ENHANCEMENT OF THE EFFICACY OF DRUGS BY DEUTERATION

Abstract: A method of enhancing the efficiency and increasing the duration of action of drugs (e.g. dihydropyridines) and particularly of nifedipine wherein one or more hydrogen atoms are deuterated and wherein the deuterated nifedipine has unexpectedly improved hypotensive properties when used in much lower concentrations than nifedipine per se. A method for determining the identity and bioequivalency of a new drug is also disclosed wherein the molecular and isotope structure of a new drug is determined by gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry and compared with the molecular and isotope structure of a known human drug.

Description: ENHANCEMENT OF THE EFFICACY OF DRUGS BY DEUTERATION REFERENCE TO A RELATED APPLICATION 5 This is a continuation-in-part of our copending U.S. Patent Application * ■ Serial No. 08/217,897 filed March 25, 1994 which is relied on and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a process for enhancing the efficacy of 10 known pharmaceuticals or drugs, and to the enhanced drugs so produced, by changing the isotopic form of the molecular structure of the known drug. More particularly, the present invention relates to the modification of the molecular structure of known drugs containing one or more hydrogen atoms by deuterating one or more of the hydrogen atoms to deuterium atoms. The resulting drug is significantly altered and has greatly 15 improved activity over the known drug. Most particularly this invention relates to a method of deuterating a dihydropyridine (e.g., nifedipine) whereby the deuterated nifedipine has an increased hypotensive effect and an increased duration of action on mammals at lower concentration than does nifedipine. When pharmaceuticals are synthesized, a carbon back-bone is assembled 20 having various substituents including carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, etc. Pharmaceuticals have been designed and synthesized by a number of modes including, for example, serendipity and molecular modification. These and other methods have generated a vast number of drugs over the course of time. As such modifications have 1 allowed individual companies to keep a competitive edge in the marketplace, a «. 25 1 SUBSTITUTE SHEET significant part of the industry's time and resources is spent searching for novel agents within certain pharmacologic classifications, e.g., antihypertensives. Such novel agents often have different activities from the prototype compounds, thus justifying the monies spent for their development. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is known that virtually all drugs now marketed include a number of hydrogen atoms, each of which has a molecular mass of one. It has now been found that when one or more of the hydrogen atoms on a drug are modified so that their molecular mass becomes two, the activity of the drug is significantly altered and is even greatly improved. Thus, for example, isotopic modification of a dihydropyridine, e.g. , such as nifedipine, has resulted in an unexpected change in the hypotensive (blood pressure lowering) effect in mammals compared to nifedipine per se, and such effects should also be achieved with humans. Nifedipine is marketed worldwide as an important drug used in the treatment of angina and hypertension. Its structure is as follows: By modifying nifedipine by replacing one or more hydrogens of the methyl groups with deuterium or by replacing one or more of the methyl groups with CD 3 , the therapeutic properties of nifedipine can be altered and can even be significantly improved. For example, by modifying the nifedipine by replacing the two methyl groups at the 2 and 6 positions on the ring with two deuterated groups (CD 3 ), i.e., 2 SUBSTITUTE SHEET replacing 6 hydrogen atoms with six deuterium atoms, the structure of the deuterated nifedipine is as follows: Both of the above molecules are nifedipine and the latter structure is an isotopic form of the former. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING The present invention will be further understood with reference to the drawings, wherein: Figure 1 shows the hypotensive effect of the various concentrations of the deuterated nifedipines on the treated rats as compared with nifedipine per se; Figures 2 and 3 show use dependent inhibition of control nifedipine (Nifedipine B) and deuterated nifedipine (Nifedipine D) on T type calcium channels; Figure 4 shows the effect of control nifedipine and deuterated nifedipine on calcium current inhibition as a function of pulse frequency; Figure 5 shows the effect of control nifedipine and deuterated nifedipine on use dependency; Figures 6(a) and (b) show the effect of control and deuterated nifedipine on mean arterial pressure; Figures 7(a) and (b) show concentration-effect relationships for control (Figure 7(a)) and deuterated (Figure 7(b)) nifedipine fitted using an asymmetric sigmoidal model; 3 SUBSTITUTE SHEET Figures 8(a) and (b) show concentration-effect relationships for control (Figure 8(a)) and deuterated (Figure 8(b)) nifedipine fitted using logistic dose response model; Figures 9a and 9b show the dose-response effect for the control and deuterated (test) nicardipines; Figure 10 shows the duration of effect was greater for deuterated nicardipine compared to control nicardipine; Figure 11 shows the hypotensive effect of the various concentrations of the deuterated verapamil on the treated rats as compared with verapamil er se; Figure 12 shows the duration of effect was greater for deuterated verapamil compared to control verapamil; Figure 13 shows a three dimensional "fingerprint" of seven nifedipine preparations; Figure 14 shows a two dimensional "fingerprint" of nine nifedipine preparations; Figure 15 shows a two dimensional (oxygen vs. carbon) "fingerprint" of solatol crude tablets; Figure 16 shows "fingerprints" of three different hair samples from three different people; and Figure 17 shows a two dimensional carbon-oxygen "fingerprint" of three liquors. TOETA TT-En DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Such modification of nifedipine (and other dihydropyridines such as, for example, nicardipine, nimodipine, niludipine, nisoldipine, nitrendipine, felodipine, 4 SUBSTITUTE SHEET ifradipine and amlodipine) can be achieved by dissolving the nifedipine in a deuteration