AN EXTRACT OF FRESHWATER MUSSEL, METHODS OF THE EXTRACTION AND USES THEREOF

Abstract: The present invention relates to an extract of freshwater mussel which is useful as analgesics and/or medicines for inhibition of tumor, especially treatment of cancer, and to methods of the extraction thereof.

Description: The present invention relates to an extract of clam (Lea), its preparation method and medical applications, and a pharmaceutical composition containing the extract and the preparation method thereof. For a long time, anodyne has been applied to relieve acute pains caused by cancer. The potent anodynes including, for example, dolantin and morphine are commonly used. Because of their side-effects such as leading to addiction etc., people have been trying to develop a new anodyne, which has strong and long-lasting pain-relieving effect but without side-effects such as leading to addiction. The applicant, after long and careful researches, has developed a potent painkiller which can help patients, especially cancer patients of serious stages, relieve pains without the toxic side-effect, and no addiction has been observed. The applicant has further found that such analgesic can not only relieve pains, but also inhibit the growth of tumors. One object of the present invention is to provide an extract of clam, which has the effect of relieving pains on patients, particularly easing pains caused by cancer. Another object of the present invention is to provide a method of preparing the clam extract. One further object of the present invention is to provide a pharmaceutical composition containing the clam extract for relieving pains. Another object of the present invention is to provide an extract of clam with the effect of inhibiting the growth of tumor. Other objects of the present invention may be better understood from the description of the invention. The clam extract of the invention made from clam (Lea) meat is in solid state under normal temperature and pressure and in light yellowish, yellow or light brown color, which slightly dissolves in water or low density ethanol but hardly dissolves in organic solvents, such as ether, acetone, chloroform, benzene, acetic ester or n-butanol, etc., and has characteristic absorption between 250nm to 278nm shown by the ultraviolet absorption spectrum. According to the present invention, a method of preparing a clam extract comprises the following steps: grinding clam meat; treating the grounded clam meat with acid and alcohol; separating the acid-and-alcohol treated substances to give a clear liquid; concentrating the clear liquid to give a clam extract, or treating the clear liquid with alkali to give, by separation, a precipitate which is a clam extract. In the preparation, clam meat may be selected from various freshwater clams, and the preferred clam is Anodonta woodiana Lea, Cristaria plicata Lea, Hyriopsis cumingii Lea or a mixture thereof, including mixtures of two or three kinds of clams. Since the sources of clam are different, clam meat is washed with water before grinding to remove dirt or impurities, when necessary. Common grinding equipments, such as meat chopper or grinder, may be used to grind clam meat. In order to grind clam meat into a desired size, colloidal mill may also be used to re-grind the ground meat, or be directly applied to pulverize the clam meat. The smaller size of the ground clam meat is favorable to increase the output rate of extract from clam. Preferably, average size of the ground clam meat is less than 1 mm. For the step of treatment with acid and alcohol, the used acid is C 2 -C 8 fatty acid with straight chain or branched chain, preferably is C 2 -C 6 fatty acid with straight chain or branched chain, such as acetic acid, citric acid or hydrochloric acid. The mixture of two or more than two kinds of acids may also be applied for the treatment . In the acid mixture, the proportion among the acids is optional. During the treatment with acid and alcohol, pH value shall be controlled at about 2 to 5.5. And the treatment with acid and alcohol is normally conducted under the normal temperature. The mixture is stirred during or after the addition of acid and alcohol, and the stirring may be ended when the mixture becomes homogeneous one. The treatment with acid and alcohol is normally carried out for 1 to 24 hours, preferably 5 to 12 hours. However, the next step can also be immediately begun after the sufficient acid is added. In the treatment with acid and alcohol step, an adequate amount of ethanol is added. Alcohol may be added together with acid, or may also be added after acid is added. After the addition of ethanol, the density of alcohol shall be 40% to 75% of the acid treated materials. The mixture treated with acid and alcohol is separated so as to obtain clear liquid. There are many separation methods, and the typical examples include centrifugal separation, filtering, suction filtering and filter pressing. The clear liquid obtained after separation can be concentrated in many ways, such as ultra-filtering, reverse osmosis and vacuum concentration, ect. In accordance with the present invention, clear liquid obtained after separation may be treated with alkali instead of the concentration step, for instance, using NaOH or KOH in the treatment. pH value of the mixture is maintained at 8 to 13 during the alkali treatment. The alkali treatment period is normally controlled within 24 hours. An additional amount of ethanol may also be added. Ethanol may be added together with alkali or after alkali is added. For the alkali treatment , the density of ethanol can be maintained at 75% to 90%. The precipitate