METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SELECTING REMOTE STATIONS ACCORDING TO THEIR PRIORITIES

Abstract: A method for priority discrimination between a plurality of remote stations, the stations having varying characteristics related to the priority and including the steps of first transmitting a call to a plurality of the remote stations; calculating, at each of the stations, of a priority according to a predetermined protocol for the respective station; transmitting, by the stations, of a signal at a predetermined time and frequency, the time and frequency being indicative of the calculated priority, wherein more than one station may transmit at the same time and frequency.

Description: Method and Apparatus for Selecting Remote Stations According to Their Priori ti es FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates generally to a method and system for iteratively assigning respective discrete priorities to a plurality of participants in accordance with one or more selection criteria and targeting those participants, if any, having the highest priority during each iteration. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION It is a common requirement to target and possibly identify quickly one or several out of a plurality of participants according to specific selection criteria. For example, a warning system may be required to alert all people within a specified geographical area of an outbreak of fire or some other hazard. In such case, it is not, of course, necessary to identify each person but merely to target everybody at risk. On the other hand, it is frequently required to select one or more participants according to their priority based on specified selection criteria for the purpose of allocating a particular task to the participant or participants having the highest priority. In dispatching systems, for example, for dispatching a taxi or messenger to a customer at a specified location, it is desirable that a suitable (and preferably the most suitable) taxi or messenger be sent to a particular customer. Generally the nearest, unoccupied taxi which has sufficient accommodation should be dispatched to the customer. Furthermore, it is desirable that the allocation be accomplished in the minimum possible time. Typical existing dispatching systems include a central dispatch station having a transmitter and receiver and a transceiver in each of the participating vehicles for communicating with the central dispatch station. Typically, a voice request is transmitted by a dispatcher to each of the participating vehicles, and the dispatcher decides which of the vehicles is most suited to the task in hand based on the replies from the vehicles. Such a system would be capable of simple implementation if the selection criteria related to static variables only. Thus, if the only selection criterion were a taxi's current distance from the customer and each taxi were stationary, it would merely be necessary to extract the taxis' locations once, after which it would be simple to determine which taxi were nearest to the customer's location. However, in practice, the selection criteria relate to dynamic variables which, by definition, are changing constantly and therefore it is necessary continuously to update each taxi's distance from the customer's location (and/or other information required to choose a taxi for the given task) or at least to do so each time a taxi is to be dispatched. In typical prior art systems, this is done by providing the dispatcher with a periodically updated map that shows the respective location of each of the taxis. This updating is accomplished by the periodic transmission of a location message by each of the taxis via a communication channel. In order to ensure that the transmitted data can be received quickly and without corruption, the total spectrum width of the communication system must be very large. It should also be noted that, even in the specific case of a taxi or messenger service, distance from the customer location is by no means the only criterion according to which a task may be allocated. Thus, it may well be that the nearest messenger or taxi is already occupied and is therefore not available for performing the task. Alternatively, the nearest available taxi may not have sufficient room for carrying all the passengers to whom a taxi must be sent; or perhaps a particularly bulky load must be carried and the nearest, available taxi or messenger is inadequate for the task. Yet a further consideration is that it is often preferred to dispatch to a customer an idle taxi waiting at the taxi rank rather than go through the process of transmitting a voice message and awaiting responses from taxis in the field prior to allocating the task to one of them. In the event that several idle taxis are waiting at the taxi rank, or where several taxis are reasonably close to the customer, it is often preferable that the taxi which has been idle for the longest period of time be selected. Furthermore, it may not always be desirable to dispatch the nearest available taxi to a particular customer location if other customers, albeit further away, have made prior requests which have not yet been serviced. Even apart from some of the basic limitations of prior art systems described above, it is often desirable to target and possibly to identify participants according to several selection criteria. This is somewhat analogous to performing a database search by means of key words which can be combined according to the rules of Boolean or other logic systems. However, database records are generally static and are stored at a single location. In contrast to this, the participants subject of the invention are dynamic and constantly changing, and cannot be characterized by static data which can be stored at a single site. Thus, if the dynamic data characterizing such participants are to be searched at a single site, then the data must first be downloaded to the site where the search is to be performed. During the time that such data are downloaded, they may well change, thereby compromising the accuracy of the search which is subsequently performed. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of some aspects of the invention to provide a method and system for determining priorities of a plurality of participants in accordance with one or more selection criteria and targeting those participants, if any, having the highest priority. It is a further object of some aspects of the invention to provide such a method and system wherein those participants having the highest priority can be targeted in a short time. Yet a further object of some aspects of the invention is to provide such a method and system wherein at least one of the targeted participants can be identified in order that a task can be allocated thereto. As used herein the term "priority" means, in addition to its normal meaning, an characterization according to a protocol which takes into consideration one or more characteristics associated with a person or object being characterized. According to a broad aspect of the invention a call is broadcast or otherwise transmitted to a plurality of remote stations. Each of the plurality of stations calculates its priority according to a preset protocol and broadcasts or transmits an indication signal during a time period which is indicative of the calculated priority, or preferably of a range of values of the priority. In general, more than one remote station broadcasts at the same time and frequency. In one embodiment of the invention, all of the stations broadcast at the same frequency. In a second embodiment of the invention, more than one frequency is used for communication and both the time and frequency indicate the priority. In a third embodiment of the invention, all of the stations transmit at the same time, and the priority range is characterized by the frequency of transmission. It should be understood that since more than one indication signal may be broadcast at the same time and frequency, there is no identification of the responding stations, but only an indication of those priorities (or rather ranges of priorities, since each time/frequency "slot" characterize a range of priorities) which characterize at least one remote station. A control center monitors the transmissions of the remote stations and determines which of the slots having an indication signal has the highest priority. It is convenient to order the response time period .into time (or time/frequency) slots each representing a range of priority values preferably in descending order of priorities. Thus, the control center need only look for the earliest slot which contains an indication signal. Having determined the highest range of priorities which are held by at least one remote station, a second call is broadcast or otherwise transmitted asking for responses only from those remote units within this range. The time or time/frequency slots are now distributed, either by a predetermined protocol or specifically by the particular call, so as to cover this range of priority values. The stations which have priorities within this range broadcast or otherwise transmit indication signals in response to the new call in the predetermined time or time/frequency slots. This process of determining the highest range of priorities and redividing the range continues until a given criteria is met. This stage of the process often termed herein the "targeting phase, " (sometimes referred to herein as the "first phase" or "phase one" ) ends when the priority range ceases to be significant or the number of sub-ranges which are filled falls below a predetermined number based on the statistics of the total number of participating remote stations and the final range or priorities or where some other predetermined criteria is reached. At this point the number of station which are responding to the highest priority is believed to be small. One method of distributing the time and frequency slots, which gives some indication of the number of responders having each priority, is to have all the responders having a given priority range transmit at the same time and at a frequency which is determined randomly (but within the system bandwidth). By determining