Article of footwear having multiple fluid containing members

Abstract: An article of footwear includes one or more first fluid containing cushion devices (59) in direct or elastomeric load transmitting contact with a foot to provide superior comfort. One or more second, preferably thicker, fluid containing cushion devices (53) are positioned in a load transmitting portion of the sole, between the foot and ground engaging surface of the footwear. The first cushion device(s) at least partially overlap a portion of the second cushioning device(s) and the two cushion devices are at least partially separated in any overlapping areas by a load distributing element (57).

Description: Field of the Invention This invention relates to articles of footwear having improved cushioning, comfort and stability. Particularly, this invention relates to articles of footwear that include cushioning devices which provide superior comfort to a wearer and provide superior performance under high loading conditions. Background of the Invention Articles of footwear have long been studied and redesigned to achieve enhanced comfort and performance. In this regard, and particularly in athletic shoes, primary concerns include the ability to provide the foot with a comfortable environment and to mitigate the shock or impact experienced when the shoe and, accordingly the foot and lower leg, impact the ground or floor. These forces are particularly significant during running and jumping. For example, a jogger landing on four or five square inches of the heel is estimated to absorb an impact force of about three to four times the weight of the jogger. Accordingly, a jogger of 180 pounds may create an approximate force of 720 pounds of shock on the heel landing area. Since each heel could impact the ground about 800 times per mile, it is easy to see the necessity of a shock absorbing mechanism in footwear. In addition to a shoe absorbing intense and repeated impact, the criticality of comfort is readily understood by everyone who wears shoes. In fact, comfort in athletic shoes is known to effect the wearer's psychological state, and therefore, his or her performance, muscular efficiency, energy consumption, and the athlete's ability to train and compete. A variety of elastomeric materials, including natural rubber, polymerized and copolymerized elastomers, and synthetic rubbers have been used in shoe construction to absorb these forces. However, these elastomeric materials suffer degradation from repeated use and have relatively poor energy transfer efficiency characteristics. Accordingly, the industry has searched for alternative means of foot cushioning. In this search, pneumatic cushioning devices have long been studied. For example, U.S. Patent 259,092 (1882) demonstrates a very early pneumatic sole. Notwithstanding the long search, pneumatic cushioning devices failed for nearly a century and for a variety of reasons to achieve commercial success. In fact, until the inventions described in U.S. Patents 4,183,156 and 4,219,945 were made, the art lacked the technological know-how to make pneumatic cushioning in shoes commercially successful. The inventions described in these patents revolutionized shoe design and the athletic footwear market place, having been incorporated into at least 200 million shoes sold worldwide. Following this initial success of pneumatic cushioning, several attempts to improve these systems have been made. U.S. Patent No. 4,506,460, for example, discloses a moderator device which functions in combination with either elastomeric or pneumatic cushioning elements. The moderator is used to absorb, redistribute, store and return energy. U.S. Patent No. 5,083,361 describes a shoe including a stacked air chamber arrangement. In this design, the air chambers are constructed with an outer barrier layer of elastomeric material with drop-linked fabric to average stress of the chambers and maintain stability. It is also suggested to inflate the top chamber to a lower pressure in order to provide initial contact softness. Taiwanese Application No. 75100322 discloses an outboard double deck air cushion where the peripheral air chambers in the top unit and the peripheral air chambers in the bottom unit are in fluid communication. The central air chambers of the top air cushion and those of the bottom air cushion are also in fluid communication. This design is intended to provide an air insert which continues to support the wearer after being punctured. For that purpose, the design includes a piercing proof sheet material such as a light metal between the first and second air cushions to prevent puncture of the upper cushion. However, this design, by allowing fluid communication between the top and bottom air cushions, may be unstable as a result of rapid, almost instantaneous, dispersion of air pressure under a load applied to localized areas. More particularly, this design appears to act more like a thick single cushion insert than two separate units. In fact, it is believed that this design leads to "bottoming out" of heavily loaded chambers and the simultaneous ballooning of unloaded chambers, causing instability when an uneven force is applied to the plantar surface of the foot or the outsole of the shoe. This instability termed herein a "tennis ball" effect appears to be particularly true when the cushions total more than 0.800 inches (2,032 cm) in thickness. Accordingly, this design presents an injury risk and fails to provide the advantage of superior comfort and superior performance in an article of footwear. According to figures 5 and 6 of US-A-4 914 836, a package of