COMPETITIVE BINDING ASSAY

Abstract: A competitive binding assay kit and process for the immunological detection of a blood antigen of specified phenotype (for example phenotypes of human platelet antigen HPA) in a sample of whole blood. The kit contains a substrate having substantially pure blood antigen of specified phenotype immobilised thereon, antibody specific to said blood antigen and means for enabling detection of antibody bound to said blood antigen. The process comprises mixing a sample of whole blood with a predetermined amount of antibody, so as to bind the antibody to any antigen present in the sample of whole blood and bringing the mixture into contact with the immobilised antigen so as to bind any remaining unbound antibody to the immobilised antigen, and determining the amount of immobilised antigen, and determining the amount of immobilised complex and consequently the specified blood antigen phenotype.

Description: COMPETITIVE BIMDING ASSAY Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a competitive binding assay kit and process for the immunological detection of a presence of a blood antigen of specified phenotype (for example phenotypes of HPA) in a sample of whole blood. Background of the Invention Human Platelet Antigen 1 (HPA1) , also known as PLA1, is a polymorphic determinant on the glycoprotein (GP) lib/Ilia complex, that resides at the N-terminal region of GPIIIa. The great majority of the Caucasian population is homozygous or heterozygous for HPAla (about 72% and 26% respectively) (1) . However, 2-3% of the population is homozygous for HPAlb (PLA1 negative) putting them at risk from developing antibodies to HPAla either during pregnancy or following transfusion with blood containing HPAla platelets. For example, HPAlb pregnant women carrying HPAla positive babies may produce anti-HPAla antibodies which could lead to foetal or neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FAITP or NAITP) respectively, with 50% of the cases occurring at first pregnancy. One outcome of FAITP/NAITP, which has a frequency of 1 in 1000-2000 births, is intracranial haemorrhage with 6.5-10% mortality and 20% morbidity (neurological sequelae) (2) . Moreover, HPAlb individuals (mostly elderly multi- parous women) transfused with blood containing HAPla platelets may develop post-transfusion purpura (PTP) which is characterised with severe thrombocytopenia, 5-10 days following the transfusion. Although not as common as NAITP (only about 200 cases reported world-wide) , PTP is nevertheless associated with 10-20% morbidity/mortality (3). The treatment and management of FAITP/NAITP and PTP relies basically on several infusions of intra-venous IgG with or without transfusion with HPAlb platelets. In view of the serious or fatal outcomes of FAITP/NAITP and PTP and their increasingly effective treatment, antenatal screening for HPAlb is becoming widely accepted as an important prophylactic measure (4,5) . For such wide-scale screening, established assays such as monoclonal antibody immobilisation of platelet antigens (MAIPA) , platelet suspension immunofluorescence test, or flow cytometry are not suitable due to their technical or financial burdens (6-8) . Recently, Metcalfe et al reported a simplified method for large-scale HPAla phenotyping for antenatal screening which was adapted from MAIPA (9) . However, the Metcalf et al assay relies on the extraction of glycoprotein GPIIb/IIIa antibody complex from platelets pre-incubated with the antibody. The assay is also considerably time consuming requiring a number of incubation and centrifugation steps. There is thus a requirement for an immunoassay which does not require a sample of whole blood to be substantially purified. It is an object of the present invention to obviate and/or mitigate some of the above disadvantages. Generally speaking the present invention provides a simple and potentially automatable competitive binding assay and assay kit for determining the presence in vitro of a specified blood antigen (for instance HPAla) in a sample of whole blood. It is generally based on the surprising feature that the assay is able to determine a presence or absence of a specified blood antigen in a sample of whole blood. It might have been expected that cells and other species normally present in whole blood would interfere with such an assay. Summary of the Invention The present invention provides in a first aspect a