Image processing system

Abstract: A method of operating a computer to produce contrast enhanced digital images produces a histogram (211) having a first axis corresponding to a measurable property (e.g., luminance) and a second axis corresponding to a count of particular value for the measurable property. This histogram is divided into clusters and histogram equalisation or stretching is performed on each cluster to modify the histogram. The modified histogram is used to adjust the value of the first measurable property to enhance an image contrast. The histogram is divided into clusters using a pattern matching technique, gaussian distributions and uniform distributions being separated into individual clusters.

Description: The present invention relates to image processing, for example to contrast enhancement of images by histogram manipulation. A digital image is an array, usually a rectangular matrix, of pixels. Each pixel is one picture element and is a digital quantity that is a value that represents some property of the image at the location in the array corresponding to a particular location in the image. Typically, in continuous tone black and white images the pixel values represent a grey scale value. Pixel values for an image have to conform to a specified range. For example, each array element may be one byte, i.e., eight bits. In that example, the pixel values must range from 0 to 255. In a grey scale image a 255 may represent absolute white and 0 total black. Colour images consist of three colour planes, generally corresponding to red, green, and blue (RGB). For a particular pixel, there is one value for each of these colour planes, i.e., a value representing the red component, a value representing the green component, and a value representing the blue component. By varying the intensity of these three components, all colours in the colour spectrum may be created. Output devices, such as printers and displays, also have particular ranges for pixel values. A particular device may be configured to accept and output eight-bit image data, i.e., pixel values in the range 0 to 255. However, many images do not have pixel values that make effective use of the full dynamic range of pixel values available on an output device. For example, in the eight-bit case, a particular image may in its digital form only contain pixel values ranging from 100 to 150, i.e., the pixels fall somewhere in the middle of the grey scale. Similarly, an eight-bit colour image may also have RGB values that fall within a range somewhere in the middle of the range available for the output device. The result in either case is that the output is relatively dull in appearance. The visual appearance of an image can often be improved by remapping the pixel values to take advantage of the full range of possible outputs. That procedure is called contrast enhancement. There are several prior art contrast enhancement techniques. These techniques are especially common for monochrome (e.g., grey scale) images, such as from medical (e.g., cat-scans, x-rays, and ultrasound) and radar sources. In such applications, contrast enhancement can be used to find image details that would otherwise be difficult to discern. Contrast enhancement techniques are often based on histogram equalisation. In histogram equalisation a histogram of grey level distribution of the image is constructed. Figure 1 is an example of such a histogram. A histogram is a one dimensional array with an array element corresponding to each value in the range of pixel values. Each histogram element contains a count of the number of pixels that has the particular pixel value corresponding to that element. In histogram equalisation, the pixel values in the image are altered to make the distribution of grey level values as uniform as possible. Histogram equalisation is described in A.K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1989, pp. 241-243. A variation of histogram equalisation, known as adaptive histogram equalisation or local area histogram equalisation, uses a sliding window to define an image region for each pixel. The histogram of that region is then equalised to determine the output value for the pixel. Adaptive histogram equalisation is described in John B. Zimmerman, et al., An evaluation of the effectiveness of adaptive histogram equalisation for contrast enhancement, IEEE Trans. On Medical Imaging, 7(4):304-312, December 1988. The adaptive histogram equalisation procedure is computationally very expensive because a separate histogram is constructed for each image pixel. A number of region-based variants of adaptive histogram equalisation have been proposed in Stephen Pizer et al., Adaptive histogram equalisation and its variations, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 39(3):355-368, September 1987; S.S.Y. Lau, Global image enhancement using local information, Electronics Letters, 30(2) :122-123, January 1994; J.A. stark and W.J. Fitzgerald, Model-based adaptive histogram equalisation, Signal Processing, 37:193-200, 1994. These techniques give comparable results to adaptive histogram equalisation while reducing computation. Deficiencies common to adaptive histogram variants are that although some variants reduce computation requirements substantially relative to full-blown adaptive histogram equalisation, the required computation is still significant enough to be impractical in many applications. A further deficiency of adaptive histogram variants is that because these schemes adjust image pixel values locally, the processed image will not retain the