A high-velocity, high capacity mist eliminator and liquid-gas contacting means

Abstract: A method and apparatus for maximizing gas flow and liquid loading capacities of filamentary mist eliminators by means of appended drainage channels or gutters (6) which serve to augment collection of liquid drainage from the mist eliminator, protect the drainage liquid from re-entrainment by gas friction, and transport and discharge the drainage liquid to the low gas velocity region adjacent to the vessel walls (1).

Description: This invention relates to mist elimination, and in particular, mist elimination by means of filamentary pads or beds of extended surface or filamentary packing elements. This invention also relates to the use of filamentary mist eliminators as liquid-gas contacting means. Industrial filamentary mist eliminators are comprised of pads that are typically fabricated of layered knitted or woven metal or plastic filament mesh. Mist eliminators with filamentary structure may also be fabricated from non-woven fibrous media, such as porous air-laid mat bonded with resins. Mist eliminator beds of conventional tower packing elements, as well as beds of filamentary packing elements, such as those described in Lerner, U.S. Patent No. 3,410,057 and U.S. Patent No. 4,229,386, are also known to the art. Knitted-mesh types of mist eliminators are typically woven from four to 0.025cm (11-mil) filament diameters and have a capability of removing liquid droplets down to about 5 micrometers in droplet sizes. For finer drop removal, composite materials containing 10 to 50-micron diameter fiberglass or plastic fibers co-knitted with a heavier metal mesh framework are commonly used. Conventional knitted-mesh mist eliminator pads typically constitute uniform porous media, which tend to retain liquid due to surface tension and counterflow gas-liquid frictional effects. Even at very low mist loadings, a liquid layer tends to builds up in the mesh at the bottom of the pad. This is particularly the case for the smaller mesh pore openings (denser mesh and finer filaments). The liquid layer typically builds to a level which provides enough gravity head to allow equilibrium drainage discharge from the mesh at the same rate mist accumulates within the pad. Frictional effects that retard liquid drainage arise from the fact that the upflowing gas is forced to rise through the same mesh pore channels that the captured liquid mist must use to back drain out of the pad. This competitive flow situation impedes liquid drainage. Typically, pad thickness for effective mist removal is determined not by the requirement for filtering out the initial mist reaching the pad, but for filtering out the secondary mist generated in the pad by gas bubbling through the retained layer of liquid. This secondary mist is typically designated as re-entrainment. The limit on gas flow capacity of a mist eliminator is generally set by either the flood point or re-entrainment penetration point. For the purpose of this specification, the flood point is defined as that combination of gas and liquid rates at which liquid begins to rapidly accumulate within the pad with a correspondingly rapid rise in gas pressure drop across the mist eliminator. For the purpose of this specification, the re-entrainment penetration point is defined as that point at which spray generated by gas bubbling through the continuous liquid layer within the mist eliminator pad penetrates the upper surface of the pad. Prior art for increasing the flood point and gas flow capacity of a mist eliminator pad or bed provides preferential liquid discharge paths from the pad. Typical of this art is Lerner, U.S. Pat. No. 4,022,593, and Ozolins, et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,744,806. Ozolins, et al., '806, as well as Lerner, '593, '057 and '386, teach the provision of preferential discharge paths to drain the liquid from the filamentary bed or pad to avoid flow interference with gas flow paths in the pad. Ozolins, et al., uses internally structured mesh pads in which there are zones of varied mesh density, while Lerner '593 provides external filamentary drainage rolls acting as appended liquid downspouts. Both means of facilitating liquid discharge from the lower portion of the mist eliminator pad or bed serve to decrease liquid retention in the pad and increase the gas re-entrainment velocity. These prior art mist eliminators thus typically operate at higher gas