Coatable composition and methods of making abrasive articles

Abstract: Coatable compositions suitable for use in producing abrasive articles are presented. The inventive coatable compositions characterized by a combination of a free radically polymerizable composition, abrasive particles, and a photoinitiator system. The photoinitiator system characterized by a compound which cleaves via α-cleavage and has a molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution ranging from about 4 to about 400 liter/mole-cm in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 and about 500 nanometers. Abrasive articles incorporating cured versions of the compositions are presented, as well as methods of making and using the articles.

Description: This invention relates to coatable compositions useful in making abrasive articles. More specifically, this invention relates to coatable compositions which include free radically curable compositions, particularly those including colored abrasive particles and/or colorants. Three common abrasive articles are coated abrasives, bonded abrasives, and nonwoven abrasives. A coated abrasive comprises a backing onto which abrasive particles are adhered with a binder, typically a thermoset binder cured in a large festoon oven. The backing may, for example, be selected from paper, cloth, film, vulcanized fiber, and the like, or a combination of one or more of these materials or treated versions thereof. The abrasive particles are typically chosen from flint, garnet, aluminum oxide, alumina zirconia, ceramic aluminum oxide, diamond, silicon carbide (either green or black), cubic boron nitride, and the like. In bonded abrasives, a slurry is prepared comprising a resin and abrasive particles. The slurry is placed in a mold, the resin is cured, typically using heat and pressure, holding the abrasive particles together to form a three-dimensional object. Examples of bonded abrasives include grinding wheels, honing sticks, dresser sticks and sharpening sticks. Nonwoven abrasives comprise an open, lofty, three dimensional web of fibers bound together at points where they contact by a binder, which may or may not include abrasive particles. The above-mentioned abrasive articles may be produced using addition polymerizable compositions as binder precursors, wherein polymerization may be initiated in a variety of ways, including, for example, thermal decomposition of peroxides, radiation (particle or non-particle), or a combination of the two. The chain carrier in the propagation step may be either ionic or contain a free radical. Addition polymerizable compositions, particularly free radically polymerizable compositions, are useful in producing abrasive articles. The free radically polymerizable compositions significantly reduce or completely eliminate the need for large festoon thermal curing ovens in the production of coated abrasives. However, the abrasive performance of these articles depends greatly on the curing conditions, such as the wavelength of non-particle radiation, the type and structure of the article being produced, the chemistry of the photoinitiation system used, the color of the abrasive particles, and the like. For example, there is a wide variety of abrasive particle colors, such that those abrasive particles most suitable for radiation curing may not afford the most efficacious abrasive articles in terms of cut. On the other hand, those abrasive particles having a dark color (such as brown heat-treated aluminum oxide) may not allow radiation to be transmitted to produce the depth of cure necessary to yield efficacious abrasive articles. Further, if the abrasive articles are produced using a web process, i.e., in large sheet-like structures (often referred to as "webs") which are wound onto a roll, the degree of cure also depends on the exposure time and depth of the coating to be cured. There is thus a need in the abrasives art for coatable compositions (i.e., compositions having viscosity which allow coating via conventional means, such as knife coaters) which comprise abrasive particles (particularly colored abrasive particles), free radically polymerizable compositions, and photoinitiator systems, which produce efficient abrasive articles at high productions rates. Caul et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,588,419, disclose coated abrasives made from a combination of acrylated epoxy resins and heat curable resins. The resins may include calcium carbonate filler and a suspending agent, the preferred suspending agent apparently being fumed silica. Pieper et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,917, disclose the production of structured abrasives using techniques which are useful in the present invention. Pieper et al. and Caul et al., however, do not disclose use of the photoinitiator systems which are useful in the present invention, or how their use may afford a more efficient abrasive article or higher production rates. In accordance with the present invention, novel coatable compositions including a photoinitiator system are presented. Surprisingly, it has been found that the addition of a photoinitiator system, which includes a compound having molar absorptivity within the herein-mentioned range, to conventional free radical polymerizable compositions, allows for faster cure of the coatable compositions (allowing faster web speeds and better depth of cure of the coatable composition). Further, the abrasive products exhibit improved performance over articles made using previously known photoinitiators, as exemplified in the Examples herein below. Thus, one aspect of the invention is a coatable composition suitatile for use in producing abrasive articles, the coatable composition comprising abrasive particles and a photoinitiator system dispersed in a free radically polymerizable composition, wherein said photoinitiator system includes a compound which cleaves via α-cleavage, said compound having a molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution ranging from about 4 to about 400 liter/mole-cm in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers with the proviso that said compound is not 2-benzyl-2-N,N-dimethylamino-1-(4-morpholinophenyl)-1-butanone. As used herein the term "about 4 liter/mole-cm", when discussing molar absorptivity, means 4±1; the term "about 395 nanometers", when discussing the UV/visible spectrum, means 395±5 nanometers. As used herein the term "molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution" means the absorptivity in an approximately 1.0 to 10 millimolar solution of methanol at ambient temperature (about 20°C). The photoinitiator systems useful in the invention may also comprise (in addition to α-cleavage compounds having molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution ranging from about 4 to about 400 liter/mole-cm in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers) a photoinitiator selected from the group consisting of: a) non-α-cleavage photoinitiators; b) bimolecular photoinitiators; c) unimolecular α-cleavage photoinitiators having a molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution less than about 4 liter/mole-cm; and d) unimolecular α-cleavage photoinitiators having a molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution greater than about 400 liter/mole-cm. As used herein the term "coatable composition" when used to described the inventive compositions means a composition comprising abrasive particles and a photoinitiator system dispersed in a free radically polymerizable composition. The term is meant to include compositions which may be coated by conventional coating equipment, such as knife coaters. The term is also meant to include compositions which may be made coatable, such as with the application of heat and/or shear forces. "Free radically polymerizable composition" includes monomeric and oligomeric compounds and resins in which polymerization is initiated and propagated by free radicals, and the terms "polymerizable" and "polymerized" resin are meant to include resins produced by both chain growth and crosslinking reactions. These compounds or resins include those having at least one ethylenically unsaturated group. The terms "dispersion" and "dispersed" do not necessarily connote a uniform or homogenous dispersion, but uniform dispersions of both the abrasive particles and photoinitiator system in the free radically polymerizable composition are preferred. As used herein the term "photoinitiator system" is meant to exclude those materials which would have a substantially deleterious effect on (or completely terminate) free radical polymerization. The term "photoinitiator system" also excludes ion-generating compounds, however the term "coatable composition" does not exclude ion-generating compounds, and does not exclude those thermally curable resins, fillers, diluents, and the like, which are compatible with the critical ingredients of the coatable compositions of the invention. In the specific context of this invention, this means that the inventive coatable compositions preferably contain less than 5 weight percent water, more preferably less than 1 weight percent, and most preferably no water. The term "binder" means a cured composition, whereas "binder precursor" means an uncured composition. A "cured product" means a product containing binder. In the context of the present invention the phrase "suitable for use in producing abrasive articles" means that, in the case of coated, bonded, and nonwoven abrasives, the coatable compositions of the invention have rheological properties allowing them to be coated, sprayed, spread or poured onto a backing or into a mold without having to continuously agitate the composition. One preferred free radically polymerizable composition for use in the invention is that including an acrylated isocyanurate monomer and/or oligomer. As used herein the term "resin" includes monomers and oligomers. An abrasive article may be made using the coatable composition of the present invention, the article comprising a plurality of abrasive particles adhered together (and optionally to a backing) by a binder derived from a free radically polymerizable composition which includes a photoinitiator system, the photoinitiator system comprising a compound having the molar absorptivity previously enumerated. Another aspect of the invention is that the abrasive particles included in the coatable composition of the invention can be darkened in pigment; i.e., they can be nonwhite in color and be nontransparent. A coated abrasive of the type comprises a backing having an abrasive coating thereon, and the abrasive coating may be derived from the inventive coatable composition. As used herein the term "coated" abrasive means an article comprising an abrasive coating adhered to a backing. Preferred abrasive coatings include aluminum oxide abrasive particles, wherein the photoinitiator system comprises from about 0.1 to about 10 weight percent of the abrasive composition, the abrasive particles comprise from about 50 to about 85 weight percent, and the addition polymerizable resin comprises from about 10 to about 45 weight percent, all weight percentages based on total dry weight of said coatable composition. Another aspect of the invention is a method of making a coated abrasive comprising the steps of: (a) coating a backing material with the inventive coatable composition; and (b) exposing the coated backing of step (a) to at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers sufficient to cure the free radically polymerizable resin in the coatable composition. Yet another aspect of the invention is a method of making an abrasive article comprising the steps of: 1) coating a coatable composition of the invention onto a production tool having a three dimensional pattern; 2) contacting major surface of a backing having two major surfaces with the coatable composition so that the coatable composition wets at least one major surface of the backing, thus forming a first intermediate article; 3) exposing the coatable composition to a radiation source which emits radiation in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers sufficient to at least partially cure the free radically polymerizable resin in the coatable composition to form a second intermediate article; and 4) removing the second intermediate article from the production tool, yielding an abrasive article. Another aspect of the invention is a coated abrasive comprising: (a) a backing having a front surface and a back surface; (b) a make coating present on the front surface of the backing; (c) a plurality of abrasive particles adhered to the backing by the make coating; and (d) a size coating present over the abrasive particles, wherein at least one of the make and size coatings is the cured product of a coatable composition comprising an addition polymerizable resin and a photoinitiator system as above described. Nonwoven abrasive articles comprise an open, lofty, three-dimensional network of fibers bound together at points where they contact with a binder, the binder derived from the coatable composition of the invention. Other advantages and aspects of the invention will be described in the description of preferred embodiments which follows. Fig. 1 is a section view, enlarged, of an abrasive article embodiment of this invention; Fig. 2 is a section view, enlarged, representing another abrasive article embodiment of this invention; Fig. 3 is a schematic of a process of making the abrasive article of Fig. 2; and Fig. 4 is a schematic of another process of making the abrasive article of Fig. 2. This invention pertains to coatable compositions, and to methods of making and using abrasive articles, the articles having performance properties equal to or improved over previously known abrasive articles. In coated abrasives, the term "binder" may refer to any of the coatings. In nonwoven abrasives a binder bonds abrasive particles onto the fibers of a porous, lofty, fibrous web, and the same or a different binder adheres the fibers to themselves at points where they contact. Photoinitiator Systems Photoinitiator systems useful in the invention are combined with conventional (i.e., previously known) binder precursors which contain a free radically polymerizable resin and abrasive particles, and optionally previously known photoinitiator systems. Photoinitiator systems useful in the compositions of the invention are required to comprise a compound which 1) cleaves via α-cleavage, and 2) has a molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution ranging from about 4 to about 400 liter/mole-cm in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers. The molar absorptivity of a photoinitiator may vary with concentration and type of solvent medium. For the purposes of the present invention, the UV/visible spectral data of photoinitiators having the required molar absorptivity, as well as examples of photoinitiators having molar absorptivity outside of this range but which may comprise a minor portion of a photoinitiator system useful in the invention, are displayed in Tables I to VIII of the Examples section. These tables show the molar absorptivity of various photoinitiators at wavelengths ranging from 370 to 500 nanometers. Since differences in molar absorptivities of photoinitiators at any given wavelength can be observed simply by measuring the spectra in different solvents, a single solvent, methanol, was used in measuring the spectra for all photoinitiators. Also, since one goal was to accurately measure molar absorptivities in the range of 0 to 400 liter/mole-cm, the concentrations of the solutions were about 1.0 - 10 millimolar to minimize measurement error. For the purpose of the present invention, the