MAGNIFICATION CORRECTION FOR SMALL FIELD SCANNING

Abstract: Magnification correction for small field scanning of large blanks is provided by adding magnification adjusting elements (lenses 712, 714, 722, 724) to a double pass Wynne-Dyson lens (770) or other type of one-to-one projection lens. The magnification adjusting optical elements include two pairs (710, 720) of low power lenses, one associated with each of the input and output prisms (731, 732) of a Wynne-Dyson lens. Movement of the magnification adjusting optics provides positive or negative magnification as needed to correct for any expansion or compaction of the blank (160) relative to the reticle (120) and hence maintain alignment. Further magnification correction is provided by a small velocity relative movement between reticle (120) and blank (160) by means of a secondary stage in the scan direction. This corrects for any alignment error in the scan direction and may be used independently of the optical correction technique with any type of projection lens.

Description: MAGNIFICATION CORRECTION FOR SMALL FIELD SCANNING BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention This invention relates to photolithography and more specifically to magnification correction for small field photolithography scanning. Description of Related Art The fabrication of flat panel displays (FPD's) for use e.g. in notebook computers is a well known process typically using photolithography techniques similar to those used in integrated circuit (I.e.) processing. However, FPD's are typically fabricated on very large substrates (or blanks) . A typical flat panel display measures approximately 8 inches x 6 inches; and four or more such displays are fabricated on a single glass blank. Thus the blanks for flat panel displays are much larger than integrated circuits (ICs) and larger than silicon substrates, which are typically no more than 12 inches in diameter, used in IC fabrication. Conventional single projection lithography systems are ill suited for such large blanks because of the high cost of optics which can project a precise image the size of the blank. Conventional step-and-repeat lithography systems, such as those manufactured by Nikon Precision, Inc. and MRS, Inc., partition a blank into blocks which are individually exposed. Step-and-repeat systems allow use of optics with smaller field size (the size of a block) but have difficulty aligning blocks precisely enough to provide uniform exposure at boundaries between the blocks. Accordingly, the speed of a step- and-repeat system may be reduced by alignments required after each step. Additionally, when patterns for different blocks differ, frequent reticle changes further reduce output. In a typical step-and-repeat system for IC manufacturing, each block is at least the size of a complete IC or die to avoid boundary problems and reticle changes. Optical systems with fields the size of a complete FPD are often too expensive to be practical. In contrast, small field scanning systems scan a large reticle, equal in size to the blank, with a unity magnification optics to expose overlapping stripes on the blank. Typically, small field scanning systems use less expensive optics with a field only as wide as a single stripe, typically about 30 mm. Some small field scanning systems include Wynne- Dyson optics and image reversing optic. Conventional Wynne-Dyson optics in such systems are between the reticle and the blank and include an input prism, an output prism, a concave mirror, and optionally a lens. Light from the reticle reflects from the input prism to the concave mirror, back to the output prism, and then out to form an image on the blank. A problem with Wynne-Dyson optics is image reversal caused by the reflections. Image reversal forms a reverted image having a left side which appears to be the right side of the object, and vice versa. Conventional lithography systems are unable to scan using a reverted image projected onto a blank and therefore must add optical elements to remove the image reversal of the Wynne-Dyson optics. U.S. patent No. 5,285,236 entitled "Large-Area, High-Throughput, High-Resolution Projection Imaging System", to Jain, and U.S. patent No. 4,171,870 entitled "Compact Image Projection Apparatus", to Burning et al., are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety and describe Wynne-Dyson projection optics having output prisms (or roof prisms) with faces that cause additional refection to remove the image reversal. U.S. patent No. 5,298,939 to Swanson et al., entitled "Method and Apparatus for Transfer of a Reticle Pattern onto a Substrate by Scanning", which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, describes using two Wynne-Dyson optical systems. A first Wynne-Dyson optical system forms a reverted image of a reticle, and the second Wynne-Dyson optical system reverses the reverted image to form a final image which is erect and non-reversed. The optical systems described in the above noted patents have disadvantages. For example, roof prisms can cause multiple images if the prism is not precisely fabricated. A roof prism also increases the glass path length which typically reduces field size. The optical system described in Swanson et al. doubles the cost for Wynne-Dyson optics and doubles the space required between the reticle and blank. Another concern in fabricating flat panel displays is that the blank is typically a glass such as a soda lime glass which unlike the silicon used in IC fabrication, is subject to significant compaction (shrinkage) during high temperature processing steps. Typical compaction of these glass substrates during all of processing is e.g. approximately 10 to 100 parts per million in length and width. The lithography techniques which form patterns on a glass blank must properly align the various masks (reticles) to the blank which shrinks progressively during processing. Typically, the masks or reticles are sized to the nominal size of the image to be lithographed onto the blank. One approach makes a reticle size equal the expected blank size. This undesirably requires accurate characterization of the fabrication process to predict the size of the blank after shrinkage and is relatively expensive and complex. An alternative is to accept misalignment errors due to the blank shrinkage. Accepting such misalignment is generally not considered desirable since alignment errors result in degradation of the product and hence increase cost due to decreased yield. In addition to the shrinkage of the glass blank caused by processing, another complication is that the temperature of a reticle when the reticle is made may differ from the temperature of the reticle during the projection onto a blank. The blank and the reticle expand and contract with temperature, and a difference between the coefficients of thermal expansion for the reticle and blank further complicates alignment. Even if the fabrication process has been characterized and the reticles correspondingly sized, in the absence of tight temperature controls during processing, misalignment errors still occur. Thus broadly a goal of lithography is to improve alignment between a reticle (or other pattern source) and a blank when the blank and/or reticle are subject to dimensional changes during processing. In flat panel display processing technology, the commercially available MRS stepper (a step-and-repeat system) includes a feature called "panel scale" for a type of magnification correction for flat