Optical add-drop multiplexer for optical communication networks

Abstract: The device (10) comprises a pair of nominally identical interference filters (11, 12), one of which carries out the function of extracting a carrier from a wavelength division multiplexed stream and the other the insertion function. The filters (11, 12) are arranged in parallel planes and are secured to opposite faces of a transparent plate (13), in such a way that the stream exits the device (10) after having undergone reflection by both filters. The plate (13) is mounted on a support (14) which can be rotated in either direction to vary the tuning wavelength of the filters.

Description: The invention described herein relates to optical communication networks and in particular it concerns an optical add-drop multiplexer, i. e. a device for the extraction of a carrier, modulated by a certain information signal, from a stream of optical signals comprising multiple carriers, and for the insertion into the stream of another carrier, modulated by a different information signal. Add-drop multiplexers are used, for instance, in nodes of a wavelength division multiplexing communication network, to extract from the multiplexed stream a channel containing the information directed to a user or to users connected to the node, letting the remaining channels pass through unaltered, and to add to the multiplexed stream a new channel which transports the information generated within the node. In practice, to simplify network management, it is suitable that the dropped channel and the added channel are allocated the same wavelength position, which is therefore unambiguously associated with the node itself. Another possible application of such devices is in routing nodes of reconfigurable optical networks, to re-route certain information streams as a result of changed traffic conditions or to remedy a failure downstream of the node. Add-drop multiplexers can be considered four-port devices, with two ports for the input/output of the overall stream and two ports for the input/output of the individual carrier. Hereinafter the ports related to the overall stream shall be called input and respectively output port, and those related to the individual carrier shall be called "drop" and respectively "add" (or insertion) port. To manufacture add-drop multiplexers, the use of non-absorbing interference filters has been proposed. These filters, as is well known, comprise a succession of dielectric layers having such refraction indices and thicknesses that the filters transmit a certain portion of the spectrum of the incident radiation and reflect the remaining portion. A simple inclined interference filter, placed in a suitable system for collimating and refocussing the optical beams, in principle could directly perform the functions required of the device: the filter receives on one face the multiplexed stream and reflects all wavelengths except the one to be extracted, which exits from the opposite face; this face receives the wavelength to be re-inserted, which in turn is transmitted through the filter and is combined with the multiplexed stream. However, a device using a single filter presents a poor extinction ratio in reflection: i.e. a non-negligible fraction of the power associated with the extracted channel is transferred to the output port, thus creating interference phenomena between this signal and the one at the same wavelength that is present at the add port, and these phenomena lead to severe degradation in the performance of the system. Moreover filter tuning would be hard to achieve, since the variation of the filter inclination required to vary the transmitted band also causes the angular displacement of the reflected beam with respect to an optical collecting system. The paper "Multilayer add-drop multiplexers in a self healing WDM ring network", presented by A. Hamel et al. at the OFC '95 Conference, San Diego (USA), 26 February - 3 March 1995, paper TuQ2, describes a device utilising two interference filters, one to drop and the other to add a channel. This device has a good extinction ratio, according to the data reported in the paper. However, the actual structure of the device is not described, nor is mentioned the possibility of filter tuning. Parallelogram prisms carrying filters at their parallel faces are known to be used in usual multiplexers/demultiplexers, see US 5 005 935 A. The filters allow to add several inputs having different wavelengths to a single multiplex, and to demultiplex the multiplexed stream. The known structure however can not be used as an add-drop multiplexer. The object of the present invention is to provide an add-drop multiplexer which has a good extinction ratio in reflection and is tunable. The add-drop multiplexer according to the invention comprises a pair of nominally identical interference filters, one of which carries out the drop function and the other the add function. The two filters are secured to opposite faces of a transparent body and are arranged in parallel planes on said body in such a way that said stream exits the body after having undergone reflection by both filters, and said transparent body is mounted on a support which is hinged on an axis passing through the barycentre of the body, the axis being parallel to the planes