Detergent composition

Abstract: Detergent compositions comprising aminodicarboxylic acid-N,N-dialkanoic acid or its salt (component A) and a synthetic surface active agent having microbial degradability (component B). In particular, in the case where an alkali salt of polyoxyalkylene alkylether acetic acid or alkyl polyglycoside is used as the surface active agent (component B), the detergent compositions exhibit excellent washing effect without forming metallic soap even in washing water with high hardness, and also show high solubility even under the condition of low water temperature, and have excellent microbial degradability. Thus, the detergent compositions are particularly suitable for washing fabrics. Further, in the case where synthetic anionic and/or nonionic surface active agent is used as the surface active agent (component B), influence of corrosion to light metals is small. Accordingly, the detergent compositions are suitable for washing light metals, and also they have excellent foaming property and therefore can be applied to foam cleaning.

Description: FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a detergent composition containing a specific aminodicarboxylic acid-N,N-dialkanoic acid or its salt, and a synthetic surface active agent. More particularly, it relates to a detergent composition which does not form metallic soap in washing water with high hardness, and exhibits high solubility even in water with low temperature, leading to an excellent washing performance, and, which moreover, is excellent in biodegradability (microbial degradability), and, furthermore, is particularly suitable for washing clothes. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In recent years, environmental protection has strongly been advocated, and microbial degradability of both synthetic surface active agents and builders which are used for washing, and also eutrophication by phosphorus compounds has been taken up as social problems. Therefore, there is a tendency recently that cleaning agents for clothes change from synthetic detergents to soap compositions. Soap compositions have excellent microbial degradability. But though they show excellent washing effect when they are put in water with good quality and relatively high temperature, they are likely to be influenced by the hardness or the temperature of washing water. Namely, when water with high hardness or low temperature is used, metallic soap insoluble in water is formed, or soap compositions themselves become hard to dissolve in water and change to insoluble materials, resulting in decrease in washing effect. Those insoluble materials are deposited on fiber surfaces, e.g., when washing fabrics, and thus deposited materials are not removed even if rinsed with water, resulting in the deterioration of the finish after washing. This is the reason why the change from synthetic detergents to soap compositions is retarded. As a means of solving the problem involved in the above-described soap compositions, blending soap compositions with the chelating agent, such as an alkali salt of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and alumina silicate (zeolite) has conventionally been used. However, the said EDTA chelating agent is poor in microbial degradability and, as a result, a soap composition containing EDTA becomes also poor in microbial degradability. Moreover, the zeolite chelating agent has weak sequestration and, as a result, water-insoluble metallic soap is formed when a soap composition containing zeolite is used in water with high hardness. Furthermore, even if those chelating agents are contained in soap compositions, this fact does not improve solubility of the soap composition in water of low temperature, and thus the problem of water-insolubility remains unsolved. Recently, as the interest in protection of limited resources has increased, development and utilization of resources which can be reclaimed or recovered has become a new subject. In particular, regarding kitchen detergents, . a change from anionic surface active agent to a biodegradable nonionic surface active agent has been in progress. Since the raw material source of this nonionic surface active agent is a plant, it has excellent microbial degradability and is mild to skin, namely, less irritant to skin and, in addition, has excellent degreasing property. Therefore, the nonionic surface active agent is suitable for synthetic detergents for kitchen use, mainly for washing tablewares. However, when the nonionic surface active agent is used