MEDIA ACCESS CONTROL FOR ISOCHRONOUS DATA PACKETS IN CARRIER SENSING MULTIPLE ACCESS SYSTEMS

Abstract: The present invention has solved the collision problems in a CSMA network protocol and at the same time optimized performance of the network. This is accomplished by giving control of the size of the reserved portion and the size of the reservation portion of the communication frame to stations in the network. Further, the reserved portion is allotted to isochronous data packets each of whose length is variable. Also, only those packets that have a reservation are in the frame, and they are placed in the frame in order in accordance with the position of the permission or reservation list. The network timing is controlled by one of the stations acting as a conductor for the network. This conductor station receives the reservation requests from the other stations and builds a beat packet. The beat packet is transmitted from the conductor station to all stations of the network, and provides the timing or beat of the network that all stations are synchronized with. In addition, the beat packet contains the permission list (reservation list) identifying the stations that will transmit, and when they will transmit during the frame. The network interrupt handler (46) and the conductor (56) at the conductor station build this beat packet.

Description: MEDIA ACCESS CONTROL FOR ISOCHRONOUS DATA PACKETS IN CARRIER SENSING MULTIPLE ACCESS SYSTEMS CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION This application is related to the following co-pending, commonly assigned patent application of K Gross, C Anderson, and D Lieb, entitled "ORDER PERSISTENT TIMER FOR CONTROLLING EVENTS AT MULTIPLE PROCESSING STATIONS", Serial Number 08/631 ,067 and filed concurrently herewith, the disclosure of which is incoφorated herein by reference in its entirety BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention This invention relates to a media access control for handling transmission and reception of isochronous data and asynchronous data More particularly, the invention relates to preventing collisions during the transmission of isochronous data in carrier sensing multiple access transmission systems Description of Related Art With the advent of multimedia processing in computing systems and increased deployment of digital audio and video formats, there is an increased demand for reliable transmission of synchronous and isochronous data over standard computer networks Audio and video are but examples of synchronous oi isochronous data Any data stream that must be clocked and continuous would be considered synchronous A data stream which must be delivered with determinant latency could be considered isochronous Local area networks, such as Ethernet, were developed to carry computer data Computer data is primarily asynchronous in nature, and is not highly sensitive to non-deterministic latencies Ethernet uses a earner sense multiple access with collision detection media access control protocol (CSMA/CD MAC) This type of MAC is characterized by very low typical latencies, and reasonably high potential throughput The shortcomings of Ethernet for the transmission of synchronous and isochronous data are in it's potentially high latencies when collisions occur between stations transmitting on the network Numerous schemes have been developed for the transmission of synchronous and isochronous data over multiple access transmission systems A reservation system typically employs two communications channels, one channel, the reservation channel, is used to communicate reservation requests from individual stations to a central authoπty which then allocates bandwidth in the primary channel, as requested, if possible The reservation channel typically carries asynchronous data, while the primary channel carries isochronous data Several schemes have been previously devised to implement a reservation system on a single multiple access channel These schemes involve time dividing the channel into "frames" and further subdividing the frames to create the two channels required for a reservation system One such system divides a frame into two Time Division Multiplexed (TDM) regions, one for the primary channel and one for the reservation channel Another scheme splits frames into a TDM primary channel region and a CSMA reservation region To date, there is no solution to collision problems in a CSMA protocol without significant inefficiencies in transmission SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention solves the latency problem by essentially eliminating collisions for synchronous and isochronous data on an Ethernet network The current invention differs from previous schemes in that it works on an unmodified Ethernet network using standard Ethernet transceivers and controllers augmented by a simple timing circuit The current invention also differs from previous schemes in that the boundary between the primary and reservation regions of the frame floats allowing the relative bandwidths allocated to the primary and reservation channels to balance dynamically as traffic conditions vary in time During the reservation portion ofthe frame an "adaptive p-persistent" MAC is employed. During the primary channel region ofthe frame, the current invention utilizes an "ordered persistent" or "o-persistent" MAC. The present invention has solved the collision problems in a CSMA network protocol and at the same time optimized performance ofthe network. This is accomplished by giving control ofthe size ofthe reserved portion and the size ofthe reservation portion ofthe communication frame to stations in the network Further, the reserved portion is allotted to isochronous data packets each of whose length is variable. Also, only those packets that have a reservation are in the frame, and they are placed in the frame in order in accordance with their position on the permission or reservation list. An order persistent timer is provided in each station to control the timing of transmission of each isochronous data packet from a station and to also control the timing of transmission of asynchronous data packets that include reservation requests. The OP timer at each station monitors traffic in the network from other stations to detect whether the network is active or idle. In an active state, the OP timer times a set interval of time sufficient to indicate the successful transmission of a packet on the frame. In the idle state (no packet on the network from another station), the OP timer times a number of deferral time intervals that are used with a network interrupt handler at the station to control the transmission of isochronous datajDackets without collision, and asynchronous data packets thereafter. The network timing is controlled by one of the stations acting as a conductor for the network. This conductor station receives the reservation requests from the other stations and builds a beat packet. The beat packet is transmitted from the conductor station to all stations ofthe network, and provides the timing or beat ofthe network that all stations are synchronized with. In addition, the beat packet contains the permission list (reservation list) identifying the stations that will transmit, and when they will transmit during the frame. The network interrupt handler and the conductor at the conductor station build this beat packet. Each station also has a frame interrupt handler that queues data from a synchronous data stream as isochronous packets in a transmit pipeline buffer awaiting transmission The frame interrupt handler also unloads isochronous packets from a receive pipeline buffer, and converts them to a synchronous data stream A supervisor works asynchronous pipeline buffers to load and unload asynchronous control messages transmitted as asynchronous data packets The reservation requests are also transmitted as asynchronous data packets to the conductor at the conductor station from stations making reservation requests The network interrupt handler will maximize the transmission of isochronous data packets Space in the communication frame is given first to isochronous data packets Thereafter, remaining space is filled with asynchronous data packets until the frame is full The great utility of the invention is that the communication frame has maximum efficiency, while collisions between isochronous data packets is avoided The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention be apparent from the following more particular description of a preferred embodiment of the invention as illustrated in the accompany drawings BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG 1 illustrates a network of stations where each station is implemented in accordance with the invention FIG 2 A illustrates a preferred embodiment for the station hardware of the invention FIG 2B shows the hardware and software elements of the preferred embodiment of the invention FIG 2C shows the input/output data and signals for the Ethernet controller in FIGS 2A and 2B FIG 3 shows the format of a beat packet FIG 4 shows the