IMPROVED FORMATION IN A TWO FABRIC PAPER MACHINE

Abstract: A forming section for a two-fabric paper machine using formation blades having shallow cavities in their top surfaces which withdraw fluid from the stock and propel it back through the fabric so as to break up the flocculated mat without causing excessive drainage and loss of fines. The parameters required to design the blade cavity, the top surface of the blade, and the angles of wrap of the fabrics about the blades so as to obtain best results are provided.

Description: Improved Formation in a Two Fabric Paper Machine Background of the Invention (a) Field of the Invention The present invention relates generally to a forming section for use in a two fabric paper making machine. The invention is specifically directed at improving the formation of the paper made on the machine. (b) Description of the Prior Art The need to agitate the fluid stock while it is being formed into a self-supporting web in single- and two-fabric paper machines is well known. On single-fabric Fourdrinier type machines, the agitating means are principally: 1) the horizontal shake mechanism, which is used on machines whose speeds are less than about 400 m/min, and 2) agitation caused by vertical movement of the fabric as it passes over table rolls, foils or suction boxes having uneven top surfaces. These latter devices replace the shake mechanism at high speeds, thereby providing the critical agitation necessary for good paper formation. The forming zones of two-fabric paper making machines are of two general types: hybrid formers and gap formers . In hybrid formers, the stock is partially formed on a first fabric initially, as in a single-fabric Fourdrinier machine, and then subjected to drainage pressure between two fabrics at a later stage of the forming zone. In a gap former, the fluid stock is directed immediately into the gap between two forming fabrics. There are two generic types of gap formers: roll-gap formers, wherein drainage pressure is created by fabric convergence over a rotating roll, and blade-gap formers, wherein drainage pressure is created by the passage of the fabrics over stationary blades at some angle of wrap so as to induce pressure pulses between the fabrics . Both hybrid and gap formers can benefit from the present invention. The need for agitation in two-fabric paper machines is well known. Roll-gap formers offer generally poorer formation than blade-gap formers, but provide better retention of fine particles because the squeezing action of the fabric wrapping about the roll does .not agitate the stock. Blade-gap formers, on the other hand, are known to provide good sheet formation, but generally poorer retention of fine particles than roll-gap formers because of the pressure pulses induced in the stock by the stationary blades as the fabrics move over them while proceeding through the forming section. The magnitude and frequency of these pressure pulses are limited by the geometry of the forming section, with a large forming shoe, for example, providing either several large angles of wrap, or relatively more small wrap angles. These same pressure pulses induce shearing effects in the stock which breaks up floes, thereby improving formation. A mathematical model of the pressure distributions occurring between forming fabrics passing over stationary blades in blade gap formers has recently been proposed by Zhao and Kerekes (80th Annual Meeting, CPPA Technical Section, February 1-2 1994, Montreal, Quebec, Preprints Sect. A, pp. A31-A38) , and the magnitude of the pressure pulses were earlier measured by Brauns (72nd Annual Meeting, CPPA Technical Section, January 28-29 1986, Preprints Sect. A., Montreal, Quebec, pp. A275-A282) . Pressure pulses are induced in the stock as the fabrics wrap about these blades while proceeding through the forming section. The blades discussed in these references are described as scraper blades with a flat, fabric contacting surface. Attempts to improve on the agitation described by this simple type of blading action have been made by Saad (US 4,420,370), Ebihara (US 4,999,087) and Bando (US 5,248,392), among others. The pulp agitation devices disclosed by Saad provide a fabric contacting surface, formed from multiple protruding cross-machine direction inserts, between which are located channels having closed flat bottoms and steeply sloping side walls. These channels allegedly induce pressure pulses, hence agitation, in the stock by causing liquid to be withdrawn at their upstream side by a foiling action, and then forcing it back through the fabric into the stock by the upwardly sloping channel wall at their downstream side. However, the steeply sloping upstream walls of these agitator channels, which decline in the downstream direction at an angle of about 63° to the fabric contacting surface (col. 5, lines 51-54, and Figures 2 - 6) , prevent a spontaneous foiling action from developing which would otherwise withdraw water from the stock down into the channel, and they are therefore ineffective. Practical limitations to the angular declination of the upstream divergent surface walls of agitator channels are well known, and have been disclosed by Wrist (US 2,928,465) and Johnson (US 3,874,998). These references teach that, for agitator blades to be effective in developing a useful foiling action which will withdraw liquid in a continuum from the stock suspension above, the angle of declination of the upstream divergent surface wall of an agitation channel should be no more than about 5° (Wrist, col. 3, lines 19-24) to about 8° (Johnson, col. 3, lines 43-45; col. 6, lines 19-23) from the fabric contacting surface. In US 4,999,087, Ebihara describes a two-fabric forming section in which dewatering devices are arranged on opposite sides of the two fabrics so as to press inwardly towards the stock, thereby causing the fabrics to follow a zig-zag path through the forming zone. Cavities are provided to receive the fluid expressed from between the fabrics by the pressing action of the device on the opposing side of the fabric pair. This fluid is forced back into the stock sandwiched between the fabrics by a wedge-shaped surface whose distance from the contacting fabric decreases in the downstream direction. The force exerted by the pressing action of the device on the opposing fabric side is relied upon to force water into this cavity from the stock sandwiched between the two fabrics. The upstream wall of each cavity is at right angles to the fabric contacting surfaces and consequently a foiling action can never be developed at this point which will spontaneously withdraw fluid into the cavities.. In US 5,248,392, Bando discloses a forming apparatus for use in a two-fabric forming section. The apparatus consists of two devices, located alternately on opposite sides of the fabrics, whose fabric contacting surfaces are comprised of several shoe blades each separated from the other by a space or cavity to which vacuum is applied for drainage. The lands of the shoe blades have a flat front leading portion coinciding with the line of travel of one of the two fabrics, a mid portion comprising a wedge-shaped trough whose depth in relation to the fabrics decreases in the downstream direction, and a back portion which may be flat or may slope away from the fabrics in the downstream direction. The shoe blades are positioned such that the fabrics proceed onto the front leading portion without being bent. Fabric bending over the back portion of each blade generates a pressure pulse which begins over the wedge-shaped trough and extends in the downstream direction. Each trough begins abruptly at 90°, as in Ebihara, and then inclines angularly upwards until it meets the downstream fabric contacting surface portion of the blade. It is clear from the prior art teachings of Wrist and Johnson that the abrupt 90° depression angle of the