Optical wavelength filter with reduced sidelobes and simple design

Abstract: An optical wavelength filter has a polarizer, an analyzer, and an optical waveguide, formed in a substrate displaying an acousto-optic effect, that guides light from the polarizer to the analyzer. A transducer formed on the substrate excites a surface acoustic wave, thus creating an acoustic beam. The amplitude of the surface acoustic wave is small at the two sides of the acoustic beam and larger in the middle. The optical waveguide enters the acoustic beam at a point on one of the two sides of the beam, then moves into the center of the beam, and exits the beam at another point on one of the two sides.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to an optical wavelength filter of the acousto-optic type. A filter of this type has an optical waveguide formed in a substrate that displays acoustic-optic effects. The effect employed is the conversion of light of a particular wavelength from one mode of propagation to another mode through interaction with a surface acoustic wave (SAW), enabling that particular wavelength to be extracted by means of crossed polarizers placed at opposite ends of the optical waveguide. Filters of this type are useful in wavelength-division multiplexed fiber-optic communication systems. A common problem of these filters is that their wavelength transmission characteristics have unwanted sidelobes, leading to crosstalk in adjacent wavelength channels. It has been found that the sidelobes can be considerably reduced by weighting the acoustic-optic coupling coefficient so that it varies along the length of the optical waveguide. Basically, the coupling coefficient should be small at the ends of the interaction region between the surface acoustic wave and light signal, and rise to a peak in the middle of the interaction region. A known method of weighting the coupling coefficient in this way is to generate the surface acoustic wave with an interdigital transducer having a curved shape that focuses the surface acoustic wave toward the middle of the interaction region. One problem with this method is that the coupling coefficient for a curved transducer is difficult to calculate, making the filter design difficult to optimise. Another problem is that in conventional designs the optical waveguide passes under the transducer, where the coupling coefficient varies abruptly. Abrupt variation is itself a source of sidelobes, making it difficult to reduce crosstalk beyond a certain point. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, Nov. 1993, USA. Vol. 40, no. 6, ISSN 0885-3010 pages 814-818, Yamamoto Y et al 'Suppression of sidelobe levels for guided-wave acousto-optic tunable filters using weighted coupling' describes sidelobe level suppression in guided-wave acousto-optic tunable filters using a varying aperture SAW slot waveguide. The present invention aims to simplify the design of an optical wavelength filter of the acousto-optic type. The present invention also aims to improve sidelobe suppression in an optical wavelength filter of the acousto-optic type. According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided an optical wavelength filter, comprising a polarizer, an analyzer, a substrate capable of displaying an acousto-optic effect, a transducer formed on said substrate, for exciting a surface acoustic wave (SAW), first and second longitudinal SAW confinement barriers formed in said substrate defining the boundaries of a SAW waveguide, said SAW waveguide having a first end disposed near said transducer, a second end, and a middle portion disposed between said first end and said second end, for guiding said surface acoustic wave from said first end to said second end, and an optical waveguide formed in said substrate, for guiding light from said polarizer through said SAW waveguide to said analyzer, characterised in that said optical waveguide is disposed nearer to the first barrier than to the second barrier at said first end, disposed substantially centrally between said barriers in said middle portion of said SAW waveguide, and disposed nearer to the second barrier than the first barrier at said second end, whereby to provide a weighting of the acousto-optic coupling coefficient such that the acousto-optic coupling