DETECTING BACTERIA

Abstract: There is disclosed a method and apparatus for detecting bacteria comprising detecting gas or vapour associated with the bacteria.

Description: DETECTING BACTERIA This invention relates to detecting bacteria. Bacteria are identified in a variety of ways. Many have characteristic forms which can be seen under microscopic examination, but some are identified, when colonised on a growth medium, by a characteristic colour and in some cases this is confirmed by smell. Not all bacteria have any appreciable odour, but many have a characteristic associated gas or vapour. The invention comprises a method for detecting bacteria comprising detecting gas or vapour associated with the metabolic activity of the bacteria. The detection can be used for identification by differentiating the gas or vapour from that associated with other bacteria. The method may comprise abstracting gas or vapour from a detection region and flowing the same over an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapours and observing the response of the sensors. The sensors may comprise semi-conducting polymers the resistance or impedance of which varies according to exposure to gases or vapours. The response of the sensors may be compared against a library of responses to known bacteria, or the response may be input to a neural net trained against known bacteria. The detection region may comprise an enclosed space above a Petri dish or like laboratory culture dish. The array of sensors may first be purged using a purging gas. The invention also comprises apparatus for detecting bacteria comprising detector means for detecting a gas or vapour associated with the bacteria. Said detector means may comprise an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapours. The sensors may comprise semi-conducting polymers the resistance or impedance of which varies according to exposure to gases or vapours. The apparatus may comprise a store for a library of responses to known bacteria and comparison means operable automatically to compare a given response against the library. The apparatus may also comprise a neural net the input to which comprises the array of sensors and which is trained against known bacteria. The apparatus may comprise a probe for sampling a detection region by abstracting gas or vapour from said region to be passed to said detector means. Said probe may comprise a cover for enclosing a Petri or like laboratory culture dish or an area of growth medium thereon. Said probe may comprise a carrier gas feed and return and the apparatus may comprise a source of carrier gas. Embodiments of apparatus and methods for detecting bacteria according to the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which : Figure 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a first embodiment; Figure 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of a second embodiment; Figure 3 is a diagrammatic illustration of an arrangement for detecting bacteria on a culture dish; Figure 4 is a diagrammatic illustration of an arrangement for detecting bacteria in a nutrient broth; and Figure 5 is a cluster analysis of vapour associated with three species of bacteria. The drawings illustrate methods and apparatus for detecting bacteria comprising detecting gas or vapour associated with the bacteria, and, further, methods for identifying bacteria by differentiating such gas or vapour from gas or vapour associated with other bacteria. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate abstracting gas or vapour from a detection region 11 and flowing the same over an array 12 of sensors 13 of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapours and observing the response of the sensors 13. The sensors 13 comprise semi-conducting polymers the resistance or impedance of which varies according to exposure to gases or vapours. An array 12 of twenty sensors has been employed to distinguish the vapours associated with the bacteria Straphylococcus aureus, Eschericia coli and Group A beta-haemolytic streptococci. Eight epidermiologically unrelated patient isolates of each species were recovered from frozen storage. Each bacteria isolate was cultured overnight in nutrient broth 40 in a glass Duran bottle 42 with a GL-45 screw cap. After overnight incubation at 37°C the cap was changed for a cap 44 with inlet and outlet ports. After a period of equilibration at 37°C the headspace vapour above the broth 40 was analysed by pumping same across the 20 sensor array 12 at a flow rate of I^ 150 ml min~ . The outputs of the sensors 13 were analysed by computing means 46 employing the non-linear cluster analysis mapping technique of Sammon (Sammon Jr., J. ., IEEE Trans, on computers, Vol. C-18, No. 5, May 1969, pp401-409). Figure 5 shows the results of this analysis, indicating that excellent separation is achieved between the clusters 50,52,54 associated with straphylococcus aureus, Eschericia coli and Group A beta-haemolytic streptococci respectively. Figure 1 illustrates comparing the response of the sensors 13 against a library 14 of responses to known bacteria. Figure 2 illustrates inputting the response to a neural net 15 trained against known bacteria. Figure 3 illustrates a further sampling arrangement wherein the detection region 11 comprises an enclosed space above a Petri dish 16 or like laboratory culture dish. A probe 17 comprises a cover for enclosing an area of bacterial growth 18 on a growth medium 19 in the dish 16. The probe 17 comprises a carrier gas feed 21 feeding a carrier gas such for example as purified air or nitrogen. Prior to taking gas or vapour from a sample in, say, a Petri dish, the array 12 of sensors 13 is first purged of any residual substances from a previous sensing operation by directing over the sensors 13 a stream of purging gas, which, in this instance, is the same as the carrier gas. The gas is supplied from a pressure bottle 22. The sensors 13 can be selected for sensitivity to a broad spectrum of gases or vapours associated with bacteria and the apparatus may also be arranged to indicate concentration by measuring the level of response. A broader spectrum and a greater sensitivity will be obtained from a given array size by using a.c. technology as taught in EP-B-0 286 307 than by simply measuring d.c. resistance. In addition to bacteria, the method may be applied to the detection of microfungi. It may be important to specify the state of the microorganism when making an observation. Gases or vapours associated with growing bacteria or microfungi may well be different from gases or vapours associated with the same organism in growth-arrest stage or when it has been weakened or killed. However, the library may contain data on the gases or vapours associated with microorganisms in all possible states, or the neural net trained to recognise them, so the apparatus may also identify the state as well as the microorganism.

