AIR JET PIDDLING

Abstract: An improved aspirating jet piddler that has no moving parts and operates to achieve a soft laydown with reduced tangling.

Description: TITLE AIR JET PIDDLING FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to improvements in and relating to air jet piddling, and more particularly to an improved piddler that uses an air jet and to an improved process relating thereto and to improved products obtained thereby. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION /An integral step in many processes or systems for the production of textile fibers has been the collection of a rapidly moving multifilamentary strand in a container for transport to the next processing step. This process, often called piddling or canning, has provided a means by which one or more filamentary strands (referred to herein as tow or rope) were collected and possibly combined before processing through a draw/crimp step, which is often performed at a speed that has generally been much slower than the previous step, such as, for example, spinning a synthetic polymer to form synthetic filaments. A longstanding problem in the piddling process has been how to deposit such a rapidly-moving line into the can in such a way as to avoid entanglements that may be a problem particularly upon subsequent removal of product from the can. Several methods are available commercially and/or have been published. The system of piddling a textile rope that is currently preferred commercially involves using a pair of toothed rolls to pull a tow from the primary (withdrawal) spinning rolls. Such toothed rolls, often referred to as gear rolls, gear plaiters or sunflower rolls, are available on piddler systems marketed by IWKA, Neumag, and Fleissner, for example. In these units, the toothed rolls are intended to pull the tow strand from a previous roll and to release the strand in such a way that it (1) does not wrap any rolls, and (2) is distributed so as to land softly in the can. To accomplish the first objective (a low wrap potential) , large diameter rolls are used with many teeth to provide a small fiber contact area at the tip of each tooth. To enhance release of the filaments, the teeth are often coated with a low friction material and the surface speed of the toothed rolls is often greater than the speed of the moving tow band to enable the teeth to slip over the fibers and to avoid developing too much static friction. A soft landing of the moving tow line into the can is caused primarily by converting a large portion of the velocity of the moving tow band into a horizontal component. This is accomplished primarily by intermeshing the teeth from the two adjacent rolls so that the tow band folds upon itself. The vertical component of the velocity is further reduced by the tendency of filaments to adhere intermittently and momentarily to the teeth, which can cause the band to pull off its centerline and/or to open. We have noted several problems with this type of piddler. Their use is often limited in practical operations to low speeds of less than 1000 m/min owing to the difficulty of moving such (large diameter) sunflower rolls at high revolutions; we have experienced increased incidence of wraps at higher speeds. In addition, for a given product, we have found that the operating range of this type of equipment can often be relatively narrow, especially with certain types of filaments. In many instances, we have found that a mesh between the rolls that is too loose will result in poor can lay and resultant tangles, while a mesh that is too tight will result in the tow line wrapping the sunflower rolls. Wraps have also frequently been caused by wear and chipping of any low friction coating applied to the tooth surfaces. The higher speed of the sunflower roll teeth relative to the fibers can also result in broken filaments, which in turn can lead to dark dyed sections in subsequent fiber or fabric processing. Sometimes maintaining tension between the sunflower rolls and previous rolls has also been difficult . The nature of this type of piddler requires that only a light force be imparted on the filaments by the faster moving sunflower rolls since it is not desired to stretch the filaments at this point and since the higher speeds and/or tighter roll mesh required to give more tension can also result in sunflower roll wraps. To summarize, various problems have been experienced in practical operation of the toothed roll systems that are available commercially and improvements are desirable, especially when processing certain specific types of filaments on such toothed roll piddler systems. Disclosures of using a pneumatic jet for depositing textile tows date back almost 50 years, e.g., Koster