Digital bi - static spread spectrum radar

Abstract: Bi-static radar, with pseudo-random signal transmission, constituted by a transmitter and a receiver connected to separate antennas placed at distant locations. Pseudo-random (spread spectrum) signal transmission allows to detect less reflective and more distant targets when compared to traditional radar with the same available power and bandwidth. This result (as all range cells of all receiving beams are simultaneously processed in parallel) is due to the greater energy incident on the target and the peculiar receiver . The receiver beams simultaneity is due to joint use of receiving array antenna and digital beam-forming techniques. The parallel analysis of all range cells is assured by the architecture of the digital receiver. The radar exhibits low probability of detection by ECM receivers and excellent anti-jamming resistance. The radar can be used in military, civil and scientific appications and in the guidance of devices using passive sensors.

Description: The invention concerns a radar using a transmission method with a pseudo - random signal (spread spectrum), which allows an optimal usage of the available transmission power. This radar is constituted by a transmitter and a receiver capable to be connected, respectively, to physically and functionally separate antennas, also of different types, that can be located in different places, also very far away from each other. The radar transmission method uses a continuous, pseudo-random, signal, known also as spread spectrum signal ,or in short, (spread spectrum), that allows to detect targets less reflective and more distant, when compared to traditional radar with the same available power and for a fixed bandwidth availability. This behavior is due to the greater energy incident on the target and to the particular type of the receiver used. (During the description, English peculiar terms have been used, of the specific language used in radar technology, to make easier the text's comprehension to the experts of the field). The originality of the invention is essentially based on the combination of the following elements: pseudo-random characteristics (spread spectrum) of the transmitted signal; physical and functional separation of the transmitting and receiving antennas (bi - static radar); usage of an array antenna as receiving antenna; analog to digital conversion of the signal received from each elementary antenna of the array; parallel and simultaneous forming (with a digital technique) of the receiving beams; simultaneous multiple correlation and parallel architecture of the digital receivers connected to each output of the digital beam forming network. As well known, radar is an apparatus that can detect the presence of objects, normally with no cooperation, which are located at a certain distance from it (radar range), by employing the property of the objects to reflect electromagnetic energy transmitted by the radar itself. This energy is intercepted by the target, and a part of it is scattered in the space. The radar receiving antenna collects a part of the energy scattered by the target and sends it to the receiver, which processes it just to detect the presence of an echo and to extract position data, and possibly velocity data. Currently, two main types of radar are employed: pulsed radar and continuous wave radar. In the pulsed radar the measure of target distance is performed by the measurement of the time elapsed from the transmission of an electromagnetic energy pulse to the reception of its echo. In the continuous wave radar, a continuous wave, typically frequency modulated by a triangular signal, is transmitted. The measure of the target distance is made through the measurement of the frequency shift between the transmitted signal and the one eventually received. Normally the radar in operation uses the same antenna both to transmit, and to receive signals. A radar that uses different antennas for transmission and reception is named, in the literature, as bistatic radar, and, to the best knowledge of the inventors, it has never been realised accordingly to the present invention. Particularly, in "An X-Band Bistatic Radar System", European Microwave Conference, vol.1, 13 September 1990, pages 867-873, XP000327018, Budapest, Hungary, Betts discloses a short-range tactical bistatic radar, using signals within a wide choice of modulations, both pulsed and continuous, at X-band, including high Pulse Repetition Frequency (PRF) operation, with bandwidths of up to 2MHz. Such disclosure aims at solving the problem of prior bistatic configurations due to mechanical rapid steering of the receiver in order to allow the receiver beam to follow the transmitted pulse through space, encompassing the surveillance volume so as to intercept possible returning echoes (pulse chasing). The solution proposed by Betts uses a linear phased array receiver connected to a digital Beam Former Unit, connected in turn to a Beam Selection Unit, which allows pulse chasing to be implemented through selecting beams in synchronisation with the transmitter. However, beam steering implemented through the combination of Beam Former Unit and Beam Selection Unit still experiences losses due to beam steering and not simultaneous analysis of the received beams which prevents from monitoring continuously the whole surveillance volume, consequently introducing "blind" time intervals during which the position of possibly detectable objects is unknown. Moreover, in order to minimise violation of bistatic intrusion detection sensor (IDS) through determination of transmitted subcarrier frequency and consequently easy generation of false signal, a solution is proposed in "Spread Spectrum Technology Applied to Microwave Bistatic Intrusion Detection sensors", Proceedings 1985 Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, 17 May 1985, pages 65-74, XP002079465, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky USA, by Blattman, through using spread spectrum technology. Blattman