METHOD AND DEVICE FOR A FIN-STABILISED SHELL

Abstract: The present invention relates to a method and a device relating to shells with deployable fins and which are fired from large calibre guns into ballistic trajectories, for preventing the propellant gas pressure in the barrel during firing from directly or indirectly deforming the said fins (9-13). The type of fins that the present invention primarily relates to are those that are deployed on command in order to fin-stabilise the shell. Usually such fins are protected prior to deployment by an ejectable fin protector (19). To prevent this fin protector from being deformed and consequently impeding fin deployment or degrading fin functionality, the present invention proposes that all unoccupied space inside the said fin protector be filled with an inert, non-combustible, non-glutinous substance (32) of low compressibility and very low inherent strength. This substance, which completely fills the space inside the fin protector around the fins (9-13), will detach from the fins after fin deployment as a result of mainly centrifugal forces, but until that point in time will effectively prevent all undesirable deformation of the fin protector and thereby indirectly of the fins. Until ejected the fin protector (19) is thus fully sealed.

Description: METHOD AND DEVICE FOR A FIN-STABILISED SHELL The present invention relates to a method and a device of importance for shells fired from rifled or smooth-bore gun barrels, which shells during at least some phase of their trajectory are fin-stabilised by fms that deploy from the body of the shell, and which fms during the initial firing phase until the point in time when their stabilising function is actuated are hinged down against the casing of the shell and are protected by a protector or equivalent that is ejectable when the fins are to be deployed. Furthermore, the present invention is a method and a device that enables the driving band on such shells to be located at its most advantageous position without negatively affecting the shell during the firing phase with undeployed fins. Artillery shells are usually spin-stabilised throughout their trajectory until impact with the target or self-detonation or, if the task is to disperse a cargo of, for example, bomblets, until the point in the trajectory at which this is implemented. There are also, however, numerous types of special shells that are spin-stabilised during a greater or lesser part of their trajectory. Shells which shall be spin-stabilised during a greater or lesser part of their trajectory can either be fired from the barrel with full spin and have the rate of spin decelerated in conjunction with fin deployment, or they can be fired from a rifled or smooth-bore barrel imparting little or no spin — in a rifled barrel by means of a slipping driving band, for example. There may be several reasons for making an artillery shell fin-stabilised instead of in the simplest and most usual manner letting it be spin-stabilised, but in the case of trajectory correctable munitions or terminally guided shells whose trajectories can be corrected by means of command activated thruster rockets, deployable deceleration devices, guidance devices or equivalent, it is almost an absolute requirement. It is namely much more difficult to correct the trajectory of a fully spin-stabilised body than to carry out an equivalent correction for a fin-stabilised one. As fin-stabilised shells usually have a significantly greater air resistance than corresponding spin-stabilised shells it is usually appropriate, as in the manner indicated above, to allow a shell to begin its trajectory as spin-stabilised and not to go over to fin-stabilising until the shell approaches its target. A number of different design principles already exist for using deployable fins for fin-stabilised projectiles. If the projectile in question during the firing phase as well as during a greater or lesser part of its trajectory is spin-stabilised, the same fins may also be initially utilised to retard the rate of spin of the projectile sufficiently to enable these fms to fin-stabilise the shell in the desired manner. In the purely theoretical type of retractable fins each fin is initially retracted radially in the projectile body or, perhaps more usually, retracted in a dedicated slot or compartment in the projectile body. For the actual deployment function in which the fins flip up or spring up radially there are usually springs incorporated for this purpose. The major disadvantages with this type of fin is that they occupy too much space in the projectile body, and that it is difficult to provide them with sufficient surface area. A type of fin that occupies significantly less space is the type which initially, i.e. prior to deployment, is retracted snugly curved against and around the projectile body and which, after they are exposed by the ejection of a dedicated protector or the opening of a special retaining device or suchlike, flip up primarily as the result of centrifugal forces. (If the shell is of a general type that is fitted with a slipping driving band and thus has little or no direct inherent spin it will be primarily air resistance forces that power fin deployment.) Fins of this type are usually mounted in the projectile so that at deployment they also rotate around a retaining pin located parallel to the longitudinal axis of the projectile after which they are locked in deployed mode. An example of this type of fin, which in its basic form means that the fin retains its convex shape even after deployment, is Swedish patent no. 339646 in which each fin can be comprised of a piece of sheet metal bent convex around its own pivot and deployment pin. With this type of fin the surface area of the fin usually poses no problem, but on the other hand it is essential to protect the fins while in retracted mode from the gas pressure in the barrel during firing of the projectile. If