WETTABLE MICROCAPSULES HAVING HYDROPHOBIC POLYMER COATED CORES

Abstract: This invention concerns wettable microcapsules having hydrophobic polymer coated cores and to processes for their preparation; in particular, to microcapsules with hydrophobic polymer coats that are wettable so that they are suspendible in aqueous medium. The wettable microcapsules can be prepared by applying hydrophobic polymer onto a drug containing core by phase separation from a solvent to provide microcapsules, optionally washing said microcapsules with a solvent in which said microcapsules are substantially insoluble and drying, characterised in that: (a) one or more surfactants is/are incorporated in the solvent at the phase separation step; and/or (b) one or more surfactants is/are incorporated in the solvent used to wash the microcapsules; and/or (c) the microcapsule is coated with one or more surfactants optionally in the presence of a binder.

Description: WETTABLE MICROCAPSULES HAVING HYDROPHOBIC POLYMER COATED CORES The present invention relates to wettable microcapsules having hydrophobic polymer coated cores and to processes for their preparation; in particular, to microcapsules with hydrophobic polymer coats that are wettable so that they suspendible in aqueous medium. The microcapsules produced by this invention are suitable to be manufactured into oral pharmaceutical dosage forms such as capsules, tablets, monodose sachets, syrups. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Microencapsulation by phase separation is extensively used in the preparation of multiparticulate dosage forms. The process involves enveloping small particles of the material to be delivered (typically a drug), which may be a liquid or a solid, to produce minute discrete packages called microcapsules. They comprise cores coated with an external polymeric membrane. To the naked eye microcapsules appear as a fine powder. Their dimensions typically range between few microns and thousands of microns. Phase separation processes exploit the physico-chemical properties of a polymeric coating material which allows separation of the polymeric material from solutions in a liquid state instead of precipitating the material as a solid. The material to be coated must be insoluble in the liquid vehicle used and be compatible with the coating polymer. The material to be coated, e.g. a drug, may already be coated with an insoluble coat before it is further coated by phase separation. The separation (or coacervation) phenomenon can be induced by a number of means such as by variation of temperature and/or pH, by adding a salt or non-solvent or incompatible polymers, or by polymer- polymer interaction. Microencapsulation systems are also described in US 3,415,758 and US 3,748,277. The choice of both coating polymer and microencapsulation system depends on the physico-chemical characteristics of the material to be coated and the intended purpose (therapeutic use) of the microcapsules. Microcapsules having an outer coat of polymer with hydrophobic properties, such as for example ethyl cellulose, are extensively used as, for example, sustained release or delayed release dosage forms or taste masked dosage forms etc. Such materials may also be used for the separation of incompatible drugs. -2- The hydrophobic nature of such coating materials gives rise to several drawbacks when the microcapsules are to be used in aqueous environment. For example, when the finished dosage form is placed into a glass of water the hydrophobic microcapsules tend to float and form aggregates (e.g. clumps or clusters) and some tend to attach to the glass wall. The floating effect also occurs for those microcapsules having a real density greater than the liquid medium. Accordingly, for dosage forms which are to be suspended there are problems of accuracy of dosing and problems of patient acceptability due to for example difficulty with swallowing. Aggregation and water repellence also occur in physiological fluids following the intake of dosage form containing hydrophobic microcapsules. This aggregation of the microcapsules, not only decreases the dissolution profile of the active due to a lowering of the total surface area, but also can be responsible for local irritation occurring in the gastrointestinal mucosa. Such phenomena severely prejudice both patient acceptability and therapeutic efficiency of such micro-encapsulated drugs. US Patent 4,259,315 attempted to solve the above-mentioned drawbacks by admixing surfactants with hydrophobic microcapsules obtained by phase-separation. This system, requiring an additional mixing step is time consuming and has drawbacks with achieving uniformity of the mixture. There is a need