HOMOLOGOUSLY RECOMBINANT SLOW GROWING MYCOBACTERIA AND USES THEREFOR

Abstract: A method of transforming slow-growing mycobacteria, such as M. bovis BCG, M. leprae, M. tuberculosis, M. avium, M. intracellulare and M. africanum; a method of manipulating genomic DNA of slow-growing mycobacteria through homologous recombination; a method of producing homologously recombinant (HR) slow-growing mycobacteria in which heterologous DNA is integrated into the genomic DNA at a homologous locus; homologously recombinant (HR) slow-growing mycobacteria having heterologous DNA integrated into their genomic DNA at a homologous locus; and mycobacteria DNA useful as a genetic marker.

Description: HOMOLOGOUSLY RECOMBINANT SLOW GROWING MYCOBACTERIA AND USES THEREFOR Description Background of the Invention The World Health Organization estimates that one in three human beings is believed to be infected with Myco- bacterium tuberculosis (Styblo, K. , Reviews of Infectious Diseases. Vol. II, Suppl. 2, March-April, 1989; Bloom and Murray, Science 252:1055-1067, 1992) . Over the past decade, there has been a recent resurgence in the inci¬ dence of tuberculosis in developed countries that has coincided with the AIDS epidemic (Snider and Roper, N. England J. Med. 326:703-705 (1992)) . Because of their impact as major human pathogens and as a result of their profound immunostimulatory properties, mycobacteria have long been intensively studied. In the early 1900s, an attenuated mycobacterium, Mvcobacterium(M. ) bovis Bacille Calmette-Guerin (M. bovis BCG or BCG) , was isolated for use as a vaccine against tuberculosis (Cal ette e_t al. Acad. Natl. Med. (Paris) . 91 . :787-796, 1924; reviewed in Collins, F.M., Bacterial Vaccines (R. Germanier, ed.), Academic Press, pp. 373-418, 1984) . Although the efficacy of this vaccine against tuberculosis varied considerably in different trials, and the reasons for its variable efficacy have yet to be resolved, BCG is among the most widely used human vaccines (Luelmo, F., Am. Rev. Respir. Pis. 125:70-72, 1982; Fine, P.E.M., Reviews of Infectious Diseases II (supp. 2) , 5353-5359, 1989) . The recent application of molecular biological tech- nology to the study of mycobacteria has led to the identi¬ fication of many of the major antigens that are targets of the immune response to infection by mycobacteria (Kauf- mann, S.H.E., Immunol. Today 11:129-136, 1990; Young, R.A., Ann. Rev. Immunol. 8 . :401-420, 1990; Young et. al. , Academic Press Ltd. , London, pp. 1-35, 1990; Young et. al. , Mol. Microbiol . 6_:133-145, 1992)) and to an improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in resistance to antimycobacterial antibiotics (Zhang et. al. , Nature 358:591-593. 1992; Telenti et al. , Lancet 341:647- 650, 1993) . The development of tools that permit mole- cular genetic manipulation of mycobacteria has also al¬ lowed the construction of recombinant BCG vaccine vehicles (Snapper et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:6987-6991, 1988; Husson et al. , J. Bacteriol. 172:519-524, 1990; Martin et al. , B. Nature 345:739-743, 1990; Snapper et al., Mol. Microbiol. 4:1911-1919. 1990; Aldovini and Young, Nature 351:479-482, 1991; Jacobs et al. , Methods Enzvmol. 204:537-555, 1991; Lee et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3111-3115. 1991; Stover et al., Nature 351: 456-460, 1991; Winter et al. , Gene 109:47-54, 1991; Donnelly-Wu et al. , Mol. Microbiol. 7:407-417, 1993)) . Genome mapping and sequencing projects are providing valuable information about the M ^ . tuberculosis and M. leprae genomes that will facilitate further study of the biology of these pathogens (Eiglmeier et al . . , Mol. Micro- biol.. in press, 1993; Young and Cole, J. Bacteriol. 175:1-6, 1993) . Despite these advances, there are two serious limita¬ tions to our ability to manipulate these organisms geneti¬ cally. First, very few mycobacterial genes that can be used as genetic markers have been isolated (Donnelly-Wu et al. , Mol. Microbiol. 7:407-417, 1993)) . In addition, investigators have failed to obtain homologous recombina¬ tion in slow growing mycobacteria, such as NL, tuberculosis and M_-_ bovis BCG (Kalpana et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA M:5433-5447, 1991; Young and Cole, J. Bacteriol. 175:1-6. 1993)), although homologous recombination has been accomplished in the fast growing Mvcobacteriu smeg- matis (Husson et al. , J. Bacteriol. 172 : 519-524, 1990) ) . Summary of the Invention Described herein is a method of transforming slow- growing mycobacteria, such as IL bovis BCG, M ^ leprae. M. tuberculosis M. avium, M. intracellulare and M_;_ africanum; a method of manipulating genomic DNA of slow-growing mycobacteria through homologous recombination; a method of producing homologously recombinant (HR) slow-growing mycobacteria in which heterologous DNA is integrated into the genomic DNA at a homologous locus; homologously recom¬ binant (HR) slow-growing mycobacteria having heterologous DNA integrated into their genomic DNA at a homologous locus; and mycobacterial DNA useful as a genetic marker. Applicants have succeeded in introducing heterologous DNA into (i.e., transforming) slow-growing mycobacteria through the use of electroporation in water (rather than in buffer) . In the present method of transforming slow- growing mycobacteria, heterologous DNA (such as linear DNA or plasmid DNA) and slow-growing mycobacteria (e.g., M. bovis BCG, _ s _ leprae, M. tuberculosis M. avium. M. intracellulare and M. africanum) are combined and the resulting combination is subjected to electroporation at an appropriate potential and capacitance for sufficient time for the heterologous DNA to enter the slow growing mycobacteria, resulting in the production of transformed mycobacteria containing the heterologous DNA. In one embodiment, heterologous DNA and _ bovis BCG are combined and subjected to electroporation in water. In a particu¬ lar embodiment, the M ^ _ bovis BCG-heterologous DNA combina¬ tion is subjected to electroporation in water at settings of approximately 2.5kV potential and approximately 25 μF capacitance. Optionally, prior to harvest, cells to be transformed are exposed to glycine (such as by adding 1-2% glycine to culture medium in which the slow-grow mycobac¬ teria are growing) in order to enhance or improve trans- formation efficiencies. In one embodiment, 1.5% glycine is added to the culture medium 24 hours prior to harvest¬ ing of the cells, which are then combined with heterolo¬ gous DNA to be introduced into the slow-growing mycobacte¬ ria. The resulting combination is subjected to electro- poration, preferably in water, as described above. In a further embodiment of the method of transforming slow growing mycobacteria, cultures of the cells are maintained in (continuously propagated in) mid-log growth, in order to increase the fraction of cells which are undergoing DNA synthesis (and which, thus, are competent to take up heterologous DNA) . Cultures of cells main¬ tained in log-phase growth are subjected to. electropo¬ ration, preferably in water and, as a result, are trans¬ formed with the heterologous DNA. As described above, efficiency of transformation can be increased by exposing the slow-growing mycobacteria to glycine prior to electro¬ poration. Thus, in this embodiment, slow-growing mycobac¬ teria in log-phase growth are combined with heterologous DNA (e.g., plasmid DNA, linearized DNA) to be introduced into the slow-growing mycobacteria. The resulting combi¬ nation is subjected to electroporation (preferably in water) , under conditions (potential and capacitance set¬ tings and sufficient time) appropriate for transformation of the cells. Optionally, prior to electroporation, the log-phase cells are exposed to glycine (e.g., approximate¬ ly 1-2% glycine added to culture medium) in order to en¬ hance transformation efficiency. Heterologous DNA introduced into slow-growing myco¬ bacteria is DNA from any source other than the recipient mycobacterium. It can be homologous to DNA present in the recipient mycobacterial genomic DNA, nonhomologous or both. DNA which is homologous to mycobacterial genomic DNA is introduced into the genomic DNA by homologous recombination or integration. Alternatively, the heterol- ogous DNA introduced by the present method can be nonhomo¬ logous and, thus, enter mycobacterial genomic DNA by random integration events or remain extrachromosomal (unintegrated) after it enters the mycobacterium. In addition, in one embodiment of the present method, non- homologous DNA linked to or inserted within DNA homologous to genomic DNA of the recipient mycobacterium is intro¬ duced into genomic DNA of the recipient mycobacterium as a result of homologous recombination which occurs between genomic DNA and the homologous DNA to which the nonhomo- logous DNA is linked (or in which it is inserted) . For example, as described herein, a mycobacterial gene which encodes a genetic marker has been identified and isolated and used to target homologous integration of heterologous DNA (DNA homologous to genomic DNA of the mycobacterial recipient, alone or in conjunction with DNA not homologous to genomic DNA of recipient mycobacteria) into genomic DNA of a slow-growing mycobacterium. Specifically, the M. bovis BCG gene encoding orotidine-5- monophosphate decarb- oxylase (OMP DCase) (uraA) has been isolated, as has DNA flanking OMP DCase. The OMP DCase gene and the flanking DNA have been sequenced. The mycobacterial DNA containing the uraA locus, modified to contain heterologous DNA (a selectable marker gene) has been used to carry out inte¬ gration of the heterologous DNA (the mycobacterial DNA and the selectable marker gene) into mycobacterial