ACTIVATOR FORMULATION AND COMPOSITION UTILIZING SAME

Abstract: A multi-part composition is provided which is suitable for use as an adhesive, a potting compound, a coating or a sealant. It consists of a polymerizable acrylate formulation and an activating formulation, the latter usually comprising an amine-aldehyde condensation product diluted with a liquid vinyl ether; liquid epoxides may also be included as diluents in the activating formulation.

Description: ACTIVATOR FORMULATION AND COMPOSITION UTILIZING SAME BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION A ine-aldehyde condensation products are widely em- ployed as chemical activators for effecting free radical- initiated polymerization, notably in compositions such as the acrylate adhesives that are disclosed in Bachmann United States patents Nos. 4,348,503, 4,429,088, and 4,432,829, and Bachmann et al United States patents Nos. 4,963,220, 4,964,938, and 5,039,715. Such activators are commercially available from several sources, and are typically used as solutions in 1,1,1-trichloroethylene or alcohol; illustra¬ tive products include VANAX 808 (aniline/butyraldehyde) and VANAX 833 (butylamine/butyraldehyde) , both sold by R.T. Vanderbilt, Inc., and HEPTEEN BASE (aniline/heptaldehyde) , sold by Uniroyal Chemical Corporation. The inclusion of an inert solvent in an otherwise sol¬ vent-free system is of course disadvantageous from a number of standpoints. Such solvents may give rise to flamma- bility, toxicity, and ozone-depletion problems; bond strengths may be reduced due to solvent residues and/or ex¬ cessive plasticization; shrinkage upon curing may be in¬ creased; and evaporation requirements will diminish the con¬ venience, and indeed feasibility, of use for many applica- tions. Needless to say, such disadvantages are encountered irrespective of the particular activator and polymerization formulations involved. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, it is a broad object of the present inven- tion to provide a multi-part, solvent-free composition that cures, by free radical-inducing chemical activation, to an adhesive solid, and to provide an activating formulation that is suitable for use therein. A more specific object is to provide such a composition and formulation in which the initiating ingredient is ad¬ mixed with a diluent that is itself copolymerizable with the ingredient(s) of the polymerizable formulation. A further object is to provide such a composition and formulation in which the diluent is a mixture of ingredients that function effectively while also affording improved eco¬ nomics. Other broad objects of the invention are to provide methods, for bonding, coating, potting and sealing, in which methods problems and disadvantages stemming from the pres¬ ence of inert solvents are ameliorated, or entirely avoided. It has now been found that certain of the foregoing and related objects of the invention are attained by the provi¬ sion of a multi-part, solvent-free composition that cures by chemical activation to an adhesive solid, which composition comprises a polymerizable formulation and an activating for¬ mulation. A two-part composition will usually be provided, and will often be particularly convenient for use when the formulations are so prepared as to react with one another in about a 1:1 ratio. The polymerizable formulation includes at least one polymerizable liquid acrylate ingredient, and is preferably comprised of a polymerizable acrylate monomer and an elastomeric domain-providing filler; it may advanta¬ geously also include about 0.5 to 5 weight percent of an organic acid that is capable of cyclic tautomerism, typi¬ cally maleic acid. The activating formulation contains about 0.5 to 80, and usually not more than 70, weight per¬ cent of a free radical-initiating ingredient, and conversely about 20 to 99.5, and usually at least 30, percent of a re- active diluent; 20 to 100, and preferably at least 40 weight percent of the diluent is a liquid vinyl ether compound, the remainder being a liquid epoxy compound. The composition includes an active oxygen compound that is reactive with the initiating ingredient to generate free radicals, normally supplied as an ingredient of the polymerizable formulation. Photoinitiators and transition metal accelerators may addi¬ tionally be included, each to substantial benefit. The vinyl ether diluents used will usually conform to the structural formula: R'R" (R-C=C-0) n -Q, in whi h formula each of the substituents R, R' and R" inde¬ pendently represents an hydrogen atom, an aliphatic group. or an aromatic group, n is an integer, usually having a value from 1 to 6; and Q represents an aliphatic group, an aromatic group, an alkoxy group, a cycloaliphatic group, an ester group, a polyester group, an ether group, a polyether group, a carbamide group, a carbamate group, an heterocyclic group, or the like, each of such groups optionally being further substituted by an hydroxyl or a vinyl group, or both. The vinyl ether-terminated ester monomers and vinyl ether-terminated aromatic urethane oligomers, described in the following papers, may also find utility as the vinyl ether ingredient of the activating formulation: "New Vinyl Ether Oligomers And Diluent Monomers For Cationic Curing" (Brautigam et al; Proceedings of RadTech , 90 - North America, Radiation and Curing Conference and Exposition, Vol. 1, pages 99-104) ; and "Vinyl Ether Terminated Ester Monomers: New Reactive Diluents For Cationic Curing" (Lapin et al; Proceedings of RadTech '90 - North America, Radiation and Curing Conference and Exposition, Vol. 1, pages 410- 414) . It is also believed that analogous compounds, in which a sulfur atom replaces the oxygen of the ether group(s) , may be used (alone or in combination) as the dilu¬ ent ingredient of the activating formulation hereof. Other objects of the invention are attained by the pro¬ vision of an activating formulation comprised of the ingre- dients set forth, and still others are attained by the