OLIGONUCLEOTIDES AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS

Abstract: The present invention relates to oligonucleotide probes useful in detecting, e.g. by hybridization or the ligase chain reaction, Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in the presence of other related DNA. The present invention is also directed to methods of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis organisms in a sample using the ligase chain reaction.

Description: OLIGONUCLEOTIDES AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to oligonucleotides useful in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis, e.g., by the ligase chain reaction (LCR) methods. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Microorganisms of the genus Chlamydia are obligate intracellular parasites of eukai otic cells. They grow and multiply in the host cell forming an inclusion in the cytoplasm of the cell and cause a host of clinical syndromes. The genus Chlamydia is made up of three distinct species: Chlamydia psittaci, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Of these species, Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae are commonly pathogenic for humans causing diseases such as conjunctivitis, trachoma genital infections, and pneumonia. To detect Chlamydia trachomatis, clinical specimens are inoculated onto eukaiyotic cell culture monolayers, incubated for 48 hours or more, then stained with either iodine or Giemsa. Various immunofluorescence assays are also used to detect Chlamydia trachomatis antigens and to detect antibodies produced in response to chlamydial infection. The use of immunofluorescence for detection of chlamydial antigens involves exposing clinical specimens suspected of containing chlamydia to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FTT labeled monoclonal antibodies directed to chlamydial antigens. Immunofluorescence techniques for the detection of anti-chlamydial antibodies include microimmunofluorescence (MIF) and indirect immunofluorescence. MIF assays are performed by fixing purified organisms to microscope slides. Both MIF and indirect immunofluorescence utilize Chlamydia as a reagent for the detection of antibodies to the organism in patient specimens. MEF utilizes purified Chlamydia fixed to a glass slide while indirect immunofluorescence utilizes Chlamydia growing in tissue culture cells as intracytoplasmic inclusions on the periphery of the nucleus of infected cells. Enzyme immunoassays are also used for the detection of Chlamydia species. All of these methods are laborious and time consuming. Nucleic acid hybridization techniques such as dot blots, slot blots, Southern blots, solution hybridization, and in situ hybridization have been proposed as potentially useful methods for detecting a variety of pathogens including Chlamydia trachomatis. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedures such as described in US. Patent No. 4,683,195 to Mullis et al. have also been proposed for use in detection of a variety of pathogens. PCT application No. WO 88/03957 published June 25, 1988 by Hogan et al, addresses the detection of non-viral organisms using nucleic acid hybridization techniques. The method comprises constructing an oUgonucleotide that is complementary to a region of ribbsomal RNA selected to be unique to a particular non-viral organism sought to be distinguished. The Hogan application addresses oUgonucleotide sequences which may be useful in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis including sequences directed to 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA corresponding to sequences at bases 60-105, 175-210, 600-635, and 830-870, respectively of E. coli rRNA, and to sequences at bases 275-320, 330-365, 1160-1190, 1450-1490, 1510-1545, and 1710-1750, respectively of E. coli 23S RNA. The appUcation also addresses probes directed to numerous other non- viral organisms. Of additional interest to the background of the invention, is an alternate method for nucleic acid amplification known as the Ugase chain reaction (LCR). In LCR, probe pairs are used which include two primary (first and second probes) and two secondary (third and fourth) probes all of which are employed in molar excess to target. The first probe hybridizes to a first segment of the target strand and the second probe hybridizes to a second segment of the target strand, the first and second segments being contiguous so that the primary probes abut one another in 5 * phosphate-3' hydroxyl relationship and so that a Ugase can covalently fuse or Ugate the two probes into a fused product In addition, a third (secondary) probe can hybridize to a portion of the first probe and a fourth (secondary) probe can hybridize to a portion of the second probe in a similar abutting fashion. Of course, if the target is initially double stranded, the secondary probes will also hybridize to the target complement in the first instance. Once the Ugated strand of primary probes is separated from the target strand, it will hybridize with the third and fourth probes which can be Ugated to form a complementary, secondary Ugated product It is important to realize that the Ugated products are functionaUy equivalent to either the target or its complement By repeated cycles of hybridization and Ugation, amplification of the target sequence is achieved. This technique is described more completely in EP-A- 320308 to K. Backman pubUshed June 16, 1989 and EP-A-439 182 to K. Backman et al., published July 31, 1991 both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Despite the currently available techniques, there remains a need for a sensitive, rapid, specific and reproducible technique for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention is directed to oUgonucleotide probes useful for specific detection of target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis. Such an oUgonucleotide probe is from 10 to about 50 nucleotides long and possesses sufficient complementarity or homology to the sequences shown in SEQ ID NOS. 1, 6, 11, 16 or 21 to hybridize with such sequence or its complement under hybridizing conditions, as defined herein. Sufficient complementarity or homology generaUy requires about 80% to 100% complementarity or homology. Shorter probes typicaUy require higher percentage ranges, while longer probes typicaUy are useful with lower percentage ranges. Preferred are probes in the range of 15 to 40, usuaUy about 20-25 nucleotides in length. Such an oUgonucleotide probe detects at least two Chlamydia trachomatis serovars, preferably three or more, and ideaUy 10 or more serovars, while not cross reacting substantiaUy with other related organisms, including other organisms of the Chlamydia genus. Preferred examples of such oUgonucleotide probes of the invention are the probes of SEQ ID NOS. 2-5, 7-10, 12-15, 17-20 and 22-25. The present invention is also directed to compositions of two or more, preferably four, oUgonucleotide probes for detecting target DNA from Chlamydia t .rachomatis, including probe set 1 (SEQ ID NOS.2-5), probe set 2 (SEQ ID NOS.7-10), probe set 3 (SEQ ID NOS. 12-15), probe set 4 (SEQ ID NOS. 17-20), and probe set 5 (SEQ ID NOS.22-25) as defined herein, and combinations and subcombinations thereof. Another aspect of the invention is a method for detecting target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis comprising the steps of providing a sample suspected of containing target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis, hybridizing with sample DNA an oUgonucleotide probe as described above for hybridizing with one of the sequences, SEQ ID NOS. 1, 6, 11, 16 or 21, as defined herein, wherein the oUgonucleotide probe is preferably labeled with a reporter group capable of directly or indirectly generating a signal, and determining the presence of target DNA by detecting hybrids, usuaUy by detecting the signal generated by the reporter. In another of its aspects, the present invention provides methods for amplifying and detecting target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis using the Ugase chain reaction (LCR) with labeled oUgonucleotide probes as described