method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay for determining in vitro the presence of a specified blood antigen phenotype in a sample of whole blood, which comprises: mixing the sample of whole blood with a predetermined amount of antibody specific to said blood antigen phenotype, so as to bind the antibody to any of said antigen present in the sample of whole blood; - bringing the mixture into contact with a substrate upon which antigen of said phenotype has been immobilised such as to bind any remaining unbound antibody to said immobilised antigen, thereby forming an immobilised antigen-antibody complex; washing the immobilised antigen-antibody complex and; estimating the amount of immobilised complex and consequently the specified blood antigen phenotype. The present invention in a further aspect provides a competitive binding immunoassay kit for determining the presence of a specified blood antigen phenotype in a sample of whole blood which, comprises; a substrate having immobilised thereon substantially pure blood antigen of said phenotype. a supply of antibody for specifically binding to said antigen, and - means for enabling detection of said specifically bound antibody. The immunoassay of the present invention is described as a competitive binding immunoassay essentially because any blood antigen of said specified phenotype present in the whole blood sample competes with said immobilised antigen, for the predetermined amount of antibody. The immunoassay can be used to detect the presence of any suitable intrinsic blood cell antigen of a specified phenotype (excluding foreign species such as viral antigens etc) . The blood antigens include antigenic determinants on platelet glycoproteins, in particular HPA1 antigen of la or lb phenotype. Other antigens which are also suitable are glycoproteins or other determinants on blood cells, particularly white blood cells (such as granulocytes) . The sample of whole blood may be obtained fresh from an individual to be tested, or the blood may be from whole blood stored up to 25 days at 4°C (for example citrated or EDTA whole blood) . The whole blood sample may be used untreated, or alternatively the whole blood sample can be subjected to a washing step prior to testing (e.g. by diluting the blood, centrifuging it and resuspending in a buffer) . Typically, a sample of serum containing a high titre of antibody specific to said blood antigen may be employed in the immunoassay. Alternatively a monoclonal antibody specific to said blood antigen could be used. The substrate upon which said substantially pure antigen of said phenotype is immobilised, can be any suitable substrate known in the art. Typically this can be paper, plastics such as nitrocellulose, or glass (e.g. microscope slides) . Most preferably the substrate is a well of a plastics microtitre plate, as commonly employed in immunoassays. The antigen to be immobilised is preferably substantially pure. That is, the antigen is purified away from other blood antigens or blood components that could affect the immunoassay. It is important that the antigen be substantially pure if the antibody used is in a serum sample. This is to prevent any additional antibodies that may be present in the serum sample, from binding to their respective blood antigen. If a monoclonal antibody is employed, it may not be necessary to highly purify the antigen, depending on the degree of cross-reactivity of the monoclonal antibody which should be specific to its specified antigen. The antigen used should be purified from a blood source, different to that being tested. This is to minimise any further antigen-antibody complexes which may be formed, from interfering with the immunoassay. Typically a number of immune (i.e. antigen-antibody) complexes may be formed when bringing the mixture into contact with the substrate, for instance; a) specified antibody and immobilised antigen, b) specified antibody and antigen present in the whole blood, and c) non-specifically bound unspecified antibody to immobilised antigen. The washing serves to remove all complexes except the specified antibody and immobilised antigen complex. The mixing of the sample of whole blood with antibody and the bringing the mixture into contact with the substrate can be carried out concurrently, or alternatively as two separate steps. Generally, the substrate bound immune complex is estimated by means of anti-human IgG or IgM labelled with an