alone, washing effect as a synthetic detergent for fabrics is low. Therefore, for the purpose of raising the washing effect of this surface active agent, a mixture of a surface active agent and a builder compound has been used. Though phosphorus compounds have conventionally been used as the builder compound of this kind, the use of such compounds is a cause of unpreferable eutrophication and, therefore, a chelating agent showing calcium sequestration, such as alumina silicate (zeolite), high molecular carboxylate with polyacrylate being a representative example, nitrilotriacetate (NTA) and ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA) have been used instead in recent years. However, the alumina silicate is weak in sequestration and, as a result, a detergent using the alumina silicate greatly decreases its washing effect when used in water with high hardness. Moreover, the alumina silicate is water-insoluble. Therefore, when a detergent containing alumina silicate is drained off, the alumina silicate is deposited in sludge state on the bottoms of sewage treatment plants or the beds of rivers and others, which will cause a new environmental problem. The above-described high molecular carboxylates and ethylenediamine tetraacetate as a chelating agent have poor microbial degradability and, as a result, a synthetic detergent containing those chelating agents, such as high molecular carboxylate, is also poor in microbial degradability. Regarding nitrilotriacetate, though its microbial degradability is excellent and its environmental problem has been solved, it is regarded as a builder hard to employ, from the standpoints of safety and washing performance. Moreover, most surface active agents which have conventionally been used as the main component of the above-described known detergents use hydrocarbons derived from petroleum as raw material sources which can not be reclaimed or recovered. Therefore, if the importance of resource protection in future is taken into consideration, those surface active agents involve a big problem. EP-A-0 783 034 discloses a detergent comprising an amino carboxylic acid chelating agent which can be used for example as an industrial detergent for cleaning of clothing, dinnerware, plants, and bottles. WO 94/12606 discloses iminodiacetic acid derivatives used in cleaning compositions for hard metallic, plastic, lacquered or glass surfaces. OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION The object of the present invention is to provide a detergent composition which does not form metallic soap even in washing water with high hardness, and shows excellent washing effect with high solubility in water at low temperature, and has excellent microbial degradability, and improves disadvantages involved in the prior art, and is particularly suitable for washing fabrics. Another object of the present invention is to provide a detergent composition which can use reclaimable and recoverable plants as its raw material sources, and contributes to the protection of resources. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION As a result of an extensive investigation in view of the above problems, the present inventors have solved the above problems by providing a detergent composition comprising glutamic acid-N,N-diacetic acid or a salt thereof and a synthetic surface active agent. The present invention provides a detergent composition for washing fabrics according to claim 1. The dependent claims define preferred embodiments of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS Glutamic acid-N,N-diacetate (Al) which is used in the present invention is a compound represented by the following formula (3): This glutamic acid-N,N-diacetate is preferably L-glutamic acid-N,N-diacetate. In the above formula (3), each of M 1 independently represents an alkali ion, such as sodium and potassium, an amine salt, such as alkanol amine, or an ammonium salt. Among them, an alkali ion, particularly sodium ion, is preferred. This alkali salt of glutamic acid-N,N-diacetic acid is a derivative of glutamic acid which is an amino acid and is obtainable by the conventional production method. For example, it is synthesized as follows: Glutamic acid, and preferably L-glutamic acid which is-amino acid is synthesized by fermenting glucoses originated from plants, such as starch and saccharides, or by hydrolyzing proteins also originated from plants, such as wheat protein and soybean protein. Accordingly, glutamic acid can be synthesized from reclaimable or recoverable