above. These methods generally comprise providing a sample suspected of containing the target DNA and one or more sets of four probes according to the invention, wherein at least one probe of the probe set preferably bears a reporter group capable of detection, and performing a Ugase chain reaction prior to detecting the reporter group. In an especially preferred variation of the LCR, probes are provided in modified form so that they cannot be Ugated to one another prior to a target-dependent correction step. In one preferred method, modified probe sets include at least one gap which must be filled prior to Ugation. Gap filling in a target- dependent manner can be accompUshed by providing the appropriate deoxynucleotide triphosphate(s), but in any event less than aU four deoxynucleotide triphosphates and a polymerase reagent The foUowing steps are then performed at least once: mixing the probe set with the sample suspected of containing the target DNA; denaturing hybridized targets and hybridized probes; hybridizing the denatured probes to the denatured target DNA; correcting probe modifications, if present, in a template-dependent manner thereby generating adjacent probes; Ugating the adjacent probes using the Ugase to form reorganized probes; and detecting the label in the reorganized probes. "Correction" as used herein is used in the same sense as in EP 439,182. Additional aspects of the invention include kits useful for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. The kits comprise one or more suitable containers containing one or more probe sets according to the present invention, a Ugase reagent and a polymerase reagent, and one or more, but not all four deoxynucleotide triphosphates. TypicaUy, at least one probe from the probe set bears a label or reporter group, but detection is possible without this. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES Figure 1 iUustrates Chlamydia trachomatis MOMP specific target DNAs and oUgonucleotide probes aUgned with their respective targets. Figure 2 iUustrates Chlamydia .trachomatis cryptic plasmid specific target DNAs and oUgonucleotide probes aUgned with their respective targets. In probe sets 1-4 of the Figures, CZ represents a carbazole derived hapten and AD represents an adamantane derived hapten. In probe set 5, B represents a biotin moiety and F represents a fluorescein moiety. These labels are described further in the text It should be understood that the figures and SEQ ID NOs. depict exact sequences of the probes, but that modifications or variations thereof that result in probes having similar properties (e.g. detection of C. trachomatis DNA) are also deemed to be within the scope and spirit of the invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION OUgonucleotide sequences (SEQ ID NOS. 1-15) (Figure 1) of the present invention are derived from the gene coding for the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) of Chlamydia trachomatis as described by Baehr, W. et al., Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. (USA), 85,4000-4004 (1988). The gene is at least 1120 nucleotides long and is typically present in one copy per organism. Other oUgonucleotides corresponding to (SEQ ID NOS. 16-25) (Figure 2) of the present invention were derived from a cryptic plasmid found in Chlamydia trachomatis (Hatt, C, et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 16 (9):4053-4067). The cryptic plasmid, typicaUy present in 7-10 copies per organism, is 7498 base pairs in length and contains several open reading frames. The modified Ugase chain reaction (LCR) utilized in the present invention uses two pairs of probes herein designated A, B (primary probes), and A', B' (secondary probes). A' is substantiaUy complementary to A, and B' is substantiaUy complementary to B. Because of the antiparaUel nature of DNA, probes A and B' are referred to herein as "upstream" probes, having their 3' end proximate their partners B and A', respectively; while probes B and A' are "downstream". At least one probe of one of the probe pairs initiaUy includes a "modified" end which renders the hybridized probes "nonblunt" and/or not a suitable substrate for the Ugase catalyzed fusion of the two probe duplexes. A "modified end" is defined with respect to the point of Ugation rather than with respect to its complementary probe. Although other "modified ends" are known and within the scope of this invention, aU "modified ends" described herein have omitted bases to create a "gap" between upstream and downstream probes when the probe pair is annealed to a target sequence. The presence of these modified ends reduces the falsely positive signal created by blunt-end Ugation of complementary probe duplexes to one another in the absence of target. "Correction" of the modification is subsequently carried out to render the probes Ugatable. As used herein "correction" refers to the process of rendering, in a target dependent manner, the two primary probes or the two secondary probes Ugatable to their partners. Thus, only those probes hybridized to target, target complement or polynucleotide sequences generated therefrom are "corrected." "Correction" can be accompUshed by several procedures, depending on the type of modified end used. Correction by gap fiUing is exemplified herein. This utilizes a template-dependent polymerase and the requisite deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) to extend the upstream probe until its terminus is adjacent the downstream probe. The requisite dNTP(s) is/are determined based upon the target sequence. As used herein, "point of Ugation" or "intended point of Ugation" refers to a specific location between two probe partners that are to be Ugated in a template-dependent manner. It is the site at which the "corrected" probe Ues adjacent its partner in 3 1 hydroxyl-5' phosphate relationship. For each set of four LCR probes there are two "points of Ugation", a point for the primary probe partners and a point for the secondary probe partners. In conventional LCR the two points of Ugation are opposite one another, thus forming blunt ended duplexes when the probe pairs hybridize to one another. In the LCR method used in the embodiments of the present invention, the points of Ugation are not opposite one another, but are displaced from one another by one or more bases by virtue of the gaps. The exact point(s) of Ugation varies depending on the sequences chosen and, thus is further defined in the context of each embodiment. Each of the probes comprises deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) which may be routinely synthesized using conventional nucleotide phosphoramidite chemistry and the instruments available from AppUed Biosystems, Inc., (Foster City, CA); DuPont, (Wilmington, DE); or MiUigen, (Bedford, MA). Phosphorylation of the 5' ends of the appropriate probes, while necessary for Ugation by Ugase, may be accompUshed by a kinase or by commercial synthesis reagents, as is known in the art It may also be desirable to utilize one or more ribonucleotide residues in a probe. In general, the LCR methods useful in the practice of the present invention comprise denaturation, then repeated steps of (a) hybridizing the modified probes to the target (and, if double stranded so that target complement is present, to the target complement); (b) correcting the modification in a target dependent manner to render the probes Ugatable; (c) Ugating the corrected probe to its partner to form a fused or Ugated product; and (d) dissociating the Ugated product from the target and repeating the hybridization, correction and Ugation steps to ampUfy the desired target sequence. Steps (a), (c) and (d) are essentiaUy the same for aU of the embodiments and can be discussed together. Step (b) varies depending on the type of modification employed, but only gap filling is discussed herein. Hybridization of probes to target (and optionaUy to target complement) is widely known in the art and is iUustrated in EP-A-320308. Probe length, probe concentration and stringency of conditions all affect the degree and rate at which hybridization wUl occur. Preferably, the probes are sufficiently long to provide