TRANSGENIC PLANTS CONTAINING MULTIPLE DISEASE RESISTANCE GENES

Abstract: In accordance with the present invention, there are provided transgenic plants comprising a plurality of plant-defense-associated proteins that are expressed to produce such proteins in an amount sufficient to increase the plants' resistance to plant pathogens, relative to non-transgenic plants of the same species. The transgenic plants are useful to study patterns of development, and to provide increased resistance to plant pathogens when grown in crops as a food source, and the like. Nucleic acid constructs are also provided that are useful in methods for producing the invention transgenic plants.

Description: Transgenic Plants Containing Multiple Disease Resistance Genes The present invention relates to transgenic plants containing at least two plant-defense-associated transgenes. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The interactions between plants and various soil life forms are very complex, in some instances helpful to the plant and in other instances deleterious to the plant. Fungi harmful to plants (fungal pathogens) include fungal species from a wide variety of genera, including Fusarium, Pythiu , Phytophthora, Verticillium, Rhizoctonia, Macrophomina, Thielaviopsis, Sclerotinia and numerous others. Plant diseases caused by fungi include pre- and post-emergence seedling damping-off, hypocotyl rots, root rots, crown rots, vascular wilts and a variety of other symptoms. Nematodes harmful to plants (nematode pathogens) include nematode species from the genera Meloidogyne, Heterodera, Ditylenchus, and Pratylenchus. Plant diseases caused by nematodes include root galls, root rot, lesions, "stubby" root, stunting, and various other rots and wilts associated with increased infection by pathogenic fungi. Some nematodes (e.g., Trichodorus, Lonoidorus, Xiphenema) can serve as vectors for virus diseases in a number of plants including Prunus, grape, tobacco and tomato. Plant disease is the exception rather than the rule, as many plant pathogens express a virulent phenotype only on one or a limited number of host species. Pathogens inoculated onto a non-host species either lack the ability to grow and infect that plant, or following ingress invariably encounter a successful resistance mechanism. Interactions with host species exhibit a range of specificities dependent on the mechanism of the pathogen. One type of pathogen is the unspecialized "thug", which is necrotrophic and damages the host through production of toxins and/or enzymes. This pathogen is often equipped with inactivation or avoidance mechanisms to deal with host defenses. In contrast, "con men" pathogens grow biotrophically, avoiding serious host damage, at least in the early stages. Unlike thugs, con men pathogens do not activate host defenses nonspecifically. For specialized pathogens having no avoidance mechanisms, host defenses are usually effective if induced. In specific interactions, following attempted infection by the pathogen, molecular signals determine whether the interaction will be incompatible or compatible. In an incompatible interaction (host resistant, pathogen avirulent) , early molecular recognition is followed by rapid expression of defense responses. In a compatible interaction (host susceptible, pathogen virulent) , the pathogen eludes the plant's surveillance mechanisms and disease generally ensues. Various approaches have been utilized for attempting to control deleterious fungi and nematodes. One method is application of certain naturally occurring bacteria which inhibit or interfere with fungi or nematodes. See, for example, K.F. Baker and R.J. Cook, Biological Control of Plant Pathogens, Freeman and Co. (1974) , for a description of fungi and nematodes and their interaction with plants, as well as a description of means for biological control of fungal and nematode pathogens. Another method is breeding for resistance, which is primarily focussed on the manipulation of minor resistance genes which make small quantitative contributions to the overall resistance of the plant. Lytic enzymes have been individually transduced to form single-gene transgenic plants. For example, transfer of a tobacco basic vacuolar chitinase gene under the control of the CAMV35S promoter into the closely related species, N. sylvestris, did not give effective protection against C. nicotianae, even in transgenic plants exhibiting constitutively high levels of chitinase activity (Neuhaus et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 16:141-151, 1991). See also US Patent 4,940,840 to Suslow et al. Recombinant bean chitinase has been expressed in transgenic tobacco seedlings (Broglie et al., Science. 254:1194-1197, 1991). The seedlings of the chitinase- containing transgenic plants have an enhanced, but not complete, resistance to a single species of fungi. Thus, it is desirable to obtain plants that have higher resistance levels to fungal pathogens than existing plants. SUMMARY OF INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, there are provided transgenic plants. Inention plants comprise a plurality of plant-defense-associated proteins that are expressed in an amount sufficient to increase the level of the plant's resistance to plant pathogens, relative to non-transgenic plants of the same species. Plants or plant cells of the present invention are useful to study patterns of development, and to provide increased resistance to plant pathogens when grown in crops as a food source, and the like. Nucleic acid constructs are provided that are useful for producing the invention transgenic plants. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES Figure 1 shows the results of the Cercospora nicotinae fungal infection assay described in the Examples for the F4 generation invention transgenic tobacco plants. O = wild type tobacco plant, D = chitinase transgenic tobacco plant, D = glucanase transgenic tobacco plant, β = chitinase/glucanase transgenic plant. Figure 2 shows the results of the Cercospora nicotinae fungal infection assay described in the Examples for the heterozygous F3 generation invention transgenic tobacco plants. D = wild type tobacco plant, O = chitinase transgenic tobacco plant, t = glucanase transgenic tobacco plant, ■ = chitinase/glucanase transgenic plant. Figures 3A (day 4 data) and 3B (day 5 data) show the results of one of the Thanatephorus cucumeris fungal infection assays described in the Examples. The key in descending order corresponds to each cluster of bars from left to right on the bar graph. WT= wild type tobacco plant; GLC/3 and GLC/11 = are glucanase transgenic tobacco plants; Cht/17 = chitinase transgenic tobacco plant; X/7 and X/3 are chitinase/glucanase transgenic tobacco plants. Figures 4A, 4B, and 4C show the results of one of the Thanatephorus cucumeris fungal infection assays described in the Examples. The key in descending order corresponds to each cluster of bars from left to right on the bar graph. T = wild type tobacco plant; B2 = glucanase transgenic tobacco plant; C2 = chitinase transgenic tobacco plant; and C2B2 = chitinase/glucanase transgenic tobacco plant. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, there are provided transgenic plants comprising: a plurality of transgenes wherein each transgene encodes a plant-defense-associated protein. In another embodiment, there are provided transgenic plants comprising: a first transgene encoding a first overexpressed plant-defense-associated protein; and a second transgene encoding a second overexpressed plant-defense-associated protein, wherein the second plant-defense-associated protein is different from the first plant-defense-associated protein. The term "plant" refers to whole plants, plant organs (e.g., leaves, stems, roots, etc.), seeds, plant cells, and the like. Plants contemplated for use in the practice of the present invention include both monocotyledons and dicotyledons. Exemplary monocotyledons contemplated for use in the practice of the present invention include rice, wheat, maize, sorgham, barley, oat, forage grains, as well as other grains. Exemplary dicotyledons include tomato, tobacco, potato, bean, soybean, and the like. The phrase "plants of the same species" refers to plants that have substantially completely identical genotypes, except for the inheritable nucleic acid transgenes that are introduced by the methods disclosed herein. A "transgenic plant" refers to a plant or plant material that contains an inheritable expression cassette containing a recombinant transgene. A transgenic plant according to the present invention is a plant or plant material that contains one or more inheritable recombinant nucleic acid expression cassettes encoding at least 2 total plant-defense-associated proteins. Preferably the invention transgenic plant contains at least 3 plant-defense-associated proteins, more preferably at least 5, with at least 10 plant-defense- associated proteins being most desirable. The plant-defense-associated proteins may be encoded by a gene that is foreign to the recipient plant (with respect to species to which the recipient belongs, i.e., heterologous/exogenous) , foreign only to the particular individual recipient (i.e., exogenous), or genetic information already possessed by the recipient (i.e., endogenous). When an expression cassette contains an endogenous gene encoding a naturally occurring plant- defense-associated protein, the cDNA for such endogenous gene is operatively linked to a promoter different from its native promoter, such that the gene can be overexpressed relative to expression levels that naturally occur in the non-invention transgenic plant, i.e., the plant is capable of producing higher levels of the encoded protein than are naturally produced. As used herein, an "overexpressed" plant- defense-associated protein refers to a protein that is produced in higher amounts than are produced endogenously. Overexpression can be achieved, for example, by linking a transgene to an appropriate constitutive promoter, such that the transgene is continually expressed. Alternatively, the transgene can be linked to a strong, inducible promoter so that overexpression can occur on demand. Suitable levels of overexpression include expression of the transgene about 1.5-fold up to about 1000-fold or more over the naturally occurring level of expression of the endogenous transgene. Preferred levels of overexpression are at least about 5-fold, with at least about 10-fold over the naturally occurring level of expression of the endogenous transgene being especially preferred. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the transgenic plant comprises a first exogenous transgene encoding a first heterologous plant-defense-associated protein; and a second exogenous transgene encoding a second heterologous plant-defense-associated protein. A "heterologous protein" refers to a plant- defense-associated-protein encoded by a transgene obtained from a species different from the species into which the heterologous protein is transduced (i.e., a species different from the invention transgenic plant species) . Protein (or polypeptide) is a term used herein to designate a linear series of amino acid residues connected one to the other by way of a peptide bond. The heterologous protein may have distinctive properties relative to the properties of endogenously produced antimicrobial defense proteins. The heterologous protein is preferably constitutively expressed, although the natural expression of the endogenous gene encoding the protein may be inducible in response to stress. Suitable "plant-defense-associated-proteins" contemplated for use in the invention transgenic plants are those classes of proteins that are involved in specific plant defense mechanism pathways, such as, for example, lytic enzymes, thaumatine-like proteins, α- thionin (e.g., Bohlmann et al., EMBO J.. 7:1559-1565, 1988), zeamatin (e.g., Vigers et al., Mol. Plant Micro. Interactions, 4:315-323, 1991) pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins (e.g., Bol et al., Ann. Rev. Phytopathol.. 28:113-138, 1990), ribosome-inactivating-proteins (RIPs) (e.g., Leach et al., J. Biol. Chem. , 266:1564-1573, 1990), lectins (e.g., Moreno et al. , PNAS, USA. 86:7885- 7889, 1989), cecropins, non-plant lysozymes, the Bacillus thuringensis toxin, enzymes involved in phytoalexin biosynthesis, proteinase inhibitors (e.g., Garcia-Olmedoz et al., Surv. Plant Mol. Cell Biol.. 4:275-334, 1987), inducers of plant disease resistance mechanisms, and the like. As used herein, "lytic enzyme" refers to a protein that is able to enzymatically cleave a bond or bonds of a molecule that is essential for the survival of a known pathogen. Exemplary lytic enzymes include chitinase, glucanase, cellulase, trehelase, and the like. See also, Boiler T. , (1987) "Hydrolytic enzymes in plant disease resistance." in T. Kosuge, E.W. Nester, eds. Plant-Microbe Interactions. Vol 2. Macmillan, New York, pp 385-413, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. As used herein, "chitinase" refers to an enzyme that is capable of degrading chitin. In one embodiment, a chitinase construct that constitutively expresses the chitinase protein is employed. Preferably, the chitinase gene employed herein is rice basic chitinase. An exemplary sequence encoding rice chitinase is set forth in SEQ ID NO:l. Other suitable chitinase genes for use herein are described, for example, in US Patent 4,940,840 to Suslow, incorporated herein by reference. See also the list of published chitinase nucleotide sequences in Table 1 of Collinge et al.. Plant Journal. 3:31-40, (1993), incorporated herein by reference. In addition, suitable chitinase genes can be obtained employing methods well- known in the art. For example, the nucleic acid molecule of SEQ ID NO:l can be used as a probe to isolate related genes with chitinase activity from genomic or cDNA libraries of organisms known to produce chitinase proteins, such as Trichoderma harzianum , strain PI (ATCC No. 74058; see also US Patent 5,173,419). See Sa brook et al., Molecular Cloning— A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., (1989) . In another embodiment, a glucanase construct that constitutively expresses the endo-1,4- /3-glucanase protein is employed. The term "glucanase" refers to an enzyme that is capable of degrading callose. Preferably, the glucanase gene employed herein is a class II alfalfa acidic /3-glucanase. An exemplary sequence encoding a class II alfalfa /3-glucanase is set forth in SEQ ID NO:3. Other glucanase genes (cDNA) suitable for use herein are derived from: tomato (ATCC No. 68312; see also US Patent 5,168,064, incorporated herein by reference), avocado (Christoffersen et al. Plant Molec. Biol.. 3:385, 1984) and bean (Tucker et al., Plant Physiol. , 88:1257, 1988) . In addition, see the tobacco glucanase sequences described in: Payne et al., Plant Mol. Biol.. 15:797-808 (1990); Ward et al., Plant Physiol.. 96:390-397 (1991); and the glucanase sequence described in Linthorst et al. , PNAS.USA, 87:8756-8760 (1990). Suitable glucanase genes can also be obtained employing methods well-known in the art. For example, the nucleic acid molecule of SEQ ID NO:3 can be used as a probe to isolate related genes with glucanase activity (see Sambrook et al., supra) . In a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention, the first and second proteins employed in the transgenic plant are chitinase and glucanase, respectiv The plant-defense-associated proteins described herein are encoded by recombinant transgene molecules. As used herein, the term "transgene" refers to a DNA or RNA molecule. Transgenes employed herein encode a biologically active amino acid sequence (i.e., a protein) . The term "plurality of transgenes" refers to greater than or equal to 2 total transgenes encoding plant-defense-associated proteins. Preferably the invention transgenic plant contains at least 3 different transgenes encoding plant-defense-associated proteins, more preferably at least 5, with at least 10 different transgenes being most desirable. One of skill in the art will recognize that the transgenes employed herein encode the necessary signals required for expression of a biologically active protein, such as appropriate leader peptide sequences and the like. A biologically active protein is a protein that has at least one of the physiologically properties exhibited under naturally occurring physiological conditions. The transgenes encoding