DEHALOGENATION OF HALOGENATED HYDROCARBONS IN AQUEOUS COMPOSITIONS

Abstract: A method for dehalogenation of aqueous compositions contaminated with halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons is provided which comprises contacting an aqueous composition with an amount of a mixed metal composition effective to dehalogenate the halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons at a temperature of at least 10 DEG C, wherein the mixed metal composition comprises a second metal selected from the group consisting of copper, cobalt, nickel, molybdenum, bismuth, tin, lead, silver, chromium, palladium, platinum and gold deposited on an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal and wherein the amount of second metal in the mixed metal composition is an amount effective to increase the dehalogenation rate compared to use of iron alone, and the surface of the mixed metal composition has exposed iron metal.

Description: DEHALOGENATION OF HALOGENATED HYDROCARBONS IN AQUEOUS COMPOSITIONS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a method for the dehalogenation of halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons in aqueous compositions. In one aspect, this invention relates to a method utilizing a mixed metal composition to dehalogenate halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons in an aqueous composition. In another aspect, this invention relates to a method of contacting a mixed metal composition prepared by contacting a metal or a soluble metal salt with an anchor metal to deposit the metal on an anchor metal with a halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon contaminated aqueous composition to dehalogenate the halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon. In a further aspect, this invention is utilized in situ to dehalogenate halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons in groundwater. Halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons, particularly chlorinated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons such as carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene, have been widely used as chemical intermediates, solvents for dry cleaning of clothing, degreasing, and a variety of other applications. Halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons are very stable and persistent in the environment, and are relatively toxic at low levels. Over the years, halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons have been accumulating in the environment, particularly in groundwater. As a result, pollution of water by chlorinated hydrocarbons has become an important environmental problem and contaminated groundwater represent a large portion of environmental action plans throughout the world. It is known that chlorinated compounds can be degraded by reductive dechlorination, i.e. replacement of chlorine substituents by hydrogen. Evidence indicates that many of the chlorinated solvents are degraded under anaerobic conditions in sediments and in systems simulating anaerobic wastewater treatment. Current theory suggests that some of these anaerobic dechlorinations are not strictly biological in nature, but are catalyzed by metallic iron. While the use of iron in the dechlorination affords little environmental threat, its use suffers from certain problems. Recently, Gillham and O'Hannesin disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,266,213, a method for cleaning halogenated contaminants from groundwater. The process involves feeding contaminated groundwater through a trench containing a metal such as iron, under strict exclusion of oxygen, and over a lengthy period of time. Disadvantages of this system include the fact that large amounts of iron and substantial periods of time are needed for completion of the reactions. In U.S. Patents No. 4,219,419 and 4,382,865 (Sweeny), there is disclosed a system for treating the effluent created during the production of halogenated pesticides. In that process, the effluent water stream containing the halogenated waste material is required to be buffered to near neutral pH prior to passing the waste stream over a metal couple. There is a need for an enhanced method for dehalogenating aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons in contaminated aqueous solutions so as to diminish the amount of metallic iron needed to complete the dehalogenation. There is also a need for a dehalogenation method where the rate of dehalogenation is increased and innocuous reaction products are generated. It has now been found that a mixed metal composition prepared by contacting a metal or a soluble metal salt with an anchor metal to deposit the metal on an anchor metal while controlling the portion of the surface area of the anchor metal which has a second metal deposited thereon solves the above-described problems. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the invention to provide an improved method for dehalogenating halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons in aqueous compositions. It is a further object of the invention to provide a memod for detoxifying groundwater contaminated with halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons, particularly chlorinated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons. It is yet a further object of the invention to provide a method for dehalogenating halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons in groundwater which can be used in situ, particularly in conjunction with in situ soil and groundwater remediation processes. According to the invention, a method for dehalogenation of aqueous compositions contaminated with halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons is provided which comprises contacting the aqueous composition with an amount of a mixed metal composition effective to dehalogenate the halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons at a temperature of at least 10 'C, wherein the mixed metal composition comprises a second metal deposited on an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal and wherein the amount of second metal in the mixed metal composition is an amount effective to increase the dehalogenation rate compared to use of iron alone, and the surface of the mixed metal composition has exposed iron metal. In one embodiment, the mixed metal composition is prepared by contacting an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal with a soluble metal salt in die presence of a liquid comprising water for a time sufficient to deposit metal derived from the soluble metal salt on the anchor metal wherein the metal in the soluble salt is copper, nickel, molybdenum, tin, lead, silver, chromium, palladium, platinum or gold. In another embodiment, the mixed metal composition is prepared by contacting an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal with a second metal selected from the group consisting of copper and nickel in the presence of a liquid comprising water for a time sufficient to deposit die second metal on the anchor metal. In a further embodiment, die mixed metal composition is prepared by contacting an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal with a nonaqueous electroless plating solution comprising a soluble metal halide salt complex and a suitable solvent for a time sufficient to deposit metal derived from the soluble metal salt on me anchor metal wherein the metal in the soluble salt is cobalt, copper, nickel, bismuth or lead, and recovering the mixed metal composition. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION A first embodiment of die invention relates to a memod for dehalogenation of aqueous compositions contaminated with halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons comprising contacting an aqueous composition with an amount of a mixed metal composition effective to dehalogenate die halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons at a temperature of at least 10 * C, wherein the mixed metal composition comprises a second metal selected from die group consisting of copper, cobalt, nickel, molybdenum, bismuth, tin, lead, silver, chromium, palladium, platinum and gold deposited on an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal and wherein the amount of second metal in die mixed metal composition is an amount effective to increase the dehalogenation rate compared to use of iron alone, and die surface of the mixed metal composition has exposed iron metal. A second embodiment of die invention relates to a mediod for dehalogenation of aqueous compositions contaminated wim halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons comprising: (a) contacting an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal with a soluble metal salt in the presence of a liquid comprising water for a time sufficient to deposit metal derived from the soluble metal salt on the anchor metal to produce a mixed metal composition wherein the amount of metal derived from die soluble metal salt in the mixed metal composition is an amount effective to increase the dehalogenation rate compared to use of iron alone, and d e surface of die mixed metal composition has exposed iron metal, and wherein the metal in die soluble salt is copper, nickel, molybdenum, tin, lead, silver, chromium, palladium, platinum or gold, and (b) contacting the aqueous composition with an amount of me mixed metal composition effective to dehalogenate die halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons at a temperature of at least 10 "C. A third embodiment of the invention relates to a me od for dehalogenation of aqueous compositions contaminated wid halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons comprising: (a) contacting an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal with a second metal selected from the group consisting of copper and nickel in the presence of a liquid comprising water for a time sufficient to deposit die second metal on the anchor metal to produce a mixed metal composition wherein the amount of the second metal in the mixed metal composition is an amount effective to increase the dehalogenation rate compared to use of iron alone and die surface of the mixed metal composition has exposed iron metal, and wherein the amount of die second metal charged to form the mixed metal composition is about 0.08 weight percent to about 50 weight percent of die total amount of the second metal and the anchor metal charged; and (b) contacting die aqueous composition with an amount of die mixed metal composition effective to dehalogenate die halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons at a temperature of at least 10 "C. In die second and third embodiments described above, steps (a) and (b) can optionally be performed simultaneously. Therefore, the mixed metal composition can be formed by contacting die anchor metal widi the second metal in die presence of a liquid comprising water which is the contaminated aqueous composition. A fourth embodiment of die invention relates to a me od for dehalogenation of aqueous compositions contaminated wim halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons comprising: (a) contacting an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal with a nonaqueous electroless plating solution comprising a soluble metal halide salt complex and a suitable solvent for a time sufficient to deposit metal derived from the soluble metal halide salt on die anchor metal to produce a mixed metal composition wherein the amount of metal derived from the soluble metal halide salt in the mixed metal composition is an amount effective to increase the dehalogenation rate compared to use of iron alone, and die surface of the mixed metal composition has exposed iron metal, and wherein the metal in the soluble salt is cobalt, copper, nickel, bismuth or lead, (b) recovering the mixed metal composition, and (c) contacting the aqueous composition with an amount of the mixed metal composition effective to dehalogenate die halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons at a temperature of at least 10 * C. The rate of dehalogenation will depend on several factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to, die second metal used, die amount of second metal in die mixed metal composition, the relative exposed surface areas of die second metal and iron, the type of iron, temperature, and the halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon to be dehalogenated. The dehalogenation rate achievable by utilizing die mixed metal composition of die present invention is unexpectedly increased compared to die use of iron alone. Specifically, the increase in rate compared to die use of iron alone can be calculated and conveniently expressed using a Rate Enhancement Factor (REF) wherein REF " tl/2,mixed metal composition)'tl/2,Fe or KH i* ~ "-m\xeά metal composition " "-Fez' "mixe metal composition* In die above formulas, t 1/2 is the half-life, i.e. the time required for half of the halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon in the aqueous composition to be dehalogenated, and k is die dehalogenation rate constant wherein t m = ln(2)/k. The half-life or rate constant using die mixed metal composition of me invention can be compared to the half-life or rate constant using iron metal alone and an improvement in dehalogenation rate can be readily determined. The Rate Enhancement Factor ieoretically can vary from 0 to 1 widi 0 representing no improvement and 1 representing an infinite improvement in rate. This compares directly to the dehalogenation rate enhancement calculated as a ratio of k m i xed met ai k Fe θr t 1/2>Fe /t 1/2 mixed metal wherein 1 corresponds to a REF of 0, and 100 corresponds to a REF of 0.99. The use of die mixed metal composition of the invention results in a REF of at least about 0.15 and up to about 0.99. It is preferred diat the mixed metal composition be selected according to die factors of the second metal used, me amount of second metal in die mixed metal composition, the relative exposed surface areas of the second metal and iron, and die type of iron such diat use of die mixed metal composition of d e invention results in a REF of at least about 0.2 and up to about 0.96, more preferably at least about 0.35 and up to about 0.86, compared to die use of iron alone. The invention can be practiced in different settings. The invention can be practiced ex situ by various mediods, including but not limited to, batch processing or passing die contaminated solution dirough a column. In batch processing die contaminated aqueous composition is treated in a separate container by admixing d e reagents widi die contaminated solution. In column treatment, die mixed metal composition is packed as a reactive medium in die column while the contaminated solution is passed dirough the column. Additionally, die me iod of this invention can be practiced in situ widiout the removal of die contaminated water from the ground, pond or stream. Contaminants can be degraded in place because die reaction products are environmentally