INSTRUMENT BRACKET WITH RESILIENT LOCKING MEANS FOR USE WITH A STERILIZABLE TRAY

Abstract: A sterilizable bracket (10) for supporting medical instruments (22) includes a resilient body (12) that surrounds and encapsulates a relatively rigid metal skeleton (14) which is attached to a plurality of studs (16) which secure the bracket (10) to a sterilizable tray (18). The instruments (22) are received in indentations (24) in the resilient body (12). Each indentation (24) includes a plurality of ribs or fingers (28) which permits sterilizing steam to flow around the instruments (22). The resilient body (12) comprises a silicone material which encapsulates the skeleton backbone (14) which, in turn, gives the bracket (10) strength and flexibility. Threaded studs (16) having a slot (46) at one end and threads (50) at the other are employed to attach the bracket (10) to the sterilizable tray (18). The slot (46) in the head (44) of each of the studs (16) receives the metal skeleton backbone (14). Lock nuts (52) or the like are employed to secure the threaded portions (50) of the studs (16) in regularly spaced perforations (20) in the bottom of the sterilizable tray (18). The relatively rigid spring tempered skeleton backbone (14) includes a plurality of peaks (32) and valleys (30) oriented in such a way that they align with the peaks (26) and indentations (24) of the resilient body (12) respectively. This structure (14) provides additional strength to the resilient silicone body (12). According to a first alternative embodiment of the invention (100) the studs (16) are replaced by resilient locking prongs or means (110a and 110b) separated by a stabilizer foot or tab (108). Each prong (210a and 210b) includes a resilient shaft (212a and 212b) and a head portion (214a and 214b) each of which includes a barb portion (130a and 130b) which face in opposite directions. When the first alternative bracket (100) is attached to the base of a tray (118) the resilient prongs (110a and 110b) and the intermediate stabilizer foot (108) all pass through, and lock into, into three separate vent perforations (120). In a second alternative embodiment (200) the resilient locking means or prongs (210a and 210b) come in pairs (208) and pass through the same vent perforations (120) in the base of the tray (118).

Description: TITLE: INSTRUMENT BRACKET WITH RESILIENT LOCKING MEANS FOR USE WITH A STERILIZABLE TRAY CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application is a continuation-in-part of my co-pendmg international application serial no PCT/US97/06650 having an international filing date of April 22, 1997 and entitled "INSTRUMENT BRACKET FOR USE WITH A STERILIZABLE TRAY", the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1 Field of the Invention The invention comprises a bracket for supporting medical instruments m a sterilizable tray m which the bracket body is formed primarily from resilient silicone and is strengthened by a relatively rigid, spring tempered, metal mteπor skeleton. 2. Description of Related Art It is common practice to put medical instruments on trays and place them into high temperature environments for the purposes of sterilization Steam heated autoclaves are probably the most common device used for killing germs and other biohazards. The instruments to be sterilized are generally placed in trays which, m turn, are placed into the cleansing environment. In order to keep the instruments from movmg, it is fairly common practice to separate and support them with brackets. Instrument supporting brackets can take several different forms Perhaps the most common form is a custom tray which includes custom made brackets laid out accordmg to the specific request of the customer An outline of the instrument to be supported is frequently prmted on the bottom surface of the tray so that accurate instrument positioning is achieved. It is also common practice to place an English language legend, such as "Russian Tissue Forceps" adjacent to the outline of the desired instrument The custom made brackets, which generally have an irregular shape, are then permanently attached to the tray with rivets While such trays have advantages, they have several disadvantages too. First of all, they are expensive and time consuming to produce because each tray has to be individualized for each specific customer's request Second, brackets are not removable and, therefore, there is no flexibility m the layout of the tray. Instrument holding trays, such as described are sold under the trademark MEDITRAY® by Case Medical, Inc , 65 Railroad Avenue, Ridgefield, New Jersey 07657. Another technique for attaching prior art brackets to a sterilizable tray is to have the brackets