PLANT CONTROL GENES

Abstract: The invention provides nucleic acid isolates comprising nucleotide sequences encoding polypeptides having GI function, or which are complementary to such sequences. Constructs containing such nucleic acids are useful in transforming plants to control flowering and/or starch accumulation in the transformed plant.

Description: PLANT CONTROL GENES This invention relates to the genetic control of certain processes in plants and the cloning and expression of genes involved therein. More particularly, the invention relates to the cloning and expression of the GIGANTEA (GI) gene of Arabidopsis thάliana, to GI homologues from other species, and to manipulation and use of these GI genes in plants to control flowering and to direct starch accumulation in certain tissues. BACKGROUND Efficient flowering in plants is important, particularly when the intended product is the flower or the seed produced therefrom. One aspect of this is the timing of flowering: advancing or retarding the onset of flowering can be useful to farmers and seed producers. An understanding of the genetic mechanisms which influence flowering therefore provides a means for altering the flowering characteristics of the target plant. Species for which flowering is important to crop production are numerous - essentially all crops which are grown from seed, with important examples being the cereals, rice and maize being probably the most agronomicaUy important in warmer climatic zones, and wheat, barley, oats and rye in more temperate climates. Other important seed products are oil seed rape and canola, sugar beet, maize, sunflower, soyabean and sorghum. Many crops which are harvested for their roots are, of course, grown annually from seed and the production of seed of any kind is very dependent upon the ability of the plant to flower, to be pollinated and to set seed. In horticulture, control of the timing of flowering is important. Horticultural plants whose flowering may be controlled include lettuce, endive and vegetable brassicas including cabbage, broccoli and cauliflower, and carnations and geraniums. The so-called GIGANTEA or GI gene of Arabidopsis thaliana has been implicated in the response of that plant to photoperiod. However, the GI gene has not been conclusively identified or isolated to date, and its sequence has not been determined. Conclusive identification, isolation and sequencing of the GI gene would therefore be desirable to allow manipulation of the flowering process. In addition to being able to manipulate flowering time, an ability to control starch accumulation in plants would also be useful. Starch is synthesised by all higher plants and accumulates to high levels in most plants. Starch plays a crucial role in plant metabolism. It is synthesised in chloroplasts during photosynthesis and then degraded to supply energy for metabolism during the subsequent dark period. This causes fluctuations in starch levels, with the highest starch levels occurring at the end of the light period. GI mutations cause starch to accumulate in the leaves. GI starch accumulation follows wild type fluctuations, but has been shown to be two to three times higher than wild type plants. This accumulation is restricted to photosynthetically active tissues (Eimert et al. 1995). Again, identification, isolation and sequencing of the GT gene would be desirable to allow manipulation of the starch accumulation process. It is therefore the object of this invention to go some distance towards meeting the above desiderata, or at least to provide the public with a useful choice. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The invention has a number of aspects, and specifically contemplates the following: a nucleic acid isolate comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide with GI function; nucleic acid as described above wherein said nucleotide sequence is that of the GI gene of Arabidopsis thatiana or a GI homologue from another plant species, or a mutant, derivative or allele of the gene or homologue; nucleic acid as described above wherein said GI nucleotide sequence includes the nucleotides shown in Figure 4 A or 4B; nucleic acid as described above which comprises or includes the nucleotide sequence shown in Figure 5, Figure 8 or Figure 11; nucleic acid as described above which encodes the all or part of the amino acid sequence of Figure 6, Figure 9 or Figure 12; nucleic acid as described above wherein expression of said nucleotide sequence delays flowering in a transgenic plant; nucleic acid as described above wherein expression of said nucleotide sequence promotes flowering in a transgenic plant; nucleic acid as described above wherein expression of said nucleotide sequence promotes starch accumulation in the photosynthetically active tissues of a transgenic plant; a nucleic acid isolate comprising a nucleotide sequence complementary to a coding sequence as described above or a fragment of a said coding sequence; nucleic acid as described above further comprising a regulatory sequence for sense transcription of said polypeptide; nucleic acid which is DNA as described above wherein said nucleotide sequence or a fragment thereof is under control of a regulatory sequence for anti-sense transcription of said nucleotide sequence or a fragment thereof; a nucleic acid vector suitable for transformation of a plant cell and comprising nucleic acid as described above; a plant cell comprising nucleic acid as described above; a plant comprising plant cells as described above; selfed or hybrid progeny or a descendant of a plant as described above, or any part or propagule of such a plant, progeny or descendant, such as seed; a method of influencing a flowering characteristic of a plant, the method comprising causing or allowing expression of the polypeptide encoded by nucleic acid as described above within cells of the plant; a method of influencing a flowering characteristic of a plant, the method comprising causing or allowing transcription from nucleic acid as described above within cells of the plant; a method of influencing a flowering characteristic of a plant, the method comprising causing or allowing anti- sense transcription from nucleic acid as described above within cells of the plant; a method of promoting starch accumulation in the photosynthetically-active tissues of a transgenic plant, the method comprising causing or allowing expression of the polypeptide encoded by nucleic acid as described above within the plant; a method of promoting starch accumulation in the photosynthetically-active tissues of a transgenic plant, the method comprising causing or allowing transcription from nucleic acid as described above within the plant; a method of promoting starch accumulation in the photosynthetically-active tissues of a transgenic plant, the method comprising causing or allowing anti-sense transcription from nucleic acid as described above within cells of the plant; a method of identifying and cloning GI homologues from plant species other than Arabidopsis thaliana which method employs a nucleotide sequence derived from that shown in Figures 4A, 4B, 5 or 8; and nucleic acid encoding a GI homologue obtained as described above. DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the Figures: Figure 1 compares an inverse polymerase chain reaction (IPCR) fragment with clone Y 12227. The top line represents the sequence from the IPCR fragment, and the bottom line represents the sequence from clone Y 12227. Figure 2 is a map of the T-DNA insertion site. Figure 3 is a map of the contig and position of cDNA. Figure 4 gives the nucleotide sequence of the ends of cDNAl, with Figure 4A representing the 5' end sequence and Figure 4B representing the 3' end sequence. Position 1 of the 5' end sequence corresponds to nucleotide 1831 1 of Y12227 and amino acid 637 of gene 5. Position 1 of the 3' end sequence corresponds to nucleotide 20312 of Y12227. Figure 5 is a nucleic acid sequence encoding one polypeptide with GI function (from Arabidopsis) . Figure 6 is the amino acid sequence of the expressed GI protein encoded by the sequence of Figure 5. Figure 7 is a genetic map. The bold horizontal lines show BAC clones of Arabidopsis DNA. The vertical lines show the positions of genetic markers on the physical map of BAC clones. M235 and TH1 were positioned relative to GI by genetic mapping. Cosmid 1.1 was isolated by hybridisation to the DNA fragment that is adjacent to the T-DNA in the putatively tagged GI mutant line. Cosmid 1.1 is located in the position expected for GJbased on the genetic mapping with TH1 and m.235. Figure 8 is a further nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide with GI function, (also from Arabidopsis). Figure 9 is the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide encoded by the sequence of Figure 8. Figure 10 shows the results of homology analyses between the predicted GI sequence of Figure 5 and three rice EST's. Figure 11 gives the nucleotide sequence encoding part of a further polypeptide having GI function (from rice). Figure 12 gives the amino acid sequence corresponding to the sequence of Figure 1 1. Figure 13 shows a line up between portions of nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide having GI function, as between Arabidopsis and rice GI cDNA's. Figure 14. The predicted amino acid sequence of the GI protein. Putative transmembrane domains predicted in the protein by membrane topology prediction programs are underlined. Figure 15 shows the effect of gi mutations on the GI protein and on flowering time. Effect of the gi mutations on the GI protein. The position of the mutations in gi-1 to gi-6 on the transcribed region of the GI gene (top). The positions of the gi mutations correspond to the genomic sequence of the GI gene with position 1 at the A of the translation start codon. Exons in the transcribed region are in black and introns are in white. Sequence deletions are indicated by a triangle. The size and structure of the predicted gi mutant proteins are compared. In gi-4, a mutation in the 3' splice acceptor site of intron 12 is expected to cause aberrant splicing of the intron with unknown effects on the C-terminal end of the protein (?). In gi-5, the last eight amino acids of the predicted GI protein are altered and 27 amino acids are added to the carboxyl terminus of the GI protein (light grey bar). Figure 16 shows the flowering time of wild type and gi mutants under LD and SD conditions. The genotype tested is shown along the horizontal axis and the leaf number at flowering is plotted on the vertical axis. Black bars show flowering time in LD conditions and grey bars are those under SD conditions. Figure 17 shows the northern hybridisation analysis of GI expression in different light regimes. Plants were grown in LD or SD conditions until the six leaf stage. Total RNA (10 μg), was extracted from aerial parts harvested at the times shown and analysed by northern hybridisation using a GI cDNA probe. Results are presented as a proportion of the highest value after normalisation with respect to 25/26s rRNA levels. Horizontal bars under each graph represent the light (white) and dark (black) conditions provided. ZT 0 hr is at lights on. Hatched bars represent subjective night experienced in continuous light (LL) and continuous dark (DD) conditions. A. Timecourse of GI expression in plants grown in LD (top), LL (middle) and. DD (bottom). For the LL and DD experiments, plants were entrained in LD and shifted to LL or DD 24 hours before tissue harvesting was initiated at ZT 0. B. Effect of SD and the transition to darkness on GI expression. Plants were grown in SD (top) or LD (bottom). At ZT 10, indicated by the arrow, half of the LD plants were shifted to darkness. Figure 18 shows the expression of GI in elf 3 mutants in LD, SD and LL. elf 3 mutant plants were grown in LD or SD conditions until the six leaf stage. Total RNA (10 μg) was extracted from aerial parts and analysed by northern hybridisation using a GI cDNA probe. Results are presented as a proportion of the highest value after normalisation with respect to 25/26s rRNA levels. Horizontal bars under each graph represent the light (white) and dark (black) conditions provided. ZT 0 hr is at lights on. A. Timecourse of GI expression in LD. B. Timecourse of GI expression in SD. C. Timecourse of GI expression in LL. Figure 19 shows the effect of the CCA 1 -OX transgene on GI expression. Plants were grown in LD or SD conditions until the six leaf stage and shifted to continuous light 24 hours before tissue harvesting was initiated at ZT 0. Hatched bars represent subjective night. Total RNA (10 μg) was extracted from aerial parts. GI transcript levels were analysed by northern hybridisation using a GI cDNA probe. Results are presented as a proportion of the highest value after normalisation with respect to 25/26s rRNA levels. Figure 20 shows the expression of LHY, CCA1, CAB and CO in gi mutants, gi-3 mutant plants were grown in LD conditions until the six leaf stage. Horizontal bars under each graph represent the light (white) and dark (black) conditions provided. ZT 0 hr is at lights