Method and instrument for selecting personal compatible colors

Abstract: Skin coloration categories are identified based upon blue and yellow undertones of the skin using a color measuring device, developing the Hunter b value, utilizing that value alone to determine which of several categories of skin coloration a subject's skin exhibits. Category selection is made by comparison of measured Hunter b with ranges of Hunter b value of skin color categories. Instrumentation to effect the method includes the color measuring device, a central processing unit (CPU), memory storing the ranges of Hunter b, and an output device such as a printer, LCD, or CRT. The skin color Hunter b is calculated and compared to stored ranges to assign a category. The output device displays the category of skin color based upon the central processing unit's comparison. Colors compatible with skin color categories are identified or formulated based upon broad color family designation, yellow, brown, red, etc., and a comparison of measured and stored ranges of known or specially developed color characteristics for the particular family.

Description: This invention relates to a process, colour charts and swatch packs for identifying categories of skin coloration for compatibility with colors of clothing, makeup, etc., and more particularly to methods and apparatus for classifying skin color based upon its blue and yellow undertones and for assigning one of a plurality of basic categories for which compatible colors have been selected. Recently, numerous proposals for identifying colors of, for example, clothing, makeup, hair colorants, and the like, based upon an individual person's coloration have been put forth. Some of these proposed techniques have taken into account the color of the person's complexion, but have incorrectly emphasized redness and have also wrongly relied upon eye color, color of hair, and even racial background to assign color categories to the person. Based on that assignment a preselected collection of colors of fabric or other materials was chosen. Draping techniques, whereby drapes of a series of colors are placed adjacent an individual's face for an assessment of compatibility, have been in widespread use. The purpose has been to better enable the evaluated individual to choose clothing and other items of a harmonious color. These draping techniques have had some success. Being subjective, they depend, however, upon the observational skills of the one who conducts the assessment and cannot be relied upon for consistent accuracy. Much has been written about the various color assessment techniques. Often this has been misleading in that the true scientific basis for skin color categorization was not perceived. Again, for example, writings on the subject have advised attention to eye color, hair color, or race, or have suggested assessment of the redness or pallor of the subject individual. Although blue and yellow have been mentioned along with other colors and/or features said to contribute to an assessment of compatible colors, there have been only vague mentions of these broad color families encompassing many different colors in the blue and yellow families. There has not been any clear expression of exact blues or yellows contributing to the proposed assessments. Nor has there been any exact specification of a reproducible parameter derived from these colors and capable of accurate, consistent use in skin color assessment. Several attempts have been made to quantify color assessment. It has been generally recognized by those who have considered the possibility that a consistent, scientifically sound, and reproducible technique for accurately categorizing an individual's skin coloration would be extremely desirable as would the availability of an instrument for consistently and accurately assessing and categorizing skin color. EP-A-0 446 512 discloses the use of the blue to yellow part of the spectra to classify skin color and to assist in the selection of proper colors for individual wearers. A similar method is also known from US-A-4 681 546. In color identification utilized in other endeavors, numerous qualities, measurable values, or parameters exist. To identify color accurately more than one characteristic, and often three values, are used. No single value satisfactorily defines color. Although extensive collections of colors of non-skin objects, particularly fabrics, for each skin color category have been determined visually, there remains a need to quickly and reliably identify new colors as compatible with one or more skin color categories. Prior to this invention, no color characteristics have been identified or developed to permit this. Various aspects of the invention are defined in the independent claims. Some preferred features are defined in the dependent claims. By this invention skin coloration is accurately measured in a consistent, repeatable fashion on the basis of blue and yellow undertones in any person's skin color, utilizing a known color evaluation device and calculating a single parameter dependent on the blue and yellow content. Recognition of skin color exclusively as the determinative factor in arriving at personal color categorization, then the further recognition of the blue and yellow undertones as the controlling characteristic, to the exclusion of other color measurements, contrary to the popular techniques and writings, were significant steps toward the establishment of a scientifically sound and readily reproducible personal color assessment method. In the method according to the invention, a colour measuring device is used to develop the necessary measurements to calculate the Hunter b value. That calculation is effected, and the value thus determined is compared with preselected ranges of this b value that have been established empirically on the basis of analyses of thousands of test subjects to arrive at one of several categories of skin coloration corresponding to one of the preselected b value ranges. The instrument according to the invention incorporates the color measuring device, a microprocessor or other central processing unit (CPU), and memory storing the preselected ranges of b values that correspond to skin color categories. The central processing unit calculates the Hunter b value using the color coordinates or values measured by the measuring device. The CPU then compares the derived Hunter b value with the stored ranges to produce an output indicative of a particular category. In the embodiment of the method and apparatus according to the invention that is described herein specifically, the categories are four in number and preselected colors of fabric, cosmetics, hair colorants, and the like are assigned to each based upon its predetermined harmonious or aesthetically pleasing appearance when used in relation to a skin color in the particular category. The invention can be practiced with many more or fewer categories of skin color. As the invention is practiced with more numerous skin color categories, very narrow ranges of skin coloration can be identified as compatible with products of a particular color. The Hunter b value utilized to arrive at skin color categories that are repeatable and useful in like is one of three Hunter values, L, a, and b. Like other sets of color values, these are used, always in conjunction with one another, to define a color. Many other color character defining coordinates and values are known and are in use. These have been evaluated in the attempt to identify or develop a measurement or calculated value that will enable competent, reproducible, and scientifically valid assignment of categories. For example, the tri-stimulus calorimeter is used as the color measuring device in preferred embodiments of the method and instrument