the plant-defense- associated proteins are typically contained in expression cassettes. The phrase "expression cassette" refers to a DNA molecule that is able to direct the transcription and translation of a structural gene (i.e., cDNA) so that a desired protein is synthesized. The expression cassette comprises at least one promoter operatively linked to at least one transgene encoding a desired protein, and a transcription terminator sequence. Thus, the protein- encoding segment is transcribed under regulation of the promoter region, into a transcript capable of providing, upon translation, the desired protein. Appropriate reading frame positioning and orientation of the various segments of the expression cassette are within the knowledge of persons of ordinary skill in the art; further details are given in the Examples. The promoter region refers to the portion of a gene that controls transcription of DNA to which it is operatively linked. The promoter region includes specific sequences of DNA that are sufficient for RNA polymerase recognition, binding and transcription initiation. The particular promoter selected should be capable of causing sufficient expression to result in the production of an effective amount of plant-defense- associated protein to the plants resistance to microbial infection. The amount of protein needed to induce resistance may vary with the type of plant. In a preferred embodiment, the promoter employed to express the transgenes is a constitutive promoter. It should be understood that this promoter may not be the optimal one for all embodiments of the present invention. A "constitutive" promoter is a promoter which is active under all environmental conditions and all stages of development or cell differentiation. Constitutive promoters suitable for use in the practice of the present invention are widely available and are well known in the art. Exemplary constitutive promoters include the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S ("CaMV35S") promoter (see US Patent 5,097,925, incorporated herein by reference) , CaMV19S promoter, nopaline synthase (NOS) , octipine synthase (OCS) , the rice actin gene promoter, and the like. In addition, the DNA promoter fragments from wheat described in U.S. Patent 5,139,954; and plant promoters described in U.S. Patent 5,097,025 are suitable for use herein. A presently preferred constitutive promoter for use in the practice of the present invention is CaMV35S. The promoters used in the DNA constructs of the present invention may be modified, if desired, to affect their control characteristics. For purposes of this description, the phrase "CaMV35S" promoter thus includes variations of CaMV35S promoter, e.g., promoters derived by means of ligation with operator regions, random or controlled mutagenesis as well as, single, tandem or multiple copies of 35S enhancer elements, and the like. In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there are provided nucleic acid construct(s) comprising the above-described expression cassette(s) . The term "nucleic acid construct," or the abbreviated form "construct," as used herein, and throughout the specification and claims, refers to a recombinant nucleic acid molecule which can include expression cassettes, origins of DNA replication, procaryotic and eucaryotic genes from various sources (such as selectable marker genes) , repressor genes, as well as any other sequence of nucleotides. The construct may be linear or in the circular form of a plasmid vector. The nucleic acid construct of the present invention, including the segments of the expression cassette(s) , are said to be "operably associated" with one another, such that said transgenes can be translationally expressed to produce the encoded protein under suitable conditions well-known to those of skill in the art. As used herein the term "plasmid" or "vector" refers to circular, double-stranded DNA loops, which are not bound to the chromosome. One of skill in the art will recognize that the terms plasmid and vector can be used interchangeably. A plasmid contains DNA capable of causing expression of DNA sequences contained therein, where such sequences are in operational association with other sequences capable of effecting their expression, such as promoter sequences, and the like. The type and number of vectors employed is not critical, so long as greater than or equal to 2 transgenes are inheritable, e.g., capable of being expressed by each generation of plant. Suitable vectors for use in expressing the plant- defense-associated transgenes described herein include: pAMVBTS (ATCC No. 53637; Barton et al., Plant Phvsiol.. 85:1103-1109 (1987); pBHOl (Jefferson et al., EMBO J.. 6:3902-3907, 1987); and the pGEM and pSP vectors (Promega, Madison, WI) . Presently preferred vectors for producing invention transgenic plants are the plasmids pBZ56, pM42X, and pBZlOO, described hereinafter in the Examples section. In accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention, there are provided plant cells transformed with the above-described DNA construct(s) . The term "resistance," when used in the context of comparing the level of resistance between an invention transgenic plant and another plant, refers to the ability of the invention transgenic plant to maintain a desirable phenotype in the face of attack, relative to a non- transgenic plant or a single-gene transgenic plant. The level of resistance can be determined by comparing the physical characteristics of the invention plant to non- transgenic plants that either have or have not been exposed to microbial infection. Exemplary physical characteristics to observe include plant height, an increase in population of plants that have ability to survive microbial challenge (i.e., plants that come in contact with a compatible pathogen) , delayed lesion development, reduced lesion size, and the like. As used herein, "increased resistance to pathogens" refers to a level of resistance that an invention transgenic plant has to plant pathogens above a defined reference level. The defined reference level of resistance to a pathogen is the level of resistance displayed by non-transgenic or non-invention transgenic plants of the same species. Thus, the increased resistance is measured relative to previously existing plants of the same species. In one embodiment of the invention, the resistance is substantially increased above the defined reference level, e.g., greater than or equal to 20% above, preferably 50% above, more preferably 75% above; with up to 100% above being especially preferred. The phrase "non-transgenic plants of the same species" means plants of the same species that do not contain any heterologous transgenes. The respective levels of pathogen resistance can be determined using well known methods including the Fungal Infection assays described hereinafter in the Examples section. The phrase "transgenic plants of the same species that only express one exogenous transgene" refers to transgenic plants of the same species that only contain one transgene. These single-gene transgenic plants can contain any transgene including any one of the plurality of plant-defense-associated transgenes employed in the invention transgenic plant. Exemplary transgenic plants containing a single heterologous transgene include: glyphosate-resistant plants described in U.S. Patent 5,188,642; and the plants described in Broglie et al., Science. 