SUGARCANE BACILLIFORM VIRUS PROMOTER

Abstract: An isolated and purified DNA molecule comprising a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter and expression cassettes comprising said promoter are provided. Also provided is a method of using a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter to express proteins, RNA transcripts, or mixtures thereof, in transgenic plants.

Description: SUGARCANE BACILLIFORM VIRUS PROMOTER Background of the Invention One of the primary goals of plant genetic engineering is to obtain plants having improved characteristics or traits. These characteristics or traits include virus resistance, insect resistance, herbicide resistance, enhanced stability and improved nutritional value, to name a few. Recent advances in genetic engineering have enabled the incorporation of preselected genes into plant cells to impart the desired qualities to the plant of choice. The introduced gene, i.e., "transgene," is then expressed in the cells of the regenerated plant, so that the plant will exhibit the trait or characteristic encoded by the transgene. To express a transgene in a plant cell, the proper regulatory signals must be present and in the proper location with respect to the transgene. These regulatory signals generally include a promoter region, a 5' non-translated leader sequence and a 3' polyadenylation sequence. The promoter region influences the rate at which the RNA product of the transgene, and resultant protein product of the transgene, is made. Promoter activity also can depend on the presence of several other cis-acting regulatory elements which, in conjunction with cellular factors, determine strength, specificity, and transcription initiation site (for a review, see Zawel and Reinberg, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.. 4, 488 (1992)). Strong promoters are able to direct RNA synthesis at a higher rate relative to weak promoters. Constituitive promoters direct RNA production in many or all cell types. The cauliflower mosaic virus 35 S promoter (CaMV35S) is a strong, constitutive promoter in plants (Odell et al., Nature. 313. 810 (1985); Jensen et al, Nature. 321. 669 (1986); Jefferson et al., KMRO J.. 6, 3901 (1987); Kay et al., Science. 236. 1299 (1987); Sanders et al., Nucl. Acids Res.. 4, 1543 (1987)). This had been shown by detecting substantial levels of reporter gene proteins or mRNAs in extracts prepared from the leaves, stems, roots and flowers of transgenic plants. As a result, the CaMV35S promoter is widely used in the field of plant genetic engineering. Although the CaMV35S promoter appears to be a strong, constitutive promoter in assays involving cell extracts, detailed histological analysis of reporter gene products detectable at the cell and tissue level shows a rather high degree of variability of expression of the gene products in tissues of plants. CaMN is a caulimovirus, a subgroup of pararetroviruses that has icosahedral capsids and infects only dicots, although the CaMN35 S promoter is a strong promoter in monocots. Sugarcane bacilliform virus (ScBV), Commelina yellow mottle virus (CoYMV) and rice tungro bacilliform virus (RTBV) are badnaviruses, a subgroup of pararetroviruses that have bacilliform capsids and infect mainly monocots. A promoter fragment isolated from CoYMV confers a tissue-specific pattern of expression that is different than the pattern conferred by the CaMV35S promoter. Transformed tobacco plants containing the CoYMV promoter linked to the beta-glucuronidase reporter gene ("GUS"; uidA) showed that while the CoMYV promoter is active in all organs, beta-glucuronidase activity occurs primarily in the phloem, the phloem- associated cells, and the axial parenchyma of roots, stems, leaves, and flowers (Medberry et al., Plant Cell. 4, 185 (1992); Medberry and Olszewski, Plant J.. 3, 619 (1993)). In contrast, the CaMV35S promoter is active in most cell types (Medberry et al., Plant Cell. 4, 185 (1992); Medberry and Olszewski, Plant J.. 3, 619 (1993)). Moreover, the CoYMV promoter is 30% as active in tobacco suspension cells and up to 25% as active in maize suspension cells compared to a duplicated CaMV35S promoter (Medberry et al., Plant Cell. 4, 185 (1992)). Transgenic rice containing the RTBV promoter linked to the GUS gene showed strong phloem-specific promoter activity. This was consistent with the expression of this promoter in rice protoplasts. However, the RTBV promoter showed only weak activity in maize protoplasts (Bhattacharyya-Pakrasi et al., Plant J.. 4, 71 (1993); Yin et al., Plant J- 7, 969 (1995)). In contrast, the corresponding CaMV promoter shows strong promoter activity in protoplasts and in almost all tissues of transgenic plants (reviewed by Hohn and Fiitterer, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.. 2, 90 (1992)). Thus, what is needed is a highly expressed, constitutive promoter to express transgenes in fertile transgenic monocot and dicot plants. Summary of the Invention The present invention provides an isolated and purified DNA molecule comprising a preselected DNA segment comprising a sugarcane bacilliform virus (ScBV) promoter, or a biologically active subunit thereof, that confers constitutively high levels of expression of operably linked preselected DNA segments in both monocot and dicot plants, plant tissue, plant parts or plant cells. While the nucleotide sequence of the genome of ScBV is known (Bouhida et al., J. Gen. Virol.. 74. 1 (1993)), the location of a promoter for genomic length viral RNA was not apparent, even after nucleotide sequence comparisons of the ScBV genome with promoter sequences of closely related viruses, such as CoYMV and RTBV. Surprisingly, the ScBV promoter is a strong and constituitive promoter in many cell types, unlike the strong tissue specific expression observed for CoMYV and RTBV promoters. A preferred embodiment of the invention is a preselected DNA segment comprising a ScBV promoter comprising SEQ ID NO:3, i.e., a preselected DNA segment that corresponds to nucleotide positions 5999-7420 of the ScBV genome. As described herein below, the ScBV promoter confers constitutive and vascular gene expression in A. sativa and A. thaliana. Thus, the ScBV promoter can be employed for constitutive or tissue- specific plant and non-plant gene expression in monocots and dicots. For example, the ScBV promoter may be linked to genes which confer to crops resistance against pests which attack crop grasses at the stem, e.g., aphids which vector barley yellow dwarf virus, or to confer tissue-specific resistance to dicotyledonous hosts, in which organs such as the roots are targeted by pathogens, e.g., soybean cyst nematode. As used herein, "ScBV" includes any non-enveloped, bacilliform, DNA- containing badnavirus capable of systemically infecting Saccharum or related genera. Other distinguishing features of badnaviruses are described by Lockhart and Olszewski, in The Encyclopedia of Virology. Webster and Granoff (eds.), Academic Press, New York, NY (1994)). As used herein, the term "ScBV promoter" means a nucleotide sequence which, when that sequence is operably linked to a preselected DNA segment that encodes a protein, RNA transcript, or mixture thereof, results in the expression of the linked preselected DNA segment, i.e., the encoded RNA and/or protein. A preferred ScBV promoter has at least about 60%), preferably at least about 80%, more preferably at least about 90%, and even more preferably at least about 95%), nucleotide sequence identity to SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4 or SEQ ID NO:5. Another preferred embodiment of the invention is a ScBV promoter which comprises the minimum number of contiguous nucleotides which initiate RNA transcription. As used herein, "biologically active" means that the promoter has at least about 0.1%), preferably at least about 10%>, and more preferably at least about 25%, the activity of the ScBV promoter comprising SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4 or SEQ ID NO:5. The activity of a promoter can be determined by methods well known to the art. For example, see Medberry et al., Plant Cell. 4, 185 (1992); Medberry et al., The Plant J.. 3, 619 (1993); Sambrook et al, In: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (1989); McPherson et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,164,316 . Further provided is an expression cassette comprising a first preselected DNA segment comprising a ScBV promoter functional in a host cell, operably linked to a second preselected DNA segment encoding a protein, RNA transcript, or a combination thereof. A preferred host cell is a plant cell, e.g., a monocot or dicot cell. Another preferred embodiment of the invention is an expression cassette comprising a ScBV promoter operably linked to a selectable marker gene. Yet another preferred embodiment of the invention is an expression cassette comprising a ScBV promoter which comprises SEQ ID NO:3. The invention also provides methods of selecting stable genetic transformants from transformed plant cells and methods of producing fertile transgenic plants from said transformed plant cells. The method for producing transformed plant cells comprises introducing into regenerable plant cells a recombinant DNA segment which comprises a first preselected DNA segment comprising a ScBV promoter operably linked to a second preselected DNA segment so as to yield transformed cells. Then a transformed cell line is identified or selected. Exemplary transformation methods include the use of microprojectile bombardment to introduce a preselected DNA segment, encoding a phenotypically observable or detectable trait, operably linked to the ScBV promoter, into regenerable monocot plant cells. A preferred embodiment of the invention is a method whereby the expression of the recombinant DNA segment in the transformed cells imparts a phenotypic characteristic to the transformed cells, such as herbicide or antibiotic resistance. As used herein, the term "recombinant DNA segment" refers to a nucleic acid, i.e., to DNA, that has been derived or isolated from any appropriate tissue source and isolated from association with other components of the cell, such as nucleic acid or protein. The DNA may be subsequently chemically altered in vitro, so that its sequence is not naturally occurring, or corresponds to naturally occurring sequences that are not positioned as they would be positioned in a genome which has not been transformed with exogenous DNA, so that it can be sequenced, replicated, and/or expressed. A preferred isolated recombinant DNA segment includes a first preselected DNA segment comprising a ScBV promoter functional in a plant cell operably linked to second preselected DNA segment comprising a selectable marker gene. Another preferred isolated recombinant DNA segment includes a second preselected DNA segment that corresponds to a gene that is already present in the plant genome, or one which is not normally present in the plant genome, which confers an agronomically useful phenotype to the plant, e.g., pest resistance. If the preselected DNA segment is normally present in the plant genome it may not be expressed or not highly expressed. Thus, the preselected DNA segment is introduced so as to alter the expression of the protein or RNA transcript encoded by the preselected DNA segment in the cells of the plant. The invention also provides a method for producing a fertile transgenic plant. The method comprises introducing a recombinant DNA segment which comprises a first preselected DNA segment comprising a ScBV promoter operably linked to a second preselected DNA segment into regenerable plant cells so as to yield regenerable transformed cells. A population of transformed cells is selected or identified and a fertile transgenic plant is regenerated therefrom. The recombinant DNA segment is transmitted through a complete sexual cycle of said transgenic plant to its progeny so that it is expressed by the progeny plants. Thus, the invention also provides a transgenic plant, and seed, other plant parts, tissue, and progeny plants derived therefrom. The transgenic plants of the invention include, but are not limited to, a transgenic TO or R0 plant, i.e., the first plant regenerated from transformed plant cells, a transgenic Tl or RI plant, i.e., the first generation progeny plant, and progeny plants of further generations derived therefrom which comprise and express the recombinant DNA segment. Microprojectile bombardment can be used to introduce the recombinant DNA segment into regenerable monocot cells, while Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer can be used to introduce the recombinant DNA into regenerable dicot cells. Also provided is a transformed monocot or dicot plant, the cells of which comprise a recombinant DNA segment comprising a first preselected DNA segment comprising a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter operably linked to a second preselected DNA segment. The second preselected DNA segment is expressed in the transformed cells in an amount that is different than the amount in the cells of a plant in which cells only differ from the transformed cells in that the recombinant DNA segment is absent. Such cells can include untransformed cells of the same part of the transformed, or transgenic, plant, in some cases. The second preselected DNA segment is expressed so as to render the transformed plant or a part thereof identifiable over the corresponding untransformed plant or part thereof. The recombinant DNA segment is