TRANSGENIC POMACEOUS FRUIT WITH FIRE BLIGHT RESISTANCE

Abstract: The present invention relates to a method of conferring resistance against fire blight to pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars by transforming such cultivars with a gene which encodes for lytic proteins. Such transformation can be effected by bacterial infection or propulsion of particles into cell interiors. Once transformation has taken place, the cultivar is regenerated to a transgenic pomaceous fruit tree. This technique is particularly useful in treating apple and pear cultivars.

Description: TRANSGENIC POMACEOUS FRUIT WITH FIRE BLIGHT RESISTANCE This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 07/954,347, filed September 30, 1992 FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to conferring resistance against fire blight to pomaceous fruit scion and rootstock cultivars. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In North America, trees for pomaceous fruits, such as apples, pears, quince, and other members of the Rosaceae family, are widely afflicted with the disease known as fire blight. Although indigenous to North America, this disease has more recently gained a foothold in Europe and now is of considerable concern on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Fire blight is a bacterial disease caused by the infection of pomaceous fruit trees with the bacterium Erwinia amylovora. This bacterium can be disseminated from one tree to another by rain, wind, insects, birds, and man. Generally, infection occurs through natural openings in the tree, particularly blossoms. This causes blossoms first to appear water soaked, then to wilt and shrivel, and finally to turn black or brown. The disease then spreads to other parts of the tree, including branches, the trunk, and roots. This disease is manifested in tree limbs, trunks, and roots as cankers from which liquid oozes to spread the disease. Fire blight on twigs and suckers of fruit trees causes shoots, bark, and leaves to turn dark brown or black. This gives them a scorched appearance, hence the name fire blight. Fire blight not only destroys the current year's crops but can also have a long-term impact. Blossom infection will reduce the current season's crop by killing fruit. In addition, twig blight destroys wood that could bear fruit spurs the following season. In pears and quinces, as well as many apple cultivars and rootstocks, blight can destroy large limbs or even an entire tree. In view of fire blight's potentially devastating effect on pomaceous fruit crops, the need exists to combat that disease. It has been found that pear cultivars and many apple cultivars are particularly susceptible to fire blight. Nevertheless, both types of cultivars have some forms which are more resistant to fire blight. Not only do the fruiting scions have varying susceptibility, but so do the rootstocks for apple and pear trees. As a result, one approach to combating fire blight is to breed cultivars and rootstocks for pomaceous fruit trees which are resistant to fire blight. Such programs, however, require trial and error and long periods of time to yield trees with fire blight resistance. In addition, a very limited number of apple and pear cultivars are responsible for a large portion of annual production. These cultivars are prized by consumers, supermarkets, and growers for their appearance, quality, flavor, storability, and production characteristics. To retain varietal characteristics and to introduce disease resistant genes by sexual breeding is virtually impossible, because the long generation time and self-incompatibility of apples and pears make backcross programs astronomically longterm and expensive. Another approach to combating fire blight is by following horticultural practices which minimize the disease's outbreak. It has been found that reducing soil moisture and maintaining a balance of fertilizer nutrients can control fire blight infection and propagation. Although such approaches can be helpful, they are not capable of eliminating outbreak of the disease. It is also possible to treat fire blight by removing cankers and blighted branches from infected trees, preferably during the winter when the disease is dormant. Equipment for carrying out such procedures must, however, be carefully sterilized to prevent the disease from being spread. Moreover, this approach cannot completely eradicate the disease, because areas with small cankers or internal infection may escape detection. Trees infected with fire blight can also be periodically sprayed with copper compounds or antibiotics to control fire blight. The application of copper compounds has not achieved wide acceptance, however, because it is often ineffective and causes fruit russeting. The use of κ antibiotics, particularly streptomycin, is more effective and less injurious to fruit than copper compounds. However, Erwinia amylovora has developed resistance to streptomycin in many states where it has been used, including California, Oregon, Washington, Missouri, and Michigan. Further, an antibiotic program is expensive and many countries in Europe prohibit its use. Biological control of fire blight has also been attempted. Such efforts have been particularly directed to developing organisms antagonistic to Erwinia amylovora. Biological control studies indicate that such techniques have potential usefulness in controlling fire blight, but none of the tested procedures are sufficiently effective or developed to replace chemical treatments. In view of the deficiencies of present techniques of combating fire blight in pomaceous fruit, the need remains for an effective treatment procedure. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method of conferring resistance against fire blight to pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars. In accordance with the invention, pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars are transformed with a gene which encodes for a lytic protein. Such transformation can be carried out by contacting tissue of the cultivar with an inoculum of bacterium of the genus Agrobacterium which is transformed with a vector comprising the gene encoding for a lytic protein. Alternatively, transformation of the cultivar can be carried out by propelling inert or biologically active particles at cultivar tissue. This causes the vector comprising a gene encoding for a lytic protein, which is either associated with the particles or around cells of the tissue, to be introduced into the interior of the cells. Once transformed, the cultivars are regenerated to form a transgenic pomaceous fruit tree. It is particularly desirable to utilize the present invention in conjunction with apple and pear trees. A wide variety of rootstock and scion cultivars for each can be utilized. Also encompassed by the present invention is a transgenic pomaceous fruit, particularly apple or pear, scion or rootstock cultivar transformed with a gene which encodes for a lytic protein. In addition, a transgenic pomaceous fruit tree transformed with that gene is also disclosed. Incorporation of that gene imparts fire blight resistance. Fire blight resistant transgenic variants of the current commercial fruiting cultivars (scions) and rootstocks of apples and pears allows for more complete control of fire blight while retaining the varietal characteristics of specific cultivars. Such fire blight control is possible without environmental and food contamination, resulting from use of chemicals and antibiotics. The interests of the public health, the environment, and the economics of fruit growing are all benefited by the present invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 shows the nucleotide (SEQ. ID. No. 3) and the amino acid (SEQ. ID. No. 4) for chicken (egg white) lysozyme and a restriction map of that insert in plasmid vector plysl023. Figure 2 is a map of the transfer DNA ("T-DNA") of plasmid vector pBI121. Figure 3 is a map of plasmid vector pMON530. Figure 4 is a map of plasmid vector pLDB2. Figure 5 is a map of plasmid vector pLDB3. Figure 6 is a map of plasmid vector pLDB8. Figure 7 is a map of plasmid vector pLDB9. Figure 8 is a map of T-DNA of plasmid vector pLDBll. Figure 9 is a map of T-DNA of plasmid vector pLDB12. Figure 10 is a schematic drawing showing the steps of forming plasmid vector pLDB7. Figure 11 is a schematic drawing showing the steps of forming plasmid vector pLDBlO. Figure 12 is a schematic drawing showing the steps of forming plasmid vector pLDB14. Figure 13 shows the nucleotide (SEQ ID No. 9) and amino acid (SEQ ID No. 10) sequences