discloses an IDS, operating at X-band, comprising a transmitting antenna which focuses a spread spectrum microwave signal to a narrow beam and radiates it through the zone of protection directly to a receiving antenna, where the transmitted signal is radiated along short distance. However, the proposed spread spectrum IDS aims at detecting only the presence of a possible intruder in a extremely limited zone of protection, and not its position (or distance from the receiving antenna) as a radar system does with reference to a larger space. It is also known that the radar performances generally depend on its capacity to detect the echo energy reflected by the target. To obtain this result, it is possible, either to increase the energy incident on the target, or to increase the receiver sensitivity. The radar, to which the presented invention refers, employs the transmission of a continuous, pseudo - random, spread spectrum signal. This signal, with the same available power and for a fixed bandwidth availability allows to detect less reflecting and more distant objects, with respect to the two radar types previously mentioned. This effect is de to the increased energy incident on the target, and to the peculiar type of receiver used. This result is obtained without any reduction of the simultaneous and parallel analysis capacity of all radar beams and all radar range cells. The simultaneity of the receiving beams is ensured by the array antenna usage and by the digital beam forming technique.The parallel analysis of all the range cells is ensured by the peculiar architecture of the digital receiver. An alternative method for describing the bistatic spread spectrum radar operation, in the case of the transmission of a pseudo-random DS-SS(DirectSequence-Spread Spectrum) signal,is the following: the system pushes to the limit the integration gain of consecutive pulses by removing the usual limitation of the maximum number of pulses transmitted in a beam. With respect to the previously mentioned solutions (pulsed radar and continuous wave radar, almost always mono-static), the present radar offers also other advantages, some of which are described here: The receiving antenna is of passive type and therefore results virtually invisible to electromagnetic detection: that antenna, in fact, can be located far away from the transmitting one (active antenna), that is the only detectable antenna, since it radiates an electromagnetic signal. Due to the processing gain associated with the usage in this radar of the spread spectrum transmission technique , it is possible to detect targets much smaller and more distant than before. Furthermore, due to the pseudo- noise (spread spectrum) signal usage, the radar transmission results very difficult to detect and/or less disturbing towards other systems (low interference). This means that the radar exhibits LPI/LI (Low Probability of Intercept/Low Interference) properties. The transmitting antenna appears, from the transmitted signal (signature) point of view, as a generic telecommunication transmitter and allows for a better camouflage of the radar itself. The availability of many classes of spread spectrum signals allows for a code agility, that, joined with the usual frequency agility, makes very difficult the ECM (Electronic counter Measures) techniques. The anti-ECM resistance characteristics are enhanced with respect to the intentional disturbances (jamming), that are reduced both by the processing gain asspciated with the spread spectrum signal usage, and by the possibility to reduce the receiving array antenna gain in the direction of the noise source (jammer), with the use of the "nulling lobe" classic technique, in the digital beam forming network. By the absence of refrigerating devices and antenna rotation devices, the antenna assembly is simplified (with a further reduction of weight), and this ensures to the radar a better reliability and capability to withstand the environmental stress, either natural or intentional. In summary, the present radar has a very low probability to be detected (LPI Low Probability of Intercept), exhibits a good resistance to jamming (AJ Anti-Jamming), shows a low ARM (Anti Radiation Missiles) missiles vulnerability due to the array passive receiving antenna and, particularly, it has better detection characteristics, with equality of available transmitted power. The invention which is defined in claim 1 is located in the scientific field of radar, more particularly in the military radar field, with surveillance finality and eventually as an help to the guidance of devices using passive sensors, and it is applicable both in the military, and in the civil application field. The radar to which present patent request refers, is constituted of a transmitter and a receiver respectively connected to physically separated antennas, also of different type, that can be installed in different locations, also very far away from each other. The transmitting antenna can be of various types: dipole, Yagi, reflector antenna, horn radiator antenna, array antenna, etc., depending on the radar working frequency and the desired polarization, provided that it can show coverage characteristics matching the surveillance volume. For example, if an essentially omnidirectional azimuth coverage, with an elevation angle not too high, is requested, a simple vertical dipole can be used. The transmitter must continuously radiate in the surveillanc volume, a pseudo-random signal (pseudo noise), centered on the requested carrier radio frequency, with a power adequate to the requested range of the target type of interest. As well known, a pseudo - random signal, often indicated as "pseudo noise" or "spread spectrum", shows the characteristic to have autocorrelation properties, very similar to the noise, but to be nevertheless of deterministic type, that is well known a priori to the radar receiver. A "pseudo noise" type signal, which can be used, is the signal described in the literature as "direct sequence spread spectrum" (DS - SS), that