COIN VALIDATOR

Abstract: A coin validator (1) is provided with at least two reference positions (U, D) for determining a diameter related characteristic of a coin being validated. In order to reduce the running to the testing station, the timing of a trailing point of the coin passing a first reference position (U) is used to determine the diameter related characteristic. Embodiments using optical (6, 8, 9, 11, 30, 32), inductive (50, 51, 52) and piezo-electric (55) sensors associated with the reference positions are disclosed. An inductive sensor (12) for a coin validator comprises an elongate coil, which, when in use, is arranged such that the magnetic field is substantially constant across the width of the passageway. The use of coils of this type have the advantage of wrap around coils but enable the coin passageway to be shallower and be opened. A coin validator (1) is described wherein the backwall of a coin passageway (2) is movable to and fro so that the depth of the coin passageway (2) can be adjusted. In an embodiment, a cam (63) bears against the backwall (62) of the coin passageway (2) to set the depth thereof.

Description: Coin Validator Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a coin validator. Background to the Invention US-A-4 474 281 discloses a coin validation apparatus wherein a pair of optical beams are directed across the coin path of a validator, substantially in the plane of a coin under test. The optical beams are spaced along the direction of travel of a coin in the coin path. The diameter of a coin is determined by timing the periods during which each of the optical beams is interrupted by a passing coin, determining a value for the speed of the coin as it crosses the beams, deriving two diameter values from the timed periods and the speed values, and averaging the resultant values. The average produced is proportional to the diameter of the coin interrupting the beams. If the apparatus of US-A-4 474 281 is to function correαly, a coin to be tested must be in free fall before it encounters the first optical beam. A problem arises from this in that it is difficult to produce a compact validator with a sufficient run-in for a coin to be in free fall, before it interrupts the first optical beam. The problem is particularly acute in the case of validators for the large tokens used in some casinos. DE-A-2 724 868 discloses an apparatus in which the diameter of a coin is checked on the basis of the time between the leading edge of the coin reaching a lower reference and the trailing edge of the coin leaving an upper reference position. However, this apparatus suffers from two disadvantages. Firstly, a counter is started when the coin reaches the upper reference position. Consequently, the upper reference position must be located at least the diameter of the largest acceptable coin from the coin insertion slot. Secondly, the example, in which the diameter of a coin is checked on the basis of the time between the leading edge of the coin reaching a lower reference and the trailing edge of the coin leaving an upper reference position, cannot be used with coins whose diameters are not greater than the separation of the reference positions. GB-A-1 405 936 discloses a coin validation apparatus comprising means defining first and second reference positions spaced along a coin path, sensor means for detecting a trailing point on a coin passing the first reference position and a leading point on the coin reaching the second reference, and processing means for determining the velocity of a coin under test on the basis of the output of the sensor means. However, the diameter of the coin is checked using additional sensors. In the following the term "coin" means coin, token and any similar objects representing value. Summary of the Invention It is an aim of the present invention to overcome the afore-mentioned disadvantages of the prior art. According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a coin validation apparatus comprising means defining first and second reference positions spaced along a coin path, sensor means for detecting a trailing point on a coin passing the first reference position and a leading point on the coin reaching the second reference position, and processing means for checking the diameter of a coin under test on the basis of said trailing point passing the first reference position and said leading point reaching the second reference position, characterized in that the processing means checks the diameter of the coin under test without reference to said leading point reaching the first reference position. Preferably, the processing means checks the diameter of the coin under test on the basis of the time difference between said trailing point passing the first reference position and said leading point reaching the second reference position. In some embodiments of the present invention, the diameter checked is the physical diameter of a coin under test. However, in other embodiments the diameter is checked on the basis of characterising signal representative of a property related to diameter but dependent also on additional factors such a the material from which a coin under test is made. The reference positions will, in practice, generally have a non-infinitesimal dimension in the direction of coin travel. Thus, as the diameter-related characteristic determination is based on the time of a coin leaving the first reference position, there is no need for the run-in required by the prior art. Indeed, the first reference position can be located such that a coin extends across it even before a coin is fully in the validator. As a result of friction between a coin under test and the walls of the passageway and other factors, the speed of a coin passing through the optical beams is indeterminate and some correction for this is normally required. However, if the gap between the reference positions is the same as the diameter of a coin of interest, no correction is required. This is because, for a valid coin, the trailing point leaves the upstream reference position at the same time as the leading point enters the downstream reference position, regardless of the speed of the coin. Therefore, in one preferred embodiment, the reference positions are separated by the diameter of a coin type to be accepted by the validator. Additional reference positions could be added, each spaced from the first by the diameter of a coin type to be accepted. However, if more than a few denominations of coin are to be accepted, the complexity of this arrangement becomes undesirable. In order to avoid this undesirable complexity, another preferred embodiment