STABILIZED SODIUM CARBONATE PEROXYHYDRATE

Abstract: The invention relates to a stable sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate which is suited to be used together with crystalline synthetic silicate-based detergents and which is coated with an alkali metal sulfate and a copolymer or terpolymer of vinylpyrrolidone.

Description: Stabilized sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate The invention relates to a stabilized sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate suited for use together with crystalline synthetic silicate-based detergent powders. Sodium perborate has for a long time been used as a bleaching agent in laundry detergents. The main commercial product was sodium perborate tetrahydrate (PB4). The drawback of PB4 is its poor solubility in water. When lower temperatures and the use of hydrogen peroxide activators such as TAED were introduced in the washing of laundry, there was a change over in laundry detergents to the more soluble of sodium perborate monohydrate (PB1). Later sodium perborate has been launched also in dishwashing machine detergents instead of chlorine compounds and in stain remover salts. Sodium perborate is a fairly feasible product and relatively stable in phosphate-free detergents, which have become more common especially in countries which do not have an extended and efficient treatment of waste waters. Perhaps the main drawback of sodium perborate is that it contains boron. It has been presumed that boron causes health risks and therefore, for example, maximum limits have been set for the amount of boron in drinking water, and in many places these limitations are being made stricter. Therefore there is a need to have a boron-free bleaching agent which is not dangerous to watercourses or to human beings. Also, the solubility of sodium perborate is not optimal for all products. Sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate (2Na 2 C0 3 *3H 2 0 2 ) would theoretically be a relatively desirable product, since environmentally undesirable degradation products are not generated from this bleaching agent. In addition, its solubility is very good. Sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate is commonly referred to with the erroneous name of "sodium percarbonate", suggesting that the compound in question is a so-called percompound or persalt. As the formula presented above shows, sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate is merely a so-called addition product, in which the hydrogen peroxide is quite loosely bonded, and it contains no group corresponding to the structure of actual percompounds, as do, for example, sodium perborate, sodium monopersulfate, alkali persulfates, etc. A true sodium percarbonate does exist, but it is a dangerous product which cannot be used in household products. Evidently owing partly to its addition structure, sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate is not very stable, and therefore high technical requirements are set for a process for the production of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate. In technochemical household products, for example, in dishwashing machine detergents and in stain removers the properties of which are increasingly beginning to approach those of actual detergents so that they contain, among other ingredients, tensides, enzymes, hydrogen peroxide activators, etc., it is desirable to protect sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate from decomposition. Bleaching agents are used in technochemical household products mostly in laundry detergents. In laundry detergents, silicate-based products such as zeolites, in particular zeolite 4A, are being used increasingly instead of phosphates as the so- called builders. It has not been possible to use sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate in zeolite-containing detergents because the product decomposes very rapidly upon coming into contact with zeolite. The reason for this is not precisely known. It must be taken into account that zeolites normally contain quite considerable amounts of water, for example zeolite 4A usually contains water approx. 20%. In order to give a washing powder an environmentally friendly image, zeolite is being used increasingly as a builder instead of phosphate. At the same time, the aim has been to shift to the use of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate instead of sodium perborate. In this case, problems have been encountered owing to the instability of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate. A large number of stabilization methods have been developed to solve this problem. A considerable number of inventions relate to coatings which contain in the coating layers boric acids or boron salts, such as ortho- and metaborates. The use of additives such as silicates and magnesium sulfate have also been proposed. EP applications 459 625 (Mitsubishi Gas Chem.) and 675 851 (Solvay Interox) propose the use of boric acid and silicates as the coating; EP application 675 852 (Solvay Interox) boric acid and phosphates; EP application 487 256 (Kao Corp.) a borate; EP applications 652 809 and 523 169 (FMC Corp.) borosilicate and phosphonic acid derivatives; and US patent 4 526 698 (Kao Corp.) a borate and an alkali metal silicate or a Mg compound. All of such methods have the disadvantage that, even though the stability is relatively good, boron has not been entirely eliminated. Furthermore, the solubility