genomic DNA, resulting in production of homologously recombinant mycobacteria containing the heterologous DNA of a homolo¬ gous locus. Specifically, V _ bovis BCG DNA containing the uraA locus and flanking sequences was modified to replace the OMP DCase coding sequence with the Kan r selectable marker gene (aph) . The resulting construct, which includ¬ ed approximately 1.5 kb uraA flanking sequences on each side of the selectable marker gene, was transformed into M. bovis BCG, using the method described above. M ^ . bovis BCG cultures in mid-log growth were subjected to electro¬ poration in water, resulting in transformation of cells with the construct. Transformants were selected for further study, which showed that all transformants as¬ sessed contained vector DNA integrated into the genome and that in some of the transformants, the transforming DNA had integrated at the homologous genomic locus. Thus, heterologous DNA of interest has been introduced into genomic DNA of slow-growing mycobacteria through homolo¬ gous recombination, to produce homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacteria in which the heterologous DNA is integrated into the homologous genomic locus (a genomic locus homologous to at least a portion of the heterologous DNA) . Heterologous DNA which includes DNA homologous to genomic DNA of the recipient mycobacterium (homologous DNA) and DNA which is not homologous to genomic DNA of the recipient mycobacterium (nonhomologous DNA) can be intro¬ duced into (transformed into) slow growing mycobacterium by the present method for several purposes. As described herein, heterologous nonhomologous DNA encoding a product to be expressed by the resulting homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacterium has been introduced into myco¬ bacterial genomic DNA at a locus homologous with addition¬ al sequences to which the nonhomologous DNA is linked. In this embodiment, the DNA construct transformed into recip¬ ient slow-growing mycobacteria comprises homologous DNA, which directs or targets introduction of the heterologous DNA into the homologous locus of the mycobacterial genome, and nonhomologous DNA, which is expressed in transformed homologously recombinant mycobacteria. In this embodi¬ ment, the nonhomologous DNA is introduced into mycobacte¬ rial genomic DNA in such a manner that it is added to the genomic DNA or replaces genomic DNA. In a second embodi¬ ment, heterologous DNA integrated into genomic DNA is not expressed in the recipient cells. In this embodiment, the DNA construct includes homologous DNA for targeting into a homologous genomic locus and DNA which acts to knock out (inactivate) or activate a resident mycobacterial gene. In the case of inactivation, the mycobacterial gene is "knocked out", in the sense that it is rendered inactive by addition of DNA whose presence interferes with its ability to function, by removal or replacement of se¬ quences necessary for it to be functional or by its com¬ plete removal from the mycobacterial genome. In the case of activation, the heterologous DNA integrated into the genomic DNA turns on or enhances expression of a mycobac¬ terial gene, such as by introducing a heterologous promot¬ er which controls the mycobacterial gene expression. In the embodiment in which heterologous DNA affects expres- sion of an endogenous mycobacterial gene, the homologous DNA can serve both functions (i.e., the targeting and inactivation/activating functions) ; if that is the case, the DNA construct includes only homologous DNA. Alterna¬ tively, the DNA construct can include homologous DNA (for targeting purposes) and nonhomologous DNA (for altering function of the mycobacterial gene) . Homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacteria of the present invention are useful, for example, as vehicles in which proteins encoded by the heterologous nonhomo- logous DNA are expressed. They are useful as vaccines, which express a polypeptide or a protein of interest (or more than one polypeptide or protein) , such as an antigen or antigens of one or more pathogens against which pro¬ tection is desired (e.g., to prevent or treat a disease or condition caused by the pathogen) . Pathogens of interest include viruses, retroviruses, bacteria, mycobacteria, other microorganisms, organisms or substances (e.g., toxins or toxoids) which cause a disease or condition to be prevented, treated or reversed. The homologously recombinant slow-growing bacteria can also be used to express enzymes, immunopotentiators, lymphokines, pharma- cologic agents, antitumor agents (e.g., cytokines) , or stress proteins (useful for evoking or enhancing an immune response or inducing tolerance in an autoimmune disease) . For example, homologously recombinant slow-growing myco¬ bacteria of the present invention can express polypeptides or proteins which are growth inhibitors or are cytocidal for tumor cells (e.g., interferon a, β or γ, interleukins 1-7, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) a or β) and, thus, are useful for treating certain human cancers (e.g., bladder cancers, melanomas) . Homologously recombinant slow- growing mycobacteria of the present invention are also useful vehicles to elicit protective immunity in a host, such as a human or other vertebrate. They can be used to produce humoral antibody immunity, cellular immunity and/or mucosal or secretory immunity. The antigens ex¬ pressed by the homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacteria, useful as vaccines or as diagnostic re¬ agents, are also the subject of the present invention. In addition, homologously recombinant slow-growing myco¬ bacteria of the present invention are useful as vaccines in which the heterologous DNA introduced through homo¬ logous integration is not itself expressed, but acts to knock out a mycobacterial gene necessary for pathogenicity • of the slow-growing mycobacterium or its growth in vivo. Such homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacteria are useful as vaccines to provide protection against diseases caused by the corresponding wild-type myco¬ bacterium or as a vaccine vehicle which contains a gene(s) encoding an antigen(s) of a different pathogen(s) (e.g., as a vaccine to provide protection against an organism other than the corresponding wild-type mycobacterium or against a toxin or toxoid) . The vaccine of the present invention has important advantages over presently available vaccines. For exam¬ ple, mycobacteria have adjuvant properties; they stimulate a recipient's . immune system to respond to other antigens with great effectiveness. In addition, the mycobacterium stimulates long-term memory or immunity. This means that a single (one time) inoculation can be used to produce long-term sensitization to protein antigens. Long-lasting T cell memory, which stimulates secondary antibody re¬ sponse neutralizing to the infectious agent or toxic. This is particularly useful, for example, against tetanus and diphtheria toxins, pertussis, malaria, influenza, herpes viruses and snake venoms. BCG in particular has important advantages as a vaccine vehicle. For example, it can be used repeatedly in an individual and has had a very low incidence of adverse effects. In addition, BCG, as well as other mycobacteria, have a large genome (approximately 3xl0 6 bp in length) . As a result, a large amount of heterologous DNA can be accommodated within (incorporated into) the mycobacterial genome, which means that a large gene or multiple genes (e.g., DNA encoding antigens for more than • ll- one pathogen) can be inserted into genomic DNA, such as by homologous recombination. In another embodiment of the present invention, the method of homologous recombination is used to manipulate the genome of a mycobacterium, such as M. tuberculosis, in order to attenuate the organism and render it more suit¬ able for vaccine purposes (e.g., to render M. tuberculosis more suitable for use as a tuberculosis vaccine which would induce a protective response and minimize or reduce the risk of disease to the recipient) . For example, a gene or genes encoding a product responsible for pathoge¬ nicity of the organism can be deleted or inactivated (e.g., by disruption) . For V _ tuberculosis. such genes include, but are not limited to, the katG gene, the Hsp60 gene, aroA, lysA, uraA and the M ^ _ tuberculosis DNA associ¬ ated with entry into and survival inside cells. The heterologous DNA used includes DNA homologous to genomic DNA of M. tuberculosis, which is introduced into genomic DNA in a location which results in deletion or disruption of the NL . tuberculosis gene(s), resulting in attenuation of the M. tuberculosis. Brief Description of the Figures Figure 1 is a structural and functional map of the M. bovis BCG uraA locus, in which a restriction map of the uraA locus and the recombinant insert DNAs for several plasmids used to study this region are depicted. The relative positions of the BCG uraA gene and the portions of other genes identified are summarized graphically and the ability of each recombinant to complement the E. coli pyrF mutant is indicated. Figure 2 is the nucleic acid sequence of the BCG uraA locus (Seq ID No. 1) and the predicted protein products (Seq ID No. 2) . Figure 3 is a schematic representation of integration by homologous recombination in BCG. The uraA locus in wild-type BCG (top) , the transforming DNA (middle) and a BCG transformant in which the transforming DNA fragment has integrated via homologous recombination (bottom) are represented. Figure 4 is a schematic representation of the South¬ ern analysis of the BCG transformant represented in Figure 3. Figure 5 shows the results of Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA isolated from wild-type BCG (WT) and a BCG transformant (6015-9) . The positions of DNA markers are indicated to the right and the apparent size of each of the hybridizing DNA bands is indicated to the left. Detailed Description of the Invention As described herein, Applicants have demonstrated introduction of heterologous DNA into slow-growing myco¬ bacteria (transformation of heterologous DNA into slow- growing mycobacteria) and incorporation of heterologous DNA at a homologous locus in genomic DNA of slow-growing mycobacterial (integration of heterologous DNA into the genomic DNA through homologous recombination) . As a result, they have produced homologously recombinant slow- growing mycobacteria having heterologous DNA integrated at a homologous locus in their genomic DNA. In particular, as described herein, Applicants have introduced hetero¬ logous DNA into J . bovis BCG (BCG) and demonstrated that it is present in the resulting homologously recombinant BCG at a genomic location homologous with sequences pre¬ sent in the DNA construct transformed into the BCG. The DNA construct introduced into BCG by the method described herein included heterologous DNA containing the uraA locus (homologous DNA) and nonhomologous DNA (a selectable marker gene) ; the heterologous homologous DNA flanked the nonhomologous DNA in the construct. Both the heterologous homologous DNA and the heterologous nonhomologous DNA in the DNA construct were shown to have integrated into the genome of the recipient mycobacterial cells at a homo- logous locus (a genomic locus homologous with the DNA including and/or flanked by the homologous DNA in the DNA construct) . As a result of the work described herein, a method of transforming slow growing mycobacteria, a method of intro- ducing heterologous DNA into genomic DNA of a slow growing mycobacterium through integration at a homologous locus, DNA constructs useful in the method of introducing heter¬ ologous DNA into a homologous locus in genomic DNA of a slow growing mycobacteria, homologously recombinant slow growing mycobacteria which contain heterologous DNA at a homologous locus in their genomic DNA, a BCG gene encoding orotidine-5' -monophosphate decarboxylase (BCG OMP DCase) and homologously recombinant slow growing mycobacteria useful as vaccines are available. The following is a description of the present method, DNA constructs and vaccines, as well as the isolated BCG OMP DCase gene and its use. The present invention includes an improved method of transforming slow growing mycobacteria. In the present method, slow growing mycobacteria are subjected to elec¬ troporation in water, preferably after exposure to (cul- turing in the presence of) glycine prior to electro¬ poration and preferably also while they are in mid-log growth. Slow growing mycobacteria to be transformed with heterologous DNA are combined with the heterologous DNA (which can be plasmid/circular DNA or linear DNA) in water. The resulting combination is subjected to electro¬ poration under conditions (e.g., potential, capacitance and time) sufficient for entry of the heterologous DNA into the slow growing mycobacteria. Electroporation is carried out at approximately 2 to 2.5 kV potential and approximately 1 to 125 μF capacitance for approximately 4 to 40 milliseconds. In a specific embodiment, slow grow¬ ing mycobacterial cells are electroporated in water at approximately 2.5 kV potential and approximately 25 μF capacitance for 5-6 milliseconds. In a further embodi¬ ment, slow growing mycobacteria to be transformed are exposed to glycine (e.g., 1 to 2% glycine) by addition of glycine to culture medium prior to harvest of the cells. In a particular embodiment, slow growing mycobacteria are exposed to 1.5% glycine, which is added to culture medium, for approximately 24 hours prior to harvest of the cells for transformation. In another embodiment, slow-growing mycobacteria are in mid-log growth when they are trans- formed. The cells can also have been exposed to glycine, as described above, prior to electroporation, although that is not necessary. The mid-log slow growing mycobac¬ teria are combined with heterologous DNA to be introduced into them and subjected to elecroporation in water, as described above, resulting in transformation of the heter¬ ologous DNA into slow growing mycobacteria in the combina¬ tion. The heterologous DNA introduced into slow growing mycobacteria by the present method is DNA obtained from any source other than the mycobacterium into which it is being introduced. It can be of viral, bacterial, myco¬ bacterial, invertebrate or vertebrate (including human and other mammalian) origin, can be obtained from other orga¬ nisms, such as parasites, or can be produced to have the same nucleic acid sequence as the DNA in its naturally occurring source. Alternatively, it can be modified DNA. The DNA introduced can be plasmid (circular) DNA or linear DNA. The heterologous DNA contains DNA homologous to a locus in genomic DNA of the recipient slow growing myco- bacteria, DNA nonhomologous to a locus in genomic DNA of the recipient cells or both. It is possible to combine slow growing mycobacteria and a DNA construct in which the heterologous DNA is only nonhomologous DNA and carry out the present method of transformation, if the goal is to transform slow growing mycobacteria with greater ef¬ ficiency than is possible with existing methods. Hetero¬ logous DNA introduced in this manner will integrate ran¬ domly into genomic DNA. In order to produce homologously recombinant slow growing mycobacteria through homologous integration be- tween mycobacterial genomic DNA and heterologous DNA, the DNA construct must include sufficient DNA homologous with mycobacterial DNA to cause integration of the construct into a homologous genomic locus. If only homologous DNA is present in the DNA construct used (e.g., in a construct introduced in order to knock out or activate endogenous mycobacterial DNA) , at least 400 bp of homologous DNA will generally be used. If the DNA construct includes homolo¬ gous DNA (for directing or targeting introduction into mycobacterial genomic DNA) and nonhomologous DNA (e.g., DNA encoding a product to be expressed in homologously recombinant slow growing mycobacteria) , there is homolo¬ gous DNA on both sides of (flanking both ends of) the nonhomologous DNA. In general, there will be at least approximately 250 bp of homologous DNA on each side of the nonhomologous DNA, although shorter flanking homologous sequences can be used, provided that they are of suf¬ ficient length to undergo homologous recombination with genomic sequences, resulting in their introduction into mycobacterial genomic DNA (alone or in conjunction with nonhomologous DNA with which the homologous DNA is present in the DNA construct) . In the embodiment described in the examples, 1.5 kb of homologous DNA (1.5 kb of uraA flank¬ ing sequence) has been shown to result in homologous integration, along with nonhomologous DNA, into the uraA locus of M ^ _ bovis BCG. The homologous DNA present in the DNA construct can be any DNA homologous to DNA present in genomic DNA of the recipient slow growing mycobacterium. Specifically de- scribed herein is the isolation and sequencing of the M. bovis BCG OMP DCase gene (uraA) and its use to introduce heterologous nonhomologous DNA into M. bovis BCG genomic DNA at a homologous locus. As described in the examples, a BCG DNA fragment which included the OMP DCase coding sequence was modified to remove the OMP DCase coding sequence and replace it with heterologous nonhomologous DNA encoding a selectable marker gene (i.e., the Kan r (aph) gene) . Specifically, the DNA construct was made by removing the OMP DCase coding sequence from a 4.4 kb BCG DNA fragment containing uraA and replacing it with the Kan r gene (aph) , to produce a DNA fragment in which the selectable marker gene is flanked by 1.5 kb uraA DNA (to direct homologous recombination or integration of the homologous DNA and, along with it, the nonhomologous DNA into mycobacterial genomic DNA) . All or a portion of the OMP DCase gene can be used, with similar modifications, as a component of a DNA construct including other heterolo¬ gous nonhomologous DNA to be introduced into M ^ . bovis BCG genomic DNA at the uraA locus. Alternatively, other V _ bovis BCG genes can be used as the heterologous homologous component of a DNA construct useful for introducing heter¬ ologous nonhomologous DNA into the mycobacterium. Simi¬ larly, DNA from other slow growing mycobacteria (e.g., M. leprae, M. tuberculosis, M. avium, M. africanum) can be incorporated into a DNA construct to be used for homolo¬ gous recombination in the respective slow growing mycobac¬ teria. The heterologous nonhomologous DNA in the DNA con¬ struct introduced into slow growing mycobacteria by the present method can be any DNA which is expressed in the slow-growing mycobacteria or which is not expressed in the recipient mycobacteria but alters mycobacterial protein expression or function. For example, the heterologous nonhomologous DNA can be DNA encoding an antigen(s) of a pathogen or pathogens. A pathogen is any virus, micro¬ organism, other organism or substance (e.g., toxins, toxoids) which causes a disease or undesirable condition. Homologously recombinant slow growing mycobacteria which express a protein antigen(s) from malaria sporozoites, malaria merozoites, diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, Leishmania, Salmonella, M. africanum, M. intracellulare, M. avium, treponema, pertussis, herpes virus, measles virus, mumps, Shigella, Neisseria, Borrelia, rabies, poliovirus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) , Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) , snake