includes means to determine a velocity dependent value for a coin passing the reference positions, wherein the processing means is further responsive to the velocity dependent value for a coin under test to produce the characterising signal. The means to determine a velocity dependent value may comprise means to determine the time elapsing between the trailing point passing the first reference position and the trailing point passing the second reference position. s However, the use of the first and second reference positions for velocity determination is not ideal if the coin accept gate is only a short distance below the second reference position. In such a case there may be insufficient time to process coin characterising signals before a decision must be made whether to open the accept gate. In order to overcome this situation, the 0 means to determine a velocity dependent value may comprise a third reference position downstream of the first reference position and further sensor means for detecting said leading point reaching the third reference position, wherein the processing means is responsive to the sensor means to derive said velocity dependent value on the basis of the time difference between said leading point s reaching the second reference position and said leading point reaching the third reference position. Thus, all the coin characterising data is obtained before the coin has passed fully through the last reference position. Preferably, the processing means produces the characterising signal on the 0 basis of the result of: ft; - ) i ~ ) where: t, is the time of trailing point passing the upper first reference position, and t 2 and t 3 are the times of the leading point reaching the second and S third reference positions. The trailing and leading points on a coin under test will be substantially on the circumference of the coin with some types of sensor. However, the operation of other sensors means the leading and trailing points will be located radially inward of the coins circumference with one on either side of a diameter of the coin, which runs perpendicular to the coin's direction of travel. Preferably, the sensor means comprises a beam of optical radiation crossing the coin path and a detector therefor for each said reference position. More preferably, the coin path has a breadth to accommodate the thickness of a coin under test, a width to accommodate the coin's diameter, and a length along which coins under test can pass edgewise, wherein the sensor means includes emitter means on one side of the passageway for direαing said beams of optical radiation across the width of the passageway and deteαors opposite respeαive emitter means. If the beams are closely spaced, it is advantageous that adjacent beams shine in opposite direαions across the coin passageway. This avoids one beam being deteαed by the photosensor of another beam. However, other forms of sensor may be used. For instance, the sensor means may comprise induαive sensors. In a preferred embodiment using induαive sensors, the coin path has a breadth to accommodate the thickness of a coin under test, a width to accommodate the coin's diameter, and a length along which coins under test can pass edgewise, wherein the sensor means includes an elongate induαor arranged substantially parallel to the width direαion of the path and having its winding axis substantially parallel to the direαion of travel of coins along the path. In a further embodiment, the sensor means comprises a piezo-eleαric element associated with each reference position, the piezo-eleαric elements being arranged to be stressed by the passage of a coin to produce eleαric signals. Preferably, at least one of the piezo-eleαric elements comprises a flap, arranged to stress a piezo-eleαric film as a passing coin displaces it. According to the first aspeα of the present invention, there is further provided a method of validating a coin comprising the steps of: (a) moving a coin edgewise past first and second reference positions, the reference positions being fixed relative to each other; and (b) determining the time difference between a trailing point on the coin passing the first reference position and a leading point on the coin reaching the second reference; charaαerized by (c) checking the diameter of the coin on the basis of said time difference without reference to said leading point reaching the first reference position. Preferably, a method according to the present invention includes the step of producing a coin velocity dependent value, wherein said velocity dependent value is used to derive the value charaαeristic of the coin. More preferably, such a method comprises the steps of: (d) moving a coin edgewise past a third reference position; (e) determining the time difference between said leading point reaching the second reference position and said leading point reaching the fourth reference; (f) deriving a value representative of the coin's velocity on the basis of said time difference. Preferably, optical sensing means is used to deteα a trailing point on the coin's circumference passing the first reference position and a leading point on the coin's circumference reaching the second reference. However, induαive sensing means or piezo-eleαric sensing means could be used for determining said time difference or differences. In many situations, merely measuring the diameter of a disc will not be sufficient to determine whether it is a valid member of a predetermined set of coin types. Typically, additional information will be derived using induαive sensors. In one type of induαive sensor, a coil is arranged beside the coin passageway, with its axis perpendicular to the plane of a coin travelling along the passageway. These induαive sensors are undesirable for compaα coin validators if they are wound in the form of a circle or square because this increases the length required for the passageway. However, reducing the dimensions of the coil in the direαion of travel of coins to be tested, produces an unacceptable degradation of performance. s A solution to this problem is the use of so called "wrap around" coils. Wrap around coils are arranged so that a coin to be tested passes along the axis of the coil. However, these coils cannot be opened for maintenance or rejeαion of jammed coins. This often necessitates a wider than desired gap through which coins under test pass, reducing sensitivity. 