WINDMILL ROTOR AND WIND BLADES THEREFOR

Abstract: With conventional windmills the wing blades used have a certain resilient flexability which, in connection with "front runners", implies that the wings in strong wind are bent inwardly towards the mill tower, i.e. the wing rotor should be placed with a required safety spacing from the mill tower. An associated forward displacement of the entire rotor involves high costs and has already been avoided in various unsuccessful manners. The invention provides for an improved solution of the problem in disclosing that the wing blades, per se, are designated with such a forwardly curved configuration that the wing tips, when the wings are mounted in a conventional manner on the wing hub, will be located with increased spacing from the side of the tower.

Description: Windmill rotor .and wing blades therefor The present invention concerns a windmill with a rotor of the usual type which is normally configured with three blades extending from a blade hub on the main shaft of the windmill housing. The mill housing is disposed in a rotatable manner on the top of the mill tower, and with so-called front- runners the system is arranged so that the rotation of the mill housing is controlled to maintain the blade rotor facing towards the wind, i.e. so that the wind first hits the rotor and thereafter the tower. The windmill blades are predominantly configured as steel constructions where efforts are made to keep these both as light and as rigid as practically possible, the result being a compromise in that the blades are provided with considerable rigidity, but at the same time also a certain elastic resilience which will naturally manifest itself with blades of greater lengths, e.g. 15-30m. The wind pressure in against the blade rotor, where the blades turn their broad sides against the wind, will thus give rise to an elastic rearwards flexing of the blades. With rotating blades, this situation is alleviated to a considerable degree by two different circumstances, i.e. partly that the centrifugal force which simultaneously arises on the blades seeks to straighten out the blades, and partly that the blades, as a consequence of their movement transversely to the wind, are influenced by a wind direction which is not facing directly in towards the broad surface of the blades. However, there will still arise a wind component which seeks to force the blades rearwards . The consequence of this related, elastic flexing rearwards by the blades, is that during their movement past the tower, the stronger the wind the closer the outer ends of the blades will come to the tower. Since the windmills shall preferably also be able to function effectively in strong winds, it is thus necessary for the blade rotor, seen in the direction of the mill housing's main shaft, to be positioned so far forwards that the blades, during their rotation, at no time can be exposed to influence by the wind to such a degree that they make contact with the tower with associated risk of serious accidents or direct damage. Various items of security equipment can be used for the braking of the rotor in strong winds, but in such