MARKER GENE

Abstract: A method to select and identify transformed plant cells by expressing a chimeric gene encoding an aminoglycoside-6'-N-acetyltransferase in the plant cells in the presence of an aminoglycoside antibiotic.

Description: MARKER GENE This invention relates to a chimeric selectable marker gene comprising: a plant-expressible promoter, DNA encoding an aminoglycoside-6'-N-acetyltransferase (the "AAC(6')"), and a 3 1 end formation and polyadenylation region active in plant cells. This invention further relates to a process for selecting or identifying transformed plant cells by expressing the chimeric marker gene, encoding the AAC(6'), in the plant cells. The chimeric marker gene confers, on the plant cells, resistance to normally lethal or growth-suppressive concentrations of an antibiotic which is efficiently detoxified by the AAC(6') in the cells. This invention also relates to a plant cell, stably transformed with the chimeric marker gene, encoding the AAC(6'), and to a plant regenerated from this plant cell. Background of the invention Plant genetic engineering technology has made significant progress during the last decade. It has become possible to introduce stably foreign genes into plants. This has provided exciting opportunities for modern agriculture. The use of chimeric selectable marker genes in plant cell transformation has considerably simplified the selection of transformed plant cells. For example, by the expression of such a marker gene, transformed plant cells can be made resistant to antibiotics that are cytotoxic or growth-suppressing to non-transformed cells. A commonly used chimeric marker gene contains the neomycin phosphotransferase-II or nptll coding region (Bevan et al (1983) Nature 304, 184-187; Fraley et al (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 80, 4803-4807). The nptll gene confers resistance to kanamycin, neomycin and G-418 antibiotics on plant cells expressing the gene (Reynaerts et al (1987) Plant Mol. Biol. Manual, Gelvin, S.B. & Schilperoort, R.A. (eds) , Kluwer, Dordrecht, sect. A9, pp. 1-16) . Chimeric marker genes have typically contained: a plant-expressible promoter (with a 5' untranslated region) ; DNA (such as the npt II gene) encoding a selectable marker; and a 3 1 end formation and polyadenylation region active in plants. Although the versability of the nptll gene has been confirmed in chimeric marker genes in several plant systems over the years, there have been limitations on its use that have necessitated the development of alternative antibiotic-resistance genes for use in such chimeric selectable marker genes (Hayford et al (1988) Plant Physiol. 8^, 1216) . Furthermore, in many situations, a second complementary antibiotic-resistance gene has been needed for introduction into plants that have already been transformed with an antibiotic-resistance gene. Such alternative antibiotic-resistance genes already exist, but they often require the use of very toxic substrates and/or they do not allow efficient selection in all plant species. Certainly for species that are routinely vegetatively reproducible, like potato, antibiotic-resistance genes encoding different selectable markers, with different specific substrates, are required when different genes have to be engineered at different times into a plant. Among the known antibiotic-resistance genes are those encoding aminoglycoside antibiotic-acetylating (AAC) enzymes, four types of which have been characterized (based on the position of the modified amino group of the 2-deoxystreptamine-derived aminoglycosides) :AAC(1) , AAC(2') , AAC(3) and AAC(6') . See Shaw et al (1989) Anti icrob. Agents & Chemotherapy 33 , 2052-2062. High-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis has demonstrated the differences among the acetylated products of these four types of enzymes, and aminoglycoside-resistance profiles can be used to identify the presence of each of these types of enzymes in a host strain (Shaw et al (1989) supra) . European patent publication ("EP") 0 289 478 (Rogers et al (1988) , Hayford et al (1988) supra, and Carrer et al (1991) Plant Mol. biol. 0/7, 301-303 describe the