of the cDNA sequence for mature Attacin E (564 base pairs) together with a 3' non-coding region (159 base pairs) and a restriction map of the insert in the attacin clone pCP521. Figure 14 is a schematic drawing showing the steps of forming plasmid vector pLDB202. Figure 15 is a schematic drawing showing the steps of forming plasmid vector pLDB15. Figures 16A, 16B, and 16C show the Southern Analysis for the transgenic apple (Tl) of the present invention hybridized with an attacin gene probe, a β-glucuronidase ("GUS") probe, and a neomycin phosphotransferase gene ("nptll") probe, respectively. In each, lambda is in lane 1, pBI121 is in lane 2, pLDB15 is in lane 3, M.26 genomic DNA is in lane 4, and Tl genomic DNA is in lane 5. The DNA in all five lanes was digested with Hindlll. Tl is an Attacin E lytic protein transgenic derived from M.26. pLDB15 contains a ca. 2400 bp Hindlll fragment containing the Attacin E protein gene inserted into the Hindlll site of the binary vector pBI121. The numbers at the left side of these figures indicate the size in kb of the lambda size markers. The approximate locations of the lambda size markers are drawn into lane 1 of 16B and 16C. Figure 17 shows the ID50 fire blight resistance rating for the transgenic apple cultivar (Tl) , the M.26 parent cultivar, and the Liberty cultivar. Figure 18 shows the progress of the fire blight disease over time for the transgenic apple cultivar (Tl) and the M.26 parent cultivar. Figure 19 shows a Northern Analysis of Expression of the Attacin E gene in Tl. Figure 20 are maps of T-DNA of plasmid vectors pBPRSl, pBPRB37, pBCCS, and pBCCB37. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION AND DRAWINGS The present invention relates to a method of conferring resistance against fire blight to pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars and to pomaceous fruit scion and rootstock cultivars per se having such resistance. The process of conferring fire blight resistance includes transforming pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars with a gene which encodes a lytic protein. Once transformation has occurred, the cultivar is regenerated to form a transgenic pomaceous fruit tree. Plant tissues suitable for transformation include leaf tissue, root tissue, meristems, and protoplasts. It is particularly preferred to utilize leaf tissue. One technique of transforming pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars with a gene which encodes for a lytic protein is by contacting the tissue of such a cultivar with an inoculum of a bacteria transformed with a vector comprising a gene that encodes for a lytic protein. Generally, this procedure involves inoculating the apple or pear tissue with a suspension of bacteria and incubating the tissue for 48 to 72 hours on regeneration medium without antibiotics at 25-28°C. Bacteria from the genus Agrobacterium can be utilized to transform plant cells. Suitable species of such bacterium include Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Agrobacterium tumefaciens (e.g., strains LBA4404 or EHA105) is particularly useful due to its well-known ability to transform plants. In inoculating the tissue of pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars with Agrobacterium, the bacteria must be transformed with a vector which includes a gene encoding for a lytic protein. Suitable proteins include lysozyme, attacins, cecropins, and homologs thereof. It is known that various pupae of silk moths can be immunized with non-pathogenic bacteria or heat-killed pathogens to produce a set of such proteins which are not normally present in the hemolymph of these animals. Although the injection of such bacteria or pathogens has been carried out with a number of different insects, diapausing pupae of the giant silk moth Hvalophora cecropia have proven particularly effective. Several of the proteins produced by such immunized moths have been found to have lytic activity (i.e. causing cells to lyse) against a broad range of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Lysozyme is one suitable lytic peptide. It limits the growth of a broad spectrum of bacteria. As set forth in J.M. Jaynes, et al., "Increasing Bacterial Resistance in Plants Utilizing Antibacterial Genes from Insects," BioEssays 6:263-270 (1987), which is hereby incorporated by reference, the nucleotide (SEQ. ID. No. 1) and amino acid (SEQ. ID. No. 2) sequences of lysozyme from Hvalophora cecropia, are as follows: TGC CGT TCG CAG TTC GCT TTG CAT TGC GAT GCG AAA CGT TTC ACG AGA TGC GGG Cys Arg Ser Gin Phe Ala Leu His Cys Asp Ala Lys Arg Phe Thr Arg Cys Gly TTA GTG CAG GAG CTT AGG AGA CGA GGC TTC GAT GAA ACT TTG ATG AGT AAC TGG Leu Val Gin Glu Leu Arg Arg Arg Gly Phe Asp Glu Thr Leu Met Ser Asn Trp GTC TGC CTT GTC GAG AAC GAA AGC GGA CGG TTT ACC GAT AAA ATC GGT AAA GTT Val Cys Leu Val Glu Asn Glu Ser Gly Arg Phe Thr Asp Lys He Gly Lys Val AAC AAG AAC GGA TCT CGA GAC TAC GGC CTC TTC CAG ATC AAT GAC AAA TAC TGG Asn Lys Asn Gly Ser Arg Asp Tyr Gly Leu Phe Gin He Asn Asp Lys Tyr Trp TGC AGT AAG GGA TCC ACT CCT GGA AAG GAT TGC AAC GTG ACT TGT AAT CAG CTA Cys Ser Lys Gly Ser Thr Pro Gly Lys Asp Cys Asn Val Thr Cys Asn Gin Leu k CTG ACT GAC GAC ATT AGC GTG GCA GCT ACG TGC GCG AAG AAG ATT TAC AAA CGC Leu Thr Asp Asp He Ser Val Ala Ala Thr Cys Ala Lys Lys He Tyr Lys Arg CAC AAG TTT GAC GCT TGG TAC GGA TGG AAA AAT CAC TGT CAA CAT GGA CTG CCA His Lys Phe Asp Ala Trp Tyr Gly Trp Lys Asn His Cys Gin His Gly Leu Pro GAT ATT AGC GAC TGT TAG Asp He Ser Asp Cys Stop The nucleotides and amino acid sequences in bold face, respectively, encode for or constitute a partial leader peptide. The nucleotide (SEQ. ID. No. 3) and amino acid (SEQ. ID. No. 4) for chicken (egg white) lysozyme and a restriction map of that insert in the plasmid vector plysl023 is shown in Figure 1. The cloning of these sequences into plasmid vectors is set forth in L. Destefano Beltran, "The Introduction into Tobacco Plants of Genes which Encode Some of the Natural Components of the Humoral Immune Response of Hyalaphora cecropia, A. Dissertation Submitted to Louisiana State University" (1991) ("Destafano Beltran Thesis"), which is hereby incorporated by reference. Variations of these nucleotide/ amino acid sequences are also known. Another group of lytic proteins which has been found to have an antibacterial activity in immunized Hvalophora cecropia are attacins. Attacins are the largest lytic proteins from this source with a molecular weight of about 20,000 daltons. There are six slightly different forms of attacins — i.e. Attacins A through F. Two genes are responsible for producing the attacins with the 6 specific attacins resulting from post- translational modification. Attacin E is a neutral-acidic form of attacin that results from the non-modified translation of one of the two attacin genes. Tests using the amino acid sequence of the N-terminus of five of the attacins indicate the presence of 3 basic and 2 acidic forms which differ slightly from each other. The deduced nucleotide (SEQ. ID. No. 5)and amino acid (SEQ. ID. No. 6) sequences for Attacin E are disclosed in J.M. Jaynes, et al., "Increasing Bacterial Resistance in Plants Utilizing Antibacterial Genes from Insects," BioEssavs 6:263-270 (1987), which is hereby incorporated by reference, as follows: GAC GCG CAC GGA GCC CTT ACG CTC AAC TCC GAT GGT ACC TCT GGT GCT GTG GTT Asp Ala His Gly Ala Leu Thr Leu Asn Ser Asp Gly Thr Ser Gly Ala Val Val AAA GTA CCC TTT GCT GGT AAC GAC AAG AAT ATA GTA AGC GCT ATC GGT TCC GTA Lys Val Pro Phe Ala Gly Asn Asp Lys Asn He Val Ser Ala He Gly Ser Val GAC TTA ACT GAT AGG CAG AAA CTA GGC GCT GCA ACC GCT GGA GTG GCA CTG GAT Asp Leu Thr Asp Arg Gin Lys Leu Gly Ala Ala Thr Ala Gly Val Ala Leu Asp AAT ATA AAC GGT CAC GGA CTA AGT CTC ACG GAT ACA CAC ATC CCC GGG TTC GGA Asn He Asn Gly His Gly Leu Ser Leu Thr Asp Thr His He Pro Gly Phe Gly GAC AAG ATG ACA GCA GCC GGC AAA GTG AAT GTC TTC CAC AAT GAT AAC CAC GAC Asp Lys Met Thr Ala Ala Gly Lys Val Asn Val Phe His Asn Asp Asn His Asp ATC ACA GCG AAG GCT TTC GCC ACC AGA AAC ATG CCG GAT ATT GCT AAT GTA CCT He Thr Ala Lys Ala Phe Ala Thr Arg Asn Met Pro Asp He Ala Asn Val Pro AAT TTC AAC ACT GTC GGT GGC GGA ATA GAC TAT ATG TTC AAA GAT AAG ATT GGT Asn Phe Asn Thr Val Gly Gly Gly He Asp Tyr Met Phe Lys Asp Lys He Gly GCA TCT GCG AGC GCC GCT CAC ACG GAC TTT ATC AAT CGC AAC GAC TAC TCT CTT Ala Ser Ala Ser Ala Ala His Thr Asp Phe He Asn Arg Asn Asp Tyr Ser Leu GAC GGG AAA CTG AAC CTC TTC AAG ACT CCT GAT ACC TCG ATT GAT TTC AAC GCC Asp Gly Lys Leu Asn Leu Phe Lys Thr Pro Asp Thr Ser He Asp Phe Asn Ala GGT TTC AAG AAG TTC GAT ACA CCT