Method and apparatus for monitoring the cleaning performance to predict cleaner life

Abstract: A method, apparatus and printing machine are disclosed that contain a monitoring system that includes a sensor (200) and artificial stress conditions generating means (e.g. means for providing a toner patch) to determine the cleaner brush life. A comparative analysis is performed from the data provided by the monitoring system of a normal cleaning residual toner particle mass and artificial stress conditions cleaning residual toner particle mass to predict brush cleaner (100,110) life reliably.

Description: This invention relates generally to an electrostatographic printer or copier, and more particularly, a cleaner and a method to monitor cleaning performance and to predict cleaner life. Brush cleaners operate by removing the toner from the photoreceptor both with mechanical and/or electrostatic forces. The fibers on the brush touch the untransferred toner and the toner is removed from the photoreceptor onto the brush. The toner on the brush is then transported to a detoning device (e.g. flicker bar, detoning roll, air system, combs, etc.) removing the toner from the brush (i.e. detoned). An electrostatic brush cleaner removes the toner primarily with electrostatic forces. For a dual electrostatic brush cleaner, negative toner is removed with a positively biased brush and positive toner is removed with a negatively biased brush. Dual electrostatic brush cleaners are used in high volume full color single pass IOI (Image on Image) printers. Unreliable predictions of cleaning performance failure in a cleaning system causes down time and customer dissatisfaction. A highly reliable method or apparatus of predicting cleaner performance is needed, especially in high volume full color single pass lOl printers. Down time could be minimized by the ability to accurately predict cleaner brush life. The following disclosures may be relevant to various aspects of the present invention and may be briefly summarized as follows: US-A-5,546, 177 to Thayer discloses a method and apparatus for monitoring the performance of a cleaner brush used to clean a photoreceptive surface. The apparatus and method include developing a toner patch of known first length on the imaging surface and then removing that toner patch from the imaging surface using a cleaner brush that accumulates a toner patch of a second length on the surface of the brush. The comparison of the toner patch on the imaging surface versus the toner patch on the brush surface monitor the cleaning efficiency of the cleaner brush. Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 008, No. 006 (P-247), 12 January 1984 - JP 58169155A (Fujitsu) describes an electrophotographic printing device, whereby a mark with toner is formed on an image forming material and the density of the mark remaining after cleaning is detected by a detector device. Artificial stress conditions, related to operational characteristics of the cleaner system are not disclosed. It is the object of the present invention to improve monitoring of cleaning performance in electrostatographic printers. This object is achieved by providing a method according to claim 1 and an apparatus according to claim 7. Other features of the present invention will become apparent as the following description proceeds and upon reference to the drawings, in which: Figure 1 is an elevational schematic of a prior art dual cleaner brush system designed to remove the majority of the toner particles from the photoreceptor with the first cleaner brush; Figure 2 is an elevational schematic of an embodiment of the present invention showing a cleaner performance monitoring system; Figure 3 is a graphical depiction of brush life using the present invention; and Figure 4 is a schematic illustration of a printing apparatus incorporating the inventive features of the present invention. While the present invention will be described in connection with a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to that embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For a general understanding of a color electrostatographic printing or copying machine in which the present invention may be incorporated, reference is made to U.S. Patents 4,599,285 and 4,679,929, which describe the image on image process having multi-pass development with single pass transfer. Although the cleaning method and apparatus of the present invention is particularly well adapted for use in a color electrostatographic printing or copying machine, it should become evident from the following discussion, that it is equally well suited for use in a wide variety of devices and is not necessarily limited to the particular embodiments shown herein. Referring now to the drawings, where the showings are for the purpose of describing a preferred embodiment of the invention and not for limiting same, the various processing stations employed in the reproduction machine illustrated in Figure 4 will be briefly described. A reproduction machine, from which the present invention finds advantageous use, utilizes a charge retentive member in the form of the photoconductive belt 10 consisting of a photoconductive surface and an electrically conductive, light transmissive substrate mounted for movement past charging station A, and exposure station B, developer stations C, transfer station D, fusing station E and cleaning station F. Belt 10 moves in the direction of arrow 16 to advance successive portions thereof sequentially through the various processing stations disposed about the path of movement thereof. Belt 10 is entrained about a plurality of rollers 18, 20 and 22, the former of which can be used to provide suitable