Text preparing system using knowledge base and method therefor

Abstract: System and method for preparing a text by using a knowledge base, by which knowledge relating to input information is first retrieved from the knowledge base. Then, a plurality of kinds of information used as elements of a text to be generated is selected from the input information and the retrieved information relating thereto. Subsequently, a describing order, in which the selected elements of the text are described, is determined. Then, a text to be outputted is generated on the basis of the selected elements of the text, the describing order of which has been determined. Thereby, a text, whose contents and structure meet a user's purpose, is generated from the input simple information.

Description: The present invention relates to a text preparing system for preparing a text according to input information and further relates to a method therefor. Hitherto, there has been devised a conventional text preparing system for reading a text from a memory or preparing and outputting a text according to input predetermined commands and data. The conventional text preparing system, however, has been adapted to output a uniform text correspondingly to the input predetermined commands and data. Therefore, the conventional text preparing system can not output a text whose contents and structure meet requirements for each text, which are set according to a reader's understanding, the difference in social position or rank between the reader and the author of the text, the type of the text and so on. It is known from US-A-5282265 to provide a text preparing system responsive to input information in natural language form to generate text based on retrieved information and text preparation rules stored in a knowledge base. The text preparation rule defines the contents of the text and the order of the contents. The intention of the user is understood from the input information using a goal-plan model stored in the knowledge base. Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide an improved text preparing system and method. Aspects of the present invention are set out in the appended claims. Other features, objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment with reference to the drawings in which like reference characters designate like or corresponding parts throughout several views. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a block diagram for illustrating the configuration of the hardware of a natural language processor embodying the present invention, namely, the embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram for illustrating the fundamental configuration of the natural language processor embodying the present invention; FIG. 3 is a functional diagram for illustrating the detailed configuration of the natural language processor embodying the present invention; FIG. 4 is a diagram for illustrating the configuration of a conceptual analyzer (hereunder abbreviated as CA); FIG. 5 is a flowchart for illustrating a processing performed in a pre-CA; FIG. 6 is a flowchart for illustrating a processing performed in a main CA; FIG. 7 is a flowchart for illustrating a processing performed in a post-CA; FIGS. 8(a), 8(b) and 8(c) are diagrams for illustrating objects to be processed by the post-CA and results of the processing performed in the post-CA; FIG. 9 is a block diagram for illustrating the detailed configuration of an understander; FIG. 10 is a flowchart for illustrating the details of a processing performed in a pre-understander; FIG. 11 is a flowchart for illustrating the details of a processing performed in a main understander; FIG. 12 is a flowchart for illustrating the details of a processing performed in a post-understander; FIG. 13 is a diagram for illustrating the detailed structure of a text preparator; FIG. 14 is a flowchart for illustrating a procedure performed in an introductory-part preparator; FIG. 15 is a flowchart for illustrating a procedure performed in a main-part preparator; FIG. 16 is a flowchart for illustrating a procedure performed in a closing-part preparator; FIG. 17 is a diagram for illustrating the detailed configuration of a generator; FIG. 18 is a flowchart for illustrating a procedure performed in a pre-processor; FIG. 19 is a flowchart for illustrating a procedure performed in a sentence generator; FIG. 20 is a flowchart for illustrating a procedure performed in a post-processor; FIG. 21 is a diagram for illustrating the structure of a knowledge base; FIG. 22 is a diagram for illustrating primary types of knowledge provided in a physical world knowledge base (hereunder abbreviated as WKB); FIG. 23 is a diagram for illustrating primary types of knowledge structures which are present in the class "Physical Object"; FIG. 24 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the class "Person" and examples thereof; FIG. 25 is a diagram for illustrating primary types of knowledge structures which are provided under in the class "Abstract Entities"; FIG. 26 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the class "Organization" and examples thereof; FIG. 27 is a diagram for illustrating primary types of knowledge structures which are provided under the class "Space"; FIG. 28 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the class "Place" and examples thereof; FIG. 29 is a diagram for illustrating primary types of knowledge structures which are present in the class "Time"; FIG. 30 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the classes "Unit_Time" and "Time" and examples thereof; FIG. 31 is a diagram for illustrating primary types of knowledge structures which are present in the class "Driving Forces"; FIG. 32 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the class "Goal-Plan" and examples thereof; FIG. 33 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the class "MOPS" and examples thereof; FIG. 34 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the class "Scene" and examples thereof; FIG. 35 is a diagram for illustrating the structures of generalized goal and plan; FIG. 36 is a diagram for illustrating examples of the scenes which depend on domains; FIG. 37 is a diagram for illustrating examples of fundamental goals and their plans which do not depend on generalized domains; FIG. 38 is a diagram for illustrating primary types of goals, plans, MOPS and SCENES used in the case of preparing a letter; FIG. 39 is a diagram for illustrating a part of the class "Results of Driving Forces or Action Descriptors (hereunder abbreviated as AD)"; FIG. 40 is a diagram for illustrating the structure of CD and examples thereof; FIG. 41 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the class "AD" and an example thereof; FIGS. 42(a) and 42(b) are diagrams for illustrating an example of a Text preparation Knowledge Base (hereunder abbreviated as TKB); FIG. 43 is a diagram for illustrating the detailed rules of the TKB for preparing an introductory-part of a letter; FIG. 44 is a diagram for illustrating the detailed rules of the TKB for the description of the main goal of the letter, which is performed by the introductory-part preparator, and the processing to be performed by the main-part preparator; FIG. 45 is a diagram for illustrating the detailed rules of the TKB, which are used for preparing the letter in the closing-part preparator; FIG. 46 is a diagram for illustrating an example of a Language Knowledge Base (hereunder abbreviated as LKB); FIG. 47 is a flowchart for illustrating the detailed procedure involved in 'SET-SCENE' in the case of preparing the letter; FIG. 48 is a diagram for illustrating an example of a processing to be performed by the CA in the case of preparing the letter; FIG. 49 is a diagram for illustrating an example of an SDB (Structured Data Base); FIG. 50 is a flowchart for illustrating a confirmation processing; FIG. 51 is a diagram for illustrating an example of an inference or reasoning process; FIGS. 52(a) and 52(b) are diagrams for illustrating an example of another inference process; FIG. 53 is a diagram for illustrating an example of a chaining inference; FIG. 54 is a diagram for illustrating an example of a task network; FIG. 55 is a diagram for illustrating the example of the task network after a simulation has been performed; FIG. 56 is a diagram for illustrating an example of an output letter; FIG. 57 is a diagram for illustrating another example of a processing to be performed by the CA in the case of preparing a letter; FIG. 58 is a diagram for illustrating a process of preparing a letter; FIG. 59 is a diagram for illustrating an example of a chaining inference; FIG. 60 is a diagram for illustrating an example of a task network; FIG. 61 is a diagram for illustrating an example of an incomplete task network; FIG. 62 is a diagram for illustrating another example of an output letter; FIG. 63 is a diagram for illustrating still another example of a processing performed by the CA in the case of preparing a letter; FIG. 64 is a diagram for illustrating a process of preparing a letter; FIG. 65 is a diagram for illustrating still another example of an output letter; FIG. 66 is a diagram for illustrating yet another example of a processing performed in the case of preparing a letter; FIG. 67 is a diagram for illustrating a process of reconstructing the received letter; FIG. 68 is a diagram for illustrating yet another output letter; FIG. 69 is a diagram for illustrating an example of a text preparation rule for a user manual of word processor; FIG. 70 is a diagram for illustrating an example of a Goals-Plans structure of a command; and FIG. 71 is a diagram for illustrating an example of a response made by using a help facility. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Hereinafter, the preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail by referring to the accompanying drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram for illustrating the configuration of the hardware of a text preparing system embodying the present invention, namely, an embodiment of the present invention. This text preparing system is provided with an input unit 1, a CPU (namely, Central Processing Unit) 2, an output unit 3, a program memory 4, a data memory 5 and a bus 6. The input unit 1 is used to input information represented in a natural language, and, for example, a keyboard for keying characters may be employed as the input unit 1. The input unit 1 is, however, not limited to such a keyboard. Speech or voice input unit including a speech recognition device, an image input unit including a character recognition device, or a receiver for receiving information from another system may be employed as the input unit 1. Alternatively, two or more of these units may be simultaneously employed as the input unit, and one of the employed units may be selected in such a manner as to actually be used as the input unit. Further, information generated by performing an operation within this system may also be used as input information thereto. The CPU 2 is operative to perform operations for various processing and make a logical decision or the like. Further, the CPU 2 controls each of the composing elements connected to the bus 6. The output unit 3 is, for instance, a display device such as a CRT (namely, Cathode Ray Tube) display and a liquid crystal display. In addition, a speech or audio output unit for outputting output information synthesized by performing a speech synthesis, a printer for providing printouts, or a transmitter for transmitting information to other systems may be employed as the output unit 3. Alternatively, two or more of these units may be simultaneously employed as the output unit, and one of the employed units may be selected in such a manner as to actually be used as the output unit. Further, an output of the output unit 3 may be used as input information to another unit of this system. The program memory 4 is a memory which stores programs to be executed by the CPU 2 so as to perform a control operation including a procedure (to be described later by referring to a flowchart thereof) therein. Either of a ROM (namely, Read-Only Memory) and a RAM (namely, Random Access Memory), to which a program is loaded from an external memory unit or the like, may be employed as the program memory 4. The data memory 5 stores knowledge contained in a knowledge base (to be described later) in addition to data generated when performing various processings. The data memory is, for example, a RAM. The knowledge contained in the knowledge base is preliminarily loaded from a nonvolatile external storage medium into the data memory 5. Alternatively, the knowledge contained in the knowledge base is referred to, if necessary. The bus 6 is a bus for transferring an address signal indicating a composing element to be controlled by the CPU 2, a control signal used for controlling each composing element and data to be exchanged between the composing elements. FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram for illustrating the fundamental configuration of the text preparing system embodying the present invention. This text preparing system is provided with the input unit 1, the output unit 3, a comprehender 21, a document composer 22, a knowledge base 23 and a knowledge base manager 24. The comprehender 21 is provided with a CA 31 and an understander 32 (to be described later) and comprehends the contents of natural language information inputted from the input unit 1 by utilizing the knowledge contained in the knowledge base 23. The document composer 22 contains a text preparator 33 and a generator 34 (to be described later) and prepares a document on the basis of the contents of the information comprehended by the comprehender 21 by utilizing the knowledge base 23. Then, the composer 22 outputs the prepared document to the output unit 3. The knowledge base 23 provides necessary knowledge to the comprehender 21 and the document composer 22 through the knowledge base manager 24. Moreover, the knowledge base 23 stores new knowledge, which is generated during a process performed in the comprehender 21 and/or in the document composer 22, therein. The knowledge base manager 24 controls the reading of knowledge from the knowledge base 23 and the writing of knowledge to the knowledge base 23. FIG. 3 is a functional diagram for illustrating the further detailed configuration of the system embodying the present invention. The conceptual analyzer (CA) 31 analyzes natural language information inputted by a user and converts this information to action descriptor (AD) which represents the meaning of this information. Instead of first performing a syntax analysis on the inputted natural language and then giving meaning to the analyzed structure of a statement, the CA 31 obtains a semantic concept equivalent to the input information thereto and performs a processing on the basis of the obtained semantic concept. Further, the CA 31 performs a processing by predicting subsequent information from preceding information contextually, semantically and grammatically. The understander 32 confirms the validity of the concept outputted from the CA 31 and complements the concept by, for instance, adding information if necessary. Further, the understander 32 infers a user's intention, which are behind his actions, by utilizing the "GOAL-PLAN" model of the domain knowledge base. Moreover, the understander 32 adds details of a part of the plan, to which no reference seems to be made by the user, by performing simulation and interactive processing. The text preparator 33 forms a text in AD form, by selecting the relevant parts of the "GOAL-PLAN" of the user. The text preparator 33 prepares a complete text in the AD form on the basis of text composing rules which include those for the layout of a document. For example, in the case of preparing a letter, the text preparator has rules for preparation of a letter, which are based on the relation between the sender and the addressee of the letter. The generator 34 generates a natural language text from the text in the AD form generated by the text preparator 33. In the generator, a text is generated in a tone suited for the requests and style of the user and the type of the document. For example, in the case of preparing a letter, a text to be written in the letter is generated depending on the factors such as the style of the sender, the degree of familiarity between the sender and the addressee and the difference in social rank therebetween. The knowledge base 23 has mainly four knowledge sub-bases, namely, a WKB 37, a DKB 38, a TKB 39 and an LKB 40. The WKB 37 has knowledge of general matters. The DKB 38 has knowledge of the "GOAL-PLAN" or the like. The TKB 39 has the knowledge for composing a text, for instance, the aforementioned text composing rules. The LKB 40 has knowledge of language, which is equivalent to an ordinary dictionary, and is used in common for the analysis of a natural language performed by the CA 31 and for generating a natural language by the generator 34. A feedback processor 35 receives an input from the user relating to various factors, which the user wishes to change or re-examine in output results and performs a feedback processing. Such factors are, for instance, the selection of another replaceable word or phrase (namely, a synonym or phrase having the same meaning), the conjugation of a verb (an infinitive, a gerund and so forth), the voice of a verb used in a sentence (namely, an active voice or a passive voice), the tone of a document, the levels or degrees of style and politeness, the representation of a concept, the rules for preparing a document, and the addition and deletion of