MAINS SIGNALLING SYSTEMS

Abstract: A remote electricity metering system is known in which a central station (LC) communicates with meters (U1-U13) over the mains (10-14), with messages to remote meters being relayed by intermediate meters and the route of a message being determined by the central station. The present system provides alarm signalling whereby the meters can communicate direct with the central station. Each meter can generate a respective combination of alarm frequencies, preferably sequentially and inside the frequency band used for normal messaging, and the local controller monitors the mains for those frequencies. An error detecting and/or correcting code can be used for the alarm frequency combinations. The central stationpolls the meter or meters sending the alarm. The meters are microprocessor-based, with the normal message signals and the alarm frequencies being synthesized from a sequence of digital values by a D/A converter.

Description: Mains Signalling -=3y»-b« The present invention relates primarily to mains signalling systems, though it is also applicable to other systems having similar characteristic-.. (The term "mains" applies primarily to the final consumer voltage portions of an electricity supply network, though the signalling can also extend over the higher voltage distribution parts of the network ) Such signalling is termed mams, mainsborne, or power line carrier (PLC) signalling. Remote metering A major application or mains signalling is remote meter reading, operated by electricity generating and distribution companies (electricity utilities). The term remote meter reading' refers to what is normally the major function of such systems, but they may also be concerned more generally with load and system control. Also, while they will usually be concerned primarily with electricity meters, gas and other meters can in principle be coupled to the mains for this purpose (preferably through electricity meters). A typical simple remote meter reading system will have a central station or local controller .which can conveniently be located at a distribution transformer) which communicates over the mains with the meters (meter stations) of the various premises (largely household or domestic and small commercial) on the mains. Such systems normally use some form of frequency modulation (m the broad sense). There is in fact an international standard now for such signalling, using frequencies in the general region of 3 - 150 kHz. (The standard is CENE EC EN50065.1, which specifies that frequencies in the band 3 - 148.5 kHz are available for signalling on low voltage electrical installations. This bandwidth is divided into several smaller bands with various uses arid permissions associated with them; for example, the 9 - 95 kHz band is reserved for electricity suppliers and their licencees.) Any suitable form of signalling can be chosen within that standard. One convenient form is FSK ( frequency shift keying), in which information is trans- itted by switching between two predetermined frequencies. This requires suit¬ able signal generators and detectors. The meters will normally be microprocessoi — based With such a meter, a convenient technique for signal generation is to use a digital-to-analog converter which is driven by a sequence of values defining a sine wave, obtained eg by reading them from a memory at a suitable rate; the signal frequency can be con¬ trolled by varying the reading rate. Good control of the waveform can readily tie achieved, using say 8-bit words, say 128 or 256 samples defining a quartet — wave, and division down from say a 10 MHz clock Signal detection requires detection of the two signalling frequencies This can be achieved by providing fixed tuned circuits, alternatively, integrated circuits are available which are designed for such frequency signal detection Mains signalling systems have two major problems- noise and attenuation. Mains noise arises from loads being switched on and off arid the inherent characteristics of certain types ot loads The noise problem can generally be overcome by a variety of known techniques, such as error detection and correc¬ tion techniques, requiring acknowledgement of reception, and repetition of lost messages. (Some of these techniques also deal with problems of message col¬ lision.) Dissipation or attenuation at the preferred signal frequencies is significant; it is dependent on the particular operating conditions of the mains network and varies according for example to the loading of the network. The attenuation will often be irregular; there may for example be "dead spots', due eg to signal reflections, close to the signal source while communication to more distant loca¬ tions is still reasonably reliable. A system which largely overcomes these problems has been proposed in our earlier patent application no. PCT/GB94/01391, WO 95/01030. In that system, which we will for convenience call the 'standard system", substantially all meters have a repeater function The present system is a broadly a development of or improvement on that system. The topology of the standard system will normally be branched. That is, the central station will normally communicate directly with several meters, each of those will normally communicate with several further meters, and so on. ( The topology of the commun ication system i s somewhat abstract, and must be distin¬ guished from the physical or network topology of the mains network which sup¬ ports the communication system. We will