RARE EARTH BOND MAGNET, COMPOSITION THEREFOR, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Abstract: A composition for a rare earth bond magnet consists of rare earth magnet powder and resin ingredient, and a magnet whose moldability, performance and corrosion-resistance are improved by adding chelating agent alone or chelating agent and antioxidant to the composition. By controlling the values of the material properties of the composition, troubles when molding the magnet can be suppressed, and the productivity of the magnet can be improved. With respect to a composition for extrusion molding, by using at least two kinds of resin, the moldability can be improved and the amount of production can be increased. Further, by using extrusion molding through cooling and setting and using hot compression molding as the manufacturing method of the magnet, the magnet is endowed with a high density and a high performance.

Description: Technical Field The present invention relates to a rare-earth bonded magnet comprising a rare-earth magnetic powder and a resin component, and more particularly to a rare-earth bonded magnet having a high volume fraction of magnetic powder and thus having high performance, a rare-earth bonded magnet composition for use in the production of the rare-earth bonded magnet. Background Art Rare-earth bonded magnets hitherto been produced by the following methods. 1. Compression molding 2. Injection molding 3. Extrusion molding Compression molding is generally a method wherein a magnet composition comprising a magnetic powder and a thermosetting resin is filled into a mold in a press at room temperature, compressed the composition and heated to cure the resin, thereby molding a magnet. In the case of the compression molding method, since the resin content of the magnet composition is lower than that for the other molding methods, the freedom of shape in molding a magnet is smaller although the magnetic properties of the resultant magnet are superior. Injection molding is a method wherein a magnet composition comprising a magnet power and a resin component is heat-melted to prepare a melt having sufficient fluidity which is then injected into a mold where the melt is molded into a desired shape. In the case of the injection molding, in order to impart sufficient fluidity to the magnet composition, the resin content of the magnet composition is higher than that for the compression molding, resulting in lowered magnetic properties. The freedom in molding, however, is higher than that for the compression molding. Extrusion molding is a method wherein a magnet composition comprising a magnet powder and a resin component is heat-melted to prepare a melt having sufficient fluidity which is then formed into a shape in a die and set by cooling, thereby providing a product having a desired shape. In the extrusion, like the injection molding, the resin content needs to be high enough to impart the magnet composition to fluidity. This method has an advantage that a thin-walled and long magnet can be easily produced. Among the above methods, injection molding and extrusion generally use a thermoplastic resin as the resin. These are disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-Open Nos. 123702/1987, 152107/1987, 194503/1985 and 211908/1985. However, the conventional rare-earth bonded magnet composition comprising a rare-earth magnet powder and a thermoplastic resin, used in the prior art methods, particularly in injection molding and extrusion, has the following problems. Specifically, since the rare-earth magnet powder comprises a transition metal element, such as Fe or Co, when it is mixed and kneaded with a thermoplastic resin to prepare a composition which is then molded, the transition metal element catalytically acts on the resin component and causes an increase in molecular weight of the resin component, which results in a change in properties of the composition, such as an increase in melt viscosity. This suggests a lowering in heat stability of the rare-earth bonded magnet composition. The above phenomenon is partly described in "Journal of The Magnetics Society of Japan, vol. 16, No. 2, 135-138 (1992)," indicating that a composition comprising an Nd-Fe-B-based magnet powder and a polyamide resin, due to the influence of temperature and shearstress, undergoes changes in properties, particularly viscosity. The higher the content of the rare-earth magnet powder in the composition and the larger the specific surface area of the rare-earth magnetic powder, the higher the above tendency. The above phenomenon raises problems including that the phenomenon makes it impossible to produce a rare-earth bonded magnet composition; even though a rare-earth bonded magnet composition could be successfully produced, it cannot be stably molded due to the deterioration during molding; and it is difficult to improve the magnetic properties of the molded magnet. For the rare-earth bonded magnet composition, the relationship between the properties of the composition and the moldability has not been fully clarified particularly in the case of extrusion. Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 162301/1989 discloses a method wherein the viscosity of a molding composition is specified. In this method, however, the viscosity is specified in relation to the magnetic field for alignment. Further, the resin used is a thermosetting resin, and there is no clear description of the properties involved in the moldability, of a magnet composition using a thermoplastic resin. Furthermore, no particular attention is paid to changes in properties of the composition during molding. In actual molding, a change in properties derived from the phenomenon, as described above, occurs in the course of feed of the composition into a mold of the molding machine, which makes it impossible to conduct molding. In the case of injection molding, a sprue and a runner are generated due to the nature of the molding method and should be recycled. The change in properties of the composition renders the recycling difficult, unfavorably increasing the loss of material. This incurs an increase in cost of the rare-earth bonded magnet. In the case of the extrusion, unlike the injection molding, there is little or no need of recycling. Since, however, the operation is carried out in a continuous manner, staying of the composition in an extruder or a die often renders the molding impossible. Further, the deterioration of the composition causes a load to be applied to the machine, which often results in failure of the machine and damage to a screw and a die and a nozzle and the like of the injection molding machine. For the magnet composition used in the extrusion, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 264601/1987 discloses the addition of a lubricant, Japanese Patent Laid-Open Nos. 289807/1988 and 162301/1989 disclose a magnet composition using a thermoplastic resin, and Japanese Patent Application No. 270884/1991 discloses a magnet composition having a specified viscosity. As described above, in the case of the conventional magnet composition for extrusion, the properties in the molten state and additives, such as a lubricant, are taken into consideration. However, no satisfactory consideration is given to a resin component particularly when a thermoplastic resin is used as the resin component. In the production of a rare-earth-resin bonded magnet by extrusion, in order to enhance the magnetic properties of the molded magnet, a very large amount of a magnetic powder is incorporated into the magnet composition, resulting in lowered strength, i.e., melt strength, of the magnet composition in a molten state. Therefore, in the case of the extrusion of the above composition, unlike the extrusion of a general resin, it is impossible to adopt a method wherein a resin is formed into a shape in a die which is then taken off to the outside of the die by means of a take-off device, cooled and sized outside the die to provide a final shape. For this reason, in the extrusion of a magnet composition, it is necessary to adopt a method wherein the composition is formed into a final shape in a die which, as such, is set by cooling at the forward end of the die and extruded to the outside of the die. In this method, the magnet composition, which has been set by cooling at the forward end of the die (hereinafter referred to as "cooling section"), should be extruded. This raises a problem that, when only one resin, particularly a crystalline resin, is used in the magnetic composition, the change from a molten state to a solid state is so rapid that the extrusion cannot be carried out, or the extrusion rate (molding rate) is limited by properties of the resin at a temperature around the melting point thereof. Further, as described above, the rare-earth magnetic powder is highly active enough to deteriorate the resin component during molding, causing the resultant magnet molding to rust by oxidation when it is allowed to stand. Among the above three methods for producing a rare-earth bonded magnet, compression molding can produce magnets having the highest performance. Since, however, a thermosetting resin is employed as the resin, the step of heat-curing the resin must be additionally provided in the molding, so that the properties of the resin at the time of heat setting should be taken into consideration. For this reason, the resin cannot be selected based on the moldability alone, and consequently the kind and amount of the resin and the molding conditions cannot be determined from the viewpoint of the moldability alone. Furthermore, since the resin used is a thermosetting resin, the defective molded body cannot be recycled. EP-A-0405321 discloses a magnet composed mainly of magnetic powders consisting of Nd or Nd and rare earth elements, Fe or Fe and transition metals, and B together with a chelate resin or a mixture of a chelate resin and other synthetic resins. J-A-63-233504 describes a ferromagnetic powder having