METHOD OF IMPROVING INDOOR AIR QUALITY BY THERMALLY INACTIVATING FUNGI ON BUILDING SURFACES

Abstract: A method of improving the indoor air quality in a building comprising at least partially inactivating fungal mycelia and spores associated with a building material surface by applying onto the surface thermal energy initially contained in water vapour at a pressure exceeding 1 bar, in an amount which is sufficient to at least partially inactivate said fungal mycelia and spores but essentially without causing damages to the surface material.

Description: METHOD OF IMPROVING INDOOR AIR QUALITY BY THERMALLY INACTI¬ VATING FUNGI ON BUILDING SURFACES FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention pertains to improving indoor air qua- lity by providing a method of reducing the fungal contamina¬ tion by thermally inactivating fungi present on building material surfaces, including surfaces which are hidden, i.e. readily visible or accessible. TECHNICAL BACKGROUND AND PRIOR ART It is well-known that in sufficiently moist or damp condi¬ tions almost any building material can become mouldy, i.e. growth of fungi occurs on the surface of the materials, frequently to an extent where the fungal growth becomes visually recognizable optionally in the form of disfigure- ments on the building material surface. Development of indoor fungal contamination is influenced by moisture, nutrients, pH, temperature and light, of which moisture is the most important. Fungal growth is predominant¬ ly controlled by the water content of the surface of a material and the relative humidity (RH) of the air which has an indirect influence through drying or moistening the material. In case of hygric equilibrium between air and the material, fungal growth is likely to occur when the RH exceeds 76-96% depending on fungal species, temperature, time, composition and hygroscopicity of a material. Fungal species can grow within a rather wide temperature range such as 0 to 40°C, the specific temperature range depending on the species. Such a high moisture content in buildings typically results from condensation of ambient moisture on cold surfaces, water leakages from plumbing constructions or through leaky roofs or cellar walls, or ventilation rates which are inadequate to remove the moisture in the building. Additionally, high amounts of moisture may be generated directly by occupants or by their activities such as bathing, cleaning or cooking. Thus, high indoor moisture contents are typically found in buildings with a high density of occupants such as in schools, day-care centres and office buildings. Mouldy buildings are commonly found in areas with temperate or cold climates, since under such climatic conditions, the outdoor/indoor temperature difference is high, in particular during winter. However, such temperature differences will also occur in tropic and subtropic regions during summer where buildings are cooled. Most building materials are porous. When condensation of water near cold surfaces occurs, the condensed water will be absorbed by the porous surface material. Under these circum¬ stances, the moisture content of the surface material may increase significantly up to highly wet levels not far from saturation. Surface condensation of water vapour is thus considered to be one of the major causes of fungal disfigure¬ ments of buildings. In the present context, the term "buildings" includes build¬ ings where farm animals are kept, such as stables, cowsheds, studs, barns and premises for keeping pigs. The climatic conditions including the moisture content in such animal premises are frequently such that good conditions for fungal growth are provided which may result in fungal contamination of the surface materials in these premises resulting in a poor indoor quality for human individuals working in such buildings. Accordingly, fungal contamination of animal pre¬ mises can become a serious occupational heath risk for farm labourers. It is contemplated that the present method is very useful for controlling the fungal contamination of the above premises with the objective of improving the indoor quality therein. Under the above moisture conditions, fungal contamination of indoor building materials may build up to levels which have adverse health implications for those individuals occupying the building. Systemic or local symptoms ascribable to the load of fungal contamination will primarily occur as a result of fungal material or metabolites being released from the contaminated surfaces into the indoor air. During the last decade it has been recognized that a high fungal contamina¬ tion of indoor air may cause serious health problems. Thus, certain fungal species may influence the immune system nega¬ tively or cause serious infections in subjects having an immune deficiency e.g. caused by HIV or by an immunosuppressive treatment such as in cancer patients sub¬ jected to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Additionally, fungi in indoor air may cause allergy symptoms or they may have a direct toxic effect due to the production of toxic metabolites i.e. mycotoxins. One particular pathogenic, toxin-producing fungal species which is often found in moist buildings is StachyJotrys atra. Frequently, however, fungal contamination of indoor air gives rise to a syndrome of more general symptoms of a non-specific nature. This syndrome is referred to by the WHO as Sick Building Syndrome. The presently available measures to eliminate or control fungal contamination problems in buildings include: (i) Remediation measures whereby