IMPROVED SOLAR COLLECTORS

Abstract: An energy concentration device, which comprises a main collector dish (MR), a supplementary means (SR) and a receiver (P). Radiant energy, such as solar energy is reflected from the main collector (MR) to a zone on the supplementary reflector (SR) which is then focused to the reveiver (P). This enables the receiver (P) to be provided at a fixed position, such as on the ground or at a distant location, enabling easy access and reduced costs in maintenance, etc. of a solar energy absorber, the elimination of flexible or rotary joints, etc. The main collector (MR) can be constructed of a plurality of flat or curved reflector panels, also reducing the costs of the collector (MR). A modified form is to eliminate the supplementary reflector (SR) and position the receiver (P) in its place.

Description: IMPROVED SOLAR COLLECTORS Technical Field This invention concerns solar collectors which utilise a large spheroidal or paraboloidal dish to concentrate the sun's radiation to a single zone, where a solar receiver is usually mounted. More particularly, this invention concerns an improved solar energy collector arrangement involving a main collector and an associated small reflector, which is used to direct concentrated solar energy to a receiver location. The present invention can be used with a receiver close to the main collector, or it may be used in a heliostat, in which a number of collectors each direct concentrated solar energy to a single, remote receiver of the energy. Background to the invention Recent work in connection with the utilisation of solar energy has led to the development of solar concentrating collectors with increased capability, capacity and usefulness. For example, a solar collector installation using parabolic trough collectors to provide heat to steam turbogenerators is currently being used to supply 354 megawatts of electrical power to the California (USA) grid. Improved central receiver concentrators have also been developed but, as yet, no commercial installation using such technology is operational. Solar concentrating reflectors having a parabolic or other reflective surface (for example, a spherical reflector), which are often called "dishes" because of the dished shape of the reflector, have potentially the highest efficiency of conversion of solar heat and can attain the highest useful temperatures. Development work with such dishes has been carried out for some 20 years. Many different versions of solar concentrating dish collectors have been built over the years. One of the most recent designs is featured in Figures 1 and 2 of the specification of the present applicant's International patent application No PCT/AU93/00588. whic is WIPO Publication No WO 94/1 1918, the specification of which should be considere to be entirely incorporated herein by this reference thereto. Although it has been difficul to achieve true cost effectiveness, in comparison with heat produced by traditional energ sources, using reflecting dishes, since they can collect more solar energy than other form of solar collector (because they face the sun squarely all day long), their furthe development is continuing in a number of research centres. The dish design featured in the aforementioned WIPO Publication No WO 94/1 1918 i an example of the so-called large dishes (that is collectors with apertures of more tha 200m 2 ) which have been constructed recently. These large dishes are likely to provide th most economical high quality heat for temperatures above 200°C. Because the stagnatio temperature achievable with large solar energy collectors can, by suitable design, b greater than 2,000°C, these collectors have a multiplicity of potential uses which requir process heat in the range of from 200°C to 1,500°C. Typical uses include th cost-effective generation of electricity by the solar thermal path and the powering o many thermochemical and photon chemical processes (including the thermochemica conversion of solar energy, solar gasification of hydrocarbon fossil fuel and biomas materials, the production of reduced-pollution or very low pollution liquid and gaseou fuels, and the production of a range of chemicals and other energy-rich products). When in use, the dish of this type of solar collector must be tracked to face the sun al day long in order to focus the incident solar energy on to a receiver (a solar energ absorber) which is placed at the focus of the dish. The tracking requirements are such tha any material (solid, liquid or gas) which is to be introduced to the receiver at the foca region must be conveyed along a moving path, for the receiver is on the axis of the dish which moves as a consequence of the sun-tracking. It is necessary, therefore, for flexibl or rotary joints to be included in the supply line to the receiver. When hig temperature/high pressure fluids are conveyed in the supply line, such joints are difficul to produce and, beyond certain temperatures and pressures, when they are available the are costly and detract from the economics of the processes to be powered by the collecte solar energy. Another problem with current solar collector dishes (including the dish depicted in the aforementioned WIPO Publication No WO 