SLOW RELEASE FORMULATIONS OF PESTICIDES

Abstract: Slow-Release agrochemical formulations for the prevention of leaching and contamination of soil and ground water. The agrochemicals are organic compounds with non-ionic and non-polar molecular structures, which are adsorbed to clays whose surface properties have been transformed from hydrophilic to organophilic by previous adsorption of an organic cation, usually of quaternary ammonium structure, having at least one benzyl group attached to the ammonium nitrogen atom. The intermolecular interactions on the clay surface result in a reduction of the solubility in water of the agrochemical, preventing its leaching in the field.

Description: SLOW RELEASE FORMULATIONS OF PESTICIDES Field of Invention Slow-Release of agrochemical formulations designated for the prevention of leaching and contamination of soil and ground water. The agrochemicals to which this invention can be applied are organic compounds with non-ionic and non-polar molecular structures. These are adsorbed to clays whose surface properties have been transformed from hydrophilic to organophilic by previous adsorption of an organic cation, usually of quaternary ammonium structure having at least one benzyl group attached to the ammonium nitrogen atom. These groups are suitable adsorption sites of the organoclay for the agrochemical molecules, and the intermolecular interactions on the clay surface result in reduction of the solubility in water of the active compounds, preventing, therefore its leaching in the field. Background The increasing use of agrochemicals such as herbicides, fungicides, insecticides, etc., poses serious health and environmental problems which must be controlled in order to minimize the harmful effects of those products. One problem frequently encountered with herbicides, such as alachlor, metolachlor, norflurazon and sulfometuron is leaching and migration, which results in loss of herbicidal efficiency and can cause damage to other crops and contaminate water. Alachlor and metolachlor have already been detected in ground water (Yaron et, al., 1984, Garner et at., 1986).Thus, only a small fraction of pesticides applied has desired activity. This imposes repeated applications and increasing cost and ecological damage. It is therefore highly desirable to develop methods which would prevent leaching and migration of pesticides from the top layers of soils, while still maintaining the biological activity in those layers. We have experimental evidence that pesticides adsorbed on organoclays (OC) meet those requirements and help in preventing the contamination of underground and surface water by pesticides. Ground water contamination by alachlor has been reported in several states of the USA and Canada (Chesters G. et al, 1989; Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, 1988). In most cases alachlor contamination of ground water has been attributed to point source contamination that resulted from improper handling, spills, and leaks (Hung and Frink 1989). However agriculture has been implicated as the non-point source of ground water contamination (Goodrich et al 1991 ).The downward transport of alachlor to the ground water is controlled primarily by retention and transportation processes. Occurrence of surface and ground water contamination by pesticides including alachlor and metolachlor have been revealed by monitoring programs (Chesters G. et al 1989). Alachlor residues in raw water intakes and tap water is evident (USEPA 1986). Recent monitoring programs show increasing numbers of pesticides in ground water. Cohen et al 1986 reported 17 pesticides in ground water in 23 States of the USA as a result of agricultural practices. Ground water contamination resulting from the use of alachlor and metolachor and other herbicides is affected by soil texture, organic matter content, depth to the ground water, temperature, relative humidity, precipitation and irrigation and the amount of herbicide applied. Recent studies in the distribution and dissipation of metolachlor in soil columns (Zheng et al 1993) have shown that the rate of herbicide migration increased with larger doses. Results of this study show that 84-91 % of the applied metolachlor was found in the superficial layer (0-9 cm) three days after application, 28 and 56 days after treatment, metolachlor was observed at 21 -27 and 27-33 cm depth, respectively. This depth of migration seems more important than described by Bowman (1988, 1989) who reported that metolachlor moved down no more than 10 cm. As indicated above, the use of available herbicide formulations poses a serious problem of soil and ground water contamination. Such available formulations include soluble concentrate (SC) and emulsion concentrate (EC). Sometimes SC are prepared from chemically modified herbicides whose molecular structure is changed by introducing polar or ionic substituent