EPITHELIUM REMOVAL

Abstract: This invention is an accurate, nonmechanical removal of the epithelium (16) from essentially only the area of the cornea to be treated. In particular, an epithelium ablative laser device irradiates the selected region of the epithelium with ablative laser energy (21), a spectroscopic system nonitors (90) the ablation and spectroscopically determines whether epithelium is being ablated, and a control system (50) terminates the epithelium removal upon spectroscopic determination of a substantial absence of epithelium ablation.

Description: EPITHELIUM REMOVAL Field of Invention This invention relates to treatment of the eye and, more particularly, to a system and method for controlled removal of the epithelium of the cornea. Background of Invention Photorefractive keratectomy is a procedure in which excimer lasers are used to correct optical errors of the eye, such as myopia, near-sightedness, hyperopia, far¬ sightedness and astigmatism. One typical procedure is to remove corneal tissue using a laser configured at 193 nanometers, although other wavelengths may also be used. Each pulse of the laser removes a small amount of corneal tissue and, by controlling the number of pulses ' and exposure pattern of the laser, the cornea can be reshaped as desired. For example, to correct near-sightedness, more tissue is removed from the center than at the edge, so that there is an overall flattening of the cornea. An initial step in the procedure is to remove from the cornea the surface layer of cells known as the epithelium. The epithelium, typically about fifty microns thick, covers and protects the underlying tissue, principally collagen, that makes up the bulk of the cornea. In the past, the epithelium has been removed by scraping with a mechanical device, such as the edge of a blade or other surgical instrument. This has a number of disadvantages. For example, the use of any mechanical instrument presents some risk of infection, and mechanical removal is also inherently irregular and highly dependent on the skill of the person accomplishing the procedure. Scraping may injure the underlying cornea, e.g., by causing nicks or scratches which may in turn affect the smoothness of the later removal of the underlying collagen, and small "is¬ lands" of epithelium may remain after it is thought that all the epithelium has been removed or, in the course of scraping away the epithelium, some of the underlying collagen may be removed also. Moreover, to assure that the entire area to be treated has been exposed, it is usually necessary to remove the epithelium from an area that is larger than that to be treated. This is undesirable since, among other things, a larger area requires longer to heal and results in an increased risk of infection. For example, if the area of the collagen 16 to be treated is 5 millimeters in diameter, using mechanical ablation techniques it is usually necessary to remove the overlying epithelium 14 from a 6 or even a 7 millimeter zone. This result is that the overall exposed area is between about one and a half and two times the size of the treatment sone. Further, if the epithelium is mechanically removed, the laser used to ablate the underlying collagen cannot be positioned until after the epithelium removal has been completed, and this undesirably increases potential dehydra¬ tion and the overall length of the surgical procedure. Summary of Invention The present invention provides for accurate, non- mechanical removal of the epithelium from essentially only the area of the cornea to be treated. In particular, an epithelium-ablative laser device irradiates the selected region of the epithelium with ablative laser energy, a spectroscopic system monitors the ablation and spectroscopically determines whether epithelium is being ab¬ lated, and a control system terminates the epithelium removal upon spectroscopic determination of a substantial absence of epithelium ablation. In preferred embodiments in which the same laser device is then used to reshape the exposed cornea after the covering epithelium has been removed, the spectroscopic system detects characteristic fluorescence from corneal epithelium being ablated, the laser delivers energy in pulses, and the spectroscopic system examines for presence of epithelium fluorescence between pulses . Description of Drawings Figure 1 is a schematic illustrating a system according to the present invention. Figure 2 is a schematic illustrating a modified system also embodying the invention. Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments Figures 1 and 2 show a portion of a human eye, generally designated 10. As is well known, the cornea 12, surrounded by the sclera 14, includes an outer epithelial layer 16 (the epithelium) overlying the tissue 18 (largely collagen) that forms the bulk of the corneal structure. The epithelium 16 is typically about 50 microns thick, but the thickness varies from person to person. For example, the epithelium of a contact lens wearer is often only about 60% as thick as that of a typical person who does not wear contact lenses. Figures 1 and 2 also show an excimer laser 20, e.g., an Omnimed II manufactured and sold by Summit Technology, Inc. of altha , Massachusetts. Laser 20 emits a beam 21 of pulsed laser energy at a wavelength of about 193 nanometers, and is conventionally used to reshape the collagen 18 forming the corneal lens by selective ablation of the collagen tissue after the protective epithelium layer 16 has been mechanically removed. A variable aperture diaphragm 22 is provided in the beam path to control, and as necessary to vary, the diameter of the laser beam 21. As conventionally used, the aperture is set so that the diameter of the beam incident on the cornea is equal to that of the area to be treated. When different corneal thicknesses are to be removed from different areas, a smaller aperture may be employed and only a small amount of the overall treatment area ablated at any particular time. In either event, each pulse of the excimer laser ablates a small amount of corneal collagen tissue. It has been found that the laser ablation of the corneal collagen tissue causes emitted fluorescence. See Tuft et al., "Qualification of the Fluorescence Spectra Pro¬ duced by ArF Laser Ablation of the Cornea and Sclera, " Investigative Qpthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 31 No. 4 (Supp.) 1990, 477. Typically, the fluorescence caused by each ablating laser pulse follows, and exists for a period of time considerably shorter than the width of, the laser pulse itself. Tuft et al. found that the fluorescence resulting from a pulsed ArF laser had a duration on the order of 1-3 nanoseconds, about an order of magnitude less than the laser pulse width. It has been found that the laser beam from an excimer laser may also be used to ablate or remove the epithelial layer overlying the collagen structure of the cornea, but this has been proved difficult for a number of reasons . The thickness of the epithelium is difficult to measure accurately