Concentrated high flash point surfactant compositions

Abstract: Disclosed are concentrated high flash point surfactant compositions comprising an alcohol ethosulfate free of low flash solvents, a primary alcohol ethoxylate and glacial acetic acid in a weight ratio of 5 to 80% alcohol ethosulfate, 80 to 20% alcohol ethoxylate and 2 to 20% acetic acid. Preferably, a fourth component consisting of a nonionic surfactant such as caster oil ethoxylate is employed in the composition.

Description: The present invention pertains to concentrated surfactant compositions having high flash points. These stable compositions provide utility in a variety of papermaking operations. Combinations of surfactants, such as anionic and nonionic surfactants, have proven useful in industries such as papermaking to provide detergency, wetting, dispersancy, and emulsification. Traditionally, alkyl phenol ethoxylates have been used in these surfactant blends but have come under environmental pressure from European countries and the Great Lakes region of the United States as being less biodegradable than other surfactants. Surfactants such as alcohol ethoxylates and their deriva tives should experience increased use as more environmentally sound substitutes for alkyl phenol ethoxylates and their derivatives. Concentrated surfactant blends are most desirable for economic reasons. Unfortunately, concentrated liquid blends containing a high percentage of alcohol ethosulfate generally have low flash points as they are stabilized with ethanol to improve stability and handling characteristics. However, many industries such as the papermaking industry operate at high temperatures and cannot utilize materials having low flash points for safety reasons. Thus, the need to develop effective concentrated nonyl phenol free high flash products which were stable and capable of being pumped at temperatures as low as 40°F. The present inventive composition meets these objectives. The present invention relates to concentrated surfactant compositions of alcohol ethosulfate free of low flash solvents and primary alcohol ethoxylate. Acetic acid is also incorporated in the mixture to keep the surfactants from gelling when combined. Additionally, a fourth component, a nonionic surfactant, can be employed in the mixture to increase its stability and decrease its cold temperature viscosity. In European Patent Application EP-A-0-243-685 and EP 0-109-022, low molecular weight solvents such as alcohols, glycols, glycol ethers and ketones are used to make liquid detergents of anionic surfactants and nonionic surfactants. Alcohol ethosulfates and alcohol ethoxylates are taught as some of the effective surfactants. US-A-4,285,841 employs a low molecular weight phase regulant to combine fatty acids, sulfated or sulfonated anionic surfactant, and an ethoxylated nonionic surfactant to make a concentrated ternary detergent system. The phase regulant, essential for manufacture and stability, is either a low molecular weight aliphatic alcohol or ether. US-A-3,893,955 employs a salt of a low molecular weight carboxylic acid, rather than ethanol, to an alcohol ethosulfate concentrate so that it can be diluted with water without gelling. This can also include some free alkoxylated alcohol. Canada 991502 employs a C 1 to C 6 sulfate or sulfonate to control viscosity of an alcohol ethosulfate concentrate. US-A-4,772,426 employs a combination of higher molecular weight carboxylic acids, C 8 -C 22 , and alcohol ethoxylates to lower the viscosity of sulfonated alkyl esters. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION This invention discloses concentrated high flash point surfactant compositions comprising (a) an alcohol ethosulfate, (b) a primary alcohol ethoxylate and (c) glacial acetic acid. By high flash point surfactant composition is meant a surfactant composition having a flash point greater than 100°F. The alcohol ethosulfate compounds are free of low flash point solvents so that the compositions can be employed in pulp and papermaking systems or other industrial applications where process temperatures can reach 65.56°C (150°F) and above. The National Fire Protection Association defines flammable liquids as those with flash points of 37.78°C (100°F) or less. As used herein, low flash point solvents are those having flash points of 37.78°C (100°F) or less. The composition comprises 5 to 80% by weight alcohol ethosulfate and 20 to 80% by weight primary alcohol ethoxylate. 