METHOD FOR HOT GAS CONDITIONING

Abstract: A method for cracking and shifting a synthesis gas by the steps of providing a catalyst consisting essentially of alumina in a reaction zone; contacting the catalyst with a substantially oxygen free mixture of gases comprising water vapor and hydrocarbons having one or more carbon atoms, at a temperature between 530 DEG C (1000 DEG F) to 980 DEG C (1800 DEG F); and wherein the hydrocarbons are cracked to form hydrogen, carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide and hydrogen content of the mixture increases with a corresponding decrease in carbon monoxide, and carbon formation is substantially eliminated.

Description: METHOD FOR HOT GAS CONDITIONING STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST This invention was made with government support under Contract No. YM-2-11110-1 awarded by the Department of Energy. The Government of the United States of America has certain rights in this invention. FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention includes a method of using an alumina catalyst for shifting and cracking an input gas to provide a feed gas suitable for hydrocarbon synthesis (e.g. methanol synthesis). The method allows the reaction with minimum or substantially no carbonization and with higher yields than heretofore possible. Further, the method does not require the use of metals such as nickel or molybdenum that are hazardous to the environment. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The production of a feed gas for hydrogen synthesis using gasification requires the use of a catalyst to adjust the hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio by the water gas shift reaction, CO + H 2 O → CO 2 + H 2 and, if alcohols are the desired product, to crack hydrocarbons to a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, by the reaction, C.H m + (n/2)O : → nCO + (m/2)H 2 Both of these reactions must be done in such a way as to not promote the formation of carbon, an undesired byproduct. Conventional catalyst systems and methods for these reactions require the use of noble metals such as nickel, molybdenum, and the like, or of alkali materials such as potassium, sodium, and the like. Further, conventional catalyst systems and methods do not suppress carbon to the desired extent. Typical of these and other gas production operations are the following U.S. patents 233,861 to Jerzmanowski; 1,295,825 to Ellis; 1 ,875,923 to Harrison; 1,903,845 to Wilcox; 1,977,684 to Lucke; 1 ,992,909 to Davis; 2,405,395 to Bahike et al; 2,546,606; 3,922,337 to Campbell et al; 4,726,913 to Brophy et al; 4,888, 131 to Goetsch et al; 5,143,647 to Say et al; and British patent GB 461,402 (Feb. 16, 1937). SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The first embodiment of the invention typically includes a method for cracking and shifting a synthesis gas by providing a catalyst consisting essentially of alumina; and contacting the catalyst with the synthesis gas comprising a substantially oxygen free mixture of gases of water vapor and hydrocarbons having one or more carbon atoms, at a temperature between 530 * C (1000 'F) to 980 ' C (1800 " F); wherein the hydrocarbons are cracked to form hydrogen, carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide and the hydrogen content of the mixture shifted so as to increase with a corresponding decrease in carbon monoxide, and wherein carbon formation is substantially eliminated. A further embodiment of the invention typically includes a method for cracking and shifting a synthesis gas by providing a catalyst consisting essentially of alumina; contacting the alumina catalyst with a substantially oxygen free synthesis gas of: methane and/or higher hydrocarbons; and water vapor; at a temperature of about 530 ' C to about 980 "C, wherein methane and higher hydrocarbons are cracked according to the reaction, C x H 2y + xH 2 O = xCO + (l +y + x)H 2 , and shifted by the reaction, CO + H 2 O = CO : + H 2 , and wherein carbon formation is substantially eliminated. A yet further embodiment of the invention typically includes a method for cracking and shifting a substantially oxygen free synthesis gas comprising: (a) providing a reaction zone with a catalyst consisting essentially of alumina: (b) flowing the synthesis gas into the reaction zone and contacting the catalyst; (c) simultaneously with step b, flowing 0 to about 80 volume percent water vapor into contact with the catalyst; at a temperature of about 530 " C to about 980 ' C, wherein methane and higher hydrocarbons in the synthesis gas are cracked according to the reaction, C.H 2v + xH 2 O = xCO + (l +y + x)H 2 , SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26V and shifted by the reaction, CO + H 2 O = CO 2 + H 2 , and wherein carbon formation is substantially eliminated. The above embodiments typically can provide that the contacting is carried out in a fluidized bed reactor, or in a recirculating fluidized bed gasifier, or in a fixed bed reactor. A further embodiment of the invention typically includes