Weighing machine with stoppage of vibration correction

Abstract: A weighing machine comprises a scale cell for weighing an object and outputting a weight signal indicative of measured weight value of said object. A vibration-detecting cell is set on the same floor as said scale cell for outputting a floor vibration signal indicative of the vibration of said floor. A correcting circuit (14) corrects said weight signal on the basis of said floor vibration signal output from said vibration-detecting cell and thereby generates a vibration corrected signal indicative of corrected weight value of said object not containing effects of said vibration of said floor. A correction control circuit (120) detects vibration components of said floor and stops operations of said correcting circuit (14) by comparing said vibration components with a reference value.

Description: This invention relates to weighing machines using load sensors such as load cells set on a floor to measure the weight of articles such as food items and industrial machine parts. More particularly, the invention relates to means for correcting the effects of lower-frequency floor vibrations on weight signals generated and processed by such a weighing machine. Floor vibrations usually have lower frequencies than the vibrations caused by an object as it is placed on a weighing machine to be weighed. Thus, it may be thought that a filter can be used to eliminate such lower-frequency vibrations from the weight signals, but the cutoff frequency of the filter must be set low, and this makes the filtering time longer, adversely affecting the speed of weight measurements. U.S. Patent 4,624,331 disclosed a weighing machine having not only a scale cell for measuring the weight of an object and outputting a weight signal indicative of the measured weight, but also a dummy cell set on the same floor as the scale cell such that the effects of the floor vibrations can be eliminated from the weight signal by inverting the dummy signal outputted from the dummy cell and adding it to the weight signal from the scale cell. In this manner, the cutoff frequency of the filter can be set higher, and hence the weighing speed is not reduced. With a prior art weighing machine of this type, however, the scale cell and the dummy cell must be set close to each other because the floor at the positions of the two cells is assumed to be vibrating under the same conditions. If the conditions of vibrations are different at the positions of the cells, corrections cannot be effected accurately by subtracting the dummy signal of the dummy cell from the weight signal. There may even be situations where the error becomes magnified by the "correction". In short, the choice of the position for installing the dummy cell becomes extremely limited, and the degree of freedom in designing the weighing machine is reduced. If there is not much free space in the neighborhood of the scale cell, in particular, it is extremely difficult to find an adequate place for installing the dummy cell for this purpose. It now goes without saying that the difficulty of this kind is magnified in the case of a combinational weighing machine having a plurality of scale cells and calculating combinations of weight signals therefrom to select a particular combination satisfying a predetermined criterion because each of a large number (such as 10 or 14) of scale cells will have to be provided with a dummy cell associated therewith. Moreover, this has the adverse effects of making the machine large and complicated in structure. Japanese Patent Publication Tokkai 64-32122 disclosed a combinational weighing machine adapted to determine the vibration characteristics of the floor from the average of weight signals outputted from those load sensors not selected in the preceding cycle of combinational calculations and to thereby correct the signals outputted from the selected load sensors. This correction routine is based, however, on the assumption that the floor vibrations are identical at the positions of the plurality of load sensors. If this assumption does not hold, the effects of floor vibrations cannot be eliminated accurately by subtracting such an average value. Another problem with prior art methods using a scale cell in combination with another cell for detecting the floor vibrations relates to the difference in sensitivity between the two cells. In other words, signal levels from these two cells are usually different even if they are subjected to identical loads. This difference in sensitivity is due not only to the material, shape, size and fabrication conditions of the cells (or sensitivity difference characteristically of the cells) but also to the difference in the load. By prior art correction methods by subtracting the signal indicative of the floor vibrations from the weight signal only the sensitivity difference characteristic of the cells (hereinafter referred to as the cell sensitivity) was corrected. This was in part because the weight of the target object, which is to be determined, is a part of the load on the scale cell and is basically an unknown. Since the load on the scale cell may be very different from the load on the vibration-detecting cell, however, prior art correction methods ignoring the sensitivity differences due to the difference in load (hereinafter referred to as the weight sensitivity) cannot be accurate. Accuracy in measurements is believed to decline as the weight of the object being weighed increases. In accordance with the present invention, a weighing machine comprises a scale cell for weighing an object and outputting a weight signal indicative of measured weight value of said object; a vibration-detecting cell set on a same floor as said scale cell for outputting a floor vibration signal indicative of the vibration of said floor; correcting means for correcting said weight signal on the basis of said floor vibration signal outputted from said vibration-detecting cell and thereby generating vibration corrected signal indicative of corrected weight value of said object not containing effects of said vibration of said floor; and correction control means for detecting vibration components of said floor and stopping operations of said correcting means by comparing said vibration components with a reference value. The invention provides a weighing machine capable of accurately removing the effects of floor vibrations from weight signals to thereby yield highly accurate results of weighing. Further the invention provides means for accurately and quickly removing the effects of floor vibrations on weight values obtained by a weighing machine independent of the size of the weight of the object being weighed. Weighing machines in accordance with the invention can be made compact and to cost less. In some aspects, the weighing machine does not require any extra dummy or vibration-detecting cells or amplifiers therefor but is still capable of accurately removing the effects of floor vibrations from weight signals even in situations where the conditions of vibrations are different at the positions of its load sensors. The invention can also provide a weighing machine capable of providing an accurate weight value independent of whether the amplitude of floor vibrations is large or small. The weighing machine may preferably also comprise a cell sensitivity setting means for setting cell sensitivity ratio at least between the scale cells and the dummy cells (and possibly also among the scale cells and among the dummy cells) on the basis of the loads on the dummy cells and those of the scale cells when not carrying any object to be weighed and the spring constants of the scale and dummy cells, and also a cell sensitivity correcting means for generating cell sensitivity corrected signals to correct at least a weight signal or a dummy signal by using the aforementioned cell sensitivity ratio. Still more preferably, such a weighing machine may additionally comprise a weight sensitivity calculating means for calculating weight sensitivity ratio at least between the scale cells and the dummy cells (and possibly also among the scale cells) corresponding to the weight of the object to be weighed and a weight sensitivity correcting means for generating weight sensitivity corrected signals by using the aforementioned weight sensitivity ratio to correct at least either the weight or dummy signals. With a weighing machine thus structured, the vibration modes of the floor at the positions of the scale cells are detected by the dummy cells, and the vertical displacements of the floor at these positions are calculated and used for correcting the weight signals. Accordingly, the weight signals can be accurately corrected even if the vibrating conditions of the floor are different at the positions of the scale and dummy cells. In other words, the dummy cells do not have to be necessarily installed close to the scale cells, and hence the degree of structural freedom of the weighing machine is improved. With the cell sensitivity correcting means, generation of errors due to differences in sensitivity of the cells can be prevented and the accuracy in correction can be improved. With the weight sensitivity calculating means, generation of errors due to changes in sensitivity due to the weight of the object being weighed can also be prevented and the accuracy in correction can be further improved. The weighing machine may carry out cycles of combinational calculations to thereby select a combination of said weight signals satisfying a preset criterion, and discharging objects weighed by those of said load sensors which outputted said selected