Statistical database correction of alphanumeric account numbers for speech recognition

Abstract: A method and apparatus for recognizing an identifier entered by a user. A caller enters a predetermined identifier through a voice input device (15) or a touch-tone keypad of a telephone handset. A signal representing the entered identifier is transmitted to a remote recognizer (30), which responds to the identifier signal by producing a recognized output intended to match the entered identifier. The present invention compares this recognized identifier with a list (35) of valid reference identifiers to determine which one of these reference identifiers most likely matches the entered identifier. In performing this determination, the present invention employs a confusion matrix (45), which is an arrangement of probabilities that indicate the likelihood that a given character in a particular character position of the reference identifier would be recognized by the recognizer as a character in the corresponding character position of the recognized identifier. This determination yields an identifier recognition probability for every reference identifier, and the present invention selects the reference identifier with the highest identifier recognition probability as most likely corresponding to the entered identifier.

Description: Background of the Invention The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for recognizing an identifier that is entered into a system by a user, and in particular, to a method and apparatus that recognizes such an input identifier on the basis of a probability determination that selects, from among a plurality of predetermined reference identifiers, a reference identifier that has the highest probability of matching the input identifier. Most institutions, such as banks and department stores, allow customers to access over the telephone a wide variety of services and account information. Before the advent of touch-tone telephones, a customer would obtain these services and information through interacting with a live operator. As touch-tone telephones became more prevalent in homes, these institutions began switching to automated customer-access systems. After dialing a telephone number, a customer using such systems would be asked to enter an account number or identifier. As used herein, the terms "account number" and "identifier" are used interchangeably, and they refer to a string of characters that may comprise a plurality of letters, numbers, or both. Furthermore, as used herein, an identifier may be used not only to identify a user, but also may be used as an identifier for identifying a particular product or service offered by an institution. In the first generation of automated customer-access systems, a user would enter such an identifier by sequentially pressing a series of keys provided on the telephone keypad. Each pressed key would correspond to a different character in the identifier. The pressing of these keys would produce a series of tones that would be provided over a telephone network to the institution. At the institution, the series of tones would be decoded to produce the entered identifier, and if the identifier entered by the user was determined to correspond to a valid identifier, then the user would be allowed to enter commands, again through the telephone keypad, that would provide access to whatever services would be offered by the institution. The next generation of automated customer-access systems eliminates the use of telephone keypads to verify the identity of a valid user. Instead of entering an identifier through a telephone keypad, a user would be prompted to speak the identifier into the telephone handset. For example, the user may speak into the telephone the identifier "JB123E". The user's voice signal would be transmitted over the phone lines to the financial institution, which would employ a speech recognition system to produce a recognized identifier that is intended to correspond exactly to the identifier spoken by the user. Nevertheless, such exact correspondence is quite difficult to attain, mostly due to the deterioration of voice signals that routinely occurs over conventional telephone lines. In particular, as a voice signal is transmitted to a remote location, conventional telephone lines introduce into such signals noise and restrictive band limitations. Such a deterioration present in a voice signal may cause a remote speech recognizer to produce a recognized output that does not correspond to the spoken identifier. Because of the limitations introduced into the voice signal by the telephone lines, the speech recognizer may confuse similar sounding letters and numbers. Thus, a speech recognizer may confuse the letter "A" with the number "8", the letter "K", or the letter "J". Similarly, the speech recognizer may confuse the letter "C" with the letter "D" or the number "3". For example, given that a user speaks the identifier "JB123E" into a telephone, the speech recognizer may produce "AE 123D" as an output. Accordingly, a need exists to enhance the accuracy of such speech recognition systems and overcome the limitations introduced into voice signals by typical communication lines, such as, for example, conventional telephone lines. Similarly, touch-tone recognition systems also mistakenly recognize the wrong identifier. Accordingly, a need also exists to enhance the accuracy of such touch-tone recognition systems. WO 96/36042 describes a method and apparatus for identifying any one of a plurality of words, each word having an audible form represented by a sequence of spoken speech elements picked up by a microphone. This system includes a CPU for controlling system operation, a first unit for storing the data representing the plurality of words, a second unit for storing the data used to calculate probabilities. The