venom, insect venom or vibrio cholera can be produced using the method of the present invention. Homologously recombinant M. bovis BCG, which, in a nonhomologously recombinant form, has long been successfully administered as a vaccine in humans can be used. The DNA encoding the protein antigen(s) can be obtained from sources in which it naturally occurs or can be produced through known recombinant techniques or known chemical synthetic methods. For example, the DNA can be produced by genetic engineering methods, such as cloning or by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) . A multipurpose or multifunctional vaccine (one which contains and expresses heterologous DNA encoding antigens from more than one pathogen) can be produced by the pres¬ ent method. In this embodiment, one or more DNA con- structs are used to introduce heterologous homologous DNA and heterologous nonhomologous DNA (DNA encoding an anti¬ gen against which protection is desired) into the slow growing mycobacterium. If one construct is used, it includes DNA encoding the antigens of interest, flanked by homologous DNA sufficient for introduction of the heterol¬ ogous DNA into a homologous locus in the mycobacterium. More than one construct can be used; in this case, each includes homologous DNA and nonhomologous DNA encoding an antigen of interest. A multifunctional vaccine of the present invention can be homologously recombinant BCG which contains, within its genomic DNA, a gene encoding an antigen for M. leprae. a gene encoding an antigen for M. tuberculosis, a gene encoding an antigen for malaria and a gene encoding an antigen for Leish ania; these sequences are flanked by heterologous sequences homologous with BCG DNA and are introduced into the BCG genome by homologous integration. It is not necessary that heterologous nonhomologous DNA be expressed by homologously recombinant slow growing mycobacteria of the present invention or even that there be heterologous nonhomologous DNA present. For example, in one embodiment, heterologous nonhomologous DNA is incorporated into genomic DNA of slow growing mycobacteria for the purpose of inactivating an endogenous myco- bacterial gene, such as a gene necessary for the patho¬ genicity of the mycobacterium. Any gene involved in metabolism necessary for pathogenicity of the slow growing mycobacterium (or for its growth in humans or other ani¬ mals) but whose absence (e.g., from being knocked out) does not prevent it from being cultured can be targeted for inactivation. For example, the aroA gene of M^_ tuber¬ culosis can be inactivated. In another embodiment, heter¬ ologous nonhomologous DNA is introduced in order to acti¬ vate or turn on an endogenous mycobacterial gene. In either case, the heterologous nonhomologous DNA need not be expressed. Inactivation by disruption or deletion of a gene or genes associated with pathogenicity of J tuberculosis can be carried out to produce attenuated M^_ tuberculosis which is useful as a vaccine. There are a number of M ^ tubercu¬ losis genes with interesting functions that can be knocked out (deleted) or disrupted to produce attenuated M ^ tuber¬ culosis. These include katG (Heym, B. et al. , J. Bacte¬ riol.. 175:4255-4259 (1993); Zhang, Y. e_t al. , Nature. 358:591-593 (1992)), the "spare" mycobacterial Hsp60 gene (Hong, T.H. et. al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.. U.S.A.. .90:2608-2612 (1993), aroA (Garbe, T. et al. , J. Bacte¬ riol.. 172:6774-6782 (1990), lysA (Andersen, A.B. et al. , Gene. 124:105-109 (1993), uraA (Aldovini, A. et al., CL. Bacteriol. 175:7282-7289 (1993) and the NL. tuberculosis DNA associated with entry and survival inside cells (Arru- da, S. et al., Science. 261:1454-1457 (1993) . This is not a complete list of candidate genes, but is provided as an example of the types of genes that can be targeted. The katG gene is useful because 1) it is known that JatG can be deleted without creating a lethal mutation and 2) deletion will permit selection for isoniazid resis¬ tance, allowing for a quick selection for recombinants that have undergone homologous recombination at the legit- imate locus. M. tuberculosis expresses two chaperonin-60 homologs (Hong, T.H. et. al- , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A.. 0.:2608-2612 (1993), only one of which appears to be a major target of the immune response (the 65 kDa antigen) , and it is thought that the "65 kDa antigen" may contribute to pathogenesis. Knockout mutations in each of these two genes can be made to investigate whether they are lethal. Heterologous DNA is introduced into NL . tuberculosis by the present method by combining the M_j_ tuberculosis and heter- ologous DNA whose introduction into ^ _ tuberculosis genom¬ ic DNA associated with pathogenesis of the organism, thus resulting in attenuation of the pathogenicity of the recipient JL tuberculosis. The heterologous DNA can be DNA homologous to genomic NL. tuberculosis DNA or DNA homologous to genomic J . tuberculosis DNA and DNA which is not homologous to genomic V _ tuberculosis. Heterologous DNA can be homologous DNA only; it is not necessary that heterologous nonhomologous be present. For example, homologous DNA can be introduced into an endogenous mycobacterial gene (such as one essential for the pathogenicity of a slow growing mycobacterium) in order to disrupt or inactivate that gene. This is partic¬ ularly useful in those embodiments in which an attenuated or disabled mycobacterium is desired, such as for use as a vaccine to elicit an immune response against the myco¬ bacterium itself or as a vehicle to be used in a similar manner to that in which homologously recombinant BCG can be used (to express antigens of other pathogens) . Homologously recombinant slow growing mycobacteria of the present invention can be administered by known methods and a variety of routes (e.g., intradermally, intra¬ muscularly, intravenously) . They are useful as vehicles in which the heterologous nonhomologous DNA is expressed and as modified slow grow mycobacteria (e.g., mycobacteria with reduced or abolished pathogenicity) which are dis¬ abled or attenuated and, thus, useful as vaccines. The present invention will now be illustrated by the following examples, which are not to be considered limited in any way. MATERIALS AND METHODS Strains and plasmids. M. bovis BCG used for DNA isolation and subsequent construction of the recombinant BCG plasmid and λgtll libraries was the Montreal Strain, ATCC #35735. NL_ bovis BCG was grown in Middlebrook 7H9 media, supplemented with 0.05% Tween 80, as described in Aldovini and Young, Nature 351:479-482, (1991) . EL. coli strain Y1107 (pyrF: :Mu trpam lacZam hsdR- m+ su-) was obtained from D. Botstein. Plasmids were propagated in the EL. coli strain DH5α! from Bethesda Research Laborato- ries. EL. coli cultures used for plasmid selection were grown in Luria Bertani broth or agar with 50 μg/ml ampi- cillin. Phage M13 used for the production of single stranded DNA were propagated in EL. coli strain JMlOl from New England BioLabs. JMlOl was grown in YT medium (Mania- tis) . Genomic libraries were generated using pUC19 from Bethesda Research Laboratories. Plasmid pY6002 (Husson et al. , J. Bacteriol. , 172:519-524 1990) was the source of the 1.3 kb BamHI DNA fragment containing the amino- glycoside phosphotransferase gene aph. Enzymes. Klenow fragment of EL . coli DNA polymerase was supplied by Promega. T7 polymerase, and Taq polymer¬ ase (Sequenase and Taquence) were provided by United States Biochemical. Recombinant DNA library construction. To isolate BCG DNA, cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed, and resuspended in 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 10 mM EDTA, 10% su¬ crose, and 0.5 mg/ml lysozyme, and incubated at 37 degrees for one hour. EDTA was then added to 1%, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. Three phenol/chloroform extractions were performed, followed by RNase treatment, phenol/chloroform extraction, chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The DNA was then resuspended in TE buffer, (10 mM Tris pH 7.5, imM EDTA) . To construct the plasmid library, the DNA was sub¬ jected to partial digestion with Sau3A and DNA fragments of 2-6 kb were isolated by agarose gel electrophoresis onto DE81 paper and eluted in buffer containing 10 mM Tris, HC1, 1M NaCl and 1 mM EDTA. The DNA fragments were then phenol-chloroform extracted, ethanol precipitated and ligated into BamHl digested, calf-intestinal phosphatase treated pUC19 plasmid vector. EL. coli cells were trans¬ formed with the ligated mixture, and approximately 4 X 10 s recombinants were obtained. Plasmid DNA was obtained from the pool of transformed colonies using an alkaline lysis method. The λgtll library was constructed using a procedure described by Young. (Young, R.A. , et al . . , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.. USA. £2:2583-2587 (1985)) . Briefly, BCG genomic DNA was subjected to random partial digestion with DNase I, EcoRI linkers were added to the digestion prod¬ ucts, and DNA fragments of 4-8 kb were isolated by agarose gel electrophoresis and electroelution. The DNA fragments were then ethanol precipitated and ligated into EcoRI- digested λgtll arms. The ligation mixture was packaged into λ heads and the packaging mixture was used to infect E. coli. Approximately 5 X 10 6 recombinants were ob¬ tained. EXAMPLE 1. Isolation of BCG OMP DCase gene by complementation and plasmid DNA manipulation. The BCG recombinant library was used to transform the EL . coli strain Y1107. Twenty-one transformants capable of growing in the absence of uracil were isolated, of which