64 QAM SIGNAL CONSTELLATION WHICH IS ROBUST IN THE PRESENCE OF PHASE NOISE AND HAS LOW DECODING COMPLEXITY

Abstract: A 64 QAM signal constellation reduces phase noise as compared with a rectangular constellation, but requires a fairly simple decoder. The constellation has decision regions which are approximately rectangular; allows for quadrant decoding; and has constellation points representable by a small number of bits.

Description: 64 QAM signal constellation which is robust in the presence of phase noise and has low decoding complexity The invention relates to transmission systems using QAM (quadrature amplitude modulated) signals, to receivers for receiving such signals, and such QAM signals. For digital data transmission over CATV channels to be cost-effective, a consumer grade receiver must be built. At the front-end of such a receiver, a tuner frequency translates the RF band of interest down to baseband. A commercial grade tuner inserts a significant amount of phase noise. This phase noise can cause a rectangular 64 QAM signal to possess an irreducible error rate. In other words, the system will not operate reliably even with an infinite signal to noise ratio (SNR). Previous efforts have been made to reduce phase noise in 64 QAM receivers. These include G.J. Foschini, R.D. Gitlin, and S.B. Weinstein, "On the selection of a two- dimensional signal constellation in the presence of phase jitter and Gaussian noise," BSTJ, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 927-967, July-Aug. 1973. B. W. Kernighan and S. Lin, "Heuristic solution of a signal design optimization problem, "BSTJ, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1145-1159, Sept. 1973 K. Pahlavan, "Nonlinear Quantization and the design of coded and uncoded signal constellations," IEEE Trans Comm., vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1207-1215, Aug. 1991 US Patent No. 4,660,213 These efforts have provided some QAM constellation design which provide improved performance in phase noise. However, the resulting decoders are unacceptably complex, because of arbitrary decision regions necessary to implement the arbitrarily spaced constellation points. Decoder complexity becomes an important issue in high speed data com- munication, since decision directed implementations require extremely fast decoding, necessi¬ tating the use of an extremely complex ROM for general maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding. Further background material may be found in: E. A. Lee and J. G. Messerschmitt, Digital Communication. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1988, in which chapter 6 deals with decoders for 64 QAM signals, and J. Spilker, Digital Communication bv Satellite. Prentice Hall, NJ, 1977, in which Chapter 12 deals with phase noise in 4 QAM signals Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to create a QAM transmissio system using a QAM signal constellation which has low phase noise and also low decoding complexity. It is also an object of the invention to create a decoder for decoding such a 64 QAM signal. This object is achieved using a signal having a constellation including points in the first quadrant of the Cartesian plane having coordinates being substantially proportional to: (1.500,7.500),(1.125,5.250),(3.375,5.625),(5.625,5.625),(0.750,3.750),(2.250,3.750), (3.750,3.750),(5.625,3.375),(0.750,2.250), (2.250,2.250),(3.750,2.250), (0.750,0.750), (2.250,0.750), (3.750,0.750), (5.250,1.125), (7.500,1.500). Advantageously, this constellation may be scaled by a factor of 2% to reduce the number of bits used in decoding. The object may also be achieved with a constellation using points in the first quadrant of the Cartesian plane having coordinates being substantially proportional to: (4,20), (4,14), (8,16), (16,16), (2,10), (6,10), (10, 10), (2, 6), (6,6,), (10,6), (16,8), (2,2), (6,2), (10,2), (14,4), (20,4); although this constellation has been shown to give a signal mor susceptible to additive noise than the first constellation. Boundaries for decision regions for these