Initiator for making amorphous tetrafluoroethylene-hexafluoropropylene copolymers

Abstract: The invention refers to a novel compound of the formula (C 4 F 9 ) 2 NSCF 3 which is useful as an initiator in a process for preparing amorphous tetrafluoroethylene-hexafluoropropylene copolymers.

Description: This invention concerns (C 4 F 9 ) 2 NSCF 3 for the production of copolymers containing hexafluoropropylene and tetrafluoroethylene which are amorphous. Such copolymers may be produced by a high pressure continuous process. Amorphous fluorinated polymers, particularly perfluorinated polymers, are highly useful, particularly as coatings and encapsulants, because of their unusual surface properties, low refractive index, low dielectric constant, and the relative ease of coating or encapsulating objects with such polymers. However, the use of such polymers has been limited because of their high cost, which usually derives from the high cost of the monomers and/or the high cost of the polymerization process to make the polymers. Therefore, such polymers, and the processes for making them, which are lower in cost are constantly being sought. U.S. Patent 3,062,793 describes amorphous copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and hexafluoropropylene (HFP) which are made by a high pressure free radical polymerization. The only process described therein is a batch process which has a relatively low productivity. This invention concerns a continuous polymerization process such as in WO-A-96/24624, comprising contacting at a pressure of 41 MPa to 690 MPa, and a temperature above 200°C, preferably 200°C to 400°C, tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropylene, and a radical initiator, e.g. of the formula (C 4 F 9 ) 2 NSCF 3 . This invention also concerns the compound of the formula (C 4 F 9 ) 2 NSCF 3 . The TFE/HFP copolymer made herein is amorphous. By an amorphous polymer is meant that the polymer has a heat of melting of less than 1 J/g when measured by Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) at a heating rate of 10°C/min, in the case of a TFE/HFP dipolymer. This is measured on a "first heat", that is virgin polymer is heated to at least 300°C in the DSC (at 10°C/min), and the heat of melting, if any, is measured. In the case of terpolymers, where the residual third monomer is often removed from the polymer by heating for four hours, at 150°C, in a vacuum oven, DSC "second heats", at 10°C/min to at least 200°C, were used. These polymers are made via a continuous polymerization process in which the initial ingredients are fed to the reactor in an essentially continuous manner and in which the product stream is essentially continuously withdrawn at approximately the same rate at which the ingredients are added. Such types of reactions are generally known to the artisan, see for instance H. F. Mark, et al., Ed., Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd Ed., vol. 19, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982, p. 880-914. Such continuous reactors include continuous stirred tank reactors and pipeline (tubular) reactors. Under the conditions employed in the process as described herein, the productivity of the process is exceptionally high. By productivity herein is meant the weight of polymer produced in a unit volume of reactor in a unit volume of time. Productivities herein are reported as kg/L/hr. The process described herein has typical productivities of 0.8 to 15 kg/L/hr. The Examples illustrate that typically higher polymerization temperatures give higher productivities. By contrast, a batch polymerization, making a somewhat similar polymer, reported in U.S. Patent 3,062,793, has productivities (from the Examples) of 0.01 to 0.03 kg/L/hr, more than an order of magnitude less than that for the continuous process. This means a lower cost for polymer produced by the continuous process. The process is run at a pressure of 41 to 690 MPa ( ~ 6,000 to ~ 100,000 psi), preferably 55 to 172 MPa ( ~ 8,000 to ~ 25,000 psi), more preferably 62 to 152 MPa ( ~ 9,000 to 22,000 psi), and especially preferably 69 to 103 MPa ( ~ 10,000 to ~ 15,000 psi). As pressure drops down towards 41 MPa the molecular weight of the polymers formed and the conversion of monomers to polymer both tend to drop. It is preferred