is made of a sequence of digital pulses produced by a "pseudo noise" code generator. It is useful to note that also other pseudo-random signal types ("pseudo noise" or "spread spectrum"), with autocorrelation characteristics similar to that of the noise, could be used with an equal profit by the system. The pseudo - random signal is converted to the interested transmission frequency, with a simple or multiple frequency conversion technique. In the event that it is interesting to periodically change the carrier radio frequency, it is possible to employ the frequency agility technique, described in the literature as "frequency hopping" (FH). An essential advantageous characteristic of the radar transmitter is the possibility to generate, with direct digital synthesis techniques, the "spread spectrum" signal in base band (BB), and to convert it, in a second time, to the final transmission frequency, or the one to generate directly its version centered on the intermediate frequency (IF), or finally to generate its version centered directly on the carrier transmission frequency. If it is chosen the direct digital synthesis of the pseudo-random signal (spread spectrum) directly into the intermediate frequency (IF), or into the final radio frequency, the total number of the frequency conversions needed is lower. The receiving antenna is constituted by an array of elementary receiving antennas. The elementary antennas can also be of different types, for example dipole, horn radiator, Yagi, microstrip, etc. Each elementary antenna of the receiving array is directly connected to a frequency converter with a low noise figure (low noise figure (block) frequency (down) converter), that, in turn, feeds an analog-to-digital dedicated converter (A/D converter). The A/D conversion frequency is sufficiently high to allow both the correct conversion of the received signal, and to avoid the phenomenon known as "aliasing". The number of bit of the A/D converter is such as to ensure the correct operation of the radar in the whole expected dynamic of the received signal. The digital streams coming from each element of the array (with "element" we intend the set of elementary antenna, the "low noise" frequency converter and the A/D converter) feed the digital beam former ("digital beam forming network"). This has as many (digital) inputs as the number of elements of the array and as many (digital) outputs as the number of beams necessary to cover the space sector of interest. For example, if we needed 250 beams and the array had 100 elements, the digital beam formqr ("digital beam forming network") would have 100 (digital) inputs and 250 (digital) outputs. The input and output digital data streams of the "digital beam forming network" are obviously parallel and simultaneous. For each beam of interest in the receiver coverage, the "digital beam forming network" performs the task to compute, with suitable complex (i.e. with real and imaginary parts) coefficients, the linear combination of the digital inputs which best synthesizes the beam of interest. With the term "suitable" we intend the fact that the coefficients are such as to synthesize the beam of interest according to the normal rules of the array antennas technology. The suitable coefficients, for each beam, are computed with respect to the usage conditions. In fact, if we wish to minimize the effects of an eventual interference signal, we could use the well known adaptive suppression technique ("adaptive suppression of interference signal"), known also as "array (adaptive) nulling technique", currently used for array antennas. Each digital output of the "digital beam forming network", that is the digital signal associated to each beam of the receiving antenna, feeds a dedicated digital receiver. Each digital receiver has, in turn, the task to operate, in parallel and simultaneously, the digital correlation of the echo signal received, with local replicas, with suitable delay, of the pseudo random ("spread spectrum") transmitted signal. Each delayed replica of the transmitted signal can detect the echo signal coming from each elementary distance cell ("range cell") in which each receiving beam can be divided. The synchronization between transmitter and receiver, needed to facilitate the received signal demodulation and the process of digital correlation, is supplied by an auxiliary channel (cable, optical fiber, radio channel). The receiver, in fact, must have available: the transmitted carrier frequency information; the information related to the initial time (epoch) of the transmission of the base pseudo random "spread spectrum" signal; the identifier of the particular pseudo random transmitted signal and, in the case, the particular carrier frequency used with "frequency hopping" ; the relative position of transmitter and receiver and, preferably, the (optional) information relative to the clock used in the transmitted signal synthesis. The presented radar is capable of transmitting a continuous pseudo random (spread spectrum) signal and, with the same available power and for a certain band availability, allows, as just said before, to detect objects less reflective and more distant, with respect to the two types of radar previously cited, due to the greater energy incident on the target and to the type of receiver used (see fig. 5). The invention is described now with reference to the version actually preferred by the inventors, and based on the attached drawings. Fig. 1 - Action scenery of the bi-static digital radar. Fig. 2 - Operation principle of the correlation digital receivers connected to a generic receiving beam. Fig. 3 - comparison table between a pulsed radar and the digital bi-static radar, object of the present patent pending. Fig. 4 - Feature comparison between pulsed radar and digital bi-static radar. Fig. 5 - schematic representation, in the signal space, of the pulsed radar a); the continuous wave radar b); and digital spread spectrum radar c); in said figure: t = time; T = pulse repetition interval; τ = pulse duration; B = bandwidth and P = power. Fig. 6 - schematic representation of the correlation processor R4) for the detection of the target presence into the cell -Pure correlation architecture. Fig. 7 - schematic representation of the processor (R4) for the detection of the target presence into the cell -FIR filter (FIR matched filter) architecture. With reference to Fig. 1, T1 is the digital generation block of the pseudo random signal. The block is constituted by the digital clock generator T11, the pseudo random digital signal synthesizer T12, and the frequency converter FC-T13. The frequency converter Fc is absent if the pseudo random signal is digitally generated directly at the desired carrier frequency. T2 indicates the linear power amplifier. T3 indicates the transmitting antenna. R1 indicates the receiving array antenna. R2 is the set of low noise figure frequency converters (LNC) and the Analog - to Digital converters (A/D). Each LNC-A/D unit is connected to the corresponding elementary antenna of the array. The number of the elementary antennas of the array is indicated with N and represents also the number of digital inputs simultaneous and parallel to R3. R3 indicates the digital beam forming network of the parallel and simultaneous receiving beams. The number of such beams is indicated by M. R4 indicates the set of correlation digital receivers associated to the cells. More precisely, R4 is the schematization of the radar echo detecting unit, where the rows are the single beams, and the columns are the cells c in range. When an echo is detected by the correlation digital receiver associated to the c cell, the digital signal can be represented to the operator, or submitted to further computations, proper of the target classification, discrimination, identification and clutter suppression techniques. For each output of R3, corresponding to a receiving beam, there are as many digital correlators K as the range cells of interest. In the schematic diagram it can be noted that the presence of targets in the beams M1 and M2 produces a correlation peak in correspondence of the range cells marked with a little black dot (•). R5 indicates the digital presentation device of the processed radar signal, or another system to which the digital information provided by the radar is to be sent. In the schematic diagram we have indicated, to be simple, a display device of PPI type. S indicates the auxiliary synchronization channel. This channel carries the information relative to the frequency currently in use, to make a correct low noise figure frequency conversion of R2, and also the information relative to the initial time of generation of the transmitted base pseudo random signal and in the case the digital clock (optional). With reference to Fig. 2, it is showed the detecting principle (with correlation) of the received pseudo random signal, containing the information of the target presence. In Fig. 2-f), the Es echo signal, coming from a generic beam, is received by the array antenna R1, processed as described in Fig. 1, until the output of the signal from the digital beam forming network. The digital signal received is then correlated with copies of the reference signal SF, suitably delayed on the base of range cell that will be observed. When the echo signal eventually received is aligned with the delayed copy of the reference signal SF, corresponding to the range cell observed, the correlation peak detecting the target is obtained. The two processors described are used for the same finality of target detection, with the difference that the first described (Fig. 6) allows the detection of the target at the end of signal reception, while the second (Fig. 7) allows the partial detection of the target during the reception of the pseudo random sequence. These processors represent one of the interesting aspects of the present patent pending. With reference to Fig. 2 e), it is showed there the echo of return signal after the digital beam forming network and the replicas SF of the reference signal which are time delayed of a quantity corresponding to the c cell distance. With reference to the Figs. 3 and 4, it is showed the comparison between the performance of a pulsed radar and that of the bi-static spread spectrum digital radar, in terms of signal to noise ratio, and therefore of target "detecting capability". It can be noted the advantage, in the specific case, of about 40 dB, due to the "processing gain", or, more simply, to the integration of the greater energy incident on the target. As already said, the correlation digital receiver can be implemented in two different configurations, showed in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7. In the case of Fig. 6, the correlation digital receivers (R4) operate on a digital correlation simplified architecture basis, which can be better realized with a processor of DSP (Digital signal Processor) type, to which are assigned the functions of sub-correlation of the received signal (I and Q components) with time-delayed replicas of the time τ of the transmitted signal, their partial integration Σ and its successive processing by the FFT. These DSP are commercially available. It must be noted that the sub correlation and the successive processing by the FFT allow on one hand to avoid the "destructive" phase lag on the correlation gain introduced by the Doppler effect associated to the radial velocity of the target, obtaining on the other hand as an additive result, the detecting and the estimate of the Doppler itself. In the case of Fig. 7, the correlation digital receivers (R4) are realized using one or more dedicated devices (ASIC, FPGA, etc.), made of process elements composed by two registers for the I and Q components of the received signal (Reg. I and Reg. Q), by the elementary correlators of the reference signal (a1, a2,... aN), by the partial adders Σ, by the FFT with N inputs and N outputs, by the module extractor (MODEXTR) with N inputs and N outputs, by the maximum detector (MAX), and by a further sawtooth correlator.