in U.S. Patent No. 2,447,982, Burns in U.S. Patent No. 2,971,243, King et al in U.S. Patent No. 3,706,407, and Goodner in U.S. Patent No. 3,387,756. All of the above prior suggestions for using a pneumatic (or aspirating) jet have required rotating mechanical parts and angling of a discharge tube away from the tow line's vertical inlet position, which require complex apparatus, often in relation to rotating air joints and seals, and their maintenance. We believe that such air jet piddlers are not being offered commercially now, although they had been suggested in the art and had been offered in earlier years, before gear piddlers became favored. Koster deposited his continuous filamentary material 2 in the form of a heaped coil or numerous staggered, partially over-lapping loops (col 1, lines 23-26) by passing his filamentary material with a stream of fluid through an outlet tube 1JL that had a bend at .12. (so that the lower portion was angled) and a second bend at .13 . so that discharge of the fluid caused rotation of tube l± (col 2, lines 1-34 and the drawing) . Burns referred to prior methods of blowing textile material through a tube revolving about an axis to deposit the textile material in the form of piled or over-lapping loops or coils and warned about difficulties caused by entanglement of filaments and obtaining "non-uniformly drawn sections" and so Burns' objective was to deposit his filaments without looped or entangled filaments so the filaments in his tow bundle would remain essentially parallel (col 1, lines 1-41). Burns used an air jet 5 that was rotated to discharge the tow at an angle in the form of a helical coil (e.g., col 2, especially lines 19-25 and Fig. 1) . Burns emphasized placing his air jet 5 . at the delivery end of his rotatably mounted apparatus and warned that attempts to operate with the jet in the vertical path of travel of the tow bundle had always led to excessive amount of entanglement (col 3, lines 58-67). Goodner is entitled "Pneumatic Jet Tow Piddler", requirements then being to propel heavy denier tows at high speeds while simultaneously laying (them) in coils, by spirally dispensing them into large containers or cans (col 1, lines 10-17) . Goodner used a rotatably mounted jet with a nozzle .22 . having a curved end to effect deposition in coils (e.g., col 2, lines 59-65 and Fig. 1) . King referred to Koster and Burns, and talked of the need for a rotating drive (as used by Burns, rather than Roster's technique) to avoid disruptive air currents that would disturb the more or less parallel relation of the filaments that was considered desirable and the need to avoid any fiber-catching joint (e.g., col 1, lines 22-58) . What is notable, in retrospect, was that the desire to avoid entanglement of the filaments was naturally associated in the minds of those skilled in the art with the desirability of preserving the essentially parallel relation of the filaments which seemed to them to mean that the tow bundle should be kept integral in separate coils, i.e., that filaments from one coil should not be allowed to intrude into another coil and entangle, which caused problems when the tow was later withdrawn from the can. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In contrast, according to the present invention, a single fixed jet with no moving parts may be positioned directly above the can into which the tow is piddled. This jet may be positioned vertically and requires no mechanical device or discharge tube to bend the tow line. Surprisingly, we have found advantages in that the emerging tow line has been able to enter the can softly in such a manner that entanglements are reduced and may be avoided completely when the tow is subsequently removed from the can. A tow can thus be pulled at speeds equal to and greater than those achievable earlier. We have, for instance, achieved speeds of 2000 mpm using our novel device, and we feel confident that much higher speeds could be achieved successfully. According to one aspect of the present invention, therefore, we provide an aspirating jet piddler 14 , comprising inlet tube 24 and outlet pipe 2 . 9, for passing a multifilamentary textile tow 1JL down therethrough in an axial direction, and outer housing 27. provided with an inlet port 2J3 for aspirating gas, said inlet tube .24 . and said outer housing .27 . providing therebetween an annular space , 28 . for passing said aspirating gas therethrough, whereby said aspirating gas is enabled to pull the tow 1JL down through and out of said inlet tube 24. and into said outlet pipe 2 . 