a method for cracking and shifting a synthesis gas comprising: (a) providing a catalyst consisting essentially of granulated alumina; (b) contacting the catalyst with the synthesis gas comprising a substantially oxygen free mixture of gases of water vapor and hydrocarbons having one or more carbon atoms, at a temperature between about 530 * C (1000 * F) to about 980'C (1800 ° F); (d) circulating the catalyst between a gasifier where the contacting is accomplished, and a combustor where the catalyst is heated to maintain the temperatures when the catalyst is recirculated to the gasifier; and wherein the hydrocarbons are cracked to form hydrogen, carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide and the hydrogen content of the mixture increases with a corresponding decrease in carbon monoxide, and wherein carbon formation is substantially eliminated. The above embodiments can typically provide that the substantially oxygen free mixture of gases also contains carbon monoxide and/or hydrogen. They typically have a gaseous hourly space velocity greater than about 1000 m 3 /m 3 -hr that can go up to about 5000 m 3 /m 3 -hr, and can typically complete the cracking and shifting reactions in one reaction zone. Typically the temperature is preferably between about 650 'C to about 870'C. The invention typically also provides for new uses for alumina. A composition consisting essentially of alumina is able to be used in catalytic reactions where only combinations of materials often hazardous to dispose of have been used. The new use in catalytic reactions provides results equal to or better than the previous materials without the attendant disposal problems. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 illustrates the gasifier and reactor arrangement used for the examples herein. Figure 2 illustrates a typical reactor for the method of the invention. Figure 3 is a graphical representation of the data from Table II plotted to show the HJCO ratio in the Y-axis versus the inlet steam concentration in volume percent in the X-axis. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION AND BEST MODE One aspect of the invention involves hot-gas conditioning of synthetic gas produced from an indirectly fired gasification process. This process utilizes a circulating stream of hot sand as an indirect heat transfer agent to perform the gasification reactions. Almost any carbonaceous feedstock to the gasifier is useful with the present invention. Typical examples of useful feedstocks include coal, lignite, peat, municipal waste, wood, energy plantation crops, agricultural and forestry residues, and the like. When biomass feedstocks are used, the inherently high reactivity of the biomass feedstocks allows such an indirect heating method to be readily adapted for gasification in a short residence time reactor system such as a circulating fluid bed. A medium-Btu gas, that is useful for chemical synthesis, is produced; however, the method herein applies to all manner of feedstocks and gasifiers. The reaction chamber used for the present invention can be installed directly after the output of the gasifier as shown in Figure 1. Another aspect of the invention is the use of hot-gas conditioning as a means of producing an enhanced synthesis gas for subsequent chemical production. In gasification, the carbonaceous feedstock is converted into a mixture of gases that can later be used as a clean, gaseous fuel for heating, power generation, or as a feedstock for chemical synthesis. Chemical synthesis generally requires the use of a medium Btu (non-nitrogen diluted) gas with minimal contaminants for optimum conversion to chemicals. Medium-Btu gas containing primarily CO and H 2 can be generated using oxygen as the gasifying medium in a single- vessel gasification process, but the costs of pure oxygen are high. Alternatively, the gas can be generated by heating the biomass materials indirectly with a circulating heat carrier. The resulting gas is nitrogen free, as in the oxygen blown case, and can contain some level of hydrocarbons in addition to the CO and H 2 . For medium-Btu gases to be used for chemical synthesis, the gas composition is modified to provide the proper ratio of the synthesis gas constituents hydrogen and carbon monoxide, and to reduce hydrocarbon species that can reduce the effectiveness of conversion catalysts. One common chemical product from such synthesis reactions is methanol. Methanol shows considerable promise as an alternative transportation fuel. The production of methanol from medium-Btu gas is technically feasible using current processing methods, however, the cost is not competitive with conventional fuels. One major area in which cost reductions can be realized is in the preparation of the medium-Btu gas prior to methanol synthesis. Such preparation includes hydrocarbon (tar) destruction, methane reforming, and water-gas shift reactions. To achieve optimum overall process efficiencies, these reactions should take place as hot-gas conditioning operations integrated with the