A PROCESS FOR PRODUCING POLYPEPTIDES WITH REDUCED ALLERGENICITY

Abstract: The invention relates to a process for producing polypeptides with reduced allergenicity, by a) fermenting a microorganism capable of producing said polypeptide, b) recovering said polypeptide in substantially pure form, wherein said microorganism is modified in a manner whereby the expressed polypeptide molecules self-oligomerize. Further contemplated are a DNA construct comprising genes encoding such polypeptides, a recombinant expression vector or transformation vehicle comprising said DNA construct, a cell harbouring said DNA construct or vector. Further microbially produced polypeptides with reduced allergenicity produced according to the process of the invention and compositions comprising said polypeptides. Finally the invention relates to the use of Zipper domains for reducing allergenicity of polypeptides.

Description: Title: A process for produc i ng pol ypept i des wi th reduced a l l ergen i c i ty FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to a process for producing polypeptides with reduced allergenicity. Further to a DNA construct compri¬ sing genes encoding such polypeptides, a recombinant expression vector or transformation vehicle comprising said DNA construct, a cell harbouring said DNA construct or vector. Also contempla¬ ted is polypeptides with reduced allergenicity produced accor¬ ding to the process of the invention, oligomeric polypeptides with reduced allergenicity, and compositions comprising said polypeptides. Finally the invention relates to the use of Zipper domains for reducing the allergenicity of polypeptides. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION An increasing number of polypeptides, including enzymes and non-enzymatic proteins, are being produced industrially for use in industry, household, food/feed, cosmetics, medicine etc. Being polypeptides they are capable of stimulating the immune systems of animals and humans. Allergenicity of polypeptides Generally, most humans are not exposed to polypeptides to a degree that will generate adverse effects, but certain risk groups exist for which these phenomena are of significant importance. These risk groups include employees handling the manufacturing products comprising enzymes and professions such as hair¬ dressers which are daily in direct contact with products comprising polypeptides. For such risk groups certain polypeptides can elicit the pro¬ duction of different kinds of antibodies and/or give a cellular response. At least one of these routes can give adverse effects in humans and animals, as exposure to polypeptides may result in sensitisation and subsequently allergy. While sensitisation is defined as an immune status, allergy is characterized as a clinical disease. Allergy in general requi¬ res two or more encounters with antigens. The first exposure lead to a primary immune response which results in sensitisa¬ tion of the individual. If the sensitised individual comes in contact with the same antigen again it may provoke an allergic response. More specifically, IgE (or comparable molecules) attach to spe¬ cific receptors on the surface of mast cells, which contain many large cytoplasmic granules packed with chemical mediators. Once attached to a mast cell, the IgE molecule can survive for many weeks with its antibody reaction site, available to inter¬ act with a specific allergen. Individuals having IgE-mediated allergy have many IgE antibo¬ dies fixed to mast cells. Upon exposure the specific allergen molecules readily combines with the cell-fixed corresponding IgE antibodies. This leads to cellular release of the cytoplas¬ mic granules of chemical mediators, which gives symptoms like rhinitis, conjunctivitis, uricaria or other allergic reactions. Such allergic responses occur within minutes or a few hours after exposure to an allergen, and are often referred to as "immediate hypersensitivity reactions". IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction may occur when the allergen is introduced via the respiratory tract by inhalation. The occurrence of allergic responses is believed at least partly to depend on the way of exposure. For instance, it have been found that intranasal challenge with allergenic proteins provokes an allergic response even though skin tests and radioallergosorbent test (RAST) for specific serum IgE are negative (Ivan Roitt, "Essential Immunology", fifth edition, p. 152 and p. 240, 1984) . Reduction of allerσenicitv of polypeptides In general prior art methods for reducing the allergenicity of polypeptides consist of various ways of immobilizing, granulat¬ ing, coating or dissolving the polypeptides to avoid especially polypeptides in dust form from stimulating the immune system. There will anyhow still be a risk of having polypeptide dust or dissolved polypeptide in aerosol form. Therefore some release of polypeptides can occur leading to a possible sensitisation and subsequent allergic response. Another way of diminishing the problem has been to select po¬ lypeptides of human origin for production, e.g. in bacteria or mammalian cell cultures. This may alleviate some problems for humans, but not for animals. Furthermore, it will in many cases not be possible to find polypeptides of human origin with the desired properties, for which reason other origin has to be considered. This can be either human polypeptides that are altered in one or more positions in the molecule, giving performance that is desired. It might also be molecules from other species, including bacteria, mold etc. All the latter groups of products will have potency for immune stimulation. A further proposition for decreasing allergenicity has been to reduce the size of the polypeptide molecules (see e .g. JP Patent Publication No. 4112753, or Research Disclosure No. 335102) . This is, however, a solution that is only available when the activity of the polypeptide is without importance, or in such rare cases, where the activity of the polypeptide in question is retained in spite of a breakdown of the polypep- tide. The use of protein engineering has been suggested to reduce the allergenicity of polypeptides through epitope mapping and sub- sequent change of the allergenic epitopes (see WO 92/10755 (Novo Nordisk A/S) . In the medicinal field suggestions have been made of diminish- ing the antigenicity or immunogenicity of polypeptides through the attachment of one or more polymeric molecules to the poly¬ peptide. This usually has the effect of interfering with the interactions of the polypeptide with other macromolecular structures. Such a conjugate may also exhibit novel properties: e.g. EP 38 154 (Beecham Group Ltd.) discloses conjugates of allergens with polysarcosine which have immunosuppressive properties. US patent no. 4,179,337 (Enzon) concerns non-immunogenic poly¬ peptides, such as enzymes and peptide hormones coupled to poly¬ ethylene glycol (PEG) or polypropylene glycol. Between 10 and 100 moles of polymer are used per mole polypeptide and at least 15% of the physiological activity is maintained. The protected polypeptide is injected in an aqueous solution either into the mammalian circulatory system or intramuscularly. The non-immu¬ nogenicity is assessed from intradermal injection tests. It has been found that the attachment of one or more polymeric molecules to a polypeptide molecule in general has the effect of reducing the activity of e.g. the enzyme or interfering with the interaction between the enzyme and its substrate. EP 183 503 (Beecham Group PLC) discloses a development of the above concept by providing conjugates comprising pharmaceuti¬ cally useful polypeptides linked to at least one water-soluble polymer by means of a reversible linking group. EP 471 125 (Kanebo, LTD.) describes a modified protease linked to a polysaccharide via a triazine ring leading to a suppres¬ sing effect on antigenicity and dermal hypersensitivity. The employed polysaccharide has an average molecular weight not less than 10,000. The modification rate for surface a ino acid groups in the modified protease is not less that 30%. In general it is believed that allergens, entering the respi¬ ratory tract, must have a molecular weight lower than about 100 kDa in order to penetrate the plasma membrane and cause aller¬ gic reactions. WO 94/10191 (Novo Nordisk A/S) discloses a process for produc¬ tion of low allergenic protein, wherein the monomeric parent protein molecules are linked together to form an oligomer. This is done e.g. by using a linker or spacer molecule or by linking the monomeric molecules together by peptide bonds between the C-terminal of the first monomer and the N-terminal of the se¬ cond monomer. Folkeson et al., Acta Physiol. Scand, 139, p. 437-354, 1990, showed that there is an inverse relationship between the molecular weight of an instilled protein marker and the transferred amount (bioavaibility) via the respiratory tract to the blood stream. EP 215 662 (Masda, Hiroshi) concerns a modified or unmodified protease derived from microorganisms for use in medicaments such as anti-tumour agent. The modification of the protease may be carried out by forming dimers or oligomers by cross-linking the protease molecules. Enlargement of polypeptides bv the use of Zipper domains As can be seen from the above different techniques of enlarging polypeptides have been known for some time. "Zipper technique" Another technique which may be referred to as "Zipper tech- nique" is known to cause oligomerization of polypeptides. Zipper technique makes it possible to link polypeptide molecu¬ les to each other by means of self-oligomerizing polypeptide domains (in the following referred to as Zipper domains) . Examples of such Zipper domains include the well-known α-heli¬ cal bundles, crossed bundles, multiple bundles, parallel coiled coils, poly(L-glutamine) strands. The simplest cases of Zipper domains include the helical bundles which consist of amphiphilic helices, e.g. Leucine Zippers and four α-helical bundles. These domains share a characteristic seven-amino acid repeat of the type (a,b,c,d,e,f,g)„. Positions "a" and "d" of the heptad repeat are generally hydrophobic, a property which signals the potential for the interlocking of α-helices, as suggested by Crick (Acta crystallogr. , 6, p. 689-697, 1953). Despite the common pattern different sequences form two-, three, four-stranded and even higher order stranded helical bundles (Cohen et. al., TIBS, 11, 245-248, 1986; Cohen, Proteins, vol. 7, p. 1-15, 1990; Cohen, Science 263, p. 488- 489, 1994; O'Shea et al., Cell, 68, p. 699-708, 1992; O'Shea et al., Science, 254, p. 539-545, 1991; O'Shea et al. Science, 243, p. 538-542, 1989; Eisenberg et al.. Proteins, 1, p.16-22, 1986; Ho et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc, 109, p. 6751-6758, 1987). An example of a Leucine Zipper is the 33 amino acid sequence located at the C-terminus of GCN4, a yeast transcription factor, which belongs to a class of DNA binding polypeptides (O'Shea et al. Science, 243, p. 538-542, 1989). Through genetic engineering the specific GCN4 Leucine Zipper has been fused to different polypeptides and shown to mediate dimerization of monomeric polypeptides. Hu et al., Science, Vol. 250, p. 1400-1403, 1990, describes a genetic system where a GCN4 Leucine Zipper is fused to the N- terminal domain of bacteriophage λ repressor and used as a reporter for dimerization. Blondel and Bedouelle (Protein Engineering, 4, p. 457-461, 1991) dimerized a maltose binding protein (MalE) in E. coli . In general Leucine Zippers form homo-dimers, but within the group of Leucine Zippers there are specific motifs which favour the formation of hetero-di ers. Two examples of such are the Fos and Jun Leucine Zipper (O'Shea et al. Science, 245, p. 646, 1989; Turner and Tjian, Science, 243 p. 1689, 1989) and the artificially made hetero di eric coiled coil described by O'Shea (Current Biology, vol. 3, no 10, p. 658-667, 1993). Also the above mentioned self-oligomerizing four α-helical bundles have been shown to dimerize with a murine ScFv antibody fragment expressed in E. coli . The antibody fragment is fused to polypeptide motifs (see figure 7) of two identical helices from antiparallel four helical bundle designed by Eisenberg et al., supra. 1986 and Ho et al., supra. 1987, in which the two helices are separated by a turn. The four helix bundle was formed from two molecules each contributing two helices (Pack et al. Bio/Technology, vol. 11, p. 1271-1277, 1993). Concerning Zipper domains resulting in higher order oligomeri- zation, Lovejoy et al., Science, 259, p. 1288, 1993, reported the synthesis of a triple stranded α-helix bundle in which the helices run up-up-down. This construct was made by introducing specific mutations in the otherwise dimerized GCN4 Leucine Zipper. Incorporation of glutamine repeats (poly(L-glutamine) also makes proteins oligomerize to form polar Zippers (Stott et al., (1995) , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92 (14), p. 6509-6513. Another polypeptide motif which can mediate trimerization is the naturally occurring motif of the shock transcription factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluveromyces lactis described by Peteranderl et al. Biochemistry, 31, p. 12272-12276, 1992. Examples of tetrameric formation involves altering amino acid residues in the GCN4 Leucine Zipper (Harbury et al.. Science, 262, p. 1401-1407, 1993. This was only shown for small peptid- es. An oligomerization motif from myosin fused to recombinant pro¬ tein can mediate the formation of higher order polypeptide oligomers (Wolber et al., BIO/TECHNOLOGY, 10, p. 900-904, 1992) . The expressed fusion polypeptide forms oligomers at low salt concentration and dissociates at high salt concentrations. Discussion of prior art All the previously described methods for reducing the aller¬ genicity of polypeptides involve at least one additional production step in comparison to the production of the corre¬ sponding parent polypeptides. This makes the processes cumber¬ some and raises the cost of producing polypeptides with reduced allergenicity. Prior art only describes Zipper domains as means for oligomeri- zing polypeptides. It would be desirable to be able to reduce the allergenicity of polypeptides by increasing the size of the polypeptides as an integrated part of the polypeptide production process. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is the object of the invention to provide an integrated industrial applicable process for producing polypeptides with reduced allergenicity. The present inventors have perceived the potential of using Zipper domains for industrial uses, and have now surprisingly accomplished to provide a process for producing a polypeptide with reduced allergenicity, by a) fermenting a microorganism capable of producing said polypeptide, and b) recovering said polypeptide in substantially pure form, wherein said microorganism is modified in a manner whereby the expressed polypeptide molecules self-oligomerize. In an embodiment of the invention said microorganism has been modified by the introduction of one or more DNA constructs comprising a DNA sequence coding for at least one polypeptide and at least one Zipper domain. Another object of the invention is to provide a DNA construct for the production of polypeptides with reduced allergenicity, comprising a DNA sequence encoding at least one polypeptide molecule with at least one Zipper domain. The invention also relates to a recombinant vector or trans¬ formation vehicle, comprising said DNA construct of the in¬ vention, and furthermore to a cell comprising said DNA con¬ struct or said recombinant vector or transformation vehicle. Further, the invention is directed towards microbially polypeptides with reduced allergenicity produced according to the process of the invention. Also contemplated are composi¬ tions comprising at least one polypeptide component of the invention. Finally the invention relates to the use of Zipper domains for reducing the allergenicity of polypeptides. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 shows the DNA sequence and derived amino acid sequence of a linker, the GCN4 Leucine Zipper and a flexible C-terminal extension peptide containing a cystein amino acid residue. Figure 2 shows the construction steps of the pAZ-1 plasmid. Figure 3 shows a coomassie blue stained SDS-PAGE run under non- reducing conditions, wherein lane 4 is a molecular weight mar¬ ker SeeBlue™ (Cat. : LC5625, Novex, Inc., Ca, USA), and lanes 2 and 3 are polypeptides expressed by E. coli JM105 comprising the DNA construct pAZ-1. Figure 4 shows coomassie blue stained SDS-PAGE run under reducing conditions, wherein lane l is a molecular weight marker SeeBlue™ (Cat. : LC5625, Novex, Inc., Ca, USA), and lanes 2 and 3 are polypeptides expressed by E. coli JM105 comprising the DNA construct pAZ-1. Figure 5 shows a Western blot. Lane 1 is the molecular weight marker. Lanes 2 and 3 are samples from the induced JM105/pAZ-l run under non-reduced conditions. Lanes 4 and 5 are the same samples run under reduced conditions. Figure 6 shows the number of Dunkin Hartley guinea pig, having been exposed to 1.0 μg monomer and 1.0 μg dimer Termamyl® intratracheally, found to be IgGi positive vs. days starting from the day of exposure. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present inventors have now surprisingly succeeded in pro¬ viding an integrated industrially applicable process for pro¬ ducing polypeptides with reduced allergenicity, wherein the biological activity of the polypeptides is at least substan- tially maintained. A "substantially" maintained activity is in the context of the present invention defined as an activity which is at least be¬ tween 20% and 30%, preferably between 30% and 40%, more pre- ferably between 40% and 60%, better from 60% up to 80%, even better from 80% up to about 100%, in comparison to the activity of the not modified parent polypeptide. Said polypeptides may be used for a vast number of industrial applications which will be exemplified below. It is to be understood that, in connection with industrial applications of polypeptides, it is mainly inhalation of the allergens that may inflict a risk of an allergic response. Therefore, one of the crucial advantages of the present invention is, that the inventors have solved the problem of respiratory challenge with allergens, whereas prior art sol- utions mainly concern dermal challenge with alleged immunogens. Respiratory challenge is a much more sensitive question. The term "reduced allergenicity" indicates that the amount of produced IgE (in humans, and molecules with comparable effects in specific animals, for instance IgG, in guinea pigs) , which can lead to an allergic state are significantly decreased when inhalating a polypeptide of the invention in comparison to the corresponding parent polypeptide. The terms "immunogen", "antigen" and "allergen" are defined below, as these term often are use in an unclean manner, even by scientists. An "immunogen" may be defined as a substance which when in- troduced into humans and animals is capable of stimulating an immunologic response. The term "antigen" refers to substances which by themselves are capable of generating antibodies when recognized as a non-self molecule by the immune system. Further, an "allergen" may be defined as an antigen which may give rise to allergic sensitization or an allergic response by IgE antibodies (in humans, and molecules with comparable ef- fects in animals) . It is to be understood that the term "immunogen" is the wider term and includes "antigen" and "allergen". As mentioned above it is, at least in the context of poly¬ peptides of the present invention, important to distinguish between dermal allergens mediating allergic responses caused by skin contact, and respiratory allergens causing allergic re- sponses by contact with cell-bound IgE in the bronchial tree, due to the well-known fact that skin tests may be negative even though inhalation tests provoke an allergic response. Therefore assessment of allergenicity may be made by inhalation tests, comparing the effect of intratracheal administrated parent polypeptides with the corresponding polypeptides of the invention with reduced allergenicity. Two main hazard assessment approaches exists, animal models and in vitro models, respectively. Animal models recommended by ECETOC (see Monografi ECETOC no. 19, p. 17-27) includes both mice and guinea pig models. The mice models focus upon events occurring during the induc- tion phase of sensitisation following primary encounter of the substance in question. However, mice are not considered suit¬ able for investigating polypeptides. In contrast hereto the guinea pig models seek to identify respiratory allergens as a function of elicitation reactions induced in previously sensitised animals. ECETOC assesses results of studies using guinea pig as a suitable basis for hazard assessment in man. Specifically, in the context of assessment of allergenicity of polypeptides according to the invention, models involving introduction of polypeptides intratracheal in guiniea pigs are suitable. One suitable strain of guinea pigs, the Dunkin Hartley strain, does not (as humans) produce IgE antibodies in connection with the allergic response. However, they produce another type of antibody the IgG,A and IgG,B which characterize their allergenic response to inhaled polypeptides (see e.g. Prentø, ATLA, 19, p. 8-14, 1991). Therefore when using the Dunkin Hartley animal model, the relative amounts of IgG,A and IgG,B are a measure for the allergenicity level. Other animal models such as rats, rabbits etc. could also be used for comparable studies. The production of a polypeptide with reduced allergenicity according to the invention specifically comprises a) fermenting a microorganism capable of producing said polypeptide, and b) recovering said polypeptide in substantially pure form, wherein said microorganism is modified in a manner whereby the expressed polypeptide molecules self-oligomerize. The allergenicity of the polypeptides is believed to be reduced by the enlargement of the polypeptides. The term "self-oligomerization" does in the context of the present invention mean joining together a desired number of polypeptide molecules, e.g. by the use of Zipper domains, and includes dimerization, trinterization, tetramerization, multimerization, polymerization etc. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the microorganism is modified by introducing one or more DNA construct(s) into said microorganism. Said DNA construct comprises a DNA sequence encoding at least one polypeptide of interest operably linked to at least one Zipper domain. Optionally the DNA sequence may further comprise a short linker sequence between the sequence encoding the polypeptide and the Zippper domain and/or a DNA sequence encoding a purification tag. The recovery of the oligomerized polypeptide may be carried out in any suitable way. In the case of using a poly-His tail purification tag the polypeptides may be recovered by IMAC (Immobbilized Metal Affinity Chromatography) following the procedure described in e.g. Yip et al., (1994;, Molecular Biotechnology, vol. 1, p. 151-164; Fatiadi et al., (1987), CRC Critical Rev. Anal. Chem. 18, p. 1-44. A linker sequence is a DNA sequence encoding an amino acid sequence connecting the polypeptide in question and the Zipper domain. The enlargement of the polypeptides takes place during fermen¬ tation. The amino acid sequence of the Zipper domain is ex¬ pressed grafted to the N- or C-terminal of the polypeptide of interest. When this fusion-polypeptide is expressed Zipper domains associate e.g. two and two and are held together by hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. Dependent on the Zipper domain used the fusion polypeptide may also form trinters, tetramers etc. The process of the invention is advantageous due to the fact that no additional step need to be executed after the fermen¬ tation and before the recovery to obtain the polypeptide product with reduced allergenicity. Further, it is also an advantage that the process according to the invention may be used for any polypeptides of interest, which may be any polypeptides that in parent form may cause an allergic reaction. This group comprises polypeptides having a molecular weight below about 100 kDa. In general the said molecular weight lies in the range of between about 5 kDa and 150 kDa, preferably from between about 20 kDa and 100 kDa, especially from between about 20 kDa and 80 kDa. The polypeptides may be of microbial or mammalian origin and may be naturally occurring polypeptides or variants thereof. In an embodiment of the invention the polypeptide of interest is an enzyme exhibiting at least one catalytic activity. Such enzymes may be selected from the group comprising proteas- es (metallo, acid, neutral or alkaline) , lipases, cutinases, cellulases, amylases, lyases, xylanases, pectinases, pullulana- se, polygalacturonases, oxidases, laccases, oxidoreductases, transglutaminases, α-galactpcidases, phytases and peroxidases A specific example of such enzyme is Termamyl® (Novo Nordisk A/S) , an QE-amylase, having a molecular weight of about 55 kDa. The process of the invention enables the production of hybrid products exhibiting more than one biological activity, e.g. hetero-dimeric enzymes which exhibit two different catalytic activities, such as lipolytic and proteolytic activities. Also contemplated are trimeric, tetrameric, multimeric poly¬ peptides and/or enzymes exhibiting one or more catalytic activities. The polypeptide with reduced allergenicity may be produced by any suitable bacteria or fungal organisms as described below. DNA construct Another object of the invention is to provide a DNA construct for the production of polypeptides with reduced allergenicity, comprising a DNA sequence encoding at least one polypeptide, and at least one Zipper domain. As used herein the term "DNA construct" is intended to indicate any nucleic acid molecule of cDNA, genomic DNA, synthetic DNA, RNA or PNA origin. The term "construct" is intended to indicate a nucleic acid segment which may be single- or double-stranded, and which may be based on a DNA sequence encoding a polypeptide of interest fused to at least one Zipper domain. The construct may optionally contain other DNA segments, such as a short linker sequence and/or a sequence encoding a peptide segment specifically used for purification purposes. The DNA construct of the invention may suitably be of genomic or cDNA origin, for instance obtained by preparing a genomic or cDNA library and screening for DNA sequences coding for all or parts of the polypeptide of interest by hybridization using synthetic oligonucleotide probes in accordance with standard techniques (cf. Sambrook et al.. Molecular Cloning. A Labora¬ tory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1989) . The DNA sequence may encode a polypeptide exhibiting catalytic activities. In particular, the DNA sequence may encoding at least one enzyme selected from the group comprising proteases (metallo, acid, neutral or alkaline), lipases, cutinases, cellulases, amylases, lyases, xylanases, pectinases, polygalacturonases, oxidases, laccases, oxidoreductases, transglutaminases, -galactosidases, phytases or peroxidases. The DNA construct of the invention may also be prepared syn¬ thetically by established standard methods, e.g. the phospho- amidite method described by Beaucage and Caruthers, Tetrahedron Letters, 22, p. 1859 - 1869, 1981, or the method described by Matthes et al., EMBO Journal, 3, p. 801 - 805, 1984. According to the phosphoamidite method, oligonucleotides are synthesized, e.g. in an automatic DNA synthesizer, purified, annealed, ligated and cloned in suitable vectors. Furthermore, the DNA construct may be of mixed synthetic and genomic, mixed synthetic and cDNA or mixed genomic and cDNA origin prepared by ligating fragments of synthetic, genomic or cDNA origin (as appropriate) , the fragments corresponding to various parts of the entire DNA construct, in accordance with standard techniques. The DNA construct may also be prepared by polymerase chain reaction using specific primers, for instance as described in US 4,683,202 or Saiki et al. , Science, 239, p. 487 - 491, 1988. In a specific embodiment the DNA construct of the invention comprises the DNA sequence shown in SEQ ID NO 1 as well as nucleic acid sequences encoding the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO 2, but may differ from the DNA sequence shown in SEQ ID NO 1 by virtue of the degeneracy of the genetic code. Recombinant vector In a further aspect the present invention relates to a recom¬ binant vector or transformation vehicle comprising a DNA con¬ struct of the invention. The recombinant vector into which the DNA construct of the invention is inserted may be any vector which may conveniently be subjected to recombinant DNA pro¬ cedures, and the choice of vector will often depend on the host cell into which it is to be introduced. Thus, the vector may be an autonomously replicating vector, i.e. a vector which exists as an extrachromosomal entity, the replication of which is in- dependent of chromosomal replication, e.g. a plasmid. Alterna¬ tively, the vector may be one which, when introduced into a host cell, is integrated into the host cell genome and repli¬ cated together with the chromosome(s) into which it has been integrated. The vector is preferably an