according to this invention. Starting with the measured standard CIE (Commission Internationale de l'Éclairage) tri-stimulus values X, Y and Z, certain calorimeters that are commercially available devices, with some computation capacity of their own, produce three well known coordinates, Y, x and y. These are standard color measurements established by the CIE and adopted by the ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). Neither the three tri-stimulus values X, Y and Z nor the additionally produced x and y values, alone or in combination, will suffice to permit acceptable categorization of skin color in the desired manner. Either set of three values, X, Y and Z, or Y, x and y, are, however, adequate to permit calculation of the Hunter b value. Certain commercial calorimeters are equipped with sufficient calculating capacity to develop the Hunter values L, a and b. If not, then the calculation of b is effected by the CPU of the invention. It is only necessary that an instrument be capable of measuring the values required to calculate the Hunter b value. In a preferred practice of the method according to the invention, multiple tri-stimulus calorimeter readings are taken and averaged by the CPU for a more accurate Hunter b value calculation. Typically, an individual person's cheek, free of makeup, is the site of the measurement. However, the back of the person's hand or another area can be measured, but some shifting of the categories then may result. For example, when the back of the hand is the measurement site, the presence and clear visibility of numerous blood vessels shifts the ranges of Hunter b values that correspond to the skin color categories. Good repeatability has been demonstrated by the skin color category identifying method and instrument of this invention and the category determination is made without resorting to eye color, hair color, or race. Insofar as race is concerned, the methods and apparatus of the invention have established among black people tested a wide range of colors, in all of the categories of skin color described herein. This is completely contrary to prior writings erroneously assigning black subjects to a single, subjective category and clearly evidencing a lack of recognition of the color characteristics distinguishing individuals. In short, the recognition of the single measurable quantity, Hunter b, as the distinguishing feature on which skin color differentiation could be based departed significantly from the ordinary color identification on the basis of several parameters and departed entirely from any earlier approach to skin color classification. Extensive collections of fabric colors, called swatch packs, have been assembled that are compatible with the skin color categories. Determination of the color defining features that establish compatible colors is not as straightforward as the precise measurement of skin color category discussed above. For fabrics and other non-skin matter other than cosmetics, the color characteristics that appear to determine whether or not a particular non-skin color will be compatible with a particular skin color category vary from one color family to another. By "color family" is meant the broad designation of color, e.g., yellow, red, blue, green and so on. The Hunter b value appears to be determinative of categories of compatibility for the color families yellow, gold, orange, red and white. Three new characteristics, Hunter hue angle h H , Hunter chroma c H , and Hunter saturation S H , were developed for and appear to work satisfactorily for identifying compatible categories from the color families beige, brown, pink, purple, blue, green, grey and black. These developed characteristics are used alone, together with Hunter b, in combination, or with the Hunter lightness value L to sort these families into colors that are identified with the skin color categories with which they are compatible. Cosmetic colors differ from other non-skin matter in their skin color compatibility characteristics. In cosmetics, particular colors in the various color families can be categorized for skin color compatibility based on their Hunter b values. However, with some color families only two ranges of this characteristic can be identified, necessary to accommodate varying degrees of skin darkness. Beige and brown foundation cosmetics need to take into account skin darkness as well as the yellow and blue content and a system for achieving this is presented below. The color characteristics of non-skin matter that establish compatibility categories of skin coloration can also be used to formulate new colors for products such as cosmetics, fabrics, etc. By altering the content of standard blue or yellow coloring agents such as dyes, pigments or other colorants, the color of non-skin matter can be adjusted to be compatible with a desired skin color category. This is done by altering the formulation sufficiently for an item or substance of a particular color family to bring the relevant characteristic or characteristics into a range previously identified as defining colors of that family compatible with the desired skin color category, without changing other characteristics of the color. The above and further advantages of this invention will be better understood with reference to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments taken in combination with the attached drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a block diagram illustration of an instrument for determining Hunter b value based on tri-stimulus calorimeter development of Y, x, y and determination of one of several skin coloration categories having b value ranges held in memory. Figure 2 is a schematic illustration in block diagram form illustrating the steps in the method of arriving at skin color category. Figure 3 is a schematic illustration in block diagram form illustrating the steps in the method of arriving at compatibility with skin color category or categories of the color of non-skin objects. Figure 4 is an illustration of a product color chart with product color representations brought together into regions associated with designations of skin color compatibility. Figure 5 is a perspective view illustrating a swatch pack of fabric samples that are assembled together for their compatibility with one of a number of skin color classifications. Figure 6 is an illustration of a foundation cosmetic product color chart with beige and brown product color representations arranged for skin color compatibility as well as for skin darkness that must be taken into account. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Any modern version of two general types of colormeasuring instruments is suitable for the skin color measurement according to this invention. The basic components of either type of instrument are a light source, a sample illumination and viewing arrangement, a means of selecting certain wavelengths of light for the measurement, a detector of the light reflected from the sample, and some relatively simple computing capacity. The main purposes of the computing capacity are to store and apply calibration information and to calculate various color coordinates for later use. In Figure 1, a color measuring instrument 10 is illustrated. An individual person's skin 11 is illuminated by the instrument as generally indicated by the broken line arrow 12 and the instrument receives illumination reflected from the skin 11 as generally indicated by the broken line arrow 13. Based on the illumination received by reflection from the skin the instrument 10 develops the coordinates Y, x and y. In Figure 1 the instrument 10 is a calorimeter, commercially available and suitable for development of the values Y, x, and y. Alternatively, the other type of instrument that can be used