how many of the frequency slots are filled, a measure of the number of responders within the priority range may be estimated. The system then preferably initiates an "identification phase" (sometimes referred to herein as "second phase" or "phase two") starting with the broadcast or other transmission of an additional call requesting those stations within the highest (final) range of priorities found in the targeting phase to identify themselves. Each of the stations having a priority in this range broadcasts or otherwise transmits a signal including an identifier of the station at a time, time/frequency or frequency slot which it chooses at random from one of a plurality of such available slots. If the number of expected stations within the range of priority values is expected to be only one with a high probability, then only one identification slot may be allotted. Other types of slots can also be used for the identification stage, such as coded spread spectrum signals. Additionally, multiple slots may be used for the same priority range to improve the reliability of detection in both the targeting and identification stages. The identification slots generally have an information carrying capacity which is larger than the slots used for indicating priorities since more information is transmitted during the identification phase. Since, when a plurality of remote stations are within the final range of values, it can be expected that more than one of the stations will respond in at least some of the slots, in which case their identification signal will be unintelligible. However, since the number of stations is relatively small, at least some of the slots will have only one identification signal. In general, the station having this signal is chosen since at this stage the difference in priority between the stations is generally unimportant. In some applications more than one identification signal may be broadcast in a particular slot, however, one signal may be clear. This station will then be chosen. There is thus provided, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, a method for priority discrimination between a plurality of remote stations, the stations having varying characteristics related to the priority, comprising the steps of: (a) first transmitting a call to a plurality of said remote stations; (b) calculating, at each of the stations, of a priority according to a predetermined protocol for the respective station; and (c) transmitting, by the stations, of a signal at a predetermined time and frequency, said time and frequency being indicative of the calculated priority. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, more than one station transmits at the same time and frequency. Preferably, the stations respond to the call during a predetermined period divided into time/frequency slots wherein each time slot represents a range of values of the priority. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the method includes the step of: transmitting at least one additional call requesting a response from those stations having a priority within a restricted range of priority values. Preferably, the stations respond to the additional call by transmitting a signal at a predetermined time and frequency, said time and frequency being indicative of the calculated priority within the restricted range of priorities. Preferably, a further call is made requesting those stations having a priority within a narrow band to transmit an identification signal. Preferably, the identification signals from a station having the narrow band of priority values is transmitted during one of a plurality of time/frequency slots chosen at random by the station and wherein a station whose identification signal is received clearly during a time/frequency slot is chosen. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the stations which transmit their identification signals are chosen by a random process which is carried out by the remote stations. In one embodiment of the invention all of the stations broadcast signals at substantially the same frequency. In a second embodiment of the invention the stations transmit their signals at different times and frequencies wherein, for priority determination, both the time and the frequency are indicative of the calculated priority. In a third embodiment of the invention all the stations transmit at the same time. There is further provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, apparatus for priority discrimination between a plurality of remote stations, the stations having varying characteristics related to the priority, comprising: (a) a first transmitter which transmits a call to a plurality of said remote stations; (b) computing apparatus at each of the stations, which calculate a priority of the station according to a predetermined protocol in response to the call; and (c) a plurality of second transmitters each associated with one of the remote stations which transmit a signal at a predetermined time and frequency, said time and frequency being indicative of the calculated priority. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In order to better understand the invention and to see how the same may be carried out in practice, non-limiting preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Fig. 1 shows schematically the principal components of a preferred system for carrying out the invention; Fig. 2 is a flow diagram showing the principal steps associated with a preferred method of carrying out the invention; Fig. 3 shows schematically how vehicles are targeted during an initial phase of targeting based on distance from the customer location in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention; , Fig. 4 shows schematically how vehicles are targeted during a second iteration of targeting based on distance; Figs. 5A and 5B are two portions of a state diagram showing various options associated with a first targeting phase according to a preferred embodiment of the invention; Figs. 6A and 6B are two portions of a state diagram showing various options associated with a second identification phase according to a preferred embodiment of the invention; Figs. 7A, and 7B show timing diagrams relating to the targeting and identification phases respectively of a priority discrimination according to a preferred embodiment of the invention; Fig. 8 is a block diagram showing the principal components in a control center according to a preferred embodiment of the invention; and Fig. 9 is a block diagram showing the principal components of a control unit in respect of each of the remote units in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Fig. 1 shows a typical scenario in connection with which the invention may be employed. In this scenario a geographical area 10 is defined by a boundary 11 within which a system according to the invention is operational. An identification system according to the invention includes a control center 12 and, optionally, a plurality of taxi stands 13, 14 and 15 which constitute sub-control units each of which serves a respective region within area 10 and which may forward a customer request to control center 12. Associated with each of stands 13, 14 and 15 are respective groups of participants (e.g. taxis) of which two groups 18 and 19 associated with stands 13 and 15, respectively, are shown in Fig. 1. The groups of participants 18 and 19 generally comprise some taxis which are stationary proximate their respective stands awaiting instructions therefrom and other taxis such as 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 which are circulating within area 10 and are either available for performing a task on receiving instructions or, alternatively, are occupied and therefore unavailable. A customer 25 located somewhere within area 10 relays a request for service to control center 12 telephonically via a Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). Control center 12, in turn, broadcast an invitation message to all of the participants in area 10 either directly or via a remote station 30 which is typically located so as to cover all of area 10. Control center 12 can also receive messages via station 30. Alternatively, control center 12 broadcasts and receives messages directly. Remote station 30 may be located inside area 10, or alternatively if the area is built up with tall buildings, outside the boundary of the built-up area, if this siting reduces the blocking of signals between the taxis and the repeater station by tall building and the like or for other reasons. Sometimes, customer 25 telephones a particular taxi stand since this is the nearest stand to the customer's location. In this case it is generally preferable that one of the taxis associated with the taxi stand be dispatched to the customer unless, of course, all of the taxis associated with the stand are currently occupied (or otherwise unsuitable), in which case one of the taxis associated with another of the stands will be allocated for the task. In this case, the association of a taxi with a particular stand may constitute at least one of the criteria involved in choosing the taxi to be allocated to customer 25. Such a selection criterion is a static variable and, once fixed, never varies because a taxi is always associated with one stand. However, the actual priority assigned to each of the taxis is also a function of several independent dynamic factors which are subject to constant fluctuation. Of these, the taxi's distance from the customer is the most important example. However, other dynamic conditions pertaining to a taxi's instantaneous status also affect the respective priority of the taxi so that, for example, a taxi which is currently occupied or one which has insufficient occupancy for the number of passengers to be collected would not participate in the selection process and a taxi which is waiting at a stand would get priority. The idle time of the taxi can also be an important criteria. It will be appreciated that in general there are many different contributory factors, or selection criteria, which influence the priority assigned to each individual taxi within area 10. Moreover, it is generally the case that each selection criterion has a different "weight" associated therewith so that the final magnitude of the priority associated with each respective taxi is built up from many different selection criteria each of which exert a different influence on the actual priority assigned. For example, in the simplest case, it may be that only distance from the taxi to customer 25 is of concern. Such a simple case would not take into consideration the fact that other customers may already have requested service and may not yet have been processed. Thus, another customer near customer 25 but still somewhat further away from the nearest available taxi in area 10, may have a prior claim for service. However, in the simplest of systems where only distance from the taxi to the customer is important, such a prior claim would not be recognized. In a preferred system where many factors are taken into account the priority assigned to each taxi may often be viewed as a multi-dimensional vector which is the vector sum of component priority vectors each relating to a different selection criterion. A preferred method for allocating a task to one of the taxis in response to a request by customer 25 will now be explained with reference to Figs. 2 to 7. For the sake of simplicity only, it will initially be assumed that the only selection criterion of interest is the distance of a taxi from customer 25. Fig. 2, shows a flow diagram of the operation of a preferred system of the invention. The left portion of the flow diagram comprises operation of a first, targeting, phase and the right portion of the flow diagram comprises operation of a second, identification phase. The targeting phase starts with the broadcasting of a call message to all of the participating taxis informing them that a priority must be determined for responding to a pending request for service. The criteria for determining the priority may be sent together with the call or, alternatively, may be part of a preset protocol used for all such determinations. Alternatively, there may be several such protocols one of which the call identifies by a code. In the very simple case of a dispatching system wherein distance of a taxi from a specified location is the only selection criterion, there is no need to inform the taxi of the selection criterion each time an invitation message is transmitted. Responsive to the call, each of the taxis uses the selection criteria to determine its own priority in accordance with the protocol. The protocol also includes a plurality of ranges of priority values and a communication protocol which subdivides a time period and/or a frequency range into a plurality of time or time/frequency slots each of which is associated with one of the ranges of priorities. Each of the participants who is not immediately eliminated from further participation owing to gross unsuitability (e.g., they are already occupied or is already responding to a call) responds to the call message by transmitting an indication signal in the appropriate time or time/frequency slot in accordance with his respective priority. The indication time slots all start at a time relative to a time base common to all of the participants. It is important to note that all those responding participants having a priority within the same range respond at the same time and frequency. As a result, substantially simultaneous indication signals are received by the control center from those participants having the highest priority as determined at the current priority resolution according to the protocol. The indication signals, which are preferably pulsed CW, are sufficiently non-destructive with respect to other simultaneously transmitted indication signals and have at least sufficient pulse width so as to permit an indication that at least one of the taxis has responded in a given time slot. In certain cases it may be necessary to add some dithering or other variations to the signals so as to avoid destructive interference. Since the indication signals may, and typically do, overlap, even a fairly narrow bandwidth broadcast channel may be employed, there being no requirement to discriminate between different indication signals in the same priority slot. The control center monitors any response and determines which slots have a true indicator signal (as opposed to noise or other transients). Preferably, the time slots are arranged in descending order of priorities, such that the control center may ignore all slots after the first "occupied" slot. The control center targets all those responding taxis having the highest priority range in respect of which a valid indication signal has been received. Except as will be described below, taxis having a lower priority are excluded from further consideration. If a predetermined criteria for stopping the targeting phase has not been reached, then an additional call is broadcast requesting all those taxis which have a priority within the highest priority range to respond. The response of the taxis is similar to that sent in the previous step except that the time or time/frequency slots now represent sub-ranges within the highest indicated priority range. In general the call will include this range and may include an indication of the protocol for dividing the slots among the priorities. It should be understood that, for the more general case of multiple criteria, the priority vector may be a function of the iteration number or of the priority range. Thus for example, the first iteration may be used to eliminate taxis which are far away from the destination without giving much weight to the idle time. The second iteration may give a greater weight to the idle time or to other factors. In general, taxis which have moved closer to the destination since the last call and have an increased priority may participate in the second iteration even if they did not have the highest priority in the previous iteration or were not detected as having this priority. Furthermore, a special slot may be provided for taxis whose priority is now higher than the highest range detected in the previous iteration. These taxis would take precedence over the other taxis by using the special slot. This iterative reduction of the number of participants continues until a predetermined criteria is reached. This criteria may include consideration of the priority resolution achieved. The criteria may include a statistical estimate of the number of vehicles which have not been eliminated. For example, if in a given iteration in which a substantial number of sub-slots have been allocated, only one or a few sub-slots contain a response, one can be fairly certain that the number of taxis left in the system is small and the iteration process (and the targeting phase) is ended. Another iterative approach which may sometimes be used is to restrict the responders in the first phase to a single range or a limited number of ranges. Assuming that the range of interest is between 0-10 km from the customer. A first call would only ask for responses from those taxis which are closer than 5 km from the customer. This distance could be divided into ranges or a single range could be used. If there were no responses, then the call would request responses from those taxis in the range of 5-10 km. If there were a response, then further delineation of the range would successively narrow the range of distances. Preferably, in the targeting phase no participants are actually identified, and therefore it is not yet possible for the control center to dispatch a particular taxi to the customer. Before this can be done, it is first necessary to complete a second, identification, phase wherein one of the taxis targeted at the end of the first phase is uniquely identified. An additional call is broadcast or otherwise transmitted to the participants indicating that an identification phase is begun. All of the targeted participants remaining at the end of the first phase are invited to broadcast or otherwise transmit their identification codes in one of a number of identification slots (which may be time or time/frequency slots). These slots have a duration commensurate with the information to be transmitted by the taxis. The number of identification time slots is determined in accordance with the protocol and is application-dependent, and may be based on the number of participants which are believed to be left. For example, in a dispatching system, the priority scale may extend from a distance of 10 km from the customer location and the initial priority resolution (so far as the distance criterion is concerned) may be 1 km which is reduced during two successive iterations to 100 m and finally to 1 m. At such a fine priority resolution it is not to be expected that more than a small number of taxis will be targeted so a fast converging identification phase having only a few time slots ought to be sufficient for identifying one of the targeted participants. It is not suggested that a i m distance is significant in determining priorities for taxis, however use of such fine distinctions aids in reducing the number of taxis which participate in the identification phase. However, as will be explained below, the protocol has built therein sufficient discrimination to allow for possible errors in the number of identification time slots allocated and to compensate for such errors as required. The identification slots are preferably not assigned in any way, and the taxis choose their slots in some random way. It can be expected that at for least some of the slots more than one taxi will broadcast its identification information. Such broadcasts can not be read by the control center which will choose the first taxi which it can identify. If multiple dispatches are required to the same destination, as for example where there are too many passengers for one taxi, the second phase may have to be repeated several times until the required number of taxis are dispatched. Furthermore, in extreme cases, it may be necessary to call for identification from taxis having a lower priority. As in the targeting phase, a slot may be provided in the identification phase for taxis having a higher priority than the call. These taxis may have moved closer to the destination or their signal may not have been received by the receiver due to