Mercury adsorbent

Abstract: Activated carbon based adsorbent carrying acid for eliminating mercury or mercury compounds contained in hydrocarbons wherein the activated carbon base is preferably provided with a micropore volume having radii less than 8 angstroms at more than 80 ml/g and wherein the acid carried on the activated carbon is preferably hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, or phosphoric acid, with hydrochloric acid being the most prefered. The active carbon base is preferably manufactured by activating a carbonaceous material in an atmosphere comprising water vapor of less than 30 vol. %. The subject adsorbent is applicable to eliminate mercury or mercury compounds contained in hydrocarbons by contacting them in liquid phase. The hydrocarbons are naphtha and intermediates of oil products or petrochemical products. This method features scarce desorption of carried acid and is useful to treat such hydrocarbons to prevent possible harmful amalgamation due to mercury in oil industry.

Description: This invention relates to an activated carbon based adsorbent for mercury or mercury compounds contained in liquid hydrocarbons and method for the same, more particularly to activated carbon based adsorbents and method for adsorbing and eliminating mercury or mercury compounds (hereinafter often simply referred to as "mercury") contained in a slight amount in liquid hydrocarbons, for instance naphtha and intermediates of oil products or petrochemical products, by contacting such with capability of substantially complete elimination thereof from the liquid hydrocarbons of interest. Heretofore, alumina based catalyst carrying palladium, for instance, has been used for the hydrogenation process of reforming liquid hydrocarbons, such as naphtha, wherein the hydrogenation reaction suffers from damage of the catalyst if impurities of mercury or mercury compounds are present in the liquid hydrocarbons. Then, mercury tends to readily form amalgams with many kinds of metals. For such reason, if an apparatus constructed from aluminum based alloys is involved in such process, there is harmful risk of corrosion due to amalgamation with mercury. Accordingly there has been strong desire for progress in the elimination of mercury from such liquid hydrocarbons. There has been reported an adsorbent for mercury which is based on a porous adsorbent carrying sulfur to eliminate mercury by chemical reaction between mercury and sulfur. Further physical adsorption involving no chemical reaction with use of a porous adsorbent such as activated carbon, zeolite, alumina is feasible to eliminate inorganic mercury in hydrocarbons, but this method has such problems as inferior performance in mercury elimination rate wherein the adsorption performance exceedingly lowers in the case of a mercury concentration less than 10 ppb. In the art disclosed heretofore concerning the adsorbent carrying sulfur, the sulfur carrying activated carbon is, for example, prepared by mixing activated carbon with fine sulfur particles and heating such mixture at 110-400°C (Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 59-78915/1984); activated carbon carrying organic sulfur compound (Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 62-114632/1987). Therein, as for choice of a sulfur compound, the use of sulfur as such or organic sulfur compound such as thiophene is typical, and such porous adsorbents carrying sulfur compound have been intended to mainly eliminate mercury from a gaseous object of interest, instead of elimination from liquid hydrocarbons. Further, such art does not inhibit dissolution or desorption of the sulfur carried by the adsorbents into the liquid hydrocarbon as contamination, in addition to elimination of mercury as subject purpose. Liquid hydrocarbons are mostly subjected to the hydrogenation at the stage of intermediate product, wherein the contaminant or impurity sulfur contained in such hydrocarbon would give serious damage to the catalysts for hydrogenation. Thus the known art is undesirable compared to the pressent invention. An object of the invention is to provide an adsorbent and method for effectively adsorbing and eliminating mercury contained in a slight amount in liquid hydrocarbons including the oil product or the intermediate thereof, for instance naphtha, without dissolution of such a contaminant as sulfur into the hydrocarbons. Studies of the art heretofore regarding elimination of mercury contained in a slight amount in liquid hydrocarbons including the oil product or intermediate, for instance naphtha, prove that the activated carbon carrying sulfur or organic sulfur compounds does not inhibit dissolution of carried sulfur compounds into liquid hydrocarbons as far as the process is performed in liquid phase. The dissolution ranges from 10 to 400 ppm. The naphtha containing such sulfur concentration would give serious damage to the catalysts used in subsequent process. Thus the art known is conclusively limited to the gaseous process only, but unacceptable for the liquid process. Studies based on the activated carbon not carrying either sulfur or sulfur compounds were made. Then, as is known, the activated carbon is a kind of unique material having remarkably developed micropore