tensioning of the photoreceptor belt 10. Motor 23 rotates roller 20 to advance belt 10 in the direction of arrow 16. Roller 20 is coupled to motor 23 by suitable means such as a belt drive. As can be seen by further reference to Figure 4, initially successive portions of belt 10 pass through charging station A. At charging station A, a corona device such as a scorotron, corotron or dicorotron indicated generally by the reference numeral 24, charges the belt 10 to a selectively high uniform positive or negative potential. Any suitable control, well known in the art, may be employed for controlling the corona device 24. Next, the charged portions of the photoreceptor surface are advanced through exposure station B. At exposure station B, the uniformly charged photoreceptor or charge retentive surface 10 is exposed to a laser based input and/or output scanning device 25 which causes the charge retentive surface to be discharged in accordance with the output from the scanning device (for example, a two level Raster Output Scanner (ROS)). The photoreceptor, which is initially charged to a voltage, undergoes dark decay to a voltage level. When exposed at the exposure station B it is discharged to near zero or ground potential for the image area in all colors. At development station C, a development system, indicated generally by the reference numeral 30, advances development materials into contact with the electrostatic latent images. The development system 30 comprises first 42, second 40, third 34 and fourth 32 developer apparatuses. (However, this number may increase or decrease depending upon the number of colors, i.e. here four colors are referred to, thus, there are four developer housings.) The first developer apparatus 42 comprises a housing containing a donor roll 47, a magnetic roller 48, and developer material 46. The second developer apparatus 40 comprises a housing containing a donor roll 43, a magnetic roller 44, and developer material 45. The third developer apparatus 34 comprises a housing containing a donor roll 37, a magnetic roller 38, and developer material 39. The fourth developer apparatus 32 comprises a housing containing a donor roll 35, a magnetic roller 36, and developer material 33. The magnetic rollers 36, 38, 44, and 48 develop toner onto donor rolls 35, 37, 43 and 47, respectively. The donor rolls 35, 37, 43, and 47 then develop the toner onto the imaging surface 11. It is noted that development housings 32, 34, 40, 42, and any subsequent development housings must be scavengeless so as not to disturb the image formed by the previous development apparatus. All four housings contain developer material 33, 39, 45, 46 of selected colors. Electrical biasing is accomplished via power supply 41, electrically connected to developer apparatuses 32, 34, 40 and 42. Sheets of substrate or support material 58 are advanced to transfer station D from a supply tray, not shown. Sheets are fed from the tray by a sheet feeder, also not shown, and advanced to transfer station D through a corona charging device 60. After transfer, the sheet continues to move in the direction of arrow 62, to fusing station E. Fusing station E includes a fuser assembly, indicated generally by the reference numeral 64, which permanently affixes the transferred toner powder images to the sheets. Preferably, fuser assembly 64 includes a heated fuser roller 66 adapted to be pressure engaged with a back-up roller 68 with the toner powder images contacting fuser roller 66. In this manner, the toner powder image is permanently affixed to the sheet. After fusing, copy sheets are directed to a catch tray, not shown, or a finishing station for binding, stapling, collating, etc., and removal from the machine by the operator. Alternatively, the sheet may be advanced to a duplex tray (not shown) from which it will be returned to the processor for receiving a second side copy. A lead edge to trail edge reversal and an odd number of sheet inversions is generally required for presentation of the second side for copying. However, if overlay information in the form of additional or second color information is desirable on the first side of the sheet, no lead edge to trail edge reversal is required. Of course, the return of the sheets for duplex or overlay copying may also be accomplished manually. Residual toner and debris remaining on photoreceptor belt 10 after each copy is made, may be removed at cleaning station F with a brush, blade or other type of cleaning system 70. A preclean corotron 161 is located upstream from the cleaning system 70. Reference is now made to Figure 1, which shows the prior art of a dual electrostatic brush cleaner. The toner particles used in a DAD (Discharge Area Development) xerographic process are shown here as negatively charged. The majority of the toner particles 120 are charged negative after transfer by the preclean corotron 161. The first brush 100, in the direction of motion of the photoreceptor 10, is biased positive to remove the majority (over ∼90%) of the toner particles 120. The rest of the toner particles are removed by the second brush 110, located downstream from the first brush 100 in the direction of motion of the photoreceptor 10. The second brush 110 is negatively biased. The brushes 100, 110 rotate in the direction of the arrows 101, 111. Biasing the first brush 100 with a polarity opposite that of the toner particles 120 enables removal of the majority of the residual toner after transfer on the photoreceptor 10. The second brush 110 removes wrong sign toner that was not removed by the first brush 100. The cleaning of the photoreceptor 10 is greatly affected by the biases on both cleaner brushes 100, 110. The present invention