BROAD SPECTRUM PYROGENIC EXOTOXINS ANTAGONISTS AND VACCINES

Abstract: The invention relates to peptides comprising an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino sequence of a fragment of a pyrogenic exotoxin, and functional derivatives of said peptides, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins. Preferred peptides comprise an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino sequence of a fragment of Staphylococcal aureus enterotoxin B (SEB). The invention also relates to broad spectrum pharmaceutical compositions for the treatment or short term prophylaxis of toxin-mediated activation of T cells, comprising as active ingredient at least one peptide according to the invention or derivative thereof, and to broad spectrum vaccines for conferring long term immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin are provided. The vaccines comprising as active ingredient at least one peptide according to the invention, or derivative thereof.

Description: BROAD SPECTRUM PYROGENIC EXOTOXINS ANTAGONISTS AND VACCINES FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to peptides structurally related to protein domains in pyrogenic exotoxins, capable of antagonizing activation of T cells mediated by said exotoxins and of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by said exotoxins. The invention further relates to pharmaceutical preparations containing the said peptides, for the treatment or prophylaxis of toxic shock and to vaccines containing the said peptides, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by said exotoxins. The U.S. Government has a nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable paid-up licensee to practice or have practiced this invention for or on its behalf as provided for by the terms of Contract No. DAMD17-93-C-3108 awarded by the U.S. Department of the Army. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION A family of pyrogenic exotoxins, also known as superantigenic toxins, is produced by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. The exotoxins comprised of the S. aureus enterotoxins (SEs) cause the majority of human food poisoning cases manifested by vomiting and diarrhea after ingestion [Schlievert, J Infect Dis 167:997 (1993)]. S. aureus is found widespread in nature, often in association with humans. Among the 5 major serological types within the family of SEs (labeled SEA to SEE and SEG), SEB is the most prominent [Marrack and Kappler, Science 248:705 (1990)]. SEB has also been recognized as a leading cause of human cases of non-menstrual toxic shock syndrome that can accompany surgical or injurious wound infections, as well as viral infections of the respiratory tract of influenza patients to which children are especially vulnerable [Schlievert (1993) ibid ; Tseng et al., Infect Immun 63:2880 (1995)]. Toxic shock syndrome, in its most severe form, causes shock and death [Murray et al., ASM News 61:229 (1995); Schlievert (1993) ibid.]. More generally, members of the staphylococcal exotoxin family, including SEA to SEE and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1), have been implicated in toxic shock syndrome, in atopic dermatitis [Schlievert (1993) ibid. ] and in Kawasaki's syndrome [Bohach et al., Crit Rev Microbiol 17:251 (1990)]. SUBSTITUTE SHEET RULE 6 Because of the potential for causing lethal shock in humans after aerosol exposure and because of the relative ease with which SEB can be produced in large amounts, there is concern that SEB could be used as a biological weapon [Lowell et al.. Infect Immun 64: 1706 (1996)]. SEB is thought to be a biological weapon mainly in view of its lethal potential. However, through its exquisite ability to induce vomiting and diarrhea, SEB is also an incapacitating agent that could severely impair the effectiveness of a fighting force, even temporarily, thereby enhancing vulnerability to conventional military means. Needless to say, the harmful effects of SEB need to be generally attacked, and not only in connection with the military aspect. SEB is a toxic mitogen that triggers a paradoxical response in the infected organism: a vast stimulation of the immune system on one hand side and, on the other hand, a profound immunosuppression that may allow the multiplication of the infecting bacteria, unimpeded by an immune response [Hoffman, Science 248:685 (1990); Smith and Johnson J Immunol 115:575 (1975); Marrack et al, J Exp Med 171:455 (1990); Pinto et al, Transplantation 25:320 (1978)]. During the cellular immune response, a dynamic interplay is induced, by antigens or mitogens, between activation of Thl type cytokine gene expression on one hand, exemplified by interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor-β (TNF-β), and on the other hand, its cell-mediated suppression by CD8 cells and other cell subsets [Ketzinel et al, Scand J Immunol 33:593 (1991); Arad et al, Cell Immunol 160:240 (1995)], and by the inhibitory cytokines from Th2 cells, IL-4 and IL-10 [Mosmann and Coffman. Annu Rev Immunol 7:145 (1989)]. SEB is a member of the family of pyrogenic exotoxins [Herman et al, Ann Rev Immunol 9:745 (1991)] that comprises bacterial exotoxins and Mis proteins. These agents stimulate a 20,000-fold greater proportion of rodent or human T cells than do ordinary antigens. Thus, SEB activates 30-40% of all T cells in some mice to divide and produce cytokines [Marrack and Kappler (1990) ibid.]. Indeed, expression of the toxicity of SEB requires T cells; mice that lack T cells or SEB-reactive T cells are not affected by doses of SEB that cause weight loss and death in normal animals [Marrack et al. (1990) ibid.; Marrack and Kappler (1990) ibid.]. Unlike normal antigens, SEB and related toxic mitogens do not require processing and antigen presentation [Janeway et al, Immunol Rev 107:61 (1989)] but activate the T cell by binding at a specific site in the variable portion of the β chain (N-β) of the T-cell receptor [Choi et al, Nature 346:471 (1990)]. The crucial region for T-cell receptor interaction with toxin lies on the outer face of the N-β domain, a region not involved in conventional antigen recognition [Choi et al, Proc Νatl Acad Sci U.S.A. 86:8941 (1989)]. Simultaneously, pyrogenic exotoxins bind directly to MHC class II molecules [Scholl et al, Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 86:4210 (1989)] and thus affect primarily CD4 + T cells, although CD8 + cells are also activated [Fleischer and Schrezenmeier, J Exp Med 167: 1697 (1988); Fraser, Nature 339:221 (1989); Misfeldt, Infect Immun 58:2409 (1990)]. The current consensus is that pyrogenic exotoxins activate T cells so effectively because they bypass the ordinary interaction of antigen with class II MHC and T-cell receptor [Janeway, Cell 63:659 (1990)]. An alternative view is that pyrogenic exotoxins act as coligands that facilitate and thus greatly exaggerate the effect of minute amounts of ordinary antigens [Janeway (1990) ibid.]. The toxicity of SEB and related exotoxins is thought to be related to the capacity of these molecules to stimulate the rapid and excessive production of cytokines, especially of IL-2, IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factors (TNFs). IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF- β are secreted from activated T helper type 1 (Thl) cells while TNF-α is secreted by Thl cells, monocytes and macrophages. High levels of these cytokines, suddenly produced, have been implicated as a central pathogenic factor in toxin-related toxicity [Schad et al, EMBO J 14:3292 (1995)] and are thought to cause a rapid drop in blood pressure leading to toxic shock. While investigation has produced a plausible explanation for the vast stimulation of T cells by SEs, it is not yet clear why these toxins are also strongly immunosuppressive. They induce a decline in both primary T and B cell responses, including the production of antibodies and the generation of plaque-forming cells [Hoffman (1990) ibid.; Smith and Johnson (1975) ibid.; Marrack et al (1990) ibid.; Pinto et al. (1978) ibid.; Ikejima et al, J Clin Invest 73: 1312 (1984); Poindexter and Schlievert, J Infect Dis 153:772 (1986)]. The sensitivity of humans to staphylococcal toxins exceeds that of mice by a factor of 100. Thus, the toxic shock syndrome toxin 1, TSST-1, another pyrogenic exotoxin from Staphylococcus aureus, stimulates human T cells to express the key cytokines, IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-β at <0.1 pg/ml, while murine cells require approximately 10 pg/ml [Uchiyama et al, J Immunol 143:3173 (1989)]. Mice may have developed relative resistance to toxic mitogens by deleting from their T cell repertoire those cells that display the most highly reactive N-β chains or by eliminating these N-β genes [Marrack and Kappler (1990) ibid.]. Such deletions have not been detected in humans, making them far more vulnerable. The incapacitating and potentially lethal effects for humans of SEB (and of exotoxins of the same family of superantigens), whether exerted on civilians or military personnel, create a need for prophylaxis against SEB, for treatment of SEB- exposed individuals and for a safe SEB vaccine. Despite the urgency of this need, methods of protection or treatment have been lacking. Thus, in -galactosamine-sensitized murine models of SEB intoxication, one based on intramuscular challenge with SEB toxin and the other on intranasal challenge using mucosal SEB exposure, it was possible to protect mice with proteosome-SEB toxoid vaccines in which the SEB toxoid component was prepared by a 30-day formalin treatment of the biologically active, intact SEB protein molecule [Lowell et al. (1996) ibid.]. As detailed below, however, the inventors have now found that antibodies raised against certain peptide domains within the SEB molecule enhance the ability of SEB to stimulate human T cells, rather than protecting them against the toxin. This finding limits the use of SEB toxoids as vaccine, in view of the danger of eliciting certain SEB-sensitizing antibodies that could not only fail to confer protective immunity but would lead to significant exacerbation of the toxic responses in SEB-exposed persons. Other investigators sought recourse in the use of fragments rather than the complete SEB protein molecule, through the synthesis of a series of overlapping SEB peptides, in the order of 30 amino acids each in length [Jett et al, Infect Immun 62:3408 (1994)]. These peptides were used to generate antisera in rabbits whose ability to inhibit the SEB-induced proliferation of a mixture of human T cells and macrophages was then tested. That effort failed to yield an effective or specific inhibitory response. Thus, peptide pSEB(l 13-144), containing amino acids 1 13 to 144 of the SEB protein molecule, as well as peptides covering amino acids 130-160, 151-180, and 171-200 each elicited antisera that inhibited the SEB-induced lymphocyte proliferation weakly, by up to 2.5-fold [Jett et al. (1994) ibid.]. A number of investigators attempted the create peptide vaccines. Thus, Mayordomo et al. [J Exp Med 183:1357 (1996)] used a mutant peptide derived from p53 as vaccine for therapy of murine tumors. Hughes and Gilleland [Vaccine 13: 1750 (1995)] used synthetic peptides representing epitopes of outer membrane protein F of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to afford protection against P. aeruginosa infection in a murine acute pneumonia model. In an attempt to use peptide immunization in humans Brander et al [Clin Exp Immunol 105:18 (1996)] showed that a combined CD8 + /CD4 + T cell-targeted vaccine restimulated the memory CD4 T cell response but failed to induce cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Major sources of exotoxins are, as already mentioned, S. Aureus and S. Pyogenes. The flesh-eating bacteria, S. Pyogenes, produce a family of different toxins with closely similar mode of action: excessive activation of T cells. S. Aureus produces next to SEB as major component, also SEA, SECs, SEE and TSST-1 (toxic shock syndrome toxin 1) and S. Pyogenes produces SPE A as major toxin, as well as other pyrogenic exotoxins. Hence, in staphylococcal food poisonings and, more seriously, in biological warfare or in toxic shock caused by S. pyogenes, mixtures of toxins are encountered. The composition of such mixtures cannot be anticipated with certainty. The worst scenarios of biological warfare entail not the use of a single, purified pyrogenic exotoxin, as favored for immunological studies, but rather a readily attainable, crude natural mixtures of such toxins, as produced, for example, by culturing S. Aureus. Clearly, this complexity demands the development of broad-spectrum antagonists of pyrogenic exotoxins as well as broad-spectrum vaccines. There exists, therefore, a long-felt need to design a SEB vaccine that is free of sensitizing potential, yet is capable of protecting test animals or humans against lethal doses of the toxin. Even greater value would be inherent in a vaccine that can afford protection not only against SEB, but also against a wider spectrum of the SE toxin family, including, for example, SEA. Moreover, currently, there is no prophylaxis available against SEB or any other pyrogenic exotoxin, nor treatment of exposed persons. There exists, therefore, also a long-felt need to design agents that antagonize the action of SEB, as well as any other pyrogenic exotoxin. Such antidotes will have great value, both in the medical treatment of acute food poisoning and in saving lives in cases of toxic shock and related pathological conditions. There exists therefore a need, on the one hand, for an antagonist against pyrogenic exotoxins, for use in immediate treatment, or short term prevention and rapid prophylaxis, of acute toxic shock and of the harmful effects of such toxins which may be due to, for example, accidental food poisoning, and on the other hand, for a vaccine for immunization against intoxication by pyrogenic exotoxins, for long term protection thereagainst. In addition, currently there is no way by which to assess the efficacy of vaccination of humans against pyrogenic toxins, since humans cannot be challenged with the toxin in order to check whether they have been conferred the desired immunity. There exists therefore a need for a clinical test for assessing the efficacy of vaccination of humans against pyrogenic toxins which employs surrogate markers. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to peptides comprising an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino sequence of a fragment of a pyrogenic exotoxin, and derivatives of said peptides, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins. The present invention also relates to peptides comprising an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino sequence of a fragment of a pyrogenic exotoxin, and derivatives of said peptides, capable of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. The peptides of the invention comprise an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino sequence of a fragment of Staphylococcal aureus enterotoxin B (SEB). The pyrogenic exotoxin is a bacterial exotoxin produced by Staphylococcus aureus ox Streptococcus pyogenes. According to the invention, the peptides may be further linked through its N- terminus to a lauryl-cysteine (LC) residue and/or through its C-terminus to a cysteine (C) residue, or to other residue/s suitable for linking said peptide to adjuvant/s for immunization. Further, the peptides may be in the form of a dimer, a multimer or in a constrained conformation, in which the constrained conformation is obtained by internal bridges, short-range cyclizations, extension or other chemical modification. The peptides of the invention are capable of inhibiting expression of pyrogenic toxin-induced mRNA encoded by the IL-2, IFN-γ or TNF-β genes. In addition, the peptides of the invention are capable of eliciting, in the presence of a suitable immunization adjuvant, in immunized individuals, the production of antibodies that block T-cell pyrogenic toxin-mediated activation. In a second aspect of the invention a pharmaceutical composition is provided, for the treatment or short term prophylaxis of toxin-mediated activation of T cells, comprising as active ingredient a therapeutically effective amount of at least one peptide according to the invention or derivative thereof. Additionally, the invention provides a vaccine for conferring long term immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin, comprising as active ingredient an immunologically effective amount of at least one peptide according to the invention, or derivative thereof. Also provided by the invention is a method for the immediate treatment or short term prevention of acute toxic shock and of the harmful effects which may be due to. for example, accidental food poisoning induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin, comprising administering to a patient in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount of the pharmaceutical composition of the invention or of a therapeutically effective amount of at least one peptide of the invention. Additionally, the invention provides a method for conferring long term immunity to toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins, comprising administering to a patient an effective immunizing amount of a vaccine of the invention. In yet a further aspect, the invention relates to an antiserum containing antibodies directed against at least one peptide of the invention, which peptide can elicit the production of the antibodies. The antiserum is capable of alleviating toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin. In addition, the invention provides for a method for assessing the efficacy of a vaccine for conferring immunity against one or more pyrogenic toxins comprising determining the ability of serum from an immunized individual to antagonize toxin- mediated activation of T cells. A kit for assessing the efficacy of a vaccine for conferring immunity against one or more pyrogenic toxins comprising determining the ability of serum from an immunized individual to antagonize toxin-mediated activation of T cells by the method of the invention is also provided. DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES Figure 1 A-1E Induction of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-β Gene Expression by SEB Aliquots of 4x10 6 human PBMC were induced with SEB. Total RNA was extracted at times indicated [T(h)] and serial twofold dilutions (vertical rows) were subjected to dot blot hybridization analysis with 32 P-labeled IL-2 and IFN-γ anti-sense RNA probes; autoradiograms (Figs. IB, 1C) were quantitated by densitometry at 630 nm, plotted in (Fig. 1A). In separate experiments, aliquots of 3xl0 7 human PBMC were induced with SEB and total RNA was extracted at times indicated. IL-2, IFN-γ (Fig. ID) and TNF- β mRNA (Fig. IE) was quantitated by RNase protection analysis. IL-2 mRNA protects a fragment of 1 17 nt; IFN-γ mRNA protects a fragment of 183 nt; TNF-β mRNA protects 2 fragments of 274 and 263 nt. β-Actin RNA served as loading control. Figure 2 Secondary structure domains within the SEB protein molecule The two structural domains of the molecule are seen clearly. Cylinders and arrows represent α-helices and β-strands, respectively. The residues forming the secondary structural elements are: 13-17 (αl), 21-29 {al), 33-39 (βl), 48-52 (β2), 63- 68 (β3), 70-78 (α3), 81-89 (β4), 1 12-120 (β5), 127-138 (β6), 141-151 (β7), 154-156 (β8), 157-172 (α4), 182-190 (β9), 195- 200 (βlO), 210-217 (α5), 222-224 (βll), and 229-236 (βl2). Black domain covers pSEB(l 50-161) and 12(150-161) (see Table 1). Adapted from Swaminathan et al. [Swaminathan et al, Nature 359:801 (1992)]. Figure 3 Lack of SEB agonist activity of SEB-derived peptides Aliquots of 4x10 6 PBMC were induced without inducer (-SEB), with SEB (+SEB), or with 1 μg/ml of one of the indicated SEB- related peptides (Table 1) as sole inducer. Total RNA was extracted after 4 h of induction and serial twofold dilutions were subjected to dot blot hybridization analysis with 32 P-labeled IL-2 and IFN-γ anti-sense RNA probes. Autoradiograms were subjected to microdensitometry at 630 nm; A 630 is plotted. Figure 4 A-4B Antagonist activity of SEB-related peptides Aliquots of 4x10 6 PBMC were induced without inducer (-SEB), with SEB in the presence of no peptide (NP), or with SEB in the presence of 1 μg/ml of one of the indicated SEB-related peptides (sequences: Table 1). Total RNA was extracted after 4 hrs of induction and serial twofold dilutions (vertical rows) were subjected to dot blot hybridization analysis with 32 P-labeled IL-2 and IFN-γ anti-sense RNA probes. Autoradiograms shown were quantitated by densitometry at 630 nm, plotted in (Fig. 4A). Fold inhibition (f.i.) of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA expression induced by SEB (Fig. 4B) was calculated from data as shown in (Fig. 4A), by subtracting basal levels of mRNA expressed (-SEB) and dividing extent of mRNA expression induced by SEB alone (NP) by that obtained with SEB in the presence of the indicated SEB- related peptide. Figure 5 Inhibition of SEB-mediated induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA by pi 2(150-161) Aliquots of 3x10 7 PBMC were induced with SEB, SEB-related peptides as indicated, or both. At times shown, total RNA was extracted and subjected to RNase protection analysis, using a 32 P-labeled IL-2 or IFN-γ antisense RNA probe as for Fig. ID. Autoradiograms are shown. Data for IL-2 and IFN-γ are derived from separate experiments. Figure 6 Inhibition of SEB-mediated induction of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-β mRNA bypl2(150-161) Aliquots of 3xl0 7 PBMC were induced with SEB, in the presence of no peptide (NP) or of SEB-related peptides as indicated. At times shown, total RNA was extracted and subjected to RNase protection analysis, using a 32 P-labeled IL-2, IFN-γ or TNF-β antisense RNA probe as for Figs. ID and IE. rRNA served as loading control. Autoradiograms are shown. Figure 7A-7B SEB antagonist activity of pl2(l 50-161) monomer, dimer and trimer (Fig. 7 A) Aliquots of 4x10 6 PBMC were induced with 100 ng/ml of SEB alone (o), or with SEB in the presence of pi 2(150-161) monomer (•), dimer (■) or trimer (A); molar excess of each peptide over SEB was 420-fold. (Fig. 7B) Dose response to dimer in the same experiment. Dimer was used at a concentration as in (Fig. 7 A) (■) or diluted 1 :10 (■) or 1 :100 (■). At times indicated [T(h)], total RNA was extracted and serial twofold dilutions were subjected to dot blot hybridization analysis with 32 P-labeled IFN-γ antisense RNA probe. Autoradiograms were subjected to micro-densitometry at 630 nm; A 630 is plotted. Figure 8A-8D SEB antagonist activity of Cys-pl2(l 50-161) Aliquots of 4xl0 6 PBMC were induced with 100 ng/ml of SEB alone (o), or with SEB in the presence of undiluted peptide (A) (in 420-fold molar excess over SEB), or of peptide diluted 1 :10 (•) or 1 : 100 (■). In Figs. 8A and 8C, pi 2(150-161) was used. In Figs. 8B and 8D, Cys-pl2(l 50-161) was used, which is pl2(l50- 161) carrying a Cys residue at both N- and C- termini. At times indicated [T(h)], total RNA was extracted and serial twofold dilutions were subjected to dot blot hybridization analysis with 32 p_i aD eled IL-2 (Figs. 8 A and 8B), or IFN-γ (Figs. 8C and 8D) antisense RNA probe. Autoradiograms were subjected to micro- densitometry at 630 nm; A 630 is plotted. Figure 9 Lack of antagonist activity ofpSEB(150-161)for TSST-1 Aliquots of 3xl0 7 PBMC were induced with SEB or TSST-1 as shown, in the presence of no peptide (NP) or of 1 μg/ml of pSEB(41-61) or pSEB(150-161) as indicated. At times shown (h), total RNA was extracted and subjected to RNase protection analysis, using a 32 P-labeled IL-2 antisense RNA probe as for Fig. ID. Figure 10A-10D Lack of antagonist activity of pi 2(150- 161) for SEA Aliquots of 4x10 6 human PBMC were induced with SEB (Figs. 10A, 10B) or SEA (Figs. 10C, 10D), in the absence (o, Δ) or presence (•, A) of 1 μg/ml of peptide pl2(150-161). Total RNA was extracted at times [T(h)] indicated and serial twofold dilutions were subjected to dot blot hybridization analysis with 32 P-labeled IL-2 (Figs. 10A, 10C) and IFN-γ (Figs. 10B, 10D) anti-sense RNA probes. Autoradiograms were quantitated by densitometry at 630 nm. Figure 11 Toxin antagonist activity of pl2(150-161) dimer and D-Ala forms: SEB and TSST-1 Aliquots of 3xl0 7 PBMC were induced with SEB or TSST-1 as indicated, in the presence of no peptide (NP) or of 10 μg/ml of pl2(150-161) or, where indicated, an equal molar concentration of pl2(150-161) dimer (dimer) or of pl2(150-161) carrying a D- Ala residue at both N- and C-termini (Z)-Ala). At times shown, total RNA was extracted and subjected to RNase protection analysis, using 32 P-labeled IL-2 and IFN-γ antisense RNA probes as for Figure ID. rRNA served as loading control. Figure 12 Toxin antagonist activity of pl2(150-161) dimer and D-Ala forms: SEB, TSST-1 and SEA Aliquots of 3xl0 7 PBMC were induced with SEB, TSST-1 or SEA as indicated, in the presence of no peptide (NP), pi 2(150- 161) dimer (dimer) or p!2(150-161) carrying a TJ-Ala residue at both N- and C-termini (Z)-Ala) as indicated, each of the latter at a molar concentration equivalent to 10 μg/ml of pl2(150-161). At times shown, total RNA was extracted and subjected to RNase protection analysis, using 32 P-labeled IL-2 antisense RNA probe as for Fig. ID. rRNA served as loading control. Figure 13A-13B Effect of anti-SEB peptide sera on induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA by SEB Aliquots of 4x10 6 PBMC were induced with SEB (control, C) (•). Rabbit sera against SEB peptides pl2LC(150-161) (A), pSEBLC(13-33) (o), pSEB(81-93) (Q ) or pSEB(41-61) (■) in 1 : 100 dilution were included from the onset of induction. At times [T(h)] indicated, total RNA was extracted and serial twofold dilutions (vertical rows) were subjected to dot blot hybridization analysis with 32 P-labeled IL-2 (Fig. 13 A) and IFN- γ (Fig. 13B) anti-sense RNA probes. Only autoradiograms for IL-2 are shown. Autoradiograms were quantitated by densitometry at 630 nm (Figs. 13 A, 13B). Figure 14A-14B Effect of anti-SEB peptide sera on induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA by SEA Aliquots of 4x10 6 PBMC were induced with SEA (control, C). Where shown, rabbit sera against SEB peptides pl2LC(150-161), pSEBLC(13-33), pSEB(81-93) or pSEB(41-61) in 1 :100 dilution were included from the onset of induction. At 6 hrs (Fig. 14A) and 20 hrs (Fig. 14B), total RNA was extracted and serial twofold dilutions (vertical rows) were subjected to dot blot hybridization analysis with 32 P-labeled IL-2 (Fig. 14 A) and IFN- γ (Fig. 14B) anti-sense RNA probes; autoradiograms shown were quantitated by densitometry at 630 nm. Figure 15 Effect of anti-SEB peptide sera on induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA by TSST-1 Aliquots of 3x10 7 PBMC were induced with 100 ng/ml of TSST- 1 (control, (C)). Where shown, rabbit sera against SEB peptides pl2LC(l 50-161) or pSEBLC(13-33) in 1 : 10 4 dilution were included from the onset of induction. At times shown, total RNA was extracted and subjected to RNase protection analysis, using 32 P-labeled IL-2 and IFN-γ antisense RNA probes as for Figure ID. rRNA served as loading control. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In search for efficient agents for long and short term treatment and prophylaxis of toxic shock induced by pyrogenic exotoxins, a series of short peptides related to certain domains within the SEB protein molecule has been designed. The biological properties of different synthetic SEB-related peptides were then evaluated by the following several criteria: 1. Lack of SEB agonist activity, assayed by the ability to induce in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from normal human blood donors (PBMC) the expression of mRNA encoded by the IL-2 and IFN-γ genes, in the absence of any other inducing agent; 2. pyrogenic exotoxin antagonist activity, assayed by the ability to inhibit, in PBMC, the expression of mRNA encoded by the IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-β genes induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin such as SEB; 3. Immunogenicity, assayed by the ability of a peptide to elicit, in immunized rabbits, the production of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies that bind SEB; 4. Immunogenicity, assayed by the ability of a peptide to elicit, in immunized rabbits, the production of antibodies that block the harmful action of pyrogenic exotoxins, such as SEB on the human cellular immune response, monitored by the ability of rabbit serum raised against a peptide to inhibit, in PBMC, the induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA by SEB or by other pyrogenic exotoxins such as TSST-1 or the more related toxin, SEA; 5. Activity of a vaccine, such as anti-SEB vaccine, assayed by the ability of a peptide to protect immunized animals, in the D-galactosamine mouse model, against lethal doses of SEB whether administered via the intramuscular or intranasal route. The inventors have indeed obtained peptides that meet each of these five criteria. In a specific embodiment of the invention, a SEB-related dodecapeptide antagonist was designed. This peptide blocks the action of SEB as well as other pyrogenic exotoxins on the human immune response in vitro, severely inhibiting SEB- mediated induction of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-β mRNA. It is clear that this peptide could be used for treatment of acute toxic shock and of harmful effects which may be due to, for example, accidental food poisoning induced by pyrogenic exotoxins. In addition, this peptide elicits antibodies that protect human lymphoid cells against SEB, SEA, and TSST-1, indicating that it may confer wider protective immunity against pyrogenic toxins. However, antibodies raised against peptides derived from certain other SEB protein domains actually enhanced the response of human PBMC to SEB and SEA, as expressed by greater induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA, rather than protecting against the toxins. Immunization of mice with the SEB antagonist peptide elicited protection against lethal doses of SEB, resulting in survival of test animals. It is clear that the peptide may also be used for conferring long-term immunity against toxic shock induced by pyrogenic exotoxins. Thus, in a first aspect, the present invention relates to peptides comprising an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino sequence of a fragment of a pyrogenic exotoxin, and to functional derivatives of such peptides, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by the exotoxins. The terms derivatives and functional derivatives used herein mean peptides with any insertions, deletions, substitutions and modifications that are capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by the exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells (hereafter referred to as "derivative/s"). In a second aspect the invention relates to peptides comprising an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino sequence of a fragment of a pyrogenic exotoxin, and to derivatives of such peptides, capable of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. The pyrogenic exotoxin is usually a bacterial exotoxin, specifically an exotoxin produced by Staphylococcus aureus or by Streptococcus pyogenes. In a preferred embodiment of both said aspects of the invention, the invention relates to a peptide comprising an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino sequence of a fragment of Staphylococcal aureus enterotoxin B (SEB). In a specifically preferred embodiment the invention relates to peptides comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:l (positions 150 to 161 of the sequence of the naturally occurring SEB protein shown in SEQ ID NO:12), and functional derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin- mediated activation of T cells. These peptides can therefore be used for both immediate treatment of acute toxic shock and of the harmful effects which may be due to, for example, accidental food poisoning, induced by the pyrogenic exotoxins and for conferring long-term immunity against such toxic shock. A particular example may be a peptide having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NOT (hereafter also referred to as pSEB(150-161)) and functional derivatives thereof. This peptide is capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. In an alternative embodiment the invention relates to peptides comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:2 and to derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. Also these peptides can be used for both immediate treatment of acute toxic shock and of the harmful effects which may be due to, for example, accidental food poisoning induced by the pyrogenic exotoxins and for conferring long-term immunity against such toxic shock. A particular example may be a peptide having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:2 (hereinafter also referred to as pl2(150-161)) and derivatives thereof capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. In a further embodiment the invention relates to peptides comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:3 (positions 152 to 161 of the sequence of the naturally occurring protein shown in SEQ ID NO: 12) and to functional derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. Also these peptides can be used for both immediate treatment of acute toxic shock and of the harmful effects which may be due to, for example, accidental food poisoning induced by the pyrogenic exotoxins and for conferring long-term immunity against such toxic shock. Particular examples may be a peptide having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:3 (hereinafter also referred to as pSEB(152-161)) and derivatives thereof capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. In addition, the invention relates to peptides comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO :4 and to functional derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. Also these peptides can be used for both immediate treatment of acute toxic shock and of the harmful effects which may be due to, for example, accidental food poisoning induced by the pyrogenic exotoxins and for conferring long-term immunity against such toxic shock. A particular example may be a peptide having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO :4 (hereinafter also referred to as pi 0(152-161)) and functional derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. As mentioned, pSEB(150-161) corresponds to the natural amino acid sequence in SEB between positions 150-161, while pl2(150-161) differs from the corresponding natural amino acid sequence of SEB in 3 out of the 12 positions, yet possesses even greater toxin antagonist activity. It is thus possible to design a pyrogenic exotoxin antagonist and/or vaccine through use of short peptides related, but not necessarily identical to, domains within the SEB toxin molecule. The lack of structure of linear peptides on one hand renders them vulnerable to proteases in human serum and on the other hand acts to reduce their affinity for target sites, because only few of the possible conformations may be active. Therefore, it is desirable to optimize antagonist peptide structure. Thus, the peptides of the invention can be coupled through their N-terminus to a lauryl-cysteine (LC) residue and/or through their C-terminus to a cysteine (C) residue, or to other residue/s suitable for linking the peptide to adjuvant/s for immunization, as will be described in more detail hereafter. Accordingly, in a further embodiment, the invention relates to a peptide having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 5 (hereinafter also referred to as pSEBLC(150-161)) and functional derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. These peptides can also be used for both immediate treatment of acute toxic shock and of the harmful effects which may be due to, for example, accidental food poisoning induced by the pyrogenic exotoxins and for conferring long-term immunity against such toxic shock. In yet another embodiment, the invention relates to a peptide having the following amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:6 (hereinafter also referred to as pl2LC(150-161)) and functional derivatives thereof capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. Evidently, such peptides can also be used for both immediate treatment of acute toxic shock and of the harmful effects which may be due to, for example, accidental food poisoning induced by the pyrogenic exotoxins and for conferring long-term immunity against such toxic shock. The peptides of the invention, as well as the derivatives thereof may all be positively charged, negatively charged or neutral and may be in the form of a dimer, a multimer or in a constrained conformation. A constrained conformation can be attained by internal bridges, short-range cyclizations, extension or other chemical modification. Peptides in the form of a dimer or trimer can have, for example, the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID NOs. 7 and 8, respectively (hereinafter also referred to as Dimer and Trimer, receptively) and functional derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. As with other peptides of the invention, these peptides can also be used for both immediate treatment of acute toxic shock and of the harmful effects caused thereby and for conferring long- term immunity against such toxic shock. Further, the peptides of the invention may be extended at the N-terminus and/or C- terminus thereof with various identical or different amino acid residues. As an example for such extension, the peptide may be extended at the N-terminus and/or C-terminus thereof with identical or different hydrophobic amino acid residue/s which may be naturally occurring or synthetic amino acid residue/s. A preferred synthetic amino acid residue is E ) -alanine. A particular example for a peptide extended with synthetic amino acid residues is the peptide having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 10 (hereinafter also referred to as -Ala) and functional derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. An additional example for such an extension is provided by peptides extended both at the N-terminus and/or C-terminus thereof with a cysteine residue. Naturally, such an extension may lead to a constrained conformation due to Cys-Cys cyclization resulting from the formation of a disulfide bond. A particular such peptide has the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 9 (hereinafter also referred to as Cys- pi 2(150- 162)) and functional derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. According to one embodiment of the invention, the Cys-pl2(150-162)) is a cyclic peptide having a disulfide bond via the terminal cysteine residues. Nevertheless, the Cys-pl2(150-162) peptide may be linear. In addition the peptide may be extended aromatic amino acid residue/s, which may be naturally occurring or synthetic amino acid residue/s. A preferred aromatic amino acid residue is tryptophan. Alternatively, the peptides can be extended at the N- terminus and/or C-terminus thereof with amino acids present in corresponding positions of the amino acid sequence of the naturally occurring pyrogenic exotoxin. Nonetheless, according to the invention, the peptides of the invention may be extended at the N-terminus and/or C-terminus thereof with various identical or different organic moieties which are not a naturally occurring or synthetic amino acids. As an example for such extension, the peptide may be extended at the Ν- terminus and/or C-terminus thereof with an N-acetyl group. A particular example for such an extension is the peptide having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID ΝOT 1 (hereinafter also referred to as Ac-pl2(150-161)) and functional derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. These extended peptides, as other peptides of the invention, can also be used for both immediate treatment of acute toxic shock and of the harmful effects caused thereby and for conferring long-term immunity against such toxic shock. The peptides of the invention are capable of inhibiting expression of pyrogenic toxin-induced mRNA encoded by the IL-2, IFN-γ or TNF-β genes, as will be shown in the following Examples. In addition, the peptides of the invention are capable of eliciting the production of antibodies that block T-cell activation in immunized individuals. The production of antibodies will be enhanced in the presence of a suitable immunization adjuvant. Preferred adjuvants may be keyhole lympet hemocyanin (KLH), proteosomes or alum. As will be shown in the Examples, peptide pl2(150-161) and the specific derivatives thereof, i.e. the Dimer form, the Cys form (Cys-pl2(150-161)) and D- Ala form exhibit antagonist activity against SEB as well as against other pyrogenic exotoxins. The amino acid sequence of these synthetic peptides having the sequence shown in SEQ ID NOs.:2, 7, 9 and 10, differ in several positions from the corresponding sequence in SEB, T N K K K V T A Q E L D. found in peptide pSEB(150-161). The K K K and Q E L D motifs, features shared by peptides pl2(150-161) (and its derivatives) and pSEB(150-161), are spaced equally in both and may be important for antagonist activity, with the triple-lysine motif K K K conferring 3 positive charges. Residues T150, K152, E159 and D161 of this SEB domain are conserved among all staphylococcal enterotoxins [Swaminathan et al. (1992) ibid.]