A method for de novo peptide sequence determination

Abstract: A method for determining the amino acid sequence of an unknown peptide comprising (a) determining a molecular mass and an experimental fragmentation spectrum for the unknown peptide; (b) comparing the experimental fragmentation spectrum of the unknown peptide to theoretical fragmentation spectra calculated for a peptide library composed of all possible linear sequences of amino acids having a total mass that corresponds to the molecular mass of the unknown peptide; and (c) identifying a peptide in the peptide library having a theoretical fragmentation spectrum that matches most closely the fragmentation spectrum of the unknown peptide.

Description: FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to a method for the determination of the precise linear sequence of amino acids in a peptide, polypeptide or protein, without recourse or reference to either a known pre-defined data base or to sequential amino acid residue analysis. As such, the method of the invention is a true, de novo peptide sequence determination method. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The composition of a peptide (which term includes also polypeptide or protein) as a sequence of amino acids is well understood. Each peptide is uniquely defined by a precise linear sequence of amino acids. Knowledge of the precise linear arrangement or sequence of amino acids in a peptide is required for various purposes, including DNA cloning in which the sequence of amino acids provides information required for oligonucleotide probes and polymerase chain reaction ("PCR") primers. Knowledge of the exact sequence also allows the synthesis of peptides for antibody production, provides identification of peptides, aids in the characterization of recombinant products, and is useful in the study of post-translational modifications. A variety of sequencing methods are available to obtain the amino acid sequence information. For example, a series of chemical reactions, e.g., Edman reactions, or enzymatic reactions, e.g., exo-peptidase reactions, are used to prepare sequential fragments of the unknown peptide. Either an analysis of the sequential fragments or a sequential analysis of the removed amino acids is used to determine the linear amino acid sequence of the unknown peptide. Typically, the Edman degradation chemistry is used in modern automated protein sequencers. In the Edman degradation, a peptide is sequenced by degradation from the N-terminus using the Edman reagent, phenylisothiocyanate (PITC). The degradation process involves three steps, i.e., coupling, cleavage, and conversion. In the coupling step, PITC modifies the N-terminal residue of the peptide, polypeptide, or protein. An acid cleavage then cleaves the N-terminal amino acid in the form of an unstable anilinothiazolinone (ATZ) derivative, and leaves the peptide with a reactive N-terminus and shortened by one amino acid. The ATZ derivative is converted to a stable phenylthiohydantoin in the conversion step for identification, typically with reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). The shortened peptide is left with a free N-terminus that can undergo another cycle of the degradation reaction. Repetition of the cycle results in the sequential identification of each amino acid in the peptide. Because of the sequential nature of amino acid release, only one molecular substance can be sequenced at a time. Therefore, peptide samples must be extremely pure for accurate and efficient sequencing. Typically, samples must be purified with HPLC or SDS-PAGE techniques. Although many peptide sequences have been determined by Edman degradation, currently, most peptide sequences are deduced from DNA sequences determined from the corresponding gene or cDNA. However, the determination of a protein sequence using a DNA sequencing technique requires knowledge of the specific nucleotide sequence used to synthesize the protein. DNA sequencing cannot be used where the nature of the protein or the specific DNA sequence used to synthesize the protein is unknown. A peptide sequence may also be determined from experimental fragmentation spectra of the unknown peptide, typically obtained using activation or collision-induced fragmentation in a mass spectrometer. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) techniques have been particularly useful. In MS/MS, a peptide is first purified, and then injected into a first mass spectrometer. This first mass spectrometer serves as a selection device, and selects a target peptide of a particular molecular mass from a mixture of peptides, and eliminates most contaminants from the analysis. The target molecule is then activated or fragmented to form a mixture from the target or parent peptide of various peptides of a lower mass that are fragments of the parent. The mixture is then selected through a second mass spectrometer (i.e. step), generating a fragment spectrum. Typically, in the past, the analysis of fragmentation spectra to determine peptide sequences has involved hypothesizing one or more amino acid sequences based on the fragmentation spectrum. In certain favorable cases, an expert researcher can interpret the fragmentation spectra to determine the linear amino acid sequence of an unknown peptide. The candidate sequences may then be compared with known amino acid sequences in protein sequence libraries. In one strategy, the mass of each amino acid is subtracted from the molecular mass of the parent peptide to determine the possible molecular mass of a fragment, assuming that each amino acid is in a terminal position. The experimental fragment spectrum is then examined to determine if a fragment with such a mass is present. A score is generated for each amino acid, and the scores are sorted to generate a list of partial sequences for the next subtraction cycle. The subtraction cycle is repeated until subtraction of the mass of an amino acid leaves a difference of between -0.5 and 0.5, resulting in one or more candidate amino acid sequences. The highest scoring candidate sequences are then compared to sequences in a library of known protein sequences in an attempt to identify a protein having a sub-sequence similar or identical to the candidate sequence that generated the fragment spectrum. Although useful in certain contexts, there are difficulties related to hypothesizing candidate amino acid sequences based on fragmentation spectra. The interpretation of fragmentation spectra is time-consuming, can generally be performed only in a few laboratories that have extensive experience with mass spectrometry, and is highly technical and often inaccurate. Human interpretation is relatively slow, and may be highly subjective (for an example, see Medzihradszky et al ., 1996 JASMS 7: 1-10). Moreover, methods based on peptide mass mapping are limited to peptide masses derived from an intact homogeneous peptide generated by specific, known proteolytic cleavage, and, thus, are not applicable in general to a mixture of peptides. U.S. Patent No. 5,538,897 to Yates, III et al. provides a method of correlating the fragmentation spectrum of an unknown peptide with theoretical spectra calculated from described peptide sequences stored in a database to match the amino acid sequence of the unknown peptide to that of a described peptide. Known amino acid sequences, e.g., in a protein sequence library, are used to calculate or predict one or more candidate fragment spectra. The predicted fragment spectra are then compared with the experimentally-obtained fragment spectrum of the unknown protein to determine the best match or matches. Preferably, the