SELECTION AND/OR ENHANCEMENT OF RESIDENT MICROORGANISMS IN THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT

Abstract: Improved method of enhancing a population of one or more target microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract of an animal, the improvement comprising providing to the animal a selected modified or unmodified resistant starch or mixtures thereof, such that the one or more microorganisms will selectively utilise the starch and/or increase in number and/or activity in the gastrointestinal tract, either uniformly throughout the gastrointestinal tract or at specific site or regions.

Description: Selection and/or Enhancement of Resident Microorganisms in the Gastrointestinal Tract Technical Field This invention relates to an improved method of enhancing a population of one or more target microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract, especially the small intestine and the large bowel, of animals and humans. Background Art It is the contention of many scientists that the health and well being of people can be positively or negatively influenced by the microorganisms which inhabit the gastrointestinal tract, and in particular, the large bowel. These microorganisms through the production of toxins, metabolic by¬ products, short chain fatty acids, and the like affect the physiological condition of the host. The constitution and quantity of the gut microflora can be influenced by conditions or stress induced by disease, life style, travel, and other factors. If microorganisms which positively affect the health and well being of the individual can be encouraged to populate the large bowel, this should improve the physiological well being of the host. The present inventors have realised that it would be desirable to provide a medium that would function to promote the growth and/or activity of target microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract of animals including humans. Disclosure of Invention The present invention consists in an improved method of enhancing a population of one or more target microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract of an animal, the improvement comprising providing to the animal a selected modified or unmodified resistant starch or mixtures thereof, such that the one or more microorganisms will selectively utilise the starch and/or increase in number and/or activity in the gastrointestinal tract. The target population of microorganism may be enhanced throughout the gastrointestinal tract of the animal or targeted at specific sites of the gastrointestinal tract. It will be appreciated that the present invention will be suitable for any animal that requires alteration of its gastrointestinal flora. The present method is particularly suitable for use in humans. The starches suitable include resistant or high amylose starches and modified forms thereof. The animal or human may be fed the selected resistant starch or the starch may be incorporated in a probiotic composition. As used in this specification, "resistant starch" includes those forms defined as RSl, RS2, RS3 and RS4 as defined in Brown, McNaught and Moloney (1995) Food Australia 47: 272-275. Either modified or unmodified resistant starches or mixtures thereof are used in this invention. The advantage of resistant starch is that it is largely not degraded until it reaches the large bowel. Therefore it provides a readily available substrate for fermentation by the target microorganisms as soon as they arrive in the large bowel. In both cases, a preferred form of resistant starch is a high amylose starch particularly high amylose starches as disclosed and taught in WO 94/03049 and WO 94/14342, the contents of which are incorporated into this specification for the purposes of convenient cross-reference. In WO 94/03049 and WO 94/14342, high amylose starches are disclosed which are resistant starches and include maize starch having an amylose content of 50% w/w or more, particularly 80% w/w or more, rice or wheat starch having an amylose content of 27% w/w or more and; particular granular size ranges of starches having an amylose content of 50% or more and enhanced resistant starch content, these starches including maize, barley, and legumes. This invention is not, however, limited to these forms of resistant starch. For example, other forms of resistant starch are derived from sources such as bananas and tubers such as potatoes and modified forms thereof. It may be advantageous to also chemically modify the starch to, for instance, alter the charge density or hydrophobicity of the granule and/or