PROCESS OF MANUFACTURING AN ELECTROLYTIC CELL WITH RHODIUM ELECTRODES USEFUL FOR MEASURING WATER IN OXYGEN, HYDROGEN, AND INERT GASES

Abstract: An improved process for manufacturing a detecting unit for an electrolytic cell with rhodium electrodes. In the first step of the process, rhodium electrodes are prepared from relatively impure rhodium metal by (a) vacuum melting the rhodium metal, (b) cold drawing the rhodium metal into rhodium electrodes, and (c) cleaning the rhodium electrodes. Then, the rhodium electrodes are sealed and embedded in the glass tube of the detecting unit. The detecting unit having the embedded rhodium electrodes is cleaned with a hot acid solution. Finally, the detecting unit is placed in the electrolytic cell. The electrolytic cell manufactured according to the process permits rhodium electrodes to be used to measure water in a sample gas comprising oxygen, hydrogen, or an inert gas; therefore, one electrode material is suitable for all applications. It is no longer necessary to provide different cells depending upon the application (sample gas containing oxygen or hydrogen or an inert gas) of interest.

Description: PROCESS OF MANUFACTURING AN ELECTROLYTIC CELL WITH RHODIUM ELECTRODES USEFUL FOR MEASURING WATER IN OXYGEN, HYDROGEN, AND INERT GASES Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a process of manufacturing an electrolytic cell with rhodium electrodes for automatically measuring the concentration of water in a sample gas flow, which may contain at least substantial amounts of hydrogen or oxygen, through the use of electrolytic hygrometry. More specifically, the process forms and treats the rhodium electrodes of the cell to suppress the error-causing recombination effect. Background of the Invention In many industrial processes, the presence and amount of even minute moisture concentrations in flowing gas streams must be detected and measured with a high degree of speed and accuracy. The process of manufacturing semiconductors uses flowing gas streams, for example, and any moisture present in those streams affects production yield. If moisture concentrations exceed specified limits, the contaminated gas stream may produce, at considerable expense, an unacceptable semiconductor lot. Thus, detection and measurement of moisture concentration in industrial processes such as semiconductor production is required because moisture is often critical to the quality of the product made. To meet the industrial demand, sensitive hygrometers are available which have extremely low detection and measurement limits. The most sensitive and commercially available hygrometers can detect and measure moisture concentrations on the order of ten parts per billion (ppb) by volume-although modern, high-purity hygrometers may reach limits of a few ppb. The prior art is replete with a variety of water detection and measurement devices, or hygrometers. These include infrared absorption-type hygrometers, conductivity cells, piezoelectric hygrometers, impedance- type hygrometers, mirror dew point apparatuses, gas chromatographs (which may include an electron capture detector), and electrolytic hygrometers. A general discussion of such devices is found in United States Patent No. 4,535,620, issued to Richard D. Cunningham. K. Sugiyama & T. Ohmi, "Ultraclean Gas Delivery Systems-Part I," in Microcontamination at 49-54 (Nov. 1988), discloses that gases with moisture levels on the order of two parts per billion can be produced and that such levels can be measured by Atmospheric Pressure Ionization Mass Spectrometry (APIMS). See also T. Kimura, J. Mettes & M. Schack, "Sub-ppb Analysis of Nitrogen Gas by APIMS," presented at the Technical Symposium of SEMICON EAST 89 in Boston, Mass. (Sept. 1989) (disclosing an experimental setup and a procedure for the analysis of high-purity nitrogen). The present invention focuses on the electrolytic hygrometer. This type of hygrometer operates under the principles of Faraday's Law and incorporates an electrolytic cell as the analytical component. One configuration of an electrolytic cell consists of a hollow glass tube with two electrodes helically wound around the inside and covered with a hygroscopic film such as phosphorous pentoxide (P 2 O 5 ). The two electrodes, one a positive anode and the other a negative cathode, form a double helix. Typically, the electrodes are made of a noble metal such as platinum, gold, or -rhodium. The gas to be measured flows through the cell with a known flow rate. The water concentration of the gas is determined in the following manner. The hygroscopic film absorbs the water from the gas. A voltage is supplied across the electrodes, which electrolyzes the water in the film into hydrogen and oxygen. The generated current is a measure of the rate at which the water molecules are electrolyzed. Once equilibrium is reached, the rate at which water molecules enter the cell will exactly match the rate at which such molecules are electrolyzed. Consequently, at