a phrase and a sentence. The document formatter 36 formats an outputted final natural-language sentence in accordance with the format of a document having an appropriate layout after such a sentence is generated. For instance, in the case of preparing a letter, the document formatter makes decisions about the format of the letter, such as a selection of American style (namely, a full-block style) or British style, an output on a letterhead, an addition of a date and the paragraphing of a text. FIG. 4 is a block diagram for illustrating the detailed configuration of the CA 31. Conceptual analysis is a mapping from a natural language to a semantic representation. The role of the conceptual analysis is to convert a natural-language sentence or of pieces thereof into a knowledge structure. This conversion from a word or a group of words to a knowledge structure is performed by finding a morphological, syntactic, semantic or contextual clue. In the CA 31, when processing an input thereto, the emphasis is put on the meaning thereof instead of generating the construction of a sentence by parsing the sentence. Thereby, even a grammatically erroneous statement and an incomplete sentence such as a piece of a statement can be handled. In the process of processing each word, the CA 31 predicts the subsequent word so as to make good use thereof in the subsequent process. In the case of employing a conceptual analysis approach, a dictionary of the meaning of words plays a central role in the processing. Therefore, the CA 31 does not utilize definite grammar. The CA 31, however, can-not-dispense with utilization of constructive characteristics. Thus the CA 31 uses a noun group constituency when a term having a meaning is formed by a plurality of words. FIG. 4 is a diagram for illustrating the detailed configuration of the CA 31. Further, a pre-CA 42 is operative to perform a pre-processing which will be described later by referring to FIG. 5. Moreover, a main CA 43 is operative to perform a main processing (to be described later by referring to FIG. 6) on each of inputted words. Furthermore, a post-CA 44 is operative to perform a post-processing which will be described later by referring to FIG. 7. FIG. 5 is a flowchart for illustrating the pre-processing to be performed in the pre-CA 42. In step S101, the pre-CA 42 performs the pre-processing, namely, the pre-CA 42 contextually, from the preceding information predicts information, which should or may be next inputted. FIG. 6 is a flowchart for illustrating the main processing to be performed in the main CA 43. First, in step S109, a leading unprocessed word is fetched in order to process words sequentially from the first word. Next, in step S110, the main-CA 43 searches the LKB 39 for the same word. If the word is found, a program for performing this process advances to step S114. In contrast, if not, the program advances to step S111 whereupon a word corrector (not shown) checks the spellings of words and corrects misspellings made by a user. Then, the main CA searches the LKB 39 containing the corrected words, again. In the case where the same word is not found in the LKB 39 again, or in the case where the main CA finds no misspelled words in the LKB 39, the program advances to step S113. In this step S113, the main CA searches the WKB 37 for the same word. If the same word is found therein, the program advances to step S114. If not, the program advances to step S115. In step S114, a corresponding draft instance is created from rules corresponding to the given word. Further, the subsequent word is predicted. Then, the program advances to step S116. On the other hand, in step S115, an "unknown concept" is created because of the fact that the input word was not present in the knowledge base. Then, the program advances to step S116. In step S116, it is checked whether or not the previously created concepts can be attached to the currently created concept. If so, the previously created concept is attached to the currently created concept in step S117. If none of the previously created concepts can be attached to the current concept, the program advances to step S118. In step S118, it is checked whether the current concept can be attached to any of the previously created concepts. If so, the current concept is attached to the appropriate previous concept in step S119. Subsequently, in step S120, it is checked whether any un-processed word remains in the input. If all words have been processed, this processing is finished. If there is an un-processed word remaining, the program returns to step S109. The same process consisting of steps S110 to S119 is performed on the next word. Thus, when all words are processed, the system goes on to the post-processing to be performed by the post-CA 44. FIG. 7 is a flowchart for illustrating the processing to be performed in the post-CA. FIGS. 8(a), 8(b) and 8(c) are diagrams for illustrating objects to be processed by the post-CA and results of the processing performed in the post-CA. First, in step S121, a beautification concept is identified. For example, in the case where an input sentence is "I would like to meet you", result of the processing by the main CA is as given in FIG. 8(a). In this case, in.step S121, the outer AD "WANT" is identified as a beautification concept. Next, in step S122, associated statements are connected with each other. For instance, in the case where the statements (1) and (2) of FIG. 8(b) are inputted, the main processing performed in step S110 results in the two AD's given in FIG. 8(b). In this example, the first AD ("PTRANS") indicates the reason for the second AD ("WANT (MEET)"), so that these two AD's are connected with each other as illustrated in this figure, as a result of processing at step S122. In step S123, unreasonably connected AD's are separated from each other. For example, in the case-where an input expression is "reserve accommodation and pick up", result of the main processing performed in step S110 comes to be as illustrated in FIG. 8(c). In this case, the concept "MEET" (corresponding to "pick up") is connected to a slot in such a manner as to have AND-relation thereto. In such a case, at step S123, the result is divided into two AD's. FIG. 9 is a block diagram for illustrating the detailed configuration of the understander. A pre-understander 91 of FIG. 9 is operative to perform a pre-processing which will be described later by referring to FIG. 10. A main understander 92 is operative to perform a main processing (to be described later by referring to FIG. 11). Furthermore, a post-understander 93 is operative to perform a post-processing which will be described later by referring to FIG. 12. FIG. 10 is a flowchart for illustrating the details of the processing to be performed in the pre-understander 91. Most of CAs can not analyze natural-language inputs without leaving some ambiguous input unresolved. Thus, it is necessary to eliminate the ambiguity and to verify the validity of the concept before the main understander 91 performs the processing. Therefore, after the CA 31 analyzes the input, the list of the concepts obtained as the result of its analysis is sent to the pre-understander 91. As shown in FIG. 10, first, in step S201, the pre-understander processes an unknown concept created to represent a word new to the system. Hereupon, if the unknown concept can not be converted to a known concept from input information, the system requests the user to input supplemental information. Next, in step S202, isolated concepts are processed. Further, in step S203, ambiguous expressions are eliminated. Then, in step S204, the pre-understander 91 confirms the validity of a draft instance and updates and complements the draft instance according to the knowledge base 23. In addition to this, the pre-understander 91 confirms/corrects the date, using models of possible user errors (for instance, in the beginning of a year, many people tend to continue using the previous year) as well as confirms/corrects the tense of a sentence on the basis of the general knowledge contained in the WKB 37. Next, in step S205, the incomplete concepts are completed by using the WKB 37 and the DKB 38. FIG. 11 is a flowchart for illustrating the details of the processing to be performed in the main understander 92 which attempts to infer the user's intentions, which are behind his actions, by utilizing the predetermined GOAL-PLAN model of the user. As shown in FIG. 11, a scene is set in step S211. Namely, an actor (that is, a person who is a subject or an object of an action) contained in the input information is first detected. Further, a theme corresponding to the actor and other general contexts are searched for. For example, in the case of preparing a letter, this processing includes the identification of the sender and the addressee, the establishment of the