the desired specificity; i.e., to avoid being hybridizable to nontarget sequences in the sample. Typically, probes on the order of 15 to 100 bases serve this purpose. Presently preferred are probes having a length of about 15 to about 40 bases. The probes are added in approximately equimolar concentration since they are expected to react stoichiometricaUy. Each probe is generaUy present in a concentration ranging from about 5 nanomolar (nM) to about 90 nM; preferably from about 10 nM to about 35 nM. For a typical reaction volume of 200 μL, this is equivalent to adding from about 1.2 x lθl2 to about 4 x 10 2 molecules of each probe; and around 2 x 10---2 molecules per 200 μL has been a good starting point however, reaction volumes may vary. The optimum quantity of probe used for each reaction also varies depending on the number of cycles which must be performed and the reaction volume. Probe concentrations can readily be determined by one of ordinary skill in this art to provide optimum signal for a given number of cycles. "Hybridization" or "hybridizing" conditions is defined generally as conditions which promote nucleation and annealing. It is weU known in the art, however, that such annealing is dependent in a rather predictable manner on several parameters, including temperature, ionic strength, probe length and G:C content of the probes. For example, " lowering the temperature of the reaction promotes annealing. For any given set of probes, melt temperature, or Tm, can be estimated by any of several known methods. TypicaUy, diagnostic appUcations utilize hybridization temperatures which are sUghtly below the melt temperature. Ionic strength or "salt" concentration also impacts the melt temperature, since smaU cations tend to stabilize the formation of duplexes by negating the negative charge on the phosphodiester backbone. Typical salt concentrations depend on the nature and valency of the cation but are readily understood by those skiUed in the art Similarly, high G:C content and increased probe length are also known to stabilize duplex formation because G:C pairings involve 3 hydrogen bonds where A:T pairs have just two, and because longer probes have more hydrogen bonds holding the probes together. Thus a high G:C content and longer probe lengths impact the "hybridization conditions" by elevating the melt temperature. Once probes are selected for a given diagnostic appUcation, the G:C content and length wiU be known and can be accounted for in determining precisely what "hybridization conditions" wiU encompass. Since ionic strength is typicaUy optimized for enzymatic activity, the only parameter left to vary is the temperature. For improved specificity, the hybridization temperature is selected sUghtly below the Tm of the probe; typicaUy 2-10 "C below the Tm. Thus, obtaining suitable "hybridization conditions" for a particular probe set and system is well within ordinary skiU of one practicing this art FoUowing provision of the probes, the next step in the LCR method utilized in the present invention is the specific correction step which creates "adjacent" probes, foUowed by the Ugation of one probe to its adjacent partner. Thus, each corrected primary probe is Ugated to its associated primary probe and each corrected secondary probe is Ugated to its associated secondary probe. Correction may be accomplished using a DNA polymerase and most preferred is a thermostable DNA polymerase which obviates the need for adding additional polymerase for every cycle. The Ugation of "adjacent probes" generates "reorganized probes". Since enzymatic Ugation is the preferred method of covalently attaching two adjacent probes, the term "Ugation" wiU be used throughout the appUcation. However, "Ugation" is a general term and is to be understood to include any method of covalently attaching two probes. One alternative to enzymatic Ugation is photo-Ugation as described in EP-A-324616. The conditions and reagents which make possible the preferred enzymatic Ugation step are generaUy known to those of ordinary skill in the art Ligating reagents useful in the present invention include T4 Ugase, and prokaryotic Ugases such as E. coli DNA Ugase, and Thermus thermophilus DNA Ugase (e.g., ATCC 27634) as taught in EP-320308 and in EP-373962. This latter Ugase is presently preferred for its abiUty to maintain activity during the thermal cycling of LCR. Absent a thermaUy stable Ugase, the Ugase must be added each time the cycle is repeated. Also useful are eukaiyotic Ugases, including DNA Ugase of Drosophila, reported by Rabin, et al., J. Biol. Chem. 261:10637-10647 (1986). Once Ugated, the Ugated (reorganized) probe is dissociated (e.g. melted) from the target and, as with conventional LCR, the process is repeated for several cycles. The number of repeat cycles may vary from 1 to about 100, although from about 15 to about 70 are preferred presently. It is desirable to design probes so that when hybridized to their complementary (secondary) probes, the ends away from the point of intended Ugation are not able themselves to participate in other unwanted Ugation reactions. Thus, Ugatable sticky or blunt ends should be avoided. If such ends must be used, then 5' terminal phosphates should be avoided, eUminated or blocked. This can be accomplished either through synthesizing oUgonucleotide probes (which normaUy cany no 5' terminal phosphate groups), or through the use of phosphatase enzymes to remove terminal phosphates (e.g. from oUgonucleotides generated through restriction digests of DNA). Alternatively, Ugation of the "wrong" outside ends of the probes can be prevented by blocking the end of at least one of the probes with a "hook" or marker moiety as wiU be described in detail below. It should be appreciated that the use of four probes, as described above, produces the greatest ampUfication since the Ugated or reorganized probes themselves can serve as target-equivalent templates in further cycles, thus resulting in exponential amplification. However, it is also possible to use just two probes extended and Ugated on a single strand, such as is described in US patent 5,185,243, as a detection method Repeated steps of this nature wUl result (in the absence of the complementary probes) in a linear amplification. One skiUed in the art can eastty select the appropriate probe pairs from the probe sets (e.g. probes A and B; or probes B' and A') for Ugation pairs. FoUowing amplification, the amplified sequences can be detected by a number of conventional ways known in the art. Unlabeled probes can be detected foUowing sepration on a gel on the basis of weight or length, and staining with a suitable dye as is known in the art More typicaUy, detection is performed after separation of free labeled probe from labeled Ugation products, by determining the amount of label in one of the separated fractions. Separation may be accompUshed by electrophoresis, by chromatography, including immunόchromatography, by filtration, by the preferred specific Ugand capture method described below, or by a combination of these methods. The labeled probe(s) contains a reporter group or label that is directly or indirectly capable of detection. Direct labels include chromogens, catalysts such as enzymes, fluorescent compounds, luminescent compounds, chemttuminescent compounds, and radioactive elements such as 32 P or 3 H. Indirect labels include specific binding Ugands as described below. In a particularly preferred configuration, haptens, or "hooks" are attached as reporter groups at the available outside ends of at least two probes (opposite ends of fused product), and preferably to the outside ends of all four probes. A "hook" is any Ugand or moiety having an affinity to a binding partner. Typically, the hook(s) at one end of the fused product (e.g. the 5 * end of first upstream probe A and the 3' end of second downstream probe A') comprises an antigen or hapten capable of being immobiUzed by a specific binding reagent (such as antibody or avidin) coated onto a solid phase. The hook(s) at the other end (e.g. the 3' end of first downstream probe B and the 5' end of second upstream probe B 1 ) contains a different antigen or hapten