a given flow rate the water concentration in the gas will be known without any further calibration. An example of a conventional electrolytic cell is described in United States Patent No. 4,800,000 to D.A. Zatko. A phenomenon called the "recombination effect" can create large errors in the measurement of such electrolytic cells when the sample gas contains substantial amounts of hydrogen or oxygen. The effect refers to the recombination, if a catalyst is present, of hydrogen and oxygen in the cell to re-form water. Thus, a single water molecule can be detected more than once. The catalytic reaction of hydrogen and oxygen will occur on the surface of the precious metal electrodes. Both the noble metals and their oxides catalyze the recombination reaction. The recombination effect is negligible in inert gases because hydrogen and oxygen produced by electrolysis are present only in very low concentrations. Thus, the probability of molecular collision and reaction of those species is exceedingly small. When the carrier gas contains substantial concentrations of hydrogen or oxygen, however, the probability of reaction increases. In hydrogen gas, for example, oxygen produced by electrolysis can easily collide with surrounding hydrogen and recombine to form water. The mechanisms for electrolysis and recombination differ. The former is a forced reaction which occurs with energy input at the metal electrodes under the influence of a powerful DC electric field; recombination requires a catalyst and is highly exothermic. Electrolytic hygrometry, the recombination effect, and the factors which affect recombination are described in D. Smith & J. Mitchell, Jr., Aquametry (Part U), pages 661-675 (2d ed. 1984); U.S. Patent No. 4,707,244 issued to Harman, m et al.; U.S. Patent No. 4,210,508 issued to Bergson; and U.S. Patent No. 3,223,609 issued to Reeds, Jr. In particular, the Aquametry reference suggests that the problem of recombination can be addressed by eliminating surface deposits on the metal electrode wires. The reference specifically notes that soaking platinum, gold, or rhodium wires in hot HC1 solution will remove oxides from those metals. The reference also suggests that recombination fostered by rhodium electrodes can be nearly eliminated by lowering the temperature and the current density of the cell and by diluting the sample gas with pure, dry nitrogen. Although the Aquametry reference generally describes soaking rhodium wires in hot HC1 solution to remove oxides as a possible way to reduce recombination, that reference nowhere suggests that such a treatment might effectively eliminate recombination in combination with particular rhodium electrode forming processes. Moreover, the reference's disclosure is based only on a review of the literature current as of 1984 and, in fact, is purely speculative; the effects on recombination of an HC1- cleansing step as applied to rhodium electrodes were not explored experimentally. Finally, the reference does not teach what other steps might be taken to facilitate use of rhodium electrodes in gases containing hydrogen, oxygen, or both. A large number of references teach the use of rhodium electrodes. See, for example, U.S. Patent No. 4,990,236 issued to Sittler et al. (column 4, lines 41-43); U.S. Patent No. 4,925,646 issued to Tom et al. (column 13, lines 17-19); and U.S. Patent No. 4,842,709 issued to Mayeaux (column 4, lines 20-21). To date, rhodium electrodes have been preferred when the application of interest requires measurement of water in a sample gas stream having significant amounts of hydrogen. Platinum electrodes are preferred for measuring water in a sample gas stream having significant amounts of oxygen. This conventional wisdom is summarized, for example, in U.S. Patent No. 4,210,508 issued to Bergson: "Thus platinum is found to behave better with oxygen than does rhodium while rhodium behaves better with hydrogen than does platinum. Behaving better here has the significance that there is a greater catalytic recombination of hydrogen and oxygen in an oxygen stream with a rhodium cell than with a platinum cell while the reverse is true when the stream is one of hydrogen gas. " Column 2, lines 30-37. The problems experienced when using platinum electrodes in a sample gas stream having significant amounts of hydrogen are described in U.S. Patent No. 3,223,609 issued to Reeds, Jr. After a period of use, a black deposit, apparently platinum or a platinum compound, forms between the platinum electrodes. The deposit eventually builds up to a point where it forms a metallic bridge between adjacent turns of the electrodes and, because it is electrically conductive, the deposit causes a short circuit between the electrodes which results in cell failure. In addition, the inaccuracy of a cell using platinum electrodes in gas streams comprising more than fifty percent hydrogen is attributed primarily to recombination of the oxygen liberated by the electrolysis with the hydrogen