Non-specific reaction suppressor for immunoassays

Abstract: A non-specific reaction suppressor for immunoassays having the formula: where R₁, R₂, Y, X, and R₃ are defined in the specification.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a non-specific reaction suppressor for immunoassays. More specifically, the present invention relates to secondary and tertiary amines which, when added to an immunoassay, improve the accuracy and reliability of the quantitative determination of the extent of immunoreactant-complementary immunoreactant interaction by significantly reducing or eliminating non-specific interactions. Discussion of the Background Immunoassays are techniques for the detection and/or quantitation of antigens, antibodies, etc. and are well known in the art. Immunoassays are described in the Handbook of Experimental Immunology , Vols. 1-4, Blackwell Scientific, incorporated herein by reference. U.S. Patents describing immunoassays include 4,203,724, 4,590,156, 4,716,123, 4,772,550, 4,851,329, 4,960,692 and 5,100,805. Non-labeled immunoassays have limited sensitivity since large antigen-antibody complexes must be formed for their detection. Examples of non-labeled reagent assays include immunoprecipitation methods, agglutination methods and light scattering techniques. Labeled reagent immunoassays include reagents labeled with radioisotopes, fluorophores, etc. Immunoassays are broadly divided into two general groups: reagent observed and analyte observed (see Ekins, R., Immunoassay for the Eighties , University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1981). In reagent observed immunoassays an analyte to be detected and a complementary immunoreactive species present in excess are brought together. Examples include sandwich assays, etc. In analyte observed immunoassays, the analyte to be determined is labeled and is present in excess. Radioimmunoassays (RIA) represent a form of this type of assay wherein the analyte is labeled with a radioisotope. Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) measure the immunoreactant-complementary immunoreactant (i.e., antigen-antibody) reaction using enzyme reaction measurements. Recently EIAs have experienced rapid growth in the clinical laboratory due, in part, to the lack of a need for radioisotopes. Current EIA methods include homogeneous assays which do not include a separation step (because signal modulation occurs following immunoreactant-complementary immunoreactant reaction). While immunoassays are generally classified on the basis of which immunoreactant (antigen or antibody) is determined, which reactant is labeled, whether competitive or non-competitive methods are used and which method of separation of bound and free reactants (if any) is used, all immunoassays rely, eventually, upon the formation of at least one immunoreactant-complementary immunoreactant complex. Immunoassays are designed to detect, monitor and/or quantitate this complex formation and, preferably, provide a means by which the amount of a target species in a given sample is determined. To effect complex formation, generally an immunoreactant is bound to the surface of a bead, plate, etc., which surface is then brought into contact with a solution of complementary immunoreactant. The immobilization of immunoreactants on solid supports is well known in the art and described in, e.g., Immobilized Affinity Ligand Techniques , by G.T. Hermanson, et al, 1992, and U.S. patents 4,203,724, 4,716,123, 4,772,550, 4,851,329, 4,960,692 and 5,100,805. While the sensitivity of immunoassays has made them popular techniques in the determination of analytes, immunoassays, in addition to the desired immunoreactant-complementary immunoreactant reaction described above, undergo non-specific reactions which interfere with the determination of an analyte's presence and/or concentration. These non-specific reactions are well known in the art and are described in, e.g., L.M. Boscato et al, Clin. Chem. , 32/8, 1986; H.C. Vaidya et al, Clin. Chem. , 38/9, 1992; and C. Chang et al, Clin. Chem., 33/6, 1987. Non-specific reactions may arise from non-analyte antibody-binding substances present in the sample being tested, from the interaction of labeled or non-labeled analyte with the solid immunoreactant support, etc. In the past, bovine serum albumin, etc. has been used to minimize non-specific interactions. However, non-specific reactions remain a problem in immunoassay techniques. GB-A-2 042 170 relates to a reagent for the latex agglutination reaction, which reagent contains one or more compounds having an amide-function. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION One object of the present invention is to provide a method for suppressing and eliminating non-specific reactions occurring in immunoassays. Another object of the present invention is to provide an analyte solution containing a non-specific immunoreaction suppressor. Another object of the present invention is to provide a composition comprising solvent, a non-specific reaction suppressor and a solid support having attached thereto an immunoreactant. Another object of the present invention is to provide a solid support having coated on the surface thereof an immunoreactant and a non-specific reaction suppressor. Another object of the present invention is to provide a diagnostic kit comprising a non-specific reaction suppressor and an immunoreactant. A more complete appreciation of the invention, its objects and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 shows the results of the agglutination immunoassay determination of digoxin in the absence of the invention non-specific reaction suppressor. Figure 2 shows the data distribution for the agglutination immunoassay determination of the same digoxin samples tested in Figure 1 in the presence of a non-specific reaction suppressor according to the invention. Figure 3 shows the effect of an invention non-specific reaction suppressor on a Hepatitis-b samples showing non-specific reactions. Figure 4 shows the reduction of non-specific reactions when a non-specific reaction suppressor according to the present invention is utilized in an immunoassay using human serum albumin coated microplates. Figure 5 shows the structure of 11 compounds used in Example 4 to determine non-specific reaction suppressing ability. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention is directed to secondary and tertiary amine non-specific reaction suppressors of the formula: wherein X is -NH-(CO)-NH-, -NH-(CS)-NH-, or -N=C=N-,. R 1 and R 2 , which may be the same or different, are C 1 -C 5 linear or branched alkyl groups, or R 1 and R 2 , together with nitrogen, is or the metho-p-toluenesulfonate salt thereof, Y, which may be the same or different, is any of H, OH and halogen (Br, Cℓ, F), R 3 is -NR 1 R 2 , -NH 2 , -CHY, cyclohexyl, or H, m is an integer of from 0 to 5, p is an integer of from 0 to 5, and n is 0 or 1, provided that at least one of m and p is at least 1 when n equals 1, and provided that when m=n=p=0, R 3 is H or -CH 2 Y, and the acid addition salts thereof, particularly the HCℓ salts, phosphoric acid salts and sulfuric acid salts thereof. These secondary and tertiary amines may be substituted on any or all of the m and p methylenes with any combination of H, OH and halogen, include compounds where m=n=p=0 and R 3 is, e.g., H or methyl, compounds where m, optionally n and optionally p are not 0 and R 3 is H or - CH 2 Y, etc. Several of the above-described compounds are the hydrolysis products of carbodiimides useful in the preparation of peptides. See Sheehan, J.C., et al, J. Org. Chem., 26, 2525, 1961 and Staros, J.V., et al, Anal. Biochem. , 156, 220, 1986. One particularly preferred non-specific reaction suppressor is 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)urea (EDU), i.e., a compound according to the formula above where R 1 = R 2 = methyl, Y = H, m = 3, n = 1, p = 1 and R 3 = methyl. Another is 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinoethyl) carbodiimide metho-p-toluenesulfonate (CMC). These compounds and their hydrolysis products are useful for suppressing non-specific reactions in immunoassays, particularly immunoassays wherein an immunoreactant is