94/1 1918) is the adequate insulation of the fluid transmission line which conveys ground-based materials to and from the solar receiver. Such a line or pathway can be of considerable length and the cost penalty associated with its insulation and with the rotary or flexible joints in this line, which often has to weave through a structure of some complexity in order to reach the receiver, is a significant proportion of the cost of the whole collector system. In addition, significant pumping power may be required to convey the materials to the receiver, which is not readily accessible while moving, and instrumentation for the fluid transport system also poses problems. Another factor which affects the cost-effectiveness of tracking solar collector dishes is the actuation of the collector to face the sun. This requires robust equipment, which is able to cope with strong winds and which is accessible for inspection and mounting. Collectors having the usual apertures (e.g. circular, hexagonal, etc.) and employing altitude-azimuth tracking and, at the same time, having their reflecting structures balanced about the horizontal axis to reduce actuation effort, experience high wind loads at all times and the actuation mechanism and its associated hardware require special means for reaching some components when attention is needed, adding to the cost and inconvenience of even routine maintenance. Polar equatorial actuation also results in structures which are always relatively high off the ground. The construction of the paraboloidal (or spherical or other) reflecting surface of a big dish, which ensures that the sun's rays are always reflected on to the receiver (absorber), is also a costly exercise. This surface is sometimes approximated by a series of plane mirrors of sufficient number and of such size that the necessary concentrating ratio is achieved. Such mirrors need to be held in a frame which allows each segment of the mirror to focus on to the receiver (that is, the frame itself must be of the correct shape to achieve the necessary concentration of the solar energy). Except in the case of very low temperature receivers, the number of plane mirror segments must be large and more often curved mirrors are used. When the many plane mirror segments or curved mirrors are employed, a significant fraction of the dish cost is incurred by the establishment of the reflective surface, and considerable developmental effort has gone into producing more cost-effective surfaces during recent years. Disclosure of the present invention The present invention seeks to provide an energy concentrating dish arrangement which avoids, or reduces, the significant costs and other disadvantages, noted above, associated with current large dish solar collectors. In one broad form, the present invention provides an energy concentration device, comprising: a main collector dish to receive and reflect radiant energy; a supplementary reflector means, mounted on the focal axis of said main collector dish, to receive said energy reflected from said main collector dish and again reflect said radiant energy; and a receiver positioned substantially at the focal point of said supplementary reflector, to receive said radiant energy reflected from said supplementary reflector. Preferably, said receiver is provided at a fixed position , such as on the ground or at a relatively distant location. Also preferably, said main collector is comprised of a plurality of flat or curved reflector panels. In a preferred form, said main collector dish is paraboloidal, spherical or other shape, and, of aperture form, such as triangular, part circular or part hexagonal, whereby a low centre of mass is established. Preferably, said main collector dish has an offset focal axis. Also preferably, said supplementary reflector means comprises one or more flat or curved reflector panel(s). In a preferred embodiment, said main collector dish is provided with a space frame or space truss, such as a tetrahedral strut assembly or includes a plurality of tetrahedral truss assemblies. In a preferred form, said main collector dish is provided with a frame as described in PCT/AU93/00588 (WO94/1 1918). Perhaps most preferably, said device is utilised to concentrate solar energy. In a preferred embodiment said receiver comprises a solar energy absorber. Preferably, said solar energy absorber comprises means to introduce any material (solid, liquid or gas) to said absorber, characterised in that flexible and/or rotary joints are unnecessary. Preferably, said device is used as heliostats to illuminate a central receiver. In preferred embodiments said main dish is tracked utilising altitude/azimuth actuation, polar equatorial actuation or other actuation. In a modified and alternatively preferred form, said supplementary reflector is not used, and said receiver is provided in its place, mounted on the focal axis of said main collector dish. Removal of the secondary reflector system also allows the main reflector, with increased focal length, to be used as a heliostat. These and other features of the present invention will be further explained in the following description of embodiments of the present invention, which is provided by way of example only. In