normal ly be concerned with the former, and will use the term "topology" alone for the former.) A major feature of the standard system is that the message routing — ie the determination of the routes which messages take through the network is determined substantially entirely by the central station. This i s the only station with any significant knowledge of the topology of the system, and is also the only station which can initiate a message. The central station i ncludes, i n each message, a route i n the form of a meter list a list of the meters through which the message is to pass. To read a meter (or otherwise communicate with it), the central station sends out a message to the meter, which i nserts its reading into the message and sends it back to the central station. For present pur poses, the route — the meter list — can be taken as remai ni ng unchanged i n the message throughout the message's journey to the desti nation meter and back agai n to the central station. (In fact, the standard system preferably uses sl i ght variations on this.) The standard system can determi ne the topology of the system by means of search messages, and can readily be made adaptive to changes of topology. This is particularly important for mai ns meter reading. The transmi ssion charactei — istics of the mai ns network are l iable to change (over time periods of the order of minutes to hours ) . Also, there wi ll be occasional changes i n the number and locations of the meters of the system, and the mai ns network itself may be extended or modified over time. All these types of changes wi ll change the topology of the system. The local control ler may fi nd difficulty in communicating with a meter; it may get no response after several re-sends, or it may have to re-send for most messages to that meter. I n that case, it uses the its knowledge of the topology to try to find an alternati ve route to the meter. Various techniques for route selection are described in the standard system, and a further technique is des¬ cribed in our copendi ng application G B 94.16688, filed 18 August 1 994. Alarm signalling There are various situations where it is desirable for a meter to be able to inform the local controller urgently of some condition at the meter. The condi¬ tion of interest may be some condition arising from the operation of the electri¬ city utilization system in the premises served by the meter, or it may be some extraneous condition which is si gnalled to the meter either automatically by some apparatus coupled to it or by a user. Such signals may for example be alarm signals, eg from a burglar alarm system or from an emergency control operable by the user. For convenience, we wi ll term all such signals alarm signals. It is obviously i mportant for such alarm signals to reach the local control¬ ler promptly. However, in the standard system, communication is strictly one¬ way, in the sense that the only unit which can initiate messaging is the local controller. The meters cannot initiate any messages; they can only respond to messages originating f rom the local controller. In a small network, the standard system can be adapted to accommodate alarm signals by the local controller polli ng all meters on a regular basis. Provided the network is small enough, the polling cycle (ie the time required for all meters to be polled) will be short, and a meter with an alarm condition can merely wait until it is polled and then report the alarm condition in the return message. With a large network, however, the polli ng cycle may be too long for this tech¬ nique to be satisfactory. Some other technique is therefore required. One approach is to enable each meter to initiate a message when an alarm condition occurs. However, this involves difficulties in ensuring that the message will reach the local controller. As discussed above, each message includes a meter list which defines its route through the system. In the basic form of the standard system, this meter list is maintained unchanged throughout the life of the message. (It is pointed out in the description of the standard system that addresses can be dropped from the meter list on the return journey of the message from the meter back to the local controller.) For meters to be able to send alarm messages to the local controlleri each meter must retain this address list, and insert it in any alarm message. But In a large system, the polling period (ie the period between successi ve messages to a gi ven meter) may be substantial, and it may be desirable for the message fre¬ quency to different meters to be different, which will further increase the effec¬ ti ve polling period for some meters. The address list held in a meter may therefore be old and so no longer valid when the alarm condition occurs, so the reliability of this technique is unacceptably low for many applications. Further, such alarm messages may fail to reach the local controller as a result of transient noise or of collision with some different message also passing through the network (from the local control ler to some other meter or back from that meter to the local controller). The alarmed meter must therefore incorpor¬ ate some mechanism for repeati ng the alarm message, and it is dif ficult to set the delay i n that mec hani sm. I f the delay i s less than than the t i me taken for the alarm message to reach the local control ler pl us the same time for the response message to reach the meter from the local control ler, the repeat of the alarm