and, as has already been noted that the thickness of the epithelium varies from person to person. Additionally, the cellular structures of the epithelium and underlying collagen are sufficient different that the two ablate at different rates. Accordingly, although the laser will ablate the epithelium as well as the collagen tissue, it is not practical simply to use the laser to start ablation at the outer surface of the epithelium 16, and then to work down into the underlying collagen tissue 18. Rather, it is important to know when the covering epithelium has been completely removed, and only then to begin removal of the underlying collagen. If the point at which collagen tissue commences is not precisely known, it is difficult, if not effectively impossible, to have control collagen removal as is necessary for accurate corneal reshaping. It also has been found that, because of their different cellular structures, the collagen and overlying epithelium have significantly different spectroscopic characteristics, and that these spectroscopic differences may be used to provide an accurate measure of epithelium removal. For example, the fluorescence caused by excimer laser ablation of the epithelium 16 differs from produced by ablation of the underlying collagen 18. The fluorescence from the collagen tissue is a mixture of wavelengths, peaking at about 300 nanometers, in the ultraviolet range. Ablation of the epithelium also produces a range of fluorescence, but the peak is in the barely visible blue range, e.g., is in the range of about 400 nanometers. Both wavelengths can be detected using a conventional diode array detector such as that employed by Tuft; and the type of cells being ablated by the laser (e.g., epithelial cells or collagen cells) can be determined by monitoring the presence or absence of a fluorescence peak at the corresponding wavelength, e.g., barely visible blue (about 400 nanometer) or ultraviolet (about 300 nanometer) . Since fluorescence from the abraded epithelium is visible to the human eye and vanishes when epithelium removal has been completed, it is also possible to monitor epithelial ablation visually. Thus, according to one aspect of the present invention, a photodiode (designated 40 in Figure 1) sensitive to the characteristic peak of either collagen or epithelium ablative fluorescence is used to determine which of the two types of cells is being ablated. Preferably, the photodiode 40 is sensitive to epithelium-caused fluorescence (e.g., to fluorescence in the about 400 nanometer wavelength range, and the presence or absence of such a fluorescence peak is used as a control signal. Fluorescence having such a peak will be present so long as the laser is removing epithelium. Once the epithelium has been removed, that peak drops significantly. Control system 50, connected to both laser 20 and photodiode 40, is responsive to the photodiode 40 and either causes the lasing action of the laser to stop (as in the illustrated embodiment) or automatically causes the control system to commence the corneal-reshaping. Preferable, the same laser source and beam are used for both epithelium removal and subsequent reshaping of the underlying corneal tissue. As will be evident, this substantially avoids the previously significant difficulty of insuring that the laser is properly registered relative to the exposed area. It will also be noted that the width of the beam used for epithelium removal is same as the maximum laser beam diameter to be used for subsequent corneal reshaping, i.e., the laser is used first to remove the epithelium from the entire area to be treated, and then to provide the collagen ablation required for reshaping. If a smaller diameter laser beam is used for reshaping, e.g., because different thicknesses are to be removed from different sub-areas of the entire treatment area, it will be seen that the epithelium bordering the complete treatment area acts as a protective mask. In the embodiment of Figure 1, it will be seen that th laser beam.21 is substantially perpendicular to the entire portion of the eye being treated. The diameter of the treated portion, e.g., about 5 mm, is sufficiently small that the laser beam is substantially normal to all portions of the eye being treated. If a larger, e.g., 8-9 mm diameter, area is to be treated, the curvature of the eye may become significant. In such circumstances, although th radiation from the laser 18 is emitted as parallel rays, they will impinge on the eye at different angles and may cause ablation of epithelium at different rates in differen areas. Accordingly, it may be to provide additional means to insure ablation of epithelium throughout the selected region is substantially the same. Figure 2 shows a lens 70 placed between the laser and eye. Although the laser beam 21 is emitted from laser 18 a parallel rays, the optical characteristics of the lens 70 are such that, after passing through the lens, the laser beam rays are slightly convergent so that, throughout the treatment area, each ray is incident on the eye at a substantially normal angle. Alternatively, an ablative mask of varying thickness may Be provided between the laser source and the eye surface. The various portions of the mask block the laser beam until the particular mask portion has been ablated, an thus make it possible to vary the period of time during which the laser is incident on different areas of the epithelium and thus assure equal thickness of epithelium ablation over the entire treatment area. Whatever the circumstances, the system determines when all the epithelium has been removed, and the transition int the underlying collagen has begun, by sensing a spectroscopic difference between the epithelial and collagenic tissue. Other Embodiments In other embodiments, other spectral characteristics o the epithelium may be employed to provide a control signal indicative of the fact that the epithelium overlying the treatment area, but little or none of the underlying tissue has been removed. For example, either reflective or transmissive spectroscopy may be employed. Figure 2 illustrates a light source 80 incident on the treatment area, and a sensor 90 (rather than a photodiode as in Figur 1) that is responsive to the reflected light from the source. Since, as is well known, the characteristics of th reflected light depend on the cellular structure of the sur face on which light from the source is incident (and from which it is reflected) , sensor 90 provides a control signal indicating that the reflected light is from a collagen tissue surface (or, alternatively, is not from epithelium tissue) , and that substantially all of the epithelium has been removed. Regardless of the particular spectroscopic methodology employed, the transition between epithelium and collagen removal is indicated with considerably more accuracy than heretofore possible, and the size and thickness of any residual "islands" of epithelial material are substantially reduced. These and other embodiments will be within the scope o the following claims.

