IMPROVEMENTS IN OR RELATING TO INSECT REPELLENTS

Abstract: Disclosed is an insect repellent composition comprising at least one active ingredient from the group of compounds consisting of: 1,2,3a,4,5,5a,6,7,8,9,9a,9b-dodecahydro-3a,6,6,9a-tetramethylnaphto [2,1-b] furan; 4-(tricyclo[5.2.1.0<2,6>] decylidene-8) butanal; 1-ethoxy-1-(2'-phenylethoxy) ethane; acetyl cedrene; propylidene phthalide; and tridecene-2-nitrile. Also disclosed is apparatus and a method for testing the efficacy of a substance as an insect repellent.

Description: Improvements in or relating to insect repellents Field of invention The present invention relates to fragrances which possess intrinsic insect-repellent properties, to compositions containing such fragrances and to a method of repelling insects. The invention also relates to apparatus and a method for testing the efficacy of a substance as an insect repellent. Background Insect have long been known as a nuisance and, for some insect genera, as a health hazard. Mosquitoes, for instance, are a proven vector of diseases, and the genus Aedes in particular is associated with yellow fever, dengue, encephalitis and malaria (Encyclopedia Britannica) . Although the problems may be reduced at source with the use of DDT and other chemical sprays in the breeding areas, fears over the persistence of chloroche icals combined with increasing mosquito resistance to control chemicals (e.g. insecticides) have led to a reappraisal of the magnitude of the nuisance and the hazard. Physical barriers to the insects are not always possible, e.g. in the open air, where some form of personal repellent is necessary. It is also a feature of recent times that the more environmentally-aware public tend to question to safety of many chemicals which were formerly taken for granted. One of these is the well-know personal insect repellent N,N- diethyl-m-toluamide (abbreviated as DEET, and commercially available as Delphone™) . This was originally seen as the natural successor to the parent molecule, N,N- diethylbenzamide which was found to be strongly insect repellent but also irritating to human skin (McCabe et al., (1954), J. Org. Chem. 19, 493-498) . Fears over possible allergenicity, disclosed in European Patent Application No. 167266 (Angus Chemical Company) , as well as aversion to some of the physical properties of this compound such as oiliness and odour, have led to the search for less hazardous and more aesthetically acceptable methods of repelling insect pests, particularly mosquitoes. Perfumes with intrinsic insect repellent properties, used either alone or in some form of carrier or base, overcome many of the problems highlighted above. Review of the prior art Certain perfumery ingredients have long been known to possess insect deterrent properties, some of this information coming from what might be termed "folk knowledge" . These materials include widely-known substances such as Citronella, Tolu and Peru Balsams, Eucalyptus oils, Huon Pine and other similar oils [M. Bouvier, International Frag. Co-ord. 29 October 1976]. Other materials known for their deterrent properties include those having camphoraceous odours, such as Camphor itself, Cypress oils, Galbanum etc. [H&R Contact, 36, 1984] . A more scientific approach to the properties of these natural sources has been undertaken by various researchers, such as Lemberkovics et al. [Acta Phar aceutica Hungarica, 57, (1987) 133-142], Nahrstedt [Planta med. 42 (4), 313-32 (1981)], and Popescu [Chim. Anal. (Bucharest), 2 (1) , 59-61 (1972)] who investigated the effects of Walnut Leaf oil. Kumbu and DiPhanzu [Plant Med. Phytother. 