2 to 20% by weight acetic acid is incorporated in amounts that assure that the first two components do not gel upon combination with each other. The alcohol ethosulfate can have chain lengths from about C 8 to about C 22 with degrees of ethoxylation from about 1 to about 30 moles per mole of alcohol. The preferred alcohol ethosulfate has an average chain length of about C 12 and having 1 to 4 moles ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol. The alcohol ethosulfate should be 60 to 90% actives and should be free of low flash solvents. These compounds are commercially available from Rhone Poulenc and Henkle. The primary alcohol ethoxylate can have chain lengths from about C 8 to about C 22 with C 12 to C 16 being preferred. The degree of ethoxylation is from 1 to about 30 moles of ethoxylation per mole of alcohol with 5 to 10 moles of ethoxylation preferred. The primary alcohol ethoxylate should be about 90 to 100% actives. These compounds are commercially available from Shell, Texaco and Hoechst Celanese. Preferably, the composition contains 30 to 45% by weight alcohol ethosulfate (21 to 32% actives if 70% actives ethosulfate), 35 to 55% by weight primary alcohol ethoxylate, and 4 to 10% by weight glacial acetic acid. More preferably, a fourth component can be included in the composition at about 10 to 20%. This fourth component can be any nonionic surfactant other than an alkyl phenol ethoxylate and should differ in structure and/or degree of ethoxylation from the main nonionic component (primary alcohol ethoxylate). Examples of such nonionic surfactants are secondary alcohol ethoxylates, ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block copolymers, and caster oil ethoxylates. Preferably, this fourth component is caster oil ethoxylate. These components are preferably mixed together at approximately 51.67°C to 65.56°C (125°F to 150°F) to decrease the cold temperature viscosity to a pumpable level. The compositions of the present invention provide enhanced removal of undesirable organics from pulp and papermaking systems. The inventors anticipate the compositions of the present invention will provide utility for detergency, wetting, dispersancy and emulsification in papermaking processes as well as many other potential industrial applications. The following examples are included as being illustrations of the invention and should not be construed as limiting the scope thereof. Examples A 100% active linear primary alcohol ethoxylate (PAE) with 7 moles of ethylene oxide (EO) per mole of alcohol (C 12 to C 16 ) was combined with three types of alcohol ethosulfates to evaluate the state of the mixture at room temperature. In these examples, % actives refers only to the alcohol ethosulfate and primary alcohol ethoxylate actives. In some instances, water was added to some formulations. This quantity of water is the difference between weight % added and 100%. The types of alcohol ethosulfates used throughout the examples as Type A, Type B and Type C. These formulations are designated below: Type A is 60% actives with 3 moles EO, 15% low flash solvent (ethanol) Type B is 30% actives with 3 moles EO, 0% low flash solvent Type C is 70% actives with 2 moles EO, 0% low flash solvent These results are presented in Table I. Weight % Added Final Formula Alcohol Ethosulfate Primary Alcohol Ethoxylate Third Component % Actives Form 50.0%A 50.0% 0% 80.0% Liquid 50.0%B 50.0% 0% 65.0% Gel 50.0%C 50.0% 0% 85.0% Gel 45.5%C 45.5% 9.0%SC 77.4% Gel 42.0%C 42.0% 8.0%SC 71.4% Gel 42.0%C 42.0% 8.0%CA 71.4% Gel 34.0%C 52.0% 7.0%CA 75.8% Gel 41.0%C 49.0% 7.5%SG 77.7% Gel 32.3%C 64.5% 3.2%AA 87.1% Liquid 39.6%C 52.7% 7.7%AA 80.4% Liquid 43.4%C 47.2% 9.4%AA 77.6% Liquid 41.0%C 49.0% 10.0%AA 77.7% Liquid 40.0%C 47.5% 10.0%AA 75.5% Liquid 39.0%C 46.0% 10.0%AA 73.3% Liquid SC is sodium citrate CA is citric acid SG is sodium gluconate AA is acetic acid, glacial The data presented in Table I serves to illustrate that liquid products cannot be made by combining Type B and C ethosulfates with primary alcohol ethoxylate alone whereas Type A ethosulfate (containing ethanol) can. Further, sodium citrate and sodium gluconate, as taught in US-A-Patent 3,893,955 did not work to make a liquid product. However, acetic acid produced a liquid formula each time it was used. The formulas employing acetic acid also had higher flash points than those using ethanol (Formula 1 = 43.33°C (110°F), Formula 2 93.33°C (> 200°F). Table II demonstrates the form of the mixture when different primary alcohol ethoxylates were combined with Type C ethosulfate and glacial acetic acid in the following ratio: 47.2% primary alcohol ethoxylate 9.4% acetic acid 43.4% Type C alcohol ethosulfate Primary Alcohol Ethoxylate Final Formula Alcohol Chain Length Moles EO Form C 9 -C 11 6 Liquid C 12 -C 15 3 Liquid C 12 -C 15 7 Liquid C 12 -C 15 12 Liquid C 14 -C 15 13 Liquid This table shows that acetic acid aids in keeping the combination of alcohol ethosulfate and (a wide range of) primary alcohol ethoxylates in liquid form at room temperature. Further studies were conducted to determine if a four component mixture could remain liquid. The fourth component was selected from a variety of nonionic surfactants and added to the type C alcohol ethosulfate (AES)/primary alcohol ethoxylate (PAE)/acetic acid (AA) mixture. These results are reported in Table III. Weight % Added Final Formula AES PAE AA Fourth Component % Actives