Image display device with backlighting

Abstract: An image display device based on liquid crystal panels is arranged for outputting a high quality image, specifically one in which the problem of the shadow border between pixels has been remedied. Embodiments of the display device employ various techniques to address the problem. One solution, a multi-pixelating technique, surrounds pixels with virtual images of pixel, where both the spacing and the range of the multi-pixelating are precisely controllable. In other solution, the divergence of the light incident upon the liquid crystal panel is carefully controlled. or the light field emerging from the liquid crystal panel is modulated, in order to project a carefully controlled pixel image intensity distribution onto a diffusely scattering surface. The techniques developed are applicable to color liquid crystal panels as well, and can be employed to perform a precisely interpolated color mixing of neighboring pixels. Some of the embodiments employ a specially designed lighting unit for providing white parallel rays to the liquid crystal device. Because of advantages in areas of size, weight and image quality, the display device is particularly suitable to head mounted displays.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an image display device for outputting a high-quality image. The device has a display unit, which may be a liquid crystal display unit. 2. Description of the Related Art Herein, three representative related arts to the present invention will be described. A typical liquid crystal display unit provides a far lower image quality if a user watches the display closely or magnifies the image with a lens. This is because an opaque boundary exists between adjacent pixels so that these pixels are seen as spatially separated luminous points. In particular, in the case of a display unit for the color display, disadvantageously, the color dots which constitute a single mixed color pixel are viewed as separate and distinct from each other. To cope with this disadvantage, a technique has been proposed in Japanese Lying Open No. 59-36282 or PCT/WO/92/16075. The first related art concerns the display unit arranged according to the technique as shown in Fig.16. As shown, the display unit is arranged to have a diffuse backlighting unit 1201, a liquid crystal display 1202, and a light scattering plate 1203. In operation, diffuse rays of light emitted from the backlighting unit 1201 pass through the liquid crystal display 1202 and reach the light scattering plate 1203 where they are scattered. As a result, the image 1205 of a pixel 1204 is expanded on the light scattering plate 1203 so that the shadow region surrounding the pixel will be filled in. Further, in the case of a color display unit, this pixel expansion overlaps adjacent pixels of differing primary colors resulting in a mixed-color image, improving image quality. As mentioned above, the light scattering plate located just before the display makes it possible to eliminate the space between the pixels. The intensity distribution 1211 of the magnified pixel image 1205 is formed to spread wide as shown in Fig. 17, This brings about a disadvantageous side effect, namely making the edges in the image vague. Because edge detection is important for image comprehension, this blurring of edges can lead directly to eye fatigue. The lack of control mechanisms for setting the size, as well as other parameter values of the pixel's expanded image prevent the remedying of these size effects. This description will now be oriented to the second related art. Display units such as liquid crystal displays entail a provision for blocking the transmission of light in the area between adjacent pixels, these areas corresponding to electrode wires. In the case where the image is magnified when it is displayed, these areas are conspicuous. At first, a monochrome liquid crystal display unit having such an arrangement will be discussed with reference to Fig. 22. A liquid crystal display panel 1150 is arranged so that pixels are discretely distributed with an opaque area between adjacent pixels. If the image is magnified when it is displayed, the pixel images are spatially separated and the opaque portion will be conspicuous, thereby lowering the image quality. To overcome this shortcoming, the monochrome display unit of the related art is arranged with light diffusing plate 1151 set after the liquid crystal display panel 1150 for spreading the images of the pixels 1153. Those magnified pixels form a vague image, making the borders between the adjacent pixels less distinguishable from a viewpoint of a user. Next, the color-mixing type display unit having a liquid crystal display will be discussed as a second type related art, with reference to Figs. 18 to 22, in which Fig. 18 shows a delta type pixel distribution, Fig.19 shows a four-pixel distribution, Fig.20 shows a stripe type pixel distribution, Fig. 21 shows a diagonal type distribution, and Fig. 22 shows a color-mixing type display unit of the related art. Liquid crystal color display having red, green and blue pixels, have pixel distributions of either a delta distribution shown in Fig. 18, a four-pixel distribution shown in Fig. 19, a stripe distribution shown in Fig.20, or a diagonal distribution