transmitted through a complete normal sexual cycle of the transformed plant to the next generation. Also provided is a method comprising obtaining progeny from a fertile transgenic plant obtained by the method described hereinabove. As used herein, the term "transgenic" or "transformed" with respect to a plant cell, plant part (including seed), plant tissue or plant means a plant cell, plant part, plant tissue or plant which comprises an isolated, purified preselected DNA segment which has been introduced into the genome of a plant cell, plant part, plant tissue or plant by a "genetic engineering" transformation method. That is, the genome of a transgenic plant cell, plant part, plant tissue or plant has been augmented by at least one preselected DNA segment. The term "wild type," "native," or "nontransgenic" refers to an untransformed plant cell, plant part, plant tissue or plant, i.e., one where the genome has not been altered by the presence of the preselected DNA segment. The transformation of the plants in accordance with the invention may be carried out in essentially any of the various methods available to those skilled in the art of plant molecular biology. These include, but are not limited to, microprojectile bombardment, microinjection, electroporation of protoplasts or cells comprising partial cell walls, silicon carbide fiber-mediated DNA transfer and Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer. Plants useful in the practice of the invention include, but are not limited to, oat, wheat, soybean, corn, tobacco, rice, barley, potato, tomato, lettuce, oilseed rape, cotton, flax, sugar beet, sorghum, sunflower, alfalfa, millet and rye. Brief Description of the Figures Figure 1 depicts the deduced amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO:l) of sugarcane bacilliform virus. Figure 2 depicts the nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID NO:2) of sugarcane bacilliform virus. Figure 3 depicts expression cassettes comprising an ScBV promoter useful for plant transformation. Figure 4 depicts a (A) map of constructs used to test ScBV promoter activity in A. sαtivα. Resulting pMON755i derivatives containing ScBV cassettes 1, 2, or 3 were designated pScBV-1, pScBV-2, or pScBV-3, respectively; and (B) map of the reporter gene region in the binary vector used to test the ScBV-3 cassette promoter activity in A. thαliαnα. The ScBV-3 cassette was cloned into the Sail and Xbal sites of pOCAlOl. The cloning steps resulted in removal of the Spel/StuI sites and the Sall/Xhol sites. Figure 5 A. sativa and A. thaliana tissues stained for GUS activity: (A) A. sativa anthers; (B) A. sativa ovaries; (C) A. thaliana floral organs; (D) A. sativa spiklet; (E) A. sativa stem; (F) A. sativa leaf; (G) A. thaliana leaf. Detailed Description of the Invention The introduction of exogenous genes (transgenes) into plants to provide a fertile transgenic plant with improved agronomic properties has the potential for long term improvement in, and expansion of, agriculture world-wide. The present invention provides constituitive and strong expression of transgenes, e.g., encoding substances that yield altered agronomic or physiologic traits, in plants. Such transgenic plants, and seeds derived therefrom, can sexually transmit this trait to their progeny. Exemplary traits for transgenic plants include increased stress tolerance, pest resistance, disease resistance (e.g., bacteria, viruses and fungi), improved yields, improved nutritional value, and improved grain composition or quality. To provide constituitive and strong expression of transgenes in plants, plant cells, plant tissues, or plant parts, a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter, e.g., comprising SEQ ID NO:3, is operably linked to a defined transgene. i.e., a preselected DNA segment, and introduced into regenerable plant cells. The resulting regenerated transgenic plant expresses the protein, or RNA transcript, encoded by the preselected DNA segment at a high and uniform level, preferably throughout the tissues and cells of the transformed plant. A preferred ScBV promoter sequence is located between nucleotides 5999 and 7420 (SEQ ID NO:3) of the ScBV genome(SEQ ID NO:2). A 5 ' non-translated leader sequence is preferably coupled with the promoter. The leader sequence can be from the ScBV genome itself or can be from a source other than ScBV, e.g., the maize alcohol dehydrogenase first intron, and the 5 ' non-translated leader sequences from petunia HSP 70 (Winter et al., Mol. Gen. Genet.. 211. 315 (1988); soybean HSP17.9 (Raschke et al., J. Mol. Biol.. 199. 549 (1988); or maize HSP70 (Rochester et al., EMBO J.. 5, 541 (1986)). I. Recipient Cells The present invention employs recipient plant cells that are susceptible to transformation and subsequent regeneration into stably transformed, fertile plants. For monocot transformation for example, immature embryos, meristematic tissue, gametic tissue, embryogenic suspension cultures or embryogenic callus tissue can be employed as a source of recipient cells which is useful in the practice of the invention. Preferred recipient cells for the transformation of oat are oat callus cultures initiated from immature embryos. To provide such a culture of recipient oat cells, immature embryos of oat are dehulled and sterilized. The embryos are incubated in liquid media overnight and then the embryos are excised and placed on solid media, scutellum side down to initiate a callus culture. A preferred solid media for initiating a callus culture is MS2D (see Torbert et al., Plant Cell Reports. 14, 635 (1995)). For dicot transformation, organ and tissue cultures can be employed as a source of recipient cells. Thus, tissues, e.g., leaves, seed and roots, of dicots can provide a source of recipient cells useful in the practice of the invention. Cultured susceptible recipient cells are preferably grown on solid supports. Nutrients are provided to the cultures in the form of media and the environmental conditions for the cultures are controlled. Media and environmental conditions which support the growth of regenerable plant cultures are well known to the art. II. DNA Sequences Virtually any DNA composition may be used for delivery to recipient plant cells to ultimately produce fertile transgenic plants in accordance with the present invention. The DNA segment or gene chosen for cellular introduction will often encode a protein and can be expressed in the resultant transformed cells, to result in a screenable or selectable trait and/or to impart an improved phenotype to the regenerated plant. The DNA segment or gene chosen for cellular introduction may also encode anti-sense RNA, i.e., a complement of a predetermined RNA molecule, or a portion thereof, that is expressed in an untransformed plant cell. The transcription of an anti-sense RNA suppresses the expression of the complementary RNA, e.g., one which encodes an undesirable property. Thus, a preselected DNA segment, in the form of vectors and plasmids, or linear DNA fragments, in some instances containing only the DNA element to be expressed in the plant, and the like, may be employed. However, this may not always be the case, and the present invention also encompasses transgenic plants incorporating non-expressed transgenes. Exemplary DNA sequences are provided in Tables 1, 2 and 3 in Weising et al. (Ann. Rev. Genet.. 22, 421 (1988)), and in Lundquist et al. (U.S. Patent No. 5,484,956), both of which are incorporated by reference herein. In certain embodiments, it is contemplated that one may wish to employ replication-competent viral vectors in plant transformation, such as those which can be employed for corn transformation, to transfer the preselected DNA segment into plants. Such vectors include, for example, wheat dwarf virus (WDV) "shuttle" vectors, such as pWl-11 and PW1-GUS (Ugaki et al., Nucl. Acid Res.. 19. 391 (1991)). These vectors are capable of autonomous replication in corn cells as well as E. coli, and as such may provide increased sensitivity for detecting DNA delivered to transgenic non-corn plant cells. A replicating vector may also be useful for delivery of genes flanked by DNA sequences from transposable elements such as Ac, Ds, or Mu, as these elements would actively promote integration of the desired DNA and hence increase the frequency of stable transformation. It is also contemplated that transposable elements would be useful to introduce DNA fragments lacking elements necessary for selection and maintenance of the plasmid vector in bacteria, e.g., antibiotic resistance genes and origins of DNA replication. DNA useful for introduction into plant cells includes that which has been derived or isolated from any source, that may be subsequently characterized as to structure, size and/or function, chemically altered, and later introduced into plants. An example of such DNA "isolated" from a source would be a useful DNA sequence that is excised or removed from said source by chemical means, e.g., by the use of restriction endonucleases, so that it can be further manipulated, e.g., separated or amplified, e.g., via polymerase chain reaction (PCR), for use in the invention, by the methodology of genetic engineering. Recovery or isolation of a given fragment of DNA from a restriction digest can employ separation of the digest on polyacrylamide or agarose gel by electrophoresis, identification of the fragment of interest by comparison of its mobility versus that of marker DNA fragments of known molecular weight, removal of the gel section containing the desired fragment, and separation of the gel from DNA. See Lawn et al., Nucleic Acids Res.. 9, 6103 (1981), and Goeddel et al., Nucleic Acids Res.. 8, 4057 (1980). Thus, DNA is "isolated" in that it is free from at least one contaminating nucleic acid with which it is normally associated in the natural source of the RNA or DNA and is preferably substantially free of any other mammalian RNA or DNA. The phrase "free from at least one contaminating source nucleic acid with which it is normally associated" includes the case where the nucleic acid is reintroduced into the source or natural cell but is in a different chromosomal location or is otherwise flanked by nucleic acid sequences not normally found in the source cell. An example of DNA "derived" from a source, would be a DNA sequence or segment that is identified as a useful fragment within a given organism, and which is then chemically synthesized in essentially pure form. Therefore, "recombinant or preselected DNA" includes completely synthetic DNA sequences, semi-synthetic DNA sequences, DNA sequences isolated from biological sources, and DNA sequences derived from RNA, as well as mixtures thereof. The introduced DNA includes, but is not limited to, DNA from plant genes, and non-plant genes such as those from bacteria, yeasts, animals or viruses. Moreover, it is within the scope of the invention to isolate a preselected DNA segment from a given plant genotype, and to subsequently introduce multiple copies of the preselected DNA segment into the same genotype, e.g., to enhance production of a given gene product. The introduced DNA can include modified genes, portions of genes, or chimeric genes, including genes from the same or different plant genotype. The term "chimeric gene" or "chimeric DNA" is defined as a gene or DNA sequence or segment comprising at least two DNA sequences or segments from species which do not combine DNA under natural conditions, or which DNA sequences or segments are positioned or linked in a manner which does not normally occur in the native genome of the untransformed plant. The introduced DNA used for transformation herein may be circular or linear, double-stranded or single-stranded. Generally, the DNA is in the form of chimeric DNA, such as plasmid DNA, that can also contain coding regions flanked by regulatory sequences which promote the expression of the recombinant DNA present in the resultant plant. Generally, the introduced DNA will be relatively small, i.e., less than about 30 kb to minimize any susceptibility to physical, chemical, or enzymatic degradation which is known to increase as the size of the DNA increases. As noted above, the number of proteins, RNA transcripts or mixtures thereof, encoded by the DNA molecules which are introduced into the plant genome is preferably preselected and defined, e.g., from one to about 5-10 such products of the introduced DNAs may be formed. A. Preparation of an Expression Cassette An expression cassette of the invention can comprise a recombinant DNA molecule containing a preselected DNA segment operably linked to a ScBV promoter functional in a host cell, preferably a plant cell. Preferably, the expression cassette itself is chimeric, i.e., the cassette comprises DNA from at least two different species, or comprises DNA from the same species, which is linked or associated in a manner which does not occur in the "native" or wild type of the species. 