slide mto a keyway that is provided for on the tray itself. In an effort to further reduce costs, instrument holding brackets have recently become available which comprise stainless steel or aluminum bodies covered with a thin coat of nylon. The brackets typically have an L-shaped cross section. A pair of studs is attached to the bottom of the L-shaped bracket with nylon serving as the adhesive. The stainless steel or aluminum brackets just described can then be placed -selectively or randomly on a tray having a plurality of regularly spaced perforations therein. While the foregoing describe improvements in the art, they still do not present an optimal structure. What is desired is a bracket that will: withstand high temperatures; provide secure support for heavy instruments, yet light support for delicate instrumentation; provide for complete surrounding by steam; provide for the ability to grab and securely hold heavy and delicate instruments; provide flexibility and strong support at the same time; and, also, provide for the ability to place brackets at a wide variety of locations in order to accommodate a wide spectrum of instruments. In addition to the foregoing, one of the problems with prior art instrument brackets is the difficulty of efficiently attaching them to a sterilizable tray. One of the most common forms of prior art attachment is to use rivets. Unfortunately, rivet attachments make it impossible to remove a bracket and/or move it around without destroying the tray. Other approaches have been tried, but most tend to be permanent or take a considerable amount of time to attach. The prior art, therefore, appears to be lacking in a simple and efficient mechanism for attaching instrument holders to a sterilizable tray in a secure manner yet, at the same time, permit the instrument holder to be rearranged to accommodate different types of instruments. It was in the context of the foregoing prior art and the above identified needs that the present invention arose. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Briefly described, the invention comprises a bracket for supporting medical instruments in a sterilizable tray in which the bracket body is formed primarily from resilient silicone and is strengthened by a relatively rigid metal interior skeleton backbone. The resilient silicone bracket body includes a plurality of medical instrument receiving indentations or valleys separated by intervening peaks. Resilient ribs formed in the instrument receiving indentations gently support the medical instruments and optimally allow sterilizing steam to be exposed to the maximum surface area of the instrument. The spring tempered stainless steel skeleton backbone is encapsulated by the silicone body. The skeleton also includes peaks and valleys that mimic and align with the peaks and valleys of the silicone body and provide additional strength thereto. Flow- through holes or apertures in the skeleton backbone permit the silicone to optimally bond with the backbone. Threaded studs are mechanically attached to the skeleton backbone. Each stud includes a slotted head which attaches to the bottom edge of the stainless steel skeleton backbone, a widened, ring-like midsection, and a threaded end that is distal from the slotted end of the stud. The slotted end and most of the round midsection of the stud are also encapsulated in the silicone. The bracket is preferably attached to the tray by placing the threaded portions of the studs through the perforations in the tray and attaching them thereto with lock nuts. According to alternative embodiments of the invention, the studs may be replaced by resilient prongs that snap into the vent perforations in the bottom of the tray. Each prong includes a shaft attached at one end to the stainless steel skeleton and includes at the distal end thereof an enlarged head section. According to a first alternative embodiment, the barbs on the head sections of the prongs face away from each other and are separated by a stabilizing foot Each prong of a parr occupies its own individual perforation hole and is separated by the stabilizing foot which occupies a third hole between the two prongs Accordmg to a second alternative embodiment of the mvention, the barbs on the head sections of the prong pairs also face away from each other, but the prongs are located directly adjacent to each other m such a fashion that both prongs snap and lock mto the same perforation hole The two alternative embodiments also include a pair of resilient compressible ribs located on the resilient body of the bracket and on opposite sides of the lockmg prongs or means The resilient πbs compress when the prongs are inserted mto their respective