TTC ATG AAG TCC TCT TGG GAG CCT AAC TTC Gly Phe Lys Lys Phe Asp Thr Pro Phe Met Lys Ser Ser Trp Glu Pro Asn Phe GGA TTC TCA CTT TCT AAA TAT TTC TGA TTA Gly Phe Ser Leu Ser Lys Tyr Phe Stop Stop The cDNA nucleotide and amino acid sequences for the other attacins are disclosed in A. Engstrom et.al., "Insect Immunity. The Primary Structure of the Antibacterial Protein Attacin F ' and its Relation to the Two Native Attacins from Hyalophora cecropin" , EMBO J. , vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 2065-70 (1984) and K. Kockum, et. al., "Insect Immunity. Isolation and Sequence of two cDNA Clones Corresponding to Acidic and Basic Attacins from Hyalophora cecropra n , EMBO J., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 2071-75 (1984), which are hereby incorporated by reference. Cecropins are the most potent antibacterial peptide with a broad spectrum of activity against both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. They are small and found in three major forms — i.e. Cecropin A, Cecropin B, and Cecropin D. They all have a high degree of homology with a basic N-terminal region and a hydrophobic stretch in the C-terminal part of the molecule. The amino acid (SEQ. ID. No. 7) sequence for Cecropin A is disclosed in WO 89/04371, which is hereby incorporated by reference, as follows: Lys Trp Lys Leu Phe Lys Lys He Glu Lys Val Gly Gin Asn He Arg Asp Gly He He Lys Ala Gly Pro Ala Val Ala Val Val Gly Gin Ala Thr Gin He Ala Lys From this amino acid sequence, suitable nucleotide sequences can be derived by those skilled in the art. The nucleotide (SEQ. ID. No. 8) and amino acid (SEQ. ID. No. 9) sequences of the clone encoding for the precursor of Cecropin B is disclosed in J.M. Jaynes, et al., "Increasing Bacterial Resistance in Plants Utilizing Antibacterial Genes from Insects," BioEssavs 6:263-270 (1987), which is incorporated by reference, as follows: ATG AAT TTC TCA AGG ATA TTT TTC TTC GTG TTC GCT TTG GTT CTG GCT Met Asn Phe Ser Arg lie Phe Phe Phe Val Phe Ala Leu Val Leu Ala TCA ACA GTT TCG GCT GCA CCG GAG CCG AAA TGG AAA GTC TTC AAG AAA Ser Thr Val Ser Ala Ala Pro Glu Pro Lys Trp Lys Val Phe Lys Lys ■ 'ATT GAA AAA ATG GGT CGC AAC ATT CGA AAC CGT ATT GTC AAG GCT GGA He Glu Lys Met Gly Arg Asn He Arg Asn Gly He Val Lys Ala Gly CCA GCG ATC GCG GTT TTA GGC GAA GCC AAA GCG CTA GGA TAA Pro Ala He Ala Val Leu Gly Glu Ala Lys Ala Leu Gly Stop The nucleotide and amino acid sequences in bold face, respectively, encode for or constitute a leader peptide. The amino acid sequence (SEQ. ID. No. 10) for Cecropin D is disclosed in WO 89/04371, which is hereby incorporated by reference, as follows: Trp Asn Pro Phe Lys Glu Leu Glu Lys Val Gly Gin Arg Val Arg Asp Ala Val He Ser Ala Gly Pro Ala Val Ala Thr Val Ala Asn Ala Thr Ala Leu Ala Lys From this amino acid sequence, suitable nucleotide sequences can be derived by those skilled in the art. Synthetic homologs of lysozyme, attacins, and cecropins have also been developed. One example of such a synthetic peptide is Shiva I which was designed with highly significant differences in sequence homology while maintaining charge distribution, amphipathy, and hydrophobic properties of natural cecropin B. Its amino acid sequence (SEQ. ID. No. 11) is described in L. Destefano-Beltran, et al., "Enhancing Bacterial and Fungal Disease Resistance in Plants: Application to Potato, " The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Potato, Vayda M.E. and Park W.D. (eds), CAB International Wallingford, UK pp. 205-221 (1990), which is hereby incorporated by reference, as follows: Met Pro Arg Trp Arg Leu Phe Arg Arg He Asp Arg Val Gly Lys Gin He Lys Gin He Leu Arg Ala Gly Pro Ala He Ala Leu Val Gly Asp Ala Arg Ala Val Gly From this amino acid sequence, suitable nucleotide sequences can be derived by those skilled in the art. Another known homolog is the synthetic peptide SB-37 which has minor changes from the parent cecropin B molecule due to substitution of methionine 11 with valine and addition of an NH 2 -terminal methionine, proline. The amino acid sequence (SEQ. ID. No. 12) for this peptide is disclosed in L. Destefano-Beltran, et al., "Enhancing Bacterial and Fungal Disease Resistance in Plants: Application to Potato," Vayda ME and Park WD (eds), CAB International Walling Ford, UK pp. 203-221 (1990) , which is hereby incorporated by reference, as follows: Met Pro Lys Trp Lys Val Phe Lys Lys He Glu Lys Val Gly Arg Asn He Arg Asn Gly He Val Lys Ala Gly Pro Ala He Ala Val Leu Gly Glu Ala Lys Ala Leu Gly From this amino acid sequence, suitable nucleotide sequences can be derived by those skilled in the art. To permit export of lytic proteins from plant cells, the gene coding for that protein is fused to a gene coding for a signal peptide. As a result, a fusion protein containing the signal peptide joined to the lytic protein is formed. The presence of the signal peptide directs the fusion protein to the cell's endoplasmic reticulum where the signal sequence is cleaved. The lytic protein is then modified in the endoplasmic reticulum lumen or in the Golgi complex and secreted outside the cell. It is possible to utilize this concept in conjunction with any of the lytic proteins identified above. Particularly useful fusion proteins are sPRl or sCEC signal peptides fused to Shiva I or SB-37 (i.e. sPRl-Shiva I, SPR1-SB37, sCEC-Shiva I, and SCEC-CSB37) . See J. Denecke, "Protein Secretion in Plant Cells Can Occur via a Default Pathway," The Plant Cell, vol. 2, pp. 51-59 (1990), which is hereby incorporated by reference. The nucleotide (SEQ. ID. No. 13) and amino acid (SEQ. ID. No. 14) sequences for sCEC-Shiva I are as follows: ATG AAC TTT TCT AGG ATC TTC TTT TTC GTG TTC GCT CTT GTT CTC GCC Met Asn Phe Ser Arg He Phe Phe Phe Val Phe Ala Leu Val Leu Ala TTG TCC ACT GTG TCT GCC GCT CCT GAC ATG CCG CGC TGG CGT CTG TTC Leu Ser Thr Val Ser Ala Ala Pro Asp Met Pro Arg Trp Arg Leu Phe CGC CGT ATC GAC CGT GTT GGC AAA CAG ATC AAA CAG GGT ATC CTG CGT Arg Arg He Asp Arg Val Gly Lys Gin He Lys Gin Gly He Leu Arg GCT GGC CCG GCT ATC GCT CTG GTT GGC GAC GCC CGC GCA GTT GGT Ala Gly Pro Ala He Ala Leu Val Gly Asp Ala Arg Ala Val Gly TGA GAA TTC GCT AGC AAG CTT STOP The nucleotide and amino acid sequences in bold face respectively, encode for or constitute the signal peptide. The nucleotide (SEQ. ID. No. 15) and amino acid (SEQ. ID. No. 16) sequences for SCEC-SB37 are as follows: ATG AAC TTT TCT AGG ATC TTC TTT TTC GTG TTC GCT CTT GTT CTC GCC Met Asn Phe Ser Arg He Phe Phe Phe Val Phe Ala Leu Val Leu Ala TTG TCC ACT GTG TCT GCC GCT CCT GAG CCG AAA TGG AAA GTC TTC AAG Leu Ser Thr Val Ser Ala Ala Pro Glu Pro Lys Trp Lys Val Phe Lys AAA ATT GAA AAA GTC GGT CGC AAC ATT CGA AAC GGT ATT GTC AAG GCT Lys He Glu Lys Val Gly Arg Asn He Arg Asn Gly He Val Lys Ala GGA CCA GCG ATC GCG GTT TTA GGC GAA GCC AAA GCG CTA GGA TAA GAA Gly Pro Ala He Ala Val Leu Gly Glu Ala Lys Ala Leu Gly STOP TTC GCT AGC AAG CTT Again, the nucleotide and amino acid sequences in bold face respectively, encode for or constitute the signal peptide. The nucleotide (SEQ. ID. No. 17) and amino acid (SEQ. ID. No. 18) sequences for sPRl-Shiva I are as follows: ATG GGA TTT TTC CTT TTT TCT CAA ATG CCA TCC TTC TTT CTC GTG TCC Met Gly Phe Phe Leu Phe Ser Glu Met Pro Ser Phe Phe Leu Val Ser ACT CTT CTC CTT TTC CTC ATT ATC TCT CAC TCC TCT CAT GCT ACC ATG Thr Leu Leu Leu Phe Leu He He Ser His Ser Ser Ala Ala Thr Met CCG CGC TGG CGT CTG TTC CGC CGT ATC GAC CGT GTT GGC AAA Pro Arg Trp Arg Leu Phe Arg Arg He Asp Arg Val Gly Lys CAG ATC AAA CAG GGT ATC CTG CGT GCT AGC CCG GCT ATC GCT CGT GTT Gin He Lys Gin Gly He Leu Arg Ala Gly Pro Ala He Ala Leu Val GGC GAC GCC CGC GCA GTT GGT TGA GAA TTC Gly Asp Ala Arg Ala Val Gly STOP The nucleotide and amino acid sequences in bold face respectively encode for or constitute the signal peptide. The nucleotide (SEQ. ID. No. 19) and amino acid (SEQ. ID. No. 20) for SPR1-SB37 are as follows: ATG GGA TTT TTC CTT TTT TCT CAA ATG CCA TCC TTC TTT CTC GTG TCC Met Gly Phe Phe Leu Phe Ser Glu Met Pro Ser Phe Phe Leu Val Ser ACT CTT CTC CTT TTC CTC ATT ATC TCT CAC TCC TCT CAT GCT ATG CCG Thr Leu Leu Leu Phe Leu He He Ser Hie Ser Ser Ala Ala Met Pro AAA TGG AAA GTC TTC AAG AAA ATT GAA AAA GTC GGT CGC AAC ATT CGA Lys Try Lys Val Phe Lys Lys He Glu Lys Val Gly Arg Asn He Arg AAC GGT ATT GTC AAG GCT GGA CCA GCG ATC GCG GTT TTA GGC GAA GCC Asn Gly He Val Lys Ala Gly Pro Ala He Ala Val Leu Gly Glu Ala AAA GCG CTA GGA TAA GAA TTC Lys Ala Leu Gly STOP The nucleotide and amino acid sequences in bold face, respectively encode for or constitute the signal peptide. Other lytic proteins which may be suitable include