1. DNA Molecules of the Invention Which Comprise a ScBV Promoter A promoter is a region of DNA that regulates gene expression. Promoter regions are typically found in the flanking DNA sequence upstream from the coding sequence in viruses as well as prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. A promoter sequence provides for regulation of transcription of the downstream gene sequence and typically includes from about 50 to about 2,000 nucleotide base pairs. Promoter sequences can also contain regulatory sequences such as enhancer sequences that can influence the level of gene expression. Some isolated promoter sequences can provide for gene expression of heterologous DNAs, that is a DNA different from the native or homologous DNA. Promoter sequences are also known to be strong or weak or inducible. A strong promoter provides for a high level of gene expression, whereas a weak promoter provides for a very low level of gene expression. An inducible promoter is a promoter that provides for turning on and off of gene expression in response to an exogenously added agent or to an environmental or developmental stimulus. Promoters can also provide for tissue specific or developmental regulation. An isolated promoter sequence that is a strong promoter for heterologous DNAs is advantageous because it provides for a sufficient level of gene expression to allow for easy detection and selection of transformed cells and provides for a high level of gene expression when desired. The DNA molecule of the invention comprises a preselected DNA segment comprising a sugarcane bacilliform virus (ScBV) promoter. ScBV is a pararetrovirus. In general, pararetroviruses have a promoter that directs transcription of an RNA transcript that serves as both a template for replication of the viral genome and as mRNA. During replication of the circular double stranded viral DNA, the 3' end of a host tRNA binds near the 5' end of the ScBV transcript so as to prime DNA synthesis by the virally encoded reverse transcriptase. Thus, in general, ScBV promoters are positioned 5' to the tRNA binding site and 3' to the 5' half of the third open reading frame (ORF III) in the viral genome. Promoters from ScBV isolates can be prepared by purifying virions and/or viral DNA by methodology described in Bouhida et al. (supra), and the promoter region cloned using methods well known to the art, e.g., screening a DNA expression library generated by ligating ScBV viral DNA fragment with a screenable marker gene. In the alternative, a ScBV promoter can be amplified from viral DNA using a degenerate primer, e.g., BADNAT (Lockhart and Olszewski, In: Proceedings of LNIBAP Conference on Breeding Banana and Plantains for Pest and Disease, pp. 105-113 (1994)) and a primer that hybridizes to a conserved region of the viral genome, e.g., the tRNA binding site or the DNA which encodes the viral replicase. A preferred embodiment of the invention is an isolated and purified DNA molecule comprising a preselected DNA segment comprising a ScBV promoter comprising SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4 or SEQ ID NO:5, or a nucleotide sequence variant thereof (see below). It is also preferred that the ScBV promoter containing DNA excludes sequences that inhibit or interfere with translation of the RNA transcript generated by the ScBV promoter, e.g., the RNA transcript has a high degree of secondary structure or encodes potential start (ATG) codons. A preselected DNA segment can be combined with the ScBV promoter by standard methods as described in Sambrook et al., In: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor (1989)). Briefly, the preselected DNA segment can be subcloned downstream from the promoter using restriction enzymes to ensure that the DNA is inserted in proper orientation with respect to the promoter so that the DNA can be expressed. Once the preselected DNA segment is operably linked to the promoter, the expression cassette so formed can be subcloned into a plasmid or other vectors. 2. Variants of the DNA Molecules of the Invention Nucleic acid molecules encoding nucleotide sequence variants of the ScBV promoter comprising SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4 or SEQ ID NO:5, and the like, can be prepared by a variety of methods known in the art. These methods include, but are not limited to, isolation from a natural source (in the case of naturally occurring nucleotide sequence variants, e.g., from other isolates of ScBV, isolated from infected plant material) or preparation by oligonucleotide-mediated (or site-directed) mutagenesis, PCR mutagenesis, and cassette mutagenesis of an earlier prepared variant or a non-variant version of the ScBV promoter. Oligonucleotide-mediated mutagenesis is a preferred method for preparing nucleotide substitution variants of the ScBV promoter. This technique is well known in the art as described by Adelman et al., DNA. 2, 183 (1983). Briefly, ScBV promoter DNA is altered by hybridizing an oligonucleotide encoding the desired mutation to a DNA template, where the template is the single-stranded form of a plasmid or bacteriophage containing the unaltered or native DNA sequence of the ScBV promoter. After hybridization, a DNA polymerase is used to synthesize an entire second complementary strand of the template that will thus incorporate the oligonucleotide primer, and will code for the selected alteration in the ScBV promoter. Generally, oligonucleotides of at least 25 nucleotides in length are used. An optimal oligonucleotide will have 12 to 15 nucleotides that are completely complementary to the template on either side of the nucleotide(s) coding for the mutation. This ensures that the oligonucleotide will hybridize properly to the single-stranded DNA template molecule. The oligonucleotides are readily synthesized using techniques known in the art such as that described by Crea et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.. 75, 5765 (1978). The DNA template can be generated by those vectors that are either derived from bacteriophage Ml 3 vectors (the commercially available M13mpl8 and M13mpl9 vectors are suitable), or those vectors that contain a single- stranded phage origin of replication as described by Viera et al., Meth. Enzvmol.. 153. 3 (1987). Thus, the DNA that is to be mutated may be inserted into one of these vectors to generate single-stranded template. Production of the single- stranded template is described in Sections 4.21-4.41 of Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, N.Y. 1989). Alternatively, single-stranded DNA template may be generated by denaturing double-stranded plasmid (or other) DNA using standard techniques. For alteration of the native DNA sequence, the oligonucleotide is hybridized to the single-stranded template under suitable hybridization conditions. A DNA polymerizing enzyme, usually the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I, is then added to synthesize the complementary strand of the template using the oligonucleotide as a primer for synthesis. A heteroduplex molecule is thus formed such that one strand of DNA encodes the mutated form of the ScBV promoter, and the other strand (the original template) encodes the native, unaltered sequence of the ScBV promoter. This heteroduplex molecule is then transformed into a suitable host cell, usually a prokaryote such as E. coli JM101. After the cells are grown, they are plated onto agarose plates and screened using the oligonucleotide primer radiolabeled with 32-phosphate to identify the bacterial colonies that contain the mutated DNA. The mutated region is then removed and placed in an appropriate vector for protein production, generally an expression vector of the type typically employed for transformation of an appropriate host. The method described immediately above may be modified such that a homoduplex molecule is created wherein both strands of the plasmid contain the mutations(s). The modifications are as follows: The single-stranded oligonucleotide is annealed to the single-stranded template as described above. A mixture of three deoxyribonucleotides, deoxyriboadenosine (dATP), deoxyriboguanosine (dGTP), and deoxyribothymidine (dTTP), is combined with a modified thiodeoxyribocytosine called dCTP-(aS) (which can be obtained from the Amersham Corporation). This mixture is added to the template- oligonucleotide complex. Upon addition of DNA polymerase to this mixture, a strand of DNA identical to the template except for the mutated bases is generated. In addition, this new strand of DNA will contain dCTP-(aS) instead of dCTP, which serves to protect it from restriction endonuclease digestion. After the template strand of the double-stranded heteroduplex is nicked with an appropriate restriction enzyme, the template strand can be digested with ExoIII nuclease or another appropriate nuclease past the region that contains the site(s) to be mutagenized. The reaction is then stopped to leave a molecule that is only partially single-stranded. A complete double-stranded DNA homoduplex is then formed using DNA polymerase in the presence of all four deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, ATP, and DNA ligase. This homoduplex molecule can then be transformed into a suitable host cell such as E. coli JM101. Embodiments of the invention include an isolated and purified DNA molecule comprising a preselected DNA segment comprising a ScBV promoter comprising SEQ ID NO:3, or nucleotide sequence variants of SEQ ID NO:3 which do not reduce the biological activity of the promoter. 3. Preferred Preselected DNA Segments A preferred embodiment of the invention provides a method for the introduction of a preselected DNA segment into fertile plants, which, when the preselected DNA segment is expressed from the ScBV promoter in the plant, confers a desirable agronomic property to the plant. Such DNA segments or "genes" are disclosed, for example in Lundquist et al. (U.S. Patent No. 5,484,956), Lundquist et al. (U.S. Patent No. 5,508,468), Dobres (international application PCT/US95/11231) and by K. Weising et al. (Ann. Rev. Genet.. 22, 421 (1988), see Tables 1, 2 and 3), all of which are incorporated by reference herein. However, the present invention is not limited in scope to preselected DNA segments which encode a desirable agronomic property, as many other preselected DNA segments which encode proteins or RNA transcripts that confer desirable characteristics to plants are within the scope of the invention. Preferred agronomic properties encoded by the preselected DNA segment include, but are not limited to, insect resistance or tolerance, herbicide resistance or tolerance, disease resistance or tolerance (e.g., resistance to viruses or fungal pathogens), stress tolerance (increased salt tolerance), improved food content or increased yields. For example, genetic studies have shown that for a plant to resist infection by a particular plant pathogen, the plant must have a resistance (R) gene which interacts directly or indirectly with a single avirulence (avr) gene which is present in the genome of the pathogen. Thus, the introduction a preselected DNA segment comprising a R gene into a plant which lacks the R gene can confer resistance to that plant to a pathogen which expresses the corresponding avr gene. Enhanced resistance to fungal infections may be obtained by introducing a preselected DNA segment which encodes a pathogenesis related (PR) protein into a plant. PR proteins are proteins which are synthesized by cereals in response to infection by some pathogenic fungi (Scott, Australasian Plant Path.. 23, 154 (1994)). Enhanced resistance to viral infections may be obtained by introducing a preselected DNA segment encoding a viral coat protein into a plant. For example, Nelson et al. (Bio/technol.. 6, 403 (1988)) disclose that the expression of the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) coat protein in a tomato plant confers tolerance to the plant to TMV and to tomato mosaic virus (ToMV), a virus related to TMV. Clark et al. (International application PCT/EP92/03001) disclose that expression of maize dwarf mosaic virus coat protein in corn resulted in plants which exhibited reduced disease symptoms when exposed to the virus. Vaeck et al. (Nature. 328. 33 (1987)) disclose that the expression of Bacillus thurigenesis (Bt) endotoxin genes in tobacco rendered those plants more tolerant to insect infestation. Lundquist et al. (U.S. Patent No. 5,484,956) disclose that expression of genes encoding Bt endotoxin can impart insect resistance to transgenic maize. Moreover, it is envisioned that more than one preselected DNA segment can be introduced into a plant. For example, a plasmid which contains a selectable marker gene (see below) and a gene which confers resistance to a particular virus, e.g., barley yellow dwarf virus, can be introduced into regenerable plant cells. 