panel processing. This apparatus includes a non-telecentric object plane which allows the reticle to be moved toward or away from the optics to slightly alter the magnification and focus of the image of a reticle. In the wafer processing industry, another technique is described in "Variable Magnification in a 1:1 Projection Lithography System" by James J. Greed et al., SPIE Volume 334 Optical Microlithography - Technology for the Mid-1980s, 1982. A Perkin-Elmer apparatus is intended to correct for temperature effects on reticles and wafers in a conventional integrated circuit semiconductor fabrication scanning mask aligner. In such scanning mask aligners, each scanning stripe exposes a pattern at least as wide an entire I.e. die on the wafer. Scanning the image of the reticle across the wafer exposes patterns for multiple dice. This differs from small field scanning such as used in fabricating flat panel displays. For flat panel display fabrication, each individual display on the blank is exposed by several overlapping stripes. Thus, small field scanning involves stripe abutment and alignment concerns not present in a conventional stepper systems and requires optical projection systems different from a stepper or an scanning mask aligner for ICs. Photolithographic techniques for small field scanning of large blanks, such as used for fabrication of structures including flat panel displays, multi-chip modules, ICs, and printed circuit boards, need improvement. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the invention, two types of apparatuses and methods provide optical magnification correction and relative motion magnification correction for small field photolithography scanning. These apparatuses and methods may be used in conjunction or independently as described below. One type of apparatus provides optical magnification correction through magnification adjusting optics. One embodiment of the magnification adjusting optics has two sets of lens elements, one associated with light entering, and one associated with light leaving a projection lens. The projection lens may be of any type and is not restricted to the conventional or the double pass Wynne-Dyson optics disclosed below. Each set of lens elements contains a plano-convex element and a plano-concave element which define a narrow meniscus air gap. The elements are long radius, low power elements of equal radii and provide a combination with almost no optical power. Moving the elements to narrow one air gap and widen the other slightly changes magnification and image size produced by the projection lens. Another embodiment includes a projection lens which is a double pass Wynne-Dyson optical system having unity magnification. The double pass Wynne- Dyson optical system includes an input reflector, a lens, a concave mirror, folding optics, and an output reflector. The input reflector receives light from an object and reflects the light through a first quadrant of the lens. The concave mirror has the same optical axis as the lens and reflects light from the first quadrant of the lens back through a second quadrant of the lens, into the folding optics. The folding optics directs light from the second quadrant of the lens through a third quadrant of the lens and back to the concave mirror. The concave mirror reflects light from the third quadrant of the lens through a fourth quadrant of the lens and into the output reflector. The output reflector reflects light from the fourth quadrant of the lens into a plane where a final image forms. The focusing properties of the lens and the mirror are typically selected so that the double pass Wynne-Dyson optical system has a magnifying power of one, and forms and intermediate image in a middle plane of the folding optics. Typically, the input reflector, the output reflector, and the folding optics include an input prism, an output prism, and a folding prism respectively. The double pass Wynne-Dyson optical system is modified in one embodiment to provide magnification correction by including magnification adjusting optics associated with the input and output prisms or by including magnification adjusting optics in the folding prism. In one embodiment of the magnification adjusting optics, each of the input and output prisms has an associated set of elements. Each set contains a plano-convex element and a plano-concave element which define a narrow air gap and operate as described above. A field stop inserted in a gap formed in the folding prism facilitates accurate imaging of a selected portion of the object plane. This eliminates the need for an aperture in the illumination system which must be precisely aligned with the imaging optics to select the portion of the reticle imaged. There is no requirement to use both the field stop and the magnification adjusting optics; they function independently, and each provides its own advantages. The magnification adjusting optical elements may be conventional spherical lenses with their optical axis approximately coincident with the centers of the input and output prisms so that a ray along the optical axis of the magnification adjusting elements is reflected along a line through the center of the field stop. Alternatively, in a double pass Wynne-Dyson optical system, the magnification adjusting optical elements are each quarter sections of a circular element and are bonded to the input and output prisms, so that the optical axis of these quarter sections is coincident with the optical axis of the remainder of the elements of the system. In another embodiment, the magnification adjusting lens elements are inserted inside the gap in the folding prism. In this embodiment, the magnification adjusting optics contains only three elements, a central symmetric convex (or concave) element and two corresponding plano-concave (or plano-convex) elements bonded to inside surfaces of the folding prism. The magnification adjustment in this embodiment is accomplished by moving the central symmetric element slightly to provide positive or negative magnification correction. The magnification adjusting optics are effective in changing the magnification of the small field so as to match the image from the reticle to any compaction (or expansion) of the blank . and is independent of the projection lens type. In particular, embodiments of magnification optics in accordance with this invention are not limited to the double pass Wynne-Dyson optical systems or any other particular type of projection syste . In addition to optical magnification correction, it has been found beneficial to move the reticle relative to the blank in a continuous fashion while scanning, so as to correct for the compaction (or expansion) of the blank relative to the reticle over the entire length of the blank. The relative motion can compensate for the reticle and blank being different in length along a scanning direction. Relative motion of the reticle and blank is also advantageous to compensate for length differences along an indexing direction perpendicular to the exposed stripes. Thus to provide full magnification correction in a small field scanning system, a combination of optical image correction and relative reticle-blank movement is advantageous. The relative motion between the blank and the reticle may be on the part of either. A slight relative velocity is imparted to either the reticle or the blank as the two are being scanned, for instance by means of a secondary stage which moves the reticle or blank relative