interference or blockage. Having described the overall method for iteratively targeting, during a first phase, successively fewer participants and then, during a second phase, identifying a desired number of the targeted participants, there will now be described a specific application thereof to the scenario depicted in Fig. 1 and with reference to Figs. 3 to 7 of the drawings. Referring then to Fig. 3, a customer 25 has requested a taxi. Shown within a circular target area 40 centered about customer 25 and having a boundary 35 at different distances from customer 25 are four taxi vehicles designated as V a , V b , V c , and V d . Vehicles outside boundary 35 are excluded from consideration. Target area 40 is split into a plurality of concentric sectors of which only the outermost sectors 42, 43, 44 and 45 are shown each having a width ΔR and being radially disposed with respect to the customer. Adjacent sectors 42 and 43 or 43 and 44 or 44 and 45 are contiguous although for the sake of clarity and explanation they are shown in Fig. 3 as separated from each other. It will be noted that vehicles V b and V c are within the first (innermost) sector 42, vehicle V^ is within the middle sector 44 and vehicle V a is in the last (outermost) sector 45. Since it is desired to allocate the task of servicing the customer to the vehicle which is closest to him, it is clear that one of the two vehicles V b and V c in the innermost sector 42 must be identified as the most suitable for the task. It will also be apparent that the number of vehicles which exist in any particular sector is a function of the width of the sector. Thus, if the width of each sector is increased from ΔR to 3ΔR, it is apparent that vehicles V^, V c and V^ will now exist in the new, innermost sector comprising original sectors 42-44. In this manner, the width of each sector ΔR constitutes a priority resolution with which a priority is assigned to the participating vehicles. The coarser (i.e. lower) the resolution, the more vehicles will answer the selection criteria and be rated at a particular priority associated therewith while the finer (i.e. higher) the resolution, the smaller the number of vehicles which answer the selection criteria and are rated with the corresponding priority. Thus, after a first step of targeting in which a small group of taxis is chosen, in a second step of targeting the highest priority taxi, a coarse resolution (finer however than that in the first step) is set as shown in Fig. 3 and an call message is transmitted by control center 12 to all of the participants. The call message also preferably defines a time interval ΔT which is divided into an equal number of time slots Δt of equal width such that the total number of time slots is equal to the total number of priorities: i.e. the number of sectors. In a further preferred embodiment of the invention, frequency diversity can be used to define multiple slots at the same time, each of the slots being at a different frequency distinguishable by the control center. Upon receiving the call message, each of the participating taxis determines its priority in accordance with the selection criteria, which, in the simplest case, is assumed to be solely the distance of the participant from the customer and within the maximum radius R max - Thus, vehicles V b and V c are both assigned the highest priority, while vehicles V^ and V a ,(in that order) are assigned successively lower priorities. It should be noted that typically there may be hundreds of vehicles in the target area 40; only a few are shown in the figure for the sake of clarity. Further, each vehicle may have a handset (see Fig. 9) having a disabling switch by means of which the driver can prevent the transmission of a response message upon receiving an call message from control center 12. By such means he can go off duty, etc. The active participants V a to V d now transmit an indication signal within the time slot Δt corresponding to their priority. Thus, vehicles V j -, and V c transmit an indication signal first; vehicle V^ transmits his indication signal second; and vehicle V a transmits his indication signal third. In an actual situation, of course, there may exist many time slots corresponding to a large number of coarse resolution priorities and perhaps hundreds of vehicles will transmit an indication signal in the same time slot. This, in itself, is not important because all that matters during this first phase of the process is to determine the first time slot in which a vehicle transmits an indication signal. This having been done, it is immediately clear which is the nearest sector to the customer in which at least one vehicle is located and therefore all of the vehicles in all of the other sectors may now be eliminated. In a practical implementation of such a system, the broadcast and receive time for transmitting the call message from the control center to the participants and receiving the first indication signal therefrom takes a short time. Thus, in a relatively short time interval thousands of participants in the field can be reduced to a small number of potentially suitable participants for the task. Furthermore, if a duplex communication system is used, the control center need not wait for the entire time ΔT, and can go on to the next iteration or the next phase immediately when a first indication signal is received. As explained above, this process is repeated iteratively as often as required, each iteration having successively finer priority resolutions (i.e. sectors of successively decreasing width ΔR), until a predetermined resolution is reached. At this point, the width of the remaining sector is sufficiently small that only a small number of participants are likely to be found therein. It is, of course, not known how many participants there are in this remaining sector since regardless of whether only one participant or many send an indication signal starting at a particular time slot, the control center does not receive a message which is capable of uniquely identifying one of those participants. It should be noted that the receive time taken for the control center to process a response from the highest priority participants is a function of the number of time slots Δt. Thus, as the resolution is increased, there will be more time slots and, since each requires a minimum transmit time, it might take longer to identify the highest priority time slot. There is therefore a tradeoff between, on the one hand, increasing the resolution so as to identify the most suitable participant in fewer iterations and, on the other hand, increasing the cycle time of a given iteration by doing so. Fig. 4 shows a subsequent iteration of the targeting phase wherein the priority resolution is increased and a further call signal is transmitted to the participants. The currently targeted participants V j -, or V c in what is currently the highest priority sector 42 are assigned new slots according to the finer priority resolution and again transmit indication signals during time slots corresponding to their priorities. As a result, it transpires that V c has a higher priority than V b and its indication signal is therefore transmitted first. However, from the perspective of the control center, there is no way of knowing how many participants exist in what is now the highest priority sector. All that can be known is that at least one participant has the priority. Thus, while there may still be hundreds of participants in the targeted sector, it is expected that with the increased priority resolution only a small number of participants will now be targeted. One of these is now be identified to respond to the request for service. During this second phase of identification, the control center assigns a new time interval ΔT-ID and divides this time interval into a number of equal width time slots Δt related to the expected number of participants in the highest priority sector 42. The expected number of participants in sector 42 is determined statistically as a function of the resolution of the sector ΔR according to the application. The only remaining targeted participant V c in the highest priority sector 42 now selects randomly one of the time slots and transmits, within the randomly selected time slot, an identification message whereby the sending participant can be uniquely identified. In the more general case where there are still a number of targeted participants, the control center receives a plurality of identification messages some of which may, of course, have been transmitted during the same randomly selected time slot. However, it is expected that at least one of the identification messages can be uniquely identified and, in this case, the task is allocated to a participant which can be identified. Where possible, of course, in the interest of speed, the task is allocated to the first uniquely identifiable participant. If it is not possible to identify one of the participants uniquely, the communication protocol allows for appropriate action according to each particular situation. Thus, it may be that during the final iteration in phase one, no participants were targeted. This, itself could be due to several different reasons: for example, the call message may never have reached the participants or, more likely, the response of the highest priority participants may not have been received, possibly having been obstructed by an obstacle in its path. Alternatively, possibly too many participants were targeted in the final iteration of phase one and an insufficient number of identification time slots were allocated during phase two. In this case, identification messages may collide during all of the identification time slots, rendering it impossible to identify any one participant. In the more general case where more than one participant is to be identified, it may also occur that too few identification messages arrive in phase two owing to an insufficient number of participants having -been targeted in phase one. The various strategies for dealing with each of these possibilities from the point of view of the control center will now be described with reference to Figs. 5 and 6 which show state diagrams relating to the targeting and identification