relation therebetween and their previous context. The details of the preparation of a letter will be described later. Next, in step S212, the goal is detected. Hereupon, the AD obtained by the pre-understander 91 is processed in order to determine a main plan and a main goal. For instance, in the case of preparing the letter, if only the concept "MEET" is given in the input, the system infers from the coincidence in the field of occupation between the sender and the addressee that the reason for the sender to meet the addressee is that they discuss with each other. This result of the inference is presented to the user. The user may approve this, alternatively, he may input another reason (namely, a reason which the user may have forgot to input) hereat. A concept inputted from the pre-understander 91 is an internal representation. Thus, the identification of the user's intention, becomes a primary task performed by the main understander 92. If the implied intention is found, further inferring is performed in step S213. Hereat, the "GOAL-PLAN" inference required to infer the meaning, behind the actions, and to connect various inputs with one another is performed. During the understander's processing, a task network is formed for the purpose of facilitating handling and processing of the knowledge structures. In step S214, a planning for understanding is performed. Even after the inference is carried out in step S213, a part of the input information may remain inexplicable. In such a case, planning is done from the topmost level goal to the input level goal in order to connect the remaining information until all of the input information becomes explicable. Thereby, the understanding process is completed. FIG. 12 is a flowchart for illustrating the details of the processing to be performed in the post-understander 93. In step S221, the post-processing, namely, the process of making plans for completion and execution is performed. That is, complete simulations corresponding to all scenarios are performed in order to detect preconditions, which should be fulfilled, and other goals. A user is informed of such goals and thus, necessary actions are taken. FIG. 13 is a diagram for illustrating the detailed structure of the text preparator 33. In this figure, reference numeral 131 designates a introductory-part preparator; 132 a main-part preparator; and 133 a closing-part preparator. The text preparator 33 has access to rules for putting together information in order and preparing output texts. Such rules (described in TKB) include general rules for preparing a document and specific rules for creating text depending on the particular context, the user and other such factors. Upon completion of the processing of the understander 32, the document preparator 33 scans the network of the user's goal-plan so as to extract the main goal and plan to be described in the output document. Further, the text preparator 33 puts the contents of the output document in order. Here, note that an output statement of the text preparator 33 is presented in the internal representation form, namely, the AD form and thus, is not a natural language statement. Further, the text preparator has access to rules, which vary with the type of the document and the context conditions and the specific rules which also depend on user-specific factors For example, in the case of preparing a letter, the familiarity between the sender and the addressee of the letter (namely, whether or not they have known each other, or whether or not they are close to each other), the difference in social rank therebetween, the frequency of exchange of letters therebetween and the contents of the latest correspondence therebetween can be cited as factors which affect the operation of preparing the letter. FIG. 14 is a flowchart for illustrating the procedure to be performed in an introductory-part preparator 131. First, in step S301, the introductory part of a document is prepared. The introductory part depends not only on the type of the document but on the background thereof and previously prepared relevant documents. To take the case of preparing a letter, the text of the introductory part of the letter depends largely upon whether the letter is a reply to the addressee, or whether the letter is a first letter to the addressee. Next, in step S302, the main goal, namely, the purpose of the letter is stated. FIG. 15 is a flowchart for illustrating the procedure to be performed in the main-part preparator 302. First, in step S311, the main plan is stated. Subsequently, in step S312, the precondition for the main plan is described. Further, in step S313, another operation to be performed (namely, a sub-goal) is described. Next, in step S314, another part of the main plan is described. In the case of preparing a letter, the main plan, the sub-goal, the sender's request and so forth are described as primary parts of the letter. FIG. 16 is a flowchart for illustrating the procedure to be performed in a closing-part preparator 303. Namely, in step S321, the closing-statement is described and further, the closing-remark is added thereto. In the case of preparing a letter, the closing remark is added thereto by the text preparator on the basis of the relation between the sender and the addressee thereof. FIG. 17 is a diagram for illustrating the detailed configuration of the generator 34. As shown in this figure, the generator 34 consists of three portions, namely, a preprocessor 400, a statement generator 410 and a post-processor. The generating process to be performed by the generator 34 is equivalent to the inverse process of the analysis. A generating operation is mapping from a knowledge structure to a sequence of natural language statements. The preprocessor 400 performs a pre-processing on the list of AD's outputted from the text preparator. Then, the processed list is sent from the preprocessor to the statement generator 410, whereupon a conversion from a concept to a natural language is performed. FIG. 18 is a flowchart for illustrating the procedure to be performed in the pre-processor 400. One of primary features of the pre-processor 400 is an addition of a beautification concept, which is performed in step S401. Further, another feature of the pre-processor 400 is a decision of the expression form (for example, a suggestive tone, an interrogative tone) of a request or an inquiry, which is performed in step S402. For instance, in a letter preparing system, the expression form is determined depending on the difference in social rank between a sender and an addressee of a letter, and whether or not they have known each other, and so on. The pre-processor 400 has rules for connecting a plurality of AD's with one another in step S403. Further, the input AD is converted into a linguistic AD having additional linguistic information such as a role, a gender and a case. Further, to generate a pronoun, the number of referring thereto is registered. Moreover, special linguistic structures such as a parallelism and a causality are generated by using the slot to which the AD is connected. The sentence generator 410 is operative to prepare a list called "GLIST" which carries all concepts to be represented. Further, the sentence generator 410 puts the AD's, which are received from the pre-processor 400, serially in the GLIST in order to convert the AD's into the natural language. Moreover, the sentence generator 410 has "demons" corresponding to grammatical representations such as those of the possessive case and the infinitive case. The demons intervene in the ordinary flow of the process to be performed by the generator. Then, the demons instruct the generator to further modify the representation of the concept. FIG. 19 is a flowchart for illustrating the procedure to be performed in the sentence generator 410. First, in step S411, all of the concepts are put in the GLIST. Then, it is checked in step S412 whether or not the GLIST is empty. If empty, the processing of the GLIST is terminated. If not empty, a program for performing this process advances to step S413 whereupon it is examined whether or not a leading element of the GLIST is a word. In the case where the leading element is a word, this word is picked out of the GLIST and is added to the statement. Subsequently, the program returns to step S412. Thereafter, the subsequent information is processed. If it is found in step S413 that the leading element is not a word, it is further checked in step S415 whether or not the demon has modified the concept of the leading element of the GLIST. If modified, the program returns to step S412 whereupon the concept is processed. If not, the program advances to step S416 whereupon the concept of the GLIST is converted to a word by referring to the LKB. Then, in step S417, the remaining sub-concept is put in the GLIST. FIG. 20 is a