SIMPLIFIED MULTI-CALL PROCESSING

Abstract: The present invention demonstrates a method to structure call processing in a telecommunication system, preferably by way of hardware/software, to create a standard and generic structure, which is utilizing a half-call principle and comprising a session including a session controller (SC) handling the half-call creating a first entry port (PA-B) to handle the protocol from a dialogue request and simultaneously also creating a second entry port (PA-A) to handle a second dialogue request, whereby it is ensured that the second dialogue request by being directed to the second entry port incorporated in the actual session will be able to join an ongoing call if the party having the ongoing call accepts the second dialogue request.

Description: SIMPLIFIED MULTI-CALL PROCESSING TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention refers to a data structure for call processing and particularly to a data structuring enabling a simple way for multi-call in a traffic controlling process for a telecommunication application. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In a modern telecommunication switching system new telephone applications are develloped all the time. This means that it should be easy to extend the switching system with new applica¬ tions. During processing of a call in a telecommunication system a large amount of data needs to be handled or collected. Such call related data differs a lot between calls depending on what kind of services are utilized in the specific call, which protocols are used to communicate with the surrounding networks etc. Data contains information useful for different kinds of users of the telecommunication system. One network/service provider may want to create billing records while another wants to create statis¬ tics of different kinds. As the vendor wants to be independent of which data the user wants to use and still be able to add new data together with a new service without having to change already existing software, this call related data record have to be handled in a new efficient way. There exist a number of possible solutions to handle the call related data. One obvious way is to use a conventional database to collect the information, which quickly renders into capacity problems. Another solution is choose a declarative solution where a declaration of the contents is made (e.g. compare a record in Pascal) . The drawback of a declarative solution as a Pascal record is that it does not present the desired flexibility. Yet another approach is to send around the data between the objects whenever it is needed, which creates duplication of data. In the state of the art there are found several concepts regarding object oriented software structures for processing in a modern telecommunication system. EP-0 524 089 Al titled "Structure de logiciel pour systeme de traitement de donnees, notamment pour systeme de telecommunications" describes a logical structure system for processing data, specifically for tele¬ communication systems. The structure particularly simplifies the real time communication between the objects according to the CCITT rules X 200. EP-0 524 077 Al titled "Structure de logiciel pour systeme de traitement d'informations" describe a structure which hides the hardware and software system features to the application programs. EP-0 470 415 A2 describes a method to supply a number of application processors in a telephony system access to call related information in a common database. The information is tagged and stored temporarily as a record in the database as long as the communication lasts. The information is particularly directed for being directly viewed on a display terminal for supervision in an operator controlled switching system. Another problem involves how to efficiently handle a multi-call situation. A multi-call means that a call with more than two subscribers should be able to set up. When a call is made from a subscriber (A) to another subscriber (B) the connection is set up in a normal way. When a third subscriber (C) , as indicated in Fig. 1 is calling the first subscriber (A) it should be possible to join the call, i.e. that the first subscriber (A) gets an indication that another call is coming in and can accept or reject this. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Therefore there is a demand in a telecommunication system, preferably by way of software and/or hardware, to create a standard and generic structure for multi-calling, which makes it possible to extend said system with new services and data without effecting an already existing operating software of a system using the half-call principle. A first object according to the present invention in a process, utilizing a half-call principle, comprising a session including a session controler handling the half-call is to create a first entry port to handle the protocol from a dialogue request and simultaneously also create a second entry port to handle a second dialogue request, whereby it is ensured that the second dialogue request being directed to the second entry port incorporated in the session will be able to join an ongoing call if the party having the ongoing call accepts the second dialogue request. A second object according to the present invention is that the dialogue request will be received by a setup server, which directs the dialogue request to the session. A third object according to the present invention is that the session uses a memory function in which different records store references in form of pointers to a local memory function, a pointer being combined with a tag element by means of which locally stored data will be uniquely identified. A fourth object according to the present invention is that the session uses a session record for storing references in form of pointers to executing objects and to data objects of the call and from which record it will be possible to locate all other objects within the session, if tag elements under which objects are stored are known. A fifth object according to the present invention is that the session comprises a traffic case scope having a similar structure as a session scope, and a traffic case record is referenced from the session record, and the traffic case record is created to store references to executing objects of a call. A sixth object according to the present invention is that a transaction record stores data objects belonging to a traffic case. A seventh object according to the present invention is that the tag element is realized by an integer number uniquely assigned to each executing object or data object used. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The invention, together with further objects and advantages thereof, may best be understood by making reference to the following description taken together with the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 illustrates a general case including a multi-call situation; Figure 2 illustrates generally the principle using an A-Half Call and a B-Half Call; Figure 3 is an illustration of a session having a session controller, SC, handling several traffic cases including for each traffic case a respective originating call, OC, in communication with other traffic cases including a respective terminating call, TC; Figure 4 demonstrates a session controller, SC, using, according to the method and system of the present invention, a session record to store references to executing objects and a transaction record to store references to data objects; Figure 5 demonstrates collections according to the method and system of the present invention to store a traffic case object within an originating call, OC; Figure 6 is an demonstration of objects controlling the data flow in a session; Figure 7 demonstrates an example when data for a charging basis is extracted from a session; Figure 8 shows in a simple example the relation between created managed objects; Figure 9 shows the complete static view according to the simple example of Fig. 6,- Figure 10 illustrates how a static process represented by the setup server starts a dynamic process by means of the session controler as shown in Fig. 4; Figure 11 shows the steps for creating a session for a Half Call when the subscriber has no acti Ive call; Figure 12 demonstrates the steps in line with the step of Fig. 11 according to the present invention to join a session when the party already has an ongoing call; and Figure 13 is a summary of a multi-call processing connection including three subscribers according to the present invention. FUNDAMENTALS To be able to handle the subject of the present application in an efficient way it will be practical to first define a number of technical terms which will be useful throughout the following description. A common way to structure software in a call processing switching system for telephony is to divide the control of the call into two halves, a Half-Call A and a Half-Call B. This is illustrated in Fig. 2. The software which controls a Half-Call is executing in a process called a Session. A session can handle one or several Traffic Cases simultaneously (for example in a multi call situation) . The Traffic Case defines the functionality and data that handles a call in a Session. Note also that a three party call is handled by two Traffic Cases in a Session, one for each call leg. For the sake of simplicity the session is structured in different scopes and therefore is introduced the Session Scope and the Traffic Case Scope. This is illustrated in Fig. 3. The Session Scope is controlled by the Baseflow Session Controller. SC. The main task for the session controller is to act as a command interpreter against the Access Protocol, ACP and make a service analysis on these commands (Messages) . This includes then, for instance, initiating and terminating new Traffic Cases, distrib¬ uting information from the Access Protocol to the correct Traffic Case, initiating new services, etc. Every Traffic Case within the Session is controlled by one baseflow. Such a baseflow may be either an Originating Call. OC or a Terminating Call, TC. The main task for this " baseflow is to take care of the basic call handling. This includes for example establishing/disconnecting a call (including handling of the Telecommunication Service Protocol, TSP, between call halves) , ordering establishment/disconnection of connections (for example a speech connection) , ordering address information analysis, etc. To support the different scopes and the control logic operating within those, there is a need of a similar data structure. Thus the data must be structured in a certain way to make it possible to implement and maintain the applications. Correspondingly there exists two different types of objects, which in this description are denoted Executing Objects and Data Objects. An Executing Object will execute in the session, e. g., control objects, protocol objects, resource objects etc. A pure Data Object will contain data received for example from a Teleservice Protocol Message. It shall also be possible to make an output of this type of data for charging or for statistic purposes. The two types of Objects have different semantics and are stored in different records in the Session. This is illustrated in Fig. 4. One such record is referred to as a Session Record and is used to store pointers to protocol objects and resource objects instan¬ tiated by control and resource objects within the Session. The Objects stored in a Session Record are common for the whole Session. For storing references to pure Data Objects is used a Transaction Record. In a similar way as the Session Record stores pointers to objects the Transaction Record (also named call record) is used to store pointers to pure Data Objects instan¬ tiated by control, protocol, and resource objects within the Session or a Traffic Case executing in the Session. A users view of a Session Record is referred to a Session Record View and gives the user an interface to the Session Record on a high abstraction level. Similarly a users view of a Transaction Record is referred to as the Transaction Record View and gives the user an interface to the Transaction Record on a high abstraction level. Finally there is also found a Traffic Case Record which is a record where pointers to Objects belonging to a Traffic Case are stored. Only pointers to Protocol Objects and Resource Objects are stored in this record. For storing pure Data Objects a Transaction Record should be used. A users view of a Traffic Case Record is referred to a Traffic Case Record View and gives the user an interface to the Session Record on a high abstraction level. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT To support the different scopes and corresponding control logic for a call processing in a telecommunication system we need a suitable data structure. Data must be structured to make it possible to implement and maintain the applications. We therefore introduce two different types of objects, the executing objects and data objects, respectively, to keep track in an session. These two terms, which were already defined above, do have different semantics and are stored in different records in the created session. When storing an object in a collection it is only a question of storing a pointer to the object that is to be stored and consequently no duplication of the object itself is made in such a step. This also implies that for such a pointer storage there is actually no need to know the size of the particular object. Figure 3 is a generalized view of a session scope, which is controlled by the session controller SC. The session controller is acting as a command interpreter against the access protocol ACP, which is the generic term used for the subscriber or network accesses. As is evident from figure 3, the session contains one or several traffic cases, and here the particular session contains two traffic cases which are both of the OC type (originating call) . Each one of the two traffic cases of type OC is established by means of the respective traffic case to another traffic case of type TC (terminating call) through a handling telecommunication service protocol, TSP. As indicated in figure 4 there is in the session scope a session record, which shall be used for storing a pointer, PTR, to each executing object, for example to a so called session agent. The session record, SR, is by means of other pointers the root for the data structure in each session. The data objects of the whole session is found in the transaction record by means of their respective pointers, PTR. Each entry in the session record is having a particular name or key, TAG, which makes it possible to locate any object within the session scope if the particular system operator knows the particular name or TAG. Figure 5 is a generalized view of a traffic case scope, here containing an originating call type, OC, but a terminating call type, TC, would have the corresponding structure. This scope has to be introduced if the application has a need to execute an arbitrary number of parallel traffic cases in the session. The structure of the traffic case scope is thus similar to that of the session scope. For each traffic case in a session there is created a traffic case record to store executing objects. Like in the session record is used a name or TAG and a pointer PTR. The traffic case record is accordingly referenced from the session record. To store data objects belonging to the traffic case is consequently used a transaction record, TR, creating a table for the data objects at this traffic case level. Every user of a session or traffic case record has an own view object through which the stored executing objects or data objects may be accessed. Figure 6 demonstrates in greater detail the data flow through a session executing an originating call, OC. The data flow starts when some data is received by an access agent or the input agent. The received data is converted to an AXE internal representation. The converted data is then stored in the transaction record, TR. The data object is stored with a tag. The tag is an integer that is reserved for this particular data object. Other users, e.g. an Application Analysis, needing the data object can fetch it from the transaction record by means of the tag and by utilizing a transaction record view object, TR_View. The above example also illustrates when data is sent by the output agent to the other Half-Call via the telecorπmunication service protocol, TSP. Data is sent in a parameter which besides the data contains the tag which identifies it. As stated above a data object is stored in the transaction record (a synonym for transaction record is also call record) . The transaction record, TR, is as already stated always accessed via a view object. The view object gives the user a high level interface to TR, which will be further described below. Each data object that is stored in the transaction record is semantically identified by a name or key referred to as the TAG. The TAG is an integer, in an exemplifying embodiment a 16 bit word, which has been reserved for one particular data object. By using a dynamic storage such as the transaction record, where the data objects are stored with tags it will be possible to support a very flexible output mechanism. In other words it will be extremely easy, without influencing the general operation of the telecommu¬ nication system, to at any particular time period extract any chosen data objects on demand of the user for a later analysis. A consequence of this is that it will be extremely easy to add additional services into a system operating according to such a structured way of operation. Assume that the agent receive the parameter "calling party number" on the protocol, ACP. The data will be converted to an AXE internal representation and stored in the TR together with an dedicated tag, "AppCallingPartyNumberTag" . Other users of TR that needs the calling party number can then turn to the TR and ask for the data object that is stored with the TAG "AppCalling¬ PartyNumberTag" . An interface Application Platform Tags In¬ terface, ATI, contains the number of tags used by the functions. ATI also contains the rules to follow when new tags are reserved. As already mentioned the TR is always accessed via a view object. The view object has two main tasks. The first is to present a customized