METHOD OF USING FINGERPRINTS TO AUTHENTICATE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS

Abstract: Disclosed are a system and a method employing a user's fingerprint to authenticate a wireless communication. The user's personal fingerprint is employed as the secret key in the context of a modified "challenge-response" scenario. The system includes a fingerprint capture module on a mobile personal wireless communication device (e.g., a wireless telephone) and a central authentication system coupled to a conventional mobile switching center. The central authentication system contains information that associates each mobile identification number ("MIN") with a particular user's fingerprint. When a wireless communication is to be initiated, the central authentication system engages in a challenge-response authentication with the mobile switching station or the wireless phone using the stored fingerprint associated with the MIN through the common air interface. The correct response from the mobile station will only be generated when the user's fingerprint entered through the fingerprint capture module attached to the mobile station matches the information sent from the central authentication system, and only calls placed from authorized users are connected.

Description: METHOD OK USING FINGERPRINTS TO A UTHENTICATE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS Cross Reference to Related Applications This application claims pnonty fiom ( 1 ) US Provisional Patent Application No 60/025,947 Tiled Scptcmbci 1 1 , 1996, entitled METHOD OF USING FINGERPRINTS TO ELIMINATE WIRELESS PHONE FRAUD AND TO ASCERTAIN A CALLER'S IDENTITY and naming Y Li, D R K Rao, and S Subbiah as invcntois, and (2) US Piovisional Patent Application No 60/025,949, lilcd Scptcmbci I I , 1996, entitled EMBEDDABLE MODULE FOR FINGERPRINT CAPTURE AND MATCHING, and naming R Rao, S Subbiah. Y Li, and D Chu as invcntois Both ol these applications arc incoipoiated cicin bv l clcicncc in their entireties and foi all purposes Background of the Invention The picscnt invention iclatcs to security measuics foi wuclcss telephones oi ccllulai mobile phones Moic particulai ly, the invention lelates to authentication methods employing biomctπc mfoimation (c g., fingerprints) to guarantee non-fraudulent use of wπelcss telephones or cellular mobile phones. As known in the state ol the ai t, wireless telephones or ccllulai mobile phones are identified by mobile identification numbcis (MINs) and electronic scnal numbers (ESNs) Current piotocols foi wuclcss communication, cithci placing or receiving a call, lequπc both the MIN and the ESN lo be bi oadcast thiough a standard common an lntcifacc (CAI) between the wireless telephone and a mobile switching center (MSC) loi authouzation and billing pui poses. However, such mfoimation can be easily intciccptcd and obtained via specialized scanning equipment that is icadily available MINs and ESNs captuicd this way can be illegally programmed into other cellulai phones for the purpose of placing calls that will be billed to the peison that the MLN and ESN has been legitimately assigned to This type of theft has become a common practice woi ld-widc, and millions of dollais aic lost to the wuclcss scivicc pioviders and law cnfoi cement agencies (US $650 million in 1995). Vanous methods have been pioposcd to solve this problem One method (described in U.S Pat. No 5,448,760) proposes the idea of icquesting a peisonal identification number (PIN) each lime a call is placed. The PIN can be safely tiansmitted through a diffci cut channel However, this inconveniences the user and many uscis even forget their PINs Another method (described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,420,908) proposes monitoring each custome s habit or calling pattern (also known as user profiles) and blocking any calls that do not fit the customer's pievious calling pattern. However, uch a method suffers from two problems: ( 1 ) the calling pattern of a customer is difficult to accurately pin point (any time the calling pattern changes a legitimate call might be blocked) and (2) it will not successfully block calls from phones that continually change the MIN- ESN pair that they employ. In another method (described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,420,908 issued to Hodges and Rubcn tcin and incorporated herein by reference), a "challenge icsponse" authentication scheme is proposed to solve fraudulent use in wirciess communication. The proposed method includes a central authentication system serving several MSCs which store all MINs with associated secret keys that aic used lo generate the "challenge icspon.se" authentication. Having one ccntial authentication system for several MSCs eliminates the need for cross-system access between different MSCs. I Iowcvci , for sccui iiy icasons — e.g. power failuic. computer hacker attacks, natural disasters — there should be at least one additional 1 emote sile that maintains a minor copy of the central authentication system. Ideally backup communication between central authentication system and its mπτor(s) allow both hot and cold backups to dynamically maintain identical copies al all tunes. All MSCs communicate with the central authentication platlorm thiough a standaid phone line. This method also tcquircs each wirciess phone to have a device which contains special information to generate a coirect response to a specific "challenge". Each time that a user uses a cellular phone, the MIN and ESN aic sent to the MSC just as in the standaid protocol used wuclcss communication today. Then the MSC sends ihc information through a secure public switched telephone nctwoi k (PSTN) line lo ihc central authentication platloi m The ccntial system llicn lakes the sccict key which is associated with the MIN and generates a challenge which is scnl to the cellular phone through a different wireless lorwaid channel. The cellular phone then uses its special internal module to generate a response to the challenge which is then sent back to the MSC by wireless means and then f orwarded to ihc central system via standaid PSTN lines. The central system then compares the cellular phone's icsponse to the pre-calculated icsponse value it expects. If the icsponse is correct the use is authorized. Such a system has certain advantages and should improve security in wireless communication. Although no specific type of secret key was disclosed in the '908 patent, the specified secret keys - including a string of special integers - suffer major drawbacks. First, computer systems arc always subject to intruders/hackers. For example, j ust recently there was the much cclebiated case of Tsutomu Shimomura the network security expert and his attacker Kevin Mitnick the outlaw computer hacker (In Takedown by John Markoff and T. Shimomuia, Hyperion Press: USA 1995). In the case of a break-in or even a suspicion of a break-in, all stored sccict keys are rendered useless and all the keys need to be updated. This necessarily means that all the users have to visit their service provider in person and update their secret key. Second, if only one or a few keys arc stolen at any given time, the system would not be able to detect the theft until the end of each billing cycic (if even then). Thud, the "challenge" is MIN-spccific, the thieves who capluie the MEN and ESN ihiough the an interlace can also capture ihc "challenge" and its "icsponse" and attempt to crack the sccict key. While some encryption methods like RSA can be made very secure now, the powci ful computers that can be expected to become widely available in the futuie may allow sccict keys to be ciackcd with the knowledge of multiple challenges and their lcsponscs. Still fu lhci , with ihc global computer connectivity, Internet viruses have become a major issue and almost every week iherc is a new vn us that is iclcased, particularly fiom less developed countries. If Ihc central authentication system gels lnleclcd and ihc files tampered with, as bcfoic, all uscis have lo ictuin lo Ihcir service providci lo have a new secret key icissued All these loui sccnai ios aic quite likely lo happen in oui age of high-lcch ci iminals and even-higher tech teenage pranksters. What is needed thcicloic, is an improved sccuπly system lo protect against unauthorized use ol wuclcss communications. The method and associated system should provide improved sccuiiiy and be easy to maintain. Summary of (lie Invention The cuiicnt invention expands on the pnnciplcs and piotocols discussed above The iclcvant extension involves using a token generated from biomctπc information, ihc user's personal fingcrpiint in particular, as ihe secret key in the context of a modified "challenge-response" scenario. As will be explained, this virtually eliminates all of the drawbacks discussed above. Most generally, the invention involves the use of fingerprint matching to authenticate a call or other communication over a wneless communication network. The matching may be employed at a central location on the network, al the personal wireless