acceptable and need not be removed. In situ treatment is currently preferred for treating contaminated soil or groundwater because the contaminated soil or groundwater does not require handling. The method of d is invention is particularly applicable in conjunction widi die in situ remediation process disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,398,756 (Brodsky and Ho), which is incorporated by reference herein. In one aspect of U.S. Patent No. 5,398,756, material for treating contaminants is introduced into liquid permeable regions of a contaminated soil region to form treating zones and die contaminant is caused to flow through the treating zones via electroosmosis. The method of die invention can also be practiced in situ utilizing a permeable reaction wall as disclosed in O'Hannesin and Gillham, "A Permeable Reaction Wall for In Situ Degradation of Halogenated Organic Compounds", paper presented at die 45dι Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Toronto, Canada, October 25-28, 1992 and commercially available as the envirometal process from envirometal technologies inc. The permeable reaction wall is installed across die flow path of a contaminant plume, allowing the plume to passively move through the wall. The halogenated hydrocarbons are degraded by reaction widi the mixed metal composition incorporated in die permeable areas or gates of me permeable reaction wall. In addition, diis technique can be used in conjunction widi die process of U.S. Patent No. 5,398,7 56 for low permeability soils. The halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons of die invention can contain a halogen selected from die group consisting of chlorine, bromine, fluorine and mixtures thereof. By mixtures diereof is meant halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons which contain more than one type of halogen, e.g. chlorine and bromine. The currendy preferred halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons for use in the invention are those wherein the halogen is selected from d e group consisting of chlorine, bromine and mixtures thereof. The most preferred halogenated hydrocarbons for use in the invention are halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons, specifically chloroaliphatics, bromoaliphatics and bromo,chloroaliphatics. It is also preferred, regardless of die specific halogen, d at the aliphatic hydrocarbon have 1 to 18 carbon atoms, preferably 1 to 12 carbon atoms, and die alicyclic hydrocarbons have 3 to 12 carbon atoms, preferably 5 to 8 carbon atoms. Examples of suitable halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons for treatment in the invention include, but are not limited to, carbon tetrachloride, 1,1-dichloroedιane, trichloroediene, dibromochloromemane, cis-l,3-dichloro-propene, tetrachloroethene, bromomediane, chloroform, 1,2-dichloropropane, bromodichloromethane, cis-l,2-dichloroethene, trans- 1,3-dichloropropene, 1,1,1-trichloroedιane, vinyl chloride, 1,1-dichloroedιene, 1,1,2-trichloroethane, bromoform, trans-l,2-dichloroethene, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, chloroethane, 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobutane, 1,2-dichlorocyclohexane, chlorocyclobutane, chlorocyclohexane, chlorocyclopentane, bromocyclopropane, bromocycloheptane, 1-chloro-l-cyclopentene and 3-bromocyclohexene. The anchor metal of die invention consists essentially of iron metal. The anchor metal can be high purity iron metal, e.g. 99.999% purity, or a low carbon iron diat contains a small amount, e.g. less than 1-2 weight percent, of other metal impurities diat are incorporated widiin the iron particle and not readily or uniformly available at die surface of the iron particle. The major metal impurities in such an iron are chromium, manganese, nickel and copper. In die embodiment where die metal deposited on die anchor metal is in die form of the metal, the metal is selected from the group consisting of copper and nickel. The currently preferred metal is copper for reasons of economics and performance. In the embodiment where die metal deposited on me anchor metal is in die form of a soluble metal salt, die metal is selected from the group consisting of copper, nickel, molybdenum, tin, lead, silver, chromium, palladium, platinum and gold, preferably copper, nickel, tin and silver, more preferably copper, nickel and tin, and most preferably copper. Examples of suitable soluble metal salts include, but are not limited to, copper sulfate, copper chloride, copper nitrate, nickel sulfate, nickel chloride, silver sulfate, gold trichloride, stannous sulfate, stannous chloride, lead chloride, lead acetate, lead chlorate, lead nitrate, molybdenum trioxide, chromous chloride, palladium chloride and platinum sulfate. The currently preferred soluble metal salt is copper sulfate due to its excellent performance. When the deposition of d e second metal on die anchor metal is conducted in an aqueous solution, die soluble metal salts can optionally be used in conjunction with any suitable complexing agent to enhance the deposition of die second metal on the anchor metal. Examples of suitable complexing agent include, but are not limited to, die salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), particularly the sodium salts of EDTA. In die embodiment where the metal deposited on die anchor metal is in the form of a soluble metal halide salt complex and die electroless deposition of die metal from the soluble metal halide salt complex on die anchor metal is conducted in a nonaqueous solution, die metal is selected from the group consisting of cobalt, copper, nickel, bismudi and lead, preferably cobalt, copper and nickel, and more preferably cobalt and copper. When the deposition of die metal from the soluble metal salt complex on die anchor metal is conducted in a nonaqueous solution, the metal halide salt is complexed widi a basic nitrogen compound capable of forming a complex widi die metal. The basic nitrogen compound can be added to die metal halide salt to form the complex as the hydrochloride of a nitrogen-containing base or as a mixture of the nitrogen-containing base and hydrochloric acid. Examples of nitrogen containing bases include inorganic bases such as hydrazine, hydroxylamine and ammonia, organic bases such as primary, secondary or tertiary amines and nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds, carboxylic acid amides, urea derivatives, e.g. N,N'-dimethyl urea, and basic phosphorus compounds, e.g. hexamethylphosphoric acid triamide. Examples of basic nitrogen compounds used as complexing agents include, but are not limited to, NH 4 C1, H 3 CNH 2 ΗC1, H 3 CNHΗC1, morpholine hydrochloride, and pyridine hydrochloride. Examples of suitable metal halide salts include, but are not limited to, copper chloride, nickel chloride, cobaltous chloride, lead chloride and bismuth chloride. The currently preferred metal halide salts are cobaltous chloride and copper chloride. The solvent used to prepare the nonaqueous solution of die soluble metal halide salt complex is any organic solvent capable of dissolving the metal halide salt complex. Examples of suitable polar, non-aqueous solvents are dimethylformamide, acetamide, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, cyclohexanone, dimethylsulf oxide, tetrahydrofuran, and mixtures thereof. The currently preferred organic solvent is dimethylsulfoxide. The formation of the soluble metal halide salt complex and die electroless plating of die soluble metal halide salt complex on iron is