cases it must be taken into consideration that the more the rotor is braked, the more the effective wind pressure against the blades' broad sides is increased to a considerable degree. The problem could naturally be solved by the blade rotor being positioned at great distance from the mill tower, but for many reasons this is a very expensive solution. Consequently, attention is focused on the stiffness of the blades, precisely so that these can withstand a high wind pressure without the blade hub having to be disposed at some exaggerated distance from the vertical axis of the tower. The blades are traditionally constructed as aerodynamic shell profile elements with a long, straight main beam extending out along the blade at its thickest area. This main beam is in itself particularly rigid precisely in the direction which is relevant here, which will be in the direction of the beam's height, but on the basis discussed there can be reason to undertake closer considerations with regard to the relevant flexibility of the beam, i.e. with regard to extra stiffening. Two different methods have hitherto been suggested for the solving of the problem, though without either of these having made the provision that the main beam should be stiffened, i.e. firstly that the blade rotor is placed on a main shaft which slopes slightly upwards, and secondly that the blades are mounted in a forwardly-inclined manner, which so- lutions can be briefly commented on as follows: When use is made of an upwardly-sloping main shaft, the whole of the rotor plane is tipped upwards/rearwards, so that in their rotational movement in the space above the tower, the blades can freely swing in over the contour of the under- lying tower, while the passage of the blades below will take place at increased distance from the tower. The mill can thus operate with a considerable free distance between the tips of the blades and the side of the tower, even though the blade μ- _ rt HI rt 0 Ω ι_ι. CQ 0 μ- rt tr Ω $, 3 tr rt μ- 0 rt TJ ØJ CQ rt φ H- rt 3 μ- CQ CQ rt tr ti tr tr μ- μ- ri 0 Φ c ts CQ tr ØJ 0J tr 0 Φ tr ti ts μ- tr φ tr 3 CQ μ- Φ ts øJ Ξ rt tr C LQ μ- Φ Ω Ω Pi ti Ω μ- Ω μ- H φ LQ 0 ØJ 0 φ 0 <! ii ii μ- ii Φ tr LQ ø ) ø ) Φ Ω rt rt rt φ CQ Φ 0J μ- s rt ts ti <! Hi rt ii Φ Φ ii P. ts 0 Hi tr Ω rt I— 1 u Φ s; μ- μ- tr X TJ Φ Ω H - tr - φ φ μ] £ μ- øJ h- ■ φ ≤ 0. LQ ti tr μ- (3 1 0 μ- i-S tr O t! Φ TJ CQ £ 0 tr Φ - tr rt μ- 0 rt ØJ ^ μ- LQ CQ μ, φ ts 0 TJ rt ts μ- ti LQ Φ 0 μ- 0 ) rt l μ- H tr μ- Φ 0 ti ti tr φ ØJ rt Ω Hi 0J rt Pi CQ ti O Φ -> CQ tr ti rt ti tr φ 0 tr • rt μ- SOi ØJ φ CQ rt rt tr 0 i H Pi TJ tr LQ rt 0J P. φ ø ) μ- 1 CQ C tr Φ Φ < rt rt Φ tr • CQ tr ti rt tr μ- 3 Φ Φ Φ 0 Φ Φ H rt P 0 l-h 3 ØJ μ- rt 0 Φ Φ øJ 0J Φ φ ØJ ØJ TJ tr μ- 0 rr TJ Φ 0J CQ CQ H tr φ tr s- rt H TJ Pi <! μ- (3 tr tr CQ P rt Φ Pi ^ • 3 < 0 φ μ- φ ω t tr ii μ- Ω Ω 0J ^ rt μ- tr 0 Φ φ φ 0 rt ØJ CQ μ- øJ φ rt Φ Φ s. ti -> rt μ- Φ 0 tr rt Ω rt rt ø ) rt φ 3 0J ti <i 0J tr 0 Ω tr 0J ≤ φ LQ μ- Ω rt CQ ft Hi ØJ Φ μ- 0 u μ- $. μ- tr H H tr rt tr Φ Pi CQ Φ t tr tr Φ CQ tr ØJ ØJ i 0 ) 0 Ω 0 0 Φ ■-i 0 ts < 0 rt μ- ts Φ rt 0J c 0 μ- Φ - φ tr H S3 ^ CQ Φ TJ LQ LQ ØJ ti ØJ rt P 0 ts Ω μ- ti tr rt ØJ tr ti tr CQ H 0 Φ ft ØJ tr C i T 3 φ μ- a rt K ^ tr CQ ≤ Φ Φ ti Φ tr ø ) μ- Φ Ω •> øJ Φ tr rt H tr tr !