METHOD FOR REDUCING SULFUR-OXIDE EMISSIONS FROM AN ASPHALT AIR-BLOWING PROCESS

Abstract: A method for substantially reducing sulfur-oxide emissions from an asphalt air-blowing process (51) involves adding an emission reducing additive (53) to the asphalt prior to air blowing, or early in the air-blowing process. The emission-reducing additive includes at least one of metal hydroxide, metal oxide, metal carbonate, or metal bicarbonate, where the metal is sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, or aluminum. The asphalt is subjected to an air-blowing process that produces flue gases, including sulfur containing compounds. The flue gases are passed through a filter (50), preferably of the fiber-bed type, to remove at least a portion of the sulfur-containing compounds via condensation. After passing through the filter, the gases are subjected to an incineration process (55) before being passed to the atmosphere. The combination of filter and emission-reducing additive can advantageously reduce sulfur-oxide emissions from the asphalt air-blowing process by at least 50 % over the same process without the filter and additive.

Description: METHOD FOR REDUCING SULFUR-OXIDE EMISSIONS FROM AN ASPHALT AIR-BLOWING PROCESS CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application is related to the following U.S. patent applications: Serial No. 08/724,714, by Jorge A. Marzari et al., filed September 30, 1996; Serial No. 08/459,081, by Jorge A. Marzari, filed June 2, 1995; and Serial No. 08/599,773, by Jorge A. Marzari et al., filed February 12, 1996. TECHNICAL FIELD AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The invention relates to processing asphalt, and particularly to a method for reducing sulfur emissions when air-blowing asphalt. More specifically, the invention relates to a method which produces an asphalt preferred for use as a roofing asphalt. The asphalt is not detrimental to roofing materials or their properties. The invention can be useful in processing asphalt for such uses as roofing asphalt, specialty asphalt, and Strategic Research Highway Program (SHRP) applications. The invention is also directed to an improved method for reducing sulfur- oxide emissions from an asphalt air-blowing process. More particularly, this invention relates to a method for reducing sulfur-oxide emissions using a filter and an emission- reducing additive. The method has industrial applicability, e.g., in air-blowing asphalt for use as a roofing asphalt or specialty coating. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Unblown asphalts have low softening points, low viscosity (e.g., 12 cps at 205°C) and high penetration (e.g., 250-300 mm/10 at 25°C). Although most asphalts are used in paving, a significant percentage are used for other applications, primarily roofing and specialty coatings. Asphalts for roofing and specialty coatings are typically air-blown to reduce aging and to increase resistance to weathering. The air-blowing process, also referred to as the oxidizing process, is used to thicken the asphalt raw material. As a result, the penetration decreases, and both the softening point and viscosity increase. Nevertheless, the resultant blown product at a selected softening point can be too hard and brittle at certain cooler temperatures, or can be so soft that it will flow on a hot summer day. Consequently, the relationships between the viscosity, penetration, and softening point are very important. The trend in worldwide sources of asphalt is that the asphalt raw material is blown to a harder product with the sulfur content steadily increasing. These asphalts have lower penetrations when blown to the desired softening point, and the product properties ofthe resultant asphalt are adversely affected. The air-blowing process increases the usefulness ofthe asphalt by raising the softening point from a typical starting point of about 40°C to a softening point of about 80°C or higher. The air-blowing process involves loading the asphalt raw material into a converter at a temperature of from about 150°C to about 205°C. Air is bubbled or blown through the molten asphalt. The reaction produced by the blowing is exothermic and raises the temperature ofthe asphalt to about 260°C. The maximum temperature is usually controlled by a water-cooled jacket. The process is usually carried out in batches. The processing time can take from about 1 hour to about 18 hours to reach the desired softening point. The processing time is dependent on the process temperature, the air flow rate, the characteristics ofthe asphalt, and the desired product. Catalysts are frequently blended into the mixture to increase the reaction rate and thereby reduce the processing time. A commonly used catalyst is ferric chloride, which is typically used in concentrations of up to about 1 percent ofthe blended catalyst and asphalt. Catalysts can also help provide better penetrations for the desired softening point. One ofthe problems with asphalt processing is the generation of undesirable gaseous emissions. Sulfur-containing compounds are a significant component of these gaseous emissions. The asphalt air-blowing process generates flue gases typically containing hydrogen sulfide, sulfur oxides (SOχ), organosulfur compounds, hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides (NO x ), carbon monoxide, and water. Higher throughputs of asphalt in the air-blowing process result in greater amounts of flue gases. Prior to release into the atmosphere, the flue gases are passed through a water-sealed knockout tank and then subjected to an incineration process to control the emissions of volatile organic compounds. . Unfortunately, the incineration process does not control emissions of all the above gases. SO x emissions are generated from the combustion ofthe hydrogen sulfide or by the oxidation of mercaptans and heavier sulfur-organic compounds in the incinerator. Typical undesirable sulfur-oxide emissions include sulfur dioxide (SO2) and sulfur trioxide (SO3), and combinations of these compounds with other substances such as water. Sulfur-oxide compounds are responsible for the generation of acid rain when they condense with humidity. In order to comply with environmental emissions regulations, asphalt-processing plants make use of sound and proven best-available emissions-reduction technology. If the regulated emission levels are not achieved, the asphalt production could be restricted below capacity, or the plant could be forced to pay high fines or penalties. One process currently used to reduce sulfur-oxide emissions involves cleaning incinerated gases with expensive caustic scrubber equipment. The scrubbers require extensive initial capital costs and significant annual operating costs. The caustic scrubbing process also generates an additional waste stream containing undesirable byproducts, such as sodium and potassium sulfides, sulfites, and sulfates, all of which require special handling for disposal. Other processes are also known for reducing sulfur- oxide emissions, but the processes all suffer from various drawbacks. Some methods for separating some types of sulfur compounds from certain industrial processes using filters or condensers are known. For example, U.S. Patent Nos. 4,915,714 to Teague et al. and 5,045,094 to Paranjpe disclose fiber filters for use in removing sulfuric-acid mist in an acid-manufacturing process. U.S. Patent No. 4,741,868 to Rooney et al. discloses fiber filters for use in removing SO 3 vapors from a storage tank. U.S. Patent No. 2,112,250 to Penniman discloses condensers to remove sulfur oxides from a vapor stream formed by oxidizing petroleum. However, there remains a need for an effective method of reducing sulfur-oxide emissions from an asphalt air-blowing process. It would be advantageous if a process could be developed to reduce SO x emissions without requiring high-cost capital equipment. Such a process would ideally also not generate any undesirable byproducts. Further, such a process should not retard the asphalt-blowing process or adversely affect the softening point/viscosity/penetration relationships in the blown asphalt. NO x emissions are another unpleasant gaseous byproduct from asphalt processing. It would be desirable if a process could be developed to reduce SO x emissions without greatly increasing the amount of NOχ emissions. It would also be desirable if such a process produced an asphalt that is noncorrosive and does not cause any detrimental effect on roofing materials or their properties. By way of background, asphalts for roofing can be used as built-up roofing asphalt (BURA) or in asphalt roofing shingles. On a built-up roof, a layer of asphalt is applied to the roof, followed by a mat of fiberglass or organic material, followed by another layer of asphalt and then another mat. The asphalt comes into contact with various roofing materials by initial contact and leaching. Such roofing materials include metallic structures such as eaves, gutters, flashings, and nails. Therefore, it can be seen that a process to reduce SO x emissions should also produce an asphalt that does not have a detrimental effect on roofing materials, so that the materials do not rust, corrode, or lose their strength. The asphalt should also be able to maintain a lasting bond with the other materials with which it comes in contact, including both metallic and non-metallic materials. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In one aspect ofthe invention, an emission-reducing additive is added in an amount sufficient to reduce the SO x emissions from the blowing process by at least 25 percent by weight when compared with the same process without the emission-reducing additive. The emission-reducing additive comprises at least two compounds selected from the group consisting of metal hydroxides, metal oxides, metal carbonates, and metal bicarbonates, where the metal is selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, and aluminum. Preferably the compounds include at least one metal hydroxide selected from sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium hydroxides, and at least one metal oxide selected from zinc, copper, and aluminum oxides. More preferably, the additive comprises from about 0.05% to about 0.75% sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide, from about 0.02% to about 0.7% zinc oxide, and from about 0.01% to about 0.5% copper oxide, by weight ofthe combined mixture of asphalt and additive. The inventive method attains many advantages. The emission-reducing additive enhances the softening point/viscosity/ penetration relationships ofthe asphalt by increasing the penetration to a level above that which would be achieved without the additive. Also, other properties ofthe asphalt are improved, such as pliability, ductility, and weathering. The process does not require high-cost capital equipment, and does not produce any undesirable byproducts. The process does not greatly increase the amount of NO x emissions. The emission-reducing additive is present in an amount which does not substantially change the rate ofthe asphalt-blowing process when compared with the same process without the additive. One object ofthe invention is to provide a method for reducing sulfur- oxide emissions from an asphalt air-blowing process without requiring high-cost equipment. Another object is to provide a method that can greatly reduce sulfur-oxide emissions, where the throughput in the air-blowing process is advantageously high while still complying with environmental emissions regulations. A further object is to provide a method for reducing sulfur-oxide emissions prior to the end ofthe air-blowing process, so that no additional solid or liquid waste stream is created. These and other objects and advantages have also been achieved through another aspect ofthe invention providing a method for reducing sulfur-oxide emissions from an asphalt air-blowing process. In this method, an emission-reducing additive is combined with asphalt prior to air-blowing, or early in the air-blowing process. The asphalt is subjected to an air-blowing process which produces flue gases including sulfur- containing compounds, and the flue gases are passed through a filter to remove at least a portion ofthe sulfur-containing compounds. After passing through the filter, the flue gases are subjected to an incineration process before being emitted into the atmosphere. The combination ofthe filter and emission-reducing additive preferably reduces sulfur- oxide emissions from the asphalt air-blowing process by at least about 50% by weight over the same process without the filter and emission-reducing additive. The emission-reducing additive is preferably at least one compound selected from metal hydroxides, metal oxides, metal carbonates, metal bicarbonates, and mixtures thereof. Preferred metals are sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, aluminum, and mixtures thereof. An especially preferred additive contains an alkali-metal hydroxide and zinc and copper oxides. The filter or phase-change element is preferably a fibrous or fabric material, such as a packing of glass or polymer fibers. A preferred fibrous filter material has a packed fiber density of from about 130 kilograms/meter 3 to about 320 kilograms/meter 3 . Preferably, the ratio ofthe gas flow rate in cubic meters per minute to filter surface area in square meters is from about 0.9 to about 9, more preferably from 1.5 to 4.6. One embodiment ofthe inventive method for reducing sulfur-oxide emissions from an asphalt blowing process comprises: adding to an asphalt an emission- reducing additive comprising a metal hydroxide, metal oxide, metal carbonate, and/or metal bicarbonate, wherein the metal is selected from sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, and aluminum, to form an asphalt-additive mixture; subjecting the asphalt-additive mixture to a blowing process that produces a gas stream including sulfur-containing compounds; passing the gas stream through a fiber filter to remove at least a portion ofthe sulfur-containing compounds, wherein the filter comprises fibers packed at a density of from about 130 kilograms/meter 3 to about 320 kilograms/meter 3 , the ratio ofthe flow rate ofthe gas stream through the filter to the surface area ofthe filter is from about 0.9 meter 3 /minute-meter 2 to about 9 meters 3 /minute-meter 2 , and the gas stream is at a temperature not greater than about 121 °C when passed through the filter; and subjecting the filtered gas stream to an incineration process. Another embodiment includes the steps of: adding to an asphalt an emission-reducing additive in an amount of from about 0.1% to about 2.0% by weight ofthe asphalt combined with the emission- reducing additive, the emission-reducing additive comprising at least one metal hydroxide selected from sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, and magnesium hydroxide, and at least one metal oxide selected from zinc oxide, copper oxide, and aluminum oxide; subjecting the asphalt to an air-blowing process that produces a gas stream including sulfur-containing compounds; passing the gas stream through a filter to condense and remove at least a portion ofthe sulfur-containing compounds; and subjecting the filtered gas stream to an incineration process. Other embodiments and features ofthe invention will become apparent from the detailed description in conjunction with the drawing figures. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRA WINGS Figure 1 is a flow diagram of an asphalt air-blowing process including a filter for reducing sulfur-oxide emissions in accordance with this invention. Figure 2 is a side-elevational view of a commercial-scale filter for use in the invention. Figure 3 is a cross-sectional view ofthe filter taken along line 3-3 of Figure 2. Figure 4 is a side-elevational view of a smaller-scale filter for use in the invention. Figure 5 is a cross-sectional view of the filter taken along line 5-5 of Figure 4. DETAILED DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION The term "asphalt" as used in this specification includes any asphalt bottoms from petroleum refineries, as well as naturally occurring asphalts, tars, and pitches. It is to be understood that the source of asphalt may have a significant effect on the final nature ofthe processed material. Unless otherwise specified, all percentages herein are by weight. In one general aspect, the asphalt-blowing process involves passing air or other gases, such as steam, oxygen, or carbon dioxide, through the asphalt in a converter at temperatures within the range of from about 150°C to about 290°C for a time of from about 1 hour to about 18 hours. The air flow in the converter is usually from about 14- 360 liters (STP) per hour/liter of processed asphalt. If desired, a conventional catalyst can be used in the process. In accordance with this aspect ofthe invention, an emission-reducing additive is added to the asphalt to reduce SO x emissions from the blowing process. The emission-reducing additive can be added by blending it into the asphalt prior to the blowing process, or by adding it into the converter early in the process, preferably within about the first two hours. The emission-reducing additive is effective at every time ofthe process. However, peak SO x emissions are found generally during the first 1.5 hour in an air-blowing process without any additive. Therefore, if the emission-reducing additive is added late in the process, it will reduce emissions only from the time it is blended into the asphalt. Preferably the additive includes at least one compound where the metal is selected from sodium, potassium, calcium or magnesium, and at least one compound where the metal is selected from zinc, copper or aluminum. More preferably, the additive includes at least one metal hydroxide selected from sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium hydroxides, and at least one metal oxide selected from zinc, copper, and aluminum oxides. In another preferred embodiment, the additive includes two compounds selected from the group consisting of zinc oxide, copper oxide, and aluminum oxide. The copper oxide includes both cuprous oxide, CU2O, and cupric oxide, CuO. The emission-reducing additive is added to the asphalt in an amount sufficient to reduce the SO x emissions from the blowing process by at least about 25% by weight over the same process without the additive, preferably at least about 40%, more preferably at least about 50%, and most preferably at least about 60%. The SO χ emissions are measured by drawing a stream of effluent from the incinerator through a heated sample line at 127°C, then through a gas conditioner to remove moisture, and then through a Bovar Model 721 Photometric Analyzer at a flow rate of 1 liter/minute. The SO x emissions are measured in parts per million. The percent reduction in SO x emissions is calculated by comparing the SO x emissions with those from an asphalt not containing an emission-reducing additive. Advantageously, the addition ofthe additive to reduce SO x emissions does not greatly increase the amount of NO x emissions, which are another unpleasant gaseous byproduct from asphalt processing. Preferably, the NOχ emissions from the process are increased by not greater than about 30% by weight over the same process without the additive, more preferably not greater than about 20%, and most preferably not greater than about 10%. The NO x emissions are measured by the same process as the SO x emissions. It has been discovered that the addition of two of the selected compounds has a synergistic effect in the reduction of SO x emissions compared to the addition of a single compound. Moreover, it has been discovered that the addition of a third compound has a further synergistic effect in the reduction of SO x emissions. Consequently, the emission-reducing additive can contain lower levels of alkali hydroxide than would otherwise be required for the same emission reduction. These lower levels of alkali hydroxide avoid a detrimental effect on roofing materials which can be caused by asphalts containing higher levels of alkali hydroxide. While the amount of alkali hydroxide is reduced, the emission-reducing additive still contains a sufficient amount of alkali hydroxide to provide many benefits to the asphalt product. The emission-reducing additive enhances the softening point/ viscosity/penetration relationships ofthe asphalt by increasing the penetration to a level above that which would be achieved without the additive. As a result, the starting asphalt can be selected from a wide range of worldwide sources. The emission-reducing additive also improves the pliability and ductility ofthe asphalt product. The emission-reducing additive can also contain levels of zinc oxide or copper oxide lower than would be required if one of these compounds was added alone. Because these compounds are relatively expensive, the cost ofthe asphalt product is significantly reduced compared to an asphalt containing higher levels of a single one of these compounds Another possible benefit of including the zinc and/or the copper in the asphalt is to reduce or inhibit the growth of fungi and/or algae on roofing shingles made with the asphalt. The following examples illustrate the first aspect ofthe invention. EXAMPLE I An asphalt blend was made by mixing Amoco asphalt and Clark asphalt (both asphalts including Wyoming and Canadian crude sources). The asphalt had an initial softening point of about 38°C and a penetration of about 300 mm/10 at 25°C. The asphalt was blown as both a straight-run asphalt and with the addition of a first emission- reducing additive in accordance with this invention. The additive contained 0.2% sodium hydroxide, 0.165% zinc oxide, and 0.05% copper oxide, by weight ofthe combined mixture of asphalt and additive. To add the sodium hydroxide, 454 kilograms ofthe asphalt was placed in a converter at 205°C, and air was blown at 2300 liters (STP) per minute. Then, 10.9 kilograms of a 50 percent by weight solution of sodium hydroxide was added. Separately, to add the zinc oxide and copper oxide, 4.5 kilograms of zinc oxide powder and 1.36 kilograms of copper oxide powder were added to 2270 kilograms of asphalt in a mix tank. The asphalt in the mix tank was then pumped to the converter and mixed with the other asphalt to make a 2724-kilogram batch. This mixture was blown for about 15 minutes at a temperature of about 205 °C, and an airflow of about 2300 liters (STP) per minute. The blowing process was continued at about 260°C, with an airflow of about 4600 liters (STP) per minute. The asphalt was blown to a target softening point of 105°C. The SO x emissions from the incinerator were measured. The results are shown in Table I. It can be seen that the first emission-reducing additive reduced the SO χ emissions by about 70% over the same process without the additive. An asphalt was blown in a manner similar to the process described above, as both a straight-run asphalt and with the addition of a second emission-reducing additive in accordance with this invention. The additive contained 0.1 % sodium hydroxide, 0.1% zinc oxide, and 0.05% copper oxide, by weight ofthe combined mixture of asphalt and additive. The SO x emissions from the incinerator were measured. The results are shown in Table I. It can be seen that the second emission-reducing additive reduced the SO x emissions by about 67% over the same process without the additive. Table I Asphalt % Emission-Reducing Addition % Reduction 5 100% None 99.585% 0.2% NaOH, 0.165% ZnO, and 0.05% CuO 70% 99.75% 0.1% NaOH, 0.1% ZnO, and 0.05% CuO 67% EXAMPLE II Batches of asphalt were blown in a process similar to the process described 10 in Example I. One batch was blown as a straight-run asphalt. The other batches were blown with the addition of different emission-reducing additives in accordance with this invention. The SO x emissions from the incinerator were measured. The results are shown in Table II. It can be seen that the emission-reducing additives significantly reduced the SO x emissions. 