SELECTIVE INACTIVATION OF ENZYME ACTIVITIES

Abstract: A method for inactivation at least one undesirable enzyme in a mixture of enzymes containing a desirable enzyme, obtained by varying pH, temperature and holding time.

Description: SELECTIVE INACTIVATION OF ENZYME ACTIVITIES TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a method for inactivation of one or more undesirable enzymes in a mixture of enzymes containing a desirable enzyme. BACKGROUND ART It is well known m the art that when fermenting a microorganism in order to obtain a desirable enzyme, one or more undesirable enzymes are often also expressed by said microor¬ ganism. If these undesirable enzymes are not effectively inactivated they may cause huge stability problems during recovery of the desirable enzyme and/or during storage of the desirable enzyme. Even if these other enzymes do not cause stability problems they may indeed be unwanted as industry for many purposes requires a "pure" enzyme without side-activities. In order to solve the above mentioned problem many suggestions have been put forward: Hoerle et al . disclose m US 4,086,139 use of hypochlorite and chlorite ions to inactivate amylase in an amylase-protease mixture; Bock et al . describe in DD 216 955 that polygalacturonases may be removed from a pectinase mixture by adding urea, and DeStefanis et al disclose in EP 021 179 that Bacillus proteases may be inactivated in a protease-amylase mixture by adjusting the system to a pH between 5.0 and 7.0, buffering said mixture with a buffering agent, and heating said mixture to a temperature of from 40°C to 75°C. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for inactivation of undesirable enzymes in a mixture of enzymes which method should have short process times, result m high yields, and at the same time be simple, inexpensive and compatible to industrial requirements. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It has surprisingly been found that many undesirable enzymes may be effectively inactivated by use of the present invention. Accordingly, the invention relates to a method for inactivation at least one undesirable enzyme m a mixture of enzymes containing a desirable enzyme comprising the steps of a) holding the mixture at a temperature of from 2°C to 75°C at a pH below 5.0 for a period of at least 20 sec; and/or b) holding the mixture at a temperature of from 2°C to 75°C at a pH above 9.0 for a period of at least 20 sec. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS The present invention is further illustrated by reference to the accompanying drawings, in which Fig. 1 shows the lipase activity versus inactivation time at pH 3.5 and at 45°C (I) , at 50°C (II) , at 55°C (III) and at 70°C (IV) , the experiments performed as described m Example 1. Fig. 2 shows the protease activity versus inactivation time at pH 3.5 and at 45°C (I) , at 50°C (II) , at 55°C (III) and at 70°C (IV) , the experiments performed as described m Example 1. Fig. 3 shows a stability test with an untreated sample (I) and a sample subjected to pH 3.5 at 45°C for 60 minutes (II) , the experiment conducted as described in Example 1. Fig. 4 shows the lipase activity versus inactivation time at pH 3.5 and at 45°C (I) , at 50°C (II) , at 55°C (III) , at 60°C (IV) and at 70°C (V) , the experiments performed as described m Example 2. Fig. 5 shows the protease activity versus inactivation time at pH 3.5 and at 45°C (I) , at 50°C (II) , at 55°C (III) , at 60°C (IV) and at 70°C (V) , the experiments performed as described in Example 2. Fig. 6 shows stability tests with three different lipase samples: a sample treated at pH 2.5 at 20°C for 60 minutes (I) , a sample treated at pH 10.7 at 20°C for 60 minutes (II) and an untreated sample (III) , the experiments conducted as described in Example 3. DETAILED DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method for inactivation at least one undesirable enzyme m a mixture of enzymes containing a desirable enzyme comprising the steps of a) holding the mixture at a temperature of from 2°C to 75°C at a pH below 5.0 for a period of at least 20 sec ; and/or b) holding the mixture at a temperature of from 2°C to 75°C at a pH above 9.0 for a period of at least 20 sec. The principle we use in the present invention is that an enzyme normally either is able to tolerate acidic (pH below 5.0} or alkaline conditions (pH above 9.0) . We combine this fact with the temperature tolerance of the enzyme in question (2°C to 75°C) and the time we hold the enzyme mixture at said conditions in order to get the optimum conditions where most of the desirable enzyme is maintained and most of the undesirable enzyme is inactivated. So the method operates in a system where three