METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ESTIMATION OF COUPLING PARAMETERS IN A TRANSFORM CODER FOR HIGH QUALITY AUDIO

Abstract: A method and apparatus for determining parameters for coupling of channels in a digital audio encoder. A frequency range of two audio channels is coupled together in a coupling channel, and a systematic method of determining optimum coupling parameters is employed. Sub-bands of the channels are processed individually, and a measure of the power of each sub-band is used to determine a coupling coefficient generation scheme for each individual sub-band. Adjacent ones of the sub-bands using the same coupling scheme are combined to form bands in the coupling channel, which dictate the generation of the coupling coordinates for the audio channels. The arrangement of the sub-bands in bands also facilitates the generation of phase flags for each band, on the basis of the coupling scheme used in the band.

Description: Method and Apparatus for Estimation of Coupling Parameters in a Transform Coder for High Quality Audio Technical Field This invention relates in general to digital signal processing of audio signals, such as music signals. More particularly, the invention relates to the implementation of a high quality dual- channel digital audio encoder, based on the psychoacoustic model of the human auditory system, for digital storage or transmission. Background Art In order to more efficiently broadcast or record audio signals, the amount of information required to represent the audio signals may be reduced. In the case of digital audio signals, the amount of digital information needed to accurately reproduce the original pulse code modulation (PCM) samples may be reduced by applying a digital compression algorithm, resulting in a digitally compressed representation of the original signal. The goal of the digital compression algorithm is to produce a digital representation of an audio signal which, when decoded and reproduced, sounds the same as the original signal, while using a minimum of digital information for the compressed or encoded representation. Recently, the use of psychoacoustic models in the design of audio coders has led to high compression ratios while keeping audible degradation in the compressed signal to a minimum. Description of one such method can be found in the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATS Standard document entitled "Digital Audio Compression (AC-3) Standard", Document A/52, 20 December, 1995. In the basic approach, the time domain signal is first converted to frequency domain using a bank of filters. Frequency domain masking of human auditory system is then exploited to maximise perceived fidelity of the signal transmitted at a given bit-rate. Further compression can be successively obtained by use of a well known technique called coupling. Coupling takes advantage of the way the human ear determines directionality for very high frequency signals, in order to allow a reduction in die amount of data necessary to code an audio signal. At high audio frequency (approximately above 2kHz) the ear is physically unable to detect individual cycles of an audio waveform, and instead responds to the envelope of the waveform. Consequently, the coder combines the high frequency coefficients of the individual channels to form a common coupling channel. The original channels combined to form the said coupling channel are referred to as coupled channels. A basic encoder can form the coupling channel by simply taking the average of all the individual channel coefficients. A more sophisticated encoder can alter the sign of individual channels before adding them into the sum so as to avoid phase cancellations. The generated coupling channel is next sectioned into a number of frequency sub-bands. Frequency sub-bands are grouped together to form coupling bands. For each such band and each coupled channel a coupling co-ordinate is transmitted to the decoder. To obtain the high frequency coefficients in any coupling frequency band, for a particular coupled channel, from the coupling channel, the decoder multiplies the coupling channel coefficients in that coupling frequency band by the coupling co-ordinate of that channel for that particular coupling frequency band. For a dual channel implementation of such a decoder, a phase flag bit may also be provided for each coupled band of the coupling channel. A final step of phase- correction is then performed, by the decoder, in which the coefficients in each band are multiplied by the phase flag bit for that band. As mentioned, a basic encoder can form the coupling channel by simple addition of all me individual channel coefficients, or a more sophisticated encoder may alter the sign of individual channels before addition in order to reduce phase cancellation effects. But no existing single coupling strategy for the entire frequency spectrum of the coupling channel is adequate to ensure minimal information loss due to phase