IMPROVED X-RAY VOLUMETRIC CT SCANNER

Abstract: A slow scanning CT Scanner providing slice data simultaneously for a plurality of slices so as to avoid blurring between adjacent slices due to patient movement.

Description: IMPROVED X-RAY VOLUMETRIC CT SCANNER Field of the Invention This invention pertains to methods and apparatus for obtaining improved CT images employing apparatus and methods which simulate the geometry of an X-ray therapy machine. Cross-Referenced Applications Reference is made to the following copending U.S. Patent Applications, owned by the assignee of this invention, which are incorporated herein by reference. This is a continuation-in-part of the following applications: (1) "Computed Tomography Apparatus using Image Intensifϊer Detector", Serial No. 07/547,450, filed 07-02- 90 (DKT 90-31) (2) "Electronically Enhanced X-ray Detector", Serial No. 07/547,449, filed 07-02-90 (DKT 90-32) (3) "Method for Improving the Dynamic Range of an Imaging System", Serial No. 07/547,451, filed 07-02-90 (DKT 90-33) (4) "Method for Increasing the Accuracy of a Radiation Therapy Apparatus", Serial No. 07/547,799, filed 07-02- 90 (DKT 90-34) (5) "Partial Fan Beam Tomographic Apparatus and Data Reconstruction Method", Serial No. 07/547,596, filed 07- 02-90 (DKT 90-36). Background of the Invention Computed tomography scanners (CT) are now well known for providing cross sectional slice X-ray images of a sample. X-rays are made to transit through the sample from various directions and to impinge on a detector so that the detector is responsive to those X-ray photons which are not absorbed. The geometric relationship between the X-ray source and the detector is fixed so that the paired source and detector can be rotated with the sample or patent near the center of rotation while a new set of data is taken at many angular positions around the sample. The data is processed by a high speed computer using known algorithms to provide a reconstruction of the matrix of the density function of the sample with the ability to display this density function in selective planes or slices across the sample. Diagnosticians study such cross sectional images and can non- invasively evaluate the sample, such as a cancer patient. In early CT apparatus, the images were frequently bluπy, primarily due to the breathing or other movement of the patient during scanning. Several improvements overcome these problems in standard diagnostic CT. Specifically, high power X-ray tubes were developed which made possible higher speed scanning at adequate dose for imaging. This reduced the amount of patient movement between adjacent slices. Additionally, faster and improved algorithms capable of direct fan beam reconstruction without reordering, made real time imaging a meaningful reality. However, these standard diagnostic CT scanners are not optimum for planning radiation therapy for cancer patients. Because high levels of radiation are to be used in treating a cancer patient, it is extremely important that the therapists be able to precisely locate sites of interest for planning and treating. However, the standard diagnostic CT scanner does not configure the patient in exactly the same relationship to the X-ray source as in the radiation therapy machine. Specifically, the position of organs are not the same in the two instruments and this introduces a difficulty in using standard CT Scanners for Radiation Therapy Planning. Because of this problem, another class of X-ray planning device has become known, called a Simulator. As the term implies, the Simulator is a radiographic/fluoroscopic X-ray device which is shaped and outfitted to simulate the geometry of a radiation therapy treatment machine so that the images formed on the simulator can be interpreted more precisely in terms of the therapy machine. These simulator machines have traditionally been less expensive instruments and did not provide CT scanner capability. As described in the patent applications listed above as CROSS REFERENCED APPLICATIONS, a quality CT scanner capability is now available in simulators as well as in diagnostic CT. However, one major distinction between the CT simulator as compared to the standard diagnostic CT scanner is that the simulator was built to mimic the radiation therapy accelerator and like the radiation therapy accelerator is not capable of high speed scanning. For example, a diagnostic CT scanner X-ray source and detector complete a scan of a 360 degree rotation in about 1-2 seconds. In contrast, the Radiation Therapy Simulator takes about 60 seconds to complete one scan. This is close to the treatment exposure time. This is close to the treatment exposure time. However, because the Simulator scan rate is slower, movement of the patient between and during slices can cause significant deterioration of the data. Also, in order to obtain