separated after alkali treatment is clam extract. The separation methods are the same as those described above. According to the present invention, the extract of clam obtained after the concentration step, or extract of clam obtained after the alkali treatment step may undergo the step of dehydration and drying. The common dehydration and drying methods include: dehydration by reagent such as ether and acetone, etc., freeze drying dehydration and spray drying, ect. Additional acid may be added to the extract of clam obtained with the alkali treatment before the dehydrating and drying step to adjust the pH value of the clam extract, except for the dehydrating by reagent. The pH value normally ranges from 4 to 7, and the acid to be used is the same as that mentioned above. Clam extract prepared according to the method of the invention may be further purified by re-undergoing the above-mentioned acid treatment and the steps which follow the acid treatment. The process may be repeated many times, and the acid used may be same or different. Another preparation method of clam extract according to the present invention includes the following steps grinding clam meat; treating the ground clam meat with heat in the present of acid and water, wherein the pH value is 2-6 in the treating process. separating the heat-treated material to obtain clear liquid; concentrating the clear liquid to obtain clam extract. The size of ground clam and the grinding methods used are same as those mentioned above. During the heat treatment step, an adequate amount of water is added. The added acid shall make pH value of the material to be treated ranging from 2.0 to 6.0. The acid to be used is the same as that mentioned above. The temperature of heat treatment is normally maintained at 48 to 88 °C and the heating period is 0.5 to 4.5 hours. Clam extract obtained from the concentration may be further dehydrated and dried. The methods for separation, concentration and dehydration and drying are the same as those described above. The steps of the heat treatment method for the preparation of clam extract may be repeated in order to purify the clam extract. Brief Description of the Drawing Fig. 1 is the ultraviolet-visible light absorption spectrum of clam extract prepared according to the invention. Method to identify clam extract prepared according to the invention. 1g sample of clam extract prepared according to the invention was taken. Water was added to 50 ml. The mixture was filtered and then the filtrate was obtained for the following identification (1,2,3 and 4). 1.2 ml of the filtrate were added into a test tube. 3 to 4 drops of 5% of α-naphthol alcohol was added, and the mixture was shaken to be homogeneous, and then 1 ml of concentrated sulfuric acid was added slowly along the wall of the test tube. Purple rings appeared on the connection of the two liquid phases. 2. The filtrate in an appropriate amount was taken and the same volume of 3,5-dihydroxytoluene solution was added. The mixture was shaken to be homogeneous and heated in water bath for 10 minutes. Then green color appeared. 3.2 ml of the filtrate were added into a test tube, and drops of iron trichloride-potassium ferricyanide solution were added, and blue color appeared immediately. 4. 2 ml of the filtrate were added into a test tube, and barium hydroxide solution was added. Flock in light yellowish color appeared. 5. 1 g sample of the clam extract prepared according to the invention was put into a conical flask. 15 ml of 10% sulfuric acid solution was added. A small glass funnel was inserted into the mouth of the flask, and the mixture was heated for hydrolysis in boiling water bath for about half an hour. Then the mixture was filtered and the filtrate was taken for the following tests: (1) 1 ml of 0.1 N AgNO 3 solution was added into a test tube, then 1 N ammonia water was added gradually in drops until the precipitate disappeared. And then 1 ml of the above filtrate was added. The mixture was left to stand for a while, and white precipitate appeared in the sample prepared according to the invention, which becomes red-brown under light. (2) 2 ml of the filtrate was added into a test tube. After 5 drops of strong nitric acid and 1 ml of ammonium molybdate was added, yellow precipitate appeared in the sample when heated in the boiling water bath. (3) 1 ml of the filtrate was added into a test tube, and the same volume of 3,5-dihydoxy toluene solution was added. The sample became greenish when heated in the boiling water bath for 10 minutes. 6. Ultraviolet-visible light absorption characteristics: The sample extract prepared according to the invention in an appropriate amount was taken and dissolved in normal saline, and analysis was carried out according to the spectrophotometry (page 24 of the appendix to the second portion of Chinese Pharmacopoeia 1990 edition). The ultraviolet absorption spectrum is shown as in Fig. 1. It can be seen from the test results that the four batches of clam extract show the maximum absorption at 258 nm, 259 nm, 260 nm and 271 nm respectively. In view of the difference in size, sources and species of clams, their characteristic absorptions are in the range from 250 nm to 278 nm of ultraviolet absorption spectrum. The present invention also includes clam extracts prepared according to any one of the methods of the invention. Clam extracts of the invention can be used as analgesic to ease various pains in the medical field, such as pains after surgery, pains caused by rheumatic diseases, toothache, pains caused by injuries and burns, especially pains caused by serious stages of cancer, etc. The clam extracts of the invention