glucoses or proteins which are originated from plants as raw material sources. Succeedingly, glutamic acid obtained is cyanomethylated and then hydrolyzed under an alkali condition, thereby obtaining an alkali salt of glutamic acid-N,N-diacetic acid. An alkali salt of glutamic acid-N,N-diacetic acid obtained through the above process has excellent microbial degradability, and also has excellent calcium ion sequestration. In particular, this sequestration is considerably increased under a weak alkali condition of between pH 9 and 11. [Detergent composition for clothes] The surface active agent used in the detergent-composition of the present invention is an alkali salt of oxyalkylene or polyoxyalkylene alkylether acetic acid and/or alkylpolyglycoside. An alkali salt of polyoxyalkylene alkylether acetic acid (B1) is a compound represented by the following formula (4) and retains water solubility at low temperature and is completely decomposed by microorganisms in a short period of time. wherein R represents an alkyl group having the carbon number of between 6 and 20, preferably, between 10 and 18, and R 1 represents a hydrogen atom or a methyl group, and n which represents the additional mole number of ethylene oxide (R 1 being a hydrogen atom) or propylene oxide (R 1 being a methyl group) is between 1 and 6, preferably between 1 and 5. Especially when R 1 is a hydrogen atom, n is preferably between 1 and 5, and when R 1 is a methyl group, n is preferably between 1 and 3. In particular, when influences upon washing performance, water solubility and hardness of water, etc. are considered, ether carboxylic acid is preferred, wherein R is an alkyl group having the carbon number of between 10 and 14, and n, i.e., the additional mole number, of alkylene oxide is between 1 and 5 if R 1 is a hydrogen atom, and is between 1 and 3, if R 1 is a methyl group, and M 2 is sodium, potassium, or alkanol amine, preferably, being sodium especially. An alkali salt of polyoxyalkylene alkylether acetic acid may be used either alone or with other salt of the same acid. A representative example of this compound is sodium polyoxyethylene laurylether acetate. The representative commercially available product is Beaulight LH203 (being a trade name of a product of Sanyo Kasei K.K.). Alkyl polyglycoside (B2) which is other surface active agent used in the detergent composition mainly for washing fabrics in the present invention is selected from compounds represented by the following formula (5): R 2 O-Z 4 wherein R 2 represents an alkyl group having the carbon number of between 6 and 20, and Z 4 represents a polyglycosyl group having the hexose and/or pentose unit of between 1 and 3. A nonionic surface active agent represented by the following formula (6) is selected: wherein R 3 represents an alkyl group having the carbon number of 8 and 16, preferably, 10 and 14, and m, i.e., an average polymerization degree of polyglycoside, is between 1.2 and 1.8, preferably between 1.4 and 1.6. If the carbon number of the alkyl group is less than 8 and, at the same time, m exceeds 1.8, washing effect of the detergent composition is lowered. In addition, if the carbon number of the said group exceeds 16 and, at the same time, m is less than 1.2, water solubility of the detergent composition is lowered. The carbon number of the said R 3 is arbitrarily determined by taking into consideration conditions of some or all of cleaning performance, water solubility, compatibility in the presence of electrolytic ions, skin irritation, foaming ability, etc. and also the kind of detergent and the like. And followed by the above, the average polymerization degree is determined in turn. In particular, when the detergent composition is applied for washing fabrics, it is preferable that the carbon number of R 3 is determined in the range of between 8 and 16, and the average polymerization degree of polyglycoside is determined in the range between 1.4 and 1.6. Compounds like component (B2) have excellent degreasing performance and foaming ability in a wide range of pH, and have a high standard of safety on human bodies and low skin irritation, and are completely decomposed by microorganisms in a short period of time. For example, at the test using the activated sludge method, their COD decomposed rate showed 85% and more, after they were aerated for 7 days. In addition, they showed to have been nearly completely decomposed by HPLC analysis. Furthermore, under the anaerobic condition, they showed to have been biologically decomposed nearly 100%. Those