A METHOD FOR DIRECT CLONING OF NUCLEASE GENES IN E. COLI

Abstract: The present invention discloses a novel method for the direct cloning of nuclease genes such as restriction endonuclease genes in E. coli. In addition, there is provided a novel strain which facilitates application of the method. This method has been successfully employed to clone a number of genes coding for endonuclease including restriction endonuclease genes.

Description: A METHOD FOR DIRECT CLONING OF NUCLEASE GENES IN E. COLI BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Nucleases are a class of enzymes which degrade or cut single- or double- stranded DNA. Restriction endonucleases are an important class of nucleases which recognize and bind to particular sequences of nucleotides (the 'recognition sequence') along the DNA molecule. Once bound, they cleave both strands of the molecule within, or to one side of, the recognition sequence. Different restriction endonucleases recognize different recognition sequences. Over one hundred and eighty restriction endonucleases with unique specificities have been identified among the many hundreds of bacterial species that have been examined to date. It is thought that in nature, restriction endonucleases play a protective role in the welfare of the bacterial cell. They enable bacteria to resist infection by foreign DNA molecules like viruses and plasmids that would otherwise destroy or parasitize them. They impart resistance by cleaving invading foreign DNA molecules when the appropriate recognition sequence is present. The cleavage that takes place disables many of the infecting genes and renders the DNA susceptible to further degradation by non-specific endonucleases. A second component of these bacterial protective systems are the modification methylases. These enzymes are complementary to the restriction endonucleases and they provide the means by which bacteria are able to protect their own DNA from cleavage and distinguish it from foreign, infecting DNA. Modification methylases recognize and bind to the same nucleotide recognition sequence as the corresponding restriction endonuclease, but instead of cleaving the DNA, they chemically modify one or other of the nucleotides within the sequence by the addition of a methyl group. Following methylation, the recognition sequence is no longer bound or cleaved by the restriction endonuclease. The DNA of a bacterial cell is always fully modified by virtue of the activity of the modification methylase. It is therefore completely insensitive to the presence of the endogenous restriction endonuclease. It is only unmodified, and therefore identifiably foreign DNA, that is sensitive to restriction endonuclease recognition and cleavage. With the advent of genetic engineering technology, it is now possible to clone genes and to produce the proteins and enzymes that they encode in greater quantities than are obtainable by conventional purification techniques. The key to isolating clones of restriction endonuclease genes is to develop a simple and reliable method to identify such clones within complex 'libraries', i.e. populations of clones derived by 'shotgun' procedures, when they occur at frequencies as low as 10"3 to 10" 4 . Type II restriction-modification systems are being cloned with increasing frequency. The first cloned systems used bacteriophage infection as a means of identifying or selecting restriction endonuclease clones (Eco Rll: Kosykh et al., Molec. Gen. Genet. 178:717-719, (1980); Hha II: Mann et al., Gene 3:97-112, (1978); Pst I Walder er a/., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 78:1503- 1507, (1981 )). Since the presence of restriction-modification systems in bacteria enables them to resist infection by bacteriophages, cells that carry cloned restriction-modification genes can, in principle, be selectively isolated as survivors from libraries that have been exposed to phage. This method has been found, however, to have only limited value. Specifically, it has been found that cloned restriction-modification genes do not always manifest sufficient phage resistance to confer selective survival. Another cloning approach involves transferring systems initially characterized as plasmid-borne into E. coli cloning plasmids (Eco RV: Bougueleret et al., Nucl. Acid. Res. 12: 3659-3676, (1984); Pae R7: Gingeras and Brooks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:402-406, (1983); Theriault and Roy, Gene 19:355-359 (1982); Pvu II: Blumenthal et al., J. Bacteriol. 164:501-509, (1985)). A third approach, and one that is being used to clone a growing number of systems are now being cloned by selection for an active methylase gene. See, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 5,200,333, and Bsu Rl: Kiss et al., Nucl. Acid. Res. 13: 6403-6421 , (1985)). Since restriction and modification genes are often closely linked, both genes can often be cloned simultaneously. This selection does not always yield a complete restriction system however, but instead yields only the methylase gene (Bsp Rl: Szomolanyi et al., Gene 10: 219-225, (1980); Ben I: Janulaitis et al., Gene 20: 197-204 (1982); Bsu R : Kiss and Baldauf, Gene 21 : 111-119, (1983); and Msp I: Walder etai, J. Biol. Chem. 258:1235-1241 , (1983)). A fourth cloning method (the "methylase indicator" method) relies on methylation-dependent restriction systems McrA, McrBC, and Mrr (Raleigh and Wilson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 83: 9070-9074, (1986), Heitman and Model, Gene 103:1-9; Kelleher and Raleigh, J. Bacteriol. 173:5220-5223, (1991 )) and the dinD1 ::lacZ operon fusion to screen for clones that contain methylase genes. The dinD1 locus is a DNA damage inducible gene that is expressed in E. coll when the "SOS response" is triggered, as by UV treatment, mitomycin treatment, or the action of McrA, McrBC, or Mrr restriction endonucleases on methylated DNA (Kenyon and Walker, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 77:2819-2823, (1980), Heitman and Model, Gene, 103:1-9, (1991); Heitman and Model, J. Bacteriol. 169:3234-3250, (1989); and Piekarowicz et al. J. Bacteriol. 