described in Canadian Patent No. 1,209,412 (Hans-Georg Schnering et. al.). The mixed metal composition of die invention comprises a second metal having a more positive reduction potential dian diat of metallic iron deposited on die surface of an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal. The second metal is selected from the group consisting of copper, cobalt, nickel, molybdenum, bismudi, tin, lead, silver, chromium, palladium, platinum and gold. The amount of die second metal in die mixed metal composition is an amount effective to increase d e dehalogenation rate compared to use of iron alone and die surface of die mixed metal composition has exposed iron metal. The amount of the second metal in die mixed metal composition can be conveniently expressed as a weight percent of die total amount of metal in die mixed metal composition. Typically, die weight percent of d e second metal in die mixed metal composition will be from about 0.08 weight percent to about 10 weight percent, preferably about 0.12 weight percent to about 5 weight percent, and most preferably about 0.14 weight percent to about 1 weight percent. When the second metal is charged as die metal, die amount of the second metal charged to form the mixed metal composition is based on die total amount of the second metal and me anchor metal charged and is about 0.08 weight percent to about 50 weight percent, preferably about 0.5 weight percent to about 50 weight percent, and most preferably about 1 weight percent to about 10 weight percent, such as about 5 weight percent. It is important in die mediod of die invention mat die amount of me second metal on the surface of the anchor metal be controlled, i.e. diat die percentage of the surface area of the anchor metal that is covered by deposited second metal be controlled. The surface of the mixed metal composition of the invention is required to have exposed iron metal. The amount of surface area covered by d e second metal will effect the rate of dehalogenation achievable by die mixed metal composition of the invention, i.e. the ratio of surface area of second metal to exposed surface area of iron will effect the rate of dehalogenation. Therefore, in conjunction with die amount of second metal in die mixed metal composition, the percentage of the surface area of the mixed metal composition which is the second metal is controlled to achieve an increase in dehalogenation rate compared to die use of iron metal alone. The dehalogenation reaction is readily carried out under ambient temperature, although temperatures as low as 10 * C can be utilized. When temperatures lower than ambient temperature are used, die reaction rate, i.e. dehalogenation rate, is slower. When temperatures above ambient temperature are employed, such as temperatures up to about 350 * C, the reaction rate is generally faster. When the dehalogenation reaction is conducted in situ , the upper limit of temperature will generally be about 70 * C. EXAMPLES Example 1 Materials List - Mixed Metal Experiments. High purity iron (99.999%) obtained from Aesar Mallinckrodt iron 100 mesh obtained from Mallinckrodt Chemical, Inc. Stannous Chloride purchased from Mallinckrodt Chemical, Inc. Copper Metal electrolytic dust obtained from Fisher Scientific Nickel reduced powder obtained from Fisher Scientific Magnesium metal (40-80 mesh) obtained from Fisher Scientific Tin powder certified obtained from Fisher Scientific Zinc granular 30 mesh obtained from Fisher Scientific Cobalt powder obtained from Fisher Scientific Trichloroethylene (99+ %) obtained from Aldrich Chemical Company 12 mL National Scientific Company vials with Teflon ® /silicone septum obtained from Fisher Scientific Tube Rotator obtained from Scientific Equipment Products Experimental A Batch experimental approach was used in die mixed metal studies. Initially, Aesar pure iron (lg) was weighed into eight 12 mL vials equipped widi Teflon ® faced septa. The odier metal (tin, copper, zinc etc.) was dien weighed into die appropriate vial. These weights were held constant at 0.05 g per other metal. A water solution was then prepared by combining 250 mL water and 50 μL 88% formic acid. 10 mL of diis water was then pipetted into each vial. Each vial was then spiked, subsurface with 0.5 μL Trichloroethylene (TCE) widi a 5 μL Hamilton syringe. Immediately after spiking, die vials were capped. Vials were dien placed on a tube rotator at 18 RPM. A reagent blank also containing 1 g Aesar iron and no TCE and a simulated spike containing die reagent water and TCE was also placed on the rotator. The experiment was started and die vials were sampled periodically over die approximate 6.26 days of die experiment by removing 100 μL of the solution widi a repeater pipette and placing it directly into 10 mL of hexane. After sampling the group of sample vials, the vials were placed back onto die sample rotator until the next sampling period. In each batch experiment, a set of samples were run so relative comparisons could be made widiin a set. The samples consisted of a comparative sample vial widi Fe metal for which the comparison was to be made at a certain mass, a control sample vial containing TCE but no metals, and die mixed metal samples. Since TCE has a relatively large partial pressure in water, all rates were determined relative to die vial containing TCE and no metal. This vial is referred to as die simulated spiked sample. Each point was then plotted relative to the loss of TCE in the control. As such, die measured concentration of a reaction was divided by die measured concentration in the simulated spike to correct for volatility losses for each sampling time. C 0 can be defined as die initial concentration determined for a reaction mixture corrected for volatility losses at each sampling time. C,/C 0 is die normalized concentration of the reaction versus the simulated spiked sample, where Ci is the measured concentration of die reaction mixture. The simulated spiked sample was sampled each time the reaction mixtures were sampled and diis correction was made for each reaction mixture data point. The control was assumed to have die same loss during sampling as the samples. The mass of the metal was always maintained die same within a set of experiments, since die rates depend on surface area and dierefore the mass used such diat die comparisons of rate increases are made against a control of Fe having d e same mass. Analytical procedures The analysis for TCE was typically carried out on a gas chromatograph equipped widi an electron capture detector (GC/EC). This is a highly sensitive technique for determination of chlorinated compounds. The gas chromatograph was an HP 5890 equipped wim a 30 meter x 0.53 mm Supelco 2 5320 column. The temperature program was; initial temperature was 40 C held for 4 minutes followed by an increase to 65 C at a rate of 10 degrees per minute followed by an increase to 200 C at a rate of 30 degree per minute. The output of the GC/EC was controlled by a Dionex data system. Quantitation was carried out against a standard curve. Results The In C,/C 0 was plotted vs time. The plots indicated if die rate was a pseudo first order reaction. All d e reactions were pseudo first order and dierefore comparisons based on pseudo first order half lives could be made. This was accomplished by fitting die data widi a linear least squares fit and obtaining d e rate constant k for the mixed metal. The half-lives (t 1/2 ) were calculated from t 1/2 = ln(2)/k. Table I shows die half-lives calculated by diis approach as