interface towards the TR. Each user of the TR should have a dedicated interface to the contents in the TR. The second task is to act as a handle object towards the TR, the handle ensures that TR is not removed until all handles are deleted. View objects are also used to access the contents of the other two types of record that exist, the session record and the traffic case record. As mentioned above one task of the view object is to provide the user with a customized interface on a high abstraction level towards a record. The customizing means that the interface gives the users access only to the objects needed to be accessed, which may be only a part of the total contents in a record. The second major task of the view objects towards the transaction record and the traffic case record is that they act a handles. As long as a record has a handle it can not be deleted. When the last handle towards a record is removed the record and all its content is also removed from the local memory storage. It is apparent that this creates a very convenient local memory storage management. The call record output mechanism already mentioned is used to output parts of the content of a transaction record for post¬ processing. It should be kept in mind that the contents of the session record and a traffic case record and a transaction record are existent only during the duration of that particular session and will disappear when the session is terminated. The output mechanism is built around a number of managed objects containing tag lists. In the operation of a telecommunication system there is for instance a need to collect charging data to be able to correctly bill the different subscribers. In Figure 7 is exemplified what may take place in a session. A control object "Charging" has opened an object Cro_Type. This particular Cro_Type object contains a Tag list, fetched from the data base, denoting the data objects to be extracted from the transaction record. Cro_Type is then ordered to compile a report consisting of the data objects identified by the tag list which is stored in the data base. The control object then uses the Cro_Type interface to order it to collect the data during the existence of the particular session. The data may be packed in a data area which then will be sent to a post-processing node. Consequently a charging basis due to increased services may be changed at any moment by simple modification of the tag list without interfering at all with the existing system having a structure according to the present invention. The effective result of this is that even if the contents of the different sessions are defined as local data, it is possible to simultaneously make use of desired parts of the content as if it constitutes global data. A difference between local and global data is for example that the latter by necessity has normally to be allocated in predetermined memory locations to be able to be accessed by other users. In the illustrative embodiment we use three types of managed objects to effectuate the flexible output mechanism described here. They are denoted as CroServiceTemplate, CroType and Cro- CustomerTemplate. The first managed object type, the CroService¬ Template is used for specification of what data objects are possible to extract for a specific basic or supplementary service. CroServiceTemplate contains one attribute, possible TAGs, denoting which data is possible to extract from the transaction record, TR, for a particular service, for example in this context a "Basic Call" or a "Three Party Call". The second managed object type is CroType, which is used for specification of a certain output type. Every instance of CroType is connected to one or more instances of CroServiceTemplate. The union of data in these CroServiceTemplates determines what data is possible to output for a specific CroType. The third and last management object type is CroCustomerTemplate, which is a managed object holding the information of which data to extract for a specific customer in a specific output type, CroType. Figure 8 demonstrates a small example having the conditions: - There are two customers, A and B. - There are two services, "Basic Call" and "Three Party Call". There are two CroTypes, CroType 1 and CroType 2. Because there are two services we need two CroServiceTemplates: CroServiceTemplate Basic Call, containing the Tags 1, 2, 5 and 8. - CroServiceTemplate Three Party Call, containing the Tags 1, 2, 6 and 9. This means that for the "Basic Call" we can output the data stored in TR having the Tags l, 2, 5, and 8, while for the service "Three Party Call" we may output the data stored under the Tags 1, 2, 6, and 9. We then define two output types, CroType 1 designed such that it will be able to output data related to both services and CroType 2 designed such that it will be able to output data related to the Basic Call. In Figure 8 is visualized the basic structure and the relation between the created managed object. One CroCustomerTemplate is required for each customer and CroType to make the output mechanism "Call Record Output", CRO, able to perform outputs of all CroTypes to all customers. This results in this example in a total of four CroCustomerTemplates. In Figure 9 is demonstrated the resulting structure. Customer A requires all possible Tags from CroType 1 and Tag no. 1 and 2 from CroType 2 and customer B requires all Tags with lower number than 8 from all CroTypes. We then have a final structure that the output mechanism CRO needs to make a proper distribution. We have specified which data fields all different customers need from all different CroTypes. A final part of the data flow in Figure 6 describes when the data shall be sent to the other Half-Call. The Half-Calls communicate by means of the Telecommunication Service Protocol, TSP. The TSP carries self-identifying parameters. A parameter contains a data object and is identified by a Tag, which in an illustrative embodiment may contain a number of bytes, e.g. 16 binary bits. The receiver can determine what data is received by looking at the Tag. The Tag which is used to identify a parameter on the TSP is the same Tag