phases, respectively. In both of these diagrams the following terminology is employed: PHASE-l.x :x th iteration of phase 1, PHASE-2.X :x tn iteration of phase 2; IB :Control center's Broadcast Message; RD :Responders' signal Detection and signal processing; IBPHl.x :Control Center's x tn Broadcast messages in Phase 1; IBPH2.x :control center's tn Broadcast messages in Phase 2; ΔTRTPHl. :x tn time interval for Responder's Transmission activity in Phase 1; ΔTRTPH2. :x th time interval for Responder's Transmission activity in Phase 2; x :Number of iterations in Phase 1 or 2 (application-dependent); NIP :Total number of iterations performed in current Phase; Limitl, Limit2:Application-dependent maximum number of iterations for Phases 1 and 2, respectively. n : predetermined number of successful iterations PS : Priority slot Thus, referring to Figs. 5A and 5B, if during a successive iteration, no indication signal is received (i.e. a MISS is detected), the initiator requests at least once that all of the participants who have not yet been identified transmit a respective indication signal and this is repeated until an indication signal is received or for a maximum number of iterations determined in accordance with the protocol. Thereafter, whilst the resolution is higher than a minimum resolution determined in accordance with the protocol (and the iteration process has not been terminated for some other reason), further priorities having a coarser resolution are assigned to all of the participants who have not as yet been identified, or until the resolution reaches the minimum resolution. Another way of checking if a MISS is true is to provide an additional slot during which all of those stations which should have broadcast during the designated priority slots will broadcast again. If no signal is received during this slot, the MISS is verified. Referring to Figs. 6A and 6B, if during any iteration no identification message is received by the control center and during preceding iterations fewer than the desired number of identification messages were received so as to permit identification of the respective participants or if invalid data were received, there is further included the step of the control center requesting at least once that any currently targeted participants who have not yet been identified re-transmit their identification message. If fewer than the desired number of valid identification messages are received so as to permit identification of the respective participants owing to the occurrence of more than one identification message arriving in the same identification slot or to any other reason such as receipt of erroneous data, thereby rendering it impossible to determine the respective identifications, the following courses of action may be taken. One possibility is for the control center to allocate to all of the targeted participants still remaining and who have not yet been identified a greater number of discrete identification time slots than the number previously allocated, and to invite the targeted participants who have not yet been identified to transmit a respective identification message during one of the new identification time slots. In other words, the number of targeted participants is maintained but more identification time slots are allocated so as to increase the probability that the desired number of valid identification messages will be received by reducing the probability of collisions. Alternatively, the taxis can be required to choose a random number which will then be used compared to some reference number to eliminate some of the taxis or which can be used in changing the priorities of the taxis to eliminate some of them. Alternatively, an additional criteria may be added to reduce the number of participants. Alternatively, if the protocol allows a maximum priority resolution, then so long as the current priority resolution is lower than the maximum priority resolution, phase one can be repeated as required for a maximum number of iterations determined in accordance with the protocol at successively finer priority resolutions, until the maximum resolution is reached in respect of all of the participants who have not as yet been identified. This causes fewer participants to be targeted and again reduces the probability of collisions in phase two when any newly targeted participants are identified. If, on the other hand, during a successive iteration, fewer than the desired number of valid identification messages are received so as to permit identification of the respective participants owing to an insufficient number of participants having been targeted during preceding iterations, then the opposite must be done. Thus, so long as the resolution is higher than a minimum resolution determined in accordance with the protocol, phase one is repeated as required for a maximum number of iterations determined in accordance with the protocol at successively coarser priority resolutions until an indication signal is detected or the minimum resolution is reached. This process is performed in respect of all of the participants who have not as yet been identified and, by targeting participants in phase one who were not previously targeted, increases the probability that the desired number of newly targeted participants will subsequently be identified in phase two. If, during phase one, no indication signal is received in response to an call message, the control center requests at least once that the participants re-transmit an indication signal. On receipt of the call message, the participants assign themselves priorities and transmit respective indication signals during a corresponding indication time slot. This covers the possibility either that the call message never reached the targeted participants or, alternatively, that their responses never reached the control center. The protocol includes at least one termination condition whereby further iterations are not performed even if no indication signal has been received and/or if fewer than the desired number of participants have been identified. This is necessary to avoid an infinite loop being executed in the event that, in a particular application, there are not enough participants who can be identified. In all of the above cases, data is stored in respect of any participants who have already been identified and subsequent iterations are performed only to identify additional participants. Figs. 7A and 7B show a timing diagram relating to the flow of information between the control center and the participants V a , V b , V c and V d during the example of Figs. 3 and 4. It will be noted that in the initial phase of targeting, each participant selects a time slot according to his respective priority, such that participants with the highest priority transmit first. Consequently, as soon as the control center receives a response from the participants, the highest priority may be determined immediately in accordance with which time slot data was first received. Further iterations may now be effected, as required, there being no need even to await the responses of lower priority participants. This results in very rapid convergence of the targeting phase to the priority range containing the most suitable participant. This requires a full duplex system. Figs. 7A and 7B show the timing diagram for a half duplex system. In another embodiment of the invention priorities may be assigned according to a measured elapsed time since participants have performed some activity. for example, priorities are assigned to taxis according to the time they have been idle. In a first iteration of phase one, the mutually common priority scale relates to an elapsed time of say 3 hours and the priority resolution is say one-half hour. Thus, each interval in the priority scale corresponds to an elapsed time of one-half hour. In a second iteration of phase one, the mutually common priority scale relates to an elapsed time of one-half hour and the priority resolution is 2.5 min. Thus, each interval in the priority scale corresponds to an elapsed time of 2.5 min. If the during the first iteration a signal was received in the time slot of two to two and one-half hours, then the time slots in the second phase may have a - 26 - resolution of 2.5 min. and span the range between these limits. If this is considered to be sufficiently fine so that not too many participants will have the same priority, the process is terminated after only two iterations. It is now appropriate to implement phase two wherein one of the targeted participants is identified. It will be understood that since, during the identification phase, a participant is, in effect, selected randomly, it cannot be assured that the identified participant is actually the one who has waited the longest. However, it can be said with certainty that the identified participant has the highest priority to within the priority resolution (in this case 2.5 min.). If, notwithstanding the above expectation, it becomes impossible to identify a single participant in phase two owing to too many participants having been targeted during phase one, then, as explained above, several options are available. More identification time slots can be allocated in phase two or, alternatively, a further iteration in phase one can be performed at an even finer priority resolution, for example 6 sec, before repeating phase two in respect of a smaller number of targeted participants or one of the other options described above may be employed. In all of the embodiments described above, at least two phases are required to identify a targeted participant. Thus, during a first phase, participants are only targeted and are identified during a subsequent second phase. However, according to a more sophisticated scheme, provision may be made for identifying a participant during the first phase by transmitting an identification message as the indication signal. The identification message can be decoded in the particular circumstance that only one participant has the highest priority, so that only one indication signal is transmitted in the highest priority time slot, and there is a sufficiently long time interval between receipt of successive indication signals by the control center to allow decoding of