cancellation. The criteria for combining sub-bands to form larger bands is not well understood and most developers usually use a pre-specified banding structure to group the sub-bands into bands. Phase flag computation is performed as an additional step, thereby requiring extra computation. The standard also does not outline any specific method for determination of the phase flag bits. Ad hoc methods do exist but, due to their very nature, do not guarantee any assured performance, nor can be relied upon to provide minimum error between the original coefficients at encoder and the reconstructed, phase corrected, coefficients at the decoder. Summary of the Invention In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method for computing coupling parameters in a digital audio encoder wherein frequency coefficient sub-bands in a coupling frequency range are arranged into coupling bands, including the steps of determining a power value for each sub-band in the frequency range, selecting a coupling scheme for each sub- band based on the corresponding power value, and grouping adjacent sub-bands having the same selected coupling scheme into coupling bands. Preferably the first or second coupling scheme is selected for each sub-band according to whether the power value is positive or negative. Preferably the power valve comprises a correlation computation of frequency coefficients from first and second audio channels. In one form of the invention each sub-band includes at least one frequency coefficient from each of first and second audio channels, wherein the power value for a particular sub-band is determined by summing the product of corresponding frequency coefficients from the first and second channels. Advantageously, the method may include determining a phase reconstruction value for each coupling band on the basis of the coupling scheme selected for the sub-bands in that band. In accordance with the invention, there is also provided a method for generating coupling parameters in a dual channel audio encoder wherein frequency coefficient sub-bands in a coupling frequency range are arranged into coupling bands, each sub-band including at least one frequency coefficient from each of first and second audio channels, including the steps of: i) receiving frequency transform coefficients for the first and second audio channels; ii) computing a power value for each sub-band; iii) for each sub-band, selecting a coupling coefficient generation scheme from first and second schemes on the basis of the computed power value for that sub-band; iv) for each sub-band, generating a coupling coefficient according to the selected one of the first and second schemes for that sub-band; and v) forming bands from adjacent sub-bands having the same selected scheme. Preferably the power value comprises a correlation computation of frequency transform coefficients of the first and second channels. In a preferred implementation, the power value for a said sub-band is computed according to: P = U*W) where P is the power value, a, are frequency coefficients from the first audio channel, b ; are frequency coefficients from the second audio channel, and index i corresponds to frequency coefficients extending over the range of the said sub- band. Preferably, if the power value, P, is greater then zero the coupling coefficients for the sub- band are generated according to: where c, are the coupling coefficients; and if the power value, P, is less than zero the coupling coefficients for the sub-band are generated according to: The method may advantageously include generating a phase flag for a said coupling band on the basis of the power value or coupling coefficient generation scheme for the sub-bands in that coupling band. In a particular form of the invention the phase flag for a particular coupling band is + 1 if the power value, P, for each of die constituent sub-bands is greater than zero, and the phase flag is -1 if the power value, P, for each of the constituent sub-bands is less than zero. The invention also provides a dual channel digital audio encoding apparatus wherein audio data frequency coefficients for first and second channels in a coupling frequency range are arranged in a sequence of sub-bands, comprising: a correlation computation processor for computing a power value for each sub-band; a coupling coefficient generator for generating a sequence of sub-band coupling coefficients using a coupling coefficient generation scheme selected for each sub-band on the basis of the corresponding power value for that sub-band; and a band structure processor for arranging adjacent coupling coefficient sub-bands in the sequence generated with the same generation scheme into bands. The audio encoding apparatus preferably includes a phase estimation processor for generating a phase flag for each band on the basis of the generation scheme used for the constituent sub- bands of the corresponding band. The apparatus may further include a coupling coordinate