Echo canceller for use in a communications system

Abstract: In an echo canceller, a first adaptive filter circuit (11, 12) calculates first tap coefficients (H1) using a first convergence coefficient (µ1), and generates a first pseudo echo signal (HX1), and a first subtracter (13) subtracts the first pseudo echo signal from a transmitting signal to generate a first error signal (E1). A second adaptive filter circuit (14,15) calculates second tap coefficients (H2) using a second convergence coefficient (µ2), and generates a second pseudo echo signal (HX2), and a second subtracter (16) subtracts the second pseudo echo signal from the transmitted signal to generate a second error signal (E2). A control circuit (21,22) selects one set of the first tap coefficients and the second tap coefficients in accordance with a received signal (X), the transmitted signal, and the first and second error signals. A third adaptive filter circuit (17,18,19) generates a third pseudo echo signal (HX3) in accordance with the set of tap coefficients selected by the control circuit and the received signal, and a third subtracter (16) subtracts the third pseudo echo signal from the transmitted signal to generate a third error signal (E3).

Description: The present invention relates to an echo canceller which is suitable for use in minimising echoes that might appear at an end of a transmission line of a telecommunication system over which speakers at opposite ends of the line are able to talk to each other. In a previously proposed echo canceller, there are a single adaptive filter circuit and a single subtracter. In the adaptive filter circuit, tap coefficients are calculated in accordance with an error signal and a received signal, and a pseudo echo signal is generated in accordance with the tap coefficients and the received signal. Also, the subtracter subtracts the pseudo echo signal from a transmitting signal, thus cancelling echoes in the transmitting signal. In the previously proposed echo canceller, however, when the background noise is large at the end of a line, or when it is impossible to determine whether the line is for a 2-wire system or a 4-wire system, the characteristics for detecting double-talk are degraded, and the characteristics of the tap coefficients are not stable. This will be explained later in detail. It is a feature of an echo canceller to be described below, by way of example in illustration of the present invention that it is able stably to provide excellent tap coefficient characteristics without degrading the double-talk detection characteristics, even when the background noise is large at the end of the line, or when it is impossible to determine if the line is for a 2-wire system or a 4-wire system. EP-A-0 508 847 discloses an echo canceller including a first adaptive filter circuit, a first subtracter connected to the first adaptive filter circuit, a second adaptive filter circuit, a second subtracter connected to the second adaptive filter circuit, a control circuit connected to the first and second adaptive filter circuits and first and second subtracters, a third adaptive filter circuit connected to the control circuit, and a third subtracter connected to the third adaptive filter circuit, and wherein the first and second subtracter circuits are arranged for receiving residual signals to detect echos. DE 195 06 324 discloses an arrangement having a first subtracter arranged for receiving a transmitted signal. In a particular echo canceller to be described below, by way of example in illustration of the present invention, a first adaptive filter circuit calculates first tap coefficients using a first convergence coefficient, and generates a first pseudo echo signal, and a first subtracter subtracts the first pseudo echo signal from a transmitting signal to generate a first error signal. A second adaptive filter circuit calculates second tap coefficients using a second convergence coefficient, and generates a second pseudo echo signal, and a second subtracter subtracts the second pseudo echo signal from the transmitting signal to generate a second error signal. A control circuit selects one set of the first tap coefficients and the second tap coefficients in accordance with a received signal, the transmitting signal, and the first and second error signals. A third adaptive filter circuit generates a third pseudo echo signal in accordance with the setting of the tap coefficients selected by the control circuit and the received signal, and a third subtracter subtracts the third pseudo echo signal from the transmitting signal to generate a third error signal serving as an actual transmission signal. In this echo canceller, the first and second filter circuits are constantly operating to provide an estimate for the tap coefficients, regardless of the operation of the control circuit. The following description