capable of being recognized by a label or a label system such as an antibody-enzyme conjugate. Exemplary hooks include but are not limited to haptens (such as those described below) complementary polynucleotide "tail" regions, lectin/carbohydrate pairs, enzymes and their co-factors, and others known in the art. Many different haptens are known in the art, and virtuaUy any hapten can be used with the present invention, provided it does not interfere with hybridization or Ugation. Some illustrative haptens include many drugs (e.g. digoxin, theophylline, phencyclidine (PCP), saUcylate, etc.), T3, biotin, fluorescein (FTTC), dansyl, 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP); and modified nucleotides such as bromouracil and bases modified by incorporation of a N-acetyl-7-iodo-2-fluorenylamino (AIF) group; as well as many others. Certain haptens described herein are disclosed in co-pending, co-owned patent applications US. 07/808,508 (adamantaneacetic acids), US. 07/808,839 (carbazoles and dibenzofurans), both filed December 17, 1991; US. 07/858,929 (acridines), and US. 07/ 858,820 (quinolines), both filed March 27, 1992. The entire disclosure of each of the above- mentioned previously filed hapten applications is incorporated herein by reference. Many methods of adding haptens to probes are known in the Uterature. Enzo Biochemical (New York) and Clontech (Palo Alto) both have described and commerciaUzed probe labeling techniques. For example, a primary amine can be attached to a 3' oligo terminus using 3'-Amine-ON CPG™ (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). Similarly, a primary amine can be attached to a 5' oligo terminus using Aminomodifier II® (Clontech). The amines can be reacted to various haptens using conventional activation and Unking chemistries. In addition, copending appUcations US. Serial Nos. 625,566, filed December 11, 1990 and 630,908, filed December 20, 1990 teach methods for labeling probes at their 5' and 3' termini, respectively. Both the aforementioned copending appUcations are incorporated by reference. PubUcations WO92/10505, pubUshed 25 June 1992 and WO 92 11388 pubUshed 9 July 1992 teach methods for labeling probes at their 5' and 3' ends respectively. According to one known method for labeling an oUgonucleotide, a label-phosphoramidite reagent is prepared and used to add the label to the oUgonucleotide during its synthesis. For example, see Thuong, N. T. et al., Tet. Letters, 29(46):5905-5908 (1988); or Cohen, J.S. et al., pubUshed U.S. Patent Application 07/246,688 (NTIS ORDER No. PAT-APPL-7-246,688) (1989). Thus, exemplary Ugated oUgonucleotides may have a carbazole at one end and an adamantane at the other end for the detection by the IMx® instrument (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) using the microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) technology. The assay protocol is similar to that used in the commercially available alpha- fetoprotein assay, with the foUowing adaptations: (1) the anti-alpha-fetoprotein antibody coated microparticles are replaced with anti-carbazole antibody coated microparticles; and (2) the conjugates of anti-alpha fetoprotein antibodies:alkaline phosphatase are replaced with the conjugates of anti-3-phenyl-l-adamantaneacetic acid antibodies:alkaline phosphatase. Protocols for Microparticle Enzyme ImmunoAssays (MEIAs), such as are performed on the Abbott IMx® instrument are further described in EP-A-439,182, in EP- A-288793 and in Fiore, M. et al Clin. Chem., 34/9:1726-1732 (1988). An exemplary protocol is as foUows. 100 μL of the sample which has been amplified by LCR is pipetted into the sample weU. 30-50 μL of this sample is then pipetted into the incubation well, the anticarbazole antibody coated microparticles are added to the weU. An appropriate period of incubation foUows which aUows the formation of a complex consisting of anticarbazole antibodies and nucleic acid sequences with the carbazole ends. After the incubation, the mixture is pipetted onto the glass fiber capture matrix of the IMx® reaction ceU, and antiadamantane antibodies conjugated to alkaline phosphatase are added. This leads to a microparticle-oUgonucleotide-enzyme complex which is captured by the glass fiber capture matrix. After the removal of excess reagent in a wash step (throughout this protocol, the blotter beneath the glass fiber capture matrix absorbs reagent solutions which would otherwise overflow the glass fiber capture matrix), the glass-fiber capture matrix is treated with 4-methylumbeUif eryl phosphate (MUP). The surface-bound enzyme converts the nonfluorogenic MUP to 4-methylumbelUferone (MU), whose fluorescence can be measured. The numerical IMx rate values given in the foUowing examples represent the rate of formation of fluorescent product, expressed in counts/sec/sec (c/s/s). The amount of Ugated probe is directly related to this rate. It should be noted that the IMx® instrument typicaUy generates "machine" noise or background in the range of 2- 12 c/s/s. In the iUustrative examples which foUow, probe pairs are labeled with a fluorescein hapten and a biotin hapten or with a carbazole hapten and an adamantaneacetic acid (adamantane) hapten. Typically, fluorescein and biotin are used together and adamantane and carbazole are used together in accordance with the description above although any combination of virtuaUy any haptens would be possible. Preferably, each member of a probe pair has a different label. Other equaUy suitable methods of detection useful in the practice of the present invention include ELISA, EIA, immunochromatography, and nucleic acid hybridization techniques including southern blotting, dot blotting, slot blotting, solution hybridization and others well known in the art. Quantities of polymerase are expressed in units, defined as foUows: 1 unit of enzyme equals the amount of enzyme required to incorporate 10 nanomoles total nucleotides into acid-insoluble material in 30 min at 70°C. Units of ligase enzyme are defined herein as: 1 mg of 95% purified Thermits thermophilus DNA Ugase has a specific activity of about 1 x 10* units. While this is not precisely standardized and may vary by as much as 20%, optimization is within the skiU of the routine practitioner. For purposes of this invention, the target sequence is described to be single stranded. However, this should be understood to include the case where the target is actuaUy double stranded but is simply separated from its complement prior to hybridization with the probes. In the case of double stranded target, the third and fourth ■ (secondary) probes, A' and B\ respectively, wiU participate in the initial step by . hybridizing to the target complement. In the case of single stranded target, they wiU not participate in the initial hybridization step, but wiU participate in subsequent hybridization steps, combining with the primary fused sequence produced by ligating the first and second probes. Target sequences may comprise deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or ribonucleic acid (RNA), although the targets shown and claimed herein are DNA. Also for the purposes of the present invention deoxynucleotide triphosphates include: deoxyadenosine triphosphate; deoxythymidine triphosphate; deoxyguanosine triphosphate; and deoxycytosine triphosphate. However, this is not meant to exclude modified bases or nontraditional bases that are analogs of these four if they can form hydrogen bonds in an analogous manner. The invention will now be described further by way of examples which are Ulustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit it in any way. For example, sequences of specific length are listed It should be understood that sequences covering the same map positions but having slightly fewer or greater numbers of bases are deemed to be equivalents of these sequences and faU within the scope of the invention, provided they wiU hybridize to the same positions on the target as the listed sequences. It is also understood that sequences having homology to the target sequences of about 80% or more also faU within the scope of the present invention. Preferably any base substitutions in the