BENCH TOP UV-ACTIVATED ODOR FILTRATION DEVICE

Abstract: The invention relates to an apparatus for purifying air by means of an activated photocatalyst such as titanium dioxide, the apparatus comprises a housing (1) having inlet (2) and outlet (4) for circulating air, a circulating means (5) such as a fan, is mounted in the housing to circulate air, a planar filter (7) disposed across the path of circulating air, the filter including a photocatalyst fixed to a fibrous porous support, and a light source (13) mounted in the housing to activate the photocatalyst; the invention provides a compact apparatus which can readily fit on a table or laboratory bench, and can quickly reduce air-borne contaminants such as odors.

Description: BENCH TOP UV-ACTTVATED ODOR FILTRATION DEVICE Background of the Invention Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for removing odors, or other air-borne contaminants, from air. Discussion of the Art Air in enclosed spaces becomes stale or develops odors owing to contamination by substances such as volatile organic compounds, mold and inorganic compounds. In hospitals, anesthetic gases and toxic sterilizing compounds, such as ethylene oxide, can accumulate in the air. In smaller spaces, such as the interiors of cars, trucks and aircraft, accumulation of contaminants, for example from construction or furnishing material, can be more of a problem. Tobacco combustion also contributes to contamination. Treatment of contaminated air has focused on removal of solid particles, such as by filtration, adsorption onto activated carbon or electrostatic precipitation. Such solid removal merely transfers the contaminant from one place to another. In the case of activated carbon, which is a common choice for such removal, the contaminants are adsorbed onto the carbon surface which eventually becomes saturated and must be replaced. Some contaminants, such as low molecular weight gaseous compounds, are not satisfactorily adsorbed or are easily desorbed. Further, efficiency of contaminant removal decreases at elevated temperatures. Of the many requirements of an air remediating apparatus, a few are of fundamental importance and are not achieved by commercially available systems. These requirements are the ability to handle a variety of contaminants simultaneously at room temperature and under prolonged, long term operation. Recently photocatalysis has been used to remove contaminants. Contaminated air is passed over or through a photocatalyst irradiated with a suitable light source. Anatase titanium dioxide (TiO-,) is a common form of photocatalyst and is suitably irradiated with UV light at room temperature. Photocatalytic treatment using titanium dioxide removes low molecular weight organic and inorganic gaseous compounds faster than activated carbon at continuous operation and has the advantage that the contaminants are generally broken down into harmless, odorless or less toxic compounds. U.S. Patent No. 5,045,288 (Raupp et al.) discloses an apparatus which uses photocatalysis to remove contaminants from water. The water is pumped through a bed of photocatalyst irradiated by UV light through UV-transparent walls of a reaction vessel. Although such an arrangement might be modified for use with air instead of water, the large reaction chamber, which is needed for the catalyst bed and the loose catalyst, make such an apparatus unsuitable for small spaces such as rooms. Further, the back-pressure or resistance created by the catalyst impedes the treatment of large volumes of contaminated air and therefore would require powerful equipment to be effective for contaminant removal. U.S. Patent No. 4,892,712 (Robertson et al.) discloses an apparatus for removal of contaminants from fluids which uses photocatalysis. The apparatus surrounds a UV tube with a cylindrical matrix containing the photocatalyst. The UV tube and matrix are in turn enclosed in a cylindrical fluid-tight jacket having a small fluid inlet tube, perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the cylindrical jacket, at one end of the apparatus and a corresponding fluid outlet tube at the other end of the apparatus. Although the apparatus is described as being useful for both gases and liquids, this apparatus would not be effective for removing contaminants quickly from the air in a room or laboratory. The back-pressure generated by moving air along the length of the matrix would require a pump or fan inconveniently large. There is a need for arrangements which are suitable to decontaminate or remove odors from small spaces such as rooms in hospitals, houses or laboratories or interiors of vehicles such as cars, trucks or airplanes. To be suitable for smaller spaces, the decontaminating equipment should be able to treat large volumes of air quickly without being too large or cumbersome. Preferably such equipment could be placed on a bench or table and quickly remove unpleasant or harmful contaminants. Summary of the Invention According to one aspect of the invention there is provided an apparatus for purifying air comprising a housing having an air inlet and an air outlet; a circulating means, mounted in the housing, to circulate air from outside the housing through the inlet along an air flow path inside the housing and out of the outlet; a planar filter means disposed across the path of circulating air, said filter means comprising a photocatalyst fixed