combination of weight signals, wherein the dummy cells are defined by the floor vibration calculating means as those scale cells whose weight signals not selected in the preceding cycle of the combinational calculations. This weighing machine may preferably also comprise a cell sensitivity correcting means for generating cell sensitivity corrected signals and, more preferably, also a weight sensitivity calculating means for generating weight sensitivity corrected signals. The main advantage of this weighing machine is that neither dummy cells structured identically to the scale cells nor amplifiers therefore are needed for eliminating the effects of floor vibrations and hence that the cost of the weighing machine can be reduced. The dummy signals are used to calculate the vertical displacements of the floor as explained above regarding a weighing machine according to the first aspect of the invention. Cell sensitivity correcting means and weight sensitivity calculating means similarly contribute to further improving the accuracy in the corrections. The floor vibration correcting means may include: cell sensitivity setting means for setting sensitivity ratio K between said scale cell when not subjected to the weight of any object to be weighed and said dummy cells; initial load setting means for setting initial load M of said scale cell when not subjected to the weight of any object to be weighed; and weight calculating means for calculating a weight value m of said object according to m = {W(t) - κV(t)}/{1 + (κ/M)V(t)} where W(t) is said weight component and V(t) is said vibration component. In this case, the floor vibration correcting means serves to eliminate the effects of floor vibrations obtained from the vibration-detecting cell from the weight value of the object being weighed contained in the weight signal when the weight of this object has been added, and this floor vibration correcting means comprises a cell sensitivity setting means for setting the sensitivity ratio κ between the scale cell when the weight of the object is not added and the vibration-detecting cell, an initial load setting means for setting an initial load value M for the scale cell when the weight of the object is not applied, and a weight calculating means for calculating the weight m of the object by a formula rather than by carrying out a time-consuming feedback process. A weighing machine according to the present invention may also be adapted to provide accurate weight values independent of whether the amplitude of floor vibrations is large or small. Such a weighing machine may comprise, in addition to scale cells and dummy cells (the roles of which may be played by those of the scale cells not selected in the previous cycle of combinational calculation) as described above, not only a correcting circuit for correcting weight signals outputted from the scale cells on the basis of floor vibration signals outputted from the dummy cells and thereby generating vibration corrected signal indicative of corrected weight values not containing effects of the floor vibrations, but also correction control means for detecting amplitudes of the floor vibrations and stopping the operation of the correcting circuit if the detected amplitudes are not large enough, as compared to present reference values. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate several embodiments of the invention and comparative examples, to explain the principles of the invention. The correction control means 120 of single independent claim 1 are firstly described with Figure 13. In the drawings: Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a signal processing system according to a first comparative example of a combinational weighing machine; Fig. 2 is a block diagram of the CPU of Fig. 1; Fig. 3 shows the shape and deformation of a load cell for explaining the theory of AFV (anti-floor vibration) technology: Fig. 4 shows the positioning of the load cell of Fig. 3; Fig. 5 is a block diagram of another CPU which may be used in place of the CPU shown in Fig. 1; Fig. 6 is a model of oscillating system which is equivalent to Fig. 5; Fig. 7 is a schematic side view of a combinational weighing machine to which the present invention can be applied; Fig. 8 is a block diagram of a signal processing system according to a second comparative example of a combinational weighing machine structured as shown in Fig. 7; Fig. 9 is a block diagram of the CPU of Fig. 8; Fig. 10 is a block diagram of another CPU which may be used in place of the CPU shown in Fig. 9; Fig. 11 is a block diagram of a signal processing system for a weighing machine according to a third comparative example; Fig. 12 is a block diagram of a signal processing system according to a fourth comparative example; and, Figs. 13-18 are block diagrams of CPUs which may be used in place of the CPU shown in Fig. 2 in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Throughout the drawings, those components which are equivalent to one another, or at least substantially similar, are indicated by the same numerals, and their descriptions are not always repeated. Detailed Description of the Invention In what follows, the invention is described more in detail by way of some specific examples. With reference first to Fig. 1 which represents a signal processing system according to a first comparative example of a combinational weighing machine, there are a plural m-number of load sensors 1 1 -1 m each comprising a weigh hopper 2 1 -2 m and a scale call 3 1 -3 m such that objects X 1 -X m placed in the weigh hoppers 2 1 -2 m are weighed respectively by the corresponding ones of the scale cells 3 1 -3 m and analog weight signals W 1 -W m representing their weights are outputted. There are also a plural n-number of dummy cells 4 1 -4 n installed through frames FR on the same floor F as the scale cells 3 1 -3 m , being adapted to output analog dummy signals D 1 -D n caused by the floor vibrations. The dummy cells 4 1 -4 n may be installed either on the frames for the weighing machine or on separately prepared frames. The analog weight signals W 1 -W m outputted from the load sensors 1 1 -1 m are amplified by amplifiers 6 1 -6 m and inputted into a multiplexer 5. The dummy signals D 1 -D n from the dummy cells 4 1 -4 n are also amplified by amplifiers 7 1 -7 n and inputted into the same multiplexer 5. The signals W 1 -W m and D 1 -D n , selectively outputted from the multiplexer 5 in response to a switch signal c from a CPU 9, are converted into digital signals by an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter 8. The CPU 9, which also serves as a calculating means, carries out vibration corrections and combinational calculations by using the digital weight and dummy signals W 1 -W m and D 1 -D n received through the A/D converter 8 and outputs open signals OS for selectively opening a combination of weigh hoppers 2 1 -2 m which satisfies a preset criterion (such as having the total weight closest to a preset target weight value). Low frequency floor vibration components are thus eliminated such that the cutoff frequency of filters (to be explained below) can be set relatively high and the weighing speed can be improved. With reference next to Fig. 2, the CPU 9 contains digital filters 10 1 -10 m and 11 1 -11 n . The weight and dummy signals W 1 -W m and D 1 -D n , which are selectively outputted from the multiplexer 5 and converted into digital signals by the A/D converter 8, are passed through a switching circuit 12 and corresponding one of the digital filters 10 1 -10 m and 11 1 -11 n such that their components with relatively high frequencies, generated principally when objects X to be weighed are put inside the weigh hoppers 2 1 -2 m , are eliminated. The CPU 9 also includes a floor vibration calculating means 13 for detecting the vibration mode of the floor on the basis of the digital dummy signals D 1 -D n received through the filters 11 1 -11 n , calculating therefrom the vertical displacements of the floor at the positions of the scale cells 1 1 -1 m and outputting displacement signals S 1 -S m indicative of these calculated vertical displacements of the floor. These displacement signals S 1 -S m are respectively received by floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m for respectively correcting the digital weight signals W 1 -W m received respectively through the filters 10 1 -10 m . In other words, the effects of the vibrations represented by the displacement signals S 1 -S m are subtracted from the measured weight values represented by the weight signals W 1 -W m to generate and output vibration corrected weight signals BS 1 -BS m . Low frequency components of the floor vibrations are thus corrected, and this makes it possible to set the cutoff frequencies of the filters 10 1 -10 m relatively high and to allow speedy weighing operations. The vibration corrected weight signals BS 1 -BS m thus outputted are received by a combination calculating means 20 for selecting a particular combination thereof in view of a preset criterion such that the total weight represented by such combination be the closest to a preset target weight value, and outputting an selection signal (or open signal) OS to open those of the weigh hoppers 2 1 -2 m corresponding to the selected combination. Since the correction operations are carried out digitally according to the illustrated example, more accurate corrections are possible than if they are done by using analog circuits among which there tend to be individual fluctuations. In general, a method, such as the one described above, of detecting the vibration modes of a floor and canceling