appropriate label, such as an enzyme label (e.g. horseradish peroxidase HRP) , a radiolabel, a fluorescence label or other labelling system known in the art. Using an enzyme label, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) may be provided which is sensitive, specific, cheap, quick and could potentially be used for large scale automated screening for whole blood antigens. Advantageously, it has been found that the incubations involved in the production of the immune complex, and the estimation thereof with labelled antibody can be carried out at room temperature and so do not require the use of an incubator. It is envisaged that a particularly preferred immunoassay would involve detection of HPAla antigen. The antigenic determinant for HPAla is present on the GPIIIa subunit, so that a competitive binding immunoassay to detect the presence HPAla antigen in a whole blood sample, would include immobilised HPAla antigen. Typically this can be HPAla typed platelets (which have been previously genotyped, for instance by using the technique described in Williamson, et al (13)), purified glycoprotein complex GPIIb/IIIa (prepared, for example, by the process described in Bessos et al (10)), purified glycoprotein GPIIIa, or synthetically manufactured HPAla antigen. In a particularly preferred embodiment of the first aspect, the present invention provides a method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay for df-termining in vitro the presence of HPAla antigen in a sample of whole blood, which comprises; - mixing the sample of whole blood with a predetermined amount of anti-HPAla antibody, so as to bind the antibody to any HPAla antigen present in the sample of whole blood; - bringing the mixture into contact with a substrate upon which HPAla antigen has been immobilised, such as to bind remaining anti-HPAla antibody to the immobilised HPAla antigen, thereby forming an immobilised HPAla antigen - anti-HPAla antibody complex; - washing the immobilised HPAla antigen - anti-HPAla antibody complex; and estimating the amount of immobilised complex and consequently HPAla antigen. In a particularly preferred embodiment of the further aspect, the present invention provides a competitive binding immunoassay kit for determining the presence of HPAla antigen in a sample of whole blood which comprises; a multiwell microtitre plate or plates having a well containing immobilised substantially pure HPAla antigen; a supply of anti-HPAla antibody for specifically binding to said HPAla antigen, and means for enabling detection of said specifically bound antibody. Typically, each well contains 0.05μg to 0.5μg of antigen per well; preferably O.lμg of antigen per well. The substrate upon which HPAla antigen has been immobilised is generally blocked with a non-specific protein mixture, such as bovine serum albumin prior to bringing the mixture into contact with the substrate. Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only, with reference to the Figures which show; Figure 1 shows the distinction between HPAla positive and negative GP extracts, using anti-serum T. Figure 2 shows the distinction between HPAla positive and negative platelets, using anti-serum T and anti-serum C. Figure 3 shows the distinction between HPAla positive and negative samples using fresh and stored whole blood. Figure 4 shows an assessment of the competitive binding assay performance using 33 previously genotyped blood samples, compared to positive and negative controls. Figure 5 shows a representative set of assay results obtained from a study of 475 blood samples. Example 1: Purification of GPIIb/IIIa. The various reagents used were of the Analar grade and were purchased from ICN(UK) , Sigma(UK) , or Aldrich Chemicals Ltd, (UK) . Anti-HPAla sera were obtained from mothers of babies with NAITP. HRP-conjugated sheep anti- human IgG was provided by the Scottish Antibody Production Unit, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) , Boseral, was purchased from Organon Technika (Holland) . Synthetic peptides and CNBr activated Sepharose 4B were purchased from Calbiochem/Novabioche (UK) and Pharmacia Ltd. (UK) respectively. Genotyped platelets (either separated and washed or in whole blood) were used to assess the performance of the new CB assay. Platelet membrane glycoprotein GPIIb/IIIa was extracted and purified essentially as described before (10, 11). Briefly, a unit of HPAlala, HPAlalb, or HPAlblb apheresed