improved orientation degree obtained by blending polyamide resin with phenol resin and mixing and kneading them with ferromagnetic powder to the molded in a magnetic field while lowering melting viscosity of a molding material. J-A-4-134807 describes obtaining an arc-shaped magnetic by selecting the viscosity eta of the mixture of rare earth magnetic powder resin and additive to be eta <=2k poise (shear rate 1000 sec -1 ) where a resin ingredient is liquified. The present invention provides a solution to the problems discussed previously and an object of the present invention is to provide a high-performance rare-earth bonded magnet with high productivity. Another object of the present invention is to provide rare-earth bonded magnets having various shapes according to the applications thereof. According to one aspect, the present invention provides a rare-earth bonded magnet composition for extrusion, comprising a rare-earth magnetic powder and a thermoplastic resin containing one or more additives selected from chelating agents, antioxidants and lubricants, said composition having a viscosity η1, as measured at 230°C. before charging into an extruder, of 5 kpoise ≤ η1 ≤ 500 kpoise (shear rate: 25 sec -1) and a viscosity η2, as measured upon delivery from the extruder, satisfying a requirement represented by the following formula: 0.3 ≤ η2/η1 ≤ 10. According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a rare-earth bonded magnet composition for injection molding, comprising a rare-earth magnetic powder and a thermoplastic resin containing one or more additives selected from chelating agents, antioxidants and lubricants, said composition having a viscosity η3, as measured at 250°C. before charging into an injection molding machine, of 1 kpoise ≤ η3 ≤ 100 kpoise (shear rate: 1000 sec -1 ) and a viscosity η4, as measured upon delivery from the injection molding machine, satisfying a requirement represented by the following formula 0.3 ≤ η4/η3 ≤ 5. The rare-earth bonded magnet composition according to the present invention contains an additive such as a chelating agent. For example, the rare-earth bonded magnet composition may contain 0.1 to 2.0 wt% of a chelating agent having a phenol structure, Further, the rare-earth bonded magnet composition may contain at least one antioxidant and the chelating agent in a total amount of 0.1 to 2 wt% based on the whole composition. In another embodiment, the rare-earth bonded magnet composition compress at least one antioxidant and a chelating agent having a phenol structure in a total amount of 0.1 to 2 wt% based on the whole composition. These ensure heat stability of the rare-earth bonded magnet composition during kneading and molding, thereby enabling the composition to be stably molded. Further, they enable the volume percent of the magnet powder in the magnet composition to be increased, improving the performance of the molded magnet. Furthermore, they inactivate the rare-earth magnetic powder and, hence, improve the corrosion resistance of the molded magnet. According to the present invention, in a rare-earth bonded magnet composition comprising a rare-earth magnet powder and a polyamide resin, a chelating agent having an amide group may be added thereto in an amount of 0.1 to 2 wt%. Further, at least one antioxidant and a chelating agent having an amide group may be added in a total amount of 0.1 to 2 wt% to the rare-earth bonded magnet composition. These can ensure heat stability and moldability of the magnet composition particularly when a polyamide resin is used as the resin component. The rare-earth bonded of magnet compositions according to the invention reduce the occurrence of machine troubles and the like at the time of extrusion or injection molding, enabling magnets to be produced stably. Further, according to the present invention, in a process for producing a rare-earth bonded magnet comprising a rare-earth magnet powder and a resin component, compression molding in a melting temperature range of the resin component can provide high-density, high-performance rare-earth bonded magnets. Brief Description of the Drawing Fig. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a die structure for extrusion molding used in examples of the present invention. The present invention will now be described with reference to the following examples. Compounding behavior of ingredients observed during the mixing and kneading of each magnetic powder and a thermoplastic resin alone will now be described as Example 1. An experiment was carried out as follows. Each magnetic powder specified in Table 1 and a polyamide resin (nylon 12) were weighed so that the volume fraction of the magnetic powder was 75%. They were then mixed together in a V mixer. 