A METHOD AND AN ARRANGEMENT FOR FRAME DETECTION QUALITY ESTIMATION IN THE RECEIVER OF A RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Abstract: A method and an arrangement for quality estimation when detecting an information frame, for instance a speech frame transmitted in a radio communication system in accordance with time division multiple access (TDMA), although the method can also be applied with frequency divided radio systems. There is used the soft information available in the radio receiver (RM, DM, DI, KD) which is intended to detect the speech frame and process this signal information in accordance with those principles applicable to known neural nets. Prior to use, the neural net (NT) is aligned to the radio communication system concerned. The invention enables better information relating to possible error in the speech frame to be delivered to error correcting units (TD) in the radio receiver.

Description: A METHOD AND ANARRANGEMENT FOR FRAME DETECTIONQUALITY ESTIMATION IN THE RECEIVER OF A RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a method of achieving improved quality estimation when detecting information frames, and particularlywhendetectingerroneous speech frames inconjunction with channel decoding and subseqeunt speech decoding in the receiver of a radio communication system which operates, for instance, with time divisionmultiple access (so-called TDMA) . The inventive method, however, can also be used with frequency division radio systems (FDMA) . The invention also relates to an arrangement in a radio station using the method. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In a radio system which operates with time division multiple access (e.g. TDMA) , data messages and control messages are transmitted in bursts over certain time slots between primary station (base station) and one or more secondary stations (mobiles) . The primary and the secondary station both have a transmitter and a receiver side. The transmitter side includes a speech coder, channel coder and a modulator. The receiver side includes corresponding units, namely a demodulator, channel decoder and speech decoder. Speech to be transmitted from, for instance, a secondary station (mobile) to a base station is speech-coded in the transmission side of the secondary station and is divided into speech frames prior to channel coding and transmission in the form of bursts in accordance with the access method (TDMA) concerned. For instance, the speech coded signals may be divided in speech frames (which are not the same as the TDMA-frames) with coded speech samples and transmitted in accordance with a given access method (TDMA) . For instance, the speech can be divided in speech frames each of 20 ms. This gives 160 samples at a sampling rate of 8 kHz, which in turn gives 260 bits/speech frames at a speech coding rate of 13 kbit/s. The speech frames are coded in the channel coder in accordance with a given code, which may be a block code or a convolution code. Some of the bits in a speech frame are more sensitive, i.e. carry more important information and it is thus more important that these bits can be received correctly. These more sensitive bits can be protected, by adding redundant parity bits in the channel coder. These redundant bits can be used for error detection and/or error correction of bit errors later on in the receiver. The so-called bit error rate (i.e. quality) of a received message, e.g. a speech frame, may also be estimated in the receiver. When a bit-containing frame is received, the channel decoder uses the redundant bits to correct the most sensitive bits. If it is not possible to correct bit errors, it is necessary to indicate that the whole bit contents of the speech frame (or a part of a speech frame) is bad, i.e. erroneous. When decoding speech in the receiver (speech synthesis) , a bad frame can result in greatly impaired speech. The most sensitive, or susceptible, bits belong to such frame parameters as amplifica¬ tion and spectral distribution. When errors occur in bits which represent these parameters, the decoded and outgoing speech will be heavily distorted by slamming sound and disturbing noise. One method of improving the subjective quality in a digital cellular system in which, for instance, fading distorts a complete speech frame, is to take action so as to reduce the speech distortion. One example of such action is to repeat the previously received error-free speech frame parameters and/or introduce limitations of the speech frame parameters. To the same end, it is also known to introduce a so-called BFI (Bad Frame Indicator) into the channel decoder of the cellular radio system GSM (Global System for Mobile Communication) . This gives an indication in the form of a binary signal to the speech decoder on the receiver side, which denotes whether a frame error has occurred or not. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In order to achieve good properties regarding the aforesaid known measures of improving the subjective speech quality, it is necessary to achieve good and accurate estimation of the quality of the speech frame data received. For instance, the error indication given by the bad frame indicator, BFI, used in the GSM- system is too coarse, since the BFI only gives a logic "1" for an error-free frame and a logic "0" for a bad or erroneous frame. Frame detection which is more bit selective, i.e. detection which indicates more precisely those parts of a frame which contain erroneous bits, would greatly improve the speech quality. Furthermore, the BFI itself may be erroneous. Error-free frames which are detected as being erroneous, and similarly non-detected erroneous frames,- will impair the possibilities of taking error- correcting measures in the subsequent speech decoding process (the speech synthesis) . The aforesaid earlier known error detecting block code neces¬ sitates the addition of redundant bits to the speech data bits, which means that the bit rate must be increased. When the number of redundant bits is reduced, the block code becomes too weak to provide satisfactory error detection. Another known method, on which the present method is based, involves the use of so-called soft information in frame error indicating processes. These values are already available to the detection process, and hence no additional parameters or bits which are able to influence the bit rate, such as when using block codes are inserted. However, the sole use of soft information in the error-indicating process, as is earlier known, does not provide the improvement that is provided with the use of block codes. The correlation between soft information and bit errors is often not sufficiently high for the frames received. Furthermore, the correlation varies with different types of channels. The metrics from a so-called Viterbi decoder in the receiver consti¬ tute an example of soft information. The present invention relates to a method in a radio receiver of improvingthequalityestimationwhendetecting information frames (speech or data) , by using the soft information that is available in the receiver signal path in conjunction with a so-called neural net, with the purpose of obtaining an error indication which is " better and more accurate that the indication given, for instance, by the aforesaid bad frame indicator (BFI) . Such neural nets are known per se, but are applied here in a radio receiver for providing improved quality estimation of received information frames (speech or data) in a simple fashion. The proposed method can also be applied to achieve improved quality estimation of parts of a speech frame, for instance a given block or a part of a given block within a speech frame. The inventive method and the inventive arrangement have the characterizing features set forth in the following Claims. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The invention will now be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which Figure 1 illustrates the configuration of a speech frame; Figure 2 is a block schematic which illustrates the receiver side of a radio station in which the inventive method is applied; Figure 3 illustrates in more detail a simplified neural net used in the receiver side shown in Figure 2; and Figure 4 is a block schematic which illustrates the transmitter- receiver side of a radio station of the same kind as that shown in Figure 2 for training a neural net. BEST MODES OF CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Shown at the top of Figure 1 is the configuration of a speech fram which contains originally 260 bits in accordance with what iu prescribed in the GSM-recommendation, this speech frame beinguse in the illustrated embodiment solely by way of example. The speech frame is divided into three blocks of which eac defines one of three different classes. One block of 50 bits i assigned to class la, one block of 132 bits is assigned to clas lb, and the remaining block of 78 bits is assigned to class 2. Th 260 bits are delivered from the speech coder and form the digiti zed speech after speech coding. A further speech frame of thi kind is available after 20 ms, which results in a net bit rate o 13 kbit/s. Class la: The block of bits (50 bits) which are most sensitive to transmission error and which can cause the most difficult consequences with regard to the intelligibility of the transmitted and decoded speech. When errors are found in these bits, large parts of the immediately preceding, correct speech frame are repeated (downtoning) as described in GSM Recommendation 06.11. This error detection is effected with the aid of three parity bits which are added to the 50 data bits as control bits. Class lb: The block of bits (132 bits) which is not protected by parity bits. Four bits are added as so-called tail bits. These 132 data bits are not equally as sensitive with regard to the intel¬ ligibility to transmission bit errors occurring as the bits in class la. A convolution code is used on the bits included in the class la, lb blocks and the three parity bits and four tail bits. Class 2: These 78 bits are the least susceptible bits and are not protected at all by additional bits, as in the case of class la and lb. The three blocks in a speech frame thus contains 50+132+78=260 bits apart from the 3+4=7 parity bits. Of the 260 bits, 53+136=189 bits are convolution coded with the rate =1/2; i.e. further 189 bits are added. Thus, a speech frame from the channel coder will include a total of 378 + 78 = 456 coded bits, which can be interleaved for inclusion in a plurality of physical TDMA-frames in a known manner. Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating that part of a radio receiver for time division multiple access (e.g. TDMA) with which the inventive method is concerned, and also shows an arrangement according to the present invention. An antenna A of the receiver of a mobile telephone apparatus, for instance, receives radio signals over a certain radio channel. The . signals (data/speech messages) transmitted over this channel may become strongly distorted, for instance due to fading, so that the TDMA-bursts give rise to a highly distorted speech frame. Demodulation takes place in the radio receiver RM at a given radio frequency (in the GSM-system 865-935 MHz) in a known manner, so as to obtain a baseband modulated signal. The level of the radio signals incoming to the radio receiver RM can be measured and are referenced s in Figure 2. m The basebandmodulated signal is demodulated in the demodulator DM within the IF-range, this demodulator also including an equalizer for compensating or correcting the multipath propagation to which the incoming signal has been subjected during transmission, in a known manner. In this regard, the signal can be equalized by means of a Viterbi equalizer in a known manner, for instance the manner described in Swedish Patent Application 9102611-2. So-called soft information is obtained from the equalizer in the demodulator DM, this soft information being available and referenced s. in Figure 2. This soft information may consist particularly of the information obtained subsequent to a first preliminary equalization of thebaseband signal in accordancewith WO-A 91/06165. A deinterleaver DI is connected downstream of the demodula¬ tor/equalizer DM and recovers the time divided bursts intended for the receiver, in a known manner. The main function of the channel decoder KD is to perform the opposite to the operation performed by the channel coder on the transmitter side, i.e. to recover transmitted information fromthe known redundant bits and the known channel coding (e.g. a con- volution code) . The channel decoder KD may also estimate the bit error rate (BER) , for instance by decoding the received and decoded information bits and comparing the result with the bits received from the deinterleaver DI. The difference constitutes a measurement of the bit error rate. The channel decoder KD also provides a measurement as to how bad, or erroneous, a full speech frame is, so-called bad frame indicator BFI. As before mentioned, this magnitude is specified in the GSM-recommendation 05.05. Thus, there can be recovered from the channel decoder KD a signal ε, b which is a measurement of the bit error rate (BER) in the received demodulated and equalized radio signal, and a signal s which indicates whether an error has occurred in the class la-block. The decoded speech frames are delivered from the channel decoder KD to the speech decoder TD in a known manner, speech-frame by speech-frame, where a complete synthesis of received speech frames is effected so as to deliver speech signals to a sound reproduc¬ tion unit H in the secondary station (mobile telephone apparatus) . According to the proposed invention, a so-called neural net NT is arranged on the receiver side of the secondary station, this net coacting with the speech decoder TD, with the purpose of obtaining a better and more accurate estimation of the quality of the received speech frames than that which can be obtained with the aforesaid frame indicator BFI, for instance. The neural net NT receives one or more of the soft value parameters s , s. and s. deriving from the radio receiver RM, the equalizer m j b demodulator DM and the channel decoder KD respectively. Although not shown, the calculated indicator BFI can be used as an input value to the neural net NT. Figure 3 illustrates an example of a neural net NT that can be used on the receiver side illustrated in Figure 2. In this case, the neural net has three inputs v , v , v . Each of these inputs is connected to a summator Sll, S21 and S31 and each of these summators receives the connections from remaining inputs. Thus, the summator Sll receives the connections from the inputs v and v in addition to receiving the connection from input v . Although not shown, there is provided in each of the connections a multiplier which multiplies respective input signals by a factor wi . in accordance with the following: k,3 Index i discloses the layers of the neural net, so that in the first layer (i = 1) , the input signal v is multiplied by the factor w and this multiplied signal is led to the summator Sll; wl 11 and this multiplied signal is led to the summator S12; 2 ^ 12 w and this multiplied signal is led to the summator S13. Correspondingly, the input signal v is multiplied by the factors 1 1 . 1 w „„ , w _ and w „ 21 22 23 prior to these signals being delivered to respective summators Sll , S21 and S31. Correspondingly, the input signal v is multiplied by the factors w „ „ , w „ „ and w _ , 31 ' 32 33 prior to these signals being delivered to respective summators Sll, S21 and S31. Limiters Lll, L21 and L31 are connected to respective summators Sll, S21, S31 for limiting the level of respective summator output signals. These limiters conveniently have the form of non-linear stages with hyperbolic transmission functions, for instance tanh- f nctions. The neural net illustrated in Figure 3 has three layers, three nodes in the first two layers and a single output node. Naturally, it is also possible to increase (or decrease) the number of layers and nodes and to use more than one output from the network. The network may optionally be supplemented with pre-processing units PP1-PP3 (the broken line blocks in Figure 3) . For instance, the pre-processing procedure may constitute lowpass filtration, normalization to a given level, the formation of an average value of a given number of bits beneath a given bit interval, variants estimation, and combinations of these measures. The inputs v,-v Λ receive, for instance, the magnitudes s , s. and 1 3 ~ s. according to Figure 2. These are multiplied by respective f b actors w1, . in accordance with the above, and summated in the summators S11-S31. Respective summation values are then delivered to the respective non-linear limiter Lll, L21 and L31. The output magnitudes , u and u from respective limiters are then 1 1 1 1 u χ = f [ (v χ • w χι + v 2 • 21 + v 3 • w 31 ) - b λ ] 1 1 1 1 u 2 = f [( Vl • w 12 + v 2 • w 22 + v 3 • w 32 ) - b 