A BASIC PROTEIN COMPOSITION FOR KILLING OR INHIBITING MICROBIAL CELLS

Abstract: A composition consisting essentially of a basic protein or peptide capable of killing microbial cell, e.g. a protamine or protamine sulphate, in combination with a cell-wall degrading enzyme and/or an oxidoreductase, e.g. an endoglycosidase Type II, a lysozyme, chitinase, peroxidase enzyme system (EC 1.11.1.7) or laccase enzyme (EC 1.10.3.2), has bactericidal, bacteriostatic, fungicidal and/or fungistatic properties and is useful in detergent and hard surface cleaning compositions and in methods for killing microbial cells present on a hard surface, for killing microbial cells or inhibiting growing microbial cells present on laundry, for killing microbial cells present on humain or animal skin, mucous membranes, wounds, bruises or in the eye; and in preservation of food, beverages, cosmetics, contact lens products, food ingredients or enzyme compositions.

Description: A BASIC PROTEIN COMPOSITION FOR KILLING OR INHIBITING MICROBIAL CELLS The present invention relates to a composition capable of killing microbial cells or inhibiting growing microbial cells, i.e. a bacteriocidal, bacteriostatic, fungicidal and/or fungistatic composition; a cleaning or detergent composition comprising a substance capable of killing microbial cells or inhibiting growing microbial cells; and methods for killing microbial cells present on a hard surface, on skin or in laundry, and for preserving food products, cosmetics etc. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION At this time of increased public interest in reducing the use of chemical additives, it is relevant to consider na¬ tural alternatives for antimicrobial agents used e.g. for preserving foods, as desinfectants, and as an antimicro- bial ingredient of detergent and cleaning compositions. This has increased interest in preservation using live bacterial cultures (Jeppesen & Huss 1993) and enzymes like lactoperoxidase (Farrag & Marth 1992) , glucose oxi- dase (Jeong et al . 1992) and lysozyme (Johansen et al. 1994) . Protamines are basic proteins with a high arginine con¬ tent found in association with DNA of spermatozoan nuclei of fish, birds, mammals etc. (Rodman et al . 1984; Kossel 1928) . Protamine is used clinically as an antidote to heparin (Jaques 1973) and as a carrier of insulin, pro¬ longing the absorption of subcutaneously administered insulin (Brange 1987) . Attention has also been paid to the functional properties of protamine as a stabilizing agent (Phillips et al . 1989). Protamine has been shown to have an antibacterial effect (Hitsch 1958) , but this aspect has not been thoroughly studied. The Gram-negative bacteria are often resistent to a large number of harmful agents due to the effective permeabili- ty barrier function of the outer membrane (Nakae 1985) . However, protamine and most other cationic peptides are under certain conditions apparently able to traverse the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria (Vaara 1992, Vaara & Vaara 1983) , probably as a result of their bin- ding to the anionic lipopolysaccharide-covered surface of the Gram-negative cell. The mechanism of the antibac¬ terial action of basic peptides is not known, but it has been suggested that they form a channel in the cytoplas- mic membrane, thus uncoupling electron transport and cau- sing leakage (Christensen et al . 1988; Hugo 1978; Kagan et al . 1990). It has also been proposed that they induce autolysis due to activation of the autolytic enzymes (Bi- erbau & Sahl 1991) . In general, the occurance of highly-basic peptides such as protamine is relatively rare in nature. However, of those studied, several have been found to demonstrate antibacterial properties: eg. nisin (Sahl 1987) , defensin (Lehrer et al . 1993), cecropins (Christensen et al . 1988) , Pep5 (Bierbaum & Sahl 1987) and melittins (Vaara 1992) . Antibacterial activity is usually measured as a decrease in colony counts, a decrease in the absorbance of a bac- terial suspension or as inhibition zones on agar plates (Trevors 1986) . However, these methods may not be suit¬ able when assaying the antibacterial effect of a basic peptide or protein such as protamine due to the aggluti¬ nation of the positively-charged protamine and the nega- tively-charged bacterial cells as described by Islam et al . (1984). Thus, the object of invention was to provide an antibac¬ terial and/or antifungicidal composition comprising a natural active compound or substance, i.e. which is non- toxic, of biological origin, easily available and rela¬ tively inexpensive, optionally in combination with other antimicrobial compounds or substances. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It has now surprisingly been found that it is possible to kill microbial cells or inhibit growing microbial cells by means of a basic protein or peptide of biological ori¬ gin, e.g. protamine or protamine sulphate. For certain bacteria or fungi, it may be necessary to combine the basic protein with a cell-wall degrading enzyme or an oxidoreductase in order to obtain the desired antimicro¬ bial effect. Accordingly, the growth inhibitory effect of protamine and the potential lethal effect of this basic protein on non-growing cells has been investigated. Due to the methodological shortcomings described above, impedimetric measurements were used and compared to traditional plate counts (Firstenberg-Eden & Eden 1984; Connolly et al . 1993) . Thus, based these findings the present invention provides a bacteriocidal, bacteriostatic, fungicidal and/or fun- gistatic composition comprising a basic protein or pep¬ tide capable of killing microbial cells in combination with a cell-wall degrading enzyme or an oxidoreductase. In another aspect, the present invention provides a detergent or cleaning composition comprising a basic pro¬ tein or peptide capable of killing microbial cells and a surfactant. Such compositions have a pH in the alkaline range and it has been found that basic proteins such as protamine and protamine sulphate exhibit their optimum antimicrobial effect at alkaline pH, thus making such proteins very suitable for incorporation in compositions for cleaning purposes. The composition of the invention is useful as antimicro¬ bial ingredient wherever such an ingredient is needed, for example for the preservation of food, beverages, cos- metics, contact lens products, food ingredients or enzyme compositions; as a desinfectant for use e.g. on human or animal skin, mucous membranes, wounds, bruises or in the eye; for killing microbial cells in laundry; and for incorporation in cleaning compositions for hard surface cleaning. THE DRAWINGS The invention is further illustrated by the drawings, in which Figure 1 shows the effect of protamine on growth of Yer- sinia enter ocol it ica