Radar apparatus with RFI suppression

Abstract: Improvement of radar signal-to-noise ratio and detection sensitivity in radar systems is achieved by methods employing the subtraction of the unwanted radio frequency interference, RFI, or "clone" signals thereof, from the total received signal. The Clone signals are appropriately adjusted in phase and amplitude, and are obtained from an auxilliary broad beam antenna or from a delayed sample from the system's principal antenna. When multiple RFI signals at different frequencies are present, the entire receive band is subdivided into a plurality of frequency sub-ranges.

Description: This invention relates to suppression of radio frequency interference in wideband radar and radio communication receivers and, more particularly, to a radar apparatus to reliably operate pulse radar and communications systems in the presence of multiple sources of interference signals. The continuing proliferation of radio frequency sources operating in an ever more congested radio frequency spectrum creates increasing interference to radar system operation. In a sense, what constitutes music to the ears of those operating the other radio frequency sources is noise to one's own system, radio frequency noise, or, simply, RFI. At times the RFI level is so great that it completely obscures or masks the radar echoes produced by one's radar system and reduces the radar system's ability to detect the desired echo signal from amongst the background signals or clutter, effectively reducing radar system sensitivity. The interfering RF signals which the present invention addresses are principally narrow band, operating essentially at one frequency, either intermittently or continuously, as example, the higher harmonics of a shortwave broadcast station or a police radar, and also encompasses RFI over a band of frequencies, as example, produced by a television station. Although the RFI energy can be very low and might be disregarded in many instances, for radar systems, RFI cannot be disregarded, since radar echoes often are very low in power level. That is especially so when the echoing surface employs modern radar suppression technologies, "stealth", to reduce radar cross section and reflected signal strength. Wideband radar systems generate pulses of microwave energy, having very short rise and fall times, or square pulse, as variously termed, and look for return of an echo, the signal reflected from a surface. The amplitude of the echo signal may vary from large to very small, depending upon the distance the echo signal travels from a reflecting object and the reflectivity characteristic of that object. To ensure accurate display of that wideband echo, faithfully reproducing the pulse shape, the systems radar receiver, hence, must have a wide band characteristic at least equal to that of the transmitted pulse. Advanced pulse communications systems may also be wide band in nature. While the station to station distance is usually known in communication systems, the range of those stations, that is, the distance between the communications stations, can be increased, assuming the power level remains fixed, by reducing RF interference. Such radio frequency interference is not new. Elimination of the adverse effect of RFI in a radar receiver has typically been accomplished by incorporation of notch filters in the receiver. The notch filter is a radio frequency filter that has a sharply defined frequency characteristic that is tuned to the frequency of the offending RFI source. It selects and effectively blocks passage of the RFI through the receiver's amplifier sections. An adverse side effect is that the notch filter also consumes or dissipates a portion of the desired signal's power, effectively reducing receiver sensitivity. Since the notch filter remains permanently in the circuit, the side effect continues, irrespective of whether the offending station is on the air or not. In modern times many interfering RF sources are present at different frequencies, requiring a corresponding number of notch filters in the receiving system. The notch filter's side effect of dissipating a portion of the desired signal is unfortunately cumulative. As new sources of RFI present themselves, then additional notch filters must be incorporated into the receiver system to block out such added RFI sources. To construct and install those filters is a time consuming and costly task, in addition to the consequent loss of signal strength caused to the desired signal. Minimization of RFI is also achieved by use of directional antennas. Radar antennas are designed to be highly directional. That directivity minimizes reception of RFI as may propagate to the antenna from other directions, astride the antenna's axis. Nonetheless even such highly directional antennas contain off directional areas of sensitivity, commonly referred to as side lobes. And offending levels of RFI can be received though such side lobes. While side lobes can be minimized it is not possible to eliminate them entirely. Adaptive interference cancellation in radar systems is described in detail by Fielding J.G. et al in Radar, 1977, London, UK,25.