granule surface to enhance the attachment compatibility between the microorganism and the resistant starch. Chemical modifications, such as etherification, esterification, acidification and the like are well known in this art as being suitable chemical treatments. To modify the degree of enzyme susceptibility of the resistant starch the conformation or structure of the starch can be altered. Examples include acid or enzyme thinning and cross bonding using difunctional reagents. The starches may be modified physically by, for example, crystallisation. It is also within the scope of this invention to subject enzymatically treated resistant starches to chemical modification as described above. As used herein, Hi-maize™ (trade mark) refers to a high amylose starch obtained from Starch Australasia Limited. In order that the present invention may be more clearly understood, preferred forms thereof will be described with reference to the following figure and examples. Brief Description of Drawings Figure 1 shows comparison of the co-culturing of Lactobacillus acidophilus with Bifidobacteήum strain X8AT2 in glucose and amylose starch medium. Figure 2 shows enumeration of number of bifidobacteria in starch based medium inoculated with human faecal homogenates and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 12 hours. Individual starches according to the description in Table 4. Figure 3 shows enumeration of number of amylolytic bacteria in starch based media inoculated with human faecal homogenates and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 12 hours. Individual starches as in Table 4. Figure 4 shows enumeration of major bacterial groups in stomach contents from mice on various starch based diets (Table 4). Figure 5 shows enumeration of major bacterial groups in ileal contents from mice on various starch based diets (Table 4). Figure 6 shows enumeration of major bacterial groups caecal contents from mice on various starch based diets (Table 4) Figure 7 shows enumeration of major bacterial group in colon contents from mice on various starch based diets (Table 4). Figure 8 shows the total anaerobic microbial population of ileal origin, 9 hours post inoculation in media containing starch nos 4, 6, 8, 9 and glucose. Figure 9 shows the total anaerobic microbial population of caecal origin, 9 hours post inoculation in media containing starch nos 4. 6, 8. 9 and glucose. Modes for Carrying Out the Invention Example 1 By measuring the amylase activity of specific intestinal bacteria when grown in standard laboratory medium containing glucose, starch (amylopectin) or resistant starch (amylose) added to a defined medium (composition included in Table 1 at a final concentration of 10 mg/ml), one can show that many of the intestinal bacteria produce amylase which can utilise the resistant starch (Table 2). In addition, the specific growth rates when six different intestinal bacteria were grown on glucose, amylose, amylopectin, Hi-maize™ and carboxymethylated resistant starch were determined (Table 3). The various bacteria tested grew at very different rates to each other, indicative that individual bacterial groups or species will be selectively enhanced by the form of starch used. Table 1. Composition of medium used for growing intestinal strains of bacteria. Table 2. Amylase activity after growth of intestinal isolates on starch and resistant starch. Bacteria Glucose Amylopectin Amylose 1. Supernatant Cl. butyήcum 0.592 0.987 0.317 Bad. fragilis 0.064 0.563 0.927 Bif. bifidum 0.506 0.131 0.293 Bif. pseudolongum 0.087 0.542 0.423 E. limosum 0.202 0.568 0.794 Bad. vulgatus 0.196 0.602 0.380 2. Cell Extract Cl. butyricum 0.000 0.000 0.021 Bad. fragilis 0.045 1.038 2.018 Bif. bifidum 0.295 4.271 9.270 Bif. pseudolongum 0.664 3.855 12.685 E. limosum 0.375 0.491 0.039 Bad. vulgatus 0.229 1.644 3.381 Table 3. Specific growth rates. Bacteria Glucose Amylose Amylopectin Hi Maize Modified starch A 955 D2 CI. butyricum 1.348 1.091 1.326 1.071 0.986 Bif. bifidum 0.8.6 0.509 0.721 0.746 0.704 Bif. pseudolongum 0.807 0.575 0.712 0.692 0.658 Bad. vulgatus 0.834 0.331 0.680 0.501 0.598 Bad. fragilis 0.645 0.355 0.490 0.398 0.448 E. limosum 0.570 0.338 0.632 0.421 0.320 Example 2 A number of modifications of the resistant starch (Hi-maize™) (Table 4) were used in the defined growth medium presented in Table 1. The intestinal isolates were then inoculated and the starch concentration determined after 22 h incubation as an indication of the extent of utilisation. Total carbohydrate was estimated using phenol-sulphuric acid assay. Surprisingly, a modification often resulted in