six were chosen for further evalu- ation by restriction analysis. Plasmid DNA was isolated by alkaline lysis from cells grown in liquid culture, and restriction analysis indicated that all of these plasmids contained the same or very similar insert DNAs. One of these clones (pY6006) was used for further study (see Figure 1) . A 0.6 kb BamHI DNA fragment from pY6006 was used to screen the λgtll library, leading to the isolation of phage Y3030. This phage carries a 5.6 kb EcoRI BCG DNA insert containing the OMP DCase gene. This insert DNA was subcloned into pGEMz(f+) to generate pY6011. The 4.4 kb SacI-EcoRI fragment of the Y3030 insert was subcloned into pUC19 to generate pY6014. Plasmid pY6015 was derived from pY6014 by replacing uraA sequences with the aph gene; a 1.15 kb Hindi DNA fragment containing uraA sequences was removed by partial Hindi digestion of pY6014 DNA, and it was replaced with a 1.3 kb BamHI fragment containing aph from pY6002 that was blunt-ended with Klenow. DNA Sequence analysis. The M. bovis BCG uraA gene was sequenced from the 4.4 kb SacI-EcoRI fragment of the λgtll phage Y3030 cloned into M13 in both orientations. The same DNA fragment was subcloned into pUC19 to generate pY6014 for further manipulation. Single strand DNA for sequence analysis was prepared from M13 grown in JMlOl (Viera and Messing, Methods Enzvmol. , 153:3-11 1987) . Both DNA strands were sequenced using the dideoxy-method of Sanger (Sanger et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 24:5463-5467, .1977) . Mycobacterial DNA has a high GC content, and two different strategies were used to reduce band compression and other artifacts due to high G+C content. A subset of the reactions was carried out using Taq polymerase at high temperature (70°C) . In addition, dGTP and dITP were used in independent sequence reactions (Kimsey and Kaiser, J. Biol. Chem. 267:819-824, 1992) . RESULTS Isolation of the BCG OMP decarboxylase gene by genetic complementation. The complementation strategy employed to isolate the BCG OMP DCase gene was similar to that em¬ ployed previously to isolate the homologous gene in M. smegmatis (Husson et al . , J. Bacteriol. 172 :519-524. 1990) . A recombinant library was constructed in the E. coli vector pUC19 using size selected BCG genomic DNA fragments from a partial SauIIIA digest. An E. coli pyrF mutant strain (Y1107) was transformed with this library and cells were plated on medium lacking uracil to select for uracil prototrophs, and on rich medium containing ampicillin to ascertain the transformation frequency and to estimate the fraction of transformants that were able to complement the E. coli pyrF defect. Approximately 0.05% of the cells transformed with the recombinant li¬ brary became uracil prototrophs. DNA clones were obtained from six colonies able to grow in the absence of uracil, and restriction analysis revealed that these clones con¬ tained the same insert DNA. One of these clones, pY6006, was subjected to further study (Figure 1) . To identify, the portion of the 3.5 kb insert DNA pY6006 that was responsible for complementation, the 1.3-kb BamHI fragment of Tn903, which encodes amino- glycoside transferase (aph) , was inserted into several different sites in pY6006 insert DNA, the resultant plasm¬ ids were reintroduced into the E. coli pyrF mutant strain, and the ability of the new plasmids to complement the mutant phenotype was assessed as before (Figure 1) . One of the three plasmids with insertion mutations, pY6006B, lost the ability to complement the pyrF mutant phenotype, suggesting that sequences necessary for the complementing activity are located in the vicinity of the BamHI site that is disrupted in pY6006B. Analysis of DNA sequences for the left end of pY6006 insert DNA (as diagrammed in Figure 1) revealed that the open reading frame of the pUC19 lacZ gene in this plasmid continues uninterrupted into an open reading frame for a polypeptide similar in sequence to OMP decarboxylase proteins. This preliminary data suggested that the left end of pY6006 insert DNA encoded the amino-terminus of the BCG OMP decarboxylase protein. For later experiments, it was important to have both the OMP decarboxylase gene and a substantial amount of flanking sequences. To obtain genomic DNA that contains both the OMP decarboxylase gene and its flanking se¬ quences, the 0.6 kb BamHI DNA fragment from pY6006 was used to probe a λgtll library, of M. bovis BCG DNA, as the λgtll library contains insert DNA fragments whose size, on average, is larger (4-8 kb) than the plasmid library used to obtain pY6006. A lambda clone (Y3030) was isolated which contains a 5.6 kb EcoRI DNA insert that overlaps that of pY6006. The 5.6 kb EcoRI DNA fragment, and a 4.4 kb Sad-EcoRI subfragment, were subcloned into plasmid vectors to generate pY6011 and pY6014, respectively (Fig¬ ure 1) . Both pY6011 and pY6014 were able to complement the defect of the E. coli pyrF mutant strain Y1107. Sequence of the BCG OMP decarboxylase gene and flank¬ ing DNA. DNA fragments, from phage Y3030 insert DNA were subcloned into M13 vectors and subjected to sequence analysis. Sequences were determined for both DNA strands, and most of the sequence reactions were duplicated with ITP replacing GTP to minimize artifacts due to the GC-rich nature of mycobacterial DNA. Figure 2 shows the sequences obtained for the BCG OMP decarboxylase gene (uraA) (nucle- otides 1691-2512) and for flanking DNA. The predicted BCG OMP decarboxylase protein sequence is 274 amino acids long, similar in size to other OMP decarboxylase proteins. The 274 amino acids of the predicted BCG OMP decarboxylase protein are bracketed in Figure 2. When the BCG decarbox- ylase protein sequence was used to screen the available databases for similar sequences, the results revealed that the BCG protein is closely related to the Mvxococcus xanthus OMP DCase (Kirnsey and Kaiser, J. Biol. Chem. 267:819-824, 1992) and more distantly related to the other known prokaryotic and eukaryotic OMP DCases. Comparison of the BCG and Jl xanthus OMP decarboxylases reveals that 40% of the amino acid residues are identical. In con¬ trast, only 17% of the residues of the BCG and E. coli proteins and 22% of the amino acids of the M. xanthus and E. coli proteins are identical, although there are a substantial number of conservative amino acid substitu¬ tions among these proteins. The relationship of M. xanth¬ us OMP decarboxylase to homologues in other prokaryotes and in eukaryotes was recently described in some detail (Kirnsey and Kaiser, J. Biol. Chem. 267:819-824, 1992) . This comparative sequence analysis revealed that there are four regions which are more highly conserved, and the predicted BCG OMP decarboxylase also shares this feature with the other homologues. It is interesting to note that Mycobacteria and Mvxococci both have GC-rich genomes, but this alone does not account £or the degree of sequence conservation between the OMP decarboxylases from these two proaryotes; rather, the two genuses appear to be more closely related to one another than either is to the other prokaryotes for which OMP decarboxylase sequence are available. Further analysis of the BCG genomic DNA sequences revealed that the 1.7 kb sequence upstream of OMP decar- boxylase coding sequences contains a single large open reading frame. This open reading frame has no apparent beginning in the cloned DNA fragment, suggesting that it is the coding sequence for the carboxy-terminus of a larger protein. A screen of the sequence database re- vealed that the 497 amino acid residues of the predicted protein are highly homologous to the carboxyl termini of the large subunit of carbarnoyl phosphate synthase. For example, the 497 amino acid carboxy terminus of the puta¬ tive M. bovis BCG protein was 46% identical to the compa- rable segment of the E. coli carbarnoyl phosphate synthase subunit, which is encoded by the carB gene (Nyunoya and Lusty, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 8JD =4629-4633, 1983) . Thus, the BCG carB gene appears to be located just up¬ stream of uraA. This is interesting because both carbamo- yl phosphate synthase and OMP decarboxylase are involved in pyrimidine biosynthesis. Carbarnoyl phosphate synthase catalyzes the first reaction in pyrimidine biosynthesis, the production of carbarnoyl phosphate, while OMP decarbox¬ ylase catalyzes the last step in the biosynthesis of UMP. Analysis of BCG DNA sequences downstream of the uraA gene revealed a -single large " open reading frame that continues through the right end of the sequenced DNA fragment. This open reading frame predicts a protein of 501 amino acids. A search of the computer database re- vealed that the protein predicted by this ORF is similar to previously described proteins from M^ tuberculosis and M. leprae. The predicted BCG protein is similar to a putative M. tuberculosis antigen encoded downstream of the gene for the 65 kDa antigen (Shinnick, T.M., J. Bac- teriol. 169:1080-1088, 1987) and to a NL. leprae antigen that may be an integral membrane protein (Vega-Lopez et al., Infect. Immun. 