metittins, magainins, bombinins, xenopsins, caeruleins, and sarcotoxins. The amino acid sequences for these and other useful lytic proteins are disclosed in WO 89/04371, which is hereby incorporated by reference, particularly Table I therein. Vectors, suitable for incorporation in Agrobacterium, which include a gene encoding for a lytic protein, can be in the form of plasmids. Such plasmids contain an origin of , replication for replication in the bacterium Escherichia coli, an origin of replication for replication in the bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens, T-DNA right border sequences for transfer of genes to plants, and marker genes for selection of transformed plant cells. Particularly preferred is the vector pBI121 which contains a low-copy RK2 origin of replication, the neomycin phosphotransferase (nptll) marker gene with a nopaline synthase (NOS) promoter and a NOS 3' polyadenylation signal, and the β-glucuronidase (GUS) marker gene with a CaMV 35S promoter and a NOS 3' polyadenylation signal. Figure 2 is a map of T-DNA plasmid vector pBH21, which is available from Clonetech Laboratories, Inc., 4030 Fabian Way, Palo Alto, California 94303. Other suitable vectors include pMON530 (Figure 3) and pMON200 (see Figure 10) . A gene encoding for a lytic protein is inserted into the vector. For lytic protein production, the following plasmids are useful: pLDB15 (see Figure 15) which encodes Attacin E protein; pLDBl (see Figure 10) which encodes for SB-37 lytic peptide; pLDB2 (see Figure 4) which encodes Attacin E protein, pLDB3 (see Figure 5) which encodes chicken lysozyme; pLDB4 which encodes T4 phage lysozyme; pLDB5 which encodes P22 protein gene 13; pLDB6 which encodes P22 lysozyme gene 19; pLDB7 (see Figure 10) which encodes SB-37 lytic protein; pLDBδ (see Figure 6) which encodes Attacin E protein; pLDB9 (see Figure 7) which encodes chicken lysozyme; pLDBlO (see Figure 11) which encodes SB-37 lytic peptide; pLDBll (see Figure 8) which encodes Attacin E protein; pLDB12 (see Figure 9) which encodes chicken lysozyme; pLDB14 (see Figure 12) which encodes SB-37 lytic peptide; pLDB16 which encodes T4 phage lysozyme; pLDB18 which encodes genomic cecropin B; pWIShiva-1 which encodes Shiva-1 lytic peptide; pWIP19 which encodes P22 lysozyme gene 19; and pCa2P19 which encodes P22 lysozyme gene 19. The characteristics of these plasmids are set forth below in Table I. TABLE I From Table I and the examples which follow preparation of the plasmid vectors in Table I would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, particularly in view of the Destefano Beltran Thesis, which is hereby incorporated by reference. All these plasmids are disclosed in L. Destefano-Beltran, "Enhancing Bacterial and Fungal Disease Resistance in Plants: Application to Potato," The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Potato, Vayda M.E. and Park W.D. (eds), CAB International, Wallingford, UK pp. 205-221 (1990), which is hereby incorporated by reference. In addition, the following plasmids are also useful for production of lytic peptides: pBPRSl which encodes for the sPRl-Shiva-1 fusion protein, pBCCSl which encodes for the sCEC- Shiva-1 fusion protein, pBPRB37 which encodes for the SPR1-SB37 „ fusion protein, and pBCCB37 which encodes for the SCEC-SB37 fusion protein. See Figure 20. Typically, Agrobacterium spp. are transformed with plasmid vectors by direct uptake of plasmid DNA after chemical and heat treatment, as described by M. Holsters et al., "Transfection and Transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens." Mol Gen Genet 163:181-187 (1978); by direct uptake of plasmid DNA after electroporation, as described by S. Wen-jun and B. Forde, "Efficient Transformation of Agrobacterium spp. by High Voltage Electroporation," Nucleic Acids Res 17:8385 (1989); by triparental conjugational transfer of plasmids from Escherichia coli to Agrobacterium mediated by a Tra+ helper strain as described by G. Ditta et al., "Broad Host Range DNA Cloning System for Gram-negative Bacteria: Construction of a Gene Bank of Rhizobium meliloti." Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:7347-7351 (1981); or by direct conjugational transfer from Escherichia coli to Agrobacterium as described by R. Simon et al., "A Broad Host Range Mobilization System for in vivo Genetic Engineering: Transposon Mutagenesis in Gram-negative Bacteria," Biotechnology 1:784-791 (1982). All of these publications are hereby incorporated by reference. Another approach to transforming pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars with a gene which encodes for a lytic protein is by propelling inert or biologically active particles at cultivar tissues cells. This technique is disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,945,050, 5,036,006, and 5,100,792 all to Sanford et al., which are hereby incorporated by reference. Generally, this procedure involves propelling inert or biologically active particles at the cells of cultivar tissues under conditions effective to penetrate the outer surface of the cell and to be incorporated within the interior thereof. When inert particles are utilized, the vector can be introduced into the cell by coating the particles with the vector encoding the gene for a lytic protein. Alternatively, the target cell can be surrounded by the vector so that the vector is carried into the cell by the wake of the particle. Biologically active particles (e.g., dried bacterium or a bacteriophage, each containing DNA sought to be introduced) can also be propelled into cultivar cell tissue. Once a pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivar is transformed in accordance with the present invention, it is regenerated to form a transgenic pomaceous fruit tree. Generally, regeneration is accomplished by culturing transformed tissue on medium containing the appropriate growth regulators and nutrients to allow for the initiation of shoot meristems. Appropriate antibiotics are added to the regeneration medium to inhibit the growth of Agrobacterium and to select for the development of transformed cells. Following shoot initiation, shoots are allowed to develop in tissue culture and are screened for marker gene activity. The technique of imparting fire blight resistance to pomaceous fruit is useful in conjunction with any member of the Rosaceae family. Of these, apples, pears, and quince are particularly prominent. Other species of the Rosaceae family to which fire blight resistance can be imparted, pursuant to the present invention, include cotoneaster, crataegus, cydonia, pyracantha, and sorbus. For apples, the following cultivars can be treated in accordance with present invention to impart fire blight resistance: Adina, Akane, Anna, Antonovka, Arkansas Black, Bancroft, Beacon, Beaujade, Belle de Boskoop, Big Time, Blushing Golden, Braeburn, Bramley's Seedling, Britegold, Champion, Chenango, Chieftain, Cleopatra, Connel Red, Coromandel Red, Cortland, Cox's Orange Pippin, Crispin, Criterion, Dayton, Delicious (including Red Delicious) , Democrat, Discovery, Dorsett Golden, Dulcet, Earliblaze, Earlidel, Earligold, Early Cortland, Ein Shemer, Elstar, Empire, Empress, Fameuse, Fiesta, Fiorina, Freedom, Fuji, Gala, Galaxy, Geneva Early, Gingergold, Gloster, Golden Russet, Golden Delicious, Golden Supreme, Granny Smith, Gravenstein, Greensleeves, Grimes Golden, Haralson, Hauguan, Haushuai, „ Honeygold, Hatsuaki, Himekami, Hokuto, Idared, Iwakami, James Grieve, Jerseymac, Jonafree, Jonagold, Jonagored, Jonalicious, Jonamac, Jonared, Jonasty, Jonathan, Jonnee, Jored, Karmijn, Kitakami, Laxton's Superb, Liberty, Lodi, Lurared, Lysgolden, Macoun, Maigold, McShay, Mclntosh, Melrose, Mollies Delicious, Monroe, Northern Spy, Northwestern Greening, Nova Easygro, Novamac, Orin, Ozark Gold, Paulared, Pink Lady, Prima, Prime Gold, Primicia, Princessa, Priscilla, PureGold, Rails Janet, Raritan, Red Baron, Redchief, Regent, Reine des Reinettes, Reinette du Canada, R.I. Greening, Rome Beauty, Rubinette, Sansa, Sayaka, Sekai-ichi, Senshu, Shamrock, Shizuka, Sir Prize, Smoothee, Spartan, Stayman, Winesap, Spigold, Splendor, State Fair, Sturmer Pippin, Su merdel, SummerRed, Summer Treat, Sundowner, Sunrise, Sweet Sixteen, Takana, Tompkins King, Tsugaru, Twenty Ounce, Tolman Sweet, Tydeman's Early Worcester, Viking, Vista Bella, Wealthy, Williams Pride, Winesap, Winter Banana, Wolf River, Worcester Pearmain, Yataka, Yellow Newtown, Yoko, York Imperial, 2085, and other Gala X Splendor clones. Suitable apple rootstocks include M.7, M.9, M.26, M.27, MM.106, MM.Ill, Merton 793, Maruba kaido, Budagovsky 