that solvents not be used in the process, since at these pressures the monomers, particularly HFP, usually dissolve the polymer. Nonetheless, solvents can be used in the reactor. If the final product is to be a polymer solution, making the polymer solution directly may be preferable, to reduce costs. Sometimes for convenience in handling, small quantities of initiator are best introduced when diluted to a larger volume with a small amount of solvent. Solvent may also be used for other reasons, such as to decrease the viscosity of the process mixture, or to help keep lines clear of polymer, particularly at lower pressures. When solvents are used it is preferred that they be essentially inert under process conditions. Useful solvents include perfluorodimethylcyclobutane and perfluoro(n-butyltetrahydrofuran). The polymer is soluble in the monomer(s) under the process conditions. Therefore, one method of polymer isolation is to reduce the pressure below that required for solution of the polymer, and isolate the polymer from that, as by decantation, filtration or centrifugation. Indeed, it may not be necessary to reduce the pressure of the unreacted monomers to atmospheric pressure, but merely that required for phase separation of the polymer. Therefore these monomers can be recycled with only a "partial" repressurization, thereby saving energy costs. Alternatively the pressure can be reduced to atmospheric pressure, while the volatile monomers are vented off, leaving the product polymer. The monomers can of course be recovered and reused. The apparatus for running the polymerization may be any suitable pressure apparatus in which the reactant and products streams may be added and removed at appropriate rates. Thus the apparatus may be a stirred or unstirred autoclave, a pipeline type reactor, or other suitable apparatus. Agitation is not necessary, but preferable, especially to obtain polymers with low MWD's. The material of construction should be suitable for the process ingredients, and metals such as stainless steel are often suitable. The polymerization is carried out above 200°C, preferably from 200 to 400°C, more preferably from 225 to 400°C, and most preferably from 250 to 400°C. The initiator is chosen so that it will generate active free radicals at the temperature at which the polymerization is carried out. Such free radical sources, particularly those suitable for hydrocarbon vinyl monomers at much lower temperatures, are known to the artisan, see for instance J. Brandrup, et al., Ed., Polymer Handbook, 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989, p. II/1 to II/65. The preferred temperature for running our process depends on both the monomers and the initiator and is often a compromise between raising temperature to favor high productivities and high conversions and lowering temperature to minimize chain transfer and monomer degradation. Suitable free radical initiators are perfluoroalkyl compounds containing nitrogen-sulfur bonds of the formula R 1 2 NSR 1 , wherein each R 1 is independently saturated perfluorohydrocarbyl optionally containing one or more ether groups, isolated iodine, bromine or chlorine substituents, or perfluoroamino groups. By "saturated perfluorohydrocarbyl" is meant a univalent radical containing only carbon and fluorine and no unsaturated carbon-carbon bonds. By an "isolated" iodine, bromine or chlorine substituent is meant that there are no other iodine, chlorine of bromine atoms on carbon atoms alpha or beta to the carbon atom bonded to the isolated iodine, bromine or chlorine atom. One initiator is (C 4 F 9 ) 2 NSCF 3 . The amount of free radical initiator used will vary depending on process conditions. Generally speaking an effective amount is used, an effective amount being that which causes more polymerization to take place with the initiator than without. It is likely that any polymerization without deliberately added initiator present is due to adventitious impurities which can act as initiators at the high polymerization temperatures. Effort should be made to minimize these impurities, such as oxygen. A useful range of initiator concentration has been found to be 0.003 to 0.5 g of initiator/kg monomer, preferably 0.1 to 0.3 g/kg. Higher or lower amounts are also useful depending upon the initiator, the