relative lightness of pixels from the original image. For example, some details in a shadow region may be lightened to the point where these details are lighter than sunlit parts of the same image. The uneven lightening/darkening of an image leads to unacceptable visual appearance in photographic images. A generalisation of histogram equalisation, known as histogram specification, adjusts the data so the output histogram has a distribution close to some desired distribution. Histogram specification is described in Jain, supra, page 243. Colour image enhancement is considerably more complicated. Colour images consist of three colour planes, generally corresponding to red, green, and blue (RGB). One simple colour image enhancement technique (described in P.E. Trahanias and A.N. Venetsanopoulos, Colour image enhancement through 3-d histogram equalisation, 11th IAPR Conference on Pattern Recognition, Conference C: Image, Speech, and Signal Analysis, pp. 545-548, September 1992) is to perform histogram equalisation on each colour independently. However, that technique can cause large colour shifts and other undesirable artifacts in the image. One histogram-based contrast enhancement technique that attempts to avoid such artifacts is to construct a three dimensional histogram and perform modifications in all three dimensions jointly. That technique is described in Trahanias and venetsanopoulos, above, and in Phillip A. Misna and Jeffrey J. Rodriguez, Explosion of multidimensional image histograms, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Vol III, pp. 958-962, Austin, Texas, November 1994. Unfortunately, the required computation for the technique of joint modification of a three-dimensional histogram is at least of the order of the number of occupied histogram bins, which can number in excess of a hundred thousand for a moderately large image. This approach is therefore computationally intensive and hence not very practical. Other approaches, including the preferred embodiment of the present invention, transform the image data into some luminance-chrominance colour space and perform the enhancement in this domain. Some techniques adjust only the luminance histogram, while others adjust both luminance and chrominance histograms. Straightforward histogram equalisation on the luminance component can cause undesirable artifacts in the output image. Specifically, large areas of approximately equal luminance can suffer from contouring artifacts, while an especially dark (light) background can cause the foreground objects to become too light (dark). Some of the more complicated enhancement procedures require that the image data undergo a non-linear transformation before processing, which increases the computational complexity. Histogram equalisation of luminance or chrominance histograms is described in Robin N. Strickland, et al., Digital colour image enhancement based on the saturation component, Optical Engineering, 26(7):609-616, July 1987, and in Ilia M. Bockstein, Colour equalisation method and its application to colour image processing, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 3(5):735-737, May 1986. Histogram manipulation has also been used for purposes other than contrast enhancement. For example, for monochrome images, multi-thresholding techniques have been developed for dividing a histogram into clusters. The resulting clusters are then used to segment the image into regions corresponding to various objects and backgrounds. Such clustering techniques are described in P.K. Sahoo, et al., A survey of thresholding techniques, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 41(2):233-260, February 1988. If the histogram contains flat regions of low amplitude between higher peaks, for example, a threshold value anywhere in the flat region would give nearly the same segmentation of the image. For the purpose of contrast enhancement, it is desirable to differentiate between regions of high activity and regions with little activity. Consequently, it is desirable to divide the histogram such that flat regions of low amplitude form separate clusters. Therefore, the multi-thresholding clustering techniques are not suited to colour contrast enhancement. The present invention seeks to provide improved image processing. According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of operating a computer to produce contrast enhanced images as specified in claim 1. According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an image processing system as specified in claim 8. It is thus possible to provide contrast enhancement which is not computationally intensive and which does not introduce undesirable artifacts in the output image. A first embodiment provides a method of operating a computer to produce contrast enhanced digital images. The method commences with the step of producing a histogram having a first axis corresponding to a measurable property (e.g., luminance) and a second axis corresponding to a count of pixels having a particular value for the measurable property. This histogram is divided into clusters and histogram equalisation or stretching is performed on each cluster thereby producing a modified histogram. The modified histogram is used to adjust the value of said first measurable property in said digital form, thereby producing a contrast enhanced image. In one embodiment, the histogram is divided into clusters using a pattern matching technique. For example, patterns in the histogram that resemble gaussian distributions and patterns that resemble uniform distributions are separated into