Claims: AMENDED CLAIMS [received by the International Bureau on 03 August 1995 (03.08.95); original claims 1,2,3,4,5,6,8 and 9 amended; new claims 14-19 added; remaining claims unchanged (3 pages)] 1. A system for controlled removal of epithelium from a selected region of a cornea, said system comprising: an epithelium-ablative laser device for irradiating a selected region of the epithelium with ablative radiation, a spectroscopic system arranged to spectroscopically monitor the selected region during ablation for spectro¬ scopically determining ablation of epithelium, and a control system responsive to the spectroscopic system for terminating application of ablative radiation from said laser device to said region upon spectroscopic detection of substantial absence of the ablation of epithelium. 2. The system of claim 1 wherein said spectroscopic system includes a detector for detecting fluorescence from said location during incidence of laser ablation energy on epithelium. 3. The system of claim 2 wherein said spectroscopic system includes a detector arranged to detect a characteristic blue fluorescence from corneal epithelium being ablated. 4. The system of claim 3 wherein said device produces the ablative radiation, and the ablative radiation substantially comprises electromagnetic radiation of about 193 run wavelength. 5. The system of claim 1 wherein said ablative laser device comprises a device for ablating collagen for reshaping the cornea upon completion of the removal of the epithelium. 6. The system of claim 5 wherein the laser device includes a controlled aperture for shaping, over the duration of exposure, a radiation pattern ablating the collagen for effecting a preselected refractive correction. 7. The system of claim 1 wherein said laser device is an excimer laser. 8. The system of claim 1 in which said epithelium- ablative laser is arranged to deliver at least most of its energy in pulses and said spectroscopic system is arranged to examine for the presence of epithelium between pulses. 9. The system of claim 1 wherein said device is arranged to emit radiation as parallel rays, and including means to cause rays distributed over the range of curvature in the selected region to have substantially the same ablation of epithelium thickness. 10. The system of claim 9 wherein said means is adapted to cause the rays to have substantially a normal angle of incidence over the selected region of epithelium. 11. The system of claim 10 in which said means comprises a lens system. 12. The system of claim 9 including means for varying the energy deposited over said selected area to assure equal thickness of epithelium ablation over said area. 13. The system of claim 12 including an erodible mask shaped to produce equal ablation over all points of said selected area. 14. The method of controllably removing epithelium from a selected region of a cornea, said method comprising the steps of: irradiating a selected region of the epithelium with ablative radiation, spectroscopically monitoring the selected region during ablation to spectroscopically determine ablation of epithelium, and terminating application of ablative radiation from said laser device to said region upon spectroscopic detection of substantial absence of the ablation of epithelium. 15. The method of claim 14 wherein said monitoring includes detecting fluorescence from said location during incidence of laser ablation energy on epithelium. 16. The method of claim 14 including the step of ablating collagen for reshaping the cornea upon completion of the removal of the epithelium. 17. The method of claim 14 including the step of shaping, over the duration of exposure, a radiation pattern ablating the collagen for effecting a preselected refractive correction. 18. The method of claim 14 wherein at least most of the ablative radiation from said laser device is delivered in pulses and wherein said spectroscopic system examines for the presence of epithelium between pulses. 19. The method of claim 14 including the step of varying the energy deposited over said selected area to assure equal thickness of epithelium ablation over said area. U STATEMENT UNDER ARTICLE 19 The claims of the international application have been amended, principally to insure the presence of proper antecedent basis. New method claims have been added. Replacement sheets 9-10/1 containing the amended claims are enclosed in accordance with PCT Article 19(1) . For ease of reference, a "blacklined" copy of the amended claims is also enclosed showing the deleted material in brackets and the new material underlined.

Inventors: STEINERT ROGER F, STEINERT, ROGER, F.
Applicants: STEINERT ROGER F, STEINERT, ROGER, F.
Application year: 1995
Main classification: A61B17
IPC codes: A61B17, A61F9