of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate is often decreased, which is not necessarily good. Combinations of sodium sulfate and sodium chloride have also been used for coating sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate, for example, in EP applications 592 969 and 624 549 (Solvay Interox). In these methods, stability may be based on the fact that sodium sulfate, sodium chloride and sodium carbonate which may form upon the degradation of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate are known to form an addition product together with hydrogen peroxide. There is the disadvantage that chloride, as is known, causes corrosion of stainless steel appliances, such as household appliances. The amounts of coating must also be rather large. Furthermore, chlorinated products may be formed in a reaction between the organic ingredients of detergents, hydrogen peroxide or its degradation products and chloride. The use of inorganic salts in a coating, together with special coating techniques, also seems to be the most common method of attempting to improve the stability of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate. Another group consists of coating methods based on the use of organic substances, either monomeric or polymeric. The applicant's patent application WO-94/05594 describes a method by which a product quite stable as such is obtained. The product is highly suitable for, for example, stain removers in which sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate is used as such or for products in which relatively inert substances such as pure sodium carbonate and possibly only small amounts of ordinaiy detergent components are added to the said chemical. JP application 61 36216 (Sunstar INC. et al.) describes a cleaning agent for dentures, which contains glauber salt 17% and a percompound, e.g. sodium percarbonate. Glauber salt is a hydrous form of sodium sulfate, sodium sulfate decahydrate. Sodium percarbonate is first mixed with glauber salt, thereafter a polymer in an alcohol solution is atomized over the mixture, which polymer may be, for example, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and the alcohol is evaporated. The product thus obtained is then mixed with the other components of the cleaning agent to obtain the final cleansing agent for dentures. JP application 60 30723 (Matsamura Kagaku Kogyo) discloses a product for cleaning urine-stained textiles. Sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate and certain actual peroxy compounds, such as potassium percarbonate and certain persulfates and perborate, are coated by powdering water-soluble non-heavy metal salt powders, such as sulfates, chlorides and phosphates, over the said hydrogen peroxide compounds or percompounds and by using a water-soluble adhesive such as polyvinylpyrrolidone and other water-soluble polymers which contain, among others, maleate and acrylate groups, in order to obtain the final product. It is difficult by means of powdering treatment to render the surface of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate sufficiently protective in order that the product could be used in detergents and in particular detergents which contain zeolite, which very rapidly decomposes sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate. At least the amounts of material used for the powdering treatment must be quite large. Indeed, in the invention an inorganic salt is used in an amount of 20-35% in proportion to the inorganic peroxy salt. The present applicant has developed a method (Fl-patent application 935342) in which a veiy good stability is achieved with a sodium sulfate coating in, for example, a carbon dioxide atmosphere, when the product is tested in a mixture with zeolite. The method has the drawback that usually a rather large amount of sodium sulfate is needed in order to achieve high stability in long-term tests and under severe conditions. To achieve of a high stability requires a sodium sulfate content of approx. 25%. In this case the active oxygen content of the product drops from 13- 14%, which is the practical value for sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate, to below 11%. In certain detergent applications this is too low a value in order for the detergent to be optimally formulated without its containing too much of a component containing a bleaching agent. For this reason it would be desirable to decrease the amount of coating. It is an object of the present invention to provide a storage-stable sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate which, when coming into contact with silicate-based detergents, remains undecomposed for quite a long time. It is also an object of the invention to make possible the production of detergent compositions the ingredients of which are environmentally friendly. These objects are achieved in accordance with the invention with a stable sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate which is coated with an alkali metal sulfate and a copolymer or teφolymer of vinylpyrrolidone. The characteristics of the invention are stated in the accompanying claims 1-16. It was found, surprisingly, that, by using certain copolymers or terpolymers of vinylpyrrolidone together with an alkali metal sulfate for coating sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate, a very stable product was obtained which is suitable for use with silicate-based detergents, such as zeolites and layer silicates. Furthermore, it was found that in