divergent upstream walls of the troughs as taught by Bando would not spontaneously foil water from the stock sandwiched between the fabrics. Water removal is thus dependent on the two fabrics being bent as they pass over the downstream portion of each shoe blade. This bending generates a pressure pulse in the stock which may cause water to enter the trough and then be expressed back into the space between the fabrics. However, this is uncertain, and possibly no water is expressed into the trough by this pulse. The prior art is replete with descriptions of stationary blade devices which are said to develop agitation in the stock on either or both single- or two-fabric paper machines. For example, in US 3,573,159 Sepall discloses a stock agitation device in which liquid, drained from the stock by foiling action, is forced back into the fabric by means of drainage channels in the surface of the device so as to produce a succession of pressure pulses in the stock suspension. The disadvantage of the Sepall apparatus is that it is a massive permanent part of the machine, requiring considerable supporting structure. Sepall also does not teach any of the critical parameters required for application of the apparatus in two-fabric forming sections. In US 3,874,998, Johnson discloses an improvement to the Sepall device whereby multiple, replaceable blades are utilized to agitate the stock on a single fabric machine. The blade surface comprises upstream and downstream fabric contacting surfaces with an intervening agitation channel therebetween. The upstream wall of the channel slopes downwardly from the upstream land at an angle of from 1° to 8°, while the downstream wall of the channel diverges upstream from the downstream land at an angle of from 1° to 70°. The channel may be straight-sided, curved or flat bottomed, but the inclining and declining angles of the channel walls must lie between the aforementioned limits. These limits were experimentally determined and found to be similar to the optimum divergent angle for drainage foils disclosed by Wrist. Wrist discovered that an effective foiling action would develop over the fabric contacting surface of a drainage foil if the downstream portion of that surface declined away from the fabric at an angle of from about 1° to about 5°. The divergent surfaces of foil blades which are presently used on the majority of single fabric machines utilize this angular range. As used on a single fabric forming section, the foiling action developed by the Johnson blade at the upstream declining surface of the blade channel withdraws fluid in a continuum from the stock. This liquid is then forced back into the underside of the fabric by the downstream inclining surface of the channel. The upward force of this liquid causes a disruption in the upper surface of the stock, which may benefit formation if small, but which may worsen formation if excessive. It has been found in practice that, under certain conditions, the fluid forced upwardly by the downstream divergent wall will lift the fabric from the rear land portion of the blade, thereby allowing white water to escape from the cavity between the fabric and blade surface along with its fine particles, thus reducing retention. Under such conditions, the blade is also causing drainage to occur, which is contrary to its purpose of agitating without draining the stock. It would be desirable if paper formation could be more effectively controlled without the attendant detrimental effects of the prior art, particularly reduced retention. Thus, the problem which this invention is intended to solve is: to provide a means whereby a locally generated pressure pulse may be produced that is relatively independent of the geometric constraints of the fabric paths through the forming section, and which does not increase local drainage and reduce retention. Summary of the Invention The present invention provides a means of overcoming the aforementioned disadvantages of the prior art by providing a forming section for use in a two-fabric paper making machine, comprising in combination: (i) a first and a second endless moving forming fabric loop, both loops having a linear machine direction tension through the forming section and moving in a joint run from an upstream to a downstream direction, and between which fabrics a layer of stock of known thickness is conveyed; (ii) at least one formation blade extending transversely to the direction of fabric travel and in contact with the first fabric such that under the machine direction tension both fabrics with stock therebetween wrap about the at least one blade; (iii) the at least one formation blade has a top face, a bottom, and upstream and downstream fabric contacting edges; (iv) the top face of the at least one blade having two substantially coplanar upstream and downstream surfaces in contact with the first fabric with a cavity intervening therebetween; (v) the cavity having upstream and downstream divergent walls with an intermediate intervening surface therebetween, the upstream cavity wall diverging from the upstream fabric contact surface at an angle of from 1° to 8°, the downstream cavity wall diverging from the downstream fabric contact surface at an angle of from 1° to 8° so as to define a cavity whose depth from the plane of the substantially coplanar contact surfaces to the intermediate intervening surface is from about 1/10th to about 3/4 the thickness of the stock which is conveyed between the first and second fabrics over the cavity; (vi) the first fabric wrapping about the edges of the at least one blade so as to have a total angle of wrap that is equal to or greater than 0.5° while in contact with both the upstream and downstream contact surfaces; (vii) the second fabric also wrapping the edges of the at least one blade so as to have a total angle of wrap that is equal to or greater than 0.5°, and (viii) both first and second fabrics wrap about the downstream edge of the downstream contact surface of the at least one blade with an angle of wrap that is equal to or greater than 0.5°. We have discovered that it is particularly advantageous if, in the forming section of this invention, the bottoms of the blades are each provided with a T-shaped recess to allow for their ready mounting onto cooperating T-shaped mounting rails, such as has been disclosed by White et al. in US 3,337,394. Rocking of the blades on the mounting rail during normal machine operation may thus be restricted to no more than + 0.25° by this means, and each blade may be replaced quickly and easily as papermaking conditions require. The forming section of the present invention is structured and arranged such that the at least one demountable formation blade is positioned so as to be in contact with a first one of the two fabrics such that the first fabric passes over and in contact with both the upstream and downstream fabric contact surfaces of the blade. Fabric tensions, and the angles formed by the fabrics as they wrap about the upstream and downstream edges of the at least one blade, cause fluid pressure pulses to develop which serve to agitate the stock held between the fabrics and thereby improve formation. The beneficial effects of these fluid pressure pulses can be optimized if the downstream contact surface of the at least one blade is sufficiently wide so as to oppose at least 75% of the force of the pressure pulse generated by the angle of wrap of the fabrics at the downstream edge of the blade. The surface geometry of the blade is such that a foiling action develops over the blade cavity which will withdraw fluid from the stock; this fluid is then forcibly returned to the stock by its velocity over the upwardly sloping downstream wall of the cavity. This induces a turbulence in the fluid stock which will further improve formation. The fabric tensions, and their angles of wrap over the downstream portion