the following description, reference will be made to the accompanying drawing. Brief description of the drawings Figure 1 shows the position of the zone or point to which energy incident upon the supplementary (small) reflector of the present invention is directed, with reference to the dish rotation parameters for altitude/azimuth actuation of the main dish reflector. Figure 2 shows the position of the same zone or point with reference to the dish rotation parameters for polar equatorial actuation of the main dish. Figure 3 illustrates a symmetrical reflector dish arrangement, in accordance with the present invention. Figure 4 illustrates an offset dish arrangement in accordance with the present invention, with the main reflector dish having a triangular aperture. Figure 5 illustrates a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of a collector device in accordance with the present invention, comprised of a plurality of triangular shaped reflecting panels. Figure 6 shows different aperture shapes which may be utilised, in particular, Figure 6(a) illustrating an elongated dish, Figure 6(b) illustrating a truncated triangular dish, and, Figure 6(c) illustrating a triangular dish. Figure 7 illustrates an elevational view of a collector in accordance with the present invention with tetrahedral truss frame arrangement with a low centre of mass. Figure 8 shows a preferred embodiment of a modified form of the present invention, when the receiver is positioned at the focus of the main reflector. Detailed description of the illustrated embodiments When the present invention is to be adopted for a solar reflector dish having a short focal length, the receiver of the solar energy is preferably mounted on or close to the ground. Such receivers can be easily insulated. Materials can be supplied to (and removed from) the receiver readily and without the need for flexible or rotary joints. The receiver can have a more robust construction than a receiver which is intended to be mounted at the end of a supporting beam, at the focal point of a conventional large-aperture reflecting dish. The receiver in such an arrangement has to be positioned so that the centre (or the near-centre) of the receiver is on the centre point for rotation of all axes of movement of the main dish. In the case of altitude/azimuth actuation of the main dish, this point is fixed and must be on the line of the horizontal axis (for example, at the bisection point of this axis between the axis mounts) and also on the line of the vertical axis, close to the ground. This point is shown as point P in Figure 1. There is some latitude possible in choosing the location of P (i.e., by positioning the axes of rotation). In the case of polar equatorial mounts of the main dish, the same fixed point for the receiver location must be established. The polar axis of rotation of the dish is about this point, while the polar axis itself pivots up and down about this point, which is shown as point P in Figure 2. Similar considerations are used when deciding where the receiver should be positioned in the case of solar reflector dishes which are tracked using other actuation concepts. The important factor is that the pivot point of any other actuation arrangement, which is the nominal centre of the receiver, is to be fixed relative to the ground. In each embodiment of the present invention, the sun's rays are focused to the point P by a supplementary small (relative to the main dish) parabolic or spherical mirror (SR) of appropriate focal length. The aperture area, curvature and focal length of the supplementary reflector are set by the degree of concentration required, and by the properties of the main dish concentrator, which is described below. Generally, the aperture or area of the small reflector will be less than 5 per cent of the aperture of the main reflector, and typically will be about 2 per cent if the main mirror is designed to concentrate by a factor of around 50. However, the present invention is not limited to any specific aperture size of the small reflector. The small reflector SR may be arranged to hinge on its support, so that it can be moved to stop solar energy reaching the receiver when it is necessary to protect the receiver. The main reflector (MR) is the dominant solar energy collector and part concentrator of the solar energy. However, it is preferred that, instead of using curved panels, the main reflector is configured from plane mirror panels of appropriate size (typically a few square metres in area or larger). The small planar mirrors are mounted so that their total shape is an approximation to a paraboloid or spheroid. This method of construction of the main dish ensures that the mirror panels can be produced at low cost and with good accuracy. The reflector shape on which the mirrors are mounted can be achieved in any one of many ways (for example, using space trusses and space frames). The small reflector, SR, is mounted on the main reflector, MR, in such a manner that the centre line position occupied by SR is along the focal axis of MR, thereby ensuring that the main reflector delivers its concentrated rays on to SR. This combination of small and main reflectors is then mounted on the support