well as the improvement in dehalogenation rates. The results in Table I indicate mat the addition of copper decreases die time to dechlorinate half of the TCE to 10 hours from 69 hours observed for pure Fe. Table I also indicates diat for die dechlorination of TCE die decrease in half-life widi die addition of Cu metal is independent of die amount of metal added over die range tested, i.e. 0.5 % by weight of Cu on Fe yields widiin experimental error the same half-life as mixtures of Fe and Cu containing 25 % and 50 % Cu. The results in Table I also demonstrate mat die presence of Ni metal decreases die half-life of die loss of TCE. That Cu and Ni increase the rate suggests that any metal that has a more positive reduction potential tiian iron will increase die rate of loss of halogenated hydrocarbons such as TCE. This observation holds only if die metals with more positive potentials can plate on the iron or dirough a mechanical mechanism be placed in contact with the iron. The process of plating can occur through die dissolution of die metal which immediately plates on die surface of the iron because of die positive reduction potential widi respect to iron. This was seen widi die Cu and Ni which have higher reduction potentials than die Fe. The contact causes a catiiodic and anodic potential to occur at d e surface increasing die rate of loss of TCE. The rate increases for Cu was about 7 times that observed for pure iron. For Ni, die rate increase was about 1.6 times with respect to iron. If the contact with die surface cannot occur then die increase of die rate of loss of TCE will not occur. Sn and Co have more positive reduction potentials but did not give an increase in rate of loss with respect to Fe. These metals can be placed directly on the surface by using salts. The metals will plate because they have a higher reduction potential dien die Fe metal. These metals could also be placed on die surface of iron through the use of sputtering techniques. Once placed directly on die surface, a rate increase in dehalogenation of TCE should occur. To show that d e plating direcdy would improve die rate of loss of TCE, O.lg of SnCl 2 . 2 H 2 0 was dissolved in .01N HCl solution. 30 grams of Mallinckrodt iron (40 mesh) was placed in 100 mL of water and stirred rapidly under a blanket of nitrogen. The Sn +2 solution was added rapidly to die stirred reactor. This process plated Sn onto die surface of the iron. The amount of tin was calculated to give a surface coverage much less than a monolayer based of a surface area of the iron of 0.5 m 2 /g as determined by BET measurements. The nitrogen was necessary since die exposed iron surface will corrode at an accelerated rate widi a partial coverage of Sn. The water was removed from the reactor and the tin plated iron washed several times with water followed by acetone. The tin plated iron was dried under a stream on nitrogen. The experiment was run against Mallinckrodt iron (40 mesh) having no Sn plated wim a TCE control which contained no metal. The control contained 200 ppm of TCE and diis was placed in a 12 mL vial and capped widi a Teflon ® line top. 7 grams of die tin plated iron was placed in a second 12 mL vial and die vial filled widi 200 ppm TCE solution so that no headspace existed. To a diird 12 mL vial, 14 grams of the tin plated iron was added and filled to die top widi 200 ppm solution of TCE. To a fourth 12 mL vial, 7 grams of die iron was added and die vial filled widi 200 ppm solution of TCE. The iron was prepared die same as die tin:iron except that no tin was added to die stirred reactor. Table I Half-lives for mixed metal experiments " duplicate samples run b rate increase = t 1/2> F Jt 1/2, mixed melal composιlion (# times increased) NDL = no detectable loss of TCE during experiment Table II shows the results of die plating of tin onto iron. The tin plate increases the rate by a factor of 7. Table II also shows diat d e rate depended on die amount of tin plated iron used indicating a surface dependence. This indicates that in die metal mixture reported in Table I that no plating or surface contact was occurring in die Fe:Sn mixture. Table 2 Rate increase due to tin plated on iron TCE Concentration Materials list / Priority Pollutant Standard Volatile Priority Pollutant Standards obtained from Restek Corporation (Catalogue numbers 30007, 30008, 30009, and 30010) widi each component at 2000 μg/mL. Individual halogenated compounds are listed in Table II containing a comparison of half-lives between different mixtures of copper metal or copper sulfate with iron. Iron powder (100 mesh) from Mallinckrodt Chemical, Inc. - 99.2% purity Formic Acid (88%) obtained from Fisher Scientific. Teflon ® Caps obtained from fisher Scientific 4 oz bottle obtained from Fisher Scientific Cupric sulfate pentahydrate obtained from Fisher Scientific Copper metal obtained from Fisher Scientific Experimental Restek calibration standards Mix 2 through 5 were combined resulting in a 500 ppm mixture of the volatile priority pollutants. One liter of Milli-Q water was spiked widi 48 μL 88% formic acid to be used as reagent water. Mallinckrodt Iron (6 g) was weighed into four 4 oz (119 mL) sample bottles. One bottle was chosen as a control containing no iron and only water and die volatile priority pollutants. Copper metal (1 g) was weighed into one bottle containing iron, and cupric sulfate pentahydrate (1.26 g and 0.44 g ) was weighed into two other bottles containing iron. Another bottle containing no iron was selected to serve as a simulated spiked sample. To each bottle, 100 mL of reagent water were added. The bottles were capped and shaken. Each reaction mixture was uncapped and spiked subsurface widi 400 uL of die volatile priority pollutant standard mixture and capped. The bottles were placed on a Lab Line Orbit Environ Shaker and rotated at 150 RPM. Vials were removed for sampling and 2 mL were removed and added to a 1.5 mL autosampler vial equipped widi Teflon ® Faced septum. The auto sampler vials were filled until tiiey overflowed and were then capped to minimize headspace. This was done to minimize loss of die highly volatile components. Reaction mixtures were sampled at 23.13 hours, 46.78 hours, 54.38 hours, and 71.66 hours respectively. In each batch experiment, a set of samples were run so that relative comparisons could be made widiin a set. The samples consisted of a comparative sample vial with Fe metal for which the comparison was to be made at a certain mass, a control sample vial containing die volatile organic priority pollutants but no metals, and die samples with Fe and Cu or Cu salts. Because many of these compounds have a relatively large partial pressure in water it was necessary diat all rates be determined relative to die vial containing water, the compounds and no metal. This vial is referred to as die simulated spiked sample. The mass of the metal in die samples was always maintained die same widiin a set of experiments, since die rates depend on surface area and dierefore die mass used such diat die comparisons of rate increases are made against a control of Fe having die same mass. The same procedure for determining rate of die reaction was carried out in d ese experiments as in die experimental procedure for die metal mixtures (Example 1). Plots of In C C 0 versus the sampling times indicated pseudo first order rates. Linear least squares fit of die data provide die rate constants and from the rate constants' half-lives can be calculated using t 1/2 =ln(2)/k. In some cases the reactions