altered utilisation of the starch as can be seen in Table 5. Table 4. Starch identification Starch Destination Identification Analysis 1 A939 (D19) Hydroxypropylated DS* = 0.13 2 A938 (C79) Acetylated Acetyl value = 2.69% 3 A961 (D8) Octenyl succinated OSA value = 4.73% 4 A955 (D2) Carboxymethylated Carboxyl value = 1.0% 5 A960 (D7) Succinated Succinyl value = 3.97% 6 HA 008 (D2118) Unmodified - 7 A993 D42 Succinated Succinyl value = 4.1% 8 A956 (Dl) Carboxymethylated Carboxyl value = 2.0% 9 A995 (D57) Acetylated Acetyl value = 4.0% 10 A965 (D9) Hydroxypropylated DS = 0.13 degree of substitution Table 5. Concentration of starch after incubation for 22 hours. Starches Bacteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cl. butyricum 3.364 1.829 2.354 3.714 1.418 2.175 2.980 3.121 2.648 - Bif. pseudolongum 5.532 4.029 5.091 3.658 6.843 5.308 5.130 4.157 4.899 4.463 Bif. bifidum 5.245 4.132 7.035 4.503 5.437 4.950 4.375 4.720 5.091 5.454 Bad. fragilis 4.081 5.372 7.995 4.669 7.547 6.971 6.140 5.001 7.547 5.660 Bad. vulgatus - 8.570 7.419 6.843 8.954 9.210 10.489 6.108 6.332 6.908 Bif. strain X8AT2 10.106 6.492 10.00 5.532 6.268 7.931 9.850 6.843 5.820 5.916 Lact. acidophilus 8.75 10.501 10.50 10.50 92.84 10.50 10.07 10.50 10.50 95.54 Lact. helviticus 52.76 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 99.68 10.50 10.50 Starch concentrations after 22 hours incubation (mg/ml) 1: A. 939 (D19) Hydroxypropylated; 2: A. 938 (C79) Acetylated; 3: A.961 (D8) Octenyl succinated; 4: A.955 (D2) Carboxymethylated; 5: A.960 (D7) Succinated; 6: HA 008 (D2118) Unmodified; 7: A993 D42 Succinated; 8: A956 (Dl) Carboxymethylated; 9: A995 (D57) Acetylated; 10: A965 (D9) Hydroxypropylated; Example 3 The effect of co-culture with amylolytic Bif. X8AT2 on the growth of Lactobacillus sp in the amylose starch medium The growth of Lαcf. acidophilus in the Hi-maize™ containing medium with or without the present of Bif. X8AT2 was compared. The growth medium contained 1% Hi-maize™ starch or glucose as the growth carbon and energy source. The medium was autoclaved at 121°C for 15 minutes and strictly anaerobic conditions were used during the medium preparation. Overnight cultures (0.1 ml) of Lact. acidophilus and Bif. X8AT2 were inoculated into the serum tubes containing either glucose or Hi- maize™ starch based media. For the control Lact. acidophilus only was inoculated into the serum tubes. The tubes were then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Samples were taken at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours to enumerate the population of Lact. acidophilus by using standard series dilution method. The population of Lact. acidophilus was expressed as CFU/ml on MRS agar plates. Since Lact. acidophilus can not degrade Hi-maize™ starch, the growth of Lact. acidophilus in the defined medium containing Hi-maize ™ starch as the sole carbon source was very slow and resulted in low biomass. The improvement of the growth of Lact. acidophilus in Hi-maize™ medium was observed when the strain was co cultured with the Hi-maize™ starch- utiliser, Bif. strain X8AT2 (Fig. 1). As can be seen in Figure 1, a synergistic effect is demonstrated when the Bifidobacterial strain is inoculated with the Lactobacillus. Example 4 Mice were fed either normal mouse diet or a prepared diet containing either waxy starch, Hi-maize™ or modified Hi-maize™ (carboxymethylated) and were orally dosed with 200 microlitres of Bifidobacteήum sp strain X8AT2 or Bifidobacteήum bifidum cultures. The composition of the mouse prepared diet is included in Table 6. Faecal samples were collected after continuous feeding from day 3 to day 8 of the diet plus the bifidobacteria. The major bacterial groups were enumerated using selective media and the total bacteria output for the groups were calculated. As can be seen in Table 7, Ba eroides numbers were enhanced significantly in mice when they were fed a modified resistant starch plus bifidobacteria compared to controls, which include mice fed resistant starch plus bifidobacteria. While it is established that Baderoides of intestinal origin can ferment both starch (amylopectin) and resistant starch (amylose) reviewed by Salyers and eedle (Salvers & Leedle. 