Claims: 1. A method for detecting bacteria comprising detecting gas or vapour associated with the bacteria. 2. A method for identifying bacteria comprising detecting gas or vapour associated with the bacteria and differentiating such gas or vapour from gas or vapour associated with other bacteria. 3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2, comprising abstracting gas or vapour from a detection region and flowing the same over an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapours and observing the response of the sensors. 4. A method according to claim 3, in which the sensors comprised semi-conducting polymers the resistance or impedance of which varies according to exposure to gases or vapours. 5. A method according to claim 3 or claim 4, comprising the response of the sensors against a library of responses to known bacteria. 6. A method according to claim 3 or claim 4, comprising inputting the response to a neural net trained against known bacteria. 7. A method according to any one of claims 3 to 6, in which the detection region comprises an enclosed space above a Petri dish or like laboratory culture dish. 8. A method according to any one of claims 3 to 7, in which the array of sensors is first purged using a purging gas. 9. Apparatus for detecting bacteria comprising detector means for detecting a gas or vapour associated with the bacteria. 10. Apparatus according to claim 9, said detector means comprising an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to the gases or vapours. 11. Apparatus according to claim 10, in which the sensors comprise semi-conducting polymers the resistance or impedance of which varies according to exposure to gases or vapours. 12. Apparatus according to claim 10 or claim 11, comprising a store for a library of responses to known bacteria and comparison means operable automatically to compare a given response against the library. 13. Apparatus according to claim 10 or claim 11, comprising a neural net the input to which comprises the array of sensors and which is trained against known bacteria. 14. Apparatus according to any one of claims 9 to 13, comprising a probe for sampling a detection region by abstracting gas or vapour from said region to be passed to said detector means. 15. Apparatus according to claim 14, said probe comprising a cover for enclosing a Petri or like laboratory culture dish or an area of growth medium thereon. 16. Apparatus according to claim 15, said probe comprising a carrier gas feed and return. 17. Apparatus according to claim 16, comprising a source of carrier gas.

Inventors: PAYNE PETER ALFRED, PERSAUD KRISHNA CHANDRA, PAYNE, PETER, ALFRED, PERSAUD, KRISHNA, CHANDRA
Applicants: AROMASCAN PLC, PAYNE PETER ALFRED, PERSAUD KRISHNA CHANDRA, PAYNE, PETER, ALFRED, PERSAUD, KRISHNA, CHANDRA
Application year: 1995
Main classification: C12Q1
IPC codes: C12M1, C12Q1