three face to face arranged cushioning layers is either put into the upper or into the sole. The cushioning layers do not laterally distribute load so that strongly localized forces are transmitted between the three cushioning layers. Each cushioning layer consists of a plurality of separate single cell fluid-impermeable tubular members disposed within respective chambers divided by walls. As is apparent from the above description of the art, a need exists for a cushioning system which provides both the comfort and performance benefits of fluid cushioning. This invention provides a means to achieve several very important goals; superior comfort in a shoe in combination with superior technical performance and lightness of weight. This is achieved by the article of footwear as claimed in claim 1 and the shoe as claimed in claim 10. Preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims. The first device of this shoe is preferably located within the shoe's foot constraining envelope, and is termed "inboard" for purposes of this disclosure. This location provides exceptional point-of-sale appeal, because the fluid containing cushion insert is in direct elastomeric proximity with the plantar surface of the foot, providing the wearer with a clear "riding-on-air" sensation (in the case of air filled inserts). Preferably, the second elastomeric device is located in the sole of the shoe, exterior and below the shoe upper envelope encasing the foot, and is termed "outboard". This cushion is preferably designed to absorb and beneficially redistribute, store and return significant impact forces. Accordingly, an article of footwear is described with a fluid containing elastomeric cushioning device adjacent the foot and a fluid containing elastomeric cushioning device more proximate the ground engaging surface of the shoe. In certain embodiments, the fluid containing cushioning device nearer the ground engaging surface of the shoe may be constructed with one side functioning as the ground engaging surface of the shoe. The load distributing element is located between the two cushioning devices to prevent painful and destabilizing localized forces and to facilitate load dispersion across the cushioning devices, increasing their effectiveness. In this design, the two cushioning devices respectively provide comfort and performance and, in fact, overall superior cushioning may occur. Therefore, this invention advantageously provides a new and improved article of footwear providing both superior comfort and performance. The second cushioning device comprises a first and a second air chamber being connected by a connecting passage. By this measure a gas movement between the chambers upon local impact is possible providing greater comfort and less jarring to the calcaneus and the remainder of the lower leg and body. Brief Description of the Drawings The invention consists of the novel parts, construction, arrangements, combinations and improvements shown and described. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated and constitute a part of the specification illustrate the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. Of the drawings: Figure 1 is a side elevation view of a shoe incorporating a preferred embodiment of the invention; Figure 2 is a diagrammatic view, partly in section and partly in elevation taken on line A-A of Fig. 1, under a standing load condition; Figure 3 is a diagrammatic view similar to Figure 2, partly in section and partly in elevation, of a preferred embodiment shoe structure incorporating cushioning devices containing compressible fluids and the load distributing element of the current invention under a moderate load; Figure 4 is a diagrammatic view similar to Figure 2, partly in section and partly in elevation, of a preferred embodiment shoe structure incorporating a cushioning device containing an incompressible fluid and the load distributing element of the current invention under a moderate load; Figure 5 is a diagrammatic view similar to Figures 3 and 4, partly in section and partly in elevation, of a prior art shoe structure incorporating two outboard cushion devices in fluid communication under a moderate load; Figure 6 is a graphical representation illustrating estimated load versus deflection and the associated comfort versus performance of a shoe including a preferred embodiment cushioning system; Figure 7 is a perspective view illustrating the unassembled parts of a preferred embodiment shoe; Figure 8 is a diagrammatic view partly in section and partly in elevation similar to Fig. 2, of an alternative embodiment of the inventive shoe; and Figure's 9A, 9B, 9C, and 9D are top views of exemplary load distributing elements. Detailed Description of the Invention Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiment of the invention, an example of which is illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in connection with the preferred embodiment, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to that embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications as may be included within the scope of the invention defined by the appended claims. Referring now to Figures 1 and 2, it may be seen that an article of footwear having an inboard cushioning device primarily for comfort and an outboard cushioning device primarily for absorbing high load is provided. The footwear includes an upper 1 generally made of leather, nylon or other material or other combination of materials known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Positioned within the upper 1 is a sockliner 2 comprised of an elastomeric