-28.Oct. 1977, pages 212-217, BNSDOCID:XP 002095544A, London, UK, IEE, UK. An apparatus for transmitting and receiving pulsed radar frequency signals in the possible presence of narrow band RFI signals created by a plurality of extraneous narrow band RFI sources comprises counter signal generating means (auxiliary antenna, receiver, detector and amplifier) for producing a counter signal of essentially the same amplitude as and phase with the RFI signal, and combiner means for subtractively combining the RFI signal with said counter signal, wherein the RFI is effectively minimized. Thus cancellation consists of combining groups of signals in such a way that unwanted signals sum to zero. If a radar is subjected to a single source of interference this can be cancelled by using a single auxiliary antenna and combining its output with that of the main antenna such that the interference is of equal amplitude and antiphase. In an adaptive system this is done automatically by sensing the required adjustments and making them appropriately. If there are two sources of interference, a second auxiliary antenna is required An object of the invention is to further effectively minimize RF interference in radar and other receivers. Another object is to remove the unwanted interfering RFI produced by all stations transmitting at any given time, without removing a significant amount of the RF signal that one desires to receive. The invention as defined in the appended claims also relies upon the principles of signal cancellation. In the present invention, the amplitude and phase of each interfering signal, the RFI, is measured and a like signal of equal amplitude and phase is subtracted from the interfering signal to effectively cancel the latter signal. When the radar echo has a wide band characteristic and is short in duration, and the RFI is narrow band and thus longer in duration, a sample of the RFI can be delayed the proper amount and can then be subtracted from the total signal. When the RFI and echo do not meet the foregoing conditions an alternate technique must be employed. In the latter a separate broad band omnidirectional antenna is used to receive the RFI, simultaneously with the principal antenna's reception of both the radar echo and the RFI. The omnidirectional antenna characteristically is relatively insensitive to the radar echo. The RFI signal received via the one antenna is essentially subtracted from the other, reducing the RFI. The echo, which is the desired signal, passes through the filtering and subtraction circuits with only minor modification. More specifically, received RF signals within the receiver's wide band frequency range, that include the persistent interfering RFI, are separated into a plurality of frequency sub-ranges with each spurious signal, preferably, falling into a respective sub-range; a clone signal, derived from the RFI that is delayed the appropriate amount, is obtained for each spurious frequency signal that is essentially equal in amplitude and phase with the amplitude and phase of the associated spurious signal within each respective subrange; the spurious and clone signals are combined to produce corresponding difference signals, effectively canceling corresponding spurious signals, leaving primarily components of the desired radar echo; and the difference signals are recombined to form a composite signal in which any interference signals have been minimized, whereby the combined signal represents essentially only the desired radar echo. The foregoing and additional objects and advantages of the invention together with the structure characteristic thereof, which was only briefly summarized in the foregoing passages, becomes more apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the detailed description of a preferred embodiment, which follows in this specification, taken together with the illustration thereof presented in the accompanying drawings. Fig. 1 illustrates in block diagram and schematic form a radar system containing an embodiment of the RFI elimination circuitry of the invention; Figs. 2a - 2g shows exemplary signal wave shapes that are helpful to an understanding of the operation of the invention; Fig. 3 shows a block diagram of a feedback control circuit for automatically adjusting the phase and gain of the subtracting signal inputted to the subtract input of the subtract circuit in the embodiment of Fig. 1; Fig. 4 is a block diagram of an alternate embodiment of the invention that employs a digital signal processor; Figs. 5a, 5b and 5c illustrate another embodiment in which the RFI elimination is made to the detected signals, instead of at the IF stages as in the embodiment of Fig. 1; and Figs. 6a and 6b illustrate the effect of amplitude subtraction of signals in the embodiment of Fig. 5 when the bandwidth of RFI is only slightly smaller than that of the radar echo. Reference is made to Fig. 1 which partially illustrates a radar system containing the invention in block diagram form. This includes a transmitter 3, TR switch 5, a highly directional antenna 7, a wideband receive 9, and the elements located to the right of TR switch 5. The receiver includes serially connected notch filters 11 and 13, low noise RF wide band amplifier 15, sometimes referred to as the front end tuner, which amplifies inputted RF signals, additional serially