therefore for microcapsules which are wettable and which preferably do not aggregate or suffer from any one or more of the drawbacks discussed above. There is also a need for microcapsules prepared using hydrophobic polymer which are readily dispersible in water. The present invention provides a wettable microcapsule comprising a drug encapsulated with a layer of a hydrophobic polymer said polymer containing and/or having deposited thereon one or more surfactants in sufficient concentration to provide the microcapsule with hydrophilic properties/characteristics In a preferred embodiment this invention provides a wettable microcapsule comprising a drug encapsulated by an inner layer of hydrophobic polymer and an outer layer comprising one or more surfactants and optionally a binder the amount of surfactant being sufficient to provide the microcapsule with hydrophilic properties. -3- The present invention further provides wettable microcapsules obtainable by any one of the processes described herein. The present invention also provides a process for encapsulating a drug containing core with a hydrophobic polymer comprising applying said polymer onto the core by phase separation from a solvent to provide a microcapsule, optionally washing said microcapsule with a further solvent in which said microcapsule is substantially insoluble and drying said microcapsule, characterised in that: (a) one or more surfactants is/are incorporated in the solvent at the phase separation step; and/or (b) one or more surfactants is/are incorporated in the solvent used to wash the microcapsule; and/or (c) the microcapsule is coated with one or more surfactants optionally in the presence of a binder. In a further aspect this invention provides a process for preparing a microcapsule formulation, which comprises (a) mixing a microcapsule having an outer layer of hydrophobic polymer and a solvent containing one or more surfactants dissolved therein, in which the hydrophobic polymer is substantially insoluble; and (b) drying said microcapsule. The concentration of surfactant(s) used in the solvent should be sufficient to provide the microcapsule with hydrophilic characteristics. In one embodiment the surfactant(s) is/are added to the coacervation system (i.e. to the solvent) before phase separation takes place. In this way the surfactant can be absorbed directly onto the membrane. In another more preferred second embodiment the process involves a wetting treatment in situ of the hydrophobic membrane of the microcapsules after phase separation has taken place to provide microcapsules which do not display hydrophobic properties. In both embodiments there is no need for an additional step to be added to conventional methods of preparing micro-capsules, instead existing steps are used. The post-treatment wetting step involved in the second embodiment described above can be carried out by washing the microcapsules in situ with at least one surfactant dissolved in a suitable solvent in which the hydrophobic polymer forming the outer membrane of the microcapsule is insoluble. Alternatively the washing can be carried out by treating the filtered microcapsules eg by percolation of the wetting solution directly through the filter cake. The wetted microcapsules may be dried, eg by evaporation or -4- using a current of warm air, to facilitate the surfactant adhering to, and/or absorbing onto, the outer hydrophobic layer. In yet a further embodiment the wettability of the hydrophobic membrane of the microcapsules is achieved by coating the microcapsules (optionally treated with surfactant during coacervation step and/or washing step as described above) with a surfactant layer, and optionally a binder. The surfactant layer is conveniently applied by spray coating the microcapsules in a fluid bed with at least one surfactant dissolved in a suitable solvent in which the hydrophobic polymer forming the outer membrane of the microcapsule is insoluble, and drying. The wetting solution composition comprises at least one surfactant and optionally a binder. The solvent may be aqueous or organic. The hydrophobic polymer membrane should be insoluble in the wetting solution solvent. A non limiting list of suitable binders includes gelatine, polyethyleneglycol, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, methylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidones, pre-gelatinised starch, ethylcellulose, alginates, carboxymethylcellulose, arabic gum, tragacanth gum etc. When ethylcellulose is used as the hydrophobic polymer of the microcapsules, the wetting solution preferably comprises sodium docusate (DOSS) as surfactant and polyvinylpyrrolidine (PVP) as binder, both dissolved in purified