APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR HARVESTING BONE

Abstract: An instrument for harvesting bone comprised of an elongate body (20) having a hollow (32), and a proximal end and a distal end communicating with one another through the hollow. A loop shaped blade (12) having a curved cutting edge (14) adjacent to a curved aperture (16) or cutting or abrading bone is located at the distal end of the instrument. The cut or abraded bone moves through the aperture and into the hollow for storage. The retractable blade provides access to the stored bone for manipulation as needed, and a plunger (24) in the handle advances the bone for placement in the recipient site.

Description: APPARATUSANDMETHODFORHARVESTING BONE The present invention relates to the field of surgery. The invention has particular utility in connection with the removal and collection of bone from the surface of one or more donor sites, and the preparation and placement of the autogenous bone material at a second location in the patient., e.g. for use in grafting bone to osseous deficiencies, such as periodontal and dentoalveolar defects, bone deficiencies around dental implants, and numerous orthopedic applications that require grafting. Many reconstructive procedures used in medicine and dentistry involve the manipulation and healing of bones. Such procedures may involve changes in the position, orientation, shape and size of skeletal structures. A problem that is commonly encountered during such procedures is a lack of bone graft material. Bone graft material may be used in several applications, such as to fill between sections of bone that have been repositioned, to change surface geometry, or to add bone to an area that is deficient, such as in conjunction with periodontal surgery or dental implants in the patients' jaws. The need to harvest small bone grafts from intraoral sites has been common in periodontal surgery to restore bone defects around teeth. In the case of dental implant surgery, bone grafts may be needed to augment atrophic alveolar ridges ofthe maxilla and/or mandible and the sinus floor to increase the dimension of these bone sites to accommodate and totally cover the endosseous portion of implant fixtures. Bone grafts also are used in conjunction with guided tissue regeneration, a technique that uses a membrane to isolate hard tissue from soft tissue sites and potentiate hard tissue healing. Presently, it is often difficult to harvest adequate amounts of autogenous bone from intraoral sites. Therefore, clinicians often rely on non- autogenous sources of graft material, such as bone from cadaver sources (homologous or allogenic grafts), animal sources (heterogenous or xenogeneic grafts), or synthetic bone substitutes. However, healing of non-autogenous material grafts is not as extensive or predictable as healing of autogeneous bone obtained directly from the patient; plus there is the additional cost of such non-autogenous graft materials which can be significant. Clinicians use several techniques to remove bone for grafting for intraoral procedures. In one such technique rotary instruments, such as side cutting burrs or trephines, are used to remove a piece or section of cortical bone from a local intraoral site in the maxilla or mandible. The cortical bone is often morsalized into a particulate form, either manually with a rongeur like instrument or in a bone mill. The particulate bone is then combined with blood to form an osseous coagulum, which is then positioned and packed into the osseous defect around the teeth or implant. See Robinson, R.E. "Osseous Coagulum for Bone Induction", J. Periodontology 40:503(1969). Suction devices with filters have been fabricated and manufactured to collect the bone dust from rotary instruments. See Hutchinson, RA "Utilization of an Osseous Coagulum Collection Filter", J. Periodontology 44:668(1973). See also Goldman, et al, "Periodontal Therapy", pp 994-1005, CN. Mosby Co., (1980); and Haggarty, et al., "Autogeneous Bone Grafts: A Revolution in the Treatment of Vertical Bone Defects", J. Periodontology 42:626(1971). While such techniques are widely used by clinicians, the techniques have limitations, since sites to harvest sections of intraoral bone are limited in number and extent because of limited intraoral access, proximity to tooth roots, nerve structures and sinus cavities, and thin plates of bone. Other techniques for harvesting bone include using chisels or osteotomes to remove and manually collect shavings from the surface. These instruments must be very sharp and the process is often awkward and time consuming. Other manual instruments such as bone files and rasps also remove bone. However, the efficiency of cutting and the ability to use the removed bone is greatly