Use of a progesterone receptor antagonist for preventing or inhibiting fertilization

Abstract: The use of a progesterone receptor antagonist for the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for preventing an oocyte from becoming fertilized without preventing ovulation or interfering with the regularity of the ovarian menstrual cycle of a mammal.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The ovarian/menstrual cycle is a complex event characterized by two distinct phases, namely the estrogen rich follicular phase and, after ovulation, the progesterone rich luteal phase. Each has a duration of approximately 14 days resulting in an intermenstrual interval of about 28 days. The endometrial tissue responds to the changes in hormonal milieu. The onset of menstruation is the begining of a new menstrual cycle and is counted as day 1. During a span of about 5 to 7 days, the superficial layers of the endometrium, which grew and developed during the antecedent ovarian/menstrual cycle, are sloughed because demise of the corpus luteum in the non-fertile menstrual cycle is associated with a loss of progesterone secretion. Ovarian follicular maturation occurs progressively resulting in a rise in the circulating levels of estrogen, which in turn leads to new endometrial proliferation (i.e. mitogenesis induced by the estrogen), predominantly during the second week of follicular maturation. The dominant ovarian follicle undergoes ovulation at mid-cycle, generally between menstrual cycle days 12 to 16. The follicle is converted from a predominantly estrogen source to a predominantly progesterone source (the corpus luteum). Ovulation occurs when the oocyte is potentially competent to achieve fertilization, subsequent development and implantation as an embryo. The increasing level of progesterone in the blood converts the proliferative endometrium to a secretory phase in which the tissue proliferation has promptly abated, leading to the formation of endometrial glands or organs. When the ovulated oocyte is viably fertilized and continues its progressive embryonic cleavage, the secretory endometrium and the conceptus can interact to bring about implantation (nidation), beginning about 6 to 8 days after fertilization. If an ongoing pregnancy is to be established via implantation, the embryo will attach and burrow into the secretory endometrium and begin to produce human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). The hCG in turn stimulates extended corpus luteum function, i.e. the progesterone production remains elevated, and menses does not occur in the fertile menstrual cycle. Pregnancy is then established. Pregnancy may not occur for a variety of reasons including, inter alia, absence of competent sperm, lack of fertilization despite exposure of the oocyte to sperm, lack of a competent embryo to achieve implantation, lack of competent endometrium to support implantation, and ineffective subsequent events of placentation and fetal development. In the non-fertile menstrual cycle, the waning level of progesterone in the blood causes the endometrial tissue to be sloughed. This starts a subsequent menstrual cycle. Because endometrial proliferation serves to prepare the uterus for an impending pregnancy, manipulation of hormones and of the uterine environment can provide contraception. For example, estrogens are known to decrease follicle stimulating hormone secretion by feedback inhibition. Under certain circumstances, estrogens can also inhibit luteinizing hormone secretion, once again by negative feedback. Under normal circumstances, the spike of circulating estrogen found just prior to ovulation induces the surge of gonadotropic hormones that occurs just prior to and resulting in ovulation. High doses of estrogen immediately post-coitally also can prevent conception probably due to interference with implantation. Progestins can also provide contraception. Endogenous progesterone after estrogen is responsible for the progestational changes of the endometrium and the cyclic changes of cells and tissue in the cervix and the vagina. Administration of progestin makes the cervical mucus thick, tenacious and cellular which is believed to impede spermatozoal transport. Administration of progestin also inhibits luteinizing hormone secretion and blocks ovulation in humans. The most prevalent form of oral contraception is a pill that combines both an estrogen and a progestin, a so-called combined oral contraceptive preparation. Apparently, the progestin acts to block gonadotropin release; the estrogen component provides endometrial control to diminish breakthrough bleeding.' Alternatively, there are contraceptive preparations that comprise progestin only. However, the progestin-only preparations have a more varied spectrum of side effects than do the combined preparations, especially more breakthrough bleeding. As a result, the combined preparations are the preferred oral contraceptives in use today (Sheth et al., Contraception 25:243, 1982). Antiprogestins (sometimes termed "progesterone antagonists" or "anti-gestagens") are a class of materials that block the progesterone receptor. For example, mifepristone (RU 486) is a progesterone receptor antagonist. RU 486 binds to the progesterone receptor and produces a blockade of the binding of progesterone to its receptor. When administered in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, RU 486 induces vaginal bleeding. Unlike the invention described herein, the prior art has demonstrated either inhibition of the ovulatory menstrual cycle or delayed endometrial maturation. It has been demonstrated in primate models that both a single injection of the antiprogestin RU 486 (5 mg/kg, IM) in the late follicular phase or a once weekly oral RU 486 dose of 25 mg prevented ovulation (Collins et al., J. Clin. Endocrinol . Metab. 