proposes monitoring the cleaner performance under artificial stress conditions that include, but are not limited to, changing brush biases and toner input to determine the photoreceptor cleaning. As a cleaner brush ages, removal of toner particles 120 from the photoreceptor 10 under stress conditions degrade and become detectable before normal cleaning becomes unacceptable. Evaluating cleaning performance under these stress conditions, using the present invention, determines when an actual cleaning failure under nominal conditions will occur prior to the observance of the actual failure by the customer. Thus, enabling corrective measures to occur before failure. Reference is now made to Figure 2 which shows an artificially stressed cleaner system and an embodiment of the present invention. In order to evaluate the cleaner under stress conditions, a sensor after the cleaner can be used to check for photoreceptor cleaning. This sensor could be an ETAC (i.e., Enhanced Toner Area Coverage) sensor. The ETAC sensor 200, ideally, would be located immediately after the cleaner as shown in Figure 2. The ETAC sensor 200 measures the amount of toner particles on the photoreceptor 10 using reflected infra-red light. This ETAC sensor 200 can detect even very small amounts of residual toner 199 not cleaned by the cleaner system. To avoid the cost of adding an additional ETAC sensor 200 in printing machines that already use a sensor, a single ETAC sensor located in the machine could be used for multiple purposes. For purposes of the present invention, the ETAC sensor monitors the development performance and can also be used to monitor cleaner performance. Using an ETAC sensor 200 may require a temporary decrease in the print rate, if the stress condition is located on the charge retentive surface panel used for printing. If the stress condition was located in the interdocument gap, cleaning in the interdocument gap could be evaluated during normal run conditions and without decreasing the machine productivity. Thus, the artificial stress condition can be located in the printing area or the interdocument area of the photoreceptor. Stressing the cleaner and determining the performance requires testing to correlate cleaning failures. A high DMA (Developed Mass per unit Area) untransferred control patch provides cleaning stress to the cleaner. The present invention is utilized in making the following analysis: if a stress patch 190 (e.g. a dense or solid patch of toner particles) is cleaned by the cleaner system under the normal cleaning conditions (e.g. a first brush biased with opposite polarity than the toner charge, second brush biased with opposite polarity than the first brush), then the first cleaner brush 100, which does the majority of the cleaning, is working effectively. In this embodiment of the present invention, the ETAC sensor 200 compares the photoreceptor belt reading of the stress input area to a background area. If the stress patch 190 is not removed from the photoreceptor 10, then the first brush 100 cleaning capability is decreasing. To determine how bad the cleaning is, the second brush 110 operating parameters can be changed. The second brush bias can be switched to the same polarity as the first brush bias to essentially double the cleaning capability. (For example, in Figure 1, the second brush 110 bias would be changed from negative to positive to match the polarity of the first brush 100.) The ETAC sensor 200 then compares the post cleaner stress patch 199, reading between the +/- (first brush bias positive and second brush bias negative) and the +/+ (both brushes biased positive) operation modes. If there is a large difference, the first cleaning brush 100 is nearing the end of its brush life. Reference is now made to Figure 3 which illustrates a graph for monitoring the cleaning system and determining when a cleaning brush failure occurs. The graph shows the difference in RMA (i.e., residual mass per unit area which is the toner remaining on the photoreceptor after transfer) on the vertical axis and points to failure on the horizontal axis. When the difference between the stress and nominal cleaning residual mass is large (point A on the graph), the cleaner brush is near the end of its brush life with approximately 45 kprint remaining. When the difference in cleaning is small (the first brush is doing all the cleaning represented by point B), the cleaner brush is not near the end of life (-290 kprints remaining). Other stress conditions to evaluate the cleaner performance of the cleaning system besides changing the second brush bias from negative to positive include: turning the bias of the second brush off (i.e. +/0 cleaner); disabling the second brush drive; changing the preclean corotron current (e.g. the toner could be charged to a higher average negative charge to stress the positive brush or the preclean current could be changed to positive for a short period of time to predict the second brush life); changing the brush rotational speed; or decreasing the brush biases for both brushes could be decreased to reduce the electrical forces. Any of these combinations would stress the cleaner and the sensor would determine the degradation in cleaning prior to a failure. Software applications would be used to change the cleaner settings and monitor photoreceptor cleaning. In recapitulation, the present invention utilizes a monitoring system that includes a sensor and artificial stress conditions to determine the cleaner brush life. A comparative analysis is performed from the data provided by the monitoring system of a normal cleaning residual mass and artificial stress conditions cleaning residual mass to predict brush cleaner life reliably.

