MOULD STEEL

Abstract: A maraging steel for use as a mould steel is disclosed. In general, the use of maraging steels in moulds is limited by the fact that the martensitic microstructure is not stable at temperatures above 480 DEG C. The precipitate hardening maraging type steel according to the invention contains titanium, molybdenum, cobalt, chromium and nickel and has, in addition to high strength, good ductility, small thermal expansion coefficient and good thermal conductivity, a significantly better thermal stability than other maraging steels, which makes it suitable for use as a mould material particularly in pressure casting.

Description: MOULD STEEL Field of the invention The invention relates to the field of casting mould materials. Particularly, the invention relates to a steel useful in connection with pressurised casting and corresponding methods. Background of the invention In pressure casting and comparable methods, stresses on the mould are caused by the cyclic thermal shock due to the contact between molten metal and the mould steel, hydrostatic pressure due to the injection pressure, as well as mechanical and chemical abrasion of the mould surface due to the flow of molten metal. Mechanisms of mould damage are thermal fatigue, macrocracking and so-called wash out occurring as a consequence of erosion, corrosion and welding phenomena. The dominant mechanism of damage is partly dependant on the cast metal, the size and shape of the mould and the mould material. The most common cause of damage is hot cracking, which is the cause of about 85 % of damage cases. Hot cracking is reticular cracking on the mould surface caused by thermal fatigue. Unlike ordinary fatigue, thermal fatigue is not due to fluctuating external stresses, but the cyclic tension and distortion resulting in cracking is caused by temperature variations. On the basis of theoretical studies, it can be concluded that from the point of view of hot cracking resistance, the yield strength of the mould material should be high and as independent as possible of temperature and number of cycles, i.e. the material should be thermally stable. In addition to hot cracking, wash out is another main mechanism leading to mould damage. Wash out refers to the removal of material from the mould surface due to the interaction between molten metal and the mould material. It has been established that corrosive, erosive and welding mechanisms are involved, and that it occurs mainly at sites where the mould material interacts strongly with the molten metal, as in the feed region and in cores. For wash out resistance, the hardness of the mould material should be high and the mould material should not easily form compounds with the molten metal. Additional desirable material properties for pressure mould steels are as follows: high yield strength good ductility good heat conductivity good hot erosion resistance small heat expansion coefficient small size, even distribution and stable structure of precipitates matrix stability small solubility of mould material alloying elements in the metal subject to pressure moulding low level of impurities and good slag purity homogeneous structure Generally, it can be said that the properties of a mould steel are determined by the composition and the method of preparation, as well as the hot working and annealing. The use of conventional maraging steels as a mould material is limited by the fact that the martensitic microstructure is not stable at temperatures above 480 °C. Above this temperature, the martensitic structure slowly begins to change into an austenitic structure. Austenite has different properties from those of martensite; the strength and thermal conductivity are lower, larger thermal expansion etc., and these deviating properties cause local tensions which accelerate the development of thermal cracks on the mould surface and thus shorten the service life of the mould. The austenisation temperature of Fe-Ni, Fe-Cr and Fe-Ni-Cr- based maraging steels is lowered particularly by nickel (about 10 °C per weight-%) and chromium, however notably less by the latter than by the former. On the other hand, nickel and chromium particularly enhance the ductility of maraging steels. The austenisation temperature of maraging steel can thus be raised by lowering the nickel content and /or by replacing part of the nickel with chromium. Simultaneously, care must be taken that the other properties of the steel remain on the appropriate level, by means of other alloying components. Disclosure of the invention A precipitate hardened mould steel of the maraging type according to claim 1, containing titanium, cobalt, chromium and nickel, has been invented having, in addition to high strength, good ductility, small thermal expansion coefficient and good thermal conductivity, a significantly better thermal stability than other maraging steels, and thus a better resistance to thermal cracking and wash out than conventional maraging steels. A maraging-type mould steel according to this invention, containing titanium, molybdenum, cobalt, chromium and nickel, is prepared by a method