generator for generating coupling coordinates for the first and second channels for each said band. A sub-band based coupling channel generation strategy can ensure minimal information loss due to phase cancellation of the two coupled channels. The sub-band based coupling strategy may be considered as a generalisation of a channel based strategy. If the coupling strategy remains the same for all bands, the band based coupling strategy is equivalent to the channel based coupling strategy. Even when exact phase cancellation does not occur, error due to phase cancellation can be noticeably large in cases where an appreciable phase lag exists between the two channels. The methods of the preferred embodiments of this invention use power calculations to minimise signal information loss due to coupling. Further, the coupling strategy of of the sub-bands is used to determine the banding structure. This approach reduces d e phase estimation for a band to a simple decision, requiring no extra computation. Brief Description of the Drawings The invention is described in greater detail hereinbelow, by way of example only, through description of an embodiment thereof and with reference to die accompanying drawings, wherein: Figure 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of an audio encoding/decoding process including channel coupling and phase reconstruction; Figures 2a and 2b are diagrammatic illustrations of two primary coupling strategies; Figure 3 is a block diagram of a dual channel audio encoder apparatus constructed according to an embodiment of the invention; and Figure 4 is a flow-chart diagram of a procedure for generating coupling coefficients and phase flags according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments As mentioned, one method for compression of digital audio signals is described in the ATSC Standard entitled "Digital Audio Compression (AC-3) Standard", (Document A/52, 20 December, 1995), and the contents of that document are expressly incorporated herein by reference. The following description of a preferred embodiment of me invention is presented in the context of an audio encoder which is compatible with die AC-3 Standard. An AC-3 encoder xcepts PCM audio and produces an encoded bit stream consistent with the AC-3 standard. The specifics of the audio encoding process are not normative requirements of the standard, but an compatible encoder must produce a bit stream matching the syntax set out in the AC-3 standard document, which, when decoded as specified, produces audio of sufficient quality for d e intended application. The AC-3 algorithm achieves high coding gain (the ratio of the input bit-rate to die output bit- rate) by coarsely quantizing a frequency domain representation of die audio signal. The basic encoding process is as follows. The first step in die encoding process is to transform the representation of audio from a sequence of PCM time samples into a sequence of blocks of frequency coefficients. This is done in me analysis filter bank. Overlapping blocks of 512 time samples are multiplied by a time window and transformed into the frequency domain. Due to die overlapping blocks, each PCM input sample is represented in two sequential transformed blocks. The frequency domain representation may then be decimated by a factor of two so tiiat each block contains 256 frequency coefficients. The individual frequency coefficients are represented in binary exponential notation as a binary exponent and a mantissa- The set of exponents is encoded into a coarse representation of the signal spectrum which is referred to as me spectral envelope. This spectral envelope is used by a core bit allocation routine which determines how many bits to use to encode each individual mantissa. The spectral envelope and die coarsely quantized mantissas for 6 audio blocks (1536 audio samples) are formatted into an AC-3 frame. The AC-3 bit stream is a sequence of AC-3 frames. Channel coupling is performed during encoding by averaging certain transform coefficients across channels that are included in d e coupling channel. Each coupled channel has a unique set of coupling coordinates which are used to preserve the high frequency envelopes of die original channels. The coupling process is performed for transform coefficients corresponding to frequencies above a coupling frequency mat is defined by a pre-specified value, cplbegf. The decoder converts the coupling channel back into individual channels by multiplying d e coupled channel transform coefficient values by the coupling coordinate for tiiat channel and frequency sub-band. An additional processing step occurs where only two channels are coupled and phase flag bits are employed. In mis case a phase-flag-in-use bit (phsflginu) is set in the encoded bit-stream, and phase restoration bits are retrieved from me bit-stream by the decoder in die form of phase flag bits. The phase flag bits are arranged to represent die coupling sub-bands in a frequency ascending