tube in a mixture of deuterochloroform and deuterium oxide, and then adding a minor amount of trifluoroacetic anhydride and deuteroacetone thereto and mixing therewith. The solution is then frozen within the tube, preferably by immersing the tube in liquid nitrogen and then sealing the tube. The sealed tube is then heated at a temperature with the range of from about 50° to about 65°C, and preferably within the range of about 55° to about 60°C and maintained at that temperature for a period of time sufficient to deuterate the methyl group at the 2 and 6 positions on the nifedipine to CD 3 . A time of from about 150 to about 180 hours is effective to complete the reaction, with a time of about 160 to 170 hours being preferred. Deuterated nifedipine was synthesized in the following manner: EXAMPLE I 80 mg of nifedipine in powder form was placed into a special deuteration tube and dissolved therein in a mixture of 2 ml of deuterochloroform and 0.5 ml of deuterium oxide after which 0.2 ml of trifluoroacetic anhydride and 2 ml of deuteroacetone were added and mixed therewith. The solution was frozen in liquid nitrogen and the tube flame sealed under nitrogen. The tube was then heated at 57 °C for 168 hours after which it was cooled and opened. The contents of the tube were transferred to a round-bottom flask and the solvent was removed in vacuo on a rotovap. All operations were conducted under reduced intensity of light. Using conventional H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) the deuterium substitution was calculated to be 95% of the C-2 and C-6 methyl groups shown above. The effect of the deuterated nifedipine on the blood pressure in rats was then determined as follows: 5 SUBSTITUTE SHEET EXAMPLE Π Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were anesthetized with pentobarbital (65 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) and a carotid artery and jugular vein cannulated. Blood pressure was continuously monitored via the carotid artery cannula. Nifedipine samples, both deuterated and non-deuterated, dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were diluted in saline so that the final injected concentration of DMSO was less than 0.025% by volume. Aliquots of appropriate dilutions were then injected intravenously in the SHR and blood pressure effects monitored for at least two hours following injection. Doses used were 0.00001, 0.00002, 0.000025, and 0.00005 millimoles per rat in the control group and in the test group. All rats were within 25 grams of body weight of each other. The results are shown in Figure 1. At the three lower concentrations the hypotensive effect of deuterated nifedipine was greater than that of regular nifedipine (p=0.08 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Effective doses of 50% of the rats (ED J0 's) were calculated on the basis of the results from the above doses and results were: (1) Log EU 50 deuterated nifedipine: -4.48 (-4.53 to -4.43, 95% confidence interval); and (2) Log ED J0 regular nifedipine: -4.36 (-4.40 to -4.31, 95% confidence interval). As the confidence intervals do not overlap, there is a statistical difference in the potency of the two nifedipine products, with the deuterated nifedipine unexpectedly having the greatest potency. The effect of deuterated nifedipine on calcium channel blocking activity was studied and the studies were carried out using the whole cell version of the patch clamp method, as follows: 6 SUBSTITUTE SHEET EXAMPLE HI NIE-115 cells (neuroblastoma cell line) were used and these cells were cultured using conventional tissue culture techniques. For study, cells were used six to eight hours after trypsinization and replating. In this state the predominant calcium channel expressed was the T-type channel, which was used for the current studies. Patch clamping was carried out using the following external and internal solutions: External solution (in mM): BaCl 2 20, Tris 105, KC1 5, CsCl 5, HEPES 20, glucose 20 and tetrodotoxin 0.0005. Internal solutions (in mM): CsCl 130, ATP-Na 2 2, HEPES 20, glucose 5, MGC1 2 5, cAMP 0.25, and EGTA 10. Osmolarity of all solutions was adjusted to 310-320 mOsm and the pH adjusted to 7.4 using HC1, NaOH, CsOH or Ba(OH) 2 as required. The Petri dish containing the cells was mounted on the stage of an inverted phase contrast microscope. Pipettes fabricated from thin-walled borosilicate glass, and containing the internal solution, were advanced to the selected cell surface using a micromanipulator. Suction facilitated the formation of a membrane patch with resistance in the range of 20-30 gigaohms. Test pulses in increments of 10 mV were applied for 200 msec with at least 5 sec allowed for channel recovery between pulses. Basal channel activity was measured based on the peak inward currents. After addition of the nifedipine solutions to the appropriate concentration, 3 minutes were allowed for the drug to reach equilibrium concentrations. After this time current-voltage relationships were re-tested and the results expressed as the percentage of control current obtained (i.e., 100% indicates no channel blocking activity). Preliminary results at concentrations of 1 x 10* and 1 x 10 "5 showed no statistical difference between channel conductance for deuterated and non-deuterated nifedipine (70% vs. 77%, and 35% and 43%, respectively, p-not significant). During 7 SUBSTITUTE SHEET these studies, however, it was noted that a difference did exist between the channel activation dependency of the two nifedipine compounds. As usual, normal nifedipine showed blocking activity which is dependent on the state of activation of the channels (normally blocking is facilitated when channels are more "active"). This effect was not seen for deuterated nifedipine; rather, it seemed to show continual maximal effect regardless of channel status. This suggests that the binding of deuterated nifedipine to the calcium channel is enhanced even though there may be no difference in potency. Clinically, this means that deuterated nifedipine may have a longer half-life of the receptor and/or that it may have a constant effect across blood pressure ranges (normally the higher the blood pressure, the greater the hypotensive effect of calcium channel blockers). It is expected that the deuterated nifedipine would act in a similar manner in humans having high blood pressure. While