selection on gentamycin of plants transformed with an aminoglycoside-3-N- acetyltransferase-encoding gene (the "aac(3) gene") . The aac(3) -IV gene was found to confer resistance to kanamycin (in Petunia) , but the level of resistance was, at most, only sufficient for marginal selection (Hayford et al (1988) supra) . These publications also describe supertransformation of tobacco, previously transformed with the nptll gene, with the aac(3) gene by selection on gentamycin-containing medium. EP 0 289 478 also describes the use of gentamycin as a substrate in the transformation of petunia, soybean, oilseed rape and alfalfa transformed with the aac(3) gene. Carrer et al (1991) supra also describes the transformation of tobacco plants with an aac(3) -I gene, only conferring resistance to gentamycin, whereby the gentamycin-resistant plants retain their sensitivity to kanamycin. According to Carrer et al (1991) supra, it may be more advantageous to use a selectable marker gene with a narrow substrate specificity in some cases. The AAC(6 ') -encoding genes (the "aac(6 ' ) genes") constitute a class of different but related genes acetylating the 5 ' amino group of several aminoglycoside antibiotics. Several bacterial aac(β') genes have been cloned and sequenced. According to Davis (1986) In Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine, pp. 474-489, (ed.) Lorian V., Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland and Phillips & Shannon (1984) British Med. Bull. 4J), 28-35, AAC(6') acetylateε tobramycin, kanamycin, amikacyn, neomycin, gentamycin C 1A and C 2 , sissomycin and netilmycin, although with varying efficiencies depending on the kind of AAC(6') . Two subtypes of aac(6 ' ) genes have been characterized by their aminoglycoside resistance profiles: aac(6 ' ) -I genes and aac-(6' ) -II genes; the former subclass comprises the aac(6 ' ) -IV and -4 genes, and the latter subclass comprises the aac(6 ' ) -III gene (Shaw et al (1989) supra) . However, other classifications of these genes have also been made. Another acetyltransferase, phosphinotricin acetyltransferase, has also been found to be capable of conferring a selectable phenotype (i.e., a herbicide resistance) to plant cells (De Block et al (1987) EMBO J. 6, 2513-2518) . EP 0 248 207 (Wohlleben et al, 1987) describes a gentamycin-resistance gene that is active in Streptomyces and is obtainable from a strain of S. qhanaensis by total digestion with Bglll. French patent publication 2 601 965 (Courvalin, 1988) describes a bifunctional gene encoding AAC(6') and APH(2* ') activities, the cloning and sequencing of this gene, and the use of parts of the gene as a DNA probe for detecting antibiotic-resistance developement in bacterial cultures. Summary of the invention In accordance with this invention is provided a chimeric selectable marker gene (the "chimeric aac(6 ' ) gene") , comprising the following operably linked elements in the same genetic locus: a plant-expressible promoter; a DNA sequence encoding an AAC(6') (the "aac(6') DNA") , particularly an aac(6' ) DNA with the sequence of SEQ ID No. 1, under the control of the promoter; and a 3' end formation and polyadenylation region active in plant cells. Also in accordance with this invention is provided a method for selecting or identifying transformed plant cells by: transforming the cells with the chimeric aac(6 ' ) gene; and then contacting the cells with concentrations of an aminoglycoside antibiotic that are lethal or growth-suppressive to non-transformed plant cells. Further in accordance with the invention is provided a plant cell, stably transformed with the chimeric aac(6 ' ) gene, a plant cell culture and plant regenerated from this plant cell, and a plant transformation vector, a plasmid and an Aqrobacterium strain containing the chimeric aac(6 ' ) gene. Detailed Description of the Invention The term "aac(6 ' ) DNA" as used herein means a DNA coding sequence encoding a protein (an ll AAC(6 1 )") which catalyses the acetylation of the 6 ' amino group of aminoglycoside antibiotics. This term includes a partly or fully synthetic DNA sequence, as well as a naturally occurring DNA sequence encoding an AAC(6'). Preferred aac(6 ' ) DNAs according to this invention include the DNA of SEQ ID No. 1 and substantially similar DNAs, such as the aac(6 ' ) DNAs described by Nobuta et al (1988) J. Bacteriol. 