Weighing apparatus

Abstract: A weighing apparatus comprises a weighing cell (2) for weighing an article to be weighed and outputting a weighing signal corresponding to the weight thereof and a floor vibration detecting cell (4) for detecting vibration of a floor on which the weighing cell (2) is installed and for outputting a floor vibration detection signal. The weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal are selectively sampled (8a) at a predetermined sampling frequency and a single A/D convertor (8b) converts each of the sampled signals into a digital weighing signal (W) or a digital floor vibration detection signal (F) respectively. A first digital filter (28) filters the digital weighing signal and a second digital filter (30) filters the digital floor vibration detection signal. A floor vibration compensator (34) subtracts the filtered digital floor vibration detection signal from the filtered digital weighing signal and outputs a floor vibration compensated signal wherein error of the weighing signal caused by floor vibration is compensated for. A phase corrector (26) nullifies a phase difference, caused by a difference in the times at which the weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal are sampled, by applying a suitable modification, corresponding to the phase difference, to the weighing signal or the floor vibration detection signal before or after filtering.

Description: This invention relates to a weighing apparatus having a weighing cell on which an article to be weighed is located and which provides a weighing signal. The apparatus compensates for weighing errors due to a low frequency vibration component of a floor on which the weighing cell is installed. Generally, in a factory production line, when weighing articles to be weighed, mechanical vibration occurs when the articles to be weighed are loaded onto a weighing apparatus and floor vibration originating in the environment such as the ground, a building, a floor or a frame occurs, and these vibrational components are superimposed on the weighing signal. This weighing signal with superimposed vibrations is digitised at a predetermined sampling frequency by an A/D convertor and filtered by a digital filter (CPU) and the mechanical vibration component thereof is thereby removed. However, because the frequencies of floor vibration components are generally lower than those of mechanical vibration components, it is necessary for the cutoff frequency of the digital filter to be set low if this is also to remove the floor vibration components. When this is done, the filtering time becomes long and the weighing speed falls. To avoid this, a weighing apparatus having a floor vibration compensating (AFV: Anti-Floor Vibration) function for removing a floor vibration component by separate correction is used. In this weighing apparatus a floor vibration detecting cell which outputs a floor vibration detection signal is disposed in the vicinity of the weighing cell and on the same floor as the weighing cell. This floor vibration detection signal is digitised by an AID convertor and filtered by a digital filter (CPU) whereby mechanical vibration is removed and then floor vibration compensation (AFV) for removing the floor vibration component from the weighing signal is carried out by subtracting this filtered floor vibration signal from the filtered weighing signal. In this way, setting the cutoff frequency of the digital filter high is made possible and the realisation of high-speed weighing is promoted. It is desirable to make the apparatus small and low-cost and so a single A/D convertor has been used to which the weighing signal of the weighing side and the floor vibration detection signal of the AFV side have been selectively fed for digitisation using channel changeover. This is described in EP-A-0430695. However, in this conventional apparatus, because a single AID convertor is used, the weighing side and the AFV side cannot be sampled at the same time and the sampling timing of the two signals differs and consequently a phase difference arises between the two signals. Therefore, there has been the problem that because floor vibration compensation is carried out with a phase difference existing it lacks accuracy and it is not possible to promote high-precision weighing. In accordance with the present invention, a weighing apparatus comprises a weighing cell for weighing an article to be weighed and outputting a weighing signal corresponding to the weight thereof; a floor vibration detecting cell for detecting vibration of a floor on which the weighing cell is installed and for outputting a floor vibration detection signal; means for sampling the weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal selectively at a predetermined sampling frequency; an A/D convertor for converting each of the sampled signals into a digital weighing signal or a digital floor vibration detection signal respectively; first digital filtering means for filtering the digital weighing signal; second digital filtering means for filtering the digital floor vibration detection signal; floor vibration compensating means for subtracting the filtered digital floor vibration detection signal from the filtered digital weighing signal and outputting a floor vibration compensated signal wherein error of the weighing signal caused by floor vibration is compensated for; and phase correcting means for applying a phase correction to the weighing signal or the floor vibration detection signal before or after filtering to nullify a phase difference caused by a difference in the times at which the weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal are sampled. This invention solves the above-mentioned problem points and provides a weighing apparatus with which it is possible to promote high-precision weighing even when a single A/D convertor is used and a phase difference caused by a gap in sampling timing of a weighing signal and a floor vibration detection signal arises. The sampling means and the A/D convertor could be separate components, but alternatively they could be provided with a common digital convertor. The phase correcting means causes a phase difference, caused by a gap in the timing of the sampling of the weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal in the A/D convertor, to be nullified by applying a phase gap equivalent to this phase difference to the weighing signal or the floor vibration detection signal. Therefore, because the phase difference arising due to the sampling timing gap of the weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal ceases to exist, it is possible to increase the accuracy of floor vibration compensation when the floor vibration detection signal is subtracted from the weighing signal. Typically, the sampling means samples the weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal alternately. Preferably, the phase correcting means nullifies the phase difference caused by the gap of sampling timing by simple-averaging the sampled weighing signal or floor vibration detection signal. This is particularly suitable where each signal is sampled for substantially the same time and at substantially the same frequency. According to the construction described above, by the alternately sampled weighing signal or floor vibration detection signal being simple-averaged by the phase correcting means, it is possible to easily nullify the phase difference caused by the gap in sampling timing. Some examples of a weighing apparatus according to the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:- Figure 1 is a schematic block diagram of apparatus according to a first example of the present invention; Figure 2 is a schematic block diagram of the CPU shown in Figure 1; Figure 3 illustrates graphically an example of the relative magnitudes of the signals input to the multiplexer at I in Figure 1; Figure 4 illustrates graphically an example of the signal input to the A/D convertor II in Figure 1; Figure 5a is the preferred example of the digitised signal output from the digital convertor at III in Figure 1; Figure 5b is an alternative example of the digitised signal output from the digital convertor at III in Figure 1; Figure 6 shows how the phase correction is achieved; Figure 7 shows the phase corrected signals prior to digital filtering at IV in Figure 2; Figure 8 is a flow diagram showing the order in which the phase correction and filtering processes occur; Figure 9 shows the gain corrected signals input into the vibration compensator of Figure 2; Figure 10 is a schematic block diagram of apparatus according to a second example of the present invention; Figure 11 is a schematic block diagram of the CPU shown in Figure 10; Figure 12 shows the signal λ output from the A/D convertor to the CPU in the second example of the present invention; Figure 13 is a schematic block diagram of an alternative CPU according to a third example of the present invention; Figure 14 is a schematic block diagram of apparatus according to a fourth example of the present invention; and, Figure 15 is a diagram showing the changeover means of the fourth example of the present invention. In Figure 1, a weighing apparatus according to an example of this invention is shown. This weighing apparatus comprises a weighing cell (load cell) 2 and a floor vibration detecting cell (load cell) 4. A fixed part 2a of the weighing cell 2 and a fixed part 4a of the floor vibration detecting cell 4 