of the blade, cooperate with the aforementioned foiling action to prevent stock leakage through the first fabric at this point. Blade surface geometry, blade position, and fabric tensions, thus now cooperate in a novel fashion in the forming section of this invention so as to improve web formation in a manner which does not detrimentally affect the retention of fine particles in the stock, and whose effectiveness is not limited by the structure and geometry of the paper machine forming section. In a first preferred embodiment, the forming section of the present invention is comprised of a plurality of stationary fabric contacting surfaces, at least one of which is a formation blade, and is structured and arranged such that only the first fabric travels in contact with all of the fabric contacting surfaces, and the path described by the two fabrics as they proceed over the fabric contacting surfaces is that of a segmented curve. In a second preferred embodiment, the forming section of the present invention is comprised of a plurality of stationary fabric contacting surfaces at least one of which is a formation blade, and is structured and arranged such that the stationary fabric contact surfaces including the at least one formation blade are located in alternating positions on opposing sides of the two fabrics so that each of the first and second fabrics alternately contacts the stationary fabric contact surfaces as they travel along a substantially zig-zag course through the forming section. Brief Description of the Drawings The invention will now be described with reference to the drawings in which: Fig. 1 is a side elevation of a portion of a single fabric, open surface paper machine forming section running under normal operating conditions and equipped with a prior art agitator blade; Fig. 2 is a graphical depiction of the fluid pressures in the channel of the prior art agitator blade shown in Fig. 1; Fig. 3 is a graphical depiction of the mechanical pressure exerted by the forming fabric on the surfaces of the prior art agitator blade of Fig. 1; Fig. 4 is a side elevation of a portion of the forming section of a two-fabric paper machine according to the present invention, which is running under normal operating conditions and is equipped with a single formation blade; Fig. 5 is a graphical depiction of the fluid pressures occurring between the first and second fabrics as they pass over the formation blade of Fig. 4; Fig. 6 is a graphical depiction of the fluid pressures occurring in the cavity of the formation blade of Fig. 4 as the first and second fabrics pass thereover; Fig. 7 is a graphical depiction of the mechanical forces exerted by the first and second fabrics on the substantially coplanar surfaces of the formation blade of Fig. 4; Fig. 8 is a side elevation of a portion of the forming section of a two-fabric paper machine that is at rest and is equipped with a single formation blade as shown in Fig. 4; this Figure is similar to Figure 4 and is provided so as to more clearly show the angles of wrap of the fabrics as they pass over a formation blade; Fig. 9 is an illustration of one embodiment of the present invention in which a plurality of formation blades such as are shown in Fig. 4 are all positioned in a curve on one side of the forming fabrics; and Fig. 10 is an illustration of a second embodiment of the present invention in which a plurality of formation blades such as are shown in Fig. 4 are located in alternating positions on opposing sides of the forming section. All pressures described in the text accompanying these Figures are relative to ambient atmospheric pressure as measured at or near the surface of the blade or stock. As shown in the Figures, all angles have been exaggerated for clarity. In all of the Figures the forming fabric, or fabrics, move from left to right. Detailed Description of the Drawings In Figure 1 there is shown an agitator blade in accordance with the prior art of Johnson, US 3,874,998, and as is shown in that patent. The blade is illustrated as if in normal operation on a single fabric open surface paper machine. The blade 101 has top, bottom and upstream and downstream sides providing a leading edge 102, a trailing edge 103, an upstream flat contact surface 104 having a width A, a downstream flat contact surface 105 having a width B which is coplanar with the surface 104, and a channel 106. The channel 106 intervenes the contact surfaces 104 and 105 and comprises three discrete flat surfaces, forming an upstream wall 107, a floor or bottom wall 108, and a downstream wall 109. The wall 107 diverges downstream from 104 at an angle a which is from 1° to 8°. Wall 109 diverges upstream from 105 at an angle b which may be from 1° to 70°. As shown in this Figure, the stock activity has been exaggerated for clarity. Due to the negative fluid pressure developed at the upstream wall 107, as is shown at 120 in Fig. 2, the stock 110 is subjected to a foiling action which withdraws fluid through the bottom of the fabric 113. As this fluid proceeds across the channel to the bottom wall 108, the negative fluid pressure decreases to zero as at 121 and then begins to increase positively as at 122 as the stock approaches the downstream wall 109 of the channel. The stock is thus positively forced back at this point through the fabric 113 into the stock layer 110 above. The free surface of the stock is disturbed by two actions as the fabric proceeds over the Johnson agitator blade. First, a small deflection of the fabric 113 into the channel 106 caused by the negative fluid pressure developed at the wall 107 accelerates the stock, causing kick-up 111. Secondly, the uprushing fluid from the channel 106 over the surface 109 may contribute to the surface disturbance as at 119. A problem associated with this blade design when used in an open surface forming section is that, if the positive pressure developed by the uprushing fluid exceeds the weight of the stock 110 on the forming fabric 113 above the blade 101, as is shown by the curve 123 in Fig. 2, the fabric 113 can be lifted off the surface 105, and liquid, fines and fibers as at 114 may be discharged between the fabric and the blade at the trailing edge 103, thereby draining these components from the stock. Neither drainage, fines loss, nor excessive free surface instability are desirable in most instances. If this positive pressure does not exceed the weight of the stock, as shown by the curve 124 in Fig. 2, then drainage at the trailing edge 103 of the blade will not occur. Fig. 3 depicts the mechanical pressure applied by the fabric 113 and stock 110 to the fabric contact surfaces 104 and 105 of the blade 101 in reaction to the negative fluid pressure developed at the upstream wall 107 of the channel 106. As the fabric passes over the surface 104, this mechanical pressure rapidly increases to a maximum at the downstream edge of the surface 104, adjacent the zone of negative fluid pressure at the wall 107, and then drops to zero as the fabric passes over the channel 106. This is shown by the curve 130 in Fig. 3. The mechanical pressure exerted by the fabric on the blade at the downstream fabric contact surface 105 is either very small or zero, as shown by the curve 131, and its magnitude is dependent on both the weight of the stock thereabove and the magnitude of the positive pressure generated by the uprushing stock at the downstream wall 109. If the fabric and the inherent weight of the stock do not exert any mechanical pressure on the downstream surface 105, then leakage of stock over this surface as at 114 will occur. At high machine speeds and low stock weights, it is certain that fluid stock will leak from the trailing edge 103 of the blade 101. At lower machine speeds and heavier stock weights, the blade edge 103 may be sealed by the weight of the stock, in which case the fluid pressure will remain positive to the