water as solvent. Advantageously the weight ratio of surfactant (eg DOSS) to binder (eg PVP) is preferably in the range of 5: 1 to 1:5, more preferably from 3: 1 to 1:3. The wetting solution concentration (% w/w) of surfactant and binder (eg DOSS + PVP) may vary from 0.1 to 10.0, advantageously from 2.0 to 6.0. To ensure the water wettability of the ethylcellulose microcapsules, the quantity of dry surfactant (eg DOSS), expressed as % w/w over the hydrophobic cores, ranges from 0.010 to 2.000, more preferably from 0.040 to 1.000. However it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that these limits may vary depending on the particle size distribution of the microcapsules. The wettability of a solid is strictly related to its solid surface tension and that of the surrounding liquid. Solids will not be wetted if their critical suface tension is exceeded by the surface tension of the liquid. The wetting properties of a liquid medium are quantified through the determination of the contact angle (') which is the angle between a liquid droplet and the surface over which it spreads and represents the grade of extension of a liquid on a solid surface. -5- The contact angle may vary from 0° signifying complete wetting, or may approach 180° at which wetting is insignificant. A primary function of the surfactants is to act as wetting agents because of their tendency to be adsorbed at the solid-liquid interfaces while reducing also the surface tension of the liquids. As a result the contact angle between the surface and the wetting liquid decreases. The phase separation process can be carried out according to the known processes whereby the material to be coated is dispersed in a solvent in which the polymeric coating is dissolved. Organic coacervation processes are particularly suitable for use in the present invention. These are widely described, e.g. in US patents 4,315,758 and US 3,748,277. In a preferred embodiment the present invention provides a process for preparing a wettable microcapsule which comprises: (a) forming a biphasic system having a liquid phase comprising a hydrophobic polymer solution and a solid phase comprising the core to be coated; (b) depositing the hydrophobic polymer on to the core in the liquid phase by coacervation ; (c) hardening the polymer coating membrane; (d) separating the microcapsule from the liquid phase; (e) washing the microcapsule with a liquid in which the coating membrane is substantially insoluble and separating the microcapsule from the liquid; (f) treating the microcapsule with at least one surfactant dissolved in a liquid vehicle in which the coating polymer is substantially insoluble; and (g) drying. The dissolution of the coating material in the solvent may be achieved e.g. by increasing the temperature and agitating the mixture constantly. Coacervation may be induced, e.g. by lowering the temperature, by adding a non-solvent or by adding a polymeric phase inducer which shows a higher affinity for the liquid vehicle (i.e. by salting out). If a phase inducer is used one or more washing phases are preferred in order to eliminate the phase inducer. The liquid vehicle may suitably be the same for phases (a), (e) and (f), or they may be different. Step (e) may be repeated. In step (e) or, if step (e) is repeated, then in either or both of steps (e), at least one surfactant may be present in the liquid used to wash the microcapsules. -6- The above described method refers to a preferred embodiment. As an alternative the wetting phase may occur after the microcapsules have been dried (e.g. by re- suspending the microcapsules in the wetting solution). In a further embodiment, the wetting or hydrophilisation phase may also occur before the washing step (e) by dissolving the surfactant directly in the liquid vehicle after the membrane has formed [step (c)]. In an alternative preferred embodiment the microcapsule, such as obtained after steps (a) to (e) above, is spray coated in a fluid bed with a solution of surfactant and optionally a binder followed by drying. If desired the spray coating with surfactant solution can also be carried out after steps (a) to (g) above The above described wetting method is fully integratable into known microencapsulation procedures. The presence of the surfactant dissolved in the washing liquid [step (f)], allows, besides the removal of the phase inducer, also the contemporaneous hydrophilisation of the membrane which constitutes the wall of the microcapsules. The novel wetting system in. situ does not prolong the total manufacturing time. The microcapsules produced according to the present invention are readily suspendible in an aqueous environment without giving rise to significant