heavily contaminated con¬ struction elements are removed, optionally followed by suit¬ able measures to reduce the moisture content to levels which prevent renewed build-up of contamination including improved ventilation and removal of sources of moisture. Obviously, such a measure is very costly. (ii) Removal of visible fungal growth e.g. by vacuum cleaning followed by applying fungicidal chemicals substances onto the contaminated building material surfaces. Such a method is disclosed in EP-A-355 765 where a quaternary ammonium com¬ pound is used for treating interior surfaces and ventilation systems. Other fungicidal substances presently used for controlling fungal contamination of building structures include disodium-octaborate-tetrahydrate, benzalconium chlo¬ ride and pyrocatechin. The disadvantages of using chemical control of fungal contamination are clearly that the applica¬ tion hereof may have toxic side effects on occupants or give rise to unacceptable off-odours and that those applying the substances need to carry protective garments and devices. (iii) It is known to destroy attacks in buildings by the dry rot fungus, Meruli s lacry ans by treating wood constructions with hot air at about 90°C which temperature has to be main¬ tained for hours or even days to obtain a wood core tempera- ture of 50-60°C. However, such an extreme thermal treatment cannot be used generally to directly reduce fungal contamina¬ tion on surfaces of building structures. Such a treatment is costly, and more importantly, such a long-term thermal treat¬ ment of building materials will inevitably cause damages to e.g. electrical installations, or it will cause deformations e.g. of plastic based materials and deteriorate glue based joinings. (iv) It has also been attempted to control fungal growth on building structures by conditioning the air by introducing dry air at a temperature of about 50-60°C to reduce the indoor moisture content to levels where fungal growth is inhibited. Such a measure is disclosed in DE-A-3 338 848 and EP-A-143 324. However, such a measure is not effective with regard to inactivating the fungal spores, and dried surfaces are more prone to become recontaminated. Furthermore, this measure has to be repeated continuously to be effective and thus, it is costly. In a recent Danish report on mould fungi in public buildings ("Skimmelsvampe i offentlige bygninger" published by Forlaget Kommuneinformation, 1995) it was concluded that none of the presently available measures for controlling fungal contami¬ nation in buildings are acceptable or suitable for the rea¬ sons mentioned above, and the report states that the only remaining possibility to control fungal growth in buildings is the replacement of contaminated materials with clean materials. It is currently anticipated that the total costs for such remediation initiatives which need to be taken in public buildings in Denmark may amount to several billion US dollars. A strong need therefore exists to provide an alternative method of removing and controlling fungal contamination of building structures as a means of improving the indoor air quality in the buildings, which is effective, non-toxic and cost-effec ive. It is known to use steam generating apparatuses for conven¬ tional cleaning purposes in indoor environments of a normal hygienic standard including residential and industrial build¬ ings such as e.g. food production facilities, which are not suffering from fungal contamination to the extent as is described herein, i.e. not to an extent where occupants suffer from symptoms generally associated with fungal con¬ tamination. However, it has not been suggested that the use of water vapour-derived energy provides a useful and effec¬ tive means of controlling such extensive fungal contamination on building structures. It has now surprisingly been found that an alternative, cost- effective and safe method of controlling fungal contamination of building structures can be provided which is based on applying a high amount of thermal energy derived from water vapour under pressure onto fungally contaminated building material surfaces for a short period, i.e. seconds or few minutes whereby effective inactivation of fungal mycelia and spores is obtained without damages to the building materials. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of improving the indoor air quality in a building whose occu¬ pant(s) has/have symptoms ascribable to fungal contamination, the method comprising at least partially inactivating fungal mycelia and spores associated with a building material sur¬ face by applying onto said surface thermal energy initially contained in water vapour at a pressure exceeding 1 bar, in an amount which is sufficient to at least partially inacti- vate said fungal mycelia and spores but essentially without causing damages to the surface material. DETAILED DISCLOSURE The method according to the invention has been developed with the objective of improving the indoor air quality in a build- ing whose occupant (s) has/have symptoms ascribable to fungal contamination. Such symptoms are well-known and includes the above "Sick building sickness syndrome" and the so-called "Damp building syndrome". The symptoms associated with such a syndrome include general symptoms such as head aches, fatigue, general malaise, apathy and dizziness and more localized pathological symptoms from mucous membranes in the eyes and the respiratory tract. Other symptoms of being exposed to heavy fungal contamination are allergy symptoms, reduced function of the immune system or