INHIBITORS OF NUCLEAR PROTEIN/NUCLEAR RECEPTOR INTERACTION

Abstract: A method for identifying inhibitor compounds capable of reducing the interaction between a first region which is a signature motif on a nuclear protein, and a second region which is that part of a nuclear receptor which is capable of interacting with the nuclear protein through binding to the signature motif, wherein: the nuclear protein is a bridging factor that is responsible for the interaction between a liganded nuclear receptor and a transcription initiation complex involved in regulation of gene expression; the nuclear receptor is a transcription factor, the signature motif is a short sequence of amino acid residues which is the key structural element of a nuclear protein which binds to a liganded nuclear receptor as part of the process of the activation or repression of target genes.

Description: INHIBITORS OF NUCLEAR PROTEIN : NUCLEAR RECEPTOR INTERACTION The present invention relates to inhibition of the interaction between nuclear proteins and nuclear receptors through identification of the key structural element responsible for the interaction. The binding of lipophilic hormones, retinoids and vitamins to members of the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily (to form "Iiganded" receptors) modifies their DNA binding and transcriptional properties, resulting in the activation or repression of target genes '- 2 . Ligand binding induces conformational changes in NRs and promotes their association with a diverse group of nuclear proteins, including SRC-l/pl60 3.4.5, τ_F2 6. and CBP/p300 4.5.8.9 which function as coactivators. and RIP- 140 A TIFl > ' and TRIPl/SUGl 12. 13 whose functions are unclear. The recruitment of nuclear proteins (coactivators and/or other so-called bridging proteins) by NRs is thought to be essential to their function as ligand-induced transcription factors. Structural studies of the ligand binding domains (LBDs) of three different nuclear hormone receptors, the retinoid X receptor α (RXRα) A the retinoic acid receptor γ (RARγ) •6 and the thyroid hormone receptor β (TRβ) A have led to the proposal that binding of ligand results in a realignment of a conserved amphipathic -helix, Helix 12 (HI 2), generating a novel surface required for coactivator binding and consequently activator function 2 (AF2)-dependent transactivation. Consistent with this, mutations of conserved hydrophobic residues in HI 2 which impair AF2 14 - 18-20. also interfere with the ability of NRs to bind coactivators 4.6.10.1 l.π. Less is known about the coactivator sequences which mediate interaction with NRs although several proteins appear to contain multiple NR binding sites 5.8.21. Le Douarin et al (1996) in EMBO Journal, J_5, 6701-6715. identified a leucine rich region in three coactivators (TIFl, RIP140 & TRIP3) which they called the "NR box' " ; see Figure 3D therein. However the present state of knowledge is completely silent about precisely how Iiganded nuclear receptors interact with nuclear proteins as a class to modify their DNA binding and transcriptional properties, resulting in the activation or repression of target genes. Indeed a commentator on the field stated, after the first filing date of the present invention, that ''characterizing the mechanisms by which nuclear factors engage the transcriptional apparatus in response to hormonal stimulation has seemed, at times, to be an insurmountable task' ' ' (Marc Montminy in Nature. 12 th June, 1997, 387. 654-655. see l sl paragraph thereof). The present invention is based on the discovery that a short signature motif present in the nuclear proteins is necessary and sufficient to mediate their binding to Iiganded NRs. According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for identifying inhibitor compounds capable of reducing the interaction between: a) a first region which is a signature motif on a nuclear protein, and b) a second region which is that part of a nuclear receptor which is capable of interacting with the nuclear protein through binding to the signature motif, wherein: the nuclear protein is a bridging factor that is responsible for the interaction between a Iiganded nuclear receptor and a transcription initiation complex involved in regulation of gene expression; the nuclear receptor is a transcription factor; the signature motif is a short sequence of amino acid residues which is the key structural element of a nuclear protein which binds to a Iiganded nuclear receptor as part of the process of the activation or repression of target genes; and in which the method comprises taking: i) the potential inhibitor compound; ii) the Iiganded nuclear receptor or a fragment thereof in which the fragment comprises the second region defined in this claim in b) above; iii) a nuclear protein fragment comprising a signature motif of the nuclear protein; and iv) detecting the presence or absence of inhibition of the interaction between ii) and iii). The term "nuclear protein" means the bridging factors (including coactivators) that are responsible for the interaction between a Iiganded nuclear receptor and the transcription initiation complex involved in regulation of gene expression (reviewed for steroid hormone receptors in Beato, M., Herrlich, P. & Schutz, G. Cell 83, 851-857 (1995)). The term bridging factor may include part of the transcription initiation complex itself. The term "nuclear receptor" means the family of nuclear receptors such as described in Mangelsdorf, D.J., et al. Cell 83, 835-839 (1995). The term "signature motif means a short sequence of generally at least about 5 amino acids, preferably 4-10, more preferably 5-10 amino acid residues which is the key structural element of a nuclear protein which binds to a Iiganded nuclear receptor as part of the process of the activation or repression of target genes. The term "Iiganded nuclear receptor" means an activated nuclear receptor, for example, with ligand bound thereto. The ligand can take various forms such as for example a hormone, a small molecule compound or a peptide. For example, in the case of some of the nuclear receptors (e.g. PPAR) there are non hormonal peptide ligands e.g. leukotrienes. Although nuclear receptors are generally activated through ligand binding, some receptors, such as for example orphan receptors, may be active without the need for ligand and/ or activated through non- ligand dependent pathways and these receptors are also within the scope of the invention as a less preferred embodiment. The term "fragment" means an incomplete part. Before the present invention, a skilled person could not have known which fragment or fragments of a nuclear protein could be taken to retain activity. Use of fragments compared with whole proteins is particularly advantageous in screening assays. In a preferred embodiment a preferred fragment size of a nuclear protein is 8-10 amino acids, such as, for example, shown in Figure 1A herein. The Iiganded nuclear receptor is preferably in the form of a fragment. In general, fragments comprise at least 8 amino acids. Preferably the signature motif is represented by B'XXLL in which Bi is any natural hydrophobic amino acid, L is leucine and X represents any natural amino acid. Values for X within the signature motif are independently selected i.e. X may be the same or different. Preferably B' is leucine or valine with leucine being most preferred. In some instances the preferred signature motif is further defined as B 2 B'XXLL wherein "B 2 " is a hydrophobic amino acid residue as defined for B«. A "natural hydrophobic amino acid" is defined as any one of isoleucine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, tyrosine or valine. Preferably the signature motif is in the conformation of a helix, preferably an amphipathic helix, and the leucine residues form a hydrophobic face thereof. Preferably the signature motif is positioned within a molecule so that it is available at the surface thereof for interaction with proteins. Preferably values of X do not include Cys or Pro. Preferably at least one value of X is not a natural hydrophobic amino acid or proline. One value of X is preferably independently selected from Arg, Asn, Asp, Glu, Gin, His, Lys, Ser, Thr, Gly or Ala, more preferably one value of X is independently selected from Arg, Asn, Asp, Glu, Gin, His or Lys. Without wishing to be bound by theoretical considerations, it is believed that preferred values of X favour the signature motif forming an amphipathic helix. After the first filing date of the present invention there was a simultaneous publication of the identification of LXXLL motifs by two groups (one of which included the inventors of the present invention), namely Heery et al. Nature, 12 th June 1997, 387, 733-736 & Torchia et al, Nature. 