PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS OF HIGHLY LIPOPHILIC CAMPTOTHECIN DERIVATIVES

Abstract: A pharmaceutical formulation, as a solution or suspension of pH from 2 to 6, of camptothecin or a lipophilic camptothecin derivative, having a water solubility of less than 5 micrograms/ml, in N-methylpyrrolidin-2-one.

Description: PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS OF HIGHLY LIPOPHILIC CAMPTOTHECIN DERIVATIVES Field of the Invention This invention relates to useful, novel and non- obvious formulations of camptothecin derivatives, and will have particular application to formulations of poorly water soluble (<5μg/ml) camptothecin derivatives. Background of the Invention For the purpose of this invention, poorly water soluble and highly lipophilic camptothecin derivatives (referred to as "HLCD" for the purposes of this inven¬ tion) are defined interchangeably as any unsubstituted or any A-ring and/or B-ring substituted camptothecin which has a water solubility of less than 5 micrograms per mililiter (<5μg/ml) of water. Also for the purposes of the instant invention, the terms "highly lipophilic" and "poorly water soluble" are used interchangeably to describe the fundamental bioavailability and chemical behaviour of the camptothecin derivatives. Utilizing HPLC and NMR techniques, researchers have demonstrated that camptothecin and many of its deriva¬ tives undergo an alkaline, pH-dependent hydrolysis of the E-ring lactone. The slow reaction kinetics allow one to assess whether both the lactone and non-lactone forms of the drug stabilize the topoisomerase I-cleaved DNA complex. Studies indicate that only the closed lactone form of the drug helps stabilize the cleavable complex. This observation provides reasoning for the high degree of drug activity observed in solid tumor models. Tumor cells, particularly hypoxic cells preva¬ lent in solid neoplasms, have relatively lower intracellular pH levels than normal cells. At pH levels below 7.0, the lactone E-ring form of camptothecin predominates. Formulations of camptothecin and its derivatives in the lactone form are difficult to prepare, due to the factors cited above. The poor solubility of these compounds in aqueous solution prohibits administration of effective doses. The opening of the lactone ring in alkaline formulations precludes their utility as well, due to a substantial reduction in the anti-tumor potency of the compounds. The prior art teaches the use of various organic solvents useful for camptothecin formulations. This prior art is identified in the Information Disclosure Statement accompanying this application. Such solvents include lipid-based oils, such as cottonseed oil, peanut oil, IL-20 and others, and organic solvents such as N,N- dimethylacetamide (DMA), dimethylisosorbide (DMI), and others. Solubility of the compounds in lipid-based solvents is generally less than lmg/ml, while the solu¬ bility increases to as high as about 6.7mg/ml in certain organic solvents. Summary of the Invention The formulations of this invention include as the primary solvent the compound N-methylpyrrolidin-2-one, also referred to as N-methylpyrrolidinone, or simply, NMP. The solubility of highly lipophilic, poorly water soluble camptothecin derivatives is increased to between 15.0 and 20.0mg/ml in NMP, which allows for much more concentrated solutions to be prepared in advance of formulating. The resulting higher drug concentration attained by the instant invention allows greater utility for preparing oral and parenteral formulations. The preferred formulations of this invention in¬ clude the following: (a) HLCD; (b) NMP; (c) polyethylene glycol (PEG) or propylene glycol; (d) an acid; (e) a non-ionic surfactant; and (f) a low MW alcohol. In addition, certain formulations may also include (g) a heavy oil, such as epoxylated castor oil; (h) glycerol; and (i) taurocholic acid or a pharmaceutically accept- able salt thereof, or a similar intestinal absorption enhancing agent. The solutions and formulations of this invention are able to contain a high concentration of effective ingredient due to the unpredictably high solubility of the compounds in NMP. This allows a lower solvent volume delivery to the patient to deliver the same amount of effective ingredient, which in turn results in reduced risk of toxicity and greater patient acceptance. The formulations of this invention can be tailored for various types of delivery, including parenteral, subcutaneous and oral, among others. Specific examples of oral and parenteral formulations are given in the description of the preferred embodiments which follows. Description of the Preferred Embodiments The preferred formulations disclosed below are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Rather, they have been chosen and described to explain the principles of the