COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR TREATING PLANTS WITH EXOGENOUS CHEMICALS

Abstract: Methods and compositions are disclosed wherein exogenous chemicals are applied to plants to generate a desired biological response. One embodiment of the present invention is a plant treatment composition that comprises (a) a water-soluble exogenous chemical and (b) an adjuvant amount of a solid inorganic particulate colloidal material. Another embodiment of the present invention is an aqueous concentrate plant treatment composition that comprises (a) a water-soluble exogenous chemical, (b) an aqueous diluent, (c) a surfactant component comprising one or more nonionic surfactant(s), and (d) an amount of a solid inorganic particulate colloidal material effective to stabilize the composition, said composition not exhibiting phase separation over a period of time T when stored in a closed container at a temperature in the range from about 15 DEG C to about 30 DEG C; T being in the range from about 1 hour to about 60 days; wherein the exogenous chemical and the surfactant are present at concentrations in the absolute or relative to each other such that, in the absence of the colloidal material, phase separation would occur during said period of time T.

Description: COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR TREATING PLANTS WITH EXOGENOUS CHEMICALS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to formulations and methods for enhancing the efficacy of exogenous chemicals used in treating plants. An exogenous chemical, as defined herein, is any chemical substance, whether naturally or synthetically derived, which (a) has biological activity or is capable of releasing in a plant an ion, moiety or derivative which has biological activity, and (b) is applied to a plant with the intent or result that the chemical substance or its biologically active ion, moiety or derivative enter living cells or tissues of the plant and elicit a stimulatory, inhibitory, regulatory, therapeutic, toxic or lethal response in the plant itself or in a pathogen, parasite or feeding organism present in or on the plant. Examples of exogenous chemical substances include, but are not limited to, chemical pesticides (such as herbicides, algicides. fungicides, bactericides, viricides, insecticides, aphicides, miticides, nematicides, molluscicides, and the like), plant growth regulators, fertilizers and nutrients, gametocides, defoliants, desiccants, mixtures thereof, and the like. Exogenous chemicals, including foliar-applied herbicides, have at times been formulated with surfactants, so that when water is added, the resulting sprayable composition is more easily and effectively retained on the foliage (e.g., the leaves or other photosynthesizing organs) of plants. Surfactants can also bring other benefits, including improved contact of spray droplets with a waxy leaf surface and, in some cases, improved penetration of the accompanying exogenous chemical into the interior of leaves. Through these and perhaps other effects, surfactants have long been known to increase the biological effectiveness of herbicide compositions, or other compositions of exogenous chemicals, when added to or included in such compositions. Thus, for example, the herbicide glyphosate (N- phosphonomethylglycine) has been formulated with surfactants such as polyoxyalkylene-type surfactants including, among other surfactants, polyoxyalkylene alkylamines. Commercial formulations of glyphosate herbicide marketed under the trademark ROUNDUP® have been formulated with a surfactant composition based on such a polyoxyalkylene alkylamine, in particular a polyethoxylated tallowamine, this surfactant composition being identified as MON 0818. Surfactants have generally been combined with glyphosate or other exogenous chemicals either in a commercial concentrate (herein referred to as a "coformulation"), or in a diluted mixture that is prepared from separate compositions, one comprising an exogenous chemical (e.g. glyphosate) and another comprising surfactant, prior to use in the field (i.e., a tank mix). Various combinations of exogenous chemicals and surfactants or other adjuvants have been tested in the past. In some instances, the addition of a particular surfactant has not produced uniformly positive or negative changes in the effect of the exogenous chemical on the plant (e.g., a surfactant that may enhance the activity of a particular herbicide on certain weeds may interfere with, or antagonize, the herbicidal efficacy on another weed species). Some surfactants tend to degrade fairly rapidly in aqueous solutions. As a result, surfactants that exhibit this property can only be used effectively in tank mixes (i.e., mixed with the other ingredients in solution or dispersion in the tank soon before spraying is to occur), rather than being coformulated in an aqueous composition with the other ingredients in the first instance. This lack of stability, or inadequate shelf-life, has hindered the use of certain surfactants in some exogenous chemical formulations. Other surfactants, though chemically stable, are physically incompatible with certain exogenous chemicals, particularly in concentrate coformulations. For example, most classes of nonionic surfactant, including polyoxyethylene alkylether surfactants, do not tolerate solutions of high ionic strength, as for example in a concentrated aqueous solution of a salt of glyphosate. Physical incompatibility can also lead to inadequate shelf-life. Other problems that can arise from such incompatibility include the formation of aggregates large enough to interfere with commercial handling and application, for example by blocking spray nozzles. Another problem that has been observed in the past is the effect of environmental conditions on uptake of an exogenous chemical composition into foliage of a plant. For example, conditions such as temperature, relative humidity, presence or absence of sunlight, and health of the plant to be treated, can affect the uptake of a herbicide into the plant. As a result, spraying exactly the same herbicidal composition in two different situations can result in different herbicidal control of the sprayed plants. One consequence of the above-described variability is that often a higher rate of herbicide per unit area is applied than might actually be required in that situation, in order to be certain that adequate control of undesired plants will be achieved. For similar reasons, other foliar-applied exogenous chemicals are also typically applied at significantly higher rates than needed to give the desired biological effect in the particular situation where they are used, to allow for the natural variability that exists in efficiency of foliar uptake. A need therefore exists for compositions of exogenous chemicals that, through more efficient uptake into plant foliage, allow reduced use rates. Many exogenous chemicals are commercially packaged as a liquid concentrate that contains a significant amount of water. The packaged concentrate is shipped to distributors or retailers. Ultimately the packaged concentrate ends up in the hands of an end user, who further dilutes the concentrate by adding water in accordance with label instructions on the package. The dilute composition thus prepared is then sprayed on plants. A significant portion of the cost of such packaged concentrates is the cost of transporting the concentrate from the manufacturing site to the location where the end user purchases it. Any liquid concentrate formulation that contained relatively less water and thus more exogenous chemical would reduce the cost per unit amount of exogenous chemical. However, one important limit on the ability of the manufacturer to increase the loading of the exogenous chemical in the concentrate is the stability of that formulation. With some combinations of ingredients, a limit will be reached at which any further reduction of water content in the concentrate will cause it to become unstable (e.g., to separate into discrete layers), which may make it commercially unacceptable. Accordingly, a need exists for improved formulations of exogenous chemicals, particularly herbicides, that are stable, effective, less sensitive to environmental conditions, and permit the use of reduced amounts of exogenous chemical to achieve the desired biological effect in or on plants. A need also exists for stable liquid concentrate formulations of exogenous chemicals that contain less water and more exogenous chemical than prior art concentrates. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to novel methods and compositions wherein exogenous chemicals are applied to plants to generate a desired biological response. One embodiment of the present invention is a plant treatment composition that comprises (a) a water-soluble exogenous chemical and (b) an adjuvant amount of a solid inorganic particulate colloidal material. By "adjuvant amount" is meant an amount sufficient to provide visibly improved biological effectiveness of the exogenous chemical by comparison with an otherwise similar composition lacking the colloidal material. Optimum concentrations in a sprayable aqueous composition depend on the exogenous chemical, the biological effect desired and the plant species to which the composition is to be applied, and can readily be determined for any particular situation by routine testing. In most situations the optimum concentration of colloidal particulate will be found in the range from about 0.001% to about 0.5% by weight, more particularly from about 0.01% to about 0.5% by weight, of the sprayable composition. In this embodiment of the invention, the colloidal particulate substitutes in whole or in part for surfactant in enhancing the biological effectiveness of the exogenous chemical. Accordingly a composition ofthis embodiment of the invention contains no surfactant, or if a surfactant is present the maximum amount S of surfactant is one-tenth of the amount of exogenous chemical in the composition. In compositions having amounts of surfactant greater than S above, colloidal particulates can in some circumstances still provide enhancement of biological effectiveness but such enhancement is likely to be modest in comparison with that provided by the surfactant. In such compositions, a greater benefit of colloidal particulates is that they enable aqueous concentrate formulations to be prepared at high concentrations of exogenous chemical and/or surfactant without the common attendant problem of phase separation. This is especially true where the surfactant is nonionic. Accordingly, another embodiment of the present invention is an aqueous concentrate plant treatment composition that comprises (a) a water-soluble exogenous chemical, (b) an aqueous diluent, (c) a surfactant component comprising one or more nonionic surfactant(s), and (d) an amount of a solid inorganic particulate colloidal material effective to stabilize the composition, said composition not exhibiting phase separation over a period of time T as defined below when stored in a closed container at a temperature in the range from about 15°C to about 30°C; wherein the exogenous chemical and the surfactant are present at concentrations in the absolute or relative to each other such that, in the absence of the colloidal material, phase separation would occur during said period of time T. The period of time T over which a composition can be observed to determine if phase separation occurs is in the range from about 1 hour to about 60 days. "Phase separation" in the present context means separation of at least part of the surfactant component from other ingredients of the composition as a distinct phase. The particulate colloidal material preferably is present in the aqueous concentrate in an amount between about 0.01% and about 5% by weight, more preferably between about 0.5% and about 2.5% by weight, of the composition. By "aqueous concentrate" is meant a composition comprising water and from about 10% to about 60% by weight of the exogenous chemical. Preferred solid inorganic particulates include silicon oxides, aluminum oxides, titanium oxides, and mixtures thereof. In one preferred embodiment, the particulate colloidal material has an average specific surface area of about 50 to about 400 m 2 /g. In another embodiment, the particulate colloidal material has an average specific surface area of about 180 to about 400 m Ig. In yet another embodiment, the particulate colloidal material has a bimodal distribution of specific surface area whereby a first component of the colloidal material has an average specific surface area of about 50 to about 150 m /g and a second component of the colloidal material has an average specific surface area of about 180 to about 400 m 2 /g. The nonionic surfactant component of the composition, where present, preferably comprises one or more alkylether surfactants having the formula R 12 -0-(CH 2 CH 2 0) n (CH(CH 3 )CH 2 0) m -R 13 VI wherein R is an alkyl or alkenyl group having about 16 to about 22 carbon atoms, n is an average number of about 10 to about 100, m is an average number of 0 to about 5 and R is hydrogen or C 1 . 