METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DETECTION OF SALMONELLA

Abstract: Isolated nucleic acid molecules comprising one or more of the sefU?1?, sefU?2?, sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, agfA, tctA, tctB, or tctC genes of Salmonella and a gene cluster that contains one or more of such genes, such as the sefU?2?U?1? gene cluster, the sefBCD gene cluster, and the tctI, tctII or tctIII gene clusters. Probes and primers complementary to or derived from said genes. Isolated proteins encoded by said genes. Methods and composition suitable for diagnostic tests utilizing the isolated genes and proteins to give highly specific diagnostic assays to Salmonella, S. enteritidis, S. dublin, S. gallinarum, and/or enteropathogenic bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Description: Description METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DETECTION OF SALMONELLA Cross-Reference To Related Applications This application is a continuation-in-part of United States patent application Serial No. 08/054,452, filed April 26, 1993 and presently pending. Technical Field The present invention relates generally to diagnostic tests and, more particularly, to nucleic acid based diagnostic tests, and antibody-based diagnostic tests directed to Salmonella. Background of the Invention In 1980, the World Health Organization estimated that in developing countries food poisoning from infection with Salmonella bacteria (salmonellosis) contributed to more than 1 billion cases of acute diarrhea in children under the age of five years (Kvenberg and Archer, Food Technol. 40:77-9%, 1987), and at least 5 million deaths (this reference, and all other references cited herein, is hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). Since the mid-1980s, the worldwide incidence of salmonellosis has increased steadily. S. enteritidis, in particular, has been implicated in the sharp increase in food borne infection since 1983. Indeed, the current frequency of S. enteritidis infections constitute a worldwide pandemic (Rodrique et al., Epidemiol. Infect. 105:21-27, 1990). The severity of the disease is greatest in infants, the elderly, the infirm and in other persons with inadequate or impaired immune systems, including the malnourished. In third world countries where malnutrition is more commonly a complicating factor, mortality rates due to S. enteritidis infection as high as 28% have been reported. In both the clinical and industrial settings, the situation is also complicated by the faα that many people are asymptomatic carriers. Salmonella spp., including S. enteritidis, often possess several plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance genes that complicate the treatment of human infections. In the industrialized world, it is the contamination of food products by Salmonella bacteria that is most directly threatening to human health. Hence, it is not surprising that the increase in salmonellosis in first world countries parallels the centralization of food production and processing despite continued improvements in epidemiological and microbiological methods. The significance of the problem is reflected in one aspect in the poultry- related industries. For example, in the U.S. alone hatcheries produce approximately 100 million broiler chicks per week and chicken egg production in the U.S. has reached 5 billion annually. A large proportion of S. enteritidis infections have been associated with the contamination of the contents of whole shell eggs resulting from vertical transmission of this pathogen from breeder stocks due to transovarian infection. This is significant since common procedures designed to decontaminate the external shell surface are not effective. The problem presented by S. enteritidis is exacerbated by the fact that infection in the adult laying hens may be asymptomatic. Typically, S. enteritidis infection of laying birds does not have a significant adverse effect on fertility, hatchability or egg production. Similarly, broiler chickens may be asymptomatic throughout their lifetime, although losses of about 20% do occur in infected flocks due to death in chicks, retardation of growth and rejection of contaminated birds at slaughtering. Contaminated poultry feed may be a major source of infection, but stress to poultry due to handling, transportation and overcrowding add to the problem by increasing the shedding of Salmonella from infected chickens. The end result is that the majority of modern processing plants, which process about 10,000 birds per hour, are contaminated and Salmonella are typically isolated from 40% to 70% of turkey or chicken carcasses sampled in the U.S. and Canada. The overall economic costs of the rising incidence of food borne infections have been significant. The U.S. General Accounting Office has recently estimated the cost of S. enteritidis food poisoning in the U.S. between 1985 to 1990 at $118 million in lost productivity, medical and hospital costs resulting from about 9,500 illnesses. The U.S. Center for Disease Control receives more than 40,000 case reports annually but attributes greater than 2 million cases and roughly 2,000 deaths per year in the United States to salmonellosis (Cohen and Tauxe, Science 234:964-969, 1986). The economic cost related to treatment of salmonellosis in the U.S. was estimated to be $50 million in 1986. About 8 million cases involve physician consultation and an estimated 250,000 cases require hospitalization. Non-hospitalized cases are thought to have accounted for about $680 million in medical costs and minimally $2 billion in lost productivity. Others estimate the total costs of salmonellosis in the U.S. arising from medical treatment and lost productivity to be as high as $23 billion per year (Kvenberg and Archer, supra). The losses absorbed by the food industry from liability and product loss are undoubtedly passed on to the consumer. Thus, there is a need for an effective risk- management program to monitor the different phases of poultry production including breeding, raising, slaughtering, packing and further processing, distribution and preparation, and consumption. The development of strategies for creating Salmonella- free feed, the control of Salmonella in breeder flocks, hatcheries, and product operations will include development of more effective diagnostics. Accordingly, there is a general need for a technology which could be applied to the inexpensive, rapid detection of all Salmonella food borne pathogens. One type of assay for Salmonella comprises the standardized culture tests for Salmonella in the food industry. These culture assays are recognized by different names in different countries but they share the same basic approach. In the United States, the procedures are known as the "Bacteriological Analytical Manual" (BAM), published in 1984 by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, Arlington, Va.). In Canada, the procedures are known as the "Official Canadian Wet Culture Method" (WCM); the protocol most often used to test food samples is MFD- 20. Within the standardized tests, Samples are incubated at 30°C to 37°C for 18 to 24 hours in a rich, non-selective medium to promote recovery of the cells and allow them to begin to replicate to the levels detectable by current technologies. There will likely be an excess of other microorganisms in the sample, some of which may be from the closely related family Enterohacteriaceae. Therefore, a selective growth step is conducted to enrich for Salmonella bacteria, for example, by inoculating a small sample of the pre-enrichment culture into a selenite-cysteine broth, tetrathionite broth, or Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth for 18 to 24 hours, typically at an elevated temperature such as 43 °C. The cells are then plated on a selective medium, such as brilliant green agar or xylose-lysine-deoxycholate agar, and incubated overnight. Presumptive colonies are then transferred to various biochemical or metabolic test media for confirmation. Pure cultures of Salmonella are then grown overnight on agar slopes for serotyping. In total, three to four days are required to obtain presumptive positive results, and a five to seven day wait can be necessary before final confirmation and identification of the Salmonella. An alternative test to assay for the presence of Salmonella is based on nucleic acid probes. One such test uses probes constructed from a part of t eβmA gene of Salmonella typhimurium, and is preferentially based on two particular sequences (Madonna and Woods, EP Publication No. 383,509, Orthodiagnostic Systems, Raritan, N.J.). Briefly, a nucleic acid molecule of a known sequence is introduced to a sample under conditions suitable for hybridization of the nucleic acid molecule to its target nucleic acid sequence in the DNA or RNA of Salmonella. Alternative hybridization- based assays include the colorimetric Gene-Trak® Salmonella Assay (Gene-Trak Systems, Framingham, MA), Fitts et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46: 1146-1151, 1983. Another alternative test is a fluorescent antibody assay (FA test Thomason, J. Food Protection 44:381-384, 1981), which includes the Salmonella Flouro-Kit (Incstar, Stillwater, Minn.). Such a test uses polyvalent antisera prepared against Salmonella flagella (anti-H) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) O-chain (anti-O). The assay can also use purified polyclonal IgG antibodies. However, an FA test is laborious, has a high level of false-positive results, yields only presumptive positive samples, and requires visual determinations to be made by highly skilled personnel using expensive equipment. Another test is an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). In general, as with the FA test described above, antibodies to flagella or lipopolysaccharide form the basis of most EIAs. EIAs can use either polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies. However, as with the FA test, false-positive results are a significant problem. Further, these assays can take an extensive testing period, and some diagnostic tests using monoclonal antibodies to Salmonella flagellin have reported significant problems with false-negative results. Examples of such EIAs include the TECRA Salmonella immunocapture ELISA manufactured by Bioenterprises Pty. Ltd., Roseville, NSW, Australia, and the Dynatech Laboratories, Inc. (Chantilly, Virginia) Salmonella MICROELISA®-92 and MICROELISA®-32 Detection kit. Still another type of test is an agglutination assay (Benge, Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20 5:294-298, 1989), such as the Wellcollex-Colour Salmonella assay (Wellcome; Bouret and Jeanjean, J. Clinical Microbiology 30:2180-2186, 1992), which is based on anti-Salmonella antibodies conjugated to latex beads. This form of test is relatively simple, but requires at least two to three days to provide results from food or environmental samples, and has a relatively low level of sensitivity. A further type of test is the selective motility assay, in which a sample potentially containing Salmonella is introduced into a pre-enrichment or selective growth medium in the first chamber of a double-chambered device. (Humbert et al., Letters in Applied Microbiology 70:245-249, 1990) The motile Salmonella then favorably grow and move across the pre-enrichment growth medium, entering the second chamber, which contains a semi-solid medium having a sample of antisera at the far end. As the motile Salmonella replicate and migrate into and across the second chamber, the antisera diffuses toward the oncoming bacteria, forming an immunoprecipitate line at the point where the bacteria contact the antisera. Yet another test is a bacteriophage assay, such as the Vitek System's Salmonella test (McDonnell-Douglas Health Systems Co.). This assay uses bacteriophage that specifically recognize receptors on Salmonella. An enzyme is conjugated to the bacteriophage and is used for detection purposes. This test requires a minimum of 48 hours and is subject to false positive and false negative results. Yet another test is an enzyme-linked amperometric immunosensor, a type of biosensor format (Brooks et al., Journal of Applied Bacteriology 73: 189-196, 1992). Accordingly, the present invention discloses compositions and methods suitable for the diagnosis of Salmonella in a sample, including isolated nucleic acid molecules, isolated proteins, probes and primers. Summary of the Invention In one aspect, the present invention provides an isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a sefU2UjBCD gene cluster, which is included in the sefU2U j ABCD gene cluster. In an alternative embodiment, the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises a sefABCD gene cluster or a se U^t// gene cluster. In further alternative embodiments, the present invention provides isolated nucleic acid molecules comprising a sefA gene, a sefB gene, a sefC gene, a sefD gene, a sefUj gene, or a efU2 gene. The present invention also provides an isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising an agfA gene. Still further, the present invention provides an isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a tctCBA gene cluster. In alternative embodiments, the present invention provides isolated nucleic acid molecules comprising a tctA gene, tctB gene or tctC gene. Preferably, the isolated nucleic acid molecules are recombinant, which means that the molecule has been constructed using recombinant nucleic acid techniques and includes nucleic acid sequences attached to the gene that are not naturally attached to, or in some cases proximate to, the gene. In another aspect, the present invention provides probes based on one or more of the sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, sefUj, efU2, agfA, tctA, tctB, or tctC genes. In particular, these probes comprise at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence depicted in Figures 2A-2D from nucleotide No. 136 to nucleotide No. 633 (SEQ ID No. ); Figures 2A-2D from nucleic acid No. 755, to nucleic acid No. 1495 (SEQ ID No. ); Figures 2A-2D from nucleic acid No. 1512 to nucleic acid No. 3956 (SEQ ID No. ); Figures 2A-2D from nucleic acid No. 3953, to nucleic acid No. 4402 (SEQ ID No. ); Figures 3A-3B from nucleic acid No. 2 to nucleic acid No. 1108; Figures 4A-4B from nucleic acid No. 3323 to nucleic acid No. 4420 (SEQ ID No. ); Figure 5 from nucleic acid No. 2727, to nucleic acid No. 3236 (SEQ ID No. ); Figures 6A-6B from nucleic acid No. 1293 to nucleic acid No. 2270 (SEQ ID No. ); or, Figure 7 A from nucleic acid No. 1, to nucleic acid No. 361 (SEQ ID No. ); Figure 7B from nucleic acid No. 1 to nucleic acid No. 451. In one embodiment, the probes comprise one or more of the sefA gene, the sefB gene, the sefC gene, the sefUj gene and the sefU2 gene, and the probes are capable of specifically hybridizing to S. enteritidis, S. berta, S. pullorum, S. dublin and S. gallinarum under conditions of high stringency. In another aspect, the present invention provides vector constructs comprising a sefϋ^U CD gene cluster. In an alternative embodiment, the vector construct comprises a sefABCD gene cluster. In still further alternative embodiments, the vector construct comprises a sefA gene, a sefB gene, a sefC gene, a sefD gene, a sefUj gene or a sefU2 8 ene - The present invention also provides a vector construct comprising an agfA gene. The present invention further provides a vector construct comprising the tctCBA gene cluster. In alternative embodiments, the vector construct comprises a tctA gene, a tctB gene or a tctC gene. In preferred embodiments, the vector construct of the invention comprises an expression vector. Even further preferably, the expression vector is able to express the gene or gene cluster upon introduction of the expression vector into a cell of a living organism, further preferably a plant or on which in some embodiments is animal. The host cell for the expression vector construct is preferably E. coli, a Salmonella, a Shigella spp., Citrobacter, Enterobacteria, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces, Bacillus, Staphylococcus aureus, further preferably an E. coli or a Salmonella. In a further aspect, present invention provides a probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figure 7 A, from nucleic acid No. 1 to nucleic acid No. 361, or Figure 7B from nucleic acid No. 1 to nucleic acid No. 451, the probe capable of specifically hybridizing to the DNA of GWPQ-fimbriae (SEQ ID No. ) encoding enteropathogenic bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae under conditions of moderate stringency. Conditions of moderate stringency are such that a mismatch of a single base pair or similar small number of base pairs does not prevent hybridization, yet only nucleic acids encoding a GWPQ-type fimbrin amino acid sequence are able to hybridize to the probe. In still a further aspect, the present invention provides probes capable of specifically hybridizing to a nucleic acid molecule from greater than 99% of Salmonella strains that are pathogenic to warm-blooded animals relative to nucleic acid molecules from other, preferably virtually all, microorganisms. It is particularly preferred that the probes be able to distinguish such strains from all other microorganisms. In a preferred embodiment, the probes are able to specifically hybridize to greater than 99.5% of such Salmonella strains. In yet a further aspect, the present invention provides a primer suitable for a nucleic acid amplification procedure wherein the primer is able to specifically hybridize to a nucleic acid molecule from greater than 99% of Salmonella strains that are pathogenic to warm-blooded animals relative to nucleic acid molecules from virtually all other microbial organisms. In a preferred embodiment, the primer is able to specifically hybridize to greater than 99.5% of such Salmonella strains. In a preferred embodiment, the primer is one of a set of two primers that are able to hybridize to opposing strands of a target sequence, such that the set is suitable for use in the PCR reaction. In yet a further aspect, the present invention provides a method for detecting the presence of Salmonella in a sample comprising treating cells contained within the sample to expose the cellular nucleic acids, then incubating the cellular nucleic acids with one or more of the probes, preferably labeled, described above under conditions suitable for desired hybridization, and then detecting the presence of the hybridized labeled probe. In a preferred embodiment, the exposed cellular nucleic acid is subjected to an amplification procedure, such as PCR or LCR, prior to incubation with the labeled probe to give a hybridized labeled probe or a product build up that is detected spectrophotometrically. In a further aspect, the present invention provides a method for detecting the presence of antibodies to Salmonella that are in a sample. The sample is contacted with TctC protein that is bound to a solid phase, preferably composed of styrene, under conditions suitable for the antibodies in the sample to bind to the protein and then the antibodies are detected. In alternative embodiments, the protein is a SefA protein, a SefC protein, or an AgfA protein, a FimA protein or a SefD protein, or a fimbrial or aggregative structure incorporating such proteins, such as SEF14 (for SefA), SEF21 (for FimA), SEF17 (for AgfA) or SEF18 (for SefD). In a further alternative embodiment, the method is for detecting the presence of Salmonella in a sample, and comprises contacting the sample with a labeled antibody to SefD protein under conditions suitable for the antibody to bind to the SefD protein, and then detecting the presence of the bound labeled antibody. In another alternative embodiment, the antibodies are to a SefA protein, a SefC protein, an AgfA protein, a FimA protein, or a TctC protein. In still another aspect, the present invention provides methods able to distinguish greater than 99% of the strains of Salmonella that are pathogenic to warm¬ blooded animals from virtually all other microbes in less than 24 hours. In these methods, cells from a sample are treated to expose cellular nucleic acids, then the cellular nucleic acids are incubated with one or more of the probes, preferably labeled, described above under conditions suitable for desired hybridization, and then the hybridized labeled probe is detected. In a preferred embodiment, the exposed cellular nucleic acids are amplified prior to the incubation with the labeled probe. In a further preferred embodiment, these methods are able to distinguish greater than 99.5% of the strains of Salmonella. In an alternative embodiment, the methods of the present invention provide for detecting the presence of GWPQ (SEQ. ID No. ) fimbria- encoding, or SefA-type, SefD-type or FimA-type fimbriae encoding, enteropathogenic bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae in a sample. In this method, cells within the sample are treated to expose cellular nucleic acids, the cellular nucleic acids are incubated with the labeled probe (as described above) under conditions suitable for hybridization, and then the hybridized labeled probe is detected. In a preferred embodiment, the exposed cellular nucleic acids are amplified prior to the incubation step. In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of detecting greater than 99.5% of Salmonella in a sample, preferably greater than 99.9% of Salmonella in a sample, and further preferably all of such Salmonella. The method comprises a nucleic acid probe assay, an antibody assay and/or a protein assay, as described above and set forth more fully below, wherein the method targets a group of the above genes, and/or utilizes a cocktail of the respective gene products, comprising the agfA gene, the fimA gene, and the tctC gene. Further, the group and/or cocktail may comprise a sefA gene. These and other aspects of the present invention will become evident upon reference to the following detailed description and attached drawings. In addition, various references are set forth below which describe in more detail certain procedures or compositions (e.g., plasmids, etc.); such references are incorporated by reference in their entirety. Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 is a schematic illustration and open reading frame analysis of the sefU2UjABCD gene cluster. Figures 2A-2D depicts the nucleotide sequences of sefA, sefB, sefC and sefD, and the corresponding predicted amino acid sequences. Figures 3A-3B depicts the nucleotide sequences of sefUj and sefU2 and the corresponding predicted amino acid sequences. Figures 4A-4B depicts the nucleotide sequence of tctA and the corresponding predicted amino acid sequence. Figure 5 depicts the nucleotide sequence of tctB and the corresponding predicted amino acid sequence. Figures 6A-6B depicts the nucleotide sequence of tctC and the corresponding predicted amino acid sequence. Figure 7A depicts the nucleotide sequence of an agfA gene fragment amplified from S. enteritidis 27655-3 b TxφhoA mutant strain and cloned into pUC19, and the corresponding predicted amino acid sequence. The solid arrows indicate PCR primer pairs TAF3 and TAF4; the dashed arrows indicate TAF5 and TAF6. Figure 7B depicts the sequence of the full agfA gene of S. enteritidis 27655-3b and the corresponding predicted amino acid sequence. Figure 8 depicts a Western blot identification of proteins from Salmonella strains and other members of the family Enterobacteriaceae that are immunologically cross-reactive with AgfA of S. enteritidis 27655-3b. Lanes: 1, S. enteritidis 27655-3b; 2, S. hadar F9-1; 3, S. hamburg, 4, S. heidelberg, 5, S. infantis S41-16; 6, S. paratyphi B; 7, S.javiana; 8, S. mbandaka; 9, S. mikawasima; 10, S. typhi; 11, S. worthington; 18, S. enteritidis 27655-3b. The molecular weights (in thousands) of comigrating, prestained protein standards (Bethesda Research Laboratories) are noted. Figures 9A and 9B depict agarose gel electrophoresis of the results of PCR amplification of DNA fragments from various Enterobacteriaceae using oligonucleotide primers designed from the agfA gene of S. enteritidis. Lanes: 1, no DNA control; 2, S. enteritidis 27655-3b; 3, S. typhimurium SU453; 4, S. infantis S41- 16; 5, S. hadar F9-1; 6, S. agona, 7, S. newport; 8, E. coli C600; 9, E. coli HBlOl; 10, E. coli NG7c; 11, E. coli Gambia 3; 12, E. coli Vietnam 1 1; 13, Enterobacter aerogenes; 14, Citrobacter freundii 8090; 15, Shigella sonnei; 16, S. choleraesuis; 17, S. typhi; 18, S. paratyphi A subsp. durazzo ATCC 11511; 19, DNA fragment size markers prepared byMspl digestion of pBR322. Figure 10A depicts an autoradiograph of the hybridization of [-^Pi- labeled agfA gene probes derived by PCR from S. enteritidis 27655-3b TnphoA mutant 2-7f to representative panels of HGMF colony blots. Panel positions: A1-F20, E. coli strains; G1-G12, Citrobacter spp.; 11-116, Enterobacter spp.; J1-J5, Hafnia spp.; Kl- K15, Proteus spp.; L1-L7, Klebsiella spp.; M1-N3, Shigella spp.; N9-P20, Yersinia spp.; Q1-Q4, Aeromonas spp.; Q5, Boriella; Q6-Q7, Erwinia spp.; Q8-Q9, Providencia spp.; Q10-Q13, Serratia spp.; Q14-Q15, Acinetobacter spp.; Q16-Q17, Achromobacter spp.; Q18-Q19, Alcaligenes spp.; Q20, Serratia marcescens; R1-R12, Pseudomonas spp.; R3 and S1-T20, Salmonella spp.; G13-H20, 117-120, J6-J20, K16-K20, L8-L20, N4-N8, R13-R20, no bacteria applied. Figure 10B depicts an autoradiograph of the hybridization of [-^Pi- labeled agfA gene probes derived by PCR from S. enteritidis 27655-3b TrφhoA mutant 2-7f to representative panels of DNA dot blots. Panel positions: A1-A7 and B2-G7, Salmonella spp.; A1-A7, B2-C3, S. enteritidis isolates; C4-C6, S. berta isolates; C7-D4, S. pullorum isolates; D5, S. gallinarum; D6-E4, S. dublin isolates; E5, S. drypool; E6, S. eastbourne; E7, S. albany; Fl, S. anatum; F2, S. arizonae; F3, S. cerro; F4, S. choleraesuis; F5, S. dahomey; F6, S. florida; F7, S. gaminara; Gl, S. havana; G2, S. minnesota; G3, S. newport; G4, S. neinstedten; G5, S. tennessee; G6, S. typhimurium; G7, S. worthington; HI, Citrobacter freundii 8090; H2, E. coli; H3, Serratia marcescens; H4, Shigella sonnei; H5, Klebsiella pneumoniae 13883; H6, Enterobacter aerogenes; H7, Hqfnia alvei; II, Erwinia caratovora; 12, Proteus vulgaris; 13, Providencia sp.; 14, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; 15, Aeromonas hyarophila; 16, Aeromonas salmonicida: 17, Bacillus subtilus; Jl, herring sperm DNA; J2, Salmonella paratyphi A; Bl and J3-J7, blank. Figure 11A depicts an autoradiograph of the results of expression of the sefA, sefB and sefC genes in an E. coli in vitro transcription-translation system. Lane 1, pTZ19; Lane 2, pKXl; Lane 3, pSCl; Lane 4, delB15; Lane 5, delB23; Lane 6, delDIO; Lane 7, Western blot of the in vitro transcription-translation of pKXl developed using antisera generated against denatured SEF14 fimbrin. The size of the molecular weight markers is indicated on the left (10 3 M r ). Figure 1 IB is a schematic representation of the sef gene cluster showing the inserts of various deletion subclones used in the in vitro transcription-translation experiments. Figure 12 depicts a restriction map of the region of the S. typhimurium chromosome encoding tctDCBA. The position and orientation of the open reading frames of tctD, tctC and tctB and the tctA open reading frame are indicated by the underlying boxes and arrows. Preferred regions of tctC and tctB useful as Salmonella DNA probes are indicated by the cross-hatched boxes. Abbreviations: A, Apάl; Av, Avail; B, BglE; Bg, Bgll; Bs, BstEU; D, Drάl; E, £coRV; K, Kp l; N, Ncol; S, Sail; Sm, Smά ; Sn, SnαBI; Ss, Sspl; X, Xmri . Figure 13 depicts a PCR-mediated DNA amplification of 308-base tctC fragments, using primers TPP1 and TPP2, from representative Salmonella serovars and other Enterobacteriaceae. Lanes: 1, S. enteritidis 276SS-3b; 2, S. typhimurium V 1%-1; 3, S. infantis S41-16; 4, S. choleraesuis; 5, E. coli C600; 6, C. freundii 8090; 7, Shigella sonnei; 8, no DNA (control); 9, S. typhi; 10 and 17, DNA fragment size markers of 217, 238, 242, 309, 404 and 527 bp prepared by MspI digestion of ρBR322; 11, S. paratyphi A subsp. durazzo ATCC 11511; 12, S. enteritidis HWC989; 13, Shigella dysenteriae ATCC 29027; 14, Shigella boydii ATCC 8700; 15, Shigella flexneri ATCC 12022; 16, S. berta ATCC 8392; 18, S. pulloru ATCC 9120; 19, Enterobacter aerogenes; 20, Klebsiella pneumoniae 3883 ; 21 , Serratia marcescens. Figure 14 depicts an analysis of the serological cross-reactivity between the four fimbriae of S. enteritidis 3 b and their antisera. Panel A depicts a Western blot analysis of Factor Xa cut MalE'-SefD fusion (lane 1), purified SEF14 (lane 2), SEF17 (lane 3) and SEF21 (lane 4) with anti-SefD antiserum. Panel B depicts a western blot analysis of SefD with SEF14 (lanes 1 and 2), SEF17 (lanes 3 and 4) or SEF21 (lanes 5 and 6) antisera. SefA, AgfA and FimA are the subunits of SEF14, SEF17 and SEF21 fimbriae, respectively. In both panels A and B, the size (kDA) of the molecular weight markers is indicated on the left. Figure 15 depicts the nucleotide sequence of fimA of S enteritidis, and the corresponding predicted amino acid sequence. Detailed Description of the Invention The present invention provides methods and compositions for the detection of Salmonella. These methods and compositions include numerous isolated genes specific to Salmonella, vector constructs, numerous isolated proteins specific to Salmonella and diagnostic tests. These methods and compositions are described further below. Genes Specific to Salmonella A. Genes Generally The present invention provides isolated DNA molecules comprising the sefU2UjABCD gene cluster, the sefABC gene cluster, the sefU2Uj gene cluster, the sefA gene, sefB gene, sefC gene, the sefD gene, the sefUj gene, the sefU2 gene, the agfA gene, the fimA gene, the tctCBA gene cluster, the tctA gene, the tctB gene, and/or the tctC gene. Although one embodiment of each of these molecules is shown in Figures 2 to 7, it should be understood that within the context of the present invention, reference to one or more of these genes includes derivatives of the genes that are substantially similar to the genes (and, where appropriate, the protein (including peptides and polypeptides) that are encoded by the genes and their derivatives). As used herein, a nucleotide sequence is deemed to be "substantially similar" if: (a) the DNA sequence is derived from the coding region of a native gene of any Salmonella serovar and maintains substantially the same biological activity (including, for example, portions of the sequence or allelic variations of the sequences discussed above); (b) the DNA sequence is capable of hybridization to DNA sequences of the present invention under moderate, high or very high stringency {see Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, 1989); or (c) the DNA sequences are degenerate as a result of the genetic code to the DNA sequences defined in (a) or (b). Within the context of the present invention, moderate stringency means conditions such that an appropriate nucleotide sequence is able to selectively hybridize to nucleotide sequences from Salmonella and to conserved nucleotide sequences in other bacteria such as E. coli. High stringency means the nucleotide sequence is able to selectively hybridize to nucleotide sequences from Salmonella. Very high stringency means the nucleotide sequence is able to selectively hybridize to a single Salmonella species, such as S. enteritidis, S. dublin or S. gallinarum. B. sefUj. sefUi- se - se fC- se fi> genes and the sefU2UjBCD gene cluster In one aspect, the present invention provides the nucleotide sequences of the sefUj, sefU2, sefA, sefB, sefC, and sefD genes, which are located in a single cluster, the sefU2>U]ABCD gene cluster. As can be seen by reference to Figure 1, which is a schematic illustration and open reading frame analysis of the sefU2<UjABCD gene cluster, the sefB and sefC genes comprise an approximately 3.4 kilobase pair region of Salmonella DNA. In vitro expression directed by a 5.3 kilobase pair DNA fragment encompassing sefA, sefB and sefC indicated that the SefB and SefC proteins have an approximately 14 K, 28 K and 90 K Mγ molecular weight, respectively. See Figure 11A. The present invention preferably involves one or more of a sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, sefUj, or sefU2 gene. Further information with respect to the sefA gene and its products may be found in U.S. Application Ser. No. 08/054,542. See also Application Ser. No. (attorney's docket no. 920043.403C1), and Application Ser. No. (attorney's docket no. 920043.403C3). As noted above, these applications and all other references cited herein are expressly incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.) Experimental results with S. enteritidis indicate that sefB and sefC are not expressed in the absence of sefA. Primer extension analysis of sej. " ABC gene clusters revealed two major transcription start sites located upstream of sefA (Figure 12). Transcription of sefB and sefC is also initiated from the sefA promoter region. Secondary structure analysis of the mRNA transcript from sefABC predicted the formation of two stable stem-loop structures in the intercistronic region between sefA and sefB, which is indicative of differential regulation of sefA as opposed to sefB and sefC translation. The nucleotide sequences, and corresponding amino acid sequences, of sefB, sefUj and sefU2 are depicted in Figures 2A-2D and 3 A-3B. sefUj and sefU2 are overlapping open reading frames oriented in the opposite directions (i.e., encoded on opposite strands). sefD abuts sefC and a consensus Shine-Dalgarno ribosomal binding site sequence is just inside the sefC oτ f. No promoter is recognized immediately upstream of sefD; expression may be directed by the sefA promoter. C. agfA gene The agfA gene codes for a structural fimbrin protein composing very thin fimbriae, approximately 3-4 nanometers in diameter, that are highly aggregative and stable. The aggregative property of the fimbriae is believed to be due to its hydrophobicity. The gene product of the agfA gene, AgfA, is found in SEF17 fimbriae, and comprises an approximately 14-15 KA^r molecular weight protein. AgfA contributes to heavy pellicle formation in static cultures, colony hydrophobicity, and autoaggregation of cells in culture. SEF17 fimbriae are immunologically distinct from SEF14 and SEF21, as indicated by the lack of cross-reactivity with polyclonal antisera raised in rabbits against SEF14 or SEF21 (Collinson et al., Purification and characterization of thin, aggregative fimbriae from S. enteritidis," J. Bacteriol. 773:4773-4781, 1991). Figure 7A depicts the nucleotide sequence of an agfA gene fragment that was amplified from the S. enteritidis 27655-3b TxφhoA mutant strain and then cloned into pUC19. The bases underlined in the agfA sequence of Figure 7 A are common to portions of the PCR primers TAF1 and TAF2, which were used in amplification of this fragment. Below the agfA sequence in Figure 7A is the translated amino acid sequence. As discussed further below, the nucleotide sequences targeted by the diagnostic PCR primer pairs TAF3 and TAF4 (solid arrows) and TAF5 and TAF6 (dashed arrows) are also indicated in Figures 3 A-3B. The sequence of the full agfA gene of S. enteritidis 3b is shown in Figure 7B. The sequence depicted in Figure 7B reflects two nucleotide changes (at positions 69 and 75 of Figure 7B) from the sequence of Figure 7 A, but the changes do not alter the encoded amino acid sequence. D. tctA. tctB. and tctC genes, and the tcti. tctll and tctlll operons The tctA, tctB, tctC and tctD genes are located in the tcti operon, which is one of three operons for tricarboxylic acid transport within Salmonella spp. The other Salmonella tricarboxylic acid transport systems are termed tctll and tctlll. It is believed that the tricarboxylic acid transport system of Salmonella is lacking from certain other related genera, tcti and tct777 both encode proteins responsible for citrate transport and are induced by growth of Salmonella typhimurium on minimal media supplemented with citrate as a carbon source, tctll is normally not expressed. Each system demonstrates preferential transport of various tricarboxylic acids and different concentrations of the monovalent cations Na+ and K+. The transport of tricarboxylic acids, particularly citrate, are important to the intracellular survival of Salmonella, as such transport provides a means of scavenging nutrients from a host cell. Accordingly, mutants in these various tct systems, preferably in S. typhimurium or S. enteritidis, create attenuated strains of Salmonella capable of being taken into a host cell, and capable of persisting for a limited time, yet not able to proliferate within such a host cell. In a preferred embodiment, one or more of these tct mutants are coupled with a mutant unable to utilize succinate to provide a "back-up" system to assure attenuation. The nucleotide sequences for tctA, tctB and tctC, along with their corresponding amino acids, are depicted in Figures 4A-4B, 5 and 6A-6B, respectively. E. fimA gene fimA encodes the Salmonella typel fimbriae, which is also known in Salmonella enteritidis as SEF21 fimbriae. Prior to the disclosure of the subject application, Type 1 fimbriae were believed to be the only Salmonella fimbrial type implicated in pathogenicity. polyclonal antisera studies have indicated that Type 1 fimbrial antigens are among the majority of Salmonella serotypes. The sequence of the fimA gene of S. enteritidis 3b is shown in Figure 15. π. Vector Constructs Comprising the Gene Sequences of the Present Invention A. Vector Constructs Generally The present invention provides for the manipulation and expression of the above described genes by culturing host cells containing a construct capable of expressing the above-described genes, including substantially similar derivatives thereof. Numerous vector constructs, including all or part of the nucleotide sequences of a native or derivative sefUj, sefU2, sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, agfA, tctA, tctB, and/or tctC genes, as described above, can be prepared as a matter of convenience. Within the context of the present invention, a DNA construct is understood to refer to a DNA molecule, or a clone of such a molecule (either single-stranded or double- stranded), that has been modified through human intervention to contain segments of DNA combined and juxtaposed in a manner that as a whole would not otherwise exist in nature. Vector constructs of the present invention comprise a first DNA segment encoding one or more of the sefUj, sefU2, sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, agfA, tctA, tctB, and or tctC genes operably linked to additional DNA segments required for the expression of the first DNA segment. Within the context of the present invention, additional DNA segments will include a promoter and will generally include transcription terminators, and may further include enhancers and other elements. Mutations in nucleotide sequences constructed for expression of variant proteins preferably preserve the reading frame of the coding sequences. Furthermore, the mutations will preferably not create complementary regions that could hybridize to produce secondary mRNA structures, such as loops or hairpins, that would adversely affect translation of the mRNA. Although a mutation site may be predetermined, it is not necessary that the nature of the mutation er se be predetermined. For example, in order to select for optimum characteristics of mutants at a given site, random mutagenesis may be conducted at the target codon and the expressed mutants screened for indicative biological activity. Mutations may be introduced at particular loci by synthesizing oligonucleotides containing a mutant sequence, flanked by restriction sites enabling ligation to fragments of the native sequence. Following ligation, the resulting reconstructed sequence encodes a derivative having the desired amino acid insertion, substitution, or deletion. Alternatively, oligonucleotide-directed site-specific mutagenesis procedures may be employed to provide an altered gene having particular codons altered according to the substitution, deletion, or insertion required. Exemplary methods of making the alterations set forth above are disclosed by Walder et al. (Gene 42:133, 1986); Bauer et al. (Gene 37:73, 1985); Craik (BioTechniques, January 1985, 12-19); Smith et al. (Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods, Plenum Press, 1981); and Sambrook et al. (supra). The primary amino acid structure of the above described proteins may also be modified by forming covalent or aggregative conjugates with other chemical moieties, such as glycosyl groups, lipids, phosphate, acetyl groups, or with other proteins or polypeptides. Within a further embodiment, the above described proteins may be fused with other peptides that facilitate purification or identification of these proteins. For example, a protein can be prepared as a fusion protein with the FLAG polypeptide sequence (see U.S. Patent No. 4,851,341; see also Hopp et al., Bio/Technology 6:1204, 1988). The FLAG polypeptide sequence is highly antigenic and provides an epitope for binding by a specific monoclonal antibody, enabling rapid purification of the expressed recombinant protein. This sequence is also specifically cleaved by bovine mucosal enterokinase at the residue immediately following the Asp-Lys pairing. B. Expression Vectors One type of vector construct, known as an expression vector, can contain DNA segments necessary to direct the secretion of a polypeptide of interest. Such DNA segments can include at least one secretory signal sequence. Preferred secretory signals include the yeast alpha factor signal sequence (pre-pro sequence; Kurjan and Herskowitz, Cell 30:933-943, 1982; Kurjan et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,546,082; Brake, EP 116,201), the Pho5 signal sequence (Beck et al., WO 86/00637), the Suc2 signal sequence (Carlson et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 3:439-447, 1983), the α-2 plasmin inhibitor signal sequence (Tone et al., J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 702:1033-1042, 1987), the tissue plasminogen activator signal sequence (Pennica et al., Nature 307:214-221, 1983), the £. coli PhoA signal sequence (Yuan et al., J. Biol. Chem. 265:13528-13552, 1990), or any of the other bacterial signal sequences known in the art, such as those reviewed by Oliver (Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 39:615-649, 1985). Alternatively, a secretory signal sequence can be synthesized according to the rules established, for example, by von Heinje (Eur. J. Biochem. 