MUTANT alpha -AMYLASE COMPRISING MODIFICATION AT RESIDUES CORRESPONDING TO A210, H405 AND/OR T412 IN BACILLUS LICHENIFORMIS

Abstract: Alpha-amylase enzymes are disclosed in which one or more of residues corresponding to A210, H405 and T412 in Bacillus licheniformis are mutated. The disclosed alpha-amylase enzymes show altered or improved stability and/or activity profiles.

Description: MUTANT α-AMYLASE COMPRISING MODIFICATION AT RESIDUES CORRESPONDING TO A210, H405 AND/OR T412 IN BACILLUS UCHENIFORMIS FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention is directed to α-amylases having introduced therein mutations providing additional stability under certain conditions. It is specifically contemplated that the mutant will have altered performance characteristics such as altered stability and/or altered activity profiles. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION α-Amylases (α-1 ,4-glucan-4-glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.1) hydrolyze internal α- 1 ,4-glucosidic linkages in starch, largely at random, to produce smaller molecular weight malto-dextrins. α-Amylases are of considerable commercial value, being used in the initial stages (liquefaction) of starch processing; in alcohol production; as cleaning agents in detergent matrices; and in the textile industry for starch desizing. α-Amylases are produced by a wide variety of microorganisms including Bacillus and Aspergillus, with most commercial amylases being produced from bacterial sources such as Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus subtilis, or Bacillus stearothermophilus. In recent years, the preferred enzymes in commercial use have been those from Bacillus licheniformis because of their heat stability and performance under commercial operating conditions. In general, starch to fructose processing consists of four steps: liquefaction of granular starch, saccharification of the liquefied starch into dextrose, purification, and isomerization to fructose. The object of a starch liquefaction process is to convert a concentrated suspension of starch polymer granules into a solution of soluble shorter chain length dextrins of low viscosity. This step is essential for convenient handling with standard equipment and for efficient conversion to glucose or other sugars. To liquefy granular starch, it is necessary to gelatinize the granules by raising the temperature of the granular starch to over about 72°C. The heating process instantaneously disrupts the insoluble starch granules to produce a water soluble starch solution. The solubilized starch solution is then liquefied by α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1.). A common enzymatic liquefaction process involves adjusting the pH of a granular starch slurry to between 6.0 and 6.5, the pH optimum of α-amylase derived from Bacillus licheniformis, with the addition of calcium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate. The addition of calcium hydroxide has the advantage of also providing calcium ions which are known to stabilize the α-amylases against inactivation. Upon addition of α- amylases , the suspension is pumped through a steam jet to instantaneously raise the temperature to between 80-115°C. The starch is immediately gelatinized and, due to the presence of α-amylases, depolymerized through random hydrolysis of a(1-4) glycosidic bonds to a fluid mass which is easily pumped. In a second variation to the liquefaction process, α-amylase is added to the starch suspension, the suspension is held at a temperature of 80-100°C to partially hydrolyze the starch granules, and the partially hydrolyzed starch suspension is pumped through a jet at temperatures in excess of about 105°C to thoroughly gelatinize any remaining granular structure. After cooling the gelatinized starch, a second addition of α-amylase can be made to further hydrolyze the starch. A third variation of this process is called the dry milling process. In dry milling, whole grain is ground and combined with water. The germ is optionally removed by flotation separation or equivalent techniques. The resulting mixture, which contains starch, fiber, protein and other components of the grain, is liquefied using α-amylase. The general practice in the art is to undertake enzymatic liquefaction at a lower temperature when using the dry milling process. Generally, low temperature liquefaction is believed to be less efficient than high temperature liquefaction in converting starch to soluble dextrins. Typically, after gelatinization the starch solution is held at an elevated temperature in the presence of α-amylase until a DE of 10-20 is achieved, usually a period of 1-3 hours. Dextrose equivalent (DE) is the industry standard for measuring the concentration of total reducing sugars, calculated as D-glucose on a dry weight basis. Unhydrolyzed granular starch has a DE of virtually zero, whereas the DE of D-glucose is defined as 100. The maximum temperature at which the starch solution containing α-amylase can be held depends upon the microbial source from which the enzyme was obtained and the molecular structure of the α-amylase molecule. α-Amylases produced by wild type strains of Bacillus subtilis or Bacillus amyloliquefaciens are typically used at temperatures no greater than about 90°C due to excessively rapid thermal inactivation above that temperature, whereas α-amylases produced by wild type strains of Bacillus licheniformis can be used at temperatures up to about 110°C. The presence of starch and calcium ion are known to stabilize α-amylases against inactivation. Nonetheless, α-amylases are used at pH values above 6 to protect against rapid inactivation. At