pro¬ vision of a method that employs the multi-part composition described. In accordance with one embodiment of the method, two (or more) separate formulations are applied to at least one surface, and are mixed together by bringing another sur- face into substantial contact therewith. The method may also be utilized for coating, for cavity filling (as in pot¬ ting) , and for sealing, in which embodiments the formula¬ tions will be mixed with one another before application (as may of course also be done when they are used as adhesives, assuming the pot-life is sufficient) . DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Exemplary of the efficacy of the present invention are the following specific Examples, in which all parts and per¬ centages set forth are on a weight basis, and all reactions are carried out at room temperature, unless specified other¬ wise: EXAMPLE ONE An adhesive formulation was prepared by admixing the following ingredients, in the amounts (parts) indicated in parentheses: polyurethane-acrylate oligomer (20) , 2-hydroxy- ethyl methacrylate [HEMA] (31.5), isobornyl acrylate [IBOA] (25) , polystyrene impact-modifier resin (10) , acrylic acid (5), maleic acid (1.5), amorphous fumed silica (5), and t- butyl perbenzoate (2) . Steel laps, each measuring about 2.5 x 10 x 0.16 cm, were freshly sanded using 100 grit paper. A thin (0.03 to 0.13 mm) layer of the foregoing adhesive formulation was applied to a surface of one of the laps, and a layer of each of the activator/diluent formulations described in TABLE ONE, which follows, was applied as a thin film to another lap. The coated areas of the two pieces were brought to¬ gether, with an overlap of about 1.25 cm, and the assembly was secured by a clamp; room temperature curing was allowed to occur for 24 hours. Five specimens of each combination were so prepared, and were tested for shear tensile strength using a Tinius Olsen testing machine (model SG Locap) operating at about 15.24 cm (0.5 foot) per minute; averaged values are reported in the TABLE: TABLE ONE Diluent Activator (%) Tensile Shear UVR-6128/DVE-3 VANAX 808 (33) 168 (2396) UVR-6351/DVE-3 VANAX 808 (33) 148 (2100) UVR-6110/DVE-3 VANAX 808 (20) 180 (2556) DVE-3 VANAX 808 (70) 158 (2254) PEPC VANAX 808 (50) 145 (2056) CHVE VANAX 808 (70) 176 (2508) DVE-3/ARALDITE VANAX 808 (22) 197 (2808) DVE-3 VANAX 808 (50) 199 (2830) DVE-3 VANAX 808 (20) 197 (2808) DVE-3 VANAX 808 (33) 209 (2980) THFVE VANAX 808 (20) 183 (2610) DDVE VANAX 808 (20) 176 (2508) DVE-3 VANAX 808 (1) failed DVE-3 VANAX 808 (10) 214 (3038) DVE-3/UVR-6110 VANAX 808 (5) 223 (3170) DDVE HEPTEEN BASE | [2) 181 (2572) DVE-3 HEPTEEN BASE | [50) 182 (2582) DVE-3 HEPTEEN BASE | [30) 179 (2546) DVE-3 HEPTEEN BASE | [50) 182 (2582) CVE HEPTEEN BASE | [20) 176 (2504) CVE/UVR-6110 HEPTEEN BASE | [20) 195 (2776) HBVE HEPTEEN BASE | r 20) 175 (2492) HBVE/ARALDITE VANAX 833 (20) 63 (896) CVE VANAX 833 (20) 69 (984) DVE-3 VANAX 833 (20) 53 (752) DVE-3/ESO Oil VANAX 833 (20) 73 (1036) Trichloroethylene VANAX 808 (16) 158 (2254) None VANAX 808 (100) 74 (1048) The abbreviations used in TABLE ONE stand for the following compounds: triethylene glycol divinyl ether (DVE-3) , 1,4- cyclohexane dimethanol divinyl ether (CHVE) , propenyl ether of propylene carbonate (PEPC) , n-dodecyl vinyl ether (DDVE) , hydroxybutyl vinyl ether (HBVE) , cyclohexyl vinyl ether (CVE) , and tetrahydrofuran vinyl ether (THFVE) . The prod- ucts designated UVR-6110, UVR-6128, and UVR-6351 are, re¬ spectively, 3,4-epoxycyclohexylmethyl-3, 4-epoxy-cyclo- hexanecarboxylate, bis-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)adipate, and a mixture of liquid epoxides, all sold by Union Carbide Corpo- ration; ARALDITE is the product ARALDITE GY 6010, and is the diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A, sold by Ciba-Geigy Corpora¬ tion; ESO Oil is an epoxidized soybean oil sold by C. P. Hall Company under the designation PARAPLEX G 60; and the VANAX and HEPTEEN BASE aldehyde-amine activators are as hereinabove identified. In those instances in which the diluent is shown to comprise two ingredients, they are pres¬ ent in equal amounts (1:1 ratio). The relative proportions of the diluents and the activators are indicated by the number shown in parentheses following the activator designa- tion, which represents its percentage concentration (the remainder being the diluent) . Tensile shear values are taken at room temperature, and are expressed in kilograms per square centimeter (as well as in pounds per square inch, in parentheses) . As will be noted from a comparison of the control test that employs an activator solution prepared from trichloro- ethylene and 15% VANAX 808, with the test that follows it in the TABLE (i.e., comparing the last two tests), the use of neat VANAX produces an inferior result. In general, more- over, it is seen that the vinyl ether and vinyl ether/epoxy diluent-containing systems provide values that are better than that which is exhibited by the halogenated solvent con¬ trol formulation. The specimen that was bonded using an activating formulation containing only 1% of VANAX 808 did not produce measurable strengths. EXAMPLE TWO A polymerizable formulation was prepared by admixing the following ingredients, in the amounts (parts) indicated in parentheses: polyurethane-acrylate oligomer (40) , HEMA (35), acrylic acid (4), maleic acid (1.5), amorphous fumed silica (6) , polystyrene impact modifier resin (9) , t-butyl perbenzoate (2), and a UV-responsive photoinitiator (1.4), specifically, dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone (Ciba-Geigy IRGACURE 651) . A measured quantity of the foregoing formu¬ lation was thoroughly mixed in a vessel with an equal quan¬ tity of an amine-aldehyde activating formulation, the latter containing 22 parts of VANAX 808, 39 parts of DVE-3, and 39 parts of ARALDITE GY 6010. An exotherm was noted after about 50 seconds, attaining a maximum temperature of 75°C, and a hard, tough, intractable, solid mass soon formed. The