1986, 63:1270-1276; Danforth et al., Contraception 1989, 40:195-200). Using various study protocols which differed in regimen and dose, it has been demonstrated by several groups of investigators that RU 486 inhibits ovulation in women as well (Shoupe et al., Am. J. Obstet . Gynecol. 1987 , 157:1421-1426; Liu et al., J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1987, 65:1135-1140; Luukkainen et al., Fertil. steril. 1988, 49:961-963). That RU 486 in low dose administration may exhibit an anti-implantation effect in women has been postulated (Spitz et al., The Endocrinology 1993 , 3:1, 58 et seq.). Others have demonstrated an influence of RU 486 on endometrial histology, including delayed endometrial maturation (Batista et al., Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1992, 167:60-65). Roh SI et al., Am. J. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988 ,159: 1584-1589 describes the use of antiprogesterone RU 486 to evaluate the possible role of progesterone in ovum maturation, ovulation, fertilization, and embryo cleavage. Periowlatory RU 486 injections had no effect on ovulation, fertilization, or first cleavage division, suggesting that progesterone does not have an obligatory role in these processes. Roussel U., Contraception, 1989, 40: 195-200 describes that administration of RU 486 during the follicular/proliferative phase causes anovulation and amenorrhea and that a single treatment in the late follicular phase blocks the preovulator LH surge and ovulation; mid-luteal phase administration of RU 486 can cause premature luteolysis. US-A-3 890 356, 1975, describes novel steroids of the class of 7-alkyl-3,5-unsaturated steroids useful as anti-progestational agents. The administration of the antiprogestational agents throughout the normal mammalian menstrual cycle results in a desynchronization of the maturing uterine mucosa relative to the ovulation process, thereby preventing nidation or implantation of the fertilized ovum. The invention described herein, which is distinct from the prior art, is based on the inhibition of gamete maturation and the fertilization process. Prior art has not demonstrated any such contraceptive effect. The inventor has discovered that a sufficiently low dose administration of a progesterone receptor antagonist functions as a contraceptive, but not based on an anti-nidatory effect. Rather, maturation and/or fertilization of the oocyte is prevented and/or inhibited, unrelated to whether implantation could occur. It is, accordingly, the object of this invention to provide a new use for preventing or inhibiting normal oocyte fertilization without inhibiting ovulation of a mammal, especially primates. This and other objects of the invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in this art from the following description. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING The sole figure shows the patterns of serum estradiol and progesterone realized in Example 1 below. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION This invention broadly relates to the use of a progesterone receptor antagonist for preventing an oocyte from becoming fertilized without preventing ovulation or interfering with the regularity of the ovarian menstrual cycle of a mammal. In a further aspect, the invention relates to the use of a progesterone receptor antagonist for the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition being administered within an inert matrix which is implanted within the body of a mammal for preventing an oocyte from becoming fertilized without preventing ovulation or interfering with the regularity of the ovarian menstrual cycle of a mammal. DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, a quantity of a progesterone receptor antagonist which is insufficient to interfere with the regularity of the individual ovulatory menstrual cycle of a mammal is administered to that mammal. Some minor changes in the cycle may be observed, for instance the cycle length may increase and endometrial maturation may, or may not, be delayed. As used herein, the term "regularity" means the maintained of spontaneous menstruation at periodic intervals. When the amount of the progesterone receptor antagonist is sufficiently large, ovulation is prevented and such an amount is not used in the present invention. As a result of the sufficiently low dose administration regimen of the progesterone receptor antagonist maturation and/or fertilization of the oocyte is prevented or inhibited in the present invention. This amount is