to a fibrous porous support; and a light source mounted in the housing to direct light onto the filter means to activate the photocatalyst. Brief Description of the Drawings The invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings showing, by way of example, embodiments of the invention and elements thereof. Figure 1 is a partially cut-away schematic side view of an apparatus according to the invention; Figure 2 is a front view of the embodiment of Figure 1; Figure 3 is a partially cut-away schematic side view as in Figure 1, but showing the pivoted rear portion in an open position; Figure 4 is an exploded view of a filter cartridge containing a filter suitable for use in the apparatus of Figure 1 ; Figures 5 and 6 are front and side views respectively of the filter cartridge of Figure 4; Figures 7, 8 and 9 are exploded views of different embodiments of a filter suitable for use in the apparatus of Figure 1. Detailed Description of the Invention In a preferred embodiment the air flow path has an upstream portion in which air flows in one direction and an adjacent downstream portion in which air flows in the opposite direction and the planar filter means is disposed in the housing such that the filter means extends across the upstream and downstream portions. The housing provides a path for the air to circulate and a structure on which the other elements such as the light source and the circulating means can be mounted. The housing may be plastic or metal or other suitable structural material. Besides the inlet and outlet, the housing should be reasonably airtight. The inlet should be big enough to accommodate the filter means. If the inlet is larger than the filter means then air would be allowed to pass without being exposed to the photocatalyst. If it is smaller than the filter means this would waste some of the available area of the filter. The size of the filter means should be big enough to permit suitable air flow. The air inlet may have an additional filter means, upstream of the photocatalyst filter means, such as is used in furnaces, to remove dust and prevent clogging of the photocatalyst. Since air cannot flow as fast through the filter means as through an unobstructed outlet of the same dimensions, the outlet may be made smaller than the inlet to equalize the system. In an apparatus tested, a 33% size difference was used (0.31 m 2 (48 in. 2 ) inlet and 0.23 m 2 (36 in. 2 ) outlet). A protective grille is preferably placed on the outside of the inlet and the outlet. The grille should not substantially interfere with the air flow. The light source should supply light at sufficient intensity and wavelength band to energize the photocatalyst so that reaction or breakdown of the contaminants is effected. A wide range of light sources can be used. Suitable light sources include: fluorescent blacklights, incandescent blacklights, xenon lamps and low, medium and high pressure mercury lamps. However, if the photocatalyst is titanium dioxide, a source of UV, such as a blacklight having a wavelength band of from 300 to 440 nm, is preferred. Whilst shorter wavelengths such as around 254 nm have been found to be efficient, it is preferred, for safety reasons, to use light in the UV A region. A wavelength band of around 350-380 nm is suitable. A wavelength of 366 nm is preferred. The intensity of light is governed by the type and number of light sources. For titanium dioxide it has been found that lower power 15 watt mercury bulbs, with a peak output at wavelengths of 313 and 366 nm, are adequate. Such bulbs provide safety and economy. Using such bulbs, it has been found that whilst there is a significant increase in reaction speed (measured by the reduction in contaminants as a function of time) using 2 bulbs rather than 1 bulb, the increase obtained by using 3, rather than 2 bulbs, is less significant. Therefore for domestic applications, 2 bulbs may be preferred for the sake of economy. The light source is arranged on one side of the filter means. That is, the light source is not surrounded by the filter means. This permits the filter means to have a larger area in the path of the air and the light from the light source radiates to reach the exposed area of the filter means. Preferably a reflecting layer is disposed behind the light source to reflect escaping light back to the filter means. Any photocatalyst which effectively reduces or removes contaminants may be used. Suitable photocatalysts are TiO 2 , ZnO, CdS, WO 3 , SnO 2 , ZrO 2 , Sb 2 O 4 , CeO 2 and Fe 2 O 3 . A preferred photocatalyst is the anatase form of TiO 2 . Optimizing odor or contaminant removal will be a balance between conflicting needs such as increasing efficiency on the one hand and increasing air flow and reducing costs on the other hand. For a given photocatalyst, efficiency of contaminant removal will be affected by: the intensity and wavelength of the light; the surface area of the photocatalyst; the volumetric air flow; and the pressure differential across the filter means. The air flow determines the residence time or the time the contaminants are in contact with the photocatalyst. With regard to residence time, the longer the contaminated air is in contact with the photocatalyst, the higher the probability that the contaminants will decompose. On the other hand, it is desirable to process as much air as quickly as possible to reduce the level of