on. Total RNA (10 μg) was extracted from aerial parts. A. LHY transcript levels were analysed by northern hybridisation using a LHY cDNA probe. Results are presented as a proportion of the highest value after normalisation with respect to 25/26s rRNA levels. B. CCA1 transcript levels were analysed by northern hybridisation using a CCA1 genomic probe. Results are presented as a proportion of the highest value after normalisation with respect to 25/26s rRNA levels. C. CAB transcript levels levels were analysed by northern hybridisation using a CAB genomic probe. Results are presented as a proportion of the highest value after normalisation with respect to25/26s rRNA levels. D. CO transcript levels were analysed by RT-PCR at two timepoints ZT 0 hr and ZT 12. Results are presented as a proportion of the highest value after normalisation with respect to UBQ mRNA levels. Figure 21 shows the northern hybridisation analysis of GI expression throughout development. Total RNA was extracted from the aerial parts of LD grown plants at the stages shown (from two leaf stage to mature plant). Mature plants had siliques which were fully expanded but still green. RNA was also extracted from specific organs of mature plants as indicated. RNA (10 μg) was hybridised to a GI cDNA probe and the hybridisation signals were normalised and graphed. DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION As described above, the primary focus of the invention is on the GI gene. By "GI gene" as used herein is meant a nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide with GI function. A partial nucleic acid sequence for a specific GI gene according to the invention is shown in each of Figures 4A and 4B. A nucleic acid (cDNA) sequence for an Arabidopsis GI gene is shown in Figure 5. The predicted amino acid sequence of the encoded polypeptide, which has GI function, is shown in Figure 6. Similarly, Figure 8 sets out the nucleic acid (cDNA) sequence encoding another polypeptide having GI function, whereas Figure 9 gives the predicted amino acid sequence of that polypeptide. Analysis of a full length G/ cDNA (4077bp) related to Figure 8 revealed that GThas a coding region of 3522 bp with a 5' untranslated region of 318 bp and 217 bp of 3' untranslated region. The full length GT cDNA is predicted to encode a 1173 amino acid protein of 127 Kd (Figure 9). Web-based membrane topology prediction programmes (Top Pred 2, Von Heijne 1992; PSORT and PSORT2, Nakai and Kanehisa, 1992) predict that the GI polypeptide contains at least four transmembrane domains indicating that it is likely to be a membrane protein. Variants or homologues of the above sequences also form part of the present invention. Polynucleotide or polypeptide sequences may be aligned, and percentage of identical nucleotides in a specified region may be determined against another sequence, using computer algorithms that are publicly available. Two exemplary algorithms for aligning and identifying the similarity of polynucleotide sequences are the BLASTN and FASTA algorithms. The similarity of polypeptide sequences may be examined using the BLASTP algorithm. Both the BLASTN and BLASTP software are available on the NCBI anonymous FTP server (ftp://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) under /blast/executables/. The BLASTN algorithm version 2.0.4 [Feb-24- 1998], set to the default parameters described in the documentation and distributed with the algorithm, is preferred for use in the determination of variants according to the present invention. The use of the BLAST family of algorithms, including BLASTN and BLASTP, is described at NCBI's website at URL http: / /www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/newblast.html and in the publication of Altschul, Stephen F, et al (1997). "Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs", Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. The computer algorithm FASTA is available on the Internet at the ftp site ftp:/ /ftp.virginia.edu.pub/fasta/ . Version 2.0u4, February 1996, set to the default parameters described in the documentation and distributed with the algorithm, is preferred for use in the determination of variants according to the present invention. The use of the FASTA algorithm is described in the W R Pearson and D. J. Lipman, "Improved Tools for Biological Sequence Analysis," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2444-2448 (1988) and W.R. Pearson, "Rapid and Sensitive Sequence Comparison with FASTP and FASTA," Methods in Enzymology 183:63-98 (1990). The following running parameters are preferred for determination of alignments and similarities using BLASTN that contribute to E values (as discussed below) and percentage identity: Unix running command: blastall -p blastn -d embldb -e 10 -G 1 -E 1 -r 2 -v 50 -b 50 -I queryseq -o results; and parameter default values: -i queryseq -o results; and parameter default values: -p Program Name [String] -e Expectation value (E) [Real] -G Cost to open a gap (zero invokes default behaviour) [Integer] -E Cost to extend a gap (zero invokes default behaviour) [Integer] -r Reward for a nucleotide match (blastn only) [Integer] -v Number of one-line descriptions (V) [Integer] -b Number of alignments to show (B) [Integer] -i Query File [File In] -o BLAST report Output File [File Out] Optional For BLASTP the following running parameters are preferred: blastall -p blastp -d swissprotdb -e 10 -G 1 -E 1 -v 50 -b 50 -I queryseq -o results -p Program Name [String] -d Database [String] -e Expectation value (E) [Real] -G Cost to open a gap (zero invokes a default behaviour) [Integer] -E Cost to extend a gap (zero invokes a default behaviour) [Integer] -v Number of one-line descriptions (v) [Integer] -b Number of alignments to show (b) [Integer] -I Query File [File In] -o BLAST report Output File [File Out] Optional Homology may be at the nucleotide sequence and/ or encoded amino acid sequence level. Preferably, the nucleic acid and/ or amino acid sequence shares at least about 60%, or 70%, or 80% homology, most preferably at least about 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% homology. Homology may be over the full-length of the relevant sequence shown herein, or may be over a part of it, preferably over a contiguous sequence of about or greater than about 20, 25, 30, 33, 40, 50, 67, 133, 167, 200, 233, 267, 300, 333, 400 or more amino acids or codons, compared with Figures 6 and 9, or 5 and 10, respectively. A GI homologue (or orthologue) from rice has also been identified. The partial cDNA sequence (EST) for this orthologue is given in Figure 1 1, whereas the predicted amino acid sequence is given in Figure 12. A line up of the relevant domains of the respective nucleotide sequences as between Figures 8 and 1 1 is given in Figure 13, showing 78.35% similarity and 67.83% identity. A variant polypeptide in accordance with the present invention may include within the sequence shown in Figure 6, Figure 9 or Figure 12, a single amino acid or 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9 changes, about 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 or 50 changes, or greater than about 50, 60, 70, 80 or 90 changes. In addition, to one or more changes within the amino acid sequence shown, a variant polypeptide may include additional amino acids at the C-terminus and/ or N-terminus. Naturally, changes to the nucleic acid which make no difference to the encoded polypeptide (ie. "degeneratively equivalent") are not included. The activity of a variant polypeptide may be assessed by transformation into a host cell capable of expressing the nucleic acid of the invention. Methodology for such transformation is described in more detail below. In a further aspect of the invention there is disclosed a method of producing a derivative nucleic acid comprising the step of modifying any of the sequences disclosed above, particularly the sequences of Figure 5, Figure 8 or Figure 11. Changes may be desirable for a number of reasons. For instance they may introduce or remove restriction endonuclease sites or alter codon usage. Alternatively changes to a sequence may produce a derivative by way of one or more of addition, insertion, deletion or substitution of one or more nucleotides in the nucleic acid, leading to the addition, insertion, deletion or substitution of one or more amino acids in the encoded polypeptide. Such changes may modify sites which are required for post translation modification such as cleavage sites in the encoded polypeptide; motifs in the encoded polypeptide for glycosylation, lipoylation, etc. Leader or other targeting sequences (eg. membrane or golgi locating sequences) may be added to the expressed protein to determine its location following expression. Other desirable mutation may be random or site directed mutagenesis in order to alter the activity (eg. specificity) or stability of the encoded polypeptide. Changes may be by way of conservative variation, ie. substitution of one hydrophobic residue such as isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine for another, or the substitution of one polar residue for another, such as arginine for lysine, glutamic for aspartic acid, or glutamine for asparagine. As is well known to those skilled in the art, altering the primary structure of a polypeptide by a conservative substitution may not significantly alter the activity of that peptide because the side- chain of the amino acid which is inserted into the sequence may be able to form similar bonds and contacts as the side chain of the amino acid which has been substituted out. This is so even ' when the substitution is in a region which is critical in determining the peptides conformation. Also included are variants having non-conservative substitutions. As is well known to those skilled in the art, substitutions to regions of a peptide which are not critical in determining its conformation may not greatly affect its activity because they do not greatly alter the peptide's three dimensional structure. In regions which are critical in determining the peptides conformation or activity such changes may confer advantageous properties on the polypeptide. Indeed, changes such as those described above may confer slightly advantageous properties on the peptide eg. altered stability or specificity. In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of identifying and/ or cloning a nucleic acid variant from a plant which method employs a GI sequence described above. In one embodiment, nucleotide sequence information provided herein may be used in a database (eg. of EST's or STS's) search to find homologous sequences, such as those which may become available in due course, and expression products of which can be tested for activity as described below. In another embodiment the nucleotide sequence information provided herein may be used to design probes and primers for probing or amplification of GI or variants thereof. An oligonucleotide for use in probing or PCR may be about 30 or fewer nucleotides in length (eg. 18, 21 or 24). Generally specific primers are upwards of 14 nucleotides in length. For optimum specificity and cost effectiveness, primers of 16-24 nucleotides in length may be preferred. Those skilled in the art are well versed in the design of primers for use processes such as PCR. If required, probing can be done with entire restriction fragments of the gene disclosed herein which may be 100's or even lOOO's of nucleotides in length. Naturally sequences may be based on Figure 5, Figure 8 or Figure 1 1, or the complement thereof. Small variations may be introduced into the sequence to produce "consensus" or "degenerate" primers if required. Such probes and primers also form one aspect of the present invention. Probing may employ the standard Southern blotting technique. For instance DNA may be extracted from cells and digested with different restriction enzymes. Restriction fragments may then be separated by electrophoresis on an agarose gel, before denaturation and transfer to a nitrocellulose filter. Labelled probe may be hybridised to the DNA fragments on the filter and binding determined. DNA for probing may be prepared from RNA preparations from cells. Probing may optionally be done by means of so-called 'nucleic acid chips' (see Marshall & Hodgson (1998) Nature Biotechnology 16: 27-31, for a review). In one embodiment, a variant in accordance with the present invention is obtainable by means of a method which includes: (a) providing a preparation of nucleic acid, eg from plant cells. Test nucleic acid may be provided from a cell as genomic DNA, cDNA or RNA, or a mixture of any of these, preferably as a library in a suitable vector. If genomic DNA is used the probe may be used to identify untranscribed regions of the gene (eg promoters etc) as described hereinafter, (b) providing a probe or primer as discussed above, (c) containing nucleic acid in said preparation with said nucleic acid molecule under conditions for hybridisation of said nucleic acid molecule to any said gene or homologue in said preparation, and, (d) identifying said gene or homologue if present by its hybridisation with said nucleic acid molecule. Binding of a probe to target nucleic acid (eg DNA) may be measured using any of a variety of techniques at the disposal of those skilled in the art. For instance, probes may be radioactively, fluorescently or enzymatically labelled. Other methods not employing labelling of probe include amplification using PCR (see below), RN'ase cleavage and allele specific oligonucleotide probing. The identification of successful hybridisation is followed by isolation of the nucleic acid which has hybridised, which may involve one or more steps of PCR or amplification of a vector in a suitable host. Preliminary experiments may be performed by hybridising under low stringency conditions. For probing, preferred conditions are those which are stringent enough for there to be a simple pattern with a small number of hybridisations identified as positive which can be investigated further. For example, hybridisations may be performed, according to the method of Sambrook et al. (below) using a hybridisation solution comprising: 5X SSC (wherein 'SSC = 1.15 M sodium chloride; 0.15 M sodium citrate; pH 7), 5X Denhardt's reagent, 0.5- 1 0% SDS, 100 μg/ml denatured, fragmented salmon sperm DNA, 0.05% sodium pyrophosphate and up to 50% formamide. Hybridisation is carried out at 37-42°C for at least six hours. Following hybridisation, filters are washed as follow: ( 1) 5 minutes at room temperature in 2X SSC and 1% SDS; (2) 15 minutes at room temperature in 2X SSC and 0.1% SDS; (3) 30 minutes - 1 hour at 37°C in IX SSC and 1% SDS; (4) 2 hours at 42-65°C in IX SSC and 1% SDS, changing the solution every 30 minutes. One common formula for calculating the stringency conditions required to achieve hybridisation between nucleic acid molecules of a specified sequence homology is (Sambrook et al., 1989): T m = 8. 