CLEANER COMPOSITION

Abstract: This invention relates to a cleaner composition based on hydrocarbon solvents and its use for removal of ink in the printing industry. In particular this invention relates to a cleaner composition composed of: a) one or more aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents; b) from 2-40 %wt of one or more (i) monohydric alcohols and/or (ii) polyhydric alcohols, each having a hydrogen bonding index (HBI) of less than 0 and a relative evaporation rate (RER) of at least 0.005; and c) from 0-30 %wt of one or more glycol ethers or esters, wherein the composition has a flash point of 50-80 DEG C, and contains at most 1 % by weight of aromatic hydrocarbons.

Description: CLEANER COMPOSITION This invention relates to a cleaner composition based on hydrocarbon solvents and its use in the printing industry. In particular, the invention relates to a cleaner composition suitably applied in the removal of ink, pigments and impurity residues from metal and rubber components of apparatus used in the main printing processes, viz. letterpress, lithography, gravure, flexography and screen printing (cf. chapter 2 of "The Printing Ink Manual", 4th ed. by R.H. Leach, (1988) ISBN 0-7476-0000-7). More in particular, the invention relates to a cleaner composition which can be applied in the removal of ink, more specifically off-set printing ink, and undesirable residues from cylinders and rubber coatings encountered in offset lithographic processes. Industrial solvents are used in a wide variety of applications, amongst others in cleaner compositions. They may be classified in two categories, i.e., hydrocarbon solvents which contain carbon and hydrogen, and chemical solvents which contain other atoms besides carbon and hydrogen such as chlorine, oxygen, nitrogen, etc. Hydrocarbon solvents may in turn be divided into the subclasses of aromatics and aliphatics. Industry, amongst them the printing industry, has previously used cleaner compositions based on chemical solvents, in particular halogenated hydrocarbons, and/or cleaner compositions containing aromatic hydrocarbons. It will be appreciated that recent legisla¬ tion and environmental concerns have made it necessary to replace these cleaner compositions with reformulated non-aromatic, halogen- free cleaner compositions. Moreover, such reformulated non-aromatic, halogen-free cleaner composition should: readily remove the aforementioned contaminants (superior dissolving power for ink and undesirable residues) without unfavourable effects on the parts of the printing machine (e.g., no rubber-swell); readily vaporise (Relative Evaporation Rate, according to ASTM D 3539 of at least 0.01 relative to n-butylacetate) without introducing fire hazards (having a flash point in excess of 40 β C, preferably in excess of 55 °C, to satisfy storage and transport classification A III); have low toxicity, such that labelling neither as a toxic substance, nor as a skin- or eye irritant, nor as a harmful substance is required (respectively "T", "X^" or "X n " labels according to EC Directive 67-548); and - be a single phase, detergent-free composition, so as to allow the removal of contaminants and the use of the machinery thus decontaminated in one single step without leaving residual material. It will be realised that several of the requirements mentioned above are difficult to attain together. Therefore, in the art of cleaner compositions, in particular in the art applicable to the printing industry, some sacrifices have been made. From US patent specification 5,104,567 environmentally acceptable and biodegradable cleaner compositions are known. However, such cleaner compositions contain an emulsifier that needs to be removed in a subsequent step. Likewise commercial cleaners are known (e.g., Tryk A (tm) , a vegetable cleaner based on coconut and soya bean oil exemplified hereinafter) that, although free of detergent, evaporates too slowly, thereby also requiring a subsequent washing step. On the other hand, from Japanese patent applications 57,202,399 and 61,293,274 non-detergent cleaner compositions are known that combine good solvent power with low odour and toxicity. However, these compositions are based on a kerosene fraction, i.e., the straight run distillate fraction boiling from 150 to 300 °C and containing besides paraffins and olefins also substantial