WHEEL SUSPENSION SYSTEM

Abstract: The present invention relates to a wheel suspension system for a vehicle or equivalent, said wheel suspension system comprising a wheel hub, respectively traction motor (2), mounted on axle beam (5), whereto the wheel (1) has been attached. The wheel hub, respectively traction motor (2), has been mounted on the axle beam (5) articulatedly, mainly by mediation of a longitudinal suspension pin (3) of a vehicle or equivalent, said suspension pin (3) being located essentially in the centreline of the wheel (1), in height direction at a space (1) below the central axis (A) of the wheel (1). The wheel (1) is in such case enabled, while adapting itself to the running base, to tilt freely around the suspension pin (3) irrespective of the tilting of the vehicle or equivalent and/or the axle beam (5).

Description: Wheel suspension system The present invention relates to a wheel suspension system for a vehicle or equival¬ ent, said wheel suspension system comprising a wheel hub mounted on an axle beam, respectively, on a traction motor, on which the wheel has been mounted. In prior art structures, the wheel has been rigidly bearably carried to a part in the axial system so that the geometrical structure thereof has also defined the lateral tilting of the wheel. In addition, the overall tilting of the vehicle has affected also the tilting of the wheel. The object of the present invention is to disclose a novel wheel suspension system with which the drawbacks of the prior art structures are avoided in driving in varying terrain circumstances. In order to achieve the aims set for the invention, the invention is mainly characterized in that the wheel hub, respectively traction motor, has been mounted on the axle beam articulatedly, mainly by means of a longitudinal suspension pin of the vehicle or equivalent, said suspension pin being positioned substantially in the centreline of the wheel, in height direction at a space below the central axis of the wheel so that the wheel is enabled to tilt freely, adapting itself to the running ground, around the suspension pin irrespective of the tilting of the vehicle or equivalent, and/or of the axle beam. The most significant advantage of the design of the invention lies therein that therewith the lateral tilting of the wheel can be adapted according to the driving ground, and to distribute the surface pressure uniformly. The friction can at the same time be optimally utilized. In order to function optimally, without continuous forced driving, a relatively wide tyre needs to be included in the structure. The invention is described below more in detail, reference being made to the accompanying drawings with which certain structural alternatives of the invention are demonstrated. Fig. 1 presents in front view and partly sectioned an advantageous embodiment of the wheel suspension system of the invention, applied in an axial system provided with separate springs. Fig. 2 presents partly sectioned the design of Fig. 1, in top view of Fig. 1. Fig. 3 demonstrates the wheel suspension system in lateral view. Fig. 4 presents, as an image shown in Fig. 1, a wheel suspension system in terrain. Fig. 5 and 6 present a second embodiment of the wheel suspension system of the invention. Accordingly, Figs. 1 to 4 of the drawing present the wheel suspension system of the invention applied in an axial system provided with separate springs. In the structure shown in the figures the axial system is comprised of "axle halves", that is, support¬ ing arms 5, swingingly pivotedly attached to a connection piece 8 mounted with a centre pin 6 on the vehicle frame (not shown). In embodiment shown in Figs. 1 to 4, both supporting arms 5 have been articulated on a common central pin 6, though it is clear that the supporting arms 5 can be suspended on the connection piece 8 also separately, with articulation pins of their own. The supporting arms 5 are provided with spring elements 7 for which hydraulic cylinders 7 have been used in the presentation of the figures, said cylinders being most preferredly connected with a hydraulic pipe system to an external hydraulic accumulator (not shown). In the presentation of the figures the structure of the axle system has been connected to the frame structures of the vehicle with a vertical pin 9, around which pin the entire axial system can be pivoted for steering. In a steerable axle system like this the steering mechanism can be coupled e.g. onto said vertical pin 9 or connection piece 8. It is obvious that the wheel suspension system of the invention may also be used in association with a non-steered axle system, though not depicted in the figures of the drawing. In the design of the invention the wheels 1 of the vehicle or equivalent have been suspended to the axle system as follows. The figures present a tracting axial system for which the design of the invention is most appropriate and in which the greatest advantages can be gained therewith. In the axle system, i.e. in the supporting arm 5 shown in the embodiment of the figures a traction motor 2 has been installed for each wheel 1, preferably a hydraulic motor (hydrostatic motor), being articulately attached to the supporting arm 5 of the axle system by mediation of a pin 3. Thus, the traction motor 2 is allowed to turn freely relative to the supporting arm 5 around the pin 3. The axle of the traction motor 2 is provided with a flange 2a, whereon the wheel 1 has been fixed. Consequently, the axle of the traction motor 2 is joined with the central axis of wheel 1 depicted with reference A in Fig. 1. As