4. Optional Sequences in the Expression Cassette The expression cassette can also optionally contain other DNA sequences. a. Marker Genes In order to improve the ability to identify transformants, one may desire to employ a selectable or screenable marker gene as, or in addition to, the expressible preselected DNA segment. "Marker genes" are genes that impart a distinct phenotype to cells expressing the marker gene and thus allow such transformed cells to be distinguished from cells that do not have the marker. Such genes may encode either a selectable or screenable marker, depending on whether the marker confers a trait which one can 'select' for by chemical means, i.e., through the use of a selective agent (e.g., a herbicide, antibiotic, or the like), or whether it is simply a trait that one can identify through observation or testing, i.e., by 'screening' (e.g., β-glucuronidase). Of course, many examples of suitable marker genes are known to the art and can be employed in the practice of the invention. Included within the terms selectable or screenable marker genes are also genes which encode a "secretable marker" whose secretion can be detected as a means of identifying or selecting for transformed cells. Examples include markers which encode a secretable antigen that can be identified by antibody interaction, or even secretable enzymes which can be detected by their catalytic activity. Secretable proteins fall into a number of classes, including small, diffusible proteins detectable, e.g., by ELISA; small active enzymes detectable in extracellular solution (e.g., α-amylase, β-lactamase, phosphinothricin acetyltransf erase); and proteins that are inserted or trapped in the cell wall (e.g., proteins that include a leader sequence such as that found in the expression unit of extensin or tobacco PR-S). Elements of the present disclosure are exemplified in detail through the use of particular marker genes, however in light of this disclosure, numerous other possible selectable and/or screenable marker genes will be apparent to those of skill in the art in addition to the one set forth hereinbelow. Therefore, it will be understood that the following discussion is exemplary rather than exhaustive. In light of the techniques disclosed herein and the general recombinant techniques which are known in the art, the present invention renders possible the introduction of any gene, including marker genes, into a recipient cell to generate a transformed monocot. 1. Selectable Markers Possible selectable markers for use in connection with the present invention include, but are not limited to, a neo gene (Potrykus et al., Mol. Gen. Genet.. 199. 183 (1985)) which codes for kanamycin resistance and can be selected for using kanamycin, G418, and the like; the npt II gene which encodes paromomycin resistance; the hyg gene which encodes hygromycin B resistance; a bar gene which codes for bialaphos resistance; a gene which encodes an altered EPSP synthase protein (Hinchee et al., Biotech.. 6, 915 (1988)) thus conferring glyphosate resistance; a nitrilase gene such as bxn from Klebsiella ozaenae which confers resistance to bromoxynil (Stalker et al., Science. 242. 419 (1988)); a mutant acetolactate synthase gene (ALS) which confers resistance to imidazolinone, sulfonylurea or other ALS -inhibiting chemicals (European Patent Application 154,204, 1985); a methotrexate-resistant DHFR gene (Thillet et al, J. Biol. Chem.. 263. 12500 (1988)); a dalapon dehalogenase gene that confers resistance to the herbicide dalapon; or a mutated anthranilate synthase gene that confers resistance to 5-methyl tryptophan. Where a mutant EPSP synthase gene is employed, additional benefit may be realized through the incorporation of a suitable chloroplast transit peptide, CTP (European Patent Application 0,218,571, 1987). See also Table 1 of Lundquist et al. (U.S. Patent No. 5,484,956). An illustrative embodiment of a selectable marker gene capable of being used to select transformants is the gene that encodes the enzyme phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, such as the bar gene (see Somers et al., supra (1992)). The enzyme phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) inactivates the active ingredient in the herbicide bialaphos, phosphinothricin (PPT). PPT inhibits glutamine synthetase, (Murakami et al., Mol. Gen. Genet.. 205. 42 (1986); Twell et al., Plant Phvsiol.. 9_I, 1270 (1989)) causing rapid accumulation of ammonia and cell death. 2. Screenable Markers Screenable markers that may be employed include, but are not limited to, a β-glucuronidase or uidk gene (GUS) which encodes an enzyme for which various chromogenic substrates are known; an R-locus gene, which encodes a product that regulates the production of anthocyanin pigments (red color) in plant tissues (Dellaporta et al., in Chromosome Structure and Function, pp. 263- 282 (1988)); a β-lactamase gene (Sutcliffe, PNAS USA. 75, 3737 (1978)), which encodes an enzyme for which various chromogenic substrates are known (e.g., PADAC, a chromogenic cephalosporin); a xylE gene (Zukowsky et al., PNAS USA. 80. 1101 (1983)) which encodes a catechol dioxygenase that can convert chromogenic catechols; an α-amylase gene (Ikuta et al., Biotech.. 8, 241 (1990)); a tyrosinase gene (Katz et al., J. Gen. Microbiol.. 129. 2703 (1983)) which encodes an enzyme capable of oxidizing tyrosine to DOPA and dopaquinone which in turn condenses to form the easily detectable compound melanin; a β- galactosidase gene, which encodes an enzyme for which there are chromogenic substrates; a luciferase (lux) gene (Ow et al., Science. 234. 856 (1986)), which allows for bioluminescence detection; or even an aequorin gene (Prasher et al., Biochem. Biophvs. Res. Comm.. 126. 1259 (1985)), which may be employed in calcium-sensitive bioluminescence detection, or a green fluorescent protein gene (Niedz et al., Plant Cell Reports. 14, 403 (1995)). A further screenable marker contemplated for use in the present invention is firefly luciferase, encoded by the lux gene. The presence of the lux gene in transformed cells may be detected using, for example, X-ray film, scintillation counting, fluorescent spectrophotometry, low-light video cameras, photon counting cameras or multiwell luminometry. It is also envisioned that this system may be developed for populational screening for bioluminescence, such as on tissue culture plates, or even for whole plant screening. b. Other Sequences Transcription enhancers or duplications of enhancers can be used to increase expression from a particular promoter. Examples of such enhancers include, but are not limited to, elements from the CaMV 35S promoter and octopine synthase genes (Last et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,290,924, issued March 1, 1994). It is proposed that the use of an enhancer element, such as the ocs element, and particularly multiple copies of the element, will act to increase the level of transcription from adjacent promoters when applied in the context of plant transformation. As the DNA sequence inserted between the transcription initiation site and the start of the coding sequence, i.e., the untranslated leader sequence, can influence gene expression, one can also employ a particular leader sequence. Preferred leader sequence include those which comprise sequences selected to direct optimum expression of the attached gene, i.e., to include a preferred consensus leader sequence which can increase or maintain mRNA stability and prevent inappropriate initiation of translation (Joshi, Nucl. Acid Res.. 15. 6643 (1987)). Such sequences are known to those of skill in the art. However, some leader sequences, e.g., the leader sequence of RTBV, have a high degree of secondary structure which is expected to decrease mRNA stability and/or decrease translation of the mRNA. Thus, leader sequences which do not have a high degree of secondary structure or which have a high degree of secondary structure where the secondary structure does not inhibit mRNA stability and/or decrease translation, or leader sequences that are derived from genes that are highly expressed in plants, will be most preferred. Regulatory elements such as Adh intron 1 (Callis et al., Genes Develop.. 1, 1183 (1987)), sucrose synthase intron (Vasil et al., Plant Phvsiol.. 91, 5175 (1989)) or TMV omega element (Gallie et al., The Plant Cell. 1, 301 (1989)) can also be included where desired. Other such regulatory elements useful in the practice of the invention are known to those of skill in the art. Additionally, expression cassettes can be constructed and employed to target the gene product of the preselected DNA segment to an intracellular compartment within plant cells or to direct a protein to the extracellular environment. This can generally be achieved by joining a DNA sequence encoding a transit or signal peptide sequence to the coding sequence of the preselected DNA segment. The resultant transit, or signal, peptide will transport the protein to a particular intracellular, or extracellular destination, respectively, and can then be post-translationally removed. Transit or signal peptides act by facilitating the transport of proteins through intracellular membranes, e.g., vacuole, vesicle, plastid and mitochondrial membranes, whereas signal peptides direct proteins through the extracellular membrane. By facilitating transport of the protein into compartments inside or outside the cell, these sequences can increase the accumulation of gene product. The transit or signal peptide encoded by the preselected DNA segment can be directed to a particular organelle, such as the chloroplast rather than to the cytoplasm. Thus, the expression cassette can further comprise a chloroplast transit peptide encoding DNA sequence operably linked between a ScBV promoter and the preselected DNA segment (for a review of plastid targeting peptides, see Heijne et al., Eur. J. Biochem.. 180. 535 (1989); Keegstra et al., Ann. Rev. Plant Phvsiol. Plant Mol. Biol.. 40, 471 (1989)). This is exemplified by the use of the rbcS (RuBISCO) transit peptide which targets proteins specifically to plastids. For example, see Glassman et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,258,300. It may be useful to target DNA itself within a cell. For example, it may be useful to target an introduced preselected DNA to the nucleus as this may increase the frequency of transformation. Within the nucleus itself, it would be useful to target a gene in order to achieve site-specific integration. For example, it would be useful to have a gene introduced through transformation replace an existing gene in the cell. When the expression cassette is to be introduced into a plant cell, the expression cassette can also optionally include 3 ' nontranslated plant regulatory DNA sequences that act as a signal to terminate transcription and allow for the polyadenylation of the resultant mRNA. The 3' nontranslated regulatory DNA sequence preferably includes from about 300 to 1,000 nucleotide base pairs and contains plant transcriptional and translational termination sequences. Preferred 3 ' elements are derived from those from the nopaline synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Bevan et al., Nucl. Acid Res.. 11. 369 (1983)), the terminator for the T7 transcript from the octopine synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and the 3' end of the protease inhibitor I or II genes from potato or tomato, although other 3 ' elements known to those of skill in the art can also be employed. These 3' nontranslated regulatory sequences can be obtained as described in An, Methods in Enzvmologv. 153. 292 (1987) or are already present in plasmids available from commercial sources such as Clontech, Palo Alto, California. The 3 ' nontranslated regulatory sequences can be operably linked to the 3' terminus of the preselected DNA segment. An expression cassette can also be introduced into an expression vector, such as a plasmid. Plasmid vectors include additional DNA sequences that provide for easy selection, amplification, and transformation of the expression cassette in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, e.g., pUC-derived vectors, pSK- derived vectors, pGEM-derived vectors, pSP-derived vectors, or pBS-derived vectors. Thus, additional DNA sequences include origins of replication to provide for autonomous replication of the vector, selectable marker genes, preferably encoding antibiotic or herbicide resistance, unique multiple cloning sites providing for multiple sites to insert DNA sequences or genes encoded in the expression cassette, and sequences that enhance transformation of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Another vector that is useful for expression in both plant and prokaryotic cells is the binary Ti plasmid (as disclosed in Schilperoort et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,940,838, issued July 10, 1990) as exemplified by vector pGA582. This binary Ti plasmid vector has been previously characterized by An and is available from Dr. An (see Methods in Enzvmologv. 153. 