Nitrogen oxide trap for an internal combustion engine

Abstract: The invention is a nitrogen oxide trap comprising a porous support loaded with 6 -15 wt.% strontium oxide and thereon, a mixture of: 0.5-5 wt.% precious metal catalyst selected from platinum, palladium, rhodium or mixtures thereof loaded, 3.5-15 wt.% zirconium and 15-30wt.% sulphate, where preferably the ratio of zirconium to sulphate ranges from about 1:1 to 1:7; each wt.% being individually based on the weight of the support. The trap may be used in an internal combustion engine exhaust gas catalyst system. During lean-burn operation of the engine the trap sorbs nitrogen oxides (NO x ) and releases the nitrogen oxides during decreased oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas, the desorbed NO x being converted to N 2 and O 2 .

Description: This invention relates to nitrogen oxide traps employed in the exhaust system of an internal combustion engine to absorb nitrogen oxides during lean-burn operation. Catalysts are employed in the exhaust systems of automotive vehicles to convert carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides (NO x ) produced during engine operation into more desirable gases. When the engine is operated in a stoichiometric or slightly rich air/fuel ratio, i.e., between about 14.7 and 14.4 catalysts containing palladium, platinum and rhodium, or palladium and rhodium are able to efficiently convert all three gases simultaneously. Hence, such catalysts are often called "three-way" catalysts. It is desirable to operate the engine under "lean-burn" conditions where the A/F ratio is greater than 14.7, generally between 19 and 27, to realise a benefit in fuel economy. Such three-way catalysts are able to convert carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons but are not efficient in the reduction of NO x during lean-burn (excess oxygen) operation. One approach for treating NO x in exhausts from lean-burn engines which is currently receiving considerable attention involves the use of so-called NO x traps which generally include platinum and an alkali or alkaline earth metal. As disclosed in U.S. Patent 5,402,641 to Katoh et al, the widely held mechanism for this adsorption phenomena is that the platinum first oxidises NO to NO 2 and the NO 2 subsequently forms a nitrate complex with the other material, e.g., potassium or strontium. In a stoichiometric or rich environment, the nitrate is thermodynamically unstable, and the stored NO x is released. NO x then catalytically reacts with reducing species in the exhaust gas to form N 2 . Generally, NO x traps are prepared by impregnating both the platinum and the other material like potassium onto a porous carrier, e.g., alumina. While such NO x traps possessed adequate trapping efficiency, they had the serious drawback that they are very susceptible to sulphur poisoning. Most fuels for automotive vehicles contain sulphur and when burnt, the sulphur is converted to sulphur compounds like SO 2 . Over time, the sulphur compounds react with trap materials like potassium forming sulphates which will not revert back to the sorption material. These sulphates are inactive for NO x sorption. As a result, the typical NO x trap is strongly deactivated by fuel sulphur. We have unexpectedly found that a novel composition for NO x traps which displays both enhanced NO x sorption efficiency and resistance to sulphur poisoning. This invention is directed to a nitrogen oxide (NO x ) trap useful to trap nitrogen oxides during the lean-burn operation of an internal combustion engine. The NO x trap comprises: a porous support first loaded with 6 -15 wt.% strontium oxide and then loaded with: (a) 0.5 - 5 wt.% precious metal selected from platinum, palladium, rhodium or mixtures thereof; (b) 3.5-15 wt.% zirconium; and (c) 15-30 wt.% sulphate;, the components (a), (b) and (c) being loaded together onto the strontium oxide loaded support, all weight percents being individually based on the weight of the support. Preferably, the ratio of zirconium to sulphate is between about 1:1 to 1:7. One convenient way to load the precious metal, zirconium and sulphate together onto the strontium oxide loaded support is from a soluble mixture of their precursors. According to another aspect of the invention, it comprises an internal combustion engine exhaust gas catalyst system comprising the disclosed NO x trap. The engine may be a gasoline engine or a diesel engine. The trap is arranged in the exhaust system and absorbs NO x when the air/fuel ratio of exhaust gas flowing into said trap is lean and releases the absorbed NO x when the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas is lowered, as during stoichiometric or rich operation of the engine. Advantageously, it has been found that including zirconia in the present invention formulation with strontium oxide and precious metal, in a particular method of manufacture, significantly increases the NOx absorption efficiency. Moreover, addition of sulphate to the above disclosed formulation further enhances the NOx absorption efficiency, and, more importantly, the resistance of the NOx adsorbing material to sulphur. That is, we believe that this allows the strontium oxide to remain available to sorb NOx and that it is much less susceptible to sulphur poisoning than in conventional NO x traps where strontium and precious metal like platinum are only employed. The invention will now be described further, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Fig 1 is a graph showing the effect of zirconia and sulphate on the NO x sorption efficiency, (a) being a comparative NO x trap while (b) and (c) are embodiments of the present invention, Fig. 2 is a graph showing the effect of zirconia placement on NO x sorption efficiency, (b) being a comparative example not according to the present invention, and Fig. 3 is a temperature profile graph showing the effect of exposure to sulphur of a NO x trap material according to an embodiment of the present invention. This invention, according to one aspect, is directed to an internal combustion engine exhaust gas catalyst system comprising a nitrogen oxide trap. The NO x trap comprises a porous support impregnated with various materials, in a particular order. That is, the support must first be loaded with strontium in its oxide form, as by providing a strontium compound which is then converted to its oxide by calcination in oxygen. Thereafter, this support is provided with : precious metal, zirconium and sulphate. Further detail is provided in the following discussion. The preferred (and most preferred being in parenthesis) weight percent ranges for each of these materials based on the weight of the support material are as follows: strontium oxide 9-15 wt.% (10-13 wt.%); precious metals 0.8-3.5 wt.% (1.5-2.5 wt.%); zirconium 3.5-11 wt.% (6-9 wt.%); and acidic sulphate 18-27 wt.% (20.5-25 wt.%) . The zirconium to sulphate weight ratio (i.e., the ratio of the weights of each of these materials) can range from about 1:1 to 1:7, with the most preferred ratio at about 1:3. The precious metals may be a mixture of precious metals. Optimally, if a mixture of precious metals is employed, it comprises platinum and rhodium most preferably in a weight ratio of about 5:1. The porous support (washcoat) material loaded with the catalysts is preferably a high surface area washcoat material like alumina, preferably being at least SQ wt.% gamma-alumina. Most preferably, it is 100% gamma-alumina. Still other washcoat materials which may be used at the high operation temperatures associated with an internal combustion engine exhaust system include, but are not limited to, zeolite, ceria, and zirconia. Such washcoat materials, useful for carrying catalyst materials, are well known to those skilled in the art. The choice of the particular porous support (washcoat) material is not critical to this invention. Desirably, the support material has a surface area between about 5 and 300 m 2 /g. For useful application in an exhaust gas system for example gasoline or diesel engines, the washcoat will be carried on a substrate of a high temperature stable, electrically insulating material. Typical of such substrate materials are cordierite, mullite, etc. The substrate may be in any suitable configuration, often being employed as a monolithic honeycomb structure, spun fibres, corrugated foils or layered materials. Still other materials and configurations useful in this invention and suitable in an exhaust gas system will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the present disclosure. The support material like alumina may be applied to the substrate first and then the other materials loaded thereon or the materials may be loaded on the support material and then this product loaded on a substrate, in a manner which would be readily apparent to those skilled in the art of catalyst manufacture. Preferably, the support material (washcoat) is first applied to the substrate as a slurry which is then dried and calcined. Then the strontium oxide is provided on the support, and subsequently the precious metal, zirconium, and sulphate are provided together, preferably from a mixture of their soluble salts, onto the strontium oxide/support. As seen from Example 1 and Fig. 2, the zirconium must be provided onto the strontium oxide/support only in mixture along with the precious metal and sulphate and not separately onto the support in order to provided the unexpected properties of the present invention. That is, as is shown from the figures, the zirconium must be kept separate from the strontium oxide phase to achieve the unexpected NO x sorption improvement and sulphur tolerance of the present invention. One method useful to conveniently provide the strontium oxide on the support involves impregnating the support, e.g., alumina, with a solution of a soluble salt of strontium, e.g., a salt like strontium nitrate in an aqueous or organic solvent solution. Examples of other soluble precursors for strontium include, but are not limited to, strontium chloride and strontium carbonate. After impregnating with the strontium oxide precursor, the support is generally dried at about 90°C for several hours and then calcined at about 550°C for several hours. Drying and calcination of the impregnated strontium oxide precursor material in the presence of oxygen (e.g., air) converts the precursor to its oxide. It was found critical to this invention that the strontium on the support be converted to strontium oxide before the mixture of the other materials is loaded onto the support. The particular parameters of the drying and calcination steps are not critical to the invention and selection of optimal times and temperatures would be within the skill of those in the art in view of the disclosure. The other materials, i.e., precious metals, zirconium and sulphate can then be