downstream end of the channel and the mechanical pressure over the surface 105 is finite. The effectiveness of this blade in an open surface forming section is thus limited by these conditions. In Figure 4 there is shown a portion of a forming section of a two-fabric paper machine in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. As shown in this diagram, the paper machine is in normal operation with the two fabrics moving over a formation blade 201, the first fabric 213 contacting the blade surface and the second fabric 214 travelling at the same speed as the first and confining therebetween a layer of stock having thickness S. The path taken by the two forming fabrics as they proceed over the formation blades and through the forming section of this invention may either be a zig-zag or a segmented curve. The angle of wrap of the first fabric 213 about the upstream edge 202 of the blade 201 is c; the angle of wrap of this same fabric at the downstream edge 203 of the blade is d. Thus, the total angle of wrap β of the first fabric 213 about the edges of blade 201 is equal to the sum of c and d. The angle of wrap of the second fabric 214 about the upstream edge 202 of the blade 201 is f; the angle of wrap of this same fabric at the downstream edge 203 of the blade is g. The total angle of wrap of the fabric 214 about the edges of blade 201 is h which is equal to the sum of f and g. The total angle of wrap of a fabric about the edges of a formation blade is thus defined as that angle which is subtended by the upstream and downstream angles of wrap of the fabric about the edges of the blade, and is given by the following: Total Angle of Wrap of First Fabric = e = c + d Total Angle of Wrap of Second Fabric = h = f + g The thickness S of the stock 210 as it is held between the fabrics 213 and 214 decreases due to drainage of liquid through the fabrics away from the blade 201 as the fabrics proceed from the upstream to the downstream edge of the blade 201. Internal and external forces also act on the fabrics, causing them to deviate from a strictly parallel course as they wrap about the blade. Thus, when the machine is in operation, the total angles of wrap e and h of the two fabrics will not necessarily be equal, nor will the pairs of upstream and downstream angles of wrap, c and f, d and g, be equal. It is only when the forming section is static and the fabrics are under tension that these pairs of angles will be equal to one another because it is then that the paths of the two fabrics about the blade are parallel. It will also be understood by those skilled in the art that, when the forming section is in operation, the angles of wrap c and f, and d and g of the fabrics 213 and 214 will be slightly different than if measured when the forming section is static. The blade 201 extends transversely to the direction of fabric travel and has top, bottom and upstream and downstream sides providing an upstream edge 202, a downstream edge 203, an upstream flat fabric contact surface 204, a downstream flat fabric contact surface 205, both surfaces 204 and 205 being substantially coplanar, and a cavity 206 which intervenes the contact surfaces 204 and 205 and whose depth below these surfaces is k. As shown in Figure 4, the cavity 206 is comprised of two discrete flat surfaces, forming an upstream wall 207 and a downstream wall 209 which meet at intermediate surface 208, forming the bottom of the cavity 206. Also as shown in this figure, the intermediate surface 208 forms the line of intersection of the walls 207 and 209. It is contemplated that, under certain paper making conditions, it may be advantageous to extend the surface 208 so that it has some finite machine direction width. If this is done (see blade 301 in Figure 9) , then the surface 208 may extend so as to either be parallel to the plane of the substantially coplanar upstream and downstream contact surfaces 204 and 205, or slightly inclined to this plane at an angle of from about 1° to about 8°. Alternatively, it is also contemplated that the surface of the blade cavity may have a somewhat elliptical shape, rather than being made up of several discrete surfaces 207, 208 and 209 as shown in Fig. 4. Depending upon paper making conditions, the curve has a tangent angle at the upstream side of the cavity that is from about 1° to 8° and a tangent angle at the downstream side of from about 1° to 8° (see blade 402 in Figure 10) . In both cases, the tangent is taken at the point where the curve meets the blade top surface. Those skilled in the art will readily realize that choices concerning the optimum size and shape of the blade cavity 206 will be dictated by papermaking conditions prevailing in the forming section at the time such selection is made. The wall 207 diverges downstream from surface 204 at an angle o which is from about 1° to 8°. Wall 209 diverges upstream from surface 205 at an angle p which is also from about 1° to 8°. As shown in this Figure, the angles o and p have been exaggerated for clarity. The stock 210, held between the fabrics 213 and 214 as they pass over the blade 201, has a thickness S which decreases from the upstream edge 202 to the downstream edge 203 due to drainage of liquid through the fabrics. The fabrics 213 and 214, which are shown moving over the surface of the formation blade 201 at a known velocity, have tensions N and M respectively, and wrap about the edges of blade 201 so as to have total angles of wrap e and h. As the fabrics 213 and 214 approach the upstream edge 202 of the blade 201 at angles of wrap c and f respectively, both of which are greater than zero, a positive fluid pressure pulse is induced in the stock 210 as it is held between the fabrics. The shape and magnitude of this upstream pulse is somewhat similar to that described as occurring at the downstream edge of the blade in the model proposed by Zhao and Kerekes. As shown at 220 in Fig. 5, this positively increasing fluid pressure pulse increases in magnitude to a maximum just prior the edge 202, and then decays rapidly to zero as the fabrics proceed onto the upstream fabric contact surface 204. The magnitude and shape of this fluid pressure pulse are functions of the tensions N and M in the fabrics 213 and 214, the angles of wrap c and f as the fabrics wrap over the upstream edge 202 of the blade, fabric velocity, pulp drainage resistance, fluid stock thickness, movement of the fluid stock between the fabrics at this point, and other variables, such as fabric stiffness. As they proceed downstream over the formation blade, fluid pressure in the stock sandwiched between the fabrics begins to increase over the downstream contact surface 205. This fluid pressure increases to a maximum at the downstream edge 203 of the blade 201, as shown by the curve 222, producing a pulse similar in shape and magnitude to that caused at the upstream contact surface 204, which is represented by the curve 220. The configuration of this second, downstream pulse is described by the model proposed by Zhao and Kerekes and is also governed by the fabric tensions, their angles of wrap, and the other variables discussed above. Hereafter, positive fluid pressure pulse phenomena which are induced in the stock and governed by the aforementioned parameters will be referred to simply as ZK pulses. Two beneficial effects to paper formation resulting from the ZK pulse are, firstly, liquid drainage through the fabrics away from the blade and, secondly, redistribution of the fibers in the stock held between the fabrics as they proceed over the upstream edge 202 of the blade. The stock 210 conveyed between the fabrics 213 and 214 is thus subjected to two distinct ZK pulses as it passes over the surface of the formation blade 201, the shape and magnitude of which are governed primarily by the fabric tensions and the angles of wrap of the fabrics about the upstream and downstream edges 202 