15°C + 16.6Log [Na+] + 0.41 (% G+C) - 0.63 (% formamide) - 600/#bp in duplex. As an illustration of the above formula, using [Na+] = [0.368] and 50-% formamide, with GC content of 42% and an average probe size of 200 bases, the T m is 57°C. The Tm of a DNA duplex decreases by 1 - 1.5°C with every 1% decrease in homology. Thus, targets with greater than about 75% sequence identity would be observed using a hybridisation temperature of 42°C. Such a sequence would be considered substantially homologous to the nucleic acid sequence of the present invention. It is well known in the art to increase stringency of hybridisation gradually until only a few positive clones remain. Other suitable conditions include hybridising at 65°C in 10% dextran sulphate, 1% SDS, 1 M NaCl, 50μg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA followed by two rinses in 2 x SSC at room temperature then washing at 65°C in 1 x SSC, 0.1 %SDS for medium stringency or 0. 1 x SSC, 0. 1 %SDS for high stringency. In a further embodiment, hybridisation of nucleic acid molecule to a variant may be determined or identified indirectly, eg using a nucleic acid amplification reaction, particularly the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR requires the use of two primers to specifically amplify target nucleic acid, so preferably two nucleic acid molecules with characteristic sequences are employed. Using RACE PCR, only one such primer may be needed (see "PCR protocols; A Guide to Methods and Applications", Eds. Innis et al, Academic Press, New York, (1990)). The present invention also contemplates a vector which comprises nucleic acid with any one of the provided sequences, preferably a vector from which polypeptide (or at least the functional portion thereof) encoded by the nucleic acid sequence can be expressed. The vector is preferably suitable for transformation into a plant cell. The invention further encompasses a host cell transformed with such a vector, especially a plant cell. Thus, a host cell, such as a plant cell, comprising nucleic acid according to the present invention is provided. Within the cell, the nucleic acid may be incorporated within the chromosome. There may be more than one heterologous nucleotide sequence per haploid genome. This, for example, enables increased expression of the gene product compared with endogenous levels, as discussed below. A vector comprising nucleic acid according to the present invention need not include a promoter or other regulatory sequence, particularly if the vector is to be used to introduce the nucleic acid into cells for recombination into the genome. Nucleic acid molecules and vectors according to the present invention may be provided isolated from their natural environment, in substantially pure or homogenous form. Nucleic acid may of course be double- or single-stranded, cDNA or genomic DNA, RNA, wholly or partially synthetic, as appropriate. Synthesis can be automated using equipment such as is commercially available from suppliers such as Perkin Elmer/ Applied Biosystems Division (Foster City, CA, USA) following manufacturers instructions. The present invention also encompasses methods of making the polypeptide of the invention having GI function by expression from encoding nucleic acid therefor under suitable conditions in suitable host cells. Those skilled in the art are well able to construct vectors and design protocols for expression and recovery of products of recombinant gene expression. Suitable vectors can be chosen or constructed, containing appropriate regulatory sequences, including promoter sequences, terminator fragments, polyadenylation sequences, enhancer sequences, marker genes and other sequences as appropriate. For further details see, for example, Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual: 2 nd edition, Sambrook et al. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Regulatory sequences which are endogenous to the target plant are preferred. Transformation procedures depend on the host used, but are well known. Also according to the invention there is provided a plant cell having incorporated into its genome a sequence of nucleotides as provided by the present invention, under operative control of a regulatory sequence for control of expression. A further aspect of the present invention provides a method of making such a plant cell involving introduction of a vector comprising the sequence of nucleotides into a plant cell and causing or allowing recombination between the vector and the plant cell genome to introduce the sequence of nucleotides into the genome. Techniques for stably incorporating vectors into the genome of target cells are well known in the art and include Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated introduction, electroporation, protoplast fusion, injection into reproductive organs, injection into immature embryos, high velocity projectile introduction and the like. Plants which comprise a plant cell according to the invention are also provided, along with any part or propagule thereof, seed, selfed or hybrid progeny and descendants. The invention further provides a method of influencing the flowering characteristics of a plant comprising expression of a heterologous GI gene sequence (or mutant, allele, derivative or homologue thereof, as discussed) within cells of the plant. The term "heterologous" indicates that the gene /sequence of nucleotides in question has been introduced into cells of the plant using genetic engineering, ie by human intervention. The gene may be on an extra-genomic vector or • incorporated, preferably stably, into the genome. The heterologous gene may replace an endogenous equivalent gene, ie one which normally performs the same or a similar function in control of flowering, or the inserted sequence may be additional to the endogenous gene. An advantage of introduction of a heterologous gene is the ability to place expression of the gene under the control of a promoter of choice, in order to be able to influence gene expression, and therefore flowering, according to preference. Furthermore, mutants and derivatives of the wild-type gene, eg with higher or lower activity than wild-type, may be used in plant of the endogenous gene. The principal flowering characteristic which may be altered using the present invention is the timing of flowering. Under-expression of the gene product of the GI gene leads to delayed flowering (as suggested by the gi mutant phenotype); over- expression may lead to precocious flowering. This degree of control is useful to ensure synchronous flowering of male and female parent lines in hybrid production, for example. Another use is to advance or retard the flowering in accordance with the dictates of the climate so as to extend or reduce the growing season. This may involve use of anti-sense or sense regulation. The nucleic acid according to the invention, such as a GI gene or homologue, may be placed under the control of an externally inducible gene promoter to place the timing of flowering under the control of the user. This is advantageous in that flower production, and subsequent events such as seed set, may be timed to meet market demands, for example, in cut flowers or decorative flowering pot plants. Delaying flowering in pot plants is advantageous to lengthen the period available for transport of the product from the producer to the point of sale and lengthening of the flowering period is an obvious advantage to the purchaser. The term "inducible" as applied to a promoter is well understood by those skilled in the art. In essence, expression under the control of an inducible promoter is "switched on" or increased in response to an applied stimulus. The nature of the stimulus various between promoters. Some inducible promoters cause little or undetectable levels of expression (or no expression) in the absence of the appropriate stimulus. Other inducible promoters cause detectable constitutive expression in the absence of the stimulus. Whatever the level of expression is in the absence of the stimulus, expression from any inducible promoter is increased ih the presence of the correct stimulus. The preferable situation is where the level of expression increases upon application of the relevant stimulus by an amount effective to alter a phenotypic characteristic. Thus an inducible (or "switchable") promoter may be used which causes a basic level of expression in the absence of the stimulus which level is too low to bring about a desired phenotype (and may in fact be zero). Upon application of the stimulus, expression is increased (or switched on) to a level which brings about the desired phenotype. Suitable promoters include the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S (CaMV 35S) gene promoter that is expressed at a high level in virtually all plant tissues (Benfey et al, 1990a and 1990b); the maize glutathione-S-transferase isoform II (GST-II-27) gene promoter which is activated in response to application of exogenous safener (WO 93/01294, ICI Ltd); the cauliflower meri 5 promoter that is expressed in the vegetable apical meristem as well as several well localised positions in the plant body, eg inner phloem, flower primordia, branching points in root and shoot (Medford, 1992; Medford et al. 1991) and the Arabidopsis thaliana LEAFY promoter that is expressed very early in flower development (Weigel et al. 1992). When introducing a chosen gene construct into a cell, certain considerations must be taken into account, well known to those skilled in the art. The nucleic acid to be inserted should be assembled within a construct which contains effective regulatory elements which will drive transcription. There must be available a method of transporting the construct into the cell. Once the construct is within the cell membrane, integration into the endogenous chromosomal material either will or will not occur. Finally, as far as plants are concerned the target cell type must be such that cells can be regenerated into whole plants. Plants transformed with a DNA molecule containing the sequence may be produced by standard techniques for the genetic manipulation of plants. DNA can be transformed into plant cells using any suitable technology, such as a disarmed Ti- plasmid vector carried by Agrobacterium exploiting its natural gene transfer ability (EP-A-270355, EP-A-01 16718, NAR 12(22) 871 1 - 87215 1984), particle or microprojectile bombardment (US 5100792, EP-A-444882, EP-A-434616) microinjection (WO 92/09696, WO 94/00583, EP 331083, EP 175966), electroporation (EP 290395, WO 87/06614) or other forms of direct DNA uptake (DE 4005152, WO 90/ 12096, US 468461 1). Agrobacteήum transformation is widely used by those skilled in the art to transform dicotyledonous species. Although Agrobacterium has been reported to be able to transform foreign DNA into some monocotyledonous species (WO 92/ 14828), microprojectible bombardment, electroporation and direct DNA uptake are preferred where Agrobacterium is ineffecicient or ineffective. Alternatively, a combination of different techniques may be employed to enhance the efficiency of the transformation process, eg. bombardment with Agrobacterium coated microparticles (EP-A-486234) or microprojectile bombardment to induce wounding followed by co-cultivation with Agrobacterium (EP-A-486233). The