contaminants. The circulation means is conveniently a fan although other means, such as pumps, or convection might be used. It is only required that the means ensures movement of the air over the photocatalyst. In a preferred embodiment the inlet is in the top of one side the front of the housing and the outlet is at the end of a tunnel protruding out from the bottom of the same side of the housing. This tunnel gives a convenient location for the fan and, by increasing the area of the bottom of the apparatus (the "footprint"), gives stability to the apparatus so that it will not readily tip over. Such a design also permits a further preferred feature in which the filter can extend substantially the whole height of the apparatus. Incoming air is then exposed to the top section of the filter, guided around in a U-turn by the curved configuration of the back of the housing and is then again exposed to photocatalysis on the bottom section of the filter on its way through the tunnel to the outlet. A plenum is used to separate top and bottom sections of the filter in this arrangement. Other arrangements are, of course, possible. For example, the housing could be constructed so that the circulating air travels in an essentially straight path from an inlet on one side of the housing to an outlet at the other side of the housing. In such an arrangement the housing might conveniently be rectangular in shape. The filter means could be mounted adjacent either the inlet or the outlet or even two filter means could be used one located adjacent each of the inlet and outlet. The circulating means could then be located centrally between the inlet and outlet. Thus it will be seen that various arrangements are possible. The filter means includes a filter which may be flat or pleated. The filter essentially comprises two components, the support and the photocatalyst. The support is fibrous and should be sufficiently porous to permit adequate air flow. Preferably the support has a large surface area and is transparent to the light used or absorbs little of the light. The photocatalyst should be arranged on the support to maximize the surface area exposed to the circulating air. The photocatalyst could be in the form of a coating on the support prepared conventionally by contacting the support with a coating composition of the photocatalyst in a liquid medium. An effective way to maximize the surface area is to apply the photocatalyst in the form of a finely divided powder to a fibrous non- woven support which is capable of holding the photocatalyst particles electrostatically, such as an electret material. Precharged electret fibers are preferably formed from a film of a dielectric polymer that is capable of being corona charged and then fibrillated. Suitable film forming dielectric polymers include polyolefins, such as polypropylene, linear low density polyethylene, poly-1-butene, polytetrafluoroethylene, polytrifluorochloroethylene; or polyvinylchloride; aromatic polyarenes, such as polystyrene; polycarbonates; polyesters; and copolymers and blends thereof. Preferred are polyolefins free of branched alkyl radicals and copolymers thereof. Particularly preferred are polypropylene and polypropylene copolymers. Various functional additives known in the art can be blended with the dielectric polymers or copolymers such as poly(4-methyl-l-pentene) as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,874,399, a fatty acid metal salt, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,789,504, or particulates as per U.S. Pat. No. 4,456,648. Such electret fibers will electrostatically fix particulates. Blown fibers, particularly blown polypropylene microfibers are preferred as the support material. It is further preferred that the fibrous support is polypropylene having a weight range of from 20 to 80 gm/m 2 , more preferably in the range of from 30 to 60 gm/m 2 . The preferred support material, blown polypropylene microfibers, is available commercially in rolls having a thickness of 0.127 mm (5 thousandths of an inch) in compressed form and 0.508 mm (20 thousandths of an inch) in uncompressed form. For the present invention it is preferred to "fluff' the material giving an uncompressed thickness of 1.524 mm (60 thousandths of an inch). This material, after having been loaded with the photocatalyst, is preferably used as a double or triple layer. A filter means in which the photocatalyst is electrostatically fixed to the support, is readily prepared by contacting the finely divided photocatalyst powder with the support and removing any loosely adhered particles, or excess particles, by vacuuming. A photocatalyst in powder form can also be loaded on the support by coating the support with, for example, a thin water-based acrylic adhesive and then contacting the coated support with the photocatalyst powder. Titanium dioxide can be loaded on a polypropylene support using this technique. The photocatalyst powder should generally have a particle size of less than 1 mm or the support may not be able to hold the particles electrostatically. Further, a smaller particle size would normally provide a larger surface area and hence increase the reaction speed. Particle sizes ranging from 1 nm to 1 mm (1000 microns) are suitable, preferably from 2 nm to 1000 nm. The filter should generally provide a surface area of photocatalyst of at least 1 m 2 /g, preferably at least 5 m 2 /g. When the