digestive tract symptoms. Such symptoms will occur when the content of fungal spores in indoor air reaches a threshold level depending on the fungal species contaminating the building. Numerous species of filamentous and yeast fungi have been isolated from damp buildings. Commonly found fungi include Botry-derma spp., Penicillium spp., Cladosporidium spp., Aspergillus spp. and Sisotretrema spp., but other species may also be isolated such as eg Botrytis spp., Mucor spp., Fusarium spp., Alter- naria spp.. Epicoccum spp. and Phoma spp. However, the objec¬ tive of the present invention is to inactivate any fungal species which may grow on indoor surfaces of building materials. Typically, the load of airborne fungal propagules including spores m > damp buildings is in the range of 102 to IO 5 fungal colony forming units/m 3 . The primary sources of indoor airborne fungal contamination in damp buildings are fungal mycelia and spores associated with building material surfaces. Practically any surface of the building construction, whether it is a directly visible surface or a hidden, not immediately accessible surface such as in crawl spaces, may under conditions favouring develop¬ ment of fungal growth become contaminated. Fungal growth may also occur in the interface between building materials and covering materials such as beneath wall paper or other wall covering materials or beneath floorings such as carpets, linoleum and polymer-based floorings. Under particularly damp conditions, the fungal growth may develop to an extent where pronounced disfigurements of the materials occur. The method according to the invention is suitable for treat¬ ment of both directly accessible (outer) surfaces and the above hidden building surfaces. However, it will be under¬ stood that in case of hidden building surfaces, it will generally be required to remove coverings, floorings or the building construction materials as such to expose the fungal¬ ly contaminated surface prior to carrying out the method of the invention. Like other living organisms, fungi require organic nutrients for growth. However, even purely inorganic materials in buildings may provide sufficient nutrients for fungal growth due to soiling or absorption of airborne organic particles. Thus, materials where fungal contamination can be controlled using the method of this invention include purely inorganic materials, materials which are predominantly inorganic but comprising varying amounts of organic additives, and predomi¬ nantly organic materials. The method of the invention can be applied not only to surfaces delimiting rooms in a building i.e. walls, ceilings, doors, windows and floors but also to surface materials in e.g. crawl spaces and accessible parts of ventilation systems. As used herein the term "surface" will include organic and/or inorganic surface coverings such as e.g. carpets, wall paper, plaster, organic paint including emulsion type paints, inorganic paints, varnishes, lacquers and any type of conventionally used building materials inclu¬ ding gypsum boards, acoustic fibre boards, wood, plywood, concrete, ceiling tiles such as tiles consisting of mineral fibre with a vinyl surface, glass fibre and materials com¬ prising starch, paper fibre, clay, perlite, silica, styrene acrylic polymer and phenolic resins. The method of the invention is, as it is mentioned above, based on the application onto a fungally contaminated build¬ ing material surface of thermal energy in an amount which is sufficient to at least partially inactivate the fungal mycelia and spores but essentially without causing damages to the surface material. During the experimentation leading to the present invention it was attempted to inactivate visible fungal growth on floor boards and ceiling plywood boards by subjecting these materials to a convection heat treatment in an oven at 100°C for a period of time which did not cause damage to the materials (about 60 seconds) . However, such a treatment was ineffective with regard to inactivation of fungal propagules. In contrast hereto, it was found that treating such material surfaces carrying visually recognizable fungal growth with water vapour under pressure such as e.g. in excess of 2 bars being released to surfaces at a short distance and for a short period of time provided an amount of energy which effectively inactivate fungal propagules including spores. Pressurized water vapour in its gaseous state will, as it is commonly known, when it is relieved of the pressure into an atmosphere at 1 bar will have a temperature of about 100°C such as in the range of 90-110°C, the specific temperature depending on the ambient pressure. However, when released into air at ambient temperature it will cool momentarily and thereby be transformed into its liquid state. By this transi¬ tion of the physical state of the water vapour an amount of thermal energy of about 2260 kJ/kg of water is released momentarily. This release of thermal energy is also referred to as condensation energy. It is assumed that this momentary and concentrated energy release represents the major contri¬ bution to the fungal inactivation effect which is observed herein. Accordingly, in one embodiment of the present method the thermal energy is derived from a transition of the state of the water vapour from the gaseous to the liquid state at a temperature in the range of 90-110°C. In accordance with the method of the invention, the water vapour can conveniently be applied to the building surfaces by means of conventional vapour generating apparatuses. In typical designs, such