ROCKET WITH LATTICE CONTROL SURFACES

Abstract: The group of inventions pertains to rocket technology, in particular guided rockets, and can be used in various types and classes of rocket with lattice control surfaces, and in the rocket control surfaces. The rocket is of a standard aerodynamic design and comprises a body (1) with a motor assembly, a guidance and control system apparatus, fixed wings (2) and movable lattice control surfaces (3) of a control system, said control surfaces being spaced evenly on the outer body along the latter's longitudinal axis. In the reinforcement frame, side members (18, 19) are designed so as to narrow towards the end region of the control surface; the root surface (22) is broader than the end surface (23), the thickness of the lattice planes (24, 25) narrowing either continuously or in steps towards the end region.

Description: Field of Art The invention relates to field of rocket technology, in particular to guided rockets, and can be used for various types and classes of rockets with lattice control surfaces; the invention concerns also a lattice control surface and can be used in gears of control drives. Prior Art of the Invention The rocket is known made of a standard aerodynamic design, containing a propulsion system located in the body and control and guidance apparatus, fixed wings and lattice control surfaces of the control system, located on the body in regular intervals around its centerline and have lifting surfaces formed by the planes. This rocket with a different degree of disclosure was described in the following journals: "FLIGHT INTERNATIONAL" on March 4-10, 1992, N4308, page 24...25; "FLIGHT INTERNATIONAL" on March 11-17, 1992, N4309. page 15 and the most completely in the journal "KRYL'YA RODYNY" (in Russian), N8-93 (Colour picture and page 26). Fulfillment of the rocket with lattice control surfaces allows to use small-sized and little energy consuming drives in control systems, that provides decrease mass and dimensional characteristics of a rocket as a whole. At present lattice control surfaces of various shapes and different design are used in the executive gears of rockets of different kinds and purposes. One of the basic characteristics of a lattice control surface in distinction from a monoplane is the following. In a monoplane design the load-carrying components are located under the covering and do not participate in aerodynamic forces creation. In a lattice control surface the load-carrying components are in a flow and, hence, forms the lifting area of the control surface, i.e. the elements of a lattice control surface perform a double role - both load-carrying design and aerodynamic surface. A consequence of it is the fact, that the lifting force (lift) of a lattice control surface is by several times higher than the lift of a monoplane control surface at equal volumes. A possibility to decrease a lattice control surface volume, in comparison with volume of a monoplane one, results in essential reduction of a drag force (drag) from the oncoming flow, since the lattice control surface actually represents a thin-walled truss, having, alongside with other positive features, advantages in comparison with a monoplane design in rigidity and weight parameters. The lattice control surface of the rocket with arrangement of the lattice planes at angle of 45° to the frame is known (so-called cellular design), (see B.M.Belotserkovsky, L.A.Odnovol etc.; Reschetchatye Kryl'ya; Moscow, "Mashinostroeniye". 1985 (in Russian), page 300, Fig. 12.2, B). The noted lattice control surface contains a load-carrying frame of the rectangular shape, including side bars, root and tip planes and units of attachment of the control surface to the control drive shaft, and the set of the planes with various thickness located inside the frame, forming a lattice as honeycomb. Various thickness of the planes is provided by strengthening of some planes within the limits of the surface scope. Jointing of the planes in a lattice is made by a standard technology by means of counter slots with the subsequent soldering. The blanks of the planes are made with wedge-shaped sharpening at front and rear edges (see the same source, pages 216...223). The advantages of the above specified control surface are determined by general advantages of lattice control surfaces in comparison with conventional monoplane control surfaces. At the same time, the design of the known lattice control surface has a number of disadvantages, including: In the design of the lattice panel (that is formed by the load-carrying frame and the lattice itself) the strengthened planes along the span of a control surface results in relative increase of a drag force for the given control surface; On the lattice of the control surface in places of the planes sharpening in a front part not soldered areas of slots are remained. On some modes of flight it can result to a "shock wave" appearance in the not soldered areas, that will increase drag of a control surface, will lower its total lift and will cause local overheating of the planes, i.e. will decrease their strength and as a result will affect the parameters of the rocket flight; Location of the attachment units of the control surfaces with the rocket at corners of the load-carrying frame results, when the lattice control surface is used as the controlled one, to increase of overall dimensions of an output element of the drive, protruding in a flow, i.e. to increase of its drag and weakens the body of the rocket in this area, reducing a possibility "to dip" this output link into the body; Necessity of slots making in blanks of the thin lattice planes results in complication of the control surface manufacturing technology: necessity of blanks piling, milling or punching of slots in a die, trimming of burrs in slots and at sharp edges, fixing of the planes at soldering etc.; Introduction into design of the lattice of the strengthened planes along the span of the control surface causes a necessity of making slots of various width in blanks of the planes of a lattice and in various areas of the planes, that significantly complicates and increase cost of the technological process of the planes