frame which ensures that the focal point of SR coincides with P and this correspondence is maintained by the actuation mechanisms for all orientations of MR (especially when MR is facing the sun to collect solar energy). In this way, the sun's rays are focused to P at all times when the main dish (main reflector) is tracking the sun. Any suitable receiver, fixed to the ground at P. will receive all the focused energy. The same basic operation applies for altitude/azimuth, polar/equatorial or other tracking arrangements provided the sun's rays are focused at P. Solar concentrators of specified or designed concentration ratio can be realised by adjusting the number and size of flat mirror panels, both in the main and in the secondary concentrating mirror. Using curved panels still allows specific designed concentration ratios to be realised by adjusting the space positions of the mirror panel attachment points on the structure and providing appropriate curvature. By providing for adjustment of each mirror panel (on the main and/or secondary concentrating mirrors), the characteristics of the focal regions may be set to a wide range of intensities, from near constant to other more complex properties - several focii can also be produced in the focal planes. The present invention can be implemented with the aperture of the main concentrator having any suitable shape. However, there are advantages in choosing a main reflector aperture shape which has particular benefits, and there are gains in producing a collector system which has a low profile when in the "parked" position, as this alleviates forces experienced in strong winds (and thus reduces the cost of assembly of the main dish and its supporting framework). Typically, the mirror shell may be of a paraboloidal, spherical or other shape, but of chosen aperture form, such as circular, hexagonal, triangular, etc., to suit needs and design requirements, and is positioned in space to face the sun, thereby gathering energy all day. While the above features can be introduced to dishes of any form of construction, they lend themselves to the use of the concepts employing tetrahedral frames, etc., such as described in the aforementioned publication WO94/1 1918. Figure 3 illustrates a symmetrical collector arrangement of the present invention which requires the dish collector to be placed above the ground by an amount at least equal to the dish radius. This arrangement is not the most preferred implementation of the present invention, for this type of concentrator will experience large loads in strong winds. By offsetting the small reflector SR towards the edge of the main dish - as a result of the focal axis being so offset, as shown in Figure 4(a) - the main dish can be placed closer to the ground, where it will experience smaller wind loads and where it will also be within easy reach for inspection, adjustment and repair. The main dish can still be essentially balanced about the horizontal axis by choosing the point P appropriately. The method of pointing to the sun may also be chosen from many possibilities, but a preferred method is that which allows the moving structures to sit close to the ground when placed in a 'survival' position (when wind velocity is very high), thereby realising a structure which is more economical as it does not have to withstand such high wind forces. For example, the usual way to allow tracking of such collectors requires the unit's horizontal axis to be placed above the ground at least half the dish diameter above ground, in the case of altitude/azimuth actuation, and also well above ground for polar equatorial actuation. The reduced wind load feature can be further assisted by establishing an aperture shape for the main reflector which is triangular (as illustrated in Figure 4(b)) or which is elongated, rectangular or another appropriate shape which lowers and biases the centre of mass towards the lower edge of MR. Such an arrangement places a broad section of the main dish near the point P thus ensuring that the main weight distribution is biased closer to P on the base line. That is, when the main dish pivots on its horizontal axis and faces horizontally, the small, supplementary reflector is very close to the ground. This ensures that the driving forces to position the dish are small, having to cope only with some relatively slight unbalanced wind forces, in the case of the horizontal axis drive. The offset focal axis arrangement described above, which applies more readily to altitude/azimuth tracking, apart from presenting a low profile to the wind when the main dish is parked facing vertically upwards to enable it to ride out very strong winds, also has the following advantages: (a) the shading of other solar collectors which may be situated in an east-west array is reduced by the triangular profile, thereby permitting more effective energy collection by the array in early morning and late afternoon; (b) the horizontal axis can be balanced as regards mass and thus less energy will be required to drive the main dish to track the sun; (c) all actuation mechanisms, the small reflector SR, and the solar energy receiver are readily accessible from ground level; and (d) the instrumentation, monitoring and