170, 3769) , Tolmaski (1990) Plasmid 2 _, 218-226 and Tran van Nhieu and Collatz (1987) J. Bacteriol. 169, 5708. Other aac (6 1 ) DNAs of this invention include those described by Davies and Smith (1978) Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 32, 469-518, Morohoshi et al (1984) J. Antibiotics 37, 1687-1691, Tenover et al. (date) J. Bacteriol. 170, 471, Ferretti et al (1986) J. Bacteriol. 167, 631, and Shaw et al (1989) Antimicrob. Agents and Chemotherapy 33, 2052. The term "chimeric aac(6 ' ) gene" as used herein means a chimeric selectable marker gene comprising the aac(6 ' ) DNA, operably linked to a plant-expressible promoter (including a 5' untranslated region) and a 3 1 end formation and polyadenylation region active in plants. The aac(6 ' ) DNA can also be expressed as a fusion protein in a chimeric gene fusion with another transforming DNA, so as to enhance selection for the desired genotype. The construction of this chimeric gene fusion can be carried out according to techniques derived from methods currently used for constructing chimeric genes comprising known markers. The term "selectable marker gene" as used herein means a DNA sequence, the expression of which in a plant cell confers a selectable phenotype (e.g., antibiotic resistance) to the plant cell. The term "translationally neutral modifications" as used herein means modifications of a gene or DNA sequence that do not affect the amino acid sequence encoded by the gene or DNA sequence. Preferred examples of such translationally neutral modifications are changes, by means of nucleotide substitutions, of codons into other codons encoding the same amino acids. The term "suitable substrate" or "suitable substrate antibiotic" as used herein is an aminoglycoside antibiotic (e.g., kanamycin) which is efficiently modified by AAC(6') so that expression of the aac(6 ' ) DNA in a plant cell confers resistance on the plant cell to the antibiotic. Hence, the term "substrate of an AAC(6')" as used herein means any aminoglycoside antibiotic which can be modified, i.e. acetylated, by the aac(6 ' ) gene product. An aac(6 ' ) DNA of this invention can easily be isolated from bacteria by routine procedures after cultivation on a suitable substrate containing normally inhibitory levels of an aminoglycoside antibiotic, such as kanamycin, for example as described by Nobuta et al (1988) J. Bacteriol. 170, 3769. AAC(6') activity can be assayed by conventional methods (Davieε (1986) supra; Shaw et al (1989) supra) . Preferably, an aac(6 ' ) DNA of this invention is inserted in a plant genome downstream (i.e., 3') of, and under the control of, a promoter which can direct the expression of the gene in plant cells. Preferred promoters include, but are not limited to, the strong constitutive 35S promoter (Odell et al (1985) Nature 313 , 810) or duplicated 35S promoter (Kay et al (1987) Science 236, 1299) of cauliflower mosaic virus; 35S promoters have been obtained from different isolates (Hull & Howell (1987) Virology iB6, 482-493) . Other preferred promoters include the TR1 ' promoter and the TR2 ' promoter (Velten et al (1984) EMBO J. _3 / 2723) . Also preferred are monocot promoters such as the promoters described in EPO 0 342 926 or EP 0 459 643. Alternatively, a promoter can be utilized which is not constitutive but rather is specific for one or more plant tissues or organs. For example, the aac(6' ) DNA can be selectively expressed in the green tissues of a plant by placing the DNA under the control of a light- inducible promoter such as the promoter of the ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate-carboxylase small subunit gene as described in EP 0 193 259. Another alternative is to use a promoter whose expression is inducible by temperature or chemical factors or a promoter that is expressed preferentially or selectively in the time period or the developmental stage at which cells are selected, such as a callus-specific promoter, which have been used previously with other markers. In any event, it is evident that a promoter for use in this invention must at least allow sufficient expression of the aac(6 ' ) DNA in plant cells to confer antibiotic- resistance to the plant cells. It is preferred that the aac(6' ) DNA be inserted upstream (i.e., 5') of suitable 3 1 transcription regulation signals (i.e., transcript 3' end formation and polyadenylation signals) . Preferred 3 ' transcription regulation signals include those of the chalcone synthase gene (Sommer & Saedler (1986) Mol. Gen. Genet. 