and 203 of the blade. Both ZK pulses induce a shearing effect in the stock, which extends upstream from both the upstream and downstream fabric contact surfaces of the blade. As illustrated in Fig. 4, the cavity 206 of the blade 201 is positioned proximate to the upstream edge 202, and the upstream flat contact surface 204 is correspondingly short. The actual location of this cavity on the blade surface will influence the formation effects provided by the forming section of this invention. Thus, optimum blade surface geometry will be dictated by papermaking conditions and forming section geometry. For example, if the cavity is located near the upstream edge of the blade, as illustrated in Fig. 4, then the onset of negative pressure in the cavity due to a foiling action occurring there will be very close to the end of the ZK pressure pulse developed ahead of the upstream edge of the blade, as shown at 221 in Figure 5. If the cavity is located closer to the midpoint of the blade, then the stock is subjected to three separate fluid pressure phenomena in succession, the first being the ZK pulse caused by fabric tension and wrap at the upstream edge of the blade, the second being the turbulence created by the movement of fluid into and out of the cavity 206, as will be described below, and the third being the second ZK pulse caused at the downstream edge of the blade. As the fabrics proceed over the blade cavity 206 defined by the walls 207 and 209, and a surface 208 if present, a second phenomenon occurs which also has a beneficial effect on stock formation. As the first fabric 213 proceeds over the upstream contact surface 204, it reaches the upstream divergent wall 207 of the formation blade cavity 206. A negative fluid pressure develops as the first fabric passes over the upstream divergent wall 207 of the cavity 206 due to a foiling action, as described by Wrist in US 2,928,465. As shown in Fig. 6, the fluid pressure in the cavity 206 first decreases from zero to a minimum negative value as at 230 as the first fabric 213 passes over the upstream divergent wall 207. Fluid pressure then increases to zero at the intermediate point 208 of the cavity, and then further increases positively as at 231 over the upwardly sloping surface 209, thereafter remaining positive to the end of the cavity, as at 232. The initially negative fluid pressure in the cavity 206 serves to withdraw liquid from the stock layer 210 sandwiched between the fabrics 213 and 214 at the wall 207, as also described by Wrist. As the fluid pressure in this cavity increases to a positive value, as at 231, the liquid is then forced backwards through the first fabric 213 into the stock layer 210 above by the shallow angle p of the upwardly sloping wall 209 while the fabric is held onto the downstream contact surface 205 by the tensions N and M of the fabrics 213 and 214 as they wrap the downstream edge 203. Regardless of the location of the cavity on the blade surface, it is critical that the downstream surface 205 of the blade 201 have sufficient machine direction width such that the beneficial effects of the turbulence caused by the uprushing fluid from the downstream wall 209 of the cavity 206 are not inhibited by the ZK pulse created proximate the downstream edge 203. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the downstream contact surface 205 of the blade 201 will be sufficiently large so as to oppose at least 75% of the force of the ZK pulse developed at the downstream edge 203 of the blade; the beneficial effects of both the turbulence and the ZK pulse may thereby be maximized. It is a further critical feature of this invention that the depth k of the cavity 206 be limited to a value which ensures that the cavity remains fluid filled during normal paper machine operation. If the cavity is too deep relative to the stock thickness thereabove, then the foiling action will stop and the beneficial effect of the formation blade will be lost. The fluid withdrawn from between the fabrics will then be discontinuous, causing an indeterminant, uncontrolled re¬ entry of fluid into the stock layer held between the forming fabrics over the downstream cavity wall. Unless a continuum of liquid flow is provided by the foiling effect developed over the cavity, formation will be adversely affected. Note that in this case, and unlike the blade shown in the prior art forming section of Figure 1, the positive fluid pressure developed at the downstream wall 209 of the cavity 206 does not fall to zero at the downstream contact surface 205. Instead, it remains positive to the end of the cavity 206 before falling to zero somewhere over the surface 205. Because both fabrics wrap about the same formation blade, the pressure of the liquid being forced through the first fabric 213 at the downstream surface 209 of the cavity is opposed and counteracted by the tensions N and M of the two fabrics. The liquid is thus forced to re-enter the space between the fabrics, thereby causing a fluid motion in the stock which serves to reorient the fibers and improve web formation. In Fig. 7 there is shown a representation of the mechanical pressures exerted by the fabrics and stock on the surfaces 204 and 205 of the blade 201. These mechanical pressures are developed in reaction to the forces generated by the angles of wrap of the fabrics and the negative fluid pressure developed at the surface 207 of the cavity. As the fabrics pass over the upstream surface 204, they are positively held down onto this surface by their angles of wrap c and f at the upstream edge 202, if the fabrics are not approaching the blade 201 tangentially. Mechanical pressure on the blade surface 204 in reaction to the wrap angles and negative fluid pressure increase almost immediately to a maximum as shown by curve 240. This mechanical pressure decreases rapidly thereafter to zero over the cavity, and then increases again over surface 205 as the zone of negative fluid pressure at the wall 207 is passed. Thus, the front edge of the cavity is always sealed by the foiling action developed at the surface 207, and the strength of this seal may be enhanced by increasing the angle of wrap c of the fabric 213 on the upstream edge 202. There is no mechanical pressure exerted on the surfaces 207, 208 and 209 of the blade cavity. Mechanical pressure then increases again as at 241 as the fabrics and stock pass over the downstream surface 205 due the ZK pressure pulse generated in the stock, the fabric tensions N and M, and the angles of wrap d and g of the fabrics at the downstream edge 203. Thus, unlike the prior art of Figure 1, the upstream and downstream blade surfaces are effectively sealed thereby preventing stock leakage from between the fabric and the blade surface which would otherwise reduce retention, and the beneficial reorientation and randomizing effects caused by the blade geometry are contained in the stock sandwiched between the fabrics. If the angle of wrap c of the first fabric is small, then the upstream contact surface 204 must have sufficient machine direction width C so as to ensure a reliable seal between the fabric and this blade surface. However, if the angle c is sufficiently large, for example of from about 0.5° to about 1°, then drainage away from the blade, caused by the ZK pulse at this point, will occur and the upstream contact surface 204 can be made relatively small, for example from about 2 mm to 5 mm. If c is small, in the range of from about 0° to about 0.5°, then contact surface 204 must be made larger, for example from about 5 mm to about 25 mm, to ensure a reliable seal. As has been previously noted, the width D of the downstream contact surface 205 is also of importance. We have found that this surface must have sufficient machine direction width such that: i) it is wide enough to oppose a majority of the ZK pulse force which develops as the two fabrics wrap the