the propellant gas pressure in the barrel during firing penetrates under the fins the force acting on the fins will be so great that they will deploy too early and too rapidly, resulting in their destruction when exiting the muzzle. In the case of a gas-tight but insufficiently strong protector, the protector would be deformed to such an extent that it would be impossible to eject thus disenabling fin deployment. On the other hand, if the fin protector was made sufficiently gas-tight and stable so as to protect the fins completely it would be far too heavy, costly, and occupy too much space. In both the Swedish patents 7908002-4 and 8200312-0 two very similar designs are described for base-bleed shells that are initially spin-stabilised, both incorporating fins of the type indicated above but with a somewhat different detail design wherein both are designed to deploy in conjunction with the ejection of the base-bleed unit, and thus subsequently assume a stabilising function. In both these cases the gas pressure problem during firing has been avoided by locating the fins prior to deployment forward of the driving band, i.e. away from the section of the shell that is subjected to maximum gas pressure. It is, however, not always possible to choose this apparently simple solution to the problem since in reality it is often other criteria that determine where the driving band shall be located along the length of the shell (projectile). As the shell is subjected to its greatest load at the cross-section through the driving band it is usually also necessary to ensure that the shell is extremely resistant to deformation at this point, and it is thus often this requirement that finally determines the location of the driving band. The purpose of the present invention is that for such shells that are fin-stabilised — at least during part of their trajectory — to offer a method and a device to enable the driving band to be located at the optimal position on the shell with regard to general functionality and design without negatively affecting the retracted fins of the shell during the firing phase, which fms are assumed to be convexedly wrapped around the outer periphery of the projectile body and are initially covered by a fin protector. Previously it was standard practice to allow such fins that have a convex shape when retracted around the projectile body to retain their convex form even after deployment. But now that it is possible to obtain material with a sufficiently high degree of elasticity and inherent springback it is possible to manufacture fins which can remain curved against the projectile body in the way indicated above for years, and which still resume an essentially flat shape as soon as they are released/deployed. It is this type of fin to which the present invention primarily relates since it provides certain aerodynamic and other advantages. As a rule the fins of fin-stabilised projectiles are angled a few degrees relative to the longitudinal axis of the projectile to impart an inherent low rate of spin to the fin- stabilised projectile. Such a slight angling of the fins may also be incorporated in the above indicated type where the fins are retracted against the projectile body, and when deployed whose virtually flat form is achieved by the elasticity and good inherent springback of the material. This slight angling of the fins can also be used to provide deployment force to the fins in the case of projectiles fired with low or no spin at all, such as when fired from a smooth-bore barrel. An equivalent angling of the fins can also be achieved by slightly angling the pivot pin of each fin relative to the longitudinal axis of the projectile. A special advantage of this method and device as described in the present invention is that it only requires the fins when retracted to be surrounded by an ejectable fin protector of limited material thickness and mass. The basic idea behind the present invention is that the internal volume of the fin protector that initially surrounds the fins that are retracted snugly curved around the outer periphery of the shell, excluding the space occupied by the fins, shall be completely filled with some sort of appropriate inert, non-combustible or non-glutinous substance with low compressibility and very low inherent strength. For example, there are certain bi- component silicones, including some sold under the name SEALGAARD, that meet these requirements. Another conceivable substance would be a suitable fluid— in the first instance a thixotropic fluid since this would preclude any risk of leakage during depot storage. With even a relatively lightly dimensioned fin protector filled in this way with a virtually non-compressible substance that completely surrounds the retracted fins, the fins are not susceptible to any kind of damage. Naturally, the fin protector must be fully sealed but it is perfectly adequate for it to be made of small gauge (i.e. limited wall thickness) material as it will withstand extremely high external pressure without suffering deformation that would prevent ejection when the time comes and without any deformation of the enclosed fins. The method indicated above for filling the fin protector also prevents the ingress of propellant gases under the fins which would lead to an excessively rapid opening/deployment of the fins. This means in turn that, as previously mentioned, the driving band of the shell can be located at the optimal position irrespective of whether or not the fin protector and the retracted fins inside are located on the section of the shell that is most affected by the propellant gases. According to the present invention deployment of the fins requires only ejection of the fin protector in question after which, depending on the design of the shell and how it is fired, various combinations of the force with which the fins spring out from their retracted mode, centrifugal forces, and air resistance jointly