POSITIONING SYSTEM WITH DIFFERENTIATED COMPLIANT ANCHORING

Abstract: The invention relates to a positioning system using anchoring of the ship which allows it to move in order to better accommodate variations in the environment, avoiding fully parallel situations (in which the ship is fully head on to the weather) and the situation in which it is fully crosswise (athwart to the weather), based on the distribution and setting-up of mooring lines which define differentiated degrees of rigidity (compliance) in the anchoring system.

Description: POSITIONING SVST€M WITH DIFF€R€NTIRT€D COMPLIANT ANCHORING FI€LD OF TH€ INV€NTION Owing to the discovery of oil-producing fields in increasingly deep ωater, it has become necessary to develop production systems capable of operating efficiently at these neiυ ωater depths and with low installation and maintenance costs. The present invention applies to ocean terminals wherever an oil tanker may need to be positioned in order to receive production from offshore oil fields. The positioning system of the present invention allows the oil tanker, anchored according to the concept proposed herein, to move in order better to accommodate variations in the environment. PRIOR BUT Ocean terminals operating in Brazil today are responsible for discharging 30% of national oil production. In the best-known production system, three principal types of ocean terminals are used; namely: - a buoy frame, a monobυoy and an anchoring flame. With the buoy-frame system, a petroleum vessel (tanker) is moored by means of cables to 6 or 7 buoys whidi are andtoredto the sea bed. This ship receives me oil produced on the platform, through floating flexible piping. Since the system operates offshore, it is subject to environmental conditions, which requires that safety regulations be rigorously observed. For example, the ship and the platform must be positioned side-by-side in relation to the ocean currents so mat if the hawsers of one of them break the ship does not collide with the platform or vice-versa. When mis petroleum vessel is full, a second (relief) boat is moored alongside the first, to two of its mooring buoys, and is kept in position by two tugboats, while the oil contained in the first oil tanks is transferred to the relief boat through flexible piping connecting the two vessels. The drawback of this system is diat die piping dansferring and/or discharging the production oil is subject to environmental conditions, since both die ship and die p/adbrm are generally severely affected by very bad sea conditions. Consequently, die ship drifts a great deal, which makes it essential to use floating flexible piping capable of moving widi die ship when it is offset from its initial position. fl further drawback is diat, if diis piping breaks, all die oil will be spilled into the sea. Besides die financial loss caused by de stoppage in production, serious environmental damage may occur. The monobuoy-type system consists of a floating cylindrical body anchored to the sea bed by 6-8 mooring lines, diis cylindrical body comprising a fixed lower part where de production line (riser) arrives, and a movable upper part where there is a turntable. The petroleum vessel is moored to dis cylindrical body by means of cables. The turntable is provided widi a system of bearings which allows die ship, even while moored to de monobυoy, to turn drough 360° around die monobυoy. The underwater lines from die pladbrms arrive at die ship via de sea bed, from which rises a flexible line (riser) supported by a buoy connected hermetically to de monobυoy. In the monobυoy dere is a 'swivel' device which converts axial (vertical) flow into radial (horizontal) flow, allowing production to be discharged to die ship. This transfer is carried out widi die aid of a flexible hose. The drawback of this system is dat die swivel which is responsible for die hermetic sealing of de flow is very expensive to maintain since it requires production to be able to be stopped in die event of a breakdown so diat die swivel can be replaced. The andorin-flame system is considered to be an improvement over die bυoy- frame system since in mis case die ship is itself anchored to die sea bed. The advantage of mis system is diat die ship is better secured and die risk of an offset is therefore reduced, dυs making it possible for an underwater line to reach die ship. €ven so, the influence of sea conditions is quite substantial. More recently a system known as the 'turret" system has been developed in whim a monobυoy is mounted in die tanker, the monobυoy possessing various levels of concendic seals and working at high pressures. This system also makes it possible for the ship to turn diroυgh 360° but, because of die complexity of die system, die tanker would have to be brought into dry dock in de event of a breakdown or damage to the monobυoy. OBJ€CT OF TH€ INVENTION It is an object of die present invention to provide a system which solves die problems mentioned above widi efficiency, a low