hereinafter referred to as a "fertilizing inhibitory amount". The antiprogestin according to the present invention is a progesterone receptor antagonist. For example, RU 486 is particularly suitable in the practice of this invention. Examples of progesterone receptor antagonists which can be employed in this invention are RU 486 ("mifepristone", Roussel Uclaf, Paris; U.S. patent 4,386,085); and "onapristone" (Schering Ag, Berlin; U.S. patent 4,780,461) and the steroids described in the following patents and patent applications: U.S. Patent 4,609,651, especially the compound lilopristone (11B-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)-17B-hydroxy-17α-(3-hydroxy-prop-1-(Z)-enzyl-4,9(10) estradien-3-one); U.S. application Serial No. 06/827,050, especially the compounds 11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-17β-hydroxy-17a-(1-propinyl)-4,9-estradien-3-one and 11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-17β-hydroxy-17α-(3-hydroxy-1(2)-propenyl)-4,9-estradien-3-one; U.S. application Serial No. 07/283,632; published European patent application EP-A 04042831; and other antigestations, e.g., U.S. Patent 4,891,368 The progesterone receptor antagonist can be administered by way of any art recognized means as practiced in the pharmaceutical arts. For example, a suitable progesterone receptor antagonist may be so formulated so that it can be administered orally, via a skin patch for transdermal absorption, contained within an inert matrix which is implanted within the body and in the depot state in a matrix that slowly releases progesterone receptor antagonist (such implants are taught in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,957,119 and 5,088,505 and the like). Pharmaceutical formulations containing the progesterone receptor antagonist a suitable carrier can be solid dosage forms which includes tablets, capsules, cachets, pellets, pills, powders or granules; topical dosage forms which includes solutions, powders, fluid emulsions, fluid suspensions, semi-solids, ointments, pastes, creams, gels or jellies and foams; and parenteral dosage forms which includes solutions, suspensions, emulsions or dry powder comprising an effective amount of progesterone receptor antagonist as taught in this invention. It is known in the art that the active ingredient, the progesterone receptor antagonist can be contained in such formulations in addition to pharmaceutically acceptable diluents, fillers, disintegrants, binders, lubricants, surfactants, hydrophobic vehicles, water soluble vehicles, emulsifiers, buffers, humectants, moisturizers, solubilizers, preservatives and the like. The means and methods for administration are known in the art and an artisan can refer to various pharmacologic references for guidance. For example, "Modern Pharmaceutics", Banker & Rhodes, Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1979; "Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmaceutical Basis of Therapeutics", 6th Edition, MacMillan Publishing Co., New York 1980 can be consulted. The pharmaceutical formulations may be provided in kit form containing at least about 20, and preferably about 28 tablets, intended for ingestion on successive days of the menstrual cycle. Where administration of the progesterone receptor antagonist is intended to be periodic, a plurality, generally at least three, of non-adjacent tablets contain the progesterone receptor antagonist while the remaining tablets are placebo. Where administration is intended to be daily, generally at least about 20 of the tablets contain the progesterone receptor antagonist. The inhibitory effective amount of a progesterone receptor antagonist in the practice of this invention can be determined using art-recognized methods, for example, by establishing dose-response curves in suitable primate models and extrapolating to humans, extrapolating from suitable in vitro systems or by determining effectiveness in clinical trials. The dosage range will be between the least amount necessary to inhibit fertilization and the greatest amount which will not prevent ovulation or otherwise interfere with the regularity of the mammal's menstrual cycle. The determination of an effective dose is a routine exercise in the pharmaceutical arts. The artisan will take into account various physical parameters of the prospective host such as weight, age and the like. In like vein, the dosage regimen of the preparation is determinable using art-recognized methods such as establishing a dose response curve in similar primate models or in a suitable in vitro experimental system or by an empirical determination in clinical trials. The administration of the progesterone receptor antagonist can either be periodic such as on a weekly basis or continuous, that is on a daily basis. A continuous daily administration is preferred not because of demonstrated efficiency of action but rather for compliancy; individuals are more likely to follow the treatment regimen and not to forget or overlook a periodic administration schedule. In the case of the progesterone receptor antagonist RU 486, a suitable human oral dose will be on the order of about 0.01 to 1 mg per dose daily, preferably