A document processing and data distribution system

Abstract: An information processing system, comprising: a database with stored data items (204-214; Fig.2)relating to activities, such as aircraft flights, a number of said data items (204-214; Fig.2) being represented on a respective portion (17; 202, Fig. 2)of a paper strip (4) corresponding to one of flights, a processor (9), coupled (10) to the database, for updating one or more of said data items (204-214; Fig.2) in response to a user operation. The system further includes a plurality of workstations, each workstation comprising a rack (2) for removably mounting the strips (4) in an array, a camera (6) and a projector (8) focussed on the array, each camera (6) and projector (8) being coupled to the processor (9). The user operations include marking a sign or mark (16) on a strip (4), the processor (9) being programmed for recognising the sign, and optionally causing the display of a sign or mark (18) on the corresponding strip of a user at another workstation.

Description: This invention relates to a document processing and data distribution system, and in particular to one in which a user manipulates documents relating to activities, such that the manipulations give rise to the distribution of updated information to an electronically stored database and/or to other users. The invention is particularly, but not exclusively, suited to air traffic control (ATC) environments. In modern ATC environments, the ever-increasing volume of traffic requires new methods to assist controllers with their tasks. An ATC workstation commonly includes a terminal on the controller's desk to access a database, and a rack mounted on the wall above the terminal on which strips of paper or card, one strip for each flight, are placed, removed, annotated, moved around, etc. There is a need to integrate the currently paper-based flight strips ― which are manipulated by air traffic controllers ― with the electronic radar information systems provided via external data links. This would give flight progress computers information on controllers' intentions, which controllers currently record by simply writing on the paper strips, in turn facilitating calculation of more accurate arrival/departure times, and provision of more sophisticated tools such as advance collision avoidance systems (ACAS). Previous proposals for this integration problem have centred around the complete replacement of paper strips with electronic analogues, enabling flight computers to capture information on controllers activities directly through interaction with the electronic strip interface. Invariably, such techniques have resulted in deterioration on ATC service provision, and their failure has served to highlight the functionalities of the strips when they take the form of pieces of paper. These functionalities include the ease with which the paper strips can be stacked up vertically in front of the controller, 'cocked' out of position to indicate potential control problems, passed between controllers and, perhaps most importantly, quickly and flexibly annotated with a pen. The present invention provides an information processing system, comprising: means for storing a database of data items relating to activities, a number of said data items being represented on a respective portion of a portable medium corresponding to one of said activities, processing means, coupled to the storing means, for updating one or more of said data items in response to a user operation, a plurality of workstations, each workstation comprising means for removably mounting said portable media in an array, a camera and a projector focussed on the array, each camera and projector being coupled to the processing means, wherein said user operations include marking a sign on a portable medium, and wherein said processing means includes means for recognising said sign. A video camera is located above each controller's (rack of) flight strips to act as an input device for the flight progress computers, and a video projector, adjacent the camera overlays information generated by the computer on top of the flight strips. When a controller annotates a paper strip with a pen, the annotation(s) is (are) captured by the camera, extracted from the image and processed by the flight progress computer. The results of this processing can be fed to other computer-based tools. As necessary, the results of the raw annotations can be displayed on other controllers' flight strips by dedicated computer-controlled image projectors. An advantage is that the invention augments the conventional ATC arrangement, preserving the benefits of paper-based 'direct interaction', while providing the enhancement of integrated information systems. The solution is ideal in that it does not require the replacement of paper flight progress strips, but integrates the paper strips with the electronic flight progress computers, allowing annotations by pen to be captured, processed and propagated as necessary. Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 shows (a) a simplified diagram of a conventional ATC suite and (b) the geographical region covered by that ATC suite; Figure 2 shows examples of live flight strips printed for a single aircraft; Figure 3 illustrates typical controller annotations of flight strips; Figure 4 is a schematic illustration of (a) the arrangement of flight strip rack, camera and projector at each controller's workstation, and (b) an electronically augmented flight progress strip; Figure 5 is a flow chart of (a) the data processing operations relating to radar data and flight information, and (b)-(d) the image processing techniques in the processing of the flight strips. Referring to Fig. 1, this shows a simplified diagram of a conventional ATC suite (at Pole Hill): it is a simplified representation and is not to scale. In particular, Designator Strips are all the same size (the size of a flight strip) and the width of the strip rack 'bays' is uniform. The map (Fig. 1(b)) shows how Designator Strip positions correspond to geographical locations of the reporting points they represent. As shown in Fig. 1(a), the ATC suite typically includes static map displays 102, an early warning radar (showing all LATCC airspace), live strip racks 106, and radar displays 108, 110 (in this case for the Irish Sea and Pole Hill sectors, respectively). In addition, the ATC suite includes chinographs 112 with weather information, pigeon holes 114 for 'hour blocks' of dead flight strips and empty strip holders 116. A computer terminal 118 gives the ATC controller access to the database, and enables the controller to print out strips on the connected printer 120. Turning to Fig.2, this shows examples of live flight