particular choice of a transformation technology will be determined by its efficiency to transform certain plant species as well as the experience and preference of the person practising the invention with a particular methodology of choice. It will be apparent to the skilled person that the particular choice of a transformation system to introduce nucleic acid into plant cells is not essential to or a limitation of the invention. In the present invention, over-expression may be achieved by introduction of the nucleotide sequence in a sense orientation. Thus, the present invention provides method of influencing a flowering characteristic of a plant, the method comprising causing or allowing expression of the polypeptide encoded by the nucleotide sequence of nucleic acid according to the invention from that nucleic acid within cells of the plant. Under-expression of the gene product polypeptide may be achieved using anti-sense technology or "sense regulation". The use of anti-sense genes or partial gene sequences to down-regulate gene expression is now well-established. DNA is placed under the control of a promoter such that transcription of the "anti-sense" strand of the DNA yields RNA which is complementary to normal mRNA transcribed from the "sense" strand of the target gene. For double-stranded DNA this is achieved by placing a coding sequence or a fragment thereof in a "reverse orientation" under the control of a promoter. The complementary anti-sense RNA sequence is thought then to bind with mRNA to form a duplex, inhibiting translation of the endogenous RNA from the target gene into protein. (See, for example, Rothstein et al. 1987; Smith et al. 1988; Zhang et al. 1992) Thus, the present invention also provides a method of influencing a flowering characteristic of a plant, the method comprising causing or allowing anti-sense transcription from nucleic acid according to the invention within cells of the plant. When additional copies of the target gene are inserted in sense, that is the same, orientation as the target gene, a range of phenotypes is produced which includes individuals where over- expression occurs and some where under-expression of protein from the target gene occurs. When the inserted gene is only part of the endogenous gene the number of under-expressing individuals in the transgenic population increases. (See for example, van der Krol 1990; Napoli et al. 1990; Zhang et al. 1992). Thus, the present invention also provides a method of influencing a flowering characteristic of a plant, the method comprising causing or allowing expression from nucleic acid according to the invention within cells of the plant. This may be used to suppress activity of a polypeptide with ability to influence a flowering characteristic. Here the activity of the polypeptide is preferably suppressed as a result of under-expression within the plant cells. As stated above, the expression pattern of the GI gene may be altered by fusing it to a foreign promoter. For example, International patent application WO 93/01294 of Imperial Chemical Industries Limited describes a chemically inducible gene promoter sequence isolated from a 27 kD subunit of the maize glutathione-S- transferase, isoform II gene (GST-II-27). It has been found that when linked to an exogenous gene and introduced into a plant by transformation, the GST-II-27 promoter provides a means for the external regulation of the expression of that exogenous gene. The GST-II-27 gene promoter has been shown to be induced by certain chemical compounds which can be applied to growing plants. The promoter is functional in both monocotyledons and dicotyledons. It can therefore be used to control gene expression in a variety of genetically modified plants, including field crops such as canola, sunflower, tobacco, sugerbeet, cotton; cereals such as wheat, barley, rice, maize, sorghum; fruit such as tomatoes, mangoes, peaches, apples, pears, strawberries, bananas and melons; and vegetables such as carrots, lettuce, cabbage and onion. The GST-II-27 promoter is also suitable for use in a variety of tissues, including roots, leaves, stems and reproductive tissues. Accordingly, the present invention contemplates in a further aspect a gene construct comprising an inducible promoter operatively linked to a nucleotide sequence provided by the present invention, such as the GI gene of Arabidopsis thaliana, a homologous gene from another plant species or any variant thereof. This enables control of expression of the gene. The invention also provides plants transformed with said gene construct and methods comprising introduction of such a construct into a plant cell and/ or induction of expression of a construct within a plant cell, by application of a suitable stimulus, an effective exogenous inducer. The promoter may be the GST-II-27 gene promoter or any other inducible plant promoter. Aspects and embodiments of the present invention will now be illustrated, by way of example, with reference to the experimental section. Further aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. All documents mentioned in this text are incorporated herein by reference. EXPERIMENTAL Part A Plant Material and Plant Growth Conditions Arabidopsis ecotypes Wassilewskija (Ws), C24 and Landsberg erecta (Ler) were obtained from Lehle Seeds (Round Rock, Texas). Seeds of gi mutant alleles (gi- 1-6) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Centre at Ohio University. Seed was cold treated before sowing by placing on wet filter paper at 4 C for 2 - 4 days. Seed was sown on a peat:sand growth media or soil, and plants were grown at ~ 22 °C in the greenhouse (12 - 16 h light / 8 - 12 h dark). Light extensions were provided as required with mercury vapour growth lamps (Sylvania) . Seedlings grown in vitro were cultured at 22 C in the presence of cool white fluorescent light (16 h light / 8 h dark). Bacterial Strains and Plasmids The Agrobacterium strain GV3101 containing pMP90RK (Koncz and Schell 1986) was used for all plant transformations. The binary vector, pGKB5 (Bouchez et al. 1993), was used for T-DNA tagging experiments. The T-DNA of this vector contains the bar plant selectable-marker gene that confers resistance to the herbicide Basta, and the nptπ gene that confers resistance to the antibiotic kanamycin. The T-DNA also carries a GUS reporter gene close to the right T-DNA border for plant promoter trapping. The pGKB5 DNA sequence is available at http:/ /nasc.nott.ac.uk:8300/Vol2ϋ/bouchez.html. Vacuum Infiltration Transformation Plasmids were transferred to Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 by freeze-thaw transformation (Holsters et al. 1978). Agrobacterium transconjugants were selected on YM media (Vincent 1985) supplemented with rifampicin, kanamycin (both 50 mg L" 1 ), and gentamycin (25 mg L- 1 ). The Agrobacterium solution was prepared for vacuum infiltration as described by Bechtold et al. (1993). Overnight Agrobacterium cultures were inoculated into LB or YN broth supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics. Three litre cultures were grown overnight to OD^Q = 0.8, harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 1 L of infiltration solution consisting of MS salts with 5 % sucrose w/v and 10 μg L- 1 benzylaminopurine. Silwet L-77 (Lehle Seeds) was added to the infiltration solution at 0.005% v/v where specified. Silwet L-77 is an organosilicane compound (polyalkleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane) with low phytotoxicity. Arabidopsis transformation was carried out essentially as described by Bechtold et al. (1993) using healthy flowering plants (3 - 5 weeks old). At this stage, the first siliques were beginning to develop, on the primary inflorescence. Twenty to forty plants were uprooted and submerged in 300 - 500 mL of Agrobacterium solution in a 10 L desiccation vessel. Plants were infiltrated for 20 min in a vacuum of 686mm Hg (using a Javac DSL- 150 direct drive, single stage, high vacuum pump), with occasional swirling of the boiling Agrobacterium. The vacuum was released slowly over 2 - 4 min. The plants were repotted and placed in a greenhouse. Plants were covered with plastic for the first 3 days after infiltration to prevent desiccation. Plants were allowed to self fertilise and the resulting Tl seed was collected in bulk from dried siliques. Selection of Transformant Plants Screening for transformants was performed in the greenhouse by sowing 200 mg (- 10,000) Tl seed on a 320 x 235 mm perlite base overlaid with sand, and sub- irrigating with 10 mg L" 1 ammonium glufosinate in the form of Basta herbicide (BASF, 200 mg L- 1 ammonium glufosinate). After 10 - 14 days of selection, transformant plants were transplanted to a peat: sand growth media and grown to maturity in the greenhouse. Transformants were allowed to self fertilise, and T2 seed was collected individually from each Tl plant. Mutant screening and analysis T2 seed (100-400) of transformant lines was cold treated for 3 days on moist filter paper at 4 °C and sown out in the greenhouse. Plants were screened by eye for late- flowering phenotypes. Flowering time was measured by days to flowering and by counting the number of rosette leaves at flowering (Koornneef et al. 1991). In a screen of 800 transformant lines a transformant was identified that flowered approximately two weeks later than wild-type. Linkage analysis by the Kanamycin Resistance Assay The late-flowering mutant was back-crossed to wild type and mutants from the F2 generation of this cross were tested for linkage between the T-DNA insert and the mutation. Seeds (200 - 400) were surface sterilized and placed on GM medium agar plates containing 100 mg L- 1 kanamycin. After 14 days, the seedlings were scored for kanamycin resistance. The ratio of resistant to sensitive seedlings was used to determine whether the parent plant was heterozgous or homozygous for the T-DNA insertion according to Mendelian principles. Linkage tests indicated that the gi gene was likely to be tagged with the T-DNA tag as no recombination events between the T-DNA and the mutation were seen in 120 chromosomes. Allelism tests The late-flowering mutant was crossed with 12 Arabidopsis late-flowering mutants (ft-ljve-l, fd-1, fca-1, fpa-1, fy-1, fha-1, fwa-1, fe-1, constans-1, gigantea-3, and luminidependens-3). The flowering- time of the FI progeny plants from each cross, the flowering-time mutants and wild type ecotypes were then compared. The FI progeny of the cross to gi-3 flowered late, indicating that the late flowering T-DNA mutant was an allele of the GIGANTEA gene (gi). This was named gi-TDNA. Inverse Polymerase Chain Reaction (IPCR) Plant DNA flanking the left border of the T-DNA insertion was isolated by IPCR as described by Long et al. (1993). Arabidopsis genomic DNA prepared according to the method of Doyle and Doyle (1990) was digested with a selction of restriction endonucleases. The digested DNA was then ligated and used as the template for IPCR as follows. IPCR was performed using nested primers (consisting of an external pair; gkb8- 5'AGC TGGTAC ATT GCC GTA G3' and gkb9-5TTT TTG CTT GGA CTA TAA TAC C3' and an internal pair; gkb7-5TAG ATG AAA GAC TGA GTG CGA T3' and gkbl0-5'CTA CAA ATT GCC TTT TCT TAT C3';) which contained sequences from the left border of the pGKB5 T-DNA. A 1.4 kilobase IPCR fragment was isolated that contained T- DNA left border sequences and flanking Arabidopsis sequences. The IPCR fragment was found to be identical to Arabidopsis genomic sequence which had been sequenced as part of the European Union programme of European Scientist Sequencing Arabidopsis (ESSA) (Genbank accession Y12227; Terryn et al 1997) (Figure 1). Clone isolation and analysis The IPCR fragment was used to screen 20,000 clones from an Arabidopsis genomic library in λFIX. Five overlapping clones were isolated and restriction mapped. Southern hybridization analysis (Southern, 1975) using fragments from these lambda clones as a probe against wild type and gi-TDNA mutant DNA showed that the T-DNA insertion had caused a deletion of approximately 3 kilobases upon insertion (Figure 2), with the deletion starting at base 14853 on clone Y12227. Fragments of these clones were used to probe 40,000 clones from a transformation competent cosmid library constructed from Ihy mutant DNA (Schaffer, 1997). Eight overlapping cosmid clones were isolated and also restriction mapped.. A cosmid contig spanning the region was constructed (Figure 3). Cosmd 1.1 (~ 15kb) was shown to span the entire genomic region affected by the T-DNA insertion. The conclusion was that cosmid 1.1 contains the GI gene. A 7.5 kb Xbal fragment of cosmid 1.1 which spanned the region of the T-DNA insertion was used to screen 540,000 clones from the λPRL-2 cDNA library (Obtained from ABRC, Ohio State University, USA). Three identical cDNAs were isolated and sequenced from both ends using the the dideoxynucleotide chain terminator method (Sanger et al.. 1977). Databases were searched for homology to the cDNA sequences using the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group (GCG) programmes and BLAST (Altschul et al. 1990). The 