platelet concentrate (PC) was washed and extracted with lOOmM octylglucopyranoside and 2mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride in buffer containing 50mM Tris/HCl and 150mM NaCl, pH7.5 (TBS). The extract was supplemented with cations and mixed end-over-end with 2g of immobilised synthetic peptide GRGDSPK (at 12mg peptide/g Sepharose 4B) overnight at β C. The Sepharose beads were then centrifuged (1,000 rpm for 5min at room temperature), and the supernatant removed. The GPIIb/IIIa adsorbed beads were washed several times before eluting with cation enriched buffer (ImM MgCl 2 and ImM MnCl 2 ) containing synthetic peptide GRGDSP. The eluate was dialysed twice at 4°C against a litre of Tris/HCl buffer (lOmM Tris/HCl, 150mM NaCL pH7.4) and stored frozen in aliquots at -40°C until needed. Typically, about lmg of GPIIb/IIIa was removed from each unit of apheresed PC with 95% purity. Example 2: Determination of a suitable anti-HPAla serum and its ability to distinguish between soluble GPIIb/IIIa of different HPA phenotypes. The binding of three anti-HPAla sera to coated HPAlala was assessed in serial doubling dilutions, of which only two (C and T) exhibited satisfactory binding (data not shown) (10) . Limiting antibody dilutions giving 50% maximum binding (1:40 for both antisera) were used to develop the CB assay. In the first instance, antibody binding in the presence of serial doubling dilutions of soluble HPAlala and HPAlblb GP (starting at 4ug/ml) was compared. Both antisera (C and T) were found to distinguish between the two phenotypes. Example 3: Competitive binding fCB. assay. The whole blood or platelet samples obtained from normal volunteers were washed or diluted in platelet wash buffer consisting of 148mM NaCl, 5mM glucose, 0.6mM EDTA, and 20mM Tris, pH7.4. The washing of microtitre plate wells in the ELISA was carried out in ELISA wash buffer consisting of l37mM NaCl, 1.5mM KH 2 P0 4 , 8.ImM Na 2 HP0 4 . 12H 2 , 2.7mM KC1, and 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.5. The basic coating, blocking, washing, and colour development procedures of the CB ELISA were as described previously (10,12). Maxisorp immuno-plates IF (A/S Nunc, Denmark) were coated with lOOμl/well of purified HPAlala GPIIb/IIIa at lμg/ml overnight at 4°C and blocked with 5% BSA (in coating buffer) for lhr at room temperature (RT) [wells with coating buffer but without GPIIb/IIIa were included as controls for background binding] . Initially, for determining a suitable anti-HPAla serum, the wells were washed with ELISA wash buffer and sera added in triplicate in serial doubling dilutions, at lOOμl/well and incubated for lhr. The results were plotted on a graph (data not shown) and this resulted in a sigmoid curve, from which the dilution of antibody giving 50% maximum binding could be determined. This "limiting" antibody amount would enable competition between cellular HPAla antigen and the coated antigen for the antibody. For development of the CB assay, purified GPIIb/IIIa, citrated or EDTA whole blood at 1:10 in platelet wash buffer (i.e. 1:20 once mixed with antibody - see below), or washed platelets in platelet wash buffer (all of various phenotyopes) , were added in triplicate to the wells at 50μl/well. The wells were then supplemented with 50μl/well of anti-HPAla serum at 1:20 in ELISA wash buffer (i.e. 1:40 final dilution) and the plate gently shaken (rotatest Shaker, Luckham, UK) for lhr at RT. This allows competition between coated HPAla GPIIb/IIIa and its corresponding phenotype on the soluble GP or platelets (either separated or in whole blood) for the predetermined amount of anti-HPAla serum. The same HPA phenotype (HPAla) present in a sample would significantly inhibit the binding of the antibody to the immobilised antigen in the wells, whereas HPAlb would not. After the incubation, the plates were washed by squirting ELISA wash buffer 3X100 μl/well up to ten times. Anti-HPAla antibody bound to the wells was detected by incubation with HRP-conjugated sheep anti- human IgG at 1:400 in ELISA wash buffer (lOOμl/well) , before washing and developing the colour as previously described (12) . Specific binding was obtained by subtracting the absorbence in wells coated with buffer only from those coated with purified GPIIb/IIIa. Example 4: CB assay using GP extracted from platelets with different HPAl phenotypes. Non-purified extracts obtained from phenotyped washed platelets (by Octyl