monomers, goal molecular weights, process equipment, and process conditions used, and can readily be determined by experimentation. The initiator may be added to the reactor as a solution in the monomer(s). While "solvents" may be added to the polymerization so that the polymerization is carried out in solution or slurry, it is preferred if little or no solvent is added. The polymer formed is often soluble in the supercritical HFP under the process conditions. The polymer may be isolated simply by reducing the pressure below 34 MPa ( ~ 5,000 psi), at which point the polymer becomes insoluble. The polymer may also be isolated as fibers or fibrils by flash spinning from solvent and by direct flash spinning of the polymerization mixture. Small amounts of solvents may be used for convenience, as for a carrier for the initiator. FC-75, perfluoro(2-n-butyltetrahydrofuran), and the cyclic dimer of HFP are examples of useful solvents. Another useful solvent is supercritical CO 2 . Polymer containing HFP, vinylidene fluoride (VF2) and optionally TFE may be analyzed by 19 F NMR to determine the microstructure of the polymer. In particular, the microstructure of monomer sequences of isolated repeat units derived from HFP and "surrounded" by monomer units derived from VF2 may be determined. These are: Sequence ID Sequence No . Sequence β-β'(CH 2 ) 1 CH 2 CF 2 CF (CF 3 )CF 2 CH 2 CF 2 β-γ'(CH 2 ) 2 CH 2 CF 2 CF 2 CF (CF 3 )CF 2 CH 2 α-γ-γ'(CH 2 ) 3 CH 2 CF 2 CF 2 CF (CF 3 )CH 2 CF 2 CH 2 CF 2 α-β'(CH 2 ) 4 CF 2 CH 2 CF 2 CF (CF 3 )CH 2 CF 2 α-γ'(CH 2 );δ(CF 3 ) 5 CH 2 CF 2 CF 2 CF (CF 3 )CH 2 CF 2 CF 2 CF(CF 3 ) Herein the above sequences will be referred to by their Sequence No. For determining these sequences, 19 F NMR spectra were acquired on 5% solutions in hexafluorobenzene (HFB). Spectra were taken at 80C on a Bruker AC 250 operating at 235.4 MHz for 19 F. The acquisition conditions included a 90 degree pulse width of 5.0 µsec, 20 second recycle delay, and 64 co-added scans. Spectra were referenced to HFB at -162.46 ppm. Composition was determined from the 19 F NMR spectrum in the following way. Because of the high concentration of HFP, it was assumed that all VF2 next to HFP was represented by the signal at -75 ppm. VF2 which was non-adjacent to HFP was taken from the signal at -82 ppm. The sum of these areas was converted to moles of VF2. The amount of HFP was determined from the sum of the areas at -75 ppm and -70 ppm, converted into moles of HFP. In samples containing TFE, the TFE was determined from the area of the signals between -95 and -125 ppm corrected for CF 2 s from HFP and corrected for the CF 2 s from VF2 represented in the signal of HFP CF3s adjacent to CH 2 s from VF2 adjacent to CH 2 s from VF2. For at least one sample, the composition of VF2 determined in this manner was confirmed by adding an internal standard of trifluoromethyldichlorobenzene to a weighed amount of polymer and determining the amount of CF 2 from the 1 H spectrum. For the sample tested, the results agreed within 3% relative. HFP centered sequences were used as a way to identify differences in polymerization. The 19 F signal at -179 to -179.5 ppm was identified as the CF in an HFP centered VF2/HFP/VF2 sequence in which the CH 2 's are beta to the CF. The signal at -180.4 to -181.2 ppm was identified as a CF in a VF2/HFP/VF2 sequence in which there were one CH2 alpha and one CH 2 beta to the CF in the HFP. The final signal at -181 to -181.8 ppm was identified as VF2/HFP/VF2 in which one CH 2 is alpha and one CH 2 is gamma and one CF 3 is delta to the CF. All of the polymers herein may be crosslinked by methods known in the art. Perfluorinated polymers may be crosslinked by exposure to ionizing radiation. Polymers containing hydrogen or functional groups such as nitrile or sulfonyl halide may be crosslinked by methods known in the art. When crosslinked these polymers are of course crosslinked elastomers if their Tg is below ambient temperature. Since TFE is considerably more reactive in the polymerization than HFP, an excess of HFP is needed to achieve the desired polymer composition. Typically this also means that at the end of the polymerization, much or all of the TFE will have polymerized, but there will be (a considerable amount of) unpolymerized HFP. In a sense