growing in TSB at 25°C. Growth is measured as % change in conductance; Figure 2 shows calibration curves relating conductance ▲ (Shewanella putrefaciens strain A2) or capacitance ■ (Li- εteria monocytogenes strain 032) detection times in TSB at 25°C to colony counts in the absence of protamine; Figure 3 shows the effect of various concentrations of protamine on the Gram-negative bacteria Pseudomonas aero- ginosa in dependance of pH. Figure 4 shows the effect of various concentrations of protamine on the Gram-positive bacteria Listeria monocytogenes in dependance of cell concentration (inoculum, log CFU/ml) . Figure 5 shows the effect of various concentrations of protamine on the Gram-negative bacteria Shewanella putre- faciens in dependance of cell concentration (inoculum, log CFU/ml) . Figure 6 is a response surface plot showing the synergis- tic effect of a composition of the invention (various concentrations of protamine and lysozyme) on the Gram-ne¬ gative bacteria Shewanella putrefaciens in dependance of cell concentration (inoculum, log CFU/ml) . DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In the present context, the term "bacteriocidal" is to be understood as capable of killing bacterial cells. In the present context, the term "bacteriostatic" is to be understood as capable of inhibiting bacterial growth, i.e. inhibiting growing bacterial cells. In the present context, the term "fungicidal" is to be understood as capable of killing fungal cells. In the present context, the term "fungistatic" is to be understood as capable of inhibiting fungal growth, i.e. inhibiting growing fungal cells. The term "growing cell" is to be understood as a cell having access to a suitable nutrient and thus being capable of reproduction/propagation. By the term "non- growing cell" is meant a living, but dormant, cell, i.e. a cell in the non-growing, non-dividing, non-multiplying and non-energized state with metabolic processes at a minimum. The term "cell-wall degrading enzyme" is to be understood as an enzyme which degrades components of the cell wall, e.g. peptidoglucans such as murein and pseudomurein; chi- tin; and teichoic acid. Examples of cell-wall degrading enzymes which are useful in compositions of the present invention are endoglycosidases Type II, e.g. the endo- glycosidases Type II disclosed in EP-A2-0 425 018 which is hereby incorporated by reference, lysozymes and chitinases. The term "amino acids present in mammalian cells" denotes the 20 amino acids constituting the proteins being part of mammals, i.e. alanine, arginine, asparagine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamine, glutamic acid, glycine, histi- dine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylala- nine, proline, serine, threonine, tryptophan, tyrosine, valine. Preferably, the basic peptides or proteins of the composition of the invention consist of one or more of the mentioned 20 amino acids, i.e. the basic peptides or proteins may not be recovered from e.g. bacteria such as for example nisin and Pep5. The term "oxidoreductase" means an enzyme classified as EC 1. according to the Enzyme Nomenclature (1992) , i.e. any enzyme classified as EC 1.1 (acting on the CH-OH group of donors), EC 1.2 (acting on the aldehyde or oxo group of donors), EC 1.3 (acting on the CH-CH group of donors), EC 1.4 (acting on the CH-NH 2 group of donors), EC 1.5 (acting on the CH-NH group of donors), EC 1.6 (acting on NADH or NADPH) , EC 1.7 (acting on other nitrogeous compounds as donors), EC 1.8 (acting on a sulfur group of donors) , EC 1.9 (acting on a heme group of donors), EC 1.10 (acting on diphenols and related substances as donors), EC 1.11 (acting on a peroxide as acceptor), EC 1.12 (acting on hydrogen as donor), EC 1.13 (acting on single donors with incorporation of molecular oxygen (oxygenases) , EC 1.14 (acting on paired donors with incorporation of molecular oxygen), EC 1.15 (acting on superoxide radicals as acceptor), EC 1.16 (oxidizing matal ions), EC 1.17 (acting on -CH 2 - groups), EC 1.18 (acting on reduced ferredoxin as donor), EC 1.19 (acting on reduced flavodoxin as donor), and EC 1.97 (other oxidoreductases) . The term "peroxidase enzyme system" is to be understood as a peroxidase (EC 1.11.1) in combination with a source of hydrogen peroxide which may be hydrogen peroxide or a hydrogen peroxide precursor for in situ production of hydrogen peroxide, e.g. percarbonate or perborate, or a hydrogen peroxide generating enzyme system, e.g. an oxi¬ dase and a substrate for the oxidase or an amino acid oxidase and a suitable amino acid, or a peroxycarboxylic acid or a salt thereof. Examples of useful peroxidases are lactoperoxidase, horseradish peroxidase, peroxidases producible by culti- vation of a peroxidase producing strain Myxococcus vireε- cens , DSM 8593, Myxococcus fulvus , DSM 8969, or Myxococcus xanthus , DSM 8970, of a peroxidase producing strain of the genus Corallococcuε , preferably belonging to Corallococcus coralloides , DSM 8967, or Corallococcuε exiguu , DSM 8969. In case of lactoperoxidase, thiocyanat may be used as a substrate. Laccases are enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of a substrate with oxygen; they are known from microbial, plant and animal origins. More specifically, laccases (EC 1.10.3.2) are oxidoreductases that function with molecu¬ lar oxygen as electron acceptor. Molecular oxygen from the atmosphere will usually be present in sufficient quantity, so normally it is not necessary to add extra oxygen to the process medium. Examples of a laccase enzyme useful in the compositions of the present inven¬ tion is laccase obtainable from the strain Coprinus cinereuε, IFO30116, or from a laccase having immunochemical properties identical to those of a laccase derived from Coprinus cinereus, IFO30116; or obtainable from a strain of Myceliophthora thermophile as disclosed in WO 91/05839. The term "microbial cells" denotes bacterial or fungal cells. By the term "of biological origin" is to be understood that the substance or compounds is recovered or regener¬ ated from biological material such as humans, animals or plants. Similarly, the term "of microbiological origin" denotes that the substance or compounds is recovered or regenerated from microbiological material such as bacteria, fungi, yeast or that a parent or native sub¬ stance or compound is producible by a microbiological organism. The term "biological material" denotes living material obtainable from Nature or previously living material obtainable from Nature. The term "synthesized polypeptide" denotes a synthesized assembly, i.e. a chain, built of peptide monomers. Polypeptides which are useful in the present compositions are basic polypeptides, i.e. polylysins and polyarginins and co-polymers thereof. It is preferred that the polypeptides have a chain