attached covalently or by adsorption to a solid support. The invention non-specific reaction suppressors are generally commercially available and prepared by simple organic reactions well known to those of ordinary skill in this art and explained in, e.g., Introduction to Organic Chemistry, A. Streitwieser and C. Heathcock, Macmillan, 1976; Reagents for Organic Synthesis, Feiser and Fieser, John Wiley and Sons, 1967 and succeeding volumes; Survey of Organic Syntheses, John Wiley and Sons, Vols I and II, 1970; and Advanced Organic Chemistry, March, Wiley, 1985. For example, the urea compounds (-NH-CO-NH-) can be prepared by hydrolysis of the carbodiminde (-N=C=N-) compounds. The non-specific reaction suppressor of the present invention described by the above formula may be used singly or in combination and may be added to the sample to be tested (i.e., analyte) or to the known immunoreactant optionally adsorbed or covalently bound to a solid support. Further, the non-specific reaction suppressor can be utilized in combination with conventional non-specific reaction suppressors such as bovine serum albumin. A particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention is one where a compound according to the above formula is used to suppress non-specific immunoassay reactions in which an immunoreactant has first been bound to a substrate using a carbodiimide reagent such as 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) or CMC. A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is one where the non-specific reaction suppressor utilized is the hydrolysis product of the carbodiimide used in the binding of the immunoreactant to the solid support. The amount of non-specific reaction suppressor useful for suppressing non-specific immunoassay reactions according to the invention is from 0.1 to 300 mM, preferably 0.5 to 50 mM, more preferably 1.25 to 25 mM based on the total immunoassay solution volume, the solution volume of a sample to be tested, or the solution volume of a solid support sensitized with immunoreactant suspended in a solvent. The non-specific reaction suppressor of the present invention is added to either or both of the immunoreactant and the analyte being determined prior to complex formation and, when added to an immunoreactant adsorbed or covalently bound to a solid support is preferably allowed to incubate for 1-20 min. before effecting immunoreaction. In the present invention the immunoreactant means any antigen or antibody optionally covalently, etc., attached to other molecules such as proteins or synthetic or natural polymers, etc. and the complementary immunoreactant means any antibody or antigen optionally covalently, etc., attached to other molecules such as synthetic or natural polymers, etc. capable of specifically binding to the immunoreactant. Generally, the immunoreactant is the species being sought out or quantified and the complementary immunoreactant is the known species used to find or quantify the immunoreactant. Certain immunoassays, etc. may not require such an arrangement, however. Examples of immunoreactants and complementary immunoreactants include the following: AFP Alpha-fetoprotein Beta-2-microglogulin CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen Ferritin CA 19-9 Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 PAP Prostatic acid phosphatase PSA Prostate-specific antigen CRP C-reactive protein Mb Myoglobin RF Rheumatoid factor ASO Anti-streptolysin-O FDP Fibrin degradation product Anti-thrombin-III Plasminogen Alpha-2-plasmin inhibitor D-dimer Fibrin degradation product D-fragment dimer IgG Immunoglobulin G IgA Immunoglobulin A IgM Immunoglobulin M IgE Immunoglobulin E C3 Complement 3 C4 Complement 4 Urinary albumin hCG human chorionic gonadotropin hPL Human placental lactogen Insulin HBs antigen Hepatitis-B surface antigen HBs antibody Anti-hepatitis-B core antigen antibodies HBc antibody Anti-hepatitis-B core antigen antibodies HCV antibody Anti-hepatitis-C virus antibodies Treponema Anti-treponema pallidum antibodies TSH Thyroid stimulating hormone LH Lutenizing hormone FSH Follicle stimulating