individual clusters. In another embodiment, subsequent to dividing the histogram into clusters, the cluster boundaries are remapped proportionally to the cluster's range, the number of pixels in the range, the total number of pixels in the image, and the histogram extent. In another embodiment, some other property (e.g., chrominance) of the image is used to limit the values of the modified histogram. Another embodiment provides a computer system for image processing having a histogram producing unit operable to produce a histogram data structure in a memory on the computer system. The computer system further contains a clusterizer connected to the histogram data structure and is operable to partition the histogram data structure into clusters. A histogram cluster boundary adjuster is connected to the histogram data structure and is operable to adjust boundaries of each cluster in said data structure such that said boundaries conform to a function having the parameters cluster width (R0), a count of pixels in the cluster (Ni), a count of pixels in the image (Nt), the original histogram extent (EO), and a desired histogram extent (Ed). A histogram adjuster is also connected to said histogram data structure and is operable to modify the histogram for each such cluster according to a desired characteristic. A preferred embodiment provides apparatus for improving the visual appearance of digitised images stored in an image data structure by contrast enhancement, comprising a histogram data structure; a histogram generator connected to the histogram data structure and operable to store in the histogram data structure histogram data for a property of the images; a histogram clusterizer connected to the histogram data structure and operable to define clusters in the histogram, in which each such cluster has a range; a histogram remapper connected to the histogram data structure and operable to adjust the range of each such cluster; and a histogram adjuster connected to the histogram data structure and operable to adjust the histogram of each cluster. Preferably, the histogram adjuster is a histogram equaliser or stretcher. The apparatus may include an image transformer connected to the image data structure and operable to transform the image from a first data format to a second data format having the first property. The preferred converted image format is selected from the set of Y-Cb-Cr, CIE L*a*b*, CIE XYZ, and Y-U-V. An embodiment of the present invention is described below, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 is an exemplary histogram showing the number of pixels of an image having each valid grey level value. Figure 2 is a block diagram of an embodiment of computer system with enhanced contrast of digitised images. Figure 3 is a block diagram of the process flow of an image processing system. Figure 4 is a block diagram of an embodiment of image processing system having a contrast enhancer. Figure 5 shows a block diagram of the operation of a contrast enhancer of the system of Figure 4. Figure 6 is an exemplary luminance histogram showing two peaks separated by a flat-region. Figure 7 graphically shows the division of a histogram into several clusters. Figure 8 is a flow chart of the preferred clusterizing procedure. Figures 9 a is an exemplary unmodified luminance histogram. Figure 9b, 9c 1 and 9d are luminance histograms modified by the preferred contrast enhancer using different parameter values. The preferred embodiment may be practised on a general purpose computer system, on a special purpose image processing system, in software used for image processing, in device drivers and other applications involving digital image manipulation. For illustrative purposes, the preferred embodiment is described below in the context of a device driver loaded into a general purpose computer for execution when an image is output on a particular device controlled by the device driver. A. Computer system description Figure 2 is a block diagram of a computer system 100 in which the preferred processing system is used to enhance the contrast of digitised images. The computer system 100 consists of a computer 101 connected to several input-output devices, e.g., a scanner 113, a printer 115, a monitor 117, and one or more disk drives 119. The computer 101 may be connected to other input devices 121. These other input devices 121 may include one or more of the following: frame grabbers, CCD cameras, CD ROM drives, digital cameras, medical imaging devices such as CAT-scan, X-ray, and ultrasound. The computer 101 consists of a central processing unit (CPU) 103 and a random access memory (RAM) 105. The computer 101 may further contain a read only memory (ROM) 107. These devices are connected to one another via bus 109. The computer 101 may also contain input-output control units 111a through 111f connected to the input-output devices 113 through 119. In the operation as a digital image processing system, a digitised image is input to the computer 101. The source of the image may be a scanner 113. The source of the digitised image may also be another source of digitised images, such as, photo cd, a digital camera (e.g., a CCD (charged coupled devices) camera), or a frame grabber. Furthermore, the computer system 100 may be connected via a network 123 to other computer systems 100' and 100", etc. The digitised images may then be down-loaded onto system 100 from one or more of these other computer systems 100' and 100". An image may be scanned directly into the RAM 105 of the computer 101 or an image 109 may be stored in secondary