gasifier. Preferably, a gas conditioning catalyst that is employed can destroy or minimize hydrocarbons in the gas and shift the H : to CO ratio of the gas to 2: 1 or higher. The method described herein provides this function. A fluidized bed gasifier system 100 having the arrangement of Figure 1 was utilized as the source of a stable supply of synthesis gas. These gasifiers are well known in the art, see U.S. patent 4,828,581. A gasifier 110 is heated by sand, or other material (including the catalyst discussed herein), circulated between the gasifier 110 and a combustor 120. Output synthesis gas from the gasifier 110 flows to fluidized bed reaction chamber 200 by input line 216. The synthesis gas contained all of the trace constituents that might be present in a commercial scale gasification system. A fluidized bed reaction chamber 200, shown in detail in Figure 2. was installed at the output of a typical fluidized bed gasifier system 100. The catalyst reaction zone 210 was 15.24 cm (6 inches) in diameter and utilized a catalyst bed 212 having a depth of 25.4 cm (10 inches). A 25.4 cm ( 10 inches) diameter disengaging zone 220 was provided directly above the catalyst reaction zone 210 SUBSTTTUTE SHEET (RULE 26) to minimize entrainment of catalyst particles 213. Gas entered from inlet 216 and exited at outlet 226. A perforated plate 214 was used to uniformly distribute the synthesis gas. Means for adding additional steam 218 to the synthesis gas with the feed at the input to the reaction chamber was made so that higher water vapor to carbon levels than those present in the entering gas could be achieved. The gaseous hourly space velocity (GHSV) chosen for the test reactions was about 2000 m 3 /m 3 -hr. Gas inlet lines for inlet 216 were installed to reflect this nominal design flow rate. Typically, gaseous hourly space velocities of greater than about 1000 m 3 /m 3 -hr are preferred. An upper limit for gaseous hourly space velocities of about 5000 m 3 /m 3 -hr is preferred. Most preferred are gaseous hourly space velocities of about 1000 m 3 /m 3 , hr to about 3000 m 3 /m 3 -hr. Temperatures of about 530 'C to about 980 "C are useful in the method herein, although temperatures between about 650 "C to about 870 "C are preferred. The water vapor or steam concentration may be up to 80 vol . Pressures between 1 atmosphere and about 40 atmospheres are satisfactory for the reaction. A second identical chamber (not shown) connected in parallel with the first reaction chamber 100 was added for comparison tests in Examples H17 through S26 so that two catalyst samples could be directly compared. Two materials were tested during the hot-gas conditioning tests. A first catalyst material, designated DN34, is a pure alumina (99.9% pure) available from Johnson-Matthey, Bradford, MA, U.S.A. was used for the baseline tests. This material, was ground to a 12x40 mesh size so it could be fluidized in the catalyst chamber 200. The DN34 alumina is a low cost material and is disposable without hazardous designations as is the case with other catalyst systems such as those containing nickel. The second of these was a nickel based cracking catalyst from ICI. Katalco. Two Transcam Plaza Drive, Oak Brook Terrace, IL. 60181 and was designated ICI-46- 1. The catalyst was an extruded material made by co- precipitation, the resulting clay-like material was then extruded and fired. The ICI-46-1 catalyst used for these tests was crushed and screened to provide a suitable material for fluidized bed testing. No change in the metal loading of the catalyst was evident as a result of the grinding operation. A particle size range of 16x40 mesh was chosen for the ICI-46-1 catalyst. There is no practical difference in performance between the 16x40 and 12x40 mesh sizes. The results of the tests with both of these catalyst materials follows. The initial tests (Tests H10 to HI 8) with the catalyst, DN34 were designed to develop a baseline performance level with this catalyst material. During these tests no additional steam was added to the incoming synthesis gas over that present at the exit of the gasifier. The synthesis gas fed to the catalyst chamber was taken from the fluidized bed gasifier outlet line where the gas has not been cooled and was fed through a heat traced line to maintain its temperature at approximately 590°C to 650°C. This slip stream was small in relation to the total synthesis gas stream and so a stable flow of gas could be provided to the reaction chamber 200 regardless of slight changes in synthesis gas production rates in the gasifier 110. In the examples below, Example numbers beginning with "H" indicate a hybrid poplar feed to the gasifier, while "S" indicates a switch grass feed. To generate data on catalyst life the same catalyst bed was used for all of the tests run with hybrid poplar (Examples H10 through HI 8). The catalyst was heated and cooled in a nitrogen atmosphere and not exposed to air unless it was at room temperature. No pre-reduction step was utilized for any of the tests with DN34. During these tests, approximately 