0 It is also an aim of the present invention to overcome the afore-mentioned disadvantages of prior art validator coil arrangements. According to a second aspeα of the present invention, there is provided a s coin validation apparatus comprising means defining a passageway for coins under test, the passageway having a breadth to accommodate the thickness of a coin under test, a width to accommodate the coin's diameter, and a length along which coins under test can pass edgewise, and an induαive coin sensing station including a coil assembly beside the passageway and arranged to 0 induαively couple with a major face of a coin therein, charaαerized in that the coil assembly is arranged such that the magnetic field produced thereby is substantially constant across the width of the passageway. Preferably, the induαive coin sensing station comprises first and second coils s opposite each other across the breadth of the passageway and having their axes substantially parallel to the direαion of travel of a coin in the passageway past the sensing station. With such an arrangement, the coils can be switched between in-phase and anti-phase modes of operation. This cannot, of course, be achieved using a wrap-around coil. 0 Preferably, the or each coil is wound in the form of an elongate oval or reαangle on a former of magnetic material which is, at least, substantially as long as the passageway is wide. Advantageously, the or each coil includes an elongate I-seαion former. However, an E- or C-seαion former may be used. If the former is E-seαioned, the coil may be wound around the top, bottom or middle arms. If the former is C-seαioned, the coil may be wound around s any part. Preferably, a validator includes shielding means to magnetically shield portions of the or each coil not immediately adjacent the passageway. 0 The slim shape of the coils employed in a validator according to this second aspeα enables a more compaα validator to be construαed. Alternatively, the space saved can be used for additional sensors of the same or different types. Since the windings of these coils include portions lying parallel to the coin passageway across its entire width, the magnetic field produced in the s passageway is substantially constant across the width of the passageway. Consequently, the response to the passage of a coin, obtained from these coils, is independent of the position of a coin across the width of the passageway. This is particularly advantageous in the case of validators where coins are in free fall past the induαive sensor station because the path followed by a coin 0 cannot be rigidly controlled. Another advantage of the shape of these coils is that they are easier to screen than the coils used in prior art validators. S It has been found that coils of this type are more linear in their response to passing coins than prior art designs. According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a coin validating apparatus comprising a coin path having a breadth sufficient to 0 accommodate the thickness of a coin under test, wherein a wall, defining in part said breadth, is repositionable to thereby vary said breadth. Preferably, a cam is arranged to aα on said wall for repositioning thereof. More preferably, a sense coil is mounted to said wall for sensing a coin moving along the coin path. Whilst the different aspeαs of the present invention provide significant s advantages when applied individually, a compaα validator, particularly suited to the validation of large "casino" tokens, can be construαed by applying both the first and second aspeαs. In such a validator, the induαive coin sensing station is preferably located between the upstream coin sensing station and the or a sequentially first downstream coin sensing station. 0 Brief Description of the Drawings Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 shows a validator according to a first embodiment of the present s invention with its front cover removed; Figure 2 is a seαional view along A A of the validator of Figure 1; Figure 3 is a block diagram of the eleαronic circuit of the validator of Figure 1; Figures 4a to 4e illustrate the passage of a coin past the optical sensor stations 0 of the validator of Figure 1 operating according to the first embodiment of the present invention with its front cover removed; Figure 5 is a validator according to a second embodiment of the present invention; Figures 6a to 6e illustrate the passage of a small coin past the optical sensor S stations of the validator of Figure 1 operating according to the second embodiment of the present invention; Figures 7a to 7ά illustrate the passage of a large coin past the optical sensor stations of the validator of Figure 1 operating according to the second embodiment of the present invention; 0 Figure 8 shows a validator according to a third embodiment of the present invention with its front cover removed; Figure 9 is a seαional view along A A of the validator of Figure 8; Figure 10 is a block diagram of the eleαronic circuit of the validator of Figure 8; Figures lla to lid illustrate the passage of a small coin past the optical sensor stations of the validator of Figure 8 operating according to the third embodiment of the present invention; Figures 12a to 12e illustrate the passage of a large coin past the optical sensor stations of the validator of Figure 8 operating according to the third embodiment of the present invention; Figure 13 is an exploded view of a sense coil; Figure 14 is a seαional view of a sense coil as shown in Figure 13; Figure 15 shows a validator according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention; Figure 16 is a block diagram of the eleαronic circuit of the validator of Figure 15; Figure 17 shows a validator according to a fifth embodiment of the present invention; Figure 18 is a block diagram of the eleαronic circuit of the validator of Figure 17; Figure 19 illustrates signals produced by the interface circuit of Figure 18; Figure 20 shows a piezo-eleαric sensor suitable for use instead of the optical sensors used in the validators of Figures 1, 5 and 8; Figure 21 shows the passage of a coin past a sensor as shown in Figure 20; Figure 22 shows a modification applicable to the validators of Figures 1, 5, 8, 15 and 17. Detailed Description of Embodiments Referring to Figures 1 and 2, a coin validator body 1 defines a reαangular cross-seαion coin passageway 2. The passageway 2 comprises a straight, vertical upper portion 2a, where various sensor stations 3 are located, and a wider lower portion 2b. An accept gate 4 is arranged for diverting coins along either of two routes A, B. The accept gate 4 normally blocks route A but is opened if the signals from the sensor stations 3 indicate that a valid coin has been inserted into the validator. The upper portion 2a of the passageway 2 has a width w greater than the diameter of the largest coin 5 of interest and a