733:17-21, 1983; J. Mol. Biol. 184:99-105, 1985; Nuc. Acids Res. 74:4683-4690, 1986). Secretory signal sequences can be used singly or in combination. For expression, a DNA molecule as described above is inserted into a suitable vector construct, which in turn is used to transform or transfect appropriate host cells for expression. Host cells suitable for use in practicing the present invention include mammalian, avian, plant, insect, bacterial and fungal cells. Preferred eukaryotic cells include cultured mammalian cell lines (e.g., rodent or human cell lines) and fungal cells, including species of yeast (e.g., Saccharomyces spp., particularly S. cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces spp., or Kluyveromyces spp.) or filamentous fungi (e.g., Aspergillus spp., Neurospora spp.). Strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are particularly preferred. Methods for producing recombinant proteins in a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic host cells are generally known in the art (see, "Gene Expression Technology," Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 185, Goeddel (ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1990; see also, "Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology," Methods in Enzymology, Guthrie and Fink (eds.), Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, 1991). In general, a host cell will be selected on the basis of its ability to produce the protein of interest at a high level or its ability to carry out at least some of the processing steps necessary for the biological activity of the protein. In this way, the number of cloned DNA sequences that must be introduced into the host cell can be minimized and overall yield of biologically active protein can be maximized. Suitable yeast vectors for use in the present invention include YRp7 (Struhl et al., Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 76:1035-1039, 1978), YEpl3 (Broach et al., Gene 5:121-133, 1979), pJDB249 and pJDB219 (Beggs, Nature 275:104-108, 1978) and derivatives thereof. Such vectors will generally include a selectable marker, which may be one of any number of genes that exhibit a dominant phenotype for which a phenotypic assay exists to enable transformants to be selected. Preferred selectable markers are those that complement host cell auxotrophy, provide antibiotic resistance or enable a cell to utilize specific carbon sources, and include leu2 (Broach et al., ibid), ura3 (Botstein et al., Gene 8:17, 1979), or his3 (Struhl et al., ibid). Another suitable selectable marker is the cat gene, which confers chloramphenicol resistance on yeast cells. Preferred promoters for use in yeast include promoters from yeast glycolytic genes (Hitzeman et al., J. Biol. Chem. 255:12073-12080, 1980; Alber and Kawasaki, J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 7:419-434, 1982) or alcohol dehydrogenase genes (Young et al., in Genetic Engineering of Microorganisms for Chemicals, Hollaender et al. (eds.), p. 355, Plenum, New York, 1982; Ammerer, Meth. Enzymol. 707:192-201, 1983). The expression units may also include a transcriptional terminator. In addition to yeast, proteins of the present invention can be expressed in filamentous fungi, for example, strains of the fungi Aspergillus (McKnight et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,935,349, which is incorporated herein by reference). Examples of useful promoters include those derived from Aspergillus nidulans glycolytic genes, such as the adh3 promoter (McKnight et al., EMBO J. 4:2093-2099, 1985). An example of a suitable terminator is the adh3 terminator (McKnight et al., ibid., 1985). The expression units utilizing such components are cloned into vectors that are capable of insertion into the chromosomal DNA of Aspergillus. Techniques for transforming fungi are well known in the literature, and have been described, for instance, by Beggs (ibid.), Hinnen et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 75:1929-1933, 1978), Yelton et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 57:1740-1747, 1984), and Russell (Nature 307:167-169, 1983). The genotype of the host cell will generally contain a genetic defect that is complemented by the selectable marker present on the expression vector. Choice of a particular host and selectable marker is well within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In addition to fungal cells, cultured mammalian cells may be used as host cells within the present invention. Preferred cultured mammalian cells for use in the present invention include the COS-1 (ATCC No. CRL 1650), COS-7 (ATCC No. CRL 1651), BHK (ATCC No. CRL 1632), and 293 (ATCC No. CRL 1573; Graham et al., J. Gen. Virol. 36:59-72, 1977) cell lines. A preferred BHK cell line is the BHK 570 cell line (deposited with the American Type Culture Collection under accession number CRL 10314). In addition, a number of other mammalian cell lines may be used within the present invention, including Rat Hep I (ATCC No. CRL 1600), Rat Hep II (ATCC No. CRL 1548), TCMK (ATCC No. CCL 139), Human lung (ATCC No. CCL 75.1), Human hepatoma (ATCC No. HTB-52), Hep G2 (ATCC No. HB 8065), Mouse liver (ATCC No. CCL 29.1), NCTC 1469 (ATCC No. CCL 9.1), SP2/0-Agl4 (ATCC No. 1581), HIT-T15 (ATCC No. CRL 1777), and RINm 5AHT 2 B (Orskov and Nielson, FEBS 229(1): 175-178, 1988). Mammalian expression vectors for use in carrying out the present invention will include a promoter capable of directing the transcription of a cloned gene or cDNA. Preferred promoters include viral promoters and cellular promoters. Viral promoters include the immediate early cytomegalovirus promoter (Boshart et al., Cell 47:521-530, 1985) and the SV40 promoter (Subramani et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:854- 864, 1981). Cellular promoters include the mouse metallothionein-1 promoter (Palmiter et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,579,821), a mouse Vj promoter (Bergman et al., Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 57:7041-7045, 1983; Grant et al., Nuc. Acids Res. 75:5496, 1987) and a mouse Vg promoter (Loh et al., Cell 33:85-93, 1983). Such expression vectors may also contain a set of RNA splice sites located downstream from the promoter and upstream from the DNA sequence encoding the peptide or protein of interest. Preferred RNA splice sites may be obtained from adenovirus and/or immunoglobulin genes. Also contained in the expression vectors is a polyadenylation signal located downstream of the coding sequence of interest. Suitable polyadenylation signals include the early or late polyadenylation signals from SV40 (Kaufinan and Sharp, ibid), the polyadenylation signal from the Adenovirus 5 E1B region and the human growth hormone gene terminator (DeNoto et al., Nuc. Acids Res. :3719-3730, 1981). The expression vectors may include a noncoding viral leader sequence, such as the Adenovirus 2 tripartite leader, located between the promoter and the RNA splice sites. Preferred vectors may also include enhancer sequences, such as the SV40 enhancer and the mouse 1 enhancer (Gillies, Cell 33:717-728, 1983). Expression vectors may also include sequences encoding the adenovirus VA RNAs. Suitable expression vectors can be obtained from commercial sources (e.g., Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif). Vector constructs comprising cloned DNA sequences can be introduced into cultured mammalian cells by, for example, calcium phosphate-mediated transfection (Wigler et al., Cell 74:725, 1978; Corsaro and Pearson, Somatic Cell Genetics 7:603, 1981; Graham and Van der Eb, Virology 52:456, 1973), electroporation (Neumann et al., EMBO J. 7:841-845, 1982), or DEAE-dextran mediated transfection (Ausubel et al. (eds.), Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., NY, 1987), which are incorporated herein by reference. To identify cells that have stably integrated the cloned DNA, a selectable marker is generally introduced into the cells along with the gene or cDNA of interest. Preferred selectable markers for use in cultured mammalian cells include genes that confer resistance to drugs, such as neomycin, hygromycin, and methotrexate. The selectable marker may be an amplifiable selectable marker. Preferred amplifiable selectable markers are the DHFR gene and the neomycin resistance gene. Selectable markers are reviewed by Thilly (Mammalian Cell Technology, Butterworth Publishers, Stoneham, MA, which is incorporated herein by reference). The choice of selectable markers is well within the level of ordinary skill in the art. As discussed further below, naked vector constructs can also be taken up by muscular cells subsequent to injection into the muscle of a mammal (or other animals). Selectable markers may be introduced into the cell on a separate vector at the same time as the sefUj, sefU2, sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, agfA, tctA, tctB, and/or tctC genes sequences, or they may be introduced on the same vector. If on the same vector, the selectable marker and the sefUj, sefU2, sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, agfA, tctA, tctB, and/or tctC genes sequences may be under the control of different promoters or the same promoter, the latter arrangement producing a dicistronic message. Constructs of this type are known in the art (for example, Levinson and Simonsen, U.S. Patent No. 4,713,339). It can also be advantageous to add additional DNA, known as "carrier DNA," to the mixture that is introduced into the cells. Mammalian cells containing a suitable vector are allowed to grow for a period of time, typically 1-2 days, to begin expressing the DNA sequence(s) of interest. Drug selection is then -applied to select for growth of cells that are expressing the selectable marker in a stable fashion. For cells that have been transfected with an amplifiable, selectable marker the drug concentration may be increased in a stepwise manner to select for increased copy number of the cloned sequences, thereby increasing expression levels. Cells expressing the introduced sequences are selected and screened for production of the protein of interest in the desired form or at the desired level. Cells that satisfy these criteria can then be cloned and scaled up for production. Numerous plant host cells known in the art can also be useful within the present invention, in light of the subject specification. The preferred prokaryotic host cell for use in expressing the gene sequences of the present invention is Salmonella. Other preferred host cells include strains of the bacteria E. coli, although Bacillus, Shigella, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces and other genera are also useful. Techniques for transforming these hosts and expressing foreign DNA sequences cloned therein are well known in the art (see, e.g., Maniatis et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1982, which is incorporated herein by reference; or Sambrook et al., supra). Vectors used for expressing cloned DNA sequences in bacterial hosts will generally contain a selectable marker, such as a gene for antibiotic resistance, and a promoter that functions in the host cell. Appropriate promoters include the trp (Nichols and Yanofsky, Meth. Enzymol. 707:155-164, 1983), lac (Casadaban et al., J. Bacteriol. 743:971-980, 1980), and phage λ (Queen, J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 2:1-10, 1983) promoter systems. Plasmids useful for transforming bacteria include the pUC plasmids (Messing, Meth. Enzymol. 707:20-78, 1983; Vieira and Messing, Gene 79:259-268, 1982), pBR322 (Bolivar et al., Gene 2:95-113, 1977), pCQV2 (Queen, ibid), and derivatives thereof. Plasmids may contain both viral and bacterial elements. Given the teachings provided herein, promoters, terminators and methods for introducing expression vectors encoding sefUj, fU2. sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, agfA, tctA, tctB, and/or tctC genes of the present invention into plant, avian, fish, and insect cells would be evident to those of skill in the art. The use of baculoviruses, for example, as vectors for expressing heterologous DNA sequences in insect cells has been reviewed by Atkinson et al. (Pestic. Sci. 25:215-224,1990). In addition, the use of Agrobacterium rhizogenes as vectors for expressing genes in plant cells has been reviewed by Sinkar et al., (J. Biosci. (Bangalore) 77:47-58, 1987). Host cells containing vector constructs of the present invention are then cultured to express a DNA molecule as described above. The cells are cultured according to standard methods in a culture medium containing nutrients required for growth of the chosen host cells. A variety of suitable media are known in the art and generally include a carbon source, a nitrogen source, essential amino acids, vitamins and minerals, as well as other components, e.g., growth factors or serum, that may be required by the particular host cells. The growth medium will generally select for cells containing the DNA construct(s) by, for example, drug selection or deficiency in an essential nutrient which is complemented by the selectable marker on the DNA construct or co-transfected with the DNA construct. Suitable growth conditions for yeast cells, for example, include culturing in a chemically defined medium, comprising a nitrogen source, which may be a non- amino acid nitrogen source or a yeast extract, inorganic salts, vitamins and essential amino acid supplements at a temperature between 4°C and 37°C, with 30°C being particularly preferred. The pH of the medium is preferably maintained at a pH greater than 2 and less than 8, more preferably pH 5-6. Methods for maintaining a stable pH include buffering and constant pH control. Preferred agents for pH control include sodium hydroxide. Preferred buffering agents include succinic acid and Bis-Tris (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). Due to the tendency of yeast host cells to hyperglycosylate heterologous proteins, it may be preferable to express the sefUj, sefU2, sefA, seJB, sefC, sefD, agfA, tctA, tctB, and or tctC genes of the present invention in yeast cells having a defect in a gene required for asparagine-linked glycosylation. Such cells are preferably grown in a medium containing an osmotic stabilizer. A preferred osmotic stabilizer is sorbitol supplemented into the medium at a concentration between O.l M and 1.5 M, preferably at 0.5 M or 1.0 M. Cultured mammalian cells are generally cultured in commercially available serum-containing or serum-free media. Selection of a medium and growth conditions appropriate for the particular cell line used is well within the level of ordinary skill in the art. HI. Proteins A. Proteins Generally As noted above, the present invention also provides isolated proteins. Within the context of the present invention, such proteins are understood to include the whole, or portions, of a gene product derived from one or more of the sefUj, sefU2, sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, agfA, fimA, tctA, tctB, and or tctC genes, or derivatives thereof as discussed above. Where the protein is a portion of a native gene or is encoded by derivative of a native gene, the protein maintains substantially the same biological activity of the native protein. The structure of the proteins corresponding to the sefUj, sefU2, sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, agfA, fimA, tctA, tctB, and/or tctC genes can be predicted from the primary translation products using the hydrophobicity plot function of, for example, P/C Gene or Intelligenetics Suite (Intelligenetics, Mountain View, Calif), or according to the methods described by Kyte and Doolittle (J. Mol. Biol. 757:105-132, 1982). B. Purification of Proteins Proteins can be isolated by, among other methods, culturing suitable host and vector systems to produce the recombinant translation products of the present invention. Supematants from such cell lines, or protein mclusions or whole cells where the protein is not excreted into the supernatant, can then be treated by a variety of purification procedures in order to isolate the desired proteins. For example, the supernatant may be first concentrated using commercially available protein concentration filters, such as an Amicon or Millipore Pellicon ultrafiltration unit. Following concentration, the concentrate may be applied to a suitable purification matrix such as, for example, an anti-protein antibody bound to a suitable support. Alternatively, anion or cation exchange resins may be employed in order to purify the protein. As a further alternative, one or more reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) steps may be employed to further purify the protein. Other methods of isolating the proteins of the present invention are well known in the skill of the art. A protein is deemed to be "isolated" within the context of the present invention if no other (undesired) protein is detected pursuant to SDS-PAGE analysis followed by Coomassie blue staining. Within other embodiments, the desired protein can be isolated such that no other (undesired) protein is detected pursuant to SDS- PAGE analysis followed by silver staining. C. Preparation of Antibodies In another aspect, the proteins of the present invention are utilized to prepare specifically binding antibodies. Accordingly, the present invention also provides such antibodies. Within the context of the present invention, the term "antibodies" includes polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, anti-idiotypic antibodies, fragments thereof such as F(ab')2 and Fab fragments, and recombinantly produced binding partners. Such binding partners incorporate the variable regions that permit a monoclonal antibody to specifically bind, which means an antibody able to selectively bind to a peptide produced from one of the sefUj, sefU2, sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, agfA, fimA, tctA, tctB, and/or tctC genes of the invention. The affinity of a monoclonal antibody or binding partner can be readily determined by one of ordinary skill in the art (see Scatchard, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 57:660-672, 1949). A variety of assays can be utilized in order to detect antibodies that specifically bind to the desired protein or peptide. Exemplary assays are described in detail in Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Harlow and Lane (eds.