term "dilute methanol solution" means a methanol solution of a photoinitiator system in the above specified concentration range. (To gather information on the absorption maxima of the photoinitiators at which the molar absorptivity could easily be 10,000 to 50,000, even less concentrated solutions of methanol would be appropriate.) The terms "photoinitiator", "α-cleavage photoinitiator", "sensitizer", "bimolecular photoinitiator system", "aromatic ketone/coinitiator system", as well as the names of the various initiator compounds and systems mentioned herein are defined in "Chemistry and Technology of UV and EB Formulation for Coatings, Inks, and Paints", Vol. III, pages 115-324, K. Dietliker, published by SITA Technology Ltd. (1991). A photoinitiator is simply a chemical capable of generating a free radical upon exposure to radiation. The term "α-cleavage photoinitiation" actually refers to the reaction which produces the free radical. Usually α-cleavage photoinitiators undergo a homolytic cleavage (upon irradiation) at a location between a carbonyl group and a carbon, phosphorous, or sulfur atom positioned "α" to the carbonyl group. A "bimolecular photoinitiator system" is a photoinitiator system comprising a compound containing a carbonyl group which reacts with a hydrogen donor (termed herein "coinitiator") to give a product in which the carbonyl group is reduced to an alcohol. An "aromatic ketone/coinitiator system" is one type of bimolecular photoinitiator system wherein the compound containing a carbonyl group is an aromatic ketone. One example of this system is benzophenone derivative/amine systems, which are particularly useful in curing coatable compositions of the invention in the presence of air. Other useful bimolecular photoinitiator systems include 1,2-diketone/coinitiator systems (such as camphorquinone/4-N,N-dimethylaminoethyl benzoate), and ketocoumarine/coinitiator systems. The species which absorbs radiation in the case of bimolecular photoinitiator systems is sometimes termed a sensitizer in this context. However, the word "sensitizer" as used herein refers only to compounds which transfer energy from their excited states to other molecules without undergoing a chemical reaction. Sensitizers generally absorb light at a longer wavelength than the photoinitiator compound, and transfer their energy to the photoinitiator. Sensitizers should be capable of light absorption somewhere within the range of wavelengths between about 300 and about 1000 nanometers, more preferably between about 400 and 700 nanometers, and most preferably from about 395 to about 500 nanometers. Examples of preferred sensitizers are thioxanthone derivatives. The sensitizer typically and preferably comprises no more than about 50 weight percent of the photoinitiator system. Preferably, coatable compositions in accordance with the invention are those wherein the photoinitiator system consists essentially of an α-amino acetophenone with the proviso that said compound is not 2-benzyl-2-N,N-dimethylamino-1-(4-morpholinophenyl)-1-butanone. Examples of preferred α-amino acetophenones include 1-[4-(2-hydroxyethylthio)phenyl]-2-methyl-2-morpholinopropan-1-one, 1-(4-mercaptophenyl)-2-methyl-2-morpholinopropan-1-one, 1-(4-allylthiophenyl)-2-methyl-2-morpholinopropan-1-one, 1-[4-(2-methoxycarbonylethylthio)-phenyl]-2-methyl-2-morpholinopropan-1-one, 1-[4-(dimethylaminomethylthio)-phenyl]-2-morpholinopropan-1-one, 2-methyl-1-[4-(methylsulfynyl)-phenyl]-2-morpholinopropan-1-one, and 2-methyl-1-[4-(methylthio)-phenyl]-2-piperidinopropan-1-one, and others from columns 7-11 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,145,885. Other preferred coatable compositions in accordance with the invention are those wherein the α-amino acetophenone is 2-methyl-1-(4-[methylthio]phenyl)-2-(4-morpholinyl)-propan-1-one, and the photoinitiator system further consists of a thioxanthone. Preferred thioxanthones include: 2-isopropylthioxanthone, 2-chlorothioxanthone, 2-dodecylthioxanthone, 1-methoxycarbonylthioxanthone, 2-ethoxycarbonylthioxanthone, 3-(2-methoxyethoxycarbonyl)-thioxanthone, 4-butoxycarbonylthioxanthone, 3-butoxycarbonyl-7-methylthioxanthone, 1-cyano-3-chlorothioxanthone, 2-morpholinomethylthioxanthone, and those other xanthones disclosed in column 17 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,145,885. Particularly preferred is 2-isopropylthioxanthone. Yet other preferred coatable compositions within the invention are those wherein the compound of the photoinitiator system is an acylphosphine oxide, preferably selected from the group consisting of monoacylphosphine oxides and diacylphosphine oxides. Acylphosphine oxides useful in the invention include dibenzyl-(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phosphine oxide, bis(2-phenylethyl)-(2,6-dichlorobenzoyl)-phosphine oxide, bis(2-phenylpropyl)-(2,6-dimethoxybenzoyl)-phosphine oxide, bis(2-phenylpropyl)-(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phosphine oxide, dibutyl-(2-methyl-2-phenylbutyryl)-phosphine oxide, 6-(2,6-dichlorobenzoyl)-6-phosphabicyclo[2.1.1]hexan-6-oxide, bis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-2-phenylpropylphosphine oxide, bis(methylthio-2-phenylbutyryl)-cyclohexylphosphine oxide, diphenyl 2,4,6-trimethyl benzoylphosphine oxide, and others from European Patent Application no. 0 413 657 A2, published February 20, 1991, incorporated by reference herein. A particularly preferred coatable composition in accordance with the invention is that wherein the first compound is diphenyl 2,4,6-trimethyl benzoylphosphine oxide. Suitable sensitizers include compounds such as ketones, coumarin dyes ( e.g. , keto coumarins), xanthene dyes, acridine dyes, thiazole dyes, and others listed in column 4, line 30 through column 5, line 11 of U.S. Pat. No. 4,735,632. The preferred 1,2-diketone is camphorquinone. The coatable compositions of the invention may comprise a sensitizer in combination with bimolecular photoinitiators. For instance, α-benzyl-2-N,N-dimethylamino-1-(4-morpholinophenyl)-butan-1-one may be sensitized with isopropylthioxanthone, and the composition may include a benzophenone/amine system. It is also considered within the invention to include cyclopentadienyl iron (II) arene+ XF6- salts in the sulfonium salts or iodonium salts, if a part of the resin system can be cationically cured or halomethyl-s-triazines which produce chloride radicals. Such initiators and the like are mentioned in Dietliker, pages 329-478, which may also be used in conjunction with sensitizers. The photoinitiator systems useful in the invention may also comprise (in addition to α-cleavage compounds having molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution ranging from about 4 to about 400 liter/mole-cm in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers) ternary photoinitiators as disclosed in Oxman et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,735,632, in which the photoinitiator system comprises photochemically effective amounts of (i) diaryliodonium salt, (ii) sensitizer capable of absorbing light somewhere within the range of 300 to 1000 nanometers and capable of sensitizing 2-methyl-4,6-bis(trichloromethyl)-s-triazine, and (iii) electron donor compound which is different from the sensitizer and wherein zero < E ox (donor) ≤ E ox (p-dimethoxybenzene). Coatable compositions in accordance with the invention preferably consist essentially of from about 0.1 to about 10 weight percent photoinitiator system (more preferably from about 0.1 to about 2 weight percent), from about 50 to about 85 weight percent abrasive particles, and from about 10 to about 45 weight percent free radical polymerizable resin, all weight percentages based on total weight of the coatable composition. Other photoinitiators not falling within the molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution ranging from about 4 to about 400 liter/mole-cm in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers may be combined with the coatable compositions of the invention, depending on the coatable composition chemistry. Examples of useful conventional initiators that generate a free radical upon exposure to radiation or heat include organic peroxides, azo compounds, quinones, benzophenones, nitroso compounds, acryl halides, hydrozones, mercapto compounds, pyrylium compounds, triacrylimidazoles, bisimidazoles, chloroalkyltriazines, benzoin ethers, benzil ketals, acetophenone derivatives not having molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution ranging from about 4 to about 400 liter/mole-cm in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers, and mixtures thereof. Examples of conventional photoinitiators that when exposed to visible radiation generate a free radical are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,735,632. Cationic photoinitiators which generate an acid source to initiate polymerization of addition polymerizable resins may also be employed in combination with the coatable compositions of the invention. Cationic photoinitiators can include a salt having an onium cation and a halogen containing complex anion of a metal or metalloid. Other useful cationic photoinitiators include salts of organometallic complex cations and halogen-containing complex anions of a metal or metalloid, which are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,751,138. Still other useful cationic photoinitiators are organometallic salts and onium salts, described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,985,340, and European Patent Applications 306,161 and 306,162, both published March 8, 1989. Yet other useful cationic photoinitiators include ionic salts of an organometallic complex in which the metal is selected from the elements of Periodic Group IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB and VIIIB, such salts being described in European Patent Application 109,581 (published May 30, 1984). Polymerizable Resins Polymerizable resins useful in the invention may be selected from those commonly used in the abrasive art. The resin should be selected such that it will allow production of an abrasive article having desired properties for the intended use of the abrasive article. Desired properties may include, for example, toughness, heat resistance, good adhesion of binder to backing, high cut, and the like. In some instances it is also desired that the workpiece have a smooth surface finish. Addition polymerizable resins useful in the practice of the invention are those resins capable of being initiated by exposure to radiation, a photoinitiator, a thermal initiator, or combination of these. Suitable radiation sources include those which produce ultraviolet radiation, infrared radiation, and visible light. Addition polymerizable resins polymerize via a free radical mechanism or an ionic mechanism. Free radicals or ions may be produced by addition of photoinitiators or thermal initiators to the resins. When a photoinitiator alone is used, or when it is exposed to non-particle radiation such as ultraviolet radiation or visible light, the photoinitiator generates free radicals. The free radicals initiate the polymerization of the resin. Examples of typical and preferred addition polymerizable resins for use in the binder precursors of the invention include: polymers, oligomers, and monomers which are ethylenically unsaturated, for example acrylated resins such as isocyanurate resins having at least one pendant acrylate group (the triacrylate of tris(hydroxyethyl) isocyanurate would be one example), acrylated urethane resins, acrylated epoxy resins, and isocyanate derivatives having at least one pendant acrylate group. It is to be understood that mixtures of the above resins could also be employed. The term "acrylated" is meant to include monoacrylated, monomethacrylated, multi-acrylated, and multi-methacrylated monomers, oligomers and polymers. Low molecular weight acrylates are one preferred type of reactive diluent. Acrylate reactive diluents preferred for use in the invention typically have a molecular weight ranging from about 100 to about 500, and include ethylene glycol diacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate, pentaerythritol triacrylate, hexanediol diacrylate, triethylene glycol diacrylate, trimethylolpropane triacrylate, glycerol triacrylate, pentaerthyitol triacrylate, pentaerythritol trimethacrylate, pentaerythritol tetraacrylate and pentaerythritol tetramethacrylate. Methyl methacrylate and ethyl methacrylate may also be used. The inventive compositions may also contain addition polymerizable monomers, such as styrene, divinylbenzene, vinyl toluene, acrylamides, and the like. It is noteworthy to mention that monomers which are solids at room temperature may be used if combined with a suitable low molecular weight diluent compound. This is the case with the triacrylate of tris(hydroxyethyl)isocyanurate ("TATHEIC"), one particularly preferred resin, which is a solid at room temperature. When this monomer is used, the "polymerizable resin" for which viscosity reduction is attained includes a compound, which may or may not be reactive with the monomer, but preferably is reactive with the monomer (and is therefore considered another monomer). One preferred low molecular weight diluent for room temperature solid acrylated monomers is trimethylol propane triacrylate ("TMPTA"); however, diluents such as these are more correctly referred to as reactive diluents when the polymerizable resin is already liquid at room temperature (i.e., about 25°C). When TATHEIC is used, the combination of TATHEIC/TMPTA is considered as the polymerizable resin in the slurries and dispersions of the invention. The weight ratio of TATHEIC/TMPTA may range from about 1:3 to about 3:1, more preferably from about 1:2.5 to about 2.5:1, most preferably about 1:2.33. Diluents may also be used in the slurries and dispersions of the invention. As used herein the term "diluent" connotes a low molecular weight (less than 500) organic material that may or may not decrease the viscosity of the binder precursor to which they are added. Diluents may be reactive with the resin or inert. Acrylated isocyanurate oligomer resins are the presently preferred addition polymerizable resins. Isocyanurate resins useful in the invention include those having at least one pendant acrylate group, which are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,652,274. As mentioned previously, one particularly preferred isocyanurate material is TATHEIC combined with TMPTA. Acrylated urethane oligomer resins are preferably acrylate esters of hydroxy-terminated, isocyanate-extended polyester or polyether polyols esterified with low molecular weight (less than about 500) acrylates (such as 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate). The number average molecular weight of preferred acrylated urethane oligomer resins ranges from about 300 to about 10,000, more preferably from about 400 to about 7,000. Examples of commercially available acrylated urethane oligomer resins are those marketed under the trade designations "UVITHANE 782" (available from Morton Thiokol Chemical) and "CMD 6600", "CMD 8400", and "CMD 8805" (available from Radcure Specialties). Acrylated epoxy oligomer resins are acrylate esters of epoxy resins, such as the diacrylate esters of bisphenol-A epoxy resin. Examples of commercially available acrylated epoxy oligomer resins include those known under the trade designations "CMD 3500", "CMD 3600", and "CMD 3700", also available from Radcure Specialties. Optionally, non-radiation curable resins, such as thermally curable resins selected from the group consisting of phenolic resins, urea-aldehyde resins, epoxy resins, urethane resins, melamine resins and combinations