Metal rinsing process with controlled metal microcorrosion reduction

Abstract: Process for rinsing a metallized substrate subject to metal microcorrosion using an acidic aqueous rinsing solution characterized in that the rinsing solution comprises at least one strong inorganic acid in an amount enough to reduce the alkalinity of the rinse solution to a level low enough to reduce microcorrosion of the said metal layer while rinsing.

Description: Field of the invention This invention relates to a metal layer rinsing process for metallized substrates, particularly it relates to a rinsing process for rinsing metallized substrates subjected to photoresist stripping using organic strippers comprising an alkanolamine. Moreover, the invention relates to a new use of nitric acid in rinsing solutions and organic photoresist strippers, as well as to new rinsing solutions and strippers. Background of the invention Organic photoresist strippers are commonly used both for the removal of photoresist from metallized wafers as for the cleaning of the metal layers during the device manufacturing cycle. The most important requirement for such strippers therefore is a negligible metal microcorrosion property. Modern organic strippers, however, are composed of an alkanolamine and a polar organic solvent. When such strippers are rinsed from the wafer surface during processing, the amine group reacts with the water and hydroxide ions are generated. High alkalinity has a detrimental effect on the exposed metal layers, especially on aluminium and its alloys. Therefore, it is very important that the high alkalinity of the rinsing solution as occurring after solvent stripping is decreased as fast as possible. To solve this problem, it is common practice to dip the wafers in isopropylalcohol (IPA) or other organic solvents to remove the amine groups of the organic strippers before water contact. Alternatively, organic acidic compounds are added to the photoresist stripper solution as corrosion inhibitors (G.Schwartzkopf, et al (1993) Proceedings of the Symposium on Interconnects, Contact Metallization and Multi-level Metallization and Reliability for Semiconductor Devices , Interconnects and Thin Insulator Materials. ECS Proc.93-25, p. 379, Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ). For obvious environmental reasons, e.g. waste disposal problems, there is a wish to decrease the total consumption of organic chemicals. Moreover, by avoiding an organic solvent dip after stripping, there is no need for an intermediate bath and obvious cost savings on room space can be generated. Therefore, the use of inorganic acids to reduce the alkalinity of the post-stripping rinse solution has been proposed. US 5,336,371 and US 5,175,124 describe the use of carbonic acid, a weak inorganic acid, to acidify the rinsing water. This is achieved by bubbling CO 2 through the water-based rinsing solution. In this process monitoring the concentration of the carbonic acid is difficult. In particular, the pH of the carbonated rinse solution will depend upon the total amount of CO 2 that will dissolve in the water. This is influenced by temperature, exposure time to air etc., and therefore difficult to control. EP 596 515 discloses how metal corrosion is avoided by adding weak acids to alkaline containing strippers. Thereby the nucleophilic amine is partially neutralized by the formation of a reversible salt-like complex. However, during the subsequent rinsing, free amine groups originating both from the non-neutralized fraction and possibly from the dissociated complex fraction, will react with water and thus lead to the formation of hydroxyl ions. Thus, the use of such weak acids makes an accurate pH control difficult resulting in improper neutralization of the rinse solution which can be detrimental to the metal layer. Object of the invention It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a rinsing process for metallized substrates which are subject to metal microcorrosion allowing a controllable neutralization of the rinsing solution. This objective is attained by adding strong inorganic acids such as HNO 3 to the rinsing solution. Moreover, it was found that by using strong inorganic acids a much broader pH-range (from pH 0 to 7) can be reached either by adding controlled amounts of the acid to the rinsing solution during the rinsing step, or in another embodiment by adding it to the stripper. Brief summary of the invention In accordance with the present invention, a process for rinsing a metallized substrate who is subject to metal microcorrosion uses an acidic