the identification signal before a lower priority indication signal arrives in a subsequent indication time slot. Alternatively, the identification time slots are made long enough so that different slots do not overlap. In this particular case, the second phase of identifying the targeted participants is eliminated. Yet a further consideration relates to the possibility that the highest priority participant may not be targeted in phase one owing to a malfunction. Thus, for example, his indication signal may not be received having been obstructed by an obstacle in his path or where his signal is subject to fade. This may not matter if other participants having the same priority have nevertheless been able to transmit indication signals, since if, the indication time slot having the highest priority is determined and all the participants associated therewith are targeted, even a participant whose indication signal was lost will still be targeted. However, if a sole participant's indication signal is lost this could prevent correct determination of the highest priority participant. The protocol can take this possibility into account by reserving, preferably, the first indication time slot in the next iteration for exclusive transmission therein by a non- targeted participant having a higher priority than that of the targeted participants. The control center then transmits a call message inviting the targeted participants to transmit a respective indication signal during any one of the indication time slots except the reserved indication time slot. So far as newly targeted participants are concerned, the process is essentially unchanged; each of the newly targeted participants transmits an indication signal one of the unreserved indication time slots according to his respective priority. However, any previously non-targeted participant having a higher priority than that of the newly targeted participants transmits a respective indication signal during the reserved time slot. Within a single iteration of phase one, the assignment of priorities to each participant may be performed in respect of a different sub-set of selection criteria for at least some of the participants. In effect, this permits different search strategies to be executed each in respect of a respective indication time slot. For example, the first indication time slot having the highest priority may relate to all participants who are located within a radius of 10 m from the customer without any further restriction; whilst the second indication time slot may relate to all participants who are located within a radius of 25 m and who have been awaiting instructions for more than 20 minutes. By this means Boolean OR search or other search strategies can be performed in a single iteration. Furthermore, during each iteration the participants may optionally assign themselves a priority having a magnitude outside the priority scale so as not to be targeted by the initiator. This can be done if, for example, a participant is otherwise occupied or for any other reason does not wish to receive instructions. During a particular iteration the priorities assigned to each participant should be absolute with respect to a mutually common scale which itself is external to the participants and independent thereof. However, between successive iterations the priority scale may well relate to different combinations of selection criteria. By this means finely tuned search strategies can be performed whereby all participants answering to a first combination of selection criteria are targeted during a first iteration, whilst all of the targeted participants answering to a different combination of selection criteria are targeted during a successive iteration. Once a sufficiently small number of participants are targeted such that, in accordance with the protocol, identification of a desired number of participants is likely to yield a successful outcome, the second phase described above is commenced. The number of identification slots to be allocated to the targeted participants is calculated by first estimating the number of targeted participants remaining at the end of phase one. The number of identification slots is then calculated according to the estimated number of targeted participants who must transmit respective identification messages, so as to reduce the total time required to identify the required number of participants. In this connection, it will be realized that there exists a tradeoff between allocating too many and too few identification time slots. Specifically, allocating too many identification time slots reduces the probability of a targeted participant selecting an early identification slot, thereby increasing the time required to identify the highest priority participants. On the other hand, allocating too few identification time slots increases the probability that more than one participant will select the same identification time slot. In this case, the resulting collision of more than one identification message makes it impossible to identify the respective participants, requiring further iterations and again increasing the identification time. In practice the number of identification time slots may be minimized by increasing the maximum priority resolution in phase one in order•to target no more than the expected number of participants who are to be identified in phase two, or by using a random process to eliminate some of the participants. In the specific embodiments described above the process of assigning priorities to each of the participants is performed within the participating vehicles themselves since only they know their locations relative to the customer. Moreover, the onus of tracking the participants' movements in terms of their location, availability, occupancy, loading and all the other selection criteria which may be of significance is now passed to the participating vehicles themselves as opposed to hitherto proposed systems wherein a central dispatcher had to keep track of all these parameters. As a result of this, the communication channel between the control center and the participants may be of relatively narrow spectrum width compared with that of hitherto proposed systems. Additionally, the task of targeting potentially suitable participants is distributed amongst the participants themselves rather than being determined solely by the control center. Such distribution results in a reduction of computing power being required by the control center. While the selection criteria must obviously be known to the participating vehicles, the manner in which this is made known can be varied according to circumstances. Thus, for example, the selection criteria may be fixed and known in advance to the participants (in which case the selection criteria are not subject to change). Alternatively, the selection criteria may be determined on-line by the control center and then transmitted to all of the participants together with the call message. Thus, in the particular example described above, during the first phase of targeting it may be predetermined that each sector has a width of 10 km and that in subsequent phases, the width of each remaining sector is reduced by a factor of 10 until the sector has a width of only 10 m, whereupon all those vehicles within the 10 m width sector send an identification message; or, alternatively, the width of each sector in each respective phase of allocation may be transmitted to the participants by the control center. In order to reduce the number of participants in the identification phase, the resolution in the targeting phase may be increased artificially, i.e., past the point at which it is meaningful. It should also be noted that once a particular participant has been uniquely identified to perform a task, he is notified of this in the normal way by the control center, in any one of a number of ways which are well known in the art as for example, by voice over a communication channel. Furthermore, although in the preferred embodiment described above, one participant is uniquely identified as the most suitable, in fact it may sometimes be appropriate to omit the second phase of identification altogether. In such cases, the participants having the highest priority are not uniquely identified as individuals but all are identified as a group. One such situation relates to the improvement of service in particular areas. In this situation the number of taxis in a given area (a given distance from a fixed point) is monitored and additional cars are sent in to the area if there are not enough cars in the area. The number of cars may be estimated statistically, for example, from the number of slots having responses in very fine priority slot situation. Another application of the system of priority assignment according to the invention is in the assignment of available lines for car-phones or transceivers. Presently, available lines are allocated on a when available basis. Thus, one unlucky user may wait a long time while a lucky user may get an immediate line. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, when a user wants a line, he indicates this either by pressing a call button or by lifting his receiver. A computer chip associated with the car-phone notes the time at which a line was requested. Lines are allocated on a waiting ' time basis. In operation, a control center broadcasts a call for priorities in accordance with a targeting phase of the present invention. The priority is assigned according to waiting time, and the individual phones broadcast signals during time slots assigned according to their waiting time. During a second identification phase one of the phones is identified, in the same manner as described above, and is given the available line. Referring now to Fig. 8 there is shown schematically the principal features associated with control center shown in Fig. 1. Thus, there is provided a transceiver and modem 50 coupled to an antenna 51 for effecting bi-directional communication with the participants (taxis) and being connected to a message processor 53 which is coupled to a computer 54. Message processor 53 receives non-demodulated signals from the transceiver and determines which slots contain signals for the targeting phase and identifies the participant( s ) in the identification phase. A service request is effected by customer 25 by telephoning his nearest taxi rank and then dialing his telephone number, the request being routed to the computer 54 via a Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) . The computer 54 converts the customer's telephone number to a corresponding location based on a data base stored in the computer. Alternatively, such communication can be effected via an operator. A terminal 56 is coupled to the computer 54 for allowing an operator to enter commands and display data. In addition the system also allows for voice signaling to a dispatcher at the control station or for voice communication between the taxi driver to the customer. Fig. 9 shows the principal components associated with a participant allocation unit 60 located in each of the vehicles. Allocation unit 60 preferably includes a transceiver 61 coupled to an antenna 62 for effecting bi- directional communication with the transceiver 50 in the control center 37. Transceiver 61 is connected to a vehicle computer 64 coupled to a microphone/handset 65 providing a human interface between the vehicle computer 64 and the corresponding taxi driver. A Global Positioning System 66 (GPS) or other position determining system as known in the art receives positioning data via an antenna 68. The Global Positioning System 66 is coupled to the vehicle computer 64 and functions as a positioning means for providing positioning information relative to a predetermined origin in respect of the corresponding participant. Thus, once the location of the customer is provided to the vehicle computer 64, the latter, being coupled to the Global Positioning System 66 is able to determine the relative location of the participant to the customer and thus determine the participant's priority. Associated with the vehicle computer 64 is a storage means 70 for storing the protocol according to which priorities are assigned. Also stored in the storage means 70 are any singular areas which can affect .the actual route e.g. obstructions such as rivers, road blocks and so on which result in the actual route distance being longer than it would otherwise be. As explained above, the handset 65 allows the driver to assign himself a priority outside the range of the priority scale and, by such means, to exclude himself from the process of targeting. It also includes a microphone for establishing voice contact with the control center, as well as paging means for obtaining a text message therefrom. The system described above may include a full duplex broadcast network such that the control center does not need to await responses from all of the participants before targeting the highest priority participants. Thus, specifically, as soon as a valid response is received by the control center, the participants corresponding to the response can immediately be targeted or identified whilst informing other participants to stop transmitting indication signals or identification messages. This permits the steps of targeting and/or identifying participants to be effected more quickly. However, the invention may also be employed in a simplex (i.e. half-duplex) broadcast network, albeit at the expense of longer targeting and identification times since the control center cannot transmit to the participants until all their responses have first been received and validated. It will be appreciated that, instead of employing a Global Positioning System, other systems for determining a participant's location can equally well be employed. For example, a route scheduler based on dead reckoning responsive to each participant's location can be used for determining a route having minimum distance. Such a route scheduler might possibly comprise sensors located at intervals along the road for sensing a passing vehicle's presence and for transmitting to the vehicle data representative of its location relative to a specified location for error correction. Typically, such a route scheduler has a memory for storing therein a scaled contour map so that an optimal route can be determined taking into consideration the nature of the terrain. Likewise, prevailing traffic conditions can be fed into the route scheduler at regular intervals of time, so that traffic jams, roadwork and so on can be considered when determining the optimal route. In the foregoing description it has also been assumed that a single channel broadcast network is employed. However, this is by no means essential and a centralized controlled trunking system having at least two channels may equally well be employed. This permits more than one task to be handled simultaneously each on a different broadcast channel. Thus, in the case of a two channel broadcast network, for example, having first and second channels, each call message is transmitted via a broadcast control channel so as to be received by all the participants associated with the first channel. Upon determining that he has not been targeted by the control center, a participant starts to measure elapsed time and waits a predetermined elapsed time locked on to the first channel and thereafter returns to the broadcast control channel for receiving further call messages. The period of time during which a non-targeted participant remains locked on to the first channel is of sufficient duration to allow an updated priority to be assigned to the participant. Owing to the dynamic variation in a participant's status, it may occur that, with an updated priority, a previously non-targeted participant becomes targeted in the next iteration. Thus, the period of time during which a non-targeted participant remains locked on to the first channel must further be of sufficient duration to allow a corresponding indication signal and/or identification message to be transmitted by the participant to the control center, whereby the control center may target and/or identify the participant. Alternatively, the call message may be transmitted via a broadcast control channel so as to be received by all the participants associated with the first channel and, upon - 35 - determining that he has not been targeted by the control center, a participant receives from the control center an instruction to return immediately to the broadcast control channel. This immediately frees a non-targeted participant to participate in a subsequent search strategy on the second channel relating to a different task. According to yet another variation, an initial call message is transmitted together with the selection criteria via a broadcast control channel so as to be received by all the participants associated with the first channels. Each of the participants receiving the call message assigns to himself from the priority scale a respective priority representative of his relative suitability in accordance with the selection criteria and transmits an indication signal during a respective indication slot. Only the targeted participants switch to the first channel and subsequent call messages are transmitted only to those participants who have been previously targeted by the control center. This again frees a non-targeted participant to participate in a subsequent search strategy on the second channel relating to a different task. It will be appreciated that whilst the invention has been described with particular application to a taxi dispatching service, the invention has more general application wherever one or a group amongst a plurality of participants is to be targeted in accordance with their respective suitabilities based on at least one selection criterion. It will further be understood that, whilst the preferred embodiment has been described for the sake of simplicity with regard to only two selection criterion (i.e. distance and waiting time), in practice a large number of selection criteria may be employed, all having different relative weights, whereby an integrated search strategy may be implemented. It will also be understood that whilst the invention has been described with particular reference to 2 dimensional terrain, it can equally well be applied in 3 dimensional space and is thus suitable for air or space travel, as well as land and sea. Mention should also be made of the variable parameters in association with which the protocol functions. These are generally application dependent and typically are provided with default values built into the protocol. Thus, if distance is one of the selection criteria, this fact may be represented by a default value of an associated parameter. Likewise, the lower and upper bounds of the priority scale and the priority resolution associated with each iteration in phase one can been assigned to respective parameters each having corresponding default values. Any unassigned parameters must, of course, have values assigned thereto prior to initiation of phase one. This can be done during the initiation of the process prior to transmitting the first call message to the participants. However, in certain applications, all the parameters may have pre-assigned default values which are acceptable for the application. In this case, the call message merely starts the process enabling the participants to determine the appropriate priority scale and assign themselves respective priorities at the appropriate priority resolution; there being no need to inform any of the participants of the boundary values of the priority scale or of the priority resolution or indeed of the selection criteria. While the invention has been described with particular reference to a wireless broadcast network, it will be appreciated that the invention is capable of much more general application. For example, hard-wired communication systems may also employ the principles of the invention in which case the indication signals need no longer be CW. In such cases the dynamic variables would generally not be position; however the system is generally applicable to systems with any set of dynamic variables. The principles of the invention may also be used in a routing system, for example to a system which identifies buses or other vehicles which are delayed and adjusts the speed and/or location of other buses to compensate therefor. In the first (targeting) stage