. Indeed, the 150-161 domain of SEB is highly conserved among pyrogenic toxins in general, with 10/12 identities for SEA, SEC1, SEC2, and S. pyogenes exotoxin A (SPE A) and 9/12 for SEE [Bohach and Schlievert, Mol Genet 209:5 (1987); Couch et al, J Bacteriol 170:2954 (1988); Bohach and Schlievert, Infect Immun 57:2249 (1989)]. All of these toxins contain the residues underlined above, including the first 2 lysine residues (K K) and the Q E L D [Swaminathan et al (1992) ibid.; Bohach and Schlievert (1987) ibid.; Couch et al. (1988) ibid.; Bohach and Schlievert (1989) ibid.]. The superantigen, pep M5 protein, also contains a region with limited homology (<50%) to pSEB( 150-161) located near its C-terminus [Wang et α/., J Immunol 151:1419 (1993)]. Conservation of SEB domains among the pyrogenic toxin family is, however, not unique for amino acids 150-161. SEB domains covering amino acids 76-86, 1 13- 124, 151-168 and 213-226 all show extensive conservation within this family [Hoffmann et al, Infect Immun 62:3396 (1994)]. Moreover, the relevance of the conservation of the above-mentioned motifs corresponding to part of the sequence in pSEB(150-161) is not clear, since this region does not contribute to mitogenicity [Wang et al. (1993) ibid.]. In a further aspect, the invention relates to pharmaceutical compositions for the treatment or prophylaxis of toxin-mediated activation of T cells, comprising as active ingredient a therapeutically effective amount of at least one peptide according to the invention or derivative thereof. As described above, the peptides comprise an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino acid sequence of a fragment SEB. The term toxin-mediated activation as used throughout this application can mean activation of T cells mediated by a single pyrogenic exotoxin or a mixture of such toxins. The pharmaceutically 'effective amount' for purposes herein is that determined by such considerations as are known in the art. The amount must be sufficient to antagonize toxin-mediated activation of T cells. The pharmaceutical composition of the invention can be prepared in dosage units forms and may be prepared by any of the methods well-known in the art of pharmacy. In addition, the pharmaceutical compositions of the invention may further comprise pharmaceutically acceptable additives such as pharmaceutical acceptable carrier, excipient or stabilizer, and optionally other therapeutic constituents. Naturally, the acceptable carriers, excipients or stabilizers are non- toxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed. The magnitude of therapeutic dose of the composition of the invention will of course vary with the group of patients (age, sex, etc.), the nature of the condition to be treated and with the route administration and will be determined by the attending physician. In yet a further embodiment, the invention relates to vaccines for conferring immunity against toxic shock induced by pyrogenic exotoxins, comprising as active ingredient an immunologically effective amount of at least one peptide according to the invention or derivatives thereof and may contain mixtures of such peptides and derivatives. By the term 'immunologically effective amount' is meant any amount sufficient to enhance the production of antibodies that block T cell activation induced by pyrogenic exotoxins, and confer immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins. The vaccines of the invention may optionally further comprise suitable immunization adjuvants or mixtures thereof. Suitable adjuvants may be proteosomes, KLH and alum, as well as combinations of proteosomes with alum and of KLH with alum. As will be shown in the following Examples, the vaccines according to the invention are capable of enhancing production of antibodies that block T-cell activation induced by pyrogenic exotoxins. Efforts to develop antidotes for use against toxic shock symptoms have concentrated on blocking downstream phenomena in the toxicity cascade, mainly by inhibiting the action of TNF with monoclonal antibodies or soluble receptors. The high levels of cytokines produced in response to toxins render this approach ineffective. The present Invention shows that it is possible to block the action of a pyrogenic exotoxin by an altogether different strategy, using antagonists that inhibit toxin action at the top of the toxicity cascade, before activation of T cells takes place. The Examples describe in detail molecular methods, analysis of pyrogenic exotoxin- mediated activation of the human cellular immune response through expression of IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-β genes in PBMC, to evaluate toxin antagonist activity. Studies in human PBMC were combined with animal tests to evaluate immunogenic properties and vaccine efficacy and it will be shown that these methods are applicable in devising agents that counteract or protect human PBMC also against other members of the family of pyrogenic exotoxins. Because humans are far more sensitive to pyrogenic exotoxins than mice, while primate models poses other limitations such as cost, there is a need for a human in vitro system, capable of analyzing the mechanisms of toxin-mediated activation and suppression of the immune response. The present invention provides such a system, which offers major advantages: a) The experimental system employs freshly prepared human lymphoid cell populations that preserve cell-cell interactions involved in regulation of cytokine production and are as close as possible to the peripheral immune system of the body; b) Early events of the immune response can be analyzed precisely and directly by following the transient and highly regulated expression of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-β mRNA; c) Expression of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-β genes is exquisitely sensitive to activation elicited by SEB; d) This molecular approach is far more direct and specific than measurement of biological responses, such as cell proliferation or antibody production, that are the cumulative result of a sequence of events; e) The approach presented offers a tool for mapping functional domains in SEB essential for activation of human IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-β genes, and can serve to facilitate both antagonist and vaccine development. Thus, the invention also relates to a method for treating toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins. The method comprises administering to a patient in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount of the pharmaceutical composition of the invention or a therapeutically effective amount of at least one peptide of the invention, or functional derivative thereof. In a further embodiment there is provided a method for preventing toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins comprising administering to a patient in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount of a composition of the invention or of a therapeutically effective amount of at least one peptide of the invention or functional derivative thereof. The invention also relates to a method for immunizing a patient against toxic shock induced by pyrogenic exotoxin, comprising administering to a patient an effective immunizing amount of the vaccine of the invention or of at least one peptide of the invention or functional derivative thereof. The magnitude of therapeutic dose of the peptide or of the vaccine of the invention will of course vary with the group of patients (age, sex etc.), the nature of the condition to be treated and with the route administration and will be determined by the attending physician. The peptides and the vaccines of the invention can be administered and dosed in accordance with good medical practice. In particular, the immunization method of the invention comprises a single administration of the peptides or vaccines of the invention. Administration may be carried out in various ways, including intravenous, intramuscular or subcutaneuos injection. However, other methods of administration such as intranasal administration are also possible. As shown hereafter, antibodies raised against peptides derived from certain SEB protein domains actually enhance the response of human PBMC to SEB and SEA, as expressed by induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA, rather than protect against these toxins. This would provide a tool for detecting such potential exacerbation by any pyrogenic exotoxin vaccine even before trials with humans are conducted. Design of pyrogenic exotoxin antagonist peptides as described herein may find novel applications not only in hitherto neglected areas, prophylaxis against pyrogenic exotoxins and treatment of toxin-exposed individuals but also may facilitate the development of a safer pyrogenic exotoxin vaccine. A defined peptide vaccine, free of exacerbating properties, would be superior to a toxoid vaccine. Thus, the invention also relates to antisera containing antibodies directed against peptides of the invention. For example, peptides such as pSEBLC(l 50-161) or pl2LC(l 50-161) can be linked through the lauryl cysteine residue to proteosomes. Alternatively, peptides such as those coupled through their C-terminus to a cysteine (C) residue, as described above, can be linked through the cysteine residue to KLH. KLH and proteosomes are known adjuvants for immunization and the peptides so linked are capable of eliciting the production of antibodies. It is also known in the art that aluminum hydroxide (alum) may be used as an immunization adjuvant directly, with non-linked peptides, or after linking a peptide to proteosomes or to KLH [Lowell et al, (1996) ibid. ] or other suitable adjuvants. Therefore, the invention also relates to antisera containing antibodies directed against peptides of the invention, or functional derivatives thereof. The antisera of the invention are capable of alleviating toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin. An antiserum according to the invention can be a domestic animal antiserum, for example rabbit, sheep, bovine, equine, porcine or goat antiserum. For some purposes, for example the in vitro use mentioned above, human sera from immunized individuals can be used. As already mentioned above, at present there exists no tool for assessing the efficacy of a vaccine against pyrogenic toxins in conferring immunity thereagainst. The present invention provides for such a method and thus, in a further aspect the invention relates to a method for assessing the efficacy of a vaccine for conferring immunity against one or more pyrogenic toxins comprising determining the ability of serum from an immunized individual to antagonize toxin-mediated activation of T cells. The ability of serum from an immunized individual to antagonize toxin-mediated activation of T cells can be determined by measuring the inhibition of expression of pyrogenic toxin-induced mRNA encoded by the IL-2, IFN-γ, or TNF-β genes. Reference may be made to Example 7 and Fig. 13 to 15. A kit for assessing the efficacy of a vaccine for conferring immunity against one or more pyrogenic toxins comprising determining the ability of serum from an immunized individual to antagonize toxin-mediated activation of T cells by the method of the invention is also provided. EXAMPLES Cell culture and induction of human cytokine gene expression PBMC from healthy human donors were separated on Ficoll Paque (Pharmacia), washed twice with 50 ml of RPMI 1640 medium, resuspended at a density of 4xl0 6 /ml and cultured in this medium supplemented with 2% fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, 10 mM MEM nonspecific amino acids, 100 mM Na-pyruvate, lO mM Hepes pH 7.2, 5xl0 -5 M 2-mercapto-ethanol, lOO u/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 5 μg/ml nystatin. SEB (lot 14-30, from the Department of Toxinology, U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases), SEA or TSST- 1 (Sigma) were added to 100 ng/ml. RNase protection analysis Total RNA was extracted with guanidinium isothiocyanate [Chomczynski and Sacchi, Anal Biochem 162: 156 (1987)]. RNase protection analysis was done [Arad et al (1995) ibid.] using genomic antisense RNA probes transcribed with [α- 2 P]UTP in vitro from DNA inserted into pBS (Promega). The IL-2 probe (600 nucleotides (nt)), transcribed from the T7 promoter, is complementary to the third exon and a portion of the third intron of the IL-2 gene; in 8 M urea-polyacrylamide gels, it yields an RNA fragment of 117 nt protected by IL-2 mRNA. The IFN-γ probe (274 nt), transcribed from the T3 promoter, is complementary to the third exon and a portion of the third intron of the IFN-γ gene and yields an RNA fragment of 183 nt protected by IFN-γ mRNA. The TNF-β probe (700 nt), transcribed from the T3 promoter, is complementary to part of exon 1, exon 2, exon 3, and portions of intron 