4 alkyl. The term "alkylether" as used herein should be understood to include alkenylether surfactants. 12 1 ^ More preferably R is a saturated straight-chain alkyl group, R is hydrogen, m is 0 and n is from about 10 to about 40, most preferably from about 20 to about 40. Most preferably the alkylether surfactant is a polyoxyethylene cetyl or stearyl ether or mixture thereof having 20-40 moles of ethylene oxide (EO). A wide variety of water-soluble exogenous chemicals can be used in the compositions and methods of the present invention. By "water-soluble" in this context is meant having a solubility in distilled water at 25°C greater than about 1% by weight. A preferred class is foliar-applied water-soluble exogenous chemicals, i.e. exogenous chemicals that are normally applied post-emergence to foliage of plants. Especially preferred foliar-applied water-soluble exogenous chemicals are salts that have an anion portion and a cation portion. In one embodiment of the invention, at least one of the anion and cation portions is biologically active and has a molecular weight of less than about 300. Particular examples of such exogenous chemicals where the cation portion is biologically active are paraquat, diquat and chlormequat. More commonly it is the anion portion that is biologically active. Another preferred subclass of exogenous chemicals is those that exhibit systemic biological activity in the plant. Within this subclass, an especially preferred group of exogenous chemicals is N- phosphonomethylglycine and its herbicidal derivatives. N-phosphonomethylglycine, often referred to by its common name glyphosate, can be used in its acid form, but is more preferably used in the form of a salt. Any water-soluble salt of glyphosate can be used in the practice ofthis invention. Some preferred salts include the sodium, potassium, ammonium, mono-, di-, tri- and tetra-Cι. 4 -alkylammonium, mono-, di- and tri-C^-alkanolammonium, mono-, di- and tri-C|. 4 -alkylsulfonium and sulfoxonium salts. The ammonium, monoisopropylammonium and trimethylsulfonium salts of glyphosate are especially preferred. Mixtures of salts can also be useful in certain situations. A composition of the present invention can have a number of different physical forms. For example, a composition comprising an exogenous chemical and colloidal particulate can further comprise water in an amount effective to make the composition a dilute aqueous composition ready for application to foliage of a plant, i.e. a sprayable composition or "spray composition". Such a composition typically contains about 0.02 to about 2% by weight of the exogenous chemical, but for some purposes can contain up to about 10% by weight or even more of the exogenous chemical. The composition can alternatively comprise a lesser amount of water such that the composition is an aqueous concentrate as defined above, suitable for dilution in water to form a sprayable composition. At the extreme the concentration contains 5% by weight or less, preferably 0.5% or less by weight, of water and is a solid composition comprising the exogenous chemical in an amount of about 10% to about 90% by weight. Such a solid composition can be, for example, a water-dispersible dry granular formulation. Preferably, water-dispersible granular formulations of the invention contain about 0.01% to about 10% by weight of colloidal particulate. Where the composition is an aqueous concentrate comprising a nonionic surfactant component, it is especially preferred for the exogenous chemical substance to be present in an aqueous phase of the composition in an amount of about 15 to about 45 percent by weight of the composition. In particular, such a composition can be, for example, an aqueous solution concentrate or an emulsion having an oil phase, in either case with the colloidal particulate suspended in the composition. If the composition is an emulsion, or more correctly a suspo-emulsion because of the presence of the colloidal particulate in suspension, it can more specifically be, for example, an oil-in-water emulsion, a water-in-oil emulsion, or a water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsion. In one embodiment of the invention, the composition further comprises a compound or mixture of compounds having the formula R 14 -CO-A-R 15 VII wherein R is a hydrocarbyl group having about 5 to about 21 carbon atoms, R is a hydrocarbyl group having 1 to about 14 carbon atoms, the total number of carbon atoms in R and R is about 1 1 to about 27, and A is O or NH. The compound of formula VII is preferably present at a concentration of about 0.1% to about 5% by weight. In one preferred embodiment, the weight/weight ratio of the compound of formula VII to the exogenous chemical is from about 1 :3 to about 1 : 100. It is particularly preferred that the weight/weight ratio of nonionic surfactant to the exogenous chemical is also from about 1 :3 to about 1: 100. In another embodiment, R is saturated in from about 40 to 100 percent by weight of all compounds having the stated formula present in the composition. R preferably has about 1 1 to about 21 carbon atoms, R 15 preferably has 1 to about 6 carbon atoms and A is preferably O. In certain preferred embodiments of the present invention, the compound of formula VII is a Cι -4 alkyl ester of a C 12- i 8 fatty a cid, more preferably a . 4 alkyl ester of a C 1 -I8 saturated fatty acid. Propyl, isopropyl or butyl esters of C 1 2- 1 s fatty acids, such as butyl stearate, are especially preferred. The compositions and methods of the present invention have a number of advantages. Those containing an alkylether surfactant of the formula shown above provide enhanced biological activity of exogenous chemicals in or on plants in comparison with prior formulations, either in terms of greater ultimate biological effect, or obtaining an equivalent biological effect while using a reduced application rate of exogenous chemical. In the absence of a surfactant component, compositions of the invention provide useful biological effect at remarkably low cost. Certain herbicide formulations of the present invention can avoid antagonism that has been observed in some prior art herbicide formulations, and can minimize quick production of necrotic lesions on leaves that in some situations hinder overall translocation of herbicide in the plant. Certain herbicide compositions of the invention modify the spectrum of activity of the herbicide across a range of plant species. For example, certain formulations of the present invention containing glyphosate can provide good herbicidal activity against broadleaf weeds while not losing any herbicidal effectiveness on narrowleaf weeds. Others can enhance herbicidal effectiveness on narrowleaf weeds to a greater extent than on broadleaf weeds. Still others can have enhanced effectiveness which is specific to a narrow range of species or even a single species. Another advantage of the present invention is that it employs relatively small amounts of the colloidal particulate and nonionic surfactant (if present) in relation to the amount of exogenous chemical employed. This makes the compositions and methods of the present invention relatively inexpensive, and also tends to reduce instability problems in specific compositions where the surfactant is physically incompatible with the exogenous chemical (e.g., alkylether surfactants in solutions of high ionic strength, such as concentrated glyphosate salt solutions). It is preferred that the weight/weight ratio of surfactant to exogenous chemical be in the range from about 1 :3 to about 1 :100. Even at such low concentrations of surfactant, there may be limits on the maximum concentration of exogenous chemical that can be used without causing compatibility problems (e.g., separation of the composition into discrete layers). In the present invention, composition stability at high loadings of exogenous chemical is maintained by adding colloidal particulates. Some compositions of the present invention exhibit enhanced biological activity and have a higher loading of exogenous chemical than is possible in prior art compositions. Further, compositions of the present invention are less sensitive in some instances to environmental conditions such as relative humidity at the time of application to the plant. Also, the present invention allows the use of smaller amounts of herbicides or other pesticides, while still obtaining the required degree of control of weeds or other undesired organisms. DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS Examples of water-soluble exogenous chemical substances that can be included in compositions of the present invention include, but are not limited to, chemical pesticides (such as herbicides, algicides, fungicides, bactericides, viricides, insecticides, aphicides, miticides, nematicides, molluscicides and the like), plant growth regulators, fertilizers and nutrients, gametocides, defoliants, desiccants, mixtures thereof and the like. A preferred group of exogenous chemicals are those that are normally applied post-emergence to the foliage of plants, i.e. foliar-applied exogenous chemicals. Exogenous chemicals useful in the present invention are water-soluble, for example salts that comprise biologically active ions, and also comprise counterions, which may be biologically inert or relatively inactive. By "water-soluble" herein is meant having a solubility in water sufficiently high that when formulated as a sprayable aqueous composition at a concentration of about 0.01% to about 1% by weight, substantially all the exogenous chemical present is in aqueous solution. A particularly preferred group of these water-soluble exogenous chemicals or their biologically active ions or moieties are systemic in plants, that is, they are to some extent translocated from the point of entry in the foliage to other parts of the plant where they can exert their desired biological effect. Especially preferred among these are herbicides, plant growth regulators and nematicides, particularly those that have a molecular weight, excluding counterions, of less than about 300. More especially preferred among these are exogenous chemical compounds having one or more functional groups selected from amine, carboxylate, phosphonate and phosphinate groups. Among such compounds, an even more preferred group are herbicidal or plant growth regulating exogenous chemical compounds having at least one of each of amine, carboxylate, and either phosphonate or phosphinate functional groups. Salts of N-phosphonomethylglycine are examples ofthis group of exogenous chemicals. Further examples include salts of glufosinate, for instance the ammonium salt (ammonium DL-homoalanin-4-yl (methyl) phosphinate). Another preferred group of exogenous chemicals which can be applied by the method of the invention are nematicides such as those disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,389,680, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Preferred nematicides ofthis group are salts of 3,4,4-trifluoro-3- butenoic acid or of N-(3,4,4-trifluoro- l-oxo-3-butenyl)glycine. Exogenous chemicals which can usefully be applied by the method of the present invention are normally, but not exclusively, those which are expected to have a beneficial effect on the overall growth or yield of desired plants such as crops, or a deleterious or lethal effect on the growth of undesirable plants such as weeds. The method of the present invention is particularly useful for herbicides, especially those that are normally applied post-emergence to the foliage of unwanted vegetation. Water-soluble herbicides which can be applied by the method of the present invention include but are not limited to any listed in standard reference works such as the "Herbicide Handbook," Weed Science Society of America. 