to the other. The amount of relative velocity is proportional to the amount of magnification correction required. Hence, any alignment error in the scan direction due to blank compaction or expansion can be corrected. The relative motion magnification correction is independent of the optical magnification correction, and each may be used independently. Use of the relative motion magnification correction can selectively correct magnification in one direction. For example, one could adjust the separation of each scan stripe by a distance which divides the total magnification correction needed among all of the stripes in the indexing direction. Without optical magnification correction, some residual uncorrected misalignment remains, i.e. the 10 to 100 parts per million of the blank compaction across the diameter of the scan field, which is typically 30 to 40 mm. The relative motion between the reticle and the blank may be provided in any number of ways, and the embodiment disclosed herein of a secondary stage for the reticle or blank moving relative to the stage holding the other of the reticle or blank is merely one example. Typically, this relative motion is provided by a microstepper or other precision motor driving the secondary stage under control of a conventional control mechanism receiving feedback from the reticle alignment system. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 shows a perspective view of an illuminator, a reticle, projection optics, and a blank in a photolithography system in accordance with an embodiment of this invention. Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D show views of alternative embodiments of the system of Fig. 1. Fig. 3 shows a perspective view of another photolithography system in accordance with an embodiment of this invention. Figs. 4A and 4B show quadrants of a lens from the embodiment of Fig. 3 and relations between the quadrants and images formed. Figs. 5A and 5B show a ray trace diagram of an embodiment of a double pass Wynne-Dyson optical system in accordance with an embodiment of this invention. Fig. 6 shows ray traces illustrating vignetting caused by prisms in an embodiment of this invention. Figs. 7A, 7B, and 7C show perspective views of portions of a small field photolithography scanning system having double pass Wynne-Dyson optics and magnification adjusting optics in accordance with this invention. Figs. 8A and 8B show a ray trace diagram of an embodiment of a double pass Wynne-Dyson optical system in accordance with an embodiment of this invention. Fig. 9 shows a folding prism which contains magnification adjusting optics in accordance with this invention. Fig. 10 shows a folding prism with a base block to reduce vignetting. Use of the same reference symbols in different figures indicates similar or identical items. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Opposing Motion Scanning Fig. 1 is a perspective view of major optical components in a small field scanning photo-lithography system 100 which employs opposing motion scanning in accordance with an embodiment of this invention. In system 100, a blank 160, typically a semiconductor wafer, a circuit board, or glass substrate coated with light sensitive photoresist or emulsion, is mounted on a support (not shown) parallel and opposite to a reticle 120 on its own support having an opaque pattern 122 to be transferred to blank 160. A conventional illuminator 110 such as a laser or a mercury arc lamp illuminates a portion of reticle 120 with light at wavelengths capable of changing (or "exposing") the photoresist on blank 160. Illuminator 110 may be movably mounted or may contain optics for changing the portion of reticle 120 illuminated. Illuminator 110 typically contains a field stop (not shown) which restricts illumination of reticle 120 to a region having a preselected size and shape. A conventional Wynne-Dyson optical system 170 collects the light passing through reticle 120 and forms a portion of an image 162 on blank 160. Wynne- Dyson optical system 170 includes an input prism 131, a lens 140, a mirror 150, and an output prism 132. Typically, lens 140 is a converging lens, and mirror 150 is a concave spherical mirror. The term Wynne- Dyson optical systems as used herein includes to a catadioptric lenses with one reflecting surface and is not limited to optical systems where lens 140 and concave mirror 150 have approximately the same center of curvature. Light collected by input prism 131 passes through the upper half of lens 140 before being reflected by concave mirror 150. Light reflected from concave mirror 150 passes through the lower half of lens 140, and output prism 132 reflects that light on to blank 160 forming a portion of image 162 on blank 160. The imaging properties of Wynne-Dyson optical system 170 is determined primarily by lens 140 and concave mirror 150. Typically, lens 140 and concave mirror 150 have separation and focal lengths selected to form a unity magnification image on blank 160 because at unity magnification, symmetry of the optical system causes the transverse aberrations, distortion, lateral color aberrations, and coma to be identically zero. Optical system 170 has a field which less than the size of pattern 122 on reticle 120 and image 162 on blank 160. Scanning by moving reticle 120 and blank 160 relative to illuminator 110 and optical system 170 exposes stripe as wide as the aperture of optical system 170 and as long as the distance moved. If the stripe is narrower than the width of blank 160, the remaining portions of blank 160 are exposed by indexing (i.e. shifting perpendicular to the stripe) either optical system 170 and illuminator 110 or reticle 120 and blank 160. After indexing a next stripe is exposed. During scanning, motion perpendicular to an optical axis 175 of lens 140 and optical mirror 150 cannot be performed in a conventional manner, such as moving illuminator 110 and optical system 170 relative to reticle 120 and blank 160, because the combination of reflections by input prism 131, concave mirror 150, and output prism 132 in optical system 170 causes image 162 to be reverted along a reverted axis which perpendicular to optical axis 175. For image 162 to be correctly formed, a left edge 126 of reticle 120 must be imaged on a right edge 164 of blank 160, and a right edge 124 of reticle 120 must be imaged on a left edge 166 of blank 160. Printing pattern 122 mirrored along axis 175 and moving reticle 120 and blank 160 in opposite directions perpendicular to axis 175 corrects for the image reversal. Moving reticle 120 and blank 160 in opposite directions has the advantages of offering near recoilless operation during acceleration of reticle 120 and blank 160 and allows use of relatively simple Wynne-Dyson optic system 170. Fig. 2A shows a perspective view of a photolithography system which employs projection optics, such as optical system 170, which forms a reverted image. The projection optics are mounted in a lens housing 270 which contains an aperture 210 through which light from illuminator 110 reaches the projection optics. Lens housing 270 is mounted on a precision stage 275 which moves the projection optics and aperture 210 along a Y axis. The Y axis is perpendicular to the reverted axis of the projection optics. Typically, stage 275 is an air bearing stage moved by a linear motor operated by a control unit (not shown). Position measurement devices 247, such as laser interferometers, measure the position of lens housing 270 and