limited. Another technique is to collect bone dust generated by twist drills or taps used to prepare the sites for implant placement. However, much ofthe bone material may be lost while the site is being irrigated to cool the cutting instrument. When larger amounts of bone are needed for major reconstructive procedures, other sites such as the hip (anterior or posterior ilium), tibia, ribs, or the calvarium often are used. However, using such other sites necessitates a second surgical site, which may require postoperative hospitalization, and thus is less amenable, e.g. in the case of an out-patient dental procedure. Various surgical devices have been proposed and/or are in use to harvest bone marrow samples for biopsy or devices such as rongeurs or bone cutters or punches to remove sections or convex edges of bone. Surgical devices also are in use in arthroscopy and endoscopy for cutting or drilling bone or tissue and removing the tissue fragments. Ultrasonic devices to cut bone also are in use; however, such devices require the removal ofthe irrigant and debris liberated by the apparatus. Each of these methods and/or devices, however, suffers from one or more deficiencies as applied to the collection of bone for grafting. Yet other patented devices have been proposed; each of these, however, suffers from one or more deficiencies: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,403,317 and 5,269,785 to Bonutti show a method and apparatus for the percutaneous cutting and removal of tissue fragments from human. The Bonutti device removes the tissue fragments by suction, where it can be collected and then placed elsewhere in the patient from where originally obtained. Bonutti employs a flexible drill, and suction to remove the debris to an externally placed collection reservoir, where it is compressed before being replaced into the patient. U.S. Patent No. 2,526,662 to Hipps discloses a bone meal extractor apparatus for mechanically removing bone meal from a donor bone site through a small percutaneous site using a drill. The drill shavings, which comprise primarily sub-surface bone, are then evacuated into an open cut that the drill passes through, for collection. U.S. Patent No. 4,798,213 to Doppelt teaches a device for obtaining a bone biopsy for diagnosis of various bone diseases. The Doppelt device is intended to remove a core of bone using a tubular drill, while maintaining the architecture ofthe tissue. The sample is obtained from the marrow space and not intended from re-implantation. U.S. Patent No. 5,133,359 to Kedem shows a hard tissue biopsy instrument in which samples are taken using a rotatably driven hollow needle. U.S. Patent No. 4,366,822 to Altshuler discloses a method and apparatus for bone marrow cell separation and analysis. The Altshuler apparatus collects bone marrow cells in a filtration chamber on a filter interposed between a needle directed into the bone marrow site and an aspirator or vacuum source, i.e. using negative pressure to withdrawal marrow cells through a needle. U.S. Patent No. 5,052,411 to Schoolman teaches, a vacuum barrier attachment for shielding the operator of a medical tool from harmful aerosols and blood, etc. created by drilling, sawing types of actions, etc. The Schoolman device requires vacuum and is not intended for harvesting tissue for re-implantation. U.S. Patent No. 4,722,338 to Wright et al discloses a device instrument for removing bone which uses a shearing action similar to a rongeur to cut bone, with means for collecting fragments of bone as they are removed. The Wright et al device reportedly is used mainly for the removal of projections or edges of bone using a shearing mechanism without the intent of harvesting the bone for grafting. U.S. Patent No. 4,994,024 to Falk teaches an arthroscopy hook- clippers device that allow the unobstructed removal of tissue or bone with removal ofthe fragments by suction. The Falk device is intended for arthroscopy applications and with the removal of projections of tissue or bone and not specifically for the harvest of tissue for grafting. Yet other prior art devices are disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,466,429 to Loscher et al and U.S. Patent No. 4,844,064 to Thimsen et al. It is thus a primary object ofthe present invention to provide an improved method and device for removing and harvesting bone or the like, and delivering the bone to a second site, which overcomes the aforesaid and other disadvantages ofthe prior art. A more specific object ofthe present invention is to provide an improved method and device for directly, percutaneously or permucosally removing and collecting bone from one or more donor sites, and for temporarily storing the collected bone and preparing the bone for delivery