LCR sequences of the present invention Ue 3 or more nucleotides away from the gaps or recesses. Because Chlamydia is an obUgate intraceUular parasite, it is difficult to quantify control dilutions with accuracy. Although one elementary body (EB) and one inclusion forming unit (IFU) are theoreticaUy equivalent to one organism, this equaUty is rarely the case in practice. When non-viable organisms are present in the same EB or IFU, the count of actual organisms is inaccurate. Control solution IFUs are estimated by their IMx rate using a standard curve calibrated against stock solutions cultured out to estimate EBs or IFUs. Example 1: Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Using Probe Set 1 (SEQ ID NOS. 2-5) OUgonucleotide probes were chosen to detect a target sequence corresponding to nucleotides 435-482 of the MOMP gene (SEQ ID NO. 1) of Chlamydia trachomatis. (Figure 1). Probe set 1 (SEQ ID NOS. 2-5) was tested against panel of organisms consisting of a wide variety of Chlamydia trachomatis serovars (serological variants), for its abiUty to detect target DNA from these organisms. LCR reaction mixtures contained LCR buffer (50 mM EPPS, 30 mM MgCl2, 20 mM K+ [from KOH and KC1], 10 μM NAD), 1.7 μM dATP, 1.7 μM dCTP (gap-filUng nucleotides) 8 x 10 11 molecules of each oUgonucleotide probe labeled with carbazole and adamantane as described above, 5 μgtml acetylated bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.02% by weight sodium azide, 2 units Thermits sp. DNA polymerase (Molecular Biology Resources, Milwaukee, WI) 18,000 units Thermus thermophilus DNA ligase (Abbott Laboratories), and target DNA (equivalent to 10 elementary bodies of Chlamydia trachomatis), aU in a total volume of 200 μl. CycUng was then performed on a Perkin-Elmer Model 480 thermocycler at the following settings: 97 * C, 1 sec; 55 * C, 1 sec; 62 'C, 50 sec; for a total of 40 cycles. Target DNA may be prepared by a variety of methods weU known in the art In the present example, target DNA was prepared by heating the organism (grown in McCoy cells) at 85 "C-95 °C for 10 minutes in a buffer consisting of 5 mM EPPS, 60 mM MgCl 2 . FoUowing ampUfication, Ugation products were detected using a sandwich immunoassay using an Abbott automated IMx® Analyzer as described above. Table 1 shows the results of the assay expressed as counts/sec/sec (c/s/s). TABLE 1 Target DNA IMx® Rate fc sΛrt C. trachomatis serovar A 1370 B 1076 Ba 495 C 487 D 1022 E 575 F 1140 G 527 H 458 I 640 J 724 K 1058 LI 930 L2 1309 L3 1077 Negative Control 14 (330 ng salmon sperm DNA) These results show that probe set 1 (SEQ ID NOS 2-5) was capable of detecting target DNA from 15 different serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis. Example 2: Detection of Target DNA from Microbial Sources Using Probe Set 1 (SEQ ID NOS. 2-5) Probe set 1 (SEQ ID NOS.2-5) (Figure 1) was used in LCR assays against a panel of target DNAs derived from several microbial sources. LCR was performed as described in Example 1 except that target DNA was extracted from the bacterial sources and was present in the reactions at about l(fi copies per reaction. Probes were labeled with carbazole and adamantane as shown in Figure 1 as described above, and were • provided at 7 x 10 11 molecules/200 μL reaction. The analysis was carried out in several runs on the IMx® instrument and the positive control (PC) and negative control (NC) values for each run are provided. The positive control in each run was estimated to be 5.0 IFUs of Chlamydia ; the negative control was 330 ng salmon sperm DNA. Table 2 shows the results of the assays. 14 Table 2 Kim ar ?t Organism TMx® Rate fc/s/s PC & NC Values A Neisseria sicca 162 A N.flavescens 16 A N.perflava 63 PC 1265 A N. subflava 208 NC 12 A N.flava 20 A N. catarrhalis 15 B N. mucosa 76 B N. cinerea 15 B N. polysacchareae 82 PC 1254 B N. elongata 34 NC 12 B N. lactamica 51 C N. gonorrhoeae 16 C N. meningitidis 84 C Morganella morganii 89 PC 1252 C Escherichia coli 15 NC 66 C Pseudomonas aeruginosa 15 D Enter obacter aero genes 15 D Acinetobacter calcoaceticus 16 D Corynebacterium hqffmanni 26 PC 1283 D Yersinia enterocolitica 14 NC 12 D Alcaligenes faecalis 115 D Proteus vulgaris 15 E Staphylococcus aureus 17 E Serratia marcescens 36 PC 1338 E Staphylococcus epidermidis 64 NC 16 E Bacillus subtilis 16 F Klebsiella pneumoniae 34 F Salmonella enteritidis 87 F Providencia stuartii 15 PC 1112 F Enterόbacter cloacae 51 NC 14 F Shigella sonnei 15 F Mima pόtymorpha 63 G Hemophilus iηfluenzae 16 G Herella vagincola 156 G Streptococcus pyogenes 24 PC 1266 G Streptococcus faecalis 15 NC 13 G Lactobacillus plantarum 98 H Salmonella minnesota 16 H Hemophilus parainfluenzae 49 PC 1238 H Aeromonas hydrophila 16 NC 13 H Corynebacterium sp. 14 I Veillonella sp. 110 I • Moraxella osloensis 189 PC 1226 I Trichomonas vaginalis 57 NC 14 I Gardnerella vaginalis 34 The results show that probe set 1 gave relatively Uttle detectable signal when tested with target DNA from a variety of microbial sources using LCR, when compared with the signal generated with DNA from Chlamydia trachomati . Although signal from some bacterial species was greater than background, none were even 1/6 the signal from the Chlamydia positive control. Example 3: Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis With Probe Set 4 (SEQ ID NOS. 17-20) Probe set 4 (SEQ ID NOS. 17, 18, 19, and 20) (Figure 2) was used to detect a target DNA corresponding to oligonucleotides 6917-6964 (SEQ ID NO. 16) of the Chlamydia trachomatis cryptic plasmid described above. (Figure 2) Reactions were performed as described in Example 1 except that the gap-filling nucleotides were dCTP and dTTP, 1.2 units of Thermus sp DNA polymerase was used and 10,800 units of Thermus thermophilus DNA Ugase was used. Probes were provided at 6.2 x 10 11 molecules/ 200 μL reaction and cycUng was performed at 97 β C for 1 sec, 55 β C for 1 sec, and 62 β C for 50 sec., for a total of 40 cycles. Ligation products were analyzed on an automated IMx® analyzer as described in Example 1 and results are shown in Table 3. TABLE 3 Target DNA IMx® rate c/s/s'. C. trachomatis serovar A 988 B 871 Ba 715 C 721 D 713 E 649 F 747 G 673 H 513 I 601 J 698 K 692 LI 693 L2 801 L3 839 Negative Control 13 (330 ng salmon sperm i DNA) These results show that probe set 4 (SEQ ID NOS. 17, 18, 19, and 20) was capable of detecting target DNA from aU 15 of the Chlamydia trachomatis serovars tested. Example 4: Detection of Target DNA from Intact Microorganisms Using Probe Set 4 (SEQ ID NOS. 17-20) In order to assess the specificity of probe set 4 (SEQ ID NOS. 17-20) (Figure 2), LCR was performed using a wide variety of intact microorganisms including various bacteria, fungi, and viruses as weU as strains of Chlamydia pneumoniae and Chlamydia psittaci. LCR was performed as described in Example 3 except that 2 units of Thermus sp DNA polymerase and 18,000 units of Thermus thermophilus DNA Ugase were used The analysis was carried out in several runs on the IMx® instrument and the probe concentrations and positive control (PC) and negative control (NC) values for each run are provided in Table 5, below. Results are shown in Tables 4 (microorganisms) and 4A {Chlamydia species). TABLE 4 Target (Quantity) Run Bacterial species (organisms reaction ' .: IMx® (c/s/s'. b Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (1.2 x 10?) 