Form 34.8% 44.8% 4.5% 15.9% 69.2% Liquid 35.0% 45.0% 4.0% 16.0% 69.5% Liquid 38.9% 38.9% 5.6% 16.6% 66.1% Liquid 35.7% 42.9% 3.6% 17.8% 67.9% Liquid 39.2% 39.2% 5.9% 15.7% 66.6% Liquid 38.0% 38.0% 5.0% 19.0% 64.6% Liquid 38.0% 38.0% 11.0% 13.0% 64.6% Liquid 34.3% 44.1% 5.9% 15.7% 68.1% Liquid 34.2% 39.0% 7.3% 19.5% 62.9% Liquid 29.4% 38.2% 7.0% 22.8% 58.8% Liquid 15.0% 65.0% 7.0% 13.0% 75.5% Liquid 5.0% 75.0% 7.0% 13.0% 78.5% Liquid PAE with 7 moles ethylene oxide (EO) and C 12 to C 16 alkyl chain lengths In the following example, three and four component formulations were made employing type C laurel alcohol ethosulfate (AES), primary alcohol ethoxylate (PAE) with 7 moles EO per mole of C 12 to C 16 alcohol and glacial acetic acid (AA). The fourth component was selected from secondary alcohol ethoxylate (SAE) with 3 moles EO per mole of alcohol or caster oil ethoxylate (COE) with 5, 30 or 40 °Cmoles EO. Formula Weight % Added Final Formula AES PAE AA SAE COE % Actives I 41% 49% 10% 0% 0% 77.7% II 38% 38% 6% 18% 0% 64.6% III 35% 45% 4% 0% 16% (5 EO) 69.5% IV 35% 45% 4% 0% 16% (30 EO) 69.5% V 35% 45% 7% 0% 13% (5 EO) 69.5% VI 35% 45% 7% 0% 13% (30 EO) 69.5% VII 35% 45% 7% 0% 13% (40 EO) 69.5% The viscosity of these final formulas was measured at different temperatures using a Brookfield viscometer (RVT spindle #4, 10 rpm) one to two days after formulation. In industrial applications it is desirable for a product to be easily pumped at lower temperatures. This should mean a viscosity around 3000 centipoise or lower. This is presented in Table V. If the formula was solid or nearly solid the viscosity was not measured. In these instances, NS (nearly solid) is reported for viscosity. In some instances, more than one version of the same formula was made using different batches of raw material or material from different suppliers. The ranges of viscosity shown in Table V refer to the range observed for these different versions of formulas. The formulas were processed at either 23.89°C to 51.67°C (75°F or 125°F). Formula Number Prepared Process Temp°C(°F) Formulation Viscosity (Centipoise) 23.89°C(75°F) 10°C(50°F) 4.44°C(40°F) I 8 23.89(75) 300-1400 900-3000 N.S. I 3 51.67(125) 440-640 1100-1560 2100-N.S II 5 23.89(75) 800-1540 1840-3140 N.S. II 6 51.67(125) 240-600 500-1260 1040-2760 III 3 23.89(75) 900-1760 2000-4500 N.S. III 1 51.67(125) 1500 3440 N.S. IV 1 23.89(75) 1040 2060 4000 V 1 51.67(125) 400 760 1100 VI 3 23.89(75) 1100-2000 1960-3500 2600-N.S. VII 2 23.89(75) 1100-1840 1840-3100 3400-N.S. VII 7 51.67(125) 300-600 740-1500 1300-2500 The addition of the fourth component generally decreased the cold temperature viscosity of these formulations when they were processed at the elevated temperature. It was necessary that the acetic acid level be greater than 4% to notice this advantage. Typically, process equipment will contain some remnant wash water that will contaminate mixtures when they are processed. The amount of this contaminant water would likely be approximately 0.5-1%. The effect of contaminant water was analyzed on formulas I, II and VII from Table IV, by adding water (an amount equal to 1 weight percent of the formulation) to the mixing vessel prior to formulation. The viscosities of these formulations are contained in Table VI. Formula ID Process Temperature °C(°F) Viscosity (Centipoise) 21.11°C(70°F) 10°C(50°F) 4.44°C(40°F) I 51.67°C(125) 700 2200 N.S. II 51.67°C(125) 400 1500 N.S. VII 51.67°C(125) 400 1000 1800 A comparison of Tables V and VI reveals that the caster oil ethoxylate continued to decrease the cold temperature viscosity even in the presence of contaminant process water, whereas, secondary alcohol ethoxylate did not. A comparative study was performed to determine the ability of the present composition to stabilize calcium oleate salts. For this study, the products were added to a system containing 50 ppm sodium oleate, 100 ppm Ca+ 2 with a pH of 9 and incubated at 71°C or 88°C for 30 minutes. The transmittance of the test solutions was measured to determine the degree to which the formula was able to stabilize the insoluble salts against agglomeration. The products in these examples were added on an equal cost basis and not equal actives basis. Thus, dosages will not be equal. These results are reported in Table VII. Formula 71°C 88°C Actual Dosage (ppm) % Increase in Transmittance Actual Dosage (ppm) % Increase in Transmittance I 24 83% 47 75% II 22 89% 43 78% VII 22 81% 45 74% PVA 72 16% 144 8% NPE 27 74% 54 46% The example shown in Table VII represents only one of the possible utilities of products described by this invention. Formulations I, II and VII, from Table IV, were relatively stable formulations, however, occasionally, there was some separation at elevated temperatures 50°C (122°F). Table VIII depicts how often this separation occurred for these formulas. SEPARATION at 50°C (122°F) Formula ID Number of Versions Number Separated Percent that Separated