were so rapid diat only one data point could be obtained. In diese cases the reaction was assumed to be pseudo first order and a rate constant and half life calculated from that point. In some cases the reaction was so rapid diat at die first sampling time of 23.13 hours mere was no detectable signal. Again the reaction was assumed to be pseudo first order and a maximum rate constant and half-life calculated based on die detection limit for that compound. For both of these cases die half-lives are indicated widi a less dian symbol. Analytical procedures Analysis were performed using a Tekmar Liquid Sample Concentrator LCS-2 interfaced widi a Hewlett Packard 5890 gas chromatograph with a Hewlett Packard 5970 mass selective detector. This technique is referred to as purge and trap analyses. Generally, the technique involved adding 0.3 mL of die samples from the 1.5 mL autosampler vials to 10 mL purge and trap tubes which had 5 mL deionized water in diem , which were then sequentially sparged widi 30 mL/ minute helium onto a Supelco- 1-2547 1 % SP-1000 60/80 mesh carbopack B 8" X 1/8" stainless steel trap column at 27 degrees C. The trap column was desorbed for 8 minutes at 200 "C onto the chromatographic column which was held at 10 'C during the desorb cycle. Separation was performed using a 30 m J&W DB-624 0.53 mm I.D. wi 0.25 μM film thickness column. The chromatographic conditions employed were a starting temperature of 10 * C which was held for 6 minutes followed by ramping the oven at 10 degrees per minute until 200 * C. The oven was held at die final temperature for 5 minutes. Mass spectral data was collected from 30 to 350 amu for the duration of the each run. Concentrations were determined by comparing the results to a standard curved using a Hewlett Packard UNIX based data system equipped widi Throughput Target data reduction software. Results Table III shows the half-lives and improvement in dehalogenation rate obtained for each compound in die chemical mixture for the different Fe and Fe/Cu combinations. The results demonstrate mat halogenated aromatics, i.e. benzene and chlorobenzene, did not show any loss for any combination indicating diat diese compounds are not affected by die Fe or the Fe/Cu combinations under the conditions studied. The Fe:Cu metal mixtures generally showed a detectable increase in die rate of dehalogenation as indicated by a lower half-life for most of the compounds when compared to iron. Where the Fe/Cu combinations showed no detectable loss (NDL), diere may have been an improvement in the chlorinated compounds but die experiment was not run long enough to detect loss of diese compounds widi Fe or the Fe/Cu combination. For example 1,2-dichloroethane showed no detectable improvement for the Fe alone and Fe: Cu metal mixture. For the halogenated aliphatics where there was NDL, it is believed that a loss would have been detected if die experiment was run for a longer time. In die cases where there was NDL for die Fe alone, die % improvement has not been calculated. In die case of bromodichlormediane and bromoform, the dehalogenation occurred so rapidly diat die differences between die results were within the detection limits of the GC analysis. The addition of CuS0 4 5H 2 0 to the water containing Fe causes die Cu to plate onto die Fe surface. The more CuS0 4 . 5H 2 0 added to die solution die more Cu that plates onto the Fe surface. Therefore there is more Cu plated onto die Fe surface for 1.2g CuS0 4 • 5H 2 0 as compared to the 0.44 g CuS0 4 • 5H 2 0. In comparing me CuS0 4 • 5H 2 0 experiments wid die Fe and die Fe:Cu in Table III, it can be seen that the Fe:Cu combinations generally showed significant improvement for die rate of dehalogenation compared to die Fe alone. For many of die halogenated compounds, die improvement was that die rates went from a no detectable loss over the time period of die experiment to half- lives diat were less dian 4 hours. Where measured comparisons could be made between the Fe and the Fe:CuS0 4 - 5H 2 0 (1.2g) the improvement in rate was >20 times mat observed for Fe alone. Also noted in Table III is diat where detectable half-lives were measured, d e comparison between the CuS0 4 - 5H 2 0 (0.44g) and CuS0 4 - 5H 2 0 (1.2g) showed a longer half life for the lower coverage. One exception to diat was with 1,2- dichloroethane where the half-life increased for the higher coverage Fe: CuS0 4 - 5H 2 0 (1.2g) . It is unclear why this was the case. Chloromethane showed no improvement when comparing die metal mixture of Fe:Cu and the Fe: CuS0 4 • 5H 2 0 mixtures. Part of die reason was d e high volatility of diis compound which made die uncertainty in the half- lives large and makes comparisons difficult. The results of these experiments demonstrate that significant increases in rates can be obtained by plating Cu onto Fe. The rate increases can be as high as 20 times, e.g. up to a 96.4 % improvement in dehalogenation rate. The amount of Cu on die Fe surface affects the rate and an improvement was generally noted as die amount of Cu was increased. Table III Comparison of half-lives' 1 (t 1/2 ) for Dehalogenation of Various Halogenated Organics NDL = No detectable Loss 1 rate increase = t 1/2 F< Jt 1/2 , mi χ ed mcui co mp os i t i o n (# ώnes increased) b half-lives were determined using detection limits and assuming pseudo first order rates or on one detectable point. c comparative run d half-lives reported in hours. Example 3 Materials list : Coverage Study and the use of other more positive reduction metals Iron powder (100 mesh) from Mallinckrodt Chemical, Inc. - 99.2% purity Teflon ® Caps obtained from Fisher Scientific 8 mL bottle obtained from Fisher Scientific Cupric sulfate pentahydrate obtained from Fisher Scientific Tube Rotator obtained from Scientific Equipment Products Cupric nitrate dihydrate obtained from Fisher Scientific B& Hexane Trichloroethylene (99+ %) obtained from Aldrich Chemical Company 8 mL National Scientific Company vials wim Teflon ® /silicone septum obtained from Fisher Scientific Ag 2 S0 4 purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company AuCl 3 purchased from Aesar Experimental The study widi die mixtures of halogenated compounds indicated diat die amount of Cu on die iron surface affects the rates of the dehalogenation reaction, i.e. as d e amount increased die rate increased. In those experiments no effort was made to coat the Fe surface uniformly. Thus how die coverage specifically affected die rates could not be easily determined. To specifically test d is effect the following experiment to control the coverage was conducted. The plating of Cu metal on Fe was carried out in a way to try to obtain a uniform plating of die iron. To do diis any technique used must maintain a highly stirred system. To plate the iron, CuS0 4 -5H 2 0 was dissolved in water. The Cu +2 was agitated rapidly as 30 grams of Mallinckrodt Iron were added to die solution. The amount of Cu +2 to be plated was varied so d at d e coverage of the iron would be less dian a monolayer to well over a monolayer. In determining the concentration of Cu +2 to use it was assumed diat die Cu atom on the surface was a sphere with an atomic radii of 1.1 angstroms. The surface area of the iron as determined by BET measurements using Ar gas was 0.5 m 2 /g for a total of 15 m 2 for me 30 grams of Fe. Thus 0.1 grams of CuS0 4 -5H 2 0 would theoretically yield 0.59 of a total monolayer coverage of the surface. Considering that Cu can plate on itself diis coverage is an overestimate of the coverage