length of less than about 100 amino acids but it is contemplated that polypeptides of less than about 1000 kD are useful. Preferably, the polypeptides to be used in the composition of the inven- tion is of almost identical chain length or molecular weight but mixtures of polypeptides having various chain lengths or molecular weights are also useful. It is contemplated that the basic protein of the composi¬ tion of the invention may be a recombinant protein. In case of protamine, it is contemplated that the protamine may be a recombinant protamine, i.e. produced by cloning of a DNA sequence encoding the protein and subsequent cell transformed with the DNA sequence and expressed in a host, i.e. a suitable fungal or bacterial host. A recom¬ binant protamine/protamine sulphate may be cloned and ex¬ pressed according to standard techniques conventional to the skilled person. Preferred basic proteins to be used in the compositions of the present invention are protamines, protamine sul¬ phates, defensins, magainins, melittin, cecropins and protegrins; more preferably protamines and protamine sul¬ phates. Hitherto it has been known that protamine from salmon has a bacteriocidal effect on growing Gram-positive bacteria (1000 μg/ml). Islam et al . (1984) found that it inhibited growth but did not determine whether the effect was bacteriocidal or bacteriostatic. Other studies have reported that protamine is not effective against Gram- negative bacteria (Islam et al . 1984; Yanagimoto et al . 1992) . Contrary to this observation, it has now been found that protamine is effective against Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi. The same applies for protamine sulphate. It has been suggested the primary antibacterial effect of many of the basic peptides is their ability to penetrate the cytoplasmatic membrane, disrupting the electron transport and induce leakage of intracellular compounds. Without being bound to this theory, this mechanism may explain in part the effect of protamine on some of the strains tested in the experiments described in the Examples below. In another aspect, the present invention relates to a cleaning or detergent composition comprising a basic pro¬ tein or peptide capable of killing microbial cells and a surfactant. The detergent or cleaning composition may further com¬ prise other enzymes conventionally used in detergent or cleaning compositions. Preferably, the detergent or cleaning composition of the invention comprises at least one enzyme selected from the group consisting of protea¬ ses, a ylases, cellulases, and lipases. The surfactant of the detergent or cleaning composition is preferably a detergent surfactant, more preferably a detergent surfactant selected from the group consisting of anionic, nonionic, ampholytic, zwitterionic and catio- nic surfactants. In a preferred emboodiment, the detergent or cleaning composition comprises as the basic protein a protamine or a protamine sulphate in an amount effective for killing cells or inhibiting growth of cells, preferably in an amount corresponding to between 1 and 4000 μg per ml cle¬ aning liquor or washing liquor, more preferably between 1 and 2000 μg per ml cleaning liquor or washing liquor, especially between 5 and 1000 μg per ml cleaning liquor or washing liquor. In a further aspect, the present invention relates to the use of the compositions of the invention for various pur¬ poses, i.e. the invention also relates to a method for killing microbial cells present on a hard surface which method comprises contacting the surface with a cleaning composition of the invention, preferably a composition comprising a protamine or a protamine sulfate, in an amount effective for killing the cells. Also, in yet another aspect the invention relates to a method for killing microbial cells or inhibiting growing microbial cells present on laundry which method comprises contacting the laundry with a detergent composition of the present invention, preferably a composition compri¬ sing a protamine or a protamine sulfate, in an amount effective for killing the cells or for inhibiting growing cells. In yet another aspect the invention relates to a method for preservation of food, beverages, cosmetics such as lotions, creams, gels, soaps, shampoos, conditioners, an- tiperspirants; contact lens products, food ingredients or enzyme compositions which method comprises incorporating into the unpreserved food, beverages, cosmetics, contact lens products, food ingredients or enzyme compositions a basic protein or basic peptide or a composition of the present invention in an amount effective for inhibiting growing microbial cells, preferably a protamine or a pro- tamine sulphate or a composition comprising a protamine or a protamine sulphate. In yet another aspect the invention relates to a method of killing microbial cells present on human or animal skin, mucous membranes, wounds, bruises or in the eye which method comprises contacting the cells to be killed with a basic protein or peptide in an amount effective for killing the cells, preferably a protamine or prota¬ mine sulphate. Thus, the compositions of the invention and/or the basic peptides or proteins used in these com¬ positions, especially protamines and protamine sulphates, may by useful as desinfectants, e.g in the treatment of acne, infections in the eye, skin infections; in antiperspirants; for cleaning end desinfection of contact lenses etc. The invention is further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples. EXAMPLE 1 Bacteriocidal and bacteriostatic effect of protamine Materials and Methods BACTERIA, INOCULUM, MEDIA AND REAGENTS The bacteria used in the study are listed in Table 1 be¬ low. Stock cultures were maintained in Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB) (Oxoid CM129) with 0.5% glucose, 2% skimmed milk powder, 4% glycerol and stored at -80°C. Cells from the stock culture were streaked on TSB plates (TSB with 1.2% agar) and incubated 48 h at 25°C. One co- lony of bacteria was inoculated in 5 ml of TSB and grown 24-36 h at 25°C. This culture was used as inoculum. TSB with 1.2% agar was used for plate counts which were done by surface inoculation and incubation of the plates at 25°C. Ten-fold dilution rates were prepared using sterile peptone saline (0.1% peptone, 0.85% NaCl) . Protamine from Salmon (P-4005) was obtained from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, USA) , dissolved in distilled water, filter sterilized (0.2 μm) and used immediately after preparation. Table 1 Bacterial strains tested for sensitivity to protamine Bacteria Gram Code (reference) reaction (ref.) Aeromonaε εobria (g) - F4 Aeromonaε εalmonicidae (a) - AS1 Pεeudomonaε fluoreεcenε (h) - AH2 Shewanella putrefaciens — A2/A6/ (j)/(k)/(k)/(k) A11/A22 Vibrio anguillarum (b) - E2 ViJrio paraheamolyticuε (b) - VP Yersinia enter ocolitica (c) - 11 Brochotrix thermos phacta (d) + BT Liεteria monocytogeneε + 032/057 (e)/(m) Staphylococcuε aureuε (d)/(f) + M2/SA Eεcherichia coli (b) - EC Pεeudomonas aerugxnoεa (f) - PA Bacilluε εubtiliε (n) + ATCC 6633 Corynebacterium jeikeium (f) + CJ Strains obtained from: (a) Fish Pathology Laboratory, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Denmark. (b) Dept. for Veterinary Microbiology and Hygiene, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Denmark. (c) Environmental and Food Laboratory, Skovlunde, Denmark. (d) Department of Biotechnology, Technical Uni¬ versity of Denmark. (e) Campden Food and Drink Association, Chipping Campden, United Kingdom. (f) Department of Clinical Microbiology, Statens Seruminstitut, Denmark (g) Knøchel, 1989. (h) Gram et al . f 1990. (j) Jørgensen, 1986. (k) Jørgensen and Huss, 1989. (m) Ben Embarek and Huss 1993. (n) Chung, Steen and Hansen, 1994. IMPEDANCE DETERMINATIONS Volumes (1.0 ml) of TSB medium were added to Bactometer® wells. Protamine solutions (0.1 ml) were transferred to the wells which were sealed, connected to the Bactometer B123-2 (bioMerieux UK ltd., UK) and incubated at 25°C until a significant detectable increase in the electrical conductivity of the medium was registered and the detec¬ tion time (DT) was recorded (maximum 100 h) . Detection usually occurs when the cell concentration reaches 10 6 -10 7 cfu/ml. For the Gram-positive strains the capacitance signal was monitored, while change in conductance was used for Gram-negative strains. EFFECT OF PROTAMINE ON GROWING CELLS The antibacterial activity of protamine on growing cells was measured in the Bactometer modules. The wells (con¬ taining 1 ml TSB and 0.1 ml protamine solution) were ino¬ culated with 0.1 ml from a 10 "4 dilution of an inoculum culture, giving a final cell concentration in the well of approximately 10 3 cfu/ml. The concentration of protamine varied from 1 to 4000 μg/ml depending on the sensitivity of the strain investigated. Minimum Inhibition Concentration (MIC) was determined as the lowest concentration of protamine resulting in absen- ce of a DT. When no DT was measured, the lethal/inhibitory effect on the cells were tested by plating the total well volume. EFFECT OF PROTAMINE ON NON-GROWING CELLS 1 ml of inoculum diluted to 10 "3 was inoculated in 250 ml TSB (approximately 10 3 cfu/ml) and incubated at 25°C for 24 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (2000*g for 10 min), washed twice with 0.067 M sterile sodium phosp¬ hate buffer pH 7.0 (Weisner 1984) and resuspended in the same buffer. The absorbance at 450 nm (OD 450 ) of the bac¬ terial suspension was adjusted to 1.0 (approximately 10* cfu/ml) , measured on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 2 spectropho- tometer (ϋberlingen, Germany) . The cell suspension was diluted in sterile phosphate buffer to concentrations of 10 5 and 10 3 cfu/ml. Protamine was added to the cell su¬ spensions (10 3 , 10 5 and 10 8 cfu/ml) in concentrations of 0, 50, 100 and 500 μg/ml, and the suspensions were incu- bated at 25°C for 24 h. CALIBRATION CURVES A series 10-fold dilution rate was prepared from the 10 8 cfu/ml suspension with no protamine added. A calibration curve relating cfu/ml of the 10-fold dilutions to capaci¬ tance or conductance DT in TSB was constructed for each strain using a minimum of 8 dilution steps. From the protamine treated suspensions, 0.1 ml was ino¬ culated in TSB in Bactometer wells and the DT determined. This DT was, converted to a colony count using the cali- bration curve. Thus, colony counts were not made directly on the protamine treated suspensions as protamine caused significant clumping of the bacterial cells. When no DT was measured, the total well volume was pi¬ petted onto agar plates to evaluate whether protamine had a bacteriostatic or bacteriocidal effect. Results The MIC values determined from capacitance or conductance DT of cells growing in TSB are shown in Table 2. Table 2: Minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) measured impedi- metric as a total inhibition after 100 hours at 25°C. Strain MIC (μg/ml) Aeromonaε εobria > 4000 Aeromonaε εalmonicidae 4000 Escherichia coli 0157 :H7 1000 Pεeudomonaε aeruginoεa 4000 Pεeudomonaε fluoreεcenε 3000 Shewanella putrefacienε (4 strains) 500-1000 Vibrio anguillarum 1000 Vibrio paraheamolyticus 500-1000 Yersinia ente ocol it ica >4000 Bacillus εubtiliε 100 Brochotrix thermoεphacta 20 Corynebacterium jeikeium 100 Liεteria monocytogenes (2 strains) 1000 Staphylococcuε aureuε (2 strains) 500-1000 The Gram-positive strains were more sensitive to protami- ne than the Gram-negative. The MIC values determined for Gram-positive strains varied from 20 to 1000 μg/ml and varied from 500 μg/ml to more than 4000 μg/ml for the Gram-negative strains. Brochotrix thermoεphacta was the most sensitive strain, and a protamine concentration of 20 μg/ml TSB caused a total kill of the inoculum (10 3 cfu/ml) , measured by pla¬ ting the well volume after 100 h of incubation in the Bactometer. A protamine concentration of 1000 μg/ml re¬ sulted in a 100% lethal effect on the two strains of Li- εteria monocytogeneε and Staphylococcuε aureuε (10 3 cfu/ml) . The MIC for protamine on S . aureus was 500 μg/ml, however, this concentration did not have a lethal effect. The DT's for Aeromonaε εobria and Yerεinia enterocolitica increased with increasing protamine concentration, sug¬ gesting a prolonged lagphase. However, the cultures were not totally inhibited and no MIC was determined. The DT for a 10 3 cfu/ml suspension of A. εobria was 33 h when incubated with 4000 μg/ml compared to 12 h when no pro- tamine was added. For Y. enterocolitica the detection time of 10 3 cfu/ml was prolonged from 21 h to 60 h when 4000 μg/ml of protamine was added, see Figure 1. Aeromo¬ naε εalmonicidae and Pεeudomonaε fluoreεcenε were inhibi¬ ted by protamine in concentrations of 4000 and 3000 μg/ml TSB, respectively. Thus, no change in conductance was seen after 100 hours incubation, but live cells were iso¬ lated from the well. Shewanella putrefacienε (A2) , (All) and (A22) and Vibrio anguillarum were inhibited by pro¬ tamine in the concentration 1000 μg/ml TSB, and ViJrio paraheamolyticuε and S . putrefacienε (A6) were inhibited by 500 μg/ml TSB. S . putrefacienε was the only Gram-nega¬ tive bacteria which was killed by protamine, thus, 2000 μg/ml of protamine killed 100% of the inoculum (10 3 cfu/ml) of all the four tested strains. The bacteriocidal effect of protamine on non-growing cells was tested on four strains of S . putrefacienε and two strains of L . monocytogene . After protamine treat¬ ment, detection times were measured and converted to a cell count using the calibration curve generated for the particulary strain (Fig. 2) . The sensitivity