order. If a phase flag bit is set for a particular sub-band, all of die right channel transform coefficients within the coupled sub-band are negated (inverted) after modification by me coupling coordinate, but before inverse transformation. Transform coefficients #37 through #252 are grouped into 18 sub-bands of 12 coefficients each, as shown below in Table 1. The parameter cplbegf indicates die number of the coupling sub-band which is the first to be included in die coupling process. Below die frequency (or transform coefficient number, tc#) indicated by cplbegf all channels are independently coded. Above die frequency indicated by cplbegf, channels included in die coupling process share the common coupling channel, up to die frequency (or tc#) indicated by a parameter cplbegf. The coupling channel is coded up to d e frequency (or tc#) indicated by cplendf, which represents the last coupling sub-band which is coded. The parameter cplendf is interpreted by adding 2 to its value, so die last coupling sub-band which is coded can range from 2-17. The coupling channel sub-bands are combined in to coupling bands for which coupling coordinates are generated for each coupled channel (and included in die bit stream). The coupling band structure is indicated by a parameter cplbndstrcfsbndj. Each bit of the cplbndstrcβ array indicates whetiier the sub-band corresponding to die index is combined into the previous (lower in frequency) coupling band. Coupling bands are tiius each structured based on an integral number of coupling channel sub-bands. Figure 1 diagrammatically illustrates die general coupling process. In this Figure, die Figure portions la to li illustrate diagrammatically die various frequency coefficients, coupling coordinates and phase flag values as functions of frequency over a portion of an encoding followed by decoding process. In a dual channel encoder, die input bit stream comprises interleaved digitised signals of two channels, the two individual channels hereinafter being identified as α (left channel) and b (right channel). The first step is to extract a block of the digitised samples, for both channel α and b, from the input stream and transform it to die frequency domain using filter banks, to generate frequency domain coefficients. The general frequency domain coefficients for channels α and b are hereinafter identified as α, and b, (see Fig. la and lb), respectively, where die subscript i identifies die corresponding frequency sub-band of die coefficient. A frequency point called f-^,^ (coupling begin frequency) is selected by the encoder based on the cplbegf ' parameter as outlined above. Frequency coefficients a t and b it for all i below f are sent individually by the encoder into the compressed bit stream (see Fig. lc and lh). Another frequency point called /^^ (coupling end frequency) is selected based on a defined parameter cplendf. Frequency coefficients α f and b t for all i above f-^ and below /^^ are combined in a binary operation to generate a coupling channel, c. Channels a and b, which form the coupling channel, are referred to as coupled channels. The coupled channels, thus, share the common coupling channel between f^g and f^^ (see Fig. le). The way in which the coupled channels are combined to form the coupling channel is not specified by the AC-3 standard. The coupling channel is sectioned into sub-bands, each sub-band generally comprising an equal number of coefficients. For example, coupling channel coefficients c„ for between f cp and s B w-ι > could form the first sub-band, SBW denoting the sub-band width. Coefficients c„ for i between 2 ssw.ι , would then form the second sub- band and so on. Adjacent coupling sub-bands are next combined for form coupling bands (bands 0, 1 and 2 shown in Fig. le). Each coupling band may contain one or more coupling sub-bands. Thus, a coupling band width will always be a multiple of SBW. The grouping of sub-bands to form bands is determined at runtime by the encoder. The coupling band structure, sent as a part of the encoded bitstream, indicates to die decoder which coupling sub-bands were combined to form each coupling band. As an example, Fig. le shows three bands covering the full coupling channel spectrum. For each coupling band and each coupled channel, a coupling co-ordinate is sent by the encoder (see Fig. Id and It). To restore the original channel coefficients a,- or b in a particular band, the decoder must multiply each coupling channel coefficient c, in that band by the coupling-coordinate value for that band and channel (see Fig. Id and le). For example, if ψ is the coupling co-ordinate for a band in the coupled channel b, the coefficients estimate for b at the decoder, called b „ will be b , = ψc, Eq. 1 The encoder measures the original signal power in the band for the individual coupled channel, as well as the power in the coupling channel for the same band. The ratio of original signal power within a band to the coupling channel power in the same band