transmit the measurements to the control unit. Reticle 120 is mounted on a secondary stage 220 which is mounted a stage 225. Blank 160 is mounted on a secondary stage 260 which is mounted a stage 265. The control unit controls movement of stages 220, 225, 260, and 265 according to measurements provided by measurement devices 242 and 246 and a conventional alignment system (not shown) in lens housing 270. Secondary stage 220 is a precision stage capable of movement along the Y axis and rotation about a Z axis for conventional alignment operations which align reticle 120 with blank 160. Secondary stage 260 is a precision stage capable of movement along the X axis for fine motion control and movement along the Z axis to move the surface of blank 160 to the image plane of the projection optics. Stages 225 and 265 are precision stages, such as air bearing stages, which move along the X axis, the axis reverted by the projection optics. Movement along the X axis can be for scanning or indexing. The control unit controls linear motors which move reticle 120 (stage 220) in a direction opposite to the movement of blank 160 (stage 260) , but a slight difference in movement may be imparted to correct magnification as described below. Figs. 2B and 2C show profile views of another mechanism for moving reticle 120 and blank 160 during scanning or indexing. Reticle 120 and blank 160 are mounted on stages 220 and 260 respectively which are mounted on a drive belt system 250. In one embodiment, belt system 250 moves reticle 120 and blank 160 in opposite directions while exposing a stripe on blank 160. Fig. 2B shows starting positions of reticle 120 and blank 160 for a stripe. In the starting position, optical system 170 forms an image of left edge 126 of reticle 120 on right edge 164 of blank 160. Reticle 120 and blank 160 move in opposite directions while optical system 170 forms a stripe of image 162, until reticle 120 and blank 160 reach the position shown in Fig. 2C where optical system 170 forms an image of right edge 124 of reticle 120 on left edge 166 of blank 160. Belt system 250 keeps motions and displacements of reticle 120 and blank 160 equal and opposite which reduces recoil and vibrations which may disturb imaging. Stage 220 or 260 can change the relative motion and displacements of reticle 120 and blank 160 to compensate for shrinkage of blank 160 or correct the magnification of optical system 170. Magnification correction is disclosed in greater detail below. Once reticle 120 and blank 160 reach the positions shown in Fig. 2C, indexing either reticle 120 and blank 160 or illuminator 110 and optical system 170 prepares blank 160 for exposure of another stripe. Stages 220 and 260 can move reticle 120 and blank 160 parallel to axis 175. Alternatively, optical system 170 and the illumination on reticle 120 move in a direction parallel to axis 175 during indexing. The direction of motion of belt system 250 is reversed for formation of the next stripe. Fig. 2D shows a profile view of capstan or frictional drive mechanism for moving reticle 120 and blank 160 during scanning or indexing. In the system of Fig. 2D, stages 220 and 260 are mounted on precision bearings (not shown) and in frictional contact with a roller 280. The precision bearings maintain the spacing and orientation of stages 220 and 260 while rotation of roller 280 moves stages 220 and 260 in opposite directions. Several variations of the scanning method disclosed above are possible. For example, movement of belt system 250 or roller 280 can perform indexing, while stages 220 and 260 move reticle 120 and blank 160 along axis 175 to form stripes. Scanning can be performed in reciprocating directions, or in typewriter fashion in one direction. Double Pass Wynne-Dyson Optics Fig. 3 shows a small field scanning photo¬ lithography system 300 according to another embodiment of the invention. System 300 includes conventional illuminator 110 which illuminates a portion of reticle 120 containing an opaque pattern 322. A double pass Wynne-Dyson optical system 370 in accordance with this embodiment forms on blank 160 a non-reverted image pattern 362 of pattern 322 from the light transmitted through transparent portions of reticle 120. Prism 331 internally reflects incident light from reticle 120 so that the light passes though lens 340 to a concave mirror 350. Fig. 4A shows a front view of lens 340. Light from prism 331 passes through a first quadrant 410 of lens 340 and is transmitted to concave mirror 350 (Fig. 3) . Concave mirror 350 reflects light from quadrant 410 of lens 340 back through a second quadrant 420 of lens 340 into folding optics such as folding prism 332 in Fig. 3. The light is internally reflected off a first face 332A of folding prism 332. Lens 340 and concave mirror 350 are selected so that an image of pattern 322 forms at a middle plane of prism 332. A second face 332B of prism 332 reflects incident light through a third quadrant 430 of lens 340 back to concave mirror 350. Concave mirror 350 reflects light from quadrant 430 back through a fourth quadrant 440 of lens 340 into an output prism 333 which reflects the light onto blank 160. Light passes through lens 340 four times before being focused on blank 160, which is the equivalent of passing twice through a conventional Wynne-Dyson optical system. The first pass, the optical path from the object plane on reticle 120 to the intermediate image, is completely symmetric with the second pass, the optical path from the intermediate image to final image 362 on blank 160; and the second pass undoes the image reversal caused by conventional Wynne-Dyson optics. Fig. 4A shows the changes in orientation 412, 422, 432, and 442 caused by the reflections at prism 331, concave mirror 350, prism 332, and concave mirror 350, respectively. The orientation of the pattern 322 is the same as the orientation of the image 362. Accordingly, conventional processes for moving reticle 320 and blank 360 in the same direction relative to illuminator 110 and optical system 370 may be employed. A trapezoidal aperture 444 shown in Fig. 4B is typically used to provide even exposure during scanning. As is well known in the art, sloped sides 444A and 444B of aperture 444 provide less light nearer the edges of a stripe so that the combined exposure of overlapping stripes does not overexpose (or underexpose) the edges of the stripes. The size of aperture 444 and therefore the width of stripes exposed during scanning depends upon the usable area of lens 340. An area 446 of lens 340 near the diameters which divide the lens into quadrants 410, 420, 430, and 440 is unusable because vignetting caused by input and output prisms 331 and 333 as disclosed below. Aperture 444 maximizes the width of each stripe when the scanning direction is perpendicular to the parallel sides of aperture 444. For this orientation, an optical axis 375 of lens 340 and concave mirror 350 is at a 45°angle with the scanning direction. A typical goal for optical system 370 for use in flat panel display photolithography is a resolution of at least 2 microns and a useable field size or stripe width, as determined by the mean width of aperture 444, of at least 30 mm. The resolution requirement translates into a numerical aperture (NA) greater than 0.17 at a wavelength λ of 436 n using the rule R = 0.8 λ/NA. In order to analyze double pass Wynne-Dyson optical system 370 in a conventional optical design program such as GENII or OSLO available from Sinclair Optics, Inc. of