173:150-155, (1991 ), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference). Strains with temperature sensitive mutations in mcrA, mcrBC, mrr and carrying the dinD1::lacZ fusion were constructed and used for the direct cloning of methylase genes into E. coli from other bacterial sources (Piekarowicz et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 19:1831-1835, (1991 ), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference). Upon transformation of ligated genomic/vector DNA into such strain, transformants containing a gene expressing a methylase that confers sensitivity to one of the methylation-dependent restriction systems form white colonies at 42°C and blue colonies at 30°C on X-gal indicator plates as a result of methylation-dependent restriction that results in SOS DNA repair induction and β-galactosidase expression. Because of close linkage between most restriction enzyme genes and the cognate methylase genes, cloning of a methylase gene in a DNA fragment of reasonable size may lead to concomitant cloning of the cognate endonuclease gene. It would be desirable to design a method for the direct cloning of nucleases, such as restriction endonucleases, as an alternative method when standard approaches are either impractical or fail to yield positive results. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a novel method for the direct cloning of nuclease genes such as restriction endonuclease genes in E. coli. In addition, there is provided a novel strain which facilitates application of the above method. This method has been successfully employed to clone a number of genes coding for nucleases including restriction endonuclease genes such as SsoBI, T-VYI H I, Taql, and Eco0191. Accordingly, there is also provided isolated DNA which encodes such nucleases, as well as vectors and transformed host cells for expressing these nucleases. More specifically, the present invention relates to (i) a new E. coli strain containing the dinD1 :lacZ fusion, which strain is deficient in all restriction systems (EcoKR " , McrA", McrBC", Mrr), (ii) a method for direct cloning of nuclease genes in E. coli using a strain which contains a fusion of a DNA damage-inducing promoter and an indicator/reporter gene such as the dinDV.JacZ fusion, and (iii) isolated DNA coding for certain nucleases cloned by this method. As it has been shown that DNA breaks or nicks introduced by the T7.3 endonuclease, Eco Rl, or Bam HI restriction enzymes induce the SOS response in E. coli. (Panayotatos and Fontaine, J. Biol. Chem. 260:3173-3177, (1985), Heitman and Model, Gene, 103:1-9, (1991 ), Xu and Schildkraut, J. Biol. Chem. 266:4425-4429, (1991 )), the present inventors reasoned that when ligated genomic DNA fragments and vector are introduced into an indicator strain such as dinD1::lacZ deficient in all restriction systems so far described and transformants plated on X-gal plates, one might find the nucleases-containing clone directly by picking blue colonies. When used to clone genes coding for a restriction endonuclease, unlike the methylase selection approach, it is not necessary that the methylase gene fully protect the host chromosome. In fact, the methylase gene may be absent altogether. This is particularly true for thermostable enzymes where, in accordance with the present invention, the transformants are grown at lower temperatures, i.e., between about 30°- 37°C. At this lower temperature, thermostable restriction endonucleases are less active, and transformed host cells may survive with partial or even without protective methylation. In other words, in accordance with the method of the present invention, when host cells such as the preferred E. coli cells (dinD1 v.lacZ , EcoKR " , McrA " , McrBC", Mrr) are transformed with ligated genomic/vector DNA and transformants are plated on X-gal plates, cells carrying the restriction endonuclease gene form blue colonies because the restriction enzyme damages DNA in vivo and induces the SOS DNA repair response. This method (the "endonuclease indicator method") differs from the "methylase indicator method", Piekarowicz et al., supra, in that the earlier method detected expression of the methylase, not the endonuclease. That method relied on the DNA-damaging action of endogenous restriction enzymes (McrA, McrBC or Mrr) that act on specific methylated sequences. Expression of an appropriate foreign methylase can create a sequence susceptible to one or more of these methylation-specific endonucleases, leading to SOS-induction and blue color. The gene for the cognate endonuclease might or might not accompany the methylase gene. The endonuclease indicator method of the present invention detects the endonuclease only and not the methylase, because the relevant methylation-dependent restriction systems are absent from the host. The genes coding for the thermostable restriction enzymes Taq\ (5TCGA3' (SEQ ID NO:1)) and Tf 71111 (5'GACNNNGTC3' (SEQ ID NO:2)) have been successfully cloned in E. coli by this method. The methylase selection method (Szomolanyi et al. Gene 10: 219-225, (1980) and the "endonuclease indicator method" can also be combined to clone restriction endonuclease genes. The gene coding for the restriction endonuclease ecoO109IR has been cloned by combining these two methods. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES Figure 1 is a scheme for the cloning oH t hH HR gene, the gene coding for Tthl 111, in E. coli. Figure 2 shows the DNA cleavage pattern produced by cloned Taq\ and Tthλ 111 restriction enzymes produced in E. coli. Figure 3 shows SsoBI activity assay. One μg of lambda DNA substrate was incubated with 10 μl of cell extract at 65°C for one hour in buffer containing 50mM NaCI, 10 mM Tris-HCI, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT. The digested DNA products were resolved in an 0.8% agarose gel and detected by ethidium bromide staining. The cell extract from isolate #16 was found to contain SsoBI endonuclease activity. First lane: SsoBI positive control. The number above each lane indicates isolate number. Figure 4-1 through Figure 4-4 is the sequence of the βsoBI restriction and methylase genes (SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:5 and SEQ ID NO:6). Figure 5 is a restriction map of the DNA insert containing the SsoBI restriction endonuclease gene. The insert size is approximately 8.0 kb. The insert was derived from Sau3AI partially-digested Bacillus stearothermophilus genomic DNA and cloned into the BamH\ site of pUC19. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, there is provided a novel method for the direct cloning of nuclease genes. In general, the method comprises the following steps, although as the skilled artisan will appreciate, modifications to these steps may be made without adversely affecting the outcome: 1 ) Genomic DNA is prepared from the nuclease producing strain and cleaved completely or partially to generate about 500 bp - 20,000 bp clonable DNA fragments. These fragments may be obtained, for example, with restriction enzymes or sheared by sonication. The fragments so obtained are thereafter ligated to cloning vectors with compatible cohesive ends or blunt ends in pBR322, pUC19, pACYC187, pSC101 , or their derivatives. 2) The ligated DNA mixture is transferred into a bacterial strain which contains a DNA damage-producing promoter fused to an indicator/reporter such as the preferred dinDv.lacZ fusion and which is deficient in methylation-dependent restriction systems (dinDv.lacZ , hsdR, mcrA, mcrBC, mrr). One preferred strain is E. coli ER1992 (NEB #907), a sample of which has been deposited at the American Type Culture Collection under the terms of the Budapest Treaty on May 24, 1994, ATCC Accession No. 55582. Other DNA damage-inducing promoters which can be used include dinA (Iwasaki, M., et al., J. Bacteriol . , 172:6268-6273 (1990) and dinG (Lewis, L.K., J. Bacteriol. 174:5110-5116 (1992), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Other ' indicator/reporter genes which can be fused to any of the above promoters include alkaline phosphatase (phoA) (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82:5107- 5111 (1985), luciferase (lux) (Engelrecht, J., Science , 227:1345-1347 (1985), β-glucuronidase (Metcalfe, W.W., Gene , 129:17-25 (1993), aminoglycoside phosphotransferase (Ward, J.M., et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. , 203:468-478 (1986), and endoglucanase (Bingle, W.W., et al., Can. J. Microbiol. , 39:70-80 (1993), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. After transformation into E. coli ER1992, the cells are plated on indicator plates containing X-gal and appropriate antibiotics and incubated overnight at about 30°C to 42°C. Sometimes none of or not all of the methylation-dependent restriction systems of the host have to be inactivated depending on the particular restriction endonuclease gene or nuclease genes to be cloned. While total deficiency in these systems is not required, it is preferable to use the dinDv.lacZ strains deficient in all the methylation- dependent systems to clone a restriction-modification system if one does not know the modified bases (unusually C 5 cytosine, N 4 cytosine, or N^ adenine). 3) Individual medium/dark blue colonies are picked and inoculated into LB media (10 ml to 1000 ml) plus the appropriate antibiotics and shaken overnight at about 30°C to 42°C. 4) Cells are harvested by centrifugation, resuspendt J in sonication buffer plus lysozyme and cell lysis is completed by sonication. Cell debris and insoluble components are removed by centrifugation. 5) If the nuclease gene to be cloned is from a thermostable bacterium, the lysate is heated at about 65°C for a period of time (for example 30 min) sufficient to denature E. coli native proteins. This step efficiently inactivates native E. coli nucleases. 6) The supernatant (cell extract) is assayed for nuclease activity on appropriate DNA substrates such as pUC19, pBR322, M13mp18/19 ' replicative form or single-stranded DNA or λ DNA at 37°C to 68°C in an appropriate buffer. 7) DNA digestion patterns or fragments are resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis or PAGE and detected by ethidium bromide staining. The above-described method has been successfully used to clone a number of nuclease genes including the taqlR gene, the 11 hi 17IR gene, as well as the gene coding for the DNA nuclease from Thermus filiformis. As noted above, this method particularly lends itself to the cloning of other nucleases including thermostable nucleases such as BsoB I from Bacillus stearothermophilus (NEB #882). BsoB I is an isoschizomer of Ava I which recognizes CPyCGPuG (SEQ ID NO:7). In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a novel strain which can be used in the above-described endonuclease indicator method. This strain, E. coli ER1992, contains the dinDv.lacZ fusion and is deficient in all restriction systems (EcoKR " , McrA " , McrBC " and Mrr " ). E. coli ER1992 (f λ' Δ(argF-lac)U169 supE44 e14' dinD1 v.M dl1734 (Kan R , LacZ+) rfbD1 ? relA1 ? endA1 spoT1? thi-1 Δ(mcrC- mrr)114::IS10) was constructed in three steps: (i) A Lac" derivative of ER1821 was obtained by transduction with a proC::Tn5 linked to Δ(argF- lac)U169 from NK6993, selecting for Kan R and screening for Lac " Pro" to yield ER1984; (ii) this derivative was made Pro + Kan s by transduction from ER1578, yielding ER1991 ; (iii) dinDV.Mu dl1734(Kan R , LacZ+) was introduced by transduction from JH140, (an E. coli strain which is dinD1 ::Mu dl1734 (Kan R , LacZ+) (J. Heitman, et al., Gene 103:1-9 (1991)) selecting Kan R and screening for nalidixic acid-inducible expression of β- galactosidase mediated by the dinD fusion. This was tested on X-gal plates with a central well containing this DNA-damaging agent. Purified transductants were streaked radially from the well. One that yielded a gradient of dark blue color was designated E. coli ER1992. This strain showed light blue color on X-gal in the absence of any DNA damage. The following examples are given to illustrate embodiments of the present invention as it is presently preferred to practice. It will be understood that these examples are illustrative, and that the invention is not to be considered as restricted thereto except as indicated in the appended claims. EXAMPLE 1 CLONING OF THE bsoBlR GENE CODING FROM THE BsoB I RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE IN E. coli Bacterial DNA purification: Five grams of Bacillus stearothermophilus (NEB#882) cells were resuspended in 25 ml of buffer containing 25% sucrose, 50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 8.0. Five ml of 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0, and 6 ml of lysozyme (10 mg/ml) were added to the cell suspension. After 10 min incubation at room temperature, 36 ml of lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 8.0, 62 mM EDTA) and 5 ml of 10% SDS were added to completely lyse the cells. Proteins were removed by phenol-CHCl3 extraction twice and CHCI3 extraction twice. Genomic DNA was precipitated by addition of 1/10 volume of 3.5 M sodium acetate and equal volume of isopropanol and centrifugation at 15,000 rpm/min. The DNA pellet was washed with 50 ml of 70% ethanol and dried under