aqueous rinsing solution comprising at least one strong inorganic acid in an amount enough to reduce the alkalinity of the rinse solution to a level low enough to reduce microcorrosion of the metal layer while rinsing. The rinsing process can be used at any stage of the metallized substrate production where microcorrosion is possible to occur. Especially metallized wafers used in semiconductor device, and which are subject to microcorrosion due to photoresist stripping with alkanolamine comprising strippers can be rinsed by the process according to the present invention. Although inexpensive, inorganic de-ionised (DI) water rinses are particularly vulnerable of causing metal corrosion. It was found that diluted strong acid water-based rinsing solution, and preferably DI water-based rinsing solutions, particularly allow for acidification to be more controlled and aluminium alloy microcorrosion to be optimally governed. The strong inorganic acid which gives good results is nitric acid when used with a post-photoresist stripper rinse solution or in another embodiment when added to an alkanolamine comprising photoresist stripper. Other strong inorganic acids exerting the same effect can equally be added to the rinsing solution. Description of the drawings Fig. 1 represents the results of the SEM inspection for corrosion after treatment of bare and stacked aluminium lines in different acidic mixtures. (Table 1) Fig. 2 represents the results of the resistance measured for bare and stacked aluminium meander structures (length = 4.63m) after treatment with different acidic mixtures. (Table II) Fig. 3a gives the electrical yield calculated for bare Al-meander structures. Fig. 3b gives the electrical yield calculated for stacked Al-meander structures. Fig. 4 is a picture of bare aluminium lines which received an IPA-dip in order to remove the organic stripper before DI-rinsing. Fig. 5 (left) is a picture of bare Al-lines after dry-stripping. Fig. 5 (right) are bare Al-lines after wet-stripping followed by a 50 min. stay in DI-water. Fig. 6 is a picture of Al-lines treated with diluted HNO 3 (1:100 diluted) after wet-stripping. Fig. 7 is a picture of stacked Al-meander structures treated with 1:100 HCl after wet-stripping. Fig. 8 is a picture of bare Al-meanders treated with 1:100 HF after wet-stripping. Detailed description of the invention By strong inorganic acids is meant in this patent application those strong inorganic acids which can be added to the rinsing solution without significantly corroding the metallized substrate as they only negligibly attack the passivating oxide film which is always present on metals such as aluminium or aluminium alloys, hereby inhibiting the corrosion of the underlying metal. Such strong inorganic acids can be selected from the group consisting of HNO 3 , H 2 SO 4 , HI, H 3 PO 4 , H 3 CrO 4 or a mixture thereof. Preferably, the strong inorganic acid is HNO 3 . The amounts of strong inorganic acid used in the rinsing solutions of this invention are obviously dependent upon the number of metallized substrates and the kind of stripper used. For HNO 3 , good results are obtained with a 1:80 to 1:1200 diluted nitric acid solution, preferably it is a 1:100 to 1:1000 dilution and most preferably a 1:100 dilution. The metal layer of the metallized substrates whic can be rinsed according to the present invention are fc example, Al alloys. AlSiCu alloys and especially Al/1% Si/0.5 Cu alloys are particularly suited for rinsing according to th invention. Especially, the microcorrosion of aluminium alloy is preferably decreased during rinsing by using diluted nitri acid in a 1:100 to 1:1000 dilution. The rinsing solutions of the present invention ar effective in rinsing metallized wafers subjected to a wid range of organic photoresist strippers comprising a alkanolamine. Advantageously, MS-2001 (OLIN HUNT ®), a know solvent stripper can be rinsed with the rinsing solution according to the invention. In another embodiment of the invention, the rinsin solutions can also be used for rinsing metallized wafers a stages in the processing cycle other than after solven stripping. As such one can rinse metallized wafers from whic the photoresist has been removed by dry stripping. Dry stripping (commonly referred to as oxygen ashing is done using oxygen plasmas in plasma etching tools. Plasma containing oxygen produce species that attack the photoresis to form CO 2 , H 2 O, N 2 O and SO 2 as end products. Such oxyge plasmas provide a highly selective method for removing organi material like photoresist, since O 2 plasmas do