coefficient varies along the length of the optical waveguide. According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an optical wavelength filter, comprising a polarizer, an analyzer, a substrate capable of displaying an acousto-optic effect, a transducer formed on said substrate, for exciting a surface acoustic wave (SAW), first and second longitudinal SAW confinement barriers formed in said substrate defining the boundaries of a SAW waveguide, said SAW waveguide having a first end disposed near said transducer, a second end, and a middle portion disposed between said first end and said second end, for guiding said surface acoustic wave from said first end to said second end, and an optical waveguide formed in said substrate, for guiding light from said polarizer through said SAW waveguide to said analyzer, characterised in that said optical waveguide is disposed nearer to the first barrier than to the second barrier at said first and second ends and disposed substantially centrally between said barriers in said middle portion of said SAW waveguide, whereby to provide a weighting of the acousto-optic coupling coefficient such that the acousto-optic coupling coefficient varies along the length of the optical waveguide. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a plan view of a first embodiment of the invented optical wavelength filter; FIG. 2 is a graph of the SAW amplitude along line A-A in FIG. 1; FIG. 3 is a graph of the SAW amplitude along line B-B in FIG. 1; FIG. 4 illustrates a first variation of the optical wavelength filter in FIG. 1; FIG. 5 illustrates a second variation of the optical wavelength filter in FIG. 1. FIG. 6 illustrates a third variation of the optical wavelength filter in FIG. 1. FIG. 7 illustrates a fourth variation of the optical wavelength filter in FIG. 1. FIG. 8 illustrates a fifth variation of the optical wavelength filter in FIG. 1. FIG. 9 illustrates a sixth variation of the optical wavelength filter in FIG. 1. FIG. 10 illustrates a seventh variation of the optical wavelength filter in FIG. 1. FIG. 11 is a plan view of a first illustrative example of an optical wavelength filter. FIG. 12 is a graph of the SAW amplitude along the optical waveguide in FIG. 1. FIG. 13 is a graph of an ideal acoustic power distribution along the optical waveguide. FIG. 14 is a graph of the acoustic power distribution along the optical waveguide of a conventional optical wavelength filter. FIG. 15 is a graph of a window function. FIG. 16 is a plan view of a second illustrative example of an optical wavelength filter. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION An embodiment of the invention, and several variations of this embodiment, will be described with reference to the attached illustrative drawings. The first embodiment, shown in FIG. 1, is an optical wavelength filter formed in an X-cut, Y-propagating lithiumniobate substrate 10 three centimeters long. Lithium niobate (LiNbO 3 ) is a well-known material displaying acoustic-optic effects. An interdigital transducer 12 for exciting a surface acoustic wave is formed on the substrate 10. The transducer 12 comprises two comb-shaped electrodes with ten fingers apiece (the drawing shows only two of the ten fingers). The fingers are 100 µ m long and are spaced at a 20- µ m pitch. A pair of barriers 14 and 15 are formed, e.g. by diffusion into the substrate 10 of an impurity that alters the speed of sound in the substrate 10. The diffusion may be either into the barriers 14 and 15 themselves, or into the area between them. The barriers 14 and 15 in this embodiment have straight, parallel sides. The area between the barriers 14 and 15 is a SAW waveguide 16. The speed of sound is higher in the barriers 14 and 15 than in the SAW waveguide 16. The front end 16a of the SAW waveguide 16 is located near the transducer 12. An optical waveguide 18 is also formed by diffusion of an impurity into the substrate 10. The optical waveguide 18 in this embodiment has a straight-line configuration that is oriented at a non-zero angle to the longitudinal axis of the SAW waveguide 16. The optical waveguide 18 passes below the transducer 12, enters the front end 16a of the SAW waveguide 16 near barrier 15, and leaves the back end 16b of the SAW waveguide 16 near barrier 14. In the