deposited on the strontium oxide/support, as by the impregnation techniques described above and well known to those skilled in the art. According to such techniques, a mixture of the precursors of zirconium, precious metal, and sulphate is impregnated onto the strontium oxide/support after which drying and calcination takes place. Calcination is heating at elevated temperatures generally in the presence of oxygen. The zirconium and sulphate are expected to be present mostly as zirconium sulphate since sulphate reacts with the zirconium. Sulphate is significantly more chemically reactive with zirconium ions in the solution than it is with the aluminium of calcined alumina. Hence, at most a very small amount of the sulphate may react with aluminium to form aluminium sulphate. In like manner, strontium exists as calcined strontium oxide and is present in a much smaller amount compared to alumina, and thus little or no reaction between strontium and sulphate is expected. Evidence of this is confirmed by Fig. 3 where essentially no loss in NO x sorption efficiency is observed after 500 hours of exposure to a simulated exhaust stream containing sulphur dioxide. The strontium oxide is known to be the component which sorbs the NO x . Examples of soluble precursors for precious metals include, but are not limited to, dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate, ammonium chloroplatinate, and platinum chloride. Examples of soluble precursors for zirconium include, but are not limited to, zirconium chloride, zirconium nitrate, and zirconium carbonate. The acidic sulphate precursor, includes but is not limited to, sulphuric acid, sulphur dioxide (gas) and sulphuryl chloride. The particular precursor salt employed as well as the solvent is not critical to this invention. Other precursor materials which may be used would be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the present disclosure. According to the invention, these materials are loaded on the support in particular amounts, detailed above. The inclusion of sulphate along with the zirconium in the precursor mixture applied to the strontium oxide/support so that zirconium sulphate can be formed is critical to the invention. We have found that the zirconium sulphate further enhances the NO x trap sorption efficiency and most critically, enhances the resistance of the strontium oxide of the trap material to sulphur poisoning. The internal combustion engine catalyst system of this invention may include another catalyst device as, for example, a catalytic converter employing a conventional three-way catalyst containing palladium, etc. The three-way catalyst can be placed upstream of the NO x trap, hence closer to the engine. In such an arrangement, the three-way catalyst being closely mounted to the engine would warm up quickly and provide for efficient engine cold start emission control. Once the engine is warmed up, the three-way catalyst will remove hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxides from the exhaust during stoichiometric operation and hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide during lean operation. The NO x trap would be positioned downstream of the three-way catalyst where the exhaust gas temperature enables maximum NO x trap efficiency. Also, with the NO x trap positioned downstream of the three-way catalyst in a remote location, it is protected against very high exhaust gas temperatures which could damage it. During periods of lean-burn engine operation when NO x passes through the three-way catalyst, NO~ is stored on the trap. The NO x trap is periodically regenerated by short periods or intervals of slightly rich engine operation. The stored NO x is then released from the alkali metal trapping material and is catalytically reduced over the platinum by the excess CO, H 2 and HCs present in the exhaust. However, one may wish to place a second three way catalyst downstream of the NO x trap in order to further aid in this regard. This invention catalyst has particular utility when used with lean-burn engines. Lean-burn engines are those which at least during part of their operation operate with air/fuel ratios containing excess oxygen relative to the stoichiometric ratio. For gasoline engines that range is usually 19-27 and for diesel the range is usually 19-40. As shown by means of the following examples and the figures herein, the use of the strontium oxide, precious metal, zirconium and acidic sulphate particularly in this relationship of contact to one another provides the superior resistance to sulphur poisoning and enhanced NO x absorption. While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that this superiority is due to an increase in NO x adsorption-site density resulting from the interactions between platinum, alumina, zirconia and acidic sulphate. In particular, it is believed that the resistance to sulphur poisoning of the invention trap material is the result of the specific NO x trap preparation method. That is, this preparation, with strontium oxide prepared first and the precious metal, zirconium and acidic sulphate added onto the strontium oxide formulation later, we believe favours the formation of stable zirconium and aluminium sulphates. Hence, further sulphation of the trap from sulphur, which may be present in the exhaust gas, will not be thermodynamically favourable. This, we believe, allows the strontium oxide to remain available to act as