Process and device for detecting seismic signals

Abstract: Process for preparing vertical seismic profiles (VSP) of the underground interested by a bore drilling, by using, as the seismic source, the vibrations generated by the drilling bit (3), by carrying out a cross-correlation between the bit signal and the signals collected by seismic geophone lines (9-11), in which the bit signal is processed by arranging a plurality of several types of detectors (12,13,15,16) on the bore drilling facility and thus recording a plurality of traces: in them the signal/noise components have different characteristics and can be separated by means of the introduction of filter functions by operating on their Fourier Transforms or on the basis of their statistic distribution.

Description: The present invention relates the seismic survey in order to obtain data on the characteristics of the lithological formations interested by the bore drilling operations, by means of measurements of propagation of seismic signal through the layers. Such a determination is essentially based on the measurement of the detection times of reflected signals corresponding to a signal generated by a seismic source, constituted by vibrations or elastic energy impulses, after the latter being reflected on geological layers at various depth level. In general terms, the determination system is constituted by a seismic source and a plurality of signal receivers for both direct and reflected signals, distributed around the well, and by devices and procedures for processing and interpretating the return signals detected by the receivers. Used for the drilling bores, this detection technique is currently designated by means of its acronym "VSP" (Vertical Seismic Profiling) and makes it possible a representation to be obtained of underground adjacent to the drilled bore, by starting from the signal reflections on the layers which constituted it. The position of the various underground layers is reconstructed on the basis of the delay times with which the signal returns back to the receivers. The techniques for the interpretation of the reflected signals have been considerably developed, also with the aid of computer supported data processing, and make it possible information to be obtained on the formations interested by the bore drilling and on the trend of the same drilling. The conventional technique for VSP survey requires that the drilling operation is interrupted, the drill string and the drilling bit are extracted from well bore, one or more detection geophones are introduced into the already drilled bore and one or more sound impulses are generated at surface level, or at low depth, and in the nearby of the well (for example, by firing explosives charges) and the signals are detected which reach the geophones installed inside the interior of the well. Such an operating way does not cause uncertainties about the "primary" signal generated at surface level and the return signals detected do not pose serious interpretation difficulties, but is affected by considerable drawbacks. It results to be a very expensive one, also because it requires that the drilling operations are discontinued for a long time interval, and it can hence be carried out only an extremely small number of times during the course of the bore drilling. The operation of extraction and reinsertion of the drill string is a very complex and not free from risks one, and therefore requires that particular safety procedures and precautions are adopted. More recently, it was proposed that such surveys should be carried out by using, as the seismic source, the same signal generated by the drilling bit during the drilling operation. For example, the survey systems can be cited which are disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,965,774 to Atlantic Richfield, 4,862,423; 4,954,998 and 4,964,087 to Western Atlas Inc., 4,718,048 to S.N. Elf Aquitaine and 5,050,130 to Gas Research Institute. Using the same drilling bit as the seismic source offers the advantage that surface measurements can be carried out during the bore drilling operations, without interfering with the drilling activities and a large amount of data can be collected with low cost and low risks, with frequent detection campaigns, or even continuously. Unfortunately, the signal generated by the drilling bit suffers from the drawback of being affected by propagation disturbances and of being continuous overtime, and therefore it is very difficult it to establish which the reliable signal generated by the drilling bit is, in order to be able to usefully comparing it to the return signals detected by the detectors installed on the ground in the area which surrounds the well which is being drilled. In Figure 1, the typical configuration of the characteristic parts of a drilling facility and of the seismic measurement collection system is shown, in which: 1 indicates the structure of the drilling derrick, 2 indicates the drill string, which, at its end, bears the drilling bit, 3 indicates the drilling bit, 4 indicates the rotary table which trasmits the revolutionary movement to the drill string 2, 5 indicates the electrical motor which actuates the rotary table 4, 6 indicates the mud tank, 7 indicates the delivery pump for the muds which flow along the interior of the drill string 2, down to the drilling bit 3, where they leave the drill string and rise back to the surface by flowing along the well, 8 indicates the well drilled by the drilling bit 3 during its downwards movement inside the underground, inside which the muds delivered with the pump 7 rise back to the surface level, 9 indicates a line of detection sensors 10 which receive both the direct seismic signals and the reflected seismic signals generated by the seismic source represented by the drilling bit, which flow through the ground and are collected and recorded by means of a recorder 11. The detector line(s) is (are) usually simply designated as the "seismic line" and are generally positioned at a certain distance from the drilling facility, according to criteria of optimization which make it possible the seismic data to be acquired from a region with a certain surface area around the drilled bore. Such a seismic line is generally constituted by geophones, in the case when the bore is being drilled on land, or by hydrophones, in the case of off-shore drilling operations. The return signal which is measured is bound to the signal generated by the drilling bit through a transfer function and generally is affected by noise. This seismic source offers great advantages if one succeeds in locating the bit signals, which is distributed overtime and is disturbed by a strong environmental noise, for example, the noise generated by the other machinery pieces operating at the drilling facility and by the pumps, and separating said signal from such a noise. In other terms, the technical problem which the instant invention aims at solving is of obtaining a high enough signal/noise ratio in order to obtain meaningful information as to the nature and configuration of the lithological formations interested by the drilling work. The amount of noise which