aggregation and water repellence. Furthermore the formulations prepared allow precise dosage of the drug and so allow adsorption of the drug along the gastrointestinal tract to be more homogeneous. Hydrophobic polymers, solvents and complementary phase separation inducers which may be utilised in the present invention, either individually or in combination, are discussed below. These are given by way of example only and are not to be considered exhaustive. Hydrophobic polymers which may be used in the encapsulation process include vinyl acetate, vinyl chloride, vinyl carbonate, polymethylmethacrylates, ethyl cellulose, nitrocellulose, vinylidene chloride-acrylonitrile copolymer, acrylonitrile-styrene copolymer, polyethylene, polyethylene oxide, polystyrene, ethylene vinyl acetate, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate phthalate, cellulose acetate butyrate, hydroxypropyl- methylcellulose phthalate. Ethyl cellulose and cellulose acetate phthalate are preferred. -7- Complementary polymer inducers include polyethylene, polybutadiene, polydimethyl-siloxane, copolymers of isobutylene and isoprene methacrylic polymers, paraffin waxes, hexane. Polyethylene and paraffin wax are preferred. Solvents which may be used for the phase separation include methylethylketone, isobutylmethylketone, acetone, tetrahydrofuran, 1,4-dioxane, ethyl acetate, butyl acetate, cyclohexane, normal-hexane, toluene, toluene-ethanol, benzene. Cyclohexane is preferred. Surfactants which may be used in the present invention include amphiphilic, cationic, anionic and non ionic surfactants (following the classification provided by Schwartz and Perry in "Surface Active Ingredients, Interscience, New York 1949"). The surfactant/s selected should be soluble in the solvent in which the hydrophobic polymer is insoluble. Preferably the surfactant should have a high affinity for the hydrophobic polymer. Particularly preferred embodiments of the invention involve the use of cyclohexane as solvent, ethylcellulose as hydrophobic polymer, and at least one of sodium docusate, sorbitan laurate and sorbitan oleate as surfactant. Phase separation of ethylcellulose from cyclohexane using polyethylene or paraffin waxes as phase inducer are known methods of microencapsulation which may be used to encapsulate active principles which are insoluble in cyclohexane. Ethylcellulose/cyclohexane systems are particularly suitable because they employ a single solvent and a phase inducer. Polyethylene is a useful phase inducer as it precipitates out of the liquid medium the membrane has formed around the core. The general procedure for the preparation of ethylcellulose microcapsules by phase separation from cyclohexane with any phase inducer polymer is essentially as follows: (1) disperse the ethylcellulose, the active to be coated, and the phase inducing polymer in cyclohexane at room temperature, (2) heat the mixture, while stirring at about 78-81°C, (3) cool the system to room temperature to allow the ethyl cellulose coating layer to form and to harden, (4) stop agitation and decant microcapsules , -8- (5) remove the cyclohexane and wash the microcapsules with fresh cyclohexane to eliminate the phase inducer polymer from the product, (6) filter the microcapsules and dry. The wetting treatment is conveniently carried out once the ethylcellulose has been deposited on the core, by washing the microcapsules with at least one surfactant dissolved in a solvent in which the membrane is insoluble. Preferably surfactants which are soluble in cyclohexane are used. The post wetting treatment may conveniently be carried out at a temperature below the solubilising temperature of ethylcellulose in such solvent e.g less than about (77-78°C) and preferably at room temperature. Alternatively a surfactant layer is applied in a separate after-step by spray coating with a solution of the surfactant and drying. A non limiting list of surfactants which are soluble in cyclohexane at room temperature is sorbitan monolaurate (e.g Span 20), sorbitan monooleate (e.g Span 80), sorbitan trioleate (e.g Span 85), mono and diglycerides of fatty acids (e.g Arlacel 186) and sodium docusate. Preferably the wetting treatment is carried out after the removal of the amount of cyclohexane used to dissolve ethyl cellulose and later to provide temperature-dependent gelation of the membrane. A solution of a surfactant (e.g. sodium docusate in cyclohexane) may be added to the ethylcellulose microcapsules remaining in the reactor. Agitation is required to achieve a chemical equilibrium between the two phases of the system (hydrophobic membrane / surfactant(s) solution). Agitation time required will depend on the affinity of the surfactant