Method and apparatus for controlling a system of compressors to achieve load sharing

Abstract: Load sharing is achieved in a multiple compressor system by a program in a computer which sends signals to, and receives data from, a microcontroller located at each compressor. One compressor, designated as the lead compressor, furnishes its operating parameters, via the computer, to all the other, lag, compressors. The operating parameters include inlet valve position and bypass valve position of each compressor and the microcontroller controls the actuation of both valves. When system demand decreases, compressors are gradually unloaded, and then stopped to go off-line. When system demands increase, compressors are first started, and then gradually loaded before going on-line. Compressors go both on-line and off-line subject to certain time delays so that compressors are gradually added to, or shed from, the load. To equalise running time, all compressors in the system may undergo a periodic rotation and compressors go off-line in reverse order that they came on-line.

Description: This invention relates to a control system and method for controlling a plurality of compressors; more particularly, the invention relates to a control system and method for a plurality of compressors which provides for efficient load sharing between the plurality of compressors. Typically, a plurality of compressors are assembled to supply compressed air to a given industrial facility. In such assemblies, it is generally desirable to have each one of the plurality of compressors operating at, or near, similar operating points so that the load is shared generally equally between each one of the compressors. Furthermore, it is also desirable to shed compressors from the assembly when the load decreases so that the demands of the facility can be satisfied with fewer running compressors in the assembly; by the same token, whenever the demands of the load exceed the available supply from the on-line compressors, additional units have to be brought into the system so that costly facility shutdowns due to lack of compressed air are avoided. Known systems which have addressed load sharing have done so particularly by controlling certain operating parameters of the compressors, such as, e.g., the amount of air flowing, the pressure of the supplied air, etc. In the case where the compressors are of the centrifugal type, the principal operating parameters are pressure and flow rate, both governed by control of the inlet valve to a centrifugal compressor, and the bypass valve thereof. In other words, the inlet valve is used to control the flow rate of the compressor (at a certain designated or desired pressure) and, when the required control is below the range of control exercisable by the inlet valve, engagement of an auxiliary control represented by a controlled opening, or closing, of the bypass valve which allows the compressor to dump excess flow into, for example, the atmosphere, is used. It is clear that by-passing the compressor, and dumping air flow into the atmosphere (rather than delivering it to the load) represents a waste of energy. Those known compressor systems which have attempted to equalise the load between a plurality of compressors have generally been unable to consistently, and repeatedly, equalise both compressor output, and total running time, because, in part, inadequate attention was paid to characteristics of such compressor systems. For example, known compressor systems have not followed a rigorous routine for bringing compressors on-line, when demanded, and take them off-line when there is reduced demand. Haphazard control over the compressor units added to, or shed from, the system may lead to unequal distribution of either load, or total running time, as between the various compressors. It will be appreciated that any system utilising a plurality of compressors to supply the air demands of a facility, and which is controlled by load sharing systems and methods, should avoid an overly tight control loop which would cause premature additions to, or removal of, individual compressors to and from the system. Momentary fluctuations in air demand should be allowed without triggering the addition, or removal, of compressors. For example, electric motors which are commonly used as the prime mover to drive a compressor, are limited in the amount of restarts allowed for a given unit of time. Thus, if an electric motor to drive a compressor has come on line in the system it is desirable to prevent that same electric motor and its associated compressor from coming off-line for a given period of time to thus prevent a premature restart. Any load-sharing method and apparatus should also take into account the fact that compressors in general, and centrifugal compressor in particular, have operating conditions which are at the extremities of their performance envelopes. For example, centrifugal compressors are known to "surge", a condition characterised by reverse flow in the compressor, which not only disrupts the flow of air from the compression process, but which may also damage the compressor elements. WO 88/05939 discloses a method of operating a number of air compressors each contributing to a total capacity of a system, there being sensing means and control means to estimate the expected demand from the system and controlling the compressors accordingly. According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a compressed air system comprising: a plurality of centrifugal compressors, each one having an inlet valve and a bypass valve; means for storing compressed air at a predetermined system pressure, the compressed air storage means being disposed in fluid receiving relation with the plurality of centrifugal compressors; at