PLATELET COUNT ASSAY USING PLATELET GRANULE PROTEINS

Abstract: Methods of calculating the platelet count of an individual, by measuring the amount of a released platelet granule protein in a sample of whole blood or of platelet-rich plasma from the individual, are described. The amount of released platelet granule protein of interest in the whole blood sample or platelet-rich plasma sample is measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; radioimmunoassay; sandwich assay; a quantitative immunochromatographic assay; or non-solid phase nephelometry. The platelet count is directly related to the amount of released platelet granule protein of interest in the sample, and can be determined from the amount of platelet granule protein of interest that is released from a known number of platelets.

Description: PLATELET COUNT ASSAY USING PLATELET GRANULE PROTEINS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In a wide variety of clinical and therapeutic situations, blood platelet counts are routinely needed. Abnormalities in platelet counts can cause significant bleeding problems in a patient, and may indicate a multitude of underlying conditions. Measurement of blood platelet counts typically requires complex instrumentation and a clinical laboratory. Automated hematology analyzers can be used to obtain platelet counts over a wide range of values; however, manual hemacytometer counts are necessary for measurement of low platelet counts. Other blood constituents, such as red and white blood cells, as well as instrument artifacts may interfere with accurate assessment of platelet count. Methods for determination of platelet count by a simple, portable procedure are necessary. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to methods of determining the platelet count of an individual, by obtaining a blood sample from the individual, and measuring the amount of a platelet granule protein that is released from platelets in the blood sample, or the amount of a platelet granule protein that is released from platelets in a platelet-rich plasma sample derived from the blood sample. Examples of platelet granule proteins are thrombospondin, platelet factor 4, and β-thromboglobulin. The amount of a platelet granule protein of interest is measured using an appropriate quantitative means, such as an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; a quantitative immunochromatographic assay; or other appropriate means. The platelet count of the individual is determined from the amount of the platelet granule protein of interest; the determination is based on a relationship between the amount of released platelet granule protein of interest and platelet count. The relationship is a quantitative positive correlation between the platelet count in a sample of blood (or platelet-rich plasma) and the amount of the platelet granule protein of interest that is released from platelets upon clotting. The methods of the invention provide swift, accurate determination of platelet count, including low platelet counts, without complex instrumentation. Furthermore, the methods provide an on-site method for platelet count determination at the point of care of the patient, and do not require skilled technical labor to perform. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES Figure 1 is a graphic representation of a thrombospondin standard curve using a sandwich ELISA assay. Figure 2 is a graphic representation of the effect of blocking with thrombospondm-depleted plasma on the thrombospondin ELISA. Open squares, without plasma; filled squares, with plasma. Figure 3 is a graphic representation of the standard curve for platelet count, using a competitive inhibition ELISA. Figure 4 is a graphic representation of OD and thrombospondin concentration interpreted from a standard curve plotted as a function of the platelet count. Closed squares, ug of thrombospondin; open squares, OD at 405 nm. Figure 5 is a graphic representation of the correlation between platelet counts obtained from Coulter counter and inhibition ELISA for six individuals in an initial study. Filled bars, Coulter counter; open bars, thrombospondin ELISA. Figure 6 is a graphic representation of a calibration curve demonstrating sensitivity of the inhibition ELISA over the normal range, on 32 samples from normal donors (closed squares) and 10 samples from donors with thrombocytopenia (open squares) . Figure 7 is a graphic representation of the relationship between absolute platelet count as determined by the automated cell counter and the amount of the platelet granule protein, platelet factor 4, found in serum samples. Figure 8 is a graphic representation of the relationship between absolute platelet count as determined by the automated cell counter and the amount of the platelet granule protein, β-thromboglobulin, found in serum samples. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The current invention pertains to methods of determining platelet count. As described herein. Applicants have discovered a relationship between the amount of a platelet granule protein released from platelets in a sample and the platelet count. The platelet count in a sample of blood (or platelet-rich plasma) directly correlates with the amount of thrombospondin, platelet factor 4, and β-thromboglobulin released from platelets upon clotting. The correlation is constant from individual to individual, and is not dependent on disease state. As a result of this discovery, methods are now available to determine the platelet count of an individual by measuring the amount of a released platelet granule protein in a sample of whole blood or of platelet-rich plasma. The term, "platelet granule protein," as used herein, refers to a protein or peptide that is released from platelet granules during clotting. Examples of platelet granule proteins are thrombospondin, platelet factor 4, and β-thromboglobulin. In a preferred embodiment, the platelet granule protein is thrombospondin. A sample of blood is taken from the individual for whom the platelet count will be determined, using standard methods. Approximately 100-500 μl of blood are typically drawn; the amount of blood that is used will vary, depending on the method used to quantify the platelet granule protein. If platelet-rich plasma is used to determine the platelet count, a platelet-rich plasma sample is isolated from the blood sample, using standard methods. Platelet granule protein is released from platelets in the whole blood sample or in the platelet-rich plasma sample, using methods such as a releasing agent, or contact activation. Releasing agents such as thrombin, calcium ionophore A23187, phorbol esters and detergents, can all be used to release platelet granule proteins from platelets. More than one releasing agent can also be used. Alternatively, thrombin generation by the natural clotting process that is initiated by contact activation when blood is drawn into glass containers in the absence of anticoagulant is sufficient for the purposes of the invention. Thus, addition of an agent to release the platelet granule proteins is not necessary if blood is allowed to clot naturally by contact activation. The platelet granule protem released by the releasing agent or by contact activation is referred to herein as "released platelet granule protein." A sample of whole blood, or a platelet- rich plasma sample, that contains released platelet granule proteins, is referred to herein as a "test sample". After release of platelet granule protein from the platelets, the amount of released platelet granule protein of interest m the test sample is measured. The "platelet granule protein of interest", also referred to herein as the "released platelet granule protein of interest" is the platelet granule protein that is measured. More than one platelet granule protein can be measured. Any method which quantitatively measures the platelet granule protein of interest can be used. Appropriate methods include, but are not limited to, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) ; radioimmunoassay; sandwich assay; non-solid phase nephelometry; and quantitative immunochromatographic assay (Kemeny, D.M. and Challacombe, S.J. (eds), ELISA and Other Solid Phase Immunoassays: Theoretical and Practical Aspects, John Wiley and Sons , New York (1988)) . In a preferred embodiment of the invention, released platelet granule protein of interest is measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) . The ELISA can be performed as an inhibition ELISA (Kemeny, D.M. and Challacombe, S.J. (eds), ELISA and Other Solid Phase Immunoassays: Theoretical and Practical Aspects, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1988)), m which the platelet granule protein present in a test sample binds to anti- (platelet granule protein) antibody, making the antibody unavailable to bind to a platelet granule protein-coated microtitre well. A microtitre plate coated with the platelet granule protein is used. An appropriate anti- (platelet granule protein) antibody is incubated with a test sample for an appropriate length of time to allow binding of the anti- (platelet granule protein) antibody to the platelet granule protein, if present, in the test samples. The test sample-antibody mixture is exposed to the platelet granule protein-coated microtitre plate for an appropriate length of time to allow antibody in the test sample-antibody mixture to bind to the platelet granule protein that is immobilized on the plate. Unbound protein is washed from the microtitre plate wells with an appropriate buffer, such as Tris-buffered saline, and the bound anti- (platelet granule protein) antibody is detected by an appropriate means, such as by incubating with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti- (anti-platelet granule protein antibody) IgG. A chromogenic substrate, such as p- nitrophenyl phosphate, is used to detect the signal of the bound antibody. Alternatively, other appropriate labels for the IgG antibodies can be used, such as peroxidase- conjugated anti-IgG; radiolabels; colloidal gold label; or fluorescent label. A detection means that is appropriate for the label is used. For example, an optical signal can be determined using an ELISA plate reader. The amount of the platelet granule protein of interest in the sample is determined based on the standard curve. The standard curve for the platelet granule protein of interest is generated by preparing a series of control samples of known concentrations of the platelet granule