to a pre-selected recipient site. The invention is directed to a hand-held surgical instrument for the cutting, removal, and storage of bone surface shavings for use as autogenous bone grafts. The instrument is comprised of a blade mounted in a handle for holding and supporting said blade. The blade has a cutting structure adjacent its distal end in the form of a sharpened loop. The loop's wedge shaped cross- section is defined proximally by a perpendicular curved aperture through the blade, and distally by a ground and honed relief. In the preferred form, the handle cooperates to provide a storage space adjacent the distal end ofthe blade for receiving harvested bone from the cutting structure. This manual instrument is held at an acute angle to the bone, and with minimal downward pressure, is drawn across the bone surface to cut and collect a thin shaving of bone. The blade is preferably retractable to allow the clinician access to the harvested material. A plunger is incorporated into the handle to serve both as a locking mechanism to secure the blade and as a means to advance and consolidate the bone in the distal aspect ofthe instrument. Fig. 1 is a perspective view of an associated instrument embodying the invention. Fig. 2 shows side (2B), top (2A, 2E, 2F), bottom (2C), and sectional (2D) views of the handle. Fig. 3. shows side (3B), top (3 A), bottom (3C), and sectional (3D) views ofthe plunger. Fig. 4 shows top (4A), side (4B), and end (4C) view ofthe blade. Fig. 5 shows enlarged top (5 A) and sectional (5B) views ofthe distal (cutting) end ofthe blade. Fig. 6. is a diagrammatic illustration ofthe various angles involved in the cutting operation ofthe blade. Fig. 7. illustrates the use ofthe instrument to collect (7 A), mix (7B) and apply (7C) bone shavings. Figs. 8A-8F show modified versions of handle and bone collection systems. The general arrangement ofthe elements is shown most clearly in Fig. 1. This shows the assembly comprising the blade 12, the cutting edge 14, and aperture 16, a blade tab 18, the handle 20, a plunger 24, a lock button 26, and a plunger tab 28, all of which are discussed in more detail hereinafter. Referring now to Figs. 4, there is shown a construction of a preferred form ofthe blade ofthe invention. This cutting structure is comprised of a loop shaped cutting geometry formed on the distal end ofthe cutting blade 12. The curved structure ofthe preferred embodiment is a semi -circular cutting edge 14 formed by perforating the distal end ofthe blade 12 with a semi- circular hole 16. The back surface ofthe blade, i.e., the surface away from the one adjacent the bone structure, is preferably relieved at 13 between its edges so that the depth ofthe hole adjacent the cutting edge is equal to or less than the width ofthe hole 16. This provides easy transfer ofthe cut bone into the space behind the blade and prevents clogging ofthe hole during the cutting operation. As seen in Fig. 5, the hole 16 in this preferred embodiment is essentially normal to the long dimension ofthe blade so that the inner side of the cutting edge is essentially normal to the face ofthe blade which contacts the bone. A slope 17 cooperates with hole 16 to define cutting edge 14. However, in use the blade is held at a slight angle to the bone 100, hence defined the working angle α w . The working angle ofthe instrument is equivalent to rake angle ofthe cutting edge with respect to the bone at the tip ofthe cutting edge 14, with an effective range of positive rake angles from about 5 - 50 degrees when the blade is mounted in the handle. Novel features ofthe blade allow manual cutting ofthe bone, with several advantages over motorized or pneumatic tools. These advantages include decreased costs, decreased set-up time, and decreased heat generation to optimize bone cell survival. The instrument is easily controlled in comparison to a osteotome or a gouge, where if these instruments disengage from the bone, they lunge into the tissue at the wound borders. With the pulling action of this design as shown as arrow P in Fig. 7 A, it is unlikely that the patient would be harmed ifthe blade inadvertently disengages from the bone. Furthermore, cutting can be carried safely to the boundary of the exposed bone with the blade naturally tracking a straight line without a tendency to veer off. The inner edge ofthe loop at its distal aspect 14 forms a positive rake angle with respect to the bone surface when the distal end is held in contact with, and at an acute angle to the bone. These various angles are illustrated in Fig. 6. Bone is an anisotropic material with varying requirements for cutting based on orientation. The rake angle (α) ofthe blade edge can be modified by the working angle (α w )of the instrument to the bone surface. This