50 hours of total operation were achieved. Example H17 further verified the stability of DN34 through operation over an 8 hour testing period. The DN34 catalyst showed a high level of tar destruction as well as a high level of water gas shift activity during the tests run. C. + hydrocarbons were essentially eliminated from the incoming synthesis gas during all tests except those run at low temperature 650°C. Water gas shift reactivity remained high throughout the tests with the catalyst. The reaction results with the DN34 catalyst are shown in Table 1 below. Comparing these results with the water concentrations in the synthesis gas, shown in Table IV below, shows that at higher steam concentrations in the synthesis gas, a higher H 2 to CO ratio can be realized at the outlet of the catalyst chamber. Examples H14 and H15 represent the low steam concentration tests (25 to 30 percent) while Example H16 represents a high steam concentration test (47 percent). These results are summarized in Table II and are shown graphically in Figure 3. Figure 3 is plotted to show the H 2 /CO ratio in the Y-axis versus the inlet steam concentration in volume percent in the X-axis. As shown, at higher inlet steam concentrations, higher levels of shift can be achieved, assuming sufficient CO is present for reaction. This verifies the use of DN34 and therefore alumina as a shift catalyst. These target values were used as a guideline in establishing test conditions for the fluidized bed gasifier 110 for Examples S22 through S26. In general, these conditions were achieved with the exception of the high steam level which was 60 to 65 percent during the tests. Higher temperatures coupled with higher steam rates and lower space velocities resulted in higher conversion levels. Example S22-2, run with high temperature 820°C, high steam content (64.9 percent), and low space velocity (1500 m 3 /m 3 , hr) showed that over 80 percent of the available CO was shifted to H 2 and 40 percent of the methane in the incoming synthesis gas was destroyed. No degradation of the catalyst was evident during the test or in subsequent tests at this temperature. Commercial cracking catalysts tend to lose activity at temperatures above about 760°C. Higher temperatures, higher steam content, and lower space velocities in general provide higher levels of activity while lower temperatures, steam levels, and higher space velocities tend to decrease reaction. In Example HI 8-1 there was no catalyst present in one of the parallel chambers to confirm that the catalysts were indeed the source of the activity and not the piping or the stainless steel reactor walls. As shown in Table I. the inlet and outlet gas compositions were essentially the same verifying the catalytic effect of the DN34 catalyst. Table I. Catalyst Testing Results Gas Chromatograph Data (vol%) CΛ CO 5 rπ CO -E rπ _XJ r 10 TABLE II. SUMMARY OF WATER GAS SHIFT DATA—DN34 CATALYST CO c= 00 10 CO cz ro 3 15 20 * GHSV - gaseous hourly space velocity, m 3/ / -m3•hr TABLE III. GAS CHROMATOGRAPH RESULTS - DN34 CATALYST TESTING SWITCH GRASS FEEDSTOCK 10 ZE 3 ro 55 15 20 * GHSV - gaseous hourly space veloci ty, m 3 //_m3 « hr CO cz CO CO 10 co m 30 rπ 15 ro - O 20 GHSV - gaseous hourly space velocity, m ,3/ι_m3«hr 25 A nickel-based commercial cracking catalyst was acquired from ICI- Katalco. The manufacturer's designation for this catalyst is ICI-46-1. The catalyst is a supported nickel oxide catalyst that has been promoted with potash to prevent the formation and accumulation of carbon during steam reforming reactions. The catalyst is shipped as rashig rings. These rings were crushed to provide the appropriate panicle size for fluidized bed operation. The manufacturer's startup and conditioning procedures were followed. The startup procedure reduces the nickel oxide to nickel metal and removes sulfur from the surface of the catalyst. This is necessary since the catalyst is shipped in the sulfided state to protect the active metal from contamination. Examples with the ICI-46-1 catalyst in place were run during fluidized bed gasifier Examples H17-2 and H18-1. The catalyst showed a significant reduction in activity from Example HI 7-2 to Example HI 8-1 as evidenced by the methane concentration in the outgoing synthesis gas. Table I shows that the methane concentration at the exit of the catalyst chamber rose from 0.53 percent to 6.64 percent in Examples HI 7-2 and HI 8-1 , respectively. Steam concentrations and catalyst bed temperatures were approximately the same for both of these tests. A somewhat higher space velocity was utilized during Example HI 7-2 (2666 versus 2530 in Example HI 8-1) which further confirms the loss in activity. Temperatures during the tests with ICI-46-1 were within the recommended operating temperature range suggested by the manufacturer, who lists temperatures up to 1000°C when used in combination with other catalysts as would be the case in a methanol system or 850°C when used alone. Steam concentrations in the incoming synthesis gas were likewise within the recommended range