connected notch filters, 17 and 19, the downconverter circuits, including mixer 21 and local oscillator 23, which converts the RF signal to the lower intermediate frequencies (IF), and IF amplifier 25, which amplifies the IF signals. The foregoing elements and their assembly are all conventional in radar systems. Antenna 7 serves to transmit each pulse of RF generated by transmitter 3, while TR switch 5 blocks that high power pulse from entering receiver 9. In the interpulse period, the antenna receives any echoes of the transmitted pulse as may be reflected by a reflective object, such as an aircraft. The antenna also picks up RF generated at various frequencies by extraneous sources as may be present, the RFI. Though the antenna is highly directional and thereby minimizes picking up such interference, such antennas typically contain side lobes having lesser sensitivity than the lobe representing the antenna's principal direction, as represented by the dotted pattern in Fig. 1. Thus some RFI may also be picked up by the antenna through those side lobes. Both the radar echo, which may be received for short pulse periods, should a reflecting object be present, and the RFI, which generally persists, are processed in the radar receiver in the customary manner. The RF signals are filtered, amplified, filtered again and inputted to mixer 21, which downconverts that RF to a lower intermediate frequency range, IF, that is outputted from IF amplifier 25. The foregoing is the conventional mode of operation of the radar receiver. Although a purpose of the invention is to minimize or eliminate use of notch filters, in the practical world some notch filters may be required, and, hence, such notch filters are included in the principal embodiment of the invention. Strong and persistent sources of RFI are notch filtered. These notch filters are represented by 11, 13, 17, and 19 in Fig. 1, even though none may be needed. Filters 11 and 13 are for the very strong RFI signals, and these filters are placed before the first amplifier because of the possibility of producing intermodulation frequency components in the first amplifier. RFI signals that are strong, but not very strong, are filtered by notch filters 17 and 19. An attempt should be made to locate the radar where there are no strong RFI signals, but since this is not always practical, and in some case strong RFI can be used as a countermeasure, the principles presented are of particular benefit to both commercial and defense applications. The IF output of amplifier 25 is connected to a frequency range separator formed by a plurality of bandpass filters F1, F2, F3, ... and Fx, wherein the output may be divided or parsed into component frequencies. Each of the band pass filters covers a range of frequencies, defining a frequency channel, and that range differs from the range of frequencies covered by any of the other corresponding band pass filters. In total the bandpass filters and the channels thereby defined complement one another and collectively cover the entire bandwidth or frequency range designed for the radar receiver. The exact number of bandpass filters used is chosen in accordance with the principles described hereafter and depends on how finely one desires to divide up the frequency spectrum. Preferably, each channel should include only one of the interference frequencies as a design goal, although not absolutely necessary. Further the channels need not be of the same increment of frequency range. Thus if some interference sources are close to one another in frequency, while still another source of interference is widely separated in frequency from the foregoing, the frequency spectrum may be divided into small portions to compartmentalize the first sources, while the latter interference source may occupy a large portion that is of a wide frequency range. By the foregoing means, the signals output from the IF amplifier are parsed or compartmentalized into discrete frequency channels defining multiple outputs. The multiple outputs resulting from the frequency separation are applied to corresponding first inputs of subtraction circuits, 27a, b, c ...x, each of which is associated with an output of a respective bandpass filter. The output of band pass filter F1 is connected to a first input of a subtract circuit 27a; that of F2 is connected to subtract circuit 27b; and so on, as illustrated, through band pass filter Fx connected to subtract circuit 27x. Each of the subtract circuits contains a second input to supply the respective subtracting signals. To form separate clone signals a receiving antenna 8 that is essentially omnidirectional in its reception characteristic receives RF that propagates to the antenna from virtually any direction, as represented by the circular pattern in dash lines, and applies the RF to Receiver 10. In turn the receiver outputs the amplified and heterodyned signal which is applied to the inputs of the various bandpass filters F1, F2, F3... Fx as from antenna 7, which divide the frequency spectrum constituting that signal into various channels. Incoming signals received by the omnidirectional antenna are thus parsed into the appropriate frequency channel F1 throught Fx. A line length adjust 16x and an amplitude adjust circuit 14x are connected in series between the output of bandpass filter Fx and output 12x; like line length adjust circuits and amplitude adjust circuits 14a and 16a, 14b and 16b, and so on are connected in series between the respective bandpass filters and the associated one of the outputs 12a, 12b and so on. To complete the embodiment, the foregoing elements are connected to the subtractor circuits 27, each being connected to the second or subtracting input of a respective one of the subtractor circuits 27a, 27b ... 