2 ] 1 1 1 u 3 - f [( Vl • w 13 + v 2 . Wz3 + V3 . W33) _ b3 - where the function f is the transmission function of each of the non-linear limiters L11-L31 (assumed the same) . As an example, the function can be chosen as f(x) = tanhx and where b. is a constant. Multiplication, summation and non-linear operation and limitation of the magnitudes u -u are carried out in an analogous manner, these magnitudes now forming input magnitudes to the second layer in the neural net. The simplified neural net illustrated in Figure 3 can be expanded to any desired number of levels and any desired number of nodes n , as described in R.P. Lippmann "An introduction to computing m with neural nets", IEEE ASSP Magazine, April 1987. In the simpli- fied case illustrated in Figure 3, m = 3 n 3 - l The proposed neural net enables a better boundary separation of the decision regions of the various soft values. The achievement of this is a non-linear problem which requires a non-linear solution, and since the decision functions of the neural net (the units Sll, S21, ...) are non-linear, this constitutes a suitable solution to this problem. However, in order for the neural net illustrated in Figure 3 to improve the quality at which a frame error is indicated, the net must first be trained, i.e. it is first necessary to determine i i suitable values of the parameters w . , b , which are then to be _\ . k used in the neural net for receiving signals over a virtual radio channel. Figure 4 is a block schematic of the transmitting and the recei¬ ving side of a radio station, for instance a mobile telephone apparatus, and illustrates how alignment of the neural net is achieved. It is assumed by way of example that the radio station transmits and receives time multiplexed signals with multiple access (TDMA) , although the neural net can also be applied in a system in which coded time multiplexed signals with multiple access, so-called CDMA-signals are transmitted/received. The transmitter side includes a speech coder TK, a channel coder KK, a block MD which includes the baseband modulator and the TDMA- interleaver, and also a radio transmitter RS which transmits a radio signal (the 900 MHz-band for GSM) to the antenna of the radio station. All of the aforesaid units are known to the art. In the illustrated case, the output of the radio transmitter RS is connected to a simulator CH which simulates a radio channel with regard to fading, time dispersion, attenuation, etc. The receiver side of the radio station includes those units previously described with reference to Figure 2, namely the radio receiver RM, the demodulator with equalizer and deinterleaver referenced DMI, the channel decoder KD and the speech decoder TD. All of these units are known and need not be described in detail here. Those units included in the block schematic shown in Figure 4 and functioning to align "the neural net NT are a comparator JF, a difference former (summator) S and a calculating unit SP. One input of the comparator JF is connected to the output of the speech coder TK over which the desired speech coded signal is obtained. The other input is connected to the input of the speech coder on the receiver side over which there occurs the speech signal which was disturbed over the radio channel CH but at least partially corrected in the receiver. The two signals delivered to the comparator inputs both occur in the form of speech frames (Figure 1) . The output signal s of the comparator JF represents a BFI-value which is characteristic for the transmitter-receiver used and which is the BFI-value that can be expected when using one such type of radio station in a virtual channel case. It is this BFI- value which shall be improved by means of the neural net. The neural net NT is therefore connected in the manner illustrated in Figure 3, with its three inputs connected in the manner described earlier with reference to Figure 2 and with its output s connected to the input of the difference former S, the other n input of which receives the output signal s . This output signal thus forms the difference between a) a signal s which indicates the value of the frame error that is obtained without using the neural net and which thus constitutes a real value, and b) a signal s which denotes the improved quality value of the frame error n indication desired, i.e. a set-point or control value. The difference between the signals s. and s produces an error f n signal e which is delivered to the calculating unit SP. This unit calculates the values of the parameters w . and b in different 3 ik k calculating steps as a function of the error e concerned and in dependence on the values of the parameters wij,k and bik calcu¬ lated in preceding calculating steps, and the error e as described in the aforesaid reference to Lippmann (see in particular page 17). The aforesaid alignment of the neural net can be effected in conjunction with trimming respective stationary units and may be a relatively complicated procedure which requires some time to carry out. The neural net, however, is relatively simple in itself and causes no unnecessary complication of the receiver side in practice when training of the neural net has been completed. The proposed method is unable to rectify errors in the speech frames and is also unable to improve directly the error correction performed in the receiver. However, the method does provide a freer appraisal of an error when receiving the speech frames than that afforded, for instance, by the known BFI:n, and therewith 0938 PCI7SE93/00476 functions to supply better error information to the erro correcting units, primarily to the speech decoder, which results in better speech quality.