for the hydrophobic polymer. Once chemical equilibrium is reached further stirring will not provide any improvement in the wettability grade of the microcapsules in an aqueous medium. The process is preferably concluded by filtering and drying the wettable microcapsules. The degree of absorption of the surfactant on the surface of the microcapsules is related to the total surface area of the microcapsules and to the partition of surfactant between the liquid vehicle and the hydrophobic membrane. The amount of surfactant on the surface of the microcapsule should be sufficient to achieve the desired result and is dependent on both particle size distribution of the microcapsules and their relative amount in the reactor. An increase in the total surface -9- area will require an increase in surfactant concentration in order to achieve a sufficient degree of wettability for the microcapsules. When a biphasic system of sodium docusate in cyclohexane and microcapsules of ethylcellulose is utilised the ratio of surfactant dissolved in the solvent and the total surface area of the microcapsules will range, e.g. from about O. lmg/cm^ to about lOmg/cm^. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that these limits may vary significantly in function of the types of surfactant, liquid vehicle and polymeric coating membrane used. Since as the wettability grade of a solid in water is numerically quantified by the determination of the contact angle, a specific method was developed to compare the wettability behaviour of the treated microcapsules vs. the untreated ones. The decrease of the contact angle for wettable microcapsules was found to be inversely proportional to the concentration of the surfactant in the liquid vehicle used, at constant total surface area. Adsorption of the surfactant on the surface of the microcapsules caused an increase of the in vitro dissolution profiles due to the increased wettability of the membrane. Such phenomenon is beneficial for in vivo bioavailability. Direct application of the surfactant (optionally with binder) to the surface of the microcapsule by spraying over a fluid bed provides more predictable results since the quantity of surfactant applied can be pre-determined and if required accurately measured, eg by weight increase. The following examples are used to illustrate the invention and they are not to be construed as limiting. COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE Cyclohexane (lOOOg) at room temperature was poured into a stainless steel tank having a 2 litres capacity and equipped with a stirring means. To this was added a mixture also at room temperature of theophylline granules (200g), ethylcellulose (7g) and polyethylene (20g) . While stirring, the temperature was increased up the boiling point of cyclohexane (circa 80°C) and then the system was allowed to cool to room temperature. Once the -10- phase separation had terminated, stirring was stopped and the microcapsules were allowed to settle. Thereafter the liquid vehicle was decanted off. The hardened microcapsules were then washed at room temperature with 500g of cyclohexane whilst stirring and then the liquid vehicle was removed according to the procedure described above. The washing operation was repeated with the same amount of cyclohexane at room temperature and then the microcapsules were filtered and dried. EXAMPLE 1 The method described in the comparative example above was repeated using the same components and quantities until the first washing phase was terminated. The cyclohexane was removed and the microcapsules again washed, while stirring, with 500 g of a sodium docusate solution in cyclohexane (0.8% w/w). The microcapsules were than filtered and dried. The post wetting washing phase was performed at room temperature. EXAMPLE 2 The method described in the Example 1 was repeated by washing the microcapsules with a sodium docusate solution in cyclohexane (2.0% w/w) at room temperature with stirring. EXAMPLE 3 Cyclohexane (lOOOg) at room temperature was poured into a stainless steel tank having a 2 litres capacity and equipped with a stirring means. To this was added a mixture also at room temperature of theophylline granules (200g), ethylcellulose (7g), polyethylene (20g) and sodium docusate (8g). While stirring, the temperature was increased up the boiling point of cyclohexane (circa 80°C) and then the system was allowed to cool to room temperature. Once the phase separation had terminated, stirring was stopped and the microcapsules were allowed to settle. Thereafter the liquid vehicle was decanted off. The hardened microcapsules were then washed at room temperature with 500g of cyclohexane whilst stirring and then the liquid