velocities than do conventional plain pad mist eliminators. However, in both Ozolins '806 and Lerner '593, liquid is discharged in the form of drops or streams directly into the approach gas flow, which is now at higher velocities than can be employed with a conventional pad. It has now been discovered that the higher ranges of gas velocities achievable using the art of Ozolins '806 or Lerner '593 are high enough to entrain free-falling liquid drops. Additionally, the turbulent flow regime corresponding to the higher gas flow rates generates a maximum gas flow velocity in the central region of the containing vessel. Thus, while facilitated discharge of liquid from the pad serves to increase the gas velocity operating range, the increase in gas rate impedes the free fall of the liquid external to the pad, particularly in the central region of the vessel. Secondary failure of the pads of '593 and '806 has been found to occur by entrainment of the liquid discharge drops and stream external to the mist eliminator by the higher gas velocity approaching the pad. The new limiting flood parameter of pad or bed operation results from refluxing of the liquid back to the pad after it has been discharged from the pad or its appendages. Because the refluxing of liquid drops occurs outside of the pad, this secondary cause of pad flooding is a function of the approach gas velocity, not the internal pore gas velocity. The prior art of augmenting internal liquid drainage in and from the pad, thereby increasing internal pad gas flood velocities, has thus created a new and undesirable secondary cause of flow limitation. That is, solutions to the problem of facilitating pad liquid release have led to an external problem of re-entrainment of the liquid discharge by the higher allowable gas velocities. A means of augmenting pad liquid drainage, without incurring the creation of the secondary flood mechanism limit external to the pad, is needed to achieve higher pad flow capacities and extend the operating range of filamentary mesh pads and beds. This invention seeks to provide a method and apparatus for maximizing gas flow and liquid loading capacities of filamentary mist eliminators without creating secondary liquid reflux problems external to the mist eliminator. Further, this invention seeks to provide a mist eliminator having increased gas flow capacity at high liquid loads and methods of fabricating same. It is still a further object of this invention to provide a mist eliminator which can be used as a mass transfer device by irrigation of its extended filamentary surfaces at high liquid and gas rates. According to the present invention there is provided a mist eliminator assembly for liquid mist removal from gas plus mist streams, comprising: a filamentary pad or bed disposed in a vessel through which said gas plus mist stream flows substantially in a first direction opposing gravity, characterised in that at least one liquid drainage member is placed substantially perpendicular to the gas plus mist stream flow direction adjacent to the pad or bed such that said drainage member captures liquid draining from said pad or bed, said drainage member transporting and discharging said liquid away from said pad or bed. The present invention also provides a method for removal of mist from a gas plus mist stream comprising the steps of: introducing a gas plus mist stream flow into a vessel; passing the gas plus mist stream flow through a filamentary pad to substantially remove the mist from the gas plus mist stream flow; collecting the mist which has been removed from the gas plus mist stream flow in at least one drainage member under the filamentary pad as the mist removed from the gas plus mist stream flow by the filamentary pad drips therefrom; transporting the collected mist in the drainage member to a discharge station located in a low, or non-existent, gas velocity domain. It has now been discovered that gas-quiescent liquid drainage areas at the upstream surfaces of the mist eliminator pads can be created by means of one or more planar drainage troughs placed on, or in close proximity to, the bottom pad surface or its support structure. The flow "shadows" formed in the filamentary pads by such drainage troughs or gutters create unimpeded liquid drainage areas in the pad which are totally shielded from gas friction. Most surprisingly, the drainage troughs serve to increase the limiting gas flow velocities of the mist eliminator