compounds are synthesized, for example, from reclaimable or recoverable plants as a raw material source as follows: First, under the acidic condition, e.g., pH of between 3 and 4, glucose originated from plants, e.g., saccharide from plants, is glycosidated with a lower alcohol, e.g., n-butanol to form a lower alcohol glycoside (n-butanol glycoside), and, secondly, formed lower alcohol glycoside is then put under glycoside exchange with a long chain alcohol originated from plants, such as a natural alcohol which is a derivative of coconut or palm oil. Namely, the compound is synthesized by a two step reaction. In a detergent composition of the present invention, the blending amount of a surface active agent against 1 part by weight of a salt of glutamic acid-N,N-diacetic acid (A) is between 2 and 50 parts by weight, and preferably between 12 and 20 parts by weight if the said surface active agent is a salt of polyoxyethylene alkylether acetic acid (B1), and it is between 1/3 and 3 parts by weight, and preferably between 1/2 and 2 parts by weight if the said surface active agent is alkyl polyglycoside (B2). Further, when the mixture of the component (B1) and the component (B2) is used as the surface active agent, the total amount of the said two components against 1 part by weight of component (A) is between 1/3 and 50 parts by weight, and preferably between 1/2 and 20 parts by weight. The blending proportion thereof, i.e., (B1) : (B2) is between 20:80 and 80:20 (weight ratio). Within the range of these blending proportions, the present invention shows a remarkable effect. The detergent composition of the present invention for washing fabrics as described above may further contain, in addition to the said two components which are essential, alkali salts (buffer agent), such as sodium carbonate, sodium silicate and ethanol amine, in order to maintain the pH value of its solution in an alkali region, and, moreover, if required and necessary, the detergent composition may also contain either of or all of other surface active agents, bleaching agents, enzymes, fluorescent whitening agents, perfumes, solubilizing agents, etc. In addition, the detergent composition according to the present invention can be prepared either in a granular or liquid form. When at being put into practical use, the detergent composition is preferably diluted with water so that the concentration of an alkali salt of polyoxyethylene alkylether acetic acid (B1) or alkylpolyglycoside (B2) may be brought to the range of between 0.05 and 0.08% on solid basis. The above-described detergent composition of the present invention has excellent microbial degradability. For example, when the detergent composition is diluted with water to COD 500ppm, and then an activated sludge is added thereto, and the resulting mixture is aerated for 7 days, the decoposition rate becomes 85% and more (COD being less than 75 ppm). PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION The present invention is described in more detail by the following examples of embodiments, but it should not be understood that the invention is construed as being limited thereto. Unless otherwise indicated, % (percents) show % by weight. Compounds used in the following examples are outlined below: Sodium glutamic acid-N,N-diacetate: GLDA (A1) Sodium polyoxyethylene lauryl ether acetate: C 12 O(EO) n CH 2 COONa The above compound with 1 mole of EO: C 12 O(EO) 1 CH 2 COONa The above compound with 3 moles of EO: C 12 O(EO) 3 CH 2 COONa The above compound with 4.5 moles of EO: C 12 O(EO) 4.5 CH 2 COONa Alkyl polyglycoside: APG (B2) Sodium salt of laurylic acid (soap): C 12 Na Coco fatty acid dimethylamine oxide: AO (surface active agent) Sodium linear alkylbenezene sulfonate: LAS (surface active agent) Sodium ethylene diamine tetraacetate: EDTA Sodium tripolyphosphate: STPP Sodium carbonate: Carbonate Sodium metasilicate: Silicate Sodium salt of beef tallow fatty acid : Soap Carboxymethyl cellulose: CMC Sodium sulfate: Sulfate Triethanol amine: TEA Of the above compounds, GLDA which was obtained by fermenting saccharides originated from plants to synthesize L-glutamic acid, and then by cycanomethylating the said L-glutamic acid, followed by hydrolyzing the resulting product under an alkali condition is used. Components B1-1, B1-3 and B1-4.5 which were prepared by neutralizing Beaulight LH201®, Beaulight LH203® and Beaulight LCA® (products of Sanyo Kasei Kogyo K.K.) respectively were used. As APG, GLUCOPON 600 CS UP® (GLUCOPON 600 CS UP : R 3 = C 12-14 , m=1.4; product