spoken speech elements are converted into an analog signal and converted into digital signals by an interface, and an interpreter is connected to said interface to receive and interpret the digital signals to produce an identification of each spoken speech element, and a calculating unit uses the probabilities produced from data in said second unit and compares the interpreted speech elements with the data stored in said first unit in order to identify the word represented by the stored data which corresponds to the spoken speech elements. EP-A-0,319,193 describes a method and apparatus for identifying letters entered on DTMF pushbuttons, in which the identity of a word entered on DTMF (Dual Tone Multi-Frequency) pushbuttons is determined by identifying letters according to their frequency in groups of 2s and 3s and up to n-letter groups. US 5,577,164 describes an incorrect voice command recognition prevention and recovery processing method and apparatus, in which information for identifying whether a word should be recognized in the next recognition operation is stored in a recognition dictionary. Summary of the Invention In order to overcome these deficiencies, the present invention is directed to a method and apparatus as set out in the accompanying claims. Brief Description of the Drawings Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, together with the drawings, in which: Fig. 1 shows a block diagram of a speech recognition system in accordance with the present invention; Fig. 2 shows a confusion matrix for arranging a plurality of probabilities indicative of the likelihood that a particular character in a reference identifier was spoken by a user; Fig. 3 shows a first predetermined identifier grammar; Fig. 4 shows a second predetermined identifier grammar; Fig. 5 shows a flow diagram corresponding to a first embodiment for determining which reference identifier was most likely spoken by a user; Fig. 6 shows a flow diagram corresponding to a second embodiment for determining which reference identifier was most likely spoken by a user; Fig. 7 shows a flow diagram corresponding to a third embodiment for determining which reference identifier was most likely spoken by a user; Fig. 8 shows a block diagram of a touch-tone recognition system in accordance with the present invention; and Figs. 9(a) and 9(b) illustrate confusion matrices used in conjunction with the system of Fig. 8. Detailed Description of the Invention Fig. 1 illustrates a system that implements the speech recognition routine of the present invention. The system of Fig. 1 is merely an example of one kind of system that is capable of supporting the present speech recognition routine, and it should be appreciated that the present speech recognition routine is compatible with numerous other applications. The system 10 of Fig. 1 includes a voice input/output device 15, which may comprise a conventional telephone or microphone. A user wishing to access a particular service provided by the system would be prompted to speak into voice input/output device 15 a predetermined identifier. For purposes of this discussion, the user shall be assumed to speak a valid identifier into device 10. This voice signal can be carried over a telephone line to a public telephone network interface 65, which interfaces the voice signal generated by voice input/output device 10 to the remaining components of the speech recognition system. Of course, any wired or wireless connection could convey the voice signal to the speech recognition system. The system of Fig. 1 further includes an A/D converter 20, which converts the analog voice signal provided by interface 65 into a digital signal. A/D converter 20 supplies the digitized voice signal to speech recognizer 30, which may comprise, for example, a HARK 3.0 recognizer, which is manufactured by BBN Co.. After employing a recognition routine, for example, the Hidden Markov Model, speech recognizer 30 provides as an output a recognized identifier, which may or may not correspond to the identifier that the user spoke into the telephone. The recognized output is provided to an input of CPU 40. CPU 40 is configured to determine whether the recognized identifier corresponds to any one of a plurality of valid identifiers stored in database 35, which may comprise a hard disk or any other suitable storage medium capable of storing a large number of account numbers. The identifier recognition routine that CPU 40 uses to verify the validity of a recognized identifier is stored in identifier verification module 75. Used in conjunction with the routine of module 75 is a confusion matrix, which is stored in memory 45 and which shall be described along with the routine of module 75 soon hereafter. CPU 40 controls a voice prompt device 60, which may comprise DIALOGIC telephone interface cards. CPU 40 causes prompt device 60 to issue voice inquiries to a user at voice input/output device 15. For example, the voice prompt device 60 may issue an inquiry such as "Please tell me your identifier". The system of Fig. 1 also includes a data input device 50, such as a keyboard, a CD-ROM drive, or a floppy drive, and the system of Fig. 1 is also provided with a display 55. Fig. 2 illustrates a confusion matrix that is used by CPU 40 to validate the veracity of a recognized identifier provided by speech recognizer 30. For the example provided in Fig. 2, the identifier grammar shall be LLNNNE. That is, each one of the valid identifiers stored in database 35 is six characters long in which the first two character positions may comprise only letters of the alphabet, the third through fifth character positions may comprise only numerals 0-9, and the last character position may comprise either a letter or a numeral. In order to avoid confusing the letter "O" with the numeral "0", the identifier grammar may be configured to exclude the