I 12 6 50% II 13 2 15% VII 10 2 20% Table VIII illustrates the advantage of a fourth nonionic surfactant component for added product stability. The visual separation that these mixtures experienced was not a separation of the main components as there was not a difference in the performance of the product at the top of a formulation as compared to the bottom portion. This point is demonstrated in Table IX which is a comparison of the performance of the top portion of a formula exhibiting this visual separation compared to the bottom portion. Performance was judged using the same procedure as described in Table VII, at 71°C using 25 ppm product. EFFECT OF SEPARATION ON PERFORMANCE Formula ID Percent Increase in Transmittance Top Portion Bottom Portion I 72% 70% II 70% 70% VII 81% 80% Based on the results in Table IX, the apparent separation these formulations occasionally display is not an issue since there is not a difference in performance from the top to the bottom of the formulation. As Table VIII shows, the use of a fourth component helps decrease the number of these incidences. To demonstrate how a formulation such as this would be fed into an aqueous industrial stream 1 ml of formula VII from Table IV was added to 150 mls deionized water or diluted black liquor stirring at a moderate rate with a magnetic mixer. The black liquor, the liquid remaining after wood chips are pulped containing organics (mainly lignin) and spent cooking chemicals, was diluted to roughly 0.2% dissolved solids. The time necessary to dissolve the formulation at various temperatures is recorded in Table X. TIME NECESSARY TO DISSOLVE FORMULATION VII Temperature Deionized Water Diluted Black Liquor 27°C 233 sec 314 sec 38°C 123 sec ------- 50°C 66 sec ------- 55°C 23 sec 23 sec 62°C 6 sec ------- 65°C ------- 2 sec Table X demonstrates that formulations of this type can easily be dissolved in industrial process streams that are at least 55°C. While this invention has been described with respect to particular embodiments thereof, it is apparent that numerous other forms and modifications of this invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art. The appended claims and this invention generally should be construed to cover all such obvious forms and modifications which are within the scope of the present invention.

Claims: A concentrated high flash point surfactant composition comprising (a) an alcohol ethosulfate free of low flash solvents, (b) a primary alcohol ethyoxylate, and (c) glacial acetic acid. A composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein said alcohol ethosulfate has an alkyl carbon chain length of from about C 8 to about C 22 . A composition as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein said alcohol ethosulfate has from about 1 to about 30 moles ethoxylation per mole of alcohol. A composition as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein said alcohol ethosulfate has an alkyl carbon chain length averaging C 12 and 1 to 4 moles ethoxylation per mole of alcohol. A composition as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein said primary alcohol ethoxylate has a carbon chain length of from about C 8 to about C 22 . A composition as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein said primary alcohol ethoxylate has from about 1 to about 30 moles ethoxylation per mole of alcohol. A composition as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein said primary alcohol ethoxylate has an alkyl carbon chain length of from C 12 to C 16 and 5 to 10 moles ethoxylation per mole of alcohol. A composition as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the weight ratio of (a) : (b) : (c) is 5 to 80% : 80 to 20% ; 2 to 20%. A composition as claimed in claim 8, wherein the weight ratio of (a) : (b) : (c) is 30 to 45% : 35 to 55% : 4 to 10%. A composition as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, further comprising a second nonionic surfactant. A composition as claimed in claim 10, comprising a second nonionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of a secondary or primary alcohol ethoxylate, a caster oil ethoxylate and a block copolymer of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide. A composition as claimed in claim 11, wherein said second nonionic surfactant is caster oil ethoxylate with 30 to 50 moles ethylene oxide per mole of caster oil. A composition as claimed in any of claims 10 to 12, comprising by weight 30 to 45% alcohol ethosulfate, 35 to 55% primary alcohol ethoxylate, 4 to 10% glacial acetic acid and 10 to 20% second nonionic surfactant. A composition as claimed in any one of claims 10 to 13, wherein said composition is mixed together at 51.67°C to 65.56°C (125°F to 150°F).

Inventors: DREISBACH DAVID D, PEASE JACQUELINE K, DREISBACH, DAVID D., PEASE, JACQUELINE K.
Applicants: BETZ EUROP INC, BETZ EUROPE, INC.
Application year: 1994
Main classification: B01F17
IPC codes: C11D3, C11D1