have a longer pain-relieving effect than anodyne which are commonly used at present. At the same time, the clam extract of the invention can also ease the clinic symptoms of cancer patients in serious stage, prolong the life of the patients, and improve the joint positions of rheumatic patients. During clinic applications, no addiction to the clam extract has been found. The clam extract of the invention also have the effect on inhibiting the growth of tumor, and can be used to treat and cure various tumors, including cancer at the most serious stage, or can also be used together with other drugs to treat and cure cancer, particularly malignant tumors, as a supplementary drug. The clam extract of the invention can also be used as analgesic and tumor-inhibitor at the same time. The extract, while relieving pains of patients, can also inhibit the growth of tumors. Acute Toxicity Test I. Testing Materials 1. Animals: Wistar rat, each weighting 240-250 g with male and female each in half, provided by Animals Laboratory of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. 2. Specimen: the suppository prepared by the clam extract of'the present invention (0.15 g/pc). II. Testing Methods and Results 20 healthy Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups (i.e. test group and control group) based on the body weight, with 10 rats in each group and male and female each in half. Each Wistar rat in the test group was intrarectally administered 1.2g/kg of the specimen which contacted the mucous membrane for more than 4 hours. For the control group, one piece of excipient was administered according to the above rectal medication. Then the rats were observed for changes on their whole bodies, such as diet, activity of arms and legs, excretion, body weight, etc., for 7 successive days. The results are as the followings: Results of Acute Toxicity Test of the Clam Extract Group Number of animals Administration route Dosage (g/kg) Time (day) State of rats after administration Body weight Diet Activity of arms & legs Excretion Death Test 10 by Rectum 1.2 7 ↑ - - - 0 Control 10 by Rectum 1pc 7 ↑ - - - 0 Note: "↑" stands for increase, "-" stands for normal. III. Conclusion: No toxic reaction has been observed after the rats had intrarectally been administered with the specimen in the dosage of 1.2 g/kg. Irritating Test of Rectum I. Testing Materials 1. Animals: Wistar rats, each weighting 240-280 g with male and female each in half, provided by Animals Laboratory of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. 2. Specimen: the suppository prepared by the clam extract of the present invention (0,15g/pc). II.Testing Methods and Results 20 healthy Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups( i.e. test group and control group) based on the body weight, with 10 rats in each group and male and female each in half. Each Wistar rat in the test group was intrarectally administered 1.2g/kg of the specimen which contacted the mucous membrane for more than 4 hours. For the control group, water in equal quantity was administered according to the above rectal medication once a day for 7 successive days. Then the rats were killed after 24 hours from the last administration. The rectum tissue was taken and observed macroscopically whether symptoms such as congestion, rubifaction and tumefaction etc. appear in the mucous membrane. The results are shown in Table 2. Results of Irritating Test of Rectum Group Number of animals Administration route Dosage (pc) Time (day) State of rectal mucosa after dissection congestion rubifaction & tumefaction Test 10 by Rectum 1 7 - - Control 10 by Rectum 1 7 - - Note: "-" stands for negative reaction. III. Conclusion: It can be seen from Table 2 that no irritated symptoms such as congestion, rubifaction and tumefaction has been observed in the mucous membrane after the rats are intrarectally administered with I piece of suppository of the invention per rat for 7 successive days. Study on Analgesic Effects I. Purpose of the Test The purpose of the test is to observe effects of the suppository prepared by the clam extract of the invention on pains of mice caused by chemicl and electric irritation, and the time of initiation and duration of the effect. II. Testing Materials and Animals 1. Drugs: The clam extract of the invention was dissolved in 2 mol acetic acid and the pH value was adjusted to be 6.5~7.0. Then normal saline in an adequate amount was added. Indomethacin: produced by Nantong Second Pharmaceutical Factory, with the lot number of 860321, which was formulated into a suspension with 2% of water-soluble starch paste. 3. Instruments: An electric stimulator of Model NEN-7103, and an isolator of Model SS-102J, made in Japan. III. Testing Methods and Results 1. Effects on the Body Torsion Reaction of Mice Caused by Acetic Acid After fasting for 12 hours, 60 mice were randomly allotted into 6 groups based on their body weight and sex. The drug was intrarectally administered in the dosage indicated in Table 3 and the volume of drug administered was 0.05 ml per mouse. 