61:2145-2154, 1993) . Southern analysis with whole genomic DNA revealed that there is a single copy of the uraA gene and flanking DNA in the BCG genome (see below) . The relative positions of the BCG uraA gene and the portions of other genes identified through sequence analysis are summarized graph¬ ically in Figure 1. The position of OMP decarboxylase sequences is consistent with the genetic analysis de- scribed above. The aph insertion mutations in plasmid pY6006 that adversely affected complementation of the E. coli OMP decarboxylase mutant occurred within OMP decar¬ boxylase coding sequences. Conversely, the aph insertion mutations that did not affect complementation of the E. coli OMP decarboxylase mutant occurred outside of the BCG OMP decarboxylase coding sequences. EXAMPLE 2 BCG transformation. BCG Pasteur (ATCC) was grown in log phase to an OD 600 of 0.5 in Middlebrook medium. BCG cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed twice with PBS (phosphate bufered saline) and resuspended in ImM MgCl (pH 7.2) , 10% sucrose, 15% glycerol at a concentration of 10 OD 600 per ml. 0.4 ml of BCG cells was mixed with 2 ug of plasmid DNA and electroporated in a 0.2 cm cuvette. Electroporation settings were 2.5 kV potential and 25 μF capacitance. After electroporation, cells were resus¬ pended in 10 ml Middlebrook medium and incubated at 37C for 2 hours before plating on Middlebrook agar containing 20 ug/ml kanamycin and, in some experiments, with uracil. Southern blot analysis. Genomic DNAs from BCG strains were isolated as described above, digested with restiction enzymes, subjected to agarose gel electrophore¬ sis in the presense of ethidium bromide, transfered to nitrocellulose, and probed with DNA labelled with 32P by random priming, all by standard procedure (Ausubel et. aJL. , Current protocol in molecular biology (1987) . Green Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience) . Introduction of foreign DNA into the BCG genome. Previous attempts to obtain homologous recombination in M. bovis BCG have apparently not been successful (Kalpana et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:5433-5447. 1991; Young and Cole, J. Bacteriol. 175:1-6, 1993) . It is possible that the efficiency of transformation has an influence on the ability to obtain homologous recombination. To maxi¬ mize the transformation efficiency of BCG, we investigated the effect of adding glycine to the culture medium prior to harvesting cells for electroporation, as the presence of 1.5% glycine can affect the integrity of the cell wall and it seems to improve transformation effeciency in M. smegmatis (Mizuguchi and Takunaga, "Spheroplasts of Myco¬ bacteria. 2. Infection of Phage and Its DNA on Glycine Treated Mycobacteria and Spheroplasts", Med. Biol. , 77:57 1968) . In addition, we compared the efficiency of elec¬ troporation of BCG cells in water relative to buffer. The autonomously replicating plasmid pYUB12 (Snapper et a . , Mol . Microbiol . 4_:1911-1919, 1988) was used to determine how these variables affected the relative efficiencies of transformation. The results are summarized in the Table under Experiment 1. Transformation efficiencies were improved substantially by exposing cultures to 1.5% gly¬ cine for 24 hours prior to harvest, and by performing the electroporation in water rather than in buffer. TABLE. BCG Transformation Efficiencies Trans- Glycine Electro¬ Transformants, /uσ DNA forming DNA a Treatment 13 poration Medium 0 Expt 1 Expt 2 Expt 3 pYUB12 - Buffer 50 - - pYUB12 + Buffer 250 -' - pYUB12 - Water 500 - - pYUB12 + Water 10 4 10 4 10 5 None + Water 8 6 35 p6015(I) - Buffer - 4 - p6015(I) + Buffer - 22 - p6015(I) - Water - 39 - p6015(I) + Water - 98 500 a The intact autonomously replicating plasmid pYUB12 was used as a control and the linear insert DNA of plasmid pY6015 [pY6015(I)] was used as integrating DNA. b Glycine was added to 1.5% to BCG cultures 24 hours prior to transformation. °The buffer is ImM MgCl (pH 7.2) , 10% sucrose, 15% glycerol. Experiments with linearized DNA molecules in yeast indicate that the ends of linear DNA molecules are recomb- inogenic; these ends may facilitate homologous integration by invading genomic DNA at homologous sites to initiate recombination (Rothstein, R., Meth. , Enzymol . 194:281-301 (1988)) . The sequenced 4.4 kb BCG DNA fragment containing C7raA was used to investigate whether cloned DNA sequences could integrate at the homologous locus in M^_ bovis BCG. To mark the DNA fragment, the OMP decarboxylase coding sequence was replaced with a kanomycin-resistance gene (aph) to create pY6015 (Figure 3) . This left intact approximately 1.5 kb of UraA flanking sequences that could be used to direct homologous integration. The transforma¬ tion experiment described above for plasmid pYUB12 was repeated with pY6015 insert DNA, and the results are summarized in the Table under Experiment 2. Again, trans¬ formation efficiencies were improved substantially by exposing cultures to 1.5% glycine £or 24 hours prior to harvest, and by performing the electroporation in water rather than in buffer. However, because the transforma¬ tion efficiencies obtained with the linear DNA were low, we made one additional attempt to improve these efficien¬ cies. Cultures of M. bovis BCG and other slow growing mycobacteria contain large numbers of cells that are inviable or that have an exceedingly long lag time after plating. Some investigators have suggested that mycobac¬ terial cells have an unusual ability to enter and maintain a dormant state, even when nutrients are available (Young and Cole, "Leprosy, Tuberculosis, and the New Genetics", J. Bacteriol. , 175:1-6 1993) . We reasoned that mainte¬ nance of BCG cultures in mid-log growth might maximize the fraction of cells that were undergoing DNA synthesis and were competent to take up DNA and to incorporate it into homologous sites in the genome. A third experiment was performed, in which BCG cultures were diluted approximate¬ ly 1:4 every two days over a two-month period to ensure persistent log-phase growth before transformation. The results in the Table indicate that this approach produces a significant increase in the number of transformants ob¬ tained with either the autonomously replicating vector or the linear DNA fragment. Ten of the BCG colonies obtained in the third experi¬ ment were selected for further study after growing to adequate size for picking (24 days after plating) . The ten transformants were colony purified, and DNA was prepared from each. DNA preparations from the wild type strain and the ten transformants were digested with a variety of restriction endonucleases and Southern analysis revealed that the kanomycin-resistant BCG transformants all con¬ tained vector DNA integrated into the genome. In two of the ten transformants, the transforming DNA had integrated at the homologous locus. Figure 5 shows representative results from Southern analysis of the wild type strain and one of the BCG recombinants in which the cloned DNA inte¬ grated at the homologous locus. Equivalents Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using not more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the inven¬ tion described herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the following claims. SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INFORMATION: (i) APPLICANT: (A) NAME: Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (B) STREET: Nine Cambridge Center (C) CITY: Cambridge (D) STATE/PROVINCE: Massachusetts (E) COUNTRY: USA (F) POSTAL CODE/ZIP: 02142 (G) TELEPHONE: (I) TELEFAX: (ii) TITLE OF INVENTION: Homologously Recombinant Slow Growing Mycobacteria and Uses Therefor (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 2 (iv) CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: (A) ADDRESSEE: Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds, P.C. (B) STREET: Two Militia Drive (C) CITY: Lexington (D) STATE: MA (E) COUNTRY: USA (F) ZIP: 02173 (v) COMPUTER READABLE FORM: (A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk (B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS (D) SOFTWARE: Patentin Release #1.0, Version #1.25 (vi) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: (B) FILING DATE: (C) CLASSIFICATION: (vii) PRIOR APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: 08/095,734 (B) FILING DATE: 22-JUL-1993 (viii) ATTORNEY/AGENT INFORMATION: (A) NAME: Granahan, Patricia (B) REGISTRATION NUMBER: 32,227 (C) REFERENCE/DOCKET NUMBER: WHI93-11MA PCT (ix) TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION: (A) TELEPHONE: 617-861-6240 (B) TELEFAX: 617-861-9540 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:l: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 4394 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:l: GAGCTCGACC CCGCCGCCGA AACAGAGGTG GCCCCGCAGA CCGAAAGGCC CAAGGTGCTG 60 ATCCTCGGTT CGGGGCCCAA TCGGATCGGC CAGGGTATCG AGTTCGACTA CAGCTGCGTA 120 CACGCGGCAA CCACGTTGAG CCAGGCTGGC TTTGAGACCG TGATGGTCAA CTGCAACCCG 180 GAGACCATGG TGTCCACCGA CTTCGACACC GCGGACAGGT TGTACTTCGA GCCGTTGACG 240 TTCGAGGACG TCTTGGAGGT CTACCACGCC GAAATGGAAT CCGGTAGCGG TGGCCCGGGA 300 GTGGCCGGCG TCATCGTGCA GCTCGGCGGC CAGACCCCGC TCGGCTGGCG CACCGGCTCG 360 CCGACGCCGG GTCCCGCTCG TGGGCACCCA CCGGAGGCCA TCGACCTGGC CGAGGATGCG 420 GCCGTTCGGC GACCTGCTGA.GCGAGGACTG CCGGCGCCAA AGTACGGCAC CGCAACCACT 480 TTCGCCCAGG CCCGCCGGAT CGCCGAGGAG ATCGGCTATC CGGTGCTGGT GCGGCCGTCG 540 TATGTGCTCG GTGGTCGCGG CATGGAGATC GTGTATGACG AAGAAACGTT GCAGGGCTAC 600 ATCACCCGCG CCACTCAGCT ATCCCCCGAA CACCCGGTGC TCGTGCACCG CTTCCTCGAG 660 GACGCGGTCG AGATCGACGT CGACGCTCTG TGTGATGGCG CCGAGGTCTA TATCGGCGGA 720 ATCATGGAGC ACATCGAGGA GGCCGGCATC CACTCCGGTG ACTCGGCCTG TGCGCTGCCA 780 CCGGTCACGT TGGGCCGCAG CGACATCGAG AAGGTGCGTA AGGCCACTGA AGCCATTGCG 840 CATGGCATCG GCGTGGTGGG GCTGCTCAAC GTGCAGTCCG CGCTCAAGGA TGACGTGCTC 900 TACGTCCTGG AAGCCAACCC GAGAGCGAGC CGTACCGTTC CGTTTGTATC CAAGGCCACA 960 GCGGTGCCAC TCGCCAAGGC ATGCGCCCGG ATCATGTTGG GCGCCACCAT TGCCCAGCTG 1020 CGCGCCGAAG GCTTGCTGGC GGTCACCGGG GATGGCGCCC ACGCGGCGCG AAACGCCCCC 1080 ATCGCGGTCA ACCAGGCCGT GTTGCCGTTT CACCGGTTCC GGCGCGCCGA CGGGGCCGCC 1140 ATCGACTCGC TACTCGGCCC GGAGATGAAA TCGACCGGCG AGGTGATGGG CATCGACCGC 1200 GACTTCGGCA GCCGGTTCGC CAAGAGCCAG ACCGCCGCCT ACGGGTCGCT GCCGGCCCAG 1260 GGCACAGTGT TCGTGTCGGT GGCCAACCGG GACAAGCGGT CGCTGGTGTT TCCGGTCAAA 1320 CCGATTGGCC CACCTGGGTT TTCGCGTCCT