— ' ØJ 3 Φ h-> μ- øJ 3 Ω μ- tr ii Φ SOi LQ 0 HI CQ Φ ri H tr 0 μ- rt • ! Φ CQ rt H φ μ- CQ ti Φ ØJ rt ^ Φ ØJ μ- P ≤ ti l-h S3 " rt TJ c 3 ØJ Ii Φ < ≤ TJ ^ 0 tr φ ØJ Φ Pi ti μ- t ti rt φ μ- 3 μ- CQ tr μ- μ. ØJ o 0 ti 0J Φ ω rt 0J ØJ CQ Φ rt • O <! LQ 0 Hi 0 t! 3 rt Φ Φ Ω rt μ- Hi P. ti 0J Ω <J μ- tr Pi CQ rt TS rt ØJ rt tr ti Φ φ 0 Ξ 1— ' I— 1 ϋ Q 0J tr rr tr CQ ts LQ rt O Φ μ- ω ØJ Φ 1— ' - tr s; Pi tr CQ H φ ii 3 <i Φ Φ Φ μ- φ 0 μ- C Φ rt rt 0 ) rt Φ μ- μ ts rt rt CQ μ- rt ØJ Ω o μ- μ- Φ C rt Ω μ- rt Φ φ ϋ Ω rt rt ti Hi ti H μ. H 0 <! - ø j Ω LQ tr Ω 0 S3 " rt ti i ØJ ts μ- ti ii rt tr 0 tr tr <i Φ 0 0 Ω rt Φ μ- ØJ ti rt H tr Φ Φ ti LQ tr LQ Ω ii μ- S3 " Ω rt μ- C H Φ tr CQ φ ω ti Hi 0 5 > tr Pi ØJ Ω tr μ- rt ^ φ tr 0 0 CQ CQ μ- 0J - μ- Φ 0 CQ Φ 0J 0J ti 0 rt LQ t tr Φ ^ μ- 3 tr Φ φ tr = ω Φ ti C Φ rt rt < ti CQ ØJ P. μ- rt Hi μ- < μ- μ- ti TJ I— ' Φ *< μ- rt ØJ Hi α ti 7s CQ rt . Φ CQ Φ rt 3 φ P μ- Hι Ω μ- Ω Ω CQ Ω LQ μ- ■ 0J Hi tr P. μ- P Hi tr μ- Hi μ- ti Hi Φ tr t! ≤ CQ μ- CQ CQ 0 0J Hi 0 ) φ ØJ tr 0 Φ H Hι O Φ Pi Φ rt μ- 0 0 0J Φ ≤ μ- CQ Hl ^ ~ = ti Φ CQ ≤; μ- CQ $. Φ 0 ØJ 0J 0 CQ H Ω μ- ti ≤ μ. l-h ti rt tr t Hi CQ tr ti Φ Ω LQ rt H- TJ 3 H S3 " 3 tr CQ rt o LQ ti Pi ϋ tr μ- LQ Ω ts £ 0 ) rt rt μ- 0 tr 0J tr rt 0 μ. Φ Ω s; ti Ω ØJ i— ■ Φ ts 0J 0J 0 0 φ μ- ti H tr 0J ti rt Hi ts rt tr CQ 0 rt 0 ØJ 0 tr rt ØJ Ω 0 rt rt ts 3 μ- rt S3 Φ Hi O CQ rt P. 0 ) Φ LQ tr ØJ - CQ rt tr tr t ι-f rt μ- Pi 0 ti ti tr tr TJ rt 0 LQ H CQ CQ tr μ- H Φ ØJ 0J Pi tr rt μ- 0 Φ μ- Pi μ- 0 Φ ts ØJ Φ ØJ μ- φ ii tr 0J Φ Φ 0 c LQ Φ 0 rt Φ φ Φ rt tr tr H tr Ω 0 ts ti ω Pi rt 3 rt 3 0 ) tr tr Φ 0 c CQ tr H Hi CQ μ- tr Φ μ- CQ ØJ ^ ts Ω tr φ CQ 3 ii SJJ TJ rt 0 rt Hi rt φ rt μ- O rt rt H 0J t φ H tr Ω μ- ii CQ Φ Pi φ rt φ CQ CQ tr < = 0 O CQ rt ft tr tr 0 Pi Ω 3 μ- 0 ØJ 0J μ- "< μ- tι 0 0 ti tr Pi 0J Φ Φ Hi rt ti tr O tr Φ Φ rt H μ- rt rt Hi ti CQ ti ti rt α tr CQ Φ μ- LQ tr t * rt tr Φ Φ tr μ- H Φ rt 0 Φ μ- φ μ- øJ rt S3 Ω tr Φ rt ø ) Φ Φ μ- ii ø ) φ Φ Φ rt rt tr φ Ω μ- Φ ti μ- μ- H Pi ts 0 ) r- • Φ rt tr H Φ Pi tr rt rt tr i tr Φ rt ti Φ 0J tr tr φ CQ Φ ti 0J rt H CQ ts Ω φ CQ CQ μ- o Φ Hi μ- Φ Φ μ- 0J φ Φ φ ti £ ii Φ Φ Φ CQ LQ 3 H 0 ØJ <! 0J IP rt Pi 0 rt ti Hi 0J ti CQ H 0 rt φ Φ i μ- Φ ^ rt CQ CQ 0 rt μ- φ μ- tr ti 0 0 ^Q CQ Ω Φ μ- Φ Hi μ- ti φ μ- X Ω øJ 0J rt 0 tr 0J 3 Pi ØJ Pi ts <! ØJ H ≤ Hi rt μ- Φ P 3 rt 0 ti CQ (3 μ- O CQ Pi ≤ 0 ≤ Φ H ø) μ- C rt rt Ω Φ rt Φ tr Φ μ- tr rr • » TJ øJ ti 0 μ- rt ra ti h- 1 Ω Φ μ- ≤ Φ 0J μ- CQ Ω μ- 3 μ- H CQ rt Φ H tr ti Φ (3 μ- s: rt S3 " ti φ μ- rt ω > < Φ tr Hi Φ ii 3 Φ φ t ØJ 0 μ- øJ 0J μ- • Φ ø) H CQ *< ti ØJ tr rt ti CQ μ- ii φ :— ' μ. CQ ^ 0 Pi LQ μ- ti rt H μ- ti μ- rt 3 rt rt 0 μ- H Φ rt o H- Pi c rt Φ • μ- 3 ti Φ μ- CQ ts LQ w ti tr μ- Φ - ti Pi μ- tr (3 CQ ØJ φ ts ØJ μ- Ω 0 Φ μ- CQ ti μ- rt μ- CQ H CQ 0 H- 0 LQ Φ P Ω rt H LQ CQ < ti μ- LQ ØJ ii ØJ μ- ti rt tr < ti TJ CQ rt tr ti tr tr μ- φ ts rt 5 > 0J tr 0J Φ Φ CQ tr rt P. ØJ rt t Ω Φ <! Φ Φ rt rt Φ φ 0 ØJ rt LQ tr φ TJ < 0J ts ØJ SOi TJ Pi i P- μ- φ rt rt φ μ- t rt Ω Φ Φ ØJ ØJ (3 • rt tr ØJ < M Φ rt rt rt μ- ØJ μ- rt Hi μ- O φ H- μ. P μ- 0 