of the filters. Means arranged to act on the support are provided in a manner to cause the rotation of the transparent body in either direction around the axis to vary the tuning wavelength of the filters. A more sophisticated embodiment, preferable with reference to a minor sensitivity to polarisation, is characterized in that said transparent body is comprised of a pair of elements and a half-wave plate interposed between the elements, each of the elements bearing a respective one of said filters, said elements being joined together by means of the half-wave plate which presents bi-refringence axes oriented at 45° with respect to the incidence plane of radiation incident on the device of the stream comprising the plurality of carriers, so that the plane of polarisation of the stream of signals reflected at the first filter is rotated by 90° when crossing the half-wave plate on its path between the two filters. EP-A 0 153 722 in the name of Oki Electric Industry Company, Limited, published on 4 September 1985, describes a device for multiplexing-demultiplexing multiple wavelengths (or for transmitting and receiving multiple wavelengths) which, in case of operation on two wavelengths, presents two parallel interference filters applied to two opposite faces of a transparent support. However, the filters are tuned on different wavelengths, so the device cannot be used to extract and re-insert a same carrier. The extraction of a carrier from a transiting stream and the re-insertion into the stream of the same carrier are also made impossible by the fact that the device incorporates the generators and detectors for all carriers to be multiplexed or demultiplexed. Finally, this device too is not tunable. For greater clarification, reference is made to the enclosed drawings, in which: Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the device according to the invention; and Figures 2 and 3 are top views of two embodiments of the device, As can be seen in Figure 1, the device comprises two nominally identical interference filters 11, 12, i.e. filters having the same spectral responses in reflection and transmission. The filters are parallel to each other and rigidly rotatable together around the overall barycentre of the device. The wavelength division multiplexed stream present on the input port (I) reaches a face of filter 11, which transmits towards the drop port (E) one of the channels (whose wavelength depends on the inclination of the filter); the other channels are reflected towards filter 12 from which they are reflected again thus passing to the output port (U). Filter 12 receives on the opposite face the channel to be re-inserted (add port A) which is transmitted and introduced into the multiplexed stream present on the output port. Owing to the way the ports are arranged, it can be noted that the stream passes to the output port after having undergone reflection by both filters. Filter 12 too, being nominally identical to filter 11, will transmit a substantial fraction of the residual power associated to the extracted channel: in this way the extinction ratio in reflection is doubled (in dB) with respect to a structure utilising a single filter which, as stated above, could carry out the functions of an add-drop multiplexer. Moreover, the rigid rotation of the two filters allows to tune their spectral responses, while maintaining the parallelism between the beams present on the drop and output ports; thus, such beams can still be easily focused onto respective fibres. Figure 2 is a more detailed depiction of a preferred embodiment of the device, indicated as a whole as 10. The elements described with reference to Figure 1 are indicated with the same references. Ports I, A, E, U are made of optical fibres terminating at the device. As it can be seen, filters 11, 12 are borne by a plate 13 of transparent material. Such an arrangement can be obtained by direct deposition of the dielectric layers or by gluing with adhesives having a suitable refraction index. The assembly constituted by plate 13 and filters 11, 12 is mounted on a support 14 hinged on a vertical axis 15 passing through the barycentre, and it can rotate in both directions, as indicated by arrow F. The rotation of support 14 can be commanded by a micrometer screw device 16 through a lever 17. The beams present at ports I, A are conveyed towards device 10 by respective graded index lenses 18, 19, and the beams leaving device 10 and directed to ports E, U are collected by respective graded index lenses 20, 21. Device 10 with the rotation control means and lenses 18-21 are mounted on a common support, which is not shown. The inclination angle of plate 13 with respect to the axes of lenses 18 - 21 in a position corresponding essentially to the central tuning value of the filter must take into account two contrasting requirements. On the one hand a pronounced inclination improves filter tuning and increases the spatial separation between the beams directed to ports E, U, as it is required to allow the beams to be coupled in the respective focusing lenses 20, 21 (whose diameters are typically of the order of 3 mm). On the other hand, the device is somewhat dependent on polarisation and the dependence increases as the angle of incidence of the beam increases: more particularly, in