letter "O" as a possible letter to be used in the first, second, or last character positions, and recognizer 30 would be configured to recognize the numeral "0" when it is spoken by a user either as "oh" or "zero". Of course, the characters that constitute the identifier grammar can be configured to be of whatever length and may comprise any combination of letters, numerals, or both. Since illustrating a confusion matrix for the entire alphabet is not necessary to explain the operation of the identifier recognition routine, the confusion matrix of Fig. 2 is limited to a portion of the alphabet. Furthermore, the matrix is not provided with every entry because the following discussion shall refer to a limited number of identifiers and the entries provided in the matrix correspond to those letters that are included in this limited group of identifiers. Thus, all the blanks in Fig. 2 should be considered to be zero. Of course, when the system of the present invention is implemented, the confusion matrix would be provided with a complete set of entries and the database would be provided with a large amount of identifiers, for example, 100,000. The confusion matrix of Fig. 2 is read as follows: the vertical columns correspond to letters and numbers that were recognized by recognizer 30, and the horizontal rows correspond to letters and numbers spoken into the telephone. Of course, the confusion matrix of Fig. 2 may be configured in reverse, in which the horizontal rows correspond to letters and numbers recognized by recognizer 30, and in which the vertical columns correspond to letters and numbers spoken into the telephone. The decimals that are provided in the confusion matrix represent different probabilities. For example, based on the confusion matrix of Fig. 2, given that "A" is recognized by recognizer 30, the probability that "A" was spoken by a user into a telephone is 50%. For the recognized letter "A", there is also a probability of 30% that "J" was spoken, and there is a probability of 20% that "8" was spoken when "A" was recognized. The particular probabilities that are provided in Fig. 2 are determined in advance through experimentation, and they are tailored to suit the particular recognizer 30 that is used in the system of Fig. 1. Thus, when a particular recognizer is to be used in the system of Fig. 1, a test group of persons repetitively provides pronunciations of each of the letters and numerals, and the recognized output of recognizer 30 for each pronunciation is recorded. In order that the results of these tests incorporate the influence of the noise and bandwidth limitations that affect speech recognizers operating under real conditions when receiving voice signals from a telephone line, the vocal pronunciations of this test group of persons may be provided to the speech recognizer over a telephone line. From these various "trial runs" of the recognizer 30, the probabilities that characterize the recognition accuracy of the recognizer are established, and these probabilities can be entered as a confusion matrix into memory 45 through data input device 50. Since different recognizers exhibit different recognition accuracies, if recognizer 30 is to be replaced with a different recognizer, than a confusion matrix corresponding to the replacement recognizer must be entered into memory 45. Or alternatively, memory 45 may store in advance a plurality of predetermined confusion matrices corresponding to different recognizers, so that when a replacement recognizer is implemented, the corresponding confusion matrix may be selected by entering a command through input device 50. It should be noted that the probabilities of a confusion matrix need not be arranged in matrix form, but may be arranged as an array, or as any other data structure capable of associating a recognized and spoken character in terms of a probability. Another alternative embodiment is shown in Fig. 3, in which a separate confusion matrix is provided for each portion of the code. For example, if the predetermined identifier grammar described above is used, then CPU 40 would access from memory 45 (1) a "letters only" confusion matrix when analyzing the first two character positions (2) a "numbers only" confusion matrix for the next three character positions, and a "numbers and letters" confusion matrix, such as the one in Fig. 2, for the last character position. By using such separate confusion matrices, the recognition accuracy of the overall system is improved. For example, when analyzing a "letters only" character position, the "letters only" confusion matrix will not allow for the possibility that a recognized "A" was mistaken by recognizer 30 for a spoken "8". Thus, the probability that a spoken "A" is actually recognized as an "A" increases because one possibly confusing character, the number "8", has been eliminated from consideration. Of course, Fig. 3 does not illustrate the only possible correspondence between confusion matrices and character positions in a character string. As Fig. 4 illustrates, each character position in a predetermined grammar may be assigned its own confusion matrix. Furthermore, each particular character position may be constrained as to the number of possible characters that can occupy that position. For example, in Fig. 4, the only characters that can occupy the first character position are the letters "A" through "M"; the only characters that can occupy the second character position are the letters "N" through "Z"; the only characters that can occupy the third character position are the numbers "0" through "3"; the only characters that can occupy the fourth character position are the numbers "4" through "6"; the only characters that can occupy the fifth character position are the numbers "7" through "9"; and the last character position would not be limited as to which letters or numbers