Claims: Bi-static spread spectrum digital radar, comprising a transmitting means (T1), provided with a digital clock generator (T11) and connected to a transmitting antenna means (T2, T3) for radiating a surveillance volume, and a receiving means, connected to a receiving array antenna (R1), which comprises a digital beam forming network (R3) having a set of inputs and a set of outputs, the set of inputs of the digital beam forming network (R3) being connected to the receiving array antenna (R1) through a set (R2) of corresponding pairs comprising a frequency converter and an analog to digital converter, the radar being characterised in that the transmitting means (T1) comprises a pseudo random digital signal generator (T12), for generating a spread spectrum signal, to which the digital clock generator (T11) is connected, in that the transmitting antenna means (T2, T3) continuously radiates the whole surveillance volume, and in that the receiving means comprises a set (R4) of correlation digital receivers connected to the set of outputs of the digital beam forming network (R3) for parallel processing signals from the set of outputs of the digital beam forming network (R3). Bi-static spread spectrum digital radar according to claim 1, characterized in that the pseudo random digital signal generator (T12) is a digital generator of variable length pseudo random codes with minimum correlation. Bi-static spread spectrum digital radar according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the transmitting means (T1) further comprises a frequency converter (FC) connected between the pseudo random digital signal generator (T12) and the transmitting antenna means (T2, T3). Bi-static spread spectrum digital radar according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the digital clock generator (T11) is highly stable, generating a quartz or rubidium or cesium or Global Position System (GPS) signal derived frequency reference. Bi-static spread spectrum digital radar according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the transmitting antenna means (T2, T3) comprises a transmitting antenna (T3) being a dipole antenna or a Yagi antenna or a reflector antenna or a horn radiator antenna or an array antenna. Bi-static spread spectrum digital radar according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the receiving array antenna (R1) comprises a set of elementary antennas being dipole antennas or hom radiator antennas or Yagi antennas or microstrip antennas, Bi-static spread spectrum digital radar according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the digital beam forming network (R3) is a variable coefficient linear network having a number of inputs equal to a number of elementary antennas of the receiving array antenna (R1) and a number of outputs equal to a number of beams formed. Bi-static spread spectrum digital radar according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that each correlation digital receiver of the set (R4) is adapted to process the signal from the corresponding output of the digital beam forming network (R3) in order to perform: a first step for sub-correlating said signal with delayed replicas of the transmitted pseudo random digital signal, a second step for partial integrating sub-correlated signals, and a third step for executing a Fast Fourier Transform of the partially integrated signal. Bi-static spread spectrum digital radar according to any one of the claims 1-7, characterized in that each correlation digital receiver of the set (R4) comprises: two registers, comprising a number of cells, for I and Q components respectively of the signal from the corresponding output of the digital beam forming network (R3), a number of elementary correlators equal to the number of all the cells of the two registers, each elementary correlator being connected to a corresponding cell for correlating the cell signal with a replica of the transmitted pseudo random digital signal, a set of partial adders, each adder being connected to a corresponding set of elementary correlators for adding corresponding correlated signals, a Fast Fourier Transform processor comprising a set of inputs, to which the set of partial adders is connected, and a set of outputs, a module extractor comprising a set of inputs, to which the set of outputs of the Fast Fourier Transform processor is connected, and a set of outputs, a maximum detector comprising a set of inputs, to which the set of outputs of the module extractor is connected, and one output, and a sawtooth correlator comprising at least one input, to which the said one output of the maximum detector is connected, and at least one output. Bi-static spread spectrum digital radar according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the set (R4) of correlation digital receivers comprises at least one digital signal processor (DSP). Bi-static spread spectrum digital radar according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the set (R4) of correlation digital receivers comprises at least one ASIC device and/or at least one FPGA device.

Inventors: CELLAI LUCA, DE MARTINO DOMENICO, CELLAI, LUCA, DE MARTINO, DOMENICO
Applicants: SPACE ENGINEERING SPA, SPACE ENGINEERING S.P.A.
Application year: 1998
Main classification: G01S13
IPC codes: G01S13