1994, 7th Edition, or the "Farm Chemicals Handbook," Meister Publishing Company, 1997 Edition. Illustratively these herbicides include aminotriazole. asulam, bentazon, bialaphos, bipyridyls such as paraquat, dicamba, diphenylethers such as acifluorfen, fatty acids such as C 9-1 o fatty acids, fosamine, glufosinate, glyphosate, imidazolinones such as imazaquin and imazethapyr, phenoxies such as 2,4-D, picloram, and triclopyr. Herbicidally active derivatives of any known herbicide are also within the scope of the present invention if such derivatives are water-soluble. A herbicidally active derivative is any compound which is a minor structural modification, most commonly but not restrictively a salt, of a known herbicide. These compounds retain the essential activity of the parent herbicide, but may not necessarily have a potency equal to that of the parent herbicide. These compounds may convert to the parent herbicide before or after they enter the treated plant. Mixtures or coformulations of a water-soluble herbicide with other ingredients, including other herbicides which can be water-soluble or not, may likewise be employed. An especially preferred herbicide is N-phosphonomethylglycine (glyphosate), a salt, adduct or ester thereof, or a compound which is converted to glyphosate in plant tissues or which otherwise provides glyphosate ion. Glyphosate salts that can be used according to this invention include but are not restricted to alkali metal, for example sodium and potassium, salts; ammonium salt; alkylamine, for example dimethylamine and isopropylamine, salts; alkanolamine, for example ethanolamine, salts; alkylsulfonium, for example trimethylsulfonium, salts; sulfoxonium salts; and mixtures thereof. The herbicidal compositions sold by Monsanto Company as ROUNDUP® and ACCORD® contain the monoisopropylamine (IPA) salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine. The herbicidal compositions sold by Monsanto Company as ROUNDUP® Dry and RIVAL® contain the monoammonium salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine. The herbicidal composition sold by Monsanto Company as ROUNDUP® Geoforce contains the monosodium salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine. The herbicidal composition sold by Zeneca as TOUCHDOWN® contains the trimethylsulfonium salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine. The herbicidal properties of N-phosphonomethylglycine and its derivatives were first discovered by Franz, then disclosed and patented in U.S. Patent 3,799,758, issued March 26, 1974. A number of herbicidal salts of N-phosphonomethylglycine were patented by Franz in U.S. Patent 4,405,531, issued September 20, 1983. The disclosures of both of these patents are hereby incorporated by reference. Because the commercially most important herbicidal derivatives of N-phosphonomethylglycine are certain salts thereof, the glyphosate compositions useful in the present invention will be described in more detail with respect to such salts. These salts are well known and include ammonium, IPA, alkali metal (such as the mono-, di-, and trisodium salts, and the mono-, di-, and tripotassium salts), and trimethylsulfonium salts. Salts of N-phosphonomethylglycine are commercially significant in part because they are water soluble. The salts listed immediately above are highly water soluble, thereby allowing for highly concentrated solutions that can be diluted at the site of use. In accordance with the method of this invention as it pertains to glyphosate herbicide, an aqueous solution containing a herbicidally effective amount of glyphosate and other components in accordance with the invention is applied to foliage of plants. Such an aqueous solution can be obtained by dilution of a concentrated glyphosate salt solution with water, or dissolution or dispersion in water of a dry (e.g. granular, powder, tablet or briquette) glyphosate formulation. Exogenous chemicals should be applied to plants at a rate sufficient to give the desired biological effect. These application rates are usually expressed as amount of exogenous chemical per unit area treated, e.g. grams per hectare (g/ha). What constitutes a "desired effect" varies according to the standards and practice of those who investigate, develop, market and use a specific class of exogenous chemicals. For example, in the case of a herbicide, the amount applied per unit area to give 85% control of a plant species as measured by growth reduction or mortality is often used to define a commercially effective rate. Herbicidal effectiveness is one of the biological effects that can be enhanced through this invention. "Herbicidal effectiveness," as used herein, refers to any observable measure of control of plant growth, which can include one or more of the actions of (1) killing, (2) inhibiting growth, reproduction or proliferation, and (3) removing, destroying, or otherwise diminishing the occurrence and activity of plants. The herbicidal effectiveness data set forth herein report "inhibition" as a percentage following a standard procedure in the art which reflects a visual assessment of plant mortality and growth reduction by comparison with untreated plants, made by technicians specially trained to make and record such observations. In all cases, a single technician makes all assessments of percent inhibition within any one experiment or trial. Such measurements are relied upon and regularly reported by Monsanto Company in the course of its herbicide business. The selection of application rates that are biologically effective for a specific exogenous chemical is within the skill of the ordinary agricultural scientist. Those of skill in the art will likewise recognize that individual plant conditions, weather and growing conditions, as well as the specific exogenous chemical and formulation thereof selected, will affect the efficacy achieved in practicing this invention. Useful application rates for exogenous chemicals employed can depend upon all of the above conditions. With respect to the use of the method ofthis invention for glyphosate herbicide, much information is known about appropriate application rates. Over two decades of glyphosate use and published studies relating to such use have provided abundant information from which a weed control practitioner can select glyphosate application rates that are herbicidally effective on particular species at particular growth stages in particular environmental conditions. Herbicidal compositions of glyphosate or derivatives thereof are used to control a very wide variety of plants worldwide. Such compositions can be applied to a plant in a herbicidally effective amount, and can effectively control one or more plant species of one or more of the following genera without restriction: Abutilon, Amaranthus, Artemisia, Asclepias, Avena, Axonopus, Borreria, Brachiaria, Brassica, Bromus, Chenopodium, Cirsium, Commelina, Convolvulus, Cynodon, Cyperus, Digitaria, Echinochloa, Eleusine, Elymus, Equisetum, Erodium, Helianthus, Imperata, Ipomoea, Kochia, Lolium, Malva, Oryza, Ottochloa, Panicum, Paspaium, Phalaris, Phragmites, Polygonum, Portulaca, Pteridium, Pueraria, Rubus, Salsola, Setaria, Sida, Sinapis, Sorghum, Triticum, Typha, Ulex, Xanthium, and Zea. Particularly important species for which glyphosate compositions are used are exemplified without limitation by the following: Annual broadleaves: velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) buttonweed (Borreria spp.) oilseed rape, canola, indian mustard, etc. (Brassica spp.) commelina (Commelina spp.) filaree (Erodium spp.) sunflower (Helianthus spp.) morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) kochia (Kochia scoparia) mallow (Malva spp.) wild buckwheat, smartweed, etc. (Polygonum spp.) purslane (Portulaca spp.) russian thistle (Salsola spp.) sida (Sida spp.) wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) cocklebur (Xanthium spp.) Annual narrowleaves: wild oat (Avena fatua) carpetgrass (Axonopus spp.) downy brome (Bromus tectorum) crabgrass (Digitaria spp.) barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) goosegrass (Eleusine indica) annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) rice (Oryza sativa) ottochloa (Ottochloa nodosa) bahiagrass (Paspaium notatum) canarygrass (Phalaris spp.) foxtail (Setaria spp.) wheat (Triticum aestivum) corn (Zea mays) Perennial broadleaves: mugwort (Artemisia spp.) milkweed (Asclepias spp.) Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) kudzu (Pueraria spp.) Perennial narrowleaves: brachiaria (Brachiaria spp.) bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) purple nutsedge (C. rotundus) quackgrass (Elymus repens) lalang (Imperata cylindrica) perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) guineagrass (Panicum maximum) dallisgrass (Paspaium dilatatum) reed (Phragmites spp.) johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) cattail (Typha spp.) Other perennials: horsetail (Equisetum spp.) bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) blackberry (Rubus spp.) gorse (Ulex europaeus) Thus, the method of the present invention, as it pertains to glyphosate herbicide, can be useful on any of the above species. Effectiveness in greenhouse tests, usually at exogenous chemical rates lower than those normally effective in the field, is a proven indicator of consistency of field performance at normal use rates. However, even the most promising composition sometimes fails to exhibit enhanced performance in individual greenhouse tests. As illustrated in the Examples herein, a pattern of enhancement emerges over a series of greenhouse tests; when such a pattern is identified this is strong evidence of biological enhancement that will be useful in the field. Aqueous concentrate compositions in some circumstances are limited in the degree to which an exogenous chemical such as glyphosate can be loaded. At some point, as the loading of exogenous chemical is increased, the composition will not remain suitably stable. Addition of a small amount of colloidal particulate to such compositions has surprisingly been found to greatly increase loading ability while retaining desired stability. Inclusion of such colloidal particulates can also enhance biological activity of an exogenous chemical formulation, particularly in the absence of surfactant. Oxides of silicon, aluminum and titanium are preferred colloidal particulate materials. Particle size is preferably such that specific surface area is in the range from about 50 to about 400 m /g. Where the exogenous chemical is glyphosate, the use of colloidal particulate enables loadings of at least 30% by weight for compositions containing sufficient alkylether surfactant and fatty acid ester such as butyl stearate to show enhanced herbicidal effectiveness, or at least 40% by weight for compositions containing alkylether surfactant but no fatty acid ester, and showing herbicidal effectiveness at least equal to current commercial products loaded at about 30% by weight. We have found especially useful improvement in storage stability can be obtained using colloidal particulates having specific surface area between about 180 and about 400 m 2 /g. Compositions of the present invention can optionally include a long-chain alkylether surfactant having the formula VI above. R can be branched or unbranched, saturated or unsaturated. R is preferably straight-chain saturated C| 6 alkyl (cetyl) or straight-chain saturated C| 8 alkyl (stearyl). In preferred alkylethers m is 0, n is an average number from about 20 to about 40 and R 1 is preferably hydrogen. Among especially preferred alkylether surfactants are those identified in the International Cosmetic Ingredient Directory as ceteth-20, ceteareth-20, ceteareth-27, steareth-20 and steareth-30. Compositions of the present