hormone Digoxin Digitoxin Quinidine Procainamide NAPA N-acetyl procainamide Theophylline Phenytoin Phenobarbital Carbamazepine Valproic acid Ethosuccimide Gentamicin Tobramycin Amikacin Vancomycin Cyclosporin-A B12 Vitamin B12 Folic acid T3 Triiodothyronine T4 Thyroxine Estrogen The immunoreactant, complementary immunoreactant, either, both, or neither may be adsorbed or covalently bound to a solid support and, in fact, all of the above-identified species can be called either an immunoreactant or a complementary immunoreactant depending on their role in the immunoassay. Pairing is important, the name is not, and where only an immunoreactant is referred to herein any of the above species and similar known species are meant. Naturally, all immunoreactants complimentary to those listed above are included in the present invention. Solid supports, etc., bearing immunoreactants on their surfaces, etc., are described as sensitized solid supports. If no solid support is used, a solution containing a known immunoreactant is described as a sensitized solution. All immunoassays currently known can be improved by use of the above-described non-specific reaction suppressor. In particular, immunoagglutination assays such as hemagglutination or latex agglutination tests, adsorption onto the solid phase immunoassays or labeled antigen/antibody solid phase immunoassays like radioimmunoassays (RIAs), enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and fluorescent immunoassays (FIAs), etc. are improved through the use of the invention non-specific reaction suppressor. Other useful immunoassays include chemiluminescent assays, immunochromatography, immunosensing, immuno-diffraction grating, etc. The following examples illustrate the invention. However, it is to be understood that these examples in no way limit the invention. EXAMPLE 1 Digoxin microparticle reagent preparation A digoxin particle reagent is prepared from digoxin-human serum albumin (digoxin-HSA) conjugate according to the method of T.W. Smith et al. in Biochemistry, 9, 331 (1970). The digoxin reagent is coupled to carboxylate-modified latex particles having a 0.292 µm diameter, by first subjecting the latex particles to ion exchange in a mixed-bed ion exchange resin (Bio Rad AG 501-X8) with stirring for two hours at room temperature. After ion exchange the latex particles are filtered and ready for coupling. To a 50 ml polycarbonate centrifuge tube is added 50 ml of 0.1 M bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.0 and 5 ml of a 10 wt.% latex particle suspension of the particles described above. The particles are incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes with stirring prior to reaction. Then, 5 ml of 88 mg/ml 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) freshly dissolved in water is added to the mixture and allowed to stand for 10 minutes. Thereafter, 2.5 ml of the 10 mg/ml digoxin-HSA conjugate is added thereto with vigorous stirring and incubated for 10 minutes. Coupling is stopped by adding 5 ml of 500 mM glycine buffer, pH 8.5. Another 10 minute incubation is done to ensure complete termination of reaction. The digoxin-HSA conjugate coupled latex is centrifuged at 26000 x g for 20 minutes. The supernatant is discarded, and to the pellet is added 25 ml of water. The pellet is resuspended with vigorous stirring. washing is repeated four times, and, in the last resuspension washing step, 0.05% sodium azide solution is used as storage medium. Finally, the latex suspension is sonicated and diluted to the concentration (normally 0.1 - 0.4 wt.%) desired for use. Anti-digoxin antibody buffer reagent composition EDU solution was prepared by dissolving 2 M of EDC into water, followed by hydrolysis, and added to the reagent described below in the listed amount after hydrolysis was confirmed. An anti-digoxin antibody reagent is prepared by dissolving the following materials in water and adjusting the pH with hydrochloric acid. 3.68% NaCl 200mM Tris-(hydroxy)-aminomethane, pH 7.5 1.2% Sodium dextransulfate 8.0% Choline chloride 25 mM EDU 1 mg/ml HSA (human serum albumin) 0.05% Sodium azide 1:120,000 Diluted anti-digoxin monoclonal antibody (obtained from Beckman (preferably added last.) Assay conditions for sample evaluation An LPIA-100 instrument (an immunoassay analyzer measuring turbidity as a function of time, made by Mitsubishi Kasei Corporation) was used for the test in the condition stated below. First, a calibration curve was established using calibrators having 0, 1, 2, 3 and 5 ng/ml of Digoxin (Roche Diagnostic Systems). 