shown in Fig. 21. In these cases, if a user watches the display from a distance, the three primary colors are optically integrated because of limits of human visual acuity. If, however, the image is magnified when displayed, the three primary colors of the pixels are visually distinguishable from one another, thereby greatly lowering the image quality. To cope with this shortcoming, a technique has been proposed to locate the diffusing plate 1151 as shown in Fig.22 after the color display panel 1150 so as to visually make each pixel less distinguishable. The ray of light emitted from the pixels 1152 on the display 1150 are diffused through the diffusing plate 1151. Hence, the image 1153 of each pixel on the diffusing plate 1151 is spread so that the pixel images overlap each other, realizing color mixture on the display. Next, a color-mixing type display unit will be discussed as a third kind of the second related art with reference to Fig. 23. As shown, three differing primary color Pixels 1161, 1162, 1163 which are intended to be color-mixed are together enclosed by physical barriers 1164, 1165, 1166, and 1167. The physical barriers restrict the color-mixing to each mutually confined three color pixel triplet. The colors are mixed through the diffusing plate 1168 and appear as a mixed-color pixel 1169 on its surface. In display application, there has been heretofore proposed a head-mounted type display (HMD) as shown in Fig. 24. If a display panel 1172 illuminated from a backlighting 1171 located in the helmet type frame is magnified through the effect of a lens 1173, its image will expand to cover with a large field of view. The mounting of the HMD to the head requires that it be small and light. To meet this requirement, it is desirable that the display panel 1172 be a liquid crystal display and the backlighting unit 1171 be a luminescent lamp. However, with the first type of the second related art the diffusion characteristics of the diffusion plate are difficult to contract with precision, and it is difficult to obtain a desirable pixel image intensity distribution on the surface of the diffusing plate. Further, the second type of the second related art has the similar problem to the above when mixing colors with each other. The high-frequency components of the spatial frequency are lost from the overall image and the image content of the display is disadvantageously made vague. Moreover, the third type of the second related art, which having the advantage of maintaining high-frequency components of a spatial frequency of the overall image even when the colors are mixed, requires technically challenging physical barriers to guide the rays of light. This type of the related art offers no control over varying the pixel's intensity distribution and thereby provided a limited improvement with only limited allowance in designing the LCD display. This type of the related art provides no function for smoothing the borders between the pixels though the color mixture is realized. Finally, fabrication of the physical barriers for guiding the rays of light is too costly. Next, the description will be oriented to a third related art which concerns a liquid crystal display having three kinds of pixels, red, green and blue pixels on one display with reference to Figs. 18 to 21 and 25. As mentioned above with respect to the second related art, Fig.17 shows the delta pixel distribution. Fig.19 shows the four-pixel distribution, Fig.20 shows the stripe pixel distribution. Fig.18, shows the diagonal pixel distribution. Fig.25 shows a related art involving color mixing. A liquid crystal color display having red, green and blue pixels on a single display can employ the delta pixel distribution shown in Fig. 18, the four-pixel distribution shown in Fig. 19, the stripe pixel distribution shown in Fig.20, or the diagonal distribution shown in Fig. 21. In all cases, if the user watches the display from a distance, the three primary colors are optically integrated because of limits in human visual acuity. If, however, the display is magnified such as when viewed through a lens, the three primary colors of the pixels are visually separated from one another, thereby greatly lowering the image quality. To cope with this shortcoming, a color-mixing system has been studied which mixes the pixel colors so that the color pixels are not perceived to be visually separated. As an example of this system, as shown in Fig.25, a diffusing plate 1082 is provided after a panel 1081 for visually making the pixels less distinguishable. Since a backlight 1080 emits diffuse light to the panel 1081 for illuminating the panel, the ray of light emitted from the pixels 1083 on the panel 1081 form image 1084 of magnified pixels. As such, these pixel images overlap with one another, mixing the colors on the display. The third related art provides no capability for controlling the divergence of the diffused ray emitted from the backlight unit 1080, so that the rays may spread widely. Shortening the distance from the panel 1081 to the diffusing plate 1082 would result in a narrower and more desirable spread of the pixel's image 1084, however the necessary thickness of the glass superstrate of the liquid crystal panel restricts the shortening of this distance to a length that results in an undesirably wide pixel image spread. Limitations on the range of spread of diffusion with available diffusion plates prevent the diffusion plate 1082 from being able to compensate for the excess divergence of the pixel image in the third related art. EP-A-0509630 discloses a color display device using light valves, such as an active matrix LCD having an array of individually controllable pixels. The appearance of the disjointed colored (R,G,B) spots instead of mixed colors and dead spaces between adjacent pixels in a magnified image display is inhibited by using lens arrays for multiplying and superimposing the pixel images. In FR-A-2611389 a display device employs a birefringment element for creating and superimposing two images of a pixel array. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to provide an image displaying device which is arranged to have a less costly display unit for offering high image quality and a high degree of freedom in optimizing the display. It is another object of the present invention to provide an image display device which is arranged to prevent the image content of the display from being smeared and to have a less costly color-mixing display unit for offering high image quality and greater freedom in designing the characteristics of the display. In carrying out the objects, according to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided an image display device having a display unit for displaying an image and a micro lens array, which is arranged in parallel with a display surface of the display unit, and by which input pixels displayed on said display unit are visually increased in number when said pixels are output by said micro lens array, characterized in that said micro lens array comprises lenses arranged in a delta distribution. The microlens array may comprise hexagonal lenses. According to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided an image display device having a display unit for displaying an image and a micro lens array which is arranged in parallel with a display surface of the display unit and by which input pixels displayed on said display unit are visually increased in number when said pixels are output by said micro lens array, characterized in that said micro lens array forms part of a mixed element which also includes a diffuser. Further, it is preferable to provide a magnifying means for visually magnifying the image. It is further preferable to provide a pair of the image displays arranged so that a user may obscure a different display with each image. The display unit is preferably a liquid crystal display unit, Light rays applied thereto from a lighting means are selectively passed through the liquid crystal display unit according to the image to be displayed. Since a micro lens array is úsed as the pixel multiplying means, control of design is enabled to provide optimal output of the liquid crystal display in accordance with the pixel pitch and the pixel distribution of the liquid crystal display. In this designed optimal output, the gap between the pixels is effectively filled so as to allow the image to appear continuous. For a color display, the colors are mixed so that the image quality is kept high even if the image is magnified, and the causes of user eye strain are greatly suppressed. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 is a view showing an head-mounting type display to which an image display device applies according to a first embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 2 is a view for explaining the effect of a micro lens array included in the image display device according to the first embodiment; Fig. 3 is an explanatory view showing a first effect of the micro lens array; Fig. 4 is an explanatory view showing a second effect of the micro lens array; Fig. 5 is a flowchart showing a procedure for designing the micro lens array; Fig. 6 is an explanatory view showing a liquid crystal display composed of pixels disposed in a stripe manner; Fig. 7 is a view showing a design of an interference image produced by the micro lens array; Fig. 8 is an explanatory view showing the range in which an interference image takes place; Fig. 9 is a flowchart showing a procedure for designing a micro lens array if the micro lens array has different parameters in the horizontal and the vertical directions; Fig. 10 is a view showing a design for an interference image appearing on the liquid crystal display composed of pixels disposed in a stripe manner; Fig. 11 is an explanatory view showing a micro lens array disposed in a delta manner in accordance with one aspect of the invention; Fig. 12 is an explanatory view showing a liquid crystal display composed of pixels disposed in a delta manner; Fig. 13 is an explanatory view showing an interference image produced by the micro lens array disposed in a delta manner; Fig. 14 is an explanatory view showing a design for an interference image produced by the micro lens array disposed in a delta manner; Fig. 15 is a side view showing a liquid crystal display included in the image display device, in which a microlens array is installed within a surface glass; Fig. 16 is a diagram showing an image display device according to a related art of the present invention; Fig. 17 is a graph showing a luminance distribution of a pixel image produced by a light scattering plate and a micro lens array; Fig. 18 is a view showing delta distribution of pixels; Fig. 19 is a view showing four-pixel distribution of pixels; Fig. 20 is a view showing stripe distribution of pixels; Fig. 21 is a view showing diagonal distribution of pixels; Fig. 22 is an explanatory view showing a display unit according to another related art of the present invention; Fig. 23 is an explanatory view showing a display unit according to another related art of the present invention; Fig. 24 is a view showing a head mounted type display (HMD) according to another related art of the present invention; and Fig. 25 is an explanatory view showing a method for mixing colors according to another related art of the present invention. Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described hereafter with reference to the appended drawings. In Fig. 1, a head mounted type display (HMD) according to this embodiment is arranged to have an eyeglasses type case 1, a backlight unit 2, a liquid crystal display 3, a micro lens array 4, and a lens 5. As shown, the overall device is housed in the eyeglasses type case 1 so that it may be fitted to the head of a user 6 when it is used. The part corresponding to the lens of the eyeglasses is arranged to have a backlight unit 2, a liquid crystal display 3, a micro lens array 4, and a lens 5 located in sequence from the outside. The user views a magnified image when the device is fitted to his or her head. In such an arrangement, if the lens operates to magnify the image, the pixels forming the image to be displayed are not visually separated on the screen. Further, for the color display, the color pixels are not visually separated. A high-quality image results even though the image has been magnified. The micro lens array 4 is an optical element manufactured as a planar array of minute lenses. The lenses are disposed at the same pitch as the pixel pitch of the display or at a smaller one. An image pattern as shown in Fig. 2 is displayed on the liquid crystal display through the micro lens array. The function of the micro lens array will be discussed with reference to Fig. 2. In Fig. 2, a numeral 21 denotes a liquid crystal display. A numeral 22 denotes a micro lens array. A numeral 23 denotes pixels to be addressed. A numeral 24 denotes an image formed of pixels by the micro lens array. The characteristic function of the micro lens array is based on the effect that reproduced image of the pixels appears discretely on the periphery of each pixel. This function makes it possible to eliminate the shadow space between adjacent pixels and form the luminance distribution of the pixel image like a square 1213 as shown in Fig. 17. The resulting image, therefore, keeps acute edges, eye strain to the user. Moreover, by properly designing a focal distance, a pitch, a distribution, a form of the micro lens array 4 and a distance between the micro lens array and the panel, it is possible to control the interval between each pixel in the reproduced image, the number of reproduced image pixels, and the range about each pixel where image pixels are reproduced. The micro lens array has the two functions indicated below. As a first function, an effect is provided of sporadically reproducing image pixels around each pixel for virtually increasing the number of pixels. As a second function, another effect is provided of defining the area wherein the reproduced image pixels of each pixel appear. Another advantageous feature, is that the micro lens array does not need precise positioning with regard to the pixels of the liquid crystal display. At first, the first effect will be discussed. Assume that an optical system of the head mounted type display (HMD) 1 is modeled as shown in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3, a numeral 31 denotes a liquid crystal display. A numeral 32 denotes a micro lens array. A numeral 33 denotes the real plane of the liquid crystal display, formed through the effect of the micro lens array. A numeral 34 denotes a magnifying lens. A numeral 35 denotes the lens of an eye. A numeral 36 denotes a retina of the user. Herein, for making the description simpler, the arrangement is assumed as follows. The distance between the magnifying lens 34 and the liquid crystal panel 31 coincides with the focal distance of the magnifying lens 34. The focal point of the eye's lens 35 is adjusted to allow the user to clearly see the liquid crystal panel. The center A of the pixel is located on the optical axis of the lens. At first, consider rays of light emitted from the center A of the addressed pixel which then passed through the centers of the micro lenses of the array 32. These rays pass through the magnifying lens 34 by whose action they are converted into rays parallel to the optical axis of the lens 34. The parallel rays are focused onto the point B of the retina 36 through the effect of the eye lens 35. The paths of these rays are the same whether a micro lens array 32 is inserted in the arrangement or not, since by passing through the centers of individual micro lenses they are not refracted. In either case the rays will focus to B of Fig. 3. Next, consider the ray of light traveling along another passage. The rays of light are refracted