device, or both. One aspect of ihc invention provides methods of authenticating calls to be made over a communication system. Typically, both a wireless source (e.g., a mobile telephone) and a central authentication node that may service numerous nodes participate in the methods ~ although each operates according to its own protocol. An authentication method implemented on the central authentication node may be characterized by the following sequence: (a) determining that the call has been initiated from a source; (b) delci mining whether source fingerprint data provided from the source matches stored fingcrpi int data associated with the source; and (c) if the source fingerprint data matches the stored fingerprint data, allowing the call to be completed. Matching may involve scpaialc matching slcps al both the source and the ccntial authentication node. Ii may also involve dcciypling a challenge. In addition lo ihc above basic steps, ihc authentication node may request that the source fingcrpi int data be provided fiom the source of the call. In the case of a mobile telephone system, the call initialed from the source may be forwarded through any of a plurality of mobile switching centers to reach ihc central authentication node. That is, the ccntial authentication node may serve multiple switching centers. In a pi cf erred embodiment, the central authentication node accesses the stored fingeipi iut data fiom a database that associates particular uscis' accounts with then fingerprints. The i ingcrpπnl data (Irom the source or stored database) may be embedded in a token having a format making il difficult to extract the fingcrpi int data. In one embodiment, that token foπnat may be an inter-minutiae distancc-vcctor-dcπvcd format such as one of the formats commonly employed in the ait. In one specific embodiment, Ihc method also involves (a) encrypting a challenge with the stoicd fingeipi inl data to produce an encrypted challenge; and (b) providing the encrypted challenge lo the source for the purpose of decrypting by the source with ihc source fingerprint data. The step of determining whether the source and stored fingerprint data match preferably involves (i) receiving a decrypted challenge from the source, which decrypted challenge had been decrypted with the source fingerprint data: and (ii) comparing the challenge with the decrypted challenge from the source If the two match, then it is assumed that the stored and source f ingerprints also match and Ihc call is allowed to proceed. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the method involves a further security feature to avoid use of a stolen fingerprint token. This technique operates on ihe assumption that each tune an individual gives a fingerprint, the print is slightly different due to the flexibility of the finger skin, ihc angle at which the finger is pressed down, etc. Thus, it is exceedingly rare that any two finger imprints from a given user will be identical. Recognizing this, the method may require the following: (a) determining whether the source fingerprint data is identical to one or more instances of sample fingerprint data previously received; and (b) if ihc source and any one of the instances of the sample fingerprint data arc identical, preventing the call from being completed. Authentication methods implemented on a source such as a wireless telephone (as opposed to the central authentication center as described above) may be characterized as including the following steps: (a) transmitting a dialed number to a switching center on the communication network; (b) receiving a user's fingerprint (possibly after a prompt); (c) generating source lingcrpi int data from the user's fingerprint; and (d) if the source fingerprint data matches stored fingerprint data associated with user, completing the call. The source may itscll determine whether ihc source fingerprint data matches the tored fingerprint data prior lo completing the call In the case of a wireless telephone, the method may also mciudc traditional calling steps such as liansmitting at least one of an MIN and an ESN lo the switching ccntci In conjunction with the encryption technique described above for the central authentication node, the souicc may pcrfoim the following steps: (I) receiving an cnciyptcd challenge from ihc switching ccntei . (n) decrypting the encrypted challenge with the source fi gcipi int data lo pi oducc a decrypted challenge; and (in) liansmitting ihc deciypicd challenge lo the switching ccntci , such that if ihc dccryplcd challenge is found to match an unencrypted challenge, specifying thai ihc source fingcipi inl data matches the stored fingerprint data (allowing the call lo piocccd). A pci onal wireless communication device (e.g., a wireless telephone) suitable loi use with the authentication methods ol this invention may be charactci izcd as including ihc following features: (a) a wuclcss communications interface f or sending and receiving wireless communications, (b) a device for captuπng the user's fingerprint; and (c) a processing device (e.g., a CPU) capable of converting the user's fingcrpiint lo source fingerprint data which can be tiansmillcd. Preferably, the wirciess device includes a casing and piovidcd within that casing are both the device foi captui mg the usci 's l ingcrpi int and ihc processing device. The wireless communications interface should be capable of sending the souice fingerprint data to a remote location. Preferably, it should be capable ol sending and receiving fingerprint data over a data channel which operates at a different frequency from a communications channel which sends and receives the wireless communications. In one embodiment, the device for capturing the user's fingerprint includes: (I) a fingerprint capture surface on which the user can place his or her finger to produce an optical image of his or her fingerprint; (u) an imager capable of generating an electronic image of the user's fingcipπnt (e.g., a CCD array or CMOS photodiodc/photogatc array) , and (iii) optics for directing the optical image of the user's fingerprint from the finger punt capture suifacc to the imager In a preferred embodiment, the imagcr is a CMOS photodiodc/photogatc array which is provided on an integrated circuit together with the processing device. In an alternative embodiment, the device for capturing the user's Fingerprint includes an imager which does not require optics. Examples of such "optics- free" imagcrs include capacitor arrays or ultrasonic mechanisms formed on semiconductor substrates. The processing device should contain the logic and resources necessary for comparing ihc source fingcipi inl data with slo cd fingerprint data received from a remote location. Preferably, Ihc processing device should also be capable of decrypting a challenge received from the remote location. As noted, the biomctric "challenge-response" authentication scheme of this invention preferably employs a central authentication platform serving sevciai or al! MSCs and wireless phones. In this manner, the current invention seeks to prevent fraudulently placed wireless calls using stolen MIN-ESN information. Another aspect of the invention provides a central authentication system or node connected lo a communications network and capable of rendering wirciess communications secure by processing biomctric information from a user. Such central authentication systems may be characterized as including (a) a communications interface for sending and receiving data communications over the communications network; (b) a database interface for accessing a database containing stored fingciprint data associated with users of wireless communications devices; and (c) a processor capable of determining whether a wireless communication from a wireless communications device should be permitted based upon a match between a fingerprint taken from the wireless communications device and stored fingciprint data associated the wireless communications device. Often the communications interface will be coupled to a public switched lclcphonc network such that the data communications arc directed to one or more mobile switching centers on the network. The database - which may form part of the central authentication system -- preferably includes, for at least some of the wireless communications devices, a plurality of received tokens containing information from fingerprints taken at the wireless communications devices. The system then compares newly received tokens from a given wireless communication device with ihc plurality of tokens for that wireless communications device. These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be further described below with reference lo Ihc associated drawings. Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 is a block diagram of various components of the present invention as it may be employed in a ccllulai phone system. Figure 2 is a representation of a MIN-challcngc key database table used to stoic tokens fiom biomcti ic information in accoidancc with one preferred embodiment of this invention. Figures 3 A and 3B together present a piocess flow diagram depicting a sequence of events in a challenge-response authentication method of the present invention. Figure 4 is a block diagram depicting basic components of a fingerprint capiuπng unit and an associated wireless telephone in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Figure 5 is a flow diagram depicting a fingerprint matching technique that may be employed with the present invention. Figure 6 is a block diagram of a central authentication system for processing biomctric information f rom a mobile telephone in accoidancc with one embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments The present invention is described herein in terms of a wireless telephone system The invention is not so limited For all purposes of this current invention, the term "wireless telephone" (or "wireless communication system") gcneπcally will be undci tood to include cclluiar phones, personal communication systems, telephones, personal digital assistants, wireless personal computers, wireless notebooks, etc. using analogue oi digital electronics technology. While the present invention is currently envisioned as providing substantial benefit to wireless communications, there is in principle no reason why it could not be applied to communications generally. Any communication that could benefit from authentication may be implemented with the present invention. Such communications include those made over a wire-based telephone system and employing an account code. The communications allowed over the communication system will sometimes be referred to herein as "calls." Examples of communications (calls) within the context ol llns invention include (a) analog transmissions such as telephone calls transmitting analog voice data over a wire medium or a wireless medium and (b) digital transmissions such as packctizcd messages over a network (LAN, WAN. Internet, etc.) and digilal voice dala over a wireless medium. Communications involving packclizcd transmissions may be conncclion-bascd transmissions such as TCP or connectionless transmissions such as UDP. Fingerprint technology including hardware image capture, software image processing, sol twa c/hai ware for fingerprint data storage and software f or fingciprint analysis/comparison is a relatively mature technology with over 20 years of development (see, for example, U.S. Pal. Nos. 2 952 18 1 , 4 151 512, 4 322 163, 4 537 484, 4 747 147, 5 467 403, each of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes). It is well-known that no Iwo individuals possess the same identical fingerprint and that accurate matching techniques in conjunction with well-captured images can positively identify an individual. The term "fingciprint" as used herein refers to handprints, palmpπnls. and other unique skin patterns in addition lo liaditional fingerprints. The present invention may employ sophisticated hardware and soil ware to allow rapid fingerprint based identification as described in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/025,949, filed on September 1 ! , 1996. naming R. Rao, S. Subbiah, Y. Li &. D Chu as inventors, and previously incorporated by reference. That application dcsci ibc an extremely small, low-cost fingerprint capture hardware module that lends itself to ready insertion inio many devices. The referenced Provisional Application was incorporated herein by reference for all purposes and is illustrative of the maturity of the fingerprint capture and comparison technology. FIG. 1 shows an apparatus that may be used to process a wireless call in accordance with the punciplcs ol the current invention. Λ fingciprint capturing device ("FCPD") 101 (such as that described in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/025,949, previously incorporated by reference) with an on-boa d CPU foi processing and comparison of Ihc captured fingciprint image (sec FIG. 4) is connected to the wireless telephone 102. This connection may be by any method, i.e. via a telephone modem or a data port specifically built-in lo ihc wireless telephone 102, an acoustic coupler, or the direct incorporation of the fingerprint module 101 into the wireless telephone 102. Preferably, the module 101 can be incorporated within telephone 102 such that a standard mobile telephone casing may house all electronics for operation of the telephone and fingerprint processing. In an especially preferred embodiment, the electronics for processing both the fingerprints and ihc telephone calls arc provided on a single integrated circuit chip. This makes it especially difficult to tamper with the system by, for example, intercepting signals between fingciprint capturing module 101 and telephone 102. In one embodiment of Ihc invention which employs a protocol similar to that of conventional wireless systems, each phone is provided with a MIN and ESN. When the user dials a telephone number using a keypad 1 12 on the wireless telephone 102, the MIN, ESN, and ihc number of the party being called is transmitted to a Mobile Switching Center (MSC) 103 ol " a wireless carrier 104. In response, MSC 103 performs the standaid verification ol the MIN and ESN as well-known in the art (sec oi example, in Wireless Communications, by T. S. Rappapon, 1 96, Picnticc-Hall which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes). If the MIN and ESN belong to a special group of users who have previously requested the additional layer of fingerprint based security with their service, Ihe MIN and ESN are sent to a Central Authcnticalion System (CAS) 106 via a public switched telephone network (PSTN) or Internet 105 lo avoid direct access of CAS 106 through the air interface This provides additional security for the CAS. In response lo ihc MIN being forwarded by MSC 103, CΛS 106 looks up its built- in MIN-Challcngc Key Database ( MCKD) 107 and retrieves an appropriate Challenge Key (CK 202, FIG. 2) that is associated with that particular MIN. The CK 202 is a token that has been derived from the user ' s fingerprint when ihc user f irst registered the pin chase ol his/her phone service The CK 202 is then used to encrypt a "challenge" thai is generated by the CAS 106. The challenge that is formulated by the CAS 106 is different each time when it is accessed by the same or different users. The CK 202 and ihc encrypted challenge arc then jointly sent to wireless telephone 102 through any available forward voice channel (FVC) or forward control channel (FCC) for example After reception ol the challenge f rom CAS 106 by wireless telephone 102, the challenge is for aidcd to FCPD 101 as detailed in FIG. 4 The user's f ingerprint information could have been requested by FCPD 101 cither bef ore this point and af ter ihc user entered ihc number of the called party, or at this time point itself. A lokcn. w hich in one embodiment could simply be an encoded collection of a set of unique minutiae/features found in the fingerprint, is then generated based on the f ingerprint information captured locally by FCPD 101. As well-known in the art of fingerprint matching, a fingerprint from any individual is unique to thai individual and therefore ihc variety of slightly different tokens (tokens can differ by a feature or two without any loss in uniqueness) that can be generated can only come from that individual. This is then compared with fingcrprmt- bascd lokcn CK 202 lhat was received from CAS 106. If there is a match of the tokens, the encrypted message is decrypted by using token CK 202 received from CAS 106. In other embodiments, cil cr or both tokens cculd be used to decrypt the challenge. A response (the decrypted challenge) is then sent back lo MSC 103 through any ol ihe available reverse voice channels (RVCs) or reverse control channels (RCCs). This is then foiwaidcd via PSTN oi Internet 105 (for additional ecurity one may limit use ol the common air interface as much as possible) back to CAS 106. The response iioni FCPD 101 to CAS 106 contains both the decrypted message and a token that is gcnciatcd from the fingerprint image ihc user supplied. If ( I ) the received dcciyptcd message matches the cxpcclcd response (i.e., the original unencrypted challenge that had been temporal lly stored in CAS 106, as detailed in FIG. 6) and (2) Ihc token received fiom the FCPD 101 matches the CK 202 in the MCKD 107, the call is authoi izcd and connected. This double matching method will reduce false positives. It will also prevent any illegal attempt thai relics only on a decryption of just the encoded challenge. It is important lo note that tokens generated fiom the same finger vaiy every time the fingerprint is captured. In a piclcrrcd embodiment, if Ihc lokcn sent fiom FCPD 101 (via wireless telephone 102) is idenlical lo that in the database (CK 202) the call will not be juthoi izcd. since it is extremely unlikely that the exact same token will be generated in subsequent image capture of the same finger. Presumably, such exact token matching will only happen if the token had been illegally captured and is being