16 (1), 23-6 (1975)] investigated the deterrent effect of a range of Eucalypts against a selection of insect pests. However, modern perfumery encompasses a vast range of synthetic ingredients as well as natural substances. The work of W.V. King [US Department of Agriculture 1954, handbook 69] includes tests on a huge variety of synthetic chemicals tested included perfumery ingredients which were shown to have a deterrent effect against biting mosquitoes. The popularly-used DEET has also been studied in comparison, and in conjunction, with a range of ingredients by various researchers. Nishimura et al. [Kagaku to Seibbutsu, 27 (8) , 4886-6 (1989) ] investigated the possible synergy of Eucalyptus citriodora and menthanediols with DEET. Solvents such as diethyl phthalate, dimethyl phthalate and dibutyl phthalate are also well known, and these provide the basis for commercial repellents which do not contain DEET, and are also cited in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology [3rd Edn. 476ff] . Canadian Patent 1 230 826 (1988) uses a combination of Citronella or Lavender oils, 2-ethylhexanediol and dimethyl phthalate. Commonly utilised perfumery ingredients which provide "base notes' or act as fixatives are also known to extend the longevity of the protection. These incorporate such ingredients as Civet, Musk, ambergris, and Vanillin [Canadian Patent 1 106 278]. These are materials of perfumery ingredients. Rutledge [J. Am. Mosq. Control Association, 5 (1) March 1989] states that the effect of boiling point or molecular weight on the prolongation of protection time has been corroborated by several workers, often in independent studies. Further studies on high boiling point ingredients used in connection with perfumery, referred to as "heavies" in WO 92/02136 (R&C Products Pty) , are defined as having a boiling point greater than about 80-100°C at 4 mm Hg, and their synergistic use with diols derived from the acid cyclisation of citronella is described. Another example of such a "heavy" is Hercolyn D. (methyl ester of dihydroabietic acid) , which is included in examples in US 5 109 022 (cited previously) and US 5 089 469. The teaching of this last patent describes the insect repellent use of Bisabolene-containing compositions. Repellent chemicals may be classified into two main groups: general deterrents; and species-specific deterrents. Substances known to deter one species have been known to serve as an attractant to another. An example of this is the use of a mixture of citronellol and eugenol against clothes moths and Anthrenus beetles, described in patent application no. DE 3 901 341A [published 1990, Detia Freyberg GmbH]. The latter ingredient, Eugenol, is considered to be a general insect attractant [Kirk Othmer encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, cited above]. DEET, however, is considered to be a general, or broad-spectrum, insect repellent. Ingredients cited in the following section have been tested against mosquitoes, in particular against the genus Aedes. These materials may also act as general insect repellents. A more recent publication discloses the use of perfumery ingredients such as a range of ketones in repelling Musca domestica and Aedes aeqypti for a finite period of time [US patent 5 091 423, Wilson et al] . Specific repellent perfumery materials described therein include alpha, beta and delta Damascones, and the compositions are typically applied in perfumed candles. Other materials having a bearing on perfumery include well-known solvents. Jeanne and Gregg disclose a composition containing methyl myristate, methyl pal itate and butyl palmitate, singly or in combination, as a repellent for "flying, biting and stinging insects", [US patent 5 109 022] . A further class of materials having value as perfumery ingredients are the N-alkyl neoalkanamides (Cl to 4) , disclosed in UK patent application number GB 2 194 787A. These are also described as being "sufficiently substantive to the substrate being washed" (when incorporated into shampoos, liquid and bar soaps, etc.) "so as to impart insect repelling properties to it". Several documents describe a variety of test methodologies for determining the efficacy of a substance as an insect repellent, such as US 5 109 022 US 5 089 469 which describe the use of an insect olfactometer, and the patent application EP 0 476 885A