SUPPLEMENTATION OF PROTEIN DIETS WITH DI- AND TRIPEPTIDES

Abstract: Improved animal diets for oral administration are provided which include a quantity of non-hydrolyzed, non-digested, naturally occurring protein supplemented with a minor amount of an additive selected from the group consisting of di- and tripeptides including an essential amino acid residue. The diets commonly include at least about 8 % by weight of such intact protein, which may be derived from typical plant or animal sources. The preferred additive includes an essential amino acid residue selected from the group consisting of lysine, methionine, threonine, tryptophan, isoleucine and valine. Use of the di- and tripeptide additives of the invention gives increased nitrogen use by the animal, as compared with feeding of the amino acid constituents of the additives.

Description: SUPPLEMENTATION OF PROTEIN DIETS WITH DI- AND TRIPEPTIDES Background of the Invention 1. Field of the Invention The present invention is broadly concerned with improved diets for oral administration comprising intact, non-hydrolyzed, non-digested, naturally occurring pro- tein(s) supplemented with a minor amount of an additive selected from the group consisting of di- and tripeptides having at least one essential amino acid residue. More particularly, it is concerned with such diets, and corresponding feeding methods, wherein the presence of di- or tripeptide additive results in greater utilization of amino acid nitrogen by the animal, allowing corresponding reductions in the protein content of the diets. 2. - Description of the Prior Art Presently, most essential amino acids supplied by animal diets are derived from naturally occurring plant or animal proteins. It is known, however, to supplement normal diets with various free amino acids such as lysine from lysineΗCl, DL-methionine, L-tryptophan, L-isoleucine and L-threonine. The theory of such supplementation is that the free amino acids are thought to be absorbed by an animal more readily than more complex peptides and pro¬ teins. For example, the addition of lysine«HC1 to a ton of swine finishing feed allows the dietary protein content to be reduced from 14% to 12%, by replacing 100 pounds of soybean meal with 97 pounds of corn and 3 pounds of lysine«HC1. Peptides can be produced by enzymatic digestion of protein with proteinases or peptidases. Typically, the digestive process involves the enzymatic degradation of dietary proteins to free amino acids or peptides of varying chain lengths. Research has been conducted in the past to evaluate the nutritional value of dietary peptide supplements in the form of protein hydrolysate peptides, which are a mixture of many amino acids found in proteins prior to hydrolysis thereof. Such experiments have been carried out in many species, including man and rodents. Additionally, studies have been carried out in many species to evaluate the absorptive potential and mechanism of utilization for amino acids and peptides, including man, rodents, fowl, ruminants, and several aquatic spe- cies. These studies involve infusion of peptides into the digestive system of the test species, or in vitro diges¬ tive investigations. Summary of the Invention The present invention pertains to new animal diets designed for oral administration (feeding) supple¬ mented with a minor amount of an additive selected from the group consisting of di- and tripeptides having at least one essential amino acid residue (i.e., a residue of methionine, arginine, threonine, tryptophan, histidine, isoleucine, lysine, leucine, valine or phenylalanine) . The diets of the invention include a quantity of non- hydrolyzed, non-digested, naturally occurring proteins, such as those typically derived from plant and animal sources. In addition, the di- and tripeptides do not compete for the same transport mechanism as the free amino acid constituents thereof. Accordingly, use of the additives of the invention permits better utilization of nitrogen by the animal, thereby allowing concomitant reduction in more expensive naturally occurring protein sources in the diets. In more detail, the preferred additive of the invention is a di- or tripeptide containing an essential amino acid residue selected from the group consisting of lysine, methionine, threonine, tryptophan, isoleucine and valine. The additives may be in the free form, or more usually in salt form. Generally, the additive is present in a given diet at a level of from