METHOD IN CALENDERING OF A PAPER WEB OR EQUIVALENT

Abstract: The invention concerns a method in calendering, in particular supercalendering, of a paper web or equivalent, in which method the paper web (W) or equivalent is passed through the calendering nips (N11, N12, N13, N14, N15; N21, N22, N23, N24, N25) formed by the rolls (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22) in view of calendering of the paper web (W), in which method the rolls (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16; 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22) are placed in at least two stacks (101; 102) of rolls. The paper web (W) is passed alternatingly from the corresponding calendering nip (N11, N12, N13, N14, N15) in each stack (101) of rolls into the calendering nip (N21, N22, N23, N24, N25) in the following stack (102) of rolls.

Description: Method in calendering of a paper web or equivalent The invention concerns a method in calendering, in particular supercalendering, of a paper web or equivalent, in which method the paper web or equivalent is passed through the calendering nips formed by rolls for calendering of the paper web, in which method the rolls are placed in at least two stacks of rolls, in which method the paper web is passed from a corresponding calendering nip in each stack of rolls into a corresponding calendering nip in the next stack of rolls. As is well known, the set of rolls in a supercalender comprises a number of rolls, which have been arranged one above the other as a stack of rolls. The rolls placed one above the other are in nip contact with each other, and the paper web to be calendered is arranged to pass through the nips between the rolls. Supercalenders involve the drawback that in supercalenders the nips are loaded by the force of the weight of the set of rolls, in which case the distribution of the linear load from the upper nip to the lower nip is increasing in a substantially linear way. This has the consequence that the linear load present in the lower nip determines the loading capacity of the calender. Thus, the calender is dimensioned in compliance with the performance of the lowest rolls and, at the same time, some of the loading or calendering potential of the upper nips remains unused. Earlier, attempts have been made to solve this drawback related to the prior art so that attempts have been made to increase the deficient loading of the upper nips so that the supercalender is placed in the horizontal plane or that the stack of rolls in the calender is divided into two stacks of rolls. Such an embodiment has, however, also proved expensive, because a calender of two parts requires a higher number of adjustable-crown rolls. One embodiment in which the set of rolls in the calender has been divided into two stacks of rolls is described in the DE Utility Model Application No. 295 04 034.3. In this prior-art solution, in the calender divided in two stacks of rolls, the paper web is first passed through the calendering nips in one stack of rolls, and after that the paper web is passed into the other stack of rolls, in which the paper web is passed through its calendering nips. In the way known from the prior art, in supercalenders, first one side, for example the top side, of the paper web has been calendered/glazed, and then the other side, for example the bottom side. In the prior-art solutions, a so-called reversing nip has determined where the side to be glazed is changed. In supercalenders, the glazing takes place most intensively in the first nips, in which case the glazing of the side that is glazed in the later nips to the same glaze level as is reached by the side glazed first requires, relatively speaking, higher linear loads, and this causes a higher loss of bulk in the web. Also, the difficult control of successive glazing often produces unequalsidedness in the paper glaze degree. The object of the present invention is to provide a solution in which the problems related to unequalsidedness of glazing have been eliminated or at least minimized. In view of achieving the objectives stated above and those that will come out later, the method in accordance with the invention is mainly characterized in that, in the method, the paper web is passed from one stack of rolls into the next stack through a corresponding calendering nip in each stack of rolls until the web is passed from the last stack of rolls back through the following corresponding calendering nips from one stack of rolls into the next stack in the reversed sequence, and this is repeated until the paper web is passed from the last calendering nip to further processing. According to the invention, the set of rolls in the supercalender has been divided into at least two stacks of rolls placed at a distance from one another, wherein the web runs from one stack of rolls into the next one until it is returned from the last stack of rolls through the other stacks of rolls into the first stack, etc. Thus, in the stacks of rolls in the calender, the web runs first through, for example, the first calendering nips in all the stacks of rolls and next through the second calendering nips in the reversed sequence until the web is passed from the last calendering nip to further processing, for example to reeling. This provides a number of advantages. In particular, the problems related to unequalsidedness of glazing are reduced remark¬ ably and, moreover, the control of unequalsidedness is easier. Further, the