35 minutes later, 0.20 ml of 0.6% acetic acid was intraperitoneally injected to each mouse. The number of body torsion reactions (abdominal excavation, extension of trunk and hind limbs, and elevation of buttock) observed within 15 minutes after the injection of acetic acid was recorded. Effects of Intrarectally Administered Suppository of the Invention on Body Torsion Reaction of Mice Caused by Acetic Acid Group Dosage (mg/kg) Number of animals Number of body torsions (n) Inhibition rate (%) Control N.S. 12 39.3±14.4 Indomethacin 7.5 12 2.7±4.1 93.1 Suppository of the invention 140.0 12 17.8±12.2 54.7 Suppository of the invention 198.0 12 15.1±7.2 61.6 Suppository of the invention 280.0 12 2.3±3.6 94.1 The results show that the suppository of the invention can remarkably reduce the number of body torsions of mice caused by acetic acid. The inhibition rate was 54.7% when the dosage of intrarectal administration was 140.0mg/kg (which was converted by 1.0g/60kg for human when administered intrarectally once, according to the method of dosage conversion by Xu Shuyun et al. in "Methodology of Pharmacological Experiments, 2nd edition, pp. 178~180, published by People's Health Press, Nov. 1991, Beijing), and the inhibition rate was positively correlated with the dosage. The results indicate that the suppository of the invention can inhibit pains of mice caused by chemical irritation and has analgesic effects. 2. Effects on Pains Caused by Electric Irritation to Tails of Mouse After fasting for 12 hours, 50 mice were randomly allotted into 5 groups based on their body weight and sex. The root of mouse's tail was stimulated with electric current of square wave ( 10ms of pulse width and 1Hz of the frequency). The pain threshold was determined as the electric intensity which just makes the mouse screaming. The drug was intrarectally administered with the volume of 0.05ml per mouse. The dosage administered are listed in Table 2. The effect on pains was determined respectively at 20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes after the medication, and the analgesic percentage of the test group was calculated as followings: Threshold after medication - Threshold before medication Threshold before medication x 100 The results show that the suppository of the invention can increase the pain threshold of mice in a dosage-dependence manner when administered intrarectally ( see Table 4 ). The initiation time of analgesic effects was negatively correlated with dosage of the drug, while the duration of the effect was positively correlated with the dosage. The time of analgesic effects in maximum appeared at 60 minutes after the medication ( see Table 5). No drug addiction was observed. Effects of Suppository of the Invention Administered Orally on the Pain Threshold of Tail Roots of Mice Caused by Electric Irritation Group Dosage (mg/kg) Number of animals Before medication Pain threshold (mA, X±SD) on different time (min) 20 40 60 90 120 Control N.S. 10 0.24±0.08 0.25±0.08 0.28±0.11 0.26±0.13 0.26±0.13 0.25±0.11 Indomethacin 7.5 10 0.22±0.08 0.32±0.06 0.41±0.12 0.44±0.15 0.41±0.13 0.38±0.13 Suppository of the invention 140.0 10 0.22±0.02 0.26±0.04 0.33±0.06 0.34±0.08 0.30±0.07 0.29±0.08 Suppository of the invention 198.0 10 0.25±0.07 0.32±0.10 0.34±0.12 0.36±0.10 0.38±0.09 0.33±0.09 Suppository of the invention 280.0 10 0.23±0.09 0.32±0.11 0.41±0.11 0.44±0.10 0.41±0.13 0.45±0.22 Increasing Percentage of the Pain Threshold of Tail Roots of Mice Caused by Electric Irritation after Administered Intrarectally with the Suppository of the Invention Group Dosage (mg/kg) Number of animals Increasing percentage of the pain threshold on the different time (min) 20 40 60 90 120 Control N.S. 10 -0.42±18.1 7.76±27.5 7.19±35.8 -4.14±37.4 0.024±32.5 Indomethacin 7.5 10 37.4±18.4 71.4±39.4 86.3±45.9 72.5±59.1 69.6±62.3 Suppository of the invention 140.0 10 21.5±18.4 32.0±12.5 43.1±25.6 40.5±36.5 34.5±31.8 Suppository of the invention 198.0 10 32.4±10.8 34.3±8.7 52.8±16.2 66.6±33.1 39.4±31.9 Suppository of the invention 280.0 10 42.5±31.4 90.9±43.1 107.7±53.0 99.2±71.3 101.7±81.7 Analgesic Effects of Clam Extract of the Invention Administered Orally on Pains in Mice Caused by Chemical Irritation. I. Testing Materials 1. Drugs: Clam extract of the invention was dissolved in 2N acetic acid and the pH value was adjusted to be 6.5~7.0. The normal saline in an adequate amount was added to formulate a solution. Indomethacin: produced by Shijiazhuang Pharmaceutical Factory, with the lot number of 009011021, which was formulated into a suspension with 2% of starch paste. 2. Animals: Kunming strain mice, male and female, with body weight of 20±2g, provided by the Department of Animals of Beijing Medical University. II. Testing Methods and Results Fifty mice were randomly allotted into 5 groups based on their body weight and sex. In the control group, 0.2ml/kg body weight of normal saline was administered per oral; while in the positive group, 30mg/kg of indomethacin were administered per oral. In other three groups, 1g/kg, 2g/kg and 4g/kg of the solution of the invention were administered per oral respectively. 90 minutes later, 0.2ml of 0.6% acetic acid per mouse was intraperitoneally injected and the number of body torsion reactions ( abdominal excavation, extension of trunk and hind limbs, and elevation of buttock ) of the mouse observed within 15 minutes after the injection of acetic acid was recorded. Effects of Solution of the Invention Administered Orally on Body Torsion Reaction of Mice Caused by Acetic Acid Group Dosage (g/kg) Number of animals Number of body torsions (n) Inhibition rate (%) Control N.S. 10 44.1±12.8 Indomethacin 0.03 10 2.8±4.8 93.7 Solution of the invention 1.0 10 24.8±12.2 43.8 Solution of the invention 2.0 10 17.5±7.1 60.3 Solution of the invention 4.0 10 4.3±4.6 89.2 The results of Table 6 show that the solution of the invention can remarkably reduce the number of body torsions of mice caused by acetic acid and the inhibition effect is positively correlated with the dosage, which indicate that the clam extract of the invention can inhibit pains of mice caused by chemical irritation and has analgesic effects. Inhibition Rate of Clam Extract on Tumor of Ehrlich's Ascites