SCREEN FOR INHIBITORS OF CHITINASE

Abstract: The present invention is directed to a method for screening samples for the identification of agents exhibiting potential fungicidal and insecticidal activity for a wide variety of agricultural, medical and pharmaceutical uses. The method utilizes cells that comprise a plasmid-born CTS gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which allows for over expression of chitinase. Compounds that inhibit a hydrolytic action on methyl- umbelliferyltriacetyl chitotriose, but which are not toxic to the cells are detected by decrease in conversion of substrate.

Description: SCREEN FOR INHIBITORS OF CHITINASE Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method of screening compounds that inhibit chitinase. More specifically, the present invention relates to the identification of antifungal, insecticidal and antiparasitic compounds for use in agricultural and pharmaceutical applications. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The polysaccharide chitin is a structural cell wall component of most fungi and is the most abundant organic skeletal component of invertebrates, making up, for example, from about 25 to 60% of the dry weight of insect cuticles. Chitin consists primarily of linear polymers of the amino sugar N-acetyl-D-glucosamine joined in 1,4-/S- glucosidic linkage. Thus, chitin bears a close resemblance to cellulose, the major structural polysaccharide of plants, the only chemical difference being that in chitin the hydroxyl group on the 2-position is an acetoamido group instead of an hydroxyl group. However, because of its widespread occurrence in fungi and arthropods, the total world-wide production of chitin vastly exceeds cellulose. Many fungi and arthropods having chitinouε cell walls or exoskeletons are injurious- to plants and animals, causing a legion number of diseases including, but not limited to, wheat eyespot, rice sheath blight, damping off, apple scab, pepper botrytiε, rice blast, sugar beet cercospora, tomato early blight, wheat leaf rust, and wheat powdery- mildew. Fungal species also cause a myriad of cutaneous and systemic mycoses in human beings and other animals, including, but not limited to, candidiasiε, histoplasmosiε, blastomycosis, pneumocystiε, εporotrichosis and cryptococcoεis. Insectε can act as vectors of viruses causing arboviral encephalitides, yellow fever, and dengue, protozoa causing malarias, trypanoεomiaεes, and leishmaniases, and various harmful helminths. Crustaceans also carry some infectious helminths and trematodes. Most fungicides and insecticides that are used to control or cure these diseases by killing or controlling their causative agents, intermediate hosts, or vectors employ various modes of action including physical poisons that suffocate or desiccate organisms; protoplasmic poisons such as arsenicals that kill by precipitating or deactivating proteins, enzymes or other cellular constituents; respiratory poisons that deactivate reεpiratory enzymes; and various poisons that affect different tissue systems such as tubules or nerves. Of course, preferred agents do not injure the host plant or animal, and most preferably have no effect whatsoever on the host. Because of the complexity and interdependence of life processes, however,, this goal is not always achieved, so that many fungicides and insecticides exhibit some toxicity to the host. Others cause unexpected side effects. Since chitin is not a uεual conεtituent of moεt plants and vertebrates, chitin biosynthesis inhibitors can be employed as selective antifungal and/or insecticide agents. Applied to ornamental or edible plants or animals, theεe offer the advantage of targeting undesirable fungi or insects without- harming significantly the host plant or vertebrate animal. While much attention has been paid to chitin synthesis, there have been very limited studies targeting screens which exploit chitin degradation. 1- (2,6-Dichlorobenzoyl) -3-(3,4- dichlorophenyDurea, for example, has been suggested as a chitin-inhibiting insecticide. Antifungals that have also been found to inhibit chitin synthesis include nikkomycin and polyoxin D. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It iε an object of the preεent invention to provide a screening test for the identification of agents exhibiting potential fungicidal and insecticidal activity for a wide variety of agricultural, medical and pharmaceutical uses. This and other objects are accomplished by the present invention, which is directed to a method of screening compounds useful as antifungal, insecticidal and antiparasitic agents. The preferred method utilizes cells that comprise a plasmid-bom CTS gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae which allows for over expression of chitinase. Compounds that inhibit a hydrolytic action on methyl-umbelliferyltriacetyl chitotriose, but which are not toxic to the cells, are detected by decrease in conversion of substrate. The present invention allows for the high volume screening of chemicals and fermentations for inhibitors of chitinase for insecticide, antiparasitic and fungicide- applications. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The discovery of most pharmaceutical and agricultural chemical products has resulted, at least in part, from the screening of either chemical libraries or natural products. A variety of εcreening systems that employ mammalian cells or yeast cells are well-known by those skilled in the art and have been described. In the practice of this invention, test εamples are incubated in the presence of cultureε of any fungal εpecies that produces chitin, such aε unicellular fungi. A preferred method employs common baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, because it iε readily available and eaεy to culture. A preferred method comprises adding a test sample to a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture. The test sample iε introduced to a disk or a well on a culture plate in a standard diffusion assay using εolidified media, or introduced into one of a series of equivalent tissue culture tubes or bottles in a standard turbidity assay using liquid media. The culture is incubated for such time under such conditions sufficient to observe yeast cell growth inhibition in a corresponding culture or culture plate area. The extent of growth of the culture containing or surrounding the teεt sample is compared with the extent of growth in the culture or culture area containing no test sample. The extent of toxicity of the text sample is determined by observing whether growth in the presences of test sample iε substantially the same aε growth in itε absence. The present invention relies on the expression of chitinaεe on the yeaεt cell surface and detection of enzyme activity with a stibstrate by observing the extent of substrate conversion. Any type of substrate for chitinase that affords easy detection of enzyme activity can be employed including fluorescent substrates, colored dyes and turbid substrates that become clear when exposed to enzyne activity. Examples of substrants include: colloidal chitin, glycol chitin, 3-4 dinitrophenyl tetra-N-acetyl chitotetra oεide, 4- methylumbelliferyl di-N-acetyl chitobioside, 4- methylumbelliferyl tri-N-acetyl chitotrioεide, or 4- methylumbelliferyl tetra-N-acetyl chitotetraoside. Any type of solidified or liquid media that will support growth and reproduction of S. cerevisiae may be employed as cultures in the method of this invention. Numerous yeast media are known to the skilled artisan, and include, for example, yeast synthetic dextrose (SD) containing glucose, vitamins, minerals, and water. Preferred media are εolidified by adding agar or gelatin; especially preferred are media solidified with agar. Growth in εolidified cultureε is ordinarily observed visually as turbid areas of growth around disks or wells in the culture plate. Growth in liquid cultures is observed visually, but is ordinarily determined spectrophotometrically as enhanced optical density (OD) at about 550 to 650 nm. A distinct advantage of the invention iε itε εpeed and εimplicity. Baker'ε yeaεt iε readily available and inexpenεive. Using solidified media in culture plates, the protocol is extremely simple. Many εamples can be readily analyzed in a short time. It is another advantage of the invention that only small amounts of biochemical or chemical agents are required in the test. In a standard assay, for example, which employs solidified media in a plate, as little aε 20 μg of a biochemical or chemical teεt εample can be applied to a disk or in a well. In a preferred embodiment of this invention, the εcreen relieε on the expression of excess chitinase on the cell surface and direct detection of enzyme activity with a fluorescent substrate. This embodiment is achieved by using yeast cellε transformed with a plaεmid carrying the chitinaεe gene. The transformed yeaεt cells are dispersed and grown in agar, substrate is applied and the extent of the reaction is aεεayed by observation of the plate under ultraviolet illumination. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the fluorescent substrate is 4- methylumbelliferyl-tri-N-acetyl chitotrioxide (MUC) . In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the chitinase gene is carried on plaεmid pCT21 which is essentially the same as plasmid pCT3 (Kuranda, M.J. and Robbins, P.W., (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA vol. 84, 2585-2589) except that the vector sequences comprise the well known and commercially available YEp24 instead of the deεcribed YEAp24. pCT21 over-expresεed chitinaεe from 4-25 fold over wild type cellε lacking the plaεmid. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the present invention compriseε a primary εcreen and εecondary screen which increases both sensitivity and specificity of the invention. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention can be practiced using the primary screening alone, the secondary screen alone or a combination of the primary εcreen and secondary screen. One skilled in the art should also appreciate that the primary screen could be practiced after the secondary screen depending on the ultimate objective of the invention. Standard in vitro and in vivo fungicide and insecticide discovery screens are employed as tertiary tests to prioritized actives from the present primary εcreen and the secondary screen. These in vitro screenε teεt samples for their ability to inhibit the growth of selected phytopathogenic fungi cultured in nutrient agar (or insects) . These include fungi causing wheat eyespot {Pse docercosporella herpotricho des ), rice sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani ) and damping off (Fusarium oxysporυm) ; all synthesize chitin- containing cell walls. In in vivo screens, a variety of phytopathogenic fungi are used to infect plants treated with test compounds. Active compounds block or reduce the appearance of diseaεe symptoms. A number of model plant infections are employed in the screen and include chitin-containing fungi that cause apple scab (Venturia inaegualis) , pepper botrytis (Botrytis cincerea) , rice blast {Pyriculair oryzae) , εugar beet cercospora {Cercospora beticola) , tomato early blight (Alternaria solani ) , wheat leaf rust (Puccinia recondita tritici) , and wheat powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis tritici ) . The most potent test compounds in these assays are active in the 10 ppm range. The following examples are presented to further illustrate and explain the present invention and should not be taken as limiting in any regard. Examples Exaiφle 1 - PREPARATION OF YEAST EXTRACTS (Chitinase extract) Inoculate 200 ml and grow EC18-4B pCT as for primary screen. Centrifuge culture at 300rpm for 10 min. Pour off supernatant, re-spin 1 min and remove remaining supernatant. Reεuεpend cellε in 4 X 1ml of buffer (25mM Meε-0.1% digitonin-0.1%2- mercaptoethanol, pH 6.3, for chitinaεe; 0.1M Na citrate, pH 5.0 for glucanaεe) in a εcrew cap centrifuge tube. Add approximately 0.5mm glass beads to just below the meniscus and Vortex vigorously or put on a Mini-Bead-Beater for approximately 2 minutes. Remove liquid, wash beads with 0.5ml buffer, add wash to the rest of the extract. Centrifuge at 10,000 rpm for 2 minutes. Remove supernatant, measure itε volume and add 1/2 volume glycerol and vortex gently. Store in aliquots at -80°C (the extracts are then tested in the appropriate enzyme asεay to ensure sufficient activity and linearity over time. 5 μl and 45 minutes is εtandard) at 30°C. Example 2 - PRIMARY IN VITRO ENZYME ASSAY Grow the cell to stationary phase (overnight) in SD plus supplements without agar and without chloramphenicol. The Uracil requirement is supplied by the chitinase gene-containing plasmid pCT21. To retain the plasmid uracil must NOT be added. Cells can be εtored for one week or more after εuεpending them in the agar medium and pouring the plate. For large scale, high capacity screening add εterile σlvcerol (15% final volume) to the fresh, εtationary phaεe cultureε and