the case of the polarisation component perpendicular to the incidence plane, the reflected band is much narrower than in the case of the parallel component and, since the state of polarisation of the stream arriving at the device cannot be guaranteed a priori, this can represent a limitation to the performance of the device. It has been found that an inclination angle of about 25° represents a good compromise between the various requirements. As regards the extent of rotation of device 10, and thus the amplitude of the filter tuning interval, it is necessary to consider the typical tolerances of graded index lenses with respect to parallel translations of an input beam. It has been seen that, with the mean inclination angle stated above, rotations of about ±3 degrees, corresponding to a tuning interval of over 10 nanometres, can be suitable. To reduce dependence on the polarisation of the signals of the incident stream, device 100 shown in Fig. 3 can be used. In Fig. 3, the elements identical to those shown in Fig. 2 are denoted by the same reference numerals. In this embodiment, interference filters 11, 12 are secured to opposite faces of a body 103 made of transparent material and comprising a pair of blocks 104, 105 each of which carries a respective filter 11, 12. The two blocks are joined together by means of a half-wave plate 106 which has bi-refringence axes at 45° with respect to the incidence plane of the radiation. The wavelength division stream present on input port I, which is randomly polarised, with a certain ratio between the components parallel and perpendicular to the incidence plane of the stream itself, arrives on a face of filter 11, which as before transmits towards extraction port E one of the channels (whose wavelength depends on the inclination angle of the filter) and reflects the other channels towards filter 12. In the path between the two filters 11 and 12, the reflected stream crosses plate 106 which rotates the polarisation plane of the stream by 90°, so that in the stream impinging on filter 12 the two polarisation components are mutually exchanged with respect to the stream impinging on filter 11. In this way, the different responses of the filters to the polarisations parallel and orthogonal to the incidence plane are compensated. Since the presence of half-wave plate 106 reduces the dependence of the device on polarisation, the stream can be sent onto the device with higher angles of incidence. In respect of the channel dropped through filter 11 and the one added through filter 12, it should be remembered that the diversity in the filter response to the two polarisation states is less noticeable in transmission; moreover, only one carrier is involved and therefore bandwidth problems are not critical. It is evident that what is described herein is given solely by way of non-limiting example and that variations and modifications are possible without departing from the scope of the attached claims.

Claims: Add-drop multiplexer for the extraction of at least one optical carrier, modulated by an information signal, from a stream of optical signals comprising a plurality of carriers with different wavelengths, and for the reinsertion into the stream of the same carrier modulated by a different information signal, the multiplexer comprising a pair of nominally identical interference filters (11, 12), one of which performs the extraction function and the other the insertion function, characterised in that the two filters (11, 12) are secured to opposite faces of a transparent body (13; 103) and are arranged in parallel planes on said body in such a way that said stream exits the body (13; 103) after having undergone reflection by both filters, and in that said transparent body (13; 103) is mounted on a support (14) which is hinged on an axis (15) passing through the barycentre of the body (13; 103), the axis being parallel to the planes of the filters, and means (16, 17) arranged to act on the support (14) are provided in a manner to cause the rotation of the transparent body in either direction around the axis to vary the tuning wavelength of the filters. Add-drop multiplexer according to claim 1, characterised in that said transparent body comprises a transparent plate (13) carrying both filters (11, 12). Add-drop multiplexer according to claim 1, characterised in that said transparent body (103) is comprised of a pair of elements (104, 105) and a half-wave plate (106) interposed between the elements, each of the elements bearing a respective one of said filters (11, 12), said elements being joined together by means of the half-wave plate which presents bi-refringence axes oriented at 45° with respect to the incidence plane of the radiation incident on the device (100) of the stream comprising the plurality of carriers, so that the plane of polarisation of the stream of signals reflected at the first filter is rotated by 90° when crossing the half-wave plate on its path between the two filters (11, 12).

Inventors: BENDELLI GIAMPAOLO, LANO ROBERTO, BENDELLI, GIAMPAOLO, LANO, ROBERTO
Applicants: AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC, AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (A DELAWARE CORPORATION)
Application year: 1996
Main classification: G02B6
IPC codes: H04J14, G02B26, G02B6