that allows minimal impurity content of solid elements like carbon, phosphorus, sulphur, silicon, manganese and copper, and of gaseous elements like oxygen, nitrogen and hydrogen. Preferably, vacuum induction melting (VIM) is used, complemented by vacuum re-melting (VAR). A maraging type mould steel according to the invention contains, in weight per cent, no more than 0.03, preferably no more than 0.02 % carbon; 9-18, preferably 10-14 % nickel,; 1-5, preferably 1-3 % chromium; 2-8, preferably 2-5 % molybdenum; 5-15, preferably 10 - 12 % cobalt; and 0.1-1.5, preferably 0.2-0.7 % titanium. Preferably, the ratio Ni/Ti is in the range 15-20. Preferably, a steel according to the invention additionally contains, in weight per cent, no more than 1.0, preferably no more than 0.2 % aluminium; silicon and manganese together no more than 0.20 %, preferably no more than 0.15 %; sulphur no more than 0.010%, preferably no more than 0.003 %; phosphorus no more than 0.010, preferably no more than 0.005; the residue being iron and possible impurities. Detailed description The invention is demonstrated below by means of an experimental series performed with different grades of steel. Several tests and laboratory assays have been made in order to allow a comparison of the value of the invention relative to conventional maraging steels in use today. Al and A2 represent maraging steels presently in use, and Bl, B10 and B13 represent steels according to the present invention. The compositions of the steels are shown in table 1. Table 1. Test materials Ni Cr Mo Co Ti Al 14,1 0,026 4,72 10,9 0,19 A2 19,3 0,035 4,62 7,3 0,44 Bl 9,6 4,12 1,02 9,7 0,74 BIO 12,1 3,28 2,52 10,5 1,04 B13 12,2 3,12 4,51 10,6 0,65 As the onset temperature (As) for austenite formation was determined for the above experimental steels by means of the dilatometric method, as well as the onset temperature (Ms) for martensite formation and the end temperature, the following results were obtained: Table 2. Onset temperature for reverse formation of austenite and onset and final temperatures for martensite As, 1 °C/s As, 10 °C/s Ms Mf °C °C °C °C Al 701 723 357 251 Al 644 684 189 < 80 Bl 710 730 360 230 B10 706 723 353 221 B13 705 714 285 153 As can be seen from the table, the temperature for austenite formation can be raised from the value of 644 °C for conventional maraging steel by lowering the nickel content and replacing part of the nickel with chromium. In the steel according to the application, the onset temperature for reverse austenite formation is above 700 °C measured by the dilatometric method, the rate of temperature change being 10 °C/s. For the experimental steels the following properties were determined: 1) strength properties at room temperature, and at 2) elevated temperatures, 3) precipitate behaviour as a function of time, 4) fatigue both at room temperature and at 5) elevated temperature, 6) thermal expansion coefficients, 7) thermal conductivity, 8) resistance to thermal fatigue, by means of two methods. The above mentioned mechanical and thermal properties were not determined for all the experimental grades shown in Table 1. The basic properties were determined for all, but certain tests were made e.g. only by comparison of two chemical compositions. Table 3. Tensile strength and breaking elongation at room temperature and at elevated temperature 21 °C 400 °C 600 °C R (MPa) A5(%) E (Gpa) Rm (MPa) A5(%) Rm (MPa) A5(%) Al 1669 10 194 1396 9 786 15 A2 1745 7 180 1419 6 786 19 Bl 1532 10 195 1195 9 784 14 BIO 1799 8 194 1436 10 775 17 B13 1962 7 197 1541 10 811 17 Table 4. Change in hardness at precipitation temperature 530 °C/525 °C against time. Hardness, Vickers HN10 6 hours 9 hours 15 hours Al/525 °C 543 537 525 B 10/530 °C 568 570 558 B13/530 °C 603 600 581 Table 5. Tensile strengths, service life at ± 900 MPa load and mean fatigue resistance related to tensile strength for test steels (comparative test) Rm (Mpa) Service life ±900 Mpa Relative service life No. of cycles No. of cycles B10 1799 23749 11875 B13 1962 43510 20015 Table 6. Fatigue resistance at 400°C (comparative test) ± 550 Mpa ± 750 MPa No. of cycles Al 729041 28515 B13 757450 50477 Table 7. Thermal expansion coefficients of test steels Thermal expansion Temperature range coefficient °C 10 "6 /°C .1 10,8 20 - 600 10 11,9 20 - 710 13 11,3 20 - 710 Table 8. Thermal conductivity of test steels °C Thermal conductivity W/cmK° Al B10 B13 23 25,5 17,0 17,8 100 26,9 19,1 20,4 200 28,2 22,0 22,3 300 30,0 24,1 24,7 400 31,6 25,2 26,2 500 33,2 28,1 29,0 600 33,5 23,8 26,8 650 21,7 23,3 The resistance to thermal fatigue was measured for the test steels using two different methods, the so-called Dunk wetting test and an inductive method. In the wetting test, the test rods were of the size 12.7 x 12.7 x 152 mm, and a threaded hole was machined at one end for fixation. Prior to the test, the rods were kept in an oven at 371 °C for 1 hour. Thus, on the rod surface was formed an oxide layer, whose purpose was to reduce the sticking of aluminium to the rod surfaces during testing. During the test cycle, the piece was submerged into molten aluminium and held there for 3.5 seconds. After 15 000 cycles, the holding time was extended to 7 seconds. After the aluminium wetting, the piece was transferred to a mixture of water and pressure mould lubricant (LaFrance Franlube 3600) and held for 10 seconds. Before the next wetting, the piece was allowed to dry for about 5 seconds. A384 grade aluminium was used in the test. With intervals of 5000 wetting cycles, hardness and crack count were determined. For crack count, two opposite sides of the test piece were ground with 240 and 600 grid abrasive paper, and evaluated with a stereo microscope (magnification 90 x) at four edges, on 35 mm regions located 35 mm from the lower end of the test piece. 