that increase the solubility in water. This results in an increased leaching in soils. An EC formulation of alachlor has been prepared by the mixing from about 20.0 to about 35.0 percent by weight of alachlor, from about to 1.25 to about 1.75 percent by weight of organophylic clay, from about 4.5 to about 9.0 percent by weight of an emulsifier selected from the group consisting of alkyl aryl sulfonates, phosphate esters of nonyl phenol ethoxylates and polyalkyleneglycol ether; from about 10.0 to about 20.0 percentage by weight of an organic solvent in which the herbicide is soluble, which is non reactive to the said herbicide and which is essentially water-soluble, balancing being made up of water (Prill, Erhard J Kirkwood; Patent Number US+ 4440562). Another attempt involved a herbicide in fluid suspension consisting of alachlor and chloralkylamino triazine based stabilized product (Arion D; Dorin E; Dragusin E; Katona N; Macarie G; Marinica G; Roibu C; Sarpe N; and Staicu S Patent Number RO 137906(890126)). In this attempt the herbicide comprises al: I to 2:1 synergetic ratio alachlor chloralkylamino-s-triazine active substance mix with 20-40% of toluene or xylene as stabilizer and 8-12% mixture of calcium alkyl aryl sulphonate and e.g., polyethoxylated castor oil, 0.5-1.5% of montmorillonitic clay, 1.0-2.5% of ethylene glycol, 0.2-2% of magnesium oxide, biacidic potassium phosphate and borax, remainder water up to 100%. The above mentioned patent was an attempt to improve the herbicidal activity of the herbicide, but ignored the importance of preventing leaching and protecting the groundwater from the contamination by herbicides. Our results using organoclay formulations have shown a considerable improvement as far as leaching is concerned. It was found that emulsion formulation is mobile throughout the soil profile, whereas with our organoclay formulations the herbicidal activity is retained in the top soil (0- 10cm). Modification of pesticide behavior by encapsulating the chemicals in a starch matrix is one experimental approach receiving, increased attention (Wing et al 1987). Starch encapsulation has been shown to reduce volatilization (Schreiber et al 1987) and leaching (Gish et al 1991) losses of some herbicides. In this attempt it was found that water potential, imposed using polyethylene glycol, significantly influenced the swelling of the starch matrix and rate of release of both alachlor and atrazine. At 0 MPa water potential complete release requires 21 days for atrazine and 7 days for alachlor. As water potential declined, so did the rate of release (Wienhood and Gish 1992). Results of this work showed that water potential exerts a significant effect on the rate of herbicidal release. It is clear that the ground water is not protected by the use of these encapsulations because the herbicide will be released from the microcapsules and it will leach for certain amounts of water applied. In our organoclay formulations, the prevention of leaching in the soil was observed even for a large amount of water applied (up to 1000 m3/ha). Therefore, this encapsulation approach in a pesticide formulation is not effective in preventing leaching and protecting ground water and soil from herbicide contamination. Recently, the use of an organo ammonium substituted smectite clay was suggested for controlled release. (Knudson, Jr, Milburn I Gonzales, Patent Number US + 4849006). In this attempt controlled release composition is prepared by contacting an organoclay with a biologically active material in concentrated form to cause absorption of the active material in the organoclay. That patent deals with slow release of volatile herbicides to the open atmosphere and does not mention the problem of leaching in soil. In that patent the organoclay is a C12-C18 dialkyl dimethyl ammonium organoclay, or a benzyl ammonium organoclay or a hydroxyalkoxy ammonium organoclay. Other organoclays suggested include montmorillonite modified by ammonium cation containing the following four groups: a) C4-C24 alkyl, b) hydrogen, c) benzyl or C4-C24 alkyl, d) hydrogen or C1 -C4 alkyl. The above mentioned formulation refers to the controlled release of a volatile compound when experiments carried out by us, see hereinafter, do not give satisfactory results. The present invention relates to slow release agrochemical formulations which substantially reduce leaching of the active ingredient into ground water, which comprise as carrier a clay the surface properties of which have been modified from hydrophilic to organophilic by absorption of a quaternary ammonium moiety, having preferably at least one benzyl group attached to the ammonium nitrogen atom to which there is attached the active agrochemical. A preferred clay is montmorlilonite, and suitable modifying agents are compounds such as hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium having a C-16 alkyl