FEED FOR FARMED FISH, METHOD TO PROVIDE FISH OF HIGH QUALITY AND USE OF ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS TO PREPARE SAID FEED

Abstract: The present invention relates to a fish feed, a method to provide fish having high quality and use of additional components to prepare said feed. Urea and possibly also TMAO or other additional components with similar methyl donating properties are added to a standard feed. Fish-like rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon fed with the invented feed surprisingly achieve flesh having a significantly stronger colour than fish fed with other known feeds. The invented feed further has surprisingly showed prophylactic properties related to development of ulcers on the fish skin. Additionally, said feed is favourable according to fast digestibility and salt-water tolerance.

Description: FEED FOR FARMED FISH, METHOD TO PROVIDE FISH OF HIGH QUALITY AND USE OF ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS TO PREPARE SAID FEED The present invention relates to a feed for farmed fish. The invention further comprises a method to provide fish of high quality and use of additional components to prepare said feed. The main purpose of the invention is to contribute to low cost production of high quality salmonides like rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon. For the aquaculture industry it has long been an economic problem that farmed fish like salmon and trout do not naturally achieve the same strongly red colour as the wild species. Such farmed fishes are palely red, unless large amount of synthetic red pigments are supplemented to the feed, and therefore not as attractive as the wild fish to the customers. In a world wide investigation, it is shown that next to product freshness the colour of the flesh is the most important quality criteria for the Atlantic salmon and thus fundamental for market acceptance and price (Koteng, 1992; Markedsundersøkelse Norsk Laks. FNL. Bergen. Norway). Hence, to obtain a elite image and high market value of salmonides with regard to characteristic red or pink flesh pigmentation, pigments like astaxanthin are added to the feeds to make the fish more red. The deposition rate of astaxanthin in the muscle of salmonides depends on several factors. These include the dietary source of astaxanthin, the concentration of astaxanthin, dietary fat content, and physiological factors such as fish size, growth rate, maturation, and genetic factors (Torrissen et al., 1995; «Astaxanthin deposition in the flesh of Atlantic salmon; Salmo salarL., in relation to dietary astaxanthin concentration and feeding period», in Aquaculture nutrition, 77-84). The supplement of pigments in the diets of salmonides represent a considerable part of the feed cost. In Norway for example, the astaxanthin supplement in Atlantic salmon diets represents about 20% of the feed costs, or close to 10% of the total production costs. This is mainly due to the low retention of dietary astaxanthin. Thus, increasing the dietary level of astaxanthin from 60 to 100 mg/kg gives an insignificant increase in muscle concentration of only 3% (Torrissen et al., 1995), and several studies have shown that increasing the dietary concentration of astaxanthin above 40 mg/kg gives a significantly reduced relative astaxanthin retention (%). Hence, to improve quality and to reduce production costs, it would be of great importance to develop a feed which improve the retention of dietary astaxanthin. Another problem in fish farming is development of ulcers on the fish skin, especially for big salmon in the winter when the temperature is low, and for 0 + -smolt the first winter at sea. Ulcers increase mortality and reduce the price since slaughtered fish with ulcers are down classified from superior to production quality. M. Staurnes et al. (Aquaculture, vol. 90, 1990; «Distanced, water-filled stomach in sea farmed rainbow trout»., pp. 333-343) have reported that a large amount of rainbow trout which are cultured in salt water develop a considerably enlarged abdomen. This is connected to a great enlarged stomach containing water and fat. There is today no treatments for fish suffering from this disease. In addition to the above mention problems, the rainbow trout, and in some cases also the salmon, have problems with the fat digestibility. The condition characterised as «fat belching» is put in association with the occurrence of water-filled stomach (O. Einen, Hovedoppgave ved NLH, 1989: «Eit studium av vassbuk hos regnbogeaure»). The main object of the present invention is therefore to provide a fish feed which improves the quality of the fish with regard to colour, ulcers and fat digestibility. The inventors wanted to examine the effect of urea and/or trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) in the feed with regard to promotion of growth and saltwater tolerance of the fish. Commercial fish feeds supplemented with trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) is known from for example our own Norwegian patent no. 920083 where TMAO is added to the feed to achieve an