of S. putre- facienε varied from strain to strain, see Table 3 below (see also table 1 for code and reference for each strain) . Strain A2 and All were similar in sensitivity and more resistant than A6 and A22. Thus, 100 μg protamine/ml killed S . putrefacienε strain A6 and A22 when suspended at low cell concentrations (10 5 and 10 3 cfu/ml) . The same level was not 100% lethal on S . putrefacienε strain A2 and All, however the cell number was reduced by 90-99.9%. The initial cell number was estimated by absorcance measurements. Table 3 Number of bacterial cells surviving 24 h protamine treat¬ ment as estimated from capacitance/conductance calibra¬ tion curves. Initial Estimated cell number cell after 24 h of protamine number treatment in 4 concentra- Bacteria Code (cfu/ml) tions of protamine (μg/ml) 100 500 5. A2 10 8 6*10 8 6*10 5 8*10 6 pu trefa ci enε 10 5 8*10 6 ~l c ~l c 10 3 1*10 4 ~l c ~l c A6 10 8 1*10 8 8*10 3 4 *10' 10 5 8*10 4 k k 10 3 3 *10 3 k k All 10 8 5*10 8 3*10 6 2*10 2 10 5 2*10 6 3 1 10 3 3 *10 2 ~l c -l c A22 10 8 6*10 8 2*10 7 1*10 5 10 5 6*10 4 k k 10 3 3 *10 3 k k 032 10 8 9*10 8 8 *10 8 1*10 6 Liεteria 10 s 8*10 6 1*10 6 6*10 5 monocyto- 10 3 2*10 4 4*10 4 5*10 4 geneε 057 10 8 3 *10 8 4 *10 8 3 *10 8 10 s 1*10 6 8*10 4 3*10 5 10 3 5*10 4 2*10 2 3 *10 2 k: No surviving cells (determined by spread plating the medium from the well, c) : Long detection time (DT) corresponding to a very low cell number (approximately 1 surviving cell) . Protamine at 100 and 500 μg/ml had no effect on non- growing L . monocytogenes cells, and increasing the pro- tamine concentration to 1000 μg/ml did not cause any let¬ hal effect of protamine on non-growing L. monocytogeneε . The results show that sal ine (salmon protamine) in con¬ centrations of 100-4000 μg/ml prolonged the lag phase of several Gram-negative bacteria significantly. Protamine was more effective on actively growing L. monocytogeneε cells as compared to cells suspended in buffer. The bac¬ tericidal effect of protamine on Shewanella putrefacienε was seen on both growing and non-growing cells. A pro- tamine concentration of 2000 μg/ml was required to kill growing S . putrefacienε (10 3 cfu/ml) , whereas non-growing cells were killed by only 50 μg/ml. When the cell con¬ centration was raised the bactericidal effect of protami¬ ne was decreased, probably as a result of the higher cell/protamine ratio. The impedimetric method used in this study proved useful for the measurement of the antibacterial activity of a cationic protein which caused cellular agglutination. Excellent correlations exit between detection time and cfu of untreated cells, see Figure 2. The correlation between protamine treated cells and cfu was statistically similar to the correlation for untreated cells (data not shown) , however, plating the protamine treated cells cau- sed a great degree of variation on the cells count. It is demonstrated that protamine inhibits growth of all the tested strains, determined as a prolonged lag phase for the most resistant bacteria or a lethal effect on a few of the tested strains, the Gram-positive bacteria in particular. The fact that protamine is naturally occur¬ ring and non-toxic makes it an antibacterial protein that might hold great promise for the control of e.g. spoilage bacteria and food-borne pathogenes. EXAMPLE 2 Comparison af minimum inhibition concentrations for basic proteins and enzymes The minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) of various- substances was determined as described in Example 1. The following substances were tested: protamine (A) , pro¬ tamine sulphate (B) , a peroxidase enzyme system (i.e. lactoperoxidase/glucoseoxidase (C) ) , subtilisin A (D) , polyarginine (E) having an average molecular weight of about 6 kD and lysozyme (F) (150 000 units/mg; Johansen, C. et al., 1994). The results are shown in Table 4 below. It is demonstrated that protamine and protamine sulphate are very effective substances for inhibiting all the te¬ sted strains, whereas polyarginine is effective for in¬ hibiting all strains but Pεeudomonaε spp.. Apart from the effect of lysozyme on Liεteria monocytogeneε , none of the tested enzyme showed any effect. Table 4: Comparative minimum inhibition concentrations Substance Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (μg/ml) Strain A B C D E F Liεteria 1000 1000 n.e. n.e. 2000 2000 monocytogeneε Staphylococcuε 1000 2000 n.e. n.e. 1500 n.e aureuε Eεcherichia coli 1000 n.d. n.e. n.e. 1500 n.e Pεeudomonaε 4000 n.d. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e aeroginoεa Pεeudomonaε 3000 4000 n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e fluoreεcenε Shewanella 1000 500 n.e. n.e. 1500 n.e putrefacienε Vibrio 1000 500 n.e. n.e. 2000 n.e paraheamol yticuε n.d.: not done n.e.: not effective * The lactoperoxidase system was effective for maximum 70 hours. The definition of MIC require an inhibition of at least 100 hours. EXAMPLE 3 The influence of pH and cell concentration on the anti¬ bacterial effect of protamine The influence of pH on the antibacterial effect of pro¬ tamine was tested using the materials and methods descri- bed in Example 1. The results are shown in Figure 3 and demonstrate clearly that the antibacterial effect of protamine depend signi- ficantly on pH. At low pH, protamine (1 mg/ml) has no ef¬ fect on the Gram-negative bacteria Pεeudomonaε aerougino- εa , however, at high pH protamine (1 mg/ml) prolonged the detection time from 32 to 71 hours. The interaction bet¬ ween pH and protamine has been observed for all the te- sted strains. Further, the influence of cell concentration on the anti¬ bacterial effect of protamine was tested using the ma¬ terials and methods described in Example 1, i.e.the cor- relation between cell concentration and protamine concen¬ tration has been measured by the impedimetric assay. The results are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5 and demon¬ strate clearly that a significant synergistic effect bet- ween the cell concentration and the protamine concentra¬ tion has been observed. Thus, at low cell concentration, protamine (1 mg/ml) caused a prolongation of the detection time from 12 to above 100 hours for the Gram- negative bacteria Shewanella putrefacienε (4 strains) , compared to a prolongation at high cell concentration from 6 to 18 hours. The detection time for the Gram-po¬ sitive bacteria Liεteria monocytogeneε (2 strains) was at low cell concentration prolonged from 18 to 55 hours when treated with protamine (1 mg/ml) , at high cell concentra- tion the same protamine concentration only prolonged the detection time from 4 to 15 hours. EXAMPLE 4 Synergistic antimicrobial effect between a basic protein, a cell-wall degrading enzyme and a peroxidase enzyme system Impedimetric measurements carried out as described in