45 g of the mixture was placed in a roller mixer (R-60) mounted on Labo Plastomill (manufactured by Toyo Seiki Seisaku Sho, Ltd.) and milled at a temperature of 230°C and a screw speed of 10 rpm, and the milling torque was measured during the milling operation. The results are given in Table 1. Composition Magnetic powder Time A needed for causing increase in torque (min) Composition 1 Sr ferrite powder >60 Composition 2 Ba ferrite powder >60 Composition 3 SmCo 5 -based powder 12 Composition 4 Sm 2 Co 17 -based powder 14 Composition 5 Nd 2 Fe 14 B-based powder 9 Composition 6 Sm 2 Fe 17 N 3 -based powder 14 In the table, the time A needed for causing increase in torque is a milling time taken for the torque value to become at least three times the torque value one minute after the initiation of milling. As is apparent from the results given in the table, for all the compositions using rare-earth magnetic powder, the time A taken for causing increase in torque was different from and shorter than the compositions using ferritic magnet powders. Both types of compositions exhibited different behaviors also in the change of torque with time. Specifically, for the compositions using ferrite magnetic powders, the torque value was high one minute after the initiation of milling and gradually increased with time but did not become not less than three times the torque value one minute after the initiation of milling. By contrast, the compositions using rare-earth magnet powder exhibited a rapid increase in torque value. The reason for this is considered to reside in that the rare-earth magnet powder has a higher activity than the ferrite magnetic powder and this higher activity leads to an increase in torque, that is, the deterioration of the resin composition. This is true of, besides the polyamide resin as the resin component, thermoplastic resins, such as PPS (polyphenylene sulfide) and a liquid crystalline polymer, PEN (polyethernitrile). The above results show that, unlike the ferrite magnetic powder, the rare-earth magnet powder makes it difficult to ensure the stability of the resultant composition. Example 1: The extrudability and the like of the compositions with the properties being varied by varying the volume percent of the magnetic powder and the amount of the additive were investigated. The results were as follows. An Nd-Fe-B-based quenched magnetic powder (MQP-B manufactured by GM), a polyamide resin, a chelating agent, which was N,N-bis[3-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)] propionylhydrazine (chelating agent 1) antioxidant which was pentaerythrityl-tetrakis[3-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)]propionate, (antioxidant A) and a lubricant were weighed in desired amount ratios and mixed together, and the mixture was then placed in a twin-screw extruder and kneaded at 230°C to prepare various compositions. At that time, the volume percent of the magnetic powder was varied to prepare compositions having varied viscosities. These compositions were placed in a single-screw extruder and extruded at 230 to 270°C to evaluate the moldability. The evaluation of the extrudability was carried out based on whether or not the composition could be successfully extruded into a pipe magnet having an outer diameter of 10 mm and an inner diameter of 8 mm for 10 hours or longer. Viscosity measurements were made with a capillary rheometer before the charge into the extruder and upon delivery from the extruder. The former viscosity was η1, and the latter viscosity was η2. The viscosity was measured under conditions of a temperature of 230°C and a shear rate of 25 sec -1 . The results of evaluation are given in Table 1. Composition Magnet powder (vol%) η1 (kpoise) η2/η1 Extrudability (hr) Composition 1 60 10 0.7 >10 Composition 2 70 120 0.8 >10 Composition 3 75 200 0.8 >10 Composition 4 80 380 1.0 >10 Composition 5 82 450 1.5 >10 Composition 6 84 530 2.0 Impossible to extrude As is apparent from Table 1, when the composition had a viscosity of more than 500 kpoise, it could not extruded. On the other hand, the compositions could be successfully extruded when they had a viscosity of not more than 500 kpoise and a viscosity ratio of not more than 10. From these results, the upper limit of the viscosity at the time of extruding of the composition is 500 kpoise. Magnet Composition Br (kG) iHc (kOe) (BH) max ρ (g/cm 3 ) Magnet 1 Composition 4 7.24 9.58 10.3 6.15 Magnet 2 Composition 5 7.32 9.56 10.5 6.22 The magnetic properties of the extrudates 4 and 5 obtained from the extrudable compositions were measured by VSM. The results are given in Table 2. As is apparent from Table 2, high-performance magnets could be prepared when the properties of the compositions fell within the scope of the present invention. Then, in a composition consisting of an R-Fe-B-based magnet powder, a polyamide resin, chelating agent 1, antioxidant A and a lubricant, the amount of the additive was varied to prepare compositions having varied viscosities which were then evaluated. The results are given in Table 3. In this case, the volume percent of the magnetic powder was kept constant at 60%. All the compositions could be molded without any problem. Composition η1 (kpoise) η2/η1 Crushing strength (kg) Composition 6 3 0.5 