can permissibly occupy that last position. When the predetermined grammar of the identifier is limited as in Fig. 4, each character position is assigned a confusion matrix that is matched to the particular constraints placed on the corresponding character position. Thus, the first character position corresponds to a confusion matrix that accounts only for the possibility that letters A through M could have been spoken; the second character position corresponds to a confusion matrix that accounts only for the possibility that letters N through Z could have been spoken; the third character position corresponds to a confusion matrix that accounts only for the possibility that numbers "0" through "3" were spoken; the fourth character position corresponds to a confusion matrix that accounts only for the possibility that numbers "4" through "6" were spoken; the fifth character position corresponds to a confusion matrix that accounts only for the possibility that the numbers "7" through "9" were spoken; and the sixth character position corresponds to a confusion matrix that takes into account both letters and numbers. The various confusion matrices of Figs. 3 and 4 may be stored in advance in memory 45, and CPU 40 may automatically switch among them, depending on which predetermined grammar is used and which character position is being currently analyzed. The flow charts of Figs. 5-7 illustrate the operation of CPU 40 in accordance with various identifier verification routines stored in module 75. Depending on the particular implementation, CPU 40 may select among these stored routines either automatically or based on a command entered through data input device 50. With respect to Fig. 5, voice prompt device 60, under the control of CPU 40, prompts the user to speak his identifier (step 100). For illustrative purposes, the spoken identifier shall be assumed to be AE123D and it is assumed to be valid. The voice signal corresponding to this identifier is supplied through interface 65 to A/D converter 20, which generates a digitized voice signal corresponding to the spoken identifier. This digitized voice signal is supplied to recognizer 30, which produces a digital code (recognized identifier) that may or may not include each character of the identifier that was spoken by the user (step 110). In this example, the recognized identifier shall be assumed to be JB123E. CPU 40 then creates a list of reference identifiers from the identifiers stored in database 35 (step 120). As shall be explained later, this list may or may not include every identifier stored in database 35. After generating the list of reference identifiers, CPU 40 goes to the first reference identifier in the list (step 130), and in particular, to the first character in the recognized and reference identifiers (step 140). For the sake of simplicity, assume that the first identifier in the list is AE123D. CPU 40 then obtains from memory 45 a confusion matrix. Given that J, the first character in the recognized identifier, was recognized, CPU 40 determines from the confusion matrix the probability that A was spoken (step 150). As explained before, the confusion matrix used may be one that encompasses letters or numbers or both, or one that encompasses a subset of letters or numbers. After obtaining such a probability, CPU 40 determines whether all the character positions of the reference and recognized identifiers have been analyzed (step 160). If not, CPU 40 moves to the next character position for both the recognized and reference identifiers (step 165) and consults the confusion matrix again to determine the probability of recognizing the particular character of the recognized identifier when the corresponding character of the reference identifier was spoken. This procedure is carried out until a probability is determined for every character position. After the last character positions have been analyzed, CPU 40 multiplies all the obtained probabilities for each character position (step 170). The result of this multiplication represents, given that the recognized identifier was recognized, the probability that the reference identifier used in this iteration was actually spoken. This probability is referred to as an identifier recognition probability. Of course, the identifier recognition probability may be determined in ways other than multiplication of the confusion matrix probabilities. The present invention is deemed to encompass alternative methods of determining identifier recognition probabilities that are based on confusion matrix probabilities. In the example given above, given that JB123E is recognized, the probability that AE123E is spoken may be determined to be 30%, based on the confusion matrix. After determining this probability, CPU 40 then goes to the next reference identifier (step 185), and repeats steps 140-170 to obtain another probability. This process is repeated until an identifier recognition probability has been determined for every reference identifier in the list. Once all these probabilities have been determined, CPU 40 determines the reference identifier that has been assigned the highest probability (step 190). CPU 40 then causes voice prompt device 60 to ask the user if the reference identifier with the highest probability matches the identifier originally spoken by the user (Step 200). If a match exists, then the speech recognition procedure ends and the user accesses the information or services to which his is entitled. It should be appreciated that selecting the reference identifier with the highest probability is not the only way to select the reference identifier that most likely matches the spoken identifier. The present invention is intended to encompass other techniques relying on probabilistic determinations to select such a reference identifier. If a match does not exist, then CPU 40 creates a new list