order to achieve the same stability as has a product coated with sodium sulfate alone, the use of copolymers or terpolymers makes it possible to decrease the amount of sodium sulfate. Thereby the active oxygen content of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate is retained and optimal formulation in detergent applications is facili- tated, since bleaching agent need not be used in excessive amounts. The coating can be carried out by known procedures, preferably by the fluidization technique, wherein sodium sulfate and the polymer-containing solution according to the invention are atomized into a fluid-bed drier in a selected order. The atomization may also be carried out so that the polymer and the sodium sulfate are mixed together to form a solution. Often in such a case the dissolving must take place immediately before the atomization in order that no precipitation would occur. The coating can also be carried out by kneading the sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate in the said mixture. This is very feasible, if the sodium carbonate used as the initial substance is finely divided, in which case an increase of the particle size is also achieved by granulation. Since sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate is an alkaline product which is catalyzed by all heavy-metal ions, their hydroxides, oxides and oxyhydroxides, it is clear that stabilization can be improved by using known chelators of metals, such as phosphonic acid derivatives, aminopolycarboxylic acids, antioxidants, etc., which are used for stabilizing hydrogen peroxide in alkaline conditions. Polymers according to the invention can be used advantageously both in the intermediate layer and in the surface layer, i.e. the sodium sulfate may be added after the polymer treatment or before it. In this case the use of blends of polymers and sodium sulfate is also possible. The polymers usable for coating in accordance with the invention include the copolymers and terpolymers of vinylpyrrolidone. The copolymer or teφolymer is formed by polymerizing together N-vinylpyrrolidone and a monomer which contains at least one vinyl group. The monomer which contains a vinyl group may be an α-olefin which contains 2-20 carbon atoms, an aromatic monomer, an ester monomer, an ester monomer derivative, a (meth)acrylic acid derivative or a heterocyclic monomer. The α-olefin may be, for example, ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 1- heptene, 1-octene, 1-decene, 1-hexadecene or 1-eicocene. The aromatic monomer may be a styrene or a methyl styrene. The ester monomer may be, for example, selected from the group consisting of vinyl acetate, (meth)acrylic acid N-alkyl- aininoalkyl ester, or a quaternary salt of these. The (meth)acrylic acid derivative may be, for example, a (meth)acrylic acid amide derivative. The heterocyclic monomer may be, for example, vinyl caprolactam. The teφolymer may be formed, for example, by polymerizing together N-vinylpyrrolidone, vinyl caprolactam and dimethylaminoethyl (meth)acrylate monomer. Preferred polymers include N- vinylpyrrolidone 1 -butyl copolymer or N-vinylpyrrolidone 1-hexadecane copolymer. Copolymers which have been formed by polymerizing N-vinylpyrrolidone with styrene, methyl styrene, vinyl acetate, di-( 1-3 carbon atom)alkylamino- (2-6 carbon atom)alkyl (meth)acrylate, vinyl caprolactam or (meth)acrylic acid amide derivative, such as (3-(methacryloylamino)propyl)trimethyl ammonium chloride. It is also possible to use homopolymers of vinylpyrrolidone, such as polyvinyl- pyιτolidone (PVP), as an additive in the coating of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate. However, such additives do not provide any significant advantages over sodium sulfate alone when coated sodium carbonate peroxyhydrates are tested in a blend with silicate-based detergents. The products are, however, well suited for blends in which a silicate-based detergent is not used as a blend component, such as stain remover salts. The sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to the invention, containing sodium sulfate and a polymer, is suitable for use with silicate-based detergent powders, such as zeolites and layer silicates. The use of coatings is not limited only to products containing zeolite 4A. It is known that, for example, zeolite 24A contains less water than does zeolite 4A, and sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate decomposes more slowly in contact with zeolite 24A than with zeolite 4A. In products which contain zeolite 24A (Crosfield Group) it is also possible to use coatings according to the invention to improve further the stability of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate. The coatings according to the invention are also suitable for products which contain so-called sheet silicates, which are produced by, for example, Hoechst AG. It has been assumed that the decomposition of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate is due to the effect of water. This water may be derived from outside or from the decomposition of the product. The hypothesis has been that such water must be bonded if it is formed between the percarbonate and the coating, or it is necessary to prevent its access to dissolve the product, whereupon hydrogen peroxide is released and passes into the alkaline solution, in which hydrogen peroxide is known to decompose rapidly and especially in the presence of heavy metal ions, their hydroxides, oxides or oxyhydroxides. As regards zeolites, a hypothesis is that zeol- ite 4A normally contains adsorbed water approx. 