METHOD OF IDENTIFICATION OF ANIMALS RESISTANT OR SUSCEPTIBLE TO DISEASES SUCH AS RUMINANT BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS, PARATUBERCULOSIS AND SALMONELLOSIS

Abstract: The present invention relates to materials and methods for identifying animals that are resistant or susceptible to diseases associated with intracellular parasites such as brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. More particularly, the present invention relates to the identification of a gene, called NRAMP1, which is associated with the susceptibility or resistance of an animal, such as an artiodactyla to diseases such as brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to the identification of specific sequences of bovine NRAMP1 which associate with resistance or susceptibility to ruminant brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis, and to the method of identifying said sequences to identify animals who are susceptible or resistant to disease.

Description: INVENTION: METHOD OF IDENTIFICATION OF ANIMALS RESISTANT OR SUSCEPTIBLE TO DISEASES SUCH AS RUMIN-ANT BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS, PARATUBERCULOSIS AND SALMONELLOSIS SPECIFICATION: This application is a continuation of, claims priority of, and incorporates by reference in its entirety, U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/903,139 filed 30 July 1997 by Joe W. Templeton, Jianwei Feng, L. Garry Adams, Erwin Schurr, Philippe Gros, Donald S. Davis and Roger Smith and entitled Identification of a Gene Controlling Natural Resistance To Ruminant Brucellosis, Tuberculosis, Paratuberculosis and Salmonellosis. This application also claims priority of, and incorporates by reference in its entirety, U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/031,443 filed September 20, 1996 by Joe W. Templeton, Jianwei Feng, L. Garry Adams, Erwin Schurr, Philippe Gros, Donald S. Davis and Roger Smith and entitled Identification of a Gene Controlling Natural Resistance To Ruminant Brucellosis, Tuberculosis, Paratuberculosis and Salmonellosis. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION: 1. Field Of The Invention: The present invention relates to a method for identifying animals that are resistant or susceptible to diseases associated with intracellular parasites. More particularly, the present invention relates to the identification of a gene, called NRAMPl, associated with the susceptibility or resistance of an animal, such as an artiodactyla, to diseases such as brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to the identification of specific sequences of the 3' untranslated region (3' UTR) of bovine NRAMPl which associate with resistance or susceptibility to bovine brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis, and to the use of the general sequence patterns to identify artiodactyl animals containing those sequences in situ, allowing therefore the identification of animals predicted to be either resistant or susceptible to diseases associated with intracellular parasites. 2. General Background: Intracellular zoonotic bacterial diseases like brucellosis and tuberculosis cause significant losses in livestock industries despite widespread application of antimicrobials, vaccination, isolation and quarantine, test and slaughter, or a combination of these The lack of success in eradicating infectious diseases of animals using these approaches indicates a need for a different strategy, such as the development of a means to identify genetic sequences associated with resistance and/or susceptibility, where such means could allow the identification of animals that are resistant or susceptible to disease This could then allow the treatment, prophylactic or therapeutic, or elimination of susceptible animals, and the use of and/or selective breeding of resistant animals (see, for example, Templeton et al. 1988). Diseases such as ruminant brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis cause an estimated $250,000,000 loss annually to the U S A beef and dairy industry. Further, tuberculosis especially is a health threat to all ungulates including rare and endangered mammals These are diseases for which the usual eradication programs have been long-term, expensive, and somewhat unsuccessful. For example, bovine tuberculosis was thought to be a disease of antiquity in 1970 but has re-emerged as an endemic disease in the El Paso, Texas dairy herds. Outbreaks of bovine tuberculosis have been reported in the past 5 years in California, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Wisconsin, and Virginia (Essey and Roller 1994; and Essey M A 1991). Further, each of these specific diseases are zoonotic diseases which continually threaten the U.S. population. The benefit of cattle naturally resistant to these, and other diseases would be a key component of the preharvest pathogen reduction programs like the National Hazard -Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) program proposed for farm use (Pierson, M D. and Corlett, D. A., 1992; and Vanderzant, C, 1985). Further, it is desired that the approach used to control these diseases use natural resistance since it is environmentally compatible. The only method currently available for the detection of artiodactyla resistant to brucellosis or tuberculosis is by a potent in vivo challenge with virulent Brucella abortus. Salmonella dublm, Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, or Mycobacterium bovis (Templeton and Adams 1996) Unfortunately, for this assay, the tested ungulates have to be euthanized in order to culture for the specific pathogen. Males challenged with B. abortus or M. bovis must be necropsied and cultured to determine if the bacterium has been cleared (resistant) or persists (susceptible). Nonpregnant females challenged with M. bovis must be necropsied and cultured to determine resistance or susceptibility. Although the gametes from both males and females can be stored frozen and used in a breeding-selection program to produce naturally resistant progeny with some success, this is both extremely expensive, and inefficient. The viability of frozen gametes and embryos is variable and a much lower birth rate occurs than with natural matings. Additionally, the breeding-selection program would be based on phenotypic selection (so-called mass selection) which is not as efficient as determining genotypes and selecting resistance associated with genetic sequences directly. (See, for example, Martin et al. 1994; and Dietrich et al. 1986). The present invention solves these prior art problems by providing an efficient and reliable method for determining whether an animal, such as an artiodactyla, is susceptible or resistant to diseases such as brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION: In this invention, we identify homologs of murine NRAMPl from bovine, bison, and other artiodactyla and show that particular sequences of the 3' UTR of these NRAMPl homologs have a highly significant association with resistance or susceptibility to diseases associated with bacterial pathogens. More specifically, this invention relates to the discovery of distinct, naturally occurring sequences of bovine NRAMPl, where the presence of a particular sequence strongly correlates (P=0.0089) with either resistance or susceptibility to, inter alia, brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis in unrelated cattle. The genetic sequences associated with artiodactyla NRAMPl that statistically associate with either susceptibility or resistance involve a transversion at position 1782 of the NRAMPl complementary (c) DNA and a polymorphic DNA microsatellite sequence difference; both of which are located in the 3' UTR. The sequence associated with resistance contains a thymine at position 1782 and a polymorphic microsatellite sequence beginning at position 1785 characterized by: SEQ ID NO. 31 : 5' (GT) 10 AT(GT) 3 (N) 6I (GT) 5 (N) 24 (GT) I3 3' where "N" symbolizes any one of the four nucleotide bases A, C, G or T. In contrast, the sequences associated with susceptibility contain a guanine at position 1782 and a polymorphic DNA microsatellite region characterized by: 5' (GT) 10 AT(GT) 3 (N) >61 (GT) 5 (N) <24 (GT) >I3 3' where "N" again symbolizes any one of the four nucleotide bases A, C, G or T. These sequence differences in the 3' UTR of the NRAMPl gene can be used to detect whether animals are susceptible or resistant to disease. For example, by screening animals for the presence of sequences associated with susceptibility or resistance, one can easily and accurately predict the susceptibility or resistance of an animal to diseases such as brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis, salmonellosis and other diseases associated with infections of macrophages. Once identified, susceptible animals can be segregated, prophylactically or therapeutically treated, or sacrificed. Resistant animals, on the other hand, can be safely handled, used to produce food stuffs, and/or bred to produce disease resistant animals BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS: For a further understanding of the nature and objects of the present invention, reference should be had to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein FIGURE 1 A shows the sequence of PCR primers useful in the detection of bovine NRAMPl sequences associated with susceptibility and resistance to disease (SEQ ID NO 1 and SEQ ID NO 2), FIGURE IB shows the sequences of primers used to clone bovine NRAMPl (SEQ ID NO 3, SEQ ID NO 4, SEQ ID NO 5, and SEQ ID NO 6), FIGURE 2 shows the predicted amino acid sequence of bovine Nrampl (SEQ ID NO. 7), and human (SEQ ID NO 8), and murine (SEQ ID NO 9) Nrampl homologs and their alignment with each other, FIGURE 3 A shows the SSCP analysis of 22 unrelated cattle, phenotypically determined (by in vivo challenge and/or by an in vitro macrophage killing assay) to be either naturally resistant or susceptible to disease, FIGURE 3B shows the tabular results of the experiment performed in FIGURE 3 A, FIGURE 3C shows the SSCP analysis and pedigree of naturally resistant bull sired to a naturally susceptible cattle and their progeny, FIGURE 4 shows the nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID NO 10) and predicted amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO. 9) of bovine NRAMPl, FIGURE 5 shows the hydrophobicity profile of the predicted amino acid sequence of bovine NRAMPl, FIGURE 6 shows a schematic representation of the putative structure of the bovine Nrampl protein, FIGURE 7A shows the sequences of bovine NRAMPl associated with susceptibility and resistance to disease (SEQ ID NO. 1 1, 12, 13 and 14), FIGURE 7B shows the generalized sequence of bovine NRAMPl associated with resistance (SEQ ID NO. 15); FIGURE 7C shows the generalized sequence of bovine NRAMPl associated with susceptibility; FIGURES 8A1 and 8A2 show the conserved amino acid sequence alignment at the 3' UTR of various ungulates, FIGURE 8B shows an alignment of the ammo acid sequences encoded by NRAMPl of bovine (BovNrampl) and bison (BisNrampl), FIGURE 8C shows the length and pattern of microsatellites for several species of mammals, FIGURE 8D shows the 3' Untranslated Sequence of Bison NRAMPl in Resistant (SEQ ID No 29) and Susceptible (SEQ ID NO 30) bison, FIGURE 9 shows the genetic mapping of bovine NRAMPl on BTA2, FIGURE 10 shows a representation of the conserved chromosomal segments among three species around the NRAMP 1 locus, FIGURE 1 1 shows a northern blot analysis of RNA isolated from bovine tissues and cells DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT: Genetic studies in mice have demonstrated that innate susceptibility to Mycobacterium bovis (BCG), Leishmama donovam. Salmonella typhimurim and several atypical mycobacteriae are controlled by a single gene on Mus Musculus (MMU) 1 autosome, called Beg, Lsh, or Ity (Mock et al 1990, Plant etal 1982, Schurr etal. 1991; Goto et al. 1989; Skamene et al. 1984, de Chastellier et al 1993, and Frelier et al 1990) Beg mediates antimicrobial activity of macrophages against intracellular parasites early during infection (Gros et al , 1983, Blackwell et al , 19 1, Roach et al , 1994, Roach et al , 1991) Cattle which are naturally resistant (R) or susceptible (S) to brucellosis were identified by in vivo Brucella abortus challenge experiments (Harmon et al 1985) Studies demonstrated that macrophages from resistant cattle were better able to control intracellular replication of B. abortus in an in vitro assay (Harmon et al 1989, Price et al. 1990, Campbell et al 1992) These observations were comparable to the differences in macrophage function between mice resistant and susceptible to M. bovis-BCG, .Salmonella typhimurtum and L. donovam controlled by the Bcg/Lsh/lty gene(s) (Radzioch et al 1991, Kramnik et al. 1994, Blackwell et al 1994, Gros et al. 1983, Blackwell et al 1991, Blackwell et al 1994; Roach et al. 1991) In mice, an approximately 30 cM segment on MMU1 (Mock et al 1990, Skow et al 1987, Malo et al. 1993) including Beg was reported to be conserved on Homo sapiens autosome (HSA) 2q (Cellier et al. 1994; White et al. 1994) and Bos taunts autosome (BTA) 2 (Womack et al 1986, Fries et al. 1993, Adkinson et al 1988, Beever et al 1994) Vidal and coworkers (Vidal et al 1993) isolated a murine Beg candidate gene, designated natural resistance associated macrophage protein (NRAMPl), that apparently encodes a polytopic integral membrane protein that has structural features similar to prokaryotic and eukaryotic transporters Recent studies