the NO x trapping material. Thus, this formulation enhances rather than deactivates the NOx sorption efficiency. Neither the validity nor understanding of this theory is however necessary for the practice of this invention. It was clearly found, however, that no significant loss of NO x trapping efficiency with the invention traps was observed when exposed to sulphur. This was unexpected since prior art NO x trap formulations including only precious metal and materials like potassium or strontium were very susceptible to poisoning by sulphur. Example 1 A nitrogen oxide trap according to an embodiment of the present invention is prepared as follows. Gamma-alumina (100m 2 /g) is ball milled and mixed with distilled water to produce a slurry. The slurry is applied to a cordierite monolith (400 cells/in 2 ) to obtain a 30 wt.% loading of the alumina. The monolith is subsequently dried at 120°C to remove the water and calcined in air at 500°C for 6 hours. The alumina-coated monolith is first impregnated with an aqueous solution containing strontium nitrate adjusted so as to provide 12 wt.% strontium oxide on the alumina washcoat. Following impregnation with the solution, the alumina is dried at 90°C for 5 hours to remove the water and then calcined at 550°C for 5 hours which converts the strontium to strontium oxide. The strontium oxide/alumina washcoat is then impregnated with an aqueous solution containing three materials: dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate, zirconium chloride, and sulphuric acid (adjusted so as to provide 1 wt.% Pt / 7 wt.% Zr / 23 wt.% sulphate on this. washcoat). The subsequent NO x trap is then oven dried and calcined as above. The NO x sorption efficiency of the invention embodiment (Fig. 1(c)) is seen to be significantly increased over that of the Fig. 1 comparative traps (a) and (b) made as described in Example 2 below. In order to test the NO x sorption efficiency of the invention trap embodiment made above when subjected to SO 2 , the strontium oxide/platinum/zirconium/acidic sulphate trap was subjected to a simulated exhaust gas containing: 1000 ppm NO, 10% CO 2 , 10% H 2 O, 0.1% CO, 0.03% H 2 , 50 ppm C 3 H 6 , 20 ppm SO 2 and 6% O 2 . The total exhaust gas flow rate was 3 litre/mm and the space velocity was 20,000hr -1 . It can be seen from Fig. 3 that essentially no loss of NO x trapping efficiency is observed after 500 hours of exposure to this simulated exhaust stream. This was unexpected since, as discussed above, earlier generation NO x traps became severely deactivated after exposure to sulphur. Example 2 Three other NO x trap formulations were made generally following the procedure described in Example 1, except that they are comparative examples (not according to the present invention). In each case, strontium oxide/alumina was made as in Example 1. In the first formulation, the strontium oxide/alumina washcoat is impregnated with a solution containing dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate (adjusted so as to provide 1 w% Pt on this washcoat). In the second case, the strontium oxide/alumina washcoat is impregnated with a solution containing a mixture of dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate and zirconium chloride (adjusted so as to provide 1 wt.% Pt / 7 wt.% Zr on this washcoat). These two nitrogen oxide traps were dried and calcined as described above. Finally, in a third case a washcoat is prepared in which the strontium oxide/alumina washcoat is impregnated with a solution containing only zirconium chloride (adjusted so as to provide 3.5 wt.% Zr on the washcoat), dried and calcined as described above. This strontium Oxide/zirconium/alumina washcoat is then impregnated with a solution containing dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate and zirconium chloride (adjusted so as to provide 1 wt.% Pt / 3.5 wt.% Zr on this washcoat), dried and calcined as described above. The NO x trapping efficiencies of these comparative NO x traps are shown in Figures 1 and 2. In particular, the NO x absorption for the first comparative formulation is shown in Fig. 1(a) and that of the second comparative is shown in Fig. 1(b), while the third formulation is shown in Fig. 2(A). As discussed in Example 1, from Fig. 1 it can be seen that the NO x sorption, within the desired application temperature range of about 250-400°, significantly increases in the present invention embodiment trap which includes zirconium, platinum, sulphate. From Fig. 2 is can be seen that placement of the zirconium separate from the strontium oxide is necessary to the present invention. Example 3 An alumina-coated monolith is prepared according to the previous example and impregnated with an aqueous solution containing strontium nitrate adjusted so as to provide for 6 wt.% strontium oxide on the alumina washcoat. Following impregnation, the monolith is dried at 90°C for 5 hours and then calcined at 550°C for 5 hours. The resulting product is then impregnated with an aqueous solution containing dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate, zirconium chloride and sulphuric acid, dried, and calcined as above. The concentration of dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate, zirconium chloride, and sulphuric acid are adjusted so as to provide for 1 wt.% Pt, 7 wt.% Zr and 23 wt.