expression vector in which the DNA sequence encoding the polypeptide of interest to be self-oligo- merized is operably linked to additional segments required for transcription of the DNA. In general, the expression vector is derived from plasmid or viral DNA, or may contain elements of both. The term, "operably linked" indicates that the segments are arranged so that they function in concert for their intend¬ ed purposes, e.g. transcription initiates in a promoter and proceeds through the DNA sequence coding for the polypeptide of interest. The promoter may be any DNA sequence which shows transcrip- tional activity in the host cell of choice and may be derived from genes encoding polypeptides either homologous or heterologous to the host cell. Examples of suitable promoters for use in yeast host cells in¬ clude promoters from yeast glycolytic genes (Hitzeman et al., J. Biol. Chem. , 255, p. 12073 - 12080, 1980; Alber and Kawasaki, J. Mol. Appl. Gen., 1, p. 419 - 434, 1982) or alcohol dehydrogenase genes (Young et al., in Genetic Engineering of Microorganisms for Chemicals (Hollaender et al, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1982), or the TPI1 (US 4,599,311) or ADH2-4C (Russell et al., Nature, 304, p. 652 - 654, 1983) promoters. Examples of suitable promoters for use in filamentous fungus host cells are, for instance, the ADH3 promoter (McKnight et al., The EMBO J. , 4, p. 2093 - 2099, 1985) or the tpiA promo¬ ter. Examples of other useful promoters are those derived from the gene encoding A. oryzae TAKA amylase, Rhizomucor miehei aspartic proteinase, A. niger neutral α-amylase, A. niger acid stable α-amylase, A. niger or A. awamori glucoamylase (gluA) , Rhizomucor miehei lipase, A. oryzae alkaline protease, A. oryzae triose phosphate isomerase or A. nidulans acetamidase. Preferred are the TAKA-amylase and gluA promoters. Examples of suitable promoters for use in bacterial host cells include the promoter of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, the Bacillus licheniformis alpha- amylase gene, the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BAN amylase gene, the Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gen, or the Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, or by the phage Lambda P R or P L promoters or the E. coli lac, trp or tac promoters. The DNA sequence may also, if necessary, be operably connected to a suitable terminator. The recombinant vector of the invention may further comprise a DNA sequence enabling the vector to replicate in the host cell in question.. The vector may also comprise a selectable marker, e.g. a gene the product of which complements a defect in the host cell, such as the gene coding for dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) or the Schizosaccharomyces pombe TPI gene (described by P.R. Russell, Gene 40, 1985, p. 125-130), or one which confers resistance to a drug, e.g. ampicillin, kanamycin, tetracyclin, phleomycin, chloramphenicol, neomycin, hygromycin or methotrexate. For filamentous fungi, selectable markers include amdS, pyrG, argB, niaD, trpC and sC. To direct the polypeptide into the secretory pathway of the host cells, a secretory signal sequence (also known as a leader sequence, prepro sequence or pre sequence) may be provided in the recombinant vector. The secretory signal sequence is joined to the DNA sequence encoding the polypeptide in the correct reading frame. Secretory signal sequences are commonly posi¬ tioned 5' to the DNA sequence encoding the polypeptide. The secretory signal sequence may be that normally associated with the polypeptide or may be from a gene encoding another secreted polypeptide. For secretion from yeast cells, the secretory signal sequence may encode any signal peptide which ensures efficient direction of the expressed polypeptide into the secretory pathway of the cell. The signal peptide may be naturally occurring signal peptide, or a functional part thereof, or it may be a synthetic peptide. Suitable signal peptides have been found to be the α- factor signal peptide (cf. US 4,870,008), the signal peptide of mouse salivary amylase (cf. 0. Hagenbuchle et al., Nature, 289, p. 643-646, 1981), a modified carboxypeptidase signal peptide (cf. L.A. Vails et al.. Cell, 48, p. 887-897, 1987), the yeast BAR1 signal peptide (cf. WO 87/02670) , or the yeast aspartic protease 3 (YAP3) signal peptide (cf. M. Egel-Mitani et al.. Yeast, 6, p. 127-137, 1990). For efficient secretion in yeast, a sequence encoding a leader peptide may also be inserted downstream of the signal sequence and upstream of the DNA sequence encoding the polypeptide. The function of the leader peptide is to allow the expressed polypeptide to be directed from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus and further to a secretory vesicle for secretion into the culture medium (i.e. exportation of the polypeptide across the cell wall or at least through the cellular membrane into the periplasmic space of the yeast cell) . The leader peptide may be the yeast α-factor leader (the use of which is described in e.g. US 4,546,082, EP 16 201, EP 123 294, EP 123 544 and EP 163 529). Alternatively, the leader peptide may be a synthetic leader peptide, which is to say a leader peptide not found in nature. Synthetic leader peptides may, for instance, be constructed as described in WO 89/02463 or WO 92/11378. For use in filamentous fungi, the signal peptide may conveni¬ ently be derived from a gene encoding an Aspergillus sp. amylase or glucoamylase, a gene encoding a Rhizomucor miehei lipase or protease or a Humicola lanuginosa lipase. The signal peptide is preferably derived from a gene encoding A. oryzae TAKA amylase, A. niger neutral α-amylase, A. niger acid-stable amylase, or A. niger glucoamylase. In a preferred specific embodiment of the invention said vector is the pAZ-1 expression vector. The procedures used to ligate the DNA sequences coding for the polypeptide in question, the promoter and optionally the ter¬ minator and/or secretory signal sequence, respectively, and to insert them into suitable vectors containing the information necessary for replication, are well known to persons skilled in the art (cf., for instance, Sambrook et al., supra. 1989). Host cell The DNA sequence encoding the fusion polypeptide in question, introduced into the host cell may be either homologous or heterologous to the host in question. If homologous to the host cell, i.e. produced by the host cell in nature, it will typically be operably connected to another promoter sequence or, if applicable, another secretory signal sequence and/or terminator sequence than in its natural environment. The term "homologous" is intended to include a cDNA sequence encoding a polypeptide native to the host organism in question. The term "heterologous" is intended to include a DNA sequence not ex¬ pressed by the host cell in nature. Thus, the DNA sequence may be from another organism, or it may be a synthetic sequence. The host cell into which the DNA construct or the recombinant vector of the invention is introduced may be any cell which is capable of producing the polypeptide of interest and includes bacteria, yeast, filamentous fungi. Examples of bacterial host cells which, on cultivation, are capable of producing the polypeptide of interest are gramposi- tive bacteria such as strains of Bacillus, such as strains of B . subtilis, B . licheniformis, B. lentus, B . brevis, B . stea¬ rothermophilus, B . alkalophilus, B . amyloliquefaciens , B . coagulans , B . circulans, B . lautus, B. megaterium or B. thurin- giensis, or strains of Streptomyces , such as S. lividans , s. murinus or S. griseus, or gramnegative bacteria such as Esche- richia coli . The transformation of the bacteria may be effected by protoplast transformation or by using competent cells in a manner known per se (cf. Sambrook et al., supra) . When expressing the polypeptide in bacteria such as E. coli , the polypeptide may be retained in the cytoplasm, typically as insoluble granules (known as inclusion bodies) , or may be di- rected to the periplasmic space by a bacterial secretion se¬ quence. In the former case, the cells are lysed and the granules are recovered and denatured after which the poly¬ peptide is refolded by diluting the denaturing agent. In the latter case, the polypeptide may be recovered from the peri- plasmic space by disrupting the cells, e.g. by sonication or osmotic shock, to release the contents of the periplasmic space and recovering the polypeptide. Examples of suitable yeasts cells include cells of Saccharomy- ces spp. or Schizosaccharomyces spp. , in particular strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Saccharomyces kluyveri . Methods for transforming yeast cells with heterologous DNA and producing heterologous polypeptide therefrom are described, e .g . in US 4,599,311, US 4,931,373, US 4,870,008, 5,037,743, and US 4,845,075, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Transformed cells are selected by a phenotype determined by a selectable marker, commonly drug resistance or the ability to grow in the absence of a particular nutrient, e .g. leucine. A preferred vector for use in yeast is the P0T1 vector disclosed in US 4,931,373. The DNA sequence encoding the polypeptide of the invention may be preceded by a signal sequence and optio¬ nally a leader sequence, e.g. as described above. Further examples of suitable yeast cells are strains of Kluyveromyces , such as K. lactis , Hansenula, e .g. H. polymorpha, or Pichia, e .g. P. pastor is (cf. Gleeson et al., J. Gen. Microbiol. 132, 1986, p. 3459-3465; US 4,882,279). Examples of other fungal cells are cells of filamentous fungi, e.g. Aspergillus spp., Neurospora spp., Fusarium spp. or Trichoderma spp., in particular strains of A. oryzae , A. nidulans or A. niger. The use of Aspergillus spp. for the expression of polypeptides is described in, e .g. , EP 272 277, EP 238 023 and EP 184 438. The transformation of F. oxysporum may, for instance, be carried out as described by Malardier et al.. Gene, 78, p. 147-156, 1989. When a filamentous fungus is used as the host cell it may be transformed with the DNA construct of the invention conveni¬ ently by integrating the DNA construct in the host chromosome to obtain a recombinant host cell. This integration is gene¬ rally considered to be an advantage as the DNA sequence is more likely to be stably maintained in the cell. Integration of the DNA constructs into the host chromosome may be performed accor¬ ding to conventional methods, e.g. by homologous or heterolo¬ gous recombination. The transformed host cell described above is then cultured in a suitable nutrient medium under conditions permitting the expression of the polypeptide of interest, after which the resulting polypeptide is recovered from the culture. The medium used to culture the cells may be any conventional medium suitable for growing the host cells, such as minimal or complex media containing appropriate supplements. Suitable media are available from commercial suppliers or may be prepared according to published recipes (e.g. in catalogues of the American Type Culture Collection) . The polypeptide produced by the cells may then be recovered from the culture medium by conventional procedures including separating the host cells from the medium by centrifugation or filtration, precipitating the proteinaceous components of the supernatant or filtrate by means of a salt, e.g. ammonium sulphate, purification by a variety of chromatographic procedures, e.g. ion exchange chromatography, gelfiltration chromatography, affinity chroma- tography, or the like, dependent on the type of polypeptide in question. Polypeptides The invention is also directed towards polypeptides with re¬ duced allergenicity produced according to a process of the invention. The polypeptide of the invention consist of a Zipper domain fused to the polypeptide of interest. The N- or C-terminal of the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide is grafted to the Zipper domain. The Zipper domain may be any domain capable of oligomerizing the polypeptides in the production phase. In a specific em¬ bodiment the Zipper domain is a Leucine Zipper, such as the GCN4 Leucine Zipper. Preferably the monomeric polypeptide has a molecular weight of between 5 kDa and 150 kDa, preferable between 20 kDa and 100 kDa, especially between 20 kDa and 80 kDa. When using Leucine Zippers for oligomerizing polypeptides con¬ sisting of two polypeptide molecules, such as two Termamyl® molecules, the Leucine Zippers normally have enough affinity to keep the homo-dimer stable. However, to further stabilize the dimer, a cysteine may be included in the Leucine Zipper. This construction can lead to the formation of a disulfide bridge between the two monomers of hybrid polypeptide. The polypeptide of the invention comprises from 2 to 10 poly¬ peptide molecules or more. In a preferred embodiment the self- oligomerized polypeptide is a dimer, a trimer, a tetramer, or an oligomer. It is possible to persist or resume the biological activity of the polypeptide, e.g. the enzymatic activity of a dimerized enzyme. Further the polypeptide of the invention may exhibit more than one biological activity, e.g. two or more different enzymatic activities, such as lipolytic and proteolytic activities. Oligomeric polypeptides The invention also related to oligomeric polypeptides with reduced allergenicity comprising at least one polypeptide bonded or linked to at least one Zipper domain which is coupled to at least one polypeptide bonded or linked to at least one Zipper domain. Said oligomeric polypeptides may be homo-oligomeric, hetero- oligomeric or higher order oligomeric polypeptide produced by any suitable process or prepared by any suitable method. Said Zipper domain may be any of the previously mentioned Zipper domains. In an embodiment said oligomeric polypeptide exhibits at least one of the previously mentioned enzymatic activities. Said Zipper domain may be linked to either the C- or N-terminal of the polypeptide(s) in question. In the following the term "polypeptide" includes both polypeptides produced according to the process of the invention and said oligomeric polypeptides of the invention. A polypeptide according to the invention may demonstrate a high degree of controlled stability. In certain cases the polypeptides may advantageously be irreversible fused together, which entails that the product has only negligible tendency to disintegrate, which would lead to the return of conditions that may cause an allergenic state. However in certain other cases, it is advantageous that the polypeptides stay oligomerized in the production and/or bulk handling phase, but dissociates later on, when the polypeptides does not inflict a risk of exposure to