254:1194-1197 (1991); and Car ora et al., Plant J.. 3:457-462 (1992). In one embodiment of the present invention, the level of resistance imparted by the invention construct is "synergistic." Synergistic resistance refers to a level of resistance provided by at least two plant- defense-associated proteins in a single transgenic plant that is greater than the combined resistance observed for each protein contained individually in at least two single-gene transgenic plants. Methods of introducing the constructs employed herein into suitable host cells, as well as methods applicable for culturing said cells containing a gene encoding a heterologous protein, are generally known in the art. According to the invention, the vector is introduced into the host cell by any suitable means, e.g., transformation employing plasmids, viral, or bacterial phage vectors, transfection, electroporation, lipofection, and the like. The heterologous DNA can optionally include sequences which allow for the extrachromosomal maintenance of the expression cassette, or said expression cassette construct can be caused to integrate into the genome of the host (as an alternative means to ensure stable maintenance in the host) . See, for example: the agrobacterium mediated transformation of germinating plant seeds described in U.S. Patent 5,169,770; the plant potyvirus expression vector described in U.S. Patent 5,162,601; US Patent 5,168,064, each of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference. In addition, cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) may be used as a vector for introducing nucleic acid constructs into plant cells. (Hohn et al., "Molecular Biology of Plant Tumors , " Academic Press, New York, pp. 549-560 (1982); Howell, U.S. Pat. No. 4,407,956). In accordance with the described method, the entire CaMV viral DNA genome is inserted into a parent bacterial plasmid creating a recombinant DNA molecule which can be propagated in bacteria. After cloning, the recombinant plasmid is further modified by introduction of the desired sequence into unique restriction sites in the viral portion of the plasmid. The modified viral portion of the recombinant plasmid is then excised from the parent bacterial plasmid, and used to inoculate the plant cells or plants. Another suitable method of introducing DNA into plant cells is to infect a plant cell with Agrobacterium tumefacienε or A. rhizogenes that has previously been transformed with the gene. Under appropriate conditions known in the art, the transformed plant cells are grown to form shoots or roots, and develop further into plants. Agrobacterium is a representative genus of the gram- negative family Rhizobiaceae. Its species are responsible for crown gall (A. tumefacienε) and hairy root disease (A. rhizogenes) . The plant cells in crown gall tumors and hairy roots are induced to produce amino acid derivatives known as opines, which are catabolized only by the bacteria. The bacterial genes responsible for expression of opines are a convenient source of control elements for chimeric expression cassettes. In addition, assaying for the presence of opines can be used to identify transformed tissue. Heterologous genetic sequences can be introduced into appropriate plant cells, for example, by means of the Ti plasmid of A. tumefaciens or the Ri plasmid of A. rhizogenes . The Ti or Ri plasmid is transmitted to plant cells on infection by Agrobacterium and is stably integrated into the plant genome. J. Schell, Science , 237:1176-1183 (1987). Ti and Ri plasmids contain two regions essential for the production of transformed cells. One of these, named transferred DNA (T-DNA) , is transferred to plant nuclei and induces tumor or root formation. The other, termed the virulence (vir) region, is essential for the transfer of the T-DNA but is not itself transferred. The T-DNA will be transferred into a plant cell even if the vir region is on a different plasmid. Hoekema, et al., Nature , 303:179-189 (1983). The transferred DNA region can be increased in size by the insertion of heterologous DNA without affecting its ability to be transferred. A modified Ti or Ri plasmid, in which the disease-causing genes have been deleted, can be used as a vector for the transfer of the gene constructs of this invention into an appropriate plant cell. Construction of recombinant Ti and Ri plasmids in general follows methods typically used with the more common bacterial vectors, such as pBR322. Additional use can be made of accessory genetic elements sometimes found with the native plasmids and sometimes constructed from foreign sequences. These may include but are not limited to "shuttle vector," [Ruvkun and Ausubel, Nature , 298:85- 88 (1981)], promoters, [Lawton et al., Plant Mol . Biol . , j):315-324 (1987)] and structural genes for antibiotic resistance as a selection factor [Fraley et al., Proc. Nat . Acad. Sci . , 80:4803-4807 (1983)]. There are two common ways to transform plant cells with Agrobacterium: (1) co-cultivation of Agrobacterium with cultured isolated protoplasts (which requires an established culture system that allows for culturing protoplasts and subsequent plant regeneration from cultured protoplasts) , or (2) transformation of intact cells or tissues with Agrobacterium (which requires that the intact plant tissues, such as cotyledons, can be transformed by Agrobacterium, and that the transformed cells or tissues can be induced to regenerate into whole plants. Most dicot species can be transformed by Agrobacterium. All species which are a natural plant host for Agrobacterium are transformable in vitro. Monocotyledonous plants, and in particular, cereals, are not natural hosts to Agrobacterium. Attempts to transform them using Agrobacterium have been unsuccessful until recently. Hooykas-Van Slogteren et al., Nature , 311:763-764 (1984) . There is growing evidence now that certain monocots can be transformed by Agrobacterium. Indeed, cereal species such as rye (de la Pena et al., Nature , 325:274-275 (1987), corn (Rhodes et al., Science 240:204-207 (1988), and rice (Shimamoto et al., Nature, 338:274-276 (1989) may now be transformed. In one embodiment of the present invention, two expression cassettes containing transgenes encoding chitinase and glucanase are prepared as described above. The expression are combined into a single expression vector, to form a DNA construct which comprises two individual genes encoding plant-defense-associated proteins. The vector is then inserted into cultured A. tumefaciens cells which contain a disarmed Ti plasmid. In another embodiment of the present invention, two vectors are employed containing one expression cassette each. The two vectors are either transformed into a single plant or into separate plants. Two separate transgenic plants that each contain expression cassettes having at least one transgene can be sexually crossed using well-known methods to produce a transgenic plant of the present invention. Any of a number of standard breeding techniques can be used, depending upon the species to be crossed. In addition to plant transformation vectors derived from the Ti or root-inducing (Ri) plasmids of Agrobacterium, alternative methods can be used to insert the DNA constructs of this invention into plant cells. Such methods may involve, for example, the use of liposomes, electroporation, chemicals that increase free DNA uptake, and transformation using viruses. For example, the construct described above can be microinjected directly into plant cells by use of micropipettes to mechanically transfer the recombinant DNA. Crossway, Mol . Gen. Genetics , 202:179-185 (1985). The genetic material may also be transferred into the plant cell using polyethylene glycol, Krens, et al., ature, 2£6:72-74 (1982). Another method of introduction of transgene segments is high velocity ballistic penetration by small particles with the nucleic acid either within the matrix of small beads or particles, or on the surface (see, for example, Klein, et al.. Nature , 327:70-73. 