glucopyranoside detergent extraction as mentioned above) were tested in the CB assay in serial doubling dilutions (starting at 1:10). As shown in Fig 1 there was a clear distinction between HPAlala or HPAlalb and HPAlblb GP extracts indicating the suitability of the assay for determining platelet phenotypes using extracted GP. Example 5: CB assay using washed platelets from HPAla and HPAlb volunteers. Citrated blood samples (10ml) obtained from an HPAla and an HPAlb volunteer were centrifuged at 750g for 10 minutes, RT, and the buffy coat removed, washed twice with platelet wash buffer, resuspended in wash buffer to similar platelet count, and tested in serial dilutions of 10X. HPAla platelets caused significant inhibition of antibody binding, while HPAlb platelet showed none (Figure 2) . Since antiserum T consistently showed a better distinction between the two phenotypes, it was chosen for routine use in the CB assay. Repeats of this experiment indicated that variation within normal platelet count was not critical to the observed distinction between the two phenotypes (data not shown) . Example 6: CB assay using fresh and stored citrated or EDTA whole blood obtained from HPAla and HPAlb volunteers. Once the applicability of the assay was tested with extracted GP and intact platelets, its applicability to non-manipulated whole blood was investigated. Both citrated and EDTA whole blood was obtained from an HPAla and an HPAlb volunteer and stored at 4 β C, and tested at 1:10 in platelet wash buffer at various intervals of time. As shown in Figure 3, the specific absorbence using HPAla blood was consistently distinct from HPAlb blood up to day 7 of storage. The procedure described in example 3 was followed, with the following exceptions: the wells were washed 7X after incubation with blood on days l and 2, and 10X for the rest of the storage period in order to improve the relatively inferior performance of the assay on citrated blood on the first two days. Example 7: Assessment of CB assay performance bv testing genotyped samples blind. In order to assess the performance of the assay three sets of different tests were carried out at different times using blind samples obtained from the Cambridge Regional Blood Transfusion Centre. These samples consisted of EDTA blood genotyped as described in a recent review article by Williamson et al. (13). The assay procedure according to example 3 was followed to assay blood samples at 1:10 dilution using anti-serum T. In each test HPAla positive and negative controls stored at 4°C were included. In the first test the controls were 3 day old blood samples. In the second test the controls were 8 day old blood samples. In the third test the controls were 15 day old samples. The CB assay exhibited a very satisfactory performance (Figure 4) correctly determining the phenotypes of all samples, including 6 HPAlb samples (nos. 1 and 4, first test; nos. 2, 8, 14, second test; and no. 12, third test). Following these experiments, the assay was altered to maximise the signal to noise ratio by the addition of an initial whole blood washing step: 5ml blood at 1:10 diluted in platelet wash buffer is spun at 750g for 10 minutes at room temperature, and the cells resuspended in 1ml platelet wash buffer (see Figure 5 for improvement in signal to noise ratio) . Example 8: A comparative study of the CB assay against the Caoture-P kit assay*. The CB assay of the present invention was compared against the commercially available Capture-P kit assay (Immucor Inc., U.S.A.) . The procedure according to example 3 was followed together with a preliminary washing step of whole blood using a 1:10 dilution in platelet wash buffer. 475 samples were tested and the CB assay and Capture-P kit assay were in 100% agreement (468 HPAla positive and 7 HPAla negative) . The mean absorbances of HPAla and HPAlb samples were 0.12 (SD 0.08) and 0.49 (SD 0.16) respectively, P<0.0005, Student's t test (Figure 5a). An example of the histograms obtained using the CB assay is shown in Figure 5b, where sample number 3 is clearly HPAlb. (Positive and negative imply HPAla positive and HPAla negative [i.e. HPAlb], controls respectively). Controls in these series of tests comprised HPAla or HPAlb whole blood stored for up to 25 days at 4 C (preliminary results also showed that soluble HPA la and lb GP could serve as alternative controls - data not shown) . Although there was background binding in the CB assay (in wells not coated with antigen) , it was possible to obtain a clear distinction between HPAla positive and negative platelet phenotypes. Generally two factors appear critical for this distinction: firstly, the use of a strong anti-HPAl antiserum; and secondly, excessive washing of wells at the end of incubation with whole blood. The excessive washing was required not only to remove non- specifically bound IgG but also any bound anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies which may be present occasionally in some samples (such as those obtained from immune thrombocytopenia patients) . Such antibodies are probably not as strong as the anti-HPAla antibody and thus may not pose a problem in the assay. The present assay is ideally suited for large scale screening of antenatal samples for the following reasons; it only requires the use of non-manipulated blood; it incorporates only small amounts of anti-HPAla serum (2.5μl/well) ; and is easily automatable. Large scale screening should detect mothers at risk from FAITP or NAITP so that they could be followed closely during pregnancy to detect signs of foetal thrombocytopenia with or without the emergence of anti-HPAla antibodies. REFERENCES 1. Newman P: Platelet GPIIb/IIIa: molecular variations and alloantigenε. Thromb. Haemost. 66: 111, 1991. 2. Mueller-Eckhardt C, Mueller-Eckhardt G, Willen-Ohff H, Horz A, Kuenzlen E, O'Neill GJ, Schendel DJ; Immunogenecity of and immune response to the human platelet antigen Zw* is strongly associated with HLA-B8 and DR3. Tissue Antigens 26:71, 1985. 3. Mueller-Eckhardt C: Post-transfusion Purpura. Br.J. Haematol. 64: 419, 1986. 4. Gafni A, Blanchette, VS: Screening for neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: an economic perspective. In: Current Studies in Haematology and Blood Transfusion (eds. Decary F, Rock G) , 140. Karger, Basel, 1988. 5. Waters A, Murphy M, Hambley H, Nicolaides K; Management of allommune thrombocytopenia in the fetus and neonate. In: Clinical and Basic Science Aspects of Immunohaematology (ed. Nance SJ) , 155. American Association of Blood Banks, Arlignton, VA, 1991. 6. Borne Kr Von Dem DEG, VER Heught FWA, OosterhofF, Riesz Von E, Brutel de la Riviere A, Engelfriet CP: A simple immunofluorescence test for the detection of platelet antibodies. Br. J. Haematol. 39; 195, 1978. 7. Freedman J, Hornstein A: Simple method for differentiating between HLA and platelet specific antibodies by flow cytometry. Am. J. Haematol. 38: 314, 1991. 8. Kiefel V: The MAIPA assay and its application in immunohaematology. Transfusion Med. 2. 181, 1992. 9. Metcalfe P, Doughty HA, Murphy MF, Waters H: A simplified method for large -scale HPA-la phenotyping for antenatal screening. Transfusion Med. 4: 21, 1994. 10. Bessos H, Goldschmeding R, Borne Von Dem AKR, Atkinson A, Murphy WG: The development of a simple and quick enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for anti-HPAla (PLA1) antibodies. Thromb. Res. 69: 395, 1993. 11. Kirchhofer D, Pierschbacher MD, Ginsberg MH, Plow EF< Ruoslahti E: Platelet membrane glycoprotein lib/Ilia: a member of a family of Arg-Gly-Asp-specific adhesion receptors. Science 231: 1559, 1990. 12. Bessos H, Murphy WG: A new competitive binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for glycocalicin in plasma and platelet concentrate supernatants. Thromb. Res . 59 : 497 , 1990. 13. Williamson LM, Bruce D, Lubenko A, Chana HJ, Ouwehand WH: Molecular biology for platelet allantigen typing. Transfusion Med. 2: 255, 1992.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay for determining in vitro the presence of a specified blood antigen phenotype in a sample of whole blood, which comprises: mixing the sample of whole blood with a predetermined amount of antibody specific to said blood antigen phenotype, so as to bind the antibody to any of said antigen present in the sample of whole blood; bringing the mixture into contact with a substrate upon which antigen of said phenotype has been immobilised such as to bind any remaining unbound antibody to said immobilised antigen, thereby forming an immobilised antigen - antibody complex; - washing the immobilised antigen-antibody complex and; estimating the amount of immobilised complex and consequently the specified blood antigen phenotype. 2. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to claim 1 wherein the whole blood is washed prior to mixing with antibody. 3. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to either of claims 1 or 2 wherein the antibody is provided by a sample of serum containing a high titre of antibody specific to said blood antigen. 4. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to either of claims 1 or 2 wherein the antibody is a monoclonal antibody specific to said blood antigen. 5. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to any preceding claim wherein the substrate is a well of a plastics microtitre plate. 6. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to any preceding claim wherein the antigen to be immobilised is substantially pure and as such is purified away from other blood antigens or blood components. 7. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to claim 6 wherein the antigen to be immobilised is purified from a blood source, different to that being tested. 8. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to any preceding claim wherein the mixing of the sample of whole blood with antibody and the bringing the mixture into contact with the substrate are carried out concurrently. 9. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to any of claims 1 to 7 wherein the mixing of the sample of whole blood with antibody and the bringing the mixture into contact with the substrate are carried out as two separate steps. 10. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to any preceding claim wherein the substrate bound immune complex is estimated by means of an anti-human antibody labelled with an appropriate label, selected from the group consisting of an enzyme label, a radiolabel, or a fluorescence label. 11. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to any preceding claim wherein the method is carried out at roo 'temperature. 12. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to any preceding claim wherein the immunoassay detects the presence of HPAla antigen in a whole blood sample and includes immobilised HPAla antigen. 13. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay according to claim 12 wherein the immobilised HPAla antigen is selected from the group consisting of HPAla typed platelets, purified glycoprotein complex GPIIb/IIIa, purified glycoprotein GPIIIa, or synthetically manufactured HPAla antigen. 14. A method of performing a competitive binding immunoassay for determining in vitro the presence of HPAla antigen in a sample of whole blood, which comprises: mixing the sample of whole blood with a predetermined amount of anti-HPAla antibody, so as to bind the antibody to any HPAla antigen present in the sample of whole blood; bringing the mixture into contact with a substrate upon which HPAla antigen has been immobilised, such as to bind remaining anti-HPAla antibody to the immobilised HPAla antigen, thereby forming an immobilised HPAla antigen-anti-HPAla antibody complex; washing the immobilised HPAla antigen-anti-HPAla antibody complex; and estimating the amount of immobilised complex and consequently HPAla antigen phenotype. 15. A competitive binding immunoassay kit for determining the presence of a specified blood antigen phenotype in a sample of whole blood which, comprises; - a substrate having immobilised thereon substantially pure blood antigen of said phenotype; a supply of antibody for specifically binding to said antigen, and means for enabling detection of said specifically bound antibody. 16. A competitive binding immunoassay kit for determining the presence of HPAla antigen in a sample of whole blood which comprises; a multiwell microtitre plate or plates having a well containing immobilised substantially pure HPAla antigen; a supply of anti-HPAla antibody for specifically binding to said HPAla antigen, and means for enabling detection of said specifically bound antibody. 17. A competitive binding immunoassay kit according to claim 16 wherein each we contains 0.05μg to 0.5μg of antigen per well. 18. A competitive binding immunoassay kit according to either of claims 16 or 17 wherein the substrate upon which HPAla antigen has been immobilised has been blocked with a non¬ specific protein mixture prior to bringing the mixture into contact with the substrate.

Inventors: BESSOS HAGOP, MURPHY WILLIAM GERRARD, BESSOS, HAGOP, MURPHY, WILLIAM, GERRARD
Applicants: BESSOS HAGOP, COMMON SERVICES AGENCY, MURPHY WILLIAM GERRARD, BESSOS, HAGOP, MURPHY, WILLIAM, GERRARD
Application year: 1996
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: G01N33