it has been noted that deuterizing one or more hydrogen atoms in known pharmaceutical compounds will enhance or alter the activity of such compounds, it is believed that the activity of such compounds may also be altered by substituting a different isotope for one or more of the other atoms in the compound. It is known that several varieties of other atoms, such as carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, tin, etc., exist which differ in their atomic mass. These differing species of atoms are referred to as isotopes and differ only in the number of neutrons in the nucleus. EXAMPLE IV Use dependency of calcium channel inhibition-Repetitive activation of calcium channels progressively reduces the peak inward current. Such a decrease in cunent occurs more markedly the greater the frequency of stimulation of the channels. In the presence of a "use dependent" antagonist, the decrease in current with repetitive 8 SUBSTITUTE SHEET stimulation is enhanced. Use dependency implies that the antagonist binds cumulatively in small increments during subsequent channel activations. After 2 or 3 channel activations in the case of calcium channels, a steady state of inhibition is reached. The underlying implication of use dependence is that a given antagonist (drug) binds more strongly to the active channel. A drug which shows greater use dependent channel inhibition is presumed to have a greater affinity for the active calcium channel. In the following set of examples, calcium channels were depolarized with repetitive pulses of current at the intervals indicated. Such studies were carried out using the whole cell version of the patch-clamp. The reduction of inward current as a function of the interval between pulses in the absence of any drug was taken as the control. Control (i.e., non-deuterated) and deuterated nifedipine were then applied to the cells at a concentration of 5 micromolar. The decrease in inward current as a function of frequency of stimulation (i.e., use dependence) was then compared between the two nifedipine preparations. Figure 2 shows use dependent inhibition of control nifedipine (Nifedipine B) and deuterated nifedipine (Nifedipine D) on T type calcium channels in N1E 115 cells. This figure represents inward current flow and its inhibition by the nifedipines. As frequency of stimulation increases, inward current upon repetitive stimulation decreases (use dependence). Nifedipine is seen to decrease inward current, but at increased stimulation frequency deuterated nifedipine is more effective than control nifedipine (panel C). These differences are further shown in Figures 3-5. Figure 3 represents the inhibitory effect of the two nifedipines on inward calcium current for repetitive 1 second pulses (depolarizations). At this pulse frequency deuterated nifedipine is more effective at blocking calcium current than control current 9 SUBSTITUTE SHEET (p < .05 by repeated measures ANOVA). Concentrations of nifedipine were 5 micromolar in both cases. Figure 4 shows the effect of the two nifedipines on calcium current inhibition as a function of pulse frequency. At 1 and 0.3 second intervals deuterated nifedipine was more effective than control nifedipine in blocking the calcium channels. Figure 5 shows the effect of the two nifedipines on use dependency. At all frequencies deuterated nifedipine showed greater use dependent calcium channel inhibition. Such inhibition was even more marked as frequency of stimulation increased. Based on the above data, deuterated nifedipine is seen to have greater use dependent inhibition of calcium channels. This means that deuterated nifedipine is more effective than regular nifedipine at blocking the calcium channels as the frequency of stimulation increases. Because channel activation is greater in pathological conditions such as hypertension or angina, deuterated nifedipine would be expected to be more efficacious/potent in these disorders than regular nifedipine. In non-pathological conditions where channel activation is not as great, however, the activity of deuterated nifedipine would approach that of regular nifedipine. Such a characteristic is extremely appealing as it means that the relative potency of the drug (e.g., deuterated nifedipine) would vary directly with the severity of the condition. Thus, for example, the drug would seemingly "know" how much to reduce the blood pressure in order to achieve a particular blood pressure goal. Currently, as the severity of a condition (e.g., hypertension, angina) increases, the dose of nifedipine necessary to treat such a condition also increases. Such may not be the case for deuterated nifedipine. 10 SUBSTITUTE SHEET EXAMPLE V Effect of deuterated and control nifedipines on blood pressure in normotensive Sprague-Dawley rats. Control and deuterated nifedipines were dissolved in minimal volumes of ethanol and diluted until the final concentration of ethanol was less than 0.04%. One milliliter doses of the two nifedipines at the indicated concentrations were then injected into pentobarbital-anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 300 and 350 grams. The maximum change in mean arterial pressure, as well as the duration of hypotensive response, were measured directly by means of an intra-arterial catheter. Only one drug dose was given to each rat and a minimum of 60 minutes was allowed for blood pressure to return to baseline. Results are shown in the figures discussed below. At each time period the duration of effect was greater for deuterated nifedipine compared to control nifedipine. However, because the duration of response might be dependent on the magnitude of decrease in blood pressure, equipotent doses of the two formulations were compared. In this comparison, control nifedipine at a concentration of 2 x 10 ~3 molar and deuterated nifedipine at a concentration of 1 x 10 "3 molar were compared (relative potencies -45.8 vs. -40.3 mmHg control vs. deuterated, p=NS). At these doses, despite an equivalent blood pressure effect, the duration of action of control nifedipine was 46.5 min and the duration of action of deuterated nifedipine was 62.2 min (p=.02). Thus, the duration of action of deuterated nifedipine is greater than that of control nifedipine independent of blood pressure lowering effectiveness (i.e., both potency and duration of action differ). Figure 6 shows the effect