200 digoxin serum samples which had already been evaluated by radioimmunoassay (RIA, Dinabbott Corp., Japan) and determined to have concentrations from about 0 to 3 ng/ml were then evaluated with the LPIA-100 instrument, and the rate data from the LPIA instrument was plotted versus the known (by RIA) digoxin concentration both with and without EDU (25mM) in solution, and this plot was compared to the calibration curve. Wavelength 650 nm Sample volume 10 µl Pushing buffer 50 µl Antibody reagent 200 µl Latex reagent 40 µl Results of the tests As is seen in Figures 1a-e and 2a-e, by comparing 1a to 2a, 1b to 2b, etc. the addition of EDU resulted in a dramatic improvement on the LPIA-100 data distribution; the sample data distribution became much more accurate and reliable in the presence of EDU. In particular, severe outliers were eliminated and sample accuracy and reliability were improved. The five graphs a-e are used to represent 200 points - 40 points per graph - each point assigned at random to better show all the data and avoid overlap. EXAMPLE 2 In order to show that the non-specific reaction suppressors of the invention do not effect, or effect only slightly, specific immunoreactant-complimentary immunoreactant reactions while eliminating or reducing non-specific reactions, the following experiment was carried out. Preparation of anti-HBs antibody F(ab') 2 coated latex particle reagent The IgG fraction of anti-hepatitis-B surface antigen (HBs) antibody was digested with pepsin, then purified by Sephacryl® S-200 gel filtration column chromatography to provide the F(ab') 2 fragment of the antibody. The F(ab') 2 was mixed with polystyrene latex particles in 0.1M Tris buffer, pH 8, then the mixture was centrifuged, and the supernatant was replaced with bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution to stabilize the particles. Following several wash cycles by centrifugation, the particle pellet was finally resuspended and sonicated in storage medium, and, then, was ready for use as an anti-HBs antibody latex particle reagent. Assay conditions for sample evaluation The above particles were evaluated according to the following experiments using the LPIA-100 instrument as in EXAMPLE 1, except that Tris-saline buffer solution (pH 8.2) was used instead of antibody reagent and the wavelength used was 950 nm. Experiments 1. Screening of non-specific agglutination samples. Several normal serum specimens which were independently confirmed to be negative with HBs antigen by RIA were tested by LPIA without EDU, and the samples showing non-specific reaction (i.e. samples showing false positive results; samples 2, 8, 11 and 14) were selected. The selected false positive samples (i.e., samples with non-specific interactions) were then reanalyzed checked after incubation in the presence of 0, 50, and 100 mM EDU by LPIA. Figure 3 shows the results. Finally, the effect of EDU on immunoassay reactivity was checked with HBs surface antigen calibration standards in order to determine whether EDU was specific against non-specific reactions or whether it simply decreased reagent reactivity. Samples with known amounts of HBs surface antigen and with different concentrations of EDU were tested against a calibration curve made with no EDU. Even in the case of 100 mM EDU, only a 15% reactivity drop was noted. Based on the above experiments it is clear that EDU has a strong preventive effect against non-specific agglutination and does not effect, or effects to only a minor extent, specific immunoreactant-complimentary immoreactant interactions. EXAMPLE 3 Preparation of a human serum albumin (HSA) coated microplate A carboxylate