storage, such as, the disk drive 119. Depending on its size, the disk drive 123 can store a large number of digitised images. The disk drive 123 also contains one or more output drivers 125. There is an output driver 125 associated with each output device 115. The output devices are may be printers, e.g., colour ink jet printers or colour laser printers, such as those manufactured by the Hewlett-Packard Company, Palo Alto, California. The output devices may also include dye sublimation printers, e.g., the Kodak Colorease printer. When the operating system software (not shown) of the computer 101 encounters a command to output an image 109 on one of the output devices 115, it loads the appropriate output driver 125 into the RAM 105. In an alternative embodiment, the output driver is stored in ROM 107. In such embodiments, the step of loading the output driver is not necessary. Figure 3 is a block diagram of the process flow of an image processing system. An image of an object 301 is captured by an imaging device 303. A digitiser 305 converts the image into a digital representation. The digital version of the image is then stored 307 into a storage device, e.g., the RAM 105. Subsequent to storing, the image is retrieved from the storage device and processed 309. Processing 309 may either be done by the CPU 103, or by processors located in the input devices or output devices. Processing 309 may further be partitioned between input, output, and main computer system processors. Finally, the processed image is output 311 onto some form of output device, e.g., printer 115. It should be noted that the preferred contrast enhancer may be employed at any stage in the process flow of Figure 3. B. Device Drivers Figure 4 is a block diagram of an image processing system having a contrast enhancer according to the preferred embodiment. Figure 4 shows a device driver 125 loaded into the RAM 105. The output driver 125 consists of a contrast enhancer 205 and an output control 203. The output control 203 accepts as input digitised images and outputs control instructions to the output device 115. For a printer driver, the printer driver (output driver) includes instructions to control the amount and placement of ink of various colours on the output medium. The contrast enhancer 205 is connected to a data structure for storing a histogram 211 of some property of the image 109. In one embodiment, the histogram property is luminance, i.e., the histogram 211 contains an entry for each possible luminance value for the particular output device 115 and each such luminance value entry is the number of pixels that has that particular luminance value. The contrast enhancer 205 contains several modules. A first module is an image transformer 207. The image transformer 207 accepts as input an image 109 in one format and transforms it into an image having at least one property used for contrast enhancement. In one embodiment, luminance is used for contrast enhancement, thus, the image transformer 207 transforms the input image 109 into a representation having a luminance component, e.g., YCrCb or CIELab colour co-ordinate systems. The functionality of the image transformer 207 is described in greater detail below in conjunction with Figure 5. The contrast enhancer 205 contains a histogram generator 209. The histogram generator 209 counts the number of pixels having each value in the range of values allowable for the particular property used for contrast adjustment of the image. These pixel counts are stored in a one dimensional histogram array 211 in the RAM 125. In one embodiment, luminance is used for contrast enhancement. Thus, in that embodiment, the histogram contains counts of pixels each having a valid luminance value. The contrast enhancer 205 further contains a clusterizer 213 for determining clusters in the histogram 211. The operation of the clusterizer 213 is described in greater detail below in the section entitled "Clusterizer". Having established clusters in the histogram 211, the contrast enhancer 205 calls upon a cluster adjuster 215 to adjust the boundaries of the various clusters. Histogram equalisation or histogram stretching is then performed on the adjusted clusters by a histogram equaliser/stretcher 219. And using the output histogram, the pixel values are remapped by a luminance histogram remapper 217. A data checker 221 verifies that output values remain within allowed bounds for the particular colour space used by this embodiment. The various modules of the contrast enhancer 205 are controlled by a control program 223. The control program 223 implements the flow-diagram of Figure 5. C. Contrast enhancer Figure 5 shows a block diagram of the operation of the preferred embodiment of contrast enhancer 205. The contrast enhancer 205 first divides the luminance histogram into clusters. The contrast enhancer 205 next performs histogram equalisation or stretching on each cluster separately, and the entire cluster is remapped to a new luminance region based on the cluster width, the number of pixels in the cluster, and the original histogram extent. The chrominance information is used to limit the modified luminance values prior to remapping the pixel values to avoid colour shifts due to saturation. D. Colour Transformation In a first embodiment, the contrast enhancement is based on luminance values. Therefore, in that embodiment, first, the contrast enhancer 205 converts the RGB image data of an input image 109 to a luminance-chrominance representation, step 501. In general terms, the preferred embodiment is equally applicable to