are supported at neighbouring locations on a common frame 12 installed on the same floor 7. A weighing table D is mounted on a movable part 2b of the weighing cell 2 and a weight M1 applying a fixed load to the floor vibration detecting cell 4 is mounted on a movable part 4b of the floor vibration detecting cell 4. The weighing apparatus also comprises amplifiers 5A,5B which amplify respectively a weighing signal and a floor vibration detection signal obtained from the weighing cell 2 and the floor vibration detecting cell 4, LPFs (low pass filters) 6A,6B sequentially connected to the output sides of the amplifiers 5A,5B, a digital convertor 8 and a CPU 10. The CPU 10, as shown in Figure 2, comprises a channel changeover means 22, sampling controlling means 24, channel changeover controlling means 25, phase correcting means 26 having a memory 27, the means 26 operating in synchrony with the channel changeover controlling means 25, first digital filtering means 28 having a memory 29, second digital filtering means 30 having a memory 31, gain correcting means 32, and floor vibration compensating means 34. The operation of this apparatus will be described below. First, because the weighing cell 2 and the floor vibration detecting cell 4 are supported at neighbouring locations on the frame 12, floor vibrations of substantially the same frequency and amplitude are applied to both of the cells 2,4. In this state, a weighing signal of an article to be weighed M2 is outputted from the weighing cell 2 and a floor vibration detection signal is outputted from the floor vibration detecting cell 4. These signals are amplified by the respective amplifiers 5A,5B, have frequencies above a fixed frequency removed by the low pass filters 6A,6B, and are inputted into the digital convertor 8. The low pass filters 6A,6B are used to remove frequencies greater than twice the above-mentioned sampling frequency of the digital convertor 8. This prevents aliasing of the signal during sampling as will be understood by anyone skilled in the art. Figure 3 shows graphically the relative magnitudes of the two signals entering the digital convertor 8 at point I in Figure 1. Even though the two cells 2,4 are subject to the same vibrations, the weighing signal a has a larger amplitude variation than the floor vibration detection signal b. This is as a result of the weight of the article to be weighed M2 being greater than the weight of the weight M1, which causes the oscillations of the movable part 2b to be greater than the oscillations of the movable part 4b. The digital convertor 8 includes a two channel change-over device in the form of a multiplexer 8a which receives a sampling control signal C2, at a sampling frequency fs, from the channel changeover controlling means 25 of the CPU 10. The multiplexer 8a selectively samples the weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal at the predetermined sampling frequency fs (for example 4kHz). The form of the signal output from the multiplexer 8a, at point II, is shown in Figure 4. To ensure that information concerning the effect of the vibrations on the signals is not lost during sampling by the multiplexer 8a, it is important that the sampling frequency fs is much greater than the frequency of the vibrations fvib. The sampled signals are then outputted to the A/D convertor 8b which converts the signals into a digital weighing signal W or a digital floor vibration detection signal F respectively. These signals with a mechanical vibration corresponding to the weight of the article to be weighed M2 superimposed are then outputted to the CPU 10 as signal λ (see Figure 2). The sampling frequency of the A/D convertor 8b is controlled by a sampling control signal C1 which the A/D convertor receives from the sampling control means 24. In the preferred example of the invention, the signal C1 is of the same frequency as the signal C2, although the signals will be phase shifted relative to each other. This means that the multiplexer 8a and the A/D convertor 8b sample incoming signals at the same frequency. As a result the signal λ output by the A/D convertor 8b to the CPU 10 at point III has the form shown in Figure 5a. The weighing signal W has a number of values a 0 , a 1 , a 2 , a 3 ... which alternate with a number of values b 0 , b 1 , b 2 ... of the floor vibration detection signal F. In an alternative example of the invention the signal C1 has a greater frequency than the signal C2 causing the AID convertor 8b to sample at a higher frequency than the multiplexer 8a. Figure 5b shows an example of the resulting signal λ at point III if the A/D convertor 8b samples at twice the rate of the multiplexer 8a. In this case, the weighing signal W has a number of pairs of