material such as foam 3 , encapsulating at least the upper surface of an inboard fluid containing cushioning device 5 . Accordingly, the calcaneus bone 7 and fat pad 8 are in elastomeric contact with the inboard cushioning device 5 . The upper 1 is formed by any means acceptable to those of skill in the art such as, but not limited to, boardlasting or stitchlasting. The upper shown herein is appropriate for athletic shoes, however, sandal uppers and boot uppers are equally suited for combinations with the sole construction of this invention. The sole 9 is secured to the upper by glue and/or stitching, or other techniques well known to those skilled in the art. The preferred sole 9 comprises a midsole portion 13 and outsole portion 15 contacting the ground. The outsole portion 15 is generally textured with tread or studs 17 to facilitate good frictional engagement with the ground or a floor surface. Midsole 13 is comprised of a foam 21 encapsulated, outboard fluid containing cushioning device 23 , visible through view holes 19 . As is apparent, a load distributing element 24 is positioned intermediate the two cushioning devices 5 and 23 . A variety of cushioning devices and designs can be incorporated into this invention. In addition to the cushioning devices 5 and 23 , other preferred cushioning devices, their manner of production, assembly, and incorporation into footwear are described in U.S. Patents 3,005,272; 3,685,176; 3,760,056; 4,183,156; 4,217,705; 4,219,945; 4,271,606; 4,287,250; 4,297,797; 4,340,626; 4,370,754; 4,471,538; 4,486,901; 4,506,460; 4,724,627; 4,779,359; 4,817,304; 4,829,682; 4,864,737; 4,864,738; 4,906,502; 4,936,029; 5,042,176; 5,083,361; 5,097,607; 5,155,927; 5,228,217; 5,235,715; 5,245,766; 5,283,963; and 5,315,769. As will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, the cushioning inserts may be positioned as desired under the foot. Particularly preferred areas are under the heel, the longitudinal arch and under the metatarsals (i.e., the ball-of-the-foot). Included within the meaning of an inboard or outboard, first or second, cushioning device as used throughout this description are cushions comprised of multiple, separate and/or distinct cushioning peds. For example, the outboard cushioning device proximate the ground engaging surface of the shoe may be comprised of a heel ped and a separate toe ped. Accordingly, the heel and toe peds, although not connected, together are referred to herein as one outboard cushioning device. Preferably, the elastomeric material of the cushioning devices is selected from the following: polyurethane, polyester elastomer; fluoroelastomer; chlorinated polyethylene, polyvinylchloride; chlorosulfinated polyethylene; polyethylene/ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer; neoprene; butadiene acrylonitrile rubber; butadiene styrene rubber; ethylene propylene polymer; natural rubber; high strength silicone rubber; low density polyethylene; adduct rubber; sulfide rubber; methyl rubber; and thermoplastic rubber. One material that is particularly preferred is polyurethane film. When a compressible fluid is desired, the elastomeric members are preferably filled with a compressible "supergas" comprising a non-polar large molecule gas or gases and air. These fall within the self-inflating, via diffusion pumping technology, of the above described prior patents. Gases which have been found suitable are as follows: hexafluoroethane; sulfur hexafluoride; perfluoro propane; perfluorobutane; perfluoropentane; perfluorohexane; perfluoroheptane; octafluorocyclobutane; perfluorocylobutane; hexafluoropropylene; tetrafluoromethane; monochloropentafluoroethane; 1,2-dichlorotetra-fluoroethane; 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane; chlorotrifluoroethylene; bromotrifluoromethane; and monochlorotrifluoromethane. The two most desirable gases for use in the members are hexafluoroethane and sulfur hexafluoride. Of course, contemplated within the scope of this invention are cushioning devices filled with other compressible fluids in combination with foams and mechanically inflated gas (including air) cushioning devices. Alternatively, the elastomeric member can be filled with a incompressible fluid which is generally a liquid or gel. The preferred characteristics of the fluid are that it is non-toxic, preferably odor free, it does not freeze at temperatures to which the article of footwear is normally exposed, and it possesses an acceptable viscosity, for example, 1,000 to 1,250 centistokes. Incompressible fluids such as water; semi-gel liquids; oil; grease; soft or liquid wax; glycerine; soft soaps; silicone; rheopexic fluids; thixotropic fluids; and corn syrups exemplify but are not limiting examples of acceptable fluids. The fluid can also be treated with a bactericide or anti-fungal agent for their obvious benefits. In addition, cushioning members utilizing incompressible fluids have also been designed to include the combination of a particulate material and a liquid to tailor the viscosity and cushioning characteristics. Phenolic resin particles, silica and ceramic spheres are examples of particulate material which may be utilized. Of course, at least two cushioning devices of the invention can each be filled with different materials, i.e. air in the inboard cushion and viscous silicone oil in the outboard cushion. In addition, the cushioning devices may be filled with a combination of incompressible fluid and compressible fluid. The article of footwear in Figure 2 is now referred to for illustration of certain properties of the invention. Particularly, a fluid containing inboard