Resolving power evaluation method for electron microscope

Abstract: An electron microscope resolving power evaluation method of evaluating performance of a scanning electron microscope without resorting to visual sensory analysis for minimizing a difference in deterioration with age and in performance among individual scanning electron microscopes. A specimen (1, 21a-e, 51, 61) is prepared by overlying materials (23a-b, 52-54) having different emission coefficients of such secondary charged particles as secondary electrons, backscattered electrons, transmitted electrons, etc., a cross-section (22) including an overlaid material part of thin-film layers (23a-b, 52-54) having known dimensions is mirror-finished, data of a scanning electron microscopical image of the cross-section including the overlaid material part is attained, and then resolving power performance of the scanning electron microscope is evaluated quantitatively by means of frequency analysis, etc.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method of evaluating electron microscope resolving power. Description of Related Art Conventionally, resolving power performance of an electron microscope is evaluated using a distance between two points visible on a specimen. In Japanese Non-examined Patent Publication No. 45265/1993, there is disclosed an electron microscope resolving power evaluation method in which a gold-particle-evaporated carbon specimen is observed on an electron microscope and resolving power thereof is determined based on a minimum space distance between two gold particles. Besides, electron microscope resolution performance is evaluated based on a degree of blurring on a particle boundary. In the conventional resolving power evaluation method using gold-particle images observed on an electron microscope, there are variations in size and shape of gold particles to cause differences in results of measurement among individual analysts and identical specimens are not reproducible, making it difficult to practice accurate quantitative evaluation of resolving power. Furthermore, no method is available for accurately measuring a space distance between gold particles under electron microscope observation, and there is an instrumental error in resolving power among individual electron microscopes. Therefore, in semiconductor device fabrication where dimensions of circuit patterns on a semiconductor device are measured using a plurality of electron microscopes, an observed image of each semiconductor device may differ among electron microscopes, resulting in such a problem that a defect is observable or not observable depending on the electron microscope employed. As a consequence, it is not allowed to implement semiconductor device fabrication based on predetermined consistent control value data. The book "Raster-Elektronenmikroskopie", 1973, Springer, Berlin by Reimer and Pfefferkorn describes a resolution test at surface steps formed by etching. Further, material contrast and particularly contrast by variation of backscattering coeffcience on a plane surface of an object is addressed. Under this condition a material contrast caused by a Z-dependency of the backscattering coefficient may be utilized unambiguously. US 4 068 381 discloses a scanning electron microscope micrometer scale and a method for fabricating the same. A multilayer structure is manufactured and cut into samples. The exposed edge is ground and metallographically polished. A microscopic indentation is made in_the substrate near a first gold layer. The indentation defines a reference region, and the distances to subsequent gold layers are measured. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is therefore an object of the present invention to overcome the abovementioned disadvantages by providing an electron microscope resolving power evaluation method including preparing a specimen therefore. In accomplishing this object of the present invention, there is prepared a multi-thin-film-layered specimen which is advantageous in that arbitrary thickness and combination of film materials are permitted, instead of a gold-particle-evaporated carbon specimen employed in the conventional resolving power evaluation method, and there is provided a numeric processor incorporated in an electron microscope for performance evaluation. For use in evaluation, each multi-thin-film-layered specimen is analyzed in a depth direction thereof by means of X ray or the like, and cleft along a cross-section thereof having accurate known dimensions. Each multi-thin-film-layered specimen is prepared using a combination of materials which are significantly different in atomic number, e.g., a combination of tantalum and silicon, so that step signals or square wave signals having different frequencies can be attained in specimen surface image scanning on the electron microscope. In this case, an electron