vacuum. The DNA pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of TE buffer and dialysed in 2 liters of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA) overnight at 4°C. Partial digestion of genomic DNA: Fifty μg of genomic DNA was digested with 2 units, 1 unit, 0.5 unit, 0.25 unit, 0.125 unit of Sau3A\ respectively at 37°C for 30 min. The digested DNA was purified by phenol-CHCl3 extraction twice and CHCI3 extraction twice and ethanol precipitation. Vector pUC19 DNA was linearized by SamHI restriction enzyme and dephophorylated by calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIP). After CIP treatment, the vector DNA was purified by phenol-CHCl3 extraction twice and CHCI3 extraction twice and ethanol precipitation. Ligation and transformation: Ten μg of Sau3A\ partially digested genomic DNA was ligated with 1 μg βa HI-cleaved and CIP-treated pUC19 DNA at 16°C overnight. The ligated DNA was diluted with addition of equal volume of TE buffer and used to transform ER1992 (diπD1v.lacZ + , hsdR, mcrA, mcrBC, mrή competent cells. Transformants were plated on Ampicillin (Ap) plus X-gal plates (5-bromo-4-chloro-3- indolyl-D-galactopyranoside, X-gal, 0.016% weight/vol.) and incubated at 37°C overnight. Twenty-four blue colonies were found among 10,000 transformants and each blue colony inoculated into 10 ml LB plus Ap and incubated overnight at 37°C in a shaker. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 1 ml of sonication buffer (10 mM Tris- HCI, pH 7.8, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 10 mg/ml lysozyme). Cell lysis was completed by sonication twice, each time for 30 seconds. Insoluble components were removed by centrifugation and the supernatant was collected and used for endonuclease activity assay as follows: 1 μg of lambda DNA substrate was incubated with 10 μl of cell extract at 65°C for one hour in a buffer containing 50 mM NaCI, 10 mM Tris-HCI, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT. DNA fragments were resolved in an 0.8% agarose gel and detected by ethidium bromide staining. The cell extract from one isolate was found to contain SsoBI endonuclease activity (see Figure 3, isolate #16). Plasmid DNA was extracted from this strain and digested with SsoBI restriction endonuclease to check resistance. The plasmid DNA was cleaved by SsoBI, indicating that either the SsoBI methylase gene is not present in the insert or the methylase gene is not expressed at all. The plasmid carrying the SsoBI endonuclease gene (BsoBIR) was named pSsofll . To determine the stability of SsoBI clone, ER1992 [pSso 71] cells were grown at 37°C and plasmid DNA was isolated from the cells and used to retransform into ER1992 competent cells. In the retransformation experiment, transformants were plated at 30°C to minimize further mutations. It was found that 67% transformants form blue colonies (356 blue colonies out of 528 transformants), while the other 33% form white colonies (172 white colonies out of 528 transformants). When plasmid DNA was isolated from the white colonies and analyzed by restriction digestion, it was found that the DNA showed extensive deletions. It was concluded that ER1992 [pSsσfll] cells are not very stable at 37°C. ER1992 [pSso/H] cells are more stable when the blue colony carrying pSso/TI was incubated overnight at 30°C instead of 37°C. When plasmid DNA isolated from the 30°C culture was used for the retransformation, 99.6% of the transformants form blue colonies at 30°C (480 blue colonies, 2 white colonies). A sample of pSsoRI (NEB#951 ) has been deposited under the terms of the Budapest Treaty at the American Type Culture Collection on December 13, 1994, and received ATCC Accession No. 75966. The genes coding for the Aval restriction-modification system has been cloned at New England Biolabs. Ava\ and SsoBI share the same recognition sequence 5'CPyCGPuG3'(SEQ ID NO:7). A 1.8 kb Psti fragment carrying the Ava\ methylase gene (avalM) was digested from pAva\RM\2 and cloned into the pR976 vector (a pACYC184 derivative, Tc R ). The plasmid pR976->4valM + was transformed into ER1992 (dinDv.lacZ) cells to premodify the E. coli chromosome. A second plasmid, pSso ?1 , carrying the SsoBI endonuclease gene, was then introduced into the cells containing pR976->4valM + and plated on X-gal indicator plate. It was found that the transformants still form blue colonies, indicating the Aval methylase does not protect E.coli chromosome against SsoBI endonuclease damage. Plasmid mini-preparation procedure: 1.5 ml overnight culture was pelleted for 3 minutes at 14,000 rpm/min. The supernatant was poured off and the cell pellet was resuspended in 200 ml STET buffer (50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.8, 50 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton-X100, 8% sucrose). 50 μl of lysozyme (10 mg/ml) was added to the cell suspension. The lysed cells were boiled for 1 min in boiling water and the precipitate was spun down at 14,000 rpm/min., for 10 minutes. 200 μl supemantant was collected and mixed with 100 μl 7.5 M NH3AC and 600 ml 95% ethanol. DNA was precipitated by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm/min. for 10 minutes at room temperature. The DNA pellet was washed with 1 ml of 70% ethanol, and dried for 15 minutes under vacuum. Once dry, the pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of TE buffer plus 5 μl of RNaseA (10 mg/ml). Restriction mapping of the insert: The plasmid DNA pBsoRI was digested with various restriction enzymes and the digested DNA products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The restriction map was shown in Figure 5. The DSOBIR gene was mapped to within a 1.4 kb EcoNI/Xbal fragment in the 8 kb genomic DNA insert by deleting mapping. The entire fcsoBIR gene was sequenced from subclones and deletion clones (Sspl fragment subclone, Avή /Xba subclone, Malll fragment subclone, Sau3Al fragment subclone, subclone, Avή /Xhol) and "primer walking." The start codon of the bsoBIR gene was assigned to a TTG codon because the N-terminal protein sequence of the purified SsoBI endonuclease matches with the predicted protein sequence following this start codon ((M) NTQKPFENHLKSVDDL (which corresponds to amino acids 1-17 of SEQ ID NO:6)). The DNA on both sides of the bsoBIR gene was also sequenced to determine the existence of part of the cytosine methylase gene if any that has been cloned in the 8.0 kb DNA fragment. The bsoBIM gene or part of the bsoBIM