1983), it is surprising to discover that a carboxymethylated amylose can significantly increase growth of the Baderoides. Table 6. Diets for mice probiotic feeding experiments. Test Groups A B C D E Starch Waxy HA Carboxy HA None -methyl 400 400 400 400 Casein 200 200 200 200 Canola oil 25 25 25 25 Sunflower oil 25 25 25 25 Sucrose 150 150 150 150 Wheat bran 100 100 100 100 Gelatin 20 20 20 20 Mineral mix 67 67 67 67 Vitamin mix 13 13 13 13 Methionine 2 2 2 2 Bacterial strain X8AT2 X8AT2 X8AT2 None X8AT2 Waxy=waxy maize; HA=High amylose starch; Carboxy-methyl=Carboxymethylated high amylose starch. All weights are in grams. Bacterial cultures (100 microlitres per day) were orally ingested by the mice with starch containing meals. Table 7. Bacteroides population in mice feeding study (total bacteria output/per day per mice). Starches Group A Group B Group C Group D Group E Bacteroides 9.163 ± 0.42 8.961 + 0.40 9.952 + 0.357 8.961 ± 0.576 8.463 + 0.569 Mean Diff. (compare to group A) A-B: 0.202 A-C: -0.789 A-D: 0.202 A-E: 0.699 none p<0.05 none p<0.05 F-test Mean Diff. (compare to group E) A-E: -0.699 E-B: -0.498 E-C: -1.489 E-D: -0.497 p<0.05 p<0.05 p<0.05 p<0.05 F-test Group A: Waxy starch plus X8AT2 - Bifidobacteria human isolates: Group B: Hi-rnaize™ starch plus X8AT2; Group C: Carboxymethylated resistant starch plus X8AT2; Group D: Hi-maize™ starch plus Bif. bifidum; Group E: Normal mice diet plus X8AT2 Example 5 a) Four groups of six mice (Balb/c, SPF) were continuously fed with semisynthetic diets for 4 weeks. Group A received 40% waxy starch in the diet, and groups C and E had 40% modified starches D2 and D5 , respectively in their diets. Group D was the Hi-maize™ starch group and group B was assigned as the control to be fed with normal mice diet. Two faecal samples were collected at the end of experimental period (4 weeks) to enumerate the population of Bifidobacterium by using propionic acid agar. Bifidobacteria were further identified by cell morphology under light microscopy. The population of Bifidobacterium was expressed as total output per day per mice. The results from three experiments indicated that the specific pathogen free (SPF) mice used in the experiment were free of detectable bifidobacteria (<10 3 ) and continued to be so for the 2 months as control animals (Table 8). It is very surprising, however, to find that when the mice shifted from normal mice diet to the starch diets, the population of bifidobacteria increased significantly. The degree of increase depended on the type of starch incorporated into the diets. Hi-maize™ starch diet yielded the greatest numbers of native bifidobacteria in the mice faeces, followed by the waxy starch diet. Modified Hi-maize™ starch D57 demonstrated better results in the stimulation of the growth of bifidobacteria than modified Hi- maize™ starch D2. The results from previous experiments indicated that D2 starch mainly sustained the good growth of Bacteroides. The statistical analysis of the data is also presented in Table 8. After the first stage of experiment in which the mice were fed with the experimental diet for 4 weeks, 200 ul of Bif. X8AT2 was orally dosed into mice for 5 days. Numbers oi Lactobacillus from all of groups were quantified in the mice faeces at both stages of experiments by using Rogosa agar. The cell morphology of Lactobacillus were also checked under phase-contract microscopy. It can be seen that the highest fermentability of starch was detected with Cl. buty ή um. Bif. bifidum and Bif. psuedologum are also capable of hydrolysing all of the starches, while human isolate Bif. X8AT2 preferred starch nos. 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 10. Bad. fragilis has a stronger amylolytic capability to degrade starches than Bad. vulgatus. The poorest genus is Lactobacillus, since both strains tested could only partially utilise the modified Hi-maize™ starch 1. All of the mice were heavily colonised with dense populations of Lactobacillus. The influence of diets on faecal population of Lactobacillus is shown in Table 9. In general, none of the starch diets supported the increased growth of native Lactobacillus, in comparison with normal mice diets. Particularly low numbers of Lactobacillus were detected in the groups of mice fed with modified starches D2 and D57. The population of Lactobacillus, however, increased in the group of mice fed with Hi-maize™ diet when amylolytic bifidobacterial strain X8AT2 was associated with the mice. Table 8. Native population of Bifidobacteria in mice fed with different starches diets (CFU log 10/g faeces) Starches Group A Group B Group C Group D Group E Bifidobacterium 7.48 ± 0.481 O ± O 1.475 ± 2.174 8.235 ± 0.46 6.432 ± 0.566 Positive mice in the test group 6/6 0/6 2/6 6/6 6/6 Mean Diff. (compare to group A) A-B: 7.47 A-C: -6.005 A-D: -0.755 A-E: -1.048 F-test p<0.05 p<0.05 none none CO Mean Diff. (compare to group B) B-A: -7.48 B-C: - 1.475 B-D:-8.235 B-E: -6.432 F-test p<0.05 p<0.05 p<0.05 p<0.05 Group A: Waxy starch Group