thereof, may be employed in the coatable compositions of the invention, as long as they are not present in concentrations which might be deleterious to the photoinitiator system. Examples of useful optional commercially available phenolic resins include those known by the trade designations "Durez" and "Varcum" from Occidental Chemicals Corp.; "Resinox" from Monsanto; and "Arofene" and "Arotap" from Ashland Chemical Co. Urethanes useful in the invention include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,933,373, which are the reaction product of short-chain, active hydrogen functional monomer, such as trimethylolpropane monoallyl ether, ethanol amine, and the like; long-chain, active hydrogen functional diene prepolymer, such as the hydroxy-terminated polybutadiene commercially available from Atochem Inc. under the trade designation "Polybd R-45HT"; a polyisocyanate, and a crosslinking initiator. Suitable crosslinking initiators are organic peroxides, such as benzoyl peroxide, and the like. Urethane catalysts may be used, although not essential, such as those mentioned in U.S. Pat. No. 4,202,957. Epoxy resins have an oxirane (epoxide) ring and are polymerized by ring opening. Epoxy resins which lack ethylenically unsaturated bonds require the use of photoinitiators. These resins can vary greatly in the nature of their backbones and substituent groups. For example, the backbone may be of any type normally associated with epoxy resins and substituent groups thereon can be any group free of an active hydrogen atom that is reactive (or capable of being made reactive) with an oxirane ring at room temperature. Representative examples of acceptable substituent groups include halogens, ester groups, ether groups, sulfonate groups, siloxane groups, nitro groups and phosphate groups. Examples of preferred epoxy resins lacking ethylenically unsaturated groups include 2,2-bis[4-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)phenyl] propane (diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A) and commercially available materials under the trade designation "Epon 828", "Epon 1004" and "Epon 1001F" available from Shell Chemical Co., "DER-331", "DER-332" and "DER-334" available from the Dow Chemical Co. Other suitable epoxy resins lacking ethylenically unsaturated groups include glycidyl ethers of phenol formaldehyde novolak resins (e.g., "DEN-431" and "DEN-438" available from the Dow Chemical Co.). Other useful reactive diluents include monoallyl, polyallyl, and polymethallyl esters and amides of carboxylic acids (such as diallyl phthalate, diallyl adipate, and N,N-diallyladipamide); tris(2-acryloyloxyethyl)isocyanurate, 1,3,5-tri(2-methacryloxyethyl)-s-triazine, acrylamide, methylacrylamide, N-methylacrylamide, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, N-vinylpyrrolidone, and N-vinylpiperidone. It should be understood that polymerizable resins which are not photoinitiated by the photoinitiator systems described herein may be used in articles of the invention, for example, as size or make coatings in coated and nonwoven abrasive articles. Curing Conditions Detailed examples of curing conditions for the coatable compositions of the invention are given in the Examples section. For the purposes of this invention the radiation used includes at least some portion of the "UV/visible" spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers. UV (ultraviolet) radiation refers to electromagnetic radiation having a wavelength within the range of about 200 to about 400 nanometers, preferably within the range of about 250 to 400 nanometers. Visible radiation refers to electromagnetic radiation having a wavelength within the range of about 400 to about 800 nanometers, and preferably in the range of about 400 to about 550 nanometers. Free radically and other addition polymerizable resins require an initiator such as a photoinitiator and/or radiation energy. Preferably, photoinitiators and radiation energy are used simultaneously. As thermally curable resins, such as phenolic resins and urea-formaldehyde resins, as well as non-free-radically polymerizable addition resins, may be present in the coatable compositions of the invention, and since addition polymerization rates generally increase with temperature, the coatable compositions may be simultaneously and/or sequentially exposed to radiation energy and thermal energy. For thermal energy, the temperature typically and preferably ranges from about 50°C to about 250°C, for residence times ranging from about 15 minutes to about 16 hours (longer residence times requiring lower temperatures). For free radical addition polymerization in the absence of heating while exposing to solely UV or visible radiation, in order to more completely polymerize all ethylenically unsaturated monomer, the UV or visible energy level should be at least about 100 milliJoules/cm 2 , more preferably ranging from about 100 to about 700 milliJoules/cm 2 , particularly preferably from about 400 to about 600 milliJoules/cm 2 . The total amount of energy required is primarily dependent upon the resinous adhesive chemistry and secondarily on the thickness and optical density of the binder precursor. Lapping Abrasive Articles and Methods of Production An essential step to make inventive abrasive articles using the coatable compositions of the invention is to prepare the coatable composition, also referred to herein as a "slurry". The slurry is made by combining together by any suitable mixing technique the free radically polymerizable resin, the abrasive particles, the photoinitiator system and the optional additives, including any diluents. Examples of mixing techniques include low shear and high shear mixing, with high shear mixing being preferred. Ultrasonic energy may also be utilized in combination with the mixing step to lower the abrasive slurry viscosity. Typically, the abrasive particles and any grinding aid used are gradually added into the binder precursor. The amount of air bubbles in the slurry can be minimized by pulling a vacuum during the mixing and/or coating steps (or between the mixing and coating steps). In some instances it is preferred to heat, generally in the range of 30 to 70°C, the slurry to lower the viscosity. It is important the slurry have rheological properties that allow the slurry to coat well and in which the abrasive particles and other optional particulate matter, such as grinding aid particles, do not settle out of the slurry. The slurry is coated on at least the front surface of a backing. This coating can be accomplished by any conventional technique such as roll coating, gravure coating, knife coating, spray coating, transfer coating, vacuum die coating, die coating and the like. After the slurry is coated onto the backing, the slurry is exposed to a radiation source producing radiation in at least some portion of the "UV/visible" spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers, and other optional energy sources, depending on the resins used, to initiate polymerization, cure the binder precursors and form an abrasive composite. The resulting abrasive article is generally ready for use. However, in some instances other processes may still be necessary such as humidification or flexing. The abrasive article can be converted into any desired form such as a cone, endless belt, sheet, disc, and the like, before the abrasive article is used. Lapping abrasives, examples of which are illustrated in FIGs. 1 and 2, are a type of coated abrasive. Referring to the drawing figures, FIG. 1 is an illustration (enlarged) of a lapping abrasive article 10 within the invention having a backing 11 having an abrasive coating 16 bonded to at least the front surface 17 of the backing. The abrasive coating 16 comprises a homogeneous mixture of a plurality of abrasive particles 13, a binder 14 and optionally a grinding aid 15. The binder 14 serves also to bond the abrasive coating 16 to the front surface 17 of the backing 11. The abrasive particles are essentially uniformly dispersed throughout the binder and grinding aid mixture. The lapping abrasive article embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1 may be made by coating a coatable composition within the invention onto the backing by any suitable technique previously mentioned, it being understood that a more rough or varied surface may be produced. The composition is then exposed to a radiation source producing radiation in at least some portion of the "UV/visible" spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers, and other optional energy sources, depending on the resins used, to cure the binder precursors and form an abrasive composite. Alternatively, the coatable composition may be applied to the backing through a screen to create a patterned abrasive surface. In some instances it is preferred that the abrasive coating be present as precisely shaped abrasive composites, such as illustrated in FIG. 2. In order to make this type of abrasive article, a production tool is generally required. The production tool contains a plurality of cavities. These cavities are essentially the inverse shape of the abrasive composite and are responsible for generating the shape of the abrasive composites. The dimensions of the cavities are selected to provide the desired shape and dimensions of the abrasive composites. If the shape or dimensions of the cavities are not properly fabricated, the resulting production tool will not provide the desired dimensions for the abrasive composites. The cavities can be present in a dot like pattern with spaces between adjacent cavities or the cavities can butt up against one another. It is preferred that the cavities butt up against one another. Additionally, the shape of the cavities is selected such that the cross-sectional area of the abrasive composite decreases away from the backing. The production tool can be a belt, a sheet, a continuous sheet or web, a coating roll such as a rotogravure roll, a sleeve mounted on a coating roll, or die. The production tool can be composed of metal, (e.g., nickel), metal alloys, or plastic. The metal production tool can be fabricated by any conventional technique such as engraving, hobbing, electroforming, diamond turning, and the like. One preferred technique for a metal production tool is diamond turning. A thermoplastic production tool in sheet form can be replicated off a metal master tool. The master tool will have the inverse pattern desired for the production tool. The master tool can be made in the same manner as the metal production tool. The master tool is preferably made out of metal, e.g., copper which is electroplated onto a plastic master, the latter produced by diamond turning. The thermoplastic sheet material can be heated and optionally along with the master tool such that the thermoplastic material is embossed with the master tool pattern by pressing the two together. The thermoplastic material can also be extruded or cast onto the master tool. In both cases, the thermoplastic material is cooled below its melt flow temperature to produce the production tool. Examples of preferred thermoplastic production tool materials include polyester, polycarbonate, polyvinyl chloride, polypropylene, polyethylene and combinations thereof. If a thermoplastic production tool is utilized, then care must be taken not to generate excessive heat that may distort the tool. The production tool may also contain a release coating to permit easier release of the abrasive article from the production tool. Examples of such release coatings for metal production tools include hard carbide, nitrides or borides coatings. Examples of release coatings for thermoplastics include silicones and fluorochemicals, either grafted onto, or impregnated into the thermoplastic, or overlayed onto the thermoplastic. Referring specifically to FIG. 2, there is illustrated, in cross section, enlarged, an abrasive article embodiment 20 comprising a backing 21 onto which a plurality of precisely shaped abrasive composites 22 are separated by boundary 25. The boundary or boundaries associated with the composite shape result in one abrasive composite being separated to some degree from another adjacent abrasive composite. To form an individual abrasive composite, a portion of the boundaries forming the shape of the abrasive composite must be separated from one another. Note that in the article illustrated in FIG. 2, the base or a portion of the abrasive composite closest to the backing can abutt with its neighboring abrasive composite. (Note that "neighboring" does not necessarily mean "adjacent".) Abrasive composites 22 comprise a plurality of abrasive particles 24 that are dispersed in a binder 23 optionally containing grinding aid particles 26. It is also within the scope of this invention to have a combination of abrasive composites bonded to a backing in which some of the abrasive composites abutt, while other abrasive composites have open spaces between them. One preferred method of making a lapping coated abrasive such as illustrated in FIG. 2 is to first coat a coatable composition (sometimes referred to herein as a slurry) within the invention onto at least one side of a backing, applied using one of the previously mentioned suitable techniques. One preferred backing 21 is a polymeric film, such as polyester film that contains an ethylene acrylic acid copolymer primer. Second, the slurry-coated backing is contacted with the outer surface of a patterned production tool. The slurry wets the patterned surface to form an intermediate article. Third, the slurry is exposed to radiation in at least some portion of the "UV/visible" spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers, and other optional energy sources, as previously described which at least partially cures or gels the resin in the slurry before the intermediate article is removed from the outer surface of the production tool. Fourth, the intermediate article is removed from the production tool. The four steps are preferably carried out continuously. Alternatively, the slurry may be first applied to the production tool in the methods illustrated in FIGs. 3 and 4. In FIG. 3, backing 41 leaves an unwind station 42 and at the same time the production tool 46 leaves an unwind station 45. Production tool 46 is coated with slurry by means of coating station 44. It is possible to heat the slurry and/or subject the slurry to ultrasonics prior to coating to lower the viscosity. The coating station can be any conventional coating means such as knife coater, curtain coater, die coater, drop die coater, or vacuum die coater. During coating the formation of air bubbles should be minimized. The preferred coating technique is a vacuum fluid bearing die, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,594,865, 4,959,265, and 5,077,870. After the production tool is coated, the backing and the slurry are brought into contact by any means such that the slurry wets the front surface of the backing. In FIG. 3, the slurry is brought into contact with a "front" surface the backing by means of a contact nip roll 47. Contact nip roll 47 forces the resulting construction against support drum 43. A source of energy 48 providing radiation at least some portion of the "UV/visible" spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers, and other optional energy sources, transmits a sufficient amount of energy into the slurry to at least partially cure the binder precursor. The term "partial cure" means that the binder precursor is polymerized to such a state that the cured slurry releases from the production tool. The binder precursor can be more completely cured, once it is removed from the production tool, by an appropriate energy source. Following this, the production tool