20%. This water may "dissolve" sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate, whereupon the hydrogen peroxide passes into an alkaline solution, in which hydrogen peroxide is known to be unstable, especially in the presence of heavy metal ions and their hydroxides, oxides or oxyhydroxides. Another hypothesis is that hydrogen peroxide is very apt to change places with the water present in zeolite. Thereupon, hydrogen peroxide would decompose quite easily. In the product according to the invention it is suφrising that the most hygroscopic polymers usually worked best and, in turn, those products the water adsoφtion capacity of which is lowest, but by no means zero, yielded poorer results. Thus, for example, the water present in zeolite may not as such be the crucial factor in the decomposition process; the decomposition must to a considerable degree be due to other factors. It is known that an adduct of hydrogen peroxide can be prepared from polyvinylpyrrolidone at an elevated temperature. One hypothesis could be that the products in question would form an adduct preventing the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide as hydrogen peroxide is released under the effect of water. It may also be that a perhydroxyl anion which forms especially rapidly from hydrogen peroxide in alkaline conditions becomes in some manner bonded to the nitrogen group, or that a hydroxy radical which is formed from the perhydroxyl anion and may promote a chain reaction reacts with the polymer in question and which at the same time becomes inactive. This would be supported by the fact that polyvinylpyrrolidone contains tertiary nitrogen, which may in part stabilize the alkaline decomposition process of hydrogen peroxide. Thus a good additive must be sufficiently hygroscopic, but it must not moisten the product and it must react with hydrogen peroxide or further reaction products thereof. Examples In all of the coating tests of examples 1-5, the material which was coated was a sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate (SPH) having an active oxygen content of 14.3% as measured by conventional potassium permanganate titration. For the measuring of SPH stability there is commonly used a method in which the product is packed into a tightly closed cardboard box, and thus the method should illustrate the behavior of the product in an unopened consumer package. Such a package is then placed in a climate chamber the temperature and relative humidity of which are set at certain values, for example, 30°C and a relative humidity of 70%. If the product is somehow stable, obtaining sufficient information about the stability of the product would require long periods. Furthermore, the method does not provide information of how the product behaves when the package has been opened and it comes into contact with air. Another method used is to place the product in a vessel which is closed with slightly permeable plastic film or a perforated film. This does not always provide reliable results, either, since the oxygen formed upon the decomposition of SPH is capable, at least in part, of preventing the ambient air from coming into contact with the product. The same difficulties are encountered when the product is tested in plastic bags which are not completely airtight. The applicant has used a method which has worked well in the applicant's tests and which yields reliable results regarding the behavior of the product already after a test period of one week. Two-week tests already yield very reliable results. The test conditions are, however, quite severe, since the products are tested in an open vessel at a temperature of 30°C and a relative humidity of 70%. It has been observed previously that, for example zeolites veiy rapidly decompose sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate. In the present invention, a method was used in which SPH is mixed at a ratio of 1 : 1 with a commercial zeolite 4A fine powder having a particle size of approx. 10 microns. Such a blend is tested under the same conditions as were described above. The method is overall as follows: If the question is of pure SPH, precisely approx. 4-5 g of SPH is weighed into an open, flat-bottomed glass vessel having edges and a capacity of 15 ml. This vessel is placed in a climate chamber with the conditions stated above. After a predetermined period the vessel is taken out of the climate chamber. The contents and the hydrogen peroxide concentration are determined by a known potassium permanganate method. If the effect of zeolite is being examined, NPH is mixed well with an equal amount by weight of a commercial zeolite 4A, in total 4-5 grams. Example 1 Table 1 shows the stability of SPH alone and mixed with zeolite. Table 1 Decrease of the active oxygen content of SPH alone and in a blend with zeolite, measured in percentages Product / time / decomposition % 1 week 2 weeks 3 weeks 4 weeks SPH 5.7 7.0 8.7 10.4 SPH + zeolite 44.0 65.5 80.0 87.0 It can be observed from the results that the stability of SPH is still quite good after two weeks, but in a mixture with zeolite its stability is very poor. Example 2 Table 2 shows the decomposition results, at different sodium sulfate concentrations, of SPH samples coated by the method described in the applicant's FI application 935342. Table 2 Decomposition of SPH samples coated with different sodium sulfate (SOS) concentrations in a mixture with zeolite 4A in 2-week tests Product / SOS content / decomposition % 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% SPH + zeolite 14.3 16.0 17.8 20.8 25.0 SPHs coated in accordance with the invention are described in the following examples: Example 3 The coating tests were carried out by using an Aeromatic Strea 1 equipment. The polymers were dissolved in water to form saturated solutions of at maximum 10 per cent concentration. An approx. 