1987). Yet another method of introduction is fusion of protoplasts with other entities, either minicells, cells, lysosomes or other fusible lipid-surfaced bodies (see, for example, Fraley, et al. , Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci . USA, 79:1859- 1863, 1982) . The DNA may also be introduced into the plant cells by electroporation. Fromm et al., Pro. Natl . Acad. Sci . USA, j$2.:5824 (1985). In this technique, plant protoplasts are electroporated in the presence of plasmids containing the expression cassette. Electrical impulses of high field strength reversibly permeabilize biomembranes allowing the introduction of the plasmids. Electroporated plant protoplasts reform the cell wall, divide, and regenerate. After transformation, transformed plant cells or plants comprising the invention nucleic acid constructs can be identified employing well-known methods. For example, a selectable marker, such as those discussed above, is typically used. Transformed plant cells can be selected by growing the cells on growth medium containing an appropriate antibiotic. The presence of opines can also be used if the plants are transformed with Agrobacterium. After selecting the transformed cells, one can confirm expression of the desired heterologous gene. Simple detection of mRNA encoded by the inserted DNA can be achieved by well known methods in the art, such as Northern blot hybridization. The inserted sequence can be identified by Southern blot hybridization, as well. Once the presence of the desired transgenes is confirmed, whole plant regeneration is desired. All plants from which protoplasts can be isolated and cultured to give whole regenerated plants can be transformed by the present invention. Some suitable plants include, for example, species from the genera Fragaria, Lotus, Medicago, Onobrychis, Trifolium, Trigonella, Vigna, Citrus, Linum, Geranium, Manihot, Daucus, Arabidopsis, Brassica, Raphanus, Sinapis, Atropa, Capsicum, Datura, Hyoscya us, Lycopersicon, Nicotiana, Solanum, Petunia, Digitalis, Majorana, Cichorium, Helianthus, Lactuca, Bromus, Asparagus, Antirrhinum, Hererocallis, Nemesia, Pelargonium, Panicum, Pennisetum, Ranunculus, Senecio, Salpiglossis, Cucumis, Browaalia, Glycine, Lolium, Zea, Triticum, Sorghum, Malus, Apium, Datura, and the like. Plant regeneration from cultured protoplasts is described in Evans et al., Handbook of Plant Cell Cultures, Vol. 1: (MacMillan Publishing Co. New York, 1983); and Vasil, I.R. (ed.), Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Acad. Press, Orlando, Vol. I, 1984, and Vol. Ill, 1986. It is known that practically all plants can be regenerated from cultured cells or tissues, including but not limited to, all major species of sugarcane, sugar beet, cotton, fruit trees, and legumes. Means for regeneration vary from species to species, but generally a suspension of transformed protoplasts or a petri plate containing transformed explants is first provided. Callus tissue is formed and shoots may be induced from callus and subsequently rooted. Alternatively, embryo formation can be induced employing well-known plant hormones in the callus tissue. These embryos germinate as natural embryos to form plants. The culture media will generally contain various amino acids and hormones, such as auxin and cytokinins. It is also advantageous to add glutamic acid and proline to the medium, especially for such species as corn and alfalfa. Efficient regeneration will depend on the medium, on the genotype, and on the history of the culture. If these three variables are controlled, then regeneration is usually reproducible and repeatable. With the methods of the present invention, one can generate a transgenic plant containing at least a plurality of plant-defense-associated proteins, an origin of replication from either yeast, insect or mammalian cells, and a selectable marker gene for the expression of the plant-defense-associated proteins described herein. The invention will now be described in greater detail by reference to the following non-limiting examples. EXAMPLES The nomenclature used hereafter and the laboratory procedures in recombinant DNA technology described below are those well known and commonly employed in the art. Standard techniques are used for cloning, DNA and RNA isolation, amplification and purification. Enzymatic reactions involving DNA ligase, DNA polymerase, restriction endonucleases and the like are performed according to the manufacturer's specifications. These techniques and various other techniques are generally performed according to Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning— A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., (1989) . The manual is hereinafter referred to as "Sambrook." Other general references are provided throughout this document. The procedures therein are well known in the art and are described herein for the convenience of the reader. All the information contained therein is incorporated herein by reference. Vector Preparation Construction of plasmid pBZ56 A SphI fragment of rice chitinase RCH10 gene (SEQ ID NO: 1) from plasmid pRCHIO (described in Zhu et al.. Plant J.. 3:203-212, 1993) was subcloned into pSP72 (Promega, Madison, WI) to give pBZ5B. A Sac2/Kpnl fragment of RCH10 was subcloned into pSP72 to give pBZ52. The NcoI/EcoRV fragment of pBZ52 was inserted into pBZ5B NcoI/PvuII sites to give pBZ54. The EcoRV/Bglll fragment of pBZ54 was inserted into pGEM721 BamHI/EcoRV sites to give pBZ55 [pGEM721 is a pGEM7 (Promega, Madison, WI) plasmid containing CaMV 35S promoter] . The Hpal/SacI fragment of pBZ55 was inserted into pBIlOl.l (Jefferson et al., EMBO J.. 6:3902-3907, 1987) to give pBZ56. Construction of pM42X A lambda ZAPII (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) cDNA library prepared from poly (A) RNA isolated from alfalfa suspension cells 2, 3, and 4 h after elicitation with a fungal cell wall preparation (Dalkin et al., Phvsiol. and Mol. Plant Path.. 3_7:293-307, 1990) was screened using a bean glucanase cDNA as probe (Edington et al. , Plant Mol. Biol.. i6:81-94, 1991). Positive plaques identified on duplicate filters were purified through two subsequent rounds of screening. Plasmids were then rescued in pBluescript SK- by use of the helper phage R408 (Stratagene) , and insert size and diversity determined by restriction mapping. The largest insert that hybridized to the bean glucanase probe was subcloned into pGEM- 3Zf(+) (Promega) to yield the plasmid "pAglul", which contains the entire coding region for an isoform of acidic alfalfa β-1 ,3-glucanase (SEQ ID NO: 3). A BamHI/XhoI fragment of pAglul containing an alfalfa /3-glucanase gene was inserted into pMON530 (Monsanto, St. Louis, MO) Bglll/Xhol sites to give pM4. The BamHI complete/Pstl partial digested fragment of pM4 was inserted into pSP72 (Promega) to give pM42. The PvuII/SacI fragment of pM42 fragment was inserted into the Smal/SacI site of pBI121 (Jefferson et al., EMBO J.. 6:3902-3907, 1987) to give pM42X. Construction of pBZlOO The plasmid pBZ55, described above, was digested with EcoRV/Sall, filled in with DNA polymerase Klenow fragment and religated to give pBZ55M. An Hpal/Xhol fragment of pBZ55M was inserted into pGEM7 (Promega) to give pBZ55M-7. A Sad fragment of pBZ55M-7 was inserted into pM42X to give pBZlOO. Tobacco Transformation Plasmids pBZ56 and pM42X were directly transformed in Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404, and independent transgenic tobacco plants containing either a rice chitinase or alfalfa glucanase transgene were generated by the leaf disc method (see, e.g., Rogers et al., Meth. in Enzvmol.. 118:627-640, 1986). Transformed plants were selected on Murashige and Skoog medium (see Murashige and Skoog, Physiol. Plant.15:673, 1962) containing 200 / zg/ml kanamycin and 500 μg/ l carbenicillin, and grown at 25° C under a 16 hour light (115mE)/8 hour dark cycle for several weeks. The seedlings from the transformed plants were then moved into soil. Approximately 24 pBZ56 and 20 pM42X transgenic plants were confirmed as transformants by Southern blot hybridization. Expression of rice chitinase and alfalfa- glucanase transgenes was checked by conventional Northern blot and Western blot analysis. Several F2 generation transgenic lines that expressed high levels of either one of the above transgenes were selected for mating to produce an invention transgenic plant. Preparation of transgenic tobacco plant containing multiple plant-defense-associated genes The F2 high level expression homozygous transgenic lines of pBZ56 and pM42X transformants were crossed with each other using routine methods. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was employed to confirm that the heterozygous F3 generation (i.e., crossed plants) contained both transgenes. After confirmation, the F3 generation seeds were harvested and F4 generation plants were produced. F4 generation plants that were homozygous for both the chitinase and glucanase transgenes were selected and their genotypes were confirmed by back-cross and PCR analysis. The F4 plants were used for fungal infection assays. Preparation of transgenic rice plant containing multiple plant-defense-associated genes The plasmid pBZlOO and a plasmid containing a hygromycin-resistant gene were introduced into rice embryos employing a commercially available ballistic micro-projectile device. The bombarded embryos were grown on N6 medium (see Chu et al., Scientia Sinica. 