is rewound on mandrel 49 so that the production tool can be reused again. Additionally, abrasive article 120 is wound on mandrel 121. If the binder precursor is partially cured, the binder precursor can then be more fully cured by exposure to an energy source, preferably a combination of UV/visible radiation and thermal energy. Alternatively the inventive coatable compositions can be coated onto the backing and not into the cavities of the production tool. The slurry coated backing is then brought into contact with the production tool such that the slurry flows into the cavities of the production tool. The remaining steps to make the abrasive article are the same as detailed above. Another method is illustrated in FIG. 4. Backing 51 leaves an unwind station 52 and the slurry 54 is coated into the cavities of the production tool 55 by means of the coating station 53. The slurry can be coated onto the tool by any one of many techniques previously mentioned. Again, it is possible to heat the slurry and/or subject the slurry to ultrasonics prior to coating to lower the viscosity. During coating the formation of air bubbles should be minimized. Then, the backing and the production tool containing the abrasive slurry are brought into contact by a nip roll 56 such that the slurry wets the front surface of the backing. Next, the binder precursor in the slurry is at least partially cured by exposure to an energy source 57 providing radiation in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers, and other optional energy sources. After this at least partial cure, the slurry is converted to an abrasive composite 59 that is bonded or adhered to the backing. The resulting abrasive article is removed from the production tool by means of nip rolls 58 and wound onto a rewind station 60. In this method the preferred backing is polyester film. Regarding this latter method, the slurry may alternatively be coated directly onto the front surface of the backing. The slurry coated backing is then brought into contact with the production tool such that the slurry wets into the cavities of the production tool. The remaining steps to make the abrasive article are the same as detailed above. The free radically polymerizable resin is cured by radiation energy in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers. The radiation energy can be transmitted through the production tool so long as the production tool does not appreciably absorb the radiation energy. Additionally, the radiation energy source should not appreciably degrade the production tool. In each of the methods wherein a patterned tool is coated with a slurry, it is most advantageous if the slurry has a viscosity that will allow the slurry to fill the depressions or cavities in the patterned surface. Because the pattern of the production tool imparts a pattern to the abrasive articles of the invention, these methods are particularly useful in making "structured" abrasive articles. A structured abrasive article is an abrasive article wherein composites, comprising abrasive particles distributed in a binder, have a precise shape. In some instances the boundaries forming the shape are planar. For shapes that have planes, there are at least three planes. The number of planes for a given shape can vary depending upon the desired geometry, for instance the number of planes can range from three to over 20. Generally, there are between three to ten planes, preferably between three to six planes. These planes intersect to form the desired shape and the angles at which these planes intersect will determine the shape dimensions. The abrasive composite shape can be any shape, but it is preferably a geometric shape such as a rectangle, cone, semicircle, circle, triangle, square, hexagon, pyramid, octagon and the like. The preferred shapes are pyramids and truncated pyramids, the bases being either three or four sided. It is also preferred that the abrasive composite cross sectional surface area decreases away from the backing. This variable surface area results in a non-uniform pressure as the abrasive composite wears during use. Additionally, during manufacture of the abrasive article, this variable surface area results in easier release of the abrasive composite from the production tool. In general there are at least 5 individual abrasive composites per square cm. In some instances, there may be at least 500 individual abrasive composites/square cm. Additional steps to make abrasive articles according to these methods are further described in U.S. Patent No. 5,152,917 and USSN 08/004,929 (Spurgeon et al.), filed January 14, 1993. Randomly shaped abrasives composites may be made by the tooling and procedures described in copending serial no. 08/120,300, filed September 13, 1993. In this aspect of the invention, at least 10%, preferably at least 30%, more preferably at least 50% and most preferably at least 60% of the abrasive composites have an adjacent abrasive composite that has a different dimension. These different dimensions can pertain to the abrasive composite shape, angle between planar boundaries or dimensions of the abrasive composite. The result of these different dimensions for neighboring abrasive composites results in an abrasive article that produces a relatively finer surface finish on the workpiece being abraded or refined. Method of Making Abrasive Articles Coated abrasive articles may be manufactured using the coatable compositions of the invention. Backing Materials for Coated Abrasives The backing can be any number of various materials conventionally used as backings in the manufacture of coated abrasives, such as paper, cloth, film, vulcanized fiber, woven and nonwoven materials, and the like, or a combination of two or more of these materials or treated versions thereof. The choice of backing material will depend on the intended application of the abrasive article. The strength of the backing should be sufficient to resist tearing or other damage in use, and the thickness and smoothness of the backing should allow achievement of the product thickness and smoothness desired for the intended application. The adhesion of the inventive coatable composition or other binder to the backing should also be sufficient to prevent significant shelling of individual abrasive particles or the abrasive coating during normal use. In some applications it is also preferable that the backing be waterproof. The thickness of the backing should be sufficient to provide the strength desired for the intended application; nevertheless, it should not be so thick as to affect the desired flexibility in the coated abrasive product. For lapping coated abrasives, one preferred backing is polymeric film, such as polyester film, and that the film be primed with a material, such as ethylene acrylic acid copolymer, to promote adhesion of the inventive slurry or dispersion and resulting abrasive composite to the film. It may be preferable to utilize a backing transparent to UV/visible radiation. In the case of a woven backing, it is sometimes preferable to fill the interstices of the backing with at least one coating before the application of an inventive coatable composition. Coatings used for this purpose are called saturant, back or presize coatings, as previously described, depending on how and to what surface of the backing the coating is applied. The backing may comprise a laminate of backings made by laminating two or more plies of either similar or dissimilar backing materials. For example, the backing can be laminated to a stiffer, more rigid substrate, such as a metal plate, to produce a coated abrasive article having an abrasive coating supported on a rigid substrate. The surface of the backing not containing the abrasive coating may also contain a pressure-sensitive adhesive or one member of a hook and loop type attachment system so that the abrasive article can be secured to a back-up pad. Examples of pressure-sensitive adhesives suitable for this purpose include rubber-based adhesives, acrylate-based adhesives, and silicone-based adhesives. Abrasive Particles Individual abrasive particles may be selected from those commonly used in the abrasive art, however, the abrasive particles (size and composition) will be chosen with the application of the abrasive article in mind. In choosing an appropriate abrasive particle, characteristics such as light absorption, hardness, compatibility with the intended workpiece, particle size, reactivity with the workpiece, as well as heat conductivity may be considered. A key aspect of the present invention is that abrasive particles which were previously thought to be too dark in color to be useful in addition polymerizable binder systems may now be used, and at quite substantial weight percentages. This is quite important as the darker minerals, such as brown heat-treated aluminum oxide, typically achieve higher cut than white aluminum oxide of the same grade. (Black silicon carbide may be used in the compositions of the invention, but only in minor amounts or in combination with lighter colored abrasive particles, such as green silicon carbide). The composition of abrasive particles useful in the invention can be divided into two classes: natural abrasives and manufactured abrasives. Examples of useful natural abrasives include: diamond, corundum, emery, garnet (off-red color), buhrstone, chert, quartz, sandstone, chalcedony, flint, quartzite, silica, feldspar, pumice and talc. Examples of manufactured abrasives include: boron carbide, cubic boron nitride, fused alumina, ceramic aluminum oxide, heat treated aluminum oxide (both brown and dark gray), alumina zirconia, glass, silicon carbide (preferably green, although small amounts of black may be tolerated), iron oxides, tantalum carbide, cerium oxide, tin oxide, titanium carbide, synthetic diamond, manganese dioxide, zirconium oxide, and silicon nitride. Abrasive particles useful in the invention typically and preferably have a particle size ranging from about 0.1 micrometer to about 1500 micrometers, more preferably ranging from about 0.1 micrometer to about 1300 micrometers. It is preferred that abrasive particles used in the invention have a Moh's hardness of at least 8, more preferably above 9; however, for specific applications, particles having Moh's hardness less than 8 may be used. The term "abrasive particle" includes agglomerates of individual abrasive particles. An abrasive agglomerate is formed when a plurality of abrasive particles are bonded together with a binder to form a larger abrasive particle which may have a specific particulate structure. The plurality of particles which form the abrasive agglomerate may comprise more than one type of abrasive particle, and the binder used may be the same as or different from the binders used to bind the agglomerate to a backing. Precisely shaped abrasive particles may also be employed. These precisely shaped abrasive particles are produced essentially by coating a structured tool, similar to that described herein for making structured abrasive articles, with a slurry of abrasive particles and binder precursor, curing the binder precursor, and detaching the resulting composites from the tool by exposing the tool to an ultrasonic horn operating at about 20,000 Hz. Optional Binder Precursor Additives The coatable compositions of the invention, either with or devoid of abrasive particles, and thus the cured binders, may also comprise optional additives common to the skilled artisan in the abrasive art such as fibers, lubricants, wetting agents, surfactants, pigments, dyes, plasticizers, suspending agents, fillers (including grinding aids), rheology modifiers, coupling agents, and the like. The amounts of these materials will depend on the desired properties of the binder and the final use of the abrasive article which is being manufactured. A. Fillers and Grinding Aids Binders used to produce abrasive articles may, and preferably do, contain fillers. Fillers are typically organic or inorganic particulates dispersed within the resin and may modify either the binder precursor or the cured binder's properties, or both, or may simply be used to reduce cost. The addition of a filler, at least up to a certain extent, typically increases the hardness and toughness of the cured binder. The filler is typically and preferably an inorganic particulate having an average particle size ranging from about 1 micrometer to about 100 micrometers, preferably from about 5 to about 50 micrometers, and most preferably from about 10 to about 25 micrometers. Moreover, the filler will preferably have a specific gravity in the range of 1.5 to 4.50, and the average particle size of the filler will preferably be less than the average particle size of the abrasive particles, depending on the ultimate use of the article. Examples of useful non-reactive fillers for this invention include: metal carbonates such as calcium carbonate (in the form of chalk, calcite, marl, travertine, marble or limestone), calcium magnesium carbonate, sodium carbonate, and magnesium carbonate; silicas such as quartz, glass beads, glass bubbles and glass fibers; silicates such as talc, clays, feldspar, mica, calcium silicate, calcium metasilicate, sodium aluminosilicate, and sodium silicate; metal sulfates such as calcium sulfate, barium sulfate, sodium sulfate, aluminum sodium sulfate, and aluminum sulfate; gypsum; vermiculite; wood flour; aluminum trihydrate; carbon black; metal oxides such as calcium oxide (lime), aluminum oxide, titanium dioxide, alumina hydrate, alumina monohydrate; and metal sulfites such as calcium sulfite. Generally, fillers are inorganic particulate matter which comprising materials which are substantially inert or non-reactive with respect to the grinding surface acted upon by the abrasive. Occasionally, however, active (i.e. reactive) fillers are used, sometimes referred to in the abrasives art as grinding aids. These fillers interact beneficially with the grinding surface during use. In particular, it is believed in the art that the grinding aid may either 1) decrease the friction between the abrasive particles and the workpiece being abraded, 2) prevent the abrasive particle from "capping", i.e. prevent metal particles from becoming welded to the tops of the abrasive particles, 3) decrease the interface temperature between the abrasive particles and the workpiece or 4) decrease the required grinding force. Grinding aids encompass a wide variety of different materials and can be inorganic or organic based. Examples of chemical groups of grinding aids useful in this invention include waxes, organic halide compounds, halide salts and metals and their alloys. The organic halide compounds will typically break down during abrading and release a halogen acid or a gaseous halide compound. Examples of such materials include chlorinated waxes like tetrachloronaphthalene, pentachloronaphthalene; and polyvinyl chloride. Examples of halide salts include sodium chloride, potassium cryolite, sodium cryolite, ammonium cryolite, potassium tetrafluoroborate, sodium tetrafluoroborate, silicon fluorides, potassium chloride, magnesium chloride. Examples of metals include, tin, lead, bismuth, cobalt, antimony, cadmium, iron, and titanium. Other miscellaneous grinding aids include sulfur, organic sulfur compounds, graphite and metallic sulfides. The above mentioned examples of grinding aids is meant to be a representative showing of grinding aids, and it is not meant to encompass all grinding aids. Grinding aids are preferably used in slurries and binder precursor dispersions of the invention in amounts ranging from about 0.1 to about 10 dry weight percent, more preferably from about 0.5 to about 5.0 weight percent, based on total weight of binder