protein of interest in serum or platelet-poor plasma containing no detectable platelet granule protein of interest. Anti- (platelet granule protein) antibody is incubated with the test samples; the ELISA is performed on the series of control samples at the same time as the test sa ple, on the same platelet granule protein-coated microtitre plate, and the values are plotted as a function of the concentration of platelet granule protein included in the control samples. After the amount of released platelet granule protein in the test sample is measured, the platelet count can be determined. The determination is based on the amount of platelet granule protein of interest that is released from a known number of platelets. To determine platelet count, a reference curve (also herein referred to as the "granule protein/platelet curve") can be established by plotting the amount of platelet granule protein in control samples against platelet counts determined by a standard hematology counter. Control samples (such as whole blood or platelet- rich plasma samples) include samples from normal donors and samples from donors with abnormally low platelet counts. At least approximately 20 normal donors and 10 donors with abnormally low platelet counts should be used for generation of the granule protein/platelet reference curve. The curve should contain samples from donors with platelet counts at or below 10 x 10 9 /L in order to determine the shape of the line for the full range of anticipated platelet counts. The amount of platelet granule protein of interest is plotted against the platelet count. The platelet count from a test sample is determined by referring to the granule protein/platelet curve. Alternatively, the reference curve can be generated using serum from blood containing a known number of platelets. ELISA values for the platelet granule protein of interest can then be plotted as a function of the platelet number, and the platelet count for a test sample can be determined directly from the ELISA results for the test sample. In another embodiment of the invention, released platelet granule protein is measured using a quantitative immunochromatographic assay. In one example of a quantitative immunochromatographic assay, the assay utilizes a rapid antigen measurement platform (RAMP™) apparatus. The apparatus includes a membrane strip made of a suitable material, such as cellulose nitrate or glass fiber, which has sufficient porosity and the ability to be wet by the fluid containing the analyte, and which allows movement of particles by capillary action. The membrane strip has an application point, a contact region, and a detection zone; the contact region is between the application point and the detection zone. Imbedded in the contact region is a population of particles, such as colloidal metal particles, organic molecules, liposomes, or organic polymer latex particles. The particles are coated with an antibody to the platelet granule protein. The particles can be labeled, using a colorimetric, fluorescent, luminescent, or other appropriate label, to facilitate detection. A detection reagent is immobilized in the detection zone. The detection reagent can be antibody to platelet granule protein, or can be the platelet granule protein itself. The apparatus can also include one or more of the following features: an application pad, which rests on and covers the application point; a contact pad, which rests on and covers the contact region, and which may have antibody-coated particles imbedded within it; if a contact pad is present, a separator pad, which rests on the membrane in between the contact region and the contact pad; a wicking pad, which 7/37229 PC17US97/05081 - 9- rests on the membrane adjacent to the detection zone, on the opposite side of the detection zone from the contact region; and an internal control, which includes internal control particles imbedded in the contact region, a control detection reagent, and a control reaction zone. In order to conduct the quantitative assay for platelet granule protein using whole blood or a platelet- rich plasma sample, the platelet granule protein must be released from the platelets, either before application of the sample to the apparatus, or by application of the sample to the apparatus. The platelet granule protein can be released from platelets in the whole blood sample or in the platelet-rich plasma sample by the methods described above. In a preferred embodiment, the RAMP™ apparatus includes an application pad, which is used to release the platelet granule protein from platelets. The whole blood sample or the platelet-rich plasma sample is applied to the application pad and release of the platelet granule protein results. The application pad can additionally be impregnated with one or more releasing agent (s), such as those described above, to facilitate release of the platelet granule protein. The platelet granule protein released by the releasing agent or by contact activation is referred to herein as "released platelet granule protein." To conduct the assay, the application point (or application pad) of the membrane strip is contacted with the fluid sample. The apparatus is then maintained under conditions which are sufficient to allow capillary action of