using knockout mice have shown that NRAMPl is the Bcg/Lsh/lty gene It is suggested that the murine Nramp 1 protein might function in phagolysosomal membranes as a concentrator of oxidation products of nitric oxide, mediating cytocidal activity against the ingested parasites of infected macrophage (Vidal et al 1993, Malo et al 1994a, Cellier et al 1994, Malo et al 1994b) It has recently been indicated that the mammalian Nramp protein (at least Nramp 2) functions as a broad specificity divalent cations transporter (Gunshin et al., Nature 388 482, 1997, Fleming et al , Nature Genet 16 383, 1997) In the present invention, a study was undertaken to determine if a bovine homolog of the murine NRAMPl gene was expressed in bovine macrophages and involved in susceptibility of cattle to, for example, B. Abortus Comparison of human, murine and bovine homologs of the bovine NRAMPl gene product indicates a remarkable degree of homology (see, Figure 2) The bovine NRAMP 1 cDNA encodes a protein with an overall predicted amino acid sequence homology of 86 9% and 88 6% to the human NRAMPl and murine NRAMPl gene products, respectively. Northern blot and RT-PCR analysis indicate that similar to the human and murine gene products, bovine NRAMPl is principally expressed in the reticuloendothelia (RE) organs and macrophages (Vidal et al 1993, Cellier et al 1994, Gruenheid et al 1995) BAJI three homologs contain 12 potential membrane-spanning helical domains and several functional sequence motifs including an N-terminal SH3-binding PNNP motif, a 20 amino acid transport motif, also known as the "binding- protein-dependent transport system inner membrane component signature" motif within the transmembrane (TM) 8-9 segment (Vidal et al , 1993; Malo et al , 1994a, Cellier et al., 1994, Malo et al , 1994b) four Protein Kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation sites, and one predicted N-linked glycosylation site (Figure 2) Additionally, very few substitutions in the Nrampl protein appear to be tolerated in the membrane-spanning regions The bovine NRAMPl has been mapped to BTA 2 within a group of syntenic loci conserved on HSA 2q and murine chromosome 1 overlapping the Lsh/Ity/Bcg locus (Adkinson et al 1988, Beever /cr/ 1994, Cellier et al 1994; White et al 1994) Additionally, the ιnterleukιn-8 receptor is linked to bovine NRAMPl The data presented herein further extends the large conserved synteny of bovine, human, and murine genes on these chromosomes Taken altogether, these findings indicate that the observed collective properties have important structural and mechanistic roles in mediating Nramp 1 function SSCA (single stranded confor ational analysis) and SSCP (single stranded conformational polymorphism) analysis are two very similar techniques commonly used to detect differences in DNA sequences. SSCP tends to be slightly more sensitive; it can be used to detect singie nucleotide differences between two sequences. SSCA is often used when detecting multiple sequence differences such as those occurring in microsatellite DNA sequence regions. In the present invention, both SSCA and SSCP analysis, along with direct DNA sequencing, were used to show that different sequences of bovine NRAMPl associate with susceptibility or resistance to infection. The significant association of the bovine NRAMPl conformational polymorphisms (i.e. the sequence variations) associated with natural resistance or susceptibility to bovine brucellosis, inter alia, strongly suggests that, although the inventors do not wish to be bound by theory, bovine NRAMPl is the bovine Beg homolog or is equally important as Beg in regulating natural resistance to the intracellular parasites. In fact, the finding that sequence variants of bovine NRAMPl associate with resistance or susceptibility strengthens the case for the proposed role of NRAMPl in controlling natural resistance to brucellosis, salmonellosis, and tuberculosis in all artiodactyla. Potential mechanisms for bovine NRAMPl control over, or association with, resistance/susceptibility have been reviewed by others, which are incorporated herein by reference (Vidal et al. 1993; Cellier et al. 1994; Blackwell et al. 1994; Ivanyi et al 1994; Vidal et al. 1995; Blackwell et al. 1995). Given the conservation of NRAMPl genes in at least three species, it is likely that the fundamental function of the NRAMPl homologs against the different intracellular pathogens, such as, but not limited to, Mycobacteriae, Brucellae, Salmonellae, and Leishmania is conserved and may be related to the level of killing by macrophages. The exact mechanism may vary with different pathogens and can include transportation and production of nitrogen oxide; production of reactive nitrogen and oxygen intermediates; respiratory bursts and the hexose monophosphate shunt; SH3 and tyrosine kinase signal transduction; upregulation of MHC Class II expression; and interleukin- 1 production. Given the complex structure and conservation of the predicted Nramp 1 protein in three species, it would not be surprising if the proposed signaling and bactericidal mechanisms are involved in macrophage antimicrobial/parasite activity. While it is possible that the regulation of Nramp 1 activity may be different in the various species, with the high degree of similarity between the species, it is more likely that the fundamental function of Nrampl is conserved against the different intracellular pathogens, i.e. Mycobacteriae, Brucellae, Salmonellae, and Leishmania. Thus, the present invention which relates to the use of the discovered genetic variation in the NRAMPl gene in selecting and breeding domestic and free-ranging artiodactyla that are naturally resistant to these important diseases could play a key role in preharvest pathogen reduction in the National Hazard Critical Control Point (HACCP) program for farm use (Pierson, M D. and Corlett, D. A ., 1992; and Vanderzant, C, 1985). The mechanisms by which the sequence variations in the 3' UTR of NRAMPl contribute to susceptibility or resistance to disease caused by infection by intracellular parasites is not precisely known. However, and while not intending to be bound by or to a particular theory, applicants suggest that the variations in the 3' UTR sequence could affect the translation of the bovine NRAMPl message, with one sequence being transcribed more or less than the other. One possible mechanism by which this could occur could be selective ribosome instability on either the resistance-associated or susceptible-associated mRNA. This instability may result in a translation complex that is more likely to fall off the message of one sequence type than the other. An embodiment of the instant invention therefore involves the identification, cloning and use of an artiodactyla gene associated with resistance and susceptibility to disease(s) involving intracellular parasites, such as brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. More particularly, the present invention relates to the discovery that artiodactyla, and specifically ungulates, and more specifically, cattle, have a homolog (bovine NRAMPl) of the human and murine NRAMPl gene. The present invention discloses that this NRAMPl gene has at least two differing sequences in the 3' untranslated region of the gene that significantly (P=0.0089) associate with either the resistance or susceptibility of an animal containing the sequence to at least the diseases brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. Still more particularly, the present invention shows that at least these two different NRAMPl sequences can be readily differentiated by SSCA or SSCP analysis or any other technique suitable to detect a particular genetic sequence, for example, but not limited to direct sequencing, so that one can easily screen animals for the presence of either a resistance associated sequence or a susceptible associated sequence of NRAMPl . This information as to whether an animal contains either a resistant associated sequence or a susceptible associated sequence can then be used to predict whether the screened animal is likely to be susceptible or resistant to diseases caused by intracellular parasites such as brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. According to the screening results of the instant invention, susceptible animals can then be segregated, treated prophylactically or therapeutically, or sacrificed. Resistant animals, on the other hand, can then be safely raised, harvested and/or bred to create disease resistant animals Further, according to the present invention, animal breeding for disease resistance can be easily monitored by practicing the genetic screening methods of the invention in order to assay for the transmission of resistance to disease. Further still, the method of the present invention allows for the selective breeding of disease resistant animals based upon the selective tracking of only a single genetic trait and the assaying of that trait via genetic analysis, rather than phenotypic selection. This allows for the favorable trait to segregate and be traced independently, allowing for the selective tracing of the favorable genetic sequence, which can avoid unnecessary selection of unwanted traits and allow the simultaneous tracing of other favorable traits. The invention further relates to the use of the discovered sequences of bovine NRAMPl as indicated, or "genetic markers," of disease susceptibility or resistance in artiodactyla. Specifically, the invention includes the detection and identification of these specific gene sequences via conventional molecular biological techniques such as, but not limited to, SSCA and SSCP. Still more specifically, the present invention illustrates specific methods and materials (such as, for example, specific PCR primers) for identifying and distinguishing these sequences via SSCA, SSCP or direct sequencing. This allows one to screen an animal and detect which sequences of NRAMPl the animal possesses, which then allows the accurate prediction of the animal's susceptibility or resistance to disease. Still further, the present invention relates to the use of these predictive genetic markers in animal husbandry including in food production, and selective breeding of disease resistant animals, including cattle. The conception of this invention was based, in part, on a series of published reports on genetic selection of swine naturally resistant to swine brucellosis in the 1930's and 1940's. These publications reported that swine which did not produce antibodies to an oral challenge of virulent Brucella suis produced offspring that did not produce an antibody to a similar challenge approximately 70% of the time compared to a frequency of approximately 20% for progeny from unselected control groups. Id. The observation that approximately 20% of unvaccinated control cattle challenged with a virulent strain of Brucella abortus S2308 did not exhibit any signs of brucellosis (infection with Brucella abortus) and the lack of production of antibodies post-challenge led the inventors to hypothesize that this was a natural resistance to bovine brucellosis. The inventors then began breeding studies to determine if this natural resistance was heritable and to search for genes that could control this natural resistance, if it was heritable. The natural resistance was shown to be heritable as it responded to selection; a greater percentage of offspring were naturally resistant to brucellosis (57% compared to 37%) when a naturally resistant sire was bred to naturally resistant dams than when a naturally resistant sire was bred to naturally susceptible dams. Genetic studies in other animals indicated a major gene termed Beg might control this natural resistance to Mycobacterium bovis-BCG. A candidate gene in mice was reported (Vidal, et al., 1993). However, unlike the field of the present invention, this report was not in an artiodactyla animal. The inventors then proposed that cattle might possess a conserved homolog of the murine gene and that this conserved homolog might have a major controlling effect over the natural resistance to brucellosis in the cattle the inventors had been breeding. The inventors then tested the above hypothesis and cloned, sequenced, and genetically mapped bovine NRAMPl in the bovine. The bovine NRAMPl was mapped to BTA 2, within syntenic loci conserved on HSA 2q and MMU1. Bovine NRAMPl is expressed primarily in macrophages and tissues of the reticuloendothelial system, and is predicted to encode a 548 amino acid protein that has 12 transmembrane segments with one hydrophilic N-terminal region containing a Src homology 3 (SH3)-binding motif located at the cytoplasmic surface, and a conserved consensus transport motif. The gene is designated as bovine NRAMPl because of conserved genetic linkage, tissue expression, and amino acid sequence homology with murine NRAMPl. The inventors discovered macrophage restricted expression of the bovine NRAMPl gene, and importantly, discovered sequence and conformational differences in the bovine NRAMPl gene which significantly associate with natural resistance or susceptibility to brucellosis in cattle. Testing was also conducted to determine if bovine NRAMPl is conserved in other artiodactyla. Significantly, swine, goats, sheep bison (-American Buffalo), llamas, elk (wapiti), red deer, sika deer, water buffalo, follow deer, and white-tailed deer, indeed all artiodactyla (for a definition of artiodactyla, see Nowak, R. M. et al., 1983) analyzed thus far, have a conserved NRAMPl gene The present invention has also