11 m Actinomyces israelii (9.2 x 10 7 ) 11 b Aeromonas hydrophila (1.0 x 10 8 ) 10 b Alcaligenes faecalis (5.0 x 10 7 ) 13 b Bacillus subtilis (6.0 x 10 7 ) 10 b Bacillus thuringiensis (3.0 x 10 7 ) 10 b Bacteroidesfragilis (2.0 x 10 7 ) 10 b Bifidobacterium longum (1.5 x 10 7 ) 9 a Branhamella catarrhalis (1.8 x 10 8 ) 12 c Citrobacterfreundii (3.1 x 10 8 ) 14 m Clostridium sporogenes {1.8 x l0 7 ) 24 c Corynebacterium renale (2.0 x 10 8 ) 10 c Edwardsiella tarda (1.4 x 10 8 ) 10 c Enterobacter cloacae (3.0 x lO 7 ) 13 c Enterobacter aerogenes (\.8 x l0 8 ) 23 d Enterococcus faecalis (6.0 x 10 7 ) 12 d Enterococcus faecium (2.6 x 10 8 ) 13 d Escherichia coli (8.0 x 10 7 ) 19 d Ewingella americana (1.0 x lO 8 ) 23 d Flavobacterium odoratum (1.0 x 10 8 ) 12 d Fusobacterium nucleatum (2.0 x lO 8 ) 12 d Gardnerella vaginalis (2.0 x 10 7 ) 24 d Hafnia alvei (6.0 x 10 8 ) 17 n Helicobacter pylori (1.0 W5) 11 e Hemophilus influenzae (3.0 x 10 7 ) 15 1 Hemophilus ducreyi (3.0 x 10 6 ) 11 e Klebsiella pneumoniae (7.0 x lO 7 ) 11 e Lactobacillus casei (1.0 x 10 8 ) 9 e Morganella morganii (3.0 x 10 7 ) 12 1 Moraxella lacunata (3.4 x 10 7 ) 11 1 Mycobacterium tuberculosis RaH37 (1.0 x 10 7 ) 27 a Mycobacterium avium (4.0 x 10^) 10 a Mycobacterium gordonae (5.0 x 10 8 ) 11 e Neisseria gonorrheae (4.0 x 10 7 ) 11 e Neisseria lactamica (3.0 x 10 7 ) 16 e Neisseria meningitidis (2.0 x 10 7 ) 10 e Neisseria sicca (2.0 x 10 7 ) 10 f Pasteurella multocida (1.0 x 10 8 ) 18 f Peptostrept. asaccharolyticus (2.0 x 10 7 ) 14 f Pleisiomonas shigelloides (7.0 x 10 7 ) 16 f Proteus mirabilis (4.0 x 10 7 ) 17 f Proteus vulgaris (3.0 x 10%) 17 f Propiombacterium acnes (2.0 x 10 7 ) 11 f Provide cia stuartii (2.8 x 10 8 ) 10 f Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.0 x 10 8 ) 15 g Salmonella enteritidis (2.7 x 10 8 ) 22 g Salmonella minnesota (7-0 x 10 7 ) 20 g Salmonella typhimurium (4.0 x 10 7 ) 19 g Shigella sonnei (2.0 x 10 8 ) 23 0 Staphylococcus aureus ATCC6358 (1.0 x 10 7 ) 127 g Staphylococcus epidermidis (2.5 x 10 8 ) 14 1 Streptococcus agalactiae (1.2 x 10 7 ) 10 g Streptococcus mitis (1.3 x 10°) 12 h Streptococcus mutans (1.1 x 10 8 ) 10 h Streptococcus pneumoniae (6.0 x 10 7 ) 9 h Streptococcus pyogenes (9.0 x 10 7 ) 21 1 Streptomyces griseus (5.1 x 10 7 ) 14 h Veillonella caviae (3.0 x 10 7 ) 10 h Vibrio parahemolyticus (5.7 x 10 8 ) 10 h Yersinia enterocoliticus (4.0 x 10 8 ) 23 Yeast and Fungi species: 1 Blastomyces dermatidis (DNA, 0.5 ug) 10 b Candida albicans (9.0 x 10 7 ) 9 c Candida albicans (4.0 x 10 7 ) 10 c Cryptococcus laurentii (7.0 x 10 7 ) 4 1 Cryptococcus neoformans (DNA, 0.5 ug) 10 1 Histoplasma capsulatwn (D A, 0.5 ug) 18 g Saccharomyces cerevisiae (9.0 x 10 7 ) 13 Viruses: i Adenovirus (1.0 x 10 5 ) 11 k Cytomegalovirus l69 (1.0 x 10 5 ) 105 k Epstein-Barr virus ( 1.0 x 10 5 ) 10 k Hepatitis A & B virus (1.0 x 10 5 ) 90 i Herpes simplex virus 1 (1.0 x 10*5) . 12 i Herpes simplex virus II (1.0 x 10*5) 12 k Human herpes virus 6 (1.0 x 10*5) 10 i HIV provirus (1.0 x 10 5 ) 12 i Human papilloma virus 16 (1.0 x 10*^) 11 j Human papilloma virus 18 (1.0 x 10-5) 21 k Varicella zoster (1.0 x 10 5 ) 10 Parasites: i Treponema pallidum (DNA, 1.0 x 10 5 ) 11 TABLE 4A Run Target IMx® Rate (clsls) Result Chlamydia pneumoniae strains: P TWR 183 14 (-) P AR 39 10 (-) P AR388 9 (-) P CM 1 20 (-) P CWLOll 13 (-) q BAL 15 98 (-) q BAL 16 10 (-) q BAL 37 10 (-) q FM 16 16 (-) r VR 1310 14 (-) r VR 1356 (2023) 192 (-) r VR 1355 (2043) 95 (-) r 2364 13 (-) Chlamydia psittaci strains: p SM006 15 (-) P 6BC 12 (-) The probe concentrations used and the resulting positive control (PC) and negative control (NC) values for each run of Example 4 are given in Table 5. The positive control was estimated to be 5.0 IFUs of Chlamydia trachomatis and the negative control was 330 ng salmon sperm DNA in each run. TABLE 5 Run Probe Concentration PC Value NC Value a 6.0 x 10 11 molecules/reaction 1 7 04 10 b 6.0 x 10 11 1436 9 c 6.0 x lO 11 1514 9 d 6.0 x lO 11 1246 11 e 6.0 x 10 11 1024 9 f 6.0 x 10 1] 1166 9 g 6.0 x ion 1970 12 h 6.0 x lO 11 1323 9 i 6.0 x 10 1] 1401 10 j 6.0 x lO 11 1409 11 k 6.0 x lO 11 1223 9 1 4.6 x lO 11 1756 10 m 4.6 x io 1412 10 n 6.0 x 10 1 ] 1223 9 o 5.0 x l0 1] 1951 11 r 5.0 x 10 1 I « 1888 10 These results show that probe set 4 (SEQ ID NOS. 17, 18, 19, and 20) produced Ugation products only when Chlamydia trachomatis was present in the LCR reaction mixture and not when a wide variety of other microorganisms were present including closely related Chlamydia pneumoniae and Chlamydia psittaci strains. Example 5: Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis With Probe Set 5 (SEQ ID NOS. 22-25) Probe set 5 (SEQ ID NOS.22-25) (Figure 2) was used to detect a target DNA corresponding to nucleotides 6107-6160 (SEQ ID NO.21) (Figure 2) of the Chlamydia trachomatis cryptic plasmid described above. Reactions were conducted as described in Example 1 also using gap-filUng nucleotides dATP and dCTP, but not acetylated BSA. Cycling was performed at 97 β C for 1 sec, 58 β C for 1 sec, and 65 * C for 20 sees, for a total of 37 cycles. Probes were labeled with biotin and fluorescein as described above, and provided at 2 x 10 12 molecules 200 μL reaction. Ligation products were analyzed on an IMx® analyzer as shown in Figure 2 and as described above. Results are shown in Table 6. TABLE 6 T Taarrggeett PDrN» A IMx® Rate (c/s/s C. trachomatis serovar A 916 B 864 Ba 833 C 894 D 741 E 557 F 796 G 909 H 697 I 598 J 870 K 772 LI 1211 L2 1387 L3 1390 Negative Control 86 (330 ng Human Placenta! DNA) These results show that probe set 5 (SEQ ID NOS. 22-25) is capable of detecting 15 different serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis. Example 6: Detection of Target DNA from Microbial Sources Using Probe Set 5 (SEQ ID NOS. 22-25) The specificity of probe set 5 was assessed using target DNA from a series of non- chlamydial microorganisms. LCR was performed as described in Example 5 in four runs except that target DNA was present at about 10^ genomes reaction. Positive Control (PC) was estimated to be 5.0 IFUs and Negative Control (NC) was 330 ng human placental DNA in each run. The PC and NC values for each run are shown in Table 7. IMx® analysis was performed as described above. Table 7 also shows the results of these assays. TABLE 7 Run Organism IMx® Rate (c/s/sϊ PC & NC Values A Lactobacϊllus 16 A Hemophilus ducreyi 21 PC 2148 A Fusobacteήum 43 NC 11 A Yersinia 10 A Corvnebacterium 18 B Hemophilus influenzae 28 B Bacillus fragilis 21 B Candida albicans 23 PC 2228 B Klebsiella pneumoniae 29 NC 22 B Gardnerella vaginalis 26 B Staphylococcus epidermidis 42 C Acinetobacter 28 C Streptococcus faecalis 9 C Pseudomonas 20 PC 2018 C Proteus vulgaris 10 NC 17 C Chlamydia psittaci 11 C Escherichia coli 9 c Neisseria gonorrhoeas 14 D Neisseria meningitidis 11 PC 2120 NC 21 These results indicate that probe set 5 (SEQ ID NOS.22-25) shows no cross reactivity with target DNA derived from a variety of non-chlamydial microorganisms or from ' Chlamydia psittici. Example 7: Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Target DNA Using Probe Set 2 (SEQ ID NOS. 7-10) Probe set 2 (SEQ ID NOS.7-10) was used to detect target DNA corresponding to nucleotides 788-835 (SEQ ID NO. 6) of the MOMP gene of Chlamydia trachomatis. (Figure 1). Probes were synthesized and labeled as shown in Figure 1 and described above, and were provided at 2 x 10 12 molecules 200 μL reaction. LCR assays were performed as described in Example 1 using dATP and dCTP as gap filling nucleotides. Table 8 shows the results of the assays. Table 8 Target DNA C. trachomatis Serovar IMx® Rate fc/s/s A 11 B 32 Ba 21 C 24 D 182 E 11 F 232 G 83 H 26 I 9 J 11 K 44 LI 220 L2 218 L3 9 Negative Control 30 (330 nε human r>la icental DNA') These results show that probe set 2 yielded relatively low IMx® rates in most serovars tested. The best results were obtained for serovars D, F, LI, and L2. Example 8: Detection of Non-Chlamydia Target DNA Using Probe Set 2 (SEQ ID NOS. 7-10) Probe set 2 was used at 2 x 10 12 molecules/ 200 μL reaction in LCR assays using target DNAs from a variety of non-chlamydial microorganisms. LCR was performed as described in Example 7 except that target DNA was present at about 10 8 genomes per reaction. Positive Control (PC) was estimated to be 5.0 IFUs and Negative Control (NC) was 330 ng human placental DNA in each run. Results of these assays are shown in Table 9. Table 9 EM Organism TMx® Rate (c/s/s PC &NC Values a Neisseria sicca 15 a Neisseria flavescens 12 a Neisseria perflava 11 PC 687 a Neisseria subflava 11 NC 14 a Neisseria flava 10 a. Neisseria catarrhalis 10 b Neisseria mucosa 11 b Neisseria cinerea 11 b Neisseria polysacchareae 11 PC 640 b Neisseria elongata 11 NC 13 b Neisseria lactamica ii c Neisseria meningitidis 13 c Neisseria gonorrhoeas 17 c Moraxella morganii 12 PC 675 c Escherichia coli 11 NC 15 c Pseudomona aeruginnsa 11 d Enterobacter aerogenes 13 d Acinetobacter calcoaceticus 12 d Yersinia