humans or animals. The cleavage of the linkage between the polypeptides may be activated e.g. by physical conditions, such as pH, ionic strength, temperature, reduction or oxidation potential etc. Further the presence of specific compounds may result in dissociating e.g. into lower order oligomers or monomers. Especially in the case where the activity of the polypeptides are reduced in the oligomerized form, dissociation may be advantageous. Composition The invention also relates to a composition comprising at least one polypeptide and/or at least one oligomeric polypeptide of the invention. The composition may further comprise other ingredients normally used in e.g. detergents, including soap bars, household artic¬ les, agrochemicals, personal care products, cosmetics, toile¬ try, pharmaceuticals, composition used for treating textiles, food and/or feed etc. Detergent compositions According to the invention, a polypeptide of the invention may be an enzyme used in detergent compositions. It may be included in the detergent composition in the form of a non-dusting granulate, a stabilized liquid, or a protected enzyme. Non- dusting granulates may be produced, e.g., as disclosed in US 4,106,991 and 4,661,452 (both to Novo Industri A/S) and may optionally be coated by methods known in the art. Examples of waxy coating materials are poly(ethylene oxide) products (polyethyleneglycol, PEG) with mean molecular weights of 1000 to 20000; ethoxylated nonylphenols having from 16 to 50 ethylene oxide units; ethoxylated fatty alcohols in which the alcohol contains from 12 to 20 carbon atoms and in which there are 15 to 80 ethylene oxide units; fatty alcohols; fatty acids; and mono- and di- and triglycerides of fatty acids. Examples of film-forming coating materials suitable for application by fluid bed techniques are given in patent GB 1483591. Liquid enzyme preparations may, for instance, be stabilized by adding a polyol such as propylene glycol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid or boric acid according to established methods. Other enzyme stabilizers are well known in the art. Protected enzymes may be prepared according to the method disclosed in EP 238,216. The detergent composition may be in any convenient form, e.g. as powder, granules, paste or liquid. A liquid detergent may be aqueous, typically containing up to 70% water and 0-30% organic solvent, or nonaqueous. The detergent composition comprises one or more surfactants, each of which may be anionic, nonionic, cationic, or zwitterio¬ nic. The detergent will usually contain 0-50% of anionic sur¬ factant such as linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (LAS) , alpha- olefinsulfonate (AOS) , alkyl sulfate (fatty alcohol sulfate) (AS) , alcohol ethoxysulfate (AEOS or AES) , secondary alkanesul- fonates (SAS) , alpha-sulfo fatty acid methyl esters, alkyl- or alkenylsuccinic acid, or soap. It may also contain 0-40% of nonionic surfactant such as alcohol ethoxylate (AEO or AE) , carboxylated alcohol ethoxylates, nonylphenol ethoxylate, alkylpolyglycoside, alkyldimethylamine oxide, ethoxylated fatty acid monoethanolamide, fatty acid monoethanolamide, or polyhydroxy alkyl fatty acid amide (e.g. as described in WO 92/06154) . The detergent composition may additionally comprise one or more enzymes, such as e.g. amylases, lipases, cutinases, proteases, cellulases, peroxidases, and oxidases. The detergent may contain 1-65% of a detergent builder or co plexing agent such as zeolite, diphosphate, triphosphate, phosphonate, citrate, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) , ethylene- diaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) , diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTMPA) , alkyl- or alkenylsuccinic acid, soluble silicates or layered silicates (e.g. SKS-6 from Hoechst) . The detergent may also be unbuilt, i.e. essentially free of detergent builder. The detergent may comprise one or more polymers. Examples are carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) , poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) , polyethyleneglycol (PEG), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) , polycarbo- xylates such as polyacrylates, maleic/acrylic acid copolymers and lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid copolymers. The detergent may contain a bleaching system which may comprise a H 2 0 2 source such as perborate or percarbonate which may be combined with a peracid-forming bleach activator such as tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED) or nonanoyloxybenzenesulfo- nate (NOBS) . Alternatively, the bleaching system may comprise peroxyacids of, e.g., the amide, imide, or sulfone type. The detergent composition of the invention comprising the polypeptide of the invention may be stabilized using conven- tional stabilizing agents, e.g. a polyol such as propylene glycol or glycerol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid, boric acid, or a boric acid derivative such as, e.g., an aromatic borate ester, and the composition may be formulated as described in, e .g. , WO 92/19709 and WO 92/19708. The detergent may also contain other conventional detergent ingredients such as, e .g. , fabric conditioners including clays, 5 foam boosters, suds suppressors, anti-corrosion agents, soil- suspending agents, anti-soil-redeposition agents, dyes, bactericideε, optical brighteners, or perfume. The pH (measured in aqueous solution at use concentration) will 10 usually be neutral or alkaline, e.g. in the range of 7-11. Particular forms of detergent compositions within the scope of the invention include: 151) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/1 comprising - linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 7 - 12% 20 - alcohol ethoxysulfate (e.g. Cj 2 .i 8 alcohol, 1-2 EO) or alkyl sulfate (e.g. C 16 . lg ) 1 - 4% - alcohol ethoxylate 25 (e . g. C 14 ,, 5 alcohol, 7 EO) 5 - 9% - sodium carbonate (as Na 2 C0 3 ) 14 - 20% - soluble silicate (as Na 2 0 , 2Si0 2 ) 30 - zeolite ( as NaAlSi0 4 ) - sodium sulfate (as Na 2 S0 4 ) 35 - sodium citrate/citric acid (as C 6 H 5 Na 3 0 7 /C 6 H g 0 7 ) - sodium perborate (as NaB0 3 . H 2 0) - TAED 40 - carboxymethylcellulose - polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PVP, PEG) 45 - enzymes - minor ingredients (e.g. suds suppressors, perfume, optical brightener, photobleach) 0 - 5% 52) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/1 comprising - linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 6 - 11% 0 - alcohol ethoxysulfate (e.g. C n . alcohol, 1-2 EO) or alkyl sulfate (e.g. C 16 - 1 ) 1 - 3% - alcohol ethoxylate 5 (e.g. C 14 ., 5 alcohol, 7 EO) 5 - 9% - sodium carbonate (as Na 2 C0 3 ) 15 - 21% - soluble silicate (as Na 2 0,2Si0 2 ) 1 - 4% 0 - zeolite (as NaAlSi0 4 ) 24 - 34% - sodium sulfate (as Na 2 S0 4 ) 4 - 10% 5 - sodium citrate/citric acid 0 - 15% - polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, 0 PVP, PEG) 1 - 6% - enzymes 0 - 5% - minor ingredients 5 (e.g. suds suppressors, perfume) 0 - 5% 3) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/1 comprising 0 - linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 5 - 9% - alcohol ethoxylate (e . g. C 12 . 15 alcohol , 7 EO) 7 - 14% 5 - soap as fatty acid (e.g. fatty acid) 1 - 3% - sodium carbonate (as Na 2 C0 3 ) 10 - 17% 0 - soluble silicate (as Na 2 0,ciao 2 ) 3 - 9% - zeolite (as NaAlSi0 4 ) 23 - 33% - sodium sulfate (as Na 2 S0 4 ) 0 - 4% - sodium perborate (as NaB0 3 .H 2 0) 8 - 16% 5 - TAED 2 - 8% - phosphonate (e.g. EDTMPA) 0 - 1% - carboxymethylcellulose 0 - 2% 10 - polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PVP, PEG) 0 - 3% - enzymes 0 - 5% 15 - minor ingredients (e.g. suds suppressors, perfume, optical brightener) 0 - 5% 204) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/1 comprising - linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 25 - alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C 12 .j 5 alcohol, 7 EO) - sodium carbonate (as Na 2 C0 3 ) 14 - 22% 30 - soluble silicate (as Na 2 0,2Si0 2 ) - zeolite (as NaAlSi0 4 ) 35 - sodium sulfate (as Na 2 S0 4 ) - carboxymethylcellulose - polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolyme 40 PVP, PEG) - enzymes - minor ingredients (e.g. suds suppressors, 45 perfume) 0 - 5% 5) An aqueous liquid detergent composition comprising - linear alkylbenzenesulfonate 50 (calculated as acid) 15 - 21% - alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C 12-1j alcohol, 7 EO or C J alcohol, 5 EO) 12 - 18% - soap as fatty acid (e.g. oleic acid) 3 - 13% - alkenylsuccinic acid (C 12 ., 4 ) 0 - 13% - aminoethanol 8 - 18% - citric acid 2 - 8% - phosphonate 0 - 3% - polymers (e.g. PVP, PEG) 0 - 3% - borate (as B 4 O 7 ) 0 - 2% - ethanol 0 - 3% - propylene glycol 8 - 14% - enzymes 0 - 5% - minor ingredients (e.g. dispersants, suds suppressors, perfume, optical brightener) 0 - 5% 6) An aqueous structured liquid detergent composition compris¬ ing - linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 15 - 21% -_alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C 12 .,j alcohol, 7 EO, or C, 2- i 5 alcohol, 5 EO) 3 - 9% - soap as fatty acid (e.g. oleic acid) 3 - 10% - zeolite (as NaAlSi0 4 ) 14 - 22% - potassium citrate 9 - 18% - borate (as B 4 0 7 ) 0 - 2% - carboxymethylcellulose 0 - 2% - polymers (e.g PEG, PVP) 0 - 3% - anchoring polymers such as, e.g., lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid copolymer; molar ratio 25:1; MW 3800 0 - 3% - glycerol 0 - 5% - enzymes 0 - 5% - minor ingredients (e.g. dispersants, suds suppressors, perfume, optical brighteners) 0 - 5% 7) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/1 comprising - fatty alcohol sulfate 5 - 10% - ethoxylated fatty acid monoethanolamide 3 - 9% - soap as fatty acid 0 - 3% - sodium carbonate (as Na 2 C0 3 ) 5 - 10% - soluble silicate (as Na 2 0,2Si0 2 ) 1 - 4% - zeolite (as NaAlSi0 4 ) 20 - 40% - sodium sulfate (as Na 2 S0 4 ) 2 - 8% - sodium perborate (as NaB0 3 .H 2 0) 12 - 18% - TAED 2 - 7% - polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PEG) 1 - 5% - enzymes 0 - 5% - minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, suds suppressors, perfume) 0 - 5% 8) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate comprising - linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 8 - 14% - ethoxylated fatty acid monoethanolamide 5 - 11% - soap as fatty acid 0 - 3% - sodium carbonate (as Na 2 C0 3 ) 4 - 10% - soluble silicate (as Na 2 0 , 2Si0 2 ) 1 - 4% - zeolite (as NaAlSi0 4 ) 30 - 50% - sodium sulfate (as Na 2 S0 4 ) 3 - 11% - sodium citrate (as C 6 H 5 Na 3 0 7 ) 5 - 12% - polymers (e.g. PVP, maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PEG) 1 - 5% - enzymes 0 - 5% - minor ingredients (e.g. suds suppressors, perfume) 0 - 5% 59) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate comprising - linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 6 - 12% - nonionic surfactant, 1 - 4% 10 - soap as fatty acid 2 - 6% - sodium carbonate (as Na 2 C0 3 ) 14 - 22% 15 - zeolite (as NaAlSi0 4 ) 18 - 32% - sodium sulfate (as Na 2 S0 4 ) 5 - 20% - sodium citrate (as C 6 H 5 Na 3 0 7 ) 3 - 8% 20 - sodium perborate (as NaB0 3 . H 2 0) 4 - 9% - bleach activator (e. g. NOBS or TAED) 1 - 5% 25 - carboxymethylcellulose 0 - 2% - polymers (e . g . polycarboxylate or PEG) 1 - 5% - enzymes 0 - 5% 30 - minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, perfume) 0 - 5% 3510) An aqueous liquid detergent composition comprising - linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 15 - 23% - alcohol ethoxysulfate 40 (e.g. C 12-15 alcohol, 2-3 EO) 8 - 15% - alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C 12 ., 5 alcohol, 7 EO, or C 12 ., 5 alcohol, 5 EO) 3 - 9% 45 - soap as fatty acid (e.g. lauric acid) 0 - 3% - aminoethanol 1 - 5% 50 - sodium citrate 5 - 10% - hydrotrope (e.g. sodium toluenesulfonate) 2 - 6% - borate (as B^) 0 - 2% - carboxymethylcellulose 0 - 1% - ethanol 1 - 3% 5 - propylene glycol 2 - 5% - enzymes 0 - 5% - minor ingredients (e.g. polymers, dispersants, 10 perfume, optical brighteners) 0 - 5% 11) An aqueous liquid detergent composition comprising - linear alkylbenzenesulfonate 15 (calculated as acid) 20 - 32% - alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C 12 ., 5 alcohol, 7 EO, or c i 2 -i5 alcohol, 5 EO) 6 - 12% 20 - aminoethanol 2 - 6% - citric acid 8 - 14% 25 - borate (as B^) 1 - 3% - polymer (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, anchoring polymer such as, e.g., lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid 30 copolymer) 0 - 3% - glycerol 3 - 8% - enzymes 0 - 5% 35 - minor ingredients (e.g. hydrotropes, dispersants, perfume, optical brighteners) 0 - 5% 4012) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/1 comprising - anionic surfactant (linear alkylbenzenesulfonate, alkyl sulfate, alpha- olefinsulfonate, alpha-sulfo fatty acid 45 methyl esters, alkanesulfonates, soap) 25 - 40% - nonionic surfactant (e . g . alcohol ethoxylate) 1 - 10% 50 - sodium carbonate (as Na 2 C0 3 ) 8 - 25% - soluble silicates (as Na 2 0, 2Si0 2 ) 5 - 15% - sodium sulfate (as Na 2 S0 4 ) 0 - 5% - zeolite (as NaAlSi0 4 ) 15 - 28% - sodium perborate (as NaB0 3 .4H 2 0) 0 - 20% 5 - bleach activator (TAED or NOBS) 0 - 5% - enzymes 0 - 5% - minor ingredients 10 (e.g. perfume, optical brighteners) 0 - 3% 13) Detergent formulations as described in 1) - 12) wherein all or part of the linear alkylbenzenesulfonate is replaced by (C, 2 - 15 C„) alkyl sulfate . 14) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/1 comprising 20 - (Cι 2 -Cιg) alkyl sulfate 9 - 15% - alcohol ethoxylate 3 - 6% - polyhydroxy alkyl fatty acid amide 1 - 5% 25 - zeolite (as NaAlSi0 4 ) 10 - 20% - layered disilicate (e.g. SK56 from Hoechst) 10 - 20% 30 - sodium carbonate (as Na 2 C0 3 ) 3 - 12% - soluble silicate (as Na 2 0, 2Si0 2 ) 0 - 6% 35 - sodium citrate 4 - 8% - sodium per carbonate 13 - 22% - TAED 3 - 8% 40 - polymers (e.g. polycarboxylates and PVP) 0 - 5% - enzymes 0 - 5% 45 - minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, photo bleach, perfume, suds suppressors) 0 - 5% 5015) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/1 comprising - (C 12 -C„) alkyl sulfate 4 - 8% - alcohol ethoxylate 11 - 15% - soap 1 - 4% 5 - zeolite MAP or zeolite A 35 - 45% - sodium carbonate (as NaC0 3 ) 2 - 8% - soluble silicate (as Na 2 0,2Si0 2 ) 0 - 4% 10 - sodium percarbonate 13 - 22% - TAED 1 - 8% 15 - carboxymethyl cellulose 0 - 3% - polymers (e.g. polycarboxylates and PVP) 0 - 3% - enzymes 0 - 5% 20 - minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, phosphonate, perfume) 0 - 3% 2516) Detergent formulations as described in 1) - 15) which contain a stabilized or encapsulated peracid, either as an additional component or as a substitute for already specified bleach systems. 