control of processes ongoing at the receiver are more accessible - particularly when fluids are conveyed for processing, such as in the case of steam systems where a significant degree of superheat can be lost in the lines between receiver and the ground. In Figure 5 is illustrated a preferred arrangement of a fixed receiver collector in which the horizontal axis of rotation coincides with the horizontal axis centre of mass. Both of these axes intersect the vertical axis of rotation at the nominal focus of the collector system, where the fixed receiver is positioned. In Figure 6 is shown dish apertures of different forms with corresponding horizontal axis positions. These forms are not exclusive of others, which may be circular, hexagonal, square and others. The triangular/tetrahedral-based forms, however, carry some advantages which cause them to be preferred. These forms are the more preferred when the 'bottom' edge is about the widest part of the dish, and there is a tapering towards the top, as this facilitates the positioning of the horizontal axis nearer to the bottom edge and allows the dish to sit with lower profile to the ground when facing vertically upwards in the survival position. Thus half circles and half hexagons or 'half squares, etc., produce more readily balanced horizontal dish axes allowing the dish to present a lower profile. In Figure 7 is shown a side view of Figure 5, illustrating (with Figure 5), a tetrahedral truss arrangement with a low centre of mass; and showing also the optical arrangements. In Figure 8 is shown an arrangement without secondary concentrator (or reflector) in which a receiver is placed in the focal region of the main concentrator (reflector). This still produces a low profile dish system of balanced horizontal axis. With no fixed receiver, there is no need to constrain the horizontal and vertical axes to intersect. Figure 8 illustrates an arrangement whereby the two axes do not intersect. Figure 8 could also portray an arrangement of a heloostat for illuminating a distant central receiver; in this case the focal length of the main reflector would be long compared to that employed in Figure 8 to illuminate a dish-mounted receiver. In referring to Figure 5 to 7, the reference numerals which would should be utilised to identify the features are as follows: 1. Front frame of dish; that which holds the reflector mirror panels. 2. Rear frame of the dish; 3. Connecting members which form tetrahedral frames with the front and rear frames; 4. Position of nominal focus; 5. Horizontal axis of rotation of the dish. In the case of altitude/azimuth actuation, the axis is carried on the base frame of the collector which in turn rotates about a vertical axis. In the case of the fixed receiver configuration, this vertical axis passes through the focus, as defined in Figures 1 to 4 inclusive, as does the horizontal axis. 6. Horizontal centre of mass of the dish, including all members and structures which move with the dish itself - for example, the secondary concentrator and its means of support on the dish (tower, mast with guys, etc.). This axis should ideally coincide with the horizontal axis of rotation, or be near to it in order to produce a balanced system which requires reduced actuation force and energy, relative to non-coincidence of these axes. By ensuring that the horizontal axis of rotation is as close as practicable to the 'bottom' edge of the dish ('bottom' is understood to refer to a dish which faces horizontally - see Figure 5 for example), and that this axis is as close as practicable to the ground without causing the dish 'bottom " edge to touch the ground, the dish and overall collector sets very close to the ground when placed in the vertically-facing (survival) position, presenting a low wind profile. Axes 5,6 can be arranged to be biased towards the dish 'bottom' edge by the choice of dish aperture, by taking account of the secondary concentrator (8) and its support; or the receiver in the case of systems in which a fixed receiver is not used (e.g. Figure 8). 7. Vertical axis of rotation. In the case of the fixed receiver option, this coincides with the centre of rotation of the base frame. This restriction is not necessary for receivers carried on the dish, as for example, Figure 8, in which the horizontal and vertical axes do not intersect. 8. Secondary concentrator support such that the main reflectors, together with the secondary concentrator, produce a focus a Point P (10). 9. Opening in the reflective surface of the main concentrator to allow the concentrated rays of solar energy to reach the fixed receiver. 10. Point P, the nominal focus of the collector system (as defined by Figures 1 to 4 inclusive). 1 1. Rotating base frame which carries the horizontal axis of the dish. 12. Secondary concentrator support (or support for a dish-mounted receiver as in Figure 8). This support may take many forms - for example, a tower with offset mount, as illustrated in Figures 5 and 7, a tripod or similar (as shown in Application PCT/AU93/00588), a guyed mast, as illustrated in Figure 7, or others. 