manufacturing. The analysis of above-stated drawbacks shows that they essentially reduce operational and design characteristics of the known lattice control surfaces and manufacturability of their production, and in some extent limit the possibilities of its use. Disclosure of the Invention The purpose of the invention is improvement of the rocket with lattice control surfaces. At inventing there was a task to develop the rocket for all angles of approach of high manoeuvrability, possessing high aerodynamic characteristics, not losing its manoeuvrable properties. Design features of the rocket and its lattice control surfaces thus should not decrease significantly a factor of a normal force and increase of a drag coefficient . At developing of the rocket and the lattice control surface design it was necessary to create a design having a complex of the following properties: reduced drag, higher manufacturability (in comparison with the known designs), increased weight response, allowing to improve geometrical characteristics of the rocket, its power, dynamics etc. The task of the invention was also to provide deployment of the lattice control surfaces and their fixing in the unfolded position at launch of a rocket by creating special gears, that provides high flying-tactical characteristics, and also minimum overall dimensions at transportation and storage of rockets. Alongside with providing of folding - deployment of control surfaces usage of the invention allows to increase reliability of control surfaces fixation in folded and unfolded positions. The specified technical result is reached by that the rocket with a standard aerodynamic design, contains the propulsion system located in its body, the instrumentation of the control and guidance systems, and also the fixed wings and the movable lattice control surfaces of a control system, located on the body in regular intervals relatively to its centerline and have lifting surfaces, formed by the planes, thus the wings, the lattice control surfaces and the body are made with the following ratios of the dimensions: S w =2S w /S M = 3...11; S p = 2S p /S M = 1.5...3; H p /L p = 0.3...0.55; t p = t/b = 0.6...1; n = H p /t + 1 = 3...5; S p = nL p b; λ w = L 2 /2S w = 0.2...0.5; λ k = L k /D eq = 16...20; D eq = 4S M /π Where: S w - Area of wing; S w - Specific area of wing; S p - Specific area of lattice control surface; S M - Mid-section area of rocket; H p - Height of lattice control surface; S p - Area of lifting surface of lattice control surface; L p - Span of lattice control surface; λ w - Wing elongation: L - Span of wing: λ k - Rocket body elongation: L k - Rocket length: t - Pitch of planes of lattice control surface; D eq - Diameter of circle, area of which equals mid-section area of rocket; b - Width of lattice control surface plane; t p - Specific pitch of lattice control surface planes; n - Number of planes of lattice control surface. The rocket has gears for the control surfaces deployment and their fixation in unfolded and folded positions, and also the pyrotechnic accumulator of pressure for the gear of the control surfaces deployment, thus the lattice control surfaces are supplied by pins with grooves for fixation of the control surfaces in a folded position. In the body of the rocket apertures for the pins of the control surfaces are made, and in the root part of the control surfaces assembly apertures are made. Thus each control surface deployment gear is made as a pneumocylinder, located in the body of the rocket, chamber under piston which is connected with the pyrotechnic accumulator of pressure, and the piston is loaded by a spring for its fixation in its end position at unfolded state of the control surface, and rod, fixed in the front part of the end of the shaft of the control surface drive and located by its ends in the correspondent assembly apertures of the root part of the control surface. Each gear of the control surface fixation in the unfolded position is made as rods loaded by a spring, located in a rear part of the end of the shaft of the control surface drive with a capability of interaction with the appropriate assembly apertures in the root part of the control surface. And each gear of the control surface fixation in the folded position is made as clamping scissors, located in the body of the deployment gear with capability of interaction with the pins of the control surfaces in their folded position and with the rods of the pneumocylinders pistons in the unfolded position. The rods are of a length, ensuring their capability to block the apertures of the rocket body at the unfolded position of control surfaces. Such fulfillment of the rocket provides synchronism of the specified above gears functioning and protection from dust and water at unfolded and folded positions of the control surfaces. For providing of an optimum force and travel of the deployment gear and eliminating of torque relatively the rigid fixing of the end of the drive shaft the pin of each control surface is mounted on one of the lattice control surface planes' intersections in area of its centre of weights. To avoid damage of the rocket body coating and planes of the lattice control surfaces in a folded position, each pin of them is of a length, ensuring a gap between the rocket body and the appropriate control surface. Protection from dust and water of the rocket body is provided because the rods of each pneumocylinder piston have a groove for its fixation by the clamping scissors at the unfolded position of the control surfaces. For this purpose the lattice control surface of the rocket contains a load-carrying frame of rectangular shape, including side bars, root and tip planes and units of attachment of the control surface to the drive shaft, and a set of planes of various thickness located inside the frame, forming a lattice like a honeycomb. To solve a task of creation of a lattice control surface design, having along with reduced drag, an increased manufacturability, high weight response, in the claimed invention a number of the interconnected design solutions is implemented. Side bars of the frame are made with smooth reduction of thickness, their root and tip planes