about 0.001-5% by weight, and more preferably from about 0.01-1% by weight. The protein forming a part of the diets of the invention can be taken from a wide variety of sources, but typically plant protein is present. Such plant protein may be derived from a cereal grain, e.g., corn, soybean, wheat, sorghum, oat and barley. Additionally, the protein can be wholly or partially derived from animal sources such as meat, blood meal or bone meal. The total protein content of the diets is generally at least about 8% by weight, and more preferably from about 12-50% by weight. Of course, the precise protein content utilized, as well as other nutritionally useful ingredients (e.g., soybean oil or whey) depends upon the animal being fed. The diets hereof may be formulated for a wide variety of animals, e.g., swine, poultry, ruminants and fish. Human diets can also be supplemented using the additives of the invention. Normally, the diets hereof are fed on an ad libitum basis, but those skilled in the art will recognize that this is not a prerequisite. It is only necessary that a given feed containing non-hydrolyzed, non-digested, naturally occurring protein and be supplemented with a di- or tripeptide as defined above. Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments The following example describes a swine feeding test using a preferred dipeptide in accordance with the invention, namely L-lysyl-glycine«HCl, in the context of supplementation of an otherwise normal corn-soybean meal swine diet. The dipeptide-supplemented diet is compared with a control, and a diet containing lysineΗC1, and the results of the test demonstrate that the dipeptide-supple¬ mented diet gave more efficient nitrogen utilization. It is to be understood that this example is provided by way of illustration only, and nothing therein is to be taken as an overall limitation upon the scope of the invention. EXAMPLE A trial of 180 (21 ± 2 days of age) pigs was used in a growth assay to compare the effects of supple¬ menting the pigs' diet with L-lysine«HCl, 98% (78.5% lysine) , and the dipeptide L-lysyl-glycine«HCl (approxi¬ mately 50% lysine) on starter pig performance and nitrogen utilization. Pigs were blocked (n=5) by initial weight (6.3 kg) and assigned to treatments according to ancestry and sex. Feed and water were available ad libitum for 21 days post-weaning (11.7 kg final weight) ' The control diets were formulated to include 0.9% and 1.1% lysine respectively, using a corn-soybean meal mixture containing 15% edible grade dried whey. Synthetic lysine«HC1 and the dipeptide lysyl-glycine were added to the control diets to form test diets containing 1.0% and 1.1% lysine and lysyl- glycine respectively. The following table sets forth each of the six diets used in this study. Table 1 Composition of Experimental Diets ( as-fed ) Corn-Soybean Meal Supplement Source: Control Diet Lysine-HCl Lysyl-glyci Item Lysine, % .90 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.1 Corn 56.03 49.23 56.03 56.03 56.03 56. Soybean meal, 48% 19.83 26.79 19.83 19.83 19.83 19. Dried whey 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15. Soybean oil 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.0 Monocalcium phosphate 1.91 1.79 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.9 Limestone .80 .77 .80 .80 .80 .8 Salt .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .3 Premix Vitamins .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .2 Trace minerals .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .1 Selenium .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .0 Apramycin 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 Copper sulfate .08 .08 .08 .08 .08 .0 Supplements Dl-methionine, 99% .05 .01 .05 .05 .05 .0 L-threonine .04 — .04 .04 .04 .0 L-lysineΗCl, 98% — — .13 .25 — L-lysyl-glycine — __ __ .20 .4 Glycine .20 __ .20 .20 .10 Corn starch .31 .58 .18 .06 .21 .1 Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100. Results of growth performance from 0-21 days post-weaning are set forth in Table 2 below. Serum samples were obtained on days 7, 14, and 21 for analysis of urea nitrogen. Data were analyzed as a randomized com¬ plete block design and means were separated using Bonferroni pared t-tests. Single df contrasts were used to evaluate differences between the two lysine sources and levels. No differences in daily gain or daily feed intake were observed between treatments. In general, pigs consuming the 1.1% lysine