12 ,h June 1997, 387, 677-684. Herein we show that the ability of a nuclear protein (SRC1) to bind a nuclear receptor (Iiganded ER) and enhance its transcriptional activity is dependent upon the integrity within the nuclear protein of the signature motif (LXXLL; SEQ ID NO: 1), as well as key hydrophobic residues in the conserved helix (Helix 12) of NRs required for their ligand- induced activation function (AF-2) A The signature motif is also found in TIFl, TIF2, p300, RIP 140 and the TRIP proteins, and occurs within regions of these proteins known to be sufficient for interaction with NRs. Thus the LXXLL motif (SEQ ID NO: 1) is a signature sequence which facilitates the interaction of diverse proteins with nuclear receptors, and thus is a key part of a new family of nuclear proteins. A preferred nuclear protein is a coactivator, in particular the nuclear protein includes any one of RIP 140, SRC-1, TIF2, CBP, p300, TIFl, Tripl, Trip2, Trip3, Trip4, Trip5, Trip8 or Trip9. Further preferred nuclear proteins include p/CIP, ARA70 & Trip230. In this specification a reference to a nuclear protein or nuclear receptor includes isoforms thereof unless stated or otherwise implicit from the context. An isoform is one of a family or collection of related proteins derived from a single gene. Thus isoforms may differ slightly in their amino acid sequences such as for example from differential splicing of exons following transcription. SRC 1 a is an example of an isoform of SRC 1. Two isoforms of SRC- 1, namely SRC la and SRCle, have been shown to contain differences in number of signature motifs and to be functionally distinct in so far as they appear to play different roles in ER- mediated transcription (Kalkhoven et al, 1998, EMBO Journal, 17, 232-243). Nuclear receptors are transcription factors. A preferred transcription factor comprises at least part of a conserved amphipathic α-helix, and especially preferred is retinoic acid receptor or a steroid hormone receptor. Preferred steroid hormone receptors are oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor with oestrogen receptor being especially preferred. Preferably the second region comprises at least part of a conserved amphipathic - helix such as for example Helix 12 in the oestrogen receptor which is especially preferred. An especially preferred combination of nuclear receptor and nuclear protein is one in which the nuclear receptor is oestrogen receptor and the nuclear protein is selected from SRC1, TIF2, CBP and p300, with SRC1 and especially SRC la being most preferred. A preferred method is in the form of a 2-hybrid assay system. Such assay systems are well known in the art; suitable references include Fields & Sternglanz (1994) TIG. August 1994, 10, 286-292 and US patent 5283173. Any suitable assay design may be employed such as for example radioisotopic assay, scintillation proximity assay (reviewed by ND Cook, 1996, Drug Discovery Today, 1, 287- 294) or fluorescence, particularly time resolved fluorescence, assay (reviewed by MV Rogers, 1997, Drug Discovery Today, 2, 156-160). High-throughput screeening technologies have been reviewed by Houston & Banks in Current Opinion in Biotechnology 1997, 8, 734-740. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the potential inhibitor is in the form of a peptide library based on a signature motif. Encoded peptide libraries generally have a maximum of 20 possible amino acids at any one position. In practice, using current technology, it is difficult to screen libraries of more than 10 7 - 10 8 members, which means that it is difficult to randomise more than 6 positions in a peptide. Hence, narrowing down the nuclear protein binding region to a signal motif is of great advantage if a peptide library approach is to be employed. A peptide library is a collection of peptides of varying sequences. There are in general two ways to generate peptide libraries (reviewed by Scott, 1992; Birnbaum and Mosbach, 1992; Houghten, 1993;see also Abelson, 1996). The first approach is to generate libraries in which positive peptides are identified through the sequencing of the peptides themselves. Mixtures of peptides may be chemically synthesised in such a way that the peptides are linked to beads, so that each bead contains only one peptide. If a bead is identified which contains a positive peptide, the bead may be recovered and the peptide identified by chemical sequencing. This approach was first demonstrated using the ability of antibodies to identify specific six amino acid peptides from mixtures (Lam et al, 1991). The importance of using beads is that the identification event (in this case the antibody:peptide interaction) leads to the recovery of a bead which contains more peptide than that bound by the antibody itself. In a related approach mixtures of free peptides can be synthesised and screened in pools; by using a deconvolution process, positive peptides are identified (Houghten et al, 1991). The second approach is to generate libraries in which positive peptides are identified by sequencing a molecule which is associated in some way with the peptide. Peptides and some other molecule, such as a nucleic acid, can be cosynthesised on beads, so that each nucleic acid "tags" the peptide found on the same bead. If a bead is identified which is positive, sequencing the nucleic acid will identify the peptide on this bead (Brenner and Lerner, 1992). Alternatively, peptide libraries can be generated using the gene expression machinery of living organisms. In this approach, it is not necessary to make a library of peptide molecules. Instead a library of DNA molecules is constructed, so that each molecule encodes a peptide with a different sequence. This encoded library must then be expressed in a suitable host organism in order that the peptide library be produced. The library is then screened. It is essential that the nucleic acid which encodes the library remain physically linked to the protein in some way, so that recovery, or identification, of the active peptides leads to recovery of the DNA which encodes these peptides. The sequences of the active peptides may then be deduced by sequencing of the DNA which encodes them. Several variations of this approach have been described. The mostly widely used version of this approach is to express peptides as part of the coat proteins of a virus such as Ml 3. The viruses can be screened by the ability of this coat protein to bind target proteins (such as antibodies (Devlin et al, 1990; Scott and Smith, 1990; Cwirla et al, 1990) or receptors (the atrial natriuretic peptide receptor: Cunningham et al (1994) and the thrombopoietin receptor (Cwirla et al, 1997). The approach may also be used to find protease inhibitors through their ability to bind to proteases (Roberts et al, 1992; Markland et al, 1996) as well as to find optimal substrates for proteases, such as stromelysin and matrilysin (Smith et al, 1995) and subtilisin (Matthews and Wells, 1993) An intracellular approach to the generation of peptides that recognise certain proteins is to use the yeast two-hybrid system. In the two-hybrid system, interacting proteins are fused to domains of transcription factors. If a proteimprotein interaction occurs, then transcription of a reporter gene is stimulated (Fields and Song, 1989). By making one component of the two hybrid system a peptide library, and selecting for cells in which reporter gene output occurs, it is possible to isolate peptides which bind to a target protein, this approach was used to identify peptides which bound to the retinoblastoma protein (Yang et al, 1995). In a similar approach, Colas et al (1996) expressed the peptide library as a loop in the surface of the E. coli TrxA protein and isolated peptides which bound to cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2). According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of 5 reducing the interaction between a) a first region which is a signature motif on a nuclear protein, and b) a second region which is that part of a nuclear receptor which is capable of interacting with the nuclear protein through binding to the signature motif, in which the method comprises adding an inhibitor in the presence of the nuclear receptor and 10 the nuclear protein, the inhibitor being characterised in that it reduces the interaction between the first region of the nuclear protein and the second region of the nuclear receptor. According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a novel inhibitor as described above. Preferably the inhibitor is a peptide, more preferably a peptide comprising the signature motif defined above, and more preferably the peptide has less than 15 15 amino acid residues. Especially preferred inhibitors are any one of the following peptides; PQAQQKSLLQQLLT (SEQ ID NO: 2), KLVQLLTTT (SEQ ID NO: 3), ILHRLLQE (SEQ ID NO: 4), or LLQQLLTE (SEQ ID NO: 5). Peptides may be prepared using conventional techniques for example using solid phase synthesis and Fmoc chemistry. These peptides are expected to be useful in the treatment of oestrogen responsive tumours. Inhibitors of the 0 invention are expected to be useful in the treatment of any disease mediated through interaction between a signature motif on a nuclear protein and a nuclear receptor. For example, suitable inhibitors are expected to be useful in treatment of cancer or inflammation. A novel inhibitor, for example, could be an antibody against a signature motif or a novel small molecule which binds to the signature motif or its complementary binding target 5 (nuclear receptor second region) such that normal biological activity is prevented. Examples of small molecules include but are not limited to small peptides or pepti de-like molecules. Whilst the signature motif is demonstrated herein to apply across nuclear proteins as a class it is expected that different nuclear receptors display both coactivator and signature motif preferences that contribute to specificity of hormonal response (Ding et al, 1998, 30 Molecular Endocrinology, J_2. 302-313) which in turn points to selective pharmaceutical intervention opportunities. Figures 1 A and 5 below also indicate that individual motifs may differ in the strength to which they bind to nuclear receptors. Note the NR box of Le Douarin et al (discussed above) did not disclose a signature motif within the meaning of the present invention because, for example, the NR box within the meaning of Le Douarin would be present in at most only 4 of the 39 signature motifs identified by the present invention in Figures 3A & 4 (see below). Furthermore, Le Douarin et al did not even suggest inhibitors of nuclear receptor - nuclear protein interaction. The term "antibodies" is meant to include polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, and the various types of antibody constructs such as for example F(ab') , Fab and single chain Fv. Antibodies are defined to be specifically binding if they bind with a K a of greater than or equal to about 10 7 M '1 . Affinity of binding can be determined using conventional techniques, for example those described by Scatchard et al., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 51: 660 (1949). Polyclonal antibodies can be readily generated from a variety of sources, for example, horses, cows, goats, sheep, dogs, chickens, rabbits, mice or rats, using procedures that are well-known in the art. In general, immunogen is administered to the host animal typically through parenteral injection. The immunogenicity may be enhanced through the use of an adjuvant, for example, Freund's complete or incomplete adjuvant. Following booster immunizations, small samples of serum are collected and tested for reactivity. Examples of various assays useful for such determination include those described in: Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Harlow and Lane (eds.