least one control means for controlling a set point pressure for each centrifugal compressor; means for sensing the system pressure communicating with said at least one control means; characterised by means for identifying a predetermined centrifugal compressor to be unloaded from the compressed air system, the identifying means having a logic routine which ranks each centrifugal compressor with respect to the total time of compressor operation, and wherein the logic routine determines the lowest ranked centrifugal compressor having a bypass valve which has a position exceeding the bypass valve maximum position set point, and identifies said centrifugal compressor as the centrifugal compressor to be unloaded; and computer means for testing the identified centrifugal compressor to determine whether said centrifugal compressor should be unloaded from the compressed air system, the computer means communicating with said at least one control means and including a timing means which is activated upon identifying said predetermined centrifugal compressor, and whereupon deactivation, the computer means causes said at least one control means to decrease the set point pressure of said compressor to prevent a surge event from occurring in said compressor. According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method, in a compressed air system having a plurality of centrifugal compressors, each one having an inlet valve and a bypass valve, the centrifugal compressors supplying compressed air to a storage vessel at a predetermined system pressure, unloading a predetermined centrifugal compressor from the compressed air system characterised by the following steps: establishing a pressure set point for each operating centrifugal compressor; establishing a bypass valve maximum position for each centrifugal compressor; ranking each centrifugal compressor with respect to the total time of compressor operation; determining the position of each bypass valve (24a-24c); comparing the position of each bypass valve to a respective bypass valve maximum position; identifying a centrifugal compressor having the lowest rank and a bypass valve position greater than its bypass valve maximum position as a centrifugal compressor to be unloaded; activating a timer having a predetermined timing period upon identifying the centrifugal compressor to be unloaded; resetting the timer if at any time during the timing period the bypass valve position of the identified centrifugal compressor is equal to or less than the bypass valve maximum position; and upon deactivation of the timer, decreasing the set point pressure of the identified centrifugal compressor in a manner which prevents a surge event from occurring in said compressor. For a better understanding of the invention, and to show how the same may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings, in which:- Figure 1 is a schematic block diagram showing a plurality of compressors supplying a common load, Figure 2 is a flow chart of a control routine of a so-called lead compressor, Figure 3 is a flow chart of the control routine of a lag compressor, Figure 4 is a flow chart of the control routine of a load sharing system, Figures 5A and 5B illustrate the control activities on a given compressor in which both inlet valve and the bypass valves are controlled, and Figures 6A-6F show flow charts utilised in the present compressor control system. With reference to Figure 1, there is shown a plurality of compressors 20a-c. Each of the compressors 20a-c is provided with respective adjustable inlet valves (IV), 22a-22c. Furthermore, each of the respective compressors 20a-c is also provided with respective adjustable bypass valve (BV) 24a-24c. Each one of the compressors 20a-20c is provided also with respective conduits 26a-c feeding into respective one way check valves 28a-28c, prior to supplying a manifold 30 with compressed air suitable for supplying an industrial facility. Each one of the respective compressors 20a-c has associated therewith respective microcontrollers 32a-32c for controlling the respective adjustable inlet valves (IV) 22a-c and the respective adjustable bypass valves (BV) 24a-c. Each microcontroller 32 may use an Intel 8051 chip (Intel is a trademark of the Intel Co.) as its basis. The respective microcontrollers 32a-c communicate with a computer, PC 34, by way of a bidirectional network so that certain control functions, as will be detailed below, of the respective microcontrollers 32a-c are controlled by a program in PC 34. Microcontrollers 32a-c also function, under certain conditions, as will be detailed below, to control both the respective IV's 22a-22c, and the respective BV's 24a-24c of each compressor. The microcontrollers 32a-c also provide the program resident in PC 34 with certain operating information of each of the respective compressors 20a-20c. In accordance with the load-sharing aspects of the system, one of the compressors 20a-20c is designated as the "lead" compressor from which certain data is used to control the remaining (lag) compressors, which take their operating cues from the lead compressor under the control of a program stored in PC 34. For example, if compressor 20a is designated as the "lead" compressor, the remaining compressors 20b and 20c will track the operating parameters of lead compressor 20a. Thus, for example, if, as in a manner to be subsequently described, IV 22a of lead compressor 20a assumes a certain position, this position is communicated from microcontroller 32a to PC 34 which then instructs microcontrollers 32b and 32c to adjust their respective IV's 22b and 22c to assume a similar position. That is, as microcontroller 32a goes through one of its routines, as described with reference to Figure 2, which leads to an adjustment