3.2 Composition 7 4 0.5 4.1 Composition 8 7 0.7 7.3 Composition 9 10 0.7 10.3 Composition 10 20 0.7 10.2 In Table 3, the crushing strength represents strength as measured by cutting, into a size of 10 mm, a ring magnet, having a size of 10 x 8, prepared by the extrusion and crushing the magnet. As is apparent from Table 3, when the viscosity of the compositions is less than 5 kpoise, the extrudates had lowered mechanical strength although no problem of the extrudability arose. From this, the lower limit of the viscosity of the composition for extrusion is 5 kpoise. Then, in a composition consisting of an Nd-Fe-B-based magnetic powder, nylon 12, chelating agent 1, antioxidant A and a lubricant, the amount of the antioxidant added was varied to prepare compositions having varied ratios of the viscosity η1 before charging into an extruder to the viscosity η2 upon delivery from the extruder. These compositions were evaluated for extrudability and crushing strength. In this case, the volume percent of the magnetic powder was 67%. The results are given in Table 4. The evaluation method was the same as that discribed formerly. Composition η1 (kpoise) η2/η1 Extrudability (hr) Crushing strength (kg) Composition 11 38 0.2 >10 5.0 Composition 12 37 0.3 >10 7.5 Composition 13 36 0.7 >10 10.0 Composition 14 42 1.0 >10 9.8 Composition 15 40 5.3 >10 10.2 Composition 16 40 9.0 >10 11.0 Composition 17 38 11.0 Impossible to extrude - As is apparent from Table 4, when the viscosity ratio η2/η1 was more than 10, it was difficult to extrude the composition due to the deterioration of the composition. On the other hand, when the viscosity ratio was not more than 10, the compositions could be successfully extruded for 10 hours or more. For this reason, the upper limit of the viscosity ratio is 10 from the viewpoint of extrudability. When the viscosity ratio was less than 0.3, the composition could be stably extruded for 10 hours or longer. In this case, however, the mechanical strength of the extrudate was about half of that of the extrudates from the compositions having a viscosity ratio of not less than 0.3, that is, the mechanical strength of the extrudate was lowered. For this reason, the viscosity ratio should not be less than 0.3 from the viewpoint of ensuring the mechanical strength. EXAMPLE 2 The experiment of Example 1 was repeated as Example 7 except that injection molding was carried out instead of the extrusion. An Nd-Fe-B-based quenched magnetic powder (MQP-B manufactured by GM), a polyamide resin, chelating agent 1, antioxidant A and a lubricant were weighed in desired amount ratios and mixed together, and the mixtures was then placed in a twin-screw extruder and compounded at 230°C to prepare various compositions. At that time, the volume percent of the magnetic powder was varied to prepare compositions having varied viscosities. These compositions were placed in an injection molding machine and injection-molded at 250 to 300°C to evaluate the moldability. The moldability was evaluated in terms of recycleability. The magnets prepared by injection molding were in the form of a tile having an outer diameter R of 4.6 mm, an inner diameter r of 3.6 mm, a round angle of 115° and a length of 10 mm. Further, viscosity measurements were made with a capillary rheometer before charging into the molding machine and upon delivery from the injection molding machine. The former viscosity was η3, and the latter viscosity was 74. The viscosity was measured under conditions of a temperature of 250°C and a shear rate of 1000 sec -1 . The results of evaluation are given in Table 5. Composition Magnetic powder (vol%) η3 (kpoise) η4/η3 Recyclability (number of times) Composition 18 60 7 0.7 >10 Composition 19 70 20 0.8 >10 Composition 20 75 70 0.9 >10 Composition 21 77 95 1.0 >10 Composition 22 80 130 2.0 Impossible to mold As is apparent from Table 5, when the composition had a viscosity of more than 100 kpoise, it could not injection-molded. On the other hand, the compositions could be molded when they had a viscosity of not more than 100 kpoise and a viscosity ratio of not more than 5. This is because when the composition has a viscosity of more than 100 kpoise, the fluidity of the composition becomes so low that the composition cannot be injected into a die. From these results, the upper limit of the viscosity at the time of injection molding of the composition is 100 kpoise. Magnet Composition Br (kG) iHc (kOe) (BH) max ρ (g/cm 3 ) Magnet 3 Composition 20 6.92 9.70 9.0 5.88 Magnet 4 Composition 21 7.07 9.69 9.7 6.02 Magnetic properties of the extrudates obtained from the moldable compositions 20 and 21 were measured by VSM. As is apparent from Table 6, high-performance magnets could be prepared when the properties of the compositions fell within the scope of the present invention. Then, in a composition consisting of an R-Fe-B-based magnetic powder, a polyamide resin, chelating agent 1, antioxidant A and a lubricant, the amount of the additive was varied to prepare compositions