middle portion 16c of the SAW waveguide 16, the optical waveguide 18 is disposed centrally between the two barriers 14 and 15. A SAW absorber 20 is provided behind the transducer 12 to absorb surface acoustic waves propagating away from the SAW waveguide 16. Another SAW absorber 21 is provided at the back end 16b of the SAW waveguide 16, to absorb surface acoustic waves leaving the SAW waveguide 16. The optical waveguide 18 terminates at a polarizer 22 and analyzer 24. These are crossed so that they transmit light polarized in different directions. The polarizer 22 passes TE-mode light, which is polarized in a plane parallel to the plane of the substrate 10, while the analyzer 22 passes TM-mode light, which is polarized in a plane perpendicular to the plane of the substrate 10. FIG. 2 is a graph of the SAW amplitude along the line A-A in FIG. 1, at the front end 16a of the SAW waveguide 16. The SAW amplitude is indicated by the height of a curve I above the substrate 10. The SAW amplitude starts from substantially zero in barrier 14, rises to a peak midway between barriers 14 and 15, then falls back to substantially zero in barrier 15. The acoustic power is proportional to the square of the SAW amplitude. Since the optical waveguide 18 is disposed near barrier 15, a comparatively small amount of acoustic power is coupled with the light in the optical waveguide 18, which is to say that the acousto-optic coupling coefficient is small at this point. FIG. 3 is a graph of the SAW amplitude along the line B-B in FIG. 1, in the middle portion 16c of the SAW waveguide 16. The SAW amplitude is indicated by the height of a curve II, which has substantially the same profile as curve I in FIG. 2. Here the optical waveguide 18 is disposed midway between the barriers 14 and 15, so a comparatively large amount of acoustic power is coupled with the light in the optical waveguide 18. The SAW amplitude profile at the back end 16b of the SAW waveguide 16 is similar to that in FIG. 2, with the optical waveguide 18 disposed near barrier 14. The acousto-optic coupling coefficient is small at both ends of the SAW waveguide 16 and larger in the middle. Next, the operation of this optical wavelength filter will be explained. The interdigital transducer 12 is electrically driven at a power of, for example, 13 dBm with a certain frequency, producing surface acoustic waves at this frequency. The surface acoustic waves travel through the SAW waveguide 16 from the front end 16a to the back end 16b, confined between the barriers 14 and 15 as indicated in FIGs. 2 and 3 because the speed of sound is higher in the barriers 14 and 15 than in the SAW waveguide 16. Signal light is coupled into the optical waveguide 18 by the polarizer 22, and propagates into the SAW waveguide 16 in the TE mode. As the signal light travels down the SAW waveguide 16, interaction with the surface acoustic waves changes the polarization by an amount that depends on the optical wavelength and SAW frequency. For a certain wavelength of light, the polarization is converted from the TE mode at the front end 16a to the TM mode at the back end 16b. The SAW frequency can be selected so that light of a certain desired wavelength in the vicinity of 1.55 µ m, for example, is converted from the TE mode to the TM mode. The analyzer 24 passes only light propagating in the TM mode, so it passes only the signal light of this desired wavelength. Due to the SAW absorbers 20 and 21, interaction between the signal light and surface acoustic waves takes place mainly in the SAW waveguide 16. From FIGs. 1 to 3 it can be seen that as signal light propagates down the SAW waveguide 16, the acousto-optic coupling coefficient changes gradually from weak at the front end 16a to strong in the middle portion 16c, then back to weak again at the back end 16b. As discussed earlier, this weighting of the coupling coefficient reduces sidelobes in the transmission characteristic of the filter. If the ratio of the acoustic power coupled with the signal light at the front end 16a (FIG. 2) to the acoustic power coupled in the middle portion 16c (FIG. 3) is about 1:3, for example, the sidelobe suppression ratio will be approximately 20 dB. This favorable sidelobe suppression is moreover achieved with an extremely simple structure, employing a