allows adjustment ofthe cutting parameters ofthe blade for different bone properties. The Merchant analysis relates the effects of rake angle, depth, and material properties of isotropic materials as a function of a horizontal pulling force (Px) for cutting of a straight blade by: Px = t o b t cos (β- α) / sin φ cos (φ+β-α) where: to _ shear stress at failure on the shear zone ( 16,260 psi) β = friction angle = arc tan μ (37 °) α = tool rake angle (5° - 50 °) φ = shear plane angle (=34° , 2φ + β + α = 90°) b = work piece width (estimate 0.020 in) t = nominal chip thickness (depth of cut, estimate 0.005 in)) μ = friction coefficient between tool face and chip (0.75) Substituting values into the equations with a rake angle of 30 degrees : Px = 16,260 psi • 0.020in • 0.005in • cos (37° - 30°) / sin 34° cos (34°+37 °-30°) = 3.82 lbs This relationship is represented graphically for rake angles from 0-55 degrees as is illustrated in graph A below: Horizontal Force vs. Rake Angle Horiz force (lbs) 10 20 30 40 50 60 Rake Angle (degrees) GRAPH A Theoretical results in comparison to experimental results are of limited agreement because ofthe anisotropic nature of bone. [Jacobs,CH, Pope, MH, Berry, JT, Hoaglund, F. A Study ofthe Bone Machining Process-Orthogonal Cutting J. Biomechanics, 7:131-136 1974] As the working angle ofthe blade's curved loop is increased from zero degrees (full contact ofthe blade loop with the surface), only the point tangent to the loop's edge 14 remains in contact with the bone surface. Now only slight downward force (shown as arrow D) on the instrument is necessary the cause very high pressures at the interface between the blade and the bone. This allows the blade to penetrate and engage the bone and allows the cut to be initiated. In addition, this point contact allows the blade to engage flat, convex, and most concave bone surfaces. In comparison to a straight or flat blade design where contact surface is not influenced by working angle, contact area is large with higher forces required to penetrate and engage the surface. In addition, cutting of concave surfaces is greatly limited. Approximation of the maximum contact pressure(s) between the blade loop and the bone surface can be estimated from one derivation ofthe H. Hertz equations for a cylinder on a flat plate of equal modulus : s = 0.591 li P. E / d^) where P, = load per inch length, E = modulus of elasticity, d cy , = diameter of cylinder. For a 1 lb. load on the blade edge 0.001 in width and 0.25 in dia, and E for bone 2.61 x IO 6 psi : s = 0.591 V [1000 * 2.61 x l0 6 /0.25] = 60,386 psi The modulus of stainless steel is about 10 fold greater than cortical bone, with these contact pressures conservatively less than steel in contact with bone. Cortical bone, with ultimate tensile stress of 20,300 psi , would be indented and engaged by the blade. Contact stress for a range of blade edge thickness are illustrated below in graph B: Edge Width vs Contact Pressure(psi) . Contact Pressure 0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.001 Edge Thickness (in) GRAPH B The blade allows smooth, uniform cutting of bone with minimal chatter. After engagement ofthe blade into the bone surface, its positive rake angle further promotes deeper engagement ofthe blade without increase in normal force. The diving force F d is a function ofthe pulling force parallel to the bone surface F p and the working angle ofthe instrument α w : F d = F p sin( α w ) The diving forces increase with the working angle ofthe instrument. Blade cutting depth reaches equilibrium. This is a function ofthe laterally decreasing rake angle from the central point of contact, the proximal edge 12A ofthe blade at the aperture 16, and a wedging effect caused by medial compression ofthe bone chip as it moves into the circular aperture 16. Geometrically, the aperture width w a and working angle ofthe instrument α w limit the maximum depth ofthe dive d : d = w a sin (α w ) Graphically, with an aperture width of 0.030 in, maximum cutting depth is shown in graph C: Max. Depth vs Working Angle -Depth GRAPH C Anatomic bone surfaces present a terrain of variable contour, with access to these surfaces also limited by adjacent anatomic structures and overlying tissue. The curved loop shaped blade, Fig.5A, provides primary cutting along the longitudinal axis ofthe instrument. With the cutting edge at the distal end ofthe blade, this allows access under tissue flaps to the edge of the elevated periosteum. In addition, the blade can be moved laterally at is distal aspect to cut the bone surface in areas of limited access. Cutting now occurs in the more lateral and proximal positions ofthe loop 19. The blade edge is hardened to approximately 58 Rockwell C (Brinell hardness~600 kg/mm 2 ) to