precursor solution. If non-reactive fillers are employed they may be used up to 50 dry weight percent. Of the above, certain clays tend to produce a controlled erosion of the binder produced from the inventive coatable compositions, which is especially important in lapping coated abrasives. B. Rheology Modifiers Rheology modifying particles may be added to the coatable compositions of the invention, which have the effect of lowering the composition viscosity and reduce the rate of sedimentation of abrasive and/or filler particles in the binder precursors. The addition of modifying particles, whose average particle size is preferably less than the average particle size of the abrasive or filler particles, act to reduce the viscosity of coatable compositions, and retain abrasive and filler particles in suspension for long periods of time without agitation. Preferably, the average particle size of the modifying particles is less than about 100 millimicrometers, more preferably less than about 50 millimicrometers. Individual modifying particles may range in particle size from about 1 millimicrometer to about 100 millimicrometers, more preferably ranging from about 10 millimicrometers to about 25 millimicrometers, depending on the average particle size of the abrasive and/or filler particles in the coatable composition. Preferred fillers include silica particles such as those available from the Degussa Corp., Ridgefield Park, NJ under the tradenames "OX-50", "R-812", and "P-820", the first being an amorphous silica having average particle size of 40 millimicrometers, surface area of 50 m 2 /g, the second being a hydrophobic fumed silica having average particle size of 7 millimicrometers and surface area of 260 m 2 /g, and the third being a precipitated silica having average particle size of 15 millimicrometers and surface area of 100 m 2 /g. Amorphous silica particles, if used, are preferably at least 90% pure, more preferably at least 95% pure and most preferably at least 99% pure. The major impurities are primarily other metal oxides such as aluminum oxide, iron oxide and titanium dioxide. Amorphous silica particles tend to be spherical in shape and have a density between 2.1 to 2.5 g/cm 3 . Modifying particles, if used, are preferably present in the coatable compositions from about 0.01 dry weight percent to about 30 dry weight percent, more preferably from about 0.05 to about 10 weight percent, and most preferably from about 0.5 to about 5 weight percent. C. Coupling Agents The inventive coatable compositions may also contain coupling agents if further viscosity reduction is required, such as disclosed by DeWald, U.S. Pat. No. 4,871,376, incorporated by reference herein. Coupling agents may also function to form a stronger bond between inorganic particles and organic binders, or the backing. An example of a coupling agent found suitable for use in this invention is the compound γ-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, available under the trade designation "A-174" from Union Carbide Corporation. Other suitable coupling agents are zircoaluminates, and titanates. Further examples which illustrate the use of silane, titanate, and zircoaluminate coupling agents are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,871,376. Coupling agents, if present, typically and preferably range from about 0.1 to about 3.0 dry weight percent of the total dry weight of the coatable compositions. D. Dyes, Pigments and Colorants The coatable compositions of the invention are particularly well suited for producing colored abrasive articles, such as colored lapping abrasive articles. Although some dyes are useful as sensitizers (as noted above), others are used primarily for aesthetic purposes. Suitable and preferred compounds for inclusion in the abrasive articles of the present invention are organic dyestuff compounds, inorganic pigments, and polymeric colorants. Suitable inorganic pigments useful in the invention include carbon black, titanium dioxide, chromium oxide, yellow iron oxide, red iron oxide, metal ferrites, and mixtures of these. Suitable organic dyestuffs include compounds such as phthalocyanine green and phthalocyanine blue. Suitable polymeric colorants include those known under the trade designations "Reactint Blue X17AB", "Reactint Yellow X15", "Reactint Red X52", and "Reactint Orange X38", all available from Milliken Research Corporation, Spartanburg, SC. These polymeric colorants are suitable for incorporation in a resin with the formation of covalent bonds between reactive moieties in the resin and the colorant. They have the following generic formula: R-(polymeric constituent-X) n wherein R is an organic dyestuff radical; the polymeric constituent is selected from polyalkyleneoxides and copolymers of polyalkylene oxides in which the alkylene moiety of the polymeric constituent contains 2 or more carbon atoms and such polymeric constituent has an average molecular weight of from about 44 to about 1500, more preferably ranging from about 80 to about 800; n is an integer of from 1 to about 6; and X is selected from -OH, -NH 2 and -SH. Compounds within this generic formula are described with particularity in U.S. Pat. No. 4,284,729. Although the '729 patent describes their use in thermosetting resins, U.S. Pat. No. 4,812,141 describes their use in thermoplastic resin systems. The organic dyestuff radical R may vary widely, depending to a large extent upon the desired color and properties of the final abrasive product. Preferably, for use in the present invention, the organic dyestuff radical R may be selected from nitroso, nitro, azo, including monoazo, diazo, and triazo, diarylmethane, triarylmethane, xanthene, acridene, methine, thiazole, indamine, azine, oxazine, or anthraquinone dyestuff radicals. Particularly useful are the azo, anthraquinone and triarylmethane dyestuff radicals. The polymeric constituent of the colorants within the above generic formula may be any suitable polymeric constituent which renders the resulting colorant liquid. Typical of such polymeric constituents which may be attached to the dyestuff radical are the polymeric epoxides, such as the polyalkylene oxides and copolymers thereof. Typical polyalkylene oxides and copolymers of same which may be employed to provide liquid colorants are polyethylene oxides, polypropylene oxides, polybutene oxides, copolymers of polyethylene oxides, polypropylene oxides and polybutene oxides, and other copolymers including block copolymers, in which a majority of the polymeric constituent is polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide and/or polybutene oxide. Such polymeric constituents may have an average molecular weight in the range of from about 44 to about 1500, preferably from about 80 to about 800. The above-mentioned polymeric colorants known under the trade designation "Reactint" have -OH as the X group. For such colorants, a "hydroxyl number" may be given to further characterized the colorant, wherein: hydroxyl number = 56,100/(hydroxyl eq. wt.) where "hydroxyl eq. wt." is the hydroxyl equivalent weight of the polymeric colorant. The colorants used in the Examples of the present invention have the following hydroxyl numbers: Polymeric Colorant Hydroxyl Number "Reactint Blue X17AB" 210 "Reactint Yellow X15" 84 "Reactint Red X52" 150 "Reactint Orange X38" 105 The amount and type of dye, pigment and/or colorant which may be used may vary in accordance with the particular resin, photoinitiator system, and other additives present. The amount and type desired may also vary according to the use of the article. When polymeric colorants known under the trade designation "Reactint" are employed in a slurry of 40 micrometer white aluminum oxide (69 parts), amorphous silica known under the trade designation "OX-50" (1 part), coupling agent known under the trade designation "A-174" (1 part), resin (29 parts of a blend consisting of 50 parts TATHEIC, 50 parts TMPTA, and 1 part photoinitiator), a typical amount of blue colorant available from Milliken Corp., Spartanburg, SC, known under the trade designation "Reactint Blue X17AB" would be about 0.3 part. It is anticipated that this amount could range from 0.1 part up to about 2 parts. Bonded Abrasives To make a bonded abrasive, a slurry of the invention is made consisting essentially of a polymerizable resin, abrasive particles and photoinitiator system. Optionally, coupling agents may also be introduced into the slurry before the slurry is poured into a mold. If a silane coupling agent is used, it may not necessary to coat the mold inner surface with a mold release agent. However, when desired, a mold release material may be coated on the surface of the mold to be exposed to the slurry, such as the mold release known under the trade designation "IMS Silicon Spray Parting Agent", no. S-512. Alternatively, the mold could have a non-stick surface, made of a material such as polytetrafluoroethylene or the like. The slurry is then poured into the selected mold, and subsequently subjected to curing conditions as previously described. Optionally, pressure may be applied to the system during curing. Once the resin is cured, the resulting bonded abrasive is removed from the mold. Nonwoven Abrasive Articles Nonwoven abrasive articles comprise an open, lofty, three-dimensional web of fibers bound together at points where they contact by a binder. The binder of such a construction may be made using the coatable compositions of the invention, wherein the binder may be applied by any one of a number of suitable techniques, such as roll coating, spray coating, and the like. Abrasive particles may or may not be attached to the fibers. Methods of making nonwoven web substrates for nonwoven abrasive articles are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,688,453 (Legacy et al.). Methods of Abrading a Workpiece Surface Another aspect of this invention pertains to a method of abrading a surface, in particular metal surfaces. This method involves bringing into frictional contact an abrasive article of this invention with a workpiece having a metal surface. The term "abrading" means that a portion of the metal workpiece is cut or removed by the abrasive article. Additionally, the surface finish associated with the workpiece surface is typically and preferably refined during this process. One typical surface finish measurement is R a ; R a is the arithmetic surface finish generally measured in microinches or micrometers. The surface finish can be measured by a profilometer, such as those known under the trade designations "Perthometer M4P" (available from Mahrseinpruef Corp., Cincinnati, OH) and "Surtronic 3" (made by Taylor Hobson Inc. and available from Mausmer Equipment Company, East Meadow, NY). The metal workpiece can be any type of metal such as mild steel, stainless steel, titanium, metal alloys, exotic metal alloys and the like. The workpiece may be flat or may have a shape or contour associated with it. Depending upon the application, the force at the abrading interface can range from about 0.1 kg to over 1000 kg. Generally this range is from 1 kg to 500 kg of force at the abrading interface. Also depending upon the application, there may be a liquid present during abrading. This liquid can be water and/or an organic compound. Examples of typical organic compounds include lubricants, oils, emulsified organic compounds, cutting fluids, soaps, and the like. These liquids may also contain other additives such as defoamers, degreasers, corrosion inhibitors, or the like. The abrasive article may oscillate at the abrading interface during use. In some instances, this oscillation may result in a finer surface on the workpiece being abraded. The abrasive articles of the invention can be used by hand or used in conjunction with a machine. At least one or both of the abrasive article and the workpiece is moved relative to the other during grinding. The abrasive article can be converted into a belt, tape roll, disc, sheet, and the like. For belt applications, the two free ends of an abrasive sheet are joined together and a splice is formed. It is also within the scope of this invention to use a spliceless belt like that described in the assignee's pending Patent Cooperation Treaty application no. 9312911, published July 8, 1993. Generally the endless abrasive belt traverses over at least one idler roll and a platen or contact wheel. The hardness of the platen or contact wheel is adjusted to obtain the desired rate of cut and workpiece surface finish. The abrasive belt speed depends upon the desired cut rate and surface finish. The belt dimensions can range from about 5 mm to 1,000 mm wide and from about 5 mm to 10,000 mm long. Abrasive tapes are continuous lengths of the abrasive article. They can range in width from about 1 mm to 1,000 mm, generally between 5 mm to 250 mm. The abrasive tapes are usually unwound, traverse over a support pad that forces the tape against the workpiece and then rewound. The abrasive tapes can be continuously fed through the abrading interface and can be indexed. The abrasive disc can range from about 50 mm to 1,000 mm in diameter. Typically abrasive discs are secured to a back-up pad by an attachment means. These abrasive discs can rotate between 100 to 20,000 revolutions per minute, typically between 1,000 to 15,000 revolutions per minute. In a preferred embodiment, the present application relates to a coatable composition according to any of claims 1 to 7, and methods for their production according to any of claims 8 to 11. Test Methods Test Procedure I: Finish Quality Test (R a ) Finish quality was measured in accordance with the commonly used statistical parameter "R a ", which is a measure of the average surface roughness. R a is defined in the publication "An Introduction to Surface Texture and Part Geometry" by Industrial Metal Products Incorporated, as the arithmetic average of the scratch depth in microinches. The ideal case is where a large amount of material is removed ("cut") from a workpiece while the R a value is low. Test Procedure II: Robot Belt Grinding Test The cured abrasive article was converted into an endless belt (7.6 cm wide X 335 cm length) and the cut performance measured on a constant load surface grinder. A preweighed 1018 mild steel workpiece approximately 2.5 cm X 5 cm X 18 cm was mounted in the specimen holder and the workpiece positioned vertically in the apparatus, with the 2.5 cm X 18 cm face facing a serrated rubber contact wheel (approximately 36 cm in diameter and having an 85 Shore A durometer) with one on one lands. The endless belt was placed over the rubber contact wheel such that the abrasive surface of the belt contacted the workpiece. The workpiece was then reciprocated through an 18 cm path at a rate of 20 cycles per minute while the belt, which was rotated at a speed of approximately 2050 meters per minute, was urged against the workpiece by a spring loaded plunger which maintained a load of 4.5 kilograms. Initial cut was determined after a one minute elapsed grinding time, after which the workpiece was removed and reweighed to determine the amount of stock that was removed. The procedure was repeated at one minute intervals, placing a new workpiece in the specimen holder prior to beginning a new grinding cycle. The endpoint of the test was 20 complete grinding cycles and the final cut data was the cut measured on the twentieth grinding cycle. Test Procedure III: Slide Action Disc Test A 17.8 cm (7 inch) diameter disc of the abrasive article was mounted on a beveled aluminum back-up pad and used to grind the face of a 1.25 cm X 18 cm 1018 mild steel workpiece. The disc was driven at 5,500 rpm while the portion of the disc overlying the beveled edge of the back-up pad contacted the workpiece, which