parameters can be varied: the pH, the temperature and the holding It may in some cases be an advantage to add a stabilizer, which stabilize the desirable enzyme; this stabilizer should be added before the method of the invention is used. Examples of such stabilizers are inhibitors, co-factors or substrates for the desirable enzyme: It is well known m the art that when an enzyme is bound to an inhibitor, to a co-factor or to a substrate (e.g. carboxy ethylcellulose (CMC)) it becomes more stable. An example, wherein CMC is used, is given m Example 7. It may also m some cases be an advantage to add a destabilizer, which destabilize the undesirable enzyme; this destabilizer should be added before the method of the invention is used Useful destabilizers may be complexing agents, m particular metal ion complexing agents such as EDTA and EGTA. Furthermore, it may m some cases be an advantage both to add a stabilizer, which stabilize the desirable enzyme, and a destabilizer, which destabilize the undesirable enzyme Undesirable enzymes A very common undesirable class of enzymes is the proteolytic enzymes (proteases, peptidases) as they are able to degrade proteins, and as enzymes are proteins, proteolytic enzymes are able to degrade the desired enzyme. However, really all enzymes obtained from e g animals, plants or microorganisms, may be undesirable as the industry is asking for more and more "pure" enzymes, or "mono-component" enzymes, i.e , any enzyme activity but the desired, is unwanted So undesirable enzymes may be any enzyme, in particular an enzyme selected from the group consisting of lipases, amylases, cellulases, oxidoreductases, xylanases, lsomerases, peptidases and proteases . Desirable enzymes Any enzyme obtainable from, e g., a microorganism, an animal or a plant may be desirable In particular an enzyme selected from the group consisting of lipases, amylases, cellulases, oxidoreductases, xylanases, lsomerases, peptidases and proteases is preferred. The method of the invention is especially useful when the desirable enzyme is obtainable from a microorganism, an animal or a plant, in particular from a fungus, preferably a filamentous fungus such as Aspergillus, e.g , A oryzae, A niger, or Humicola, e.g., H. insolens. Especially when the desirable enzyme is cloned into a filamentous fungus such as Aspercrillus or Humicola, there is today a problem in getting rid of undesirable enzymes, typically traces of protease activity The amount of the undesirable enzymes present is typically very low, often not detectable with standard methods, but as the cloned enzyme is not used to these enzymes - even very small amounts of these undesirable enzymes make the cloned (= the desirable) enzyme unstable. By using the method of the invention it is possible to inactivate these very small amounts of proteolytic activity, whereby a product with a very good stability may be obtained (for reference see Example 1) . Mixture of enzymes The method of the invention may be used on any mixture of enzymes which contains at least two enzymes. The method is particularly useful when the mixture of enzymes is a culture (= fermentation) broth. The method of the invention may be applied to an untreated culture broth (whole culture broth) , to a homogenized culture broth, or to a whole or homogenized culture broth that has been subjected to, e.g., a water dilution and/or one or more solid/liquid separatory techniques such as flocculation, centrifugation, filtration, e.g., drumflltration or filter press filtration, or membrane separation, optionally followed by a membrane concentration or evaporation. According to the invention the membrane concentration may be performed using any membrane equipment known in the art, but it is preferred that the membrane concentration is done using ultrafiltration techniques such as hollow fiber, spiral rounds or plate and frame units. The preferred cut off value will depend on the properties of the enzyme in question but usually a cut off value m the interval of from 1 to 100 kD is preferred. The enzyme solution may further be purified in a variety of ways such as by using filtration, chromatographic methods, adsorption and/or precipitation/crystallization processes before the undesirable enzyme activities are inacti¬ vated according to the invention. If the desirable enzyme is very unstable it may be advisable to inactivate the undesirable enzyme (s) as soon as possible after fermentation, typically after a filtration, e g , after a centrifugation or a drumflltration. If the desirable enzyme is less unstable it may be an advantage to wait with the inactivation until the fermentation broth has been purified and concentrated; typically after a filtration and an ultrafiltration