is present in the primary signal causes a decay in detection quality, and the noise component must be removed to an as complete as possible extent from such a signal. The present invention is based on the technique consisting in adding the contribution of a large amount of data collected by the detection sensors during a discrete time period, so as to increase said signal/noise ratio. The length of said time period during which said data can be summed up is limited by the fact that, during time, the drilling bit advances with simultaneously sinking. Such a technique finds applicative limits of practical character, for example drilling softer or less compact layers generates weaker signals and the measurements must be extended for longer time periods in order to be meaningful. Unfortunately, in such a case, drilling is faster and limitations must be faced as to the allowed time period length for the measurements, in order not to lose the space resolution, owing to the excessive sinking of the drilling bit during the measurements. The noise prevents a clear earing of the bit signal and results to be only partially removable by means of the technique consisting in adding the contribution of a large number of measurements repeated during discrete time periods: the result which can be accomplished is a better signal/noise ratio, but which is not yet high enough. The noise can be discriminated on the basis of its characteristics, for example a certain regularity, or the fact of being characterized by random peaks. The bit signal contains unpredictable components owing to the casualness of bit/rock coupling during the drilling operation. It has a self-correlation of pulsed type and can be distinguished by the environmental noise. The detection process according to the present invention is based on collecting the return signal (or, better, signals), by means of the detectors 10 and on the correlation thereof with a measurement of the signal generated by the bit, after processing it -- by collecting and using a plurality of joint measurements of the bit signal obtained from a plurality of detectors, indicated in the following as "pilot signals", such as to obtain a meaningful measurement thereof made under extremely favourable conditions, which, in its turn, constitutes a new pilot signal representative of the bit signal. The correlation operation consists, from a qualitative viewpoint, in shifting two signals to be compared to each other, over time, until they result to be aligned with strongly similar profiles. If the operation does not yield an useful result, a non-correlation exists between the compared signals. The self-correlation operation consists in comparing the signal to itself, in order to identify possible echoes or reverberations. The cross-correlation is the operation of correlation between the pilot signal and the signals collected by means of the seismic line. In this way, the signal constituted by a time sequence of impulses (intensity peaks with positive or negative sign) is identified: it is concentrated into one single impulsed signal for each geophysical event measured, for example the direct signal emitted by the drilling bit followed by its reflected signals. This signal is generally constituted by a plurality of impulses with well identified relative amplitude and time coordinate. It must be also taken into account the fact that the pilot signal in practice is not an ideal signal, because: the pilot signal has its own delay due to the signal propagation from the drilling bit to the detector which measures it. Inasmuch as the correlation time is a relative delay between two signals, in order to obtain the absolute delay of the geophysical data measured on the field, the delay already contained in the pilot signal must be compensated for; the pilot signal is not the only sequence of impulses generated by the drilling bit, but also contains its repetitions due to reverberation phenomena, for example, inside the interior of the drilling facility, which has its own characteristics of elastic vibration; each signal collected by the detectors must therefore be de-reverberated during the processing step, in order that one can reconstruct a meaningful signal generated by the drilling bit. Each measurement which is used for the determination of the pilot signal contains environmental and spurious noises overlapping to the drilling bit signal; the detected signals must be processed in order to reduce the presence of such a noise and reinforce the signal. Basing on the terms of the technical problem as exposed up to now and on the general lines of the technique of seismic detection by using the drilling bit as the seismic source, the detection system according to the present invention will be disclosed now as regards its typical constituents, by referring to the schematic of Figure 1 which illustrates a typical embodiment thereof, for illustrative, non-limitative purposes. Already in U.S. Patent No. 4,954,998 cited above, proposed is a solution of active subtraction of the noise from the pilot signal, according to which noise is collected with a different detector installed on the same drill string, which detector is regarded as being substantially non-responsive to the drilling bit signal, by selecting the frequency band of such a noise, amplifying it and then subtracting it from the pilot signal. US-A-4 965 774 discloses a process wherein the signal from the seismometers is processed with the signal from another sensor type, for example a vibration sensing means attached to the drill string, in order to provide references for time of signal emanation from the drill bit, improved s/n ratios, improved sensitivity and discrimination. Unfortunately, such a technical solution does not seem to be really satisfactory, because it does not take into consideration the simultaneous presence of a plurality of signal and noise traces coming from different sources. The technique proposed by this prior document results to be an orthogonalization technique based on separately measuring the noise present in the pilot signal, which however does not realize the statistical independence. In fact, this signal, in order to be subtracted without distorsions from the output signal, should not contain any residues of drilling bit signal, a condition which, on considering the above said prior document, we cannot understand how it could be realized in the industrial practice. The present invention essentially consists in preparing the pilot signal which must be then correlated with the signals collected by the seismic detectors 10. In the processes disclosed in the prior art, the detectors destined to detect the pilot signal generated by the drilling bit are typically installed on the drill string. The selection of the sensors results to be important when one single pilot detector is used by means of which it is important that a drilling bit signal is identified which not only is strong (in the sense that its meaningful peaks have meaningful amplitudes), but above all, is a good-quality one (in the sense that such meaningful peaks are not affected by noises which may render them difficult to be identified). By