shown that cattle whose phenotypes have been ascertained to be resistant to a challenge of virulent B. abortus are significantly different in their ability to control the intracellular replication of Brucella abortus, Mycobacterium bovis-BCG, and Salmonella dublin in an in vitro macrophage killing assay than cattle whose phenotypes have been ascertained to be susceptible (85% correlation with challenge phenotype) (Qureshi, T., Templeton, J.W., and Adams, L. G. 1996).. These cattle were phenotyped both by an in vivo challenge with Brucella abortus Strain 2308 and by an in vitro macrophage killing assay of Brucella abortus Strain 2308, Mycobacterium bovis - BCG strain and Salmonella dublin to determine their resistance or susceptibility to bovine brucellosis and tuberculosis Using SSCA or SSCP, a genetic polymorphism was discovered in the 3' UTR of the gene. This polymorphism has two different forms which significantly associate (p = 0.0089) with naturally resistant and naturally susceptible phenotypes to bovine brucellosis, tuberculosis, salmonellosis, and paratuberculosis in unrelated cattle By screening for the particular polymorphism and/or sequence that a given animal has, one can accurately and efficiently predict the susceptibility, or resistance of that animal to ruminant brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis and other diseases involving intracellular parasites of macrophages. The bovine NRAMPl gene is conserved in Bos spp. Bison bison, Odocoileus virgimanus, Capra hints, A lees alces, Cervus canadensis, Cervus elaphus, Dama dama, Elaphurus davidianus, Ursus spp. Sus scrofa, and Oreamnos americanus (SEQ ID NOs. 16-27, respectively) and most likely all domestic and wild artiodactyla (see Figures 8A1 and 8A2 SEQ ID Nos. 16-27 and Figure 8C). In addition, the Nrampl protein is also highly conserved (see, for example, Figure 8B SEQ ID Nos 9 and 28). The discovered genetic variation in the 3' UTR of the NRAMPl gene of artiodactyla can be used, inter alia, in selecting and breeding domestic and free-ranging artiodactyla that are resistant to, inter alia, brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis The bovine NRAMPl polymorphism results from a transversion at position 1782 of the bovine NRAMPl cDNA; thymine in the resistant sequence to guanine in the susceptible sequence Additionally, there is a polymorphic DNA microsatellite sequence difference between resistant and susceptible cattle involving the number of (GT) dinucleotide repeats and spacing in the 3' UTR of bovine Nrampl. This sequence in resistant animals, beginning at position 1779, is. SEQ ID NO 15 GGGTGT(GT) I0 AT(GT) 3 (N) 61 (GT) 5 (N) 24 (GT) 13 where "N" symbolizes any one of the four nucleotide bases A, C, G or T. In contrast, the DNA sequences associated with susceptible cattle follow the form (GT) <10 AT(GT) 3 (N) >61 (GT) 5 (N) <24 (GT) 13 where "N" again symbolizes any one of the four nucleotide bases A C, G or T The detection of the resistance associated sequence or the susceptible associated sequence can be done by SSCA SSCP, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by direct DNA sequencing or any other technique known to those of skill in the art capable of detecting genetic sequence differences. The sequence of PCR primers used to detect the genomic DNA sequence of the bovine NRAMPl which contains the polymorphic DNA sequences associated with resistance or susceptibility are indicated in Figure 1 A, SEQ ID Nos 1 and 2. These PCR primers will amplify the resistant and susceptible allelic sequences in genomic (g) or cDNA. However, it should be stated that any PCR primers that will amplify the polymorphic region can also be used in this invention. In one screening trial (see Figure 3, for example), the bovine NRAMPl sequences correctly identified animals as being either resistant or susceptible in 18 of 22 cattle naturally resistant or susceptible to brucellosis (Figure 3 A and Figure 3B) (Significant association, p = 0 0089, Fisher's exact analysis) Importantly, these 22 cattle were all unrelated animals The bovine NRAMPl sequences can be detected in gDNA isolated from any tissue including gDNA isolated from, but not limited to, peripheral blood samples, semen, mucosal scrapings, etc using PCR amplification. As shown in Example 9, for example, approximately 82% of the cattle naturally resistant or susceptible to brucellosis and tuberculosis can be identified by typing them for the bovine NRAMPl resistant or susceptible polymoφhism by using SSCP (or SSCA) The zygosity of cattle for the resistant associated polymoφhism (heterozygote or homozygote genotype) can be determined and a breeding program can be practiced to efficiently produce cattle naturally resistant to brucellosis and tuberculosis. Additionally, the bovine NRAMPl gene is a good candidate gene for production of transgenic animals which possess genes for outstanding production traits and by transgene action are naturally resistant to, inter alia, brucellosis, salmonellosis, paratuberculosis, and tuberculosis. The genetic selection of breeding animals for a single locus is not detrimental to overall animal production i.e. beef, muscle, grain or milk production, as long as a breeding plan is constructed to buffer this effect All of the other chromosomes will segregate by independent assortment and will peφetuate heterozygosity Additionally, with the current availability of microsatellite markers spaced throughout the bovine genome, selection for disease resistant genotypes can now be achieved without compromising other desirable production traits while maximizing heterozygosity at approximately 100 microsatellite loci With the development of the bovine gene map and the identification of major genes controlling economically important traits in cattle and other livestock, the ability to identify a prized genotype of disease resistance and high quality production will be possible in the near future. Tremendous progress in cattle breeding will be realized when it is possible to select for superior genotypes directly by identifying important genes. The SSCP or SSCA based detection of NRAMPl polymorphic sequences can be conducted on gDNA isolated from antemortem or postmortem tissues, provided the postmortem tissue has been reasonably protected from a DNA degrading environment where autolysis of the tissue would occur In a preferred embodiment, one mode for the detection of the artiodactyla NRAMPl sequences is in a laboratory with routine DNA isolation, DNA PCR amplification, electrophoresis technique, SSCA, SSCP analysis, direct DNA sequencing or any other technique suitable for detecting differences in genetic sequences. In a preferred embodiment, one mode for identification of the artiodactyla NRAMPl resistant and susceptible associated sequences is by specific PCR amplification of gDNA isolated from an individual animal's peripheral blood collected in an anticoagulant The PCR amplification can performed in an ordinary laboratory with capabilities of performing the polymerase chain reaction and ordinary expertise in molecular biology. With hand-held thermal cyclers it is also possible to perform the PCR amplification of the alleles outside the laboratory in a so-called "chute- side" assay shortly after the blood is collected. In a preferred embodiment, one mode for utilizing the present invention in detecting the NRAMPl resistant and susceptible sequences is by a PCR amplification of gDNA isolated from peripheral blood of individual artiodactyla animals followed by SSCA or SSCP analysis of the PCR product. The isolation of the gDNA from blood cells can be done by standard methods suitable for subsequent PCR amplification. As shown in Example 8 and Figure 1A, PCR primer sequences can be used to amplify the polymorphic DNA region of both resistant and susceptible animals, namely cattle. PCR products can be specifically labeled, either by using radioactive nucleotides in the PCR reaction (as in the case of SSCA) or by using a specifically end-labeled primer (as in the case of SSCP analysis) in the PCR reaction. It should be stated that other radioactive (i.e. 32 P, 33 P, etc.) or non-radioactive alternatives (for example, but not limited to DIG-labeling) can be used to specifically label the PCR products These amplicons can then be run on a polyacrylamide gel and the migration of the amplicons visualized by standard autoradiographic techniques. It should be noted that if, for example, non-radioactive labeling techniques are used, alternative detection methods can also be employed. Susceptible-associated and resistance-associated DNA sequences can be readily distinguished (Figure 3 A) The banding patterns of amplicons from resistance- associated and susceptible-associated DNA are quite different; the amplicons from resistance- associated DNA sequences show faster migration through the gel as is expected from their smaller size amplicons (175bp for resistance associated amplicons vs >175bp for susceptible associated amplicons). One primary advantage of a diagnostic test using SSCA or SSCP analysis is that this technology is readily available. It is relatively simple compared to many techniques used to identify DNA sequences; it is relatively inexpensive to equip a laboratory with the necessary equipment; it is conducive technology for mass through-put of large numbers of samples, and the relatively simple technology yields in minimal false (positive or negative) test results when properly controlled. Further, because the resistance and susceptibility associated sequences are genetic, they are transferable, meaning, for example, resistance can be a heritable trait. Since the transmission of these diseases is dependent on a susceptible host, resistant animals offer an excellent opportunity to break the cycle of disease spread and begin eradication. There are no particular unique disadvantages to the proposed SSCA or SSCP analysis based assay compared to other molecular biologic diagnostic tests All such tests require some specialized equipment, a laboratory utilizing basic good laboratory practices and at least currently, tissue (blood) collection and transportation to a laboratory The occasional stress associated with restraining an animal for blood collection will not effect the test results. A major puφose of this invention is to identify sequences of NRAMPl associated with resistance or susceptibility to disease, using SSCA or SSCP-based techniques which results in correctly identifying artiodactyla that are naturally resistant to brucellosis, tuberculosis, salmonellosis, and paratuberculosis with a high degree, for example 82%, of accuracy. There are several possibilities which could account for the lack of 100% SSCP association with resistant phenotypes It is possible that Beg is not a single gene but a gene complex and NRAMPl is one of the Beg genes, or there are two or more genes controlling natural resistance to bovine brucellosis. Alternatively, NRAMPl may be in linkage disequilibrium with the Beg gene and is a marker gene for the Bcg rmi alleles. The lack of 100% association of the bovine NRAMPl SSCP with the natural resistant or susceptible phenotypes could also be due to incorrect ascertainment of some of the true cattle R or S phenotypes caused by genetic heterogeneity, phenocopies, lack of penetrance, or error in the challenge procedure We attempted to minimize effects of phenocopies by a uniform, potent challenge (conjunctival instillation of 10 7 colony forming units of virulent B. abortus). An indication that lack of penetrance is not a major problem is the fact that the phenotypes of the founders respond to genetic selection in breeding studies (Templeton et al 1990a, Templeton et al. 1990b). The fact that the cattle used in these studies are derived from four different breeds implies genetic heterogeneity does not confound the phenotypes and provides strong, direct evidence that NRAMPl is a likely candidate for a major gene controlling natural resistance to, inter alia, brucellosis, and in particular bovine NRAMPl is a likely candidate for a major gene controlling natural resistance to, inter alia, bovine brucellosis. The following Examples are intended to illustrate the embodiments of the present invention and are not in any way intended to limit the scope of the invention in any manner. Example 1 Cloning of Bovine NRAMPl and Isolation of Bovine NRAMPl cDNA The bovine NRAMPl gene was cloned as follows Based on the genomic sequence of murine NRAMP-1, oligonucleotide primers SEQ ID NO. 3 and SEQ ID NO. 4 (also designated as IF and 1R) were used to amplify a 155 bp segment in bovine genomic DNA (Figure IB) From this 155 bp bovine sequence, RT-PCR was performed on bovine macrophage mRN-A, using a bovine specific forward primer designated SEQ ID NO. 5 (PE2) 5' CGTGGTGACAGGCAAGGACT 3' and a reverse primer, SEQ ID NO. 6 (MUT2). 5' CCAAGAAGAGGAAGAAGAAGG-TGTC 3' from the murine NRAMPl cDNA sequence (Vidal et al. 1993). Reverse transcription was performed as follows Total RNA was extracted from bovine macrophage, spleen, lung, or heart as described (Chirgwin et al. 1979). 