depth b greater than the thickness of the thickest coin of interest. The entry to the upper portion 2a of the passageway is flared so as to simplify alignment of the validator with a coin insertion slot (not shown). Considering the sensor stations 3 in more detail, an upstream optical sensor station comprises a lensed light emitting diode (LED) 6 mounted in the validator body 1, so as to shine a beam U of light across the width w of the passageway 2 through a slit 7 opening into the passageway 2. The slit 7 extends across the full depth b of the upper portion 2a of the passageway. A lensed photosensor 8 aligned to receive the beam from the LED 6 completes the upstream optical sensor station. A downstream optical sensor is similarly construαed from a lensed LED 9, a slit 10 and a lensed photosensor 11 to shine a beam D across the passageway 2, and is located a short distance below the upstream sensor. Two elongate sense coils 12 are located between the upstream and the downstream optical sensor stations. The sense coils 12 are press fitted longitudinally into respeαive slots extending transversely across the width w of the upper portion 2a of the passageway. The sense coils 12 will be described in more detail below. Referring to Figure 3, the LEDs 6,9 are driven by LED driver circuitry 15 in order to produce the upstream and downstream beams U,D. The LEDs 6,9 typically produce optical radiation in the infra-red range although visible radiation can also be used. It will thus be appreciated that as used herein, the term optical radiation includes both visible and non-visible optical radiation. The photosensors 8,11 are conneαed to interface circuitry 16 which produces digital signals x., x 2 in response to interruptions of the upstream and downstream beams UJ , as a coin falls along the passageway 2 past the sensor stations 3. The coin signals x p x 2 are fed to a microprocessor 17. As explained in our United Kingdom patent application no. 2 169 429, the induαive coupling between the coils 12 and a passing coin 5 gives rise to apparent impedance changes for the coil which are dependent on the type of coin under test. The apparent impedance changes are processed by coil interface circuitry 18 to provide a coin parameter signals x^ x 4 , which are a funαion of the apparent impedance changes. The microprocessor 17 carries out a validation process on the basis of the signals x p x p x 3 , x 4 under the control of a program, stored in an EEPROM 19. If, as a result of the validation processes performed by the microprocessor 17, the coin is determined to be a true coin, a signal is applied to a gate driver circuit 20 in order to operate the accept gate 4 (Figure 1) so as to allow the coin to follow the accept path A. Also, the microprocessor 17 provides an output on line 21, comprising a credit code indicating the denomination of the coin. The determination of the validity of coins on the basis of signals from sense coils is well known in the art and, accordingly, will not be described again here in detail. The operation of the coin diameter determining funαion, according to a first embodiment, will now be described with reference to Figures 4a to 4e. In this embodiment, the upstream and downstream beams U£) are spaced by the diameter of the coin or token to be identified by the validator. Referring to Figure 4a, a coin 25, entering the passageway 2 (Figure 1), first intercepts the upstream beam U. Unless the thickness of the coin corresponds to the depth b of the passageway 2, the beam U will not be fully blocked. However, there will be, in any event, a significant reduαion in the light intensity deteαed by the photosensor 8 (Figure 1). Therefore, the output of the photosensor 8 is compared with a reference to determine whether the received light intensity has reduced, indicating an incursion into the upstream beam U by a coin. If an incursion is deteαed, the state of signal x, changes. This change in state is not important for coin diameter determination but may conveniently be used as a wake up signal for the microprocessor 17 (Figure 3). Referring to Figure 4b, as the coin 25 continues to fall down the passageway 2, it continues to block the upstream beam, at least partially, and the state of signal x_ is maintained. Referring to Figure 4c, if the coin 25 is of the desired type, it intercepts the downstream beam D just as it is leaving the upstream beam U. This results in virtually simultaneous changes in the states of the signals x. and x 2 . In other words, t_ = t 2 . In praαice, t- may not exaαly equal t 2 due to component tolerances or environmental faαors such as temperature. Thus, when the microprocessor 17 (Figure 3) deteαs that either x_ has returned to its original state or that x 2 has changed state to indicate the presence of a coin, it waits to see if the other signal makes the appropriate change of state within a predetermined window. If the other signal makes the appropriate change of state during the window, and induαive test data, derived from the coils 12 (Figure 1), is in agreement, the microprocessor 17 (Figure 3) sends a signal to the gate drive circuit 20 (Figure 3) to open the accept gate 4 (Figure 1). Figures 4d and 4e show the coin 25 leaving the sensor stations 4. It will be appreciated that further downstream beams could be added, spaced from the upstream beam by the diameters of other coins or tokens, so that a plurality of types of coin or token could be identified. A second embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to Figures 3, 5, 6a to 6e and 7a to 7d, wherein like parts have the same reference signs as in Figures 1 and 2. Referring to Figure 5, the struαure of the validator is substantially the same as that of Figures 1 and 2. However, the accept gate is now located in another unit (not shown). As a result there is a larger drop between the sensor stations 3 and the accept gate, giving more time for the validity of a coin to s be established. The eleαronic circuitry for this validator is as shown in Figure 3. However, the EEPROM 19 will store a different program for the microprocessor, refleαing the different validation method. Referring to Figure 6a, a coin 25, entering the passageway 2 (Figure 1), first o intercepts the upstream beam U. When the incursion is deteαed, the state of signal x_ changes. This change in state is not important for coin diameter determination but may conveniently be used as a wake up signal for the microprocessor 17. s Referring to Figure 6b, as the coin continues to fall down the passageway 2, it continues to block the upstream beam U, at least partially, and the state of signal x_ is maintained. Referring to Figure 6c, when the coin 25 leaves the upstream beam U, signal 0 x, returns to its original value. This change of state is noted by the microprocessor 17 which stores a value t, , representing the timing of the event. Shortly thereafter, the coin intercepts the downstream beam D, causing a change in state of signal x 2 . This change of state is also noted by the microprocessor 17 which stores a value t 2 representing the timing of the event. S Referring to Figure 6d, as the coin continues to fall down the passageway 2, it continues to block the downstream beam D, at least partially, and the state of signal x 2 is maintained. 