3 and exon 4; TNF-β mRNA protects 2 fragments of 274 and 263 nt. Sense RNA transcripts yielded no detectable signal upon hybridization. Antisense RNA probes for 18S rRNA (protecting 90 nt) or β-actin (protecting 415 nt) served as loading controls. Quantitative dot blot hybridization of IL-2 and IFN-γ RNA PBMC from 1-ml cultures were collected and lysed in 7.5 M guanidinium-HCl. RNA, precipitated overnight in ethanol at -20°C, was dissolved into formaldehyde and incubated for 15 min at 60°C. Four serial 2-fold dilutions, made in 10x saline sodium citrate, were applied in duplicate to nitrocellulose sheets, using a 96-well dot blot apparatus. After baking in a vacuum oven at 80 °C, sheets were hybridized separately with 32p_ι a beled antisense RNA probes for human IL-2 and IFN-γ, respectively. Exposed autoradiograms were scanned at 630 nm in an ELISA reader. RNA levels are expressed in units of Ag Q. Serial twofold dilutions of a given RNA sample yield a linear optical density response over a 200-fold range of intensities of gene expression that is proportional to the concentration of specific RNA present in each sample [Arad et al. (1995) ibid.; Gerez et al, Clin Immunol Immunopathol 58:251 (1991); Kaempfer et al. , J Clin Oncol 14: 1778 (1996)]. Synthesis of SEB-related peptides Peptides were synthesized in the Peptide Synthesis Unit of The Hebrew University- Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem. tBOC chemistry (tertiary butoxycarbonyl protection of amino termini) was used to prepare one batch of peptides, used for Figs. 3-5, Table 2, and trials 2 and 3 in Table 3; peptides were cleaved, and the side chain deprotected, with fluoric acid and then solubilized with 10% dimethyl- sulfoxide, The same amount of dimethylsulfoxide was added to control cell cultures. Fluoronylmethoxycarbonyl (FMOC) chemistry was used to prepare a second batch of peptides, used for Figs. 6 and 7 and trial 1 in Table 3; peptides were cleaved, and the side chain deprotected, with triflouroacetic acid. Triflouroacetic acid-peptide salts were soluble in culture medium. In the experiment of Fig. 6, corresponding peptides from both batches were also compared and found to have equal antagonist activity. N-terminal laurylcysteine (LC-) and C-terminal cysteine (-C) were added under the same conditions used for the other amino acids. Peptides were >95% purity by HPLC. Proteosome or KLH coupling of peptides Outer membrane proteosome preparations were stored at -70°C after purification, as described [Mallett et al, Infect Immun 63:2382 [1995)], from group B type 2 Neisseria meningitidis by extraction of a paste of phenol-killed bacteria with a solution of 6% Empigen BB (Albright and Wilson, Whitehaven, Cumbria, UK) in 1 M calcium chloride, followed by precipitation with ethanol, solubilization in Tris- buffered saline with EDTA and 1% Empigen BB, reprecipitation with ammonium sulfate, and then resolubilization in the Tris buffer with 1% Empigen BB [Lowell et al. (1996) ibid.]. LC-peptides were coupled to proteosomes as described by Lowell et al [Lowell et al. (1996) ibid.]. Maleimide-activated keyhole lympet hemocyanin (KLH) was coupled to C-terminal C residues following instructions of the supplier (Pierce). Immunization Rabbits were immunized intramuscularly with 100 μg of proteosome- or KLH- coupled peptides, at 0 and 3 weeks. Three bleeds were performed; data for the third bleed are shown in Table 2. BALB/c mice were immunized with 50-100 μg of proteosome- or KLH-coupled peptides, via the parenteral (intra-muscular) or intranasal routes as described by Lowell et al [Lowell et al. (1996) ibid. ]. Blood was collected periodically from rabbits from the ear vein, and from mice from the retroorbital plexus at 3 weeks before challenge with SEB. SEB-specific IgG was assayed by ELISA as [Lowell et al. (1996) ibid.]. SEB challenge assays of vaccine efficacy in vivo Lot 14-30 SEB was used for challenge. For parenteral (IM) or intranasal (IN) challenge, Z)-galactosamine sensitization was used in conjunction with SEB, as described [Lowell et al (1996)]. Example 1 Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) are used to provide a quantitative measure of the primary response of human T cells to an exotoxin, through expression of the Thl type cytokine genes encoding IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-β. Gene expression is analyzed within hours after stimulation, providing a more direct and immediate measure of the action of SEB than cell proliferation which results from a complex series of events. Induction of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-β gene expression by SEB Exposure of PBMC to SEB leads to induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA, shown by quantitative dot blot hybridization (Fig. 1A-1C) and RNase protection analysis with a genomic antisense RNA probe (Fig. ID). Both methods yield similar patterns of induction, characterized by a transient wave of IL-2 mRNA and more prolonged expression of IFN-γ mRNA. TNF-β mRNA was induced more gradually (Fig. IE). Patterns of mRNA have thus been documented to reflect the expression of the active proteins. Example 2 Design of SEB-Related Peptides Fourteen peptides representing particular SEB domains were synthesized (Table 1 ; peptides were >95% purity by HPLC) and assayed for the ability to block SEB- mediated induction of IL-2, IFN-γ or TNF-β gene expression. Identification of such a peptide could be useful for developing a peptide vaccine against SEB and more directly, for preventing the harmful effects of SEB on the immune response. Multiple, widely separated regions within SEB interact with the TCR on one hand and with the MHC class II molecule on the other [Swaminathan et al. (1992) ibid. ; Jardetzky et al, Nature 368:711 (1994)]. Domains chosen consist of amino acid residues 13-33, 41-61, 81-93 and 208-218, essential for binding to TCR and MHC class II; residues 21-29 and 48-61, essential for binding to the TCR; and residues 13-17 and 44-52, essential for binding to MHC class II [Swaminathan et al (1992) ibid.]. A 12-amino acid SEB domain, made up of residues 150-161, is thought not to be involved in binding to TCR or MHC class II but forms a central turn starting within β-strand 7 and connecting it, via short β-strand 8, to α-helix 4 (Table 1 and Fig. 2). These sequences are found in the SEB molecule, except for two variants of that domain devised by the inventors: dodecamer pl2(150-161) and decamer pl0(152-161) (150-161* and 152-161 * in Table 1, respectively). To allow study of their immunogenicity and ability to elicit protective immunity against SEB, many of the peptides were synthesized also with an extra lauryl- cysteine residue at their N-terminus (LC-) or with an extra cysteine residue at their C-terminus (-C), as indicated in Table 1. Example 3 Lack of SEB agonist activity of SEB-derived peptides SEB agonist activity of peptides was examined by the ability to induce expression of IL-2 and IFN-γ genes. Even when present in 200-fold higher molar amounts than SEB, no peptide exhibited significant SEB agonist activity, defined as >2-fold increase in RNA over basal level (Fig. 3). When induction of mRNA for IL-2 (Fig. 5) or IFN-γ (not shown) was analyzed by RNase protection, pSEB(41-61), pi 2(150- 161) and pSEB( 150-161) again failed to show SEB agonist activity. Example 4 Peptide pl2(150-161) is an SEB antagonist Antagonist activity of SEB-related peptides was defined by the ability to block SEB-mediated induction of IL-2, IFN-γ, and/or TNF-β gene expression in PBMC. A short, unstructured peptide would be expected to compete poorly with intact SEB whose binding is stabilized by multiple interactions with the TCR and MHC class II molecule [Swaminathan et al. (1992) ibid.; Jardetzky et al. (1994) ibid.]. However, an appropriate SEB-related peptide might compete with SEB for one of its cognate sites, preventing thereby a cooperative interaction with multiple sites. Ability to antagonize induction of IL-2 or IFN-γ gene expression was assayed by exposing PBMC populations to SEB in the presence of a 100- to 200-fold molar excess of an individual peptide. The resulting hybridization patterns for IL-2 and IFN-γ RNA are shown and quantitated in Fig. 4A. Antagonist activity is seen more clearly in Fig. 4B where extent of inhibition is plotted. Most peptides failed to inhibit SEB-mediated IL-2 mRNA induction perceptibly but pronounced antagonist activity was exhibited by peptides pSEB(150-161), pSEB(152-161), pl2(150-161) and pl0(l 52-161). Dodecapeptide pl2(l 50-161) (SEQ ID NO:2) stands out as antagonist, inhibiting expression of IL-2 mRNA by 18-fold and that of IFN-γ mRNA by 10-fold. Peptide pl0(152-161) (SEQ ID NO:4), which lacks the 2 TV- terminal amino acids of pl2(150-161), showed lower, yet still significant, antagonist activity. In >5 experiments, each performed with a distinct PBMC population, SEB antagonist activity of pl2(150-161) ranged from 9- to 40-fold inhibition of IL-2 gene induction. Corresponding extent of inhibition by pl0(152-161) was up to 8- fold, other peptides remaining well below this value. PBMC cultured with either pSEB(150-161) or p 12(150- 161) showed undiminished viability, as judged by trypan blue exclusion analysis and recovery of total cellular RNA. The SEB antagonist activity of these peptides thus does not result from a cytotoxic effect. Both peptides reproducibly failed to inhibit PHA-mediated induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ genes (not shown). The natural homolog of pl2(150-161), pSEB(150-161), was less active than the variant peptide as SEB antagonist (Fig. 4). Clear differences in antagonist activity between pl2(150-161) and pSEB(150-161) are seen in Figs. 5 and 6. Whereas pSEB(41-61), chosen as control, failed to block induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA by SEB, pi 2(150-161) yielded an almost complete inhibition (Fig. 5). pSEB(150- 161) inhibited expression of IL-2 mRNA effectively at 6 hrs, but only partially at 8 hrs and reduced expression of IFN-γ mRNA by 2 hrs but not thereafter; a stimulatory effect seen at later times (Fig. 5) was not observed consistently (cf. Fig. 6). In the experiment of Figure 6, pl2(150-161) blocked induction of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-β mRNA completely, whereas pSEB(150-161) caused only partial inhibition. pl2(l-161) was consistently more effective than pSEB(150-161) as SEB antagonist. None of the peptides homologous to toxin domains involved in the interaction with T cell receptor and/or MHC class II molecule was able to inhibit the SEB-mediated induction of human IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-β genes. By contrast, the inventors have identified 12-mer pl2(150-161), resembling a region well removed from these active sites which has the capacity to completely block expression of these cytokine genes upon their induction by SEB. The sequence of this potent antagonist peptide is man-made, deviating at various positions from the corresponding sequence in SEB; indeed, when a peptide with the natural SEB sequence was used, pSEB(150- 161), it was less effective as antagonist. Antagonist activity decreased upon removal of 2 N-terminal amino acids. Despite its high degree of conservation, the charge of the corresponding sequence in SEA it neutral whilst that of pSEB(150-161) or of p 12(150- 161), is positive. Indeed, although SEB is 68% homologous with SEC, it shows only 27% homology with SEA [Betley and Mekalanos, J Bacteriol 170:34 (1995)]. The region covering amino acids 150-161 overlaps partially with a larger, 31-amino acid peptide, pSEB(130-160). When conjugated to KLH, pSEB(130-160) inhibited the SEB-induced proliferation of mixed cultures of human peripheral blood monocytes and lymphocytes by 2- to 4-fold but was not unique in this property, since peptides overlapping with other SEB domains, covering amino acids 1-30, 61- 92, 93-112, 151-180, 171-200 and 191-220, had a similar inhibitory effect [Jett et al. (1994) ibid. ]. Although pSEB(130-160) was able to inhibit binding of SEB to human lymphocytes [Jett et al (1994) ibid., Komisar et al, Infect Immun 62:4775 (1994)] it was shown that a smaller overlapping peptide, pSEB(150-162), failed to inhibit binding of SEB to HUT-78 cells, a human T cell line, as studied by fluorescence, whereas another peptide, pSEB(90-l 14), inhibited by 2-fold. Wang et al [(1993) ibid.] showed that a synthetic peptide encoding the carboxy-terminal 41 amino acids of the superantigenic pep M5 protein of S. pyogenes inhibited pep M5- mediated T cell proliferation. They commented with respect to pSEB(152-160) that "most studies seem to indicate that this region does not contribute to mitogenicity" while emphasizing in this context that "immunologic function is not determined solely by the primary amino acid structure of a particular region but is influenced by the context in which it is located" and indicating that the longer amino acid sequence may contribute to α-helix amphi-philicity. The lack of inductive activity of pSEB(150-161) or pl2(150-161) is shown in Fig. 3 for the IL-2 and IFN-γ genes and again for the IL-2 gene in Fig. 5. Indeed, the N-terminal 138 amino acids of SEB, which exclude the domain of pSEB(150-161), are sufficient for mitogenic activity [Buelow et al, J Immunol 148:1 (1992); Kappler et al, J Exp Med 175:387 (1992)]. Thus, it would be expected from these earlier studies that short peptides, especially in the region of pSEB(150-161), will not inhibit the action of SEB. Contrary to this expectation, the results of Figs. 4-6 show that pSEB(150-161) and the non-natural pl2(150-161) are powerful SEB antagonists. Example 5 Enhancement of SEB antagonist activity With PBMC populations from occasional healthy donors, it was observed that pl2(150-161) was only weakly or not inhibitory to SEB. Such an experiment is illustrated in Fig. 7. Whereas pl2(150-161) did not inhibit induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA, both its dimer and trimer forms were strongly inhibitory (shown for IFN-γ in Fig. 7 A). Fig. 7B shows that even when diluted 100-fold, the dimer still gave a detectable inhibition. A similar rise in efficacy was observed when pl2(150-161) was cyclized with terminal cysteines (Cys-pl2(150-161)) (Fig. 8). Given the oxidizing conditions in aqueous solution, this peptide will tend to cyclize by forming an intramolecular disulfide bridge in a zero-order reaction; multimeric forms generated by disulfide bridges between separate peptide molecules will tend to be rarer as they result from a higher order reaction. Whereas pl2(150-161) was weakly or not inhibitory at 8 hrs (Figs. 8A and 8C), Cys-pl2(l 50-161) showed significant SEB antagonist activity, even upon tenfold dilution (Figs. 8B and 8D). An enhancement in SEB antagonist activity was also obtained by addition of a -Ala residue at both N- and C-termini (see Figs. 1 1 and 12 below). Example 6 Broad-spectrum pyrogenic exotoxin antagonist activity The SEB 150-161 domain is conserved among pyrogenic toxins. The sequence of pl2(150-161), shown in SEQ ID NO: 2, differs in several positions from the corresponding sequence in SEB, TNKKKVTAOELD found in pSEB( 150-161), but shared KKK and QELD motifs are spaced equally in both peptides. Residues T150, K152, E159 and D161 of this SEB domain are conserved among all staphylococcal enterotoxins [Swaminathan et al (1992) ibid.]