values a 0 , a 1 , a 2 ... which alternate with a number of pairs of values b 0 , b 1 , b 2 ... of the floor vibration detection signal F. Next, in the CPU 10, the channel changeover means 22 receives a channel changeover control signal C2 from the channel changeover controlling means 25 operating in synchrony with the sampling controlling means 24. This causes the channel changeover means 22 to change over the channel and input the digital weighing signal W into the first digital filtering means 28 on the weighing side and the digital floor vibration detection signal F into the phase correcting means 26 on the AFV side respectively. The digital weighing signal W of the weighing side is filtered by the first digital filtering means 28 to remove the mechanical vibration component and a filtered weighing signal FW is outputted. The digital floor vibration detection signal F of the AFV side is processed by the phase correcting means 26 to produce a phase corrected vibration signal F', which in turn is filtered by the second digital filtering means 30 to remove the mechanical vibration component and a filtered phase corrected floor vibration detection signal FF' is outputted. During the digital conversion of the signals by the digital convertor 8 a phase difference arises between the digital weighing signal W and the floor vibration detection signal F. The phase difference is caused by the gap in time of the sampling of the two signals. If it is assumed that the weighing signal is sampled before the floor vibration detection signal by a time Δt, then the phase difference Δ (rad) of the two signals at a given frequency f becomes: Δ = 2πfΔt If it is assumed that, as in Figures 5a, the sampling timings of the weighing side and the AFV side are staggered by half of the sampling period T (1/fs) of each channel, then: Δt = 1/2fs From Equation (1) the phase difference Δ becomes: Δ = πf/fs In order to nullify this phase difference, the phase correcting means 26 is provided on the AFV side of the circuit, to apply a phase correction to the floor vibration detection signal F. Alternatively the phase correction means 26 may be provided on the weighing side, but in that case a phase gap or shift equivalent to the phase difference is applied to the digital weighing signal W. In this example, the phase correcting means is a linear phase FIR digital filter that carries out a simple-averaging on two floor vibration detection signal values b 0 and b 1 , b 1 and b 2 , b 2 and b 3 .... The phase characteristic F of a linear phase FIR digital filter is given by the general equation: F = -MωT/2 Where (M+1) is made the simple average figure and ω (ω=2πf) the angular frequency. Therefore, in the case of the simple-averaging filtering of the two values, because M=1 F = -ωT/2 = -πf/fs Comparison of equations (3) and (4) shows that this phase change counteracts the effect of the phase difference caused by the sampling in the digital convertor 8. Thus, when simple-averaging processing is carried out on the two AFV side values b 0 and b 1 , b 1 and b 2 , b 2 and b 3 , ..., of the digital floor vibration detection signal F, a phase change occurs ensuring that the signal output by the phase correction means has the same phase as the weighing side values a 0 , a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , ..., of the digital weighing signal W. As a result, because the phase difference arising due to the sampling timing gap between the weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal ceases to exist, it is possible to increase the accuracy of the floor vibration compensation (AFV) when subtracting the floor vibration detection signal from the weighing signal. Figure 6 shows how the averaging of the floor vibration detection signal corrects the phase difference between the two signals. To achieve this, the phase correcting means 26 stores the two most recent values of the floor vibration detection signal F in the memory 27 and then averages these to obtain a resultant phase shifted value which is fed to the filter 30. The phase shifted floor vibration detection signal F' has values b 1 ', b 2 ', b 3 '... whose valves are given by ½(b 0 + b 1 ), ½(b 1 + b 2 ), ½(b 2 + b 3 )... respectively. It is important to realise that whilst this method corrects the phase difference, there is still a difference in the timing of the data. This is highlighted by Figure 7 which shows the signal prior to input to the digital filters 28,30 at point IV. The timing difference arises as a result of it being impossible to calculate the average of b 0 and b 1 (b 1 ') in the phase correction means 26 until the value b 1 has been input to the phase correction means 26. By this time the value a 1 has already been inputted into the