prolong its cutting life. Cortical bone has harness 80 Rockwell M (Brinell hardness ~30 kg/mm 2 ). Hardness can be further enhanced with titanium nitride coating which also decreases the interface friction between the blade and the bone. The hollow grind of the blade relief at 17 allows the edge profile to be thinner while optimizing the blade stiffness with support above the edge. The edge is both ground and honed in a direction peφendicular to the edge to minimize areas of stress concentration that can occur as the blade thins to its edge. Bone shavings 50 pass through the narrow aperture 16 and can be collected for eventual grafting purposes. The aperture is analogous to a one way valve, where the shavings easily pass through in their dense form before their shapes and orientations become randomized. This randomized form of the bone is favorable. It prevents the bone shavings from falling back through the aperture 16 and thus not being available for grafting. It allows the shavings to be collected without the use of vacuum which both desiccates and necroses the bone cells, and potentially contaminates the bone with saliva and soft tissue elements. The bone shavings or chips have favorable properties with respect to their application as autogenous bone grafts. These include an increase in their surface area to volume ratio, an increase in the relative volume of bone, and a porosity that allows incoφoration of blood and encourages vascular ingrowth and cell migration into the graft. The exposed collagen promotes coagulation ofthe blood elements and renders the graft in a favorable "mortar-like" consistency to be packed into the defect sites in the form of an osseous coagulum. As mentioned previously, the distal end ofthe upper aspect ofthe blade incoφorates a central ramp or tapered reduced thickness 13, with the proximal end ofthe ramp decreasing in thickness to where it ends at 12A adjacent the blade aperture 16. This reduced section is shown best in Fig 5B and has the function of providing a very thin blade section 12A immediately adjacent the rear ofthe hole 16. The blade thickness is maintained laterally with a ridge and sidewalls 15 adjacent to the ramp. This allows the blade loop to have the thickness required for strength, while providing a very short path through the aperture 16. This short passage reduces the chances of clogging. The ramp 13 serves several additional functions. It provides an initial storage area for the shavings as they are collected. It provides an increase in the cross-sectional area ofthe reservoir that allows the handles external profile to be reduced in height and thus more accessible to constrained anatomic locations. When the handle for the blade does not incoφorate the storage area (as shown in Fig. 8a), the ramp 13 provides a seat for the bone as it is collected as shown in figs. 8a-b. A small collection chamber, not integral to the handle, can also be attached to the blade's upper surface as shown in Fig 8c. Finally, in concert with the handle chamber geometry, the chamber is designed with increasing cross-sectional area as one moves proximally, encouraging the chips to move into the handle proximally as the bone is collected. The blade is preferably bowed longitudinally to create a spring that provides friction between the blade and the grooves 40 ofthe side wall 30 of the handle 20. This keeps the blade in the desired position until it intentionally needs to be shifted. With the variability in manufacturing, the longitudinal bow geometry allows a relatively large amount of deflection to be used, which makes dimensional variation in production inconsequential. Also, steel , as opposed to the plastic used in the handle, has a predictable modulus of elasticity that will not creep. As seen best in Figs. 1 and 4, at the rear ofthe blade 12 there is provided a blade tab 18 which is adapted to be engaged to a lock button 26 on the end ofthe plunger 24 (see Figs. 1 and 3) which is mounted in the handle 20 proximal ofthe blade 12. The extended length ofthe tab 18 from the cutting edge (as shown in Fig 4A) allows the tab 18 to transmits the raking force from the center ofthe handle where it has sufficient strength. Furthermore, manipulation ofthe blade is controlled safely away from the shaφ edge. Finally, the extended length blade also serves as a 4th moveable wall ofthe collection chamber. This allows for a very compact design capable of being used in tight places and allows easy access to the contents ofthe chamber. As seen best in Figs. 8A-8E, for constrained anatomic sites, the blade may used with just a gripping handle attached to its proximal end. This leaves the upper surface ofthe blade exposed on its mid and distal aspects. This allows the blade access to more constrained