TGCCACCGAA GCACCGCAGA GATCTTGCGC 1380 CGCAACGGTA TTCCCTGCGA CGACGTCCGC AAACATTTCG AGCCGGCGCA GCCCGGCCGC 1440 CCCACAATGT CGGCGGTGGA CGCGATCCGA GCCGGCGAGG TCAACATGGT GATCAACACT 1500 CCCTATGGCA ACTCCGGTCC GCGCATCGAC GGCTATGAGA TCCGTTCGGC GGCGGTGGCC 1560 GGCAACATCC CGTGCATCAC CACGGTGCAG GGCGCATCCG CCGCCGTGCA GGGGATAGAG 1620 GCCGGGATCC GCGGCGACAT CGGGGTGCGC TCCCTGCAGG AGCTGCACCG GGTGATCGGG 1680 GGCGTCGAGC GGTGACCGGG TTCGGTCTCC GGTTGGCCGA GGCAAAGGCA CGCCGCGGCC 1740 CGTTGTGTCT GGGCATCGAT CCGCATCCCG AGCTGCTGCG GGGCTGGGAT CTGGCGACCA 1800 CGGCCGACGG GCTGGCCGCG TTCTGCGACA TCTGCGTACG GGCCTTCGCT GATTTCGCGG 1860 TGGTCAAACC GCAGGTGGCG TTTTTTGAGT CATACGGGGC TGCCGGATTC GCGGTGCTGG 1920 AGCGCACCAT CGCGGAACTG CGGGCCGCAG ACGTGCTGGT GTTGGCCGAC GCCAAGCGCG 1980 GCGACATTGG GGCGACCATG TCGGCGTATG CGACGGCCTG GGTGGGCGAC TCGCCGCTGG 2040 CCGCCGACGC CGTGACGGCC TCGCCCTATT TGGGCTTCGG TTCGCTGCGG CCGCTGCTAG 2100 AGGTCGCGGC CGCCCACGGC CGAGGGGTGT TCGTGCTGGC GGCCACCTCC AATCCCGAGG 2160 GTGCGGCGGT GCAGAATGCC GCCGCCGACG GCCGCAGCGT GGCCCAGTTG GTCGTGGACC 2220 AGGTGGGGGC GGCCAACGAG. GCGGCAGGAC CCGGGCCCGG ATCCATCGGC GTGGTCGTCG 2280 GCGCAACGGC GCCACAGGCC CCCGATCTCA GCGCCTTCAC CGGGCCGGTG CTGGTGCCCG 2340 GCGTGGGGGT GCAGGGCGGG CGCCCGGAGG CGCTGGGCGG TCTGGGCGGG GCCGCATCGA 2400 GCCAGCTGTT GCCCGCGGTG GCGCGCGAGG TCTTGCGGGC CGGCCCCGGC GTGCCCGAAT 2460 TGCGCGCCGC GGGCGAACGG ATGCGCGATG CCGTCGCCTA TCTCGCTGCC GTGTAGCGGG 2520 TGCCCTGCCA CCGCGCCGCT AAATCCCACC AGCATGGGGT GGTGAGCCCA GCGCTCGTGT 2580 GACCAAACTC ACCGCCCTGG GCCGTCGTCA CGCTGTGTTA ACCTCTCGTT CAAATGATAT 2640 TCATATTCAA TAGTGGCGCT AAGTGTCCGG TTGAATCCCC GTTGAACCCC CAACAGATGG 2700 AGTCTGTGTC GTGACGTTGC GAGTCGTTCC CGAAAGCCTG GCAGGCGCCA GCGCTGCCAT 2760 CGAAGCAGTG ACCGCTCGCC TGGCCGCCGC GCACGCCGCG GCGGCCCCGT TTATCGCGGC 28 0 GGTCATCCCG CCTGGGTCCG ACTCGGTTTC GGTGTGCAAC GCCGTTGAGT TCAGCGTTCA 2880 CGGTAGTCAG CATGTGGCAA TGGCCGCTCA GGGGGTTGAG GAGCTCGGCC GCTCGGGGGT 2940 CGGGGTGGCC GAATCGGGTG CCAGTTATGC CGCTAGGATG CGCTGGCGGC GGCGTCGTAT 3000 CTCAGCGGTG GGCTATGACC GAGCCGTGGA TAGCCTTCCC TCCCGAGGTG CACTCGGCGA 3060 TGCTGAACTA CGGTGCGGGC GTTGGGCCGA TGTTGATCTC CGCCACGCAG AATGGGGAGC 3120 TCAGCGCCCA ATACGCAGAA GCGGCATCCG AGGTCGAGGA ATTGTTGGGG GTGGTGGCCT 3180 CCGAGGGATG GCAGGGGCAA GCCGCCGAGG CGTTAGTCGC CGCGTACATG CCGTTTCTGG 3240 CGTGGCTGAT CCAAGCCAGC GCCGACTGCG TGGAAATGGC CGCCCAGCAA CACGCCGTCA 3300 TCGAGGCCTA CACTGCCGCG GTAGAGCTGA TGCCTACTCA GGTCGAACTG GCCGCCAACC 3360 AAATCAAGCT CGCGGTGTTG GTAGCGACCA ATTTCTTTGG CATCAACACC ATTCCCATTG 3420 CGATCAATGA GGCCGAGTAC GTGGAGATGT GGGTTCGGGC CGCCACCACG ATGGCGACCT 3480 ATTCAACAGT CTCCAGATCG GCGCTCTCCG CGATGCCGCA CACCAGCCCC CCGCCGCTGA 3540 TCCTGAAATC CGATGAACTG CTCCCCGACA CCGGGGAGGA CTCCGATGAA GACGGCCACA 3600 ACCATGGCGG TCACAGTCAT GGCGGTCACG CCAGGATGAT CGATAACTTC TTTGCCGAAA 3660 TCCTGCGTGG CGTCAGCGCG GGCCGCATTG TTTGGGACCC CGTCAACGGC ACCCTCAACG 3720 GACTCGACTA CGACGATTAC GTCTACCCCG GTCACGCGAT CTGGTGGCTG GCTCGAGGCC 3780 TCGAGTTTTT TCAGGATGGT GAACAATTTG GCGAACTGTT GTTCACCAAT CCGACTGGGG 3840 CTTTTCAGTT CCTCCTCTAC GTCGTTGTGG TGGATTTGCC GACGCACATA GCCCAGATCG 3900 CTACCTGGCT GGGCCAGTAC CCGCAGTTGC TGTCGGCTGC CCTCACTGGC GTCATCGCCC 3960 ACCTGGGAGC AATAACTGGT TTGGCGGGCC TATCCGGCCT GAGCGCCATT CCGTCTGCTG 4020 CGATACCCGC CGTTGTACCG GAGCTGACAC CCGTCGCGGC CGCGCCGCCT ATGTTGGCGG 4080 TCGCCGGGGT GGGCCCTGCA GTCGCCGCGC CGGGCATGCT CCCCGCCTCA GCACCCGCAC 4140 CGGCGGCAGC GGCCGGCGCC ACCGCAGCCG GCCCGACGCC GCCGGCGACT GGTTTCGGAG 4200 GGCTTCCCGC CCTACCTGGT CGGCGGTGGC GGCCCAGGAA TAGGGTTCGG CTCGGGACAG 4260 TCGGCCCACG CCAAGGCCGC GGCGTCCGAT TCCGCTGCAG CCGAGTCGGC GGCCCAGGCC 4320 TCGGCGCGTG CGCAGGCGCG TGCTGCACGG CGGGGCCGCT CGGCGGCAAG GCACGTGGCC 4380 ATCGTGACGA ATTC 4394 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 1271 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2: Glu Leu Asp Pro Ala Ala Glu Thr Glu Val Ala Pro Gin Thr Glu Arg 1 5 10 15 Pro Lys Val Leu lie Leu Gly Ser Gly Pro Asn Arg lie Gly Gin Gly 20 25 30 lie Glu Phe Asp Tyr Ser Cys Val His Ala Ala Thr Thr Leu Ser Gin 35 40 45 Ala Gly Phe Glu Thr Val Met Val Asn Cys Asn Pro Glu Thr Met Val 50 55 60 Ser Thr Asp Phe Asp Thr Ala Asp Arg Leu Tyr Phe Glu Pro Leu Thr 65 70 75 80 Phe Glu Asp Val Leu Glu Val Tyr His Ala Glu Met Glu Ser Gly Ser 85 90 95 Gly Gly Pro Gly Val Ala Gly Val He Val Gin Leu Gly Gly Gin Thr 100 105 110 Pro Leu Gly Trp Arg Thr Gly Ser Pro Thr Pro Gly Pro Ala Arg Gly 115 120 125 His Pro Pro Glu Ala He Asp Leu Ala Glu Asp Ala Ala Val Arg Arg 130 135 140 Pro Ala Glu Arg Gly Leu Pro Ala Pro Lys Tyr Gly Thr Ala Thr Thr 145 150 155 160 Phe Ala Gin Ala Arg Arg He Ala Glu Glu He Gly Tyr Pro Val Leu 165 170 175 Val Arg Pro Ser Tyr Val Leu Gly Gly Arg Gly Met Glu He Val Tyr 180 185 190 Asp Glu Glu Thr Leu Gin Gly Tyr He Thr Arg Ala Thr Gin Leu Ser 195 200 205 Pro Glu His Pro Val Leu Val His Arg Phe Leu Glu Asp Ala Val Glu 210 215 220 He Asp Val Asp Ala Leu Cys Asp Gly Ala Glu Val Tyr He Gly Gly 225 230 235 240 He Met Glu His He Glu Glu Ala Gly He His Ser Gly Asp Ser Ala 245 250 255 Cys Ala Leu Pro Pro Val Thr Leu Gly Arg Ser Asp He Glu Lys Val 260 265 270 Arg Lys Ala Thr Glu Ala He Ala His Gly He Gly Val Val Gly Leu 275 280 285 Leu Asn Val Gin Ser Ala Leu Lys Asp Asp Val Leu Tyr Val Leu Glu 290 295 300 Ala Asn Pro Arg Ala Ser Arg Thr Val Pro Phe Val Ser Lys Ala Thr 305 310 315 320 Ala Val Pro Leu Ala Lys Ala Cys Ala Arg He Met Leu Gly Ala Thr 325 330 335 He Ala Gin Leu Arg Ala Glu Gly Leu Leu Ala Val Thr Gly Asp Gly 340 345 350 Ala His Ala Ala Arg Asn Ala Pro He Ala Val Asn Gin Ala Val Leu 355 360 365 Pro Phe His Arg Phe Arg Arg Ala Asp Gly Ala Ala He Asp Ser Leu 370 375 380 Leu Gly Pro Glu Met Lys Ser Thr Gly Glu Val Met Gly He Asp Arg 385 390 395 400 Asp Phe Gly Ser Arg Phe Ala Lys Ser Gin Thr Ala Ala Tyr Gly Ser 405 410 415 Leu Pro Ala Gin Gly Thr Val Phe Val Ser Val Ala Asn Arg Asp Lys 420 425 430 Arg Ser Leu Val Phe Pro Val Lys Arg Leu Ala His Leu Gly Phe Arg 435 440 445 Val Leu Ala Thr Glu Ala Pro Gin Arg Ser Cys Ala Ala Thr Val Phe 450 455 460 Pro Ala Thr Thr Ser Ala Asn He Ser Ser Arg Arg Ser Pro Ala Ala 465 470 475 480 Pro Gin Cys Arg Arg Trp Thr Arg Ser Glu Pro Ala Arg Ser Thr Trp 485 490 495 Met Thr Gly Phe Gly Leu Arg Leu Ala Glu Ala Lys Ala Arg Arg Gly 500 505 510 Pro Leu Cys Leu Gly He Asp Pro His Pro Glu Leu Leu Arg Gly Trp 515 520 525 Asp Leu Ala Thr Thr Ala Asp Gly Leu Ala Ala Phe Cys Asp He Cys 530 535 540 Val Arg Ala Phe Ala Asp Phe Ala Val Val Lys Pro Gin Val Ala Phe 545 550 555 560 Phe Glu Ser Tyr Gly Ala Ala Gly Phe Ala Val Leu Glu Arg Thr He 565 570 575 Ala Glu Leu Arg Ala Ala Asp Val Leu Val Leu Ala Asp Ala Lys Arg 580 585 590 Gly Asp He Gly Ala Thr Met Ser Ala Tyr Ala Thr Ala Trp Val Gly 595 600 605 Asp Ser Pro Leu Ala Ala Asp Ala Val Thr Ala Ser Pro Tyr Leu Gly 610 615 620 Phe Gly Ser Leu Arg Pro Leu Leu Glu Val Ala Ala Ala His Gly Arg 625 630 635 640 Gly Val Phe Val Leu Ala Ala Thr Ser Asn Pro Glu Gly Ala Ala Val 645 650 655 Gin Asn Ala Ala Ala Asp Gly Arg Ser Val Ala Gin Leu Val Val Asp 660 665 670 Gin Val Gly Ala Ala Asn Glu Ala Ala Gly Pro Gly Pro Gly Ser He 675 680 685 Gly Val Val Val Gly Ala Thr Ala Pro Gin Ala Pro Asp Leu Ser Ala 690 695 700 Phe Thr Gly Pro Val Leu Val Pro Gly Val Gly Val Gin Gly Gly Arg 705 710 715 720 Pro Glu Ala Leu Gly Gly Leu Gly Gly Ala Ala Ser Ser Gin Leu Leu 725 730 735 Pro Ala Val Ala Arg Glu Val Leu Arg Ala Gly Pro Gly Val Pro Glu 740 745 750 Leu Arg Ala Ala Gly Glu Arg Met Arg Asp Ala Val Ala Tyr Leu Ala 755 760 765 Ala Val Met Trp Gin Trp Pro Leu Arg Gly Leu Arg Ser Ser Ala Ala 770 775 780 Arg Gly Ser Gly Trp Pro Asn Arg Val Pro Val Met Pro Leu Gly Cys 785 790 795 800 Ala Gly Gly Gly Val Val Ser Gin Arg Trp Ala Met Thr Glu Pro Trp 805 810 815 He Ala Phe Pro Pro Glu Val His Ser Ala Met Leu Asn Tyr Gly Ala 820 825 830 Gly Val Gly Pro Met Leu He Ser Ala Thr Gin Asn Gly Glu Leu Ser 835 840 845 Ala Gin Tyr Ala Glu Ala Ala Ser Glu Val Glu Glu Leu Leu Gly Val 850 855 860 Val Ala Ser Glu Gly Trp Gin Gly Gin Ala Ala Glu Ala Leu Val Ala 865 870 875 880 Ala Tyr Met Pro Phe Leu Ala Trp Leu He Gin Ala Ser Ala Asp Cys 885 890 895 Val Glu Met Ala Ala Gin Gin His Ala Val He Glu Ala Tyr Thr Ala 900 905 910 Ala Val Glu Leu Met Pro Thr Gin Val Glu Leu Ala Ala Asn Gin He 915 920 925 Lys Leu Ala Val Leu Val Ala Thr Asn Phe Phe Gly He Asn Thr He 930 935 940 Pro He Ala He Asn Glu Ala Glu Tyr Val Glu Met Trp Val Arg Ala 945 950 955 960 Ala Thr Thr Met Ala Thr Tyr Ser Thr Val Ser Arg Ser Ala Leu Ser 965 970 975 Ala Met Pro His Thr Ser Pro Pro Pro Leu He Leu Lys Ser Asp Glu 980 985 990 Leu Leu Pro Asp Thr Gly Glu Asp Ser Asp Glu Asp Gly His Asn His 995 1000 1005 Gly Gly His Ser His Gly Gly His Ala Arg Met He Asp Asn Phe Phe 1010 1015 1020 Ala Glu He Leu Arg Gly Val Ser Ala Gly Arg He Val Trp Asp Pro 1025 1030 1035 1040 Val Asn Gly Thr Leu Asn Gly Leu Asp Tyr Asp Asp Tyr Val Tyr Pro 1045 1050 1055 Gly His Ala He Trp Trp Leu Ala Arg Gly Leu Glu Phe Phe Gin Asp 1060 1065 1070 Gly Glu Gin Phe Gly Glu Leu Leu Phe Thr Asn Pro Thr Gly Ala Phe 1075 1080 1085 Gin Phe Leu Leu Tyr Val Val Val Val Asp Leu Pro Thr His He Ala 1090 1095 1100 Gin He Ala Thr Trp Leu Gly Gin Tyr Pro Gin Leu Leu Ser Ala Ala 1105 1110 1115 1120 Leu Thr Gly Val He Ala His Leu Gly Ala He Thr Gly Leu Ala Gly 1125 1130 1135 Leu Ser Gly Leu Ser Ala He Pro Ser Ala Ala He Pro Ala Val Val 1140 1145 1150 Pro Glu Leu Thr Pro Val Ala Ala Ala Pro Pro Met Leu Ala Val Ala 1155 - 1160 1165 Gly Val Gly Pro Ala Val Ala Ala Pro Gly Met Leu Pro Ala Ser Ala 1170 1175 1180 Pro Ala Pro Ala Ala Ala Ala Gly Ala Thr Ala Ala Gly Pro Thr Pro 1185 1190 1195 1200 Pro Ala Thr Gly Phe Gly Gly Leu Pro Ala Leu Pro Gly Arg Arg Trp 1205 1210 1215 Arg Pro Arg Asn Arg Val Arg Leu Gly Thr Val Gly Pro Arg Gin Gly 1220 1225 1230 Arg Gly Val Arg Phe Arg Cys Ser Arg Val Gly Gly Pro Gly Leu Gly 1235 1240 1245 Ala Cys Ala Gly Ala Cys Cys Thr Ala Gly Pro Leu Gly Gly Lys Ala 1250 1255 1260 Arg Gly His Arg Asp Glu Phe 1265 1270