of control and deuterated nifedipine on mean arterial pressure: Figure 6(a) shows actual values plotted, Figure 6(b) shows curves fitted to data by logistic dose-response regression. A total of six rats were tested at each 11 SUBSTITUTE SHEET dose. As can be seen, at all doses deuterated nifedipine was more potent than control nifedipine (p < .05 by repeated measures ANOVA). MAP = mean arterial pressure Figure 7 shows concentration-effect relationships for control (Figure 7(a)) and deuterated (Figure 7(b)) nifedipine fitted using an asymmetric sigmoidal model. Fitted values plus 95% confidence intervals are shown. From these two graphs, based on a lack of overlap between the confidence intervals, it is evident that the concentration-effect relationships for the two nifedipines differ. To be more precise, curve fitting was carried out using the equation: y =a- b(l-(l +exp((x+dln(2 1 c -l)-c)/d))" e ). On this basis the parameters a, b and e all differed statistically at p < .05. Figure 8 shows concentration-effect relationships for control (Figure 8(a)) and deuterated (Figure 8(b)) nifedipine fitted using logistic dose response model. Fitted values plus 95% confidence intervals are shown. From these two graphs, based on a lack of overlap between the confidence intervals, it is evident that the concentration-effect relationships for the two nifedipines differ. To be more precise, curve fitting was carried out using the equation: y=a+b/(l+(x/c) d ). On this basis the parameters a and b all differed statistically at p < .05. EXAMPLE VI Effect of deuterated control nicardipines on blood pressure in normotensive Sprague-Dawley rats. Control and deuterated nicardipines (prepared, as described below, in a manner analogous to the preparation of deuterated nifedipine) were dissolved in minimal volumes of ethanol and diluted until the final concentration of ethanol was less than 0.04%. Doses of the two nicardipines as indicated were then injected into pentobarbital-anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 300 and 350 grams. The maximum change in mean arterial pressure, as well as the duration of 12 SUBSTITUTE SHEET hypotensive response, were measured directly by means of an intra-aiterial catheter. Only one drug dose was given to each rat and a minimum of 60 minutes was allowed for blood pressure to return to baseline Potency-Figures 9a and 9b show the dose-response effect for the control and deuterated (test) nicardipines. Although the confidence intervals of the curves overlap in areas, statistical comparison of ED 16 , ED^, and ED^ showed the following differences: ED 16 control 6.11x10"* mmoles 95% CI: 2.2-16.8X10- 6 deuterated 46.2x10^ mmoles 37.3-57.2x10^ EU 50 control 2.54xl0- 3 mmoles 95% CI: 1.53-4.20xl0- 3 deuterated 2.11xl0' 3 mmoles 1.48-3.00xl0- 3 ED M control 1.06 mmoles 95% CI: 0.38-2.91 deuterated 0.09 mmoles 0.077-0.119 95% CI = 95% confidence : interval From the above table, it can be seen that the confidence intervals are exclusive for both ED 16 and ED M . This indicates that the nature of the dose response relationships differs. This is confirmed by differing slope functions of 416 for control nicardipine and 46 for deuterated nicardipine (as calculated by Litchfield-Wilcoxon method). Thus, the potencies of the two formulations differ. Two-way analysis of variance using dose and formulation as independent variables and reduction in mean arterial pressure as the dependent variable revealed the following ANOVA table: 13 SUBSTITUTE SHEET factor. d.f. sum of mean F P value squares square drug 1 323 323 3.11 .082 dose 17 5531 3255 30.8 .0001 drug x dose 17 6464 380 3.6 .0001 Although there is no difference at a p< .05 level for drug differences (there is a difference at the .1 level, however), the lack of difference is likely due to the many doses clustered around the ED^ where the curves do not differ. There is a marked drug x dose interaction, however, which does implies a difference in the nature of the dose-response curves Duration of action- At most time periods the duration of effect was greater for deuterated nicardipine compared to control nicardipine (Figure 10). Because the duration of response might be dependent on the magnitude of decrease in blood pressure, however, equipotent doses of the two formulations were compared. In this comparison, control nicardipine at a dose of 1 x 10 ~9 moles and deuterated nicardipine at a concentration of 3 x 10 "9 moles were compared (relative potencies - 13.8 vs -13.8 mmHg control vs deuterated, p = NS). At these doses, despite an equivalent blood pressure effect, the duration of action of control nicardipine was 5.4 + 3.8 (SD) min and the duration of action of deuterated nicardipine was 15.0 + 6.4 (SD) min (p=.049 by Mann-Whitney U-test). Thus, the duration of action of deuterated nicardipine is greater than that of control nicardipine independent of blood pressure lowering effectiveness. Comparison of duration of action by two-way ANOVA using dose and formulation as independent variables and duration of action as the dependent variable revealed the following ANOVA table: 14 SUBSTITUTE SHEET factor d.f. sum of mean F p - value squares square drug 1 5697 5697 24.0 .0001 dose 14 68292 4878 20.6 .ύooi drug x dose 14 10678 237 3.2 .0002 These results show significant differences in the duration of action of the two drugs as well as implying a difference in the nature of the dose-duration of action relationship. Based on the above data, deuterated nicardipine differs from control nicardipine both in the nature of the blood pressure-lowering dose-response effect as well as in duration of action. EXAMPLE Vπ Preparation of deuterated nicardipine. Such modification of nicardipine (and other dihydropyridines) can be achieved by dissolving the nicardipine in a deuteration tube in a mixture of deuterochloroform and deuterium oxide, and then adding a minor amount of trifluoroacetic anhydride and deuterocacetone thereto and mixing therewith. The solution is then frozen within the tube, preferably by immersing the tube in liquid nitrogen and then sealing the tube. The sealed tube is then heated at a temperature within the range of from about 50° to about 65 °C, and preferably within the range of about 55° to about 60°C, and maintained at that temperature for a period of time sufficient to deuterate the methyl group at 2 and 6 positions on