chain. The invention is exemplified with reference to certain specific herbicides, but the invention is described in the following, by way of illustration, with reference to some very well known and widely used herbicides. It ought to be understood that this description is by way of illustration only and that the invention is applicable to a wide variety of agrochemical compounds which have similar physical properties, allowing the surface treatment of the carrier and subsequent bonding of the agrochemical. We have prepared a formulation of alachlor in an organoclay fulfilling the above requirements. The organoclay was montmorillonite modified by the adsorption of the organic cation Hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium (HDTMA) that has one C16 alkyl chain of three C1 methyl groups. The results of the laboratory and field experiments showed that such an organoclay did not inhibit the movement of the herbicide in the soil profile. It can be concluded that the C16 alkyl group does not contribute to the adsorption of the herbicides having an aromatic ring structure, but has rather a steric hindrance effect. For those cases, the presence of a benzyl group and only C1 -C4 substituents in the ammonium cation are necessary. It was found that the best results are obtained when the clay modifying agents are benzyltrimethy ammonium chloride (BTMA), benzyltriethyl ammonium bromide (BTEA) or benzyl tributyl ammonium chloride (BTBA). In these cases significant inhibition of herbicide leaching has been achieved. Experimental a. Preparation of the formulations The main idea behind the suggested method of stabilizing teachable non polar pesticides is to adsorb them to clays whose surface charge has been partially or totally neutralized by suitable organic ammonium cations. A suitable concentration solution of the organic cation is added dropwise to a 0.5 or 1% W/W of clay suspension (e.g. Montmorillonite; Sepiolite; Palygorskite; Pillared clays). After separation of the supernatant, the organoclay complex is dried and ground to less than 50 urn. The herbicide is dissolved in a suitable volatile organic solvent e.g. hexane, dichloro methane, acetone, and mixed with the solid organoclay in weight relations of 5-20 g of herbicide to 95-80 g organoclay. The organic solvent is evaporated under gentle reduced pressure and continuos mixing and the resulting herbicide-organoclay complex is ground to less than 50 urn. b. Leaching studies and bioassays 1. Under laboratory and field conditions, the following bioassay column technique was used to evaluate the leaching of the herbicide using sensitive seeds to the given herbicide. Briefly, the experiments have used 100X100X200 mm tin columns filled with soil. The column surface is sprayed with either the commercial formulation of the herbicide or with the organoclay formulated herbicide. The herbicide is added at the same amounts as in the field applications, i.e., 200 g of the active ingredient per 1000 m2. Then the columns are irrigated with 50 m3 /1000 m2. The water is added throughout 5 hours. The columns are left for 24 h and then sliced along their lengths into two parts (right and left). Two plants, setaria and sorghum are sown in each part in two rows and irrigated with water. The height and the weight of the plants after 7 days, are used as an indicator of the presence of herbicide at different depths in the soil column. 2. Under field conditions the soil samples are sprayed with the organoclay- formulated herbicide along with the commercial one for comparison purposes, using the same field rate. The treated soils are irrigated at the same field rate of water (50 cubic meter / 1000 m2). Soil samples are taken from different soil depths for the bioassay techniques as described above. Inhibition of the growth is taken as an indicator of the presence of the herbicide on the soil depth. Results presented in Table 1 show that for the commercial formulation of alachlor, the herbicidal activity disappears from the top soil, being leached to 13 cm depth under the laboratory conditions, and to 12 cm under field conditions. On the other side, in the organoclay formulation, the herbicidal activity of alachlor is fully maintained in the top 10 cm under laboratory conditions and down to 8 cm under field conditions. Similar results are observed using the BTEA organic cation in the organoclay formulation (Table 2). Table 3 shows that the herbicidal activity of metolachlor is retained using a BTEA-montmorillonite formulation in the top 8-12 cm depth, whereas the commercial formulation leached down to more than 20 cm depth. The use of treated organoclays in the alachlor and metolachlor formulations, inhibits considerably the leaching of the herbicides both under laboratory and under field conditions. In a similar manner the above principles can be applied to other herbicides such as butachlor, norflurazon, sulfometuron, oxyfluorfen; to