mass of the unknown peptide is known. Sub-sequences of the various sequences in the protein sequence library are analyzed to identify those sub-sequences corresponding to a peptide having a mass equal to or within a given tolerance of the mass of the parent peptide in the fragmentation spectrum. For each sub-sequence having the proper mass, a predicted fragment spectrum can be calculated by calculating masses of various amino acid subsets of the candidate peptide. As a result, a plurality of candidate peptides, each having a predicted fragment spectrum, is obtained. The predicted fragment spectra are then compared with the fragment spectrum obtained experimentally for the unknown protein, to identify one or more proteins having sub-sequences that are likely to be identical to the sequence of peptides that resulted in the experimentally-derived fragment spectrum. However, this technique cannot be used to derive the sequence of unknown, novel proteins or peptides having no sequence or sub-sequence identity with those pre-described or contained in such databases, and, thus, is not a de novo sequencing method. U.S. Patent No. 5,470,753 to Sepetov et al ., provides a method for determining the amino acid sequence of an unknown peptide that has been derivatised by exchanging exchangeable hydrogen ions with deuterium, in which the candidate peptides must be constrained by both the molecular mass of the unknown peptide and at least one additional constraint such as the number of reactive moieties in the unknown peptide. Indeed, the method teaches that the number of possible amino acid combinations in a synthetic library must be reduced by forming derivatives of the peptide and eliminating sequences that do not form the observed derivatives. The method also discloses determining the amino acid sequence of a peptide of fixed length in a synthetic library in which the number of amino acids in the peptide is known; a further constraint. Furthermore, during synthesis, peptides of the synthetic library are truncated and their molecular weights determined, adding a further constraint on the method of determining the amino acid sequence of the unknown peptide. Thus all possible combinations of amino acids compatible with the molecular weight are not used to generate the library. Therefore, there remains a need for a true de novo sequencing method of determining the amino acid sequence of a peptide using mass spectrometry. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention applies a method for generating a library of peptides, wherein each peptide in the library has a molecular mass corresponding to the same predetermined molecular mass. The library of peptides is then used to determine the amino acid sequence of an unknown peptide having the predetermined molecular mass. The predetermined molecular mass used to generate the library is the molecular mass of the unknown peptide. The molecular mass of the unknown peptide is determined prior to the generation of the library using a mass spectrometer, such as a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The library is synthetic, i.e., not pre-described, and is typically generated each time a peptide is analyzed, based on the predetermined molecular mass of the unknown peptide. The library is generated by defining a set of all allowed combinations of amino acids that can be present in the unknown peptide, where the molecular mass of each combination corresponds to the predetermined molecular mass within the experimental accuracy of the device used to determine the molecular mass, allowing for water lost in peptide bond formation and for protonation, and generating an allowed library of all possible permutations of the linear sequence of amino acids in each combination in the set. The present invention is a method for determining the amino acid sequence of an unknown peptide, which comprises determining a molecular mass and an experimental mass fragmentation spectrum for the unknown peptide, calculating theoretical mass fragmentation spectra for a theoretical peptide library composed of all possible linear sequences of amino acids having a total mass that corresponds to the molecular mass of the unknown peptide, and assigning an intensity to each of these sequences, comparing the experimental mass fragmentation spectrum of the unknown peptide to the theoretical spectra and identifying a peptide in the theoretical peptide library having a theoretical mass fragmentation spectrum that matches most closely the mass fragmentation spectrum of the unknown peptide, from which it is inferred that the amino acid sequence of the identified peptide in the allowed library represents the amino acid sequence of the unknown peptide. The molecular mass for the unknown peptide may be determined by any means known in the art, but is preferably determined with a mass spectrometer. Allowed combinations of amino acids are chosen from a set of allowed amino acids that typically comprises the natural amino acids, i.e., tryptophan, arginine, histidine, glutamic acid, glutamine, aspartic acid, leucine, threonine, proline, alanine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, methionine, lysine, asparagine, isoleucine, cysteine, valine, serine, and glycine, but may also include other amino acids, including, but not limited to, non-natural amino acids and chemically modified derivatives of the natural amino acids, e.g., carbamidocysteine and deoxymethionine. Allowed combinations of amino acids are then calculated using one or more individual members of this set of amino acids, allowing for known mass changes associated with peptide bond formation, such that the total mass of each allowed combination corresponds to the predetermined mass of the unknown peptide to within the experimental accuracy to which this molecular mass of the unknown peptide was calculated, typically about 30 ppm. The set of allowed combinations is most easily calculated using an appropriately programmed computer. The allowed peptide library is assembled by permutation in all possible linear combinations of each allowed amino acid composition, and is also most easily constructed using an appropriately programmed computer. It should be noted that the term "allowed" with respect to amino acid combinations and libraries of peptides refers to combinations and libraries specific to the unknown peptide under investigation. The peptide library is constructed from the amino acid combinations, which in turn are calculated from the experimentally determined molecular mass. As unknown peptides of different mass are investigated, so different combinations of amino acids are allowed, and hence each unknown peptide of unique molecular mass gives rise to a unique peptide library. The present invention constrains the allowed library, i.e. limits the number of possible sequences. In the broadest aspect of the invention, this constraint is achieved by determining a molecular mass for the peptide whose sequences is to be determined, i.e. the unknown peptide. According to preferred embodiments of the invention, information, e.g. available from the experimental fragmentation spectrum of the unknown peptide, can be used to put further constraints on the number of possible sequences of amino acids in the peptide library. For example, the immonium ion region of the mass spectrum used to determine the molecular mass may also be used to identify amino acids contained in the unknown peptide. Alternatively or in addition, the two N-terminal amino acids may be identified from the b 2 /a 2 ion pairs. For example, the two N-terminal amino acids may be deduced from the prominent signals of the b 2 and