stream, thus creating additional water which is again electrolyzed-possibly several times. The recombination of hydrogen and oxygen is apparently catalyzed by the presence of platinum or platinum compounds in the cell; both the electrodes themselves and the deposits between them have an effect on the rate of recombination. Column 1, line 51, to column 2, line 2. Reeds, Jr. patented an electrolytic hygrometer cell having at least one rhodium electrode. That cell ostensibly solved the problems experienced when using platinum electrodes in a sample gas stream having significant amounts of hydrogen. Thus, it has been necessary to provide different cells depending upon the application (sample gas having oxygen or hydrogen or an inert gas) of interest. Platinum electrodes enhance recombination by a factor of about 1.6 in oxygen; rhodium electrodes enhance recombination by a factor of about four in hydrogen. Even when the preferred electrode material is used, recombination is a problem because the noble metals enhance recombination. To overcome the problem of recombination in electrolytic hygrometers, an improved process of manufacturing an electrolytic cell is provided. An object of the present invention is to provide an electrolytic cell that minimizes recombination errors when used to measure the concentration of water in a sample gas flow containing at least substantial amounts of hydrogen or oxygen. Another object is to provide such a process which will allow rhodium electrodes to be used to measure water in oxygen or hydrogen or inert gases; therefore, one electrode material is suitable for a variety of applications. Summary of the Invention To achieve these and other objects, and in view of its purposes, the present invention provides an improved process of manufacturing a detecting unit for an electrolytic cell with rhodium electrodes. In the first step of the process, rhodium electrodes are preparing from relatively impure rhodium metal by (a) vacuum melting the rhodium metal, (b) cold drawing the rhodium metal into rhodium electrodes, and (c) cleaning the rhodium electrodes. Then, the rhodium electrodes are sealed and embedded in the glass tube of the detecting unit. The detecting unit having the embedded rhodium electrodes is cleaned with a hot acid solution. Finally, the detecting unit is placed in the electrolytic cell. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary, but are not restrictive, of the invention. Brief Description of the Drawing The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in connection with the accompanying drawing. It is emphasized that, according to common practice, the various features of the drawing are not to scale. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features are arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity. Included in the drawing are the following figures: FIG. 1 is a longitudinal, cross-sectional view of a conventional type I electrolytic cell as disclosed in United States Patent No. 4,800,000 to D. Zatko; FIG. 2 illustrates the mandrel and the rotating winder used in the conventional process to fabricate the detecting unit of the electrolytic cell shown in FIG. i; FIG. 3 illustrates the sealing device used in the conventional process to fabricate the detecting unit of the electrolytic cell shown in FIG. 1; FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the steps of the preferred embodiment of the improved process, according to the present invention, for manufacturing the detecting unit of an electrolytic cell with rhodium electrodes; FIG. 5 shows the output response (as a graph) of a first electrolytic hygrometer, manufactured according to the present invention, to the introduction of an oxygen sample gas stream; FIG. 6 shows the output response of a second electrolytic hygrometer, also manufactured according to the present invention, to the introduction of an oxygen sample gas stream; Fig. 7 shows the output response of a conventional hygrometer used to measure the moisture concentration in a sample gas stream having a substantial concentration of hydrogen, illustrating the problem caused by the effect of recombination in the presence of hydrogen; Fig. 8 shows the output response (as a graph) of a first electrolytic hygrometer, manufactured according to the present invention, to the introduction of a hydrogen sample gas stream; and Fig. 9 shows the output response of a second electrolytic hygrometer, also manufactured according to the present invention, to the introduction of a hydrogen sample gas stream. Detailed Description of the Invention Referring now to the drawing, like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout. FIG. 1 illustrates that an electrolytic cell 10 is known which includes a tubular glass detecting unit 12. Detecting unit 12 passes a gas and has an inlet 14 and an outlet 16. Unit 12 is positioned concentrically in a stainless steel protective housing 18. A packing material 20, typically an epoxy potting