having varied viscosities which were then evaluated. The results are given in Table 7. In this case, the volume percent of the magnet powder was kept constant at 60%. All the compositions could be molded without any problem. Composition η3 (kpoise) η4/η3 Crushing strength (kg) Composition 23 0.8 0.5 5.0 Composition 24 1.1 0.5 7.5 Composition 25 2 0.6 9.8 Composition 26 5 0.6 9.8 In Table 7, the crushing strength represents strength as measured by crushing a ring magnet, having a size of 10 x 8 x 10t, prepared by the injection molding. As is apparent from Table 7, when the viscosity of the composition is less than 1 kpoise, the ring magnet had lowered mechanical strength although no problem of the moldability arose. From this, the lower limit of the viscosity of the composition for injection molding is 1 kpoise. Than, in a composition consisting of an Nd-Fe-B-based magnetic powder, nylon 12, chelating agent 1, antioxidant A and a lubricant, the amount of the antioxidant added was varied to prepare compositions having varied ratios of the viscosity η3 before charging into the molding machine to the viscosity η4 upon delivery from the molding machine. These compositions were evaluated for moldability and crushing strength. In this case, the volume percent of the magnetic powder was 70%. The results are given in Teble 8. The evaluation method was the same as that in Example 1. Composition η3 (kpoise) η4/η3 Recyclability (number of times) Crushing strength (kg) Composition 27 15 0.2 >10 5.2 Composition 28 16 0.4 >10 8.3 Composition 29 17 0.7 >10 9.7 Composition 30 15 1.0 >10 10.5 Composition 31 16 4.3 >10 10.2 Composition 32 15 5.2 Impossible to mold - As is apparent from Table 8, when the viscosity ratio η4/η3 was more than 5, it was difficult to extrude the composition due to the deterioration of the composition in the molding machine. On the other hand, when the viscosity ratio was not more than 5, the compositions could be recycled more than ten times for molding. For this reason, the upper limit of the viscosity ratio is 5 from the viewpoint of moldability. When the viscosity ratio was less than 0.3, the composition could be recycled more than 10 times for molding. In this case, however, the mechanical strength of the molded body was about half of that of the molded bodies from the compositions having a viscosity ratio of not less than 0.3, that is, the mechanical strength of the extrudate was lowered. For this reason, the viscosity ratio should not be less than 0.3 from the viewpoint of ensuring the mechanical strength. Example 3 The experiment of Example 2 was repeated as Example 3, except that the magnetic powder and the resin component were varied in order to investigate the influence thereof. The Sm-Co-based magnet powder and the liquid crystalline polymer used in Example 6, chelating agent 1, antioxidant A and a lubricant were weighed in desired amount ratios and mixed together, and the mixtures was then placed in a twin-screw extruder and kneaded at 280°C to prepare various compositions. At that time, the volume percent of the magnetic powder was varied to prepare compositions having varied viscosities. These compositions were placed in an injection molding machine and injection-moided at 280 to 300°C to evaluate the moldability. The moldability was evaluated in terms of recycleability. The magnets prepared by injection molding were in the form of a tile having an outer diameter R of 4.6 mm, an inner diameter r of 3.6 mm, a round angle of 115° and a length of 10 mm. Further, viscosity measurements were made with a capillary rheometer before charging into the molding machine and upon delivery from the injection molding machine. The former viscosity was η3, and the latter viscosity was η4. The viscosity was measured under conditions of a temperature of 320°C and a shear rate of 1000 sec -1 . The results of evaluation are given in Table 9. Composition Magnetic powder (voi%) η3 (kpoise) η4/η3 Recyclability (number of times) Composition 33 60 6 0.6 >10 Composition 34 70 21 0.6 >10 Composition 35 72 80 0.7 >10 Composition 36 75 90 0.8 >10 Composition 37 77 130 2.0 Impossible to mold As is apparent from Table 9, when the composition had a viscosity of more than 100 kpoise, it could not be injection-molded. On the other hand, the compositions could be molded when they had a viscosity of not more than 100 kpoise and a viscosity ratio of not more than 5. This is because when the composition has a viscosity of more than 100 kpoise, the fluidity of the composition becomes so low that the composition cannot be injected into a die. From these results, the upper limit of the viscosity at the time of injection molding of the composition is 100 kpoise. Then, in a composition consisting of an Sm-Co-based magnetic powder, a liquid crystalline polymer, chelating agent 1, antioxidant A and a lubricant, the amount of the additive was varied to prepare compositions having varied viscosities which were then evaluated. The results are given in Table 10. In this