digital filter 28. To overcome this problem, the value a 1 is stored in the memory 29 of the digital filter 28 until the filtered signal FF' with a value corresponding to b 1 ' is ready to be output from the digital filter 30. The digital filters 28,30 operate in a conventional manner in conjunction with the memories 29,31. Thus, in the case of the filter 28, each incoming digital value a 0 , a 1 , a 2 , .... of the weighing signal W is stored in the memory 29 to construct a data row of the n most recent values. The filter 28 then outputs a value a 0 , a 1 , a 2 , .... representing the average of the n values currently stored in the memory 29, to make up the filtered weighing signal FW. The filter 30 operates in a similar manner in conjunction with the memory 31 to generate the values b 0 ', b 1 ', b 2 ', .... of the floor vibration detection signal FF'. Next, because the output sensitivities of the weighing cell 2 and the floor vibration detecting cell 4 are different, adjustment of the gain α of the digital floor vibration detection signal FF is carried out by the gain correcting means 32 to correct for this. As a result a gain corrected signal αFF' with values α b 1 ', a b 2 ', α b 3 ',..... is output from the gain correcting means at point V, as shown in Figure 9. Alternatively, the gain correcting means 32 may be provided on the weighing side and gain adjustment of the digital weighing signal FW carried out. Then, subtraction processing is carried out on the filtered signal FW of the weighing cell 2 and the gain-adjusted weighing signal αFF' of the floor vibration detecting cell 4 by the compensating means 34 and a floor vibration corrected signal WS corrected for floor vibration, which is vertical direction displacement of the position in which the weighing cell 2 is disposed, is outputted on the basis of the operation FW-αFF'=WS. As a result, a floor vibration corrected weighing signal WS wherein error of the weighing signal originating in floor vibration has been accurately compensated for is obtained. The actual timing of the phase correction and filtering processes is shown in Figure 8. Initially a value b N-1 is input into the phase correction means 26, step 100. Shortly after this, the value a N of the weighing signal W is input into the digital filter 28 and stored in memory 29, step 110. The value b N is then input into the phase correction means 26, step 120, and the phase corrected signal F' with a value b N ' is output to the digital filter 30, step 130. At this point, the phase correction process repeats itself with an increased value of N. Simultaneously, the digital filters 28,30 filter the respective incoming signals W and F' at step 140. In the case of the weighing signal W, this involves averaging the value a N with the previous n values (a N-n , a N-n+1 , ..... a N-1 ) to produce the filtered weighing signal FW with a value a N . A similar process is repeated in filter 30 to produce the phase corrected filtered floor vibration signal FF' with a value corresponding to b N '. At step 150 the signal FF' undergoes gain correction to produce a signal αFF' with a value α b N '. The values corresponding to α b N ' and a N are then input into the vibration compensator and the signal representing the weight is calculated, step 160. It will be understood that the components of the CPU 10 are controlled in synchrony but for clarity the control lines have been omitted. Although the CPU 10 has been shown in Figure 2 in a hardware form, all or part of the functions performed by the components shown in Figure 2 could be implemented in software. In a second embodiment of the present invention there may be provided a number of weighing cells 202 1 , ....202 m and a corresponding number of floor vibration detection cells 204 1 , ....204 n . In such a situation, the cells will be connected via amplifiers 206 1 , ...206 m , 207 1 ...207 n , and LPFs (low pass filters) 19 to a multi channel change-over device in the form of a multiplexer 208 a and an A/D convertor 208 b , as shown in Figure 10. Thus the floor vibration detection signals F 1 , ...F n obtained from the floor vibration detection cells 204 1 , ...204 n and the weighing signals W 1 , ...W m obtained from the weighing cells 202 1 , ...202 m , will be amplified, low pass filtered and then input into the multiplexer 208 a , in a manner similar to that of the first embodiment of the invention. The multiplexer 208 a and the A/D convertor 208 b sample the signals to produce a single digital output signal λ containing information from all the weighing and floor vibration detection cells. The signal shown in Figure 12 is then input into the CPU 210. one possible design of the CPU 210 is shown in Figure 11. This follows the design of