sufficient patient data for analysis it is not unusual to require as many as ten slices. At a minimum due to patient repositioning and scan processing this requires thirty minutes with the patient required to remain in frequently uncomfortable position for the entire time. Summary of the Invention It is an object of this invention to minimize deterioration effects of patient movement on X-ray scanner data in an X-ray Therapy Simulator. It is still a further object to increase the rate of data taking in a Radiation Therapy Simulator to shorten total patient time of discomfort during treatment planning. It is a further object to provide a Radiation Therapy Simulator with improved three dimensional CT having improved point spread correction functions. It is a feature of this invention to provide n simultaneous fan beams and 2n+l simultaneously operating array detectors. It is a still further object to provide this invention as an accessory for use with Radiation Therapy Scanners so that all of the important features and capabilities of those instruments can be retained while relatively inexpensively adding the benefits of volumetric scanning where breathing and other patient motions are correlated across a large number of images. It is a still further object to provide an instrument and method which enables improved calculation and prediction of dose and dose configuration for radiation therapy. Brief Description of the Drawings FIG. 1 is a prospective view of a Radiation Therapy Simulator; FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the inventive system; FIG. 3A is a side view of an embodiment of a multiple fan beam X-ray target anode used in this invention. FIG. 3B is a front view of an embodiment of a multiple fan beam X-ray target anode and pre and post collimators; FIG. 4 is a detail of the front view of the relationship of the X- ray target anode and the pre and post collimator; FIG. 4A is a detail of section AA of FIG. 3; FIG. 4B is a detail of section BB of FIG. 3; FIG. 5 is a drawing of an X-ray tube having multiple filaments. Detailed Description of the Invention With reference to FIG. 1, a portion of a prior art Radiation Therapy Simulator, assigned to the same assignee, is described in the References Applications cited above. The gantry is comprised of a drive unit 10 of welded steel fabrication which is bolted to a base which is cast into the floor. In the drive structure 10 is a mechanism for driving the rotating arm 12 with precision around the isocenter axis 2. On the arm 12 are mounted the carriages 14 and 16 for the X-ray head assembly 18 and image assembly 24 including an image intensifier 20, an imaging extension detector 45 mounted slightly obliquely to the image intensifier, a flip mirror assembly 42 for selectively providing the output from the image intensifier to the photodiode linear array 44 or to the television camera 56. In the X-ray head 18 is a high voltage generator in conjunction with a double focus (0.6 mm and 1mm) X-ray tube containing a lead bladed collimator which can be manually adjusted. Also included in the prior art X-ray head is a motorized cross wire assembly. The treatment couch 26 includes a steel framework supported on a large precision bearing ring mounted into the floor. The frame carries a telescopic ram assembly 28 for the couch 26, and slides 27 for longitudinal movement of the patient as well as a sub chassis for lateral movement. The above prior art Simulator provided a computerized tomography capability and is more fully shown in FIG. 5 of the copending application Serial No.07/547,451 (90-33), referenced above. This prior system, is capable of quality CT scans which are close to the quality of those produced by the very much more expensive and faster diagnostic CT scanners. However, because of the fact that the gantry of the radiation therapy simulator is rotated much more slowly around the patient, i.e., 60 sec vs. 3 seconds, the breathing and/or movement of the patient causes blurring of the images. FIG. 2 illustrates schematically the elements of our inventive simulator improvement to minimize the image blurring due to sample or patient movement. e have provided a modified X-ray source tube, 50 FIG.5, having a rotating anode 61 having and a large number of filaments, to produce simultaneous X-ray source spots, 61-1 through 61-7, FIG. 2, FIG. 3B & FIG. 4. The X-ray source tube has the same number of separate filaments, FIG.5, 100-1 through 100-7, as separate source spots. The required close spacing of the filaments in the tube, i.e., 1.5 cm on center, limits the number of filaments. In this embodiment, seven X-ray fan beams are generated simultaneously, 67- 1 through 67-7. The fan beams are shaped by precollimator 88, FIG. 2, and post collimator 89 which are described more fully subsequently. The plurality of fan beams 67-1 through 