used foi illegal access into the phone nctwoi k. In this embodiment, the database may store up to a prc-spccificd numbci of tokens sent by usci li om wireless telephone 102. If the most cuircnt lokcn sent fiom the user is identical lo any lokcn from this list, the call is also blocked, since this may indicate the interception of a particular token sent from user to CAS 106 and used illegally This is a majoi advantage of ihc current invention since the token CK 202 used foi encryption (in othci words the secret key that is ccntial to all 'challenge-response' authentication methods ) can itself be bioadcast over the common an interface oi even made public. Thus the secret aspect ol system described in the above-referenced Hodges and Rubcnstcin patent may be avoided in one embodiment To reiterate, by blocking exact matches between a newly gcnciatcd token and a stored lokcn (one embodiment of ihis invention), the illegal capture of the token CK 202 does ol enable third-parlies to fraudulently initiate calls. This is a clear and substantial advantage over the prior ai l, and derives from ihc fact that pcisonal biomctric information is being used lo generate sccict keys. A further advantage is the token's resistance to coiruptioπ due to wireless noise. In one embodiment, a loss of a few features of the minutiae set fiom the token will sliil leave sufficient uncorruptcd features lo allow unique matching against anolhci token dciivcd from Ihc same fingci . One could therefore expect a "fuzzy" (non-dcierminislic) set of minutiae, that will give unique matching. Another advantage of the current invention, derives from the fact that the CK 202 tokens can be made public with no ill effects. Thus if the database MCKD 107 is stolen oi attacked by computer hackers and viruses, as long as a backup copy of ihc database MCKD 107 exists at a remote and secure mirror-site, there is no lasting negative consequence (so long as exact matches with prior stored tokens require that a call be blocked). FIG. 2 shows a typical sliuctuic for ihe MIN-Challcngc Key Database 107 ("MCKD") in accoidancc with one embodiment of this invention. A CK 202 is stored m association with each MIN 201. Additional instructions or restrictions on the use ol each MIN 201 can be stored in a special insiiuction section (SIS) 203. These may include, foi example, blocks on long distance calls to certain localities, restrictions on calls over a certain dollar amount, clc In addition, MCKD 107 includes a column 204 for storing recently received tokens fi om FCPD 101 Anytime that a received token exactly matches one ot the tokens stored in column 204, ihc call may be blocked. The CK 202 is a lokcn that is gcnciatcd liom ihc l ingeipi inl that the usei initiall provided when icgistci ing with the phone company This token contains inloi mation pertinent to the lingeipi inl minutiae mfoimation that has been embedded so as lo ensure that if stolen it would not lead to a loss of the original fingciprint itseif Since fingcipi inl images vaiy slightly fiom print lo punt, such tokens liom the same finger at repeated times will be different Also, depending upon the format of fingcrpi int minutiae in the tokens, two scpaiatcly generated tokens of the same punt w ill not fiom ihc outside appeal similar - only when fingerprint matching aigoiilhms foi compai ison are applied to both tokens gcnciatcd fiom different impressions ol the same fingci can both tokens be deemed lo be liom the same f ingci pi inl Thus simple possession ol a token f iom a given f ingcipi inl will not enable anyone to gencialc othci different tokens corresponding to diflcicnt fingcipi inl impression liom the same fingci . This lcndcis ihc method vciy robust and tamper piool Token matching fust requires cxtiaction of the fingcipiinl minutiae fiom the lokcn. These are then compared by matching their two-dimensional coordinates. If the coordinates match to within a defined tolerance, the tokens are deemed a match As explained below, tokens may be provided wilh a timestamp as an extra sccui ily measure. As known in the state of the ait, many fingerprint matching schemes involve ihe generation of lntcr-minutiac-bascd keys (i.e., distance vectors, etc.) that while being gcncially similar, will vary between multiple impressions of the same finger Various inlcr-minutiac distance-vectoi -derived formats are known in the art. Many of these (as wcli as variations on them) may be suitable for generating keys in accordance with this invention. Such keys may, of course, also serve as tokens such as CK 202 in this invention. Suitable matching schemes I f arc described in, lor example, US Patent No. 4,747, 147 issued to Spairow on May 24, 1988, US Patc l No. 5,493,62 1 issued to Matsumura on February 20, 1996, and information provided at the Woild Wide Web site www Lucent. Com/Pιcss/0597/mιnu l .GAF. Each ot these documents is mcoi poiaicd herein by reference foi all purposes A typical description of a processed fingerprint is a list of x, y and angle tabulation of each minutia Minor modification to these linear values (c g., adding slight landom displacements) will itill reflect the same underlying fingci piinl, allowing lot variation during multiple impressions (e.g., slight distortions and i oiling during the pressing of the lingci). Thus, using sli aightfoiward minutiae tabulations as tokens is susceptible lo minor modification that couid result in illegal phone access. A different and frequently used dcsci iption of fingciprint mfoimation is the lntcr- mmutiac distance vector mfoimation. Such descriptions are inherently non-hncar in nature and so when tabulations ol these are l andomly oi systematically modified 0 c without explicit knowledge ol ihc inherent non-lineaiity) in minor and iincai ways, the new odilicd tabulation will not, in general, reflect ihc undei lying original fingci print, even when allowing lor variation between multiple impressions of the same fingerprint Thus, use of such inter-minutiae dislance-vcctor-dciived keys (tokens) for matching purposes will foil wireless f i aud tcrs who may somehow illegally capture the tiansmitted and encrypted fingciprint information and tiy to use the exact same keys to fraudulently activate phone calls That is, in general legal phone use, one expects the tiansmitted fingerprint keys to be somewhat diffcrenl each time, and different in a way that makes sense with respect to ihc fingerprint. In illegal use, where the encrypted keys are captured, decrypted and ic-liansmiltcd. Ihc repeated use ol a set of exact same identical keys can be readily detected. Any minoi modification of the keys, without specific pnoi knowledge ol non-hncai relationships m oidci to be Iruc has to be compatible with the line fingciprint and thus leading to the detection ol such liaudulcnt use. The advantages ol using a central authentication plalfoim and a "challenge- response" authentication method are described in U.S. Patent No. 5,420,908 described above. However, the "challenge-response" authentication suggested in that patent differs significantly from the current invention in at least two ways First, the patent suggests a shared secret key (S-kcy) between the wireless phone and the central authcnticalion system. This necessarily requires a specialized memory chip that can stoic ihc S-kcy to be part ol the wireless phone itself. Thcicloic, in the event that the wireless phone is lost oi stolen, illegal calls can be made fi om the phone unless special instiuclions to block uch newly illegal calls have been sent lo ihc ccntial authentication system. The current invention, in contrast, relics on mfoimation that is stored at the user's fingertips itself, and therefore docs not require the wireless phone unit itself lo store any secret kcy/mformation. Consequently, a stolen or lost phone cannot be used illegally. Second, the challenge- response method described in the '908 patent docs not transmit ihc S-kcy itself over the air interface. The present invention may allow tiansmission of the "secret" key through the an interface; because the present challenge-response authentication scheme is not dependent on the "secret" key per sc. In a preferred embodiment, however, the key (CK 202) is kepi secret by some acceptable technique such as sending the challenge and response ovei variable channels unrelated to the voice transmission and/or providing additional encryption of the keys themselves. By using personal biomcli ic mfoi mation, like fingerprints, the present invention may oveicomc the majoi diawbacks of the generic "challenge-response" authentication schemes as typified by the ς 908 patent method FIGS. 3A and 3B present a flow chart of one typical sequence of events in a "challenge-response" authentication of this invention. The user begins ihc pi occss al a step 300 by dialing a telephone number using the keypad 1 12 of the wireless telephone 102. The MIN, ESN. and the phone numbci of the party being called are transmitted lo MSC 103 at a step 301 . At a branch point 302, as in a conventional system, MSC 103 eilhci conf irms the legitimacy