0.5 μg total RNA was transcribed in 25 μl reaction at 37°C for 60 min. with MMLV reverse transcriptase (Gibco-BRL). cDNA amplification was performed at 95°C (5 min) followed by 32 cycles of 94°C (1 min), 58°C ( 1 min), and 72 °C (1 min) with 1 mM MgCI 2 , 2 μ\ 10X PCR buffer, 2 Units Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer) and 4 μl RT template in a final volume of 25 μl A 222 bp product was amplified from reverse transcribed bovine macrophage total RNA. Sequence analysis showed that this PCR product contained 90% nucleotide identity with the third exon (nucleotide positions 338-458) of the murine homolog The 222 bp product was generated to screen a bovine splenic λgtl 1 cDNA library (Clontech). A total of 1 X IO 6 clones were screened by in situ plaque hybridization with radioiabeled [ 32 P]-α-dCTP (3000Ci/mmol) (Dupont, NEN Research Products) by hexamer priming (1-3 X IO 9 cpm/μg)(Feinberg et al., 1983). Filters were washed under conditions of increasing stringency up to 1 X SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65°C for 30 min Positive clones were verified using PCR with primers SEQ ID NO 5 (PE2) and SEQ ID NO 6 (MUT-2 ) and subsequently PCR amplified to obtain a 2 3 kb insert with λgtl 1 insert screening amplimers This PCR product was gel purified and ligated into pT7BlueT- Vector (Novagen). Both strands of plasmid DNA were sequenced by the dideoxy method of Sanger et al. (Sanger et al. 1977) using modified T7 DNA polymerase (USB) and [ 35 S]-α-dATP (3000Ci mmol) (NEN Research Products, Boston, MA). All sequence data were compiled and analyzed using MacVector 4.1 software (Eastman Kodak Comp. New Haven, CT) Twenty potentially full-length NRAMPl clones(~2 3 kb) were obtained, eight of which were sequenced and used to construct the complete sequence. As shown in Figure 4, the in-frame initiator codon ATG is located at nucleotide position 73 from the 5'-end, and is followed by a segment of 1644 nucleotides, forming a single open reading frame (ORF) encoding a protein of 548 residues with a calculated molecular weight of 59 6 KDa A TGA termination codon located immediately downstream from glycine 548 (nucleotide pst 1717) is followed by an intact AATAAA polyadenylation signal, position 2257. Example 2: Analysis of the predicted bovine NRAMPl structure Note that as used herein, it is understood that the term "NRAMPl " includes the coding sequence and at least the 3' UTR of the gene. The first 64 N-terminal amino acids of Bovine NRAMPl are rich in proline (1 1/64), glycine ( 10/64), serine (8/64), and charged amino acids ( 10/64), and include two putative PKC phosphorylation sites at amino acid positions 37 and 51 (Figure 2). Because SH3 domains interact specifically with proline-rich peptides, we compared the proline-rich coding fragment PPSPEP (positions 21 -26) to several identified SH3- binding sequences (Lim et al. 1994). The analysis revealed that the "PNNP" binding motif (Musacchio et al. 1994) is conserved in bovine Nrampl, which indicates that bovine Nrampl contains an N- terminal SH3 binding domain. Kyte-Doolittle hydrophilicity analysis (Figure 5) disclosed that the surface probability of peptide PPSPEP is from 50.3% to 67.6%, which indicates that the bovine Nrampl SH3 -binding motif is most likely located at the inner membrane surface. Analysis of the remaining bovine NRAMPl indicates the predicted protein to be highly hydrophobic with 12 putative transmembrane domains (Figure 6) in agreement with the murine and human Nramp l putative structure (Vidal et al. 1993; Barton et al. 1994; Cellier et al. 1994). The bovine NRAMPl gene product contains one potential N-linked glycosylation site at position 335, within a highly hydrophilic region between predicted transmembrane (TM) domains 7 and 8, and three PKC phosphorylation sites on serine (positions 37, 51 , and 269, respectively). A 20 amino acid transport motif is located between the predicted TM domains 8 and 9 and conserved in murine and human Nramp l (Fig. 2). This conserved motif is known as the "binding-protein-dependent transport system inner membrane component signature" (Vidal et al. 1993; Malo et al. 1994a; Cellier et al. 1994; Malo et al. 1994b). Based on the hydropathic analysis and conversed transport motif, we propose, but not in a limiting sense, that the membrane-associated topography of bovine Nrampl (Figure 6) is as follows: the NH2-terminus is located in the cytoplasm, and the following 12 TM domains result in 5 consecutive transmembrane loops. This arrangement would place the SH3- binding motif on the cytoplasmic membrane surface, SH3 -binding domain with two potential phosphorylation sites and the transmembrane (TM) loops 2 and 3 and the TM 6 and TM 7 loops containing one phosphorylation site each, all projecting into the cytoplasm; the TM 7 and TM 8 loop containing one predicted N-linked extra-cellular glycosylation site; and the carboxyl terminus in the cytoplasm. Example 3 Homology among human, muπne, and bovine Nramp proteins Comparison of human, muπne and bovine predicted Nramp protein sequences (Figure 2) indicates a remarkable degree of homology (86 9% amino acid sequence identity between munne and bovine, 88 6% amino acid sequence identity between human and bovine) The predicted TM segments 1-8 are highly conserved hydrophobic membrane associated domains in the three species, with 99% identity between human and bovine, and 96% identity between muπne and bovine The most conserved consecutive region is from TM 8-9 with 100% identity from position 346 to 456 between human and bovine, 98 2% identity between muπne and bovine Within the TM 8-9 segment, the bovine "binding protein dependent transport system inner membrane component signature" was identical with muπne and human Nramp with one exception (substitution of lysme to arginine at position 392 in the human (Figure 2) .Also among these three species, one predicted N-linked glycosylation site was conserved within the fourth putative extracellular loop between TM 7 and 8, and one consensus PKC phosphorylation site was conserved in the predicted lntracytoplasmic loop between TM 6 and 7 at position 37 (Figure 2) (Vidal et al 1993, Cellier et al 1994, Gruenheid e/ α/ 1995) .Ammo acid substitutions were not randomly distributed along the sequence of the protein but were significantly clustered within certain regions The most striking differences were located at extreme ends of the proteins, NH2 terminus (574% identity of positions 1-47 between muπne and bovine, 66% identity of positions 1-50 between human and bovine) and COOH-terminus (57 6% identity of positions 516-548 between murine and bovine, 69 6% identity between human and bovine) The predicted third and fourth extracellular loops at positions 215-237 and positions 307- 346 were less conserved in ammo acid sequences than the TM domains Identity was 78 2% between murine and bovine and 82 0% between human and bovine for the predicted third extracellular loop, respectively, and 75 0% identity between murine and bovine and 85% identity between the human and bovine, respectively, for the predicted fourth extracellular loop Example 4 Genetic mapping of Bovine NRAMPl Genetic Mapping was performed as follows Bovine-hamster hybπd somatic cell panel blots (Womack et al 1986, Adkinson et al 1988, Beever et al 1994) were hybridized with the 1F/1R PCR generated probe (4-8 X IO 8 cpm/μg) (Feinberg et al 1983) Hybπdization was performed at 43 °C for 18 hrs in 20 ml of 50% formamide, 5X SSC, 1 X Denhardt's solution, and 20 mM NaPO 4 (pH-6 8), followed by washing once in 2X SSC, 0 5% SDS at room temperature for 15 mm , two successive washes in IX SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65°C for 30 min (Adkinson et al. 1988) All gene probes were labeled with the random primed DNA labeling method is α-[ 32 P] dCTP (3000Ci mmol) (NEN Research Products, Boston, MA (Feinberg et al. 1983). Synteny was ascertained by analysis of concordancy of the probe with known marker genes as described (Womack et al. 1986; Adkinson et al. 1988; Womack et al. 1994). The syntenic aπangement of bovine NRAMPl was determined using somatic cell hybrid segregation analysis (Womack et al. 1986; White et al. 1994). DNA from 87 bovine/rodent somatic hybrid cells was digested with Hind III and hybridized to a PCR generated probe using SEQ ID NO. 3 and SEQ ID NO 4 (IF and 1R) primers (Figure IB) The bovine specific Hind III restriction fragment of 4.7 kb was easily discriminated from fragments representing the hamster and mouse homologs, permitting detection of bovine-specific fragments in each cell line. A pairwise concordancy analysis indicated that bovine NRAMPl segregated 100% concordantly with Cry-γ, which has been assigned to BTA 2 (Figure 9). An analysis of 87 somatic hybrids revealed that 28 were positive and 59 were negative for both Cry-γ and bovine NRAMPl A group of bovine syntenic loci, villin, Cry-γ (Adkinson et al 1988, Beever et al. 1994) and lnterleukin-8 receptor has been mapped to a region of BTA 2 and conserved on HSA 2q (White et al. 1994) and proximal MMU 1 (Cerretti et al. 1993), which were closely linked to the Lsh/ ty/Bcg locus in the mouse (Figure 10). These results further support the homology among human, bovine and murine NRAMP. Example 5: Single-stranded conformational analysis (SSCA) We have identified cattle phenotypically resistant and susceptible to brucellosis by in vivo challenge (Harmon et al. 1 85) Screening of 22 outbred, unrelated individuals by SSCA revealed the existence of two general single stranded polymorphic forms of bovine NRAMPl (Figure 3 A). Sequencing analyses of the PCR-amplified fragments showed a microsatellite length polymoφhism starting at position 1785 of two types; one being SEQ ID NO. 31 : 5' (GT) 10 AT(GT) 3 (N) 61 (GT) 5 (N) 24 (GT) U 3'. the other being (GT) <10 AT(GT) 3 (N) >61 (GT) 5 (N) 24 (GT) >13 where "N" symbolizes any one of the four nucleotide bases A, C, G or T (Figure 7A). These polymorphisms correlate both with their distinctive patterns analyzed by SSCA or SSCP and with their respective in vivo phenotypes [p = 0 0089, Fisher's Exact Analysis]. We will designate the former DNA sequence as SSCP r and the latter sequence as SSCP S The relative risk (RR) of susceptibility, ' if an animal possess the SSCP 5 is 4 5 Example 6: Cell specific expression of Bovine Nrampl- J mRNA To test whether bovine NRAMPl was expressed primarily in macrophage populations, we analyzed total RNA prepared from 15 different bovine tissues (peripheral blood lymphocytes, liver, lymph node, spleen, tonsil, lung, kidney, thymus, heart, skeletal muscle, jejunum, colon, ovary, uterus, brain and cultured macrophages) by northern blot analysis using a SEQ ID NO 3 and SEQ ID NO. 4 PCR generated bovine DNA probe (Figure 1 1) Northern blot analysis was performed as follows. Monocyte-derived macrophages were harvested and cultured as described (Campbell and Adams 1993) Total RNA was isolated from these macrophages and lymphocytes using standard techniques (Chirgwin et al. 1979) 10 μg of total RNA from macrophages and lymphocytes were separated on 1% formaldehyde agarose gels, transferred to Nytran plus membranes (Schleicher & Schuell). Blots were prehybridized in 20 ml of 50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 4 7X SSPE (IX SSPE is 10 mM sodium phosphate, lmM EDTA 150 mM NaCl), 0.47X Denhardt's solution, 0.1% SDS, 0 18 mg/ml heat-denatured salmon sperm DNA, and 0 34% fat free milk for 4 hrs at 42°C. Hybridization at 42°C for 18 hrs was performed in the same solution containing 2 X IO 8 cpm/ml [ 32 P]-radiolabeled probe SEQ ID NO. 3 and SEQ ID NO 4 fragment. Final wash conditions were 0.2 X SSC, 0.1% SDS at 68°C for 30 min. A band of approximately 2 3 kb was detected in macrophage, spleen and lung RNA but was absent in the RNA analyzed from other tissues These results indicate that bovine Nrampl is principally expressed in the macrophage and the reticuloendothelial (RE) system. The following Examples are intended to illustrate the embodiments of the present invention and are not in any way intended to limit the scope of the invention in any manner Example 7 Identification of animals naturally resistant or susceptible to disease (traditional method) Cattle were phenotyped for resistance or susceptibility by both in vivo challenge experiments with Brucella abortus Strain 2308 and by an in vitro macrophage killing assay. In vivo assays: Unvaccinated control cattle were challenged with a virulent strain of Brucella abortus S2308 Those not exhibiting any signs of brucellosis, bacteriologically culture negative for B. abortus, and lacking production of anti-lipopolysaccharide B. abortus antibodies post-challenge were considered naturally resistant Those exhibiting signs of brucellosis, bacteriologically B. abortus culture positive, or producing anti-lipopolysaccharide B. abortus antibodies post-challenge were considered naturally susceptible (Harmon et al 1985). In vitro assays Macrophages from unvaccmated control cattle were isolated according to standard techniques and subsequently challenged with B abortus in an in vitro assay (Harmon et al 1989, Pπce et al 1990, Campbell et al 1992) The macrophages from those cattle that were able to control intracellular replication of B. abortus in vitro were considered resistant, while the macrophages from cattle that were not as good at controlling intracellular replication of B. abortus in vitro were considered susceptible Example 8 Single Stranded Conformational -Analysis (SSCA) In a total PCR reaction of 15 μl used for SSC inventors mixed 0 2 mM each dGTP, dGTP, dCTP , 0 07 mM dATP, 1 mM MgCl 2 , 10X M PCR buffer, 0 2 Units of Taq DNA polymerase (Cetus-Perkm Elmer), and 8 μCi of [ 35 S]-dATP with 50 ng genomic DNA Parameters for PCR amplification were a single denaturation step of 5 min at 94 °C followed by 32 cycles of denaturation (1 min at 94°C), annealing (40 sec at 60°) and extension ( 1 mm at 72°C), and a final extension step of 7 mm at 72°C The ohgonucleotide primers designed from 3'-UT were SEQ ID