store at -8Θ-°C in aliquots appropriate for test plate volume. If using frozen cells, allow to thaw at room temperature and vortex. Add cells at 1:50 to SD plus supplements (with chloramphenicol when testing and natural products) that has been melted and cooled to about 50°C. Allow to solidify and apply compounds with a Clonemaster , or cut wells and add fermentations robotically. The positive control is allosamidin (1.25μg) . Allow cells to grow 24 hours at 30°C. Melt the assay overlay agar, cool to about 50°C, and add MUC. Mix well and apply to plate situated on a level εurface for even diεtribution of soft agar. A large square plate that has 150 ml of agar requires 330 ml of overlay. When plates have cooled, place them back at 30°C and score after about two hours. Alternatively, MUC can be added directly to the SD plus supplements at the same time cells are added. In this case, no assay overlay agar is necessary. While wearing UV-protective glasses, place plates on a UV transilluminator (cover off, agar face down) and observe level of blue fluorescence around wells. Mark wells with decreased fluorescence (compare to allosamidin) . In normal light, determine whether decrease in fluoreεcence is due to growth inhibition. Score a compound positive that decreases fluorescence but does not inhibit growth. To mimic chitinase inhibition, various high-pH εolutionε (which are known to inhibit chitinase) are applied to filter discε and placed on the agar. Good fluoreεcence is obtained after overlaying substrate, and a zone of inhibition is- seen only with the εtrongeεt alkali εolutionε teεted (e.g. 10M NaOH) . Other material designed to mimic fermentations and the potential interfering compounds therein (proteases [e.g. 10 mg/ml] Proteinase K, trypεin] , buffering capacity) are found not to cause a false positive signal. Antimicrobial test agents are unnecessary in thiε screen since antifungalε and other compounds that nonspecifically inhibit growth are scored as negative. Allosamidin, an analog of the natural substrate chitin, is known to inhibit Bombyx mori and Saccharomyces chitinase, but not plant chitinases (e.g. the enzyme from yam) . Allosamidin is very clearly positive at about 1.25-2.5μg per application. However, the more recently found compound, demethylallosamidin has been shown to be 100 fold more active than allosamidin and εhould be obεervable at 0.0125μg per application (500ng/ml) . Applying the compound at a high concentration in DMSO on the agar εurface as is done for other high- volume plate screens works aε well aε filter disk application. The best results for "welled" plates iε to apply the compoundε in 25μl in the well. In a reconstruction experiment 10 randomly chosen fermentation broths are "spiked" with 5 μg allosamidin in 25μl and applied to a primary screen plate. All 10 wells are clearly positive, whereas the same broths without allosamidin are negative. The secondary aεεay iε much more sensitive. Allosamidin inhibits chitinase to approximately the 50% level at lOOng/ml final concentration in the assay. No inhibition of glucanaεe iε detectable. The screen iε teεted with thirty four standard teεt compoundε exhibiting a variety of modes of action as well as with seventy six compounds that comprise a standard panel of antibiotics, as disclosed in Tables 1 and 2. All were negative, as are fermanation 44D048, aristeromycin, diflubenzuron (dimilin) and known chitin synthase inhibitors polyoxin and nikkomycin. For chemical bank screening approximately 0.03% of compounds are judged positive in the primary εcreen. After processing over 20,000 chemicals, none have passed the secondary screen. For natural products the primary screen reεultε in 0.9% active, but in over 15,000 assays only 2 (0.013%) have pasεed the εecondary εcreen. Table 1 - Standard Fungicide Panel Table 2 - Standard Antibiotic Panel pimaricin (tennecetin) streptogramin ("type") monazomycin nystatin aspartocin badtra n clavidn dtrinin avoparcin isoqmnocycline neutramycin A1531 leucomycin AO341a angustmycin A & C gliotoxin. gjbberelϋc acid puromydn puromydn aminonucleoside BM123a etamycin modmydn neomycin vioπψcin netropsin lincomydn picramycin A9537 AN272a levomydn AM374 antiprozoin BL580 zeta actithiazic add ha ydn ca bomycin frenolicin fusarinic acid BL580a tylosin declomycin tetrahydro spiramydn usnicacid geldanamydn Z122OA BM782a