this is an advantage, since the HFP can act to help carry the polymer from the reactor, and no additional carrier (such as a solvent) is needed. Typically the TFE will be 1 to 15 mole percent of the total amount of monomer being fed to the process, with the HFP and other monomer(s) (if present) being the remainder. The average residence time is the average amount of time any of the material fed to the reactor actually spends in the reactor, and is a function of the volume of the reactor and the volumetric flow of the process ingredients through the reactor. A preferred residence time is 20 sec to 10 min, more preferably 30 sec to 5 min, especially preferably 40 sec to 2 min. A minimum preferred residence time is 10 sec., more preferably 15 sec. A maximum preferred residence time is 10 min. When the process fluids are being added to the reactor, it is preferred if they are preheated just before they enter the reaction to a temperature somewhat less than that of the actual reactor temperature, 20°C to 100°C less. This allows one to maintain a uniform constant temperature in the reactor itself, and for the newly added materials to start the polymerization reaction immediately upon entry to the reactor. The amorphous polymers described herein are useful in a variety applications, many of which are related to the fact that the polymers are readily soluble in certain halogenated, especially perfluorinated solvents, and so the polymers are readily useable as films, coatings and encapsulants. Useful solvents include "dimer", perfluorobenzene, perfluoro(n-butyltetrahydrofuran), and FC-10 (tradename of "dimer" 3M fluorocarbon fluid). Another type of useful solvent is a perfluorinated (organic) compound containing sulfur, such as perfluoro-1,4-dithiane, perfluorothiepane, perfluorodiethylsulfone, and perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride. Since the polymers are relatively chemically resistant, they may be used to encapsulate articles which must be protected from contamination, corrosion and/or unwanted adhesion to other materials. Films and coatings may be particularly useful because of the inherent properties of the polymer, such as, lack of crystallinity (polymer is clear), low surface energy (and hence poor wetting by water or most organic liquids), low dielectric constant, low index of refraction, low coefficient of friction, and low adhesion to other materials. In the Examples, the 19 F NMR, which is used to determine the HFP distribution in the polymer, was measured on Bruker AC 250 NMR operating at 235 MHz. Polymer samples were loaded in 5 mm NMR tubes and heated to 250 to 360°C in a narrow bore probe. In the melt, the methine CF's of the HFP units appear at -183.5 ppm if present as isolated units, at -179.5 if present as head to tail diads, and at -177 ppm if present as head to tail triads. It is uncertain whether or not the integration for the HFP triads at -177 ppm also includes higher (than triads) oligomeric blocks. The amount of HFP triads was determined from the ratio of the areas of the 19 F NMR signal at -177 ppm to the total areas of the signals at -177, -179.5 and -183.5 ppm. In the Examples, pressure change was used to calculate the weight of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) added to the mixing reservoir (2). For the tetrafluoroethylene calculations in Comparative Example 1, gauge pressure of TFE was incorrectly assumed to be absolute pressure. Based upon this incorrect assumption the quantity 160 g of TFE was shown for Comparative Example 1. The actual TFE added in this Example was 223 grams, as shown and labeled as such in parenthesis in the Example. In the Examples, the following abbreviations are used: GPC - gel permeation chromatography HFP - hexafluoropropylene I.D. - inside diameter IR - infrared (spectrum) Mn - number average molecular weight Mw - weight average molecular weight Mv - viscosity average molecular weight O.D. - outer diameter TFE - tetrafluoroethylene In the Examples, the following materials are used: FC®-75 - Fluorinert® Electronic Liquid, sold by 3M Industrial Chemicals Products Division, thought to be substantially perfluoro(2-butyl-tetrahydrofuran) Kapton® Polyimide Film - a polyimide film available from E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a High Pressure