signal is liable to collide with that response signal. But for a meter which is distant from the local controller, th i s delay becomes i nconveniently large. A further variant of routing control is also descri bed i n the standard system, where addresses are deleted one by one from the meter l ist i n the message on its outbound journey and retained i n the meters through which the message passes. On the return journey of the message, each meter though which it passes uses the retai ned address to forward the message to the next meter on its retu rn journey to the local controller. If this variant is in use, alarm message routing can use the addresses stored in the meters (one per meter) which are already present. However, the reliability of alarm message routing is still unsati sfactory with this variant. Although meters close to the local control ler will have recent, and hence reasonably rel iable, return route addresses, the reliability of the return addresses in meters at the end of long (multi-hop) paths will be little better than before. A possible solution to this problem of reliability is for alarm messages to be broadcast rather than following strictly defined paths to the local controller. However, this causes further problems. In particular, excessi ve multi plication of copies of the alarm message i s l i kely to occur as it spreads through the system. Some means must be prov ided for l i miting this multi lication and eventually quenching of the number of copies of the message, and multiple copies of the message may result in frequent collisions and hence delay the transmission of the message. The object of the present invention is to provide an improved method of alarm signalling in the standard system. The present invention According to the present invention there is provided a standard system or the like wherein the local controller includes means for monitoring the mains for a set of alarm frequencies and each meter includes means for generating a res¬ pective combination of those frequencies. As noted above, the meters are preferably microprocessor-based, with the normal message signals being synthesized from a sequence of digital values by a digital-to-analog converter. Such a frequency synthesizer can of course be used to generate the alarm frequencies. The present alarm system thus requires no additions to or modifications of the hardware of the meters; all that is required is a modification to the program stored therein. It is possible for the meter to generate a simultaneous combination of alarm frequencies, by synthesizing a combined waveform for all the frequencies. How¬ ever, it is simpler and more convenient for the frequencies to be generated sequentially. This option (sequential frequencies) will be assumed from here on. When the local controller detects frequencies in the set of alarm frequen¬ cies, it can determine, from the particular combination of frequencies detected, which meter has the alarm condition. It preferably then interrupts normal mes¬ saging and attends to the alarm condition by sending a message to the alarmed meter, so that that meter knows that its alarm has been received. The alarmed meter will normally insert more detailed information about the alarm into the message for return to the local controller. It will be noticed that the alarm signalling from the meters to the local controllers is direct; there is no relaying of the alarm frequency signals. This is in contrast to the normal messaging, where relaying over several hops may be required. Normal messaging involves bit rates which may be in the region of 15 kHz, and signal attenuation can easily reduce such signals to levels below those at which they can be reliably detected. When a meter has an alarm condi¬ tion, however, it emits its particular sequential combination of frequencies, as continuous tones. Although these signals are similarly attenuated, their attenuation is unlikely to be be complete. The local controller need only detect the presence or absence of these tones, and can effectively integrate the signals over long periods, of the order of 1 s. Obviously the size of the network to which the present alarm system can be applied is not unlimited. However, we have found that in practice, the present alarm system works satisfactorily for networks of all reasonable sizes. The bit rate ot normal messaging may be fairly high, up to say 15 kHz. The bandwidth required for normal messaging is therefore at least 15 kHz. lit may be considerably larger, since, in simple systems, the messaging may generate various harmonics, and reasonable margins must be allowed for tolerances, etc.) For the single tones used for alarm signalling, however, the bandwidth is very much less, of the order of 100 Hz for each alarm frequency. The bandwidth ratio between the two signalling systems may thus approach something in the region of 1000 for each alarm frequency individually. Assu¬ ming that the noise in the system is roughly white, this means that the alarm signalling system will withstand attenuations getting on for 1000 times the tolerable attenuation of the normal messaging system. This means that there will be no difficulty is detecting the alarm tones and distinguishing them from the normal messaging signals. (In other "words, the alarm tones will effectively propagate several times as far through the network as the normal messages before reaching the limit of detectability, as noted above.) A significant feature of the present alarm signalling system is