which describes the use of live chicks. In spite of the many investigations into the deterrent effect of chemicals against a variety of arthropoda, there is as yet no general method whereby one may reliably predict the specific or general deterrent efficacy of untested materials. It is thus an object of the present invention to provide effective insect repellent compositions comprising perfumed ingredients and to provide apparatus and a method for testing the efficacy of substances as insect repellents. Summary of the Invention In a first aspect the invention provides an insect repellent composition comprising at least one of the group of compounds consisting of: 1,2, 3a,4, 5,5a, 6 , 1 ,8, 9,9a,9b-dodecahydro-3a, 6,6, 9a- tetramethylnaphtho [2,1-b] furan; 4-(tricyclo [5.2.1.0 2 - 6 ] decylidene-8) butanal; l-ethoxy-l-(2'-phynlethoxy) ethane; acetyl cedrene; and propylidene phthalide; 1,2, 3a,4, 5, 5a, 6,7, 8, 9,9a, 9b-dodecahydro-3a, 6, 6, 9a- tetra ethylnaphtho [2,1-b] furan is commercially available as AMBERLY™, and the compound is hereinafter referred to as "amberlyn" for the sake of brevity. Similarly, 4- (tricyclo [5.2.1.0 26 ] decylidene-8) butanal is commercially available as DUPICAL™, and the compound is hereinafter abbreviated as "dupical". 1-ethoxy-l-(2'- phenylethoxy) ethane is commercially available as EFETAAL™ and the compound is hereinafter abbreviated as "efetaal". Acetyl cedrene is commercially available as LIXITONE™. The invention also provides use of a perfumed composition comprising at least one of the group of compounds consisting of "amberlyn", "dupical", "efetaal", acetyl cedrene, and propylidene phthalide as an insect repellent. In a further aspect the invention provides a perfumed composition for use as an insect repellent, the composition comprising at least one of the group of compounds consisting of: "amberlyn"; "duplical"; "efetaal"; acytyl cedrene; and propylidene phthalide. Preferably the compositions variously defined above are used to repel biting insects, such as mosquitoes, particularly members of the genus Aedes. Preferably the compositions comprise at least 2.5 % w/w, more preferably at least 5 % w/w, and most preferably at least 7.5 % w/w of at least one of the six compounds defined above. It is preferred that the compositions comprise two or more of the compounds defined above. Compositions in accordance with the invention are capable of repelling insects upon immediate application and for up to at least 1 hour after application. Compositions in accordance with the invention preferably constitute, or are comprised in, personal products or cosmetics for use on the skin and/or hair. Examples of such products include fine fragrances, colognes, skin creams, skin lotions, deodorants, talcs, bath oils, soaps shampoos, hair conditioners and styling agents. Alternatively, compositions in accordance with the invention may constitute, or be comprised in, household products such as: air fresheners (including "heated" air fresheners in which insect repellent substances are released upon heating e.g. electrically, or by burning [e.g. joss-sticks, candles]); hard surface cleaners; or laundry products (e.g. laundry detergent-containing compositions, conditioners) . Preferably the cosmetics, personal products and household products defined above comprise between 0.1 % and 10 % of a composition in accordance with the invention. The compositions of the invention preferably comprise additional perfumery materials to produce pleasing perfumes with useful repellent activity. Other materials which may be present in the compositions (at concentrations from 0-97.5 % w/w) include fragrances, solvents, diluents and fixatives known in the art, such as: Aldehyde Cll (Undecylenic Aldehyde) ; Aldehyde iεo Cll (GIV) ; Allspice oil; Allyl cyclohexyl propionate; Amyl sakicylate; Amylcinnamic aldehyde; Anethole; Anisic alcohol; Anisic aldehyde; Applinal (Q) ; Bay oil; Benzyl acetate; Benzyl benzoate; Benzyl cinnamate; Benzyl propionate; Benzyl