photocatalyst is in powder form and is electrostatically fixed to the support, substantially all the surface area of the photocatalyst is available for reaction. Suitable titanium dioxide photocatalysts in powder form are available from Degussa under the trade designation "P 25", which has a surface area of about 50 m 2 /g, and from Hombikat under the trade designation UV100, which has a surface area of about 250 m 2 /g. However, it is to be noted that when the particles are extremely fine they may clump together resulting in a decrease of the predicted surface area. A filter means prepared by coating a composition of a titanium dioxide photocatalyst in a liquid medium onto a support would typically have a surface area of from about 10 to about 15 m 2 /g. Using an electrostatically bound powdered photocatalyst on a fibrous support, up to 50% by weight of photocatalyst can be loaded on the support based on the weight of the support. A preferred loading range is from 10 to 25% by weight. By use of an activated photocatalyst, such as titanium dioxide, both organic and inorganic compounds can be decomposed. For example: hydrocarbons can be decomposed to carbon dioxide and water; and hydrogen sulfide can be decomposed to elemental sulfur. The reactions which occur do not consume the photocatalyst which may be continually re-activated by the light. The filter means may additionally comprise a layer of an adsorbent, such as activated carbon, on at least one other fibrous porous support layers to benefit from the combination of both photocatalytic and adsorptive contaminant reduction or removal. If such an additional layer is used, it should be on the side of the photocatalyst layer opposite the light source to avoid blocking the light and obstructing activation of the photocatalyst. Since the filter means is disposed across the path of the circulating air, when the apparatus is in operation, a back pressure is generated. The back pressure is a function of the pressure drop across the filter. To give an example, in a domestic furnace, the pressure drop across a filter would be around 3.81 mm (0.15 inches) of water at a face velocity of 1.524 m/s (300 ft/min). In such a domestic furnace, if the pressure drop across the filter rose to 12.7 mm (0.5 inches) of water at 1.524 m/s (300 ft/min), the fan might not have enough power to circulate air. For table top or bench top applications, such as preferred for an apparatus of the present invention, the pressure-drop across the filter should preferably be in the range of 7.62 mm to 12.7 mm (0.3 to 0.5 inches) of water at a face velocity of 0.381 m/s (75 ft/min), 15.24 mm to 25.4 mm (0.6 to 1.0 inches) at 1.524 m/s (300 ft/min). Ideally, the pressure drop should be as low as possible for a given air flow, consistent with achieving effective contact of the air with the photocatalyst. Preferably, the air flow will range from a face velocity of from 0.0508 m/s to 3.556 m/s (10 ft/min to 700 ft/min), more preferably from 0.127 m/s to 1.778 m/s (25 ft/min to 350 ft/min). Using the preferred polypropylene support material a thickness of from 3.048 mm (120 thousandths of an inch), for a double layer, to about 3.302 mm (130 thousandths of an inch) for a compressed triple or multiple layer, is suitable. It is preferred that the support is pleated or corrugated. This pleated construction permits a greater surface area without significantly increasing the back pressure or impeding the air flow. To assist in constructing such a pleated structure the support can be mounted on a backing material which can be configured to hold the desired shape. The backing material should not interfere with air flow or the energization of the photocatalyst. Expanded metal or scrim is suitable as a backing material. Scrim is a net of material such as polypropylene and is available for example, from the Conwed Corp. A form of scrim commercially available has a thickness of about 0.254 mm (10 thousandths of an inch). The backing layer may be coated with a layer of pressure-sensitive adhesive to hold the support. The filter means may have multiple layers of the support, for example a layer of support on each of a plurality of backings, or a single backing might have a layer of support on each side so the backing layer is actually in between the support layers. Of course, having more layers will impede air flow. A single or double-layer, pleated, is preferred. The apparatus can be used to remove various odors and contaminants, for example, low molecular weight organic gases such as isobutane, propane, diethylether and acetaldehyde and higher molecular weight gases such as ethylpropionate (fruity rum smell), allylbutyrate (peach, apricot smell) and propylbutyrate (sweaty, rancid smell). An important contaminant which can be removed is hydrogen sulfide. It has been said that 80 percent of malodorous gases contain hydrogen sulfide. With reference to Figure 1, an apparatus for purifying air according to the invention includes a housing 1 which is generally L-shaped with a curved back. The housing is made of structural plastic material but could be made of any other suitable structural material such as metal. The front of the housing has a top portion comprising an air inlet 2 and bottom portion having an extension generally indicated by 3 terminating in an air outlet 4. A fan 5 is mounted in the extension 3. The extension 3 provides a convenient