are made with different thickness, decreasing along the span of the control surface from its root to tip, the planes of the lattice are made with smooth or discrete reduction of thickness, decreasing at length of the plane from root to tip along the span of the control surface. Taking into account that the tip components of the control surface practically are loaded in flight less than the root ones, such design solution allows by means of their narrowing to reduce a drag of the control surface as a whole. At the same time weight of the specified design elements and weight of the control surface is also reduced as a whole, that increases weight response of the design, reduces a moment of inertia of the control surface relatively to its longitudinal and lateral axes and, as a result, increases the dynamic parameters of the drive and the rocket as a whole. The planes of the lattice are formed by jointing of a certain number of W-shaped plates of various thickness from row to row, smoothly or discretely narrowing at span of the control surface to its tip portion, resting by the ends upon internal surfaces of the lateral frame bars, and the envisioned direct lines, drawn through initial ledges apices of each row of W-shaped plates are parallel the root plane of the frame. At such construction a design-technological task of shaping of the narrowing plane thickness along the span from a root to a tip portion of the control surface is solved. Walls of the W-shaped plate, installed on the root surface plane, are continued by the plate of the following row installed on it and so on, and thickness of walls of the following rows is decreased smoothly or discretely. Therefore the complex planes of the lattice are formed having decreasing thickness along its length from the root to the tip portion of the plane smoothly or discretely. As a consequence of the control surface of thickness decrease to the tip portion along span of the planes, drag of a control surface is reduces. The offered lattice control surface have base areas in the interfaced apexes of the W-shaped plates in places of contacting among themselves. It enables to install the W-shaped plates «row upon another row» through the previously made base areas, by initial technological welding a row to a row by dot or condenser welding, by forming technological "cellular block". Thus the walls of the W-shaped plates of one row can be adjusted in the unified inclined plane with the walls of the upper rows, possible displacement of components of each plane is reduced to the minimum, that results to reduction of drag of the control surface. In the claimed lattice control surface the W-shaped plates are jointed among themselves and to the frame forming single-piece design by welding or soldering. Continuing an idea of easy W-shaped plates joint, technological "cellular block" can be complemented by the root and tip planes. At this the "cellular block" may be mechanically processed for accuracy increase at interfaced dimensions with side bars of the frame. Then single-piece jointing of load-carrying elements of the control surface among themselves is performed by welding (for example by laser) or by soldering into a unified load-carrying unit. Into the specified load-carrying unit a load-carrying bracket is included. Such arrangement of the technological process of the surface assembly results to reduction down to the minimum value of a technological scrap, influencing on such parameters, as increased drag of the lattice control surface owing to deviations of the geometrical dimensions of the control surface elements from their computed values, reduction of constructional rigidity of the panel owing to not sufficient soldering in jointing of a surface elements, that can take place, for example, in the known control surfaces at soldering of the planes jointed "slot into slot", strength of assembly, etc. In a claimed control surface the planes of the lattice, the frames and side bars are made with wedge-shaped sharpening of front and rear edges. As is known from theory, drag of a lattice control surface consists of friction drag and wave-making drag, and the value of wave-making drag is in direct proportion to the shape of a detail structure located in flow. Thus sharpening of a detail (details) structure (structures) reduces wave-making drag. It is performed for the listed details. In the claimed control surface sharpening of edges of the lattice planes is made symmetrical. As follows from the above-stated, sharpening of a detail structure, including the symmetrical sharpening, reduces wave-making drag of a detail. In this case this detail is plane. But the advantages of the planes sharpening are not only the above indicated. The neighbouring planes, locating from each other at computational distance (pitch of the lattice "t"), influence each other through a shock wave, coming from the front edge of the neighbouring plane and falling on its rear edge. The more is this influence, the more is angle of attack for the plane α. The mutual influence is determined for the planes of symmetrical profile by thickness of the plane and wedge-shaped sharpening of front and rear edges with angle 2. It may be concluded from the said above that for reduction of the control surface planes drag depending on implementation conditions it is necessary to make bilaterial symmetrical sharpening of the planes. At construction of the control surface lattice with usage of the previously deformed W-shaped plates through the previously formed base areas there is a capability "to finish" the contact area of the next rows of plates by cutting machining, forming in these areas symmetrical sharpening of the planes, reducing thus a capability of a shock wave appearance in areas of the "cellular block" walls crossing, in distinction from the soldered jointing of the planes known as "slot into slot". In the claimed control surface the units of the control surface attachment to the shaft of the control drive are located in the medium part of the root frame plane and are formed by bent members of the frame side bars, jointed among themselves and with the root frame plane by the load-carrying bracket. Arrangement of attachment