that it can use the same frequency band as the normal messaging. This means that any other mains signalling systems are unaffected. The detection of the alarm fre¬ quencies will not be significantly affected by the presence of normal messaging signals, because the amount of messaging signal energy within any single narrow alarm frequency band is small. in other words, the system can discriminate adequately between normal messaging signals and alarm signals even though they occupy the same (broad) frequency band. Normal message signalling uses frequencies typically in the region of 50 to 100 kHz and, as discussed above, uses a bandwidth typically in the region of 50 kHz. A bandwidth of 100 Hz for each alarm frequency is equivalent to a minimum separation of 100 Hz between adjacent alarm frequencies Allowing for guard bands to separate the alarm frequencies and keeping the total alarm fre¬ quency band in the central region of the signalling frequency band, the number of alarm frequencies will thus typically be in the region of 100. By using sequences of 3 frequencies, in principle this therefore allows 106 meters to be uniquely identified. This is more than adequate for even a large system, which may have some thousands of meters. However, it is undesirable for a meter to use the same frequency twice in its alarm sequence With a -.ingle frequency, there is a slight danger of a freak total attenuation of the alarm frequency signal between the meter and the local controller. With 3 frequencies, the chance of such a freak total attenuation occurring for all frequencies ι-> negligible Of course, if the local controller does not detect all the alarm signal frequencies, it will not be able to identify the meter uniquely However, from the frequency or frequencies which it does detect, it will be able to effect a partial identification, and it can then poll those meters which have the detected frequency or frequencies to discover which of them has an alarm condition. If desired, the sequences of frequencies assigned to the meters may be assigned according to an error detecting or correcting code, chosen to enable missing frequencies to be detected and/or corrected. Although the sequences of frequencies assigned to the meters are distinc¬ tive of the meters, they need not necessarily be unique; two or more meters may share the same combination of frequencies When the local controller detects such a particular combination of alarm frequencies, it will then have to poll the meters with that particular combination to discover which of them has the alarm condition. (Preferably it polls the entire group of meters with that combination, just in case more than one of them has an alarm condition.) The local controller must monitor the mains network continuously for all frequencies of the set used for alarm signalling. This requires fairly elaborate circuitry. It will be realized, however, that a single local controller may monitor well over 1000 meters. The cost of the monitoring circuitry in the local con¬ troller is therefore only a very small fraction of the total cost of the system. The present alarm signalling system can also be adapted for general back¬ ground monitoring of the transmission characteristics of the mains system. Specific Embodiment A remote meter reading system embodying the invention will now be des¬ cribed, by way of example, with reference to the drawings, in which Fig. 1 shows a mains power distribution network and metering system, Fig. 2 shows the topology of the Fig 1 system, Fig. 3 is a simplified block diagram of a meter of the Fig 1 system; and Fig. 4 is a simplified block diagram of the local controller of the Fig I system. The standard system Fig. 1 shows a mains networl- powered from a substation 1U The network comprises a main branch 11 connected to the substation 10 via a line 12, a second branch 13, and a loop branch 14. A central station (local controller) LC is connected to the network adjacent to the substation 10, and various user con¬ sumption meters Ul-Ull are connected throughout the network as shown. All the meters can also act as relay units. In practice, the mains network will typically extend over an area of the order of 1 km in diameter, and the number of meters will typically be in the region of 100 to 1000. Fig. 2 shows a typical topology for this network The local controller LC can communicate with meters UI-U3; meter Ul can communicate onwards with meters U4 and U5; and so on. This tree corresponds roughly with the physical closeness of the meters in the physical network of Fig. 1, but the correspondence will in general not be exact. In practice, the maximum path length, ie the maximum number of hops required for the local controller to reach a meter, will typically be 3 or 4. In some systems, however, the number of hops required to reach the most remote meter may be considerably greater than that To read the contents of a meter or to control it, the local controller sends a message to the meter, and the meter returns the message suitably modified. The message format comprises three main fi elds: a command field, a route field, and a data field. The route field defi nes the pat h which the message is to take through the system from the local controller to the rneter and back again, and comprises a control subfield and a meter list — a sequence of meter addresses defining that path. The control subfield includes a direction i ndicator (eg O for outbound and I for inbound), a meter list length, and a marker which is effectively moved along the meter list as the message moves through the system to indicate the next meter which is to receive it as the message passes through the system. Thus for a message being sent to meter U7, for example, the data path field wi l l i nitial ly consi st of a control subf ield 0-3-2 and a meter l ist LC-U3-U7 In the control subfield, the first c haracter, O, indicates that the message is an out¬ bound one, the second is the label sequence length, and the third i s the poi nter The following table summarizes the progress of the message. 