27x. In such an arrangement the RF interference is incident not only on directional antenna 7, but on omnidirectional antenna 8 as well, perhaps slightly displaced in phase depending on the relative location of the two antennas. The directional antenna 7 and the omnidirectional antenna 8 should be physically near each other to minimize the phase differences in each common RFI signal. For example, the omnidirectional antenna can be just one element of a phased array, or it can be a small omnidirectional antenna attached to a directional parabolic antenna that rotates. By mounting the secondary antenna on or very near the principal antenna, the phase difference between the two antennas is minimized. In practice, the main concern is with any RFI that is picked up in the main and side lobes of the principal radar antenna. When the means of Fig. 1 is used to generate the RFI signals for subtraction, each frequency channel should contain no more than one RFI signal. The reason for such condition is that a different delay is needed for each direction of RFI arrival. With the embodiment of Fig. 1, it is possible to have only one frequency channel, though this is not optimum. Amplitude adjust circuit 14x is a variable gain amplifier whose output level during interpulse intervals is made equal to the amplitude of the principal antenna input to the subtract circuit, so that the difference signal outputted by the subtract circuit during that interval is essentially zero. The line length adjust 16x performs a delay function, except that the gross delay produced is only sufficient to match the difference in the delay times of the two receiving systems. It accounts for the placement of the auxiliary antenna and for difference in delay caused by use of two separate receivers, whose characteristics may differ slightly from one another. The omnidirectional antenna may also receive radar echoes, but the power level of those echoes is very low since the antenna is not designed for receiving those echoes. Thus in producing the clone signals of existing RFI, the radar echo strength is negligible and may be disregarded. As those skilled in the art appreciate, and putting aside consideration of the succeeding amplifier 31 and adder 33 elements illustrated in the Fig. 1, were one to combine the outputs of the subtractor circuits for the individual channels, in the absence of a received radar echo, the combined signal should be minimal, since all of the RFI has been cancelled out. However, during the presence of the radar echo, those outputs should combine to reproduce that echo. Radar waveforms and hence radar echoes may be of varying bandwidths ranging typically from 1 KHz to 1000 MHz. The range resolution is inversely related to the bandwidth. And the probability of RFI increases with bandwidth. The waveform bandwidth must be encompassed by the range of frequency channels indicated by Fl through Fx in Fig. 1. When the echo is processed by the receiver, the path taken by the echo will include as many of the frequency channels as needed. In each of the channels, the RFI occurring in that channel is subtracted from the signal formed of the RFI and the part of the echo occurring in that channel. It may be noted that, theoretically, the RFI could possibly change over the delay period, and the radio transmitter causing the RFI could even turn off. In practice, a significant variation in the RFI amplitude is unlikely, because the delay period is very short, of the order of 1 to 100 microseconds and is of the same order of duration as that of the radar pulse, and the bandwidth of the RFI is small. The decay time of the RFI is the reciprocal of the bandwidth. Subtractor circuits 27 are preferably formed of conventional differential amplifiers, which is basic to the subtraction scheme. The differential amplifier's output is the difference of the two inputs. This difference signal is also amplified a given amount by the differential amplifier, but such amplification is not of great importance to the present application and is only incidental. Such amplifiers are highly developed and are available in many forms, including the form of small plug-in semiconductor chips. And while the foregoing subtract circuit employs a differential amplifier to make the subtraction, equivalent circuits may be used. As example an adder may be substituted in which case the two input signals should be of the same amplitude and one hundred and eighty degrees out of phase, whereby the adder effectively subtracts the two signals. The multiple difference signals obtained from the subtractor circuits are each amplified by the respective associated amplifiers 31a, 31b, ... 