example 1 have shown an synergistic effect between basic peptides as protamine, polyarginine or polylysine and lysozyme and/or glucose oxidase and/or the lactoperoxidase enzyme system depending on pH and NaCl concentration. Growth inhibition experiments were conducted, wherein synergistic and additional effects were determined by mixing compounds in low concentrations not having any activity on their own and using a factoral design. The effects were measured as growth inhibition or a 100% bacteriocidal effect with a total kill of the inoculum. Protamine (250 μg/ml) or polylysine (500 μg/ml) in combi¬ nation with lactoperoxidase (2 U/ml) and glucose oxidase (2 U/ml) had a 100% lethal effect on Pεeudomonaε fluoreεcenε , whereas the same strain was not inhibited when treated with any of these three compounds alone in the concentrations mentioned above. A synergistic effect was as observed against Pεeudomonaε fluorescenε when combining protamine (250 μg/ml) and polylysine (500 μg/ml) and lysozyme (50000 U/ml) and lactoperoxidase (2 U/ml) and glucose oxidase (1 U/ml) or lysozyme (50.000 U/ml) and polylysine (500 μg/ml) and lactoperoxidase (2 U/ml) and glucose oxidase (1 U/ml) . Experiments where the antibacterial effect was measured as growth inhibition of Shewanella putrefacienε in TSB at 25°C and pH 7.2, showed a synergistic effect between protamine and lysozyme; the results are shown in Figure 6 as a response surface plot. Lysozyme alone had no effect on the Gram-negative bacteria Shewanella putrefacienε neither had protamine at concentrations below 500 μg/ml, whereas combinations caused a 100% bactericidal activity at protamine concentrations above 300 μg/ml and lysozyme concentrations from 10 4 -10 6 U/ml (lysozyme activity: 150000 U/mg) . EXAMPLE 5 Fungistatic and fungicidal activities This experiment was carried out as described in example 1 using the Bactometer substrate: 0.75 g Yeast extract (Difco) , 3.0 g D(+)Glucose, 1 g KH 2 P0 4 , 0.8 g isogel agarose IEF (Pharmacia) and 100 ml distilled water. Protamine was added to the substrate immediately before inoculation with a spore suspension of the test fungi (approximately 10 3 -10 4 cfu/ml) . The minimum inhibitory concentration was determined as the lowest concentration of protamine resulting in a absence of DT during 100 h measurement (see table 5 below) . When no DT was determined a fungicidal activity was evaluated by plating from a dilution of the total well volume. Table 5 Strain PH MIC (μg/ml) Alternaria infectoria 5.2 240 Aεpergilluε niger 7.1 1000 Botrytiε aclada 5.2 120 Cladoεporium herbarum 5.2 120 Eurotium repenε 5.2 240 Fuεarium culmorum 5.2 240 Penicillium comcam 6.1 1000 Penicilliu cruεtoεum 6.2 1000 Penicillium roqueforti 5.2 240 ϋlocladium atrum 5.2 240 The fungistatic and fungicidal effect of protamine was optimal at high pH and low inoculum size as the effect on bacteria. Increasing the pH caused a significant decrease in the MIC-value. A fungistatic effect was obtained with an 2-5 fold lower protamine concentration than used when a fungicidal effect was determined. The most resistant strains shown in table 5 were not inhibited by protamine for 100 h at low pH, thus a 100 h inhibition was not obtained before increasing the pH to the values given in the table. EXAMPLE 6 Survival and transfer of bacteria during mini-wash Materials: Ariel Color (DF-9412330) . Swatches (white cotton, DF-9415585) , sterilized by Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB) Sterilized water (12 * dH). Strains: Staphylococcuε aureuε (skin isolate) Pεeudomonaε aeruginoεa (skin isolate) Methods: Inoculum: S . aureuε and P. aeruginoεa were grown in Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB) at 25'C for 30 hours. For each strain six sterile swatches were inoculated with approximately 10 6 cfu/swatch and air dried for 30 minutes. Mini-wash: 0.56 g of Ariel Color was dissolved in 80 ml sterile water (12 * dH, 35 * C) in each wash beaker, giving the final concentration of 7 g/1. Protamine, dissolved in water and filter sterilized, were added to half of the wash beakers giving the final concentration of 500 μg/ml. After 70 sec. 1 inoculated swatch and 2 sterile swatches were transferred to each wash beaker, and washed at 35 * C for 15 min. In one beaker 3 sterile swatches were washed as control. From each wash beaker 0.1 ml of detergent solution were transferred to Malthus (in-direct cells) con¬ taining TSB and incubated. The swatches were rinsed in sterile water for 10 min (stirring). From each beaker 0.1 ml of rinse water were incubated in Malthus (in-direct cells) . were incubated in Malthus (in-direct cells) . After wash all swatches were slightly air dried in sterile air for 10 min, and each swatch was trans- ferred to an in-direct Malthus cell. All materials and instruments except the detergent, were sterilized before use to avoid contamination. In-direct Malthus: Indirect-Malthus measurements were used when estimat¬ ing the number of viable cells. 3 ml of TSB were transferred to the outer chamber of the in-direct Malthus cells, and 0.5 ml of sterile KOH (0.1 M) were transferred to the inner chamber. As cells are growing in the outer chamber they produce C0 2 (g) which will dissolve in the KOH in the inner chamber and thereby change the conductance of the KOH. When the conductance change is measurable by the Malthus, a detection time (DT) will be recorded. The DT's were converted to colony counts by use of a calibration curve relating cfu/ml to DT (see Figure 1 and 2) . A series 10-fold dilution rate was prepared from the 10 8 cfu/ml suspension of cells. Conductance DT of each dilution step was determined in TSB, and a cali¬ bration curve relating cfu/ml of the 10 fold dilu- tions to DT in TSB was constructed for each strain (see Figure 1 and 2) . Results: The number of cells surviving mini-wash, in the detergent solution, attached to the contaminated swatches, trans¬ ferred to the rinse water or to the sterile swatches, were determined by in-direct Malthus (table 6) . A relatively high number of cells were washed of the swatches and found in the wash water, however, approxima¬ tely 10 3 cfu were still attached to the swatches after mini-wash and rinsing for 10 min, and during wash cells were transferred from the contaminated swatch to the sterile swatches. The S . aureus cells were found very sensitive to protamine, which can be explained by the increased antibacterial activity of protamine at high pH. A high number of P. aeruginoεa were determined in the detergent solution, and protamine was found active against the cells in the detergent solution, however, P. aeruginoεa attached to the swatches were not inhibited or killed by protamine, and all the sterile swatches in the washes inoculated with P . aeruginoεa were contaminated during wash. The rinse water were almost sterile, thus the cells may adhere actively to the textile. Table 6: Cell number in the detergent solution, the rinse water, attached to the contaminated swatches and transferred to sterile swatches, before and after mini-wash at 35 * C for 15 min with Ariel Color. Each wash were done in triplets, A, B and C are the three wash beakers with the same combinations of strain and protamine. Staphylococcus aureus Pseudomonas aeruginosa (μg/ml) (μg/ml) 0 500 0 500 Before wash (cfu/swatch) contaminated swatch A 1.6*10* 1 6*10* 4.0*10* 4 .0*10* B 1.6*10 6 1 6*10* 4.0*10* 4 .0*10* C 1.6*10 6 1 6*10* 4.0*10* 4 .0*10* sterile swatch 1 A 0 0 0 0 B 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 sterile swatch 2 A 0 0 0 o B 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 o After mini-wash (cfu/swatch) contaminated swatch A 1.7*10 3 0 8.0*10' 2. 