1 : LC → U3 117 2 : LC U3 - U 7 3 : LC U3 « - U7 4 : LC*- U3 U7 Thi s shows the four stages i n the outward and return journeys of the message, with an arrow in place of the control subfield to i ndicate both the active address and the direction of travel. At each stage, the message wi ll normally be recei ved by several stations, but only the station which matches the active add¬ ress accepts and (except for the local controller) retransmits it Alarm signalling The normal messaging system thus has a complicated topology (Fig. 2), and message transmission frequently in vol ves relaying over multi ple hops. In con¬ trast * the alarm system has a simple topology in which all meters are coupled directly to the local controller. Meter Fig. 3 is a block diagram of a typical meter 10. This is coupled to the mains network 1 1 to both recei ve si gnals from it and transmit signals to it. For receiving signals, there is a f requency detector 2 1 , which i s fed from the mains and coupled to logic circuitry shown as a general logic block 21. For transmitting signals, there is a transmitter unit 22 which is dri ven from the logic block 20 and drives the mai ns. The transmitter unit 22 includes a memory 25 coupled to a di gital-to-analog converter 26 which drives a dri ver amplifier 27 which feeds the mains. The memory 25 contains a stored sequence of values representing a si ne wave; there may for example be 512 storage locations each contai ning an 8-bιt value. The memory is driven by a scale-of-5 1 counter 28, which cyclicall y reads out its contents. The D/A converter 26 wi ll thus synthesize a sine wave of a frequency eq ual to that of the cycle period of counter 28. In practice, this basic technique wi ll be modi fied by mi nor i mprovements. For example, smoothi ng may be applied to the D/A output; there may be a level shift between the D/A converter and the dri ver 27, to convert positi ve signals to si gnals with a zero voltage mean; the memory 25 may contain only a quarter-wave set of values, with the counter 28 counti ng up and down alternatel y, and with a switched inverter included to generate the negative-going sine wave half-cycles; and so on. These detai ls are not of particular importance for present purposes. A clock si gnal generator 30 such as a crystal oscil lator generates clock pulses at a high frequency (eg 1 0 MHz). These are di vided down by a settable di vider 31 to produce the counti ng pul ses which dri ve the counter 28. The di vision rate of the divider 31 is determined by a rate value sent to it. For normal message si gnall i ng, the logic unit 2 1 generates a bit stream which is fed to a signal frequency selector unit 32. Unit 32 contai ns two pre- stored frequency values which are passed to the variable frequency di vider 31 at the appropriate times to cause the transmitter unit 22 to generate the desired FSK signals which carry the bit stream coming from the logic unit 21. The two signal frequency values stored in the signal frequency selector unit 32 ere common to all meters. ( When the logic unit 2 1 is not sendi ng a message, the transmitter unit is put into a quiescent state in which its output is steady.) For alarm signalling, the logic unit 2 1 sends an alarm signal to an alarm control unit 35. This includes an alarm frequency selector unit 36, which contai ns three pre-stored frequency val ues. A counter 37 Is i nitiated by the signal from the logic unit _. ! , and selects the three alarm frequency value* i sequence; after that sequence, the transmitter unit is put into the quiescent state. Thus on an alarm, the transmitter u nit sends out the sequence of alarm fre¬ quencies. The three alarm frequency values stored in the alarm frequency selector 36 form a sequence which is distincti ve of the particular meter. Further, the count rate of the alarm counter 37 is slow enough to hold each of the three alarm frequencies steady for a time which is at a minimum the i nverse of the accuracy with which the alarm f requencies are defined, and is preferably very considerably more. Thus for a f requency band for each alarm si gnal of 100 Hz, as di scussed above, the minimum time for which each alarm frequency must be generated is 0.01 s. To allow the local controller to i ntegrate its detection of alarm signals, however, each alarm f requency is preferably generated for at least an order of magnitude longer than this, a convenient time is between 0.1 and 1 s. The meter is preferably microprocessor-based, and many of the components descr i bed may be implemented by su itable m icroprocessor techni ques Local Controller Fig. 4 is a block diagram of the local control ler LC. This i ncl udes a logic unit 4 1 , which is coupled to the mai ns network 12 v ia a frequency detector 40 and a transmitter unit 42 (similar to the frequency detector 20 and the trans¬ mitter unit 22 of the meters). These units allow the local control ler to perform normal messaging. In addition, the local controller includes