vent perforation holes and help to provide sufficient pressure on the bracket and the lockmg prongs to keep the bracket stabile in the locked mode The mvention may be more fully understood by reference to the following drawings BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig 1 is a perspective view of the preferred embodiment of the sterilizable mstrument bracket Fig 2 is a perspective view of the preferred embodiment of the mvention illustrated in Fig 1 shown m the process of being placed mto a sterilizable tray and locked with respect thereto with lock nuts Fig 3 is a partial, perspective cross sectional view of the bracket illustrated in Fig 1 showmg the manner in which the slotted head of the studs are attached to the relatively rigid spring tempered skeleton backbone Fig 4 is a front, exploded view illustrating the manner in which the attachment studs are connected to the skeleton backbone Fig 5 is a partial, front cross sectional view of the folly assembled bracket Fig 6A is a front elevational view of a first alternative embodiment of the mvention, mtended to support only one medical mstrument, and employmg resilient lockmg means and further showmg a parr of prongs, each havmg barbs on their head sections facmg m opposite directions, separated by a stabilizing foot Fig 6B is a cross-sectional view of the first alternative embodiment of the mvention illustrated in Fig 6A Fig 6C is a detail, cross-sectional view of the lower portion of the bracket illustrated m Fig 6B showmg the compressible πbs prior to compression Fig 6D is another detail view of the lower portion of the first alternative embodiment of the mvention illustrated in Fig 6B showmg the compressible πbs under compression after the lockmg means have locked mto position m the vent perforations of a sterilizable tray Fig 6E is a front elevational view of the stamless steel skeleton, or backbone, employed with the first alternative embodiment of the mvention illustrated in Fig 6A Fig 6F is a side elevational view of the stamless steel skeleton illustrated in Fig 6E Fig 6G illustrates a detail of the stamless steel skeleton illustrated m Fig 6E pπor to the resilient lockmg means engagmg the vent perforations in the base of a steπlizable tray Fig 6H illustrates the stamless steel skeleton shown m Fig 6G after the lockmg means have engaged the vent perforations m the base of a sterilizable tray Fig 7A is a front elevational view of a second alternative embodiment of the invention, mtended to support multiple medical mstruments, m which the resilient lockmg means comprises a pair of prongs located adjacent to each other so that they can both be inserted mto the same vent hole the bottom of a sterilizable tray Fig 7B is a cross-sectional view of the second alternative embodiment of the invention shown in Fig 7A Fig 7C is a front elevational view of the stamless steel skeleton found mside of the second alternative embodiment of the mvention illustrated m Fig 7A Fig 7D is a side elevational view of the stamless steel skeleton shown m Fig 7C Fig 7E illustrates the stamless steel skeleton of Fig 7C prior to inserting the prong pair of lockmg means mto the vent perforations m the base of a sterilizable tray Fig 7F illustrates the prong parr of the lockmg means shown m Fig 7E after they have passed through the same vent perforation m the base of a sterilizable tray DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION During the course of this description like numbers will be used to identify like elements accordmg to the different views that illustrate the mvention The prefeπed embodiment of the mvention 10 is illustrated in a perspective view m Fig 1 The three major structural components of the prefeπed embodiment 10 are a resilient silicone body 12, a skeleton backbone 14 encapsulated by the silicone body 12 and a plurality of threaded studs 16 partially encapsulated by the silicone body 12 Bracket 10 is preferably attached to a sterilizable tray 18 such as illustrated in Fig 2 Tray 18 mcludes a plurality of regularly spaced perforations or apertures 20 for receivmg the threaded sections 50 of studs 16 of bracket 10 The threaded section or end 50 of studs 16 pass through the perforations 20 and are locked with respect thereto by lock nuts 52 which threadably attach to the threaded portion 50 on the portion of stud 16 opposite from the silicone body 12 Alternate methods could also be employed to attach studs 16 to tray 18 For example, the threaded sections 50 of the studs 16 could be smooth or threaded and a push on clip could be used mstead of lock nuts 52 to secure the bracket 10 to the apertures 20 m tray 18 A plurality of different medical mstruments 22 are supported by brackets 10 