invention can optionally further include amides or esters of formula VII above. R in formula VII is preferably aliphatic and has about 7 to about 21 carbon atoms, more preferably about 13 to about 21 carbon atoms. It is especially preferred that R be a saturated straight- chain alkyl group. R is preferably an aliphatic group having 1-6 carbon atoms, more preferably alkyl or alkenyl having 2-4 carbon atoms. An especially preferred compound of formula VII for use as the second excipient substance is butyl stearate. As compounds of formula VII, including butyl stearate, are generally oily liquids, aqueous compositions containing them are typically emulsions having at least one aqueous phase and at least one oil phase, with the compound of formula VII being present predominantly in the oil phase. Such emulsions may be water-in-oil, oil-in-water or water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) multiple emulsions. Compositions in accordance with the present invention are typically prepared by combining water, the exogenous chemical, the colloidal particulate, the nonionic surfactant if one is to be used, and any other formulation ingredients to be included. Details of a specific process used to prepare such compositions are included in the Examples herein. The concentrations of the various components will vary, in part depending on whether a concentrate is being prepared that will be further diluted before spraying onto a plant, or whether a solution or dispersion is being prepared that can be sprayed without further dilution. In an aqueous glyphosate formulation that includes a Cι 6 „ι 8 alkylether surfactant and butyl stearate, suitable concentrations can be: glyphosate 0.1 - 400 g a.e./l, alkylether surfactant 0.001 - 10% by weight, and butyl stearate 0.001 - 10% by weight. To achieve the higher concentrations in these ranges, we have found addition of colloidal particulates to provide acceptable storage stability, for example colloidal particulate silica or aluminum oxide at 0.5 - 2.5% by weight. In an aqueous glyphosate formulation that includes a C 16 . 18 alkylether surfactant but no butyl stearate, glyphosate concentration can suitably be increased to 500 g a.e./l or more, in the presence of a colloidal particulate at 0.5 - 2.5% by weight. In solid glyphosate formulations, higher concentrations of ingredients are possible because of the elimination of most of the water. Although various compositions of the present invention are described herein as comprising certain listed materials, in some preferred embodiments of the invention the compositions consist essentially of the indicated materials. Optionally, other agriculturally acceptable materials can be included in the compositions. For example, more than one exogenous chemical can be included. Also, various agriculturally acceptable adjuvants can be included, whether or not their purpose is to directly contribute to the effect of the exogenous chemical on a plant. For example, when the exogenous chemical is a herbicide, liquid nitrogen fertilizer or ammonium sulfate might be included in the composition. As another example, stabilizers can be added to the composition. In some instances it might be desirable to include microencapsulated acid in the composition, to lower the pH of a spray solution on contact with a leaf. One or more surfactants can also be included. Surfactants mentioned here by trade name, and other surfactants that can be useful in the method of the invention, are indexed in standard reference works such as McCutcheon ' s Emulsifiers and Detergents, 1997 edition, Handbook of Industrial Surfactants, 2nd Edition, 1997, published by Gower, and International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary, 6th Edition, 1995. The compositions of the present invention can be applied to plants by spraying, using any conventional means for spraying liquids, such as spray nozzles, atomizers, or the like. Compositions of the present invention can be used in precision farming techniques, in which apparatus is employed to vary the amount of exogenous chemical applied to different parts of a field, depending on variables such as the particular plant species present, soil composition, and the like. In one embodiment of such techniques, a global positioning system operated with the spraying apparatus can be used to apply the desired amount of the composition to different parts of a field. The composition at the time of application to plants is preferably dilute enough to be readily sprayed using standard agricultural spray equipment. Preferred application rates for the present invention vary depending upon a number of factors, including the type and concentration of active ingredient and the plant species involved. Useful rates for applying an aqueous composition to a field of foliage can range from about 25 to about 1,000 liters per hectare (1/ha) by spray application. The preferred application rates for aqueous solutions are in the range from about 50 to about 300 1/ha. Many exogenous chemicals (including glyphosate herbicide) must be taken up by living tissues of the plant and translocated within the plant in order to produce the desired biological (e.g., herbicidal) effect. Thus, it is important that a herbicidal composition not be applied in such a manner as to excessively injure and interrupt the normal functioning of the local tissue of the plant so quickly that translocation is reduced. However, some limited degree of local injury can be insignificant, or even beneficial, in its impact on the biological effectiveness of certain exogenous chemicals. A large number of compositions of the invention are illustrated in the Examples that follow. Many concentrate compositions of glyphosate have provided sufficient herbicidal effectiveness in greenhouse tests to warrant field testing on a wide variety of weed species under a variety of application conditions. Aqueous compositions tested in the field containing colloidal particulates have included: Aerosil blend 2: Aerosil MOX-80 + Aerosil 380 (1 :2) The above compositions were prepared as described in the Examples. Dry compositions tested in the field have included: The above compositions were prepared by the process described for dry granular compositions in Example 27. EXAMPLES In the following Examples illustrative of the invention, greenhouse tests were conducted to evaluate relative herbicidal effectiveness of glyphosate compositions. Compositions included for comparative purposes included the following: Formulation B: which consists of 41% by weight of glyphosate IPA salt in aqueous solution. This formulation is sold in the USA by Monsanto Company under the ACCORD® trademark. Formulation C: which consists of 41% by weight of glyphosate IPA salt in aqueous solution with a coformulant (15% by weight) of a surfactant (MON 0818 of Monsanto Company) based on polyoxyethylene (15) tallowamine. This formulation is sold in Canada by Monsanto Company under the ROUNDUP® trademark. Formulation J: which consists of 41% by weight of glyphosate IPA salt in aqueous solution, together with surfactant. This formulation is sold in the USA by Monsanto Company under the ROUNDUP® ULTRA trademark. Formulation K: which consists of 75% by weight of glyphosate ammonium salt together with surfactant, as a water-soluble dry granular formulation. This formulation is sold in Australia by Monsanto Company under the ROUNDUP® DRY trademark. Formulations B, C and J contain 356 grams of glyphosate acid equivalent per liter (g a.e./l). Formulation K contains 680 grams of glyphosate acid equivalent per kilogram (g a.e./kg). Various proprietary excipients were used in compositions of the Examples. They may be identified as follows: Fluorad FC-135, though defined only generically as above in 3M product literature and in standard directories, has been specifically identified as C 8 F 17 S0 2 NH(CH 2 ) 3 N + (CH 3 ) 3 1 " in a paper by J. Linert & J. N. Chasman of 3M, titled "The effects of fluorochemical surfactants on recoatability" in the December 20, 1993 issue of American Paint & Coatings Journal, and reprinted as a trade brochure by 3M. Fluorad FC-750 is believed to be based on the same surfactant. Fluorad FC-754 is believed to have the structure C 8 F 17 S0 2 NH(CH 2 ) 3 N + (CH 3 )3 Cl ¬ that is, identical to Fluorad FC-135 but with a chloride anion replacing iodide. Fatty alcohol ethoxylate surfactants are referred to in the Examples by their generic names as given in the International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary, 6th Edition, 1995 (Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association, Washington, DC). They were interchangeably sourced from various manufacturers, for example: Laureth-23: Brij 35 (ICI), Trycol 5964 (Henkel). Ceteth-10: Brij 56 (ICI). Ceteth-20: Brij 58 (ICI). Steareth-10: Brij 76 (ICI). Steareth-20: Brij 78 (ICI), Emthox 5888-A (Henkel), STA-20 (Heterene). Steareth-30: STA-30 (Heterene). Steareth-100: Brij 700 (ICI). Ceteareth- 15: CS-15 (Heterene). Ceteareth-20: CS-20 (Heterene). Ceteareth-27: Plurafac A-38 (BASF). Ceteareth-55: Plurafac A-39 (BASF). Oleth-2: Brij 92 (ICI). Oleth-10: Brij 97 (ICI). Oleth-20: Brij 98 (ICI), Trycol 5971 (Henkel). Where a proprietary excipient is a surfactant supplied as a solution in water or other solvent, the amount to be used was calculated on a true surfactant basis, not an "as is" basis. For example, Fluorad FC-135 is supplied as 50% true surfactant, together with 33% isopropanol and 17% water; thus to provide a composition containing 0.1% w/w Fluorad FC- 135 as reported herein, 0.2 g of the product as supplied was included in 100 g of the composition. The amount of lecithin, however, is always reported herein on an "as is" basis, regardless of the content of phospholipid in the lecithin sample used. Spray compositions of the Examples contained an exogenous chemical, such as glyphosate IPA salt, in addition to the excipient ingredients listed. The amount of exogenous chemical was selected to provide the desired rate in grams per hectare (g/ha) when applied in a spray volume of 93 1/ha. Several exogenous chemical rates were applied for each composition. Thus, except where otherwise indicated, when spray compositions were tested, the concentration of exogenous chemical varied in direct proportion to exogenous chemical rate, but the concentration of excipient ingredients was held constant across different exogenous chemical rates. Concentrate compositions were tested by dilution, dissolution or dispersion in water to form spray compositions. In these spray compositions prepared from concentrates, the concentration of excipient ingredients varied with that of exogenous chemical. Many of the Examples feature aqueous concentrate compositions of the invention. Except where otherwise indicated, these aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared by one of the following processes (v) or (vii) to (x). (v) A weighed amount of lecithin powder of the type indicated was placed in a beaker and deionized water was added in sufficient quantity to provide, after sonication as detailed below, a lecithin stock at a convenient concentration, normally in the range from 10% to 20% w/w and typically 15% w/w. The beaker and its contents were then placed in a Fisher Sonic Dismembrator. Model 550, fitted with a 2.4 cm probe tip with the pulse period set at 15 seconds with 1 minute intervals between pulses to allow cooling. Power output was set at level 8. After a total of 3 minutes of sonication (12 pulse periods) the resulting lecithin stock was finally adjusted to the desired concentration if necessary with deionized water. To prepare an aqueous concentrate formulation, the following ingredients were mixed in the appropriate proportions with mild agitation, normally in the order given although this was sometimes varied and was found in some cases to affect the physical stability of the concentrate formulation: (a) exogenous chemical, for example glyphosate IPA salt as a 62% w/w solution at pH 4.4- 4.6; (b) lecithin stock; (c) other ingredients if required; and (d) water. (vii) Oil-in- water (O/W) emulsions were prepared as follows. The required amount of the selected oil and surfactant were mixed thoroughly. If the surfactant selected was not