effective options for controlling costly pests In addition, the regular use of pesticides for the control of unwanted organisms can select for resistant strains This has occurred in many species of economically important insects and other pests The development of pesticide resistance necessitates a continuing search for new control agents having different modes of action Thus, there is an urgent need to identify new methods and compositions for controlling pests, such as the many different types of coleopterans that cause considerable damage to susceptible plants Certain strains of the soil microbe Bacillus thuringiensis (B t ), a Gram-positive, spore- forming bacteπum. can be characteπzed by parasporal crystalline protein inclusions These inclusions often appear microscopically as distinctively shaped crystals The proteins can be highly toxic to pests and are specific m their toxic activity These δ-endotoxins, which are produced by certain B t strains, are synthesized by sporulatmg cells Certain types of 5 t toxms, upon being ingested by a susceptible insect, are transformed into biologically active moieties by the insect gut juice proteases The pπmary target is cells of the insect gut epithelium, which are rapidly destroyed by the toxm Certain Bacillus toxm genes have been isolated and sequenced The cloning and expression of a B t crystal protein gene m Escherichia coh has been described in the published literature In addition, with the use of genetic engmeeπng techniques, new approaches for dehveπng these Bacillus toxins to agricultural environments are under development, including the use of plants genetically engineered with toxin genes for insect resistance and the use of stabilized intact microbial cells as B t endotoxin delivery vehicles Recombmant DNA-based B t products have been produced and approved for use Thus, isolated Bacillus toxm genes are becoming commercially valuable Until fairly recently, commercial use of B t pesticides has been largely restπcted to a naπow range of lepidopteran (caterpillar) pests Preparations of the spores and crystals of B thuringiensis subsp kurstaki have been used for many years as commercial insecticides for lepidopteran pests For example, B thuringiensis var kurstaki HD- 1 produces a crystalline δ- endotoxin which is toxic to the larvae of a number of lepidopteran insects In recent years, however, new subspecies of B t have been identified, and investigators have discovered B t pesticides with specificities for a much broader range of pests For example, other species of B t , namely israelensis and momsoni (a k a tenebrwnis, a.k.a B t M-7, a.k.a. B t san diegό), have been used commercially to control insects of the orders Diptera and Coleoptera, respectively. Hδfte and Whiteley (Hofte, H., H.R. Whiteley [1989] Microbiological Reviews 52(2):242-255) classified B.t. crystal protein genes into four major classes. The classes were Cryl (Lepidoptera-specific), Cryll (Lepidoptera- and Diptera-specific), Crylll (Coleoptera- specific), and CrylV (Diptera-specific). CryV and CryVI were proposed to designate a class of tox genes that are nematode-specific. Other classes of B.t. genes have now been identified. The 1989 nomenclature and classification scheme of Hofte and Whiteley for crystal proteins was based on both the deduced amino acid sequence and the host range of the toxm. That system was adapted to cover 14 different types of tox genes which were divided into five major classes. As more toxm genes were discovered, that system started to become unworkable, as genes with similar sequences were found to have significantly different msecticidal specificities. A revised nomenclature scheme has been proposed which is based solely on ammo acid identity (Cπckmore et al. [1996] Society for Invertebrate Pathology, 29th Annual Meeting, 3rd International Colloquium on Bacillus thuringiensis, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spa , September 1-6, abstract). The mnemonic "cry ' ' ' ' has been retained for all of the toxin genes except cytA and cytB, which remain a separate class. Roman numerals have been exchanged for Arabic numerals in the pπmary rank, and the parentheses in the tertiary rank have been removed. Many of the original names have been retained, with the noted exceptions, although a number have been reclassified. See also "Revisions of the Nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis Pesticidal Crystal Proteins," N. Cπckmore, D.R. Zeigler, J. Feitelson, E Schnepf, J Van Rie, D. Lereclus, J. Baum, and D H. Dean, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews (1998) Vol. 62:807-813; and Cπckmore, Zeigler, Feitelson, Schnepf, Van Rie, Lereclus, Baum, and Dean, "Bacillus thuringiensis toxm nomenclature" (1999) http://www.biols.susx.ac.uk/Home/Neil_Cnckmore/ Bt/index.html. That system uses the freely available software applications CLUSTAL W and PHYLIP. The NEIGHBOR application within the PHYLIP package uses an aπthmetic averages (UPGMA) algoπthm. B.t. isolate PS86A1 is disclosed in the following U.S. patents: 4,849,217 (activity against alfalfa weevil); 5,208,017 (activity against corn rootworm); 5,286,485 (activity against lepidopterans); and 5,427,786 (activity against Phyllotreta genera). A gene from PS86A1 was cloned into B.t MR506, which is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,670,365 (activity against nematodes) and PCT international patent application publication no. WO93/04587 (activity against lepidopterans). The sequences of a gene and a CryόA (Cry VIA) toxm from PS86A1 are disclosed m the following U.S. patents: 5,186,934 (activity against Hypera genera); 5,273,746 (lice); 5,262,158 and 5,424,410 (activity against mites); as well as in PCT international patent application publication no WO94/23036 (activity against wireworms) U.S. Patent Nos. 5,262,159 and 5,468,636, disclose PS86A1, the sequence of a gene and toxm therefrom, and a geneπc formula for toxins having activity against aphids. B.t isolate PS52A1 is disclosed by the following U.S patents as being active against nematodes: 4,861,595; 4,948,734, 5,093,120, 5,262,399, 5,236,843, 5,322,932; and 5,670,365. PS52A1 is also disclosed in 4,849,217, supra, and PCT international patent application publication no WO95/02694 (activity against Calhphoridae) The sequences of a gene and a nematode-active toxm from PS52A1 are disclosed in U S. Patent No 5,439,881 and European patent application publication no EP 0462721. PS52A1, the sequence of a gene and nematode- active toxm therefrom, and a geneπc formula for CryVIA toxins are disclosed in PCT international patent application publication no WO 92/19739 As a result of extensive research, other patents have issued for new B t isolates and new uses of B t isolates However, the discovery of new Bacillus isolates, toxms, and genes, and new uses of known B t isolates remains an empirical, unpredictable art Although.? t strains PS86A1 and PS52A1, and a gene and toxm therefrom, were known to have certain pesticidal activity, additional genes encoding active toxms from these isolates were not previously known in the art Brief Summary of the Invention The subject invention provides novel genes encoding pesticidal toxms Preferred, novel toxin genes of the subject invention are designated 86Al(b) and 52Al(b) These genes encode tox s that are active against plant pests, preferably insects, preferably coleopterans, and most preferably flea beetles of the genus Phyllotreta. In a preferred embodiment, the subject invention concerns plants and plant cells transformed with at least one polynucleotide sequence of the subject invention such that the transformed plant cells express pesticidal toxms in tissues consumed by the target pests. Plants are transformed in this manner in order to confer pest resistance upon said plants In these preferred embodiments, pests contact the toxms expressed by the transformed plant by ingesting or consuming the plant tissues expressing the toxm. Such transformation of plants can be accomplished using techniques known to those skilled in the art. Proteins expressed in this manner are better protected from environmental degradation and inactivation There are numerous other benefits of using transformed plants of the subject invention. In an alternative embodiment, B.t isolates of the subject mvention, or recombmant microbes expressmg the toxms descπbed herein, can be used to control pests. Thus, the subject invention includes substantially intact B.t cells, and recombmant cells containing the expressed toxins of the mvention, treated to prolong the pesticidal activity when the substantially intact cells are applied to the environment of a target pest. The treated cell acts as a protective coating for the pesticidal toxm. The toxm becomes active upon gestion by a target insect. Another aspect of the subject invention includes synthetic, plant-optimized B.t. genes that are particularly well suited for providing stable maintenance and expression in the transformed plant. Bnef Description of the Sequences SEQ ID NO. 1 is a forward ohgonucleotide probe for 52Al(b) and 86Al(b). SEQ ID NO. 2 is a nucleotide sequence of a gene encoding the 86Al(b) toxm. SEQ ID NO. 3 is an ammo acid sequence of the 86Al(b) toxin. SEQ ID NO. 4 is a nucleotide