points can be found according t the conventional technique of bisecting lines between adjacent points of the constellations. However, approximated decision regions, with shapes which are more nearly rectangular are cheaper to implement. The approximated decision regions create a slightly higher error rate in recognizing decision points, but reduce complexity of the resulting decoder. The invention will now be described by way of non-limiting example with reference to the following drawings. Fig. 1 shows a prior art QAM receiver. Fig. 2 shows phase noise characteristics of a prior art voltage-controlled oscillator/tuner. Fig. 3a shows a signal constellation in accordance with the invention (Cons. A) with a first type of decision regions. Fig. 3b shows Cons. B with a second type of decision regions Fig. 4 shows a scaled version of Fig. 3. Fig. 5a shows a second signal constellation in accordance with the invention (Cons. B) with the first type of decision regions. Fig. 5b shows Cons. B with the second type of decision regions. Fig. 6 comparative performance of signal decoding schemes. Fig. 7 comparative performance of signal decoding schemes. Fig. 8 shows a decoder for decoding Cons. A. Fig. 9 shows an alternate embodiment for a decoder for decoding Cons. A. Fig. 10 shows a decoder for decoding Cons. B. A baseband QAM transmitted signal can be written as 0) ■s( *=«∑ A t-nT), ntl where T s is the symbol time interval, α is a scaling factor, I is the space of integers and ~ is the QAM input symbol stream which can take on complex values corresponding to a A. given QAM constellation. Also g(t) is an arbitrary shaping function which is typically chosen to have a square-root raised-cosine (SQRC) spectrum to maximize the SNR. and minimize the inter-symbol interference (ISI). The transmitted signal is then given by where w c is the carrier frequency in radians. At the receiver, the transmitted signal is first subjected to IF filtering. Then the signal spectrum is frequency shifted to close to DC, so that the entire two-sided QAM spectrum is in the passband. This frequency-shifting is accomplished using a tuner, The tuner introduces phase noise into the system. The output of the tuner, when subjected to programmable gain control used to restrict peak values, will be called r(t) herein, and is shown as the input to Fig.1, which is a prior art QAM receiver, as shown in chapter 6 of the Lee et al book cited above. The signal r(t) is presented to the analog to digital converter 101, and then fed to a timing recovery circuit 102 which controls the clock phase of the analog to digital converter 101 with a feedback loop as shown. An analytic filter 103, with a SQRC filter characteristic, operates on the output of the analog to digital converter 101. After a frequency shift to the baseband at 104, me signal, now called - , is sent to an adaptive equalizer 105. Due to oscillator imperfections, there is a residual frequency offset between the transmitter and the receiver and also an associated phase jitter in the output- of the adaptive equalizer 105 which must be corrected by the carrier recovery circuit 106 which follows the adaptive equalizer. This correction is implemented by using the complex multiplier 109 after the adaptive equalizer as shown. This multiplier is followed by the QAM decoder 107 which finally performs a mapping from the complex noisy input to the complex symbol output ~ . A decision- feedback equalizer (DFE) 108 may also be used. The tap-adaptation of the adaptive equalizer uses the error between the decoded output and the noisy signal, along with the correction required due to the carrier recovery circuit, shown in the form of the complex multiplier 110. The DFE uses only the error signal out of the element 111. For decision-directed implementations, an error signal ~ ,. A is used v e k exp(jAwt) as an input to fine-tune the equalizer tap coefficients. Also the QAM decoder acts as a the slicer. The output ~ is used in the carrier recovery loop as well as in the DFE. The QAM decoding must be performed as quickly