free-flowing at ambient temperature, heat was applied to bring the surfactant into a flowable condition before mixing with the oil. A measured amount of concentrated (62% w/w) aqueous solution of glyphosate IPA salt was added to the surfactant-oil mixture with agitation. The required amount of water was added to bring the concentration of glyphosate and other ingredients to the desired level . The composition was finally subjected to high-shear mixing, typically using a Silverson L4RT-A mixer fitted with a medium emulsor screen, operated for 3 minutes at 7,000 rpm. (viii) Surfactant-containing aqueous solution concentrates having no oil component were prepared as follows. A concentrated (62% w/w) aqueous solution of glyphosate IPA salt was added in the desired amount to a weighed quantity of the selected surfactant(s). If the surfactant selected is not free-flowing at ambient temperature, heat was applied to bring the surfactant into a flowable condition before adding the glyphosate solution. The required amount of water was added to bring the concentration of glyphosate and other ingredients to the desired level. The composition was finally subjected to high-shear mixing, typically using a Silverson L4RT-A mixer fitted with a medium emulsor screen, operated for 3 minutes at 7,000 rpm. (ix) For compositions containing a colloidal particulate, the required amount by weight of the selected colloidal particulate was suspended in a concentrated (62% w/w) aqueous solution of glyphosate IPA salt and agitated with cooling to ensure homogeneity. To the resulting suspension was added the required amount by weight of the selected surfactant(s). For a surfactant which is not free-flowing at ambient temperature, heat was applied to bring the surfactant into a flowable condition before adding it to the suspension. In those instances where an oil, such as butyl stearate, was also to be included in the composition, the oil was first thoroughly mixed with the surfactant and the surfactant-oil mixture added to the suspension. To complete the aqueous concentrate, the required amount of water was added to bring the concentration of glyphosate and other ingredients to the desired level. The concentrate was finally subjected to high-shear mixing, typically using a Silverson L4RT-A mixer fitted with a medium emulsor screen, operated for 3 minutes at 7,000 rpm. (x) The procedure for preparing aqueous concentrate formulations containing lecithin and butyl stearate was different from that followed for other lecithin-containing concentrates. Exogenous chemical, for example glyphosate IPA salt, was first added, with mild agitation, to deionized water in a formulation jar. The selected surfactant (other than lecithin) was then added, while continuing the agitation, to form a preliminary exogenous chemical/ surfactant mixture. Where the surfactant is not free-flowing at ambient temperature, the order of addition was not as above. Instead, the non-free- flowing surfactant was first added to water together with any other surfactant (other than lecithin) required in the composition, and was then heated to 55°C in a shaker bath for 2 hours. The resulting mixture was allowed to cool, then exogenous chemical was added with mild agitation to form the preliminary exogenous chemical/surfactant mixture. A weighed amount of the selected lecithin was added to the preliminary exogenous chemical/surfactant mixture, with stirring to break up lumps. The mixture was left for about 1 hour to allow the lecithin to hydrate, then butyl stearate was added, with further stirring until no phase separation occurred. The mixture was then transferred to a microfiuidizer (Microfluidics International Corporation, Model M-l 10F) and microfluidized for 3 to 5 cycles at 10,000 psi (69 MPa). In each cycle, the formulation jar was rinsed with microfluidized mixture. In the last cycle, the finished composition was collected in a clean dry beaker. The following procedure was used for testing compositions of the Examples to determine herbicidal effectiveness, except where otherwise indicated. Seeds of the plant species indicated were planted in 85 mm square pots in a soil mix which was previously steam sterilized and prefertilized with a 14-14-14 NPK slow release fertilizer at a rate of 3.6 kg/m . The pots were placed in a greenhouse with sub- irrigation. About one week after emergence, seedlings were thinned as needed, including removal of any unhealthy or abnormal plants, to create a uniform series of test pots. The plants were maintained for the duration of the test in the greenhouse where they received a minimum of 14 hours of light per day. If natural light was insufficient to achieve the daily requirement, artificial light with an intensity of approximately 475 microeinsteins was used to make up the difference. Exposure temperatures were not precisely controlled but averaged about 27°C during the day and about 18°C during the night. Plants were sub-irrigated throughout the test to ensure adequate soil moisture levels. Pots were assigned to different treatments in a fully randomized experimental design with 3 replications. A set of pots was left untreated as a reference against which effects of the treatments could later be evaluated. Application of glyphosate compositions was made by spraying with a track sprayer fitted with a 9501E nozzle calibrated to deliver a spray volume of 93 liters per hectare (1/ha) at a pressure of 166 kilopascals (kPa). After treatment, pots were returned to the greenhouse until ready for evaluation. Treatments were made using dilute aqueous compositions. These could be prepared as spray compositions directly from their ingredients, or by dilution with water of preform ulated concentrate compositions. For evaluation of herbicidal effectiveness, all plants in the test were examined by a single practiced technician, who recorded percent inhibition, a visual measurement of the effectiveness of each treatment by comparison with untreated plants. Inhibition of 0% indicates no effect, and inhibition of 100% indicates that all of the plants are completely dead. Inhibition of 85% or more is in most cases considered acceptable for normal herbicidal use; however in greenhouse tests such as those of the Examples it is normal to apply compositions at rates which give less than 85% inhibition, as this makes it easier to discriminate among compositions having different levels of effectiveness. EXAMPLE 1 Glyphosate-containing spray compositions were prepared by tank-mixing Formulation B with excipients as shown in Table 1. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH and 17 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 1. Table 1 In this test, both Aerosil 90 and Aerosil 380 strongly enhanced the herbicidal effectiveness of glyphosate on ABUTH, even at very low concentrations in the spray solution. On ECHCF, Aerosil 90 gave greater enhancement than Aerosil 380 at low concentrations, but both were strongly antagonistic at high concentrations. EXAMPLE 2 Glyphosate-containing spray compositions were prepared by tank-mixing Formulation B with excipients as shown in Table 2. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 21 days after planting ABUTH and 23 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 2. Table 2 In this test, all colloidal particulate additives, at least within some range of concentrations, enhanced the herbicidal effectiveness of glyphosate on ABUTH and ECHCF. Titanium dioxide P25 gave less enhancement than other particulates and was antagonistic to glyphosate on ECHCF at the higher concentrations. EXAMPLE 3 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 3a. Table 3a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH and 17 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 23 days after application. Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 3b. Table 3b None of the concentrate compositions of this Example containing Aerosil 90 showed herbicidal effectiveness equal to the standard Formulations C and J. It should be noted that Emphos PS-21A, present in most of the compositions of this Example, is an anionic surfactant, a class of agents known to be ineffective in enhancing glyphosate effectiveness and in some species to be antagonistic to glyphosate effectiveness. EXAMPLE 4 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 4a. Process (viii) was followed for compositions 4-01, 4-03, 4-06, 4-07, 4- 10, 4-14, 4-15, 4- 18 and 4-19 and process (ix) for compositions 4-02, 4-08, 4-09, 4-16 and 4-17 which contain a colloidal particulate together with surfactant. Compositions 4-04, 4-05, 4-12 and 4-13 contain colloidal particulate but no surfactant. The pH of all compositions was approximately 5. Table 4a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 18 days after planting ABUTH and 20 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 25 days after application. Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 4b. Table 4b In this test, aluminum oxide C gave slight further enhancement of glyphosate herbicidal effectiveness in the presence of surfactant, by comparison with surfactant alone. Titanium dioxide P25 was generally less effective in this regard. EXAMPLE 5 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 5a. Table 5a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 20 days after planting ABUTH and 22 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 22 days after application. Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 5b. Table 5b Several of the concentrate compositions ofthis Example showed surprisingly good herbicidal effectiveness, especially when it is considered that they contain only 3% w/w surfactant, by comparison, for example, with 15% w/w surfactant in the case of Formulation C. EXAMPLE 6 Aqueous concentrate adjuvant compositions were prepared containing excipient ingredients as shown in Table 6a. The compositions were prepared by mixing the selected colloidal particulate in the selected surfactant with sufficient shear to ensure homogeneity. Table 6a Glyphosate-containing spray compositions were prepared by tank-mixing Formulation B with the adjuvant compositions of Table 6a. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 20 days after planting ABUTH and 22 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application. Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 6b. Table 6b The adjuvant compositions of this Example strongly enhanced glyphosate herbicidal effectiveness on ABUTH. Adjuvant compositions 6-04 to 6-07 were antagonistic to glyphosate herbicidal effectiveness on ECHCF. EXAMPLE 7 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 7a. Table 7a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 20 days after planting ABUTH and 22 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 16 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 7b. Table 7b Several compositions ofthis Example exhibited herbicidal effectiveness equal to that of Formulation J on ABUTH and some were superior to Formulation J on ECHCF. Particularly notable was the performance of composition 7-04. This Example illustrates the utility of the present invention in enabling storage-stable aqueous concentrate formulations of glyphosate to be prepared with exceptionally high loading of the active ingredient (40% w/w glyphosate a.e.) yet giving performance equal to a current commercial standard, Formulation J, which has a glyphosate a.e. loading of only about 30% w/w. EXAMPLE 8 Glyphosate-containing spray compositions were prepared by tank-mixing Formulation B with excipients as shown in Table 8. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 20 days after planting ABUTH and 23 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 8. Table 8 No strong enhancement of glyphosate herbicidal effectiveness on ABUTH was seen with the colloidal particulates ofthis Example, but some colloidal particulates gave enhancement at extremely low concentrations. Aerosil OX-50 gave the best result in this test. EXAMPLE 9 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 9a. Table 9a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 15 days after planting ABUTH and 16 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 9b. Table 9b None of the compositions ofthis Example equalled the performance of commercial standard Formulation J. The surfactants used are not optimal for enhancement of glyphosate activity. EXAMPLE 10 An aqueous concentrate adjuvant composition was prepared containing excipient ingredients as shown in Table 10a. The composition was prepared by mixing the selected colloidal particulate in the selected surfactant with sufficient shear to ensure homogeneity. Table 10a Glyphosate-containing spray compositions were prepared by tank-mixing Formulation B with the adjuvant composition of Table 10a. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 18 days after planting ABUTH and 20 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 25 days after application. Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 10b. Table 10b Composition 10-01 is a highly efficacious adjuvant for glyphosate. Tank-mix addition of 10-01 at the very low concentration of 0.125% to Formulation B provided herbicidal effectiveness greater than obtained with commercial standard Formulations C and J. EXAMPLE 11 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 11a. Table 11a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 15 days after planting ABUTH and 17 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. All compositions of Table 1 la with the exception of 1 1-21 were tested. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table l ib. Table lib Good herbicidal effectiveness was obtained with several compositions ofthis Example but none equalled the performance of Formulations C or J in this study. EXAMPLE 12 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 12a. Table 12a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 18 days after planting ABUTH and 20 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 12b. Table 12b Compositions ofthis Example, containing the anionic surfactant Emphos CS-141, exhibited relatively weak herbicidal effectiveness in this study. EXAMPLE 13 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 13a. Table 13a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and 18 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Compositions 13-02 to 13-17 were not included in the test. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 13b. Table 13b Again glyphosate compositions containing a range of anionic surfactants, in combination with colloidal particulate, failed to give herbicidal effectiveness equal to commercial standard Formulation J. EXAMPLE 14 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 14a. Table 14a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and 18 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 14b. Table 14b Certain compositions ofthis Example exhibited glyphosate herbicidal effectiveness on ECHCF superior to that obtained with Formulation J. Compositions containing Tween 20 or Tween 80 as surfactant generally outperformed those containing Tween 85. EXAMPLE 15 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 15a. Table 15a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH and 16 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 15b. Table 15b Compositions ofthis Example exhibited relatively weak herbicidal effectiveness by comparison with Formulation J. EXAMPLE 16 Aqueous concentrate adjuvant compositions were prepared containing excipient ingredients as shown in Table 16a. The compositions were prepared by mixing the selected colloidal particulate in the selected surfactant with sufficient shear to ensure homogeneity. Table 16a Glyphosate-containing spray compositions were prepared by tank-mixing Formulation B with the adjuvant compositions of Table 16a. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and 17 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 16b. Table 16b Compositions 16-01 to 16-14 were effective adjuvants for glyphosate Formulation B in this study. EXAMPLE 17 Storage stable dry granular concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 17a. The preparation procedure was as follows. Ammonium glyphosate powder was added to a blender. Excipient ingredients were slowly added, together with sufficient water to wet the powder and form a stiff dough. The blender was operated for sufficient time to thoroughly mix all ingredients. The dough was then transferred to extrusion apparatus and was extruded to form granules, which were finally dried in a fluid bed dryer. Table 17a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 15 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application. Formulations B, J and K were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 17b. Table 17b Composition 17-01 exhibited herbicidal effectiveness comparable to that of commercial Formulations J and K. Composition 17-02 was considerably more herbicidally effective than the commercial formulations on ABUTH though less so on ECHCF in this test. EXAMPLE 18 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 18a. Table 18a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 15 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 18b. Table 18b Several compositions ofthis Example exhibited glyphosate herbicidal effectiveness on ECHCF superior to that of Formulation J. EXAMPLE 19 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 19a. Table 19a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 16 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 19b. Table 19b Concentrate compositions of glyphosate containing colloidal particulates but no surfactant did not show significant enhancement over Formulation B in this test. EXAMPLE 20 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 20a. Table 20a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 17 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 20b. Table 20b The inclusion of colloidal aluminum oxide in a glyphosate composition containing Ethomeen T/25 appeared to reduce herbicidal effectiveness in this study (compare 20-02 and 20-03). EXAMPLE 21 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 21a. All contain colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). All compositions ofthis example showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions containing oleth-20 were not acceptably storage-stable in the absence of the colloidal particulate. Table 21a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Compositions 21-01 to 21-12 were not included in the test. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 21b. Table 21b Remarkably high levels of herbicidal effectiveness were obtained in this test with compositions containing oleth-20 at a weight/weight ratio to glyphosate a.e. of about 1 : 14, and stabilized with colloidal particulates. In some cases the colloidal particulate alone contributed a major part of the efficacy enhancement. Results with composition 21-21 are out of line with other data and an application problem is suspected. EXAMPLE 22 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 22a. Concentrate compositions 22-13 and 22-14 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 22-01 to 22-12 and 22-15 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Concentrate compositions 22-16 and 22-17 contained colloidal particulates but no surfactant. Where a blend of two different colloidal particulates was used, these were included at a 1 :1 weight ratio. In the absence of colloidal particulate, it was not possible to make a storage stable aqueous concentrate having a glyphosate loading of 480 g a.e./l or higher in the presence of 3% w/w oleth-20. In order to test comparative herbicidal efficacy with and without colloidal particulate, two compositions (22-01 and 22-02) were made at a much lower glyphosate loading with no colloidal particulate and a similar glyphosate/oleth-20 ratio to the other compositions ofthis Example. No difference between compositions 22-01 and 22-02 are recorded. Compositions 22-13 and 22-14 (both containing 162 g a.e./l glyphosate) showed acceptable storage stability. However, at glyphosate loadings >480 g a.e./l (as in compositions 22-01 to 22-12 and 22-15) storage-stable compositions containing 3% oleth-20 could not be made except with the addition of colloidal particulate as shown below. Table 22a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 22b. Table 22b Several high-loaded (492 g a.e./l) glyphosate compositions containing oleth-20 at just 3% exhibited surprisingly high herbicidal effectiveness, approaching or equalling that of commercial standard Formulation J, which is loaded at only about 360 g a.e./l and has a much higher surfactant to glyphosate ratio. Especially effective compositions included 22-07 to 22-10. EXAMPLE 23 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 23a. Concentrate composition 23-08 to 23-14 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 23- 15 to 23-17 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 23-01 to 23-07 contain colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Compositions 23-08 to 23-17 (all containing 163 g a.e./l glyphosate) showed acceptable storage stability. However, at a glyphosate loading of 400 g a.e./l (as in compositions 23-01 to 23-07) storage- stable compositions containing 0.5-1% butyl stearate and 5-10% alkylether surfactant could not be made except with the addition of colloidal particulate as shown below. Table 23a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 18 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 23b. Table 23b Outstanding herbicidal effectiveness was provided by compositions containing Cι 6 .| 8 alkylether surfactants (ceteareth-27, steareth-20, steareth-30, oleth-20, ceteth-20). High-loaded (400 g a.e./l) glyphosate compositions containing a C, 6 . 18 alkylether surfactant, butyl stearate and a colloidal particulate (Aerosil 90) to stabilize the compositions performed especially impressively in this test. EXAMPLE 24 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 24a. Concentrate compositions 24-01 to 24-12 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Concentrate compositions 24-13 to 24-18 contained colloidal particulates but no surfactant. The colloidal particulates of this example were in general too large to confer good storage stability to the compositions tested. Table 24a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 21 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 14 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 24b. Table 24b Many of the high-load (488 g a.e./l) glyphosate formulations ofthis Example exhibited herbicidal effectiveness equal to or greater than that obtained with commercial standard Formulation J, in spite of containing only 3% alkylether surfactant. EXAMPLE 25 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 25a. Concentrate compositions 25-01 to 25-04, 25-06, 25-08, 25-10 and 25-18 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 25-05, 25-07 and 25-09 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 25-1 1 to 25-17 contain colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). The compositions ofthis example all showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions shown as containing colloidal particulate were not storage-stable unless the colloidal particulate was included as shown. Table 25a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 22 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 25b. Table 25b Compositions exhibiting herbicidal effectiveness greater than that provided by commercial standard Formulation J included 25-01 (steareth-20 plus butyl stearate), 25-09 (ceteareth- 15) and 25-10 (steareth-20 plus butyl stearate). When loading was increased by addition of colloidal particulate, performance in this test tended to be reduced (compare 25-01 with 25-15 and 25-10 with 25-14). EXAMPLE 26 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 26a. All are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). The compositions of this example all showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions shown as containing colloidal particulate were not storage-stable unless the colloidal particulate was included as shown. Table 26a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 21 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 26b. Results for the 400 g a.e./ha glyphosate rate were