used to identify a data stored in TR. As mentioned already one way to structure the software in a call processing switching system for telephony is to divide the controll of the call into two halves. This is referred to as the half-call principle and means that each part of a call is controlled by its own software. By combining this with a suitable generic protocol between these call halves, it is possible to build up a system which is very easy to extend with new telephony applications. This structure is also demonstrated in Fig. 2. Now will be described a way, for example by means of object oriented programing, in which according to the present invention one of these call-halves can be structured to make it easy to join a call to an already established call, that is a multi-call, which for instance may be a 'Three Party Call' as discussed above. As already described a software and/or hardware that handles an object of one half-call is referred to as a session. The session is a dynamic process that is started up by a setup server (SUS) . A session has as already mentioned a master control part called a session controller (SC) and a storage structure called session record (SR) . In the session record references to all executing objects and data structures for the session are stored. This is illustrated also in Fig. 10. When a call is started a setup server (SUS) will receive a dialogue request on it's port agent. The setup server first checks that this request received is valid, i.e., that the destination is right. Then the setup server checks if a new session should be created or if an existing session may be joined (an existing session indicates that the called party already has an active call). Fig. 10 is indicating this situation. In the case when the called party has no active call the setup server along path 1 in Fig. 11 creates a new dynamic session for the called party. In this example a session protocol agent, PA-B in Fig. 11, is created at 2 to handle the protocol from the dialogue request. Then the control logic CL is started at 3a and 3b to take over the session. The control logic creates a data structure at 4 referred to as the session record, as previously discussed, to store information about the session before starting a protocol entry port at 5, in this case PEP-B to handle the received messages. To make it possible for another later call to join the session the control logic also at 6 starts another protocol entry port PEP-A. The dialogue request will now at 7 be transferred to the protocol agent PA-B which checks it before at 8 tranferring it to the control logic CL. The continuation depends on what the dialogue request contains and how the control logic should handle this and will be apparent for a person skilled in the art. One important point here is that the object PEP-A, the second entry port is created at this time. If it is not created at this point that must be done at a later stage as there is a risk of getting another request to the same subscriber. At a later time there is apparently a risk that another process by chance will be created parallel to the existing process. In that case it would be complicated to achieve the desired flexibility for joining the ongoing call, if possible at all. Thus the important thing is that the control logic CL by creating two protocol entry ports (PEP-B and PEP-A) enables another call to easily join this ongoing session. If the called party already has an active call, that is a session for this party already exists, when the setup server get another dialogue request 11 for this party the setup server will discover this and then try to join the existing session as illustrated in Fig. 12. The setup server first checks the database, i.e the session record, for the address to the available protocol entry port PEP-A and then at 12 transfers the dialogue request to this port. The protocol entry port PEP-A then creates a protocol agent PA-A at 13 and sends a message at 14 to the control logic CL that a message is coming on the created protocol agent PA-A. The dialogue request that now has been transferred from the setup server SUS-A to the protocol agent PA-A (at 16) will be sent to the control logic at 17 that starts handling the message. The continuation depends on what the dialogue request contains and how the control logic CL should handle this. The important thing here is that the setup server SUS-A can reach information on where the protocol entry port PEP-A is. Thi information is found in the session record SR. The setup server SUS-A and SUS-B have a common data area, possibly in a, generall local, database, where information about sessions are stored. If yet another dialogue request is coming to setup server SUS- for the same party as earlier, which already has two call active, the setup server will transfer the message to th protocol entry port PEP-A. The protocol entry port PEP-A wil then create a new protocol agent (a second PA-A) as describe earlier. This new request will NOT be transferred to the existin protocol agent PA-A because there are two different dialogue that should not be mixed. The structure thus described opens u a way to easily extend the session for multi-call service withou as a matter of fact interfering with the overhead telecommunica¬ tion switching system. Fig. 13 demonstrates a summary of a multi-call processing cas involving three subscribers. PA-A and PA-B here belong to tw different traffic cases but are handled by the same session an session controler SC. In one of the traffic cases subscriber B is the terminating call, while in the second traffic case subscribe C is an originating call. Because both these traffic cases ar handled by the same session it will be easy for the subscriber or B to be accessed by subscriber C which for example was tryin to call subscriber A or B alredy being busy in a communication. To summarize, for every new dialogue request that is reeived fo a specific party a new protocol agent will be created to handle the dialogue. All executing objects and data objects belonging to the particular session will be defined by its TAG in the sessio record and a respective pointer PTR will give an adress to the storing location in the memory. The advantages will be: O the disclosed method creates a standard and generic structure, common for all telecommunication applications, which makes it possible to extend with any number of calls to a specifi party; O the method creates a structure which is easy to extend with new dialogues (TSP dialogues) . This is done without effecting the base functions; O the method creates a structure which means that all handling of data and interactions for a specific party can be central¬ ized into one dynamic process,- and O from the characteristics point of view, performance and memory usage, this means that all coordination and data manipulation can be done in the dynamic process without using any inter¬ process communication. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications and changes may be made to the hardware/software according to the concept of the present invention without departure from the spirit and scope thereof, which is defined by the appended claims.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method to structure multi-call processing in a telecommuni¬ cation system, preferably by way of software, creating a standard and generic structure, which makes it possible to extend said system with new services and data without effecting an already existing main operating hardware and software of the system using the half-call principle, characterized in that in a process utilizing said half-call principle comprising a session including a session controler (SC) handling said half-call is created a first entry port (PEP-B) to handle the protocol from a dialogue request and simultaneously is also created a second entry port (PEP-A) to handle a second dialogue request, whereby it is ensured that said second dialogue request being directed to said second entry port incorporated in said session will be able to join an ongoing call if the party having the ongoing call accepts said second dialogue request. 2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that said dialogue request is received by a setup server, which directs the dialogue request to said session. 3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that said session uses a memory function in which different records are storing references in form of pointers to a local memory function, a pointer (PTR) being combined with a tag element (TAG) by means of which locally stored data will be uniquely identi¬ fied. 4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that said session uses a session record (SR) for storing references in form of pointers to executing objects and to data objects of the call and from which record it will be possible to locate all other objects within the session, if tag elements (TAG) under which objects are stored are known. 5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that session comprises a traffic case scope having a similar structure as said session scope and a traffic case record being referenced from said session record (SR) and said traffic case record being created to store references to executing objects of a call. 6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that a transaction record (TR) is storing data objects belonging to said traffic case. 7. The method according to any of claim 6, characterized in that said tag element (TAG) is being realized by an integer number uniquely assigned to each executing object or data object used. 8. A multi-call processing switching system for telephony, preferably by way of software and/or harware, creating a standard and generic structure, which makes it possible to extend said system with new services and data without effecting an already existing main operating hardware and software of the system using the half-call principle, characterized in that in a process utilizing said half-call principle comprising a session including a session controler (SC) handling said half-call is created a first entry port (PEP-B) to handle the protocol from a dialogue request and simultaneously is also created a second entry port (PEP-A) to handle a second dialogue request, whereby it is ensured that said second dialogue request being directed to said second entry port incorporated in said session will be able to join an ongoing call if the party having the ongoing call accepts said second dialogue request. 9. The system according to claim 8, characterized in that said dialogue request is received by a setup server (SUS) , which directs the request to said session. 10. The system according to claim 9, characterized in that said session uses a memory function in which different records are storing references in form of pointers to a local memory function, a pointer (PTR) being combined with a tag element (TAG) by means of which locally stored data will be uniquely identi¬ fied. 11. The system according to claim 10, characterized in that said session uses a session record (SR) for storing references in form of pointers to executing objects and data objects of the call and from which record it will be possible to locate all other objects within the session, if tag elements (TAG) under which objects are stored are known. 12. The system according to claim 11, characterized in that session comprises a traffic case scope having a similar structure as said session scope and a traffic case record being referenced from said session record (SR) and said traffic case record being created to store executing objects of a call. 13. The system according to claim 12, characterized in that a transaction record (TR) is storing data objects belonging to said traffic case. 14. The system according to any one of claim 13, characterized in that said tag element (TAG) is being realized by an integer number uniquely assigned to each executing object or data object used.

Inventors: KILHAGE PER ERIK MIKAEL, KULLSTROEM PER TOMAS, TELLINGER JAN ANDERS, KILHAGE, PER, ERIK, MIKAEL, KULLSTROEM, PER, TOMAS, TELLINGER, JAN, ANDERS
Applicants: ERICSSON TELEFON AB L M, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON
Application year: 1995
Main classification: H04M3
IPC codes: H04M3, H04Q3