was maintained at a 7° angle with respect to the disc, at about a 6 kg load. The workpiece was moved back and forth under the disc during the grinding test so as to contact, over time, the entire surface of the workpiece. The workpiece was replaced at one minute intervals and the test continued until the cut on the last workpiece was less than one gram. The initial cut was the amount of metal removed in the first minute of grinding. Likewise, the final cut was the amount of metal removed in the last minute of grinding and the total cut was the summation of the amount of metal removed throughout the test. Cut data is the average of four discs unless otherwise noted. Test Procedure IV: Schiefer Cut Test The abrasive article was converted into a disc (12.7 cm diameter) and secured to a foam back-up pad by means of a pressure sensitive adhesive. The abrasive disc/back-up pad assembly was installed on a Schiefer testing machine and the abrasive disc used to abrade a workpiece made of poly(methylmethacrylate). A load of 4.5 kg was applied to the abrasive disc and all of the testing was conducted beneath a water flood. The endpoint of the test was 500 revolutions or cycles of the abrasive disc. The poly(methylmethacrylate) workpiece was weighed before and after the test to determine the amount of material abraded away by the disc. Test Procedure V: Disc Cut Test The Disc Cut Test measures the amount of steel die rule cut or abraded as well as the amount of abrasive grain/web loss. A 17.8 cm diameter disc of the nonwoven abrasive was placed on a #917 Disc Pad Holder (available from 3M) and the holder mounted on the right angle drive unit of the test apparatus. The workpiece, which was oriented at a 7° angle from a normal position to the test disc, consisted of three equally spaced die rule steel blades (6.5 cm spacing), mounted such that the dull or blunt edge of the die rule impinged on the test disc. The abrasive disc was rotated at a speed of 4580 rpm and traversed the workpiece in 21 seconds while being urged against the workpiece by a constant load of 5.6 kg. Both the workpiece and the test disc were weighed before and after the test to determine the amount of metal cut or abraded from the workpiece and the amount of abrasive/web loss, respectively. Examples The following non-limiting Examples will further illustrate the invention. All parts, percentages, ratios, and the like, in the examples are by weight unless otherwise indicated. The abrasive articles produced and used in the Examples below were made according to the General Procedure for Preparing the Abrasive Article, and the abrasive articles were tested according to the test procedures described above. General Procedure for Preparing Structured Abrasive Articles The abrasive articles of the Examples employing coatable compositions of the invention were made generally in accordance with assignee's U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,917 (Pieper et al.). The slurry used in each case was coated onto a production tool having a pyramidal type pattern such that the slurry filled the tool. The pyramids were placed such that their bases were butted up against one another. A more exact explanation as to the size and shape of the projections of the production tool used in the Examples may be found hereinbelow. This pattern is generally illustrated in FIG. 2 herein (Figure 1 of Pieper et al.). Next, a polyester film having an ethylene acrylic acid copolymer primer was pressed against the production tool by means of a roller so that the slurry wetted the front surface of the polyester film. Ultraviolet and/or visible light was then transmitted through the polyester film and into the slurry. The light initiated the polymerization of the radiation curable resin contained in the slurry, resulting in the slurry being transformed into an abrasive composite, with the abrasive composite being adhered to the polyester film backing. The ultraviolet light sources used are discussed in the Examples. Finally, the polyester film/abrasive composite was separated from the production tool, providing a structured abrasive. Reference UV Spectral Data A portion of the UV spectral data, from 370 to 500 nanometers, of several α-cleavage photoiniators of the invention, as well as two comparative α-cleavage photoinitiators and one reference initiator which are not of the invention, are shown below in Tables I-VIII. The spectra 1 and 2 (Tables I and II) and comparative spectra 1 and 2 (Tables III and IV), illustrate that at the two concentrations measured, the molar absorptivity for each photoinitiator tested did not change significantly, indicating adherence to Beer's law. The definition of the photoinitiator systems within the invention clearly includes all the photoinitiators shown in the spectra, and excludes photoinitiators of comparative photoinitiator spectra 1-3 (Tables II, IV, and VII) 2,2-dimethyl-1,2-diphenyl ethanone (known under the trade designation Irgacure 651) and 2,2-dimethyl-2-hydroxy-1-phenyl-ethanone (known under the trade designation Darocur 1173. Examples 1-11 and Reference Examples R1-R8 The cure speed of various photoinitiator systems was determined by incorporating the photoinitiator system into a slurry consisting of a 70:30 mixture of 40 micrometer white aluminum oxide (available from Micro Abrasive Corp., Westfield, MA) and a photocurable resin system. The resin system consisted of APC (0.5 parts, a hydrolyzed form of 3-(trimethyloxysilyl)-propyl methacrylate available from Union Carbide Corp., Danbury, CT ) and 29.5 parts of a mixture consisting of 50 parts trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA, available from Sartomer Co., Exton, PA ), 50 parts of tris-(2-acrylolethyl) isocyanurate (TATHEIC, also available from Sartomer Co.) and 1-2.5 parts of the photoinitiator system indicated in Table 1. The slurries were tapped into 4 mm diameter quartz tubes, the tubes taped to a platen and the platens run under a light source at speeds from about 3 m/minute (10 feet/minute) to about 54 m/minute (175 feet/minute) at a distance of 5.1 cm (2 inches) from the light source. Light sources used in this study were 25.4 cm (10 inch), 600 watt/2.54 cm light bulbs with the designations "H", "V", "D", and "Q", available from Fusion Systems, Corp, Rockville, MD. The quartz tubes were broken open after each exposure and the slurry probed with a paper clip to determine if it had cured. Table 2 reports the light sources and the maximum speed at which the abrasive slurry was just cured using the various bulbs. (It should be noted that the 4 mm diameter tube used represents a thickness which is much greater than that typically used or necessary to produce a useable abrasive.) Comparative Examples C1-C31 The procedure of Examples 1-11 and Reference Examples R1-R8 was repeated except that a number of conventional photoinitiator systems were substituted for the photoinitiator systems of the present invention. Table 3 reports the various compositions that were tested and Table 4 reports the maximum cure speeds for these compositions. Among Examples 1-11 and Reference Example R1-R8, those employing the photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 369" (Examples R1, R3, R4, R6, and R8 were particularly effective in achieving through cure at higher webs speeds (38 m/minute or greater) with the "V" bulb. Photoinitiator systems comprising isopropylxanthone (ITX) and Irgacure 369 (Examples R2, R5, and R7) exhibited through cure only at decreased webs speeds with the "V" bulbs compared with initiator systems having no ITX present, although reasonable web speeds were achieved when curing with "Q" bulbs. Reference Examples R9-R15 Abrasive articles were prepared using the composition of Example R1. The slurry was extruded onto a nickel production tool having an asymmetric square pyramidal pattern using a vacuum coater die with the process described in Examples 15-16 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,917 (Pieper et al.). The pattern of the production tool had the edges of the bases of the pyramids, each 0.89 mm in length, abutted against one another. The apex of the pyramid was 0.53 mm above the plane of the base and was offset from a normal position perpendicular to the intersection of two lines bisecting opposite corners of the pyramid base to a position such that each face of the pyramid had different dimensions and made different angles with the base of the pyramid. The face angles with the base were 7.9°, 56.8°, 30.9°, and 46.9°. Immediately after extruding the slurry onto the production tool, with or without a vacuum applied to the vacuum die coater, a clear poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) film 127 micrometers thick (5 mils) which had been coated on one surface with an ethylene acrylic acid copolymer primer known under the trade designation "Primacor 3330", available from Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI was pressed against the production tool (primed side to slurry) and the resulting construction cured by exposure to two 300 watt/2.54 "H" bulbs in a nitrogen inerted web processor for the indicated times. Cut performance of the abrasive articles, as measured in the robot grinding test described above, is reported in Table 5. Comparative Examples C32-C33 An abrasive article was prepared according to the procedure of Examples R9-R15, using the composition of Example R1, except that 2 parts of the photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 651" per 100 parts TATHEIC/TMPTA were used instead of 1 part photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 369" per 100 parts TATHEIC/TMPTA. Cut performance of the abrasive articles, as measured in the robot grinding test as described above, is reported in Table 5. The most striking aspect of this performance evaluation was in the initial cut performance, where the cut dropped monotonically from 8.0 to 6.3 gms. as the web cure speed was raised from about 3.1 meters/minute to 9.1 meters/minute for the abrasive articles of the present invention as compared to the cut of comparative abrasive articles which decreased from 6.5 gms. when cured at 4.6 meters per minute to only 1.4 gms. when cured at 7.3 meters per minute. Reference Examples R16-R18 Abrasive articles were prepared from the basic slurry composition of Examples R9-R15 except that a portion of the 40 micrometer white aluminum oxide was replaced by an amorphous silica filler (known under the trade designation "OX-50", available from Degussa Corp., Ridgefield Park, NJ) and/or cryolite (a grinding aid, available from Washington Mills, North Grafton, MA) as indicated in Table 6. The abrasive articles were prepared by pouring a bead of the slurry on a flat production tool having the same pattern as the production tool used in Examples R9-R15 placing the primed face of a piece of a PET film 127 micrometers (5 mils) thick (same film as used in Examples R9-R15) against the production tool, and pushing against the back side of the PET film with a plastic blade to spread the slurry over the tool while forcing entrapped air bubbles out of the laminate construction. The thus formed sandwich constructions were taped to metal platens with the PET film facing upward, the pattern run through a nitrogen inerted web processor equipped with a 600 watt/2.54 cm "V" bulb at a distance of 5.1 cm (2 inches) from the light source and at the web speeds indicated in Table 6. Abrasive performance of the articles was characterized using the previously described slide action disk test (Test Procedure III) and the performance data for the articles is presented in Table 6. Comparative Examples C34-C36 Abrasive articles were prepared according to the procedure of Examples R16-R18 except that in the slurries of Comparative Examples C32-C33, a portion of the 40 micrometer white aluminum oxide was replaced by an amorphous silica filler known under the trade designation "OX-50" (Degussa Corp., Ridgefield Park, NJ, having average particle size of 40 millimicrometers, surface area of 50 m 2 /g) and/or cryolite, a grinding aid, as indicated in Table 6. Abrasive performance of the articles was characterized using the previously described slide action disk test. The performance data for the articles is presented in Table 6. Slurry Compositions and Abrasive Article Performance Data Example R16 R17 R18 C34 C35 C36 % OX-50 0 0 1.0 0 0 1.0 % cryolite 0 0 5.0 0 0 5.0 Web Speed (m/min) 3.1 9.1 3.1 3.1 9.1 3.1 Initial Cut 3.03 2.75 3.18 2.60 2.10 2.75 Final Cut 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.75 0.40 0.67 Total Cut 9.03 10.35 8.50 5.73 5.33 7.73 Time(minutes) 2.38 3.00 2.25 1.75 2.00 2.17 Abrasive articles prepared from the compositions of the present invention gave higher initial and total cuts than abrasive articles having the same basic composition but utilizing a different photoinitiator. Reference Examples R19 and R20 A slurry was prepared by combining a mixture consisting of 32 grams of a mixture consisting of a mixture of TATHEIC/TMPTA/Irgacure 369 (50/50/2), 40.98 grams of a mixture consisting of 100 parts tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate (available from Sartomer, Co.) and 2 parts 2-benzyl-2-N,N-dimethylamino-1-(4-morpholinophenyl)-butan-1-one ("Irgacure 369"), and 170 grams of a mixture consisting of 144.5 grams white aluminum oxide ("WA 2000", available from Fujimi Corp., Elmhurst, IL)/23.5 grams clay ("Peerless #4", available from R.T. Vanderbilt Co., Inc., Norwalk, CT )/ 2.0 grams 3-methylacryloylpropyltrimethoxysilane (known under the trade designation "A-174", available from Union Carbide Corp.,Danbury, CT) and mixing until a uniform mixture was obtained. An abrasive article was prepared from this slurry according to the procedure of U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,917 (Pieper et al.). The nickel production tool had an asymmetric triangular pyramidal pattern with two of the base edges being about 128.5 micrometers in length and the other edge being about 143 micrometers in length, with the base edges being abutted against one another. The height of the pyramid was about 63.5 micrometers. The PET film used in the construction was approximately 130 micrometers thick and had one face primed with an approximately 20 micrometer thick ethylene acrylic acid copolymer primer. A sandwich construction was prepared by introducing a bead of the adhesive slurry on the production tool, placing the PET film over the abrasive slurry, primed face toward the tool, and using a plastic blade to push the abrasive slurry over the tool such that the structured pattern of the tool was wet out and filled by the slurry. The thus formed sandwich construction was taped to a metal pattern with the PET film facing upward, the pattern passed through a web processor twice to produce the abrasive article. The web processor was equipped with a 600 watt/2.54 cm "V" bulb (Example 30) or a 600 watt/2.54 cm "D" bulb (Example 31), the web was 5.1 cm (2 inches) from the light source and the web speed was about 60 meters per minute. Abrasive performance of the articles was characterized using the previously described Schiefer Cut test and the performance data for the articles is presented in Table 7. Cut data is the average of two discs. Examples 12 and 13 The procedure of Examples R19 and R20 was followed except that the slurry was prepared by combining a mixture consisting of 32 grams of a mixture consisting of a mixture of 50 parts TATHEIC, 50 parts TMPTA, and 2 parts of the photoinitiator 2-methyl-1-[4-(methylthio)phenyl]-2-morpholinopropan-1-one (known under the trade designation "Irgacure 907"), 40.98 grams of a mixture consisting of 100 parts tetrahydrofurfuryl (THF) acrylate and 2 parts of the photoinitiator "Irgacure 907" and 