salicylate; Bourgeonal (Q) ; Brahmanol; Camphor powder synthetic; Cedarwood Virginion; Cedrenol; Cedryl acetate; Celestolide (IFF) ; Cineole; Cinnamic alcohol; cinnamic aldehyde; Cinnamon Leaf Oil; Cinnamyl acetate; cis-3-Hexenol; Citral; Citronella oil; Citronellal; Citronellol; Citronellyl acetate; Citronellyl oxyacetaldehyde; Clove oil; Coriander oil; Coumarin; Cuinic aldehyde; Cyclamen aldehyde; Decanal; 9-Decenol; Dibenzyl ether; Dibutyl phthalate; Diethyl phthalate; Dihydromyrcenol; Dimethyl anthranilate; Dimethyl phthalate; Dimycretol (IFF) ; diphenylmethane; Diphenyl oxide; Dimethyl benzyl carbinyl acetae; Dodecanol; Dodecanal; Elemi oil; Ethyl methyl phenyl glycidate; Ethyl cinnamate; Ethyl safranate (Q) ; ethyl vanillin; Eugenol; Evergreen oils (Pine oils etc.); gamma-Nonalactone; gamma- undecalactone; Cardamide (Q) ; Geraniol; Geranium bourbon; Geranyl acetate; Geranyl formate; Gum Benzoin; Heliotropin; Hercolyn D (HER) ; Hexyl benzoate; Hexylcinnamic aldehyde; Hydratropic aldehyde dimethyl acetal; Hydroxycitronellal; Hydroxycitronellal dimethyl acetal; Indole; iso Bornyl acetate; Isolongifolanone; Isopropyl myristate; Iso-cyclocitral (GIV, IFF) ; Jasmacyclene; Jasmin oil; Lavandin Abrialis; Lavender oil Lilial (GIV); Linalol; Linalyl acetate; Maceal (Q) ; Menthol Laevo; Methyl anthranilate; Methyl cedryl ketone; Methyl dihydrojasmonate; Methyl ionone; Methyl ionone, alpha iso-; Methyl myristate; Methyl naphthyl ketone; Methyl salicylate; Moss treemoss; Musk ketone; Neocaspirene (Q) ; Nerol; Nerolin Bromelia; Neryl acetate; Nonanal; Oakmoss absolute; Octanal Olibanu resionoid; para-Cresyl phenylacetate; para-Mehoxyacetophenone; Patchouli oil; Peppermint oil; Petitgrain oil; 2- Phenoxyethanol; Phenoxyethyl iso butyrate; Phenylethyl acetate; Phenylethyl alcohol; Phenylethyl butyrate; Phenylethyl phenylacetate; Pimento oil; Pinene, alpha; Para-tert.butyl-cyclohexyl acetate; Resinoid Benzoin Siam; Rose oil; Rosemary oil; Sandalwood oil; Terpineol; Tetrahydrolinalol; Tetrahydromuguol (IFF); Thyme Red; Undecanal; Vanillin; Verbena oil; Vetyvert Bourbon; Yara; and Ylang ylang. Compounds are obtainable from the suppliers as indicated below: for those compounds labelled "(Q)", - Quest International, "(IFF)" - International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc., "(GIV)" - Givaudan, "(HER)" - Hercules B.V.. In another aspect, the invention provides a method of repelling insects from an object or an airspace, comprising application to the object or into the airspace, of an effective amount of a composition in accordance with the invention. Typically the object is a human body. In yet another aspect, the invention provides apparatus for testing the efficacy of a substance as an insect repellent, said apparatus comprising: a housing having an inlet and outlet for air, said inlet and outlet being inter-connected by a passage comprising one or more filters to remove carbon dioxide and volatile organic compounds from the air passing therethrough and at least one test chamber for receiving and retaining the insects concerned, said test chamber being associated with the substance under test. Preferably the apparatus comprises means for monitoring the behaviour of the insects within the test chamber. Conveniently such monitoring means comprises a video camera and video recorder. Preferably the apparatus further comprises means for forcing air through the housing in the desired direction. Conveniently this comprises a fan near the inlet, which may be supplemented with an exhaust fan near the outlet if desired. Preferably the apparatus also comprises further means of regulating the air flow, such as a damper situated near the inlet fan. Preferably the housing comprising two filters adjacent to the air inlet. Conveniently, one such filter comprises activated charcoal and the other filter is a "molecular sieve" (such as the type 5A zeolite filter, obtainable from Union Carbide) to remove C0 2 and volatile organic molecules which might affect the test. In