means of the process according to the present invention, which combines a plurality of signals in order to decompose them separating the contributions from the different physical phenomena, the operator can use strong signals without having to limit himself to the use of noise-free signals, which may be unavailable. In particular, the present invention concerns a process for preparing vertical seismic profiles (VSP) which supplies information on the underground geologic formations interested by a well bore drilling, which uses as the seismic source the vibrations produced by the same drilling bit and compares them, by cross-correlation, with the signals collected from a plurality of receivers so installed as to constitute one or more receiving seismic lines designed to receive the seismic waves which are generated by the operating drilling bit, characterized in that the pilot signal which is representative of the signal generated by the drilling bit is obtained and processed on the basis of the combination of the traces detected by a plurality of sensors of different types and arranged on the derrick structure and/or around the drilling facility, with the trace supplied by each sensor type having characteristics of distribution in time and of weight of its signal/noise components which are different from those of the traces obtained from the sensors of different types, in which said processing is carried out by separating such components from each other in order to reconstruct a meaningful drilling bit signal to be used for said cross-correlation, said sensors to be used in combination, are of at least two different types, and that these are selected from: a)-- vibration sensors, which supply data on the impulses generated by the motion of the drilling bit, in order to detect the signal transmitted to the derrick through the drill string through the derrick-drill string coupling, and suitable for detecting the environmental noise which is transmitted through the derrick, preferably arranged on the same structure of the drilling derrick, b)-- electrical current intensity sensors, in order to measure the instantaneous current absorption by the motor which drives the rotary table, c)-- pressure sensor means installed on the drilling mud pipeline system, in order to measure signal and noise propagating in the mud, d)-- geophones or equivalent vibration sensors, installed on the same yard of the drilling probe, suitable for capturing the impulses generated by the drilling bit and transmitted through soil, as well as the environmental noise which is transmitted through said soil. In particular, the sensors a) are selected from geophones or accelerometers, sensors b) are ammeters, sensors c) are preferably installed on the mud circulation pump delivery duct and sensors d) are seismic geophones or accelerometers or other equivalent sensors preferably installed in the nearby of the mud pumps and/or power generator units and/or other machinery of the workings. The process according to the present invention makes it possible signals to be advantageously used in which the noises and the drilling bit signals display power spectra which may even be comparable, provided that the signals and the noises are characterized -- as it in reality occurs -- by statistical behaviours determined by different laws and in different proportions in the measurements carried out. As previously indicated, according to the present invention, the pilot signal is obtained and processed on the basis of the detection of a plurality, at least two or more, of pilot detectors of different types, as indicated in the following: (a) vibration detectors 13 installed on the derrick structure 1, for example geophones, accelerometers or, anyway, monoaxial or triaxial detectors which supply information as on the environmental noise and on the impulses generated by the movement of the drilling bit, in order to detect the signal transmitted to the derrick through the drill string, through the derrick-string coupling by means of the support cables 14. In fact, it was found that is not necessary to install the detectors directly on the drill string, where they are difficult and uncomfortable to be installed and managed owing to the continuous interventions on the drill string by the operators; (b) current intensity detectors 15, for example an ammeter, in order to measure the instantaneous absorption of electrical current by the motor 5 of the rotary table 4. The twisting stresses applied to the components of the drill string are transmitted to the same string to the rotaty table which is connected with the motor. Such detectors supply the measure of a variable dimension of a different type from the dimension measured by the vibration detectors 13, with which it results however to be strictly correlated; (c) pressure detectors 16 installed in the mud loop, for example in the pump 7 delivery duct. The vibration induced by the bit 3 bumps during the drilling step propagates through the muds and reaches the surface level. The propagation through the mud causes a time offset between the arrival of the impulses and the arrival of the same impulses through the string steel and is less sensible to the reverberation phenomena which, on the contrary, take place to a considerable extent as regards the propagation through the metal; (d) geophones 12, or equivalent vibration detectors, installed on the same yard as of the drilling string, suitable for detecting from ground, with a different amplitude, both the noises generated by the drilling machinery and the useful signal coming from the drilling bit. Each of these different types of detectors to be used in combination with one another detects a signal which propagated through a different transmission means: the steel of the string, the electrical connection of the motor, the drilling mud and the ground through which the drilling is carried out, each of which has a different influence on the signal/noise ratio. Each of these detectors used in combination with one another supplies a signal, or, better, a trace, with a time offset relatively to the other detectors: in such traces, the signal/noise components assumes different weights, and thus such components can be separated from one another in order to obtain a meaningful signal generated by the drilling bit, to be used for cross-correlation. Each detector supplies hence a sequence of measured values, expressed in either digital or analog values, currently referred to as the "trace". Each trace is constituted by a set of measured values expressed as digital or analog values, characterized by two essential data, an intensity value and a time coordinate value, which may become an ordinal number of the measurement during the course of the determination. The intensity value according to the present invention can be expressed, according to the detectors taken into consideration, as a particle speed due to the effect of the elastic waves due to sound propagation (as measured by geophones), as a pressure (as measured by the pressure ganges installed on mud delivery duct), and as an acceleration (as measured by the accelerometers) or, finally, as the