structure and is active as non-polar adsorbent to nearly all substances. The activated carbon exhibits a certain degree of adsorption to inorganic mercury dispersed in a solution, and the adsorption of such mercury is fairly successful in the case of activated carbon having a limited micropore structure, but the activated carbon having such structure with no carrier effect is proved to be unsuccessful to adsorb and eliminate inorganic or organic mercury contained in a slight amount in liquid hydrocarbons to such extent that no harm would substantially ensue in subsequent oil process. In the present invention it has been found that activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid is remarkably superior to the activated carbon with no carried substance, wherein superior adsorption is confirmed of inorganic and organic mercury in liquid phase, but also of such mercury present in a slight amount. Further it is confirmed that where hydrochloric acid is carried in excess in the preparation, such excess hydrochloric acid can be drained out in the preparation stage and undrained or carried hydrochloric acid will not dissolve or desorb into the liquid phase in the applied adsorption process. The studies also confirmed effectiveness of acids other than hydrochloric acid, and further added are studies on micropore volume as well as micropore distribution suitable to adsorbing and retaining the acids including hydrochloric acid, and these studies sustain the present invention. The present invention provides an adsorbent comprising an activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid for adsorbing mercury contained in liquid hydrocarbons, wherein the activated carbon has a micropore volume of more than 80 ml/g defined by the micropores whose radii are less than 0,8 nm. Herein, the micropore volume is defined as adsorption volume of nitrogen gas measured by the instrument BEL SORP which is converted to a volume of gas at standard conditions. Such value will be referred to as micropore volume. Where the micropore volume defined by adsorbed gas volume may be expressed by denotation in liquid nitrogen, this conversion will be obtained by assuming that 1 ml of nitrogen gas at standard condition, is equivalent to 0.001555 ml of liquid nitrogen. As an acid carried by the activated carbon, hydrochloric acid is used. As for the activated carbon, preferred preparation is such that carbonaceous material is activated in an atmosphere including a water vapor content of less than 30 volume % (hereafter a gas composition is expressed by volumetric percentages and often denoted simply as %) and cooled down below 300 °C in the same atmosphere, or the activated carbon obtained by usual process is subjected to treatment under nitrogen gas or carbon dioxide gas with substantially no oxygen and/or water vapor at a temperature higher than 500°C and cooled down below 300 °C in the same atmosphere. The present invention includes a preferable method of adsorbing and eliminating mercury contained in a slight amount in hydrocarbons including oil product or intermediate thereof, such as naphtha, by using the above-mentioned activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid in liquid phase. The mercury adsorbent of the invention comprises the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid, and the base material of activated carbon is provided with a specific surface of not less than several hundreds of square meters per gram. Source materials include carbonized product of coconut shell, phenol resin, and the like or coal. As for the form, any form such as crushed, particle or granule form is effective, but in view of pressure drop, adsorption capacity, and handling convenience in exchange of charged loads in field work, particle or granule form is preferable. The granules are manufactured as usual by blending 100 parts of the carbonaceous material with 30-60 parts of oil pitch, coal tar or resin, and by kneading and molding followed by activation. The activated carbon thus obtained is a unique material as non-polar adsorbent exhibiting superior adsorption to nearly all liquid or gaseous objects. The present invention employs the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid which adsorbs mercury largely and will not let the acid dissolve or desorb into naphtha during application or will not cause any chemical changes. Regarding these considerations hydrochloric acid is used. Improvement in the mercury adsorption attained by the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid as compared with the activated carbon with no carried substance is shown in Table 1, appearing in the following. Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, appearing in the following, show mercury concentrations contained in light naphtha and mercury adsorptions nearly at equilibrium adsorption. The data shows that, in the case of mercury concentrations of 100, 10, 1 µg/kg, adsorbed mercury is 0.95, 0.64, 0.38 mg/g by the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid and 0.14. 