METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE LYSINE CONTENT OF SEEDS

Abstract: Seed lysine is detected by an immunoassay in which anti-EF antibody binds seed protein. Seed EF concentration is highly correlated with seed lysine content.

Description: METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE LYSINE CONTENT OF SEEDS Background of the Invention The present invention relates generally to means for the genetic selection of plants and specifically to methods for determining seed lysine content. Lysine is an essential amino acid in the diets of humans and many economically important animals. But grains such as maize, millet and sorghum contain low concentrations of lysine. As a result, diets comprised of these grains need to be supplemented with extra, usually more expensive sources of lysine. A major aim of agricultural research has been to improve the nutritional quality of these grains, in particular maize, as summarized by Mertz et al . , Science 145: 279 (1964), and Nelson, Adv. Cer. Sci . Tech. 3: 41 (1980) . Maize protein contains 1.5% lysine but the human diet optimally requires 5% of protein to be lysine. Therefore, much research concerns the problem of increasing lysine concentration in maize seeds. Research on improved maize varieties is generally applicable to other grains such as sorghum and millet that have similar endosperm properties and endosperm proteins, as described by Shull et al . , Protoplasma 171: 64 (1992). The discovery by Mertz et al., supra, of the high lysine maize opaque2 strain which contains 3% lysine in its protein, stimulated many studies that genetically selected seeds based on their lysine contents. The opaque2 strain lysine concentration was shown to be higher than that of the wild strain because opaque2 seeds contain a lower concentration of the lysine-deficient zein protein fraction and a higher concentration of the lysine-containing non-zein protein fraction from the seed endosperm. Because the opaque2 endosperm is unusually soft and starchy, this so-called "high lysine" maize has not been widely utilized. Continuing development of new strains using "opaque2" modifier genes continues through seed selection based on seed lysine measurements. See "Discovery of high lysine, high tryptophan cereals", in QUALITY PROTEIN MAIZE, Mertz (ed.), pages 1-8, (Am. Assoc. Cereal Chemists, 1992) . The important seed lysine measurement step used in the development of varieties such as the opaque2 strain, however, is slow, expensive and destructive to seed samples. This is because the measurement procedure requires a tedious hydrolysis step followed by amino acid analysis or an indirect measurement via a dye binding assay. See Mertz et al., Science 145: 279 (1964), and Cereal Chem. 51: 304 (1974), respectively. The lysine measurement procedure also typically requires multiple seeds to generate a sufficient amount of tissue for analysis. This hinders genetic crossing experiments by requiring multiple progeny solely for the lysine determination procedure. These problems slow down and increase the cost of developing improved higher lysine seeds. In addition to the measurement of lysine from protein fractions, individual seed proteins and their lysine contents are sometimes measured in different strains of seeds. Damerval, Heredity 10: 38 (1993) , showed that the higher lysine content of the opaque2 maize strain results from increased amounts of at least six unidentified non- zein polypeptides in the maize endosperm. Similarly, Habben et al . , Plant Molec . Biol . 23: 825 (1993), cloned cDNA that codes for lysine-containing proteins and found higher amounts of elongation factor lα ("EP-lo.") , trypsin inhibitor, catalase 2, RSP 113 and RSP 40 mRNAs in the opaque2 maize strain compared to the wild type strain and relatively unchanged amounts of MRNAS that code for other lysine-containing protein such as sucrose synthase. Of this group, EF-lα protein was found to contain 11% lysine. Aguilar et al . , Plant Molec. Biol . 17: 351 (1991) . SDS-PAGE analysis of other seed endosperm proteins revealed higher amounts of ADPG pyrophosphorylase protein in the high lysine opaque2 strain compared to the wild type. Habben et al . , supra, at pages 831 and 833. Specific seed proteins are sometimes quantified by immunological methods. For example, see Paiva et al . , Cereal Chemistry 68: 276 (1991) . There is no suggestion or evidence, however, that individual seed proteins or their mRNAS can be assayed by the techniques summarized above to determine relative seed lysine concentration. Thus, the need remains for a simple and fast method to estimate seed lysine content. Summary of the Invention Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method for estimating seed lysine content. Another objective of the invention is to provide a method for the fast and efficient comparison of different seed varieties. These and other objects are made possible by a simple immunological method for estimating seed lysine content based on the binding of anti-EF complex antibody with seed protein. The method is useful for the genetic selection of new maize, sorghum, millet, wheat, barley, rye, soybean, sunflower, canola and rice varieties and unlike previous methods, only requires one seed per measurement. The method is not limited to the use of intact antibody that binds EF complex for the immunoassay binding step, but can utilize reagents comprised of antibody fragments. Finally, diagnostic test kits are provided in various formats to detect seed lysine. Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 depicts a regression relationship between EF-lα ELISA measurement and lysine measurements from various maize genotypes. Figure 2 depicts a regression relationship between Sucrose Synthase measurement and lysine measurements from various maize genotypes. Figure 3 depicts a regression relationship between ADPGase measurement and lysine measurements from various maize genotypes. Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments A significant correlation has been discovered between the immunological measurement of seed EF-lα and seed lysine content. Accordingly, the invention provides for the detection of seed lysine for example, in the context of a breeding program to improve lysine content by the simple measurement of seed EF complex. In this regard, the phrase "EF complex" denotes a component of the cell's protein synthetic machinery which is involved with polypeptide elongation. An EF complex comprises EF-lα, EF-l/3γ and EF-2 protein. See Lauer et al . , J. Biol. Chew. 268: 1644 (1984), which is incorporated in its entirety by reference. The finding of a high correlation between EF-lα and lysine in seeds is surprising because measurements of two other lysine-containing proteins in seeds, sucrose synthase and ADPG pyrophosphorylase, are not correlated with seed lysine content. As a result of this finding, lysine content for various seed varieties for the first time can be compared by immunoassay methods. These methods are inherently faster and easier than the procedures heretofore used to measure seed lysine. More specifically, the present invention allows the measurement of EF complex in an aqueous seed extract obtained from as little as one seed. An EF complex immunoassay according to the present invention is performed by bringing together antibody or antibody binding fragment that recognizes EF complex or a component thereof with seed protein in an immunoassay format to generate a signal in response to the binding of antibody to protein. This signal response reflects the presence of seed lysine. Seed preparation procedures that solubilize non-zein protein can be used to prepare seed extracts for lysine detection. The preferred method is to grind frozen or dried seeds to a fine powder with a mortar and pestle or mill and to dissolve the proteins in an alkaline buffer that contains sodium dodecyl sulfate and 2- mercaptoethanol as taught by Wallace et al. , supra . The solubilized protein is used directly in an immunoassay with dilution in a suitable buffer or alternatively after storage in a solubilized form, frozen form, or precipitated form. Seed extract is combined with antibody and marker substance in an immunoassay method of the present invention. In this context, the term "antibody" encompasses monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. Such an antibody can belong to any antibody class (IgG, IgM, IgA, etc.). For monoclonal antibody (Mab) production, one generally proceeds by isolating lymphocytes and fusing them with myeloma cells, producing hybridomas. The cloned hybridomas are then screened for production of antibodies that bind to EF-lα. "Antibody" also encompasses fragments, like Fv, Fab, Fab', F(ab) 2 and F(ab') 2 , of anti-EF-lα antibodies, and conjugates of such fragments, and so-called "antigen binding proteins" (single-chain antibodies) which are based on anti-EF-lα antibodies, in accordance, for example, with U.S. patent No. 4,704,692, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Alternatively, Mabs or a fragment thereof within the present invention can be produced using conventional procedures via the expression of isolated DNA which codes for variable regions of such an Mab in host cells like E. coli , see, for example, Ward, et al . , Nature 341: 544 (1989), or transfected murine myeloma cells. See Gillies, et al . , Biotechnol . 7: 799 (1989) and Nakatani, et al . , Biotechnol . 7: 805 (1989) . EF-lα is an abundant protein and has been studied in several species of plants. See Carvalho, et al . , Arch . Biochem. Biophys . 234: 591 (1984) and Aguilar, et al . , Plant Molec . Biol . 