enterocoliticus 10 PC 680 d Alcaligenes faecalis 10 NC 13 d Proteus vulgaris 10 These results show that probe set 2 did not produce detectable Ugation products when DNA from a variety of non-chlamydial bacteria were used as target DNA. Example 9: Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Using Probe Set 3 (SEQ ID NOS. 12-15) Probe set 3 (SEQ ID NOS. 12-15) was assessed for its abiUty to detect target DNA corresponding to nucleotides 1501-1506 of the MOMP gene in a variety of serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis. (Figure 1). LCR was performed as described in Example 1 (using dATP and dCTP as fiUing nucleotides) except that cycling was performed as foUows: 97 β C, 1 sec; 58°C, 1 sec; 65°C, 10 sec; for a total of 37 cycles. Probes were used at 2 x lO 12 molecules/ 200 μL reaction. Results are shown in Table 10. Table 10 Target DNA C. trachomatis Serovar IMx® Rate (c/s/s". A 32 B 317 Ba 209 C 54 D 360 E 141 F 190 G 272 H 122 I 10 J 336 K 27 LI 290 L2 356 L3 286 Negative Control 11 (330 ng human plac :ent I DNA * ) The results show that probe set 3 (SEQ ID NOS. 12-15) was capable of detecting target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis serovars B, Ba, D, E, F, G, H, J, LI, L2 and L3, while target DNA from serovars A, C, I and K yielded Uttle signal. The forgoing examples are presented by way of iUustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. For example, sequences of specific length are listed It should be understood that sequences covering the same map positions but having fewer or greater numbers of nucleotides are deemed to be equivalents of these sequences and fall within the scope of the invention, provided they wUl hybridize to the same positions on the target as the Usted sequences. SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INFORMATION: (i) APPLICANT: Burczak, John Carrino, J.J. Salituro, J.A. Pabich, E.K. Klonowski, P.A. Manlove, M.T. Marshall, R.L. (ii) TITLE OF INVENTION: Materials and Methods for the Detection of Chlamydia Trachomatis (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 25 (iv) CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: (A) ADDRESSEE: ABBOTT LABORATORIES (B) STREET: One Abbott Park Road (C) CITY: Abbott Park (D) STATE: Illinois (E) COUNTRY: USA (F) ZIP: 60064-3500 (v) COMPUTER READABLE FORM: (A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk (B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS (D) SOFTWARE: WordPerfect (vi) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA: ■ (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: (B) FILING DATE: (C) CLASSIFICATION: (viii) ATTORNEY/AGENT INFORMATION: (A) NAME: Brainard, Thomas D. (B) REGISTRATION NUMBER: 32,459 (C) REFERENCE/DOCKET NUMBER: 5372.US.01 (ix) TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION: (A) TELEPHONE: 708 937-4884 (B) TELEFAX: 708 938-2623 (C) TELEX: (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:l: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 48 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Chlamydia trachomatis (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:l: GCTTTGAGTT CTGCTTCCTC CTTGCAAGCT CTGCCTGTGG GGAATCCT 48 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 24 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2: GCTTTGAGTT CTGCTTCCTC CTTG 24 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:3: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 21 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:3: GGAGGAAGCA GAACTCAAAG C 21 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:4: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 21 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:4: GCTCTGCCTG TGGGGAATCC T 21 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:5: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 24 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:5: AGGATTGCCC ACAGGCAGAG CTTG 24 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:6: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 48 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Chlamydia trachomatis (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 6: TTGGGATCGT TTTGATGTAT TCTGTACATT AGGAGCCACC AGTGGATA 48 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:7: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 25 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:7: TTGGGATCGT TTTGATGTAT TCTGT 25 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:8: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 22 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:8: GAATACATCA AAACGATCCC AA 22 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:9: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 20 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:9: TTAGGAGCCA CCAGTGGATA 20 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:10: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: * (A) LENGTH: 23 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:10: TATCCACTGG TGGCTCCTAA TGT 23 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:11: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 46 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Chlamydia trachomatis (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:11: TGGATGCAGA CAAATACGCA GTTACAGTTG AGACTCGCTT GATCGA 46 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:12: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 23 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:12: TGGATGCAGA CAAATACGCA GTT 23 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:13: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 20 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:13: TGCGTATTTG TCTGCATCCA 20 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:14: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 20 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:14: GTTGAGACTC GCTTGATCGA 20 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:15: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 23 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:15: TCGATCAAGC GAGTCTCAAC TGT 23 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:16: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 48 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (extrachromosomal) (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Chlamydia trachomatis (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:16: GACTTTGCAA CTCTTGGTGG TAGACTTGGT CATAATGGAC TTTTGTTG 48 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:17: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 24 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:17: GACTTTGCAA CTCTTGGTGG TAGA 24 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:18: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 21 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:18: ACCACCAAGA GTTGCAAAGT C 21 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:19: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 21 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:19: GGTCATAATG GACTTTTGTT G 21 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:20: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 24 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:20: CAACAAAAGT CCATTATGAC CAAG 24 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:21: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 54 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (extrachromosomal) (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Chlamydia trachomatis (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:21: ATTTTAAGAA GACGCTTCCT TCCATTGAAC TATTCTCAGC AACTTTGAAT TCTG 54 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:22: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 27 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:22: ATTTTAAGAA GACGCTTCCT TCCATTG 27 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:23: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 24 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:23: TGGAAGGAAG CGTCTTCTTA AAAT 24 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:24: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 24 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: circular (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:24: TATTCTCAGC AACTTTGAAT TCTG 24 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:25: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 27 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (synthetic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:25: CAGAATTCAA AGTTGCTGAG AATAGTT 27