cushioning device is positioned to provide substantially uninterrupted elastic cushioning to the foot within the foot constraining envelope of the shoe. This provides the article of footwear user with a "riding-on-air" feel (when air/gas filled) and the associated high degree of comfort. A generally thicker (defined along the axis between the foot and ground engaging surface of the shoe) and generally higher pressurized fluid containing outboard cushioning device (if a compressible fluid cushioning device is utilized) is positioned in the midsole. This thicker, higher pressure outboard cushioning device primarily functions to absorb and distribute high load conditions encountered during running, jumping, stopping and blocking. The following examples illustrated by Figures 3, 4, and 5 comparatively demonstrate the useful and beneficial results achieved by this invention. Figure 3 illustrates the footwear of the present invention under a moderate load. Moreover, Figure 3 illustrates the load distribution mechanism of the current invention when uneven loading is applied. As illustrated, the foam encapsulated outboard performance oriented cushioning device 53 is compressed to absorb impact of the shoe with the ground having an uneven surface (a rock). Compression of individual chambers 53a, 53b and 53c is more significant as a result of the added stresses to the outsole 55 at the point of engagement with the rock. However, the load distributing element 57 prevents significant localized vertical deflection, effecting a horizontal force distribution of the high localized load, transferring the forces of the individual chambers ( 53a, 53b and 53c ) across a large surface area of the inboard downward deflecting comfort insert 59 . Accordingly, the load is more equally distributed across the fat pad of the heel 61 , reducing the possibility of instability or a stone bruise to the heel of the foot by the outboard cushioning chambers 53a, 53b , and 53c pushed upward by the rock. In addition, the shoe design more evenly distributes the force as the gas moves from chambers 53a , 53b and 53c into chambers 53d and 53e , providing greater comfort and less jarring to the calcaneus 63 and the remainder of the lower leg and body. Under a light load, the inboard insert 59 supported on an appropriate load distributing element 57 provides a perceived, dynamic, instantaneous, plantar foot shape conforming "riding-on-air", comfort and support for the foot. Under higher loads, the inboard cushioning device 59 deflects and cushions in a downward motion against the load distributing element 57 through its full range of cushioning support from the maximum thickness at an unloaded condition to a bottoming out condition. Coincidentally, additional deformation of outboard device 53 occurs and higher shock loads are absorbed. The load distributing element provides a load supportive, flexible, dynamic plane, which is either flat or anatomically contoured. This plane separates the normally downward load deflection and cushioned forces of the foot all or in part, from the upward vectored shock forces absorbed and cushioned substantially by the outboard cushioning device, emanating from the impact of the shoe outsole with the floor or ground. Referring now to Figure 4, the footwear of the present invention under a moderate load is demonstrated wherein the outboard cushioning device 153 is a incompressible fluid design. In this design, the outboard cushioning device 153 is encapsulated within midsole 155 . Cushioning device 153 is flexibly secured at its top and bottom surfaces with an elastomeric encapsulating foam 158 . Under a moderate load with a uneven force distribution caused by the rock, incompressible fluid 151 is forced from the central region of cushioning device 153 flowing in the direction of arrows 152 toward the periphery 156 of the cushioning device. Fluid flow causes an increased pressure at the periphery 156 of the cushioning device and a bulging of the elastomeric cushioning device in this side wall area. Accordingly, shock forces are absorbed by the elastomeric action of the peripheral chamber walls 156 and the forced fluid flow. As in Figure 3, load distributing element 157 disperses uneven forces caused by the rock more uniformly across the inboard cushioning member 159 . Therefore, the fat pad 161 and calcaneus 163 are not subject to instability or a stone bruise. Although Figure 4 demonstrates a outboard incompressible fluid cushioning device and an inboard compressible fluid cushioning device, these elements could be reversed or incompressible cushioning units could be utilized both inboard and outboard. While the outboard incompressible fluid cushioning device is shown as a single unit, including an adjacent cavity for expansion, a variety of designs can clearly be utilized in the present invention. For example, multi-chambered units having fluid connections between at least some of the units can be used. In addition, flow restrictors may be utilized between the chambers to tailor the fluid flow to meet required cushioning demands. Other designs include a heel chamber connected via channels to a chamber under the metatarsals causing fluid flow toward the forward chamber on heel strike and rearward during toe off. Particularly preferred incompressible fluid containing designs include a small amount of compressible fluid in the chamber or a connected chamber containing predominantly incompressible fluid which allows compression within the chamber to occur in addition to expansion of the elastomeric cushioning walls when a load is applied. The same moderate load conditions