NO 1 (Fmicrol) = 5' AAGGCAGCAAGACAGACAGG 3', nucleotide positions 1814-1833 and SEQ ID NO 2 (3end3) = 5" ATGGAACTCACGTTGGCTG 3', nucleotide positions 1970-198) The SSCA polymorphisms of 22 unrelated cattle were detected by separating these 175 bp PCR fragments on 6% polyacrylamide gels with or without urea at room temperature at 90W for 2 5 hr SSCP Analysis SSCP was performed essentially the same as SSCA with the following two exceptions First, for SSCP analysis, either SEQ ID NO 1 or SEQ ID NO 2 was end-labeled pπor to the PCR reaction rather than having [ 35 S]-dATP in the PCR reaction mix Second, for SSCP analysis, the polyacrylamide gels always contained urea Example 9 Specific Genetic Sequences Associated with NRAMPl in situ Significantly Associate with Resistance or Susceptibility to Ruminant Brucellosis, Tuberculosis, Paratuberculosis and Salmonellosis The cattle used in these expeπments are all unrelated One is a purebred Angus (Bos taurus) and other twenty two are cross bred cattle produced by a three-way cross - F, [Jersey (Bos taurus) X American Brahman (Bos mdicus)] (Harmon et al. 1985) -All animals used in experiments were housed in USDA-approved facilities with daily supplemental feeding All expeπmental protocols are University reviewed and approved PCR amplification of DNA isolated from susceptible or resistance cattle was performed as follows In a total PCR reaction of 15 μl used for SSCA 0.2 mM dGTP, dTTP and dCTP, 0 07 mM dATP, 1 mM MgCl 2 , 1.5 μl 10 X PCR buffer, 0.2 Units of Tag DNA polymerase (Cetus-Perkin Elmer), and 8 μCi of [ 35 S]-dATP were added to 50 ng of genomic DNA Parameters for PCR amplification were a single denaturation step of 5 min at 94°C followed by 32 cycles of denaturation (1 min at 94°C), annealing (40 sec at 60°C) and extension (1 min at 72°C), and a final extension step of 7 min at 72°C The oligonucelotide primers designed from the 3' UTR were SEQ ID NO. 1 and SEQ ID NO. 2 (Figure 1A) This amplified DNA was then subjected to gel electrophoresis under SSCA or SSCP conditions Namely, the PCR fragments were run on a 6% polyacrylamide gel (National Diagnostics, G A ) at room temperature at 90W for 2 5 hrs The different migration patterns of the amplified DNA under these gel conditions correlated with the phenotype of the cattle previously determined by in vivo or in vitro challenge experiments with B. abortus (Harmon et al., 1985) PCR amplification of DNA (using SEQ ID NO.1 and SEQ ID NO. 2 as primers) from cattle previously determined to be resistant produced an amplicon that migrated faster than the DNA isolated and amplified from cattle determined to be sensitive when said amplicons were run on a 6% polyacrylamide gel under said conditions (Figure 3). Subsequent sequencing of the amplicons from some of these cattle revealed two significant sequence differences (Figure 7A) These sequence differences correlated with in vivo determined resistance/susceptibility and can be categorized into two general groups. The DNA amplified from resistant cattle corresponds to DNA sequences of the type GGGTGT(GT) 10 AT(GT) 3 (N) 6I (GT) 5 (N) 24 (GT) 13 whereas the DNA amplified from susceptible cattle corresponds to DNA sequences of the type GGGGGT(GT) <10 AT(GT) 3 (N) >61 (GT) 5 (N) <24 (GT) >I3 Although SSCA and SSCP cannot determine the exact DNA sequence of the cattle in this region, the differences in migration patterns of the susceptible and resistant-associated amplicons allow us to define said amplicons as being SSCP r or SSCP' for single stranded conformation polymoφhism of the resistant or susceptible type, respectively In addition, because of the conserved nucleotide sequence among swine, goats, sheep, bison (American buffalo), llamas, elk (wapiti), red deer, sika deer, water buffalo, fallow deer, white-tailed deer, and most likely all domestic and wild artiodactyla in this region, we can expect these same sequence differences and their relationship to disease susceptibility to be applicable to all artiodactyla (see, Figures 8A1, 8A2, and 8C) In this regard, the intracellular survival of Brucella abortus and Mycobacterium bovis BCG was determined in an in vitro monocyte-derived macrophage killing assay using macrophages from Bison phenotypically determined to be naturally resistant or susceptible to Brucella abortus infection, see Table 1 Table 1 Intracellular Survival of Brucella abortus and Mycobacterium bovis BCG in an in vitro Monocyte-derived Macrophage Killing Assay Using Macrophages from Bison Phenotypically determined to be naturally resistant or susceptible to Brucella abortus Infection. B. abortus M. bovis BCG Bison Number % Survival 2 1-R 1 81% 75% 2-R 84% 84% 3-R 64% 77% 4-R 86% 76% 5-R 93% 87% 6-R 59% 87% 7-S 1 123% 121% 8-S 120% 125% 9-S 110% 123% 10-S 150% 200% 'The R and S designates bison phenotypically determined to be naturally resistant (R) or susceptible (S) to Brucella abortus. This was determined by a challenge of a not previously exposed, either by natural exposure or vaccination, pregnant bison at mid-gestation with 1 x 10 7 virulent B. abortus organisms Percent survival refers to the number of B. abortus organisms that survive after being phagocytosed by the macrophages compared to the numbers of bacteria at Time 0 after 3 days of culture for the B. abortus and 14 days of culture for theλf. bovis BCG. In addition, these in vitro phenotypically determined resistant/susceptibility profiles of bison were compared with the genotypically determined resistant/susceptibility profiles determined from the 3' UTR of the bison NRAMPl gene. Similar to the bovine studies, a correlation between the sequence at the 3' UTR of bison NRAMPl and the resistance/susceptibility phenotype exists The bison phenotypically determined to be resistant, had a resistance-associated gene sequence at the 3' UTR, while the bison phenotypically determined to be susceptible, had a susceptible-associated gene sequence at the 3' UTR (Figure 8D) Figure 8D shows the NRAMPl cDNA sequences of the 3'UTR in naturally susceptible and resistant bison Nucleotides are numbered positively in the 5' to 3' orientation to the right of each lane, starting with the coding nucleotide G at 1676 and ending with the last nucleotide Stop code ATG is indicated by (@) Three TG repeats including (TG)13, (TG)8, and (TG)16 are bolded, separately The differences between the R and S nucleotide sequences are the S sequence has one less TG in the first repeat (TG)12 versus (TG)I3 and is therefore two bases shorter overall (2259) versus (2261) for this area of the NRAMPl 3' UT sequence The polymoφhisms containing the first (TG)13 were detected by SSCA using primers Fmicro and Bmicrol' as indicated REFERENCES I Adkison, L R , Leung, D.W , Womack, J E Somatic cell mapping and restriction fragment analysis of bovine alpha and beta mterferon gene families Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 47, 62-65 (1988) 2 Barton, C H , White, J K , Roach, T I A , Blackwell, J M NH2-termιnal sequence of macrophage-expressed natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (Nramp) encodes a proline serine-rich putative Src homology 3-binding domain J.Exp. Med. 179, 1683-1687 (1994) 3 Beever, J E , Da, Y , Ron, M , Lewin, H A A genetic map of nine loci on bovine Chromosome 2 Mamm. Gen. 5, 542-545 (1994) 4 Blackwell, J M , Barton, C H , White, J K , Roach, T I A , Shaw, M A , Whitehead, S H , et al. Genetic regulation of leishmanial and mycobactenal infections the Lsh/Ity/Bcg gene story continues Immunol. Lett. 43, 99-107 (1994) 5 Blackwell, J , Roach, T I A , Atkinson, S E , Ajioka, J W , Barton, C H , Shaw, M Genetic regulation of macrophage priming/activation the Lsh gene story Immunol. Lett. 30, 241-248 (1991) 6 Cameron, H S , E H Hughes, and P W Gregory Genetic resistance to brucellosis in swine JAmm Sci 1 106-1 10 (1942) 7 Cameron, H S , E H Hughes, and P W Gregory Studies on genetic resistance in swine to Brucella infection Preliminary Report Cornell Vet 30 218-222 (1940) 8 Campbell, G A , Adams, L G The long-term culture of bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and their use m the study of intracellular proliferation of Brucella abortus. Vet. Immunol, lmmunopathol. 34, 291 -305 (1992) 9 Cellier, M , Govom, G , Vidal, S , Kwan, T , Groulx, N , Liu, J , et al Human natural resistance-associated macrophage protein cDNA cloning, chromosomal mapping, genomic organization, and tissue-specific expression J. Exp. Med 180, 1741-1752 (1994) 10 Cerretti, D P , Nelson, N„ Kozlosky, C J , Mo ssey, P J , Copeland, N G , Gilbert, D J , et al The murine homolog of the human interleukin-8 receptor type B maps near the Ity/Lsh/Bcg disease resistance locus Genomics 18, 410- 13 (1993) I I Chirgwin, J M , Przybyla, A E , MacDonald, R J Rutter, W J Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease Biochemistry 18, 5294-5299 (1979) 12 de Chastellier, C , Frehel, C , Offredo, C Skamene, E Implication of phagosomelysosome fusion in restriction of Mycobacterium avium growth in bone marrow macrophages from genetically resistant mice Infect. Immun. 61, 3775-3784 (1993) 13 Dietrich, R A , S H Hughes, and P W Gregory Economic and Epidemiologic Analysis of U S Bovine Brucellosis Programs Primary Report, Vol I, p 1-24 Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas ( 1986) 14 Dosik, J K , Barton, C H , Holiday, D L , Krall, M M , Blackwell, J M , Mock, B A An Nrα/M/?-related sequence maps to mouse Chromosome 17 Mamm. Gen. 5, 458-460 (1994) 15 el-Gazzar, F E and E H MarthSalmonellae, salmonellosis, and dairy foods a review J Dairy Sci 75 2327-43 (1992) 16 Essey M A Bovine tuberculosis eradication A national challenge, p 38-46 In B Osburn (Ed ), Proc. of the 12th Annual World Assoc. of Vet. Microbiologists, Immunologists, and Specialists in Infectious Diseases University of California, Davis C A ( 1991 ) 17 Essey, M A and M A Koller Status of bovine tuberculosis in North -Ameπca Vet. Microbiol 40 15-22 (1994) 18 Feinberg, A P , Vogelstein, B A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity Anal. Biochem. 132, 6-13 (1983) 19 Frelier, P F , Templeton, J W , Estes, M , Whitford, H W , Kienle, R.D Genetic regulation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection in recombinant inbred mice Vet. Pathol. 17, 362-364 (1990) 20 Fries, R , Eggen, A , Womack, J E The bovine genome mapping project Mamm. Gen. 4, 405-428 (1993) 21 Goto, Y Buschman, E , Skamene, E Regulation of host resistance to Mycobacterium intracellular in vivo and in vitro by Beg gene Immunogenetics 30, 218-221 (1989) 22 Gros, P , Skamene, E , Forget, A Cellular mechanisms of genetically controlled host resistance to Mycobacterium bovis (BCG) J. Immunol. 131, 1966- 1972 ( 1983 ) 23 Gruenheid, S , Cellier, M , Vidal, S , Gros, P Identification and characteπzation of a second mouse Nramp gene Genomics 25, 99- 107 (1995) 24 Harmon, B G , Templeton, J W , Crawford, R P , Williams, J D , Adams, L G in Genetic Control of Host Resistance to Infection and Malignancy, (ed Skamene, E ) 345-354 (Alan R Liss, Inc , New York, 1985) 25 Harmon, B G , Adams, L G , Templeton, J W , Smith, R , III Macrophage function in mammary glands of Brucella abortus-infected cows and cows that resisted infection after inoculation of Brucella abortus. Am J. Vet. Res. 50, 459-465 (1989) 26 Ivanyi, J Molecular biology of natural disease resistance-associated macrophage protein Parasitol. Today 10, 416-417 (1994) 27 Kramnik, I , Radzioch, D , Skamene, E T-helper 1-like subset selection in Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin-infected resistant and susceptible mice Immunology 81, 618-625 (1994) 28 Lim, W A , Richards, F M Critical residues in an SH3 domain from Sem-1 suggests a mechanism for proline-rich peptide recognition Nature Struct. Biol 1, 221-225 (1994) 29 Malo, D , Vidal, S M., Hu, J , Skamene, E , Gros, P High-resolution linkage map in the vicinity of the host resistance locus Beg Genomics 16, 655-663 (1993) 30 Malo, D , Skamene, E Genetic control of host resistance to infection TIG 10, 365-371 (1994) 31 Malo, D , Vogan, K , Vidal, S , Hu, J , Cellier, M , Schurr, E , et al Haplotype mapping and sequence analysis of the mouse Nramp gene predicts susceptibility to infection with intracellular parasites Genomics 23, 51-61 (1994) 32 Martin, S W , R A Dietrich, P Genho, W P Heuschele, R L Jones, M Koller, J D Lee, H Campos, A Robinson, and G W Williams, Livestock disease eradication Evaluation of the cooperative state-federal bovine tuberculosis eradication program P 1-97 National Research Council, Washington, D C (1994) 33 Mock, B , -Krall, M , Blackwell, J , O'Brien, A D , Schurr, E , Gros, P , et al A genetic map of mouse chromosome 1 near the Lsh-Ity-Bcg disease resistance locus Genomics 1, 57-64 (1990) 34 Musacchio, A , Saraste, M , Wilmans, M High-resolution crystal structures of tyrosine kinase SH3 domains complexed with proline-rich peptides Nature Struct. Biol. 1, 546-551 (1994) 35 Nowak, R M and Paradiso, J L /n Walker's mammals of the World, 4th Edition, The John's Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London (1983) 36 Pierson, M D and Corlett, D A HACCP Principles and Applications AVI Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 212 (1992) 37 Plant, J E , Blackwell, J M O'Brien, A D , Bradley, D J , Glynn, A A Are the Lsh and Ity disease resistance genes at one locus on mouse chromosome 1 Nature 297, 510-51 1 (1982) 38 Price, R E , Templeton, J.W , Smith, R , III, Adams, L G Ability of mononuclear phagocytes from cattle naturally resistant or susceptible to brucellosis to control in vitro intracellular survival of Brucella abortus. Infect. Immun. 