the nicardipine to CD 3 . A time of from about 150 to about 180 hours is effective to complete the reaction, with a time of about 160 to 170 hours being preferred. Deuterated nicardipine was synthesized in the following manner: 80 mg of mcardipine in powder form was placed into a special deuteration tube and dissolved 15 SUBSTITUTE SHEET therein in a mixture of 2 ml of deuterochloroform and 0.5 ml of deuterium oxide after which 0.2 ml of trifluoroacetic anhydride and 2 ml of deuteroacetone were added and mixed therewith. The solution was frozen in liquid nitrogen and the tube flamed sealed under nitrogen. The tube was then heated at 57 * C for 168 hours after which it was cooled and opened. The contents of the tube were transferred to a round-bottom flask and the solvent was removed in vacuo on a rotovap. All operations were conducted under reduced intensity of light. Using conventional H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) the deuterium substitution was calculated to be 95% of the C-2 and C-6 methyl groups shown above. Given the profound effects of substitution of deuterium for hydrogen in the methyl groups attached to positions 2 and 6 of the dihydropyridine ring, and given the fact that all dihydropyridine calcium channel Mockers have at least one methyl group in these positions (in fact, all dihydropyridines have 2 methyls except amlodipine which only has a 6 methyl, substitution of the 2 methyl with CH 2 0CH 2 CH 2 NH 2 interestingly drastically increases the duration of action of this dihydropyridine), deuteration of these groups in any other dihydropyridine would be expected to have the same effect as in nifedipine. EXAMPLE Vm Effect of Deuterated and Control Verapamils on Blood Pressure in Normotensive Sprague-Dawley Rats. Deuteration of verapamil-verapamil hydrochloride was added to a solution of 25 % deuterated sulfuric acid in deuterated water (v/v) and deuterated methanol. The solution was stirred for 140 hours at 90°C. The pH was adjusted to 12.0 and the mixture extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined ethyl acetate extracts were washed 16 SUBSTITUTE SHEET with water, dried over magnesium sulfate and evaporated to yield a viscous oil. This oil was dissolved in ether and ethereal hydrochloride was added to precipitate the hydrochloride salt. The salt was collected by filtration and crystallized from ethyl acetate to obtain deuterated verapamil as a white solid. Control and deuterated verapamils (wherein the aromatic positions of verapamil (a phenylakylamine) were deuterated) were dissolved in minimal volumes of ethanol and diluted until the final concentration of ethanol was less than 0.04% . Doses of the two verapamils as indicated were then injected into pentobarbital-anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 300 and 350 grams. The maximum change in mean arterial pressure, as well as the duration of hypotensive response, were measured directly by means of an intra-arterial catheter. Only one drug dose was given to each rat and a minimum of 60 minutes was allowed for blood pressure to return to baseline. Results are shown below. At each dose, the effect (potency) of deuterated verapamil was less than that of control verapamil (see figure 11). In terms of dose response, using approximately -90 mmHg as the maximum response, the EDj- for control verapamil was 2.89 x 10"* mM and 2.16 x 10 ~3 mM for deuterated verapamil. This difference, among with differences in the entire dose response curves were different by Litchfield-Wilcoxon analysis. Indeed, potency ratio determined by this technique was .133 deuterated vs control (95 % confidence intervals .07 to .25, p < .OO1). Thus, the deuterated verapamil was less potent that control verapamil. In terms of duration of action, however, by Litchfield-Wilcoxon analysis, the deuterated verapamil had a longer duration of action (see figure 12). In addition, the dose-duration curves were also significantly different, giving a potency ratio of 4.95 17 SUBSTITUTE SHEET for deuterated vs control (95% confidence interval 2.3 to 10.7, p< .01). To compare another way, at equipotent doses (0.3 x 10"* mM for control, 0.3 x 10 "3 mM for deuterated; BP reduction -52.8 and -57.0 mmHg respectively), the duration of action for deuterated vs control verapamil was 12.5 vs 6 minutes (p< .01). These results suggest that the potency and duration of action were altered by deuteration. As with the dihydropyridines, duration of action was prolonged by deuteration, but potency, unlike dihydropyridines, was decreased. Depending on the site of deuteration, however, potency could potentially be increased. Thus, in view of the above, (1) duration of action is prolonged by deuteration (for all drugs tested); (2) potency is affected by deuteration: it is increased for dihydropyridines and decreased for verapamil (a phenylalkylamine); and (3) use-dependency is altered for dihydropyridines (it has not been tested for verapamil). Prolonging the Duration of Action of Drugs Using Isotopes. Introduction: Pharmaceutical manufacturers often spend several millions developing drugs that have long durations of activity. The quest for drugs with longer durations of action arises for several reasons including, for example: prolongation of the beneficial therapeutic effect; protection of the drug's market-share by new patents issued for the new drug dosage formulation; and increasing patient compliance (making it easier to take a once-a-day formulation instead of three-, or four-times-a-day formulation). Each of the three drugs tested (i.e., nifedipine, nicardipine, and verapamil) is currently being used in the treatment of hypertension (high blood pressure). As cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in North America, and hypertension is a significant risk factor, it is important that patients requiring these medications have drug concentrations in their circulation which protect them from these 18 SUBSTITUTE SHEET effects of high blood pressure 24 hours a day. Although some manufacturers offer two, three, or four times a day dosing, several are manufacturing drugs which have longer duration of action (longer half lives) by altering the dosage formulation. These dosage formulation alterations include, for example, inclusion of excipients that slow the drug's release, coating of formulations, newer formulations (e.g., osmotic