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1988. Representative examples of such assays include: countercurrent immuno-electrophoresis (CIEP), radioimmunoassays, radioimmunoprecipitations, enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assays (ELISA), dot blot assays, inhibition or competition assays, and sandwich assays, immunostick (dipstick) assays, simultaneous immunoassays, immunochromatographic assays, immunofiltration assays, latex bead agglutination assays, immunofluorescent assays, biosensor assays, and low-light detection assays (see U.S. Patent Nos. 4,376,110 and 4,486,530; see also Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, supra). Polyclonal antibodies can be readily generated by one of ordinary skill in the art from a variety of warm-blooded animals such as horses, cows, goats, sheep, dogs, chickens, turkeys, rabbits, mice, or rats. Briefly, the desired protein or peptide is utilized to immunize the animal through intraperitoneal, intramuscular, intraocular, or subcutaneous injections. The immunogenicity of the protein or peptide of interest may be increased through the use of an adjuvant such as Freund's complete or incomplete adjuvant. Following several booster immunizations, small samples of serum are collected and tested for reactivity to the desired protein or peptide. Particularly preferred polyclonal antisera give a signal that is at least three times greater than background. Once the titer of the animal has reached a plateau in terms of its reactivity to the protein, larger quantities of polyclonal antisera may be readily obtained either by weekly bleedings, or by exsanguinating the animal. Monoclonal antibodies can also be readily generated using well-known techniques (see U.S. Patent Nos. RE 32,011, 4,902,614, 4,543,439, and 4,411,993; see also Monoclonal Antibodies, Hybridomas: A New Dimension in Biological Analyses, Plenum Press, Kennett, McKearn, and Bechtol (eds.), 1980, and Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Harlow and Lane (eds.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1988). Briefly, in one embodiment, a subjeα animal such as a rat or mouse is injeαed with a desired protein or peptide. If desired, various techniques may be utilized in order to increase the resultant immune response generated by the protein, in order to develop greater antibody reaαivity. For example, the desired protein or peptide may be coupled to another protein such as ovalbumin or keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), or through the use of adjuvants such as Freund's complete or incomplete adjuvant. The initial elicitation of an immune response, may preferably be through intraperitoneal, intramuscular, intraocular, or subcutaneous routes. Between one and three weeks after the initial immunization, the animal may be reimmunized with another booster immunization. The animal may then be test bled and the serum tested for binding to the desired antigen using assays as described above. Additional immunizations may also be accomplished until the animal has reached a plateau in its reaαivity to the desired protein or peptide. The animal may then be given a final boost of the desired protein or peptide, and three to four days later sacrificed. At this time, the spleen and lymph nodes may be harvested and disrupted into a single cell suspension by passing the organs through a mesh screen or by rupturing the spleen or lymph node membranes which encapsulate the cells. Within one embodiment the red cells are subsequently lysed by the addition of a hypotonic solution, followed by immediate return to isotonicity. Within another embodiment, suitable cells for preparing monoclonal antibodies are obtained through the use of in vitro immunization techniques. Briefly, an animal is sacrificed, and the spleen and lymph node cells are removed as described above. A single cell suspension is prepared, and the cells are placed into a culture containing a form of the protein or peptide of interest that is suitable for generating an immune response as described above. Subsequently, the lymphocytes are harvested and fused as described below. Cells that are obtained through the use of in vitro immunization or from an immunized animal as described above may be immortalized by transfeαion with a virus such as the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). (See Glas y and Reading, Hybridoma 8(4):377-32>9, 1989.) Alternatively, within a preferred embodiment, the harvested spleen and/or lymph node cell suspensions are fused with a suitable myeloma cell in order to create a "hybridoma" which secretes monoclonal antibodies. Suitable myeloma lines are preferably defeαive in the construction or expression of antibodies, and are additionally syngeneic with the cells from the immunized animal. Many such myeloma cell lines are well known in the art and may be obtained from sources such as the American Type Culture Colleαion (ATCC), Rockville, Maryland (see Catalogue of Cell Lines & Hybridomas, 6th ed., ATCC, 1988). Representative myeloma lines include: for humans, UC 729-6 (ATCC No. CRL 8061), MC/CAR-Z2 (ATCC No. CRL 8147), and SKO-007 (ATCC No. CRL 8033); for mice, SP2/0-Agl4 (ATCC No. CRL 1581), and P3X63Ag8 (ATCC No. TIB 9); and for rats, Y3-Agl.2.3 (ATCC No. CRL 1631), and YB2/0 (ATCC No. CRL 1662). Particularly preferred fusion lines include NS-1 (ATCC No. TIB 18) and P3X63 - Ag 8.653 (ATCC No. CRL 1580), which may be utilized for fusions with either mouse, rat, or human cell lines. Fusion between the myeloma cell line and the cells from the immunized animal can be accomplished by a variety of methods, including the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) (see Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Harlow and Lane, supra) or eleαrofusion. (See Zimmerman and Vienken, J. Membrane Biol. 67:165-182, 1982.) Following the fusion, the cells are placed into culture plates containing a suitable medium, such as RPMI 1640 or DMEM (Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium, JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, Kan.). The medium may also contain additional ingredients, such as Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, e.g., from Hyclone, Logan, Utah, or JRH Biosciences), thymocytes that were harvested from a baby animal of the same specie ' s as was used for immunization, or agar to solidify the medium. Additionally, the medium should contain a reagent which seleαively allows for the growth of fused spleen and myeloma cells. Particularly preferred is the use of HAT medium (hypoxanthine, aminopterin, and thymidine) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). After about seven days, the resulting fused cells or hybridomas may be screened in order to determine the presence of antibodies which recognize the desired antigen. Following several clonal dilutions and reassays, hybridoma producing antibodies that bind to the protein of interest can be isolated. Other techniques can also be utilized to construα monoclonal antibodies. (See Huse et al., "Generation of a Large Combinational Library of the Immunoglobulin Repertoire in Phage Lambda," Science 246:1275-1281, 1989; see also Sastry et al., "Cloning of the Immunological Repertoire in Escherichia coli for Generation of Monoclonal Catalytic Antibodies: Construαion of a Heavy Chain Variable Region- Specific cDNA Library," Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 56:5728-5732, 1989; see also Alting-Mees et al., "Monoclonal Antibody Expression Libraries: A Rapid Alternative to Hybridomas," Strategies in Molecular Biology 3:1-9, 1990; these references describe a commercial system available from Stratacyte, La Jolla, California, which enables the production of antibodies through recombinant techniques.) Briefly, mRNA is isolated from a B cell population and utilized to create heavy and light chain immunoglobulin cDNA expression libraries in the λIMMUNOZAP(H) and λIMMUNOZAP(L) veαors. These veαors may be screened individually or co-expressed to form Fab fragments or antibodies (see Huse et al., supra; see also Sastry et al., supra). Positive plaques can subsequently be converted to a non-lytic plasmid which allows high level expression of monoclonal antibody fragments from E. coli. Similarly, binding partners can also be construαed utilizing recombinant DNA techniques to incorporate the variable regions of a gene that encodes a specifically binding antibody. The construαion of these binding partners can be readily accomplished by one of ordinary skill in the art given the disclosure provided herein. (See Larrick et al., "Polymerase Chain Reaction Using Mixed Primers: Cloning of Human Monoclonal Antibody Variable Region Genes From Single Hybridoma Cells," Biotechnology 7:934-938, 1989; Riechmann rt al., "Reshaping Human Antibodies for Therapy," Nature 332:323-327, 1988; Roberts rt al., "Generation of an Antibody with Enhanced Affinity and Specificity for its Antigen by Protein Engineering," Nature 328:731-734, 1987; Verhoeyen et al., "Reshaping Human Antibodies: Grafting an Antilysozyme Aαivity," Science 239:1534-1536, 1988; Chaudhary α al., "A Recombinant Immunotoxin Consisting of Two Antibody Variable Domains Fused to Pseudomonas Exotoxin," Nature 339:394-397, 1989; see also U.S. Patent No. 5,132,405 entitled "Biosynthetic Antibody Binding Sites".) Briefly, in one embodiment, DNA segments encoding the desired protein or peptide interest-specific antigen binding domains are amplified from hybridomas that produce a specifically binding monoclonal antibody, and are inserted directly into the genome of a cell that produces human antibodies. (See Verhoeyen et al., supra; see also Reichmann et al., supra.) This technique allows the antigen-binding site of a specifically binding mouse or rat monoclonal antibody to be transferred into a human antibody. Such antibodies are preferable for therapeutic use in humans because they are not as antigenic as rat or mouse antibodies. In an alternative embodiment, genes that encode the variable region from a hybridoma producing a monoclonal antibody of interest are amplified using oligonucleotide primers for the variable region. These primers may be synthesized by one of ordinary skill in the art, or may be purchased from commercially available sources. For instance, primers for mouse and human variable regions including, among others, primers for V Ha , V H t,, V Hc , V Ht j, C H ι, V L and C L regions, are available from Stratacyte (La Jolla, Calif). These primers may be utilized to amplify heavy or light chain variable regions, which may then be inserted into veαors such as IMMUNOZAP™(H) or IMMUNOZAP™(L) (Stratacyte), respeαively. These veαors may then be introduced into E. coli for expression. Utilizing these techniques, large amounts of a single-chain protein containing a fusion of the V H and V L domains may be produced (see Bird et al., Science 242:423-426, 1988). Monoclonal antibodies and binding partners can be produced in a number of host systems, including tissue cultures, barteria, eukaryotic cells, plants and other host systems known in the art. Once suitable antibodies or binding partners have been obtained, they may be isolated or purified by many techniques well known to those of ordinary skill in the art (see Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Harlow and Lane, supra). Suitable techniques include peptide or protein affinity columns, HPLC or RP-HPLC, purification on protein A or protein G columns, or any combination of these techniques. Within the context of the present invention, the term "isolated" as used to define antibodies or binding partners means "substantially free of other blood components." The antibodies and binding partners of the present invention have many uses. For example, antibodies may be utilized in flow cytometry to sort cells bearing such a protein. Briefly, in order to deteα the protein or peptide of interest on cells, the cells are incubated with a labeled monoclonal antibody which specifically binds to the protein of interest, followed by deteαion of the presence of bound antibody. These steps may also be accomplished with additional steps such as washings to remove unbound antibody. Labels suitable for use within the present invention are well known in the art including, among others, flourescein isothiocyanate (FITC), phycoerythrin (PE), horse radish peroxidase (HRP), and colloidal gold. Particularly preferred for use in flow cytometry is FITC, which may be conjugated to purified antibody according to the method of Keltkamp in "Conjugation of Fluorescein Isothiocyanate to Antibodies. I. Experiments on the Conditions of Conjugation," Immunology 75:865-873, 1970. (See also Keltkamp, "Conjugation of Fluorescein Isothiocyanate to Antibodies. H A Reproducible Method," Immunology 75:875-881, 1970; Goding, "Conjugation of Antibodies with Fluorochromes: Modification to the Standard Methods," J. Immunol. Methods 73:215-226, 1970.) The antibodies can also be used in blocking assays or for identification of receptors for Salmonella fimbrin or eukaryotic cells. IV. Diagnostic Tests A. Nucleic Acid Based Diagnostic Tests Another aspeα of the present invention provides probes and primers for detecting Salmonella. In one embodiment of this aspeα of the invention, probes are provided that are capable of specifically hybridizing to sefUj, sefU2, se > se B > se C. se fD> a gfo, tctA, tctB, and/or tctC genes DNA or RNA. For purposes of the present invention, probes are "capable of hybridizing" to sefUj, sefU2, sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, agfA, tctA, tctB, and or tctC genes DNA or RNA if they hybridize under conditions of either high or moderate stringency (see Sambrook et al., supra). Preferably, the probe may be utilized to hybridize to suitable nucleotide sequences under highly stringent conditions, such as 6x SSC, lx Denhardt's solution (Sambrook et al., supra), 0.1% SDS at 65°C and at least one wash to remove excess probe in the presence of 0.2x SSC, lx Denhardt's solution, 0.1% SDS at 65°C. Except as otherwise provided herein, probe sequences are designed to allow hybridization to Salmonella DNA or RNA sequences, but not to DNA or RNA sequences from other organisms, particularly other baαeria, including other genera of the family Enterobacteriaceae sequences. The probes are used, for example, to hybridize to nucleic acid that has been exposed from a cell in a sample. The hybridized probe is then deteαed, thereby indicating the presence of the desired cellular nucleic acid. Preferably, the cellular nucleic acid is subjected to an amplification procedure, such as PCR, prior to hybridization. Probes of the present invention may be composed of either deoxyribonucleic acids (DNA) or ribonucleic acids (RNA), and may be as few as about 12 nucleotides in length, usually about 14 to 18 nucleotides in length, and possibly as large as the entire sequence of the sefUj, sefU2, sefA, sefB, sefC, sefD, agfA, tctA, tctB, and/or tctC genes. Seleαion of probe size is somewhat dependent upon the use of the probe, and is within the skill of the art. Suitable probes can be constructed and labeled using techniques that are well known in the art. Shorter probes of, for example, 12 bases can be generated synthetically. Longer probes of about 75 bases to less than 1.5 kb are preferably generated by, for example, PCR amplification in the presence of labeled precursors such as [α- 32 P]dCTP, digoxigenin-dUTP, or biotin-dATP. Probes of more than 1.5 kb are generally most easily amplified by transfeαing a cell with a plasmid containing the relevant probe, growing the transfeαed cell into large quantities, and purifying the relevant sequence from the transfeαed cells. (See Sambrook et al., supra.) Probes can be labeled by a variety of markers, including for example, radioaαive markers, fluorescent markers, enzymatic markers, and chromogenic markers. The use of 32 P i s particularly preferred for marking or labeling a particular probe. It is a feature of this aspeα of the invention that the probes can be utilized to dαeα the presence of Salmonella mRNA or DNA within a sample. However, if the baαeria is present in only a limited number, then it may be beneficial to amplify the relevant sequence such that it may be more readily deteαed or obtained. A variety of methods may be utilized in order to amplify a seleαed sequence, including, for example, RNA amplification (see Lizardi et al., Bio/Technology 6:1197-1202, 1988; Kramer et al., Nature 339:401-402, 1989; Lomeli et al., Clinical Chem. 35(9): 1826-1831, 1989; U.S. Patent No. 4,786,600), and DNA amplification utilizing LCR or Polymerase Chain Reaαion ("PCR") (see, U.S. Patent Nos. 4,683,195, 4,683,202, and 4,800,159) (see also U.S. Patent Nos. 4,876,187 and 5,011,769, which describe an alternative deteαion/amplification system comprising the use of scissile linkages), or other nucleic acid amplification procedures that are well within the level of ordinary skill in the art. With respeα to PCR, for example, the method may be modified as known in the art. Transcriptional enhancement of PCR may be accomplished by incorporation of baαeriophage T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequences in one of the primary oligonucleotides, and immunoenzymatic detection of the produαs from the enhanced emitter may be efifeαed using anti-RNA:DNA antibodies (Blais, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:348-352, 1994). PCR may also be used in combination with reverse dot-blot hybridization (Iida et al., FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 774:167-172, 1993). PCR produαs may be quantitatively analyzed by incorporation of dUTP (Duplaa et al., Anal. Biochem. 212:229-236, 1993), and samples may be filter sampled for PCR-gene probe deteαion (Bej et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:3529-3534, 1991). Within a particularly preferred embodiment, PCR amplification is utilized to deteα Salmonella DNA. Briefly, as described in greater detail below, a DNA sample is denatured at 95°C in order to generate single-stranded DNA. Specific primers are then annealed to the single-stranded DNA at 37°C to 70°C, depending on the proportion of AT/GC in the primers. The primers are extended at 72°C with Taq DNA polymerase in order to generate the opposite strand to the template. These steps constitute one cycle, which may be repeated in order to amplify the seleαed sequence. Within an alternative preferred embodiment, LCR amplification is utilized for amplification. LCR primers are synthesized such that the 5' base of the upstream primer is capable of hybridizing to a unique base pair in a desired gene to specifically detect a strain of Salmonella harboring the desired gene. Within another preferred embodiment, the probes are used in an automated, non-isotopic strategy wherein target nucleic acid sequences are amplified by PCR, and then desired produαs are determined by a colorimetric oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA) (Nickerson et al., Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 57:8923-8927, 1990). Primers for the amplification of a seleαed sequence should be seleαed from sequences that are highly specific and form stable duplexes with the target sequence. The primers should also be non-complementary, especially at the 3' end, should not form dimers with themselves or other primers, and should not form secondary structures or duplexes with other regions of DNA. In general, primers of about 18 to 20 nucleotides are preferred, and can be easily synthesized using techniques well known in the art. PCR produαs, and other nucleic acid amplification produαs, may be quantitated using techniques known in the art (Duplaa et al., Anal. Biochem. 