despite the blockage of gas flow area by the drainage troughs. Preferably, the appended drainage gutters or channels are so installed as to transport the drainage liquor to, and discharge the liquid into, the low gas flow velocity regions adjacent to the vessel walls. In the novel liquid discharge arrangement of this invention, the liquid draining from the troughs or gutters is discharged into the lowest gas velocity region adjacent to the vessel wall and the pad-external re-entrainment of the discharged liquid streams by high gas rates is avoided. It would be reasonably expected that the blockage of mist eliminator surface area by the drainage troughs of this invention would cause an increase in point gas velocity in the unblocked bottom areas of the mist eliminator. This higher point gas velocity should logically result in local flooding failure of the pad at lower superficial gas velocities (i.e., velocity based on the total pad surface) than the unblocked pad. However, the opposite has been found to be true. It has been discovered that liquid in the bottom of the pad is sucked into the troughs or the "shadow" zones immediately above the troughs by a Von Karman roll-vortex action and/or vacuum generated behind the troughs by the gas flow around the trough. Thus, even though the point velocity may be raised above the normal unblocked pad gas velocity flood or re-entrainment point, the roll-vortex action downstream of the trough yields significantly higher rates of collection and discharge of liquid from the pad, and greatly reduces the liquid holdup in the pad. This effect appears to more than counterbalance the gas velocity increase in the unblocked pad area, and yields a higher net flood and re-entrainment gas velocity than the pad alone. In the practice of this invention, the drainage troughs may be affixed to the bottom face of the mist eliminator pad or bed, or to the grid or structure supporting the mist eliminator. In the latter case, it has been determined that the spaced-apart location has little or no effect on the beneficial effect obtained by the use of the drainage troughs. The drainage troughs may be V-shaped, rectangular in cross-section, or cylindrical section in shape. To facilitate drainage and to conduct drainage liquid to the low gas velocity region at the vessel walls, troughs having a concave upwards cross-section are preferred. The tolerance for high liquid loads achieved by facilitated pad drainage and discharge of the liquid drainage streams to the low gas velocity region adjacent to the vessel walls allows continuous face-spray irrigation of the extended pad filamentary surface area for mass transfer purposes at higher gas rates than have previously been available. A preferred embodiment of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the drawings, in which:- Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic sectional view of a vessel containing an embodiment of the invention, with parts broken away to show details of the apparatus of the invention, showing placement of multiple drainage troughs at the upstream surface of a mist eliminator pad. Fig. 2 is an enlarged orthogonal view of the apparatus of the invention shown in Figure 1, illustrating the discharge of the liquid from the drainage troughs into gas-quiescent flow areas. Also shown in Fig. 2 is a schematic representation of the velocity profile of gas in fully-developed turbulent flow. With reference to Fig. 1, a cylindrical vessel 1 having walls 2 encloses and supports a filamentary mist eliminator pad 3 having a diameter equal to that of the vessel 1. Vessel 1 contains a lower inlet 4 through which a mist-containing gas 5 flows into the vessel 1. Suspended below the mist eliminator pad 3 are drainage troughs 6. The mist eliminator pad 3 removes the liquid mist from the gas 5. The liquid collects at the bottom of the filamentary mist eliminator body and drains into the drainage troughs 6. Drainage takes place under the influence of gravity, and in the gas "shadow" zones downstream of the drainage troughs, liquid drainage is substantially unimpeded by the countervailing force of direct gas friction. Collected liquid 10 is discharged from the drainage troughs 6 to the area close to the walls 2 of the vessel 1 and flows down to the bottom of the vessel and out the bottom drain 7. The de-misted gas 8 exits through the nozzle 9 at the top of the vessel. With reference to Figure 2, which is an enlarged orthogonal view