67-7 fall on the image intensifier tube (UT) 65 and imaging extension 2-D detector array preferably made from a cadmium tungstate scintillator. In the simulator of copending application S/N 547,450 referenced above, the extension detector was a linear array of 32 discrete detectors of CdW0 4 scintillating crystals mounted atop and optically coupled to a UV enhanced silicon photodiode. Our new array of this invention consists of 7x32 discrete detectors. Our array photodiode has an active area of 6mm 2 and the crystal has an active face of 24mm 2 . The slice thickness is on the order of 1cm. The plural fan beams 67-1 through 67-7 fall on the IIT as explained more fully in the referenced application S/N 547,450. The fan beam in the referenced applications is converted to visible light in the (IIT) and transmitted through lens 68 and right angle mirror 69 to lens 73 and then to a one dimensional photodiode array. In this invention, the photodiode array 44 can be a stack of a plurality of linear arrays 44-1 through 44-7, or it could be a single two dimensional charged coupled detector (CCD). To obtain a spatial resolution of lmm on an object, it is necessary to achieve at least 0.9 line pairs/mm. Commercially available CCD arrays with this resolution, such as Texas Instruments TC 215 (1024 x 1024) or Tektronic (512 X 512), are available. A multichannel scanning charge preamplifier, as described in copending S/N 547,450 is used to introduce data from each of the fan beam from the extension detector 45 and multiplex this data with the ITT data from the 2D detectors 44-1 through 44-7. Preferably, the projection from all the fans are accumulated in computer 80 and simultaneously processed to construct the density function plots for each slice. Algorithms to perform the reconstruction for each fan beam are disclosed in the referenced Parent Application 07/547,596. To produce images within the same general time as in the prior art, since 7 times the amount of data is being taken, simultaneously, computation speed increases on the order of 7 would be needed. The commercially available array processors such as Intel i 860 have speeds of 4 times that of previous chips, on the order of 80 mega floating point operations per second. By combining N such cards it is possible to increase computational speed by a factor of 4N over the single scan system of copending Reference Application S/N 547,595. Alternatively, the data for treatment planning does not necessarily need to be available in real time and the simultaneous collected images can be reconstructed off-line without using the program and the same speed computer as in the system described in Cross Reference Application S N 07/547596, filed 07-02-90 (Dkt. 90-36). To enable the operator to view images in real time, or to retain the alternative of operating the system in the single fan beam mode without changing the X-ray tube, a power supply 83, FIG. 2, is provided with the capability to switch off the excitation of the X-ray tube filaments except for the single central filament, 61-4. To retain the same number of pins in the base of the modified X-ray tube, as in a normal two filament X-ray tube, all the filaments of our X-ray Tube are in series and the central filament is tapped on both sides so that it can be excited exclusively. Since the scanning rate for the Simulator is slower than a standard diagnostic X-ray tube, it is only necessary to provide 15ma current for each filament at 125KV to obtain the required X-ray dosage. Current X-ray tubes can provide this power level. With reference to FIG. 3A, the X-ray tube motor 101 rotates the tungsten target 61 at high speed, i.e., near 10,000 RPM and the X- ray fan 102 is shown in relation to the isocenter 2 and the normal position for scanning a patient's head 103. FIG. 3B discloses the relationship of the spots 61-1 through 61-7 on the rotating anode target bevel as seen from the front. The lead collimator 88, shown more fully in FIGS. 4 and 4A, is seen to define the width of each of the fans 67-1 through 67-7 which impinge on the patent. The collimator 89 defines the width of the fan beams as they leave the post collimator 89 and enter the detector. FIG. 4, 4A and 4B define the details of the geometry of the relationship between the X-ray target 61 and the collimators 88 and 89. In particular, the central spot 61-4, is 100.0 cm from the isocenter and 55.0 cm from collimator 88. The collimator gaps are on 1.50cm centers, and each gap is 7mm. The collimator 89 is also on 1.50 cm centers where the collimator wall portion is 0.2cm wide. The post collimator 89 gaps and dimensions and the precollimator 88 gaps and dimensions need to be configurated so that no source spot on the rotating anode has a direct line of sight to any portion of the detector except the portion of the detector which lies on the ray