170 grams of a mixture consisting of 144.5 grams white aluminum oxide "WA 2000", 23.5 grams clay ("Peerless #4) and 2.0 parts γ-methylacryloylpropyltrimethoxysilane coupling agent known under the trade designation "A-174" (Union Carbide) and mixing until a uniform mixture was obtained. Example 12 was cured using a "V" bulb while Example 13 was cured using a "D" bulb. Cut performance data for the abrasive articles, which is the average of two discs, is reported in Table 7. Examples 14 and 15 The procedure of Examples R19 and R20 was followed except that the slurry was prepared by blending a mixture consisting of 32 grams of a mixture consisting of 50 parts TATHEIC, 50 parts TMPTA, and 3 parts photoinitiator system consisting of 2 parts photoinitiator known as "Irgacure 907" and 1 part ITX, 40.98 grams of a mixture consisting of 100 parts tetrahydrofurfuryl (THF) acrylate and 3 parts photoinitiator system consisting of 2 parts photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 907" and 1 part ITX, and 170 grams of a mixture consisting of 144.5 grams white aluminum oxide "WA 2000", 23.5 grams clay ("Peerless #4) and 2.0 parts γ-methylacryloylpropyltrimethoxysilane coupling agent known under the trade designation "A-174" (Union Carbide) and mixing until a uniform mixture was obtained. Example 14 was cured using a "V" bulb while Example 15 was cured using a "D" bulb. Cut performance data for the abrasive articles, which was the average of two discs, is reported in Table 7. Comparative Examples C37-C38 The procedure of Examples R19 and R20 was followed except that the slurry was prepared by combining a mixture consisting of 32 grams of a mixture consisting of a mixture of 50 parts TATHEIC, 50 parts TMPTA, and 2 parts of the photoinitiator 2,2-dimethyl-1,2-diphenyl ethanone (known under the trade designation "Irgacure 651"), 40.98 grams of a mixture consisting of 100 parts tetrahydrofurfuryl (THF) acrylate and 2 parts photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 651"), and 170 grams of a mixture consisting of 144.5 grams white aluminum oxide "WA 2000", 23.5 grams clay ("Peerless #4) and 2.0 parts γ-methylacryloylpropyltrimethoxysilane coupling agent known under the trade designation "A-174" (Union Carbide) with mixing until a uniform mixture was obtained. Comparative Example C37 was cured using a "V" bulb while Comparative Example C38 was cured using a "D" bulb. Cut performance data using the Schiefer Cut Test for the abrasive articles, which was the average of two discs, is reported in Table 7. Schiefer Cut Test Data Example Photoinitiator Bulb Cut (gms) R19 Irgacure 369 "V" 0.382 ± 0.023 R20 Irgacure 369 "D" 0.400 ± 0.001 32 Irgacure 907 "V" 0.218 ± 0.017 33 Irgacure 907 "D" 0.304 ± 0.001 34 Irgacure 907/ITX "V" 0.409 ± 0.003 35 Irgacure 907/ITX "D" 0.471 ± 0.022 C37 Irgacure 651 "V" Slurry adhered to tool C38 Irgacure 651 "D" Slurry adhered to tool The data in Table 7 illustrates that photoinitiator systems of the invention (Examples R19, R20 and Examples 12-15) allow at least enough cure so that the film backing/abrasive composite may be removed from the production tool, whereas the photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 651" (Comparative Examples 37 and 38) does not allow cure to proceed well enough to allow this separation. The optimal combination of photoinitiator system and bulb type is the system comprising the photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 907" combined with ITX, using the "D" bulbs. The following examples demonstrate the effect of different lamps, cure speeds, polymeric colorants and photoinitiator systems on the cure level of the binder and the adhesion of the binder to the backing. Comparative Examples C39a-C39e Comparative Example C39a consisted of a slurry of 40 micrometer white aluminum oxide (69 parts), amorphous silica known under the trade designation "OX-50" (1 part), coupling agent known under the trade designation "A-174" (1 part), resin (29 parts of a blend consisting of 50 parts TATHEIC, 50 parts TMPTA, and 1 part photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Darocur 1173". This coatable composition was coated according to the procedure of Examples R19-R20 except that a polypropylene production tool having an asymmetric triangular pyramidal pattern, 0.53mm in height, having two of the base edges being about 1.06mm in length and the other edge being 1.18mm in length, with the base edges abutted against one another, was used. Coating and curing conditions were generally the same as those used in Examples 12 and R19 and R20 with the exception that light sources and cure speeds were varied as described below. Comparative Example C39b was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C39a except that 0.3 part of a blue polymeric colotant available from Milliken Corp., Spartanburg, SC, known under the trade designation "Reactint Blue X 17AB" was added to the slurry. Comparative Example (C39c) was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C39a except that 0.3 part of a yellow polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Yellow X15", available from Milliken Corp., was added to the slurry. Comparative Example C39d was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C39a except that 0.3 part of a red polymeric colorant, available from Milliken Corp. under the trade designation "Reactint Red X52" was added to the slurry. Comparative Example C39e was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C30a except that 0.3 part of an orange polymeric colourant, available from Milliken Corp. under the trade designation "Reactint orange X38", was added to the slurry. Comparative Examples C40a-C40e Comparative Example C40a was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C39a except that the resin was a blend consisting of 50 parts TATHEIC, 50 parts TMPTA, and 1 part photoinitiator known under trade designation "Irgacure 651". Comparative Example C40b was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C40a except that 0.3 part of the blue polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Blue X17AB" was added to the slurry. Comparative Example C40c was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C40a except that 0.3 part of the yellow polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Yellow X15" was added to the slurry. Comparative Example C40d was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C40a except that 0.3 part of the red polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Red X52" was added to the slurry. Comparative Example C40e was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C40a except that 0.3 part of the orange polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Orange X38" was added to the slurry. Examples 16a-16e Example 16a was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C39a except that the resin was a blend consisting of 50 parts TATHEIC, 50 parts TKPTA, 1.0 part of the photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 907", and 0.5 part ITX. Example 16b was prepared according to the procedure of Example 16a except that 0.3 part of a blue polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Blue X17AB" was added to the slurry. Example 16c was prepared according to the procedure of Example 16a except that 0.3 part of the yellow polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Yellow X15" was added to the slurry. Example 16d was prepared according to the procedure of Example 16a except that 0.3 part of the red polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Red X52" was added to the slurry. Example 16e was prepared according to the procedure of Example 16a except that 0.3 part of the orange polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Orange X38" was added to the slurry. Examples 17a-17e Example 17a was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C39a except that the resin was a blend consisting of 50 parts TATHEIC, 50 parts TMPTA, and 1 part photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 4265". Example 17b was prepared according to the procedure of Example 17a except that 0.3 part of a blue polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Blue X17AB" was added to the slurry. Example 17c was prepared according to the procedure of Example 17a except that 0.3 part of the yellow polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Yellow X15" was added to the slurry. Example 17d was prepared according to the procedure of Example 17a except that 0.3 part of the red polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Red X52" was added to the slurry. Example 17e was prepared according to the procedure of Example 17a except that 0.3 part of the orange polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Orange X38" was added to the slurry. Reference Examples R21a-R21e Example R21a was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C39a except that the resin was a blend consisting of 50 parts TATHEIC, 50 parts TMPTA, and 1 part photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 369". Example R21b was prepared according to the procedure of Example R21a except that 0.3 part of a blue polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Blue X17AB" was added to the slurry Example R21c was prepared according to the procedure of Example R21a except that 0.3 part of the yellow polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Yellow X15" was added to the slurry. Example R21d was prepared according to the procedure of Example R21a except that 0.3 part of the red polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Red X52" was added to the slurry. Example R21e was prepared according to the procedure of Example R21a except that 0.3 part of the orange polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint orange X38" was added to the slurry. Examples 18a-18e Example 18a was prepared according to the procedure of Comparative Example C39a except that the resin was a blend consisting of 50 parts TATHEIC, 50 parts TMPTA, and 1 part diphenyl 2,4,6-trimethyl benzoylphosphine oxide (TPO). Example 18b was prepared according to the procedure of Example 18a except that 0.3 part of a blue polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Blue X17AB" was added to the slurry. Example 18c was prepared according to the procedure of Example 18a except that 0.3 part of the yellow polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Yellow X15" was added to the slurry. Example 18d was prepared according to the procedure of Example 18a except that 0.3 part of the red polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint Red X52" was added to the slurry. Example 18e was prepared according to the procedure of Example 18a except that 0.3 part of the orange polymeric colorant known under the trade designation "Reactint orange X38" was added to the slurry. The binder precursors were cured by passing the tool/slurry/backing laminate under nine cure conditions, using a 600 watt/2.54cm "V" bulb, a 600 watt/2.54cm "H" bulb, or a 600 watt/2.54cm "D" bulb and web speeds of 15.2 m/min (50 ft/min), 30.5 m/min (100 ft/min), or 61 m/min (200 ft/min). All slurries were initially cured at a web speed of 15.2 m/min and if the cure or adhesion value for that cure speed was judged to have the lowest value of the rating scales described below, subsequent cures at higher web speeds were not run. Subsequent to being passed under the light source, the cure of each sample was qualitatively determined by rubbing the cured slurry with a gloved finger or a tongue depressor and noting if any smearing occurred. The cure was assigned a value from 1 to 3, where a value of 1 indicated significant smearing or a poor cure, a value of 2 indicated some smearing or an intermediate cure and a value of 3 indicated no smearing or a good cure. Similarly, the adhesion of the binder to the backing was qualitatively determined by initially observing the release of the composite from the production tool and then the subsequent adhesion of the cured slurry to the backing as the composite structure was flexed. The adhesion was assigned a value from 1 to 5, where a value of 1 indicated that a major portion of the "cured slurry" adhered to the production tool, a value of 2 indicated that there were some areas where the "cured slurry" adhered to the production tool, a value of 3 indicated no adhesion to the production tool but poor adhesion to the backing as evidenced by large areas of the "cured slurry" flaking off the backing during flexing, a value of 4 indicated no adhesion to the production tool and small areas of the "cured slurry" flaking off the backing on flexing, and a value of 5 indicated no adhesion to the production tool and no loss of the "cured slurry" on flexing. An incomplete analysis of variance, reflecting that not all samples were cured at all web speeds, using a generalized linear model, looking only at main effects and two-way interactions with the assumption that higher order (>3) interactions were zero, was carried out on the collected data, the results of which are reported in Tables 11-14 below (average of six samples). The data in Tables 11-14 indicated the following trends: 1) The cured slurries of Examples 16, 17, 18 and R21 showed better adhesion to the backing than the cured slurries of Comparative Examples C39-C40 under all cure conditions; 2) Considering the adhesion of slurries cured with the "V" bulb, the adhesion of the cured slurries of Examples 16-18 and R21 were much higher than the adhesion of the cured slurries of Comparative Examples C39-C40. 