a multi-channel alarm frequency detector 43, which detects the alarm frequencies and passes the detected frequencies on to a decoder 44 which stores the frequency sequences of the meters and so identifies, from a recei ved alarm frequency sequence, the meter which produces that sequence. The requirements for the normal messaging signal frequency detector 40 and the alarm frequency detector 43 differ widely. The normal messaging signal frequency detector has to detect the two f requencies of the FSK system at a rate which matches the bit rate (up to 15 kHz), and its discrimination has to be adequate only to distinguish between the two message si gnal frequencies at rela¬ ti vely high signal levels. The alarm f requency detector 43 has to detect and di scriminate between a large number of frequencies with hi gh accuracy, and preferably also includes integrati ng (.accumulator ) means for i ntegrating the recei ved signals over periods typically between 0.1 and 1 s so that it can detect alarm signals at low (near noise) signal levels. The two frequency detectors are therefore in practice separate units. The alarm frequency detector 43 may for example comprise of a set of tuned circuits or a frequency analyzer, or it may be implemented digital ly, eg by means of a fast Fourier transform unit. Multiple alarms It may happen that two or more meters generate alarms simultaneously. The local controller is preferably designed so that it can cope with at least some such situations. One of the alarm frequencies of a particular sequence may be almost com¬ pletely attenuated at the local controller. As noted above, this situation can be dealt with by the local controller determining which meters have sequences including those alarm frequencies which have been detected and polling them. (This is of course not a true multi ple alarm situation.) Assuming that an alarm sequence consists of 3 successive frequencies, this can be represented as 1- 1- 1 , where each number indicates the number of frequen¬ cies detected for that time slot. If two such sequences overlap, then the result is li kely to be 1 - 1-2- 1- 1 , 1 -2-2- 1 , or 2-2-2. Such sequences can clearly be analysed into their two component sequences, with little or no ambiguity for l- l- 2- 1- 1 , perhaps a significant degree of ambiguity for 1 -2-2- 1 , and possibly serious ambiguity for 2-2-2. A sequence such as 1-2- 1- 1 can si milarly be analysed, the 1 (in place of a 2) in the third place indicating that the third alarm frequency of the first sequence and the second alarm f requency of the second sequence are the same. Alternatively, the 1 in the third place may indicate that one of the frequencies which should have been detected was almost completely attenuated. The alarm signal strengths can also be monitored, to assist in separating the two sequences of frequencies. If a sequence 1-2-2-1 is actually a sequence S-(S+W)-(S+W)-W, where S and W represent readily distinguishable signals strengths Strong and Weak, the two component sequences ΛΓ<S probably S-S-S-0 and 0-W-W-W. However, the transmission characteristics of the mains network may be different for different frequencies, so the usefulness of this technique depends on how different the two si gnal strengths are and how different the various alarm frequencies are. Also, if the two sequences happen to have the same frequency in the same time slot, the signals from the two meters may combine βdditively or subtractively at the ti me slot. Preferably, however, the period of each alarm frequency (ie the period for which it is generated) is several times the period over which it can be detected by the local controller. This allows the local control ler not only to detect the occurrence of an alarm frequency but also to monitor how its amplitude varies over the time for which it is present. Since the meters are not sync hronized with each other, i f two meters do send alarm signals together, their alarm frequency periods will normally start at di fferent instants. So if two alarm frequency sequences over lap, the local controller will often be able to separate the two sequences by correlating the timings of different alarm frequency signals; those alarm f requencies whose timi ngs are separated by exact multiples of the alarm frequency period are com¬ ponents of the same sequence of alarm frequencies. The amplitude waveform (en velope) for a single alarm frequency should have the form of a square wave whose length i s that of the alarm frequency period. If the envelope is found to be a somewhat i rregular wave of length substantial ly greater than the normal length, it is probably the result of two separate alarm signals of the same f requency, and the two ends of the envelope can be taken as the two separate alarm si gnals from different meters. The local controller can thus also often cope with overlappi ng alarm sequences in which one (or more) frequencies are the same i n the two sequences. If some other alarm frequency has a well-shaped envelope, then it is pro¬ bably from a single meter. The ti ming of this envelope can then be used to hel p to analyse an irregular envelope at some other alarm frequency. If several alarm frequencies have been detected, then the possible meters from which they may have come can be determi ned, and those meters polled. This may be time-consuming, but the number of meters to be polled will normally be considerably fewer than the total number of meters in the system. If polling has to be performed, then it i s preferably