is termed as the coupling co-ordinate for die band. For a dual channel encoder, a phase flag bit is also sent for each coupling band. It indicates whether the decoder should invert the coupling channel coefficients when reconstructing coefficients for coupled channel b. However, the standard does not specify any unified strategy for coupling channel generation, formulation of coupling band structure, or determination of phase flag for each band. Therefore, embodiments of mis invention provide a method for taking these three decisions, based on strong mathematical and practical reasons, with the overall objective being to provide a plan for efficient implementation of a viable encoder using coupling characteristics of audio. Consider Fig. 2a which shows coupling channel c being generated from a and b by simple addition and scaling, i.e. c ; = (a + b)/2, for i over the entire frequency range f^ a ,^ to f cp i a tf - It is evident from Fig. 2a that a loss of information will result at some frequencies, which cannot be recovered at any later stage. Fig. 2b preserves On the other hand, by using the coupling strategy, c,- = (a x - b,)/2, the information lost in the frequency sub-bands of the Fig. 2a strategy can be preserved, but it is evident that information is lost at other frequencies. Based on this analysis, it is clear that no single coupling channel generation strategy can be adequate for preserving die signal content over the entire frequency range for the coupling channel. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention utilise a coupling strategy mat is formulated at sub-band level to minimise information loss due to phase cancellation. The two primarily available strategies which are available for generation of coefficients of a coupling channel are illustrated by Eq. 2 and Eq. 3: c, = (α, + b)/2 Eq. 2 or c, = (α, - b,)/2 Eq. 3 For each sub-band, the decision of whether Eq. 2 or Eq. 3 should be used as die coupling coefficient generation strategy is taken by computing d e power in the resulting coupling sub- band. Consider die first sub-band (sub-band 1). If the resulting power in sub-band 1 , by use of coupling strategy of Eq. 2, is greater than the power in the sub-band by use of coupling strategy of Eq. 3, the Eq. 2 is chosen as the coupling strategy for the sub-band. That is, if ∑,[tø + bJ/2] 2 > [fø - b ; )/2] 2 Eq. 4 -∑, β, * *, >0 Eq. 5 then, Eq. 2 is chosen as the coupling strategy for the corresponding sub-band. The power computation for determining a coupling coefficient generation strategy ensures that signal loss due to phase cancellation does not occur or is minimised at me sub-band level. The next adjacent sub-band (e.g. sub-band 2 according to the above example) is then analysed. A similar power calculation is performed on this sub-band to determine die coupling strategy. If the coupling strategy determined for mis sub-band is same as the previous one, then this sub-band is combined witii the previous one in forming a coupling band. If ώe coupling strategy for this band is opposite to tiiat of the previous one then a new coupling band is begun, starting widi the current sub-band. In the case that several adjacent sub-bands are computed witii die same coupling strategy, an upper limit on coupling band-width can be used. For example, if six adjacent sub-bands have the same coupling strategy, then groups of three can be used to form two bands. This consideration can in some instances be important, since it is possible for all of the coupling co-ordinates to be computed with die same coupling strategy which, without some limit, would result in an extremely large band-width and can cause poor reconstruction of coupling channel coefficients at the decoder. The limit can, in fact, be a function of the frequency level of die sub-bands since die human ear has different responses over different audible frequency ranges. Where a band is formed using the method described above, for diat band die coupling strategy is identical over all its constituent sub-bands. Since, for each sub-band die decision on coupling strategy between the two options of Eq. 2 and Eq. 3 was taken by determining the power in me sub-band, it can be concluded tiiat the total power in the coupling channel band is greater tiian the power if the odier option had been chosen. For example, suppose sub-bands 1, 2 and 3 are combined to form the coupling band 0. Since tiiese sub-bands are grouped into d e same band, tiiey must, according to die described metiiod, follow the same coupling strategy. Assume that Eq. 2 was d e coupling strategy for sub-bands 1, 2 and 3. Therefore: fo + b,) 2 ≥ ∑ite - by- for all i in sub-band 1 Eq. 6 £,(β, + b 2 ≥ ∑,(a, - b t f for all i in sub-band 2 Eq. 7 ∑ifa + b- 1 ≥ ∑j/α, - bf for all i in sub-band 3 Eq. 8 Summing Eq. 6, 7 and 8 obtains: ∑,tø + by- ≥ ∑,(fl, - by for all i in band 0 Eq. 9 Simplifying Eq. 9 obtains: ∑ifa-pi) ≥ 0 for all i in band 0 Eq. 10 The coupling co-ordinate can then be generated using die