electrical current absorbed by the electrical motor (as measured by an ammeter). Another measurable parameter can be strain, which can be measured by using precision strain gauges. The traces obtained from the above cited detectors result to be coherent with each other and make it possible the peaks determined by the drilling bit impulses to be identified by correlation. According to a preferred embodiment, the data detecting and recording are carried out with digital values. The measured values are then combined with each other in order to prepare a very meaningful pilot signal, to be used for its correlation with the signals detected by means of the seismic line. The combination methods in order to generate this pilot signal may be more or less sophisticated. The pilot signals are time-aligned, or simply re-arranged: the measurement scanning times may supply the time correspondance, based on the order of the measurements; they can be filtered, so as to be made similar to a reference signal with a known delay, which may be one from the above listed pilot signals. For example, as the reference trace the trace obtained from the detector 13 can be adopted, because the length of the drilling string and the sound speed in steel are known, and therefore, a reliable value of the true delay between a drilling bit bump and the arrival to the detector 13 of the impulse which corresponds to it, can be obtained. As already illustrated hereinabove, the sensors 12, 13, 15 and 16... for watching the signals destined to produce the pilot signal receive the N traces P j (ω), wherein j = 1...N. These traces are used as transforms inside their frequency domain (ω indicates frequency). By the expression "transform inside the frequency domain" generally the decomposition is meant of the signal into the elementary sinusoidal oscillations which are present in it, each of them with its own phase and amplitude. So, in order to describe each component, two real numbers are necessary, and therefore complex numbers are used (reference is made to Prodi G. "Analisi Matematica", 1976, pages 91/97). The transform is well known with the name of "Fourier transform" (see Bracewell R. "The Fourier transform and its applications", 1985). The frequency domain constitutes a very useful domain for the determination of signals owing to the simplicity which the operation of correlation between two signals assumes in it, which operation simply consists in calculating the product, frequency by frequency, of the first signal times the conjugated complex (indicated with the symbol "*") of the second signal. And furthermore, the filtering operation is carried out by simply multiplying, frequency by frequency, the filter spectrum times the spectrum of the signal to be filtered. With this necessary explicative foreword, the trace P 1 (ω) of the detector 13 is then estimated on the basis of the values of P 2 (ω)...P N (ω), by using the following method. After having aligned -- on an approximate basis -- the pilot signals as a function of time, the new values P j (ω) = P j * (ω)P 1 (ω) [P j (ω)] 2 + e P j (ω) j=2,...N are calculated. The horizontal line indicates a frequency average and e indicates a blank noise, i.e., a constant frequency value which is added to the term which expresses the average power spectrum |P j (ω) 2 | in order to render stable the inversion. This a rather small value such as not to meaningfully alter the signal spectrum, but large enough in order to prevent that in the regions (in frequence) of signal absence, denominator values close to 0 may produce values of the fraction in equation (1) which are excessively large. The fraction of the expression (1) represents the filter which adapts the signal P j (ω) to the signal P 1 (ω) yielding the estimated value P j (ω). Each of values P and j (ω), j = 2,....N constitutes a new processed pilot signal which reproduces the correlated portion present in P 1 (ω), i.e., the signal shared with the other signals collected with the other sensors, which results to be present in P 1 (ω). A simple combination method consists in computing the summation of values P and j (ω), j=2,....N, and using this value as the pilot signal. This data must be corrected with the delay of P 1 (ω), and results to be better than the one resulting from P 1 alone, and than those supplied by other sensors alone, in the event when the correlated noise present in P 1 is negligible. The so determined value strengthens the correlated portion between the pilot sensors. If the correlated noise between the signals from the pilot sensors is negligible, the estimate of filters is effective and the residual noise is removed from the summation operation. If, on the contrary, the correlated noise between the pilot signals is not negligible, there is a distorsion of the filters which bind the signals coming from the drilling bit between the different pilot sensors. In that case, the residual subtraction of the noises can be carried out by means of the processing procedure which is disclosed hereinafter, and which makes it possible the procedure to be carried out also with signals affected by a considerable noisiness. In fact, this process makes it possible the pilot signals to be combined, with the signal/noise ratio being increased in the estimate of a good-quality representative signal, so as to extract, even from considerably noisy signals, the meaningful drilling bit signal, and remove the noise present in the same data. The process consists in decomposing the pilot signals into the contributions from the several physical phenomena which sum up in the measurements collected with the sensors. The different pilot signals are combined with one another, taking into account that the phenomena which generate the signal (intensity peaks -- of either mechanical or sound vibrations, of pressure or of absorbed current -- from the drilling bit, side impacts of the components of the drill string, yard noise, and so forth) are characterized by different statistical distributions. The purpose of the process is of preparating, by starting from the signals measured by the pilot sensors, the impacts coming from the drilling bit, both from the noise generated from steady-state operation of the machinery of the workings, as well as from the side impacts of the drill string along the well and from the other noises deriving from the drilling operation, but not from drilling bit impulses. In order to obtain this separation, different methods may be followed; for example, one might have resort to the verification of the independence of the reconstructed processes, or to the verification that the reconstructed processes have statistical characteristics congruent with those hypothesized a priori . In both cases, the operation is carried out by aligning the pilot signals with each other, so as to compare possibly deconvoluted corresponding events --by "deconvolution" an operation of reverse filtering is currently understood which effectively removes the reverberations and the "multiples" of the drilling bit signal -- in order to remove the reverberations present in them, and possibly filtered in order to render the impulse responses from