END MILL HAVING HIGH AND LOW HELICAL FLUTES

Abstract: An end mill tool has two distinct sets of flutes, a low-helical angle set of two-or-more primary flutes (210) and a high-helical angle set of two-or-more secondary flutes (220, 222, 224, 226). At positions on the body of the tool where these two sets of flutes intersect, a plurality of discrete cutting edges (240, 242, 244, 246) are formed.

Description: END MILL HAVING HIGH AND LOW HELICAL FLUTES TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to machining a workpiece and, more particularly, to end-mill tools for milling a workpiece. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Rotary cutting end-mill tools are used for performing machining operations (milling) workpieces, including forming slots, keyways, pockets, and the like. Several considerations related to end-mill tool design include time for completing a machining operation (process) , amount of material removed in a cut, quality of the cut, and wear on the tool itself during the milling operation. Among the machine operations performed with an end-mill tool include "roughing" (rough cutting) , wherein material is removed from a workpiece at a relatively high rate (e.g., depth of cut) , but with a relatively rough surface finish, and "finishing", wherein material is removed from a workpiece at a relatively low rate, but with a relatively smooth surface finish. Generally, these two operations (roughing and finishing) are antithetical to one another, and require two operations with two different end-mills. The materials from which end-mill tools are formed include tungsten carbide, high speed steel, ceramic, and other advanced materials and coatings. A end-mill tool typically includes a "shank" portion, a "body" portion and a "point". The shank portion, towards one end of the end-mill tool, is generally cylindrical (but may be tapered) for engaging by a spindle of a milling machine which, in use, will drive (rotate) the end-mill tool. The body portion of the end-mill tool is located between the shank and the point. The point is formed at an opposite end of the tool from the shank portion, and typically includes one or more cutting edges. To manufacturing an end-mill tool, a grinder is typically used to grind a flute face and a corresponding cutting edge on the body of the end-mill tool. The grind (grinding operation) typically starts from an "inception location" (a position on the tool at or near the interface of the body portion and the shank portion) on the body portion of the tool and ends at the point of the tool. The grind will create a desired helical flute face and/or helical cutting edge. Prior art end-mills typically have continuous helical flutes with continuous helical cutting edges extending from the inception location to the point (or vice-versa) . Generally, the flutes are employed for chip removal, in a manner similar to the helical flutes on an ordinary drill bit. Variations of the grind (e.g., flute angle) have been attempted to improve the tool design. Prior art improvements to material removal and feed rate of end-mill cutters have been accomplished by (1) varying the spiral lead angle; (2) increasing the depth of the flutes in the body portion of the end-mill, (3) changing the radial rake; (4) changing the clearance angles of the cutting edges; and (5) forming chip splitting grooves in the flutes. These prior art variations may weaken the core diameter of the end-mill cutter, thereby weakening the tool, or are not suitable for a particular application (e.g., regarding milling time, rough cut, finish cut, etc.). The following U.S. Patents are incorporated by reference herein as being instructive of the prior art: 4,610,581 (discussing helix pitch angles of from 10° to 30°); 5,049,009; 4,721,421 (specifically discussing chip-breakers); and 4,963,059. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an improved end-mill tool. It is another object of the present invention to provide an end-mill tool suitable for roughing and finishing a workpiece in one (combined) operation. According to the invention, an end-mill tool includes: a shank for engaging the end-mill tool to a rotating device (e.g., a spindle); a point for plunging said tool into a workpiece to a desired depth; a body portion located intermediate said shank and said point, said body portion having two distinct sets of flutes, a low-helical angle set of one-or-more primary flutes and a high- helical angle set of one-or-more secondary flutes intersecting the primary flutes. At positions on the body of the tool where these two sets of flutes intersect, a