ordered persistent timer of FIGS 2 A and 2B FIG 5, composed of FIGS 5A and 5B, illustrates the flow of operations performed by the network interrupt handler in FIG 2B to handle with the Ethernet controller the transmission and reception of packets at the station FIG 6 illustrates the flow of operations performed by the network interrupt handler with the OP timer to schedule transmissions and to initiate transmissions FIG 7, composed of FIGS 7A and 7B shows the operations for scheduling the transmission of isochronous and asynchronous data packets FIG 8 shows the format of a transmitted frame having a beat packet, isochronous data packets and asynchronous data packets FIG 9 is a timing diagram for the transmission of isochronous and asynchronous data packets in a network such as FIG 1 having stations as shown in FIGS 2A and 2B FIG 10 shows the logical operations performed by the frame interrupt handler working with the synchronous I/O and the isochronous data buffers FIG 1 1 illustrates the logical operations performed by conductor 56 (FIG 2B) in handling an asynchronous request FIG 12 illustrates additional operations performed by the frame interrupt handler in response to a timer tick event FIG 13 illustrates additional operations performed by the network interrupt handler 46 dunny an OP timer event DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS In the network of FIG 1 , each of the stations connected to network 8 is implemented in accordance with the preferred embodiment ofthe invention Station #1 is the conductor for the network and generates the beat packet that provides the timing for the network and a permission list to each of the stations All stations receive the beat packet at the beginning of a frame The permission list in the beat packet controls the sequence of transmission of isochronous data packets on the network by the various stations This permission list of isochronous or iso channels is used to generate a deferred time of transmission for iso channels from each station An iso channel is an isochronous data packet with a defined destination station, or stations, in the network Each station generates a deferral value based on the position of its iso channel on the permission list An ordered persistent timer in each station uses the deferral value to control the timing of transmission of an iso channel from the station Each station working with the OP timer schedules transmission times for iso channels when the network is active (packet is on the network) and initiates transmission of an iso channel (an isochronous packet) on 0 (zero) deferral for the iso channel FIG 2A illustrates a preferred embodiment of a station or node, hardware architecture in accordance with the invention When the node is operating in a receive mode Ethernet packets of information are received from the communication network at the Ethernet transceiver 10 From transceiver 10, the Ethernet packets go to the Ethernet controller 12 Controller 12 buffers the packets while they are being stored for processing in the node at the static RAM 14 When the node is operating in a transmission mode, the node processor 16 will place the packets to be transmitted into static RAM 14 When the node or station is ready to transmit the packets, they are pulled from the static RAM 14 and sent out over the network link through the Ethernet controller 12 and the Ethernet transceiver 10 Static RAM 14 is the mam working storage for node processor 16 Flash RAM 18 is non-volatile storage storing the program code used by the node processor 16 and storing configuration information for the node, such as the station address The ordered persistent (OP) timer 20 monitors traffic on the network by monitoring Ethernet packets received by transceiver 10 The OP timer communicates with the node processor to indicate the presence, or absence, of traffic on the network The operations of the OP timer will be described in detail hereinafter with reference to FIG 4 The node processor 16 is connected to the Ethernet controller 12, RAM 14 and RAM 18 through the address and data buses 22 Node processor 16 also has a serial data input/output (I/O) port 24, a parallel data I/O port 26, and a connection 28 to system status indicators The serial data I/O port 24 is provided so that the node can transmit, or receive, low speed serial asynchronous data The high-speed synchronous data is being handled by synchronous receiver 30 and synchronous transmitter 32 An application of the serial data I/O port 24, in combination with the synchronous receiver 30, might be the transmission of an audio signal, such as music, from a CD Compact Disk The music audio signal from the CD would be the synchronous input into synchronous receiver 30 The controls for the CD, such as selection of the track to be played, would be via the serial data I/O port 24 Parallel data I/O port 26 has a similar purpose to serial data I/O port 24 in that it may aiso be used to pass input/output control signals associated with synchronous input/output data that is to be transmitted, or received, over the network Lines 28 connected to system status indicators provide diagnostic information about the node The indicators are status lights that are controlled from node processor 16 to indicate status of the node -- transmitting, receiving, failure, etc Note that data on the Ethernet controller side ofthe control processor is isochronous data On the other hand, data at the synchronous receiver and synchronous transmitter is synchronous data Thus, the control processor working with static RAM 14 is converting synchronous data to isochronous data, or vice-versa, depending on the direction of flow of data through the node The clock signals for timing control of the synchronous data are provided by clock module 34 Clock module 34 is a phase-locked loop The timing signal to which this phase-locked loop is locked is a beat packet received from the network by Ethernet controller 12 The beat packet is the timing signal for the network, and is passed by the node processor 16 to the clock module 34 to lock the phase-lock-loop to the network timing Clock module 34 can also be locked to a clock at the local node ln this case, the synchronization of I/O data is from a local clock into the clock module 34, and the phase-lock-loop locks to that local clock The node in FIG 2A would then be the source of beat packet timing signals which would be sent out over the network through the Ethernet controller 12 and Ethernet transceiver 10 A third possibility is that there could be a local clock and a separate network clock signal ln this situation, the node processor 16, with the phase-lock-loop clock module 34, would operate as a timing coordinator to convert signals between the local clock timing and the network clock timing In any of these three clock scenarios, the phase- lock-loop clock module 34 provides the clock signals for the synchronous receiver 30 and the synchronous transmitter 32 In the simplest form, the synchronous receiver is an analog-to-digital converter, and the synchronous transmitter is a digital-to-analog converter FIG 2B illustrates the interaction between storage devices, hardware modules and software in the preferred embodiment to perform the operations of the invention The storage devices are the pipeline, or FEFO, buffers 41, 42, 43 and 44 and beat packet buffer 45 The software includes the network interrupt handler 46, the phase detector 48, audio/video (or other synchronous data) processor 50, frame interrupt handler 52, supervisor 54, and conductor 56 The hardware components include OP timer 20, Ethernet controller 12, reference clock 62, clock source selector 64, oscillator 66, s>nchronous data input/output 68 (receiver 30 and transmitter 32 of FIG 2A) and the control input/output ports 70 (ports 24 and 26 of FIG 2A) Network interrupt handler 46 is invoked any time there is an event on the network The network events that invoke the handler come from either the Ethernet controller 12, or the ordered persistent (OP) timer 20 In the case of Ethernet controller 12, there are three possible events -- ( 1 ) a packet has been transmitted, (2) a packet has been received, and (3) a network error has occurred A packet transmission event only occurs if the Ethernet controller has been told to transmit a packet The packet receive event can occur any time that a packet is received from the network In the case of the OP timer 20, there are two events that invoke the network interrupt handler The first event is detection of a successful transmission of a packet The second event is the timing out of a deferral interval In a packet receive event, the Ethernet controller 60 has received a packet with a destination address identifying this node as the destination The destination address may be a specific address for this node, or it may be a multi-cast address where this node has been configured to receive packets with that multi¬ cast address When the network interrupt handler detects a receive packet event from the Ethernet controller, the RX (receive) module 46A detects whether