ACTIVE MATRIX LIQUID CRYSTAL SUBTRACTIVE COLOR DISPLAY WITH INTEGRAL LIGHT CONFINEMENT

Abstract: Telecentric afocal microlens combinations (68, 70) are inserted between the liquid crystal cells (12, 20, 26) of an active matrix liquid crystal subtractive color display to retain light within a projection of each liquid crystal pixel as the light propagates through the system. A resulting reduction in light losses at the edge of each pixel significantly improves the output brightness and resolution.

Description: ACTIVE MATRIX LIQUID CRYSTAL SUBTRACTIVE COLOR DISPLAY WITH INTEGRAL LIGHT CONFINEMENT BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention This invention relates to active matrix subtractive color displays, and more particularly to miniature displays which use liquid crystals as polarization rotation elements and retain light propagation through the display mechanism within projections of the liquid crystal pixels. Description of the Related Art Active matrix liquid crystal cells that are divided into an array of pixels, with the liquid crystal alignment within each pixel subject to independent electronic con¬ trol, are well known. A portion of such an active matrix array is illustrated in FIG. 1. A grid of electrical lead lines 2 provide activating signals to control transistors 4 within each pixel 6 of the cell. Transparent plate elec¬ trodes (not shown) are provided over the front and rear surfaces of each pixel, and an electric field is estab¬ lished between the electrodes for each pixel in accordance with the signal applied to the pixel transistor 4. The liquid crystals within each pixel assume an angular orien¬ tation that varies with the field strength. The liquid crystal orientation in turn establishes a polarization di¬ rection for light transmitted through the pixels. The po- larization angle of polarized light transmitted through each pixel can thus be controlled by applying a desired pattern of electrical signals to the various pixel transis¬ tors. Active matrixes have been used in the past in sub- tractive color displays, such as that disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,416,514, issued November 22, 1983. The basic construction of this device is illustrated in the exploded view of FIG. 2 for a single pixel; an array of many such pixels would normally be employed. A light source 8 illu¬ minates a color-neutral linear polarizer plate 10. Next in line is a liquid crystal cell 12 that rotates the polariza¬ tion angle of the various pixels up to 90°. This is fol¬ lowed in succession by a cyan color linear polarizer 14 with a polarization axis 16 at right angles to the polar¬ ization axis 18 of neutral linear polarizer 10, another liquid crystal cell 20 that has an unenergized polarization axis perpendicular to that of cell 12, a magenta color lin¬ ear polarizer 22 whose polarization axis 24 is perpendicu¬ lar to that of the cyan polarizer 16, a third liquid crys¬ tal cell 26 whose unenergized polarization axis is perpen- dicular to that of cell 20 and parallel to that of cell 12, and finally a yellow color linear polarizer 28 whose polar¬ ization axis 30 is perpendicular to that of polarizers 10 and 22, and parallel to that of polarizer 14. The liquid crystal cell 12 consists of a liquid crys- tal layer 32 sandwiched between transparent electrodes 34, 36, with an electrical input at 38 to control the voltage across the electrode plates. Similarly, the liquid crystal cell 20 consists of a liquid crystal layer 40 bounded by transparent electrode plates 42, 44 with an electrical in- put 46, and cell 26 consists of a liquid crystal layer 48 bounded by transparent electrode plates 50, 52 with an electrical input 54. In practice, each of the liquid crystal "cells" 12, 20, 26 is a single pixel within a much larger pixel array, with each of the pixels independently controlled. The as- sembly functions as a subtractive color display by applying electrical signals to each of the cells that cause their liquid crystals to assume desired angular orientations, such as θl, Θ2 and 03 as illustrated. The light from source 8 which emerges from neutral polarizer 10 is hori¬ zontally polarized. Color polarizers 14, 22 and 28 respec¬ tively filter out red, green and blue. The amount of fil¬ tering varies with the difference between the polarization angle of each polarizer and the polarization angle of the light incident on that polarizer; full filtering is achieved with a 90° difference, while no filtering results from parallel polarization angles. Depending upon the po¬ larization rotation imparted by each of the liquid crystal cells, the viewer sees a gamut of color hue, saturation and brightness. When used in miniaturized applications, such as helmet mounted displays, there is a significant problem of light loss as the light is processed through the display. For example, a 1,024x1,280 pixel display with three color sub- tractions will have a total of 3x1024x1280=3,932,160 indi¬ vidually energized liquid crystal pixels. For miniaturized displays, the center-to-center spacing between liquid crys¬ tal pixels may be about 25 micrometers (microns) and the total pixel areas may be about 25x25 microns, of which the transparent area occupies about 18x18 microns. Collimated light from a point source, after passing through the trans¬ parent area of each pixel, is diffracted into increasingly greater diverging angles as the size of the pixel is re¬ duced. For an 18x18 micron pixel, the light intensity at a distance of 2mm from the pixel drops to approximately 7% of the intensity at about 0.2mm. This loss of light is aggravated if the input beam is divergent rather than col¬ limated. The light spreading has a very detrimental effect for subtractive color displays. Whereas the light that passes through each pixel of the first liquid crystal layer will ideally pass through the corresponding pixels in the subse¬ quent layers, the effect of light spreading is that a por¬ tion of the light from a given pixel in the first layer will be transmitted to non-corresponding pixels in subse¬ quent layers, or lost from the display completely if the pixel is in the vicinity of the periphery. This results in a degradation of both resolution and brightness. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention seeks to provide an active ma¬ trix liquid crystal subtractive color display that is sub¬ ject to miniaturization with a much lower loss in both brightness and resolution. This goal is accomplished with a system in which a compact light confinement mechanism is provided between each of the polarization rotating liquid crystal cells, and also between the last liquid crystal cell and an image sur¬ face. The light confiners are implemented on a pixelized basis by pairs of telecentric afocal lenslet arrays, with the lenslets of each array substantially aligned, with and substantially equal in size and focal length to, corre¬ sponding lenslets in the other arrays. Successive lenslet arrays are spaced from each other by approximately two fo- cal lengths, and are oriented counter to each other to in¬ hibit light spreading between the liquid crystal cells, and between the last cell and the image surface. With the use of the telecentric afocal microlenses and the subtractive color display, improvements of greater than an order of magnitude have been noted in the amount of light that is successfully transmitted to the correct loca¬ tion on the image surface. Further features and advantages of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, taken together with the accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is fragmentary idealized view showing a pixel- ized portion of an active matrix liquid crystal display; FIG. 2 is an exploded perspective view illustrating in diagrammatic form a prior active matrix liquid crystal sub¬ tractive color display, , described above; FIG. 3 is an optical diagram illustrating a partial approach to solving the light loss problem; FIG. 4 is an optical diagram illustrating the approach taken by the invention to solving the loss of light problem in a subtractive color display; FIGs. 5 and 6 are optical diagrams illustrating alter¬ nate lens configurations to the embodiment of FIG. 4; FIG. 7 is a section view of a microlens array that can be used for the invention; FIG. 8 is an exploded perspective view in block dia¬ gram format of an active matrix liquid crystal subtractive color display system that uses the invention; and FIG. 9 is a table of optical intensities at various locations in subtractive color displays with and without the invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The invention uses a series of microlens arrays to re- image each pixel from one liquid crystal layer to the next, and from the last liquid crystal layer to an image surface. Thus, for a 1,024x1,280 pixel array, 1,310,720 microlenses are required between each layer. The microlenses are con¬ figured so as to restrict the transmission of light between successive cells within projections of the pixels. Simple microlens arrays, however, are unsuitable for this purpose. This is illustrated in FIG. 3, in which three liquid crystal cells 12, 20 and 26 are illustrated, along with a display screen 56 that presents an image sur- face to the nearest liquid crystal cell 26. The same ref- erence numbers are used for the active matrix liquid crys¬ tal cells as in FIG. 2, indicating that the same cell structures can be employed. In this figure the color po¬ larizers are not shown for purposes of simplification, but in reality they would be present. Focusing lenses 58, 60 and 62 are positioned midway between successive pairs of cells, and between the last cell 26 and the projection screen 56. The lenses are im¬ plemented as microlenses that are replicated on a pixelized basis across the cell area; only one pixel is illustrated in FIG. 3. Microlens 58 successfully images the liquid crystal cell 12 onto the next liquid crystal cell 20 (the chief rays 64 and marginal rays 66 are indicated by dashed and solid lines, respectively) . However, the chief ray 64 exits the system before it reaches the second microlens 60. This represents a light loss that grows worse as the re¬ maining light propagates towards the projection screen. The solution proposed by the invention is illustrated in FIG. 4, in which the liquid crystal cells 12, 20 and 26 are again identified by the same reference numerals, as is projection screen 56. A pair of microlens lenslets 68 and 70 are positioned between the liquid crystal cells 12 and 24, while similar lenslet pairs 72, 74 and 76, 78 are posi¬ tioned respectively between liquid crystal cells 20 and 26, and between cell 26 and screen 56. In this figure the col¬ or polarizers 14, 22 and 28 are also shown. Each pair of lenslets is fabricated and arranged in a similar manner, so that the following description of lens¬ lets 68 and 70 also applies