202, 429), the cauliflower mosaic virus (Mogen et al (1990) The Plant Cell 2 , 1261) , the octopine synthase gene (Gielen et al (1984) EMBO J. 3_, 835) or the T-DNA gene 7 (Velten & Schell (1985) Nucl. Acids Res. 33, 6981) . In accordance with this invention, all or part of an aac(6' ) DNA of this invention can be stably inserted in a conventional manner into the nuclear genome of a plant cell, and the so-transformed plant cell can be used to produce a transgenic plant showing resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics. In this regard, a disarmed Ti-plasmid containing the chimeric aac(6' ) gene in Agrobacterium (e.g., A_;_ tumefaciens) can be used to transform a plant cell using the procedures described, for example, in EP 0 116 718 and EP 0 270 822, PCT publication WO 84/02913, EP 0 242 246, De Block (1988) Theor. Appl. Genet. 7_6 767-774, and Gould et al (1991) Plant Physiol. 9j5, 426 (which are incorporated herein by reference) . Preferred Ti-plasmid vectors contain the chimeric aac(6' ) gene between the border sequences, or at least located to the left of the right border sequence, of the T-DNA of the Ti-plasmid. Of course, other types of vectors can be used to transform the plant cell, using procedures such as direct gene transfer (as described, for example, in EP 0 233 247) , pollen mediated transformation (as described, for example, in EP 0 270 356, PCT publication WO 85/01856, and US patent 4,684,611, plant RNA virus-mediated transformation (as described, for example, in EP 0 067 553 and US patent 4,407,956) , liposome- mediated transformation (as described, for example, in US patent 4,536,475) and other methods such as the methods for transforming monocotε (e.g., the major cereals including corn, rice, wheat, barley and rye) as described in PCT publication WO 92/09696. In case the plant to be transformed is corn, other recently developed methods can also be used such as, for example, the method described for certain lines of corn by From et al (1990) Bio/Tech. j$, 833, Gordon-Kamm et al (1990) The Plant Cell 2 , 603, and Gould et al (1991) supra. In case the plant to be transformed is rice, other recently developed methods can also be used such as, for example, the methods described by Shimamoto et al (1989) Nature 338, 274) , Datta et al (1990) Bio/tech. J3, 736 and Hayashimoto et al (1990) Plant Physiol. 9_3, 857. In order to improve the expression of the chimeric aac(6 ' ) gene of this invention in a plant, the aac(6 ' ) DNA can be modified, for example by changing its natural codon usage to form an equivalent artificial aac(6 ' ) DNA. Such modifications can include introducing functional introns and/or translationally neutral modifications into the aac(6 ' ) DNA sequence in order to eliminate deleterious DNA sequences present in this bacterial DNA, such as are described in PCT patent application PCT/EP92/02547. This can be done directly by modifying (in a translationally neutral manner) such deleterious DNA sequences, inhibiting expression in the plant cells, or indirectly by adapting the codon usage of the aac(6' ) DNA to that preferred by the plant, for example as described by Murray et al (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 1/7, 477. Additionally for achieving sufficient expression in monocot plants such as corn, an efficiently spliced monocot intron, e.g. intron 1 from the corn adh gene, can be added to the chimeric aac(6' ) gene (Koziel et al (1993) Bio/Tech. 3., 194-200) . A transformed plant of this invention, regenerated from a plant cell transformed with the chimeric aac(6' ) gene, shows resistance