mass conformed to the shape of the vessel, and was found to have a Shore D hardness value of 20 and a shrinkage value of 2.77 percent, the overall properties of the mass thus indi¬ cating the suitability of the composition for use as a pot¬ ting compound and for filling voids. EXAMPLE THREE Part A VANAX 808 was added, in an amount sufficient to provide a concentration of about 1.6 percent, to a premixture of equal parts of DVE-3 and the adhesive formulation of EXAMPLE ONE. An exotherm was noted, and a dark, solid reaction mass was produced. The mass was subdivided after being main¬ tained for about 24 hours at room temperature, and 8.0 parts thereof was placed into the thimble of a Soxhlet extractor. Methanol was caused to reflux through the material for a total period of 18 hours, after which the residuum was care- fully removed and dried; the yield was 6.85 parts (i.e., 85.63 percent of the mass was insoluble). Part B A comparison test was run by repeating the foregoing reaction, curing, and extraction procedures, using however the adhesive formulation alone (i.e., excluding the vinyl ether compound); 6.4 parts (80 percent) of residuum remained after extraction. Taking into account inherent variables, it can be concluded from these tests that the products pro¬ duced in Parts A and B hereof achieved substantially the same degree of polymerization, following chemical activa¬ tion. EXAMPLE FOUR Part A An anaerobic thread-locking product that is sold by Loctite Corporation under the name 290 Adhesive/Sealant, and is believed to contain 90 to 95 parts of polyglycol dimeth- acrylate, 3 to 5 parts of cumene hydroperoxide, 1 to 3 parts of saccharin, and 0.1 to 1 part of an N,N-dialkyltoluidine, was admixed with an equal amount of the activating formula¬ tion hereinabove described in EXAMPLE TWO. Gelation occur- red in about 30 seconds, accompanied by an exotherm having a maximum temperature of about 70°C. Part B The foregoing procedure was repeated, substituting how¬ ever for the "290" product a second-generation acrylic prod- uct sold by Lord Corporation under the designation VERSALOCK 830; comparable results were achieved. The VERSALOCK prod¬ uct is believed to contain the following ingredients, in the parts indicated: 60 to 70 methylmethacrylate, 20 to 30 chlorosulfonated rubber, 10 to 15 ethyleneglycol dimethacry- late, 10 to 15 methacrylic acid, and 2 to 3 cumene hydroper¬ oxide. Part C An anaerobic structural adhesive product that is sold by Loctite Corporation under the name Speedbonder 319, and is believed to contain 45 to 50 parts of a polyurethane methacrylate resin, 30 to 35 parts of an hydroxyalkyl meth- acrylate, 10 to 15 parts of a polymeric plasticizer, 3 to 5 parts of acrylic acid, 1 to 3 parts of cumene hydroperoxide, 1 to 3 parts of a substituted silane compound, 0.1 to 1 part of l-acetyl-2-phenylhydrazine, and 0.1 to 1 part of saccha¬ rin, was admixed with an equal amount of the activating for¬ mulation used in Parts A and B hereof. Gelling was observed to occur in about 3 to 5 minutes, and was accompanied by an exotherm that attained a maximum temperature of 35°C. EXAMPLE FIVE A number of glass slides were prepared by applying to them a thin film of the adhesive formulation employed in EXAMPLE ONE. Others were prepared by applying a thin film of one of the following two activating formulations: (A) 16 parts of VANAX 808 in 84 parts of isopropyl alcohol; (B) 22 parts of VANAX 808 in a mixture of 39 parts of DVE-3 and 39 parts of ARALDITE GY 6010. The slides coated with the acti¬ vating formulations were aged under ambient conditions, and each was then assembled face-to-face with one of the adhe¬ sive-carrying slides. Fixture times (i.e., times to achieve immobilization of the assembled slides, under manual force) were noted, and tensile shear strengths after curing were measured; the data obtained are set forth in TABLE TWO below, in which the periods of aging are indicated at the heads of the columns, fixture times are expressed in minutes, and tensile strengths are expressed in kg/cm 2 : TABLE TWO One Hour Four Days A B A B Fixture: 0.5 0.5 45 4 Strength: 166 189 89 178 From these data it is seen that activating formulations em¬ bodying the invention remain much more effective, following extended aging periods, than do the conventional activator solutions tested. EXAMPLE SIX Part A Tensile strength tests were carried out as described in EXAMPLE ONE, using the "319" adhesive product of EXAMPLE FOUR, Part C, in combination with the activating formulation of EXAMPLE TWO; a value of about 58 kg/cm 2 was achieved. Substituting an activating formulation containing 70 parts DVE-3 and 30 parts VANAX 808 produced a strength value of about 63 kg/cm 2 . The fixture time using glass slides (in the manner described in EXAMPLE FIVE, but without aging) was about six hours in each case. Part B The same tests were carried out using an anaerobic structural adhesive formulation sold by Loctite Corporation under the name Speedbonder 324 and believed to contain: 50 to 55 parts polyurethane acrylate resin, 25 to 30 parts hy- droxyalkyl methacrylate, 15 to 20 parts high-boiling meth- acrylate, 3 to 5 parts t-butyl perbenzoate, 1 to 3 parts acrylic acid, and 1 to 3 parts saccharin; the tensile strength values corresponding to those of Part A were 74 and 80 kg/cm 2 , respectively, and the fixture time was about 20 minutes. Part C The foregoing tests were repeated using another Loctite anaerobic structural adhesive called Speedbonder 326, be- lieved to contain: 45 to 50 parts polyurethane methacrylate resin, 30 to 35 parts hydroxyalkyl methacrylate, 10 to 15 parts high-boiling methacrylate, 1 to 3 parts acrylic acid, 0.1 to 1 part l-acetyl-2-phenylhydrazine, 0.1 to 1 part cum¬ ene hydroperoxide, and 0.1 to 1 part saccharin; correspond- ing tensile values were 35 and 70 k/g cm 2 , respectively, and the fixture time about was 6 hours. Part D Loctite Speedbonder 392 was used in the same tests, and is believed to contain: 35 to 40 parts polyurethane meth- acrylate