tr (3 ØJ 3 3 0 Φ TJ rt φ Φ n 0 0J ø i H μ- μ- ti ti TJ 0 øJ ti ϋ c ≤ øJ 0 <! Pi 0J μ. CQ rt ! » 0J I— ' μ- rt rt φ Ω φ ti Ω rt Φ Φ CQ μ- rt 0J μ- Pi φ μ- 0 K H μ- - CQ μ- Φ CQ ts 1 CQ Ω ø ) μ- 0 1 tr øJ rt rt 0 ti μ- H ti tr tr Φ rt rt φ 1 μ, 0 1 P rt Hi μ- ii tr 1 l-h 1 Φ 1 1 *< CQ P 1 rt rt 1 The blades in themselves will thus be able to appear as a right-angled extension out from the blade hub, which can more or less gradually go over into a curved extension, e.g. merely along the outer third of the blade, so that the blade tips stand at a greater distance from the tower. A rotor with blades shaped in this way has proved not only to be more effective for the considered objective, but also aesthetically acceptable, in that visually the curving outwards manifests itself very little. For example, it will be quite an attrac- tive result if the blade hub can be placed a half a metre closer to the tower shaft, and an associated outwards curvature of a blade with a length in the order of 25m will be only slightly visible, namely when the inner, thicker length parts can be seen to work in a plane which appears natural to the observer. Compared to blades with the said negative coning, the blades according to the invention will distinguish themselves partly in that the rotor hub can be built in a conventional manner, and partly that the hub will be not influenced by substantial bending forces originating from the effect of centrifugal force on the blades. With coned blades, a great part of the straightening-out of the blades will be due precisely to the centrifugal force, so that they must be extra coned in order also to accommodate the rearwards deflection which occurs under wind pressure. Compared with the said tilted rotors, the invention offers the advantage that the blades are influenced in a uniform manner all the way around, in quite the same way as with conventional rotors, while the blades in a tilted rotor are influenced unevenly, i.e. all depending on whether they are moving upwards or downwards, and are consequently herewith moving respectively with and against the wind, which corresponds to a yawing-error which can give rise to various problems . As mentioned above, it is characteristic of a blade according to the invention that the main beam itself is partly formed with a curvature in the high-edge plane, but it must be emphasized, however, that the invention is not limited to this, in that by formation in a suitably shaped mould the blade can be given the desired curvature also with wholly or partly beam-free box constructions. The invention will now be described in more detail with reference to the drawing, in which Fig. 1 shows a windmill with a blade rotor according to the invention seen from the side, Fig. 2 shows a windmill blade seen from the front, and Fig. 3 shows the blade in Fig. 2 seen from the side edge. The windmill shown in Fig. 1 consists in the normal manner of a tower 2, a mill housing 4 and a main shaft 6 with rotor hub 8 for blades 10 which constitutes a blade rotor. The mill is a "front-runner", where the rotor turns forwards towards the wind W, which means that the wind pressure will bend the blades