for this catalyst. The reduction in activity, therefore, was not caused by any external variables, but rather was a characteristic levelling off of activity during the initial hours of operation of the catalyst. The IC1-46-1 catalyst is a highly specific cracking catalyst. As such, it exhibited very little water gas shift activity as shown by the CO concentrations at the exit of the catalyst chamber. To provide the proper H to CO ratio using ICI- 46- 1 as a hot-gas conditioning catalyst will require a second water-gas shift catalyst chamber separate from a first reaction chamber to accomplish the water gas shift. Such a second chamber will increase the capital and operating costs of commercial scale methanol production. The ICI-46-1 catalyst is specifically designed to be effective in cracking hydrocarbons with boiling points up to 220°C. The tests run in the fluidized bed gasifier verified this design criteria. The reduction in tar concentration from the incoming synthesis gas was less than that evident with the DN34 catalyst as shown in Table IV below. For example, the hydrogen:carbon monoxide ration in the synthesis gas was raised from 0.7: 1 to over 2.0: 1 and tar content of the synthesis gas was reduced an order of magnitude or more by use of the DN34 catalyst. The concentration of higher hydrocarbons such as tar (condensable species) in the synthesis gas fed to the reaction chamber 200 and the concentration of condensables in the outlet 226 from the reaction chamber 200 was determined. The results of these sample collections are provided in Table IV. As shown, in each case, a significant reduction of the condensable material in the outlet gas stream was evident as a result of passing through the catalyst chamber 200. In all cases, the tar concentration was reduced by an order of magnitude or more regardless of the catalyst used. Inlet tar concentration depended in most cases on the type of feed material being gasified. For example, the tars produced from switch grass (Examples S21 and S26) were less than 50 percent of those produced with the hybrid poplar (Examples H10 to H18). Tar production from hybrid poplar was about 0.016 kg/m 3 or approximately 1 percent of the dry weight of wood fed to the gasifier 110. The switch grass production rate was about 0.0080 kg/m 3 or approximately 0.5 percent of the dry feed rate. Table IV. Tar Collection Results Hybrid Poplar Feed to Gasifier Table IV (Continued). Tar Collection Results Hybrid Poplar Feed to Gasifier Six additional examples illustrate the invention further The first five, Examples Wl to W5, used the reaction chambers 200 as described above The sixth example, Example W6 (A and B), used the catalyst as a circulating phase in place of sand in the fluidized bed gasifier system 100 Operation with the catalyst as a circulating phase can eliminate the need for a downstream reactor system which will result in reduced capital and operating costs Table V summarizes the results of tests Wl through W5. The catalyst chambers previously utilized above were connected essentially as before The same gaseous hourly space velocity to the catalyst chamber of approximately 2000 m 3 /m 3 -hr was also used. The catalyst chamber temperature was controlled at approximately 820°C and no additional steam was added as part of the feed gas The operating temperature of the gasifier 1 10 and catalyst 213 are shown in the table. Catalyst DN34 as above was used as well as catalyst DN40 (a similar material made by Girdler, a catalyst manufacturer) and is an alumina support material with no impregnation. Catalyst DN 50 is a fused alumina from Norton (a refractory supplier) and provides a measurement of the effect of internal surface area on the catalyst activity Conventional wisdom would indicate that a reduction in internal surface would result in no catalytic activity of the material As an indication of the effectiveness of the catalyst formulations as cracking catalysts, the conversion of ethane (C : H 6 ) was monitored. During earlier examples discussed above (H series and S series), ethane conversion was found to, in most cases, parallel the conversion of the tar constituents in the gas Detailed measurements of tar conversion were not made in the following examples, however, visual observation of the gas chromatograph sample lines indicated that tar was greatly reduced when compared with the raw synthesis gas from the gasifier 110 Another significant measure of the catalysts activity is the water gas shift activity These tests showed activity ranging trom 22 to 77 % The fused material gave the lowest activity and the DN34 material, the highest E\en 227c activity is significant and can potentially be improved by use of alternate test conditions Table V. Alumina Catalyst Example Wl Through W5 Data 19 - Table V (Continued). Alumina Catalyst Example Wl Through W5 Data 10 15 20 Another embodiment of the invention involves the use of the alumina catalyst as a recirculating phase. By this method hot-gas conditioning can be greatly simplified and economics can be improved by the