a 2 ions. In particular, the identity of the signals may be determined by recognition of signals separated by 27.98 a.m.u. (corresponding to CO) in the region ofthe spectrum which includes the mass of all possible combinations of modified and unmodified amino acids. Further, based on the use of enzyme treatment, e.g. with a protease such as papain, chymotrypsin or trypsin, the C-terminal residue of any peptide in the spectrum is determined as either arginine or lysine, and this may be confirmed or identified from the recognition of signals at 175.11 and 147.11 respectively. Alternatively, C-terminals containing basic amino acids can be identified by recognition ofthe predicted y 1 ion. The spectrum can be interpreted to identify the next amino acids. Another means of applying a constraint on the allowed library of amino acids is to obtain partial internal sequence information, e.g. by identifying the y series of ions with appropriate defined accuracy of mass measurement. In particular, a computer programme may be used to recognise at least three sequential signals separated by the mass of all possible modified and unmodified amino acid residues. The differences between these signals allows identification of a sequence of two amino acids. Most preferably, the molecular mass of the unknown peptide and at least one other experimental parameter, e.g. as given above, are used as constraints in initially generating the library of allowed peptides. The nature ofthe fragmentation process from which the theoretical fragmentation spectrum is calculated for every peptide in the allowed library may be of any type known in the art, such as a mass spectrum or a protease or chemical fragmentation spectrum. Preferably, both the molecular mass and the fragmentation spectrum for the unknown peptide are obtained from a tandem mass spectrometer. The amino acid sequence of the peptide from the allowed library of peptides, having a calculated fragmentation spectrum that best fits the experimental fragmentation spectrum of the unknown peptide, corresponds to the amino acid sequence of the unknown peptide. Although not required, the experimental fragmentation spectrum is generally normalized. A factor that is an indication of closeness-of-fit between the experimental fragmentation spectrum of the unknown peptide and each of the theoretical fragmentation spectra calculated for the peptide library may then be calculated to determine which of the theoretical fragmentation spectra best fits the experimental fragmentation spectrum. Preferably, peak values in the fragmentation spectra having an intensity greater than a predetermined threshold value are selected when calculating the indication of closeness-of-fit. The theoretical fragmentation spectrum that best fits the experimental fragmentation spectrum corresponds to the amino acid sequence in the allowed library that matches that of the unknown peptide. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 is a flow chart of the method of the invention. Figs. 2a and 2b are flow charts of alternative preferred embodiments of the invention. Fig. 3 is the experimental mass spectrum used to determine the molecular mass of unknown Peptide X. Fig. 4 is the immonium ion region of the mass spectrum shown in Fig. 3, and identifies amino acids contained in unknown Peptide X. Fig. 5 is the experimental fragmentation mass spectrum of Peptide X. Fig. 6 is the experimental mass spectrum used to determine the molecular mass of a Peptide Y. Fig. 7 is the immonium ion region of the mass spectrum shown in Fig. 6, and identifies amino acids contained in Peptide Y. Fig. 8 is the experimental tandem mass spectrum of Peptide Y. Fig. 9 is the experimental mass spectrum used to determine the molecular mass of a Peptide Z. Fig. 10 is the immonium ion region of the mass spectrum shown in Fig. 9, and identifies amino acids contained in Peptide Z. Fig. 11 is the experimental tandem mass spectrum of Peptide Z. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention is directed to a de novo method for determining the sequence of an unknown peptide without reference to any experimentally determined peptide or nucleotide sequence, and without recourse to a sequential and step-wise identification and ordering of individual amino acid residues, such as the Edman degradation process or interpretation of conventional mass spectrometry fragmentation patterns. In the method of the invention, a library of theoretical peptide sequences is generated from a predetermined molecular mass, namely the experimentally determined molecular mass of an unknown peptide. As such, this library must contain the amino acid sequence of the unknown peptide, as well as that of any other peptide having the predetermined molecular mass. The precise amino acid sequence of the unknown is identified by applying standard correlation functions to select that peptide from the synthetic library whose calculated, i.e., theoretical, fragmentation spectrum most closely matches the fragmentation pattern of the unknown. In the preferred embodiment, the fragmentation spectrum is a mass spectrum and the correlation method is the function described in U.S. Patent No. 5,538,897. Preferably, the theoretical fragmentation spectra are generated and matched to the fragmentation pattern of the unknown using an appropriately programmed computer. The invention may be better understood by reference to the flow chart provided in Fig. 1. Where the peptide is a protein or large polypeptide, the protein or large polypeptide may be cleaved to form a peptide pool by means well known in the art. The unknown peptide ("Peptide X") is then separated from the pool by HPLC or any other means known in the art, preferably mass spectrometry, and the molecular mass of Peptide X is determined. Although there are a number of methods for determining the molecular mass of Peptide X, the preferred method is again mass spectrometry. A set of amino acids that theory or experimental results teach may be included in Peptide X is then defined for consideration in determining the sequence of Peptide X. The defined set of amino acids may include modified or unnatural amino acids in addition to natural amino acids. Typically, the method of the invention requires a "naked" peptide when determining the amino acid sequence. Therefore, the peptide should be free of any individual amino acids that are covalently modified by post-translational modification, such as, e.g., glycosylation, which involves the attachment of carbohydrate to the side chain of certain amino acids. Where the method of the invention is used to determine the amino acid sequence of a post-translationally modified peptide, the modifications are typically removed from the peptide prior to the analysis, taking due care to leave the peptide intact. Methods for removing post-translational modifications from peptides are well known in the art, and include, for example, the removal of N-linked carbohydrates with enzymes, such as peptide-N-glycosidase F (PNGase F), endo-glycosidases, mixtures of exo-glycosidases, etc., and the removal of phosphate modification with phosphatases. In addition, other techniques for removing modifications occasionally found on peptides are well known in the art. However, where a specific modification to a specific amino acid is known to be present in the unknown peptide, the modified amino acid may be included in the defined set of amino acids that theory or experimental results teach may be included in Peptide X, and, thus, the sequence of the peptide containing the modified peptide may be determined with the method of the present invention. All combinations of