58, 879-886(1990) 39 Qureshi, T , Templeton, J W , and Adams, L G. Intracellular survival of Brucella abortus, Mycobacterium bovis (BCG), Salmonella dublin and Salmonella typhimurium in macrophages from cattle genetically resistant to Brucella abortus Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 50 55-66 (1996) 40 Radzioch, D, Hudson, T , Boule, M , Barrera, L , Urbance, J W , Varesio, L , et al. Genetic resistance/susceptibility to mycobacteria phenotypic expression in bone marrow derived macrophage lines J. Leukoc. Bio. 50, 263-272 (1991) 41 Roach, T I A , Chatterjee, D , Blackwell, J M Induction of early-response genes KC and JE by mycobacterial lipoarabinomannans Regulation of KC expression in muπne macrophages by Lsh/Ity/Bcg (Candidate Nramp) Infect, lmmun. 62, 1 176- 1 184 ( 1994) 42 Roach, T I A , Kiderlen, A F , Blackwell, J M Role of inorganic nitrogen oxides and tumor necrosis factor alpha in killing Leishmania donovam amastigotes in gamma lnterferon- lipopolysaccharide-activated macrophages from Lsh 5 and LsH congenic mouse strains Infect. Immun. 59, 3935-3944 (1991) 43 Sanger, F , Nicklen, S , Coulson, A R DNA sequencing with chain termination inhibitors Proc. Natl. Acad. Set. USA 74, 5463-5467 (1977) 44 Schurr, E , Malo, D , Radzioch, D , Buschman, E , Morgan, K , Gros, P , et al. Genetic control of innate resistance to mycobactenal infections Immunol. Today 12, A42-A45 (1991) 45 Skamene, E , Gros, P , Forget, A , Patel, P J Nesbitt, M N Regulation of resistance to leprosy by chromosome 1 locus in the mouse Immunogenetics 19, 1 17-124 (1984) 46 Skow, L C , Adkinson, L , Womack, J E , Beamer, W G , Taylor, B A Mapping of the mouse fibronectin gene (Fn-1) to chromosome 1 conservation of the Idh-l-Cryg-Fn-1 synteny group in mammals Genomics 1, 283-286 (1987) 47 Templeton, J W , Adams, L G in Advances m Brucellosis Research, (ed Adams, L.G ) 144- 150 (Texas A&M University Press, College Station, 1990) 48 Templeton, J W and L G Adams Genetics of natural resistance to tuberculosis, p 29-32 In F Griffin and G de Lisle (eds ), Tuberculosis in Wildlife and Domestic Animals University of Otago, Dunnedin, New Zealand (1996) 49 Templeton, J W , Estes, D M , Price, R E , Smith, R , III, Adams, L G Immunogenetics of natural resistance to bovine brucellosis 4th Worid Cong. Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 396-399 (1990) 50 Templeton, J W , Smith, R III, Adams, L G Natural disease resistance in domestic animals J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 192, 1306-1315(1988) 51 Tietjen, M and D Y Fung, Salmonellae and food safety Crit Rev Microbiol 21 53-83 (1995) 52 Vanderzant, Carl (Chairman), Subcommittee on Microbiological Criteria, Committee on Food Production, Food and Nutrition Board, National Research Council, An Evaluation of the Role of -Microbiological Criteria for Foods and Food Ingredients National Academy Press, Washington, D C 436 (1985) 53 Vidal, S M , Malo, D , Vogan, K , Skamene, E , Gros, P Natural resistance to infection with intracellular parasites isolation of a candidate for Beg. Cell 73, 469-485 ( 1993) 54 White, J K., Shaw, M A , Barton, C H , Cerretti, D P , Williams, H , Mock, B A , et al. Genetic and physical mapping 2q35 in the region of the NRAMP and IL8R genes Identification of a polymorphic repeat in the exon 2 of NRAMP Genomics 24, 295-302 (1994) 55 Womack, J E Chromosomal evolution from the perspective of the bovine gene map Anim. Biotech. 5, 123-128 (1994) 56 Womack, J E , Moll, Y D Gene map of the cow conservation of linkage with mouse and man J. ered. 77, 2-7 (1986) 57 Yu, H Chen, J.K , Feng, S , Dalgarno, D C , Brauer, A W , Schreiber, S L Structural basis for the binding of proline-rich peptides to SH3 domains Cell 76, 933-945 (1994) Because many varying and different embodiments may be made within the scope of the inventive concept herein taught, and because many modifications may be made in the embodiments herein detailed in accordance with the descπptive requirement of the law, it is to be understood that the details herein are to be interpreted as illustrative and not m a limiting sense What is claimed as invention is SEQUENCE LISTING [I) GENERAL INFORMATION: (i) APPLICANTS: Joe W. Templeton, Jianwei Feng, L. Garry Adams, Erwin Schurr, Philippe Gros, Donald S. Davis and Roger Smith (li) TITLE OF INVENTION: METHOD OF IDENTIFICATION OF ANIMALS RESISTANT OR SUSCEPTIBLE TO DISEASES SUCH AS RUMINANT BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS, PARATUBERCULOSIS AND SALMONELLOSIS (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 31 (iv) CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: (A) ADDRESSEE: Pravel, Hewitt, Kimball & Krieger (B) STREET: 1177 West Loop South, 10th Floor (C) CITY: Houston (D) STATE: TX (E) COUNTRY: USA (F) ZIP: 77027-9095 (v) COMPUTER READABLE FORM: (A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk (B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS (D) SOFTWARE: PatentIn Release #1.0, Version #1.25 (vi) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: (B) FILING DATE: (C) CLASSIFICATION: (vii) PRIOR APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: PROVISIONAL APPLICATION NUMBER 60/031,443 (B) FILING DATE: September 20, 1996 (viii) ATTORNEY/AGENT INFORMATION: (A) NAME: Krieger, Paul E. (B) REGISTRATION NUMBER: 25,886 (C) REFERENCE/DOCKET NUMBER: 00162-3/V96171US (ix) TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION: (A) TELEPHONE: 713-850-0909 (B) TELEFAX: 713-850-0165 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 1 (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 20 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 1 : AAGGCAGCAA GACAGACAGG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 2 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 19 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 2: ATGGAACTCA CGTTGGCTG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 3 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 20 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 3 : TCTCTGGCTG AAGGCTCTCC (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:4: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 20 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 4 : CCAAGCTCAC CTTAGGGTAG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 5 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 19 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 5 : CGTGGTGACA GGCAAGGAC (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 6 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 25 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 6: CCAAGAAGAG GAAGAAGAAG GTGTC (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 7 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 547 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acids (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 7 : Met Thr Gly Asp Lys Gly Pro Gin Arg Leu Ser Gly 5 10 Ser Ser Tyr Gly Ser lie Ser Ser Pro Thr Ser Pro 15 20 Gly Pro Gin Gin Ala Pro Pro Arg Glu Thr Tyr Leu 25 30 35 Ser Glu Lys lie Pro lie Pro Asp Thr Lys Pro Gly 40 45 Thr Phe Ser Leu Arg Lys Leu Trp Ala Phe Thr Gly 50 55 60 3 / Pro Gly Phe Leu Met Ser He Ala Phe Leu Asp Pro 65 70 Gly Asn He Glu Ser Asp Leu Gin Ala Gly Ala Val 75 80 Ala Gly Phe Lys Leu Leu Trp Val Leu Leu Trp Ala 85 90 95 Thr Val Leu Gly Leu Leu Cys Gin Arg Leu Ala Ala 100 105 Arg Leu Gly Val Val Thr Gly Lys Asp Leu Gly Glu 110 115 120 Val Cys His Cys Tyr Tyr Pro Lys Val Pro Arg Thr 125 130 Val Leu Trp Leu Thr He Glu Leu Ala He Val Gly 135 140 Ser Asp Met Gin Glu Val He Gly Thr Ala He Ala 145 150 155 Phe Asn Leu Leu Ser Ala Gly Arg He Pro Leu Trp 160 165 Gly Gly Val Leu He Thr He Val Asp Thr Phe Phe 170 175 180 Phe Leu Phe Leu Asp Asn Tyr Gly Leu Arg Lys Leu 185 190 Glu Ala Phe Phe Gly Leu Leu He Thr He Met Ala 195 200 Leu Thr Phe Gly Tyr Glu Tyr Val Val Ala Arg Pro 205 210 215 Glu Gin Gly Ala Leu Leu Arg Gly Leu Phe Leu Pro 220 225 Ser Cys Pro Gly Cys Gly His Pro Glu Leu Leu Gin 230 235 240 Ala Val Gly He Val Gly Ala He He Met Pro His 245 250 Asn He Tyr Leu His Ser Ala Leu Val Lys Ser Arg 255 260 Glu He Asp Arg Ala Arg Arg Ala Asp He Arg Glu 265 270 275 Ala Asn Met Tyr Phe Leu He Glu Ala Thr He Ala 280 285 3 Leu Ser Val Ser Phe He He Asn Leu Phe Val Met 290 295 300 Ala Val Phe Gly Gin Ala Phe Tyr Gin Lys Thr Asn 305 310 Gin Ala Ala Phe Asn He Cys Ala Asn Ser Ser Leu 315 320 His Asp Tyr Ala Lys He Phe Pro Met Asn Asn Ala 325 330 335 Thr Val Ala Val Asp He Tyr Gin Gly Gly Val He 340 345 Leu Gly Cys Leu Phe Gly Pro Ala Ala Leu Tyr He 350 355 360 Trp Ala He Gly Leu Leu Ala Ala Gly Gin Ser Ser 365 370 Thr Met Thr Gly Thr Tyr Ala Gly Gin Phe Val Met 375 380 Glu Gly Phe Leu Arg Leu Arg Trp Ser Arg Phe Ala 385 390 395 Arg Val Leu Leu Thr Arg Ser Cys Ala He Leu Pro 400 405 Thr Val Leu Val Ala Val Phe Arg Asp Leu Arg Asp 410 415 420 Leu Ser Gly Leu Asn Asp Leu Leu Asn Val Leu Gin 425 430 Ser Leu Leu Leu Pro Phe Ala Val Leu Pro He Leu 435 440 Thr Phe Thr Ser Met Pro Thr Leu Met Gin Glu Phe 445 450 455 Ala Asn Gly Leu Leu Asn Lys Val Val Thr Ser Ser 460 465 He Met Val Leu Val Cys Ala He Asn Leu Tyr Phe 470 475 480 Val Val Ser Tyr Leu Pro Ser Leu Pro His Pro Ala 485 490 Tyr Phe Gly Leu Ala Ala Leu Leu Ala Ala Ala Tyr 495 500 Leu Gly Leu Ser Thr Tyr Leu Val Trp Thr Cys Cys 5u5 510 515 Leu Ala His Gly Ala Thr Pro Leu Ala His Ser Ser 520 525 His His His Phe Leu Tyr Gly Leu Leu Glu Glu Asp 530 535 540 Gin Lys Gly Glu Thr Ser Gly 545 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 8: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 548 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 8: Met He Ser Asp Lys Ser Pro Pro Arg Leu Ser Arg 5 10 Pro Ser Tyr Gly Ser He Ser Ser Leu Pro Gly Pro 15 20 Ala Pro Gin Pro Ala Pro Cys Arg Glu Thr Tyr Leu 25 30 35 Ser Glu Lys He Pro He Pro Ser Ala Asp Gin Gly 40 45 Thr Phe Ser Leu Arg Lys Leu Trp Ala Phe Thr Gly 50 55 60 Pro Gly Phe Leu Met Ser He Ala Phe Leu Asp Pro 65 70 Gly Asn He Glu Ser Asp Leu Gin Ala Gly Ala Val 75 80 Ala Gly Phe Lys Leu Leu Trp Val Leu Leu Trp Ala 85 90 95 Thr Val Leu Gly Leu Leu Cys Gin Arg Leu Ala Ala 100 105 Arg Leu Gly Val Val Thr Gly Lys Asp Leu Gly Glu 110 115 120 Val Cys His Leu Tyr Tyr Pro Lys Val Pro Arg He 125 130 37 Leu Leu Trp Leu Thr He Glu Leu Ala He Val Gly 135 140 Ser Asp Met Gin Glu Val He Gly Thr Ala He Ser 145 150 155 Phe Asn Leu Leu Ser Ala Gly Arg He Pro Leu Trp 160 165 Gly Gly Val Leu He Thr He Val Asp Thr Phe Phe 170 175 180 Phe Leu Phe Leu Asp Asn Tyr Gly Leu Arg Lys Leu 185 190 Glu Ala Phe Phe Gly Leu Leu He Thr He Met Ala 195 200 Leu Thr Phe Gly Tyr Glu Tyr Val Val Ala His Pro 205 210 215 Ser Gin Gly Ala Leu Leu Lys Gly Leu Val Leu Pro 220 225 Thr Cys Pro Gly Cys Gly Gin Pro Glu Leu Leu Gin 230 235 240 Ala Val Gly He Val Gly Ala He He Met Pro His 245 250 Asn He Tyr Leu His Ser Ala Leu Val Lys Ser Arg 255 260 Glu Val Asp Arg Thr Arg Arg Val Asp Val Arg Glu 265 270 275 Ala Asn Met Tyr Phe Leu He Glu Ala Thr He Ala 280 285 Leu Ser Val Ser Phe He He Asn Leu Phe Val Met 290 295 300 Ala Val Phe Gly Gin Ala Phe Tyr Gin Gin Thr Asn 305 310 Glu Glu Ala Phe Asn He Cys Ala Asn Ser Ser Leu 315 320 Gin Asn Tyr Ala Lys He Phe Pro Arg Asp Asn Asn 325 330 335 Thr Val Ser Val Asp He Tyr Gin Gly Gly Val He 340 345 Leu Gly Cys Leu Phe Gly Pro Ala Ala Leu Tyr He 350 355 360 3 ~ Trp Ala Val Gly Leu Leu Ala Ala Gly Gin Ser Ser 365 370 Thr Met Thr Gly Thr Tyr Ala Gly Gin Phe Val Met 375 380 Glu Gly Phe Leu Lys Leu Arg Trp Ser Arg Phe Ala 385 390 395 Arg Val Leu Leu Thr Arg Ser Cys Ala He Leu Pro 400 405 Thr Val Leu Val Ala Val Phe Arg Asp Leu Lys Asp 410 415 420 Leu Ser Gly Leu Asn Asp Leu Leu Asn Val Leu Gin 425 430 Ser Leu Leu Leu Pro Phe Ala Val Leu Pro He Leu 435 440 Thr Phe Thr Ser Met Pro Ala Val Met Gin Glu Phe 445 450 455 Ala Asn Gly Arg Met Ser Lys Ala He Thr Ser Cys 460 465 He Met Ala Leu Val Cys Ala He Asn Leu Tyr Phe 470 475 480 Val He Ser Tyr Leu Pro Ser Leu Pro His Pro Ala 485 490 Tyr Phe Gly Leu Val Ala Leu Phe Ala He Gly Tyr 495 500 Leu Gly Leu Thr Ala Tyr Leu Ala Trp Thr Cys Cys 505 510 515 He Ala His Gly Ala Thr Phe Leu Thr His Ser Ser 520 525 His Lys His Phe Leu Tyr Gly Leu Pro Asn Glu Glu 530 535 540 Gin Gly Gly Val Gin Gly Ser Gly 545 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 9 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: 3 (A) LENGTH: 548 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 9 : Met Ser Gly Asp Thr Gly Pro Pro Lys Gin Gly Gly 5 10 Thr Arg Tyr Gly Ser He Ser Ser Pro Pro Ser Pro 15 20 Glu Pro Gin Gin Ala Pro Pro Gly Gly Thr Tyr Leu 25 30 35 Ser Glu Lys He Pro He Pro Asp Thr Glu Ser Gly 40 45 Thr Phe Ser Leu Arg Lys Leu Trp Ala Phe Thr Gly 50 55 60 Pro Gly Phe Leu Met Ser He Ala Phe Leu Asp Pro 65 70 Gly Asn He Glu Ser Asp Leu Gin Ala Gly Ala Val 75 80 Ala Gly Phe Lys Leu Leu Trp Val Leu Leu Trp Ala 85 90 95 Thr Val Leu Gly Leu Leu Cys Gin Arg Leu Ala Ala 100 105 Arg Leu Gly Val Val Thr Gly Lys Asp Leu Gly Glu 110 115 120 Val Cys His Leu Tyr Tyr Pro Lys Val Pro Arg He 125 130 Leu Leu Trp Leu Thr He Glu Leu Ala He Val Gly 135 140 Ser Asp Met Gin Glu Val He Gly Thr Ala He Ala 145 150 155 Phe Ser Leu Leu Ser Ala Gly Arg He Pro Leu Trp 160 165 Gly Gly Val Leu He Thr Val Val Asp Thr Phe Phe 170 . 