vehicle was removed according to the procedure described above. The washing operation was repeated with the same amount of cyclohexane at room temperature and then the microcapsules were filtered and dried. -11- EXAMPLE 4 The method described in the comparative example 1 was repeated using the same components and quantities until the liquid vehicle was decanted off. The hardened microcapsules were then washed at room temperature with 500g of cyclohexane whilst stirring and then the microcapsules were filtered. A wetting solution consisting of 500g of a sodium docusate solution in cyclohexane (0.8% w/w) was successively percolated through the filter cake. Finally the microcapsules were dried. EXAMPLE 5 800g of dried theophylline microcapsules obtained according to the Comparative Example 1 were charged into a fluid bed (Glatt® GCPG 1) equipped with a top spray insert and sprayed with 40g of a wetting solution having the following composition (% w/w): 95.0 purified water 3.5 polyvinylpyrrolidone 1.5 sodium docusate Finally the surfactant coated microcapsules were dried. EXAMPLE 6 Microcapsules of the abovementioned Examples were tested according to the procedures given below : - (1). Dissolution profiles were performed with the USP Dissolution Apparatus II Paddle according to the following method: 500 ml, pH 1.2, 100 rpm, 37°C, spectrophotometric determination. The results were the average of six replications. (2). The contact angle measurements in water were performed with a wettability tester (Lorenz & Wettre). The sample was prepared by compacting lg of microcapsules at 5000 kg/cm^ through an hydraulic press SPECAC having a cavity with an internal diameter of 2 cm. The results derive from the average of 15 single determinations on both the sides of the tablet. (3). The visual observations of the wettability behaviour of the microcapsules were performed by putting 500 mg of product into a beaker with 50 ml of water. The results are reported in TABLE I below: ■ 12- TABLE I: Effect of the wetting treatment on theophylline granules microencapsulated with ethyl cellulose. Sample In vitro dissolution (%) Contact Visual observations angle lh 2h 4h 6h 8h (%) Comparative 14.3 28.3 54.9 78.5 93.3 79.0 ± 1.8 Wettability: absent Example Floating of the microcapsules Example 1 18.8 36.4 68.3 91.6 100.0 54.8 ± 2.6 Wettability: good Sedimentation of the microcapsules Example 2 17.5 34.2 65.4 89.8 100.0 38.1 ± 3.3 Wettability: good Sedimentation of the microcapsules Example 3 19.8 38.5 73.4 95.5 101.2 70.0 ± 2.3 Wettability : fairly good Sedimentation of the microcapsules Example 4 15.0 64.0 102.8 60.2 ± 2.1 Wettability: good Sedimentation of the microcapsules Example 5 14.7 63.5 100.3 18.6 + 1.8 Wettability: excellent Sedimentation of the microcapsules

Claims: -13- CLAIMS 1. A wettable microcapsule comprising a drug encapsulated by a hydrophobic polymer; said polymer containing and/or having deposited thereon one or more surfactants and optionally a binder in sufficient concentration to confer hydrophilic properties to the microcapsule. 2. A wettable microcapsule comprising a drug encapsulated by an inner layer of hydrophobic polymer and an outer layer comprising one or more surfactants and optionally a binder, the amount of surfactant being sufficient to provide the microcapsule with hydrophilic properties. 3. A wettable microcapsule according to claim 1 or claim 2 in which the hydrophobic polymer is selected from vinyl acetate, vinyl chloride, vinyl carbonate, polymethylmethacrylates, ethylcellulose, nitrocellulose, vinylidene chloride-acrylonitrile copolymer, acrylonitrile-styrene copolymer, polyethylene, polyethylene oxide, polystyrene, ethylene vinyl acetate, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate phthalate, cellulose acetate butyrate, hydroxypropyl-methylcellulose phthalate. 4. A wettable microcapsule according to claim 1 or claim 2 in which the hydrophobic polymer is ethyl cellulose or cellulose acetate phthalate. 5. A wettable microcapsule according to any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the surfactant is selected sodium docusate, sorbitan laurate or sorbitan oleate. 6. A wettable microcapsule according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the binder is polyvinylpyrrolidone . 7. A wettable microcapsule formulation obtainable by a process which comprises spray coating a microcapsule in the form of a drug particle encapsulated in a -14- hydrophobic polymer with a surfactant solution optionally containing binder and drying to give an outer layer of surfactant sufficient to provide hydrophilic properties. 