beam profile is provided through differentiation on data corresponding to the step signals attained in specimen surface image scanning on the electron microscope, and a diameter and shape of electron beam can be evaluated quantitatively by setting such a threshold as a half-value width. Furthermore, but not being part of the claimed invention, quantitative evaluation of resolution can be made through calculation of contrast or other data corresponding to the square wave signals. In addition, by applying an optical resolution limit determination method, electron microscope resolution can be calculated using Rayleigh criterion of resolution on a two-slit-pattern image. On a plurality of electron microscopes where such a specimen as mentioned above is mounted, it is possible to provide identical resolving power/resolution by adjusting a focusing voltage or other instrumental parameters of each electron microscope. This enables image observation under identical conditions among different models of electron microscopes. More specifically, according to the present invention, there is provided a quantitative evaluation method of electron microscope resolving power in which a specimen is prepared by overlaying materials having different emission coefficients of such secondary charged particles as secondary electrons, backscattered electrons, transmitted electrons, etc., a cross-section including an overlaid material part of the specimen is irradiated with an electron beam to attain a secondary charged particle image of the cross-section of the specimen by detecting secondary charged particles emitted therefrom, and quantitative evaluation of electron microscope resolving power is performed using the secondary charged particle image thus attained. In specimen preparation, a thin film of a material which is different from that of a substrate in emission coefficient of such secondary charged particles as secondary electrons, backscattered electrons and transmitted electrons is formed on the substrate. Still more, in specimen preparation, thin films of plural materials having different emission coefficients of such secondary charged particles as secondary electrons, backscattered electrons and transmitted electrons are laminated on a substrate. Further, there is described an electron microscope resolving power evaluation specimen which comprises a resolving power evaluation cross-section including an overlaid part of two or more materials having different emission coefficients of such secondary charged particles as secondary electrons, backscattered electrons and transmitted electrons. Furthermore, there is described an electron microscope resolving power evaluation specimen which includes formed thin films of two or more materials having different emission coefficients of such secondary charged particles as secondary electrons, backscattered electrons and transmitted electrons. Moreover, there is described an electron microscope resolving power evaluation specimen which includes laminated thin films of plural materials having different emission coefficients of such secondary charged particles as secondary electrons, backscattered electrons and transmitted electrons. Besides, there is described an electron microscope adjustment method in which a specimen is prepared by laminating materials having different emission coefficients of such secondary charged particles as secondary electrons, backscattered electrons and transmitted electrons, a cross-section including a laminated part of the specimen is irradiated with an electron beam in an electron microscope to attain a secondary charged particle image of the cross-section of the specimen by detecting secondary charged particles emitted therefrom, evaluation of resolving power of the electron microscope is performed using the secondary charged particle image thus attained, and an electron optical system, vacuum system or electron gun of the electron microscope is adjusted according to evaluation result of resolving power thereof. The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description of embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of a scanning electron microscope; FIG. 2 shows an example of a performance evaluation specimen comprising two layers; FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic illustration of a performance evaluation method using the specimen shown in FIG. 2; FIG. 4 shows an example of a performance evaluation specimen in which one thin film is sandwiched between two layers; FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic illustration of a performance evaluation method using the specimen shown in FIG. 4; FIG. 6 shows an example of a performance evaluation specimen in which two thin films are sandwiched in three layers; FIG. 7 is a diagrammatic illustration of a performance evaluation method using the specimen shown in FIG. 