175 180 Phe Leu Phe Leu Asp Asn Tyr Gly Leu Arg Lys Leu 185 190 ? Glu Ala Phe Phe Gly Phe Leu He Thr He Met Ala 195 200 Leu Thr Phe Gly Tyr Glu Tyr Val Val Ala Gin Pro 205 210 215 Ala Gin Gly Ala Leu Leu Gin Gly Leu Phe Leu Pro 220 225 Ser Cys Pro Gly Cys Gly Gin Pro Glu Leu Leu Gin 230 235 240 Ala Val Gly He He Gly Ala He He Met Pro His 245 250 Asn He Tyr Leu His Ser Ser Leu Val Lys Ser Arg 255 260 Glu Val Asp Arg Ser Arg Arg Ala Asp He Arg Glu 265 270 275 Ala Asn Met Tyr Phe Leu He Glu Ala Thr He Ala 280 285 Leu Ser Val Ser Phe Leu He Asn Leu Phe Val Met 290 295 300 Ala Val Phe Gly Gin Ala Phe Tyr Lys Gin Thr Asn 305 310 Gin Ala Ala Phe Asn He Cys Ala Asp Ser Ser Leu 315 320 His Asp Tyr Ala Pro He Phe Pro Arg Asn Asn Leu 325 330 335 Thr Val Ala Val Asp He Tyr Gin Gly Gly Val He 340 345 Leu Gly Cys Leu Phe Gly Pro Pro Ala Leu Tyr He 350 355 360 Trp Ala Val Gly Leu Leu Ala Ala Gly Gin Ser Ser 365 370 Thr Met Thr Gly Thr Tyr Ala Gly Gin Phe Val Met 375 380 Glu Gly Phe Leu Lys Leu Arg Trp Ser Arg Phe Ala 385 390 395 Arg Val Leu Leu Thr Arg Ser Cys Ala He Leu Pro 400 405 Thr Val Leu Leu Ala Val Phe Arg Asp Leu Arg Asp 410 415 420 3 Leu Ser Gly Leu Asn Asp Leu Leu Asn Val Leu Gin 425 430 Ser Leu Leu Leu Pro Phe Ala Val Leu Pro He Leu 435 440 Thr Phe Thr Ser Met Pro Ala Leu Met Gin Glu Phe 445 450 455 Ala Asn Gly Leu Val Ser Lys Val He Thr Ser Ser 460 465 He Met Val Leu Val Cys Ala Val Asn Leu Tyr Phe 470 475 480 Val He Ser Tyr Leu Pro Ser Leu Pro His Pro Ala 485 490 Tyr Phe Ser Leu Val Ala Leu Leu Ala Ala Ala Tyr 495 500 Leu Gly Leu Thr Thr Tyr Leu Val Trp Thr Cys Leu 505 510 515 He Thr Gin Gly Ala Thr Leu Leu Ala His Ser Ser 520 525 His Gin Arg Phe Leu Tyr Gly Leu Pro Glu Glu Asp 530 535 540 Gin Glu Lys Gly Arg Thr Ser Gly 545 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 10: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 2271 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 10: GCTTGCCATG CCCGTGAGGG GCTGCCCGGC ACGCCAGCCA CTCGCACAGA 50 GAGTGCCCGA GCCTGCGGTC CTCATGTCAG GTGACACGGG CCCCCCAAAG 100 CAGGGAGGGA CCAGATATGG CTCCATCTCC AGCCCACCCA GTCCAGAGCC 150 ACAGCAAGCA CCTCCCGGAG GGACCTACCT AAGTGAGAAG ATCCCCATTC 200 3 *1 CGGATACAGA ATCGGGTACA TTCAGCCTGA GGAAGCTGTG GGCCTTCACG 250 GGGCCTGGAT TCCTCATGAG CATCGCATTC CTGGACCCAG GAAACATTGA 300 GTCGGATCTT CAGGCTGGGG CTGTGGCTGG ATTCAAACTG CTCTGGGTGC 350 TGCTGTGGGC CACAGTGTTG GGCTTGCTTT GCCAGCGACT GGCTGCCCGG 400 CTGGGCGTGG TGACAGGCAA GGACTTGGGC GAGGTCTGCC ATCTCTACTA 450 CCCTAAGGTG CCCCGCATTC TCCTCTGGCT GACCATCGAG CTAGCCATCG 500 TGGGCTCAGA CATGCAGGAA GTCATTGGCA CAGCTATTGC ATTCAGTCTG 550 CTCTCCGCCG GACGAATCCC ACTCTGGGGT GGTGTCCTCA TCACCGTCGT 600 GGACACTTTC TTCTTCCTCT TCCTCGATAA CTACGGGTTG CGGAAGCTGG 650 AAGCCTTTTT TGGATTTCTT ATTACCATAA TGGCCTTGAC CTTCGGCTAT 700 GAGTACGTGG TGGCTCAGCC TGCTCAGGGA GCATTGCTTC AGGGCCTGTT 750 CCTGCCCTCG TGCCCAGGCT GTGGCCAGCC CGAGCTGCTG CAAGCCGTGG 800 GCATCATTGG CGCCATCATC ATGCCCCACA ACATCTACCT GCATTCCTCC 850 CTGGTCAAGT CTCGAGAGGT AGACCGGTCC CGGCGGGCGG ACATCCGAGA 900 GGCCAACATG TACTTCCTGA TTGAAGCCAC CATCGCCCTG TCTGTCTCCT 950 TCCTCATCAA CCTGTTTGTC ATGGCTGTCT TTGGGCAAGC CTTCTACAAG 1000 CAAACCAACC AGGCTGCGTT CAACATCTGT GCCGACAGCA GCCTCCACGA 1050 CTACGCGCCG ATCTTTCCCA GGAACAACCT GACCGTGGCA GTGGACATTT 1100 ACCAAGGAGG CGTGATCCTG GGCTGCCTCT TTGGTCCTCC AGCCCTGTAC 1150 ATCTGGGCCG TGGGTCTCCT GGCTGCTGGG CAGAGCTCCA CCATGACCGG 1200 CACCTACGCG GGACAGTTTG TGATGGAGGG CTTCCTGAAG CTGCGGTGGT 1250 CACGCTTCGC CCGAGTCCTG CTCACTCGCT CCTGCGCCAT CCTGCCCACT 1300 GTGCTCCTGG CTGTCTTCAG GGACTTGCGG GACCTGTCAG GCCTCAACGA 1350 CCTGCTCAAT GTGCTGCAGA GCCTGCTGCT TCCCTTCGCT GTGCTGCCCA 1400 TCCTCACCTT CACCAGCATG CCCGCCCTGA TGCAGGAGTT TGCCAATGGC 1450 CTGGTGAGCA AAGTTATCAC TTCCTCCATC ATGGTGCTGG TCTGCGCCGT 1500 CAACCTTTAC TTCGTGATCA GCTACTTGCC CAGCCTCCCC CACCCTGCCT 1550 ACTTCAGCCT TGTAGCACTG CTGGCCGCAG CCTACCTGGG CCTCACCACT 1600 VO TACCTGGTCT GGACCTGTCT CATCACCCAG GGAGCCACTC TTCTGGCCCA 1650 CAGTTCCCAC CAACGCTTCC TGTATGGGCT TCCTGAAGAG GATCAGGAGA 1700 AGGGGAGGAC CTCGGGATGA GCTCCCACCA GGGCCTGGCC ACGGGTGGAA 1750 TGAGTGGGCA CAGTGGCCTG TCAGACAAGG GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT 1800 GTGTATGTGT GTGAAGGCAG CAAGACAGAC AGGGAGTTCT GGAAGCTGGC 1850 CAACGTGAGT TCCAGAGGGA CCTGTGTGTG TGTGACACAC TGGCCTGCCA 1900 GACAAGGGTG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGCATGCA CAGCAAGACG 1950 GAGAGGGAGT TCTGGAAGGC AGCCAACGTG AGTTCCATAG GGACCTGCTA 2000 TTTCCTAGCT CAGATCTCAG TGTTCTTGAC TATAAAATGG GGACACCTAC 2050 CTTGGAGTGG TTGTAAATAA GACACTTGAA CGCAGAGCCT AGCACTTCAG 2100 ATTTAAAAAC AAAAGAATCA TAATTCCAAA AGTTACTGAG CACTATCACA 2150 GGAGTGACCT GACAGACCCA CCCAGTCTAG GGTGGGACCC AGGCTCCAAA 2200 CTGATTTAAA ATAAGAGTCT GAAAATGCTA AATAAATGCT GTTGTGCTTA 2250 GTCCCCGAGA AAAAAAAAAA A 2271 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 11: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 155 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 11: GGGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTATGT GTGTGAAGGC AGCAAGACAG 50 ACAGGGAGTT CTGGAAGCTG GCCAACGTGA GTTCCAGAGG GACCTGTGTG 100 TGTGTGACAC ACTGGCCTGC CAGACAAGGG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG 150 TGTGT 155 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 12 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 155 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 12: GGGGGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT ATGTGTGTGA AGGCAGCAAG ACAGACAGGG 50 AGTTCTGGAA GCTGGCCAAC GTGAGTTCCA GAGGGACCTG TGTGTGTGTG 100 ACACACTGGC CTGCCAGACA AGGGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG 150 TGTGT 155 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 13: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 155 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 13: GGGGGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTATGTGTGT GAAGGCAGCA AGACAGACAG 50 GGAGTTCTGG AAGCTGGCCA ACGTGAGTTC CAGAGGGACC TGTGTGTGTG 100 TGACACACTG GCCTGCCAGA CAAGGGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG 150 TGTGT 155 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 14: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 155 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 14: GGGGGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTATGTGT GTGAAGGCAG CAAGACAGAC 50 AGGGAGTTCT GGAAGCTGGC CAACGTGAGT TCCAGAGGGA CCTGTGTGTG 100 TGTGACACAC TGGCCTGCCA GACAAGGGTG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG 150 TGTGT (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 15: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 155 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 15: GGGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTATGT GTGTNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNN 50 NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNGTGTG 100 TGTGTNNNNN NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG 150 TGTGT (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 16: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 449 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 16: TCCCACCAAC GCTTCCTGTA TGGGCTTCCT GAAGAGGATC AGGAGAAGGG 50 GAGGACCTCG GGATGAGCTC CCACCAGGGC CTGGCCACGG GTGGAATGAG 100 TGGGCACAGT GGCCTGTCAG ACAAGGGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT 150 ATGTGTGTGA AGGCAGCAAG ACAGACAGGG AGTTCTGGAA GCTGGCCAAC 200 GTGAGTTCCA GAGGGACCTG TGTGTGTGTG ACACACTGGC CTGCCAGACA 250 AGGGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG CATGCACAGC AAGACGGAGA 300 GGGAGTTCTG GAAGGCAGCC AACGTGAGTT CCATAGGGAC CTGCTATTTC 350 CTAGCTCAGA TCTCAGTGTT CTTGACTATA AAATGGGGAC ACCTACCTTG 400 GAGTGGTTGT AAATAAGACA CTTGAACGCA GAGCCTAGCA CTTCAGATT 449 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 17: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 443 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single 3 (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 17: TCCCACCAAC GCTTCCTGTA TGGGCTTCCT GAAGAGGATC AGGAGAAGGG 50 GAGGACCTCG GGATGAGCTC CCACCAGGGC CTGGCCACGG GTGGAATGAG 100 TGGGCACAGT GGCCTGTCAG ACAAGGGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT 150 GTGAAGGCAG CAAGACAGAC AGGGAGTTCT GGAAGCTGGC CAACGTGAGT 200 TCCAGAGGGA CCTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTC TGGCCTGCCA GACAAGGGTG 250 TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTA CAGCAAGACG GAGAGGGAGT 300 TCTGGAAGGC AGCCAACGTG AGTTCCATAG GGACCTGCTA TTTCCTAGCT 350 CAGATCTCAG TGTTCTTGAC TATAAAATGG GGACACCTAC CTTGGAGTGG 400 TTGTAAATAA GACACTTGAA CGCAGAGCCT AGCACTTCAG ATT 443 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 18: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 445 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 18: TCCCACCAAC GCTTCCTGTA TGGGCTTCCT GAAGAGGATC AGGAGAAGGG 50 GAGGACCTCG GGATGAGCTC CCACCAGGGC CTGGCCACGG GTGGGATGAG 100 TGGGCACAGT GGCCTGTCAG ACAAAGGGGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTAT 150 GTGTGCGAAG GCAGCAAGAC AGACAGGGAG TTCTGGAAGC TGGCCAACGT 200 GAGTTCCAGA GGGACCTGTG TGTGTGTGAC ACACTGGCCT GCCAGACAAA 250 GGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGCATG CACAGCAAGA CGGAGAGGGA 300 GTTCTGGAAG GCAGCCAACG TGAGTTCCAT AGGGACCTGC TATTTCCTAG 350 CTCAGATCTC AGTGTTCTTG ACTATAAAAT GGGGACACCC ACCTTGGAGT 400 GGTTGTTAAT AAGACACTTG AACGCAGAAC CTAGCACCTC AGATT 445 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 19: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 401 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 19: CACCAACGCT TCCTGTATGG GCTTCCTGGA GAGGATCAGG AGGAGGGGAG 50 GACCTCGGGA TGAACTCCCA CCAGGGCCTG GCCACGGGTG GGATGAGTGA 100 CCACAGTGGC CTGCCAGACA AGGGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG 150 TGTGTGCATG CACAGCAAGA TGGAGAGGGA GTTCACGGGT GGGATGAGTG 200 GGCACAGTGG CCTGCCAGAC AAGGGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGC ACGCACAGCA 250 AGATGGACAG GGAATTTTGG AAGCCGGCCA AGCCATAGGG ACCTGCTATT 300 TCCTAGCTCA GATCTCGGTA TTCTTGAGTA TTAAATGGGG ACACCTACCT 350 TGCAATGGTT GTAAATAAGA CACTTGAACG CAGAGCCTAG CACTTCAGAT 400 T (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 20: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 344 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 20: TCCCACCAAC GCTTCCTGTA TGGGCTTCCT GAAGAGGATC AGGAGAAGGG 50 GAGGACCTCA GGATGAGCTC CCACCAGGGC CTGGCCACGG GTGGAATGAG 100 TGGGCACAGT GGCCTGCCAG ACAAGGGTGT GTGTGTGTAT GTGTGTGTGT 150 GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGCGC GCTCACCCAC AACAAGACGG AGAGGGAGTT 200 CTGGAAGCCG GACAACGTGA GTTCCATAGG GACCTGCTGT TTCCTAGCTC 250 AGATCTCAGT GTTCTTGATT ATAAAATGGG GACACCTACC TTGCAACGGT 300 TGTAAATAAG ACACATTGGA ACGCAGAGGC TAGCACTTCA GATT 344 Y-S " (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 21: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 349 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 21: TCCCACCAAC GCTTCCTGTA TGGGCTTCCT GAAGAGGATC AGGGAGAATG 50 GGAGGACCTC AGGATGAGCT CCCACCAGGA CCCTGCCACG GGTGGGATGA 100 GTGGGCACAG TGGCCTGCCA GACAAGGGTG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG 150 TGTGTGTGTG CGCGCGCGCG CGCGAGCGCT CACACACAGC AAGACAGAGA 200 GGGAGTTCTG GAAGCCGGAC GACGTGAGTT CCATAGGGAC CTGCTGTTTC 250 CTAGCTCATT CTTCACTATA AAATGGGGAC ACCTACCTTG CAATGGTTGT 300 AAATAAGAGT AAATAAGACA CTTGAATGCA GAGCCTAGCA CTTCAGATT 349 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 22: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 348 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 22: TCCCACCAAC GCTTCCTGTA TGGGCTTCCT GAAGAGGATC AGGAGAATGG 50 GAGGACCTCG GGATGAGCTC CCACCAGGAC CCGGCCACGG GTGGGATGAG 100 TGGGCACAGT GGCCTGCCAG ACAAGGGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT 150 GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGCGCGC GCGCGCGCTC ACACACAGCA AGACAGAGAG 200 GGAGTTCTGG AAGCAGGACG ACGTGAGTTC CATAGGGACC TGCTGTTTCC 250 TAGCTCAGAT CTCAGTGTTC TTCACTATAA AATGGGGACA CCTACCTTGC 300 AATGGTTGTA AATAAGACAC TTGAATGCAG AGCCTAGCAC TTCAGATT 348 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 23: Y6 (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 344 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 23: TCCCACCAAC GCTTCCTGTA TGGGCTTCCT GAAGAGGATC AGGAGAATGG 50 GAGGACCTCG GGATGAGCTC CCACCAGGAC CCGGCCACGG GTGGGATGAG 100 TGGGCACAGT GGCCTGCCAG ACAAGGGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT 150 GTGTGTGTGT GCGCGCGCGC GCGCTCACAC ACAGCAAGAC AGAGAGGGAG 200 TTCCGGAAGC CGGACGACGT GAGTTCCATA GGGACCTGCT GTTTCCTAGC 250 TCAGATCTCA GTGTTCTTCA CTATAAAATG GGGACACCTA CCTTGCAATG 300 GTTGTAAATA AGACACTTGA ATGCAGAGCC TAGCACTTCA GATT 344 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:24: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 326 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 24: TCCCACCAAC GCTTCCTGTA TGGGCTTCCT GAAGAGGATC AGGAGAATGG 50 GAGGACCTCG GGATGAGCTC CCACCAGGGC CCGGCCACGG GTGGGATGAG 100 TGGGCACAGT GGCCTGCCAG ACAAGGGGGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGCACGC 150 GCGCGCTCAC ACACAGCAAG ACAGAGAGGG AGTTCTGGAA GCAGGACGAC 200 GTGAGTTCCA TAGGGACCTG CTGTTTCCTA GCTCAGATCT CAGTGTTCTT 250 CACTATAAAA TGGGGACACC TACCTTGCAA TGGTTGTAAA TAAGACACTT 300 GAACGCAGAG CCTAGCACTT CAGATT 326 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 25: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 308 base pairs 7? (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 25: TCCCACCAAC GCTTCCTGTA TGGGCTTCCT GAAGAGGATC AGGAGAGGGG 50 GAGGACCTCA GGATGAGCTC CCACCAGGGC CTGGCCACGG GTGGGATGAG 100 TGGGCACAGT GGCCTGCCAG ACAAGGGTGT GTGTGTGGTC ACCCACAGCA 150 AGACGGAGAG GGAGTTCTGG AAGCCGGACA ACGTGAGTTC CATAGGGACC 200 TGCTGTTTCC TAGCTCAGAT CTCAGTGTTC TTGACTATAA AATGGGGACA 250 CCTACCTTGC AATGGTTGTA AATAAGACAC TTGAACGCAG AGCCTAGCAC 300 TTCAGATT 308 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 26: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 308 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 26: TCCCACCAAC GCTTCCTGTA TGGGCTTCCT GAAGAGGATC AGGAGAGGGG 50 GAGGACCTCG GGATGAGCTC CCACCAGGGC CTGGCCACAG GTGGGATGAG 100 TGGGCACAGT GGCTTGCCAG ACAAGGGTGT GTGTGTGGTC ACCCACAGCA 150 AGACGGAGAG GGAGTTCTGG AAGCCGGACA ACGTGAGTTC CATAGGGACC 200 TGCTGTTTCC TAGCTCAGAT CTCAGTGTTC TTGACTATAA AATGGGGACA 250 CCTACCTTGC