flowchart for illustrating the procedure to be performed in the post-processor 420. The post-processor 420 performs post-edit operations such as the capitalization of the leading character of the sentence and punctuation after the sentence generator 410 generates a natural language output sentence. The post-generator 420 checks the consistency of the text, which is generated by using an intra-system feedback on the basis of the given input and the system's understanding, in step S422 as another primary function thereof. Thus, a consistent result is outputted to the feedback processor 35. Next, the structure of the knowledge data base utilized in the aforementioned processing will be described hereinbelow. The structure of the knowledge base 23 used in this embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 21. As described above, the knowledge base 23 consists of four sub-knowledge bases, namely, the WKB 37, the DKB 38, the TKB 39 and the LKB 40. FIG. 22 is a diagram for illustrating primary types (of classes) of knowledge provided in the WKB 37. As illustrated in this figure, the types "Physical Objects", "Abstract Entities", "Space (place)", "Time (Events)", "Driving Forces", "Results of Driving Forces or Actions", and "State Descriptors" are employed as the primary types. FIG. 23 is a diagram for illustrating the primary types of knowledge structures which are present in the "Physical Object". FIG. 24 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the class "Person" and examples thereof. FIG. 25 is a diagram for illustrating the primary types of knowledge structures which are provided under the "Abstract Entities". FIG. 26 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the "Organization" and examples thereof. FIG. 27 is a diagram for illustrating the primary types of knowledge structures which are provided under the "Space". FIG. 28 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the "Place" and examples thereof. FIG. 29 is a diagram for illustrating the primary types of knowledge structures which are present in the class "Time". FIG. 30 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the "Unit_Time" and the "Time" and examples thereof. FIG. 31 is a diagram for illustrating the primary types of knowledge structures which are present in the "Driving Forces". FIG. 32 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the "Goal-Plan" and examples thereof. FIG. 33 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the "MOPS" and examples thereof. FIG. 34 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the "Scene" and examples thereof. FIG. 35 is a diagram for illustrating the structures of generalized goals and plans. FIG. 36 is a diagram for illustrating examples of the scenes which depend on domains. FIG. 37 is a diagram for illustrating examples of fundamental goals and their plans which do not depend on generalized domains. As shown in this figure, in the case of "DKNOW", general plans are "READ" and "ASK". In contrast, in the case where the domain is "DO-RESEARCH (doing research environment)", "ABSORB (for instance, attend conference)" is added thereto at the same level as of the "READ" and the "ASK". FIG. 38 is a diagram for illustrating the primary types of goals, plans, "MOPS" and "SCENES" used in the case of preparing a letter. FIG. 39 is a diagram for illustrating a part of the "Results of Driving Forces or Actions Descriptors". FIG. 40 is a diagram fcr illustrating the structure of AD and examples thereof. FIG. 41 is a diagram for illustrating slots of the knowledge structure of the class "AD" and an example thereof. FIGS. 42(a) and 42(b) are diagrams for illustrating an example of a TKB. FIGS. 43 to 45 illustrate detailed rules of the TKB, which are used for preparing a letter. FIG. 43 is a diagram for illustrating the detailed rules of the TKB for preparing an introductory-part of a letter in step S301 of FIG. 14 by means of the introductory-part preparator 131. FIG. 44 is a diagram for illustrating the detailed rules of the TKB for the description of the main goal of the letter, which is performed in step S302 of FIG. 14 by means of the introductory-part preparator 131, and the processing to be performed in steps S311 to S314 of FIG. 15 by the main-part preparator 132. FIG. 45 is a diagram for illustrating the detailed rules of the TKB, which are used for preparing the letter in steps S321 to 322 of FIG. 16 by means of the closing-part preparator 133. FIG. 46 is a diagram for illustrating an example of the LKB. FIG. 47 is a flowchart for illustrating the detailed procedure involved in "SET-SCENE" in step S211 of FIG. 11 performed by the Main-Understander 92 in the case of preparing the letter. First, in step S501, a sender and an addressee of the letter, which are contained in the input information, are detected. Next, in step S502, the establishment of the relation between both of the sender and the addressee is attempted. To that end, the data base and the input information are searched for existence of any previous open-context between the sender and the addressee. If such correspondences therebetween are not found, this input information is assumed to be a first letter and a program for performing this process advances to step S510. In contrast, if such correspondences therebetween are detected, the program advances to step S503 whereupon it is judged which of the two, the sender or the addressee is now expected to respond. If the addressee is expected to do so, previous letters are retrieved from the data base in step S504. Then, it is judged in step S505 whether or not a letter of the addressee can be inferred. If not, input information is obtained from a user in step S506. Subsequently, the program returns to step S505. If the letter of the addressee can be inferred, the program advances to step S510. In contrast, in the case where the sender is expected to respond, if previous letters are found in step S507, such letters are retrieved. Then, it is judged in step S508 whether a letter of the addressee can be inferred. If it can be inferred, the program advances to step S510. If not, information is obtained from the user in step S509 and the program returns to step S508. In step S510, reply of the sender is prepared on the basis of the contents of the input information and those of the retrieved information and inferred letter of the addressee. Then, it is judged in step S511 whether or not the input information is complete. If complete, this processing is finished. If not complete, the lacking information is obtained from the user in step S512 and next, the program returns to step S511. In contrast, if no relation between the sender and the addressee is detected, it is judged in step S513 whether or not the input information is complete. If complete, this processing is finished. If not complete, the lacking information is obtained from the user in step S514 and next, the program returns to step S513. Hereinafter, an operation of this embodiment will be described by using a practical example in the case of preparing a letter. As shown in FIG. 48, when the expression "meet John at Duke on 7th after IJCAI conference to discuss on LWS. reserve accommodation." is inputted, the CA 31 outputs the concepts C1 to C5 to the understander 32 as a result of the analysis of the input expression. The processing to be performed on these concepts by the pre-understander 91 will be described hereunder by referring to a flowchart of FIG. 10. First, in step S201, the pre-understander 91 examines each of the concepts. At that time, two of these concepts, namely, C2 and C4 are determined as unknown concepts. Because of the facts that the concept C3 subsequent to the concept C2 is "conference" and is not connected to another concept, the pre-understander 91 infers that the concept C2 (IJCAI) is the name of a conference. Here, the user may input information representing the place where the conference is held, the period of time when the conference is held, subject for discussion and so forth. On the other hand, in view of the facts that the concept C4 (LWS) appears subsequently to the concept C11 represented by the word "discuss" and that the concept C11 can be followed by five types of groups of nouns of FIG. 49 as possible candidates for filling the slot of "object", the pre-understander asks the user whether or not LWS is the name of one of the groups of FIG. 49. In this case, LWS is a name and are capital letters. Therefore, it is nearly impossible to select 3, 4 or 5. In the case of this example, there are no objects to be processed in steps S202 and S203. Thus a program for performing this process advances to step S204. Here, note that two persons named John are found in the SDB of FIG. 49. Therefore, the system performs a confirmation process on the results obtained by CA31 as illustrated in a flow chart of FIG. 50. First, in