9, Mark, Ottawa 3, and seedling (i.e. a rootstock propagated from a seed of unknown parentage) . Suitable European pears (Pyrus communis) include Conference, Williams Bon Cretien (Bartlett) , Dr. Jules Guyot (Limonera) , Blanquilla (Spadona Estiva), Coscia (Ercolini) , Abate Fetel, d'Anjou, Beurre Bosc, Comice, Packham's Triumph, and Passe Crassane. Suitable Asian pears (P. pyrifolia) include Shinseiki, 20th Century, Hosui, Shinko, Chojuro, Kosui, and Niitaka. Suitable pear rootstocks include Pyrus calleryana, P. betulaefolia (Reimer's), Quince, Old Home X Farmingdale, Old Home, and seedling. The following examples are provided to illustrate embodiments of the present invention but are by no means intended to limit its scope. EXAMPLES Example 1 - Formation of Plasmid Vector pLDBlO The plasmid vector pLDBlO, having a gene encoding for the SB-37 lytic protein, was prepared by the process of the Destefano Beltran Thesis, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Essentially this approach requires the enzymatic ligation of synthetic complimentary oligonucleotides with a plasmid. The gene sequence was divided into six fragments. The upper-strand (coding/strand) was composed of three oligonucleotides; SEQ. ID. No. 21 (nucleotide 1-42); SEQ. ID. No. 22 (nucleotide 43-82); SEQ. ID. No. 23 (nucleotide 83-122) and the lower strand, (antisense strand) formed by three oligonucleotides; SEQ. ID. No. 24, SEQ. ID. No. 25, and SEQ. ID. No. 26. The sequence of each fragment is shown below. The first choice for an intermediate vector was pMON530 so the synthetic gene was designed to begin with Bglll and end with .EcoRI cohesive ends. The two restriction sites are shown in bold face: 5' GATCTATGCCGAAATGGAAAGTCTTCAAGAAAATTGAAAAAG 3' SEQ. ID. No. 21 5' TCGGTCGCAACATTCGAAACGGTATTGTCAAGGCTGGACC 3' SEQ. ID. No. 22 5' AGCGATCGCGGTTTTAGGCGAAGCCAAAGCGCTAGGATAA 3' SEQ. ID. No. 23 5' AATGTTGCGACCGACTTTTTCAATTTTCTTGAAGACTTTCCAT TTCGGCATA 3' SEQ. ID. No. 24 5' AAAACCGCGATCGCTGGTCCAGCCTTGACAATACCGTTTCG 3' SEQ. ID. No. 25 5' AATTCTTATCCTAGCGCTTTGGCTTCGCCT 3' SEQ. ID. No. 26 The 6 fragments, having the designation SEQ. ID. Nos. 21-26, are ligated by T4 DNA ligase to form a 120 bp SB-37 fragment. The steps of forming pLDB7 are shown in Figure 10 and described below. After digesting the plasmid vector pMON530 with Bglll and EcoRI and, then, treating with Calf Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase ("CAP"), the six overlapping oligonucleotides which encode the gene for SB-37 are ligated into that fragment to form plasmid vector pLDBl. Plasmid vector pLDBl is then digested with BstEII and Hindlll, and the resulting 3.7kb fragment is recovered. After digesting the plasmid vector pMON200 with BstEII and Hindlll and recovering the resulting 6.5Kb fragment, that fragment is ligated to the 3.7 Kb fragment derived from plasmid vector pLDBl to form plasmid vector pLDB7. Plasmid vector pLDBlO is formed from plasmid vector pLDB7 by the sequence of steps shown in Figure 11. This process is carried out to ensure a ten-fold higher level of expression by constructing a chimeric SB-37 gene with a variant of the CaMV35S promoter. In this process, plasmid vector pLDB7 is digested with EcoRV and SacI to release a truncated (- 90)CaMV35S-SB37-NOS3' fragment that was subcloned into plasmid vector pLDB102. After digesting plasmid vector pLDB102 with EcoRV and SacI, the EcoRV/SacI fragment is ligated into plasmid vector pCa2 to form plasmid vector pLDB103. The Hindlll fragment from plasmid vector pLDB103 was then subcloned into plasmid vector pBH21 to form plasmid vector pLDBlO. Example 2 - Formation of plasmid vector PLDB14 As shown in Figure 12, from the Destefano Beltran Thesis, which is hereby incorporated by reference, plasmid vector pLDBl (formed in Example 1) was digested with Bglll and EcoRI and ligated with the plasmid vector pUC19 after it is digested with Hindi and treated with CAP. The resulting plasmid vector pLDBlOl was then treated with BamHI and Pstl to excise the gene encoding for SB-37 and then cloned into the BamΑI/PstI sites of plasmid vector pIGl to form plasmid vector pLDB141. A chimeric PiIl5'-PiII3' cassette was then excised from the plasmid vector pLDB141 using two Hindlll sites and inserted into the respective site of plasmid vector pBI121 to yield plasmid vector pLDB14. Example 3 - Formation of plasmid vector pLDB15 As set forth in the Destefano Beltran Thesis, which is hereby incorporated by reference, the Attacin E gene is present in plasmid vector pCP521 as a complete cDNA sequence having 564 base pairs of coding sequence and 159 base pairs in the 3' non- coding region (i.e., 723 base pairs) in the PstI site of plasmid vector pBR322. The nucleotide (SEQ. ID. No. 27) and numbered amino acid (SEQ. ID No. 28) sequences of this cDNA together with a restriction map of the insert in the attacin clone pCP521 is shown in Figure 13. The putative polyadenylation signal is underlined in this figure. Figure 14 is a schematic drawing of the steps used to create plasmid vector pLDB202. As shown, the PstI-723 base pair fragment from plasmid vector pCP521 was subcloned into pUC19 (see Figure 12) such that the Banll site of pUC19 was located close to the Banll site at position 11 in the cDNA clone. The resulting plasmid vector pLDB201 was then digested with Banll and then ligated to the 29-mer oligonucleotide, containing a Bglll site followed by a plant consensus AACAATG sequence surrounding an initiation codon and the coding sequence for Aspl-Ala2-His3-Gly4-Ala5 with Banll overhangs, to form plasmid vector pLDB202. Plasmid vector pLDB202 is used to form plasmid vector pLDB15 in accordance with the schematic process drawing of Figure 15. In this phase of the process, the Attacin E coding sequence in plasmid vector pLDB202 is excised from plasmid vector pLDB202 as a BglH/EcoRV fragment and cloned into the BamHI/HincII sites of pIGl to form plasmid vector pLDB151. A chimeric gene fragment, located between the Hindlll sites of plasmid vector pLDB151 was excised and inserted into plasmid vector pBH21 to form plasmid vector pLDB15. Example 4 - Plant Tissue Culture and Transformation with Plasmid Vectors pLDBlO, PLDB14, and PLDB15. The apple cultivar used for transformation was the rootstock M.26. Methods and media used for shoot tip proliferation, and rooted-plant culture are described in J.L. Norelli et al. , "Virulence of Erwinia amylovora Strains to Malus sp. Novole Plants Grown in vitro and in the Greenhouse," Phytopathology; 78:1292-97 (1988), which is hereby incorporated by reference except that the proliferation medium contained 1.0 mg benzyladenine/L, 0.3 mg indolebutyric acid/L, and 0.2 mg gibberellic acid (A 3 90% of total gibberellins) /L. Disarmed A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 (A. Hoekema et al . "A Binary Plant Vector Strategy Based on Separation of vir and T-region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti-plasmid, " Nature 303:179-80 (1983), which are hereby incorporated by reference) containing the binary vectors pBI121 (R.A. Jefferson et al . , "GUS Fusions: B-glucuronidase as a Sensitive and Versatile Gene Fusion Marker in Higher Plants," EMBO J, 6:3901-07 (1987), which are hereby incorporated by reference), pLDBlO, pLDB14, or pLDB15 of Examples 1-3 (L. Destefano-Beltran et al., The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Potato, CAB International, pp. 205-21 (1990), which are hereby incorporated by reference,) were used for plant transformation. The bacteria were grown in Kado 523 broth (C.I. Kado et al. , "Selective Media for Isolation of Agrobacterium, Corynebacterium, Erwinia, Pseudomonas, and Xanthomonas, " Phytopathology, 60:969-76 (1970), which is hereby incorporated by reference), overnight at 28°C, resuspended in 0.5X Murashige-Skoog micro- and macro-elements (T. Murashige, et al., "A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassay with Tobacco Tissue Culture," Physiol Plant, 15:473-97 (1962), which is hereby incorporated by reference), pH 5.4, containing 100 μM acetosyringone, and adjusted to a density of 2 x 10 9 cfu/ml by measuring absorbance at 600 nm. Leaves used for transformation were harvested from 3-wk-old or 8-wk-old rooted in vitro plant cultures. The leaves were fully unfolded yet still in an active stage of leaf expansion. Leaves were sliced transversely into segments 3-5 mm wide with a scalpel, placed in A. tumefaciens inoculum for 5 min., blotted dry, and placed abaxial side up on regeneration medium without antibiotics. Regeneration medium was the modified N 6 medium containing 5 mg benzyladenine/L and 0.1 mg 1-naphthaleneacetic/L as described by M. Welander in "Plant Regeneration from Leaf and Stem Segments of Shoots Raised in vitro from Mature Apple Trees," J. Plant Physiology 132:738-744 (1988), which is hereby incorporated by reference. Plates were incubated in the dark for 48 hours at room temperature to allow for infection and transformation by A. tumefaciens. Leaf segments were then transferred to regeneration medium containing 250 μg/ml cefotaxime or 10 μg/ml paromo ycin and 250 μg/ml cefotaxime. In an additional treatment, leaf segments were transferred to regeneration medium containing 40 μg/ml paromomycin and 250 μg/ml cefotaxime for 4 days and then to regeneration medium containing only cefotaxime. Leaf pieces on regeneration medium were first placed in the dark at room temperature (21-30C) for 2 weeks and then placed at 40 μmol-m 2 -sec -1 , 16 h day at room temperature (21-30C) . In all treatments, leaf segments were transferred to fresh medium after 4 weeks. 