all colour image representations. However, the particular method used will vary from representation to representation. For exemplary purposes, the description below of the preferred embodiments, considers input images 109 as having been stored using the RGE components specified by the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE-C RGB). The white point is taken to be the standard CIE D65 white point, and the gamma is assumed to be either 1 (linear RGB) or 2.2 (gamma corrected for NTSC). The transformation and hence the contrast enhancement results will vary somewhat if different basis values are assumed, however it has been found that these assumptions work well for colour images that are designed to be viewed on a computer monitor. A more detailed discussion of these parameters is given in R.W.G. Hunt, The Reproduction of Colour in Photography, Printing & Television, Fountain Press, Tolworth, England, 1987. Of course, a colour image 109 may have been stored in a format containing a luminance component, in which case the contrast enhancer 205 can skip the transformation step 501. One embodiment uses the YCrCb colour space. Alternative embodiments, use CIELab, YUV, or YIQ colour spaces. In one embodiment, YCrCb is selected because it is a convenient representation for digital processing because the chrominance components have easily computed maximum and minimum values. For example, if the RGB components each have an allowable range of 0 to 255, Y will fall between 0 and 255 as well, and the Cr and Cb values will both be between -127 and 128. A gamma corrected RGB image can be converted to YCrCb using a simple linear transformation. specifically, Y = .299R + .587G + .114B Cr = .713 (R-Y) Cb = .564 (B-Y). The CIELab colour space, which was designed to be approximately perceptually uniform, is often used for digital image compression and transmission. The conversion to CIELab is somewhat more complicated, since the CIELab colour space is defined in terms of the standard CIE XYZ colour space. For gamma corrected RGB, this transformation is computed in three stages. First, convert to linear RGB. R 1 = 255 2.2 R 255 G 1 = 255 2.2 G 255 B 1 = 255 2.2 B 255 Next, a linear transformation is used to convert to CIE XYZ. Finally, the data is converted to CIELab via the following equations. where In one embodiment, these transformations are scaled and translated to produce integer values between 0 and 255 for all colour components. In alternative embodiments, images may be digitised to other "bits-per-pixel" formats, e.g., four or sixteen. In those embodiments, the transformations are scaled to ranges appropriate for those formats. E. Luminance Histogram Clustering After the colour transformation, the data will consist of a luminance component 503 and two chrominance components 505 and 507. Next, the contrast enhancer 205 calls upon the histogram generator 209 to construct the luminance histogram 211 from the luminance data 503 The histogram 211 is then input into clusterizer 213 to be divided into clusters, step 511. Assuming that luminance is recorded using one byte per pixel, the histogram 211 is a one dimensional array with 256 elements, so the required computation for clustering is independent of image size. The remapping of luminance values is based partially on cluster extent. Therefore, the exact threshold locations can be quite important. The clusterizer 213 strives to divide the histogram such that flat regions are separate clusters, as illustrated in Figure 6. Figure 6 is an exemplary luminance histogram 600 having two peaks, one 601 in the low-luminance range and one 603 in the high-luminance range. These two peaks 601 and 603 are separated by a flat region 605 with low pixel counts. The clusterizer 213 strives to divide the exemplary histogram 600 such that flat-region 605 is a separate cluster. The clusterizer 213 uses a maximum likelihood technique for splitting clusters in conjunction with a tree growing algorithm to determine the next cluster to split. Initially the clusterizer 213 views the histogram 211 as a single cluster, and successively splits existing clusters to generate the final result of a histogram 211 divided into several clusters. The procedure used by the clusterizer 213 is illustrated in Figure 7 and a flow-diagram of the procedure is shown in Figure 8. Initially the histogram 211 is viewed as one cluster 701, step 801. The cluster 701 is represented in a splitting tree 703 as node 701'. Next, the cluster 701 is split into two clusters 702a and 702b, which in turn are represented in the splitting tree 703 as nodes 702a' and 702b'. After several iterations, the histogram has been split into clusters 705a-e, corresponding to leaf-nodes 705a' through 705e' in the splitting tree 703. To decide which cluster to split, the clusterizer 213 searches among the existing clusters for the cluster that looks the least like a peak or a flat-region, step 803. To make that determination, the clusterizer 213 computes two different log likelihoods for each existing cluster, first assuming a Gaussian distribution and then a uniform distribution. A Gaussian distribution is taken to approximate a peak, and a uniform distribution is taken to approximate a flat-region. Therefore, a cluster that deviates a great deal from both a Gaussian distribution and a uniform distribution is a good candidate to split into additional clusters. The data values in each cluster are assumed to be independent and identically distributed (iid), and the parameters of the Gaussian distribution are taken to be the values that maximise the