has taken place After the inactivation according to the invention has taken place the enzyme product is processed in the usual way, l e. it may be further purified in a variety of ways such as by using filtration, concentration, chromatographic methods, adsorption and/or precipitation/crystallization processes. In some cases the undesirable enzyme (s) are just inactivated, m other cases it may be an advantage to inactivate and remove the undesirable enzyme (s) The removal of the undesirable enzyme (ε) is typically done by a solid/liquid operation. Use of the method When having a mixture of enzymes containing a desirable enzyme and one or more undesirable enzymes, it is advisable first to look at the pH-curve for the desirable enzyme and see whether it has optimum to the alkaline or the acidic side. If the desirable enzyme has optimum to the acidic side, it means that it is normally not destroyed at a pH below 5.0. It is then recommended to run a test series combining various pH-values (e.g. pH 4.5, pH 4.0, pH 3 5) with various temperatures-values (e.g. 40°C, 50°C, 60°C, 70°C) and various holding times (e.g 1 minute, 5 minutes, 60 minutes, 240 minutes) By doing this optimum conditions can be found where most of the desirable enzyme is stored and most of the undesirable enzyme (s) are inactivated. It is preferred to hold the pH as acidic or as alkaline as possible, so according to the present invention, a method, wherein said enzyme mixture s adjusted to a pH below 4.5, in particular to a pH below 4.0, especially to a pH below 3.5, or wherein said enzyme mixture is adjusted to a pH above 9.5, m particular to a pH above 10.0, is preferred. According to the invention the temperature should be held m the range of from 2-75°C, in particular m the range of from 10-70°C, preferably m the range of from 25-65°C, even more preferably m the range of from 40-60°C. According to the invention the pH may be adjusted first whereafter the solution is heated/cooled to the desired temperature (as illustrated m Example 1) , or the solution may be heated/cooled to the desired temperature first, whereafter the pH is adjusted (as illustrated in Example 3) . The holding time may be anything from 20 sec. to a couple of weeks, typically the holding time will be in the range of from 1 mmute to 24 hours, preferably in the range of from 1 minute to 4 hours Depending on the desirable and the undesirable enzyme (s) m question it is difficult to say how much of the undesirable enzyme (s) should be inactivated and how much of the desirable enzyme should be maintained. Normally a reduction of the undesirable enzyme (s) to a level of less than 15% of the initial level after the inactivation according to the invention is preferred, in particular to a level of less than 10% of the initial level after the inactivation according to the invention is preferred, even more preferably to a level of less than 2% of the initial level after the inactivation according to the inven¬ tion is preferred, especially to a level of less than 1% of the initial level after the inactivation according to the invention is preferred. Normally it can only be accepted that at maximum half of the desirable enzyme is inactivated, so accordingly, it is pre¬ ferred that the level of the desirable enzyme is more than 50% of the initial level after the inactivation according to the invention, in particular more than 60% of the initial level after the inactivation according to the invention, preferably more than 75% of the initial level after the inactivation according to the invention, even more preferably more than 85% of the initial level after the inactivation according to the invention. Adjusting pH For adjustment of pH virtually any acid or base can be used. The acid may be inorganic or organic. Some examples are hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitrous acid, phosphoric acid, acetic acid, citric acid, and formic acid. Preferred acids are formic acid, citric acid, and acetic acid. Preferred bases are sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and ammonium hydroxide, m particular sodium hydroxide. The following examples further illustrate the present invention; they are not intended to be in any way limiting to the scope of the invention as claimed. In the examples the enzyme activities were determined using one of the following assays: Determination of lipase activity Lipase activity m Example 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 was assayed using glycerine tributyrat as a substrate and gum-arabic as an emulsifier. 