through the micro lens array so that the ray may travel as if it is emitted from a different point from the point A on the liquid crystal panel. As an example, consider the ray of light 37 which seems to be emitted from a non-luminous point C located between the pixels. After the ray of light is refracted by the micro lens array, the ray is passed through a real image point corresponding to the point A and then reaches the magnifying lens 34 in which the ray is converted into a ray parallel to all other rays that appear to generate from virtual source point C. Since these rays travel as if they are emitted from the point C, the angle of the parallel rays is no longer parallel to the optical axis but has an inclination (angle p) being parallel to an auxiliary line 38 connecting the point C with the center of the magnifying lens 34. These rays interfere with each other according to the Fraunhofer grating condition. If a light path difference between the rays is close to a integer multiple of the light's wavelength, those rays are intensified by each other. In the other case, those rays are canceled by each other.. Assuming that the light path difference coincides with the light wavelength, the rays of light are refracted by the lens 35 and then are focused onto the point D at which those rays are intensified by each other. The resulting rays form an interference figure. As a result, the point A appears reproduced on the point C located in the opaque boundary between pixels. That is, the point C appears as a virtual image on the panel. In this case, the light path difference coincides with the wavelength. However, since the interference condition only requires the light path difference to be an integer multiple of the wavelength, a multitude of the interference figures, that is, the virtual image points of A are periodically produced at the same intervals as the interval c between the points A and C. Next, the expression for obtaining the interval c of the interference figure will be derived as follows. At first, the interference condition indicates that the light path difference coincides with the wavelength of the ray. Hence, the following expression 1 is established. a·p = w wherein a denotes the distance on the magnifying lens 34 between the rays passed through adjacent micro lenses, p denotes the angle of the ray to be formed with respect of an optical axis, and w denotes a wavelength of the ray. Further, with respect to the angle p, the following expression 2 will be established. p = c/b wherein b denotes the distance between the liquid crystal display and the magnifying lens, and c denotes the distance between the point A and the point C corresponding to the first interference figure. Next, by the relationship of similar triangles it is possible to establish the expression 3. b/a = e/d wherein d denotes the pitch of the micro lenses and e denotes the distance between the liquid crystal display and the micro lens array. By substituting the expressions 2 and 3 for the expression 1, it is possible to derive an expression 4 for obtaining the interval c of the interference figure. c = w e/d Next, consider the second effect of the micro lens array, in which the interference figure caused by the micro lens array is restricted to a constant range. For describing it more clearly, the part close to the liquid crystal display shown in Fig. 3 is magnified as. shown in Fig. 4. Like the first effect considered above, rays of light emitted from the point A of a pixel are refracted through the micro lens array and form a real image of the point A such as the one shown as point B. Since the rays of light travel as if emitted from within the range h, the interference figure is restricted to the range of h. This range is the same about any one of the panel's pixels. Next, the range h in which the interference figure is restricted will be derived as follows. At first, the distance between the lens and the point B is obtained by the expression 5 based on the imaging formula. g = e · f/ (e-f) wherein e denotes the distance between the liquid crystal display and the lens, f denotes a focal distance of the micro lens, and g denotes a distance between the micro lens array and the point B. Next, from the condition of similar triangles, expression 6 will be established. h = s · (g+e)/g wherein s denotes a size of the micro lens, and h denotes the range in which the interference figures of the point A appear. By substituting the expression 5 for the expression 6, it is possible to obtain the following expression 7. h = s · (e/f) In practice, when designing a micro lens array having the desired characteristics, the lens array will be designed according to the following procedure. At first, by transforming the expressions 4 and 7, the expressions 8 and 9 will be derived. d = (w · e)/c f = (s · e)/h In turn, the procedure for designing the micro lens will be discussed along the flowchart shown in Fig. 5. At step S51, an operation is performed to determine the interval c of the necessary interference figure, the range h in which the interference figures can arise, and the distance e between the liquid crystal display and the micro lens array. Then, the operation goes to a step S52 at which the pitch d of the micro lens is derived from the expression 8. Next, the operation