the individual channels similar to one another. If an instantaneous event generates a signal which is measured in a channel, it produces not precisely an impulse, but a signal with a wave shape, generally very short during time, which depends on a plurality of factors, such as, e.g., the characteristics of the sensor, the dimension which is being measured, the coupling between the sensor and the medium to which it is applied, and so forth. Therefore, filtering operators can be created which compensate for these differences by starting both from the knowledge of the characteristics of the instruments, and from direct measurements, as the estimate of the filters for manual adaptation of signals from different sensors, as disclosed hereinabove. The separation operation according to both the processes of independence verification and of congruence request is disclosed, for the sake of simplicity, by referring to two pilot signals P 1 and P 2 P 1 = aS + bN P 2 = cS + dN constituted by the overlapping of signal S and of noise N with the weights a, b, c, d. The independence verification processes takes usefully advantage of the concept that signal and noise not only are perpendicular to each other, but are also statistically independent. In order to render clearer the discussion, and to better describe the use of the techniques of statistical processing of signals by means of the process according to the present invention, the meaning of the concepts of perpendicularity and statistical independence of signals are stated in greater detail in the following. The variables x and y indicate two random variables, commonly indicated as "stochastic", i.e., they show a behaviour characterized by a probability distribution (reference is made here to Papoulis A. "Probability, random variables and stochastic processes", 2nd Edition, 1984). The condition of statistical independence implies that E[f(x)g(y)] = E[f(x)]E[g(y)] wherein f( ) and g( ) are two functions of a whatever kind and E indicates the expectation value (see Papoulis). For a set of M samples, the expectation value E is expressed with good approximation by the expression whilst the condition expressed in equation (3) implies in correlation between x and y, i.e.: E[xy] = E[x]E[y] The application to the real case which corresponds to the processing of the seismic data according to the present invention assumes particular meanings. In the true real, there is a non-limitative condition that the data are with zero average E[x] = E[y] = 0 and that the same holds true also for their odd powers E[x (2n+1) ] = E[y (2n+1) ] = 0 n = 0,1,2... From expressions (5) and (6), it follows that x and y are perpendicular to each other, i.e.: E[xy] = E[x]E[y] = 0 Analogously, equations (3) and (7) ensure that the mutual momenta expressed by the first term of equation (3) are zero for odd powers of higher order than the first order of the random variables x and y. With these explanatory premises, by applying this type of processing to the pilot signals, the procedure is as follows. In the simple case of two pilot signals, P 1 and P 2 with thus be combined with suitable coefficients (or weights), so as to obtain combinations x and y, and by means of the equation (8) it is verified whether the reconstructed signals defined by such combinations are incorrelated with each other, and furthermore the statistical independence is verified. Such verifications make it possible a point in space of combinations (x,y) to be located, which yields the solution of the sought problem. The extension to a plurality of signals is carried out by increasing the size of the space of combinations and the number of verifications of perpendicularity and independence. This point identifies the weight functions with which the pilot signals must be combined, so as to substantially reach the statistical independence and not only obtain incorrelation of different combinations, as it is described in the prior art. In other terms, by means of the process according to the present invention, the signal from the drilling bit is focused and distinguished by decomposing the pilot sensor signals into statistically independent events. According to a different embodiment of the present invention, a further verification method consists in separating the overlapped processes into the several pilot signals according to expressions (2), verifiying that the reconstructed processes have statistical characteristics congruent with those a priori hypothesizable on the basis of the physical nature of the phenomenon, by using the n-th momenta of x and y variables, which, for the variable x, can be expressed as m n = E[x n ] x = 1...n In fact, by using the statistical hypotheses, the conditions can be introduced which relate not only to the first momenta (average values) or second momenta (statistical definition of correlation), but also higher-order momenta. Such a further verification method makes resort to "kurtosis" (see Walden A. T., 1985, Non-Gaussian reflectivity, entropy and deconvolution: Geophysics, vol. 50, No. 12, pages 2862-2888) which is calculated as the fourth momentum divided by the square of the second momentum of the variable. The combinations of the obtained signals which verify such conditions are then the solution sought for. For explanatory purposes, the case may be taken into consideration when both the drilling bit signal and the noise, overlapped in the signals according to expressions (2), have impulse self-correlation and are incorrelated to each other. They originate an impulse peak both in self-correlations and in cross-correlations of the signals (2), and therefore it is not possible to learn to which extent the one and the other of them contribute to such signals. If the noise and the drilling bit signal do not have the same statistics and one of them, for example the first one, is characterized by isolated impulse signals (as it may happen for the side impacts of the drill string), kurtosis proved to be an estimate means which is sensible to the higher order statistics and results to be a good indicator of the presence of isolated peaks (kurtosis > 3 and the more increasing, the more isolated the peaks are). This behaviour makes it possible maximal (or minimal) kurtosis conditions to be imposed for the combinations of signals (2) with suitable coefficients, or, more generally, for some functions of said combinations. The combination, and, consequently, the weight functions which identify it, which complies with such a maximum or minimum condition is the solution sought for, because it completely separates the higher-kurtosis process (for example the noise characterized by isolated peaks) from the lower-kurtosis processes (for example, the more uniform signal emitted by the drilling bit). The same separation method holds true in the opposite case, when, on the contrary, the noise has higher uniformity characteristics than the drilling bit signal, in which the higher-kurtosis process is the drilling bit signal process. Also this verification method makes it possible a good drilling bit signal to be reconstructed. The pilot signal processed with the methods disclosed heretofore is then used