location for fan 5 and additionally provides a stable design. A filter means in the form of a generally planar filter cartridge 6 is mounted within the housing adjacent inlet 2 and extends from the top of the housing to the bottom of the housing generally coplanar with inlet 2. It can be seen that the filter cartridge 6 extends across both the upstream and downstream air flow passages such that the cross-sectional area of the cartridge is substantially equal to the sum of the areas of the upstream and downstream passages. Disposed in cartridge 6 is a filter 7 which comprises one or more layers of a support having a photocatalyst fixed thereon. A plenum 8 separates the filter cartridge 6 into an upper filter section and a lower filter section so that circulating air, shown by arrows 9, 10, 11 and 12, passes through the upper section of the cartridge 6 after entering inlet 2 and then passes through the lower section on its way to the outlet 4. In this embodiment the air is thus exposed twice to the filter. The preferred configuration of filter 7 shown in Figure 1 is a pleated arrangement in which filter 7 comprises a plurality of planar faces each disposed at an angle to the general direction of the air flow. The filter will be discussed in more detail hereinafter. UV lamps 13 act as the light source and are mounted in the side walls of housing 1 on one side of filter cartridge 6 and between filter cartridge 6 and the back of the housing. UV lamps are a preferred light source for titanium dioxide as photocatalyst. The lamps shown are conventional cylindrical UV lamps and extend from one side wall of the housing to the other side wall. The positioning of lamps 13 is not critical, provided they can energize the photocatalyst effectively. The lamps are activated by a switch 14 mounted at the top of housing 1 for easy access, and a ballast 15, mounted at the bottom of the housing for stability. The back of housing 1 comprises a shroud 16 which is pivoted at pivots 17 at the top of the housing and can be opened upwardly for easy access to the inside of the housing. A lock 18 and catch 19 fasten the pivoted shroud 16 in its closed position. A reflective surface 20 of polished aluminum on the inside surface of shroud 16 and the back of housing 1, redirects light escaping from the lamps 13 to the filter 7 to maximize efficiency. Polished aluminum is the preferred material for reflection of UV light. Figure 2 shows a front view of the apparatus of Figure 1. Housing 1 is provided with a protective inlet grille 30, disposed across the inlet 2 (not shown in this Figure), and protective outlet grill 31, disposed across the outlet 4 (not shown in this Figure). Figure 3 is another side view of the apparatus shown in Figures 1 and 2 and is the same as Figure 1 except that it shows the pivoted shroud 16 in an open position. In operation, fan 5 draws outside air through inlet 2 and through the upper portion of filter 7. The photocatalyst on filter 7 is energized by the UV lamps 13 which causes breakdown and degradation of contaminants in the air in contact with it. The air continues to be drawn through housing 1 around the back and through the lower section of filter 7 where further breakdown and degradation are effected in the lower section of the filter. Reaction products and unreacted gases and air then pass through extension 3 and are expelled from outlet 4. Figures 4, 5 and 6 show the filter cartridge 6 of Figure 1 in more detail. Cartridge 6 has an outside casing of two detachable sections 40 and 41 which contain the filter 7. The casing permits easy handling and protection of filter 7. In the embodiment shown in the drawings, filter 7 has a pleated or corrugated shape. Plenum 8 divides the upper (inlet) section from the lower (outlet) section of the filter and prevents air from being permitted to bypass the filter. Narrow lips 42 and 43 extend across the front and back faces of the casing sections to comfortably retain the filter in the casing. Figures 7, 8 and 9 are exploded views of three types of filter suitable for use in the present invention. Figure 7 is a view of the filter 7 shown in Figures 4, 5 and 6. Support 71 is a double layer of blown polypropylene microfibers loaded with a photocatalyst powder of titanium dioxide electrostatically fixed to the fibers. Backing layers 72 and 73 are expanded metal mesh which have been formed into a pleated or corrugated shape. To achieve the filter 7 (shown in Figure 1) the support layer 71 is pressed between expanded metal mesh layers 72 and 73 forcing the pliable fibrous support layer 71 to adopt the same pleated shape as expanded metal mesh layers 72 and 73. In Figure 8, support 81 is a single layer of the same titanium dioxide loaded polypropylene fibers as shown in Figure 7. Since only a single backing layer 82 is used, support 81 is fixed to the backing layer 82 by applying a coating of pressure- sensitive adhesive to either the backing layer 82 or the support layer 81. Figure 9 is the same as Figure 7 except that support 91 is a single layer (as in Figure 8) between the two backing layers 92 and 93. A further difference is that an additional support layer 94 is present. The additional support layer may be an additional layer of polypropylene fibers loaded with titanium dioxide photocatalyst or it may be a porous layer containing a conventional adsorbent such as a layer of active carbon fixed to a porous