solution in accordance with the invention provides savings in the bulk of the web, because the intensively loaded lower nips at the side that is to be glazed last are omitted and the glazing of both sides is started at the same time. By means of the present invention, a better glaze and smoothness are also obtained for the paper, and, moreover, it is possible to use lower linear loads, in which case the rolls have a longer service life and it is also possible to use higher running speeds. The arrange- ment in accordance with the invention does, in itself, not require a higher number of rolls than in the prior-art solutions, because by means of the mode of running in accordance with the invention and by means of the arrangement of regulation of the tension the same quality level is achieved with a lower number of nips than in the prior-art solutions. According to the invention, the paper web can also be passed, in stead of being passed into the topmost calendering nip in a stack of rolls, for example, first into the lowest nip in the stack of rolls or even into the second nip from the top or from the bottom. The latter alternative is suitable for use, for example, when it is desirable, for example when the first treatment nip is at the top, to bring the bottom side of the web first into contact with a hot roll face and when, at the same time, it is desirable to use non-coated upper rolls only. In such a case, in the nip between the upper roll and the soft roll placed below it, no web runs at all. A similar situation can, of course, also arise when soft-coated upper/lower rolls only are used. Also, a supercalender construction consisting of at least two stacks of rolls is of lower height, in which case an equally large space in the vertical direction is not needed as in the prior-art supercalender solutions. Nor is a reversing nip needed in the invention in order to reverse the other side of the web for glazing, but the rolls in the stacks of rolls have been arranged so that both sides of the web are glazed substantially at the same time. According to the invention, for the control of the web tension between the stacks of rolls, for example, linear loads adjustable specifically for each nip are employed. The tensions and the differences in speed can also be controlled by choosing different roll hardnesses or roll materials or by using roll-specific drives. For the control of the web tensions between stacks of rolls, it is also possible to utilize the stretch, in which the lag arising from slipping produces a slower surface speed of the upper rolls. The stretch arising from compression of paper compensates for the lag arising from slipping, and with a certain paper with a set of rolls of a certain sort the lag and the stretch are highly stable, i.e. the same paper can also be run through two separate equal sets of rolls. For the control of web tensions, it is also possible to use nip-specific regulation of the linear load. For example, if a slack portion or an excessive tension tends to be formed in some gap between nips, the difference in draw over said gap can be changed by tightening or slackening the preceding or following nip. In the arrange¬ ment in accordance with the invention, it is also relatively easy to find a state of balance in which the tensions over all gaps are substantially equal, and in such a case the same glaze is obtained for both sides of the paper. The nip load, the roll hardness, and roll-specific drives, all of them affect the difference in speed between the rolls, in which connection all of these factors can be utilized for the control of the tensions between the stacks of rolls. If necessary, the web tension can be measured between the stacks of rolls, and based on the measurement results it is possible to regulate the difference in speed. Further, in the present invention, it is possible to take advantage of the fact that paper stretches when it becomes moist and shrinks when it becomes dry. In the present invention, this phenomenon is utilized in the control of the tension of the paper between the nips by regulating the moisture balance to such a level that the run of the web between the nips is controlled. In a summarizing way, it can be stated that, in an arrangement in accordance with the present invention, the runnability is achieved so that a predetermined web tension is maintained by regulating the nip pressures specifically for each nip, for example, by means of relief devices or by in the sets of rolls placing self-loading rolls also in intermediate positions, by regulating the torques applied to the rolls through their drives or by regulating the surface speeds of the rolls, by regulating the temperature and/or moisture of the web, by regulating the surface temperature and/or the inside temperature in the rolls, and by regulating the temperature, pressure and humidity in the atmosphere surrounding the web. The predetermined web tension is main- tained by choosing the properties of the roll coatings so that slipping between the rolls maintains the tensions of the web portions placed between the stacks of rolls. In the arrangement in accordance with the invention, the calendering result is regulated first by regulating the properties of the web: glaze, thickness and smooth- ness, which are regulated by using the regulation parameters mentioned above in relation to the regulation of tension. Thus, in the regulation of the stacks of calender rolls, consideration is