. Indeed, domain 150-161 of SEB is highly conserved among pyrogenic toxins, with 10/12 identities for SEA, SEC1, SEC2, and SPE A and 9/12 for SEE [Bohach and Schlievert (1987) ibid; Couch et al. (1988) ibid.; Bohach and Schlievert (1989) ibid.]. All of these toxins contain the residues underlined above [Swaminathan et al. (1992) ibid. ; Bohach and Schlievert (1987) ibid Couch et al. (1988) ibid; Bohach and Schlievert (1989) ibid.]. The prediction that SEB antagonist peptides may have wider antagonist activity was tested. Figure 9 shows that pSEB(150-161) failed to inhibit the induction of IL-2 mRNA by TSST-1, although it strongly reduced the induction of this mRNA by SEB. As seen in Fig. 10, moreover, p!2(150-161) effectively inhibited the induction by SEB of waves of IL-2 mRNA (A) and IFN-γ mRNA (B) but had no significant effect on their induction by SEA. The results of Figs. 9 and 10 lend support to the earlier conclusion that the antagonist activity of pSEB(150-161) and p!2(150-161) for SEB does not result from a cytotoxic effect on the cells examined because these peptides fail to inhibit induction by TSST-1 and SEA. These results would lead a man of the art to the conclusion that the SEB antagonist activity of the peptides examined does not extend to two less related toxins, TSST-1 and SEA. Nevertheless, in contrast to the results of Figs. 9 and 10 which suggest narrow specificity for the antagonist peptides, Figs. 1 1 and 12 show that broad-spectrum antagonist activity is exhibited by derivatives of p!2(150-161), the dimer described in Fig. 7 and pl2(150-161) carrying D-Ala at both N- and C-termini. Figure 1 1 shows induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA in a PBMC population where peptide pl2(150-161) did not significantly inhibit SEB-induced gene expression. However, both dimer and pl2(150-161) carrying Z)-Ala at both N- and C-termini were effective as antagonist, with the latter showing highest antagonist activity. Despite the low homology between corresponding regions in SEB and TSST-1 (Fig. 12), the D-Ala form also inhibited induction of IL-2 mRNA by TSST-1 (6-hour point in Fig. 11). Figure 12 shows, for another PBMC population, induction of IL-2 mRNA by SEB, by TSST-1 as well as by SEA. Induction of IL-2 mRNA by all three toxins was inhibited by pl2(150-161) carrying D-A\a at both N- and C-termini. For SEB and TSST-1, data with the dimer of p 12(150- 161) are also shown. Induction of IL-2 mRNA by both toxins was inhibited by the dimer. These results show that the SEB antagonist activity of the pl2(150-161) dimer and -Ala forms extends to other members of the pyrogenic exotoxin family, TSST-1 and SEA, indicating their potential broad-spectrum toxin antagonist activity. The dimer, Cys and D-Ala. forms are each more powerful as antagonist than p!2(150- 161) (Figs. 7, 8 and 10). Independent of the basis for enhanced antagonist activity in pl2(150-161) derivatives (they may be more stable, exhibit higher affinity for a target, or both), these results show that the sequence of pl2(150-161) has the potential of being a broad-spectrum pyrogenic exotoxin antagonist. Example 7 Dodecamer antagonist peptide pl2(150-161) elicits, in rabbits, antibodies that protect human T cells, capable of expressing IL-2 and IFN-γ genes, from activation not only by SEB but also by SEA and TSST-1. This finding indicates that used as vaccine, the peptide has the potential to confer broad-spectrum protective immunity. Antiserum against 12(150-161) blocks the action of SEB, SEA and TSST-1 Antibodies raised against an SEB-related peptide might bind to SEB and modulate its action. To allow study of their immunogenicity and ability to elicit protective immunity against SEB, most peptides were synthesized also with an added N- terminal lauryl-Cys or C-terminal Cys (Table 1), to permit their linkage to proteosomes or KLH adjuvant, respectively [as described by Lowell et al. (1996) ibid.], in order to facilitate generation of antibodies. In addition, alum may be used as an immunization adjuvant directly with non-linked peptide, or after linking a peptide to proteosomes or to KLH [Lowell et al. (1996) ibid.]. Sera from rabbits immunized with individual peptides were titrated for their ability to bind SEB. Most of the peptides in Table 1 proved immunogenic by this parameter but greatly differed in titer of serum anti-SEB IgG achieved. Thus, serum against pSEB(13-33)C had a titer of 102,400 while corresponding titers for pSEB(81-93), pSEBLC(41-61) and pl2LC(150-161) were 50, 1,600 and 1,600, respectively (Table 2). On the basis of the results in Table 2, one would not select pl2(150-161) for use as a peptide vaccine but instead, prefer to use pSEB(13-33)C. None of the antisera raised against individual SEB-related peptides had any SEB agonist activity, defined by ability to induce IL-2 or IFN-γ mRNA (not shown). Ability to inhibit SEB-mediated induction of these genes is examined in Fig. 13. Normal rabbit serum did not affect this induction (not shown). Consistent with its high titer of anti-SEB IgG, anti-pSEB(13-33)C serum partially inhibited induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA. However, despite its far lower titer, anti-pl2LC(150-161) serum completely blocked the induction of both genes (Figs. 13 A and 13B). Antisera against pSEB(81-93) and pSEBLC(41-61), which had low titers of anti- SEB IgG, not only failed to inhibit expression of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA but significantly stimulated their SEB-mediated induction (Figs. 13A and 13B). This result was unexpected. This finding raises the possibility that elicitation of SEB- sensitizing antibodies, for example, by a toxoid [Lowell et al, Infect Immun 64: 1706 (1996a); Lowell et al, Infect Immun 64: 4686 (1996b)] or mutant toxin vaccine [Stiles et al, Infect. Immun. 63:1229 (1995); Woody et al, Vaccine 15: 133 (1997)], could lead, in a polyclonal antibody reaction, to exacerbation of toxic immune responses in SEB-exposed individuals. Antibodies raised against peptide pl2(150-161), on the other hand, are free of exacerbating properties as measured in vitro, indicating that the peptide, or its derivatives, may serve as safer anti-toxin vaccine. There was a striking lack of correlation between the ability of anti-peptide sera to bind SEB and to block SEB action. Antisera against pSEBLC(41-61) and pl2LC(l 50-161) showed identical anti-SEB IgG titers yet affected induction of IL-2 and IFN-γ genes by SEB in an opposite manner, stimulation vs. complete inhibition. Apparently, certain antibodies effectively potentiate SEB action while others block it. As judged by serial dilution, inhibition of SEB-mediated gene induction was also up to 30-fold more sensitive for detecting blocking antibodies than binding of IgG to SEB. In an earlier study, rabbit sera raised against SEB peptides 113-144, 130-160, 151- 180 and 171-200 each reduced SEB-induced lymphocyte proliferation weakly (< 2.5-fold), apparently in a nonspecific manner [Jett et al. (1994) ibid.]. Antibodies against pl2(150-161) have broad-spectrum toxin blocking activity. In Figs. 14A and 14B, SEA was used as inducer. Again, sera raised against pl2LC(l 50-161) and pSEB(13-33)C strongly inhibited IL-2 and IFN-γ gene expression. As for SEB (Fig. 13 A), sera raised against pSEB(81-93) or pSEBLC(41- 61) failed to inhibit but instead, stimulated induction of IL-2 mRNA by up to 7-fold over the SEA control. Antiserum against pSEB(81-93) also stimulated expression of IFN-γ mRNA. Antibodies raised against p!2(150-161) and pSEB(21-33)C likewise inhibited the action of the even less related toxin, TSST-1 (Fig. 15). Hence, as judged from inhibition of IL-2 and/or IFN-γ gene expression analysis, protective activity of antibodies elicited by pl2(150-161) is not narrowly restricted in range of pyrogenic exotoxins (Figs. 13-15). These results suggest that pl2(150- 161) is potentially a broad-spectrum peptide vaccine against pyrogenic exotoxins. Example 8 Protective effect of SEB-related peptides as SEB vaccine in mice The finding that antiserum against pl2(150-161) blocks the action of SEB in human PBMC suggested its potential as peptide vaccine. To examine this point, the D- galactosamine-treated mouse model was used [Lowell et al. (1996a) ibid.]. Mice were repeatedly immunized with individual peptides and then challenged with a lethal dose of SEB. Table 3 details the results of 3 separate trials. In the first, formalin-inactivated intact SEB toxoid protected 20% of the mice against a lethal dose of SEB, either upon parenteral (i.m.) or intranasal vaccination. The fact that SEB toxoid did not afford complete protection as reported [Lowell et al. (1996a) ibid.] shows that the conditions of toxin challenge were more severe in the present experiment. In this trial, proteosome-coupled pl2(150-161) yielded 10% protection. Relative to SEB toxoid, pl2(150-161) thus did show protective activity. In the second trial, the ability of proteosome-coupled pSEB(150-161) and p!2(150- 161) to provide immune protection against SEB challenge was compared to that of several larger, synthetic peptides [Jett et al. (1994)] derived from the SEB amino acid sequence, including pSEB(130-160) which overlaps almost completely with pSEB(150-161) and pl2(150-161). None of the larger peptides showed detectable protective activity against intranasal challenge with SEB, yet both pSEB(150-161) and pl2(150-161) afforded protection, evident from 22-29% survival (Table 3). pSEB(150-161) also elicited protective immunity (22%) when vaccination was by the intramuscular route (trial 3) rather than intranasally (trial 2). By contrast, two larger peptides, pSEB(130-160) and pSEB(151-180) that overlap in part with pSEB(l 50-161), failed to give protection. Peptide pSEB(13-33)C, moreover, though able to elicit in rabbits a high titer of IgG that inhibit the action of SEB, SEA and TSST-1 on human T cells, capable of expressing IL-2 and IFN-γ genes, in vitro (Table 2 and Figs. 13-15), was not protective in mice. Despite the severity of challenge with SEB toxin in these early trials, two SEB- related peptides exhibiting SEB antagonist activity, pSEB(150-161) and pi 2(150- 161), also showed activity as SEB vaccine. Protective effect of SEB-related peptides tended to correlate with SEB antagonist activity on human PBMC in vitro (Figs. 4- 6) rather than with the ability to elicit SEB-binding IgG (Table 2). In trials 2 and 3, murine SEB-binding IgG titers were 50-200 for all peptides and did not correlate with protection (Table 3). Significantly, peptide pSEB(13-33)C, though able to elicit in rabbits a high titer of IgG that bind SEB and inhibit SEB action on PBMC in vitro (Table 2 and Fig. 13, was neither active as SEB antagonist (Fig. 4) nor protective in mice (Trial 3). These examples show that it is possible to design an effective pyrogenic exotoxin antagonist. It is surprising that a linear, unstructured dodecapeptide, such as p!2(150-161) or pSEB(150-161), can compete effectively with the intact, folded 239-amino acid SEB protein chain which interacts at multiple domains with regions in the MHC Class II molecule and in the T cell receptor. Such concerted interaction would lead to far higher affinity of binding for intact SEB vis-a-vis the peptides. Yet, as shown clearly in Figs. 4-6, the action of SEB on human PBMC can be neutralized almost completely by the dodecapeptides, especially by p!2(150-161). This first-generation antagonist, moreover, elicited in rabbits the production of antibodies that block the action of SEB on human T cells. Subtle changes in peptide composition had marked effects on its SEB antagonist activity (Figs. 4-6), indicating that substantial improvement is possible by methods known to a man of the art. In principle, significantly enhanced pyrogenic exotoxin antagonist activity can be obtained by generating dimers or multimeric forms (as shown in Fig. 7) or by constraining conformation, by use of disulfide bridges (as shown in Fig. 8). by internal bridges, short-range cyclizations or other means. In principle, improvement of the stability of the described peptides by these means will also render them more effective as peptide vaccine against pyrogenic toxins. For example, the amino acid sequence of these dodecapeptides could also be extended stepwise at their N- or C-termini, or both, either with the natural SEB amino acid sequence, or with a -amino acid that will tend to render the peptide less amenable to digestion by L-amino-acid-specific proteases (as shown for D-Ala. in Figs. 11 and 12) or with aromatic residues such as Trp to enhance the hydrophobicity of the resulting peptide, or with a random sequence of amino acids followed by selection using existing methods, for example, phage display, in order to obtain peptide(s) with enhanced antagonist activity and/or immunoprotective properties. Immunogenicity may be enhanced, for example, by use of in vitro reconstituted MHC/peptide complex as described by Sakita et αl. [Sakita et αl, J. Immunol. Methods 192: 105 (1996)]. There are few examples of short peptides able to bind with sufficiently high affinity to a receptor in order to mimic the binding of the full-length ligand or to block its action. A T-cell receptor antagonist peptide of 4 amino acids was able to inhibit clinical disease progression in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis mediated by a diverse T cell repertoire [Kuchroo et αl, J. Immunol. 