log likelihood. The log likelihood equations for a given cluster C under the Gaussian and uniform assumptions can thus be computed via (1) and (2), respectively. LL U = - N log(| C |) where and the array value hist[i] is the number of image pixels in histogram bin i. The log likelihood associated with each cluster is then taken to be the maximum of (1) and (2). The cluster with minimum log likelihood is chosen as the next cluster to split. Thus, the algorithm chooses the existing cluster that looks the least like either a Gaussian or a uniform density. The average (per pixel) log likelihood of the chosen cluster is stored for each split. When this value is large enough in comparison with the value for the previous split, the clustering procedure terminates, step 804. The exact stopping criterion is given in Table 1: pseudo-code for algorithm to divide histogram into clusters. initialize old11 = ý, New11 = 0, and M = 1 while (M < MaxM) for i = 1 to M use (1) to compute LL G (i) use (2) to compute LL U (i) set LL(i) to max(LL G (i), LL U (i)) set N(i) = number of pixels in cluster i set c = arg min. i-1...M (LL(i)) set New11 = LL(c)/N(c) if (New11 > 0.8*Old11) Stop reindex clusters c+1...M to c+2...M+1 use (5) to split cluster c into 2 new clusters indexed c and c + 1 if (c > 1) recompute boundary between c - 1 and c using (5) if (c < M) recompute boundary between c + 1 and c + 2 using (5) set M = M + 1 set Old11 = New11 terminate with M clusters. Table 1: Pseudo-code for algorithm to divide histogram into clusters. After selecting a cluster to split, the clusterizer 213 determines the point, within the range represented by the cluster, to split that cluster, step 805. To select the boundary point, the clusterizer 213 looks for uniformity in the histogram patterns on either side of the boundary point. For example, in the cluster 701 of Figure 7, the pixel counts in histogram bins left of the dividing line 707 are all relatively low and the pixel counts in the histogram bins to the right of dividing line 707 are relatively high. Therefore, the index at dividing line 707 is selected as the splitting boundary. As a first step to select the boundary between the two new clusters, the clusterizer 213 models the data within the selected cluster as iid random samples from a mixture distribution. The distributions in the mixture are both discrete uniform distributions U (.,.), with the first extending from histogram bin 1 through bin m-l and the second from in through r-1, where the cluster extends from 1 through r-1 and in is between 1 and r. Each data value in the cluster is U(1,m) with some probability D and U(m,r) with probability (1- D). The likelihood of the histogram data y in the cluster is thus p ( y |m,D) = N 1 D m-l N-N 1 1-D r-m , where To select the boundary at which to split the selected cluster, the clusterizer 213 seeks to pick m and d values such as to maximise (3). The value m will then be the boundary between the two new clusters. Taking the log of (3) gives The maximum likelihood estimate of D is computed by setting the partial derivative of (4) with respect to D to zero. This gives D = N 1 / N. Substituting into (4), selection of the boundary point is done by maximising the following function of m: where D ( p ∥ q ) = p log ( p q ) + (1 - p ) log ( 1- p 1- q ) is the Kullback-Leibler distance between two binomial distributions with probabilities p and q, respectively (S. Kuliback and R.A. Leibler, On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22:79-86, 1951). Note that N 1 is a function of m. The clusterizer 213 maximises (5) using an exhaustive search on 1+1,..., r-1. This search gives the boundary between the two new clusters. Finally, the cluster boundaries to either side of the original cluster are recomputed given the result of the split, step 807. Table 1 is a pseudo-code listing of the clustering algorithm. In addition to terminating as described above in conjunction with Step 804, the procedure also terminates if the original histogram has been split into a maximum number of clusters, step 809. F. Luminance Remapping After the clusterizer 213 has divided the luminance histogram into clusters, the contrast enhancer 205 calls upon the histogram luminance remapper 217 to remap the luminance values to new values based on cluster width, the number of pixels in each cluster, and the original histogram extent, step 513 of Figure 5. Let N(i) = number of pixels in cluster i Nt = total number of pixels in the image 1(i), r(i) = left and right limits of clusters i before modification a, b = left and right limits of histogram before modification a', b' = desired left and right limits of histogram after modification where a and b are defined to be the tightest bounds such that less than 1% of the image pixels fall to either side of the interval [a,...,b-1]. Given the desired values for a' and b', the luminance histogram remapper 217 remaps the cluster boundaries according to where the parameter w is a weighting factor between 0 and 1. The maximum dynamic range is achieved by setting a' and b' to the allowable limits, usually 0 and 256, respectively. However, most computer monitors and printers contain an offset below which all values map to black. The offset can vary from about 30 to 70 depending on the output device. In such applications, these parameters are set as follows: a' = 30, b' = 256 as the desired range. G. Histogram equalisation on clusters After the histogram remapper 217, using (6) and (7), has computed the new cluster boundaries, histogram equalisation is performed, step 515, by histogram