0.03, 0.01 mg/g by the activated carbon carrying no hydrochloric acid. This shows that the mercury adsorption by activated carbon carrying hydrochlorid acid is improved 7, 21, and 38 times, respectively. Thus, the superiority in mercury adsorption by the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid is made clear when compared with the same activated carbon carrying nothing. Remarkable therein is that the improvement in the adsorption is superior in the case of a lower mercury concentration in naphtha, and this result shows that the inventive adsorbent is suitable to the object of the present invention in view of the fact that mercury concentrations contained in liquid hydrocarbons are exceedingly low. With respect to prevention of the carried acid from desorption, the prevention by washing out or removal of excess acid after adsorbing hydrochloric acid is feasible, such acid molecules adsorbed inside the micropores of the activated carbon structure are so strongly combined that such acid molecules are not readily to desorb or become free. This feature is so remarkable with molecules of hydrochloric acid having such a small molecular size that this acid is highly resistant to desorption or liberation into liquid hydrocarbons. On the other hand, it is necessary to wash out excess acid after adsorption thereof to avoid the acid desorption which will cause possible troubles in the subsequent process. Hydrochloric acid is the most preferable in consideration of a minimal tendency of desorption and superior performance in the mercury adsorption. Turning to the requirement for the activated carbon, some difference in the performance is found wherein the mechanism taken by the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid in adsorbing mercury is unknown and wherein the studies on relationship between the specific surface area, micropore volume, distribution of the micropores of the activated carbon and the mercury adsorption prove that the mercury adsorption is sharply correlated to a proportion of the micropore volume having smaller micropore radii. In Examples 1, 2, and 3, employed are the activated carbons having nearly the same micropore volume but different proportions of the micropore volume having radii less than 0,8 nm which ranges from Example 1 (largest proportion) to 2 and 3. The results indicate that the proportion of the micropores having radii less than 0,8 nm is significant. That is, it is presumed that mercury is mainly adsorbed into micropores having less than 0,8 nm. In view of other results, the activated carbon provided with the micropore volume of more than 80 ml/g having the micropore radii less than 0,8 nm is necessary. Turning to the descriptions about more detailed operations related to the present invention. As for the activated carbon base carrying hydrochloric acid, usual manufacture process therefor is already noted. Therein, a general tendency is such that when the degree of activation is made higher, the volume of microporeshaving smaller radii lowers. The activation conditions are influential to increase in the total micropore volume and to accompanying decrease in the smaller micropore proportion. As noted before, the activated carbon provided with the micropore volume of more than 80 ml/g having the micropore radii less than 0,8 nm is necessary. In the present invention, measurements on the micropore distribution and micropore volume of activated carbon bases are done by the instrument commercially named: BEL SORP, Type 28 SA manufactured by JAPAN BEL INC. and calculated based on the adsorption isotherm line for nitrogen gas. Thereby the measurable lower limit for the micropore radii is at 0,3-0,4 nm and upper limit is at 60-70 angstroms. Normally the activated carbon has the total micropore volume of 100-500 ml/g and the average radius at 12-14 angstroms, and accordingly the invention prefers the activated carbon having a high proportion of the micropore volume provided with smallest radius range. Therefore, advisable activation conditions are those for depressing the tendency of enlarging the average micropore radii with enhancing the total micropore volume. The activation gas for manufacturing the activated carbon normally contains water vapor and carbon dioxide gas and the present invention does not limit the content of carbon dioxide, but the water vapor content is necessarily less than 30%. Normally the water vapor not less than 40-60% is employed, since the activation rate brought by water vapor is largely higher than that by carbon dioxide and thus a gas composition is set to have more water vapor content. Compared with the normal condition, the present invention prefers a mild condition with slower activation rate. Table 1 and Examples 1-5 in the following show that the activated carbon activated under the condition including a higher water vapor content contains less micropore volume having micropore radii less than 0,8 nm and in turn performs inferior mercury adsorption. Detailed mechanism is unknown of why the activation condition containing less water vapor content improves the mercury adsorption, but it is presumed that such activation condition should provide for such internal structure that the micropore having smaller radii accounts for large proportion, and such micropore portion contributes to the mercury adsorption. In order to increase the micropore volume having micropore radii less than 0,8 nm preferred is to set the condition including the water