erratic in this test and should be disregarded. Table 26b Several high-load (488 g a.e./l) glyphosate compositions exhibited herbicidal effectiveness on ABUTH equal to commercial standard Formulation J, but none was equal to Formulation J on ECHCF in this test. EXAMPLE 27 Storage stable dry granular concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 27a. The following procedure was used to prepare the compositions. Ammonium glyphosate powder was added to a blender. Excipient ingredients were slowly added, together with sufficient water to wet the powder and form a stiff dough. The blender was operated for sufficient time to thoroughly mix all ingredients. The dough was then transferred to extrusion apparatus and was extruded to form granules, which were finally dried in a fluid bed dryer. Lecithin for compositions 27-05 and 27-06 was soybean lecithin containing 45% phospholipid, from Avanti. Table 27a (*) Aerosil MOX-80 + Aerosil MOX- 170 (1 :1) Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 21 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application. Formulations J and K were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 27b. Table 27b Several dry granular compositions of this Example outperformed commercial standard composition K, at least on ABUTH. They included 27-1 1 to 27-16, all containing an alkylether surfactant (steareth-20, oleth-20 or ceteth-20) and colloidal particulate. EXAMPLE 28 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 28a. Concentrate compositions 28-04 and 28-05 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 28-06 to 28-13 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Concentrate compositions 28-01 to 28-03 contain colloidal particulate but no surfactant. The compositions of this example containing colloidal particulate all showed acceptable storage stability. Of those containing steareth-20 but no colloidal particulate, composition 28-04 was acceptable storage-stable but composition 28-05 was not. Table 28a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 20 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 28b. Table 28b Remarkably strong herbicidal effectiveness was provided by composition 28-05, in spite of its very low surfactant (steareth-20) to glyphosate a.e. ratio of about 1 : 13. Activity, at least on ABUTH, was further improved to a significant degree by inclusion in the composition of colloidal particulates such as Aerosil MOX- 170 (28-06), Aerosil 380 (28-07), a blend of Aerosil MOX-80 and Aerosil 380 (28-08), and a blend of Aerosil MOX-80 and Aerosil MOX- 170 (28-09). EXAMPLE 29 Aqueous and dry granular concentrate compositions were prepared as shown in Table 29a. Dry granular concentrate compositions 29-01 to 29-1 1 contain glyphosate ammonium salt, and were prepared by the process described in Example 27. Aqueous concentrate compositions 29-12 to 29-16 contain glyphosate IPA salt and were prepared by process (v), using soybean lecithin (45% phospholipid, Avanti). Table 29a Aerosil blend: Aerosil MOX-80 + Aerosil MOX- 170 (1 : 1) Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 20 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 16 days after application. Formulations J and K were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 29b. Table 29b All dry compositions of the invention in this study exhibited greater herbicidal effectiveness on both ABUTH and ECHCF, in some cases by a very substantial margin, than commercial standard Formulation K. EXAMPLE 30 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 30a. All contain colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). The compositions ofthis example all showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions shown as containing colloidal particulate were not storage-stable unless the colloidal particulate was included as shown. Table 30a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABLITH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 30b. Table 30b Percent inhibition data for the 400 g a.e./ha glyphosate rate in this test are unreliable and should be ignored. In presence of colloidal particulate, neither oleth-20 (composition 30-05) nor steareth-20 (30-10) provided herbicidal effectiveness equal to Formulation J in this study, and no great or consistent further enhancement was obtained by adding butyl stearate. EXAMPLE 31 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 31 a. The process for preparing these aqueous concentrate compositions was generally as described above except that different mixing methods were used as the final step of the process as shown in the footnote to Table 31a. The compositions ofthis example all showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions shown as containing colloidal particulate were not storage-stable unless the colloidal particulate was included as shown. Table 31a (*) Process: A Silverson mixer, medium screen, 3 minutes at 7000 rpm B Silverson mixer, coarse screen, 3 minutes at 7000 rpm C Fann mixer, 50% output, 5 minutes D Turrax mixer, 3 minutes at 8000 rpm E Overhead stirrer, low speed F Overhead stirrer, high speed G Hand shaking, 3 minutes Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 31b. Table 31b Results obtained with composition 31 -06 are out of line with other data in this Example and an error in formulation or application is suspected. Some differences in herbicidal effectiveness were evident when a composition containing 360 g a.e./l glyphosate, 1% butyl stearate, 10% oleth-20 and 1.25% Aerosil 380 was processed in different ways (31-1 1 to 31-17). However, as compositions 31-07 and 31-1 1 were identically processed yet differed in effectiveness, no firm conclusions can be drawn from this test. EXAMPLE 32 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 32a. Concentrate compositions 32-01 to 104-09 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 32-10 to 32-18 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Compositions ofthis example containing 3% or 6% surfactant were not acceptably storage-stable except in the presence of colloidal particulate as shown. Table 32a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 18 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 32b. Table 32b In high-load (488 g a.e./l) glyphosate compositions, steareth-20 at 3% or 6% provided greater herbicidal effectiveness in this test than the same concentrations of oleth-20. Even at just 3%, steareth- 20 (composition 32-02) gave effectiveness equal to commercial standard Formulation J. Addition of a blend of colloidal particulates to stabilize the composition (32-1 1) slightly reduced effectiveness in this study. EXAMPLE 33 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 33a. Concentrate compositions 33-01 to 33-04 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 33-08 to 33-18 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Concentrate compositions 33-05 to 33-07 contain colloidal particulate but no surfactant. All compositions ofthis example except 33-01 to 33-03 were acceptably storage-stable. Table 33a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 21 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 33b. Table 33b Among stabilized high-load (488 g a.e./l) glyphosate compositions providing herbicidal effectiveness superior to commercial standard Formulation J, at least on ABUTH, were 33-10 and 33-11 (respectively 4.5% and 6% steareth-20 + 3% MON 0818 + 1.5% Aerosil 380), 33-13 (4.5% steareth-20 + 3% MON 0818 + 1.5% Aerosil MOX-80/MOX-170 blend) and 33-16 (4.5% steareth-20 + 3% MON 0818 + 1.5% Aerosil MOX-80/380 blend). The relatively poor performance of composition 33-04 and the good performance of composition 33-02 shows that the excellent results obtained with the stabilized compositions listed above are primarily attributable to the steareth-20 component. EXAMPLE 34 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 34a. Concentrate compositions 34-01 to 34-09 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 34-10 to 34-18 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Compositions of this example containing 3% or 6% surfactant were not acceptably storage-stable except in the presence of colloidal particulate as shown. Table 34a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 15 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 22 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 34b. Table 34b Compositions containing steareth-20 generally performed better than counterparts containing oleth-20 in this study, both in the presence and in the absence of colloidal particulates. EXAMPLE 35 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 35a. All contain colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). The compositions ofthis example all showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions shown as containing colloidal particulate were not storage-stable unless the colloidal particulate was included as shown. Table 35a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 22 days after application. The treatments ofthis Example were applied at four different times within the same day. Formulation J was applied as a comparative treatment. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 35b. Table 35b Composition 35-03 illustrates the consistency of high-level performance obtainable with, in this case, steareth-30 at an approximately 1 :3 weight/weight ratio to glyphosate a.e., together with a small amount of butyl stearate and Aerosil 380. An average of percent inhibition of ABUTH across all four glyphosate rates shows the following comparison of 35-03 with Formulation J, applied at four different hours of the day: Hour Formulation J Composition 35-03 1000 48 59 1200 45 58 1400 48 62 1600 42 65 EXAMPLE 36 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 36a. Concentrate compositions 36-01 to 36-07 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 36-08 to 36-18 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Compositions 36-01 to 36-06 were not acceptably storage-stable. All other compositions showed acceptable storage stability. Table 36a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 23 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 36b. Table 36b Several stabilized high-load (488 g a.e./l) glyphosate compositions ofthis Example provided herbicidal effectiveness equal or superior, at least on ABUTH, to that obtained with commercial standard Formulation J. EXAMPLE 37 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 37a. Concentrate compositions 37-12 to 37-14 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Table 37a Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application. Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 37b. Table 37b Several stabilized high-load (488 g a.e./l) glyphosate compositions ofthis Example provided herbicidal effectiveness equal or superior, at least on ABUTH, to that obtained with commercial standard Formulation J. The preceding description of specific embodiments of the present invention is not intended to be a complete list of every possible embodiment of the invention. Persons skilled in this field will recognize that modifications can be made to the specific embodiments described here that would be within the scope of the present invention.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A plant treatment composition comprising (a) a water-soluble exogenous chemical, (b) an adjuvant amount of a solid particulate colloidal material and (c) zero to an amount S of a surfactant wherein S is equal to one-tenth of the amount of the exogenous chemical present in the composition. 2. The composition of claim 1 further comprising water in an amount sufficient to provide a sprayable composition wherein the exogenous chemical is present in a concentration from about 0.001% to about 0.5% by weight of the composition. 3. The composition of claim 2 wherein the colloidal material is present at a concentration from about 0.01 % to about 0.5% by weight of the composition. 4. The composition of claim 1 further comprising water in an amount sufficient to provide an aqueous concentrate composition wherein the exogenous chemical is present at a concentration from about 10% to about 60% by weight of the composition. 