sequence of a gene encoding the 52Al(b) toxm. SEQ ID NO. 5 is an amino acid sequence of the 52Al(b) toxm. SEQ ID NO. 6 is a nucleotide sequence of the plant-optimized MR510 gene. SEQ ID NO.7 is an ammo acid sequence encoded by the plant-optimized MR510 gene. SEQ ID NO. 8 is a preferred, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) toxin. In the gene encoding this tox (and for the genes encoding all of the following ammo acid sequences shown in SEQ ID NOS. 9-19), the initiator codon for methionme has been added so that the N-terminal ammo acid is methionme and not leucme (leucme is the first ammo acid in the native protein) This truncation and the proteins shown in SEQ ID NOS. 9-13 have N- termmal deletions from the native protein The natural 52Al(b) end is otherwise used in these truncations. After the first ammo acid, this truncated toxm begins with ammo acid 10 of the native protein. That is, the first 9 amino acids of the native protein have been replaced in favor of the single amino acid methionme. The remaining (C-termmal) portion of this toxm is the same as that of the native protein. In preferred embodiments, two stop codons are used in the gene encoding this toxm as well as in the genes encoding the following truncated proteins (SEQ ID NOS. 9-19). SEQ ED NO. 9 is another preferred, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) protein. This protein compπses methionme added to the native protein beginning at ammo acid 21 of the native protein. Thus, the first 20 N-termmal ammo acids of the native protein have been replaced with methionme. SEQ ID NO. 10 is another preferred, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) protein. In this truncation, the first 26 N-terminal am o acids of the native protein have been replaced with methionme. SEQ ID NO. 11 is another preferred, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) protein. In this truncation, the first 41 N-termmal ammo acids of the native protein have been replaced with methionme. SEQ ID NO. 12 is another preferred, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) protein. In this truncation, the first 52 N-termmal ammo acids of the native protein have been replaced with methionme. SEQ ID NO. 13 is another preferred, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) protein. In this truncation, the first 74 N-termmal ammo acids of the native protein have been replaced with methionme. SEQ ID NO. 14 is another preferred, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) protein. In this truncation (and m the remaining truncations shown in SEQ ID NOS. 15-19), the natural beginning of the 52Al(b) protein (with the exception that leucme has been replaced with methionme) is used. Thus, these toxms (and the genes encoding them) are the result of making C-terminal deletions to the native protein. In this truncated protein, 93 ammo acids are removed from the C-termmus of the native protein. Thus, this truncated protein ends with amino acid 269 of the native protein. SEQ ID NO. 15 is another preferred, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) protein. In this truncated protein, 82 amino acids are removed from the C-termmus of the native protein. Thus, this truncated protein ends with ammo acid 280 of the native protein. SEQ ID NO. 16 is another preferred, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) protein. In this truncated protein, 74 ammo acids are removed from the C-termmus of the native protein. Thus, this truncated protein ends with ammo acid 288 of the native protein. SEQ ID NO. 17 is another preferred, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) protein. In this truncated protein, 30 ammo acids are removed from the C-termmus of the native protein. Thus, this truncated protein ends with ammo acid 332 of the native protein. SEQ ED NO. 18 is another preferred, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) protein. In this truncated protein, 20 ammo acids are removed from the C-termmus of the native protein. Thus, this truncated protein ends with ammo acid 342 of the native protein. SEQ ID NO. 19 is another prefeπed, truncated version of the full-length, native 52Al(b) protein. In this truncated protein, three amino acids are removed from the C-termmus of the native protein. Thus, this truncated protein ends with ammo acid 359 of the native protein. Detailed Disclosure of the Invention The subject invention provides novel genes encoding pesticidal toxms. Preferred, novel toxm genes of the subject invention are designated 86Al(b) and 52Al(b). These genes encode toxms that are active against (which can be used to control, or which are toxic to, or which are lethal to) plant pests, preferably insects, preferably coleopterans, and most preferably flea beetles of the genus Phyllotreta. The use of the subject genes and toxins for controlling other pests, such as pests of the genus Psyllwdes, is also contemplated In a preferred embodiment, the subject invention concerns plants and plant cells transformed with at least one polynucleotide sequence of the subject invention such that the transformed plant cells express pesticidal toxms m tissues consumed by the target pests. Plants are transformed in this manner in order to confer pest resistance upon said plants. In these preferred embodiments, pests contact the toxms expressed by the transformed plant by ingesting or consuming the plant tissues expressing the toxm. Such transformation of plants can be accomplished using techniques known to those skilled in the art. Proteins expressed in this manner are better protected from environmental degradation and inactivation. There are numerous other benefits of using transformed plants of the subject invention In an alternative embodiment, B.t isolates of the subject invention, or recombmant microbes expressing the toxms descπbed herein, can be used to control pests. Thus, the subject invention includes substantially mtact B.t cells, and recombmant cells containing the expressed toxms of the invention. These cells can be treated to prolong the pesticidal activity when the substantially intact cells are applied to the environment of a target pest. See, e.g., U.S. Patent Nos. 4,695,462; 4,861,595; and 4,695,455. The treated cell acts as a protective coating for the pesticidal toxm. The toxm becomes active upon ingestion by a target insect. Characteπstics of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates PS86A1 and PS52A1, such as colony moφhology, inclusion type, and the sizes of alkali-soluble proteins (by SDS-PAGE), have been disclosed m, for example, U.S. Patents No. 5,427,786 and published PCT application WO 95/02694, respectively. Isolates useful according to the subject invention are available by virtue of deposits descπbed in vaπous U.S. patents. Examples of such patents are discussed m more detail in the Background section, supra. The cultures disclosed in this application have been deposited in the Agricultural Research Service Patent Culture Collection (NRRL), Northern Regional Research Center, 1815 North University Street, Peoπa, Illinois 61604, USA Table 1. Culture Repository Accession No. Deposit date B.t. var. wuhanensis PS86A1 NRRL B- 18400 August 16, 1988 B.t. var. wuhanensis PS52A1 NRRL B- 18245 July 28, 1987 The subject cultures have been deposited under conditions that assure that access to the cultures will be available duπng the pendency of this patent application to one determined by the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to be entitled thereto under 37 CFR 1 14 and 35 U.S.C. 122 The deposits are available as required by foreign patent laws in countπes wherein counterparts of the subject application, or its progeny, are filed. However, it should be understood that the availability of a deposit does not constitute a license to practice the subject invention in derogation of patent rights granted by governmental action. Further, the subject culture deposits will be stored and made available to the public m accord with the provisions of the Budapest Treaty for the Deposit of Microorganisms, i e . they will be stored with all the care necessary to keep them viable and uncontaminated for a period of at least five years after the most recent request for the furnishing of a sample of a deposit, and in any case, for a peπod of at least thirty (30) years after the date of deposit or for the enforceable life of any patent which may issue disclosing the cultures The depositor acknowledges the duty to replace the deposits should the depository be unable to furnish a sample when requested, due to the condition of the deposits. All restrictions on the availability to the public of the subject culture deposits will be irrevocably removed upon the granting of a patent disclosing them. Genes and toxms. Certain DNA sequences of the subject invention have been specifically exemplified herein. These sequences are exemplary of the subject invention. It should be readily apparent that the subject invention includes not only the genes and sequences specifically exemplified herein but also equivalents, vaπants, vaπations, mutants, fusions, chimeπcs, truncations, fragments, and smaller genes that exhibit the same or similar characteristics relating to pesticidal activity and expression in plants, as