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1988; as well as procedures such as countercurrent immuno-electrophoresis (CIEP), radioimmunoassay, radioimmunoprecipitation, enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assays (ELISA), dot blot assays, and sandwich assays, see U.S. Patent Nos. 4,376,110 and 4,486,530. Monoclonal antibodies may be readily prepared using well-known procedures, see for example, the procedures described in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,902,614, 4,543,439 and 4,411,993; Monoclonal Antibodies, Hybridomas: A New Dimension in Biological Analyses, Plenum Press, Kennett, McKearn, and Bechtol (eds.), (1980). Monoclonal antibodies can be produced using alternative techniques, such as those described by Alting-Mees et al., "Monoclonal Antibody Expression Libraries: A Rapid Alternative to Hybridomas", Strategies in Molecular Biology 3: 1-9 (1990) which is incorporated herein by reference. Similarly, binding partners can be constructed using recombinant DNA techniques to incorporate the variable regions of a gene that encodes a specific binding antibody. Such a technique is described in Larrick et al., Biotechnology, 7: 394 (1989). According to a further feature of the invention there is provided a pharmaceutical composition which comprises a novel inhibitor of the invention, or a pharmaceutically- acceptable salt thereof, in association with a pharmaceutically-acceptable diluent or carrier. The composition may be in a form suitable for oral use, for example a tablet, capsule, aqueous or oily solution, suspension or emulsion; for topical use, for example a cream, ointment, gel or aqueous or oily solution or suspension; for nasal use, for example a snuff, nasal spray or nasal drops; for vaginal or rectal use, for example a suppository; for administration by inhalation, for example as a finely divided powder such as a dry powder, a microcrystalline form or a liquid aerosol; for sub-lingual or buccal use, for example a tablet or capsule; or for parenteral use (including intravenous, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intravascular or infusion), for example a sterile aqueous or oily solution or suspension. In general the above compositions may be prepared in a conventional manner using conventional excipients. For peptidic inhibitors, parenteral compositions are preferred. The amount of active ingredient that is combined with one or more excipients to produce a single dosage form will necessarily vary depending upon the host treated and the particular route of administration. For example, a formulation intended for oral administration to humans will generally contain, for example, from 0.5 mg to 2 g of active agent compounded with an appropriate and convenient amount of excipients which may vary from about 5 to about 98 percent by weight of the total composition. Dosage unit forms will generally contain about 1 mg to about 500 mg of an active ingredient. According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of mapping nuclear receptor interaction domains in nuclear proteins in which the method comprises analysis of the sequence of a nuclear protein for the presence of signature motifs as defined herein in order to identify an interaction domain or a potential interaction domain. Preferably the analysis further comprises analysis of any potential interaction domains identified thereby for α-helicity and/or surface accessibility. The invention is illustrated by the non-limiting Examples below in which, unless stated otherwise: temperatures are expressed in degrees Celsius; and peptide sequences are listed N -terminus to C -terminus. Figures la/lb show the interaction of LXXLL motifs derived from coactivators with the ER. Figure la: Yeast two hybrid interactions of LXXLL motifs, derived from the proteins RIP 140, SRC la and CBP with the LBDs of wild type or mutant ER. The sequences of the LXXLL motifs in the DNA binding domain (DBD) fusion proteins are indicated. DBD- LXXLL proteins were coexpressed with AAD-ER or AAD-ER Mut, which consist of an acidic activation domain (AAD) fused to the LBD of the wild-type ER, or a transcriptionally defective ER mutant, respectively. Reporter activities were determined in the presence or absence of 10-?M 17-β-estradiol (E2) and expressed as units of β-galactosidase activity. Sequences listed in Figure la, from top to bottom, are listed as SEQ ID NO: 6-23 respectively. Figure lb: Effects of mutations in the RIP140 LXXLL motif located at amino acids 935-943 on binding of AAD-ER. Conserved leucine residues are boxed and mutated residues are circled. The reporter activity was determined in the presence (black bars) or absence (white bars) of 10- 7 M E2. Sequences listed in Figure lb, from top to bottom, are listed as SEQ ID NO: 24-32 respectively. Figures 2a/2b/2c show that LXXLL motifs are required for binding of SRC1 to the ER LBD in vitro and for the ability of SRC1 to enhance ER activity in vivo. Figure 2a: Wild type (SRCla) and mutant (SRCla-M1234) SRC1 proteins are shown schematically. The black bars represent the approximate locations of the LXXLL binding motifs in the linear SRCla sequence and the shaded circles indicate the mutation of LXXLL binding motifs by replacement of conserved leucine residues with alanines (see Methods). Binding of wild type SRCla or SRC la-M 1234 mutant to glutathione S transferase (GST) alone, to the ligand binding domain (aa 313-599) of ER (GST-AF2), or the SRC1 binding domain (aa 2058-2163) of CBP (GST-CBP) in the presence (+) and absence (-) of 10-6M E2. The signals obtained with 10% of the input of [ 5S] -labelled wild type and mutant SRC1 proteins are shown. Figure 2b: The ability of increasing amounts of the peptides P-l (SEQ ID NO: 2) and P-2 (SEQ ID NO: 72) to compete against the binding of wild type SRCla to GST-AF2 in the presence of ligand is shown. The sequences of the P-l and P-2 peptides are given at the foot of Fig 2b, and the conserved leucines and alanine substitutions are boxed. Figure 2c: Wild type but not mutant SRCle Ml 23 potentiates activation by ER of the reporter gene 2ERE-pS2-CAT in transiently transfected Hela cells. Reporter activities obtained from extracts of transfected cells grown in the absence (white columns) or presence (black columns) of ligand (10-«M E2). The amounts of ER, SRCl-wt and and SRCl-mut expression plasmids used in the transfections are indicated below the graph. The activities shown are averaged from duplicates. Figures 3a/3b & 4 show that the LXXLL sequence is a signature motif in proteins that bind the LBDs of NRs. Figure 3a: Alignment of LXXLL motif sequences present in human RIP 140 10 . human SRCla, mouse TIF2 , mouse CBP 23.24 . p 300 33, moU se TIFl π and human TRIP proteins i 2 . The conserved leucines are boxed and the amino acid numbers are given for each motif. Sequences listed in Figure 3 A, from top to bottom, are listed as SEQ ID NO: 33-61 respectively. Figure 3b: Schematic representation of the incidence of LXXLL motifs (black bars) in the sequences of proteins which bind NRs. The amino acid boundaries of the known NR binding sites are also shown. Figure 4: Alignment of LXXLL motif sequences present in CBP, P300, p/CIP, ARA70 & TRIP 230. The conserved leucines are boxed and the amino acid numbers are given for each motif. Sequences listed in Figure 4, from top to bottom, are listed as SEQ ID NO: 62-71 respectively. Figure 5 shows that the precise nature of the LXXLL signature motif affects the strength of the interaction between SRC-la and the LBDs of ERα, ERβ and GR. Figure 5a: The ERα LBD binds to the 4 signature motifs of SRC- la with differing affinities in yeast 2-hybrid assays (SRC- la motif 1-4 = SEQ ID 73-76). The order (decreasing affinity) is SRC- 1 a motif 2> SRC- 1 a motif 4 > SRC- 1 a motif 1 > SRC- 1 a motif 3. Figure 5b: The ERβ LBD binds to the signature motifs of SRC- la with the same relative affinities seen with ERα. The order (decreasing affinity) is SRC- la motif 2 > SRC- la motif 4> SRC- la motif 1 > SRC- la motif 3. Figure 5c: The GR LBD binds to the signature motifs of SRC-1 with differing affinities and the rank order of affinities differs to those seen with ERα and ERβ. The order (decreasing affinity) is SRC-a motif 4 > SRC- la motif 1 = SRC- la motif 2 = SRC- la motif 3. In Figure 5 the y-axis units represent relative 3-galactosidase activity. In Figure 5 the x-axis motif numbering only indicates part of the actual sequence used which was as follows: 627- 640, 684-696, 743-755 and 1428-1441. The following abbreviations are used. Standard amino acid abbreviations have been used. Alanine Ala A Arginine Arg R Asparagine Asn N Aspartic Acid Asp D Cysteine Cys C Glutamic Acid Glu E Glutamine Gin Q Glycine Gly G Histidine His H Isoleucine lie I Leucine Leu L Lysine Lys K Methionine Met M Phenylalanine Phe F Proline Pro P Serine Ser s Threonine Thr T Tryptophan Trp w Tyrosine Tyr Y Valine Val V Any amino acid Xaa X Point mutations will be referred to as follows: natural amino acid (using the 1 letter nomenclature) , position, new amino acid. For example "L636A" means that at position 636 a leucine (L) has been changed to alanine (A). Multiple mutations will be shown between square brackets. Example 1 Mapping of interaction sites between Nuclear Receptor and Nuclear Protein It has been previously demonstrated that the 140 kDa receptor interacting protein (RIP 140) bound directly to NRs through at least two distinct sites located at the N- and C- termini of the protein 21. To map these interaction sites in more detail, we examined a series of twenty different PCR-generated fragments of RIP 140 coding sequence fused in frame with a heterologous DBD, for interaction with NRs in a two hybrid system. Remarkably, although the different constructs spanned the entire 1158 amino acids of