212:229-236, 1993; Higuchi et al., Bio/Technology 77:1026-1030). B. Antibody-based Diagnostic Tests Still another aspeα of the present invention provides antibodies, as discussed above, for deteαing Salmonella in diagnostic tests. Such antibodies are useful in a wide variety of antibody-based assays. As discussed above, exemplary assays are described in detail in Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, (supra); U.S. Patent No. 4,736,110; and U.S. Patent No. 4,486,530. These antibody-based diagnostic tests include the following tests. A fluorescent antibody test (FA-test) uses a fluorescently-labeled antibody able to bind to one of the proteins of the invention. For deteαion, visual determinations are made by a technician using fluorescence microscopy, yielding a qualitative result. In a preferred embodiment, this assay is used for the examination of tissue samples and histological seαions. In latex bead agglutination assays, antibodies to one or more of the proteins of the present invention are conjugated to latex beads. The antibodies conjugated to the latex beads are then contaαed with a sample under conditions permitting antibodies to bind to desired proteins in the sample, if any. The results are then read visually, yielding a qualitative result. In a preferred embodiment, this format can be used in the field for on-site testing. Enzyme immunoassays (EIA) include a number of different assays able to utilize the antibodies provided by the present invention. For example, a heterogeneous indireα EIA uses a solid phase coupled with an antibody of the invention and an affinity purified, anti-IgG immunoglobulin preparation. Preferably, the solid phase is a polystyrene microtiter plate. The antibodies and immunoglobulin preparation are then contaαed with the sample under conditions permitting antibody binding, which conditions are well known in the art. The results of such an assay can be read visually, but are preferably read using a speαrophotometer, such as an ELISA plate reader, to yield a quantitative result. An alternative solid phase EIA format includes a plastic-coated ferrous metal beads able to be moved during the procedures of the assay by means of a magnet. Yet another alternative is a low-light deteαion immunoassay format. In this highly sensitive format, the light emission produced by appropriately labeled bound antibodies are quantitated automatically. Preferably, the reaαion is performed using miαotiter plates. In a capture-antibody sandwich enzyme assay, the desired protein is bound between an antibody attached to a solid phase, preferably a polystyrene microtiter plate, and a labeled antibody. Preferably, the results are measured using a speαrophotometer, such as an ELISA plate reader. In an alternative embodiment, a radioaαive tracer is substituted for the enzyme mediated deteαion in an EIA to produce a radioimmunoassay (RIA). In a sequential assay format, reagents are allowed to incubate with the capture antibody in a step wise fashion. The test sample is first incubated with the capture antibody. Following a wash step, an incubation with the labeled antibody occurs. In a simultaneous assay, the two incubation periods described in the sequential assay are combined. This eliminates one incubation period plus a wash step. A dipstick/immunostick format is essentially an immunoassay except that the solid phase, instead of being a polystyrene microtiter plate, is a polystyrene paddle or dipstick. Reagents are the same and the format can either be simultaneous or sequential. In a chromatographic strip test format, a capture antibody and a labeled antibody are dried onto a chromatographic strip, which is typically nitrocellulose or nylon of high porosity bonded to cellulose acetate. The capture antibody is usually spray dried as a line at one end of the strip. At this end there is an absorbent material that is in contaα with the strip. At the other end of the strip the labeled antibody is deposited in a manner that prevents it from being absorbed into the membrane. Usually, the label attached to the antibody is a latex bead or colloidal gold. The assay may be initiated by applying the sample immediately in front of the labeled antibody. Immunofiltration/immunoconcentration formats combine a large solid phase surface with direαional flow of sample reagents, which concentrates and accelerates the binding of antigen to antibody. In a preferred format, the test sample is preincubated with a labeled antibody then applied to a solid phase such as fiber filters or nitrocellulose membranes or the like. The solid phase can also be precoated with latex or glass beads coated with capture antibody. Deteαion of analyte is the same as standard immunoassay. The flow of sample/reagents can be modulated by either vacuum or the wicking action of an underlying absorbent material. A threshold biosensor assay is a sensitive, instrumented assay amenable to screening large number of samples at low cost. In one embodiment, such an assay comprises the use of light addressable potentiometric sensors wherein the reaction involves the detection of a pH change due to binding of the desired protein by capture antibodies, bridging antibodies and urease-conjugated antibodies. Upon binding, a pH change is efifeαed that is measurable by translation into eleαrical potential (μvolts). The assay typically occurs in a very small reaction volume, and is very sensitive. Moreover, the reported deteαion limit of the assay is 1,000 molecules of urease per minute. EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1 Cloning of the agfA gene of Salmonella enteritidis An AgfA-negative T ψhoA insertion mutant of S. enteritidis 27655-3b, named strain 2-7f, was construαed (Collinson et al., "Thin, aggregative fimbriae mediate binding of Salmonella enteritidis to fibroneαin," J. Bacteriol. 775:12-18, 1993). The strain contains an agfA-TnphoA gene fusion. Stock cultures of strain 2-7f were prepared using cells from mid-exponential phase cultures that were mixed with 15% glycerol and then stored at -80°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth. Isolated colonies of strain 2-7f were obtained by inoculation of solid LB medium followed by incubation at 37°C for 24 hours. An individual colony was inoculated in 2 ml of LB broth contained in a sterile 18 mm x 150 mm test tube and the inoculation was incubated for 48 hours at 37°C under static conditions. For the purpose of isolation of DNA for amplification of agfA, cells may be equally effectively prepared by growth in LB broth, Colonization Faαor Antigen (CFA) broth, T (tryptone)-medium, other suitable proteolytic digest- based medium, or other medium suitable to support the growth of Salmonella. Cells may also be grown under aeration, such as by growth of the culture in an Erlenmeyer or other flask positioned on a rotary or gyratory shaking device. Preferably, the culture is grown at temperatures between 20°C and 37°C. Cells of strain 2-7f composing the pellicle at the surface of a static culture and cells in suspension were mixed by vortexing for 1 minute. Cells were harvested from 1 ml of this cell suspension (approximately 20 mg wet weight of cells) transferred to a 1.5 ml polypropylene microfuge tube and centrifuged (16,000 x g for 5 min. at 21° C). The pelleted cells were saved and subsequently resuspended in 1 ml of distilled water. The cells were lysed to release cellular DNA by boiling the 1 ml sample in a sealed microfuge tube for 5 minutes. The cell lysate was partially clarified by centrifugation (16,000 x g for 10 min. at 4°C) in a microfuge to pellet cell debris. The crude DNA preparation (supernatant fraαion) was used as a substrate for amplification of a 394 bp DNA fragment encoding the majority of the SEF17 fimbrin subunit, agfA.. Standard molecular cloning techniques were performed according to protocols described by Sambrook et al. (Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1989), or by incoφorating minor modifications thereto that are well known in the art. To facilitate cloning of an amplified agfA fragment, PCR primers were construαed to include restriαion endonuclease cleavage sites. The 5' PCR primer, called TAF1, was a 34 bp biased, degenerate oligonucleotide dGGCGGAAGCTTGAATTCGT A/C/T1GT[A C/T]C C[A/G/T]CA[A/G]TGGGG) (SEQ ID No. ), of which the 17 bases at the 3' end correspond to amino acid residues 2 to 7 of the AgfA N-terminus (the final nucleotide of amino acid 7 is degenerate, and therefore was not made a part of the primer). The amino acid sequence of the N-terminus had been previously determined by Collinson et al. (supra). The underlined sequences were required to create HinάΩI and EcόRI cleavage sites in the produα of DNA amplification. The 3' PCR primer, called TAF2, (dGGGAAAGGTTGAATTCAGGACGCTACTTGTG) (SEQ ID No. ), into which three nucleotide changes (underlined) were introduced to create an EcoRI site in the PCR produα, was complementary to the IS50L sequence residing at the junαion of TvφhoA generated alkaline phosphatase gene fusions. The amplified 394 bp agfA fragment was isolated after agarose (1.5%) gel eleαrophoresis using a 40 mM Tris- acαate, 1 mM EDTA buffer system and then purified using Gene Clean II glassmilk following the 'double Gene Clean' protocol recommended by the manufacturer (Bio 101 Inc., La Jolla, CA). Approximately 0.5 μg of the amplified agfA fragment was cleaved with the restriαion endonuclease EcoRI at a concentration of 5 units per μg of DNA. In addition, 0.5 μg of the plasmid vector pUC19 (Yannisch-Perron et al., "Improved M13 phage cloning veαors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mpl8 and pUC19 veαors," Gene 33:103-119, 1985) was similarly digested with Ec RI. After digestion, the DNA samples were extraαed once with 0.75 volume of buffered-phenol and then with 0.75 volume of chloroform to separate enzyme from DNA. The digested DNA fragments were precipitated in the presence of 2.5 volumes of 95% ethanol and 0.3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.4. Residual ethanol was removed from the DNA pellαs under vacuum. The DNA was dissolved in 20 μl of 10 mM TrisHCl - 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0. Ligation of agfA DNA fragments into pUC19 was conduαed in 50 μl ligation buffer using 7 units of T4 DNA ligase. Clones containing recombinant plasmids were obtained by transformation of competent cells of E. coli strain DH5α obtained from GIBCO BRL Life Technologies Inc. (Burlington, Ontario, Canada) with a sample of ligated DNA. Transformed cells were seleαed on solid LB medium containing (200 μ g/ml) ampicillin, 50 μM IPTG (isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside) and 0.005% X- GAL (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl-β-D-galaαoside). Ampicillin resistant colonies that contained the recombinant plasmids were identified by their white color. Recombinant plasmid DNA was purified from transformed cells using a modification of the standard, small scale, alkaline lysis technique described by Sambrook et al. (supra). Recombinant plasmids were purified from three individually isolated colonies. These three, apparently identical, plasmids were designated pAGFl, pAGF3 and pAGF4. In order to obtain a clone containing the full agfA gene, chromosomal DNA of S. enteritidis strain 27655-3 b was purified by CsCl gradient centrifugation and digested separately with HindTΩ. or Dral and analyzed by Southern hybridization at 65°C using a random-primer, [α- 32 P]dATP labeled agfA PCR fragment according to methods described by Sambrook et al. (supra). Following stringent filter washing at 60° C to 62°C as described above, a genomic fragment of approximately 3 kb was identified. HindTSI or Dral digested strain 3b DNA was fraαionated according to size by sucrose gradient centrifugation (Sambrook et al., supra). DNA fragments contained in the fraαion found to hybridize to the [ 32 P]-labeled agfA PCR fragment were ligated into M13mpl8 (Yannisch-Perron et al., supra) at the HindTΩ. site or Smάl site within the multiple cloning site at 12°C using 12 units of ligase and a total of 1 μg of DNA at a final concentration of 50 μg μl. Recombinant plaques prepared on a lawn of E. coli JM109 (Yannisch-Perron et al., supra), containing agfA were identified by dot blot hybridization (Sambrook et al., supra) using the [ 32 P]-labeled agfA PCR fragment. The recombinant M13mpl8 bacteriophage containing agfA were plaque purified in the replicative form, double-stranded DNA was purified and the insert fragments encoding agfA were cloned into pUClδ (Yannisch-Perron et al., supra), and transformed into E. coli strain DH5α as described by Sambrook et al. (supra). The recombinant plasmid composed of pUC18 and the approximately 3kb £>rαl fragment of strain 3b DNA was named pDAG6. The recombinant plasmid formed from pUC18 and the approximately 3kb HindUl fragment of strain 3b genomic DNA was named pHAGlO. The following Examples are offered by way of illustration, and not by way of limitation. EXAMPLE 2 Determination of the DNA sequence of agfA The DNA sequences of both strands of the agfA PCR fragment of Example 1 were determined by a modification of the enzymatic, dideoxy-termination sequencing method (Sanger et al., "DNA sequencing with chain-termination inhibitors," Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 74:5463-5467, 1977) using the universal forward and reverse primers and the reagents and protocols supplied in the Sequenase™ Version 2.0 kit (United States Biochemicals, Cleveland, Ohio). The sequence was confirmed by determining the DNA sequence of agfA contained in two of the independent plasmid clones. For this determination, an Applied Biosystems model 373A automated DNA sequencer and associated reagents, protocols and software (version 1.10) for thermal cycle sequencing (Applied Biosystems Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON) was used. The universal forward and reverse sequencing primers (Yannisch-Perron et al., supra) were used. The DNA sequence of agfA encoded on the overlapping Hindm and Drαl fragments cloned in pHAGlO and pDAG6 was determined on both strands using double-strand DNA sequencing techniques. Computer analysis of the DNA sequence for open reading frames and gene translation was performed using DNA Strider, version 1.1. The start of the open reading frame of the agfA gene encoding the mature AgfA fimbrin was recognized by comparison of the translated sequence to the N-terminal amino acid sequence of AgfA. The agfA PCR fragment DNA sequence is presented in Figure 7A. The full agfA gene sequence cloned into pHAGlO (and the agfA gene sequence from a separate clone, pDAG6), was determined on both strands using double- stranded sequencing techniques. The sequence is provided in Figure 7B. The translated DNA sequence of the single open reading frame corresponded precisely to amino acid residues 2 to 31 determined by N-terminal sequencing of AgfA (Figures 7 A and 7B). The amino acid composition of the translated sequence had a similar high glycine content (16%), high combined alanine, serine plus glycine content (37%), low basic amino acid content (4.5%), and nearly 30% asparagine plus aspartic acid content consistent with the total amino acid analysis of native AgfA fimbrin (8). Based on the estimated molecular weight of AgfA of 17 K M τ , and the expeαed molecular weight of the protein encoded in the 333 bp region of agfA, about 12 K - 13 K r , it appears that about three quarters of SEF17 fimbrin is represented in the fragment. EXAMPLE 3 Hybridization of the agfA probe to dot blots and colony blots of eubaαerial DNA The strains of Salmonella, other Enterobacteriaceae, and eubaαeria used for hybridization studies and PCR assays, and the sources of the baαeria, are provided in Table 1. Panels of Enterobacteriaceae in arrays on hydrophobic grid membrane filters (HGMF; Gelman Sciences, Montreal, PQ) were replicated (HGMF Replicator, Richard Brancker Research, Ottawa, ON) and grown as described by Sharpe et al. ("Technique for maintaining and sαeening many microbial cultures," Food Microbiol. 6:261-265, 1989). All baαeria were grown on LB medium or Nutrient broth medium at 37°C except isolates of Serratia marcescens and Erwinia caratovora which were grown at 25°C and Aeromonas salmonicida and Aeromonas hydrophila which were grown at 20°C. The agfA gene fragment represented in Figure 1 was hybridized to DNA from a total of 896 baαerial strains represented as colony blots on HGMF or as DNA dot blots on nylon membranes (Table 1). DNA dot-blot hybridization was used to sαeen 58 Salmonella isolates, 27 other Enterobacteriaceae spp. and 4 other eubaαeria. Chromosomal DNAs were purified from proteinase K-treated cell lysates by repeated phenol-chloroform extraαion followed by αhanol precipitation and resuspension (Sambrook et al., supra). The DNA samples were quantified by speαroscopy and 0.5 μg samples were applied to HyBond-N+ nylon membranes (Amersham Canada Inc., Oakville, ON) using a dot-blot manifold. The remaining 546 Salmonella serovars, 239 other Enterobacteriaceae strains, and 22 isolates of other eubaαeria were screened for agfA related genes as colony blots prepared on HGMF as described by Peterkin et al. ("Screening DNA probes using the hydrophobic grid-membrane filter," Food Microbiol. 6:281-284, 1989). The presence of Salmonella DNA was deteαed by hybridization with a mixture of total DNA prepared from S. enteritidis, S. typhimurium and S. berta and labeled with [α-32P]dATP by random-primer-directed DNA synthesis (Sambrook et al., supra). An agfA gene probe was similarly prepared by radiolabeling the 394 bp agfA PCR amplified fragment. DNA blots were prehybridized at 65°C in buffer (Sambrook et al., supra) containing 20 μg ml herring sperm DNA. Following hybridization at 65°C, the membranes were washed at a high stringency (0.2 X SSPE buffer (Sambrook et al., supra), 0.1% SDS, 63 °C) to maximize the signal difference between strongly and weakly hybridized baαerial genomic DNA samples. The hybridization results were recorded by autoradiography on X-OMAT AR5 film (Kodak, Rochester, N.Y.). Virtually all (603 out of 604, or 99.8%) Salmonella isolates tested hybridized to the agfA gene probe. These 603 Salmonella strains represented 90 serovars from 23 serogroups. The serovars surveyed included those most frequently responsible for gastroenteritis worldwide, S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium, other prominent causes of salmonellosis in North America and Europe, S. heidelberg, S. infantis, S. hadar, S. newport and S. agona, and for enteric fever and septicemia, S. typhi, S. paratyphi A, S. paratyphi B and S. choleraesuis. A single isolate of S. saint- paul did not hybridize to the agfA probe, although six other S. saint-paul isolates did hybridize. DNA preparations from 235 of 266 strains of other genera of Enterobacteriaceae and DNA samples from 26 unrelated eubaαeria did not hybridize to the agfA gene probe. The agfA gene probe hybridized very weakly to heterologous DNA on HGMF derived from 11 of 120 E. coli isolates, 2 of 12 Citrobacter spp. and 1 of 16 Enterobacter spp. The relatively negligible levels of hybridization to these isolates distinguished them from strongly hybridizing Salmonella DNA. No hybridization was deteαed to species of Erwinia, Hafnia, Klebsiella, Proteus, Providencia, Serratia, Shigella or Yersinia or several other eubaαerial species. Therefore, under highly stringent conditions, the agfA nucleotide probe in combination with HGMF technology demonstrated excellent inclusivity and exclusivity properties (Figure 10A). Alternatively, DNA dot blots prepared from 0.5 μg amounts of purified genomic DNA provided a more sensitive, but less praαical, means of screening using the agfA DNA probe (Figure 10B). Accordingly, weak hybridization was deteαed to DNA from 15 of 17 E. coli isolates, 10 of which produced GWPQ fimbrin deteαable by Western blotting, and to a single strain Shigella sonnei but not to other Enterobacteriaceae DNA samples. TABLE 1 Hybridization of agfA DNA probe to Salmonella and other Enterobacteriaceae S. ealing S. eastbourne S. eimsbuettel S. elisabethville S. enteritidis S. flint S.florida S. gallinarum S. gaminara S. give S. godesberg S. haardt S. hadar S. halmstad S. hamburg S. havana S. heidelberg S. indiana S. infantis S. isangi S. javiana S. Johannesburg S. kentucky HPB C3 11/11 S. landau HPB N 1/1 S. lexington HPB El 1/1 S. Idle HPB Cl 2/2 S. htchfield HPB C2 1/1 S. livingstone HPB Cl 7/7 S. london HPB El 4/4 S. manhattan HPB C2 1/1 S. mbandaka HPB Cl 27/27 S. meleagridis HPB El 2/2 S. minnesota TJT L + HPB L 2/2 S. montevideo HPB Cl 14/14 S. muenchen HPB C2 1/1 S. muenster HPB El 6/6 S. newbrunswick HPB E2 2/2 S. newington HPB E2 13/13 S. newport TJT C2 + HPB C2 5/5 S. nienstedten TJT C4 + HPB C4 1/1 S. ohio HPB Cl 11/11 S. oranienberg HPB Cl 6/6 S. orion HPB El 2/2 S. panama HPB Dl 2/2 S. paratyphi A. subsp. durazzo 11511 ATCC A + S. paratyphi B HPB B 3/3 S. poona HPB Gl 2/2 S. pullorum 9120 ATCC Dl + 10398 ATCC Dl + 19945 ATCC Dl + 89-2331 PVL Dl + _ 90-1175 PVL Dl + HPB Dl 2/2 S. reading HPB B 2/2 S. saint-paul HPB B 6/7 S. sandiego HPB B 1/1 S. schwarzengrund HPB B 18/18 S. senftenberg HPB E4 28/28 S. Stanley TJT B + S. taksony HPB E4 1/1 S. tennessee TJT Cl + HPB Cl 14/14 S. thomasville HPB E3 3/3 S. thompson HPB Cl 18/18 S. typhi HPB Dl 2/2 Proteus mirάbilis Proteus morganii Proteus rettgeri Proteus vulgaris Proteus sp. Providencia rettgeri Providencia alcalifaciens Providencia sp. Serratia fonticola Serratia marcescens Shigella boydii Shigella dysenteriae