downstream edge 203 of the formation blade, and ii) the beneficial effects of the ZK pulse created at the downstream edge 203 are not detrimentally affected by the uprushing fluid turbulence created by the cavity 206. The precise width of the downstream contact surface required to fulfill the above mentioned requirements is a function of many variables, such as fabric velocity, pulp drainage resistance, stock weight, fabric tensions and angles of wrap about the formation blades, to name a few. We have found that if the downstream contact surface 205 is wide enough to oppose at least 75% of the ZK pulse developed at the downstream edge 203 then its beneficial effects will be maximized. If this is done, then the downstream contact surface will be sufficiently wide such that the uprushing fluid from the cavity does not interfere with the ZK pulse. Blade surface geometry is thus an application- specific design variable of this invention which must be controlled so as to optimize formation in response to paper machine dynamics and paper making stock conditions. Figures 4 through 7 depict the invention under dynamic papermaking conditions. In practice, the angles of wrap are difficult to measure under these conditions, and it will be understood that, for this invention, these angles must be measured for the static case when the machine is not in operation (i.e.: when there is no stock S between the fabrics 213 and 214) . This case is illustrated in Fig. 8. The angle of wrap of the first fabric 213 about the upstream edge 202 of the blade 201 is c; the angle of wrap of this same fabric at the downstream edge 203 of the same blade 201 is d. Thus, the total angle of wrap of the fabric 213 about the blade 201 is defined for the case when the machine is at rest as e which is equal to the sum of c and d. The angle of wrap of the second fabric 214 about the upstream edge 202 of the blade 201 is f; the angle of wrap of this same fabric at the downstream edge 203 of the blade is g. The total angle of wrap of the fabric 214 about the blade 201 is similarly defined for the case when the machine is at rest as h which is equal to the sum of f and g. Regardless of whether the machine is at rest or in operation, the following relationships must hold true: Total Angle of Wrap of First Fabric = c + d = e Total Angle of Wrap of Second Fabric = f + g = h When the machine is at rest and there is no stock S sandwiched between the fabrics, both fabrics 213 and 214 are parallel and β = h, c = f, and d = g. It is a feature of this invention that the total angle of wrap, β, of the first fabric 213 about the upstream and downstream edges 202 and 203 of the formation blade 201 must be equal to or greater than 0.5° as measured when the paper machine is at rest. The total angle of wrap h of the second fabric 214 about these same edges must also be equal to or greater than 0.5° as measured -when the machine is at rest. Further, each of the fabrics 213 and 214 must wrap the downstream contact surface 203 of the same formation blade 201 with angles of wrap d and g that are each equal to or greater than 0.5° as measured when the machine is at rest. In addition, the first fabric 213 must contact both the upstream and downstream fabric contact surfaces 204 and 205 of the formation blade 201. Thus, for any formation blade in a forming section of the present invention, the angles of wrap e and h of each fabric 213 and 214 about any such blade 201 must simultaneously satisfy the following conditions when the paper machine is at rest: 1 . e ≥ 0 .5° and d > 0 .5°, and 2 . h > 0 .5° and g > 0 .5°, and 3. one fabric must contact both support surfaces of the formation blade. The upstream angle of wrap c of the first fabric 213, and the upstream angle of wrap f of the second fabric 214, may both equal zero (i.e.: c = f = 0) , in which case the first fabric would approach the formation blade 201 tangentially but in contact. When the machine is in operation, a ZK pressure pulse would not occur between the fabrics 213 and 214 just prior to the upstream edge 202 of the blade. However, fluid pressure would still develop in the blade cavity 206, as previously explained, because the first fabric 213 would be sealed at the upstream edge 202 of the blade 201 due to the suction foiling action of the diverging surface 207. A ZK pressure pulse would still occur at the downstream contact surface of the blade because of the angles of wrap of the fabrics and their tensions, as previously explained. The effectiveness of this downstream ZK pulse will be governed by the machine direction width D of the downstream contact surface 205. This surface must have sufficient width so as to ensure that: i) the beneficial effects of the ZK pulse are not detrimentally affected by the uprushing fluid turbulence created by the cavity 206, and ii) about 75% of the ZK pulse occurring proximate the downstream edge 203 is opposed by this surface. In Figure 9 there is shown one embodiment of the present invention in which a plurality of formation blades 300, 301 and 302, whose cross-sectional profile is essentially as described above, are arranged transversely to the direction of travel of the fabrics 213 and 214 on one side of a curved forming shoe in the forming section of a two fabric paper machine. As illustrated in Fig. 9, the paper machine is in operation and the formation blades are arranged so that the fabrics which engage them form a segmented curve. The forming section is arranged such that the first fabric 213 wraps each blade with a total angle of wrap e that is equal to or greater than 0.5° as measured when the machine is at rest. The second fabric 214 also wraps each blade with a total angle of wrap h which is equal to or greater than 0.5° when measured at rest. Both fabrics wrap the downstream contact surface of each blade with an angle of wrap that is equal to or greater than 0.5° as measured when the machine is stationary. Drainage of liquid from between the two fabrics takes place due to the tensions N and M of the fabrics 213 and 214, and their angles of wrap over each blade, thereby diminishing the thickness of the stock as it proceeds downstream. As shown in this Figure, the stock thickness is represented by the letters W, X, Y and Z. As the fabric and stock proceed downstream, the thickness of the stock layer decreases from a relatively high value as at W to a relatively lower value as at Z. Thus, in this embodiment, the depth k of the cavity on each successive blade may be adjusted so as to maintain continuity of fluid flow as the fluid foiled from the stock at the surfaces 207 moves into and out of the blade cavities 206. The depth k of the cavity on the first, upstream blade of the forming section may therefore be greater than that on the last downstream blade. Because cavity depth k is a function of the thickness of stock held between the fabrics above the blade, the depth k will usually decrease from the upstream to the downstream end of the forming section of this invention. The machine direction width D of the downstream fabric contact surfaces of the formation blades utilized in the forming section of this invention may also be varied in accordance with the stock thickness. In general, the width of this downstream contact surface may be decreased as stock thickness is diminished from an upstream to a downstream direction so as to optimize the beneficial formation effects produced by the ZK pulse at the downstream edges of the blades. As previously noted, if the downstream fabric contact surface is sufficiently wide so as to oppose about 75% of the force of the ZK pulse, then the beneficial formation effects provided by the blade cavity in combination with the downstream angles of wrap of the fabrics about the blades will be maximized. However, it is neither necessary nor desirable that all of the blades on the curved forming shoe be formation blades in accordance