of Henckel Corp.) was used. As EDTA, a compound synthesized by the conventional production method was used. As LAS, a synthetic detergent for fabric washing evaluation, sodium n-dodecylbenezenesulfonate was used. As far as STPP, silicate, carbonate, soap, CMC and sulfate are concerned, each of the reagents grade is used. EXAMPLE 1 Each sample (detergent) shown in Table 1 was prepared. Sample Nos. 1 through 5 and Sample No. 8 were diluted with each of water containing 60 ppm and 100 ppm of calcium carbonate so that the amount of the component (B1) became 0.08% in the solution. Sample Nos. 6 and 7 were diluted with each of water containing 60ppm and 100 ppm of calcium carbonate so that the amount of the component (B1) became 0.05%. and Sample Nos. 9 through 14 were diluted with each of water containing 60 ppm and 100 ppm of calcium carbonate so that the amount of the total components became 0.133%. The state of aqueous solution and the foaming ability of each sample thus prepared were observed. The results obtained are shown in Table 1. Aqueous solution of each sample was adjusted to pH 12 using an alkali buffer agent, and was observed at water temperature of 25 ° C. The foaming property test employed is to observe whether or not metallic soap is formed when each sample is dissolved in hard water. If foaming phenomenon is observed, it is construed that metallic soap is not formed and therefore washing effect of the sample is excellent. To the contrary, no foaming means that metallic soap is formed, and therefore washing effect of the sample is lowered. This foaming property test was conducted in such manner as 20 cc of the aqueous solution of the sample was filled in a 100 cc color comparison tube and then the filled tube was shaken up and down by hand and finally the foaming volume was compared. As is apparent from Table 1, Sample Nos. 9, 10 and 11 have conventional washing soap compositions, and were not completely dissolved at water temperature of 25° C, and foaming was not observed. Samples containing sodium polyoxyethylene lauryl ether acetate (C 12 (EO) n CH 2 COONa) with ethylene oxide addition mole number (n) of 1 mole, 3 moles and 4.5 moles (B1-1, B1-3 and B1-4.5 respectively) were all dissolved in water under the conditions that the calcium carbonate concentration was 60 ppm and water temperature was 25 ° C. However, in water under the conditions that calcium carbonate concentration was 100 ppm and GLDA was not present, insoluble salts were formed. (Sample Nos. 12, 13 and 14). Contrary to the above, when sodium polyoxyethylene lauryl ether acetate was used together with GLDA, formation of an insoluble substance was prevented even in water with 100 ppm of calcium carbonate and turbidity did not occur. Also, at that time, sufficient foaming was generated. This was well achieved particularly when the ratio of the component (B1) against the component (A1) is within the range of between 2 / 1 and 50 / 1. (Sample Nos. 1 through 8). EXAMPLE 2 Each sample (detergent composition) shown in Table 2 was prepared. Sample Nos. 15 through 19 and 22 were diluted with each of water containing 60 ppm and 100 ppm of calcium carbonate so that the amount of component (B1) became 0.08%. Sample Nos. 20 and 21 were diluted with each of water containing 60 ppm and 100 ppm of calcium carbonate so that the amount of component (B1) became 0.05%. Sample Nos. 23 through 28 were diluted with each of water containing 60 ppm and 100 ppm of calcium carbonate so that the amount of the total components became 0.133%. Each sample was observed on the washing efficiency. The results obtained are shown in Table 2. A washing efficiency test was conducted by employing a wet type artificial stained cloth of Sentaku Kagaku Kyokai (Association of Washing Science) as an artificial stained cloth, and by washing this stained cloth with Targo to Meter under the condition that washing temperature was 25° C, and washing time was 10 minutes, and the agitation number of a stirrer was 120 rpm, and the bath ratio was 1:30, and the repeating number of stained cloth was 5. By measuring reflectivities of original cloth, stained cloth before washing, and stained cloth after washing, washing efficiency was determined utilyzing the following equation: Washing efficiency = [(reflectivity of stained cloth after washing)-(reflectivity of stained cloth before washing)] / [(reflectivity of original cloth)-(reflectivity of stained cloth before washing)] x 100 As shown in Table 2, conventional washing soap compositions (Sample Nos. 23 through 