given, at the same time, both to control parameters related to the regulation of the web tension and to control parameters related to the web properties aimed at. In the regulation of the regulation parameters, it is possible to use the following methods and devices. The web tension is regulated by means of empirical running parameters that have been stored in the memory specifically for each paper grade, or adaptively by means of devices of measurement of tension, of which devices can be mentioned tension measurement rolls, sets of rolls for tension measurement, measurement of tension by means of an air-cushion beam, measurement of tension as point measurement by means of an oscillating or static detector. Regulation of the roll and web speeds can be carried out based on measurement of surface speed, on measurement of speed of rotation of the rolls, or based on measurement of the flow in the roll drives. In the regulation of the roll temperatures, it is possible to use internal heat regulation methods, for example regulation of the heat transfer by a heating medium, for example regulation of the heat transfer by means of oil, water, steam, combustion gases, heating by means of an electric resistor, or inductive heating. In the regulation of the roll temperature, it is also possible to use external heat regulation methods, such as inductive heating, radiation heating and/or gas blowing. In regulation of the temperature / heating capacity of the rolls, adaptive regulation connected with measurement of the properties of the web, adaptive regulation connected with measurement of the roll surface temperature, adaptive regulation connected with measurement of the temperature of the roll heat regulation medium, or adaptive regulation connected with measurement of the heating capacity of a roll is used. The moisture and the temperature of the web can be regulated by adjusting the feed of steam onto the web, by regulating the feed of water mist onto the web, by means of drying/heating of the web produced by means of air blowing, by means of moistening taking place by means of a film transfer method, or by means of regulation of the atmosphere surrounding the web. Besides by the means mentioned above, the web temperature can also be regulated by means of heat regulation rolls and sets of belts, by means of sets of belts, by means of radiation heaters, and by means of regulation of the deflection angle of the web against the calender rolls. According to the invention, the stacks of rolls used in calenders can be provided with most different combinations of rolls. Possible combinations include, for example, stacks of rolls in which all the rolls are provided with soft coatings, in which all the rolls are provided with hard faces, for example metal-faced or ceramic- faced rolls or equivalent, or in which some of the rolls are soft rolls and some of them hard rolls. As a special case can be mentioned a stack of rolls in which every other roll is soft and every other roll hard. Further, in the stacks of rolls in a calender, all the rolls can be driven rolls, or only one roll is driven, as is known from conventional supercalenders. When the stacks of rolls are operated by means of one drive roll only, the location of the drive roll is chosen so that the slipping between said roll and the other stacks of rolls in the set of rolls maintains the tension of the web portions between the stacks of rolls and permits regulation of tension by means of other regulation parameters. In the following the invention will be described in more detail with reference to the figures in the accompanying drawing, in which Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of a prior-art calender which consists of two stacks of rolls, Figure 2 is a schematic illustration of an exemplifying embodiment of a calender in accordance with the present invention, Figure 3 is a schematic illustration of a second exemplifying embodiment of a calender in accordance with the present invention, Figure 4 is a schematic illustration of a third exemplifying embodiment of a calender in accordance with the present invention, Figures 5A...5C are schematic illustrations of some embodiments for passing the paper web through a calender consisting of two stacks of rolls, Figure 6 shows a control block diagram for a calender of the present invention. In the prior-art calender 10' shown in Fig. 1, the calender comprises two stacks 10 1 ', 10 2 ' of rolls, in which solution the paper web W is first passed through the calendering nips N' in the first stack 10 j ' of rolls and after that through the calen¬ dering nips N' in the second stack 10 ' of calendering rolls. The various rolls in the calender are denoted with the reference numerals l l',12',13',14',15\ 18\ 19',20\ 21 ',22' . The guide rolls of the web are denoted with the reference numerals 23', and the frame constructions of the calender are shown in the figure schematically, and they are denoted with the reference numeral 30'. In the embodiment of the invention shown in Fig. 2, the calender 10 comprises two stacks 10,,10 2 of rolls, and calender rolls 11 , 12,13, 14, 15, 16;17,18, 19,20,21,22 are fitted one above the other in each of said stacks. In the roll stack 10ι , 10 2 , hard rolls 11 ,13,15;18,20,22 and soft rolls 12,14,16;17,19,21 alternate, and the web W is passed to run alternatingly through the calendering nips Ni2 < Ni3,Nι ,N, 5 ;N 2 ι , N 22 ,N23,N24,N 25 in each stack 10, ;10 2 of rolls so