5' and 3' end sequences from the longest cDNA clone, (cDNAl) are shown in Figure 4. cDNAl was found to be a truncated cDNA of the predicted gene 5 from the genomic clone (Figure 5) (Genbank accession Y12227; Terryn et al 1997). The position of cDNAl on predicted gene 5 protein is shown in Figure 3. Seven genes are predicted in the 24kb sequence of clone Y 12227. The deletion in gi-TDNA specifically deletes part of the predicted gene 5 (Figure 3). The position of cDNA 1 on the predicted gene 5 protein is shown (Figure 3). It was therefore concluded that gene 5 is likely to be the GI gene and to encode a GI protein having the amino acid sequence shown in Figure 6. However, it is to be emphasised that this conclusion was not and could not be drawn from the bare sequence information. No association or linkage was drawn by Terryn et al between gene 5 and flowering timing and/ or starch accumulation. Further, the sequence was merely predicted to be a gene - it was neither isolated to confirm this nor expressed to identify an encoded protein product. Confirmatory Mapping Studies In order to map the position of the GI gene relative to RFLP markers, a gi mutant in the ■ Landsberg erecta ecotype was crossed to wild- type Columbia. The FI plants were self-fertilised and the F2 generation sown out. DNA was extracted from 800 late-flowering F2 plants that were presumed to be homozygous for the gi mutation. The work of Araki and Komeda had previously shown that GI mapped to chromosome 1 close to the RFLP marker m.235 (Araki and Komeda 1993). All 800 DNA preps were tested with a PCR CAPS marker that was available for m235. The vast majority of plants tested were homozygous for the Landsberg erecta polymorphism with m235, which was expected if GI mapped close to m235. However, 13 plants were identified that were heterozygous for Landsberg erecta and Columbia polymorphisms, and were presumed to carry cross-overs between m235 and gi. These 13 recombinants were then tested with a second CAPS marker. This marker, THl, was made using the DNA sequence of BAC F19G10 that was available from the Arabidopsis genome sequencing programme. When the 13 recombinants with cross-overs between gi and m235 were tested with THl, 8 were found to be homozygous for Landsberg erecta polymorphisms and 5 were heterozygous for Landsberg erecta and Columbia. This suggested that G/was close to THl, and was on the opposite side of THl from m235. The physical map of the region is shown in Figure 7, and the positions of both of these markers are shown. The cosmid 1.1 was hybridised to the BAC clones that make up the physical map. As shown in the figure this hybridised to BAC clones that also hybridised to TH l and was on the side of TH 1 expected for GI. These data are therefore consistent with cosmid 1.1 being located at the position expected for GI. Analysis of additional gi alleles In order to test for changes to the DNA structure in the 6 classical gi mutant alleles, primers were designed that amplified fragments of DNA around the insertion site of the T-DNA. One pair of primers used were pfl6 forward (GTTCAGACGTTCAAAGGC) and pfl6 reverse (AACTCCAATCCCAAAACC) that amplified a fragment extending from bases 18634 to 21169 in the Terryn sequence. This was used to amplify the fragment from all 6 gi alleles {gi-1 to gi-6) and from Landsberg erecta and Columbia wild-types. The fragments were run out on an agarose gel, but no obvious change to the fragment size was detected in any of the mutants. To test more stringently for changes, this fragment was then cleaved with the restriction enzyme Hαelll, and the resulting fragments separated on an agarose gel. Six fragments were expected in this digestion and these were 16, 820, 266, 70, 242 and 1 121 bases long. In the wild-type controls and five of the mutants four fragments were detected on the agarose gel, these were 820, 266, 242 and 1 12 1 bases long, while the 16 and 70 bp fragments were too small to be detected on the gel. However, in allele gi- 1 the 242 bp fragment was missing, and was replaced by a fragment that was approximately 300 bp long. The 242 bp fragment and the 70 bp fragment are adjacent to one another in the gene 5 sequence, and this arrangement in gi- 1 could have occurred if the mutation had removed the Hαelll site that separates these two fragments, producing a larger fragment. This Hαelll site is located at position 19805 in the Terryn sequence, which in turn is within the predicted exon 1 1 of gene 5. Therefore gi- 1 causes a disruption in the gene 5 sequence, which taken together with the alteration in the T-DNA tagged allele strongly suggests that gene 5 is the GI gene. Isolation and Sequencing of a Second cDNA from Arabidopsis Encoding a Polypeptide Having GI Function RNA was extracted from Arabidopsis seedlings by the method of Logemann et al (1987). This was converted into cDNA as described by Putterill et al (1995). The GI cDNA was then amplified in three fragments by PCR using primers designed from the genomic sequence. The three fragments were amplified with the following primers: 5' fragment with oli26 (TTCGGTTCCTGGATGGCT) and oli2R (TGGTTCAAGAGCTGGAAG); middle clone with oli28 (TGGAGAGCTCAAGCCGCCAACCAT) and oli30R (CTCTTGCTACCACTAGACTGTGCTTC); and 3' clone with oli29 (CACAGTCTAGTGGTAGCAAGAG) and oli7R (GTGGGTGCTCGTTATTGG) . These three fragments were then sequenced using a cycle sequencing kit purchased from Perkin Elmer. The results are shown in Figure 8 (nucleotide sequence) and Figure 9 (amino acid sequence). As can be seen from Figure 8, the nucleotide sequence was identical to the sequence of Figure 5 except that 18 extra bases were contained within the 5' fragment. Homology to Rice ESTs The predicted protein sequence of gene 5 (Figure 6) was compared to DNA sequences in the Genbank EST database, translated in all 6 open reading frames using BLASTP (Altschul et al, (1990)). Gene 5 showed homology to a number of rice ESTs. These ESTs were homologous to different parts of the protein. Rice EST C73052 showed homology to the amino terminus of the gene (residues 30 to 262). Rice EST C72988 showed homology to residues 591 to 748. Rice EST D40642 showed homology to residues 958 to 1073 (see Figure 10 - 81.237% similarity and 71.443% identity). A Rice cDNA Derived From a Probable Orthologue of GI The three rice EST's (C73052, C72988, and D40642) discussed above were short fragments of longer cDNAs. To obtain longer sequences, the size of the cDNAs present in each of the ESTs was determined by restriction enzyme digestion. The longest clone was C73052, which contained a cDNA of approximately 3.3 kb. To derive as long a rice sequence as possible from these three cDNAs, they were sequenced using primers that annealed to the vector sequences on each side of the cDNA insert. The primers used were T7 (5'-AATACGACTCACTATAG), M- 13-20 (5'- GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT) and M13-reverse (5'-AACAGCTATGACCATG). The sequences obtained in this way were then extended using primers that annealed to the rice sequences obtained with the vector primers. The primers used were rice 1- F (5'-CCCACAACTTATGCCATCCAC), rice 2-R (5'-CCTCAGAGGAATGATTATCAC), rice 3-F (5'-GCCATGCTTAAATGCACTGTC) and rice 4-R (5'-TTGTCAGCAAGTGAGTGGG). These four primers were used to sequence clone C73052. A second set of primers were then made to extend the sequence further. These were desired to anneal to the ends of the sequences obtained with rice primers rice 1,2,3,4 described above, and were rice 5-F (5'-CAGATGCACTTGATGCAGCAG), rice 6-R (5'-AGCAGCTACAACAATTTCAGC), rice 7-F (5'-GTCAGAAGCAGGAGCTATG) and rice 8-R (5'-TTCACCATCAACAAGCATTCC). To finally complete and confirm the sequence of EST C73052 two further primers were used. These were rice 9-R (5'- CCTTGTCTCTTCTT) and rice 10-F (5'-CTCTGTTCTCCTTGAAGCC). The sequence of the longest open reading frame extending 2034 bp is shown in Figure 1 1 and the predicted protein sequence is shown in Figure 12 and compared with the Arabidopsis protein sequence of Glin Figure 13. Strategies to extend the rice GI EST Comparison of the predicted sequence of the protein encoded by the rice EST with the sequence of the predicted Arabidopsis GI protein indicates that the rice sequence is not full length. The rice protein is probably approximately 183 amino acids longer than is shown in Figure 12. Several strategies could be used to provide a full length cDNA. The most commonly used method is to complete the cDNA by 5' RACE. In this method a full length cDNA can be isolated by using a gene specific primers and a non-specific primer that anneals to a homopolymeric tail added to the 3' end of the single stranded cDNA. Such methods are often called rapid amplification of cDNA ends or RACE (See Boehringer Mannheim Catalogue, 1996, p l43; Boehringer Mannheim 5'/3' RACE kit, Catalogue No. 1734 792). A 5' RACE method could therefore be used to isolate the 5' end of the rice cDNA. This would require the isolation of RNA from rice plants by standard methods, the synthesis of single strand cDNA (as described by Boehringer Mannheim Catalogue, 1996, pl43; Boehringer Mannheim 5'/3' RACE kit, Catalogue No. 1734 792), the use of terminal transferase to add a homopolymeric A-tail to the 3' end of the cDNA, and amplification of the tailed cDNA by PCR using a specific primer for the rice GI gene close to the end of the existing sequence (5'-CTTCTAATACCCAGAGGTGC) and the oligo dT- anchor primer (as described Boehringer Mannheim Catalogue, 1996, p l43; Boehringer Mannheim 5'/3' RACE kit, Catalogue No. 1734 792). The obtained cDNA is further amplified by a second PCR using a nested specific primer for the rice GI gene (5'-GCAATATGTCTGTGATCCAAGG) and the PCR anchor primer (as described Boehringer Mannheim Catalogue, 1996, pl43; Boehringer Mannheim 5'/3' RACE kit, Catalogue No. 1734 792). The RACE products can be cloned into an appropriate plasmid vector such as Bluescript for sequencing. Part B Plant Material and growth conditions Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh (Arabidopsis) wild types were ecotypes Columbia, Landsberg erecta (Ler, obtained from Lehle Seeds, Round Rock, Texas) and Ws (obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resources Centre, Ohio). The GI mutants used were gi-1 and gi -2 (Columbia ecotype, obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resources Centre, Ohio), gi -3 to gi -6 ( Ler ecotype, obtained from Maarten Koornneef, Wageningen, the Netherlands), gi-11 (T-DNA mutant allele in Ws ecotype; Richardson et al. 1998) and gi-12 (T-DNA mutant allele in Col ecotype, a gift from M. Aukerman and R. Amasino, University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin). The EARLY FLOWERING 3 (elf 3, Columbia ecotype), was obtained from the Arabidopsis Stock Centre and has been described previously (Zagotta et al. 1996). The LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL mutant (LHY, Ler ecotype) was described previously (Schaffer et al. 1998). Seed of transgenic plants over expressing the ORCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED (CCA1) gene (35S::CCA1) was a gift from Elaine Tobin (UCLA, California) and has been described previously (Wang and Tobin, 1998). Seeds were placed on moist filter paper at 4 °C for 3 days, planted in soil and germinated in growth cabinets. Plants were grown in Percival AR-32L cabinets providing either continuous light (LL), continuous dark (DD), short days (SD) of 10 h light / 14 h dark, or long days (LD) of 18 h light / 6 h dark unless otherwise noted. Light intensity of 150 - 170 μmol πr 2 s- 1 was provided by fluorescent tubes. Measurement of flowering time Flowering time analysis of gi alleles and wild type was carried out on plants grown in Gallenkamp cabinets either in SD (10 h light / 14 h dark) or in LD (lOh light + 8 hr day extension/ 6 h dark) as described in Putterill et al. 1995. Flowering time was measured by number of leaves when floral buds were visible at the centre of the rosette. Detection of mRNA by northern hybridisation analysis RNA was extracted from plant tissue as described in Stiekema et al. ( 1988). Total RNA ( lOμg) was electrophoresed on agarose gels and transferred to Boehringer Mannheim positively charged nylon membrane as described in Fourney et al. (1988). RNA was bound to the membrane using a UV Stratalinker (Stratagene) . The GI probe used in northern hybridisation analysis was a 1817 bp cDNA fragment from the 3' half of the GI cDNA (2235 - 4051 on GI cDNA). This probe is specific for the GI transcript as it does not detect any transcript in gi-11 mutant plants which carry a deletion of the 5' end of the gene and promoter. GI DNA probes were radio-labelled by priming with random octamers (Gibco BRL). The radio-labelled DNA was hybridised to the northern blot membranes in hybridisation buffer for 18 h at 65 °C and then washed at moderate stringency using two washes of 0.5 or 1 x SSC, 0.1 % SDS at 65 °C. The LHY probe used in northern hybridisation analysis was the full length LHY cDNA Genbank accession AJ006404. LHY DNA probes were radio-labelled and hybridised to northern blot membranes as described above. After northern