possible elimination of the hot-gas conditioning unit operation. The alumina should be ground or granulated so as to act in the same manner as the heat transfer agent that it partially or completely replaces. The granulated alumina will preferably be of a size and density to provide a balance between catalytic characteristics, heat transfer characteristics, and flowability. Gasifier 110 conditions were controlled at approximately 820°C and steam input of approximately 1 kg per kg of feedstock (wood) fed to maximize the water vapor in the synthesis gas. Operation in this mode allowed the reactor chamber 200 operation to be made without the addition of steam to the incoming synthesis gas. In the examples herein it was noted that the ground alumina used did not flow as well as the sand that it replaced, thus the particles are preferably free flowing particles having flow characteristics adapted to recirculating systems, i.e. similar to or better than sand. Table VI shows examples using DN34 as a circulating bed material. Here, as in the previous tests, definite water gas shift activity is noticed as well as conversion of ethane. Two different temperature levels were possible in these tests and the gas compositions are compared with those obtained during previous tests without the catalyst circulating phase to establish the activity levels. Even at the lower temperature in Example W6-B a significant increase in hydrogen is noticed, illustrating significant shift activity. - 21 - Table VI. Catalyst Example W6 Data Use of DN 34 as a Circulating Phase A further benefit of hot-gas conditioning, when applied to advanced power generation cycles such as those including fuel cells, is that the hydrogen content of the gas can be increase. Fuel cell applications require high hydrogen content fuel gases. By using catalyst DN34, the hydrogen content of the product gas can be raised to a level so that no further water gas shift reaction is necessary in the fuel cell system. The product gas leaving most biomass gasifiers, including the herein descried gasifier, has a hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio much less than 2: 1 and in some cases less than 1 : 1. The ratio can be adjusted by the water gas shift reaction shown in the equation above. This reaction requires the presence of a catalyst to enhance the reaction rates. Catalyst DN34 is effective in enhancing the water gas shift reaction to produce a gas with a high hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio as further illustrated in Table VII below. With a hydrogen content in excess of 60% no further conversion of carbon monoxide to hydrogen would be necessary for fuel cell applications. Catalyst temperature was elevated above the gasifier temperature by 50°C during the tests for the date of Table VII to enhance the water gas shift reactions. Table VII. Water Gas Shift Results With Catalyst DN34 The invention has been tested under actual biomass gasification conditions in two separate reactor systems. These systems were, a 6 inch ( cm) diameter slip stream reactor and a 36 inch diameter "full flow" reactor designed to process the complete output from a high throughput gasifier. Both reactors were operated as fluidized beds with superficial velocities of 30.5 cm/sec. Gaseous hourly space velocities expressed as m 3 gas /m 3 cala ι ysl .hr (at operating conditions), were controlled between 1500 m 3 /m 3 -hr and 2500 m 3 /m 3 -hr for the experiments of Tables VII and VIII. During the tests, tar concentration in the product gas was measured by sampling using a modified method 5 (MM5) train. The MM5 train consist of a series of five impingers placed in an ice bath followed by a dry gas meter to measure the quantity of gas sampled. After sampling, the impringers were rinsed with toluene to remove tars and water collected. Toluene and water were removed from the samples by hearing in an oven at 65 °C overnight. Tar concentration at the inlet and outlet of the catalyst bed was then compared to determine tar destruction efficiencies. Table VIII below shows the significant improvement in the quality of the gas that can be realized. The data for Table VIII were generated using the catalyst in both the smaller slip stream reactor and the full flow catalyst reactor. Table VIII. Comparison of Hot Gas Conditioning for Both the Slip Stream and Full Flow Reactors * - greenwood feedstock With all of the materials tested, alumina continued to show activity as both a cracking and shift catalyst. The alumina provides significant advantages in terms of initial cost and disposal cost because of the elimination of noble metals from the catalyst. While the forms of the invention herein disclosed constitute presently preferred embodiments, many others are possible. It is not intended herein to mention all of the possible equivalent forms or ramification of the invention. It is to be understood that the terms used herein are merely descriptive, rather than limiting, and that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit of the scope of the invention.