anatomic locations and also allows the blade to be bent and offset to optimize its access to more specific anatomic locations. The blade can also be increased in thickness to provide more volume in its central ramped hollow to collect the bone shavings. The details ofthe handle 20 are shown best in Fig. 2 wherein side wall 30 and bottom wall 32 define a u-shaped space 32 as seen best in Fig. 2A. There are two sets of detents, the first set 36 are positioned to engage the tab on the rear end ofthe blade to prevent its moving beyond the end of the handle 20. The second set 38 are positioned to engage the plunger tab 28 on the plunger 24 and retain the plunger in the position shown Fig. 1 with the lock button 26 in engagement with the blade tab. The handle ofthe preferred embodiment serves multiple functions, integrating ergonomic handling and support ofthe blade, a storage compartment or reservoir ofthe collected bone, a site for combining additives as needed, and a means of delivering and dispensing the harvested bone at the recipient site. This integrated function also minimizes bone waste and possible contamination by minimizing handling ofthe bone and the accumulation of the graft material on surfaces such as hoses, filters, containers, etc. The handle provides safe and clean storage ofthe harvested bone 50. After passing through the blade aperture 16 the bone enters a closed storage space formed by the handle in conjunction with the blade and the plunger. This space expands in cross-section area as it approaches the proximal aspect ofthe ramp, encouraging the bone shaves to move into the proximal aspect ofthe handle. The handle interior provides a trough shaped volume where the contents can be inspected, additives incoφorated, and any possible clogging of bone cleared. The plunger 24 can be advanced to consolidate the harvested bone 50 with the blade fully forward. With the blade partially retracted, the plunger advances the graft material to the distal aspect ofthe handle to provide a streamline trough or channel to deliver bone to the recipient site 102. The preferred profile for the forward portion ofthe handle is minimized by transmitting the raking force from the handles center, its thicker and stronger portion. Only a small amount of handle material is required for sufficient strength to carry the normal load to the nose of the handle. This results in a low instrument profile, capable of getting into anatomic spaces of limited dimension. A single pair of grooves 40 guide and retain both the blade and the plunger. This helps to minimize the overall height ofthe handle. The handle is preferably fabricated with a clear plastic. This allows the bone shavings to be monitored as they are cut, providing immediate feedback of bone collection. The total volume of bone collected can be monitored with respect to known volume gradations on the handle that inform the surgeon when an adequate volume of bone has been collected. When the blade is used such that middle and distal portions are exposed , a gripping handle 60 is secured to the proximal end ofthe blade to facilitate handling ofthe blade as shown in Figs 8 A and 8C-8E. The handle 60 is long and round for secure gripping in the hand and has a slot 62 to accept the blade and a rotatable, tightening mechanism 64 to secure the blade in the handle. Also, as shown in Fig. 8F, the blade may be bent at 101, e.g., to facilitate access to tight spots. If desired, the blade may be formed into an elongated "cup" shape, i.e. as shown in Fig. 8B, and a clear or transparent cover 66 fitted over the top of the "cup" so as to permit the user to view the progress of bone collection. The plunger 24 serves two functions; 1 ) to consolidate and advance the bone into the distal end of the chamber, and 2) it provides a locking mechanism to secure the blade in its forward position . The plunger head 42 provides the proximal wall ofthe storage chamber. The plunger is advanced by releasing the locking button 26 which secures both the plunger and the blade in place for cutting and collection. The head ofthe plunger is held in the track distally by riding under the blade. The proximal end is constrained in the same track 40 that the blade rides in and translates forward to a small stop at the forward end ofthe handle. Referring to Fig. 3, the details of the plunger are shown in top view and sectional view wherein the lock button 26 as shown as being mounted on a cantilever arm 46 enabling it to be moved towards the bottom ofthe plunger. The side edges ofthe plunger are free ofthe grooves 40 in the side wall ofthe handle. The sloping surface 44 on the detent arm 40 engages the proximal end of the blade to press the blade tab 18 against the detents 36, thus locking the blade in correct position.