Fairport, New York, light rays are unfolded at the four reflections in prisms 331, 332, and 333. This results in an analogous layout having two identical lenses 340 facing each other with prisms 331, 332, and 333 replaced by appropriate glass thicknesses. Distortion and lateral color aberrations are absent because of the symmetry of system 370; and, since the intermediate image plain is telecentric, coma is absent. The design task becomes optimizing the curvatures, thicknesses, and glass types to reduce the optical path differences across the pupil for different field positions at the wavelengths used, and to minimize the field curvature. A challenge of the design is placing the image and object planes (in the actual folded configuration) outside the radius of concave mirror 350 while maintaining adequate thickness of the small low index elements and controlling the aberrations at the edge of the field. Table 1 list optical parameters of one specific embodiment of optical system 370, which is optimized at the g (436 nm) and h (405 nm) mercury lines from illuminator 110. I-line designs are possible although more difficult due to the limited selection of non-solarizing optical glasses. Table 1 Surface Radius (mm) Distance (mm) Material 501 00 15.173 (Object) Air 502 oo 120.1329 LAKN7 503 oo 26.1855 KF6 504 -125.9625 143.5505 SF2 505 -280.7935 727.8927 Air 506 -1010.6241 -727.8927 Air 505 -280.7935 -143.5505 SF2 504 -125.9625 -26.1855 KF6 509 oo -101.7174 LAKN7 510 oo 0 (Intermediate image) Each row of Table 1 identifies a surface shown in Fig. 5A, a radius of curvature of the surface, a distance to a next surface, and a material traversed to reach the next surface. In Table 1, negative thicknesses indicate rays traveling backward after the reflection from primary mirror 350 at a surface 506. SF2, KF6, and LAKN7 are respectively a light flint glass, a dense flint glass, and a dense crown glass commercially available from Schott Glass Technologies, Duryea, Pennsylvania. The rays shown Fig. 5A travel from an object plane 501 at reticle 120, through input prism 331 of LAKN7 glass, through compound lens 340 having elements of KF6 and SF2 glasses. Compound lens 340 contains an achromat between mirror 350 and the center of curvature of mirror 350 to correct for chromatic aberrations between the 436 nm and 405 nm wavelengths used. Light rays from lens 340 reflect off surface 506 of mirror 350 and pass back through compound lens 340, into folding prism 332 of LAKN7 glass where an intermediate image is formed at a middle plane 510 inside folding prism 332. Output prism 333 which is also made of LAKN7 glass is omitted from Fig. 5A to better illustrate the light rays forming the intermediate image in folding prism 332. Fig. 5B shows optical system 370 from middle plane 510 of folding prism 332 out through output prism 333 to blank 160. The rays shown in Fig. 5B are completely symmetric with the rays shown in Fig. 5A but traverse the elements in reverse order. The rays traced in Figs. 5A and 5B are at a full 50 mm field height and set the scale for the lens drawing. The primary mirror is 269 mm in diameter. The length of the assembly, from primary mirror surface to surface of lens 340 to which the prisms 331, 332, and 333 are bonded, is 898 mm. Table 2 lists design and performance parameters for the embodiment of Table 1. Table 2 Field radius 50 mm Maximum useable field width 41.7 mm Numerical aperture 0.20 Wavelength correction 436 & 405 nm Maximum OPD 0.12 λ Field flatness 2.6 microns Telecentricity 3.8 mR Primary mirror clearance 1 mm Working distance 15.2 mm The field radius is the maximum image ray height from optical axis 375. The maximum useable field width is the longest chord that can be imaged after the field size has been reduce to account for vignetting. The maximum OPD (optical path difference) numbers include both wavelengths at the same focal position and include contributions from field curvature as well as all other aberrations. The field flatness is the total range, in both wavelengths, for the paraxial sagittal and tangential focuses across the unvignetted field. Some improvement can be expected in both the OPD and field flatness performance if these values are optimized for only those field positions used in trapezoidal aperture 444 (Fig. 4B) for overlapping scans. The primary mirror clearance is the available air space between the edge of primary mirror 350 and reticle 120. There may be some opportunity to increase the primary mirror clearance either by forcing the design, decreasing the numerical aperture slightly, or by machining flats on the primary mirror to provide a few more millimeters of clearance. The working distance is the distance between the last optical surface (output prism 333) and the image plane. An unfolded description of optical system 370 is useful for analysis using a lens design program such as GENII but does not account for vignetting caused by input, output, and folding prisms 331, 333, and 332. However, vignetting can be calculated manually from the geometry of prisms 331, 332, and 333 and optical information from a lens design program. Regions of the field for which principal rays are close to the prism boundaries, near the 45° angles or at the sides, are vignetted. Fig. 6 illustrates a region subject to vignetting. A point 610 on an object has a boundary ray 620 which is the limit of the cone of rays reflected by input prism 331 into optical system 370. Points closer to surface 503 of input prism 331 are in a vignetted region having reduced intensity in the image formed by optical system 370. A width V of the vignetted region is given by the height of the axial marginal ray on surface 503. This is just half the divergence of the ray bundle leaving an object point at a point where boundary ray 620 leaves prism 331. Aperture 444 of Fig. 4B blocks light in a vignetted region 446 of width V. In the optical system described in Tables 1 and 2, input prism 331 and output prism 333 set the limits for aperture 444 because the optical path length through half folding prism 332 is less than that through input prism 331 and output prism 333. Once width V of the vignetted region is known, the useable field is calculated geometrically. Fig. 4B shows the available field after L-shaped vignetted region 446 is removed. Trapezoidal aperture 444 has base length L which is a chord of circular boundary of lens 340. The maximum available chord L in the available field region is given by L=/2V ' where tanφ φ= arcsin I—j For the embodiment of Tables 1 and 2, chord length L is 41.7 mm. For a trapezoid height of 10 mm, the separation between scan lines, stripes, on a blank is 31.7 mm. There is a tradeoff between trapezoid height and scan separation, increasing the height of aperture 444 increase the amount of light through aperture 444 but decreases the separation between stripes. There is also a tradeoff between the numerical aperture and useable field size because vignetted field width V is proportional to the divergence of the rays from the object, which are focused by optical system 370. A system design could change configurations from a high resolution, smaller field size mode to a low resolution, large field size mode. By changing the diameter of an aperture stop (not shown) on mirror 350 and the size of the field stop on illuminator 110 simultaneously, resolution can be traded for field size. A larger aperture stop would be used with a small field stop and vice versa. The proportion of useable field area