the CPU 10 of Figure 2 in that it includes a channel changeover means 222, sampling controlling means 224 and channel changeover controlling means 225, which operate in a similar manner to the equivalent components of the first embodiment. In contrast to the first embodiment, there is provided a number weighing sides, each one for processing one weighing signal W 1 , ...W m from a weighing cell 202 1 , ...202 m , and a number of AFV sides, each one for processing a floor vibration detection signal F 1 , ...F n from a floor vibration detection cell 204 1 , ...204 n . In operation, as in the first embodiment, it will be necessary to apply a phase correction to each of the signals in order to correct for the phase difference that arises due to the difference in sample timing. This may be achieved by applying a phase correction to each floor vibration detection signal to produce a phase corrected floor vibration detection signal F 1 ', ...F n ' which has a phase equal to the phase of the corresponding weighing signal W 1 , ... W m . The signals are also filtered to produce filtered floor vibration detection signals FF 1 ', ...FF n ' and filtered weighing signals FW 1 , ...FW m and then gain correction would be performed to obtain gain corrected floor vibration detection signals αFF 1 ', ...αFF n '. Assuming that there are an equal number of weighing cells and floor vibration detection cells (i.e. n=m), then the relevant signals can be subtracted from each other, as in the first embodiment, to achieve a number of corrected weighing signals WS 1 , ...WS m (i.e. FW 1 -αFF 1 '=WS 1 ). However, it is preferable to apply a phase correction to all the signals thus bringing all the weighing and floor vibration detection signals in phase. This is again achieved using FIR digital filtering. In order to apply the phase correction it is necessary to take into account the form of the signal λ output from the A/D convertor 208 b , which is shown in Figure 12. The figure shows m weighing signals with values a lo , ...a mo and n floor vibration detection signals with values b lo , ...b no combined from N different channels (i.e. n+m=N) per sampling period T. The sampling then repeats for subsequent periods as shown. Preferably each channel is sampled as frequently as in the first embodiment such that T=1/2fs, in which case t=1/2Nfs. However, if a large number of channels are used, the sampling frequency fs may have to be decreased. The general formula for an FIR digital filter operating in this mode, as will be understood by a person skilled in the art, is given by: X sr = {(s-1) . t/T} * W s(r-1) + {(T-(s-1).t)/T} * W sr where: T = sampling period t = sampling interval between channels s = sampled channel r = number of data points sampled Thus for each channel the phase correction applied is given by the set of equations: X 1r = W 1r X 2r = t/T.W 2(r-1) + (T-t)/T.W 2r X 3r = 2t/T.W 3(r-1) + (T-2t)/T.W 3m : : X Nr = {(N-1).t/T} * W N(r-1) + {(1 - (N-1).t)/T} * W Nr If, as in the first embodiment, the phase correction is achieved by using an average of two signals from the same channel then the equations become: X 12 = W 12 : : X N2 = [(N-1).t/T] x W N1 + [(T-(N-1).t)/T]xW N2 It should be realised that the coefficients of filtering are no longer symmetric, this means that the two signals from a single channel are no longer averaged about their mid-point as in the first embodiment. As a result the sample averaging of the first embodiment is replaced by a weighted average. This situation corresponds to the case when the phase difference between the signals in the first embodiment is no longer: Δt = 1/2fs. Thus the phase characteristic for the filtering is no longer linear. Although this means, in theory, that the phase differences cannot be corrected over all frequencies, it is still effective when the sampling frequency f s is much greater than the vibration frequency f vib . Thus in this case, where the high frequency signals are fully attenuated, the frequencies of the floor vibrations are comparatively low and therefore the non-linearity is of no problem in practical use. After undergoing phase correction, the phase corrected signals are output to the digital filters 228 1 , ...228 m , 230 1 , ...230 n . As in the first embodiment, the phase corrected signals W 1 ', ...W m ', F 1 ', ...F n ' will still have a timing difference, due to the timing of the arrival of the various signals at the phase correcting means. Again this is overcome by holding the signals in the memory 229 1 , ...229 m , 231 1 , ...231 n of the digital filters, until the correct timing is achieved. The signals are then output to the vibration compensating means 234 1 , ...234 m , with the floor vibration detection signals first undergoing gain correction in a gain correction means 232. In the case where there are an equal number of weighing and floor vibration detection cells (n=m), then the gain corrected filtered floor vibration detection signals αFF 1 ', ...