9 and to discharge the tow out of said outlet pipe .29 . into a container .15 . , wherein said outlet pipe 2j9 is rigidly mounted and is not rotatable with respect to piddler 14. According to another aspect of the invention, we provide a process for depositing a multifilamentary textile tow gently into a container, comprising using an aspirating jet with no moving parts to forward the tow through said jet in a straight line path and to deposit the tow into the container. Also provided are other apparatus and process aspects, and products therefrom, as disclosed herein. The aspirating jet piddler according to the invention may be incorporated into a piddler system according to the prior art, such as one of the sunflower or gear piddlers that are commercially available, but is preferably substituted as a replacement for a commercially available system. Placement of the tow may be into any of several can and laydown configurations. Typical laydown systems, all of which are applicable to the present invention, include those that move a can and/or the jet in both X and Y directions, those in which a can rotates, those where a cylindrical, motionless can is used, those in which a round can both rotates and traverses, those in which a piddler head traverses while the can spins and other possible configurations . This novel piddler facilitates by simplifying machine design and allows for even deposition of a rapidly moving tow into a can in such a way that a large quantity can be placed in a can and thus reduce down time, e.g., in a subsequent processing step. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a schematic illustration in elevation of one embodiment of the invention, in combination with a sunflower roll piddler system. Figure 2 illustrates similarly an embodiment of the invention as part of a preferred piddler system without the sunflower roll. Figure 3 is a schematic view in elevation and in section of a preferred embodiment of the invention. Figure 4 is a similar plan view from above of the embodiment of Figure 3. DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Referring to the drawings, Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the jet piddler which is shown generally as 14 in Figures 1 and 2. In Figure 1, the jet piddler is shown in combination with "Sunflower rolls" 13 of a commercial piddler unit. In this unit, a moving tow line 1JL is pulled by rolls .12 . from a spinning machine (not shown) . Sunflower rolls JL3 pull the tow line 11 from rolls 12.. Thus far, Figure 1 follows practice in a conventional commercial piddler system. Then, according to the invention, our stationary piddler jet 14 pulls the tow line .11 from the sunflower rolls 13 and deposits it into a container .15 . . In Figure 2, the jet piddler .14, is shown in a preferred embodiment where a tow line L is pulled from a spinning machine by a set of rolls .12 . from which it is pulled by the stationary piddler jet 14. and deposited into container 15. In Figures 3 and 4, the tow line L enters the jet via inlet tube .24., and emerges from outlet pipe (a tailpipe) 2 , shown in Figure 3, outlet pipe .29 . being a continuation of an outer housing 2J7- The stationary piddler jet itself comprises also a straight-in air inlet port 2J3 . , which directs air or other aspirating fluid into outer housing . 27 . in a direction perpendicular to the tow line path 3L, and preferably a vortexing air inlet port . 22 ./ which directs air in a direction tangential to the tow line path .11.. Both ports are connected to a source or sources of pressurized gas, typically air, typically in a range of 25 to 100 psig (2.75 to 8 atmospheres), these sources not being shown. The air enters outer housing . 27 . which is sealed by cover plate 2 . 6, and is forced to leave the housing 21_ through annular space 3 between the inlet tube 24. and the outlet pipe 2 . 9, being a continuation of outer housing 2_7. The motive force of the air may be controlled by the relationship between inlet tube 24 and outlet pipe .29 . which creates the annular space 28 and may be adjusted by raising or lowering inlet tube 24 which may be externally threaded, e.g., to the cover plate .26 . , and may be secured in place, e.g., by lock nut . 25 . • The air inlets are conveniently located so that the straight-in air from port . 