1 LU (Lipase Unit) is the amount of enzyme which liberates 1 μmole titratable butyric acid per minute at 30°C, pH 7.0. The lipase activity was assayed by pH-stat using Radiometer titrator VIT90, Radiometer, Copenhagen. Determination of protease activity Protease activity in Example 1, 2, 3 and 8 was assayed using ala-ala-pro-phe-p-nitro anilide as a substrate. When hydrolyzed, the p-nitro anilide (pNA) group is liberated, causing a yellow colour that can be measured spectrophotometrically at 405 nm. The reaction conditions were 30°C, pH 9.5 using a 0.05 M borate/KCl buffer, and the substrate concentration was 2.5 mM pNA-peptide. The change over time m absorbance at 405 nm was measured with an automatic system, <Cobas> FARA, and one unit of activity (1 U) was defined as the amount of enzyme capable of hydrolyzing 1 μmole pNA-peptide per minute. Determination of cellulase activity (endo glucanase activity) using viscosimeter and CMC Cellulase activity m Example 7 was assayed using Carboxy Methyl Cellulose, CMC (Hercules 7 LFD) as a substrate. When hydrolyzed the viscosity of the incubation mixture is lowered and measured using a vibration viscosimeter. The incubation is done at pH=9.0 in 0.1 M tris at 40°C for 30 minutes. The viscosity is measured using a vibrating rod-viscosimeter type MIVI 3000 (Sofrase) . Determination of cellulase activity (Endo glucanase activity) using IEF with CMC Cellulase activities m Example 6 were assayed using Iso Electrical focusing with a CMC topagar overlay. A Pharmacia Ampholme PAGplate, pH 3.5 - 9.5 for IEF was used (Code no. 80-1124-80) . The top agar was prepared using 0.5% CMC (Hercules 7 LFD) + 1% agarose (Litex LSA) m tris maleic acid buffer (pH=7) The suspension is heated to the boiling point for 5 minutes whereafter it is cooled to 55°C. After focusing the pH gradient is removed by succeeding flush using tris maleic acid buffer (pH=7) for one hour. Subsequently the top agar is casted on the top of the gel. The identification has been done after 6 hours at 45°C. A solution of 0.1% Congo red in tris maleic acid buffer (pH=7) is poured over the topagar after which it is left for 10 minutes and decolorized with 1 M NaCl in H20 for 2x10 minutes. Endoglucanase activity is seen as clearing zones on a red background. The quantification has been done on a Biolmage gel scanning system. The zones scanned represent the amount of cellulase activities. Determination of protease activity using IEF with casein Protease activity in Example 7 was assayed using Iso Electrical focusing with a Casein topagar overlay. A Pharmacia Ampholine PAGplate, pH 3.5-9.5 for IEF was used (Code no. 80-1124-80) . The top agar was prepared using a mixture of 1% Casein + 1% agarose (Litex LSA) in tris maleic acid buffer (pH=7) . The agarose is heated to the boiling point for 5 minutes after which it is cooled to 55°C. After focusing the pH gradient is removed by succeeding flush using tris maleic acid buffer (pH=7) for one hour. Subsequently the top agar is casted on to the gel after mixing 1 vol of 1% casein and 1 vol of 1% agarose. Protease activity is seen as precipitated zones of hydrolysed casein. The quantification is done on a Biolmage gel scanner. The scanned zones represent the amount of protease activities. EXAMPLE 1 Inactivation of Protease This example describes the inactivation of undesired proteases in a concentrate at low pH leaving a desired lipase. A culture broth containing lipase B, obtained as described in WO 88/02775 by cloning Candida antarctica lipase B into an Aspergillus oryzae host, in which culture broth an undesired protease is inactivated according to the method of invention. Initially, the culture broth was subjected to solid/liquid separation by drum filtration. Subsequently the drumfiltrate was subjected to UF-concentration on membranes with a cut off of 20 kD. The concentrate was adjusted to pH=3.5 using 10% phosphoric acid and then heated to various temperatures within the interval of from 45° to 70°C, (at 45°C (I) , at 50°C (II) , at 55°C (III) and at 70°C (IV) ) . After various minutes withm the interval of 0-60 minutes samples were adjusted to pH=8.0 using 13% sodium hydroxide, cooled and analyzed for lipase and protease activity. The yield of the desired lipase activity is shown in Figure 1, and the inactivation efficiency of undesired protease acivity is shown in Figure 2. It is seen that a treatment at 45°C for 60 minutes at pH=3.5 offers a residual yield of 92 % of lipase activity (Fig. 1) and less than 2 % undesired protease activity (Fig. 2) . A stability test at 20°C of the remaining lipase activity was conducted on the sample subjected to pH=3.5 and 45°C for 60 minutes. The stability of the treated (II) and a non-treated concentrate (I) from the same batch is shown Figure 3. The graph shows that the treated sample is 100% stable whereas the untreated sample is unstable and loses 40% of the initial