292 (1987)). This binary Ti vector can be replicated in prokaryotic bacteria such as E. coli and Agrobacterium. The Agrobacterium plasmid vectors can be used to transfer the expression cassette to plant cells. The binary Ti vectors preferably include the nopaline T DNA right and left borders to provide for efficient plant cell transformation, a selectable marker gene, unique multiple cloning sites in the T border regions, the colEl replication of origin and a wide host range replicon. The binary Ti vectors carrying an expression cassette of the invention can be used to transform both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, but is preferably used to transform plant cells. III. DNA Delivery The expression cassette or vector is then introduced into a recipient cell to create a transformed cell. For the introduction of an expression cassette into plant cells, the frequency of occurrence of plant cells receiving DNA is be believed to be low. Moreover, it is most likely that not all recipient cells receiving DNA segments or sequences will result in a transformed cell wherein the DNA is stably integrated into the plant genome and/or expressed. Some may show only initial and transient gene expression. However, certain cells from virtually any plant may be stably transformed, and these cells regenerated into transgenic plants. A preselected DNA segment may be delivered into plant cells or tissues, or prokaryotic or eukaryotic non-plant cells, by currently available methods including, but not limited to, protoplast transformation, tungsten whiskers (Coffee et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,302,523, issued April 12, 1994), directly by microorganisms with infectious plasmids, infectious viruses, the use of liposomes, microinjection by mechanical or laser beam methods, by whole chromosomes or chromosome fragments, electroporation, silicon carbide fibers, and microprojectile bombardment. A preferred embodiment of the invention accomplishes the introduction of a preselected DNA segment into monocot cells by methods of transformation especially effective for monocots, which include, but is not limited to, microprojectile bombardment (see Lundquist et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,538,877). Introduction and expression of foreign genes in dicotyledonous (broad- leafed) plants such as tobacco, potato and alfalfa has been shown to be possible using the T-DNA of the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (See, for example, Umbeck, U.S. Patent No. 5,004,863, and international application PCT/US93/02480). Using recombinant DNA techniques and bacterial genetics, a wide variety of foreign DNAs can be inserted into T-DNA in Agrobacterium. Following infection by the bacterium containing the recombinant Ti plasmid, the foreign DNA is inserted into the host plant chromosomes, thus producing a genetically engineered cell and eventually a genetically engineered plant. A second approach is to introduce root-inducing (Ri) plasmids as the gene vectors. Dicots are susceptible to transformation by Agrobacterium. Recently, rice and corn, which are monocots, have been shown to be susceptible to transformation by Agrobacterium as well. However, many other important monocot crop plants including wheat, barley, oats, sorghum, millet, and rye have not yet been successfully transformed by Agrobacterium. The Ti plasmid, however, may be manipulated in the future to act as a vector for these other monocot plants. Additionally, using the Ti plasmid as a model system, it may be possible to artificially construct transformation vectors for these plants. Ti- plasmids might also be introduced into monocot plants by artificial methods such as microinjection, or fusion between monocot protoplasts and bacterial spheroplasts containing the T-region, which can then be integrated into the plant nuclear DNA. Other transformation methods for dicots include the leaf disc method of Horsch et al. (Science, 227, 1229 (1985)) and as adapted by Fry et al. (Plant Cell Reports. 6, 321 (1987)) for Brassica napus. IV. Production and Characterization of Stable Transgenic Plants After effecting delivery of a preselected DNA segment to recipient cells by any of the methods discussed above, the next steps of the invention generally involve identifying the transformed cells for further culturing and plant regeneration. As mentioned above, in order to improve the ability to identify transformants, one may employ a selectable or screenable marker gene as, or in addition to, the expressible preselected DNA segment. In this case, one would then generally assay the potentially transformed cell population by exposing the cells to a selective agent or agents, or one would screen the cells for the desired marker gene trait. A. Selection An exemplary embodiment of methods for identifying transformed cells involves exposing bombarded cultures to a selective agent, such as a metabolic inhibitor, an antibiotic, herbicide or the like as described hereinabove. Cells which have been transformed and have stably integrated a marker gene conferring resistance to the selective agent used, will grow and divide in culture. Sensitive cells will not be amenable to further culturing. It is further contemplated that combinations of screenable and selectable markers will be useful for identification of transformed cells. In some cell or tissue types, a selection agent, such as the antibiotic kanamycin or G418, may either not provide enough selective killing to clearly identify transformed cells, or may cause substantial nonselective inhibition of transformants and nontransformants alike, thus causing the selection technique to fail. It is proposed that selection with a growth inhibiting compound, such as an antibiotic, at concentrations below those that cause 100%> inhibition followed by screening of growing tissue for expression of a screenable marker gene, such as gus (beta- glucuronidase) or lux (luciferase), would allow one to recover transformants from cell or tissue types that are not amenable to selection alone. Therefore combinations of selection and screening can enable identification of transformants in a wider variety of cell and tissue types. B. Regeneration and Seed Production Cells that survive the exposure to the selective agent, or cells that have been scored positive in a screening assay, may be cultured in media that supports regeneration of plants. The transformed cells, identified by selection or screening and cultured in an appropriate medium that supports regeneration, will then be allowed to regenerate into mature plants. After the plants have reached the stage of shoot and root development, they may be transferred to a greenhouse for further growth and testing. Mature plants are then obtained from cell lines that are identified as expressing the preselected DNA segment. If possible, the regenerated plants are self pollinated. In addition, pollen obtained from the regenerated plants is crossed to seed grown plants of agronomically important plant genotypes. In some cases, pollen from plants of these genotypes is used to pollinate regenerated plants. The trait is genetically characterized by evaluating the segregation of the trait in first and later generation progeny. The heritability and expression in plants of traits selected in tissue culture are of particular importance if the traits are to be commercially useful. Regenerated plants can be repeatedly crossed to other plant genotypes in order to introgress the preselected DNA segment into the genome of the other plants. This process is referred to as backcross conversion. When a sufficient number of crosses to the recurrent parent have been completed in order to produce a product of the backcross conversion process that is substantially isogenic with the recurrent parent except for the presence of the introduced preselected DNA segment, the plant is self-pollinated at least once in order to produce a homozygous backcross converted plant containing the preselected DNA segment. Progeny of these plants are true breeding. Alternatively, seed from transformed plants regenerated from transformed tissue cultures is grown in the field and self-pollinated to generate true breeding plants. Progeny from these plants become true breeding lines. Once the initial breeding lines are selected, test crosses are made and hybrid seed is produced. The testcross hybrids and breeding populations are planted in several different arrays in the field. One scheme of evaluation is to grow populations of hybrid plants containing the preselected DNA segment in many different locations and measure the performance of the plants at these different locations. Yield information as well as other measures of plant health, superiority and viability are made. The information regarding the performance of these hybrids along with that of the performance of non-transformed hybrids is compared. Upon the identification of the superior performance of transgenic plants, the parent selections are advanced and an inbred line is produced through conventional breeding techniques. Hybrid plants having one or more parents containing the preselected DNA segment are tested in commercial testing and evaluation programs and performance documented. This testing includes the evaluation of performance trials carried out over a wide geographical area, as well as the use of dedicated trials to reveal performance advantage and hence value. An additional advantage of the expression of the preselected DNA segment is the superior performance of the parental lines in the production of hybrids. C. Characterization To confirm the presence of the preselected DNA segment(s) or "transgene(s)" in the regenerating plants, a variety of assays may be performed. Such assays include, for example, "molecular biological" assays well known to those of skill in the art, such as Southern and Northern blotting and PCR; "biochemical" assays, such as detecting the presence of a protein product, e.g., by immunological means (ELISAs and Western blots) or by enzymatic function; plant part assays, such as leaf or root assays; and also, by analyzing the phenotype of the whole regenerated plant. 1. DNA Integration, RNA Expression and Inheritance Genomic DNA may be isolated from callus cell lines or any plant parts to determine the presence of the preselected DNA segment through the use of techniques well known to those skilled in the art. Note that intact sequences may not always be present, presumably due to rearrangement or deletion of sequences in the cell. The presence of DNA elements introduced through the methods of this invention may be determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Using this technique discreet fragments of DNA are amplified and detected by gel electrophoresis. This type of analysis permits one to determine whether a preselected DNA segment is present in a stable transformant, but does not prove integration of the introduced preselected DNA segment into the host cell genome. In addition, it is not possible using PCR techniques to determine whether transformants have exogenous genes introduced into different sites in the genome, i.e., whether transformants are of independent origin. It is contemplated that using PCR techniques it would be possible to clone fragments of the host genomic DNA adjacent to an introduced preselected DNA segment. Positive proof of DNA integration into the host genome and the independent identities of transformants may be determined using the technique of Southern hybridization. Using this technique, specific DNA sequences that were introduced into the host genome and flanking host DNA sequences can be identified. Hence the Southern hybridization pattern of a given transformant serves as an identifying characteristic of that transformant. In addition, it is possible through Southern hybridization to demonstrate the presence of introduced preselected DNA segments in high molecular weight DNA, i.e., confirm that the introduced preselected DNA segment has been integrated into the host cell genome. The technique of Southern hybridization provides information that is obtained using PCR, e.g., the presence of a preselected DNA segment, but also demonstrates stable integration into the genome and characterizes each individual transformant. It is contemplated that using the techniques of dot or slot blot hybridization which are modifications of Southern hybridization techniques one can obtain the same information that is derived from PCR, e.g., the presence of a preselected DNA segment. Both PCR and Southern hybridization techniques can be used to demonstrate transmission of a preselected DNA segment to progeny. In most instances the characteristic Southern hybridization pattern for a given transformant will segregate in progeny as one or more Mendelian genes (Spencer et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 18, 201 (1992); Laursen et al., Plant Mol. Biol.. 24, 51 (1994)) indicating stable inheritance of the gene. Whereas DNA analysis techniques may be conducted using DNA isolated from any part of a plant, RNA may only be expressed in particular cells or tissue types and hence it will be necessary to prepare RNA for analysis from these tissues. PCR techniques may also be used for detection and quantitation of RNA produced from introduced preselected DNA segments. In this application of PCR it is first necessary to reverse transcribe RNA into DNA, using enzymes such as reverse transcriptase, and then through the use of conventional PCR techniques amplify the DNA. In most instances PCR techniques, while useful, will not demonstrate integrity of the RNA product. Further information about the nature of the RNA product may be obtained by Northern blotting. This technique will demonstrate the presence of an RNA species and give information about the integrity of that RNA. The presence or absence of an RNA species can also be determined using dot or slot blot Northern hybridizations. These techniques are modifications of Northern blotting and will only demonstrate the presence or absence of an RNA species. 