with the teachings herein. It may be advantageous to intersperse these formation blades with deflector blades or other types of fabric support blades such as are well known in the art. The actual positioning of the formation and other blades in the forming section will vary depending on the type of paper being manufactured, the operating conditions of the machine, the desired level of agitation, and other factors. In Figure 10 there is shown a second embodiment of the present invention in which a plurality of formation blades 401, 402 and 403, substantially as described above, are alternately located on opposing sides of the two fabrics 213 and 214 so as to alternately contact the first fabric 213 and the second fabric 214. The relative stock thickness is shown at F, G and H. The blades are positioned such that each fabric wraps each blade with a total angle of wrap that is equal to or greater than 0.5°, and also so that the two fabrics follow a zig-zag path as they proceed between the formation blades. In this embodiment, the stock is alternately subjected to the fluid pressure phenomena previously described from the opposing fabric sides. Drainage thus occurs alternately through the first and second fabrics 213 and 214 away from the blades so that the thickness of the stock held between the fabrics decreases from a relatively high value F at the upstream end of the forming section to a relatively low value H at the downstream end. Similarly, shearing forces and pulsation effects, caused by the formation blade cavities and the ZK pulses induced at both the upstream and downstream sides of the blades as previously explained, are induced from opposing sides of the two fabrics, thereby thoroughly mixing and redispersing the fibers as the fabrics proceed through the forming section. As has been previously discussed, the angles of wrap of the fabrics about the blades must conform to requirements of the invention. Thus, the first fabric 213 must wrap the first blade 401 with a total angle of wrap that is equal to or greater than 0.5° while in contact with both its upstream and downstream contact surfaces, the second fabric 214 must also wrap the first blade 401 with a total angle of wrap that is equal to or greater than 0.5°, and the angle of wrap of both fabrics 213 and 214 at the edge of the downstream contact surface of the first blade 401 must be equal to or greater than 0.5°. Although the positions of the first and second fabrics 213 and 214 are reversed at the second blade 402 so that 214 becomes the first fabric, and 213 becomes the second fabric, in relation to their relative positions at blade 401, the same requirements noted above must still hold true for both of the fabrics. That is, both fabrics 213 and 214 must wrap the second blade 402 so that their total individual angles of wrap are each equal to or greater than 0.5°, and the second fabric 214 contacts both the upstream and downstream contact surfaces of blade 402, and the angle of wrap of each of the fabrics at the downstream edge of the downstream contact surface of the blade is equal to or greater than 0.5°. At the third blade 403, the relative positions of the fabrics revert back to that described at the first blade 401. Not all of the blades in the forming section described in this embodiment need be formation blades. Other types of forming fabric support structures, such as those well known in the art, may also be located between the formation blades, as long as the requirements of the invention are met. The actual position of the formation blades and other support structures in the forming section will be dependant on the type of paper being manufactured, the operating conditions of the forming section, and other variables as previously noted. The geometry of the formation blade cavities used in this invention may vary, but the angle of divergence of the upstream wall of the cavity from the upstream flat surface must be within the range of from about 1° to about 8°. Similarly, the angle of divergence of the downstream wall of the cavity must also be within the range of from about 1° to about 8°. Surprisingly, we have found that if the angle of the divergence of this downstream wall is greater than 8°, then the beneficial agitation effects induced in the stock by its movement through this cavity is severely diminished. Similarly, the depth k of the cavity on each successive blade, as well as the machine direction width of the downstream contact surface, must be related to the stock thickness at that point, as has been previously discussed. It may be desirable, so as to better control the level of agitation in the stock, to design the blade cavities so that they contain a floor 208 whose machine direction width is greater than zero. If this is done, then the cavity floor may be parallel to a plane intersecting the upstream and downstream edges 202 and 203 of the fabric contacting surfaces, or angularly inclined so as to be at an angle to this plane, provided that the angle never exceeds 8°. Alternatively, blade cavities may be provided which have a somewhat elliptical shape such that a tangent angle to both the upstream and downstream sides of these curved surfaces where they meet the upstream and downstream surfaces must be from about 1° to about 8°. In addition to the limitations noted above, the depth k of the cavity must also be limited so as to preserve continuity of fluid flow into the cavity. Although not all effects are precisely known, it has been found that the maximum effective cavity depth k is a function of the following: i) the ease with which the stock can be withdrawn from the fluid between the fabrics; this is dependent on the stock type, the amount of fiber mat deposited on the fabric upstream from the formation blade, and the drainage of the fabric; ii) the depth of fluid stock S remaining between the fabrics as they pass over the point of maximum depth k of the cavity; and iii) the magnitude and extent of the ZK pressure pulse generated at the downstream edge of the formation blade; if the pulse extends upstream over the cavity, it may inhibit the upward flow of fluid and limit the effectiveness of the blade. We have found in practice that the maximum depth k of the cavity should not exceed 3/4 of the stock thickness S lying thereabove, and a cavity depth that is less than 1/lOth of this thickness has little effect. A more preferred range for the depth of the cavity k is from about 1/2 to about 1/1Oth the thickness of the stock S that is sandwiched between the fabrics as they pass over the cavity. The location of the blade cavity on the fabric bearing surface of the blades is also critical. We have found in practice that the beneficial agitation effects provided by the blades are most effective when the cavity is located proximate the upstream edge of the blade, so that the width C is relatively small. However, beneficial effects may also be obtained by locating the cavity somewhat near the midpoint of the machine direction width of the blade. If the cavity is located downstream from the midpoint of the blade, it appears doubtful that much improvement in web formation will be obtained. The selection of an optimum blade surface geometry for use in the forming section of this invention will be dependent on stock conditions, machine speed, and other variables unique to the particular application. Preferably, the formation blades themselves are provided with a ground ceramic surface so as to preserve the geometry of the fabric contacting surfaces. The ceramic material from which these surfaces are formed may be selected from the group consisting of, but not limited to, the following: aluminum oxide, toughened alumina, zirconia, silicon nitride, silicon carbide or titanate. Alternatively, wear resistant inserts may be installed into either or both the upstream and downstream contact surfaces of the blades as taught by