containing the source spot, the center of the corresponding pre collimator gap and the center of the corresponding post collimator gap. Between the collimator 89 and the IIT 65 is an antiscatter focus grid 38 which further rejects X-rays other than line-of-sight X-rays including X-ray scatter from the patient. Further with respect to FIG. 4, below the collimator 89 is schematically illustrated a series of detector arrays 44' and 45'. As described earlier, the number of detector arrays 44 equaled the number of fan beams. In FIG. 4, we disclose the alternative of employing twice the number of detectors plus 1 times the number of fan beams. In the copending referenced parent application, S/N 547,799, we describe a crosstalk error as a two dimensional point spread function. This error is seen to arise when a portion of the amplitude received at a detector did not follow the pencil beam path from the source to the detector. This comes from short range scatter and long range scatter (or crosstalk) from X-rays that are along other paths. Although in our earlier patent we provided a correction for the spread function, it was based on theoretical assumption of the model which are not always highly accurate. In this invention, by providing 2N+1 detectors and placing the detectors such that alternative detectors are shielded from the direct X-ray beam by the post collimators 89 we can improve the point spread function correction. Thus, the amplitude received by detectors in the valleys located between the high photon intensity directly receiving detectors corresponds to the crosstalk only. Accordingly, this crosstalk data can be smoothed, interpolated, averaged involving appropriate numerical manipulations to provide a correction for the detector readings from the ridges by subtracting out a position interpolated reading based on the nearby valley position detectors. This provides a much improved point spread correction since it is based on nearby measurement under identical conditions at identical times. This invention is not intended to be restricted to the particulars of the embodiment disclosed, and it is understood that it can be accomplished by alternate equivalent means. The scope of the invention should be construed by the following claims.

Claims: What is claimed is: 1. In a Radiation Therapy Simulator X-ray CT apparatus including radiation therapy simulator gantry means for supporting a X- ray source and a detector and for maintaining said source and detector in a fan beam fixed relationship while said gantry is rotating about an axis in space; means to position a sample to be examined by X-rays, said position being between said X-ray source and said detector; computer means coupled to said detector for receiving signals proportional to the transmitted X-ray photon intensity of said fan beams of X-rays after said X-rays have traversed through a sample at a plurality of gantry positions about said axis including means to correlate each signal for each fan to each said gantry position including means to reconstruct X-ray density cross sectional images of shces of an examined sample by performing fan beam reconstruction computations on said signals, THE IMPROVEMENT COMPRISING: said X-ray source including means for simultaneously directing a plurality of parallel fan beams toward said detector; said detector includes means for simultaneously receiving said plurality of parallel fan beams; and said computer means includes means to compute said X-ray cross sectional density distributions for each of said fan beams. 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said means for simultaneously directing a plurality of N parallel fan beams includes an X-ray tube having a rotatable X-ray target anode and n electron guns, said n electron guns for simultaneously launching beams of high energy electrons towards said target anode so that the sources of the X-rays which are emitted from said target anode are spots spatially separated so that each fan beam emitted from said target anode is equally spaced from its next adjacent fan beam. 3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the width of each said X-ray fan beam is equal and is defined by a first pre sample collimator and a second post sample collimator. 4. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the said detector includes a two dimensional array of visible light detectors. 5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said two dimensional array comprises a plurality of linear arrays stacked together. 6. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said detector includes a two-dimensional visible light array detector, an image intensifier tube (UT) for converting X-ray photons to visible light, an optical lens means for focusing the visible image of said UT upon said two- dimensional visible light array detector. 7. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the number of detector linear arrays equals 2N+1, and where alternate detector arrays are exposed to fan beam X-rays and intermediate detector arrays are shielded from said fan beam X-rays by said postcollimators. 8. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein said first presample collimator and said second presample collimator are configured to preclude direct line of sight between any source spot and any portion of said detector other than the portion of said detector which is aligned to a ray from said spot and which passes through the center point of the gaps in both said precollimator and send post collimator. 9. An X-ray CT apparatus comprising: a gantry having an axis; an X-ray source and an X-ray detector means, said gantry means for supporting said X-ray source and said X-ray detector in a fan beam relationship and while said gantry is rotating about said axis; means to position a sample to be examined by X-rays from said source, said position being between said X-ray source and said X-ray detector means; said X-ray detector means for providing signals, in operation, which are proportional to the transmitted X-ray photon intensity of said beam of X-rays after said X-rays have traversed through a sample at a plurality of gantry positions about said gantry axis; computer means coupled to said X-ray detector means to correlate each signal for each fan to each said gantry position including means to reconstruct X-ray density cross sectional images of shces of an examined sample by performing fan beam reconstruction computations on said signals; said X-ray source including means for simultaneously directing a plurality of parallel fan beams toward said X-ray detector means; said X-ray detector means including means for simultaneously receiving said plurality of parallel fan beams and for providing an output signal indicative of the intensity of said transmitted X-ray photons; said computer means includes means to compute said X-ray cross sectional density distributions for each of said fan beams. 10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein said means for simultaneously directing a plurality of N parallel fan beams includes an X-ray tube having a rotatable X-ray target anode and n electron guns, said n electron guns for simultaneously launching beams of high energy electrons towards said target anode so that the sources of the X-rays which are emitted from said target anode are spots spatially separated so that each fan beam emitted from said target anode is equally spaced from its next adjacent fan beam. 11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the width of each said plurality of said X-ray fan beams is equal and is defined by a first pre sample collimator and a second post sample collimator. 12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the said X-ray detector means includes a 2N+ 1 plurality of detector linear arrays, and where alternate detector arrays are exposed to fan beam X-rays and intermediate detector arrays are shielded from said fan beam X-rays by said postcollimators. 13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein both said alternative detector arrays and said intermediate detector arrays provide output signals, and wherein said alternative detector arrays provide output signals which are a measure of crosstalk, said alternative detector output signals and said intermediate crosstalk signalsbeing coupled to said computer; and means in said computer to use said crosstalk output signals to generate a correction known as point spread correction to correct said output signals provided by said intermediate detector arrays. 14. A method for providing an improved correction for point spread in an X-ray CT apparatus comprising: shielding alternate detectors from receiving direct line of sight X-ray beams; simultaneously collecting signals from said alternate detectors representative of crosstalk and from detectors intermediate said alternate detectors; analyzing said collected signals in a computer and providing a correction value of crosstalk for the position of each intermediate detector; and correcting said intermediate detector signals by subtracting said correction value corresponding to the position of said intermediate detector. 15. The method of claim 14 wherein said step of providing said corrected value includes smoothing said alternate detector data and interpolating said data to find the value of said crosstalk which corresponds to said position of said intermediate detectors.

Inventors: PAVKOVICH JOHN M, SEPPI EDWARD J, SHAPIRO EDWARD G, PAVKOVICH, JOHN, M., SEPPI, EDWARD, J., SHAPIRO, EDWARD, G.
Applicants: VARIAN ASSOCIATES, VARIAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Application year: 1993
Main classification: A61B6
IPC codes: A61B6, A61N5