9 weeks after inoculation with A. tumefaciens, all regenerating leaf segments were transferred to a baby food jar containing the same regeneration medium (50 ml) on which they were previously cultured. Four weeks later, regenerating cultures were divided into pieces containing 1 or a few meristems and were placed on proliferation medium containing ^ 50 μg/ml kanamycin. Shoot tips that remained green on kanamycin medium after 6 weeks were screened for GUS activity. The presence of GUS in putative transgenic plants was determined using a fluorometric assay based on the cleavage of 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide ("MUG") to 4-methylumbelliferone ("MU"), as described by R.A. Jefferson et al., "GUS Fusions: β-glucuronidase as a Sensitive and Versatile Gene Fusion Marker in Higher Plants," EMBO J., 6:3901-07 (1987), which is hereby incorporated by reference. In preliminary assays 50 to 150 mg fresh weight of leaf tissue was ground in 500 μl extraction buffer (Id. ) . 100 μl aliquots of the leaf extracts were mixed with 100 μl of 2 mM MUG in a multiwell microtiter dish. The mixture was incubated at 37°C overnight, and observed under ultraviolet light for fluorescence. Quantitative GUS assays were conducted as described by R. A. Jefferson (Id.) except that 20 μl aliquots were removed at sample times, four sample times were used to calculate rates of activity, and assays were run for up to 200 min. Quantitative GUS data was normalized by a log transformation. The accumulation of MU over time was linear and did not approach an asymptote or depart from linearity during the assay time period. A histochemical assay for the localization of GUS activity was performed, as described by R.A. Jefferson et al. , "GUS Fusions: β-glucuronidase as a Sensitive and Versatile Gene Fusion Marker in Higher Plants," EMBO J. , 6:3901-07 (1987), which is hereby incorporated by reference, except that hand sections were not fixed in formaldehyde prior to treatment with 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronic acid ("X-gluc") . nptll activity was assayed by evaluating the ability of in vitro grown shoot tips to root in the presence of 25 or 50 μg/ml kanamycin. A single baby food jar of rooting medium containing 5 shoot tips was the unit of replication. There were 5 to 25 jars per treatment. To conduct a Southern analysis, plant DNA was isolated from fresh leaf tissue using a modification of the N.J. Gawel, ' "A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure for Musa and I omoea, " Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 9:262-66 (1991), which is hereby incorporated by reference, procedure. Modifications were 1) the leaf tissue-extraction buffer mixture was incubated at 37°C for 45 min and 2) following treatment of DNA with RNAse, the DNA was treated with Proteinase K (1.5 mg/ml) at 55°C for 90 min. 10 μg genomic DNA was digested with Hindlll, separated by size through a 1% agarose gel in Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer at 1.1 V/cm for 16 hours, transferred to GeneScreenPlus (DuPont Co., Boston, MA) under alkaline conditions, hybridized at 65°C in aqueous solution with 200 ηg of 32 P labeled DNA probe with a specific activity > 10 9 cpm/μg, and washed at high stringency (J. Sambrook et al. , Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (2nd ed. 1989) , which is hereby incorporated by reference) . The attacin probe was the 2.2 kb Hindlll fragment of pLDB15 and consisted of the 5' and 3' region of the proteinase inhibitor II gene from potato and the attacin gene. The GUS probe was the approximately 2.1 kb BamHI-EcoRI fragment of pBH21 and consisted of the GUS gene and the nopaline synthase terminator from A. tumefaciens. The nptll probe was the approximately 1.9 kb PstI fragment of pBI121 and consisted of most of the nptll gene and the nopaline synthase terminator. Example 5 - Recovery of Transgenic Plant. A M.26 transgenic line, designated Tl, was obtained that contains the gene encoding Attacin E protein. Tl was obtained from a M.26 leaf segment harvested from an 8-wk-old rooted in vitro plant culture, inoculated with LBA4404 (pLDB15) , and was selected on medium containing 10 μg/ml paromomycin and 250 μg/ml cefotaxime. Although Tl was obtained from a leaf harvested from an 8-wk-old plant, a significantly higher proportion of leaf segments from 3-wk-old rooted plants regenerated (0.22) than did those from 8-wk-old plants (0.11) (F=7.98, df=l, 63) . There was no significant difference in the ' ' proportion of leaf segments that regenerated when cultured on medium containing 250 μg/ml cefotaxime (0.23), 10 μg/ml paromomycin and 250 μg/ml cefotaxime (0.16), or 40 μg/ml paromomycin and 250 μg/ml cefotaxime for 4 days and then 250 μg/ml cefotaxime (0.12) (F=2.63, df=2, 62) . There was no significant difference in the portion of leaf segments that yielded transgenic plants when leaves were harvested from 3-wk-old (0.0) or from 8-wk-old plants (0.0033) (F=1.17, df=l, 63); nor when leaf segments were cultured on medium containing only cefotaxime (0.0), 10 μg/ml paromomycin plus cefotaxime (0.0083), or 40 μg/ml paromomycin plus cefotaxime for 4 days and then only cefotaxime (0.0) (F=0.91, df=2, 62) . There were a high number of non-transgenic escapes that regenerated on medium containing paromomycin to select for nptll transgenic plants. Only 1 of 36 regenerants from medium with 10 μg/ml paromomycin was transgenic (2.2%), and none of 25 regenerants cultured on medium with 40 μg/ml paromomycin for 4 days were transgenic. Failure to attain a significant difference in the proportion of leaf segments that regenerated when cultured on medium with non-paromomycin versus on medium containing paromomycin indicates that the selection pressure used in this experiment was too low. Recent studies have indicated that continuous selection with 25 to 63 μg/ml paromomycin was optimal to select for nptll transgenic M.26 cells. As shown in Table II, transgenic line Tl possessed nptll and GUS activity, while non-transgenic M.26 did not. TABLE II "Ability of tissue culture shoots to root in the presence of kanamycin. Rooting was observed after 4 weeks of cultivation on rooting media and is expressed as a percent of rooting that occurred in the absence of antibiotics (76% and 48% for M.26 and Tl, respectively) . b Rate of MUG to MU conversion (ηmoles/min/mg fresh weight) as determined by fluorometric assay. Analysis of variance of nptll activity indicated a significant difference between the nptll activity of M.26 and Tl (F-51.56, df=l, 146) and a significant cultivar by kanamycin concentration interaction (F=57.72, df=2, 142), indicating that M.26 and Tl responded differently to the presence of kanamycin in rooting medium. Analysis of variance of GUS activity indicated a significant difference between the GUS activity of M.26 and Tl (F=13.35, df=l, 14) . The Agrobacterium binary vector used in the transformation of Tl, pLDB15 (L. Destefano-Beltran et al. , The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Potato, CAB International, pp. 205-21 (1990), which is hereby incorporated by reference) , contains an approximately 2400 bp fragment inserted in the Hindlll site of pBI121 (R.A. Jefferson et al . , "GUS Fusions: β-glucuronidase as a Sensitive and Versatile Gene Fusion Marker in Higher Plants," EMBO J. 6:3091-07 (1987), which is hereby incorporated by reference) (Figure 15) . This insert contains 1.3 kb of the 5' region of the proteinase inhibitor II gene from potato, a 640 bp Attacin E gene, and approximately 300 bp of the 3' region of the proteinase inhibitor II gene. The ordered arrangement of pLDB15 T-DNA is