17: 351 (1991) . In this description, protein bound by an antibody in accordance with the present invention is denoted "EF-lα, " a term used here to encompass any protein having sufficient amino acid sequence similarity with EF-lα to react with antibody raised against EF-lα per se . Included under the EF-lα rubric, for example, is a "vitronectin-like protein," described by Zhu et al . , The Plant Cell 6: 393 (1994), that has greater than 93% amino acid sequence identity with EF-lα and that is bound by anti-EF-lα antibody. In the present description, the phrase "marker substance" denotes any molecule that can be conjugated to an antibody and that makes a detectable signal in an immunoassay method. A marker substance can be a catalyst and can be a noncatalytic molecule. An enzyme such as B- galactosidase, alkaline phosphatase or horseradish peroxidase is preferred as a catalyst marker substance, although a non-catalytic marker such as a fluorogenic or chemilumigenic moiety is also suitable. Immunoassay methods are well known by those of ordinary skill in the art. The basic approach underlying any immunoassay can be adapted for application pursuant to the present invention. The basis of the immunoassay method as used in the present invention is the binding of anti-EF-lα antibody to seed extract. Any assay format that employs such binding is suitable for implementing the invention. Heterogeneous format immunoassays are particularly suitable. A preferred format is to immobilize extracted endosperm proteins to a surface. This is followed by contact of the surface with anti-EF-lα antibody conjugated to marker substance to allow binding of the conjugate to protein on the surface. After removal of unbound protein, preferably by washing the surface with buffered solution of detergent, a signal is produced by the marker substance in proportion to the amount of antibody bound to the surface. Alternatively, the marker substance, conjugated to a second antibody can be added for a second binding reaction. Homogeneous format immunoassays in which all reactions occur in solution are also suitable. Many homogeneous immunoassay formats such as enzyme modulated immunoassay (EMIT) , fluorescence polarization immunoassay and substrate linked immunofluorescence immunoassay are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. An immunoassay signal result is expressed in any convenient form, such as relative signal response, signal response per unit protein, signal response per unit weight, signal response per seed, etc. For comparing seeds of different strains or species it is preferred to express the immunoassay signal response per unit seed weight. The present invention, thus generally described, will be understood more readily by reference to the following example, which is provided by way of illustration and is not intended to limit the present invention. The example illustrates the high correlation between a measurement of protein that is bound by anti-EF-lα antibody and lysine- content measurements performed by conventional amino acid analysis for seeds from a diverse set of maize strains. In contrast, similar measurements of other lysine- containing seed proteins do not correlate with seed lysine measurements. Endosperm flour from North American normal and opaque2 inbred seeds of W64A, B73, Mol7, and the open- pollinated populations Tuxpeno, Tuxpeno opaque2 and Tuxpeno modified opaque2 from Central America were sampled. Total protein, zein and non-zein fractions were obtained by the method of Wallace et al. , supra, and measured by micro-Kjeldahl analysis. AACC: Approved methods of the AACC. Method 46-13. Amer. Assoc. Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN (1976) . Flour samples were extracted for one hour on a shaker at room temperature with 0.0125 M sodium borate, pH 10, 1% SDS, 2% 2- mercaptoethanol, at a ratio of 1:10 (flour/solvent) . The suspensions were centrifuged at 5000 x g for 20 minutes and the supernatants saved. This extraction was repeated twice and the supernatants were pooled. For total protein analyses, the seed extracts were dried and directly used. For the zein/non-zein determinations, ethanol was added to the total protein extracts to a final concentration of 70%. The mixtures were allowed to stand for two hours with occasional stirring and then centrifuged. The supernatants contained the zein fractions and the pellets contained the non-zein fractions. Total protein, zein, non-zein and residual proteins were analyzed for nitrogen by the micro-Kjeldahl method. Nitrogen values were multiplied by 6.25 to calculate protein amounts. Preliminary testing showed that the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate did not interfere with nitrogen determination. Amino acid analyses were obtained by the procedures of sample hydrolysis, performic acid oxidation followed by acid hydrolysis for cysteine, and alkaline hydrolysis for tryptophan. AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Method 15:982.30 E(a,b,c) . The Association: Washington, D.C. (1990) . Amino acids were separated and analyzed using a Beckman 6300 Amino Acid Analyzer equipped with a high performance cation exchange column. Amino acids were detected via a post-column reaction with ninhydrin. Norleucine was used as an internal standard. For immunoassay measurements, protein extractions and zein/non-zein fractionations were performed as described by Wallace, et al . , supra . Non-zein pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of 0.1 N NaOH, 1% SDS and diluted 1000 fold with carbonate coating buffer (Clark et al., in METHODS IN ENZYMOLOGY, Weissbach et al. (eds.) pages 742- 766 (Academic Press, 1993) . Samples were then serially diluted into wells of an ELISA