initial cost, safety, a simplified installation, and reduced maintenance and high reliability. It is another object of die present invention to provide a positioning system using andioring of die ship, based on die disdibυtion and setting-up of mooring lines which define differentiated degrees of rigidity in die anchoring system. The system should allow die ship to move in order better to accommodate variations in de environment, avoiding fully parallel situations (head on to the weader) and die situation in which it is fully crosswise (adiwart to die weadier). SUMMRRV OF TH€ INV€NTION According to die present invention there is provided a positioning system using andioring widi differentiated compliance (as herein defined) consisting ofapladbrm, or other recovery means, and a petroleum vessel into which it is intended to discharge the production of an offshore oilfield, said positioning system being characterized in that the tanker is anchored so that die mooring lines comprise chains and/or cables; and in diat die elasticity and/or geometry of me lines is varied so as to allow the ends of die ship to move so dat it can accommodate variations in sea conditions. D€TRH€D DESCRIPTION OF TH€ INV€NTION The present invention is based on a novel concept, which we refer to herein as differentiated compliance, (developed from parametric studies using commercially available software and which has been consolidated in full-scale dials). In die present study, dials were conducted at die Caravela field, located in die Santos Basin (Brazil), with a water depth of approximately 200 metres, fls regards safety, all die regulations required when operating widi a buoy-frame system were observed, widi only one "off station' incident probable per year due to adverse weather conditions. It was confirmed in practice diat anchoring lines comprising a mixed system (chains alternating widi steel wires or cables) give die system greater rigidity dian andioring lines comprising only chains. This means diat, if die same tension is applied to diese lines, a line comprising a mixed system of chains and cables will be displaced horizontally over a shorter distance than a line comprising only chains, even though me chain lines are heavier. On the basis of mis observation, the ship positioning system according to die present invention comprises die provision of anchoring lines consisting of a mixed system of chains and cables. The immediate consequence of using this system is diat die ship is able to "accommodate' variations in sea conditions. Because one of die ends of die ship is diυs able to move, die ship can turn sufficiently to accommodate new sea conditions and is not drawn out of position by me sea. The degree of freedom of movement is a function of me combined effort of its anchoring lines, and of varying die elasticity and/or geometry of its anchoring lines. Various tests were planned to study die behaviour of die presently proposed mooring system when subjected to adverse environmental conditions, such as wind, waves and ocean currents, and to evaluate the sdesses produced in diese mooring lines. To select die tests, a numerical simulation was performed widi die aim of establishing die most suitable coefficients for use in computer programs so as to allow extrapolation and prediction ofthe behaviour of die proposed system under different environmental conditions, at different depths of water, and widi different types of vessels. The modeling data were obtained from tests performed in a test tank measuring eighty metres long by fifty medes wide, widi variable depth, adjustable from 0to 9 various types, amplitudes and directions, as well as simulating winds and current channels of various types. Water depths in die range 190 to 1000 medes were simulated in die tests, with scale models of vessels having die correct ballast and weight disdibution to obtain the correct mass, cende of gravity, and turning radius appropriate for die loading conditions established. The modeling of die mooring lines, obeying standardized criteria for diis type of system, took die following parameters into account: (a) depdi of water; (b) lengdi and configuration of die mooring lines; (c) weight ofthe submerged line per unit lengdi; (d) mechanical elasticity of die lines; (e) dragging force of die lines per unit lengdi; (f) coefficient of friction over die sea bed; (g) level of pre-tensioning in die line. Various configurations of mooring lines were tested widi differentiated levelling between stem and bow. These tests were able to confirm die influence of variation of the water depdi on die mooring system, showing diat, even if die mooring line is damaged, the variation in transient motion observed is small owing to die small amount of damping offered by die system. The majority of die tests were performed so diat die hundred-year wave reached die vessel under die most adverse conditions (between 90 and 180 degrees). Under die test conditions established, it was observed diat horizontal offsets of