strips printed for a single aircraft (they are not based on actual flight strips but are included as examples of strip arrangement). Strips 1 ○ and 2 ○ are for the Ottringham and Pole Hill reporting points, respectively, and would be placed in front of the Pole Hill sector controller (see Fig. 1). Strip 3 ○ is for the Isle of Man reporting point and would be placed in front of the Irish Sea sector controller. Each flight strip 4 is preferably of a standard format, and has a number of sections or portions 202, each section 202 having a predetermined purpose, i.e. as a location for a printed data item and/or as a place in which controllers can make annotations. The data items printed on the strip typically include the arrival time 204 at the reporting point, the identifier 206 of the reporting point the strip is for, the call sign 208, the squawk indent 210, route information 212 and the last reporting point and time 214. Section 216 provides a scribble box for controllers in which to make annotations. Figure 3 illustrates typical controller annotations of flight strips. In Fig. 3(a) a "clean" strip is shown. Figs 3(b) and (c) show respectively a strip marked by hand by a controller with signs 302 and 304 to indicate a requested action in relation to the flight, and a strip marked by hand by a controller with sign 306 to indicate a completed action. Referring to Figure 4, this is a schematic illustration of (a) the arrangement of flight strip rack, camera and projector at each controller's workstation, and (b) an electronically augmented flight progress strip. The rack 2 is mounted above the controller's VDU terminal(s) (displaying radar data such as current aircraft position; not shown), and supports paper flight strips 4 which in this case are arranged in three columns. A camera 6 and a video projector 8 are focussed on the array of flight strips 4, and both are connected to image processing hardware 9. A similar camera and videoprojector arrangement is known from EP-A-495622. A controller sits in front of the rack 2 and is able to talk to the pilots of the aircraft and other controllers using a radio/telephone. The image processing hardware 9 carries out the image processing techniques as described below. Via link 10, annotation data giving information on the future state of the airspace can be added to data from other sources, such as radar processing, to allow development of systems such as conflict detection and collision alert. Also, via link 12, annotations can be propagated to other controllers' displays (VDU or video projectors) and superimposed on appropriate flight strips. In Fig. 4(b) an electronically augmented flight progress strip is shown: the strip has pre-printed information 14, hand-drawn annotations 16, and annotations 18 super-imposed by the projector 8. The hand-drawn annotation 16 may be in different colours (corresponding to controllers at different levels of responsibility in the ATC room), and the image processing system may incorporate simple techniques for distinguishing between the markings of different colours, i.e. so that the marks of a supervisory controller take priority over those of a lower level controller. In the preferred embodiment, the hand-drawn annotations 16 are captured by the camera, processed where necessary by performing handwriting recognition techniques which are known in the art; and then this information is propagated to the workstation of selected other ATC controllers. The video projector 8 at each of the selected workstations is commanded by the processing system 9 to display the information (which in the case of characters and numerals has preferably been converted into an appropriate font) in a suitable section of the corresponding flight strip 4. In Fig. 4, the marking 18 has been made by a controller at a remote workstation, and has been processed and displayed by the video projector 8 at the current workstation in the appropriate section 17 of the strip 4. Referring to Fig. 5(a), this is a flow chart of the data processing operations relating to radar data and flight information, while Figs 5(b)-(d) are flow charts of the image processing employed when a controller carries out manipulations on a flight strip. Traditionally, ATC controllers mark flight strips when decisions are made relating to a flight. These decisions affect the path of the aircraft, and hence the work of other controllers. These changes (decisions) are manually relayed between controllers, but are not entered into the integrated radar data and flight plan processing systems. By employing the present invention, the information processing systems will have more detailed and accurate data reflecting both (a) radar data and flight plan data, and (b) controlling data. The data processing operations relating to radar data and flight information are shown in Fig. 5 (a). Initially, the system waits (step S1) for receipt of new target information (e.g. relating to an incoming flight). On receiving such information, the information is used in step S2 to update the screen displays of appropriate controllers and as updated information to be logged into the history store (not shown)of the data processing system. At step S3, a check is made for any conflicts with currently processed flights, and if there is none the system returns to waiting for new target information (at step S1). In the event of a conflict being found, the data from the the strip information database is read and checked at step S4. At step S5 a further analysis is made to establish whether there is still a conflict with any currently processed flight. If there is none, the system returns to waiting for new target information (at step S1). If it is found that the conflict remains, the system checks (step S6) whether the alert system is on, and if it is not, then the alert system is switched on at step S7. If the alert system is already on, it is switched (step s8) to a more imperative stage in the warning procedure. The image processing employed when a controller carries out manipulations on a flight strip are shown in Fig. 5(b). In step S10, the system captures an image of the flight strips 4 in the controller's rack 2. A check is then made to find if the is any change from when the image of the strips was last grabbed, and if there is no change, the processing returns (after a predetermined time which may be set in a conventional way beforehand) to grab a new image of the strips. If a change has occurred, the difference (e.g. on a pixel-by-pixel basis) is extracted at step S12. This step preferably includes the discarding of spurious artifacts in the image, as is known in the art (e.g. Jähne B., Digital Image Processing, Ch. 6, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1991), and