compound, fills the concentric area between unit 12 and housing 18. An inlet plug 22 surrounds and concentrically positions unit 12 at the inlet end of cell 10. An inlet cap 24 is mounted in sealing engagement with a gasket 26 on the upper end of housing 18, and is fixed in position by a nut 28. Fittings 30, 32 are mounted as arms transversely of cap 24 and attach gas inlet and bypass gas outlet lines, respectively (not shown). Channel 34 conveys gas from fitting 30 through cap 24 to inlet 14 of unit 12. Channel 36 is a bypass conduit connecting cap 24 to fitting 32 to pass gas from a source connected to fitting 30 to a collector connected to fitting 32. Extending through plug 22 is a tube 38 to admit epoxy 20 during manufacture of cell 10. Tube 38 is plugged upon setting by epoxy 20. The outlet end of unit 12 is concentrically positioned in housing 18 by plug 40. Electrode leads 42, 44, positioned in plug 40, are connected to the free ends of wires 46, 48 helically covering the interior of unit 12. Wires 46, 48 are usually made of platinum, indium, rhodium, or another noble metal. Gold may also be suitable. A bottom cap 50 seats on a gasket 52 and is sealed to and mounted on housing 18 by a nut 54. A gas outlet fitting 56 is mounted in cap 50 as a side arm and receives gas from the interior of cap 50 and unit 12 via a channel 58. Lead 42 extends externally of housing 18 through an electrically insulating packing 60 within a metallic contact arm 62 having a soldered tip 64. Similarly, lead 44 is received in an electrically insulating packing 66 in a metallic contact arm 68 mounted in housing 18 and having a soldered tip 70. Wires 46, 48 are helically wound substantially the full length of unit 12 and are exposed to gas passing from inlet 14 to outlet 16. The interior of unit 12, including wires 46, 48, is coated with a water absorbent (hygroscopic) film (such as phosphorous pentoxide, not shown) which will conduct the ions resulting from electrolysis of the moisture between the two electrodes. The electrolysis current will match the rate at which moisture molecules enter unit 12 when the system is in equilibrium. Detecting unit 12 is very long and narrow (on the order of 1 mm inside diameter and 100 mm length) to ensure that substantially all of the moisture in the gas contacts the hygroscopic film. Consequently, all water in the gas passing through detecting unit 12 will be subjected to electrolysis. In moisture analysis by electrolytic hygrometry, water reacts with the hygroscopic film in contact with wires 46, 48 in electrolytic cell 10. The water in the film is electrolyzed by an applied voltage to produce hydrogen and oxygen. The resulting current is an absolute measure of the rate of water absorption by the cell under Faraday's Law. Erroneously high water readings for electrolytic hygrometers are caused by the recombination of hydrogen and oxygen to re-form water when the sample gas contains substantial amounts of hydrogen or oxygen. The recombination reaction proceeds according to the formula: catalyst H 2 + 1/2 O2 > H 2 O. Both the noble metals and their oxides catalyze the recombination reaction. In fact, a main source of recombination is the catalytic activity of electrode wires 46, 48 in electrolytic cell 10. Minimization of recombination errors is important when an electrolytic hygrometer is used for industrial applications. It is important, for example, in the semiconductor industry where monitoring and controlling moisture in hydrogen- or oxygen-containing atmospheres affects product yield and quality. The traditional way to fabricate detecting unit 12 of electrolytic cell 10 begins with a stainless steel mandrel 80 (see FIG. 2). Two, thin, platinum or rhodium wires 46, 48, alternating with two, thin copper wires 82, 84, are wound tightly around mandrel 80 using a rotating winder 86. Copper wires 82, 84 hold wires 46, 48 in place on mandrel 80. Wires 46, 48 and copper wires 82, 84 may each have a diameter of about 0.125 mm. The ends of the wires 46, 48, 82, 84 are welded at a predetermined length corcesponding to the length of detecting unit 12 desired. Then, mandrel 80, with wires 46, 48, 82, 84 wound around it, is removed from winder 86. Wound mandrel 80 is placed in the sealing device 90 shown in FIG. 3. Sealing device 90 may be rotated as shown by arrow A. Opposite ends of mandrel 80 are held by opposing chucks 92, 94. A heating coil 96 surrounds mandrel 80. Also sunounding mandrel 80 is the glass tube 98 which will be used to form detecting unit 12. Three, separate steps are performed, during the manufacture of detecting unit 12, in sealing device 90. First, the step of preheating is performed. The second step performed in sealing device 90 is to shift (in the direction of the dotted arrow B) glass tube 98 over wires 46, 48, 82, 84 on mandrel 80. Glass tube 98 assumes the position shown by the dotted lines in Fig. 3. Finally, wires 46, 48, 82, 84 are sealed in glass tube 98. This sealing step involves passing