the vibration components of scale cells at arbitrary positions thereon is referred to as a multi-point AFV (anti-floor vibration) procass. If the scale cells are distributed two-dimensionally (say, on a horizontal plane), floor vibrations arc detacted by dummy cells at three or more positions on the plane not in collinaar relationship, the vibration modes of the floor are detacted from the vibrations detected thereby, and the vibration components of the floor at arbitrary positions of the scale cells are obtained therefrom and subtracted from the weight values being outputted from the scale cells. Fig. 3 shows the structure of a load cell 3(4) used as the scale and dummy cells 3 1 -3 m and 4 1 -4 n in the weighing machine described above. A load cell 3(4) of this type is provided with four strain gauges 32 attached individually near one of four notches 31 formed in a central opening therethrough to detect its deformation in terms of the strains measured thereby. These four strain gauges 32 form a Wheatstone bridge (not shown) which is adapted such that its output changes only if the load call 3(4) is deformed into a parallelogram as shown by a broken line. In other words, there is no change in its output if the load cell 3(4) undergoes any other kind of deformation. Thus, when there is a relative deformation between the fixed side 3a(4a) of the load cell 3(4) where it is attached to the floor and the free side 3b(4b) where a load is applied (indicated by an arrow), only the component of a parallelogrammic deformation is detected. When such load cells 3(4) are used in a combinational weighing machine as described above, tharefore, only the perpendicular (vertical) components of the vibration modes of the floor need to be considered. Consider, for example, a load cell 3(4) affixed at a position P(x, y) on an X-Y plane as shown in Fig. 4. The motion of the X-Y plane can be described in terms of the rotation around the X-axis, the rotation around the Y-axis and the motion along an axis (the Z-axis) perpendicular to both the X-axis and the Y-axis. The other modes of motion will not be discussed here because they are not detected by the load cell 3(4). Now, let the motion in the Z-direction caused by a rotary motion around the X-axis be denoted by B(t), that caused by a rotary motion around the Y-axis by A(t) and the motion in the direction of the Z-axis by C(t). Of the output signal from the load call at position P, the component V P (t) contributed by the floor vibration is given as follows: V P (t) = xA(t)+yB(t)+C(t) In order to obtain the values of A(t), B(t) and C(t), it is theoretically sufficient to detect the floor motion at three positions not in a collinear relationship and solve linear simultaneous equations with three unknowns. In practice, however, motion is detected at more than three positions because the output from each load sensor contains some measurement errors, and A(t), B(t) and C(t) are obtained preferably by a method of least squares. It is the floor vibration calculating means 13 that calculates the values of V P (t) from A(t), B(t) and C(t) by using (1). Fig. 5 shows the structure of another CPU 9 1 which may be substituted for the CPU 9 shown in Fig. 2, being different therefrom in the following two aspects. Firstly, this CPU 9 1 additionally includes a cell sensitivity setting means 15 and a cell sensitivity correcting means 16. The cell sensitivity setting means is serves to preliminarily set a cell sensitivity ratio between the scale cells 3 and the dummy cells 4 on the basis of the loads on the dummy cells 4 (or 4 1 -4 n in Fig. 1), the loads on the scale cells 3 (or 3 1 -3 m in Fig. 1) and the spring constant of the scale and dummy cells 3 and 4. The cell sensitivity correcting means 16 is for using the call sensitivity ratio set by the cell sensitivity setting means 15 to thereby correct the dummy signals D (or D 1 -D n ) and generating cell sensitivity corrected signals CS 1 -CS n . secondly, there are further provided a weight sensitivity calculating means 17 and a weight sensitivity correcting means 18, which are for correcting the changes in sensitivity to the floor vibrations due to changes in the applied load. The weight sensitivity calculating means 17 serves to calculate the weight sensitivity ratio between the scale and dummy cells 3 and 4 as it changes according to the weights of the objects X being weighed. The weight sensitivity correcting means 18 serves to use the weight sensitivity ratio calculated by the weight sensitivity calculating means 17 to correct the displacement signals S 1 -S m outputted from the floor vibration calculating means 13 and to thereby generate weight sensitivity corrected signals WS 1 -WS m . With reference still to Fig. 5, wherein components which are substantially identical to those shown in and explained with reference to Fig. 2 are indicated by the same numerals, cell sensitivity corrections are performed by the cell sensitivity correcting means 16, and the dummy signals D 1 -D n are converted to the levels of the weight signals W 1 -W m by means of the cell sensitivity setting means 15. These converted signals (or the cell sensitivity corrected signals CS 1 -CS n ) are used by the floor vibration calculating means 13 to calculate the floor vibrations. Further, the weight sensitivity correcting means 18 carries out sensitivity corrections according to the weights of the objects applied to the scale cells 3 1 -3 m , thereby outputting weight sensitivity corrected signals WS 1 -WS m , which are used by the floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m to subtract the vibration components of the floor represented by the weight sensitivity corrected signals WS 1 -WS m from the weight signals W 1 -W m , thereby obtaining vibration corrected weight signals BS 1 -BS m . Corrections effected as explained above with reference to Fig, 5 can be more simply explained with reference to a model shown in Fig. 6 wherein the left-hand side and the right-hand side schematically represent a scale cell and a dummy cell, respectively. Let M 0 represent the load (as mass) on the free end of the dummy cell, M 1 represent the load (as mass) on the free end of the scale cell when carrying no object to be weighed, m represent the mass of an object to be weighed, and k 0 and k 1 be the spring constants respectively of the dummy and scale cells. If x 0 , x 1 and x B represent the displacements respectively of the free end of the dummy and scale cells and the floor F, the equations of motions of the free ends of the cells can be expressed as follows: Since each cell measures the relative displacement between the floor and its loaded end, (11) and (12) can be written as follows: where x 1B - x 1 - x B and x 0B = x 0 - x B . The displacement of the floor is considered an input and the cell output is considered an output of a system. Then, a transmission function relating the system input and output can be obtained from (13) and (14), and frequency characteristics G 1 (jω) and G 0 (jω) on the weighing side and the floor side become as follows: G 1 (jω) = ω 2 / (ω 1 2 - ω 2 ) G 0 (jω) = ω 2 /(ω 0 2 - ω 2 ) where ω 1 2 = k 1 / (m + M 1 ) and ω 0 2 = k 0 /M 0 , that is, ω 1 is the characteristic frequency of the scale cell and ω 0 is the characteristic frequency of the dummy cell The sensitivity ratio β between the scale cell side and the dummy cell side is, therefore, β = G 1 (jω)/G 0 (jω) = (ω 0 2 - ω 2 )/(ω 1 2 - ω 2 ) = (ω 0 2 /ω 1 2 ){1 - (ω/ω 0 ) 2 }/{1 - (ω/ω 1 ) 2 } If 1 > (ω/ω 0 ) 2 and 1 > (ω/ω 1 ) 2 , or if the characteristic frequency is much higher than the frequency requiring correction both on the scale cell side and the dummy cell side, (17) becomes as follows: β = ω 0 2 /ω 1 2 = {1+ (m/M 1 )}(k 0 M 1 /k 1 M 0 ) The second factor on the right-hand side of (18) represents the value of the sensitivity ratio between the two cells when m = 0, that is, when there is no object being weighed. The first factor on the right-hand side of (18) represents the change in the sensitivity of the scale cell when the weight of the object (of mass m) is applied to the scale cell, that is, the weight sensitivity ratio between the two cells. In practice, the cell sensitivity ratio is preliminarily determined from the simple expression k 0 M 1 /k 1 M 0 . Thereafter, this value is set as the cell sensitivity ratio by means of the cell sensitivity setting means 15, and the cell sensitivity is corrected by the cell sensitivity correcting means 16. On the other hand, the weight sensitivity calculating means 17 calculates the weight sensitivity ratio from the expression {1+ (m/M 1 )}, or the first factor on the right-hand side of (18), and correction of the weight sensitivity is carried cut by the weight sensitivity correcting means 18. The weight sensitivity correction may be carried out by using one of the scale cells as a standard to carry out weight sensitivity corrections between a plurality of scale and dummy cells and weight sensitivity corrections among the scale cells. Weight signal corrections can thus be carried out extremely accurately. As a variation to the above, the cell sansitivity correcting means 16 and the weight sensitivity correcting means 18 may be connected to the output side of the digital filters 10 1 -10 m for the weight signals such that one of the dummy cells 4 is used as a standard for correcting the sensitivities of the weight signals W 1 -W m by converting them to the level of the dummy signals D 1 -D n to thereby carry out the floor vibration corrections. In this situation, however, sensitivity corrected weight signals W 1 -W m must be corrected again back to the level