low temperatures, α-amylase from Bacillus licheniformis is known to display hydrolyzing activity on starch substrate at pH values lower than 5. However, when the enzyme is used for starch hydrolysis at common jet temperatures, e.g., between 102°C and 109°C, the pH must be maintained above at least pH 5.7 to avoid excessively rapid inactivation. The pH requirement unfortunately provides a narrow window of processing opportunity because pH values above 6.0 result in undesirable by-products, e.g., maltulose. Therefore, in reality, liquefaction pH is generally maintained between 5.9 and 6.0 to attain a satisfactory yield of hydrolyzed starch. Another problem relating to pH of liquefaction is the need to raise the pH of the starch suspension from about 4, the pH of a corn starch suspension as it comes from the wet milling stage, to 5.9-6.0. This pH adjustment requires the costly addition of acid neutralizing chemicals and also requires additional ion-exchange refining of the final starch conversion product to remove the chemical. Moreover, the next process step after liquefaction, typically saccharification of the liquefied starch into glucose with glucoamylase, requires a pH of 4-4.5; therefore, the pH must be adjusted down from 5.9- 6.0 to 4-4.5; requiring additional chemical addition and refining steps. Subsequent to liquefaction, the processed starch is saccharified to glucose with glucoamylase. A problem with present processes occurs when residual starch is present in the saccharification mixture due to an incomplete liquefaction of the starch, e.g., inefficient amylose hydrolysis by amylase. Residual starch is highly resistant to glucoamylase hydrolysis. It represents a yield loss and interferes with downstream filtration of the syrups. Additionally, many α-amylases are known to require the addition of calcium ion for stability. This further increases the cost of liquefaction. In U.S. Patent No. 5,322,778, liquefaction between pH 4.0 and 6.0 was achieved by adding an antioxidant such as bisulfite or a salt thereof, ascorbic acid or a salt thereof, erythorbic acid, or phenolic antioxidants such as butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, or a-tocopherol to the liquefaction slurry. According to this patent, sodium bisulfite must be added in a concentration of greater than 5mM. In U.S. Patent No. 5,180,669, liquefaction between a pH of 5.0 to 6.0 was achieved by the addition of carbonate ion in excess of the amount needed to buffer the solution to the ground starch slurry. Due to an increased pH effect which occurs with addition of carbonate ion, the slurry is generally neutralized by adding a source of hydrogen ion, for example, an inorganic acid such as hydrochloric acid or sulfuric acid. In PCT Publication No. WO 95/35382, a mutant α-amylase is described having improved oxidation stability and having changes at positions 104, 128, 187 and/or 188 in B. licheniformis α-amylase. In PCT Publication No. WO 96/23873, mutant α-amylases are described which have any of a number of mutations. In PCT Publication No. WO 94/02597, a mutant α-amylase having improved oxidative stability is described wherein one or more methionines are replaced by any amino acid except cysteine or methionine. In PCT publication No. WO 94/18314, a mutant α-amylase having improved oxidative stability is described wherein one or more of the methionine, tryptophan, cysteine, histidine or tyrosine residues is replaced with a non-oxidizable amino acid. In PCT Publication No. WO 91/00353, the performance characteristics and problems associated with liquefaction with wild type Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase are approached by genetically engineering the α-amylase to include the specific substitutions Ala-111-Thr, His-133-Tyr and/or Thr-149-lle. Studies using recombinant DNA techniques to explore which residues are important for the catalytic activity of amylases and/or to explore the effect of modifying certain amino acids within the active site of various amylases and glycosylases have been conducted by various researchers (Vihinen et al., J. Biochem., Vol. 107, pp. 267-272 (1990); Holm et al., Protein Engineering. Vol. 3, pp. 181-191 (1990); Takase et al., Biochemica et Biophvsica Acta. Vol. 1120, pp. 281-288 (1992); Matsui et al., FEBS Letters, Vol. 310, pp. 216-218 (1992); Matsui et al., Biochemistry. Vol. 33, pp. 451-458 (1992); Sogaard et al., J. Biol. Chem.. Vol. 268, pp. 22480-22484 (1993); Sogaard et al., Carbohydrate Polymers. Vol. 21 , pp. 137-146 (1993); Svensson, Plant Mol. Biol.. Vol. 25, pp. 141-157 (1994); Svensson et al., J. Biotech.. Vol. 29, pp. 1-37 (1993)). Researchers have also studied which residues are important for thermal stability (Suzuki et al., J. Biol. Chem. Vol. 264, pp. 18933-18938 (1989); Watanabe et al., Eur. J. Biochem.. Vol. 226, pp. 277-283 (1994)); and one group has used such methods to introduce mutations at various histidine residues in a Bacillus licheniformis amylase, the rationale being that Bacillus licheniformis amylase which is known to be relatively thermostable when compared to other similar Bacillus amylases, has an excess of histidines and, therefore, it was suggested that replacing a histidine could affect the thermostability of the enzyme. This work resulted in the identification of stabilizing mutations at the histidine residue at the +133 position and the alanine residue at position +209 (Declerck et al., J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 265, pp. 15481-15488 (1990); FR 2 665 178-A1 ; Joyet et al., Bio/Technology. Vol. 10, pp. 1579-1583 (1992)). Despite the advances made in the prior art, a need exists for an α-amylase which is more effective in commercial liquefaction processes but allowing activity at lower pH than currently practical. Additionally, a need exists for improved amylases having characteristics which makes them more effective under the conditions of detergent use. Because commercially available amylases are not acceptable under many conditions due to stability problems, for example, the high alkalinity and oxidant (bleach) levels associated with detergents, or temperatures under which they operate, there is a need for an amylase having altered, and preferably increased, performance profiles under such conditions. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to provide an α-amylase having altered performance profiles. It is a further object of the present invention to provide an α-amylase having improved stability at high temperature. Accordingly, the present invention provides an α-amylase having introduced therein a mutation comprising an addition, substitution or deletion at a residue corresponding to A210, H405 and/or T412 in Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase. In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the α-amylase is derived from a bacterial or a fungal source and comprises a substitution corresponding to Bacillus licheniformis. Most preferably, the α-amylase is derived from Bacillus and the mutations correspond to A210T, H405D and/or T412A in Bacillus licheniformis. The invention further comprises nucleic acids encoding such mutant amylases, vectors comprising such nucleic acids, host cells transformed with such vectors and methods of expressing mutant α-amylases utilizing such host cells. The invention further comprises the use of the mutant α-amylases according to the invention to liquefy starch in the starch processing pathway to glucose or other starch derivatives, as an additive in detergents such as laundry and dishwashing detergents, as a baking aid and for desizing of textiles. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 illustrates the DNA sequence of the gene for α-amylase from Bacillus licheniformis (NCIB 8061) (SEQ ID NO:1) and deduced amino acid sequence of the translation product (SEQ ID NO:2) as described by Gray et al., J. Bacteriology. Vol. 166, pp. 635-643 (1986). Figure 2 illustrates the amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO:3) of the mature α- amylase enzyme from Bacillus licheniformis. Figure 3 illustrates an alignment of the primary structures of three Bacillus α- amylases. The Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase (Am-Lich) (SEQ ID NO:4) is described by Gray et al., J. Bacteriology. Vol. 166, pp. 635-643 (1986); the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens α- amylase (Am-Amylo) (SEQ ID NO:5) is described by Takkinen et al., J. Biol. Chem.. Vol. 258, pp. 1007-1013 (1983); and the Bacillus stearothermophilus α-amylase (Am-Stearo) (SEQ ID NO:6) is described by lhara et al., J. Biochem.. Vol. 98, pp. 95-103 (1985). Figure 4 illustrates plasmid pHP13 wherein Cm refers to chloramphenicol resistance, Em refers to erythromycin resistance and Rep pTA1060 refers to the origin of replication from plasmid pTA1060. Figure 5 illustrates the pBLapr plasmid wherein BL AA refers to Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase gene; aprE refers to the promoter and signal peptide encoding region of the aprE gene; AmpR refers to the ampicillin resistant gene from pBR322; and CAT refers to the chloramphenicol resistance gene from pC194. Figure 6 illustrates the pHP.BL plasmid carrying the gene for Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase. DETAILED DESCRIPTION "α-Amylase" means an enzymatic activity which cleaves or hydrolyzes the α(1- 4)glycosidic bond, e.g., that in starch, amylopectin or amylose polymers. α-Amylase as used herein includes naturally occurring α-amylases as well as recombinant α-amylases. Preferred α-amylases in the present invention are those derived from Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens or Bacillus stearothermophilus, as well as fungal α-amylases such as those derived from Aspergillus (i.e., A. oryzae and A. nigeή. "Recombinant α-amylase" means an α-amylase in which the DNA sequence encoding the naturally occurring α-amylase is modified to produce a mutant DNA sequence which encodes the substitution, insertion or deletion of one or more amino acids in the α-amylase sequence compared to the naturally occurring α-amylase. "Expression vector" means a DNA construct comprising a DNA sequence which is operably linked to a suitable control sequence capable of effecting the expression of said DNA in a suitable host. Such control sequences may include a promoter to effect transcription, an optional operator sequence to control such transcription, a sequence encoding suitable mRNA ribosome-binding sites, and sequences which control termination of transcription and translation. A preferred promoter is the Bacillus subtilis aprE promoter. The vector may be a plasmid, a phage particle, or simply a potential genomic insert. Once transformed into a suitable host, the vector may replicate and function independently of the host genome, or may, in some instances, integrate into the genome itself. In the present specification, plasmid and vector are sometimes used interchangeably as the plasmid is the most commonly used form of vector at present. However, the invention is intended to include such other forms of expression vectors which serve equivalent functions and which are, or become, known in the art. "Host strain" or "host cell" means a suitable host for an expression vector comprising DNA encoding the α-amylase according to the present