of this utilization of the invention, the priority would for example be based on the amount of time that a vehicle is behind schedule. Vehicles which are behind schedule more than a predetermined amount would then be targeted and identified in a second (identification) stage. Preferably, the identified bus would then be asked for its exact position. A query would then be sent to other busses on the same bus line asking them for their positions and, optionally, where they stand in relation to their schedule. Based on this information, a control center would determine corrective action to provide improved service, which may include steps such as speeding up some buses, as for example by operating them in a skip-rstop fashion, slowing some buses down, keeping some buses from leaving the terminal or adding new buses to the route, perhaps at some intermediate point on the route. Suitable instructions would, of course, be transmitted to these busses after a corrective action plan is formulated. The principles of the invention are also applicable to a routing system for determining slow areas of traffic and rerouting traffic around such areas. In such a system a large number of participating vehicles are queried as to the delays they are experiencing. When a vehicle experiences a delay above a threshold, the position of the vehicle is determined in the second phase. It should be noted that no identification signal per se is transmitted in the second phase, instead a position signal is broadcast. Preferably, the delay is also verified by the driver of the vehicle to avoid false alarms. Once the position of the targeted delayed vehicle is determined, a new first (targeting) stage determines those vehicles that are close to the specific delayed vehicle, and determines, by successive second stages, the extent of the delay as a function of the time of the delay. Furthermore, by making multiple queries, the traffic conditions can be estimated. Based on this information, the seriousness of the delay may be determined and corrective action, such as re- routing of other vehicles, may be started. In particular, information on the traffic conditions and the geographical extent of the delay may be transmitted to vehicles which have routing apparatus of types which are known in the art, to be used by these apparatus for determining the optimum route for the receiving vehicle.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method for priority discrimination among a plurality of remote stations , the stations having varying characteristics related to the priority , comprising the steps of : (a) transmitting a call to a plurality of said remote stations; (b) calculating, at each of the stations, of a priority according to a predetermined protocol for the respective station in response to the call; and (c) transmitting, by the stations, of a signal at a predetermined time and frequency, said time and frequency being indicative of the calculated priority. 2. A method according to claim 1 wherein more than one station transmits a signal at the same time and frequency. 3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein all of the stations transmit a signal at substantially the same frequency. 4. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the stations transmit at predetermined times and frequencies and wherein both the time and the frequency are indicative of the calculated priority. 5. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein all of the stations transmit a signal at substantially the same time and wherein the transmitted frequency is indicative of the calculated priority. 6. A method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the stations respond to the call during a predetermined period divided into time/frequency slots and wherein each slot represents a range of values of the priority. 7. A method according to any of the preceding claims and including the step of: transmitting at least one additional call requesting a response from those stations having a priority within a restricted range of priority values. 8. A method according to claim 7 wherein the stations respond to the additional call by transmitting a signal at a predetermined time and frequency, said time and frequency being indicative of the calculated priority within the restricted range of priorities. 9. A method according to claim 8, wherein all of the stations transmit at substantially the same frequency in response to the additional call. 10. A method according to claim 8, wherein the stations transmit at different times and frequencies in response to the additional call and wherein both the time and the frequency of this transmission are indicative of the calculated priority. 11. A method according to claim 8, wherein all of the stations transmit at substantially the same time in response to the additional call and wherein the frequency of this transmission is indicative of the calculated priority. 12. A method according to any of the preceding claims and including the step of: transmitting a further call requesting those stations having a priority within a narrow range to transmit an identification signal. 13. A method according to claim 12, wherein identification signals from stations having the narrow band of priority values are transmitted during one of a plurality of time/frequency slots chosen at random by each of the stations and wherein a station whose identification signal is received clearly during a time/frequency slot is chosen. - 41 - 14. A method according to claim 13 and including the step of: choosing, by a random process at the remote stations, those stations which transmit their identification signals. 15. A method according to claim 13 or claim 14, wherein all of the stations transmit their identification signals at substantially the same frequency. 16. A method according to claim 13 or claim 14, wherein the stations transmit their identification signals at different times and frequencies. 17. A method according to claim 13 or claim 14, wherein all of the stations transmit their identification signals at substantially the same time. 18. Apparatus for priority discrimination between a plurality of remote stations, the stations having varying characteristics related to the priority, comprising: (a) a first transmitter which transmits a call to a plurality of said remote stations; (b) computing apparatus at each of the stations, which calculate a priority of the station according to a predetermined protocol in response to the call; and (c) a plurality of second transmitters each associated with one of the remote stations which transmits a signal at a predetermined time and frequency, said time and frequency being indicative of the calculated priority. 19. Apparatus according to claim 18 wherein more than one of the plurality of second transmitters transmits at the same time and frequency. 20. Apparatus according to claim 18 or claim 19, wherein all of the second transmitters transmit at substantially the same frequency. 21. Apparatus according to claim 18 or claim 19, wherein the second transmitters transmit at different times and frequencies and wherein both the time and the frequency are indicative of the calculated priority. 22. Apparatus according to claim 18 or claim 19, wherein all of the second transmitters transmit at substantially the same time and wherein the frequency is indicative of the calculated priority. 23. Apparatus according to any of claims 18-22, wherein the stations respond to the call during a predetermined period divided into time/frequency slots and wherein each time slot represents a range of values of the priority. 24. Apparatus according to any of claims 18-23 and including means for causing the first transmitter to transmit at least one additional call requesting a response from those stations having a priority within a restricted range of priority values. 25. Apparatus according to claim 24 wherein the stations include means for responding to the additional call by causing the second transmitters to transmit a signal at a predetermined time and frequency, said time and frequency being indicative of the calculated priority within the restricted range of priorities. 26. Apparatus according to claim 25, wherein all of second transmitters transmit at substantially the same frequency in response to the additional call. 27. Apparatus according to claim 25, wherein the plurality of second transmitters transmit at predetermined times and frequencies in response to the additional call and wherein both the time and the frequency of this transmission are indicative of the calculated priority. 28. Apparatus according to claim 25, wherein all of second transmitters transmit at substantially the same time in response to the additional call and wherein the frequency of this transmission is indicative of the calculated priority. 29. Apparatus according to any of claims 18-28 and including: means for causing the first transmitter to transmit a further call requesting those stations having a priority within a narrow range to transmit an identification signal. 30. Apparatus according to any claim 29 and comprising: means associated with each of the stations for causing a second transmitter associated with a station to transmit an identification signal during one of a plurality of time/frequency slots chosen at random by the station; and means for choosing one of the stations whose identification signal is received clearly during a time/frequency slot. 31. Apparatus according to claim 30 and including: means for choosing, by a random process at the remote stations, those stations which transmit their identification signals. 31. Apparatus according to claim 30 or claim 31 wherein all of the stations transmit their identification signals at substantially the same frequency. 32. Apparatus according to claim 30 or claim 31 wherein the stations transmit their identification signals at different times and frequencies. 33. Apparatus according to claim 30 or claim 31 wherein all of the stations transmit their identification signals at substantially the same time.

Inventors: MINTZ YOSEF, MINTZ, YOSEF
Applicants: LEW HELEN, MINTZ YOSEF, LEW, HELEN, MINTZ, YOSEF
Application year: 1993
Main classification: H04Q7
IPC codes: G08G1, H04B7, H04W72, H04W74