5*10' B 3.0*10 3 0 1.2*10 2 6. 0*10' C 2.9*10 2 0 6.0*10' 1. 3*10' swatch 1 A 1 0 4.0*10 2 1 B 0 0 5.0*10' 1 C 2.8*10 2 0 1 1 swatch 2 A 6.1*10 2 0 7.0*10 2 1 B 1 0 1 1 C 0 0 3.0*10' 1 Detergent solution (cfu/ml) total volume; 80 ml A 2.0*10 3 1 - (a) o B 6.3*10 3 0 5.8*10 5 o C 2.0*10 3 o 1.9*10" o Rinse water (cfu/ml) total volume;100 ml A 0 0 0 1 B o o o 1 c o o 1 o (a) : No DT determined by Malthus, growth in the Malthus cell was observed by eye. From the results it can be concluded that Ariel Color has no significant bactericidal effect on S . aureuε and P. aeruginoεa (pathogenic skin isolates) . A high number of cells were washed of the swatches, and found in the detergent solution, and when no protamine were added, cells from the inoculated swatch contaminated the sterile swatches in the wash beaker. REFERENCES Ben Embarek, P. K. & Huss, H. H. 1993 Heat resistance of Listeria monocytogenes in vacuum packaged pasteurized fish fillets. International Journal of Food Microbiology 20, 85-95. Bierbaum, G. & Sahl, H. G. 1987 Autolytic system of Staphylococcus simulans 22: Influence of cationic peptides on activity of n-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase. Journal of Bacteriology 169, 5452-5458. Bierbaum, G. & Sahl, H. G. 1991 Induction of autolysis of Staphylococcus simulans 22 by Pep5 and nisin and influen- ce of the cationic peptides on the activity of the auto¬ lytic enzymes. In Niεin and novel antibiotics ed. Jung, G. & Sahl, H. G, p. 347-358. ESCOM, Leiden. Brange, J. 1987 Galenicε of inεulin . Ch. 3, pp. 34-36. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Christensen, B. , Fink, J., Merrifield, R. B. & Mauzerall, D. 1988 Channel-forming properties of cecropins and rela¬ ted model compounds incorporated into planar lipid mem- branes. Proceedingε of the National Academy of Scienceε of the United Stateε of America 85, 5072-5076. Chung, Steen & Hansen, (1994) . Subtilisin gene of Bacil¬ lus subtilis ATCC 6633 is incoded in an operon that contains homologues of the hemolysin B transport protein, J. Bact., Vol. 174 (1994), p. 1414-1422. Connolly, P., Bloomfield, S. F. & Denyer, S. P. 1993 A study of the use of rapid methods for preservative effi- cacy testing of pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 75, 456-462. Farrag, S. A. & Marth, E. H. 1992 Escherichia coli 0157:H7, Yersinia enterocolitica and their control in milk by the lactoperoxidase system: a review. Lebenεmit- tel-Wiεεenεchaft und Technologie 25, 201-211. Firstenberg-Eden, R. & Eden, G. 1984 Impedance microbio¬ logy. Letchworth: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Gram, L. , Wedell-Nedergaard, C. & Huss, H. H. 1990 The bacteriology of fresh and spoiling Lake Victorian Nile perch (Lates niloticus) . International Journal of Food Microbiology 10, 303-316. Hitsch, J. G. 1958 Bactericidal action of histone. Jour- nal of experimental medicine 108, 925-944. Horrow, J. C. 1985 Protamine: A review of its toxicity. Anaeεtheεia Analgeεia 64, 51-55. Hugo, W. B. 1978 Membrane-active antimicrobial drugs - a reappraisal of their mode of action in the light of the chemosmotic theory. International Journal of Pharmaceu- ticε 1, 127-131. Islam, N. MD. , Itakura, T. & Motohiro, T. 1984 Antibac¬ terial spectra and minimum inhibition concentration of clupeine and salmine. Bulletin of the Japaneεe Society of Scientific Fisheries 50, 1705-1708. Jaques, L. B. 1973 Protamine - antagonist to heparin. Canadian Medical Aεεociation Journal 108, 1291-1297. Jeong, D. K. , Harrison, M. A., Frank, J. F. & Wicker, L. 1992 Trials on the antibacterial effect of glucose oxida- se on chicken breast skin and muscle. Journal of Food εafety 13, 43-49. Jeppesen, V. F. & Huss, H. H. 1993 Characteristics and antagonistic activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from chilled fish products. International Journal of Food Microbiology 18, 305-320. Johansen, C, Gram, L. & Meyer, A. S. 1994 The combined inhibitory effect of lysozyme and low pH on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes. Journal of Food Protection , in press. Jørgensen, B. R. 1986 Sorbic acid - effect on fish - in¬ fluence of pH on the effect. Masters thesis (in Danish) . Technological Laboratory, Danish Ministry of Fisheries, Technological University of Denmark. Jørgensen, B. R. & Huss, H. H. 1989 Growth and activity of Shewanella putrefaciens isolated from spoiling fish. International Journal of Food Microbiology 9, 51-62. Kagan, B. L. , Selsted, m. E. , Ganz, T. & Lehrer, R. I. 1990 Antimicrobial defensin peptides from voltage-depen¬ dent ion-permeable channels in planar lipid bilayer mem¬ branes. Proceedingε of the National Academy of Scienceε of the United Stateε of America 87, 210-214. Knøchel, S. 1989 Aeromonas spp. - ecology and significan¬ ce in food and water hygiene. Ph.D. thesis. Technological Laboratory and the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural Uni¬ versity, Frederiksberg, Denmark. Kossel, A. 1928 The protamines and histones, Longmans, Green and Co., London, New York, Toronto, 1-63. Lehrer, R. I., Lichtentstein, A. K. & Ganz, T. 1993 De- fensins: Antimicrobial and cytotoxic peptides of animal cells. Annual i?evieιv of Immunology 11, 105-128. Nakae, T. 1985 Outer-membrane permeability of bacteria. In Critical Reviewε in Microbiology ed. O'Leary, W. M. , pp. 1-62. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, Inc. Phillips, L. G. , Yang, S. T. , Schulman, W. & Kinsella, J. E. 1989 Effect of lysozyme, clupeine, and sucrose on the foaming properties of whey protein isolate and 0-lactag- lobulin. Journal of Food Science 54, 743-747. Rodman, T. C. , Pruslin, F. H. & Allfrey, V. G. 1984 Pro- tamine-DNA association in mammalian Spermatozoa. Experi¬ mental Cell Reεearch 150, 269-281. Sahl, H. G. 1987 Influence of the staphylococci-like pep- tide Pep5 on membrane potential of bacterial cells and cytoplasmic membrane vesicles. Journal of Bacteriology 162, 833-836. Trevors, J. T. 1986 Bacterial growth and activity as in- dicators of toxicity. In Toxicity teεting uεing microor- ganisms ed. Bitton, G. & Dutka, B. J. Boca Raton, Flori¬ da: CRC Press, Inc. Vaara, M. 1992 Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane. Microbiological Reviewε 56, 395-411. Vaara, M. & Vaara, T. 1983 Polycations as outer membrane- disorganizing agents. Antimicrobial Agentε and Chemother¬ apy 24, 114-122. Weisner, B. 1984 Lysozyme (muramidase) . In Methodε of En¬ zymatic Analyεiε Vol. 4, ed. Bergmeyer, H. U. pp. 189- 195. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie. Yanagimoto, T., Tanaka, M. & Nagashima, Y. 1992 Changes in the antibacterial activity of salmine during Its Mail- lard reaction. Bulletin of the Japaneεe Society of Scien¬ tific Fiεherieε 58, 2153-2158.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A bactericidal, bacteriostatic, fungicidal and/or fun¬ gistatic composition comprising or consisting essentially of a basic protein or peptide capable of killing microbi¬ al cells in combination with a cell-wall degrading enzyme and/or an oxidoreductase. 2. The composition according to claim 1 , wherein the ba- sic protein has an amino acid sequence consisting of ami- no acids normally occurring in mammalian cells. 3. The composition according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the basic protein is of biological or microbiological origin. 4. The composition according to any of the claims 1-3, wherein the basic protein is recovered from biological material. 5. The composition according to any of the claims 1-3, wherein the basic protein is a recombinant protein. 6. The composition according to any of the claims 1-5, wherein the basic protein is selected from the group con- sisting of protamines, protamine sulphates, defensins, magainins, melittin, cecropins and protegrins. 7. The composition according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the basic peptide is a synthesized polypeptide selected from the group consisting of polylysins and polyarginins and co-polymers thereof. 8. The composition according to any of the claims 1-7, wherein the cell-wall degrading enzyme is selected from the group consisting of endoglycosidases Type II, lysozy- mes and chitinases. 9. The composition according to any of the claims 1-8, wherein the oxidoreductase is selected from the group consisting of oxidases (EC 1.10.3) and peroxidases (EC 1.11.1), preferably from peroxidase enzyme systems (EC 1.11.1.7) and laccase enzymes (EC 1.10.3.2). 10. The composition according to any of the claims 1-9, wherein the peroxidase enzyme system comprises at least one peroxidase enzyme and a hydrogen peroxide generating enzyme system such as an oxidase and a substrate for the oxidase or an amino acid oxidase and a suitable amino acid, or a peroxycarboxylic acid or a salt thereof. 11. A cleaning or detergent composition comprising a ba- sic protein or peptide capable of killing microbial cells and a surfactant. 12. The composition according to claim 11 which further comprises a cell-wall degrading enzyme and/or an oxidoreductase. 13. The composition according to claim 11, wherein the basic protein has an amino acid sequence consisting of amino acids normally occurring in mammalian cells. 14. The composition according to claim 11 or 12, wherein the basic protein is selected from the group consisting of protamines, protamine sulphates, defensins, magainins, melittin, cecropins, protegrins, and synthesized polypep- tides such as polylysins and polyarginins. 15. The composition according to any of the claims 11-14, wherein the cell-wall degrading enzyme is selected from the group consisting of endoglycosidases Type II and muramidases such as lysozymes and chitinases; and/or the oxidoreductase is selected from peroxidase enzyme systems (EC 1.11.1.7) and laccase enzymes (EC 1.10.3.2). 16. The composition according to any of the claims 11-15, wherein the peroxidase system comprises at least one peroxidase enzyme and a hydrogen peroxide generating en¬ zyme system such as an oxidase and a substrate for the oxidase or an amino acid oxidase and a suitable amino acid, or a peroxycarboxylic acid or a salt thereof. 17. The composition according to any of the claims 11-16, which further comprises at least one enzyme selected from the group consisting of proteases, amylases, cellulases, and Upases. 18. The composition according to any of the claims 11-17, wherein the surfactant is a detergent surfactant, pre- ferably selected from the group consisting of anionic, nonionic, ampholytic, zwitterionic and cationic surfac¬ tants. 19. The composition according to any of the claims 14-18, wherein the basic protein is a protamine or a protamine sulphate in an amount effective for killing cells or in¬ hibiting growth of cells, preferably in an amount corre¬ sponding to between 1 and 4000 mg per 1 cleaning liquor or washing liquor, more preferably between l and 2000 mg per 1 cleaning liquor or washing liquor, especially bet¬ ween 5 and 1000 mg per 1 cleaning liquor or washing li¬ quor. 20. A method for killing microbial cells present on a hard surface comprising contacting the surface with a cleaning composition according to any of the claims 11-19 or a composition according to any of the claims 1-10, preferably a composition comprising a protamine or a pro¬ tamine sulphate. 21. A method for killing microbial cells or inhibiting growing microbial cells present on laundry comprising contacting the laundry with a detergent composition ac¬ cording to any of the claims 11-19 or a composition according to any of the claims 1-10, preferably a compo¬ sition comprising a protamine or a protamine sulphate. 22. A method for preservation of food, beverages, cosme¬ tics, contact lens products, food ingredients or enzyme compositions comprising incorporating into the unpreser¬ ved food, beverages, cosmetics, contact lens products, food ingredients or enzyme compositions a basic protein or basic peptide or a composition according to any of the claims 1-10 in an amount effective for inhibiting growing microbial cells, preferably a protamine or a protamine sulphate or a composition comprising a protamine or a protamine sulphate. 23. A method of killing microbial cells present on human or animal skin, mucous membranes, wounds, bruises or in the eye comprising contacting the cells to be killed with a basic protein or peptide in an amount effective for killing the cells, preferably a protamine or protamine sulphate, or a composition according to any of the claims 1-10 or 11-19.

Inventors: JOHANSEN CHARLOTTE, JOHANSEN, CHARLOTTE
Applicants: JOHANSEN CHARLOTTE, NOVONORDISK AS, JOHANSEN, CHARLOTTE, NOVO NORDISK A/S
Application year: 1995
Main classification: A01N63
IPC codes: A01N37, A01N63, A01N65, A23L2, A23L3, A61K8, A61K38, A61P17, A61P27, A61P31, A61Q5, A61Q17, C11D3, C11D7