resin, 20 to 25 parts high-boiling acrylate, 20 to 25 parts hydroxy-alkyl methacrylate, 5 to 7 parts meth- acrylic acid, 5 to 7 parts modified silicon dioxide, 3 to 5 parts t-butyl perbenzoate, 1 to 3 parts maleic acid, and 1 to 3 parts saccharin; corresponding tensile strength values measured were 172 and 155, respectively, and the fixture time was about 30 seconds. EXAMPLE SEVEN Part A The addition of 7 parts of amorphous fumed silica (AEROSIL R-202, sold by Degussa Corporation) to 93 parts of a 70 percent solution of VANAX 808 in DVE-3 produced an ac¬ tivator gel. The product was introduced into the chamber of a 30 ml plastic syringe, and was dispensed manually to form a bead on the surface of a steel lap. A second lap, carry¬ ing a layer of the polymerizable formulation described here- inabove in EXAMPLE TWO, was assembled with the first, with a 1.25 cm overlap, and the parts were clamped together and allowed to cure at room temperature for 24 hours. Lap-shear tensile values were taken as described above, with five such assemblies, and gave an averaged value of 161 kg/cm 2 . Part B In similar fashion, a bead of the same activator gel was formed on the surface of metal motor housing, and the same polymerizable formulation was applied, as a second bead, alongside the first. The deposits were mixed by placing a metal flange against the housing and rotating it through one full circle; excess material extruded from be¬ tween the surfaces to form a fillet. The assembly was sub¬ jected to 365 nanometer UV radiation, thereby effecting cure of the fillet. After 24 hours at room temperature, the as¬ sembly was tested in a laboratory press and was found to withstand a shear force in excess of 2,720 kilograms before rupture of the bond occurred. EXAMPLE EIGHT Mixtures of amine-aldehyde activators with either a reactive diluent or a polymerizable monomer were aged at 53°C. to assess stability; the results are set forth below in TABLE THREE, in which the following abbreviations, not previously defined, apply: n-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone (NVP) , tri- methylolpropane trimethacrylate (TMPTMA) , and tetrahydrofur- fural acrylate (THFA) . In all instances the activator is present in a 20 percent concentration, and times are ex¬ pressed in hours unless indicated otherwise. (The 168-hour periods represent tests that were terminated after one week's time) . TABLE THREE Formulation Time State DVE-3 168 liquid PEPC/VANAX 833 168 liquid HBVE/HEPTEEN BASE 168 liquid NVP/VANAX 808 48 some gel TMPTMA/VANAX 808 30 gelled THFA/VANAX 808 30 gelled IBOA/VANAX 808 48 viscous DVE-3/UVR-6110/VANA> [ 833 168 liquid DVE-3/VANAX 808 3 months liquid DVE-3/VANAX 808 + 3 months liquid t-butyl perbenzoate (1%) HEMA/VANAX 808 24 polymerized HEMA/VANAX 808 + 10 minutes exothermic t-butyl perbenzoate (1%) polymerizatio As will be appreciated from the foregoing, activator formu¬ lations that include monomers that are typically incorpor¬ ated in useful adhesive formulations (i.e., acrylate, meth- acrylate, and vinyl amide monomers) are unstable in admix¬ ture with the amine-aldehyde condensation products, as indi¬ cated by gelation, increased viscosity, and of course poly¬ merization. EXAMPLE NINE The adhesive formulation of EXAMPLE ONE was used in combination with various activator formulations, and in varying ratios, in the lap shear test described therein. The activator formulation consisted of the vinyl ether DVE- 3, admixed with zero to 90 percent (based upon the combina- tion of diluents) of the epoxide ARALDITE GY 6010, and 5 to 50 percent (based upon the total weight of the formulation) of VANAX 808. In TABLE FOUR, which follows, the relative proportions of vinyl ether and epoxide are indicated by set¬ ting forth under the heading "DVE-3" the percentage of the diluent that is constituted by vinyl ether; the relative proportions of amine-aldehyde and diluent are indicated by setting forth as column headings the percentage of VANAX used: TABLE FOUR VANAX 808: 50 0 15 5 DVE-3 Tensile Shear Strength 100 157 174 159 130 90 183 168 154 137 80 152 182 172 134 70 159 168 173 136 60 133 182 178 174 50 159 181 176 181 40 142 157 184 172 30 131 161 159 135 20 127 172 147 101 10 139 169 60 50 By virtue of the tensile strengths exhibited (which are ex- pressed in kg/cm 2 ) , the foregoing data demonstrate that, in the compositions described, both the vinyl ether and the epoxide compounds undergo copolymerization with the ingredi¬ ents of the polymerizable formulation. EXAMPLE TEN Equal parts mixtures of DVE-3 and ARALDITE 6010 were made, containing varying amounts of VANAX 808. The resul¬ tant activating formulations were mixed in a 50 ml plastic beaker with the polymerizable formulation of EXAMPLE TWO, in a ratio of polymerizable formulation to activating formula- tion of either 1:1 or 9:1, and the pot-life (i.e., time to set-up) and exotherm temperature of each admixture were mea¬ sured. The data are set forth in TABLE FIVE below: TABLE FIVE Ratio % VANAX Pot Life Temperature °C 1:1 20 10 sec. 29 1:1 10 15 sec. 29 1:1 2 40 sec. 34 1:1 1 80 sec. 34 1:1 0.5 10 min. 26 1:9 20 10 sec. 60 1:9 10 25 sec. 80 1:9 2 1 min. 75 1:9 1 3.5 min. 75 1:9 0.5 15 min. 65 EXAMPLE ELEVEN Part A An activating formulation was prepared from 60 parts DVE-3, 40 parts ARALDITE 6010, 4 parts N,N-dimethyl tolu- idine, and 0.1 part copper acetylacetonate. Mixed with each of the Speedbonder 319 and 326 products, in an adhesive:- activating formulation ratio of 5:1, gels were formed in about 1.5 minutes; application of the formulations to steel laps produced a shear strength of about 35 kg/cm 2 in the case of the "319" product, and about 70 kg/cm in the case of the "326" adhesive. Somewhat less beneficial results were ob¬ tained when the diluent consisted solely of the vinyl ether compoun . Part B An activating formulation of 0.4 percent ferrocene in DVE-3 effected gelling of the polymerizable formulation of EXAMPLE TWO in about 1.5 minutes. Part C An activating formulation containing 