in the cross-correlation between the pilot signal which represents the primary signal and the signals collected by the geophones 10 of the seismic line 9. The result obtained by means of the processing procedures disclosed up to now is a good quality seismic signal representative of the impulses of the drilling bit and separated from its noise components. Examples The process according to the present invention was tested on the field at the drilling facility Casanova Staffora 1 of Agip S.p.A., in the territory of the municipality of S. Margherita Staffora (PV), with the following modalities. The recordings were carried out by signal groups, each 24 seconds long, for a total time of approximately 500 seconds per each group (20-21 recordings). The recordings were started after each 2 metres of advancement of the drilling bit. The top view of the drilling yard and the positions of the various instruments and connections is reported in Figure 2, and the configuration of the seismic line is indicated in the map of Figure 3. Such a layout scheme was selected in order to identify and discriminate the noises generated by the external environmental noise sources, or "spurious noise", i.e., the noise capable of summing up and masking the noise generated by the drilling bit. In particular, the recording line was placed in that zone which was regarded as being as the most "noiseless" as regards the spurious noises, such as road traffic or other noises due to human activities in the region, according to a layout with contained level differences and with the following parameters: intertrace, i.e., distance between two adjacent listening points, 20 metres; 10 Hz geophones; each listening point of the recording line, or seismic line, is constituted by 12 equispaced geophones (vertical component Z), the signals of which are summed up. The signal detection instruments installed on the drilling facility are: differential pressure gauge 16, located on a branch of the delivery duct, ammeter, installed on the power supply system which feeds the motor which actuates the rotary table; geophone 13 (vertical component Z) rigidly keyed to the drilling derrick latticework. The listening points on the yard were constituted by geophones 12, some of them with vertical component (Z), other with three components (X,Y,Z) installed in the nearby of the mud pumps and power generator units. The technical characteristics and specifications of the instruments of the data acquisition system used in the tests are as follows: Recorder: Sercel type SN-348 Number of channels 120 Control system IFP Control dynamics 84 db Data format GRC 6250 BPI SEG B Number of traces 9 Geophones Type Sensor SM4 Natural frequency 10 Hz Resistance 70 Ohm Number per string 12 Pressure gauge Manufacturer PCB Piezoelectronics Inc. Model H 112A S/N 6720 Range 0 - 3000 psi Maximal pressure 10000 psi Resolution 0,004 psi Sensibility 1,26 pC/psi Linearity 1% FS Natural frequency 300 kHz Size: - diameter 1,23 inches - length 0,25 inches Weight 5 g Ammeter: This is a measuring instrument for measuring the electrical current absorbed by the motor. The ammeter supplies an electrical signal which is proportional to the changes in current absorbed by the motor which drives the rotary table, which is commonly measured in order to control the twisting torque applied to the drilling string. In the instant case, the ammeter was applied to the electrical motor power supply cable and generates a voltage signal which is comprised within the range of 0-100 mVolt. Such a signal is then amplified to a range of 0-10 Volt and then is transmitted to a measurement system which converts it into kilogrammetres. Such values are both displayed in real time on the yard operating control monitors and are recorded in the storage of the yard computer, after the signal being previously converted from analog into digital with a peripheral unit. The recording line was designed on the ground with stations being provided at regular distances of 10 metres, installing a group of geophones at each second station (i.e., at the stations with even progressive number), by starting from the station 100 to the station 220 of Figure 3. The recording line started at a distance of 100 metres from the well and continued in North-West direction for 1200 metres. The data collecting operations lasted approximately three months. 6633 recordings of 24 seconds long signals were carried out. The signals were collected in groups, at intervals, not always exactly regular, of 2 metres of sinking of the drilling bit, from level -743 m to level -1837 m. The collected data were then processed by means of the previously disclosed techniques by numerical processing, in order to recognize the direct arrival of the signal generated by the drilling bit, in order to verify their "nature", also in relation to the physical characteristics of the drilling facility. Besides the direct arrivals, other components were identified which may be reconducted to reflected events under the drilling bit, with which the relevant VSP section was carried out. The results reported in the following examples were obtained by processing single records of 24 seconds of length, with a sampling frequency of 4 milliseconds. As regards the values reported in the independentization charts of Figures 4, 6 and 7, on the abscissa the angle is indicated (as sexasegimal degrees) with which the pilot traces taken into consideration are combined, it being understood, by this expression, that the first pilot trace is multiplied times the cosinus of said angle and the second one is multiplied times the cosinus of said angle, and the second one is multiplied times the sinus of said angle, and the resulting values are added to each other in order to obtain the combination. In order to verify the independence, two combinations (when two pilot signals are taken into consideration) must be available, according to the equations presented above. They are obtained as follows: for each combination, the other combination is determined which best verifies the perpendicularity condition. For such pairs the higher momentums are then checked, with the reported charts being obtained. On the ordinate, on the contrary, the amplitude relevant to the maximal value of the monitored dimension is reported. The central line represents zero axis, the values in the upper portion of the chart are positive values. The dimension which is determined in this case is the relative deviation of formula (3) for even powers of x and y: in other terms, the dimension which is determined is the difference between the first and the second members of the equation (3), divided by the first member of the same equation, for the even momentums of the combination pairs as cited hereinabove. Whenever this relative difference disclosed to zero, the independence condition (3) is verified. As regards the dimensions reported in the correlation charts of Figures 4, 5, 6 and 8, the time range on the ordinate t(s) represents the correlation time, the zero value of which should be considered at 2.0 seconds in the range of the Figure. in other terms, time 0.0 represents the correlation time -2.0, time 4.0 