of reference identifiers that excludes the most recently determined identifier with the highest probability (step 215). In step 215, CPU 40 also reinstates any previously determined "highest probability" identifiers. For example, if the first iteration of the procedure in Fig. 5 produces a mismatch based on reference identifier JD875C, then JD875C is excluded from being compared to a recognized identifier during a second iteration of the procedure of Fig. 5. If the second iteration produces a mismatch based on reference identifier BC421J, then in the third iteration, BC421J is excluded from consideration and JD875C is reinstated into the list of reference identifier. This reinstatement is done in case a user actually indicated in a previous iteration that a match did exist between the reinstated identifier and the spoken identifier, but the system erroneously understood this indication to mean that a mismatch existed. Thus, if a user indicated that a match existed based on identifier JD875C, but the system misunderstood the user to mean that a mismatch existed, identifier JD875C would be reconsidered again because of the reinstatement in step 215. Of course, this reconsideration would not occur until after another complete iteration is done without the identifier JD875C. That is, the user would indicate that the highest probability identifier in the next iteration is not the correct one, and the system would reinstate identifier JD875C in a subsequent iteration. Thus, the system would be provided with another opportunity to identify identifier JD875C as the one that the user spoke into the telephone. Once a new list is created (step 215), CPU 40 re-prompts the user to pronounce the identifier again. After speech recognizer 30 produces a recognized identifier, the procedure above for determining the highest probability identifier is repeated. The re-prompting step and the step of producing a second recognized identifier is optional, since the originally spoken identifier and recognized identifier can be compared to the new list. In another embodiment, the entire result of an iteration is discarded if all the calculated probabilities are below a certain threshold. As illustrated in Fig. 6, a user is prompted for an identifier (step 300). After producing a recognized identifier corresponding to the spoken identifier (step 310), CPU 40 determines an identifier recognition probability for each reference identifier in the same manner as illustrated in Fig. 5 (step 320). After determining a probability for every reference identifier, CPU 40 determines if any of these probabilities exceeds a predetermined threshold (step 330). The threshold is determined experimentally and is set low enough so that any probability falling below or matching the threshold would not be reasonably regarded as corresponding to a correctly recognized identifier. If no probability exceeds the predetermined threshold, then the procedure returns to step 300. If at least one probability exceeds the threshold, then the identifier corresponding to the highest among these probabilities is presented to the user (steps 340, 350). If the user indicates that a match exists (step 360), then the procedure ends (step 370). If no match exists, then the procedure begins again at step 300. Alternatively, as indicated in Fig. 7, CPU 40 can be configured to create a list of those reference identifiers, each of these reference identifiers corresponding to an identifier recognition probability that exceeds a predetermined threshold (step 440). The reference identifier in this list that corresponds to the highest identifier recognition probability is presented to the user (step 450). If the user indicates that a match does not exist (step 460), then instead of reprompting the user, CPU 40 presents the user with the identifier corresponding to the next highest probability in the list (step 490). Such a procedure could be repeated until the user indicated that a match existed (step 460) or until CPU 40 exhausted all the probabilities that exceeded the predetermined threshold (step 480). In yet another embodiment of the present invention, Fig. 8 illustrates a touch-tone recognition system 20 that also implements at least one confusion matrix in order to enhance the recognition accuracy of the system. The components in Figs. 1 and 8 that are referred to by the same reference character can be considered to be the same component. A user enters through touch-tone input device 115 an identifier that may comprise an alphanumeric string of characters. Touch-tone input device 115 may comprise the keypad of a typical touch-tone telephone. In this embodiment it shall be assumed, for exemplary purposes only, the key numbered "2" on the keypad corresponds to letters "A", "B", and "C"; that the key numbered "3" corresponds to letters "D", "E", and "F"; that the key numbered "4" corresponds to letters "G", "H", and "I"; that the key numbered "5" corresponds to letters "J", "K", and "L"; that the key numbered "6" corresponds to letters "M", "N", and "O"; that the key numbered "7" corresponds to letters "P", "Q", "R", and "S"; that the key numbered "8" corresponds to letters "T", "U", and "V"; and that the key numbered "9" corresponds to letters "W", "X", "Y", and "Z". Of course, this particular correspondence between numerical keys and alphabetical letters is only one of many possible arrangements that may be established in touch-tone recognition systems. Fig. 9(a) illustrates one possible confusion matrix that may be stored in confusion matrix memory 45 of system 20. The matrix shows several blocks of non-zero probabilities. For example, assuming that the intended character is a letter, pressing the key numbered "2" signifies the letters "A", "B", or "C". Since pressing this key may signify any of these letters, each letter has a 33% chance that it has been recognized