the received packet contains isochronous data or asynchronous data There is a marker in each packet to identify the type of data If the packet contains isochronous data, then receive module 46A places the packet in queue, in FIFO buffer 41 If the receive packet contains asynchronous data, the packet is placed in FIFO buffer 42 by receive module 46A Illustrated in FIG 2B are buffers to handle single channel receive and transmit of data If the node is to handle multiple channel transmission and receipt of data in packets, then there would need to be additional sets of transmit and receive buffers, or FIFO pipeline type buffers, for each channel The buffers 41 -45 indicated in FIG 2B are storage locations in static RAM 14 (FIG 2 A) Further the buffers may be implemented as actual physical storage locations, or thev mav be pointers to the actual physical storage location Isochronous data from a packet is buffered in FIFO 41 until frame interrupt handler 52 is ready to process the data Frame interrupt handler is a software module that is clocked by oscillator 66 In other words, the frame interrupt handler module is looking for an event which is the clock pulse from oscillator 66 When that event occurs, the frame interrupt handler 52 pulls isochronous data from buffer 41 to build a frame of synchronous data for processing by audio/video processor 50 The isochronous data may be either audio/video or any other data that has an isochronous or synchronous requirement After the data is processed by processor 50, it is passed out over the synchronous I/O 68 Asynchronous data received in a packet and then buffered in FIFO 42 is passed to a supervisor software module 54 and conductor 56 The supervisor module will recognize control signals from the asynchronous data and generate control signals on the I/O ports. For example, a control signal received as asynchronous data destined for the serial data I/O port 24 (FIG. 2A) would be recognized by the supervisor module 54 and sent out over the control I/O hardware. Asynchronous data sent to the conductor includes reservation requests, as will be described hereinafter. During transmission mode, the synchronous data from an audio/video source comes into the node through the synchronous receiver in I/O 68, is processed by the processor 50, and is passed to the frame interrupt handler 52. Frame interrupt handler 52, when triggered by a clock signal from oscillator 66, places the synchronous data into FIFO buffer 43. Buffer 43 is effectively buffering isochronous data for transmission. Network interrupt handler 46, working with the Ethernet controller 60, will pull the isochronous data now in buffer 43 out of the buffer, build a Ethernet packet and send the Ethernet packet out onto the network. Alternatively, the frame interrupt handler builds synchronous data packets. These data packets are loaded/unloaded synchronously on the frame interrupt handler side of the FIFO buffers 41-44 and loaded/unloaded isochronously on the network interrupt handler side of the FIFO buffers. The audio/video processor 50 and the audio/video source may be remotely controlled through the network by the node receiving asynchronous control signals The asynchronous control signals from the network are received and passed through buffer 42 to the supervisor 54. Supervisor 54 passes the control signals to audio/video processor 50 directly or to the audio/video source or destination through control I/O 70. During transmission mode, control data received through the control I/O 70 is handled by the supervisor 54. Supervisor 54 places the asynchronous control data into buffer 44. The transmit (TX) module 46B pulls the asynchronous control data from buffer 44, and the network interrupt handler 46 working with the Ethernet controller 12 sends it out to a destination on the network. The timing by which the network interrupt handler transmits either isochronous data from buffer 43 or asynchronous data from buffer 44 out over the network through the Ethernet controller is descπbed hereinafter with reference to FIG 9 FIG 2C shows the input and output data and signals for Ethernet controller 12 The initiate TX command or signal comes from the network interrupt handler and a TX complete interrupt goes back to the network interrupt handler when the transmission of a packet from the station is completed Controller 12 will buffer an initiate TX command until a TX complete occurs if the initiate TX command is received while the controller is already transmitting a packet Also, the Ethernet controller will send a RX complete interrupt to the network interrupt handler when the controller has completed the reception of a packet from another station As descπbed earlier with reference to FIG 2A, the node may operate in a timing mode where it is slaved to clock messages from the network or it may operate in a timing mode where it is the master and is generating clock messages to be sent out onto the network If the node is operating in the slave mode, the beat packet or timing message received through Ethernet controller 12 is processed at the network interrupt handler 46 and used to implement operations that lead to transmission of data from buffer 43 or buffer 44 out through Ethernet controller 12 At the same time, the timing message is passed by the network interrupt handler to the clock source selector 64 In slave mode, this source selector will pass the timing event to the phase detector 48 to lock the phase-lock-loop oscillator 66 to the beat of the network, I e , the timing signal represented by the beat packet If the node is operating as a master or conductor station and is the source of the beat packet, then timing pulses from oscillator 66 in this phase-lock-loop are passed back to the network interrupt handler 46 Interrupt handler 46, when it detects the clock pulse event from oscillator 66, sends out the beat packet message through the Ethernet controller 12 The beat packet message is generated by conductor 56 and stored in buffer 45 The beat packet that is transmitted is shown in FIG 3 As shown in FIG 3, the beat packet begins with two bytes for a frame number The frame number is advanced by one, each time the beat packet is transmitted Accordingly, since the beat packet is transmitted on the timing event of the clock master pulse, the frame number indicates network time The third byte (#2) in the beat packet identifies the packet as being the beat packet rather than another type of packet The next byte in the beat packet is a version field to indicate to users of the network the version of the protocol that is currently operating Next, are four bytes, 32 more bits of the frame number Altogether, there are 48 bits or six bytes making up the frame number The next four bytes indicate the frame period Bytes #12 and #13 contain the maximum allowed number of packets per frame Byte # 14 contains the isochronous (iso) channel count The remaining bytes contain the isochronous (iso) permissions list described hereinafter The ordered persistent (OP) timer 20 in FIGS 1 and 2B is shown in detail in FIG 4 The OP timer is monitoring the traffic on the network as seen bv the node In other words, any packet transmitted onto the network by any other node in the network is received at the node and will be seen by the OP timer 20 Traffic detector 72 in FIG 4 monitors this traffic and generates a binary one as it's output, if traffic is present, and a binary zero if no traffic is present Each time there is a transition from active (traffic) to idle (no traffic) or idle to active, transition detector 74 produces a pulse This pulse is passed by OR 76 to the reset input of timer 78 Timer 78 is reset every time there is a transition from active to idle or idle to active Also, timer 78 is reset and held reset in the event a disable input is received from the node processor 16 (FIG 2A) over input line 80 Timer 78 is incremented by clock pulses from the Ethernet controller 12 The Ethernet controller clock runs asynchronous to the node clock The controller clock generates a clock pulse that defines the period of a bit in the Ethernet packet Accordingly, timer 78 advances one tick for each Ethernet bit period Comparator 82 compares the value in timer 78 with a value received through switch 84 Switch 84 passes either a set value from the propagation slot register 86, or a selectable deferral value received from the node processor 16 (FIG 2A) Control line 88 which carries the active or idle signal from traffic detector 72 controls which value is passed by switch 84 to comparator 82 When the control line indicates the network is active, i e , an Ethernet packet is being transmitted by some station, switch 84 passes a fixed value, five hundred twelve (512 bit periods is the minimum size of a packet) from register 86 to comparator 82 When the control line is carrying an idle signal, switch 84 passes the deferral value from the node processor The output of comparator 82 has two purposes First, comparator 82 will generate an event output, an interrupt, if the size of an Ethernet packet is at least 512 bits Since timer 