Claims: Claims 1. An instrument for harvesting bone comprising an elongate body (20) having a proximal end and distal end; said body serving as a handle for supporting a blade (12) so that the blade can be held at an acute angle with respect to a bone from which bone shavings are to be harvested; said blade having a cutting structure (14) adjacent its distal end; the cutting edge ofthe structure being defined by a curved hole (16) adjacent the distal end ofthe blade and a tapered curved convex surface forming the distal end ofthe blade. 2. The instrument in claim 1, wherein the blade has a loop shaped cutting structure and the inner edge ofthe loop at its distal end forms a positive rake angle (oc) with respect to the bone surface when said distal end is held in contact with , and at an angle to, the bone. 3. The instrument of claim 1 , wherein the blade has a reduced thickness immediately adj acent the inner edge of the curved hole (16). 4. The instrument in claim 3, wherein said reduced thickness is less than the radial width of the curved hole (16). 5. The instrument in claim 2, wherein the relative rake angle (oc) ofthe cutting edge with respect to the bone decreases as the contact area extends proximal along the curved edge. 6. The instrument in claim 3, wherein the outer section ofthe blade engaging surface is of full thickness to provide a force-transmitting structure for the end (14) ofthe curved blade. 7. The instrument of claim 3, wherein the reduced thickness immediately adjacent the inner edge ofthe curved hole (16) is a ramp-like depression centrally positioned in the blade, with its sidewall retaining the blades full thickness. 8. The instrument of claim 7, wherein the overall thickness ofthe blade (12) is increased, where the central depression (13) then provides a storage area for the bone shavings. 9. The instrument of claim 2, wherein the middle portion ofthe blade (12) has various degrees of bends or offsets to facilitate access to difficult surfaces. 10. The instrument in claim 8, wherein a hollow structure (32) is attached to the blade over the central depression to provide a storage chamber of greater volume for the bone shavings. 11. The instrument of claim 1 , wherein the blade has a tab (28) at its proximal end for transmitting cutting forces to the central portion ofthe handle. 12. The instrument of claim 1, wherein the blade (12) and the handle (60) are one piece. 13. The instrument of claim 14, wherein a plunger (26) is incoφorated into the handle to cause the bone shavings in the storage compartment to be consolidated and dispensed at the distal end of the instrument. 14. An instrument for harvesting bone comprising an elongate body (20) having a proximal end and distal end; said body serving as a handle for supporting a blade (12) so that the blade can be held at an acute angle with respect to a bone from which bone shavings are to be harvested; said blade having a cutting structure (14) adjacent its distal end; the cutting edge ofthe structure being defined by a curved hole (16) adjacent the distal end ofthe blade and a tapered curved convex surface forming the distal end ofthe blade; said blade and handle cooperating to provide a storage space (24) adjacent the distal end ofthe blade for receiving harvested bone from the cutting structure. 15. The instrument in claim 14, wherein the handle (20) is of an ergonomic streamline shape, with a shallow distal profile for accessing greatly narrowed spaces. 16. The instrument in claim 13, wherein said handle (20) is channel shaped, thus creating a central storage space (32) and allowing for a moveable 4th wall to access said space. 17. The instrument in claim 16, wherein a track runs along the upper aspect of each side ofthe channel to secure and allow movement ofthe blade (12) and plunger (24) mechanism. 18. The instrument of claim 14, wherein the handle is composed of a clear plastic (66) that provides visual feedback ofthe progress in collecting the bone shavings (50). 