a preferred embodiment, the material in each filter is held within the cells of a 1 inch thick aluminium honeycomb, sandwiched between 2 sheets of stainless steel mesh and retained within an aluminium frame. The frames are fitted to the inside of the housing such that air passing through the housing must pass through the filters. I a preferred embodiment the apparatus comprises means for introducing an insect attractant downstream of the filter(s) . Typically such means comprise a sealable aperture. Suitable attractants will vary depending on the insect concerned, but may include carbon dioxide or Guinea Pig odour. Preferably the insect used is a mosquito. More preferably the insect is a 4-7 day old naive insect. A species such as Aedes aeqypti is found particularly suitable. It is highly preferred that the side walls of the test chamber are substantially air tight. The end walls must be at least partially air permeable to allow the substance under test to enter and exit the test chamber. Preferably the end walls of the test chamber comprise cotton netting. This is of sufficiently fine material to retain insects such as mosquitoes but allows the free flow of air. Preferably the housing comprises more than one test chamber. Conveniently four such chambers are used. Where more than one test chamber is present, the test chambers are arranged "in parallel" such that air containing a test substance passes through only one test chamber. It is preferred that the test substance is impregnated on a membrane which may be, for example, skin such as artificial skin or cadaver skin. Preferably the membranes are warmed (compared to the ambient temperature) and humidified. This is preferably accomplished by contacting the inner surface of the membrane with a supply of warm water. In use, the apparatus is assembled with the insects concerned retained within the test chamber. The substance under test is placed in (on the upstream side) the test chamber. Air enters the housing via the inlet and passed through the filters. The test substance at least partially vapourises and is carried in the air flow through the passage interconnecting the air inlet and outlet (thus passing through the test chamber) . The effect of the test substance on the insects in the test chamber can be monitored, either by a human observer or, for example, electronically. In a further aspect, the invention provides a method of testing the efficacy of substance as an insect repellent, comprising use of the apparatus defined above. The various aspects of the invention will now be further described by way of example and with reference to the drawing Figure, which is a schematic representation of the apparatus of the invention. In the embodiment shown in Figure 1, the apparatus comprises a housing 10 comprising an inlet fan 16 and exhaust fan 18, respectively. The inlet fan 16 is also associated with the shuttered damper 20, which sereves to further regulate the flow of air. The housing further comprises filters 22, 24 and four test chambers 26, 28 (only two shown) . Each test chamber holds 20 naive insects of the species Aedes aecrypti (not shown) and a membrane impregnated with a test substance. The apparatus also comprises four Sanyo™ VC-2512 monochrome CCD video cameras 32 (only shown for clarity) , the Panasonic™ colour quad system WJ-450 (not shown) , a VTG-22 video timer (omitted for clarity) , the Panasonic™ W-180VHS video cassette recorder 34, and the Sanyo™ VM- 4512 monitor 36. The apparatus may be assembled and used according to the following description. Four test chambers were prepared using 12 inch 200 gauge layfalt tubing. The synthetic plastics tubing was attached to oblong stainless steel frames (6 inches by 6 inches by 36 inches) using double-sided adhesive tape. 8 inch squares of cotton netting were used to cover the ends of the chambers and secured using adhesive tape. An aluminium tunnel, forming the inlet end region of the housing 10, comprised the filters 22 and 24. Filter 22 