Buchanan in US 3,446,702 so as to form the fabric contacting surfaces. Preferably, these inserts are comprised of one of the ceramic materials noted above, but other wear resistant materials may also be used. The blade body may be made of an easily machineable material, such as high density, high molecular weight polyethylene. It is preferred that the formation blades in the forming section of this invention as shown in Figure 4 be mounted on T-shaped rails which engage T-shaped slots formed in the bottom of the blade, as described by White, US 3,337,394. It is critical in this mounting that the manufacturing tolerances of the T-slot and the T-bar minimize rocking of the blades. The magnitude of this blade rocking should not exceed ± 0.25° and is preferably less. Other mounting means which minimize blade rocking to within the aforementioned limits may be employed to position the formation blades in the forming section of this invention. Since very small angles are important in this invention, accurate maintenance of the blade orientations so as to preserve their alignment with respect to the fabrics is critical. Experimental Test Results Tests on a gap former running at 1,027 m/min making 36 grams per square meter directory grade paper showed significant improvements in both sheet porosity and formation when 11 of the 13 standard shoe blades were replaced with formation blades in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. The formation blades were equipped to be installed on the formation shoe using T-bar mounts whose centre-to-centre spacing was 114 mm. The total shoe wrap angle was 16°, thus providing a total angle of wrap per blade of 1.33°. The 70 mm wide formation blades were provided with a V-shaped shallow cavity having 25.4mm side walls which were symmetrically angled downwards at 2° from the upstream and downstream contact surfaces " to provide a depth k of 0.89 mm. The blades were provided with 9.5 mm upstream and downstream contact surfaces. These formation blades were shown to improve the formation index of the sheet as measured by a Reed N.U.I (Non Uniformity Index) Mark II Formation Tester by 2.0, and reduced sheet porosity by 19% when operating on the shoe at normal vacuum conditions. While the present invention has been described with respect to two preferred embodiments, it will be understood that it should not be limited . Various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims: We Claim 1. A forming section, for use in a two-fabric paper making machine, comprising in combination: (i) a first and a second endless moving forming fabric loop, both loops having a linear machine direction tension through the forming section and moving in a joint run from an upstream to a downstream direction, and between which fabrics a layer of stock of known thickness is conveyed; (ii) at least one formation blade extending transversely to the direction of fabric travel and in contact with the first fabric such that under the machine direction tension both fabrics with stock therebetween wrap about the at least one blade; (iii) the at least one formation blade has a top face, a bottom, and upstream and downstream fabric contacting edges; (iv) the top face of the at least one blade having two substantially coplanar upstream and downstream surfaces in contact with the first fabric with a cavity intervening therebetween; (v) the cavity having upstream and downstream divergent walls with an intermediate intervening surface therebetween, the upstream cavity wall diverging from the upstream fabric contact surface at an angle of from 1° to 8°, the downstream cavity wall diverging from the downstream fabric contact surface at an angle of from 1° to 8° so as to define a cavity whose depth from the plane of the substantially coplanar contact surfaces to the intermediate intervening surface is from about 1/lOth to about 3/4 the thickness of the stock which is conveyed between the first and second fabrics over the cavity; (vi) the first fabric wrapping about the edges of the at least one blade so as to have a total angle of wrap that is equal to or greater than 0.5° while in contact with both the upstream and downstream contact surfaces; (vii) the second fabric also wrapping the edges of the at least one blade so as to have a total angle of wrap that is equal to or greater than 0.5°; and (viii) both first and second fabrics wrap about the downstream edge of .the downstream contact surface of the at least one blade with an angle of wrap that is equal to or greater than 0.5°. 2. A forming section according to Claim 1 wherein the bottom of the formation blades are provided with a mounting means for locating the blade in the forming section whereby rocking of the blade on the mounting means is restricted to a value that is no more than ±0.25°. 3. A forming section according to Claim 1 wherein the downstream fabric contact face of the at least one blade is sufficiently wide so as to oppose at least 75% of the force of the ZK pulse generated by the angles of wrap of the forming fabrics. 4. A forming section according to Claim 1 including a plurality of formation blades. 5. A forming section according to Claim 4 wherein the formation blades are disposed on the same side of the two fabrics. 6. A forming section according to Claim 4 wherein the formation blades are disposed on both sides of the two fabrics. 7. A forming section according to Claim 1 wherein the at least one formation blade is detachably mounted. 8. A forming section according to Claim 1 wherein the fabric contacting surfaces of the at least one formation blade contain inserts of a wear resistant material. 9. A forming section according to Claim 8 wherein the inserts are of a ceramic material. 10. A forming section according to Claim 1 wherein the top face of the at least one formation blade is a ground ceramic surface. 11. A forming section according to Claim 5 wherein all of the formation blades are arranged transversely to the direction of fabric travel along the radius of a curved forming shoe. 12. A forming section according to Claim 6 wherein the formation blades are disposed on opposite sides of the two fabrics so as to cause the fabrics to follow a zig-zag path. 13. A forming section according to Claim 1 wherein in the at least one blade the depth of the cavity from the plane of the substantially coplanar fabric contact surfaces to the intermediate intervening surface is from about 1/lOth to about 1/2 the thickness of the stock which is conveyed between the first and second fabrics over the cavity. 14. A forming section according to Claim 2 including a plurality of formation blades. 15. A forming section according to Claim 14 wherein the formation blades are disposed on the same side of the two fabrics. 16. A forming section according to Claim 14 wherein the formation blades are disposed on both sides of the two fabrics. 17. A forming section according to Claim 2 wherein the at least one formation blade is detachably mounted. 18. A forming section according to Claim 15 wherein all of the formation blades are arranged transversely to the direction of fabric travel along the radius of a curved forming shoe. 19. A forming section according to Claim 16 wherein the formation blades are alternately located on opposite sides of the two fabrics so as to cause the fabrics to follow a zig-zag path. 20. A forming section according to Claim 2 wherein in the at least one blade the depth of the cavity from the plane of the substantially coplanar fabric contact surfaces to the intermediate intervening surface is from about 1/lOth to about 1/2 the thickness of the stock which is conveyed between the first and second fabrics over the cavity.

Inventors: BUCHMANN WERNER, MCMAHON MICHAEL, PITT RICHARD, BUCHMANN, WERNER, MCMAHON, MICHAEL, PITT, RICHARD
Applicants: JWI LTD, JWI LTD.
Application year: 1995
Main classification: D21F9
IPC codes: D21F1, D21F9