3017) Detergent compositions as described in 1) , 3) , 7) , 9) and 12) wherein perborate is replaced by percarbonate. 18) Detergent compositions as described in 1) , 3) , 7) , 9) , 12) , 14) and 15) which additionally contain a manganese catalyst. 35 The manganese catalyst may, e.g., be one of the compounds described in "Efficient manganese catalysts for low-temperature bleaching". Nature, 369, p. 637-639, 1994. 19) Detergent composition formulated as a nonaqueous detergent 40 liquid comprising a liquid nonionic surfactant such as, e.g., linear alkoxylated primary alcohol, a builder system (e.g. phosphate), enzyme and alkali. The detergent may also comprise anionic surfactant and/or a bleach system. 45 The enzyme of interest of the invention may be incorporated in concentrations conventionally employed in detergents. It is at present contemplated that, in the detergent composition of the invention, the enzyme in question with reduced allergenicity may be added in an amount corresponding to 0.001-100 mg of enzyme per liter of wash liquor. Dishwashing composition The polypeptides of the invention with reduced allergenicity may also advantageously be used in dishwashing detergents. Dishwashing detergent compositions comprise a surfactant which may be anionic, non-ionic, cationic, amphoteric or a mixture of these types. The detergent will contain 0-90% of non-ionic surfactant such as low- to non-foaming ethoxylated propoxylated straight-chain alcohols. The detergent composition may contain detergent builder salts of inorganic and/or organic types. The detergent builders may be subdivided into phosphorus-containing and non-phosphorus- containing types. The detergent composition usually contains 1- 90% of detergent builders. Examples of phosphorus-containing inorganic alkaline detergent builders, when present, include the water-soluble salts especially alkali metal pyrophosphates, orthophosphates, and polyphosphates. An example of phosphorus-containing organic alkaline detergent builder, when present, includes the water- soluble salts of phosphonates. Examples of non-phosphorus- containing inorganic builders, when present, include water- soluble alkali metal carbonates, borates and silicates as well as the various types of water-insoluble crystalline or amor¬ phous alumino silicates of which zeolites are the best-known representatives. Examples of suitable organic builders include the alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium, citrates, succinates, malonates, fatty acid sulphonates, carboxymetoxy succinates, ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates, amino- polycarboxylates, polyacetyl carboxylates and polyhydroxysul- phonates. Other suitable organic builders include the higher molecular weight polymers and co-polymers known to have builder prop¬ erties, for example appropriate polyacrylic acid, polymaleic and polyacrylic/polymaleic acid copolymers and their salts. The dishwashing detergent composition may contain bleaching agents of the chlorine/bromine-type or the oxygen-type. Examples of inorganic chlorine/bromine-type bleaches are li¬ thium, sodium or calcium hypochlorite and hypobromite as well as chlorinated trisodium phosphate. Examples of organic chlo¬ rine/bromine-type bleaches are heterocyclic N-bromo and N- chloro imides such as trichloroisocyanuric, tribromoiso- cyanuric, dibromoisocyanuric and dichloroisocyanuric acids, and salts thereof with water-solubilizing cations such as potassium and sodium. Hydantoin compounds are also suitable. The oxygen bleaches are preferred, for example in the form of an inorganic persalt, preferably with a bleach precursor or as a peroxy acid compound. Typical examples of suitable peroxy bleach compounds are alkali metal perborates, both tetra- hydrates and monohydrates, alkali metal percarbonates, per- silicates and perphosphates. Preferred activator materials are TAED and glycerol triacetate. The dishwashing detergent composition of the invention may be stabilized using conventional stabilizing agents for the enzyme(s), e.g. a polyol such as e.g. propylene glycol, a sugar or a sugar alcohol, lactic acid, boric acid, or a boric acid derivative, e.g. an aromatic borate ester. The dishwashing detergent composition of the invention may also contain other conventional detergent ingredients, e.g. defloc- culant material, filler material, foam depressors, anti-corro¬ sion agents, soil-suspending agents, sequestering agents, anti- soil redeposition agents, dehydrating agents, dyes, bacteri- cides, fluorescers, thickeners and perfumes. Finally, the polypetide of the invention may be used in conven¬ tional dishwashing detergents, e.g. in any of the detergents described in any of the following patent publications: EP 518719, EP 518720, EP 518721, EP 516553, EP 516554, EP 516555, GB 2200132, DE 3741617, DE 3727911, DE 4212166, DE 4137470, DE 3833047, WO 93/17089, DE 4205071, WO 52/09680, WO 93/18129, WO 93/04153, WO 92/06157, WO 92/08777, EP 429124, WO 93/21299, US 5141664, EP 561452, EP 561446, GB 2234980, WO 93/03129, EP 481547, EP 530870, EP 533239, EP 554943, EP 346137, US 5112518, EP 318204, EP 318279, EP 271155, EP 271156, EP 346136, GB 2228945, CA 2006687, WO 93/25651, EP 530635, EP 414197, US 5240632. Textile applications Further polypeptides, including enzymes, of the invention with reduced allergenicity may be used in applications for purposes in the textile industry involving handling of enzyme granulates or powders. Examples of textile applications are listed below: i. Cellulolytic enzymes are widely used in the finishing of denim garments in order to provide a localized variation in the colour density of the fabric (Enzyme facilitated "stone wash") . ii. Bio-Polishing Also cellulolytic enzymes find use in the bio-polishing pro¬ cess. Bio-Polishing is a specific treatment of the yarn surface which improves fabric quality with respect to handle and ap¬ pearance without loss of fabric wettability. Bio-polishing may be obtained by applying the method described e.g. in WO 93/20278. iii. Desizing During the weaving of textiles, the threads are exposed to considerable mechanical strain. In order to prevent breaking, they are usually reinforced by coating (sizing) with a gelati¬ nous substance (size) . The most common sizing agent is starch in native or modified form. A uniform and durable finishing can thus be obtained only after removal of the size from the fabric, the socalled desizing. Desizing of fabrics sized with a size containing starch or modified starch is preferably facilitated by use of amylolytic enzymes. iiii. Bleach clean-up In bleach clean-up catalases may serve to remove excess hydrogen peroxide. iiiii. Silk degumming Removal of gum on silk fibers with protease. (Application sheet "Novo Enzymes for Silk Degumming" is available on request) Personal care applications Also in the personal care technical field polypeptides accord- ing to the invention are of interest. In the following are listed examples of uses. 1) Proteases: Proteases are well-known active ingredients for cleaning of contact lenses. They hydrolyse the proteinaceous soil on the lens and thereby makes it soluble. Removal of the protein soil is essential for the wearing comfort. Proteases are also effective ingredients in skin cleaning products, where they remove the upper layer of dead keratina- seous skin cells and thereby makes the skin look brighter and more fresh. Proteases are also used in oral care products, especially for cleaning of dentures, but also in dentifrices. 2) Lipases: Lipases can be applied for cosmetic use as active ingredients in skin cleaning products and anti-acne products for removal of excessive skin lipids, and in creams and lotions as active ingredients for skin care. Lipases can also be used in hair cleaning products (e.g. shampoos) for effective removal of sebum and other fatty material from the surface of hair. Lipases are also effective ingredients in products for cleaning of contact lenses, where they remove lipid deposits from the lens surface. 3) Oxidoreductases: There are many well-known Personal Care applications of oxidoreductases. The most common is an oxidase (usually glucoseoxidase) with substrate (e.g. glucose) that ensures production of H 2 0 2 , which then will initiate the oxidation of for instance SCN * or I" into antimicrobial reagents (SCNO ' or I 2 ) by a peroxidase (usually lactoperoxidase) . This enzymatic complex is known in nature from e.g. milk and saliva. It is being utilised commercially as antimicrobial system in oral care products (mouth rinse, dentifrice, chewing gum) where it also can be combined with an amyloglucosidase to produce the glucose. These systems are also known in cosmetic products for preservation. Antimicrobial systems comprising the combination of an oxidase and a peroxidase are know in the cleaning of contact lenses. Other applications of oxidoreductases are the application of oxidases, peroxidases and laccases in oxidative hair dyeing. Further, free radicals formed on the surface of the skin (and hair) known to be associated with the ageing process of the skin (spoilage of the hair) . The free radicals activate chain reactions that lead to destruction of fatty membranes, collagen, and cells. The application of free radical scavengers such as Superoxide dismutase into cosmetics is well-known(R.L. Goldcnnberg, DCI, NOV. 93, 48-52). Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) is also an oxidoreductase. It can be utilised for waving of hair (reduction and reoxidation of disulfide bonds in hair) and repair of spoiled hair (where the damage is mainly reduction of existing disulfide bonds) . 4) Glucanases/Carbohydrases. Plaque formed on the surface of teeth are composed mainly of polysaccharides. They stick to the surface of the teeth and the microorganisms. The polysaccharides are mainly α-1,6 bound glucose (dextran) and α-1,3 bound glucose (mutan) . The applica¬ tion of different types of glucanases such as mutanase and dextranase helps hydrolysing the sticky matrix of plaque, making it easier to remove by mechanical action. Also other kinds of biofilm for instance the biofilm formed in lens cases can be removed by the action of glucanases. 5) Antimicrobial polypeptides. Antimicrobial polypeptides have widespread applications such as preservation of cosmetic products, anti-acne products, deodor¬ ants and shampoos. Food and Feed The polypeptides with reduced allergenicity according to the invention may further advantageously be used in food- and feedstuff. Specifically relevant polypeptides are enzymes selected from the group of proteases, jS-glucanases, amylases, pectinases, α-galactosidases, phytases, xylanases and lipases. Use of Zipper domains Finally the invention relates to the use of Zipper.domains for reducing allergenicity of polypeptides and may be any molecules capable of self-oligomerizing microbially expressed polypeptides. Examples of a number of Zipper domains have already been described previously. In an embodiment the Zipper domain is a Leucine Zipper. The Leucine Zipper may be any known Leucine Zipper which, grafted to a polypeptide, is capable of self-oligomerizing as a result of association of parallel α-helical coils of two or more Leucine Zippers. In a specific embodiment the Leucine Zipper is the yeast transcriptional factor GCN4 or modifications thereof. If it is desired to obtain a hetero-dimeric molecule the Zipper domain may advantageously be a Fos Leucine Zipper and a Jun Leucine Zipper. In another embodiment of the invention the Zipper domain is a four helical bundle or a modification thereof. The Zipper domains may advantageously be used for reducing allergenicity of polypeptides in detergents, household articles, agrochemicals, personal care products, cosmetics, toiletry, pharmaceuticals, composition used for treating textiles, food and feed etc. Specificially the polypeptides comprising at least one Zipper domain may advantageously be used in compositions and/or in context with e.g. the industrial applications previously described. The present invention is further illustrated in the following examples which should not, in any manner, be considered to limit the scope of the present invention. METHODS AND MATERIALS Host cells: Escherichia coli JM105 (Yanisch-Perron et al. Gene, 33, p. 5103-119, 1985) Epicurian coli' XLl-Blue Cells (Stratagene Cloning Systems, Ca., USA) Escherichia coli MC1061 (Casadaban, M.J. et al., J. Mol.Biol. 138, p. 179-207, 1980) . 0 Vector: The pFab3 expression vector is the ancestor of pFab4 (ørum, H. et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 21, p. 4491-4498, 1993). The vector contains a pelB signal sequence (Lei et al., J. of Bac- 5 teriol, vol. 169, p. 4379-4383, 1987) which is under control of the inducible lacZ promoter. A Sfil site in the pelB signal makes it possible to clone the desired sequence, so that the geneproduct will be expressed In Frame with the signal sequen¬ ce. 0 Parts of the pFab3 vector was not relevant for this study wherefor it was removed by Sfil and Xroal digestion. These sites were then used as sites for introducing the PCR fragment as described below. In contrast to the referred pFab4, pFab3 con- 5 tains 131 bp region between the start codons of the lacZ and the pelB signal. Primers: 0 A-termamyl (SEQ ID NO 9): 5'-CA GTC ACA GAT CCT CGC GAA TTG GCC CAG CCG GCC ATG GCC GCA AAT CTT AAT GGG ACG CTG ATG-3' B-termamyl SEO ID NO 101 : 55'- CAT TCG CGA GGA CCC GGG CGG GGT GGA CGG TTT CGG TCT TTG AAC ATA AAT TGA AAC CGA CCC-3' The underlined nucleotides correspond to the termamyl sequence. Primer A-termamyl also includes the Sfil restriction site and the last two codons of the pelB signal. Primer B-termamyl includes a linker sequence (a short hinge domain of IgG3) (PlUckthun, A. et al.. Biochemistry, 31, p. 1579-1584, 51992) and a Xmal cloning site. Plasmids: pDN1528 (PCT/DK94/00370) 0 Signal sequence: pelB (Lei et al., J. of Bacteriol, vol. 169, p. 4379-4383, 1987) Linker sequence: 5 Part of IgG 3 hinge (PlUckthun, A. et al., Biochemistry, 31, p. 1579-1584, 1992) Materials: fmol™ DNA-sequencing system (Cat. :#Q4100, Promega Corporation, 0 WI, USA) . α-amylase EPS assay (Cat. :#1442295, Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) Enzvmes: 5 Termamyl® (available from Novo Nordisk A/S) Sfil (Cat. :#R6391, Promega Corporation, WI, USA) Xmal (Cat. :#R6491, Promega Corporation, WI, USA) Sad (Cat. :#R6061, Promega Corporation, WI, USA) T4-DNA ligase (Cat. :#M1801, Promega Corporation, WI, USA) 0 AmpliTaq® DNA Polymerase (PartNo. :N801-0060, Perkin Elmer, Roche Molecular Systems, New Jersey, USA.) Solutions: PCR reaction buffer: dNTP(0.25mM of each), MgCl 2 2.5mM and 5 lx PCR reaction buffer-II (PartNo. :N808-0009, Perkin Elmer, Roche Molecular Systems, New Jersey, USA.) T4-DNA