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method of transforming a slow-growing mycobacterium with heterologous DNA, comprising the steps of: a) combining a slow-growing mycobacterium and he- terologous DNA to be transformed into the slow- growing mycobacterium, thereby producing a com¬ bination; and b) subjecting the combination produced in (a) to electroporation in water, under conditions suf- ficient for introduction of the heterologous DNA into slow-growing mycobacterium, thereby producing a slow-growing mycobacterium trans¬ formed with the heterologous DNA. 2. The method of Claim 1 wherein the slow-growing myco- bacterium of (a) have been exposed to glycine, prior to being combined with the heterologous DNA. 3. The method of Claim 2 wherein the slow-growing myco¬ bacterium are exposed to approximately 1.5% glycine present in culture medium in which the slow-growing mycobacterium is growing. 4. The method of Claim 1 in which the slow-growing mycobacterium is continuously propagated in mid-log phase. 5. The method of Claim 1 wherein the slow-growing myco¬ bacterium is selected from the group consisting of: Mycobacterium bovis BCG, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium avium. Mvcobacte- rium africanum and Mycobacterium intracellulare. 6. The method of Claim 5 wherein the heterologous DNA comprises DNA homologous to genomic DNA of the slow- growing mycobacterium combined in step (a) with the heterologous DNA. 7. The method of Claim 6 wherein the heterologous DNA is introduced into the uraA locus of the slow-growing mycobacterium. 8. The method of Claim 6 wherein the heterologous DNA additionally comprises DNA which is not homologous to genomic DNA of the slow-growing mycobacterium com¬ bined in step (a) with the heterologous DNA. 9. The method of Claim 8 wherein the heterologous DNA is introduced into the uraA locus of the slow-growing mycobacterium. 10. The method of Claim 6 wherein the slow-growing myco¬ bacterium is Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the DNA homologous to genomic DNA of the slow-growing myco¬ bacterium is introduced into genomic DNA in a loca¬ tion which results in attenuation of the Mycobacteri- u tuberculosis. 11. The method of Claim 6 wherein the slow-growing myco¬ bacterium is I tuberculosis and the heterologous DNA comprises DNA homologous to genomic DNA of JL. tuber¬ culosis selected from the group consisting of: the katG gene, the Hsp60 gene, aroA, lysA, uraA and M. tuberculosis DNA associated with entry into and survival inside cells. 12. A method of producing a heterologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacterium having heterologous DNA incorporated into genomic DNA at a homologous locus, comprising the steps of: a) combining a slow-growing mycobacterium and he¬ terologous DNA to be transformed into the slow- growing mycobacterium, the heterologous DNA comprising DNA homologous to genomic DNA of the slow-growing mycobacterium, thereby producing a combination; and b) subjecting the combination produced in (a) to electroporation in water, under conditions suf- ficient for introduction of the heterologous DNA into the slow-growing mycobacterium and inte¬ gration into genomic DNA of the slow-growing mycobacterium at a homologous locus, thereby producing a homologously recombinant slow- growing mycobacterium having heterologous DNA incor¬ porated into its genomic DNA at a homologous locus. 13. The method of Claim 12 wherein the slow-growing myco¬ bacterium of (a) has been exposed to glycine, prior to being combined with the heterologous DNA. 14. The method of Claim 13 wherein the slow-growing myco- bacterium is exposed to approximately 1.5% glycine present in culture medium in which the slow-growing mycobacterium is growing. 15. The method of Claim 12 in which the slow-growing mycobacterium is continuously propagated in mid-log phase. 16. The method of Claim 12 wherein the slow-growing myco¬ bacterium is selected from the group consisting of: Mycobacterium bovis BCG, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium avium. Mycobacte- rium africanum and Mycobacterium intracellulare. 17. The method of Claim 12 wherein the heterologous DNA additionally comprises DNA which is not homologous to genomic DNA of the slow-growing mycobacterium com¬ bined in step (a) with the heterologous DNA. 18. The method of Claim 17 wherein the slow-growing mycobacterium is Mycobacterium bovis BCG and the DNA homologous to genomic DNA of the slow-growing myco¬ bacterium is DNA contained in the Mycobacterium bovis BCG orotidine-5- monophosphate decarboxylase gene locus or its flanking sequences. 19. A method of producing attenuated Mycobacterium tuber¬ culosis, comprising inactivating or deleting in Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA selected from the group consisting of: the katG gene, the Hsp60 gene, aroA, lysA, uraA and DNA associated iwth entry into and survival inside cells of Mycobacterium tuberculo¬ sis. 20. A method of producing attenuated Mycobacterium tuber¬ culosis comprising introducing into NL . tuberculosis heterologous DNA by: a) combining Mycobacterium tuberculosis and heter¬ ologous DNA, thereby producing a combination; and b) subjecting the combination produced in a) to electroporation in water, under conditions suf¬ ficient for introduction of the heterologous DNA into the Mycobacterium tuberculosis, wherein the heterologous DNA is homologous to Myco¬ bacterium tuberculosis genomic DNA selected from the group consisting of: the katG gene, the HspβO gene, aroA, lysA, uraA and ^ _ tuberculosis DNA associated with entry into and survival inside cells and is introduced into genomic DNA of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis, thereby deleting or disrupting the corresponding Mycobacterium tuberculosis genomic DNA. 21. The method of Claim 20 wherein the Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been exposed to glycine prior to being combined with the heterologous DNA. 22. The method of Claim 21 wherein the Mycobacterium tuberculosis are exposed to approximately 1.5% gly¬ cine present in culture medium in which the Mycobac¬ terium tuberculosis is growing. 23. The method of Claim 20 in which the Mycobacterium tuberculosis is continuously propagated in mid-log phase. 24. The method of Claim 20 wherein the heterologous DNA additionally comprises DNA which is not homologous to Mycobacterium tuberculosis genomic DNA. 25. A DNA construct consisting essentially of: a) DNA homologous to genomic DNA of a slow-growing mycobacterium which is a genetic marker; and b) DNA nonhomologous to genomic DNA of the slow- growing mycobacterium, wherein the DNA nonhomologous to genomic DNA of the slow-growing mycobacterium is flanked by the DNA homologous to genomic DNA of a slow-growing mycobac¬ terium. 26. The DNA construct of Claim 25 wherein the slow-grow¬ ing mycobacterium is Mycobacterium bovis BCG and the genetic marker is the orotidine-5- monophosphate decarboxylase gene locus. 27. A homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacterium having incorporated therein heterologous DNA homolo¬ gous to genomic DNA of the slow-growing mycobacteri¬ um. 28. The homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacte¬ rium of Claim 27, wherein the heterologous DNA is incorporated into mycobacterial genomic DNA which is a genetic marker. 29. The homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacte- rium of Claim 28, wherein the slow-growing mycobacte¬ rium is Mycobacterium bovis BCG and the genetic marker is the orotidine-5- monophosphate decarboxyl¬ ase gene locus. 30. The homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacte- rium of Claim 29, wherein the heterologous DNA addi¬ tionally comprises DNA nonhomologous to genomic DNA of the slow-growing mycobacterium. 31. The homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacte¬ rium of Claim 30, wherein the DNA nonhomologous to genomic DNA of the slow-growing mycobacterium is DNA encoding a protein or polypeptide selected from the group consisting of: antigens, enzymes, cytokines, lymphokines and immunopotentiators. 32. The homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacte¬ rium of Claim 30, wherein the nonhomologous DNA encodes an antigen of a pathogen. 33. The homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacte- rium of Claim 27, wherein the heterologous DNA is not expressed and incorporation of the heterologous DNA homologous to genomic DNA of the slow-growing myco¬ bacterium into the genomic DNA inactivates or acti¬ vates a gene in the genomic DNA. 34. The homologously recombinant slow-growing mycobacte¬ rium of Claim 27 wherein the slow-growing mycobacte¬ rium is Mj . tuberculosis and the gene in the genomic DNA is selected from the group consisting of: the katG gene, the Hsp60 gene, aroA, lysA, uraA and ML. tuberculosis DNA associated with entry into and survival inside cells of Mj. tuberculosis. 35. Isolated DNA of mycobacterial origin encoding orotidine-5' -monophosphate decarboxylase. 36. Isolated DNA of Claim 35 having the nucleotide se- quence of SEQ ID No. 1 from nucleotide 1691 through and including nucleotide 2512. 37. Isolated orotidine-5' -monophosphate decarboxylase of mycobacterial origin. 38. Isolated orotidine-5' -monophosphate decarboxylase of Claim 37 encoded by DNA having the nucleotide se¬ quence of SEQ ID No. 1 from nucleotide 1691 through and including nucleotide 2512.

Inventors: ALDOVINI ANNA, YOUNG RICHARD A, ALDOVINI, ANNA, YOUNG, RICHARD, A.
Applicants: WHITEHEAD BIOMEDICAL INST, WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
Application year: 1994
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: C12N9, C12N13, C12N15