6; FIG. 8 shows an example of a performance evaluation specimen in which films are formed in a stripe pattern; FIG. 9 is a diagrammatic illustration showing a performance evaluation method based on frequency analysis; FIG. 10 is a diagrammatic illustration showing a performance evaluation specimen comprising films striped at intervals of 10 nm and a result of imaging thereof; FIG. 11 is a diagrammatic illustration showing a performance evaluation specimen comprising films striped at intervals of 20 nm and a result of imaging thereof; FIG. 12 is a SEM resolving power evaluation chart; FIG. 13 shows an example of a performance evaluation specimen configuration; FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram showing a specimen stage; FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram showing an electrical heating specimen holder; FIG. 16 shows a configuration and SEM image of a specimen in which metallic materials having different emission coefficients of secondary electrons are laminated at different dimensional intervals; FIG. 17 shows another example of a configuration of a specimen in which metallic materials having different emission coefficients of secondary electrons are laminated at different dimensional intervals; FIG. 18 shows a Fourier-transform image of a resolution evaluation specimen; FIG. 19 shows a SEM image profile which is attained through Fourier transformation and then inverse transformation using a bandpass filter; and FIG. 20 is a graph showing a SEM resolving power evaluation curve. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention will now be described in detail by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings. Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown a schematic structural diagram of a scanning electron microscope (SEM) foreseen for resolving power evaluation according to the present invention. An electron optical system of the SEM comprises an electron gun 13, a deflector 12, an electromagnetic lens 14, etc. An electron beam 8 emitted from the electron gun 13 at a desired accelerating voltage is converged through the electromagnetic lens 14, and the electron beam thus converged is scanned over a surface of a specimen 1 mounted on an X-Y-Z stage 17 in an arbitrary sequence by means of the deflector 12, etc. Further, secondary electrons or backscattered electrons emitted from the surface of the specimen 1 irradiated with the electron beam are detected by a detector 15, and image data attained through detection is fed to an image input device 16. The specimen 1 under observation can be moved in any three-dimensional direction on the X-Y-Z stage 17. In synchronization of movement of the X-Y-Z stage, electron beam irradiation and image data input are performed, and stage movement is controlled under direction of a control computer 20. While the SEM shown in FIG. 1 uses a secondary electron image for specimen observation, it is also possible to use an image attained with backscattered electrons, transmitted electrons, etc. Detection of transmitted electrons is implemented by means of a technique known as STEM. The following describes a specimen 21 for SEM resolving power evaluation. In preparation of the specimen 21, thin films of materials which are significantly different in atomic number, e.g., Ta film and Si film, W film and C film, Ru film and C film, Mo film and B4C film, W film and Si film, etc. are laminated alternately to form multiple layers on a single-crystal silicon substrate through film-thickness-controlled processing by means of such a well-known thin film forming technique as plating, CVD (chemical vapor deposition), PVD (physical vapor deposition), etc., and the substrate having multi-layered thin films is cleft to provide a surface of a cross-section 22 for observation. In imaging the cross-section 22, a difference in secondary electron emission coefficient between film materials makes it possible to form an appreciably contrasted image, e.g., Ta, W, Ru and Mo films having a high emission coefficient of secondary electrons appear to be white, and Si, C, and B4C films having a low emission coefficient of secondary electrons appear to be black. For attaining a cross-section of multi-layered thin films of these materials, a technique using a cleavage plane is known (a crystal mineral material is liable to fracture in a certain orientation to make a smooth cleavage plane appear). If a degree of surface roughness of the cross-section 22 is relatively large with respect to a level of resolving power to be evaluated, the following treatment is made, for example; polishing particles of less than 100 nm in diameter are buried in a tin surface plate, and the cross-section 22 is polished on the tin surface plate so that the degree of surface roughness of the cross-section 22 will be on the order of less than a few nm. In examination of SEM resolving power, a specimen 21a shown in FIG. 2 is used for example. A convergent spot of electron beam 8 emitted from the electron gun 13 at a desired accelerating voltage is scanned over a surface of a cross-section 22 containing a layer of Ta 23a and a layer of Si 23b, each having a thickness that is sufficiently larger than a diameter of the convergent spot of electron beam 8, beam 8, e.g., approx. 