goes to a step S53 at which the size s of the lens is determined from the pitch d of the micro lens and then goes to a step S54. At this step, the focal distance f of the micro lens is obtained from the expression 9. As an example, the liquid crystal display 61 as shown in Fig. 6 is designed. In the display, the pixels are disposed to keep a 50-micron pitch. To form just one interference figure 72 at the middle between the pixels as shown in Fig. 7 with the condition that the distance between the micro lens and the liquid crystal display is 1 mm, it is necessary to set the interval between the interference figures as 25 microns and the range of the interference figure as 75 microns. With a value of 550 nm as the wavelength of the light, the following designing values are allowed to be obtained from the expressions 8 and 9. The value of 550 nm is used as a central value of the visual spectrum. Lens Pitch of the Micro Lens Array 22 microns Focal Distance of the Micro Lens 293 microns Next, the foregoing designing method will be expanded to the case of a display where the parameters are different in the horizontal and the vertical directions. In this case, the pitch of the micro lens array and the focal distance of the micro lens will also differ in the horizontal and the vertical directions. Being able to separately adjust the interval and the range of the interference figures for each co-ordinate axis, greater freedom of design is facilitated for the image. The expressions (8) and (9) are established in the horizontal and the vertical directions if the micro lenses are disposed in a striped manner as shown in Fig.6. Hence, the same designing procedure as described above holds true to both of the horizontal and the vertical directions. The form of the range in which the interference figure takes place changes according to the form of each lens. For example, if the micro lens is formed like a hexagon, the interference figure arise in an hexagon area. Fig. 8 shows the relationship between the form of the micro lens and the range in which the interference figure takes place. The rayfan of light emitted from the point A inside of a pixel contained in the liquid crystal display 81 is refracted by the micro lens 83 so that the rayfan forms a real image of the point A on the point B. At this time, since the rays of light seem to have originated from within the range h, the interference figures are restricted to the range of h. This range holds true for any of the micro lenses. The form of the range in which the interference figure takes place is determined by the form of the micro lens 83. Based on this relation, by changing the form of the micro lens 83, it is possible to freely control the shape of the area in which the interference figures arise. Fig. 9 is a flowchart showing a designing procedure if the parameters are different in the horizontal and the vertical directions. As an example, a design is executed as shown in Fig. 10. In Fig. 10, the liquid crystal panel includes component pixels disposed in a striped manner. The pixel pitch is 30 microns in the horizontal direction and 90 microns in the vertical direction. Further, the total number of the interference figures appearing around the subject pixel is eight. The interval is 20 microns in the horizontal direction and 30 microns in the vertical direction. Hence, the range for the interference figure may be a rectangle, the horizontal side of which is 50 microns and the vertical side of which is 90 microns. In addition, the interval between the micro lens array and the liquid crystal display is set as 1 mm. The flowchart of Fig. 9 indicates a procedure for designing the micro lens if the parameters differ in the horizontal and the vertical directions. At step S91, the operation is executed to determine the distribution of the interference figures, the interval cx and cy of the interference figure in the horizontal or the vertical direction, the shape of the area in which the interference figure takes place, the ranges hx and hy in which an interference pattern takes place in the horizontal or the vertical direction, and the distance e between the liquid crystal display and the micro lens. Then, the operation goes to step S92. At this step, an operation is executed to calculate lens pitch, dx and dy, in the horizontal and vertical directions by using the expression 8. Then, the operation goes on to step S93. At this step, the distribution of the micro lenses and the form of each micro lens are determined depending on the distribution of interference figures and the range in which each interference pattern takes place. Then, the lens size and sx or sy in the horizontal and vertical directions is determined, restricting the size to within the lens pitch dx or dy obtained at the step S92. Next, the operation goes to step S94. At this step, the focal distance fx or fy of each micro lens in the vertical or the horizontal direction is determined on the expression 9. Thereby, the operation is concluded. Following the flowchart shown in Fig. 9, the below design values are calculated. Distribution of Micro Lenses Stripe Distribution Form of Micro Lens Rectangular Horizontal Lens Pitch 27 Microns Horizontal Focal Distance 560 Microns Vertical Lens Pitch 18 Microns Vertical Focal Distance 200 Microns