AATGGTTGTA AATAAGACAC TAGAACGCAG AGCCTAGCAC 300 TTCAGATT 308 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 27: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 329 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single HI? (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 27: TCCCACCAAC GCTTCCTGTA TGGGCTTCCT GGAGAGGATC AGGAGGAGGG 50 GAGGACCTCG GGATGAACTC CCACCAGGGC CCGGCCACGG GTGGGATGAG 100 TGACCACAGT GGCCTGCCAG ACAAGGGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT 150 GTCTGTGTGT GTGCGCGCGC ACACAGCAAG ATGGAGAGGG AATTCTGGAA 200 GCCGGCCAAG CCATAGGAGC CTGCTATTTC CTAGCTCAGA TCTTGGTATT 250 CTTGAGTATT AACTGGGGAC ACCTACCTTG CAATGGTTGT AAATAAGACA 300 CTTGAACGCA GAGCCTAGCA CTTCAGATT 329 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 28: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 548 amino acids (B) TYPE: peptide (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 28: Met Ser Gly Asp Thr Gly Pro Pro Lys Gin 5 10 Gly Gly Thr Arg Tyr Gly Ser He Ser Ser 15 20 Pro Pro Ser Pro Glu Pro Gin Gin Ala Pro 25 30 Pro Gly Gly Thr Tyr Leu Ser Glu Lys He 35 40 Pro He Pro Asp Thr Glu Ser Gly Thr Phe 45 50 Ser Leu Arg Lys Leu Trp Ala Phe Thr Gly 55 60 Pro Gly Phe Leu Met Ser He Ala Phe Leu 65 70 Asp Pro Gly Asn He Glu Ser Asp Leu Gin 75 80 Ala Gly Ala Val Ala Gly Phe Lys Leu Leu 85 90 Trp Val Leu Leu Trp Ala Thr Val Leu Gly 95 100 Leu Leu Cys Gin Arg Leu Ala Ala Arg Leu 105 110 Gly Val Val Thr Gly Lys Asp Leu Gly Glu 115 120 Val Cys His Leu Tyr Tyr Pro Lys Val Pro 125 130 Arg He Leu Leu Trp Leu Thr He Glu Leu 135 140 Ala He Val Gly Ser Asp Met Gin Glu Val 145 150 He Gly Thr Ala He Ala Phe Ser Leu Leu 155 160 Ser Ala Gly Arg He Pro Leu Trp Gly Gly 165 170 Val Leu He Thr He Val Asp Ala Phe Phe 175 180 Phe Leu Phe Leu Asp Asn Tyr Gly Leu Arg 185 190 Lys Leu Glu Ala Phe Phe Gly Phe Leu He 195 200 Thr He Met Ala Leu Thr Phe Gly Tyr Glu 205 210 Tyr Val Val Ala Gin Pro Ala Gin Gly Ala 215 220 Leu Leu Gin Gly Leu Phe Leu Pro Ser Cys 225 230 Pro Gly Cys Gly Gin Pro Glu Leu Leu Gin 235 240 Ala Val Gly He He Gly Ala He He Met 245 250 Pro His Asn He Tyr Leu His Ser Ser Leu 255 260 X 0 Val Lys Ser Arg Glu Val Asp Arg Ser Arg 265 270 Arg Ala Asp He Arg Glu Ala Asn Met Tyr 275 280 Phe Leu He Glu Ala Thr He Ala Leu Ser 285 290 Val Ser Phe Leu He Asn Leu Phe Val Met 295 300 Ala Val Phe Gly Gin Ala Phe Tyr Lys Gin 305 310 Thr Asn Gin Ala Ala Phe Asn He Cys Ala 315 320 Asn Ser Ser Leu Gin Asp Tyr Ala Pro He 325 330 Phe Pro Arg Asn Asn Leu Thr Val Ala Val 335 340 Asp He Tyr Gin Gly Gly Val He Leu Gly 345 350 Cys Leu Phe Gly Pro Ala Ala Leu Tyr He 355 360 Trp Ala Val Gly Leu Leu Ala Ala Gly Gin 365 370 Ser Ser Thr Met Thr Gly Thr Tyr Ala Gly 375 380 Gin Phe Val Met Glu Gly Phe Leu Lys Leu 385 390 Arg Trp Ser Arg Phe Ala Arg Val Leu Leu 395 400 Thr Arg Ser Cys Ala He Leu Pro Thr Val 405 410 Leu Leu Ala Val Phe Arg Asp Leu Arg Asp 415 420 Leu Ser Gly Leu Asn Asp Leu Leu Asn Val 425 430 Leu Gin Ser Leu Leu Leu Pro Phe Ala Val 435 440 Leu Pro He Leu Thr Phe Thr Ser Met Pro 445 450 JT/ Ala Leu Met Arg Glu Phe Ala Asn Gly Leu 455 460 Val Ser Lys Val He Thr Ser Ser He Met 465 470 Val Leu Val Cys Ala Val Asn Leu Tyr Phe 475 480 Val He Ser Tyr Val Pro Ser Leu Pro His 485 490 Pro Ala Tyr Phe Ser Leu Val Ala Leu Leu 495 500 Ala Ala Ala Tyr Leu Gly Leu Thr Thr Tyr 505 510 Leu Val Trp Thr Cys Leu He Thr Gin Gly 515 520 Ala Thr Leu Leu Ala His Ser Ser His Gin 525 530 Arg Phe Leu Tyr Gly Leu Pro Glu Glu Asp 535 540 Gin Glu Lys Gly Arg Thr Ser Gly 545 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 29: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 587 nucleotides (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 29: GGGCTTCCTG AAGAGGATCA GGAGAAGGGG AGGACCTCGG GGATGAGCTC 50 CCACCAGGGC CTGGCCACGG GTGGGATGAG TGGGCACAGT GGCCTGTCAG 100 ACAAGGGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGAAGGCAG CAAGACAGAG 150 ACGGAGTTCT GGAAGCTGGC CAACGTGAGT TCCAGAGGGA CCTGTGTGTG 200 TGTGTGTGAC ACACTGGCCT GCCAGACAAG GGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG 250 TGTGTGTGTG TGTGCATGCA CAGCAAGACA GAGAGGGAGT TCTGGAAGCC 300 AGCCAACGTG AGTTCCATAG GGACCTGCTA TTTCCTAGCT CAGATCTCAG 350 TGTTCTTGAC TATAAAATGG GGACACCTAC CTTGGAATGG TTGTAAATAA 400 GACACTTGAA CGCAGAGCCT AGCACTTCAG ATTTAAAAAC AAAAGAATCA 450 TAATTCCAAA AGTTACTGAG CACTATCACA GGAGTGACCT GACAGACCCA 500 CCCAGTCCAG GGTGGGACCC AGGCTCCAAA CTGATTTAAA ATAAGAGTCT 550 GAAAATGCTA AATAAATGCT GTTGTGCTTA GTCCCCG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 30: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS : (A) LENGTH: 585 nucleotides (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 30: GGGCTTCCTG AAGAGGATCA GGAGAAGGGG AGGACCTCGG GGATGAGCTC 50 CCACCAGGGC CTGGCCACGG GTGGGATGAG TGGGCACAGT GGCCTGTCAG 100 ACAAGGGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT GAAGGCAGCA AGACAGAGAC 150 GGAGTTCTGG AAGCTGGCCA ACGTGAGTTC CAGAGGGACC TGTGTGTGTG 200 TGTGTGACAC ACTGGCCTGC CAGACAAGGG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG 250 TGTGTGTGTG TGCATGCACA GCAAGACAGA GAGGGAGTTC TGGAAGCCAG 300 CCAACGTGAG TTCCATAGGG ACCTGCTATT TCCTAGCTCA GATCTCAGTG 350 TTCTTGACTA TAAAATGGGG ACACCTACCT TGGAATGGTT GTAAATAAGA 400 CACTTGAACG CAGAGCCTAG CACTTCAGAT TTAAAAACAA AAGAATCATA 450 ATTCCAAAAG TTACTGAGCA CTATCACAGG AGTGACCTGA CAGACCCACC 500 CAGTCCAGGG TGGGACCCAG GCTCCAAACT GATTTAAAAT AAGAGTCTGA 550 AAATGCTAAA TAAATGCTGT TGTGCTTAGT CCCCG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 31: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 149 nucleotides (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear 3 (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:31: GTGTGTGTGT GTGTGTGTGT ATGTGTGTNN NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNN 50 NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNG TGTGTGTGTN 100 NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNN NNNGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGTG TGTGTGTGT 149 -b

Claims: CLAIMS; 1. A method for screening animals for resistance or susceptibility to disease comprising the steps of: analyzing an animal's genetic material for the presence of one or more specific genetic sequences associated with bovine Nrampl which sequences associate with susceptibility or resistance of an animal to disease caused by intracellular parasites. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the disease caused by intracellular parasites is selected from the group consisting of artiodactyla brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. 3 The method of claim 1, wherein said disease caused by intracellular parasites is selected from the group consisting of ungulate brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said disease caused by intracellular parasites is selected from the group consisting of ruminant brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said animal is an artiodactyla. 6. The method of claim 5, wherein said artiodactyla is an ungulate 7. The method of claim 6, wherein said ungulate is a ruminant. 8. The method of claim 7, wherein said ruminant is selected from the group consisting of bovine, and bison. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein a specific genetic sequence that associates with bovine Nrampl which sequence associates with susceptibility of an animal to disease caused by intracellular parasites is selected from the sequence consisting of SEQ ID NOS. 12, 13, 14, and 30 S± " 10 The method of claim 1, wherein a specific genetic sequence that associates with bovine Nrampl which sequence associates with resistance of an animal to disease caused by intracellular parasites is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOS 1 1, 15, 29, and 31 11 The method of claim 1, wherein the animal's genetic material is analyzed by PCR for the presence of one or more specific genetic sequences associated with bovine Nrampl which sequences associate with susceptibility or resistance of an animal to disease caused by intracellular parasites 12 The method of claim 10, wherein the PCR utilizes at least one primer comprising a sequence selected from the group consisting of sequences identified by sequence identification numbers 1 and 2 13 The method of claim 1, wherein the animal's genetic material is analyzed in order to detect the presence of one or more specific genetic sequences associated with bovine Nrampl which sequences associate with susceptibility or resistance of an ammal to disease caused by intracellular parasites 14 The method of claim 1, wherein the animals' genetic material is analyzed by SSCP in order to determine the presence of one or more specific genetic sequences associated with NRAMPl which sequence associated with susceptibility and resistance of an animal to disease caused by intracellular parasites 15 A method for predicting the likelihood of an animal being susceptible to disease caused by intracellular parasites comprising. analyzing an animal's genetic material for the presence of genetic sequences selected from the group consisting of the sequences identified by sequence identification numbers 12-14, and 30 the presence of said sequence in situ being associated with susceptibility of an animal to disease caused by intracellular parasites 16 The method of claim 15, wherein said animal is an artiodactyla animal 17 The method of claim 16, wherein said artiodactyla animal is an ungulate animal 18 The method of claim 17, where said ungulate animal is a ruminant animal 19 The method of claim 18, wherein said ruminant animal is selected from the group consisting of bovine and bison 20 The method of claim 15, wherein said disease caused by intracellular parasites is selected from the group consisting of artiodactyla brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis 21 The method of claim 15, wherein said disease caused by intracellular parasites is selected from the group consisting of ungulate brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis 22 The method of claim 15, wherein said disease caused by intracellular parasites is selected from the group consisting of ruminant brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis 23 The method of claim 15, wherein said artiodactyla animal is an ungulate 24 The method of claim 15, wherein the animal's genetic mateπal is analyzed by PCR for the presence of the genetic sequence of bovine Nrampl 25 The method of claim 24, wherein the PCR utilizes at least one pnmer compnsing a sequence selected from the group consisting of the sequences identified by sequence identification numbers 1 and 2 26 The method of claim 15, wherein the animals genetic atenal is analyzed by SSCP for the presence of the genetic sequence of bovine NRAMPl 27 The method of claim 15, wherein the animals genetic mateπal is analyzed by SSCA for the presence of the genetic sequence of bovine NRAMPl s? 28 A method for predicting the likelihood of an animal being resistant to disease caused by intracellular parasites comprising. analyzing an animal's genetic material for the presence of a genetic sequence of bovine Nrampl selected from the group consisting of the sequences identified by sequence identification number 1 1, 15, 29 and 31, the presence of said sequence in situ being associated with resistance of an animal to disease caused by intracellular parasites. 29 The method of claim 28, wherein said animal is an artiodactyla animal. 30. The method of claim 29, wherein said artiodactyla animal is an ungulate animal. 31. The method of claim 30, where said ungulate animal is a ruminant animal. 32. The method of claim 31, wherein said ruminant animal is selected from the group consisting of bovine and bison. 33. The method of claim 28, wherein said disease caused by intracellular parasites is selected from the group consisting of artiodactyla brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. 34. The method of claim 28, wherein said disease caused by intracellular parasites is selected from the group consisting of ungulate brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis. 35. The method of claim 28, wherein said disease caused by intracellular parasites is selected from the group consisting of ruminant brucellosis, tuberculosis, paratuberculosis and salmonellosis 36. The method of claim 28, wherein said animal is an artiodactyla animal. 37. The method of claim 36, wherein said artiodactyla animal is an ungulate. sS 38 The method of claim 28, wherein the animal's genetic material is analyzed by PCR for the presence of the genetic sequence of bovine Nrampl. 39 The method of claim 38, wherein the PCR utilizes at least one primer comprising a sequence selected from the group consisting of the sequences identified by sequence identification numbers 1 and 2. 40 The method of claim 28, wherein the animals genetic material is analyzed by SSCP for the presence of the genetic sequence of bovine NRAMPl 41 The method of claim 28, wherein the animals genetic material is analyzed by SSCA for the presence of the genetic sequence of bovine NRAMPl ' 1

Inventors: ADAMS L GARRY, DAVIS DONALD S, FENG JIANWEI, GROS PHILIPPE, SCHURR ERWIN, SMITH ROGER, TEMPLETON JOE W, ADAMS, L., GARRY, DAVIS, DONALD, S., FENG, JIANWEI, GROS, PHILIPPE, SCHURR, ERWIN, SMITH, ROGER, TEMPLETON, JOE, W.
Applicants: ADAMS L GARRY, DAVIS DONALD S, FENG JIANWEI, GROS PHILIPPE, SCHURR ERWIN, SMITH ROGER, TEMPLETON JOE W, TEXAS A & M UNIV SYS, UNIV MCGILL, ADAMS, L., GARRY, DAVIS, DONALD, S., FENG, JIANWEI, GROS, PHILIPPE, MCGILL UNIVERSITY, SCHURR, ERWIN, SMITH, ROGER, TEMPLETON, JOE, W., THE TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
Application year: 1997
Main classification: C12Q1
IPC codes: C12Q1