straight interdigital transducer 12 and straight waveguides. This makes the coupling coefficient and other filter parameters relatively easy to compute, and the filter easy to design. Since the optical waveguide 18 passes under the transducer 12, it passes through a region where abrupt variation occurs in the coupling coefficient. The optical waveguide 18 however passes through the side of this region, where the SAW amplitude is small to begin with, so the variation, although abrupt, is not large. Variations of this first embodiment will be described next with reference to FIGs. 4 to 9. All of these variations operate in substantially the same way as the embodiment in FIG. 1, and offer the same advantages. In FIG. 4, the barriers 14 and 15 are parallel but bent, so that the SAW waveguide 16 has a chevron shape. The optical waveguide 18 is straight. The optical waveguide 18 passes near barrier 15 at the front and back ends 16a and 16b of the SAW waveguide 16, and is disposed centrally between the barriers 14 and 15 in the middle portion 16c of the SAW waveguide 16. In FIG. 5, the barriers 14 and 15 are straight, but the optical waveguide 18 is bent. As in FIG. 4, the optical waveguide 18 passes near barrier 15 at the front and back ends 16a and 16b of the SAW waveguide 16, and is disposed centrally between barriers 14 and 15 in the middle portion 16c. In FIG. 6, barrier 14 is straight and barrier 15 is bent in a V-shape, so that it tapers away from barrier 14 at both ends. The optical waveguide 18 is similarly bent, and parallels barrier 15. In the middle portion 16c of the SAW waveguide 16, the optical waveguide 18 is disposed centrally between the two barriers 14 and 15. At the front and back ends 16a and 16b, where the barriers 14 and 15 are farther apart, the optical waveguide 18 is relatively closer to barrier 15. This configuration also results in a coupling coefficient that is small at the front and back ends 16a and 16b and large in the middle portion 16c. FIG. 7 is similar to FIG. 6 in that the optical waveguide 18 and barrier 15 are parallel and bent, but the bend in FIG. 7 is a smooth curve. As in FIG. 6, the optical waveguide 18 is disposed centrally between the two barriers 14 and 15 in the central portion 16c of the SAW waveguide 16, and is relatively closer to barrier 15 at the front and back ends 16a and 16b. In FIG. 8, the barriers 14 and 15 are straight and parallel in the middle portion 16c of the SAW waveguide 16, but are tapered at the ends so that the SAW waveguide 16 widens at its front and back ends 16a and 16b. As in FIG. 1, the optical waveguide 18 is straight, and is disposed at an angle to the longitudinal axis of the SAW waveguide 16, passing near barrier 15 at the front end 16a and near barrier 14 at the back end 16b. A significant difference from FIG. 1 is that the widening of the front end 16a of the SAW waveguide 16 permits the transducer 12 to be placed so that it is not directly over the optical waveguide 18. This leads to a further improvement in sidelobe suppression, as will be explained in more detail later. In FIG. 9, the barriers 14 and 15 are both bent so that they are convex toward each other. The optical waveguide 18 parallels barrier 15. This configuration is generally similar to FIG. 6, except that the extra widening of the SAW waveguide 16 at the front end 16c again enables the transducer 12 to be placed so that it is not directly over the optical waveguide 18, thereby improving sidelobe suppression. In FIG. 10, a dummy waveguide 26 has been added to the structure in FIG. 9. The optical waveguide 18 and dummy waveguide 26 are disposed in mirror symmetry on either side of the longitudinal axis C-C of the SAW waveguide 16. The dummy waveguide 26 does not carry any signal information, but its presence makes the optical wavelength filter bilaterally symmetric, which further improves sidelobe suppression. Next, a first illustrative example not falling under the scope of the claims will be described with reference to FIGs. 11 to 15. Referring to FIG. 11, first illustrative example not falling under the scope of the claims also comprises an X-cut, Y-propagating LiNbO 3 substrate 10 three centimeters long, with a transducer 12, an optical waveguide 18, SAW absorbers 20 and 21, a polarizer 22, and an analyzer 