25 000 wetting cycles were carried out on each test piece. Table 9. Results of Dunk wetting tests No. of cycles / Hardness HRC No. of cracks after 25000 cycles 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 Al 49 49 49 42 42 617 B10 52 52 52 46 44 20 B13 54 54 54 48 47 75 The thermal fatigue tests using an induction heating device were carried out as follows: The test piece was a ø 20 x 40 mm cylinder provided with a ø 4 mm axial bore. The piece was heated using an induction coil to a temperature of 600 °C, whereupon it was cooled to room temperature using a water jet. The heating time during the test was 6 seconds, and cooling time 13 seconds. The test pieces were inspected after 10, 100, 500, 1000, 2500, 5000 and 10 000 cycles by making surface replicas and photographing these with a light microscope using a digital method. In addition, electron micrographs of the test pieces were made after 10 000 cycles. Table 10. Results of thermal fatigue resistance tests by inductive method No. of cycles Al B13 Microscopic observations 0-1000 no cracking no cracking 2500 no cracking no cracking 5000 initial cracking no cracking 10000 cracking some cracking The tests show, that the resistance to thermal fatigue is significantly higher in a steel according to the invention than in conventional maraging steels, and that this is due to the better thermal stability of the steel according to the invention at temperatures required for casting of light metals (Zn, Mg, Al). By carefully balancing the composition, also other properties influencing the service life of a pressure mould have been kept at a good level. It is important to keep the nickel/titanium rate small enough, that is below 20. Thus, titanium binds nickel into stable compounds between the metals, the matrix nickel content stays low enough, and the austenite reversion temperature is high enough. The manufacture of a maraging-type mould steel according to the invention may comprise at least the following stages: in a first stage, the starting materials are molten in an induction oven and cast in a vacuum, in a second stage, the cast billet is remelted in vacuum to homogenise the structure and further eliminate impurities, In a third stage, the remelted billet is hot worked using a reduction ratio of at least 1 :3, and the worked billet is annealed. As follows from the disclosure of prior art, a preferable field of use for the steel according to the invention is as a mould material for pressure casting of light metal alloys. In addition it may well be used for, e.g. making injection moulds for plastic items.

Claims: Claims 1. Precipitation hardening maraging type steel, characterised by the preparation thereof comprising at least the following stages: melting in a vacuum induction oven and casting in vacuum, remelting of the cast billet for structural homogenisation and elimination of impurities hot working of the remelted billet with a reduction ratio of at least 1 :3 and annealing of the worked billet; in which steel the onset temperature for reverse austenite formation is over 700 °C measured by the dilatometric method with a temperature rise rate of 10 °C/s, and the composition in weight per cent: Ni 9 - 18 preferably 10 - 14 Cr 1 - 5 1 - 3 Mo 1 - 8 2 - 5 Co 5 - 15 10 - 12 Ti 0.1 - 1.5 0.2 - 0.7 Al Max. 1 max. 0.2 C max. 0.03 max. 0.02 the balance being iron and residual impurities. 2. Steel according to claim 1, characterised by its combined content of silicon and magnesium being no more than 0.2 per cent by weight, preferably no more than 0.15 per cent by weight. 3. Steel according to claim 1 or 2, characterised by its content of sulphur being no more than 0.010 per cent by weight, preferably no more than 0.003 per cent by weight. 4. Steel according to any claim 1 - 3, characterised by its content of phosphorus being no more than 0.010 per cent by weight, preferably no more than 0.005 per cent by weight. 5. Steel according to any claim 1 - 4, characterised by the ratio of nickel content to titanium content in weight per cent being less than 25, preferably less than 20. 6. The use of a steel according to any claim 1-5 as a material for moulds for light metal alloy pressure casting

Inventors: KUMPULA MIKKO, KUMPULA, MIKKO
Applicants: KUMPULA MIKKO, RAUMA MATERIALS TECH OY, KUMPULA, MIKKO, RAUMA MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY OY
Application year: 1999
Main classification: C22C38
IPC codes: C21D8, C22C38