Further, and in accordance with the present invention, the interference figures 132 in a delta distribution can be generated as shown in Fig. 13 by using a delta distributed hexagonal micro lens array 111 as shown in Fig. 11. This is effective in liquid crystal display 121 having pixel distribution as shown in Fig. 12. As shown in Fig. 11, the horizontal micro lens pitch is defined as dx and the vertical micro lens pitch is defined as dy. As shown in Fig. 13, the horizontal and vertical interval between the interference figures is defined as cx and cy. Using these definitions, expressions 8 and 9 can be applied. Hence, following the procedure shown in Fig. 9, the micro lens array can be designed. As an example in accordance with an aspect of the present invention, a design is done, as shown in Fig. 14. As shown in Fig. 14, the liquid crystal display 141 comprises pixels disposed like a delta. The horizontal and vertical pixel pitch are 30 and 40 microns, respectively. The total number of the interference figures between the subject pixel and neighboring pixel is six. The interval between the interference figures is 7.5 microns in the horizontal direction or 20 microns in the vertical direction. The area in which the interference figures take place is formed like a hexagon, the horizontal side of which is 45 microns and the vertical side of which is 60 microns. The interval between the liquid crystal display and the micro lens array is set as 1 mm. If the design procedure is performed according to the flowchart of Fig. 9 with the aforementioned parameters, the following design values defining a microlens array in accordance with an aspect of the present invention is obtained. Distribution of Micro Lenses Delta Distribution Form of Micro Lens Hexagon Horizontal Lens Pitch 73 microns Horizontal Focal Distance 1089 microns Vertical Lens Pitch 28 microns Vertical Focal Distance 467 microns When this micro lens array is applied to a color display unit, the reproduced image of each pixel overlaps with the reproduced image of an adjacent pixel. Hence, the colors of both pixels are mixed. When a user views this display's magnified image, the problem of the separation and conspicuousness of color dots is suppressed. How much the colors are mixed can be controlled by controlling the range of the interference pattern. As described above, the light field can be precisely controlled. Hence, in contrast to the system using a light scattering plate, it is possible to remove the non-luminous shadow area between pixels, while preserving the image clarity. In the case of color display unit, the color mixture is realized. Hence, a high-quality image can be obtained even if the image is magnified. Further, in the design conditions, the distance between the micro lens array and the liquid crystal display may be made smaller than the thickness of glass formed on the surface of the display. In this case, the glass on the surface of the display uses a pair of sandwiched glass plates 191 and 193 (see Fig. 15). A micro lens array 192 is sandwiched between the glass plates 191 and 193. The sandwich is placed on the liquid crystal 194 formed on a substrate glass 195. In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a mixing element can be produced by mixing the micro lens array with a diffuser to form a single optical element. In certain applications the mixed optical element will give the most desirable smoothing and mixing results.

Claims: An image display device (1) having a display unit (3) for displaying an image and a micro lens array (4, 111), which is arranged in parallel with a display surface of the display unit, and by which input pixels displayed on said display unit are visually increased in number when said pixels are output by said micro lens array, characterized in that said micro lens array comprises lenses arranged in a delta distribution. An image display device according to claim 1, wherein said micro lens array comprises rectangular lenses. An image display device according to claim 1, wherein said micro lens array comprises hexagonal lenses (111). An image display device (1) having a display unit (3) for displaying an image and a micro lens array (4, 111) which is arranged in parallel with a display surface of the display unit and by which input pixels displayed on said display unit are visually increased in number when said pixels are output by said micro lens array, characterized in that said micro lens array forms part of a mixed element which also includes a diffuser. An image display device according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein said device further comprises a magnifying means (175) for magnifying said image. An image display device according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said image displays are provided as a pair so that a user may observe a different display with each eye. An image display device according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein said display unit is a liquid crystal display.

Inventors: FARMER WILLIAM, HAMADA HIROSHI, KATO HIROMI, YAMANAKA ATSUSHI, FARMER, WILLIAM, HAMADA, HIROSHI, KATO, HIROMI, YAMANAKA, ATSUSHI
Applicants: SHARP KK, SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Application year: 1994
Main classification: G02B27
IPC codes: G02F1, G02B27