as shown m Fig 2 Threaded studs 16 are located at intervals identical to the spacmg between perforations 20 in tray 18 so that the brackets 10 may be placed in any aπangement for supporting medical mstruments 22 Therefore, it is easy to reaπange the brackets to accommodate a wide vaπety of different medical mstruments 22 which may vary substantially m size, weight and shape Details of the silicone body 12, its related relatively ngid sprmg tempered skeleton backbone 14, and threaded support studs 16 will be more fully appreciated by referπng to Figs 3 - 5 Medical mstruments 22 are received m indentations or valleys 24 m the resilient silicone body 12 The medical receivmg indentations are separated by resilient peaks 26 Ribs 28 located at regular intervals mside of the mstrument receivmg indentations 24 provide gentle yet firm support for the medical mstruments 22 More importantly, nbs 28 permit sterilizing steam to circulate m between so as to further assist m the killing of biohazardous germs and materials. There is a small gap between adjacent peaks 26 and the valleys 24 so as to further hold and secure an instrument 22 in the bracket 10. The profile of the relatively rigid spring tempered stainless steel skeleton backbone 14 generally mimics the profile of the peaks 26 and valleys 24 of the resilient silicone body 12. Skeleton backbone 14, therefore, includes valleys 30 separated by peaks 32. Each skeleton backbone 14 also includes a top edge 40, which incorporates peaks 32, and valleys 30, a bottom edge 42 which is attached to studs 16, and a pair of side ends 34. Flow through apertures 36 are located along the length of skeleton backbone 14. Likewise a pair of flow through holes or apertures 38, oriented perpendicularly to flow through apertures 36, are located in the side ends 34 of skeleton backbone 14. Each stud 16 includes a head 44, a ring shaped midsection 48 in the middle thereof, and a threaded end or section 50 distal from head 44. A skeleton receiving slot 46 is located in stud head 44. The slot 46 in stud head 44 is slightly smaller than the width of the skeleton backbone 14 so that it mechanically locks onto the bottom edge 42 of the skeleton backbone 14. For additional security it may be desirable to weld the slotted head 44 to the bottom edge 42 of the skeleton backbone 14. The ring shaped midsection 44 of stud 16 supports the bottom edge 42 of the skeleton backbone 14. The bracket 10, according to its prefeπed embodiment, is constructed in the following manner. First, the bottom edge 42 of the backbone 14 is placed into the slot 46 in the head 44 of stud 16. Three studs 16 are shown in Figs. 1 - 5 but two studs 16 or four or more studs 16 could also be used according to the demands of the use. Studs 16 are preferably placed at regular intervals identical to the spacing between perforations 20 in tray 18 as previously described. Stud heads 44 are then mechanically attached to the bottom edge 42 of skeleton backbone 14 either by crimping or by welding, or both. Second, the skeleton backbone 14 with studs 16 attached is then placed into a mold in which silicone is injected to form resilient body 12. The silicone completely encapsulates the skeleton backbone 14. Flow through apertures 36 and 38 in skeleton backbone 14 further assist in mechanically anchoring the silicone body 12 to the skeleton backbone 14. As previously described, the silicone also encapsulates the head 44 and most of the midsection 48 of stud 16. The exposed portion of the midsection 48 of stud 16 also serves as a stop for the bracket 10 when it is placed in position on tray 18. The resulting molded silicone bracket 10 includes sculpted indents 54 in the sides of the silicone bracket body 12. Sculpted indents 54 help to conserve weight and space. The invention described thus far has several significant, nonobvious advantages over the prior art. First, it provides for substantial versatility for permanent or semi-permanent fixturing of brackets 10 with respect to instruments. Second, it provides important structural support for heavy instruments 22, yet protects delicate instruments 22. Third, the encapsulated metal 14 cannot damage delicate instrumentation 22. Fourth, the flexible silicone ribs 28 provide grip with minimal contact of the instrument 22 to the bracket surface, yet permits optimum sterilization. Presently existing prior art brackets do not allow for optimal sterilization, as they tend to be bulky and grip a large surface area of the instrument 22. Fifth, the spring tempered metal skeleton 14 permits the bracket 10 to adjust slightly so that the threaded portion 50 of the studs 16 can align with perforations 20 in the tray 18 even if there isn't perfect