78 is reset to zero at the beginning of a packet and switch 84 is set to pass the value from the propagation slot register 86 during a packet comparator 82 will have an output when the value from timer 78 reaches 512 The output from comparator 82 is passed as an interrupt back to the node processor 16, and also sets latch 90 to the current state, active or idle, of the signal from traffic detector 72 In this way, node processor 16 can detect from latch 90 the state of traffic on the network from the active or idle signal at the time an event occurs I e at the time the interrupt signal occurs In the present example where the traffic is active, latch 90 is set active The minimum size for a packet is 512 bits Therefore, if a minimum size packet is being received, the traffic signal from traffic detector 72 could be transitioning from active to idle when comparator 82 detects the timer count has reached 512 For this reason, the traffic signal input to latch 90 is slightly delayed (less than a bit period) to make sure the traffic signal is still active when the interrupt from comparator 82 sets latch 90 while detecting a packet is on the network Traffic detector 72 in the OP timer also monitors traffic on the network for the puφose of detecting when the network is idle, I e , no station is currently transmitting In that situation, the traffic signal from traffic detector 72 goes low indicating the idle state Transition detector 74 detects this transition of the traffic signal, and resets timer 78 through OR 76 And the idle state of the traffic signal also controls switch 84 to pass the deferral value rather than the propagation slot value The deferral value is received from the node processor 16 (FIG 2A) The deferral value is set to one of a plurality of values depending on conditions on the network and at the local node as will be described hereinafter In any event with switch 84 now passing the deferral value to comparator 82, the comparator generates an interrupt signal when the timer value in timer 78 equals the deferral value The interrupt event now represents a predefined amount of idle time on the network, as defined by the deferral value Latch 90 is set to idle, i e the current state of the traffic signal, by the interrupt signal from comparator 82 This idle state is read from latch 90 by the node control processor 16 to detect the network is idle More particularly, the setting of latch 90 to the idle state indicates to the node processor 16 that the traffic on the network has been idle for the length of time equivalent to the deferral value. The purpose of the deferral values in the ordered persistent timer circuit of FIG 4 is to set the order in which the node expects to gain access to the network Highest priority node would have a deferral value of zero, and with increasing deferral values the order of access of each node is specified This is illustrated more particularly in the timing diagram of FIG 9 described later herein The network interrupt handler 46 of FIG. 2B is shown in detail in FIGS 5, composed of FIGS 5A and 5B, 6, and 7 FIG 5 illustrates the logical operations of the network interrupt handler in response to interrupts from the Ethernet controller 12 FIG 6 illustrates the operations of the network interrupt handler 46 in response to interrupts from the order persistent timer 20 FIG 7, composed of FIG 7A and 7B, illustrates the transmission schedule operations which are used to control or schedule transmissions in response to logical operations completed in FIGS 5 and 6 ln FIG 5, the network interrupt handler can respond to three interrupts from the Ethernet controller ~ transmission complete, receipt complete, or error When the interrupt is received in FIG 5, decision operation 100 checks for transmission complete, and decision operation 102 checks for receipt of an Ethernet packet being complete If both of these test operations result in a Ano@ result, then the interrupt must be for an error condition, and operation 104 logs the error The interrupt handler then expects an RX (receive) interrupt Interrupt handlers are only invoked when an event occurs When the interrupt handler completes, the processor resumes what it was doing when the event occurred. The termination points in the operation flows shown herein indicate the next normally expected event This may or may not be the actual next event If the Ethernet controller interrupt corresponds to completion of a transmission of an Ethernet packet, the logical operation flow branches yes from decision operation 100 to decision operation 106 Decision operation 106 is testing whether or not the transmitted Ethernet packet was an isochronous channel transmission If it was an isochronous channel transmission, then the operation flow branches Ayes@ to schedule the next transmission The scheduling of transmissions is handled in FIG 7 descπbed hereinafter If the transmission complete interrupt was not an isochronous channel transmission, then the operation flow branches Ano@ from decision operation 106 to decision operation 108 A non-isochronous channel transmission means that transmission of an asynchronous Ethernet packet has taken place Decision operation 108 is testing whether a collision occurred during that transmission As will be described hereinafter, the control of asynchronous transmission is adaptive P- persistent control Since the asynchronous transmission is not under ordered persistent control, it is possible that collisions will occur Depending on whether a collision occurred during asynchronous transmission, the P variable will be increased or decreased If there was no collision, P is increased If there was a collision, P is decreased The quotient 1/P represents an estimate of the number ot stations on the network that are attempting to transmit simultaneously during the asynchronous portion ofthe frame After P is increased or decreased, the operation flow proceeds to FIG 7 to schedule the next transmission If the interrupt from the Ethernet controller represents completion of the receipt of an Ethernet packet, the operation flow passes to decision operation 1 14 There are three possible Ethernet packets An isochronous packet, an asynchronous channel packet and a beat packet FIG 8 illustrates the format of a network frame in a preferred embodiment of the invention The frame begins with a beat packet 1 16 The beat packet is followed by a plurality of isochronous data packets 1 18 The isochronous data packets are followed by asynchronous data packets 120, and the asynchronous data packets are followed by an idle network test peπod 122 Returning to FIG 5, if decision operation 1 14 detects that an isochronous data packet has been received, then the operation flow branches to decision operation 124 Decision operation 124 is testing whether or not the isochronous data packet has an address that the node has been configured to receive If the address matches, queuing module 126 queues the isochronous data packet into the isochronous FIFO buffer 41 (FIG 2B) On the other hand, if there is no channel address match, then the isochronous data packet is discarded by operation 128 In either case, after the isochronous data packet is queued or discarded, the network interrupt handler 46 then expects the next RX interrupt ln the event the Ethernet packet received is not an isochronous data packet, decision 1 14 branches the operation flow to decision operation 130 Decision operation 130 is testing whether the packet that is not an isochronous data packet is a beat packet If the data packet is not a beat packet, it must be an asynchronous data packet In that event, the operation flow branches Ano@ from decision operation 130 to queue module 132 Queue module 132 queues the asynchronous data packet in FIFO buffer 42 (FIG 2B) If the data packet is a beat packet, then decision operation 130 branches the operation flow to step 134 At step 134, if the node is a slave node, clock module 34 (FIG 2A) is advanced to the time indicated by the beat packet frame number Clear operation 136 then clears the frame traffic counter The frame traffic counter counts the number of Ethernet packets received since the last beat packet The count is reset to zero each time a beat packet is received After the local clock has been updated, the local isochronous data packets queued for transmission in FIFO 43 are checked against the local clock Each isochronous data packet carries a time stamp If the isochronous data packet is stale, i e the local clock has advanced past the time stamp in the isochronous data packet awaiting transmission, then the isochronous data packet is discarded from the FIFO queue 43 (FIG 2B) Discard module 138 carries out these operations of comparing the time stamp to the local clock and discarding stale isochronous data packets from queue 43 This completes the maintenance functions associated with receiving a beat packet After step 138, the operations for setting up the transmission of isochronous data packets begin Decision operation 140 checks to see if there is a transmission channel match between any entry in