Carcinoma in Mice Testing Animals: Female Kunming strain mice with 18~21g of body weight. Tumor Model: Ehrlich's Ascites Carcinoma (EAC) Drugs: Clam extract prepared according to the method of the invention from Cristaria plicata Lea, which was dissolved in normal saline. The solution of clam extract was adjusted to be pH6.5, and was then sterilized and filtered. Testing Methods: A. Inoculation: Take the white ascites which was previously produced in mice by inoculating Ehrlich's Ascites Carcinoma and cultivating for one week, to which normal saline was added in a proportion as 1:2 ( white ascites: normal saline). Then 0.2ml of the mixture was subcutaneously injected at axillary fossa. B. Grouping: On the next day after the inoculation, mice were randomly allotted into 4 groups wherein the three groups (group 2,3 and 4) were administered daily with lg/kg, 1.5g/kg and 2g/kg respectively. While the negative control group (group 1) were administered with normal saline in a corresponding equivalent amount. C. Administration Route : Oral administration, once per day for successive 6 days. D. Evaluation of Affects: 24 hours after stopping medication, mice were killed and their body weight were weighed. The tumor mass was also weighed after being stripped. Inhibition Rate of Tumor = C-T T x 100 Wherein T means the average weight of tumor in the medication group and C means the average weight of tumor in the control group. Inhibition Rate of Solution of the Invention Administered Orally to Mice on Ascites Tumor of Ehrlieh's Carcinoma. Number of group Number of mice Mortality (%) Body weight Average weight of tumor Inhibition rate of tumor (%) P value At the beginning At the end At the beginning (g) At the end (g) 1 15 15 0 19.2 21.6 1.12 0 2 15 15 0 19.0 21.1 0.77 31.6 0.05 3 15 15 0 19.5 21.9 0.53 52.5 0.01 4 15 15 0 19.1 22.0 0.58 43.4 0.01 The results ( see Table 7 ) show that the inhibition rate of the extract according to the invention for Ehrlich's ascites carcinoma (EAC) can achieve 31.6%~52.5%. The pharmaceutical composition according to the invention comprises an effective amount of clam extract of the invention and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and/or assistant agent. The carriers and/or assistant agents used are conventional ones. The administration routes of the pharmaceutical composition of the invention may be per oral, injection, local application or intracavitary medication. For oral administration, a dose of 0.5~2g for each time and 2 to 4 times a day is used for an adult. For injection, a dose of 100~300mg for each time and 2 to 4 times per day is used for an adult. When the drug is administered intracavitarily, a dosage 0.1~0.5g each time and 2~4 times a day is used for an adult. An adequate amount of drug is used for local application. Various preparation forms can be made from the pharmaceutical composition of the invention, such as tablets, sugar-coated enteric soluble tablets, capsules, e.g. gastric soluble capsules and enteric soluble capsules, suppositories, oral liquid, microcapsules, ointments, water solutions, powder injections or injections, etc. According to the invention, a method of analgesia and treatment of tumor or carcinoma, comprises administrating to patients an effective amount of the clam extract of the invention. The clam extract of this invention may also be formulated into tablets, capsules, decoctions, oral solutions and other preparation forms in combination with other drugs or extracts, such as Radix Arnebiae seu Lithospermi, Radix Notoginseng, hydrolyzed pearl powder, solution of Cordyceps sinensis, Indigo Naturalis, Radix Polygalae, Semen Ziziphi Spinosae extract of Lentinus edodes (berk) sing, glycerin extract, etc. not only to achieve the above-mentioned objections, but also to broaden applications, such as treatment of scald, prevention of infection, treatment of diseases of cardiovascular system, abdominal pain, insomnia, etc., and to strengthen immunity, constitution and function of human body, etc. Clinical Test 1 I. Test Drug: Suppository (lg/dose) prepared from clam extract of the invention. II. Dosage: One dose at each time and two times a day for successive 3 days. The suppository was inserted into rectum above anus 5cm. III. Selection of Patients: Cancer patients with moderate or severe pain. IV. Method of Pain Grading: Grading was made according to VAS and VRS methods. Grading of pain relief: remarkably effective, effective, and non-effective were graded. V. General Information: Up to February, 1994, a total of 10 cases were observed and used. Among them 7 were male and 3 were female. Their ages ranged from 25 to 76. Diagnosis: pulmonary carcinoma: 6 cases; esophageal carcinoma, adenocarcinoma of pancreas, malignant lymphoma, and pituitary tumor: one case each. VI. Observation on Analgesic Effect: Grade of Pain Number of cases Remarkably effective Effective Non-effective Effective rate Mild Moderate 2 2 Severe 8 1 6 1 Total 10 3 6 1 90% In most of above cases, analgesic effect began to appear within 1~2 hours after medication and the duration of pain relief varied from 8 to 24 hours. VII. Typical Case Report: Patient A: male, 59 years old, suffered from pulmonary carcinoma of the right lung with metastasis to retroperitoneal lymph nodes and right adrenal gland. The adenocarcinoma was diagnosed by pathology. His chief complaint was pains at upper abdomen and waist with disturbed sleep. He had been treated with Dihydroeprophy (DHP). At first 4~6 tablets per day were administered, then the treatment was changed by using suppository of the invention, one dose a time intrarectally, 2 times per day. Pain disappeared