spacing. A first alternative embodiment 100 of the mvention is illustrated in Figs 6 A - 6H Embodiment 100 mcludes a silicone body 102 and a stainless steel skeleton or backbone 104 both similar to, but not identical to, the prefeπed embodiment 10 The bottom portion of the silicone body 102 mcludes a parr of parallel, compressible ribs 106a and 106b shown m detail m Figs 6C and 6D Compressible πbs 106a and 106b lie on opposite sides of a stabilizing tab or control foot 108 seen m Fig 6 A Stabilizing foot 108 is located between a pair of opposite facmg resilient lockmg prongs 110a and 110b Details of the resilient lockmg prongs 110a and 110b may be more easily understood by reference to Figs 6E, 6G and 6H The resilient lockmg prongs 110a and 110b in combination with a stabilizer foot 108 comprise a resilient locking means which holds the first alternative embodiment of the bracket 100 in position with respect to the base 118 of the sterilizable tray Each of the resilient prongs 110a and 110b mclude a shaft portion 112a and 112b attached at one end to the stamless steel backbone 104 and at the distal end thereof a head 114a and 114b Each of the heads 114a and 114b, respectively, mclude a barb portion 130a and 130b which face m opposite directions from each other The stamless steel skeleton 104 includes a saddle portion 116 located half way between upper tips 126a and 126b A pan: of downward directed, wmg-hke projections 124a and 124b are located on opposite sides of the stamless steel skeleton 104 A flow through hole 126 permits the silicone material of the silicone body 102 to pass through the stamless steel skeleton 104 and remforces its strength Stamless steel skeleton 104 also mcludes a lower edge 128 that defines the bottom portion of the mam body of the element The first alternative embodiment 100 described m Figs 6A - 6H is especially suited for use with a single medical instrument The same technique could, however, be used for a larger bracket if desired The first alternative embodiment 100 is connected to the base 118 of a tray m the folio wmg manner First, the resilient prongs 110a and 110b are squeezed towards each other so that they can pass through vent holes 120 m the base 118 of the tray (see Figs 6C and 6G) Second, the resilient prongs 110a and 110b are inserted mto the holes 120 which causes the compressible silicone πbs 106a and 106b to begm to compress Thud, and last, the oppositely facmg barbs 130a and 130b sprmg outwardly after they pass sufficiently far through the vent holes 120 so that the resilient prongs 110a and 110b lock mto position In the meantime, the stabilizing foot 108 also passes through an intermediate aperture 120 and fits snugly therein Simultaneously, the compressible ribs 106a and 106b are at maximum compression as seen in Figs 6D The ridges or ribs 106a and 106b compress to account for use with different materials or different thicknesses of the tray base 118 Accordmg to the prefeπed embodiment of the mvention, the first alternative embodiment 100 has a height of H B of 1 070 inches, a width W B of 1 150 mches and a length measured from the top of the bracket 100 to the bottom portion of the silicone body adjacent to foot 108 of L BP of 1 00 mches as seen m Fig 6A As shown in Fig 6B, the first alternative embodiment 100 has a maximum width of W B max = 0 350 inches and a minimum width W B mm of 0 225 inches Similarly, the stamless steel skeleton 104 has a prefeπed width of W s of 0 05 mches, and a height of H s of 0 73 inches, as shown m Fig 6E, and a width T s of 0 05 inches, as shown in Fig 6F One of the major advantages of the first alternative embodiment 100 is that the resilient prongs 110a and 110b can snap mto plastic trays 0 125 mches thick and metal trays as thin as 0 05 mches thick or any combination of mateπals from 0 040 mches to 0 150 mches thick The single prong per hole structure of the first alternative embodiment 100 requires a stabilizing foot or tab 108 so that the lockmg prongs 110a and 110b will not bend beyond their yield strength The stamless steel spine 104 is preferably formed from sprmg tempered stamless steel such as VA inch hard no 301 or no 400 sprmg tempered stamless steel The silicone body 102 is preferably a material havmg a durometer m the range of 30 - 50 The foot or tab 108 has two purposes The first is to assist m the location of the holes 120 in the tray bottom 118 and the second is to prevent the overstressing of the resilient prongs 110a and 110b In addition, the two compressible πbs 106a and 106b located on opposite sides of the stabilizer foot 108 provide spring tensionmg to make up for the varying thicknesses of the tray base or bottom 118 In order to remove the bracket 