Phacoemulsification probe circuit with switch drive means

Abstract: A drive for a phacoemulsification probe (13) includes a drive circuit (15) for supplying electrical power to the probe (13), circuitry (29) for sensing the electrical power supplied by the drive circuit (15) to the probe (13) and for supplying electrical signals indicative of the magnitude of the electrical power supplied. A manually operable input device (21) provides a signal indicative of the transducer power level desired by the user of the probe (13). A control circuit is responsive to the signal indicative of the desired transducer power level and to the signals indicative of the magnitude of the supplied electrical power for providing control signals to the drive circuit (15) to control the power applied in an efficient manner. The drive circuit (15) includes a totem-pole switch (31), responsive to at least one of the control signals, to apply power in a square-wave waveform, and a switching regulator (27) for supplying a supply voltage to the totem-pole switch (31). The totem-pole switch (31) has circuitry associated therewith which is responsive to one of the control signals to initially vary the frequency of the square-wave waveform. The regulator (27) is responsive to a second control signal (A) from the control circuit to vary the voltage supplied by the regulator (27) to the totem-pole switch (31) to control the amplitude of the square-wave waveform. The switching nature of this system substantially minimizes the power consumption of the drive circuit (15) as compared with conventional techniques.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to the field of phacoemulsification, and more particularly to drive circuits for phacoemulsification probes. The use of ultrasonic handpieces or probes for the removal of cataracts in the human eye is well known. Typically, this procedure, called phacoemulsification, uses ultrasonic probes for rupturing cataracts in the eye, combined with aspiration of the resulting debris. Ultrasonic phacoemulsification probes conventionally include a piezoelectric crystal(s) affixed to a probe body. The crystal is driven by an electric power source and converts the electric power to ultrasonic power which is applied by the probe to the cataract. The amount of power applied by the probe is a function of the frequency and amplitude of the driving electrical waveform and is typically under control of the surgeon using the probe. It is known that the frequency of the applied electrical waveform should be adjusted to the resonant frequency of the probe for efficient power conversion. Prior art drive circuits for phacoemulsification probes function adequately, but they could be improved. For example, prior art drive circuits have a level of power consumption that is higher than desirable. This high level of power consumption is not only inefficient, it results in other deficiencies. Higher power consumption generates more heat, requiring the use of larger heat sinks than would be desirable, increasing the device's total weight and size, and, possibly, requiring additional cooling fans or other means of dissipating the excess heat. The prior art discloses a variety of phacoemulsification probe systems such as that disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,587,958. U.S. Patent No. 4,587,958 discloses a phacoemuisification probe system having an ultrasonic handpiece including a transducer for converting electrical power to ultrasonic power for application to the patient, drive circuit means for supplying electrical power to the ultrasonic handpiece transducer, means for sensing the electrical power supplied by the drive circuit means to the ultrasonic handpiece transducer and for supplying electrical signals indicative of the magnitude of said electrical power supplied by the drive circuit means, manually operable input means for providing a signal indicative of the transducer power level desired by the user of the phacoemulsification probe system, and control circuit means responsive to the signal indicative of the desired transducer power level and to the signals indicative of the magnitude of the supplied electrical power for providing control signals to the drive circuit means to control the power applied and to control the efficiency of the application of power. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Among the various objects and features of the present invention may be noted the provision of a phacoemulsification probe drive circuit with improved efficiency. A second object is the provision of such a probe drive circuit with reduced size and weight. A third object is the provision of such a probe drive circuit with reduced size and weight. Other objects and features will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter. Briefly, a phacoemulsification probe system of the present invention includes the features recited in claim 1. Brief Description of the Drawings : Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a phacoemulsification probe system (Reference system); Fig. 2 is a diagram illustrating the voltage levels involved in the system of Fig. 1; Fig. 3 is a block diagram of the phacoemulsification probe system of the present invention; Fig. 3A is a schematic of a portion of the circuitry of Fig. 3; and Fig. 4 is a diagram illustrating the square-wave output of a portion of the drive circuit of the system of Fig. 3. Similar reference characters indicate similar parts throughout the several views of the drawings. Description of the Reference System (Fig. 1; not according to the invention) and Preferred Embodiment (Fig.3): Turning to the drawings, a phacoemulsification probe system 11 of the present invention includes an ultrasonic handpiece or probe 13 having a distal end of a size suitable for insertion into a patient's eye for emulsifying cataracts and the like. For purposes of this invention, handpiece 13 may be of any conventional piezoelectric design and includes a conventional transducer for converting electrical power to ultrasonic power for application to the patient (not shown). A drive circuit 15 is provided for supplying electrical power to the