153:3326 (1994)]. Peptides derived from the predicted helical region of MHC class II molecules may interact directly with T cell receptors: one such a peptide, a 16-mer, appeared capable of modulating immune responses in a physiologically significant manner [Williams et αl, Immunol Res 11: 11, (1992)]. In another example, a synthetic, 22-amino-acid segment of the human IFN-γ receptor was found to antagonize the action of IFN-γ [Seelig et αl., J Biol Chem 270:9241 (1995)]. The linear forms of peptides generally lack a stable conformation in solution. Interaction with the cognate binding site on a receptor may induce folding of the peptide to mimic conformation in the native protein. Significant improvement in binding affinity can be achieved by generating dimers or multimeric forms of the peptide (Fig. 7) or by constraining conformation, for example, through cyclization (Fig. 8). Thus, by dimerizing bioactive peptides based on an antibody hypervariable region sequence, higher affinity binding was produced; an optimized cyclic peptide showed up to 40-fold enhanced affinity when compared to the linear form [Williams et αl, J Biol Chem 266:5182, (1991)]. A hexapeptide, once cyclized by oxidizing a Cys-hexapeptide-Cys form, showed a higher avidity for the collagen receptor than the more flexible linear structure [Cardarelli et αl, J Biol Chem 267:23159 (1992)]. A synthetic 15-amino-acid peptide mimic of plasma apolipoprotein E failed to bind to the low density lipoprotein receptor but its dimeric form was active in binding; a trimer, moreover, had 20-fold greater activity than the dimer [Dyer and Curtiss, J Biol Chem 266:22803 (1991)]. In addition to affecting peptide conformation and thus enhancing its binding affinity and/or immunogenicity, multimerization or cyclization of a peptide may also enhance its biostability, thus enhancing its efficacy as vaccine. These examples provide to a man of the art methods to improve upon the antagonist activity of SEB-related peptides as detailed in this invention and through this criterion, potential vaccine efficacy. Methods for generating multimeric or cyclic forms of peptides exist, as by direct synthesis (Fig. 7). Another approach is to generate two terminal Cys residues as described above [Cardarelli et al (1992) ibid.]; their oxidation will yield both cyclic and multimeric forms, mostly dimers (Fig. 8). An efficient procedure for the preparation of protected cyclized and protected symmetrical dimeric peptide disulfides by oxidative detachment from a support has been described [Rietman et al, Int J Pept Protein Res 44: 199 (1994)]. Fully cyclic forms of peptides will lack free termini but cyclic peptides can be made by internal bridges, or short-range cyclizations [Toniolo, Int J Peptide Protein Res 35:287 (1990); Gilon et al, Biopolymers 31:745 (1991)] to allow synthesis of LC- or -C termini. The experimental approach employed here used expression of human cytokine genes in vitro as a tool for designing both a broad-spectrum pyrogenic toxin antagonist and a prototypical peptide vaccine. This molecular approach is far more rapid than conventional methods that are based solely on animal tests, allowing evaluation of the biological properties of a candidate peptide well before moving on to animal studies for analysis of vaccine efficacy, prophylactic and therapeutic activity. Specifically, analysis of pyrogenic toxin antagonist activity on human T cells can be used to direct effective vaccine development, even before ability to elicit antibodies is studied in animals. Efficacy of potential vaccine candidates can be evaluated not only by their pyrogenic toxin antagonist activity but also by their ability to elicit production of antibodies in rabbits (shown for SEB in Table 2) that can block the harmful action of pyrogenic exotoxins on human lymphoid cells (Figs. 13-15), independently of their ability to bind toxin. The examples show that assay of the ability of anti- peptide antibodies to block the action of SEB on human cytokine gene expression is far more sensitive than assay of the ability to bind SEB (Table 2 and Figs. 13 and 14. At least certain antisera showing very high anti-SEB IgG titers (Table 2) are not necessarily protective against the toxin. This result casts doubt on the relevance of IgG assays for evaluating or predicting immunoprotection against SEB, as also shown in Table 3, trials 2 and 3. In order to vaccinate humans effectively against one or more pyrogenic toxins, there in a need to assess the efficacy of vaccination. This requirement is independent of the nature of the vaccine, whether a toxoid, a mutant toxin or a peptide. However, unlike experimental animals (Table 3), humans cannot be challenged with toxin to test if the vaccination was effective. Therefore, it is desirable to use a surrogate marker instead, preferably one based on human T cell activation. Such a marker is provided through the method used in Figs. 13-15, which measures the ability of serum from an immunized individual to antagonize toxin-mediated activation of human T cells. Given the fact that humans are far more sensitive than mice to staphylococcal toxins, use of human T cells as shown in Figs. 13 to 15 has advantages over use of murine cells [Stiles et al, Infect Immun 63:1229 (1995)]. Toxin-mediated activation of T cells is preferably measured by the induction of IL- 2, IFN-γ or TNF-β gene expression, which yields information on the response of these genes within a few hours after their induction, long before any effect on cell proliferation. SEB-related peptides with demonstrated SEB antagonist activity, pl2(150-161) and pSEB(150-161), carry sequence elements that are highly conserved amongst pyrogenic toxins. Through improved peptide design, including introduction of structural constraints, peptides may thus be generated that exhibit broader antagonist activity (Figs. 1 1, 12). A peptide antagonist able to protect against a range of related enterotoxins would be far more valuable than a narrowly active one. Rabbit sera raised against pl2(150-161) were equally able to block the ability of SEB, SEA or TSST-1 to induce expression of IL-2 and IFN-γ genes (Figs. 13-15) These results show a potential for broader protective immunity. A peptide vaccine able to impart protective immunity against a range of related enterotoxins would be far more valuable than a narrowly active one. An unexpected finding, shown in Figs. 13 and 14, is that antisera against certain SEB peptides not only fail to block the action of SEB on human lymphoid cells, but actually stimulate it significantly. This result should alert one to the possibility that vaccination with such peptide domains, including those present in SEB toxoid or other derivatives of the SEB toxin molecule, could sensitize an exposed person to the lethal effects of SEB and other pyrogenic exotoxins, for example SEA, rather than protect him. Table 1 SEB-related peptides prepared for this study Position Amino acid sequence LC- -C 13-24 KSSKFTGLMENM -r ~ 13-33 KSSKFTGLMENMKNLYDDNHN + + 21-33 MEΝMKNLYDDΝHN + + 41-53 IDQFLYFDLIYSI 41-61 IDQFLYFDLIYSI KDT K LGNY + + 51-61® YSI KDT K LGNY - + 53-61 I KDT K LGNY + - 81-92 YVDVFGANYYYQ + - 81-93 YVDVFGANYYYQC 150-161 TNKKKVTAQELD + _ 150-161* YNKKKATVQELD + _ 152-161 KKKVTAQELD 152-161* KKKATNQELD 208-218 FDQSKYLMMYΝ + + LC- Lauryl-cysteyl residue added at Ν-terminus -C Cysteyl residue added at C-terminus ® Only the -C form was studied * Variant of the natural SEB sequence Table 2 Anti-SEB antibody titers in sera from rabbits immunized with SEB-related peptides SEB Peptide SEB IgG Titer pSEBLC(13-24) 800 pSEBLC(13-33) 800 pSEBLC(21-33) 100 pSEBLC(41-61) 1,600 pSEBLC(53-61) 1,600 pSEBLC(81-92) 1,600 pl2LC(150-161) 1,600 pSEBLC(208-218) 1,600 pSEB(13-33)C 102,400 pSEB(21-33)C 25,600 pSEB(41-61)C 200 pSEB(51-61)C 400 pSEB(81-93) 50 pSEB(208-218)C 200 See Table 1 for explanation of SEB peptides. For immunization, peptides carrying LC at their N-terminus were coupled to proteosomes; peptides carrying C at their C- terminus were coupled to KLH. Sera were assayed for IgG able to bind SEB. Table 3. Protective Effect of SEB Peptides in Mice Trial Vaccine No. of Vaccine Challenge Challenge IgG Percent Animals Route Route (μg SEB) Titer Survival 1 pl2LC(150-161) 10 IM IM 25 10 pl2LC(150-161) 10 IN IM 25 10 SEB Toxoid 10 IM IM 25 20 SEB Toxoid 10 IN IM 25 20 2 pSEBLC(150-161) 7 IN IN 350 200 29 pl2LC(150-161) 9 IN IN 350 200 22 pSEBLC(93-112) 9 IN IN 350 200 0 pSEBLC(130-160) 9 IN IN 350 200 0 pSEBLC(191-220) 9 IN IN 350 200 0 pSEB(191-220)C 9 IN IN 350 50 0 Control 5 IN IN 350 100 0 3 pSEBLC(150-161) 9 IM IN 350 200 22 pSEB(13-33)C 9 IM IN 350 100 0 pSEBLC(93-112) 9 IM IN 350 200 0 pSEBLC(130-160) 9 IM IN 350 100 0 pSEBLC(151-180) 9 IM IN 350 200 0 pSEBLC(l 91-220) 9 IM IN 350 200 0 pSEB(191-220)C 9 IM IN 350 50 0 Groups of mice were vaccinated with SEB-related peptides or SEB toxoid as indicated. SEB toxoid [Lowell et al, (1996) ibid.], peptides pSEB(93-112), pSEB(130-160), pSEB(151-180), pSEB( 191-220) and pSEB(191-220)C [Jett et al, (1994) ibid.] and preparation of LC-derivatives for coupling to proteosomes [Lowell et al, (1996) ibid.], were described elsewhere. In trial 1, 2 vaccinations were given 2 weeks apart, with SEB challenge after 1 month. In trials 2 and 3, 3 vaccinations were given at 2-week intervals, followed by a boost after 6 weeks and SEB challenge 2 weeks later. IgG were determined 3 weeks before challenge. IM, intramuscular; IN, intranasal. Table 4 lists for each of the SEQ ID NOs' of the sequence listing, the corresponding alternative notation used in the specification. Table 4 Identification of SEB related peptides by their SEQ. ID. No. SEQ ID NO: Alternative Sequence notation SEQ ID No.1 pSEB(150-161) TNKKKVTAQELD SEQ ID No.2 P 12(150-161) YNKKKATVQELD SEQ ID No.3 pSEB(152-161) KKKATVQELD SEQ ID No.4 pl0(152-161) KKKVTAQELD SEQ ID No.5 pSEBLC(150-161) lc TNKKKVTAQELD SEQ ID No.6 pl2LC(150-161) IcYNKKKATVQELD SEQ ID No.7 Dimer YNKKKATVQELDYNKKKATVQEL D SEQ ID No.8 Trimer YNKKKATVQELDYNKKKATVQEL DYNKKKATVQELD SEQ ID No.9 Cys-pl2(150-161) CYNKKKATVQELDC SEQ ID No.10 -Ala daYN KK K A T V Q E L Dda SEQ ID No.11 Ac-pl2(150-161) acYN KK K A T V Q E L Dda SEQ ID No.12 SEB ESQPDPKPDELHKSSKFTGLMENM KVLYDDNHVSAINVKSIDQFLYFD LIYSIKDTKLGNYDNVRVEFKNKD LADKYKDKYVDVFGANYYYQCYF SKKTNDINSHETDKRKTCMYGGVT EHNGNQLDKYRSITVRVFEDGKNL LSFDVQTNKKKVTAQELDYLTRH YLVKNKKLYEFNNSPYETGYIKFI ENENSFWYDMMPAPGDKFDQSKY LMMYNDNKMVDSKDVKIEVYLTT KKK lc, Λ auryl-cysteyl; da, -Ala; ac, N-acetyl. SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INFORMATION: (i) APPLICANT: (A) NAME: YISSUM RES. DEVELOP. CO. OF THE HEBREW UNIV. OF JERUSALEM (B) STREET: 46 Jabotins y street (C) CITY: Jerusalem (E) COUNTRY: ISRAEL (F) POSTAL CODE (ZIP): 91042 (G) TELEPHONE: 972-2-5634880 (H) TELEFAX: 972-2-5660331 (ii) TITLE OF INVENTION: BRAOD SPECTRUM PYROGENIC EXOTOXINS ANTAGONISTS AND VACCINES (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 12 (iv) COMPUTER READABLE FORM: (A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk (B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS (D) SOFTWARE: Patentln Release #1.0, Version #1.25 (EPO) (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 1 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 12 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 1 : Thr Asn Lys Lys Lys Val Thr Ala Gin Glu Leu Asp 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 2: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 12 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 2: Tyr Asn Lys Lys Lys Ala Thr Val Gin Glu Leu Asp 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 3: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH 10 ammo acids (B) TYPE ammo acid (C) STRANDEDNESS single (D) TOPOLOGY unknown (n) MOLECULE TYPE peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION SEQ ID NO 3 Lys Lys Lys Ala Thr Val Gin Glu Leu Asp 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO 4 (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS (A) LENGTH 10 amino acids (B) TYPE amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS single (D) TOPOLOGY unknown (n) MOLECULE TYPE peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION SEQ ID NO 4 Lys Lys