31x, which are gain controlled amplifiers discussed in greater detail hereafter, and are recombined into a single signal by a conventional adder circuit 33. The gain of each amplifier depends upon the RFI, or noise, that leaked through the previous circuits and appears at the input to the respective amplifier. The gain of each amplifier decreases when the RFI noise at its input increases. Adder 33, which may be called a combiner, is of known design and may be formed of a simple resistive lattice. The adder recombines the various spectral components of the signal forming the radar echo, as was parsed between the various channels earlier, and now separately applied to the adder's multiple inputs, into a single broadband corrected signal, thereby reproducing the radar echo. The outputs of each of the amplifiers 31 is connected to a respective one of the adder's multiple inputs. The output of the adder, representing a composite of the signals applied at its input, is then applied to the remaining receiver circuits, generally indicated by block 35, and, ultimately, the corrected signal is displayed on a display device 37, such as a cathode ray tube, presenting the radar echo substantially with little or no presentation of the RFI. The Amplifiers 31, that precede the adder, have gains controlled by the noise and RFI levels in the respective channels. The gain of each amplifier depends upon the RFI, or noise, that leaked through the previous circuits and appears at the input to the respective amplifier. The RFI that leaked through might be due to a new broadband interfering station or the failure of one of the difference amplifiers. This possibility must be guarded against, and that is served by variable gain amplifiers 31a through 31x. The gain of each of these amplifiers is set to be inversely proportional to the square of the RFI and noise power present at its input with adjustments for bandwidth. The design of such amplifiers is known, and need not be described here in detail. The purpose of the delay circuit associated with each of amplifiers 31 is to provide a sample of the average noise-plus RFI level when an echo signal is not present. When all preceding circuits perform as designed and when there are no new interfering stations, the amplifiers 31 are not needed. These amplifiers in effect weigh the individual contributions to the total signal sum presented on the output device 37. For example, when a new interfering station appears and the RFI leaks through the previous circuits, the amplifier 31 in that channel will have a low gain so that the effect of the new station is minimal. After all receiving channels have been corrected with the RFI subtractions, each channel is amplified by amplifiers 31 and the outputs of those amplifiers are then recombined at Adder 33, which outputs the corrected signal. To illustrate the effect of the variable gain amplifier 31, a hypothetical case involving three channels of RF is shown in the seven plots of Fig. 2. These plots are short-time snapshots of the signals at IF at various points in the circuit. The waveforms presented in Fig. 2 illustrate the effects of the difference circuit 27 and the variable gain amplifier 31 of Fig. 1 and the result expected from the operation of an embodiment that includes only three frequency channels, Fl, F2, and F3, amongst which to parse the signal. The radar echo is in these three channels, along with an RFI signal in each channel. The curve in Fig. 2a is the total signal received including echo plus RFI as appears at the output of IF amplifier 25. Note the amplitude scale. All scales in Fig. 2 are proportional to volts and are mutually consistent. Fig. 2b shows the echo signal, only, at the output of the adder, 33, and after the subtractor circuits 27a, 27b, and 27c have removed the RFI in accordance with the invention. Figs. 2c and 2d show the RFI and the echo component, respectively, in channel F3 before application to associated subtractor circuit 27c. In particular in this example, it is assumed that difference circuit 27c fails to subtract the delayed signal for some reason. In this case the gain of amplifier 31c is decreased a certain amount to increase the optimum signal to noise ratio at the output of the adder. This hypothetical example is described in the following paragraphs. Fig. 2e shows the sum of the echoes, only, in channels F1 and F2. This represents the output of adder 33, less some residual noise, when channel F3 is disconnected. Figs. 2f and 2g show the RFI and the echo component, respectively, in channel F3 at the output of amplifier 31c when subtractor 27c fails to function for some reason or when delay 29c is disconnected. These two figures should be compared with Figs. 2c and 2d to see the effect of the variable gain circuit 31c. The gain of amplifier 31c in this situation is controlled by the level of RFI signal shown in Fig. 2c. In this hypothetical case, when the RFI in channel F3 was not removed by the associated subtractor circuit, the output of the adder would be the sum of the signals in Figs. 2e, 2f, and 2g, and the signal-to-noise power ratio would be 6.2, which is optimum for this case. A specific adjustable subtract circuit useful in the embodiment of Fig. 1 is illustrated in Fig. 3. This adjustment circuit is a feedback circuit that causes the signal