of IV 22a, the microcontrollers 32b and c of the "lag" compressors 20b and 22c will likewise cause their IV's 22b and 22c to follow the same routine. With reference to Figure 2, a lead compressor, such as 20a, is caused to undergo a repeated routine in which the system pressure 'P', as it exists in manifold 30, is continually compared to the set point, or desired, pressure 'P'. Such a comparison is performed in step 100 of the flow chart illustrated in Figure 2. If the system 'P' is greater than the set point 'P', a yes decision causes the particular microcontroller 32 to execute, at step 102 of the control routine, a process which calls for dropping the IV of the lead compressor toward a position CLL (current limit, low) beyond which the IV of a particular compressor cannot be adjusted. If system 'P' is still greater than the set point 'P', step 102 will no longer adjust the position of IV, but will now start to open the bypass valve, BV, of a given compressor. If the comparison of step 100 yields a no, thereby indicating that the system pressure is below the desired level, step 104 calls for, first, closing the bypass valve of a compressor until it is fully closed whereafter, and next, if the system pressure is still not up to the desired, set point level, step 104 will further cause the inlet valve, IV, to be opened until the desired pressure is achieved. Whether looping through step 102 or step 104, step 106 is executed to place the position of both the inlet valve (IV) and position of the bypass valve (BV) of the lead compressor in a buffer for transfer. If the CEM (Centac Energy Master - a tradename of the Ingersoll Rand Co.) program is present and operating, the IV and BV values of the lead compressor, arrived at in steps 102 or 104, are sent to the CEM program, in step 108, the CEM program being resident in PC 34 (see Figure 1). If a centrifugal compressor has its inlet throttle valve, IV, adjusted closed beyond a certain point, known as the CLL (current limit, low) point, possibly undesirable surge conditions may be caused. If still further pressure reduction is to be achieved in any one compressor, control thereof is achieved by opening the bypass valve, rather than further adjustment in the IV position. Thus, a particular microcontroller 32 associated with each compressor will, if faced with the CLL limit, disregard any further instructions, from the CEM program stored in PC 34 to further close IV, and will instead start to open the bypass valve, BV, of the particular compressor to further reduce the system pressure. When system pressure is below the desired set point pressure, a "reverse" action of the previous routine is followed by each microcontroller 32 to first close the bypass valve, as required, and thereafter, if that is insufficient, open the inlet valve, IV, of a particular compressor, as represented by step 104 in Figure 2. With reference to Figure 3, there is illustrated the flow chart of the routine followed by a "lag" compressor, as executed by the microcontroller 32 associated with each compressor 20. The routine begins with step 120 which calls for the microcontroller 32 to look for the IV position (of the lead compressor) in the value buffer. In decision step 122 the microcontroller 32 ascertains whether data is present in a value buffer (not shown) from PC 34. If no data is present in the value buffer, the control routine proceeds to step 124 to evaluate whether 20 seconds have expired between the last data sent to the value buffer. If 20 seconds have not expired, the routine returns to step 120 and will continue to do so until either data is present, or the 20 seconds have expired. If 20 seconds have expired, step 124 will lead to the subroutine D, to be described subsequently. If, after the step 122, it is ascertained that data is present in the value buffer of the microcontroller, step 126 evaluates whether the inlet valve (IV) position of the leading compressor is greater than the inlet valve (IV) position of the lag compressor. If step 126 results in a yes answer, the routine proceeds to step 128 which asks whether the compressor controlled by microcontroller 32 is at CLH (current limit high). This step ascertains whether the lag compressor is already fully loaded so that any further adjustments in the IV of the lag compressor are futile, since the microcontroller will not allow such adjustments to be made. Therefore, if the lag compressor is indeed at its high limit current level, and the comparison yields a affirmative decision, the routine returns to step 120. If the comparison at step 128 determines that the lag compressor being checked by its own microcontroller is not at CLH, the routine goes on to step 130, in which the microprocessor increases the internal set point pressure by .1 psig every 3 seconds until the desired valve position is achieved. If the comparison at step 126 indicates that the IV position of the lead compressor is less than the IV position of the lag compressor, a no decision leads to step 134 which compares the IV position of the lead compressor with the IV position of the lag compressor to determine whether the lead compressor IV position is less than the IV position of the lag compressor. If this comparison results in a yes decision, the routine proceeds to step 136 where a decision is made about the throttling of the lag compressor. If the determination that a lag compressor is at its CLL limit (i.e. it is at its minimum load state) is made, the routine jumps to step 120. A no decision leads to step 138 where the internal system pressure set point is decreased point 1 psig every three seconds until the desired valve position is achieved. At the conclusion of the routine in step 138, the program returns to step 120. If the comparison executed at step 136 