plurality of discrete cutting edges are formed. This allows for a high rate of chip removal. In one exemplary embodiment of the invention, the end-mill tool has two primary flutes at a low helical angle (e.g., 15°), and has four secondary flutes at a high-helical angle (e.g., 65°) . In another exemplary embodiment of the invention, the end- mill tool has three primary flutes at a low helical angle (e.g., 15°) , and has four secondary flutes at a high-helical angle (e.g., 65°). In another exemplary embodiment of the invention, the end- mill tool has four primary flutes at a low helical angle (e.g. , 15°) , and has four or eight secondary flutes at a high-helical angle (e.g. , 65°) . According to an aspect of the invention, the intersection of the high-helical secondary flutes and the low-helical primary flutes results in a plurality of discrete, spaced-apart low- helical leading-edge cutting edges disposed along the body portion of the end-mill tool. According to an aspect of the invention, the intersection of the high-helical secondary flutes and the low-helical primary flutes also results in a plurality of high-helical angle helical cutting edges disposed along the body portion of the end-mill tool. Various relationships between the helical angles of the primary and secondary flutes, as well as the axial extent (LI) of the discrete, spaced-apart low-helical angle leading-edge cutting edges in relationship to the axial extent (L2) of the high-helical angle helical cutting edges are disclosed. The end-mill of the present invention allows for roughing and finishing in one machine operation. Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent in light of the description that follows. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1A is a side of a" generic" end-mill tool, representative of the prior art. Figure IB is an end view of the end-mill tool of Figure 1A. Figure 2A is a side view of the end-mill of the present invention, detailing the helical flute face of the end-mill. Figure 2B is a side view of the end-mill of the present invention, from a different perspective than the view of Figure 2A, detailing the helical cutting edge of the end-mill. 2A. Figure 2C is an end view of the end-mill of Figure 1A. Figures 3A and 3B are end views, illustrating alternate embodiments of the end-mill of the present invention. Detailed Description of the Invention Figures 1A and IB show a "generic" end-mill tool 100, representative of the end-mill tools of the prior art. The tool is generally a cylinder (rod stock) that has been ground to form distinctive portions. At one end of the tool 100 is a shank portion 102, suitable for chucking to the spindle of a milling machine (not shown) for rotating and advancing the tool 100. At an other end of the tool 100 is a point 104 which is provided with flat cutting edges 114 and 116. Between the shank portion 102 and the point 104 is a body portion 106 which is helically ground to have a number of "primary" flutes 110 and 112. A "boundary" between the body portion 106 and the shank portion 102 is designated 108 in the drawing. Regarding forming flutes in the body portion 106, generally this involves grinding two channels, or "primary" flutes 110 and 112 from two diametrically-opposed positions at the point 104 towards the shank portion 102, stopping the grinding at the boundary 108 of the body portion 106 and the shank portion 102. (The direction of the grind could, of course, be reversed.) For a three-flute end-mill, there would be three primary flutes winding helically around the body portion of the tool and terminating in three primary cutting edges.) Generally, the location of the flat cutting edges 114 and 116 is determined by the location of the flutes 110 and 112 at the point 104 of the tool 100. The end-mill tool 100 illustrated in Figure 1A has two primary cutting edges 114 and 116 at the point, which is common. Figure IB shows the primary cutting edges 114 and 116 in greater detail. Evidently, since each of the primary flutes has a depth (radially into the body portion) , this results in a greatly reduced diameter ("core diameter") of the tool at various points along the body portion of the tool, and the strength of the tool is consequently reduced accordingly. For purposes of this discussion, the flutes determining the location (and number) of primary cutting edges at the point of the tool are termed "primary" flutes. These primary flutes are typically formed at a helical angle (that the helix "winds" around the cylindrical body portion) . For purposes of this discussion, a "low-helix" (or low- helical