step S521, the system asks the user which of the persons named John the user selects. If the user selects "John Smith" in step S522, the system further confirms in step S523 whether or not John is transferred to the Duke University. This is because the SDB indicates that John Smith belongs to the Rochester University, while the word "Duke" is inputted together with the word "John". In the case where the user's answer is "Yes", the program advances to step S524 whereupon the name of the University, to which "John Smith" belongs, is changed to "the Duke University" in the SDB. In contrast, if the user's answer points out his mistake, the corresponding concept is corrected in step S525. If the user's answer points out the temporary transfer (or tentative movement) of John Smith, this fact is described in the SDB in step S526. Incidentally, in the aforementioned case, if the SDB indicates that only one person named John belongs to the Duke University, the process of FIG. 50 may be omitted and this person may be finally identified as the one searched for by the user. Next, in step S205, the resultant concepts are completed with more inferred information. For instance, an inference concerning a time is performed by using the WKB. Here, it is assumed that the clock/calendar of the system indicates the present date as March 15, 1993, that the tense is "future tense", that the period of time, during which the conference of IJCAI is held, is April 24 to 28, 1993 (the information representing this period is inputted in step S201, though this information may be inputted in step S205) and that the user wishes to meet John after this conference. Thus the system infers that the month indicated by the letter is the next month after April. Thus, the system completes the date "7th" represented by the information as "7th May, 1993". Further, note that the slot information corresponding to the concept C5 "Iobj Reason" is missing. The understander, however, infers from the knowledge contained in the DKB 38 that the action is "USE RESOURCE", as illustrated in FIG. 51. Next, the processing by the main understander 92 will be described hereinbelow by referring to FIG. 11. First, in step S211, actors contained in the information are detected. In this input example, the sender is Aruna Rohra and the addressee is John Smith. Next, the establishment of the relation between the sender and the addressee is attempted. For this, the data base is searched for the contents of the correspondences therebetween, which have been obtained up to this point of time. If no contents of the correspondences therebetween are present in the data base, this input letter is inferred to be a first letter for making an agreement therebetween. Subsequently, in step S212, goals are inferred as illustrated in FIG. 52(a). Then, in step S213, a chaining inference illustrated in FIG. 53 is performed by the process as shown in FIG. 52(b). Then, in step S214, a planning for understanding the input is made. Namely, a task network having the structure of FIG. 54 is formed. A plan "PB_INTERACT", which has a plan "M_VISIT", is obtained as that corresponding to the "ASK" by performing this process. Thus all of the input information becomes explicable. Next, the processing to be performed in the post-understander 93 will be described hereunder. First, in step S221, the entire task network is simulated in order to find a part of the plan, and/or any preconditions, which the user may have forgotten. As a result, the example of the task network of FIG. 55 is obtained. In this case, for instance, the plans "M_VISIT" and the "DPOSSESS (time or fix appointment)" are not explicitly stated by the user. Further, the system points out to the user that a deposit may be necessary for booking a room at a hotel. Next, the processing to be performed by the text preparator 33 will be described hereinafter by referring to FIGS. 14 to 16. First, in step S301, the introductory part of a text is prepared. In this case, the addressee is an unknown person and has no business relation to the sender. Therefore, the sender introduces himself in the introductory part. Thus, it becomes "I am working on Letter writing system". Information needed to prepare this part is obtained from the data base concerning the sender himself. Next, in step S302, the main goal is described. In this case, the "ASK (discuss)" is described. Further, in step S311, the main plan is described. In this case, the "M_VISIT" is stated as a plan corresponding to the "ASK", with reference to the "ATTEND_CONF" whose plan is also the "M_VISIT". Then, in step S312, the AD of the "AGREEMENT (fix appointment)" belonging to the plan "DPOSSESS" is stated as the precondition for the main plan. In this case, the processing to be performed in step S313 is omitted. Further, in step S314, another part of the main plan is described. Thereby, the AD of the AGREEMENT" belonging to the "RESERVE_LODGE" is described. Further, the AD of the "ATRANS" belonging to the DKNOW", which is a precondition, is described, if selected by the user. Because the addressee is an unknown person, the statement "Looking forward to hearing from you." is selected in step S321 as a closing statement. Thereafter, the processings subsequent to that to be performed by the generator 34 are carried out. As a result, the letter illustrated in FIG. 56 is output. Next, another example of the process of preparing a letter will be described hereinbelow. When the statement "Reply to John's letter accepting to meet on 10th May at 3 pm to discuss on PDA systems." is inputted as illustrated in FIG. 57, the CA 31 outputs the concept C1 of this figure to the understander 32 as a result of the analysis of the input statement. In this case, the processing to be performed by the main understander 92 will be described by referring to FIG. 11, on the assumption that there are no objects to be processed by the pre-understander 91. First, in step S211, actors contained in the information are detected. As illustrated in FIG. 58(a), in this input example, the sender is Aruna Rohra and the addressee is John Smith. Further, the kind of the letter is a reply. Moreover, it is assumed that no previous correspondance relevant to this letter exist in the data base. However, the contents of the letter can be inferred from the input information. Further, the sender expects a response and a letter from the addressee can be inferred from the concept C3 obtained from the input information. Then, if the concept C3 is processed by performing the procedure described in FIG. 11 by means of the main understander 92, the goal is inferred in step S212 as illustrated in FIG. 58(d). Subsequently, the chaining inference of FIG. 59 is performed in step S213. Next, in step S214, planning for understanding the input letter is made. Namely, a task network having the structure of FIG. 60 is formed. Thereafter, in step S221, the missing input is made up for according to the plan of FIG. 60 by the post-understander 93. Consequently, the example of the task network of FIG. 61 can be obtained. Thereafter, in steps S300 and S400, the letter is reconstructed from the aforementioned plans for the purpose of confirmation. Next, the reply of the sender is inferred from the input information (or the concept C2 obtained therefrom). Corresponding to the AD of the preceding letter obtained in the aforesaid manner, the "S_MAINGOAL", which indicates that the PDA system is to discussed, is determined as an acceptable request as illustrated in FIG. 58(e). Further, the "S_MAINPLAN" indicating that the sender meet the addressee is accepted. Additionally, a more specific time, namely, "May 10th, 3 p.m." is specified correspondingly to the "S_PLAN (for example, May 8th or later)". Thereafter, the processing similar to that performed in the case of the aforementioned example is performed. Consequently, the letter of FIG. 62 is generated. Hereunder, still another example of a letter will be described. In the case of this example, the contents of the preceding letter can be obtained from the data base. Hereinafter, the differences between this example and the aforementioned example will be mainly described. As illustrated in FIG. 63, when the sentence "Reply to John's letter confirming the meeting time, 19th May at 3 pm. Also, request him to arrange for pickup." are inputted, the concepts C1 and C4 are outputted from the CA 31. The relevant previous letters are obtained in the main understander 92 from the data base. Thereby, it can be known that a visit is made after 10th May and that a response to John's letter should be made. Further, as illustrated in FIG. 64(d), the preceding letter is retrieved from the data base. Moreover, as illustrated in FIG. 64(e), the "S_MAINGOAL", which indicates that the discussion is conducted, is assumed as an acceptable request. Furthermore, the "S_MAINPLAN" indicating that people meet is accepted. These matters are inferred from the input statement "... confirming the meeting time, 19th May at 3 pm". Thus, the more practical date, namely, "19th May at 3 pm" is indicated correspondingly to the "S_PLAN". In addition to the reply prepared as described above, another request (namely, the request "the sender wishes to be picked up" is obtained from the input expression "request him to arrange for pickup") is added as a letter from the sender. Thereafter, the processing similar to that of the case of the aforementioned example is performed. Consequently, the letter of FIG. 65 is generated. Hereinafter, yet another example of a letter will be described. In the case of this example, the system can not infer the addressee's letter from currently inputted information and thus requests the user to input information. Hereunder, the differences between this example and each of the aforesaid examples will be mainly described. As illustrated in FIG. 66, when the statement "Reply to John's letter." is inputted, the concept C1 is outputted from the CA 31. In the main understander 92, the contents of the relevant previous letters are obtained from the data base. Further, it is known that a visit is made after 10th May. Moreover, it is confirmed by the user that John's letter should be responded. Furthermore, as illustrated in FIG. 66(d), the preceding letter is retrieved from the data base. As is seen in FIG. 66(e), nothing is specified from the currently inputted information. Thus, the system can not infer the addressee's letter, with the result that the system requests the user to input information representing the contents of this letter by means of, for example, OCR (Optical Character Reader). Then, the contents of the letter as illustrated in FIG. 66(e) is inputted to the system. Thereafter, the processing illustrated in FIG. 67 is performed similarly as in the case of the aforementioned example. Consequently, the letter of FIG. 68 is generated. Next, an operation of preparing an example of a text of the treatise type will be described hereinbelow. This example is a text in which predetermined elements such as a purpose and a conclusion are described by using technical terms, similarly as in the case of the specification for a patent application. In the case of describing the text of this type, a wealth of technical knowledge is required. For instance, the details of themes and names are extracted from the data base. Further, the details of data, topics and key words are obtained from the input information. Thereby, achievements or results can be obtained. FIG. 42(a) illustrates an example of the rules for preparing a text of this type. These rules are applied in the order as illustrated in this figure, whereby a text is prepared. As illustrated in this figure, the background of the contents of the text is introduced from reports and results obtained up to this point of time. Next, primary points of results are enumerated as purposes. Further, as achievements, the input text obtained from the user is elaborated, so that refined and rational text is obtained. Subsequently, the points of the aforementioned text are stated as a conclusion or a summary. Finally, the relevant attached papers are described if referred to in the description of the result otherwise obtained from the user. In the foregoing description, it has been described that most of the information representing the contents of a treatise is inputted by the user. However, in the case where the system is provided with the understander 32 for understanding the user's intention from the input information, the system can easily prepare a text by utilizing the expert knowledge contained in the knowledge base and by understanding an outline inputted by the user even if the contents of a study are not inputted at all. Next, an example of an operation of preparing a manual will be described hereinbelow. First, in the case where the system generates a manual for a single kind of a product such as a copying machine or a word processor, the system has widespread knowledge about such a product. Therefore, the system requires only a relatively small amount of input information. Further, the system can provide a help function or facility using a natural language. Moreover, the system can prepare and update a text of a manual. Furthermore, the system can be used for translating the manual from a language into another language. However, in the case where the system generates manuals for a plurality of products in a technical field, namely, software or office equipments, the system requires input information concerning the details of such a product. This is because of the fact that the system does not have profound understanding about each of the products. The system can perform merely the functions of summarizing and editing the manual rather than the function of preparing the manual. Additionally, in such a case, the system can translate the manual from a language into another language ostensibly or superficially. Such a method can be achieved by a system which has no understander. These two types of techniques can be selected respectively corresponding to a case where specific knowledge concerning a single article should be contained in the knowledge base of a predetermined size, or another case where knowledge concerning many articles should be contained in the knowledge base of the predetermined size. FIG. 69 illustrates an example of a text preparation rule for a user manual of word processor. Next, an example of a help facility of a word processor using a natural language will be described hereinbelow. The system may be adapted to understand a natural-language inquiry or question statement inputted by the user when utilizing the help facility. Alternatively, input information for a help facility may be inputted by simply using keys or commands. In this case, each command is modeled in such a manner as to have the goal-plan structure. An example of this structure is illustrated in FIG. 70. Further, referring to FIG. 71, there is shown an example of a reply in the case where a bold typeface and the type size of 12 points are designated. In addition to the knowledge concerning the goal-plan structure, the system needs knowledge concerning an installation procedure and a disk. The characteristic aspect or feature of this system resides in that a list of all of plans arranged in an appropriate order is formed as a response to the requested help function. Thereby, the system can output an response sentence, which corresponds to the user and the circumstances more suitably, in comparison with the case of simply outputting a fixed sentence as a reply. Next, an example of an operation of preparing a text according to information sent from a sub-system will be described hereunder. When the system understands the contents of input information, the system calls a sub-system such as an expert system. Generally, an expert system is a system adapted to contain knowledge owned by an expert to deal with various situations and to offer advice according to rules provided therein. Such a sub-system offers advice by using all inference/rule-selection mechanisms. Further, useful information is processed by the text preparing system. This system has a rule for determining what information should be contained in a text to be finally outputted, for instance, a rule for stating only important portions by describing only events, the possibilities of which are not less than 30 %, and by neglecting the other events. Thus, in the case of such a system, an information filtering, which is an operation of stating only the most closely related matters among matters to be stated, can be achieved. Further, if a user is a beginner, he may not know the technical details of such a rule. This system, then, can determine the contents of an output text according to the technical level or skill of the user. Incidentally, as long as the functions of the system of the present invention can be performed, the system of the present invention may be of the single-unit type or of the type that consists of a plurality of composing units. Apparently, the present invention can be applied to the case where the processing is performed by providing programs to the system or unit. As described above, the present invention has an advantage in that a high-quality text with contents and structure required for an output text can be generated by understanding a user's intention according to input information. Although the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described above, it is to be understood that the present invention is not limited thereto and that other modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. The scope of the present invention, therefore, is to be determined solely by the appended claims.