gene could be identified based on the conserved methylase motifs. When the DNA region following the bsoBIR gene was sequenced and translated on all six frames, one conserved N4 cytosine methylase motif was found. This sequence is DPFLGSGTT (which corresponds to amino acids 106-114 of SEQ ID NO:5). Only 727 bp of the bsoBIM gene was present on the original 8.0 kb insert. Therefore inverse PCR was used to clone the remaining part of the methylase gene. Cloning and sequencing of the inverse PCR products of Hae l and Nlalll cleaved/self-iigated genomic DNA yielded another 902 bp of the methylase gene in which another conserved methylase motif TSPPY (which corresponds to amino acids 319-323 of SEQ ID NO:5) was found. The entire methylase gene (1629 bp) was amplified by lac R from genomic DNA and cloned into pSX33laclQ and tranformed into E. coli RR1 competent cells to premodify the host. A Bbsl/Xbal fragment containing the bsoBIR gene was cloned into an expression vector pRRS to yield the overproducing construct E. coli RR1 (pSX33laclQ-SsoBIM+, pRRS-SsoBIR+). The sequence of the bsoBIM and bsoBIR genes are illustrated in Figures 4-1 through 4-4, respectively. EXAMPLE 2 CLONING OF TAPIR GENE IN E. COLI Bacterial DNA purification was done as follows: Five grams of Thermus aquaticus YT-1 (ATCC 25104) cells were resuspended in 25 ml of buffer containing 25% sucrose, 50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 8.0. Five ml of 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0, and 6 ml of lysozyme (10 mg/ml) were added to the cell suspension. After 10 min incubation at room temperature, 36 ml of lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 8.0, 62 mM EDTA) and 5 ml of 10% SDS were added to completely lyse the cells. Proteins were removed by phenol-CHCl3 extraction twice and CHCI3 extraction twice and genomic DNA was precipitated by addition of 1/10 volume of 3.5 M sodium acetate and equal volume of isopropanol and centrifugation at 15,000 rpm/min. The DNA pellet was washed with 50 ml of 70% ethanol and dried under vacuum. The DNA was resuspended in 10 ml of TE buffer and dialysed in 2 liters of TE buffer onvernight at 4°C. Fifty μg of genomic DNA was digested with 1 unit, 0.5 unit, 0.25 unit, 0.125 unit of Sa-i3AI at 37°C for 30 min. The digested DNA was purified by phenol-CHCl3 extraction twice and CHCI3 extraction twice and ethanol precipitation. Vector pBR322 DNA was linearized by SamHI restriction enzyme and dephophorylated by calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIP). The vector DNA was purified again by phenol-CHCl3 extraction twice and CHCI3 extraction twice and ethanol precipitation. The Sau 3AI partially digested genomic DNA was ligated with SamHI- cleaved and CIP-treated pBR322 DNA. A total of approximately 4,000 colonies were obtained from one transformation experiment by mixing E. coli ER1992 (dinDlv.lacZ , hsdR, mcrA, mcrBC, mrr) competent cells and the ligated DNA and transformants are plated on Ap plus X-gal plates. Ten blue colonies were found and each inoculated into 10 ml LB plus Ap and incubated overnight at 37°C in a shaker. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 1 ml of sonication buffer (10 mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.8, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol) plus lysozyme (10 mg/ml). Cell lysis was completed by sonication. E. coli proteins were heat-denatured by incubation of lysate at 65°C for 30 min. Insoluble components were removed by centrifugation and the supernatant was used for endonuclease activity assay, λ or pBR322 DNA substrates were incubated with 5 μl of cell extract at 65°C for one hour. DNA fragments were resolved in 0.8% agarose gels and detected by ethidium bromide staining. When cell extracts were examined for endonuclease activity on pBR322 substrate, two strains were found to makeTaq. endonuclease (Figure 2). Plasmid DNA was extracted from these two strains and subjected XoTaql endonuclease digestion. One plasmid was partially resistant to Taq digestion and the other was completely digested. It was inferred from the above result that one clone contains Taq\ methylase gene and the second clone may not. To estimate Taql endonuclease yield one liter cell culture was made at 37°C and cell extract assayed for activity. Both strains make about 5 x 10 4 units of Taq I per gram of wet cells. Cell extract was prepared as follows: 1 liter of LB plus Ap was inoculated with 5 ml of overnight cells and shaken at 37°C overnight. The cells were centrifuged and cell pellet resuspended in 20 ml sonication buffer (10 mM Tris-HCI, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol), sonicated for ten times at 30 seconds burst, centrifuged at 15,000 rpm/min. for 30 minutes to remove cell debris. The supernatant was assayed for endonuclease activity in the Taql buffer (100 mM NaCI, 10 mM Tris-HCI, 10 mM MgCl2) at 65°C for 1 hour. EXAMPLE 3 CLONING OF TTH111IR GENE Genomic DNA was prepared from Thermus thermophilus 111 (NEB # 249) strain which produces 7Ϊ .1111 restriction enzyme. Five grams of cells were resuspended in 25 ml of buffer containing 25% sucrose, 50 mM Tris- HCI, pH 8.0. Five ml of 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0, and 6 ml of lysozyme (10 mg/ml) were added to the cell suspension. After 10 min incubation at room temperature, 36 ml of lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 8.0, 62 mM EDTA) and 5 ml of 10% SDS were added to completely lysed the cells. Proteins were removed by phenol-CHCl3 extraction twice and CHCI3 extraction twice and genomic DNA was precipitated by addition of 1/10 volume of 3.5 M sodium acetate and equal volume of isopropanol and centrifugation at 15,000 rpm/min. The DNA pellet was washed with 50 ml of 70% ethanol and dried under vacuum. The DNA was resuspended in 10 ml of TE buffer and dialysed in 2 liters of TE buffer overnight at 4°C. Fifty μg of genomic DNA was digested with 1 unit, 0.5 unit, 0.25 unit, 0.125 unit of Sau3AI at 37°C for 30 min. The digested DNA was purified by phenol- CHCI3 extraction twice and CHCI3 extraction twice and ethanol precipitation. Vector pBR322 DNA was linearized by BamHI restriction enzyme and dephophorylated by CIP.The vector DNA was purified by phenol-CHCl3 extraction twice and CHCI3 extraction twice and ethanol precipitation. The Sau3AI partially digested genomic DNA was ligated with SamHI-cleaved and CIP-treated pBR322 DNA. The DNA ligation mixture was transformed