about 0.05 to 0.5 mg per dose daily. This amount can be lowered or raised based on the administration regimen and based on the characteristics of the individual receiving the treatment. With other progesterone receptor antagonists different milligram dose amounts may be appropriate depending on potency, mode of administration and the like factors. Variations of dosage based on the route of administration may vary and such changes can be determined practicing known techniques. Without being limited to theory, practice of the present invention inhibits maturation and/or fertilization of the oocyte. This may be the result of incomplete or inadequate activation of the oocyte, inadequate association of the oocyte with competent sperm, inadequate embyro cleavage, inadequate gamete interaction, alteration of gamete transport or failure of implantation due to incompetence of the oocyte or the embyro thereof, or a combination of one or more of the forergoing. Whatever the mechanism involved, normal fertilization (i.e. where the oocyte undergoes progressive embryonic cleavage sufficient to successfully complete implantation and continued embryonic cleavage thereafter) does not occur. Additionally, while a characteristic of the active agent of this invention is that it is progesterone receptor antagonist, a different common characteristic of these agents may be responsible for the fertilizion inhibitory effect. In order to further illustrate the present invention, specific examples are set forth below. It will be appreciated, however, that these examples are illustrative only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. EXAMPLE 1 For the purposes of this study, the anti-progestin selected was RU 486 and this was administered in doses of 12.5 mg once weekly to female monkeys, which are recognized to be a suitable model for human research. The end points in this study were the serum levels of estradiol and progesterone, the timeliness and duration of menses, the presence or absence of pregnancy after timed coital exposures and the determination of whether the oocytes ovulated became fertilized during the drug treatment cycles. The study was carried out at the Eastern Virginia Medical School which maintains a fully accredited animal research facility which complies through its animal care and use committee with the review standards set forth in the National Institute of Health's "Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals", the Public Health Services' "Principles for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals", and the United States Department of Agriculture's Implementation Regulations of the 1985 Amendments for the Animal Welfare Act. Tablets containing the antiprogestin were administered orally (by gavage) on the third, tenth, seventeenth and twenty-fourth day after the onset of menses. Menses and/or breakthrough bleeding were monitored by daily vaginal swabs. In the first stage of the study, 9 normal adult female monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) and two proven breeder males were studied over the course of seven consecutive menstrual cycles. The initial cycle was the qualification for acceptance into the protocol based on apparent ovulation. This was followed by three consecutive cycles where treatment by the antiprogestin was conducted and followed by three post-treatment recovery cycles. All of the females were caged with a fertile male on cycle days 13 through 18 and mating was confirmed by the presence of semen plugs in the vagina. Femoral blood was collected on alternate days throughout the initial control cycle and treatment cycle two and was otherwise collected on cycle day 23 to measure progesterone (> 2 ng/ml) as a marker of apparent ovulation. The Figure shows the control patterns of serum estradiol and progesterone in the control cycle in the lower panel and in treatment cycle 2 in the upper panel. It will be seen that despite a slight temporal distortion of the cycle, i.e., a shift to the right in the follicular phase, these endocrine parameters suggest that ovulation did occur. The serum levels of ovarian steroids are in the normal range. However, the duration of menses was shorter when the females were receiving the once weekly antiprogestin as compared to the control cycles, 1.7 + 0.9 as opposed to 4.9 + 1.0 days (p < 0.05), respectively. Breakthrough bleeding remained incidental in all cycles and was not a differential factor. Table I below summarizes pertinent observations: RESPONSE OF THE OVARIAN/MENSTRUAL CYCLE TO WEEKLY LOW DOSE ANTI-PROGESTIN WITH EXPOSURE FOR CONCEPTION Days (X + SEM) Cycle Group N Menses Follicular Phase Apparent Ovulation Luteal Phase Cycle Length Cumulative Pregnancies Control 9 4.1±1.0 13.6±2.2 9/9 15.2±2.1 28.3±2.7 - Treatment Cycle -1 9 2.0±0.4 17.4±4.0 9/9 14.9±1.7 33.5±4.1 0/9 Treatment Cycle-2 9 1.7±0.9 18.7±5.5 9/9 16.2±2.5 35.7±3.0 0/9 Treatment Cycle-3 9 1.9±1.1 17.9±4.4 7/9 15.0±1.2 34.5±4.9 0/9 Recovery Cycle-1 9 2.1±0.7 15.0±2.8 8/9 15.7±2.7 30.1±4.2 2/9 Recovery Cycle-2 9 3.7±1.2 13.2±3.1 6/7 14.8±3.3 28.1±3.3 5/9 Recovery Cycle-3 8 3.6±0.8 14.1±2.6 2/3 15.1±3.0 29.4±4.4 7/8 Table 1 shows reduced duration of menses (p < 0.05), longer