B: Normal mice diet Group C: Carboxymethylated amylose starch Group D: Hi-ruaize™ starch Group E: Acetylated maize starch Table 9. Lactobacillus population in the mice fed with different starches diets (CFU log 10/g wet faeces) Starches Group A Group B Group C Group D Group E Lactobacillus Period 1: 7.596 ± 0.477 8.113 ± 0.532 7.423 ± 0.295 7.858 ± 0.367 7.309 ± 0.326 Fed with experimental diets for 4 weeks Mean Diff. (compare to group B) B-A: 0.517 B-C: -0.690 B-D: -0.255 B-E: -0.804 F-test none p<0.05 none p<0.05 Period 2: 7.823 ± 0.397 7.782 ± 0.477 7.501 ± 0.319 8.031 ± 0.529 7.451 ± 0.673 Experimental diets plus Bifidobacterium X8AT2 Mean Diff. (compare to group D) D-A: 0.208 D-B: 0.249 D-C: 0.531 D-E: -0.580 F-test none none p<0.05 p<0.05 Example 6 a) Material from human colon was diluted Wilkins Chargren broth (1:1000). The mixtures were incubated 37°C for 24 h and sampled at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h post inoculation. The type of resident starch or modifications thereof will induce an alteration or stimulation of resident microbes. After 9 h incubation, Starch nos. 8 and 9, induced an increase in the bifidobacterial population (Figure 2) followed by the bifidobacterial populations of cultures supplemented with Starch no. 1, 2, 10 and 7. Cultures supplemented with Starch no. 6 were less benefited, resulting in a relatively poor development of the bifidobacterial population. Starch no. 3 had only a moderate beneficial effect on bifidobacterial growth. A large stimulation of the amylolytic microbial population (Figure 3) was detected when either Starch nos. 8, 4, 10 or 9 were used as a source of carbon. In contrast, poor development of the bifidobacterial population was noted in cultures supplied with Starch nos. 6, 3, 7 and 5. A close correlation between growth response of amylolytic and bifidobacterial populations was noted (Figures 2 and 3). Example 7 Degradation of Starch nos. 1-10 by human faecal microorganisms The degradation of resistant starch and modifications thereof (Table 4) by human faecal microbes was studied. After 12 and 24 h incubation of faecal homogenates in media based on the starches in Table 4 the various degree of utilisation was determined (Table 10). There was a great variation in resistance to degradation. Starch nos. 1 and 8 were most efficiently degraded by the human faecal microbiota, which resulted in 0.31 and 1.8%, respectively starch remaining in the cultures 24 h post inoculation. Starch nos. 7 and 9 were less efficiently degraded, giving about 9% remaining starch in the final culture 24 h post inoculation. The most resistant starch was Starch no. 6. The difference in resistance to degradation was even more significant in cultures incubated for 12 h. At this point (12 h), six starches were assayed: Starch nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9. Starch no. 1 was of the starches the most easily degraded (2.74% remaining), followed by Starch no. 8 (5.3%). Starch no. 4 (23.4%), Starch no. 9 (44.5%), Starch no. 7 (79.2%) and Starch no. 6, the one most resistant to degradation. No degradation of starch no. 6 could be detected 12 h post inoculation (Table 10). Table 10. Degradation of Starch nos. 1-10 by human faecal microorganisms . Type of Starch Residual starch (%) (Table 4) 12 h post inoculation 24 h post inoculation 1 2.73±0.46 0.31±0.10 2 N/A 7.07±1.24 3 N/A 8.57+1.08 4 23.4±4.72 5.59±1.73 5 N/A 11.8±2.86 6 119.±17.4 29.9±8.57 7 79.2±11.3 9.01+2.85 8 5,26±1.48 1.76±0.34 9 44.5±1.58 7.55±0.95 10 N/A 9.38±1.80 Example 8 Hi-maize™ can be modified to various levels with chemical reagents, such as acetic anhydride. The degree of susceptibility to in vitro digestion by bacterial alpha-amylase and amyloglucosidase of Hi-maize™ and three acetylated starches from Hi-Maize™ was ascertained using the Megazyme Total Starch Assay Procedure (AA/AMG 6/95). Each starch was solubilised and the enzyme resistant "residue" recovered by centrifugation. The residue was then solubilised using DMSO and assayed as per the Megazyme resistant starch method. The results are shown in Table 11. Table 11. Resistance of acetylated Hi-maize™ starch to amylase digestion * dry solids basis Table 12. Degradation of Starch nos. 1-10 by human faecal microorganisms [Percentage starch degraders of total faecal population growing on amylose plates (Sigma)] at various times post inoculation. Amylolytic isotates in percentage of total CFU 3 h 6 h 9 h 12 h Starch 1 100 56 56 30 Starch 2 90 36 69 65 Starch 3 80 35 28 12 Starch 4 87 35 61 29 Starch 5 81 50 54 28 Starch 6 88 58 16 7 Starch 7 63 47 48 10 Starch 8 72 66 67 