Continuous Unit which can be used for the continuous polymerization described herein. In Figure 1, within the barricade, NF 3 initiator is loaded into loop ( 1 ) and then blown to reservoir ( 2 ) using hexafluoropropylene (HFP). In ( 2 ) tetrafluoroethylene is added to the HFP/NF 3 mixture, and the total mixture in ( 2 ) is then removed from the bottom of ( 2 ), boosted to a higher pressure and recirculated through the Monomer Recycle Loop, and then part of it is sent to the heated (polymerization) reactor ( 5 ) and part of it is recycled through valve ( 4 ) back to ( 2 ) after the pressure is lowered at pressure regulator ( 3 ) to the pressure of the contents of ( 2 ). After exiting reactor ( 5 ), the pressure of the mixture is reduced (often to atmospheric pressure) at back pressure regulator ( 6 ) and the copolymer product is isolated in glass collection bottle ( 7 ). Gaseous matter leaving the collection bottle is passed through meter ( 8 ) which is used to measure the amount of unreacted gaseous monomers. A more detailed description of the use of the apparatus of Figure 1 appears below. COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1 Continuous Polymerization in 10 ml Autoclave with Agitation All the reactants needed for a single run were premixed in a reservoir, pressured to 103 MPa, bled off through a heated pressure vessel at slightly lower pressure, and finally vented to atmospheric pressure in the form of solid polymer foamed with unreacted monomer. The detailed procedure given below for Example 1 is in reference to the reactor schematic, Figure 1. Preparation of Homogeneous Monomer/Initiator Mix A 25 ml loop ( 1 ) off the feed line to a 3.8 L reservoir ( 2 ) was pressured to 710 kPa with nitrogen trifluoride at ambient temperature ( ~ 0.6 g of NF 3 ). The 3.8 L reservoir was then loaded with 160 g of TFE (actual TFE loaded was 222 g) and 4000 g of HFP, a portion of the HFP being used to blow the NF 3 into the reservoir ( 2 ). Liquid monomer phase was pulled off the bottom of the reservoir, pressured to 103MPa, and then recirculated back to the reservoir via back pressure regulator ( 3 ). The run was not started until the contents of the clave had been mixed by 10 minutes of such recirculation. Recirculation through the reservoir was maintained for the duration of the run. No effort was made to control the temperature of the reservoir which varied in the case of this run from 23°C at the start to 33°C at the finish. Monomer Feed to Reactor Flow was maintained through the system by letting monomer pressure down in stages, from 103 MPa in the recirculation loop to 96.5 MPa in the reactor and finally to atmospheric pressure in the product collector. The rate of flow was controlled by a micrometering valve ( 4 ) in the stainless steel line that connected the reservoir recirculation loop at 103 MPa with the reactor at 96.5 MPa. Reactor pressure was maintained at 96.5 MPa by back pressure regulator ( 6 ) placed after reactor ( 5 ). Micrometering valve ( 4 ) was opened until monomer flowed through the reactor at 10 to 12 g per minute, the measurement of flow rates being discussed later. In order to maintain steady flow throughout the run, periodic adjustments were made to micrometering valve ( 4 ). Reactor As already mentioned, a flexible stainless steel tube, 0.40 cm O.D. by 0.16 cm I.D., was run from micrometering valve ( 4 ) to the front end of reactor ( 5 ). In an effort to bring the monomers up to reactor temperature rapidly, the last ~ 61 cm of tubing before the reactor was wrapped with electrical tape and preheated to ~ 200°C. Considering that the internal volume of this preheated segment is small relative to the reactor proper ( ~ 1 ml in the preheated line vs. 10 ml in the reactor) and that reaction rates are slower at 200°C than at 275°C, polymer formation in the preheated line was ignored for the purposes of productivity calculations. Reactor ( 5 ), in this Example a 10 cc stainless steel autoclave (10.2 cm long X 1.1 cm I.D. and containing two loose 0.63 cm stainless steel balls), was rocked vigorously with a paint shaker while heating to 275°C. Product Isolation A piece of flexible stainless steel tubing was run from reactor ( 5 ) to back pressure regulator ( 6 ) at which point pressure was dropped from 96.5 MPa to atmospheric. In