19. The instrument of claim 18, wherein graduations are present to provide indication of the volume of material (50) collected. 20. The instrument of claim 14, wherein the channel defined by the blade and handle is expanding in cross-sectional area as one proceeds from the distal to proximal aspect ofthe handle to encourage flow of bone chips (50) into the handle and away from the blade edge (14). 21. The instrument of claim 17, wherein adj acent to said track are dentents (36) and/or protrusions that provide stops for positioning the blade and the plunger. 22. The instrument of claim 13, wherein the plunger also provides a locking mechanism (42,44) that is self adjusting for manufacturing variation to firmly secure the blade in its distal position when the instrument is cutting function. 23. The instrument of claim 14, wherein the blade forms the fourth wall (42) ofthe storage chamber ofthe handle. 24. The instrument of claim 17, wherein the blade (12) is bowed longitudinally to provide friction for the blade in the track. 25. A blade for use in an instrument for harvesting bone; the blade (12) having a cutting structure adjacent the distal end; the blade having a reduced thickness (13) immediately adjacent the inner edge ofthe curved hole to hold bone; the blade having a loop shaped cutting structure (14) and the inner edge ofthe loop at its distal end forms a positive rake angle (oc) with respect to the bone surface when said distal end is held in contact with, and at an angle to, the bone; the ends ofthe cutting edge having a reduced rake angle with respect to an engaged bone surface during the movement ofthe surface in the direction ofthe long dimension ofthe instrument. 26. A blade for use in an instrument for harvesting bone; the blade (12) having a cutting structure (14) adjacent the distal end; the cutting edge ofthe structure being defined by a curved hole (16) adjacent the distal end ofthe blade and a tapered curved convex surface forming the distal end ofthe blade; the blade having a loop shaped cutting structure and the inner edge of the loop at its distal end forming a positive rake angle (oc) with respect to the bone surface when said distal end is held in contact with, and at an angle to, the bone; the ends of the cutting edge having a reduced rake angle with respect to an engaged bone surface during the movement ofthe surface in the direction of the long dimension ofthe instrument; the cutting edge ofthe structure being defined by a curved hole (16) adjacent the distal end ofthe blade and a tapered curved convex surface forming the distal end ofthe blade. 27. A blade for use in an instrument for harvesting bone; said blade being adapted to provide a storage space (13) for receiving harvested bone; the blade having a cutting structure (14) adjacent the distal end; the cutting edge ofthe structure being defined by a curved hole (16) adjacent the distal end ofthe blade and a tapered curved convex surface forming the distal end ofthe blade; the blade having a reduced thickness immediately adjacent the inner edge ofthe curved hole. 28. The instrument of claim 13, wherein a lock button (26) is provided on the distal end ofthe plunger, the distal end ofthe lock button engaging the proximal end ofthe blade. 29. The instrument of claim 28, wherein the lock button (26) is carried on the end of a spring arm (46) to permit compression of the lock button into the groove to release the blade tab to permit the blade to be withdrawn in the proximal direction and to permit the plunder to be pushed towards the distal end ofthe handle to contact bone particles (50) stored in the handle. 30. The instrument of claim 28, wherein the lock button (26) is positioned proximally ofthe pusher.

Inventors: ALTOBELLI DAVID E, EBNER PETER R, ALTOBELLI, DAVID, E., EBNER, PETER, R.
Applicants: MAXILON LAB INC, MAXILON LABORATORIES, INC.
Application year: 1996
Main classification: A61B17
IPC codes: A61B10, A61B17, A61F2