invention, and their application and practical use to best enable others skilled in the art to follow its teachings. The pharmaceutical formulations which comprise this invention include as basic ingredients, a pharmaceutic- ally effective amount of a highly lipophilic camptothe¬ cin derivative (HLCD) dissolved or suspended in N- methylpyrrolidin-2-one (NMP). The solubility of most HLCDs in NMP is between 15.0 and 20.0mg/ml. In formula¬ ting solutions it is desirable to use enough NMP to completely dissolve the HLCD prior to adding any other excipients or diluents. Approximate ratios for formula¬ ting solutions are between 25 parts by weight to 1,000 parts by weight NMP per part by weight of HLCD, prefer¬ ably between 50 to 500 parts by weight NMP per part HLCD, and most preferably between 100 to 300 parts by weight NMP per part HLCD. In the most preferred case, this will yield an initial NEAT solution concentration of about lmg/ml to about 40mg/ml. Suspensions, typically employed in orally adminis- tered formulations, may include significantly higher concentrations, up to 400mg/ml of the NEAT formulation. Other pharmaceutically acceptable diluents and excipients may also be included in the preferred formu¬ lations, as outlined below. Typically, a pharmaceutical formulation of HLCD will include from 1.0 to 40.0 mg of HLCD per ml of solution or lmg/ml to 400mg/ml suspen¬ sion. The pharmaceutically acceptable excipients and diluents preferably will be chosen from the following groups, keeping in mind that the exact nature of the formulation will depend upon the intended method of delivery. One of the pharmaceutically acceptable excipients included in the formulation is a pharmaceutically ac- ceptable acid, which is included to lower the pH of the formulation to between 2.0-6.0 (most preferably between 3.0-5.0) to keep the HLCD in its active lactone confi¬ guration. The preferred acid may be chosen from any one of a number of pharmaceutically acceptable mineral acids or organic acids, including hydrochloric acid, phosphor¬ ic acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, ascorbic acid, citric acid, gluconic acid, fumaric acid, maleic acid and others. The acid will preferably be employed at the ratio of 10 to 5,000 parts by weight of the HLCD, most preferably between 100 to 2,500 parts by weight per part of HLCD. Citric acid is the most preferred acid. Other excipients will include polyethylene glycol (PEG) or propylene glycol, and a non-ionic surfactant. The preferred PEG has a molecular weight of 300 to 400, most preferably 300 for parenteral formulations and 400 for oral formulations. PEG is included in the formula¬ tion at a ratio of between 100 to 10,000 parts by weight of PEG to each part by weight HLCD. The preferred surfactant is a polysorbate-based compound, most preferably polysorbate-80 (PSB-80). The surfactant is included in the formulation at a range of 100 to 10,000 parts by weight of PSB to each part by weight HLCD. Most preferably the ratio is between 250 and 6500 parts by weight PSB per part of HLCD. Parenteral formulations can optionally include a quantity of a lower alcohol, most preferably ethyl alcohol and/or benzyl alcohol, and a lipid based exci- pient, preferably castor oil, most preferably an epoxy- lated castor oil such as Cremaphor-80. The lower alcohol is incorporated into the formula¬ tion at between 0 to 5,000 parts by weight of each alcohol used per part by weight HLCD, with the maximum alcohol content being 10,000 parts by weight alcohol per part by weight of HLCD. Lipid based excipient (Cremaphor-80) is incorpora¬ ted into the formulation at between 0 to 10,000 parts by weight per part of HLCD. Oral formulations will include the above ingre¬ dients and may optionally include a quantity of glycer- ol. Preferred ratio of glycerol is 0 to 5 parts by weight glycerol per part by weight of HLCD, most prefer¬ ably 0.5 to 2.5 parts by weight per part by weight HLCD. Oral formulations may further include an intestinal absorption facilitating compound, most preferably a bile acid such as taurocholic acid or a salt thereof at from 1 to 10 parts by weight per part by weight of HLCD. Oral formulations are also preferably formulated and incorporated into a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, such as soft or hard gelatin capsules, among others, to facilitate swallowing. Table 1 below illustrates a typical pharmaceutical¬ ly acceptable formulation of HLCD/NMP adapted for par¬ enteral administration to a patient. TABLE 1 COMPONENT PARTS FOR PARENTERAL FORMULATIONS OF HLCD Ingredients pts by wt HLCD 1 (l-40mg/ml) Ethyl Alcohol 0 to 5,000 Benzyl Alcohol 0 to 5,000 Acid 100 to 5,000 PEG 400 100 to 10,000 NMP 25 to 10,000 Cremaphor-EL 100 to 10,000 Glycerol 0 to 2.5 Taurocholic Acid 0 to 10 Polysorbate 80 100 to 10,000 (Tween-80) Parenteral formulations are