before the corrections. As another variation to the above, the cell sensitivity correcting means 16 say be connected both to the sides of the weight signals and the dummy signals so as to be able to carry out cell sensitivity corrections not only between weight and dummy signals but also between weight signals and between dummy signals. In other words, the cell sensitivity and weight sensitivity correcting means 16 and 18 need only to be adapted to carry out sensitivity corrections according to at least one of either weight or dummy signals. As explained above, the use of digital filters (as opposed to analog filters) is preferred also in all these examples both described above and to be described below because analog filters tend to have large fluctuations in their characteristics, but this invention is not limited to the use of digital filters. If analog filters are to be used instead of, or in addition to, the digital filters shown at 10 1 -10 m and 11 1 -11 n , such analog filters are connected at 19 in Fig. 2. Fig. 7 shows schematically an example of combinational weighing machine to which the present invention can be effectively applied. In Fig. 7, numeral 60 indicates a dispersion table adapted to be vibrated and serving to radially disperse articles to be weighed as they are dropped from above and to thereby supply then to a plural m-number of weighing units 61 1 -61 m disposed radially around the periphery of the table 60. Each of the weighing units 61 1 -61 m is provided with a dispersion feeder 62 1 having an electromagnetic vibrator 62 ai and a trough 62 bi , a pool hopper 63 i , a pool hopper gate 64 i , a weigh hopper 65 i , a weigh hopper gate 66 i , a scale cell 67 i and a hopper gate driver 68 i , where i is an dummy index i = 1-m. The weigh hoppers 65 1 -65 m , and the scale cells 67 1 -67 m may be said to together form load sensors 41 1 -41 m . There is disposed below the load sensors 41 1 -41 m a collector chute 69 in the shape of a conic or polygonal funnel for receiving weighed articles discharged from the weigh hoppers 65 1 -65 m of the load sensors 41 1 -41 m . Numeral 70 indicates a base which is set on the same floor F. Since combinational weighing machines are well known and many structured as shown above have been described and sold commercially, the functions of each of these components will not be explained in detail herein. Fig. 8 represents a signal processing system according to a second comparative example of a combinational weighing machine structured as shown in Fig. 7. It is to be noted that this processing system is importantly different from the system shown in Fig. 1 in that there are no load cells identified specifically as dummy cells. As explained above with reference to Fig. 1, objects delivered to the weigh hoppers 65 1 -65 m are weighed by the scale cells 67 1 -67 m , and analog weight signals W 1 -W m indicative of the weight values obtained thereby are outputted therefrom, amplified by amplifiers 43 1 -43 m , received by a multiplexer 42, selectively outputted therefrom to an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter 44 in response to a switch signal c received from a CPU 45, and converted into digital weight signals. The CPU 45, like the CPUs 9 and 9 1 described above with reference to Figs. 2 and 5, carries out vibration corrections and combinational calculations but by using only the digital weight signals W 1 -W m because there are no dummy cells outputting dummy signals. As shown in Fig. 9, the CPU 45 contains digital filters 46 1 -46 m . The weight signals W 1 -W m which are selectively outputted from the multiplexer 42 and converted into digital signals by the A/D converter 44, are passed through a switching circuit 47 and corresponding one of the digital filters 46 1 -46 m such that components with relatively high frequencies generated principally when objects to be weighed are put inside the weigh hoppers 65 1 -65 m are eliminated. Numeral 48 indicates a combination calculating means which functions like the one shown at 20 in Figs. 2 and 5. Digital weight signals W 1 -W m pass through floor vibration correcting means 50 (similar to the means 14 1 -14 m described above) and are inputted into the combination calculating means 48 as vibration corrected weight signals BS 1 -BS m . Combinations of these vibration corrected weight values are calculated and particular one of them satisfying a preset criterion is selected. Suppose, for example, that the combination corresponding to the three load sensors 41 1 -41 3 are selected. The combination calculating means 48 outputs an open signal OS to cause the weighed objects to be dropped from the corresponding hoppers 65 1 -65 3 to the chute 69. Normally, there are a plurality of load sensors that are not selected in a combination calculation. Let us assume that the load sensors 41 1 -41 m were among those not selected in the preceding cycle. This means that weighed objects remain inside the weigh hoppers 65 1 -65 m of these load sensors 41 1 -41 m and hence no new objects are supplied into them from the corresponding pool hoppers 63 1 -63 m for the next cycle of combinational calculations. As a result, no new vibrations will be caused to these weigh hoppers 65 i -65 m . In other words, the corresponding load sensors 41 i -41 m are subjected only to the vibrations of the floor F. Thus, the vibration components of the weight signals W i -W m shown in Fig. 9 become the same as those of the floor vibrations. It now goes without saying that the load sensors 41 i -41 m may include any of the load sensors 41 1 -41 3 which are selected. Another function of the combination calculating means 48 is to treat those of the weight signals W i -W m which were not selected in the preceding cycle of combinational calculations and output them as digital dummy signals D i -D m to a floor vibration calculating means 49 for calculating the vibration mode of the floor on the basis of the vibration components of the received dummy signals D i -D m to thereby calculate the vertical displacements of the floor at the positions of the load sensors 41 1 -41 m and to output displacement signals S 1 -S m indicative of the calculated displacements to the floor vibration correcting means 50. The floor vibration correcting means 50 serves to use the received displacement signals S 1 -S m to correct the weight signals W 1 -W m , that is, to subtract the effects of the floor vibrations represented by the displacement signals S 1 -S m from the weight values of the weighed objects represented by the weight signals W 1 -W m , thereby eliminating the effects of low-frequency floor vibrations and generating and outputting vibration corrected weight signals BS 1 -BS m representing vibration corrected weight values. The combination calculating means 48 receives these vibration corrected weight signals BS 1 -BS m and outputs an open signal OS to those of the hopper gate drivers 68 1 -68 m corresponding to selected ones of the load sensors 41 1 -41 m by the combinational calculations, causing weighed objects to be discharged from the corresponding ones of the weigh hoppers 65 1 -65 m to the collector chute 69. This allows the cutoff frequencies of the filters 46 1 -46 m to be set relatively high and reduces the time required for the combinational calculations. The method of calculating the vertical displacements was already explained above with reference to the weighing machine according to the first comparative example and hence will not be repeated here. Fig. 10 shows the structure of another CPU 45' which may be substituted for the CPU 45 shown in Fig. 9, being different therefrom in the following two aspects. Firstly, the CPU 45' additionally includes a call sensitivity setting means 55 and a call sensitivity correcting means 56. The cell sensitivity setting means 55 serves to preliminarily set a cell sensitivity ratio among the scale cells 67 1 -67 m on the basis of the spring constant of the scale cells 67 1 -67 m and the loads on the scale cells 67 1 -67 m when no objects to be weighed are in the corresponding weigh hoppers 66 i -66 m . The cell sensitivity correcting means 56 is for using the cell sensitivity ratio set by the cell sensitivity setting means 55 to thereby correct the dummy signals D i -D m and generating cell sensitivity corrected signals CS i -CS n . Secondly, there are further provided a weight sensitivity calculating means 57 and a weight sensitivity correcting means 58, which are for correcting the changes in sensitivity to the floor vibrations due to changes in the applied load. The functions of these additional means, as well as the correction formulas used thereby, have been described above with reference to Fig. 5 except the dummy signals D i -D m according to this embodiment of the invention are not from cells specifically designated as dummy cells but from those of the scale cells which were not selected in the preceding cycle of combinational calculations. Thus, they will not be described here repeatedly. It now goes without saying that any of the cells can serve both as a scale cell and a dummy cell and that ω 1 = ω 0 in such a situation. Advantages of using digital filters (as opposed to analog filters) have also been discussed above with reference to Figs. 2 and 5. If analog filters are to be used instead of, or in addition to, the digital filters 46 1 -46 m in connection with the second comparative example, such analog filters are connected at 49 in Fig. 8. It is to be reminded that the disclosure given above for the second comparative example can be applied also to combinational weighing machines having weighing units arranged linearly, instead