2. Gene Expression While Southern blotting and PCR may be used to detect the preselected DNA segment in question, they do not provide information as to whether the preselected DNA segment is being expressed. Expression may be evaluated by specifically identifying the protein products of the introduced preselected DNA segments or evaluating the phenotypic changes brought about by their expression. Assays for the production and identification of specific proteins may make use of physical-chemical, structural, functional, or other properties of the proteins. Unique physical-chemical or structural properties allow the proteins to be separated and identified by electrophoretic procedures, such as native or denaturing gel electrophoresis or isoelectric focussing, or by chromatographic techniques such as ion exchange or gel exclusion chromatography. Specific antibodies may be used to detect the unique structures of proteins via formats such as an ELISA assay, for example to detect npt II. Combinations of approaches may be employed to obtain even greater specificity such as western blotting, in which antibodies are used that bind to individual gene products that have been separated by electrophoretic techniques. Additional techniques may be employed to absolutely confirm the identity of the product of interest, such as evaluation by amino acid sequencing following purification. Although these procedures are among the most commonly employed, other procedures may be additionally used. Assay procedures may also be used to identify the expression of proteins by their functionality, especially the ability of enzymes to catalyze specific chemical reactions involving specific substrates and products. These reactions may be followed by providing and quantifying the loss of substrates or the generation of products of the reactions by physical or chemical procedures. Very frequently the expression of a gene product is determined by evaluating the phenotypic results of its expression. These assays also may take many forms including but not limited to analyzing changes in the chemical composition, morphology, or physiological properties of the plant. Chemical composition may be altered by expression of preselected DNA segments encoding proteins which affect pigmentation of plant parts and may be detected phenotypically, or by a product, which is increased when the protein encoded by the preselected DNA segment is expressed, that may be analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography or ELISA (e.g., npt II). D. Establishment of the Introduced DNA in Other Plant Varieties Fertile, transgenic plants may then be used in a conventional plant breeding program in order to incorporate the preselected DNA segment into the desired lines or varieties. Generally, the commercial value of the transformed plant produced herein will be greatest if the preselected DNA segment can be incorporated into many different hybrid combinations. A farmer typically grows several hybrids based on differences in maturity, standability, and other agronomic traits. Also, the farmer must select a hybrid based upon his or her geographic location since hybrids adapted to one region are generally not adapted to another because of differences in such traits as maturity, disease, drought and insect resistance. As such, it is necessary to incorporate the gene into a large number of parental lines so that many hybrid combinations can be produced containing the preselected DNA segment. Plant breeding and the techniques and skills required to transfer genes from one line or variety to another are well known to those skilled in the art. Thus, introducing a preselected DNA segment, preferably in the form of recombinant DNA, into any other line or variety can be accomplished by these breeding procedures. E. Uses of Transgenic Plants The transgenic plants produced herein are expected to be useful for a variety of commercial and research purposes. Transgenic plants can be created for use in traditional agriculture to possess traits beneficial to the grower (e.g., agronomic traits such as resistance to water deficit, pest resistance, herbicide resistance or increased yield), beneficial to the consumer of the grain harvested from the plant (e.g., improved nutritive content in human food or animal feed), or beneficial to the food processor (e.g., improved processing traits). In such uses, the plants are generally grown for the use of their grain in human or animal foods. However, other parts of the plants, including stalks, husks, vegetative parts, and the like, may also have utility, including use as part of animal silage or for ornamental purposes. Often, chemical constituents of crops are extracted for foods or industrial use and transgenic plants may be created which have enhanced or modified levels of such components. Transgenic plants may also find use in the commercial manufacture of proteins or other compounds, where the compound of interest is extracted or purified from plant parts, seeds, and the like. Cells or tissue from the plants may also be cultured, grown in vitro, or fermented to manufacture such molecules. The transgenic plants may also be used in commercial breeding programs, or may be crossed or bred to plants of related crop species. Improvements encoded by the preselected DNA segment may be transferred, e.g., from cells of one plant species to cells of another plant species, e.g., by protoplast fusion. The transgenic plants may have many uses in research or breeding, including creation of new mutant plants through insertional mutagenesis, in order to identify beneficial mutants that might later be created by traditional mutation and selection. An example would be the introduction of a recombinant DNA sequence encoding a transposable element that may be used for generating genetic variation. The methods of the invention may also be used to create plants having unique "signature sequences" or other marker sequences which can be used to identify proprietary lines or varieties. The invention will be further described by the following examples. Example I Expression Cassettes for Plant Transformation To prepare an expression cassette comprising a ScBV promoter, three regions of the ScBV genome were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The regions are upstream of open reading frames, upstream of a putative tRNA binding site, and do not include AUG codons. The PCR employed BamHI linearized pScBV-20 as the template (Bouhida et al., J. Gen. Virol.. 74, 1 (1993)). Primer pairs employed in the PCR are shown in Table 1. The amplification reactions resulted in the following regions of the ScBV genome being amplified: nucleotide positions 5999 to 7205 (amplified with primer SCBV-PRO FORW-5999, SEQ ID NO:6 and primer SCBV-PRO REV-7205, SEQ ID NO:7), 5999 to 7299 (amplified with primer SCBV-PRO FORW-5999, SEQ ID NO:6 and primer SCBV-PRO REV-7299, SEQ ID NO:8), and 5999 to 7420 (amplified with primer SCBV-PRO FORW-5999; SEQ ID NO:6 and primer SCBV-PRO REV-7420, SEQ ID NO:9) (according to the numbering system in Bouhida et al., supra). SCBV-PRO FORW-5999 was synthesized to include a PstI site. SCBV-PRO REV-7205, SCBV-PRO REV-7299 and SCBV- PRO REV-7420 were synthesized to include a StuI site. After amplification, the PCR products were digested with PstI and StuI and then gel purified. To prepare monocot expression vectors, the gel fragments were ligated to pMON755i (Medberry and Olszewski, Plant J.. 3, 619 (1993)), which had been digested with PstI and StuI to remove the CaMV35S promoter fragment. pMON755i was derived from pMON755 (Medberry et al., The Plant Cell. 4, 185 (1992)) by inserting a modified maize alcohol dehydrogenase first intron segment 5' to the GUS gene. The resulting plasmids were designated ScBV-1 (5999-7205), ScBV-2 (5999-7299), and ScBV-3 (5999-7420). Table 1 Primer name Sequence 5 '-3 ' SCBV-PRO FORW 5999 CTCTAGCTGCAGGAAGTTGAAGACAAAAGAAG (SEQ ID NO: 6) SCBV-PRO REV-7205 GTACGTAGGCCTCACTGAATGGGCCCAGTAC (SEQ ID NO:7) SCBV-PRO REV-7299 TACGATAGGCCTTGGCAGACAAGGAATAAAG (SEQ ID NO: 8) SCBV-PRO REV-7420 GCACGAAGGCCTTGGTGAACTACCGATGATC (SEQ ID NO:9) MAP-SCBV-GUS CAGGACGGACCATGGATATATCTCC (SEQ ID NO: 10) 35 To prepare expression vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, a binary expression vector was constructed. ScBV-3 was digested with PstI and StuI and a 1.4 kb ScBV-containing fragment was ligated to pBluscript KS + (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), which had been digested with Spel, the overhanging ends filled in with Klenow fragment, and then digested with PstI. From the resulting construct, a Xhol-Xbal fragment was isolated and ligated to pOCAlOl, which had been digested with Sail and Xbal. pOCAlOl is a derivative of pOCA28 (Medberry et al., Nucl. Acids Res.. 18, 5505 (1990)) in which the polylinker is replaced by a Hindlll-EcoRI fragment containing the GUS gene. pOCA28 (Olszewski et al., Nucl. Acids Res..16, 10765 (1988)) has a SmVSpc r gene from pHP45omega (Prenti and Kritsch, Gene. 28, 303 (1984)) which replaces a Bglll/Smal fragment containing a tetracycline resistance gene. To map the transcription start site of a ScBV promoter, a labeled primer or DNA fragment and RNA generated from the ScBV promoter are employed in a primer extension reaction and/or a S 1 nuclease reaction. A primer useful to map the transcription start site of a ScBV promoter is shown in Table 1 (MAP- SCBV-GUS-.SEQ ID NO: 10). Example II Monocot (Oat) Transformation with ScBV Promoter Constructs Transient expression analyses in maize (using Black Mexican Sweet cells, "BMS" cells) and oat suspension cultures showed that ScBV-3 gave the highest levels of expression. In particular, in BMS cells, ScBV-3 conferred expression that gave rise to approximately 25 and 800 times more independent events that produced GUS expressing cells than the expression conferred by ScBV-2 or ρScBV-1 , respectively. Immature embryos of oat (Avenα sαtivα L. variety GP-1) were used to initiate callus. Friable embryogenic callus was visually selected using a low power microscope (6.6x) and subcultured every two weeks on MS2D medium containing MS salts (Torbert et al, supra). Callus derived tissue was plated onto solid MS2D medium containing 0.2 M sorbitol and 0.2 M mannitol as an osmoticum pretreatment for 4 hours prior to microprojectile bombardment as described by Vain et al. (Plant Cell Reports.12, 84 (1993)). In general, either tungsten (1.1 micron; M-17; Biorad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) or gold (1.0 micron; M-17; Biorad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) particles may be employed for microparticle bombardment. Approximately 60 mg of dry tungsten or gold particles is placed in 1 ml of 100%> ethanol in a microtube. The tube is vortexed on high for 1 -2 minutes, or sonicated using a standard tip at low power for 30 seconds. The vortexing is repeated three times. Then the microtube is subjected to centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 1 minute. The supernatant is removed and 1 ml of sterile distilled water is added, the particles resuspended, centrifuged and the supernatant removed. This process is repeated once more. The particles are then resuspended in 1 ml sterile distilled water. Fifty microliters, enough for 4-8 bombardments, is aliquoted into microtubes while vortexing. Tungsten or gold aliquots are stored at -20 °C. To a single 50 micro liter aliquot of particles under continuous agitation the following is added in the following order: 5 microliters of DNA (1 microgram/microliter), 50 microliters of 2.5 M CaCl 2 and 20 microliters of 0.1 M spermidine (free base, tissue culture grade, Sigma Chemical Co.). The mixture is vortexed for 3 minutes, subjected to centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 seconds and the supernatant removed. The DNA coated particles are washed with 250 microliters of 100%) ethanol by vortexing briefly, then subjected to centrifugation, and the supernatant removed. The particles are then resuspended in 60 microliters of 100%> ethanol. 5-10 microliters of the suspension is then added to the center of the macrocarrier. The suspension is allowed to dry in a low-humidity and vibration-free environment for about 1 minute. Approximately 800 mg of tissue was placed in the center of a Petri plate. The plate was positioned 5 cm below the stopping plate, and the tissue bombarded with gold particles coated with pScBV-3 and a plasmid that contains the nptll plant selectable marker linked to the CaMV35S promoter (pH24, see Torbert et al., supra) (0.625 micrograms/bombardment), using Biolistic® PDS- 1000/He Particle Delivery System (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) operated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Tissue remained on the osmoticum medium (MS2D plus 0.4 M osmoticum) overnight and was transferred to MS2D maintenance media for 7 days at 20 °C in the dark. Transformed tissue was transferred to selection medium containing 50 mg/L paromomycin solidified with 0.35%> low EEO Type I agarose (Sigma Chemical Co.) and subcultured every 2 weeks (Torbert et al., supra)). Growing colonies were isolated after about 6-8 weeks and allowed to grow for up to about 4 additional weeks. Shoots were regenerated in shoot regeneration medium (MS salts plus thiamine-HCl, 20 g/L sucrose, 2 mg/L NAA, 0.2 mg/L BAP, 50 mg/L paromomycin, pH 5.8, solidified with 0.35%> low EEO Type I agarose). Roots were regenerated in root regeneration medium (MS salts plus thiamine-HCl solidified with 0.35%) low EEO Type I agarose). Plants were then placed into soil and grown to maturity. 