RIP 140 sequence, all but two displayed ligand-dependent interaction with ER, including five non-overlapping RIP 140 sequences. By comparison of the sequences of the shortest interacting fragments we identified a short motif (LXXLL) common to all interacting fragments. In total, nine copies of the motif were identified in the RIP 140 sequence, but the motif was absent in fragments showing no binding activity in our experiments. To determine if these short sequences were sufficient to bind to NRs, we constructed a series of proteins consisting of a DBD fused to eight to ten amino acids incorporating one copy of each of the nine LXXLL motifs. As shown in Fig. la, each of the nine motifs present in RIP 140 displayed strong ligand-dependent interaction with the LBD of the ER whereas the DBD alone showed no ability to bind. (Note that of the 10 motifs listed for RIP 140, the 10 th is a repeat of the 9 th locus). Comparable results were obtained with the LBD of RAR (data not shown). Mutation of hydrophobic residues within HI 2 abolish AF2 activity and prevent the recruitment of RIP 140 ιo, TIFl ", TIF2 6, SUG1 13 and SRC1. Similarly, mutation of HI 2 residues M543 and L544 in the ER abolished the ligand-dependent interaction of all nine LXXLL motifs with ER (Fig. la). Taking these results together, we conclude that a short conserved motif comprised within as little as eight amino acids is sufficient to bind to transcriptionally active NRs. This discovery that such a relatively small motif can affect the interaction between two relatively large molecules is unprecedented in this field. Secondary structure analysis using the Phd program 22 revealed that each of the nine copies of this motif in RIP 140 occurred within a region predicted to be α-helical in nature, in which the conserved leucines would form a hydrophobic face. Example 2 Mutational Analysis of a Signature Motif To determine the sequence constraints required to observe a functional interaction, we carried out a partial mutational analysis of one of the RIP140 motifs (amino acids 935-943; Fig. lb). While western blot analysis showed no significant variation in the expression of the wild type and mutant fusion proteins (data not shown), mutation of valine 935 to alanine resulted in approximately ten fold reduction in the reporter activity in the presence of ligand which, when coupled with the observation that the first amino acid is hydrophobic in seven of the nine LXXLL motifs in RIP 140, may indicate a preference for a hydrophobic residue at this position. Strikingly, mutation of any one of the three conserved leucine residues L936, L939 or L940 to alanine resulted in a complete loss of binding to the LBD of ER (Fig. lb) and RAR (data not shown), emphasising their importance in mediating the interaction with NRs. In contrast, mutation to alanine of L941 (which is not conserved among the motifs; see Fig. 3a), had no effect on the ability of this sequence to bind to the ER LBD. Replacement of a conserved leucine residue with a valine was tolerated at L936, but not at L939 or L940 indicating that hydrophobic character alone is not sufficient to maintain an interaction with ER (Fig. lb). The amino acids K937, Q938, S942 and E943 were not subjected to mutagenesis as they are not conserved among the motifs we have identified (see Fig. 3a). Example 3 Analysis of Signature Motifs in Nuclear Proteins The steroid receptor coactivator SRC1, which stimulates ligand-dependent transcriptional activity, was originally identified as a partial cDNA encoding a protein capable of interacting with the progesterone receptor by means of a 196 amino acid C-terminal region 3. We noted that the eight most C-terminal amino acids fit the LXXLL consensus, and indeed this sequence (DBD-SRCla 1434-1441) displayed strong ligand-induced binding to ER, but not the ER H12 mutant (Fig. la). Subsequent studies have identified full-length SRC1 (SRCla) from mouse (1459 amino acids) 4 >5 and human (1441 amino acids) tissues. Both murine and human SRCla proteins interact with multiple NRs, and contain an additional interaction region between residues 569 to 789 5 and 570-780, respectively. Three copies of the LXXLL motif were identified in this central interaction domain of human SRCla (see Fig. 3a & 3b), each of which displayed ligand-dependent binding to both ER (Fig. la) and RAR (data not shown) in the two hybrid assay, but not the ER HI 2 mutant. Interestingly, the sequences and relative positions of the three motifs in the central domain of SRCla are conserved in the related coactivator protein Transcriptional Intermediary Factor 2 (TIF2) (Fig. 3a + b), and correspond to the region of TIF2 known to bind to NRs 6. However, unlike SRCla, TIF2 appears to lack a motif at its C-terminus. In addition, we noted that SRC1 contains three other sequences matching the LXXLL consensus. Although the motif at residues 45-53 is predicted by the Phd program to be α-helical and lies within the basic helix- loop-helix domain at the N-terminus of SRCla 5, it showed only a very weak (6-fold) interaction with Iiganded ER (Fig. la) or RAR (not shown) in the yeast two hybrid assay. This is consistent with the observed absence of strong NR-binding activity associated with the N-terminus of SRC 1. The other two motifs within residues 11 1-118 and 912-920 both contain proline residues and are unlikely to adopt α-helical structure according to the Phd program. Indeed, these sequences showed no detectable interaction with NRs in our binding assays (Fig. la), which strongly suggests a preference for appropriate secondary structure for binding of LXXLL sequences to NRs. Recent reports have indicated that CBP/p300 proteins, which were originally identified as coactivators for CREB 23,24 ? are coactivators for many transcription factors including NRs 4,5,8,9 and may serve as integrators of several signalling pathways 4 . CBP was shown to bind directly to NRs via its N-terminal 101 amino acids 4 . with a possible RXR- specific binding site between residues 356-495 8. Our analysis showed that the CBP sequence harbours copies of the LXXLL motif within positions 68-78, and 356-364, which are conserved in the p300 sequence (amino acids 80-90 and 341-351; Fig 3a). Indeed, when tested in the two hybrid assay, the N-terminus of CBP (amino acids 1-101; data shown) and the LXXLL motif at residues 68-75 of the CBP sequence (Fig. la) displayed ligand-dependent binding to ER, but not the transciptionally defective ER mutant (Fig. la). Example 4 The Binding Of Coactivator Proteins To NRs Is Dependent On Signature Motifs To demonstrate that the binding of coactivator proteins to NRs is dependent on LXXLL motifs, we introduced alanine substitutions in SRCla at the conserved leucine couplets at residues [L636A, L637A, L693N L694N L752N L753N L1438N L1439N] thus effectively creating a mutant protein (SRCla-M1234) in which all the four functional binding motifs were disabled. We then compared the ability of in vitro translated SRCla and SRC la-M 1234 to bind to the ligand binding domain of the mouse estrogen receptor fused to glutathione-S-transferase (GST-AF2) in GST pulldown experiments (Maniatis et α/.,(1982) Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbour, New York.). As shown in Fig. 2a, while wild type SRCla protein displayed ligand- dependent binding to GST-AF2, SRC la-M 1234 failed to bind to GST-AF2 either in the presence or absence of ligand. To confirm that the mutations did not induce gross structural disruption of the SRC la-M 1234, we compared the ability of the in vitro translated proteins to interact with amino acids 2058-2163 of CBP, which was previously defined as the SRC1 binding domain 4 . Both proteins retained strong binding to GST-CBP (Fig. 2a) indicating that this SRC1 function remained intact in both wild type and mutant proteins. In addition we showed that the binding of wild type SRCla to GST-AF2 was competed by increasing concentrations of a short peptide (PI) corresponding to the motif at the C-terminus of SRCla (Fig. 2b). In contrast, a similar peptide (P2) in which the LXXLL motif was mutated, or peptides unrelated to the LXXLL motif (data not shown), did not compete the binding of SRC la to GST-AF2 (Fig. 2b). Finally, to demonstrate that LXXLL motifs are necessary for the function of SRC1 in vivo, we compared the abilities of wild type SRC1 and a mutant protein in which all LXXLL motifs were disabled to enhance the activity of mouse ER in transient transfection experiments. As shown in Fig. 2c, wild type SRC1 enhanced the activity of ER in a concentration-dependent manner. In contrast, the SRC1 mutant, which was unable to bind ER (Fig. 2a) had no stimulatory effect, but reduced ER activity by up to 50% at the highest concentration (Fig. 2c). This apparent dominant negative property of the mutant SRC1 is likely due to its ability to maintain interactions with CBP while failing to interact with NRs (Fig. 2a). This result is of interest given the recent evidence that SRC1 and CBP/p300 may exist as a complex in vivo 9, and that CBP also has NR binding activity 4 , 8. s our data suggest that the interactions between NRs and CBP are insufficient to compensate for the inability of the SRCla mutant protein to bind NRs, at least under these conditions. It remains to be determined whether NRs are engaged simultaneously by pi 60 and p300 proteins functioning independently or as a complex. Examination of the sequences of other proteins known to bind to NRs revealed them to contain one or more copies of the LXXLL motif. TIFl contains a single motif (residues 722- 5 732) within the minimal region known to be required for its interaction with NRs i L 25. The truncated proteins TRIPs2-5, TRIP8 and TRIP9, which were isolated in a two hybrid screen for TR-interacting proteins 12 , each contain at least one copy of the LXXLL motif (Fig. 3a), whereas the motif was absent in TRIPs whose interaction with TR was ligand-independent. An alignment of a selection of these sequences is shown in Fig. 3a, while Fig. 3b shows the 0 incidence of motifs in the sequences of RIP 140, SRCla, TIFl, TIF2, CBP and p300, and the boundaries of known receptor interaction domains in these proteins. Interestingly, motifs were also identified in several other proteins for which evidence exists of interaction with NRs, including Ara70 26, SW13 27, an d the RelA (p65) subunit of NFκ-B 28, although the receptor interaction domains in these proteins have not been mapped. The ability of other 5 proteins containing LXXLL motifs to bind to NRs will depend on their subcellular localisation, as well as the α-helicity and surface accessibility of the motifs. While it is clear that the conserved leucine residues are essential for the function of the motif, other amino acids may also be important given the degree of sequence conservation of equivalent motifs in SRCl/TIF2 or CBP/p300. 