units of the control surface to the control drive shaft in the medium part of the root plane between bent members of frame side bars allows to reduce overall dimensions of the control surface in the zone of fastening and as a consequence to dip attachment units of the control surface of the control drive shaft "into the body" of the rocket, significantly reducing drag of the root part of the control surface. Bent areas of the frame side bars in the zone of the attachment units make the design more rigid, reducing deformation from loads, that is important for operation of the control drive. Introduction of a load-carrying bracket into this zone, integrating by a force way the frame side bars and the root plane of the control surface into one unit, increases rigidity of the output drive units, that finally increases dynamic properties of the rocket. In the claimed control surface the load-carrying bracket is made of Π-shaped and angle roof-shaped sections, and the legs of the Π-shaped section are connected to the bent members of the frame side bars forming attachment eyes, and the apex of the angle roof-shaped section is connected to the root plane of the frame. In the attachment eyes through apertures are made for the surface attachment to the shaft of the control drive. Except functioning as load-carrying rigid binder of the frame elements (side bars and root plain), load-carrying bracket allows to pass from rather thin design load-carrying elements of the surface to stronger eyes with apertures for attachment of the surface to the control drive shaft. The bracket itself being made of two details, represents the rigid spatial form, that was produced and processed beforehand, that increases manufacturability of assembling process. At use of the rocket according to the invention a defeat of the air targets including high manoeuvrable fighters and attack airplanes in the daytime and at night in simple and difficult meteorological conditions from any directions (omnidirectional) is provided at active informative (jamming) and manoeuvrable counteraction of the enemy. The rocket is capable to strike such specific targets as a cruise missile, rocket "air - air" etc. The rocket with claimed ratios of dimensions allows to place it on the carrier airplane at strict limitations of space and simultaneously to reduce required hinged moment of the control drive allows in few times (approx. in 7 times). That allows to create drives of smaller power and therefore of smaller weight at retention of advantages of lattice control surfaces. The optimum range of parameters is found by results of numerous researches of rockets of various geometry in wind tunnels and is confirmed by results of flight tests. The rocket with the specified ratio of the geometrical dimensions has high aerodynamic characteristics in all range of its application. Maximum angle of attack is α max ≈ 40...45°, maximum permissible transversal g-load equals appr.50 units on passive and on active legs of trajectory due to introduced limitation for hardware. At fall outside the limits of the specified dimension ratios the rocket largely loses the manoeuvrable capabilities due to significant increase of a drag coefficient C x and significant decrease of a normal force factor C y . Thus the dimensions ratio of the rocket being choosen in the specified limits provides its high manoeuvrable characteristics in range of attack angles α max ≈ 40...±45° and values of factor M ≈ 0.6...5,0. The brief description of the drawings The essence of the invention group is explained by graphic materials, where: In Fig.1 - general view of rocket; In Fig.2 - lattice control surface; In Fig.3 - deployment gear in folded position of control surfaces; In Fig.4 - deployment gear in unfolded position of control surfaces; In Fig.5 - general design of lattice control surface with narrowing of lattice planes thickness; In Fig.6 - view E of lattice control surface element, represented in Fig.5; In Fig.7 - view J of lattice control surface element, represented in Fig.5; In Fig.8 - view H of lattice control surface element, represented in Fig.5; In Fig.9 - view K of lattice control surface element, represented in Fig.5; In Fig.10 - cross-section A-A of Fig.5; In Fig.11 - cross-section C-C of Fig.5; In Fig.12 - cross-section B-B of Fig.5; In Fig.13 - cross-section G-G of Fig.5; In Fig.14 - general design of lattice control surface with discret reduction of lattice planes thickness; In Fig.15 - view D at side surface of lattice control surface of Fig.5; In Fig.16 - general view of proposed rocket with unfolded control surfaces; In Fig.17 - cross-section A-A of Fig.16; In Fig.18 - cross-section B-B of Fig.16; In Fig.19 - graphic representation of normal force factor relationship of specific wing area; In Fig.20 - graphic representation of normal force factor relationship of factor M: In Fig.21 - graphic representation of normal force (C y max ) relationship of specific area of lattice control surface; In Fig.22 - graphic representation of drag coefficient of isolated lattice control surface (C x o ) relationship of relation of height of lattice control surface to its span. Variants of the Invention Implementation The rocket with a standard aerodynamic design (Fig.1) contains a body 1 and a propulsion system, a guidance and control system instrumentation (not shown on the drawings) located in it. four fixed wings 2 and four lattice control surfaces 3 of the control system, located on the body 1 in regular spacing around its centerline being in a folded position. The rocket has gears for deployment of control surfaces and their fixation in unfolded and folded positions. Each lattice control surface 3 is connected to the drive by means of the rod 4 (Fig.2), fixed in the front portion of the end 5 of the drive control surface shaft (not shown in drawings). The ends of the rod 4 are located in assembly apertures of a root part of the control surface 3. Rod 4 is a rotation axis of the control surface 3 at its deployment. The gear of the control surface fixation in unfolded position is made as rods 6. located in a back part of the end 5 of the shaft of the control surface drive, pressed by the spring 7. On the ends of rods 