of in a circular formation. Another signal processing system according to a third comparative example described next with reference to Fig. 11. For simplicity, this signal processing system is described as applied not to a combinational weighing machine with a plurality of weighing units but only to a combination of one weighing unit 81 having a weigh hopper 82 and a scale call 83 and a vibration-detecting cell 84 which may be an equivalent of a dummy cell shown in Pig. 1 or one of the scale cells shown in Fig. 8 not selected in the preceding cycle of combinational calculations. In other words, this signal processing system described in Fig. 11 may be interpreted as being applied to a part of a combinational weighing machine. When an object X to be weighed is placed inside the weigh hopper 82, the scale cell 83 outputs an analog weight signal W. The vibration-detecting cell 84 is attached through a frame FR to the same floor F as the scale cell 83 and is adapted to output an analog floor vibration signal V indicative of the vibratory motion of the floor F. The signals W and V from these two cells 83 and 84 are amplified by amplifiers 85 and 86 and converted into digital signals by means of analog-to-digital (A/D) converters 87 and 88, respectively. The digitalized weight and floor vibration signals W and V are received by a CPU 89 provided with digital filters 90 and 91 for removing therefrom high-frequency vibration components introduced mainly when the object X is loaded, a floor vibration correcting means 92 for removing the digital floor vibration signal V from the digital weight signal W, a repeating means 93 to be described below and a repetition frequency setting means 94 for setting the number of repetitions for the repeating means 93. The floor vibration correcting means 92 includes a cell sensitivity correcting means 95 for correcting the sensitivity difference of the cells 83 and 84 with respect to the floor vibrations by adjusting the signal level of the floor vibration signal V, a weight sensitivity correcting means 96 for correcting the sensitivity of the scale cell 83 caused by the application of the load due to the object X, and a subtracting means 97 for subtracting the digital floor vibration signal V from the digital weight signal W to thereby output a vibration-corrected weight signal W indicative of the weight (as mass) m of the object X with the effects of the floor vibrations removed. The call sensitivity correcting means 95 and the weight sensitivity correcting means 96 may alternatively be adapted to adjust the signal level of the digital weight signal W to correct the sensitivity difference of the cells 83 and 84 with respect to the floor vibrations or that against changes in the load applied thereon. The repeating means 93 is for inputting into the weight sensitivity correcting means 96 the weight m of the object X outputted from the subtracting means 97 and causing the weight sensitivity correction of the scale cell 83 repeated by the number of times specified by the repetition frequency setting means 94 (say, twice). Next will be explained the method of correcting the effect of floor vibrations by using the floor vibration correcting means 92 structured as described above. As the object X is placed inside the weigh hopper 82, the analog weight signal W outputted from the scale cell 83 indicative of the weight of the object X is amplified by the amplifier 85 and then passed through the A/D converter 87 to be converted into a digital signal. Subsequently, this digital weight signal w is received by the CPU 89, passed through the digital filter 90 to have relatively high-frequency vibration components removed therefrom and inputted into the floor vibration correcting means 92. At the same time, the analog floor vibration signal V outputted from the vibration-detecting cell 84 is amplified by the amplifier 86 and then converted into a digital signal by passing through the A/D converter 88. This digital floor vibration signal is inputted into the CPU 89, passed through the digital filter 91 and inputted into the floor vibration correcting means 92 after relatively high-frequency vibration components are removed. Of the signals W and V thus inputted into the floor vibration correcting means 92, the digital floor vibration signal V has its level adjusted by the cell sensitivity correcting means 95 and the sensitivity difference of the cells 83 and 84 with respect to the floor vibrations is corrected. Next, the weight sensitivity correcting means 96 serves to correct, on the basis of the digital weight signal W, the sensitivity difference of the cells 83 and 84 due to application of the weight of the object X. Finally, the sensitivity corrected digital floor vibration signal V is subtracted by the subtracting means 97 from the digital weight signal W to thereby generate and output a vibration corrected signal W indicative of the mass m of the object X. The corrected weight signal W c (t) thus obtained by the operation of the floor vibration correcting means 92 can be expressed as follows: W c (t) = W(t) - κ{(M + m)/M}V(t) where W(t) is the output from the scale cell (weight signal) before the correction, κ is the sensitivity ratio between the cells, M is the initial load on the scale cell, and m is the weight of the object to be weighed. In the above, the factor (M + m)/M represents the weight sensitivity ratio between the cells 83 and 84. As is clear from (20), the scale cell 83 is subjected not only to its initial load M but also to the weight m of the object X, but the vibration-detecting cell 84 is not subjected to such an additional load. When the object X is loaded, therefore, the sensitivity against the floor vibrations becomes (M + m)/M times greater for the scale cell 83 as compared to the vibration-detecting cell 84. In other words, a correction due to the mass m of the object X becomes desirable. The mass m, however, is not of a preliminarily known value but is a target value to be determined. In other words, its value is not determined at the time of the correction operations. Thus, the weight sensitivity of the scale cell 83 is not corrected at once, but by a feedback process whereby the vibration component V is first detected by the vibration-datecting cell 84, the corrected weight signal W c (t) is calculated by the floor vibration correcting means 92 by (20) and the corrected weight signal W c (t) thus obtained is then fad back into the weight sensitivity correcting means 96. This feedback process is repeated by the repetition number set by the repetition frequency setting means 94, such as twice, to improve the accuracy of weight sensitivity correction. Although the cell sensitivity correcting means 95 is provided in the example described above with reference to Fig. 11, it may be omitted if the cell sensitivity difference between the two cells 83 and 84 is negligibly small. Although Fig. 11 shows an embodiment with one scale cell and one vibration-detecting call, this embodiment is applicable equally well to a situation with one or more scale cells and a plurality of vibration-detection cells such that the vibration mode of the floor is determined on the basis of the vibration components of the floor detected by the vibration-detection calls to calculate the vertical displacements of the floor at the position of each of the scale cells. Fig. 12 is a block diagram of still another signal processing system according to a fourth comparative example which is similar in part to the system described above with reference to Fig. 11. So, the components therein which are substantially identical to corresponding ones shown in Fig. 11 are indicated by the same numerals and will not be explained again in detail. The CPU 89' for the system shown in Fig. 12 is different from the CPU 89 of Fig. 11 firstly in that it includes a first zero-point adjusting means 103 and a second zero-point adjusting means 104 for carrying out a zero-point adjustment respectively on the weight signal W and the floor vibration signal V digitalized by the digital filters 90 and 91 and outputting weight component W(t) corresponding to the weight m of the object X and floor vibration component V(t) corresponding to the floor vibrations. These components W(t) and v(t) are received by a floor vibration correcting means 102 for correcting the floor vibration component according to a formula to be described below to thereby output the mass m of the object X. The first zero-point adjusting means 103 is for detecting the weight signal level when the weight m of the object X is not being applied, either during a specially set zero-detecting time period before the day's weighing operation is started or during a regular weighing operation, storing it as the zero-level and subtracting this zero-level from the weight signal W outputted from the scale cell 83 loaded with the object X to thereby obtain a zero-adjusted weight signal, that is, the weight component W(t) corresponding to the weight m of the object X. The second zero-point adjusting means 104 is for passing the floor vibration signal V outputted from the vibration-detecting cell 84 during such a specially set zero-detecting time period through a strong filter, storing its output as the zero-level, and subtracting this zero-level from the floor vibration signal V to thereby obtain a zero-adjusted floor vibration signal, or the vibration component V(t) corresponding to the floor vibrations. The floor vibration correcting means 102 includes a cell sensitivity setting means 105, an initial load setting means 106 and a weight calculating means 107. The cell sensitivity setting means 105 is