spite of the fact that no effort was made to warm either the line or the valve, no plugging was observed in this and the majority of runs. When plugging did occur, it was most often at the low pressure side of the regulator ( 6 ) where foamed polymer was left when the monomer flashed off. To minimize plugging, the low pressure side of the let down valve was drilled out to provide as large an orifice as possible and then connected directly to a several liter glass collection bottle ( 7 ). Gaseous monomer exiting the glass collection bottle was passed through wet test meter ( 8 ), the liters of monomer per minute being converted to monomer flow in grams per minute. An average flow rate of 10.9 g/min was thus observed over the 247 minute duration of this run. Given that the density of HFP at 275°C/96.5 MPa is ~ 1.29 g/ml, the average residence time for the monomers in reactor ( 5 ) was ~ 1.2 minutes. Polymer was recovered from the glass collection bottle (7) as large chunks of foamed white solid weighing 170.2 g. Pulling residual monomer off with a vacuum pump reduced the weight of polymer to 159 g for a productivity of 3.8 kg/L/hr. Fluorine NMR of the polymer melt at 330°C found 43 mole % (53 wt %) HFP copolymerized with 57 mole % (47 wt %) TFE, allowing the calculation of 54% TFE conversion per pass and 3.2% HFP conversion per pass. Rolling 1.5 g of this polymer with 5 ml of FC®-75 at room temperature gave a viscous solution. Transparent films were pressed at 160°C by applying 3600 kg of pressure for 1 minute to 1 g samples held between Kapton® polyimide film cover sheets. Under an applied weight of 15 kg, a 2 g sample extruded through a melt indexer at 0.63 g/minute at 200°C. GPC in FC®-75 solvent showed Mw=235,000 and Mn=94,700 for a Mw/Mn=2.87. EXAMPLE 1 (C 4 F 9 ) 2 NSCF 3 Initiation The 10 cc shaken autoclave was set up as in Comparative Example 1. Instead of using NF 3 as initiator, a solution of 0.5 ml (C 4 F 9 ) 2 NSCF 3 (0.92 g) dissolved in 2.0 ml of HFP cyclic dimer (perfluorodimethylcyclobutane) was introduced to reservoir 2 prior to the start of the run. A mix of this initiator with 80 g of TFE and 2200 g of HFP was run through the 10 ml agitated reactor at ~ 11 g/min at 350°C (estimated residence time 1.1 min) and 96.5 MPa for 105 minutes. Vacuum pump drying at room temperature and then for 4 hours at 150°C gave 97 g of poly (HFP/TFE) for a productivity of 5.5 kg/L/hr. One gram of polymer gave a viscous solution with residual insolubles when mixed with 5 ml of FC®-75 at room temperature. Fluorine NMR in the melt at 320°C found 55 wt % HFP/45 wt % TFE. GPC in FC®-75 at 80°C found Mw = 391,000, Mn = 116,000, Mv = 332,000. Roughly 210 g of polymer were made per gram of (C 4 F 9 ) 2 NSCF 3 initiator. EXAMPLE 2 (C 4 F 9 ) 2 NSCF 3 A 100 ml flask was charged with C 4 F 9 N=CFC 3 F 7 (5.0 g 11.5 mmol), CsF (2.3 g, 15 mmol), and 10 ml of diethyl ether under a N 2 atmosphere. After stirring for 3 hours at room temperature, the mixture was cooled to ~ 5°C by an ice-water bath and CF 3 SCl (excess) added via a dry ice-acetone condenser until a slight yellow color was observed in the mixture. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for one day. Then the mixture was filtered, the filtrate partially distilled to remove ether, and the residue bulb-to-bulb distilled at reduced pressure to afford 4.8 g (75%) of colorless liquid, a small amount of which when heated in a melting point capillary showed the initiation of boiling at ~ 145°C. 19 F NMR was consistent with the desired product (C 4 F 9 ) 2 NSCF 3 : -50.1 (m, 3F), -81.4 (t, J = 10 Hz, 6F), -86.0 (AB q, J = 233 Hz, 4F), -121.0 (AB q, J = 290 Hz, 4F), -126.9 (t, J = 15 Hz, 4F).

Claims: A compound of the formula (C 4 F 9 ) 2 NSCF 3 .

Inventors: ANOLICK COLIN, FARNHAM WILLIAM BROWN, FEIRING ANDREW EDWARD, PETROV VIACHESLAV ALEXANDROVIC, QUI WEIMING, SMART BRUCE EDMUND, STEWART CHARLES WINFIELD, WHELAND ROBERT CLAYTON, ANOLICK, COLIN, FARNHAM, WILLIAM BROWN, FEIRING, ANDREW EDWARD, PETROV, VIACHESLAV ALEXANDROVICH, QUI, WEIMING, SMART, BRUCE EDMUND, STEWART, CHARLES WINFIELD, WHELAND, ROBERT CLAYTON
Applicants: DU PONT, E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Application year: 1996
Main classification: C08F214
IPC codes: C08F214, C09D127, C07C317, C09D123, C07C313, C08L27