vapor content at less than 15% in the activation gas and to depress lowering the micropore volume having radii less than 0,8 nm and further preferred is the condition to increase the activation degree. In the present invention it is necessary to cool the activated carbon under the gas composition unchanged or similar to that for the activation until below 300 °C and then taking out from the system after the activation. Herein, the cooling gas composition unchanged or similar to that necessary for the activation means nitrogen gas, carbon dioxide gas or mixture thereof or one which substantially contains no oxygen and/or water vapor, and accordingly this requirement does not mean that the activation gas and the cooling gas should have the same composition, and "substantially contains no oxygen and/or water vapor" means such gaseous condition which does not permit the existence of oxygen atoms combined on the micropore surface of the activated carbon, in other words, a condition containing oxygen and water vapor at less than 1-2%. Further, the activated carbon preferred in the invention is obtained by conversion from the one obtained by the normal or usual activation condition. That is, such normal activated carbon is heated in a gas composition used for the above-mentioned preferable activation condition, to a temperature higher than 500°C and cooled below 300 °C in the same gas. Herein, the upper limit of the heat treatment temperature is not limitative, however, it is preferably less than activation temperature, usually more than 850 °C. Then, "activated carbon obtained by normal or usual condition" means the one which was activated in such an atmosphere containing water vapor at fairly higher than 15% and thereafter cooled and taken out into air before enough cooling down. In the previous description about the conversion, the treatment time of the normal activated carbon depends upon the temperature wherein 500 °C prefer 20-180 min, and 800 °C prefer several min. This conversion is thought to bring about such effect due to sintering or shrinkage of micropores which comes from the heat effect to carbonaceous structure wherein the employment of the heat treatment under such circumstance as noted bases on the thought that such would prevent loss by oxidation on the carbonaceous surface and enhance the shrinkage in micropore radii. As for the form of the activated carbon, any form in powder, crushed, pellet, particle, granule, fibrous, or honeycomb form is acceptable. The granular or molded form is manufactured as usual by blending 100 parts of the carbonaceous material with 30-60 parts of oil pitch or coal tar as binder, and by kneading and molding followed by activation. The step of carrying or adsorbing an acid to the activated carbon thus obtained is feasible by immersing the activated carbon mass into a hydrochloric acid solution and letting the acid adsorb into micropores and thereafter by washing out excess acid component by water or organic solvent for removal. The concentration of the hydrochloric acid solution is not limitative, but 0.1 N to 3 N (normality) is suitable. As for adsorption method, in addition to immersing into a solution as noted, impregnation by spraying of such a hydrochloric acid solution like shower may be employed. It is a requisite to remove unadsorbed or excess hydrochloric acid, from the activated carbon base after the carrying process. The presence of unadsorbed acid would invite dissolution thereof into liquid hydrocarbons and give damage to the catalysts used in the subsequent oil process or cause harmful corrosion due to amalgamation. The washing out is feasible by mild stirring a water or organic solvent based solution, wherein the activated carbon is immersed. Thereafter, the activated carbon carrying acid may be packed into an adsorption tower after sufficient drying or at the state of containing water at about 50 %. Otherwise, after packing such activated carbon into the adsorption tower, back washing by an organic solvent is permitted to remove the excess acid. As noted hereinbefore, the importance in the invention lies in the micropores having radii less than 0,8 nm. Acid molecules adsorbed in such micropores will not desorb or dissolve out by washing in water or organic solvent. Further, such acid molecules at the state adsorbed in the micropores will perform the superior adsorption for mercury and scarcely desorb through contact with liquid hydrocarbon. In the process of adsorbing hydrochloric acid, for instance, immersing the activated carbon mass into 1-2 N. hydrochloric acid solution for about 1 hour is enough to perform the adsorption noted and in turn the hydrochloric acid molecules are so strongly combined by the adsorption that such molecules after the washing noted would not desorb through contact with liquid hydrocarbons. Test result concerning the desorption during immersing into distilled water for long time is shown at the level of trace or less than 1 mg/g as Examples 1-5 show. It is thought that hydrochloric acid for the reason of its small molecular size is suited to be caught in exceedingly small pores. In view of these results, hydrochloric acid is the best among the inorganic acids. When the activated carbon carrying acid is immersed in