6 bevels are made for their penetration into the appropriate assembly apertures of the root part of the control surface 3 after turning it to the end "unfolded" position. The lattice control surfaces 3 are supplied by pins 8 (Fig.2, 3, 4), fixed on the crossed planes 9 of the lattice control surfaces in centres of their weights, used for fixation of control surfaces 3 in a folded position and their moving to an unfolded position. Each gear of the control surface fixation in a folded position is made as clamping scissors, consisting of two pressed by the spring 10 fixing elements 11, located on the axle 12. The clamping scissors are located in the body of the rocket so that to ensure catching and fixing of the pins 8 of the control surfaces 3 in a folded position. Between fixing elements 11 the axle 13 having steps-cams 14 is located. The head of the axle 13 is made with a slot for a tool and is located for access outside of the rocket body (Fig.3, 4). The head of the axle 13 is located between the planes 9 of the lattice control surfaces 3 for easy access of a tool. Each gear of the control surface deployment is made as the pneumocylinder 15, located in the rocket body 1 and of the pin 8 (Fig.3, 4). Chamber under the piston of the pneumocylinder 15 is connected to the pyrotechnic accumulator of pressure (not shown on the drawings). The spring 16 serves for fixation of the piston of the pneumocylinder 15 in the end position at deployment of the control surface 3. A rod 17 of the piston of the pneumocylinder 15 serves for pushing of the pin 8 out at deployment of the control surface 3. The pyrotechnic accumulator of pressure may be an explosive device controlled by some method being known. Length of the rod 17 of the pneumocylinder piston provides capability of apertures blocking in the rocket body 1 after escape of pins 8 out of them. Grooves at pins 8 and rods 17 ensure reliable fixation by means of clamping scissors. Length of pins 8 is accepted also for providing the necessary gap γ (Fig.3) between the rocket body 1 and planes of the lattice control surfaces 3 to prevent damage of them. Deployment of the rocket lattice control surfaces 3 is done in an automatic mode at the beginning of autonomous mission, and at periodical technical service also. At launch of the rocket the lattice control surfaces 3 are in a folded position. The propulsion system, and guidance and control systems function by conventional way for this type of rockets. The deployment of lattice control surfaces is made after operation of the pyrotechnic accumulator of pressure with a signal of the control system of the rocket. Under overpressure of gas or air, going into the chamber of the pneumocylinder 15, the rod 17 overcoming an effort of fixation from clamping scissors, pushes out pins 8 of the control surfaces 3. In the pneumocylinder 15 spring 16 and clamping scissors 11 hold the rod 17 of the piston of the pneumocylinder 15 in the end position, at which the tip portion of the rod 17 blocks the aperture in the rocket body 1 after escape the pin 8 out of it, providing necessary protection from dust and water. At deployment the lattice control surface 3 turns round the axis, formed by the rod 4, until the rods 6 under pressure of the spring 7 will not get with their ends in assembly apertures of the root part of the control surface 3, ensuring thus its fixation in an unfolded position. For manual deployment of the lattice control surface 3 it is necessary to turn the head of the axis 13 with a tool until its fixing elements 11 will be separated by steps 14. Thus the rod 17 of the piston of the pneumocylinder 15 under force from the spring 16 will give initial effort to the pin 8 for turning the lattice control surface 3. Its subsequent movement (turn) is done manually until its fixation in an unfolded position by the described above method. To move the lattice control surfaces 3 into a folded position it is necessary to push the rods 6 into the aperture of the clamper, overcoming resistance of the spring 7, then to turn the control surface 3 until adjustment of the pin 8 with the appropriate aperture in the rocket body 1 and with the necessary force, overcoming resistance of the spring 16, to press on the rod 17 of the piston of the pneumocylinder and to push it down under the surface. Thus the fixing elements 11 of the clamping scissors will be separated, releasing the rod 17 of the piston, and will capture a groove of the pin 8, fixing it. In this position the lattice control surface 3 is kept for transportation, storage and joint flight of the rocket with the carrier. Functionally the lattice control surface of the rocket represents a carrier system, consisting of large number of planes of a restricted span with the small size of a chord, and actually being a thin-walled truss, i.e. represents a rather light and rigid design. The basis of the design is a load-carrying frame, consisting of two symmetrical (mirror-reflected) side bars 19 (see Fig.5), with figured bent members 20 and 21 in their root portion, made of a steel sheet, root 22 and tip 23 planes, made also of a steel sheet, jointed as a one-piece part. The side bars, root and tip planes are made with sharpening of their edges (see Fig.10, 12), and thickness of the lateral part decreases to the end of the control surface. Inside the frame a square-diagonal set of thin-walled previously deformed W-shaped plates is located, being installed «row upon another row». The first row of the set is put on the root plane 22, and the last row contacts the tip plane 23 by a single-piece joint. The W-shaped plates are in contact with side bars 18 and 19, being connected with them as a one-piece part. The W-shaped plates have base areas in places of contact among themselves, through which they are connected as one-piece part. The specified W-shaped plates are installed on the root plane and against each other in such a manner that the envisioned direct lines, drawn through initial ledges apices of each row of W-shaped plates are parallel the root plane ofthe frame. Since in blanks of a wall the W-shaped plates will form a 90° apex, two planes, for example 24 and 25 (see Fig.5) will form a square honeycomb