known ratio technique: die coupling co-ordinate for a band is die ratio of the power in original coupled channel in the band to e power in the coupling channel for the same band. Various methods can be utilised to determine d e phase flags, and one optimum method for least square error is described in d e applicant's copending patent application entitled "Method and Apparatus for Phase Estimation in a Transform Coder for High Quality Audio", the contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference. In summary, the preferred memod for phase reconstruction data (phase flag) generation is as follows. Assume that the frequency coefficients witiiin a particular band are identified as: -. j for the first coupled channel, b; for die second coupled channel, c, for the coupling channel, and index i extends over die frequency range of the band. Then, phase_flag = sign(∑(b j *Ci)) Eq. 11 Note : me sign() function has die general interpretation, tiiat is, it returns a + 1 if d e function parameter is a positive number and -1 if it is negative. For die case of zero, any value. + 1 or -1 , can be considered as die signals are tiien, essentially, orthogonal (uncorrelated). Suppose for a band, die coupling strategy was tiiat of Eq. 2 (as in the previous example of band 0). Then Eq. 10 holds. Substituting the value of c, from Eq. 2 into Eq. 11 then yields: phase Jlag = sigrK∑Φfia, + b,)/2)) Eq. 12 -phase Jlag = signC∑bfa, + ∑ b ) Eq. 13 The square of a real number is always positive, therefore Using Eq. 10, it follows that the phase flag for this case will be + 1. If Eq. 3 had been die coupling strategy, i.e. if Eq. 5 was false, for each sub-band forming the band, d e phase flag for the band would tiien be -1. To summarise, a coupling strategy is described herein which is formulated at die sub-band level, based on die result of Eq. 5 for each sub-band. This strategy ensures that the coupling does not result in information loss due to phase cancellation. Then, only adjacent coupling sub-bands witii identical coupling strategy are grouped togedier to form coupling bands. Accordingly, for each coupling band, if Eq. 2 is utilised as die coupling strategy for the band, die phase flag for the band can be automatically set to + 1. Otherwise, if Eq. 3 was employed as the coupling strategy, then the phase flag for the band should set to -1. This tiien ensures a least square error between the original channel frequency coefficients at die encoder and die estimated coefficients recovered using die phase flags at the decoder. Therefore, die condition tiiat a band should comprise only diose sub-bands witii identical coupling strategies not only gready simplifies the phase estimation but can also be utilised to minimise error due to phase mis-representation. Upon completion of die whole process for all the bands in die coupling frequency range, the main parameters for the coupling of die channels are fully determined. The computational requirements for the entire process is minimal, especially since all the diree operations • coupling channel generation • determination of banding structure • phase flag estimation are combined in one unified approach. Figure 3 is a block diagram showing a dual channel audio encoder apparatus 10 for implementing diis coupling parameter determination method. The encoder 10 receives PCM coded audio samples corresponding to left and right audio channels referred to as channel a (12) and channel b (14), respectively. The audio data from channels a and b are passed to respective analysis filter banks 16, 18 of conventional form, which transform the audio data into frequency domain transform coefficients a; and b v The transform coefficients are passed to a coupling processor 20 which generates coupling channel coefficients Cj. The encoder 10 includes a coupling band structure determination processor 22, which determines how the sub-bands are structured into bands in die coupling channel according to die above described mediod based on die computed power in each sub-band and die resulting coupling strategy (Eq. 2 or Eq. 3) which is used. The banding structure processor 22 controls left and right channel coupling coordinate computation processors 24, 26 so as to generate left and right coupling coordinates for each band. The coupling coordinate computation processors receive as input die coupling channel coefficients c { and d e respective left or right channel transform coefficients a,, b t , and generate respective channel coupling coordinates according to the coupling band structure dictated by die banding Structure processor 22. A phase estimation processor 28 is also provided which receives as input the coupling channel coefficients and die right channel coefficients b j . The phase estimation processor 28 is also controlled by die banding structure processor 22 so tiiat die phase flags generated diereby correspond to die predefined frequency bands of die channel coupling coordinates. For each coupling channel frequency