are demonstrated in Figure 5, however, both upper and lower cushioning devices are outboard and are in fluid communication (not shown) with one another. This illustration demonstrates the importance of having fluid independence of the two cushioning inserts to provide stability and achieve a comfortable and high performance cushioning effect. Under conditions repeating those of Figures 3 and 4, the shoe of Figure 5, with fluid communication between the cushioning units, leads to discomfort, instability and possible foot injury. More particularly, when a localized high load area (a rock in this example) is encountered by the shoe outsole 65 , forces are transmitted upward through the cushioning member 67 , leading to upward deflection of the outboard chambers 67a and 67b . Because cushioning member 67 is in fluid communication with cushioning member 73 , under applied load, the fluid pressure in all chambers of cushioning members 67 and 73 nearly instantaneously equalize. Chambers 67a and 67b , bottom-out and press upwardly against cushioning member 73 . Since there is no load distributing member the cushioning members also thrust upwardly, pressing against the bottom surface of the foot creating a very uncomfortable and painful bulge within the shoe. Chambers 67a and 67b , 73a and 73b , nearly totally bottom out allowing the pressure of the rock to transmit almost directly into fat pad 71 of the heel of the foot. The fluid communication between the upper and lower cushioning members results in instability characteristic of a single very thick air cushion device and provides an excellent example of a "tennis ball" effect. Furthermore, the outboard cushioning design of both members 67 and 73 fail to provide the distinct comfort associated with the "riding-on-air" feel, characteristic of the inboard positioning of one of the cushioning members. Accordingly, Figures 3 and 4 evidence how a preferred embodiment functions in a unique, novel, and highly beneficial way over prior art designs. It achieves the best of both worlds, i.e., the "riding-on-air" cushioned comfort, softness, formability and pliancy which is dynamically integrated with the technical and sophisticated world of high impact energy absorption, distribution, storage and efficient dynamic energy return, as well as rear and forefoot stability, motion control, banked track effect when stopping and blocking, injury protection, orthotic support, pronation control, etc. Figure 6 graphically represents the predicted load versus deflection performance of the subject invention. At a standing load, a relatively low pressure comfort cushioning device (curve "A") undergoes a significant amount of its potential deflection providing a "riding-on-air" feel. As load increases, the comfort cushioning device bottoms out. However, the performance cushioning device (curve "B") is rapidly undergoing deflection, while absorbing, cushioning, distributing, storing the potentially damaging impact force, and eventually returning this otherwise wasted energy to the wearer as a beneficial propulsion force. At maximum load, both the comfort cushioning device and performance cushioning device approach bottoming out. The two cushions functioning together in tandem, spread the impact force over the greatest possible time interval, achieving maximum cushioning. Curve "C" shows the combined and unique synergistic effect of the two cushioning devices. It is believed that when single air filled cushioning devices exceed 0.800 inches (2,032 cm) in shoes, instability arises as a result of a "tennis ball" effect. Furthermore, when multiple air chambers are placed one atop the other to achieve a thickness greater than eight hundred thousandths of an inch, instability arises. In contrast, as shown in the current invention, a load distributing device between the upper and lower fluid containing cushioning inserts redistributes forces between the two chambers sufficiently to substantially avoid the "tennis ball" effect and allows the combined thickness of the two inserts to exceed 0.800 inches. Accordingly, cushioning inserts totalling a combined thickness of greater than 0.800 inches would appear to be effective when constructed in accord with the subject invention. As should be apparent to those skilled in the art, this feature significantly improves the cushioning ability of the shoe without a loss in stability. Figure 7 represents the individual components in the exploded preconstruction stage of a preferred embodiment of (the invention. In this embodiment, a sockliner 42 is positioned over an inboard fluid containing multichamber cushioning device 43 . Both are positioned within the shoe upper 44 on top of load distributing element 45 comprised of a mesh, the filaments of which have a high tensile strength such as nylon, polyester, kevlar, fiberglass, metal, etc. which is optionally substituted for Robus or Texon board or cement reinforced fabric of a "stitch lasted" shoe. This shoe is then laid-up on top of performance fluid containing multichamber cushions 47 and 47a secured in midsole 49 . In this embodiment, performance cushions 47 and 47a can be either permanently inflated ( 47a ) or may be inflated with a valve 46 . In one construction embodiment, it is envisioned that upper 44 would be secured around a last (not shown) and its fabric or other material sealed at its base by the load distributing element 45 . The outboard performance fluid containing cushioning device is preferably foam encapsulated as an integral part of midsole 49 . The outsole 51 is cemented to the midsole and the resultant product is securely cemented or