pumps), and coated granules. Many of these modifications of the dosage formulation are extremely expensive to develop and manufacture. Using the deuterated drugs disclosed herein, we have shown that we can modify drugs of different classes (e.g. , 1-4 dihydropyridines and phenylalkylamines) and believe that our modification applies to all drugs, as the principle involved is the same, irrespective of the drug. Without being bound by theory, by deuterating drugs, we have likely produced two effects: increased the lipophilic nature of the molecule and rendered the C-H bond more thermodynamically stable by substituting the -H for -D (deuterium atom). The former point may allow the drug to distribute into more "deeper" tissue depots (such as adipose) and may linger in the body for a longer period of time. The latter point, however, is the point that should be regarded more carefully. By substituting the hydrogen by a deuterium atom, the resulting carbon (C) deuterium (D) bond becomes stronger. Hence, by increasing the mass of hydrogen (H) one atomic mass unit and creating a D, the C-D bonds are probably becoming stronger. This is done using D as a non-radioactive stable isotope of the H. Interestingly, as the C-D bond is thermodynamically more stable than the C-H bond, it is less easily cleaved by metabolic (or destructive) processes. Hence, the elimination half life of the drug is prolonged and the drug's therapeutic effects are increased. Although we have also 19 SUBSTITUTE SHEET observed that there may be changes in the drug's potency, the prolongation of the drug's effect is most striking. In essence, therefore, by simply substituting a H for a D in the three molecules investigated thus far, we have created a new "modified release" drug by way of increasing the duration of the activity. Additionally, a distinct advantage of this method is that this method obviates the need for adding several potentially toxic excipients which are presently included in the modified release formulations. EXAMPLE IX "Fingerprinting" of compounds. Since the substituents of pharmaceutical compounds are usually elements of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, etc., and these elements may exist in more than one isotopic form, the precise nature of these isotopic forms is determined by how and geographically where each chemical is made, particularly since each location where the drug is manufactured usually uses local chemical suppliers for its materials for synthesis. Here, a given pharmaceutical may be developed as a molecule with a very distinct pattern of isotopes present therein. Comparison of the known molecule manufactured by one manufacturer with the molecule of a similar pharmaceutical found in the marketplace can establish whether the second drug was made by the same manufacturer or by another. This is possible since each molecule has a very distinct pattern ("fingerprint") of isotopes. Gas chromatography- isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) can be used to ascertain the materials that are present in a pharmaceutical preparation. Although a generic drug product must pass certain specific tests prior to being approved for the marketplace, it has been determined that such generic drug product consumed by a patient may not have the same quality as that of a drug 20 SUBSTITUTE SHEET manufactured by the innovators of that drug. Differences in quality may be related to impurities or to differences in the chemical make-up of the drug molecule, which differences are not detected using standard testing procedures but are detected by the use of GC-IRMS (described below) for determining the molecular structure of the drug molecule. From the foregoing, it is readily apparent that pharmaceutical preparations which contain identical amounts of a drug may not be bioequivalent. This inequivalency may be entirely due to the isotopic mixture of all of the elements which are included in a particular pharmaceutical. Such isotopic differences between a generic drug and one of a known manufacturer made under the rights of the innovator of that drug could result in inadvertent over- or under-dosing if one formulation is substituted for another. This may mean, for example, that previously well-controlled angina or hypertension may not be controlled upon exchanging one formulation for another, leaving a physician puzzled as to why the drug is no longer rerforming as expected. Conversely, patients who previously experienced no adverse drug effects may begin to develop side effects from the new formulation. In addition, the duration of clinical effect may differ between two different formulations. In accordance with an embodiment of this invention, a new drug appearing on the market and sold as an equivalent of a known drug which has been on the market and made by one manufacturer can be readily analyzed for bioequivalency with the known drug. BASIS OF THE METHOD OF IRMS Isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) is a highly precise method of analysis which is able to measure small samples (low nanogram amounts). For example, 13 C/ 12 C ratios are determined on a mono-carbon molecule; COj gas. Therefore, organic 21 SUBSTITUTE SHEET carbon has to be converted to CO 2 gas by combustion over cuprous oxide (CuO, on-line combustion oven or elemental analyzer) and cryogenically or chromatographically purified. The CO 2 gas can then be immediately directed to the spectrometer by means of a continuous flow IRMS (also called CF-IRMS). The statistical combination of the isotopes of carbon ( 12 C and 13 C) and oxygen ( 16 O, 17 O, 18 O) to generate the CO 2 molecules gives rise to the formation of various isotopomers whose molecular weights are 44, 45, and 46, respectively. Thus, for measuring carbon isotope ratios, three ion beams are generated and recorded in the IRMS, corresponding to the masses of the various isotopomers of CO . .. In order to obtain a high precision and a high accuracy, reference gases of absolutely known isotopic composition are used and a dual inlet system allows an alternative admission of both sample and reference gas into the ionization source via a gas-switching valve. The measurement of the various ion beams allows for the calculation of the 13 C enrichment of the sample. The value of this calculation is given a δ 13 C (%o) notation. The 13 C abundance is expressed as δ 13 C(%o) according to the following: δ 13 C(%o)=([( 13 C/ 12 C) sample/( 13 C/ 12 C)PDB]-1) x 1000 This δ 13 C(%o) value measures the variations in parts per thousand of the carbon isotope ratio from the standard. For carbon, PDB was selected as the international reference. PDB is Pee Dee Belemnitella (a fossil from the Pee Dee geological formation in South Carolina). The 13 C/ 12 C ratio from the calcium carbonate of this fossil is 0.011237. 