compared to those specifically disclosed herein. Fragments of the genes and toxms specifically exemplified herein which retain the pesticidal activity of the exemplified toxms are within the scope of the subject invention. Genes and toxins useful according to the subject invention include not only the full length sequences but also fragments of these sequences which retain the characteπstic pesticidal activity of the toxms specifically exemplified herein. Vaπant DNA sequences are within the scope of the subject invention. As used herein, "vaπants" and "equivalents" refer to sequences which have nucleotide (or ammo acid) substitutions, deletions, additions, or insertions which do not mateπally affect the expression of the subject genes, and the resultant pesticidal activity of the encoded toxms, particularly m plants. As used herein, the terms "vaπants" or "vaπations" of genes refer to nucleotide sequences which encode the same toxms or which encode equivalent toxms having pesticidal activity As used herein, the term "equivalent toxms" refers to toxms having the same or essentially the same biological activity against the target pests as the exemplified toxms. Genes can be modified, and vaπations of genes may be readily constructed, as would be known to one skilled in the art. For example, U.S. Patent No. 5,605,793 describes methods for generating additional molecular diversity by using DNA reassembly after random fragmentation. Standard techniques are available for making point mutations. The use of site- directed mutagenesis is known in the art. Fragments of the subject genes can be made using commercially available exonucleases or endonucleases according to standard procedures. For example, enzymes such as Bal31 or can be used to systematically cut off nucleotides from the ends of these genes. Useful genes may be obtained using a variety of restπction enzymes. Proteases may be used to directly obtain active fragments of these toxins Because of the redundancy of the genetic code, a variety of different DNA sequences can encode the ammo acid sequences disclosed herein. It is well within the skill of a person trained m the art to create these alternative DNA sequences encoding the same, or essentially the same, toxms. These variant DNA sequences are withm the scope of the subject invention. As used herein, reference to "essentially the same" sequence refers to sequences which have ammo acid substitutions, deletions, additions, or insertions which do not materially affect pesticidal activity. It should be apparent to a person skilled in this art that, given the sequences of the genes and toxins as set forth herein, the genes and toxms of the subject invention can be obtained through several means. For example, the subject genes may be constructed synthetically by using a gene synthesizer. The subject genes and toxms can also be deπved from wild-type genes and toxms from isolates deposited at a culture depository as descπbed above. Equivalent toxins and/or genes encoding these equivalent toxms can be deπved from Bacillus isolates and or DNA libraries using the teachings provided herein As the skilled artisan would readily recognize, DNA can exist in a double-stranded form In this arrangement, one strand is complementary to the other strand and vice versa The "coding strand" is often used in the art to refer to the strand having a series of codons (a codon is three nucleotides that can be read three-at-a-time to yield a particular ammo acid) that can be read as an open reading frame (ORF) to form a protein or peptide of interest In order to express a protein in vivo, a strand of DNA is typically translated into a complementary strand of RNA which is used as the template for the protein As DNA is replicated m a plant (for example) additional, complementary strands of DNA are produced Thus, the subject invention includes the use of either the exemplified polynucleotides shown m the attached sequence listing or the complementary strands RNA and PNA (peptide nucleic acids) that are functionally equivalent to the exemplified DNA are included in the subject invention Thus, in preferred embodiments, the direct or indirect expression of the subject polynucleotide results, directly or indirectly, in the intracellular production and maintenance of the desired polypeptide or protein There are a number of methods for obtaining the pesticidal toxms of the instant invention For example, antibodies to the pesticidal toxins disclosed and claimed herein can be used to identify and isolate toxins from a mixture of proteins Specifically, antibodies may be raised to the portions of the toxins which are most constant and most distinct from other Bacillus toxms These antibodies can then be used to specifically identify equivalent toxms with the characteπstic activity by immunoprecipitation enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), or Western blotting Antibodies to the toxms disclosed herein, or to equivalent toxms or fragments of these toxms, can readily be prepared using standard procedures m this art Certain toxms of the subject invention have been specifically exemplified herein, these toxms are merely exemplary of the toxms of the subject invention It is readily apparent that the subject invention compπses variant or equivalent toxms (and nucleotide sequences coding for equivalent toxms) having the same or similar pesticidal activity of the exemplified toxm Equivalent genes will encode toxms that have high ammo acid identity or homology with the toxins coded for by the subject genes Equivalent toxms will have ammo acid homology with an exemplified toxm This amino acid identity will typically be greater than 60%, preferably be greater than 75%, more preferably greater than 80%, more preferably greater than 90%, and can be greater than 95% These identities are as determined using standard alignment techniques Preferred methods of determining percent identity are discussed in Cπckmore et al , supra The amino acid homology will be highest in critical regions of the toxm which account for biological activity or are involved in the determination of three-dimensional configuration which ultimately is responsible for the biological activity. In this regard, certain ammo acid substitutions are acceptable and can be expected if these substitutions are in regions which are not cπtical to activity or are conservative amino acid substitutions which do not affect the three- dimensional configuration of the molecule. For example, amino acids may be placed in the following classes' non-polar, uncharged polar, basic, and acidic. Conservative substitutions whereby an ammo acid of one class is replaced with another amino acid of the same type fall within the scope of the subject invention so long as the substitution does not mateπally alter the biological activity of the compound Table 2 provides a listing of examples of amino acids belonging to each class. Table 2. Class of Ammo Acid Examples of Ammo Acids Nonpolar Ala, Val, Leu, He, Pro, Met, Phe, Tφ Uncharged Polar Gly, Ser, Thr, Cys, Tyr, Asn, Gin Acidic Asp, Glu Basic Lys, Arg, His In some instances, non-conservative substitutions can also be made The critical factor is that these substitutions must not significantly detract from the biological activity of the toxm. As used herein, reference to "isolated" polynucleotides and/or "purified" toxms refers to these molecules when they are not associated with the other molecules with which they would be found in nature, and would include their use in plants. Thus, reference to "isolated and puπfied" signifies the involvement of the "hand of man" as described herein. Chimeπc toxins and genes also involve the "hand of man." Full length B t toxms can be expressed and then converted to active, truncated forms through the addition of appropπate reagents and/or by growing the cultures under conditions which result m the truncation of the proteins through the fortuitous action of endogenous proteases. In an alternative embodiment, the full length toxin may undergo other modifications to yield the active form of the toxm. Adjustment of the solubihzation of the toxm, as well as other reaction conditions, such as pH, ionic strength, or redox potential, can be used to effect the desired modification of the toxin. Truncated toxms of the subject invention can be obtained by treating the crystalline δ-endotoxm of Bacillus thuringiensis with a serme protease such as bovme trypsin at an alkaline pH and preferably in the absence of β-mercaptoethanol. Chimeπc and/or fusion genes and toxms (typically produced by either combining portions from more than one Bacillus toxm or gene, or by combining full-length genes and tox s, and combinations thereof) may also be utilized according to the teachings of the subject invention. The subject invention includes the use of all or part of the toxms and genes m the production of fusion proteins and fusion genes. Chimeπc toxms can also be produced by combining portions of multiple toxms. Methods have been developed for making useful chimeπc toxms by combining portions of B.t. crystal proteins. The portions which are combined need not, themselves, be pesticidal so long as the combination of portions creates a chimeπc protein which is pesticidal. This can be done using restriction enzymes, as descπbed in, for example, European Patent 0 228 838; Ge, A.Z., N.L. Shivarova, D.H. Dean (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:4037-4041; Ge, A.Z., D. Rivers, R. Milne, D.H. Dean (1991) J Bwl Chem 266:17954-17958; Schnepf, H.E., K. Tomczak, J.P. Ortega, H.R. Whiteley (1990) J. Biol. Chem 265:20923-20930; Honee, G., D. Convents, J. Van Rie, S. Jansens, M. Peferoen, B. Visser (1991) Mol. Mwrobwl. 