Shigella flexneri Shigella sonnei Yersinia enterocolitica Yersiniafrederiksenii Yersinia intermedia Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Other eubaαeria Achromobacter spp. HPB 0/2 Acinetobacter calcoaceticusJJPB 0/2 Aeromonas hydrophila Aeromonas salmonicida Alcaligenes faecalis Bacillus subtilis Bordetella bronchiseptica Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pseudomonas fluorescens Pseudomonas putida Pseudomonas stutzeri Pseudomonas sp. a ATCC, American Type Culture Collection; BBF, B.B. Finlay, Biotechnology Laboratory and Departments of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; GS, G. Sarlόs, University Medical School, Institute of Microbiology, Pecs, Hungary; HPB, Health Protection Branch of health and Welfare Canada, Ottawa; JT, J. Tomas, Departement Microbiologie, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain; LCDC, H. Lior, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Ottawa, Canada; LE, L. Emόdy, University Medical School, Institute of Microbiology, Pecs, Hungary; PVL, G. Thiele, Provincial Veterinary Laboratory of British Columbia, Abbotsford, Canada; TJT, T.J. Trust, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Canada; TW, T. adstrόm, University of Lund, Sweden; UVIC, Culture Collection of the Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Canada; WWK, W.W. Kay, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Canada. The strains designated as originating from source HPB' (Health Protection Branch of Health and Welfare Canada, Ottawa) were screened as panels of colony blots on HGMF membranes (32, 40) for hybridization to the agfA DNA probe only. b Hybridization of samples of membrane-bound bacterial DNA to the 394 bp agfA gene probe. The results of hybridization to dot blots of purified bacterial DNA are reported as positive '+', negative '-', or +/- for very weak hybridization. Hybridization of the agfA probe to DNA samples represented as colony blots on HGMF (HPB) panels are reported as the number of positively hybridizing strains per total number of strains tested. c DNA from these strains hybridized very weakly to the 394 bp agfA probe. EXAMPLE 4 agfA-bzsed PCR assays targeting Salmonella A set of oligonucleotide primers was designed for amplification of agfA from Salmonella sequences. Accordingly, primers TAF3 and TAF4 allowed Salmonella specific PCR amplification of a 261 bp agfA DNA fragment. Specifically, PCR primers TAF3 (dTCCGGCCCGGACTCAACG) (SEQ ID No. ), and TAF4 (dCAGCGCGGCGTTATTACCG) (SEQ ID No. ) targeted complementary strands of agfA in regions corresponding to AgfA amino acid residues 19 to 24 and 100 to 105, respeαively (Figure 1). As described above, baαerial DNA samples for PCR analyses were prepared from cells (20 mg wet weight) resuspended in 1 ml of distilled, deionized H2O and lysed by boiling for 5 minutes. Cell lysates containing DNA were clarified by centrifugation (16,000 x g, 5 min., 25°C). If not used immediately, the samples were stored frozen at -20°C. Amplification was carried out in a 10 μl reaction volume containing 1 μl of heat-denatured baαerial DNA solution, 5 pmol of each primer, the four deoxynucleotide triphosphates at 0.5 mM each, and 0.4 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla Calif.) in reaαion buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 20 mM KC1, 2.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 mg/ml BSA. Thermocycling was performed on samples contained in sealed glass capillary tubes inserted in an Idaho Technology air driven thermocycler for 30 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 5 s), annealing (68°C, 1 s) and elongation (74°C, 30 s). Annealing temperatures of 68°C to 70°C were used to provide Salmonella specific PCR amplification of an internal agfA fragment. Produαs of DNA amplification were separated by eleαrophoresis in 15% polyacrylamide gels and visualized by UV illumination following ethidium bromide staining. Under these conditions, in a survey of Salmonella, including strains of S. agona, S. choleraesuis, S. enteritidis 27665-3b, S. hadar F9-1, S. heidelberg ATCC 8326, S. infantis S41-16, S. newport, S. paratyphi A ATCC 11511, S. typhi and S. typhimurium SU453, TAF3 and TAF4 primed Salmonella specific amplifications of agfA DNA yielding fragments of approximately 260 bp (Figure 8), consistent with the prediαed size of 261 bp. Using TAF3 and TAF4 there was no amplification from DNA isolated from strains of E. coli, Shigella sonnei, C. freundii, Enterobacter aerogenes, Erwinia caratovora, H. alvei, K. pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris, Serratia marcescens or Providencia at annealing temperatures above 55°C. EXAMPLE 5 agfA -based PCR assays targeting Salmonella and other enteropathogenic baαeria A set of oligonucleotide primers was designed to amplify agfA -related genes present in other enteropathogenic baαeria. Accordingly, primers TAF5 and TAF6 allow amplification of approximately 92 bp DNA fragments from both agfA and related genes. Specifically, the 5' PCR primer was TAF5 (5 - dGGCGGCGGCAATA[G/A]TTCCGGCCCG-3') (SEQ ID No. ) corresponding to amino acid residues 14 to 21 of AgfA and the 3' PCR primer was TAF6 (5'- dCGGGCATCGCTTTGCAGAGGAAGCGC-3') (SEQ ID No. ) corresponding to amino acid residues 36 to 44 (Figure 7A). Baαerial DNA samples for PCR analyses were prepared from cells (20 μg wet weight) resuspended in 1 ml of distilled, deionized H2O and lysed by boiling for 5 minutes. Cell lysates containing DNA were clarified by centrifugation (16,000 x g, 5 min, 25°C) and stored at -20°C. Amplification was carried out in a 10 μl reaαion volume containing 1 μl of heat-denatured baαerial DNA solution, 5 pmol of each primer, the four deoxynucleotide triphosphates at 0.5 mM each, and 0.4 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) in reaαion buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 20 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 μg/ml BSA. Thermocycling was performed on samples contained in sealed glass capillary tubes inserted in an Idaho Technology air driven thermocycler for 30 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 5 s), annealing (55°C, 62°C, or 68°C, 1 s) and elongation (74°C, 30 s). Annealing temperatures of 68°C to 70°C were used to provide Salmonella specific PCR amplification of an internal agfA fragment. The produαs of DNA amplification were separated by eleαrophoresis in 15% polyacrylamide gels and visualized by UV illumination following ethidium bromide staining. In a survey of Salmonella, including strains of S. agona, S. choleraesuis, S. enteritidis 27665-3b, S. hadar F9-1, S. heidelberg ATCC 8326, S. infantis S41-16, S. newport, S. paratyphi A ATCC 11511, S. typhi and S. typhimurium SU453, at an annealing temperature of 68°C, TAF5 and TAF6 allowed amplification of a agfA fragment of approximately 90 bp from all Salmonella serovars listed immediately above, consistent with the expeαed fragment size of 92 bp (Figure 9). An approximately 90 bp DNA fragment was amplified efficiently from E. coli NG7c, and was inefficiently amplified from E. coli strains HBlOl, C600, Gambia 3 and Viet G as well as from a strain of Shigella sonnei. Under the same conditions, no amplification produαs were generated from E. coli clinical isolates 438Hf, B41-M, or Vietnam 1/1 or from Citrobacter freundii 8090, Enterobacter aerogenes, Erwinia caratovora, H. alvei, K. pneumoniae 13883, Proteus vulgaris, Serratia marcescens or a Providencia sp. At an annealing temperature of 55°C, this set of primers allowed amplification of a fragment of approximately 90 bp from Salmonella spp., E. coli strains HBlOl, C600, 438Hf, B41-M, NG7c, Gambia 3, Vietnam 1/1 and Viet G and Shigella sonnei. No PCR fragments were generated from C. freundii, Enterobacter aerogenes, Erwinia caratovora, H. alvei, K. pneumoniae 13883, Proteus vulgaris, a Providencia sp., or Serratia marcescens at the lower annealing temperature. EXAMPLE 6 Sequencing of the tctCBA gene cluster of Salmonella typhimurium The tricarboxylic acid transport (tcti) operon of Salmonella typhimurium LT2 was isolated on an 8 kb EcόRl-BamΗl fragment cloned into the veαor pBR322 to create the recombinant plasmid pKWIOl which conferred a citrate-utilizing (cit+) phenotype on E. coli MC4100 (Widenhorn et al., "Cloning and promoters of the Salmonella typhimurium tricarboxylate transport operon in Escherichia coli," J. Bacteriol. 770:883-888, 1988). pKWIOl was digested with the restriαion enzymes Kpril and Pstl to yield a fragment of 4.5 kb, containing the entire tcti operon, which was inserted into the M13 cloning veαor M13mpl8 (Yannisch-Perron et al., supra) to produce the recombinant clone KS1016. KS1016 was digested with the restriαion enzymes EcoRI and Hrødm (which cut only in the veαor DNA) to release the tcti fragment for subcloning into the M13 cloning veαor MWB2349 to produce MKS3. (Barnes et al., "Kilo-Sequencing: Creation of an Ordered Nest of Asymmetric Deletions Across a Large Target Sequence Carried on Phage M13," Meth. Enz. 707:98-122, 1983.) To facilitate determining the DNA sequence of tctCBA, the 4.5 kb EcoRI-H/wdiπ tcti fragment was subcloned from KS1016 into the Ml 3 cloning veαor MWB2341, whose multiple cloning site is oriented in the opposite direαion relative to the binding site of the universal DNA sequencing primer. This resulted in the creation of MKS11. The recombinant clones MKS3 and MKS11 were subjeαed to a procedure generating nested deletions (Dale et al., "A rapid single-stranded cloning strategy for producing a sequential series of overlapping clones for use in DNA sequencing: Application to sequencing the corn mitochondrial 18S rDNA," Plasmid - 73:31-40, 1985). Briefly, single-stranded recombinant M13 DNA was isolated by standard procedures (Sambrook et al., supra). DNA was linearized by HindH digestion following hybridization of the oligonucleotide WK-10, 5'-TGAATTAATTCCA CAAGCTTTTTTTTTTT-3'; to MKS3 (SEQ ID No. ) or WK-9, 5'- CGACGGCCAGTGCCAAGCTTTTTTTTTT-3' to MKS11 (SEQ ID No. ) to create a double stranded restriαion endonuclease cleavage site in an otherwise single- stranded molecule. The linearized DNA was subsequently degraded by the 3' to 5' exonuclease aαivity of T4 DNA polymerase. Samples were withdrawn at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90 and 105 minutes. The polymerase was inaαivated by treating the sample at 65°C for 2 minutes and the samples stored on ice. By withdrawing samples at different times, populations of DNA fragments with differing degrees of deletion were created. All time-point samples were pooled and the DNA was treated with terminal transferase in the presence of ATP to αeate a polyA tail. The deleted DNA molecules were hybridized with oligonucleotide WK-10 by heating to 65°C for 5 minutes, followed by slow cooling for 30 minutes, then Ugated by T4 DNA ligase for 1 hour at 21°C and overnight at 4°C. The ligated fragments were transformed into E. coli WB373 made compαent by the procedure of Mandel (Mandel and Higa, "Calcium dependent baαeriophage DNA infeαion," J. Mol. Biol. 53:159, 1970). Well-isolated M13 plaques were picked, and grown up overnight (Sambrook et al., supra) into 2X-YT broth. The size of each recombinant DNA molecule was estimated by agarose gel eleαrophoresis. From over 100 plaques analyzed, 35 recombinant phage representing delαions of 0.3 - 4.8 kb were seleαed for DNA sequence analysis. DNA sequences were determined using standard modifications of the enzymatic dideoxy termination method of Sanger et al. (supra). To resolve the sequence of regions that proved difficult to dαermine by standard protocols, the sequencing reaαions were performed using Sequenase (a chemically modified form of T7 DNA polymerase; US Biochemicals) and either deoxyinosine or 7- deazadeoxyguanosine in place of deoxyguanosine, or standard protocol sequencing reaαions were analyzed by wedge-gel eleαrophoresis. Whereas, most sequencing reaαions utilized the universal forward sequencing primer, specific internal primers were also used. The names and sequences of the internal primers used are: WWK-19 5'- GGGCGACTATCGCGTTA-3', WWK-20 5'-AGCCACTTGTAGCGGCC-3', WWK-21 5'-GGAAGTGCATTTTACGT-3', WWK-22 5'-CATGCTGCCAAGACAGG-3', WWK- 23 5'-C TTTGGATCTGCCAGGC-3', WWK-24 5'-GCGCCGTCATGATCGCC-3' (SEQ ID Nos. , , , , , and , respeαively). The sequences for tctA, tctB and tctC are shown in Figures 4A-4B, 5 and 6A-6B, respeαively. The sequences of tctA, tctB, and tctC were confirmed by automated DNA sequencing using an Applied Biosystems, Inc. Model 373A automated DNA sequencer and the reagents and protocols provided by the manufacturer for cycle- sequencing (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA). DNA oligonucleotide sequencing primers used for this purpose included: S'TCGGGATGCTGTTCGGCG 3 ' (SEQ. ID. No. ) 5 'CTGCCTGCGGAGTCGGC 3 ' (SEQ. ID. No. ) S'GTCGCAAGGCCAAGACCG 3 ' (SEQ. ID. No. ) S'GTGTATCGGCACCACCCTG 3 ' (SEQ. ID. No. ) 5'ccCGGCGATGTTCACCG 3 ' (SEQ. ID. No. ) S'CCAATACCGCGCCGGAG 3 ' (SEQ. ID. No. ) S'GCGGAGGCAATGATGAGCG 3 ' (SEQ. ID. No. ) 5 'TGCCGCCATACTCACAGCC 3 ' (SEQ. ID. No. ) S'TCTTGGCAGCATGATGGCG 3 ' (SEQ. ID. No. ) S'CTGGCAATGGTCGCCCG 3 ' (SEQ. ID. No. ) 5 'GCAATCAGCAGCGCAGC 3 ' (SEQ. ID. No. ) A restriαion map prepared from the DNA sequence appears in Figure 12. The Figure shows the positions of endonuclease cleavage sites for Apal, Avail, BglR, Bgh, BstTL, Dral, EcόRV, Kpril, Ncol, Sail, Smάl, SndBl, Sspl and Xmril relative to the open reading frames oftctC, tctB and tctC. DNA sequences encoding the TαC protein were recognized by comparison to the complete sequence of TαC protein; the prediαed amino acid sequence agreed with the amino acid sequence determined by peptide sequencing studies on the purified protein. The prediαed size of the TctB protein based on the nucleotide sequence agreed with the size of an expressed protein as determined by SDS-PAGE. EXAMPLE 7 tctC- and tctg-based diagnostic probes for Salmonella spp. Two fragments of the tcti operon were applied as diagnostic probes for Salmonella. One was composed of a fragment encoding the entire tctB gene. This probe was generated by PCR amplification using primers (TTB-1, 5'- ATGGATACCTGGATATATCTTTCTCAGGG'-3' (SEQ ID No. ); TTB-2, 5'- TATTTATTTAAGCCGGGTTT-3' (SEQ ID No. )) that are respeαively complementary to the 5' and 3' termini of the tctB gene, as depiαed in Figure 5. The second is 591 base pair fragment of tctC generated by the digestion of the recombinant plasmid pKW132 with the restriαion enzymes Smal and Dral. This digestion produces a fragment from nucleotides 1553 to 2144 of the tctC gene (see Example 6). These fragments corresponding to tctB and tctC were used to screen the dot-blots and HGMF panels of the baαerial strains tested in Example HI following random primer labeling with [α" 2p]dATP and incubation at room temperature for 3h. The DNA blots were prehybridized in buffer (Sambrook et al. supra) containing 20 μg / ml herring sperm DNA at 65°C, and then hybridized to one or the other of the diagnostic probes at 65°C. The blots were then washed under high stringency using 0.2 x SSPE - 0.1% SDS at 65°C prior to deteαion of hybridization by autoradiography on X-OMAT AR5 film. The tctB probe deteαed 609 out of 612 Salmonella isolates (99.5%). As shown in Table 2, of the 252 other Enterobacteriaceae tested with tctB, the positively hybridizing strains included 10 of 13 Citrobacter spp. 11 of 17 Enterobacter spp. and 2 of 6 Serratia spp. The tctC probe deteαed 609 out of 612 (99.5%). The tctC probe did not deteα any of the 250 non-Salmonella Enterobacteriaceae tested. Neither the tctB nor tctC probes deteαed any of the non-Enterobacteriaceae eubacteria that were tested. ~~ TABLE 2 Hybridization of tctB and tctC probes to Salmonella and related baαeria Baαeria Source(s) a O-Serogroup Hybridization of baαerial DNA to^ tctB PCR tctC restr. fragment fragment Salmonella serovars Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Aeromonas hydrophila Aeromonas salmonicida Alcaligenes faecalis Bacillus subtilis Bordetella bronchiseptica Pseudomonas aeruginosa Al Pseudomonas dimuta P eudomonas fluorescens Pseudomonas putida Pseudomonas stutzeri Pseudomonas sp. ^Abbreviations of source names: AGG, Agriculture Canada Research Station, Guelph, Ontario; ATCC, American Type Culture Collection; BBF, B.B. Finlay, Biotechnology Laboratory and Departments of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; CDC, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C.; GS, G. Sarlόs, University Medical School, Institute of Microbiology, Pecs, Hungary; HPB, Health Protection Branch of Health and Welfare Canada, Ottawa; JT, J. Tomas, Departement Microbiologie, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain; LCDC, H. Lior, National Enteric Reference Center of the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Ottawa, Canada; LE, L. Emόdy, University Medical School, Institute of Microbiology, Pecs, Hungary; MRD, Microbiological Research Division of Health and Welfare Canada, Ottawa; NRC, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario; PVL, G. Thiele, Provincial Veterinary Laboratory of British Columbia, Abbotsford, Canada; TJT, T.J. Trust, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Canada; TW, T. Wadstrόm, University of Lund, Sweden; UG, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; UVIC, Culture Collection of the Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Canada; WWK, W.W. Kay, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of 509 bp PCR fragment encompassing tctB or a 591 bpSmal-Dral restriction fragment derived from tctC to dot blots of purified DNA or colony blots on HGMF panels are reported as the number of positively hybridizing strains per total number of strains tested. Strains obtained from BBF, PVL, TJT, UVIC and WWK were screened by dot blot hybridization using 0.5 μg DNA sanφles bound to Hybond-N + membranes (Amersham Canada Ltd., Oakville, ON) as described by Doran et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2263-2273, 1993). Other strains were assembled on HGMF membranes and screened by colony blotting as previously described (Peterkin et al., Food Microbiol. 6:281-284, 1989). Hybridization of samples of membrane-bound bacterial DNA to the probe. The results of hybridization to dot blots of purified DNA are reported as positive '+', negative '-'. Hybridization of the probe to DNA samples represented as colony blots on HGMF (HPB) panels are reported as the number of positively hybridizing strains per total number of strains tested or 'nd', not determined. EXAMPLE 8 tctC-based PCR assays targeting Salmonella Oligonucleotides TTC1, 5 '-GGGACTGTGGTCGCCTTTTCCG G 3 ' (SEQ ID No. ) and TTC2, 5 '-CCGCCCTCAAAGGCA ACGTAGCGC 3 ' (SEQ ID No. ), were designed to allow an amplification of an approximately 180 bp DNA fragment specifically from Salmonella baαeria. Baαerial DNA samples for PCR reaαions were prepared from cells (20 μg wet weight) resuspended in 1 ml of distilled, deionized H 2 O and lysed by boiling for 5 min. Cell lysates containing DNA were clarified by centrifugation (16,000 x g, 5 min, 25°C and stored at -20°C). Amplification was carried out in a 10 μl reaαion volume containing 1 μl of heat-denatured baαerial DNA solution, 5 pmol of each primer, the four deoxynucleotide triphosphates at 0.5 mM each, and 0.4 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) in reaction buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 20 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 mg ml BSA. Thermocycling was performed on samples contained in sealed glass capillary tubes inserted in an Idaho Technology air driven thermocycler for 30 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 1 s), annealing (63°C-70°C, 1 s) and elongation (74°C, 30 s). The produαs of DNA amplification were separated by eleαrophoresis in 15% polyacrylamide gels and visualized by UV illumination following ethidium bromide staining. A 308 bp fragment of the tctC gene was amplified from S. arizonae, S. berta, S. choleraesuis, S. enteritidis, S. gallinarum, S. heidelberg, S. infantis, S. paratyphi A, S. paratyphi B, S. pullorum, and S. typhimurium but not from S. typhi. No PCR fragments were generated from E. coli, Proteus vulgaris, and Shigella spp. that do not utilize citrate or from K. pneumoniae, Providencia rettgeri and Serratia marcescens that do grow on citrate. Weak amplification of a 308 bp fragment was observed for citrate-utilizing species C. freundii and Enterobacter aerogenes when PCR was conduαed at a magnesium concentration from 1.5 to 15 mM. This band was eliminated when concentrations were greater than 18 mM. No tctC fragment was amplified from S. typhi, only the Salmonella serovar tested that does not utilize citrate, although sequences homologous to tctC and tctB were deteαed by hybridization. EXAMPLE 9 Sequencing and characterization of sef 2 fABCD from the se/gene cluster of Salmonella enteritidis A 5.3 kb Hwdm fragment carrying the SEF14 fimbrin structural gene and part of the sef gene cluster was subcloned from cos48, a recombinant cosmid carrying 44 kb of S. enteritidis chromosomal DNA, into pTZ19R to generate pKXl (Feutrier et al., "Cloning and expression of a Salmonella enteritidis fimbrin gene in Escherichia coli," J. Bacteriol. 