18:659-668, 1975) containing hygromycin. Regenerated hygromycin resistant plants were analyzed by PCR and Southern blot analysis for the presence of inheritable pBZlOO DNA. The results indicate that the genomic DNA of the rice transformants contain inheritable copies of both transgenes. Assay for resistance of Tobacco transgenic plants to Cercospora Nicotinae Fungal Infection Both F3 and F4 generation invention transgenic tobacco plants, described above, were subjected to the following fungal infection assay. The results are shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. Cercospora nicotianae (available from American Type Culture Collection under ATCC Nos. 18366 and 18367) were cultured by suspending mycelial fragments in sterile ddH 2 0. A tobacco leaf suspension was prepared containing 200 ml V8 juice, 3.0 g CaC0 3 , 800 ml water, pH to 6.15, 18 g agar, 1 g dried tobacco leaves (dry several large leaves in the microwave for about 10 min or 'defrost'; grind in a mortar and pestle) , and autoclaved for 20-25 minutes. Approximately 0.5-1.0 ml of the tobacco leaf suspension was spread onto a petri plate. The contents of the plate were incubated at 25° C with continuous light for about 4-6 weeks until white-ish mycelial covered the plate evenly. The F3 and F4 generations of an invention tobacco transgenic plant (approximately 100 of each) , and appropriate controls, were grown to about 5-6 weeks old. Mycelia were cut evenly into small squares (approximately 2 mm ) with a sterile scalpel. The mycelial agar squares were adhered to the underside and between the veins of tobacco leaves (not the newest leaf: usually the 2nd or 3rd from the top) using 3/4" waterproof surgical tape (Blenderm, 3M) . The plants were incubated at 20° C, for 4-10 days using a 16 hour daylength. Symptoms of fungal infection become visible in approximately 24-96 hours. Initially, small pin-pricks are just visible, with perhaps some browning of the leaf tissue over the inoculum. This progresses to a grey-ish, dry lesion of increasing diameter. The relative level of fungal infection was scored using a numerical rating system as follows: 0 - no symptoms, maybe a little browning; 1 - 'pin-pricks, ' but no contiguous, measurable lesion; >1 - (measuring the lesions, taking the widest portion as one measurement, then the perpendicular as the other; multiply these to get an approximate disease area in mm .) Figure 1 shows the results of the fungal infection assay for the F4 generation invention transgenic tobacco plants. The results indicate that the lesion sizes for the invention transgenic plant were at all times less than the lesion sizes observed for the controls, e.g., the wild type tobacco plant and the single-gene trangenic tobacco plants containing only one of either the chitinase or 3-glucanase genes. Thus, the invention transgenic plant has a higher level of resistance to lesions caused by fungal pathogens than each of the control tobacco plants. Figure 2 shows the results of the fungal infection assay for the heterozygous F3 generation invention transgenic tobacco plants. The results indicate that the infection frequency for the invention transgenic tobacco plants was essentially less than the infection frequencies observed for the controls, e.g. , the wild type tobacco plant and the single-gene trangenic tobacco plants containing only one of either the chitinase or 3-glucanase genes. Thus, the invention transgenic plant has a higher level of resistance to fungal infection caused by fungal pathogens than each of the control tobacco plants. Assay for resistance of Tobacco transgenic plants to Thanatephorus cucumeris Fungal Infection In the imperfect stage, T. cucumeris from anastomosis group 3 (such as the strain ATCC No. 62149) causes stem lesions ("sore shin") similar to the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani . However, basidiospores of the fungus form in the perfect stage. Germinating basidiospores form appressoria that penetrate tobacco leaves directly, leading to the formation of lesions ('target spot*). Factors that favor development of the perfect stage are temperatures within the range of 16-28° C and leaf wetness. T. cucumeris were cultured by inoculating autoclaved rice media (50 g Uncle Ben's Converted Rice, 25 ml doubly distilled water in 250 ml flasks; cover with foil and autoclave 25 minutes, see Shew and Main, Plant Disease. 74:1009-1013, 1990) with squares of mycelia from PDA (potato dextrose agar) plates. The plates were incubated at 22-25° C for 2-4 weeks with continuous light (the rice looks "mummified 1 —white and powdery). To inoculate the invention transgenic tobacco plant, and appropriate controls, inoculum was ground in a blender until very few rice grains remained (approximately 3 X 45 seconds, scraping down the sides in between). Starting with the 0 level, inoculum was mixed into dry potting mix at the rate of 0, 1, 2 and 5g rice mixture/liter of soil and distributed to 9-well pot forms. Eighteen 4-5 week old tobacco seedlings were transplanted to the wells, being careful to avoid carry¬ over from high inoculum levels to low ones (preferably use the wooden end of a separate disposable cotton applicator for each level to make a hole and firm the soil around the stem) . Subsequently, pot-sets were placed in a flat cover with a plastic dome and incubated at 20° C for 4-7 days using a 16 hour daylength. The dome was removed and sprinkled with water as needed to maintain moist conditions. Symptoms of fungal infection in the highest inoculum become evident in approximately 3-4 days. Leaves touching the soil become grey-ish and wilted; upper leaves wilt; stems become girdled at the soil line, brown-ish and constricted. For the results shown in Figures 3A and B, the relative level of fungal infection was scored using a numerical rating system as follows: 0 - No symptoms; 1 - A diseased leaf or wilting, but plant may survive; 2 - Severely constricted stem indicating plant will die; flat-out, wilted plant. The results of the assay at days 4 and 5 are shown in Figures 3A and 3B, respectively. Figure 3A (day 4) indicates that the invention transgenic plant designated X/3, when grown in potting soil containing 5g of the above-described fungal rice mixture/liter, has a higher level of resistance to the pathogen than the control tobacco plants which include a wild type tobacco plant and single-gene trangenic tobacco plants containing either one of the chitinase or /3-glucanase gene. Figure 3B (day 5) indicates that both the X/7 and X/3 invention transgenic tobacco plants, when grown in potting soil containing 2g and 5g of rice mixture/liter, have a higher level of resistance to the pathogen than the control tobacco plants which include a wild type tobacco plant and single-gene trangenic tobacco plants containing either one of the chitinase or β- glucanase gene. A similar assay was conducted using F5 transgenic tobacco plants that were homozygous for both the chitinase and 0-glucanase genes. In this assay 4g, 15g, and 45g of the rice mixture/liter was employed, and the plants were scored as either healthy or diseased. The results are shown in Figures 4A (4g) , 4B (15g) , and 4C (45g) . The results indicate that the invention transgenic plant containing two plant-defense-associated proteins clearly has increased resistance to fungal pathogens relative to non-transgenic plants and transgenic plants of the same species that only express one of said plant-defense-associated proteins. While the invention has been described in detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood that modifications and variations are within the spirit and scope of that which is described and claimed. SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INFORMATION: (i) APPLICANT: Lamb, Christopher J. Zhu, Qun Maher, Eileen A. Dixon, Richard A. (ii) TITLE OF INVENTION: TRANSGENIC PLANTS CONTAINING MULTIPLE DISEASE RESISTANCE GENES (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 4 (iv) CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: (A) ADDRESSEE: Pretty, Schroeder, Brueggemann & Clark (B) STREET: 444 South