amounts of aromatic hydrocarbons (depending on the grade crude oil, e.g., about 20% for Arabian Crude) . Further, these kerosene fractions have too low flash point, which makes them dangerous. The aim has been to provide a cleaner composition that satisfies the requirements, i.a. in that no halogen containing compound needs to be present. Accordingly a cleaner composition is provided comprising:- a) one or more aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents; b) from 2-40 %wt of one or more (i) monohydric alcohols and/or (ii) polyhydric alcohols, each having a hydrogen bonding index (HBI) of less than 0 and a relative evaporation rate (RER) of at least 0.005; and c) from 0-30 %wt of one or more glycol ethers and/or esters, wherein the composition has a flash point of 50-80 β C and contains at most 1% by weight of aromatic hydrocarbons. As used throughout the application, the singular aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent, monohydric alcohol, polyhydric alcohol, glycol ether and ester refers to the singular or plural one or more of such compounds unless otherwise indicated. In view of the safety regulations, the flash point of the composition is to be at least 50 β C, preferably at least 55 °C. Preferably, the flash point is of from 55-75 °C. A preferred aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent has a boiling range of 150 to 270 °C at 1 bara, and contains at most 0.5% by weight of aromatic hydrocarbons (amount of aromatic hydrocarbons on total amount of hydrocarbons) . More preferably, such aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent has a boiling range of 175 to 250 °C at 1 bara, and contains at most 0.1% of aromatic hydrocarbons, if any at all. The aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent is therefore essentially composed of paraffins, isoparaffins and naphthenes. For reason of greater solvency power, preferably, the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent is rich in naphthenes, for instance at least 34% by weight, more preferably at least 45% by weight. The aliphatic hydrocarbon is preferably selected from "SHELLSOL TD" (typical initial boiling point, dry point and flash point of 172 °C, 190 °C, respectively 44 °C, 0.1% by weight aromatics) ; "SHELLSOL T" (187 °C, 215 °C, 58 °C, 0.1 %); "SHELLSOL TK" (180 °C, 199 °C, 59 °C, 0.0015%); and more preferably from "SHELLSOL D40" (162 °C, 197 °C, 40 °C, 0.02%); "SHELLSOL D60" (187 °C, 211 °C, 66 °C, 0.02%); and "SHELLSOL D70" (195 °C, 245 °C, 73 °C, 0.03%). ("SHELLSOL" is a Shell trademark) . Naturally, also corresponding, competitive grades may be used. The most preferred aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents are "SHELLSOL D60", "SHELLSOL D60S" (a narrow- cut material, higher in naphthene content than "SHELLSOL D60"), "SHELLSOL D40" and blends of these aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents. The HBI is determined in accordance with the method disclosed in J. Paint Techn., 42(550) , 1970, 636-643 by Nelson et al. Mono- or polyhydric alcohols that have a HBI of more than 0 are for instance alcohols that additionally have an ester, acid, aldehyde, ketone, or similar functionality, as well as aromatic alcohols. Such compounds have been found to have a detrimental impact on rubber swell. The glycol ethers used as component c) , can behave as an electron donor or acceptor. In the presence of component b) , their HBI is set at 0. As a result of the flash point requirement, low molecular weight alcohols such as ethanol; n- or isopropanol; n-, sec-, iso- or tertiary butanol are excluded. The RER is determined according to ASTM D 3539 relative to the evaporation rate of n-butyl acetate (nBuAc = 1) . It is noted that some compounds which can be used as component in the cleaner composition of the present invention have an RER of (slightly) less than 0.01 (for instance between 0.005 and 0.01), but have a sufficiently high RER when measured in the composition of the present invention due to the synergistic effect of component a) . Preferably, the monohydric alcohol is an alkanol or alkenol of 6 to 16 carbon atoms. A monohydric alcohol with less than 6 carbon atoms is likely to be too flammable, whereas monohydric alcohols with more than 16 carbon atoms are of insufficient volatility. Very suitable monohydric alcohols are diisobutyl carbinol (DIBC or 2,6- dimethyl-4-heptanol; HBI is -17.0, RER is 0.04, flash point is 74 °C) and methylisobutyl carbinol (MIBC or 4-methyl-2-pentanol; HBI is -18.7, RER is 0.3, flash point is 41 °C) . Preferably, the polyhydric alcohol is a saturated or unsatu- rated glycol or glycerine of 4 to 16 carbon atoms, or an alditol of the general formula HOCH2 (CHOH) n CH2θH wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to 4. A polyhydric alcohol with less than 4 carbon atoms is likely to be too flammable, whereas polyhydric alcohols with more than 16 carbon atoms are of insufficient volatility. Polyhydric hydrocarbons found to be very suitable are saturated glycols of 4 to 10 carbon atoms, preferably 5 to 8 carbon atoms. Most preferred polyhydric alcohol is hexylene glycol (HBI is -20.0, RER is 0.007, flash point is 93 °C) . Some glycols (such as pure hexylene glycol) are irritating to the eyes and skin. Therefore, the concentration of these irritating glycols in the cleaner composition should preferably not exceed 10 %wt. The glycol ether preferably has the following general formula: R-(-0-R'-) n -OH, in which n can be an integer of from 0 to 15. Preferably, the glycol ether is selected from optionally alkyl- ated mono- or polyethers of a saturated or unsaturated glycol or glycerine having 4 to 16 carbon atoms in total. In the general formula this would make that R and R' have 4 to 16 carbon atoms in total. More preferably, the glycol ether is selected from monoalkyl ethers of ethylene glycol, wherein the alkyl group contains 2 to 4 carbon atoms; monoalkyl ethers of 1,2-propylene glycol, wherein the alkyl group contains 1 to 4 carbon atoms; and monoalkylated dimers or trimers of ethylene glycol or 1,2-propylene glycol, wherein the alkyl group contains 1 to 4 carbon atoms alditols. Examples of suitable glycol ethers comprise "Ethyl OXITOL"; "Isopropyl OXITOL"; "Butyl OXITOL"; "Methyl DIOXITOL", "Butyl DIOXITOL"; and "Methyl DIPROXITOL" ("OXITOL", "DIOXITOL", "PROXITOL" and "DIPROXITOL" are Shell trade marks for the alkyl mono- respectively diether of ethylene or 1,2-propylene glycol). Some glycol ethers may be harmful by inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed. Accordingly, the concentration of these harmful glycol ethers in the cleaner composition should preferably not exceed 20 %wt, preferably not exceed 5 %wt. The ester which can be present as (part of) component c) , is an ester of a glycol. Preferably, an ester having 4-18 carbon atoms in total, is used. An ester which can be used is an acetate ester of glycerine. Most preferably, the triacetate ester and/or the diacetate ester of glycerine are used. In one embodiment of the invention, the cleaner composition is composed of the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent and a monohydric alcohol, optionally in the presence of the glycol ether and/or the ester. If no glycol ether and/or ester are present, the monohydric alcohol preferably is an alcohol of 9 to 16 carbon atoms so as to form one single phase. More preferred, the monohydric alcohol is present in the range of 20-40 %wt if no glycol ether is present. For best results, the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent preferably contains at least 34% by weight, more preferably at least 45% by weight of naphthenes. In another embodiment of the invention, the cleaner composition is composed of the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent and a polyhydric alcohol, optionally in the presence of the glycol ether and/or ester. If no glycol ether and/or ester is present, the polyhydric alcohol preferably is a saturated or unsaturated glycol or glycerine of 9 to 16 carbon atoms. More preferred, the polyhydric alcohol is present in the range of 10-40 %wt if no glycol ether is present. For best results, the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent preferably contains at least 34% by weight, more preferably at least 45% by weight of naphthenes. In a preferred embodiment, the cleaner composition consists for at least 90% by weight, preferably for at least 98% and most preferably solely consists of the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent, the monohydric alcohol and/or the polyhydric alcohol, and optionally the glycol ether and/or ester. If no glycol ether and/or ester is present, the monohydric alcohol preferably is an