0 As many NR binding proteins contain multiple copies of the LXXLL motif it remains to be established whether this facilitates the simultaneous contact of individual partners in homo- and heterodimers of NRs, or whether it serves to provide alternative interaction surfaces to accomodate conformational changes imposed by the binding of NRs to different response elements. The systematic mutation of LXXLL motifs in coactivators such as SRC1 5 and CBP may allow us to decouple crosstalk or synergy between different signal transduction pathways, and thus provide a better understanding of their proposed roles as coactivators and integrators. Example 5 Two Hybrid Interaction Assays The yeast reporter strain used for all two hybrid assays was W303-1B (HMLα MATα HMRa his3-l 1, 15 trpl-1 ade2-l canl-100 leu2-3, 11, ura3) carrying the plasmid pRLΔ21- U3ERE which contains a lacZ reporter gene driven by three estrogen response elements (EREs) 2 . The plasmids pBLl and pASV3 which express the human ER DNA binding domain (DBD) and the VP16 acidic activation domain (AAD) respectively 30, were used to generate DBD or AAD fusion proteins for two hybrid interaction analyses. DBD-LXXLL motif fusion proteins were generated by ligation of phosphorylated, annealed oligonucleotide pairs into the pBLl vector. AAD-ER was constructed by cloning a PCR fragment encoding amino acids 282-595 of the human ER into pASV3. AAD-ER Mut was constructed in a similar fashion except that the amino acids M543 and L544 or ER were mutated to alanines by recombinant PCR. All fusion constructs were fully sequenced. Transformants containing the desired plasmids were obtained by selection for the appropriate plasmid markers and were grown to late log phase in 15 ml of selective medium (yeast nitrogen base containing 1% glucose and appropriate supplements) in the presence or absence of lOAvl 17-β-estradiol (E2). The expression of DBD- and AAD- fusion proteins in yeast cell-free extracts was verified by immunodetection using a monoclonal antibody recognising the human ER (a gift from P. Chambon, Strasbourg). The antibody recognises the "F" region of the LBD in the human ER, and also the "F" region tag at the N-termini of the DBD fusion proteins 30. Equal amounts of protein were electrophoresed on polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose for western blotting. The preparation of cell-free extracts by the glass bead method and the measurement of β-galactosidase activity in the extracts were performed as previously described 29. Two hybrid experiments were repeated several times, and the data shown in Figs, la and lb represent reporter activities as measured in a single representative experiment. The β-galactosidase activities are expressed as nmoles/minute/μg protein. Example 6 In Vitro Binding And Peptide Inhibition Assays GST-AF2 consists of the ligand binding domain of the mouse ER (amino acids 313- 599) fused to glutathione-S-transferase and has been described previously 31. GST-CBP consists of GST fused to the SRC 1 -binding domain of CBP and was constructed by cloning a PCR fragment encoding residues 2058-2163 of mouse CBP into the vector pGEX2TK (Pharmacia). Human SRCla and SRCle cDNAs were isolated form a human B cell cDNA library and cloned into a modified version of the expression vector pSG5. SRCla Ml 234 and SRCleM123 were constructed by recombinant PCR to introduce the mutations [L636A, L637A, L693A, L694A, L752A, L753A, L1438A, L1439A] or [L636A, L637A, L693A, L694A, L752A, L753A] respectively. All SRC1 constructs were fully sequenced. GST- SEPHAROSE™ beads were loaded with GST alone or GST-fusion proteins prepared from bacterial cell-free extracts. [35S]-labelled SRC1 proteins were generated by in vitro translation and tested for interaction with GST proteins in the presence or absence of 10-6M estradiol (E2) as previously described 21 . Binding was carried out for 3 hours at 4° with gentle mixing in NETN buffer (100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 % NP-40, 20 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0) containing protease inhibitors in a final volume of 1 ml. Peptides P-l and P-2 were dissolved in water at a concentration of 4mg/ml and added individually to GST-binding reactions immediately before the addition of ligand. The increasing amounts of peptide added in the competition experiments shown corresponded to 2.5, 5, 12.5 and 25 μM. Using analogous methodology, peptides KLVQLLTTT (SEQ ID NO: 3), ILHRLLQE (SEQ ID NO: 4) and LLQQLLTE (SEQ ID NO: 5) can be shown to be inhibitors. Example 7 Transient Reporter Assays Hela cells were transfected with lμg of reporter 2ERE-pS2-CAT 32, 150 ng of β- galactosidase expression plasmid (internal control), 10 ng of ER expression plasmid and 50 or 200 ng of SRC1 expression plasmids or empty vector per well (in duplicate) using 24-well plates. Transfected cells were incubated overnight in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium without phenol red and containing 10% charcoal-treated FBS, and washed in fresh medium before addition of ligand (10-8M E2 ) or vehicle. After 40 hrs, cells were harvested and extracts analysed for CAT and β-galactosidase activities 14, 21. β-galactosidase activities were used to correct for differences in transfection efficiency. Example 8 Pharmaceutical Composition The following illustrates a representative pharmaceutical dosage form containing a peptide inhibitor and which may be used for therapy. Iniectable solution A sterile aqueous solution, for injection, containing per ml of solution: Peptide P-l 5.0mg Sodium acetate trihydrate 6.8mg Sodium chloride 7.2mg Tween 20 0.05mg A typical dose of peptide for adult humans is 30mg. Example 9 The strength of the interaction of coactivator signature motifs to NRs varies depending on the precise motif sequence The interaction between the ERα LBD and a range of different LXXLL motif fusion proteins appeared to yield different reporter gene activity indicating that the ERα LBD interacted with the LXXLL motifs with differing affinities (see Example 5), therefore the strength of these interactions was investigated more closely. The motifs of SRC- la were tested for their relative interaction specificities with the glucocorticoid receptor and estrogen receptor isoforms α and β in a yeast two hybrid assay. The SRC- la motifs 1-4 (SEQ ID 73-76) were expressed as fusion proteins with the LexA DNA binding domain. Motif fusion proteins were generated by ligation of annealed oligonucleotide pairs in frame into the ADH promoter driven LexA DBD vector YCpl4- ADH-LexA. YC l4ADHl-LexA is a plasmid from which LexA is expressed under control of the S. cerevisiae ADHl promoter. The backbone of this vector is the plasmid RS314 (Sikorski and Hieter, 1989). Between the Sac I and Kpn I restriction enzyme sites in the polylinker of this vector we have placed an expression cassette comprising the promoter of the S. cerevisiae ADHl gene, the coding region of the E. coli LexN gene and the transcription termination region region of the S. cerevisiae ADHl gene. The promoter region of ADHl consists of a 1.4kb Bam HI- Hind III fragment from the plasmid pADΝS (Colicelli et al, 1989). Following the Hind III site is the coding region (amino acids 1-202) of E. coli LexA (Horii et al, 1981; Miki et aL 1981 ; Markham et al, 1981). The E coli LexA fragment was obtained as a Hind III- Pst I fragment from the plasmid pBXLl (Martin et al, 1990). This sequence corresponds to nucleotides 95-710 of Genbank entry g 146607, Following this sequence is a region which encodes a polylinker (SΕQ ID 77). GAATTCCTGCAGCCCGGGGTCGACACTAGTTAACTAGCGGCCGC This polylinker adds the amino acids ΕFLQPGVDTS (SΕQ ID NO: 80) to the carboxy terminus of LexA. The Not I site at the end of this linker is linked to a DNA fragment which includes the transcription terminator region of the S. cerevisiae ADHl gene. This fragment is the 0.6kb Not I-Bam HI from the plasmid pADNS (Colicelli et al, 1989). The NR LBDs were expressed as fusions with the Gal4 transcriptional AD. The LBD fusions were constructed by cloning a PCR fragment encoding the amino acids corresponding to the LBDs into YCpl5Gall-rl l.YCpl5Gall-rl 1 is a plasmid from which fusions of the activation region of the S. cerevisiae Gal4 protein may be expressed under the control of the S. cerevisiae GALl promoter. The backbone of this vector is the plasmid RS315 (Sikorski and Hieter, 1989). Between the Sac I and Kpn I restriction enzyme sites in the polylinker of this vector we have placed an expression cassette comprising the promoter of the S. cerevisiae GALl gene, the coding region of the fusion protein and the transcriptional termination region of the S. cerevisiae ADHl gene. The GALl promoter (Johnson and Davis, 1984;Yocum et al, 1984; West et al, 1984) was obtained by amplification of a S. cerevisiae genomic fragment by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This fragment corresponds to nucleotides 177 to 809 of Genbank database entry gl71546. This is followed by the sequence AAGCTTCCACCATGGTGCCAAAGAAGAAACGTAAAGTT (SΕQ ID 78). This sequence provides a translation initiation codon and a sequence which encodes the amino acids MVPKKKRKV (SΕQ ID NO: 81). The last seven residues of this peptide correspond to a region identified as a nuclear localisation signal in the SV40 T antigen (amino acids 126-132 of Genbank entry g310678; Fiers et al, 1978; Reddy et al, 1978). This region is linked to sequence