output at the output, C, of differential amplifier 27 to be a minimum at all times when a radar echo is not being received. Referencing Fig. 3, the subtract circuit formed of differential amplifier 27, having inputs A and B, the subtract inputs, and output C, and the variable phase circuit 14 and variable gain circuit, which were earlier described, are illustrated. A timing and control line from the radar timing circuits controls the opening and closing of switch 45 and controls compare circuits 41. A sample and hold circuit 43 provides signals for circuit 41 which in turn controls the level of delay introduced by variable delay circuit 29. Sample-and-hold circuit 43, with an input time constant of 10 to 100 periods of the intermediate frequency, IF, samples the signal from the output, C, of differential amplifier 27. An incremental change in phase or amplitude is then made and an identical sample-and-hold circuit samples output C again. The two levels held by the sample-and-hold circuits are compared in a DC difference amplifier as forms part of the compare and logic circuits 41. Another incremental change is made in the direction to decrease the output C level, and this is determined by which of the two samples is larger. The first sample-and-hold circuit is dumped and another sample is taken and the process repeated. The sample-and-hold circuits, comparison circuits, the logic circuits, and phase and amplitude changing circuits are state of the art and require no further description. The magnitude of the incremental change in phase or amplitude may be constant or variable. If constant, the magnitude should be small and reflect the error that can be tolerated in the subtraction circuit. If variable, the magnitude should be proportional to the difference in the two sampled levels, but should be no more than ten times the error that can be tolerated. The chopper, Ch, in Fig. 3 allots part of the time to the variable gain circuit and part of the time to the variable phase circuit, so that gain and phase adjustments are alternately adjusted for greater accuracy. The variable circuit shown in Fig.3 is initially adjusted manually. Even in the best electronics, gain and delay changes occur with time. These changes are often due to temperature changes. When the RFI is from a transmitter on a vehicle or airplane the phase in the omnidirectional-antenna channel changes relative to that in the radar channel. For those reasons the variable gain and variable phase circuits in Fig. 3 are desirable. The feedback from output C of differential amplifier 27 controls the variable delay and variable gain circuits to force the output level at C to be a minimum. The resulting gains and phase shifts then are proper. Switch 45 is open only when the radar transmitter is transmitting or when a radar pulse is being received. This fraction of time is typically less than 10 per cent of the total time. So for most of the time, the variable circuits are being adjusted. In operation, a radar system's transmitter generates and radiates the radar pulse. After the lapse of a predetermined period thereafter, the radar system then gates its associated receiver to the "on" condition for another interval to listen for any radar echoes returned to the radar system during that interval, referred to as the "receive window". The receiver is then gated off as the system prepares to generate the next radar pulse. This sequence is repeated continuously. Modern radar systems are computer controlled and all such functions and intervals are controlled by the radar's computer. The radar system's timing circuits provide a signal that is used to control feedback circuits 47 via lead 46. Included in the feedback circuits is switch 45, which is normally closed. Switch 45 is open during transmitter pulsing and for a short period thereafter. It is also open during the receive gate when the radar echo is expected. The receiver is on and connected to the antenna at all times, except during transmitter pulsing plus a settling time thereafter. When switch 45 is closed the feedback circuits are being adjusted. This cycle of transmitting, receiving, and feedback adjusting is repeated over and over as the radar searches and tracks. While the foregoing circuit has been described in connection with a radar system, as those skilled in the art recognize, it may also be applied in a pulse communication system as well. In the case of a communications receiver, the adjustment circuit of Fig. 3 operates only at preselected times. The frequency of operation of the feedback adjustment circuit for communication receivers depends upon the type of interference. An adjustment time of 0.1 second out of every 10 seconds should suffice for some cases of RFI. In the case of a communication receiver, the open time of switch 45 may be as much as 99 percent. The variable delay and variable gain circuits are continually adjusted during the times when the radar echo or a radio communication system transmission is absent. Although the foregoing embodiments employ essentially analog type circuits, as those skilled in the art recognize still other embodiments may employ equivalent digital circuit elements to accomplish those functions. As example, a still additional embodiment of