correctly by recognizer 130. For keys "7" and "9", each of which corresponds to 4 letters, each of these letter has a the probability of 25% that it has been recognized correctly. Fig. 9(b) shows the confusion matrix for the numeric characters. Since each key on the keypad is assigned to only one number, there is a 100% chance that the touch-tone recognition system 20 will correctly recognize the number that was input into the system by the user. When the system of Fig. 8 is in operation, a user would enter an identifier through touch-tone input device 115. The identifier in this system may be defined according to the same grammar as the identifiers used in the system of Fig. 1. Touch-tone recognizer 130 would supply to processor 40 a string of alphanumeric character that purports to match the one supplied by the user. Processor 40 would verify the accuracy of this recognized identifier in the same way as the system of Fig. 1: by calculating for each reference identifier stored in database 35 a particular identifier recognition probability based on the recognized identifier and selecting from these reference identifiers the identifier most likely matching the input identifier. The selection of the closest reference identifier may be based, for example, on the reference identifier corresponding to the highest identifier recognition probability. Furthermore, the procedures outlined in Figs. 5-7 are capable of being implemented in the system of Fig. 8, the only difference being that the system of Fig. 8 requires a user to enter an identifier through a touch-tone telephone keypad. The speech recognition system and touch-tone recognition system of the present invention are not limited to accessing account information over a telephone, but instead may be applied to a wide variety of environments that require the validation of a user's identity or that require a user to identify a particular feature or service associated with the system. For example, the present invention may be implemented in a security system intended to limit access to a facility to only those persons that speak a valid identifier into a microphone installed at an entrance of the facility. Another possible implementation for the present invention is at a remote point-of-sale terminal or a remote money-access station, in which a customer's PIN number would be entered vocally through a microphone. Furthermore, each of the items stored in database 35 may be configured to identify a particular product or service that a user desires to purchase. Thus, in this configuration, a user calling a catalog retailer may identify each product that is to be purchased by a particular alphanumeric, numeric, or alphabetical code associated with that product. After a user enters such a product identification code into the telephone, the system of Fig. 1 would perform the identifier recognition described above to correctly identify the desired product or service.

Claims: A method of recognizing a set of alphanumeric characters spoken by a user, the method utilizing an automatic speech recognition ASR module (30) that recognizes the set of alphanumeric characters spoken by the user, and comparing the recognized set of characters with a plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters on a character-by-character basis to determine a probability that the ASR module (30) correctly recognized each spoken character, characterised by : a) constraining each character position in the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters to a subset of an alphabet or a subset of available numbers; b) associating a separate confusion matrix to each alphanumeric character in the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters according to the respectively constrained subset of an alphabet or the constrained subset of available numbers; and c) determining a probability of the ASR correctly interpreting each character of the spoken set of alphanumeric characters (130, 140, 150) utilizing the respective confusion matrix associated with each character in the plurality of stored sets of characters, wherein the probabilities associated with each character of the spoken set of alphanumeric characters are used to determine whether the spoken set of alphanumeric characters matches one of the plurality of stored sets of characters. The method of claim 1, further comprising: d) multiplying all obtained probabilities for each character of the spoken set of alphanumeric characters (170) to identify whether the spoken set of characters matches one of the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters. The method of claim 2, further comprising: e) identifying a probability for each set of the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters (180). The method of claim 3, further comprising: f) determining which set of the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters corresponds to the spoken set of alphanumeric characters based on the stored set of alphanumeric characters having the highest probability (190). The method of claim 4, further comprising: g) if the stored set of alphanumeric characters having the highest probability does not match the spoken set of alphanumeric characters, then generating a new plurality of sets of stored alphanumeric characters; h) excluding a most recent stored set of alphanumeric characters having the highest probability from the new plurality of sets of stored alphanumeric characters; and i) returning to step c) in claim 1 to determine the probability of the ASR correctly interpreting each character of the spoken set of alphanumeric characters (130, 140, 150) utilizing the respective confusion matrix associated with each character in the new plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters. The method of claim 5, further comprising: j) before implementing step i), reprompting the