force the fins outwards to their deployed mode while simultaneously slinging the low inherent strength protective substance from the shell body and fins. The method of using an ejectable fin protector to actuate fin deployment also has the advantage that the same function can also be used to remove, for example, a burnt-out or otherwise no longer desirable base-bleed unit. The present invention is defined in the subsequent patent claims, and is described in somewhat more detail in the appended figures in which Figure 1 shows a longitudinal section — immediately after firing — of an artillery shell of the type that could be relevant in connection with the present invention, while Figure 2 shows the same shell after fin deployment, Figure 3 is to a larger scale with more parts visible and shows a longitudinal section through the tail unit of the shell shown in Figure 1, while Figure 4 shows section IV-IN in Figure 3, while Figure 5 shows an enlargement of the circled sector marked in Figure 4, and finally Figure 6 shows an oblique projection of the tail unit of the shell shown in Figure 2, i.e. the aft housing with fin protector removed and all fins deployed. Note that the shell body is not illustrated in this figure. Parts shown on more than one figure have the same designation irrespective of the scale used and the section illustrated. The shell 1 illustrated in the figures is a TCM shell, i.e. a shell whose ballistic trajectory can be corrected while the shell is travelling towards its target (TCM = Trajectory Correctable Munitions). The main parts of the shell 1 are the electronics package 2 containing the electronics required for correcting the trajectory and other functions, a control unit 3 containing a number of propellant-driven thrusters 4 of known type which implement trajectory corrections as commanded by the electronics package, each such thruster incorporating a nozzle 5 which is protected by an ejectable plug 5' until the thruster is fired, a cargo section 6 for accommodating a cargo not described herein, such as bomblets/submunitions, and finally a tail unit 7 containing primarily a base-bleed unit 8, fins 9-13 and their hinge pins 14-18. The base-bleed unit 8 is permanently integrated with the fin protector 19. The shell illustrated in Figures 1 and 2 also incorporates spin-retarding nubs 34. Figures 3 through 6 show the fin protector, fins, and base-bleed unit in more detail. As illustrated in Figure 3, for example, the shell 1 in the example in question has a relatively thin outer casing 20 and a driving band 21 made of copper or equivalent, and is otherwise constructed in accordance with conventional techniques. The relative thinness of the shell 1 body is primarily a direct result of the fact that the shell in question is designed to carry a number of bomblets/submunitions to the intended target, but this factor is of no significance in the context of the present invention. On the other hand, the design of the base-bleed unit 8 and the attached fin protector 19 is important. The base-bleed unit 8 is designed with an internal combustion chamber 22 which initially contains a slow-burning special propellant 22'. The rear (relative to the direction of flight of the shell) wall of the base-bleed unit combustion chamber ends with a flange 23 which is integral with the fin protector 19, which in turn extends forwards in the direction of flight of the shell from the said flange parallel with the outer wall of the base-bleed unit 8. Between this outer wall of the base-bleed unit 8, combustion chamber, and the inside of the fin protector 19 there is a ring-shaped space 24. Initially the base-bleed unit 8 is housed in the designated space 31 in the tail unit 7 of the shell 1. In the figures this space 31 for the base-bleed unit is in a separate aft housing 25 permanently integrated with the outer casing 20 of the shell 1. The said aft housing 25 is similar in shape to a cylindrical can in whose outer rear wall the fms 9-13 are mounted via their hinge pins 14-18. The fins 9-13 are initially retracted against the outer curved surface of the outer wall of the aft housing 25, while those parts of the aft housing 25 in which the fms are mounted are recessed in the above mentioned ring- shaped space 24, and the inner surface of the fin protector 19 closest to the free overlap surface 26 forms a pull-off overlapping seal with the sealing surface 27. The ring-shaped space 24 that is not occupied by the aft housing 25, the fins 9-13 and their hinge pins 14-18 are, in initial mode, filled with the above described inert and low inherent strength substance 32 which has the task of preventing the fin protector and fins from being deformed to such an extent that they can no longer perform their respective functions. The space designated 28 in Figure 3 contains a small base-bleed ejector charge which on command ejects the base-bleed unit 8, thereby also removing the integral fin protector 19. The shear pins 33 shear off when the base-bleed unit is ejected. As shown in Figure 3 the thickness of the homogeneous shell wall where the driving band 21 is located is considerable. The aft wall 8' of the base-bleed unit is similarly reinforced. The homogeneous material in this cross-section is critical as it is precisely this cross-section of the shell which is subjected to the greatest lateral load during firing. Another detail worthy of mention is that the hinge pins of the fins each have two flat surfaces diametrically opposite each other which constitute two locking flats, designated 29 and 30 in Figure 5, radial to the cross-section of the shell. By pre- tensioning the fold of the fins around their respective hinge pins so that the sheet metal of each fin has a spring force that pinches the fold of the fin around each hinge pin, the locking flats provide an elementary but adequate locking of the fins in deployed mode after they have swung out by pivoting around the stationary hinge pins.