typically diluted with a common delivery solution such as 5% dextrose USP, lactated Ringer's solution or aqueous saline prior to administration to the patient. Preferred oral formulations of HLCD/NMP are illu¬ strated in Table 2. TABLE 2 COMPONENT PARTS FOR ORAL FORMULATION OR HLCD Ingredients pts by wt HLCD 1 (l-400mg/ml) NMP 25 to 1,000 Citric Acid 100 to 5,000 EtOH 100 to 5,000 Polysorbate-80 100 to 10,000 (Tween-80) PEG-400 100 to 10,000 Glycerin 1.5 to 2.5 Taurocholic Acid 1 to 10 Oral formulations are preferably encapsulated in a suitable carrier for oral delivery, typically gelatin capsules. Preferred HLCD's used as active ingredients in the above formulations include camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives which have a solubility of less than 5 micrograms per millileter of water. Included in this group are CPT derivatives which have substitutions at one or more of the following positions on the molecule: (a) 7-substitutions; (b) 9-substitutions; (c) 10- substitutions; and (d) 11-substitutions; or any combina¬ tion of the, above in a di- or tri-substituted CPT deri¬ vative having a solubility of <5μg/ml in water. Most preferred derivatives of CPT which fit into the category of HLCD are 10,11-methylenedioxy camptothecin, 10,11- ethylenedioxy camptothecin, 7-ethyl camptothecin, 7- ethyl-10-hydroxy camptothecin, 9-methyl camptothecin, 9- chloro-10, 11-methylenedioxy camptothecin, 9-chloro camptothecin, 10-hydroxy camptothecin, 9,10-dichloro camptothecin, 10-bromo camptothecin, 10-chloro campto¬ thecin, 9-fluoro camptothecin, 10-methyl camptothecin, 10-fluoro camptothecin, 9-methoxy camptothecin, 9- chloro-7-ethyl CPT, and 11-fluoro camptothecin. Other HLCDs will also fit the profile for the most preferred active compounds and their inclusion into these formula¬ tions can be achieved with a minimum amount of experi- mentation. The following specific examples illustrate the most preferred formulations which constitute this invention. These formulations are included to illustrate the best modes of making the formulations are not introduced to limit the invention in any way. Examples 1 and 2 Solubility of CPT and 7-ethyl CPT in NMP (1) A mixture of CPT (14mg) and NMP (1ml) was sonicated in a clean vial at 50 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes. The solution appeared clear and no precipitation or cloudiness appeared even after 72 hours at ambient temperature. (2) A mixture of 7-ethyl CPT (11.5mg) and NMP (0.5ml) was sonicated in a clean vial at 50 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes. The solution appeared clear and no precipi¬ tation or cloudiness appeared even after 1 week at ambient temperature. Examples 3 and 4 Th Following NMP Formulations were Prepared Formulation #1 Ethanol 6.4ml Citric Acid l.Og PEG 300 50g NMP 10.7ml TWEEN 80 lOg The above ingredients were mixed in the above order. First citric acid was dissolved in ethanol by sonication at 50 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes. Formulation #2 Ethanol 20.3ml Benzyl Alcohol 3.44ml Citric Acid 4.0g PEG 300 40g NMP 8.55ml TWEEN 80 8.0g The above ingredients were mixed in the above order. First citric acid was dissolved in ethanol by sonication at 50 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes. Example 3: Solubility of CPT in Formulation #1 Solutions of CPT in above Formulation #1 were prepared at concentrations of 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5mg of CPT in 1ml of formulation. The mixtures were sonicated at 50 degrees Celsius for 60 min. There were no cloudi¬ ness, suspension or precipitation. The mixtures were filtered through 0.2 micron filter. The mixtures were diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution and studied for the appearance of Tyndall effect as given in the following tables: Table 1: CPT 0.3mg/ml of formulation #1, with dilution by 0.9% NaCl solution Dilution O min 15 min 30 min 45 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 1 day 1:1 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:2 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:5 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:10 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:100 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear j clear Table 2: CPT 0.4mg/ml of formulation #1, with dilution by 0.9% NaCl solution Dilution O min 15 min 30 min 45 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 1 day 1:1 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:2 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear . — 1:5 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:10 clear clear 1:100 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear Table 3: CPT 0.5mg/ml of formulation #1, withdilutionby0.9% NaCl solution Example 4: Solubility of 7-ethyl CPT in Formulation #1 Solutions of 7-ethyl