and drawings disclose previously proposed arrangements and, by means of an example, the invention which is characterised in the appended claims, whose terms determine the extent of the protection conferred hereby. In the drawings: Fig. 1 is a block schematic circuit diagram of a previously proposed echo canceller, Fig. 2 is a flowchart for use in describing the operation of an adaptive filter control circuit shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 3 is a block schematic circuit diagram of another previously proposed echo canceller, Fig. 4 is a flowchart for use in describing the operation of the adaptive filter control circuit shown in Fig. 3, Fig. 5 is a block schematic circuit diagram of an echo canceller which is illustrative of the present invention, and Fig. 6 is a flowchart for use in describing the operation of an adaptive filter control circuit shown in Fig. 5. Previously proposed echo cancellers will first be described with reference to Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4. In Fig. 1, which illustrates a first previously proposed echo canceller, a line 1 is connected to a telephone set to be used by a proximal end speaker, and a line 2 is connected to a modem for a distal end speaker. As a result, the proximal end speaker and the distal end speaker can exchange voice signals by way of the lines 1 and 2. A voice signal proceeding from the line 1 to the line 2 is referred to as a transmitted signal S, and a voice signal proceeding from the line 2 to the line 1 is referred to as a received signal X. An echo canceller 3 is provided between the lines 1 and 2, particularly, on the side of the line 1. The received signal X is subjected to a digital/analog (D/A) conversion on the line 1 and also to a 4-wire/2-wire conversion before being output to the proximal end speaker. The voice being transmitted from the proximal end speaker is subjected to a 2-wire/4-wire conversion and an A/D conversion before being output to the echo canceller 3. That is, the transmitting signal S is a linear digital signal or a pulse code modulation (PCM) signal. The echo canceller 3 is normally designed to suppress any voice (echo) being received that is leaked to the line 1, through which the voice being transmitted is passed at the time of a 2-wire/4-wire conversion on the line 1. The echo canceller 3 is formed by a tap coefficient calculating circuit 31, a pseudo echo generating circuit 32, a subtracter 33 and an adaptive filter control circuit 34. Note that the tap coefficient calculating circuit 31 and the pseudo echo generating circuit 32 form an adaptive filter circuit. The transmitted signal S can be represented by the formula (1) : S = A + B Where A is the voice spoken by the proximal end speaker and the background noise, and B is the echo generated at the 2-wire/4-wire conversion in the line 1. The subtracter 33 subtracts a pseudo echo signal HX from the transmitted signal S by the formula (2) to obtain an error signal E: E = S - HX The pseudo echo signal HX is generated from the pseudo echo generating circuit 32. If the voice generated from the proximal end speaker is very small and the tap coefficients of the tap coefficient calculating circuit 31 are converged, E 0. In this case, if the proximal end speaker is not silent, E A. The pseudo echo signal HX for each signal symbol is calculated by the pseudo echo calculating circuit 32 using the formula (3): where H i is an i-th tap coefficient; and X (N-i) is a received signal symbol at (N-i) time before the current time. For example, X o denotes the current symbol of the received signal X, X 1 denotes a symbol of the received signal X which precedes the current symbol by one symbol..., and X N denotes a symbol of the received signal X which precedes the current symbol by N symbols. The tap coefficient calculating circuit 31 has N taps and N tap coefficients H i (i = 1, 2,..., N). For this purpose, the tap coefficient calculating circuit 31 includes N tap memories for storing the tap coefficients and an N-stage shift register for shifting the received signal X. The received signal X is input to the tap coefficient calculating circuit 31 to update the tap coefficients H i (i = 1, 2, ..., N) for each symbol. That is, a new tap coefficient H i for the current tap coefficient H i is estimated by the following formula (4): H i ' = H i + µ·E i ·X i -I/α where i is a tap number (i = 1, 2,..., N); µ is a convergence coefficient. Note that the tap coefficient calculating circuit 31 also includes a multiplexer, an adder, a subtracter and a control circuit therefor, in order to carry out the formula (4). Thus, the tap coefficients H i are usually converged by the tap coefficient calculating circuit 31, so that the error signal E is brought close to zero. In this case, the larger the convergence coefficient µ, the larger the convergence speed. The tap estimation