activity after just 4 days of storage. EXAMPLE 2 Inactivation of Protease This example describes the inactivation of undesired proteases in a drum filtrate at low pH leaving a desired lipase (the culture broth the same as in Example 1) . Due to the high degree of instability of the desired lipase the method of invention was carried out already at the drum filtrate instead of after a concentration as described in Example 1. Initially, the culture broth was subjected to solid/liquid separation by drum filtration. The drum filtrate was adjusted to pH=3.5 using 10% phosphoric acid and then heated to various temperatures within the interval of 45° to 70°C, (at 45°C (I) , at 50 C C (II) , at 55°C (III) , at 60°C (IV) and at 70°C (V)) . After various minutes within the interval of 0-60 minutes samples were adjusted to pH=8.0 using 13% sodium hydroxide, cooled and analyzed for lipase and protease activity. The yield of the desired lipase activity is shown in Figure 4 and the inactivation efficiency of the undesired protease activity is shown in Figure 5 It is seen that a treatment at 45°C for 60 minutes at pH=3.5 offers a residual yield of 86% of lipase activity and less than 2% undesired protease activity. EXAMPLE 3 Stability Tests This example further describes the inactivation of undesired proteases a drum filtrate at low pH leaving a desired lipase. Initially, the culture broth (the culture broth the same as in Example 1) was subjected to solid/liquid separation oy drumflltration. The drumfiltrate was divided into three fractions. All three fractions were heated to 20°C. One fraction was adjusted to pH=2.5 using 20% phosphoric acid, the second fraction was adjusted to pH=10.7 using 13% sodium hydroxide and the third fraction, considered the untreated fraction, was adjusted to pH=5.5. After 60 minutes the low pH and the high pH fractions were adjusted to pH=5.5 (using 13% sodium hydroxide to the fraction low pH fraction and 20% phosphoric acid to the high pH fraction) After pH adjustment the samples were cooled to 5°C and all fractions were stored at said temperature for 14 days In this way all fractions were kept at pH=5.5 and at 5°C durmg storage Samples from all three fractions were taken after 3, 7, 10 and 14 days and analyzed for lipase activity. The stability during storage of the three fractions are shown in Figure 6. It is seen that an acidic treatment at pH=2.5 for 60 minutes (I) is to be preferred over an alcalme treatment at pH=10.7 also for 60 minutes (II) , both at 20°C, since the acidic treatment offers 100 % stability whereas the alcalme treatment is highly unstable. The reference shows that the untreated sample (III) is also highly unstable. The sample treated at pH=2.5 at 20°C for 60 minutes is 100% stable after being treated using the method of the invention. Yield of the desired lipase was 60%. EXAMPLE 4 Inactivation of Amylase This example describes the inactivation of an undesired amylase a drum filtrate at low pH leaving a desired cellulase A culture broth containing cellulase, obtained as described WO 91/17243 by cloning Humicola insolens cellulase into an Aspergillus oryzae host, in which culture broth an undesired amylase is inactivated by use of the method of the invention. The culture broth was subjected to solid/liquid separation by centrifugation. Subsequently the centrate was subjected to ultrafiltration using membranes with a cut off of 20 kD. The concentrate was heated rapidly to 70°C and adjusted to pH=3.5 using 20% phosphoric acid and kept at said temperature and pH for 1 mmute. After said holding time pH was readjusted to pH=7.0 with 13% sodium hydroxide and cooled rapidly to 40°C. In this way the undesired amylase was inactivated leaving the desired cellulase intact as seen in Table 1 below The undesired amylase is inactivated 100% leaving 96% of the desired cellulase activity intact. Desired Undesired Cellulase Amylase Yield Yield Concentrate treated at 96 % 0 % pH=3.5 for 1 mm at 70°C Table 1. Inactivation of an undesired amylase from a lipase/amylase mixture at low pH and high temperature leaving the desired lipase . EXAMPLE 5 Inactivation of Amylase This example describes the inactivation of an undesired amylase in a culture broth at high pH leaving a desired lipase A culture broth containing lipase, obtained as described in EP 305 216 by cloning Humicola lanugmosa lipase mto an Aspergillus oryzae host, which culture broth an undesired amylase is inactivated by use of the method of the invention Temperature was kept at 35°C and pH was then adjusted to pH=10.7 using 13% sodium hydroxide and kept at said pH for 30 minutes whereby the amylase was inactivated. The culture broth was treated downstream using a solid/liquid separation by filtration