and die actual coverage was < 0.59 of a monolayer coverage of die surface. The 1.1 gram CuS0 4 '5H 2 0 sample should dieoretically increase the coverage to 7 monolayers and die 5 grams CuS0 4 -5H 2 0 sample should dieoretically give a coverage of 30 monolayers. However, the preference for Cu to plate on itself results in samples with < 7 and < 30 monolayers respectively. The coverage was confirmed by visual inspection of die iron. Widi less dian a monolayer (dieoretically) die Cu is not visible (<0.59 monolayer run). As die coverage increases e Cu red color begins to appear. At the highest coverage the metal surface appears to be copper with some iron present. At a coverage below a monolayer rapid corrosion of the iron begins if oxygen is present. To slow diis process die plating was carried out under a nitrogen blanket. TCE standards of 730 ppm solution were made by adding 125 μL TCE to 250 mL water. Cu coated Fe (5 g) was weighed into an 8 mL vial. This was repeated for each of die three different Cu plating concentrations. Anodier bottle containing no iron was selected to serve as a simulated spiked sample. A vial containing die 5 grams of iron treated in the same manner as die Cu coated but containing no Cu was prepared so diat comparison of die rates could be made. To each vial TCE solution was added to die top and capped. The bottles were placed on a Tube Rotator and rotated at 18 RPM. Vials were removed for sampling and 0.1 mL removed and extracted into hexane following die procedure outlined in Example 1. Data were examined in die same manner described in die previous studies. That is plots of In C C 0 versus die sampling times indicates pseudo first order rates. Linear least squares fit of die data provide die rate constants and from the rate constants' half-lives were calculated using t 1 2 =ln(2)/k. Analytical procedures Determination of me concentration of TCE was carried out using die methods described in die analytical section of Example 1. Chloride determinations were made using Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (CZE) methods provided by Dionex. The CZE instrument was a CZE Dionex CES 1. Results Table IV shows the pseudo first order half-lives for each of the experiments. As can be seen from the results in Table IV die rate increases for a coverage less than half of the surface. As die coverage increases die rate begins to slow until at the highest coverage examined die rate has decreased to 40% of die highest rate observed in this series. Higher increases in rates with respect to iron were observed for die studies involving die mixture of halogenated compounds. But die coverage was not carefully controlled and die amount of available iron surface was probably larger. This would indicate diat die 0.59 monolayer coverage would not be die maximum rate and dius the rate for lower coverage would be faster. Studies wid pure Cu metal with no Fe present showed no loss of TCE over time periods of 100 hours. This clearly indicates diat once die iron is completely covered by many monolayers of Cu die dehalogenation reaction would not occur. In addition, diis clearly indicates diat die <7 and < 30 monolayer samples had surfaces widi available iron, i.e. the iron surface was not completely coated widi copper. Table IV Variation in half-life as Cu Coverage Increases a rate increase = t 1/2> F Jt, 2 , m∞ d ∞ ui compose (# times increased) Anodier copper salt tried was Cu(N0 3 ) 2 .2H 2 0. Table V indicates diat die use of diis salt provided die Cu 2+ ions in solution for plating on Fe. The use of the nitrate salt makes it more difficult to control die uniformity of the Cu plating because of the nitrate oxidation potentials. This can be seen in Table 5 by the increase in rates as me amount of Cu(N0 3 ) 2 -2H 2 0 used widi 30 grams of Fe increased. At similar levels using die CuS0 4 -5H 2 0 die iron took on die appearance of Cu. Widi the Cu(N0 3 ) 2 -2H 2 0 the Cu could not be seen on die surface of the Fe. This means that die amount of Cu salt used to give die optimum coverage will vary with the salt used. Table V also shows die chloride produced during die reaction time indicating diat, widiin experimental error, 3 moles of Cl ' was produced for each mole of TCE lost indicating a stoichiometric dechlorination. Headspace studies indicated mat the carbon products were e iene, ethane, propene, propane, and small amounts of C 4 to C 6 hydrocarbons. The carbon balance was found to be greater than 90% base on diese measured hydrocarbons. Table V Observed half-life for Cu Plated on Fe Using Cu(NO;j) 2 «2H 2 0 rate increase = t 1/2> Fe /t 1/2ι ^^ melal ^^^ (# times increased) Salts of Ag and Au were also examined. These metals have a higher reduction potential tiian Fe and dierefore should plate onto iron. The amount of Ag and Au salt used was calculated to be sure diat die coverage of die surface would not exceed 1 monolayer for 30 grams of Fe. For this study, die Fe:Cu with a coverage calculated to be <0.59 monolayers (Table IV) was utilized. As in all studies, an Fe control was run along widi a simulated spike. These experiment were run in the same manner as the previous experiments except mat 10 grams of metal were added to die 8 mL vials. The half-lives were determined from the pseudo first order rate constants are shown in Table VI. As the amount of metal is increased die rate increases. The rate for the Fe:Cu (<0.59 monolayers) was faster than diat observed when 5 grams were used (see Table IV). The same occurred for die Fe. Ten grams of iron had a half-life of 53 hours compare with die 111 hours shown for 5 grams in Table IV. The rates for the Ag and Au botii show a marked increase over die Fe. The improvement is comparable to that observed for die Fe-.Cu. Table VI Half-life: Metals Plated on Iron In addition to die experiments for coverage of Cu on iron, experiments to examine die dechlorination rates of a cyclic alkane were conducted. The compound studied was trans- 1,2-dichlorocyclohexane (DCC) obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co. The experiment was run against Mallinckrodt iron 40 mesh having no Cu plated. A control containing 50 ppm of DCC but no metal was placed in an 8 mL vial. Ten grams of die iron was placed in an 8 mL vial and die vial filled widi 400 ppm DCC solution so diat no headspace existed. To a diird 8 mL vial, 10 grams of the Cu plated iron were added and die vial filled to die top widi 400 ppm solution of DCC. All vials were capped widi a Teflon ® lined top. At die end of 72 hours the concentration of trans- 1,2-dichlorocyclohexane was determined using GC/MS techniques. The mass spectrometer was operated in El mode and selected ion monitoring so diat low detection limits could be obtained. The molecular ions of the trans- 1,2-dichlorocyclohexane were monitored. The gc was an HP5890 equipped widi a DB 624 0.32 mm x 30 meter column. A 0.1 mL sample of water from the vial was placed into a vial containing 1 mL of hexane. One microliter of me hexane extract was injected into die gc. 2 microliter s were injected for the samples containing die metals. The results were assumed to follow a pseudo first order rate. The half-lives were calculated to be 24 hours for die Fe and < 6.6 hours for die Fe plated widi Cu. This was an REF of >0.73 and a rate increase of > 3.6. The *< * symbol was used widi die Fe plated wid Cu half-life because trans- 1,2-dichlorocyclohexane was below detection limits. These results show that improvements in the rate of dehalogenation occurs for halogenated alicyclic compounds.