0 Referring to Figure 6e, as the coin leaves the downstream beam D, the signal x 2 returns to its original state. This change of state is noted by the microprocessor 17 which stores a value t 3 representing the timing of the event. Thus, after a coin has passed both beams U, D, the microprocessor 17 has three values t l5 t 2 and t 3 from which to derive a value indicative of the diameter of the coin. If it is assumed that the velocity « of the coin through the sensing beams U,D, is constant, the distance s travelled by a coin in a given time is given by the formula: s ** - * ut V Since the distance s s between the beams is know and the time taken for the coin to travel that distance is known, i.e. the time between the coin leaving the upstream beam and the coin leaving the downstream beam, the velocity of the coin can be calculated. Thus, from (1): U = - (2) t Substituting s s for s and the measured times for t gives: u = ^— P) ( - ) Now, the upstream beam U is lef when the coin has travelled a distance s c and the downstream beam is intercepted when the coin has travelled s 0 + s s - d, where d is the diameter of the coin. Thus, from (2) and (3) above: s n = - — * t * • ;, W (t 3 - ) and + s - d * (V ( ~ ) Subtraαing (4) from (5) gives: s ~ d = — ^— * (t 2 - t j ) (6) \ τ 3 ^ι> Since s s is a constant, only pj ( - ) need be calculated in order to charaαerise a coin by its diameter. Referring to Figures 7a to 7d, it can be seen that the coin 25 intercepts the downstream beam D before it clears the upstream beam U. This means that t 2 is before t t . Although this produces a negative result when (7) is evaluated, no problem arises because, as can be seen from (6), the negative sign merely indicates that the diameter of the coin is greater than the spacing between the beams. Therefore, the result of the evaluation of (7) for a large coin still charaαerises the coin by its diameter. A third embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to Figures 8, 9, 10, lla to lie and 12a to 12h, wherein like parts have the same reference signs as in Figures 1 to 7. Referring to Figures 8 and 9, a further downstream optical sensor station, comprising a LED 30, a slit 31 and a photosensor 32, is provided. Referring to Figure 10, the eleαronic circuitry is substantially the same as that of the first embodiment, described above, the main differences being in the program stored in the EEPROM 19. However, the LED driving circuitry 15 is adapted to drive three LEDs 5,7,30, and the photosensor interface circuitry 16 is adapted to process the signals from three photosensors 6,8,31 and output an additional signal x The operation of the validator shown in Figures 8 and 9 will now be described. However, the details of the tests relying on the coils will be omitted as suitable techniques are well known in the art. Referring to Figure lla, a coin 25, entering the passageway 2 (Figure 8), first intercepts the upstream beam U. When the incursion is deteαed, the state of signal x_ changes. This change in state is not important for coin diameter determination but may conveniently be used as a wake up signal for the microprocessor 17. Referring to Figure lib, as the coin 25 continues to fall down the passageway 2, it continues to block the upstream beam U, at least partially, and the state of signal x, is maintained until the coin 25 leaves the upstream beam U, when signal x, returns to its original value. This change of state is noted by the microprocessor 17 which stores a value t- representing the timing of the event. Shortly thereafter, the coin intercepts the first downstream beam Dl, causing a change in state of signal x 2 . This change of state is also noted by the microprocessor 17 which stores a value t 2 representing the timing of the event. Referring to Figure 1 lc, as the coin continues to fall down the passageway 2, it continues to block the first downstream beam Dl, at least partially, and the state of signal x 2 is maintained. Next, the coin 25 intercepts the second downstream beam D2, causing a change in state of signal x This change of state is noted by the microprocessor 17 which stores a value t 3 representing the timing of the event. Finally, referring to Figure lie, as the coin 25 leaves each of the downstream beams D1J 2, the corresponding signals x 2 , x 5 return to their original states. In the second embodiment, described above, the speed correαion is performed on the basis of the timings of the coin 25 leaving the two beams UJ . This has a disadvantage in that it limits the time available, before the coin reaches the accept gate 4, for performing the validation calculations. The present embodiment solves this problem by means of the second downstream beam D2 which enables the coin's speed to be determined earlier because the interception of the downstream beams D1,D2 by the leading edge of the coin is deteαed for this purpose. Thus, the speed of a coin can be determined before it has past the second downstream beam D2. Now, since the speed correαion is based upon the time taken for the leading 5 edge of the coin to travel the distance s sl between the downstream beams D1JD2, equation (6) above becomes: s " " d = t t Ssl t _ * {t 2 ~ ) or s so + s a - d * Ssl * (t 3 - tj) (V where s s0 is the distance between the upstream beam U and the first downstream beam Dl. 0 Thus, since s s0 and s sl are constants, a coin can be charaαerised on the basis of its diameter by evaluating: ) or (t 3 ~ ) (9) (t 3 ~ t 2 ) (t 3 ~ t 2 ) Referring to Figures 12a to 12h, it can be seen that t 2 occurs before t If the first form of (9) is used a negative result will be obtained. However, as with s the case of a large coin in a validator according to the second embodiment, the negative sign does not effeα the validity of the charaαerisation of the coin by its diameter. An advantage of the above-described embodiments is that the beams can be 0 position such that for coin of interest, the processing means receives all the timing information within a window which is short compared with the time