Claims: 00938 PCI7SE93/00476 CLAIMS 1. In a radio communication system in which radio signals are transmitted between a primary station and one or more secondary stations (MS) in accordance with a given access method (TDMA) a method of estimating the quality of an information frame transmit¬ ted in accordance with the access method (TDMA) concerned in order to provide a better estimation with regard to a possible frame error ^ when decoding at least a part of the information frame subsequent to detection and correction in accordance with an error detecting and/or error correcting code, c h a r a c t e r i z e d by recovering soft information in the form of a number of signal values from the radio signal incoming to the receiver side of a primary or secondary station and processed after certain receiver stages, and by a) multiplying each of all recovered signal values with predeter¬ mined coefficients (w. , ) ; 3,k b) summing all recovered and according to a) multiplied signal values by one another to form a given number n of summation values; c) effecting a non-linear operation (Lll-Lln, L21-L2n, ...) on each of the summation values obtained according to b) , wherein the same number n new values are obtained; and d) evaluating at least one of the thus obtained values to obtain a measurement of said quality. 2. A method according to Claim 1, c h a r a c t e r i z e d by repeating steps a)-c) a given number m (m > 1) of times prior to effecting the evaluation according to d)-. 3. A method according to Claim 2, c h a r a c t e r i z e d by varying said number n of summation values from the time at which the steps a)-c) have been carried out once until all steps have again been carried out. /00938 PCI7SE93/00476 4. A method according to Claim 1 or 2, c h a r a c t e r i z e d bbyy ssuubbttrraaccttiinngg pprreeddeetteerrmmiinneedd ccoonnssltants (b ) from each of these values in conjunction with step c) 5. A method according to any one of the preceding Claims, c h a r a c t e r i z e d by combining the measurement of quality (S ) obtained subsequent to said evaluation with a measurement (s ) of the same qualitymeasured in the radio receiver in the same way. 6. A method according to Claim 4, c h a r a c t e r i z e d by combining said evaluated qualitymeasurement with the same quality measurement calculated in the receiver side, in accordance with a binary "OR ,, -function. 7. A method according to any one of the preceding Claims, cha ra cter i z ed by determining said soft information from one or more bit error rates (BER) estimated by the decoding matrix of the receiver side, the signal strength of the demodulator output signal, estimated phase error in the demodulator, the level of the incoming radio signal, and CRC-flags. 8. An arrangement in a radio station included in a radio co - munication system which includes a first radio unit (RM) which produces a measurement of the level of the radio signal incoming to the receiver, a second radio unit (DM) which produces a measurement of the degree of equalization when demodulating the radio signal delivered from the first radio unit, and a third radio unit (KD) which produces a measurement of the receiving quality of the signal delivered from the second radio unit, c h a r a c t e - r i z e d by a neural net (NT) having at least two layers (m = 2) and at least two nodes (n = 2) , wherein the two inputs of the m neural net (NT) belonging to said at least two nodes are intended to receive said measurement from at least two of said radio units and to deliver an output signal to a fourth radio unit (TD) in the receiving side of the radio station, said fourth radio unit functioning to evaluate this output signal with the intention o improving its function.

Inventors: LUNDQVIST NILS PATRICK, MINDE TOR BJOERN, WAHLBERG ULF TORSTENSSON, LUNDQVIST, NILS, PATRICK, MINDE, TOR, BJOERN, WAHLBERG, ULF, TORSTENSSON
Applicants: ERICSSON TELEFON AB L M, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON
Application year: 1993
Main classification: H04L1
IPC codes: H04B7, H04J3, H04L1