770:4216-4222, 1988; Mϋller et al., "Fimbriation genes of Salmonella enteritidis," J. Bacteriol. 777:4648-4654, 1989). A series of overlapping deletion subclones of pKXl (DpKXl) were generated using pKXl linearized with EcoRI and varying degrees of DNAse I digestion according to the method of Lin et al. ("An improved DNA sequencing strategy," Anal. Biochem. 747:114-119, 1985), to create a collection of 50 nested deletions. The resulting linear DpKXl subclones were treated with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I and then blunt end ligated with T4 DNA ligase to recircularize the plasmids. The various DpKXl were transformed into E. coli XL-1 Blue (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using standard procedures (Sambrook et al., supra). The DpKXl were purified by standard alkaline lysis procedures (Sambrook et al., supra) and run on a 1% agarose gel. A series of DpKXl subclones separated by about 200 to 400 bp in size were chosen and named delAlO, delB15, delB23, delCl, delD5, delD8, delD9, delDlό, delD19, delEl, and delE21. Large amounts of these plasmids were purified by alkaline lysis for DNA sequencing. The ΔpKXl subclones were sequenced by the dideoxynucleotide chain termination method (Sanger et al., "DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors," Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 74:5463-5467, 1977) using T7 DNA polymerase (T7 DNA Polymerase Sequencing Core System, Deaza kit, Promega, Madison, WI) and deoxyadenosine 5'-[α ^S] triphosphate (New England Nuclear, Markham, ON) according to the manufacturers' specifications. The result of DNA sequencing reaαions were eleαrophoresed through a 6% polyacrylamide gel (45 W, 55°C-60°C) using a discontinuous buffer system (Carninci et al., "A simple discontinuous buffer system for increased resolution and speed in gel eleαrophoretic analysis of DNA sequence," Nucleic Acid Res. 75:204, 1989). Following eleαrophoresis, the gels were fixed in a solution of 12% methanol and 10% acetic acid for 15 min, and dried onto 3MM paper (Whatman Intl. Lt'd., Maidstone, England) under vacuum at 80°C for 2 hours on a Savant gel drying apparatus (Savant Instruments Inc., Farmingdale, NY). Dried gels were exposed to X- Omat K XK-1 film (Kodak, Rochester, NY) and the sequence read direαly from the developed films. Both DNA strands were fully sequenced, using the 17 bp reverse primer for the coding strand (GTCATAGCTGTTTCCCG) (SEQ ID No. ) and 12 custom made internal oligonucleotide primers (ULTRA Diagnostics Corporation, Seattle, WA) for the opposite strand. The sefA, sefB, sefC and sefD sequences are depiαed in Figures 2A-2D. The genes for sefUj and sef 2 were similarly sequenced on overlapping subclones and these sequences are depicted in Figures 3A-3B. The programs contained in Mac Veαor (Intelligenetics, Mountain View, CA) were used to determine the order of the overlapping DNA sequences. DNA Strider™ version 1.1 was used to identify the open reading frames for sefA, sefB and sefC, which were prediαed to encode polypeptides of 14,436 r, 28,012 r and 90,268 Mr, respeαively. The open reading frames for sefUj and efU2 and sefD were similarly recognized. The prediαed amino acid sequences of the SefA, SefB and SefC proteins were compared to proteins listed in the GenBank (release #66.0), SWISS- PROT (release #16.0), and GENPEPT (release #64.3) data bases and the MACAW program (NCBI, Bethesda, MD) to align regions of local similarity among proteins exhibiting similarity. Computer analysis showed that the gene sefA encodes a novel protein whose prediαed Mr, and amino acid composition match those reported previously by us for the SEF14 fimbrin (Feutrier et al. 1986, supra). Moreover, the first 60 prediαed amino acids are identical to the N-terminal amino acid sequence reported for the SEF14 fimbrin (Feutrier et al. 1986, supra). These results demonstrate that sefA encodes the structural subunit of SEF14 fimbriae, SefA. The adjacent downstream gene, sefB, encodes a fimbrial periplasmic chaperone protein. sefC, the gene immediately downstream of sefB, encodes a fimbrial outer membrane protein that contains nine putative membrane-spanning domains. Upstream open reading frames, sefUj and sefU2, are of unknown funαion. The nucleotide sequence of DNA immediately downstream of sefABC revealed a fourth open reading frame (ORF) designated sefD. This gene had the same translational polarity as sefABC (Figure 1). In faα, the AUG start codon for sefD overlapped the UGA stop codon of sefC. The gene organization of the gene cluster, has been confirmed on the chromosome by Southern blot analysis of Kpnl digested S. enteritidis 3b chromosomal DNA hybridized with sefA and sefD specific probes. Preceding the sefD ORF by 8 bp was a consensus Shine-Dalgarno sequence for translation initiation (GGAG). The sefD ORF was 447 bp and the prediαed molecular weight of the encoded protein, designated SefD, was 16,722 Dal tons. The prediαed amino acid sequence of SefD had a putative signal peptidase cleavage site between Ser-24 and Ser-25 as determined by the method of von Heijne (1984). The presence of a putative leader sequence suggested that the protein was exported from the cytoplasm to either the periplasmic space or the outer membrane. To confirm that sefABC encoded proteins of the prediαed sizes, proteins were translated in vitro from pKXl. The plasmid-encoded proteins were labeled with [35s]-mαhionine using a cell-free coupled transcription-translation system (Prokaryotic DNA-Direαed Transcription-Translation System Kit, Amersham, Oakville, ON) according to the manufacturers' instruαions. Plasmids carrying either the 5.3 kb fragment of the sef operon or deletions thereof (delB 15, delB23, delDIO) were used as DNA templates (Figure 11B). Plasmids purified by alkaline lysis (Sambrook et al., supra) were incubated with the other reaαion components in a final reaαion volume of 30 μl and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Unlabeled methionine (5 μl) was added, the mixture was incubated a further 5 min and then the reaαion was terminated by placing the reactions at 0°C. Ten μl of the reaαion mixture was added to 2x Laemmli sample buffer (Laemmli, "Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of baαeriophage T4," Nature 227:680-685, 1970) and then subjeαed to microdialysis (Marusyk and Sergent, "A simple method of dialysis of small volume samples," Anal. Biochem. 705:403-404, 1989) on Millipore filters (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) for 10 to 15 min prior to SDS-PAGE analysis on 12% gels poured with a 5% stacking gel (Laemmli, supra). The acrylamide gel was fixed for 30 min in 7% acetic acid, dried onto 3MM paper for 1 hour at 80°C and then exposed to X-Omat-AR5 film (Kodak, Rochester, NY) to visualize the labeled proteins. Several translation produαs were identified (Figure 11 A, lane 2). The 14KMr protein was identified on Western blots as SefA (Figure 11 A, lane 7). The 90KMr protein was identified as SefC. The 27KMr protein was identified as SefB. The 70K, 44K and 40KMr bands were likely minor degradation produαs of SefC because these bands were absent when pSCl, which contained a deletion in sefC, was used as the template (Figure 11 A, lanes 2 and 3). The 16KMr band seemed to be a minor degradation produα of SefB as this band remained when pSCl was used as a template (Figure 11 A, lanes 2, 3). When the three DNasel deletion subclones, delB15, delB23 and delDIO, were each used as templates, the bands for SefB, SefC and their minor degradation produαs were absent (Figure 11 A, lanes 4-6) indicating sefA and/or its upstream region is necessary for the expression of sefB and sefC, as was prediαed from the DNA sequence analysis (Figures 1, 2). To confirm that translation of SefB and SefC was dependent on the presence of sefA and/or the region upstream of sefA, the transcription start sites for sefA, sefB and sefC were determined. Primer extension studies consistently revealed transcription start sites immediately upstream of sefA. These included two major extension produαs as well as several minor ones (Figure 11-3). When the primer extension reaαion was performed at 50°C, a temperature expeαed to destabilize secondary structures, reverse transcriptase still stopped at all the sites with the same frequency suggesting that stem-loop structures were not blocking the migration of reverse transcriptase. No transcription start sites could be found immediately upstream of sefB or sefC. These results indicated that the 5' end of the mRNA transcript of sefABC was initiated upstream of sefA. EXAMPLE 10 SefD-based diagnostic probes for Salmonella spp. SefD was expressed as a MalE'-SefD fusion protein (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). Purified SefD, obtained by cleaving the fusion protein and eluting SefD from SDS polyacrylamide gels, was used to raise polyclonal antisera. Western blot analysis of SefD produαion in S. enteritidis revealed that the protein migrated at approximately 18,000 M r and that the protein was expressed in large quantities. This result suggested that SefD was a structural protein. Since S. enteritidis produces three other known fimbriae, SEF14, SEF17 and SEF21, further Western blot studies were performed to determine if SefD was serologically distinα from the fimbrins of these other fimbriae. Western blot analysis revealed that the purified fimbriae SEF14, SEF17, and SEF 21 did not reaα with polyclonal antisera raised to SefD (Figure 14). Similarly, purified SefD did not reaα with immune sera raised against purified SEF 14 (SefA), SEF17 (AgfA), or SEF21 (FimA). In lane 1 of Figure 14, two high MW bands were deteαed in addition to the expeαed 18 kDa band. The anti-SefD antisera was generated using the purified 18 kDa, Faαor Xa cleavage produα which consisted of SefD plus 4 amino acid residues from MalE 1 (44 kDa) and the uncleaved MalE'-SefD fusion (70 kDa). In Figure 14, the lanes labeled SefD contained Faαor Xa cleaved MalE'-SefD. In lane 5, two bands were present due to αoss-reaαivity of anti-SEF21 with MalE' (44 kDa) released by the Faαor Xa cleavage and with the MalE' in the fusion protein (70 kDa) that was not completely cleaved with Faαor Xa. Anti-SEF21 did not cross reaα with SefD since an 18 kDa band was not deteαed. SefD was localized to the outer cell surface by immunogold eleαron microscopy using polyclonal immune sera raised to affinity purified, recombinant SefD. These studies revealed filamentous, immunogold-labeled structures resembling fimbriae on the surface of S. enteritidis 3b cells. Thus, SefD was concluded to be the major subunit of these fimbriae-like structures designated SEF 18 (S. enteritidis fimbriae-like proteins composed of 18,000 M r subunits). Interestingly, SEF 18 was often concentrated at the junαion of two adjacent cells or found between cells. Thus, SefD is serologically distinα from SefA, AgfA, and FimA and morphologically distinα from SEF14, SEF17, and SEF21. Furthermore, the SEF14 gene cluster encodes two unique fimbrin-like proteins which are assembled into two distinct cell surface structures, SEF14 and SEF18. PCR amplified sefD gene was hybridized to DNA from a total of 73 baαerial strains represented as DNA dot blots on nylon membranes under high stringency conditions (Table 3). The sefD gene probe hybridized to all members of the family Enterobacteriaceae tested with the exception of Serratia marcescens. Strong hybridization signals were obtained with DNA isolated from S. enteritidis, S. dublin, S. pullorum, S. gallinarum, and S. berta, as well as with DNA from Klebsiella pneumoniae and Shigella sonnei. DNA isolated from various E. coli strains and the other Salmonella species hybridized to the sefD probe with moderate intensity whereas DNA isolated from Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Erwinia, Hqfhia, Providencia, Proteus and Shigella sonnei hybridized weakly to the sefD probe. DNA preparations from strains of other eubaαeria did not hybridize to the sefD probe (Table 3). Proteus vulgaris and Providencia rettgeri produced an immunologically αoss-reaαive band that migrated with an apparent MW of 17,000. Those strains negative for sefD by DNA dot blot analysis were also negative for SefD produαion as dαermined by Western blot analysis (Table 3). Subsequent immunogold EM studies indicated that SEF 18 fimbriae-like structures were also produced on the surface of E. coli. The apparent morphology and distribution of the immunogold labeled structures on these strains varied from filamentous structures of variable length radiating from the cell to amorphous structures. These structures lacked the uniform length and rigid, channeled morphology of Type 1 fimbriae. TABLE 3 The distribution of sefD and SefD among Salmonella isolates and other eubaαeria Baαerial Strains Source 3 Serogroup SefD cross- Hybrid- Species reaαive ization c to protein* 5 sefD probe Salmonella spp. S. albany TJT C3 + S. anatum UVic El nt S. arizonae TJT + S. berta 8392 ATCC Dl + 89-4065 PVL Dl nt 90-1271 PVL Dl nt -H- S. bovis- TJT C2 + morbificans S. cerro TJT K + S. choleraesuis BBF Cl + S. dahomey TJT X + S. drypool UVic E2 + S. dublin 15480 ATCC Dl + 89-3320 PVL Dl nt 89-3349 PVL Dl nt 89-4189 PVL Dl nt 90-243 PVL Dl nt 90-1176 PVL Dl nt S. eastbourne UVic Dl + S. enteritidis 27655-3b TW Dl + 27655-3a TW Dl nt 27036-211 TW Dl + 809 LCDC Dl nt 813 LCDC Dl nt 907 LCDC Dl nt 913 LCDC Dl nt 914 LCDC Dl nt 930 LCDC Dl nt 939 LCDC Dl nt 955 LCDC Dl nt 972 LCDC Dl nt 4931 ATCC Dl + 13076 ATCC Dl nt 31194 ATCC Dl nt 89-2749 PVL Dl nt JTSel JT Dl nt S.florida TJT H + S. gallinarum 9184 ATCC Dl + G2 G2 + Cl + Dl + nt C2 + nt L + ++ C2 + ++ C2 + ++ Cl + nt Dl + Dl nt Dl nt Dl nt Dl nt Cl + Dl nt B + B + B nt B + nt B nt B nt B + G2 + Other Enterobacteriaceae Citrobacter + + + + + + + -Hi¬ + nt nt + + + + + + + + + + + +d + Providencia rettgeri UVic + Serratia marcescens UVic Shigella boydii UVic Shigella aysenteriae UVic Shigella flexneri UVic Shigella sonnei UVic Other eubacteria Aeromonas hydrophila TJT Aeromonas salmonicida WWK Bacillus subtilis UVic Pseudomonas aeruginosa UVic Staphylococcus UVic - nt °ATCC, American Type Culture Collection; BBF, B.B. Finlay, Biotechnology Laboratory and Departments of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; JT, J. Tomas, Departement Microbiologie, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain; LCDC, H. Lior, National Enteric Reference Center of the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Ottawa, Canada; LE, L. Emόdy, University Medical School, Institute of Microbiology, Pecs, Hungary; PVL, G. Thiele, Provincial Veterinary Laboratory of British Columbia, Abbotsford, Canada; TJT, T.J. Trust, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Canada; TW, T. Wadstrόm, University of Lund, Sweden; UVic, Culture Collection of the Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Canada; WWK, W.W. Kay, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Canada; ^Strains grown aerobically overnight in LB were screened for immunoreactive SefD proteins was recorded as positive (+), negative (-) or not tested (nt). ^Hybridization of membrane-bound bacterial DNA to the 442-bp sefD probe. The results of the hybridization are reported as weakly (+), moderately (++), or strongly (+++) positive or negative "The SefD immunologically cross-reactive band migrated with an apparent MW of 17,000 rather than with an apparent MW of 18,000 as observed with S. enteritidis 27655-3b SefD fimbrin. EXAMPLE 11 sefB or sefC based PCR assays for deteαion of S. enteritidis. S. berta. S. dublin. S. gallinarum and S. pullorum The procedure described in Example 4 of resuspending cells in distilled water and briefly boiling them was found to be an eflfeαive method of cell lysis that permitted access to the chromosomal DNA for amplification. The primers for the PCR were a 24-mer and a 21-mer as follows. 5'-GATACTGCTGAACGTAGAAGG-3' (21 mer; SEQ ID No. ); 5'-GCGTAAATCAGCATCTGCAGTAGC-3' (24 mer; SEQ ID No. ). Amplification was carried out in a 10 μl reaαion volume containing 1 μl of heat-denatured baαerial DNA solution, 5 pmol of each primer, the four deoxynucleotide triphosphates at 0.5 mM each, and 0.4 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) in reaαion buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 20 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 mg ml BSA. Thermocycling was performed on samples contained in sealed glass capillary tubes inserted in an Idaho Technology air driven thermocycler for 30 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 1 s), annealing (55°C, 1 s) and elongation (74°C, 21 s). The produαs of DNA amplification were separated by eleαrophoresis in 15% polyacrylamide gels and visualized by UV illumination following ethidium bromide staining. The PCR assay deteαed less than 1 pg of target chromosomal DNA in the presence of a 106 fold excess of DNA from a wide variety of other Enterobacteriaceae including strains of£. coli, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Shigella and Serratia spp. This represents a detection limit of 1 to 10 cells using as an assay the visualization of PCR produαs by ethidium bromide staining of samples of amplified DNA eleαrophoresed in agarose gels (Figure 14). The signal strength of the assay was increased by many orders of magnitude using the specific DNA probes described in Example 14 to deteα the presence of amplified sefA gene fragments. Hybridization of PCR amplified S. enteritidis sefB and sefC genes to DNA dot blot panels representing approximately 600 isolates of Salmonella and approximately 300 isolates of other Enterobacteriaceae (for a general list of the isolates, see Table 1) under stringent conditions showed that the distribution of the sefB and sefC genes were limited to isolates of S. enteritiώs, S. berta, S. dublin, S. gallinarum and S. pullorum. PCR assays reliant upon DNA primers designed from the terminal sequences of seβ (targαing TTTTTTTACTTTCCGAAGA' (SEQ ID No. ) and • CTAATAATCTCTTATAATT' (SEQ ID No. )) and sefC (targαing 'AGTCGAAATTATATTGTCT (SEQ ID No. ) and CATTTGCACACTCCATTT' (SEQ ID No. )) of S. enteritidis were conduαed as outlined above. The sefB and sefC genes amplified well from S. berta, S. dublin, S. enteritidis, S. gallinarum or S. pullorum. EXAMPLE 12 Antibodv-based assay for deteαion of SEF 17 or SEF 18 Crude IgG was first prepared by caprylic acid precipitation of extraneous serum proteins as outlined in Harlow and Lane, supra (Antibodies; A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor, 1988). Pure IgG is prepared by Protein A affinity chromatography according to established methods for adsorption and elution of rabbit IgG. Purity is checked by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel eleαrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The purified IgG was passively cross adsorbed against other (non- Salmonella) Enterobacteriaceae. The cross adsorbed IgG is chemically coupled to the enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP) by the method of Nakane and Kawaoi (J. Histochem. Cytochem. 