38 Table 2 Tissue Relative 1 Level of # of Lines with Detectable Expression 2 Expression Leaf* + 2 23# (91.3%) Stem +++ 21/23 (91.3%) Peduncle ++ 20/23 (86.9%) Rachis ++ 21/23 (91.3%) Glume ++ 23/23 (100%) Rachilla ++ 21/23 (91.3%) Palea +++ 22/23 (95.6%) Lemma +++ 22/23 (95.6%) Anther ++ 20/23 (86.9%) Ovary +++ 19/23 (82.6%) Mature Seed +++ 2/2 (100%) l Relative level of detectable expression shown as (+) signs: (+), (++), and (+++) corresponds to low-medium, medium-high, and high-very high relative histochemical staining, respectively. Generalized expression pattern of the ScBV promoter based on 23 stably transformed, independent lines. •Number of lines with detectable expression/#Number of lines examined. *Vascular expression. In stably transformed tissues of A. sativa, ScBV-3 conferred constitutive GUS expression in vegetative organs, most notably the stem (Figure 5E). In the leaf, however, ScBV-3 conferred an expression pattern which is mostly, but not exclusively, confined to the vascular tissue (Figure 5F). ScBV-3 also resulted in constitutive GUS expression in floral organs such as the palea, lemma, and the ovary (Figure 5D and 5B). Regenerated plants (TO generation) were screened for GUS activity. Fifty-six plants were recovered, and in some cases multiple plants were recovered from the same callus. Plants which were derived from the same callus were defined as one line. Since plants derived from the same callus could 39 potentially represent independent events, data for plants recovered from an individual callus was pooled. Oat tissues were hand sectioned from plants with floral organs and green vegetative tissue. Twenty three stably transformed independent lines were analyzed for GUS expression. Plant tissues were stained with GUS histochemical staining buffer in the presence of 1 :5000 (v/v) dilution of the detergent Silwet L-77 (OSI Specialties, Charleston, WV) and subjected to vacuum for 20 minutes. Tissues were stained for 8-48 hours at room temperature, destained for 24 hours and stored in 70% ethanol for analysis. GUS expression was scored under a dissecting microscope. The results of the GUS analysis are shown in Table 2. GUS activity was detected in almost all of the A. sativa organs tested, and lines with GUS activity in one organ tended to have activity in all of the organs tested. Stem, palea, lemma and ovary had the highest levels of expression. Moreover, of the twenty three independent lines tested, over 82% had detectable levels of GUS expression in leaf, stem, peduncle, rachis, glume, rachilla, palea, lemma, anther and ovary. Npt II levels in plant cells, parts or tissues are determined by an NPTII ELISA assay (5'→3\ Boulder, CO) as also described in Torbert et al. (supra). Npt II is detected in all lines which express GUS. A. sativa florets were collected from mature plants (no vegetative tissue). Tl seeds were produced by self-pollination of TO plants. These seeds were dehulled and then sterilized by soaking first in 95% ethanol for 30 seconds, and then in 2.5%> bleach and 1-2 drops of Tween-20/100 ml, for 5 minutes, followed by washing three times with sterile water. Seeds were germinated in magenta boxes on MS medium lacking hormones, grown for 10-12 days, and transferred to soil. Prior to transferring to soil, excised roots of the T, plants were subjected to staining for GUS gene expression as described above.. A. sativa progeny (T j ) plants, and Tl seedlings, were subjected to analysis for GUS gene expression. 40 Table 3. GUS gene expression in sativa T seedlings Relative level No. Lines with Tissue of expression 2 Detectable expression Leaf* ++ 8*/9 #Λ (88.9%) Roots ++ 4/9 (44.4%) Endosperm + 9/9 (100%) 1 The relative level of expression is indicated by the number of +'s: (+), (++), and (+++) corresponding to low-medium, medium-high, and high-very high histochemical staining, respectively. 2 Generalized expression pattern of the ScBV-3 genomic region based on 9 stably-transformed, independent lines. * Number of lines with detectable expression/" Number of lines examined. & Vascular expression. Λ Seedlings from nine lines were recovered in the T, generation. Both seeds and Tl plants showed GUS activity, thus demonstrating that the GUS gene was heritable. The results of GUS analysis of Tl plants is shown in Table 4. Relative to the TO plants, the level of expression in Tl appeared to be reduced in most organs (Table 2 and Table 4). This result suggests that the expression is reduced in the progeny. 41 Table 4. GUS gene expression in mature A. sativa T, plants Relative level No. Lines with Tissue of expression 2 Detectable expression Leaf* + 57T (71.4%) Stern ++ 5/7 (71.4%) Peduncle + 3/7 (42.8%) Rachis + 3/7 (42.8%) Rachilla + 6/7 (85.7%) Glume ++ 7/7 (100%) Palea ++ 6/7 (85.7%) Lemma ++ 6/7 (85.7%) Anther ++ 3/7 (42.8%) Ovary ++ 6/7 (85.7%) Awn - 0/3 (0%) 1 The relative level of expression is indicated by the number of +'s: (+), (++), and (+++) corresponding to low-medium, medium-high, and high-very high histochemical staining, respectively. 2 Generalized expression pattern of the ScBV-3 genomic region based on 7 stably-transformed, independent lines. * Number of lines with detectable expression/" Number of lines examined. & Vascular expression. Λ Plants from seven out of the nine T j lines grew to maturity. 42 Example III Dicot (Arabidopsis) Transformation with ScBV Promoter Constructs An expression vector which comprised a ScBV promoter linked to the GUS gene was transformed into Arabidopsis thaliana (Columbia ecotype) by vacuum infiltration essentially as described in van Hoof and Green, Plant J.. 10. 415 (1996); Bechtold et al, C. r. Acad. Sci.. 316. 1194 (1993) with the following modifications: 200 μl/L of Silwet L-33 was employed in the infiltration solution and Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58C1 (pMP 90) was employed as a non- eukaryotic host for the expression vector. Seeds from plants which were subjected to the vacuum infiltration method (designated T, seeds) were sown on kanamycin-containing plates as described by Feldmann (In: "Methods in Arabidopsis Research" (C. Koncz, N.- H. Chua, and J. Schell, Eds.). World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, pp. 274-289 (1992)). Individual plants (T, plants) carrying the kanamycin marker gene were transferred to soil. Tissues from these plants were stained to localize GUS activity as described above for A. sativa tissue, except that the Silwet L-77 detergent was used at 1: 10,000 dilution (v/v) and the staining solution was vacuum infiltrated into the tissue by subjecting it to a vacuum for 5 minutes. Seeds of the Υ l plants (T 2 plants) were collected and progeny plants (T 2 plants) were also stained for GUS activity. Tables 5 and 6 show the generalized pattern of expression of the ScBV promoter in Tl and T2 A. thaliana plants, respectively. Twenty-nine Tl plants were examined which were derived from 7 infiltrated plants. All transformed seedlings which were derived from a single infiltrated plant were grouped into one line. In A. thaliana flowers, the expression pattern is mostly vascular, yet the stamen in some of the flowers exhibited constitutive GUS gene expression (Figure 5C). When roots of A. sativa were stained, GUS expression was detected in 44% of the lines examined, whereas for A. thaliana roots, constitutive GUS gene expression was found in 86%> of the lines examined. 43 Table 5. GUS gene expression in thaliana T, plants Relative 1 level No. Lines with Tissue of expression 2 Detectable expression Rosette Petiole 4*/7" (57%) Rosette leaf ++ 7/7 (100%) Inflorescence stem 3/7 (43%) Peduncle 4/7 (57%) Flower sepal & ++ 4/7 (57%) 1 The relative level of expression is indicated by the number of +'s: (+), (++), and (+++) corresponding to low-medium, medium-high, and high- very high histochemical staining, respectively. 2 Generalized expression pattern of the ScBV-3 genomic region based on 7 stably-transformed, independent lines. * Number of lines with detectable expression/* Number of lines examined. & Vascular expression. 44 Table 6. GUS gene expression in A. thaliana T, plants Relative 1 level No. Lines with Tissue of expression 2 Detectable expression Rosette Petiole +++ 7*/7 # (100%) Rosette leaf +++ 7/7 (100%) Cauline Leaf ++ 7/7 (100%) Inflorescence stem ++ 7/7 (100%) Root +++ 6/7 (86%) Flower sepal & +++ 7/7 (100%,) Silique & +++ 6/6 (100%) Seed ® +++ 4/6 (67%) 1 The relative level of expression is indicated by the number of +'s: (+), (++), and (+++) corresponding to low-medium, medium-high, and high-very high histochemical staining, respectively. 2 Generalized expression pattern of the ScBV-3 genomic region based on 7 stably-transformed, independent lines. * Number of lines with detectable expression/" Number of lines examined. & Vascular expression. @ T 3 seeds. Example IV Introduction of an ScBV Promoter Construct into Soybean Cells. Regeneration of Transformed R0 Plants and Progeny Production Soybean explants are derived from meristems excised from the embryonic axes of immature seeds. Prior to transformation, meristem explants are pre-incubated in high cytokinin-containing medium (Barwhale et al., Planta. 176. 473 (1986)) overnight. The bottom of a 60 mm Petri dish is filled with 1% water agar. The embryos are surface sterilized and plated unto the agar in the Petri dish. A quantity of 1-3 micrometer gold beads (Alfa Chemical Co.) are precoated with polylysine by being rinsed in 0.02% polylysine and air drying. A linearized expression vector, which comprises a ScBV promoter sequence, e.g., linearized expression vector, which comprises a ScBV promoter sequence, e.g., SEQ ID NO:3, operably linked to a preselected DNA segment, is prepared. Preferably, the expression vector further comprises a marker gene, such as the neo gene (APT 3 'II). 225 micrograms of the expression vector in aqueous solution is added to 35 mg coated gold beads and then sequentially 22 microliters of 10 mM Na 2 HPO 4 and 22 microliters of 10 raM CaCl 2 which form a fine precipitate as the solution is dried under N 2 . In general, 1.0 to 0.001 mg of DNA per mg of gold beads is prepared. The dried precipitate coated beads are then resuspended in 100%) ethanol and deposited unto 2.0 millimeter plastic coated aluminized mylar sheets approximately 9 mm by 11 mm. The coated beads are applied to give a final density of 0.2 mg/cm 2 on the mylar carrier sheet. In general, the carrier sheet is loaded with 0.05-40 mg of loaded beads per square centimeter. A vacuum of 500 mm of mercury is applied. A 24 kV discharge from the 2 microfarad capacitor is discharged through the electrodes accelerating the particles at the soybean embryo. The bombarded embryos are removed from the target surface and plated unto plates for organogenesis procedures. For example, see Barwhale et al., Planta. 176. 473 (1986)). The explants are plated in the dark on MS basal medium as modified by Barwhale et al. (supra). Following incubation of 1 to 2 weeks in the dark, the tissues are transferred to the same basal medium which contains a lower level of cytokinin (1.7 micromolar), to promote shoot elongation. Shoots are harvested at 0.5 to 1.0 cm in height. Three to eight shoots are recovered per explant at 2-4 months. After shoots reach 0.5-1.0 cm in height, they are grafted onto the roots of germinating approximately ten days old soybean seedlings. Prior to grafting they are hardened on 1/2 MS medium for one week. As soon as sufficient plant tissue is achieved, the tissues are assayed for the presence of the marker gene. For example, if the neo gene is used as a marker gene, APH 3 'II activity is assayed in plant tissues. The presence of the preselected DNA molecule of interest, e.g., encoding a viral coat protein, is detected by Southern blot analysis. Ten micrograms of genomic DNA from plant tissue is digested with an appropriate restriction enzyme. The DNA is then phenolxhloroform extracted and precipitated with ammonium acetate and ethanol. The digested DNA is fractionated on an agarose gel by electrophoresis. A 32 P labeled probe corresponding to at least a portion of the DNA molecule of interest is employed. After washing the filter, the hybridizing DNA fragments are visualized by autoradiography. Plants are thus shown to carry the DNA molecule of interest. A plant, the tissues of which demonstrate marker gene enzymatic activity or which are positive by Southern blot analysis for a DNA molecule of interest or the marker gene, is grown to maturity. The plant is self-pollinated and seeds recovered. Seedlings are employed to generate plants, the leaves of which are assayed for marker gene-associated enzymatic activity or by Southern blot analysis for the DNA molecule of interest. Example V Introduction of a ScBV Promoter Construct into Tobacco Cells. Regeneration of Transformed R0 Plants and Progeny Production Tobacco (Nicotiani tabacum var. samsun) leaf disks with diameters of about 6 mm are taken from surface sterilized tobacco leaves. These are cultivated on MS 104 agar medium for two days to promote partial cell wall formation at the wound surfaces. They are then submerged in a culture of A. tumefaciens cells containing a plasmid that has a ScBV promoter operably linked to a preselected DNA segment, e.g., encoding GUS, and another expression cassette encoding kanamycin resistance and pMP90RK, a helper plasmid, which is grown overnight in Luria broth at 28°C, and shaken gently. The cells are removed from the bacterial suspension, blotted dry, and incubated upside down on filter paper placed over "nurse" cultures of tobacco cells as described by Horsch (In Vitro. 16. 103 (1980)). After two or three days, the disks are transferred to petri dishes containing MS media with 500 μg/ml carbenicillin with no nurse culture. Control tissue is created using A. tumefaciens cells containing the helper plasmid pMP90RK and a different plant transformation vector, pMON505, which contained a T-DNA region with a NOS/NPTII/NOS kanamycin resistance gene and a selectable marker gene. Within ten days after transfer to the MS media, actively growing callus tissue appears on the periphery of all disks on both the control and transformed plates. Transformed tobacco plants are then produced by regeneration from the above-described transformed leaf disks by the procedure described by Horsch et al. (Science. 227. 