required for a coin to fall through the sensor stations. The coils 12, employed in the validators of Figures 1, 2, 5, 8 and 9, will now s be described in detail. Referring to Figure 13, a coil 12 comprises an elongate, I-seαion former 42 about which the winding 43 is wound. The former 42 is formed from a high permeability material such as sintered ferrite or iron bonded in a polymer, for example 91% oxidised iron bonded in a polymer. Thus, the former 42, if it is non-conduαing, can serve both as a core and as a bobbin onto which the winding 43 is wound direαly. An eleαromagnetic shield 44 comprises an elongate member having a flange extending perpendicularly at each end. The shield 44 is arranged to be o attached to the coil 12 such that the winding 43 is wholly covered along one long side of the former 42 by the elongate member and at least partially covered at the ends of the former 42. The purpose of the shield 44 is to increase the Q of the coil 12 but also reduces both the susceptibility of the coil 40,41 to eleαromagnetic interference (EMI) and the eleαromagnetic s energy emanating from the coil, other than into the coin passageway 2 (Figure 1) of the validator. Referring to Figure 14, when a coil 12 is energized, a magnetic field 45 is projeαed into the coin passageway 2, between primarily the upper and lower 0 cross-pieces of the I-seαion former 42. A coin 25 passing along the passageway 2 interaαs with the projeαed magnetic field 45 varying the apparent impedance of the coil 12. In the foregoing embodiments of the present invention, the diameter of a coin S is determined by the optical sensor stations as described above. At the same time, one or more of the coils 12 are energized as set out in out our European patent application publication no. 0 599 844. The effeαs of the coin 25 interaαing with the magnetic field 45 are deteαed by the coil interface circuitry 18 which outputs signals x 3 , x 4 to the microprocessor 17. 0 The microprocessor 17 then determines whether the coin under test is valid on the basis of the signals x } , x 2 , x 5 generated by the optical sensing process and the signals x 3 , x 4 generated by the induαive sensing process. If the coin is valid the microprocessor 17 sends a signal to the gate driver 20 to cause the accept gate 4 to open. 5 The microprocessor 17 carries out a validation process on the basis of the signals x ; , x ? x 3 , x 4 under the control of a program, stored in an EEPROM 19. If as a result of the validation processes performed by the microprocessor 17, the coin is determined to be a true coin, a signal is applied to a gate driver o circuit 20 in order to operate the accept gate 4 (Figure 1) so as to allow the coin to follow the accept path A. Also, the microprocessor 17 provides an output on line 21, comprising a credit code indicating the denomination of the coin. s Referring to Figures 1, 5 and 8, refleαive strips 100 are provided on the walls of the passageway 2 between each of the LEDs 6,9,30 and the corresponding photosensors 8,11,32. The refleαive strips 100 increase the light intensity at the photosensors 8,11,32 in the absence of a coin by reducing the amount of light absorbed by the walls of the passageway. As a result, the reduαion in 0 light intensity at the photosensors 8,11,32, due to the passage of a coin, is more profound than would be the case without the refleαive strips 100. This makes it easier to deteα accurately the edges of passing coins. The refleαive strips 100 also solve the problem of the LEDs 6,9,30 not s direαing light direαly across the coin passageway, making the apparatus much less sensitive to the orientation of the LEDs 6,9,30 and the direαion in which light is aαually emitted therefrom. In the absence of the refleαive strips 100, misaligned LEDs result in regions of the passageway 2 which are not illuminated. If a coin passes through one of these regions, it will not affeα 0 the light intensity at the relevant photosensor 8,11,32. The refleαive strips 100 may be, for example, painted onto the walls of the passageway 2 with metallic paint or formed from metal foil stuck to the walls of the passageway 2. A fourth embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to Figures 15 and 16, wherein like parts have the same reference signs as in Figures 1 and 2. Since, the coils, described above with reference to Figures 13 and 14, are narrow in the direαion of coin travel, it is possible to fit a plurality of them along the upper part of the coin passageway 2a. Consequently, it is possible to use coils, substantially as described, as sensors for determining the diameter of a coin under test. Referring to Figure 15, a validator is substantially as described with reference to Figure 8. However, the coils 12 and the optical sensor stations have been replaced by three coil pairs 50,51,52, (one coil of each pair not shown) located at positions corresponding to those of the optical sensor stations shown in Figure 8. Referring to Figure 16, a coil interface circuit 18 energizes the coil pairs 50,51,52 and processes the apparent impedance changes, caused by a passing coin, to produce six signals y,, y^ y v y p y v y 6 . The signals y^ y y 6 are conventional coin charaαeristic data signals and are fed to a microprocessor 17 for determination of coin charaαeristic such as material and thickness. The coil interface circuit 18 includes comparators for comparing the outputs of, at least, one coil 50,51,52 of each pair with a threshold. As a coin passes each of the coil pairs 50,51,52, the amplitude of the respeαive coil signal first falls and then rises. As these signals cross the threshold, the outputs of the respeαive comparators change state, producing pulse signals which are similar to those shown in Figures 11 and 12. A diameter value for the coin can then be determined according to equation (9) above. However, as the coil signals depend on the material, and sometimes the thickness of the coin, the diameter value is for an apparent, or "eleαromagnetic", diameter. For instance, a tin coin will appear to have a smaller "eleαromagnetic" diameter than a similarly sized coin made from ferromagnetic material. Nevertheless, the apparent diameter determined using equation (9) above will differ for differently sized coins of the same material. In addition to monitoring the passage of coins into the validator, the signals from the coil pairs 50,51,52 are simultaneously used to derive additional information about a coin under test, including the nature of the material of the coin. For instance, one pair of coils may be driven in-phase and another in anti-phase or one coil pair could be switched between in-phase and anti¬ phase configurations. Once the nature of the material is known, it is possible to correα the "eleαromagnetic" diameter to derive the coin's physical diameter. However, in praαice this is not necessary because, for each coin to be accepted, the validator could store sets of data defining values indicative of valid coins. The stored data would include data representative of coin material thickness, and also the "eleαromagnetic" width. Thus, it is not necessary to determine the aαual physical diameter of a coin under test but only the "eleαromagnetic" diameter for comparison with a value established empirically. A fifth embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to Figures 17, 18 and 19, wherein like parts have the same reference signs as in Figures 1,2 and 15. Referring to Figure 17, the validator is substantially the same as that shown in Figure 15 but with the lowest coil omitted. The circuit arrangement (Figure 18) of this embodiment is similar to that shown in Figure 16. However, as there are only two coils there are only two conventional coin charaαeristic signal lines y y 5 . Three diameter determining signal lines y_, y p y 3 are retained but signal y 3 is derived differently and the operation of the microprocessor 17 altered in consequence. The derivation of the signals y p y^ y 3 will now be described with reference to Figure 19. As a coin passes the upper coil 50, the amplitude of the respeαive coil signal rises to a peak and then falls again. The coil interface circuit 18 compares the signal for the upper coil 50 with a first threshold THI and outputs a pulse signal y_ when the coil signal is over the threshold THI. The microprocessor 17 deteαs the falling edge of the pulse signal y, and stores the time t As the coin passes the lower coil 51, the amplitude of the respeαive coil signal rises to a peak and then falls again. The coil interface circuit 18 compares the signal with both the first threshold THI and a second higher o threshold 77 2. A pulse signal y 2 is output when the coil signal is over the first threshold THI and a pulse signal y 3 when the coil signal is over the second threshold 77J2. As described above, the time difference t 2 ■ t_ is dependent on the diameter of s a coin under test but in order to obtain a meaningful value, a correαion must be made to take account of the velocity of the coin. In the present embodiment, the coin's velocity is derived from the time difference t 3 ■ t 2 . This time difference depends on the peak coil signal which is indicative of the material from which the coin is formed. However, the peak coil signal is 0 available as part of the conventional induαive testing and can be used to seleα a predetermined correαion faαor. It should be borne in mind that correαion faαors are required only where the materials and/or thickness indicates that the coin may be acceptable. S Another sensor, suitable for use in place of the optical and induαive sensors used in the foregoing embodiments, will now be described with reference to Figures 20 and 21. Referring to Figure 20, a sensor comprises a flap 55 extending across the depth 0 b of the upper part 2a of the coin passageway from the back wall thereof. The flap 55 also extends across the full width of the upper part 2a of the coin passageway. The flap 55 is pivotably mounted to the back wall of the coin passageway by a pair of spaced light leaf springs 56,57. A piezo-eleαric film 58 extends from the flap 55 to the back wall of the coin passageway between the leaf springs 56,57. The film 58 may be polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) sold by AMP under the trade mark K nar * . Referring to Figure 21, as a coin 25 travels down the coin passageway it hits the flap 55 causing it to pivot downwardly against the leaf springs. The pivoting of the flap 55 stresses the piezo-eleαric film 58 which generates an eleαrical signal. This eleαric signal continues to be produced as long as the flap 55 is displaced from its rest position. Once the coin 25 has passed the flap 55, the leaf springs return it to its rest position, relieving the stress in the piezo-eleαric film 58 and terminating the eleαric signal. It will be appreciated that the duration of the eleαric signal produced by the piezo-eleαric film 58 will be dependent on the coin diameter, the speed of the coin and the length of the flap 55, perpendicular to the back wall of the coin passageway. Consequently, the equations given above will need to be modified to take this into account. However, since the length of the flap is known, the necessary modifications will be readily apparent to the skilled person. A modification whereby the depth of the coin passageway can be varied will now be described with reference to Figure 22, wherein like parts have the same reference signs as in Figures 1 and 2. Referring to Figure 22, the element 60 forming the back wall of the coin passageway 2 is provided with a pair of vertical slots 61,62. One slot 61,62 is provided on each side of the upper portion 2a of the coin passageway 2. Since, the element 60 is formed of plastics material, the back wall of the upper portion 2a of the passageway 2 is able to bend to and fro about a line joining the bottoms of the slots 61,62. A cam 63 is mounted behind the element 60 and bears against the back wall of the passageway 2. The cam 63 can be rotated which causes the back wall of the upper passageway portion 2a to be moved to and fro (as indicated by the double headed arrow in Figure 22), thereby altering the depth b (as indicated in Figure 2) of the upper portion 2a. The bearing surface of the cam 63 is formed as a plurality a elongate flats so that the cam 63 will not be turned by a force applied to the back wall of the upper passageway portion 2a. In use, the cam 63 is rotated into a position which sets the depth b of the upper passageway portion 2a to be appropriate for the coins for which the validator is designed. Thereafter, the cam 63 is not moved unless the validator is to be used with a different coin set. In the embodiment shown in Figure 19, the coil 12 is mounted to the moveable part of the element 60 and is dimensioned such that it does not extend beyond the slots 61,62. This means that the coil 12 is kept as close as is possible to coins travelling through the passageway 2 whatever the position of the cam 63. In the interests of clarity, only the optical, induαive and piezo-eleαric sensors particular to the present invention have been described. However, the skilled person will appreciate that additional sensors and/or anti-fraud devices, of which many are known in the art, could be used in addition to the sensors described above.