ol the MIN-ESN pair and goes to a next step 303, oi blocks the call at a step 315. Λl a branch point 303, Ihc MSC determines if the user of the MIN requested additional security II ihc result is NO, the call is connected just as loutinely done m a conventional system at a step 316. If the icsuit is YES, ihc MIN is sent to the CAS 106 at a step 304. In a slcp 305, CAS 106 accesses MCKD 107 and requests token CK 202 that is associated with the MIN CAS 106 then gcneiatcs a challenge thai is different each time This is then encrypted with the token 202 in a step 306. The CAS 106 sends lokcn CK 202 and the encrypted challenge lo the wireless telephone via a slcp 307 using PSTN oi Internet 105. Additional layers of security can be added to the encrypted challenge and CK 202 if so desired. For example, the encrypted challenge can be sent to the mobile wireless phone over a different wireless forward channel. In a step 308, the user gives his/her fingciprint to the FCPD 101 and this is used to generate token. In certain variations, slcp 308 can be performed at any point alter step 301 and the generated token stored in a memory 404 (FIG. 4). Aftei the encrypted challenge has been sent to phone 102 and a lokcn has been generated fiom the user's fingciprint, FCPD 101 compares the generated token with the token it received from the CAS 106 at a conditional branch point 309. If they do not match, the call is blocked at a step 315. In one embodiment, whenever a call is blocked the token sent by FCPD 101 of the caller's fingciprint can be forwarded via MSC 103 through CAS 106 and specially stored for later criminal invcstigalion of fraudulent phone use (step 318). If they match, the token received from CAS 106, or in other embodiments both tokens (including the one generated at the phone), is used to decrypt the challenge sent from CAS 106 in a step 310 (begin FIG. 3B). The FCPD 101 then sends both the now-decrypted challenge and the locally generated token (from the user's fingci print captured on FCPD 101 ) back lo CAS 106 by way of MSC 103 via a slcp 3 1 I . Generally, the invention's direct mapping of individuals personally to the phone calls they make also allows the mapping of callers who attempt unsuccessful break- ins into the wireless phone system. Permanent records of the tokens generated from the fingerprints of callers attempting illegal entry can be kept, if desired, for further criminal investigation. More importantly, the mere idea of ihc potential of being caught when illegally using someone else's phone may greatly reduce phone fraud. After receiving the decrypted challenge from FCPD 101 , CAS 106 compares it with the challenge stored in a CAS icmporary memory 607 (FIG. 6) at a condilionai branch point 3 1 2. If the match is not successful the result from step 3 12 is NO and the call is blocked at a step 3 15 and then step 3 18 may be permitted if so desired. If there is a match the result is YES and ihc process moves on lo a conditional step 3 1 3. At this slcp, CAS 106 compares the token generated from the user's fingciprint captured and sent by FCPD 101 to one or more stored in its database 107 at column 202. If these tokens do not atch, ihc call is blocked, again al step 315 and step 3 18 is optionally performed. This second matching of the tokens (note that they were initially compared at step 309) is provided for additional security and may be dispensed with if desired. Ncxl, at an optional decision slcp 320, CAS 106 compares the token received from FCPD 101 with one or more stored tokens which were previously received from FCPD 101 and CK 202. These previously received tokens are preferably those stored in column 204 of database table 107. If it is found that the most recently received token exactly matches one of the tokens stored in columns 202 and 204 of database 1 07, the call is blocked at step 3 15 (and step 3 18 is optionally performed). As noted above, tokens arc generally not identical if they capture a fingciprint with sufficient resolution because each fingciprint from a given individual will vary slightly (e.g., ihe minutiae may be slightly offset from one another). To ensure authentication in ihc case where a given individual actually docs give two identical legitimate tokens, ihc system may only block the call if two or more successive tokens exactly match one or more of the stored tokens. If the tokens match at step 3 13 but not identically (optional step 320), the call is authenticated for connection al a step 314. Thereafter, at a step 3 16, Ihc process returns to ihe routine present-day calling piotocol lo complete the connection. If needed, allowance for failed authentication due to severe token corruption from wireless noise etc., can be made by having the piolocoi automatically re-try ihc entire procedure at step 304 The entire process exits at a slcp 317 and ends the illusti atcd flow-diagram. In a further piclei icd embodiment, the loi mat of the embedded fingerprint minutiae contains a limcstamp specifying the tune al which the usci 's fingerprint was lakcn The CAS would then deny access if ihc timcstamp was not from an appropriate window in lime (chosen to allow f oi a reasonable delay between transmission of the challenge and receipt of the newly gcnciatcd fingciprint lokcn) If a person should intercept the usci 's fingcipi inl token, not only would he/she have lo cxtiact the fingcrpi int minutiae, but he/she would also have lo piopci iy updalc the limcstamp in ordci defeat the system. In some embodiments, the CAS only checks for timcstamp, lather than examining ihc newly received token foi an exact match lo some multiple previously received tokens FIG. 4 is a diagiam presenting one embodiment of the FCPD 101 and its liitciconncclion with the wireless telephone 102 (FIG I ). The illustrated FCPD 101 contains a fingerprint imagci 4 17 for converting a fingcrpi int fiom a fingci 415 into an a fingci print image FCPD 101 also includes a CPU (central processing unit) 401 that can supply all the computational needs of the "challenge-response" authcnticalion process, and more importantly all ncccssaiy processing of Fingerprint images and their subsequent comparison. An lntci acc port 402 and a data bus line 403 are together capable of handling all the communications between 'vai ious parts of FCPD 101 and wireless telephone 102. This includes all lypcs of scnal intci faces and voice channels for transmuting and receiving data. A mcmoiy module 404 stoics at least those items ncccssai y to the operation ol FCPD 101 including. 1 ) a software pi ogi m 405 which contains piogram codes for fingci print image processing, matching, decryption of the challenge, and ihc gcncialion oi responses, and 2) a response sloiagc unit 406 which tcmpoi anly stoics the response before sending it to the CAS 106. CPU 401 can be any suitable integrated circuit or electronic design including mullichip modules and ciicuitiy formed on printed circuit boards. If it is an lntcgiatcd circuit, it may a general puipose microprocessor, a logic device such as an application specific integrated ciicuit (ASIC), etc. Examples of suitable ASICs include gate arrays, simple and complex programmable logic devices (PLDs), digital signal processors (DSPs), and field programmable gale an ays (FPGAs). In one embodiment, lingcrpπnt imager 4 ! 7 includes a fingciprint capture surface such as a window or capacilor airay which produces an image of the user's fingerprint when the user places his oi her finger thereon. In addition, imagcr 417 includes the optics necessary direct an optical image ol ihc lingcrpi int onto a solid state imagcr which also forms part of fingcipi mt images . The solid slate imagcr, which is prcieiably a CCD array or a CMOS photodiodc/photogaie ai ray, generates an electronic image of the usei 's fingerprint. II the solid stale imagcr is a CMOS pholodiodc/phologalc an ay, il may be provided on single inlcgiatcd ciicuit together with processing logic such as CPU 401. Further details ol suitable optical f ingci pi inl imagcis are piovidcd in U.S Piovi.sion.il Application No 60/025,949, "Embcddablc Module for Fingerprint Capture and Matching," filed on Scptcmbci 1 1 , 1996, and naming R. Rao, S. Subbiah, Y Li & D Chu as invcntois. In an alternativ e embodiment, imager 417 may be a capacitoi airay foi med on a semiconductoi substiale such as that desci ibed in the May 22, 1997 edition of the San Fiancisco Chronicle, "New Chip Vei ilics Fingcrpi ints" which pertains to a pioduct of Vcndicom Coi poi ation In anothci altci native embodiment, images 417 may be an ultrasonic mechanism foi mcd on semiconductor substiatcs It is important to note here an advantage ovci the 'challenge-response ' authentication method presented m U.S. Pat. No. 5,420,908 (referred to as the Secret- Key) In the piescnl invention, "key" need not be pcisi tcntly stored in ihc FCPD 101 module Theref ore the wireless telephone cannot be used by any othei user even when it is lost oi stolen. In a preferred embodiment, telephone 102 is a conventional wuclcss telephone. Il communicates with