100 nm. In this scanning, an electron beam energy distribution 31 and a secondary electron intensity 32a detected by the detector 15 for input to the image input device 16 are provided as shown in FIG. 3. Using a signal of the secondary electron intensity 32a supplied from the image input device 16, a numeric processor 19 acquires a differential signal 33 through differentiation, and according to the differential signal 33, it can identify a start-of-scan point 35s and an end-of-scan point 35e of the electron beam spot on a boundary 24 between the Ta layer 23a and Si layer 23b. Then, the numeric processor 19 calculates a difference between the two points 35s and 35e to determine a diameter of the electron beam spot. For determination of an electron beam diameter, the numeric processor 19 uses a half-value width 1 of a curve 33 drawn through differentiation of variations in secondary electron output. Since a value of electron beam diameter is assumed to be equivalent to that of resolving power, quantitative evaluation of SEM performance can be carried out according to it. Furthermore, by approximating the secondary electron intensity 32a through B-spline approximation or approximating the differential signal 33 through normal distribution function approximation, a signal noise component level can be reduced to enable measurement of an electron beam diameter with satisfactory reproducibility. In this case, it is not always necessary to laminate the Si layer 23b and the Ta layer 23a alternately on the Si substrate in film deposition process, i.e., a plurality of any materials having significantly different emission coefficients of secondary electrons may be laminated by means of compression or adhesion. The following describes a method of SEM resolving power measurement not being part of the claimed invention using a specimen 21b shown in FIG. 4. In preparation of the specimen 21b, for example, a thin layer of Ta 23a having a thickness of approx. 1 nm is sandwiched between Si layers 23b, each having a thickness that is sufficiently larger than a diameter of electron beam, and a cross-section of these layers is used for observation. When a convergent spot of electron beam emitted from the electron gun 13 at a desired accelerating voltage is scanned over a surface of a cross-section 22 of the specimen 21b, an electron beam energy distribution 31 and a secondary electron intensity 32b detected by the detector 15 for input to the image input device 16 are provided as shown in FIG. 5. By subtracting a value of background (secondary electron intensity attained from the Si layer 23b) from a curve of secondary electron output, the numeric processor 19 can identify a start-of-scan point 35s and an end-of-scan point 35e of the electron beam spot on the Ta layer. Then, the numeric processor 19 subtracts a film thickness of Ta from a difference between the two points 35s and 35e to determine a diameter of the electron beam spot. As in the case of using the specimen 21a shown in FIG. 2, for determination of an electron beam diameter, the numeric processor 19 may also calculate a half-value width 2 and then subtract a film thickness of Ta from it. In this case, by providing different film thicknesses of thin Ta layer, e.g., 0.5 nm, 2 nm, and 3 nm, a secondary electron emission intensity can be changed. Thus, the numeric processor 19 can determine an energy distribution of electron beam with high accuracy. The following describes a method of SEM resolving power/resolution measurement not being part of the claimed invention using a specimen 21c shown in FIG. 6. In scanning the specimen 21c which has a pattern containing thin white slits 23a on black background 23b as indicated in FIG. 6, it is possible to attain a signal of emission intensity through diffraction pattern imaging similarly to observation of two pinholes on a general optical system. In optics, Rayleigh limit of resolution is defined as found in "Wave Optics" (Hadou Kogaku) - p. 359 to 377, published by Iwanami Shoten, and when a minimum value of a center part of such a signal is less than 74% of a maximum value, two pinhole images are assumed to be detectably separated. For applying the definition of Rayleigh limit of resolution to SEM performance evaluation, the specimen 21c is prepared which has a pattern containing thin white slits 23a on black background 23b (stripe pattern containing white slit layers of Ta on black background layers of Si, for example). In preparation of the specimen 