24, as in the first embodiment. Although no SAW waveguide is provided in the first illustrative example not falling under the scope of the claims, the material properties of the LiNbO 3 substrate 10 cause the acoustic flux of the surface acoustic waves excited by the transducer 12 to propagate as a beam 28 at a 5° angle to the Y-axis of the substrate 10. The optical waveguide 18 is parallel to the Y-axis, so it cuts across the beam 28 at a 5° angle. The SAW amplitude in the acoustic beam 28 has a profile similar to that shown by curves I and II in FIGs. 2 and 3, falling off from a maximum value in the center of a cross-section of the beam 28 to substantially zero at the edges of the beam. FIG. 12 is a graph of the SAW amplitude at points over the optical waveguide 18 in FIG. 11. The horizontal axis indicates distance along the optical waveguide 18, while the SAW amplitude is indicated on the vertical axis. The SAW amplitude profile has the general shape of curve III, being substantially zero before the optical waveguide 18 enters the acoustic beam 28, beginning to rise smoothly where the optical waveguide 18 enters the acoustic beam 28, reaching a maximum value in the middle of the acoustic beam 28, then falling smoothly back to substantially zero where the optical waveguide 18 leaves the beam 28. The optical waveguide 18 does not pass under the transducer 12, and it moreover crosses the SAW absorbers 22 and 24 at points where acoustic flux is substantially absent. There are accordingly no abrupt changes in the SAW amplitude anywhere along the optical waveguide 18. The coupling coefficient, which is proportional to the square of the SAW amplitude, shows a similarly smooth profile. The absence of abrupt changes in the coupling coefficient improves the sidelobe suppression ratio. The reason for this will be explained with reference to FIGs. 13 to 15. FIG. 13 shows an ideal distribution of acoustic power along the light propagation path in the optical wavelength filter. The horizontal axis indicates distance from the center of the filter (marked zero). Acoustic power is indicated on the vertical axis. The ideal distribution, indicated by curve IV, has a certain half-power width w 1 . FIG. 14 shows the situation in a hypothetical optical wavelength filter in which the acoustic power is ideally distributed, except that the optical waveguide enters and leaves the interaction region at points where the acoustic power is not zero. The horizontal and vertical axes have the same meaning as in FIG. 13. The curve V of the acoustic power distribution along the light propagation path is a truncated version of the curve IV in FIG. 13, falling abruptly to zero where light enters and leaves the interaction region. FIG. 15 shows a window function of the interaction region. The horizontal axis has the same meaning as in FIG. 13; the vertical axis is a dimensionless quantity indicating the magnitude of the window function. Curve VI (the window function) has unit height over the interaction region and is zero elsewhere. The distance, measured along the light propagation path, between the two ends of the interaction region is w 2 . If z represents distance along the light propagation path, P(z) is the ideal acoustic power distribution shown in FIG. 13, and W(z) is the window function shown in FIG. 15, then the acoustic power distribution in FIG. 14 represents the product W(z)P(z). The wavelength transmission characteristic of an optical wavelength filter is obtained as the Fourier transform of the acoustic power distribution. For FIG. 14, the transmission characteristic T(λ) can be expressed as follows: T(λ) ∫W(z)P(z)exp(-iδz)dz In this equation δ = Δβ/2 - π/Λ, Δβ = 2π Δn/λ, Λ is the SAW wavelength, and Δ n is the birefringence index of the optical waveguide. If ^W(λ) is the Fourier transform of W(z) and ^P(λ) is the Fourier transform of P(z), the above equation implies that T(λ) is proportional to the convolution of ^W(λ) and ^P(λ): T(λ) ^W(λ)*^P(λ) The Fourier transform of a window function has intrinsic sidelobes. If the width w 2 of the window function W(z) is equal to the half-power width w 1 of the acoustic power distribution P(z), meaning that the ratio of peak acoustic power to the power at the edges of the interaction region is 2:1, these intrinsic sidelobes