97 parts DVE-3, 2.2 parts of copper octoate, and 0.8 part tributylamine ef¬ fected gelling of the Speedbonder 326 adhesive in about 1.5 minutes. Used in steel lap-shear tests, the same components produced a tensile strength of about 112 kg/cm 2 . EXAMPLE TWELVE Steel laps were coated with a layer of either the poly¬ merizable formulation of EXAMPLE ONE or of EXAMPLE TWO, and were bonded to other laps, coated with a layer of activating formulation, by contacting and curing them for one hour at room temperature, followed by curing for an additional hour at 80°C. Set forth in TABLE SIX below are the ingredients of the activating formulation (vinyl ether, VANAX and ferric actylacetonate [FeAcAc]), the number of the EXAMPLE in which the polymerizable formulation used is described, the ratio of the latter to the activating formulation, and the tensile strength (measured in kg/cm 2 ) : TABLE SIX Vinyl Ether % VANAX % FeAcAc EXAMPLE Ratio Strength PEPC 1 0.1 ONE 1:1 4 PEPC 1 0.1 ONE 9:1 190 PEPC 2 TWO 1:1 35 PEPC 2 TWO 9:1 267 CHVE 0. 5 0.05 ONE 1:1 * CHVE 1 0.1 ONE 9:1 281 CHVE 2 TWO 1:1 84 CHVE 2 TWO 9:1 260 DVE-3 1 0.1 ONE 1:1 42 DVE-3 1 0.1 ONE 9:1 176 DVE-3 2 2 TWO 1:1 84 DVE-3 2 2 TWO 9:1 162 * rate of cure too fast to be practical Fundamental to the present invention, therefore, is the use of a liquid vinyl ether, alone or in combination with a liquid epoxide, as a diluent for the free radical-initiating component of a catalyst system. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the initiating component reacts with an active oxygen catalyst provided to produce free rad- icals, which in turn effect polymerization of acrylate in¬ gredient(s) of the polymerizable formulation. As a primary and necessary attribute of the diluents employed, they copolymerize substantially with the ingredi¬ ents of the polymerizable formulation. Another important feature is that they remain stable for extended periods of time in combination with the activator component. In addi¬ tion, however, the instant diluents impart excellent charac¬ teristics to the compositions provided, including good re- ducibility, low volatility, high dissolving power, low tox- icity and skin irritation, and high curing activity, and they may also serve to promote penetration into surfaces of the part(s) that are to be bonded or coated. The vinyl ethers and epoxides used have moreover been well character¬ ized and are presently produced commercially, and they are generally regarded as safe, non-toxic materials. The class of vinyl ether diluents found to be effective in the practice of the present invention are broadly defined by the structural formula hereinabove set forth, and pre¬ ferred compounds have also been specifically identified. Suitable epoxides may have a linear or cyclic structure, and compounds containing multiple epoxy groups may be employed; again, specific epoxides have been identified, and others will be evident to those skilled in the art from the de¬ scription provided. It is a most surprising feature of the present inven- tion that the vinyl ethers and epoxides function as diluents for the activators while not reacting spontaneously there¬ with, and that they thereby afford extended shelf-life in the admixture. It is a further surprising feature of the invention that the epoxides copolymerize in the present com- positions, when subjected solely to low-temperature, free radical curing conditions, since they are generally regarded to cure by additive or cationic mechanisms and are normally subject to free radical-induced curing only under forcing conditions; similarly, vinyl ethers normally polymerize at ambient temperatures through cationic mechanisms. In addition to the other advantages herein described, dilution of the initiating ingredient can serve to provide an activating formulation that can be utilized in a direct weight or volume proportion to the polymerizable formula¬ tion, and it enables further modification to provide con¬ trolled viscosities, and ultimately an activation formula- tion gel. These capabilities afford self-evident benefits in manufacturing and production operations; e.g., they en¬ able facile metering and ready combination of the components of the composition in a static mixer; they permit applica¬ tion as stable, side-by-side beads; etc. As indicated by EXAMPLE TEN, however, the formulations may be employed in a wide range of relative proportions, as may be most advanta¬ geous. Monomers that are suitable for use in the adhesive for¬ mulations of the instant compositions include of course both monofunctional and polyfunctional acrylates and methacry- lates. They will generally be reaction products of acrylic acid and/or methacrylic acid with one or more mono- or poly- basic, substituted or unsubstituted, alkyl (Cj to C 18 ) , aryl or aralkyl alcohols. Acrylates in which the alcohol moiety contains a polar substitutent (e.g., an hydroxyl, amine, halogen, cyano, heterocyclic or cyclohexyl group) will often be preferred because crosslinking, or other intermolecular bonding, is promoted thereby. Suitable such monomers and prepolymers are well known in the art, and are in part dis- closed for example at line 53, column 6, through line 35, column 7 of the above-mentioned Bachmann et al patent No. 4,429,088, and at line 14, column 4 through line 52, column 5 of United States patent No. 4,451,523. Nevertheless, it might be noted that the following acrylates and corre- sponding methacrylates (the methacrylate compounds being preferred in many instances) are especially suitable for use in the present compositions, alone or in combination with one another: hydroxyethylacrylate, isobornyl acrylate, tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate, dietheleneglycol diacrylate, butylene glycol diacrylate, neopentyl glycol diacrylate, octylacrylate and decylacrylate (normally in admixture) , polyethyleneglycol diacrylate, trimethylcyclohexyl acrylate, benzyl acrylate, butyleneglycol diacrylate, polybutylene- glycol diacrylate, tripropyleneglycol