of the apparatus of Figure 1, collected liquid 10 draining from the drainage troughs 6 is discharged in the vicinity of the walls 2 of vessel 1. In the gas flow velocity range where mist collection by impingement on filaments is operative, gas flow is in the turbulent range of flow. A schematic representation of a typical gas velocity profile 11 of a gas in turbulent flow in a cylindrical vessel is depicted. The velocity profile 11 indicates the point velocities 12 of a gas in turbulent flow relative to the diameter of the containing vessel. In the cylindrical vessel 1, fully-developed turbulent flow corresponds to a velocity profile 11 where the gas velocity 12 in the central area of the vessel is maximum, and the gas velocity 13 in the boundary layer at the vessel walls 2 is minimum, approaching zero at the wall. This area proximate the wall is therefore a relatively quiescent gas flow region. Discharge of the liquid 10 into the zones next to the vessel walls 2 presents the liquid with minimum upflow gas velocities and gas frictional forces that cause liquid re-entrainment and refluxing. EXAMPLE I A series of trials was conducted in a 29 cm (11.5-inch) i.d. clear acrylic column through which air was blown upward through a woven mesh mist eliminator. The test mesh mist eliminator was 10 cm (4 inches) thick, comprised of 23 crimped double layers of 0.025 cm (11-mil) stainless steel woven mesh, held in top and bottom 1-inch deep frames. The test pad was measured by weighing as having a volumetric density of 128 kg/m 3 (8 pounds per cubic foot.) Air was supplied to the acrylic test column by means of a forced draft centrifugal fan, and air velocity was measured by means of a pitot tube located in a 15.2 cm (6-inch) diameter duct above the test column section. To simulate very high mist loadings, water spray was directed at the mist eliminator at metered liquid rates, cocurrent with air flow. Two separate sets of liquid mist loading rate runs were made, using two different spray nozzles. The first series of test runs were made using a Steinen SSM61 nozzle operated at 2.7 bar (40 psig) at a capacity of 2.27 ℓ/min (0.6 GPM.) The first series of runs, referred to hereinafter as the Steinen series, was conducted at a spray rate of 2.27 ℓ/min (0.6 GPM). At 2.27 ℓ/min (0.6 GPM), the mass mist liquid loading on the pad was 2100 kg/h/m 2 (417 pounds per hour per square foot) of mesh. The Steinen spray nozzle was located 21.6 cm (8-1/2 inches) below the mist eliminator pad, so that for the spray angle, the spray coverage was limited to the pad area. Liquid spray rates were metered by means of a rotameter, and were maintained constant at 2.27 ℓ/min (0.6 GPM) during a run. A run was conducted by increasing the air flow in a stepwise manner, measuring pressure drop and air velocity at each step, and visually observing the top of the mist eliminator and the area above it by means of a floodlight positioned alongside the acrylic column. Pressure drop across the mist eliminator pad was measured by means of an inclined manometer. The re-entrainment, or visual flood point, was taken as the point at which liquid drops were visually observed penetrating the top surface of the mist eliminator pad. An initial reference test run in the Steinen series was made with the pad alone, increasing gas flow stepwise under constant-rate spray irrigation. Liquid re-entrainment was first observed above the pad at 235 m/min (773 feet) per minute) (fpm)) and become massive at 240 m/min (790 fpm), with a rapid pressure drop increase. In the next test of the Steinen series, a half-tube section of a 8.9 cm (3-1/2 inch) diameter pipe, 28.6 cm (11-1/4 inch) long, was affixed to the center of the bottom frame, facing concave upward, spaced 1 inch below the bottom of the mesh. The projected blocked-out mist pad flow area was 37.9% of the total area of the pad. A repeat of the stepwise air increase run gave a re-entrainment velocity range of 285 m/min (934 fpm). This represents a 49 m/min (161 fpm) (20.8%) increase in re-entrainment gas velocity, using the drainage trough of this invention. During this run, it was visually observed that the liquid in the bottom of the mesh pad was being sucked into the drainage trough. Close examination revealed that the air flow around the drainage trough, as evidenced by the liquid flow patterns, was in apparent roll or vortex flow in the mesh behind the trough. The air flow pattern caused the liquid to be lifted in