as possible to avoid delays in the decision-directed loops. Assuming that the adaptive equalizers remove the inter-symbol interference (ISI) completely, it can then be seen that where ~ is the complex additive noise and φ k is the residual phase noise that is left n k uncorrected by the carrier-recovery circuit. Fig. 2 shows the phase noise characteristics of a voltage-controlled oscillator VCO in a tuner designed by ANADIGICS. The phase noise level at a 100 kHz offset is about -100 dBc/Hz. At this bandwidth, phase noise level has essentially flattened out. As discussed in the Spilker book, chapter 12, mentioned above, this section of the phase noise will appear essentially unaltered by the phase-locked loop (PLL) in the carrier recovery circuit 106, even when the bandwidth is made considerably larger than 100 kHz. Typically, the PLL is used to track low-frequency jitter, while the high-frequency jitter is left uncorrected for optimal results. The output of the PLL has phase noise components because of the additive noise, ~ , and also due to the low-frequency jitter. The phase noise components due to additive noise can be ignored by assuming that the SNR is large. Also, the low-frequency jitter is inversely proportional to the PLL bandwidth. Hence, with a proper selection of the PLL parameters, it is possible to reduce this jitter significantly. As a first-order approximation, then, the phase noise, φ k , can be assumed to be the uncorrected flat-portion of the tuner noise as shown in Fig. 2. In other words, for a symbol rate of 5 MHz, the flat portion is from about 100 kHz to about 3 MHz. This phase noise can then be conveniently modeled to have a Gaussian distribution with zero mean and the variance which is given by the area under the curve in Fig 2 between 100 kHz and 3 MHz. This area is approximated by the level at 100 kHz times the frequency band. A Gaussian phase noise distribution can then be used to evaluate the performance of various QAM constellations in the presence of phase noise. It is possible to design QAM constellations which are more robust to phase noise, as discussed in the background of the invention. However, a good QAM constellation must take decoding complexity into account. For small decoding complexity, the following constraints must be satisfied: 1. The decision regions should preferably be rectangular, such that the boundaries of these regions are representable by as small a number of bits as possible. Since arbitrary scaling can be assumed, this implies that all the decision boundaries should be representable by integer multiples of a fixed quantity, such that the largest such integer is a small number. 2. Quadrant decoding should be allowed. One way to ensure this is to make the constellation in a quadrant symmetric about the y=x line, or about an angle of 45 degrees. In general only the nearest points to the X and the Y axes need be symmetric, so that the decision regions include the X and the Y axes. 3. The constellation points must be representable by a small number of bits, using the same scaling assumed above. This is because the ROM size is directly proportional to this number. In the above-mentioned article by Pahlavan a 64 QAM constellation is proposed which allows for quadrant decoding. The resulting decision boundaries, when deter mined by the conventional technique of bisecting lines connecting adjacent points of the constellation, are difficult to implement. An improvement on the Pahlavan constellation according to the invention is shown in Figs. 3a and 3b. The constellation points here are (1.500,7.500), (1.125,5.250), (3.375,5.625), (5.625,5.625), (0.750,3.750), (2.250,3.750), (3.750,3.750), (5.625,3.375), (0.750,2.250), (2.250,2.250),(3.750,2.250), (0.750,0.750), (2.250,0.750), (3.750,0.750), (5.250, 1.125), (7.500,1.500). The boundaries of the decision regions can be determined by bisecting lines between adjacent points as shown in Fig. 3a. For most of the points, this yields rectangular decision regions, which are easy to implement in a decoder. For some of the points, the