distilled water, though acid molecules are combined strongly, pH value reading lowers a little, and this pH lowering indicates that the carried substance is an acid. This lowering becomes clearer if temperature is raised more than 60 °C. This phenomenon is thought to be a result of the nature of a strong acid if there is only a trace amount thereof. Normally the activated carbon is manufactured from carbonaceous material including coconut shell, coal or charcoal, and plant tissues generally contain a trace amount of potassium, sodium and other metallic compounds, and these are changed to oxides, for instance potassium oxide, through carbonization and activation processes, and such will produce metal hydroxide in contact with water and as a result, pH value would be led to about 9-10. Further, in the case of phenol resin as starting material, such activated carbon shows a weak acidity in pH value when immersed in distilled water, but such acidity extent is nearly equal to such resultant reading that distilled water is left in air for long time and its pH tends to acidic region, due to dissolution of carbon dioxide contained in air, and the case from the phenol resin will not drop further in pH value. However, the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid tends to drop below pH 6.5 when immersed in distilled water for long time. Accordingly, the identification of carried acid can be readily done by measuring the pH value immersed in distilled water. The present invention includes the method of eliminating mercury contained in hydrocarbons. Herein, the hydrocarbon means a broad range of hydrocarbons which will be subjected to elimination of mercury by solid-liquid contact process with mercury adsorbent in solid form, such objective is mainly naphtha and intermediates of oil products or petrochemical products. Typical is naphtha or other intermediate which is composed of hydrocarbons having about 6-15 carbon atoms and present in liquid phase at ambient temperature, and in addition, liquefied hydrocarbons derived from oil (petroleum) or coal may be applied to the method of the present invention. Further, hydrocarbons having not more than 5 carbon atoms including natural gas, ethylene, propylene are in gas form at ambient temperature, but these resources may be handled in liquefied form under pressure. Such liquified hydrocarbons may also be applied to the present method, and such hydrocarbons present in gas form at ambient temperature may be converted to liquid state and then such may be applied to the present method. In particular, liquified hydrocarbons having not more than 5 carbon atoms including liquified natural gas (LNG), liquified petroleum gas (LPG), liquified ethylene, liquified propylene, and naphtha, are commercially handled in liquid phase and such liquid hydrocarbons may be applied to the adsorbent of the present invention. Thus remarkable industrial merit will be awarded. The objective liquid hydrocarbon may be a single, component or a blend of a plurality of such components. The method for eliminating mercury may be applied to any form of mercury contained in liquid hydrocarbons, and such includes mercury as such, inorganic mercury compounds, organic mercury compounds, and there is no limitation concerning concentration, that is, the present invention may be applied to hydrocarbons containing an amount of, a trace of, or an exceedingly small amount of mercury. The main objective is naphtha which usually contains mercury at 0.002-10 mg/kg and such a slight level is suited to the present invention which employs the method of adsorption. In field practice of eliminating mercury, preferred is such a pretreatment as filtering the objective liquid hydrocarbon to remove the sludge contained therein together with mercury removable by the filtration as sludge component. The present method for eliminating mercury is advantageously feasible by the process of employing an adsorption tower packed with the activated carbon in the form of fixed bed, wherein the preferred particle size ranges from 4.75 to 0.15 mm, more preferably 1.70 to 0.50 mm. When the mercury concentration in hydrocarbon is at 100 µg/kg, the necessary mass of the activated carbon depends upon the allowable concentration at the outlet part and the kind of adsorbent. However, roughly stated, 0.1-10 g of mercury may be eliminated with use of 1 kg of the adsorbent. As described above, the inventive activated carbon based adsorbent is capable of nearly complete elimination of mercury contained in a slight amount in hydrocarbons by solid-liquid contact with the liquid hydrocarbons, and the hydrochloric acid carried on the activated carbon would scarcely desorb into the objective hydrocarbons. Thus the invention is suitable to treatment of naphtha and intermediates of oil products or petrochemical products. The invention will be further described by examples in the following. Example 1 Coconut shells were carbonized to carbonaceous substance and then crushed to 4-10 mesh (particle size ranges from 1.7 mm to 4.75 mm) which was used as raw material to prepare the activated carbon base in particle form. This carbonized material was activated at 900 °C by combustion gas of liquefied petroleum gas (gas composition: nitrogen 70% oxygen 0.2%, carbon dioxide 19.8% water vapor 10%) and cooled in the same gas below 300 °C. The activated carbon was crushed to the particle size from 10 to 32 mesh (particle size ranges from 0.5 mm to 1.7 mm). The activated carbon thus obtained had an ash component (residue after strong incineration) of 2.5 wt.