otherwise attached to the shoe upper comprising the load distributing element. As can be seen, the cushioning devices are generally thicker in the heel area where maximum loading occurs, with the performance cushioning device being thicker than the comfort cushioning device. Figure 8 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the invention, wherein shoe upper 101 is glued and/or stitched at its lower periphery 103 to an air filled cushion device 105 . Air cushion device 105 is positioned above load distributing element 124 . This air cushion comprises elastomeric layers 126a and 126b mechanically bonded with a drop thread linked fabric 128 as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,906,502 and 5,083,361. Additionally, the comfort factor may further be enhanced by the use of a conventional anatomically shaped foam (or equivalent) sock liner 125 . A second performance oriented cushioning device 123 is placed in midsole 113 . Again, cushioning device 123 is foam 121 encapsulated. In this embodiment, calcaneus 107 and fat pad 108 are in elastomeric contact with comfort air cushion 105 . Accordingly, the cushion device actually forms part of the lasted base of the foot enveloping upper. In this design, the cushioning device is functionally positioned inboard, and it remains in uninterrupted cushioning contact with the foot. In this embodiment of the subject invention, the contiguous board-lasted or stitch lasted components of the shoe upper 103 can perform, at least in part, the function of the load distributing element, positioned between the first and second air cushioning devices 105 and 123 . The load distributing element(s) function in a key role in the subject invention, setting it apart from prior cushioning endeavors because it separates and isolates, at least in part, the function and load/deflection characteristics of the fluid containing cushioning device(s) positioned within the footwear constraining envelope of the shoe, i.e., the inboard component, from the lower fluid containing cushioning device(s) positioned within the midsole of the shoe, i.e., the outboard component. It is important to recognize that simply positioning one of the cushioning devices above the other cushioning device regardless of their pressurization, will result in an article of footwear having unacceptable dynamic instability similar to standing on a tennis ball if one or more load distributing element(s) is not utilized. The load distributing element, in its multitude of various designs, shapes and materials, is a particularly important component of the invention, characterizing and distinguishing it from several prior attempts to incorporate liquid or pneumatic type cushions into stacked or nested designs. In some areas, such as directly beneath the calcaneus, it may be desirable to have the inboard and outboard cushioning devices working in part in unison to achieve a more significant deflection under maximum impact loading. Accordingly, the load distributing element may be cut out in the area below the calcaneus, i.e. in a "U"-shaped pattern. Thus, the maximum allowable deflection can be accomplished so as to spread the impact load over the maximum achievable time interval. In this manner, within the overall design constraints, the shoe transmits the lowest possible shock force to the foot, leg, body and head of the wearer. However, the cut-out region cannot be so extensive as to result in instability. Moreover, it is believed that at least the periphery of the load distribution element must remain intact to prevent a "tennis ball" effect. In the preferred embodiment, the load distributing element lies under at least 40% and preferably 50% at the foot's heel pad. Preferably, the load distributing element comprises a flexible, thin and lightweight material which redistributes localized forces laterally across the interface of the two or more cushioning devices. The load distributing element separates and at least partially isolates and maximizes the beneficial features of the upper and lower fluid cushioning devices to optimize comfort, cushioning, and performance and simultaneously prevent localization of forces leading to various undesirable consequences including a foot injury, a "tennis ball" effect and/or an aneurism failure of the pressurized device. Particularly, preferred load distributing elements support at least the heel and metatarsal areas. These areas receive the greatest load and are most prone to injury and bottoming out. Accordingly, forces are more evenly distributed across the cushioning devices and the load distributing element itself may absorb and store some energy. Materials used include Robus board, Texon board, a stitch lasted base of the upper, kevlar, metal mesh or fiber reinforced composites or combinations thereof. Certain load distributing elements, such as high modulus of elasticity materials, may also be utilized to provide energy return. A load distributing element suitable for use in this invention is described in U.S. Patents 4,506,460 and 4,486,964. The load distributing element can be of any shape required to redistribute force. In fact, the type of athletic shoe may determine the load distributing element shape. Moreover, tennis shoes may require a greater load distributing element effect in the forefoot and running shoes in the heel. Several exemplary load distributing elements are shown in Figures 9A, 9B, 9C and 9D. As described herein, forces within the shoe sole are considered normal in the plane of the load distributing element. Nominally vertical forces travel downward from the foot through the upper cushion