Claims: We Claim: 1. A composition for detecting target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis, said composition comprising a set of four oUgonucleotide probes, said set selected from the group consisting of probe set 1 (SEQ ID NOS.2-5), probe set 2 (SEQ ID NOS. 7-10), probe set 3 (SEQ ID NOS. 12-15), probe set 4 (SEQ ID NOS. 17-20), and probe set 5 (SEQ ID NOS. 22-25) as defined herein, and combinations thereof. 2. A composition according to claim 1, said composition selected from the group consisting of probe set 1 (SEQ ID NOS.2-5). 3. A composition according to claim 1, said composition selected from the group consisting of probe set 4 (SEQ ID NOS. 17-20). 4. A composition according to claim 1, said composition selected from the group consisting of probe set 5 (SEQ ID NOS. 22-25). 5. A composition according to claim 1, wherein at least one probe from the set bears a reporter group. 6. A method for detecting the presence of target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis in a sample, said method utilizing a ligase chain reaction comprising the steps of: a) mixing together a sample suspected of containing said target DNA, and at least one probe set according to claim 1 ; b) providing one or more, but less than all four deoxynucleotide triphosphates, a polymerase, and a ligase; c) denaturing said mixture of sample and probe set to separate double stranded DNA; d) hybridizing said probe set to said denatured DNA thereby creating hybridized probes having a gap between each probe of each probe pair, e) correcting said hybridized probes in a template-dependent manner thereby creating adjacent and Ugatable probes; f) Ugating said adjacent probes to form reorganized probes; g) repeating steps b) through f) at least once; and h) determining the extent of formation of reorganized probes as a measure of the presence of target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis. 7. The method according to claim 6 wherein steps b) through f) are repeated from about 10 to about 50 times. 8. The method according to claim 6 wherein said Ugase is a thermostable Ugase. 9. The method according to claim 6 wherein said polymerase is a DNA polymerase. 10. The method according to claim 8 wherein said DNA polymerase is thermostable. 11. The method according to claim 6 wherein at least one probe in said probe set is labeled with a hapten, and said method further comprises detecting said label using an immunoassay format. 12. The method according to claim 6 wherein said probe set consists essentially of probe set 1 (SEQ ID NOS. 2-5). 13. The method according to claim 6 wherein said probe set consists essentially of probe set 4 (SEQ ID NOS. 17-20). 14. The method according to claim 6 wherein said probe set consists essentially of probe set 6 (SEQ ID NOS. 22-25). 15. A kit useful in detecting target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis, said kit comprising one or more suitable containers containing: a) at least one set of four oUgonucleotide probes wherein said probe set is selected from the group consisting of probe set 1 (SEQ ID NOS.2-5), probe set 2 (SEQ ID NOS. 7-10), probe set 3 (SEQ ID NOS. 12-15), probe set 4 (SEQ ID NOS. 17-20), and probe set 5 (SEQ ID NOS. 22-25); b) a polymerase reagent; c) one or more but less than all four deoxynucleotide triphosphates; and d) a ligase reagent. 16. The kit according to claim 15 wherein at least one probe of said probe set has a label capable of detection. 17. The kit according to claim 15 wherein said polymerase reagent is a thermostable DNA polymerase and said ligase is a thermostable Ugase. 18. An oUgonucleotide probe useful in the detection of target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis, said probe characterized in that it is from 10 to about 50 nucleotides long and possesses sufficient complementarity or homology to the sequences shown in SEQ ID NOS. 1, 6, 11, 16 or 21 to hybridize with such sequence or its complement under hybridizing conditions, and in that it detects at least two Chlamydia trachomatis serovars while not cross reacting substantially with other organisms. 19. An oUgonucleotide probe according to claim 18 wherein said probe is selected from the group consisting of probes designated herein as SEQ ID NO. 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24 and 25. 20. An oUgonucleotide probe according to claim 18 further characterized in that it bears a label to facilitate detection. 21. A method for detecting the presence of target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis in a sample, the method comprising the steps of: a) providing a sample suspected of containing said target DNA; b) hybridizing an oUgonucleotide according to claim 18 to said target DNA in said sample, said oUgonucleotide being conjugated to a label, said label capable of generating a detectable signal; c) determining the presence of said target DNA by detecting the signal generated. 22. The method according to claim 21 further comprising at least one amplifying step subsequent to said hybridizing step. 23. The method according to claim 22 wherein said ampUfying step is a ligase chain reaction. 24. A composition for detecting target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis, said composition comprising a pair of oUgonucleotide probes, said pair being selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOS. 2 and 4, SEQ ID NOS. 3 and 5, SEQ ID NOS. 7 and 9, SEQ ID NOS. 8 and 10, SEQ ID NOS. 12 and 14, SEQ ID NOS. 13 and 15, SEQ ID NOS. 18 and 19, SEQ ID NOS. 18 and 20, SEQ ID NOS. 22 and 24, and SEQ ID NOS. 23 and 25. 25. A composition according to claim 24, said composition selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOS. 2 and 4 or SEQ ID NOS. 3 and 5. 26. A composition according to claim 24, said composition selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOS. 18 and 19 or SEQ ID NOS. 18 and 20. 27. A composition according to claim 24, said composition selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOS. 22 and 24 or SEQ ID NOS. 23 and 25. 28. A method for detecting the presence of target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis in a sample, said method comprising the steps of: a) mixing together a sample suspected of containing said target DNA, and at least one probe pair according to claim 24; b) providing one or more, but less than all four deoxynucleotide triphosphates, a polymerase, and a ligase; c) denaturing said mixture of sample and probe set to separate double stranded DNA; d) hybridizing said probe set to said denatured DNA thereby creating hybridized probes having a gap between each probe of each probe pair, e) correcting said hybridized probes in a template-dependent manner thereby creating adjacent and Ugatable probes; f) Ugating said adjacent probes to form reorganized probes; and g) determining the extent of formation of reorganized probes as a measure of the presence of target DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis. 29. The method according to claim 28 wherein at least one probe in said probe pair is labeled with a hapten, and said method further comprises detecting said label using an immunoassay format. 30. The method according to claim 28 wherein steps b) through f) are repeated at least once to effect a Unear amplification of target DNA.

Inventors: BURCZAK JOHN D, CARRINO JOHN J, KLONOWSKI PAUL A, MANLOVE MATTHEW T, MARSHALL RONALD L, PABICH EDWARD K, SALITURO JOHN A, BURCZAK, JOHN, D., CARRINO, JOHN, J., KLONOWSKI, PAUL, A., MANLOVE, MATTHEW, T., MARSHALL, RONALD, L., PABICH, EDWARD, K., SALITURO, JOHN, A.
Applicants: ABBOTT LAB, ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Application year: 1994
Main classification: C12Q1
IPC codes: C07H21, C12N15, C12Q1, G01N33