diacrylate, trimethyl- olpropane triacrylate, di-trimethylpropane tetraacrylate, and di-pentaerythritol pentaacrylate. If an elastomeric domain-providing filler is to be in¬ corporated, virtually any solid material that is soluble (to at least a significant degree) in a monomer fraction, and that serves to toughen flexibilize and/or strengthen the cured material, may be used. The filler need not however be introduced as a rubbery solid; liquids and waxy substances are also entirely suitable. It is most desirable that the filler be reactive with the monomeric components to produce intermolecular bonding, since that will enhance compati¬ bility and tend to maximize the ultimate properties of the adhesive or deposit produced. In any event, it is believed that the effective fillers toughen or otherwise desirably modify the cured polymer by dispersing in the monomer formu¬ lation to provide elastomeric domains; generally, they will be rubbery or elastomeric materials, thermoplastic polymers, or macromers. Although the selection of specific appropriate elasto¬ meric domain-providing fillers will also be evident to those skilled in the art, it might be mentioned that typical suit¬ able materials include vinyl polymers, acrylic polymers, polyester elastomers, glycol polymers, acrylated epoxies, natural and synthetic rubbers, polyester acrylates, epoxy acrylates, polyether acrylates, alkyd acrylates, polyol acrylates, and the like. In many instances, use of the urethane polymers and prepolymers will be found most benefi- cial, with the latter being especially desirable due to the potential that they afford for further reaction of their pendant isocyanate groups with a reactive functionality (e.g., an hydroxyl group) provided by a suitable acrylate monomer; diisocyanate-capped polyethers acrylated by reac- tion with hydroxyethyl acrylate or hydroxyethyl methacrylate and having a molecular weight of about 400 to 6,000, are particularly preferred. It should perhaps be emphasized that many compositions will require no prepolymer or other filler. When such an ingredient is employed, however, it will generally consti¬ tute at least about 5 to as much as 60 weight percent of the composition, and preferably about 20 to 50 weight percent thereof. The active oxygen compound may be a conventional perox¬ ide catalyst (e.g., dicumyl peroxide), hydroperoxide cata¬ lyst (e.g., cumene hydroperoxide) or perester catalyst (e.g., tertiary-butyl perbenzoate and tertiary-butyl peroct- oate) . To increase the rate of cure the composition will advantageously include about 0.5 to 5 percent by weight of an organic acid (usually maleic) which is capable of cyclic tautomerism (as more fully described in the aforesaid Bachmann patents) , and about 2 to 6 weight percent of acrylic acid (which will generally increase adhesion, as well) . As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the metal accelerator that is desirably employed may be intro- duced in the form of virtually any compatible and adequately soluble organic or inorganic compound; normally, it will be introduced from the activator formulation. For example, the ferric ion may be provided as ferric sulfate, ferric chlo¬ ride, ferric octoate, or ferrocene; more soluble compounds such as ferric acetylacetonate are however preferred. Cor¬ responding cupric and ferrous salts may be used when those ions are to be present, and other exemplary compounds in¬ clude cobaltous naphthenate, cerium naphtenate, cupric naph¬ thenate, manganese naphthenate, cobaltic acetylacetonate hydrate, vanadium acetylacetonate, and lead linoleate. It will also be appreciated that solubilizing agents for the metal compounds may be employed in appropriate circum¬ stances. The concentration in which the metal ion is used may vary widely, and will depend to an extent upon the other ingredients of the system and the results desired; however, it will usually range from a trace to perhaps one hundred parts per thousand. It has been shown that increasing the amount of metal accelerator can produce a correspondingly pronounced affect upon the rate of cure, albeit that rela¬ tively high concentrations may produce excessive coloration. Indeed, there appears to be a synergistic effect produced by metal ions (especially iron) in combination with an amine- aldehyde activator and a vinyl ether diluent, in that superior bond strength is produced as compared to a compar¬ able system in which the diluent is an inert organic sol- vent. Any of the amine-aldehyde condensation products that are known in the art for curing acrylate monomers may be employed in the activating formulation. However, when the active oxygen compound is a perester particularly desirable results are attained if the amine moiety of the condensation product is aromatic, and most especially when it is aniline, albeit that other aromatic amines such as ethylaniline and o-toluidine may be employed to comparable advantage. When, on the other hand, the active oxygen compound is an hydro- peroxide the aliphatic amine-derived condensation products will often be more effective. While a variety of different aldehydes may be used in the condensation reaction, n-butyr- aldehyde is perhaps the most common, and produces an espe¬ cially effective product when condensed with aniline. Notwithstanding the foregoing discussion, it should be understood that any compound or system that is capable of reaction with an active oxygen compound, to generate free radicals, may be employed herein as the chemical initiator, or activator. In this regard, reference may be had to EXAMPLE ELEVEN, and specific mention might be made of the cobalt/aromatic amine, tetramethyl thiourea, and mercapto- benzothiazine systems; many alternatives are found moreover in the anaerobic adhesives art. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the concentration of amine-aldehyde condensation product, or other chemical initiator employed, will depend upon a number of factors, including the composition of the initiator, the ratio in which the activating and polymerizable formulations are used, and the intended function of the product. Where¬ as, for example, high-speed curing is usually desirable in an adhesive system consisting of two or more parts, the same property may render the system impractical as a potting com¬ pound, due to an inadequate working life. Such factors must moreover be balanced against tensile strength requirements, which will vary depending upon the application in which the composition is to be used. Taking into account all factors, the activating formulation will usually contain 0.5 to 80 weight percent of the free radical-initiating ingredient, with 70 percent being a more typical upper limit; 2 to 5 percent of the ingredient in the activating formulation will generally provide a balance of cure speed and tensile strength that is optimal for adhesive systems, whereas 2 percent or less will generally be optimal for potting com¬ pounds. As noted above, it will often be highly desirable to include a photoinitiator in the composition of the inven- tion, normally as an ingredient of the adhesive formulation; indeed, it will be self-evident that a photoinitiator will be prerequisite to certain applications. For example, photoinitiated compositions are desirably used for the pro¬ duction of conformal coatings, with the chemical mechanism affording shadow curing, and as potting compounds over which a skin may be produced by irradiation, etc. Although suitable photoinitiators are well known in the art, specific illustrative compounds that might be identi¬ fied are dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone (Ciba-Geigy IRGACURE 651) , 1-hydroxycyclohexylphenyl ketone (Ciba-Geigy IRGACURE 184) , and 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-l-phenylpropane-l-one (Ciba- Geigy DAROCUR 1173) . A further listing may be obtained by reference to United States patent No. 4,820,744, particu¬ larly at line 43, column 4 through line 7, column 7. When used, the photoinitiator will normally be included in a con¬ centration of 1 to 8 percent, and preferably no more than 4 percent, based upon the weight of the polymerizable formula- tion. In addition to the components hereinabove described, other materials may be incorporated into the instant compo¬ sitions. For example, "inert" fillers such as wood flour, cornstarch, glass fibers, cotton linters, mica, alumina, silica, and the like, may be used to modify viscosity, im¬ prove impact resistance, and for other purposes, and it is conventional to include small percentages of silane coupling agents to increase moisture resistance as well as to enhance bond strength to glass and similar surfaces. Other sub¬ stances such as dyes, flame retarders, stabilizers (e.g., the quinones and hydroquinones) , viscosity modifiers (thixotropes, thickeners, viscosity reducers) , plasticizers, antioxidants, and the like, may additionally be incorpo- rated. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it should be emphasized that the provision of a thickened, vinyl ether-diluted acti¬ vation formulation, and especially one containing an amine- aldehyde condensation product and an amorphous silica of the kind hereinbefore identified, is regarded to be unique to the present invention. It has in the past been found that the aminealdehyde activators tend to break silica bonds, and thereby reduce the effectiveness of the material; that phe¬ nomenon has not however been observed when the activating formulation diluent is a vinyl ether, used in accordance herewith. Other viscosity modifiers that can be employed to particular advantage include cellulose derivatives (e.g., ethyl cellulose and cellulose acetate butyrate) , polymethyl methacrylate, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, etc. Typically, the additive will be used in a concentration of about 1 to 20 percent based upon the total weight of activating formula¬ tion, depending of course upon the viscosity desired and the nature of the additive. Although the EXAMPLES provided herein utilize metal parts to demonstrate adhesive bonding and coating, it will be understood that the compositions of the invention are effective for use with other materials, notably wood, glass and plastic. Indeed, as mentioned above, the diluent of which the activating formulation is comprised appears to promote surface penetration and to provide better cleaning, thereby improving adhesion to plastics, contaminated sur- faces, and the like. The reactive diluents also appear to protect against oxidation in the activator formulations, and thereby to retard discoloration (e.g.,due to the presence of ferric ion) on aging. Perhaps more significantly, however (and as is demonstrated by EXAMPLE FIVE) , the evident inhi- bition to oxidation that is afforded permits extended am¬ bient exposure following application of the activating for¬ mulation, thereby enabling enhanced flexibility in the tim¬ ing of the steps that are carried out, for example, in a manufacturing operation. Finally, it is unexpectedly found that the instant activating formulations not only promote stronger bonds and better adhesion to substrates, but that they also produce surprising increases in curing rates, as compared to the same activators used either without dilution or as dissolved in conventionally employed inert solvents. Thus, it an be seen that the present invention provides a novel multi-part, solvent-free composition that cures, by free radical-inducing chemical activation, to an adhesive solid, and novel activating formulations suitable for use therein. The diluent employed in the activating formulation is itself copolymerizable with the ingredient(s) of the polymerizable formulation, and it may comprise a mixture of ingredients that function effectively while also affording improved economics. The invention additionally provides methods for bonding, coating, potting and sealing, in which problems and disadvantages stemming from the presence of inert solvents are ameliorated, or entirely avoided.