56 Starch 9 77 75 80 65 Starch 10 72 73 58 21 Example 9 This example demonstrates that various modifications of resistant starch as presented in Table 4 induce the development of microbes with varying amylolytic activity. (Starch no. 1 and 8 are soluble and could not be assessed in this study). This was assessed by relating the number of isolates that produced clearing zones on amylose agar to the total population (CFU) on amylose plates (in % of total), and the degree of amylolytic activity expressed by amylolytic isolates. This was assessed by measuring clearing zones developed around colonies with amylolytic activity. There was a great variation in capacity the human faecal microbiota to degrade the different starches. Starch nos. 2 and 3 were degraded by the highest percentage of the population (65%) followed by Starch no 8 which was degraded by 56% of the population (Table 12). Starches 3 and 6 were degraded by only 12% and 7% respectively. Production of Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFA) Compared to the glucose control, the addition of starches (except Starch no. 11) resulted in a significant increase in the production of all investigated SCF A's. The production of n-butyric acid was greatest in media containing Starch no. 8, followed by Starch no. 4, Starch no. 5, Starch no. 2, Starch no. 6 and media containing Starch no. 10 (Table 13). The production of acetic acid was greatest in media containing Starch no. 8, followed by Starch no. 1, Starch no. 2, Starch no. 10, Starch no. 5 and media containing Starch no. 9. The production of propionic acid was greatest in media containing Starch no. 8, followed by Starch no. 3, Starch no. 9, Starch no. 6, Starch no. 4 and media containing Starch no. 2. The production of iso-butyric acid was greatest in media containing glucose, followed by Starch no. 7 and Starch no. 3. Iso-butyric acid could not be detected in cultures supplied with any other starches. The production of iso-valeric acid was greatest in media containing Starch no. 6, followed by media containing Starch no. 4, Starch no. 9, Starch no. 8. Starch no. 5 and glucose. Starch no. 8 promoted production of all major SCFA's (acetic, propionic and butyric acid), more that any of the other starch, that resulted in a butyric acid concentration that was about 1.5 times greater than for Starch no. 3 (Table 13). Table 13. Production of Short Chain Fatty Acids from Starch nos. 1-11 and glucose, 24 h post inoculation with human faecal material. Short Chain Fatty Acid (mM) Type of carbon Acetic Propionic iso-Butyric n-Butyric iso-Valeric source Starch 1 40.7: 4.17 15.4: 1.21 0 11.5±2.44 0.18±0.37 Starch 2 37.9: 0.44 15.8: 0.11 0 9.66±0.37 0 Starch 3 35.4: 0.95 18.5: 0.62 0.48±0.95 8.28±0.51 0.35±0.40 Starch 4 34.8: 0.71 16.2: 0.36 0 10.7±0.34 0.53±0.46 Starch 5 37.0: 7.85 15.7: 4.65 0 10.4±3.19 0.46±0.40 Starch 6 35.8 17.4 0 9.77 1.05 Starch 7 34.1: 3.35 15.2: 0.36 0.79± 1.11 8.44±0.07 0.30±0.42 Starch 8 54.4: 1.65 19.0: 0.33 0 12.7±1.01 0.48±0.68 Starch 9 36.4: 0.90 17.7: 0.43 0 8.41±0.17 0.97±0.02 Starch 10 37.6: 0.82 15.5: 0.82 0 9.51±0.50 0 Starch 11 22.5: 0.26 10.0: 0.77 0 4.74±0.25 0 Glucose 31.0: 0.08 12.4: 1.09 3.05±0.30 7.15±0.02 0.41±0.57 Table 14. Efficiency of starch degradation by the microbiota that colonises animals fed either Waxy starch, Starch nos. 4, 6 or 9. Degradation of dietary starch Animals fed Starch 4 Starch 6 Starch 9 Amylose Starch: (Sigma) 1 + + + + + + 1 + - + - 4 + + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + + + + + + + 6 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 6 + + + + + + + + + + + 9 + + + + + + + + + + + Example 10 Specific pathogen free (SPF) mice were fed synthetic diets consistent with those presented in Table 6 but using waxy starch and starches 4, 6 and 9 (Table 4). Five animals per group were used and maintained in the diet for 2 weeks. Animals were sacrificed and the gastrointestinal tract was collected. Contents from the stomach, ileum, caecum and colon were collected, weighed and stored on ice for processing within an hour. The major bacterial groups were enumerated using routine selective media. The groups include the obligate anaerobes, lactobacilli, enterococci, coliforms, amylolytic bacteria, clostridia and bifidobacteria. Amylolytic activity was assessed for isolates from the mice on the various diets by ranking the zone of clearance around colonies on agar plates prepared using either amylose (Sigma) of starches 4, 6 or 9. Results are presented in Figures 4, 5, 6 and 7. It can be seen in these figures that the different starches will induce altered levels of specific