the invention is illustrated in Fig. 5 to which reference is made. This embodiment uses an analog-to-digital converter 55 to convert the analog signal from IF amplifier 25 to digital values or numbers, a Fourier transformer 56 which parses the numbers amongst the various ranges of digital data representing increments of the frequency range, and a digital processor represented in dash lines 58. The digital system of Fig. 4 may be compared with the analog system of Fig. 1. Both systems are identical in structure up through the IF Amplifier 25. Corresponding elements of Fig. 4 perform the same functions as in Fig. 1, but digital numbers rather than analog signals are used for the processing. For example, the subtractor circuit 27x of Fig. 1 is just a subtraction of two numbers in a computer as indicated by 57x in Fig. 4. The Adder 63 sums several weighted numbers to produce the composite output signal, which in this embodiment is represented by a number or a series of numbers. The weighting for each channel is accomplished by the multipliers 61. The delays represented by 59 and 60 are more easily accomplished in the digital domain than the analog. Delay 59 is adjustable to the same end as in the preceding analog embodiments by a feedback control loop, not illustrated. When RFI is being received and in the absence of the radar echo, the digital control loop checks the output of subtract circuit 57 and adjusts the delay until the difference being outputted is at a minimum. These digital processes are well known by one experienced in radar and digital signal processing, and more detailed descriptions are not necessary. The elimination of RFI is functionally the same for the digital system as for the analog system. There are many ways to implement a digital system. Fig. 4 illustrates the principle and represents one implementation. The Fourier transformer divides the echo spectrum into the individual bands that are needed such as F1, F2, F3, ... Fx. The signals in these bands are digitally detected by the transformer 56 so that subsequent phase adjustment is not needed as for Fig. 1. The subtraction circuits 57x perform amplitude subtraction only. When there is no RFI in a channel, such as the F2 channel in Fig. 4, there is no need for subtraction. The blocks 64 are labels showing the frequency channels. Outputs 65 of the adjustment circuits may be used elsewhere in the processor. This is indicated by the arrows 66. The preceding description was for signal subtractions that occur at the IF, intermediate frequency, stage, which was illustrated in Fig. 1. For subtractions at IF, both the phase and amplitude of the correcting signal must be proper; that is, they must match the phase and amplitude of the RFI component of the IF signal to be subtracted. Another arrangement, illustrated in Figs. 5a through 5c, involves a subtraction of detected signals which involve amplitude only. For this latter arrangement, the phase is nonexistent and the subtraction process is less complex. There may be only one frequency channel instead of the plurality of frequency channels as was used in the embodiment of Fig. 1. Such arrangement, however, has an inherent disadvantage. The phase information is lost, which, in turn, means that Doppler shifts of the target or parts of the target cannot be measured. Further, the target cannot be imaged. It remains possible to measure target velocity, however, by noting the change in range for successive received pulses. For some radars, such as a search radar, the arrangement illustrated by Fig. 5 would be useful and much simpler to implement than the embodiment of Fig. 1. Fig. 5a shows an IF amplifier 10 followed by a detector 70. The output of detector 70 is a fluctuating direct current voltage. An example of this voltage is shown in the top trace 88 of Fig. 6a. A subtractor circuit, consisting of operational amplifier 87 and delay circuit 83, follows the detector 70 in Fig. 5a. The delay is set prior to operation and is equal in duration to the length of the received pulse plus the expected length of the largest target. The delay time in this arrangement is not as critical as for the IF subtraction case of Fig. 1. An example of the output of operational amplifier 87, which produces a difference signal, is shown as the lower trace 89 in Fig. 6a. The ideal output is illustrated by pulses 84 and 85 in Fig. 5a. The second pulse, 85, is either gated out, using conventional circuitry not illustrated, or is ignored by the operator. Occasionally during operation, a signal may appear such as at B in the bottom curve 89 of Fig. 6a that could be confused with the real echo. A verification pulse subsequently transmitted by the radar will serve to eliminate such spurious echoes. A somewhat improved arrangement is shown as Fig. 5b, though a separate broad beam antenna and receiver are needed. In this case the RFI occurring at the time of pulse reception presented at detector 70' is subtracted at differential amplifier 72 from the output of detector 70 to produce output 81 which is illustrated by pulse 86. That output is also illustrated in Fig. 6b as trace 91. Trace 90 in Fig. 6b represents the output of the detector 70 in Fig. 5b. The delays in the radar antenna channel and in the broad beam