encoding the region II transcription activation domain (amino acids 768- 881) of Gal4, as defined by Ma and Ptashne (1987). The sequence was isolated by PCR from plasmid pBXGalll (P. Broad unpublished) which is a mammalian version of the yeast expression vector pMA236 (Ma and Ptashne, 1987) and corresponds to nucleotides 2744 to 3085 of Genbank entry gl71557 (Laughon and Gesteland (1984). This sequence is followed by the polylinker TCTAGACTGCAGACTAGTAGATCTCCCGGGGCGGCCGC (SEQ ID 79). All fusion constructs were fully sequenced. The vectors YCpl4-ADH-lexA and YCpl5Gall-rl 1 replicate as a single copy plasmids in yeast(ARS-CEN) and have TRP1 and LEU2 markers respectively. The S. cerevisiae strain MEY132 (M. Egerton, Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, unpublished, genotype (Mata leu2-3,112 ura3-52 trpl his4 rmel) was employed as a host strain. A reporter gene consisting of the E. coli lacZ (β-galactosidase) gene under the control of a promoter containing two binding sites for the lexA protein was integrated at the ura3 locus of this strain. The reporter gene plasmid, JP159-lexRE was constructed using plasmid JP159 as a backbone (J. Pearlberg, Ph.D. Thesis (1994) Harvard University). This is a shuttle vector which contains the S. cerevisiae URA3 as a marker. The plasmid contains the the E.coli β- galactosidase gene under the control of a minimal promoter containing the TATA box and transcription initiation site from the S. cerevisiae GALl promoter (Dixon et al 1997). Upstream of this promoter is a terminator from the GAL11 gene. Between the Xba I and Sal I sites in the promoter of this plasmid a 35 nucleotide sequence corresponding to a naturally occurring binding sites for the LexA protein in the promoter of the colicin El gene (Ebina et al, 1983) the sequence corresponds to residues 20-54 of Genbank entry g 144345). This sequence contains two LexA operators and is therefore referred to as "21ex". This reporter plasmid was linearised within the URA3 gene and integrated into the ura3 locus of MEY132 to give the yeast strain MEY132-lexRE Transformants containing the 2 hybrid fusion constructs were grown to late log phase in 20ml selective medium (2% glucose and appropriate supplements). They were then diluted into 2% galactose containing medium, in the presence or absence of ligand. As controls each LBD fusion was coexpressed with the LexA DBD lacking the coactivator motifs and similarly each motif LexA DBD fusion was coexpressed with Gal4 AD lacking the NR LBD. The relative expression levels of DBD fusion proteins were determined by immunodetection using a monoclonal antibody which recognises LexA. The estrogen receptor isoforms α and β relative interaction specificities for the 4 motifs of SRC- la are ranked as follows, 2>4>1>3 (see Figure 5) . Glucocorticoid receptor specificities are as follows 4> 1=2=3. The yeast 2-hybrid system used in this Example utilises a single copy integrated reporter gene construct. This enables a quantitative comparison between the different yeast strains bearing the different SRCla motifs. The data presented in Figure 5 suggest that motif 3 (SRC la, 748-753) interacts very weakly, using this system, with ER. Longer exposures to oestradiol (not shown) do however reveal a significant interaction. It is noted that Figure 1A herein clearly shows an interaction between motif 3 and ER but this interaction is significantly weaker than that seen with the other motifs. Any differences in this regard between Figures 5 and 1A can be explained by experimental design features. For example, vectors used to generate the Figure 5 data were low copy number (centromere containing) vectors, whereas vectors used to generate the Figure 1 A data were multicopy (2 micron) vectors. REFERENCES 1. Beato, M., Herrlich, P. & Schutz, G. Cell 83, 851-857 (1995). 2. Mangelsdorf, D.J., et al. Cell 83, 835-839 (1995) 3. Onate, S.A., Tsai, S.Y., Tsai, M.-J. & O'Malley, B.W. Science 270, 1354-1357 (1995). 4. Kamei, Y., et al. Cell 85, 403-414 (1996). 5. Yao, T.-P., Ku, G., Zhou, N., Scully, R. & Livingston, D.M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, (1996). 6. Voegel, J.J., Heine, M.J.S., Zechel, C, Chambon, P. & Gronemeyer, H. EMBO J 15, (1996). 7. Hong, H., Kohli, K., Trivedi, A., Johnson, D.L. & Stallcup, M.R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 4948-4952 (1996). 8. Chakravarti, D., et al. Nature 383, 99-103 (1996). 9. Hanstein, B., et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 11540-11545 (1996). lO.Cavailles, V., et al. EMBO J 14, 3741-3751 (1995). 1 l.Le Douarin, B., et al. EMBO J 14, 2020-2033 (1995). 12.Lee, J.W., Ryan, F., Swaffield, J.C., Johnston, S.A. & Moore, D.D. Nature 374, 91-94, (1995). 13.vom Baur, E., et al. EMBO J 15, 119-124 (1996). H.Danielian, P.S., White, R., Lees, J.A. & Parker, M.G. EMBO J 11, 1025-1033 (1992). 15.Bourguet, W., Ruff, M., Chambon, P., Gronemever, H. & Moras, D. Nature 375, 377-3 82 (1995). lό.Renaud, J.-P., et al. Nature 378, 681-689 (1995). 17.Wagner, R.L., et al. Nature 378, 690-697 (1995). lδ.Barettino, D., Ruiz, M.D.M.V. & Stunnenberg, H.G. EMBO J 13, 3039-3049 (1994). 19.Durand, B., et al. EMBO J 13, 5370-5382 (1994). 20.Saatcioglu, F., Bartunek, P., Deng, T., Zenke, M. & Karin, M. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 3675- 3685 (1993). 21.L'Horset, F., Dauvois, S., Heery, D.M., Cavailles, V. & Parker, M.G. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6029-6036 (1996). 22.Rost, B. & Sander, C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90, 7558-7562 (1993). 23.Kwok, R.P.S., et al. Nature 370, 223-226 (1994). 24.Arias, J., et al. Nature 370, 226-229 (1994). 25.Le Douarin, B., et al. EMBO J 15, 6701-6715 (1996). 26.Yeh, S. & Chang, C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 5517-5521 (1996). 27.Yoshinaga, S.K., Peterson, C.L., Herskowitz, I. & Yamamoto, K.R. Science 258, 1598- 1604 (1992). 28.Stein, B. & Yang, M.X. Mol & Cell Biology 15, 4971-4979 (1995). 29.Metzger, D., Losson, R., Bornert, J.-M., Lemoine, Y. & Chambon, P. Nucl Acid Res 20, 2813-2817 (1992). 30.Le Douarin, B., Pierrat, B., vom Baur, E., Chambon, P. & Losson, R. Nucl Acid Res 23, 876-878 (1995). 31.Cavailles, V., Dauvois, S., Danielian, P.S. & Parker, M.G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91, 10009-10013 (1994). 32.Montano, M.M., Ekena, K., Krueger, K.D., Keller, A.L. & Katzenellenbogen, B.S. Mol. Endocrinol 10, 230 -242 (1996). 33.Eckner, R., et al. Genes & Dev 8, 869-884 (1994). 34.Colicelli, J. Birchmeier, C, Michaeli, T., O'Neill, K., Riggs, M. and Wigler, M. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 3599-3603. 35.Dixon, G., Scanlon, D., Cooper, S. and Broad, P. (1997). J. Ster. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 62, 165-171. 36.Ebina, Y., Takahara, Y., Kishi, F., Nakazawa, A., and Brent, R. (1983). J. Biol. Chem. 258, 13258-13621. 37.Fiers W., Contreras R., Haegemann G., Rogiers R., De Voorde A.,van Heuverswyn H., Van Herreweghe J., Volckaert G., Ysebaert M. (1978). Nature 273:113-120 38.Horii T., Ogawa T., Ogawa H.(1981) Cell 23:689-697. 39.Johnston M. and Davis R.W.(1984) Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:1440-1448. 40.Laughon, A. and Gesteland, R.F.(1984). Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 260-267. 41.Ma, J. and Ptashne, M. (1987) Cell 48, 847-853. 42.Markham B.E., Little J.W., Mount D.W. (1981). Nucleic Acids Res. 9:4149-4161 43.Martin, K.J., Lillie, J.W. and Green, M.R. (1990) Nature 346, 147-152. 44.Miki T., Ebina Y., Kishi F., Nakazawa A.(1981) Nucleic Acids Res. 9:529-543. 45. Sikorski, R.S. and Hieter, P. (1989) Genetics 122, 19-27. 46.Yocum, R.R., Hanley, S., West Jr., R. and Ptashne, M. (1984) Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 1985- 1998. Peptide Library related references 5 Abelson, J.N. (ed) (1996) Methods in Enzymology 267: combinatorial chemistry (Academic Press) Birnbaum, S. and Mosbach, K. (1992) Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 3, 49-54. Brenner, S. and Lerner, R.A. (1992) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5381-5383. Colas, P., Cohen, B., Jessen, T., Grishina, I., McCoy, J. and Brent, R. (1996) Nature 380, 548- 10 550. Cunningham, B.C., Lowe, D.G., Li, B., Bennett, B.D. and Wells, J.A. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2508-2515. Cwirla, S.E., Balasubramanian, P., Duffin, D.J., Wagstrom, C.R., Gates, CM., Singer, S.C., Davis, A.M., Tansik, R.L., Mattheakis, L.C., Boytos, CM., Schatz, P.J., Baccanari, D.P., 15 Wrighton, N.C., Barrett, R.W. and Dower, W.J. (1997) Science 276, 1696-1699. Cwirla, S.E., Peters, E.A., Barrett, R.W. and Dower, W.J. (1990) Proc. natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 6378-6832. Devlin, J.J., Panganiban, L.C and Devlin, P.E. (1990) Science 249, 404-406. Fields, S. and Song. O.-K. (1989) Nature 340, 245-246. 20 Houghten, R.A. (1993) Trends in Genetics 9, 235-239 Lam, K.S., Salmon, S.E., Hersh, E.M., Hruby, V.J., Kazmierski, W.M. and Knapp, R.J. (1991) Nature 354, 82-84. Markland, W., Ley, A.C., Lee, S.W. and Ladner, R.C (1996) Matthews, D.J. and Wells, J.A. (1993) Science 260, 1113-1117. 25 Roberts, B.L., Markland, W., Ley, A.C, Kent, R.B., White, D.W., Guterman, S.K. and Ladner, R.C. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 2429-2433. Scott, J.K. (1992) Trends Biochem. Sci. 17, 241-245. Scott, J.K. and Smith, G.P. (1990) Science 249, 386-390. Smith, M.M., Shi, L. and Navre, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 6440-6449. 