αFF m ' are then subtracted from the corresponding weighing signal FW 1 ', ...FW m ' to produce a corrected weighing signal WS 1 , ...WS m . It will be realised by a person skilled in the art that this method could be applied to a system in which there are a number of weighing cells and only a single floor vibration detection cell. In this case it is improtant that after the phase correction and the filtering, all signals have the same phase and the same timing. Then subsequent to the gain correction, the floor vibration detection signal could be removed from each weighing signal to produce a number of corrected weighing signals. Alternatively any number of floor vibration detection cells could be used, with each floor vibration detection signal being subtracted from as many weighing signals as required. There is also provided a third embodiment of the present invention which uses the plurality of weighing cells 202 1 , ...202 m and floor vibration detection cells 204 1 , ...204 n shown in Figure 10. The only difference is the provision of an alternative CPU 310 to replace the CPU 210 of the second embodiment. Figure 13 shows the structure of the alternative CPU 310 which may be substituted for the CPU 210 shown in Figure 11, being different therefrom in the following two aspects. Firstly, this CPU 310 additionally includes a cell sensitivity setting means 315 and a cell sensitivity correcting means 316. The cell sensitivity setting means 315 serves to preliminarily set a cell sensitivity ratio between the weighing cells 202 1 , ...202 m and the floor vibration detection cells 204 1 , ...204 n on the basis of the loads on the floor vibration detection cells 204 1 , ...204 n , the loads on the weighing cells 202 1 , ...202 n and the spring constant of the cells. The cell sensitivity correcting means 316 is for using the cell sensitivity ratio set by the cell sensitivity setting means 315 to thereby correct the floor vibration detection signals F 1 , ...F n generating cell sensitivity corrected signals SF 1 , ...SF n . Secondly, there are further provided a weight sensitivity calculating means 317 and a weight sensitivity correcting means 318, which are for correcting the changes in sensitivity to the floor vibrations due to changes in the applied load. The weight sensitivity calculating means 317 serves to calculate the weight sensitivity ratio between the weighing and the floor vibration detection cells as it changes according to the weights of the objects M 1 , ...M m being weighed. The weight sensitivity correcting means 318 serves to use the weight sensitivity ratio calculated by the weight sensitivity calculating means 317 to correct the displacement signals S 1 -S m outputted from the floor vibration calculating means 313 and to thereby generate weight sensitivity corrected signals SW 1 , ...SW m . It is important to realise that in to achieve optimum results, it is preferable for all the signals input into the digital filters 328 1 , ...328 m , 330 1 , ...330 n to be of the same phase. It is therefore necessary for the weighing signals W 1 , ...W m and the floor vibration detection signals F 1 , ...F n to undergo the phase correction described by the equations (5), (6), (7) to generate phase corrected weighing signals W 1 ', ...W m ' and phase corrected floor vibration detection signals F 1 ', ...F n ,. These signals are then subsequently filtered, to correct the relative timing of the signals, to produce filtered phase corrected weighing signals FW 1 ', ...FW m ' and phase corrected floor vibration detection signals FF 1 ', ...FF n ,. With reference still to Fig. 13, wherein components which are substantially identical to those shown in and explained with reference to Fig. 11 are indicated by numerals increased by 100. Cell sensitivity corrections are performed by the cell sensitivity correcting means 316, and the floor vibration detection signals F 1 , ...F n are converted to the levels of the weight signals W 1 , ...W m by means of the cell sensitivity setting means 315. These converted signals (cell sensitivity corrected signals SF 1 ', ...SF n ') are used by the floor vibration calculating means 313 to calculate the floor vibrations. Further, the weight sensitivity correcting means 318 carries out sensitivity corrections according to the weights of the objects applied to the weighing cells 202 1 , ...202 m thereby outputting weight sensitivity corrected signals SW 1 , ...SW m , which are used by the floor vibration correcting means 334 1 , ...334 m to