amino acids having a total mass equal to the measured mass of Peptide X are calculated, allowing for water lost in determining peptide links, protonation, etc. Any individual amino acid may be included as part of any given combination at any integral stoichiometry up to the amount consistent with the mass determined for Peptide X. These combinations comprise all of the allowed combinations of amino acids combinations for Peptide X, and, therefore, the actual amino acid compositions of Peptide X will be represented in one and only one ofthese combinations. Furthermore, these combinations are generally peptide-specific. An allowed library of linear peptides is then constructed from the allowed combinations ofamino acids. The allowed library is constructed by generating all possible linear permutations of the sequence of amino acids in each combination, using all the amino adds in each combination. The allowed library comprises all such permutations of the amino acids, and therefore must include Peptide X. The allowed library of peptides having the same molecular mass as Peptide X is typically constructed independently and ab initio for each new unknown peptide that is sequenced. That is, a new library is typically constructed as part of each analysis, and for only that analysis. However, as will be clear to one of ordinary skill in the art, once a library of all peptides having a given molecular mass has been constructed, that library may be used for the determination of the amino acid sequence of any other peptide of that particular molecular mass. This differs fundamentally from existing data base approaches in which a single data base of known sequences, which is subject to periodic updates and refinements based on the availability of experimentally determined sequences, is used for all analyses. As a result, with the method of the present invention, the determination of new and previously unknown peptides sequences that are not present in any experimentally determined peptide sequence library is possible by direct peptide analysis in a non-step-wise, operator-independent automated process. In addition, the method of the invention is not constrained to the conventional twenty amino acids, or to their conventional modifications. In a preferred embodiment, as shown in the flow chart provided in Fig. 2a, additional information relating to Peptide X is used to place constraints on the allowed combinations of amino acids and/ or allowed peptide sequences in the library, and, thus, reduce the number of possible sequences. Useful information related to Peptide X includes, but is not limited to, partial amino acid composition. For example, the mass spectrum used to determine the mass of Peptide X may include fragments that can be used to identify specific amino acids present in Peptide X. Where it is known that certain amino acids are definitely present in Peptide X, constraints are placed on the allowed combinations and allowed library by requiring the identified amino acids to be present in all combinations and, thus, in every peptide present in the library. Fig. 2b illustrates a system whereby more than one constraint is put on the library of possible linear sequences. By way of illustration only, for each peptide to be analysed (whether purified or present in a mixture), information on its mass (e.g. by MALDI-MS) and a tandem mass spectrum from it (e.g. by ESI-tandem MS) are obtained. The tandem mass spectrum can then be interpreted in an automated manner, to obtain certain information about the unknown peptide. Suitable software evaluates the following information, when possible, from a tandem MS spectrum in an automated manner: i. Information on amino acids contained in the peptide by analysing the immonium ions region. ii. Identification of the two N-terminal amino acids by identifying the b 2 /a 2 ion pairs. iii. Based on the use of trypsin, the C-terminal residue must be lysine or arginine. These can be identified in the spectrum and the spectrum interpreted to find the next amino acids. iv. Partial internal sequence information can be obtained by identifying y series of ions with defined accuracy of mass measurement at ≤ 100 ppm. A discussion of manual spectrum interpretation is provided in Medzihradsky and Burlingame, A Companion to Methods in Enzymology 6: 284-303 (1994). Again with reference to Figs. 1 and 2, the allowed library, which has preferably been constrained, is then used as the basis for generating theoretical fragmentation patterns that are compared to the experimental fragmentation pattern obtained for Peptide X. The fragmentation patterns may be obtained by any suitable means known in the art. Preferably, the fragmentation patterns are mass spectra, and the method used to match the theoretical and experimental mass spectra is that disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,538,897. However, protease or chemical fragmentation, coupled to HPLC separation of the fragments, may also be used to obtain the experimental fragmentation patterns. Preferably, in a determination of the amino acid sequence of Peptide X, the molecular mass of Peptide X is determined with high accuracy, typically, to within about 30 ppm (parts per million). An example of such a spectrum is provided in Fig. 3, where the molecular mass of Peptide X is determined from the peak at 774.3928 daltons. In addition, as a result of the partial fragmentation of Peptide X that can occur, fragments that identify certain amino acids that are contained in Peptide X are also observed, allowing the peptide library to be constrained. An example of this portion of the mass spectrum for Peptide X is provided in Fig. 4. Peptide X is then subjected to collision-induced dissociation in a mass spectrometer. The parent peptide and its fragments are then introduced into the second mass spectrometer that provides an intensity or count and the mass to charge ratio, m/z, for each of the fragments in the fragment mixture. Each fragment ion is represented in a bar graph in which the abscissa value is m/z and the ordinate value is the intensity. A variety of mass spectrometer types can be used, including, but not limited to, triple-quadrapole mass spectrometry, Fourier-transform cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, tandem time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and quadrapole ion trap mass spectrometry. The experimental fragment spectrum is then compared to the mass spectra predicted for the sequences of the allowed library, to identify one or more predicted mass spectra that closely match the experimental mass spectrum. Because the allowed library includes all permutations of amino acid sequences that have a total mass corresponding to that of Peptide X, Peptide X must be represented in the allowed library. The predicted fragmentation spectra may be obtained and compared to the experimental fragmentation spectrum by employing a method that involves first normalizing the experimental fragmentation spectrum. This may be accomplished by converting the experimental fragmentation spectrum to a list of masses and intensities. The peak values for Peptide X are removed, and the square root of the remaining intensity values is calculated, and normalized to a maximum value of 100. The 200 most intense ions are divided into ten mass regions, and the maximum intensity within each region is again normalized to 100. Each ion within 3.0 daltons of its neighbour on either side is given an intensity value equal to the greater of the intensity of the ion or that of its neighbour. Other normalization methods can be used, and it is possible to perform the analysis without