backwards and herewith inwards towards the tower 2. Therefore, the system 4,6 must be disposed in such a manner that the necessary safety distance must exist between the blades 10 and the tower. With the invention, this distance can be minimized by the blades being provided with a forwardly-directed curvature, preferably only over an outer extent 12, whereby the tips of the blades, when at rest, will stand at some distance (a) in front of the plane p which is formed by the blade axes at the root parts of the blades. The blades can hereby be constructed so that also in strong winds they will lie at a safe distance outside the tower, possibly curving slightly rearwards towards . In Fig. 2 and 3 is shown an authentic configuration of a windmill blade with a length of 29m. The outwards curvature of the tip shown in Fig. 3 amounts to approximately 50cm, but this may well be somewhat larger or somewhat smaller. However, it is preferable that the curvature is not much greater than the radius of the blade root, since this can give rise to certain difficulties in the transport of the blade. The invention does not prescribe in detail the conditions for how and with what curvature the curvature should be produced, in that this must be determined on a professional level while paying regard to the blade construction in general. Consequently, it shall not be excluded that it can be chosen to place the curvature almost as a bend in the thick end part of the blade, with the outer part of the blade ex- tending straight or slightly curved. It must be mentioned that in the claims it has been chosen to relate the invention to the said coned rotors as known technique, and that it has hereby been found expedient to refer to the blade axes p as centre of the normally cylindri- cal-shaped blade root parts where these are secured to the blade hub or at their transition area to the hub.

Claims: C L A I M S 1. Windmill rotor of the kind where the windmill blades extend outwards from a securing or transition area at a rotor hub to a tip area which lies at a distance in front of the normal plane of the rotor hub through the blade axes' intersection points with the hub circumference, c h a r a c- t e r i z e d in that the blades extend outwards from the hub in said normal plane, and at a distance from the hub then ex- tend in an outwardly/forwardly, curving manner. 2. Windmill blade for a rotor according to claim 1, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that in the free condition the blade extends in a forwardly-curved manner in the transverse plane of the blade over a length at a distance from the blade root. 3. Windmill blade according to claim 2, c h a r a c- t e r i z e d in that the curvature results in a forwards disposition of the blade tip of a magnitude corresponding to the radius of the root part of the blade.

Inventors: ALBERTSEN HENRIK, ANDERSEN SOEREN, GRABAU PETER, ALBERTSEN, HENRIK, ANDERSEN, SOEREN, GRABAU, PETER
Applicants: ALBERTSEN HENRIK, ANDERSEN SOEREN, GRABAU PETER, LM GLASFIBER AS, ALBERTSEN, HENRIK, ANDERSEN, SOEREN, GRABAU, PETER, LM GLASFIBER A/S
Application year: 1998
Main classification: F03D1
IPC codes: F03D1