die area where die risers are connected to the vessel were less than 25% of die depdi of water, and die maximum tension in die line did not exceed 75% of breaking load. This proves diat, for die σiteria of displacement and sdess, die system is viable and satisfactory. The following tables show some of die results of me dials performed. RU the tests were performe 'under hundred-yea wave conditions, widi variations in die depdi of die water, the type of vessel, and die configuration of die mooring lines. TRβL€(l) Depdi 195 300 500 700 1000 (m) Type of vessel 28000 X (tonnes) 135000 X X X X X Configuration single 8 (no. of lines) double 8 mixed (*) 16 16 16 (*) system consisting of chain + cable + chain The influence of various types of waves on die configurations adopted for die mooring lines was also studied. Breakage or damage to die line was also simulated, as was offset of die point of connection of die ship to die production lines (risers) already installed. In die first battery of tests die vessel had a displacement of 135000 tones, 300 medes In height. For small yaw waves, various tests covered die use of 15 mooring lines of which 5 were double and 3 single, grouped into three sectors each containing 5 lines. For large yaw waves tests covered die use of 15 mooring lines of which 4 were double and 7 single, widi 6 pairs on the bow widi a 60 degrees spacing between die lines of a pair. In die second battery of tests, a test witiioυt computer simulation was performed with the aim of obtaining information for die proposed anchoring system. The tests used a system of six points widi double lines, widi two lines on die bow at 90° and 270 widi pre-tenslon T, and two lines on the stern at 45° , 135 ° , 225 ° and 315 °, all widi die same pre-tenslon T. The tensions T and T were varied during die tests. Similar systems were also tested for vessels with displacements of 280000 tonnes and water depdis of 390 and 700 metres, widi large yaw and small yaw waves, and for die larger depdis die mooring system was configured widi 15 lines, of which 6 were double and 3 single. The great advantage of mis system is diat, by simply applying diis concept, a reduction in investment costs of approximately 30% can be achieved. Having taken account of die depdi of die water and die tonnage of die ship, the system can advantageously replace other established systems, such as die andioring frame, monobυoy and even die turret, since It does not require die use of a swivel, diereby also drastically reducing maintenance costs and offering die advantage of using a less complex system. fl further advantage is diat diis novel concept involves die application of all die materials and operating mediods used worldwide for established systems, and die usual σiteria sum as safety and operating standards, which removes die need to use new tools. Like all die conventional systems, die system now proposed also has limitations. Its applicability will be determined by a technical and economic viability study specific to die location, in which water depdi and die tonnage of die tanker will be the principal variables. Bearing in mind diat the tonnage of die ship is dictated by the production capacity of die field, and the water depdi is diat ofthe location of die field, we can state with certainty on die basis of our experimental studies, and with die aid of properly checked software, whedier die anchoring system widi differentiated compliance may or may not be applied in each specific case. Our studies indicate diat compliance differentiation works better die deeper the water, i.e. die greater die chances of stern bow displacement of die ship, which makes diis system a highly competitive alternative both technically and economically.

Claims: CLRIMS 7. fl positioning system using anchoring widi differentiated compliance (as herein defined) consisting of a platform, or odier recovery means, and a petroleum vessel into which it is intended to disdiarge die production of an offshore oilfield, said positioning system being characterized in that die tanker is anchored so that the mooring lines comprise drains and/or cables; and in diat die elasticity and/or geometry of the lines is varied so as to allow die ends of die ship to move so diat it can accommodate variations in sea conditions. 2. fl positioning system accotding to claim 1, characterized in diat die degree of freedom of stembow displacement is a function of die configuration adopted for die anchoring lines. 3. fl positioning system according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in diat die applicability of die system is a function of die depdi of die water and of die tonnage of die ship.

Inventors: DE BARROS MAURICIO SEBASTIAO S, KASTER FERNANDO GUILHERME CAST, DE BARROS, MAURICIO, SEBASTIAO, SAMPAIO, KASTER, FERNANDO, GUILHERME, CASTANHEIRA
Applicants: PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA, PETROLEO BRASILEIRO S.A.- PETROBRAS
Application year: 1996
Main classification: B63B21
IPC codes: B63B21, B63B22