modified microplate (Sumitomo Bakelite) was sensitized with HSA using EDC by methods known in the art. Assay system to evaluate the effect of added EDU Six outliers showing non-specific reactions taken from the digoxin non-specific reaction screening (no added EDU) described in EXAMPLE 1 (samples 5, 7, 18, 38, 46 and 65) and two normal (non-outlier) samples (NC1 and NC2) were tested as follows: 30 fold diluted serum samples were incubated with the microplate for 60 minutes. After several washes, 3000 fold diluted rabbit anti-human immunoglobulins antibody was reacted with the plate for 60 minutes. Again the plate was washed several times, then alkaline phosphatase-labeled goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin was reacted in the plate for 60 minutes. After the final wash, a solution of color generating substrate for alkaline phosphatase was added into the plate, and the existence and amount of human immunoglobulins was detected according to the intensity of the color. The effect of EDU addition was tested by diluting samples with a diluent containing 50 mM EDU. Results As is seen in Figure 4, the addition of EDU significantly reduced the relatively high immunoglobulin attachment to the microplate in the case of the outliers (non-specific reaction samples). The normal samples showed reduced immunoglobulin binding without EDU and did not change much in the presence of EDU. Thus, the presence of EDU significantly reduces the non-specific binding of immunoglobulin on a solid plate support, decreasing false positive results. Thus, the effectiveness of the invention materials on e.g., microplate enzyme immunoassays, etc. is demonstrated. EXAMPLE 4 The eleven compounds shown in Figure 5 were added to three samples (HR1, HR2 and HR3) showing non-specific reactions (i.e., outliers from Example 1) and tested on the LPIA-100 system as in Example 1. Table 1 shows the results. The numbers in the Table show relative reactivity as % values, where 100% corresponds to the expected reactivity based on the calibration curves shown in Figures 1 and 2. From the results in Table 1, it is clear that the secondary and tertiary amines according to the invention decrease non-specific reactions whereas primary amines behave much more poorly. EDU HR1 HR2 HR3 OmM 159.0 148.5 110.3 2.5mM 138.2 132.4 107.6 5mH 119.1 120.4 108.0 10mM 105.6 110.8 106.9 20mM 95.3 100.0 104.8 Dimethylamine HR1 HR2 HR3 OmM 159.0 148.5 110.3 1.25mM 130.7 128.5 107.5 2.5mM 125.1 122.9 106.0 5mM 126.7 118.8 103.5 10mM 133.8 123.0 106.8 20mM 134.9 121.3 108.8 Diethylamine HR1 HR2 HR3 OmM 159.0 148.5 110.3 1.25mM 132.5 130.0 107.5 2.5mM 123.7 123.9 105.5 5mM 128.3 120.7 105.6 10mM 130.9 119.9 105.5 20mM 135.3 119.0 106.9 Dipropylamine HR1 HR2 HR3 OmM 159.0 148.5 110.3 1.25mM 134.2 133.3 109.9 2.5mM 122.4 127.6 104.6 5mM 123.3 125.8 105.7 10mM 125.9 128.6 105.2 20mM 135.7 130.9 106.9 Dimethylethylamine HR1 HR2 HR3 OmM 159.0 148.5 110.3 1.25mM 136.4 125.9 111.4 2.5mM 122.8 118.2 106.9 5mM 109.5 111.0 106.4 10mM 105.5 108.3 108.3 20mM 99.6 104.4 108.4 Dimethylaminopropylamine HR1 HR2 HR3 OmM 159.0 148.5 110.3 1.25mM 128.8 123.5 104.9 2.5mM 131.2 126.1 104.8 5mM 129.3 124.4 106.6 10mM 123.6 121.5 110.0 20mM 111.6 111.3 107.8 Diethylaminopropylamine HR1 HR2 HR3 OmM 159.0 148.5 110.3 1.25mM 137.3 133.0 108.9 2.5mM 132.9 127.2 107.0 5mM 135.5 122.4 106.7 10mM 128.4 127.3 110.3 20mM 118.6 123.1 118.3 Dimethylaminopropylchloride HR1 HR2 HR3 OmM 159.0 143.5 110.3 1.25mM 129.2 125.2 106.3 2.5mM 122.5 119.2 102.0 5mM 111.9 112.1 105.1 10mM 103.2 102.8 102.5 20mM 92.5 88.9 88.7 Bis-dimethylamino-propanol HR1 HR2 HR3 OmM 159.0 148.5 110.3 1.25mM 175.5 159.5 115.9 2.5mM 163.3 150.6 109.3 5mM 160.6 145.1 112.2 10mM 142.7 131.4 116.4 20mM 126.0 118.8 117.6 Diaminopropane HR1 HR2 HR3 OmM 159.0 148.5 110.3 1.25mM 1.25mM 183.9 183.9 172.9 172.9 111.4 111.4 2.5mM 184.8 170.2 110.7 5mM 194.7 177.0 109.6 10mM 235.1 206.9 112.9 20mM 351.8 273.2 110.6 Diaminopropanol HR1 HR2 HR3 OmM 159.0 148.5 110.3 1.25mM 177.1 170.0 112.1 2.5mM 172.9 165.2 107.9 5mM 188.7 173.9 108.2 10mM 20mM Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.