band d e phase estimation processor generates a corresponding phase flag according to die coupling strategy used for mat band, as described above. The phase flags are output to be included in die encoded bit stream along witii me coupling channel coefficients q, and die left and right channel coupling coordinates. The dual channel audio encoder apparatus 10 is preferably implemented as part of an application specific integrated circuit, in which case die functional blocks described above may comprise circuit portions which interact with one anodier under control of timing and control circuitry. Alternatively, however, the encoder apparatus may be implemented by a more general purpose data processing circuit such as a conventional microprocessor, and in dial case die functions performed by die individual functional blocks as above described may all be performed by die same microprocessor circuit according to instructions defining die functions which are stored as, for example, micro-code. Figure 4 is a flow-chart diagram of a procedure 30 for generating coupling coefficients and phase flags according to a preferred embodiment of die invention. The procedure 30 begins with step 32 where audio data frequency transform coefficients for the left and right channels (aj, b) are received. From tiiis data, frequency transform coefficients for a first sub-band are selected at step 34. Also (step 36), a band width count, representing the number of sub-bands forming a coupling channel band, is initialised (e.g. set to zero), and a coupling flag S is also initialised to zero. The coupling flag S is capable of taking on the values 0, + 1 and -1. A power value P is tiien computed at step 38 for the first sub-band of die audio data, by determining a correlation between coefficients of the left and right channels in the sub-band, using P = Li(ai*bi). If the power value, P, is determined to be a positive value at step 40, then the procedure passes to step 42 where a coupling coefficient c=, is computed according to a first coupling strategy, wherein c, = (α t + b,)/2. Following step 42, the procedure 30 examines the value of die coupling flag S to determine if die coupling flag is set to S = + 1. If it is then that is an indication tiiat coupling coefficients in die currently open coupling band have also been computed using die first coupling strategy. In this case, the procedure passes to step 58 where the sub-band is added to die currently open coupling band, and the band width count is incremented. Similarly, if the power value, P, is determined to be a negative value at step 40, then me procedure passes to step 48 where a coupling coefficient c, is computed according to a second coupling strategy, wherein c, = (α { - bi)/2. The procedure 30 tiien examines the value of the coupling flag S (step 50) to determine if the coupling flag is set to S = -1 , and if so tiien die procedure passes to step 58 where the sub-band is added to die currently open coupling band, and die band width count is incremented. In die event tiiat die test of die coupling flag S is found to be not true at step 44 or 50, the procedure passes to step 46 or 52, respectively, where die coupling flag is set accordingly. In tiiis case die current coupling band is no longer valid, which can be because i) there is no coupling band open because d e procedure has only just begun and die first sub-band is being processed; ii) die current coupling band contains sub-band coupling coefficients computed using the odier coupling strategy; or iϋ) the current coupling band has reached die band width limit. Therefore, a new coupling band is opened (step 54) to which to add die current sub- band to. The phase flag for the new coupling band is set equal to the coupling flag S, which was set to die corresponding correct value at step 46 or 52. Following step 56, die procedure 30 continues to step 58 where the sub-band is added to die just opened coupling band, and die band width count for tiiat coupling band is incremented. The value of die band widdi count is examined at step 60. If the band width count has not reached its limit, then the next sub-band data is selected from the audio data frequency transform coefficients at step 64, before the procedure returns to step 38. Otherwise, if the band widtii limit has been reached for die current coupling band, die band widtii count is reset and die coupling flag set to S = 0, before the procedure continues to step 64. By setting the coupling flag to S = 0, the procedure is caused to open a new coupling band during the next iteration by virtue of steps 44, 50 and step 54. This series of steps (38 to 64) is then carried out for all of die remaining frequency coefficients in the audio data for which coupling is applicable. The foregoing detailed description of embodiments of die invention have been presented by way of example only, and this description is not intended to be considered limiting to the invention as defined in d e claims appended hereto.