3) The cured slurries of Examples 16-18 and R21 showed better "cure" than the cured slurries of Comparative Examples C39-C40 under all cure conditions; and 4) Considering the "cure" of slurries cured with the "V" bulb, the "cure" of Examples 16-18 and R21 were much higher than the "cure" of Comparative Examples C39-C40. Reference Examples 22-25 and Comparative Example C41 These examples demonstrated the ability to coat and cure compositions within the invention having different mineral types (colors) therein, and demonstrated the cut performance of the articles. Examples R22-R25, respectively, utilized coatable compositions consisting of 20.7 kilograms (kg) abrasive mineral (type as indicated in Table 15), 0.3 kg amorphous silica known under the trade designation "OX-50", 0.3 kg coupling agent known under the trade designation "A-174", and 8.7 kg resin (70 parts TMPTA, 30 parts TATHEIC, 1 part photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 369"). These coatable compositions were coated onto a 7 mil (0.179mm) polypropylene diamond grade production tool having an asymmetric triangular pyramidal pattern, 0.53mm in height, having two of the base edges being about 1.06mm in length and the other edge being 1.18mm in length, with the base edges abutted against one another. The coatable compositions were mixed with a high shear mixer and knife coated onto the polypropylene tooling. The backing used for each of Examples R22-R25 and Comparative Example C41 was a rayon cloth backing treated with a phenolic/latex presize resin. The tooling mandrel (location where the product was cured and transferred to the cloth backing) was heated to 45°C. One 600 watt/2.54 cm "V" Fusion Systems lamp was used in each case to cure the compositions, at a run speed of 50-75 feet per minute. The products were then post cured at 112°C for 14 hours to more completely cure the phenolic presize. The type of abrasive used in each example and the cut data are tabulated in Table 15. Test Procedure II was utilized for grinding, except that for 1018 stainless steel and 4150 tool steel the belt was run at 1750 RPM, and for 304 stainless steel the belt was run at 1500 RPM, all with a 65 Shore A durometer rubber contact wheel. For grinding brass the belts were run at 1500 RPM against at 45 Shore A durometer rubber contact wheel, and the brass was run only for 10 minutes, not to an endpoint. The initial reading was taken after 30 seconds for all of Examples R22-R25 and Comparative Example C41 (rather than after 1 minute), and the endpoint was when the cut for the test belt was only 1/3 that of the initial cut of the belt of Comparative Example C41, or upon burning of the belt, for all workpieces except brass. From the data in Table 15 it can be seen that improvement in cut performance was achieved on different metal substrates when using colored minerals compared with white aluminum oxide, which allows easy cure of addition polymerizable resins with UV radiation in comparison to utilization of colored minerals. Reference Example R26 and Comparative Example C42 This set of examples illustrated the benefit of using green silicon carbide as the abrasive particle in compositions and articles of the invention. Example R26 and Comparative Example C42 utilized coatable compositions consisting of 3900 grams abrasive mineral (type as indicated in Table 16), 60 grams amorphous silica known under the trade designation "OX-50", 60 grams coupling agent known under the trade designation "A-174", and 1980 grams resin (70 parts TMPTA, 30 parts TATHEIC, 1 part photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 369"). These coatable compositions were coated onto a 14 mil (0.358mm) polypropylene variable pitch production tool having an asymmetric triangular pyramidal pattern, 0.53mm in height, having two of the base edges being about 1.06mm in length and the other edge being 1.18mm in length, with the base edges abutted against one another. The coatable compositions were mixed with a high shear mixer and knife coated onto the polypropylene tooling. The backing used for each of Examples R26 and Comparative Example C42 was a rayon cloth backing treated with a phenolic/latex presize resin. The tooling mandrel (location where the product was cured and transferred to the cloth backing) was heated to 45°C. Two 600 watt/2.54 cm "V" Fusion Systems lamps were used in each case to cure the compositions, at a run speed of 50 feet per minute. The products were then post cured at 112°C for 14 hours to more completely cure the phenolic presize. The type of abrasive used in each example and the cut data are tabulated in Table 16. Test Procedure II was utilized for grinding, except that titanium workpieces were used, the serated rubber contact wheel had a 65 Shore A durometer, and the belts were run at 825 RPM. The initial reading was taken after 30 seconds for both Example R26 and Comparative Example C42 (rather than after 1 minute), and the endpoint for total cut reading for Example R26 was when the cut for the test belt was only 1/3 that of the initial cut of the belt of Comparative Example C42. The type of abrasive used in each example and the cut data are tabulated in Table 16. From the data in Table 16 it can be seen that improvement in cut performance on a very hard metal (titanium) was achieved when using green silicon carbide as the abrasive mineral compared with a standard make/size coated abrasive kown under the trade designation "3M-ite", grade 311E, employing heat treated aluminum oxide (brown). Example Mineral Type Initial Cut (g) Total Cut (g) R26 P-400 GSC 0.85 8.9 C42 P-400 311E 0.9 6.6 Reference Example R27 This example was performed to illustrate the "depth of cure" achievable using photoinitiator systems consisting essentially of a compound which cleaves via α-cleavage and having molar absorptivity as described herein. Example R27 utilized a coatable composition consisting of 4080 grams abrasive mineral (P-120 grade heat treated aluminum oxide (brown) having 116 micrometer average particle size), 120 grams amorphous silica known under the trade designation "OX-50", 60 grams coupling agent known under the trade designation "A-174", 300 grams KBF 4 grinding aid, and 1440 grams resin (70 parts TMPTA, 30 parts TATHEIC, 1 part photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 369"). This coatable composition was coated onto a 28 mils (0.711mm) polypropylene production tool having a square base pyramidal pattern, 0.711mm in height, having two of the base edges being about 1.41mm in length and the other edge being 1.57mm in length, with the base edges abutted against one another. The coatable composition was mixed with a high shear mixer and knife coated into the polypropylene tooling. The backing used was 5 mils (0.127 mm) thick polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film which was primed on the side which receive the coatable composition with a coating 0.8 mil (0. 02mm) of ethylene acrylic acid copolymer to promote adhesion of the composition and resulting abrasive composite to the film. One 600 watt/2.54 cm "V" Fusion Systems lamp was used to cure the composition at a web speed of 100 ft/min (30.5 meters/min). Precisely shaped particles were generated having length dimension of 28 mils (0.716mm) by exposing the cured composite to a 20,000 Hz ultrasonic horn, thus separating the individual precisely shaped abrasive particles from the PET film. This example showed that thicknesses up to 28 mils (0.711mm) can be cured using photoinitiator systems including initiators such as "Irgacure 369" when employing dark colored abrasive particles. Comparative Examples C43-C48 These examples illustrated that use of photoinitiators systems not including a compound which cleaves via α-cleavage and having a molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution ranging from about 4 to about 400 liter/mole-cm in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers can not be used to produce preferred (i.e. thick) abrasive products. Comparative Examples C43-C48 utilized a coatable composition consisting of 70 grams abrasive mineral (P-300 grade heat treated aluminum oxide (gray) having average particle size of about 40 micrometers), 0.5 gram coupling agent known under the trade designation "A-174", and 29.5 grams resin (50 parts TMPTA, 50 parts TATHEIC, 2 parts photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 651"). Examples C43-C48 were generated by placing the coatable composition between two layers of PET film and setting a gap with a knife coater to generate either 7, 14 or 21 mil (0.178, 0.355 and 0.533mm, respectively) thickness of the composition. One 600 watt/2.54 cm "D" Fusion Systems lamp was used in each case to cure the composition. Two different web speeds were employed: 100 feet/min and 25 feet/min (30.5 and 7.63 meters.min, respectively), as detailed in Table 17. The data in Table 17 illustrate that the photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 651" did not allow for coatable compositions to be cured at high web speeds or at thicknesses that would make the most preferred abrasive articles. The only composition/thickness/web speed combination that cured was that of Comparative Example C48. It is preferred that web speeds be on the order of about 45-60 meter/min Comp. Example sample thickness (mm) web speed (meters/min) cure (yes/no) C43 0.533 30.5 no C44 0.355 7.63 no C45 0.178 7.63 yes C46 0.533 30.5 no C47 0.355 7.63 no C48 0.178 7.63 no Reference Examples R28-R29 and Comparative Example C49 These examples demonstrated the increased cut performance of structured abrasive articles on 304 stainless steel when going from 7 mil (0.179mm) thickness to 14 mil (0.358mm) thickness using dark abrasive minerals. Examples R28-R29 and Comparative Example C49 utilized coatable compositions consisting of 2940 grams abrasive mineral (type as indicated in Table 18), 60 grams amorphous silica known under the trade designation "OX-50", 60 grams coupling agent known under the trade designation "A-174", 1200 grams KBF 4 grinding aid, and 1740 grams resin (70 parts TMPTA, 30 parts TATHEIC, 1 part photoinitiator known under the trade designation "Irgacure 369"). These coatable compositions were coated onto 7 mil (0.179mm) or 14 mil (0.358mm) polypropylene production tools, the former having an asymmetric triangular pyramidal pattern, 0.53mm in height, having two of the base edges being about 1.06mm in length and the other edge being 1.18mm in length, with the base edges abutted against one another, and the latter being a variable pitch construction. The coatable compositions were mixed with a high shear mixer and knife coated onto the polypropylene tooling in each case. The backing used for each of Examples 59-60 and Comparative Example C59 was a rayon cloth backing treated with a phenolic/latex presize resin. The tooling mandrel (location where the product was cured and transferred to the cloth backing) was heated to 45°C. One 600 watt/2.54 cm "V" Fusion Systems lamp was used in each case to cure the compositions, at a run speed of 50 feet per minute. The products were then post cured at 112°C for 14 hours to more completely cure the phenolic presize. The type of abrasive used in each example and the cut data are tabulated in Table 18 for cutting 304 stainless steel. Test Procedure II was utilized for grinding, except that the belt was run at 1500 RPM and with a 65 Shore A durometer rubber contact wheel. The initial reading was taken after 30 seconds for all of Examples R28-R29 and Comparative Example C49 (rather than after 1 minute), and the endpoint for total cut was when the cut for the test belt was only 1/3 that of the initial cut of the belt of Comparative Example C49, or upon burning of the belt. Example No. Tool topography abrasive particles initial cut (g) total cut (g) R28 1 P-320 F7TX 9.7 135.4 C49 --- P-320 F7TX 6.25 68.9 R29 2 P-320 F7TX 10.3 110.9 The data in Table 18 for Examples R28 and R29 may be compared with the data for Comparative Examples C43-C48 regarding cure depth, while the data in Table 18 for Examples R28 and R29 may be compared with the data for Example C49 in terms of cutting performance. It can be seen that a major improvement in cure depth was achieved utilizing a photoinitiator system which included at least one compound having molar absorptivity ranging from about 4 to about 400 in dilute methanol solution. This in turn translated into better cut performance on 304 stainless steel when using the higher topography abrasive (Example R28 used 14 mil topography while Example R29 utilized 7 mil topography), and both Examples R28 and R29 were better performing than the abrasive of Comparative Example C49. Reference Example R30 The coatable composition used in this example was similar to that used in Example R27 with the following changes: 4320 grams of garnet (reddish brown) was used as the abrasive particle, rather than 4080 grams of heat treated aluminum oxide (brown); 1680 grams of resin was employed, rather than 1440 grams; and no KBF 4 grinding aid was used. The coatable composition was cured and released from the tooling transferring to the PET film, after which the particles were separated from the film with an ultrasonic horn as explained in Example R27. The data of the invention illustrated that the inventive abrasive articles and methods of making same are useful, novel, and nonobvious since increased web speeds and dark minerals may be used in relatively thick constructions (up to 28 mils or about 0.711mm). Thus, the more efficacious dark minerals may be employed whereas before only white aluminum oxide could be used.

Claims: A coatable composition suitable for use in producing abrasive articles, the coatable composition comprising abrasive particles and a photoinitiator system dispersed in a free radically polymerizable composition, wherein said photoinitiator system includes a compound which cleaves via α-cleavage, said compound having a molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution ranging from about 4 to about 400 liter/mole-cm in at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 nanometers to about 500 nanometers with the proviso that said compound is not 2-benzyl-2-N,N-dimethylamino-1-(4-morpholinophenyl)-1-butanone. A coatable composition in accordance with claim 1 wherein said abrasive particles are nonwhite and nontransparent. A coatable composition in accordance with claim 1 or 2 wherein said compound is an α-amino acetophenone. A coatable composition in accordance with any of claims 1 to 3 wherein said photoinitiator system includes a photosensitizer. A coatable composition in accordance with any of claims 1 to 4 wherein said photoinitiator system further includes a photoinitiator selected from the group consisting of: a) non-α-cleavage photoinitiators; b) bimolecular photoinitiators; c) unimolecular α-cleavage photoinitiators having a molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution less than about 4 liter/mole-cm; and d) unimolecular α-cleavage photoinitiators having a molar absorptivity in dilute methanol solution greater than about 400 liter/mole-cm. A coatable composition in accordance with any of claims 1 to 5 wherein said free radically polymerizable composition comprises materials having at least one ethylenically unsaturated group selected from the group consisting of aminoplast resins having at least one pendant organic radical which is ethylenically unsaturated, acrylated isocyanurate resins, acrylated urethane resins, acrylated epoxy resins, N-vinylpyrrolidone, hexanediol diacrylate, triethylene glycol diacrylate, trimethylol propane triacrylate, tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate, and pentaerythritol triacrylate. A coatable composition in accordance with any of claims 1 to 6 wherein said photoinitiator system comprises from about 0.1 to about 10 weight percent, said abrasive particles comprise from about 50 to about 85 weight percent, and said addition polymerizable resin comprises from about 10 to about 45 weight percent, all weight percentages based on total dry weight of said coatable composition. A method of making a coated abrasive article comprising the steps of: (a) coating a backing material with the coatable composition according to any of claims 1 to 7; (b) subjecting the coated backing of step (a) to radiation conditions sufficient to cure the free radically polymerizable resin, wherein the radiation includes at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from 395 to 500 nanometers. A method of making a coated abrasive article comprising a plurality of precisely shaped abrasive composites having at least one shape, the method comprising the steps of 1) coating the coatable composition according to any one of claims 1 to 7 onto a production tool having a three dimensional pattern; 2) contacting a substrate having at least one major surface with said coatable composition so that said coatable composition wets said at least one major surface of the substrate, thus forming a first intermediate article; 3) exposing the coatable composition to at least some portion of the UV/visible spectrum ranging from about 395 to about 500 nanometers sufficient to at least partially cure the free radically polymerizable resin to form a second intermediate article; and 4) removing the second intermediate article from the production tool, yielding an abrasive article. The method in accordance with claim 9 wherein said at least one shape is a pyramid.

Inventors: CULLER SCOTT R, HIBBARD LOUIS D, KLUN THOMAS P, SPURGEON KATHRYN M, CULLER, SCOTT R., HIBBARD, LOUIS D., KLUN, THOMAS P., SPURGEON, KATHRYN M., CULLER, SCOTT R., C/O MINNESOTA MINING AND, HIBBARD, LOUIS D., C/O MINNESOTA MINING AND, KLUN, THOMAS P., C/O MINNESOTA MINING AND, SPURGEON, KATHRYN M., C/O MINNESOTA MINING AND
Applicants: MINNESOTA MINING & MFG, MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Application year: 1994
Main classification: B24D3
IPC codes: C09K3, C09D4, B24D11, B24D3