hybridisation, nylon membranes were exposed to a Fujifϊlm BAS-MP imaging plate at room temperature. The image was visualised using a Fujifilm FLA- 2000 phosphorimager running Imagereader version 1.3E software. The expression levels were quantitated using the MacBAS version 2.5 program and background hybridisation levels subtracted. Expression levels were normalised against the signal obtained by hybridising the blot with an asparagus 25/26s rDNA probe. The normalised values were then expressed as a proportion of the highest value obtained and graphed. Detection of mRNA by RT-PCR First strand cDNA synthesis on 10 ug of total RNA was primed using the dTiγ adapter primer as described by Frohman et al. 1988. For CO detection, the first strand product was used in PCR containing a primer C053 5'-acgccatcagcgagttcc corresponding to position 295-311 bp located 295-311 bp downstream of the translation start of CO (Genbank) and co oli9 primer 5'-aaatgtatgc-gttatggttaatgg spanning the single intron of CO where the position of the intron is indicated by a -. The specificity of the PCR for CO sequences was analysed by including total RNA from the co-8 allele () which is deleted for the region encompassed by the primers amplified. No PCR products were detectable in the co-8 RT-PCR reaction unpublished results). Amplification of ubiquitin mRNA was used as a control to ensure that equal amounts of first strand cDNA were added to each PCR reaction. The primers used to amplify ubiquitin cDNA were UB01 5'-ctaccgtgatcaagatgcac and G702 (Frohman et al 1988). PCR was terminated while the amplification was occurring exponentially as previously described (Putterill et al. 1995). Amplification of CO was carried out for 25 cycles and of ubiquitin for 20 cycles. The PCR products were analysed by southern hybridisation using either a full length CO probe or an ubiquitin probe. Detection of GI protein by Western analysis Two GI peptide sequences were synthesised. These were T P K L P T T E K N G M N S P S Y R F F N at a peak of hydrophilicity at amino acid 1 106 (close to a strong SS- turn-predictor of potential B cell epitopes) and E R E L Q P W I A K D D E E G Q K M W K at amino acid 971. Effect of gi mutations on the predicted GI protein and on flowering time To confirm the molecular identity of the GI gene, the corresponding gene from six classical gi mutant alleles (gi-1 to gr -6) was sequenced. The gene was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of the mutant alleles in three overlapping fragments which were sequenced directly. Alterations in the predicted GI sequence were identified in all six alleles, confirming the identity of the GI gene. Four of the six gi mutant alleles are predicted to encode truncated GI proteins (Figure 15B). The most extreme of these is the X-ray induced gi-2 allele where an eight bp deletion (670-677 downstream of the ATG) causes a frameshift. This introduces a stop codon which shortens the predicted 1173 aa GI protein by 1029 amino acids. A transition (C to T, 2392 bp downstream of the ATG) in the EMS- induced gi-6 allele, results in a stop codon which truncates the predicted GI protein by 681 amino acids. The gi-3 allele is also EMS induced and has a C to T transition (3929 bp downstream of the ATG) causing a stop codon. This shortens the predicted GI protein 210 amino acids. A five bp deletion (4327-4331 bp downstream of the ATG) in the gi-1 allele (X-ray induced) causes a stop codon immediately downstream that results in truncation of the GI protein by 171 amino acids. Of the remaining two alleles, the EMS allele gi-4 has a mutation in the 3' splice acceptor site of intron 12 of the GI gene (4150 bp downstream of the ATG). The change from AG to AA is expected to result in aberrant splicing of intron 12 from the GI transcript. Finally, X-ray allele gi-5 has a point mutation and a single base deletion in exon 13 of the GI gene (5141 and 5042 bp downstream of the ATG). This causes a frameshift which is predicted to both change the last eight amino acids and add 27 amino acids to the carboxyl terminus of the GI protein (Figure 15B). To determine the functional importance of different domains of the GI protein, we compared the effect of the six classical gi mutant alleles (gi- 1 to gi-6) on Arabidopsis flowering time. The T-DNA mutant alleles (gi- 11 and grz-12) were also included in the experiment, gi- 11 was known to be a null mutation. The 5' half of the GI gene is deleted in gn ' -l l and no GI transcript was detected (S. Fowler and J. Putterill, unpublished results). The mutants and their corresponding wild type plants were grown in LD and SD conditions and scored for numbers of leaves visible at flowering (Figure 16). The flowering time experiment showed that the null allele gi- 1 1 delayed, but did not abolish flowering, indicating that the GI gene promotes flowering, but is not essential for it to occur. Of the classical alleles, the mutation with the most severe effect on the GI protein, gi-2 was the latest flowering while gi-4 (splice site mutation at the last intron exon boundary at the 3' end of the GI gene) was the earliest flowering. However, the differences in flowering time between these alleles were relatively slight strongly suggesting that the carboxyl terminus of the GI protein is functionally important in flowering. The gi mutations in the Ler and Ws ecotypes caused late flowering and flowered with much reduced daylength sensitivity compared to wild type plants, as previously reported for gi mutants (Redei, 1962; Koornneef et al. 1991, Araki and Komeda, 1993). However, the mutant plants all flowered slightly later than wild type in short days. This result is consistent with the main function of GI being to promote flowering in long days, but indicates that GI also has some role in flowering in short days in the experimental conditions. In addition, the severe gi-2 and gi-12 Col mutants responded quite strongly to daylength (Figure 16) which is inconsistent with previous reports where gi-2 was found to be daylength insensitive (Araki and Komeda, 1993). It is not clear what the reasons are for the differences in the results between the two experiments, but it may be due to light quality differences in growth conditions, gi mutants have previously been shown to have impaired light perception or response as they can have elongated hypocotyls compared to wild type in a range of light regimes (Araki and Komeda, 1993; K. Lee and G. Coupland, unpublished results) . GI transcript levels are regulated by the circadian clock and the transition to darkness To determine where and when in the plant GI might exert its effect on flowering, GI expression was analysed through development by northern hybridisation analysis. An initial experiment using northern blots with RNA extracted from plants harvested . at the beginning of the day failed to detect GI transcript. Subsequently, northern analysis of RNA extracted from plants collected through LD indicated that GI transcript levels cycled, with a peak of expression about half way through the light period (data not shown). In a second experiment, plant material was collected every 2 - 4 hours over a 24 hour period in LD. Northern hybridisation analysis confirmed that GI transcript levels cycled, with the highest level 10 h into the light (Zeitgeber 10, ZT 10) and the lowest level at the beginning of the day (ZT 0, Figure 17). To determine if the rhythmic cycling of GI transcript levels was under the control of the circadian clock, plants entrained in LD were transferred to continuous light photoperiods (LL) for 24 h and then assayed for GI expression every 4 - 8 over a 48 h period. Under LL, GI transcript levels continued to cycle indicating that they were controlled by the circadian clock (Figure 17). Plants were also transferred to continuous dark photoperiods (DD) and GI transcript levels analysed. In DD, GI transcript continued to cycle, but the amplitude was reduced and moderate GI expression was detected at all the timepoints analysed (data not shown). Transcript levels of the flowering time gene CO are lower in SD than in LD and this correlates with delayed flowering seen in SD in wild type plants. To determine if GI transcript levels were also lower in SD than in LD, plant material was collected every 2 - 4 hours over a 24 hour period in SD. Northern hybridisation analysis showed that GI transcript levels cycled in SD with the highest level 8 h into the light (ZT 8, Figure 17). The peak of GI expression in SD was 2 h earlier than in LD, but was a similar or higher level as in LD days. The rapid reduction in GI expression in SD coincided with the onset of darkness at ZT 10. Similar results were obtained in a second experiment (data not shown) . To test whether GI transcript levels were down-regulated by the transition to darkness in SD, plants growing in LD were exposed to darkness at ZT 10 and assayed every hour, for four more hours. GI transcript levels at ZT 11 in the plants in darkness were reduced to - half the level of control LD plants, indicating that they are regulated by the transition to darkness (Figure 17). Similar results were obtained in a second experiment (data not shown). This result raises the possibility that the timing of peak GI expression may be important for rapid flowering of wild type plants in LD. The early flowering Arabidopsis elf3 mutants show ectopic over expression of GI in long and short day photoperiods The effect of the elf 3 mutation on GI transcript levels in LD and SD was assayed every 4 h over a 24 h period (Figure 18). In elf3 mutants, unlike wild-type plants, GI transcript was detected at all timepoints analysed including the beginning of the light period (ZT 0) and after the transition to darkness in SD (ZT10). GI transcript levels were also higher in elf3 mutants than in wild type at all timepoints. GI transcript levels cycled in elf3 mutants in LD and SD, but with much reduced amplitude. This result indicates that early flowering of in SD correlates with the presence of GI transcript even after the transition to darkness. Effect of Arabidopsis circadian mutations on GI expression To further investigate how the circadian clock controls GI expression, the effect of three circadian genes from the long day on the free running rhythmn of GI expression was analysed, elf 3 and Ihy mutant plants and 35S::CCA1 transgenic plants were grown in LD, transferred to LL for 24 h and then assayed for GI expression every 4 - 8 h over a 48 h period. In elf3 and 35S::CCA1 plants in LL, the rhythmic pattern of GI expression was disrupted. GI was detected in at all the timepoints analysed and was present at higher levels in elf 3 mutants than in wild type (Figure 19). GI transcript levels fluctuated in elf3 mutant plants. This result indicated that the circadian rhythmn of GI expression in the light is regulated via elf 3 and CCA1. Surprisingly, in Ihy mutants, GI transcript levels continued to cycle in LL. This result indicated that circadian clock regulation of GI transcript levels occurs independently of the LHY gene. GI expression is the only circadian rhythmn tested to date that is not disrupted in Ihy plants. The GI mutation lowers the expression of two genes. LHY and CO. in the long day pathway The expression analysis described above showed that the LHY gene did not appear to regulate GI expression. Hence LHY expression in gi mutant plants in LD and SD was analysed. The gi mutation led to a 5 - 6 fold reduction in peak LHY transcript levels in LD. A similar result was obtained in gi mutants grown in SD. LHY transcript levels continued to cycle in LD and SD conditions in gi mutant plants as observed previously in wild -type plants (Schaffer et al. 1998). These expression results indicate that GI may lie upstream of the LHY gene in the long day pathway, rather than downstream as predicted by current models. The level of CO transcript correlates well with Arabidopsis flowering time. Plants grown in SD have lower levels of CO transcript than plants grown in LD (Putterill et al 1995) and ectopic over-expression of CO dramatically accelerates flowering in both LD and SD (Simon et al. 1996, Coupland, 1997). The level of CO expression in gi mutant plants was measured in LD every 4 h over a 24 h period by RT-PCR (Figure 20). The gi-3 mutation led to a 3 - 6 fold reduction in CO transcript levels at all timepoints analysed compared to wild type plants. This result suggests that GI may promote flowering in LD via up regulation of expression of the CO gene. GI is expressed throughout plant development The expression of GI transcript during plant development was analysed by northern hybridisation (Figure 21). Plants were grown in LD and samples were harvested 8 h into the light period (ZT 8). GI transcript was detected at all the stages of plant development tested, from seedlings at the two leaf stage to mature plants with developed siliques. GI transcript levels were analysed in individual organs and tissues from mature plants. GI was detected in all of the tissues tested, with the highest level of GI expression in inflorescence apices, young flowers and young siliques and the lowest level in mature siliques