21c, an interval of slits corresponding to a thickness of each striped film is controlled to be a desired value of resolving power, i.e., it is controlled to be 1 nm for SEM adjustment to provide resolving power of 1 nm. As shown in FIG. 7, the numeric processor 19 subtracts a value of background (secondary electron intensity attained from a layer of Si 23b) from a maximum value and a minimum value of a center part of a secondary electron intensity variation signal 32c attained in SEM imaging of the specimen 21c. For instance, if a ratio of minimum to maximum values is 74%, a value of resolving power or resolution limit can be defined as 1 nm. Using a specimen having such a configuration as mentioned above, it is possible to change a level of resolving power under evaluation by changing an interval between slits. Furthermore, for individual SEM instruments possessing different resolving powers or resolution limits, quantification can be made by means of a specimen as shown in FIG. 13 which is prepared to provide different sets of slit intervals in the manner mentioned above. Thus, the numeric processor 19 can carry out quantitative evaluation of resolving power/resolution limit using data attained from a certain specimen having predetermined slit intervals. More specifically, if a performance evaluation chart is prepared as shown in FIG. 12 through relating quantitative resolving power/resolution limit data by means of function approximation, etc., the numeric processor 19 can quantitatively evaluate resolving power/resolution limit using data of minimum and maximum values measured on the specimen having slit intervals of 1 nm, for example. The following describes a method of Fourier-transform frequency analysis on an image of a specimen 21d shown in FIG. 8 for SEM resolution measurement, the method not being part of the claimed invention. SEM image data of the specimen 21d comprising multiple thin films arranged to provide an equally spaced stripe pattern as shown in FIG. 8 is supplied to the numeric processor 19, in which one-dimensional or two-dimensional Fourier transformation is then performed. FIG. 9 shows a graph indicating a relationship between stripe-pattern frequency and signal intensity with respect to a power spectrum attained through Fourier transformation. Note that the origin where a DC component is maximized corresponds to zero in frequency. In this graph, the frequency on abscissa increases leftward and rightward from the origin at center. Using a peak signal intensity at stripe-pattern frequency, the numeric processor 19 can carry out quantitative evaluation of resolution. Still more, the numeric processor 19 can quantitatively evaluate resolution using a ratio or difference between a signal intensity of DC component and a stripe-pattern peak signal intensity. That is, resolution becomes better as the stripe-pattern peak signal intensity increases toward the signal intensity of DC component. Through imaging the specimen 21d shown in FIG. 8 for SEM resolution measurement, it is also possible to determine a value of CTF (contrast transfer function). In this case, quantitative evaluation of resolution can be performed using the following expression; (maxL-minL) / (maxL+minL) × 100 (%), where 'maxL' indicates a maximum luminance value of a stripe-pattern part of image data of the specimen, and 'minL' indicates a minimum luminance value thereof. For the specimen shown in FIG. 8, each white part 23a of its SEM image appears to expand uniformly under electron optical condition of a constant magnification and a constant accelerating voltage as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11. For instance, at a constant electron optical magnification and a constant accelerating voltage, if a white part 23a of a SEM image of a specimen having a pattern striped at intervals of 10 nm appears to expand to 14 nm, a white part 23a of a SEM image of a specimen having a pattern striped at intervals of 20 nm appears to expand to 24 nm. Since a degree of expansion is identical as mentioned above, resolution can be defined accordingly, i.e., a value of 4 nm can be defined as resolution in the above example. Referring to FIG. 13, there is shown an example of a specimen prepared for resolving power/resolution evaluation. On this specimen, stripe patterns shown in FIGS. 2, 4, 6 and 8 are arranged to allow evaluation of resolving power/resolution in a plurality of methods without the need for specimen replacement. Referring to FIG. 14, there is shown a specimen stage/holder 24 for mounting the specimen 1 or the resolving power evaluation specimen 21. In semiconductor device inspection, for example, the specimen stage/holder 24 having a square shape on which a circular wafer is mounted provides unoccupied areas at four corners thereof. At any of these four corner positions, a specimen holder 41 shown in FIG. 15 is mounted. On