15 Table II Asphalt % Emission Reducing Addition % Reduction 100% None 99.62% 0.33% ZnO and 0.05% CuO 45% 99.5% 0.25% ZnO and 0.25% NaOH 46% 20 99.52% 0.33% ZnO, 0.05% CuO, and 0.10% NaOH 80% 99.685% 0.165% ZnO, 0.05% CuO, and 0.10% NaOH 75% EXAMPLE III Batches of asphalt were blown in a process similar to the process described in Example I. A first batch was blown as a straight-run asphalt. A second batch was 25 blown with the addition of 0.2% NaOH. A third batch was blown with the addition of 0.05% CuO and 0.165% ZnO. A fourth batch was blown with the addition of all three compounds, 0.2% NaOH, 0.05% CuO, and 0.165% ZnO. The SO x emissions from the incinerator were measured, he results are shown in Table III. It can be seen that the emission-reducing additive containing all three compounds had a superior effect in 30 reducing the SO x emissions. Table III Asphalt % Emission-Reducing Addition % Reduction 100% None — 99.8% 0.2% NaOH 15% 5 99.785% 0.05% CuO and 0.165% ZnO 45% 99.585% 0.2% NaOH, 0.05% CuO, and 0.165% ZnO 70% EXAMPLE IV Batches of asphalt were blown in a process similar to the process described in Example I. A first batch was blown as a straight-run asphalt. A second batch was 10 blown with the addition of 0.25% NaOH. A third batch was blown with the addition of 0.5% ZnO. A fourth batch was blown with the addition of 0.25% NaOH and 0.25% ZnO. The SO x emissions from the incinerator were measured. The results are shown in Table IV. The percent reduction provided by 0.25% ZnO would be expected to be about 10% (i.e., about one-half the percent reduction provided by the addition of 0.5% ZnO). It can 15 be seen that the emission reducing additive containing both 0.25% NaOH and 0.25% ZnO had a synergistic effect in reducing the SO x emissions. Table IV Asphalt % Emission Reducing Addition % Reduction 100% None ™ 20 99.75% 0.25% NaOH 30% 99.75% 0.5% ZnO 20% 99.5% 0.25% NaOH and 0.25% ZnO 46% EXAMPLE V Batches of asphalt were blown in a process similar to the process described 25 in Example I. A first batch was blown as a straight-run asphalt. A second batch was blown with the addition of 1 % NaOH. A third batch was blown with the addition of 0.5% NaOH. A fourth batch was blown with the addition of 0.25% NaOH. A fifth batch was blown with the addition of an emission-reducing additive in accordance with this invention: 0.2% NaOH, 0.165% ZnO and 0.05% CuO. The NO x emissions from the 0 incinerator were measured. The results are shown in Table V. It can be seen that the NO x emissions were increased from asphalt containing the higher levels of NaOH. Advantageously, the emission-reducing additive of this invention did not significantly increase the NO x emissions from the asphalt. Table V Asphalt % Emission-Reducing Addition % Reduction 5 100% None — 99% !% NaOH 50% 99.5% 0.5% NaOH 40% 99.75% 0.25% NaOH 20% 99.585% 0.2% NaOH, 0.165% ZnO, and 0.05% CuO 0-10% 10 EXAMPLE VI Batches of asphalt were blown in a process similar to the process described in Example I. A first batch was blown as a straight-run asphalt. A second batch was blown with the addition of 1 % Na 2 CO3. A third batch was blown with the addition of 0.1% Na 2 CO 3 and 0.1% Mg(OH) 2 . The SO x emissions from the incinerator were 15 measured. The results are shown in Table VI. It can be seen that the combination of Na2CO3 and Mg(OH) 2 had a synergistic effect in reducing SOχ emissions compared to the use of Na2CO3 alone. Table VI Asphalt % Emission Reducing Addition % Reduction 20 100% None ~ 99% l% Na 2 CO 3 26% 99.8% 0.1 % Na 2 CO 3 and 0.1 % Mg(OH) 2 26% EXAMPLE VII Two different asphalt samples were tested for any detrimental effect on 25 galvanized nails. The first sample was the asphalt of Example I containing 0.2% NaOH, 0.165% ZnO, and 0.05% CuO. The second sample was an asphalt containing 1.0% NaOH. The asphalt samples were each placed into a beaker, and two galvanized nails were immersed in each asphalt sample. The asphalt samples were subjected to 14 cycles in a weatherometer according to ASTM Method D4798, to simulate weather conditions 30 encountered by roofing materials over a prolonged period. The galvanized nails were then removed from the asphalt samples and visually inspected. The galvanized nails treated in the asphalt containing 1.0% NaOH had significant areas of rust on their surface. In contrast, the galvanized nails treated in the asphalt of Example I showed no signs of rust and were not substantially affected by the asphalt. It is also expected that the asphalt would have no substantial effect on other metallic roofing materials. Another aspect ofthe invention employing a filter is illustrated in the drawings. Figure 1 schematically depicts a preferred embodiment of an asphalt air- blowing process equipment setup that incorporates a filter 50 for reducing sulfur-oxide emissions in accordance with this invention. The equipment includes an asphalt air- blown converter 51, which can be any standard or suitable converter for asphalt- processing. Preferably, the converter is adapted for air flows 52 of from about 2 meters 3 /minute to about 85 meters 3 /minute, where the volume ofthe gas is given at STP (standard temperature and pressure, i.e., 25°C and 1 atmosphere). An asphalt raw material is loaded into the converter at a temperature of from about 150°C to about 205°C. The asphalt material can be either a naturally occurring asphalt or a manufactured asphalt produced by refining petroleum. It can include straight-run fractional-derived asphalts, cracked asphalts, and asphalts derived from processing techniques such as asphalt oxidizing, propane deasphalting, steam distilling, chemically modifying, and the like. The asphalt material can be either modified or unmodified. Preferably, the asphalt material is a roofing flux. Other types of asphalt materials that may be used include specialty asphalts, such as water-proofing asphalts, battery compounds, and sealers. Blends of different kinds of asphalt can also be air- blown. An emission-reducing additive 53 is added to the asphalt to reduce sulfur- oxide emissions from the air-blowing process. While not intending to be limited by theory, it is believed that the additive reduces sulfur-oxide emissions by retaining a portion ofthe sulfur-containing compounds in the asphalt. Consequently, the sulfur- containing compounds remain as part ofthe asphalt product instead of being emitted as a waste stream in the flue gases. The emission-reducing additive can be added in any suitable manner, preferably by blending it into the asphalt prior to the air-blowing process or by adding it into the converter early in the process, preferably within about the first two hours. The emission-reducing additive is effective throughout the duration ofthe process. However, peak sulfur-oxide emissions are found generally during the first 1.5 hour of an air-blowing process without any additive. Therefore, if the emission-reducing additive is added late in the process, it will reduce emissions only from the time it is blended into the asphalt. The emission-reducing additive preferably comprises at least one compound selected from metal hydroxides, metal oxides, metal carbonates, and metal bicarbonates, where the metal is selected from sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, and aluminum. Mixtures or combinations ofthe compounds can also be used. More preferably, the additive comprises at least two of these compounds, including at least one compound where the metal is selected from sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium, and at least one compound where the metal is selected from zinc, copper, and aluminum. Even more preferably, the additive includes at least one metal hydroxide selected from sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium hydroxides, and at least one metal oxide selected from zinc, copper, and aluminum oxides. In another especially preferred embodiment, the additive includes two compounds selected from zinc oxide, copper oxide, and aluminum oxide. The copper oxide may include cuprous oxide (Cu2O) and/or cupric oxide (CuO). Most preferably, the additive includes one alkali-metal hydroxide selected from sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide, and one or two metal oxides selected from zinc oxide, copper oxide, and aluminum oxide. The alkali-metal hydroxide is widely available and is typically less expensive than the metal oxide. As discussed below, the air-blown asphalt product has certain improved properties when such an emission- reducing additive is employed. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the emission-reducing additive comprises from about 0.05% to about 0.75% alkali-metal hydroxide (NaOH or KOH), from about 0.02% to about 0.7% zinc oxide, and from about 0.01% to about 0.5% copper oxide, wherein the percentages are by weight ofthe combined asphalt and additive. More preferably, the emission-reducing additive comprises from about 0.1% to about 0.4% alkali-metal hydroxide, from about 0.05% to about 0.4% zinc oxide, and from about 0.02% to about 0.15% copper oxide. Most preferably, the emission-reducing additive comprises from about 0.1% to about 0.3% alkali hydroxide, from about 0.1% to about 0.3% zinc oxide, and from about 0.025% to about 0.1% copper oxide. Such additives have a synergistic effect in the reduction of sulfur-oxide emissions compared to the addition of a single compound. Consequently, the emission-reducing additive can contain lower levels of alkali-metal hydroxide than would otherwise be required for the same reduction in emissions. These lower levels of alkali-metal hydroxide yield asphalt materials that have little or no detrimental effect on roofing materials such as can be caused by using asphalts containing higher levels of alkali-metal hydroxide. The preferred form ofthe sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide is a concentrated water solution, preferably having at least 45 percent alkali-metal hydroxide by weight ofthe solution. The alkali-metal hydroxide can also be added as solid pellets. The mixing ofthe alkali-metal hydroxide with the asphalt is preferably carried out in the converter, and at a temperature of from about 90°C to about 260°C. An alternative mixing process is to mix the asphalt with the alkali hydroxide in a tank separate from the converter. The zinc, copper, and/or aluminum oxide is preferably added to the asphalt in particulate form, more particularly in the form of a powder. The mixing ofthe metal oxide(s) with the asphalt is preferably carried out at a temperature of from about 90°C to about 260°C. The metal oxide can be added to the asphalt in the converter, or it can be mixed with the asphalt in a tank separate from the converter. The metal oxide and the alkali-metal hydroxide materials can also be added to a recirculating asphalt reflux. An alternative is to premix the metal oxide(s) together with the alkali-metal hydroxide(s) and add the premix to the converter. The emission-reducing additive is preferably present in an amount which does not substantially change the rate or throughput ofthe asphalt air-blowing process when compared with the same process without the emission-reducing additive. Also, the emission-reducing additive contains an amount of alkali-metal hydroxide sufficient to provide the air-blown asphalt with the desired softening point, viscosity, and penetration properties. The penetration ofthe asphalt is preferably increased to a level above that which would be achieved without the emission-reducing additive. As a result, the starting asphalt can be selected from a wide variety of sources worldwide. The final asphalt product preferably has a penetration of from about 12 mm 10 to about 35 mm/10 at 25°C and a softening point of from about 80°C to about 120°C. The pliability and ductility ofthe asphalt product may also be improved. Referring again to Figure 1 , the asphalt air-blowing process involves passing air 52 or another oxygen-containing gas through the asphalt in the converter 51. Other suitable oxygen-containing gases include steam, oxygen, and ozone. A mixture of an oxygen-containing gas with an inert gas such as nitrogen or helium can also be used. The temperature ofthe asphalt during air-blowing is preferably from about 150°C to about 290°C. The air-blowing process is preferably conducted for a time of from about 1 hour to about 18 hours. If desired, a conventional catalyst such as ferric chloride can be added to the asphalt to reduce the processing time. The air flow (STP) in the converter is typically from about 14 to 360 liters per hour/liter of processed asphalt. The air passes through the asphalt and produces a gas stream--i.e., flue gases. The passing air strips amounts of some materials from the asphalt, such as hydrogen sulfide, sulfur oxides, organosulfur compounds, hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, water, ammonia, and other materials. As shown in Fig. 1 , the flue gases exit the converter and pass through ductwork to a knockout tank 54. The knockout tank is partially filled with blowing distilled oil (i.e., condensed material in the knockout tank). The flue gases are bubbled through the blowing distilled oil. In the knockout tank, large amounts of material from the flue gases are condensed, but a significant amount of gaseous material passes through uncondensed. A filter 50 is positioned between the knockout tank and the incinerator 55. The filter removes sulfur-containing compounds such as sulfur oxides by filtration ofthe cooled flue gases. The gases can be cooled either by natural heat exchange from the ductwork to the atmosphere, or by any other suitable gas-cooling operation or apparatus. The filter can be any type of filter capable of removing condensable sulfur- containing compounds from the gas stream. Preferably, the filter is a fiber-bed filter. Such filters are described in, e.g., Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Ed., vol. 1, pages 799-800 (1991). The fiber bed includes a fiber-bed element for removing the sulfur-containing compounds from the flue gases. The fiber-bed element is made from fibers that are packed either randomly or in alignment. The use of randomly oriented fiber beds is preferred. The randomly oriented fiber beds include those made with mineral fibers, such as glass fibers, polymer fibers such as polyester fibers or polypropylene fibers, and fluorocarbon fibers. An example of a type of suitable fibers is glass fibers having an average diameter of from about 1 to about 2 microns. Other fibers compatible with the emission-reducing additive and with asphalt may be used. Polymer fibers and glass fibers are preferred for use in the invention, with polymer fibers such as polyester fibers being especially preferred because of their high degree of compatibility with the emission-reducing additive. As the flue gases pass through the fiber-bed element, sulfur-containing compounds and other condensable materials are captured as small droplets of liquids by the fibers. The captured droplets coalesce on the fibers and form larger drops. The drops of liquid drain downwardly under the influence of gravity and can be collected. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate a preferred industrial-scale fiber-bed filter 10 for use in the invention. Such filters are available from Fabric Filters Air Systems, P.O. Box 6866, Portland, Oregon 97208. The filter 10 includes a cylindrical housing 11. Seven cylindrical fiber-bed elements 12 are mounted within the housing. Each ofthe elements 12 includes a pair of concentric screens 13, 14 with glass-fiber material 15 packed randomly between the screens. The area inside each ofthe elements 12 defines an interior space 16, and the area between the elements 12 defines an exterior space 17. In operation, the flue gases enter through a filter inlet 18 located near the bottom ofthe filter 10. The flue gases flow into the interior space 16 inside each ofthe fiber-bed elements 12. As the flue gases flow upward through the filter 10, they are forced outwardly through each ofthe elements 12 into the exterior space 17. The flue gases are then forced out ofthe filter 10 through an outlet 19. If desired or necessary, flow-assist means such as a fan (not shown) can be positioned at the outlet 19 to help force the flue gases through the filter. The sulfur-containing compounds are captured with the other condensable materials by the glass fibers 15 as small droplets of liquids, and coalesce to form larger drops which drain downwardly under the influence of gravity. The collected liquids exit through drain 20. In another embodiment (not shown), each ofthe fiber-bed elements can include an inner filter element and an outer filter element. The flue gases flow upward between the inner and outer filter elements, and are forced through each ofthe elements. Figures 4 and 5 illustrate a preferred smaller-scale fiber-bed filter 30 for use in another embodiment ofthe invention. Such filters are also available from Fabric Filters Air Systems. The filter 30 includes a cylindrical