ligase buffer (Cat. :#M1801, Promega Corporation, WI, USA) SOC medium (Sambrook, J. et al., 1989, Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Second edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, USA ) 2xTY medium (Ausubel, F.M. et al. (Editors) , 1994 LB-agar Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John LB-medium Wiley & Sons, Inc. and Greene Publishing Asso¬ ciates, Inc., New York, USA) PEG-8000 (Cat. :#P2139, Sigma Chemical Company, MO, USA). PBS tween 20 Ausubel, F.M. et al. (Editors), 1994 Alkaline phosphatase Buffer (pH-9.0) NaCl 5.844 g MgCl 2 ,6H 2 0 1.02 g Diethanol amine 10.51 g The pH is adjusted to 9.0 with HCl, and Milli-Q water is applied to 1 litre. Stop-solution EDTA, disodium 74.44 g K 2 HP0 4 174.2 g NAH 3 0.2 g The pH is adjusted to 10 with about 22.5 g KOH in Milli-Q water to 1 litre. Equipment: Bio-Rad E. coli pulser(#165-2103,Bio-Rad Laboratories, Ca., USA) Horizon 11.14 Agarose Gel apparatus. (#580-1068IL, Life Tech¬ nologies, Inc.,MD, USA). Applied Biosystems 394 DNA/RNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) . Thermocycler Varius V 45(Hans Landgraf, GmbH, Langenhagen, Germany.) Mini-PROTEAN II Electrophoresis Cell (#165-2940,Bio-Rad Labora¬ tories, Ca., USA) The Semi Dry Electroblotter (JKA-Biotech, Denmark) HiTrap™ chelating column (Code no. 17-0409-01, Pharmacia LKB, Biotechnology AB, Uppsala, Sweden) ELISA reader: Ceres 900 HDi Methods : All general techniques are performed according to Sambrook, J. et al., Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Second edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, USA, 1989, and/or according to Ausubel, F.M, et al. (Editors), Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and Greene Publishing Associates, Inc.,New York, USA, 1994) Geneclean II procedure (BIO 101, Inc., CA, USA). PCR amplification of the gene encoding Termamvl®. The PCR reaction is performed in 50 μl volume PCR reaction- buffer, 1 μM of each primer A- and B-termamyl and 10 ng of the DNA template. Reaction mixtures are overlaid with mineral oil and kept at 94°C for 5 minutes. Then 0.5 μl of AmpliTaq® (5 U/μl) is added. The mixtures are kept at annealing temperature 70°C for 5 minu¬ tes and at elongation temperature 72°C for 2 minutes. After this initial incubation the mixtures cycle 30 times (94°C 1 minute, 70°C 1 minute, 72°C 1 minute) followed by incubation at 72°C for 10 minutes using a PCR Thermocycler Varius V 45. Preparation of a sequence encoding Leucine Zipper from GCN4 and linker The four oligonucleotides are synthesized on Applied Biosystems 394 DNA/RNA synthesizer according to protocols of the supplier. After synthesis the oligonucleotides are purified using denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis according to (Ausubel, F.M. et al., supra, 1994). 20 pmol of each oligo¬ nucleotide are mixed in a total volume of 40 μl of 100 mM NaCl, annealed by incubation at 95°C for 5 minutes and cooled slowly to 16°C over a period of 3 hours, this annealing mixture is used in ligation. The four oligonucleotides are as follows: Antisense Zip Cvs ( 1) tXmal-SacI) rSEO ID NO 31 5'-CA GCC CCC ACA GCC CCC ACG TTC ACC AAC AAG CTT TTT CAG ACG AGC AAC TTC GTT TTC CAG GTG GTA G-3' Antisense Zip (2 ) . fXmal-SacI fSEO ID NO 41 5'-p-TT TTT GGA CAG CAG TTC TTC AAC TTT GTC TTC CAG CTG TTT CAT TCG CGA GGA C-3' Sense Zip .11. (Xmal-Sacli fSEO ID NO 51 5'-CCG GGT CCT CGC GAA TGA AAC AGC TGG AAG ACA AAG TTG AAG AAC TGC TGT CCA AAA ACT ACC ACC-3' Sense Zip Cvs (2 ) . (Xmal-Sacl fSEO ID NO 61 5'-P-TG GAA AAC GAA GTT GCT CGT CTG AAA AAG CTT GTT GGT GAA CGT GGG GGC TGT GGG GGC TGA GCT-3' P indicates oligonucleotides with a phosphoryl group at the 5'-ends. Transformation of XL-1 blue E. coli The transformation is carried out by electroporation. For this purpose Epicurian coli * XLl-Blue Electroporation competent Cells are used, 3 μl of ligated DNA is used per 80 μl of cells. The electroporation is performed using a Bio-Rad E. coli pulser set at 25 μF, 2.5 kV and 200 Ohms. Transformation of E. coli JM105 Transformation of E. coli JM105 is done by adding 3 μl of the ligation mixture per 100 μl of heat-shock competent cells. The preparation and transformation of the cells are made essential¬ ly as described in (Sambrook et al. 1989, supra.) Expression and isolation of periplasmic polypeptides. The expression of Termamyl®-dimer in E. coli JM105 is done as follows. An overnight culture of JM105 harbouring the pAZ-l plasmid in 2XTY medium with 100 μg/ml Ampicillin and 1% D(+)Glucose is prepared by transferring a single colony to the media and incubating this at 37°C for 16 hours with vigorously shaking. 100 μl of this is used as starter culture of 100 ml 2XTY medium with 100 μg/ml Ampicillin and 0.1% D(+)-Glucose, which in a 1 L shake flask is incubated at 37°C with vigorously shaking. When OD550=1.0 is reached, the temperature is adjusted to 30 β C and the expression is induced by adding isopropyl-3-D- thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of within 1-5 mM. The induction is carried out for 5 hours, then the cells are pelleted by gentle centrifugation and given an osmotic shock for releasing the polypeptides present in the periplasmic space of the cells. This can be performed according to the procedure of Neu, H.C. and Heppel, L.A. , J. Biol. Chem. 240, p. 3685-3692, 1965. Characterization of expressed Termamvl®-Zipper dimer The periplasmic fraction of induced and non-induced cells harbouring the pAZ-1 plasmid are analyzed on an SDS-page gel 4- 20% Acrylamide (Laemmeli, Nature, 227, p. 680, 1970) using the Mini-Protean II (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Ca, USA) . Samples are run with or without reducing agent dithiothreitol. Dithiothreitol (DTT) also termed Clelands reagent is a reducing agent capable of quantitatively reducing disulfide bonds (Cle- land, W.W., Biochemistry, 3, p. 480, 1964). One gel is stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G250 according to (Neuhoff, et al., Electrophoresis, 9, p. 255-262, 1988) and another gel is used for blotting the polypeptides onto a PVDF membrane Imobil- lin-P * (Cat. :#IPVH 20200, Millipore Corporation, MA, USA) using The Semidry Electroblotter. The membranes are probed using anti-Termamyl antibodies raised in rabbits against the Terma- myl® as the primary antibody (as described in Ausubel, F.M. et al. chapter 11 section 12 and 13, supra. 1994) and anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase conjugated (Cat. :L42007, medac, GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) as secondary antibody. The polypeptides are detected ' with ECL™ Western blotting detection reagent (Cat. :#RPN2106, Amersham Int., Buckinghamshire, England) and recording the light emission on ordinary X-ray film. Purification of Termamvl® Zipper dimer The expressed Termamyl® Zipper dimer was purified from the fermentation broth. This was done using the attached poly-His tail as the affinity tag. More specifically the purification was performed using a 5 ml HiTrap™ chelating column according to the recommodations of the supplier. Further details concern¬ ing the IMAC (Immobbilized Metal Affinity Chromatography) procedure is describe in Yip et al., (1994), Molecular Biotechnology, vol. 1, p. 151-164; Fatiadi et al., (1987), CRC Critical Rev. Anal. Chem. 18, p. 1-44. Protein determination After purification and dialysis of the Termamyl® Zipper dimer sample, spectral measurements were performed. The optical density of the sample at 280 nm were used to calculate the protein concentration of the sample. For this purpose the Lambert Beer law was used together with the calculated protein extinction coefficient of the Termamyl® Zipper dimer using the principals for this as described by Gill et al. Analytical Biochemistry, 182, p. 319-326, 1989. ELISA procedure for determination of IgG, positive guinea pigs ELISA microtiter plates are coated with rabbit anti-Termamyl® AAN 4080 K 452-453 1:4000 in carbonate buffer and incubated over night at 4°C. The next day the plates is blocked with 2% BSA for 1 hour and washes 3 times with PBS tween 20. Termamyl® PPX 3328 1 μg enzyme protein/ml is applied to the plates, incubated for 1 hour and then washed 3 times with PBS tween 20. All guinea pig samples are applied to the ELISA plates with 25 μl sera and 25 μl PBS buffer, incubated for 3 hours and washed 3 times with PBS tween 20. Then goat anti-guinea pig IgG, (diluted to 1:4000 in PBS buffer) is applied to the plates, incubated for 1 hour and washed 3 times with PBS tween 20. Alkaline phosphatase rabbit anti-goat is applied (diluted to 1:8000) and incubated for 1 hour, washed 2 times in PBS tween 20 and 1 time with diethanol amine buffer. The alkaline phophatase is developed using p-nitrophenyl phosphate for 30 minutes at 37°C and stopped with cal¬ cium/sodium buffer comprising EDTA (pH=10) and read at OD 405/650 using a ELISA reader. 6 double blinds are included on all ELISA plates. Positive and negative sera values are calculated as the avarage blind values added 2 times the standard deviation. This gives an accuracy of 95%. The test is described more thoroughly in ED-9515452 available on request from Novo Nordisk A/S. EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1 PCR amplification and cloning of the gene encoding Termamyl®. The primers A-termamyl and B-termamyl were designed and synthesized on Applied Biosystems 394 DNA/RNA synthesizer. The Termamyl® encoding gene was PCR amplified using the plasmid pDN1528 containing the gene encoding Termamyl® as a template. The PCR product, a 1.5 kb fragment, was purified by preparative agarose electrophoresis followed by the Geneclean-II procedure (BIO 101, Inc., Ca., USA). EXAMPLE 2 Cloning of PCR product The purified 1.5 kb DNA fragment containing the sequence enco¬ ding Termamyl® was digested with 10 U of Sfil per μg DNA at 50°C for 2 hours with the reaction mixture overlaid by mineral oil. Following the Geneclean-ll procedure the DNA fragment was further digested for 2 hours at 37°C with 10 U Xmal per μg DNA. The digested DNA was again purified using Geneclean-II proce¬ dures and finally ligated to the prepared Sfil and Xmal dige- sted pFab3. The 10 μl ligation mixture included 0.2 μg of in¬ sert DNA and 0.2 μg of digested vector pFab3. The ligation was performed for 2 hours at 16°C and 14 hours at 4°C with 1 U of T4-DNA ligase. The ligated material was used to transform Epicurian coli' XL1- Blue Electroporation competent Cells as described above. EXAMPLE 3 Identification of correct clones Immediately after the electroporation l ml of freshly made SOC medium was added and the transformed cells were vigorously shaken for 1 hour at 37°C, plated onto LB-agar plates contain- ing 100 μg/ml Ampicillin and 12.5 μg/ml Tetracyclin and incuba¬ ted overnight at 37°C. The next day clones were picked random¬ ly, transferred to 14 ml polypropylene tubes containing 2 ml of LB medium containing 100 μg/ml Ampicillin and 12.5 μg/ml Tetra¬ cyclin. After overnight incubation at 37°C and shaking at 250 rpm, plasmid DNA minipreps were prepared according to Sambrook et al., supra. 1989. The isolated plasmid DNA was analyzed by digestion with Sfil and Xmal and the digested plasmid DNA was analyzed on 1% agarose, lxTBE gel. The appearance of a DNA fragment of 1.5 kb indicated the exi¬ stence of clones containing the correct fragment size. Further verification of the cloned gene was done as DNA sequencing using the fmol™ DNA-sequencing system from Promega Corporation. A construct with the correct DNA sequence of Termamyl® was named pAZ- . EXAMPLE 4 Leucine Zipper Introduction of a sequence encoding the Leucine Zipper of GCN4 a Yeast transcriptional activator (O'Shea et al. Science, 243, p. 538-542, 1989) and also encoding a flexible C-terminal extension peptide containing a Cysteine amino acid residue was carried out using four overlapping oligonucleotides (see methods section) . For ligation 5 μl of the annealing mixture was added to the T4-DNA-ligase buffer to which was added 5% PEG-8000, 1 Unit of T4-DNA ligase and 0.1 pmol of Xmal and Sad digested pAZ- . The ligated material was used to transform E. coli JM105 as described above. EXAMPLE 5 Identification of clones containing the Termamγl®-Leucine Zipper construct Immediately after the transformation 1 ml of freshly made SOC medium was added and the cells were vigorously shaken for 1 hour at 37°C, plated onto selective plates and incubated over¬ night at 37°C. The next day clones were picked randomly, transferred to 14 ml polypropylene tubes containing 2 ml of LB medium containing 100 μg/ml Ampicillin. After overnight incubation at 37°C and sha¬ king at 250 rpm, plasmid DNA minipreps were prepared according to (Sambrook et al., supra. 1989). The isolated plasmid DNA was analyzed by digestion with Nrul (introduced by the Leucine Zipper DNA fragment) , the digested and non-digested plasmid DNA were analyzed on 1% agarose, IxTBE gel. The appearance of line¬ arized plasmid of 4606 bp in Nrul digested samples indicated the existence of clones comprising the Leucine Zipper fragment. Further verification of the cloned fragment was done by sequ- encing using the fmol™ DNA-sequencing system from Promega Cor¬ poration. EXAMPLE 6 Expression of dimerized Termamvl® JM105 cells harbouring the plasmid pAZ-1 were induced to express the fusion polypeptide pelB signal-Termamyl®-Linker- Leucine Zipper as described above. Each fusion polypeptide dimerize with other identical fusion polypeptides during ex¬ pression. Cells were given osmotic shock in order to release proteins present in the periplasma. Aliquots of the isolate from both induced and non-induced cells were analyzed on SDS- PAGE. Samples were analyzed under reducing (sample with DTT) and non-reducing (sample without DTT) conditions. Polypeptide bands were visualised by staining with Coomassie Blue dye. Non- reduced samples of induced cells showed a distinct band at approximately 120 kDa (see figure 3) a band not present in samples of non-induced cells. Reduced samples from induced cells showed a distinct band at approximately 60 kDa, while at the same time no band was seen at 120 kDa (see figure 4) . In samples of non-induced cells no 60 kDa band were seen. A gel similar to the above were used to transfer the proteins to a PVDF membrane via a Western blot procedure, as described above. The 120 kDa band of non-reduced samples was specifically recognized as Termamyl® confirming the expression of Termamyl® as a dimer (see figure 5) . EXAMPLE 7 α-amylase activity of unourified Termamyl-Dimer. As a test for α-amylase activity of the Termamyl®-dimer, a sample of the periplasmic isolate was analyzed. It was esti¬ mated by electrophoretic analysis that this sample contained about 0.5 mg/ml of Termamyl®-dimer. Dilutions of the sample were tested in an α-amylase assay (see the Materials and Methods section) and compared to dilutions of Termamyl® of known activity. This assay revealed that the dimer retained more than 50% of the wild-type activity. EXAMPLE 8 Introduction of a purification tag To obtain a more pure expression product a purification tag was introduced at the C-terminal part of the Termamyl®-Zipper pro¬ tein as an in-frame insertion between the Xma I and Sad sites of pAZ- . This resulted in a nucleotide sequence encoding the Termamyl®-Zipper protein with a C-terminal tail consisiting of a Factor Xa site and the amino acid sequence His-His-His (see sequence data) . Four oligonucleotides were used for this purpose (See below) . The four oligonucleotides were synthesized on Applied Biosyst¬ ems 394 DNA/RNA synthesizer according to protocols of the supp- lier. After synthesis, the oligonucleotides were purified using denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis according to (Ausubel, F.M. et al., supra. 