right T-DNA border, nptll gene, 2400 bp Attacin E Hindlll fragment, GUS gene, and left T-DNA border (Figure 15) . Since the Attacin E gene is flanked by Hindlll sites on the T-DNA • - transferred to the plant during Agrobacterium mediated transformation, digestion of either plasmid DNA or transgenic genomic plant DNA should result in a 2400 bp fragment that hybridizes with the Attacin E gene probe. Southern hybridization analysis of Tl indicated that a ca. 2400 bp fragment from pLDB15 (Fig. 16A, lane 3) and Tl (lane 5) but not pBI121 (lane 2) or M.26 (lane 4) hybridized with the attacin gene probe (Fig. 16A) . Since the GUS gene is flanked by T-DNA left border and a Hindlll site, hybridization of GUS to plasmid DNA and transgenic genomic DNA digested with Hindlll should result in hybridizing fragments of different sizes. The pLDB15 DNA fragment that hybridizes with GUS gene probe should be the same size as the pBI121 hybridizing fragment (Fig. 16A) . The size of the hybridizing fragment in transgenic genomic DNA will be of unknown size because it will include both T-DNA (Hindlll site to T-DNA left border) and plant DNA (site of integration to next plant Hindlll site) . Similarly, nptll is flanked by T- DNA right border and a Hindlll site and hybridization of nptll to transgenic genomic DNA digested with Hindlll should result in a hybridizing fragment of different size from either plasmid DNA or that which hybridizes with GUS. Hybridization of Hindlll digested pBI121 and pLDB15 DNA indicated that a fragment the approximate size of pBI121 hybridized with the GUS gene probe (Fig. 16B, lanes 2 and 3) and the nptll probe (Fig. 16B, lanes 2 and 3) . Hybridization of Tl genomic DNA indicated that a fragment of unique size (approximately 7.5 kb) hybridized with the GUS probe. A fragment the size of pBI121 also hybridized with GUS gene probe in M.26 and Tl genomic DNA samples. This band was probably due to contamination of genomic DNA samples with pBI121. Contamination of genomic DNA could have occurred by colonization of plant tissue with A. tumefaciens containing pBI121, contamination during DNA isolations, or migration of DNA sample during gel electrophoresis. However, despite the presence of contaminating pBH21 in plant genomic DNA samples, the presence in Tl genomic DNA of a unique fragment that hybridizes with GUS (Fig. 16B, lane 5; 7.5 kb) is proof of Tl transformation. Transformation of Tl is supported by hybridization with the nptll probe (Fig. 16C) . Hybridization of Tl genomic DNA with the nptll probe resulted in the hybridization of 2 fragments of unique size (approximately 5.9 and 3.4 kb) (Fig. 16C, lane 5) . This may indicate a duplication of the nptll gene during the transformation process. The shadow 7.5 kb fragment (Fig. 16C, lane 5) is the GUS fragment that has hybridized with the nopaline synthase terminator common to both the GUS gene and the nptll probe. As with the GUS probe, hybridization of M.26 and Tl genomic DNA samples with the nptll probe indicate contamination with pBH21. Example 6 - Stability of Transgenic Genotype. Since apple is vegetatively propagated and sexual crosses result in the loss of cultivar characteristics, the RO generation of transgenic plants will most likely be used to select improved cultivars. Therefore, the stability of the RO transgenic genotype is important. To test the stability of Tl's transgenic genotype, plants were regenerated from Tl leaf segments without any aminoglycoside selection for nptll and then evaluated ' for the presence of GUS and nptll marker genes. GUS activity in Tl regenerants was evaluated using a qualitative fluorometric assay for the conversion of MUG to MU, and nptll activity was evaluated by testing the ability of regenerants to root in medium containing 25 μg/ml kanamycin. Of 40 Tl regenerants evaluated, all 40 had both positive GUS and nptll activity. Histochemical observation of Tl leaf tissue did not indicate any evidence of chimera. GUS activity was observed in all cell layers of transversely sectioned leaves. Likewise, when five successive leaves on a stem were assayed, leaves from all phyllotactic sections had GUS activity throughout. In addition, in more than 25 successive vegetative in vitro propagations of Tl on shoot tip proliferation medium without aminoglycoside selection, there has been no apparent loss of GUS or nptll activity. Regeneration tests, histochemical observation, and observed stability of Tl transgenic genotype after propagation and growth without selection indicate that Tl is not chimeric and is genetically stable. Example 7 - Fire blight resistance of Transgenic Apple Determined in vitro In vitro grown plants of transgenic Tl were evaluated for their resistance to fire blight. Tissue culture plants were inoculated with Erwinia amylovora, the casual agent of fire blight, as previously described by Norelli et al., "Virulence of Erwinia amylovora Strains to Malus sp. Novole plants Grown in vitro and in the Greenhouse," Phytopathology: 78:1292-97 (1988), which is hereby incorporated by reference, except that inoculum was prepared at 5 or more various concentrations ranging from 1 x 10 4 to 1 x 10 cfu/ml. The inoculum dose necessary for 50% of the plants to become infected with Erwinia amylovora (mean ID50 in units of loglO cfu/ml) was calculated by a probit procedure (SAS, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and used as a measure of plant resistance. The greater the inoculum dose necessary for 50% of the plants to become infected, the more resistant the cultivar to fire blight. The cultivars M.26 and Liberty were included in evaluations as susceptible and resistant standard cultivars, respectively. Erwinia amylovora strain Ea273 was used for inoculum. Evaluations were repeated three times and ID50 values were averaged for the three evaluations. As seen in Figure 17, Tl, M.26 (parent cultivar), and Liberty (fire blight resistant cultivar) had ID50 ratings of 5.4, 4.4, and 5.6, respectively, indicating that the fire blight resistance of the Tl transgenic containing the gene • ' encoding the Attacin E protein had increased in comparison to the susceptible parent cultivar M.26. Example 8 - Fire Blight Resistance of Transgenic Apple Plants In vitro propagated plants of Tl were adapted to growth in the greenhouse and grown as single shoot plants. Plants were evaluated for their fire blight resistance by determining the percent of the shoot length that developed symptoms after inoculation with Erwinia amylovora. Inoculations were as previously described by H.S. Aldwinckle and J.L. Preczewski, "Reaction of Terminal Shoots of Apple Cultivars to Invasion by Erwinia amylovora," Phytopathology 66:1439-44 (1976), which is hereby incorporated by reference, except that inoculum concentration was 5 x 10 6 cfu/ml. The cultivar M.26 was included as a susceptible standard cultivar. Erwinia amylovora strain Ea273 was used for inoculum. Figure 18 shows the disease progress over time in the transgenic, Tl, and the parent cultivar M.26. Tl developed less disease at a slower rate than M.26. The slopes of the disease progress curve for M.26 and Tl are significantly different from day 3 thru day 16 (T=-2.37, df=124, p=0.019; based on slopes weighted to 1/x due to non-normality of x values), indicating that Tl was more resistant to fire blight. Such rate-reducing resistance is a well known indicator of a plant's ability to suppress the rate of epidemic development, as noted in W. Fry, Principles of Plant Disease Management, pp. 203-04, 219-34 (1982), which is hereby incorporated by reference. Although this type of resistance can be overwhelmed by environmental conditions favorable for disease development or by large pathogen populations, it is frequently employed for disease management and can be t effectively integrated with other management techniques (Id. pp. 228-231) . This has been demonstrated in the control of late blight of potato caused by Phytophthora infestans where rate-reducing resistance was effectively combined with chemical control practices and the effect of the rate-reducing resistance used was quantified to be equivalent to 0.5 to 0.7 kilogram fungicide/hectare (W.E. Fry, "Integrated Effects of Polygenic Resistance and a Protective Fungicide on Development of Potato Late Blight," Phytopathology 65:908-911 (1975), which is hereby incorporated by reference, and W.E. Fry, "Quantification of General Resistance of Potato Cultivars and Fungicide Effects for Integrated Control of Potato Late Blight," Phytopathology 68:1650-1655 (1978), which is hereby incorporated by reference. In the case of fire blight infection