to the other lenslet pairs. Each pair of lenslets is preferably equal in size to the other pairs, and is aligned along a common optical axis that extends through the center of the liquid crystal pix¬ els. The first lenslet 68 is spaced one focal length f from the first liquid crystal cell 12, while the second lenslet 70 is spaced an equal distance f from the second liquid crystal cell 20. The two lenslets are spaced apart by a distance 2f, and are oriented counter to each other. The first lenslet 68 focuses collimated light (chief ray 80) from the first liquid crystal cell 12 onto the first color polarizer 14, where it crosses over the optical axis 82 and continues onto a corresponding location on the opposite side of the second lenslet 70. There it is recollimated and projected through the second liquid crystal cell 20 to the second lenslet pair 72, 74. The chief ray 80 is thus restricted to a projection 84 of the liquid crystal pixels for the successive cells, and is not lost to the system. Marginal rays such as ray 86, which originate at the center of the pixel for liquid crystal cell 12 and is di- rected towards the outer edge of lens 68, are similarly restricted to the pixel projection. Rays 86 are collimated by the first microlens 68, and then focused by the second microlens 70 onto the second liquid crystal cell 20. They cross over the optical axis at cell 20 and continue on to the first lenslet 72 of the second pair, where they are again collimated. The arrangement of FIG. 4 assumes that the index of refraction of the lenslets is greater than that of the me¬ dium between the lenslets. This is the case, for example, with lenslets formed from flint glass (refractive index = 1.7) , and BK-7 glass (a standard glass produced by Schott Optical Company, refractive index = 1.517) is the medium between lenslets. FIG. 5 illustrates the solution if the index of re- fraction for the lenslets is less than that of the medium between lenslets. This would be the case, for example, for lenslets implemented with shaped air gaps, with a refrac¬ tive index of 1.0. The lenslet 68• , 70', 72' , 74 » , 76' , 78' are positioned in a manner similar to the corresponding lenslets in FIG. 4, but they are now concave rather than convex. In practice, the optimum index of refraction for the lenslets should be fairly close to that of the inter¬ vening medium to reduce Fresnel reflection losses at each medium/lenslet interface. Another lenslet variation that can make the assembly even smaller is illustrated in FIG. 6. In this embodiment, the lenslets are implemented with kinoform lenslets 68", 70", 72", 74", 76", 78". A kinoform lens is a Fresnel lens whose thickness is reset to a minimum value whenever it reaches one wavelength of the incident light. The kinoform can be made using binary optics to achieve a "stair step" approximation of the lens shape. Although some reduction in lens thickness is possible with this approach, the lens¬ lets of FIG. 4 are already very thin, and the additional practical benefit to be obtained from kinoform lenslets is not great. Each pair of lenslets between liquid crystal cells is referred to herein as a telecentric afocal microlens pair. The term "telecentric" refers to the fact that the chief rays are parallel to the optical axis in the image space, while the lenslets are "afocal" because the lenslet pairs do not focus an input collimated beam onto the next liquid crystal cell, i.e., the spacing between the two lenslets is 2f. A section of a microlens array that can be used in the invention is illustrated in FIG. 7. The microlenses are fabricated on a substrate 88, such as BK-7 glass. The lenslet areas 90 are formed in the substrate, and are filled with an optical cement or epoxy having the desired refractive index. Several methods are available for manufacturing the microlenses. One is referred to as Laser Assisted Con¬ trolled Etching (LACE) , and is described in U.S. Patent No. 5,148, 319, issued September 15, 1992 to Gratrix et al. In this method a finely focused laser beam is used to write a variable intensity pattern on a linear photoresist. The variable intensity pattern causes the photoresist to harden as a function of the intensity. The exposed photoresist is placed in an acid etch to remove its unhardened portion, the depth of the etch in the photoresist being a function of the laser writing beam intensity. The profiled micro¬ lens pattern is then transferred to glass and filled with a glass or optical epoxy of the desired refractive index. Another technique for fabricating the microlenses is to defocus the laser beam to the desired diameter of the microlens during the exposure of the linear photoresist. For square microlenses, a square opaque mask in contact with the photoresist is used. The intensity profile of the laser beam is adjusted to the desired intensity profile by apodizing the beam. A common method used to apodize the beam is to spin a slit of varying width in the beam; the advantage of this technique is that no scanning is re¬ quired. An x-y stepping assembly is used to move to the next microlens location, but remains stationary during the local photoresist exposure. An alternate microlens fabrication technique involves plasma etching. It is described in U.S. patent application Serial No. 08/046,060, filed April 12, 1992 by Gratix. Other fabrication methods may also be useful, such as the ion implantation method normally used to manufacture gradi¬ ent