%. The activated carbon particles obtained above were vacuum deaerated and measured of the adsorption isotherm line in nitrogen gas by the instrument (BEL SORP Type 28 SA, JAPAN BEL INC.) and thereon the total micropore volume and radius distribution of the micropores were calculated. The total micropore volume was 279 ml/g and proportion of micropore volume having radii less than 0,8 nm was 43 %. That is, the micropore volume is 120 ml/g. As noted before, herein the micropore volume is always denoted by conversion from the nitrogen gas adsorbed amount to the volume at the standard condition. If converted to the volume of liquid nitrogen, the total micropore volume is 0.434 ml/g and the micropore volume having radii less than 0,8 nm is 0.187 ml/g. Then, the activated carbon particles were immersed in 1N hydrochloric acid aqueous solution for 1.5 h at room temperature and then washed with distilled water and dried at 110 °C for 12 h. , and then washed with light naphtha (C 6 to C 9 hydrocarbons). Mercury adsorption was measured at various mercury concentrations by contacting the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid with light naphtha containing mercury and mercury compounds, wherein organic mercury accounts for 20 % of the total mercury contained in the light naphtha. The adsorbent, thus prepared activated carbon (10 g)was immersed in the light naphtha with mild stirring and after 2 h residual mercury concentration in the naphtha and mercury adsorption by the activated carbon were measured. The mercury adsorption performance was evaluated by measuring mercury adsorbed by the activated carbon at naphtha mercury concentrations: 100, 10, 1 µ g/kg. Quantitative determination of mercury was made by atomic adsorption analysis. Table 1 shows description of the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid and result of mercury adsorption. Under the condition which was thought to be at nearly equilibrium, the adsorbed mercury is: 0.95, 0.38 mg/g for mercury concentration: 100, 1 µ g/kg. This result shows that the subject activated carbon has superior mercury adsorption. Further, no organic mercury was found in the subject naphtha after the adsorption, that is, all organic mercury was adsorbed by the subject activated carbon. Note: In the Table, organic mercury adsorption is ranked: ○ is good, × is fail, and overall mercury adsorption is ranked: o ○ is superior, ○ is good, Δ is employable, × is fail. Examples 2 to 5 The activation process herein employed activation gases having different water vapor contents: 30 % (Example 2). 45 % (Example 3), 55 % (Example 4), 65 % (Example 5). Otherwise all conditions were kept to be the same as those employed in Example 1, and thereby the activated carbon was prepared and subjected to the step of carrying hydrochloric acid and washed with distilled water and light naphtha. Thus the adsorbents, wherein activated carbon carries hydrochloric acid, were obtained, and these were applied to the same mercury adsorption test as noted in Example 1. Table 1 shows description of the activated carbons carrying hydrochloric acid and result of mercury adsorption. The result indicates that the water vapor content in the activation gas increases with decrease in the micropore volume of the micropores having radii less than 0,8 nm and its proportion in the total micropore volume. As for the mercury adsorption, each adsorbent performs mercury adsorption, wherein the adsorbed amount decreases with decrease in the volume of micropores having radii less than 0,8 nm. Comparative Example 1 The adsorbent composed of the activated carbon prepared in Example 1 and with no carried substance was employed to test mercury adsorption. The result is shown in Table 1, wherein the pH value of the subject activated carbon immersed in distilled water was 8.8. Further, adsorbed mercury amount is exceedingly low as compared with Example 1. The adsorbents employed in Examples 2-5 have smaller volume of the micropores having radii less than 0,8 nm as compared with the adsorbent employed in Comparative Example 1, but the mercury adsorption performed by Comparative Example 1 is lower than that by Examples 2-5. This shows that carrying hydrochloric acid has large effect in the mercury adsorption. Examples 6 and 7 Herein the same carbonaceous material as in Example 1 was employed to prepare the activated carbon base, wherein in the activation process different conditions were employed. That is, Example 7 was subjected to milder or lower activation to prepare the activated carbon base provided with the micropore volume having radii less than 0,8 nm at 82 ml/g. And Example 6 was subjected to stronger or higher activation to prepare the activated carbon base provided with the micropore volume having radii less than 0,8 nm at 108 ml/g. The steps taken subsequently were carrying hydrochloric acid and washing, drying to finish the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid, and the