the permission list in the beat packet and the present node As shown in FIG 3, the beat packet contains a isochronous permission list starting at byte #15 in the beat packet The number of isochronous channels that will be transmitted in the frame is defined by the isochronous channel count stored at byte #14 in the beat packet Accordingly, the count in byte #14 indicates how many isochronous channel permissions will be listed in the list staπing at byte # 1 5 Each entry in the isochronous permission list is 6 bytes long The entry contains the intended destination address of transmissions for that channel Referring briefly again to FIG 2B, conductor 56 at the conductor station, builds the permission list, as hereinafter described, from reservation requests from other stations and from its own node control processor 16 When a channel has a message originating at a slave station, the slave station generates an Ethernet packet having a source address and a destination address plus the isochronous data This packet is stored in the FIFO 43 of the slave station awaiting transmission The slave station generates a reservation request from the supervisor 54 which is stored in the asynchronous data queue 44 When the slave station sends the reservation request from FIFO 44 over to the conductor station, the conductor 56 can then build the permission list in the next beat packet Returning now to FIG 5, the decision operation 140 is detecting whether or not there is a transmission channel match between the contents of an isochronous data packet in queue 42 and an entry on the permission list in the beat packet just received More particularly, decision 140 is looking for a match between the destination address in the packet at the head of TX queue 43, and the destination address in one of the entries of the permission list in the beat packet If there is a match, then operation 142 detects the position on the permission list, and sets the deferral value in accordance with the position on the permission list If there is no match, then operation 144 sets the deferral value to a maximum value The deferral value is equal to a deferral number, I e , the position on the permission list, multiplied by 512 FIG 9 is a timing diagram for an example of three nodes, or stations, operating in accordance with the invention The relative timing of packets in FIG 9 illustrate the relationship of channels, beat packets, isochronous data packets, asynchronous data packets and deferral values for multiple stations or nodes The beat packet permission list 147 contains four entries on the permission list specifying the sequence of transmission of isochronous data packets from the stations Station I is the conductor station and sends the beat packet with the permission list ln the beat packet permission list, station two has first position, station three which intends to transmit two channels has second and fourth positions, and station one has third position These positions on the permission list equate to a deferral number of zero for station two deferral numbers one and three for the two channels respectively at station three, and deferral number two for the channel at station number one To arrive at the deferral value, the deferral number is multiplied times 512 Thus, the deferral value for station two is zero, for station one is 1,024, and for the two channels at station three, 512 and 1,536, respectively As described earlier with reference to FIG 4, these deferral values control when the OP timer generates an interrupt under idle network conditions FIG 6 illustrates the operations in the network interrupt handler 46 (FIG 2B) in response to an event detected at the OP timer 20 (Fig 2B) When an OP timer interrupt is generated at OP timer 20, decision operation 146 detects whether the network was active or idle at the exact time of the event If the network is active, this indicates another channel or packet is being transmitted The operation flow branches Ayes@ in this event from decision 146 to schedule the next transmission using the transmission scheduling routine in FIG 7 If the network is idle, the operation flow branches from decision operation 146 to step 148 An idle condition detected at step 146 indicates the deferral value or interval has expired After the idle state is detected, step 148 disables the OP timer, and step 150 initiates the deferred transmission of a data packet marked in operation 162 or operation 174 of FIG 7 After the deferred transmission is initiated, the interrupt handler expects a transmission (TX) complete interrupt The transmission scheduling module in the network interrupt handler is shown in FIG 7 The scheduling module is called from either FIG 5 or FIG 6 The logical operations of the scheduling module begin at operation 152 which increments the frame traffic counter by one The frame traffic counter counts the number of packets transmitted on the network since the beginning ofthe frame, I e , since the receipt ofthe beat packet The frame traffic counter was reset or cleared in operation 136 (FIG 5) Traffic counter 152 is incremented each time the station in which the traffic counter is located transmits an Ethernet packet or each time the OP timer at the station detects transmission of a packet bv another station After the frame traffic counter is incremented, decision operation 154 detects whether the total number of packets counted for the frame exceeds a frame total as specified by the beat packet in the packets per frame at byte # 12 If decision step 154 detects that the total number of packets counted exceeds the frame total specified in the beat packet, then no further packets should be transmitted Accordingly, the operation flow branches Ayes@ from decision operation 154 to disable operation 156 Disable operation 156 disables the OP timer which effectively stops any further transmission of packets from the station If the frame traffic count does not exceed the frame total, then the operation flow branches from decision 154 to decision operation 158 Decision operation 158 is testing whether the isochronous data transmission FIFO 43 in FIG 2B is empty In other words, have all of the isochronous data packets from the station already been transmitted 7 If so, the operation flow branches from operation 158 to decision operation 160 Decision operation 160 is testing whether the asynchronous data transmission queue 44 is empty If all ofthe asynchronous data packets from the station have also already been transmitted, then the operation flow branches yes from decision operation 160 to step 156 to disable the OP timer The network interrupt handler then expects the next RX interrupt If there is an isochronous data packet queued for transmission in FIFO queue 43 (FIG 2B), then the operation flow branches Ano@ from decision operation 158 to mark operation 162 Operation 162 marks the deferred isochronous data packet at the top ofthe queue 43 for transmission Then, step 164 generates the current deferral number for the deferred isochronous data packet marked by step 162 The current deferral number is found by updating the packet's original deferral number The original deferral number is specified by the channel=s position, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, etc , in the iso permission list in the beat packet The current deferral number is equal to the original deferral number minus the count in the frame traffic counter Accordingly, if the original deferral number was three and the frame traffic counter is two, then the current deferral number is one When the current deferral number is determined, decision operation 166 tests whether the current deferral number is equal to zero If it is equal to zero, then step 168 disables OP timer This insures that the OP timer will not generate an interrupt during transmission Step 170 initiates the transmission of the marked isochronous data packet at the top of the queue 43 (FIG 2B) Thereafter, the network interrupt handler expects the TX complete interrupt If the deferral number does not equal zero as detected by decision operation 166, then the OP timer is set to the current deferral value as calculated by step 172 This is done by multiplying the current deferral number times 512 and passing the result as the deferral value to the OP timer After step 172 sets this deferral value to the OP timer, the network interrupt handler expects the next RX interrupt This completes the scheduling of an isochronous data packet transmission from a station If the isochronous data packet queue 43 is empty, then decision operation 160, as described above, checks the asynchronous data packet queue 44 If the asynchronous data packet queue 44 does contain a packet ready for transmission, the operation flow branches from decision operation 160 to step 174 ln step 174, the asynchronous data packet at the top of queue 44 is marked for transmission Decision operation 176 then tests whether the frame traffic counter value is greater than or equal to the isochronous channel count The isochronous channel count is provided in the beat packet and corresponds