heating coil 96 over glass tube 98 in the direction of arrow C. The temperature of heating coil 96 is sufficient to melt glass tube 98 so that glass flows down approximately half the diameter of wires 46, 48, 82, 84 before the glass resolidifies or hardens. Consequently, electrode wires 46, 48 will extend inside the diameter of detecting unit 12 by about half their diameter, thereby providing adequate area for contact with the gas stream under test. Once wires 46, 48, 82, 84 are sealed in glass tube 98, mandrel 80 is placed in a pulling device (not shown). Opposite ends of the mandrel are grasped and pulled by the device. Mandrel 80 is stretched and, therefore, becomes thinner. This allows mandrel 80 to slide out from wires 46, 48, 82, 84 and glass tube 98, leaving glass tube 98 with wires 46, 48, 82, 84 sealed inside glass tube 98. Copper wires 82, 84, having performed their function, are then dissolved in strong nitric acid (HNO3). Glass tube 98 is installed in housing 18. Finally, the hygroscopic film (typically phosphorous pentoxide, P2O5) is deposited on the inner diameter of glass tube 98 and over electrode wires 46, 48. All of these steps are well known in the art. Thus, the conventional fabrication of detecting unit 12 of electrolytic hygrometer 10 requires a delicate process wherein glass tube 98 is melted in a manner designed to half cover the thin electrode wire coil when it hardens. This step is not only difficult to reproduce, it poses numerous quality problems. As an example, bubbles in the glass and poor (electrode) metal-to-glass contact cause rejects and reduce manufacturing yield. The conventional sealing step also enhances recombination indirectly. Although the noble metals used to form the electrodes (e.g. , platinum and rhodium) catalyze the recombination reaction only minimally, having a negligible effect on hygrometer sensitivity, the noble metal oxides are active catalysts. Once formed, the oxides of the noble metals retain their oxygen with tenacity. Oxidation of the electrode wires occurs during the sealing step and, therefore, the sealing step indirectly promotes recombination. Despite its drawbacks, the conventional process for manufacturing detecting unit 12 of electrolytic hygrometer 10, as outlined above, results in a useful hygrometer. The performance characteristics of such an hygrometer can be improved, however, by addressing several drawbacks found in the process for manufacturing detecting unit 12. A prefened embodiment of the improved process 100 for manufacturing detecting unit 12 of electrolytic cell 10 is illustrated in FIG. 4. The first step 110 of improved process 100 is to prepare the rhodium wire. First step 110 involves vacuum melting 112, cold drawing 114, and cleaning 116 the as- received rhodium to form high purity rhodium wire. The second step 120 of improved process 100 is to seal and embed rhodium wires 46, 48 in glass tube 98 of detecting unit 12. Detecting unit 12 having rhodium wires 46, 48 is then cleaned, in third step 130 of improved process 100, with hot HC1. Finally, in fourth step 140 of improved process 100, detecting unit 12 is placed in electrolytic cell 10. Fourth step 140 involves installing 142 detecting unit 12 in housing 18 of electrolytic cell 10 and depositing 144 the hygroscopic film (typically phosphorous pentoxide, P2O5) on the inner diameter of glass tube 98 of detecting unit 12 and over rhodium electrode wires 46, 48. A. Preparation of Rhodium Wire 1. Vacuum Melting The process of melting rhodium requires careful control of atmospheric conditions because liquid rhodium will dissolve a large quantity of gases such as oxygen. These gases are rejected during solidification. In addition, heating rhodium in air at temperatures above about 600°C will produce an undesirable thin oxide film. Process 100 of the present invention prevents the inclusion of gases in, and the formation of an oxide film on, the rhodium metal during formation. Nacuum melting step 112 of process 100 yields a very pure, high quality rhodium. For cost reasons, a minimum purity rhodium metal is selected. The as- received rhodium is vacuum melted so that the liquid rhodium does not have dissolved gases in it. Such gases would be out-gassed during the sealing procedure discussed above, producing an inferior glass-to-metal seal. The rhodium is placed in a crucible which, in turn, is placed in a vacuum-melting furnace. The furnace is closed and the chamber is evacuated to a "hard" vacuum of between 1 x 10 "4 and 1 x 10 "5 μ. The rhodium is then heated to between 2160 and 2260°C (200-300°C over its melting point of about 1960°C), stirred, and held at this temperature for up to 5 minutes to assure total melting. The molten rhodium is poured into a graphite or copper mold at a temperature of about 2035°C (about 75°C over its melting point). The rhodium ingot is allowed to freeze and cool before it is removed from the furnace. Nacuum melting procedure 112 of first step 110 of improved process 100 yields a high purity rhodium metal. 