flute) is a flute that helically "winds" around a cylinder at an angle of no more than 45° degrees (forty-five degrees), including no more than 40°, 35°, 30°, 25°, 20°, 15°, 10° and 5°. A "super" low-helical flute would be a flute that winds around a cylinder at an angle of at no more than 15°. As a practical matter, given that a helical flute has a finite width (measured axially along the tool) , it is impractical to have a very shallow angle (e.g., 5°) low-helical flute. For purposes of this discussion, a "high-helix" (or high- helical flute) is a flute that helically winds around a cylinder at an angle of greater than 45°, including greater than 50°, 55°, 60°, 65°, 70°, 75°, 80°, and 85°. A "super" high-helical flute would be a flute that winds around a cylinder at an angle of at least 65 ° . Although the end-mill tool of Figures 1A and IB has been described as having "primary" flutes, this does not necessarily imply that the prior art suggests or teaches an end-mill tool having "secondary" flutes. Further, in the discussion that follows, no priority of function is meant to be attributed to the terms "primary" and "secondary". These terms are used for labelling purposes only. Returning to Figure 1A, it is evident that two "secondary" cutting edges 120 and 122 are formed, each of which are helical, following the primary flutes 110 and 112, helically around the body portion of the end-mill tool. A notable feature of these secondary cutting edges 120 and 122 is that they are "continuous" - in other words they extend continuously from the point to the shank. These secondary cutting edges come into play during a machining operation when the end-mill is "buried" into a workpiece, and remove material in the linear direction of travel of the end-mill (e.g., from right-to-left, as viewed in Figure 1A) . Material removed from the workpiece will tend to be in the form of an elongated helical (curlicue) chip, and will be guided away from the workpiece by the channels formed by the flutes. By way of further definition, the primary edges 114 and 116 at the point of the tool can be considered to be "flat" cutting edges, and the secondary cutting edges 120 and 122 along the body of the tool can be considered to be "helical" cutting edges. According to the invention, it is advantageous when performing an end-mill machining operation to create many small chips, rather than fewer elongated curlicue chips. This allows, for example, in a rapid rate of removal of material from a workpiece, without undue heating of the end-mill tool. Heat is generally anathema to tools, particularly end-mill tools. To the end of reducing heat, it is known to use coolants. Dry machining (sans coolant) offers an advantage of simplicity. Generally, the end-mill of the present invention provides for increased rate of removal without sacrificing tool life and strength, and may not require flowing coolant onto the workpiece or tool. Generally according to the invention, these objects are achieved by having two distinct sets of flutes, a low-helical angle set of primary flutes and a high-helical angle set of secondary flutes intersecting the primary flutes. At points of intersection, discrete secondary cutting edges are formed to facilitate chip removal from a workpiece. This allows for a high rate of chip removal. First Embodiment of the Invention According to an embodiment of the invention, an end-mill tool is formed to have two primary flutes forming two primary (flat) cutting edges at the point of the end-mill tool, and to have four "secondary" flutes forming a plurality of discrete secondary cutting edges along the body of the tool. As will be evident in the discussion that follows, the secondary cutting edges each have a low-helical leading-edge portion and a high- helical trailing-edge portion. Generally, a leading edge is determined by the direction of rotation of the tool. Figures 2A and 2B are two side views of an embodiment of the end-mill 200 of the present invention, taken ninety (circumferential) degrees from one another. Figure 2C is an end view of the end-mill of Figures 2A and 2B. As will become evident, this embodiment is termed a "2x4" embodiment, since it has two primary flutes and four secondary flutes. As in the prior art, the end-mill tool 200 has a shank portion 202, a point 204 and a body portion 206. The end-mill has two primary flutes 210 and 212 extending from the point towards the shank portion (only one of the flutes is visible in the view of Figure 2A) . The primary flutes 210 and 212 are formed (e.g. , ground in to the body portion of the tool) at a relatively