normalizing. However, in general, normalization is preferred. In particular, maximum normalized values, the number of intense ions, the number of mass regions, and the size of the window for assuming the intensity value of a near neighbour may all be independently varied to larger or smaller values. A fragment mass spectrum is predicted for each of the candidate sequences. The fragment mass spectrum is predicted by calculating the fragment ion masses for the type b and y ions for the amino acid sequence. When a peptide is fragmented and the charge is retained on the N-terminal cleavage fragment, the resulting ion is labelled as a b-type ion. If the charge is retained on the C-terminal fragment, it is labelled a y-type ion. Masses for type b ions were calculated by summing the amino acid masses and adding the mass of a proton. Masses for type y ions were calculated by summing, from the C-terminus, the masses of the amino acids and adding the mass of water and a proton to the initial amino acid. In this way, it is possible to calculate an m/z value for each fragment. However, in order to provide a predicted mass spectrum, it is also necessary to assign an intensity value for each fragment. Although it is often possible to predict, on a theoretical basis, an intensity value for each fragment, this procedure is difficult, and it has been found useful to assign intensities in the following fashion. The value of 50.0 is assigned to each b and y ion. To masses of 1 dalton on either side of the fragment ion, an intensity of 25.0 is assigned. Peak intensities of 10.0 are assigned at mass peaks 17.0 and 18.0 daltons below the m/z of each b and y ion location, to account for both NH 3 and H 2 O loss, and peak intensities of 10.0 are assigned to mass peaks 28.0 daltons below each type b ion location, to account for CO loss. After calculation of predicted m/z values and assignment of intensities, it is preferred to calculate a measure of closeness-of-fit between the predicted mass spectra and the experimentally-derived fragment spectrum. A number of methods for calculating closeness-of-fit are available. For example, a two-step method may be used that includes calculating a preliminary closeness-of-fit score, referred to here as S p , and calculating a correlation function for the highest-scoring amino acid sequences. In the preferred embodiment, S p is calculated using the following formula: S p = (Σi m )*n i * (1+β)*(1-ρ)/n τ where i m are the matched intensities, n i are the number of matched fragment ions, β is the type b and y ion continuity, p is the presence of immonium ions and their respective amino acids in the predicted sequence, and n τ is the total number of fragment ions. The factor β evaluates the continuity ofa fragment ion series. If there is a fragment ion match for the ion immediately preceding the current type b or y ion, β is incremented by 0.075 from an initial value of 0.0. This increases the preliminary score for those peptides matching a successive series of type b and y ions, since extended series of ions of the same type are often observed in MS/MS spectra. The factor p evaluates the presence of immonium ions in the low mass end of the mass spectrum. The detection of immonium ions may be used diagnostically to determine the presence of certain types of amino acids in the sequence. For example, if immonium ions are present at 110.0, 120.0, or 136.0 + 1.0 daltons in the processed data file of the unknown peptide with normalized intensities greater than 40.0, indicating the presence ofhistidine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine respectively, then the sequence under evaluation is checked for the presence of the amino acid indicated by the immonium ion. The preliminary score, S p , for the peptide is either increased or decreased by a factor of 1-ρ, where ρ is the sum of the penalties for each of the three amino acids whose presence is indicated in the low mass region. Each individual p can take on the value of -0.15 if there is a corresponding low mass peak, and the amino acid is not present in the sequence, +0.15 if there is a corresponding low mass peak and the amino acid is present in the sequence, or 0.0 if the low mass peak is not present. The total penalty can range from -0.45, where all three low mass peaks are present in the spectrum, but are not present in the sequence, to +0.45, where all three low mass peaks are present in the spectrum, and are present in the sequence. Following the calculation of the preliminary closeness-of-fit score, S p , the predicted mass spectra having the highest S p scores are selected for further analysis using the correlation function. The number of candidate predicted mass spectra that are selected for further analysis will depend largely on the computational resources and time available. For purposes of calculating the correlation function, the experimentally-derived fragment spectrum is typically preprocessed in a fashion somewhat different from preprocessing employed before calculating S p . For purposes of the correlation function, the precursor ion is removed from the spectrum, and the spectrum is divided into 10 sections. Ions in each section are then normalized to 50.0. The section-wise normalized spectra are then used for calculating the correlation function. The discrete correlation between the two functions may be calculated as: where τ is a lag value. The discrete correlation theorem states that the discrete correlation of two real functions x and y is one member of the discrete Fourier transform pair R τ ∓± X τ Y*τ where X(t) and Y(t) are the discrete Fourier transforms of x(i) and y(i), and the Y* denotes complex conjugation. Therefore, the cross-correlations can be computed by Fourier transformation of the two data sets using the fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm, multiplication of one transform by the complex conjugate of the other, and inverse transformation of the resulting product. The predicted spectra as well as the pre-processed unknown spectrum may be zero-padded to 4096 data points, since the MS/MS spectra are not periodic, as intended by the correlation theorem, and the FFT algorithm requires N to be a integer power of two, so the resulting end effects need to be considered. The final score attributed to each candidate peptide sequence is R(0) minus the mean ofthe cross-correlation function over the range -75<t<75. This modified "correlation parameter", described in Powell and Heiftje, Anal. Chim. Acta, 100:313-327 (1978), shows better discrimination over just the spectral correlation coefficient R(0). The raw scores are normalized to 1.0. Preferably, the output includes the normalized raw score, the candidate peptide mass, the unnormalized correlation coefficient, the preliminary score, the fragment ion continuity β, the immonium ion factor τ, the number of type b and y ions matched out of the total number of fragment ions, their matched intensities, the protein accession number, and the candidate peptide sequence. The correlation function can be used to select automatically one of the predicted mass spectra as corresponding to the experimentally-derived fragment spectrum. Preferably, however, a number of sequences from the library are output and final selection of a single sequence is done by a skilled operator. Depending on the computing and time resources available, it may be advantageous to employ data-reduction techniques. Preferably, these techniques will emphasize the most informative ions in the spectrum while not unduly affecting search speed. One technique involves considering only some ofthe fragment ions in the MS/MS spectrum, which, for a peptide, may