for setting the sensitivity ratio κ between the scale cell 83 when it is not loaded with any object and the vibration-detecting cell 84. The initial load setting means 106 is for setting the initial load K on the scale cell 83 when it is not loaded with any object. The weight calculating means 107 is for using the cell sensitivity ratio κ set in the cell sensitivity setting means 105 and the initial load M stored in the initial load setting means 106 to calculate the mass m of the object X. The sensitivity ratio κ and the initial load M are characteristic to the weighing machine and hence of known values. The formula used by the weight calculating means 107 to calculate the weight (as mass) m of the object X is obtained by setting the left-hand side of (20) equal to m. This is because, as (20) is used repeatedly by initially setting m equal to an appropriate initial value, the left-hand side of (20), or the corrected value W c (t), eventually approaches the value to be treated as m. Thus, m = W(t) - κ{(M + m)/M}V(t) = W(t) - κV(t) - (κ/M)mV(t) or {1 + (κ/M)V(t)}m = W(t) - κV(t) Thus, m = {W(t) - κV(t)}/{1 + (κ/M)V(t)} where, as explained above, W(t) is the output from the scale cell after the zero-point adjustment (or weight component) and V(t) is the floor vibration component. Next, the method of floor vibration correction by a system thus structured will be explained. First, the digital weight signal W before the object X is placed in the weigh hopper 82 (for example, during a specially set zero-detecting time period before the day's continuous weighing operation is started or even during a regular weighing operation) is inputted into the first zero-point adjusting means 103 and its signal level is detected and stored as the zero-level. At the same time, the digital vibration detecting signal V outputted from the vibration-detecting call 84 is inputted into the second zero-point adjusting means 104 so as to be passed through a strong filter therein. The output therefrom is stored as the zero-level. Next, the sensitivity ratio κ between the scale cell 83 when it is not loaded with any object and the vibration-detecting cell 84 is inputted into and stored in the cell sensitivity setting means 105. At the same time, the initial load M of the scale cell 83 when it is not loaded with any object is inputted into and stored in the initial load setting means 106. If a weighing operation is started thereafter, an object X to be weighed is received by the weigh hopper 82, and the analog weight signal outputted from the scale cell 83 is amplified by the amplifier 85 and converted by the A/D converted 87 into a digital weight signal W. This digital weight signal is then inputted into the CPU 89' and, after its relatively high-frequency vibration components are removed by the digital filter 90, is passed through the first zero-point adjusting means 103. The weight component W(t) corresponding to the weight m of the object X after the zero-point adjustment is then inputted into the weight calculating means 107 of the floor vibration correcting means 102. At the same time, the analog floor vibration signal V outputted from the vibration-detecting cell 84 is amplified by the amplifier 86 and then converted into a digital floor vibration signal by the A/D converter 88. This digital floor vibration signal is inputted into the CPU 89' and, after its relatively high-frequency vibration components are removed by the digital filter 91, is passed through the second zero-point adjusting means 104 to be inputted into the weight calculating means 107 as the floor vibration component V(t) after a zero-point adjustment. The weight calculating means 107 thereupon uses the earlier inputted values of the cell sensitivity ratio κ and the initial load M on the scale cell 83 to perform the calculation according to (21) to output the value of the weight m of the object X. This embodiment is advantageous in that the mass m of a loaded object X can be immediately calculated by a formula by using preliminarily inputted values of the initial load M and the sensitivity ratio κ such that no time-consuming feedback process of ropeating weight sensitivity correction is required. In other words, this embodiment makes it possible to carry out accurate weighing quickly by performing a weight value calculation only once by using preliminarily inputted constant values. Although Fig. 12 shows an example with one scale cell and one vibration-detecting cell, this embodiment too, is applicable equally well to situations with one or more scale cells and a plurality of vibration-detection cells such that the vibration mode of the floor is determined on the basis of the vibration components of the floor detected by the vibration-detection cells to calculate the vertical displacements of the floor at the position of each of the scale cells. The CPUs such as shown in Fig. 2 at 9 and in Fig. 9 at 45, may be provided also with another set of stronger filters with a very low cutoff frequency and a long stabilizing time in addition to ordinary filters. Such filters are highly efficient but do not stabilize within the period of the weighing cycle. For this reason, automatic switches may be further provided such that vibration corrected data will be used as output signals if they participate in combinational calculations continuously but the data filtered through these additional filters will be used as output signals if they do not participate in combinational calculations continuously and the filters are given enough time to stabilize. With reference to Fig. 13, which shows a CPU 9 2 according to a first embodiment of the invention, digital filters (of a first kind) 10 1 -10 m and 11 1 -11 n are adapted to receive digitalized weight signals W 1 -W m and dummy signals D 1 -D n sequentially as explained above through a switching circuit 12, and the vibration components with relatively high frequencies are thereby eliminated. Numeral 115 indicates a correction circuit consisting essentially of a floor vibration calculating means 13 and floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m as explained above with reference to Fig. 2. Numerals 116 1 -116 m indicate a set of filters (of a second kind) characterized as having a relatively low cutoff frequency for eliminating the low-frequency vibration components of the floor, each connected in parallel to corresponding one of the floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m so as to receive the weight signals W 1 -W m and output signals FW 1 ·FW m with the vibration components of the floor removed. Correction control means 120 1 -120 m , individually associated with the floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m , include component detecting means 121 1 -121 m , reference value setting means 122 1 -122 m and comparing means 123 1 -123 m , in addition to the aforementioned digital filters of the second kind 116 1 -116 m . The component detecting means 121 1 -121 m serve to compare the digital weight signals W 1 -W m before they are passed though the digital filters of the second kind 116 1 -116 m and the corrected weight signals FW 1 -FW m after they have passed therethrough to thereby determine the vibration components of the floor. The reference value setting means 122 1 -122 m are for setting and inputting reference values RafH 1 -RefH m for the amplitudes of the vibration components of the floor. The comparing means 123 1 -123 m are for comparing the amplitudes H 1 -H m of the floor vibration components obtained by the component detecting means 121 1 -121 m with the inputted reference values RefH 1 -RefH m . The comparing means 123 1 -123 m is adapted to carry out the comparison operations only during a preset time interval in response to a command signal C 1 outputted from a command means 119. The corrsction control means 120 1 -120 m serve to stop the operations of the floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m in response to stop signals ST 1 -ST m outputted from the comparing means 123 1 -123 m when H 1 ≤ RefH 1 , ... or H m ≤ RefH m , and to operate the floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m in response to correction drive signals DR 1 -DR m from the comparing means 123 1 -123 m when the amplitudes H 1 -H m are respectively greater than the reference values RefH 1 -RefH m . The operations of these component detecting means 121 1 -121 m will be explained next with reference to one of them (121 1 ). The command means 119 is adapted to output the command signal C 1 at a preset time when decision is to be made whether floor vibration correction must be carried out. Such tims may be set some time before the beginning of the daily weighing operation. If the command signal C 1 is received, the associated comparing means 123 1 is activated and outputs a stop signal ST 1 to the correction circuit 115 to atop the operation of the corresponding floor vibration correcting means 14 1 if any, all cr the averaqe of the amplitudes H 1 detected during the specified time la less than the reference value RefH 1 . The CPU 9 2 is also provided with manually operated selection switches 127 1 -127 m for selectably allowing or not allowing the stop and drive signals ST 1 -ST m and DR 1 -DR m from the comparing means 123 1 -123 m of the correction control means 120 1 -120 m to be transmitted to the floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m of the correction circuit 115. In other words, these selection switches 127 1 -127 m allow the user to manually change the mode of control of the correction circuit 115 by the correction control means 120 1 -120 m , in response to the condition of the