FCPD 101 ovci a connection line 407 which may be a parallel oi serial connection. Telephone 102 may contain a key pad 41 1 , all necessary telecommunication functions 413 (including a stored MIN and provisions foi gcπciatmg a dialed numbci f rom key pad inputs), dala bus lines 412, and .in interface port 410 foi communicating with FCPD 101 (over connection line 407) and with wireless stations such as an MSC. It is important to note that interface port 410 should be capable of inlci facing not only voice communication signals (loi standaid mobile phone operation), but othci communication f or control between the CAS 106 and the FCPD 101 to complete the "challenge-response" authentication. In a preferred embodiment, interface port 410 is capable of sending and receiving fingerprint data over a data channel which operates at a different frequency fiom a communications channel which sends and receives the wireless communications (e.g., voice data). Preferably, FCPD 101 is integrated directly within the casing of a conventional wireless telephone or other communication source. The only distinction being the presence of a fingerprint capture window on the side of the telephone and accessing imagci 417 In an especially preferred embodiment, a single integrated ciicuit provides most of the functions of FCPD 101 and telephone 102. These functions include, for example, CPU 401 , memory 404, and telecom I unctions 413. As functions from both FCPD 101 and telephone 102 arc provided on the same chip, interface port 402 and connection line 407 are not required. A modified vcision of interface port 410 having only ihc functionality necessary to communicate with other wirciess stations (not FCPD 101 ) may be employed on the integrated circuit. This single chip embodiment has the advantage an extra layer of security as thieves will be unable lo directly monitor signals crossing connection line 407. If fingerprint imagcr 417 is a CMOS unagci, it may integrated with other components on the integrated circuit. If imager 417 is a CCD array, it typically will have to be provided on a separate chip. Suitable design parameters of FCPD 101 can be specified based upon the general requirements of fingerprint analysis and matching algorithms. A typical human fingerprint has an aspect ratio of about three to iwo; that is, it is one-half times as long as it is wide. The average fingerprint has aboul 50 lidgclincs separated by inlcrvcniiig valley lines thai are about equally as thick. Gencially the lines run from lei l to right and as they do they first traverse upwards and later downwards. Given this amount of information, the Fedeial Bureau of Investigation has suggested that fingerprint detection systems should provide an array of 512x512 pixels since it allows for at least four pixels per πdgcline and four per valley line. Preferably, though not necessarily, the imagcr employed in the FCPD 101 contains an array of al least 5 12x512 pixels. Using sophisticated fingerprint imaging algorithms such as those described in the above-referenced US Provisional Application 60//025.949, significantly smaller arrays can be employed. In one embodiment, the array may include 240x 160 pixels or, in anther embodiment, 1 20 160 pixels. The use of such small arrays has ihc advantage ot requiring ( I ) less processing resources fiom CPU 401 and (2) less space liom memory 404 during processing ot a large array of fingerprint data. Accurate fingciprint matching technology, which is well-known in the ait (sec. foi example, U.S. Pat. No. 2 952 181 , 4 151 512, 4 322 163, 4 537 484, 4 747 147, 5 467 403 which were previously incorporated by reference), has for over a hundred yeais relied on the extraction and subsequent comparison of specialized features called minutiae Minutiae arc essentially of two equally frequent types - cither the abrupt ending of a line in the middle of the fingerprint or the fusion of two lines to create a Y-shaped junction. Typically there arc about 60 or 70 such features in a fingerprint and it is the relative location of these from each other that creates a unique spalial pattern that statistically no other human can possess. Suitable methods of fingciprint matching may involve software processing steps as illustrated in FIG. 5. After capturing the fingerprint image (step 501 ), a contrasting algorithm (step 503) reduces all the gray shades of a captured image 502 to either black (for πdgciincs) oi white (for valley lines) as shown in image 504. Traditionally these algorithms are omni-dircciional. Basically, the particular shade of gray at each pixel is compared with those of the neighboring pixels in all directions and if judged to be relatively darker than most of Us neighbors it is deemed to be black, olhci wisc white. Alter this contrasting step, ihc conliastcd image 504 is further piocessed by a thinning algorithm (step 505). The object here is to reduce the black lines liom being on avciagc fotu pixels thick to only one pixel thick, thereby increasing the number of white pixels substantially. A thinned image 506 is then examined by fuilhci algonthms (step 507) thai attempt to deduce and accuiatcly extract the minutiae and their locations as shown m a map 508. The pioccss is then completed at 509 All further f ingciprint malching/compaiison ollen relies pπmanly on ihcsc 60 oi 70 extracted pieces of information. Ccntial authentication system (CAS) 106 is preferably, though not ncccssai ily, provided as α server or other node connected to one oi more MSCs ovci α public switched telephone nctwoi k CAS 106 may also have wireless connection to Λ MSC υi may even form a part ol the MSC. Generally, CAS 106 must be able lo generate and compare challenges, access a database ol l ingei pi inl based tokens, and communicate with a pluiα ty of wiicicss souiccs (e.g., mobile ccllulai telephones) via the one oi more MSCs. FIG. 6 is a diagram ol CAS 106 in accordance with one embodiment of this invention. The design is superf icially similar to the FCPD 101 (and the design presented in U.S. Pat. No. 5,420,908). Connected lo CAS 106 are PSTN 105 and MCKD 107. CAS 106 must be able lo handle, simultaneously, many calls fiom many wireless cαmcis It includes a memory 605 including a persistently stored piogram 606 and various tcmporai ily stored ilcm.s including a challenge 607, a response token 60S. and α dcciypted message 609. Piogram 606 contains the instructions foi gcnciating a challenge, cnciypting the challenge with a fingciprint based token, validating a decrypted challenge (e.g., by comparison with ihc gcncialcd challenge), fingci print matching based on tokens, and. in some embodiments, compai ing a response lokcn with one oi more stored tokens and further assuring that lokcns are not identical as that would imply illegal use Response token 608 is a memory cntily containing the token sent back fiom the FCPD 101 in the w ireless telephone 102 before token matching is conducted. When a new token is piovided from FCPD, stored token is updated In addition, CAS 106 includes a CPU 602 foi controlling the execution of a program 606, accessing memory 605, communicating with the MSCs over the PSTN. Communication over the PSTN is piovided through a data inter ace 601 in CAS 106 which is connected lo the PSTN ovci a line 105. In addition, CAS 106 communicates with MCKD database 107 through a database interface 603 as shown. CPU 602, memory 605, database interlace 603, and data intci lace 601 are communicate with one another over a data bus 604. In a preferred embodiment, ihc initial registration of the phone-owner's fingerprint at the CAS 106 lo create the appropriate entry into the MCKD 107 need not require the user to visit the central phone sci vice providci . When the phone-owner purchases or rents the wireless phone al any local phone stoic he or she can use ihc FCPD 101 on ihc newly purchased wireless telephone 102 itself to activate registry at the CAS 106 via the common air interface and MSC 103. The phone's ESN and MIN can be sent along with the owner's fingcrpi int and placed in the CAS database foi future use. In yet anolhci embodiment of the present invention, multiple users can be permitted to use the same wireless phone All that is required is that ihc MCKD 107 at the CAS 106 be allowed lo contain multiple CKs 202, one generated fi om each user of Ihc same phone. Such authouzation can in puπciplc be activated/initiated by the phone owner serving as a master user who can at any time recruit additional users to be able to use their phone By activating appiopi iate buttons on the phone, the master user can in principle activate the phone and the CAS 106 to receive a newly recruited user's fingerprint foi association with the maslci user's entry in the MCKD 107. The master user can remotely authoii c this action by simply validating it with his/her fingerprint. Again by engaging a pre-defined sequence ol buttons on the phone the master user could also in principle remove previously authoi i cd co-users. In a lurlhcr embodiment ol the present invention, the phone ownci could use more than one