case, the volume percent of the magnetic powder was kept constant at 60%. All the compositions could be molded without any problem. Composition η3 (kpoise) η4/η3 Crushing strength (kg) Composition 38 0.7 0.5 4.8 Composition 39 1.0 0.5 7.2 Composition 40 3 0.6 9.6 Composition 41 5 0.6 9.5 In Table 10, the crushing strength represents strength as measured by crushing a ring magnet, having a size of 10 x 8 x 10t, prepared by the injection molding. As is apparent from Table 10, when the viscosity of the composition is less than 1 kpoise, the ring magnet had lowered mechanical strength although no problem of the moldability arose. From this, the lower limit of the viscosity of the composition for injection molding is 1 kpoise. Then, in a composition consisting of an Sm-Co-based magnet powder, a liquid crystalline polymer (Vectra (trademark) manufactured by Polyplastics Co., Ltd.), chelating agent 1, antioxidant A and a lubricant, the amount of the additive was varied to prepare compositions having varied ratios of the viscosity η3 before charging into the molding machine to the viscosity η4 upon delivery from the molding machine. These compositions were evaluated for moldability and crushing strength. In this case, the volume percent of the magnetic powder was 70%. The results are given in Table 11. The evaluation method was the same as that in Example 1. Composition η3 (kpoise) η4/η3 Recyclability (number of times) Crushing strength (kg) Composition 42 18 0.2 >10 5.6 Composition 43 18 0.5 >10 8.9 Composition 44 19 0.8 >10 9.9 Composition 45 17 1.5 >10 10.0 Composition 46 19 4.5 >in 10.6 Composition 47 18 5.2 Impossible to mold - As is apparent from Table 11, when the viscosity ratio η4/η3 was more than 5, it was difficult to mold the composition due to the deterioration of the composition within the molding machine. On the other hand, when the viscosity ratio was nor more than 5, the compositions could be recycled more than ten times for molding. For this reason, the upper limit of the viscosity ratio is 5 from the viewpoint of moldability. When the viscosity ratio was less than 0.3, the composition could be recycled more than 10 times. In this case, however, the mechanical strength of the molded body was about half of that of the molded bodies from the compositions having a viscosity ratio of not less than 0.3, that is, the mechanical strength of the extrudate was lowered. For this reason, the viscosity ratio should not be less than 0.3 from the viewpoint of ensuring the mechanical strength. The same results as obtained in Examples 1, 2 and 3 are obtained also in the cases where PPS, PEN and the like are used as the resin component. Further, the same results can be obtained also in the cases where rare-earth magnet powders obtained in Examples 1 and 3 are used as the magnet powder. Industrial Applicability As described above, the rare-earth bonded magnet composition and the process for producing the same according to the present invention enables rare-earth magnets having high performance and high corrosion resistance to be produced with a high productivity. Further, the rare-earth bonded magnets according to the present invention are suitable for use in automobiles and equipment for OA (office automation).

Claims: A method of preparing a rare-earth bonded magnet, the method comprising the steps of i) preparing a composition comprising a rare-earth magnetic powder and a thermoplastic resin containing one or more additives selected from chelating agents, antioxidants and lubricants said composition having a viscosity η1 as measured at 230°c of 5 kpoise ≤ η1 ≤ 500 kpoise (shear rate 25 sec -1 ) and; ii) extruding the composition to give a viscosity η2 as measured upon delivery from the extruder the viscosity η2 satisfying a requirement represented by the following formula: 0.3 ≤ η2/η1 ≤ 10. A method of preparing a rare-earth bonded magnet the method comprising the steps of i) preparing a composition comprising a rare-earth magnetic powder and a thermoplastic resin containing one or more additives selected from chelating agents, antioxidants and lubricants said composition having a viscosity η3 as measured at 250°c of 1 kpoise ≤ η3 ≤ 100 kpoise (shear rate 1000 sec -1 ) and; ii) injection molding the composition to give a viscosity η4 as measured-upon delivery from the injection molding machine satisfying a requirement represented by the following formula: 0.3 ≤ η4/η3 ≤ 5. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said thermoplastic resin comprises a polyamide resin.

Inventors: AKIOKA KOJI, IKUMA KEN, ISHIBASHI TOSHIYUKI, AKIOKA, KOJI, IKUMA, KEN, ISHIBASHI, TOSHIYUKI, AKIOKA, KOJI SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, IKUMA, KEN SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, ISHIBASHI, TOSHIYUKI SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION
Applicants: SEIKO EPSON CORP, SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION
Application year: 1993
Main classification: H01F1
IPC codes: H01F1, H01F41, B22F1