comprised activated charcoal and filter 24 comprised a type 5A zeolite "molecular sieve" (from Union Carbide) to remove C0 2 and volatile organic substances. The material in each filter was held within the cells of a 1 inch thick sheet of aluminium honeycomb, sandwiched between 2 sheets of stainless steel mesh, held in an aluminium frame. The filters were bolted by their frames to the inside of the aluminium tunnel. Four artificial membranes 30 were prepared as follows: double layers of membrane were stretched over the open end of four thistle funnels and secured using elastic bands. Testing is carried out at 27 °C. The membranes were kept moist and warmed above the ambient temperature throughout the test by passing a supply of water (at 34 °C) through the thistle funnels, so as to contact the inner surface of the membranes. The candidate repellent under test (30 microlitres) was applied to a membrane and spread as evenly as possible across the membrane surface. This was repeated with two other test materials (although the same substance may be tested, if desired, to give triplicate results) , and the fourth membrane left untreated as a control. The membranes were then inserted into the test chambers (as shown in Figure 1) . The exhaust fan was switched on to vent air from the apparatus. 20 mosquitoes were then introduced into each test chamber. 24 inch 200 gauge layflat tubing was used to connect the various elements and the inlet fan 16 switched on and damper 20 opened. Air was thus forced through the inlet 12, the filters 22, 24 over the artificial membranes 20 and through the test chambers 26, 28 containing the mosquitoes. The separation of the membranes ensured that air passing over a particular membrane would pass through only one test chamber. Four cameras 32 positioned downwind of the test chambers were each focused onto a particular membrane, and the images produced by the cameras displayed on a single monitor 36 by means of a quad splitter. An electronic time is used to project the date and time onto the screen, and the VCR 34 used to record the data. The mosquitoes in the test chambers were activated by introduction of a stimulus upwind of the target membranes (such as human breath, or guinea pig odour) and the number of insects attempting to bite each membrane over the next ten minute period was recorded. After ten minutes, the recording was stopped and the test chambers removed from their position immediately downwind of the membranes. The treated membranes were left untouched (although still warmed and moistened) for one hour with the fans switched on, after which time the test chambers were re-introduced and the test repeated to determine the repellency of the test candidates one hour after application. General Example Using the apparatus of the invention, a large number of perfumed substances were analysed for efficacy as insect repellents. Sample results for some of those compounds tested are shown in Table 1. This table shows the repellency (as measured by the percentage reduction in the number of mosquitoes on the treated membrane compared to the untreated control) , both initially when the test substance is first applied, and after a delay of one hour. The table shows that "dupical" and propylidene phthalide are the most effective insect repellents. Repellency Material Initial One hour Amberlyn™ 52 % 18 % Dupical™ 87 % 68 % Efetaal™ 83 % 36 % Lixetone 37 % 38 % Proylidene phthalide 86 % 76 % Specific Examples A number of perfume compositions were made in accordance with the invention, each comprising at least 2.5 % w/w of one of the active compounds identified previously and comprising other standard perfumery materials. These compositions were termed perfumes I-IV and had the following formulations (numbers refer to parts per thousand) : (Trademark materials are indicated as above) ; Perfume 1 Musk Ketone 25 Vanillin 10 Methyl napgthyl ketone 10 Diethyl phthalate 150 Hercolyn D (HER) 100 Amylcinnamic aldehyde 60 Geraniol 205 Dimyrcetol (IFF) 100 Eugenol 20 Methyl ionone, alpha iso 50 para-tert. Butyl cyclohexyl acetate 80 Lixetone (Q) 30* Lavandin Abrialis 150 Aldehyde C12 (Laurie) 50 % in diethyl 10 phthalate (DEP) 1000 * Table 1 material Perfume II Musk Ketone 25 Vanillin 10 Methyl napgthyl ketone 10 Diethyl phthalate 150 Hercolyn D (HER) 100 Amylcinnamic aldehyde 60 Geraniol 205 Dimyrcetol (IFF) 100 Eugenol 20 Methyl ionone, alpha iso 20 Efetaal (Q) 25* para-tert. Butyl cyclohexyl acetate 110 Lavandin Abrialis 150 Dupical (Q) 50* Aldehyde C12 (Laurie) 50 % in diethyl 10 phthalate (DEP) 1000 * Table 1 material Perfume III Musk Ketone 25 Vanillin 10 Methyl napgthyl ketone 10 Diethyl phthalate 150 Hercolyn D (HER) 100 Amylcinnamic aldehyde 60 Geraniol 205 Dimyrcetol (IFF) 100 Eugenol 20 Methyl ionone, alpha iso 20 Efetaal (Q) 30* Lixetone (Q) 120* Lavandin Abrialis 140 Dupical (Q) 50* Aldehyde C12 (Laurie) 50 % DEP 10 1000 * Table 1 material Perfume IV Coumarin 50 Vanillin 10 Ethyl vanillin 10 Heliotropin 40 para-Methoxy acetophenone 25 Cinnamic alcohol 50 Amberlyn super (Q) 50* Methyl anthranilate 20 Diphenylmethane 25 Diethyl phthalate 150 Iso propyl myristate 50 Amylcinnamic aldehyde 75 Benzyl propionate 50 Hexyl benzoate 125 Geraniol 75 Phenylethyl alcohol 50 Phenoxyethyl iso butyrate, beta 20 Hydroxycitronellal 30 Efetaal (Q) 40* Ethyl methyl phenyl glycidate 15 Propylidene phthalide 5* Tridecene-2-nitrile 5 Aldehyde C8 50 % DEP 10 Aldehyde Cll 50 % DEP 10 Aldehyde C12 (Laurie) 50 % DEP 10 1000 * Table 1 material A fifth composition, Perfume V, was prepared which was not a composition in accordance with the invention. It comprised large amounts of standard perfumery materials, including those which are preferred adjuncts to compositions of the invention, but it did not include any of the six active compounds defined previously. Perfume V was used for comparison and had the following formulation: Perfume V: (an example of a formulation which includes ingredients selected from the list of preferred materials, but which omits any ingredients claimed in Table 1, for comparison) . Aldehyde C8 1 Aldehyde CIO 3 Benzyl acetate 75 Benzyl alcohol 10 Citral 175 Citrathal (Q) 25 Geranyl nitrile 30 Jasmacyclene (Q) 2 Lemon oil 230 Musk xylene 10 Nerolin Bromelia 10 Orange terpenes 300 para tert. Butyl cyclohexyl acetate 35 Terpinyl acetate 93 Traseolide (Q) 1 1000 Perfume compositions I-IV were assayed for efficacy as insect repellents using the apparatus defined previously, in an experiment comparing them with perfume V. The results are shown below in Table 2, which gives the repellency (measured in terms of the % reduction in the number of mosquitoes on treated membranes relative to an untreated control) , both initially and after one hour. As can be seen, Perfumes I-IV all showed significantly greater repellency than the comparison Perfume V, at both time points. The order of repellency (after one hour, best first) was Perfume III, Perfume I, Perfume IV, Perfume II. Table 2 Repellency Material Initial One hour Perfume I 88 % 58 % Perfume II 88 % 27 % Perfume III 87 % 81 % Perfume I 77 % 48 % Perfume V 34 % 10 %

Claims: Claims 1. An insect repellent composition comprising at least one active ingredient from the group of compounds consisting of: 1,2, 3a,4,5,5a, 6,7,8, 9,9a, 9b- dodecahydro-3a, 6,6,9a-tetramethylnaphtho [2, 1-b] furan; 4-(tricyclo [5.2.1.0 26 ] decylidene-8) butanal; l-ethoxy-l-(2'- phenylethoxy) ethane; acetyl cedrene; and propylidene phthalide. 2. A perfumed composition for use as an insect repellent, the composition comprising at least one active ingredient from the group of compounds consisting of: 1, 2, 3a,4,5, 5a, 6,7, 8, 9, 9a, 9b- dodecahydro-3a, 6,6,9a-tetramethylnaphtho [2, 1-b] furan; 4-(tricyclo [5.2.1.0 2,6 ] decylidene-8) butanal; 1-ethoxy-l-(2'-phenylethoxy)ethane; acetyl cedrene; and propylidene phthalide. 3. A composition according to claim 1 or 2 , comprising at least 2.5% v/v of active ingredient. 4. A composition according to claim 1, 2 or 3, comprising at least 5% w/w of active ingredient. 