Claims: CLAIMS What is claimed is: 1. A method for cracking and shifting a synthesis gas comprising: a. providing a catalyst consisting essentially of alumina; b. contacting said catalyst with said synthesis gas comprising a substantially oxygen free mixture of gases of water vapor and hydrocarbons having one or more carbon atoms, at a temperature between 530°C (1000°F) to 980°C (1800°F); and wherein said hydrocarbons are cracked to form hydrogen, carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide and the hydrogen content of said mixture shifted so as to increase with a corresponding decrease in carbon monoxide, and wherein carbon formation is substantially eliminated. 2. A method for cracking and shifting a synthesis gas comprising: a. providing a catalyst consisting essentially of alumina; b. contacting said catalyst with a substantially oxygen free synthesis gas comprising: (1) methane and /or higher hydrocarbons; and (2 water vapor; at a temperature of 530°C to 980°C, wherein methane and higher hydrocarbons are cracked according to the reaction, C x H 2y + xH 2 O = xCO + (l +y + x)H 2 , and wherein carbon formation is substantially eliminated. 3. A method for cracking and shifting a substantially oxygen free synthesis gas comprising: a. providing a reaction zone with a catalyst consisting essentially of alumina; b. flowing said synthesis gas into said reaction zone and contacting said catalyst; c. simultaneously with step b.. flowing 0 to 80 volume percent water vapor into contact with said catalyst; at a temperature of 530°C to 980°C, wherein methane and higher hydrocarbons in said synthesis gas are cracked according to the reaction, C x H 2y + H 2 O = xCO + (l +y+x)H 2 , and shifted by the reaction, CO + H 2 0 = CO 2 + H 2 , and wherein carbon formation is substantially eliminated. 4. A method for cracking and shifting a synthesis gas comprising: a. providing a catalyst consisting essentially of granulated alumina; b. contacting said catalyst with said synthesis gas comprising a substantially oxygen free mixture of gases of water vapor and hydrocarbons having one or more carbon atoms, at a temperature between 530°C (1000°F) to 980°C (1800°F); c. circulating said catalyst between a gasifier where said contacting is accomplished, and a combustor where said catalyst is heated to maintain said temperatures when said catalyst is recirculated to said gasifier; and wherein said hydrocarbons are cracked to form hydrogen, carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide and said hydrogen content of said mixture increases with a corresponding decrease in carbon monoxide, and wherein carbon formation is substantially eliminated. 5. The method of Claim 1 , 2, 3 or 4 wherein said substantially oxygen free mixture of gases further comprises carbon monoxide and/or hydrogen. 6 The method of Claim 1 , 2, 3 or 4 further comprising a gaseous hourly space velocity greater than 1000 m 3 /m 3 -hr to 5000 mVm 3 -hr. 7. The method of Claim 1 , 2, 3 or 4 comprising completing said cracking and shifting reaction in one reaction zone. 8. The method of Claim 1, 2, 3 or 4 wherein said contacting is carried out in a fluidized bed reactor. 9. The method of Claim 1 , 2, 3 or 4 wherein said contacting is carried out in a recirculating fluidized bed gasifier. 10. The method of Claim 1, 2, 3 or 4 wherein said contacting is carried out in a fixed bed reactor. 11. The method of Claim 1, 2, 3 or 4 wherein said temperature is between 650°C to 870°C. 12. The method of Claim 1, 2, 3 or 4 wherein the H 2 /CO ratio is controlled by adjusting the amount of water vapor. 13. The method of Claim 1, 2, 3 or 4 wherein the H 2 /CO ratio is shifted to 2: 1 or higher. 14. Every novel feature or novel combination of features disclosed in the specification, or abstract of this application. SUBSTTTUTE SHEET (RULE 26)

Inventors: PAISLEY MARK A, PAISLEY, MARK, A.
Applicants: BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE, PAISLEY MARK A, PAISLEY, MARK, A.
Application year: 1996
Main classification: C01B3
IPC codes: C01B3