29 per cent aqueous solution of sodium sulfate was used as the sodium sulfate solution. The solutions were atomized in a selective order by means of a 2-phase atomizer by using air as the atomization gas. The coating amounts and thereby the coating thickness could be varied by changing the solution amounts fed in. If the sodium sulfate solution also contained a polymer solution, this solution had to be atomized immediately in order to avoid precipitation, otherwise an uneven coating was formed. When the objective was to produce a polymer-containing coating with a sodium sulfate concentration of 20 per cent, the following amounts of materials were used: - 300 g SPH 6 or 12 g polymer (concentration 1.6-3.1%) (recipes 1 and 2) 75 g sodium sulfate (SOS content 19.7-19.4% = approx. 20%) When the polymer was fed in last, the polymer charge used was 15 g (3.8%). recipe 3. By feeding in smaller amounts of solution, it was possible to reduce the amounts of sodium sulfate and polymer in the final coated product. In the following test, the following homopolymers of vinylpyrrolidone were used: K-30 of International Specialty Products (ISP), molecular weight 38,000 K-90 of ISP, molecular weight 630,000 PNP of Aldrich Chemicals, catalogue number 85, 654-2, molecular weight 10,000, denoted in the table by PVP A. Table 3 Comparative tests with SPH samples coated with approx. 20 per cent SOS and a polymer, decomposition percentage after 2 weeks in a blend with zeolite 4A 'olymer used Reci Decomposition K-30 1 15.3% K-30 2 20.8% K-30 3 13.3% K-90 1 15.4% K-90 2 18.8% K K--9900 3 3 22.7% PNP A 1 15.0% PNP A 2 19.6% PNP A 3 15.1% Example 4 In the following tests, the following vinylpyrrolidone polymers were used: Antara ® 430 = vinylpyrrolidone - styrene copolymer (ISP product) Antaron ® P 904 = butylated polyvinylpyrrolidone (ISP product) ACP = vinyl pyrrolidone acrylic acid (NP/AC) copolymer (ISP product) ACP 1005 NP/AC 25:75, molecular weight high ACP 1033 NP/AC 75:25, molecular weight average ACP 1042 NP/AC 25:75, molecular weight average The ACP products were the least hygroscopic of the polymers used in the test. Table 4 Results obtained with different products and recipes, the amount of SOS being approx. 20% Polymer Recipe Decomposition alone with zeolite 2 weeks 2 weeks Antara* 430 1 4.8% 8.5% Antaxon ® P 904 1 4.0% 10.0% 3 7.3% 9.8% ACP 1005 1 8.3% 22.8% ACP 1033 1 7.0% 39.8% ACP 1042 1 7.7% 17.5% Example 5 In the following series, the effect of the amounts of coating was examined, the amount of polymer being 1.6-2.0% (6 g) of the total end product amount. Table 5 Effects of different amounts of coating Polymer SOS Decomposition with zeolite 2 weeks PVP A 0% 51.0% 5% 34.4% 10% 25.0% 20% 16.7% Antara® 430 0% 42.2% 5% 41.4% 10% 12.5% 20% 7.9% Antaron® P 904 0% 45.8% 5% 33.6% 10% 11.0% 20% 6.0% Example 6 In the following, the stability of a SPH of poor grade was tested, the SPH being coated with a copolymer or teφolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone together with sodium sulfate. The product was contacted with zeolite (4A) at 30°C and a relative humidity of 70%. The relative decomposition percentages shown in the table were obtained through a comparison with SPH coated with only sodium sulfate under corresponding conditions. Table 6 SPH stability tests SPH was coated with 10 per cent sodium sulfate and polymer, decomposition in a blend with zeolite (50:50) during 2 weeks at 30°C and a relative humidity of 70% Products of International Specialty Products used in the table: Antaron ® P-904 = Butylated PNP Antaron ® V-216 = PVP/hexadecene copolymer Antara ® 430 = vinylpyrrolidone/styrene copolymer PVP/VA 735 W = poly(vinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate copolymer) Copolymer 845 = poly(vinylpynolidone/dimethylaminoethyl methacιylate) Copolymer 937 = poly(vmylpy-rrolidone/dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) Copolymer 958 = poly(vinylpyrrolidone/dimethylaminoethyl methaciylate) H 2 OLD ® EP-l = teφolymer of vinyl caprolactam, vinylpyrrolidone and dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate Gafquat ® HS-100 = copolymer of vinylpyrrolidone and methacrylamido- propyltrimethyl ammonium chloride Gafquat w 734 and 755N = quaternary copolymer of vinylpyrrolidone and dimethylaminoethyl methaciylate Other legend: PVP = copolymer or teφolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone PNP-SOS = coated first with PNP and then with sodium sulfate SOS-PNP = coated first with sodium sulfate and then with PNP PNP(X %) = an X per cent polymer solution used Coating % = proportion of polymer of the SPH amount Decomposition % = decomposition as a percentage of the decomposition of SPH coated with only sodium sulfate It can be seen that with the use of copolymers or teφolymers of vinyl pyrrolidone in an amount of 0.5-1.5% (acronym PNP is used for the polymers in the table even though the actual vinylpyrrolidone homopolymer, PVP, was not used) the decomposition of SPH is reduced to 40-60% of what is achieved with only sodium sulfate coating.