shallow helical angle, preferably 15° which, according to the definitions set forth above is a super low-helical angle. At the point 204 of the tool 200, the two primary flutes 210 and 212 form two flat (primary) cutting edges 214 and 216. The end-mill has four secondary flutes 220, 222, 224 and 226 winding helically around the body portion at a different helical angle than and intersecting the two primary flutes 210 and 212. The four secondary flutes originate from four evenly- spaced virtual points around the circumference of the point, and terminate at four evenly-spaced virtual points around the circumference of the body portion (e.g., at the intersection of the body portion and the shank portion) . Preferably, the secondary flutes are all at the same helical angle as one another. However, they could be at different angles than one another. At the intersection of the four secondary flutes and one of the primary flutes (210) , at least four compound cutting surfaces (faces) 230, 232, 234 and 236 are formed. (More than four cutting surfaces may be formed, depending on the axial length of the primary flutes, and how many times the secondary flutes wind around the body.) In a similar manner, at the intersection of the four secondary flutes and the other of the primary flutes (212) , at least four compound cutting surfaces are formed. The compound cutting surfaces, and the various cutting edges determined thereby, are discussed in greater detail hereinbelow. The primary flutes 210 and 212 are formed (e.g., ground in to the body portion of the tool) at a relatively low helical angle, preferably 15° which, according to the definitions set forth above is a super low-helical angle. The secondary flutes 220, 222, 224 and 226 are formed (e.g., ground in to the body portion of the tool) at a relatively high-helical angle, preferably 65° which, according to the definitions set forth above is a super high-helical angle. The secondary flutes preferably intersect the primary flutes at an angle of at least 45°. In a preferred embodiment (as shown and described hereinabove) , the primary flutes (at an angle of 15°) intersect the secondary flutes (at an angle of 65 ° ) at an angle of 50 ° . Generally, in order to form the tool 200, grinding of a tool blank (rod) is required, as follows: (1) grind a first low-helical primary flute into the body portion; (2) grind a second low-helical primary flute into the body portion; (3) grind a first high-helical secondary flute into the body portion; (4) grind a second high-helical secondary flute into the body portion; (5) grind a third high-helical secondary flute into the body portion; (6) grind a fourth high-helical secondary flute into the body portion; (7) grind various cutting reliefs on the secondary flutes to form the various secondary cutting edges; (8) grind a number of clearance relief angles behind the cutting reliefs on the secondary cutting edges; (9) grind a gash point on the point of the tool; and (10) grind reliefs and clearances at the point to form the primary cutting edges. As mentioned above, the cutting surfaces 230, 232, 234, 236 form a plurality of compound cutting edges. More particularly, a plurality of discrete low-helical angle, leading-edge cutting edges 240, 242, 244 and 246 are formed. These cutting edges 240, 242, 244, 246 are disposed at the intersection of the secondary flutes and a primary flute, and are disposed at a low- helical angle (e.g., 15°) which is determined by the helical angle of the primary flutes (210, 212). Inasmuch as the angle of the leading-edge cutting edges is determined by the primary flutes, they are considered to be "low-helical" cutting edges. In addition to the low-helical angle, leading-edge cutting edges 240, 242, 244, 246, a plurality of high-helical angle, trailing-edge cutting edges 250, 252, 254 and 256 are formed, each of which originates from the top of a respective low- helical, leading-edge cutting edge (e.g., 240) and winds helically around the body portion. These cutting edges 250, 252, 254, 256 are disposed at the interface of a cutting surface 230, 232, 234, 236 and a respective secondary flute, and are disposed at a high-helical angle (e.g., 65°) which is determined by the helical angle (β) of the secondary flutes. Inasmuch as the helical cutting edges the secondary flutes, they are considered to be "high-helical" cutting edges. As mentioned above, each cutting edge is provided with a cutting relief and with a clearance relief behind the cutting relief. An important feature of the present invention is that the cutting reliefs of the low-helical cutting