completely during treatment and the clinical evaluation was a complete pain relief. Administration was stopped after treatment for 3 successive days. The patient asked for continuation of intrarectal administration for analgesia. VIII. No toxic side effect of the suppository of the invention has been observed in the above-mentioned clinical application. It was effective in relieving pain caused by tumor, and the effective rate was 90%. Clinical Test 2 From November, 1993 to January, 1994, the suppositories made from clam extract of the invention were used to treat 20 patients (43 cases ) with pain complicated or/and accompanying with various cancers. The information of observation is as follows: I. General Clinical Data: 1. Sex and age: In this 20 patients, 13 were male and 7 were female. The minimal age was 30 and maximal 76 ( median age 54.2 ). 2. Selection of patients (1) Patients suffered from various kinds of cancers which had all been confirmed by histopathology or/and cytology, and the complications such as bone metastasis had all been confirmed by roentgenogram, ECT or CT examination. (2) Radiotherapy had not been applied or chemotherapy regime had not been changed during recent 4 weeks. The pathologic types and pain complicated or/and accompanying cancer in these 20 patients were as follows: A. Pulmonary carcinoma, 8 cases (adenocarcinoma, 5 cases; small cell carcinoma, 3 cases). The pain was induced by bone metastasis in 5 cases, accompanying chest pain in 2 cases, and concomitant urinary lithiasis in 1 cases. Malignant mesothelioma on right pleura was diagnosed in one patient. B. Tumor of digestive tract, 4 cases (gastric carcinoma, 3 cases; colon cancer, 1 case). The pain was all induced by hepatic metastasis. In two patients with primary carcinoma of liver, one had pain at hepatic region and the pain in the other patients was caused by bone metastasis of cancer. C. Mammary cancer, 4 cases. Accompanying pain caused by periarthritis of shoulder in one case and by occult cleft of spine of sacral vertebrae in another one. In the other two patients pain was induced respectively by metastasis of cancer to chest wall and to left hip bone. D. Prostatic carcinoma, 1 case. The pain was induced by multiple bone metastasis after surgical operation. II. Methods of treatment and observation 1. Suppository of the invention (1) Administration: One dose ( containing lg of drug/dose) at a time was inserted into the rectum, 5cm above anus. (2) Dosage: One dose (1g) a time, two doses per day. One course of treatment lasted 1 to 3 days. Pain was evaluated separately at 0.5,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 hours after administration. 2. Symptoms were recorded and biochemical monitoring were performed in all patients. The symptoms included pain, mobility, nausea and vomiting, appetite and defecation, etc. Blood biochemical tests included routine examinations of blood, platelet count, concentrations of potassium, sodium, chlorine, calcium, phosphorus, transaminase, urea nitrogen creatinie, globulin, alkaline phosphatase, transpeptidase, and etc. in blood. III. Results of Treatment and Observation: 1. Grading criteria for clinical index, based on the streaking method (VAS) and on grading by subjective complaint of pain (VRS): 0 means painlessness; 1~3 means mild pain that can be tolerated by patients, whose daily life and sleep are normal; 4~7 means moderate pain which disturbs sleep of patients and patients ask for analgesics; 8 or up means severe pain which greatly disturbs sleep of patient and should be treated with narcotics. In this test, 5 patients had mild pain, 10 had moderate pain, and 5 had severe pain. 2. Criteria for evaluation of the therapeutic effects: Complete relief: Patients do not suffer from pains at all. Remarkable relief: The severity of pain is evidently lessened compared with that before medication, and the patients can live normally without sleep disturbing essentially. Slight relief: The severity of pain is lessened somewhat than that before medication, however, there is still remarkable pain, and sleep is still disturbed. No effect: There is no difference in severity of pain before and after medication. 3. Therapeutic effects: (I) Analgesia: In the above 20 patients, complete relief was observed in 5 cases, remarkable relief in 12 and slight relief in 2 . The overall effective rate was 95.0%. (2) Time of initiation of analgesic effect: Analgesic effect appeared at half an hour after administration in all of these 20 patients. (3) Time of the best analgesic effect: It appeared mostly at 2~5 hours after administration. (4) Duration of analgesic effect: The longest duration was 10 hours, which was longer than that of indomethacin suppository. (5) Analgesia and the time of administration: The analgesic effect was better when the drug was administered more frequently than less frequently. (6) The observation result of analgesic effect is shown in the following table: Grade of pain Number of patient Remarkable effective Effective Non-effective Effective rate Mild 5 4 1 80% Moderate 10 9 1 100% Severe 5 4 1 100% Total 20 17 2 1 95% 4. Side-effect: No noxious side-effect on kidney and liver functions was observed. The number of defecation times increased or urgency of defecation occurred in some individual patients after medication. In the 20 patients treated, one defecated immediately, 7 defecated an hour after medication, and the rest 12 patients could defecate 2 or more than 2 hours after medication by self-control. No anus irritation and other phenomena were observed. One patient experienced weakness of lower limbs, who was a 76 years old suffering from bone