that different sides W j ,W 2 of the web W are glazed alternatingly. As is shown in Fig. 2, the paper web W is passed through the nip N π between the hard roll 11 and the soft roll 12 in the first stack 10 j of rolls and through the nip N 2 i formed by the topmost soft roll 17 and the hard roll 18 in the second stack 10 2 of rolls onto the web guide roll 23, by whose means the web is reversed and passed through the second highest nip N 2 in the second stack 10 2 of rolls formed between the hard roll 18 and the soft roll 19 into the first stack 10ι of rolls, in which the web W is passed through the second highest nip N 12 between the soft roll 12 and the hard roll 13 onto the web guide roll 24. In this way the paper web W runs from one stack of rolls into the other through the nips Ni3,N 2 3,N24,N 14 ,N 15 ,N 25 so that both sides W j ,W 2 of the web W are glazed alternatingly. The frame constructions of the calender 10 are illustrated in the figure just as a schematic construction 30. The drive arrangement of the roll 11 is illustrated as a schematic illustration 31. The tension of the paper web W can be measured in the area between the stacks 10 j , 10 2 of rolls, for example, by means of a measurement device 32,33, from which the measurement result is passed to the control and drive system 34,35 of the calender, which system 34,35 controls the operation of the calender, on the basis of the measurement result, so that the web tension is at the desired level. Fig. 3 is a schematic illustration of an exemplifying embodiment of the invention in which steam boxes 40 have been fitted in connection with each stack 10 j ,10 2 of rolls for moistening of the paper web W. In the other respects the exemplifying embodi- ment shown in Fig. 3 is similar to that shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 4 shows an exemplifying embodiment of the invention in which the calender 10 is composed of three stacks 10 j , 10 2 and 10 3 of rolls. In the exemplifying embodi¬ ment shown in the figure the paper web W is first passed through the first calender¬ ing nip N j 1 ,N2 1 ,N 3 i at the top of each stack 10ι ,10 2 ,lθ3 of rolls, after which the paper web W is passed over the guide roll 23 through the second calendering nip N 32 ,N 22 ,Nι 2 in each stack of rolls in the reversed sequence, and so forth, until the paper web W is passed through the last calendering nip N 35 to further processing. In the other respects the calender 10 is similar to the exemplifying embodiments shown in Figs. 2 and 3, and corresponding parts are denoted with corresponding reference numerals. The calender rolls in the stack 10ι of rolls in the calender 10 are denoted with the reference numerals 11, 12,13, 14, 15, 16, the calender rolls in the second stack 10 2 of rolls in the calender 10 are denoted with the reference numerals 17,18,19,20,21 and 22, and the calender rolls in the third stack 10 3 of rolls are denoted with the reference numerals 41,42,43,44,45 and 46. The frame constructions of the calender are denoted with the reference numeral 30, and the measurement, regulation and/or drive system of the calender with the reference numerals 32,34. Figs. 5A...5C illustrate some applications for running the paper web W in a calender 10. The running direction of the paper web W is denoted with the arrow F, and the web W is passed alternatingly through the calendering nips in each stack lO j ,10 2 of rolls. In Fig. 5A the paper web W is passed into the second calendering nip, counted from the top, in the first stack 10 j of rolls, which is formed between the rolls 12 and 13. In Fig. 5B the paper web W is passed into the calender 10 first into the second calendering nip, counted from the bottom of the stack, in the first stack 10 j of rolls, which nip is formed between the rolls 14 and 15. In the exemplifying embodiment shown in Fig. 5C the paper web W is first passed into the lowest calendering nip in the first stack 10, of rolls, which nip is formed between the rolls 15 and 16. In the control diagram shown in Fig. 6, the control system consists of the following parts: paper tension measurement 51, paper moisture measurement 52, paper speed measurement 53, paper temperature measurement 54, paper thickness measurement 55, paper glaze measurement 56, roll speed measurement 57, roll surface tempera- ture measurement 58, roll internal temperature measurement 59, measurement of heating capacity of rolls 60, measurement of drive capacity of rolls 61 , measurement of drive torque of rolls 62, on the basis of which measurements the regulation values are determined by means of the paper-grade specific running parameters 63, and the regulation values are determined 64 by means of the mapped process, on whose basis the regulation 65 of the actuators that act upon the moisture of the paper, the regulation 67 of the drives, the regulation 67 of the properties of the atmosphere surrounding the paper, and the regulation 68 of the temperature of the rolls are obtained. For the control system, there can be a number of measurement points that is chosen freely based on the requirements and placed at suitable locations. Above, the invention has been described with reference to some preferred exemplify¬ ing embodiments of same only, and the invention is by no means supposed to be strictly confined to the details of said embodiments. Many variations and modifica¬ tions are possible within the scope of the inventive idea defined in the following patent claims.