antenna channel must be set approximately equal at the time of construction, and there is no need for continual delay adjustment as for the cases of Fig. 1. There is a need in most cases for a continual adjustment of the amplitude of the omnidirectional antenna signal. This adjustment occurs in the variable amplifier or attenuator 93, which in turn is controlled by the feedback circuit 92, which consists of a switch and sample, integrate, and hold circuits. Radar timing signals, obtained from the associated radar circuitry, not illustrated, controls the sampling time and sampling period. It also controls the resetting of the hold circuits. The sign of the voltage out of feedback circuit 92, positive or negative polarity, determines whether the gain of amplifier 93 is increased or decreased. This control is such as to force the voltage at 81 to be zero when no radar echo is present. When a radar echo could be present, the difference output 81 is not sampled by feedback circuit 92. A small amount of echo signal will be received by the broad beam antenna, but its power level will typically be 0.01 to 0.00001 as large as the echo signal received by the high gain radar antenna. In an alternative, the circuit arrangement of Fig. 1 may be modified by replacing each channel with a circuit constructed in accordance with Fig. 5b, whereby the latter circuit is duplicated in number to equal the number of channels in those arrangements. In this case Doppler information is not lost and imaging is possible, and RFI elimination still occurs. A somewhat better arrangement, one not requiring a separate antenna, is illustrated by Fig. 5c. This arrangement takes samples of the RFI just before and just after the arrival of the desired radar pulse. One half of each of these two samples is subtracted from the output of detector 70 to produce output 82 which is illustrated as pulses 76, 77, and 78. Pulses 77 and 78 are one half the amplitude of pulse 76 and are either time gated out or ignored by the operator. The advantage of this scheme is a more accurate sample of RFI at the time of pulse reception than that illustrated by Fig. 5a. In Fig. 5c note that a signal level equal one half the signal level occurring before the echo pulse plus one half the signal level occurring after the echo pulse is subtracted from the signal level at the time of the echo pulse. For this process the attenuator 74 reduces the subtract signals by one half, and delays 71 and 75 provide the needed delays. One experienced in the art will realize that these functions can be implemented either in analog fashion or in digital fashion. As in the prior embodiments, a digital system can also be defined and made to perform the same functions analogous to and as illustrated by the circuits of Figs. 5a, 5b and 5c, previously described. In such a digital system case, the Fourier transformer 56 and adder 63, found in the digital system of Fig. 4, are not needed, so there is just one broadband channel. Digital functions handle the processes as illustrated by Figs. 5 which were previously described.

Claims: Radar apparatus for transmitting and receiving a train of pulsed RF signals comprising a transmitter (3), a directional antenna (7), a receiver (9) coupled to said antenna for receiving therefrom and detecting a total signal occurring within a predefined pass band comprising an echo of a transmitted RF pulse signal and any radio frequency interference (RFI) present within said pass band and echos reflected from a reflecting surface on which said pulsed RF signals are incident, and a signal processor for receiving and processing RF echoes during the presence of RFI, said signal processor including circuit means for reducing the effect of said RFI in the received detected signal, characterized by further comprising: means for determining the amplitude of the detected RFI existing at the time of echo reception, including means for sampling and averaging the RFI occurring during a first short time interval prior to reception of a desired echo signal and a second short time interval subsequent to reception of said desired echo signal, and delay means for delaying the sampled signals for a third predetermined time interval equal to the time between the completion of said sampling to the next reception of RFI that follows shortly the next received echo, and means for subtracting the amplitude of said detected RFI from the amplitude of the total detected signal to produce a difference signal representative of the desired echo, whereby said RFI is substantially eliminated. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said means for determining the amplitude of the detected RFI existing at the time of echo reception, comprises: broad beam antenna means (8) for receiving RFI separately from any RFI received with said echo at said directional antenna means (7); and means for adjusting the level of RFI received at said broad beam antenna to be equal to that received at said directional antenna.

Inventors: BLACKMON JAMES BERTRAM, JAMES JESSE CLOPTON, BLACKMON, JAMES BERTRAM, JAMES, JESSE CLOPTON
Applicants: MC DONNELL DOUGLAS CORP, MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION
Application year: 1995
Main classification: G01S7
IPC codes: G01S7, G01S13