handwriting or optical character recognition techniques, which are known in the art. In this way, the information which has been added (e.g. a controller's annotation) is determined. At step S13 a check is made to establish whether flight strips of other controllers need to be updated (i.e. via their video projector). This may include comparing the information determined in step S12 with a table of possible markings (corresponding to possible controller commands/decisions) stored in memory (not shown). If other strips have to be updated, the new image data is sent (step S14) to the projection processing hardware of all affected workstations (controllers). This step is described in further detail below with reference to Fig. 5(e). Thereafter, the information obtained from the differencing step (S12) is passed to the strip data processing (described in further detail below with reference to Fig. 5(d)). Fig. 5(c) illustrates the substeps of step S14 in Fig. 5(b). Initially, the system waits (step S142) for the new image data. Then, the new image data is combined at step 144 with images from the cameras at other controllers' workstations. Finally, the projected image is changed at step 146. Fig. 5(c) illustrates the substeps of step S15 in Fig. 5(b). Initially, the system waits (step S152) for information from the strip camera processing. Once this information has been received, an OCR/pattern matching operation is performed on the information at step S154. Thereafter, the processed information is added (step S156) to the strip information database stored in memory. In one embodiment of the invention, the rack 2 may be adapted to support the strips not only in a position where the strips are flat with their planes parallel to the plane of the rack, but in one or more alternative positions, for example 'cocked' out of position to indicate potential control problems. This processing technique may be incorporated into step S12 of Fig. 5(b). For example, each holder in the rack 2 may be capable of supporting a strip 4 so that it is tilted away from the plane of the rack (see Fig. 4(a) with the top edge of the strip spaced apart from the plane of the rack; and the strip may thereby make an angle of 30-50 degrees with the plane of the rack. When in such a position, the strip unveils a portion 5 (see Fig. 4) of the rack's planar surface 3 above the top edge of the strip 4. The planar surface 3 may be of a colour or gray level which provides sufficient contrast with respect to the material of the flight strips for the image processing to determine that the portion 5 is exposed and therefore that the strip 4 is tilted out of the normal position. Alternatively, as will be apparent to the person skilled in the art, it may be possible to support a strip rotated by 90 degrees while remaining parallel to the plane of the rack 2; and the image processing may include a routine for sensing this disposition accordingly. Such a technique means that the potential control problem is both immediately visible to the local controller and the fact that it exists is readily distributable to other controllers who need to be aware of it.

Claims: An information processing system, comprising: means for storing a database of data items (204-214, 14,16,18) relating to activities, a number of said data items (204-214,14,16,18) being represented on a respective portion (202,17) of a portable medium (4) corresponding to one of said activities, processing means (9), coupled to the storing means, for updating one or more of said data items (204-214, 14,16,18) in response to a user operation, a plurality of workstations, each workstation comprising means (2) for removably mounting said portable media (4) in an array, a camera (6) and a projector (8) focussed on the array, each camera (6) and projector (8) being coupled to the processing means (9), wherein said user operations include marking a sign (302-306; 16,18)on a portable medium (4), and wherein said processing means (9) includes means for recognising said sign (302-306;16,18). The system according to claim 1, wherein said processing means (9) further includes means for causing the projector (8) of one or more other workstations to project said sign (302-306;16,18) onto a corresponding portable medium (4). The system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the processing means (9) includes means for converting the sign (302-306;16,18) into a standard representation (16) before it is projected onto a portable medium (4). The system according to claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the processing means (9) includes means for recognising signs (302-306) of different shapes, said different shapes representing different statuses of said activities. The system according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the processing means (9) includes means for recognising signs (302-306) of different colours, said different colours representing different statuses of said activities and/or different users. The system according to claim 5, wherein the processing means (9) is adapted to modify data items stored in the database in dependence on the colour of the sign(s). The system according to any of the preceding claims wherein the activities are sequential activities. The system according to any of the preceding claims wherein said user operations include moving a portable medium (4) from a first position to a second position, and wherein said processing means (9) includes means for determining whether said portable medium is in said first position or said second position. An information processing system, comprising: means for storing a database of data items (204-214, 14,16,18) relating to activities, a number of said data items (204-214, 14,16,18) being represented on a respective portion (202,17) of a portable medium (4) corresponding to one of said activities, processing means (9), coupled to the storing means, for updating one or more of said data items (204-214, 14,16,18) in response to a user operation, a plurality of workstations, each workstation comprising means (2) for removably mounting said portable media (4) in an array, a camera (6) and a projector (8) focussed on the array, each camera and projector being coupled to the processing means (9), wherein said user operations include moving a portable medium (4) from a first position to a second position, and wherein said processing means (9) includes means for determining whether said portable medium (4) is in said first position or said second position.

Inventors: BENTLEY RICHARD M, HARPER RICHARD H R, BENTLEY, RICHARD M., HARPER, RICHARD H. R.
Applicants: XEROX CORP, XEROX CORPORATION
Application year: 1995
Main classification: G08G5
IPC codes: G06K17, G08G5