CPT in above Formulation #1 were prepared at concentrations of 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 and l.O g of 7-ethyl CPT in 1ml of formulation. The mix¬ tures were sonicated at 50 degrees Celsius for 60 rain. There were no cloudiness, suspension or precipitation. The mixtures were filtered through 0.2 micron filter. The mixtures were diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution and studied for the appearance of Tyndall effect as given in the following tables: Table 4: 7-ethyl CPT 0.5mg/ml of formulation #1, with dilution by 0.9% NaCl solution Dilution O min 15 min 30 min 45 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 1 day 1:1 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:2 clear clear clear clear dear clear clear clear 1:5 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1 :10 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:100 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear Table 5: 7-ethyl CPT 0.6mg/ml of formulation #1, with dilution by 0.9% NaCl solution Dilution O min 15 min 30 min 45 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 1 day 1:1 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:2 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:5 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:10 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:100 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear Table 6 : 7-ethyl CPT 0. 7mg/ml of formulation #1 , with dilution by 0.9% NaCl solution Table 7 : 7-ethyl l . Omg/ml of formulation #1 , with dilu¬ tion by 0.9% NaCl solution Dilution 0 min 15 min 30 min 45 min 60 min 90 min 120 min l day 1:1 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:2 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:5 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear 1:10 clear clear — 1:100 clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A pharmaceutical formulation, as a solution or suspension of pH from 2 to 6, of camptothecin or a lipophilic camptothecin derivative, having a water solubility of less than 5 micrograms/ml, in N-methylpyr- rolidin-2-one. 2. A formulation according to Claim 1, further includ¬ ing one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. 3. A formulation according to Claim 2, wherein the excipient(s) are polyethylene glycol, epoxylated castor oil, an aliphatic alcohol of 1 to 4 carbon atoms or benzyl alcohol. 4. A formulation according to Claim 3, wherein the aliphatic alcohol is ethanol. 5. A formulation according to Claim 1, 2, 3 or 4, further including taurocholic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. 6. A formulation according to Claim 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, further including a non-ionic surfactant. 7. A formulation according to Claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6, wherein the concentration of the camptothecin or derivative thereof is from 1.0 mg/ml to the solubility or suspendibility limit. 8. A formulation according to Claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6, wherein the camptothecin derivative is a 7-ethyl, 7- ethyl-10-hydroxy, 10, 11-methylenedioxy, 10, 11-ethylene- dioxy, 9-methyl, 9-chloro-10, 11-methylenedioxy, 9- chloro, 10-hydroxy, 9, 10-dichloro, 10-bromo, 10-chloro, 9-fluoro, 10-methyl, 10-fluoro, 9-methoxy, 9-chloro-7- ethyl or 11-fluoro derivative. 9. A formulation according to Claim 1, comprising the following components in proportions lying within the following ranges, all weight/weight of the camptothecin or derivative thereof: a) 25-1,000 parts of N-methylpyrrolidin-2-one, b) 100-5,000 parts of a pharmaceutically acceptable acid, c) 0-10 parts of a taurocholic acid or a pharmaceutic ally acceptable salt thereof, d) 0-2.5 parts of glycerol, e) 100-10,000 parts of polyethylene glycol, f) 100-5,000 parts of an aliphatic alcohol having 1 to 4 carbon atoms or benzyl alcohol, g) 100-10,000 parts of a non-ionic surfactant, h) 0-10,000 parts of epoxylated castor oil. 10. A formulation according to Claim 9 diluted with a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent to form a deliver¬ able solution, wherein the concentration of the campto¬ thecin or derivative thereof is from 0.001 to 1.0 mg/ml.

Inventors: HARIDAS KOCHAT, HAUSHEER FREDERICK HERMAN, MURALI DHANABALAN, REDDY DASHARATHA GAURAVARAM, HARIDAS, KOCHAT, HAUSHEER, FREDERICK, HERMAN, MURALI, DHANABALAN, REDDY, DASHARATHA, GAURAVARAM
Applicants: BIONUMERIK PHARMACEUTICALS INC, HARIDAS KOCHAT, HAUSHEER FREDERICK HERMAN, LUCAS BRIAN RONALD, MURALI DHANABALAN, REDDY DASHARATHA GAURAVARAM, BIONUMERIK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., HARIDAS, KOCHAT, HAUSHEER, FREDERICK, HERMAN, LUCAS, BRIAN, RONALD, MURALI, DHANABALAN, REDDY, DASHARATHA, GAURAVARAM
Application year: 1996
Main classification: A61K31
IPC codes: A61K9, A61K31, A61K47