in the skin color categorization method according to this invention is the spectrophotometer that derives tri-stimulus values, from which can be computed the color values used to establish category of skin color as discussed below. Important to the use of a commercial calorimeter of the kind employed for the color measurement instrument 10 of Figure 1 is the calibration of the instrument using a standard. In the early development of this application, the "Light Skin" sample from the Macbeth Color Checker, described in the publication of C.S. McCamy, H. Marcus, and J.G. Davidson, "A Color-Rendition Chart," J. Appl. Photogr. Eng. 2, 95-99 (1976) was used. A tile of this approximate color was selected for its greater durability as an instrument standard. It was found, however, that the use of not adequately avoid the phenomenon known as metamerism, by which objects that look alike (have the same perceived color) under some kinds of light sources or to some observers do not match under other types of light sources or to other observers. By this phenomenon calorimeters may not read their colors the same as the average human observer would under the daylight type light source usually employed for visual observation, hence leading to an error in calorimeter calibration. As an improved primary standard, the skin of a subject whose skin color measurements were highly reproducible and in the approximate center of the range of skin colors of the human population was selected. The spectral reflectance factors of the skin of this subject were carefully measured on a Macbeth 1500 Plus spectrophotometer (Macbeth, Newburgh, New York); these data are given in column 2 of Table II at the wavelengths listed in column 1. By using well-established techniques of computer color matching, carried out on an ACS 1800 system equipped with an ACS SpectroSensor II color measuring instrument (Applied Color Systems, Princeton, New Jersey) a colorant formulation matching this skin color was developed. The spectral reflectance factors for this match are given in column 3 of Table II. It may be seen that the data closely match those of column 2, indicating the absence of metamerism. Calculations according to the CIE 1976 CIELAB system showed that the two data sets match to within 0.27-0.36 units, less than can be perceived by human color vision, for daylight, incandescent light, and cool white fluorescent light, the three most commonly used light sources for the proposed applications. The above-mentioned formulation was made up in a stable, durable material, and tiles were prepared as instrument standards. The spectral reflectance factors of one of these tiles are given in column 4 of Table II. It was found, however, that the improvement in calibration resulted in color coordinates that were significantly different from those obtained in the many studies made with the earlier system. A decision was made to adjust the calibration values of the new tiles in order to achieve consistent results between the new and old methods of calibration. Column 5 of Table II gives the adjusted set of spectral reflectance factors for the tile of column 4. The CIE and Hunter color coordinates, for measurement with the specular component excluded and calculated for CIE standard illuminant C and the 1931 2° CIE standard observer, are also tabulated for each of the samples in the table. With a suitable standard, basically, calibration is carried out by forcing the calorimeter 10 to give the desired color coordinates Y, x and y mentioned above, while utilizing the calorimeter with the standard tile chosen. The method of calibration is known for particular instruments and follows a series of steps prescribed by the manufacturer that need not be detailed here. With the instrument correctly calibrated, the measuring head or instrument orifice is placed against the specimen to be measured. In a preferred approach, the instrument head is pressed against the makeup-free cheek of assessed. In a calorimeter of the type shown in Figure 1 at block 10 the instrument has an internal microprocessor or other computing capability so that it is able to develop the color coordinates Y, x and y from the measured values X, Y and Z (Y being the same in each case). Certain calorimeters develop the Hunter color coordinates L, a, b, of which the coordinate b figures prominently in the skin color categorization of the invention as explained below. Since the degree of computation that the color measuring device 10 (i.e. calorimeter or spectrophotometer) internally performs varies, the manner of calculating the Hunter values from the tri-stimulus coordinates is useful to an understanding and practice of the invention and will enable correct use of a CPU by appropriate calculation to perform the invention with any commercially available calorimeter or spectrophotometer. Most modern color measuring instruments begin with measurement of the tri-stimulus values X, Y, and Z. From these can be derived the CIE chromaticity coordinates x and y: x = X / (X + Y + Z) y = Y / (X + Y + Z) The instrument 10 of Figure 1 outputs the triplet of values x, y and Y as the starting point for further calculations by a central processing unit which can be a microprocessor or personal computer 15. The remaining two tri-stimulus values X and Z are available by computation as follows: X = xY/y, and Z = (1-x-y)Y/y The CPU can thus develop the Hunter value b discovered in accordance with this invention to be the most useful color Hunter value is one of three values derived by Richard S. Hunter in 1958. Richard S. Hunter, "Photoelectric Color Difference Meter", J. Opt. Soc. Am. 48, 985-995 (1958). The equations for these are: L = 10 (Y) 1/2 a = 17.5 (1.02 X - Y) / Y 1/2 b = 7.0 (Y - 0.847 Z) / Y 1/2 where L is a lightness coordinate whose values correlate better with the visual perceptions of the lightness of object colors than do values of Y; a is a coordinate denoting redness or greenness, for which positive values denote that the color is red rather than green, and negative values the opposite; and b is a yellowness-blueness coordinate, for which positive values denote that the color is yellow rather than blue, and negative values the opposite. For yellow colors, starting with a = b = 0 and an appropriate high value of L, which would be a light grey, increasing positive values of b result in a series of colors that may be described as light yellowish grey, pale yellow, light yellow, brilliant yellow, and vivid yellow, in turn. Thus b is a measure of the "intensity" of the yellow color. Ordinarily, all three Hunter values are utilized to describe a color. However, for the purpose of skin color categorization, particularly as used to identify categories of skin coloration compatible with previously identified series of colors as may be useful in selecting clothing and the like, it was discovered by the inventor that the Hunter value b alone was most useful to provide a reliable measure of the categories of skin coloration best suited to that the yellow undertone of the color of human skin. It should be pointed out that other measures of the yellowness of colors, including those standardized by the CIE, namely, b*, v, and v*, and by the ASTM, including the Yellowness Index of Method D 1925, are not satisfactory in the same way as Hunter b for the purposes stated above. Thus, in the particular arrangement of Figure 1, wherein the calorimeter 10 produces the values Y, x, y, the computer 15 derives the Hunter value b. Clearly, development of Hunter b, for use in this invention can be accomplished by an instrument that measures just the required variables Y and Z of equation (7). Y is a function, well known in the science of color, that measures the yellow content, as well as the lightness, of a color. It has maximum weighting in