edges (e.g. , 240) "run into" (intersect, and are contiguous with) the cutting reliefs of the high-helical cutting edges (e.g. , 250) . Likewise, the clearance reliefs of the low-helical cutting edges (e.g., 240) run into the clearance reliefs of the high-helical cutting edges (e.g., 250). The helical cutting edges 250, 252, 254, 256 have an axial dimension (as measured along the axis of the tool blank) , from a one edge to the next, of a dimension L2. This dimension is of interest, and is discussed in greater detail hereinbelow. The axial (vis-a-vis the tool axis) extent of the leading- edge cutting edges (e.g., 240, 242, 244, 246) are each of a dimension LI. This dimension is of interest, and is discussed in greater detail hereinbelow. As mentioned above, the helical angle of the primary flutes is preferably low, on the order of 15°, and the helical angle of the secondary flutes is preferably high, on the order of 65°. An important feature of the invention is that the low- helical angle cutting edge (e.g., 240) and associated (e.g., on the same flute surface) high-helical angle cutting edge (e.g., 250) form a contiguous "compound" helical cutting edge of dimension L1+L2 for improved chip removal. The axial dimension L2 of the high-helical cutting edges (e.g., 250) will remove a chip (material removed from the workpiece) having a length determined by the radial length of the cutting edge. Depending on the rotational speed of the tool 200, chips cut from a work piece will vary in size and contribute to material removal rate and milling time. The secondary cutting edges cutting edges (e.g., 240, 250) may remove either one chip corresponding to axial length L1+L2 (e.g., conventional speed milling), or two separate chips corresponding to axial length L2 (from the high-helical cutting edges) and axial length LI (from the low-helical cutting edges) , respectively, and is especially well adapted to high speed milling operations. For example, in a high-speed milling operation, chip splitting will occur in that the secondary cutting edges (e.g., 240, 250) will split distinct chips from both the high-helical cutting edge (e.g., 250) and from the low-helical cutting edge (e.g., 240). The splitting of the chip will occur at the intersection (corner) of the high-helical cutting edge and the low-helical cutting edge. Chips cut from the high-helical cutting edge will "flow" through the respective adjacent (next higher, towards the shank) high-helical flute (e.g., 220, 222, 224, 226), and chips cut from the low-helical cutting edge (e.g., 240, 242, 244, 246) will flow through the associated low helical flute (e.g., 210 or 212). At conventional cutting speeds, the low and high helical cutting edges (e.g., 240, 250) will remove one chip (without chip splitting) having a length corresponding to the sum of the axial dimensions (L1+L2) . Thus, for machining at conventional speeds, it may be desirable to incorporate chip splitting (breaking) structures (not shown, such as grooves) on the high- helical cutting edges (e.g., 250, 252, 254, 256). The high-helical cutting edge and the low-helical cutting edge have a corresponding cutting angle relief surface (high- helical cutting angle relief surface and low-helical cutting angle relief surface) and clearance angle relief surface (high- helical clearance angle relief surface and low-helical clearance angle relief surface) for allowing radial clearance during milling operation. According to this embodiment of the present invention, the low-helical angle beta (β, of the primary flutes and of the low- helical cutting edges) is approximately 15° (+10°, -5°), and the high-helical angle theta (θ, of the secondary flutes and of the high-helical cutting edges) is approximately 65° (+10°, -20°). According to this embodiment of the present invention, the tool 200 includes two low helical cutting edges and four high- helical cutting edges. According to the present invention, the relationship between the helical angles θ and β is that: • the high-helical angle theta is greater than low-helical angle beta (θ>β) ; • the high-helical angle theta is much (e.g., at least 45°) greater than the low-helical angle beta (θ»β) ; and • the high-helical angle theta is at least 45° (θ>45°). However, the invention contemplates a range of helical angles for the primary flutes (e.g., 210, 212) and for the secondary flutes (e.g., 220, 222, 224, 226), in addition to the low (15°) and high (65°) helical angles set forth hereinabove. Evidently, it is important that the two sets of flutes intersect one another. The invention contemplates: • primary flute