2. Cold Drawing Rhodium work hardens rapidly. Plastic deformation changes the internal structure of a metal and, therefore, the properties of that metal. Plastically deformed metals have a distorted structure which reduces the mean free path of electron movements and, therefore, increases the resistivity of the metal. An increase in hardness and strength also results. The increase in hardness that results from plastic deformation is called strain hardening. An increase in both tensile strength and yield strength accompanies this increase in hardness. An index of the amount of plastic deformation is the percent of cold work which the material has undergone. Cold work is the amount of plastic strain introduced in a material during processing, expressed by the percent decrease in cross-sectional area from deformation: %CW = [(Ao - A f ) ÷ Ao] x 100, where AQ and A f are the original and final areas, respectively. Typically, metal wire is work hardened by "drawing" the wire, while "cold" (i.e., below the metal recrystallization temperature), through a series of progressively smaller dies. This process reduces the diameter (hence, area) of, and plastically deforms, the wire. Consequently, the wire is work hardened. A tensile strength of 200,000 to 220,000 psi can be obtained in cold drawn rhodium wire. The rhodium wire used in detecting unit 12 of electrolytic cell 10 of the present invention is subject to cold drawing process step 114. Following the vacuum melting and cold drawing procedures, 112 and 114, respectively, the rhodium wire meets the following specifications: Material Quality Measurement Purity 99.9% Diameter 0.122 to 0.132 mm Tensile Strength 165,000 to 185,000 psi Elongation 10% nominal 3. Cleaning A solution of Chemtronics ® CFC-free Electro- Wash 2000 precision cleaner and degreaser (available from Chemtronics Inc. of Kennesaw, Georgia) is then used to clean the rhodium wires in cleaning step 116 following vacuum melting 112 and cold drawing 114 procedures. B. Seal and Embed Wires in Detecting Unit Once the rhodium metal has been vacuum melted 112 to form wires, and the wires have been cold drawn 114 and cleaned 116, the rhodium wires can be used to manufacture detecting unit 12 of electrolytic cell 10 as described above. Two, thin, rhodium wires 46, 48, alternating with two, thin copper wires 82, 84, are wound tightly around mandrel 80 as shown in FIG. 2. Wound mandrel 80 is placed in sealing device 90 shown in FIG. 3 and wires 46, 48, 82, 84 are sealed in glass tube 98. Once wires 46, 48, 82, 84 are sealed in glass tube 98, mandrel 80 is placed in a pulling device (not shown). Mandrel 80 is stretched and, therefore, becomes thinner. This allows mandrel 80 to slide out from wires 46, 48, 82, 84 and glass tube 98, leaving glass tube 98 with wires 46, 48, 82, 84 sealed inside it. Copper wires 82, 84 are then dissolved in strong nitric acid (HNO3), completing second step 120 of process 100. C. Clean with Hydrochloric Acid At this point in process 100 of the present invention, the rhodium electrodes of detecting unit 12 of electrolytic cell 10 are in position. Detecting unit 12 is then placed within a test tube having a solution of about 37% hydrochloric acid. The test tube containing detecting unit 12 is placed, in turn, in a boiling water bath for about 20 minutes. Thereafter, detecting unit 12 is rinsed with water, acetone, or both, and dried. This completes third (cleaning) step 130 of improved process 100. Rhodium is resistant to corrosion by nearly all aqueous solutions at room temperature, including concentrated acids such as hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, and aqua regia. Hydrochloric acid is preferred because it is a very strong acid able to perform well the function of third step 130: remove all organic oxides and deposits from the rhodium electrodes. D. Place The Detecting Unit in The Electrolytic Cell Detecting unit 12 is then installed 142 in housing 18 of electrolytic cell 10. Finally, the hygroscopic film (typically phosphorous pentoxide, P2O5) is deposited 144 on the inner diameter of glass tube 98 of detecting unit 12 and over electrode wires 46, 48. This fourth step 140 of placing detecting unit 12 in electrolytic cell 10 is well known in the art. It is known that rhodium electrodes are suitable to measure moisture in inert gases. Rhodium electrodes are also preferred to measure water in a sample gas having hydrogen. Platinum electrodes are preferred, however, to measure water in a sample gas having oxygen. The process of the present invention allows rhodium electrodes to be used to measure water in a sample gas comprising oxygen, hydrogen, or an inert gas; therefore, one electrode material is suitable for all applications. It is no longer necessary to provide different cells depending upon the application (sample gas containing oxygen or hydrogen or an inert gas) of interest. Moreover, electrolytic cell 10 produced in accordance with the