housing 31. A single, cylindrical fiber-bed element 32 is mounted within the housing. The element 32 is comprised of a pair of concentric screens 33, 34 with glass fibers 35 packed randomly between the screens. The area inside the fiber-bed element 32 defines an interior space 36, and the area outside the element 32 defines an exterior space 37. In operation ofthe embodiment shown in Figs. 4 and 5, the flue gases enter through a filter inlet 38 located near the bottom ofthe filter 30. The flue gases flow into the interior space 36 inside the fiber-bed element 32. As the flue gases flow upward through the filter 30, they are forced outwardly through the element 32 into the exterior space 37. The flue gases are then forced out ofthe filter through an outlet 39. A fan 40 is positioned to help pull the flue gases through the filter. The sulfur-containing compounds are captured by the glass fibers 35 with the other condensable materials as small droplets of liquids, and coalesce to form larger drops which drain downwardly and are collected through drain 41. Preferably, the fibers are packed in such a way that the fiber-bed element has a density of from about 130 kilograms/meter 3 to about 320 kilograms/meter 3 , and more preferably from about 190 kilograms/meter 3 to about 260 kilograms/meter 3 . A high filter-packing density increases the surface area ofthe fibers for removing the sulfur- containing compounds. If the density is too high, however, the fiber-bed element will undesirably restrict the flow ofthe flue gases and cause an excessive pressure drop. A fiber-bed element with fibers packed to a density of from 130 kilograms/meter 3 to 320 kilograms/meter 3 is very efficient in removing sulfur-containing compounds from the flue gases without causing an excessive pressure drop. The ratio ofthe flow rate ofthe flue gases through the filter to the surface area ofthe filter is also important for efficient removal ofthe sulfur-containing compounds. If this ratio of flow rate to surface area is too large, the filter becomes saturated with droplets too quickly and has reduced efficiency. On the other hand, if the ratio is too low, the filter may be oversized. Preferably, the filter has a flow rate to surface area ratio of from about 0.9 meter 3 /minute-meter 2 to about 9 meters 3 /minute- meter 2 and more preferably from about 1.5 meters 3 /minute-meter 2 to about 4.6 meters 3 /minute-meter 2 The flow rate ofthe flue gases is given in meters 3 /minute with the gas volume being given at STP. The surface area ofthe filter is the surface area in square meters ofthe surface ofthe filter facing the oncoming flue gases. For example, the surface area ofthe filter 30 of Figures 4 and 5 is the surface area ofthe cylindrical inner surface of element 32. Similarly, the surface area ofthe filter 10 of Figures 2 and 3 is the sum ofthe surface areas ofthe cylindrical inner surfaces of all seven ofthe elements 12. The flue gases exit the converter at a typical temperature of about 260°C. The flue gases cool as they flow through the knockout tank and the ductwork to the filter. Preferably, the flue gases are at a temperature not greater than about 121 °C when they flow through the filter, and more preferably from about 49°C to about 93 °C. The combination ofthe cooler temperature and the high surface area ofthe filter causes a significant portion ofthe remaining sulfur-containing compounds in the flue gases to condense as liquid droplets on the filter. If desired or necessary, a precooling means such as a heat exchanger can be used to cool the gas stream prior to the filter. Referring again to Figure 1 , the flue gases exit the filter 50 and pass through ductwork to an incinerator 55, which is supplied with air and fuel 57 . The incineration process reduces the concentration of volatile organic compounds in the flue gases. The combusted gas fumes are then emitted to the atmosphere through a stack 56 on the incinerator. The combination of the filter and the emission-reducing additive advantageously reduces the sulfur-oxide emissions from the air-blowing process by at least about 50% by weight over the same process without the filter and additive. Preferably, the SO x emissions are reduced at least about 65%, more preferably at least about 75%, and most preferably at least about 85%. Thus, the method of this invention is capable of greatly reducing sulfur-oxide emissions. Consequently, throughput of asphalt in the air-blowing process can be maximized while still complying with environmental regulations governing emissions. Moreover, the reduction in emissions is accomplished without generating any new waste stream, whereas known caustic scrubbing technologies for sulfur-oxide reduction typically create a new waste stream. The sulfur-oxide emissions are measured by drawing a stream of effluent from the incinerator stack through a heated sample line at 127°C, then through a gas conditioner at 2°C to remove moisture, and then through a photometric analyzer (Bovar Model 721 Photometric Analyzer, Bovar Equipment Co., P.O. Box 1440, Voltastrasse #7, 6234 Hattershein, Germany) .at a flow rate of 1 liter/minute. The sulfur-oxide emissions are measured in parts per million. The percent reduction in sulfur-oxide emissions is calculated by comparing the measured sulfur-oxide emissions ofthe inventive process with those measured from the same asphalt air-blowing process without the filter and emission-reducing additive. EXAMPLE VIII An asphalt was made from a blend of 50% by weight of Amoco roofing- flux asphalt (available from Amoco Oil Co., Whiting, Indiana) and 50% by weight of Clark roofing-flux asphalt (available from Clark Oil Co., Blue Island, Illinois). The asphalt had an initial softening point of about 38°C. Batches ofthe asphalt were air-blown to a target softening point of about 105°C. Some ofthe batches were air-blown in a conventional process without using a filter or emission-reducing additive. Other batches were air-blown in a process including a filter between the knockout tank and the incinerator. Other batches were air-blown without the filter, but with the addition of an emission-reducing additive. Finally, other batches were air-blown according to the method ofthe present invention, with both the filter and the addition of an emission-reducing additive. The filter used in the examples was the smaller-scale filter 30 illustrated in Figures 4 and 5. The fibers in the fiber-bed element 32 were glass fibers randomly packed at a density of about 225 kilograms/meter 3 . The filter had a flow rate (STP) to surface area ratio of about 1.55 meters 3 /minute-meter 2 The temperature ofthe flue gases at the filter was about 71°C. In some batches, the emission reducing-additive contained 0.1 % sodium hydroxide, 0.1% zinc oxide, and 0.05% copper oxide, by weight ofthe combined mixture of asphalt and additive. To add the sodium hydroxide, 454 kilograms ofthe asphalt were placed in the converter at 205°C, and air was blown at 2300 liters (STP) per minute. Then, 5.5 kilograms of a 50 percent by weight solution of sodium hydroxide were added. Separately, 2.7 kilograms of zinc oxide powder and 1.36 kilograms of copper oxide powder were added to 2270 kilograms of asphalt in a mix tank. The asphalt-hydroxide combination in the mix tank was then pumped to the converter and mixed with the asphalt-oxides combination therein to make a 2724-kilogram batch. In other batches, the emission-reducing additive contained 0.2% sodium hydroxide, 0.05% zinc oxide, and 0.165% copper oxide, by weight ofthe combined mixture of asphalt and additive. The emission-reducing additive was added in the same manner as described above to make a 2724-kilogram batch. The amounts of the sodium hydroxide, zinc oxide, and copper oxide added to the asphalt were adjusted to yield the indicated percentages. The batches of asphalt were air-blown in a converter with an initial air flow of about 2300 liters (STP) per minute for the first 10 minutes. When stabilized, the air flow was increased to about 4600 liters (STP) per minute for the remainder ofthe process. The batches were air-blown starting at a temperature of about 205°C and increasing gradually to a temperature of about 260°C in about 1 1/2 hour. The total time ofthe air-blowing process was about 6 hours. The sulfur-oxide emissions from the incinerator were measured as described above. The results are shown below in the following table: Table VIII SO x 5 Emissions SO x Filter SO x NaOH CuO ZnO lb./ton Reduction Reduction wt.