of ^W(λ) set a limit of about 9 dB on sidelobe suppression in the wavelength transmission characteristic T(λ). Filter designs that make the optical waveguide 18 pass directly under the center of the transducer 12 encounter a limit of this type. Moving the optical waveguide 18 out from under the transducer 12 has the effect of narrowing the half-power width w 1 in FIG. 13. This is equivalent to leaving w 1 constant and increasing the width w 2 of the window function W(z) in FIG. 15. If w 2 is widened, the Fourier transform ^W(λ) of W(z) becomes more like a delta function, permitting sidelobe suppression to be improved. If the ratio of peak acoustic power to power at the edges of the interaction region is 10:3.2, for example, then sidelobe suppression can be improved to about 15 dB. If the ratio is 10:1, sidelobe suppression can be improved to about 25 dB. This value indicates that satisfactory sidelobe suppression can be attained even if the actual SAW amplitude profile along the optical waveguide 18 does not fall completely to zero as in FIG. 12. As a variation of the first illustrative example, a SAW waveguide can be added to confine the acoustic beam 28 to a well-defined path, thereby obtaining a larger coupling coefficient at the center of the beam 28. The resulting device configuration is the same as in FIG. 8. The concept of locating the transducer and optical waveguide away from one another, to avoid abrupt changes in the coupling coefficient below the transducer 12, can also be applied to optical wavelength filters with curved transducers. This will be presented as a second illustrative example not falling under the scope of the claims. Referring to FIG. 16, the second illustrative example not falling under the scope of the claims has a pair of curved interdigital transducers 30 and 31, each having the form of a circular arc and both having the same radius of curvature. The optical waveguide 18 passes between these two transducers 30 and 31, so that it is disposed below neither of them. The polarizer 22, analyzer 24, and SAW absorbers 20 and 21 are as in the first embodiment in FIG. 1. The surface acoustic waves excited by transducer 30 are focused in a beam 32 toward the middle of the optical waveguide 18. The surface acoustic waves excited by transducer 31 are focused in a beam 33 toward the same point. The optical waveguide 18 crosses both beams 32 and 33 in the vicinity of their point of intersection. The second illustrative example not falling under the scope of the claims operates in essentially the same way as the first illustrative example. The focusing of the acoustic beams can improve the weighting of the coupling coefficient, e.g. by creating a higher peak value at the middle of the optical waveguide 18. The curvature of the transducers can be adjusted to achieve the desired weighting function. The bilateral symmetry of the acoustic beam 32 and 33 in the third embodiment leads to improved sidelobe suppression. As a variation of the second illustrative example, one of the two transducers 30 and 31 can be omitted, so that the optical waveguide 18 crosses only one focused beam, from one side of the beam to the other. As another variation of the second illustrative example, the two transducers 30 and 31 can be straight, like the transducer 12 in FIG. 11. Each transducer actually produces two beams, which propagate at angles of +5° and -5° to the Y-axis, so that there are four beams in all. Two of these beams cross the optical waveguide 18; the other two beams are not used. FIGs. 1 to 10 are drawn schematically, for the purpose of showing in a readily understandable way how the invention works. The invention is not restricted to the exact sizes, shapes, or positional relationships of the elements shown in these drawings, or to the materials mentioned in the description. The polarizer 22 and analyzer 24 need not be integral with the substrate 10. The invention can moreover employ SAW waveguides of various types other than the diffused type shown in FIGs. 1 to 3. Mode conversion is not restricted to TE-to-TM conversion. The opposite type of conversion, from TM mode to TE mode, can be employed, for example. Those skilled in the art will recognize that further modifications can also be made without departing from the scope claimed below.