cell with a pitch "t". Thickness of planes in the given example are decreased smoothly with some step from the value δ 1 to the value δ i··1 (for the planes 24 and 25) etc. up to the last row. The root and tip planes 22 and 23 have fixed thickness δ 1 and δ 2 .The W-shaped plates are made with symmetrical wedge-shaped sharpening at angle 2 in blanks (see Fig.11). In Fig.14 an alternative with two discrete values of thickness of the planes δ 3 and δ 4 is shown. Thus thickness of the root and tip planes are as they are in Fig.5. δ 1 and δ 2 . The load-carrying chain of the control surface is locked in the root part with the load-carrying bracket 26 (see Fig.5), made previously as one-piece joint from Π-shaped and angle roof-shaped sections, processed previously at fixing areas and jointed with bent members of side bars 18 and 19 (see Fig.5). As it was already indicated above, a cellular unit of the lattice control surface consisting of few W-shaped plates, root 22 and tip 23 planes, for convenience of technology may be assembled previously by means of one-piece jointing, for example, by electrostatic or spot welding, processed at fixing areas that are in contact with side bars 18 and 19 (see Fig.5), at area of W-shaped plates jointing in a zone of base areas (sharpening of edges), together with a load-carrying bracket 26 installed in the side bars 18 and 19 and assembled finally by one-piece jointing, for example, by welding or soldering at contact areas (see Fig.6, 7, 8, 9). Then through apertures ⊘d, ⊘D and dimension "E" for attachment of the control surface to the control drive shaft are made in the eyes. At the same time in the obtained modular design finishing operations are carried out: removal of flashes at sharpened edges of side bars and planes. It is necessary to note, that for drag reduction of the design (shifting of a shock wave in higher range of flight speeds) a taper 27 is made (see Fig.15) at front sharpened edge of side bars 18 and 19 (see Fig.5), simultaneously protecting the front sharpened ends of the lattice planes from damage. For the same purpose the rear edge 28 of the side bars 18 and 19 is removed from the back sharpened ends of the lattice planes at distance "k" (see Fig.15). Width of the lattice planes is "b" (see Fig. 15). The claimed lattice control surface of a rocket works as follows. At appearance of a running-on flow of air, interacting to the lattice control surface under some angle of attack α to the surface of the planes, the lifting area of the lattice control surface made of the rectangular planes, will create lift on the surface. Lift, arising on the lattice control surface, being transferred by a load-carrying design of the control surface through units of attachment (eyes with apertures - Fig.13) on the control drive axis, generally creates hinge moment M h , loading the drive. The planes of the lattice control surfaces (see Fig.5, 11) are profiled by appropriate selection of a pitch "t" (for the control surface), thickness δ i , sharpening angles 2 of front and rear edges, allow to obtain smooth flow-around up to angles of attack 40...50°, that significantly increases dynamic characteristics of a rocket. At supersonic speeds of flight the planes of a lattice may be located rather close to each other without their mutual influence through a shock wave and to obtain large total area of a lattice aerodynamic surface in small volume, i.e. to improve a manoeuvrability of a rocket. For example, at M=4 lift of a lattice surface approximately by 3 times exceeds lift of an appropriate monoplane wing at equal volumes, that in certain conditions gives to lattice control surfaces a number of advantages in comparison with conventional monoplane control surfaces. As lattice control surface, as it was already mentioned above, represents a thin-walled truss (i.e. light and strong design), and the ratio of thickness of the planes and frame components can be expressed in some cases by relation 1:20, it results in high level of material operating ratio M.O.R., which is within limits from 0,5 up to 0,9. This factor is calculated under the formula: M.O.R. = G / N. Where: G - mass of product, N - norm of material consumption. However it is necessary to note, that drag acting to a design placed in flow at flight can considerably reduce the effect of a lattice control surface implementation. Proceeding from it, in the claimed design of a lattice control surface almost all known ways of drag reduction are used. Contouring (decreasing of thickness at span) for side bars and sharpening of their front and rear edges; Contouring (selection of thickness and sharpening angle) for root and tip planes, lattice planes; Creation of "cellular blocks" assembly technology for a control surface lattice through base areas of beforehand deformed W-shaped plates; Making a root part of a lattice control surface more rigid through placing its attachment units closer to each other and introduction of a special bracket for decrease of possible deformation in flight; Formation of attachment units for a control surface to a control drive shaft, allowing to dip a root part of a lattice control surface into a body of a rocket. The listed measures of a rocket lattice control surface perfection allow to ensure smoother (without separation) flow-around of a lattice control surface, i.e. lower aerodynamic drag, that allows along with a rocket to solve problem of the necessary rocket and control drive characteristics ensuring in a more flexible way. including such as geometrical characteristics of a rocket, dynamic properties, power, moment of inertia of the drive executive component etc. The shape of a lattice control surface, used in a system of a rocket aerodynamic control directly influences such factors, as capability of its folding in an "initial" condition along a rocket body, capability of its deployment in flight only under action of constant aerodynamic forces, capability of the hinge drive moment reduction etc. The efficiency of the claimed invention, as design studies of a complex "lattice control surface - control drive - rocket" have shown, is in actual capability of the above-stated integrated problems solution in all range of