Claims: Claims 1. A stable sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate, suitable for use together with a crystalline synthetic silicate-based detergent, characterized in that a sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate granule is coated with an alkali metal sulfate and a co- polymer or teφolymer of vinylpyrrolidone. 2. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 1, characterized in that the alkali metal sulfate is sodium sulfate or potassium sulfate. 3. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 1, characterized in that the copolymer or teφolymer is formed by polymerizing together N- vinylpyrrolidone and a monomer which contains at least one vinyl group. 4. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 1 or 3, characterized in that the copolymer is formed by polymerizing together N-vinylpyrrolidone and an α-olefin monomer which contains 2-20 carbon atoms. 5. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 4, characterized in that the α-olefin which contains 2-20 carbon atoms is selected from the group consisting of ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 1-heptene, 1- octene, 1-decene, 1-hexadecene and 1-eicocene. 6. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 1 or 5, characterized in that the copolymer is a N-vinylpyrrolidone 1 -butyl copolymer or a N-vinylpyrro- lidone 1-hexadecane copolymer. 7. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 1 or 3, characterized in that the copolymer is formed by polymerizing together N-vinylpyrrolidone and an aromatic monomer containing a vinyl group, such as styrene and methyl styrene. 8. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 1, characterized in that the copolymer is formed by polymerizing together N-vinylpyrrolidone and an ester monomer containing a vinyl group, such as vinyl acetate. 9. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 1, characterized in that the copolymer is formed by polymerizing together N-vinylpyrrolidone and an ester monomer containing a vinyl group, such as N-alkylaminoalkyl esters of acrylic or methacrylic acid or quaternary salts thereof. 10. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 1 or 9, characterized in that the alkylaminoalkyl ester of (meth)acrylic acid is selected from the group consisting of di-(l-3 carbon atom)alkylamino-(2-6 carbon atom)alkyl (methacrylate. 11. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 10, characterized in that the alkylaminoalkyl ester of (meth)acrylic acid is dimethylaminoethyl (meth)- acrylate or diethylaminoethyl (meth)acrylate. 12. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 1, characterized in that the copolymer is formed by polymerizing together N-vinyl pyrrolidone and a (meth)acrylic acid amide derivative, such as (3-(methacιyloylamino)-propyl)-tri- methyl ammonium chloride. 13. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 1, characterized in that the copolymer is formed by polymerizing together N-vinylpyrrolidone and a heterocyclic monomer containing a vinyl group, such as vinyl caprolactam. 14. A sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to Claim 1, characterized in that the teφolymer is formed by polymerizing together N-vinylpyrrolidone, vinyl caprolactam and dimethylaminoethyl (meth)acrylate monomer. 15. Use of a coated sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate according to any of the above claims in crystalline, synthetic silicate-based detergents. 16. Use according to Claim 15, characterized in that the silicate component in the detergent is zeolite or a layer silicate.

Inventors: KORVELA TIMO, RENVALL ILKKA, KORVELA, TIMO, RENVALL, ILKKA
Applicants: KEMIRA CHEMICALS OY, KORVELA TIMO, RENVALL ILKKA, KORVELA, TIMO, RENVALL, ILKKA
Application year: 1998
Main classification: C11D3
IPC codes: C01B15, C11D3, C11D17