23 . travels through the annular space in a direction essentially parallel to that of the moving tow line 11., whereas any vortexing air will swirl or spiral through the annular space in a direction roughly tangential to that of the tow line 1L and similarly through the outlet pipe 29. The entrained tow line L is thus pulled downward through the jet and a swirling force may be created by any vortexing air which may cause the filaments also to swirl spirally (in a circular pattern) as they are discharged from the jet through outlet pipe 23 . The amount of any spiral provided may be controlled by regulating via an external valve (not shown) the amount of vortexing air allowed to enter the jet housing 27 via port 2J2. The ability to use vortexing air provides flexibility as a means to adjust the air pressure when piddling different tow lines with varying characteristics . It will be noted that this novel air jet piddler has no moving parts, which is an important practical advantage, both for simplicity of manufacture, and in practical operation and maintenance. EXAMPLES The invention is further described in the following Examples, which include comparative data to demonstrate advantages achieved by the use of the present invention; all parts and percentages are by weight . COMPARISON A A tow of polyester filaments was processed according to the prior art, utilizing a gear piddler (such as commercially available from IWKA, Karlesruhe, Germany) to pull a multifilamentary tow in the form of a band of unoriented as-spun filaments from a spinning apparatus and to deposit said tow in a can. The polyester filaments were bicomponent filaments prepared essentially as described in U.S. Patent No. 5,458,971, the combined polymer throughput being 182 lbs. per hr. (82.6 Kg/Hr.), and the ratio of polymer A to polymer B was 78:22. At speeds above 600 ypm (549 m/min) slippage on the piddler rolls was observed, and was so severe that run times were limited to 30 minutes or less before the multifilamentary band would wrap one of the rolls and force a complete machine shutdown. EXAMPLE 1 To overcome this problem experienced in Comparison A, a stationary air jet was added according to an embodiment of the invention below the nip of the piddler' s gear rolls, essentially as illustrated in Figure 1. This stationary air jet is designed so that air enters the jet housing from two locations. The first air inlet port is situated such that the air directly impinges on the tube surrounding the filaments and thus flows out of the jet past the tube's tip in a direction parallel to and entraining the filaments. The second air inlet is situated such that the air enters in a direction that is tangential to the direction of flow of the filaments. This causes a vortexing effect on the entrained filaments and we noted that they were caused to spiral as they left the jet's tailpiece. The suction power of the jet can be controlled by regulating the air pressure and flow. In addition, by regulating the ratio of the vortexing air to the other air, the amount of spiral imparted on the rope band can be controlled. With the jet described above, similar tow processed as described for Comparison A was spun and piddled into the container satisfactorily at more than twice the maximum speed achieved in Comparison A, i.e. at speeds up to 1360 ypm (1244 mpm) . Tension throughout the piddler was good and there was no tendency to wrap the rolls when this piddler was used according to the invention. EXAMPLE 2 A comparative test was run with tow processed essentially as described in Example 1 at a speed of 500 ypm (457 mpm) , and the resulting tow was then withdrawn from the container and processed through a draw machine equipped with a device that detects knotted rope before it enters the draw machine's feed section. The machine's logic controls will then shut the machine down to prevent a knot from damaging the equipment . Tangles and knots were recorded for the product produced according to the present invention and compared to historical data over a six month period on the same product produced previously without using the stationary air jet according to the invention (i.e., essentially as described for Comparison A) at 500 ypm. TABLE 1 As can be seen, use of the stationary air jet according to the invention reduced the number of tangles during extraction from the can to about 60% of the number recorded as experienced previously. The appearance of the filaments in the containers as produced in Examples 1 and 2 was similar to that described hereinafter, after Example 3, and quite unlike the appearance of tow piddled using commercial gear piddlers, as described in Comparison A or Comparison B. COMPARISON B A tow of polyester filaments was processed according to the prior art, utilizing a Neumag gear piddler to pull a multifilamentary tow in the form of a band of unoriented as-spun filaments from a spinning apparatus and to deposit said tow in a can. The polyester filaments were polyethylene terephthalate of 20.5 LRV prepared using a conventional polyester polymerization unit. The molten polymer stream was extruded at each position at a rate of 63 kg/hr through a spinneret containing 2600 holes and cooled using a stream of gas below the spin cell to form solid round fibers. The