% wt.% wt.% Filter (kg/1000 kg) wt.% wt.% - - - No 0.300 (150) - - - Yes 0.188 (94) 37% 10 - - - No 0.276 (138) 0.10 0.05 0.10 No 0.080 (40) 71% 0.10 0.05 0.10 Yes 0.047 (23.5) 83% 41% - - - No 0.220 (110) 0.20 0.05 0.165 No 0.067 (33.5) 70% 15 0.20 0.05 0.165 Yes 0.049 (24.5) 78% 27% - - - No 0.276 (138) 0.20 0.05 0.165 . No 0.093 (46.5) 66% 0.20 0.05 0.165 Yes 0.043 (21.5) 84% 54% The results for the inventive and comparative batches are given above in 20 four groups (separated by solid horizontal lines). For the first group of batches, the asphalt was air-blown by a conventional process without using either a filter or an emission-reducing additive, and also by a process which included the use of a filter. It can be seen that the filter reduced sulfur-oxide emissions by 37%. In the second group of batches, the asphalt was air-blown by a 25 conventional process, by a process including addition of an emission-reducing additive but no filter, and by the inventive process including both the filter and an emission- reducing additive. It can be seen that the emission-reducing additive alone reduced sulfur-oxide emissions by 71%. The process according to the present invention, using both the filter and the emission-reducing additive, reduced sulfur oxide emissions by 30 83%. The addition ofthe filter reduced sulfur-oxide emissions by an additional 41% compared to the level of emissions with the emission-reducing additive alone. By comparing the results ofthe first group of batches with the second group of batches, it can be seen that the filter maintained an efficiency in reducing sulfur- oxide emissions with or without the addition ofthe emission reducing-additive. This was not predictable because the addition ofthe emission-reducing additive could have substantially reduced the performance ofthe filter. It has been found that the methods employing both the filter and the emission-reducing additive provide optimal reduction of sulfur-oxide emissions. Accordingly, the present invention advantageously reduces the sulfur-oxide emissions from the air-blowing process to a great extent. The results are similar for the third and fourth groups of batches. The combination ofthe filter and emission-reducing additive resulted in the greatest total reduction in sulfur-oxide emissions, i.e., a reduction of 78% and 84%, respectively. It should be understood that, although described herein as a method for reducing sulfur-oxide emissions from an asphalt air-blowing process, the invention may also be practiced with other blowing processes that produce sulfur-oxide emissions. Also, the invention may be practiced with other sulfur-containing organic materials in addition to asphalt. And the invention may also reduce the emissions of materials other than sulfur oxides. Furthermore, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit. Thus, the invention is intended to be defined not by the foregoing description, but by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method for reducing sulfur-oxide emissions from an asphalt blowing process comprising: combining asphalt and an emission-reducing additive comprising at least one additive compound selected from the group consisting of metal hydroxides, metal oxides, metal carbonates, and metal bicarbonates, wherein the metal is selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, and aluminum; subjecting the asphalt to a blowing process that produces a gas stream containing sulfur-containing compounds; passing the gas stream through a filter that condenses and removes at least a portion ofthe sulfur-containing compounds; and subjecting the filtered gas stream to an incineration process; wherein the combination ofthe filter and the emission-reducing additive reduces sulfur-oxide emissions from the asphalt blowing process by at least about 50% by weight over the same process without the filter and emission-reducing additive. 2. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein said filter is a fiber filter. 3. A method as defined in claim 2, wherein said fiber filter comprises a fibrous filter material including polymer fibers or glass fibers. 4. A method as defined in claim 2, wherein said fiber filter comprises a fibrous filter material having a packed fiber density of from about 130 kilograms/meter 3 to about 320 kilograms/meter 3 . 5. A method as defined in claim 4, wherein said packed fiber density is from about 190 kilograms/meter 3 to about 260 kilograms/meter 3 . 6. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein said passing comprises forcing the gas stream through the filter at a ratio of gas flow rate to filter surface area of from about 0.9 meter 3 /minute-meter 2 to about 9 meters 3 /minute-meter 2 . 7. A method as defined in claim 6, wherein said ratio is from about 1.5 meters 3 /minute-meter 2 to about 4.6 meters 3 /minute-meter 2 . 8. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the gas stream is at a temperature of not greater than about 121°C during said passing through the filter. 9. A method as defined in claim 8, wherein said temperature ofthe gas stream is from about 49°C to about 93 °C. 10. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein said filter is a fiber filter including fibers packed at a density of from about 130 kilograms/meter 3 to about 320 kilograms/meter 3 , and the ratio ofthe flow rate of the gas stream to the surface area ofthe filter is from about 1.5 meters 3 /minute-meter 2 to about 4.6 meters 3 /minute-meter 2 . 11. A method as defined in claim 10, wherein the sulfur-oxide emissions are reduced by at least about 75% by weight over the same process without the filter and the emission-reducing additive. 12. A method as defined in claim 10, wherein said emission-reducing additive is added in an amount of from about 0.1% to about 2.0% by weight ofthe combined asphalt and emission-reducing additive. 13. A method as defined in claim 10, wherein said emission-reducing additive comprises one or more said additive compounds where the metal is selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium, and one or more other said additive compounds where the metal is selected from the group consisting of zinc, copper, and aluminum. 14. A method as defined in claim 13, wherein the one or more said additive compounds includes a metal hydroxide selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, and magnesium hydroxide, and the one or more other said additive compounds includes at least one metal oxide selected from the group consisting of zinc oxide, copper oxide, and aluminum oxide. 15. A method as defined in claim 14, wherein said metal hydroxide is an alkali-metal hydroxide selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide, and said at least one metal oxide includes two different metal oxides selected from the group consisting of zinc oxide, copper oxide, and aluminum oxide. 16. A method as defined in claim 15, wherein said emission-reducing additive comprises, by weight ofthe combined asphalt and the emission-reducing additive, from about 0.05% to about 0.25% alkali-metal hydroxide, from about 0.02% to about 0.2% zinc oxide, and from about 0.01% to about 0.05% copper oxide. 17. A method as defined in claim 4, wherein said emission-reducing additive comprises, by weight ofthe combined asphalt and the emission-reducing additive, from about 0.05% to about 0.25% alkali-metal hydroxide, from about 0.02% to about 0.2% zinc oxide, and from about 0.01% to about 0.05% copper oxide. 