apparatuses comprise a container or a tank to contain water under pressure, provided with electric heating means such as heating elements or heating coils, pressure valve means to obtain the desired vapour pressure, a tubing of metal or a flexible material to conduct the water vapour to an outlet of the tubing, which appropriately may be in the form of a nozzle element. It will be understood that the outlet dimensions of the nozzle element can be varied so as to provide release of a desired amount of the vapour per unit of time. It may be advantageous to provide the nozzle element with a piece of fabric encasing the nozzle or the nozzle element can suitably be provided with other cleaning means such as brushes. The tank or container for receiving the water may suitable have a cubic content in the range of 1-50 litres such as in the range of 2-10 litres. The pressure valve means should be adjustable to provide suitable pressure levels such as in the range of 1-10 bar. The effect of the heating means can suit¬ ably be in the range of 1000 to 10,000 W. In one effective embodiment of the invention, the method is one wherein the energy applied to the building material surface is in the range of 1-100 joules/cm /sec, including the range of 5-50 joules/cm 2 /sec such as at least 10 joules/cm 2 /sec. As an example, an amount of energy of about 40 joules/cm 2 /sec can be applied when a vapour generating apparatus having a container with a cubic content of about 5 litres and a heating element effect of 2200 W is used at a water temperature of about 120°C, i.e. at a pressure in excess of 2 bar. It has even been found that the thermal treatment according to the invention is highly effective with regard to fungal inactivation on uneven and irregular surfaces, assumingly due to an ability of the condensed vapour to penetrate into cracks and fissures on such surfaces. In accordance with the method of the invention, the distance between the vapour outlet nozzle element and the contaminated surface to be treated should be relatively short, such as in the range of 0-10 cm. In preferred embodiments the distance should be less than 5 cm and in more preferred embodiments the vapour outlet is in contact with the surface. The appropriate period of time where the vapour is applied to the building surface material depends on several factors, including the level of fungal contamination, the type of material and the surface structure hereof and the initial temperature of the vapour. Evidently, a rough surface may require a more prolonged treatment than a smooth surface, which treatment, however, should not be prolonged beyond the point where damages of the material in question occur. It was found in experiments that e.g. treating a wooden surface with visually recognizable fungal growth having an area of 40 cm 2 for a total of about 5 sec completely inactivated fungal propagules. In suitable embodiments of the invention the thermal energy is applied to the surface for a period of time which is in the range of 0.01-60 sec/cm 2 including a range of 0.125-10 sec/cm 2 . However, it is envisaged that particularly contaminated or particularly rough surfaces may require a more prolonged treatment, i.e. in excess of 60 sec/cm 2 . Preferably, the thermal treatment parameters should be selected so as to inactivate or kill essentially all fungal material able to propagate, i.e. propagules including spores and conidia. Accordingly, the present method is preferable one which results in killing of at least 90% of fungal propagules initially present on the building material sur¬ face. Such an inactivation rate will result in a significant reduction of the content of fungal spores in the indoor air which, as it is mentioned above, in damp buildings typically can be in the range of IO 2 to IO 5 fungal colony forming units/m 3 . A desired reduction of the air contamination is a reduction by a factor of 10-10,000 such as 100 to 1000. In order to obtain the above high rates of fungal inactivation it may be advantageous to subject the material surface to a pre-treatment step whereby fungal material present is at least partially removed from said surface. Such a pretreatment may be a conventional cleaning procedure using a liquid cleaning medium or it may be a vacuum cleaning step. Accordingly, in another preferred embodiment of the inven¬ tion, the method includes such a pre-treatment. Furthermore, it is contemplated that droplets of condensed water vapour when applied to the fungally contaminated material surface will effectively entrap fungal spores and other propagules. Accordingly, subsequent removal of such spore-carrying droplets e.g. by vacuum cleaning may be a further measure contributing to the control of indoor air fungal contamination. Therefore, the invention encompasses in a useful aspect an embodiment which comprises the further step of removing from the energy treated building material surface droplets of condensed water vapour entrapping fungal mycelia and/or spores. This may conveniently be obtained by a vacuum cleaning subsequent to the thermal treatment, optio- nally using a vacuum cleaner provided with a filter to retain fungal propagules. Although it is preferred to use a method as described herein in which the thermal energy is delivered to the material surface in the form of heated pure water vapour, it is envi- saged that it may under specific conditions be advantageous to add to the water in the vapour generating apparatus one or more additives which can contribute to the inactivation of fungal materials. Such possible additives include as