into E. coli ER1992 (dinDlv.lacZ , hsdR, mcrA, mcrBC, mrr) competent cells. Forty blue colonies were found among 8,000 transformants. These forty strains were checked for endonuclease activity. Fourteen strains make Tth 111 endonuclease (Figure 2). Plasmid DNA from Tthl 11 l-producing strains were prepared and subjected to Tthl 111 restriction digestion. Twelve plasmids were linearized by Tthl 111 endonuclease, suggesting either methylase gene is not contained in the same fragment or it is not expressed 37°C. Three plasmids were partially resistant to Tthl 111, indicating the presence of the cognate methylase gene on the cloned fragment. EXAMPLE 4 CLONING OF ECOO109IR GENE BY COMBINATION OF METHYLASE SELECTION METHOD AND BLUE COLONY SCREENING METHOD In this Example, the possibility of combining the methylase selection method and the endonuclease indicator method for cloning of restriction endonuclease gene was tested. Genomic DNA of E. coli H709c (NEB # 361) was prepared as described in Example 2. The DNA was cleaved partially with Sau3AI as described in Example 2 and ligated to pBR322 (Bam HI linearized and CIP treated) at 16°C overnight. The ligation mixture was used to transform E. coli RR1 competent cells. A total of 10 5 transformants were pooled and inoculated into 500 ml LB medium. The cell culture was shaken overnight at 37°C. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 20 ml of buffer P1 (100 μg/ml RNAseA, 50 mM Tris-HCI, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Following addition of 20 ml buffer P2 (200 mM NaOH, 1 % SDS) and incubation at room temperature for five min, 20 ml of buffer P3 was added (2.55 M KAc, pH 4.8). The precipitates were removed by centrifugation at 4°C for 30 min (15,000 rpm/min). The supernatant was loaded into two Qiagen midi-columns preequilibrated with buffer QBT (750 mM NaCI, 50 mM MOPS, 15% ethanol, pH 7.0, 0.15% Triton X-100). The plasmid DNA was washed with 20 ml of buffer QC (1 M NaCI, 50 mM MOPS, 15% ethanol, pH 7.0) and eluted with 5 ml of buffer QF (1.25 mM NaCI, 50 mM MOPS, 15% ethanol, pH 8.2). The plasmid DNA was precipitated with equal volume of isopropanol and centrifugation at 4°C for 30 min. The DNA pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, dried under vacuum, and dissolved in 1 ml of TE buffer. Ten μg of plasmid DNA from the plasmid library was digested with 100 units of EcoO109l restriction enzyme at 37°C for three hours. The digested plasmid DNA was used to transform E. coli ER1992 (dinDlv.lacZ , hsdR, mcrA, mcrBC, mrr) and cells are plated on X-gal plus Ap plates. Fourteen blue colonies were found among 120 transformants. Ten ml of cell culture was made from each of 14 strains and cell extracts prepared (as described in Example 2) to assay for EcoO109l endonuclease activity on λ DNA substrate. Eight strains were found to make EcoO109l restriction endonuclease. By combining the methylase selection method and the endonuclease indicator method one could eliminate those clones that only carry methylase gene or lost cleavage sites after challenge but identify those clones that carry endonuclease gene alone or together with the methylase gene. EXAMPLE 5 CLONING OF A GENE CODING FOR A THERMOSTABLE DNA NUCLEASE (TF NUCLEASE) Genomic DNA from strain Thermus filiformis was prepared as described, in Example 2. The DNA was cleaved partially with Saι3AI as described in Example 2 and ligated to pBR322 (SamHI linearized and CIP treated) at 16°C overnight. The ligation mixture was used to transform E. coli ER1992 competent cells and plated on X-gal, Ap plates. A total of 8,000 transformants were obtained from one transformation experiment. Among these transformants, twenty-three blue colonies were found. Ten ml of cell culture were made from each of the 23 blue isolates and cell extracts prepared (as described in Example 2) to assay for DNA nuclease activity on pBR322 DNA substrate. The cell extract from one isolate (#17) displayed DNA nicking activity on pBR322 double-stranded DNA at 68°C incubation temperature. To further test the nuclease activity, M13mp18 RF form (double- stranded DNA) and single-stranded form were used as the substrates. Again, the nuclease shows DNA nicking activity on the double-stranded substrate. The single-stranded DNA were degraded with the addition of the nuclease. When double-stranded DNA (lambda DNA or M13 RF form) were incubated with the nuclease for a long period of time (12 hours), the DNA was also degraded. Therefore, we concluded the preferred substrate for Tf nuclease is single-stranded DNA. We also tested that the nuclease can be used for unidirectional deletion application such as after exonuclease III digestion of double-stranded DNA, the remaining single-stranded DNA can be removed by the Tf nuclease. SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INFORMATION: (i) APPLICANT: FOMENKOV, Aleksei DILA, Deborah RALEIGH, Elisabeth XU, Shuang-yong (ii) TITLE OF INVENTION: A METHOD FOR DIRECT CLONING OF NUCLEASE GENES IN E. COLI (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 7 (iv) CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: (A) ADDRESSEE: New England Biolabs, Inc. (B) STREET: 32 Tozer Road (C) CITY: Beverly (D) STATE: Massachusetts (E) COUNTRY: USA (F) ZIP: 01915 (v) COMPUTER READABLE FORM: (A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk (B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS (D) SOFTWARE: Patentin Release #1.0, Version #1.25 (vi) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: (B) FILING DATE: (C) CLASSIFICATION: (vii) PRIOR APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: US 08/247,990 (B) FILING DATE: 24-MAY-1994 (vii) PRIOR APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: US 08/356,898 (B) FILING DATE: 15-DEC-1994 (viii) ATTORNEY/AGENT INFORMATION: (A) NAME: WILLIAMS, Gregory D. (B) REGISTRATION NUMBER: 30901 (C) REFERENCE/DOCKET NUMBER: NEB-100-PCT (ix) TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION: (A) TELEPHONE: (508) 927-5054 (B) TELEFAX: (508) 927-1705 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID Nθ:l: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 4 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:l: TCGA 4 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2 : GACNNNGTC 9 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:3: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 1629 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: unknown (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:3: GTGGAAACCG TACAAATGAG CTTGGATTTA CAACCAGAAG ACACAAAAGC TAATATTGAG 60 TGTTCTTCTC CTGATTACGA AATAAAGTGT TTCTCCCATA ATCAATTTGC TCCTCAAATT 120 GAGCGTTTAA AAATTGAAAA AAAATACATT CATATTGTAG AAGAGACAGA AACATTTAAC 180 AGAAAATTAG TGAGTTACCA AGCCAACAAG AACCAATCAA TCCACAATTG GATTAGATAT 240 AAAGAGGGGT TCTCCTCCGA GTTGGTTCCA AATCTAATTG AAGAGTTTGG ATTATCAAAA 300 GGTGACACTA TATTAGACCC TTTTCTAGGC TCAGGAACTA CAAGTCTGAC TCCGAGAATA 360 CTCGGAATAG ATAGTATTGG AATAGACATT TTGCCAATTT CACACATAGC ATTTGAACCC 420 AAATCCTTTA TCTTTGAATA TAATCTCGAA GAACTAGATA GGGCCTATAG AGAAATATGC 480 GAAATATCGC CAACGAAGAT AGACCAAAAG TTTAATCATT TAAGTATAGC TGAGGGCGCT 540 TTTCCAGAAG AAACAGAAAA TGACCTTTTA TTTTTTACCC ATTGGGATAA TAACTCACAG 600 TATAGTTATC AAACCAAAAC GTTAATAAAA TTAATCTTGG TAAGCATACT AGAAGAGATT 660 AGCTATACTA GAAAAGATGG GCAATATTTA AGATGGGATT ATAGATCACA GAAGGTTATC 720 GAAACTAATA AAAAAAGACT TGAACAAGGA AAAGAGCCAA TTAAAACCAT ATTAGATAAG 780 GGCGAACTTC CTACTGTGAA AGAGTCCCTT TTAAACACTC TTTTAACAAT AAAAGAAGAT 840 ATAAAAGAAA TACAACAAAA ATGTTTACCT AATGAGTCCG TTCATGAACT TATAAAAGAC 900 AGTGCACTTA ATGCACTACC TAAAATTAAT GATAATACTT TTGACGCTGT TATTACTTCC 960 CCCCCATATT GCAATAGATA CGACTACACT AGAACATATG CACTTGAACT TGCTTACTTA 1020 GGGGTAGATG AAAAGAAGAT AAGAGAATTA AGACAAGCAC AACTTTCGTG TACAGTAGAA 1080 AATAAATCTA AACTTAAACA ACTAAAGGAC TACTACCATT CACTTTTCCT AGAAAGTAGA 1140 TACGCAGAAA TTGAACGACT TGTAACAGGA AATGAGGTAT TAAATGAAAT TAATTACGCT 1200 TTAAGGAAGC GCTGGGAAAA CGGTGAGGTT AATAACAAGG GTATACTTTC AATGGTTGAC 1260 GGATATTTTA CAGAGTTAAC CTTTATATTT TATGAACTAT TTAGAACGTG TAAGCCAGGA 1320 GCTAAAGTTG CCTTTGTTAA TGATAATGTT CGGTATGCAG GTGAAATTAT CCCTGTTGAT 1380 TTCTTATCAA CGAAAATTGC AGAAGATATC GGTTTTAAAC CAATTAAAAT CTATACACTA 1440 AAACAAAGAA AAGGCAATAG CAGTCAACAA ATGGGTAAGT ATGGCAAGAG TAGCGTTAAG 1500 AAAAAGCATC ACAATATGGG AAAAACCATA AGAGTGAGCA CAGTCTCACT CTCTTTTTAT 1560 TTTTATCGCA ACTTATCCCC CACATATAAC GATTACTATG GCGGAAGGGG GAAGAAAGAT 1620 GATAATTGA 1629 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:4: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 966 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: unknown (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:4: TTGAACACTC AAAAACCTTT TGAAAATCAT CTAAAAAGTG TAGACGATTT AAAAACGACA 60 TATGAAGAAT ACAGAGCAGG ATTTATTGCT TTTGCTTTAG AGAAAAATAA ACGCTCTACC 120 CCATATATTG AGAGAGCACG AGCATTAAAA GTTGCTGCAT CTGTTGCAAA AACACCAAAA 180 GATTTACTTT ACTTGGAAGA TATTCAAGAC GCTCTCCTTT ATGCGTCGGG TATTTCTGAT 240 AAAGCAAAGA CATTCTTAAC GGAAGATGAT AAAAAGGAGT CTATAAATAA TTTAATTGAG 300 AACTTTTTGG GACCTGCCGG AGAGGAGTTT ATAGCCGAGT TAATATTCCG CTATTTATTA 360 TTCCAAGGCC TAGGAGGAAC AATGAGAAAC ATAGCAGGTG CACTCGCTCA ACAAAAATTA 420 ACAAGAGCAA TAATCTCTGC CTCGGATATT GCTAATATCC CTTATAAATG GTTAGACTCA 480 CGAGATAAAA AGTACACTAA TTGGATGGAC AAGCCTGAGG ATGATTACGA ATTAGAAACA 540 TTTGCTAAAG GTATTAGCTG GACTATTAAC GGAAAACACA GAACTTTAAT GTATAATATT 600 ACTGTTCCAC TTGTAAAAAA GAATGTTGAT ATATGTTTAT TTAACTGTGA ACCTGAAATA 660 TATACGCCAC AAAAAGTACA CCAACAGCCT GAAAAGTATC TACTGCTTGG AGAGTTAAAG 720 GGCGGAATAG ACCCTGCTGG AGCGGATGAA CATTGGAAAA CACCAAATAC TGCTCTTACT 780 AGGATTAGAA ATAAATTCTC CGAAAAGGGA TTATCACCTA AAACAATTTT TATAGGCGCT 840 GCTATTGAGC ATAGTATGGC AGAAGAAATA TGGGACCAAC TTCAATCCGG TTCATTAACA 900 AACTCAGCAA ATCTTACTAA AACTGAACAA GTAGGCTCTC TTTGTAGATG GATAATTAAT 960 ATATAA 966 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:5: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 542 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: unknown (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:5: Met Glu Thr Val Gin Met Ser Leu Asp Leu Gin Pro Glu Asp Thr Lys 1 5 10 15 Ala Asn lie Glu Cys Ser Ser Pro Asp Tyr Glu lie Lys Cys Phe Ser 20 25 30 His Asn Gin Phe Ala Pro Gin He Glu Arg Leu Lys He Glu Lys Lys 35 40 45 Tyr He His He Val Glu Glu Thr Glu Thr Phe Asn Arg Lys Leu Val 50 55 60 Ser Tyr Gin Ala Asn Lys Asn Gin Ser He His Asn Trp He Arg Tyr 65 70 75 80 Lys Glu Gly Phe Ser Ser Glu Leu Val Pro Asn Leu He Glu Glu Phe 85 90 95 Gly Leu Ser Lys Gly Asp Thr He Leu Asp Pro Phe Leu Gly Ser Gly 100 105 110 Thr Thr Ser Leu Thr Pro Arg He Leu Gly He Asp Ser He Gly He 115 120 125 Asp He Leu Pro He Ser His He Ala Phe Glu Pro Lys Ser Phe He 130 135 140 Phe Glu Tyr Asn Leu Glu Glu Leu Asp Arg Ala Tyr Arg Glu He Cys 145 150 155 160 Glu He Ser Pro Thr Lys He Asp Gin Lys Phe Asn His Leu Ser He 165 170 175 Ala Glu Gly Ala Phe Pro Glu Glu Thr Glu Asn Asp Leu Leu Phe Phe 180 185 190 Thr His Trp Asp Asn Asn Ser Gin Tyr Ser Tyr Gin Thr Lys Thr Leu 195 200 205 He Lys Leu He Leu Val Ser He Leu Glu Glu He Ser Tyr Thr Arg 210 215 220 Lys Asp Gly Gin Tyr Leu Arg Trp Asp Tyr Arg Ser Gin Lys Val He 225 230 235 240 Glu Thr Asn Lys Lys Arg Leu Glu Gin Gly Lys Glu Pro He Lys Thr 245 250 255 He Leu Asp Lys Gly Glu Leu Pro Thr Val Lys Glu Ser Leu Leu Asn 260 265 270 Thr Leu Leu Thr He Lys Glu Asp He Lys Glu He Gin Gin Lys Cys 275 280 285 Leu Pro Asn Glu Ser Val His Glu Leu He Lys Asp Ser Ala Leu Asn 290 295 300 Ala Leu Pro Lys He Asn Asp Asn Thr Phe Asp Ala Val He Thr Ser 305 310 315 320 Pro Pro Tyr Cys Asn Arg Tyr Asp Tyr Thr Arg Thr Tyr Ala Leu Glu 325 330 335 Leu Ala Tyr Leu Gly Val Asp Glu Lys Lys He Arg Glu Leu Arg Gin 340 345 350 Ala Gin Leu Ser Cys Thr Val Glu Asn Lys Ser Lys Leu Lys Gin Leu 355 360 365 Lys Asp Tyr Tyr His Ser Leu Phe Leu Glu Ser Arg Tyr Ala Glu He 370 375 380 Glu Arg Leu Val Thr Gly Asn Glu Val Leu Asn Glu He Asn Tyr Ala 385 390 395 400 Leu Arg Lys Arg Trp Glu Asn Gly Glu Val Asn Asn Lys Gly He Leu 405 410 415 Ser Met Val Asp Gly Tyr Phe Thr Glu Leu Thr Phe He Phe Tyr Glu 420 425 430 Leu Phe Arg Thr Cys Lys Pro Gly Ala Lys Val Ala Phe Val Asn Asp 435 440 445 Asn Val Arg Tyr Ala Gly Glu He He Pro Val Asp Phe Leu Ser Thr 450 455 460 Lys He Ala Glu Asp He Gly Phe Lys Pro He Lys He Tyr Thr Leu 465 470 475 480 Lys Gin Arg Lys Gly Asn Ser Ser Gin Gin Met Gly Lys Tyr Gly Lys 485 490 495 Ser Ser Val Lys Lys Lys His His Asn Met Gly Lys Thr He Arg Val 500 505 510 Ser Thr Val Ser Leu Ser Phe Tyr Phe Tyr Arg Asn Leu Ser Pro Thr 515 520 525 Tyr Asn Asp Tyr Tyr Gly Gly Arg Gly Lys Lys Asp Asp Asn 530 535 540 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:6: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 321 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: unknown (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 6: Met Asn Thr Gin Lys Pro Phe Glu Asn His Leu Lys Ser Val Asp Asp 1 5 10 15 Leu Lys Thr Thr Tyr Glu Glu Tyr Arg Ala Gly Phe He Ala Phe Ala 20 25 30 Leu Glu Lys Asn Lys Arg Ser