against suitable substrate antibiotics by virtue of the production of AAC(6') activity in its plant cells. Such a plant can be used in a conventional breeding scheme to produce more transformed plants with the same aminoglycoside antibiotic-resistance characteristics or to introduce the chimeric aac(6' ) gene into other varieties of the same or related plant species by standard breeding techniques. Seeds, which are obtained from the transformed plants, contain the chimeric aac(6' ) gene as a stable genomic insert. Since the spectrum of antibiotics which can be chemically modified by expression of an aac(6' ) DNA of this invention is different from that of the nptll coding region, the aac(6' ) DNA can be used with the nptll coding region in different chimeric selectable marker genes where two different foreign genes are to be introduced into a plant, with each foreign gene being associated with its own chimeric marker gene. When engineering multiple chimeric marker genes in a plant, it may be advantageous to use a chimeric aac(6' ) gene only conferring resistance to a limited group of aminoglycoside antibiotics (Carrer et al (1991) supra) . However, if only one chimeric marker gene is to be used, it is preferred to use a chimeric aac(6' ) gene with kanamycin as the suitable substrate for plant cells. In this regard, the enzymatic assay for detecting acetyltransferase activity is often quicker and more convenient to use than the phosphotransferase assay used to detect np_tlI-activity. To test for the successful transformation of plants with an aac(6' ) DNA, different methods are available. For example, antibiotic-resistance can be checked in a callus induction test or a dot application assay; the presence and the activity of AAC (6 1 ) can also be analyzed by an enzymatic assay; Western blotting can provide an easy immunological test but is less sensitive; and kanamycin resistance can be followed in the progeny of transgenic plants by the sowing of seeds on kanamycin-containing media. The following Examples illustrate the invention. Unless otherwise stated in the Examples, all procedures for making and manipulating recombinant DNA are carried out by the standardized procedures described in Sambrook et al, Molecular Cloning - A laboratory Manual, Second Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY (1989) or in Ausubel et al. , Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, vols. 1 and 2, Current Protocols, USA (1994) . Sequence Listing SEQ ID No. 1 shows i) the DNA sequence of an aac(6' ) DNA which comes from a Shiqella plasmid, and ii) the corresponding amino acid sequence encoded by the aac(6 ■ ) DNA. SEQ ID No. 2 shows: the amino acid sequence of the AAC(6' ) protein. SEQ ID No. 3 shows: the nucleotide sequence of PCR primer "RVA61". SEQ ID No. 4 shows: the nucleotide sequence of PCR primer "0FD15". SEQ ID No. 5 shows: the plasmid "pTRVA3" containing a chimeric aac(6' ) gene with a 35S-2 promoter, the aac(6' ) DNA of SEQ ID No. 1, and the 3 1 end formation and polyadenylation region from T-DNA gene 7. SEG ID No. 6 shows: the amino acid sequence of the AAC(6') protein. Examples Example 1. Cloning of an aac(6' ) DNΑ and construction of a chimeric aac(6' ) gene The aac(6' ) DNA was obtained from the mini-Sa plasmid, pGV1106 (Leemans et al (1982) Gene 19_ , 361-364) . The 1.5 Kb PvuII/Hindlll fragment of pGV1106, containing the aac(6 ' ) DNA, was ligated to the Scal- linearized plasmid pGSC1600 (Cornelissen & Vandewiele (1989) Nucl. Acids Res. JL7, 19-29) after Klenow treatment. The resultant plasmid, pFD1002A, was used as a template for PCR, using the primers RVA61 and 0FD15, of SEQ ID Noε. 3 and 4, respectively. RVA61 iε complementary to the non-coding εtrand of the aac(6 ' ) DNA and itε untranεlated sequences in pFD1002A. The Sall/Ba HI aac(6' ) PCR fragment of pFGD1002A was ligated to the 7.2 Kb Sall/BamHI fragment of the plaεmid pGSJ290, containing the chimeric gene, P35S-nptII-3 'g7, to yield the plaεmid, PTRVA3 , of SEQ ID No. 5. pGSJ290 was derived from pGV825 (Deblaere et al (1985) Nucl. Acids Res. _13_, 4777-4787), in which a chimeric P35S-nptII-3 'g7 gene construct was cloned between