invention. Host cells useful in the present invention are generally procaryotic or eucaryotic hosts, including any transformable microorganism in which the expression of α-amylase according to the present invention can be achieved. Specifically, host strains of the same species or genus from which the α-amylase is derived are suitable, such as a Bacillus strain. Preferably, an α-amylase negative Bacillus strain (genes deleted) and/or an α-amylase and protease deleted Bacillus strain (AamyE, Aapr, Anpή is used. Host cells are transformed or transfected with vectors constructed using recombinant DNA techniques. Such transformed host cells are capable of either replicating vectors encoding the α-amylase and its variants (mutants) or expressing the desired α-amylase. "Liquefaction" or "liquefy" means a process by which starch is converted to shorter chain and less viscous dextrins. Generally, this process involves gelatinization of starch simultaneously with or followed by the addition of α-amylase. According to the present invention, a mutant α-amylase is provided that has introduced therein a substitution, addition or deletion at A210, H405 and/or T412. Deletion, addition or substitution of an amino acid as used herein refers to any modification of the amino acid sequence of the precursor α-amylase itself, but preferably refers to using genetic engineering to mutate a nucleic acid encoding the precursor α- amylase so as to encode the deleted, substituted or added residue in the expressed protein. The precursor α-amylases include naturally occurring α-amylases and recombinant α-amylases. Modification of the precursor DNA sequence which encodes the amino acid sequence of the precursor α-amylase can be by methods described herein and in commonly owned U.S. Patent Nos. 4,760,025 and 5,185,258, incorporated herein by reference. Also provided is a nucleic acid molecule (DNA) which encodes an amino acid sequence comprising the mutant α-amylase provided by the present invention, expression systems incorporating such DNA including vectors and phages, host cells transformed with such DNA, and anti-sense strands of DNA corresponding to the DNA molecule which encodes the amino acid sequence. Similarly, the present invention includes a method for producing a mutant α-amylase by expressing the DNA incorporated in an expression system which has been transformed into a host cell. The mutant α-amylase of the invention may be used in liquefaction of starch, as an ingredient in laundry detergents, automatic dishwashing detergents, hard surface cleaning products, in food processing including baking applications, in textile processing including as a desize agent, or in any other application in which α-amylase activity is useful. The precursor α-amylase is produced by any source capable of producing α- amylase. Suitable sources of α-amylases are prokaryotic or eukaryotic organisms, including fungi, bacteria, plants or animals. Preferably, the precursor α-amylase is produced by a Bacillus; more preferably, by Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens or Bacillus stearothermophilus; most preferably, the precursor α- amylase is derived from Bacillus licheniformis. Homologies have been found between almost all endo-amylases sequenced to date, ranging from plants, mammals, and bacteria (Nakajima et al., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.. Vol. 23, pp. 355-360 (1986); Rogers, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.. Vol. 128, pp. 470-476 (1985); Janecek, Eur. J. Biochem.. Vol. 224, pp. 519-524 (1994)). There are four areas of particularly high homology in certain Bacillus amylases, as shown in Figure 3, wherein the underlined sections designate the areas of high homology. Sequence alignments have also been used to map the relationship between Bacillus endo-amylases (Feng et al., J. Molec. Evol.. Vol. 35, pp. 351-360 (1987)). The relative sequence homology between Bacillus stearothermophilus and Bacillus licheniformis amylase is about 66% and that between Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens amylases is about 81 %, as determined by Holm et al., Protein Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 181-191 (1990). While sequence homology is important, it is generally recognized that structural homology is also important in comparing amylases or other enzymes. For example, structural homology between fungal amylases and bacterial amylase has been suggested and, therefore, fungal amylases are encompassed within the present invention. Among others, addition, deletion or substitution at residues corresponding to A210, H405 and/or T412 in Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase are identified herein. Thus, specific residues such as A210 refer to an amino acid position number (i.e., +210) which references the number assigned to the mature Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase sequence illustrated in Figure 1. The invention, however, is not limited to the mutation of the particular mature α-amylase of Bacillus licheniformis but extends to precursor α-amylases containing amino acid residues at positions which are equivalent to the particular identified residue in Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase. A residue of a precursor α-amylase is equivalent to a residue of Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase if it is either homologous (i.e., corresponds in position for either the primary or tertiary structure) or analogous to a specific residue or portion of that residue in Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase (i e , having the same or similar functional capacity to combine, react, or