appears quite small for the Double Pass Dyson configuration. Two points should be kept in mind: first, because the optical path is folded twice, only one quarter of the circular area of lens 340 is available; and second, the requirement that the object and image planes are parallel and separated by more than the diameter of the primary mirror increases path length and the resultant divergence of the ray bundles. This second effect is common to known Wynne-Dyson optical systems. The advantages of the Double Pass Dyson approach over a roof prism design such as described in U.S. patent No. 4,171,870 to Burning et al. or a double Dyson configurations such as described in U.S. patent No. 5,298,939 to Swanson et al. are clear. A roof prism can cause multiple images near the center of the field if the roof angle is not precisely fabricated. A roof prism also increases the glass path length in getting the image past the primary mirror which typically reduces field size significantly. Inserting a field stop into the roof prism configuration would be difficult. The double Dyson approach can provide a large field but at the expense and complexity of building and aligning two lenses instead of one. Projection System with Magnification Correction Optics Fig. 7A shows a double pass Wynne-Dyson optical system 770 in accordance with another embodiment of this invention. Optical system 770 incorporates magnification adjusting optics associated with an input prism 731 and an output prism 733. The magnification adjusting optics includes two sets 710 and 720 of long radius lens elements. Each set 710 or 720 includes a plano-convex element 712 or 722 and a plano-concave element 714 or 724 which define a narrow (between about 0.1 mm and 5 mm) meniscus air gap 713 or 723. In optical system 770, plano-convex elements 712 and 722 are bonded to prisms 731 and 732 respectively, and plano-concave elements 714 and 724 are movable relative to plano-convex elements 712 and 722 to adjust the magnification of optical system 770. In an alternative embodiment, plano-concave elements 714 and 724 are bonded to prisms 731 and 732 respectively, and plano¬ convex elements 712 and 722 are movable. The radii of elements 712, 714, 722, and 724 are equal, and sets 710 and 720 introduce almost no power into optical system 770. The magnification adjusting optics has a magnification neutral position where both air gaps 713 and 723 are equal and the optical system is perfectly symmetric about the intermediate image plane in the center of folding prism 733. If both negative elements 714 and 724 are moved in the same direction one air gap 713 or 723 narrows, the other air gap 723 or 713 widens, and the magnification and image field size of optical system 770 changes slightly. A field stop 760 in a gap in the middle of folding prism 732 selects the portion of the intermediate image which forms a final image on blank 160. Fig. 4B shows an exemplary trapezoidal aperture 444 for small field scanning. Field stop 760 eases the requirement of accurately transferring the image of a field stop in illuminator 110 to the object plane (reticle 120) . The alignment of field stop 760 in folding prism 732 can be made with respect to lens 740 which is part of the same assembly and makes alignment of input prism 731 and lens 740 to illuminator 110 less critical. Magnification adjusting optics 710 and 720 and field stop 760 in the air gap in folding prism 732 are independent, and alternative embodiments of this invention include optical systems incorporating one or the other. In one embodiment, magnification adjusting elements 712, 714, 722, and 724 are quarter sections of a conventional circular element and aligned with input and output prisms 731 and 733 so that the optical axes of elements 712, 714, 722, and 724, after reflection by prisms 731 and 733, are coincident with an optical axis 775 of lens 740 and mirror 750. Figs. 7B and 7C show two perspective views of a portion of optical system 770 illustrating the alignment of quarter section elements 712 and 722. Aligning elements 712, 714, 722, and 724 with optical axis 775 preserves more of the optical system's symmetry but may have disadvantages in alignment and fabrication. For this alignment, the stationary point for magnification adjustment is along the optical axis. Alternatively, elements 712, 714, 722, and 724 can be conventional circular elements aligned so that after reflections, rays along an optical axis of elements 712, 714, 722, and 724 pass approximately through the center of aperture 760. However, exactly aligning elements 712, 714, 722, and 724 with the center of the trapezoidal aperture is unlikely, and some relative movement of the object and image move with respect to each can be expected during magnification adjustments. Accordingly, changing the magnification moves the image relative to the object, and reticle 110 and blank 160 must be aligned after magnification adjustment. Table 3 shows structural parameters of an embodiment of optical system 770 of Fig. 7A when elements 714 and 724 are in a magnification neutral position. Table 3 Surface Radius (mm ) Thickness (mm) Glass 801 oo 10.3763 (Object) Air 802 oo 7.000 LAKN7 803 1999.9997 1.000 Air 804 1999.9997 6.000 LAKN7 805 oo 112.0661 LAKN7 806 00 23.5396 KF6 807 -127.2866 143.5363 SF2 808 -281.3477 727.0806 Air 809 -1008.2385 -727.0806 Air 808 -281.3477 -143.5363 SF2 807 -127.2866 -23.5396 KF6 810 oo -100.1653 LAKN7 811 co 4.000 Air 812 co 0 (Intermediate image) Air Table 4 indicates performance and structural parameters of the embodiment of Table 3 when the axes of elements 712, 714, 722, and 724 are aligned with axis 775. Analysis of a system where the axes of elements 712, 714, 722, and 724 is offset from axis 775 provides similar performance. Table 4 Field radius 50 mm Maximum useable field width 45 mm Numerical aperture 0.18 Wavelength correction 436 & 405 nm Magnification range +/- 100 ppm Maximum OPD 0.12 lambda, 0.08 lambda at IX mag. Field flatness 2.4 microns Telecentricity 2.3 R Primary mirror clearance 15.6 mm Working distance 10.4 mm The parameters of Tables 3 and 4 are defined in the same way as the parameters of Tables 1 and 2 above. Fig. 8A shows a ray trace diagram for optical system 770 from an object plane 801 to an intermediate image plane 812 in the middle of folding prism 732, the plane of symmetry for optical system 770. Fig. 8B shows a ray trace diagram from intermediate image plane 812 to a final image plane 819. The 1 mm air gap 713 between surface 803 and surface 804 is increased (decreased) while air space 723 is decreased (increased) in an equal amount to adjust the magnification of optical system 770 away from unity. Changes of 0.158 mm in air gaps 713 and 723 cause a 100 ppm magnification change. Since very little movement, less than 1 mm, is required for magnification adjustment, movable element 714 (and element 724) can be mounted on flexure bearings and moved by a stepper motor micropositioner, such as those available from Melles Griot, Inc. of Irvine, California. The amount of motion required for a given magnification change in this embodiment can be adjusted by varying the power of the four magnification elements. The optical system of Table 2 is similar to the optical system of Table 4, but there are some notable differences. The numerical aperture in the magnification correcting lens has been reduced from 0.2 to 0.18. This reduces the vignetting, giving a larger useable field size of 45 mm. The smaller N.A. also reduces