Claims: THE CLAIMS Having thus described the invention, what is CLAIMED is: 1. A multi-part, solvent-free composition that cures by chemical activation to an adhesive solid, comprising: a polymerizable formulation including at least one polymerizable liquid acrylate ingredient; and an activating formulation including bout 0.5 to 80 per¬ cent by weight of a free radical-initiating ingredient that is capable of generating free radicals when reacted with an active oxygen compound and, conversely, about 20 to 99.5 percent of a reactive diluent, 20 to 100 weight percent of said diluent being a liquid vinyl either compound and any remaining percentage thereof being a liquid epoxy compound, said composition further including an active oxygen compound that is reactive with said initiating ingredient to generate free radicals. 2. The composition of Claim 1 wherein said composition consists of two parts, each part being constituted of one of said formulations, and wherein said polymerizable formula- tion contains said active oxygen compound. 3. The composition of Claim 2 wherein said parts are formulated to react with one another in a 1:1 ratio. 4. The composition of Claim 2 wherein said active oxygen compound is selected from the group consisting of peroxide, hydroperoxide and perester catalysts. 5. The composition of Claim 1 wherein said initiating ingredient comprises an amine-aldehyde condensation product. 6. The composition of Claim 5 wherein said composition further includes a metal accelerator. 7. The composition of Claim 1 wherein said vinyl ether diluent is a compound having the structural formula: (R-C=ά-0) n -Q, in which formula each of the substituents R, R' and R" inde- pendently represents an hydrogen atom, an aliphatic group, or an aromatic group, n is an integer; and Q represents an aliphatic group, an aromatic group, an alkoxy group, a cycloaliphatic group, an ester group, a polyester group, an ether group, a polyether group, a carbamide group, a carba¬ mate group, or an heterocyclic group, each of said groups optionally being further substituted by an hydroxyl or a vinyl group, or both. 8. The composition of Claim 1 wherein said polymeri¬ zable formulation comprises at least one polymerizable acry¬ late monomer, (meth)acrylic acid, at least one elastomeric domain-providing filler, and about 0.5 to 5 percent, by weight thereof, of an organic acid that is capable of cyclic tautomerism. 9. The composition of Claim 1 wherein said composition further includes a photoinitiator in an amount effective to effect polymerization of said polymerizable formulation, when subjected to actinic radiation of appropriate wave- length. 10. A multi-part, solvent-free composition that cures by chemical activation to an adhesive solid, comprising: a polymerizable formulation including at least one polymerizable liquid acrylate monomer, and an active oxygen compound, and an activating formulation including 2 to 80 percent by weight of an amine-aldehyde condensation product providing a free radical-initiating ingredient and, conversely, 20 to 98 percent of a reactive diluent, 20 to 100 weight percent of said diluent being a liquid vinyl either compound and any remaining percentage thereof being a liquid epoxy compound, said active oxygen compound and said initialing ingredient being interactive to generate free radicals. 11. The composition of Claim 10 wherein said vinyl ether diluent is a compound having the structural formula: ψ (R-C=C-0) n -Q, in which formula each of the substituents R, R' and R" inde¬ pendently represents an hydrogen atom, an aliphatic group, or an aromatic group; n is an integer; and Q represents an aliphatic group, an aromatic group, an alkoxy group, a cycloaliphatic group, an ester group, a polyester group, an ether group, a polyether group, a carbamide group, a carba- mate group, or an hetrocyclic group, each of said groups optionally being further substituted by an hydroxyl or a vinyl group, or both. 12. The composition of Claim 10 wherein said acti- vating formulation further includes a metal accelerator. 13. A multi-part, solvent-free composition that cures to an adhesive solid by chemical activation and by photoini- tiation, comprising: a polymerizable formulation including at least one polymerizable liquid acrylate monomer; an activating formulation including about 0.5 to 80 percent by weight of a free radical-initiating ingredient that is capable of generating free radicals when reacted with an active oxygen compound and, conversely, about 20 to 99.5 percent of a reactive diluent, 20 to 100 weight percent of said diluent being a liquid vinyl either compound and any remaining percentage thereof being a liquid epoxy compound; an active oxygen compound that is reactive with said initiating ingredient to generate free radicals; and a photoinitiator for effecting polymerization of said polymerizable formulation when said composition is subjected to actinic radiation of appropriate wavelength. 14. In a method for bonding surfaces to one another, the steps comprising: providing the multi-part composition of Claim 1, said activating formulation including at least about 2 weight percent of said free radical-initiating ingredient; applying said formulations to at least one surface that is to be bonded; and bringing another surface that is to be bonded into sub¬ stantial contact with said one surface under such conditions as to effect admixture of said formulations between said surfaces. 15. The method of Claim 14 wherein one of said formu- lations is applied to each of said one surface and said an¬ other surface. 16. The method of Claim 14 wherein said composition consists of two parts, each part being constituted of one of said formulations, and wherein said parts are formulated to react with one another in a 1:1 ratio. 17. The method of Claim 16 wherein said parts are of substantially the same viscosity. 18. The method of Claim 14 wherein said composition further includes a photoinitiator in an amount effective to effect polymerization of said polymerizable formulation, when subjected to actinic radiation of appropriate wave- length, and wherein said method includes a further step of subjecting at least a portion of said admixture to such radiation. 19. In a method for producing an adherent deposit upon a surface, the steps comprising: providing the multi-part composition of Claim 1; admixing said formulations; and applying the resultant admixture to said surface. 20. The method of Claim 19 wherein admixture is ap¬ plied as a coating to said surface. 21. The method of Claim 19 wherein said surface de¬ fines a cavity, and wherein said admixture is applied as a potting compound to substantially fill said cavity. 22. The method of Claim 19 wherein said surface de¬ fines a crevice, and wherein said admixture is applied over said crevice to effect sealing thereof. 23. The method Claim 19 wherein said composition fur¬ ther includes a photoinitiator in an amount effective to effect polymerization of said polymerizable formulation, when subjected to actinic radiation of appropriate wave- length, and wherein said method includes a further step of subjecting at least a portion of said admixture to such ra¬ diation. 24. An activating formulation consisting essentially of about 0.5 to 80 percent by weight of a free radical-ini- tiating ingredient that is capable of generating free radi¬ cals when reacted with an active oxygen compound and, con¬ versely, about 20 to 99.5 percent of a reactive diluent, 20 to 100 weight percent of said diluent being a liquid vinyl either compound and any remaining percentage thereof being a liquid epoxy compound. 25. The formulation of Claim 24 wherein said initiat- ing ingredient comprises an amine-aldehyde condensation pro¬ duct. 26. The formulation of Claim 25 wherein said formula¬ tion further includes a metal accelerator. 27. The formulation of Claim 24 wherein said formula- tion further includes about 1 to 20 weight percent of a cis- cosity modifier that is effective to thicken said formula¬ tion.

Inventors: BACHMANN ANDREW G, CANTOR STEPHEN E, BACHMANN, ANDREW, G., CANTOR, STEPHEN, E.
Applicants: DYMAX CORP, DYMAX CORPORATION
Application year: 1994
Main classification: C08F2
IPC codes: C08F2, C08F4, C09D4, C09J4