interact chemically or structurally) In order to establish homology to primary structure, the ammo acid sequence of a precursor α-amylase is directly compared to the Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase primary sequence and particularly to a set of residues known to be invariant to all α-amylases for which sequences are known (see e g , Figure 3) It is possible also to determine equivalent residues by tertiary structure analysis of the crystal structures reported for porcine pancreatic α-amylase (Buisson et al , EMBO Journal, Vol 6, pp 3909-3916 (1987), Qian et al , Biochemistry, Vol 33, pp 6284-6294 (1994), Larson et al , J Mol Biol , Vol 235, pp 1560-1584 (1994)), Taka-amylase A from Aspergillus oryzae (Matsuura et al . J Biochem (Tokyo), Vol 95, pp 697-702 (1984)) and an acid α-amylase from A niger (Boel et al Biochemistry. Vol 29, pp 6244-6249 (1990)), with the former two structures being similar, and for barley α-amylase (Vallee et al , J Mol Biol , Vol 236, pp 368-371(1994), Kadziola, J Mol Biol , Vol 239, pp 104-121 (1994)) Several preliminary studies have been published related to the secondary structure of α-amylase, i e , (Suzuki et al , J Biochem , Vol 108, pp 379-381 (1990) Lee et al Arch Biochem Biophvs. Vol 291 , pp 255-257 (1991), Chang et al , J Mol Biol , Vol 229, pp 235-238 (1993), Mizuno et al , J Mol Biol , Vol 234, pp 1282-1283 (1993)) and at least one structure has been published for crystalline Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase (Machius et al , J Mol Biol Vol 246, pp 545-549 (1995)) However, several researchers have predicted common super- secondary structures between glucanases (MacGregor et al , Biochem J , Vol 259, pp 145-152 (1989)) and within α-amylases and other starch-metabolising enzymes (Jaspersen, J Prot Chem Vol 12, pp 791-805 (1993), MacGregor, Starke. Vol 45, pp 232-237 (1993)), and sequence similarities between enzymes with similar super- secondary structures to α-amylases (Janecek, FEBS Letters, Vol 316, pp 23-26 (1993), Janecek et al , J Prot Chem , Vol 12, pp 509-514 (1993)) A structure for the Bacillus stearothermophilus enzyme has been modeled on that of Taka-amylase A (Holm et al , Protein Engineering, Vol 3, pp 181-191 (1990)) The four highly conserved regions shown in Figure 3 contain many residues thought to be part of the active-site (Matsuura et al , J Biochem (Tokyo), Vol 95, pp 697-702 (1984), Buisson et al , EMBO Journal. Vol 6, pp 3909-3916 (1987), Vihinen et al , J Biochem , Vol 107, pp 267-272 (1990)) including His +105, Arg +229, Asp +231 , His +235, Glu +261 and Asp +328 under the Bacillus licheniformis numbering system α-Amylases according to the present invention which exhibit altered performance characteristics providing desirable and unexpected results are useful in the various applications for which α-amylases are commonly used. For example, α-amylases according to the present invention which exhibit altered performance characteristics at low pH, including improved thermostability, improved pH stability and/or improved oxidative stability, are useful in low pH liquefaction of starch. Enhanced thermostability will be useful in extending the shelf life of products which incorporate them. Enhanced oxidative stability or improved performance is particularly desirable in cleaning products, and for extending the shelf life of α-amylase in the presence of bleach, perborate, percarbonate or peracids used in such cleaning products. To the contrary, reduced thermal stability or oxidative stability may be useful in industrial processes which require the rapid and efficient quenching of amylolytic activity. α-Amylases of the present invention which exhibit improved low pH stability will be especially useful in starch processing and particularly in starch liquefaction. Conditions present during commercially desirable liquefaction processes characteristically include low pH, high temperature and potential oxidation conditions requiring α-amylases exhibiting improved low pH performance, improved thermal stability and improved oxidative stability. Accordingly, α-amylases according to the present invention which are particularly useful in liquefaction exhibit improved performance at a pH of less than about 6, preferably less than about 5.5, and most preferably less than about 5.0. Additionally, α-amylases according to the present invention which exhibit increased thermal stability at temperatures of between about 80-120°C, and preferably between about 100-110°C, and increased stability in the presence of oxidants will be particularly useful. Additional components known by those skilled in the art to be useful in liquefaction, including, for example, antioxidants, calcium, ions, salts or other enzymes such as endoglycosidases, cellulases, proteases, lipases or other amylase enzymes may be added depending on the intended reaction conditions. For example, combinations of the α- amylase according to the present invention with α-amylases from other sources may provide unique action profiles which find particular use under specific liquefaction conditions. In particular, it is contemplated that the combination of the α-amylase according to the present invention with α-amylase derived from Bacillus stearothermophilus will provide enhanced liquefaction at pH values below 5.5 due to complementary action patterns. During liquefaction, starch, specifically granular starch slurries from either a wet or dry milled process, is treated with an α-amylase of the present invention according to known liquefaction techniques. Generally, in the first step of the starch degradation process, the starch slurry is gelatinized by heating