web of polyester fibers. An apparatus according to the invention was constructed by modifying an LP 1500 Bionaire air purifier. The UV lamps were 15 watt, 0.3048 m (twelve inch) RPR-3000 lamps (such as used in a Rayonet Photochemical Reactor) obtained from the Southern Ultraviolet Co. The fan had two speeds. The high speed or high flow setting provided a flow rate of 1080 L/min. The low speed setting provided a flow rate of 604 L/min. In the apparatus used these settings correspond to face velocities of 0.9144 m/s (180 ft/min) (high flow) and 0.508 m/s (100 ft/min) (low flow). The modified Bionaire LP 1500 air purifier which was used in the examples, and represented schematically by Figures 1, 2 and 3, had a height of 0.222 m (8.75 inches), a depth of 0.27 m (10.625 inches) and a width of 0.31 m (12.25 inches). These dimensions give a compact device with a modest "footprint" suitable for a bench or desk top. The filter cartridge used had a width of 0.2921 m (11.5 inches) and a height of 0.197 m (7.75 inches). The plenum was 0.086 m (3.38 inches) from the bottom of the cartridge. The cartridge was 0.0381 m (1.5 inches) thick and the distance from one pleat to the next, along the plane of the pleat was 0.04 m (1.58 inches). Thus a filter with eight pleats had 16 pleat faces making it comparable to a flat unpleated filter spanning 0.4064 m x 0.04 m (16 x l.58 inches). The lip of the cartridge was about 0.0127 m (0.5 inches) all round. EXAMPLES Examples representing the present invention, a comparative example, and a reference (Philips) were tested as follows: The apparatus was placed in an air-tight chamber 0.609 m by 0.609 m by 0.609 m (2 feet by 2 feet by 2 feet) (227 liters) except if indicated otherwise. A known amount of contaminant was introduced into the chamber. For testing purposes, the initial concentration of contaminant was sometimes adjusted to as much as 1500 to 2000 ppm. (In normal use, concentrations would be about 1-20 ppm). After a few minutes to allow for equilibration, the apparatus was activated and samples removed with a syringe at regular intervals. The samples were analyzed with a Perkin Elmer Autosystem Gas chromatogram - 9000 equipped with a methanizer. The temperature of the flame ionization detector was reduced from 350°C to 225°C when testing for isobutane and propane, to improve accuracy. For hydrogen sulfide, the concentration was measured with a confined space monitor available from 3M under the trade designation "Dynatel CSM 500". The apparatus was compared to a Philips Clean Air System 75 (as a reference) which is considered to be an industry standard. The Philips device is designed to remove odors and has two activated carbon filters. It has a flow rate of 3136 L/min. Air is drawn in from the sides of the device and exhausted from the top of the device. The apparatus was tested using the following compounds as contaminants: isobutane, hydrogen sulfide, propane, diethyl ether, acetaldehyde, ethyl propionate, allyl butyrate and propyl butyrate. The contaminant used is indicated in each of Tables 1 to 15B below. The filter tested and flow rate used for the apparatus/filter combinations is indicated in each of Tables 1 to 15B. The apparatus tested had 3 UV bulbs with a wavelength of 313 nm each, unless otherwise indicated. Notably, the number of bulbs (with the same wavelength) was varied in Example 6 and the wavelength (with the same number of bulbs) was varied in Table 7. The absence of a contaminant concentration reading in the tables below indicates that such a reading was not taken for the time period designated in the column of the table. Preparation of Filters Filter #1 A web of blown polypropylene non- woven fibers was needle-tacked into a web. The web was shaken in a bag with excess titanium dioxide powder (available from Degussa under the trade designation "P 25") until the web was saturated with the powder. The titanium dioxide loaded web was vacuumed in a fume hood or with a portable vacuum to remove loose powder. The web was folded and placed on a pleated wire mesh backing layer (0.381 mm (0.015 inches) thick and 31.75 mm (1.25 inches) diamond expanded metal mesh) having eight pleats or corrugations. A second pleated wire mesh backing layer was pressed onto the other side of the web. The filter was placed in a cardboard frame (0.3098 m (12 inches) by 0.2032 m (8 inches)) for ease of handling. Filter #2 The procedure for Filter #1 was followed except that only one layer of polypropylene web was used and the web had a pleated wire mesh backing on only one side. The web was fixed to the backing by a coating of pressure-sensitive adhesive. Filter #3 A sheet of glass fiber was used instead of the blown polypropylene fibers. The titanium dioxide was coated on the glass fibers with a sol gel process (such as is used in US Patent No. 4,892,712). Otherwise the procedure was as for Filter #1. Filter #4 and Filter #5 The procedure for Filter #1 was followed except that a scrim material was used as backing layer. The scrim was coated with a pressure-sensitive adhesive. Since the scrim is difficult to pleat, this type of filter was unpleated and flat. Filter #6 The procedure for Filter #1 was followed except that one layer of titanium dioxide loaded web was replaced by a layer of a polyester fiber web coated with an activated carbon adsorbent. This hybrid filter has both a photocatalyst layer and an additional layer