5. The composition of claim 4 wherein the colloidal material is present at a concentration from about 0.01 % to about 5% by weight of the composition. 6. The composition of claim 1 which is a solid water-dispersible concentrate composition wherein the exogenous chemical is present at a concentration from about 10% to about 90% of the composition. 7. The composition of claim 6 wherein the colloidal material is present at a concentration from about 0.01% to about 10% by weight of the composition. 8. The composition of claim 1 wherein the colloidal material has a specific surface area from about 50 to about 400 m 2 /g. 9. The composition of claim 1 wherein the colloidal material comprises particulates selected from the group consisting of silicon oxides, aluminum oxides, titanium oxides, and mixtures thereof. 10. The composition of claim 1 wherein the exogenous chemical is a foliar-applied exogenous chemical. 11. The composition of claim 10 wherein the exogenous chemical is a pesticide, gametocide or plant growth regulator. 12. The composition of claim 11 wherein the exogenous chemical is a herbicide, nematicide or plant growth regulator. 13. The composition of claim 12 wherein the exogenous chemical is a herbicide. 14. The composition of claim 13 wherein the herbicide is selected from the group consisting of bipyridyls, diphenylethers, fatty acids, imidazolinones and phenoxies. 15. The composition of claim 13 wherein the herbicide is selected from the group consisting of aminotriazole. asulam, bentazon, bialaphos, diquat, paraquat, dicamba, acifluorfen, C 9-10 fatty acids, fosamine, glufosinate, glyphosate, imazaquin, imazethapyr, 2,4-D, picloram, triclopyr and herbicidal derivatives thereof. 16. The composition of claim 15 wherein the herbicide is glyphosate or a herbicidal derivative thereof. 17. The composition of claim 16 wherein the herbicide is glyphosate in its acid form. 18. The composition of claim 12 wherein the exogenous chemical is a salt having an anion portion and a cation portion. 19. The composition of claim 18 wherein at least one of said anion and cation portions is biologically active and has a molecular weight of less than about 300. 20. The composition of claim 19 wherein the exogenous chemical is paraquat or diquat. 21. The composition of claim 19 wherein the exogenous chemical exhibits systemic biological activity in the plant. 22. The composition of claim 21 wherein the exogenous chemical has one or more functional groups selected from the group consisting of amine, amide, carboxylate, phosphonate and phosphinate groups. 23. The composition of claim 22 wherein the exogenous chemical is a salt of 3,4,4-trifluoro-3- butenoic acid or of N-(3,4,4-trifluoro- l-oxo-3-butenyl)g!ycine that exhibits nematicidal activity. 24. The composition of claim 22 wherein the exogenous chemical is a herbicidal or plant growth regulating compound having at least one of each of amine, carboxylate and either phosphonate or phosphinate functional groups. 25. The composition of claim 24 wherein the herbicidal or plant growth regulating compound is a salt of glufosinate. 26. The composition of claim 25 wherein the salt of glufosinate is the ammonium salt. 27. The composition of claim 24 wherein the herbicidal or plant growth regulating compound is a salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine. 28. The composition of claim 27 wherein the salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine is selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium, ammonium, mono-, di-, tri- and tetra-C 1 . 4 -alkylammonium, mono-, di- and tri-C^-alkanolammonium, mono-, di- and tri-Cι. 4 -alkylsulfonium and sulfoxonium salts. 29. The composition of claim 28 wherein the salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine is the ammonium, monoisopropylammonium or trimethylsulfonium salt. 30. An aqueous concentrate plant treatment composition comprising (a) a water-soluble exogenous chemical, (b) an aqueous diluent, (c) a surfactant component comprising one or more nonionic surfactant(s), and (d) an amount of a solid inorganic particulate colloidal material effective to stabilize the composition, said composition not exhibiting phase separation over a period of time T under storage conditions involving storage in a closed container at a temperature in the range from about 15°C to about 30°C; T being in the range from about 1 hour to about 60 days; wherein the exogenous chemical and the surfactant are present at concentrations in the absolute or relative to each other such that, in the absence of the colloidal material, phase separation would occur under the same storage conditions during said period of time T. 31. The composition of claim 30 wherein the solid inorganic particulates are selected from the group consisting of silicon oxides, aluminum oxides, titanium oxides, and mixtures thereof. 32. The composition of claim 30 wherein the particulate colloidal material has an average specific surface area of about 50 to about 400 m Ig. 33. The composition of claim 30 wherein the particulate colloidal material has an average specific surface area of about 180 to about 400 m Ig. 34. The composition of claim 30 wherein the particulate colloidal material has a bimodal distribution of specific surface area whereby a first component of the colloidal material has an average specific surface area of about 50 to about 150 m /g and a second component of the colloidal material has an average specific surface area of about 180 to about 400 m Ig. 35. The composition of claim 30 wherein the particulate colloidal material is present at a concentration between about 0.01% and about 5% by weight of the composition. 36. The composition of claim 30 wherein the surfactant component comprises one or more surfactants having the having the formula R 12 -0-(CH 2 CH 2 0) n (CH(CH 3 )CH 2 0) m -R' 3 11 wherein R is an alkyl or alkenyl group having about 16 to about 22 carbon atoms, n is an average number of about 10 to about 100, m is an average number of 0 to about 5, and R 13 is hydrogen or Cμ alkyl. 37. The composition of claim 36, wherein R is a saturated straight-chain alkyl group, n is from about 20 to about 40, m is 0 and R is hydrogen. 38. The composition of claim 36, wherein the surfactant component is a cetyl or stearyl ether or mixture thereof. 39. The composition of claim 30 wherein the exogenous chemical is a foliar-applied exogenous chemical. 40. The composition of claim 39 wherein the exogenous chemical is a pesticide, gametocide or plant growth regulator. 41. The composition of claim 40 wherein the exogenous chemical is a herbicide, nematicide or plant growth regulator. 42. The composition of claim 41 wherein the exogenous chemical is a herbicide. 43. The composition of claim 42 wherein the herbicide is selected from the group consisting of bipyridyls, diphenylethers, fatty acids, imidazolinones, and phenoxies. 44. The composition of claim 42 wherein the herbicide is selected from the group consisting of aminotriazole, asulam, bentazon, bialaphos, diquat, paraquat, dicamba, acifluorfen, C 9- ι 0 fatty acids, fosamine, glufosinate, glyphosate, imazaquin, imazethapyr, 2,4-D, picloram, triclopyr and herbicidal derivatives thereof. 45. The composition of claim 44 wherein the herbicide is glyphosate or a herbicidal derivative thereof. 46. The composition of claim 45 wherein the herbicide is glyphosate in its acid form. 47. The composition of claim 46 wherein the exogenous chemical is a salt having an anion portion and a cation portion. 48. The composition of claim 47 wherein at least one of said anion and cation portions is biologically active and has a molecular weight of less than about 300. 49. The composition of claim 48 wherein the exogenous chemical is paraquat or diquat. 50. The composition of claim 48 wherein the exogenous chemical exhibits systemic biological activity in the plant. 51. The composition of claim 50 wherein the exogenous chemical has one or more functional groups selected from the group consisting of amine, amide, carboxylate, phosphonate and phosphinate groups. 52. The composition of claim 51 wherein the exogenous chemical is a salt of 3,4,4-trifluoro-3- butenoic acid or of N-(3,4,4-trifluoro-l-oxo-3-butenyl)glycine that exhibits nematicidal activity. 53. The composition of claim 51 wherein the exogenous chemical is a herbicidal or plant growth regulating compound having at least one of each of amine, carboxylate and either phosphonate or phosphinate functional groups. 54. The composition of claim 53 wherein the herbicidal or plant growth regulating compound is a salt of glufosinate. 55. The composition of claim 54 wherein the salt of glufosinate is the ammonium salt. 56. The composition of claim 53 wherein the herbicidal or plant growth regulating compound is a salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine. 57. The composition of claim 56 wherein the salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine is selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium, ammonium, mono-, di-, tri- and tetra-Cι. 4 -alkylammonium, mono-, di- and tri-Ci^-alkanolammonium, mono-, di- and tri-Cι. 4 -alkylsulfonium and sulfoxonium salts. 58. The composition of claim 57 wherein the salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine is the ammonium, monoisopropylammonium or trimethylsulfonium salt. 59. The composition of claim 57 wherein the surfactant component comprises one or more alkylether surfactants having the formula R l2 -0-(CH 2 CH 2 0) n (CH(CH 3 )CH 2 0) m -R 13 wherein R is a straight-chain C| 6-18 alkyl group, n is an average number of about 10 to about 100, m is 0, and R is hydrogen. 60. The composition of claim 59 wherein the salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine is present at an acid equivalent concentration of about 30% by weight or higher. 61. The composition of claim 59 wherein the salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine is present at an acid equivalent concentration of about 40% by weight or higher. 62. The composition of claim 60 that further comprises a compound of formula R 14 -CO-A-R 15 wherein R is a hydrocarbyl group having about 5 to about 21 carbon atoms, R 15 is a hydrocarbyl group having 1 to about 14 carbon atoms, the total number of carbon atoms in R 14 and R l 3 is about 1 1 to about 27, and A is O or NH; said compound being present in the composition at a concentration of about 0.1% to about 5% by weight. 63. The composition of claim 62 wherein said compound is a Cι -4 alkyl ester of a C 12-18 fatty acid. 64. The composition of claim 63 wherein said compound is a propyl, isopropyl or butyl ester of a Cj 2 -i 8 fatty acid. 65. The composition of claim 64 wherein said compound is butyl stearate. 66. A herbicidal composition that comprises: (a) a water soluble salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine, (b) an aqueous diluent, (c) a surfactant component comprising one or more nonionic surfactants having the formula R 12 -0-(CH 2 CH 2 0) n (CH(CH 3 )CH 2 0) m -R 13 12 ■ wherein R is an alkyl or alkenyl group having about 16 to about 22 carbon atoms, n is an average number of about 10 to about 100, m is an average number of 0 to about 5, and R is hydrogen or C ] alkyl, and (d) an amount of a solid inorganic particulate colloidal material effective to stabilize the composition, said composition not exhibiting phase separation over a period of time T under storage conditions involving storage in a closed container at a temperature in the range from about 15°C to about 30°C; T being in the range from about 1 hour to about 60 days; wherein the exogenous chemical and the surfactant are present at concentrations in the absolute or relative to each other such that, in the absence of the colloidal material, phase separation would occur under the same storage conditions during said period of time T. 67. A plant treatment method comprising contacting foliage of a plant with a biologically effective amount of a composition according to any of claims 1 to 3 or 8 to 29.

Inventors: WARD ANTHONY J I, WARNER JAMES M, WARD, ANTHONY, J., I.,, WARNER, JAMES, M.
Applicants: MONSANTO CO, MONSANTO COMPANY
Application year: 1997
Main classification: A01N25
IPC codes: A01N25, A01N35, A01N37, A01N41, A01N43, A01N47, A01N57, G01N33