fluid to transport released platelet granule protein, if present in the sample, through the membrane strip to the contact region. The apparatus is further maintained under appropriate conditions so that when the platelet granule protein reaches the contact region, it binds to the antibody-coated particles imbedded in the contact region. Antibody-coated particles which have been maintained under conditions allowing analyte in the fluid to bind to the antibody-coated particles imbedded in the contact region, and/or the contact pad, if present, are referred to herein as "contacted antibody-coated particles". Contacted antibody-coated particles may or may not have analyte bound to the antibodies. Contacted antibody-coated particles, including those which are bound with platelet granule protein, are mobilized by fluid and move by capillary action through the strip to the detection zone. The detection reagent interacts with platelet granule protein- bound antibody-coated particles, forming detection-reagent- particle complexes. The detection-reagent-particle- complexes are arrested (e.g., immobilized) in the detection zone. The amount of platelet granule protein-bound antibody-coated particles that are arrested in the detection zone is then detected. The amount of platelet granule protein in the fluid sample is related to the amount of platelet granule protein-bound antibody-coated particles that are arrested in the detection zone: if the detection reagent is platelet granule protein, the amount of platelet granule protein in the fluid sample is inversely related; if the detection reagent is antibody against the same epitope, or against a different epitope, of the platelet granule protein, as those antibodies coated onto the particles, the amount of platelet granule protein in the fluid sample is directly related. The amount of platelet granule protein is determined from a standard curve. In an alternative immunochromatographic assay, the fluid sample containing platelet granule protein is applied directly to the detection zone of the apparatus. In this embodiment, the detection reagent is antibody to the platelet granule protein of interest. The apparatus in maintained under appropriate conditions so that platelet granule protein of interest in the fluid sample interacts with the detection reagent, and is immobilized in the detection zone. Water or an appropriate buffer is then added to the application point of the membrane, to mobilize the antibody-coated particles, which are moved by capillary action into the detection zone. The apparatus is further maintained under conditions which allow interaction of the antibody-coated particles with platelet granule protein of interest that is immobilized in the detection zone. Interaction of the antibody-coated particles with immobilized platelet granule protein arrests movement of the antibody-coated particles. The amount of platelet granule protein of interest in the fluid sample is related to the amount of antibody-coated particles that are arrested in the detection zone, and is determined from a standard curve. The standard curve for platelet granule protein is generated by preparing a series of control samples of known concentrations of platelet granule protein in serum or platelet-poor plasma containing no detectable platelet granule protein. The quantitative immunochromatographic assay is performed on the series of control samples; the amount of detection-reagent-particles complexes in the detection zone is determined for each control sample; and the values are plotted as a function of the concentration of platelet granule protein included m the control samples. Alternatively, blood samples having known numbers of platelets can be used as control samples, and the amount of platelet granule protein plotted against platelet count, in a similar manner as described above for the ELISA. More detailed teachings of quantitative immunochromatographic assays are described in U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 08/625,048 (Attorney Docket Number UBC95-095) , entitled "Quantitative Immunochromatographic Assays", filed on March 29, 1996, the entire teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. The invention is now further illustrated by the following Examples, which are not intended to be limiting in any way. EXAMPLE 1 Isolation of Thrombospondin for Development of ELISA Assay Purified thrombospondin was isolated from fresh platelets obtained as platelet concentrates prepared from anticoagulated blood (Canadian Red Cross Society Blood Services, Vancouver Centre) . Platelet concentrates can be prepared as described in the American Association of Blood Banks Technical Manual, 11th edition (Walker, R.H. (ed) , Bethesda, MD, 1993) . Thrombospondin was isolated using a modified protocol of the method described by Slayter {Methods in Enzymology 169: 251-268 (1989)). Briefly, a single preparation started with four units of platelets which were diluted by 20% in acid citrate dextrose. After low speed centrifugation to remove contaminating red cells, the platelets were pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline containing glucose, pH 6.5 (0.15 M NaCl, 4.3 mM K,HP0 4 , 4.3 mM Na 2 HP0 4 , 24 mM NaH 2 P0 4 and 5 mM glucose) . After two washes