22:1084, 1974). Twelve well microtiter strips are coated with 100 μl/well of cross- adsorbed rabbit anti-SEF17 or anti-SEF18 at a concentration of 10 μg/ml in 50 mM carbonate/bicarbonate buffer pH 9.6. The strips are incubated overnight at 4°C or 3 hours at 37°C. The strips are washed 5 times with 300 μl of phosphate buffered saline pH 7/0.05% (Tween 20), then blocked for 1 hour with 300 μl/well of PBS pH 7/0.05% Tween 20/5% glycine. The strips are washed as before, then washed three more times with PBS pH 7. The strips are post-coated for 10 minutes at room temperature with 5% glucosamine in H O. The strips are lyophilized overnight then sealed with cellulose acetate and stored at 4°C in a foil pack containing a sachet of desiccant. Test samples are enriched by inoculating growth media with the sample. Growth media is preferably either Luria broth or Modified Davis Minimal Media. Growth conditions for Luria broth (10 g L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl) are 18 hours at 37°C for statistically. Growth conditions for Modified Davis Minimal Media (5.25 g L K 2 HPO 4 , 4.28 g L Na 2 HPO 4 , 2.25 g/L KH 2 PO 4 , 2.29 g/L NaH 2 PO 4 , 0.05 g L MgSo 4 , 1.0 g L (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 4 g/L protease peptone #3, 20 mM sodium citrate) are 37°C for 18 hours with vigorous shaking. The test samples are then decanted and concentrated. The test samples are first diluted in extraαion buffer then boiled for 15 minutes and finally cooled on ice. 50 μl of sample is added to a well of a prepared strip. 50 μl of prediluted rabbit anti-SEF17 HRP or anti-SEF18 HRP conjugate, in PBS pH 7/0.05% Tween 20/5% glycine is added to the well that contains the sample and gently shaken. Wells are incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes, then washed 7 times with PBS pH 7/0.05% Tween 20. lOOμl of tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) is added to the wells and color development is allowed to proceed for five minutes at room temperature. Color development is stopped with the addition of 25 μl of 1M H 3 PO 4 . Results can be read either visually or with a microplate reader at an absorbance of 405 nm. In a preferred embodiment, the anti-SEF17 HRP or anti-SEF18 HRP conjugate are combined in a cocktail, and are further preferably combined in a cocktail with anti-SEF14 HRP conjugate, anti-SEF21 HRP conjugate, and or anti-TctC HRP conjugate. Labels other than HRP can also be used according to the needs of the user. EXAMPLE 13 FimA-based diagnostic probes for Salmonella spp. Purification of SEF21 fimbriae SEF21 fimbriae were isolated from an LPS O-polysaccharide deficient, SEF17 fimbriae non-producing, TnphoA derivative of S. enteritidis 27655-3b, strain 3b- TτφhoA-7. Serial culturing was conducted to optimize SEF21 production through seleαion of cells growing in the surface pellicle. Subsequently, cells were grown statically to an optical density (ODgQOnm) of 10 by incubation for 90 h in 20 L of LB medium at 28°C; a temperature restrictive for the produαion of SEF 14 fimbriae. Approximately 95 to 100 g wet weight of cells were harvested by centrifugation (12,000 x g, 15 min, 4°C), washed with 1.2 L of 0.15 M ethanolamine buffer, pH 10.5, and resuspended in 1.2 L of ethanolamine buffer. Fimbriae were sheared from the cells using a Waring blender and unbroken cells and cell membranes were removed by centrifugation. Trace amounts of SEF 14 fimbriae were selectively precipitated by 18 h dialysis against two changes of 6 L of 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 0.2% SDS (BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), and harvested by centrifugation (15,000 x g, 15 min, 4°C). Residual SEF 14 fimbriae were similarly pelleted following concentration of the supernatant to 30 ml by dialysis against polyethylene glycol 20,000. SEF21 fimbriae present in the supernatant were colleαed by centrifugation (250,000 x g, 2h, 4°C) and resuspended in 2 ml of ethanolamine buffer. Final purification was achieved by rate zonal centrifugation (60,000 x g, 2.5 h, 4°C) in a sucrose gradient (15% (w/v) to 75% (w/v) sucrose in 0.15 M ethanolamine, pH 10.5, containing 0.5% deoxycholate). Peak fraαions were identified by SDS-PAGE, pooled and dialyzed against 8 L of distilled water. SEF21 fimbriae were resuspended in distilled water and passed through a Detoxi-Gel (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, EL) column to remove trace levels of LPS. Samples of SEF21 fimbriae were analyzed by SDS-PAGE to confirm the absence of other proteins or LPS deteαable by silver staining. The purity of the SEF21 fimbrial preparation was confirmed by Western blotting and immunoeleαron microscopy. Immunoassays To prepare antisera to S. enteritidis 27655-3b SEF21, purified SEF21 fimbriae, or membrane-bound FimA structural fimbrin protein prepared by Western blotting onto Trans-Blot® nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), were used to immunize New Zealand white rabbits. Polyclonal antisera to native SEF21 (titre>lθ8) was use d provided more sensitive detection of Salmonella Type 1 fimbriae and fimbrin protein than antisera to the SEF21 structural fimbrin protein, FimA (titre~lθ ). Antibodies that were weakly reaαive with C. freundii or C. amalanaticus were removed by repeated adsorption against cells of Citrobacter spp. without compromising immunodeteαion of Salmonella Type 1 and Type 2 fimbriae. Anti- SEF21 IgG was obtained by HPLC using a mono-Q column (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Anti-SEF21 antibodies were purified by affinity chromatography using SEF21 fimbriae coupled to AminoLink™ Gel (Pierce Chemical Company, Rockford, IL). Cross-reaαive, Salmonella Type 1 fimbrin proteins were deteαed by Western blotting as previously described. Type 1 or Type 2 fimbriae were deteαed on whole cells by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) performed by standard methods. Microtiter plates (Costar EIA/RIA places, Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA) were coated by incubation overnight at 37°C with washed cells suspended in PBS to an ODg20nm of 0.1. Goat, anti-rabbit, IgG-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Cedarlane Laboratories Ltd., Hornby, ON) served as the secondary antibody. The results of the assays are set forth in Table 4. TABLE 4 Other Enterobacteriaceae Citrobacter freundii 8090 UVIC Citrobacter amalanaticus GG 0 Citrobacter ~ diver sus GG 0 Enterobacter aerogenes UVIC 0 Erwinia caratovora UVIC 0 Escherichia coli H2 TJT 0 Hafrtia alvei UVIC 0 Klebsiella pneumoniae UVIC 0 Kluyvera cryocrescens GG 0 Proteus vulgaris UVIC 0 Providencia rettgeri UVIC 0 Serratia marcescens UVIC 0 Shigella sonnei UVIC 0 Other eubacteria Aeromonas hydrophila TJT __. _. __. _ _ o Aeromonas salmonicida WWK - 0 Bacillus subtilis UVIC 0 Pseudomonas aeruginosa UVIC - 0 α Abbreviations of sources: ATCC, American Type Culture Collection; BBF, B.B. Finlay, Biotechnology Laboratory and Departments of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; GG, G. Golumbeski, Promega Corporation, Madison, WI; JT, J. Tomas, Departement Microbiologie, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain; LCDC, H. Lior, National Enteric Reference Center of the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Ottawa, Canada; PVL, G. Thiele, Provincial Veterinary Laboratory of British Columbia, Abbotsford, Canada; TJT, T.J. Trust, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Canada; TW, T. Wadstrόm, University of Lund, Sweden; UVIC, Culture Collection of the Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Viαoria, Canada; WWK, W.W. Kay, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Canada; *The results of Western blotting detection of Type 1 fimbrin protein conducted according to Mϋller et al. using polyclonal antisera to native SEF21 fimbriae were qualitatively compared to FimA production by S. enteritidis strain 27655-3b grown in LB broth as follows: +++ equally high level production; ++, moderate production; +, low level production; -, no detectable fimbrin band. C ELISA detection of Type 1 fimbriae on whole cells was conducted by standard methods as described in Materials and Methods using polyclonal antisera to native SEF21 fimbriae. The results are presented as a percentage of the results obtained using cells of S. enteritidis 27655-3b obtained from LB broth cultures. "0" indicates an ELISA reaction equivalent to background readings. The values represent an average of three experiments, nd, not done. ^Abbreviations: LB, Luria-Bertani Broth; NB, Nutrient Broth; PW, Peptone-Water broth; CFA, Colonization Factor Antigen Broth; CFAP, solid CFA plate medium. EXAMPLE 14 AgfA-based diagnostic probes for Salmonella spp. Aggregative fimbriae from colonies grown on T medium for 5 days were solubilized and subjeαed to Western blot analysis as described by Collinson et al. (8). Anti-AgfA immune serum served as the primary antibody. Visualization of proteins that were immunologically cross-reaαive with AgfA was accomplished by using goat, anti-rabbit, immunoglobulin G-alkaline phosphatase conjugates (Caltag Laboratories, San Francisco, Calif), the substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate, and the enhancer Nitro Blue Tetrazolium (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). The results of the analysis, along with molecular weights (in thousands) of comigrating, prestained protein standards (Bethesda Research Laboratories) are shown in Figure 8. EXAMPLE 15 Subcloning and Sequencing of the fimA Gene To isolate the S enteritidis fimA gene, a genomic DNA library was prepared in a _βατπHI-digested, dephosphorlyated cosmid cloning veαor, pHC79 (Hohn and Collins, Gene 11: 291-198, 1980), using 35 to 40 kb fragments of strain 27655-3b chromosomal DNA generated by partial Sαw3AI digestion (Sambrook et al., supra). Concatameric DNA was packaged in baαeriophage λ using an in vitro Gigapack® II packaging extract (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and transfeαed into E. coli DH5α. Following chloramphenicol amplification (Sambrook et al., supra), approximately 600 colonies were screened by hybridization to a [γ- 3 2p]-end labeled, 44-mer oligonucleotide fimA probe, fAII (CAGCTTTACGGCGATTGGTAATACGACTGCGCAGGTGCC (SEQ. ID No. ) at 63°C (Doran et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 31: 2263-2273, 1993). A positively - hybridizing recombinant cosmid, pPB523 was purified and analyzed by Southern hybridization. A 4.4 kb EcόRl fragment encoding fimA was isolated by agarose gel eleαrophoresis and subcloned into pUC18 to create plasmid pJD12, which was maintained in E. coli DH5α. To determine the sequence of both strands of S enteritidis fimA, a series of overlapping subclones were prepared by shotgun subcloning or by cloning gel- purified (Sambrook et al., supra) HiriPl, HpaU, Sau3Al, or Taql fragments into M13mpl9 (Yannisch-Perron et al., supra) and propagating the recombinant baαeriophage in E. coli JM109. Appropriate recombinant plaques were identified by hybridization of the [γ- 32 P]-end labeled probe fAII to dot blots of recombinant M13mpl9. Enzymatic DNA sequencing reaαions were conduαed using the T7 DNA polymerase and Taq-Track® sequencing Systems (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) and by cycle sequencing conduαed for analysis using an ABI model 373 A automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Mississauga, ON). DNA sequencing polyacrylamide gels containing 40% formamide and sequencing reaαions utilizing 7-deaza-guanosine were used to resolve sequences that were fimA genes using the programs available on DNASIS (Hitachi Software Engineering Co., San Bruno, CA) and GeneWorks (Intelligenetics, Mountain View, CA). From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.

Claims: Claims 1. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a sefBCD gene cluster. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a sefU2Uj gene cluster. 3. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a sefUj gene. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a sefU2 gene. 5. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a sefB gene. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a sefC gene. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a sefD gene. 8. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising an agfA gene. 9. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a tctCBA gene cluster. 10. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a tctA gene. 11. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a tctB gene. 12. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a tctC gene. 13. The isolated nucleic acid molecule of any of claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12 wherein said isolated nucleic acid molecule is a recombinant molecule. 14. A probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figures 2A-2D, from nucleic acid number 755, to nucleic acid number 1495, said probe being capable of specifically hybridizing to Salmonella under conditions of high stringency. 15. A probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figures 2A-2D, from nucleic acid number 1512, to nucleic acid number 3956, said probe being capable of specifically hybridizing to Salmonella under conditions of high stringency. 16. A probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figures 2A-2D, from nucleic acid number 3953, to nucleic acid number 4402, said probe being capable of specifically hybridizing to Salmonella under conditions of high stringency. 17. A probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figures 3A-3B, from nucleic acid number 554, to nucleic acid number 1123, said probe being capable of specifically hybridizing to Salmonella under conditions of high stringency. 18. A probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figures 3A-3B, from nucleic acid number 449, to nucleic acid number 1027, said probe being capable of specifically hybridizing to Salmonella under conditions of high stringency. 19. A probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figures 4A-4B, from nucleic acid number 3323, to nucleic acid number 4420, said probe being capable of specifically hybridizing to Salmonella under conditions of high stringency. 20. A probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figure 5, from nucleic acid number 2727, to nucleic acid number 3236, said probe being capable of specifically hybridizing to Salmonella under conditions of high stringency. 21. A probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figures 6A-6B, from nucleic acid number 1393, to nucleic acid number 2270, said probe being capable of specifically hybridizing to Salmonella under conditions of high stringency. 22. A probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figure 7B, from nucleic acid number 1, to nucleic acid number 451, said probe being capable of specifically hybridizing to Salmonella under conditions of high stringency. 23. A veαor construα comprising a gene or gene cluster seleαed from the group consisting of a sefU2UjBCD gene cluster, a sefUj gene, sefU2 gene, a sefB gene, a sefC gene, a sefD gene, an agfA gene, a tctCBA gene cluster, a tctA gene, a tctB gene and a tctC gene. 24. The veαor construα of claim 23 wherein said veαor construα is an expression veαor. 25. The veαor construα of claim 23 wherein said veαor construα is an expression veαor able to express said gene or gene cluster upon introduction into a cell of a living plant or animal. 26. A probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figure 7B, from nucleic acid number 1, to nucleic acid number 451, said probe capable of specifically hybridizing to DNA of GWPQ-fimbriae encoding enteropathogenic baαeria of the family Enterobacteriaceae under conditions of moderate stringency. 27. A probe comprising at least a portion of the nucleotide sequence shown in Figures 2A-2D, from nucleic acid number 3953, to nucleic acid number 4402, said probe capable of specifically hybridizing to DNA of SEF18-fimbriae encoding enteropathogenic baαeria of the family Enterobacteriaceae under conditions of moderate stringency. 28. A probe capable of specifically hybridizing to a nucleic acid molecule from greater than 99% of Salmonella strains pathogenic to a warm-blooded animal, said probe capable of distinguishing said strains from other microbial organisms. 29. A primer suitable for a nucleic acid amplification procedure, said primer capable of specifically hybridizing to a nucleic acid molecule from greater than 99% of Salmonella strains pathogenic to a warm-blooded animal, said primer capable of distinguishing said strains from other microbial organisms. 30. A method for deteαing the presence of Salmonella in a sample, comprising: (a) treating cells contained within the sample to expose cellular nucleic acids; (b) incubating the cellular nucleic acids with a probe according to any one of claims 21 or 26; and (c) deteαing the presence of the hybridized probe. 31. A method for deteαing the presence of Salmonella in a sample, comprising: (a) treating cells contained within the sample to expose cellular nucleic acids; (b) amplifying a seleαed cellular nucleic acid sequence; (c) incubating the cellular nucleic acids with a probe according to any one of claims 21 or 26; and (d) deteαing the presence of the hybridized probe. 32. A method for deteαing the presence of an antibody to a protein seleαed from the group consisting of a SefD protein, SefC protein, and AgfA protein in a sample, comprising: (a) contaαing said sample with said protein bound to a solid phase under conditions suitable and for a time sufficient for antibodies in said sample to bind to said protem; and (b) deteαing bound antibodies, the presence of which indicates said protein. 33. A method for detecting the presence of Salmonella in a sample, comprising: (a) contaαing said sample with a labeled antibody to a SefC protein under conditions suitable for said antibody to bind to said SefC protein; and (b) deteαing the presence of a bound labeled antibody. 34. A method for distinguishing greater than 99% of strains of Salmonella that are pathogenic to warm-blooded animals from other microbes in less than 24 hours, comprising: (a) treating cells within a sample to expose cellular nucleic acids; (b) incubating the cellular nucleic acids with a probe according to any one of claims 21 or 26; and (c) deteαing the presence of the hybridized probe. 35. The method of claim 34 wherein said method is able to distinguish greater than 99.5% of said strains of Salmonella. 36. A method for distinguishing greater than 99% of strains of Salmonella that are pathogenic to warm-blooded animals from other microbes in less than 24 hours, comprising: (a) treating cells in a sample to expose cellular nucleic acids; (b) amplifying a seleαed cellular nucleic acid sequence using a primer according to claim 29; (c) incubating the amplified cellular nucleic acids with a probe; and (d) deteαing the presence of the hybridized probe. 37. The method of claim 36 wherein said method is able to distinguish greater than 99.5% of said strains of Salmonella. 38. A method for deteαing the presence of GWPQ fimbriae- encoding enteropathogenic baαeria of the family Enterobacteriaceae in a sample, comprising: (a) treating cells contained within the sample to expose cellular nucleic acids; (b) incubating the cellular nucleic acids with a labeled probe according to claim 26; and (c) deteαing the presence of the hybridized labeled probe. 39. A method for deteαing the presence of an antibody to Salmonella in a sample, comprising: (a) contaαing said sample with a group of proteins comprising an AgfA protein, a FimA protein, and a TctC protein, said proteins bound to a solid phase, said contaαing formed under conditions suitable and for a time sufficient for antibodies and said sample to bind two said proteins; and (b) detecting bound antibodies, the presence of which indicates the presence of the Salmonella. 40. A method for deteαing the presence of Salmonella in a sample, comprising: (a) contaαing said sample with a group of labeled antibodies to an AgfA protein, a FimA protein, and a TαC protein under conditions suitable for said antibody to bind to one or more of said proteins; and (b) deteαing the presence of a bound labeled antibody. 41. The method of any one of claims 39 or 40 wherein said method is able to distinguish greater than 99.9% of strains of the Salmonella. 42. An isolated protein seleαed from the group consisting of a SefB protein, a SefC protein, a SefD protein, an AgfA protein, a TαA protein, a TctB protein and a TαC protein. 43. A monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to said isolated protein of claim 42. 44. A hybridoma able to produce the antibody of claim 43.

Inventors: CLOUTHIER SHARON C, COLLINSON S KAREN, DORAN JAMES L, KAY WILLIAM W, CLOUTHIER, SHARON, C., COLLINSON, S., KAREN, DORAN, JAMES, L., KAY, WILLIAM, W.
Applicants: KING JOSHUA, UNIV VICTORIA INNOVAT DEV, KING, JOSHUA, UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMEN
Application year: 1994
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: A61K39, C07K14, C07K16, C12N15, C12P21, C12Q1