plate (Immulon2, Immulon4, Dynatech) and incubated overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, excess antigen was removed, the wells were washed with TTBS (25mM Tris-Hcl, pH 7.5, 0.9% NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20) and an antibody specific to EF-lα (Zhu et al . , Plant Cell 6: 393 (1994)), sucrose synthase or ADPGase was diluted 1:1000 in TTBS and added to the wells. Sample ELISA plates were incubated for two hours at room temperature. The antibody solutions were removed, ELISA plate wells were washed twice with TTBS and a second antibody conjugated to marker substance, (alkaline- phosphatase-conjugated rabbit anti-chicken; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, Pa) was diluted 1:4000 in TTBS, and added to the wells. The second binding reaction continued for two hours. The antibody- marker substance solutions were removed and the ELISA plate wells were washed twice with TTBS. Two hundred microliters of alkaline phosphatase substrate reagent (Sigma, St. Louis) made by dilution into diethanolamine substrate buffer (Clark, et al supra) were added to each well. Color from the enzymatic reaction developed for one hour and the absorbances of the ELISA plate wells were measured on a Dynatech MR700 ELISA plate reader adjusted to 410 nm. The ranges of protein concentrations chosen for the ELISA assays were such that the relationship of absorbance versus relative antigen concentration for each assay was approximately linear as determined by regression analysis. Figure 1 shows that measurements obtained by ELISA with the anti-EF-lα antibody highly correlated (r = 0.95) with seed lysine contents. Figure 2 shows that measurements of seed sucrose synthase contents by ELISA did not highly correlate (r - 0.75) with seed lysine contents. Figure 3 shows that measurements of seed ADPGase contents by ELISA did not highly correlate (r = 0.46) with seed lysine contents. Although the foregoing refers to a particular preferred embodiment, it will be understood that the present invention is not so limited. It will occur to those of ordinary skill in the art that various modifications may be made to the disclosed embodiments and that such modifications are intended to be within the scope of the present invention, which is defined by the following claims.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. An immunological method for estimating seed lysine content, comprising the steps of (a) contacting seed extract with antibody that recognizes EF complex and then (b) determining whether binding occurs between said antibody and said seed extract. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said seed extract comprises endosperm protein. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said seed extract is selected from the group consisting of maize seed extract, sorghum seed extract, millet seed extract, wheat seed extract, barley seed extract, rye seed extract, soybean seed extract, canola seed extract, sunflower seed extract and rice seed extract. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said antibody recognizes a protein selected from the group consisting of EF-lα, EF-10γ and EF-2. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein said antibody is a monoclonal antibody or a binding fragment thereof . 6. The method of claim 5, wherein said binding fragment is selected from the group consisting of Fv, single-chain antibody, Fab, Fab', F(ab) 2 and F(ab') 2 . 7. A kit for use in determining seed lysine content, comprising: (a) a surface that binds seed extract; (b) a first receptacle containing an antibody that binds EF complex; (c) a second receptacle containing a conjugate of a second antibody and a marker substance, wherein said second antibody binds said first antibody; and (d) an agent for removing unbound protein. 8. A kit according to claim 7, wherein said antibody that binds EF complex recognizes a protein selected from the group consisting of EF-lα, EF-l/3γ and EF-2. 9. A kit according to claim 7, wherein said surface is coated with antibody that binds EF complex. 10. A kit according to claim 9, wherein said antibody binds a protein selected from the group consisting of EF-lα, EF-10γ and EF-2. 11. A kit for determining seed lysine content, comprising: (a) a surface that binds seed extract; (b) a receptacle containing antibody-marker substance conjugate wherein the antibody binds specifically to EF complex; and (c) an agent for removing unbound protein. 12. A kit according to claim 11, wherein said antibody recognizes a protein selected from the group consisting of EF-lα, EF-l/3γ and EF-2. 13. A kit according to claim 11, wherein said surface is coated with antibody that binds EF complex. 14. A kit according to claim 13, wherein said antibody binds a protein selected from the group consisting of EF-lα, EF-l3γ and EF-2.

Inventors: HABBEN JEFFREY E, LARKINS BRIAN A, MORO GLOVERSON, HABBEN, JEFFREY, E., LARKINS, BRIAN, A., MORO, GLOVERSON
Applicants: UNIV ARIZONA, ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS
Application year: 1995
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: C07K16, G01N33