metastasis of prostatic carcinoma. His severe pain relieved evidently after medication. However, weakness of lower limbs appeared after 3 times of medication and inability to stand up due to weakness of the legs after 5 times of medication. But, weakness of legs disappeared quickly after stopping medication. The preparation method of the clam extract according to the invention will be further described in detail in the following examples, but the scope of the invention does not limit to these examples. Example 1 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken and smashed with TM-85 Model colloidal mill to particles of average diameter of 10µ. pH value was adjusted to 3.85 with acetic acid under stirring, then 2000ml of ethanol was added, and kept still for 8 hours after stirred homogeneously. The supernatant was taken and the pH value of the supernatant was adjusted to 13 with NaOH. Ethanol was added till its content reached 75%. Then the mixture was stirred homogeneously and kept stand for 8 hours. The precipitate was taken and acetic acid was added till the pH value was 6.0. A faint yellow extract was obtained after freeze drying. The productive rate was 0.18% of the original clam weight. Example 2 2kg of clam meat from Anodonta woodiana Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method same as Example 1. The productive rate was 0.16% of the original clam weight. Example 3 Clam meat from 6kg of Hyriopsis cumingii Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method same as Example 1. The productive rate was 0.08% of the original clam weight. Example 4 Clam meat from total weight 6kg of Cristaria plicata Lea and Anodonta woodiana Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method same as Example 1. The productive rate was 0.17% of the original clam weight. Example 5 Clam meat from 4kg of Hyriopsis cumingii Lea were taken. A light brown extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example I except that the period of standstill was 24 hours. The productive rate was 0.08% of the original clam weight. Example 6 Clam meats from 7kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example I except that the standstill was replaced by taking supernatant directly. The productive rate was 0.18% of the original clam weight. Example 7 Clam meats from total weight 9kg of Cristaria plicata Lea, Anodonta woodiana Lea, Hyriopsis cumingii Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method same as Example 1. The productive rate was 0.21% of the original clam weight. Example 8 Clam meats from Cristaria plicata Lea, Anodonta woodiana Lea, Hyriopsis cumingii Lea, each weighting 3kg, were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except that 2 mol of hydrochloric acid was used instead of acetic acid. The productive rate was 0.37% of the original clam weight. Example 9 Clam meats from Cristaria plicata Lea and Anodonta woodiana Lea, each weighting 3kg, were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except the pH was adjusted by citric acid. The productive rate was 0.42% of the original clam weight. Example 10 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except the pH was adjusted to 2.15 with acid. The productive rate was 0.20% of the original clam weight. Example 11 Clam meat from 3kg of Anodonta woodiana Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except that the ethanol added was 1800ml. The productive rate was 0.36% of original clam weight. Example 12 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except that the added ethanol was 1500ml. The productive rate was 0.24% of the original clam weight. Example 13 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except that no ethanol was added after the alkali was added. The productive rate was 0.14% of the original clam weight. Example 14 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example I except that 2N of KOH was added instead of NaOH. The productive rate was 0.14% of the original clam weight. Example 15 Clam meat from 3kg of Critaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except that no alkali and no ethanol in alkali treatment step was used. The productive rate was 0.22% of the original clam weight. Example 16 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except that spray drier of GA32 model was used to dewatering and drying. The productive rate was 0.21% of the original clam weight. Example 17 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except that ether was used to dewatering and drying. The productive rate was 0.25% of the original clam weight. Example 18 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except that a mixture of hydrochloric acid, citric acid and acetic acid in a rate of 1:1:1 was used instead of acetic acid. The productive rate was 0.63% of the original clam weight. Example 19 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except that the clam meat was smashed into particles of average size of 5µm. The productive rate was 0.81% of the original clam weight. Example 20 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicate Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example I except that the clam meat was smashed into particles of average size of 20µm. The productive rate was 0.23% of the original clam weight. Example 21 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except that the JL85-IB model of mincing machine was used for smashing. The productive rate was 0.11% of the original clam weight. Example 22 Clam meat from 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. A faint yellow extract was obtained by the preparation method similar to Example 1 except that no