resulting non-rectangular decision regions are more expensive to implement and are shown as jagged lines. These jagged lines can be approximated in many cases by rectangular decision regions, shown in Fig. 3b. These approximated regions give slightly noisier performance in exchange for much decreased decoder complexity. The approximated decisio regions are as indicated in the following table: TABLE I Point Intersection of the following regions being the decision region for the corresponding point (1.500,7.500) x≥O; y≥ 6.375; y≥x+4.125 (1.125,5.250) y≤6.375; y≥4.5; x≥O; x≤2.250 (3.375,5.625) x≥2.25; x<4.5; y≥4.5; y≤x+4.125 (5.625,5,625) y≥4.5; x≥4.5 (0.750,3.750) x≥O; x≤1.5; y≥3; y≤4.5 (2.250,3.750) x≥1.5; x≤3; y≥3; y≤4.5 (3.750,3.750) x≥3; x≤4.5; y≥3; y<4.5 (5.625,3.375) y≥2.25; y<4.5; x≥4.5; y≥x - 4.125 (0.750,2.250) x≥O; x<1.5; y≥1.5; y≤3 (2.250,2.250) x≥1.5, x≤3; y≥1.5; y≤3 (3.750,2.250) x≥3; x<4.5; y≥1.5; y≤3 (0.750,0.750) x≥O; x<1.5; y≥O; y≤1.5 (2.250, 0.750) x≥1.5; x<3; y≥O; y≤1.5 (3.750,0.750) x≥3; x<4.5; y≥O; y<1.5 (5.250,1.125) x≥4.5; x<6.375; y≥O; y<2.25 (7.500,1.500) x≥6.375; y≥O; y≤x - 4.125 Alternatively a scaled constellation, as shown in Fig.4, may be used. Both types of decision region are shown in the figure, superimposed on one another. This constellation requires that incoming signal points be scaled by a factor of 2% prior to being presented to the decoder. The scaled points are: (4,20), (3,14), (9,15), (15, 15), (2,10), (6,10) (10,10), (15,9), (2,6), (6,6), (10,6), (2,2), (6,2), (10,2), (14,3), (20,4). The scaled 8 decision regions, with approximated rectangular boundaries, are indicated in the following table: TABLE π Point Intersection of the following regions being the decision region for the corresponding point (4,20) y≥17; x≥O; y ≥ x + 11 (3,14) x≥O; x≤6; y≥12; y<17 (9,15) x≥6; x<12; y≥12; y≤x+11 (15,15) x≥12; y≥12; (2,10) x≥O; x<4; y≥8; y≤12 (6,10) x≥4; x<8; y≥8; y≤12 (10,10) x≥8; x≤12; y≥8; y 12 (15,9) x≥12; y≥6; y<12; y ≥ x - 11 (2,6) x≥O; x<4; y≥4; y<8 (6,6) x≥4; x≤8; y≥4; y≤8 (10,6) x≥8; x<12; y>4; y≤8 (2,2) x≥O; x<4; y≥O; y<4 (6,2) x≥4; x<8; y≥O; y<4 (10,2) x≥8; x<12; y≥O; y<4 (14,3) x≥12; x<17; y≥O; y<6 (20,4) x≥17; y≥O; y≤x - 11 Figs 5a and 5b show a second constellation (Cons. B) in accordance with the invention. This constellation does not perform quite as well as the constellations of Figs 3a, 3b and 4. The constellation points of this constellation are: (4,20), (4,14), (8,16), (16,16), (2,10), (6,10), (10,10), (2, 6), (6,6,), (10,6), (16,8), (2,2), (6,2), (10,2), (14,4), (20,4). Again, decision regions can be determined by bisecting lines between adjacent points as shown in Fig.5a. For many of the points, however, this yields non- rectangular decision regions, as indicated by the jagged lines in the figure. More nearly rectangular approximated decision regions can be chosen, as shown in Fig.5b. These approximated decision regions give slightly suboptimal performance but are much cheaper to implement in the decoder. The more nearly rectangular approximated decision regions are as indicated in the following table: TABLE ffl Points Intersection of the following regions being the decision region for the corresponding point (4,20) x≥O; x<12; y≥17; y≥x+12 (4,14) x≥O; y≥12; y≤17; y< -2x + 27 (8,16) y≥ -2x + 27; y≤x+12; y≥12; x≤12 (16,16) x≥12;y≥12 (2,10) x≥O; x<4; y≥8; y≤12 (6,10) x≥4; x<8; y≥8; y≤12 (10,10) x≥8; x<12; y≥8; y<12 (16,8) y<12; x≥12; x + 2y ≥ 27; y≥x-12 (2,6) x≥O; x<4; y 4; y≤8 (6,6) x>4; x<8; y≥4; y≤8 (10,6) x≥8; x<12; y≥4; y<8 (2,2) x≥O; x<4; y≥O; y≤4 (6,2) x≥4; x<8; y≥O; y≤4 10 (10,2) x ≥ 8; x < 12; y≥O; y <4 (14,4) x≥ 12; x< 17; y≥O; x + 2y ≤ 27 (20,4) x≥ 17; y< 12; y≤ x - 12; y≥O Fig. 6 shows the bit-error rate (BER) performance of the constellation in Fig. 3 (Cons. A) in the presence of Gaussian phase-noise as a function of SNR. The lines in this figure have the following significance: Solid Line: Theoretical performance of 64 QAM in Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) SSmmaallll DDaasshheess:: Differentially-Encoded (DE) Rectangular (Rect.) 