104, a pair of pliers can be employed, or a special tool can be used, which squeeze the barbs 130a and 130b mwardly, towards each other, so that the bracket 100 can be grasped and the prongs 110a and 110b pulled out of then: respective apertures 120 In this manner the bracket 100 can be reused or relocated A second alternative embodiment 200 employmg resilient prong parrs 208 is illustrated m Figs 7A - 7F Second alternative embodiment 200 mcludes a silicone body 202 attached to a stainless steel skeleton 204 A pair of resilient, compressible ribs 206a and 206b are located at the bottom of the silicone body 202 and on opposite sides of the resilient lockmg means 208 Details of the skeleton or spme 204 can be more fully understood by reference to Figs 7C — 7F As seen m greater detail m Fig 7E, the resilient lockmg means 208 compπses a pair of resilient prongs 210a and 210b Resilient prong 210a mcludes a shaft 212a and a head portion 214a Head portion 214a mcludes a barb 230a shown facmg to the left Similarly, resilient prong 210b includes a shaft portion 212b attached to the skeleton 204 and a head portion 214b attached to the opposite or distal end of shaft 212b Head portion 214b mcludes a nght facmg barb 230b which faces m the opposite direction from barb 230a previously descπbed Resilient prongs 210a and 210b are fairly long and extend a distance L p from the base or bottom 224 of the skeleton 204 mto the mteπor of the skeleton 204 as seen in detail in Figs 7E and 7F In other words, the length of prongs 210 and 210b considerably exceeds the distance from skeleton base 224 to the tip of the head portions 214a and 214b Each skeleton 204 preferably mcludes a plurality of circular, or oblong, flow-through holes 216 whose purpose is similar to that previously described with reference to flow-through holes 126 of the first alternative embodiment 100 The bottom edge 224 of the stamless steel skeleton 204 is relatively flat except for the location of the dual lockmg means 208 In contrast, the upper surface of skeleton 204 compnses a series of peaks 218 and valleys 220 Peaks 218 permit the shafts 212a and 212b of prongs 210a and 210b, respectively, to extend significantly into the body of the stamless steel skeleton 204 thereby providmg substantially more resilience for the prongs 210a and 210b The foregoing structure creates a pair of small valleys 224a and 224b on the outsides of prongs 210a and 210b and a longer valley 226 between prongs 210a and 210b The second alternative embodiment 200 is attached to the base 118 of a sterilizable tray in the following manner First, the resilient locking means 208, compπsmg a pair of prongs 210a and 210b as shown m Figs 7E is positioned over the vent perforations 120 of the steπlizable tray 118 Second, pressure is applied to the top of the second alternative embodiment 200 to insert the prongs 210a and 210b mto vent aperture 120 Because of the slanted face of the head portions 214a and 214b of barbs 230a and 230b, the aperture 120 naturally cams or squeezes the prongs 210a and 210b so that they fit into aperture 120. Third, continual pressure applied on the top of the second alternative embodiment bracket 200 causes the head portions 214a and 214b to pass through aperture 120 and snap into the locked position as shown in Fig. 7F. In this position the barbs 230a and 230b resiliently move to a position beyond the outside periphery of the aperture 120 and are resistant to removal. When the prongs 210a and 210b are in the position shown in Fig. 7F, the second alternative embodiment 200 is firmly attached to the tray base 118 and cannot be removed of dislodged easily. In order to remove the second alternative embodiment bracket 200, it is merely necessary to pinch or squeeze the two head portions 214a and 214b of each of the pairs 208 together and, at the same time, gently pull on the bracket 200 on the opposite side thereby permitting the barbs 230a and 230b to pass back through vent perforations 120 and release when they emerge on the opposite side of the apertures 120. Prongs 210a and 210b may be squeezed together either manually or with the assistance of needle nose pliers or similar instruments. In this manner, the bracket 200 may be either removed or reaπanged in a more suitable manner depending upon the type of instruments to be sterilized with the tray 118. The dual locking tab or prong embodiment 200 is especially useful for long brackets such as illustrated in Fig. 7A. The bracket 200 shown in Fig. 7A has a prefeπed width W B of 9.4 inches and a height H B of 1.07 inches. As seen in Fig. 7B, the maximum width W B „_ x of the bracket 200 is 0.35 inches and the minimum width as measured to the interior of the silicone