the yellow to red region of the spectrum (i.e., the region extending from the green side of purest yellow in the spectrum into red). Z is a function, also well known in the science of color, that measures the blue content of the color, with maximum weighting in the blue region of the spectrum. Together these factors, or others like them, can be used to calculate a yellow-blue factor as typified by equation (7) defining Hunter's b. The equations (5) and (7) make it clear that Hunter's b is not independent of lightness. L, the Hunter lightness coordinate, is 10 (Y) 1/2 and is a measure of the lightness of color, i.e., luminous reflectance. Hunter's b is weighted by this coordinate, as follows: b = 7.0 (Y-0.847Z) Y 1/2 b = 70 (Y-0.847Z) 10Y 1/2 or b = 70 (Y-0.847Z) L So the Hunter value b can be described as a yellow-blue factor consisting of the difference between (1) a function measuring the yellow content of the color and (2) a function measuring the blue content of the color, the difference being suitably weighted by (3) a term that is a function of the lightness (luminous reflectance) of the color, the function measuring the yellow content having maximum weighting in what is substantially the yellow to red region of the spectrum and the function measuring the blue content of the color having maximum weighting in what is substantially the blue region of the spectrum. For greater accuracy, multiple Y, x and y readings can be made with the calorimeter 10 as suggested in the steps of the method outlined in Figure 2, in which case the computer 15 simply averages the values Y, x, y for greater accuracy in the calculation of b. With the b value of the color of the skin 11 now available, the CPU 15 compares that with predetermined ranges of b values empirically identified with categories of skin coloration and stored in memory 17. This division of the total range of b values into individual ranges that define skin color categories was quite different from the use of multiple values to define color and proved surprisingly repeatable and accurate. Assignments of category based on measurement and b value calculation agree with visual assessments. The ranges of b values corresponding to, for example, four skin color categories are stored in the memory 17. For cheek measurement, based on assessments of thousands of individuals, the boundaries between the four ranges appear to be at substantially 11.2, 12.7 and 14.3. Some shifting of the ranges of b value occurs in dependence on the location of the skin where assessment occurs. For example, utilizing the back of the subject's hand, boundaries between the exemplary four ranges appear to occur at 9.8, 11.0 and 12.1. This is believed to be a function of the number and visibility of blood vessels at that location. In either case the lowermost range, that of category I, consists of b values below the lowest boundary value. The next higher range, that of category II, is between that lowest boundary value and the next higher boundary value, which is the middle value. The next range, that of category III, is from the middle value to the highest boundary value, and the fourth and highest range, that of category IV, consists of all b values above the highest dividing value. As for the assignment of particular colors of fabric and the like to categories compatible with the four skin color categories, the following colors, identified by CIE Y, x, y values have been identified and categorized. In the following tabulation of fabric colors, color category I is the category compatible with skin category I, corresponding to the lowest Hunter b value range of skin measurement (i.e. below about 11.2, cheek measurement), color category II represents compatibility with the next higher skin color category II (from about 11.2 to 12.7, cheek measurement), color category III represents colors compatible with the to 14.3, cheek measurement), and color category IV represents compatibility with the highest category IV of skin color (above about 14.3, cheek measurement). Y x y Category Yellow Color Family 71.2 0.339 0.363 I 73.8 0.344 0.375 II 71.6 0.386 0.433 III 60.5 0.441 0.465 IV 30.9 0.481 0.438 III 23.5 0.471 0.410 III Orange Color Family 22.7 0.543 0.367 III 46.1 0.443 0.407 IV 42.9 0.438 0.404 IV 31.1 0.491 0.415 IV 33.6 0.544 0.402 IV 14.2 0.520 0.362 III 9.9 0.481 0.366 III 24.9 0.529 0.364 III Red Color Family 8.0 0.495 0.297 I 7.3 0.526 0.304 II 20.2 0.429 0.327 II 9.6 0.451 0.284 I 5.0 0.460 0.294 I 3.6 0.469 0.302 I 45.3 0.574 0.344 IV 13.9 0.554 0.335 III 11.4 0.567 0.328 III 17.0 0.575 0.344 IV Beige Color Family 57.2 0.376 0.390 IV 43.7 0.370 0.380 IV 57.2 0.378 0.391 IV 55.6 0.358 0.372 III 31.8 0.370 0.380 IV 37.2 0.361 0.377 IV 56.9 0.348 0.359 II Brown Color Family 2.3 0.355 0.325 I 20.3 0.354 0.351 II 5.8 0.359 0.345 II 7.6 0.362 0.350 II 39.6 0.396 0.386 IV 21.9 0.391 0.374 IV 22.3 0.402 0.385 IV 4.5 0.394 0.349 II 4.0 0.420 0.351 II 7.5 0.402 0.371 II Pink Color Family 43.7 0.393 0.285 I 22.7 0.437 0.288 I 19.8 0.422 0.283 I 14.0 0.381 0.319 II 33.8 0.363 0.333 II 57.8 0.357 0.302 II 47.6 0.369 0.313 II 25.7 0.384 0.302 II 38.3 0.355 0.314 II 9.2 0.433 0.256 I 26.9 0.374 0.332 II 41.4 0.465 0.380 IV 44.9 0.408 0.350 III 45.2 0.393 0.366 IV 47.4 0.383 0.375 IV 26.0 0.463 0.341 III 37.3 0.419 0.381 IV 23.7 0.473 0.359 III Purple Color Family 5.5 0.282 0.200 III 4.4 0.277 0.205 III 12.2 0.292 0.236 III 33.0 0.288 0.266 II 9.4 0.285 0.209 I 40.1 0.322 0.286 IV 15.5 0.355 0.241 IV 3.3 0.285 0.247 III 11.3 0.260 0.232 II Blue Color Family 61.5 0.301 0.320 IV 18.0 0.245 0.242 I 9.0 0.226 0.222 I 4.2 0.237 0.223 I 2.3 0.278 0.260 II 47.1 0.281 0.300 II 38.4 0.264 0.289 II 26.8 0.247 0.257 II 21.6 0.248 0.248 I 10.6 0.271 0.279 II 5.4 0.267 0.266 II 8.3 0.253 0.267 II 3.6 0.240 0.254 II 4.9 0.258 0.249 I 35.4 0.229 0.288 III 26.9 0.233 0.259 II 7.6 0.193 0.187 I 38.0 0.266 0.309 IV 23.1 0.240 0.330 IV 10.3 0.216 0.281 III Green Color Family 15.8 0.255 0.433 III 5.0 0.256 0.356 I 48.3 0.303 0.398 II 47.4 0.282 0.371 II 25.1 0.252 0.397 II 52.2 0.337 0.478 IV 54.2 0.328 0.432 III 59.0 0.336 0.416 III 15.3 0.364 0.425 III 18.5 0.275 0.362 II 13.1 0.269 0.437 III 3.4 0.275 0.337 I White Color Family 67.9 0.334 0.351 IV 73.0 0.313 0.329 I 74.1 0.332 0.352 IV Grey Color Family 44.7 0.314 0.329 I 45.1 0.317 0.329 I 42.6 0.311 0.332 II 32.6 0.313 0.328 I 16.1 0.315 0.329 I 52.6 0.313 0.333 II 55.5 0.313 0.327 I Black Color Family 4.3 0.291 0.290 I 2.7 0.285 0.275 I 2.1 0.299 0.295 I 3.3 0.298 0.312 I 3.6 0.308 0.316 I Spectral Reflectances And Color Coordinates Wavelength, nm Skin standard Formulation Tile, correct Tile, adjusted 400 19.03 20.70 21.51 16.67 420 18.96 20.69 21.10 16.93 440 21.53 21.68 20.99 17.65 460 25.35 24.43 23.27 20.56 480 28.06 28.30 27.82 25.67 500 30.13 30.77 29.03 27.94 520 31.19 31.31 29.38 28.24 540 30.01 30.84 28.48 27.59 560 31.41 30.76 28.22 27.33 580 32.85 34.01 31.49 30.12 600 44.37 43.54 42.58 40.52 620 51.24 51.57 51.27 47.93 640 54.56 55.09 55.56 51.10 660 57.09 57.60 59.22 53.82 680 58.67 60.41 61.82 56.55 700 59.95 62.69 63.93 58.87 X 37.14 37.28 36.14 33.76 Y 34.66 34.89 33.07 31.53 Z 28.50 28.54 27.63 24.20 x 0.3703 0.3702 0.3732 0.3732 y 0.3456 0.3464 0.3415 0.3523 L 58.87 59.07 57.51 56.15 a 9.31 9.02 11.54 9.05 b 12.51 12.70 11.77 13.75 From the fabric colors studied, the 117 colors of Table I, it appears that characteristics of colors compatible with the four skin color categories identified above can be identified. From these instrumentally derived color coordinates, rules were derived for obtaining compatible skin color categories that agree with the categories assigned subjectively by those skilled in the art. It has been found that Hunter b is also satisfactory for assigning compatible skin color categories to a wider range of colors than just those of the