the specimen holder 41, the specimen 21 is sandwiched between electrode parts for electrical connection. In use of an ordinary specimen holder, once the specimen 21 is subjected to SEM imaging, it cannon be used again due to charge buildup or surface contamination incurred during observation. However, charge buildup and surface contamination can be removed by electrically heating the specimen 21 to 1000 deg. C or higher, for example, resulting in reduction in the number of specimen replacements or elimination of specimen replacement. Referring to FIG. 16, there is shown a configuration of a specimen 51 prepared for resolving power evaluation. In preparation of the specimen 51, W films 53 and C films 54 are laminated on a Si wafer 52. More specifically, in a dimensional interval A 55, C films 54 each having a thickness of 6 nm and W films 53 each having a thickness of 3 to 10 nm are laminated repetitively. In a dimensional interval B 56, C films 54 each having a thickness of 5 nm and W films 53 each having a thickness of 3 to 10 nm are laminated repetitively. Then, in a dimensional interval C 57, C films 54 each having a thickness of 4 nm and W films 53 each having a thickness to 3 to 10 nm are laminated repetitively. It is obvious to those skilled in the art that a thickness of each W film 53 is not necessarily 3 to 10 nm. In SEM observation of the specimen 51, its SEM image is displayed on display means 30, i.e., the display means 30 presents a SEM image 58 shown in FIG. 16. In the dimensional interval 57 on the SEM image 58, although C films 54 each having a thickness of 4 nm are laminated, each white image part of W film 53 appears to expand to disable observation of each dark image part of C film 54. This signifies that the SEM under evaluation is capable of distinguishing a dimension of 5 nm separately but not capable of detectably separating a dimension of 4 nm. Thus, by means of specimen observation, resolving power of the SEM under evaluation is found to be 5 nm. The following describes a method of SEM resolving power measurement not being part of the claimed invention using a specimen 61 shown in FIG. 17 without using the performance evaluation chart shown in FIG. 12. In preparation of the specimen 61, for example, Ru films 63 and C films 64 are laminated on a Si wafer 62. More specifically, in a dimensional interval A 65, C films 64 each having a thickness of 10 nm and Ru films 63 each having a thickness of 3 to 10 nm are laminated repetitively. In a dimensional interval B 66, C films each having a thickness of 6 nm and Ru films 63 each having a thickness of 3 to 10 nm are laminated repetitively. Then, in a dimensional interval C 67, C films each having a thickness of 5 nm and Ru films 63 each having a thickness of 3 to 10 nm are laminated repetitively. It is obvious to those skilled in the art that a thickness of each Ru film 63 is not necessarily 3 to 10 nm. In a situation where a SEM image of the specimen 61 is provided, a power spectrum similar to that shown in FIG. 9 can be attained through Fourier transformation. Then, only frequency components in the dimensional intervals D 65, E 66 and F67 are taken, which correspond to stripe-pattern frequency signals in FIG. 9. To be more specific, a plurality of spots 82 appearing in a Fourier-transform image 81 shown in FIG. 18 are taken. These spots 82 are subjected to inverse Fourier transformation to reproduce a bandpass-filtered SEM image. FIG. 19 shows a luminance profile of the SEM image. In the dimensional intervals D 65, E 66 and F 67, an amplitude of luminance decreases in the order of amplitude D, amplitude E and amplitude F. As an interval of stripes is narrowed, a degree of detectable separation in imaging becomes lower. Under condition that completely detectable separation in imaging is attainable in the dimensional interval D, a ratio of amplitudes D, E and F in FIG. 19 can be plotted as a resolution curve or line as shown in FIG. 20, in which an interval (nm) is indicated on abscissa and an amplitude ratio (%) is indicated on ordinate. By applying Rayleigh limit of optical resolution, a value on the abscissa corresponding to a point below a level of 26% on the plotted curve or line can be defined as a limit of resolution/resolving power. The level of 26% may be changed for each instrument model according to experimental data attained from correlation examination, etc. As material films to be laminated, such combinations of W film and Si film, Ru film and C film, Mo film and B4C film, Ta film and Si film, etc. may be used in addition to a combination of W film and C film. While the single-crystal silicon substrate is used as a substrate on which these thin films are formed in the present preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that an applicable substrate material is not limited to single-crystal silicon. The specimen 51 prepared for