Claims: PATENT CLAIMS We hereby claim and desire to secure by Letters Patent the following. 1. A method relating to shells that are fin-stabilised at least during the final part of their trajectory and which are fired from gun barrels, for preventing deformation of the deployable fins (9-13) incorporated in the shell tail unit (7) that is subjected to the full effect of the propellant gas pressure in the barrel during firing, which fins are deployed on command to fin-stabilise the shell (1) and which fins are protected during the firing phase by a fin protector (19) with limited wall thickness that surrounds the rear section of the said shell and which fin protector is ejected at the point in time for fin deployment w h e r e i n the said fin protector (19) is designed to be completely sealed except where it interfaces with the external surface of the shell and where this joint is both sealed and can be decoupled and where the ring-shaped space (24) not occupied by the said fins inside the said fin protector is completely filled with an inert, non-combustible, non-glutinous substance (32) of low compressibility and very low inherent strength. 2. A method as claimed in Claim 1 w h e r e i n the stated substance (32) selected has such properties that after fin deployment none of the said substance is able to remain on the fins (9-13) and exposed shell body. 3. A device as claimed in the method in either Claim 1 or 2 relating to shells (1) that are fin-stabilised at least during the final part of their trajectory and which are fired from gun barrels, for preventing direct or indirect deformation of the deployable fins (9-13) incorporated in the shell tail unit (7) that is subjected to the full effect of the propellant gas pressure in the barrel during firing, which fms are deployed on command to fin-stabilise the shell (1) and which fins are protected during the firing phase by an ejectable fin protector (19) with limited wall thickness which in itself is insufficient to resist the said gas pressure w h e r e i n the said fin protector (19), which is in the form of a sleeve open at the front but completely closed at the rear relative to the direction of flight of the shell and which fin protector surrounds the tail unit in which the fins are mounted until the point in time that it is ejected and the fins (9-13) deploy, is joined with a gas-tight seal to — but is removable from — the shell body forward of the fins in the direction of flight of the shell (1), and that all the free space inside the said fin protector (19) not occupied by the fins (9-13) and related components is completely filled with an inert, non- combustible, non-glutinous substance (32) of low compressibility and very low inherent strength. 4. A device as claimed in Claim 3 w h e r e i n the said fin protector (19) is permanently joined to the shell base-bleed unit (8) so that these two combined units are ejected together. 5. A device as claimed in either Claim 3 or 4 w h e r e i n the base- bleed unit (8) and the fin protector (19) form a combined unit with the first mentioned located in the centre so that a ring-shaped space (24) is formed between the inside of the fin protector (19) and the said base-bleed unit (8), and which space is initially occupied by the rearmost section (i.e. the tail unit) of the shell including the fins (9-13) mounted in the tail unit (7) that are initially retracted convexedly around the outer surface of the said tail unit. 6. A device as claimed in any of the Claims 3 through 5 w h e r e i n the deployable fins (9-13) are made of sheet-metal material with very high elasticity and long-term form memory, each fin being bent around its own hinge pin (14-18) immovably secured longitudinally in the shell body, each said hinge pin incorporating two diametrically opposite longitudinal locking flats (29-30) radially located relative to the cross-section of the shell, while the bending of each fin (9-13) around each hinge pin (14-18) is such that the fin pinches the hinge pin. 7. A device as claimed in any of the Claims 3 through 6 h e r e i n the substance (32) that fills the space inside the fin protector (19) not occupied by the fins etc consists of a bi-component, curing silicon with low inherent strength in cured state. 8. A device as claimed in any of the Claims 3 through 6 wherein the substance (32) that fills the space inside the fin protector (19) not occupied by the fins etc consists of a fluid such as water. 9. A device as claimed in any of the Claims 3 through 6 wherein the substance (32) that fills the space inside the fin protector (19) not occupied by the fins etc consists of a thixotrope with low inherent strength and low compressibility.

Inventors: JOHNSSON STIG, JOHNSSON, STIG
Applicants: BOFORS AB, JOHNSSON STIG, JOHNSSON, STIG
Application year: 1998
Main classification: F42B10
IPC codes: F42B10