8. A process for preparing a wettable microcapsule which comprises encapsulating a drug core with a layer of hydrophobic polymer to provide a microcapsule, spray coating the microcapsule in a fluid bed with a surfactant solution optionally containing a binder and drying to form an outer layer of surfactant sufficient to provide hydrophilic properties. 9. A process according to Claim 8 in which the microcapsule having an outer layer of hydrophobic polymer is prepared by a process comprising: (a) forming a biphasic system having a liquid phase comprising a hydrophobic polymer solution and a solid phase comprising the core to be coated; (b) depositing the hydrophobic polymer on the core in the liquid phase by coacervation ; (c) hardening the polymer coating membrane; and (d) separating the microcapsule from the liquid phase. 10. A process for encapsulating a drug core with a hydrophobic polymer comprising applying the polymer onto the core by phase separation from a solvent to provide a microcapsule, optionally washing said microcapsule with a solvent in which said microcapsule is substantially insoluble and drying said microcapsule, characterised in that one or more of the following steps is /are performed: (a) one or more surfactants is/are incorporated in the solvent during phase separation; (b) one or more surfactants is/are incorporated in the solvent used to wash the microcapsule; and/or (c) the dried microcapsule is spray coated with one or more surfactants optionally in the presence of a binder. 11 A process according to any one of Claims 8 to 10 the weight ratio of surfactant (eg DOSS) to binder (eg PVP) in the spray coating is in the range of 5: 1 to 1:5, more preferably from 3:1 to 1:3. -15- 12. A process according to any one of Claims 8 to 11 in which the concentration (% w/w) of surfactant and binder (eg DOSS + PVP) in the spray coating solution is in the range from 0.1 to 10.0, advantageously from 2.0 to 6.0. 13. A process for preparing a wettable microcapsule formulation, which comprises (a) bringing a microcapsule having an outer layer of hydrophobic polymer into contact with a solution containing one or more surfactants dissolved in a solvent in which the hydrophobic polymer is substantially insoluble; and (b) drying said microcapsule. 14. A process for preparing a wettable microcapsule which process comprises: (a) forming a biphasic system having a liquid phase comprising a hydrophobic polymer solution and a solid phase comprising the core to be coated; (b) depositing the hydrophobic polymer on each core in the liquid phase by coacervation ; (c) hardening the polymer coating membrane; (d) separating the microcapsules from the liquid phase; (e) washing the microcapsules with a liquid in which the coating membrane is substantially insoluble and separating the microcapsules from the liquid; (f) treating the microcapsules with at least one surfactant dissolved in a liquid vehicle in which the coating polymer is substantially insoluble; and (g) isolating the surfactant treated microcapsules and drying. 15. A process according to Claim 14 wherein step (e) is repeated. 16. A process according to Claim 14 or Claim 15 wherein the liquid used to wash the microcapsules in step (e) or both of steps (e) contain/s at least one surfactant dissolved therein. 17. A process as claimed in any one of the Claims 14 to 16 in which the concentration of surfactant in the solvent or liquid is about 0.1 to 8% by weight, preferably 0.4 to 4% by weight 18. A process as claimed in any one of the Claims 8 to 17 in which the liquid vehicle comprises cyclohexane. -16- 19. A process as claimed in any one of Claims 8 to 18 in which the concentration of said surfactant(s) is sufficient to provide the microcapsule with hydrophilic characteristics. 20 A wettable microcapsule obtainable by a process as claimed in any one of claims 8 to 19. 21. A product or process as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein the surfactant(s) is/are selected from sodium docusate and sorbitan esters of fatty acids such as sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan monolaurate or sorbitan trioleate. 22. A product or process as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims in which the hydrophobic polymer comprises ethyl cellulose.

Inventors: CALANCHI MASSIMO MARIA, DE LUIGI BRUSCHI STEFANO, GENTILINI LEONARDO, MAPELLI LUIGI GIOVANNI, CALANCHI, MASSIMO, MARIA, DE LUIGI BRUSCHI, STEFANO, GENTILINI, LEONARDO, MAPELLI, LUIGI, GIOVANNI
Applicants: CALANCHI MASSIMO MARIA, EURAND INT, GENTILINI LEONARDO, LUIGI BRUSCHI STEFANO DE, MAPELLI LUIGI GIOVANNI, CALANCHI, MASSIMO, MARIA, DE LUIGI BRUSCHI, STEFANO, EURAND INTERNATIONAL S.P.A., GENTILINI, LEONARDO, MAPELLI, LUIGI, GIOVANNI
Application year: 1999
Main classification: A61K9
IPC codes: A61J3, A61K9, A61K47