the diameter of mirror from 269 mm to 242 mm allowing for over 15 mm of clearance to image plane 819. The OPDs in the unity magnification condition are 0.08 λ, giving additional aberration budget for magnification adjustments. For a 10-mm high trapezoid, the scan separation becomes 35 mm; for a 5 mm high trapezoid, scan separation becomes 40 mm. The embodiment of Tables 3 and 4 was optimized at the unity magnification condition only: an optimization over all adjusted magnifications would result in smaller maximum OPDs. The introduction of an air gap between surfaces 811 and 813 inside folding prism 732 can cause additional vignetting beyond what is present from input and output prisms 731 and 732. This can be prevented by making the two halves of folding prism 732 large enough to accommodate the field size and the divergence of the image cone through them. The additional glass length required by the optical design can be made up by cementing a block 732C of glass to the base of two prism halves 732A and 732B as shown in Fig. 9. For embodiment of Table 3, the 100.1653 mm of LAKN7 glass path length can be divided into 61 mm for the prism halve 732A (or 732B) and 39.1653 mm for the base 732C. When this is done, the limiting vignetting is caused by input and output prisms 731 and 733. Fig. 10 shows an embodiment of magnification adjusting optics for a double pass Wynne-Dyson optical system wherein a folding prism 1000 contains two meniscus air gaps 1025 and 1035. Folding prism 1000 contains a movable convex element 1030 between two plano-concave elements 1020 and 1040 which are bonded to inside surfaces of portions 1010 and 1050 of folding prism 1000, and moving symmetric element 1030 adjusts magnification. Movable element 1030 is equivalent to elements 712 and 722 (Fig. 7A) joined to form a symmetric convex element, and elements 1020 and 1040 are equivalent to elements 714 and 724 (Fig. 7A) . An alternative folding prism with magnification adjusting optics has a movable symmetric concave element equivalent to elements 714 and 724 (Fig. 7A) joined, and plano-concave elements equivalent to elements 712 and 722 (Fig. 7A) bonded to inside walls of the folding prism. Placing magnification adjusting optics in folding prism 1000 has disadvantages. It requires a large cavity in folding prism 1000 to accommodate three elements 1020, 1030, and 1040 which provides more opportunity for vignetting. The intermediate image plane lies inside symmetric element 1030 which must be thick enough to keep its surface and any dust particles on it out of focus. Further, the intermediate image now moves inside element 1030, and there is no opportunity to insert a field stop at that location. The optical systems disclosed herein can be scaled in size by making the each element larger to obtain larger field sizes. However, fabrication difficulty and expense are important issues at sizes not too much larger than about 1 meter diameter of the described embodiments. Increasing the N.A. of these systems is more difficult both from the vignetting and aberration standpoints. The optimum size for the trapezoidal height, which strongly affects the average width and thus the scan separation, must be addressed in conjunction with the illuminator design. The extension of this approach to use i-line illumination should be straightforward despite the more limited glass selection. System with Relative Motion to Correct Magnification For small field scanning lithography, relative motion of the reticle and the blank may be used in addition to optical magnification adjustment to correct for compaction (or expansion) of a blank relative to the reticle. In particular, when the blank shrinks to a size smaller than the reticle, the magnification of the optical system should be decrease to less than one, i.e. to the ratio of the reticle's size to the blank's size, and scanning should expose the reduced area of the blank, not an area the size of the reticle. The relative motion of the reticle and blank can compensate for the reticle and blank having different sizes. For example, exposing a stripe on the blank is often performed by moving the illuminator and the optical system along a scanning direction relative to the reticle and the blank. Continuously moving the blank in the scanning direction reduces the motion of the illuminator and optical system relative to the blank. Relative motion of the reticle and blank is also advantageous to compensate for length differences along an indexing direction perpendicular to the exposed stripes. Thus to provide full magnification correction in a small field scanning system, a combination of optical magnification correction and relative reticle-blank movement is advantageous. The relative motion between the blank and the reticle may be on the part of either. A slight relative velocity is imparted to either the reticle or the blank as the two are being scanned, for instance by means of a secondary stage which moves the reticle or blank relative to the other. The amount of relative motion is proportional to the amount of magnification correction required. Hence, any alignment error in the scan direction due to blank compaction or expansion can be corrected. The relative motion magnification correction is independent of the optical magnification adjustment and each may be used independently. Use of the relative motion magnification correction can selectively correct for differences in one direction. For example, one could adjust the separation of each scan stripe by a distance which divides the total magnification correction needed among all of the stripes in the indexing direction. Without optical magnification correction, some residual uncorrected misalignment remains, i.e. the 10 to 100 parts per million of the blank compaction across the diameter of the scan field, which is typically 30 to 40 mm. Many systems for moving a reticle relative a blank are possible, and the embodiment disclosed herein of a secondary stage for the reticle or blank moving relative to the stage holding the other of the reticle or blank is merely one embodiment. Typically, relative motion is provided by a microstepper or other precision motor driving the secondary stage under control of a conventional control mechanism receiving feedback from the reticle alignment system. The magnification correction schemes described here could be adapted to the other optical configurations that have been discussed: roof prism, double Dyson, conventional Wynne-Dyson, and even telecentric IX refractive optics. Although the present invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the description is only an example of the invention's application and should not be taken as a limitation. Many other embodiments of the invention are possible. For example, the magni ication adjusting optics and/or magnification correction through relative motion of the blank and reticle in accordance with the invention may be employed in variety of projection systems including systems with Wynne-Dyson optics and added elements to remove the image reversal, Wynne-Dyson optics with opposing motion scanning, double pass Wynne-Dyson optics, and other projection optics. The magnification adjusting optics can be attached to input and output prisms or can be internal to the projection optics. Various other adaptations and combinations of features of the embodiments disclosed will be apparent to those skilled in the art and are within the scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims.