at a relatively high temperature (between about 80° C and about 110°C). After the starch slurry is gelatinized, it is liquefied using an α-amylase. In another embodiment of the present invention, detergent compositions in either liquid, gel or granular form, which comprise the α-amylase according to the present invention may be useful. Such detergent compositions will particularly benefit from the addition of an α-amylase according to the present invention which has increased thermal stability to improve shelf-life or increased oxidative stability such that the α-amylase has improved resistance to bleach or peracid compounds commonly present in detergents. Thus, α-amylase according to the present invention may be advantageously formulated into known powdered, liquid or gel detergents having a pH of between about 6.5 and about 12.0. Detergent compositions comprising the α-amylase according to the present invention may further include other enzymes such as endoglycosidases, cellulases, proteases, lipases or other amylase enzymes, particularly α-amylase derived from Bacillus stearothermophilus, as well as additional ingredients as generally known in the art. A preferred embodiment of the present invention further comprises, in addition to the substitution, addition or deletion of residues as provided herein, any one or more of the substitutions known in the art to confer stability or increased activity. For example, the deletion or substitution of a methionine residue or a tryptophan residue, for example M15, M 197 or W138 as described in WO 94/18314, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference; substitution at H133Y as described in PCT Publication No. WO 91/00353; or substitution at A209 as described in DeClerck, et al., J. Biol. Chem.. Vol. 265, pp. 15481- 15488 (1990); or any of the substitutions described in PCT Publication Nos. WO 95/10603, WO 96/23873 and WO 96/23874. In particularly preferred embodiments, the α- amylase according to the present invention may further comprise a deletion or substitution at one or more residues corresponding to M15, A33, A52, S85, N96, V129, H133, S148, S187, 188, A209, A269 and/or A379 in Bacillus licheniformis. Embodiments of the present invention which comprise a combination of the α- amylase according to the present invention with protease enzymes preferably include oxidatively stable proteases such as those described in U.S. Re. 34,606, incorporated herein by reference, as well as commercially available enzymes such as DURAZYM (Novo Nordisk) and PURAFECT ® OxP (Genencor International, Inc.). Methods for making such protease mutants (oxidatively stable proteases), and particularly such mutants having a substitution for the methionine at a position equivalent to M222 in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, are described in U.S. Re. 34,606. An additional embodiment of the present invention comprises DNA encoding an α- amylase according to the present invention and expression vectors comprising such DNA. The DNA sequences may be expressed by operably linking them to an expression control sequence in an appropriate expression vector and employing that expression vector to transform an appropriate host according to well known techniques. A wide variety of host/expression vector combinations may be employed in expressing the DNA sequences of this invention. Useful expression vectors, for example, include segments of chromosomal, non-chromosomal and synthetic DNA sequences, such as the various known plasmids and phages useful for this purpose. In addition, any of a wide variety of expression control sequences are generally used in these vectors. For example, Applicants have discovered that a preferred expression control sequence for Bacillus transformants is the aprE signal peptide derived from Bacillus subtilis. A wide variety of host cells are also useful in expressing the DNA sequences of this invention. These hosts may include well known eukaryotic and prokaryotic hosts, such as strains of E. coli, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Streptomyces, various fungi, yeast and animal cells. Preferably, the host expresses the α-amylase of the present invention extracellulariy to facilitate purification and downstream processing. Expression and purification of the mutant α-amylase of the invention may be effected through art-recognized means for carrying out such processes. The improved α-amylases according to the present invention are contemplated to provide important advantages when compared to wild type Bacillus α-amylases. For example, one advantage is the increased activity found at low pH and high temperatures typical of common starch liquefaction methods. Other advantages may include increased high pH and oxidative stability which facilitates their use in detergents; more complete hydrolysis of starch molecules is achieved which reduces residual starch in the processing stream; improved stability in the absence of calcium ion; and that the addition of equal protein doses of α-amylase according to the invention may provide superior performance when compared to wild type Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase due to improvements in both specific activity and stability under stressed conditions. The following is presented by way of example and is not to be construed as a limitation to the scope of the claims. Abbreviations used herein, particularly three letter or one letter notations for amino acids are described in Dale, J.W., Molecular Genetics of Bacteria, John Wiley & Sons, (1989) Appendix B. EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1 Construction Of Plasmid pHP.BL The α-amylase gene