optimum level of bio-available dietary iron, and French patent no. 2561871 where TMAO was supplemented to make the feed more appetising to the fish. From U.S. patent no. 3.930.018 using isobutylidene diurea as an additional component in the feed for pisciculture in the purpose of promoting growth is known. Furthermore, the utilization of dietary urea in rainbow trout has been studied by Kaushik. et al. in 1983 («Utilization of dietary urea in rainbow trout», Ann. Nutr. Metab., 27: 94-106). During our studies concerning the effect of urea and/or TMAO supplemented to a standard feed; i.e. a feed comprising proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and one or more further components like fillers, adhesives, preservatives, vitamins, minerals and pigments, an unexpected positive short term effect on salt water tolerance was observed. It was suφrisingly found that addition of urea in contrast to addition of TMAO, lead to stable osmolality in the fish for months. It was performed analyses of urea in the blood and the muscle in small rainbow trout (Figure 1A). Additionally, analyses of urea in the muscle of big rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon were performed (Figure 1B). The analyses showed that urea did not accumulate in the fish. More suφrisingly and unexpected it was observed that the colour of the fish flesh for the fish fed with feed where urea and TMAO were added, was significantly more red than for the fish fed with the control feed not having additional amounts of urea and TMAO. Colour analyses of the flesh of rainbow trout showing significantly stronger colour were performed (Figure 2). Thus, an optimised effect of the pigment in the feed is achieved. It was further suφrisingly observed that development of ulcers on the skin of the fish fed with the urea and/or TMAO supplemented feed was considerably less than for fish fed with the control feed not having urea and TMAO added. This is further shown in Figure 3 where experimental data of vesicles in the fish skin of rainbow trout are expressed. It was accordingly shown that supplement of urea and/or TMAO to the feed had positive effect with regard to reduction of fat droplets on the sea surface produced by the fish, and thus reduction of fat belching, even when high energy feed was used (Figure 4). The total TMAO content in the feed should be in the range 5 - 20 g/kg feed, preferentially 5 -15 g/kg. Additional components with similar methyl donating properties as TMAO, for instance betain or choline, can be added to the standard fish feed instead of TMAO, to improve the fat metabolism in farmed fish. The content of urea in the feed should be in the range 3 - 60 g/kg feed, preferentially 3 - 30 g/kg. The scope of the invention and its special features are as defined in the attached claims. The invention is further described and explained in the following description of the figures, the attached figures and the examples. Figure 1. Shows levels of urea in plasma and flesh of rainbow trout during the first 36 weeks in sea water (A), and levels of urea in flesh of rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon after a weight gain from 2.0 to 4.5 kg and from 0.6 to 1.2 kg, respectively, in sea water (B). Figure 2. Shows colour analyses of rainbow trout fed control or experimental diets. Figure 3. Shows development of vesicle in the skin of rainbow trout fed control diet compared to experimental diets. Figure 4. Shows variation in fat belching for rainbow trout. Figure 1A and 1B show about the same accumulation of urea in the flesh of Atlantic salmon as in rainbow trout, and apparently independent of the amount of dietary urea. Addition of dietary urea led to a stable, but small increase in plasma urea of only 0.5 mM. Hence, dietary urea is totally excreted. Figure 2 shows significantly increased redness, yellowness and chromaticity for rainbow trout fed experimental diets supplemented with urea compared to fish fed control diet without any supplement. A significant increase in both redness and yellowness, and therefore in chromaticity, but not in hue, indicate that supplement of dietary urea improve the retention of dietary astaxanthin. Figure 3 shows that supplement of dietary urea in the experimental feeds had a highly significant and positive effect on development of vesicle in the skin of rainbow trout. Vesicles developed into open sores after 36 weeks are only present among fish fed the control diet. Figure 4 shows a significantly reduced number of fat droplets in net pens where rainbow trout fed experimental diets supplemented with either TMAO or TMAO and urea were kept. Hence, the positive effect was due to TMAO and the addition of urea did not interfere the TMAO's effect on fat belching. In all experiments the same commercial BioOptimal® recite (see table 1) was used as basis feed. Said feed is present in different sizes, i.e. pellets having diameter 3,5 mm, 4,5 mm, 6,5 mm, 9,0 mm and 12,0 mm. Table 1 : Size: 3,5 mm Size: 6,5 mm 4,5 mm 9,0 mm 12,0 mm Contents: Water (max.), % 10.0 10.0 Crude protein, % 42.0 40.0 (fish meal based) Fat (Soxhlet), % 