skin, as long as these colors are in the color families described by the common terms yellow, gold, orange, red, or white. For colors of fabric or other types of objects (excluding skin and cosmetics) in families other than yellow, gold, orange, red and white, b alone does not provide enough information to assign compatible categories correctly, nor do any of the other color coordinates defined by the CIE or otherwise described in the literature. Several new color coordinates were therefore devised and found suitable for this purpose. They are modifications of the Hunter L, a, and b coordinates, based by analogy on similar coordinates defined by the CIE in 1976. They are: Hunter hue angle h H : h H = tan -1 (b/a) where tan -1 stands for the arctangent function; Hunter chroma C H : C H = (a 2 + b 2 ) 1/2 Hunter saturation s H S H = 100 C H /L (where the factor of 100 has been introduced to make the range of numerical values of s H the same order of magnitude Hue angle is a measure, in degrees, of the position of the color in the familiar hue circle, whose major color families are, in order, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and purple. In the Hunter and CIE systems, these are arranged in counterclockwise order starting with red on the right, with Hunter hue angles from near zero to about 30°. Oranges have h H between 30 and 60°, yellows up to about 120°, greens to about 180°, blues to about 300°, and purples between 300 and 360° (which is the same as 0°). Chroma is a measure of the "intensity" of a color that is valid for any color family in the same way that Hunter b is for the pure yellow colors described above. Chroma can be thought of as the distance, on a color chart, between the color in question and a grey of the same lightness. Saturation is similar to chroma in that it describes the "intensity" of color, but it is modified to account for the effect of changing lightness on this perception. Purists in colorimetry would say that saturation should not be defined in the Hunter system, but it has been found to be a useful concept even if it does not meet the strict mathematical criteria of the CIE definition. In the following, for non-skin matter other than cosmetics, the characteristics that appear to lead to compatibility are described for each color family represented in the colors studied; all major families are included. Again the exemplary four category system is used. The discussion applies to colored objects that are not fluorescent. Fluorescence may result in departure from the first briefly described, and the rules for assigning color categories are then presented for that family. The discussion starts with the yellow family and proceeds clockwise around the color circle so as to start with simple cases and progress to more complex ones. The fabric colors have been grouped into categories (I - IV) that correspond to the categories of skin color with which they are compatible. Yellow The family of yellow colors, including golds, is categorized by use of the Hunter coordinate b. The limits on b for the various categories are: I - b less than 19 II - b between 19 and 25 III - b between 25 and 40 IV - b greater than 40. Orange The orange family is limited to light colors of relatively high chroma, as lower chroma colors are recognized as beige, if light, or brown, if dark. There are only categories III and IV represented in the orange family. Hunter b suffices to categorize these colors: III - b less than 28 IV - b greater than 28. Red Despite the fact that these colors deviate markedly from the yellow-blue axis of Hunter space by having positive values of a, the coordinate b still suffices to categorize them: I - b less than 9 II - b between 9 and 15 III - b between 15 and 20 IV - b greater than 20. Beige This family includes light colors with lower saturation or chroma than the yellows. Their hue angles are near 95°. There are no category I colors in this family. The beiges are categorized by Hunter saturation s H as follows: II - s H less than 25 III - s H between 25 and 28 IV - s H greater than 28. Brown The brown family is slightly redder and significantly darker than the beige. Its hue angle is near 60°. It is best categorized by Hunter chroma C H , as follows: I - c H less than 5 II - c H between 5 and 9.5 III - c H between 9.5 and 12 IV - c H greater than 12. Pink This color family is difficult to categorize because it includes both yellowish pinks (peaches) and purplish pinks. These two may be distinguished by different ranges of Hunter b. The yellowish pinks include the category III and category IV colors, and these are separated by their different lightness levels. The purplish pinks include the category II and category I colors, and these are separated I - b less than 15 and s H greater than 60 II - b less than 15 and s H less than 60 III - b greater than 15 and L less than 60 IV - b greater than 15 and L greater than 60. Purple This color family encompasses a wide range of hue angles. Both this quantity and the saturation s H must be considered to define the categories involved. The rules are: I - s H less than 70 and h H less than 320° II - s H between 50 and 70 and h H less than 320° III - s H between 50 and 60 if h H less than 320° and s H greater than 50 if h H greater than 320° IV - s H less than 50, with no restriction on h H . Blue The colors in the blue family cover a wide range of hue angles, and this quantity has a major effect on their category. Together with restrictions on Hunter b, they can be categorized as follows. Note that values of Hunter b are negative, characteristic of blue rather than yellow colors. In this context, "less than" means more negative and "greater than" means less negative. The rules are: I - b less than -10 and h H greater than 270° II - b greater than -10 for h H greater than 270° and b less than - 8.5 for h H between 270° and 230° III - b less than -8 and h H between 230° and 210° IV - b greater than -8 and h H less than 210°. Green The green family is also complex, including both this family, a variety of color coordinates must be specified: I - h H greater than 170° II - h H between 140° and 170° and s H less than 70 III - s H greater than 70 for h H greater than 140°; no restriction on s H for h H less than 140° IV - b greater than 30. White Although white fabric colors of category I exist, with values of Hunter b less than approximately 5, none was included among the samples tested. Likewise, the limits for categories III and IV are not fully defined. Tentative limits are: I - b less than 5 II - b between 5 and 10 III or IV - b greater than 10. Grey This family consists of relatively light greys, all falling in categories I or II. They are best differentiated by saturation, which is always quite small for these near-neutral colors: I - s H less than 8 II - s H greater than 8. Black All blacks, which include very dark greys, are in the category I. The family can be defined by upper limits on its saturation and lightness: I - s H less than 30 and L less than 25. Cosmetics In a similar study of cosmetic colors, the same exemplary four color categories were used. Again, the characteristics of colors compatible with these skin color categories can be identified and rules can be derived from the instrumentally measured color coordinates for obtaining compatible skin color categories that agree with the categories assigned subjectively by those skilled in the art. In the following, the categories that lead to compatibility for cosmetic colors are given for the same color families described above. The same limitation to nonfluorescent colors applies. For cosmetic colors, the characteristic Hunter b suffices to establish the major boundary separating categories I and II from categories III and IV. In most color families, for cosmetic colors, it