Claims: Claims 1. A coin validation apparatus comprising means (6,9;50,51) defining first and second reference positions (U, D; Dl) spaced along a coin path (2), sensor means (8,11;50,51) for deteαing a trailing point on a coin (5) passing the first reference position and a leading point on the coin reaching the second reference, and processing means (17) for checking the diameter of a coin under test on the basis of said trailing point passing the first reference position and said leading point reaching the second reference position, characterized in that the processing means checks the diameter of the coin under test without reference to said leading point reaching the first reference position. 2. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the reference positions are separated by the diameter of a coin type to be accepted by the validator. 3. An apparatus according to claim 2, including means defining a third reference position downstream of the first reference position by the diameter of a further coin type to be accepted by the validator and further sensor means for deteαing a leading point on the coin reaching the third reference, wherein the processing means is responsive to the further sensor means to produce a charaαerising signal for a coin under test on the basis of the time difference between the trailing point on the coin passing the first reference position and said leading point reaching the third reference position. 4. An apparatus according to claim 1, including means (17) to determine a velocity dependent value for a coin passing the reference positions, wherein the processing means (17) is further responsive to the velocity dependent value for a coin under test to check the diameter of a coin under test. 5. An apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the means to determine a velocity dependent value compri"£J means to determine the time elapsing between the trailing point passing the first reference position and the trailing point passing the second reference position. 6. An apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the means to determine a velocity dependent value comprises means (30;52) to define a third reference position (D2) downstream of the first reference position and sensor means (32;52) for deteαing said leading point reaching the third reference position, wherein the processing means is responsive to said sensor means (32;52) to derive said velocity dependent value on the basis of the time difference between said leading point reaching the second reference position and said leading point reaching the third reference position. 7. An apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the processing means produces the charaαerising signal on the basis of the result of: ft; - ) (t 3 ~ ) where: t j is the time of trailing point passing the upper first reference position, and t 2 and t 3 are the times of the leading point reaching the second and third reference positions. 8. An apparatus according to any preceding claim, wherein said trailing and leading points are located substantially on the circumference of a coin. 9. An apparatus according to any preceding claim, wherein the sensor means (8,11,32) comprises a beam of optical radiation crossing the coin path and a deteαor (8,11,32) therefore for each said reference position. 10. An apparatus according to claim 9, including refleαive means (100) associated with walls of the coin path for ensuring the beam is present throughout the depth of the path where said beam crosses the coin path. 11. An apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the refleαive means is a strip parallel to said beam. 12. An apparatus according to claim 9 or 10, wherein the refleαive means s comprises a layer of refleαive paint. 13. An apparatus according to claim 9 or 10, wherein the refleαive means comprises a metallic film. o 14. An apparatus according to any one of claims 9 to 13, wherein the coin path has a breadth (b) to accommodate the thickness of a coin under test, a width (w) to accommodate the coin's diameter, and a length along which coins under test can pass edgewise, wherein the sensor means (8,11,32) includes emitter means (6,9,30) on one side of the passageway for direαing said beams s of optical radiation across the width of the passageway, and the deteαors are opposite respeαive emitter means . 15. An apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the sensor means comprises induαive sensors (50,51,52). 16. An apparatus according to claim 15, wherein the coin path has a breadth (b) to accommodate the thickness of a coin under test, a width (w) to accommodate the coin's diameter, and a length along which coins under test can pass edgewise, wherein the sensor means includes an elongate induαor (12) arranged substantially parallel to the width direαion of the path. 17. An apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the sensor means comprises a piezo-eleαric element (58) associated with each reference position, the piezo-eleαric elements being arranged to be stressed by the passage of a coin to produce eleαric signals. 18. An apparatus according to claim 17, wherein at least one of the piezo- eleαric elements comprises a flap (55), arranged to stress a piezo-eleαric film as it is displaced by a passing coin. 19. A coin validation apparatus comprising means defining a passageway (2) for coins under test, the passageway having a breadth (b) to accommodate the thickness of a coin under test, a width (w) to accommodate the coin's diameter, and a length along which coins under test can pass edgewise, and an induαive coin sensing station including a coil assembly (12) beside the passageway and arranged to induαively couple with a major face of a coin therein, characterized in that the coil assembly is arranged such that the magnetic field produced thereby is substantially constant across the width of the passageway. 20. An apparatus according claim 19, wherein the induαive coin sensing station comprises first and second coils (12) opposite each other across the breadth of the passageway. 21. An apparatus according to claim 19 or 20, wherein the or each coil is wound in the form of an elongate oval or reαangle. 22. An apparatus according to claim 21, wherein the or each coil includes an elongate I-seαion former (42). 23. An apparatus according to any one of claims 19 to 22, including shielding means (44) to magnetically shield portions of the or each coil not immediately adjacent the passageway. 24. A coin validation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 18 and any one of claims 19 to 23. 25. A coin validation apparatus according to claim 24, wherein the induαive coin sensing station is located between the first reference position and the second reference position. 26. A method of validating a coin comprising the steps of: (a) moving a coin (5) edgewise past first and second reference positions (U, D; Dl), the reference positions being fixed relative to each other; and (b) determining the time difference between a trailing point on the coin passing the first reference position and a leading point on the coin reaching the second reference; characterized by (c) checking the diameter of the coin on the basis of said time difference without reference to said leading point reaching the first reference position. 27. A method according to claim 26, including the step of producing a coin velocity dependent value, wherein said velocity dependent value is used to check the diameter of the coin. 28. A method according to claim 27, comprising the steps of: (d) moving a coin edgewise past a third reference position (D2); (e) determining the time difference between said leading point reaching the second reference position and said leading point reaching the fourth reference; (f) deriving a value representative of the coin's velocity on the basis of said time difference. 29. A method according to any one of claims 26 to 28, wherein optical sensing means (9,11) is used to deteα a trailing point on the coin's circumference passing the first reference position and a leading point on the coin's circumference reaching the second reference. 30. A method according to any one of claims 26 to 29, wherein induαive sensing means (50,51,52) are used for determining said time difference or differences. 31. A coin validating apparatus comprising a coin path (2) having a breadth (b) sufficient to accommodate the thickness of a coin under test, wherein a wall (62), defining in part said breadth, is repositionable to thereby vary said breadth. 32. An apparatus according to claim 31, including a cam (63) arranged to aα on said wall for repositioning thereof. 33. An apparatus according to claim 31 or 32, wherein a sense coil (12) is mounted to said wall for sensing a coin moving along the coin path.

Inventors: BELL MALCOLM REGINALD HALLAS, WOOD DENNIS, BELL, MALCOLM, REGINALD, HALLAS, WOOD, DENNIS
Applicants: BELL MALCOLM REGINALD HALLAS, COIN CONTROLS, WOOD DENNIS, BELL, MALCOLM, REGINALD, HALLAS, COIN CONTROLS LTD., WOOD, DENNIS
Application year: 1996
Main classification: G07D5
IPC codes: G07D5