Flower Street, Suite 2000 (C) CITY: Los Angeles (D) STATE: CA (E) COUNTRY: U.S.A. (F) ZIP: 90071-2921 (v) COMPUTER READABLE FORM: (A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk (B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS (D) SOFTWARE: Patentin Release #1.0, Version #1.25 (vi) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: US 07/999,999 (B) FILING DATE: 15-DEC-1990 (C) CLASSIFICATION: (viii) ATTORNEY/AGENT INFORMATION: (A) NAME: Reiter, Stephen E. (B) REGISTRATION NUMBER: 31,192 (C) REFERENCE/DOCKET NUMBER: P41 9391 (ix) TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION: (A) TELEPHONE: 619-546-4737 (B) TELEFAX: 619-546-9392 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:l: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 1151 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: both (D) TOPOLOGY: both (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: cDNA (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: CDS (B) LOCATION: 55..1062 (D) OTHER INFORMATION: /product= "RICE CHITINASE" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID N0:1: AATCAGTCAA TCTGTATACA GCAACTCAGC GATCTTATAT TTACCCAACA CACC ATG 57 Met 1 AGA GCG CTC GCT GTG GTG GCC ATG GTG GCC AGG CCC TTC CTC GCG GCG 105 Arg Ala Leu Ala Val Val Ala Met Val Ala Arg Pro Phe Leu Ala Ala 5 10 15 GCC GTG CAT GCC GAG CAG TGC GGC AGC CAG GCC GGC GGC GCG GTG TGC 153 Ala Val His Ala Glu Gin Cys Gly Ser Gin Ala Gly Gly Ala Val Cys 20 25 30 CCC AAC TGC CTC TGC TGC AGC CAG TTC GGC TGG TGC GGC TCC ACC TCC 201 Pro Asn Cys Leu Cys Cys Ser Gin Phe Gly Trp Cys Gly Ser Thr Ser 35 40 45 GAC TAC TGC GGC GCC GGA TGC CAG AGC CAG TGC TCG CGG CTG CGG CGG 249 Asp Tyr Cys Gly Ala Gly Cys Gin Ser Gin Cys Ser Arg Leu Arg Arg 50 55 60 65 CGG CGG CCC GAC GCG TCC GGC GGC GGT GGC AGC GGC GTC GCG TCC ATC 297 Arg Arg Pro Asp Ala Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Gly Val Ala Ser lie 70 75 80 GTG TCG CGC TCG CTC TTC GAC CTG ATG CTG CTC CAC CGC AAC GAT GCG 345 Val Ser Arg Ser Leu Phe Asp Leu Met Leu Leu His Arg Asn Asp Ala 85 90 95 GCG TGC CCG GCC AGC AAC TTC TAC ACC TAC GAC GCC TTC GTC GCC GCC 393 Ala Cys Pro Ala Ser Asn Phe Tyr Thr Tyr Asp Ala Phe Val Ala Ala 100 105 110 GCC AGC GCC TTC CCG GGC TTC GCC GCC GCG GGC GAC GCC GAC ACC AAC 441 Ala Ser Ala Phe Pro Gly Phe Ala Ala Ala Gly Asp Ala Asp Thr Asn 115 120 125 AAG CGC GAG GTC GCC GCG TTC CTT GCG CAG ACG TCC CAC GAG ACC ACC 489 Lys Arg Glu Val Ala Ala Phe Leu Ala Gin Thr Ser His Glu Thr Thr 130 135 140 145 GGC GGG TGG GCG ACG GCG CCC GAC GGC CCC TAC ACG TGG GGC TAC TGC 537 Gly Gly Trp Ala Thr Ala Pro Asp Gly Pro Tyr Thr Trp Gly Tyr Cys 150 155 160 TTC AAG GAG GAG AAC GGC GGC GCC GGG CCG GAC TAC TGC CAG CAG AGC 585 Phe Lys Glu Glu Asn Gly Gly Ala Gly Pro Asp Tyr Cys Gin Gin Ser 165 170 175 GCG CAG TGG CCG TGC GCC GCC GGC AAG AAG TAC TAC GGC CGG GGT CCC 633 Ala Gin Trp Pro Cys Ala Ala Gly Lys Lys Tyr Tyr Gly Arg Gly Pro 180 185 190 ATC CAG CTC TCC TAC AAC TTC AAC TAC GGG CCG GCG GGG CAG GCC ATC 681 lie Gin Leu Ser Tyr Asn Phe Asn Tyr Gly Pro Ala Gly Gin Ala lie 195 200 205 GGC GCC GAC CTG CTC GGC GAC CCG GAC CTC GTG GCG TCT GAC GCC ACC 729 Gly Ala Asp Leu Leu Gly Asp Pro Asp Leu Val Ala Ser Asp Ala Thr 210 215 220 225 GTC TCC TTC GAC ACG GCC TTC TGG TTC TGG ATG ACG CCG CAG TCG CCC 777 Val Ser Phe Asp Thr Ala Phe Trp Phe Trp Met Thr Pro Gin Ser Pro 230 235 240 AAG CCG TCG TGC AAC GCG GTC GCC ACC GGC CAG TGG ACG CCC TCC GCC 825 Lys Pro Ser Cys Asn Ala Val Ala Thr Gly Gin Trp Thr Pro Ser Ala 245 250 255 GAC GAC CAG CGG GCG GGC CGC GTG CCG GGC TAC GGC GTC ATC ACC AAC 873 Asp Asp Gin Arg Ala Gly Arg Val Pro Gly Tyr Gly Val He Thr Asn 260 265 270 ATC ATC AAC GGC GGG CTG GAG TGC GGC CAT GGC GAG GAC GAT CGC ATC 921 He He Asn Gly Gly Leu Glu Cys Gly His Gly Glu Asp Asp Arg He 275 280 285 GCC GAC CGG ATC GGC TTC TAC AAG CGC TAC TGC GAC ATC CTC GGC GTC 969 Ala Asp Arg He Gly Phe Tyr Lys Arg Tyr Cys Asp He Leu Gly Val 290 295 300 305 AGC TAC GGC GCC AAC TTG GAT TGC TAC AGC CAG AGG CCT TCG GCT CCT 1017 Ser Tyr Gly Ala Asn Leu Asp Cys Tyr Ser Gin Arg Pro Ser Ala Pro 310 315 320 CCT AAG CTT CGC CTA CCT AGC TTC CAC ACA GTG ATA AAT AAT CAC 1062 Pro Lys Leu Arg Leu Pro Ser Phe His Thr Val He Asn Asn His 325 330 335 TGATGGAGTA TAGTTTACAC CATATCGATG AATAAAACTT GATCCGAATT CTCGCCCTAT 1122 AGTGAGTCGT ATTAGTCGAC AGCTCTAGA 1151 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 336 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2: Met Arg Ala Leu Ala Val Val Ala Met Val Ala Arg Pro Phe Leu Ala 1 5 10 15 Ala Ala Val His Ala Glu Gin Cys Gly Ser Gin Ala Gly Gly Ala Val 20 25 30 Cys Pro Asn Cys Leu Cys Cys Ser Gin Phe Gly Trp Cys Gly Ser Thr 35 40 45 Ser Asp Tyr Cys Gly Ala Gly Cys Gin Ser Gin Cys Ser Arg Leu Arg 50 55 60 Arg Arg Arg Pro Asp Ala Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Gly Val Ala Ser 65 70 75 80 He Val Ser Arg Ser Leu Phe Asp Leu Met Leu Leu His Arg Asn Asp 85 90 95 Ala Ala Cys Pro Ala Ser Asn Phe Tyr Thr Tyr Asp Ala Phe Val Ala 100 105 110 Ala Ala Ser Ala Phe Pro Gly Phe Ala Ala Ala Gly Asp Ala Asp Thr 115 120 125 Asn Lys Arg Glu Val Ala Ala Phe Leu Ala Gin Thr Ser His Glu Thr 130 135 140 Thr Gly Gly Trp Ala Thr Ala Pro Asp Gly Pro Tyr Thr Trp Gly Tyr 145 150 155 160 Cys Phe Lys Glu Glu Asn Gly Gly Ala Gly Pro Asp Tyr Cys Gin Gin 165 170 175 Ser Ala Gin Trp Pro Cys Ala Ala Gly Lys Lys Tyr Tyr Gly Arg Gly 180 185 190 Pro He Gin Leu Ser Tyr Asn Phe Asn Tyr Gly Pro Ala Gly Gin Ala 195 200 205 He Gly Ala Asp Leu Leu Gly Asp Pro Asp Leu Val Ala Ser Asp Ala 210 215 220 Thr Val Ser Phe Asp Thr Ala Phe Trp Phe Trp Met Thr Pro Gin Ser 225 230 235 240 Pro Lys Pro Ser Cys Asn Ala Val Ala Thr Gly Gin Trp Thr Pro Ser 245 250 255 Ala Asp Asp Gin Arg Ala Gly Arg Val Pro Gly Tyr Gly Val He Thr 260 265 270 Asn He He Asn Gly Gly Leu Glu Cys Gly His Gly Glu Asp Asp Arg 275 280 285 He Ala Asp Arg He Gly Phe Tyr Lys Arg Tyr Cys Asp He Leu Gly 290 295 300 Val Ser Tyr Gly Ala Asn Leu Asp Cys Tyr Ser Gin Arg Pro Ser Ala 305 310 315 320 Pro Pro Lys Leu Arg Leu Pro Ser Phe His Thr Val He Asn Asn His 325 330 335 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:3: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 1374 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: both (D) TOPOLOGY: both (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: cDNA (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: CDS (B) LOCATION: 52..1158 (D) OTHER INFORMATION: /product= "ALFALFA BETA-GLUCANASE" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:3: CGGCAAATCC TTCTTTCATA TTCATTTTTA GTGTATACTT TATTTTGCAT C ATG CCT 57 Met Pro 1 TCT TTC TTT GCT CCA ACC AGG AGG TTC TCC TTG GCT TCT CCT CTC CTT 105 Ser Phe Phe Ala Pro Thr Arg Arg Phe Ser Leu Ala Ser Pro Leu Leu 5 . 10 15 CTA TTG GGA TTG TTC ACA ATA AAC CTC ATT CCC ACA GCA GAT GCT CAA 153 Leu Leu Gly Leu Phe Thr He Asn Leu He Pro Thr Ala Asp Ala Gin 20 25 30 ATA GGA GTA TGT TAT GGT ATG ATG GGA AAC AAT CTA CCA CCA GCA AAC 201 He Gly Val Cys Tyr Gly Met Met Gly Asn Asn Leu Pro Pro Ala Asn 35 40 45 50 GAA GTT ATA GAT CTC TAC AAA GCA AAC AAC ATT AAG AGA ATG AGA CTC 249 Glu Val He Asp Leu Tyr Lys Ala Asn Asn He Lys Arg Met Arg Leu 55 60 65 TAT GAT CCT AAT CAA GCT GCT CTA AAT GCA TTA AGA AAT TCA GGC ATT 297 Tyr Asp Pro Asn Gin Ala Ala Leu Asn Ala Leu Arg Asn Ser Gly He 70 75 80 GAA CTC ATT CTT GGT GTG CCT AAT TCC GAC CTT CAA AGC CTA GCC ACC 345 Glu Leu He Leu Gly Val Pro Asn Ser Asp Leu Gin Ser Leu Ala Thr 85 90 95 AAC TCT GAT AAT GCA CGT CAA TGG GTA CAA AGA AAT GTA TTG AAT TTC 393 Asn Ser Asp Asn Ala Arg Gin Trp Val Gin Arg Asn Val Leu Asn Phe 100 105 110 TGG CCT AGT GTC AAA ATC AAG TAT ATT GCA GTT GGT AAT GAA GTG AGT 441 Trp Pro Ser Val Lys He Lys Tyr He Ala Val Gly Asn Glu Val Ser 115 120 125 130 CCA GTT GGA GGT TCT TCT TGG CTA GGA CAA TAT GTT TTA CCT GCC ACC 489 Pro Val Gly Gly Ser Ser Trp Leu Gly Gin Tyr Val Leu Pro Ala Thr 135 140 145 CAA AAT ATA TAT CAA GCT ATA AGA GCT AAA AAT CTT CAT GAT CAA ATC 537 Gin Asn He Tyr Gin Ala He Arg Ala Lys Asn Leu His Asp Gin He 150 155 160 TTG GTT TCA ACC GCT ATT GAC ATG ACC CTT ATT GGA AAC TCA TTC CCT 585 Leu Val Ser Thr Ala He Asp Met Thr Leu He Gly Asn Ser Phe Pro 165 170 175 CCA TCT AAA GGT TCT TTC AGA AAT GAT GTT AGG GCA TAC CTA GAT CCT 633 Pro Ser Lys Gly Ser Phe Arg Asn Asp Val Arg Ala Tyr Leu Asp Pro 180 185 190 TTT ATT GGA TAC TTG GTA TAT