in this buffer, platelets were resuspended in 25 ml of Tris-saline with glucose, pH 7.5 (20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, 5 mM glucose) and pH was adjusted to 7.5, if necessary. The platelet suspension was warmed to 37 G C and 75 U of thrombin were added. After a two minute incubation, thrombin and any released platelet proteases were inhibited by the addition of 6 U/ml hirudin, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1 mg/ml leupeptin, 2 ug/ml aprotinin and 1 mM EDTA. The platelets were removed by centrifugation and the supernatant fluid concentrated 2-3 fold. This concentrated platelet releasate was applied to a Sepharose 4B gel filtration column (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) equilibrated in Tris-saline containing 1 mM EDTA. Thrombospondin positive fractions were pooled and purification assessed by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Laem li, U.K. and M. Favre, J. Mol . Biol . 80 : 575 (1973)). Confirmation of the protein as thrombospondin was obtained by Western blotting (Towbin, H. et al . , Proc . Na tl . Acad. Sci . USA 76:4350 (1979)). Protein concentrations were determined by bichinchonic acid assay (Pierce Chemicals, Rockford, IL) . If the preparation was not sufficiently pure, the material was passed through a heparin-Sepharose column (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) to remove impurities. In general, sufficient purity was achieved in the gel filtration step alone. The average yield of purified thrombospondin from 4 units of platelets is approximately 2-3 mg. Exam le 2 Development of ET.TSA Assay for Thrombospondin A direct capture, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was initially developed to assay column fractions for thrombospondin. A polyclonal ammonium sulphate fraction (approximately 80% IgG) of thrombospondin antibody was used to coat ELISA plates and was sufficient to follow thrombospondin purification. When it was calibrated with the standard thrombospondin it was found to give inconsistent results, perhaps due to plate variation and age. Immulon 4 plates were ordered and the coating and blocking procedure standardized, as follows: 20 μg/ml Ab overnight at 4°C; wash three times with blocking buffer consisting of Tris buffered saline (TBS) plus 3% BSA; then block with blocking buffer for one hour at room temperature. The coated plates were incubated with thrombospondin standards in buffer overnight at 4°C, washed to remove unbound protein, and then reacted with Sigma monoclonal Ab (1:1000) and developed with alkaline phosphatase-conηugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:6,000; one hour at room temperature) . A strong signal and a smooth, reproducible standard curve were obtained but the curve flattened at higher concentrations (Figure 1) . When serum dilutions were used in the above ELISA, a smooth dilution curve was obtained when the serum was diluted with buffer 1:1 or more; undiluted serum strongly reduced the signal. Because it was desirable to use the assay directly on whole clotted blood, a variety of experiments were designed to examine the problem of reduced signal with undiluted serum. It was found that, when a standard curve of thrombospondin was run in buffer, after the plates as coated were incubated overnight with thrombospondin-depleted serum (made by running serum through a heparin affinity column) and then washed, the signal was reduced by approximately 50% compared to a standard curve run on plates not incubated in serum. These results suggested that the serum was removing antibody from the plate by competitive adsorption (Figure 2) . To solve this problem, a competitive inhibition ELISA assay was performed, which relied on the inhibition of anti-thrombospondin antibody binding to a thrombospondin- coated microtitre well by any thrombospondin present in a sample of serum from clotted blood, or any other blood sample in which the platelets have been stimulated to release their contents. Thrombospondin, rather than IgG, was adsorbed to the ELISA plates. Thrombospondin levels in solution were assayed by incubating the monoclonal antibody with the test solution before exposing the test solution to the plate. The concentration of thrombospondin in solution determined the number of monoclonal antibodies that were bound up by thrombospondin and thus unable to bind to thrombospondin on the plate. The ELISA signal was thereby reduced by an amount that is directly related to the thrombospondin concentration in the test solution. The advantage of this approach is that thrombospondin is a larger, "stickier" molecule than IgG and was expected to adsorb more strongly to the wells. This approach proved successful in reducing the problem of reduced signal when whole blood samples were used. To perform the competitive inhibition ELISA, plates were coated with 10 μg/ml of thrombospondin, isolated as described in Example 1. Plates were incubated overnight at 4°C, then washed and blocked by incubating in Tris-buffered saline containing 3% bovine serum albumin for one hour at room temperature. Test solutions were incubated with 1:1000 dilutions of ascites fluid containing monoclonal anti-thrombospondin antibody (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) for 