30 Yang, M., Wu, Z. and Fields, S. (1995) Nuc. Acids Res. 23, 1152-1156. SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INFORMATION: (l) APPLICANT: (A) NAME: Imperial Cancer Research Technology Limited (B) STREET: Sardinia House, Sardinia Street, (C) CITY: London (D) STATE: England (E) COUNTRY: Great Britain (F) POSTAL CODE (ZIP) : WC2A 3NL (G) TELEPHONE: 0171 242 1136 (H) TELEFAX: 0171 831 4991 (ii) TITLE OF INVENTION: Chemical Compounds (m) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 79 (iv) COMPUTER READABLE FORM: (A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk (B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS (D) SOFTWARE: Patentln Release #1.0, Version #1.30 (EPO) (vi) PRIOR APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: GB 9708676.3 (B) FILING DATE: 30-APR-1997 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 1: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 5 ammo acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 1: Leu Xaa Xaa Leu Leu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 2: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 14 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 2: Pro Gin Ala Gin Gin Lys Ser Leu Leu Gin Gin Leu Leu Thr 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 3: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 3: Lys Leu Val Gin Leu Leu Thr Thr Thr 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 4: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ul MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 4: lie Leu His Arg Leu Leu Gin Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 5: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 5: Leu Leu Gin Gin Leu Leu Thr Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 6: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 10 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 6: Tyr Leu Glu Gly Leu Leu Met His Gin Ala 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 7: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 7: Leu Leu Ala Ser Leu Leu Gin Ser 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 8: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (11) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 8: His Leu Lys Thr Leu Leu Lys Lys Ser 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 9: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide ( i ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 9: Gin Leu Ala Leu Leu Leu Ser Ser 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 10: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 amino acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 10: Leu Leu Leu His Leu Leu Lys Ser Gin 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 11: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 11: Val Thr Leu Leu Gin Leu Leu Leu Gly 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 12: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 12: Val Leu Gin Leu Leu Leu Gly Asn 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 13: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 13: Leu Leu Ser Arg Leu Leu Arg Gin 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 14: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 10 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 14: Val Leu Lys Gin Leu Leu Leu Ser Glu Asn 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 15: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 15: Val Leu Lys Gin Leu Leu Leu Ser 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 16: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 16: Glu Leu Ala Glu Leu Leu Ser Ala Asn 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 17: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 17: Ser Leu Gly Pro Leu Leu Leu Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 18: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 amino acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 18: Lys Leu Val Gin Leu Leu Thr Thr Thr 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 19: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 19: lie Leu His Arg Leu Leu Gin Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 20: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 20: Leu Leu Arg Tyr Leu Leu Asp Lys 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 21: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 21: Gin Leu Asp Glu Leu Leu Cys Pro Pro 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 22: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ill MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (x ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 22: Leu Leu Gin Gin Leu Leu Thr Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 23: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 23: Gin Leu Ser Glu Leu Leu Arg Gly 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 24: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 10 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 24: Val Leu Lys Gin Leu Leu Leu Ser Glu Asn 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 25: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 25: Ala Leu Lys Gin Leu Leu Leu Ser Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 26: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear Ui) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 26: Val Ala Lys Gin Leu Leu Leu Ser Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 27: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 27: Val Val Lys Gin Leu Leu Leu Ser Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 28: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 28: Val Leu Lys Gin Ala Leu Leu Ser Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 29: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 amino acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 29: Val Leu Lys Gin Val Leu Leu Ser Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 30: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 30: Val Leu Lys Gin Leu Ala Leu Ser Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 31: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear Ui) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 31: Val Leu Lys Gin Leu Val Leu Ser Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 32: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 32: Val Leu Lys Gin Leu Leu Ala Ser Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 33: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 33: Tyr Leu Glu Gly Leu Leu Met His Gin Ala Ala 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 34: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 34: Leu Leu Ala Ser Leu Leu Gin Ser Glu Ser Ser 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 35: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 35: His Leu Lys Thr Leu Leu Lys Lys Ser Lys Val 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 36: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (11) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 36: Gin Leu Ala Leu Leu Leu Ser Ser Glu Ala His 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 37: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 37: Leu Leu Leu His Leu Leu Lys Ser Gin Thr lie 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 38: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 38: Leu Leu Gin Leu Leu Leu Gly His Lys Asn Glu 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 39: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 39: Val Leu Gin Leu Leu Leu Gly Asn Pro Lys Gly 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 40: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 40: Leu Leu Ser Arg Leu Leu Arg Gin Asn Gin Asp 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 41: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 amino acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 41: Val Leu Lys Gin Leu Leu Leu Ser Glu Asn Cys 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 42: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 42: Lys Leu Val Gin Leu Leu Thr Thr Thr Ala Glu 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 43: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (li) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 43: lie Leu His Arg Leu Leu Gin Glu Gly Ser Pro 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 44: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 44: Leu Leu Arg Tyr Leu Leu Asp Lys Asp Glu Lys 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 45: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 45: Leu Leu Gin Gin Leu Leu Thr Glu 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 46: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 46: Lys Leu Leu Gin Leu Leu Thr Thr Lys Ser Asp 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 47: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear Ui) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 47: lie Leu His Arg Leu Leu Gin Asp Ser Ser Ser 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 48: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear Ui) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 48: Leu Leu Arg Tyr Leu Leu Asp Lys Asp Asp Thr 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 49: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 49: Gin Leu Ser Glu Leu Leu Arg Gly Gly Ser Gly 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 50: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (11) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 50: Gin Leu Val Leu Leu Leu His Ala His Lys Cys 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 51: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 51: Gin Leu Ser Glu Leu Leu Arg Gly Ser Ser Pro 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 52: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 52: Gin Leu Val Leu Leu Leu His Ala His Lys Cys 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 53: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 53: lie Leu Thr Ser Leu Leu Leu Asn Ser Ser Gin 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 54: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 54: Met Leu Met Asn Leu Leu Lys Asp Asn Pro Ala 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 55: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 55: Thr Leu Arg Ser Leu Leu Leu Asn Pro His Leu 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 56: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 56: Arg Leu Ala Val Leu Leu Pro Gly Arg His Pro 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 57: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 57: Glu Leu His Asn Leu Leu Glu Val Val Ser Gin 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 58: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ιι| MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 