BO2964 complex chloramphenicol A8363 actinomycin BM123a AD97 phenazine a paromomycin streptomycin A4825 BO2964 complex nucleocidin nonactin valinomydn C19004 complex avilamycin V214W V214X • vancσmydn ristocetin relomycin CO8078a blastocidinS 4-dedimethylamino-4- methylamino-anhydro- tetracycline Example 3 - Secondary in vitro Enzyme Assay Actives from the primary εcreen are put- through the εecondary aεsay which takes about 2 hours to perform for several dozen samples, including preparation and analysis. This consiεtε of two different in vitro enzyme aεεayε: glucanase and chitinaεe (the target) . Broths that inhibit chitinase but not glucanase in these tests are judged positive. Those that display an absolute differential for these enzymes are first priority leadε. Brothε that εhow greater than twice the inhibition of chitinaεe versus glucanase should be followed up with secondary priority. For each primary screen positive two enzyme assays are performed in microtiter dish wells. For each εet of aεεayε, make a Mix of buffer, Substrate and water, and add fermentation broth and enzyme: Chitinase: Mix=lM Na citrate: 1/4 MUC: water, 5:10:20 Per assay: Mix 35μl broth or water (control) lOμl Chitinase extract 5μl Incubate for 45 min at 30°C, then add lOOμl glycine-NaOH, mix. Glucanase: Mix = 1M Na citrate:MUG:water, 5:10:20 Per assay: Mix 35μl broth or water (control) lOμl Chitinaεe extract 5μl Incubate aε for chitinaεe. Read both assays in a fluorimeter (350nm excitation, 440nm emisεion) . Compare controls for each to broth effect on each. Broths that inhibit chitinase at least twice as much aε they inhibit glucanase are judged positive.

Claims: What is claimed: 1. A method of screening test εamples for chitin degradation including a primary in vitro enzyme aεsay and a secondary in vitro enzyme assay, said primary asεay compriεing the εtepε of: (a) adding the test εample to a chitinaεe producing yeaεt culture, said culture containing a substrate for chitinaεe; (b) incubating said test sample in said culture under conditions sufficient to detect inhibition of chitinase enzyme activity; (c) comparing the extent of substrate conversion in the area around test sample with the extent of substrate conversion in the area void of said test sample; (d) determining the presence of chitinase inhibition by observing the extent of substrate conversation; and said εecondary aεsay comprising the steps of: (e) adding a test εample that exhibits chitinase inhibition in εaid primary assay to a εeries of secondary enzyme assays, said secondary enzyme asεayε selected from the group consiεting of a chitinase asεay and at leaεt one other control enzyme aεsays; (f) incubating said test εample in said secondary enzyme asεayε under conditionε sufficient to detect inhibition of chitinase and inhibition of said control enzyme asεay; (g) simultaneously compriεing chitinaεe inhibition and control enzyme inhibition; and (h) determining whether the extent of chitinase inhibition is greater than the control enzyme inhibition. 2. The method of Claim 1 wherein the yeast culture overproduces chitinase. 3. The method of Claim 2 wherein the yeast culture comprises plasmid pCT21. 4. The method of Claim 1 wherein the enzyme activity is detected with a fluoreεcent stibstrate. 5. The method of Claim 1 wherein the enzyme activity is detected with a colored dye substrate. . The method of Claim 1 wherein the enzyme activity is detected with a clearing of turobidity. 7. The method of Claim 1 wherein the substrate is selected from the group of consistng of colloidal chitin, glycol chitin, 3-4 dinitrophenyl tetra-N-acetyl chitotetra oside, 4-methylumbelliferyl di- N-acetyl chitobioside, 4- methylumbelliferyl tri-N-acetyl chitotrioεide, or 4-methylumbelliferyl tetra-N-acetyl chitotetraoεide. 8. The method of Claim 1 wherein the εubεtrate iε 4-methylumbelliferyl tri-N- acetyl chitotrioεide, or 4- methylumbelliferyl tetra-N-acetyl chitotetraoside. 9. The method of Claim 1 wherein a poεitive control is selected from the group consiεting of allosamidin or demethylallosamidin. 10. The method of Claim 1 wherein the enzyme asεay control of step (a) iε glucanaεe.

Inventors: SILVERMAN SANFORD JAY, SILVERMAN, SANFORD, JAY
Applicants: AMERICAN CYANAMID CO, AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
Application year: 1995
Main classification: C12Q1
IPC codes: C12Q1