using the formula (4) should be carried out only when the received signal X shows a sufficiently high level and the echo component due to the received signal X is much larger than the voice of the proximal end speaker or the background noise in the transmitted signal S. Otherwise, the operation of the tap estimation has to be suspended to avoid any degradation in the characteristics of the tap coefficients. In this case, the last tap coefficients are maintained. The determination of whether or not the tap estimation operation is carried out is made by the adaptive filter control circuit 34 which generates a control signal C and transmits it to the tap coefficient calculating circuit 31. Here, if C = "1", the tap coefficient calculating circuit 31 is operated, while if C = "0", the tap coefficient calculating circuit 31 is not operated. The operation of the adaptive filter control circuit 34 of Fig. 1 is described next with reference to Fig. 2. The routine of Fig. 2 is carried out by receiving one symbol of the received signal X. First, at step 201, it is determined whether or not the following formula (5) is satisfied: X < p1 where p1 is a constant. If X < p1, this means that the distal end speaker is recognized as silent. Therefore, the control proceeds to step 204 which causes the control signal C to be "0", so that the tap estimation operation is not carried out, otherwise, the control proceeds to step 202. At step 202, it is determined whether or not the following formula (6) is satisfied: S > p2·X where p2 is a constant not larger than 0.5. If S > p2 · X, this means that the proximal end speaker and the distal end speaker are both recognized to be obviously talking. This is a so-called double-talk state. Therefore, the control proceeds to step 204 which causes the control signal C to be "0", so that the tap estimation operation is not carried out, otherwise, the control proceeds to step 203. At step 203, it is determined whether or not the following formula (7) is satisfied: E > p3 · S where p3 is a constant. This means that an echo suppression amount (S/E) of the echo canceller 3 is so small that the voice component other than the echo takes a large proportion in the transmitted signal S. Therefore, in order to avoid any degradation in the characteristics of tap coefficients, the control proceeds to step 204 which causes the control signal C to be "0", so that the tap estimation operation is not carried out. Otherwise, the control proceeds to step 205 which causes the control signal C to be "1", so that the tap estimation operation is carried out. The above-described first previously proposed echo canceller, however, has the following problems. At step 202, the constant p2 is required to be accurately defined by the line 1. Also, when the level of the received signal X is higher than that of the transmitted signal S, it is difficult to detect any double-talk state. Contrary to this, if a smaller value is selected for the constant p2 in order to alleviate this problem, a double-talk state will be erroneously detected when the echo level is raised. In addition, even if the formula (6) at step 202 is satisfied, when a background noise occurs at the side of the proximal end speaker, a double-talk state will also be erroneously detected. Also, at step 203, if a double-talk state is correctly discriminated from a state where the tap coefficients are converging, a single-talk state will be mistaken for a double-talk state, so that the tap coefficients will stop converging. Additionally, if a 4-wire telephone set is linked to the line 1, or for some reason or another, acoustic coupling can take place between the generated echo and the telephone set, and such coupling may have a non-linear response, and in this case, the response level of the echo may be low. Therefore, if an echo suppression amount E/S represented by the formula (7) is used, this amount may be rather small and/or unstable, and hence, this amount cannot adequately be used for any determination. Further, when the response level of the echo of the line 2 is very low, when no echo takes place with a 4-wire telephone set connected to the line 2, or when a non-linear echo exists, the amount of echo suppression becomes small, so that a double-talk state may be detected erroneously. In Fig. 3, which illustrates a second previously proposed echo canceller (see: JP-A-7-170337), a variable attenuator 35 is added to the elements of Fig. 1, thus suppressing any residual echo by turning ON and OFF the variable attenuator 35 without being affected by the delay of an echo path. The operation of the adaptive filter control circuit 34 of Fig. 3 is described next with reference to Fig. 4. In Fig. 4, steps 401, 402 and 403 are provided instead of steps 202 and 203 of Fig. 2. That is, only if the determination at step 201 is negative, does the control proceed to steps 