equaliser/stretcher 219, on each cluster separately so the remapped data within each cluster is distributed as close to uniformly as possible, step 517. Alternatively, the histogram equaliser/stretcher 219 can be used to stretch the data, so that the remapped data extends to the cluster boundaries but the shape of the histogram within a cluster remains unchanged. Figure 9 shows the results of performing this modification on a given image histogram. In this example, the remapping was performed using weighting factors of 0, 0.5, and 1. The spikes that appear in the modified histograms are due to quantization effects during the pixel remapping, step 517. The data in any histogram bin can be remapped to a different value, but it cannot be split among multiple bins. For example, suppose bins 100 through 102 each contain 1000 pixels initially. If we wish to remap this range to bins 110 through 113, we have 3 input bins being mapped to 4 output bins. One of the output bins (110, 111, 112, or 113) must therefore be empty while the other three contain 1000 pixels apiece. This will result in a downward spike in the output histogram. Similarly, if a given input range is mapped to a smaller output range, upward spikes will result. Both effects can be seen in Figure 9b-d. Note that a weighting factor of w = 0 in (7) will result in the relative cluster widths remaining unchanged after the remapping. This can limit the amount of contrast enhancement to too modest a level for images with clusters at both bright and dark luminance levels, as illustrated in Figure 9b. A weighting factor of w = 1, on the other hand, gives exactly the same mapping as histogram equalisation performed on the entire histogram; the clusters do not affect the mapping. As noted earlier, this can cause excessive luminance shifts for some images. In the preferred embodiment, a weighting factor of 0.5 is used, because this weighting factor has been found to result in good image quality over a large range of images. H. Using Chrominance values to Prevent Overflow Thus far the remapping of pixel values has depended only on the luminance component. However, the maximum allowable luminance value for a pixel depends on the chrominance of that pixel. If the luminance value exceeds this maximum, at least one of the colour components will be greater than the saturation level (usually 255) when the value is transformed back to RGB. To prevent this overflow from occurring, the contrast enhancer 205 calls upon a data checker 221 to use the chrominance values for each pixel to set a luminance threshold, step 519. If the remapped luminance exceeds this threshold for a given pixel, the data checker 221 sets the pixel luminance to the threshold value. The computation of a luminance threshold given the chrominance values is straightforward for the YCrCb colour space since Cr is proportional to R-Y and Cb is proportional to B-Y. For the YCrCb colour space, we can easily ensure that the red and blue components are not driven into saturation. In practice, colour shifts are very visible in skin tones, which are predominantly red, and in sky, for which blue dominates. However, saturation of the green component is generally less visible than for red and blue, so in an embodiment with reduced computations, green component overflow check is not necessary in the YCrCb implementation. For the CIELab colour space the overflow checking is less straightforward. There is no simple way to relate the overflow of a specific RGB component to Lab values. Therefore, in a CIELab embodiment, a two dimensional lookup table, indexed by the quantized a and b values, that contains the luminance threshold, is employed. To construct the look-up table, the eight corners of RGB space (RGB = (0,0,0), (0,0,255), (0,255,0), etc.) were first converted to CIELab colour space. The corner values constitute eight values for the lookup table. The table is filled in using bilinear interpolation between these corner values. The resulting thresholds are not precisely correct, but any overflow errors that still occur are small enough that only minor colour shifts result. Thus, visual degradation is kept small. This procedure requires a 256 x 256 lookup table of unsigned characters, but its operation is very fast. Alternatively, the bilinear interpolation could be performed for each image pixel in turn, which would not require the extra memory but would be much slower. I. Convert to RGB colour space Finally, having computed remapped values for all pixels in the image 109, the image is converted back to RGB space, step 521. The resulting image may then be stored back into RAM 105 or written onto a hard disk 119. Alternatively, the image may be printed on a printer 115 or output on another output device. J. Conclusion The preferred contrast enhancer 205 may be used to improve the image quality of an image at any stage in the process flow of Figure 3. For example, an input device, such as a digital camera may include a contrast enhancer 205 and improve the contrast of an image prior to transferring the image to a computer 101. Alternatively, the computer 101 may include the contrast enhancer 205 to improve image quality of images prior to printing or displaying the images. The contrast enhancer 205 may also be incorporated into image processing software packages such as computerised "dark-rooms". Yet another alternative use of a contrast enhancer 205 is as part of a printer driver 125. A further alternative is to place the contrast enhancer 205 "on-board" an output device, e.g., a printer 115 in its internal control mechanism.