contain as many as 3,000 fragment ions. According to one data reduction strategy, the ions are ranked by intensity, and some fraction of the most intense ions is used for comparison. Another approach involves subdividing the spectrum into a small number of regions, e.g., about 5, and using the 50 most intense ions in each region as part of the data set. Yet another approach involves selecting ions based on the probability of those ions being sequence ions. For example, ions could be selected which exist in mass windows of 57 through 186 daltons, i.e., the range of mass increments for the 20 common amino acids from glycine to tryptophan that contain diagnostic features of type b or y ions, such as losses of 17 or 18 daltons, corresponding to ammonia and water, or a loss of 28 daltons, corresponding to CO. A number of different scoring algorithms can be used for determining preliminary closeness-of-fit or correlation. In addition to scoring based on the number of matched ions multiplied by the sum of the intensity, scoring can be based on the percentage of continuous sequence coverage represented by the sequence ions in the spectrum. For example, a 10 residue peptide will potentially contain 9 each of b and y type sequence ions. If a set of ions extends from b 1 to b 9 , then a score of 100 is awarded, but if a discontinuity is observed in the middle of the sequence, such as a missing b 5 ion, a penalty is assessed. The maximum score is awarded for an amino acid sequence that contains a continuous ion series in both the b and y directions. In the event that the described scoring procedures do not delineate an answer, an additional technique for spectral comparison can be used in which the database is initially searched with a molecular weight value and a reduced set of fragment ions. Initial filtering of the database occurs by matching sequence ions, and generating a score with one of the methods described above. The resulting set of answers will then undergo a more rigorous inspection process using a modified full MS/MS spectrum. For the second stage analysis, one of several spectral matching approaches developed for spectral library searching is used. This will require generating a "library spectrum" for the peptide sequence, based on the sequence ions predicted for that amino acid sequence. Intensity values for sequence ions of the "library spectrum" will be obtained from the experimental spectrum. If a fragment ion is predicted at m/z 256, then the intensity value for the ion in the experimental spectrum at m/z 256 will be used as the intensity of the ion in the predicted spectrum. Thus, if the predicted spectrum is identical to the "unknown" spectrum, it will represent an ideal spectrum. The spectra will then be compared using a correlation function. In general, it is believed that the majority of computational time for the above procedure is spent in the iterative search process. By multiplexing the analysis of multiple MS/MS spectra in one pass through the database, an overall improvement in efficiency will be realized. In addition, the mass tolerance used in the initial pre-filtering can affect search times by increasing or decreasing the number of sequences to analyze in subsequent steps. Another approach to speeding up searches involves a binary encryption scheme where the mass spectrum is encoded as peak/no peak at every mass depending on whether the peak is above a certain threshold value. If intensive use of a protein sequence library is contemplated, it may be possible to calculate and store predicted mass values of all sub-sequences within a predetermined range of masses so that at least some of the analysis can be performed by table look-up rather than calculation. EXAMPLES The following non-limiting examples are merely illustrative of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are not to be construed as limiting the invention, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims. EXAMPLE 1. The amino acid sequence of unknown Peptide X was determined using the method of the invention. The molecular mass of Peptide X was first determined using a matrix-assisted laser-desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Voyager Elite, manufactured by Perseptive Biosystems) with delayed extraction and post source decay. As shown in Fig. 3, the mass of the protonated form of Peptide X form is 774.3928 daltons, which indicates a mass of 773.3928 daltons for Peptide X. The set of amino acids that are possibly part of Peptide X were then defined for consideration in the analysis. The defined set of amino acids with the molecular mass of each amino acid less the mass of the one water molecule lost during peptide bond formation is provided below. The molecular masses are given in daltons or a.m.u. tryptophan = 186.079313 carbamido cysteine = 160.03065 arginine = 156.10111 phenylalanine = 147.068414 histidine = 137.058912 methionine = 131.04085 glutamic acid = 129.042593 lysine = 128.094963 glutamine = 128.058577 asparagine = 114.042927 aspartic acid = 115.026943 isoleucine = 113.084064 leucine = 113.084064 cysteine = 103.009185 threonine = 101.047678 valine = 99.068414 proline = 97.052764 serine = 87.032028 alanine = 71.037114 glycine = 57.021464 tyrosine = 163.063328 The allowed combinations of amino acids for Peptide X were determined by first determining the molecular mass of Peptide X, as described above, to an experimental accuracy of 30 ppm (parts per million). Therefore, each allowed combination of amino acids in the allowed library must have a total mass of 773.3928 ± 30 ppm. In addition to providing the molecular mass of Peptide X, the first mass spectrum also confirmed the presence of certain amino acids in Peptide X. The immonium region of this mass spectrum, which shows the presence ofthese amino acids, is given in Fig. 4. In particular, the immonium region of the spectrum indicates the presence of arginine with a characteristic mass of 174.988, leucine/isoleucine with a characteristic mass at 85.8851 (these amino acids have the same mass, and are therefore not distinguishable by mass alone), histidine with a characteristic mass at 109.823, and tyrosine with a characteristic mass at 135.915. Therefore, it was possible to constrain the allowed library to sets containing arginine, leucine/isoleucine, histidine, and tyrosine, having a total molecular mass of 773.3928 ± 30 ppm. To determine the sets of amino acids that have a total molecular mass of 773.3928 ± 30 ppm, the following equation was applied: MM x = Σ (histidine) + (tyrosine) + (leucine/isoleucine) + (arginine) + (H 2 O) + (aa 1 ) + ----+ (aa n ), where aa 1 ---- aa n are any of the allowed amino acids, other than arginine, isoleucine, histidine, and tyrosine. The only combinations of amino acids that can have a total molecular mass of 773.3928 + 30 ppm are as follows: 1) tryptophan, arginine, leucine/isoleucine, histidine, and tyrosine. 2) glutamic acid, glycine, arginine, leucine/isoleucine, histidine, and tyrosine. 3) alanine, aspartic acid, arginine, leucine/isoleucine, histidine, and tyrosine. These combinations constitute the allowed sets of amino acids for Peptide X. In addition, Peptide X was obtained by a tryptic cleavage, and, therefore, from the accepted specificity of trypsin, Peptide X must also have lysine or arginine as its carboxy terminal amino acid. With this constraint, the allowed library of linear peptides was constructed from all individual linear permutations of combinations 1, 2, and 3. The allowed library includes 528 linear peptides, one set of 264 peptides containing isoleucine (shown below) and a corresponding set of 264 peptides in which isoleucine is replaced by leucine (not shown). 