shown in Figure 1 was cloned from Bacillus licheniformis NCIB8061 (Gray et al., J. Bacteriology. Vol. 166, pp. 635-643 (1986)). The 1.72kb Pstl- Sstl fragment, encoding the last three residues of the signal sequence, the entire mature protein and the terminator region, was subcloned into M13mp18. A synthetic terminator was added between the Bell and Sstl sites using a synthetic oligonucleotide cassette of the form: 5'-GATCAAAACATAAAAAACCGGCCTTGGCCCCGCCGGTTTTTTATTATTTTTGAGCT-3' (SEQ ID N0:7) 3'-TTTTGTATTTTTTGGCCGGAACCGGGGCGGCCAAAAAATAATAAAAAC-5' (SEQ ID NO:8) designed to contain the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin transcriptional terminator (Wells et al.. Nucleic Acid Research. Vol. 11 , pp. 7911-7925 (1983)). The pBLapr plasmid was constructed carrying the gene for the Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase. As illustrated in Figure 5, pBLapr comprises a 6.1kb plasmid including the ampicillin resistance gene from pBR322 and the chloramphenicol resistance gene from pC194, the aprE promoter and the gene encoding for the Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase ("BL AA"). The aprE promoter was constructed from a 660bp Hindlll-Pstl fragment encoding for the promoter and signal sequence of the Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease. The Pstl site was removed, and an Sfil site added close to the aprE/BL AA junction. The BL AA gene comprises the 1720 bp Pstl-Sstl fragment described above. In the work described herein, pBLapr was constructed with an Sfil site adjacent to the 5' end of the start of the coding sequence for the mature amylase gene. Specifically, the 5' end of the pBLapr construction was subcloned on an EcoRI-Sstll fragment from pBLapr into M13BM20 (Boehringer Mannheim) to obtain a coding-strand template for the mutagenic oligonucleotide below: 5'- CCC ATT AAG ATT GGC CGC CTG GGC CGA CAT GTT GCT GG - 3' (SEQ ID NO:9) This primer introduced an Sfil site (indicated by underlining) which allowed correct forms to be screened for by the presence of this unique restriction site. Subcloning the EcoRI-Sstll fragment back into the pBLapr vector gave a version of the plasmid containing an Sfil site. Plasmid pHP13 (Haima et al., Mol. Gen. Genet.. Vol. 209, pp. 335-342 (1987)) (Figure 4) was digested with restriction enzymes EcoRI and Hindlll and the resulting vector purified on a polyacrymide gel and then eluted. Plasmid pBLapr was digested with Hindlll, Asp718 and in a separate incubation with Asp718, EcoRI and gel purified. Two bands, Hindlll-Asp718 (1203 bp) and Asp718-EcoRI (1253 bp)were gel purified, eluted from the gel and ligated into the vector by a 3-way ligation, to give plasmid pHP.BL, the plasmid used in expression of the α-amylase (Figure 6). EXAMPLE 2 Construction Of Plasmid Encoding α-Amylase Comprising A210T/H405A/T412D A pBLapr plasmid having threonine substituted for methionine at amino acid 15 was constructed according to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/194,664 (PCT Publication No. WO 94/18314). To introduce the mutations, the following mutagenic primers encoding for substitutions of A210T/M405D/T412A are used together with non- mutagenic primers to introduce the desired mutations into linear multiple tandem repeats of the plasmid by the method of multimerization as described below. H405D ( (411 ) CCA GCC GAC AAT GTC ATG GTC GTC GAA ATA ATC (401 ) (SEQ ID NO: 10) A210T (R) (206) CCT GAT GTC GCA ACA GAA ATT AAG AGA TGG (215) (SEQ ID NO:11 ) T412A (U (416) GTC GCC TTC CCT TGC CCA GCC GAC AAT GTC (407) (SEQ ID NO:12) A fragment starting at the appropriate mutagenic primer for the desired mutation (shown above) and ending at the end of the non-mutagenic primer is generated by PCR. This fragment is gel purified and used to generate long, linear tandem repeats of the plasmid encoding the desired mutations as follows: The vector (pBLapr) is linearized by restriction digest (Sal I) and purified using Qiagen kits. The multimerization reactions typically contain 5.4 mM Tris buffer pH 8.0, 1x XL buffer (Perkin Elmer, Branchburg, NJ), 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1.1 mM Mg(OAc) 2 , 3 ng/μl incoming fragment, 0.15 ng/μl linearized vector, 4 U rTth DNA polymerase, XL (Perkin Elmer) in 100 μl reaction mixture. PCR reactions are typically performed in a thermocycler under the following conditions: 20 cycles (15s 94°C, 5 min 68°C) and 15 cycles (15s 94°C, 10 min 68°C). The resulting multimers are transformed directly into B. subtilis competent cells using standard techniques. Plasmid DNA is isolated from the transformants using standard techniques. Mutations were confirmed by dideoxy sequencing (Sanger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.. Vol. 74, pp. 5463-5467 (1977)). EXAMPLE 3 Transformation Of Plasmids Into Bacillus subtilis, Expression And Purification of Mutant α-Amylase α-Amylase may be expressed in Bacillus subtilis after transformation with the plasmids described above. pHP13 is a plasmid able to replicate in E. coli and in Bacillus subtilis. Plasmids containing different variants were constructed using E. coli strain MM294, the plasmids isolated and then transformed into Bacillus subtilis as described in Anagnostopoulos et al., J. Bacter., Vol. 81 , pp. 741-746 (1961). The Bacillus strain had been deleted for two proteases (Δapr, Δnpr) (see e.g., Ferrari et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,264,366) and for amylase (AamyE) (see e.g., Stahl et al., J. Bacter.. Vol. 158, pp. 411- 418 (1984)). After transformation, the sacU(Hy) mutation (Henner et al., J. Bacter., Vol., 170, pp. 296-300 (1988)) was introduced by PBS-1 mediated transduction (Hoch, J. Bact.. Vol. 154, pp. 1513-1515 (1983)). Secreted amylase was recovered from Bacillus subtilis cultures as follows: Sodium chloride was added to the culture supernatant to 20mM and the pH was adjusted to approximately 7.0 with 1M tris buffer, pH 7.2. The supernatant was then heated to 70°C for 15 minutes, and the precipitate removed by centrifugation. Ammonium sulphate was added the supernatant to 1.3M followed by 20ml phenyl sepharose fast flow 6 (high substitution) resin (Pharmacia). Following agitation, resin was separated by filtration, and washed in 1M ammonium sulphate, 20mM ammonium acetate pH 7.0, 5mM calcium chloride. The bound amylase was eluted into 20mM ammonium acetate pH 7.0, 5mM calcium chloride, and precipated by addition of ammonium sulphate to 70% saturation. The precipated material was pelleted by centrifugation, redissolved in a minimum volume of 20mM ammonium acetate pH 7.0, 5mM calcium chloride and dialysed against the same buffer. Concentration was determined using the soluble substrate assay, assuming wild- type specific activity. EXAMPLE 4 Assay For Determining α-Amylase Activity Soluble Substrate Assay: A rate assay was developed based on an end-point assay kit supplied by Megazyme (Aust.) Pty. Ltd. A vial of substrate (p-nitrophenyl maltoheptaoside, BPNPG7) was dissolved in 10ml of sterile water followed by a 1 :4 dilution in assay buffer (50mM maleate buffer, pH 6.7, 5mM calcium chloride, 0.002% Tween20). Assays were performed by adding 10μl of amylase to 790μl of the substrate in a cuvette at 25°C. Rates of hydrolysis were measured as the rate of change of absorbance at 410nm, after a delay of 75 seconds. The assay was linear up to rates of 0.2 absorption units/min. α-Amylase protein concentration was measured using the standard Bio-Rad Assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories) based on the method of Bradford, Anal. Biochem.. Vol. 72, p. 248 (1976) using bovine serum albumin standards. EXAMPLE 5 Preparation and Testing of Additional Mutant Alpha-Amylases for Thermal Stability Mutant B. licheniformis alpha-amylase was prepared having substitutions at A210T/H405D/T412A. Thermal inactivation rate for the mutant was measured according to the following procedure. Amylase stock solutions were dialysed extensively into 20 mM ammonium acetate, 4 mM CaCI 2 pH 6.5. Each sample was stored at 4°C. For measurement of stability, this stock was diluted >50fold into 50mM ammonium acetate, 5mM CaCI 2 , 0.02% Tween 20 pH 4.8 to a final concentration of between 30 and 50 μg/ml. Six 100μl aliquots were put into eppendorf tubes and placed into a water bath or hot block at 83 ° C. The eppendorf tubes were removed at regular, measured intervals of between 30 seconds and 5 minutes and placed on ice to stop the inactivation. The residual activity was assayed using a soluble substrate as described in Example 4. The natural log of the activity was plotted against time of incubation, and the rate constant for inactivation obtained from the slope of the straight line. Results are provided in Table 1. TABLE 1 As shown in Table 1 , mutant enzymes having introduced therein the mutations according to the invention have significantly improved stability under the conditions of the assay.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A mutant α-amylase which is derived from a precursor α-amylase by the deletion, substitution or addition to said precursor α-amylase of a residue corresponding to A210, H405 and/or T412 in Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase. 2. The mutant α-amylase according to claim 1 , wherein said mutation comprises deletion, substitution or addition at two or more of A210, H405 and/or T412 in Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase. 3. The α-amylase according to claim 2, wherein said α-amylase comprises a substitution corresponding to A210T/H405D/T412A in Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase. 4. The α-amylase according to claim 1 , wherein said α-amylase is derived from a bacterial or fungal source. 5. The α-amylase according to claim 1 , wherein said α-amylase is derived from Bacillus. 6. The α-amylase according to claim 5, wherein said α-amylase is derived from Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus stearothermophilus or Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. 7. The α-amylase according to claim 1 wherein said α-amylase further comprises the deletion or substitution of a residue corresponding to M15, A33, A52, S85, N96, V129, H133, S148N, S187, N188, A209, A269 and/or A379 in Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase. 8. The α-amylase according to claim 1 , wherein substitution further comprises substituting or deleting a residue corresponding to M15T, W138Y and/or M197T in Bacillus licheniformis. 9. A DNA encoding the α-amylase according to claim 1. 10. An expression vector comprising the DNA of claim 9. 11. A host cell transformed with the expression vector of claim 10. 12. An α-amylase according to claims 1 , 3 or 7 having enhanced low pH performance and/or increased thermostability. 13. A detergent composition comprising the α-amylase according to claim 1. 14. The detergent composition according to claim 13, wherein said detergent is useful for cleaning soiled laundry and/or soiled dishes. 15. A method of liquefying starch comprising contacting a slurry of starch with the α-amylase according to claim 1.

Inventors: DAY ANTHONY, SWANSON BARBARA, DAY, ANTHONY, SWANSON, BARBARA
Applicants: GENENCOR INT, GENENCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Application year: 1998
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: C11D3, C12N9, C12N15