groups of microbes at different sites in the tract. For example starch 6 and 4 stimulate lactobacillus from the stomach, ileum and caecum; starch 9 stimulates bifidobacterium in all sites samples; starch 4 stimulates endospore forming populations such as the clostridia in all sites sampled and suppresses the bifidobacterial numbers as all sites sampled; starch 9 suppressed endospore forming populations in all regions sampled. Example 11 Ex-germ free mice colonised with human faecal homogenates were fed a commercial animal diet. Material from gastrointestinal of germ free mice colonised with human microbes (gastric, ileal, caecal and colonic content) was diluted in Wilkins Charlgren broth (1/1000). The faecal microbial composition of the animal that served as a source for inoculum is presented in Table 15. Diluted material was used as the inoculum for the starch media (Table 1) continuing the different resistant starches in Table 4. The mice gastrointestinal content mixes were sampled at 0 and 9 h post inoculation. The use of different modifications of resistant starches or unmodified starches could be used to control specific populations at different sites. This has been shown when gut contents from the stomach, ileum, caecum or colon of ex-germ-free mice colonised with human colon microflora were collected and inoculated into media containing the various starches as in Table 4. The mixtures were incubated anaerobically at 37°C. The concentrations of the major bacteria groups were enumerated and these included the total anaerobes, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria. It was shown that the modification influenced the levels of the different microbes. For example, starch 9 induced higher levels of obligate anaerobes in the ileum than were induced by starch 8 (Figure 8) while starch 8 promoted higher levels of these obligate anaerobes in the caecum than were induced by starch 9 (Figure 9). Table 15. Microbial composition of faeces from mouse to be used Bacteria CFU per g Lactobacilli <10 3 Bifidobacteria 1.7xl0 5 Enterococci 3.7xl0 7 E. coli < IO 3 Total anaerobes 9.6xl0 9 Total amylolytic < 10 3 endospores 3.3xl0 3 The resident bifidobacterial and amylolytic population may be replaced with new bfidobacterial and amylolytic populations. This will happen if the unmodfified Hi-maize™ (Starch no. 6) is supplied. Although bifidobacterial and amylolytic populations will be disadvantaged in the short term, animals fed Starch 6 (fro about 2.5 months) have a dense bifidobacterial and amylolytic population through out the gastrointestinal tract (Figures 4, 5, 6 and 7 and Table 14). Uses It has been shown that carboxymethylated resistant starch consumption resulted in greater numbers of faecal Bacteroides than unmodified resistant starch. It is well established that Bacteroides spp contribute to saccharide degradation in the large intestine, in particular polysaccharides degradation (Salvers, 1979). This would result in an increase in short chain fatty acids, which are used as metabolic fuel for the epithelial mucosa and for the host. In addition, there is a clear link between the levels of butyrate and the iincidence of polyps and cancer (Young, 1996). Consequently, enhancing bacteroides numbers will lead to increased fermentation which will contribute to intestinal health and protect from the risks of colon cancer. Other chemically modified starches may lead to enhancement of other beneficial bacteria in the large intestine. Consequently, one can use a modified resistant starch in the diet to achieve one or all of the following conditions: i) as a general gut microflora stabiliser: ii) in clinical conditions related to disturbances e.g. flora related irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, diarrhoea; iii) improved intestinal health e.g. of the epithelial mucosa; iv) immunostimulating activities; and v) colon cancer In addition, as discussed by Coates (Coates, 1988), resistant starch ingestion can cause a lowering of the pH which will lead to suppression of bacterial transformation of cholesterol and bile acids, thus affecting excretion of cholesterol and bile acids. Since the present inventors have found that modification of the resistant starch affected utilisation by specific microbes and the bacterial groups that were enhanced, modifications of the resistant starch could influence cholesterol and bile acid excretion levels. It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown in the specific embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as broadly described. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.