alcohol of 9 to 16 carbon atoms and/or the polyhydric alcohol preferably is a saturated or unsaturated glycol or glycerine of 9 to 16 carbon atoms. A cleaner composition found to be preferred, consists of the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent and 1-10 %wt, preferably 5-10 %wt of hexylene glycol and 1-30 %wt, preferably 5-30 %wt of MIBC and/or DIBC, more preferably DIBC. In the most preferred embodiment, the cleaner composition is composed of "SHELLSOL D60"/hexylene glycol/DIBC or "SHELLSOL D60S"/hexylene glycol/DIBC in a ratio of about 77/9/14 %wt. Further, the present invention relates to the use of such cleaner compositions for removing ink, more specifically for removing printing ink. The invention is illustrated by the following examples. Examples The inks used in the examples are an offset rotation ink from Premier Holland (23.23.00 cyanogen) and an offset printing ink from Sinclair and Valentine: Quickfris Pantone reflex blue (tm) . The first is based on a rosin modified phenolic resin and a hydrocarbon resin; the latter is based on a rosin modified phenol resin and a soya alkyd. In offset printers butylrubber (NBR) is commonly used as material for the blanket sheet on the printing cylinders and the cover of the inkrollers. Accordingly, the influence of the cleaner composition (rubber swell) was tested on the following NBR types: NBR, No. 17925, blankets offset; Shore A hardness 25, Bδttcher NBR, No. 39935, rotation offset; Shore A hardness 35, Bδttcher - NBR, from cylinder Heidelberger offset printer. The method for the determination of rubber swell is based on the measurement of the solvent uptake or "absorption" in a rubber specimen after a fixed immersion time. The volume change is obtained by weighing the specimen in air and water before and after immersion. The method is described in detail below. Rubber swell (adapted ASTM 471-79) A rubber test specimen of 1 x 1.5 crtr (approx. 1.0 g) was immersed in alcohol and dried with filter paper to remove dirt. Next, the specimen was weighed at room temperature in air (Ml) and in distilled water (M2) . Then, the specimen was quickly immersed in alcohol, dried with compressed air and placed in a 30 ml weighing bottle with 25 ml test medium. This bottle was placed in a condi¬ tioned room (23 °C, 50% RH) . After 25 hours immersion, the specimen was removed from the solvent, quickly immersed in alcohol, dried with compressed air, placed in a tared stoppered weighing bottle and weighed (M3) . After weighing in air, the specimen was removed from the bottle and weighed in distilled water at room temperature (M4) to determine the water displacement after immersion. The procedure from removal of the specimen from the test medium to stoppering the weighing bottle and from removal from the weighing bottle to immersion in water was taken no more than 30 seconds. Any air bubbles clinging to the test specimen were removed before weighing in distilled water. Formulas for determining rubber swell: Change in volume (%) = ( (M3 - M4) - (Ml - M2) ) / (Ml - M2) x 100 Change in mass (%) = (M3 - Ml) /Ml x 100 Cleaning performance The testing of the cleaning performance of solvents and solvent blends is based on the dissolution of a film of dried ink. This film was dried for fixed time intervals. The method applied is semi- static, i.e., the amount of external energy applied into the solubility/cleaning process is as low as possible. The cleaning efficiency is rated as follows: 1: no effect cleaning composition 2: soft film of ink 3: very soft film of ink 4: very soft film of ink and minor part of film of ink removed 5: very soft film of ink and large part of film of ink removed 6-9: film of ink totally removed, ranking on residual blue colour. Ink cleaner test First a strip of aluminium foil (10 x 50 cπr) was thoroughly cleaned with successively xylene and MEK and dried. Next, a film of ink was applied with a 100 micron applicator resulting in a dry film with a thickness of about 50 microns. After a fixed drying time (2/6 hours, 1/3/7 days) at 23 °C and 50 %RH, a small strip (approximately 0.75 x 2 cm*- * ) of coated aluminium foil was cut from the centre of the film and put in a 7 ml vial containing approximately 3 ml of cleaner composition. After 1 day rollerbank, the aluminium foil was removed from the solvent and carefully dried by dabbing with a tissue. The