1) YIHWR 54) HIYGER 107) HGYEIR 160) DYHIAR 213) IADYHR 2) IYHWR 55) YIGHER 108) GHYEIR 161) HDYIAR 214) AIDYHR 3) YHIWR 56) IYGHER 109) YEGHIR 162) DHYIAR 215) DAIYHR 4) HYIWR 57) YGIHER 110) EYGHIR 163) IHDYAR 216) ADIYHR 5) IHYWR 58) GYIHER 111) YGEHIR 164) HIDYAR 217) YHDAIR 6) HIYWR 59) IGYHER 112) GYEHIR 165) IDHYAR 218) HYDAIR 7) YIWHR 60) GIYHER 113) EGYHIR 166) DIHYAR 219) YDHAIR 8) IYWHR 61) YHGIER 114) GEYHIR 167) HDIYAR 220) DYHAIR 9) YWIHR 62) HYGIER 115) HEGYIR 168) DHIYAR 221) HDYAIR 10) WYIHR 63) YGHIER 116) EHGYIR 169) YIHADR 222) DHYAIR 11) IWYHR 64) GYHIER 117) HGEYIR 170) IYHADR 223) YHADIR 12) WIYHR 65) HGYIER 118) GHEYIR 171) YHIADR 224) HYADIR 13) YHWIR 66) GHYIER 119) EGHYIR 172) HYIADR 225) YAHDIR 14) HYWIR 67) IHGYER 120) GEHYIR 173) IHYADR 226) AYHDIR 15) YWHIR 68) HIGYER 121) IHEGYR 174) HIYADR 227) HAYDIR 16) WYHIR 69) IGHYER 122) HIEGYR 175) YIAHDR 228) AHYDIR 17) HWYIR 70) GIHYER 123) IEHGYR 176) IYAHDR 229) YDAHIR 18) WHYIR 71) HGIYER 124) EIHGYR 177) YAIHDR 230) DYAHIR 19) IHWYR 72) GHIYER 125) HEIGYR 178) AYIHDR 231) YADHIR 20) HIWYR 73) YIEGHR 126) EHIGYR 179) IAYHDR 232) AYDHIR 21) IWHYR 74) IYEGHR 127) IHGEYR 180) AIYHDR 233) DAYHIR 22) WIHYR 75) YEIGHR 128) HIGEYR 181) YHAIDR 234) ADYHIR 23) HWIYR 76) EYIGHR 129) IGHEYR 182) HYAIDR 23 5) HDAYIR 24) WHIYR 77) IEYGHR 130) GIHEYR 183) YAHIDR 236) DHAYIR 25)YIHEGR 78) EIYGHR 131) HGIEYR 184) AYHIDR 237) HADYIR 26) IYHEGR 79) YIGEHR 132) GHIEYR 185) HAYIDR 238) AHDYIR 27) YHIEGR 80) IYGEHR 133) IEGHYR 186) AHYIDR 239) DAHYIR 28) HYEGR 81) YGIEHR 134) EIGHYR 187) IHAYDR 240) ADHYIR 29) IHYEGR 82) GYIEHR 135) IGEHYR 188) HIAYDR 241) IHDAYR 30) HIYEGR 83) IGYEHR 136) GIEHYR 189) IAHYDR 242) HIDAYR 31) YIEHGR 84) GIYEHR 137) EGIHYR 190) AIHYDR 243) IDHAYR 32) IYEHGR 85) YEGIHR 138) GEIHYR 191) HAIYDR 244) DIHAYR 33) YEIHGR 86) EYGIHR 139) HEGIYR 192) AHIYDR 245) HDIAYR 34) EYIHGR 87) YGEIHR 140) EHGIYR 193) YIDAHR 246) DHIAYR 35) IEYHGR 88) GYEIHR 141) HGEIYR 194) IYDAHR 247) IHADYR 36) EIYHGR 89) EGYIHR 142) GHEIYR 195) YDIAHR 248) HIADYR 37) YHEIGR 90) GEYIHR 143) EGHIYR 196) DYIAHR 249) IAHDYR 38) HYEIGR 91) IEGYHR 144) GEHIYR 197) IDYAHR 250) AIHDYR 39) YEHIGR 92) EIGYHR 145) YIHDAR 198) DIYAHR 251) HAIDYR 40) EYHIGR 93) IGEYHR 146) IYHDAR 199) YIADHR 252) AHIDYR 41) HEYIGR 94) GIEYHR 147) YHIDAR 200) IYADHR 253) IDAHYR 42) EHYIGR 55) EGIYHR 148) HYIDAR 201) YAIDHR 254) DIAHYR 43) IHEYGR 96) GEIYHR 149) IHYDAR 202) AYIDHR 255) IADHYR 44) HIEYGR 97) YHEGIR 150) HIYDAR 203) IAYDHR 256) AIDHYR 45) IEHYGR 98) HYEGIR 151) YIDHAR 204) AIYDHR 257) DAIHYR 46) EIHYGR 99) YEHGIR 152) IYDHAR 205) YDAIHR 258) ADIHYR 47) HEIYGR 100) EYHGIR 153) YDIHAR 206) DYAIHR 259) HDAIYR 48) EHIYGR 101) HEYGIR 154) DYIHAR 207) YADIHR 260) HADIYR 49) YIHGER 102) EHYGIR 155) IDYHAR 208) AYDIHR 261) HADIYR 50) IYHGER 103) YHGEIR 156) DIYHAR 209) DAYIHR 262) AHDIYR 51) YHIGER 104) HYGEIR 157) YHDIAR 210) ADYIHR 263) DAHIYR 52) HYIGER 105) YGHEIR 158) HYDIAR 211) IDAYHR 264) ADHIYR 53) IHYGER 106) GYHEIR 159) YDHIAR 212) DIAYHR The method of U.S. Patent No. 5,538,897 was then used to match Peptide X to this library by MS/MS. The experimental tandem mass spectrum of Peptide X is shown in Fig. 5, and the 10 top ranking peptides matched to this spectrum are provided below. It was determined that the sequence of Peptide X is that of the top ranked peptide, AHYDIR. Rank/Sp (M+H) Cn C*10^4 S p Ions Reference Peptide 1/1 774.9 1.0000 1.8118 491.0 11/15 p(228) (-)AHYDIR 2/3 774.9 0.9308 1.6864 386.2 10/15 p(238) (-)AHDYIR 3/2 774.9 0.8012 1.4516 414.3 10/15 p(227) (-)HAYDIR 4/5 774.9 0.7319 1.3262 320.5 9/15 p(237) (-)HADYIR 5/1 774.9 0.7168 1.2987 491.0 11/15 p(186) (-)AHYIDR 6/12 774.9 0.6131 1.1108 248.3 9/15 p(226) (-)AYHDIR 7/3 774.9 0.6033 1.0930 386.2 10/15 p(192) (-)AHIYDR 8/9 774.9 0.5878 1.0651 264.1 9/15 p(225) (-)YAHDIR 9/50 774.9 0.5850 1.0599 156.5 7/15 p(219) (-)YDHAIR 10/14 774.9 0.5825 1.0553 247.9 9/15 p(217) (-)YHDAIR EXAMPLE 2. The amino acid sequence of Peptide Y, a known, standard peptide, was determined using the method of the invention, as applied to Peptide X in Example 1. Peptide Y has the following amino acid sequence: YGGFIRR. The molecular mass of Peptide Y was determined to be 868.4719 to an experimental accuracy of 30 ppm from the mass spectrum shown in Fig. 6. The masses at 1296.6854 and 1570.6774 are from internal standards, added to allow instrument calibration. The set of amino acids that are possibly part of Peptide Y were then defined for consideration in the analysis. The defined set of amino acids with the molecular mass of each amino acid less the mass of the one water molecule lost during peptide bond formation is the same as those used in Example 1. As the mass of Peptide Y was measured as 868.4719 to an experimental accuracy of ± 30 ppm, each allowed amino acid combination must therefore have a total mass equal to 868.4719 ± 30 ppm. In addition, from the immonium ion region of the PSD trace from Fig. 6, shown in Fig. 7, it was determined that Peptide Y must also contain the following amino acids: tyrosine with a characteristic mass at 136.027, phenylalanine with a characteristic mass at 120.071, arginine with a characteristic mass at 175.00, and leucine or isoleucine with a characteristic mass at 85.9225. Application of the equation in Example 1 demonstrated that only the following combinations of amino acids are allowed for Peptide Y: 1) Tyrosine, phenylalanine, arginine, asparagine, and arginine. 2) Tyrosine, phenylalanine, arginine, arginine, leucine/isoleucine, glycine, and glycine. 3) Tyrosine, phenylalanine, arginine, leucine/isoleucine, alanine, alanine, and glutamine. 4) Tyrosine, phenylalanine, arginine, leucine/isoleucine, glycine, valine, and asparagine. 5) Tyrosine, phenylalanine, arginine, leucine/isoleucine, glycine, glycine, glycine, and valine. 6) Tyrosine, phenylalanine, arginine, leucine/isoleucine, glycine, alanine, alanine, and alanine. These combinations constitute the allowed set of amino acid combinations for Peptide Y. In addition, Peptide Y was obtained by a tryptic cleavage, and, thus, from the accepted specificity of trypsin, Peptide Y must also have lysine or arginine as its carboxy terminal amino acid. With this constraint, the allowed library of linear peptides for Peptide Y is constructed from all individual linear permutations of the combinations above. The allowed library includes over 20,000 peptides, and is thus not shown. As with Example 1, the method of U.S. Patent No. 5,538,897 was then used to match Peptide Y to this library by tandem mass spectrometry. The experimental tandem mass spectrum of Peptide Y is shown in Fig. 8, and the top 10 ranking peptides matched to this spectrum are given below. Of these ten, the top ranking peptide, YGGFIRR is known to be Peptide Y. Rank/Sp (M+H) Cn C^4 S p Ions Reference Peptide 1/3 868. 