subtract the vibration components of the floor represented by the weight sensitivity corrected signals SW 1 , ...SW m from the weight signals W 1 , ...W m , thereby obtaining vibration corrected weight signals WS 1 , ...WS m . A fourth embodiment of the present invention is shown in Figure 14. This includes a plurality of weighing cells 402 1 , ....402 7 , and a floor vibration detection cell 404. These cells are connected via amplifiers and low pass filters (not shown) to a channel change-over means consisting of two multiplexers 408a, 409a. The multiplexers are in turn connected to two A/D convertors 408b, 409b, as shown in Figure 14, to produce two output signals λ 1 , λ 2 which are fed into the CPU 410. The CPU 410 can be of the form shown in Figure 11 or Figure 13, the only adaptation that is required would be for the provision of two switching means 422a, 422b to output signals W 1 , W 2 , W 3 , W 4 , W 5 , W 6 , W 7 , F 1 obtained from signals λ 1 , λ 2 to the appropriate weighing signal and floor vibration signal sides. A possible arrangement of the switching means is shown in Figure 15 which also shows the required channel changeover controlling means 425 operating in synchrony with the sampling controlling means 424 in a manner similar to that used in the first example. As will be understood by a person skilled in the art, the higher the rate at which the signals from the weighing and floor vibration detection cells can be sampled, the better the floor vibration compensation will be. There is a finite rate at which it is possible to sample the signals from the cells and therefore in the case where a large number of cells are used, it is preferable to increase the number of A/D convertors used. Increasing the number of convertors from one to two allows the sampling frequency to be increased two-fold whilst the actual sampling rate of each A/D convertor remains constant. A person skilled in the art will realise that although the example in Figure 14 shows seven weighing cells 402 1 , ...402 7 and a single floor vibration detection cell, any number of either type of cell could be used in conjunction with any number of A/D convertors to achieve the required sampling rate. A person skilled in the art will realise that there are many different combinations of these embodiments that could be utilized without departing from the scope of the current invention.

Claims: A weighing apparatus comprising: a weighing cell (2) for weighing an article to be weighed and outputting a weighing signal corresponding to the weight thereof; a floor vibration detecting cell (4) for detecting vibration of a floor on which the weighing cell (2) is installed and for outputting a floor vibration detection signal; means (8a) for sampling the weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal selectively at a predetermined sampling frequency; an A/D convertor (8b) for converting each of the sampled signals into a digital weighing signal (W) or a digital floor vibration detection signal (F) respectively; first digital filtering means (28) for filtering the digital weighing signal; second digital filtering means (30) for filtering the digital floor vibration detection signal; floor vibration compensating means (34) for subtracting the filtered digital floor vibration detection signal from the filtered digital weighing signal and outputting a floor vibration compensated signal wherein error of the weighing signal caused by floor vibration is compensated for; and phase correcting means (26) for applying a phase correction to the weighing signal or the floor vibration detection signal before or after filtering to nullify a phase difference caused by a difference in the times at which the weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal are sampled. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the A/D convertor (8b) the sampling means (8a) are provided in a common digital convertor (8). A weighing apparatus according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the sampling means samples the weighing signal and the floor vibration detection signal alternately. Apparatus according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the phase correcting means (26) nullifies the phase difference caused by the gap of sampling timing by simple-averaging the sampled weighing signal or floor vibration detection signal. Apparatus according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the apparatus includes a single A/D convertor.

Inventors: TAJIRI SHOKO, WAKASA YUKIO, TAJIRI, SHOKO, WAKASA, YUKIO, Tajiri, Shoko, c/o Ishida Co., Ltd., Wakasa, Yukio, c/o Ishida Co., Ltd.,
Applicants: ISHIDA SEISAKUSHO, ISHIDA CO., LTD.
Application year: 1996
Main classification: G01G23
IPC codes: G01G23