yields an affirmative decision, the routine proceeds back to step 120 to reexecute the routine. If the decision at step 134 yields a negative conclusion, the program loops back to the beginning step 120 of this routine. It was noted that if the comparison at step 124 yields a yes answer, the routine proceeds to step D which calls, at step 140, for a comparison whether the particular lag compressor is at its minimum load point, namely CLL (current limit low). If the decision is affirmative, no further adjustments are made and the routine returns to step 120. If, however, it is determined at step 140 that the lag compressor is not at CLL (i.e. there is a further adjustment possible) the negative decision at this point will lead to step 142 which calls for the decrease of the internal system pressure set point by .1 psig every three seconds until the internal system set point for pressure equals the set point for the pressure established on a control panel (not shown) of microcontroller 32. At the conclusion of the adjustment process in step 142, the routine returns to the beginning of the loop at step 120. With reference now to Figure 4, there is illustrated the routine by which PC 34 (see Figure 1) communicates the position of the IV (inlet valve) of the lead compressor to the lagging compressors. The routine commences with step 150 in which the PC 34 polls the lead compressor for its IV position. Subsequently, at step 152, the program in PC 34 asks the lag compressor for its IV (inlet valve) and BV (bypass valve) position. Once this data has been determined, the routine proceeds to step 154 where it is determined whether the load sharing system is in operation. If it is not, the routine returns to step 150. If, however, the load sharing system is active the routine proceeds to step 156 where the program determines whether the BV (bypass valve) of the lag compressor is opened. If it is opened, (which indicates that no further adjustments of the inlet valve of the lag compressor are possible), the routine loops back to step 150 so that the compressor is not forced into a surge condition. If, on the other hand, the BV (bypass valve) of the lag compressor is not opened (thereby indicating that further adjustments of the IV (inlet valve) are possible), the program proceeds to step 158 which then communicates to the lag compressor the position of the IV (inlet valve) of the lead compressor. This transmittal of the lead compressor inlet valve position to the microcontroller of the lag compressor will cause the microcontroller of the lag compressor to adjust, i.e. modulate, the inlet valve position of the lag compressor to match the inlet valve position of the lead compressor. With reference to Figures 5A and 5B, a typical cycle of both inlet valve and bypass valve positions in a particular compressor are described. With reference now to Figures 6A-6F, the various steps in a load sharing routine are shown by a series of flow charts. As illustrated in Figure 6A, the routine commences with step 160 which determines whether the system air pressure is less than the system alarm pressure so that corrective action may be taken. If the decision at step 160 yields a negative answer (i.e. the actual pressure is above the alarm pressure), the routine proceeds to step 162 which determines whether any compressors are "unloaded". If the routine at step 162 determines that a particular one, or several, compressors are unloaded (as defined above) the routine proceeds to step D, to be describe below. If the comparison at step 162 determines that no compressor is unloaded, the routine proceeds to step 164 which determines whether any compressor, or compressors, are bypassing i.e. have their bypass valves open, even partly so. If its determined in step 164 that the bypass valve of any compressor, or compressors, are open, the routine proceeds to step E to be subsequently described. If the determination at step 164 yields a negative result, the routine loops back to commence step 160. If the determination at step 160 is affirmative, the routine proceeds to step 166 to determine whether any compressors are unloaded. If the decision is affirmative, after step 166, the routine proceeds to step B, to be described below. If the routine at step 166 determines that there are no unloaded compressors, the routine proceeds to step 168 to determine whether any compressors are ready. If the decision after step 168 is affirmative, the routine proceeds to step C, to be described below, while if the results of step 168 are negative, the routine proceeds to loop back to step 160. With reference to Figure 6B, there is illustrated the routine of the program which is called by an affirmative decision in step 166 of Figure 6A. The routine of Figure 6A has determined that system pressure is below the alarm level and has determined that any one (or more) of the system compressors is running unloaded. To prevent premature loading of a compressor in response to momentary, brief, fluctuations in the system pressure which can pass quickly, the routine in Figure 6B, starts with step 170 to determine whether a timer (not shown) is on. If a load timer has been started (to delay the start of loading a compressor), the routine proceeds to step 172 and will not proceed to step 174, to load the compressor, until the load timer has counted down to zero. Until such time, the program will loop back to step 160 in Figure 6A. If the load timer, whose timing can be adjusted to suit a given facility, has counted down, the routine proceeds to step 174 to load a compressor by, first, closing the bypass valve, and second, after the bypass valve has closed, opening the inlet valve of a given compressor. If, after execution of step 170, it is determined that the load timer is not on, the