the mesh areas around the trough "shadow" and swirled into the shadow area. This unique action resulted in markedly enhanced liquid removal from the bottom of the mesh. This action is one, if not the primary, cause of the increase in pad re-entrainment velocity. Significantly, with almost 38% of the pad area blocked by the drainage trough, the gas velocity in the remaining unblocked area was 38% higher in the drainage trough run than the gas velocity through the pad in the reference run. This difference is reflected in the pad pressure drop at the initial re-entrainment point. For the reference pad run, this was 5.7 cm (2.25 inches) of water column (W.C.), while for the pad plus drainage trough run, the corresponding pressure drop was 7.6 cm (3.00 inches) W.C.. The 38% increase in gas velocity in the unblocked pad area would normally be expected to radically lower the re-entrainment point. In view of this, the effectiveness of the trough action in increasing the re-entrainment point by more than 20% is even more remarkable. Despite the substantial blockage and restriction of gas flow area, which would tend to raise localized gas velocities through the unblocked liquid-retaining areas of the pad, the re-entrainment flood range capacity of the mist eliminator was found to be increased significantly. It was noted in the cylindrical drainage trough run that the liquid discharged from the trough near the walls of the column flowed off the trough in virtually-undisturbed streams, falling in a short arc into contact with the walls. The liquid then spread out on the walls of the column and flowed without disturbance from gas flow to the drain. In a third Steinen run, a 5 cm x 5 cm (2 x 2 inch) angle, 28.6 cm (11-1/4 inch) long, was substituted for the semi-circular drainage trough. This angle was affixed to the center of the bottom mist eliminator frame, with the apex down, forming an upwardly open drainage gutter. The visual re-entrainment point for this drainage member was found to be 287 m/min (944 fpm), slightly better than that obtained with the semi-circular drainage trough. In order to compare the effect of the drainage troughs of this invention with the prior art, the mesh pad of the Steinen series was equipped with a drainage member according to the teachings of Lerner, '593. A 7.6 cm (3-inch) diameter, 27.9 cm (11-inch) long, drainage roll of 11-mesh of the same construction as the mesh pad was made and fastened to the bottom mesh of the pad. This type of mist eliminator construction is marketed commercially under the trade-mark of "Mist-Master R ". A fourth test run in the Steinen series with this pad/roll combination gave a visual re-entrainment point of 275 m/min (904 fpm), somewhat below the 284 and 287 m/min (934 and 944 fpm) values obtained in the previous Steinen runs with the drainage troughs of this invention. Thus, despite area blockage, the drainage troughs of this invention yield higher mesh eliminator re-entrainment velocities than liquid drainage arrays of the prior art. The summary of these tests is presented in Table I. In a second series of test runs, designated as the Bete series, spray was generated by means of a Bete Fog Nozzle Company TF8FCN nozzle, operated at 2.7 bar (40 psig) at rate of 9.8 ℓ/min (2.6 GPM), placed 15.2 cm (6 inches) below the bottom of the pad. The results of the Bete series of runs are listed in Table I, along with the results of the Steinen series. Although the drainage troughs of this invention were found to give an improvement over the reference pad run, the differences for the Bete series were not as marked as those of the Steinen series. It was observed during the Bete runs that the drainage trough was almost filled with liquid, and it was suspected that the drainage capacity of the troughs was limiting the discharge rate from the pad. Accordingly, Test 8 was run with a 5 cm x 5 cm (2-inch x 2-inch) angle drainage trough, but with a 4.9 ℓ/min (1.3 GPM) spray rate. The re-entrainment gas velocity at this liquid load was found to be 258 m/min (846 fpm), as compared to the 206 m/min (678 fpm) limit at 9.8 ℓ/min (2.6 GPM). This verified the visual finding that the drainage capacity of the single gutter was the limiting value at the higher liquid loading. This gutter transport rate limitation may be overcome by providing multiple drainage troughs or large troughs. Relative to a conventional knitted-mesh mist eliminator having a density of 144 kg/m 3 (9 pounds per