represents the correlation time 2.0, and so forth. The correlations of the charts of Figures 4 and 6 (upper portions) represent the correlations repeated for different combinations of the pilot signals with the same trace of the seismic line. In this case, the horizontal coordinate is the same angle of the independence chart (bottom portion). In the charts of Figures 5 and 8, the signal along the seismic line is observed. The horizontal coordinate of such figures represent the distance from the well, which varies within indicated intervals for the preselected line traces. A general observation on the examples reported in the following demonstrate that the independence verification charts, by mirroring the behaviour of the verification correlations, make it possible the complete trend and the separation points between processes of different nature to be clearly located, by observing the contribution of such processes in the verification correlations. In particular, for the indicated values a clear impulse signal can be observed which corresponds to the direct arrival of the signal from the drilling bit, which arrives soon after two seconds (in the range of the figure). Furthermore, also the separation of noise for the corresponding combination values is clearly apparent. Such points are identified by arrows provided in the low portion of the figures. It should be stated in detail that the operation of de-convolution in the following examples refers to the so said "spike" de-convolution: operator length 2 seconds and 0.5% of blank noise added (see 0. Yilmaz, "Seismic Data Processing, 1987, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pages 100, 101, 103, 114, and 116). Example 1 The pilot signals used are the traces supplied by the pressure gauge installed in the mud system and of the sensor-geophone installed on the derrick. The measurements were carried out while the drilling bit was drilling at the depth of 864 meters (as referred to the rotary table). The following process steps were carried out: 1. the derrick signal is de-convoluted; 2. such a signal is estimated by using the pressure gauge signal according to the expression (1); 3. both so processed signals are then combined with each other with relative weights, indicated by means of rotations of from 0° to 180° according to as exposed hereinabove, so as to determine (x,y) combination pairs perpendicular to each other; 4. the statistical independence is then checked with the expressions (3) of the individual combination pairs, using the following algorithm: E[x 4 y 2 -E[x 4 ]E[y 2 ] E[x 4 y 2 ] In the charts of Figure 4, the bottom portion represents the verification of the condition of statistical independence. The first point indicated by the left-hand side arrow (abscissa of approximately 52°) and the second point indicated by the right-hand side arrow (abscissa of approximately 127°) are separation points. In the charts of Figure 4, the high portion reports an a posteriori check, in order to illustrate the effectiveness of the process according to the present invention, which represents the correlations of the respective combinations of the low portion of the figure with a seismic line test trace with a listening point situated at approximately 400 metres. For the identified separation points, the separation between signal and noise is evidenced: in fact, in the test correlations, at the angle of 52° a minimal peak can be observed of the noise distributed along the trace, and at the angle of 126°, the signal correlation peak nearly totally disappears. Example 2 The charts of Figure 5 represent the separation between signal and noise which is obtained by correlating the independent combinations according to the check made in the charts of Figure 4, by operating on the signals from the seismic line installed in the nearby the well (the horizontal abscissa ranging from the trace on the left-hand side, corresponding to the distance of 240 metres from the well, to the trace 54, on the right-hand side, corresponding to the distance of 1300 metres). The left side portion indicates the noise, i.e., the combination carried out with an angle of 127°, and the right side portion indicates the drilling bit signal, i.e., the combination carried out with an angle of 52°. Example 3 From the charts depicted in Figure 6, the results are reported which are obtained when as the pilot signal the traces generated by the geophone sensor installed on the yard and of the geophone sensor installed on the derrick are used. The measurements were carried out while the drilling bit was drilling at the depth of -864 metres (as referred to the rotary table). The processing procedure is the same as disclosed and used in Example 1. In the charts of Figure 6, the bottom portion represents the check of the condition of statistical independence carried out by using, in this case, the algorithm: E[x 4 y 4 ]-E[x 4 ]E[y 4 ] E[x 4 y 4 ] A first point and a second point were identified at abscissa values of approximately 105° and 165°, respectively. The intersection points with the horizontal axis, evidenced by the arrows depicted at the bottom of the Figure, identify the independent combinations which separate the drilling bit signal from the noise, as it was then checked from the correlations with a test trace obtained from a listening point in the seismic line at a distance of about 400 metres, which are represented in the top portion of the Figure. Example 4 As pilot signals, the signals were taken which come from the ammeter and from the geophone installed on the drilling derrick. The measurements were carried out while the drilling bit was drilling at the depth of -1544 metres, by proceeding as follows: 1. the derrick signal was estimated from the ammeter signal by means of the expression (1); 2. both resulting signals are then combined analogously to as disclosed in Example 1, so as to obtain perpendicular (x,y) combination pairs; 3. the statistical independence of the individual combinations was checked with the expression (3), using the algorithm of Example 3, as reported in Figure 7; 4. the combinations which represent the separation result (abscissae at 73° and 156°) were then de-convoluted. According to as reported in the charts of Figure 8, such traces are correlated with the signals from the seismic line placed at a certain distance from the well (from 880 metres -- trace 40 to 1300 metres --trace 61, as reported at the topside of Figure 8). In Figure 8, the comparison is illustrated between the signal which is obtained by using the only pilot signal from the derrick, after being de-convoluted (record A), and the reconstructed signals after the separation. To the data a filter was applied which removes the high noise frequencies introduced by the de-convolution and the lower frequencies. In record B, the noise with angle 73° is reported. In the record C, at the right-hand side, the signal with angle 156° is illustrated. The direct arrival of the signal appears in reconstructed form in the central portion of the record C, relatively to the corresponding portion of the record A, as one may remark by observing the Figure at the height of the side arrow.