of activated carbon on a polyester fiber support. EXAMPLE 1 TABLE 1 Contaminant (Isobutane) Concentration (ppm) Apparatus Filter Combination Time Reference 1 Example A Example B (Hours) (Philips) Filter #1 Filter #1 High Flow Low Flow (1080 L min) (604 L/min) 0.00 1473 1361 1406 0.50 1364 1321 1355 1.00 1355 1291 1311 1.50 1347 1259 1264 2.00 1330 1229 1221 2.50 1323 1205 1186 3.00 1172 3.25 1299 3.50 1141 1149 3.75 1291 4.00 1126 1123 4.25 1276 4.50 1110 4.75 1265 5.00 1088 812 5.25 1258 5.75 1242 6.00 1045 6.75 1208 6.83 859 7.00 1004 7.50 982 7.75 1192 22.50 300 22.75 474 23.25 923 EXAMPLE 2 TABLE 2 EXAMPLE 3 TABLE 3 1 Contaminant (Diethylether) Concentration (ppm) Apparatus/Filter Combination Time Reference 3 Example D Example E (Hours) (Philips) Filter #1 Filter #1 High Flow Low Flow (1080 L/min) (604 L/min) 0.00 1909 1665 1524 0.50 1870 1392 1306 1.00 1880 1147 1106 1.50 1867 986 952 2.00 1858 864 810 2.50 1826 741 719 3.00 1814 654 636 3.50 1763 568 552 EXAMPLE 4 TABLE 4 EXAMPLE 5 TABLE 5 Contaminant (Isobutane) Concentration (ppm) Apparatus/Filter Combinations Time Reference 5 Example G Example H Example I (Hours) (Philips) Filter #3 Filter #1 Filter #2 Low Flow Low Flow Low Flow (604 L min) (604 L/min) (604 L min) 0.00 1473 1380 1406 1384 0.50 1364 1352 1355 1356 1.00 1355 1314 1311 1335 1.50 1347 1301 1264 1316 2.00 1330 1262 1221 1295 2.50 1323 1265 1186 1256 3.00 1173 3.17 1232 3.25 1299 3.50 1234 1149 1202 3.75 1291 4.00 1224 1123 4.25 1276 4.50 1208 1150 4.75 1265 5.25 1258 5.50 1177 1113 5.75 1242 6.00 912 6.50 1141 1083 6.75 1208 6.83 860 7.00 1126 1076 7.75 1192 22.50 301 23.00 618 572 23.25 923 EXAMPLE 6 TABLE 6 Contaminant (Isobutane) Concentration (ppm) Apparatus Filter Combinaϋon Time (Hours) Example J Example K Example L 3UV Bulbs 2 UV Bulbs l UV Bulb Filter #1 Filter #1 Filter #1 Low Flow Low Flow Low Flow (604 L/min) (604 L/min) (604 L/min) 0.00 1448 1303 1262 0.50 1370 1215 1232 1.00 1371 1218 1.50 1201 2.00 1257 1198 3.00 1110 1221 3.50 1235 4.00 1215 1070 4.08 1144 5.00 1158 1033 5.17 1122 5.83 1093 6.00 1117 22.00 573 576 770 EXAMPLE7 TABLE7 Contaminant (Isobutane) Concentration (ppm) Apparatus/Filter Combinaϋon Time (Hours) Example M Example N 313 nm 366 nm Filter #1 Filter #1 Low Flow Low Flow (604 L/min) (604 L min) 0.00 1360 1292 0.50 1311 1263 1.00 1268 1229 1.50 1223 1205 2.00 1181 1169 2.50 1147 1137 3.00 1134 1092 3.50 1112 1083 4.00 1067 1070 4.50 1039 5.00 1029 5.50 990 6.00 882 982 6.50 954 6.83 832 7.00 936 22.50 291 23.00 414 EXAMPLE8 TABLE8 EXAMPLE 9 TABLE 9 EXAMPLE 10 TABLE 10 EXAMPLE 11 TABLE 11 Contaminant (Isobutane) Concentraϋon (ppm) Apparatus/Filter Combinaϋon Example R Example S Time (Hours) Filter #4 FUter #5 Low Flow High Flow (604 L/min) (1080 L/min) 0.00 1448 1473 0.25 1450 0.50 1402 1431 0.83 1404 1.00 1362 1.33 1356 1.50 1327 1.83 1330 2.00 1289 2.50 1256 2.67 1294 3.00 1247 3.50 1186 1216 4.00 1180 4.50 1158 4.67 1124 5.00 1120 5.50 1077 6.00 1067 6.50 1030 7.00 1009 7.17 1003 22.83 476 23.00 502 EXAMPLE 12 TABLE 12 EXAMPLE 13 TABLE 13 Contaminant (Hydrogen Sulfide) Concentraϋon (ppm) Apparatus/Filter Combinaϋon Example U Example V Comp. Example A Time Filter #1 Filter #1 Filter #1 (Hours) Low Flow High Flow High Flow (604 L/min) (1080 L/min) (1080 L/min) UV On UV On UV Off 0.00 40 41 42 0.25 29 33 42 0.50 25 23 42 0.75 20 14 41 1.00 15 08 41 1.25 12 04 39 1.50 08 02 39 1.75 05 39 2.00 38 NOTE: In Examples 12 and 13 the testing chamber was a larger chamber of 510 liters capacity. Also, the hydrogen sulfide concentration was determined with a confined space monitor available from Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company under the trade designation "Dynatel CSM-500" which has an electro-chemical sensor for hydrogen sulfide. EXAMPLE 14 Table 14A Table 14B EXAMPLE 15 Table 15A Table 15B The clean air delivery rate (CADR) is a convenient parameter to compare contaminant removal rates. If In (C AI /C A ) is plotted against time, where CAI is the contaminant concentration at a given time and C A is the initial concentration, then the slope of the graph will be the decay constant k. The natural decay constant kn is the slope of the same graph for results obtained without photocatalysis or other active removal. The CADR is then calculated as: CADR = (k-k n )V where V is the volume of the test chamber. Using the above examples, Tables A to E can be generated. The table from which the decay constant k was calculated is indicated below as the "Resource Table" and the example or reference is indicated as "Example Designation". TABLE A Decay constants (k) and clean air delivery rates (CADR) for different filters tested with isobutane (initial concentration approximately 1400 parts per million). Resource Example Filter Flow Rate k (l/hr) CADR Table Designaϋon (L/min) 5 Ex. G Filter #3 604 0.03404 6.71 1 Ex. B Filter #1 604 0.06894 14.64 1 Ex. A Filter #1 1080 0.04572 9.37 5 Ex. I Filter #2 604 0.0382 7.68 11 Ex. R Filter #4 604 0.04565 9.35 11 Ex. S Filter #5 1080 0.04948 10.22 14B Ex. X Filter #6 1080 0.028096 5.36 15B Ex. Z Filter #6 1080 0.031244 6.078 1 Reference 1 Reference (Philips) 3115 0.01812 3.10 TABLE B Decay constants (k) and clean air delivery rates (CADR) for Filter #1 tested with initial concentrations of isobutane at approximately 1400 ppm. Note: The decay constant (k n ) for isobutane was determined to be 0.00446 L/hr. TABLE C Decay constants (k) and clean air delivery