25) showed the washing efficiency of between about 41 and 42% in water containing 60 ppm of calcium carbonate, and between about 42 and 43% in water containing 100 ppm of calcium carbonate. Thus, the washing efficiency showed low value in each of those samples. Further, the compositions which contained component (B1) but did not contain component (A1) (Sample Nos. 26 through 28) also showed the washing efficiency of between about 40 and 42%, which was similar to the above. Thus, those compositions show low value of washing efficiency. Contrary to the above compositions, the compositions containing both component (A1) and (B1) (Sample Nos. 15 through 22) showed the washing efficiency of about 46 to 52% in each of water containing 60 ppm and 100 ppm of calcium carbonate, thus showing high washing efficiency. EXAMPLE 3 Each sample (detergent) shown in Table 3 was prepared. Sample Nos. 29 through 32 and Sample Nos. 33 through 34 were diluted with water containing 60 ppm of calcium carbonate so that the amount of component (B1) became 0.08% and 0.15% respectively. After that, the washing efficiency of each sample against stains of oils and fats on a hard surface was observed and evaluated. The results obtained are shown in Table 3. An aqueous solution of each sample was adjusted to pH 8 using a weak alkali buffer agent, and was put on the washing efficiency test under a condition of water temperature of 20 °C. The washing efficiency test was conducted using a plate prepared in accordance with the method described in JIS K3370 as an artificial stained plate. The plate was washed using an improved type of Leenerts detergency tester under such conditions as the number of revolution is 250 rpm and washing time is 3 minutes. And the plate thus washed was sufficiently rinsed with water and then air-dried, and finally the washing performance was evaluated. By measuring the weights of slide glasses before washing, after washing, and having no stain adhered thereon the washing efficiency was determined utilyzing the following equation: Washing efficiency = [(weight of a stained plate before washing)-(weight of a stained plate after washing)]/[(weight of a stained plate before washing)-(weight of a slide glass)] x 100 Sample No. 29 30 31 32 33 34 Component (par by weight) C 12 O(EO) 3 CH 2 COONa(B1-3) 60 60 60 40 60 LAS(surface active agent) 2 2 15 AO(surface active agent) 1 2 1 GLDA (A1) 5 5 8 8 ethanol 5 5 5 5 5 5 water 30 27 25 24 35 80 (B1)/(A1) 12/1 12/1 15/2 5/1 1/0 - washing efficiency (%) 46.8 50.2 53.6 48.4 31.3 47.2 As is apparent from Table 3, Sample Nos. 29 through 32 have markedly excellent washing performance against oil stains as compared with Sample No. 33, and also have the detergency equal to or higher than that of Sample No. 34 which uses a synthetic surface active agent. It was recognized from the above results that when a very small amount of a surface active agent is added to the composition of the present invention, the washing effect is further improved. EXAMPLE 4 The detergent composition of Sample No. 1 shown in Table 1 was diluted with water so as to bring COD down to 500 ppm. Activated sludge was collected from an activated sludge facility where chemical industry waste water is treated. This activated sludge was supplied to a small sized three-tank series activated sludge facility of aeration type together with the above diluted solution, and the biodegradation test was conducted by aeration. COD in the waste water thus treated for 7 or 8 days was reduced to between 50 and 75 ppm, and the rate of decomposition was between 85 and 90%. EXAMPLE 5 Components shown in Table 4 were blended. The resulting blends were diluted with water containing 60 ppm of calcium carbonate and water containing 100 ppm of calcium carbonate to the concentrations (g/l in terms of anhydride) shown in Table 4 so that Sample Nos. 35 through 48 and Sample Nos. 49 through 56 were prepared respectively. The washing efficiency test was conducted on those Sample Nos. 35 through 56. The results obtained are shown in Table 4. The washing efficiency test and the determination of washing efficiency were executed in the same manner as in Example 2. The blend of each of Sample Nos. 35 and 49 shown in Table 4 is that of the standard detergent defined by JIS K3371 for determining detergency of synthetic detergent for fabrics. Sample No. 35 and 49 were prepared by diluting this blend with water containing 60 ppm and 100 ppm of calcium carbonate respectively. In this test, in case of samples (Nos. 36 through 48) which