to remove sludge leaving a clear filtrate. Subsequently pH was adjusted to pH=8 0 using 13% sodium hydroxide and the liquid was cooled to 10°C. By using this procedure the undesired amylase was inactivated selectively leaving the desired lipase as seen in Table 2 below. The undesired amylase is inactivated completely during the high pH treatment leaving the desired lipase. Desired Undesired Lipase Amylase Yield Yield Culture broth 93 % 0 % treated at pH=10.7 for 30 mm at 35°C Table 2. Inactivation of an undesired amylase from a lipase/amylase mixture at high pH and moderate temperature leaving the desired lipase. EXAMPLE 6 Inactivation of Cellulase This example describes the inactivation of undesired cellulases a concentrate at low pH and at moderate tem¬ perature leaving the desired cellulase from Humicola insolens . A culture broth containing Humicola insolens cellulase, obtained as described in US 4,435,307 was subjected to the method of invention. The desired cellulase with a pl=4.5 is responsible for approximately 25% of the total cellulase activity. Initially, the culture broth was subjected to solid/liquid separation by drum filtration. Subsequently the drum filtrate was subjected to UF-concentration on membranes with a cut off of 20 kD. The concentrate was adjusted to 20°C. Subsequently pH was adjusted to pH=2.0 using 20% phosphoric acid and kept at said pH for 60 minutes. After said holding time pH was adjusted to pH=8.0 using 13% sodium hydroxide. As seen from Table 3 more than 95 % of the undesired cellulase activity is inactivated leaving the desired cellulase activity intact. Yield of Yield of desired undesired cellulase cellulases pH=2.0 at appr. 100 % < 5 % 20°C for 60 min. Table 3. Inactivation of undesired cellulases from a mix of one desired and several undesired cellulases at low pH and at moderate temperature leaving the desired cellulase intact . EXAMPLE 7 Inactivation of Protease This example describes the inactivation of undesired proteases in a concentrate at low pH at low and at moderate temperature leaving the desired cellulase complex from Humicola insolens. As seen in Example 6 the complete cellulase complex is labile under acidic conditions. This Example therefore includes an example of the use of stabilizing components for the desired complete cellulase activity complex. A culture broth containing Humicola insolens cellulase, obtained as described in US 4,435,307 was subjected to the method of invention. Initially, the culture broth was subjected to solid/liquid separation by drum filtration. Subsequently the drum filtrate was subjected to UF-concentration on membranes with a cut off of 20 kD. The concentrate was divided mto six equal fractions as shown in Table 4. All fractions but one was added CMC in the amount of 1% to investigate the stabilizing effects on the desired cellulase durmg inactivation of the undesired proteases . In all cases 20% phosphoric acid was used to obtain the low pH values which were kept at said pH values for 60 minutes m all cases. After said holding time pH was all cases adjusted to pH=8.0 using 13% sodium hydroxide. As seen from Table 4 the effect of CMC at pH=3.0 is an increased cellulase yield durmg inactivation treatment. The effect of lowering the pH is a decreased cellulase yield but at the same time an increased efficiency of inactivation of the undesired proteases. The effect of increasing the temperature is a decreased cellulase yield. Desired cellulase Undesired protea¬ Step yield ses Step yield Conecentrate With 1% Without With 1 % Without treated at CMC CMC CMC CMC pH=2.5, 60 mm, 3°C 57 % 0 % pH=3.0, 60 mm, 3°C 77 % 43 % < 2 % < 2 % pH=3.5, 60 mm, 3°C 90 % < 15 % pH=2.5, 60 mm, 25°C 38 % 0 % pH=3.5, 60 mm, 25°C 95 % < 15 % Table 4. Inactivation of undesired proteases from a mix of cellulases/proteases at low pH and at low to moderate temperatures with and without CMC leaving the desired cellulase EXAMPLE 8 Inactivation of Protease This example describes the inactivation of undesired proteases in a concentrate at low pH leaving a desired catalase A culture broth containing Scytalidium termophilum catalase, obtained as described in WO 92/17571, was subjected to the method of invention. The culture broth was subjected to flocculation as described m Table 5 : Added chemical Amount Pr. Kg Culture (gram) broth Water 2000 Na 3 P0 4 20 CaCl,x2H 2 0 30 pH 8.0 Anionic 2 flocculant Table 5 : Flocculation of broth containing catalase. The flocculated broth was subsequently subjected to solid/liquid separation by drumfiltration. The filtrate was divided into 2 fractions A & B. The two fractions were subjected to the treatment described in Table 6 below. pH was adjusted using 20% phosphoric acid. Treatments Fraction A