Claims: A text preparing system comprising: input means (1) for inputting information; a knowledge base (23,39) for storing knowledge including a text preparation rule and an attribute of a reader; retrieval means (22,33) for retrieving knowledge which relates to the information inputted by said input means from said knowledge base; determining means (22,33) for determining contents of a text to be outputted and a describing order of the contents based on the inputted information and the retrieved knowledge; and generating means (22,34) for generating the text containing the contents in the describing order determined by said determining means, characterised in that said attribute of the reader is arranged to include a relationship between the reader and the author of the text, said text preparation rule is arranged to include first groups of rules (Figs. 42(a), 42(b), 69) and second groups of rules (Figs. 43-45), wherein each of the first groups of rules is arranged to correspond to a respective one document type of the text and rules of each first group are arranged to define the kinds of contents of the text and the order of describing the contents, and wherein each of the second groups of rules is arranged for a kind of the content to define respective alternatives in correspondence with different relationships between the reader and the author; and in that said determining means is adapted to determine the kinds of contents of text and the describing order thereof by applying rules for the document type of the text in the first groups in a predetermined order and said determining means is adapted to determine a specific content for each of the determined kinds of the contents by selecting one of the alternatives defined in the rules for the kind of content in the second groups in correspondence with the relationship between the reader and the author, and wherein the attribute of the reader further includes a level of the reader's ability and said text preparation rule further includes a rule for providing information filtering to define a specific content in correspondence with the level of the reader's ability. The text preparing system according to claim 1, wherein said relationship includes a level of familiarity of the reader with the author of the text. The text preparing system according to claim 1, wherein the attribute of the reader further includes a social position of the reader and said text preparation rule further includes a rule which defines a specific content in correspondence with the social position of the reader. The text preparing system according to any preceding claim, further comprising understanding means (21,32) for understanding a user's intention, wherein said knowledge base includes knowledge of goals and plans; said understanding means being operable to understand the user's intention by retrieving the knowledge of goals and plans from said knowledge base based upon the input information, and to generate information which relates to the text to be outputted; and said determining means being also operable to determine the contents of the text from the information generated by said understanding means. The text preparing system according to claim 4, wherein said input means inputs information represented in a natural language and said understanding means has analysis means (31) for analysing a concept corresponding to the information inputted and represented in the natural language. A text preparing method wherein a text preparing system performs the steps of: inputting information; retrieving information relating to the inputted information from a knowledge base (23,39) storing knowledge including a text preparation rule and an attribute of a reader; determining contents of a text to be outputted and a describing order of the contents based on the inputted information and the retrieved knowledge; and generating the text containing the contents in the describing order determined in said determining step, characterised in that said text preparation rule is arranged to include first groups of rules (Figs. 42(a), 42(b), 69) and second groups of rules (Figs. 43-45), wherein each of the first groups of rules is arranged to correspond to a respective one document type of the text and rules of each first group are arranged to define the kinds of contents of the text and the order of describing the contents, and wherein each of the second groups of rules defines respective alternatives for each kind of contents in correspondence with different relationships between the reader and the author; and in that said determining step determines the kinds of contents of text and the describing order thereof by applying rules for the document type of the text in the first groups in a predetermined order and said determining step determines a specific content for each of the determined kinds of the contents by selecting one of the alternatives defined in the rules for the kind of content in the second groups in correspondence with the relationship between the reader and the author, and wherein the attribute of the reader further includes a level of the reader's ability and said text preparation rule further includes a rule providing information filtering to define a specific content in correspondence with the level of the reader's ability. The text preparing method according to claim 6, wherein said relationship includes a level of familiarity of the reader with the author of the text. The text preparing method according to claim 6, wherein the attribute of the reader further includes a social position of the reader and said text preparation rule further includes a rule which defines a specific content in correspondence with the social position of the reader. The text preparing method according to any of claims 6 to 8, further comprising the step of understanding a user's intention, wherein said knowledge base includes knowledge of goals and plans; in said understanding step, the user's intention is understood by retrieving the knowledge of goals and plans from said knowledge base based upon the input information, and information which relates to the text to be outputted is generated; and in said determining step, the contents of the text are also determined from the information generated in said understanding step. The text preparing method according to claim 9, wherein information represented in a natural language is inputted in said inputting step and a concept corresponding to the input information represented in the natural language is analysed in said understanding step. A computer program comprising processor implementable instructions for carrying out a method as claimed in any of claims 6 to 10.

Inventors: JEYACHANDRAN SURESH, SUDA ARUNA ROHRA, JEYACHANDRAN, SURESH, SUDA, ARUNA ROHRA
Applicants: CANON KK, CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Application year: 1995
Main classification: G06F17
IPC codes: G06F17