Claims: An optical wavelength filter, comprising: a polarizer (22); an analyzer (24); a substrate (10) capable of displaying an acousto-optic effect; a transducer (12) formed on said substrate (10), for exciting a surface acoustic wave (SAW); first and second longitudinal SAW confinement barriers (14, 15) formed in said substrate (10) defining the boundaries of a SAW waveguide (16), said SAW waveguide (16) having a first end (16a) disposed near said transducer (12), a second end (16b), and a middle portion (16c) disposed between said first end (16a) and said second end (16b), for guiding said surface acoustic wave from said first end (16a) to said second end (16b); and an optical waveguide (18) formed in said substrate (10), for guiding light from said polarizer (22) through said SAW waveguide (16) to said analyzer (24), characterised in that said optical waveguide (18) is disposed nearer to the first barrier than to the second barrier at said first end (16a), disposed substantially centrally between said barriers (14, 15) in said middle portion (16c) of said SAW waveguide (16), and disposed nearer to the second barrier than the first barrier at said second end (16b), whereby to provide a weighting of the acousto-optic coupling coefficient such that the acousto-optic coupling coefficient varies along the length of the optical waveguide. An optical wavelength according to claim 1, wherein: said barriers (14, 15) are straight and mutually parallel; and said optical waveguide (18) is straight and passes through said SAW waveguide (16) at a non-zero angle to said barriers (14, 15). An optical wavelength filter according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said optical waveguide (18) does not pass under said transducer (12). An optical wavelength filter according to claim 3, wherein said SAW waveguide (16) is straight in said middle portion (16c) but widens at said first end (16a) and said second end (16b); and said optical waveguide (18) is straight and passes through the middle portion (16c) of said SAW waveguide (16) at a non-zero angle to said barriers (14, 15). An optical wavelength filter, comprising: a polarizer (22); an analyzer (24); a substrate (10) capable of displaying an acousto-optic effect; a transducer (12) formed on said substrate (10), for exciting a surface acoustic wave (SAW); first and second longitudinal SAW confinement barriers (14, 15) formed in said substrate (10) defining the boundaries of a SAW waveguide (16), said SAW waveguide (16) having a first end (16a) disposed near said transducer (12), a second end (16b), and a middle portion (16c) disposed between said first end (16a) and said second end (16b), for guiding said surface acoustic wave from said first end (16a) to said second end (16b); and an optical waveguide (18) formed in said substrate (10), for guiding light from said polarizer (22) through said SAW waveguide (16) to said analyzer (24), characterised in that said optical waveguide (18) is disposed nearer to the first barrier (14, 15) than to the second barrier at said first and second ends (16a, 16b) and disposed substantially centrally between said barriers (14, 15) in said middle portion (16c) of said SAW waveguide (16), whereby to provide a weighting of the acousto-optic coupling coefficient such that the acousto-optic coupling coefficient varies along the length of the optical waveguide. An optical wavelength filter according to claim 5, wherein: said barriers (14, 15) are bent and mutually parallel; and said optical waveguide (18) is straight. An optical wavelength filter according to claim 5, wherein: said barriers (14, 15) are straight and mutually parallel; and said optical waveguide (18) is bent. An optical wavelength filter according to claim 5, wherein: one of said barriers (14) is straight and another one of said barriers (15) is bent; and said optical waveguide (18) parallels one of said barriers (14, 15). An optical wavelength filter according to claim 8, wherein said optical waveguide (18) parallels the one of said barriers (15) that is bent. An optical wavelength filter according to claim 9, wherein the one of said barriers (15) that is bent is bent in a V-shape. An optical wavelength filter according to claim 9, wherein the one of said barriers (15) that is bent is curved. An optical wavelength filter according to claim 5, wherein said optical waveguide (18) does not pass under said transducer (12). An optical wavelength filter according to claim 12, wherein: said SAW waveguide (16) has a longitudinal axis disposed between said barriers (14, 15) and is bilaterally symmetrical about said longitudinal axis; said barriers (14, 15) are bent; and said optical waveguide (18) parallels one of said barriers (15). An optical wavelength filter according to claim 13, also comprising a dummy waveguide (26) paralleling another one of said barriers (14), said optical waveguide (18) and said dummy waveguide (26) being symmetrical to one another about said longitudinal axis.

Inventors: KOBAYASHI MASAO, OKAYAMA HIDEAKI, KOBAYASHI, MASAO, OKAYAMA, HIDEAKI, Kobayashi, Masao, c/o Oki Elec.Ind.Co.,Ltd., Okayama, Hideaki, c/o Oki Elec.Ind.Co.,Ltd.
Applicants: OKI ELECTRIC IND CO LTD, OKI ELECTRIC INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
Application year: 1995
Main classification: G02F1
IPC codes: G02F1