rates (CADR) for low molecular weight gases (initial concentrations of approximately 1500 ppm). Resource Example Gas Tested Filter Flow Rate k (l/hr) CADR Table Designaϋon (L/min) (L hr) 2 Ex. C Propane Filter #1 1080 0.0343 7.788 2 Reference 2 Propane Reference (Philips) 3115 0.0155 3.515 3 Ex. E Diethvlether Filter #1 604 0.2895 65.72 3 Ex. D Diethvlether Filter #1 1080 0.3036 68.91 3 Reference 3 Diethylether Reference (Philips) 3115 0.01905 4.324 4 Ex. F Acetaldehyde Filter #1 1080 0.1974 44.8 4 Reference 4 Acetaldehyde Reference (Philips) 3115 0.01967 4.466 Note: The natural decay constant (k„) was not obtained for these gases and was taken to be zero. As a result, the actual clean air delivery rates would be slightly lower than the reported values. TABLE D Decay constants (k) and clean air delivery rates (CADR) for higher molecular weight gases (initial concentrations of approximately 100-500 ppm). Resource Example Gas Tested Filter Flow Rate k (l/min) CADR Table Designaϋon (L/min) (L/min) 8 Ex. O Ethyl Propionate Filter #1 604 0.051817 11.76 (fruity rum smell) 8 Reference 6 Ethyl Propionate Reference (Philips) 3115 0.019917 4.52 (fruity rum smell) 9 Ex. P Allyl Butyrate Filter #1 604 0.04633 10.52 (apricot smell) 9 Reference 7 Allyl Butyrate Reference (Philips) 3115 0.032433 7.362 (apricot smell) 10 Ex. Q Propyl Butyrate Filter #1 604 0.03715 11.08 (sweaty smell) 10 Reference 8 Propyl Butyrate Reference (Philips) 3115 0.0529 12.01 (sweaty smell) Note: The natural decay constant (k„) was not obtained for these gases and was taken to be zero. As a result, the actual clean air delivery rates would be slightly lower than the reported values. 0 TABLE E Decay constants (k) and clean air delivery rates (CADR) for hydrogen sulfide (initial concentrations of approximately 40 ppm). Resource Example Filter Flow Rate k (l/min) CADR Table Designaϋon (L/min) (L/min) 13 Ex. U Filter #1 604 0.01868 9.242 13 Ex. V Filter #1 1080 0.03428 17.2 13 Comp. Ex. A Filter #1 (UV Off) 0.000919 0.1857 14A Ex. W Filter #6 1080 3.305522 28.10 15A Ex. Y Filter #6 1080 1.09159 9.28 12 Reference 9 Reference (Philips) 3115 0.002603 1.045 5 Note: The natural decay constant (k n ) for hydrogen sulfide was determined to be 0.000555 L/min. TABLE F Filter #4 was tested using hydrogen sulfide as the contaminant with intial concentrations of 40 ppm at both low and high flow. A resource table is not shown for this test, but the calculations for decay constants (k) and clean air delivery rates (CADR) for hydrogen sulfide (initial concentrations of approximately 40 ppm) are shown below. | Filter Flow Rate (L min) k (l/min) CADR (L/min) I FUter #4 604 0.0202 10.02 U Filter #4 1080 0.03118 15.62 It should be noted that for carbon filters the CADR drops (less efficiency) when the flow rate is decreased. For a photocatalytic device of the invention, decreasing the flow rate generally increases the CADR. The results demonstrate that the apparatus of the invention outperforms the active carbon filter of the Philips device, especially for the removal of low molecular weight gases such as isobutane, propane, acetaldehyde and hydrogen sulfide.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. An apparatus for purifying air comprising a housing having an air inlet and an air outlet; a circulating means, mounted in the housing, to circulate air from outside the housing through the inlet along an air flow path inside the housing and out of the outlet; a planar filter means disposed across the path of circulating air, said filter means comprising a photocatalyst fixed to a fibrous porous support; and a light source mounted in the housing to direct light onto the filter means to activate the photocatalyst. 2. An apparatus according to claim 1 wherein the air flow path has an upstream portion in which air flows in one direction and an adjacent downstream portion in which air flows in the opposite direction and the planar filter means is disposed in the housing such that the filter means extends across the upstream and downstream portions. 3. An apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said air-flow path is straight. 4. An apparatus according to claim 2 in which the sum of the cross- sectional areas of the upstream and downstream portions of the air flow path is substantially equal to the cross-sectional area of the filter means. 5. An apparatus according to claim 1, 2, 3 or 4 wherein the photocatalyst is fixed electrostatically to the support. 6. An apparatus according to claim 1, 2, 3 or 4 wherein the photocatalyst is powdered titanium dioxide, the source of light is a source of UV light having a peak intensity in the UV B range and the support is blown polypropylene electret fibers. 7. An apparatus according to claim 1, 2, 3 or 4 wherein the support has a structural porous backing of expanded metal mesh and the support has a pleated configuration. 8. An apparatus according to claim 1 , 2, 3 or 4 wherein the filter means further comprises a second fibrous porous support comprising an adsorbent. 9. An apparatus according to claim 8 wherein the adsorbent is activated carbon.

Inventors: DISANAYAKA BIMSARA, DIVIGALPITIYA RANJITH, LIVINGSTONE DAVID E, DISANAYAKA, BIMSARA, DIVIGALPITIYA, RANJITH, LIVINGSTONE, DAVID, E.
Applicants: MINNESOTA MINING & MFG, MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Application year: 1996
Main classification: B01D53
IPC codes: A61L9, B01D53