to the number of entries on the isochronous packet permission list, which is the number of expected isochronous channel packets to be transmitted during the frame If the count in the frame traffic counter is not greater than or equal to the isochronous channel count, then the operation flow branches Ano@ to set deferral module 178 Module 178 sets the deferral number to 2 + the isochronous channel count - the traffic count This deferral number will provide a deferral value high enough to essentially guarantee that the isochronous data packet transmissions for all channels will be completed before an asynchronous data packet is transmitted by this station If the count in the frame traffic counter is greater than or equal to the isochronous channel count then the operation flow branches Aves@ from decision 176 to decision operation 180 ln decision operation 180, logical operations 180, 182, and 184 implement a P persistent logical operation in an effort to schedule asynchronous data packet transmissions from one station channel at a time In decision module 180, a random number is generated and compared against a P value As discussed above, the P value represents the percentage or probability that another station will be transmitting By setting the deferral to a lower value, two, in step 184, the current station is going to transmit before stations setting a deferral number to a higher value, three, as in step 182 After the OP timer deferral is set to a higher value in step 182, the next expected event is an RX interrupt If the deferral value or number is set lower as in step 184, the network interrupt handler expects an OP timer interrupt This use of the OP timer to perform P persistent scheduling does not guarantee there will be no collisions in asynchronous transmissions In other words, the asynchronous transmissions are P persistent and not ordered persistent because ofthe manner in which the network interrupt handler works with the OP timer This completes the scheduling operations performed in the network interrupt handler 46 (FIG 2B) for the network side of the FIFO buffers 41-44 On the synchronous side of the FIFO buffers, the frame interrupt handler 52 performs the logical operations illustrated in FIG 10 In FIG 10, when a timer tick is received, operation 190 advances the local clock Recall that the timer tick is from a phase lock loop and will be either locked to a reference clock if the station is operating as the conductor, 1 e a master station, or will be locked to the network clock if the station is a slave station Operation 192 checks whether the time in the local clock matches the network time If the local time matches the network time, the process flows directly to queue module 196 In the frame interrupt handler, queue module 196 queues synchronous data from the synchronous I/O and audio/video processor 50 and loads that synchronous data into TX FIFO buffer 43 (FIG 2B) Accordingly, each time there is a timer tick, synchronous data is loaded into an isochronous packet on the TX FLFO buffer To handle received packets, operation 198 in the frame interrupt handler checks for stale isochronous data packets at the top of the queue in RX FIFO buffer 41 , i e , the next packet in queue 41 to be processed by the synchronous data processor 50 Operation 198 discards any stale data packet as it reaches the top of the RX queue This is accomplished by comparing the time stamp on the RX isochronous data packet at the top of the queue with the local clock time The RX packets are generally discarded only at start up when the network system is synchronizing itself After stale RX isochronous packets are discarded decision operation 200 tests whether there is isochronous data remaining in queue 41 If there is, the operation flow branches to operation 202 to buffer the received isochronous data packet in the synchronous I/O 68 (FIG 2B) until the destination synchronous I/O device is ready for the data If there is no queued isochronous data m buffer 41 , then step 204 buffers blank video and/or silence into synchronous I/O 68 ln either event, buffering by step 202 or buffering by step 204, the frame interrupt handler then expects the next timer tick FIG 1 1 illustrates the logical operations performed by conductor 56 (FIG 2B) in handling an asynchronous request As discussed earlier, the conductor generates the beat packet shown in FIG 3 The beat packet contains the permission list for transmission during a frame If a channel or station wishes to get on that permission list, it sends a reservation request to the conductor through the supervisor 54 in FIG 2B When a reservation request is received, decision operation 206 checks whether the channel is already reserved The reservation request contains the channel number, the priority ofthe channel, and the estimated bandwidth to be used by the channel If the request is for a channel that has already reserved a packet in the frame, then decision operation 206 branches yes to decision operation 208 Decision operation 208 is testing or looking for a zero bandwidth request for the channel A zero bandwidth request corresponds to turning off the channel If there is a zero bandwidth request detected, then the operation flow branches to step 210, and step 210 removes the channel from the iso permissions list in the beat packet After the channel is removed from the permission list, the request handler in the conductor is expecting the next reservation request If decision operation 208 detects the bandwidth requested was not zero, this indicates the channel was already reserved No new channel, or no additional packet for the channel is granted The operation flow branches "no", and the conductor expects the next reservation request If the decision operation 206 detects that the channel has not already been reserved, then decision operation 212 tests whether or not there is enough bandwidth for the new channel Operation 212 detects the ANetwork Exhausted Flag @ If the network was not detected to be exhausted, the flow branches to operation 214 Operation 214 inserts the channel into the iso permission list in the beat packet After the channel is inserted into the permission list, the operation flow returns to the conductor expecting the next reservation request If the network was detected to be exhausted, then the operation branches Ano,@ expecting the next reservation request As a result, the channel is not inserted into the permission FIG 12 illustrates additional operations performed by the frame interrupt handler 52 (Fig 2B) in response to a timer tick event The logical operations in FIG 12 begin with the receipt of a timer tick from the master clock at the station Since the conductor is setting the timing for the network, l e conductor is only operative in the conductor station or master station, it will be receiving from its own clock the network timing Thus, the timer tick is the trigger for the operations in FIG 12 The logical operations begin by incrementing the frame number field of the beat packet image in buffer 45 at step 216 After step 216 increments the frame number of the beat packet, decision operation 218 tests whether the network exhausted flag has been set The network exhausted flag is set by the operations in FIG 13 described hereinafter If the network exhausted flag is set. it indicates that the entire bandwidth of the network is in use If the network exhausted flag has not been set, then the operation branches Ano@ from decision operation 218 to decision operation 220 Decision operation 220 tests whether or not the asynchronous permissions (packets per frame) have reached a maximum value for the frame The number of packets in the frame should not exceed a reasonable maximum number of packets derived from the frame rate and the network bit rate This reasonable maximum number of packets is the maximum value used in the test performed by operation 220 If the operation flow branches Ano@ from both operation 218 and operation 220, there is more space for asynchronous packets in the frame Step 222 increments by one the packets per frame in the beat packet image in buffer 45 Thereafter, the operation flow returns to clear module 224 Likewise, if the network exhausted flag has been set, or if the flag was not set but the asynchronous permissions were maximized, the operation would flow to clear module 224 also Clear module 224 clears the network exhausted flag since the flag is only active for one frame Clearing the flag prepares the conductor to handle the next frame After the network exhausted flag is cleared, operation 226 sets the OP timer for the test peπod deferral After the end of a frame, there is a test period between frames, 1 e , before the next beat packet is transmitted Step 226 sets this test period deferral value for the OP timer 20 (Fig 2B) so that the OP timer can detect that the idle state is occurring during the test period or can detect a problem in that another station is transmitting during the test period The end of frame processing in FIG 12 concludes with operation 228 which sets the end of frame (EOF) flag