401, 402 and 403. At step 401, it is determined whether or not the following formula (8) is satisfied: S/E ≤ C 1 (SM/EM) Also, at step 402, it is determined whether or not the following formula (9) is satisfied: S/E ≤ C 2 (SM/EM) In the formulae (8) and (9), C 1 and c 2 are constants having a relationship such that 0 < C 1 < C 2 < 1 For example, C 1 = 1/4 and C 2 = 1/2. Also, SM and EM represent the average power of the transmitting signal S and the average value of the subtracter 33, respectively, when only the distal end speaker is talking so that the tap coefficients have been converged sufficiently in a single-talk state. Note that SM and EM of the formula (8) and (9) at steps 401 and 402 represent the current average power of the transmitted signal S and the current output value of the subtracter 33, respectively. If S/E ≤ C 1 · (SM/EM), this means that a complete double-talk state is realized. Therefore, the control proceeds to step 204 which causes the control signal C to be "0", so that the tap estimation operation is not carried out. If C 1 . (SM/EM) < S/E ≤ C 2 · (SM/EM), this means that an intermediate state between a double-talk state and a single-talk state exists. Therefore, the control proceeds to step 403 which turns ON the variable attenuator 35, and then, proceeds to step 204. If S/E > C 2 · (SM/EM), this means that a complete single-talk state is realized. Therefore. the control proceeds to step 205 which causes the control signal C to be "1", so that the tap estimation operation is carried out. In the above-described second previously proposed echo canceller, when the background noise is large on the side of the proximal end speaker, the value of SM/EM constantly shows a small value. Therefore, since the constants C 1 and C 2 are smaller than 1, the formulae (8) and (9) at steps 401 and 402 are constantly not satisfied. As a result, a tap estimation operation is constantly carried out which degrades the characteristics of the tap coefficients which may diverge at worst. In Fig. 5, which shows an embodiment for use in illustrating the present invention, a canceller 3' includes three adaptive filter circuits. The first adaptive filter circuit is formed by a tap coefficient calculating circuit 11 and a pseudo echo generating circuit 12 corresponding to the tap coefficient calculating circuit 31 and the pseudo echo generating circuit 32 of Fig. 1. A subtracter 13, corresponding to the subtracter 33 of Fig. 1, subtracts a pseudo echo signal HX1 from the transmitting signal S by a formula similar to the formula (2): E1 = S - HX1 The second adaptive filter circuit is formed by a tap coefficient calculating circuit 14 and a pseudo echo generating circuit 15 corresponding to the tap coefficient calculating circuit 31 and the pseudo echo generating circuit 32 of Fig. 1. A subtracter 16 corresponding to the subtracter 33 of Fig. 1 subtracts a pseudo echo signal HX2 from the transmitting signal S by a formula similar to the formula (2): E2 = S - HX2 In the first and second adaptive filter circuits, the pseudo echo signals HX1 and HX2 are calculated in the pseudo echo generating circuits 12 and 15, respectively, for each symbol using the formula (3), and the tap coefficients H1 and H2 are calculated in the tap coefficient calculating circuits 11 and 14, respectively, for each symbol using the formula (4). That is, the first adaptive filter circuit (11, 12) operates similarly to the second adaptive filter (14, 15), but the first and second adaptive filter circuits have convergence coefficients that are different from each other. The tap coefficient calculating circuit 11 uses µ1 and the tap coefficient calculating circuit 13 uses µ2 where µ1 > µ2. Thus, in a single-talk state where only the distal end speaker is talking, the first adaptive filter circuit (11, 12) shows a quick convergence to provide a relationship of E1<E2, whereas, in a case in which the proximal end speaker starts talking and/or the background noise becomes large to degrade the characteristics of the tap coefficients, there is a relationship of E1>E2, because the characteristics of the tap coefficients are degraded slowly for the tap coefficient calculating circuit 14. The third adaptive filter is formed by a tap coefficient memory 17, an N-stage shift register 18 and a pseudo echo generating circuit 19 corresponding to the pseudo echo generating circuit 33 of Fig. 1. A subtracter 20, corresponding to the subtracter 33 of Fig. 1, subtracts a pseudo echo signal HX3 from the transmitting signal by a formula similar to the formula (2) : E3 = S - HX3 In the third adaptive filter circuit, the pseudo echo signal HX3 is calculated in the pseudo echo generating circuit 19 for each symbol using the formula (3)., However, in the third adaptive filter circuit, the tap coefficients are not calculated, but the tap coefficients are supplied from a filter