present invention reduces the recombination effect— in either hydrogen or oxygen— to a negligible amount. Examples A series of test examples illustrates the excellent results achieved with electrolytic hygrometers manufactured according to process 100 of the present invention. Such hygrometers were tested for recombination. The results show that the effect of recombination in both oxygen and hydrogen gases is suppressed. FIG. 5 shows the output response (as a graph) of a first electrolytic hygrometer, manufactured according to the present invention, to the introduction of an oxygen sample gas stream. The sample gas initially introduced into the electrolytic hygrometer was a relatively dry nitrogen gas. The "background" reading of this particular hygrometer in dry nitrogen gas is 27 ppb by volume water vapor, shown as portion "A" of the graph in FIG. 5. At the time indicated by "B" on the graph of FIG. 5, the hygrometer was recalibrated in preparation for analyzing oxygen rather than nitrogen. The recalibration calculation involves a factor of 1.63; therefore, the hygrometer immediately dropped (portion "C" of the graph) to a value of about 17 ppb (27 ÷ 1.63 O 17) at the time indicated by "D" on the graph. At the time indicated by "D" on the graph of FIG. 5, the gas stream was switched to a substantially pure oxygen gas. The graph of the hygrometer reading increased to a peak of about 19 ppb at time "E, " which is somewhat higher than the steady-state moisture reading. The steady-state moisture level of about 18 ppb is shown as portion "F" of the graph in FIG. 5. The increase of 1 ppb, to 19 ppb at the peak "E" from the steady-state value of 18 ppb, represents the sum of several contributing factors. One factor is that moisture tends to desorb more readily from tubing and other flow components in oxygen (or in hydrogen) than in nitrogen. This residual moisture prompts the higher initial reading. The graph of FIG. 5 illustrates that the switch to oxygen sample gas for a first electrolytic hygrometer, manufactured according to the present invention, caused negligible affect on the reading of the hygrometer which might be attributed to recombination. FIG. 6 shows the output response of a second electrolytic hygrometer, also manufactured according to the present invention, to the introduction of an oxygen sample gas stream. Again, any effect of recombination is suppressed. FIGS. 8 and 9 show the output responses (as graphs) of two electrolytic hygrometers, manufactured according to the present invention, to the introduction of a hydrogen sample gas stream. The sample gas initially introduced into the electrolytic hygrometer was a relatively dry nitrogen gas, shown as portion "A" of the graphs in FIGS. 8 and 9. At the time indicated by "B" on the graphs of FIGS. 8 and 9, the hygrometers were recalibrated in preparation for analyzing hydrogen rather than nitrogen. The recalibration calculation involves a factor of 4; therefore, the hygrometer readings immediately dropped (portion "C" of the graphs) to the time indicated by "D" on the graphs. The gas stream was then switched to a substantially pure hydrogen gas. The graphs of the hygrometer readings experienced a small bump at time "E, " likely caused by residual moisture in tubing and other flow components, before rising to the steady-state moisture level shown as portion "F" of the graphs of FIGS. 8 and 9. Again, any effect of recombination is suppressed. FIG. 7 illustrates the problem caused by the effect of recombination in the presence of hydrogen. A conventional hygrometer was used to measure the moisture concentration in a sample gas of substantially pure hydrogen. As for the other tests, the sample gas initially introduced into the electrolytic hygrometer was a relatively dry nitrogen gas. The "background" amount of moisture was read by the hygrometer and shown as portion "A" of the graph in FIG. 7. At the time indicated by "B" on the graph of FIG. 7, the hygrometer was recalibrated in preparation for analyzing hydrogen rather than nitrogen. The hygrometer immediately dropped along portion "C" of the graph. At time "D," the gas stream was switched to the hydrogen gas sample. The recombination of hydrogen from the sample gas with oxygen caused a large rise in the water reading (toward 100 ppb and increasing). The "run away" hygrometer was quickly turned off and the graph shown in FIG. 7 gradually decayed. Although illustrated and described herein with reference to certain specific embodiments, the present invention is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims and without departing from the spirit of the invention. Specifically, the rhodium electrodes may be formed as thin ribbons rather than the usual helically wound round wire electrodes. Although preferable, the electrodes need not be of pure rhodium; they may be composed of an alloy of rhodium. See, e.g.. U.S. Patent No. 3,954,590 issued to Czuha, Jr. (disclosing an iridium-rhodium alloy, thin ribbon electrode).