Claims: CLAIMS: 1. An improved method of enhancing a population of one or more target microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract of an animal, the improvement comprising providing to the animal a selected modified or unmodified resistant starch or mixtures thereof, such that the one or more microorganisms will selectively utilise the starch and/or increase in number and/or activity in the gastrointestinal tract. 2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the resistant starch is selected from high amylose starches and modified forms thereof. 3. The method according to claim 2 wherein the high amylose starch includes maize starch having an amylose content of 50% w/w or more. 4. The method according to claim 3 wherein the maize starch having an amylose content of 80% w/w or more. 5. The method according to claim 2 wherein the high amylose starch inckides rice or wheat starch having an amylose content of 27% w/w or more. 6. The method according to claim 2 wherein the high amylose starch includes particular granular size ranges of starches having an amylose content of 50% or more with enhanced resistant starch content. 7. The method according to claim 2 wherein the high amylose starch from plants selected from the group consisting of maize, barley, wheat, rice, legumes, bananas, potatoes, and modified forms thereof. 8. The method according to any one of claims 2 to 7 wherein the resistant starch is modified chemically, enzymatically, and/or physically. 9. The method according to claim 8 wherein the chemical modification is by etherification, esterification, or acidification. 10. The method according to claim 8 wherein the physical modification is by crystallisation. 11. The method according to any one of claims 2 to 7 wherein the modified resistant starch is selected from the group consisting of hydroxypropylated starch, acetylated starch, octenyl succinated starch, carboxymethylated starch, and succinated starch.

Inventors: CONWAY PATRICIA LYNNE, HENRIKSSON KARL ANDERS OLOF, MCNAUGHT KENNETH JOHN, WANG XIN, CONWAY, PATRICIA, LYNNE, HENRIKSSON, KARL, ANDERS, OLOF, MCNAUGHT, KENNETH, JOHN, WANG, XIN
Applicants: ARNOTT S BISCUITS LTD, BROWN IAN LEWIS, BURNS PHILIP RES & DEV PTY, BURNS PHILP & COMPANY LIMITED, COMMW SCIENT IND RES ORG, CONWAY PATRICIA LYNNE, GIST BROCADES AUSTRALIA PTY LI, GOODMAN FIELDER INGREDIENTS LI, HENRIKSSON KARL ANDERS OLOF, MCNAUGHT KENNETH JOHN, UNIV NEW SOUTH WALES, WANG XIN, ARNOTT'S BISCUITS LIMITED, BROWN, IAN, LEWIS, BURNS PHILP RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT PTY. LTD., COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION, CONWAY, PATRICIA, LYNNE, GIST-BROCADES AUSTRALIA PTY. LIMITED, GOODMAN FIELDER INGREDIENTS LIMITED, HENRIKSSON, KARL, ANDERS, OLOF, MCNAUGHT, KENNETH, JOHN, THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES, WANG, XIN
Application year: 1997
Main classification: A61K31
IPC codes: A23L1, A61K31, A61K36, A61P1, C12N1