insecticides such as Azinphos, 2-sec-buthylphenyl methyl carbamate, carbaryl, carbofuran, chlordimeform, chlorfenvinphos, crotoxyphos, ethiofencarb, fenamiphos, fensulfothion, formetanate, metolcarb, propoxur, tralomethrin, trichloronate; and to fungicides such as benalaxyl, benodanil, kitazin P, carboxin, ethirimol, fenitropan, fenpropimorph, furalaxyl, metalaxyl, oxycarboxin, pyracarbolid, tolyfluanid, triadimefon. References Arion D., Dorin E., Dragusin E., Katona N., Macari G., Marinica G., Roibu C, Sarpe N., and Staicu S. (Patent No. RO 137906(890126)). Herbicide in form of fluid suspension consists of alachlor and chloralkylamino triazine based stabilized product. Bowman B. T . (I988). Environ. Qual. 17:689-694. Bowman B.T.J. (I 989). Environ. Toxicol. and Chem. 8:485-49 1. Chesters, G., Simsiman G.V., Levy J., Alhajjar B.J., Fathulla R.N., and Harkin J.M. (1989). Environmental fate of alachlor and metolachlor. Rev. Environ. Contm. Toxicol. 110: 1 -74. Cohen SZ, Eiden C, Lorben MN (I 986). Monitoring ground water for pesticides. Am.Chem. Soc.Washington, DC. pp 170-196. Garner W.Y., Honeycut R.C., Nigg H., (1986) ACS Symposium Ser. 315, Washington DC C) Goodrich J.A., Lykine B.W. and Clark R.M. (1991 ). Drinking water from agriculturally contaminated groundwater. J. Environ. Qual. 20:707-717. Gish T.J., Schoppet M.J., Helling C.S., Shirmohammadi A., Schreiber and Wing R. E.(1991 ). Transport comparison of technical grade and starch encapsulated atrazine. Trans. ASAE 34. 1738-1744. Hung L.Q. and Frink CR. (1989). Distribution of atrazin, simazine, alachlor and metolachlor in soil profiles in Connecticut. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 43:159-164. Prill, Erhard J Kirkwood MO. (Patent No. US + 4440562).Herbicidal Emulsions, Isopropylamine salt of N phosphonomethylglycine, Alachlor clay surfactants. Schreiber M.M., Shasha B.S. Ross M.A., Orwick P.L., and Edgecomb Jr. D. W.(1978). Efficacy and rate of release of EPTC and butylate from starch encapsulated formulation under greenhouse condition. Weed Sci.26:679-686. USEPA (1986) Alachlor. Special review technical support document. Position 2/3. Office of pesticides and toxic substance. US Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC. Wienhold J.B. and Gish T.J. (1992). Effect of water potential, temperature and soil microbial activity on release of starch encapsulated atrazine and alachlor. J. Environ. Qual. 21 :382-386. Wing R.E., Malti S. and Doane W.M. (1987). Effectiveness of jet-cooked pearl cornstarch as a controlled release matrix. Starch/Staerk 39:422-425. Yaron B., Gerstel Z., and Spencer W.F., (1984). Adv.Soil Sc, 2-1-143. Zheng S.Q., Cooper J.T., Fontanel P.V., Cost CM., and Meat M. (1993). Distribution and dissipation of metolachlor in soil column. J. Environ. Sci. 6:641 -653.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A slow release agrochemical composition with decreased leaching of the active ingredient from the composition, comprising a clay mineral carrier with a surface rendered organophilic by adsorption of a quaternary ammonium compound having at least one benzyl substituent through which the active compound is bonded. 2. A composition according to claim 1 , where the agrochemical is a non-polar pesticide. 3. A composition according to claim 1 or 2, where the modifying agent is hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium having a C-16 chain, benzyltrimethyl ammonium chloride, bromide or benzyltriethyl ammonium chloride or bromide. 4. A composition according to any of claims 1 to 3, where the clay is a montmorlilonite. 5. A composition according to any of claims 1 to 4, where the clay is of the tens of microns particle size. 6. A composition according to any of claims 1 to 5, where the pesticide is a herbicide. 7. A composition according to claim 6 where the herbicide is alachlor or metolachlor. 8. A composition according to any of claims 1 to 7, where about 5 to 20 weight-% of the ammonium compound is attached to the clay. 9. A composition according any of claims 1 to 8, where from about 5 weight-% to about 30 weight-% of the active compound is attached to the modified carrier. lO.Agrochemical compositions with substantially reduced leachability by water, comprising a mineral carrier the surface of which has been rendered organophilic, to which there is attached the non-polar agrochemical, substantially as described and with reference to any of the Examples.

Inventors: EL-NAHHAL YASSER, MARGULIES LEON DI, NIR SHLOMO, RUBIN BARUCH, EL-NAHHAL, YASSER, MARGULIES, LEON +DI, NIR, SHLOMO, RUBIN, BARUCH
Applicants: EL NAHHAL YASSER, MARGULIES GULIA & HF, NIR SHLOMO, RUBIN BARUCH, YISSUM RES DEV CO, EL-NAHHAL, YASSER, MARGULIES, GULIA +HF, NIR, SHLOMO, RUBIN, BARUCH, YISSUM RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF THE HEBREW
Application year: 1997
Main classification: A01N25
IPC codes: A01N25