5:2799-2806. Alternatively, recombination using cellular recombination mechanisms can be used to achieve similar results. See, for example, Caramon, T., A.M. Albertini, A. Gahzzi (1991) Gene 98:37- 44; Widner, W.R., H.R. Whiteley (1990) J. Bacterwl. 172:2826-2832; Bosch, D., B. Schipper, H. van der Kliej, R.A. de Maagd, W.J. Stickema (1994) Biotechnology 12:915-918. A number of other methods are known in the art by which such chimeπc DNAs can be made. The subject invention is meant to include chimenc proteins that utilize the novel sequences identified m the subject application. In addition, toxins of the subject invention may be used in combination with each other or with other toxms to achieve enhanced pest control. Of course, this includes the use of the subject toxins with different toxms in pest-control schemes designed to control pests that might have developed resistance against one or more toxms. With the teachings provided herein, one skilled m the art could readily produce and use the various toxms and polynucleotide sequences descπbed herein. Recombmant hosts and other application methods. The toxm-encodmg genes of the subject invention can be introduced into a wide vanety of microbial or plant hosts. As used herein, the term "heterologous" gene refers to a gene that does not naturally occur in the host that is transformed with the gene. In preferred embodiments, expression of the toxm gene results, directly or indirectly, m the mtracellular production and maintenance of the pesticide. When transformed plants of the subject invention are ingested by the pest, the pests will ingest the toxm. The result is a control of the pest. Benefits oϊinplanta expression of the toxm proteins include improved protection of the pesticide from environmental degradation and inactivation. In planta use also avoids the time and expense of spraying or otherwise applying organisms and/or the toxm to the plant or the site of the pest in order to contact and control the target pest. The subject B.t. toxin genes can be introduced via a suitable vector into a host, preferably a plant host. There are many compatible crops of interest, such as corn, cotton, and sunflowers. Synthetic, plant-optimized genes, as exemplified herein, are particularly well suited for providing stable maintenance and expression of the gene in the transformed plant In some embodiments of the subject invention, transformed microbial hosts can be used m preliminary steps for prepaπng precursors that will eventually be used to transform plant cells and/or plants. Microbes transformed and used in this manner are withm the scope of the subject invention. Recombmant microbes may be, for example, B.t., E. coh, or Pseudomonas (such as Pseudomons fluorescens). Transformations can be made by those skilled in the art using standard techniques. Mateπals necessary for these transformations are disclosed herein or are otherwise readily available to the skilled artisan As an alternative to using plants transformed with a gene of the subject invention, the B t. isolates, or recombmant microbes expressing the toxins described herein, can be used to control pests The B t isolates of the invention can be cultured using standard art media and fermentation techniques. Upon completion of the fermentation cycle, the bacteria can be harvested by first separating the B.t spores and crystals from the fermentation broth by means well known in the art. The recovered B.t. spores, crystals, and/or toxms can be formulated into wettable powders, liquid concentrates, granules, or other formulations by the addition of surfactants, dispersants, inert earners and other components to facilitate handling and application for particular target pests. These formulation and application procedures are all well known in the art. The subject invention also includes mutants of the above B.t isolates which have substantially the same pesticidal properties as the parent B.t. isolates. Mutants can be made by procedures well known in the art. Ultraviolet light and mtrosoguanidme are used extensively toward this end. An asporogenous mutant can be obtained through ethylmethane sulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis of an isolate. Suitable microbial hosts, e.g. , Pseudomonas, transformed to express one or more genes of the subject invention can be applied to the situs of the pest, where the transformed host can proliferate and/or be ingested. The result is a control of the pest. Alternatively, the microbe hosting the toxm gene can be killed and treated under conditions that prolong the activity of the toxm and stabilize the cell; the treated cell, which retains the toxic activity, then can be applied to the environment of the target pest. See, e.g., U.S. Patent Nos. 4,695,462, 4,861,595; and 4,695,455. Thus, the invention includes the treatment of substantially mtact B.t cells, and/or recombmant cells containing the expressed toxms of the mvention, treated to prolong the pesticidal activity when the substantially mtact cells are applied to the environment of a target pest. Such treatment can be by chemical or physical means, or a combination of chemical or physical means, so long as the technique does not deleteπously affect the properties of the pesticide, nor dimmish the cellular capability m protecting the pesticide The treated cell acts as a protective coating for the pesticidal toxm. The toxm becomes available to act as such upon mgestion by a target insect. Synthetic, plant-optimized genes. Preferred synthetic B t genes according to the present invention include nucleotide sequences that have: (1) more plant prefened codons than the native B.t. gene, (2) a frequency of codon usage that is closer to the codon frequency of the intended plant host than the native B t. gene, or (3) substantially all codons compπsed of the codon that has the highest frequency in the intended plant host. While the subject invention provides specific embodiments of synthetic genes that are particularly useful m transformed plants, other genes that are functionally equivalent to the genes exemplified herein can also be used to transform hosts, preferably plant hosts. Additional guidance for the production of synthetic genes for use m plants can be found m, for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,380,831. Polvnucleotide probes. One method for identifying useful toxins and genes is through the use of ohgonucleotide probes. These probes are detectable nucleotide sequences. Probes provide a rapid method for identifying toxm-encodmg genes. The nucleotide segments which are used as probes can be synthesized using a DNA synthesizer and standard procedures. It is well known that DNA possesses a fundamental property called base complementaπty. In nature, DNA ord aπly exists m the form of pairs of anti-parallel strands, the bases on each strand projecting from that strand toward the opposite strand. The base adenme (A) on one strand will always be opposed to the base thymine (T) on the other strand, and the base guanme (G) will be opposed to the base cytosme (C). The bases are held in apposition by their ability to hydrogen bond in this specific way. Though each individual bond is relatively weak, the net effect of many adjacent hydrogen bonded bases, together with base stacking effects, is a stable joining of the two complementary strands. These bonds can be broken by treatments such as high pH or high temperature, and these conditions result in the dissociation, or "denaturation," of the two strands. If the DNA is then placed under conditions which make hydrogen bonding of the bases thermodynamically favorable, the DNA strands will anneal, or "hybridize," and reform the original double stranded DNA. If carried out under appropriate conditions, this hybπdization can be highly specific. That is, only strands with a high degree of base complementanty will be able to form stable double stranded structures The relationship of the specificity of hybπdization to reaction conditions is well known. Thus, hybπdization may be used to test whether two pieces of DNA are complementary in their base sequences. It is this hybπdization mechanism which facilitates the use of probes to readily detect and characteπze DNA sequences of interest. The probes may be RNA, DNA, or PNA (peptide nucleic acid). The probe will normally have at least about 10 bases, more usually at least about 17 bases, and may have up to about 100 bases or more. Longer probes can readily be utilized, and such probes can be, for example, several kilobases m length. The probe sequence is designed to be at least substantially complementary to a portion of a gene encoding a toxm of interest. The probe need not have perfect complementanty to the sequence to which it hybndizes. The probes may be labelled utilizing techniques which are