a rocket implementation, including angles of attack up to 40...50°. The claimed rocket (see Fig.16) contains the body 1, including the forward fairing 29 of ogival shape. Inside the body 1 apparatus of the guidance and control systems are located, and also the propulsion system (not shown on the drawings). The rocket is designed under a standard aerodynamic design, in accordance with it four wings 2 on the body 1 in its central part and four lattice control surfaces 3 in the tail part are located. Wings 2 and control surfaces 3 are located on the body 1 in regular intervals around its centerline. There are the eyes 30 in the root part of the control surface 3, by each of them the control surface fastens to the control drive shaft. For improvement of the aerodynamic characteristics of a rocket the following ratios of the rocket body 1, its wings 2 and control surfaces 3 the following dimension ratios are chosen, namely: S w = 2S w /S M =3...11; S p =2S p /S M =1.5...3...; H p /L p =0.3...0.55; t p =t/b=0.6...1; n=H p /t+1=3...5; S p = nL p b: λ w = L 2 /2S w = 0.2...0.5; λ k = L k /D eq = 16...20; D eq = 4S M /π Where: S w - Area of wing; S w - Specific area of wing; S p - Specific area of lattice control surface; S M - Mid-section area of rocket; H p - Height of lattice control surface; S p - Area of lifting surface of lattice control surface; L p - Span of lattice control surface; λ w - Wing elongation; L - Span of wing; λ k - Rocket body elongation; L k - Rocket length; t - Pitch of planes of lattice control surface; D eq - Diameter of circle, area of which equals mid-section area of rocket. b - Width of lattice control surface plane; t p - Specific pitch of lattice control surface planes; n - Number of planes of lattice control surface. An alternative of a rocket design is the variant, at which the rocket has the following parameters within the specified above ratios for these parameters: S w = 51; S p =2.2; H p /L p = 0.45; t p = 0.9; n = 4; λ w = 0.305; λ k = 18 These parameters ratios provide one of possible optimum versions of a rocket creation and allow it to keep drag and normal force coefficients within certain limits, and by that high manoeuvrable properties. A rockets with wings of small length, providing small transversal overall dimensions, are intended for manoeuvring at large angles of attack. From the aerodynamics point of view, such configurations have the following distinctive features: Presence of cross connections; Presence of large local angles of attack at control surfaces. Selection of lattice control surfaces, wings and rocket body dimension ratios within certain limits allows to reduce or to eliminate a number of technical problems (or some part of these problems). Manoeuvring at large angles of attack (α ≈ 40°) allows to ensure a high level of transversal g-loads in all range of a rocket implementation. As it is known, the value of transversal g-load is proportional to normal force value of a rocket, which is determined under the formula: Y = C y q S, where: C y - factor of rocket normal force: q - velocity head, [kg/m 2 ]; S - characteristic dimension, [m 2 ]. The value of a rocket flight range is inverse proportional to a rocket drag force, which is calculated under the formula: X = C x q S , where C x - drag coefficient of rocket. In Fig. 19-22 relations for C x , C y depending on claimed parameters of a rocket and lattice control surface are adduced. The rocket with the claimed ratios of dimensions provides the highest manoeuvrable characteristics at minimum of a drag coefficient. The presented parameters (shaded areas) are determined as a result of systematic researches in wind tunnels for rockets of various geometrical dimensions and are confirmed by results of flight tests. At falling outside the limits of the claimed parameters a rocket largely loses the manoeuvrable properties due to significant decrease of a normal force factor and increase of a drag coefficient. Thus, the rocket with the claimed ratios of dimensions provides high aerodynamic characteristics in all range of its implementation, maximum permissible g-load is n ymax ≈ 50 at angles of attack α max ≈ 40...45°. The graphic relations in Fig.19-22 confirm capability of the high aerodynamic characteristics obtaining in an interval of dimension ratio values for wings, lattice control surfaces and rocket body that was made as a standard aerodynamic design.

Claims: A rocket with lattice control surfaces, containing a propulsion system located in a body (1), apparatus of control and guidance systems, fixed wings (2) and lattice control surfaces (3) of a control system, located on a body (1) in regular intervals around its centerline and having lifting surfaces formed by planes (9), characterized in that wings (2), lattice control surfaces (3) of a guidance system and body (1) are made in such a manner that they have the following dimension ratios: S w = 2S W /S M = 3∼11; S p = 2S p /S M = 1.5∼3; H p /L p = 0.3∼0.55; t p = t/b = 0.6∼1; n = H p /t + 1 = 3∼5; S p = nL p b; λ w = L 2 /2S W = 0.2∼0.5; λ k = L k /D eq = 16∼20; D eq = 4S M /π Where: S w - Area of wing; S w - Specific area of wing; S p - Specific area of lattice control surface; S M - Mid-section area of rocket; H p - Height of lattice control surface; S p - Area of lifting surface of lattice control surface; L p - Span of lattice control surface; λ w - Wing elongation; L - Span of wing; λ k - Rocket body elongation; L k - Rocket length; t - Pitch of planes of lattice control surface; D eq - Diameter of circle, area of which equals mid-section area of rocket; b - Width of lattice control surface plane; t p - Specific pitch of lattice control surface planes; n - Number of planes of lattice control surface. A rocket with lattice control surfaces in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that it has gears for deployment of control surfaces and their fixation in unfolded and folded positions, a pyrotechnic accumulator of pressure for a gear of control surfaces deployment, thus lattice control surfaces (3) are supplied by pins (8) with grooves for fixation of control surfaces (3) in a folded position, in a rocket body (1) apertures for control surface pins (8) are made, and