to the load distributing element and upward from the outsole through the lower cushion to the load distributing element. The load distributing element distributes forces generally horizontally across the shoe and the two interactive cushioning devices, preventing a "tennis ball" effect. In the case of a "U-shaped" heel load distributing element, interaction occurs locally between the first and second cushioning members in the center of the heel which greatly dissipates the high load force under the calcaneus as a result of a greater deflection and absorption of shock load. Shock forces to the foot, leg, and body are significantly reduced. These designs avoid adding unnecessary weight to the shoe and maximize the interactive and load absorption and distribution nature of the top and bottom units in high impact areas while maintaining stability. The load distributing element may be comprised of either a low modulus (below about 250,000 psi) material or an intermediate (between about 250,000 and 1,000,000 psi) or high (above about 1,000,000 psi) modulus material or combinations thereof depending on the desired end objective. U.S. Patent Nos. 4,486,964 and 4,506,460 directed to a spring load distributing element/stabilizer device clearly define the benefits of an intermediate and high modulus type of load distributing element. However, it should be noted that conventional shoe components utilized in constructing the shoe upper, and particularly the area supporting the plantar surface of the foot, are equally acceptable and fully functional within the scope of the subject invention, often without any significant modification. Accordingly, the load distributing element of the current invention could comprise, but is not limited to, the board of board lasted shoes, the board of tuck board lasted shoes and the reinforced cemented fabric of stitch lasted shoes. In addition, other portions of the shoe which may, depending on shoe construction, lie intermediate the inboard and outboard cushioning components such as, but not limited to, the heel counter, stabilizers, cantilevered support components, may form individually or as combinations of other components, the load distributing element. It should be recognized that a spring type load distributing element has been shown to add improved stability and provide a significant energy return to the user; for example, the storage and return of impact energy can be as much as 6% more energy efficient than with a shoe structure without a spring load distributing element/air cushion combination. Furthermore, the use of the load distributing element has allowed the construction of air cushioning soles of significant thickness while achieving good to excellent stability. Moreover, a shoe has now been provided with superior comfort, i.e., a "riding-on-air" feel in combination with superior technical performance. Previously, it has been necessary to sacrifice comfort to achieve performance and vice-versa. In addition, the combination of these two fluid filled cushioning devices in combination with the load distributing element has the effect of providing greater cushioning in extreme loading conditions without bottoming out or instability. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, an inboard cushioning device adjacent the foot has a thickness of less than 0.350 inches (0,889 cm) more preferably about 0.250 inches (0,635 cm). This requirement is important because movement of the foot within the upper, when exceeding more than one-third of an inch (0,847 cm) has been found to cause sufficient rubbing between the foot and the heel counter and other sections of the shoe resulting in uncontrolled movement of the foot within the envelope of the article of footwear and blistering, irritation and abrasion of the foot surface. For optimum performance during high impact athletic endeavors, the outboard cushioning device below the load distributing element will preferably have a thickness of at least 0.400 inches (1,016 cm), more preferably greater than 0.750 inches (1,905 cm). When a compressible fluid is utilized the cushioning device adjacent the foot is preferably pressurized to between greater than 0 and 20 pounds per square inch as defined by gage pressure and the cushioning device below the load distributing element is pressurized to a gage pressure of between about 5 and 50 pounds per square inch. The 0 and 20 pounds of pressure provides a soft feel to the foot, i.e. a highly resilient cushion. The 5 to 50 pounds of pressure in the device below the load distributing element absorbs, distributes, stores, and returns potentially damaging and otherwise wasted impact energy in an energy efficient manner during walking, running and jumping. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment, the shoe is provided with a "softer" cushioning device adjacent the foot to provide comfort, i.e. "riding-on-air", while the cushioning device adjacent the ground has a higher pressure and generally a greater thickness, providing high impact absorbance and stability for an athletic shoe. The phrase "riding-on-air" is appropriate because a preferred cushioning device is pressurized with a compressible fluid such as gas or air. When an incompressible fluid is utilized, the cushion members are not required to be pressurized. Preferably, the elastomeric cushioning device is filled to about 0 p.s.i.g. In addition, the inventive shoe design facilitates customizing, optimizing and tailoring of the shoes comfort and performance characteristics. Moreover, the cushioning device adjacent the foot can be designed to have a lower pressure than