FIG 13 illustrates additional operations performed by the network interrupt handler 46 (Fig 2B) during an OP timer event When an OP timer interrupt is received, decision operation 229 tests whether the EOF flag has been set If not, the operation flow expects the next OP timer interrupt If the EOF flag is detected, then decision operation 230 tests whether or not the network is active or idle An idle state is expected, as all stations should have finished transmissions before the end of frame If the network is active, the operation flow branches Ayes@ to step 232 to set the network exhausted flag In other words, a station on the network is still transmitting and the network is overcommitted If the network is idle as expected, then the operation flow branches to operation 234 to transmit the beat packet from buffer 45 thus beginning the next frame After the beat packet is transmitted, step 236 clears the EOF flag, and step 238 simulates receipt of the beat packet at the conductor station This is necessary since the beat packet is sent from the conductor station, and the conductor station needs also to act as if it had received the information in the beat packet After the receipt ofthe beat packet is simulated at the conductor station, the station enters the schedule transmission operation flow described above in FIG 7 If the network is active as detected in decision operation 230, the network exhausted flag is set at step 232, the next operation is decision operation 240 which tests whether or not the async permissions are minimized If the asynchronous permissions have already been minimized, meaning that network bandwidth exhaustion is being caused by isochronous channels filling up the frame, then the operation flow branches from decision operation 240 to remove module 242 Remove module 242 removes the lowest priority isochronous channel from the isochronous permission list After the iso channel is removed, the conductor expects the next OP timer interrupt If on the other hand the asynchronous permissions for transmission in the frame have not been minimized, the operation flow branches Ano@ from operation 240 to operation 244 Operation 244 decrements by one the packets per frame The operation flow then expect the next OP timer interrupt While the invention has been particularly shown and descπbed with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various other changes in the form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention What is claimed is

Claims: CLAIMS 1 In a communication network having a plurality of stations, media access control apparatus at each station for controlling the transmission of isochronous data in communication frames on the network, the communication frames having a portion of the frame allocated to isochronous data packets, said media access control apparatus in each station comprising a conductor building a timing packet for transmission with each frame, the timing packet containing a reservation list indicating the sequence ot transmission of isochronous data packets in the frame a frame interrupt handler converting input data to isochronous data packets for transmission from the station and for converting isochronous data packets received from other stations into output data, an ordered persistent timer responsive to the reservation list and generating an interrupt when an isochronous data packet at the station is to be scheduled for transmission, and a network interrupt handler in response to the reservation list in the timing packet and the interrupt for scheduling an isochronous data packet for transmission by the station whereby the order of transmission onto the network of isochronous data packets by stations on the network is controlled to avoid collisions 2 The media access control apparatus of claim 1 wherein said network interrupt handler operates with said ordered persistent timer to time a deferral time interval to generate the interrupt and thereby control transmission of an isochronous data packet by the station, said deferral time interval defining a time interval when other isochronous data packets in the communication frame are being transmitted on the network so that isochronous data packets from the plurality of stations do not collide 3 The media access control apparatus of 2 wherein said ordered persistent timer compπses a detector detecting traffic on the network and generating a first signal, and a deferral interval timer generating the interrupt in response to a deferral value based on a position of a request in the reservation list and in response to the first signal 4 The media access control apparatus of claim 1 and in addition synchronizing apparatus in each station for synchronizing synchronous input/output data at each station with network timing as defined by the timing packet, said synchronizing apparatus comprising a local clock locked to a timing packet clock rate provided by the timing packet, and said frame interrupt handler responsive to the local clock for converting synchronous input data synchronized with network timing to isochronous data packets for transmission from the station and for converting received isochronous data packets into synchronous output data synchronized with network timing 5 The media access control apparatus of claim 4 wherein said network interrupt handler operates with said ordered persistent timer to time a deferral time interval to generate the interrupt and thereby control transmission of an isochronous data packet by the station, said deferral time interval defining a time interval when other isochronous data packets in the communication frame are being transmitted on the network so that isochronous data packets from plurality of stations do not collide 6 The media access control apparatus of 5 wherein said ordered persistent time compπses a detector detecting traffic on the network and generating a first signal, and a deferral interval timer generating the interrupt in response to a deferral value based on a position of a request in the reservation list and in response to the first signal 7 In a communication network having a plurality of stations for transmitting and receiving communication frames, media access control apparatus at each station for controlling the transmission of isochronous data and asynchronous data in communication frames on the network, the communication frames having a portion of the frame allocated to isochronous data packets, a portion of the frame allocated to asynchronous data packets, and a timing packet containing a reservation list indicating the sequence of transmission of isochronous data packets in the frame, said media access control apparatus in each station comprising a frame interrupt handler converting input data to isochronous data packets for transmission from the station and for converting isochronous data packets received from other stations into output data, a timer in response to the reservation list timing a first time interval and generating a first interrupt when an isochronous data packet is to be transmitted by the station, said first time interval defining a scheduled time for transmission of the isochronous data packet from the station, and a network interrupt handler in response to the first interrupt releasing an isochronous data packet for transmission by the station whereby the order of transmission onto the network of isochronous data packets by stations on the network is controlled to avoid collisions 8 The media control apparatus of claim 7 and in addition said timer in response to a second time interval generating a second interrupt when an asynchronous data packet is scheduled for transmission by the station, said second time interval defining a time when transmission of isochronous data packets in the communication frame has been completed, and said network interrupt handler in response to the second interrupt releasing an asynchronous data packet for transmission by the station whereby the asynchronous data packet is transmitted after transmission of isochronous data packets in the communication frame has been completed 9 The media access control apparatus of claim 8 and in addition said timer operates as an ordered persistent timer during the timing of said first time interval and said second time interval and operates as an adaptive persistent timer after the timing of said second time interval 10 The media access control apparatus of claim 8 wherein said timer compπses a detector detecting traffic on the network and generating a traffic signal, and a deferral interval timer generating the first interrupt in response to the traffic signal and in response to a deferral value based on a position of a request in a plurality of requests in the reservation list, said deferral interval timer generates the second interrupt in response to the traffic signal and in response to a deferral value based on the plurality of requests in the reservation list 1 1 The media access control apparatus of 7 wherein said timer comprises a detector detecting traffic on the network and generating a traffic signal, and a