weighing operations or a change in environmental conditions. For example, the selection switches 127 1 -127 m may be set in ON conditions to allow the stop and drive signals ST 1 -ST m and DR 1 -DR m to pass therethrough but, when it is known that a vibration-causing operation is going to take place, the user may manually set the selection switches 127 1 -127 m in OFF conditions to disallow the signals ST 1 -ST m and DR 1 -DR m to pass therethrough and to atop the operations of the floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m such that the weight signals W 1 -W m from the first digital filters 10 1 -10 m are directly inputted to the combination calculating means 20. As another example, the user can cause the floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m to operate all the time independent of the magnitude of the floor vibrations also by preventing the signals ST 1 -ST m and DR 1 -DR m from passing through the selection switches 127 1 -127 m . In summary, the weight signals W 1 -W m are inputted to the stronger digital filters (of the second kind) 116 1 -116 m which allow the component detecting means 121 1 -121 m to determine the vibration components of the floor. The comparing means 123 1 -123 m of the correction control means 120 1 -120 m compare the amplitudes H 1 -H m of these vibration components with the reference values RefH 1 -RefH m in response to the command signal C 1 from the command means 119 such that the operations of the correction circuit 115 can be stopped, depending on the results of comparison therebetween according to any preset criterion such that the weight signals W 1 -W m are directly inputted to the combination calculating means 20. Thus, if the amplitudes of the floor vibration components are small, errors due to difference in sensitivity between the scale cells 3 1 -3 m and the dummy cells 4 1 -4 n , quantization errors when analog-to-digital conversion is carried out, and weighing errors due to rounding off, for example, can be eliminated by using the weight signals W 1 -W m directly. Fig. 14 shows still another CPU 9 3 , which is similar to the one described above with reference to Fig. 13 and shown at 9 2 therein, being different therefrom firstly in that a single correction control means 120 (instead of the plurality of correction control means 120 1 -120 m of Fig. 13) is connected to the output side of the digital filters 11 1 -11 n so as to receive the digital dummy signals D 1 -D n therefrom and secondly in that this single control correction control means 120 is provided with a single comparing means 123. The single correction control means 120 includes n-number of stronger digital filters (of the second kind) 116 1 -116 n and component detecting means 121 1 -121 n , as do the correction control means 120 1 -120 m of Fig. 13 together, such that the dummy signals D 1 -D n as outputted from the digital filters 11 1 -11 n and the corrected dummy signals FD 1 -FD n after they have passed through the digital filters of the second kind 116 1 -116 n are compared and the vibration components of the floor are thereby determined. The amplitudes H 1 -H n of these vibration components determined by the component detecting means 121 1 -121 n are received by the single comparing means 123, which is activated during a specified period of time (as the comparing means 123 1 -123 m of the correction control means 120 1 -120 m of Fig. 13 are activated by the command signal C 1 as explained above), and compared thereby with a single reference value RefH set inside a reference value setting means 122. The comparing means 123 is programmed to compare the reference value RefH with either the maximum or the minimum of the amplitudes H 1 -H n and output a stop signal ST1 or a drive signal DR1 accordingly, as explained above with reference to Fig. 13. In other respects, the CPU 9 3 shown in Fig. 14 is identical to the CPU 9 2 in Fig. 13, and those components which are identical or equivalent to each other are indicated by the same numerals. It goes without saying that the CPU 9 3 of Fig. 14 may also be provided with a command means as indicated at 119 in Fig. 13 such that the time for activation of the single comparing means 123 can be controlled by outputting a command signal. Fig. 15 shows still another CPU 9 4 , which may be viewed as another variation of the CPU 9 2 shown in Fig. 13, characterized as including peak detecting means of a first kind 130 1 -130 m for detecting peak value P 1 of the digital weight signals W 1 -W m outputted from the scale cells 3 1 -3 m and peak detecting means of a second kind 131 1 -131 m for detecting (second) peak value P 2 of the vibration corrected weight signals BS 1 -BS m outputted from the floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m of the correction circuit 115. There are also included peak value comparing means 135 1 -135 m for using these second peak value P 2 as a reference value and comparing the first peak value P 1 therewith. Neither the digital filters of the second kind 116 1 -116 n nor the command means 119 shown in Fig. 13 find their equivalents in the CPU 9 4 , although a command means may be included such that the peak value comparing means 135 1 -135 m may be activated only during a specified time interval. The peak value comparing means 135 1 -135 m may be programmed to output a stop signal ST1 to the correction circuit 115 to stop the operations of the corresponding floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m if any of the (first) peak values P 1 detected during a predetermined tine interval is less than the reference peak value P 2 ("minimum" condition), if all of such first peak values P 1 are less than the reference value P 2 ("maximum" condition), or if the average of them is less than the reference value P 2 . The advantage of this CPU 9 4 is that the operation of any of the floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m is stopped if its corresponding first peak value P 1 is less (whether in the sense of "minimum", "maximum" or average as explained above) than a predetermined reference value (represented by the second peak value P 2 ) so as to reduce the errors which may be generated due to vibration corrections. In other respects, Fig. 15 is identical to Fig. 13 and those components which are identical or equivalent to each other are indicated by the same numerals. Fig. 16 shows still another CPU 95 adapted to stop or continue the operations of its correction circuit 115, depending on the magnitudes of the amplitudes of the dummy signals D 1 -D n . As shown in Fig. 16, digital filters of the second kind 116 1 -116 n are adapted to receive the dummy signals D 1 -D n , to remove therefrom the vibration components of the floor and to thereby output vibration corrected DC dummy signals FD 1 -FD n to zero point adjusting means 142 1 -142 n of zero point adjusting setting units 141 1 -141 n . These inputted signals FD 1 -FD n are stored in memory devices (MEM) 143 1 -143 n as zero points, and zero point signals Rz 1 -Rz n indicative of the zero points are outputted from zero point outputting means 144 1 -144 n . There is a zero point adjustment command means 147 adapted to output a command signal C 2 at a preset timing during a weighing operation, say, every 30 minutes. When the zero point adjusting means 142 1 -142 n raceive the command signal C 2 , they accept the DC dummy signals FD 1 -FD n for a predetermined length of time such as 10 seconds, thereby adjusting the zero points on the basis of these signals FD 1 -FD n , say, from their average values. If zero points are already known, a simple means for outputting a zero point may be used in place of the zero point adjusting setting units 141 1 -141 n . The dummy signals D 1 -D n are also inputted into amplitude detecting means 145 1 -145 n , which are adapted to detect the amplitudes H 1 -H n of the dummy signals D 1 -D n on the basis of the differences between the dummy signals D 1 -D n and the zero point signals Rz 1 -Rz n received from the zero point outputting means 144 1 -144 n . The amplitudes H 1 -H n thus detected by the amplitude detecting means 145 1 -145 n are received by a comparing means 123 and compared thereby with a reference amplitude value RefH set in a reference value setting means 122. The comparing means 123 outputs a atop signal ST to the correction circuit 115 if any of the detected amplitudes H 1 -H n is smaller than the reference amplitude value RefH (minimum condition), if all of the detected amplitudes H 1 -H n are smaller than the reference amplitude value RefH (maximum condition), or if the average of the detected amplitudes H 1 -H n is smaller than the reference amplitude value RefH. Fig. 17 shows still another CPU 9 6 adapted to stop or continue the operations of its correction circuit 115, but depending on the magnitudes of the amplitudes of the digital weight signals W 1 -W m outputted from the scale cells 3 1 -3 m , rather than of the dummy signals D 1 -D n , and provided with a plurality of correction control means 120 1 -120 m corresponding individually to the m-number of load sensors 1 1 -1 m (Fig. 1). The zero point adjustment command means 147 is adapted to output a command signal C 2 at preset times when the scale cells 3 1 -3 m are in unloaded conditions such as every morning before the daily weighing operation is started. When the command signal C 2 is received, zero point adjusting setting units 141 1 -141 m , individually corresponding to the load sensors 1 1 -1 m , are activated for a specified length of time, during which digital weight signals W 1 -W m , while the load sensors 1 1 -1 m are in unloaded conditions, are