Lys Val Thr Ala Gin Glu Leu Asp 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO 5 (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS (A) LENGTH 13 ammo acids (B) TYPE amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS single (D) TOPOLOGY unknown (n) MOLECULE TYPE peptide (IX) FEATURE (A) NAME/KEY Modified-site (B) LOCATION 1 (D) OTHER INFORMATION /label= X /note= "N-lauryl cysteine residue" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION SEQ ID NO 5 Xaa Thr Asn Lys Lys Lys Val Thr Ala Gin Glu Leu Asp 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO 6 (l) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS (A) LENGTH 13 am o acids (B) TYPE amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS single (D) TOPOLOGY unknown (n) MOLECULE TYPE peptide (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: Modified-site (B) LOCATION: 1 (D) OTHER INFORMATION: /label= X /note= "N-lauryl cysteine" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 6: Xaa Tyr Asn Lys Lys Lys Ala Thr Val Gin Glu Leu Asp 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 7: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 24 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 7: Tyr Asn Lys Lys Lys Ala Thr Val Gin Glu Leu Asp Tyr Asn Lys Lys 1 5 10 15 Lys Ala Thr Val Gin Glu Leu Asp 20 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 8: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 35 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 8: Tyr Asn Lys Lys Lys Ala Thr Val Gin Glu Leu Asp Tyr Asn Lys Lys 1 5 10 15 Lys Ala Thr Val Gin Glu Leu Asp Tyr Asn Lys Lys Lys Ala Thr Val 20 25 30 Glu Leu Asp 35 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 9: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 14 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME KEY: Disulfide-bond (B) LOCATION: 1..14 (D) OTHER INFORMATION: /label= X /note= "Disulfide bond formed by the two external Cys residues." (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: Modified-site (B) LOCATION: 14 (D) OTHER INFORMATION: /label= X /note= "Extension with a cysteine residue." (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: Modified-site (B) LOCATION: 1 (D) OTHER INFORMATION: /label= X /note= "Extension with a cysteine residue" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 9: Xaa Tyr Asn Lys Lys Lys Ala Thr Val Gin Glu Leu Asp Xaa 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 10: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 14 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: Modified-site (B) LOCATION: 1 (D) OTHER INFORMATION: /label= X /note= "D-alanine residue." (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: Modified-site (B) LOCATION: 14 (D) OTHER INFORMATION: /label= X /note= "D-alanine residue" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 10: Xaa Tyr Asn Lys Lys Lys Ala Thr Val Gin Glu Leu Asp Xaa 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 1 1 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 14 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: Modified-site (B) LOCATION: 1 (D) OTHER INFORMATION: /label= X /note= "N-acetyl group" (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: Modified-site (B) LOCATION: 14 (D) OTHER INFORMATION: /label= X /note= "D-alanine residue" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 1 1 : Xaa Tyr Asn Lys Lys Lys Ala Thr Val Gin Glu Leu Asp Xaa 1 5 10 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 12: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 239 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Staphylococcus aureus (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 12: Glu Ser Gin Pro Asp Pro Lys Pro Asp Glu Leu His Lys Ser Ser Lys 1 5 10 15 Phe Thr Gly Leu Met Glu Asn Met Lys Val Leu Tyr Asp Asp Asn His 20 25 30 Val Ser Ala He Asn Val Lys Ser He Asp Gin Phe Leu Tyr Phe Asp 35 40 45 Leu He Tyr Ser He Lys Asp Thr Lys Leu Gly Asn Tyr Asp Asn Val 50 55 60 Arg Val Glu Phe Lys Asn Lys Asp Leu Ala Asp Lys Tyr Lys Asp Lys 65 70 75 80 Tyr Val Asp Val Phe Gly Ala Asn Tyr Tyr Tyr Gin Cys Tyr Phe Ser 85 90 95 Lys Lys Thr Asn Asp He Asn Ser His Glu Thr Asp Lys Arg Lys Thr 100 105 1 10 Cys Met Tyr Gly Gly Val Thr Glu His Asn Gly Asn Gin Leu Asp Lys 1 15 120 125 Tyr Arg Ser He Thr Val Arg Val Phe Glu Asp Gly Lys Asn Leu Leu „_, 47 130 135 140 Ser Phe Asp Val Gin Thr Asn Lys Lys Lys Val Thr Ala Gin Glu Leu 145 150 155 160 Asp Tyr Leu Thr Arg His Tyr Leu Val Lys Asn Lys Lys Leu Tyr Glu 165 170 175 Phe Asn Asn Ser Pro Tyr Glu Thr Gly Tyr He Lys Phe He Glu Asn 180 185 190 Glu Asn Ser Phe Trp Tyr Asp Met Met Pro Ala Pro Gly Asp Lys Phe 195 200 205 Asp Gin Ser Lys Tyr Leu Met Met Tyr Asn Asp Asn Lys Met Val Asp 210 215 220 Ser Lys Asp Val Lys He Glu Val Tyr Leu Thr Thr Lys Lys Lys 225 230 235

Claims: CLAIMS: 1. A peptide comprising an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino acid sequence of a fragment of a pyrogenic exotoxin, and derivatives of said peptide capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins. 2. A peptide comprising an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino acid sequence of a fragment of a pyrogenic exotoxin, and derivatives of said peptide capable of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 3. A peptide according to claim 1 or 2 wherein said pyrogenic exotoxin is a bacterial exotoxin. 4. A peptide according to claim 3 wherein said exotoxin is produced by Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pyogenes. 5. A peptide according to claim 4 comprising an amino acid sequence substantially homologous to the amino acid sequence of a fragment of Staphylococcal aureus enterotoxin B (SEB). 6. A peptide according to claim 5 comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NOT and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 7. A peptide according to claim 6 having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NOT and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 8. A peptide according to claim 5 comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:2 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 9. A peptide according to claim 8 having the amino acid sequence shown in SED ID NO:2 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 10. A peptide according to claim 5 comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:3 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 11. A peptide according to claim 10 having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:3 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 12. A peptide according to claim 5 comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:4 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 13. A peptide according to claim 12 having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:4 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 14. A peptide according to any one of claims 1, 3 to 6, 8, 10 or 12, wherein said fragment may be further linked through its N-terminus to a lauryl-cysteine (LC) residue and/or through its C-terminus to a cysteine (C) residue, or to other residue/s suitable for linking said peptide to adjuvant/s for immunization. 15. A peptide according to claim 14 having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:5 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 16. A peptide according to claim 14 having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 6 and derivatives thereof capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 17. A peptide according to any one of claims 1 to 16 in the form of a dimer, a multimer or in a constrained conformation. 18. A peptide according to claim 17 having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:7 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 19. A peptide according to claim 17 having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 8 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 20. A peptide according to claim 17 which is conformationally constrained by internal bridges, short-range cyclizations, extension or other chemical modification. 21. A peptide according to claim 20 having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 9 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 22. A peptide according to claim 20 extended at the N-terminus and/or C-terminus thereof with amino acid residue/s identical to those in the corresponding position/s of said pyrogenic exotoxin or with different amino acid residue/s, which may be naturally occurring or synthetic amino acid residue/s. 23. A peptide according to claim 22 having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 10 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 24. A peptide according to claim 22 comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 11 and derivatives thereof, capable of eliciting protective immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins and/or of antagonizing toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 25. A peptide according to any one of claims 1 to 24 capable of inhibiting expression of pyrogenic toxin-induced mRNA encoded by the IL-2, IFN-γ or TNF-β genes. 26. A peptide according to any one of claims 1 to 24 capable of eliciting the production of antibodies that block T-cell activation. 27. A pharmaceutical composition for the treatment or prophylaxis of toxin- mediated activation of T cells, comprising as active ingredient a therapeutically effective amount of at least one peptide or derivative thereof according to any one of claims 2 to 25. 28. A vaccine for conferring immunity against toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins comprising as active ingredient an immunologically effective amount of at least one peptide or derivative thereof according to any one of claims 1, 3 to 24 and 26. 29. A vaccine according to claim 28 further comprising a suitable immunization adjuvant selected from proteosomes, KLH or alum or combinations thereof. 30. A vaccine according to claim 29 wherein said immunizing adjuvant is a combination of proteosomes and alum or is a combination of KLH and alum. 31. A vaccine according to any one of claims 28 to 30 for enhancing production of antibodies that block T cell activation. 32. A method for treating harmful effects and toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin comprising administering to a patient in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount of a composition according to claim 27. 33. A method according to claim 32 wherein said harmful effect is food poisoning. 34. A method for treating harmful effects and toxic shock induced by at least one pyrogenic exotoxin comprising administering to a patient in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount of at least one peptide according to claim 2 to 25. 35. A method according to claim 34 for treating food poisoning induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin. 36. A method for preventing harmful effects and toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins comprising administering to a patient in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount of a composition according to claim 27 or a therapeutically effective amount of at least one peptide according to any of claims 2 to 25. 37. A method for conferring immunity to toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins, comprising administering to a patient an effective immunizing amount of a vaccine according to any of claims 28 to 31 or of at least one peptide according to any of claims 1, 3 to 24 and 26. 38. Use of a peptide according to any of claims 1 to 24 and 26 in the preparation of a vaccine according to any one of claims 34 to 38 or of a peptide according to any of claims 2 to 24 in the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition according to claim 27. 39. An antiserum containing antibodies directed against a peptide according to claim 25, which peptide is capable of eliciting the production of said antibodies, preferably in the presence of a suitable immunization adjuvant. 40. An antiserum according to claim 39 wherein said suitable immunizing adjuvant is proteosome, KLH or alum or combinations thereof. 41. An antiserum according to claim 40 wherein said immunizing adjuvant is a combination of proteosomes and alum or is a combination of KLH and alum. 42. An antiserum according to any of claims 39 to 41 which is a domestic animal antiserum. 43. An antiserum according to any of claims 39 to 42 capable of alleviating harmful effects and toxic shock induced by a pyrogenic exotoxin or by a mixture of pyrogenic exotoxins. 44. A method for assessing the efficacy of a vaccine for conferring immunity against one or more pyrogenic toxins comprising determining the ability of serum from an immunized individual to antagonize toxin-mediated activation of T cells. 45. A method according to claim 44 wherein the ability of serum from an immunized individual to antagonize toxin-mediated activation of T cells is determined by measuring the inhibition of expression of pyrogenic toxin- induced mRNA encoded by the IL-2, IFN-γ or TNF-β genes. 46. A kit for assessing the efficacy of a vaccine for conferring immunity against one or more pyrogenic toxins comprising determining the ability of serum from an immunized individual to antagonize toxin-mediated activation of T cells by the method of claim 44 or 45.

Inventors: ARAD GILA, KAEMPFER RAYMOND, ARAD, GILA, KAEMPFER, RAYMOND
Applicants: ARAD GILA, KAEMPFER RAYMOND, YISSUM RES DEV CO, ARAD, GILA, KAEMPFER, RAYMOND, YISSUM RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF THE HEBREW
Application year: 1997
Main classification: C07K14
IPC codes: A61K39, A61P31, C07K14, C07K16, C12N15, G01N33