13. Plurality of reflective mirror panels attached to the frame of the dish. These panels may be triangular (or other form in the case of other dish geometrical forms), the triangles in turn may be composed of one of more mirror tiles which in turn may be plane or curved to conform to the required dish surface profile - paraboloidal, spherical, etc. With plane (flat) tiles, the desired profile is achieved by the holding structure itself, the plane tiles approximating, to required degree, the reflecting surface. 13a. Plurality of reflecting mirror panels for the secondary concentrator, as for 13. 14. Receiver mounted on the dish in the case of Figure 8. 15. Guy wires stabilising the receiver. 16. Support mast in Figure 8 - an alternative means for mounting the receiver (See 12 as a further option). 17. Centre of mass of the dish/secondary reflector and support structure. 18. Receiver mounted on ground. Figure 5 to 7 employ triangular panels and tetrahedral shapes. These are the preferred configurations due to rigidity, light weight and ease of manufacture and assembly and consequently economics, however, other shapes of mirror panels and other means for constructing the structures which realise this invention are possible, using different technology. As identified in the Figures, the invention provides several novel features, including the off-centre though balanced horizontal axis, (to reduce actuation power); a low slung unit which has less wind load since it is closer to the ground when placed in the survival (vertically facing) position, resulting in less cost of material; accessibility to all components from the ground without lifting devices (an important factor when it comes to maintenance and adjustment); an aperture which causes less shading (morning and afternoon when the sun is low) on other collectors to the west and east (due to the shape); a collector which has a specifiable concentration ratio (by changing the size and shape and/or curvature of the mirror panels on the main reflector and/or the supplementary reflector when used), allowing collectors to be designed to satisfy a multitude of different applications; a collector which uses standard commercial processes for its manufacture. To achieve balanced motion about the horizontal axis, this axis is placed near to the horizontal centre of mass axis (ideally, coincident with it). To achieve, at the same time, a low profile when parked vertically facing in the survival position, the horizontal axis is placed near to the ground and near to the 'bottom' edge of the dish ('bottom' is understood to apply when the dish is facing horizontally). To facilitate the horizontal axis centre of mass being as close as practicable to the 'bottom' edge of the dish a dish aperture is chosen which has a wide dimension at the 'bottom', tapering to a narrower dimension at the 'top'. This is readily achieved when using tetrahedral elements to realise the configurations. The figures show several examples of such apertures; counterweights not needed. Such an aperture also reduces shading effects on near collectors to the west and the east, respectively near sunrise and sunset. Apart from the profiles and apertures indicated above as preferred, various other profiles and apertures are practicable; there are no fundamental limitations on the dish profiles and apertures from the viewpoint of working systems but economics and technological convenience suggest the preferred options. The same overall concepts indicated in this invention, while directed to the balanced/off- axis dish, with fixed receiver placed at or near the intersection point of the axes of rotation, may be employed to realise dishes with receivers placed in the focal plane of the main reflector and to realise heliostats to illuminate a distant fixed receiver (the so-called 'central receiver' concept in which a number of heliostats illuminate one fixed receiver on a tower). In both the latter cases, there is no requirement to employ axes with a common intersection point at which the receiver is placed; this arrangement still however retains the advantages of the balanced 'off centre' horizontal axis and low-slung reflector, as well as the ability to use flat or curved mirror panels, and the capacity to design concentration ratio to specification. It will therefore be appreciated that the collector arrangement of the present invention is particularly useful with the dish structures and hydraulic control arrangements described in W094/1 1918, particularly with regard to modularity, use of a plurality of tetrahedra, actuation (although the are other ways to achieve the motion of the axes) etc. As such, the combination of the collector arrangement herein described in conjunction with the structures and systems described in W094/1 1918 should be considered to be within the scope of this invention. There is one minor disadvantage with the present invention, namely, the loss of (typically) about 4 per cent of energy because two reflections are required before the energy reaches the receiver, instead of the single reflection from the dish of a conventional solar energy reflector. (Most currently achievable reflecting surfaces have a reflectivity of about 95 to 96 per cent). However, this loss of energy can be readily compensated by an increase in the size of the main collector of the present invention. This carries