were diluted with water containing 60 ppm of calcium carbonate and samples (Nos. 50 through 56) which were diluted with hard water containing 100 ppm of calcium carbonate, if their washing efficiencies substantially reach the standard ones of Sample No. 35 and Sample No. 49 respectively, it is judged that the washing efficiency of a sample is excellent. On the other hand, when the washing efficiency of a sample shows a considerably lower value than the relevant standard one, it is judged that the washing efficiency is poor. The following are known from Table 4: In case of Sample Nos. 38 through 48 containing both APG (component (B2)) and GLDA (component (A1)) and diluted with washing water containing 60 ppm of calcium carbonate, their washing efficiencies are in the range of between the minimum value of 43.6% (Sample No. 38) and the maximum value of 51.5% (Sample No. 46), and are substantially comparable to the standard one of 47.7% of Sample No. 35. Therefore, it can be said.that Sample Nos. 38 through 48 prepared according to the present invention are excellent in washing efficiency. Contrary to the above, in case of Sample Nos. 36 and 37 containing either one of components APG and GLDA and diluted with washing water containing 60 ppm of calcium carbonate, their washing efficiencies are 34.8% and 30.1% respectively, and those are far behind the standard one of 47.7% of Sample No. 35. Therefore, it can be said that Sample Nos. 36 and 37 containing either one of components (A1) and (B2) prepared according to the present invention are both poor in washing efficiency. Further, in case of Sample Nos. 52 through 56 containing both components APG and GLDA and diluted with hard water containing 100 ppm of calcium carbonate, their washing efficiencies are in the range of between the minimum value of 38.6% (Sample No. 53) and the maximum value of 43.6% (Sample No. 55), and are substantially comparable to the standard one of 43.0% of Sample No. 49. Therefore, it can be said that the detergent prepared according to the present invention is excellent in washing efficiency even when washing is conducted using hard water containing 100 ppm of calcium carbonate. On the other hand, in case of Sample Nos. 50 and 51 containing only either one of APG and GLDA and diluted with hard water containing 100 ppm of calcium carbonate, their washing efficiencies are 30.3% and 28.4% respectively. Thus, either washing efficiency of Samples does not reach the standard one of 43.0% of Sample No. 49 and far from it. Therefore, it can be said that Sample Nos. 50 and 51 containing either one of components (A1) and (B2) prepared according to the present invention are both poor in washing efficiency. EXAMPLE 6 GLDA was added to a 0.15% aqueous solution of APG, followed by mixing, to prepare a sample aqueous solution (pH = 11) containing 0.1% of GLDA on W/V% basis. Microbial degradability test was conducted in the same manner as has been done in Example 4. As a result, after passing 7 or 8 days, COD in the test sample was lowered to between 50 and 75 ppm, and the rate of decomposition was between 85 and 90% EXAMPLE 7 Components shown in Table 12 were blended, and the resulting blends were diluted with water each containing 60 ppm and 100 ppm of calcium carbonate into the respective concentration (g/l, in terms of anhydride) shown in Table 12, thereby preparing Sample Nos. 75 through 80. The washing efficiency test was conducted on those Sample Nos. 75 through 80. The results obtained are shown in Table 12. The washing efficiency test was conducted in the same manner as in Example 2. The blend of Sample No. 75 shown in Table 12 is that of the standard detergent determining detergency as synthetic detergent for washing fabrics defined by JIS K3371. In this test, when the washing efficiency of a sample is found to almost reach the standard washing efficiency value of Sample No. 75, it is judged that the washing efficiency of the sample is excellent, and when the washing efficiency of a sample is considerably lower than the standard one, it is judged that the washing efficiency of the sample is poor. From Table 12, the washing efficiency of compositions containing three components, i.e., GLDA, and both B2 (APG) and B1-3 (C 12 O(EO) 3 CH 2 COONa) as the surface active agents, as well as a component prepared according to the present invention, are comparable, in any of the compositions, to the standard washing efficiency of 47.7% of Sample No. 75 under the condition of washing water containing 60 ppm of calcium carbonate, and