Claims: Process for preparing vertical seismic profiles (VSP) which supplies information on the underground geologic formations interested by a well bore drilling, which uses as the seismic source the vibrations produced by the same drilling bit (3) and compares them, by cross-correlation, with the signals collected from a plurality of receivers so installed as to constitute one or more receiving seismic lines designed to receive the seismic waves which are generated by the operating drilling bit (3), characterized in that the pilot signal which is representative of the signal generated by the drilling bit is obtained and processed on the basis of the combination of the traces detected by a plurality of sensors of different types and arranged on the derrick structure (1) and/or around the drilling facility, with the trace supplied by each sensor type having characteristics of distribution in time and of weight of its signal/noise components which are different from those of the traces obtained from the sensors of different types, in which said processing is carried out by separating such components from each other in order to reconstruct a meaningful drilling bit signal to be used for said cross-correlation, said sensors to be used in combination, are of at least two different types, and that these are selected from: a)-- vibration sensors, (13) which supply data on the impulses generated by the motion of the drilling bit (3), in order to detect the signal transmitted to the derrick (1) through the drill string (2) through the derrick-drill string coupling, and suitable for detecting the environmental noise which is transmitted through the derrick (1), preferably arranged on the same structure of the drilling derrick (1), b)-- electrical current intensity sensors (15), in order to measure the instantaneous current absorption by the motor (5) which drives the rotary table (4), c)-- pressure sensor means (16) installed on the drilling mud pipeline system, in order to measure signal and noise propagating in the mud, d)-- geophones (12) or equivalent vibration sensors, installed on the same yard of the drilling probe, suitable for capturing the impulses generated by the drilling bit (3) and transmitted through soil, as well as the environmental noise which is transmitted through said soil. Process according to claim 1, characterised in that the sensors a) are selected from geophones or accelerometers, sensors b) are ammeters, sensors c) are preferably installed on the mud circulation pump delivery duct and sensors d) are seismic geophones or accelerometers or other equivalent sensors preferably installed in the nearby of the mud pumps and/or power generator units and/or other machinery of the workings. Process for preparing vertical seismic profiles (VSP) which supply information on the underground geologic formations interested by a well bore drilling, which uses as the seismic source the vibrations produced by the same drilling bit (3) according to one or more of claims from 1 to 2, characterized in that in the drilling bit signal processing, the traces obtained from the drilling bit signal sensors are preliminarily de-reverberated, said de-reverberation being carried out by de-convolution, also said "reverse filtering", in order to remove from them the reverberations and the "multiple frequencies" of the drilling bit signal. Process for preparing vertical seismic profiles (VSP) which supply information on the underground geologic formations interested by a well bore drilling, which uses as the seismic source the vibrations produced by the same drilling bit according to one or more of claims from 1 to 3, characterized in that in the drilling bit signal processing, the traces obtained from the drilling bit signal sensors are used as transformed in their frequency domain and that, after the obtained signals being aligned in time, a signal filtering operation is carried out by multiplying, frequency by frequency, the filter spectra times the spectra of the signal to be filtered, according to the expression P j (ω) = P j *(ω)P 1 (ω) [P j (ω)] 2 + e P j (ω) and then the so obtained values P and j (ω) are combined and the resulting value from the combination is used as the drilling bit pilot signal for the cross-correlation with the signals collected by means of the seismic line. Process for preparing vertical seismic profiles (VSP) which supply information on the underground geologic formations interested by a well bore drilling, which uses as the seismic source the vibrations produced by the same drilling bit according to one or more of claims from 1 to 4, characterized in that in the drilling bit signal processing, the signals P 1 , P 2 , ... P n obtained from the sensors are treated as stochastic variables by attributing to them coefficients, i.e., weights, so as to obtain non-correlated combinations which are perpendicular to each other and that their statistical independence is furthermore checked by decomposing the signals supplied by the pilot sensors into statistically independent events. Process for preparing vertical seismic profiles (VSP) which supply information on the underground geologic formations interested by a well bore drilling, which uses as the seismic source the vibrations produced by the same drilling bit according to claim 5, characterized in that the statistical separation between the events of impulse type and the events of uniform character is carried out by using the kurtosis, i.e., the fourth momentum divided by the square of the second momentum of the variable, as an estimate means sensible to the higher order statistics and as the indicator of the presence of isolated peaks, with said event types being separated by imposing maximalkurtosis (or minimalkurtosis) conditions, for the separation of the drilling bit signals.

Inventors: ANGELERI GIAMPIERO, PERSOGLIA SERGIO, POLETTO FLAVIO, ROCCA FABIO, ANGELERI, GIAMPIERO, PERSOGLIA, SERGIO, POLETTO, FLAVIO, ROCCA, FABIO
Applicants: ENI SPA, OSSERVATORIO GEOFISICO SPERIME, ENI S.P.A., OSSERVATORIO GEOFISICO SPERIMENTALE
Application year: 1994
Main classification: G01V1
IPC codes: G01V1