is demonstrated in Fig. 1, the pin 3 by means of which the traction motor 2 has been attached to the supporting arm 5 is located substantially below the central axis A of the wheel in height direction, whereby said height-direction distance between the pin 3 and the central axis A of wheel 1 is indicated by reference 1. As can be also seen in the figures, the direction of the pin 3 is mainly the running direction of the axial system. Each wheel 1 is thus enabled to tilt around the pin 3 so that the wheel 1 is enabled to accomodate itself according to unevennesses of the terrain or equivalent running base. It is moreover shown in Figs. 1—4 that the suspension arrangement is provided with a damping means 4 with which the tilting of the wheel 1 can be damped if con¬ sidered necessary. In the presentation of the figures a hydraulic cylinder 4 can be used as a damping means with which cylinder the tilting of the wheel 1 can be effectively controlled and with which the wheel 1 can, if needed, be locked in place so that its tilting around the pin 3 has been prevented. The wheel suspension system has moreover been provided with tilt limiters (not shown) wherewith the tilting angle of the wheels 1 has been confined to a desired value so that the wheel 1 is not permitted, not even in adverse terrain circumstances, to "fall under". The structure is examined below more in detail as well as the effect of the dimen- sions of the structure on the properties. The tyre profile, selected according to the need (ratio of the outer tyre diameter and the centre hole or the ratio of the tyre width and the outer tyre diameter), affects the height position of the pin 3 from the running ground on the centreline of the tyre. The stability of the wheel is enhanced the lower the suspension pin 3 is placed, that is, the greater is the ratio of the distance 1 between the pin 3 and the central axis A of the wheel 1 with the distance of the central axis A of the wheel from the running ground, that is with the radius of the wheel. Fig. 3 demonstrates the so-called caster angle concept with which the behaviour of the wheel in the terrain can decisively be affected. In Fig. 3, the value of the caster angle C is positive, so that the axle beam 5 (supporting arm 5) has been rotated slightly around the central axis A of the wheel 1 against the direction of rotation R, whereby the suspension pin 3 has moved therewith. In fact, the entire axle beam 5 need not be rotated in the manner shown in Fig. 3; instead, the suspension pin 3 can be arranged at an angle correspondingly in the axle beam 5. The positive caster angle C will stabilize the vehicle at higher speeds. In addition, while tilting because of an obstruction, the wheel tries to mount on top of the obstruction, thus reducing the lateral forces directed at the body of the vehicle. On a soft running ground the wheel tends to mount on a more holding side as regards the point of contact of the tyre. At a negative caster angle the effect is reverse. In a multiaxial vehicle, different settings on different axles can be used to comply with load and behavioural requirements. By means of the magnitude of the caster angle the level of autocontrolling is affected. As is disclosed above, the wheel suspension in the presentations of the figures has been provided with a tilt damping means, particularly with a damping cylinder 4. For the damping cylinder 4, single or double-acting hydraulic cylinder can be used as need be. Thereby, by preventing all fluid flows in the hydraulic cylinder 4 the wheel 1 is locked in desired position, and by restricting fluid flows, an appropriate damping is sought. When a double-acting cylinder 4 is used, the wheel 1 may also be force-straightened since with the structure shown in the figures the piston is furthermost within the cylinder 4 when the wheel 1 is in vertical position. Force- straightening can be needed e.g. on a highly soft driving ground or when driving on a slope. For the spring element 7, either single- or double-acting hydraulic cylinder can be used whenever needed. The cylinder 7 has preferredly connected with a hose or pipe either to a spring-action or gas-action pressure accumulator. In a system implemented with fluid-mediated action, the rigidity of the springs and the tilting differences of the terrain can be compensated steplessly by increasing or decreasing the fluid quantity in various spring elements. A vehicle, such as forest tractor, provided with the structure depicted in the figure and with motion angles there indicated, is enabled to drive at about 20° tilting on a base without any deviation of the body structure from the horizontal level in lateral direction. Efforts are made to demonstrate particularly this aspect in Fig. 4. In Figs. 5 and 6, an alternative embodiment to the structure described above is presented. The wheel suspension system shown in said figures deviates from what is described in the foregoing in that the traction motor 2 has not been suspended directly on the axle beam 5; instead, in the present embodiment an intermediate support 3A has been articulately mounted on the axle beam 5 with the aid of a suspension pin 3, and on said intermediate support 3 A, the traction motor 2 has been suspended by mediation of a second suspension pin 3' . In Fig. 5, the height-direction distance between the suspension pins 3 and 3' is indicated by reference 1 } ; respect¬ ively, the height-direction distance between the second suspension pin 3' and the centre axis A of wheel 1 is indicated by reference 1 2 , whereby the total distance in height direction from