Claims: We claim: 1. A projection lens assembly, comprising: projection optics; and magnification adjusting optics, wherein the magnification optics comprises: a first lens element having a convex surface; a second lens element having a concave surface disposed adjacent to the convex surface of the first lens element to define a first gap between the first and the second lens elements, wherein the concave surface has a radius of curvature equal to that of the convex surface; and means for moving the first lens element relative to the second lens element to change the first gap. 2. The projection assembly of Claim 1, wherein: the second lens element has a second concave surface; the magnification adjusting optics further comprises a third lens element having a convex surface disposed adjacent to the second concave surface of the second lens element to define a second gap, wherein the convex surface of the second lens element has a radius of curvature equal to that of the second concave surface of the second lens element; and the means for moving moves the second lens element relative to the third lens element so that second gap narrows as the first gap widens. 3. The projection assembly of Claim 1, wherein: the first lens element has a second convex surface; the magnification adjusting optics further comprises a third lens element having a concave surface adjacent to the second convex surface of the first lens element to define a second gap; the concave surface of the third lens element has a radius of curvature equal to that of the second convex surface of the first lens element; and the means for moving moves the first lens element relative to the third lens element so that second gap narrows as the first gap widens. 4. The projection assembly of Claim 1, wherein the magnification adjusting optics further comprises: a third lens element having a convex surface; a fourth lens element having a concave surface disposed adjacent to the convex surface of the third lens element to define a second gap between the third and the fourth lens elements, wherein the concave surface of the fourth lens element has a radius of curvature equal to that of the convex surface of the third lens element; and means for moving the third lens element relative to the fourth lens element to change the second gap. 5. The projection assembly of Claim 4, wherein: the first and second lens elements are positioned so that light passes through the first and second lens elements before entering the projection optics; and the first and second lens elements are positioned so that light from the projection optics passes through the third and fourth lens elements. 6. The projection assembly of Claim 1, wherein the radius of curvature to the convex surface of the first lens element is greater than 50 mm. 7. The projection assembly of Claim 1, wherein the projection optics comprises a Wynne-Dyson optical system. 8. The projection assembly of Claim 7, wherein the Wynne-Dyson optical system further comprises a roof prism system. 9. The projection assembly of Claim l, wherein the projection optics comprises a double pass Wynne- Dyson optical system. 10. A one-to-one projection lens assembly, comprising: at least two prisms, an input prism having an exterior surface on which an image is incident and an output prism having an exterior surface from which the image is projected; and magnification adjusting optics associated with each of the input and output prisms. 11. The projection lens of Claim 10, further comprising a reflective element spaced apart from each of the two prisms and located for reflecting an image from the input prism back to the output prism. 12. The projection lens assembly of Claim 11, further comprising a folding prism arranged adjacent to both the input and output prisms. 13. The projection lens assembly of Claim 10, wherein the magnification adjusting optics includes at least two low power lens elements located adjacent exterior surfaces of each of the input and output prisms. 14. The projection lens assembly of Claim 11, wherein the at least two lens elements located adjacent the exterior surface of the input prism are respectively a plano-convex lens element and a plano¬ concave lens element, the concave and convex surfaces being adjacent one to another. 15. The projection lens assembly of Claim 14, the concave and convex surfaces being of approximately equal radius, and further comprising a gap between the concave and convex surfaces. 16. The projection lens assembly of Claim 15, further comprising a magnification adjustment mechanism connected to at least one of the two lens elements, thereby moving one of the two lens elements relative to the other and changing the size of the gap. 17. The projection lens assembly of Claim 15, the gap being about 1 mm maximum. 18. The projection lens assembly of Claim 10, wherein the lens assembly defines a cavity, and further comprising a field stop located in the cavity. 19. The projection lens assembly of Claim 10, further comprising a folding prism and wherein the folding prism defines a cavity, and further comprising a field stop located in the cavity. 20. The projection lens assembly of Claim 10, further comprising a folding prism and wherein the folding prism defines a cavity and wherein the magnification adjusting optics are located in the cavity. 21. The projection lens assembly of Claim 20, wherein the magnification adjusting optics includes three lens elements which are respectively a double concave element located between two plano-convex elements. 22. The projection lens assembly of Claim 20, wherein the magnification adjusting optics includes three lens elements which are respectively a double convex element located between two plano-concave elements. 23. The projection lens assembly of Claim 20, wherein the magnification adjusting optics includes at least three lens elements of low optical power spaced apart to define two gaps, wherein adjacent surfaces of each of the three elements are of approximately the same radius. 24. The projection lens assembly of Claim 23, further comprising a magnification adjustment mechanism connected to the magnification adjusting optics, thereby altering a width of the two gaps. 25. The projection lens assembly of Claim 23, wherein the lens elements are each quarter sections in outside diameter and at least one lens element is bonded to the exterior surfaces of respectively the input and output prisms, the optical axis of each of the quarter sections being coincident with an optical axis of the lens assembly. 26. The projection lens assembly of Claim 23, wherein the lens elements each have an optical axis offset from an optical axis of other portions of the lens assembly. 27. A method for scanning a field with an image from a one-to-one projection lens, comprising the steps of: providing a first optical magnification correction to an image incident on the projection lens; passing the magnification corrected image through at least a portion of the lens; providing a second optical magnification correction to the image after the step of passing; and scanning the field with the image having the second magnification correction. 28. The method of Claim 27, further comprising the step of adjusting the magnification while scanning the field. 29. A method for scanning a field with an image from a one-to-one projection lens, comprising: inputting the image to the projection lens; moving a magnification adjusting lens element in the projection lens, thereby altering a magnification correction to the image in the projection lens; and scanning the field with the corrected image. 30. A method for small field scanning an image onto a blank comprising the steps of: passing illuminating light through a reticle; then, passing the light through a projection lens; then scanning the light from the projection lens onto a blank in a scanning pattern having a plurality of scan stripes; imparting a relative velocity between the reticle and the blank in the direction of the scanning pattern, thereby forming an image on the blank, a magnification correction to the image being determined by the relative velocity; and then severing the blank into multiple portions, each portion including a part of the image formed on the blank, and wherein each part of the image formed on one blank portion was projected onto the blank in multiple scan stripes. 31. The method of Claim 30, wherein the magnification correction is in the range of zero to 100 parts per million. 32. The method of Claim 30, wherein the reticle and blank are mounted on respective stages, and the step of imparting includes moving one of the stages relative to the other stage. 33. The method of Claim 30, wherein the step of imparting includes varying the relative velocity, thereby varying the magnification correction while scanning the light. 34. The method of Claim 30, further comprising the step of optically adjusting a magnification of the image in the projection lens. 35. A lithographic scanning apparatus for small field scanning of a blank, comprising; an illumination source; a reticle support adjacent to the illumination source; a blank support capable of supporting . blank at least 500 mm by 500 mm in size; a projection lens intermediate the reticle support and the blank support; and a magnification adjustment mechanism connected to the reticle support and the blank support, thereby moving the reticle support relative to the blank support in a direction of scanning of the blank.

Inventors: ALLEN PAUL C, VOISIN RONALD D, ALLEN, PAUL, C., VOISIN, RONALD, D.
Applicants: ETEC SYSTEMS INC, ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.
Application year: 1996
Main classification: G03F7
IPC codes: G02B13, G02B15, G02B17, G03F7, H01L21