examples, surface active substances including soap and deter- gents, environmentally acceptable fungistatic or fungicidal compounds, alcohols and salts. The invention is further illustrated by the following examples. EXAMPLE 1 Inactivation of fungi on floor boards A floor board, 100 x 13 cm with intensive and visually recog¬ nizable growth of fungi was collected from a damp building. The surface of the board was pre-treated by vacuum cleaning followed by applying water vapour generated by a Mondial VAP™ 3000 vapour generating apparatus providing vapour at 130°C at the nozzle. The treatment period was about 65 sec for the entire floor board. Prior to the pre-treatment, the level of viable fungal propagules on the floor board surface and the species compo- sition hereof was recorded by pressing a fungus cultivation medium in a petri dish onto the fungally contaminated board followed by incubation of the medium at 30°C for 5 days. After this incubation, the medium surface was completely covered by colonies of fungi. The distribution of fungal species growing on the medium was: Botryderma spp. 65%, Aspergillus spp. 30% and Penicillium spp. 5%. Similarly, print samples of the board after the treatment was collected (3 samples evenly distributed over the board sur¬ face) and these samples were incubated as above. None of these 3 samples revealed growth of fungi. Only a few colonies of bacteria were observed (Micrococcus spp.). It could therefore be concluded that the above thermal energy treatment had resulted in a complete inactivation of fungal propagules on the heavily contaminated floor board. The above experiment was repeated using an other floor board from the same building. The results were essentially the same. EXAMPLE 2 Decontamination of fungally contaminated wooden materials from a damp mouldy building Samples were collected of three different types of wooden materials from the building which has been empty for about one year. The samples which were all visibly contaminated with fungi were: six roof plywood sheets, five floor boards and one wooden beam. The samples were examined for microfun- gal contamination prior to treatment by using print or con¬ tact plates containing V-8 medium which is a selective medium for fungi. Two contact plates were used for each sample. Following the contact sampling, the plates were incubated at about 25°C for 5-7 days and then examined qualitatively and semi-quantitatively for growth of fungi. The fungi appearing on the plates were identified, in most cases to genus level but for some to species level using standard taxonomic cri¬ teria. The fungi detected on the samples were common airborne and dust borne fungal species and certain members of fungal groups commonly found in buildings in which damage caused by burst water pipes has occurred. The samples were pre-treated and heat treated essentially as described in Example 1 and subsequently kept in sterile petri dishes at 20-22°C with access of ambient air but with- out supply of moisture. Contact sampling as described above was repeated at the following points of time: immediately after treatment, two weeks after treatment and three months after treatment. The results of the microbiological examination of the samples are summarized in the below Tables 1-3. Table 1 Microbiological examination of plywood sheets using contact plates. Detection of microfungi. 5 Sheet No. Time of sampling Contact plate 1 Contact plate 2 Prior to treatment Moderate growth Moderate growth Penicillium spp. Penicillium spp. Ulocladium spp. Mycelia sterilia 10 Mycelia sterilia Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 3 months after treatment No growth No growth Prior to treatment Moderate growth Moderate growth 15 Alternaria spp. Alternaria spp. Penicillium spp. Penicillium spp. Trichosporon pullulans Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 20 3 months after treatment No growth Sparse growth Penicillium spp. Table 1 - continued Microbiological examination of plywood sheets using contact plates. Detection of microfungi. 5 Sheet No. Time of sampling Contact plate 1 Contact plate 2 Prior to treatment Extensive growth No growth Penicillium spp. Mycelia sterilia 10 Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 3 months after treatment No growth Sparse growth σ> Yeast Prior to treatment Moderate growth Moderate growth 15 Penicillium spp. Alternaria spp. Mycelia sterilia Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 3 months after treatment No growth No growth 20 Table 1 - continued Microbiological examination of plywood sheets using contact plates. Detection of microfungi. 5 Sheet No. Time of sampling Contact plate 1 Contact plate 2 Prior to treatment Moderate growth Moderate growth Penicillium spp. Yeast Mycelia sterilia Penicillium spp. 10 Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 3 months after treatment No growth No growth Prior to treatment Extensive growth Extensive growth Penicillium spp. dominate Alternaria spp. 15 Acremonium spp. Penicillium spp. Scopulariopsis spp. Mycelia sterilia Ulocladium spp. Mycelia sterilia Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 20 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 3 months after treatment No growth Sparse growth Mycelia sterilia Table 2 Microbiological examination of floor boards using contact plates. Detection of microfungi. 5 Board No. Time of sampling Contact plate 1 Contact plate 2 Prior to treatment Sparse growth Sparse growth Penicillium spp, Chaetomium spp. Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 10 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 3 months after treatment No growth No growth o Prior to treatment Sparse growth Sparse growth Penicillium spp. Mycelia sterilia Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 15 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 3 months after treatment No growth No growth Table 2 - continued Microbiological examination of floor boards using contact plates. Detection of microfungi. 5 Board No. Time of sampling Contact plate 1 Contact plate 2 Prior to treatment Sparse/moderate growth Sparse/moderate growth Penicillium spp. Penicillium spp. Mycelia sterilia Mycelia sterilia 10 Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 3 months after treatment No growth No growth Prior to treatment Moderate growth Moderate growth Alternaria spp. Chaetomium spp. 15 Aspergillus ochraceus Mycelia sterilia Penicillium spp. Mycelia sterilia Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 20 3 months after treatment No growth No growth Table 2 - continued Microbiological examination of floor boards using contact plates. Detection of microfungi. 5 Board No. Time of sampling Contact plate 1 Contact plate 2 Prior to treatment Sparse growth Sparse growth Aureobasidium pullulans Aspergillus spp. Rhizopus nigricans Mycelia sterilia 10 Stachybotrys chartarum Mycelia sterilia Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 3 months after treatment No growth No growth 15 Table 3 Microbiological examination of wooden beam using contact plates. Detection of microfungi. Time of sampling Contact plate 1 Contact plate 2 Prior to treatment Extensive growth Extensive growth Penicillium spp. dominate Penicillium spp. dominate Mycelia sterilia Aspergillus spp. 10 Mycelia sterilia Immediately after treatment No growth No growth 2 weeks after treatment No growth No growth 3 months after treatment Sparse growth Sparse growth Phoma-like Chaetomium spp. 15 Prior to the treatment, two out of six plywood sheets showed extensive fungal contamination and the remaining four sheets moderate contamination; one out of five floor boards was moderately contaminated and four were sparsely contaminated; and the wooden beam was extensively contaminated. Immediately after treatment and two weeks after treatments, no microfungal contamination could be detected on any of the samples. Three months after treatment sparse fungal growth was detected on a few of the contact plate samples. However, in no instance was this fungal growth after three months of keeping the treated samples macroscopically detectable. Thus, it could be concluded that the applied thermal energy treatment had resulted in a removal and/or inactivation of the fungal growth on and/or below the surfaces of the exa- mined building materials removed from a damp building and that fungal growth did not reappear within two weeks even if the samples were kept under conditions permitting fungal propagules to begin to grow.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method of improving the indoor air quality in a building whose occupant(s) has/have symptoms ascribable to fungal contamination, the method comprising at least partially inactivating fungal mycelia and spores associated with a building material surface by applying onto said surface thermal energy initially contained in water vapour at a pressure exceeding 1 bar, in an amount which is sufficient to at least partially inactivate said fungal mycelia and spores but essentially without causing damages to the surface material. 2. A method according to claim 1 wherein there is visually recognizable fungal growth on the building material surface. 3. A method according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the thermal energy is applied by releasing pressurized water vapour onto the building material surface whereby the thermal energy is derived from a transition of the state of the water vapour from the gaseous to the liquid state at a temperature in the range of 90-110°C. 4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the energy applied to the building material surface is at least 10 joules/cm 2 /sec. 5. A method according to claim 3 wherein the energy is applied to the building material surface by releasing the water vapour to the surface at a distance from said surface which is at the most 10 cm. 6. A method according to any of claims 1-5 wherein the ther¬ mal energy is applied to the surface for a period of time which is in the range of 0.01-60 sec/cm 2 . 7. A method according to claim 1 wherein the building material surface is selected from a roof construction sur- face, a ceiling, a floor, a surface defining a crawl space, a wall surface and a surface which is not immediately acces¬ sible. 8. A method according to claim 7 wherein the building material is provided with a surface covering including a covering comprising an organic substance. 9. A method according to claim 1 which results in killing of at least 90% of fungal propagules initially present on the building material surface. 10. A method according to claim 1 which comprises as a pre¬ treatment of the building material surface a step whereby fungal material is at least partially removed from said surface. 11. A method according to claim 1 which comprises the further step of removing from the thermal energy treated building material surface droplets of condensed water vapour entrap¬ ping fungal mycelia and/or spores.

Inventors: NIELSEN KLAUS, NIELSEN, KLAUS
Applicants: MICRO CLEAN AS, NIELSEN KLAUS, MICRO CLEAN A/S, NIELSEN, KLAUS
Application year: 1997
Main classification: A01M19
IPC codes: A01M19, A01M21