Thr Pro Tyr He Glu Arg Ala Arg Ala 35 40 45 Leu Lys Val Ala Ala Ser Val Ala Lys Thr Pro Lys Asp Leu Leu Tyr 50 55 60 Leu Glu Asp He Gin Asp Ala Leu Leu Tyr Ala Ser Gly He Ser Asp 65 70 75 80 Lys Ala Lys Thr Phe Leu Thr Glu Asp Asp Lys Lys Glu Ser He Asn 85 90 95 Asn Leu He Glu Asn Phe Leu Gly Pro Ala Gly Glu Glu Phe He Ala 100 105 110 Glu Leu He Phe Arg Tyr Leu Leu Phe Gin Gly Leu Gly Gly Thr Met 115 120 125 Arg Asn He Ala Gly Ala Leu Ala Gin Gin Lys Leu Thr Arg Ala He 130 135 140 He Ser Ala Ser Asp He Ala Asn He Pro Tyr Lys Trp Leu Asp Ser 145 150 155 160 Arg Asp Lys Lys Tyr Thr Asn Trp Met Asp Lys Pro Glu Asp Asp Tyr 165 170 175 Glu Leu Glu Thr Phe Ala Lys Gly He Ser Trp Thr He Asn Gly Lys 180 185 190 His Arg Thr Leu Met Tyr Asn He Thr Val Pro Leu Val Lys Lys Asn 195 200 205 Val Asp He Cys Leu Phe Asn Cys Glu Pro Glu He Tyr Thr Pro Gin 210 215 220 Lys Val His Gin Gin Pro Glu Lys Tyr Leu Leu Leu Gly Glu Leu Lys 225 230 235 240 Gly Gly He Asp Pro Ala Gly Ala Asp Glu His Trp Lys Thr Pro Asn 245 250 255 Thr Ala Leu Thr Arg He Arg Asn Lys Phe Ser Glu Lys Gly Leu Ser 260 265 270 Pro Lys Thr He Phe He Gly Ala Ala He Glu His Ser Met Ala Glu 275 280 285 Glu He Trp Asp Gin Leu Gin Ser Gly Ser Leu Thr Asn Ser Ala Asn 290 295 300 Leu Thr Lys Thr Glu Gin Val Gly Ser Leu Cys Arg Trp He He Asn 305 310 315 320 He (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:7: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 6 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: unknown (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:7: CSCGWG

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A method for isolating DNA coding for a nuclease comprising the steps of: (a) forming a DNA library from a source coding for the nuclease; (b) ligating the DNA of step (a) into an appropriate cloning vector; (c) transforming a host cell which (i) contains a DNA damage- inducing promoter fused to an indicator/reporter gene, and (ii) is deficient in one or more methylation-dependent restriction systems with the cloning vector of step (b); (d) plating and incubating the transformed host cells of step (c) on indicator plates containing a substrate which reacts with the expression product of the indicator/reporter gene and appropriate antibiotics; and (e) selecting appropriate colonies from the plated transformed host cells of step (d) and screening for the presence of expressed nuclease. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the DNA damage-inducing promoter fused to the indicator/reporter gene is dinD1 r.lacZ . 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the substrate which reacts with the expression product of the indicator/reporter gene is X-gal. 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the selection of step (c) is effected by choosing medium to dark blue colonies. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the nuclease is a restriction endonuclease. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the host cell is deficient in all methylation-dependent restriction systems. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the host cell of step (c) is a strain of E. coli . 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the host cell is E. coli ER1992. 9. A host cell for cloning a nuclease, wherein the host cell contains a DNA damage-inducing promoter fused to an indicator/reporter gene and which is deficient in all methylation-dependent restriction systems. 10. The host cell of claim 9, wherein the host cell is a strain of E. coli . 11. The host cell of claim 10, wherein the host cell is E. coli ER1992. 12. Isolated DNA coding for the SsoBI restriction endonuclease, wherein the isolated DNA is obtainable from the vector pSsoRL 13. A recombinant DNA vector comprising a vector into which a DNA segment coding for the SsoBI restriction endonuclease has been inserted. 14. A cloning vector which comprises the isolated DNA of claim 12. 15. A host cell transformed by the cloning vector of claim 14. 16. A method of producing an SsoBI restriction endonuclease comprising culturing a host cell transformed with the vector of claim 14 under conditions suitable for expression of said endonuclease. 17. Isolated DNA coding for the DNA nuclease obtainable from Thermus filiformis. 18. A recombinant vector comprising a vector into which the DNA nuclease obtainable from T. fililformis restriction endonuclease has been inserted. 19. A recombinant vector comprising the isolated DNA of claim 17. 20. A host cell transformed with the recombinant vector of claim 18 or 19. 21. A method of producing the DNA nuclease obtainable from T. filiformis comprising culturing a host cell transformed with the vector of claim 18 or 19 under conditions suitable for expression of said DNA nuclease. 22. Isolated DNA coding for 7-7,1111 restriction endonuclease, wherein the isolated DNA is obtainable from Thermus thermophilus. 23. A recombinant vector comprising a vector into which DNA coding for T-7.1111 restriction endonuclease has been inserted. 24. A recombinant vector comprising the isolated DNA of claim 22. 25. A host cell transformed with the recombinant vector of claim 23 or 24. 26. A method of producing Tthλ 111 restriction endonuclease comprising culturing a host cell transformed with the vector of claim 23 or 24 under conditions suitable for expression of said endonuclease. 27. Isolated DNA coding for EcoO1091 restriction endonuclease, wherein the isolated DNA is obtainable from E. coli H709c. 28. A recombinant vector comprising a vector into which DNA coding for EcoO1091 restriction endonuclease has been inserted. 29. A recombinant vector comprising the isolated DNA of claim 27. 30. A host cell transformed with the recombinant vector of claim 28 or 29. 31. A method of producing EcoO1091 restriction endonuclease comprising culturing a host cell transformed with the vector or claim 28 or 29 under conditions suitable for expression of said endonuclease.

Inventors: DILA DEBORAH KAY, FOMENKOV ALEKSEI, RALEIGH ELISABETH A, XU SHUANG-YONG, DILA, DEBORAH, KAY, FOMENKOV, ALEKSEI, RALEIGH, ELISABETH, A., XU, SHUANG-YONG
Applicants: DILA DEBORAH KAY, FOMENKOV ALEKSEI, NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS INC, RALEIGH ELISABETH A, XU SHUANG YONG, DILA, DEBORAH, KAY, FOMENKOV, ALEKSEI, NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS, INC., RALEIGH, ELISABETH, A., XU, SHUANG-YONG
Application year: 1995
Main classification: C12N9
IPC codes: C12N1, C12N9, C12N15, C12R1