only very slight cost penalties. Those familiar with solar energy collection arrangements will appreciate that (as noted above), the present inventive concept may also be used in heliostats, provided the small reflector has a long focal length, for the present invention enables a strong and accurately constructed main dish to be established, which will ensure that received and collected solar energy is transferred to a remote receiver, even if strong winds (which might otherwise distort the collector assembly) are present. It should also be noted that a modified form of the present invention may be useful in some instances. In this modified form, instead of placing a small reflector as shown and having a fixed receiver on the ground, the receiver is mounted at the position of SR as shown in Figure 4(b) and more plane mirror panels, or curved mirror panels, are used for the main dish. This arrangement, although not preferred, is superior to a normal large dish with its solar energy receiver mounted at a central focus because of the advantages of (i) less shading between rows of collectors in an array and (ii) the use of a low-profile, yet balanced, horizontal axis as well as (iii) having all actuator mechanisms and the receiver (when the dish faces horizontally) very close to the ground. Heliostats can also be realised without the secondary reflector by employing a long focal length main reflector. More care has to be taken when the present invention is used with a polar equatorial mounting of the tracking main dish and the arrangement shown in Figure 4(b) is used. The aperture shape of the main dish may need to be modified to prevent the dish from coming into contact with the ground when the sun is only just above the horizon. Although several specific realisations of the present invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that variations to such realisations may be made without departing from the present inventive concept.

Claims: THE CLAIMS 1. An energy concentration device, comprising: a main collector dish to receive and reflect radiant energy; a supplementary reflector means, mounted on the focal axis of said main collector dish, to receive said energy reflected from said main collector dish and again reflect said radiant energy; and a receiver positioned substantially at the focal point of said supplementary reflector, to receive said radiant energy reflected from said supplementary reflector. 2. An energy concentration device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said receiver is provided at a fixed position , such as on the ground or at a relatively distant location. 3. An energy concentration device as claimed in claims 1 or 2, wherein said main collector is comprised of a plurality of flat or curved reflector panels. 4. An energy concentration device as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein said main collector dish is paraboloidal, spherical or other shape and of aperture form such as triangular or hexagonal whereby a low centre of mass is established. 5. An energy concentration device as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein said main collector dish has an offset focal axis. 6. An energy concentration device as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said supplementary reflector means comprises one or more flat or curved reflector panel(s). 7. An energy concentration device as claimed in any one claims 1 to 6, wherein said main collector dish is provided with a space frame or space truss, such as a tetrahedral strut assembly. 8. An energy concentration device as claimed in claim 7, wherein said main collector dish is provided with a frame as described in PCT/AU93/00588 (WO94/11918). 9. An energy concentration device as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8. wherein said device is utilised to concentrate solar energy. 10. An energy concentrating device as claimed in claim 9, wherein said receiver comprises a solar energy absorber. 1 1. An energy concentration device as claimed in claim 10, wherein said solar energy absorber comprises means to introduce any material (solid, liquid or gas) to said absorber, characterised in that flexible and/or rotary joints are unnecessary. 12. An energy concentration device as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 1 1, when used as heliostats to illuminate a central receiver. 13. An energy concentrating device as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein said main dish is tracked utilising altitude/azimuth actuation, polar equatorial actuation or other actuation. 14. An energy concentrating device as claimed in claim 1, wherein, said supplementary reflector is not used, and said receiver is provided in its place, mounted on the focal axis of said main collector dish (wherein the horizontal and vertical axes do no need to intersect). 15. An energy concentrating device, substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying drawings. 16. A method of concentrating radiant energy, substantially as herein described.

Inventors: KANEFF STEPHEN, KANEFF, STEPHEN
Applicants: ANUTECH PTY LTD, KANEFF STEPHEN, ANUTECH PTY LIMITED, KANEFF, STEPHEN
Application year: 1995
Main classification: F24J2
IPC codes: F24J2, H01L31