is desirable to define the remaining two boundaries, between categories I and II and between categories III and IV, in an overlapping fashion to allow for the effect of widely differing skin colors. The second color family considered, Red and orange, provides an example of this practice. Yellow The small number of cosmetics in the yellow color family, which also includes golds and related colors, allows establishment of the major boundary separating categories I and II from categories III and IV at b = 12.5, but does not allow estimation of the boundaries between categories I and II and between categories III and IV. Red and Orange It is expedient to consider these two colors as a single color family. For these colors, the major boundary separating categories I and II from categories III and IV occurs at b = 9.5. The boundary between categories I and II normally occurs at b = 5.0, but when considering many of the darker skin colors, for example, the upper boundary of category I can be higher as required, but cannot exceed the upper boundary of category II, b = 9.5. Similarly, the boundary between categories III and IV normally occurs at b = 12.8, but when considering skin colors of many persons of a Hispanic background, for example, the upper boundary of category III can be higher as required. These statements can be summarized by the following mathematical equations: I - b ≤ 9.5 II - 5.0 < b ≤ 9.5 III - b > 9.5 IV - b ≥ 12.8. where the signs < ("less than"), ≤ ("less than or equal to"), > ("greater than"), and ≥ ("greater than or equal to"), have their usual mathematical meanings. This abbreviated form of the description is used where appropriate in the following descriptions of color families and their categories. Beige and Brown It is convenient to combine these two similar color families. The categories are described by the following values of Hunter b: I - b ≤ 7.6 III - b > 7.6 IV - b ≥ 9.6. Pink This color family includes such colors as peach. The categories are described by the following values of Hunter b: I - b ≤ 9.5 II - -2.4 < b ≤ 9.5 III - b > 9.5 IV - b ≥ 11.8. Purple Included in the purple family are violet, lavender, and similar colors. The majority of these colors fall in categories I and II. The description of these categories in terms of Hunter b is as follows: I - b ≤ 5.6 II - -14.5 < b ≤ 5.6. An exceptional case occurs, for reasons not now known to us, when for a color in this family Hunter L ≤ 30, a ≤ 10, and b ≤ -25. In such a case, visual inspection shows that the color is compatible with skin colors in category III. Blue The category boundaries for this color family in terms of Hunter b are as follows: I - b ≤ -14.5 II - -18.8 < b ≤ -14.5 III - b > -14.5 IV - b ≥ -1.8. Green The category boundaries for this color family can be established in terms of Hunter b as follows: I - b ≤ -1.8 II - -3.1 < b ≤ -1.8 III - b > 1.8 IV - b ≥ 4.9. White The very small number of white cosmetics allows only the definition of the major boundary separating categories I and II from categories III and IV. This occurs at Hunter b = 6.0. Grey Grey cosmetics are all in categories I or II, with Hunter b < 1.0. It is not possible to define the boundary between these categories. Black As with the grey family, the black cosmetics are all in categories I and II, with Hunter b < 0. It is not possible to establish the boundary between these categories. Foundation Colors The above rules apply to all cosmetic colors except for the brown or beige foundation colors. The selection of these colors depends not only on Hunter b, but also on the lightness of the skin color to which the foundation is to be applied, as measured by Hunter L, according to the following: Dark skin, L < 40 Medium dark skin, L < 50 Light skin, L ≥ 59. Within these skin-lightness categories, it is possible to establish the boundary separating categories I and II from categories III and IV at the following values of Hunter b: Dark skin, b = 12.0 Medium dark skin, b = 12.3 Medium skin, b=12.5 Light skin, b=12.8. An instrument, having the same general configuration as that of Figure 1, for carrying out this process can make the initial choice of family (via software) based on measurement, or can have family designation input by the operator to control the subsequent measuring, calculating, comparing and assigning steps effected by easily accomplished programming choosing comparison subroutines based on color family either input manually or measured. The necessary measurements are made and calculations of the appropriate characteristics are carried out by the CPU. Comparison with stored ranges of characteristics for the identified family are made and a category (or categories) I - IV is assigned signifying compatibility with a like-identified skin color category. When new product colors are formulated, the foregoing measurable characteristics can be used to arrive at colors compatible with each category of skin coloration. A particular color family can thus be represented for each category of skin coloration. In clothing, cosmetics, and accessories each prospective consumer can be assured of a Similar product colors can also be made available to persons of differing skin color categories. For each color family the correction of a particular color to bring it into one or another of the categories that correspond to skin color categories can be achieved by altering the formulation. In other words, adding or subtracting blue or yellow can move a product's classification to a desired category. In the art, correction of blue or yellow is achieved by appropriate adjustment of a blue or yellow content adjusting colorant of the original formulation. Repeated measurements of the parameters identified above for the various color families will confirm proper color correction for a particular classification or will indicate the need for additional correction. Correct representation of colors of products in printed advertising can be achieved in this way and printed color charts accurately reproducing product colors for such products as apparel and cosmetics can be achieved, whereas previously printed representations of product colors were very often inaccurate. Color charts can be accurately assembled for other than cosmetics and for cosmetics. As indicated by the chart 20 in Fig. 4, product colors gathered together in association with their compatible skin color categories can be accurately assembled by adjusting color representations 22 associated with each skin color category designation 24 in conformance with the ranges described above for each color family. Of course, each product color representation 22 can be labeled by a color designating product color name or number. For cosmetics and for products other than four classifications of skin coloration as described above. Shown in Fig. 5, swatch packs 30 of colored fabric samples 32, correctly colored for a particular skin coloration, should gather together samples with fabric colorings as established above. Similarly, beige and brown foundation colors are assembled and classified, either on the same cosmetic color charts, or on separate charts, based on skin darkness as well as skin color classification, again as described above. In Fig. 6, two regions 40 and 42 of a foundation cosmetic color chart 44 are broken down by skin darkness categories 45 based on the Hunter L values described above. The chips or representations 47 accurately portraying the brown and beige foundation colors are then formulated and arranged to accurately identify the classifications of these products. The above specific preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrative and may be modified as will be readily understood by those skilled in the art without departure from the scope of the invention, as set out in the appended claims.