passed through strong digital filters of the second kind 116 1 -116 m and corrected DC weight signals FW 1 -FW m are received by zero point adjusting means 142 1 -142 n . Zero points are thereby determined, say, from the average of these weight signals W 1 -W m , and stored in memory devices (MEM) 143 1 -143 m . Zero point outputting means 144 1 -144 m serve to output zero point signals Rzz 1 -Rzz m indicative of these zero points when weight signals W 1 -W m are outputted subsequently when the load sensors 1 1 -1 m are in loaded conditions. In situations where zero points are already known, a simple means for outputting a zero point may be used in place of zero point adjusting setting units 141 1 -141 m , as explained above with reference to Fig. 16. Amplitude detecting means 145 1 -145 m are adapted to detect the amplitudes H 1 -H m of the weight signals W 1 -W m on the basis of the differences between the weight signals W 1 -W m under the no-load conditions and the zero point signals Rzz 1 -Rzz m received from zero point outputting means 144 1 -144 m . The amplitudes H 1 -H m thus detected by the amplitude detecting means 145 1 -145 m are received by comparing means 123 1 -123 m and compared thereby with reference amplitude values RefH 1 -RefH m set in reference value setting means 122 1 -122 m . The comparing means 123 1 -123 m output stop signals ST 1 -ST m to the correction circuit 115 in the same manner as explained above with reference to Fig. 13. Throughout herein, it is to be understood that only representative embodiments are being described. Many of the features can be mixed or interchanged. In the CPU 9 5 shown in Fig. 16, for example, a plurality of correction control means corresponding individually to the n-number of dummy cells 4 1 -4 n may be provided as shown in Fig. 17. In the CPU 9 6 shown in Fig. 17, as another example, a single correction control means may be provided in common for all load sensors 1 1 -1 m (Fig. 1). Although the correction circuit 115, in all of the embodiments described above, is controlled by correction control means 120 for detecting vibration components contained in weight signals W 1 -W m or dummy signals D 1 -D n , displacement signals S 1 -S m representing the vertical motion of the floor may be used to determine whether floor vibration corrections are necessary or not, as shown in Fig. 18. Fig. 18 shows such a CPU 9 7 . The CPU 9 7 according to this embodiment includes a floor vibration calculating means 13 adapted to calculate the vibration mode of the floor from the vibration components of the dummy signals D 1 -D n and to output displacement signals S 1 -S m indicative of the vertical displacaments of the floor at the positions of the scale cells 3 1 -3 m . The CPU 9 7 also includes m-number of comparing means 123 1 -123 m corresponding to the m-number of scale cells 3 1 -3 m . These comparing means 123 1 -123 m are adapted to receive the displacement signals S 1 -S m outputted from the floor vibration calculating means 13 and to compare them with reference values RefS 1 ·RetS m stored in reference value setting means 122 1 -122 m , outputting stop signals ST 1 -ST m to the floor vibration correcting means 14 1 -14 m if the level of the displacement signals S 1 -S m is lower than that of the reference values RefS 1 -RefS m and drive signals DR 1 -DR m if other wise. With the CPU 9 7 thus formed, the floor vibration calculating means 13 can calculate the effects of floor vibrations on the scale cells 3 1 -J m accurately even where the dummy signals D 1 -D n outputted from the dummy cells 4 1 -4 m do not accurately represent the effacts of the floor vibrations on the scale cells 3 1 -3 m because, for example, the scale and dummy cells 3 1 -3 m , 4 1 -4 m are positioned differently. In other words, the CPU 9 7 as shown in Fig. 18 can stop and activate the correction circuit 115 more appropriately according to the motion of the individual scale cells 3 1 -3 m . The invention was described above with reference to embodiments adapted to correct weight signals from individual scale cells on the basis of outputs from dummy cells, but such dummy cells may be in the form of a simple vibration detector placed near each of the scale cells. In such a case, the correcting circuit may be of a simple structure merely for the purpose of subtracting the vibration component from the weight signal. It is also to be noted that the manually operable selection switches 127 1 -127 m may be replaced by automatic switches adapted to function periodically or the correction control means 120 may be additionally adapted to control the operation of the correction circuit 115.

Claims: A weighing machine comprising: a scale cell for weighing an object and outputting a weight signal indicative of a measured weight value of said object; a vibration-detecting cell set on a same floor as said scale cell for outputting a floor vibration signal indicative of the vibration of said floor; correcting means (14) for correcting said weight signal on the basis of said floor vibration signal outputted from said vibration-detecting cell and thereby generating a vibration corrected signal indicative of a corrected weight value of said object not containing effects of said vibration of said floor; and correction control means (120) for detecting vibration components of said floor and stopping operations of said correcting means by comparing said vibration components with a reference value. The weighing machine of claim 1, wherein said correction control means includes: a filter which is connected to said scale cell in parallel with said correcting means so as to receive said weight signal from said scale cell; and vibration component detecting means for comparing said weight signal before and after passing through said filter and thereby detecting vibration components of said floor; said weighing machine further comprising command means for causing a comparison to be made between said vibration components and said reference value during a preset comparison time interval. The weighing machine of claim 1, wherein said correction control means includes: a filter which is connected to said vibration-detecting cell in parallel with said correcting means so as to receive said floor vibration signal from said vibration detecting cell; and vibration component detecting means for comparing said weight signal before and after passing through said filter and thereby detecting vibration components of said floor; said weighing machine further comprising command means for causing a comparison to be made between said vibration components and said reference value during a preset comparison time interval. The weighing machine of claim 1, further comprising: first peak detecting means for detecting peaks in said weight signal from said scale cell; and second peak detecting means for detecting peaks in a vibration-corrected signal outputted from said correcting means; said correction control means including peak comparing means for using a peak detected by said second peak detecting means as said reference value and comparing a peak detected by said first peak detecting means with said reference value. The weighing machine of claim 1, wherein said correction control means includes: zero-point adjusting means for operating during a specified zero-point adjusting time interval, storing a zero-point level indicated by a zero-point signal obtained by removing said vibration components from said weight signal, and thereby outputting a zero-point signal indicative of said zero-point level; and amplitude detecting means for detecting the amplitude of said floor vibration signal from the difference between said floor vibration signal and said zero-point signal. The weighing machine of claim 1, wherein said correction control means includes: zero-point adjusting means for operating during a specified zero-point adjusting time interval, storing a zero-point level indicated by a zero-point signal obtained by removing said vibration components from a no-load weight signal outputted from said scale cell when no load is being applied thereto from any object, and thereby outputting a zero-point signal indicative of said zero-point level; and amplitude detecting means for detecting the amplitude of said no-load weight signal from the difference between said no-load weight signal and said zero-point signal. The weighing machine of claim 1, wherein said vibration-detecting cell is one of a plurality of similar vibration-detecting cells and said correcting means include: vibrating calculating means for detecting vibration modes of said floor from vibration components of floor vibration signals outputted from said plurality of vibration-detecting cells and thereby calculating vertical displacement of said floor at the position of said scale cell; and vibration correcting means for generating a vibration-corrected signal by removing said vibration components from said weight signal by using said vertical displacement; said correction control means including comparing means for comparing said vertical displacement calculated by said vibration calculating means with said reference value.

Inventors: NAITO KAZUFUMI, NAKAMURA YOSHIHIRO, TAJIRI SHOKO, TOKUMARU HIDEKATSU, WAKASA YUKIO, NAITO, KAZUFUMI, NAKAMURA, YOSHIHIRO, TAJIRI, SHOKO, TOKUMARU, HIDEKATSU, WAKASA, YUKIO, NAITO, KAZUFUMI, ISHIDA CO., LTD., NAKAMURA, YOSHIHIRO, ISHIDA CO., LTD., Tajiri, Shoko, Ishida Co., Ltd., Tokumaru, Hidekatsu, Ishida Co., Ltd., WAKASA, YUKIO, ISHIDA CO., LTD.
Applicants: ISHIDA SEISAKUSHO, ISHIDA CO., LTD.
Application year: 1994
Main classification: G01G23
IPC codes: G01G19, G01G23, G01G3