58: Thr Leu Arg Asp Leu Leu Thr Thr Thr Ala Gly 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 59: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear Ui ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 59: Phe Leu Asp Phe Leu Leu Gly Phe Ser Ala Gly 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 60: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 60: Val Leu Glu Leu Leu Leu Arg Ala Gly Ala Asn 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 61: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 amino acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 61: lie Leu Ala Arg Leu Leu Arg Ala His Gly Ala 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 62: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 62: Ala Leu Gin Asp Leu Leu Arg Thr Leu Lys Ser 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 63: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 63: Ala Leu Gin Asn Leu Leu Arg Thr Leu Arg Ser 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 64: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 64: Lys Leu Leu Gin Leu Leu Thr Cys Ser Ser Asp 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 65: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 65: lie Leu His Lys Leu Leu Gin Asn Gly Asn Ser 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 66: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 66: Leu Leu Arg Tyr Leu Leu Asp Arg Asp Asp Pro 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 67: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 ammo acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear Ui ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 67: Gin Leu Tyr Ser Leu Leu Gly Gin Phe Asn Cys 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 68: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 10 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 68: Glu Leu Glu Asn Leu Leu Gin Gin Gly Gly 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 69: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 10 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear Ui ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 69: Val Leu Gin Lys Leu Leu Lys Glu Lys Asp 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 70: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 10 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 70: Glu Leu Asn Gin Leu Leu Asn Ala Val Lys 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 71: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 8 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 71: Val Leu Lys Asp Leu Leu Lys Gin 1 5 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 72: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 14 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 72: Pro Gin Ala Gin Gin Lys Ser Leu Leu Gin Gin Ala Ala Thr 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 73: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 14 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 73: Ser Gin Thr Ser His Lys Leu Val Gin Leu Leu Thr Thr Thr 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 74: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 13 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 74: Thr Ala Arg His Lys lie Leu His Arg Leu Leu Gin Glu 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 75: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 13 ammo acids (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 75: Ser Lys Asp His Gin Leu Leu Arg Tyr Leu Leu Asp Lys 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 76: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 14 amino acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ll ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 76: Gin Ala Gin Gin Lys Ser Leu Leu Gin Gin Leu Leu Thr Glu 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 77: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 44 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 77: GAATTCCTGC AGCCCGGGGT CGACACTAGT TAACTAGCGG CCGC 44 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 78: U) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 38 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 78: AAGCTTCCAC CATGGTGCCA AAGAAGAAAC GTAAAGTT 38 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 79: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 38 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (n) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 79: TCTAGACTGC AGACTAGTAG ATCTCCCGGG GCGGCCGC 38 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 80: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 10 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 80: Glu Phe Leu Gin Pro Gly Val Asp Thr Ser 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 81: (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 ammo acids (B) TYPE: ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii ) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 81: Met Val Pro Lys Lys Lys Arg Lys Val 1 5

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method for identifying inhibitor compounds capable of reducing the interaction between: a) a first region which is a signature motif on a nuclear protein, and b) a second region which is that part of a nuclear receptor which is capable of interacting with the nuclear protein through binding to the signature motif, wherein: the nuclear protein is a bridging factor that is responsible for the interaction between a Iiganded nuclear receptor and a transcription initiation complex involved in regulation of gene expression; the nuclear receptor is a transcription factor; the signature motif is a short sequence of amino acid residues which is the key structural element of a nuclear protein which binds to a Iiganded nuclear receptor as part of the process of the activation or repression of target genes; and in which the method comprises taking: i) the potential inhibitor compound; ii) the Iiganded nuclear receptor or a fragment thereof in which the fragment comprises the second region defined in this claim in b) above; iii) a fragment comprising a signature motif of the nuclear protein; and iv) detecting the presence or absence of inhibition of the interaction between ii) and iii). 2 A method according to claim 1 in which the signature motif is B'XXLL in which B 1 is any natural hydrophobic amino acid, L is leucine and X independently represents any natural amino acid. 3 A method according to claim 2 in which B* is leucine or valine. 4 A method according to claim 3 in which B 1 is leucine. 5 A method according to any one of claims 2-4 in which the signature motif is further defined as B 2 B'XXLL wherein B 2 is a hydrophobic amino acid. 6 A method according to claim 5 in which B 2 is selected from the group consisting of isoleucine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, tyrosine and valine. 7. A method according to any one of claims 1-6 in which the nuclear protein is a coactivator. 8. A method according to claim 7 in which the coactivator is selected from the group consisting of RIP 140, SRC-1, TIF2, CBP, p300, TIFl, Tripl, Trip2, Trip3, Trip4, Trip5, 5 Trip8, Trip9, p/CIP, ARA70 & Trip230. 9. A method according to any one of claims 1-6 in which the transcription factor is a steroid hormone receptor. 10. A method according to claim 9 in which the steroid hormone receptor is selected from the group consisting of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, androgen receptor and 10 glucocorticoid receptor. 11. A method according to claim 10 in which the steroid hormone receptor is oestrogen receptor. 12. A method according to any preceding claim wherein the method is in the form of a 2- hybrid assay system. 15 13 A method according to any preceding claim wherein the potential inhibitor is in the form of a peptide library based on a signature motif as defined in any one of claims 2-6. 14. A novel inhibitor identified according to the method defined in any one of claims 1-13 which reduces the interaction between a) a first region which is a signature motif on a nuclear protein, and 20 b) a second region which is that part of a nuclear receptor which is capable of interacting with the nuclear protein through binding to the signature motif, wherein: the nuclear protein is a bridging factor that is responsible for the interaction between a Iiganded nuclear receptor and the transcription initiation complex involved in regulation of 25 gene expression; the nuclear receptor is a transcription factor; the signature motif is a short sequence of amino acid residues which is the key structural element of a nuclear protein which binds to a Iiganded nuclear receptor as part of the process of the activation or repression of target genes. 30 15 An inhibitor according to claim 14 which is a peptide of less than 15 amino acid residues comprising the signature motif defined in any one of claims 1-6. 16 An inhibitor according to claim 15 selected from the group consisting of PQAQQKSLLQQLLT (SEQ ID NO: 2), KLVQLLTTT (SEQ ID NO: 3), ILHRLLQE (SEQ ID NO: 4) and LLQQLLTE (SEQ ID NO: 5). 17 An inhibitor according to claim 14 comprising an antibody which specifically binds to a signature motif on a nuclear protein. 18 A pharmaceutical composition which comprises an inhibitor as defined in any one of claims 14-17 or a pharmaceutically-acceptable salt thereof, in association with a pharmaceutically-acceptable diluent or carrier. 19 A method of mapping nuclear receptor interaction domains in nuclear proteins in which the method comprises analysis of the sequence of a nuclear protein for the presence of signature motifs as defined in any one of claims 1 -6 in order to identify an interaction domain or a potential interaction domain.

Inventors: HEERY DAVID MICHAEL, PARKER MALCOLM GEORGE, HEERY, DAVID, MICHAEL, PARKER, MALCOLM, GEORGE
Applicants: HEERY DAVID MICHAEL, IMP CANCER RES TECH, PARKER MALCOLM GEORGE, HEERY, DAVID, MICHAEL, IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, PARKER, MALCOLM, GEORGE
Application year: 1998
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: A61K38, A61K39, A61P29, A61P35, C07K7, C12Q1, G01N33