Claims: Claims: 1. A method for computing coupling parameters in a digital audio encoder wherein frequency coefficient sub-bands in a coupling frequency range are arranged into coupling bands, including die steps of determining a power value for each sub-band in die frequency range, selecting a coupling scheme for each sub-band based on die corresponding power value, and grouping adjacent sub-bands having the same selected coupling scheme into coupling bands. 2. A metiiod as claimed in claim 1, including determining coupling coefficients according to a first or second selected coupling scheme. 3. A metiiod as claimed in claim 2, wherein the first or second coupling scheme is selected for each sub-band according to whetiier the power value is positive or negative. 4. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein each sub-band includes at least one frequency coefficient from each of first and second audio channels, and wherein the power value for a particular sub-band is determined by summing the product of corresponding frequency coefficients from die first and second channels. 5. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the power value for each sub-band is deteπnined by a correlation computation of frequency coefficients from first and second audio channels. 6. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, including determining a phase reconstruction value for each coupling band on die basis of the coupling scheme selected for die sub-bands in tiiat band. 7. A metiiod for generating coupling parameters in a dual channel audio encoder wherein frequency coefficient sub-bands in a coupling frequency range are arranged into coupling bands, each sub-band including at least one frequency coefficient from each of first and second audio channels, including die steps of: i) receiving frequency transform coefficients for the first and second audio channels; 5 ii) computing a power value for each sub-band; iii) for each sub-band, selecting a coupling coefficient generation scheme from first and second schemes on the basis of the computed power value for that sub-band; iv) for each sub-band, generating at least one coupling coefficient according to die selected one of die first and second schemes for that sub-band; and 10 v) forming bands from adjacent sub-bands having the same selected scheme. 8. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the power value for each sub-band is computed by calculating a correlation of frequency transform coefficients from the first and second audio channels. 15 9. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the power value for a said sub-band is computed according to: P = ∑ i (a i *b i ) where P is die power value, 20 a j are frequency coefficients from me first audio channel, b ; are frequency coefficients from the second audio channel, and index i corresponds to frequency coefficients extending over die range of the said sub- band. 25 10. A method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the first or second coupling coefficient generation scheme is selected on die basis of whedier the power value, P, is greater or less than zero. 11. A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein if the power value, P, is greater then zero 30 the coupling coefficients for die sub-band are generated according to: C = (a, + b ; )/2 where are the coupling coefficients; and if the power value, P, is less than zero the coupling coefficients for the sub-band are generated according to: 12. A method as claimed in any one of claims 7 to 11, including generating a phase flag for a said coupling band on die basis of the power value or coupling coefficient generation scheme for the sub-bands in tiiat coupling band. 13. A method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the phase flag for a particular coupling band is + 1 if the power value, P, for each of the constituent sub-bands is greater than zero, and the phase flag is -1 if the power value, P, for each of die constituent sub-bands is less than zero. 14. A dual channel digital audio encoding apparatus wherein audio data frequency coefficients for first and second channels in a coupling frequency range are arranged in a sequence of sub-bands, comprising: a correlation computation processor for computing a power value for each sub-band; a coupling coefficient generator for generating a sequence of sub-band coupling coefficients using a coupling coefficient generation scheme selected for each sub-band on die basis of die corresponding power value for that sub-band; and a band structure processor for arranging adjacent coupling coefficient sub-bands in die sequence generated witii the same generation scheme into bands. 15. A dual channel digital audio encoding apparatus as claimed in claim 14, including a phase estimation processor for generating a phase flag for each band on die basis of die generation scheme used for die constituent sub-bands of die corresponding band. 16. A dual channel digital audio encoding apparatus as claimed in claim 14 or 15, including a coupling coordinate generator for generating coupling coordinates for the first and second channels for each said band.

Inventors: ABSAR MOHAMMED JAVED, ALVAREZ-TINOCO ANTONIO MARIO, GEORGE SAPNA, ABSAR, MOHAMMED, JAVED, ALVAREZ-TINOCO, ANTONIO, MARIO, GEORGE, SAPNA
Applicants: ABSAR MOHAMMED JAVED, ALVAREZ TINOCO ANTONIO MARIO, GEORGE SAPNA, SGS THOMSON MICROELECTRONICS A, ABSAR, MOHAMMED, JAVED, ALVAREZ-TINOCO, ANTONIO, MARIO, GEORGE, SAPNA, SGS-THOMSON MICROELECTRONICS ASIA PACIFIC (PTE) LTD.
Application year: 1997
Main classification: H04B1
IPC codes: H04B1, H04S1