Claims: Claims 1. A method in calendering, in particular supercalendering, of a paper web or equivalent, in which method the paper web (W) or equivalent is passed through the calendering nips (N 1 1 ,N 12 ,N 1 3,N 14 ,N 15 ;N 21 ,N 22 ,N 2 3,N 24 ,N 25 ;N 31 ,N3 2 ,N 3 3,N3 4 , N 35 ) formed by the rolls (11 , 12,13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21,22,41,42,43,44,45,46) for calendering of the paper web (W), in which method the rolls (11 ,12, 13, 14, 15, 16;17, 18, 19,20,21, 22;41, 42,43,44,45,46) are placed in at least two stacks (10, ; 10 2 ; 10 3 ) of rolls, in which method the paper web (W) is passed from a corresponding calendering nip (Ni in each stack (10,) of rolls into a correspon¬ ding calendering nip (N 21 ,N 22 ,N 2 3,N 24 ,N 25 ;N 3 , ,N 32 ,N33,N 3 ,N3 5 ) in the next stack (10 2 ;10 3 ) of rolls, characterized in that, in the method, the paper web (W) is passed from one stack (10, ;10 2 ) of rolls into the next stack (10 2 ; 10 3 ) through a correspon¬ ding calendering nip in each stack (10 j ;10 2 ;10 3 ) of rolls until the web is passed from the last stack (10 3 ;10 2 ) of rolls back through the following corresponding calender¬ ing nips from one stack (10 3 ;10 2 ) of rolls into the next stack (10 2 ; 10,) in the reversed sequence, and this is repeated until the paper web (W) is passed from the last calendering nip to further processing. 2. A method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that, in the method, the tension of the paper web (W) between the stacks (10 1 ; 10 2 ; 10 3 ) of rolls is regulated from a measurement device (32,33) based on a measurement result. 3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the tension of the paper web (W) between the stacks (10ι ;10 2 ;10 3 ) of rolls is regulated by regulating the linear load in each calendering nip ( j 1 ,N 12 ,N I 3,N|4,N, 5 ;N 21 ,N 22 ,N 2 3,N 24 , N 25; N 31 ' N 32' N 33' N 34> N 35)- 4. A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the tension of the paper web (W) between the stacks (10 j ; 10 2 ; 10 3 ) of rolls is regulated by choosing the roll hardnesses and/or roll materials so that the desired tension is achieved. 5. A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the tension of the paper web (W) between the stacks (10 1 ;10 2 ; 10 3 ) of rolls is regulated by means of roll-specific (11,12,13,14,15,16,17, 18,19,20,21 ,22,41 ,42,43,44,45,46) drives. 6. A method as claimed in any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the web tension of the paper web (W) is regulated by making use of the stretch and the compression of the paper web (W). 7. A method as claimed in any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the web tension of the paper web (W) is changed by tightening or slackening the preceding or following nip (Nj 1 ,N 12 ,N 1 3,N ]4 ,N I5 ;N 21 ,N 22 ,N 2 3,N 24 ,N 25 ;N 31 ,N32, ^33 > N 3 ,N 35 ) at the point at which the tension of the paper web (W) between stacks (10ι ; 10 2 ; 103) of rolls is changed. 8. A method as claimed in any of the preceding claims, characterized in that, in the method, the web tension of the paper web (W) is regulated by regulating the moisture balance of the paper web (W). 9. A method as claimed in any of the preceding claims, characterized in that each side (W, ,W 2 ) of the paper web (W) is calendered substantially simultaneously. 