GCA GGT GCA CCT TTA CTT GTC AAT GTT 681 Phe He Gly Tyr Leu Val Tyr Ala Gly Ala Pro Leu Leu Val Asn Val 195 200 205 210 TAC CCT TAT TTT AGC CAT GTT GGT AAC CCG CGC GAC ATA TCT CTT CCT 729 Tyr Pro Tyr Phe Ser His Val Gly Asn Pro Arg Asp He Ser Leu Pro 215 220 225 TAT GCT CTT TTC ACT TCA CCG GGT GTT ATG GTA CAA GAC GGT CCA AAT 777 Tyr Ala Leu Phe Thr Ser Pro Gly Val Met Val Gin Asp Gly Pro Asn 230 235 240 GGG TAC CAA AAC TTG TTT GAT GCT ATG TTG GAT TCG GTG CAT GCA GCC 825 Gly Tyr Gin Asn Leu Phe Asp Ala Met Leu Asp Ser Val His Ala Ala 245 250 255 CTA GAT AAC ACT GGG ATT GGT TGG GTG AAC GTT GTT GTA TCT GAG AGT 873 Leu Asp Asn Thr Gly He Gly Trp Val Asn Val Val Val Ser Glu Ser 260 265 270 GGT TGG CCC TCT GAT GGA GGC GCT ACT TCA TAT GAC AAC GCA CGT ATT 921 Gly Trp Pro Ser Asp Gly Gly Ala Thr Ser Tyr Asp Asn Ala Arg He 275 280 285 290 TAT CTT GAT AAT TTG ATT CGT TAT GAA GGT AAA GGT ACT CCA AGA AGG 969 Tyr Leu Asp Asn Leu He Arg Tyr Glu Gly Lys Gly Thr Pro Arg Arg 295 300 305 CCT TGG GCT ACA GAA ACT TAT ATT TTT GCT ATG TTT GAT GAG AAC CAA 1017 Pro Trp Ala Thr Glu Thr Tyr He Phe Ala Met Phe Asp Glu Asn Gin 310 315 320 AAG AGT CCA GAA TTG GAG AAA CAT TTT GGA GTG TTT TAT CCT AAT AAA 1065 Lys Ser Pro Glu Leu Glu Lys His Phe Gly Val Phe Tyr Pro Asn Lys 325 330 335 CAA AAG AAG TAC CCA TTT GGA TTT GGT GGG GAA AGA ATG GGA ATT GTC 1113 Gin Lys Lys Tyr Pro Phe Gly Phe Gly Gly Glu Arg Met Gly He Val 340 345 350 AAT GGT GAC TTC AAT GCA ACT ATT TCT CTT AAG AGT GAC ATG TAAGAAAAAA 1165 Asn Gly Asp Phe Asn Ala Thr He Ser Leu Lys Ser Asp Met 355 360 365 ATCAAGGTTT TCAAGATTTG AGTGGTTTTA TGCATAAAAT AAGAGAATTT CTCGTGTATG " 1225 TATTTTATTT ATCTTTCTTT TTTCGGGTGT AGAAAATTTG GAATGCTTGA GTTTCCTATT 1285 TCTCTAAAAA TTAATGTCTT GTGATGAAGT TATATGAATA TTTATATAAA GCGTAACTTT 1345 CCAAATTATT TAATACTATT TTTCAAAAA 1374 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID N0:4: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 368 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID N0:4: Met Pro Ser Phe Phe Ala Pro Thr Arg Arg Phe Ser Leu Ala Ser Pro 1 5 10 15 Leu Leu Leu Leu Gly Leu Phe Thr He Asn Leu He Pro Thr Ala Asp 20 25 30 Ala Gin He Gly Val Cys Tyr Gly Met Met Gly Asn Asn Leu Pro Pro 35 40 45 Ala Asn Glu Val He Asp Leu Tyr Lys Ala Asn Asn He Lys Arg Met 50 55 60 Arg Leu Tyr Asp Pro Asn Gin Ala Ala Leu Asn Ala Leu Arg Asn Ser 65 70 75 80 Gly He Glu Leu He Leu Gly Val Pro Asn Ser Asp Leu Gin Ser Leu 85 90 95 Ala Thr Asn Ser Asp Asn Ala Arg Gin Trp Val Gin Arg Asn Val Leu 100 105 110 Asn Phe Trp Pro Ser Val Lys He Lys Tyr He Ala Val Gly Asn Glu 115 120 125 Val Ser Pro Val Gly Gly Ser Ser Trp Leu Gly Gin Tyr Val Leu Pro 130 135 140 Ala Thr Gin Asn He Tyr Gin Ala He Arg Ala Lys Asn Leu His Asp 145 150 155 160 Gin He Leu Val Ser Thr Ala He Asp Met Thr Leu He Gly Asn Ser 165 170 175 Phe Pro Pro Ser Lys Gly Ser Phe Arg Asn Asp Val Arg Ala Tyr Leu 180 185 190 Asp Pro Phe He Gly Tyr Leu Val Tyr Ala Gly Ala Pro Leu Leu Val 195 200 205 Asn Val Tyr Pro Tyr Phe Ser His Val Gly Asn Pro Arg Asp He Ser 210 215 220 Leu Pro Tyr Ala Leu Phe Thr Ser Pro Gly Val Met Val Gin Asp Gly 225 230 235 240 Pro Asn Gly Tyr Gin Asn Leu Phe Asp Ala Met Leu Asp Ser Val His 245 250 255 Ala Ala Leu Asp Asn Thr Gly He Gly Trp Val Asn Val Val Val Ser 260 265 270 Glu Ser Gly Trp Pro Ser Asp Gly Gly Ala Thr Ser Tyr Asp Asn Ala 275 280 285 Arg He Tyr Leu Asp Asn Leu He Arg Tyr Glu Gly Lys Gly Thr Pro 290 295 300 Arg Arg Pro Trp Ala Thr Glu Thr Tyr He Phe Ala Met Phe Asp Glu 305 310 315 320 Asn Gin Lys Ser Pro Glu Leu Glu Lys His Phe Gly Val Phe Tyr Pro 325 330 335 Asn Lys Gin Lys Lys Tyr Pro Phe Gly Phe Gly Gly Glu Arg Met Gly 340 345 350 He Val Asn Gly Asp Phe Asn Ala Thr He Ser Leu Lys Ser Asp Met 355 360 365

Claims: That which is claimed is: 1. A transgenic plant comprising: a plurality of transgenes, wherein each transgene encodes a plant-defense-associated protein. 2. A plant according to Claim 1, wherein said plant-defense-associated proteins are expressed as biologically active proteins. 3. A plant according to Claim 1, wherein each of said transgenes is operatively linked to a promoter sequence, such that said plant-defense-associated proteins are constitutively expressed. 4. A plant according to Claim 1, wherein at least one of said transgenes is exogenous to said plant. 5. A plant according to Claim 1, wherein at least one of said plant-defense-associated proteins is a lytic enzyme. 6. A plant according to Claim 1, wherein both of said plant-defense-associated proteins are lytic enzymes. 7. A plant according to Claim 5, wherein said lytic enzyme is chitinase. 8. A plant according to Claim 7, wherein said chitinase is rice chitinase. 9. A plant according to Claim 6, wherein one of said lytic enzymes is glucanase. 10. A plant according to Claim 9, wherein said glucanase is alfalfa glucanase. 11. A plant according to Claim 1, wherein said plant has increased resistance to fungal pathogens relative to non-transgenic plants of the same species. 12. A plant according to Claim 1, wherein said plant has increased resistance to fungal pathogens relative to transgenic plants of the same species that only express one of said transgenes. 13. A plant according to Claim 12, wherein said increased resistance is synergistic. 14. A plant according to Claim 1, wherein said plant is a monocot. 15. A monocot plant according to Claim 14, wherein said plant is selected from: barley, wheat, maize, oat, rice, sorgham. 16. A monocot plant according to Claim 15, wherein said plant is a rice plant. 17. A plant according to Claim 1, wherein said plant is a dicot. 18. A dicot plant according to Claim 17, wherein said plant is selected from: tomato, tobacco, potato, bean, and soybean. 19. A dicot plant according to Claim 18, wherein said plant is a tobacco plant. 20. A transgenic plant comprising: a first exogenous transgene encoding an overexpressed and biologically active rice chitinase protein; and a second exogenous transgene encoding an overexpressed and biologically active alfalfa glucanase protein, wherein: said transgenes are constitutively expressed, and said plant has increased resistance to fungal pathogens relative to plants that do not constitutively express both of said transgenes. 21. A plant according to Claim 20, wherein said plant is a tobacco plant. 22. A nucleic acid construct comprising: a first transgene encoding a first plant-defense-associated protein; and a second transgene encoding a second plant-defense-associated protein, and wherein each of said transgenes are operatively linked to a promoter. 23. A construct according to Claim 22, wherein said promoter is a constitutive promoter. 24. A construct according to Claim 22, wherein said first plant-defense-associated protein is a chitinase protein. 25. A construct according to Claim 24, wherein said chitinase protein is rice chitinase. 26. A construct according to Claim 22, wherein said second plant-defense-associated protein is a glucanase protein. 27. A construct according to Claim 26, wherein said glucanase protein is alfalfa glucanase. 28. A construct according to Claim 22, wherein said construct imparts to transgenic plants containing same, increased resistance to fungal pathogens relative to non-transgenic plants of the same species that do not contain said construct. 29. A vector comprising the construct of Claim 22. 30. A plant cell containing the vector of Claim 29. 31. A method to increase disease resistance of a plant, said method comprising: introducing the nucleic acid construct of Claim 22 into the genome of said plant. 32. A method to increase disease resistance of a transgenic plant containing a first heterologous plant- defense-associated transgene, said method comprising: introducing a second transgene encoding a second plant-defense-associated protein into the genome of said plant, wherein said second transgene is different from said first heterologous plant-defense-associated transgene.

Inventors: DIXON RICHARD A, LAMB CHRISTOPHER J, MAHER EILEEN A, ZHU QUN, DIXON, RICHARD, A., LAMB, CHRISTOPHER, J., MAHER, EILEEN, A., ZHU, QUN
Applicants: SALK INST FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDI, THE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES
Application year: 1994
Main classification: A01H1
IPC codes: A01H5, C12N5, C12N9, C12N15