Fraction B Temperature 40°C 40 ϋ C pH 3.0 2.5 Table 6. Treatments of two identical fractions containing both desired catalase and undesired protease. The fractions were treated for 0.5 and 1 hour; after said treatments the fractions were adjusted to pH=6.5 using 13 % NaOH and cooled to 10°C. Table 7 below illustrates both catalase and protease yields for the treated fractions. Catalase activity was measured using a degradation of hydrogen peroxide. The time consumption, for a specified decrease in spectrophotometrically absorbance at a specified H 2 0 2 concentration, is a measure of the catalase activity. Protease activity was measured using ala-ala-pro-phe-p- nitro anilide substrate described previously. Treatment for Fraction A Fraction B 0.5 hour. Yield of 69 % 62 % desired catalase activity Yield of 14 % < 1 % undesired protease activity Treatment for Fraction A Fraction B 1 hour. Yield of 61 % 58 % desired catalase activity Yield of 11 % < 1 % undesired protease activity Table 7. Yields of desired catalase and undesired protease activities . It is seen that treatment of fraction B using a temperature of 40°C for just 30 minutes at pH=2.5 offers a residual yield of 62 % of catalase activity and less than 1 % of undesired protease activity. Treatment of fraction A does not offer the same protease inactivation.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method for inactivation at least one undesirable enzyme m a mixture of enzymes containing a desirable enzyme comprising the steps of a) holding the mixture at a temperature of from 2°C to 75°C at a pH below 5 0 for at least 20 sec; and/or b) holding the mixture at a temperature of from 2°C to 75°C at a pH above 9.0 for at least 20 sec. 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the undesirable enzyme is selected from the group consisting of proteases, peptidases, amylases, cellulases, lipases, lsomerases, oxidoreductases and xylanases . 3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the desirable enzyme is selected from the group consisting of lipases, amylases, cellulases, oxidoreductases, xylanases, lsomerases, proteases and peptidases. 4. A method accordmg to claim 1, wherein the mixture of enzymes is a culture broth, m particular a clarified culture broth. 5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the mixture of enzymes is a clarified and concentrated culture broth. 6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the enzymes are produced by a fungus, particular a filamentous fungus. 7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the enzymes are produced by Aspergillus or Humicola. 8. A method according to claim 1, wherein said mixture of enzymes is adjusted to a pH below 4.5, in particular to a pH below 4.0. 9. A method according to claim 1, wherein said mixture of enzymes is adjusted to a pH above 9.5, in particular to a pH above 10.0. 10. A method according to claim 1, wherein said mixture of enzymes is held at a temperature in the range of from 2-75°C, in particular in the range of from 10-70°C, preferably in the range of from 25-65°C, even more preferably the range of from 40- 60°C. 11. A method accordmg to claim 1, wherein the level of the undesirable enzyme is less than 15% of initial level after said inactivation, particular less than 2% of initial level after said inactivation. 12. A method according to claim 1, wherein the level of the desirable enzyme is more than 50% of initial level after said inactivation, in particular more than 75% of initial level after said inactivation. 13. A method according to claims 11 and 12, wherein the level of the undesirable enzyme is less than 15% of initial level after said inactivation, in particular less than 2% of initial level after said inactivation, and the level of the desirable enzyme is more than 50% of initial level after said inactivation, in particular more than 75% of initial level after said inactivation. 14. A method according to claim 1, wherein two or more enzymes are desirable. 15. A method according to claim 1, wherein prior to the method at least one stabilizer is added. 16. A method according to claim 1, wherein prior to the method at least one destabilizer is added. 17. A method according to claim 1, wherein prior to the method at least one stabilizer, which stabilize the desirable enzyme, and at least one destabilizer, which destabilize the undesirable enzyme, is added. 18. An enzyme product obtainable by the method according to claim 1.

Inventors: LAUSTSEN MADS AAGE, NIELSSON STIG, LAUSTSEN, MADS, AAGE, NIELSSON, STIG
Applicants: LAUSTSEN MADS AAGE, NIELSSON STIG, NOVONORDISK AS, LAUSTSEN, MADS, AAGE, NIELSSON, STIG, NOVO NORDISK A/S
Application year: 1996
Main classification: C12N9
IPC codes: C12N9