51.000 1.894 376.6 11/24 p(415) (-)YGGFFIR 2/1 868.5 0.967 1.831 440.4 11/24 p(298) (-)YGGRIFR 3/15 868.5 0.966 1.83 322.8 11/28 p(1975) (-)YGGFIGVR 4/15 868.5 0.965 1.828 322.8 11/28 p(1735) (-)YGGFIVGR 5/5 868.5 0.961 1.821 361.7 11/24 p(454) (-)YGGRFIR 6/2 868.5 0.96 1.819 408.0 11/24 p(1311) (-)YGVNIFR 7/12 868.5 0.951 1.802 333.7 11/24 p(1527) (-)YGVNFIR 8/8 868.5 0.942 1.783 356.9 11/28 p(2153) (-)YGGGVIFR 9/13 868.5 0.937 1.775 331.0 11/24 p(394) (-)YGGIFRR 10/8 868.5 0.935 1.771 356.9 11/28 p(2147) (-)YGGVGIFR EXAMPLE 3. The amino acid sequence of Peptide Z, a known standard peptide, was determined using the method of the invention, as applied to Peptide X in Example 1 and Peptide Y in Example 2. Peptide Z has the following amino acid sequence: RPPGFSPFR. The molecular mass of Peptide Z was determined to be 1060.5660 to an experimental accuracy of 30 ppm from the mass spectrum shown in Fig. 9. The masses at 1181.64 77, 1296.6933 and 1570.6774 are from internal standards, added to allow instrument calibration. The set of amino acids that are possibly part of Peptide Z were then defined for consideration in the analysis. The defined set of amino acids with the molecular mass of each amino acid less the mass of the one water molecule lost during peptide bond formation is the same as those used in Examples 1 and 2. As the mass of Peptide Z was measured as 1060.5660 to an experimental accuracy of 30 ppm, each allowed amino acid combination must therefore sum to a mass equal to 1060.5660 ± 30 ppm. In addition, from the immonium ion region of the PSD trace from Fig. 9, shown in Fig. 10, it was determined that Peptide Z must also contain the following amino acids: phenylalanine with a characteristic mass at 120.20, arginine with a characteristic mass at 174.94, serine together with proline as deduced from the mass at 167.23, and glycine together with proline as deduced from the mass at 155.66. Application of the equation in Example 1 was used to determine the allowed combinations of amino acids for Peptide Z, and demonstrates that only the following combinations of amino acids are allowed for Peptide Y: PTIW + FRPSG GAAAAR + FRPSG GVVNK + FRPSG AVVID + FRPSG WIW + FRPSF GPPVF + FRPSG ASPNK + FRPSG SPVVD + FRPSG GQRR + FRPSG GPVIM + FRPSG GGAAIK + FRPSG GVINN + FRPSG ANRR + FRPSG APVVM + FRPSG GGGPTK + FRPSG AVVNN + FRPSG GOARR + FRPSG AAIIE + FRPSG GGGVVK + FRPSG GGGVIN + FRPSG PPFR + FRPSG GPTIE + FRPSG GAAAVK + FRPSG GAAAIN + FRPSG PIMR + FRPSG GVVIE + FRPSG GGASPK + FRPSG GGAWN + FRPSG VIER + FRPSG ASPIE + FRPSG IQQQ + FRPSG AAAAVN + FRPSG VNQR+FRPSG APVTE+FRPSG GAIQQ+FRPSG SSPII+FRPSG CGVQR + FRPSG AVVVE + FRPSG AAVQQ + FRPSG SPVTI + FRPSG AAAQR + FRPSG GSPKK + FRPSG AAINQ + FRPSG GGGGGVI + FRPSG IIDR + FRPSG IQQK +FRPSG GVVNQ + FRPSG GGGAAAAI + FRPSG INM + FRPSG GAIQK + FRPSG GGAAIQ + FRPSG PPTTT + FRPSG GGINR + FRPSG AAVQK + FRPSG GGGVVQ + FRPSG PVVTT+FRPSG GAVNR+FRPSG GSPQK+FRPSG AAAVQ+FRPSG GGGGAVV + FRPSG GGGGIR + FRPSG AAINY + FRPSG GVIID + FRPSG GGAAAAV + FRPSG GGGAVR + FRPSG GPTNK + FRPSG APTID + FRPSG AAAAAAA + FRPSG These combinations constitute the allowed set of amino acid combinations for Peptide Z. In addition, Peptide Z was obtained by a tryptic cleavage, and, from the accepted specificity of trypsin, Peptide Z must have lysine or arginine as its carboxy terminal amino acid. With this constraint, the allowed library of linear peptides for Peptide Z is constructed from all individual linear permutations of the combinations above. The allowed library includes over 2,000,000 peptides, and is thus not shown. As with Examples 1 and 2, the method of U.S. Patent No. 5,538,897 was then used to match Peptide Z to this library by tandem mass spectrometry. The experimental tandem mass spectrum of Peptide Z is shown in Fig. 11, and the top 10 ranking peptides matched to this spectrum provided below. Of these ten, the top ranking peptide, RPPGFSPFR is known to be Peptide Z. Rank/Sp (M+EI) Cn C*10 4 Sp Ions Reference Peptide 1/1 1061.2 1.000 3.310 1163.5 19/24 p(135) (-)RPPGFSPFR 2/2 1061.2 0.871 2.884 1126.6 19/24 p(120) (-)RPPGFPSFR 3/5 1061.2 0.857 2.835 824.7 19/24 P(122) (-)RPPFGPSFR 4/11 1061.2 0.849 2.811 692.8 16/24 P(164) (-)RPPGFFPSR 5/4 1061.2 0.833 2.759 831.2 17/24 p(189) (-)RPPGFFSPR 6/3 1061.2 0.831 2.749 872.9 17/24 p(131) (-)RPPSFGPFR 7/6 1061.2 0.819 2.711 797.1 17/24 p(126) (-)RPFGPPSFR 8/12 1061.2 0.806 2.668 674.0 16/24 p(100) (-)RPPGPSFFR 9/13 1061.2 0.792 2.623 668.4 16/24 p(137) (-)RFPPGSPFR 10/14 1061.2 0.782 2.588 656.5 16/24 p(138) (-)RFGPPSPFR

Claims: A method for determining the amino acid sequence of an unknown peptide, which comprises: (a) determining a molecular mass and an experimental mass fragmentation spectrum for the unknown peptide; (b) calculating theoretical mass fragmentation spectra for a theoretical peptide library composed of all possible linear sequences of amino acids having a total mass that corresponds to the molecular mass of the unknown peptide, and assigning an intensity to each of these sequences.; (c) comparing the experimental mass fragmentation spectrum of the unknown peptide to the theoretical spectra; and (d) identifying a peptide in the theoretical peptide library having a theoretical mass fragmentation spectrum that matches most closely the mass fragmentation spectrum of the unknown peptide. The method of claim 1, wherein the molecular mass for the unknown peptide is determined with an accuracy of up to about 30 parts per million. The method of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the total mass of each of the possible linear sequences of amino acids is within the range of plus or minus about 30 parts per million of the molecular mass of the unknown peptide. The method of any preceding claim, further comprising calculating an indication of closeness-of-fit between the experimental fragmentation spectrum of the unknown peptide and each of the theoretical fragmentation spectra calculated for the peptide library. The method of claim 4, further comprising selecting peak values having an intensity greater than a predetermined threshold value when calculating the indication of closeness-of-fit. The method of any preceding claim, further comprising normalizing the experimental fragmentation spectrum. The method of any preceding claim, wherein the amino acids are selected from tryptophan, arginine, histidine, glutamic acid, glutamine, aspartic acid, leucine, threonine, proline, alanine, tyrosine, carbamido cysteine, phenylalanine, methionine, lysine, asparagine, isoleucine, cysteine, valine, serine, and glycine. The method of any of claims 1 to 6, wherein the amino acids comprise non-natural amino acids or chemically modified forms of the naturally occurring amino acids. The method of any preceding claim, wherein the unknown peptide has a molecular mass greater than about 1,400 Daltons. The method of any preceding claim, wherein the molecular mass for the unknown peptide is determined using a mass spectrometer. The method of claim 10, wherein the mass spectrometer is a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The method of claim 10, wherein the molecular mass and the fragmentation spectrum for the unknown peptide are determined using a tandem mass spectrometer. A method according to any preceding claim, which additionally comprises the identification of one or more amino acids in the unknown peptide from its experimental fragmentation spectrum, or from its method of preparation, and using the one or more identified amino acids to constrain the library of all possible linear sequences. The method of claim 12, wherein the spectrum has an immonium ion region, and the immonium region is used to identify one or more amino acids contained in the unknown peptide. The method of claim 13 or claim 14, wherein the identification comprises comparing a known characteristic of amino acids with characteristics of the experimental fragmentation spectrum. The method of any of claims 13 to 15, wherein said one or more amino acids is or includes the N-terminal or C-terminal amino acid.

Inventors: PAREKH RAJESH BHIKHU, PRIME SALLY BARBARA, TOWNSEND ROBERT REID, WEDD NICK SINCLAIR, PAREKH, RAJESH BHIKHU, PRIME, SALLY BARBARA, TOWNSEND, ROBERT REID, WEDD, NICK SINCLAIR, PAREKH, Rajesh Bhikhu Oxford GlycoSciences (UK)ltd
Applicants: OXFORD GLYCOSCIENCES UK LTD, OXFORD GLYCOSCIENCES (UK) LIMITED
Application year: 1998
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: G01N27, G01N33