body 204 is W B min = 0.225 inches. The stainless steel skeleton 204, as shown in Fig. 7C, has a prefeπed width W s of 9.087 inches and a height H s of 0.482 inches. The distance from each end 234 of the spine 204 to the first pair of resilient locking means 208 is D PE approximately 1.544 inches, and the distance between resilient locking pairs 208 D PP is approximately 3.000 inches. Lastly, as shown in Fig. 7D, the prefeπed thickness T s of skeleton 204 is approximately 0.05 inches. The materials employed with respect to the dual locking tab, second alternative embodiment 200 are essentially the same as the materials employed with the single locking tab first embodiment 100, previously described. The first alternative embodiment 100 includes flexible silicone fingers 132 for the purpose of grabbing a single instrument and, similarly, the second alternative embodiment 200 includes flexible silicone fingers 232 also. The silicone fingers 132 and 232 are appropriate for grabbing 10 mm instruments above fingers 132 and 232 and for containing 5 mm instruments below fingers 132 and 232. As previously described single locking tab, first alternative embodiment 100 including the stabilizing foot 108, is especially appropriate for small brackets. In contrast, the dual locking tab, second alternative embodiment 200, where both resilient prongs 210a and 210b pass through the same aperture 120, is especially appropriate for larger brackets. While the invention has been described with reference to the prefeπed embodiment thereof, it will be appreciate by those of ordinary skill in the art that modifications can be made to the structure and form of the invention without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.

Claims: WE CLAIM: 1. A sterilizable instrument supporting bracket apparatus (100, 200) for attachment to a tray (118) having regularly spaced vent perforations (120) therein, said apparatus comprising: a resilient body ( 102, 202); instrument supporting means located on said resilient body (102, 202) for supporting at least one medical instrument; skeleton means (104, 204) located within said resilient body (102, 202) for providing support to said resilient body (102, 202); and, resilient locking means ( 110a, 110b, 210a, 210b) attached to said skeleton means ( 104, 204), wherein said bracket apparatus (100, 200) is attachable to said tray (118) by squeezing said resilient locking means (110a, 110b, 210a, 210b) and passing them into said perforations (120) so that they afterwards expand and lock into said perforations (120). 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said locking means (110a, 110b, 210a, 210b) comprises at least: a first locking means (110a, 210a) attached to said skeleton means (104, 204); and, a second locking means (110b, 210b) also attached to said skeleton means (104, 204). 3. The apparatus of claim 2 further comprising: resilient ribs means (106a, 106b, 206a, 206b) attached to said resilient body (102, 202) for compressing when said locking means (1110a, 110b, 210a, 210b) are passed into said perforations (120). 4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein said locking means (110a, 110b, 210a, 210b) comprise: a shaft portion (112a, 112b, 212a, 212b) attached to said skeleton (104, 204); and, a head portion (114a, 114b, 214a, 214b) attached to said shaft portion (112a, 112b, 214a, 214b). 5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said head portions (114a & 214a, 114b &214b) face in opposite directions. 6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein said first (110a) and second (110b) locking means each respectively engage different perforations (120) in said tray (118). 7. The apparatus of claim 6 further comprising: a stabilizing foot means ( 108) for engaging a perforation ( 120) located between the perforations (120) engaged by said first (110a) and second (110b) locking means. 8. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein said first (210a) and second (210b) locking means (208) are located adjacent each other and pass through the same perforation (120) when said locking means (208) engage said tray (118). 9. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the length of said shaft (112a, 112b, 212a, 212b) Lp is longer than the maximum distance from the bottom (128, 222) of said skeleton (104, 204) to the head portion (112a, 112b, 212a, 212b) of said locking means (110a, 110b, 210a, 210b).

Inventors: FRIEZE ALLAN S, FRIEZE MARCIA A, FRIEZE, ALLAN, S., FRIEZE, MARCIA, A.
Applicants: CASE MEDICAL INC, FRIEZE ALLAN S, FRIEZE MARCIA A, CASE MEDICAL, INC., FRIEZE, ALLAN, S., FRIEZE, MARCIA, A.
Application year: 1997
Main classification: A61L2
IPC codes: A61B19, A61L2