follicular phases (p < 0.05), and no change in luteal phase length (p > 0.05) were evident during the intermittent low dose antiprogestin regiment period. Of particular significance are three observations. First the ovarian/menstrual cycles continued in an almost "normal" fashion. Second, the once weekly antiprogestin regimen reliably prevented contraception. Third, there was a rapid recovery ("reversibility") from fertility control, with some pregnancies beginning in the initial post-treatment cycle and others in the second and third cycles after the treatment had ended. A second phase of the study was conducted in order to elucidate the primary contraceptive mechanism of action of the antiprogestin. In this phase, 14 female monkeys were subjected to the same treatment and coital protocol for one cycle as described above except that on menstrual cycle day 23, laparotomy was done in order to allow retrograde lavage of the reproductive track potentially in order to collect oocytes and/or pre-embryos. Additionally, an endometrial wedge was taken from each monkey on that day and evaluated histologically in order to access appropriateness of secretory tissue maturation. Table 2 summarizes the results. Total Oocytes Collected Cleaved and/or Fertilized Oocytes "Normal" Oocytes (intact) Degenerate Oocytes (dark Cytoplasm) Subsequent Pregnancies 11 0 7 4 0 The endometrial thickness was noted to be markedly reduced (about 60%) compared to temporally controls in mid-luteal phase. The endometrium of 12 of the 14 monkeys was at a very early secretory phase when biopsies were taken on day 23, that is they were not synchronous with the observed serum profiles of estradiol and progesterone even though onset of the luteal phase was delayed until cycle day 17 or 18 by the RU 486 therapy. Eleven unfertilized oocytes were recovered of which four were degenerate. No cleaving pre-embryos were noted and no pregnancies subsequently occurred. It is noteworthy that the oocytes did not have zona bound sperm attached to them. Thirteen of the 14 monkeys had apparently ovulatory/menstrual cycles during the once weekly oral doses of 12.5 mg of RU 486, as assessed by the presence of an identifiable corpus luteum at laparotomy on cycle day 23. The findings in the above studies demonstrate that when using a low dose administration regimen of anti-progestin therapy, ovulatory/menstrual cycles can be maintained while simultaneously achieving a contraceptive action through the primary mechanism of inhibiting normal oocyte fertilization. Even though the follicular phases of the antiprogestin treatment cycles were slightly extended, the regularity of menses was not deterred. The duration of the menses was reduced. The cumulative conception rate in post-treatment cycles is comparable to never treated females which indicates a rapid and full reversibility. EXAMPLES 2-5 The study described in Example 1 is repeated except that the following antiprogestins are substituted for RU 486: Example Antiprogestin 2 onapristone 3 lilopristone 4 11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-17β-hydroxy-17α-(1-propinyl)-4,9-estradien-3-one 5 11β-(4-acetylphenyl)-17β-hydroxy-17α-(3-hydroxy-1(2)-propenyl)-4,9-estradien-3-one It will be appreciated that a reliable contraceptive use which can sustain endogenous ovarian steroid secretion within the physiologic zone is an attractive alternative to existing exogenous hormonal formulations that prevent ovulation and artificially regulate menses. This can be achieved, as demonstrated by the foregoing results which used RU 486 as a model progesterone receptor antagonist in a once weekly low dose regiment. It should be observed that the study described above in Example 1 did not attempt to determine the lowest effective dose of the antiprogestin.

Claims: Use of a progesterone receptor antagonist for preventing an oocyte from becoming fertilized without preventing ovulation or interfering with the regularity of the ovarian menstrual cycle of a mammal. The use according to claim 1, wherein the amount of the progesterone receptor antagonist is 0.01 to 1 mg, The use according to claim 1, wherein the amount of the progesterone receptor antagonist is 0.05 to 0.5 mg. The use according to claim 1, wherein the progesterone receptor antagonist is mifepristone. Use of a progesterone receptor antagonist for the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition being administered within a inert matrix which is implanted within the body of a mammal for preventing an oocyte from becoming fertilized without preventing ovulation or interfering with the regularity of the ovarian menstrual cycle of a mammal. The use according to claim 5, wherein the amount of progesterone receptor antagonist administered is 0.01 to 1 mg. The use according to claim 5, wherein the amount of progesterone receptor antagonist administered is 0.05 to 0.5 mg. The use according to claim 5, wherein the progesterone receptor antagonist is mifepristone.

Inventors: HODGEN GARRY D, HODGEN, GARRY D.
Applicants: EASTERN VIRGINIA MED SCHOOL, EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL
Application year: 1994
Main classification: A61K31
IPC codes: A61K31, A61P15