well known to those skilled in this art. One approach for the use of probes entails first identifying by Southern blot analysis of a gene bank of the Bacillus isolate all DNA segments homologous with the disclosed nucleotide sequences. Thus, it is possible, without the aid of biological analysis, to know in advance the probable activity of many new Bacillus isolates, and of the individual gene products expressed by a given Bacillus isolate. Such a probe analysis provides a rapid method for identifying potentially commercially valuable msecticidal toxm genes within the multifarious subspecies of B.t The particular hybndization technique is not essential. As improvements are made in hybridization techniques, they can be readily applied. One useful hybπdization procedure typically includes the initial steps of isolating the DNA sample of interest and purifying it chemically. Either lysed bacteria or total fractionated nucleic acid isolated from bacteπa can be used. Cells can be treated using known techniques to liberate their DNA (and or RNA). The DNA sample can be cut into pieces with an appropπate restπction enzyme. The pieces can be separated by size through electrophoresis m a gel, usually agarose or acrylamide. The pieces of interest can be transferred to an immobilizing membrane. The probe and sample can then be combined in a hybπdization buffer solution and held at an appropnate temperature until annealing occurs. Thereafter, the membrane is washed free of extraneous mateπals, leaving the sample and bound probe molecules typically detected and quantified by autoradiography and/or liquid scintillation counting. As is well known m the art, if the probe molecule and nucleic acid sample hybπdize by forming a strong non-covalent bond between the two molecules, it can be reasonably assumed that the probe and sample are essentially identical. The probe's detectable label provides a means for determining in a known manner whether hybridization has occurred. In the use of the nucleotide segments as probes, the particular probe is labeled with any suitable label known to those skilled in the art, including radioactive and non-radioactive labels. Typical radioactive labels include 32 P, 35 S, or the like Non-radioactive labels include, for example, hgands such as biotm or thyroxine, as well as enzymes such as hydrolases or penxodases, or the various chemilummescers such as lucifenn, or fluorescent compounds like fluorescem and its derivatives The probes can be made inherently fluorescent as described in International Application No WO 93/16094. Various degrees of stringency of hybπdization can be employed, as described below. The more stπngent the conditions, the greater the complementarity that is required for duplex formation. Stnngency can be controlled by temperature, probe concentration, probe length, ionic strength, time, and the like. Preferably, hybπdization is conducted under moderate to high stnngency conditions by techniques well known m the art, as described, for example, in Keller, G.H., M.M. Manak (1987) DNA Probes, Stockton Press, New York, NY , pp 169-170. Hybπdization of immobilized DNA on Southern blots with 32 P-labeled gene-specific probes can be performed by standard methods (Mamatis et al [1982] Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spnng Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY). In general, hybridization and subsequent washes can be earned out under low, moderate, and/or high stringency conditions that allow for detection of target sequences with homology to the exemplified toxm genes For double-stranded DNA gene probes, hybπdization can be earned out overnight at 20-25° C below the melting temperature (Tm) of the DNA hybrid in 6X SSPE, 5X Denhardt's solution, 0.1% SDS, 0.1 mg/ml denatured DNA The melting temperature is descπbed by the following formula (Beltz, G.A., K.A. Jacobs, T.H. Eickbush, P.T Cherbas, and F.C. Kafatos [1983] Methods of Enzymology, R. Wu, L. Grossman and K. Moldave [eds.] Academic Press, New York 100:266-285). Tm=81.5°C+16.6 Log[Na + ]+0.41(%G+C)-0.61(%formamιde)-600/length of duplex in base pairs. Washes are typically carried out as follows: (1) Twice at room temperature for 15 minutes in IX SSPE, 0.1% SDS (low stnngency wash). (2) Once at Tm-20°C for 15 minutes in 0.2X SSPE, 0.1% SDS (moderate stringency wash). Other low stnngency washes include 6X SSPE, 0.1% SDS at 37°C or 2X SSPE, 0.1% SDS at Tm -20°C. For oligonucleotide probes, hybπdization can be earned out overnight at 10-20°C below the melting temperature (Tm) of the hybnd m 6X SSPE, 5X Denhardt's solution, 0.1% SDS, 0.1 mg/ml denatured DNA. Tm for oligonucleotide probes can be determined by the following formula: Tm (°C)=2(number T/A base pairs) +4(number G/C base pairs) (Suggs, S V , T. Miyake, E.H. Kawashime, M.J. Johnson, K. Itakura, and R.B. Wallace [1981] ICN-UCLA Symp. Dev. Biol. Using Purified Genes, D.D. Brown [ed.], Academic Press, New York, 23:683-693). Washes are typically carried out as follows' (1) Twice at room temperature for 15 minutes IX SSPE, 0.1% SDS (low stringency wash). (2) Once at the hybndization temperature for 15 minutes m IX SSPE, 0.1% SDS (moderate stnngency wash). In general, salt and/or temperature can be altered to change stringency. In addition, formamide or aqueous washes can be used. Formamide washes require a lower temperature than aqueous washes. With a labeled DNA fragment >70 or so bases in length, the following conditions (aqueous washes) can be used: Low: 1 or 2X SSPE, room temperature Low: l or 2X SSPE, 42°C Moderate: 0.2X or IX SSPE, 65 °C High: 0. IX SSPE, 65 °C. Duplex formation and stability depend on substantial complementanty between the two strands of a hybnd, and, as noted above, a certain degree of mismatch can be tolerated. Therefore, useful probe sequences can include mutations (both single and multiple), deletions, insertions of the described sequences, and combinations thereof, wherein said mutations, insertions and deletions permit formation of stable hybπds with the target polynucleotide of interest. Mutations, insertions, and deletions can be produced in a given polynucleotide sequence in many ways, and these methods are known to an ordinarily skilled artisan; other methods may become known in the future. These variants can be used m the same manner as the ongmal pπmer sequences so long as the vanants have substantial sequence homology with the oπginal sequence. As used herein, substantial sequence homology refers to homology which is sufficient to enable the vanant probe to function m the same capacity as the ongmal probe. Preferably, this is greater than 50%; more preferably, this homology is greater than 75%; and most preferably, this homology is greater than 90% The degree of homology needed for the vanant to function in its intended capacity will depend upon the intended use of the sequence. It is well withm the skill of a person trained in this art to make mutational, insertional, and deletional mutations which are designed to improve the function of the sequence or otherwise provide a methodological advantage. PCR technology. Polymerase Cham Reaction (PCR) is a repetitive, enzymatic, primed synthesis of a nucleic acid sequence. This procedure is well known and commonly used by those skilled m this art (see Mulhs, U.S. Patent Nos 4,683,195, 4,683.202, and 4,800,159; Saiki, Randall K., Stephen Scharf, Fred Faloona, Kary B. Mul s, Glenn T. Horn, Henry A. Erhch, Norman Arnheim [1985] "Enzymatic Amplification of β-Globm Genomic Sequences and Restriction Site Analysis for Diagnosis of Sickle Cell Anemia," Science 230: 1350-1354.) PCR is based on the enzymatic amplification of a DNA fragment of interest that is flanked by two oligonucleotide pπmers that hybndize to opposite strands of the target sequence The primers are onented with the 3 ' ends pointing towards each other. Repeated cycles of heat denaturation of the template, annealing of the primers to their complementary sequences, and extension of the annealed pπmers with a DNA polymerase result m the amplification of the segment defined by the 5 ' ends of the PCR pnmers Since the extension product of each primer can serve as a template for the other pπmer, each cycle essentially doubles the amount of DNA fragment produced in the previous cycle. This results in the exponential accumulation of the specific target fragment, up to several million-fold in a few hours. By using a thermostable DNA polymerase such as Tag polymerase, which is isolated from the thermophihc bactenum Thermus aquaticus, the amplification process can be completely automated. Other enzymes which can be used are known to those skilled in the art. DNA sequences can be designed and used as pπmers for PCR amplification. In performing PCR amplification, a certain degree of mismatch can be tolerated between primer and template. Therefore, mutations, deletions, and insertions (especially additions of nucleotides to the 5 ' end) can be produced in a given pπmer by methods known to an ordmanly skilled artisan. All of the references cited herein are hereby mcoφorated by reference. Following are examples which illustrate procedures for practicing the invention. These examples should not be construed as limiting. All percentages are by weight and all solvent