18. A method for reducing sulfur-oxide emissions from an asphalt blowing process comprising: adding to an asphalt an emission-reducing additive comprising at least one member selected from the group consisting of metal hydroxides, metal oxides, metal carbonates, and metal bicarbonates, and mixtures thereof, wherein the metal is selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, aluminum, and mixtures thereof, to form an asphalt- additive mixture; subjecting the asphalt-additive mixture to a blowing process that produces a gas stream including sulfur-containing compounds; passing the gas stream through a fiber filter to remove at least a portion ofthe sulfur-containing compounds, wherein the filter comprises fibers packed at a density of from about 130 kilograms/meter 3 to about 320 kilograms/meter 3 , the ratio ofthe flow rate ofthe gas stream through the filter to the surface area ofthe filter is from about 0.9 meter 3 /minute-meter 2 to about 9 meters 3 /minute-meter 2 , and the gas stream is at a temperature not greater than about 121°C when passed through the filter; and subjecting the filtered gas stream to an incineration process; wherein the combination ofthe filter and the emission-reducing additive reduces sulfur-oxide emissions from the asphalt blowing process by at least about 50% by weight over the same process without the filter and emission-reducing additive. 19. A method as defined in claim 18, wherein the sulfur-oxide emissions are reduced by at least about 75% by weight over the same process without the filter and the emission-reducing additive. 20. A method for reducing sulfur-oxide emissions from an asphalt blowing process comprising: adding to an asphalt an emission reducing-additive, in an amount of from about 0.1% to about 2.0% by weight ofthe asphalt combined with the emission-reducing additive, the emission-reducing additive comprising at least one metal hydroxide selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, and magnesium hydroxide, and at least one metal oxide selected from the group consisting of zinc oxide, copper oxide, and aluminum oxide; subjecting the asphalt to an air-blowing process that produces a gas stream including sulfur-containing compounds; passing the gas stream through a filter to condense and remove at least a portion ofthe sulfur-containing compounds; and subjecting the filtered gas stream to an incineration process. 21. A method for reducing emissions from an asphalt blowing process comprising adding to asphalt an emission-reducing additive in an amount sufficient to reduce the SO x emissions from the blowing process by at least about 25 percent by weight over the same process without the additive, wherein the additive comprises: (a) at least one compound selected from the group consisting of metal hydroxides, metal oxides, metal carbonates, and metal bicarbonates, where the metal is selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium; and (b) at least one compound selected from the group consisting of metal hydroxides, metal oxides, metal carbonates, and metal bicarbonates, where the metal is selected from the group consisting of zinc, copper, and aluminum. 22. A method as defined in claim 21 , wherein said at least one compound (a) comprises at least one metal hydroxide selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, and magnesium hydroxide, and said at least one compound (b) comprises at least one metal oxide selected from the group consisting of zinc oxide, copper oxide, and aluminum oxide. 23. A method as defined in claim 21 , wherein the additive further comprises (c) a compound different from said compounds (a) and (b), and selected from the group consisting of metal hydroxides, metal oxides, metal carbonates, and metal bicarbonates, where the metal is selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, and aluminum. 24. A method as defined in claim 23, wherein: said compound (a) is sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide or magnesium hydroxide; said compound (b) is zinc oxide, copper oxide or aluminum oxide; and said compound (c) is zinc oxide, copper oxide or aluminum oxide. 25. A method as defined in claim 24, wherein said compound (a) is an alkali hydroxide selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide. 26. A method as defined in claim 25, wherein said compound (b) is zinc oxide and said compound (c) is copper oxide. 27. A method as defined in claim 26, wherein the alkali hydroxide (a) is present in an amount of from about 0.05% to about 0.75% by weight ofthe combined 5 asphalt and additive, the zinc oxide (b) is present in an amount of from about 0.02% to about 0.7% by weight ofthe combined asphalt and additive, and the copper oxide (c) is present in an amount of from about 0.01% to about 0.5% by weight ofthe combined asphalt and additive. 28. A method as defined in claim 26, wherein the alkali hydroxide (a) 10 is present in an amount of from about 0.1% to about 0.25% by weight ofthe combined asphalt and additive, the zinc oxide (b) is present in an amount of from about 0.1% to about 0.2% by weight ofthe combined asphalt and additive, and the copper oxide (c) is present in an amount of from about 0.025% to about 0.05% by weight ofthe combined asphalt and additive. 15 29. A method as defined in claim 28, in which d e alkali hydroxide (a) is sodium hydroxide. 30. A method as defined in claim 28, in which the alkali hydroxide is added in the form of an aqueous solution containing at least 45% by weight ofthe alkali hydroxide, and the zinc oxide and copper oxide are added in the form of a particulate 20 solid. 31. A method as defined in claim 30, wherein: said adding comprises mixing a portion ofthe asphalt with the alkali hydroxide in a converter at a temperature of from about 90°C to about 260°C to form a first mixture, separately mixing the zinc oxide and the copper oxide with a portion ofthe asphalt in a tank at a temperature of from about 25 90°C to about 260°C to form a second mixture, and combining the first and second mixtures to form an asphalt-additive mixture; and air-blowing the asphalt-additive mixture. 32. A method as defined in claim 21, wherein the additive is added to the asphalt in an amount sufficient to reduce the SO x emissions from the blowing process 30 by at least about 40 percent by weight over the same process without the additive. 33. A method as defined in claim 21 , wherein the additive is added to the asphalt in an amount sufficient to reduce the SO x emissions from the blowing process by at least about 50 percent by weight over the same process without the additive. 34. A method as defined in claim 21 , wherein the asphalt containing the additive has no substantial effect on metallic roofing materials when subjected to fourteen cycles in a weatherometer according to ASTM Method D4798. 35. A method as defined in claim 21 , wherein the additive is added to the asphalt in an amount increasing NO x emissions from the blowing process by not greater than about 30 percent by weight over the same process without the additive. 36. A method as defined in claim 21 , wherein the additive is added to the asphalt prior to the blowing process. 37. A method for reducing emissions from an asphalt-blowing process comprising adding to asphalt an emission-reducing additive in an amount sufficient to reduce the SO x emissions from the blowing process by at least about 25% by weight over the same process without the additive, where the additive comprises: (a) at least three compounds selected from the group consisting of metal hydroxides, metal oxides, metal carbonates, and metal bicarbonates, where the metal is selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, and aluminum; (b) at least one metal hydroxide selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, and magnesium hydroxide; and (c) at least one metal oxide selected from the group consisting of zinc oxide, copper oxide, and aluminum oxide. 38. A method for reducing emissions from an asphalt-blowing process comprising adding to the asphalt an emission-reducing additive comprising from about 0.05% to about 0.75% of an alkali hydroxide selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and mixtures thereof, from about 0.02% to about 0.7% zinc oxide, and from about 0.01% to about 0.5% copper oxide, by weight based on the combined weight ofthe asphalt and the additive.

Inventors: FRANZEN MICHAEL R, MARZARI JORGE A, MIRROW JAY H, SMITH JEFFREY W, TRUMBORE DAVID C, FRANZEN, MICHAEL, R., MARZARI, JORGE, A., MIRROW, JAY, H., SMITH, JEFFREY, W., TRUMBORE, DAVID, C.
Applicants: OWENS CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP, OWENS CORNING
Application year: 1997
Main classification: C10C1
IPC codes: B01D53, C10C3