Claims: THAT WHICH IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A method for dehalogenation of aqueous compositions contaminated widi halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons comprising: (a) contacting an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal widi a soluble metal salt in me presence of a liquid comprising water for a time sufficient to deposit metal derived from the soluble metal salt on die anchor metal to produce a mixed metal composition wherein die amount of metal derived from the soluble metal salt in said mixed metal composition is an amount effective to increase the dehalogenation rate compared to use of iron alone, and die surface of said mixed metal composition has exposed iron metal, and wherein the metal in said soluble salt is copper, nickel, molybdenum, tin, lead, silver, chromium, palladium, platinum or gold, and (b) contacting said aqueous composition wim an amount of said mixed metal composition effective to dehalogenate said halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons at a temperature of at least 10 "C. 2. The method of Claim 1 wherein the amount of metal derived from the soluble metal salt in said mixed metal composition is an amount effective to obtain a Rate Enhancement Factor of at least about 0.15. 3. The mediod of Claim 1 wherein said metal derived from said soluble metal salt is copper, nickel or tin. 4. The mediod of Claim 3 wherein said metal derived from said soluble metal salt is copper. ' 5. The method of Claim 4 wherein said soluble metal salt is selected from the group consisting of copper sulfate, copper chloride and copper nitrate. 6. The method of Claim 1 wherein the halogen of each said halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon is selected from the group consisting of fluorine, chlorine, bromine and mixtures thereof. 7. The method of Claim 6 wherein said halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons are chloroaliphatics, bromoaliphatics or chloro.bromoaliphatics. 8. The mediod of Claim 1 wherein steps (a) and (b) are performed simultaneously. 9. The method of Claim 1 wherein the contaminated aqueous composition is groundwater. 10. The mediod of Claim 9 wherein the dehalogenation takes place in situ. 11. The method of Claim 1 further comprising adding a complexing agent in step (a). 12. A method for dehalogenation of aqueous compositions contaminated wid halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons comprising: (a) contacting an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal with a second metal selected from the group consisting of copper and nickel in die presence of a liquid comprising water for a time sufficient to deposit me second metal on die anchor metal to produce a mixed metal composition wherein die amount of said second metal in said mixed metal composition is an amount effective to increase die dehalogenation rate compared to use of iron alone and die surface of said mixed metal composition has exposed iron metal, and wherein the amount of said second metal charged to form said mixed metal composition is about 0.08 weight percent to about 50 weight percent of the total amount of the second metal and die anchor metal charged; and (b) contacting said aqueous composition widi an amount of said mixed metal composition effective to dehalogenate said halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons at a temperature of at least 10 * C. 13. The method of Claim 12 wherein die amount of said second metal in said mixed metal composition is an amount effective to obtain a Rate Enhancement Factor of at least about 0.15. 14. The method of Claim 12 wherein the halogen of each said halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon is selected from die group consisting of fluorine, chlorine, bromine and mixtures thereof. 15. The method of Claim 14 wherein said halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons are chloroaliphatics, bromoaliphatics or chloro.bromoaliphatics. 16. The method of Claim 12 wherein steps (a) and (b) are performed simultaneously. 17. The method of Claim 12 wherein die contaminated aqueous composition is groundwater. 18. The method of Claim 17 wherein die dehalogenation takes place in situ. 19. A method for dehalogenation of aqueous compositions contaminated widi halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons comprising contacting said aqueous composition widi an amount of a mixed metal composition effective to dehalogenate said halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons at a temperature of at least 10 * C, wherein said mixed metal composition comprises a second metal selected from the group consisting of copper, cobalt, nickel, molybdenum, bismudi, tin, lead, silver, chromium, palladium, platinum and gold deposited on an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal and wherein die amount of second metal in said mixed metal composition is an amount effective to increase the dehalogenation rate compared to use of iron alone, and the surface of said mixed metal composition has exposed iron metal. 20. The method of Claim 19 wherein die amount of said second metal in said mixed metal composition is an amount effective to obtain a Rate Enhancement Factor of at least about 0.15. 21. The method of Claim 19 wherein said second metal is copper, nickel, cobalt or tin. 22. The method of Claim 21 wherein said second metal is copper. 23. The me iod of Claim 19 wherein said second metal is derived from a soluble metal salt. 24. The mediod of Claim 23 wherein said soluble metal salt is selected from the group consisting of copper sulfate, copper chloride and copper nitrate. 25. The method of Claim 19 wherein die halogen of each said halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbon is selected from the group consisting of fluorine, chlorine, bromine and mixtures thereof. 26. The method of Claim 25 wherein said halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons are chloroaliphatics, bromoaliphatics or chloro.bromoaliphatics. 27. The method of Claim 19 wherein the contaminated aqueous composition is groundwater. 28. The method of Claim 27 wherein the dehalogenation takes place in situ.. 29. A method for dehalogenation of aqueous compositions contaminated widi halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons comprising: (a) contacting an anchor metal consisting essentially of iron metal with a nonaqueous electroless plating solution comprising a soluble metal halide salt complex and a suitable solvent for a time sufficient to deposit metal derived from die soluble metal halide salt on the anchor metal to produce a mixed metal composition wherein the amount of metal derived from the soluble metal halide salt in die mixed metal composition is an amount effective to increase the dehalogenation rate compared to use of iron alone, and die surface of the mixed metal composition has exposed iron metal, and wherein the metal in the soluble salt is cobalt, copper, nickel, bismuth or lead, (b) recovering die mixed metal composition, and (c) contacting said aqueous composition widi an amount of said mixed metal composition effective to dehalogenate said halogenated aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons at a temperature of at least 10 * C. 30. The method of Claim 29 wherein the amount of metal derived from the soluble metal salt in said mixed metal composition is an amount effective to obtain a Rate Enhancement Factor of at least about 0.15. 31. The me od of Claim 29 wherein said soluble metal halide salt complex is a complex of a salt selected from die group consisting of cobaltous chloride, copper chloride, nickel chloride, bismuth chloride and lead chloride widi a basic nitrogen compound wherein said basic nitrogen compound is a hydrochloride of a nitrogen- containing base. 32. The mediod of Claim 31 wherein said basic nitrogen compound is selected from the group consisting of NH 4 C1, H 3 CNH 2 HC1, H 3 CNH HC1, morpholine hydrochloride, and pyridine hydrochloride. 33. The method of Claim 31 wherein said salt is cobaltous chloride or copper chloride. 34. The method of Claim 29 wherein said suitable solvent is dimethylsulfoxide.

Inventors: HO SA V, MCKENZIE DAVID E, ORTH ROBERT G, HO, SA, V., MCKENZIE, DAVID, E., ORTH, ROBERT, G.
Applicants: HO SA V, MCKENZIE DAVID E, MONSANTO CO, ORTH ROBERT G, HO, SA, V., MCKENZIE, DAVID, E., MONSANTO COMPANY, ORTH, ROBERT, G.
Application year: 1996
Main classification: B01J23
IPC codes: A62D3, A62D101, B01J23, B01J37, B09C1, C02F1