selector 21 to the tap coefficient memory 17. For every M symbols, the filter selector 21 receives tap coefficients H1 from the tap coefficient calculating circuit 11, tap coefficients H2 from the tap coefficient calculating circuit 14, and tap coefficients H3 from the tap coefficient memory 17. Note that the tap coefficients H3 are stored temporarily in the register 17a. Then, the filter selector 20 selects one of the three sets of tap coefficients as optimal tap coefficients H4 according to a control signal C provided by an adaptive filter control circuit 22 and transmits them to the tap coefficient memory 17. The adaptive filter control circuit 21 receives the transmitted signal S from the line 1, the received signal X from the line 2, the error signal E1 from the subtracter 13, and the error signal E2 from the subtracter 16, and determines the state of transmission and reception and the state of the tap coefficients in the tap coefficient calculating circuits 11 and 14 for each M symbol. The tap coefficient memory 17 constantly stores N tap coefficients and outputs them to the pseudo echo generating circuit 19 for each symbol. On the other hand, as stated above, the tap coefficients of the tap coefficient memory 17 are updated by each M symbol, so that the tap coefficients H4 are provided by the filter selector 20 as optimal tap coefficients during the succeeding M symbols. In this case, the tap coefficients that have been stored in the tap coefficient memory 17 until the updating are output as the tap coefficients H3 to the filter selector 20. Since the adaptive filter selector 21 and the adaptive filter control circuit 22 are operated for each M symbol, the pseudo echo generating circuit 19 and the subtracter 20 need to be operated for a delayed transmitted signal and a delayed received signal. For this purpose, delay circuits 23 and 24 are provided. That is, the delay circuit 23 delays the transmitted signal S by M symbols and transmits it to the subtracter 20. Also, the delay circuit 24 delays the received signal X by M symbols and transmits it to the shift register 18. The operation of the adaptive filter control circuit 22 of Fig. 5 is described next with reference to Fig. 6. The routine of Fig. 6 is carried out by receiving each M symbol of the received signal X. First, at step 601, in the same way as in step 201 of Fig. 2, it is determined whether or not the following formula (10) is satisfied. X< p4 where p4 is a constant. If X<p4, this means that the distal end speaker is recognized as silent. Therefore, the control proceeds to step 605 which causes the control signal C to be C3 for selecting the tap coefficients H3. As a result, the tap coefficients H3 are again stored in the tap coefficient memory 17. In other words, the tap estimation operation is substantially stopped. Further, at step 606, the adaptive filter control circuit 22 initializes the tap coefficients of the tap coefficient calculating circuits 11 and 14 by using the tap coefficients H3. Otherwise, the control proceeds to step 602. At step 602, it is determined whether or not the following formula (11) is satisfied: S>p5 · X where p5 is a constant. Note that 0.5 can most appropriately be used for the constant p5. This is because the CCITT Standards provide that an echo signal should be at a level of 0.5 times that of a received signal at most and the constant p5 should be exploited maximally in order to prevent a double-talk state from being erroneously detected due to the echo signal. At step 602, if S>p5.X, this determines that a single-talk state of the proximal end speaker or a double-talk state is realized. Therefore, the control proceeds to step 605, so that the tap coefficients H3 are again stored in the tap coefficient memory 17. Also, at step 606, the tap coefficients of the tap coefficient calculating circuits 11 and 14 are initialized by using the tap coefficients H3. Otherwise, the control proceeds to step 603. At step 603, it is determined whether or not the following formula (12) is satisfied: p6 · | E1 | < | E2 | where p6 is a constant. If p6 · | E1 | < | E2 |, this determines that a signal is currently being received, and the voice of the proximal end speaker and the background noise do not affect the tap estimation operation. Therefore, the control proceeds to step 608 which causes the control signal C to be C1 for selecting the tap coefficients H1. As a result, the tap coefficients H1 are stored in the tap coefficient memory 17. Otherwise, the control proceeds to step 604. At step 604, it is determined whether or not the following formula (13) is satisfied: p7 · | E2 | < | S | where p7 is a constant. If p7 · | E2 | < | S |, this determines that the tap coefficients are fairly converged. Therefore, the control proceeds to step 607 which causes the control signal C to be C2 for selecting the tap coefficients H2. As a result, the