1994). 20 pmol of each oligonucleotide were mixed with a total volume of 40 μl of 100 mM NaCl, annealed by incubation at 95°C for 5 minutes and cooled slowly to 16°C over a period of 3 hours. This annealing mixture was used for ligation. The four oligo¬ nucleotides were as follows: Antisense Zip-Xa-His (Xmal-Sacll (SEQ ID NO 71 5'-CA ATG GTG ATG ACG ACC TTC GAT GCC CCC ACA GCC CCC ACG TTC ACC AAC AAG CTT TTT CAG ACG AGC AAC TTC GTT TTC CAG GTG GTA G- 3' Antisense Zip. fXmal-SacIl (SEQ ID NO 41 5'-P-TT TTT GGA CAG CAG TTC TTC AAC TTT GTC TTC CAG CTG TTT CAT TCG CGA GGA C-3' Sense Zip. fXmal-SacIl (SEQ ID NO 51 5'-CCG GGT CCT CGC GAA TGA AAC AGC TGG AAG ACA AAG TTG AAG AAC TGC TGT CCA AAA ACT ACC ACC-3' Sense Zip-Xa-His. fXmal-SacIl tSEO ID NO 81 5'-P-TG GAA AAC GAA GTT GCT CGT CTG AAA AAG CTT GTT GGT GAA CGT GGG GGC TGT GGG GGC ATC GAA GGT CGT CAT CAC CAT TGA GCT-3' P indicates oligonucleotides with a phosphoryl group at the 5'-ends. The oligonucleotides were designed to have extruding overhangs when hybridized: one matching the Xmal site and one matching the Sad site of pAZ- . The preperation of the pAZ-% for ligation with the hybridized oligonucleotides, the actual ligation and transformation of competent E. coli JM105, were performed essentially as described in example 4 and in the Met¬ hods and Materials-section. From this transformation positive clones were identified as described in Example 5 and again the DNA sequence was verified by DNA sequencing. Further, dimer Termamyl® was expressed as described in Example 6. EXAMPLE 9 Allergenicity trails of dimer Termamvl® 20 Dun in Hartley guinea pigs were exposed to 1.0 μg monomer Termamyl® and 1.0 μg dimer Termamyl® by intratracheal dosage as described ED-9513462 available on request from Novo Nordisk A/S. All guinea pigs were tested for the production of IgG, (indicat¬ ing an allergic response) during 8 days using the ELISA procedure described above. Figure 6 shows the number of Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs found IgG, positive during the trail period. It can be seen from figure 6 the number of guinea pigs being IgG, positive at any time during the trial period is reduced for the dimer Termamyl® in comparison to the monomer Termamyl®. This proves that the allergenicity of Termamyl® can be reduced by coupling Termamyl® to a Zipper domain. SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INF0R4ATI N: (i) APPLICANT: (A) NAME: Nσvo Nαπϋsk A/S (B) STREET: Nσvo Alle (C) CITY: Bagsvaerd (E) XXMIKY: Denmark (F) POSTAL OCDE (ZIP) : EK-2880 (G) TEXHHUE: 445 4444 8888 (H) TELEFAX: 445 4449 3256 (ii) TTIX-E OF INVENTION: A process far the production of polypeptides (iϋ) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 10 (iv) σCMPUTER READABLE FCtiM: (A) MEDUM TYPE: Floppy disk (B) OCMFUTER: IEM PC axpatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-∞S/MS-DOS (D) SOFTWARE: Pateπtln Release #1.0, Version #1.3OB (EPO) (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 1: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) UE- G H: 1593 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) SHRANDECNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linaar (ii) MX-EEUIE TYPE: cCNA (iii) HXPOTHETICAL: O (iv) ANH-SENSE: NO (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: CDS (B) DXA_π N:1. .1593 (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 1: GCA AAT CTT AAT GGG ACG CIG ATC CAG TAT TTT GAA TOG TAC ATC C0C 48 Ala Asn Leu Asn Gly Thr Leu Met Gin Tyr Fhe Glu Trp Tyr Met Pro 1 5 10 15 AAT GAC GGC CAA CAT TOG A3G CGT TIG CAA AAC GAC TOG GCA TAT TIG 96 Asn Asp Gly Gn His Trp Arg Arg Leu Gin Asn Asp Ser Ala lyr Leu 20 25 30 GCT GAA CAC GGT ATT ACT GCC GTC TOG ATT CCC COG GCA TAT AAG GGA 144 Ala Glu His Gly lie Thr Ala Val Trp He Pro Pro Ala Tyr Iys Gly 35 40 45 AOG AGC CAA GOG GAT GTG GGC TAC GGT GCT TAC GAC CTT TAT GAT TEA 192 Thr Ser Gin Ala Asp Val Gly Tyr Gly Ala Tyr Asp Leu Tyr Asp Leu 50 55 60 GO3GAGTTTC3TCAAAAAGGGAα3GTT0QGACAAAGTAC GGC ACA AAA 240 Gly Glu Hie His Gin lys Gly Thr Val Arg Thr lys Tyr Gly Thr lys 65 70 75 80 GGA GAG CTG CAA TCT GOG ATC AAA ACT CTT CAT ICC GGC GAC ATC AAC 288 Gly Glu Leu Gin Ser Ala lie Lys Ser Leu His Ser Arg Asp lie Asn 85 90 95 σTTTACC<»GATσiGσiCATCAACσ^AAAGGCGGCGCTGATG^ 336 Val Tyr Gly Asp Val Val lie Asn His lys Gly Gly Ala Asp Ala Thr 100 105 110 GAA GAT GTA AOC GOG GTT GAA GTC GAT CCC GCT GAC CGC AAC OGC GTA 384 Glu Asp Val Thr Ala Val Glu Val Aεp Pro Ala Asp Arg Asn Arg Val 115 120 125 ATT TCA GGA GAA CAC CIA ATT AAA GCC TGG ACA CAT T T CAT TTT COG 432 lie Ser Gly Glu His Leu lie lys Ala Trp Thr His Fhe His Fhe Pro 130 135 140 GGG GGC GGC AGC ACA TACAGCGATTITAAATGGCATTGGTACCATTTT 480 Gly Arg Gly Ser Thr Tyr Ser Asp Fhe lys Trp His Trp Tyr His Hie 145 150 155 160 GAC GGA ACC GAT TG GAC GAG TOC OGA AAG CTC AAC CGC ATC TAT AAG 528 Asp Gly Thr Asp Trp Asp Glu Ser Arg lys Leu Asn Arg He Tyr lys 165 170 175 TTT CAA GGA AAG GCT TGG GAT TOG GAA GTT TOC AAT GAA AAC GGC AAC 576 She Gin Gly lys Ala Trp Asp Trp Glu Veil Ser Asn Glu Asn Gly Asn 180 185 190 TAT GAT TAT T G ATC TAT GCC GAC ATC GAT TAT GAC CAT CCT GAT GTC 624 Tyr Asp Tyr Leu Met T r Ala Asp lie Asp Tyr Aεp His Pro Asp Val 195 200 205 GCA GCΆGAAM A^ A^TGG GGCACΓ TOG T GCCAOT G^ CΠ C^ 672 Ala Ala Glu lie lys Arg Trp Gly Thr Trp Tyr Ala Asn Glu Leu Gin 210 215 220 TTC GAC GGT T C CGT CTT GAT GCT GTC AAA CAC ATT AAA TTT TCT TTT 720 Leu Asp Gly Fhe Arg Leu Asp Ala Val lys His lie lys Phe Ser Fhe 225 230 235 240 TTC GOG GAT TGG GTT AAT CAT GTC AGG GAA AAA ACG GGG AAG GAA ATC 768 Leu Arg Asp Trp Val Asn His Val Arg Glu lys Thr Gly lys Glu Met 245 250 255 T_TTAθ;GTAGCTGMTATTGSC2GAATC«CTrcG∞ 816 Fhe Thr Val Ala Glu Tyr Trp Gin Asn Asp Leu Gly Ala Leu Glu Asn 260 265 270 TAT TTG AAC AAA ACA AAT TTT AAT CAT TCA GTC TTT GAC GTC COG CUT 864 Tyr Leu Asn lys Thr Asn Fhe Asn His Ser Val Fhe Asp Val Pro Leu 275 280 285 CAT TAT CAG TTC CAT GCT GCA TOG ACA CAG GGA GGC GGC TAT GAT ATC 912 His Tyr Gin Fhe His Ala Ala Ser Thr Gin Gly Gly Gly Tyr Asp Met 290 295 300 AGG AAA TTC CTC AAC GGT ACG GTC GTT TOC AAG CAT GOG TTC AAA TOG 960 Arg lys Leu Leu Asn Gly Thr Val Val Ser Lys His Pro Leu Lys Ser 305 310 315 320 GFT ACA TTT GTC GAT AAC CAT GAT ACA CAG COS GGG CAA TOG CTT GAG 1008 Val Thr Fhe Val Asp Asn His Asp Thr Gin Pro Gly Gin Ser Leu Glu 325 330 335 TOG ACT GTC CAA ACA TOG TTT AAG COG CTT GCT TAC GCT TTT ATT CTC 1056 Ser Thr Val Gin Thr Trp Fhe lys Pro Leu Ala Tyr Ala Fhe He Leu 340 345 350 ACA AGG GAA TCT GGA TAC CCT CAG GTT TTC TAC GGG GAT ATC TAC GGG 1104 Thr Arg Glu Ser Gly Tyr I*o Gin Val Fhe Tyr Gly Asp Met Tyr Gly 355 360 365 ACG AAA GGA GAC TOC CW3 GGC GAA ATT CCT GCC TTC AAA CAC AAA ATT 1152 Thr lys Gly Asp Ser Gin Arg Glu He Pro Ala Leu Lys His lys He 370 375 380 GAACCGATCTIAAAACCGAGAAAACAGTATGCGTACGGAC«^ 1200 Glu Pro He Leu Lys Ala Arg lys Gin Tyr Ala Tyr Gly Ala Gin His 385 390 395 400 GAT TAT TTC GAC CAC CAT GAC ATT GTC GGC TOG ACA AGG GAA GGC GAC 1248 Asp Tyr Fhe Asp His His Asp He Val Gly Trp Thr Arg Glu Gly Asp 405 410 415 AGC TOG GTT GCA AAT TCA GGT TTC GOG GCA TTA AXA ACA GAC GGA CCC 1296 Ser Ser Val Ala Asn Ser Gly Leu Ala Ala Leu He Thr Asp Gly Pro 420 425 430 GGT GGG GCA AAG GGA ATC TAT GTC GGC OQG CAA AAC GCC GGT GAG ACA 1344 Gly Gly Ala lys Arg Met Tyr Val Gly Arg Gin Asn Ala Gly Glu Thr 435 440 445 TGG CAT GAC ATT ACC GGA AAC CGT TOG GAG OOG GTT GTC ATC AAT TOG 1392 Trp His Asp He Thr Gly Asn Arg Ser Glu Pro Val Val He Asn Ser 450 455 460 GAA GGC TOG GGA GAG TTT CAC GTA AAC GGC GGG TOG GTT TCA ATT TAT 1440 Glu Gly Trp Gly Glu Fhe His Val Asn Gly Gly Ser Val Ser He Tyr 465 470 475 480 COTCAAAGACCGA-ΛCCGTOCAOCCαSCCCGGGTCCTCGC^ 1488 Val Gin Arg Fto lys Pro Ser Thr Pro Pro Gly Ser Ser Arg Met lys 485 490 495 CAGCTCGAAGACAAAGππTGAAGAACTC 1536 Gin Leu Glu Asp lys Val Glu Glu Leu Leu Ser lys Asn Tyr His Leu 500 505 510 G AACG^COTGCTCCTCIGAAAAAGCITGITGCTGAACCTGGGGGC 1584 Glu Asn Glu Val Ala Arg Leu Lys Lys Leu Val Gly Glu Arg Gly Gly 515 520 525 TGT GGG GGC 1593 Cys Gly Gly 530 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 2: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) I_ENGTH: 531 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (D) TOPOLOGY: • Hr-anw (ii) M3L-BCULE TYPE: protein (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 2: Ala Asn Leu Asn Gly Thr Leu Met Gin Tyr Fhe Glu Trp Tyr Met Pro 1 5 10 15 Asn Asp Gly Gin His Trp Arg Arg Leu Gin Asn Asp Ser Ala Tyr Leu 20 25 30 Ala Glu His Gly He Thr Ala Val Trp He Pro Pro Ala Tyr lys Gly 35 40 45 Thr Ser Gin Ala Asp Val Gly Tyr Gly Ala Tyr Aεp Leu Tyr Asp Leu 50 55 60 Gly Glu Fhe His Gin lys Gly Thr Val Arg Thr lys Tyr Gly Thr lys 65 70 75 80 Gly Glu Leu Gin Ser Ala He lys Ser Leu His Ser Arg Asp He Asn 85 90 95 Val Tyr Gly Asp Val Val He Asn His lys Gly Gly Ala Asp Ala Thr 100 105 H0 Glu Asp Val Thr Ala Val Glu Val Asp Pro Ala Asp Arg Asn Arg Val 115 120 125 He Ser Gly Glu His Leu He Lys Ala Trp Thr His Fhe His Fhe Pro 130 135 140 Gly Arg Gly Ser Thr Tyr Ser Asp Fhe lys Trp His Trp Tyr His Fhe 145 150 155 160 Aεp Gly Thr Asp Trp Asp Glu Ser Arg Lys Leu Asn Arg He Tyr lys 165 170 175 Fhe Gin Gly Lys Ala Trp Asp Trp Glu Val Ser Asn Glu Asn Gly Asn 180 185 190 Tyr Asp Tyr Leu Met Tyr Ala Aεp He Asp Tyr Asp His Pro Asp Val 195 200 205 Ala Ala Glu He Lys Arg Trp Gly Thr Trp Tyr Ala Asn Glu Leu Gin 210 215 220 Leu Asp Gly Fhe Arg Leu Asp Ala Val Lys His He Lys Fhe Ser Fhe 225 230 235 240 Leu Arg Asp Trp Val Asn His Val Arg Glu lys Thr Gly lys Glu Met 245 250 255 Fhe Thr Val Ala Glu Tyr Trp Gin Asn Asp Leu Gly Ala Leu Glu Asn 260 265 270 Tyr Leu Asn Lys Thr Asn Fhe Asn His Ser Val Fhe Asp Val Pro Leu 275 280 285 His Tyr Gin Fhe His Ala Ala Ser Thr Gin Gly Gly Gly Tyr Asp Met 290 295 300 Arg Lys Leu Leu Asn Gly Thr Val Val Ser lys His Pro Leu Lys Ser 305 310 315 320 Val Thr Fhe Val Asp Asn His Asp Thr Gin Pro Gly Gin Ser Leu Glu 325 330 335 Ser Thr Val Gin Thr Trp Fhe lys Pro Leu Ala Tyr Ala Fhe He Leu 340 345 350 Thr Arg Glu Ser Gly Tyr Pro Gin Val Fhe Tyr Gly Asp Met Tyr Gly 355 360 365 Thr Lys Gly Asp Ser Gin Arg Glu He Pro Ala Leu Lys His Lys He 370 375 380 Glu Pro He Leu lys Ala Arg lys Gin Tyr Ala Tyr Gly Ala Gin His 385 390 395 400 Asp Tyr Fhe Asp His His Asp He Val Gly Trp Thr Arg Glu Gly Asp 405 410 415 Ser Ser Val Ala Asn Ser Gly Leu Ala Ala Leu He Thr Asp Gly Pro 420 425 430 Gly Gly Ala lys Arg Met Tyr Val Gly Arg Gin Asn Ala Gly Glu Thr 435 440 445 Trp His Asp He Thr Gly Asn Arg Ser Glu Pro Val Val He Asn Ser 450 455 460 Glu Gly Trp Gly Glu Fhe His Val Asn Gly Gly Ser Val Ser He Tyr 465 470 475 480 Val Gin Arg Pro Lys Pro Ser Thr Pro Pro Gly Ser Ser Arg Met Lys 485 490 495 Gin Leu Glu Asp lys Val Glu Glu Leu Leu Ser Lys Asn Tyr His Leu 500 505 510 Glu Asn Glu Val Ala Arg Leu Lys Lys Leu Val Gly Glu Arg Gly Gly 515 520 525 Cys Gly Gly 530 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 3: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) L_ENGTH: 69 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) SI-RAMDEENESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) M3UDCULE TYPE: synthetic CNA (iv) ANTL-SENSE: YES (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 3: CAGCCOOCAC AGOOOOCAOG TTCAOCAACA AGOTTTTCA GAOGAGCAAC TT CTT TOC 60 AGCTGGΠAG 69 (2) INFORMATION PCR SEQ ID NO: 4: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) IΣNGTH: 54 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEENESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) M3U3CULE TYPE: synthetic CNA (iv) ANTI-SENSE: YES (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 4: TITTTUGACA GCAL?1T TTC AAL l'miLT TCCAGCIGTT TCATrOGOGA QGAC 54 (2) INPCFMATTON FOR SEQ ID NO: 5: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) I_ENGTH: 66 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) SIRANDEENESS: single (D) TOPQDXY: linpar (ii) _-_~l_~X~~_E TYPE: synthetic CNA (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 5: OOGQCTCCTC GOGAATGAAA CAGCTOGAAG ACAAAGTIGA AGAACIQCTC TOCAAAAACT 60 ACCACC 66 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 6: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) UENGTH: 65 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEENESS: single (D) TOCOLOGY: linear (ii) M3L_ECULE TYPE: synthetic CNA (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPπCN: SEQ ID NO: 6: TGGAAAAOGA AUΪHJ LXSJΪ CTGAAAAAOC lUlTOtJllA AOGTGGGGGC TCTOUUQQCT 60 GAGCT 65 (2) INFORMAnCN FOR SEQ ID NO: 7: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 90 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) sπtArøEENESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MXECULE TYPE: synthetic CNA (iv) ANTI-SENSE: YES (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPπCN: SEQ ID NO: 7: CAAIGCTGAT GAOGAOCITC GATCCCCOCA CAGOOOOCAC GTICACCΛAC AAGCITTTTC 60 AGAOGAGCAA CTTCGΓTTIC CAGCTGGTAG 90 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 8: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) UNGTH: 86 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEENESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) M3L£CULE TYPE: synthetic CNA (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 8: TCGAAAAOGA AGTTCCTOGT CTCAAAAAGC TTGTIGGTCA AOGTCGGGGC TCIGGGGGCA 60 TOGAAGCTOG TCATCAOCAT TCAGCT 86 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 9 (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 65 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEENESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: l inear (ii) VDL-ECULE TYPE: primer (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 9: CAGTCAC&SA T0CT0GOGAA TT GCCCAGC OQGCCATCGC OGCAAATCTT AATCGGAOGC 60 TGA G 65 « (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 10: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) I_ENGTH: 63 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) SIRANDEENESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MDI_ECUI£ TYPE: primer (xi) SEQUENCE DESCREFΠCN: SEQ ID NO: 10: CA3T0GOGAG GAOOOGGGOG GGGTOGAOGG TT CGGTCTT TGAACATAAA TTGAAAOOGA 60 CCC 63