not etch Si, SiO 2 and Al or Al-alloys. An overview of various designs of plasma ashing equipment is discussed by Skidmore (Semiconductc International, August 1988, p. 54). When dry strippe metallized substrates need to be rinsed or to be put in contac with water, the rinsing solutions of the present invention ar found to have little or no corrosive effect on th substrates, especially not on dry stripped photoresists with aluminium alloy layer. Examples The corrosion of aluminium alloys is evaluated in a quartz tank without circulation or filtration, both on silico: wafers, CZ-growth <100>, n-type, 1-30 Ohmcm, 150 mm diamete: wafers with bare aluminium meanders (700 nm Al/ 1 %SI/ 0.5% Cu) and with stacked meanders structures (Ti, TiN, Al/1%SI/0.5%Cu, T and TiN with a thickness of respectively 30, 80, 700, 20 and 8 nm). After the photostep and the etching (LAM_TCP ® 9600), the wafers are stripped in MS-2001 (OLIN HUNT ®) during 60 min a 90°C, followed by a 50 min stay in a stagnant tank to which diluted inorganic nitric acid (HNO 3 ) in two different mixing ratios (1:100 and 1:1000) are added. Finally, the wafers ar rinsed with DI-water for 10 min and spin dried. All rins treatments are performed at room temperature. In order to evaluate the effect of the different aci solutions on the corrosion rate of aluminium in the absence o the organic stripper, a few wafers are dry stripped using th barrel reactor type etching tool PRS800 (Plasma Technology for 45 min. and immersed in the same way as the wet strippe wafers in the different acidic solution mixtures. As reference, the processed wafers are compared with a wafer whic was stripped using an organic stripper, followed by a isopropyl alcohol (IPA) dip for 2 min. and DI-rinse. Fo statistics, two wafers are taken at each condition. Scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi 4500®) is assesse for residue inspection and linewidth loss evaluation of th aluminium lines after treatment in the different mixtures The corrosion of the aluminium is also evaluated electrically by measuring the resistance R of the metal lines since the resistance is correlated to the cross-section of the metal lines according to: R = L ρ ω t where L is the length (4.63 m or 4.51 m), ρ the resistivity (3 x 10 -8 Q m), ω the width (0.8 µm) and t the thickness (0.7 µm) of the meander lines. Measurements were performed respectively at 11 and 84 different chips for the bare and stacked Al-wafers. At each chip, 4 meander structures (two with length 4.63 m and two with length 4.51 m) are measured. From the measured resistances, the yield can be calculated according to Yield (%) = number of non-corroded meanders total number of meanders x 100 All meander types are included in the data analysis. Results The degree of corrosion of metal lines, as determined by visual inspection with SEM, after the different post-stripping treatments is summarized in table I (figure 1). The average resistance measured for the meander structure with 4.63 m length is shown in table II (figure 2), both for the bare and stacked wafers. Electrical yield is calculated with the following selection criterion: a bare Al-meander is considered to be "good" when its resistance lies in the intervals 270 - 300 kΩ and 260 - 290 kΩ respectively for the length 4.63 m and 4.51 m. As a selection criterion for the stacked meanders, the intervals are taken to be: 260 - 290 kQ and 250 - 280 kQ respectively for the long and the short structures. Thus, all shorts as well as open meanders are excluded. The results are given in figure 3a and 3b, respectively for the bare and stacked meander structures. Figure 4 shows the aluminium layer after being stripped with MS-2001 and followed by a IPA dip before a DI rinse according to the prior art. After dry stripping, residues of resist are still present on the wafer surface (see figure 5). However, the meander resistance can be accurately determined and the yield has not diminished markedly compared to the reference wafers. Reference wafers are wet stripped, followed by a IPA dip and DI rinse. When the dry-stripped wafers are put in pure DI-water, the metal lines start corroding and an increase in the resistance is observed. When the wafers are stripped with the organic stripper, without the IPA dip after stripping, the corrosion observed after the DI-rinse is even more pronounced as follows from the electrical measurements and SEM-pictures (see figure 5). When the DI rinse is replaced by a 1:100 diluted HNO 3 solution, better results are obtained. After comparison with the SEM-picture of non-corroded aluminium