mixture proportions are by volume unless otherwise noted Example 1 — Cultunng the B t Isolates of the Invention A subculture of a B t isolate can be used to inoculate the following medium (a peptone, glucose, salts medium, pH 7.2) Bacto Peptone 7.5 g/1 Glucose 1.0 g/1 KH 2 P0 4 3.4 g/1 K 2 HP0 4 4 35 g/1 Salt Solution 5.0 ml/1 CaCl 2 Solution 5.0 ml/1 Salts Solution (100 ml) MgS0 4 -7H 2 0 2.46 g MnS0 4 -H 2 0 0.04 g ZnS0 4 -7H 2 0 0.28 g FeS0 4 -7H 2 0 0.40 g CaCl 2 Solution (100 ml) CaCl 2 -2H 2 0 3.66 g The salts solution and CaCl, solution are filter-steπhzed and added to the autoclaved and cooked broth at the time of inoculation. Flasks are incubated at 30° C on a rotary shaker at 200 rpm for 64 hr. The above procedure can be readily scaled up to large fermentors by procedures well known m the art. The B t spores and crystals, obtained in the above fermentation, can be isolated by procedures well known m the art A frequently-used procedure is to subject the harvested fermentation broth to separation techniques, e g., centπfugation Example 2 — Molecular Cloning. Expression, and Sequencing of Novel Toxm Genes from Bacillus thuringiensis Strains PS52A1 and PS86A1 Total cellular DNA was prepared from PS52A1 and PS86A1 Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) cells grown at 30 °C to an optical density of 1.0 at 600 nm. Cells were pelleted by centnfugation and resuspended m protoplast buffer (20 mg/mL lysozyme m 0.3M sucrose, 25 mM Tns-Cl [pH 8.0], 25 mM EDTA). After incubation at 37°C for 1 hour, protoplasts were lysed by two cycles of freezing and thawing. Nine volumes of a solution of 0.1 M NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 0.1 M Tns-Cl [pH 8.0] were added to complete lysis. The cleared lysate was extracted twice with pheno chloroform (1 : 1). Nucleic acids were precipitated with two volumes of ethanol and pelleted by centnfugation. The pellet was resuspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tns-Cl [pH 8.0], I M EDTA) and RNase was added to a final concentration of 50 μg/mL. After incubation at 37 °C for 1 hour, the solution was extracted once each with phenol: chloroform (1 : 1) and TE- saturated chloroform. From the aqueous phase, DNA was precipitated by the addition of one- tenth volume 3M NaOAc and two volumes ethanol. DNA was pelleted by centnfugation, washed with 70% ethanol, dned, and resuspended in TE buffer. Plasmid DNA was also prepared from B t strain PS86A1. The _5 . cells were grown at 30°C to an optical density of 1.0 at 600 nm. Cells were pelleted by centnfugation and resuspended in protoplast buffer (20 mg/mL lysozyme in 0.3M sucrose, 25 mM Tns-Cl [pH 8.0], 25 mM EDTA). After incubation on ice for 30 minutes, ten volumes of lysis buffer (0.085 M NaOH, 0.1% SDS in TE buffer) were added. The lysate was rocked gently at room temperature for 30 minutes. One-half volume 3M KOAc was added to the suspension for incubation at 4°C overnight. Nucleic acids were precipitated with one volume isopropanol and pelleted by centnfugation, washed with 70% ethanol, dried, and resuspended in TE buffer The DNA suspension was further punfied by extraction once with phenokchloroform (1 : 1). DNA m the aqueous phase was precipitated by the addition of one-tenth volume 3M NaOAc and one volume of isopropanol. DNA was pelleted by centnfugation, washed with 70% ethanol. dried, and resuspended in TE buffer. CsCl was added at equal weight to volume of DNA solution, and ethidium bromide was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. The plasmid DNA was separated from the extraneous nucleic acids by overnight ultracentπfugation. The recovered plasmid band was extracted five times with excess water-saturated butanol, and dialyzed against TE buffer. DNA was precipitated, pelleted, washed, dned and resuspended m TE buffer as described previously. Based on N-termmal ammo acid sequencing data of the PS86A1 45kDa polypeptide, the following "forward" oligonucleotide of sequence (SEQ ID NO 1 ) was synthesized for use m Southern hybndizations: 5 ' -TGGATAAAAAATCWATWACACATGAAGAATTTATWMGACA-3 ' wherein W=A or T, and M=A or C, according to standard IUPAC conventions. PS86A1 total cellular and plasmid DNA were digested with selected restπction endonucleases, electrophoresed on an agarose gel, subsequently blotted onto a nylon membrane, and immobilized by "baking" the membrane at 80°C. Restriction fragment length polymoφhism (RFLP) analysis was performed using the oligonucleotide probe descπbed above. Southern blots were hybπdized overnight in 6X SSPE, 5X Denhardt's solution, 0.1 mg/mL single stranded earner DNA and 0.1% SDS at 37°C. The blots were then washed m IX SSPE, 0.1%) SDS at 37°C, air-dned, then exposed to X-ray film. Autoradiography identified an approximately 6.6 kbp Xba I band m both the total cellular and plasmid DNA blots that was theonzed to contain all or part of the PS86Bl(b) toxm gene. The approximately 6.6 kbp Xba I fragment was cloned into pHTBluell (an E coli/B thuringiensis shuttle vector composed of pBluescπpt II SK- (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and the replication oπgm from a resident B t plasmid Lereclus et al. [1989] FEMS Microbiology Letters 60:211-218]). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mapping to determine if the fragment contained the full-length gene was conducted using the "forward" oligonucleotide pnmer descπbed previously and vector pπmers. The "forward" pπmer combined with vector primer T7 resulted m amplification of only an approximately 400 bp-sized fragment, instead of the approximately 1.0 kbp gene expected to encode a protein of 45 kDa length. This established that only approximately one-third of the PS86Al(b) toxm gene was cloned Further verification was provided by dideoxynucleotide sequencing (Sanger et al. [1977] Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74:5463-5467) using Sequenase (US Biochemical, Cleveland, OH) on the subgene construct. The PCR fragment was subsequently radiolabelled with 32 P and used as a probe m standard hybπdizations of Southern blots and gene libraries of PS86A1 and PS52A1 total cellular DNA. A gene library was constructed from PS86A1 total cellular DNA partially digested with Sau3A I. Partial restriction digests were fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA fragments 9.3 to 23 kbp in size were excised from the gel, electroeluted from the gel slice, purified on an Elutip-D ion exchange column (Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH), and recovered by ethanol precipitation. The Sau A I inserts were ligated into _3α HI-dιgested LambdaGem-11 (Promega, Madison, WI). Recombmant phage were packaged and plated on E. coli KW251 (Promega, Madison, WI) cells. Plaques were screened by transfer of recombmant phage DNA to filters and hybπdization with the PCR probe described previously. Hybridization was carried out overnight at 37°C in a solution consisting of 6X SSPE, 5X Denhardt's solution, 0.1 mg/mL single stranded earner DNA, and 0.1 %SDS The filters were subsequently washed in IX SSPE and 0.1% SDS at 37°C, air-dned, and then exposed to X-ray film. Hybπdizmg phage were plaque-punfied and used to infect liquid cultures of E. coli KW251 cells for isolation of DNA by standard procedures (Mamatis et al. [1982] Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spπng Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spnng Harbor, NY). Southern blotting of plaque-punfied hybridizing phage DNA digested with selected restriction endonucleases using the PCR-amplified probe and washing conditions as described above revealed an approximately 2.3 kbp EcoR V + Sal I fragment believed to contain the PS86Al(b) gene. For subcloning the PS86Al(b) gene encoding the approximately 45 kDa toxm, preparative amounts of phage DNA were digested with EcoRV and Sail. The approximately 2.3 kbp band was ligated into Smal + Sα/I-digested pHTBluell. The ligation mix was used to transform frozen, competent E coli NM522 cells (ATCC 47000). β-galactosidase-negative transformants were screened by restriction digestion of alkaline lysate plasmid mmiprep DNA. The desired plasmid construct, pMYC2344, contains the PS86Al(b) toxm gene. pMYC2344 was introduced into the acrystalliferous (Cry-) B t host, CryB (A. Aronson, Purdue Unrversity, West Lafayette, IN) by electroporation Expression of the toxm was demonstrated by visualization of crystal formation under microscopic examination, and SDS-PAGE analysis Gene construct pMYC2344 in B.t. is designated MR509. A sequence of the 86Al(b) gene is shown in SEQ ID NO. 2. A deduced ammo acid sequence for the 86Al(b) toxm is shown m SEQ ID NO. 3. The PS86Al(b) probes, hybπdization, and washing conditions were also used to clone a related gene, PS52Al(b), from Bacillus thuringiensis strain PS52A1. A gene library was constructed by partially digesting PS52A1 total cellular DNA with Sau3A 1. Partial restriction digests were fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA fragments 9.3 to 23 kbp in size were excised from the gel, electroeluted from the gel slice, punfied on an Elutip-D ion exchange column, and recovered by ethanol precipitation. The Sau3A I inserts were ligated into BamKl- digested LambdaGem- 1 1. Recombmant phage were packaged and plated on