26.0 30.0 Carbohydrates, % (NFE) 15.5 13.5 Fibre, % 0.6 0.6 Ash, % 7.8 7.8 Astaxanthin, mg/kg 27.5-50.0 50.0-60.0 Gross Energy, MJ/kg 22.8 23.60 The control feed was coated with pure water, while the experimental feeds were coated with a water solution of urea alone, a mixed solution of urea and TMAO, or TMAO alone. The amount of supplement was 1% for all components, individually. After coating, the feeds were air dried for 2 days before administered to the fish. Finally, all tests were performed in duplicated net pens at AKVAFORSK's sea site, Averøy, apart from two studies of flesh colour in commercial fish farms where the experimental feed was not supplemented by coating, but during production of the feed. Ten fish per net pen were randomly sampled for analyses and the statistics were performed by GLM in SAS. Example 1. This was a study on accumulation of dietary urea in rainbow trout as well as in Atlantic salmon. The study was performed by recurrent sampling of rainbow trout after transfer to sea (Figure 1 A), and on rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon after a weight gain from 2.0 to 4.5 kg and from 0.6 to 1.2 kg, respectively (Figure 1B). Sampling of plasma and flesh from 10 fish per pen each 6 weeks after sea transfer always showed about the same amount of urea in the flesh whether the rainbow trout were fed experimental diet supplemented with urea and TMAO or control feed (Figure 1A). The same result was also observed in trials with rainbow trout fed urea and TMAO and Atlantic salmon fed urea alone after doubling of the body weight (Figure 1B). A significant increase in plasma urea in rainbow trout fed urea supplement, compared to the control fish was observed. However, this increase is probably without any practical significance since it correspond to an increase of only 0.5 mM. It can therefore be concluded that the addition of urea in the feeds is not leading to accumulation of urea in the fish and that urea is not an active osmolytt in rainbow trout. This is according to the observations of Kaushik et al. (1983). They concluded that dietary urea is totally excreted leading to no beneficial effect on nitrogen balance, and since the circulating levels of urea in the blood were low, the osmoregulatory role of urea in teleost is considered to be of limited importance. Example 2. In the trials with rainbow trout in example 1 it was suφrisingly observed that when the fish were slaughtered at the end of the experiment, those fed experimental diet had a more red flesh than those fed control feed. This was documented by measurements of flesh colour by Minolta Chroma Meter. The instrument records the values L* (lightness), a* (redness) and b* (yellowness). H° ab (hue) and c* (chromaticity) were calculated as H° ab = arctan (b*/a*) and c* = sqrt(a* 2 + b *2 ). H° ab = 0 is pure red. Colour analyses were performed at the cutlet side just behind the end of the dorsal fin (Norwegian Quality Cut). In addition, rainbow trout were sampled from two commercial farms testing the idea for only 6 and 10 weeks (body weight 0.6 to 0.8 kg). In the commercial farms, the experimental feed was supplemented with urea alone since prior studies with TMAO alone had not shown any positive effect on flesh colour. Testing together, all measurements, except hue, were significantly higher for rainbow trout fed commercial feed supplemented with urea (+ TMAO) than for those fed commercial feed without any supplement (Figure 2). A significant different flesh colour between fish in the 4 trials was also observed, but this was most certainly due to the great differences in fish size. Observation of the same increase in redness for fish fed experimental feeds containing a mix of urea and TMAO, and urea alone shows that the positive effect was due to the urea supplement alone. Finally, observation of a significantly increase in both redness and yellowness, and therefore in chromaticity, but not in hue, indicate that supplement of dietary urea improve the retention of dietary astaxanthin. Example 3. Together with the periodic sampling of the fish for urea accumulation in example 1 , all fish were weighted. During the handling of the rainbow trout it was observed vesicle in the skin after 9 weeks. Since a statistic test suφrisingly showed significantly more vesicle in the skin of fish fed control diet than diet supplemented with urea and TMAO (E1), every 6 weeks during the trial all fish (about 200 per pen) were recorded for vesicle. In all 10 samplings we observed a higher proportion of fish with vesicles among those fed control feed than among fish fed experimental diet (Figure 3). This shows a highly significant (p<0.0001) and positive effect of the experimental feed. On average 10% of the control fish, whereas only 1.8% of the fish fed experimental feed had vesicles. By testing for differences in single samplings, we observed significantly less vesicles in 7 out of the 10 samplings. Earlier studies with TMAO had not shown such effect, but to test whether this was an effect of urea supplement alone, a trial was started (week 36) where the rainbow trout were