the cushioning device adjacent the ground. In fact, the lower pressure comfort cushion adjacent the foot can be manufactured in a range of pressures and combined with a high pressure performance cushion having its own range of pressures to provide a shoe with a great diversity of applications, tailoring the shoes capabilities for different sports and sex or weight of the wearer. As will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, certain designs may incorporate the cushioning device adjacent the foot into the sock liner of the shoe. The cushioning device below the load distributing element can be comprised of one or several foam encapsulated multichamber units, a single chamber non-foam encapsulated unit or a combination thereof, i.e. foam encapsulation is not required. Thus, it is apparent that there has been provided, in accordance with the invention, an article of footwear that fully satisfies the objects, aims and advantages set forth above. While the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations would be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims: An article of footwear comprising a sole (9), said sole (9) comprising a midsole (13; 155; 49; 113) and an outsole (15; 55; 51) disposed below said midsole (13; 155; 49; 113); a fluid containing first cushioning device (5; 59; 159; 43; 105) of elastomeric material disposed above a top surface of said midsole (13; 155; 49; 113) and beneath a wearer's foot; and a second cushioning device (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) of elastomeric material between said top surface of said midsole (13; 155; 49; 113) and said outsole (15; 55; 51), said second cushioning device (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) including a first air chamber, a second air chamber and a connecting passage connecting said first chamber and said second chamber; said first cushioning device at least partially overlapping said second device; a load distributing element (24; 57; 157; 45; 124) located between said first cushioning device (5; 59; 159; 43; 105) and said second cushioning device (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) between at least a portion of said overlapping region of said first and second cushioning devices. An article of footwear according to claim 1, wherein said second cushioning device (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) includes multichambered units having fluid connection between at least some of the units. An article of claim 1, wherein said elastomeric material of said first device (5; 59; 159; 43; 105) and second device (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) is comprised of polyurethane. The article of claim 1, wherein said first device (5; 59; 159; 43; 105) is positioned only under a portion of said foot. The article of claim 1, wherein the fluid in at least one of said devices (5; 59; 159; 43; 105), (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) is compressible. The article of claim 1, wherein the fluid in at least one of said devices (5; 59; 159; 43; 105), (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) is incompressible. The article of claim 5, wherein said first device (5; 59; 159; 43; 105) has a gage pressure of between 0 and 20 psi and said second device (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) has a gage pressure of between about 15 and 50 psi. The article of claim 5, wherein the fluid in at least one of said devices (5; 59; 159; 43; 105), (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) comprises a mixture of air and a gas selected from the group consisting of hexafluoroethane; sulfur hexafluoride; perfluoropropane; perfluorobutane; perfluoropentane; perfluorohexane; perfluoroheptane; octafluorocyclobutane; perfluorocyclobutane; hexafluoropropylene; tetrafluoromethane; monochloropentafluoroethane;1,2-dichlorotetra-fluoroethane;1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane; chlorotrifluoroethylene; bromotrifluoromethane; and monochlorotrifluoromethane and mixtures thereof. The article of claim 1, wherein said load distributing element (24; 57; 187; 45; 124) is comprised of a flexible and resilient material. A shoe including a sole (9) and an upper (1; 44; 101) and further comprising a first fluid containing cushioning device (5; 59; 159; 43; 105) at a first pressure, said first device (5; 59; 159; 43; 105) positioned within the shoe's foot constraining envelope (1; 44; 101) in a load transmitting position intermediate a foot and a ground engaging portion of said shoe; a second fluid containing cushioning device (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) at a second higher pressure, said second device (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) positioned exterior and below the shoe's foot constraining envelope in a load transmitting position intermediate at least a portion of said first device and a ground engaging portion of said shoe, said first device (5; 59; 159; 43; 105) and said second device (23; 53; 153; 47; 123) being separated from one another by an intermediate area with a load distributing element (24; 57) arranged within this area for effecting lateral force distribution between said first device and said second device, the load distributing element comprising board, a stitch lasted base of the upper, reinforced cemented fabric of stitch lasted shoes, kevlar, metal mesh or fibre reinforced composites, or combinations thereof.

Inventors: RUDY MARION FRANKLIN, RUDY, MARION FRANKLIN
Applicants: RUDY MARION F, RUDY, MARION FRANKLIN
Application year: 1995
Main classification: A43B13
IPC codes: A43B13