cleaning efficiency of the cleaner composition was obtained by evaluation of the appearance of the treated aluminium foil. The appearance of the solvent was evaluated after 1 day of sedimentation. Results A range of cleaner compositions have been tested, the results of which have been summarised in the table. As comparative examples are included pure "SHELLSOL D60" (Cl) ; Low Aromatic White Spirit (LAWS, containing 17% by weight of aromatics; C2); "TRYK A" (ex Unichema, based on soya been and coconut oil; C3) ; and "SHEET CLEANER" (ex Smeets, based on aromatic hydrocarbon solvents and volatile alcohols; C4) . The cleaner compositions in accordance with the invention are illustrated by the preferred blends of "SHELLSOL D60"/hexylene glycol/DIBC and "SHELLSOL D60S"/hexylene glycol/DIBC, both in the ratio of 77/9/14 %wt (respectively Exl and Ex2) . As can be seen from the table, the best cleaning efficiency is obtained with the currently used "SHEET CLEANER", however closely followed by the cleaner compositions in accordance with the inven¬ tion. Then again, the rubber swell for "SHEET CLEANER" is also the highest (albeit still tolerable) . "SHEET CLEANER" and LAWS are unattractive as their aromatic content is high. Moreover LAWS has a flash point of 39 °C and "SHEET CLEANER" has a flash point of 12 °C. This makes them more dangerous than the compositions of the present invention. "TRYK A", having a flash point of 171 °C, does not evaporate and therefore requires a second wash. Moreover, its high viscosity makes it less attractive. Table

Claims: C A I M S 1. A cleaner composition comprising:- a) one or more aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents; b) from 2-40 %wt of one or more (i) monohydric alcohols and/or (ii) polyhydric alcohols, each having a hydrogen bonding index (HBI) of less than 0 and a relative evaporation rate (RER) of at least 0.005; and c) from 0-30 %wt of one or more glycol ethers and/or esters, wherein the composition has a flash point of 50-80 β C, and contains at most 1% by weight of aromatic hydrocarbons. 2. A cleaner composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent has a boiling range of 175 to 250 °C, and contains at most 0.1% by weight of aromatic hydrocarbons. 3. A cleaner composition as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein component b) (i) is selected from monohydric alcohols having 6 to 16 carbon atoms. 4. A cleaner composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein component b) (ii) is selected from glycols or glycerines of 4 to 16 carbon atoms, or alditols of the general formula HOCH2(CHOH) n CH2θH, wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to 4. 5. A cleaner composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein component b) is hexylene glycol. 6. A cleaner composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein component c) is selected from optionally alkylated mono- or polyethers of a glycol or glycerine having 4 to 16 carbon atoms in total and/or glycol esters having 4-18 carbon atoms in total. 7. A cleaner composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, composed of 80-60 %wt of one or more of the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents containing at least 45% by weight naphthenes and 20-40 %wt of either one or more of the monohydric alcohols or one or more of the polyhydric alcohols, each of 9 to 16 carbon atoms. 8. A cleaner composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7, consisting of the one or more aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents, the one or more monohydric alcohols and the one or more polyhydric alco¬ hols, optionally together with the one or more glycol ethers and/or esters. 9. A cleaner composition as claimed in claim 8, composed of the one or more aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents and 1-10 %wt, preferably 5-10 %wt of hexylene glycol and 1-30 %wt of MIBC and/or DIBC. 10. Use of a cleaner composition as claimed in any one of claims 1-9, for removing ink.

Inventors: BEERS NICOLAAS CORNELIS MARIA, KEYZER LUCAS PETRUS SIMON, BEERS, NICOLAAS, CORNELIS, MARIA, KEYZER, LUCAS, PETRUS, SIMON
Applicants: SHELL CANADA LTD, SHELL INT RESEARCH, SHELL CANADA LIMITED, SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ B.V.
Application year: 1995
Main classification: C09D9
IPC codes: C09D9, C11D7