1229 (1985)). The transformed plants obtained contain the expression cassette which contains the ScBV promoter fused to the β- glucuronidase gene. The same procedure is used to obtain transformed tobacco with a CaMV35S promoter fused to the same preselected DNA segment, i.e., GUS. Transformed plants containing the GUS gene driven by either the ScBV promoter or the CaMV35S promoter are assayed using a histological staining procedure to determine GUS activity in the transformed cells. The results of these assays on plants transformed with ScBV/GUS/NOS are compared to the results of the same assays performed on plants transformed with CaMV35S/GUS/NOS. The histochemical assay of the tobacco plants containing the ScBV/GUS/NOS and CaMV35S/GUS/NOS constructs involves examination of plant organs and/or tissue sections of the transformed plants to determine GUS activity. The tissue or organ sections of the transformed plant are prepared by using a razor blade to free-hand section the plant tissue into sections less than 0.5 mm in thickness. The sections are then placed in excess X-gluc solution so that the section was fully covered. Pulling a vacuum on the sections can aid in penetration of X-gluc solution. A 50 ml X-gluc solution is prepared by combining 25 ml of 0.2 M Na 3 PO 4 buffer pH 7.9, 24.0 ml dH 2 O, 0.25 ml 0.1 M K 3 [Fe(CN) 6 ], 0.25 ml 0.1 M K 4 [Fe(CN) 6 ] and 0.5 ml 1 M EDTA, pH 7.0. To this solution, 50 mg of X-gluc (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-idilyl-β-glucuronide) obtained from Research Organics (Cleveland, Ohio) is added and stirred until dissolved. The solution is then preferably sterilized by filtration. The sections in the X-gluc solution are then placed at 37°C for 2-4 hours. Care is taken to prevent evaporation of the solution. After the incubation period, the sections are rinsed with phosphate buffer, or distilled H 2 O, and the sections were examined immediately with a dissecting scope or compound microscope. If there is interference from the pigments, the tissue can be fixed in FAA solution (85 ml 50%) ethanol, 5 ml glacial acetic acid and 10 ml formalin) for 24 hours. Problems with phenolics can be mitigated by the addition of sodium metabisulfite to 20 mM to the staining solution just prior to staining. A positive test for the presence of GUS activity is shown by a blue coloration appearing in the tissue of the assayed plant section. A histological staining assay is performed on a sections transformed with the β-glucuronidase gene driven by either the CaMV35S promoter or the ScBV promoter. A typical staining profile was observed for the CaMV35S promoter driven GUS gene with staining in some tissues and no staining in other tissues within a single transgenic plant. However, tissue from a plant transformed with the ScBV promoter driven GUS gene shows that the transformed plant exhibits a fair, preferably a much higher, level of GUS expression and a more uniform pattern of expression throughout the tissue and cells than observed in tissues from plants transformed with CaMV35S/GUS. This is illustrated by the predominant blue coloration throughout the section. The distribution of expression and the number of highly expressing transgenic plants obtained show that the ScBV promoter is superior in tissue distribution and uniformity of expression when compared to the CaMV/GUS plants. Greater than 90%> of the ScBV/GUS containing transformed plants show fair, preferably very strong GUS expression and that the staining is uniform from plant to plant and tissue to tissue. This staining is consistently as good in the ScBV containing plants as that in the CaMV/GUS plants. In order to provide further evidence that the ScBV promoter is a strong and constituitively expressed promoter, transgenic Nicotiana tabacum plants containing the constructs are assayed for GUS activity using the fluorimetric assay of Jefferson et al. (EMBO J.. 6, 3901 (1987)) in extracted leaves, flowers stems and roots. Incubations are performed at 37°C for 15 minutes. A 1 g 4th internode leaf, a flower, a 4 cm long stem section, or roots are excised. Selected tissue is extracted by freezing in liquid nitrogen, grinding with a mortar and pestle, and resuspending in 1 ml 0.1 M K 3 PO 4 pH 7.8, mM EDTA, 10 mM DT, 0.8 mM PMSF, and 5%> glycerol. The fluorogenic reaction was carried out in 2 mM 4-methyl umbelliferyl glucuronide. Fluorescence is measured using a Hoechst DNA fluorometer (Model TKO 100). Protein concentrations of plant extracts are determined by Bradford assay. The CaMV35S promoter is arbitrarily given an expression level of "1 " for each tissue analyzed and the relative expression level of the ScBV promoter is then determined. The GUS expression obtained with the ScBV promoter is found to be superior to that obtained with the CaMV35S promoter. The invention is not limited to the exact details shown and described, for it should be understood that many variations and modifications may be made while remaining within the spirit and scope of the invention defined by the claims.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. An isolated and purified DNA molecule comprising a preselected DNA segment comprising a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter, or a biologically active subunit thereof. 2. The DNA molecule of claim 1 wherein the preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO :3. 3. The DNA molecule of claim 1 wherein the preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO:4. 4. The DNA molecule of claim 1 wherein the preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO:5. 5. An expression cassette comprising a first preselected DNA segment which comprises a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter, or a biologically active subunit thereof, functional in a host cell operably linked to a second preselected DNA segment encoding a protein, RNA transcript, or a combination thereof. 6. The expression cassette of claim 5 further comprising a third preselected DNA segment encoding an amino terminal chloroplast transit peptide which is operably linked to the second preselected DNA segment. 7. The expression cassette of claim 5 wherein the first preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO:3. 8. The expression cassette of claim 5 wherein the first preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO:4. 9. The expression cassette of claim 5 wherein the first preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO: 5. 10. The expression cassette of claim 5 which further comprises an enhancer element. 11. The expression cassette of claim 5 wherein the second preselected DNA segment comprises a selectable marker gene or a reporter gene. 12. The expression cassette of claim 5 wherein the promoter is constitutively expressed in the host cell. 13. The expression cassette of claim 5 wherein the host cell is a plant cell. 14. The expression cassette of claim 13 wherein the host cell is a dicot cell. 15. The expression cassette of claim 13 wherein the host cell is a monocot cell. 16. A method for producing transformed plant cells comprising the steps of (i) introducing into regenerable plant cells a recombinant DNA segment which comprises a first preselected DNA segment comprising a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter operably linked to a second preselected DNA segment so as to yield transformed cells, and (ii) identifying or selecting a transformed cell line. 17. A method for producing a fertile transgenic plant comprising the steps of (i) introducing into regenerable plant cells a recombinant DNA segment which comprises a first preselected DNA segment comprising a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter operably linked to a preselected second DNA segment so as to yield transformed cells, (ii) identifying or selecting a population of transformed cells, and (iii) regenerating a fertile transgenic plant therefrom, wherein said recombinant DNA segment is transmitted through a complete sexual cycle of said transgenic plant to its progeny. 18. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein the regenerable plant cells are monocot plant cells. 19. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein the regenerable plant cells are dicot plant cells. 20. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein the recombinant DNA molecule is introduced into the plant cells by a method selected from the group consisting of Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer, electroporation, protoplast transformation, and microprojectile bombardment. 21. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein the first preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO:3. 22. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein the first preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO:4. 23. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein the first preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO:5. 24. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein the recombinant DNA segment is expressed so as to impart a phenotypic characteristic to the transformed cells. 25. The method of claim 17 wherein the recombinant DNA segment is expressed in the fertile transgenic plant so as to impart a phenotypic characteristic to the plant. 26. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein the second preselected DNA segment comprises a selectable marker gene or a reporter gene. 27. A method comprising obtaining progeny from a fertile transgenic plant obtained by the method of claim 17 which comprise said recombinant DNA. 28. The method of claim 27 wherein said progeny are obtained by crossing said fertile transgenic plant with a plant of the same species. 29. The method of claim 27 comprising obtaining seed from said progeny and obtaining further progeny plants comprising said recombinant DNA from said seed. 30. The method of claim 29 wherein the progeny obtained are crossed back to a plant of the same species, to obtain further progeny which comprise said recombinant DNA. 31. The method of claim 30 wherein seeds are obtained from further said progeny plants and plants comprising said recombinant DNA are recovered from said seed. 32. The method of claim 30 wherein said further progeny are crossed back to a plant of the same species to obtain progeny which comprise said recombinant DNA. 33. A transformed plant regenerated from the transformed plant cells obtained by the method of claim 16. 34. A transformed seed of the transformed plant of claim 33. 35. A TO transgenic plant produced by the method of claim 17 which comprises said recombinant DNA segment. 36. A seed produced by the transgenic TO plant of claim 35 which comprises said recombinant DNA segment. 37. A Tl transgenic plant derived from the plant of claim 35 wherein said Tl plant comprises said recombinant DNA segment. 38. A progeny transgenic plant derived from the plant of claim 37 wherein said progeny plant comprises said recombinant DNA segment. 39. The plant of claim 35, 37 or 38 wherein the recombinant DNA segment is expressed so that the transgenic plant exhibits a phenotypic characteristic that renders the transgenic plant identifiable over a corresponding untransformed plant. 40. A transformed monocot plant, the cells of which comprise a recombinant DNA segment comprising a first preselected DNA segment comprising a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter operably linked to a second preselected DNA segment, wherein the second preselected DNA segment is expressed so as to render the transformed plant identifiable over the corresponding untransformed plant. 41. A transformed dicot plant, the cells of which comprise a recombinant DNA segment comprising a first preselected DNA segment comprising a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter operably linked to a second preselected DNA segment, wherein the second preselected DNA segment is expressed so as to render the transformed plant identifiable over the corresponding untransformed plant. 42. A fertile transgenic plant comprising a recombinant DNA segment comprising a first preselected DNA segment comprising a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter operably linked to a second preselected DNA segment, wherein the second preselected DNA segment is expressed in the cells of the transgenic plant in an amount that is different than the amount in the cells of a plant which only differ from the cells of the transgenic plant in that the recombinant DNA segment is absent, and wherein the recombinant DNA segment is transmitted through a complete normal sexual cycle of the transgenic plant to the next generation. 43. A seed produced by the plant of claim 40, 41 or 42. 44. A progeny plant derived from the seed of claim 43. 45. A progeny seed derived from the plant of claim 40, 41 or 42. 46. The fertile transgenic plant of claim 42 that is a monocot. 47. The fertile transgenic plant of claim 42 that is a dicot. 48. The plant of claim 40, 41 or 42 wherein the first preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO:3. 49. The plant of claim 40, 41 or 42 wherein the first preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO:4. 50. The plant of claim 40, 41 or 42 wherein the first preselected DNA segment comprises SEQ ID NO:5.

Inventors: LOCKHART BENHAM, OLSZEWSKI NEIL, SOMERS DAVID A, TORBERT KIMBERLY, TZAFRIR IRIS, LOCKHART, BENHAM, OLSZEWSKI, NEIL, SOMERS, DAVID, A., TORBERT, KIMBERLY, TZAFRIR, IRIS
Applicants: LOCKHART BENHAM, OLSZEWSKI NEIL, SOMERS DAVID A, TORBERT KIMBERLY, TZAFRIR IRIS, UNIV MINNESOTA, LOCKHART, BENHAM, OLSZEWSKI, NEIL, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, SOMERS, DAVID, A., TORBERT, KIMBERLY, TZAFRIR, IRIS
Application year: 1997
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: C07K14, C12N15