SEM resolving power evaluation is not only applicable to performance evaluation in SEM production but also applicable to aging evaluation in SEM routine checkup or maintenance. Further, the numeric processor 19 may be arranged to incorporate image processing technology for performing automatic dimension measurement on a degree of image expansion through use of the abovementioned phenomena in SEM imaging. This makes it possible to carry out automatic measurement and quantitative evaluation of resolving power performance of each SEM. With the specimen 51 being mounted, each SEM can control its own resolving power performance at all times. Although there has been described one-dimensional direction (X-axis direction) in the present preferred embodiments, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that the invention is applicable to two-dimensional directions. It will also be obvious that resolving power varies with a change in accelerating voltage. Furthermore, if resolving power performance is not satisfactory, focusing condition can be adjusted by changing input condition set values for controlling the electron optical system including the electromagnetic lens 14 through use of input means 31. By changing input condition set values for regulating a vacuum control system 32 through use of the input means 31, it is also possible to adjust a degree of vacuum. In a situation where the electron gun 13 is not conditioned properly, it is necessary to adjust the electron gun 13. Moreover, since a storage device connected with the numeric processor 19 retains record data of resolving power performance, it is possible to let each user know a particular record of resolving power performance through the display means at any time. As set forth hereinabove, the present invention makes it possible to carry out quantitative evaluation of SEM resolving power/resolution using a multi-thin-film-layered specimen having known dimensions by means of frequency analysis of result data of SEM imaging, etc., thereby enabling acquisition of accurate data concerning SEM performance and deterioration with age. Particularly in semiconductor device inspection or semiconductor device fabrication where a plurality of SEM instruments are used, the present invention can contribute to reduction in instrumental error among SEM instruments to improve accuracy in measurement. Still more, unlike a conventional method of SEM performance evaluation using a gold-particle-evaporated carbon specimen, in which results of evaluation are affected by variations in size and shape of gold particles, the present invention enables consistent quantitative evaluation of SEM performance at any time using a specimen prepared as mentioned above. Besides, through measurement on a degree of SEM image expansion, it is possible to implement automatic measurement of resolving power. The invention may be embodied in other specific forms. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being defined by the appended claims rather by the foregoing description and all changes which come within the meaning of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.

Claims: An electron microscope resolving power evaluation method, characterized in comprising the steps of: preparing a specimen by overlaying materials having different emission coefficients of such secondary charged particles as secondary electrons, backscattered electrons, transmitted electrons, etc.; irradiating a cross-section including an overlaid material part of said specimen with an electron beam to attain a secondary charged particle image of the cross-section of said specimen by detecting secondary charged particles emitted therefrom; and performing quantitative evaluation of electron microscope resolving power using said secondary charged particle image thus attained, wherein quantitative evaluation of electron microscope resolving power is carried out by using a differential signal acquired through differentiation of from the signal of said secondary charged particle image. The method of claim 1, characterized in comprising the step of: preparing the specimen by overlaying thin films. The method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that each thin film on said substrate has a known thickness. The method of claim 1, characterized in comprising the step of: preparing multiple thin-film layers of two or more materials having different emission coefficients on said specimen.

Inventors: HORIUCHI TATSUO, KAWAME KEISUKE, KITAGAWA TAIJI, NINOMIYA TAKANORI, SATO MITSUGU, SHIMOMA GOROKU, TAKAHASHI TADANORI, YOSHIDA NAOTO, YUKII MASAYUKI, HORIUCHI, TATSUO, KAWAME, KEISUKE, KITAGAWA, TAIJI, NINOMIYA, TAKANORI, SATO, MITSUGU, SHIMOMA, GOROKU, TAKAHASHI, TADANORI, YOSHIDA, NAOTO, YUKII, MASAYUKI
Applicants: HITACHI LTD, HITACHI LTD.
Application year: 1998
Main classification: H01J37
IPC codes: G01N1, H01J37