10. A method as claimed in any of the preceding claims, characterized in that, in the method, in the successive calendering nips (Ni ] ,Nι 2 ,N,3,Nι 4 ,Ni5;N 2 ι ,N 22 , N 23 ,N 2 ,N 2 5 ;N 31 ,N 32 ,N 33 ,N 3 ,N 5 ) following one after the other, a different side (Wι ,W 2 ) of the paper web (W) is calendered. 11. A method as claimed in any of the claims 1 to 10, characterized in that, in the method, the rolls in the calender (10) are placed in two stacks (10 j ; 10 2 ) of rolls, through whose calendering nips the paper web (W) is passed. 12. A method as claimed in claim 11, characterized in that, in the method, the calendering nips (N, ι ,N 12 ,N j 3,N j4 ,N j 5;N 2 j ,N 22 ,N 2 3,N 24 ,N 2 5) in each stack (10ι , 10 2 ) of rolls are formed so that, in a stack (10, ,10 2 ) of rolls, a hard calender roll and a soft calender roll alternate so that in each stack (10, , 10 2 ), one side of the paper is glazed alternatingly. 13. A method as claimed in claim 11 or 12, characterized in that, in the method, the paper web (W) is passed first into the first calendering nip (Ni ,) in the first stack (10 j ) of rolls, after which the web is passed into the first calendering nip (N 21 ) in the second stack (10 2 ) of rolls, that the web is further passed into the second calendering nip (N 22 ) in the second stack (10 2 ) of rolls, from which the web is passed into the second calendering nip (N 12 ) in the first stack (10,) of rolls and from it further into the third calendering nip (N, 3 ) in the first stack (10,) of rolls and in a corresponding way further until the paper web (W) is passed from the last nip (N I5 ) in the first stack (10 j ) of rolls into the last calendering nip (N 25 ) in the second stack (10 2 ) of rolls. 14. A method as claimed in any of the claims 1 to 10, characterized in that, in the method, the rolls in the calender (10) are placed in three stacks (10J ; 10 2 ; 10 3 ) of rolls, through whose calendering nips the paper web (W) is passed. 15. A method as claimed in claim 14, characterized in that, in the method, the paper web (W) is passed first into the first calendering nip (N, ,) in the first stack (10ι) stack of rolls, after which the web (W) is passed through the first calendering nip (N 21 ) in the second stack (10 2 ) of rolls into the first calendering nip (N 31 ) in the third stack (10 3 ) of rolls, that the web is further passed through the second calender- ing nip (N 32 ) in the third stack (10 3 ) of rolls into the second calendering nip (N 22 ) in the second stack (10 2 ) of rolls, from which the web is passed into the second calendering nip (N, 2 ) in the first stack (10,) of rolls and from it further into the third calendering nip (N, 3 ) in the first stack (10,) of rolls and in a corresponding way further until the paper web (W) is passed from the last nip (N 15 ) in the first stack (10 j ) of rolls through the last calendering nip (N 25 ) in the second stack (10 2 ) of rolls and from the last calendering nip (N 35 ) in the third stack (10 3 ) of rolls to further processing.

Inventors: KOSKINEN JUKKA, KYYTSOENEN MARKKU, NISSINEN VILHO, KOSKINEN, JUKKA, KYYTSOENEN, MARKKU, NISSINEN, VILHO
Applicants: KOSKINEN JUKKA, KYYTSOENEN MARKKU, NISSINEN VILHO, VALMET CORP, KOSKINEN, JUKKA, KYYTSOENEN, MARKKU, NISSINEN, VILHO, VALMET CORPORATION
Application year: 1997
Main classification: D21G1
IPC codes: D21G1