E coli KW251 cells. Plaques were screened by hybridization with the PCR probe described previously. Hybndizmg phage were plaque-punfied and used to mfect liquid cultures of E. coli KW251 cells for isolation of DNA by standard procedures. Southern blotting of plaque-punfied hybridizing phage DNA digested with selected restriction endonucleases using the PCR probe revealed an approximately 2.3 kbp EcoRV + Sail fragment believed to contain the PS52Al(b) gene. For subclonmg the PS52Al(b) gene encoding the approximately 45 kDa toxm, preparative amounts of phage DNA were digested with EcoKV and Sail. The approximately 2.3 kbp band was ligated into Smal + Sα/I-digested pHTBluell. The ligation mix was used to transform frozen, competent E. coli NM522 cells, β-galactosidase-negative transformants were screened by restπction digestion of alkaline lysate plasmid mmiprep DNA. The desired plasmid construct, pMYC2349, contains the 52Al(b) toxm gene that is novel compared to other toxin genes containing msecticidal proteins. pMYC2349 was introduced into the acrystalliferous (Cry-) B.t. host, CryB, by electroporation. Expression of the toxm was demonstrated by visualization of crystal formation under microscopic examination, and SDS-PAGE analysis. Gene construct pMYC2349 in B.t. is designated MR510. A sequence of the 52Al(b) gene is shown m SEQ ID NO. 4. A deduced ammo acid sequence for the 52Al(b) toxm is shown m SEQ ID NO. 5. Example 3 — Bioassav of the MR509 / 86A1H.1 Toxm Against Phyllotreta Wild Phyllotreta cruciferae were collected and held m reaπng chambers at 25 °C, 16L:8D photopeπod. Five canola (Hyola 401) seeds were planted in standard potting soil. Cotyledons were excised from seedlings and dipped in B t MR509 suspensions (100 ug toxm/ml) made with 0.1 % Bond (Bond served as a sticking agent). A single treated cotyledon was allowed to dry and was placed in a plastic well (NuTrend trays) containing approximately 1 ml of a 2% agar gel. The agar gel served as a moisture source to increase the longevity of the excised cotyledons. A single adult beetle was placed in each assay well. Assays were stored at room temperature. Mortality and plant damage was assessed at 4 and 7 days post treatment. Cotyledon damage was assessed on a 1-10 point scale with a scoπng of 10 corresponding to complete destruction of plant tissue. Several treatments showed reduced plant damage relative to untreated and CryB (a crystal-mmus B t. strain) controls. It was determined that the approximately 45 kda protein from MR509 was highly active against the tested Phyllotreta cruciferae pests; this toxm is referred to as the 86Al(b) gene. Example 4 - Further Bioassavs: MR509 / 86Al(b and MR510 / 52A10. , Against Phyllotreta spp MR509 and MR510 were evaluated in the following tests. CryB was used as a negative control. Other negatrve controls were untreated leaves and the Bond solution that was added as a spreader-sticker. Newly sprouted cotyledons were excised and dipped m the test suspensions. After drying, the cotyledons were infested with 2 adult flea beetles. Leaf damage was assessed at 4 days post-mfestation. Leaf damage was assessed on a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 being no damage. The clones MR509 and MR510 gave clear indications of dose dependent leaf protection. This activity was particularly evident for MR510. Example 5 - Truncations of the Native 86Alfl_) and 52Alfb) Toxms Using techniques known to those skilled in the art, some of which are discussed above, the native proteins can be truncated. These truncated toxms can be screened for activity by one skilled in the art using the guidance provided herein together with what is known in the art. Preferred, truncated proteins are shown m SEQ ID NOS. 8-19 The subject invention also includes polynucleotides that encode the exemplified, truncated proteins, as well as other truncations, fragments, and vaπants of the exemplified toxms, so long as the truncations, fragments, or vaπants retain pesticidal activity, preferrably against coleopterans, and most preferably against flea beetles Truncated toxins according to the subject invention include not only toxms having deletions m the N-termmal or C-termmal portions as exemplified herein, but also toxms having deletions to both the N-termmal and C-termmal portions of the native protein Examples of such truncations would include proteins resulting from using any of the N-termmal deletions exemplified herein together with any of the C-termmal deletions exemplified herein. Example 6 — Further Characterization of 86A1(V) and 52Al(b) Toxms A polyclonal antibody referred to as R#56 was developed and puπfied to the native toxm 52Al(b). This antibody recognizes the native 86Al(b) toxm. This antibody can be used in blotting screens (dot, slot, and/or western blots) to determine if homologs of the 52Al(b) and 86Al(b) toxms are present in other strains of Bacillus. Thus, in further embodiment of the subject invention, additional pesticidal toxms can be characteπzed and or identified by their level of reactivity with antibodies to pesticidal toxms exemplified herein. Antibodies can be raised to the specifically exemplified toxins of the subject invention. Other toxms within the scope of this invention can then be identified and/or charactenzed by their reactivity with the antibodies. In a preferred embodiment, the antibodies are polyclonal antibodies. In this embodiment, toxms with the greatest similaπty to the 86Al(b) or 52Al(b) toxms would have the greatest reactivity with the polyclonal antibodies. Toxms with greater diversity react with polyclonal antibodies, but to a lesser extent. Example 7 — Insertion of Toxin Genes Into Plants One aspect of the subject invention is the transformation of plants with genes encoding the msecticidal toxm of the present invention. The transformed plants are resistant to attack by the target pest. Preferred genes will be stably maintained and expressed at high levels in the transformed plant and/or plant cells. An example of a preferred, synthetic, plant-optimized gene is provided in SEQ ID NO. 6, which is a dicot-optimized gene deπved from MR510 The protein encoded by this gene is provided in SEQ ID NO. 7 (ammo acid abbreviations are according to standard IUPAC conventions). Genes encoding pesticidal toxms, as disclosed herein, can be inserted into plant cells using a vanety of techniques which are well known in the art. For example, a large number of cloning vectors comprising a replication system m E coli and a marker that permits selection of the transformed cells are available for preparation for the insertion of foreign genes into higher plants The vectors compnse, for example, pBR322, pUC series, M13mp series, pACYC184, etc. Accordingly, the sequence encoding the Bacillus toxin can be inserted into the vector at a suitable restπction site. The resulting plasmid is used for transformation into E coli. The E coli cells are cultivated in a suitable nutrient medium, then harvested and lysed The plasmid is recovered Sequence analysis, restriction analysis, electrophoresis, and other biochemical-molecular biological methods are generally earned out as methods of analysis. After each manipulation, the DNA sequence used can be cleaved and joined to the next DNA sequence Each plasmid sequence can be cloned in the same or other plasmids Depending on the method of inserting desired genes into the plant, other DNA sequences may be necessary. If, for example, the Ti or Ri plasmid is used for the transformation of the plant cell, then at least the πght border, but often the nght and the left border of the Ti or Ri plasmid T-DNA, has to be joined as the flanking region of the genes to be inserted The use of T-DNA for the transformation of plant cells has been intensively researched and sufficiently descπbed in EP 120 516, Hoekema (1985) In. The Binary Plant Vector System, Offset-durkkenj Kanters BN , Alblasserdam. Chapter 5, Fraley et al , Crit Rev Plant Sci 4 1- 46, and An et al (1985) EMBO J 4.277-287 Once the inserted DΝA has been integrated in the genome, it is relatively stable It normally contains a selection marker that confers on the transformed plant cells resistance to a biocide, an herbicide such as glyphosate or BASTA, or an antibiotic, such as kanamycin, G 418, bleomycm, hygromycm, or chloramphenicol, inter aha. The individually employed marker should accordingly permit the selection of transformed cells rather than cells that do not contain the inserted DΝA A large number of techniques are available for inserting DΝA into a plant host cell Those techniques include transformation with T-DΝA using Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rhizogenes as transformation agent, fusion, micro-injection, biolistics (microparticle bombardment), PEG-mediated DΝA uptake, or electroporation as well as other possible methods. If Agrobacteria are used for the transformation, the DΝA to be inserted has to be cloned into special plasmids, namely either into an intermediate vector or into a binary vector The intermediate vectors can be integrated into the Ti or Ri plasmid by homologous recombination owing to sequences that are homologous to sequences m the T-DNA. The Ti or Ri plasmid also compnses the vir region necessary for the transfer