tap coefficients H2 are stored in the tap coefficient memory 17. Otherwise, this determines that a voice is being received but the characteristics of the tap coefficients are being degraded by external disturbances (voice, background sound, etc.) on the side of the proximal end speaker. Therefore, the control proceeds to step 605 which causes the control signal C to be C3 for selecting the tap coefficients H3. As a result, the tap coefficients H3 are again stored in the tap coefficient memory 17. Also, at step 606, the tap coefficients of the tap coefficient calculating circuits 11 and 14 are initialized by using the tap coefficients H3. As explained, in the arrangement described above in illustration of the present invention, since the two adaptive filter circuits are constantly operating for tap estimation, any deceleration in the converging rate and any suspension of convergence due to a wrong determination of a double-talk state can be avoided effectively. Also, the current state of transmission and reception is not determined only by the levels of the transmitted signal and the received signal, and the tap coefficients are estimated by means of two different convergence coefficients in the two adaptive filter circuits, so that the current state of transmission and reception is determined by determining whether the characteristics of the tap coefficients are being improved or degraded. As a result, even when the background noise is large, the tap estimation operation can be carried out without degrading the characteristics of the tap coefficients. Additionally, the need for accurately selecting parameters by means of the line is eliminated. Further, a determination of a double-talk state can be made quickly and accurately for the above-mentioned reasons. Moreover, even if a non-linear echo exists, the tap coefficients are converged, through somewhat slowly, so that echo can be suppressed to a certain extent. It will be understood that although a particular embodiment has been described, by way of example, in illustration of the invention, variations and modifications thereof, as well as other embodiments may be made within the scope of the protection sought by the appended claims.

Claims: An echo canceller including a first adaptive filter circuit (11, 12) for receiving a received signal (X), for calculating first tap coefficients (H1) using a first convergence coefficient (µ1) and for generating a first pseudo echo signal (HX1) in accordance with the first tap coefficients and the received signal, a first subtracter (13), connected to the first adaptive filter circuit, for receiving a transmitted signal (S) and for subtracting the first pseudo echo signal from the transmitted signal to generate a first error signal (E1), defined by the first pseudo echo signal minus the transmited signal, a second adaptive filter circuit (14, 15) for receiving the received signal, for calculating second tap coefficients (H2) using a second convergence coefficient (µ2) smaller than the first convergence coefficient, and for generating a second pseudo echo signal (HX2) in accordance with the second tap coefficients and the received signal, a second subtracter (16), connected to the second adaptive filter circuit, for receiving the transmitted signal and subtracting the second pseudo echo signal from the transmitted signal to generate a second error signal (E2),defined by the second pseudo echo signal minus the transmitted signal, a control circuit (21, 22), connected to the first and second adaptive filter circuits and the first and second subtracters, for selecting one set of the first tap coefficients and the second tap coefficients in accordance with the received signal, the transmitted signal, and the first and second error signals, a third adaptive filter circuit (17, 18, 19), connected to the control circuit, for receiving the received signal and the transmitted signal and generating a third pseudo echo signal (HX3) in accordance with the set of tap coefficients selected by the control circuit and the received signal, and a third subtracter (20), connected to the third adaptive filter circuit, for subtracting the third pseudo echo signal from the transmitted signal to generate a third error signal (E3), defined by the third psuedo echo signal minus the transmited signal, wherein the control circuit includes means for determining whether or not the average power of the received signal is smaller than a first value (p4), means for determining whether or not the ratio of the average power of the transmitted signal to the average power of the received signal is larger than a second value (p5), means for determining whether or not the ratio of the average power of the second error signal to the average power of the first error signal is greater than a third value (p6), means for determining whether or not the ratio of the