transducer of ultrasonic handpiece 13. The voltage (labelled VAPL on Fig. 1) and current (labelled IAPL) actually supplied by the drive circuit is sensed by conventional voltage and current sensing circuitry 17 and electrical signals representing the applied voltage VAPL and applied current are supplied from the sensing circuitry to a control computer 19. Control computer 19 may be a conventional microprocessor suitably programmed to perform the functions described herein. In addition to inputs VAPL and IAPL, computer 19 receives an input (labelled F) from a manually operable input device 21. Input device 21 is a conventional footpedal by means of which the surgeon signals the computer to increase or decrease the output power of probe 13. Control computer 19 has three output signals (labelled A and "freq") which are provided to control drive circuit 15. It is known in the art to provide control signals A and "freq" to provide the output power at the desired level and at the resonant frequency of the probe. Control signals A and "freq" from the control computer are provided to a conventional voltage controlled oscillator 23 whose output is supplied to a class B amplifier 25. Power for the class B amplifier is obtained from a switching regulator 27, and the output of amplifier 25 is supplied to drive a transformer 29. The output of transformer 29 is applied to probe 13 and that same output is sensed by sensing circuit 17 as described above. Switching regulator 27 provides a supply voltage (labelled VADJ) to amplifier 25 which is a function of the other control signal from computer 19, namely control signal V in the reference system of Fig. 1, which is not part of the present invention. In general control signal V is used to control the efficiency of the application of power, specifically to substantially minimize the amplifier's power consumption, while control signal A is used to control the level of power applied to the probe. Operation of system 11 is as follows: During use of system 11 (after initial adjustment of control signal "freq" to find the resonant frequency of probe 13), control computer 19 receives signal F from footpedal 21, which signal represents the power level the user desires to be applied to probe 13. Computer 19 in response adjusts the amplitude control signal A to voltage controlled oscillator 23 to approximately supply the desired power level to the probe. The actual applied voltage and current VAPL and IAPL are sensed and signals representing them are supplied to computer 19 to close the control loop between the drive circuit and computer 19. The computer uses this information concerning the actual applied power to adjust control signal A as necessary to deliver the desired power corresponding to input signal F to the probe. Although control of signal A results in the desired power being applied to the probe, it exerts no control over the efficiency of drive circuit 15. To control that efficiency, and thereby substantially minimize the power consumption, computer 19 further adjusts control signal V to switching regulator 27. The switching regulator (preferably a boost regulator, although other types of switching regulators could also be used) is provided with a fixed voltage (labelled VFIXED) which it regulates as commanded by control signal V. Adjustment of control signal V causes the supply voltage output VADJ of the switching regulator to change in a controlled manner. The value of supply voltage VADJ is determined as follows: Referring to Fig. 2, the voltage VB is the signal applied to transformer 29. That signal is a sine wave of amplitude VP. Thus, voltage VB has a peak to peak amplitude of 2*VP. Class B amplifier 25 works in such a way that VB = VADJ/2 + VP*sinwt. Computer 19 controls switching regulator 27 so that the supply voltage VADJ remains at the level VADJ = 2*VP + 2*VM, as VP varies in response to footpedal signal F. VM is the marginal voltage required by the class B amplifier so that the signal is properly passed without significant distortion. If VADJ were larger than this value (2*(VP + VM)), then excess power would be dissipated in amplifier 25. If VADJ were less than this value, then the signal would be distorted. Turning to Fig. 3, the present invention is similar to the Reference System of Fig. 1, but instead of a class B amplifier 25 it has a totem pole switch 31, followed by a shaping filter 33. In the same manner as the system of Fig. 1, the control computer 19 receives a signal F from the footpedal 21 representing the desired power level to be applied to the probe 13. The control computer then adjusts the amplitude signal A to the switching regulator 27 which controls the magnitude of the supply voltage Vs. The value of Vs in turn determines the amplitude of the square wave Vsq applied to shaping filter 33. The shaping filter (normally a band-pass filter) rejects the harmonics of the square wave (and any DC level) and passes only the fundamental frequency. Output Vsig is thus a sinusoidal signal which is applied to the transformer and sensing circuit 29. Circuit 29 senses the applied voltage and current to the probe, namely Vapl and Iapl. From these signals, the actual power applied to the probe is calculated by the control computer. This allows the control computer to close the control loop and control signal A to deliver the desired power commanded by signal F to the probe. It should again be understood that the frequency, controlled by signal "freq," is adjusted once at the beginning of the operation to find the resonant frequency of the probe, and then left constant thereafter. Changes in the desired power are made by changing control signal "A." Turning to Fig. 3A it can be seen that the output from VCO 23 is supplied to the switch control and driver portion 39 of totem-pole switch 31, which in turn open and close switches 41 and 43 to provide the square-wave output shown on the top line of Fig. 4. This square-wave is filtered by shaping filter 33 to provide the sinusoidal waveform Vsig shown on the bottom line of Fig. 4 to the transformer. It has been found that the system of the present invention provides greatly increased efficiencies over the prior