in a root part of control surfaces (3) assembly apertures are made, thus each control surface deployment gear is made as a pneumocylinder (15) located in a rocket body (1), chamber under piston of which is connected with a pyrotechnic accumulator of pressure, and a piston is loaded by a spring (16) for its fixation in its end position at deployment of a control surface (3), and a rod (4), fixed in a front part of an end (5) of a shaft of a control surface drive and located by its ends in a correspondent assembly apertures of a root part of a control surface (3); each gear of a control surface fixation in an unfolded position is made as rods (6) loaded by a spring (7), located in rear part of an end (5) of a shaft of a control surface drive with capability of interaction with appropriate assembly apertures in a root part of a control surface (3), and each gear of a control surface fixation in a folded position is made as clamping scissors (11), loaded by a spring (10), installed at an axle (12) in a rocket body (1) with capability of interaction with pins (8) of control surfaces (3) in their folded position and with rods (17) of pistons of pneumocylinders (15) in an unfolded position of control surfaces (3); and rods (17) are made of length, ensuring their capability to block apertures of a rocket body (1) at an unfolded position of control surfaces (3). A rocket in accordance with claim 2, characterized in that a pin (8) of each control surface (3) is mounted on crossed planes (9) of appropriate lattice control surface (3) in area of its weights centre. A rocket in accordance with claim 3, characterized in that a pin (8) of each control surface (3) is made of length providing formation of a gap between a body (1) of a rocket and appropriate lattice control surface (3). A rocket in accordance with claim 2, characterized in that a rod (17) of a piston of each pneumocylinder (15) has a groove for its fixation by clamping scissors (11) at an unfolded position of lattice control surfaces (3). A rocket in accordance with claim 1, wherein a lattice control surface of which contains a load-carrying frame of a rectangular shape, including side bars (18, 19), root (22) and tip (23) planes and units of attachment of the lattice control surface (3) to a drive shaft, and a set of planes (24, 25) of different thickness located inside a frame, forming a lattice as honeycomb, characterized in that side bars (18, 19) of a frame are made with smooth decreasing of thickness, its root (22) and tip (23) planes are made of different thicknesses, narrowing along a control surface span from its root to tip portion; planes (24, 25) of a lattices are made with smooth or discrete reduction of thickness, narrowing at length of a plane from root to tip portion along span of a control surface. A rocket in accordance with claim 6, characterized in that planes of a lattice are formed by jointing of rows of previously deformed W-shaped plates of various thickness from row to row, smoothly or discretely narrowing along span of a control surface to its tip portion, resting by ends at internal surfaces of side bars (18, 19) of a frame, and a envisioned direct lines, drawn through initial apexes of ledges for each row of W-figurative plates, are parallel to a root (22) plane of a frame. A rocket in accordance with claim 7, characterized in that conjugated apexes of W-figurative plates in areas of contact among themselves have base areas. A rocket in accordance with claims 7, 8 characterized in that W-figurative plates are jointed among themselves and to a frame as a single-piece detail by welding or soldering. A rocket in accordance with claims 6, 7 characterized in that planes (24, 25) of a lattice, planes (22, 23) and side bars (18, 19) of a frame are made with wedge-shaped sharpening of front and rear edges. A rocket in accordance with claim 10 characterized in that sharpening of edges of planes (24, 25) of a lattice are made symmetrical. A rocket in accordance with claim 6 characterized in that units of a control surface attachment to a drive shaft are located in a medium part of a root (22) plane of a frame and are formed by bent members (20, 21) of side bars (18, 19) of a frame, jointed among themselves and with a root plane (22) of a frame by a load-carrying bracket (26). A rocket in accordance with claim 12 characterized in that a load-carrying bracket (26) is made by jointing of Π-shaped and angle roof-shaped sections, and legs of a Π-shaped section are connected to bent members (20, 21) of frame side bars (18, 19) forming attachment eyes, and an apex of an angle roof-shaped section is connected to a root plane of a frame, and through apertures are made for a control surface (3) attachment to a shaft of a control drive.

Inventors: BELYAEV VLADIMIR NIKOLAEVICH, BOGATSKY VLADIMIR GRIGORIEVICH, BYCHKOV EUGENY ALEXANDROVICH, DREER DANIIL LEONIDOVICH, EMELYANOV VLADIMIR PETROVICH, FETISOV VADIM KONSTANTINOVICH, GRACHEV ALEXEI VIKTOROVICH, ILIIN ALEXEI MIKHAILOVICH, ISCHENKO VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVIC, KRYACHKOV MIKHAIL ANATOLIEVICH, LERNER LAZAR IOSIFOVICH, LEVISCHEV OLEG NIKOLAEVICH, MALOLETNEV NIKOLAI AFANASIEVIC, PAVLOV VLADIMIR IVANOVICH, PIRYAZEV VIKTOR FEDOROVICH, PUSTOVOITOV VADIM ANDRIANOVICH, REIDEL ANATOLY LVOVICH, SCHMUGLYAKOV SERGEI LVOVICH, SOKOLOVSKY GENNADY ALEXANDROVI, VATOLIN VALENTIN VLADIMIROVICH, BELYAEV, VLADIMIR NIKOLAEVICH, BOGATSKY, VLADIMIR GRIGORIEVICH, BYCHKOV, EUGENY ALEXANDROVICH, DREER, DANIIL LEONIDOVICH, EMELYANOV, VLADIMIR PETROVICH, FETISOV, VADIM KONSTANTINOVICH, GRACHEV, ALEXEI VIKTOROVICH, ILIIN, ALEXEI MIKHAILOVICH, ISCHENKO, VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVICH, KRYACHKOV, MIKHAIL ANATOLIEVICH, LERNER, LAZAR IOSIFOVICH, LEVISCHEV, OLEG NIKOLAEVICH, MALOLETNEV, NIKOLAI AFANASIEVICH, PAVLOV, VLADIMIR IVANOVICH, PIRYAZEV, VIKTOR FEDOROVICH, PUSTOVOITOV, VADIM ANDRIANOVICH, REIDEL, ANATOLY LVOVICH, SCHMUGLYAKOV, SERGEI LVOVICH, SOKOLOVSKY, GENNADY ALEXANDROVICH, VATOLIN, VALENTIN VLADIMIROVICH
Applicants: VYMPEL STATE MACHINE BUILDING, VYMPEL STATE MACHINE BUILDING DESIGN BUREAU (GOSMKB "VYMPEL")
Application year: 1996
Main classification: B64C3
IPC codes: B64C3, F42B10