Claims: A composition comprising a solid support sensitized with an immunoreactant and a non-specific reaction suppressor of the formula: wherein X is -NH-(CO)-NH-, -NH-(CS)-NH-, or -N=C=N-, R 1 and R 2 , which may be the same or different, are C 1 -C 5 linear or branched alkyl groups, or R 1 and R 2 , together with nitrogen, is or the metho-p-toluenesulfonate salt thereof, Y, which may be the same or different, is any of H, OH and halogen, R 3 is -NR 1 R 2 , -NH 2 , -CHY, cyclohexyl, or H, m is an integer of from 0 to 5, p is an integer of from 0 to 5, and n is 0 or 1, provided that at least one of m and p is at least 1 when n equals 1, and provided that when m=n=p=0, R 3 is H or -CH 2 Y, and the acid addition salts thereof. The composition of Claim 1, further comprising an aqueous solvent. The composition of Claim 1, further comprising a complementary immunoreactant which specifically binds with said immunoreactant. The composition of Claim 2, wherein said non-specific reaction suppressor is present in from 0.1 to 300 mM based on the volume of aqueous solvent. The composition of Claim 1 wherein said solid support is a latex particle, said immunoreactant is coupled to said latex particle with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide, and said non-specific reaction suppressor is 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl-aminopropyl)urea. The composition of Claim 1 wherein said non-specific reaction suppressor is 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)urea or 1-cyclohexyl-3-3(2-morpholinoethyl)urea metho-p-toluenesulfonate. The composition of Claim 1, wherein the non-specific reaction suppressor is selected from the group consisting of dimethylamine, diethylamine, dipropylamine, N,N-dimethylethylamine, 3-dimethylaminopropylamine, 3-diethylaminopropylamine, dimethylaminopropylchloride, and 1,3-bis(dimethylamino)-2-propanol. A kit comprising first and second container means, said first container means containing a solid support sensitized with an immunoreactant, said second container means containing a non-specific reaction suppressor of the formula: wherein X is -NH-(CO)-NH-, -NH-(CS)-NH-, or -N=C=N-, R 1 and R 2 , which may be the same or different, are C 1 -C 5 linear or branched alkyl groups, or R 1 and R 2 , together with nitrogen, is or the metho-p-toluenesulfonate salt thereof, Y, which may be the same or different, is any of H, OH and halogen, R 3 is -NR 1 R 2 , -NH 2 , -CHY, cyclohexyl, or H, m is an integer of from 0 to 5, p is an integer of from 0 to 5, and n is 0 or 1, provided that at least one of m and p is at least 1 when n equals 1, and provided that when m=n=p=0, R 3 is H or -CH 2 Y, and the acid addition salts thereof. An immunoassay method comprising the step of adding a non-specific reaction suppressor of the formula: to a sample to be tested, to a solid support sensitized with an immunoreactant or to both a sample to be tested and a solid support sensitized with an immunoreactant, wherein X is -NH-(CO)-NH-, -NH-(CS)-NH-, or -N=C=N-, R 1 and R 2 , which may be the same or different, are C 1 -C 5 linear or branched alkyl groups, or R 1 and R 2 , together with nitrogen, is or the metho-p-toluenesulfonate salt thereof, Y, which may be the same or different, is any of H, OH and halogen (Br, Cℓ, F), R 3 is -NR 1 R 2 , -NH 2 , -CHY, cyclohexyl, or H, m is an integer of from 0 to 5, p is an integer of from 0 to 5, and n is 0 or 1, provided that at least one of m and p is at least 1 when n equals 1, and provided that when m=n=p=0, R 3 is H or -CH 2 Y, and the acid addition salts thereof. The method of Claim 9, wherein said immunoassay method is an agglutination assay. The method of Claim 10, wherein said non-specific reaction suppressor is 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)urea. The method of Claim 9, wherein said non-specific reaction suppressor is selected from the group consisting of dimethylamine, diethylamine, dipropylamine, N,N-dimethylethylamine, 3-dimethylaminopropylamine, 3-diethylaminopropylamine, dimethylaminopropylchloride, and 1,3-bis(dimethylamino)-2-propanol.

Inventors: ITO MICHIO, SUGAWA SATOSHI, YANAGIDA ATSUSHI, ITO, MICHIO, SUGAWA, SATOSHI, YANAGIDA, ATSUSHI, ITO, MICHIO, C/O MITSUBISHI CHEMICAL CORP., SUGAWA, SATOSHI, C/O MITSUBISHI CHEMICAL CORP.
Applicants: SERADYN INC, SERADYN, INC.
Application year: 1995
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: G01N33