f ingerprint as a means lo authenticate his/her identity The MCKD 107 can be ai ranged lo contain mfoi mation icgaiding more than one f ingerprint ol the ownci In f act, if additional password-like secui ily beyond fingciprint security is desired, the ownci CΔI\ piovidc multiple fingerprints fiom different lingers in a particular sccict oidci . This can serve as a "password" known only lo ihc owner. In one use of Ihc current invention, the tiaditional MINs and ESNs associated with wireless phones arc no iongcr required. The wireless telephone 102 will have an integrated FCPD 101. When a user dials a number, the number of ihc party being called and the token generated from the fingerprint of the user on the FCPD 101 will be sent to the MSC 103 and then forwarded to the CAS 106 for authentication based only on ihc fingerprint lokcn of the user for billing and authorization purposes. Because each fingerprint token generated from the same finger will be different, a token intercepted from the common an interface can not easily be used for fraudulent use of wireless telephones. If a particular token generated from a fingciprint is captured illegally from the air inlerfacc and subsequently used repeatedly to authorize illegal calls, this can be detected very easily by ihc CAS 106 since u would in normal circumstances expect somewhat different and vaπcd tokens being gcnci atcd fiom the same fingerprint. Because such vauations in the generated token arc intrinsic to the way fingerprint information is distributed on the finger itself, these variations cannot be gleaned fiom illegally capturing one lokcn common from the common air interface. That is, tokens generated from ihc same fingciprint at different impressions on ihe FCPD 101 will v.uy so thai merely having illegally captured one ol ihcsc v.u unions will not enable the geneialion ol v.u icd lokciis that are still meαninglully related lo the ouginal fingerprint The only thing that can be done is to use the exact same illegally captured token to make illegal calls, but that can be easily detected Thus il is possible that the systems of this invention can allow any user to use any wireless telephone to place calls. In another use of the cui cnl invention, the identity ol Ihc user can be authenticated for the purpose of identifying the callci's personal identity lather than merely ihe phone numbci fiom ihc caller initialed ihc call - 1 c. ihc source terminal-ID. In one embodiment of the present invention, αl step 3 19 (FIG. 3), Ihc caller's personal identity as delci mined by the CAS 106 can be made available lo ihc call contiol entity oi the recipient ol the call. Based on the prior knowledge of who the caller is (and not just merely what phone number thc callci is calling liom) ihe call recipient may elect to block the call even after it has been authenticated as being non-fiaudulent at step 314. The current invention also piovidcs a method for the identification of the caller (caller ID) oiiginalmg ihc phone call. In recent years, caller ID technology (where the phone number of the callci's phone is automatically revealed to the call control entily oi the recipient of the phone call in a manna thai allows the recipient lo screen his oi hci calls) has become increasingly commonplace. In effect. calici-ID as piaciiccd today is really terminal-ID (the ID of Ihc caller's phone) and not really the pcisonal identity of the callci. With Ihc present invention, wireless and tiadilional wired phones thai have Ihc built-in capacity lo capture/compare fingcrpiint information and communicate with an MSC for authorization can allow the caller lo be personally identified (lather than simply the callci's phone number ) to the call control entity or the recipient f or call screening oi othei authentication pui poses Indeed, both the caller-ID and the tctminal-ID can be jointly authenticated lor an even higher level of security in phone nctwoiks. As mentioned, the technology described herein may be employed in contexts other than cellular telephone systems. For example, the invention may be employed to ensure secure access to a vehicle with a wireless security system Many automobiles now employ wireless systems lo allow remote contiol of door locking, automotive alarm systems, lighting, etc. within ihc automobile When the owner appioachcs his oi her car, he or she can unlock the car doors or aciivalc/inactivatc other car systems before actually reaching ihc car. This is accomplished with ihc click of a button on a wireless control module. Unfortunately, if such a module fails into the hands of a thief (or if the wireless signal is illegally captured through the air and decoded), he may be able lo circumvent Ihe car's security mcchanism(s) and obtain control of the car. The present invention provides a mechanism to protect against this possibility. Wirciess car security systems of this invention may employ a wireless control module (source) containing the logic necessary for capturing and transmitting a token based upon a user's fingci print. The logic may be contained within a module as described above with reference to FCPD 101 . Generally, ihe vehicle itself may provide most of the functionality described above with reference lo CAS 106. Of course, it need not provide access lo a PSTN or database 107. However, it should include a finger print token of the car operator and possibly multiple recently received tokens so that access may be blocked if the token exactly matches a received token. The vehicle protection mechanism of this invention may operate as follows. First, the system on board the vehicle determines that a request for access to the vehicle has been initiated from a wireless source. Next, the vehicle system determines whether the source fingciprint data provided at ihc wireless source matches stored fingciprint data provided for the vehicle. Access to ihc vehicle is then permitted (e.g., car doors arc unlocked) if the source fingerprint data matches the stored fingciprint data. In some embodiments, the wirciess source may prompt its user for a fingerprint from which to generate ihe source fingerprint data. In especially preferred embodiments, a full chalienge-response protocol as described above with reference to Figures 3A and 3B is employed. This may involve generating an encrypted challenge from a challenge and a token based on the fingerprint data stored with the automobile. Then, the encrypted challenge and the stored fingerprint token are sent to the source where the stored and source fingerprints arc compared. If they match, one of the fingerprints is used to decrypt the encrypted challenged. The now decrypted challenge and the source fingerprint data arc then sent back to the automobile where the decrypted challenge is confinned and the source and stored fingeiprints are again compared. If all tests arc passed, access to the automobile is permitted. While the present invention has been described in terms of a preferred embodiment and certain variations thereof, the scope should not be limited to the specifics presented above For example, while the system of this invention has been described as including a central authentication system separated from a mobile switching center by a public switched telephone network, the invention may be implemented by providing the central authentication system within ihc mobile switching center. In this case, it may be ncccssaiy to provide a mechanism loi icgulai iy updating the authentication system at each mobile switching ccntci Further, the invention may be advantageously employed in systems that do not employ a secret key Importantly, the invention may rely on biomctuc mfoimation other than fingci punts Examples of such alternative biomctuc information include, bul aic not limited to, a usci 's voice, peisonal mfoimation, photogiaph, hand shape, and retina. Many si ilαi vαnαtions on ihc abovc-desenbed preferred embodiment, may be employed Therefore, ihc invention should be bioadly interpreted with reference to the following claims