20 minutes at room temperature, then exposed to the coated plates for 45 minutes at room temperature, washed and developed. The resulting inhibition standard curve is shown in Figure 3. This inhibition standard curve covers the entire range anticipated from clotted whole bloods. The inhibition assay performs similarly well in the presence of whole serum (data not shown) . The important factors identified in the development of the inhibition ELISA were the affinity of the monoclonal antibody, which influences the appropriate concentration in the test, and the anticipated amount of thrombospondin to be detected. Initially this assay was optimized using different concentrations of antibody, and different concentrations of thrombospondin in a matrix design. The concentration of antibody was chosen that gave a steep curve at concentrations of thrombospondin expected in samples with a platelet count within the normal range (150 - 300 x lOVL) . The assay was also set up at a lower concentration of antibody that would provide appropriate discrimination of platelet counts in thrombocytopenic samples (10 - 150 x 10 9 /L) . These antibody binding studies predicted that the thrombospondin ELISA accurately estimates platelet count in either a clinically normal, or clinically abnormal, range. Example 3 Correlation Between Platelet Count, and Thrombospondin Concentration To demonstrate that the immunoassay for thrombospondin can be interpreted to give a measure of the platelet count in the donor's blood, experiments were done in which fresh citrated platelet-poor plasma was isolated and mixed in various proportions with citrated whole blood from a donor with a naturally high (but within normal range) platelet count, thus varying the platelet count in whole blood. Calcium (20 mM final concentration, added as 1 M CaCl 2 ) was then added to clot the blood and release thrombospondin into the serum. Serum was isolated by centrifugation and duplicate 100 μl samples incubated with 10 μl of 1:100 dilution of ascites fluid containing anti- thrombospondin antibodies (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) fluid as above. The competitive inhibition ELISA was then performed. A tube of blood from the same donor was also taken into EDTA and submitted to the Hematology laboratory for routine platelet counting by the Model T660 or Model STCKR Coulter Counter (Coulter, Hialeah, FL) . Utilizing a standard curve generated on the same plate with purified thrombospondin, the OD resulting from each platelet concentration, calculated from the whole blood count, was interpreted to give the thrombospondin concentration in serum. Both the OD and the thrombospondin concentration interpreted from the standard curve are plotted as a function of the platelet count determined by the Coulter Counter (Figure 4) . It is seen that a smooth curve is obtained, implying that the OD values can readily be interpreted in terms of platelet count with the use of the standard curve. In order to examine the variation in the ability of the thrombospondin ELISA to measure platelet counts over a population, blood samples were drawn initially from five normal donors (the "initial study") . In each case samples were submitted for platelet counts by the Hematology Laboratory. One tube from each donor was allowed to clot naturally, with no additives, and each was subjected to the thrombospondin competitive ELISA described above. The results, shown in Figure 5, indicated that agreement between the Counter and thrombospondin ELISA results in the initial study is quite good for all donors, demonstrating that the ELISA works well in whole serum. Hence, adsorption of TSP to polystyrene plates was not significantly reversed by exposure to serum for 45 minutes at room temperature. A second, larger study was undertaken on a larger population of 26 normal donors. The last of the available isolated thrombospondin was used for the study, as there was insufficient commercial material available at that time. Enough purified thrombospondin was available to coat the plates according to the established protocol, but the amount was insufficient to run a standard curve on thrombospondin in buffer to determine the optimal concentration of antibody. This would have been desirable since a new batch of ascites fluid (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) containing the anti-thrombospondin monoclonal antibody was used. It was assumed that this material would have the same concentration dependence as the antibody used to produce the results shown in Figure 5. Hence, it was used at the recommended dilution. The same procedure as followed in generating Figure 5 was used: the calibration curve to convert OD to platelet number was generated directly from measurements on a series of dilutions of citrated whole blood with citrated platelet-poor plasma, followed by re-calcification to initiate clotting and release the thrombospondin. The result is shown in Figure 6. Closed squares represent normal donors. It is seen that the curve is of the expected shape, the OD decreasing as the platelet number (and hence TSP concentration) increases. However, the variation in OD obtained in the platelet concentration range associated with the normal population values, from 