% sulphate on the strontium oxide/alumina washcoat. Exposure of the present invention embodiment trap to a simulated exhaust gas containing sulphur shows that the NO x is efficiently trapped by the catalyst and most importantly, this NO x trap formulation provides excellent resistance to sulphur poisoning. Example 4 An alumina coated monolith is prepared according to the previous example and impregnated with an aqueous solution containing strontium nitrate adjusted so as to provide for 12 wt.% strontium oxide on the alumina washcoat. Following impregnation, the monolith was dried at 90°C for 5 hours and then calcined at 550°C for 5 hours. The resulting product is then impregnated with an aqueous solution containing dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate and zirconium chloride; the concentration of dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate and zirconium chloride are adjusted so as to provide 1.0 wt.% of platinum and 11 wt.% zirconium on the strontium oxide/alumina washcoat. The monolith is then dried and calcined as before. Although this is a comparative example not according to the present invention, the use of zirconium with the platinum is shown to increase the NO x trapping efficiency of the catalyst. Example 5 An alumina coated monolith is prepared according to the previous example and impregnated with an aqueous solution containing strontium nitrate adjusted so as to provide for 12 wt.% strontium oxide on the alumina washcoat. Following impregnation, the monolith is dried at 90°C for 5 hours and then calcined at 550°C for five hours. The resulting product is then impregnated with an aqueous solution containing dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate, zirconium chloride and sulphuric acid. The concentration of dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate, zirconium chloride, and sulphuric acid are adjusted so as to provide for 1 wt.% Pt, 7 wt.% Zr and 10% sulphate on the strontium oxide/alumina washcoat. The monolith is then dried and calcined as above. Testing in a simulated exhaust gas containing sulphur shows that the NO x is efficiently trapped by the present invention embodiment NO x catalyst. More importantly, this NO x trap formulation displays excellent resistance to sulphur poisoning. Example 6 An alumina coated monolith is prepared according to the previous example and impregnated with an aqueous solution containing strontium nitrate adjusted as to provide 12 wt.% strontium oxide on the alumina washcoat. Following impregnation the washcoat is dried and calcined as described above. The strontium oxide/alumina washcoat is then impregnated with a solution containing dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate and zirconium chloride; the concentrations are adjusted so as to provide for 4 wt.% platinum and 7 wt.% Zr on the strontium oxide/alumina washcoat. Following impregnation, the monolith is dried at 90°C for 5 hours and then calcined at 550°C for 5 hours. Exposure to a simulated exhaust gas stream shows that the comparative example NO x trap has improved NO x trapping efficiency over that of platinum alone.

Claims: A nitrogen oxide trap useful for trapping nitrogen oxide present in the exhaust gases generated during lean-burn operation of an internal combustion engine and releasing said absorbed nitrogen oxides when the oxygen concentration of the exhaust gases is lowered, said trap comprising: a porous support loaded with 6 -15 wt.% strontium oxide; and (a) 0.5 - 5 wt.% precious metal selected from platinum, palladium, rhodium and mixtures thereof; (b) 3.5-15 wt.% zirconium; and (c) 15 - 30wt.% acidic sulphate, the components (a), (b) and (c) being loaded together onto the strontium oxide loaded support, each wt.% being individually based on the weight of the support. A nitrogen oxide trap according to claim 1, wherein said support comprises alumina. A nitrogen oxide trap according to claim 2, wherein said alumina comprises at least 50% gamma-alumina. A nitrogen oxide trap according to claim 1, wherein strontium oxide is provided on said support by impregnation from a soluble salt of strontium and subsequently calcination of the impregnated support in the presence of oxygen. A nitrogen oxide trap according to claim 1, wherein (a), (b) and (c) are provided on the strontium oxide loaded support by impregnation from a solution of a mixture of soluble precursors of zirconium, precious metal and sulphate compounds. A nitrogen oxide trap according to claim 5, wherein said (a), (b), and (c) are provided on said strontium oxide loaded support by impregnation from a solution of at least one of each of: (i) soluble acid or acid salt of said precious metal, (ii) soluble salt of zirconium; and (iii) sulphuric acid, soluble sulphate salts, and compounds containing sulphur and oxygen. A nitrogen oxide trap according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the weight ratio of zirconium to sulphate is about 1:1 to 1:7. A nitrogen oxide trap according to claim 7, wherein the weight ratio of zirconium to sulphate is about 1:3. An internal combustion engine exhaust gas catalyst system comprising a nitrogen oxide trap as claimed in any one of the preceding claims.

Inventors: DOBSON DOUGLAS A, HUBBARD CAROLYN PARKS, WATKINS WILLIAM LEWIS HENDERSO, DOBSON, DOUGLAS A., HUBBARD, CAROLYN PARKS, WATKINS, WILLIAM LEWIS HENDERSON
Applicants: FORD GLOBAL TECH INC, FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Application year: 1997
Main classification: B01D53
IPC codes: B01J23, B01J27, B01J20, B01D53