fed urea supplement alone (E2). By sampling of the fish in week 40, we observed significantly less vesicle among these fishes than among the control fish (1.0% vs. 11.9%, Figure 3). The vesicles developed into open sores after 36 weeks, but only among fish fed the control diet (6% vs. 0%; p<0.05). Hence, during the trial which lasted for almost a year we observed a highly positive effect by supplementing the feed with urea. The positive result was quite suφrising since Lunder (1992; "Winter ulcer in Atlantic salmon", dr.thesis, The Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine) had isolated Vibrio spp. from manifest winter ulcers, and concluded from cohabitation experiments that the condition was transmissible, indicating that ulcers were due to a bacterial infection. In our experiment the vesicles developed into open sores only at the time of lowest sea temperature, which might suggest that dietary urea supplement also has a corresponding positive effect on winter ulcers in Atlantic salmon. Example 4. In the experiment with big rainbow trout (from 2.0 to 4.5 kg) in example 1 fat belching was recorded as number of fat droplets seen on the sea surface in each net pen about every 4 week. Beside a control feed, the rainbow trout was fed two experimental diets supplemented with TMAO alone or a mixed supplement of TMAO and urea. During the trial which lasted 17 weeks, we observed a significant effect of diets. Number of fat droplets varied significantly between weeks, but whenever droplets were seen it was always most in pens where the fish were fed control feed. During our 6 sampling times on average 7.3 fat droplets was observed from each net pen where the fish were fed control feed, whereas 2.1 or 2.2 droplets was recorded for fish fed TMAO or TMAO/urea, respectively (Figure 4). It appears from figure 4 that the effect of supplement is almost the same for feeds with only TMAO addition as for feeds with addition of both TMAO and urea. This shows that the positive effect was due to TMAO and that the addition of urea did not interfere the TMAO's effect on fat belching. By the present invention the inventors have succeeded in providing a feed, a method to provide fish of high quality and use of additional components to prepare said feed. By addition of urea and possibly TMAO or other methyl donating compounds like for instance betain and choline to a standard feed the quality related to colour of the fish flesh and development of ulcers on the skin is significantly improved. The invention therefore introduces a complete solution to several factors which are unfavourable for farmed fish compared to wild species and which reduce the production of farmed fish. This occur first of all as the colour of the fish flesh in trout and salmon is more strongly red than for farmed fish fed with other known feeds, and hence the retention of dietary astaxanthin is improved. Further, development of ulcers on the skin is kept to an absolutely minimum. Fat belching is reduced by using the feed according to the invention. No harmful amounts of urea in the blood or the muscle in the fish are registered. The invention thus discloses a feed which involves possibilities for low cost production of high quality fish.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. Feed for farmed fish like rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon, providing high quality fish related to colour of fish flesh, ulcers on fish skin, fat digestibility and salt-water tolerance, characterized in that the feed is a standard feed where urea and possibly also TMAO or other additional components with similar methyl donating properties are added. 2. Feed according to claim 1 , characterized in that the total amount of urea is 3 - 60 g urea/kg feed. 3. Feed according to claim 1 and 2, characterized in that the total amount of urea is 3 - 30 g urea/kg feed. 4. Feed according to claim 1 , characterized in that the total amount of TMAO is 5 - 20 g TMAO/kg feed, preferentially 5 - 15 g TMAO/kg feed. 5. Method to provide farmed fish like rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon, having high quality related to colour of fish flesh, ulcers on fish skin, fat digestibility and salt-water tolerance, characterized in that the fish is given a standard fish feed where urea and possibly also TMAO or other additional components with similar methyl donating properties are added. 6. Use of urea and possibly also TMAO or other additional components with similar methyl donating properties for preparation of a feed for farmed fish like rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon containing standard feed components, for providing high quality fish related to colour of fish flesh, ulcers on fish skin, fat digestibility and salt-water tolerance.

Inventors: ROERVIK KJELL ARNE, STEIEN SVEIN HALLBJDOERN, ROERVIK, KJELL, ARNE, STEIEN, SVEIN, HALLBJDOERN
Applicants: NORSK HYDRO AS, ROERVIK KJELL ARNE, STEIEN SVEIN HALLBJDOERN, NORSK HYDRO A.S, ROERVIK, KJELL, ARNE, STEIEN, SVEIN, HALLBJDOERN
Application year: 1995
Main classification: A23K1
IPC codes: A23K1, A61K31, A61P43