Claims: PATENT CLAIMS 1. A process for producing a polypeptide with reduced allergenicity, by a) fermenting a microorganism capable of producing said polypeptide, and b) recovering said polypeptide in substantially pure form, wherein said microorganism ls modified in a manner whereby the expressed polypeptide molecules self-oligomerize. 2. The process according to claim 1, wherein said microorgan¬ ism is aodified by the introduction of one or more DNA con¬ structs comprising at least one DNA sequence coding for at least one polypeptide and at least one Zipper domain operably linked to each other. 3. The process according to claim 2, wherein the Zipper domain is an α-helical bundle comprises from two, three, four, five, six or seven helices 4. The process according to claims 1 and 2, wherein the said Zipper domain is a Polar Zipper of poly(L-glutamine) repeats. 5. The process according to any of the claims 2 to 3, wherein the Zipper domain comprises an amphiphilic helical bundle. 6. The process according to any of claims 2, 3 and 5, wherein the Zipper domain is a Leucine Zipper or a modification thereof. 7. The process according to claim 6, wherein the Zipper domain results in the formation of a hetero-dimer. 8. The process according to claim 7, wherein one Leucine Zipper is a Fos Leucine Zipper and the other is a Jun Leucine Zipper. 9. The process according to any of the claims 6 to 8, wherein a cysteine is included in the Leucine Zipper. 10. The process according to any of claims 2, 3 and 5, wherein the Zipper domain is an antiparallel four-helical bundle or a 5 modification thereof. 11. The process according to any of claims 1 to 10, wherein said DNA construct comprises an operably inserted linker se¬ quence between the DNA sequence coding for said polypeptide and 10 the DNA sequence coding for said Zipper domain. 12. The process according to any of the claims 1 to 11, wherein the DNA sequence encodes an enzyme. 1513. The process according to claim 12, wherein the DNA sequence encodes at least one enzyme selected from the group comprising proteases (metallo, acid, neutral or alkaline) , lipases, cellu- lases, amylases, lyases, xylanases, pectinases, pullulanase, polygalacturonases, oxidases, laccases, oxidoreductases, trans- 20 gluta inases , α-galactosidases, phytases and peroxidases 14. The process according to any of claims 1 to 13, wherein the DNA sequence encodes polypeptides having a molecular weight of about 5 kDa to 150 kDa, preferably from 20 kDa to 100 kDa, 25 especially from 20 kDa to 80 kDa. 15. The process according to any of claims 1 to 14, wherein the enzyme is Termamyl®. 3016. The process according to any of claims 1 to 15, wherein the oligomerization is a dimerization. 17. The process according to any of claims 1 to 15, wherein the oligomerization is a trimerization. 35 18. The process according to any of claims 1 to 15, wherein the oligomerization is an tetramerization. 19. The process according to claim 1 to 18, wherein the micro¬ organism is a bacterium, a yeast or a filamentous fungus. 20. The process according to claim 19, wherein said bacterium is selected from the group comprising grampositive bacteria such as strains of Bacillus, such as strains of B . subtilis , B . licheniformis , B . lentus , B . brevis , B . stearothermophilus , B . alkalophilus , B . amyloliquefaciens , B . coagulans , B . circulans , B . lautus , B . megaterium or B . thuringiensis , or strains of Streptomyces , such as S. lividans, S . murinus or S. griseus , or gramnegative bacteria such as Escherichia coli . 21. The process according to claim 20, wherein the host cell is B . licheniformis or E. coli . 22. The process according to claim 19, wherein said yeast is selected from the group comprising Saccharomyces spp. or Schi- zosaccharomyces spp. , in particular strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Saccharomyces kluyveri , or cells are strains of Kluyveromyces , such as K. lactis , Hansenula, such as H. polymorpha , or Pichia , in particular P. pastoris . 23. The process according to claim 19, wherein said filamentous fungus is selected from the group comprising Aspergillus spp. , Neurospora spp., Fusarium spp. or Trichoderma spp., in particu¬ lar strains of A. oryzae , A. nidulans or A. niger or F. oxysporu . 24. A DNA construct for producing polypeptides with reduced allergenicity comprising a DNA sequence encoding at least one polypeptide and at least one Zipper domain operably linked to each other. 25. The DNA construct according to claim 24, comprising a linker sequence inserted operably between DNA coding for the parent polypeptide and DNA coding for said Zipper domain. 26. The DNA construct according to claims 24 and 25, comprising a DNA sequence which when expressed exhibits at least one enzymatic activity. 27. The DNA construct according to claim 26, capable of 5 expressing an enzyme selected from the group comprising proteases (metallo, acid, neutral or alkaline) , lipases, cellulaseε, amylases, lyases, xylanases, pectinases, polygalac- turonases, oxidases, laccases, oxidoreductases, transglutamina- ses, α-galactosidases, phytases or peroxidases. 10 28. The DNA construct according to any of claims 24 to 27, wherein the DNA sequence encodes polypeptides with a molecular weight of about 5 kDa to 150 kDa, preferably from 20 kDa to 100 kDa, especially from 20 kDa to 80 kDa. 15 29. The DNA construct according to any of claims 24 to 28, wherein the enzyme is Termamyl*. 30. The DNA construct according to any of claim 24 to 29, com- 20 prising the DNA sequence shown in SEQ ID NO 1. 31. A recombinant vector or transformation vehicle, comprising a DNA construct according to any of claims 24 to 30. 2532. The vector according to claim 31, wherein said DNA con¬ struct is operably linked to a secretion signal. 33. The vector according to claims 31 and 32, wherein said DNA construct comprise a sequence encoding an affinity tag. 30 34. The vector according to any of claims 31 to 33, wherein said vector is the pAZ-1 plasmid. 35. A cell comprising a DNA construct according to any of 35 claims 24 to 30 or a recombinant vector or expression vector according to any of claims 31 to 34. 36. The cell according to claim 35, wherein the cell is a bacterium, a yeast or a filamentous fungus. 37. The cell according to claim 36, wherein said bacterium is selected from the group comprising grampositive bacteria such 5 as strains of Bacillus , such as strains of B. suJtiiis, B . licheniformis , B . lentus , B . brevis , B . stearothermophilus , B . alkalophilus , B . amyloliquefaciens , B . coagulans , B . circulans , B . lautus , B . megaterium or B . thuringiensis , or strains of Streptomyces , such as S. lividans, S. murinus or S. griseus , 10 or gramnegative bacteria such as Escherichia coli . 38. The cell according to claim 37, wherein the cell is B. licheniformis or E. coli . 1539. The cell according to claim 36, wherein said yeast cell is selected from the group comprising Saccharomyces spp. or Schizosaccharomyces spp. , in particular strains of Saccharomy¬ ces cerevisiae or Saccharomyces kluyveri , or cells are strains of Kluyveromyces , such as K. lactis , Hansenula , such as H . 20 polymorpha , or Pichia , in particular P. pastoris . 40. The cell according to claim 36, wherein the filamentous fungus is selected from the group comprising Aspergillus spp., Neurospora spp., Fusarium spp. or Trichoderma spp., in particu- 25 lar strains of A. oryzae, A. nidulans or A . niger or F . oxysporum . 41. A microbially produced polypeptide with reduced aller¬ genicity produced according to any of claims 1 to 23. 30 42. The polypeptide according to claim 41, comprising from 2 to 10 polypeptide molecules. 43. The polypeptide according to claim 42 is a dimer. 35 44. The polypeptide according to claim 42 is a trimer. 45. The polypeptide according to claim 42 is a tetramer. 46. The polypeptide according to any of claims 41 to 45, ex¬ hibiting enzymatic activity. 47. The polypeptide according to claim 46, exhibiting at least 5 one enzyme activity exhibited by enzymes selected from the group comprising proteases (metallo, acid, neutral or alkali¬ ne) , lipases, cellulases, amylases, lyases, xylanases, pecti- nases, pullulanase, polygalacturonases, oxidases, laccases, oxidoreductases, transglutaminases, α-galactosidases, phytases 10 and peroxidases 48. The polypeptide according to any of claims 41 to 47, where¬ in the monomeric polypeptide molecule has a molecular weight of about 5 kDa to 150 kDa, preferably from 20 kDa to 100 kDa, 15 especially from 20 kDa to 80 kDa. 49. The polypeptide according to any of claims 41 to 48, where¬ in the enzyme exhibits α-amylase activity. 2050. An oligomeric polypeptide with reduced allergenicity com¬ prising at least one polypeptide bonded or linked to at least one Zipper domain which is coupled to at least one polypeptide bonded or linked to at least one Zipper domain. 2551. The oligomeric polypeptide according to claim 50, wherein the Zipper domain comprises an α-helical bundle. 52. The oligomeric polypeptide according to claim 51, wherein the said α-helical bundle comprises two, three, four, five, six 30 or seven helices. 53. The oligomeric polypeptide according to any of the claims 50 to 52, wherein the Zipper domain comprises an amphiphilic helical bundle. 35 54. The oligomeric polypeptide according to claim 50, wherein the Zipper domain is a Polar Zipper of poly(L-glutamine) re¬ peats or modifications thereof. 55. The oligomeric polypeptide according to any of claims 50 to 53, wherein the Zipper domain is a Leucine Zipper or a modifi¬ cation thereof. 5 56. The oligomeric polypeptide according to claims 54 and 55, wherein the Zipper domain oligomerization results in the formation of a hetero-dimer. 1057. The oligomeric polypeptide according to claim 56, wherein one Leucine Zipper is a Fos Leucine Zipper and the other is a Jun Leucine Zipper. 58. The oligomeric polypeptide according to any of the claims 1555 to 57, wherein a cysteine is included in the Leucine Zipper. 59. The oligomeric polypeptide according to any of claims 50 to 58, wherein the Zipper domain is an antiparallel four-helical bundle or a modification thereof. 20 60. The oligomeric polypeptide according to any of claims 50 to 59 , wherein said DNA construct comprises an operably inserted linker sequence between the DNA sequence coding for said poly¬ peptide and the DNA sequence coding for said Zipper domain. 25 61. The oligomeric polypeptide according to any of claims 50 to 60 wherein said polypeptide exhibits enzymatic activity. 62. The oligomeric polypeptide according to claims 61, wherein 30 the polypeptide exhibits at least one enzyme activity exhibited by enzymes selected from the group comprising proteases (metal- lo, acidic, neutral or alkaline) , lipases, cellulases, amylas- es, lyases, xylanases, pectinases, pullulanase, polygalacturo- nases, oxidases, laccases, oxidoreductases, transglutaminases, 35 α-galactosidases, phytases and peroxidases 63. The oligomeric polypeptide according to any of claims 61 to 62, wherein the monomeric polypeptide molecule has a molecular weight of about 5 kDa to 150 kDa, preferably from 20 kDa to 100 kDa, especially from 20 kDa to 80 kDa. 64. The oligomeric polypeptide according to any of claims 61 to 563, wherein the enzyme exhibits α-amylase activity. 65. The oligomeric polypeptide according to any of claims 50 to 59, wherein said Zipper domain is linked to said polypeptide and the C-terminal of the polypeptide. 10 66. The oligomeric polypeptide according to any of claims 50 to 59, wherein said Zipper domain is linked to said polypeptide and the N-terminal of the polypeptide. 1567. A composition comprising at least one polypeptide according to any of the claims 41 to 49 and/or at least one oligomeric polypeptides according to any of claims 50 to 66. 68. The composition according to claim 67, comprising ingredi- 20 ents normally used in detergents, household articles, agroche- micals, personal care products, cosmetics, toiletry, pharmaceu¬ ticals, composition use for treating textiles, food and/or feed. 2569. Use of Zipper domains for reducing allergenicity of poly¬ peptides. 70. The use according to claim 69, wherein said Zipper domains are used for oligomerizing polypeptide molecules. 30 71. The use according to claims 69 and 70, for a process accor¬ ding to any of claims 1 to 23 or in oligomeric polypeptides ac¬ cording to any of claims 50 to 66. 3572. The use according to any of claims 69 to 71, wherein the Zipper domain comprises two, three, four, five, six or seven α- helical bundles. 73. The use according to any of claims 69 to 71, wherein the said Zipper domain is a Polar Zipper of poly(L-glutamine) re¬ peats or a modification thereof. 574. The use according to any of the claims 71 and 72, wherein said Zipper domain comprises an amphipathic helical bundle. 75. The use according to any of claims 71, 72 and 74, wherein said Zipper domain is a Leucine Zipper or a modification there- 10 of. 76. The use according to claim 75, wherein the Leucine Zipper is a Fos-Jun Leucine Zipper. 1577. The use according to any of the claims 75 and 76, wherein a cysteine is included in the Leucine Zipper. 78. The use according to any of claims 71, 72 and 74, wherein said Zipper domain is an antiparallel four-helical bundle or a 20 modification thereof. 79. The use according to any of claims 69 to 78, in household articles. 2580. The use according to any of claims 69 to 78, in detergents, including dishwashing detergents and soap bars. 81. The use according to any of claims 69 to 78, in personal care products. 30 82. The use according to claim 81, in oral care products inclu¬ ding cleaning products for dentures and dentifrices. 83. The use according to claim 81, in skin care products inclu- 35 ding creams and lotions. 84. The use according to claim 81, in hair care or hair treat¬ ment products, including shampoos. 85. The use according to claim 81, in contact lens cleaning products. 86. The use according to any of claims 69 to 78, in cosmetics. 87. The use according to any of claims 69 to 78, in pharmaceu¬ ticals. 88. The use according to any of claims 69 to 78, in agrochemi- cals. 89. The use according to any of claims 69 to 78, in food and feed.

Inventors: BJOERNVAD MADS ESKELUND, PRENTOE ANNETTE, BJOERNVAD, MADS, ESKELUND, PRENTOE, ANNETTE
Applicants: BJOERNVAD MADS ESKELUND, NOVONORDISK AS, PRENTOE ANNETTE, BJOERNVAD, MADS, ESKELUND, NOVO NORDISK A/S, PRENTOE, ANNETTE
Application year: 1995
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: A01N37, A23L1, A61K8, A61Q5, A61Q11, A61Q13, A61Q19, C11D3, C12N1, C12N9, C12N15, D06M15, G02C13