Claims: A process of making a color chart or a swatch pack, having representations of colors assigned for compatibility to at least one category of a plurality of categories of skin coloration, characterized by the steps of: (a) providing said at least one category of a plurality of categories of skin coloration based exclusively upon skin color content in the bluer to yellower regions of a spectrum as established by a color factor in the skin coloration, said factor comprising a first function weighted in a yellower portion of the spectrum, a second function weighted in the blue portion of the spectrum and a term that is a function of the lightness of the color, and (b) assigning at least one of said color representations to at least one category of said plurality of categories of skin coloration based upon a measured color characteristic predetermined to establish compatibility of the color representation to said at least one category, said color characteristic being dependent at least in part on lightness. A process according to claim 1, including providing at least one category of skin coloration of a plurality of categories of skin coloration having at least one boundary value of said color factor between bluer and yellower regions of skin coloration as defined by ranges of values of said color factor defining the plurality of categories. A process according to claim 1, wherein the representations of colors are assigned for compatibility to a plurality of categories of skin coloration that are determined without reference to race. A process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the colour factor is substantially that of Hunter b. A process according to claim 4 when dependent on claim 2, wherein said at least one boundary value is within a range of values of Hunter b from substantially 11.0 to 12.7, dependent upon the physical location on an individual person where skin color is measured. A process according to claim 4 when dependent on claim 2, wherein providing said categories of skin coloration includes establishing four categories of skin coloration having boundaries at Hunter b values of substantially 11.2, 12.7, and 14.3, that represent the boundaries of categories of skin color measured at the cheek. A process according to claim 4 when dependent on claim 2, wherein providing said categories of skin coloration includes establishing four categories of skin coloration having boundaries at Hunter b values of substantially 9.8, 11.0, and 12.1 that represent the boundaries of categories of skin color measured at the back of the hand. A process according to any of the preceding claims wherein the color characteristic is a blue or yellow content color characteristic. A process according to claim 8, wherein the color characteristic is selected from a group consisting of Hunter b, Hunter chroma C H , Hunter saturation s H and Hunter hue angle h H . A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the representations of colors of non-skin matter include representations that are blue, green, beige, white, grey or black. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said color characteristic of the color representations is adjustable for skin color compatibility by a blue or yellow content colorant. A color chart bearing representations of colors of non-skin matter, said chart having at least one region thereon identified solely by a skin coloration category based exclusively upon skin color content in the bluer and yellower regions of the spectrum, as established by the value of a color factor in the skin coloration, said color factor comprising a first function weighted in a yellower portion of the spectrum, a second function weighted in the blue portion of the spectrum and a term that is a function of the lightness of a color, a plurality of non-skin color representations in the at least one region, each color representation in the at least one region having at least one measured color characteristic predetermined to establish compatibility with skin color of the associated skin coloration category, said measured color characteristic being dependent at least in part on lightness. A color chart according to claim 12, wherein said at least one region comprises a plurality of regions that are identified solely by skin coloration categories based on skin color content in said bluer and yellower regions of the spectrum, the skin coloration categories being determined without reference to race. A color chart according to claim 12, wherein the color characteristic is a blue or yellow content color characteristic. A color chart according to claim 12, wherein said color characteristic is selected from the group consisting of Hunter b, Hunter chroma C H , Hunter saturation s H and Hunter hue angle h H . A color chart according to claim 12, wherein said non-skin color representations in the at least one region include representations of at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b less than 19, red with a Hunter b less than 9, brown with a Hunter chroma C H less than 5, pink with a Hunter b less than 15 and a Hunter saturation s H greater than 60, purple with a Hunter saturation s H less than 70 and a Hunter hue angle h H less than 320°, blue with a Hunter b less than -10 and a Hunter hue angle h H greater than 270°, green with a Hunter hue angle h H greater than 170°, white with a Hunter b less than 5, grey with a Hunter saturation s H less than 8, and black. A color chart according to claim 12, wherein said non-skin color representations in the at least one region including representations of at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b between 19 and 25, red with a Hunter b between 9 and 15, beige with a Hunter saturation s H less than 25, brown with a Hunter chroma C H between 5 and 9.5, pink with a Hunter b less than 15 and a Hunter saturation s H less than 60, purple with a Hunter saturation s H between 50 and 70 and a Hunter hue angle h H less than 320°, blue with a Hunter b greater than -10 for a Hunter hue angle h H greater than 270° and less than -8.5 for a Hunter hue angle h H between 270° and 230°, green with a Hunter hue angle h H between 140° and 170° and Hunter saturation s H less than 70, white with a Hunter b between 5 and 10, grey with a Hunter saturation s H greater than 8. A color chart according to claim 12, wherein said non-skin color representations in the at least one region including representations of at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b between 25 and 40, orange with a Hunter b less than 28, red with a Hunter b between 15 and 20, beige with a Hunter saturation s H between 25 and 28, brown with a Hunter chroma C H between 9.5 and 12, pink with a Hunter b greater than 15 and a Hunter L less than 60, purple with a Hunter saturation s H between 50 and 60 if Hunter hue angle s H is less than 320° and greater than 50 if Hunter hue angle h H is greater than 320°, blue with a Hunter b greater than -8 and a Hunter hue angle h H between 230° and 210°, green with a Hunter saturation s H greater than 70 for a Hunter hue angle h H greater than 140° and no restriction on Hunter saturation s H for Hunter hue angle h H less than 140°, white with a Hunter b greater than 10. A color chart according to claim 12, wherein said non-skin color representations in the at least one region including representations of at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b greater than 40, orange with a Hunter b greater than 28, red with a Hunter b greater than 20, beige with a Hunter saturation s H greater than 28, brown with a Hunter chroma C H greater than 12, pink with a Hunter b greater than 15 and a Hunter L greater than 60, purple with a Hunter saturation s H less than 50 and no color chart restriction on Hunter hue angle h H , blue with a Hunter b greater than -8 and a Hunter hue angle h H less than 210°, green with a Hunter b greater than 30, white with a Hunter b greater than 10. A color chart according to claim 12, wherein the color chart is a cosmetic color chart, and said non-skin color representations in the at least one region including cosmetic representations of at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b less or equal to 12.5, red with a Hunter b less than or equal to 9.5, orange with a Hunter b less than or equal to 9.5, beige with a Hunter b less than or equal to 7.6, brown with a Hunter b less than or equal to 7.6, pink with a Hunter b less than or equal to 9.5, purple with a Hunter b less than or equal to 5.6, blue with a Hunter b less than or equal to -14.5, green with a Hunter b less than or equal to -1.8, white with a Hunter b less than or equal to 6.0, grey with a Hunter b less than 1.0 and black with a Hunter b less than 0. A color chart according to claim 12, wherein the color chart is a cosmetic color chart, and said non-skin color representations in the at least one region including cosmetic representations of at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b less than or equal to 12.5, red with a Hunter b greater than 5.0 and less than or equal to 9.5, orange with a Hunter b greater than 5.0 and less than or equal to 9.5, beige with a Hunter b greater than 4.6 and less than or