index lenses. In general, the focusing properties of the microlenses can be controlled by adjusting the lens curvature and/or its index of refraction. A greater refractive index allows for a shallower curvature, and thus a thinner device. In cases where the fabrication process does not allow for fine control of the radius of curvature, the lenslets can be manufactured to an approximate radius of curvature, with final adjustments made by mixing the optical cements used for the lenslets to obtain a precise refractive index that corresponds to the actual radius. An overall subtractive color display implemented with the invention is shown in FIG. 8; the same reference num¬ bers are used as in previous figures for common elements. Light from a source such as a xenon lamp 92 is directed through a chroma notch filter 94 to provide any desired bandwidth alteration, and focused by a coupling lens 96 into an optical fiber pipe 98, which includes any necessary optical coupling mechanism 100. The opposite end 102 of the light pipe illuminates a kinoform collimator plate 104, which provides the input for the linear polarizer 10. A telecentric afocal microlens array 106 is provided between the linear polarizer 10 and the first liquid crystal cell 12 to prevent loss of light, in a manner similar to that described above. The individual pixels of the liquid crys¬ tal cells 12, 20 and 26 are controlled by video signals that are transmitted over lines 108, 110 and 112 from a suitable video control 114. When the color display is used as a helmet mounted display, the projection screen 56 i ag- es onto the helmet's visor optics relay lens 116. Significant improvements have been noted with the in¬ vention in retaining optical power during transmission through the system. The system that was studied employed square microlenses with sides about 25 microns long, focal lengths of about 622 microns radii of curvature of about 75 microns, and a SAG of about 1.074. The liquid crystal pix¬ els transparent area had sides about 18 microns long. The lenslets were larger than the liquid crystal pixels trans¬ parent area because they extended into the electrical sup- ply area between adjacent pixels; as used herein, confining or restricting the light to the pixel projections also in¬ cludes confining the light to the projected peripheries of the lenslets when the lenslets are somewhat larger than the liquid crystal pixels transparent area themselves. T h e relative optical powers at each liquid crystal cell and at the projection screen were obtained, with and without the telecentric afocal microlenses of the invention, at a wave¬ length of 530nm and with light sources that included a point source and 20, 40 and 60 milliradian sources. The results are summarized in FIG. 9, with the optical power at the first liquid crystal station 12 providing a normalizing reference. The optical powers obtained with the invention are listed in the columns headed INV, while the results without the invention are listed under the columns headed by W/0. In each case, optical power improvements well over an order of magnitude were achieved at the projection screen. While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, numerous variations and alternate embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. For example, polarization rotation elements other than liquid crystal cells may be developed that could be used with the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only in terms of the appended claims.

Claims: Claims: 1. A subtractive color display having a linear po¬ larizer (10) positioned to receive and linearly polarize light from a source location (8) , a plurality of color pol¬ arizers (14, 22,28) positioned successively in the path (80,86) of polarized light from said linear polarizer, and respective pixelized polarization rotation arrays posi¬ tioned between each pair of successive polarizers, said polarization rotation arrays including mutually aligned ar¬ rays of independently programmable polarization rotation pixels (12,20,26) for rotating the polarization of incident light from said linear polarizer by programmed amounts, characterized by: respective optical confiners (68,70,72,74) posi¬ tioned between each pair of successive polarization rota¬ tion arrays, said optical confiners substantially confining the transmission of light between said polarization rota¬ tion arrays to projections (84) of said pixels. 2. The subtractive color display of claim 1, said pixelized polarization rotation arrays comprising respec¬ tive active matrix liquid crystal cells. 3. The subtractive color display of claim 1, further comprising an image surface (56) on the opposite side of said polarization rotation arrays from said linear polariz¬ er, and an additional optical confiner (76,78) positioned between said image surface and its nearest polarization rotation array, said additional optical confiner substan¬ tially confining the transmission of light between said nearest polarization rotation array and said image surface to projections of said polarization rotation pixels. 4. The subtractive color display of claim 1, said optical confiners comprising respective arrays of afocal lenslet pairs, with each lenslet pair encompassing a re- spective pixel projection.

Inventors: ANSLEY DAVID A, ANSLEY, DAVID, A.
Applicants: HUGHES TRAINING INC, HUGHES TRAINING, INC.
Application year: 1994
Main classification: G02F1
IPC codes: G02B3, G02F1