cubic foot), and operating under a water spray load of 2100 kg/h/m 2 (417 pounds/hour/square foot) of surface, the use of the drainage gutters of this invention increased the re-entrainment air velocity from about 237 m/min to 284-287 m/min (780 fpm to 933-944 fpm). Relative to a pad equipped with a mesh drainage roll of the prior art, the gutters of this invention increased the air re-entrainment velocity from 275 m/min to 284-287 m/min (904 to 933-944 fpm) at the 2100 kg/h/m 2 (417 pounds/hour/square foot) water spray load. These are significant increases in limiting air flow rates over those of a conventional pad and prior art devices. However, it is recognized that these range increase values are typical of the air-water system used in the trials, and the extent of the increase in operating ranges gained by the use of the drainage members of this invention will be different for liquids having physical properties differing from water, and for gases having densities other than that of ambient air. Although the drainage members used in the trials were solid, impermeable troughs, it is within the scope of this invention to utilize permeable or semi-permeable materials for drainage troughs, providing that a major part of the liquid draining from the filamentary or mesh pad or bed is conveyed by the troughs to gas-quiescent or low gas velocity zones. It is known in the art that pads or beds of filamentary construction may be employed as gas-liquid contact means for mass transfer. The facilitated pad drainage and tolerance for high liquid loads of this invention allows continuous face-spray irrigation of the extended pad filamentary surface area for mass transfer purposes at higher rates than have previously been allowable. RE-ENTRAINMENT GAS VELOCITIES m/min (FEET PER MINUTE) 29 cm (11.5-INCH) DIAMETER MIST ELIMINATOR 10 cm (4-INCH) THICK KNITTED MESH ARRANGEMENT RUN No. STEINEN SERIES 2.3 ℓ/min (0.6 GPM) RUN. No. BETE SERIES 98 ℓ/min (2.6 GPM) Pad Only 1 236 (773) 5 191 (628) Pad + 8.9 cm (3-1/2") Diameter Half-tube Drain 2 284 (934) 6 204 (671) Pad + 5 cm x 5cm (2" x 2") Angle Drain Trough 3 288 (944) 7 207 (678) Pad + 7.6 cm (3") Diameter Mesh Drain Roll 4 275 (904) BETE SERIES 4.9 ℓ/min (1.3 GPM) Pad + 5 cm x 5 cm (2" x 2") Angle Drain Trough 8 258 (846)

Claims: A mist eliminator assembly for liquid mist removal from gas plus mist streams, comprising: a filamentary pad or bed (3) disposed in a vessel (1) through which said gas plus mist stream flows substantially in a first direction opposing gravity, characterised in that at least one liquid drainage member (6) is placed substantially perpendicular to the gas plus mist stream flow direction adjacent to the pad or bed (3) such that said drainage member (6) captures liquid draining from said pad or bed (3), said drainage member (6) transporting and discharging said liquid away from said pad or bed (3). The apparatus of Claim 1 in which the said drainage member or members (6) is/are of upwardly open arcuate cross-section. The apparatus of Claim 1 in which the drainage member or members (6) is/are of angular cross-section, open upward. The apparatus of Claim 1 in which the drainage member or members (6) is/are of rectangular cross-section, open upward. An apparatus as claimed in any one of Claims 1 to 4, in which said vessel (1) has walls (2) and said drainage member (6) transporting and discharging said liquid proximate to the walls (1) of said vessel, whereby the discharge of liquid from said assembly is into a gas-quiescent flow region. An apparatus as claimed in any one of Claims 1 to 5, wherein said drainage member (6) is impermeable. A method for removal of mist from a gas plus mist stream comprising the steps of: introducing a gas plus mist stream flow into a vessel (1); passing the gas plus mist stream flow through a filamentary pad (3) to substantially remove the mist from the gas plus mist stream flow; collecting the mist which has been removed from the gas plus mist stream flow in at least one drainage member (6) under the filamentary pad (3) as the mist removed from the gas plus mist stream flow by the filamentary pad (3) drips therefrom; transporting the collected mist in the drainage member (6) to a discharge station located in a low, or non-existent, gas velocity domain.

Inventors: LERNER BERNARD J, LERNER, BERNARD J.
Applicants: BECO ENG CO, BECO ENGINEERING COMPANY
Application year: 1994
Main classification: B01J19
IPC codes: B01D45, B01D46