140 to 400 x lOVL, is quite small for the antibody concentration chosen. This means that under the conditions used the test will be very sensitive in the region of abnormally low platelet count but fairly insensitive to variations in platelet numbers in the normal range. Because it is necessary to run the calibration curve and the samples to be analyzed under the same conditions, all 26 normal donors were drawn the same morning and processed that afternoon and night. Hence, the calibration samples were run on the same plate and at the same time as the other 26 samples. It therefore was not possible to adjust the antibody concentration and re-run the set. The low sensitivity over the normal range shown by the calibration curve is reflected in the results obtained on the 26 samples assayed. While the difference between the average value of the Counter (261 x 10 9 /L) and ELISA (300 x 10 9 /L) values (excluding sample 17 discussed below) was 15% of the Coulter mean, it is clear that the ELISA tended to be higher than the Coulter values. It is expected that this discrepancy will largely disappear with a more appropriate choice of antibody concentration. However, part of the difference between the ELISA and Coulter results for normal donors may be significant. Sample 17 gave the biggest difference between the two measurements, the Counter giving 164 x 10 9 /L while the ELISA value was 324 x 10 9 /L. On examination of the light scattering distribution from the Coulter Counter it was found that this sample showed evidence of platelet aggregation, moving a significant fraction of the population out of the platelet counting window into he white cell window, resulting in a significant underestimate in the platelet count. Some of the other samples with large discrepancies may well have suffered from the same problem although only with sample 17 was the peak associated with platelet aggregates large enough to be flagged by the Coulter's software. Platelet counts are not identical from counter to counter and depend onto a certain degree on the setting of cutoffs to avoid counting other cell types, thus leading to underestimates if platelet aggregation is present. The ELISA, on the other hand, is not affected by platelet aggregation and gave a higher, and much more reliable value. This emphasizes that the immunoassay approach should provide more reliable platelet counts for abnormal, aggregated specimens which produce falsely low values in the Coulter Counter. In a third study, blood samples from 10 patients with thrombocytopenia due to impaired platelet production were tested in the ELISA assay in parallel with samples from six normal donors. By Coulter analysis, the platelet counts in these patients ranged from 8 x 10 9 to 78 x 10 9 (where normal is >150 x 10 9 ) . The ELISA was carried out as described above, and a standard curve using purified thrombospondin was run on the same plate. Results are shown in Figure 6, where open squares are donors with thrombocytopenia. Figure 6 shows the relationship between the platelet count predicted by the thrombospondin inhibition ELISA and that of the Coulter STCKR for thrombocytopenic patients. As predicted from antibody binding studies described above, the thrombospondin ELISA was optimized to accurately estimate the platelet count when the platelet count is in the clinically abnormal range. Under these ELISA conditions, the accuracy of the count in abnormal samples is greater than that in samples where the platelet count is in the normal range. The correlation coefficient for the thrombospondin ELISA and the Coulter count in thrombocytopenic patients was 0.92. Example 4 Correlation Between Platelet Count and Concentration of Platelet. Factor 4 or B-thromboαlobulin Blood samples were collected from 32 donors with varying platelet counts, both within the normal range and below the normal range (thrombocytopenic samples). Two specimens were collected: one EDTA blood sample was used to determine the platelet count using a standard complete blood count instrument (Coulter STCKR) , and one sample was used to generate a platelet-rich plasma sample. The sample used to generate the platelet-rich plasma sample was collected without any anticoagulant so that the clotting reaction would occur and the platelets would be activated to release the contents of their granules. The serum samples were used to determine the amount of the platelet granule proteins, platelet factor 4 (PF4) and β- thromboglobulin, that was released from the platelets. This quantity was determined for both proteins using ELISA assays. Results, reported in IU/ml, demonstrate that there is a strong positive correlation between the platelet count and the amount of PF4 (Figure 7; correlation coefficient = 0.94), and β-thromboglobulin (Figure 8; correlation coefficient = 0.92) . Thus, for the first time, Applicants have demonstrated a direct correlation between three different platelet granule protein, thrombospondin, platelet factor 4, and β-thromboglobulin, which is consistent both in normal donors and in donors with thrombocytopenia. Equivalents Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described specifically herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed in the scope of the following claims.