average power of the transmitted signal to the average power of the second erreur signal is greater than a fourth value (p7), means for selecting the first tap coefficients when the average power of the received signal is not smaller than the first value, the ratio of the average power of the transmitted signal to the average power of the received signal is not larger than the second value, and the ratio of the average power of the first error signal to the average power of the second error signal is smaller than the third value, and means for selecting the second tap coefficients when the average power of the received signal is not smaller than the first value, the ratio of the average power of the transmitted signal to the average power of the received signal is not larger than the second value, the ratio of the average power of the first error signal to the average power of the second error signal is not smaller than the third value, and the ratio of the average power of the second error signal to the average power of the transmitted signal is smaller than the fourth value. An echo canceller as claimed in claim 1, wherein the control circuit includes means for fixing the selected tap coefficients when the average power of the received signal is smaller than the first value, when, the average power of the received signal is not smaller than the first value and the ratio of the average power of the transmitted signal to the average power of the received signal is larger than the second value, or when the average power of the received signal is not smaller than the first value, the ratio of the average power of the transmitted signal to the average power of the received signal is not larger than the second value, the ratio of the average power of the first error signal to the average power of the second error signal is not smaller than the third value, and the ratio of the average power of the second error signal to the average power of the transmitted signal is not smaller than the fourth value. An echo canceller as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second value is 0.5. An echo canceller as claimed in claim 1, including a first delay circuit (24) connected to the third adaptive filter circuit, the received signal being supplied via the first delay circuit to the third adaptive filter circuit, and a second delay circuit (25) connected to the third subtracter, the transmitted signal being supplied via the second delay circuit to the third subtracter. An echo canceller as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first adaptive filter circuit (11, 12) for receiving a received signal (X), calculates first tap coefficients (H1) using the first convergence coefficient (µ1) for each symbol of the received signal, and generates the first pseudo echo signal (HX1) in accordance with the first tap coefficients and the received signal for each symbol of the received signal, wherein the second adaptive filter circuit (14, 15) receives the received signal, calculates second tap coefficients (H2) using the second convergence coefficient (µ2) smaller than the first convergence coefficient for each symbol of the received signal, and generates the second pseudo echo signal (HX2) in accordance with the second tap coefficients and the received signal for each symbol of the received signal, wherein the third adaptive filter circuit includes a tap coefficient memory (17) for storing third tap coefficients (H4), a shift register (18) for storing the received signal, and a pseudo echo generating circuit (19), connected to the tap coefficient memory and the shift register, for generating a third pseudo echo signal (HX3) in accordance with the tap coefficients stored in the tap coefficient memory and the received signal stored in the shift register, wherein the control circuit includes a selector (21), connected to the first and second adaptive filters and the tap coefficient memory, for selecting one set of the first, second, and third tap coefficients and transmitting a selected set of the first, second and third tap coefficients to the tap coefficient memory, and an adaptive filter control circuit (22), connected to the first and second adaptive filter circuits and the first and second subtracters, for operating the selector in accordance with the received signal, the transmitted signal, and the first and second error signals for every M symbol of the received signal. An echo canceller as claimed in claim 5, wherein the adaptove filter control circuit includes means for initializing the first and second tap coefficients of the first and second adaptive filter circuits by the third tap coefficients and the selector is caused to select the the tap coefficients.

Inventors: MURAOKA SHINYA, MURAOKA, SHINYA
Applicants: NIPPON ELECTRIC CO, NEC CORPORATION
Application year: 1998
Main classification: H04B3
IPC codes: H04B3