art. For example, with a prior art system, the supply voltage Vs is fixed at some value which is large enough so that the maximum power can be delivered to the load with the largest load resistance. For comparison purposes, assume that all three systems (prior art, Fig. 1, and Fig. 3) are designed to deliver a maximum power of 20W to a load in the range of 2.2 ohm to 11.1 ohm. The prior art system must have a supply voltage of 48V in order to be able to deliver maximum power (20W) to the largest resistive load (11.1 ohm). For comparison, the power dissipated in the prior art system is calculated to vary from 8.9W at 11.1 ohm (68.7% efficiency) up to 45.1W at 2.2 ohm (30.7% efficiency). In contrast the system of Fig. 1 has a power dissipation identical to that of the prior art system at 11.1 ohm, but a power dissipation of only 13.6W (59.6% efficiency) at 2.2 ohms. This is almost double the efficiency of the prior art system at low resistance. Even at average load resistance (approximately 4 ohm), the system of Fig. 1 is approximately 20% more efficient than the prior art system. The system of Fig. 3 is even more efficient. The efficiency varies from about 95% to 99% as the load resistance varies from 2.2 to 11.1 ohms. This is a very significant improvement. The maximum dissipation that must be handled with the system of Fig. 3 is less than a watt. At this level of dissipation, in some applications it may be possible to eliminate a heat sink altogether. Although the efficiencies mentioned above are theoretical, in practice they can be closely approached, giving the system of Fig. 3 great practical advantages over the prior art. In addition, it should be noted that the efficiencies mentioned above relate to only the amplifier and not to any efficiencies resulting from the use of a switching regulator. It should be realized that the components described above are illustrative only. Any number of similar components could be used with the same invention. Numerous variations of the present constructions and methods may be used. The examples given herein are merely illustrative, and are not to be construed in a limiting sense.

Claims: A phacoemulsification probe system (11) having an ultrasonic handpiece (13) having a distal end of a size suitable for insertion into a patient's eye for emulsifying cataracts, said handpiece (13) including a transducer for converting electrical power to ultrasonic power for application to the patient; drive circuit means (23, 27, 31, 39, 29) for supplying electrical power to the ultrasonic handpiece transducer, means for sensing the electrical power (29) supplied by the drive circuit means (23, 27, 31, 39, 29) to the ultrasonic handpiece transducer and for supplying electrical signals (V APL , I APL ,) indicative of the magnitude of said electrical power supplied by the drive circuit means (23, 27, 31, 39, 29); manually operable input means (21) for providing a signal indicative of the transducer power level desired by the user of the phacoemulsification probe system (11); and control circuit means (19) responsive to the signal (F) indicative of the desired transducer power level and to the signals (V APL , I APL ) indicative of the magnitude of the supplied electrical power for providing control signals to the drive circuit means (23, 27, 31, 39, 29) to control the applied power, said drive circuit means (23, 27, 31, 39, 29) including switching means (31, 39) responsive to at least one of the control signals to apply power in a square-wave waveform (V SQ ) and regulator means (27) for supplying a supply voltage (V S ) to the switching means (31, 39), said switching means (31, 39) including means (23) responsive to said one of the control signals to initially vary the frequency of the square-wave waveform, said regulator means (27) being responsive to a second control signal (A) from the control circuit means (19) to vary the voltage (V S ) supplied by the regulator means (27) to the switching means (31, 39) to control the amplitude of the square-wave waveform, thereby controlling the power delivered to the probe (13), characterized in that the switching means (31, 39) includes an oscillator (23) directly responsive to said one of the control signals for initially setting the frequency of the square-wave waveform, said one of the control signals controlling the frequency of oscillation of the oscillator (23). The phacoemulsification probe system (11) as set forth in Claim 1 wherein the square-wave waveform (V SQ ) has approximately a fifty percent duty cycle. The phacoemulsification probe system (11) as set forth in Claim 1 or 2, wherein for a fixed frequency of the square-wave waveform, the control circuit (19) controls the regulator means (27) to supply a supply voltage (V S ) of a magnitude selected to provide the desired transducer power level to the transducer (13). The phacoemulsification probe system (11) as set forth in one of Claims 1 to 3, wherein the regulator means (27) is a switching regulator (27) whose output voltage (V S ) is controlled by the second control signal from the control circuit means (19). The phacoemulsification probe system (11) as set forth in one of Claims 1 to 4, wherein the output of the switching means (31,39) is connected to a shaping filter (33), the output (V SIG ) of the shaping filter (33) being connected to the input of a transformer (29), the output of the transformer (29) being connected to drive the ultrasonic handpiece transducer (13), said means for sensing (29) the electrical power supplied to the ultrasonic handpiece being connected to the transformer to sense said supplied electrical power. The phacoemulsification probe system (11) as set forth in one of Claims 1 to 5, wherein the switching means (31, 39) includes a totem-pole switch (31). The phacoemulsification probe system (11) as set forth in Claim 6 wherein the totem-pole switch (31) has substantially lower source impedance than class A, class B, and class AB amplifiers.

Inventors: KEPLEY KEVIN PAUL, KEPLEY, KEVIN PAUL
Applicants: AMERICAN CYANAMID CO, AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
Application year: 1993
Main classification: A61F9
IPC codes: A61F9, A61B17