T-DNA border repeats. The 3 1 untranslated end of the T-DNA gene 7 (i.e., 3'g7) was aε deεcribed by Velten & Schell (1985) aac(6' )εupra, the nptll gene was from pKM109/90 (Reiεε et al (1984) EMBO J. 3 , 3317-3322), and the CaMV 35S promoter (i.e., P35S) waε a cauliflower mosaic virus 35S-2 promoter as described in EP 0 193 259 and in Gardner et al (1981) Nucl. Acidε Res. 9_, 2871-2888. The chimeric p35S-nptII-3 'q7 gene construct was cloned between the Hpal and Bglll siteε of the T-DNA between the right and left border repeatε of pGV825. Due to the introduction of a Ba HI restriction site downstream of its translation initiation site, the aac(6 ' ) DNA sequence in pTRVA3 , aε shown in SEQ ID No. 5, contained the amino acids Asp and Pro at amino acid positions 2 and 3, respectively, and contained the chimeric aac(6' ) gene, P35S-aac(6' ) -3'g7, including the aac(6') DNA with the sequence of SEQ ID No. 1. Example 2. selection of aac(6' )-transformed tobacco cells on kanamycin. Plaεmidε pTRVA3 and pGSJ290 were mobilized from E. coli into A_ ; _ tumefaciens strain C58Cl-Rif R (pGV2260; Deblaere et al (1985) supra) by means of a triparental cross as described by Deblaere et al (1985) supra and EP 0 193 259. The resultant Agrobacteria were selected on minimal A medium (Miller (1972) Experimentε in Molecular Geneticε, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preεε, Cold Spring Harbor, NY) . Tobacco cv Petit Havana SRI cellε were cocultivated with theεe Agrobacteria, and tranεformed tobacco cellε were εelected uεing antibiotic reεiεtance according to De Block et al (1984) EMBO J. 3_, 1681-1689. Agrobacterium εtrainε used for infection of tobacco protoplasts were: C58Cl-Rif R (pGV2260) as a negative control, C58Cl-Rif R (pGV2260: :pTRVA3) which contains the aac(6' ) DNA, and C58Cl-Rif R (pGV2260: :pGSJ290) which contains the nptll gene. One week after infection, the protoplastε were transferred to selective media containing one of the following different concentrations of kanamycin sulphate (Km) :0-25-50-100, 6200 μg/ l. Seven weeks after infection, calli started growing from cells cocultivated with C58Cl-Rif R (pGV2260: :pTRVA3) and C58Cl-Rif R (pGV2260: :pGSJ290) at all Km concentrations. Protoplasts infected with pGV2260 (negative control) only formed calli on medium without Km. After transfer of the calli to εhoot- inducing medium containing 200 μg/ml Km, shootε were readily formed. Southern analysis of DNA extracted from kanamycin-resistant regenerated tobacco plants confirmed the stable integration of the aac(6' ) DNA. Example 3. Selection of aac(6' )-transformed potato cells on kanamycin. Leaf discs of potato variety Yesmina were cocultivated with Aqrobacterium tumefaciens strains C58Cl-Rif R (pGV2260: :pTRVA3) and C58Cl-Rif R (pGV2260: :pGSJ290) , carrying the chimeric genes of Example 2 containing either the aac(6 ' ) DNA or nptll gene as described by De Block (1988) supra. The leaf discs were transferred to calluε induction medium containing 50 μg/ml kanamycin εulphate. About 30% of the leaf diεcε that were cocultivated with Aqrobacterium C58Cl-Rif R (pGV2260: :pGSJ290) produced growing calli in the presence of kanamycin, while about 70% of the leaf discs that were cocultivated with Aqrobacterium C58Cl-Rif R (pGV2260: :pTRVA3) produced growing calli after culturing for 6 weeks on kanamycin medium. After tranεfer of the aac(6' ) -tranεformed calli to εhoot-regenerating medium, shoots readily formed. The regenerated potato plants are found to retain the kanamycin-resistant phenotype. Southern analysis of DNA extracted from the kanamycin-resiεtant potato plants and their progeny confirms the integration of the aac(6 ' ) DNA. Example 4. Assay for enzymatic activity in aac(6' )- transformed plants. The tobacco callus and leaf tisεue of Example 2 containing the chimeric aac(6' ) gene, showed AAC(6') activity when tested in a Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)-acetyltransferase assay for kanamycin. The acetyltransferase asεay for determining phosphinotricin-acetyltransferase activity according to De Block et al (1987) EMBO J. 6, 2513-2518 waε used, with the exception that kanamycin sulphate