22 SUBSTITUTE SHEET Compared to PDB, most of the natural compounds display a negative delta value. In the above equation, 13 C/ 12 C refers to the isotopomers. The measurement of the various ion beams for 15 N is given a δ 15 N(%o) notation. The 15 N abundance is expressed as δ 15 N(%o) according to the following equation: δ 15 N(%o) = [( 15 N/ 14 N sample)-( 15 N/ 14 standard)/( 15 N/ 14 N)standard] x 1000 The δ 15 N(%o) value measures the variations in parts per thousand of the nitrogen isotope ratio from the standard. For nitrogen, air was selected as the international reference. The measurement of the various ion beams for 18 O is given a δ 18 O(%o) notation. The 18 O abundance is expressed as δ 18 O(%o) according to the following equation: δ 18 O(%_)= [( 18 O/ 16 O sample)-( 18 O/ 16 O standard)/( 18 O/ 16 O)standard] x 1000 The δ 18 O(%o) value measures the variations in parts per thousand of the oxygen isotope ratio that is, oxygen derived from CO 2 from the standard. For oxygen, CO 2 was selected as the international reference. IRMS INSTRUMENTAL, SETTINGS The isotope ratio mass spectrometer was a Finnigan MAT 252 (Bremen, Germany), equipped with a dual inlet mode and an elemental analyzer for introduction of non-gas samples. Samples were weighed such that each contained approximately 10-20 μg and transferred to tin capsules. The closed tin capsule was housed in the automatic introduction system (elemental analyzer model NA1500 NC, Fisons, UK). Samples were combusted at 1080°C with oxygen and oxidation catalysts (CrO + CuO). The purified CO 2 was analyzed by the continuous flow IRMS. The CO 2 standard was 23 SUBSTITUTE SHEET 13 C Oztech CO 2 (dC(PDB) =-36.49 %. ; dO(PDB) =-25.56 %. ; dO(SMOW)= + 15.06 %o) obtained from Oztech Trading Corporation, Dallas, TX, USA. Other standards run were atropine (C, 70.56%, H, 8.01%; N, 4.84%; O, 16.59%) and phenanthrene (C, 93.556%; H, 5.615%; N, 0.180%; S, 0.456%). The purified nitrogen was analyzed by the continuous flow IRMS. The N standard was 15 N Oztech nitrogen (dN(AIR)=-1.89 %o ; obtained from Oztech Trading Corporation, Dallas, TX, USA. Instrumental settings were: high voltage (HV), 10 kV; cathode, 5.74 A; emission, 1.473 mA; trap emission, 0.937 mA; electron energy, 75.0 -V; trap, 50.1 V. APPLICATION OF ISOTOPE RATIO MASS SPECTROMETRY FOR FINGERPRINTING: A number of pharmaceuticals, including nifedipine, ciprofloxacin, ketoprofen, zopiclone and acebutolol have been investigated using an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) for the determination of source of manufacture. This method for producing a "fingerprint" is based, for example, on ratios of 13 C/ 12 C which are determined from CO 2 gas; oxygen and nitrogen isotope ratios can also be used for "fingerprinting". The organic carbon in the pharmaceutical is converted to CO 2 by combustion over cuprous oxide and purified cryogenically or chromatographically. The resulting CO 2 is transferred directly to the spectrometer by continuous flow via a transfer line to the IRMS. In order to maintain a high degree of precision for the measurement of the isotopes of CO 2 , a reference gas of absolutely known isotopic composition is admitted to the IRMS through a dual inlet system which enables the alternate input of both a sample gas (from the pharmaceutical) and a reference gas. The analysis generates a 13 C/ 12 C ratio (δ %o) which is expressed as follows: 24 SUBSTITUTE SHEET δ %o = ((R 1 ^ι e -R ΛM ^ R Λaι< u ri ) x 1000 This δ Ψoo (delta per mil) value measures the variations in parts per thousands of the carbon isotope ratio from the . standard. It is this value which is used in the fingerprinting of pharmaceuticals. Raw materials (active ingredients) as well as finished products (e.g., tablets) were analyzed. The results for the pharmaceuticals which have been processed are as follows: 25 SUBSTITUTE SHEET I.R.M.S. RESULTS FOR RAW MATERIALS AND E_NISHED PRODUCTS FINGERPRINTING MOLECULE NAME/BATCH ξ MEAN) STD. RAW' DEVIATION MATERIAL OR FINISHED PRODUCT Acebutolol ABC-191-MP -30.67 0.10 RM Acebutolol 4435910222 -28.84 0.08 RM Acebutolol J57 -30.65 0.06 RM Zopiclone M-23078 -30.42 0.05 RM 9321500 RPR Zopiclone M-23149 -33.93 0.04 RM 9332900 RPR Zopiclone M-23077 -31.43 0.08 RM 9322900 Zopiclone 62H4023 -33.20 0.05 RM Nifedipine OEHS SA -26.67 0.10 RM Sanofi Nifedipine 39163032 -32.07 0.04 RM Nifedipine 1838H8 -29.41 0.11 RM Siegfried Nifedipine 7113-Sumika -39.69 0.03 RM Nifedipine 038-1016B- -30.35 0.14 RM Seioc AG Nifedipine NF-19010 -35.92 0.07 RM Quimicha Aimar Nifedipine C.F.M. -19.61 0.07 RM Milanese Nifedipine 795019 -36.67 0.24 RM Nifedipine PT240563H -30.03 0.15 RM .Bayer AG Nifedipine PT257982A -30.50 0.10 RM Bayer AG Nifedipine PT257981B -30.59 0.09 RM 1 Baver AG Nifedipine PT249877D -31.17 0.15 RM Baver AG 26 SUBSTITUTE SHEET Nifedipine PT257980D -30.66 0.09 RM Bayer AG Nifedipine 898556A -30.09 0.13 RM Bayer AG Nifedipine 899612A -30.51 0.09 RM Bayer AG Nifedipine 898552S -30.45 0.13 RM Bayer AG Nifedipine 898553K -30.32 0.10 RM Bayer AG Nifedipine 898555C -30.21 0.14 RM Bayer AG Nifedipine 2704 -29.67 0.08 RM Dexxon Israel Nifedipine NI-S-891101 -34.33 0.06 RM China Nifedipine 50-OEHS SA -28.75 0.08 RM Sanofi Nifedipine 038.1016B -30.05 0.20 RM Seloc AG Switzerland Nifedipine 150 -28.40 0.05 RM Cipla Bombay Nifedipine 208143 -35.67 0.21 RM Sumika Japan Nifedipine K8192400 -28.14 0.14 RM Klinge Pharma GMBh Germany Nifedipine 5486 -33.46 0.15 RM MI/01102 Zambon Group Italy Ciprofloxacin 43/93 -34.62 0.09 RM Union Quimico Farmaceutia, Spain Ciprofloxacin 92/18 Fako, -35.84 0.07 RM • Istanbul Ciproflbxacin 930501, -30.02 0.17 RM Shanghai 27 SUBSTITUTE SHEET **only two determinations were made. Mention of a standard deviation, therefore, was ot appropriate. 