alkali and no ethanol in alkali treatment step were added, and the supernatant was ultrafiltered, concentrated by reverse osmose and directly freeze dried. The productive rate was 0.11% of the original clam weight. Example 23 Clam meat from 4kg of Hyriopsis cumingii Lea were taken. The clam meat was smashed by a JM-85 model colloidal mill, and vaal water being 33% of the original clam weight was added. The mixture was then stirred and hydrochloric acid being 4% of the original clam weight was added. The mixture was heated at 88°C for half an hour, then the suppernatant was taken and NaOH was added till pH value was 7.50. Then the mixture was left to stand and the precipitate was taken, and hydrochloric acid was added to the precipitate till the pH value was 5.5. Then the mixture was freeze dried to obtain a faint yellow extract. The productive rate was 0.15% of the original clam weight. Example 24 Clam meat from 7.5kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. The clam meat was smashed by a JM-85 model colloidal mill, and vaal water being 98% of the original clam weight was added. The mixture was then stirred and acetic acid being 12% of the original clam weight was added. The mixture was heated at 55°C for 4.5 hours, then the suppernatant was taken and KOH was added till pH value was 13.50. Then the mixture was left to stand and the precipitate was taken, and acetic acid was added to the precipitate till the pH value was 7.0. Then the mixture was spray dried to obtain a faint brown extract. The productive rate was 0.65% of the original clam weight. Example 25 Clam meats from 4kg of Hyriopsis cumingii Lea, 3kg of Anodonta woodiana Lea and 3kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. The clam meat was smashed by a JM-85 Model colloidal mill, and vaal water being 65% of the original clam weight was added. The mixture then was stirred and the acid mixture of hydrochloric acid , acetic acid and citric acid, being 8.5% of the original clam weight was added. The mixture was heated at 66°C for 2 hours, then the suppernatant was taken and NaOH was added till pH value was 10.5. Then the mixture was left to stand and the precipitate was taken and dehydration dried to obtain a faint yellow extract. The productive rate was 0.28% of the original clam weight. Example 26 Clam meat from 1.5kg of Cristaria plicata Lea were taken. The preparation process was the same as that of Example 1. The obtained extract was extracted repeatedly for 4 times by the preparation process. A faint yellow extract was obtained and the productive rate was 0.06% of the original clam weight.

Claims: A process for preparing a clam extract, comprising the steps of: grinding clam meat; treating the ground clam meat with acid and alcohol; separating the acid-and-alcohol treated substances to obtain a clear liquid; and concentrating the clear liquid to give a clam extract, or treating the clear liquid with alkali to give, by separation, a precipitate which is a clam extract. The process according to Claim 1 further comprising dehydration drying of the concentrated substance or the precipitate. The process according to Claim 1 or 2, wherein pH value is 2.0~5.5 in the acid-and-alcohol treatment. The process according to Claim 1 or 2, wherein the clam meat is preferably taken from Anodonta woodiana Lea, Cristaria plicata, Hyriopsis cumingii or a mixture thereof. The process according to Claim 1 or 2, wherein the acid is fatty acid with C 2 -C 8 straight chain or branch chain, or hydrochloric acid. The process according to Claim 1 or 2, wherein the acid is preferably acetic acid, citric acid, hydrochloric acid or a mixture thereof. The process according to Claim 1 or 2, wherein the average size of the smashed clam meat is less than 1mm. The process according to Claim 1 or 2, wherein the alcohol in the acid-and-alcohol treatment step is ethanol. The process according to Claim 1 or 2, wherein the alkali in the step of alkali treatment of the clear liquid is preferably sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide. The process according to Claim 9, wherein pH value is 8~13 in the alkali treatment. The process according to Claim 9, wherein ethanol can be added in the step of alkali treatment. The process according to Claim 2, wherein the separated precipitate after the treatment of clear liquid with alkali is treated with acid before the freeze drying or spray drying. A process for preparing a clam extract, comprising the steps of: grinding clam meat; treating the ground clam meat with heat in the presence of acid and water, wherein the pH value is 2-6 in the treating process. separating the heat-treated substance to obtain a clear liquid; concentrating the clear liquid to give a clam extract. The process according to Claim 13, further comprising dehydration drying of the concentrated substances. The process according to Claim 13 or 14, wherein the temperature of the heat treatment is 48~88 °C. A clam extract obtainable by the process of claim 1 or 13. A pharmaceutical composition for pain relief, comprising an effective amount of clam extract obtainable by the process according to one of Claims 1 to 15 and one or more pharmalogically acceptable carriers or excipients. The use of the clam extract obtainable by the process according to one of Claims 1 to 15 for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of pain and/or for inhibiting cancers.

Inventors: BI JIELIANG, BI, JIELIANG
Applicants: BEIJING TAIHENG BIOMED TECH, BI JIELIANG, BEIJING TAIHENG BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, BI, JIELIANG
Application year: 1994
Main classification: A61K35
IPC codes: A61K35, A61P25, A61P35