64 QAM in AWGN Dotted Line: DE Rect. 64 QAM with 1 degree rms phase noise Asterisk only: DE Rect. 64 QAM with 2 degrees rms phase noise Dash-Dot Line: DE modified (where "modified" means the use of approximated decision region boundaries, as shown in the non-jagged lines of Figs 3-5) 64 QAM Cons. A in AWGN Dash-3Dots Line: DE modified 64 QAM Cons. A with 1 degree rms phase noise Large Dashes: DE modified 64 QAM Cons. A with 2 degrees rms phase noise Triangles Constellation of US Patent No. 4,660,213 using optimal decoding with 2 degrees rms noise Constellation of US Pat. No. 4,660,213 with 1 degree rms noise ' + ' Constellation of US Pat. No. 4,660,213 with no phase noise Surprisingly, the suboptimal decoding of Cons. A performs better than optimal maximum likelihood ( ML) decoding using the constellation of US Patent No. 4,660,213 with two degrees rms Gaussian phase-noise. The rectangular QAM constellation cannot operate reliably with two degrees rms phase noise. Making the constellation robust to two degrees rms phase noise, when compared with one degree rms, yields an increased phase noise susceptibility in terms of the phase noise level of 6 dB. Fig. 7 compares the performance of Cons. A and Cons. B in Gaussian phase noise. The symbols on the table can be interpreted as follows, the first three sets of symbols being the same as the corresponding symbols defined in Fig. 6: Solid line: Theoretical performance of 64 QAM in Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) Dotted line: DE rect. 64 QAM in AWGN Asterisk only: DE rect. 64 QAM with 2 degrees rms phase noise Small dashes: DE modified 64 QAM Cons. A in AWGN Dash-dot line: DE modified 64 QAM Cons. A with 2 degrees rms phase noise Dash-3dots line: DE modified 64 QAM Cons. B in AWGN Large dashes: DE modified 64 QAM Cons. B with 2 degrees rms phase noise The performance of constellation B is slightly worse, on the order of .5 dB for two degrees rms phase noise. Table IV summarizes the performance obtained for the different constellation at the BER of 10 "5 using the simplified decision regions. TABLE IV rms value Cons. A (dB) Cons. B (dB) 0 degree 0.38 0.64 2 degrees 2.75 3.23 Fig. 8 shows a decoder for decoding Cons. A. Real R and imaginary I components are input to the quadrant rotator 801, which outputs absolute value signals | R| and 111, . These address ROM 802. The contents of the ROM 802 correspond to the decision regions shown in Fig. 4 which are either rectangular or modified to be rectangular according to the sub-optimal decoding scheme. A five bit number corresponding to either the real or imaginary part denotes an integer from 0 to 21. Hence the two 5-bit numbers denote a point in the real-imaginary plane. For ROM 802, the two 5 bit numbers for a 10 bit address to a point where the constellation point closes to the received point is stored. As explained earlier, only 4 bits need to be stored for each axis to represent a decision region for a constellation point in ROM 802, because all the constellation points have integer values less than 16, as shown in Fig. 4. If the absolute value signals correspond to rectangular decision regions, decision region indications are ouφut at 803. If the absolute value signals correspond to non- rectangular signal regions a fail signal is ouφut at 804. If there is no fail signal at 804, switch 805 selects the ouφuts of ROM 802. If there is a fail signal at 804, switch 805 selects the ouφuts of ROM 806. Decision regions which are non-rectangular are implemented by this ROM 806. To address ROM 806, the values | R | and 111 are fed to a subtraction means 807 which ouφuts a sign bit (Sign( | R | - 111 )) and the 5-bit value | R | - 111. The 5-bit value is in turn fed to comparator 808 which compares the input to the value 11. The ROM 806 is addressed by the sign bit in combination with the comparator ouφut. This implements the decision region for points (4,20), (15,9), (9,15), and (20,4). ROM 806 ouφuts according to the following table: TABLE V Sign(| R| -| I |) | |R| -| I| | > 11 or ≥ 11 point ouφut + true (20,4) + false (15,9) - true (4,20) - false (9,15) As can be seen, even in this implementation, a large ROM table is required at 802, namely 2 10 x4x2=2 13 . Further reductions could be made by implementing the rectangular region at the extreme bottom rights side and at the top left side, i.e. around points (3,14) and (4,13) as shown in Fig. 4, separately. Fig. 9 shows this implementation. In this figure, the unchanged elements retain the same reference numerals as in Fig. 8. A truncator 901 is added to truncate values | R| and | I | . The resulting 2 bit values are used to address ROM 902 which now has only 2 4 x4x2=2 7 bits. ROM 902 now operates according to the following table: TABLE VI real input with two least imaginary input with two ouφut point significant and one most least significant and one significant bits truncated most significant bit trun¬ cated 00 00 (2,2) 01 00 (6.2) 10 00 (10,2) 00 01 (2,6) 01 01 (6,6) 10 01 (10,6) 00 10 (2, 10) 01 10 (6, 10) 10 10 (10, 10) 11 11 (15,15) ROM 903 is now addressed by the sign bit (Sign( | R | - 111 )) and by the ouφuts of 3 comparators 808, 904, and 905, which compare their inputs with the values 11 , 17, and 5 respectively. 5-bit switches choose between | R| and | I | based on the value of Sign( I R I - 111 ), with the inputs of switch 907 being reversed in comparison with the inputs of switch 906. When Sign( | R| - | I | ) is positive, switch 906 chooses | R| and switch 907 chooses 111. When Sign( | R | - 111 ) is negative, switch 906 chooses 111 and switch 907 chooses | R | . The comparators 808, 906, 907 each give a one bit ouφut which indicates whether the input is greater than or less than the respective numerical values, 11, 17, and 6. These ouφuts, in conjunction with Sign( | R | - 111 ) are used to address the ROM 903, which ouφuts the appropriate constellation points in response to its inputs. In embodiment the points (14,3), (15, 9), (20,4), (3, 14), (9, 15), and (4,20) are decoded by the ROM 903 according to the following table: TABLE Vπ |R| III Sign(|R| - l |R|-|i| | choice by choice by point III ) > 11 906 and 907 and ouφut > 17 > 6 0-6 12-17 true and in |R| (3,14) false false false 0-12 > 17 false III | R| (4,20) true true or false 6-12 > 12 true in | R| (9,15) true or true false > 12 6-12 + false | R| m (15,9) true or true false 12-17 0-6 + true or |R| | i | (14,3) false false false > 17 0-12 + true | R| (20,4) true true or false Fig. 10 shows a decoder for decoding Cons. B. Like elements have been given the same reference numerals as in previous figures. ROM 1001 has been reduced in size to 2 4 x3x2. Rom 1001 uses the same decision table as ROM 902. However, the number of bits is decreased because the last row ouφuts point (16,16) rather than (15,15); and (16,16) can be expressed with three binary zeroes, while (15, 15) requires four binary ones. Ouφut 1002 now has only 6 bits rather than 8 as before. Switch 1003 has only 8 bits of ouφut rather than 10 as before. Switch 1004 now has 5 bits of ouφut to allow multiplication by two of its 15 ouφut. Comparator 1006 compares to 12, rather than 11 and comparator 1007 compares to 27 rather than to 5. Additional logic 1005 has been added, so that the input to comparator 1007 is the sum of the ouφuts of switches 906 and 1004. ROM 1008 decides according to the following table: TABLE Vm Sign(| R| - MR|-|i| l > choice by 906 choice by 1004 point ouφut | I | ) 12 and > 17 and > 27 ~ true and false III | R| (4, 14) false false — false Ml | R| (4,20) true true or false ~ true III | R| (8, 16) true or false true + false | R| III (16,8) true or false true + true or false | R| m (14,4) false false + true | R| m (20,4) true true or false ROM 1008 now has 16x4x2 bits. Thus Cons. B has considerably reduced decoding complexity when compared to Cons. A.