resulting bundle of filaments was combined with similar bundles from another 63 positions and the resulting tow was deposited into a container at a maximum speed of 1450 mpm using the gear piddler. Tows were withdrawn from several containers and were combined to form a rope bundle and drawn using conventional polyester methods to produce a 1.2 dpf fiber having a 6.4 gm/den tenacity. Gear piddler operation in this Comparison B had to be limited to 1450 mpm since excessive piddler wraps (greater than one per 8 hr. shift) resulted when attempts were made to use higher spin speeds. A liquid loading of 20% by weight in spinning was required to attain product removal from the containers for the subsequent drawing operation. At lower liquid loading, knots and tangles were excessive when attempts were made to withdraw such tows piddled according to Comparison B. EXAMPLE 3 To overcome the problems experienced in Comparison B, the gear piddler was replaced with a stationary air jet according to the embodiment of the invention essentially as illustrated in Figures 2, 3 and 4 and as described in Example 1. The entrained filaments were drawn through the jet outlet pipe 23_ and entered an extended stationary tailpipe which directed the filaments toward the can. The tailpipe in effect extended the length of the outlet pipe and brought the filaments closer to the can, which was located farther from the air jet than in Example 1. Practically no swirling of the filaments was noticed in this Example 3. Even without the swirling action noted in Example 1, however, as the air was discharged from the tailpipe, it tended to expand and cause filaments to balloon outwards. This ballooning in effect enabled the filaments to float down and land softly and the filaments did not become entangled in the piddler can, as shown by the fact that the tow could be removed satisfactorily. Using this jet instead of the gear piddler, a tow similar to that described for Comparison B was spun at speeds up to 1980 mpm with a spinning cell thruput of 83 kg/hr/pos . Tension of the spinning threadline was good and there was practically no tendency to wrap the piddler rolls when this jet piddler was used according to the invention. Piddler wraps were reduced to less than one per month. In this Example, using the piddler jet according to the invention, the liquid loading in spinning was reduced from 20% to 5% without hindering satisfactory removal of the product from the containers. No knots or tangles were encountered during product removal . In addition the jet permitted direct laydown of the as-spun tow into a square can (vs orbital laydown into a round can) . Square or rectangular cans provide more effective use of space in the plant and while transporting tow. Such more effective use can provide over 25% improvement in efficiency. Furthermore, such larger containers can provide for a more than 24 hour creelstock change cycle with resultant 6% improvement in machine utilization and 66% reduction in yield loss for can heels . It will be noted that significant advantages were obtained by using the jet piddler according to the invention in Example 3 instead of one of the commercially-available gear piddlers that have been preferred for commercial operations, as follows: 1 - higher operational speed - 1980 mpm for Example 3 vs. 1450 mpm for Comparison B, i.e., about one third faster - this increase in piddling speed is more significant than merely providing better productivity in piddling, as the maximum speed obtainable hitherto by commercially-available piddlers has limited spinning speeds, which could have been much higher but have been limited, in practice, by a bottleneck of maximum practical piddling speed. Higher spinning speeds can also provide different properties in the resulting as-spun filaments, and thereby have far-reaching effects downstream. We are confident that much higher speeds could be achieved, the limitation in Example 3 being because of limitations in the speeds that the rolls could be operated at, rather than any limitation relating to the air jet. 2 - less tangling and knots - the inability to improve piddling speed without excessive tangling and knots when subsequently withdrawing a tow has been an important factor previously - a surprising result of the present invention in this regard is discussed separately hereinafter. 