lines stripped via the reference procedure (see figure 4), only a minor surface degradation of the aluminium can be observed (see figure 6). This surface degradation has a rather small effect on the electrical characteristics of the meander lines: the resistance is comparable to the resistance of the reference wafers whereas figure 3 shows that the yield approximates the yield of the wafers processed using the reference conditions. The observed surface degradation can probably be attributed to the extreme testing conditions and is significantly reduced when standard rinsing conditions are used mainly because under normal circumstances, the contact time with the rinsing solution is significantly shorter. As such a 5 min. stay in the stagnant tank according to example 1 results in a non-degraded wafer surface. Two other acids are being evaluated and compared to HNO 3 . Rinsing-off the organic stripper in diluted HCl results in a very localized line degradation (see figure 7) which causes severe changes in the measured resistance and consequently a decrease of the yield. The same phenomenon is observed for the dry stripped wafers dipped in diluted HCl. Rinsing wafers with diluted HF after solvent stripping results in a very severe corrosion: metal lines are completely etched away as can be seen in figure 8. In conclusion, a post-stripping rinse solution with diluted HNO 3 is found to be effective in preventing the corrosion of aluminium alloys caused by the rinsing of organic strippers. We can therefore conclude that diluted HNO 3 -solutions offer interesting perspectives for replacing the commonly used IPA-dip after stripping and allows a more efficient pH control compared to carbonic acid comprising rinsing solutions.

Claims: Process for rinsing a metallized substrate treated with a photoresist organic stripper and subject to metal microcorrosion, using a rinsing solution characterized in that said rinsing solution comprises substantially water and at least one strong inorganic acid, in an amount which leads to a microcorrosion level of the substrate metals negligible or comparable to those obtained with the state of the art processes, in which said metallized substrate is subjected to post-stripping intermediate treatment with an organic solvent and to final water rinsing. Process according to claim 1, characterized in that the photoresist stripper is combined with organic solvents. Process according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the photoresist stripper comprises at least one alkonolamine. Process according to any of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the microcorrosion level is evaluated after treatment either by visual inspection using scanning electron microscopy or electrically by measuring the resistance of wafer metal lines. Process according to any of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the rinsing solution comprises corroding agents other than hydroxyl ions. Process according to any of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the strong inorganic acid is selected from the group consisting of HNO 3 , H 2 SO 4 , HI, H 3 PO 4 , H 3 CrO 4 or a mixture thereof. Process according to claim 6, characterized in that the strong inorganic acid is HNO 3 . Process according to any of the claims 1 to 7 characterized in that the rinse solution is a 1 : 80 to 1 : 1200 diluted nitric acid solution. Process according to claim 8, characterized in that the rinse solution is a 1 : 100 diluted nitric acid solution. Process according to any of the claims 1 to 9, characterized in that the metal layer of the metallized substrate comprises aluminium or an aluminium alloy. Process according to claim 1, characterized in that the metallized substrate subject to metal microcorrosion is a metallized wafer subjected to dry photoresist stripping. Use of nitric acid in an acidic aqueous rinsing solution for metallized substrates subject to metal corrosion, characterized in that the nitric acid is used to reduce the corrosion due to rinsing. Use of nitric acid in an acidic aqueous rinsing solution for metallized substrates subject to metal corrosion, characterized in that the nitric acid is present to reduce the alkalinity of said rinsing solution. Use of semiconductor rinsing solution comprising de-ionised water and nitric acid.

Inventors: HEYNS MARK, ROTONDARO ANTONIO, VOS RITA, HEYNS, MARK, ROTONDARO, ANTONIO, VOS, RITA
Applicants: INTERUNIVERSITAIRE MICROELEKTR, INTERUNIVERSITAIRE MICROELEKTRONICA CENTRUM VZW
Application year: 1996
Main classification: G03F7
IPC codes: G03F7, H01L21