was uεed as a substrate instead of phosphinotricin in a concentration which was twice the concentration of phosphinotricin used by De Block et al (cf. supra) , and 2 μl of u C-acetylcoenzyme A were added instead of a mixture containing both the radioactive and the non- radioactive form of the enzyme. Upon incubation for 30 minutes at 37°C, the reaction mixture waε spotted onto TLC plates, and the reaction products were εeparated by chromatography in l-propanol/NH 4 OH (3/2) . Extractε of the calli containing the chimeric aac(6' ) gene catalyzed the acetylation of kanamycin, while no reaction waε obεerved with extractε of calli from non- transformed SRI plants and from nptll-expresεing calli. Alεo extractε from leaf tiεεue of regenerated aac(6' ) -tranεformed tobacco plants were found to efficiently acetylate kanamycin. Needless to say, this invention iε not limited to tobacco or potato plants transformed with the aac(6' ) DNA. It includeε any plant, such as tomato, cotton, rapeεeed, alfalfa, εunflower, corn, rice, soybean, brasεica, sugar beet and other vegetables, tranεformed with an aac(6' ) DNA. Nor iε this invention limited to the use of the chimeric aac(6' ) gene of SEQ ID No. 5 or the aac(6' ) DNA of SEQ ID No. 1 for transforming plant cells so that they express an AAC(6'). Other natural and artificial chimeric genes and DNA can be used. In this regard, the aac(6' ) DNA sequences of SEQ ID Nos. 1 and 5 can be modified by: 1) replacing some codons with others that code either for the same or different, preferably the same, amino acidε; and/or 2) deleting or adding some codons; provided that εuch odificationε do not εubstantially alter the properties, especially the capacity to detoxifly aminoglycoside antibiotics, of the encoded AAC(6' ) . All publicationε referred to in this application are hereby incorporated by reference.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A chimeric selectable marker gene for transforming a plant to render it resiεtant to an a inoglycoεide antibiotic (e.g., kanamycin) ; said marker gene comprising in sequence: a) a plant-expreεεible promoter; b) an aac(6 ' ) DNA; and c) a 3 ' end formation and polyadenylation region active in plant cellε. 2. The marker gene of claim 1, wherein the aac(6') DNA: a) encodes the AAC(6') of SEQ ID No. 1 or b) has either i) the DNA sequence of SEQ ID No. 1 or ii) a variant thereof encoding an AAC(6') with subεtantially the εame antibiotic-detoxifying propertieε aε the AAC(6') of SEQ ID No. 1. 3. A method for εelecting or identifying tranεformed plant cells, comprising the steps of: transforming plant cells with a foreign DNA comprising the marker gene of claim 1 or 2 ; and then growing said transformed cells in concentrations of an aminoglycoside antibiotic, such as kanamycin, that are lethal or growth-suppreεεive to non-tranεformed plant cells. 4. A plant cell, the nuclear genome of which contains the marker gene of claim 1 or 2. 5. A plant, seed or plant cell culture comprising a plurality of the plant cellε of claim 4. 6. A plant genome containing the marker gene of claim 1 or 2. 7. A plant tranεfor ation vector, particularly a Ti plaεmid, containing the marker gene of claim 1 or 2. 8. Aqrobacterium tumefacienε containing the vector of claim 7. 9. A method for rendering a plant cell reεiεtant to an aminoglycoεide antibiotic (e.g., kanamycin) ; the method comprising the step of: transforming the nuclear genome of the cell with the marker gene of claim 1 or 2. 10. A method for detoxifying an aminoglycoεide antibiotic in a plant cell; the method compriεing the εtep of: providing the marker gene of claim 1 or 2 in the nuclear genome of the cell.

Inventors: AARSSEN ROEL VAN, CORNELISSEN MARCUS, GOSSELE VERONIQUE, REYNAERTS ARLETTE, CORNELISSEN, MARCUS, GOSSELE, VERONIQUE, REYNAERTS, ARLETTE, VAN AARSSEN, ROEL
Applicants: AARSSEN ROEL VAN, CORNELISSEN MARCUS, GOSSELE VERONIQUE, PLANT GENETIC SYSTEMS NV, REYNAERTS ARLETTE, CORNELISSEN, MARCUS, GOSSELE, VERONIQUE, PLANT GENETIC SYSTEMS, N.V., REYNAERTS, ARLETTE, VAN AARSSEN, ROEL
Application year: 1994
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: A01H5, C12N1, C12N5, C12N9, C12N15, C12R1