helical angles of at least 0° (axial, with respect to the tool body), but preferably no more than 45°, although primary flutes having helical angles greater than 45° is possible; and • secondary flute helical angles of no more than 65°, although secondary flutes having helical angles greater than 65° is possible. It is also within the scope of the present invention that the primary flutes are angled in a different direction than the secondary flutes in which case, for example, the two helical angles could be equal in magnitude but different in direction. For example, a set of primary flutes may have a left-hand helical angle of 30°, and a set of secondary flutes may have a right-hand helical angle of 30°. These angles, although equal in magnitude, are different (in direction) than one another, which will cause the primary flutes and the secondary flutes to intersect one another on the body portion. The helical angles can be modified over a wide range, for example: • primary flutes at 15°, secondary flutes at 65°; • primary flutes at 30°, secondary flutes at 60°; and • primary flutes at 50°, secondary flutes at 80°. According to the present invention, the relationship between the dimensions L2 and LI is on the order of 2:1 (±50%) . Preferably, the high-helical dimension is greater than the low- helical dimension (L2>L1) . However, these two dimensions could be equal (L1=L2) , or the relationship between them could be reversed (L1>L2) . ALTERNATE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION According to an alternate embodiment of the present invention, the end-mill tool may include more than two high- helical secondary flutes. A comparison of Figures IB and 2C, illustrates that some (e.g., 220, 224) of the secondary flutes exit and are visible at the point (204) , exhibiting their cross-section at that location. In this case, the other two secondary flutes (222, 226) terminate higher up along the body portion (i.e., away from the point) and are not visible in such an end view. In the views of Figures 3A and 3B, the primary (flat) cutting edges have been omitted, for illustrative clarity. Figure 3A illustrates an embodiment of an end-mill 300 the invention having three primary flutes 320, 322 and 324 which are visible in an end view looking onto the point of the end-mill. With three secondary flutes, this would be termed a "3x3" end- mill. Figure 3B illustrates an embodiment of an end-mill 400 the invention having four primary flutes 420, 422, 424 and 426, which are visible in an end view looking onto the point of the end-mill. With four secondary flutes, this would be termed a "4x4" end- mill. Various embodiments of the end-mill are fabricated according to the techniques set forth hereinabove, with regard to helical angles, spacing of a plurality of discrete low- helical leading edge cutting edges, and the like. They would differ, in the main, from the previously-described embodiments principally in the number of primary and secondary flutes formed in the end-mill tool. Generally, since each one-or-more ("N") primary flute is typically intersected at least once by each one-or-more ("M") secondary flute, various end-mills can be fabricated having "NxM" configurations. Generally, this will result in at least "N" times "M" discrete low-helical angle cutting edges. Generally, the number of high-helical angle cutting edges (e.g. 250) will be the same as the number of low- helical angle cutting edges (e.g., 240). However, the invention is not limited to any particular number of flutes or discrete low-helical angle cutting edges. The above, and other objects, features, advantages and embodiments of the invention, including other (i.e., additional) embodiments of the techniques discussed above may become apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art to which this invention most nearly pertains, and such other and additional embodiments are deemed to be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, it is possible to fabricate an end-mill tool, according to the present invention with only one primary flute and/or with only one secondary flute. The body portion would nevertheless have two "sets" of flutes - namely, a set of one- or-more primary flutes and a set of one-or-more secondary flutes intersecting the primary flutes. For example, using a solid carbide tool blank (rod) , flutes can be formed without requiring cutting edges (e.g., 240, 250), per se. In such a case, cutting would be performed by the edges of the flute surfaces (e.g. 230) . Appropriate clearance angles would be provided (e.g., ground) back from these cutting edges.