mercury adsorption test was carried out in the same way as in Example 1. Description of the activated carbons carrying hydrochloric acid and result of the mercury adsorption are shown in Table 2. Then, Example 7 employed lower activation than Example 1, wherein the activated carbon of Example 7 had: a total micropore volume of 117 ml/g, proportion of the micropore volume having radii less than 0,8 nm was increased to 70 % whose micropore volume is 82 ml/g. Then Example 6 employed higher activation than Example 1, wherein the activated carbon of Example 6 had: a total micropore volume of 327 ml/g proportion of the micropore volume having radii less than 0,8 nm was decreased to 33 % whose micropore volume is 108 ml/g. It is to be noticed that this value is lower than that in Example 1. Further, the mercury adsorption amount in Example 7 is ranked good, and the same in Example 6 is superior, wherein in either example no organic mercury was found in naphtha after the adsorption. Examples 8-10 As carbonaceous material leading to the activated carbon, carbonized particles of phenol resin (Examples 8 and 9) and carbonized fiber of phenol resin (Example 10) were employed to prepare the activated carbon base and the steps of carrying hydrochloric acid, washing, drying were carried out to finish the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid and then the mercury adsorption test was conducted in the same way as in Example 1. Table 2 shows description of the activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid and result of the mercury adsorption test. The adsorbent prepared in Example 10 from fibrous phenol resin had very large micropore volume having radii less than 8 angstroms at 148 ml/g, and the mercury adsorption amounts were 1.53, 0.82 mg/g for mercury concentrations in light naphtha at 100, 1 µ g/kg. Thus, a superior result was obtained. Comparative Example 2 Adsorbent carrying sulfur was compared. Particulate activated carbon obtained in Example 1 at 100 g was mixed with powder of sulfur(1 g)and heated to prepare the adsorbent carrying sulfur at 1% in amount, which was subjected to the mercury adsorption test in the same way as in Example 1. Table 3 shows description of the adsorbent carrying sulfur and result of mercury adsorption test. This adsorbent carrying sulfur exhibits considerably good mercury adsorption, but exhibits a large dissolution of sulfur into naphtha as shown in Table 3. Accordingly, in view of such possible trouble or damage to catalysts used in oil process, this adsorbent is out of the consideration as mercury eliminator for naphtha. Example 14 This illustrates a prototype field operation. A quantity of particles of activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid in the form of 10-32 mesh as prepared in Example 1 was packed in an adsorption tower (diameter: 25.4 cm, height 1 m) and light naphtha containing mercury at 7 µg/kg was flown or passed at a flow rate [LV value (linear velocity): 0.25 m/min]. The result of analysis showed that the light naphtha output from the tower was nearly completely freed from mercury including organic mercury. Further chlorine ions dissolved into the naphtha were less than 0.1 mg/kg or at a trace level. That is, dissolution of chlorine ions was hardly found.

Claims: An adsorbent used for adsorbing mercury or mercury compounds contained in liquid hydrocarbons in liquid phase, the adsorbent comprising an activated carbon carrying only hydrochloric acid, said activated carbon has more than 80 ml/g of micropore volume having radii less than 0,8 nm. The adsorbent used for adsorbing mercury or mercury compounds contained in liquid hydrocarbons in liquid phase as defined in claim 1, the adsorbent comprising an activated carbon carrying only hydrochloric acid, said activated carbon is manufactured by activating a carbonaceous material in an atmosphere containing less than 30 vol.% water vapor and then cooling in the same atmosphere to less than 300 °C, or said activated carbon is manufactured by heat treating an activated carbon prepared by usual process, at a temperature over 500 °C in a gas composition comprised of nitrogen gas and/or carbon dioxide gas containing oxygen and water vapor less than 1 - 2%, and then cooling in the same atmosphere to less than 300 °C. A process for removing mercury or mercury compounds from liquid hydrocarbons, comprising contacting the adsorbent as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 with mercury or mercury compounds contained in the liquid phase. The process for removing mercury or mercury compounds from liquid hydrocarbons as defined in claim 3, wherein the liquid hydrocarbons are naphtha or intermediates of petrochemical products. Use of an adsorbent comprising an activated carbon carrying hydrochloric acid, said activated carbon has more than 80 ml/g of micropore volume having radii less than 0.8 nm for adsorbing mercury or mercury compounds in liquid hydrocarbons in liquid phase, wherein the liquid hydrocarbons are preferably naphtha or intermediates of petrochemical products.

Inventors: OHTSUKA KIYOTO, OHTSUKA, KIYOTO
Applicants: KURARAY CHEMICAL KK, KURARAY CHEMICAL CO., LTD.
Application year: 1997
Main classification: C10G25
IPC codes: C01B31, C10G25, B01J20, B01D15