28 SUBSTITUTE SHEET The above information confirms that IRMS can be used to "fingerprint" pharmaceuticals from various sources of manufacture. Such information can be used to source pharmaceuticals, whether as raw materials (active ingredients) or as finished product. Figure 13 shows a three dimensional "fingerprint" of seven nifedipine preparations. All of these preparations are significantly different from each other. This type of three dimensional "fingerprint" is what would be typically done to provide the most sensitive "fingerprint" of a drug or any other substance. Figure 14 shows a two dimensional "fingerprint" of nine nifedipine preparations. The error lines are 95 % confidence intervals; thus, all of the preparations are significantly different from each other. Although three dimensional "fingerprinting" gives a more precise "fingerprint", in practice two dimensional "fingerprinting" is usually sufficient to differentiate materials. Figure 15 shows a two dimensional (oxygen vs. carbon) "fingerprint" of solatol crude tablets. Most of the tablets can be differentiated from each other by the two dimensional technique though carbon-oxygen two dimensional "fingerprinting" is less precise than carbon-nitrogen "fingerprinting". Figure 16 shows "fingerprints" of three different hair samples from three different people. In the case of the first patient (pt.l), a second sample was obtained one week later and compared with the first. This comparison gave a statistically identical value to the first sample, thus showing that this technique is reproducible and can be used to identify hair samples. 29 SUBSTITUTE SHEET Figure 17 shows a two dimensional carbon-oxygen "fingerprint" of three liquors. Though two of the liquors are of the same brand, "fingerprinting" can differentiate them according to country of origin. Further variations and modifications of the foregoing will be apparent to those skilled in the art and such variations and modifications are attended to be encompassed by the claims that are appended hereto. 30 SUBSTITUTE SHEET

Claims: What is claimed: 1. A compound wherein at least one of the hydrogen atoms is replaced with a deuterium atom or wherein at least one carbon, nitrogen or oxygen is replaced with a different isotope. 2. The compound according to claim 1, wherein said compound is a dihydropyridine. 3. The compound according to claim 2, wherein said dihydropyridine is deuterated nifedipine having the formula wherein at least one of the hydrogen atoms is a deuterium atom. 4. The compound according to claim 3, wherein at least one of the methyl groups of said deuterated nifedipine is CD 3 . 5. The compound according to claim 2, wherein at least one of the methyl groups attached to positions 2 and 6 of the dihydropyridine ring is substituted with CD 3 . 31 SUBSTITUTE SHEET 6. The compound according to claim 5, wherein said deuterated dihydropyridine is deuterated nifedipine having the formula 7. The compound according to claim 2, wherein said dihydropyridine is nifedipine,, nicardipine, nimodipine, niludipine, nisoldipine, nitrendipine, felodipine, ifradipine or amlodipine. 8. A method for making the deuterated dihydropyridine of claim 2, said method comprising: dissolving a dihydropyridine in a mixture of deuterochloroform and deuterium oxide to form a solution, adding trifluoroacetic anhydride and deuteroacetone to said solution, freezing and sealing said solution within a vessel, heating said solution at a temperature and for a period of time sufficient to deuterate all of the hydrogen atoms at the 2 and 6 position on said dihydropyridine, and recovering said deuterized dihydropyridine. 9. The method according to claim 8, wherein said deuterized dihydropyridine is deuterated nifedipine and said method comprises: 32 SUBSTITUTE SHEET dissolving nifedipine in a mixture of deuterochloroform and deuterium oxide to form a solution, adding trifluoroacetic anhydride and deuteroacetone to said solution, freezing and sealing said solution within a vessel, heating said solution at a temperature and for a period of time sufficient to deuterate all of the hydrogen atoms at the 2 and 6 position on said nifedipine, and recovering said deuterized nifedipine. 10. The method according to claim 9, said method comprising: dissolving 80 mg of nifedipine in a mixture of about 2 ml of deuterochloroform and about 0.5 ml of deuterium oxide to form a solution, adding about 0.2 ml of trifluoroacetic anhydride and 2 ml of deuteroacetone to said solution and mixing therewith, freezing and sealing said solution within a vessel, heating said solution at a temperature of about 50° to about 65 °C for a period of time of about 150 to 180 hours, cooling said heated solution and recovering said deuterated nifedipine. 11. The method as defined in claim 10 wherein said temperature is about 55° to about 60°C. 12. The method as defined in claim 10 wherein said period of time is from about 160 to 170 hours. 33 SUBSTITUTE SHEET 13. The method as defined in claim 10 wherein said temperature is about 57 °C and said period of time is about 168 hours. 14. A method for the treatment of hypertension in an animal suffering therefrom comprising administering to said animal a therapeutically effective amount of the deuterated nifedipine of the formula set forth in claim 2 or 5. 15. A method of detecting whether a pharmaceutical compound is identical and/or bioequivalent to a known pharmaceutical compound comprising the steps of (a) determining the molecular and isotopic structure of said known pharmaceutical compound by gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry, (b) determining the molecular and isotopic structure of said pharmaceutical compound subject to said detection by gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry, (c) comparing the results of said two determinations to detect any isotope variation in the molecular structure of said pharmaceutical compound over that of the known pharmaceutical compound. 16. The use of the deuterated nifedipine of the formula set forth in claim 2 or 5, as an antihypertensive drug. 17. The use of the deuterated nifedipine of the formula set forth in claim 2 or 5, for preparing an antihypertensive 34 SUBSTITUTE SHEET medicament. 35 SUBSTITUTE SHEET

Inventors: CAILLE GILLES, FOSTER ROBERT R, LEWANCZUK RICHARD, CAILLE, GILLES, FOSTER, ROBERT, R., LEWANCZUK, RICHARD
Applicants: ISOTECHNIKA INC, ISOTECHNIKA INC.
Application year: 1995
Main classification: C07B59
IPC codes: A61K31, A61P9, C07B59, C07C233, C07D211, C07D215, C07D487, G01N33