Claims: CLAIMS What is claimed is: 1. An end-mill tool, comprising: a shank portion; a point; and a body portion located intermediate said shank portion and said point, said body portion having two distinct sets of flutes, a first set of one-or-more primary flutes and a second set of one-or-more secondary flutes intersecting the primary flutes. 2. An end-mill tool, according to claim l, further comprising: a plurality of discrete cutting edges disposed at intersections of the first set of primary flutes and the second set of secondary flutes. 3. An end-mill tool, according to claim 1, wherein: the primary flutes are cut into the body portion at a helical angle of no greater than 45°. 4. An end-mill tool, according to claim 1, wherein: the secondary flutes are cut into the body portion at a helical angle of no greater than 65°. 5. An end-mill tool, according to claim 1, wherein: the end-mill tool has at least two primary flutes; and the end-mill tool has at least two secondary flutes. 6. An end-mill tool, according to claim l, wherein: the end-mill tool has at least three primary flutes. 7. An end mill tool, according to claim 1, wherein: the end-mill tool has at least three secondary flutes. 8. An end-mill tool, according to claim 1, wherein: the end-mill tool has at least four primary flutes. 9. An end-mill tool, according to claim 1, wherein: the end-mill tool has at least four secondary flutes. 10. An end-mill tool, according to claim 1, wherein: the secondary flutes are disposed on the body portion at a high-helical angle; and the primary flutes are disposed on the body portion at a low-helical angle. 11. An end-mill tool, according to claim 10, wherein: the high-helical angle is at least 45° greater than the low-helical angle. 12. An end-mill tool, according to claim 10, wherein: the high-helical angle is at least 45°. 13. An end-mill tool, according to claim 1, further comprising: the end-mill tool has an axis of rotation; a plurality of discrete leading-edge cutting edges disposed at intersections of the second set of secondary flutes and the first set of primary flutes, said leading-edge cutting edges having an axial extent of a dimension LI; and a plurality of helical cutting edges disposed along edges of the secondary flutes, and extending an axial dimension L2 measured along the axis of the end-mill tool. 14. An end-mill tool, according to claim 13, wherein: the dimension L2 is greater than the dimension LI. 15. A combined roughing and finishing end-mill tool comprising: a shank for engaging the end mill tool to a rotating device (e.g. , a spindle) ; a point for plunging said tool into a workpiece to a desired depth; a body located intermediate said shank and said point, said body having an inception point ("start") located at said point and an ending located on said shank; at least one high-helical flute face having angle theta (Θ) located on said body; said at least one high-helical flute face having at least one high-helical cutting edge axial length L2; at least one low helical flute face having angle beta (β) located on said body; said at least one low helical flute face having at least one low helical cutting edge axial length LI; and said low helical cutting edge interesting said high- helical cutting edge forming a helical cutting edge having axial length LI + L2. 16. A combined roughing and finishing end mill tool according to claim 15, wherein: said angle beta (β) is approximately 15° and said angle theta (Θ) is approximately 65°. 17. A combined roughing and finishing end mill tool according to claim 15, wherein: said helical cutting edge having a cutting relief surface and a clearance relief surface. 18. A combined roughing and finishing end mill tool according to claim 15, wherein: there are four low helical cutting edges and two high- helical cutting edges. 19. A combined roughing and finishing end mill tool according to claim 15, wherein: there are four low helical cutting edges and four high-helical cutting edges. 20. A combined roughing and finishing end mill tool comprising: a shank for engaging the end mill tool to a rotating device (e.g., a spindle); a point for plunging said tool into a workpiece to a desired depth; a body located intermediate said shank and said point, said body having an inception point ("start") located at said point and an ending located on said shank; a first low-helical angle flute face having angle beta (β) located on said body; said first low-helical angle flute face having a first low-helical angle cutting edge having axial length LI; a second high-helical angle flute face having angle theta (θ) located on said body; said second high-helical angle flute face having a second high-helical angle cutting edge having axial length L2; and said first low-helical angle cutting edge interesting said second high-helical angle cutting edge forming a compound helical cutting edge having axial length LI + L2.

Inventors: WARDELL LON J, WARDELL, LON, J.
Applicants: WARDELL LON J, WARDELL, LON, J.
Application year: 1995
Main classification: B23C5
IPC codes: B23C5