moreover showed a value higher than the standard washing efficiency of 43.0% of Sample No. 75 under the condition of washing water containing 100 ppm of calcium carbonate. Therefore, it can be said that Sample Nos. 76 through 80 prepared according to the present invention are compositions which have extremely excellent washing performance. INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY As described above, the detergent compositions according to the present invention use glutamic acid-N,N-diacetic acid or a salt thereof which has microbial degradability as the chelating agent, and maintain water solubility under low temperature conditions, and has large sequestration, and also use a synthetic surface active agent which has microbial degradability. As a result, the detergent compositions of the present invention have the following effects: (1) The compositions have excellent detergency, particularly showing excellent detergency even in water with high hardness, and is applied as a detergent for fabrics; (2) The compositions have excellent microbial degradability. As a result, waste water treatment by microorganisms, such as activated sludge, is completely performed, and thus environmental pollution does not occur; (3) The detergent compositions using-an alkali salt of polyoxyethylene alkylether acetic acid (B1) as a synthetic surface active agent having microbial degradability, maintain water solubility even under low temperature conditions, and show excellent washing effect without forming a water-insoluble metallic soap. Therefore, it is not necessary to pay any specific attention to water temperature in washing, times of rinsing, and the amount of rinsing water; (4) The detergent compositions using alkyl polyglycoside (B2) as a synthetic surface active agent having microbial degradability enable to use reclaimable or recoverable materials as starting material sources, contrary to the conventional detergent compositions which consume unreclaimable or unrecoverable petroleum resources as staring material sources. Thus, detergent compositions of the present invention are useful for conservation of resources, and are fitted to the demand in future age.

Claims: A detergent composition for washing fabrics, characterized by comprising glutamic acid-N,N-diacetic acid or its salt (component A) represented by the following formula: wherein M represents a hydrogen atom, sodium, potassium, amine or ammonium ion; and a synthetic surface active agent which is an alkali salt of oxyalkylene or polyoxyalkylene alkylether acetic acid and/or an alkyl polyglycoside and has microbial degradability (component B), wherein the composition contains per 1 part by weight of component A: (1) an alkali salt of oxyalkylene or polyoxyalkylene alkylether acetic acid in an amount of between 2 and 50 parts by weight; (2) an alkyl polyglycoside in an amount of between 1/3 and 3 parts by weight; or (3) a mixture of an alkali salt of oxyalkylene or polyoxyalkylene alkylether acetic acid and alkyl polyglycoside in an amount of between 1/3 and 50 parts by weight, wherein in said mixture the proportion (weight ratio) of the alkali salt of oxyalkylene or polyoxyalkylene alkylether acetic acid to the alkyl polyglycoside is between 20 to 80 and 80 to 20. The detergent composition according to claim 1, wherein an alkali salt of oxyalkylene or polyoxyalkylene alkylether acetic acid is selected from the compounds represented by the following formula (1): wherein R represents an alkyl group having a carbon number of between 6 and 20, and R 1 represents a hydrogen atom or methyl group, and M 2 represents a sodium, potassium, amine or ammonium ion, and n is a number between 1 to 6. The detergent composition according to any of the preceding claims wherein the alkyl polyglycoside is selected from the compounds represented by the following formula: RO-Z 4 wherein R represents an alkyl group having a carbon number of between 6 and 20, and Z 4 represents a polyglycosyl group having 1 to 3 hexose and/or pentose units.

Inventors: ARAI NORIO, MORIKAWA KYOKO, SAITO HIROSHI, SAITO MAKOTO, TAKAHASHI CHIE, YAMAMOTO TOHRU, YANAGIHARA KOUJI, ARAI, NORIO, MORIKAWA, KYOKO, SAITO, HIROSHI, SAITO, MAKOTO, TAKAHASHI, CHIE, YAMAMOTO, TOHRU, YANAGIHARA, KOUJI, Saito, Makoto, c/o Kawasaki Works, Yamamoto, Tohru, c/o Kawasaki Works
Applicants: DAISAN KOGYO CO LTD, SHOWA DENKO KK, DAISAN KOGYO CO., LTD., SHOWA DENKO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Application year: 1997
Main classification: C11D1
IPC codes: C11D1, C11D3, C23G1