user to provide the spoken set of alphanumeric characters again. The method of claim 3, further comprising: if any probability associated with one of the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters is above a threshold value, presenting the stored set of characters having the highest probability to the user for confirmation (340, 350). The method of claim 3, further comprising: if no probability associated with one of the plurality of sets of alphanumeric characters exceeds a threshold value, then reprompting the user to provide again a spoken set of alphanumeric characters (300). The method of claim 3, further comprising: if the probability associated with a plurality of the stored sets of alphanumeric characters is above a threshold value, presenting each of the stored sets of alphanumeric characters above the threshold value to the user for confirmation (450). The method of claim 1, further comprising: storing in a memory each separate confusion matrix; and switching to each separate confusion matrix according to which character position is being analysed. An apparatus (10) for recognizing a set of alphanumeric characters spoken by a user, the apparatus having an automatic speech recognition ASR module (30) that is adapted to recognize the set of alphanumeric characters spoken by the user and to compare the recognized set of characters with a plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters on a character-by-character basis to determine a probability that the ASR module (30) correctly recognized each spoken character, characterized in that the apparatus comprises: a) means for constraining each character position in the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters to a subset of an alphabet or a subset of available numbers (80); b) means for associating a separate confusion matrix (45) to each alphanumeric character in the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters according to the respectively constrained subset of an alphabet or the constrained subset of available numbers; and c) means for determining a probability of the ASR correctly interpreting each character of the spoken set of alphanumeric characters (130, 140, 150) utilizing the respective confusion matrix associated with each character in the plurality of stored sets of characters, wherein the probabilities associated with each character of the spoken set of alphanumeric characters are used to determine whether the spoken set of alphanumeric characters matches one of the plurality of stored sets of characters. The apparatus (10) of claim 11, further comprising: d) means for multiplying all obtained probabilities for each character of the spoken set of alphanumeric characters (170) to identify whether the spoken set of characters matches one of the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters. The apparatus (10) of claim 12, further comprising: e) means for identifying a probability for each set of the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters (180). The apparatus (10) of claim 13, further comprising: f) means for determining which set of the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters corresponds to the spoken set of alphanumeric characters based on the stored set of alphanumeric characters having the highest probability (190). The apparatus (10) of claim 14, further comprising: g) means for generating a new plurality of sets of stored alphanumeric characters if the stored set of alphanumeric characters having the highest probability does not match the spoken set of alphanumeric characters; h) means for excluding a most recent stored set of alphanumeric characters having the highest probability from the new plurality of sets of stored alphanumeric characters; and i) means for determining the probability of the ASR correctly interpreting each character of the spoken set of alphanumeric characters (130, 140, 150) utilizing the respective confusion matrix associated with each character in the new plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters. The apparatus (10) of claim 15, further comprising: j) means for reprompting the user to provide the spoken set of alphanumeric characters again before determining whether the probability of the ASR correctly interpreting each character of the spoken set of alphanumeric characters (130, 140, 150) utilizing the respective confusion matrix associated with each character in the new plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters. The apparatus (10) of claim 13, further comprising: means for presenting the stored set of characters having the highest probability to the user for confirmation (340, 350) if any probability associated with one of the plurality of stored sets of alphanumeric characters is above a threshold value. The apparatus (10) of claim 13, further comprising: means for reprompting the user to provide again a spoken set of alphanumeric characters (300) if no probability associated with one of the plurality of sets of alphanumeric characters exceeds a threshold value. The apparatus (10) of claim 13, further comprising: means for presenting each of the stored sets of alphanumeric characters above the threshold value to the user for confirmation (450) if the probability associated with a plurality of the stored sets of alphanumeric characters is above a threshold value. The apparatus (10) of claim 11, further comprising: means for storing in a memory each separate confusion matrix; and means for switching to each separate confusion matrix according to which character position is being analysed.

Inventors: BROWN DEBORAH W, GOLDBERG RANDY G, MARCUS STEPHEN MICHAEL, ROSINSKI RICHARD R, BROWN, DEBORAH W., GOLDBERG, RANDY G., MARCUS, STEPHEN MICHAEL, ROSINSKI, RICHARD R.
Applicants: AT & T CORP, AT&T CORP.
Application year: 1997
Main classification: H04M11
IPC codes: G10L15, H04M11