corn-soybean meal control diet had higher urea nitrogen than the pigs consuming the reduced protein diets and those consuming the 1.1% lysine, lysyl-glycine supplemented diet had the lowest urea nitrogen. Pigs consuming the diets containing lysyl- glycine had lower urea nitrogen levels than pigs fed the lysine«HC1 diets on day 21. In summary, differences in growth were not observed between the dietary lysine sources or levels; however, amino acids appeared to be more efficiently utilized when supplied from the dipeptide lysyl-glycine rather than lysine«HC1, as evidenced by the lower serum urea nitrogen levels on day 21. Table 2 Corn-Soybean Control Diets Lysine HCl Lysyl-glycine Lysine, %: .9 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 SE Daily gain, g 248 270 276 253 218 280 16 Daily feed, g 417 418 460 413 395 432 18 Gain/feed 593* 646* 600* 613* 547* 643 y 16 d 7 urea N, mg/dl 11.0* 14.0" 9.5 1 9.2 1 9.7* 8.5 1 .7 d 14 urea N, mg/dl 12.5 y 13.β 5 ' 9.6 1 8.4" 8.9 1 8.6 1 .6 d 21 urea N, mg/dl* 12.3* 13.0" 10.7^ 8.5* 9.1* 7.9 Z .5 • Contrast of lysine « HC1 vs. lysyl-glycine (P=0.05) "*Means within a row lacking a common superscript letter differ (P<0.05)

Claims: Claims : 1. A diet for oral administration comprising a quantity of non-hydrolyzed, non-digested, naturally occurring protein supplemented with a minor amount of an 5 additive selected from the group consisting of di- and tripeptides having an essential amino acid residue. 2. The diet of claim 1, where said essential amino acid residue is selected from the group consisting 10 of lysine, methionine, threonine, tryptophan, isoleucine and valine. 3. The diet of claim 1, said additive being present in the diet at a level of from about 0.001-5% by 15 weight. 4. The diet of claim 3, said level being from about 0.01-1% by weight. 20 5. The diet of claim 1, at least a portion of said protein being derived from a plant source. 6. The diet of claim 5, said" plant source being a cereal grain. 25 7. The diet of claim 6, said cereal grain being selected from the group consisting of corn, soybean, wheat, sorghum, oat and barley. 30 8. The diet of claim 1, said diet being formulated for an animal selected from the group consist¬ ing of swine, poultry, ruminants, and fish. 9. The diet of claim 1, said diet having a I 35 protein content of at least about 8% by weight. 10. The diet of claim 9, said protein content being from about 12-50% by weight. 11. In a method of feeding an animal including the steps of feeding to the animal a diet including an amount of non-hydrolyzed, non-digested, naturally occur¬ ring protein, the improvement which comprises supplement¬ ing said diet with an additive selected from the group consisting of di- and tripeptides having an essential amino acid residue. 12. The method of claim 11, where said essen¬ tial amino acid residue is selected from the group con¬ sisting of lysine, methionine, threonine, tryptophan, isoleucine and valine. 13. The method of claim 11, where another of the amino acid residues of said additive is selected from the group consisting of methionine, threonine, tryptophan and valine. 14. The method of claim 13, said additive being present in the method at a level of from about 0.001-5% by weight. 15. The method of claim 14, said level being from about 0.01-1% by weight. 16. The method of claim 11, at least a portion of said protein being derived from a plant source. 17. The method of claim 16, said plant source being a cereal grain. 18. The method of claim 17, said cereal grain being selected from the group consisting of corn, soybean, wheat, sorghum, oat and barley. 19. The method of claim 11, said method being formulated for an animal selected from the group consist¬ ing of swine, poultry, ruminants, and fish. 20. The method of claim 11, said method having a protein content of at least about 8% by weight. 21. The method of claim 20, said protein content being from about 12-50% by weight.

Inventors: BLUM STEPHEN A, GOODBAND ROBERT L, HANSEN JEFFREY A, NELSSEN JIM L, TOKACH MIKE D, BLUM, STEPHEN, A., GOODBAND, ROBERT, D., HANSEN, JEFFREY, A., NELSSEN, JIM, L., TOKACH, MIKE, D.
Applicants: BLUM STEPHEN A, GOODBAND ROBERT D, HANSEN JEFFREY A, NELSSEN JIM L, TOKACH MIKE D, UNIV KANSAS STATE, BLUM, STEPHEN, A., GOODBAND, ROBERT, D., HANSEN, JEFFREY, A., KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, NELSSEN, JIM, L., TOKACH, MIKE, D.
Application year: 1994
Main classification: A23K1
IPC codes: A23K1