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. Digital transmission system comprising a transmitter with a digital modulator for modulating a carrier according to a QAM constellation, said transmitter being arranged for transmitting said modulated carrier via a transmission medium to a receiver, characterised in that the QAM constellation includes points in the first quadrant of the Cartesian plane having coordinates being substantially proportional to (1.500,7.500), (1.125,5.250), (3.375,5.625), (5.625,5.625), (0.750,3.750), (2.250,3.750), (3.750,3.750), (5.625,3.375), (0.750,2.250), (2.250,2.250),(3.750,2.250), (0.750,0.750), (2.250,0.750), (3.750,0.750), (5.250, 1.125), (7.500,1.500). 2. Transmission system according to claim 1, characterised in that the constellation comprises points with substantially the following coordinates: (4,20), (3,14), (9,15), (15, 15), (2,10), (6,10) (10,10), (15,9), (2,6), (6,6), (10,6), (2,2), (6,2), (10,2), (14,3), (20,4). 3. Transmitter with a modulator for modulating a carrier according to a QAM constellation, characterised in that the QAM constellation includes points in the first quadrant of the Cartesian plane having coordinates being substantially proportional to: (1.500,7.500), (1.125,5.250), (3.375,5.625), (5.625,5.625), (0.750,3.750), (2.250,3.750), (3.750,3.750), (5.625,3.375), (0.750,2.250), (2.250,2.250),(3.750,2.250), (0.750,0.750), (2.250,0.750), (3.750,0.750), (5.250, 1.125), (7.500, 1.500). 4. Transmitter according to claim 3, characterised in that the constellation comprises points with substantially the following coordinates: (4,20), (3, 14), (9,15), (15, 15), (2, 10), (6,10) (10,10), (15,9), (2,6), (6,6), (10,6), (2,2), (6,2), (10,2), (14,3), (20,4). 5. Digital transmission system comprising a transmitter with a digital modulator for modulating a carrier according to a QAM constellation, said transmitter being arranged for transmitting said modulated carrier via a transmission medium to a receiver, characterised in that the QAM constellation includes points in the first quadrant of the Cartesian plane having coordinates being substantially proportional to: (4,20), (4, 14), (8, 16), (16, 16), (2, 10), (6, 10), (10, 10), (2, 6), (6,6,), (10,6), (16,8), (2,2), (6,2), (10,2), (14,4), (20,4). 6. Digital modulator for modulating a carrier according to a QAM constella- tion, characterised in that the QAM constellation includes points in the first quadrant of the Cartesian plane having coordinates being substantially proportional to: (4,20), (4, 14), (8, 16), (16,16), (2, 10), (6, 10), (10,10), (2, 6), (6,6,), (10,6), (16,8), (2,2), (6,2), (10,2), (14,4), (20,4). 7. QAM signal defined by a signal constellation, characterised in that the constellation comprises points in the first quadrant of the Cartesian plane having coordinates being substantially proportional to: (1.500,7.500), (1.125,5.250), (3.375,5.625), (5.625,5.625), (0.750,3.750), (2.250,3.750), (3.750,3.750), (5.625,3.375), (0.750,2.250), (2.250,2.250),(3.750,2.250), (0.750,0.750), (2.250,0.750), (3.750,0.750), (5.250,1.125), (7.500, 1.500). 8. A signal according to claim 7, characterised in that the constellation points have substantially the coordinates : (4,20), (3, 14), (9,15), (15, 15), (2, 10), (6, 10) (10,10), (15,9), (2,6), (6,6), (10,6), (2,2), (6,2), (10,2), (14,3), (20,4). 9. QAM signal defined by a signal constellation, characterised in that the signal constellation comprises points in the first quadrant of the Cartesian plane having coordinates being substantially proportional to: (4,20), (4, 14), (8, 16), (16,16), (2, 10), (6, 10), (10,10), (2, 6), (6,6,), (10,6), (16,8), (2,2), (6,2), (10,2), (14,4), (20,4). 10. A decoder for decoding a QAM signal, the decoder comprising input means for receiving the signal, decoding means for decoding according to a constellation and ouφut means for supplying a decoded signal characterised in that the constellation comprises points in the first quadrant of the Cartesian plane having coordinates being substantially proportional to: (1.500,7.500), (1.125,5.250), (3.375,5.625), (5.625,5.625), (0.750,3.750), (2.250,3.750), (3.750,3.750), (5.625,3.375), (0.750,2.250), (2.250,2.250), (3.750,2.250), (0.750,0.750), (2.250,0.750), (3.750,0.750), (5.250, 1.125), (7.500,1.500), . 