routine proceeds next to step 176 where it is determined whether the system pressure (Pact) is less than the emergency pressure for the system, which is set to be below the alarm pressure. If the results of step 176 are affirmative, i.e. the system pressure is below the emergency pressure, step 180 starts a load timer 180 which is loaded at half the contents of the load timer when the system pressure is not less than the emergency pressure. With reference to Figure 6C, there is illustrated the routine used for starting a compressor if, in accordance with Figure 6A, the routine there described has failed to find any unloaded compressors. The routine in Figure 6C, having found no unloaded compressors by the routine shown in Figure 6A, now commences, in step 182, to determine whether the start timer is on. If it is, the routine proceeds to step 184 to determine whether the start timer is over; if not, the routine returns to step 160 shown in Figure 6A. If the result from step 184 is in the affirmative, a compressor is started in step 186 and a thirty minute stop delay timer is also activated in step 188, after which the program returns to step 160, in Figure 6A. While the routine in step 188 is described with reference to a thirty minute period, this time interval can be selectively adjusted by the user of the system to be greater, or smaller, than thirty minutes. If the results of step 182 are negative, the routine proceeds to step 190 where an inquiry is made about system pressure and its relationship to the emergency pressure set point of the system. Depending upon the results of step 190, the routine proceeds either to step 192 to start a start timer, or it proceeds to step 194 by starting a more rapidly counting start timer so that the compressor can be started with less of a start timer delay. With reference, now, to Figure 6D, there is illustrated the routine which follows an affirmative determination from step 162, shown in Figure 6A. If, in accordance with the routine described in Figure 6A, system pressure is not below the alarm level, and the routine of Figure 6A, has identified, in step 162, that some compressors are unloaded such compressors are targets for being taken off line. However, the routine in Figure 6D prevents an immediate shutdown of the compressor until certain timing intervals have elapsed. If the results of the routine, after execution step 196 are negative, the routine proceeds to step 202 to determine whether or not the stop delay timer, started at step 188 of Figure 6C, is over. If it is not, the routine prevents the start up of a stop timer and instead loops back to step 160 of Figure 6A. If however, the stop delay has expired, the routine proceeds to step 204 where a stop timer is started. Not until the stop time is over, as determined by step 198, does the routine proceed to step 200 and stop the compressor. In step 196, the routine determines whether the stop timer is on, and, if it is, proceeds to step 198 to determine whether the stop timer is over, i.e. has counted out. If the results of step 198 are affirmative, step 200 executes a stop compressor routine, after which the program loops back to step 160 shown in Figure 6A. If the stop timer is not over, step 198 will return the routine also to step 160 in Figure 6A. With reference now to Figure 6E, there is shown the routine which is called into play after an affirmative decision in step 164 shown in Figure 6A. It may be recalled that step 164 has determined that one or more compressors are operating with their bypass valves open, thus "wasting" air. Compressors which are running with bypass valves open are candidates to be unloaded and possibly removed from the system. If the result of step 206 is negative, the routine proceeds to step 210 to determine whether the setting of the bypass valve, BV, exceeds a user selectable set point of BV max. If the result of having performed step 210 is in the affirmative, step 212 starts the unload timer which precedes any step to step F, a further step in the unloading of a compressor. If the result in step 210 is negative, the program loops back to step 160 of Figure 6A. As shown in Figure 6E, step 206 determines whether the unload timer is on (and counting to time out). If it is, the routine proceeds to step 208 to determine whether the unload timer has timed out. If it has not, the routine returns to step 160 of Figure 6A, and if it has, the routine proceeds to step F, to be subsequently described. With reference now to Figure 6F, there shown the routine following an affirmative decision as a result of step 208 shown in Figure 6E. If the unloaded timer is over, step 208 goes to routine F, which commences with step 214. Step 214 determines whether the bypass valve is set beyond the unload point. If it is, step 216 unloads the compressor and the routine returns to step A, shown in Figure 6A. If step 214 has determined that the bypass valve of a particular compressor is set below the unload point, step 218 determines whether a one minute (which may be selectively set by the user to some other time interval) timer is over. If it is not, the routine returns to step A of Figure 6A, while if the decision is affirmative, step 220 will start a one minute timer, which, upon its timing out, decreases the set point pressure of that particular compressor by 1 psig in step 222. Thereafter, the routine returns to step A shown in Figure 6A, and continued execution of routine F will eventually put the bypass valve above its unload point so as to result in a yes decision in step 214. It is noted, as previously observed, that the set point pressure for the machine being unload tested at this stage of a compressor process, is reduced by causing its microcontroller to increase the opening of the bypass valve.