Claims: CLA IMS what i churned i - 1 . A method for authenticating a call to be made over a communication system, the method compi ismg: (a) determining that the call has been initialed from a source, (b) determining whelhci source f ingci pi inl dαla piovided l i om said source matches stored fingci prml dala associated with said source; and (c) if said source fingerprint data matches said stored fingci punt data, allowing said call to be completed. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein ihc communication system forms at least part of a wireless telephone nciwoi k. 3 The method of claim 2, wherein the call initiated f i om ihc source may be forwaidcd through any of a plurality of mobile switching centers. 4. The method of claim 2, wherein said source is a mobile cellular telephone. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein determining that a call is being initiated includes detecting transmission of at least one of a mobile identification number (MIN) and an electronic serial number (ESN) associated with the mobile cellular telephone. 6. The method of claim 5 further comprising confirming that said at least one of the MIN and the ESN is valid. 7. The method ol claim I further compi ising. requesting that said source fingerprint dala be provided fiom the souicc of said call. 8. The method of claim I , wherein said fingci print data is provided in an lntcr- minuliac distancc-vcctor-dcπvcd format. 9. The method of claim i , lurthcr comprising: encrypting a challenge with Ihc stored fingciprint data lo produce an encrypted challenge; and providing the encrypted challenge to the source for the purpose of decrypting by the source with the source fingerprint data. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the step of determining whether the source and stoicd fingcrpi int data match comprises: receiving a decrypted challenge from said source, which decrypted challenge has been decrypted with the source fingerprint data; and comparing ihc challenge with the decrypted challenge from the source I 1 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining whcthci the source fingciprint data is identical lo one oi more instances of sample fingerprint data previously received; and if the source and any one of the instances of the sample fingerprint data are identical, preventing the call fiom being completed 12. The method of claim 1 , where the fingciprint data is provided in a timcstamp. 1 3 A method lor accessing a vehicle with a wireless security system, the method compi ising: (a) determining that a request for access lo Ihe vehicle has been initialed fiom a wireless source; (b) dclct mining whether source fingciprint data provided at said wireless source matches stored fingcipi inl data piovided for the vehicle; and (c) if said source fingeipnnt data matches said stored fingeipnnt data, allowing access to the vehicle 14. The method ol claim 13, iuithci compiising piomptmg a user oi said wireless source foi a fingerprint from which to generate the source fingeipnnt data. 15. The method of claim 13, wherein ihc sloied fingeipnnt data is stored in the vehicle. 1 6. The method of claim 13, wherein the vehicle is a car and allowing access to the car compuscs unlocking the car. 17. A method for authenticating a call to be made over a communication system, the method compi ising: (a) tiansmitlmg a dialed number to a switching center on said communication network; (b) receiving a user ' s fingerprint: (c) generating source fingerprint data from said user's fingeipnnt: and (d) if the source fingciprint dala matches slored fingerprint dala associated with user, completing the call. 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the communication system forms at least a part of a ireless telephone network. 19. The method of claim 18, wherein (a) through (d) arc performed by a mobile cellular telephone 20. The method of claim 17, further comprising: liansmitting aL least one of a MIN and an ESN lo said switching center. 2 1 . The method ol claim 17. further comprising: piompling the user to provide a fingerprint. 22. The method of claim 17, wherein generating source fingerprint data provides the source fingerprint data in a format comprising lnlcr-minuliac distancc-vcctor- derived information. 23. The method of claim 17, further comprising: determining w hether the source fingerprint data matches the stored fingciprint data prior lo completing the cali. 24. The method ol claim 23, wherein the stored f ingerprint data is provided from a database on a public switched telephone network. 25. The method of claim 17, further comprising: receiving an encrypted challenge from the switching center; decrypting the encrypted challenge with the source fingerprint data to produce a decrypted challenge; and transmitting said decrypted challenge lo ihe switching center, such that if the decrypted challenge is found lo match an unencrypted challenge, specifying that the source fingciprint data matches the stored fingerprint data. 26. The mctliod of claim 17, wherein generating source fingeipnnt data provides the source fingerprint data in a formal comprising a timcstamp. 27. A wireless communication device capable of rendering wireless communications secure by requiring biomctric information from a user, the device comprising: (a) a wireless communications interface for sending and receiving wireless communications; (b) a device for capturing ihc user's fingcipiinl; and (c) a pi ccssi g device capable of converting the user's fingerprint to source fingci print data which can be transmitted. 2S. The device of claim 27. wherein the device is a wirciess telephone 29. The device of claim 28, wherein the wireless telephone includes a casing and provided within said casing are ihc device for capturing the user ' s fingerprint and the processing device. 30. The device of claim 27, wherein the wireless communications interface is capable of sending ihc source fingerprint data to a remote location. 3 1 . The device of claim 30, wherein the wireless communications interface is capable of sending and receiving fingerprint data over a data channel which operates at a different frequency from a communications channel which sends and receives the wireless communications. 32. The device of claim 27. wherein ihe device lor capturing the user's fingerprint includes: a fingerprint capture surface on which the user can place his or her finger lo produce an optical image of ihc user's fingerprint; an imagcr capable of generating an electronic image of the user's fingerprint; and optics for directing ihc optical image of the user's fingerprint from the finger print caplurc surface to the imagcr. 33. The device of claim 32, wherein the imagcr is selected from the group consisting of CCD arrays and CMOS photodiodc/phologatc arrays. 34. The device of claim 33. wherein the imagcr is a CMOS photodiodc/phologatc array which is provided on an integrated circuit together with Ihc processing device. 35. The device ol claim 27, wherein the device for capturing the user's fingerprint is a capacilor airay formed on a semiconductor substrate or an ultrasonic mechanism formed on a semiconductor substrate 36. The device of claim 27. wherein the pioccssing device is a CPU. 37. The device of claim 27, wherein the processing device is capable of comparing the source fingci pi inl data with stored fingciprint data received from α remote location, whereby when the source and stored fingerprint data arc found to malch. the device allows a communication to proceed. 38. The device of claim 37, wherein the processing device is capable of decrypting a challenge received fiom said remote location 39. A ccntial authcnticalion system connected lo a communications nctwoik and capable of rendering wireless communications secure by pioccssing biomelnc information from a user, the device comprising: (a) a communications interlace foi sending and receiving data communications over said communications nctwoik; (b) α database interface for accessing a database containing stored fingerprint data associated with users of wireless communications devices; and (c) a pioccssoi capable of determining whether α wireless communication from a wireless communications device should be pcrmitlcd based upon a match between α fingcrpiint taken f iom said wireless communications device and stored fingerprint data associated the wireless communications device 40. The ccntial authcnticalion system of claim 39, wherein the communications interface is coupled to a public switched telephone network. 4 1 . The ccntial authentication system of claim 40, wherein the data communications arc directed to one or more mobile switching centers. 42. The central authcnticalion system of claim 39, wherein the database includes, for at least one of aid wireless communications devices, a plurality of received tokens containing information from fingeiprints taken al said wuclcss communications device. 43 The ccntial authentication system of claim 42, wherein the processor is capable ol compaung a newly received token f iom a given wireless communication device with said plui a ty of tokens lor said given wireless communications device. 44. The central authentication system of claim 39, wherein Ihc pioccssor is capable of gencialmg an encrypted challenge by encrypting α challenge with a token containing said stored l ingei pi inl dala. 45. The central authentication system of claim 39, further comprising a memory w hich persistently stoics a piogram allowing the processor to determine whethei wireless communications liom Ihc wireless communications devices should be permuted. 46. The central authentication system of claim 45, wherein the mcmoiy can stoic α challenge and α dcci yptcd challenge so that the pi occssoi can dctcimmc whether ihc challenge and the decrypted challenge match.

Inventors: LI YANG, RAO D RAMESK K, SUBBIAH SUBRAMANIAN, LI, YANG, RAO, D., RAMESK, K., SUBBIAH, SUBRAMANIAN
Applicants: LI YANG, RAO D RAMESK K, SUBBIAH SUBRAMANIAN, LI, YANG, RAO, D., RAMESK, K., SUBBIAH, SUBRAMANIAN
Application year: 1997
Main classification: H04Q7
IPC codes: B60R25, G07C9, H04W12