5. A composition according to any one of the preceding claims, comprising at least 7.5% w/w of active ingredient. 6. A composition according to any one of the preceding claims, comprising at least 2 of the six compounds defined in claim 1. 7. A composition according to any one of the preceding claims, comprising 0-97.5% w/w of standard perfumery ingredients. 8. A composition according to any one of the preceding claims, comprising 0-97.5% w/w fragrances, solvents, diluents and fixatives. 9. A composition according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the composition is effective at repelling mosquitoes. 10. A composition according to any one of the preceding claims, capable of repelling insects for at least 1 hour after application to an object or an airspace. 11. A cosmetic or personal product comprising a composition in accordance with any one of the preceding claims. 12. A household product comprising a composition in accordance with any one of claims 1-10. 13. A product according to claim 11 or 12, comprising between 0.1% and 10% of a composition in accordance with any one of claims 1-10. 14. A method of repelling insects from an object or an airspace, comprising application to the object or into the airspace of an effective amount of a composition in accordance with any one of the preceding claims. 15. Apparatus for testing the efficacy of a substance as an insect repellent, said apparatus comprising: a housing having an inlet and outlet for air, said inlet and outlet being interconnected by a passage comprising one or more filters to remove C0 2 and volatile organic compounds from the air passing therethrough and at lease one test chamber for receiving and retaining the insects concerned, said test chamber being associated with the substance under test. 16. Apparatus according to claim 15, further comprising means for monitoring the behaviour of the insects within the test chamber. 17. Apparatus according to claim 16, wherein the means for monitoring comprises a video camera and (optionally) a video recorder. 18. Apparatus according to any one of claims 15 to 17, wherein the substance to be tested is impregnated on a semi-permeable membrane. 19. Apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the semi- permeable membrane is maintained above ambient temperature and kept moist by a supply of warm water. 20. Apparatus according to any one of claims 15 to 19, comprising a plurality of substances to be tested and the same number of test chambers, such that air containing a particular substance to be tested passes through only one test chamber. 21. Apparatus according to any one of claims 15 to 20, further comprising means for introducing an insect attractant downstream of the filter(s) . 22. A method of testing the efficacy of a substance as an inset repellent, comprising use of apparatus according to any one of claims 15 to 21. 23. Use of a perfumed composition comprising at least one active ingredient from the group of compounds consisting of: 1, 2 , 3a,4, 5, 5a, 6,7, 8 ,9, 9a,9b- dodecahydro-3a, 6,6, 9a-tetramethylnaphtho [2 , 1-b] furan; 4-(tricyclo [5.2.1.0 26 ] decylidene-8) butanal; l-ethoxy-l-(2'-phenylethoxy) ethane; acetyl cedrene; and propylidene phthalide as an insect repellent.

Inventors: BEHAN JOHN MARTIN, HEALEY TIMOTHY PHILIP, OLIVER JENNIFER VALERIE, PAYNE IAN MICHAEL, PERRING KEITH DOUGLAS, SHARPINGTON PAMELA JANE, BEHAN, JOHN, MARTIN, HEALEY, TIMOTHY, PHILIP, OLIVER, JENNIFER, VALERIE, PAYNE, IAN, MICHAEL, PERRING, KEITH, DOUGLAS, SHARPINGTON, PAMELA, JANE
Applicants: BEHAN JOHN MARTIN, HEALEY TIMOTHY PHILIP, OLIVER JENNIFER VALERIE, PAYNE IAN MICHAEL, PERRING KEITH DOUGLAS, QUEST INT, SHARPINGTON PAMELA JANE, BEHAN, JOHN, MARTIN, HEALEY, TIMOTHY, PHILIP, OLIVER, JENNIFER, VALERIE, PAYNE, IAN, MICHAEL, PERRING, KEITH, DOUGLAS, QUEST INTERNATIONAL B.V., SHARPINGTON, PAMELA, JANE
Application year: 1995
Main classification: A01N43
IPC codes: A01N31, A01N37, A01N39, A01N43, A01N45