Claims: A compressed air system comprising a plurality of centrifugal compressors (20a-20c), each one having an inlet valve (22a-22c) and a bypass valve (24a-24c); means for storing compressed air at a predetermined system pressure, the compressed air storage means being disposed in fluid receiving relation with the plurality of centrifugal compressors; at least one control means for controlling a set point pressure for each centrifugal compressor; means for sensing the system pressure communicating with said at least one control means; characterised by means for identifying a predetermined centrifugal compressor (20a-20c) to be unloaded from the compressed air system, the identifying means having a logic routine which ranks each centrifugal compressor with respect to the total time of compressor operation, and wherein the logic routine determines the lowest ranked centrifugal compressor having a bypass valve (24a-24c) which has a position exceeding the bypass valve maximum position set point, and identifies said centrifugal compressor as the centrifugal compressor to be unloaded; and computer means for testing the identified centrifugal compressor to determine whether said centrifugal compressor should be unloaded from the compressed air system, the computer means communicating with said at least one control means and including a timing means which is activated upon identifying said predetermined centrifugal compressor, and whereupon deactivation, the computer means causes said at least one control means to decrease the set point pressure of said compressor to prevent a surge event from occurring in said compressor. A compressed air system, according to claim 1, and wherein if during a time period which is determined by the timing means the position of the bypass valve (24a-24c) of the identified compressor becomes equal to or less than the bypass valve maximum position set point, the timing means is reset. A method, in a compressed air system having a plurality of centrifugal compressors (20a-c), each one having an inlet valve (22a-22c) and a bypass valve (24a-24c), the centrifugal compressors supplying compressed air to a storage vessel at a predetermined system pressure, unloading a predetermined centrifugal compressor from the compressed air system characterised by the following steps: establishing a pressure set point for each operating centrifugal compressor (20a-c); establishing a bypass valve (24a-24c) maximum position for each centrifugal compressor; ranking each centrifugal compressor with respect to the total time of compressor operation; determining the position of each bypass valve (24a-24c); comparing the position of each bypass valve to a respective bypass valve maximum position; identifying a centrifugal compressor having the lowest rank and a bypass valve position greater than its bypass valve maximum position as a centrifugal compressor to be unloaded; activating a timer having a predetermined timing period upon identifying the centrifugal compressor to be unloaded; resetting the timer if at any time during the timing period the bypass valve position of the identified centrifugal compressor is equal to or less than the bypass valve maximum position; and upon deactivation of the timer, decreasing the set point pressure of the identified centrifugal compressor in a manner which prevents a surge event from occurring in said compressor. A method according to claim 3, wherein the set point pressure of the identified centrifugal compressor is decreased by 1 PSIG (6.895 kN/m 2 gauge) per minute until the bypass valve is above the set point pressure. A method according to claim 3, wherein the system comprises a stop timer having a predetermined timing period, the method comprising the additional step of actuating the stop timer and stopping the identified compressor after expiration of the predetermined time period when the bypass valve of the identified compressor is positioned in a predetermined unload position. A method according to claim 5, further including the step of establishing a system alarm pressure. A method according to claim 6, wherein the method further comprises the step of determining whether any compressors are running unloaded when the compressed air system pressure is less than a system alarm pressure.

Inventors: FISHER ALVIN J, KINCER DANIEL E, SMOOT TROY S, FISHER, ALVIN J., KINCER, DANIEL E., SMOOT, TROY S.
Applicants: INGERSOLL RAND CO, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
Application year: 1993
Main classification: G05B19
IPC codes: G05B19, G05B15, F04B49, F04D27