Claims: A method of operating a computer to produce contrast enhanced images, wherein an image is composed of a plurality of pixels, comprising the steps of: inputting (109) in digital form an original image into a storage unit of said computer; producing (509) a histogram of said digital form having a first axis corresponding to a first measurable property and a second axis corresponding to a count of pixels having a particular value for said first measurable property; detecting patterns in the histogram by detecting regions in said histogram that resemble Gaussian distributions and detecting other regions in said histogram that resemble uniform distributions and dividing (511) the histogram into clusters based on said patterns; performing (515) histogram equalisation on each cluster separately thereby producing a modified histogram; and using (517) said modified histogram to adjust the value of said first measurable property in said digital form, thereby producing said contrast enhanced image. A method as in claim 1, wherein said dividing step comprises the step of partitioning the histogram into clusters of equal size. A method as in claim 1 or 2, wherein for an RGB image the method comprises the step of converting said RGB image into a format having a luminance component. A method as in any preceding claim, wherein said first measurable property is a light intensity measure and wherein for each light intensity value said count of pixels is a count of pixels having that particular light intensity, and wherein said histogram has an extent equal to the highest and lowest light intensity values in said original image, each cluster representing a range in said histogram, the sum of the histogram values for the range corresponding to the number of pixels having a light intensity within the range of the cluster; the method comprising the step of remapping cluster boundaries proportionally to the cluster's range (Ro), said number of pixels within said range (Ni), the total number of pixels in the image (Nt), and said histogram extent (Eo). A method as in claim 4, wherein said remapping step comprises the step of selecting a desired range for the histogram (Ed) of said output image; and stretching the width of each cluster according to the relationship: wherein w is a weighting factor ranging from 0 to 1.0 and R n is the new cluster width. A method as in any preceding claim, wherein for an image with a digital form which comprises a second measurable property, said generating step comprises the step of for each pixel in said contrast enhanced image, limiting the value of said first measurable property as a function of the value of said second measurable property. A method as in claim 6, comprising the steps of generating a table of maximum values of said first measurable property as a function of said second measurable property; said limiting step comprising, for each value V of said second measurable property, the step of retrieving from said table the maximum value M for said first measurable property corresponding to said value V and if said value V exceeds said maximum value H setting the value V to H. An image processing system for producing contrast enhanced images, wherein an image is composed of a plurality of pixels, comprising: a storage unit (105) operable to store a digital form of an original image; a histogram producing unit (209) operable to produce a histogram of a said digital form having a first axis corresponding to a first measurable property and a second axis corresponding to a count of pixels having a particular value for said first measurable property; pattern detecting means operable to detect patterns in a said histogram by detecting regions in the histogram that resemble Gaussian distributions and detecting other regions in the histogram that resemble uniform distributions and to divide (511) the histogram into clusters based on the detected patterns; a histogram equaliser (219) operable to perform histogram equalisation on each cluster separately thereby to produce a modified histogram; and adjustment means operable by using a said modified histogram to adjust the value of said first measurable property in said digital form, thereby to produce a contrast enhanced image. An image processing system as in claim 8, wherein said first measurable property is a light intensity measure and wherein for each light intensity value said count of pixels is a count of pixels having that particular light intensity, and wherein a said histogram has an extent equal to the highest and lowest light intensity values in the original image, each cluster representing a range in said histogram, the sum of the histogram values for the range corresponding to the number of pixels having a light intensity within the range of the cluster; the histogram equaliser comprising the means for remapping cluster boundaries proportionally to the cluster's range (ro), the number of pixels within the range (Ni), the total number of pixels in the image (Nt), and histogram extent (Eo). An image processing system as in claim 9, wherein said remapping means is operable to select a desired range for the histogram (Ed) of the output image and to stretch the width of each cluster according to the relationship: wherein w is a weighting factor ranging from 0 to 1.0 and R n is the new cluster width. An image processing system as in claim 8, 9 or 10, comprising an image translator (207) containing transformations between a first image format and a second image format that includes said first property. An image processing system as in any one of claims 8 to 11, comprising an image generator connected to said histogram data structure and said original image, and operable to generate a contrast enhanced image from said histogram data structure and said original image.

Inventors: TRETTER DANIEL R, TRETTER, DANIEL R.
Applicants: HEWLETT PACKARD CO, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Application year: 1996
Main classification: G06T5
IPC codes: H04N5, G06T5, H04N9, H04N1