3 - lower liquid loading - only 5% in Example 3 vs a minimum of 20% in Comparison B to get the maximum speed obtainable in Comparison B. "Liquid loading" is the weight of liquid (spin finish and possibly extra water) as a percentage of the weight of fiber. Higher liquid loadings have typically helped reduce knots and tangles produced by a gear piddler by causing the tow to act as a large cohesive rope that is less likely to knot upon itself. In addition, the liquid adds weight to the tow so that, if a weak knot does form, it is more likely to fall out as the tow is pulled up out of the can. Further, some operators have added more water as an overlay, in addition to the liquid loading of the tow that passes through the gear piddler, e.g., at a rate of about 1 gallon/minute, to help compact down the coils of tow in the can. Although such high liquid loadings have been used to increase the speeds possible using prior art commercially-available gear piddlers, they increase cost by requiring more liquid (spin finish) to be added and also cause problems subsequently, e.g., during drawing. 4 - fewer roll wraps - less than 1 per month for Example 3 vs Comparison B, in which the maximum speed was limited by the requirement for less than 1 per 8 hr shift. 5 - higher throughput - 83 kg/hr in Example 3 vs 63 kg/hr in Comparison B. 6 - square containers in Example 3 vs round cans in Comparison B - square or rectangular containers can provide more efficient use of space vs round cans which have been conventional because commercially-available piddlers have historically distributed the piddled tow in a pattern that favors a rounded cross-section - the surprising advantage obtained thereby has been noted at the end of Example 3. What has been even more surprising to us has been the difference in the nature of the filamentary material produced in the containers according to the invention in contrast to the coils of tow piddled according to the prior art . As has been noted in the Background and in relation to "liquid loading", hereinabove, the important objective of avoiding entanglement or knots when withdrawing a piddled tow from a container was naturally associated with maintaining a cohesive and integral filamentary bundle during laying of the bundle into the container. The ballooning outwards and floating of the filaments that we have described in Example 3 is the exact opposite of what has hitherto been considered desirable (maintaining a cohesive and integral filament bundle that is laid into the container as such) . To all appearances, the outwardly ballooning filaments discharged from the piddler according to the invention and the apparently random mass of filaments laid in the container seem to be distributed in a way that has appeared undesirable for withdrawing the container without knots and tangles to those skilled in the art, such as ourselves, who have been used to ensuring laying a cohesive and integral rope bundle so as to avoid entanglement upon subsequently withdrawing the tow. Indeed, operators should be warned not to drop the end of the tow or filaments therefrom into the container when a container has been filled and the tow is cut and introduced into another container, as it has proved hard to find the end (after it has been dropped into a container) of such tows as we have piddled because of the lack of bundle integrity of our tows in contrast to prior art tows. Nevertheless, provided the cut end is properly secured, as can be seen from the results in the Examples above, it has proved possible to withdraw the product tows of our invention from containers with less tangles or knots than when using commercially-available gear piddlers.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. An aspirating jet piddler 4, comprising inlet tube .24. and outlet pipe 2_9_, for passing a multifilamentary textile tow L down therethrough in an axial direction, and outer housing 27 provided with an inlet port .23 . for aspirating gas, said inlet tube 24 and said outer housing 2J7 providing therebetween an annular space ϋ for passing said aspirating gas therethrough, whereby said aspirating gas fluid is enabled to pull the tow 1J. down through and out of said inlet tube 24. and into said outlet pipe J29. and to discharge the tow out of said outlet pipe 2_9_ into a container .15., wherein said outlet pipe 29_ is rigidly mounted and is not rotatable with respect to piddler 14.- 2. A process for depositing a multifilamentary textile tow gently into a container, comprising using an aspirating jet with no moving parts to forward the tow through said jet in a straight line path and to deposit the tow into the container.

Inventors: ANDERSON FRANK WILLIAM, HARTZOG JAMES VICTOR, QUINN DARREN SCOTT, ANDERSON, FRANK, WILLIAM, HARTZOG, JAMES, VICTOR, QUINN, DARREN, SCOTT
Applicants: ANDERSON FRANK WILLIAM, DU PONT, HARTZOG JAMES VICTOR, QUINN DARREN SCOTT, ANDERSON, FRANK, WILLIAM, E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, HARTZOG, JAMES, VICTOR, QUINN, DARREN, SCOTT
Application year: 1998
Main classification: B65H54
IPC codes: B65H51, B65H54