Claims: £LΔIMS. What is claimed is: 1. A method of measuring the platelet count of an individual, comprising the steps of: a. releasing platelet granule protein from platelets in a blood sample from the individual, thereby generating a test sample containing released platelet granule protein; b. measuring the amount of released platelet granule protein in the test sample; and c. determining the platelet count, based on the amount of released platelet granule protein in the test sample. The method of Claim 1, wherein the platelet granule protein is selected from the group consisting of: thrombospondin, platelet factor 4, and β- thromboglobulin. The method of Claim 1, wherein the released platelet granule protein is measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. 4. The method of Claim 1, wherein the released platelet granule protein is measured using a quantitative immunochromatographic assay. 5. The method of Claim 4 wherein the immunochromatographic assay comprises the steps of: a. supplying a rapid antigen measurement platform, the platform comprising a membrane strip, the membrane strip comprising an application point, a contact region, and a detection zone, wherein the contact region is between the application point and the detection zone; b. contacting the application point of the membrane strip with the test sample; c. maintaining the membrane strip under conditions which are sufficient to allow fluid in the test sample to transport released platelet granule protein by capillary action through the strip to the contact region, the contact region having a population of antibody-coated particles imbedded therein, wherein the antibody is an antibody to platelet granule protein; d. further maintaining the membrane strip under conditions which are sufficient to allow platelet granule protein to bind to the antibody-coated particles, thereby generating contacted antibody- coated particles; to allow fluid to transport the contacted antibody-coated particles by capillary action through the strip to the detection zone, the detection zone having a detection reagent immobilized thereon; and to allow the detection reagent to interact with contacted antibody-coated particles, thereby generating detection-reagent- particle complexes; and e. Detecting the amount of detection-reagent-particle complexes m the detection zone, wherein the amount of platelet granule protein in the blood sample is related to the amount of detection-reagent- particle complexes in the detection zone. 6. The method of Claim 5, wherein the detection reagent is platelet granule protein. 7. The method of Claim 5, wherein the detection reagent is an antibody to platelet granule protein. 8. The method of Claim 5, wherein the rapid antigen measurement platform further comprises an application pad that covers the application point. 9. The method of Claim 8, wherein platelet granule protein is released from platelets in the blood sample by contacting the application pad with the blood sample. 10. The method of Claim 1, wherein the released platelet granule protein is measured using non-solid phase nephelometry. 11. The method of Claim 1, wherein the platelet count is calculated from a standard curve. 12. A method of measuring the platelet count of an individual, comprising the steps of: a. isolating a platelet-rich plasma sample from a blood sample from the individual; b. releasing platelet granule protein from platelets in the platelet-rich plasma sample, thereby generating a test sample compπsing released platelet granule protein; c. measuring the amount of released platelet granule protein in the test sample; and d. calculating the platelet count, based on the amount of released platelet granule protein in the test sample. 13. The method of Claim 12, wherein the platelet granule protein is selected from the group consisting of: thrombospondin, platelet factor 4, and β- thromboglobulm. 14. The method of Claim 11, wherein the released platelet granule protein is measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. 15. The method of Claim 12, wherein the released platelet granule protein is measured using a quantitative immunochromatographic assay. 16. The method of Claim 15, wherein the immunochromatographic assay comprises the steps of: a. supplying a rapid antigen measurement platform, the platform comprising a membrane strip, the membrane strip comprising an application point, a contact region, and a detection zone, wherein the contact region is between the application point and the detection zone; b. contacting the application point of the membrane strip with the test sample; c. maintaining the membrane strip under conditions which are sufficient to allow fluid in the test sample to transport released platelet granule protein by capillary action through the strip to the contact region, the contact region having a population of antibody-coated particles imbedded therein, wherein the antibody is an antibody to platelet granule protein; d. further maintaining the membrane strip under conditions which are sufficient to allow platelet granule protein to bind to the antibody-coated particles, thereby generating contacted antibody-coated particles; to allow fluid to transport the contacted antibody-coated particles by capillary action through the strip to the detection zone, the detection zone having a detection reagent immobilized thereon; and to allow the detection reagent to interact with contacted antibody-coated particles, thereby generating detection-reagent- particle complexes; and e. detecting the amount of detection-reagent- particle complexes in the detection zone, wherein the amount of platelet granule protein in the blood sample is related to the amount of detection-reagent-particle complexes in the detection zone. 17. The method of Claim 16, wherein the detection reagent is platelet granule protein. 18. The method of Claim 16, wherein the detection reagent is an antibody to platelet granule protein. 19. The method of Claim 16, wherein the rapid antigen measurement platform further comprises an application pad that covers the application point. 20. The method of Claim 19, wherein platelet granule protein is released from platelets in the blood sample by contacting the application pad with the blood sample. 21. The method of Claim 12, wherein the released platelet granule protein is measured using non-solid phase nephelometry. 22. The method of Claim 12, wherein the platelet count is calculated from a standard curve.

Inventors: BROOKS DONALD ELLIOTT, DEVINE DANA, BROOKS, DONALD, ELLIOTT, DEVINE, DANA
Applicants: BROOKS DONALD ELLIOTT, DEVINE DANA, HAMILTON BROOK SMITH & REYNOLD, UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA, BROOKS, DONALD, ELLIOTT, DEVINE, DANA, HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C., UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Application year: 1997
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: C12Q1, G01N15, G01N33