of the T-DNA. Intermediate vectors cannot replicate themselves in Agrobactena. The intermediate vector can be transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens by means of a helper plasmid (conjugation) Binary vectors can replicate themselves both in E coli and in Agrobactena. They compπse a selection marker gene and a linker or polyhnker which are framed by the πght and left T-DNA border regions. They can be transformed directly into Agrobactena (Holsters et al [1978] Mol Gen Genet 163 : 181 - 187) The Agrobacterium used as the host cell contains a plasmid carrying a vir region The vir region is necessary for the transfer of the T-DNA into the plant cell Additional T-DNA may be contained. The bacteπum so transformed is used for the transformation of plant cells. Plant explants can advantageously be cultivated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rhizogenes for the transfer of the DNA into the plant cell. Whole plants can then be regenerated from the infected plant matenal (for example, pieces of leaf, segments of stalk, roots, but also protoplasts or suspension-cultivated cells) in a suitable medium, which may contain antibiotics, herbicides, or biocides for selection The plants so obtained can then be tested for the presence of the inserted DNA. No special demands are made of the plasmids in the case of injection and electroporation. It is possible to use ordinary plasmids, such as, for example, pUC deπvatives In biohstic transformation, plasmid DNA or linear DNA can be employed The transformed cells are regenerated into moφhologically normal plants in the usual manner If a transformation event involves a germ line cell, then the inserted DNA and coπespondmg phenotypic traιt(s) will be transmitted to progeny plants Such plants can be grown in the normal manner and crossed with plants that have the same transformed hereditary factors or other hereditary factors The resulting progeny plants have the corresponding phenotypic properties according to the rules of genetic segregation In a preferred embodiment of the subject invention, plants will be transformed with genes wherein the codon usage has been optimized for plants. See. for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,380,831. Also, advantageously, DNA encoding a truncated toxm will be used. The truncated toxm typically will encode about 55% to about 80% of the full length toxm. Methods for creating synthetic Bacillus genes for use in plants are known in the art It should be understood that the examples and embodiments descnbed herein are for illustrative puφoses only and that various modifications or changes in light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled m the art and are to be included within the spint and purview of this application and the scope of the appended claims.

Claims: Claims 1. An isolated polynucleotide that encodes a pesticidal protein, wherein a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO. 1, a portion of SEQ ID NO. 2 sufficient to encode an active toxin, a portion of SEQ ID NO. 4 sufficient to encode an active toxm, and a portion of SEQ ID NO. 6 sufficient to encode an active toxm hybndizes with a nucleotide sequence, or its complement, that codes for said protein. 2. The polynucleotide according to claim 1 wherein said protein comprises at least a pesticidal portion of an ammo acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO. 3, SEQ ID NO. 5, and SEQ ID NO. 7. 3. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 3 or a pesticidal fragment thereof. 4. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 5 or a pesticidal fragment thereof. 5. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 7 or a pesticidal fragment thereof. 6. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 3. 7. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein compπses the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 5. 8. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 7. 9. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said polynucleotide compπses SEQ ID NO. 2 or a portion thereof sufficient to encode a pesticidal protein. 10. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said polynucleotide compnses SEQ ID NO. 4 or a portion thereof sufficient to encode a pesticidal protein. 11. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said polynucleotide compπses SEQ ID NO. 6 or a portion thereof sufficient to encode a pesticidal protein. 12. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said polynucleotide compπses SEQ ID NO. 2. 13. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said polynucleotide compnses SEQ ID NO. 4. 14. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said polynucleotide compπses SEQ ID NO. 6. 15. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 8. 16. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein compnses the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 9. 17. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 10. 18. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein compnses the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 11. 19. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 12. 20. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 13. 21. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 14. 22. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 15. 23. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 16. 24. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 17. 25 The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 18. 26. The polynucleotide according to claim 2 wherein said protein comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 19. 27 The polynucleotide according to claim 1 wherein said protein immunoreacts with an antibody to a toxin wherein said toxm compnses an ammo acid sequence selected from the group consisting of a pesticidal portion of SEQ ID NO 3. a pesticidal portion of SEQ ID NO 5, and a pesticidal portion of SEQ ID NO 7 28. The polynucleotide according to claim 27 wherein said toxm comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 3. 29. The polynucleotide according to claim 27 wherein said toxm compπses the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 5. 30 The polynucleotide according to claim 27 wherein said toxm comprises the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 7. 31. An isolated, pesticidal protein encoded by a polynucleotide, wherein a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO. 1, a portion of SEQ ID NO. 2 sufficient to encode an active toxm, a portion of SEQ ID NO. 4 sufficient to encode an active toxm, and a portion of SEQ ID NO. 6 sufficient to encode an active toxm hybridizes with a nucleotide sequence, or its complement, that codes for said protein. 32. An isolated, pesticidal protein that is toxic to a coleopteran pest and wherein said protem compπses at least a pesticidal portion of an ammo acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO. 3, SEQ ID NO. 5, and SEQ ID NO. 7 33. The protem according to claim 32 wherein said coleopteran pest is of the genus Phyllotreta. 34. The protem according to claim 32 wherein said protein comprises an ammo acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO. 3, SEQ ID NO 5, SEQ ID NO. 7, SEQ ID NO. 8, SEQ ID NO. 9, SEQ ID NO. 10, SEQ ID NO. 11, SEQ ID NO. 12, SEQ ID NO. 13, SEQ ID NO. 14, SEQ ID NO. 15, SEQ ID NO. 16, SEQ ID NO. 17, SEQ ID NO. 18, and SEQ ID NO. 19. 35. The protem according to claim 32 wherein said protem immunoreacts with an antibody to a tox wherein said toxm compnses an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of a pesticidal portion of SEQ ID NO. 3, a pesticidal portion of SEQ ID NO. 5, and a pesticidal portion of SEQ ID NO. 7. 36. A recombmant host compnsmg a polynucleotide that encodes a pesticidal protein, wherein a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO. 1 , a portion of SEQ ID NO. 2 sufficient to encode an active toxm, a portion of SEQ ID NO. 4 sufficient to encode an active toxm, and a portion of SEQ ID NO. 6 sufficient to encode an active toxm hybndizes with a nucleotide sequence, or its complement, that codes for said protem. 37. The host according to claim 36 wherein said host is a plant cell. 38. The host according to claim 36 wherein said host is a plant. 39. A method for controlling pests wherein said method compnses contacting said pest with a pesticidal protein encoded by a polynucleotide, wherein a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO. 1 , a portion of SEQ ID NO. 2 sufficient to encode an active toxm, a portion of SEQ ID NO. 4 sufficient to encode an active toxm, and a portion of SEQ ID NO. 6 sufficient to encode an active toxm hybndizes with a nucleotide sequence, or its complement, that codes for said protem. 40. The method according to claim 39 wherein said pests are coleopteran insects 41. The method according to claim 39 wherein said pests belong to the genus Phyllotreta.

Inventors: BRADFISCH GREGORY A, FU JENNY M, MULLER-COHN, NARVA KENNETH E, THOMPSON MARK, BRADFISCH, GREGORY, A., FU, JENNY, M., NARVA, KENNETH, E., THOMPSON, MARK
Applicants: MYCOGEN CORP, MYCOGEN CORPORATION
Application year: 1999
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: C07K14, C12N1, C12N15