the central axis A of wheel 1 to the suspension point in the axle beam 5 (suspension pin 3) is l j + 1 2 . In the presentation of Fig. 6, the suspen¬ sion pins 3,3' are presented in parallel, but they may also be arranged at a small angle relative to one another, whereby with said design a similar effect can be achieved as described in conjunction with Fig. 3 (caster angle). Using the design shown in Figs. 5 and 6, the positioning of the wheel 1 to the terrain is even freer than with the design of Figs. 1—4. The principle of freely swinging wheel of the invention can be applied to nearly all springing and axle structures known in the art, also in steering, in a separately rotating wheel e.g. in so-called Mac Pherson structure. It is furthermore possible that in a vehicle provided with the wheel-suspension system of the invention, e.g. in a forest tractor, a crawler track is led around the wheels in succession in order to improve the terrain properties of the vehicle. Hereby, the design may have been so implemented that the wheels in succession are tilted likewise and to an equal extent, whereby the crawler track inclines together with the wheels as one unit. On the other hand, the design may have been so implemented that the consecutive wheels are allowed to incline individually, whereby the crawler track is required to be such in structure that it is enabled to twist in order to accomodate to variations of inclina¬ tions in the driving base. The wheel suspension system of the invention may also be applied, deviating from what is presented in the figures, in a vehicle provided with mechanical power transmission. The mechanical power transmission can thus be implemented by positioning a universal joint in the centre point of the wheel (on the central axis of the wheel and in the vertical central level of the wheel) and by providing the drive shaft with a sensitively bearably carried telescopic structure, allowing changes in drive shaft length. Furthermore, the wheel suspension arrangement may also be applied in non-traction, that is, freely rotating wheels, whereby, applying for instance the design of Fig. 1, only the wheel hub is arranged in place of the traction motor 2 whereon the wheel 1 has been bearably carried. Various embodiments of the invention may be varied within the scope of the inventive idea defined in the accompanying claims below.

Claims: Claims 1. A wheel suspension system for a vehicle or equivalent, said wheel suspension system comprising a wheel hub, respectively a traction motor (2) mounted on an axle beam (5), whereto the wheel (1) has been attached, characterized in that the wheel hub, respectively traction motor (2), has been mounted on the axle beam (5) articulatedly, mainly by mediation of a longitudinal suspension pin (3) of a vehicle or equivalent, said suspension pin (3) being located substantially in the centreline of the wheel (1), in height direction at a space (1, l j + 1 2 ) below the central axis (A) of the wheel (1) in that the wheel (1) is enabled, by adapting itself to the running ground, to tilt freely around the suspension pin (3) irrespective of the tilting of the vehicle or equivalent, and/ or of the axle beam (5). 2. Wheel suspension system according to claim 1, characterized in that the suspen- sion pin (3) has been installed to be substantially horizontal in direction. 3. Wheel suspension system according to claim 1 , characterized in that the suspen¬ sion pin (3) has been so pivoted in the propagation direction of the vehicle from the horizontal direction against the direction of rotation (R) of the wheel (1) that the wheel has a positive caster angle (C). 4. Wheel suspension system according to any one of the preceding claims, charac¬ terized in that the wheel hub, respectively traction motor (2), has been joined by mediation of the suspension pin (3) directly to the axle beam (5). 5. Wheel suspension system according to any one of claims 1—3, characterized in that on the suspension pin (3) mounted on the axle beam (5) an intermediate support (3 A) has been articulatedly attached, whereon the wheel hub, respectively traction motor (2), has been articulatedly attached with the aid of a second suspension pin (3'), this being at least approximately parallel in direction with the suspension pin (3) between the axle beam (5) and the intermediate support (3A). 6. Wheel suspension system according to claim 5, characterized in that the suspen¬ sion pins (3,3') have been mutually arranged to be at a slight angle. 7. Wheel suspension system according to any one of the preceding claims, charac- terized in that the wheel suspension system has been provided with a damping means (4) arranged between the axle beam (5) and the wheel hub, respectively traction motor (2), to reduce the tilting of the wheel (1). 8. Wheel suspension system according to claim 7, characterized in that the damping means (4) is hydraulic, hydropneumatic or pneumatic. 9. Wheel suspension system according to any one of the preceding claims, charac¬ terized in that the traction motor (2) is a hydraulic motor known in itself in the art. 10. Wheel suspension system according to any one of the preceding claims in a vehicle provided with two or more axles in succession, characterized in that a crawler track nning as an endless link has been arranged around at least two successive wheels.

Inventors: PITKAENEN TOIVO JOHANNES, PITKAENEN, TOIVO, JOHANNES
Applicants: PITKAENEN TOIVO JOHANNES, PITKAENEN, TOIVO, JOHANNES
Application year: 1995
Main classification: B60G3
IPC codes: B60G3, B60G7, B60G9, B60G17, B60K7, B60K17, B62D55