sequenced to poll the meters i n order of i ncreasing hop length. This does not affect the worst case (which is where the alarmed meter is the last one polled), but it does reduce the average time required to discover the alarmed meter. There may of course be extreme situations in which alarm storms occur (ie where many alarms appear at the same time). It may not then be possible to identify the alarmed meters from an analysis of the alarm frequency signals. The present system is therefore unsuitable for use for eg home voting systems in which a large number of users vote (in response to say a television program) withi n a short time. However, in alarm storms, t he local control ler can si mply pol l all the meters to di scover which are alarmed. This may take a substantial ti me, typically a few mi nutes, to complete. Although such a length of ti me is normal ly unacceptable for genui ne alarm situations of the emergency type, it is l i kely to be tolerable for alarm storms because there wi l l probabl y be i nsufficient resources to take satisfactory action to respond to al l the alarms even when they have all been detected and identified properly. Also, there is li kely to be a common cause for all (or nearl y all) the alarms, and that can be identified from a single alarmed meter (if it can be identified from the meters at all). Mains system monitoring The present alarm monitori ng system can be adapted to monitor the general transmission characteristics of the mains distribution system as a background task. For this, a meter is chosen by the local controller and i nstructed to step through a full sequence of alarm frequencies; the sequence may be at a lower amplitude than for normal alarm si gnals, and may be repeated for successively lower amplitudes. The frequency analyser 43 detects these frequencies. By taki ng suitable meters i n turn, the transmission characteristics of the mains system can be determined from the recei ved amplitudes of the various detected frequencies. If a parti cular frequency has a paticularly poor transmission characteristic from a particular meter, the combination of alarm frequencies assi gned to that meter can then be chosen or modifi ed to avoid that frequency.

Claims: C lai i 1 A remote metering system comprisi ng a mains su pply system ( 10- 1 4) having a local controller (LC) and a plurality of consumer meter units (U l -U l l ) with which the local controller communicates by sendi ng messages for return by the addres¬ sed meters, each message consisting of a series of bits encoded in a frequency band above the mains frequency and messages to distant meters bei ng relayed v ia intermediate meters, characterized in that the local controller incl udes means for monitoring the mains for a set of alarm frequencies and each meter includes means for generating a respecti ve combination of those frequencies. 2 A remote messaging system accordi ng to clai m 1 , characterized in that the alarm frequencies are generated sequentially. 3 A remote messaging system according to either previous claim, characterized in that the alarm f requencies are i nside the frequency band used for normal messaging. 4 A remote messaging system according to any previous claim, characterized in that the combinations of alarm frequencies used by the meters each consist of 3 distinct frequencies. 5 A remote messaging system according to any previous claim, characterized in that the local controller includes means for decoding thfc combination of alarm frequencies to identify the meter ori ginati ng the alarm and, if the meter is not uniquely identified, means for polling those meters which have the detected frequency or frequencies to discover which of them has an alarm condition. 6 A remote messaging system according to any previous claim, characterized in that the combinations of of frequencies assigned to the meters are assigned according to an error detecting or correcting code, chosen to enable missing frequencies to be detected and/or corrected. 7 A remote messagi ng system accordi ng to any previous claim, characterized in that the meters are microprocessoi — ased, with the normal message signals and the alarm frequencies being synthesized from a sequence of digital values by a digital-to-analog converter. 8 A remote messaging system according to any previous claim, characterized in that when the local controller detects frequencies in the set of alarm frequencies, it interrupts normal messaging and responds to the alarm condition by sending a message to the alarmed meter. 9 A remote messaging system according to any previous claim, characterized in that the local controller can instruct a meter to step through the full range of alarm frequencies and will then monitor the strength of the received alarm signals. 10 A remote metering system including alarm means substantially as herein described with reference to the drawings. 1 1 Any novel and i nventive feature or combination of features specifically disclosed herein within the meaning of Article 4H of the International Convention (Paris Convention).

Inventors: ALLISON ROBERT JOSEPH, MOORE PAUL MARTIN, SCHOLEFIELD DAVID ROGER, ALLISON, ROBERT, JOSEPH, MOORE, PAUL, MARTIN, SCHOLEFIELD, DAVID, ROGER
Applicants: ALLISON ROBERT JOSEPH, MOORE PAUL MARTIN, REMOTE METERING SYSTEMS LTD, SCHOLEFIELD DAVID ROGER, ALLISON, ROBERT, JOSEPH, MOORE, PAUL, MARTIN, REMOTE METERING SYSTEMS LTD., SCHOLEFIELD, DAVID, ROGER
Application year: 1995
Main classification: H02J13
IPC codes: H02J13, H04B3, H04Q9