deferral interval timer generating the first interrupt in response to the traffic signal and in response to a deferral value based on a position of a request in a plurality of requests in the reservation list 12 In a communication network having a plurality of stations, a media control system for synchronizing input/output data of each station with network timing and for controlling the transmission of isochronous data and asynchronous data in communication frames on the network, the communication frames having a first portion of the frame allocated to isochronous data packets and a second portion of the frame allocated to asynchronous data packets, said system comprising a conductor at a conductor station building one or more timing packets for transmission with each frame, the timing packets containing a reservation list indicating the sequence of and the number of isochronous data packet transmission requests for the frame, at least one station of said plurality of stations comprising a frame interrupt handler for converting input data to isochronous data packets for transmission from the station and for converting received isochronous data packets into output data, a supervisor converting control data into asynchronous data packets for transmission from the station and for converting received asynchronous data packets into output data, a timer timing an active state of the network, an active state indicating a present transmission of one or more isochronous data packets on the network, and a network interrupt handler operating with said timer and in response to the sequence of requests in the reservation l ist to control the sequence of transmission of the isochronous data packet from the station with other isochronous data packets transmitted on the network and in response to the number of requests in the reservation list to control the transmission of the asynchronous data packet from the station 1 3 The system of claim 1 2 wherein said timer times a deferral time based on the sequence of requests i n the reservation list to control transmission of a packet bv said station so that isochronous data packets from the plurality of stations are transmitted in sequence and do not collide 14 The system of claim 1 2 also synchronizing input/output data of each station with network timing and further comprising said conductor station transmitting the timing packet at a clock rate of a local clock at the conductor station, at least one station of said plurality of stations further comprising Λ local clock locked to an arrival time of said tim ing packet and said frame interrupt handler responsive to the local clock converting synchronous input data synchronized with the local clock to isochronous data packets and for converting received isochronous data packets into synchronous output data synchronized with the local clock 15 The system of claim 12 wherein said at least one station further comprises a memory buffer coupled to said network interrupt handler and said frame interrupt handler for storing therebetween said isochronous data packets and said asynchronous data packets 16 The system of claim 12, wherein said at least one station further comprises a controller, coupled to said timer and said network interrupt handler, for controlling the transmission and receipt of said isochronous data packets and said asynchronous data packets of the network 1 7 The system of claim 16, wherein said at least one station further comprises a transceiver, coupled to said timer and said controller, for transmitting and receiving said isochronous data packets and said asynchronous data packets to and from the network 18 In a communication network having a plurality of stations, media access control apparatus at each station for controlling the transmission and receipt of isochronous data and asynchronous data in communication frames on the network, the communication frames having a portion of the frame allocated to isochronous data packets and a portion of the frame allocated to asynchronous data packets, said media access control apparatus comprising a conductor building a timing packet for transmission with each frame, the timing packet containing a reservation list indicating sequence of transmission of isochronous data packets in the frame, an ordered persistent timer detecting an active state and an idle state of the network, the network being in the active state when a station is transmitting and being in the idle state when no station is transmitting, said ordered persistent timer timing deferral time intervals during the idle state and generating an interrupt to schedule transmission of a data packet by the station, said deferral time intervals based on the reservation list in the timing packet, and a network interrupt handler responsive to the interrupt to control the time of transmission of isochronous data packets and asynchronous data packets on said network whereby in a given frame isochronous data packets from a plurality of stations do not collide on the network and asynchronous data packets are transmitted to the extent there is space remaining in the frame 19 The media access control apparatus of claim 18 wherein said ordered persistent timer comprises a detector detecting transmission of data on the network to detect the active state and the idle state, an interval timer timing intervals in the active state and the idle state, said interval timer during the idle state timing a deferral time interval based on a position of a transmission request in the reservation list and generating an interrupt if the deferral time interval times out, and said detector resetting said interval timer before the deferral time interval times out if said detector detects a change from the idle state to the active state during the timing of the deferral time interval 20 The media access control apparatus of claim 19 wherein said network interrupt handler in response to the interrupt initiates transmission of an isochronous data packet on the network whereby the isochronous data packet transmitted from the station does not collide with another isochronous data packet 21 The media access control apparatus of claim 20 and in addition said timer timing a predefined interval of time during the active state and generating a update interrupt when the predefined interval times out, and said network interrupt handler in response to the update interrupt generating an updated deferral time interval for an isochronous data packet whose previous deferral time interval did not time out before said timer was reset 22 The media access control apparatus of claim 21 and in addition said timer during an idle state timing the updated deferral time interval and generating the interrupt if said updated deferral time interval times out before said detector detects the change to active state and resets said timer 23 The media access control apparatus of claim 18 wherein the reservation list indicates the number of isochronous data packets in the frame, the deferral time interval for an isochronous data packet is based on a position of a transmission request in the reservation list, the deferral time interval for transmission of an asynchronous data packet is based upon the number of isochronous data packets in the frame, and said ordered persistent timer comprises a detector detecting transmission of data on the network to detect the active state and the idle state, an interval timer timing intervals in the active state and the idle state, said interval timer during the idle state timing a deferral time interval and generating an interrupt if the deferral time interval times out, said detector resetting said timer before the deferral time interval times out if said detector indicates a transition to an active state during the deferral time interval 24 The media access control apparatus of claim 23 and in addition said network interrupt handler in response to the interrupt initiates transmission of a data packet on the network 25 The media access control apparatus of claim 24 and in addition said interval timer timing a predefined interval of time during the active state and generating an update interrupt when the predefined interval times out, and said network interrupt handler in response to the update interrupt generating an updated deferral time interval for a data packet whose previous deferral time interval did not time out before said timer was reset 26 The media access control apparatus of claim 25 and in addition said interval timer during an idle state timing the updated deferral time interval and generating the interrupt if said updated deferral time interval times out before said detector detects the change to active state and resets said timer

Inventors: ANDERSON CHARLES WILLIAM, GROSS KEVIN PAUL, LIEB DEREK WEARIN, LOWE WILLIAM WARREN, ROSENBOOM GERRIT EIMBERTUS, ANDERSON, CHARLES, WILLIAM, GROSS, KEVIN, PAUL, LIEB, DEREK, WEARIN, LOWE, WILLIAM, WARREN, ROSENBOOM, GERRIT, EIMBERTUS
Applicants: PEAK AUDIO INC, PEAK AUDIO, INCORPORATED
Application year: 1997
Main classification: H04L12
IPC codes: H04L12, H04Q11