and roots. The tissues with maximal GI expression are undergoing cell division which may indicate that GI is concentrated in regions of cell proliferation. However, this remains to be confirmed by in situ hybridisation experiments. Discussion Positioning GI in the long day pathway to flowering in Arabidopsis Several genes in the Arabidopsis long day promotion pathway, including ELF3, LHY and CG4I affect both photoperiodic control of flowering and circadian clock function. The above work shows that the ELF3 gene, which is predicted to provide light input signals into the clock, and CCA1 which is likely to be part of the clock itself, are both required for circadian regulation of GI transcript levels. These results suggest that GI lies downstream of ELF3 and CCA1 in the long day pathway. In contrast, the Ihy mutation which abolishes several different circadian rhythmns in plants including clock controlled gene expression, does not influence circadian regulation of GI expression. This result indicates that LHY may not regulate long day flowering via GI as previously thought. Other evidence supports the idea that GI may be upstream of LHY in the long day pathway. The results herein show that LHY expression is greatly reduced in gi mutant background. However it is not yet clear how LHY transcript levels per se correspond to flowering time, as under-expression of LHY is associated both with late daylength-insensitive flowering in the gi mutant and early daylength-insensitive flowering in the elf 3 mutant (Schaffer et al. 1998). The results also show that the expression of the CO gene is reduced in the gi mutant background in LD. This confirms that GI is likely to lie upstream of the CO gene in the pathway and to promote flowering at least in part via up regulating the levels of CO activity. Possible role for the GI gene in photoperiodic flowering Our gene expression analyses position the GI gene in the Arabidopsis long day promotion pathway downstream of CCAland upstream of LHY and CO. GI appears to promote flowering in LD at least in part via up regulating CO expression. High ectopic expression of GI in elf 3 mutants and in 35S::GI transgenic plants causes early flowering. However, high GI expression does not always correlate with early flowering. For example, wild-type plants grown in SD have high levels of GI expression, yet still show delayed flowering. Hence, we think that the timing of GI expression during day night cycles may be important for flowering. For example, in SD, the transition to darkness (at ZT 10) is associated with a dramatic reduction in GI expression at subsequent timepoints, compared to plants grown in LD and this might be responsible for the delayed flowering seen in SD. It is possible that the GI gene may influence photoperiodic flowering by being part of the daylength signalling or response mechanism in Arabidopsis. Part C Construction of a plasmid to enable the over-expression of GI in plants and its introduction into Arabidopsis A GI cDNA was assembled from the fragments that were used for sequencing and are described in A above. The 5' region amplified with primers oli26 and oli2R was blunt-ended, cleaved with Hindlll and ligated into pGIT-GIN cleaved with Hindlll and Smal. The middle section of the cDNA, amplified with primers oli28 and oli30R, was ligated to Bluescript plasmid cleaved with Sad and Xbal. The 5' fragment and the middle fragment were then ligated together with the plant binary vector pGREEN in a three way ligation. The plasmid containing the 5' fragment was cleaved with Kpnl and Sad, the plasmid containing the middle fragment was cleaved with Sad and Xbal and pGREEN was cleaved with Kpnl and Xbal. The resulting plasmid contained the 5' fragment ligated to the middle fragment at the Sad site and this longer fragment inserted into pGREEN between the Kpnl and Xbal sites. The polyA sequence from the 35S gene of Cauliflower Mosaic Virus was inserted downstream of the GI cDNA fragment. The 3' clone amplified with oli29 and oli7R was cleaved with Spel and Smal and cloned into Bluescript. This fragment was then removed as a Spel-EcoRI fragment and inserted into the GI cDNA plasmid cleaved with Xbal and EcoRI. The final plasmid contains the GI cDNA encoding the entire GI protein between the 35S promoter and the 35S poly A sequence in the binary vector pGREEN that carries a kanamycin resistance gene. This plasmid was used to introduce the 35S: GI fusion into Arabidopsis plants using the transformation method of Clough and Bent (1998) (Plant Journal, Vol 16, pp. 735-743). Effect of over-expression of the GI gene in Arabidopsis The pGREEN vector carrying 35S: GI described in the previous section was used for transformation of Arabidopsis plants. The GI transgene was introduced into Arabidopsis plants by infiltrating plants with the Agrobacterium culture. Both wild- types and gi-3 mutants were used in the transformation. The progeny of infiltrated plants were germinated on kanamycin- containing medium and resistant plants selected. These transformed T 1 plants were scored for flowering time by counting the number of leaves they produced before flowering. Control wild-type plants formed 10-12 leaves under these conditions. Thirty Tl wild-type plants into which 35S: GI had been introduced were scored. They produced the following flowering times: No. of transformants Leaf No. 4 7 10 8 5 9 3 10 8 More than 10 A proportion of these transformants (for example those forming only 7 or 8 leaves) flowered significantly earlier than wild- type plants (10- 12 leaves), indicating that over-expression of Glean promote early flowering. Thirty-six transformants were also made in the gi-3 mutant background. These flowered with the following leaf numbers: No. of transformants Leaf No. 4 7 10 8 8 9 2 10 12 More than 10 This indicates that over-expression of the GI cDNA can complement the GI mutation, and therefore that the cDNA described is functional. Furthermore, it again demonstrates that over-expression of the cDNA causes even earlier flowering than that of wild-type plants in a proportion of transformants, and therefore that GI over- expression can be used to manipulate flowering time. Introduction of Plasmid into Plants other than Arabidopsis The pGREEN vector described above is introduced into the following crops employing the following techniques: Oil seed rape Agrobacterium-mediated transformation using the approach of aza et αl (1997) Cαnolα Agrobacterium-mediated transformation using the approach of Kazan et αl (1997) Rice Particle gun (biolistics) approach of Christou et αl (1991) or Agrobacterium- mediated transfer as described by Hiei et αl (1994). INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION Thus, the present invention provides, for the first time, isolated nucleic acid encoding polypeptides having GI function. This in turn leads to numerous applications in practice, primarily in the manipulation of flowering and/ or starch accumulation in plants. Specific applications of the invention in manipulating flowering are as follows: Promotion of GI activity to cause early flowering. Mutations that reduce GI activity cause late flowering under inductive long day conditions, indicating GI involvement in promoting flowering under long days. This suggests that flowering could be manipulated by using foreign promoters to alter the expression of the gene. Causing early flowering under non-inductive conditions. Manipulation of GI transcript levels under non-inductive conditions may lead to early, or regulated, flowering. Promoter fusions enable expression of GI mRNA at a higher level than that found in wild-type plants under non-inductive conditions. Use of CaMV35S or meri 5 fusions should lead to early flowering while use of GSTII fusions should lead to regulated flowering. Causing early flowering under inductive conditions. The level of the GI product may be increased by introduction of promoter, eg CaMV35S or meri 5, fusions. Inducible promoters, such as GSTII, may be used to regulate flowering, eg by first creating a GI mutant of a particular species and then introducing an inducible promoter- GI fusion capable of complementation of the mutation in a regulated fashion. Inhibition of GI activity to cause late flowering. gi mutations cause late flowering of Arabidopsis. Transgenic approaches may be used to reduce GI activity and thereby delay or prevent flowering in a range of plant species. A variety of strategies may be employed. Expression of sense or anti-sense RNAs. In several cases the activity of endogenous plant genes has been reduced by the expression of homologous antisense RNA from a transgene, as discussed above. Similarly, the expression of sense transcripts from a transgene may reduce the activity of the corresponding endogenous copy of the gene, as discussed above. Expression of a GI antisense or sense RNA should reduce activity of the endogenous gene and cause late flowering. Expression of modified versions of the GI protein In the case of GI modification of the gene in vitro and expression of modified versions of the protein may lead to dominant inhibition of the endogenous, intact protein and thereby delay flowering. This may be accomplished in various ways, including the following: Specific applications of the invention in manipulating starch are as follows: Promotion of starch accumulation and/ or characteristics A similar approach to control and expression of the GI gene in plants can be taken where promotion of starch accumulation in photosynthetically active tissues (such as the leaves) of a transgenic plant is the intended result. The higher accumulation of starch in gi mutants may have commercial opportunities. For example, GI could be used to inactivate the gene in other species, with, for example, anti sense or co-suppression technologies. This may then cause starch to accumulate in plant species with large leaves, making it easier to harvest the starch. By introducing other transgenes it may also be possible to manipulate the chemistry of the starch, to make forms which are of high commercial value. Increasing forage value Another aspect of increasing the starch content of leaves is that it may enhance the energy value of animal forage eg pasture grasses, forage maize, alfalfa, etc). When carbohydrate (energy) is provided as starch it is more stable than as the water soluble carbohydrates. These water soluble carbohydrates may necessitate drying or may wash through in an ensiling process. Furthermore, the resulting fresh forage requires less handling and other input (eg drying) . Other implications and applications of the invention will be apparent to those persons skilled in the art. It will also be appreciated that the invention is not limited by the specific description provided, but instead that modifications may be made (eg. in terms of vector systems, transformation protocols, plant promoters, etc.) without departing from the scope of protection. REFERENCES Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers E. W. and Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic alignment search tool. J. Mol Biol 215:403-410. Araki, T., Kobayashi, Y., Kaya, H. and Iwabuchi, M. (1998). The flowering-time gene FT and regulation of flowering in Arabidopsis. J. Plant Res., Il l, 277-281. Araki, T. and Komeda, Y. (1993). Analysis of the role of the late flowering locus, GI, in the flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant J. 3:231-239. Bechtold, N., Ellis, J. and Pelletier G. (1993) In planta Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer by infiltration of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Comptes Rendus des seances de V Acadamie des Sciences. Sciences de la vie 316: 1 194- 1199. Benfey et al, EMBO J 9: 1677- 1684 (1990a). Benfey et ah, EMBO J 9: 1685- 1696 (1990b). Bouchez, D., Camilleri, C, and Caboche M. (1993). A binary vector based on Basta reistance for in planta transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana Comptes Rendus des seances de V Acadamie des Sciences. Sciences de la vie 316: 1188- 1193. Christou, P., Ford, T. L., Kofron, M. (1991). Production of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants from agronomically important indica and japonica varieties via electric discharge particle acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos. Bio/technology 9:957-962. Colasanti, J. and Sundaresan, V. (1997). Long distance signals for flowering: genetic evidence that the maize INDETERMINATE gene regulates a floral stimulus. Flowering Newsletter, 24, 4-9. Coupland, G. (1997). Regulation of flowering by photoperiod in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ., 20, 785-789. Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L. (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13- 14. Eimert, K., Wang, S-M., Lue, W-L., Cheng, J. (1995) Monogenic recessive mutation cause both late floral initiation and excess starch accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 7: 1703- 1712. Fourney, R.M., Miyakoshi, J., Day, R.S. and Paterson, M.C. (1998) Northern blotting: efficient RNA staining and transfer. Focus, 10, 5-7. Frohman, M.A., Dush, M.K. and Martin, G.R. (1988) Rapid production of full- length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 85, 8998-9002. Guo, H., Yang, H., Mockler, T.C. and Lin, C. (1998) Regulation of flowering time by Arabidopsis photoreceptors. Science, 279, 1360- 1363. Hicks, K.A., Millar, A.J., Carre, I.A., Somers, D.E., Straume, M., Meeks Wagner, D.R. and Kay, S.A. (1996) Conditional circadian dysfunction of the Arabidopsis early-flowering 3 mutant. Science, 274, 790-792. Hiei, Y., Ohta, S., Komari, T. and Kumashiro, T. (1994). Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrocbacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J. 6:271-282. Hollis, CA. (1999) Characterising GIGANTEA; an Arabidopsis gene that regulates flowering-time. University of Auckland. Holsters, M., de Waele, D., Depicker, A., Messens, E., Van Montagu, M., and Schell, J. (1978) Transfection and transformation of A. tumefaciens. Molecular and General Genetics 163: 181- 187. Johnson, E., Bradley, M., Harberd, N.P. and Whitelam, G.C. (1994) Photoresponses of light-grown phyA mutants of Arabidopsis:: Phytochrome A is required for the perception of daylength extensions. Plant PhysioL, 105, 141- 149. Kazan, K., Curtis, M.D., Goulter, K. C, Manners, J. M. (1997). Agrobacterium tumefaciens - mediated transformation of double haploid canola (Brassica napus) lines. Aust. J. Plant PhysioL 24:97- 102. Kieber, J.J., Rothenberg, M., Roman, G., Feldmann, K.A. and Ecker, J.R. (1993) CTR1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis, encodes a member of the Raf family of protein kinases. Cell, 72, 427-441. Koncz, C. and Schell, J. (1986). The promoter of T-L DNA Gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Molecular and General Genetics 204:383-396. Koornneef, M., Alonso-Blanco, C, Blankestijn-de Vries, H., Hanhare, C.J. and Peeters, A.J.M. (1998b) Genetic interactions among late-flowering mutants of Arabidopsis. Genetics, 148. Koornneef, M., Alonso-Blanco, C, Peeters, A.J.M. and Soppe, W. (1998a) Genetic control of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol, 49, 345-370. Koornneef, M., Hanhart, C.J. and van der Veen, J.H. (1991). A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular and General Genetics 229:57-66. Kurepa, J., Smalle, J., Van Montagu, M. and Inez, D. (1998) Oxidative stress tolerance and longevity in Arabidopsis: the late-flowering mutant gigantea is tolerant to paraquat. Plant J., 14, 759-764. Levy, Y.L. and Dean, C. (1998) The transition to flowering. Plant Cell, 10, 1973- 1990. Lin, C, Ahmad, M., Chan, A.R. and Cashmore, A.R. (1996) CRY2: a second member of the Arabidopsis cryptochrome family. Plant Physiol, 110, 1047-. Logemann, J., Schell, J and Willmitzer, L. (1987). Improved method for isolation of RNA from plant tissues. Anal. Biochem. 141, 329-336. Long, D., Martin, M., Sundber, E., Swinburne, J., Puangsomlee, P. and Coupland, G. ( 1993) The maize transposable element system Ac/Ds as a mutagen in arabidopsis: Identification of an albino mutation induced by Ds insertion. Proc. Nati. Acad Sci. USA 90: 10370- 10374. Medford, J. I. (1992). Vegetative Apical Meristens. Plant Cell 4, 1029- 1039. Medford et al, (1991). Plant Cell 3, 359-370. Medford, J. I., Behringer, F. J., Callos, J. D., Feldmann, K. A. Normal and abnormal development in the Arabidopsis vegetative shoot apex. Plant Cell 4 (6) (1992) 631-543. Millar, A.J. and Kay, S.A. (1996) Integration of circadian and phototransduction pathways in the network controlling CAB transcription in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad, Sci. USA, 93, 15491- 15496. Nakai, K. and Kanehisa, M. ( 1992) A knowledge base for predicting protein localisation sites in eukaryotic cells. Genomics, 14. Napoli et al., (1990). The Plant Cell 2, 279-289. Newman, T., Bruijin, F.J.d., Green, P., Keegstra, K., Kende, H., Mclntosh, L., Ohlrogge, J., Raikhel, N., Somerville, S., Thomashow, M., Retzel, E. and Somerville, C. (1994) A summary of methods for accessing results from large-scale partial sequencing of anonymous Arabidopsis cDNAs. Plant Physiol, 106, 1241- 1255. Nilsson, O., Lee, I., Blazquez, M.A. and Weigel, D. ( 1998) Flowering-time genes modulate the response to LEAFY activity. Genetics, 150, 403-410. Pineiro, M. and Coupland, G. (1998) The control of flowering time and floral identity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. , 36, 517-568. Putterill, J., Robson, F., Lee, K., Simon, R. and Coupland, G. (1995) The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors. Cell, 80, 847-857. Redei, G.P. (1962) Supervital mutants of Arabidopsis. Genetics, 47, 443-460. Richardson, K., Fowler, S., Pullen, C, Skelton, C, Morris, B. and Putterill, J. (1998) T-DNA tagging of a flowering-time gene and improved gene transfer by in planta transformation of Arabidopsis. Aust J. Plant Physiol, 25, 125- 130. Rothstein et al., (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:8439-8443. Sambrook et al., (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbour, N Y. : Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory). Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. and Coulsen, A.R. (1977). DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA. 74:5463-5467. Saunders, D.S. (1977) An Introduction to Biological Rhythms. Blackie and Son Limited, Glasgow and London. Schaffer, R. (1997) LHY, a gene that regulates flowering and hypocotyl elongation of Arabidopsis. PhD thesis . University of East Anglia. Schaffer, R., Ramsay, N., Samach, A., Corden, S., Putterill, J., Carre, I. and Coupland, G. (1998) The late elongated hypocotyl mutation of Arabidopsis disrupts circadian rhythms and the photoperiodic control of flowering. Cell, 93, 1219- 1229. Simon, R., Igeno, M.I. and Coupland, G. (1996) Activation of floral meristem identity genes in Arabidopsis. Nature, 384, 59-62. Smith et al., (1988) Nature 334:724-726. Somers, D.E., Webb, A.A.R., Pearson, M. and Kay, S.A. (1998) The short-period mutant, tocl-1, alters circadian clock regulation of multiple outputs throughout development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development, 125, 485-494. Southern, E. M. ( 1975). Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electorphoresis. J. Mol. Biol. 98:503-517 Stiekema, W.J., Heidekamp, F., Dirkse, W.G., van Beckum, J., de Haan, P., Ten Bosch, C. and Louwerse, J.D. (1998) Molecular cloning and analysis of four potato tuber RNAs. Plant Mol Biol, 11, 255-269. Terryn, N., Neyt, P., De Clercq, R., De Keyser, A., Van Den Daele, H., Ardiles, W., Dehais, P., Rouze, P., Gielen, J., Villarroel, R. and Montafu, M.V. (1997) Sequence analysis of a 24-kb contiguous genomic region at the Arabidopsis thaliana PFL locus on chromosome 1. FEBS Let, 416, 156- 160. van der Krol et al., (1990) The Plant Cell 2:291-299. Vincent, J. ( 1985) A manual for the practical study of root nodule bacteria. ISP Handbook No. 15. Von Heijne, G. (1992) Membrane protein structure prediction, hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. J. Mol Biol, 225. Voytas, D.F., Konieczny, A., Cummings, M.P. and Ausubel, F.M. (1990) The structure, distribution and evolution of the Tal retro transposable element family of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics, 126, 713-722. Wang, Z.Y. and Tobin, E.M. (1998) Constitutive expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED (CCA1) gene disrupts circadian rhythms and suppresses its own expression. Cell, 93, 1-20. Weigel et al., (1992) Cell 69:843-859. Weller, J.L., Reid, J.B., Taylor, S.A. and Murfet, I.C. (1997) The genetic control of flowering in pea. Trend Plant Sci., 2, 412-418. Zagotta, M.T., Hicks, K.A., Jacobs, C, Young, J.C., Harngarter, R.P. and Meeks- Wagner, D.R. (1996) The Arabidopsis ELF3 gene regulates vegetative photomorphogenesis and the photoperiodic induction of flowering. Plant J., 10, 691- 702. Zhang et al., (1992) The Plant Cell 4: 1575- 1588.

Claims: WHAT WE CLAIM IS: 1. A nucleic acid isolate comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide with GI function. 2. Nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 wherein said nucleotide sequence is that of the GI gene of Arabidopsis thaliana or a GI homologue from another plant species, or a variant of the gene or homologue. 3. Nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 wherein said GI nucleotide sequence includes the nucleotides shown in Figure 4 A or 4B. 4. Nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 which comprises, or includes, the nucleotide sequence shown in Figure 5, or a variant thereof. 5. Nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 which encodes all or part of the amino acid sequence of Figure 6 or which encodes a variant thereof. 6. Nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 which comprises, or includes, the nucleotide sequence shown in Figure 8, or a variant thereof. 7. Nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 which encodes all or part of the amino acid sequence of Figure 9, or which encodes a variant thereof. 8. Nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 which comprises, or includes, the nucleotide sequence of Figure 11, or a variant thereof. 9. Nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 which encodes all or part of the amino acid sequence of Figure 12, or which encodes a variant thereof. 10. A nucleic acid isolate comprising a nucleotide sequence complementary to a nucleotide sequence as claimed in claim 1. 11. A nucleic acid sequence complementary to a nucleic acid isolate comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide having GI function wherein the said complementary nucleic acid sequence is capable of hybridising to the said nucleic acid isolate under hybridisation conditions. 12. A nucleic acid isolate comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide having GI function complementary to a nucleic acid sequence wherein the said nucleic acid isolate is capable of hybridising to the said nucleic acid sequence under hybridisation conditions. 13. Nucleic acid as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12 further comprising a regulatory sequence for sense transcription of said nucleotide sequence. 14. Nucleic acid as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12 further comprising a regulatory sequence for anti- sense transcription of said nucleotide sequence. 15. A nucleic acid vector suitable for transformation of a plant cell which comprises nucleic acid as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 14. 16. A plant cell transformed with nucleic acid as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 14. 17. A plant cell transformed with nucleic acid as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 14 comprised in a plant. 18. A plant comprising plant cells as claimed in claim 16 or claim 17. 19. Selfed or hybrid progeny or a descendant of a plant as claimed in claim 18, or any part or propagule of such a plant, progeny or descendant. 20. A method of influencing a flowering characteristic of a plant, the method comprising causing or allowing expression of the polypeptide encoded by nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 within cells of the plant. 21. A method of influencing a flowering characteristic of a plant, the method comprising causing or allowing transcription from nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 within cells of the plant. 22. A method of influencing a flowering characteristic of a plant, the method comprising causing or allowing transcription from nucleic acid as claimed in claim 14 within cells of the plant. 23. A method of promoting starch accumulation in the photosynthetically-active tissues of a transgenic plant, the method comprising causing or allowing expression of the polypeptide encoded by nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 within the plant. 24. A method of promoting starch accumulation in the photosynthetically-active tissues of a transgenic plant, the method comprising causing or allowing transcription from nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 within the plant. 25. A method of promoting starch accumulation in the photosynthetically- active tissues of a transgenic plant, the method comprising causing or allowing transcription from nucleic acid as claimed in claim 14 within cells of the plant. 26. A method of identifying and/ or cloning a GI homologue from a plant species other than Arabidopsis thaliana which method employs a nucleotide sequence derived from or based upon that shown in Figures 4A, 4B, 5 or 8. 27. A method of identifying and/ or cloning a GI homologue from a plant species other than rice which method employs a nucleotide sequence derived from or based upon that shown in Figure 11.

Inventors: COUPLAND GEORGE MICHAEL, FOWLER SARAH GEORGE, PUTTERILL JOANNA JEAN, COUPLAND, GEORGE, MICHAEL, FOWLER, SARAH, GEORGE, PUTTERILL, JOANNA, JEAN
Applicants: COUPLAND GEORGE MICHAEL, FOWLER SARAH GEORGE, PLANT BIOSCIENCE LTD, PUTTERILL JOANNA JEAN, COUPLAND, GEORGE, MICHAEL, FOWLER, SARAH, GEORGE, PLANT BIOSCIENCE LIMITED, PUTTERILL, JOANNA, JEAN
Application year: 1999
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: C07K14, C12N15