Claims: A method for monitoring performance of a cleaner system removing particles from a surface of a photoreceptor (10), under artificial stress conditions to determine brush life, comprising: enabling a monitoring member (200) of the cleaner system, the monitoring member (200) being in a monitoring relationship to the photoreceptor (10); creating a control patch (190) containing toner on the surface of the photoreceptor to provide cleaning stress to the cleaner system; running the cleaner system to remove the control patch from the surface of the photoreceptor (10) under artificial stress conditions related to operational characteristics of the cleaner system; and using the monitoring member to determine a level of cleaning performance under the artificial stress conditions. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of: collecting data on the level of cleaning performance under the artificial stress conditions from the monitoring member (200) for comparative analysis; and disabling the monitoring member (200) to proceed with another printing run. A method according to claims 1 or 2, further comprising the step of comparing data on the level of cleaning performance of the cleaner system under the artificial stress conditions to data obtained from monitoring the level of cleaning performance of the cleaner system under normal conditions to determine a failure mode for the cleaner system. A method according to claims 1 to 3, whereby the control patch (190) is created in a non-printing area of the photoreceptor. A method according to claim 4, wherein the non-printing area on the surface of the photoreceptor comprises an interdocument area located between two imaging areas of the photoreceptor. A method according to any one of the claims 4 to 5, wherein the non-printing area of the photoreceptor comprises a portion of an imaging surface not being utilized at time of monitoring performance of the cleaner system. An apparatus for removing particles from a photoreceptor (10), comprising: cleaning means (100, 110) for cleaning particles from the photoreceptor (10); means for creating a control patch (190) containing toner on the surface of the photoreceptor to provide cleaning stress to the cleaning means ; means for providing artificial stress conditions related to operational characteristics of the cleaning means (100, 110); a monitoring system (200) to determine a level of cleaning performance of said cleaning means under artificial stress conditions whereby the. monitoring system (200) is in monitoring relationship to the photoreceptor (10). An apparatus according to claim 7, further comprising: means for retrieving data from the monitoring system (200) on the level of cleaning performance under the artificial stress conditions for comparative analysis. An apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the comparative analysis compares data from the monitoring system (200) on the level of cleaning performance of said cleaning means under the artificial stress conditions to data from the monitoring system (200) on the level of cleaning performance of said cleaning means under normal conditions to determine said cleaning means life. An apparatus according to any of the claims 7 to 9, wherein the control patch (190) comprises toner particles developed in a non-printing area of the photoreceptor (10). An apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the non-printing area of the photoreceptor (10) comprises an interdocument area located between two imaging areas on the photoreceptor (10). An apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the non-printing area of the photoreceptor (10) comprises a portion of an imaging area of the photoreceptor having no latent image during measurement of cleaning performance of said cleaning means under artificial stress conditions by said monitoring system.

Inventors: DANIELS MATTHEW P, GERBASI DENNIS G, PRENTISS THOMAS A, STOOKEY DAVID R, TEICH JAMES J, THAYER BRUCE E, WAGNER MORITZ P, WEBER RALPH J, DANIELS, MATTHEW P., GERBASI, DENNIS G., PRENTISS, THOMAS A., STOOKEY, DAVID R., TEICH, JAMES J., THAYER, BRUCE E., WAGNER, MORITZ P., WEBER, RALPH J.
Applicants: XEROX CORP, XEROX CORPORATION
Application year: 1998
Main classification: G03G21
IPC codes: G03G21