equal to 7.6, brown with a Hunter b greater than 4.6 and less than or equal to 7.6, pink with a Hunter b greater than -2.4 and less than or equal to 9.5, purple with a Hunter b greater than -14.5 and less than or equal to 5.6, blue with a Hunter b greater than -18.8 and less than or equal to -14.5, green with a Hunter b greater than -3.1 and less than or equal to -1.8, white with a Hunter b less than or equal to 6.0, grey with a Hunter b less than 1.0, and black with a Hunter b less than 0. A color chart according to claim 12, wherein the color chart being a cosmetic color chart, and said non-skin color representations in the at least one region including cosmetic representations of at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b greater than or equal to 12.5, red with a Hunter b greater than 9.5, orange with a Hunter b greater than 9.5, beige with a Hunter b greater than 7.6, brown with a Hunter b greater than 7.6, pink with a Hunter b greater than 9.5, purple with a Hunter L less than or equal to 30, a Hunter a less than or equal to 10 and a Hunter b less than or equal to -25, blue with a Hunter b greater than -14.5, green with a Hunter b greater than 1.8, and white with a Hunter b greater than 6.0. A color chart according to claim 12, wherein the color chart is a cosmetic color chart, and said non-skin color representations in the at least one region including cosmetic representations of at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b greater than or equal to 12.5, red with a Hunter b greater than or equal to 12.8, orange with a Hunter b greater than or equal to 12.8, beige with a Hunter b greater than or equal to 9.6, brown with a Hunter b greater than or equal to 9.6, pink with a Hunter b greater than or equal to 11.8, blue with a Hunter b greater than or equal to -1.8, green with a Hunter b greater than or equal to 4.9 and white with a Hunter b greater than or equal to 6. A color chart according to claim 12 or 20 or 21, wherein the at least one region includes at least one of the following cosmetic foundation colors: a brown or beige foundation color with a Hunter b less than or equal to 12.0 and designated for dark skin, a brown or beige foundation color with a Hunter b less than or equal to 12.3 designated for medium dark skin, a brown or beige foundation color with a Hunter b less than or equal to 12.5 designated for medium skin, and a brown or beige foundation color with a Hunter b less than or equal to 12.8 designated for light skin; where dark skin is skin with a Hunter L less than 40, medium dark skin is skin with a Hunter L less than 50, medium skin is skin with a Hunter L less than 59, and light skin is skin with a Hunter L greater than or equal to 59. A color chart according to claim 12 or 22 or 23, wherein the at least one region includes at least one of the following cosmetic foundation colors: a brown or beige foundation color with a Hunter b less than or equal to 12.0 and designated for dark skin, a brown or beige foundation color with a Hunter b less than or equal to 12.3 designated for medium dark skin, a brown or beige foundation color with a Hunter b less than or equal to 12.5 designated for medium skin, and a brown or beige foundation color with a Hunter b less than or equal to 12.8 designated for light skin; where dark skin is skin with a Hunter L less than 40, medium dark skin is skin with a Hunter L less than 50, medium skin is skin with a Hunter L less than 59, and light skin is skin with a Hunter L greater than or equal to 59. A color chart according to claim 12, wherein the color chart is a cosmetic foundation color chart, said chart having at least two regions associated with at least two skin color classifications and skin darkness designations based upon Hunter L values less than 40 for a dark skin designation, less than 50 for a medium dark skin designation, less than 59 for a medium skin designation, and greater than or equal to 59 for a light skin designation, and brown and beige color representations having Hunter b less than or equal to 12 for dark skin in one of the regions and Hunter b greater than 12 for the dark skin designation in another of the regions, Hunter b less than or equal to 12.3 for the medium dark skin designation in the one region, and Hunter b greater than 12.3 for the medium dark skin designation in the other region, Hunter b less than or equal to 12.5 for the medium skin designation in the one region and Hunter b greater than 12.5 for the medium skin designation in the other region, and Hunter b less than or equal to 12.8 for the light skin designation in the one region and Hunter b greater than 12.8 for the light skin designation in the other region. A color chart as claimed in claim 12, wherein said representations of colors of non-skin matter include representations that are blue, green, beige, white, grey, or black. A color chart as claimed in claim 12, wherein said color characteristic of the color representation is adjustable for skin color compatability by a blue or yellow content adjusting colorant. A swatch pack of fabric samples characterized by having assembled for association with one category of skin coloration based exclusively on skin color content in the bluer and yellower regions of the spectrum, as established by a value of a color factor comprising a first function weighted in a yellower portion of the spectrum, a second function weighted in the blue portion of the spectrum and a term that is a function of the lightness, a plurality of fabric colors including colors from at least a plurality of color families, yellow, red, brown, pink, purple, blue, green, white, grey and black, each fabric color of any one of said color families having at least one color factor value in a range of values of said color factor predetermined to determine color compatability with said category of skin coloration. A swatch pack of fabric samples according to claim 29, wherein the fabric colors include at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b less than 19, red with a Hunter b less than 9, brown with a Hunter chroma C H less than 5, pink with a Hunter b less than 15 and a Hunter saturation s H greater than 60, purple with a Hunter saturation s H less than 70 and a Hunter hue angle h H less than 320°, blue with a Hunter b less than -10 and a Hunter hue angle h H greater than 270°, green with a Hunter hue angle h H greater than 170°, white with a Hunter b less than 5, grey with a Hunter saturation s H less than 8, and black. A swatch pack of fabric samples according to claim 29, wherein the fabric colors include at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b between 19 and 25, red with a Hunter b between 9 and 15, beige with a Hunter saturation s H less than 25, brown with a Hunter chroma C H between 5 and 9.5, pink with a Hunter b less than 15 and a Hunter saturation s H less than 60, purple with a Hunter saturation s H between 50 and 70 and a Hunter hue angle h H less than 320°, blue with a Hunter b greater than -10 for a Hunter hue angle h H greater than 270° and less than -8.5 for a Hunter hue angle h H between 270° and 230°, green with a Hunter hue angle h H between 140° and 170° and Hunter saturation s H less than 70, white with a Hunter b between 5 and 10, grey with a Hunter saturation s H greater than 8. A swatch pack of fabric samples according to claim 29, wherein the fabric colors include at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b between 25 and 40, orange with a Hunter b less than 28, red with a Hunter b between 15 and 20, beige with a Hunter saturation s H between 25 and 28, brown with a Hunter chroma C H between 9.5 and 12, pink with a Hunter b greater than 15 and a Hunter L less than 60, purple with a Hunter saturation s H between 50 and 60 if Hunter hue angle s H is less than 320° and greater than 50 if Hunter hue angle h H is greater than 320°, blue with a Hunter b greater than -8 and a Hunter hue angle h H between 230° and 210°, green with a Hunter saturation s H greater than 70 for a Hunter hue angle h H greater than 140° and no restriction on Hunter saturation s H for Hunter hue angle h H less than 140°, white with a Hunter b greater than 10. A swatch pack of fabric samples according to claim 29, wherein the fabric colors include at least a plurality of the following colors: yellow with a Hunter b greater than 40, orange with a Hunter b greater than 28, red with a Hunter b greater than 20, beige with a Hunter saturation s H greater than 28, brown with a Hunter chroma C H , greater than 12, pink with a Hunter b greater than 15 and a Hunter L greater than 60, purple with a Hunter saturation s H less than 50 and no restriction on Hunter hue angle h H , blue with a Hunter b greater than -8 and a Hunter hue angle h H less than 210°, green with a Hunter b greater than 30, white with a Hunter b greater than 10.

Inventors: BILLMEYER FRED W JR, MACFARLANE DARBY SIMPSON, MACFARLANE DAVID KENNETH, BILLMEYER, FRED W., JR., MACFARLANE, DARBY SIMPSON, MACFARLANE, DAVID KENNETH
Applicants: CHROMATICS COLOR SCIENCES INT, CHROMATICS COLOR SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Application year: 1994
Main classification: G01J3
IPC codes: A61B5, A45D44, G01J3