Claims: What is Claimed: 1. A process of manufacturing an electrolytic hygrometer, having a detecting unit with rhodium electrodes sealingly embedded in a glass tube and minimizing recombination errors in the measurement of moisture in a sample gas stream with a substantial concentration of at least one of the elements hydrogen and oxygen, said process comprising the steps of: providing rhodium metal; preparing rhodium electrodes from the rhodium metal by: (a) vacuum melting the rhodium metal, (b) cold drawing the rhodium metal into rhodium electrodes, and (c) cleaning the rhodium electrodes; sealingly embedding the rhodium electrodes in the glass tube of the detecting unit; cleaning the detecting unit having the embedded rhodium electrodes with a hot acid solution; and placing the detecting unit in the electrolytic cell. 2. The process as claimed in claim 1 wherein said step of vacuum melting yields a rhodium metal having a purity above 99 % . 3. The process as claimed in claim 1 wherein said step of vacuum melting includes placing the rhodium metal in a crucible, placing the crucible in a chamber of a vacuum-melting furnace, closing the furnace, evacuating the chamber to a vacuum of between 1 x 10 " and 1 x 10 " μ, heating the furnace containing the rhodium metal to between 2160 and 2260°C, stirring and holding the temperature of the rhodium metal for up to 5 minutes to assure total melting, pouring the molten rhodium metal into a mold at a temperature of about 2035°C, allowing the rhodium metal to cool, and removing the rhodium metal from the furnace. 4. The process as claimed in claim 1 wherein said step of cold drawing yields a rhodium wire having a diameter between 0.122 to 0.132 mm and a tensile strength between 165,000 to 185,000 psi. 5. The process as claimed in claim 1 wherein a cleaning and degreasing material is applied during said step of cleaning the rhodium electrodes. 6. The process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the hot acid solution used in said step of cleaning the detecting unit having the embedded rhodium electrodes is a hot hydrochloric acid solution. 7. The process as claimed in claim 6 wherein said step of cleaning the detecting unit having the embedded rhodium electrodes with a hot acid solution includes placing the detecting unit within a test tube having a solution of about 37% hydrochloric acid, placing the test tube in a boiling water bath for about 20 minutes, rinsing the detecting unit with at least one of water and acetone, and drying the detecting unit. 8. The process as claimed in claim 1 wherein said step of placing the detecting unit in the electrolytic cell includes installing the detecting unit in the housing of the electrolytic cell and depositing a hygroscopic film on the inner diameter of the detecting unit and over the rhodium electrodes. 9. The electrolytic cell manufactured according to the process of claim 1. 10. A process of manufacturing an electrolytic hygrometer, having a detecting unit with rhodium wire electrodes sealingly embedded in a glass tube and minimizing recombination enors in the measurement of moisture in a sample gas stream with a substantial concentration of at least one of the elements hydrogen and oxygen, said process comprising the steps of: providing rhodium metal; preparing rhodium wire from the rhodium metal by: (a) vacuum melting the rhodium metal, (b) cold drawing the rhodium metal into rhodium wire having a diameter between 0.122 to 0.132 mm and a tensile strength between 165,000 to 185,000 psi, and (c) cleaning the rhodium wire by applying a cleaning and degreasing material; sealingly embedding the rhodium wire as electrodes in the glass tube of the detecting unit; cleaning the detecting unit having the embedded rhodium electrodes with a hot hydrochloric acid solution; and placing the detecting unit in the electrolytic cell. 11. The process as claimed in claim 10 wherein said step of vacuum melting yields a rhodium metal having a purity above 99 % . 12. The process as claimed in claim 10 wherein said step of vacuum melting includes placing the rhodium metal in a crucible, placing the crucible in a chamber of a vacuum-melting furnace, closing the furnace, evacuating the chamber to a vacuum of between 1 x 10 " and 1 x 10 " μ, heating the furnace containing the rhodium metal to between 2160 and 2260° C, stirring and holding the temperature of the rhodium metal for up to 5 minutes to assure total melting, pouring the molten rhodium metal into a mold at a temperature of about 2035°C, allowing the rhodium metal to cool, and removing the rhodium metal from the furnace. 13. The process as claimed in claim 10 wherein said step of cleaning the detecting unit having the embedded rhodium electrodes with a hot hydrochloric acid solution includes placing the detecting unit within a test tube having a solution of about 37% hydrochloric acid, placing the test tube in a boiling water bath for about 20 minutes, rinsing the detecting unit with at least one of water and acetone, and drying the detecting unit. 14. The process as claimed in claim 10 wherein said step of placing the detecting unit in the electrolytic cell includes installing the detecting unit in the housing of the electrolytic cell and depositing a hygroscopic film on the inner diameter of the detecting unit and over the rhodium electrodes. 15. The electrolytic cell manufactured according to the process of claim 10.

Inventors: MACNEEL THOMAS W, MACNEEL, THOMAS, W.
Applicants: MEECO INC, MEECO, INCORPORATED
Application year: 1998
Main classification: G01N27
IPC codes: G01N27