11. A decoder according to claim 10, characterised in that the decoding means implements decision regions which have boundaries bisecting adjacent points of the constellation. 12. A decoder according to claim 10, characterised in that the decoding means implements decision regions substantially proportional to those given in the following table, points on the boundaries being classifiable in any region whose boundary those points fall on: Point Intersection of the following regions being corresponding decision region (1.500,7.500) x≥O; y≥6.375; y≥x+4.125 (1.125,5.250) y≤6.375; y≥4.5; x≥O; x<2.250 (3.375,5.625) x≥2.25; x<4.5; y≥4.5; y≤x+4.125 (5.625,5,625) y≥4.5; x≥4.5 (0.750,3.750) x≥O; x<1.5; y≥3; y≤4.5 (2.250,3.750) x≥1.5; x<3; y≥3; y≤4.5 (3.750,3.750) x≥3; x<4.5; y≥3; y≤4.5 (5.625,3.375) y≥2.25; y≤4.5; x≥4.5; y≥x - 4.125 (0.750,2.250) x≥O; x<1.5; y≥1.5; y<3 (2.250,2.250) x≥1.5, x<3; y≥1.5; y≤3 (3.750,2.250) x≥3; x<4.5; y≥1.5; y<3 (0.750,0.750) x≥O; x<1.5; y≥O; y≤1.5 (2.250, 0.750) x≥1.5; x 3; y≥O; y<1.5 (3.750,0.750) x≥3; x<4.5; y≥O; y<1.5 (5.250,1.125) x≥4.5; x≤6.375; y≥O; y<2.25 (7.500,1.500) x≥6.375; y≥O; y≤x - 4.125 13. The decoder of claim 10, characterised in that the decoding means implements decision regions substantially as indicated in the following table, with points on boundaries being classifiable in any region whose boundaries those points fall on: Point Intersection of the following regions being corresponding decision region (4,20) y≥17; x≥O; y ≥ x + 11 (3,14) x≥0;x≤6; y≥12; y≤17 (9,15) x≥6; x<12; y≥12; y≤x+11 (15,15) x≥12;y≥12; (2,10) x≥O; x<4; y≥8; y≤12 (6,10) x≥4; x≤8; y≥8; y≤12 (10,10) x≥8; x<12; y≥8; y<12 (15,9) x≥12; y≥6; y<12; y ≥ x- 11 (2,6) x≥O; x<4; y≥4; y≤8 (6,6) x>4; x<8; y≥4; y≤8 (10,6) x≥8; x<12; y≥4; y≤8 (2,2) x≥O; x<4; y≥O; y<4 (6,2) x>4; x<8; y≥O; y<4 (10,2) x≥8; x<12; y≥O; y<4 (14,3) x≥12; x<17; y≥O; y≤6 (20,4) x>17; y≥O; y≤x - 11 14. A decoder for decoding a QAM signal comprising input means for receiving the signal; decoding means for decoding the signal according to a constellation and ouφut means for supplying a decoded signal, characterised in that the constellation comprises points in the first quadrant of the Cartesian plane having coordinates being substantially proportional to: (4,20), (4,14), (8,16), (16,16), (2,10), (6,10), (10,10), (2, 6), (6,6,), (10,6), (16,8), (2,2), (6,2), (10,2), (14,4), (20,4). 20 15. The decoder according to claim 14, characterised in that the decoding means implements decision regions as indicated in the following table, or a scaled version thereof, with points lying on the boundaries being classifiable in any region on whose boundaries those points lie: Points Intersection of the following regions giving the corresponding decision region (4,20) x≥O; x<12; y≥17; y≥x+12 (4,14) x≥O; y≥12; y<17; y< -2x + 27 (8,16) y≥ -2x + 27; y≤x+12; y≥12; x<12 (16,16) x≥12; y≥12 (2,10) x≥O; x<4; y≥8; y<12 (6,10) x≥4; x<8; y≥8; y<12 (10,10) x>8; x<12; y≥8; y≤12 (16,8) y≤12; x>12; x + 2y ≥ 27; y≥x-12 (2,6) x≥O; x<4; y≥4; y<8 (6,6) x≥4; x<8; y≥4; y≤8 (10,6) x≥8; x<12; y≥4; y<8 (2,2) x≥O; x<4; y≥O; y<4 (6,2) x≥4; x<8; y≥O; y<4 (10,2) x≥8; x<12; y≥O; y<4 (14,4) x≥12; x 17; y≥O; x + 2y < 27 (20,4) x≥17; y≤12; y≤ x - 12; y≥O To " Receiver for receiving quadrature amplitude modulated signals comprising input means for receiving a modulated signal, decoding means for decoding a signal based on a plurality of decision regions having boundaries, at least one of the decision regions having a boundary aligned with at least one other of said boundaries of said decision regions, whereby the influence of phase noise is reduced, at least one of which boundaries being an approximated boundary which appiximated but does not equal a line which bisects adjacent constellation points, at least one of the decision regions being rendered rectangular by the approximated boundary.

Inventors: HULYALKAR SAMIR N, HULYALKAR, SAMIR, N.
Applicants: PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NV, PHILIPS NORDEN AB, PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
Application year: 1995
Main classification: H04L27
IPC codes: H04L27