of apple rootstocks, rate reducing resistance can slow disease development sufficiently for the plant to survive infection. After the initiation of infection, lesion extension will be inhibited by unfavorable conditions in the fall and winter. Rate-reducing resistance can retard lesion extension sufficiently to prevent lesions from girdling the rootstock crown. Tree loss would then be averted. This would be a significant benefit for M.26 and other susceptible apple rootstocks. Example 9 - Northern Analysis of Expression of the Attacin E. gene in Tl Expression of the gene encoding Attacin E in Tl was demonstrated by northern analysis that indicated the presence of Attacin E messenger RNA (mRNA) in Tl. Leaves were harvested from Tl plants that had been inoculated with Erwinia amylovora, the fire blight pathogen, 72 hours prior to leaf harvest and total RNA was isolated from leaf tissue. Since the vast majority of eucaryotic mRNAs are poly adenylated at their 3' termini, mRNA was purified from the bulk of cellular RNA by affinity chromatography on oligo(dT)- cellulose. Poly (A) RNA was then fractionated under denaturing conditions by electrophoresis though an agarose gel containing formaldehyde. Fractioned RNA was then vacuum blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane and hybridized with radioactively labeled Attacin E DNA probe. The Attacin E probe was the 2400 bp Attacin E Hindlll fragment of pLDB15. Expression of Attacin E is supported by hybridization of the Attacin E probe to a fragment present in Tl mRNA that is not present in M.26 mRNA (see Fig. 19) . Example 10 - Formation of Plasmid Vector pBPRSl The plasmid vector pBPRSl (see Figure 20) was constructed so that genes encoding the cecropin B-like peptide Shiva-1 was fused to transit signal peptide sPRl, to allow for export of cecropins from the plant cell, and the genes were placed under the control of an enhanced 35S promoter of CaMV (Ca 2 35S) . In brief, the gene encoding Shiva-1 was synthesized from overlapping synthetic oligomers that were cloned into a vector plasmid. Overlapping synthetic oligomers encoding the sPRl transit signal peptide of the pathogenesis-related protein lb from tobacco, Denecke, J., Botterman, J., and Deblaere, R., "Protein Secretion in Plant Cells can Occur via a Default Pathway," The Plant Cell 2:51-59 (1990), which is hereby incorporated by reference, were then fused to the 5' end of the Shiva-1 gene. DNA fragments encoding the fusion peptides (SEQ. ID. No. 17) were then subcloned into pCa2, Kay, R., Chan, A., Daly, M., and McPherson, Jr., "Duplication of CaMV35S Promoter Sequences Creates a Strong Enhancer for Plant Genes," Science 236:1299-1302 (1987), which is hereby incorporated by reference, to produce Hindlll cassettes containing 5' to 3' the enhanced Ca 2 35S promoter, the fusion peptide coding regions, and the nopaline synthase terminator of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The cassettes were then subcloned into the Hindlll site of the A. tumefaciens binary plasmid vector pBH21 to produce pBPRSl (sPRl/Shiva-1 fusion) . Example 11 - Isolation of Transgenic Apple Plants Containing Genes Encoding Cecropin B-like Peptides. Transgenic apple rootstocks containing cecropin B-like lytic peptides are derived from the apple rootstock Mailing 26 (M.26) by Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated gene transfer. Transgenic T2 contains a gene encoding the SB-37 peptide under the control of an enhanced CaMV 35S promoter and was selected using the binary plasmid vector pLDBlO formed in Example 1. Transgenics T3, T4, T5, T6, and T7 contain a gene encoding the Shiva-1 peptide fused to the sPRl transit signal peptide of the pathogenesis-related protein lb from tobacco. The gene encoding the fusion peptide is under the control of an enhanced CaMV 35S promoter. Transgenics T2 to T7 were selected using the binary plasmid vector pBPRSl, prepared in accordance with Example 10. The methods and media used for the A. tumefaciens mediated gene transfer are described in Example 4, with the following exceptions. Exception 1: Regeneration medium for T2, T5, and T7 consisted of the major and minor element salt mixture described by T. Murashige and F. Skoog, "A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassay with Tobacco Tissue Culture," Phvsiol Plant 15:473-497 (1962), which is hereby incorporated by reference, 100 mg myo-inositol/L, 0.4 mg thiamine-HCl/L, 30 g sucrose/L, 1 mg thidiazuron/L, 0.5 mg indoleacetic acid/L, and 7 g agar/L. Regeneration medium for T3, T4, and T6 was as described for T2 except agar was replaced with 2.5 g gelrite/L. Exception 2: The A. tumefaciens strain used for the transformation of T3 was EHA105. Exception 3: A tumefaciens inoculum consisted of a 48 hour culture grown on medium containing 10 grams bacto- tryptone/L, 5 grams yeast extract/L, 5 grams sodium chloride/L, and 50 mg kanamycin/L. Inoculum was suspended as described in Example 4. Inoculum used to transform T3 was suspended in the simplified induction medium described by J. Alt-Morbe, H. Kuhlmann, and J. Schroder, "Differences in Induction of Ti Plasmid Virulence Genes virG and virD, and Continued Control of virD Expression by Four External Factors," Molecular Plant- Microbe Interactions 2:301-308, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Exception 4: Cocultivation medium consisted of regeneration medium plus 100 μM acetosyringone and 1 mM betaine phosphate. Exception 5: During the cocultivation of T3, inoculated leaf pieces were incubated in the dark for 72 hours at room temperature, not 48 hours, to allow for infection and transformation by A. tumefaciens. Exception 6: After cocultivation, treated leaf segments were transferred to regeneration medium containing: for T2, 250 μg cefotaxime/ml and 20 μg paromomycin/ml; for T3, 350 μg cefotaxime/ml and 100 μg kanamycin/ml; for T4 and T6, 250 μg cefotaxime/ml and 40 μg paromomycin/ml; and for T5 and T7, 250 μg cefotaxime/ml and 100 μg kanamycin/ml. Following regeneration of meristematic tissue from treated leaf pieces, meristems were transfered to a jnodified regeneration medium containing Murashige and Skoog major and minor element salt mixture, 100 mg myo-inositol/L, 0.4 mg thiamine-HCl/L, 30 g sucrose/L, 1 mg benzyladenine/L, 0.5 mg naphthaleneacetic acid/L, and 7 g agar/L and incubated under high light (40 to 60 μmol/m2/sec) at 22C for one month. Meristems were then transfered to the proliferation medium described by J.L. Norelli et al., "Virulence of Erwinia amylovora Strains to Malus sp, Novole Plants Grown in vitro and in the Greenhouse," Phytopathology 78:1292-97 (1988), which is hereby incorporated by reference, containing 100 μg paromomycin /ml. Shoots that grew on this medium were harvested and screened for beta-glucuronidase (GUS) activity. The presence of GUS was determined using a fluorometric assay based on the cleavage of 4-methylumbelliferl-β-D- glucuronide (MUG) to 4-methylumbelliferone. 50 to 150 mg fresh weight of leaf tissue was ground in 500 μl of the extraction buffer described by R.A. Jefferson et al., "GUS Fusions: β- glucuronidase as a Sensitive and Versatile Gene Fusion Marker in Higher Plants," EMBO J. 6:3901, which is hereby incorporated by reference. 50 μl aliquots of the leaf extracts were mixed with 50 μl of 2 mM MUG in a multiwell microtiter dish. The mixture was incubated at 37C overnight,and observed under ultraviolet light for fluorescence. Transgenics were identified and propagated from shoot tips that resulted in positive GUS activity. Only one transgenic was selected from a single treated leaf piece. Although the invention has been described in detail for the purpose of illustration, it is understood that such detail is solely for that purpose, and variations can be made therein by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention which is defined by the following claims. SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INFORMATION: (i) APPLICANT: Aldwinckle, Herbert S. Norelli, John L. (ii) TITLE OF INVENTION: TRANSGENIC POMACEOUS FRUIT WITH FIRE BLIGHT RESISTANCE (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 28 (iv) CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: (A) ADDRESSEE: Michael L. Goldman (B) STREET: Clinton Square, P.O. Box 1051 (C) CITY: Rochester (D) STATE: New York (E) COUNTRY: U.S.A. (F) ZIP: 14603 (V) COMPUTER READABLE FORM: (A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk (B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS (D) SOFTWARE: PatentIn Release #1.0, Version #1.25 (vi) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: (B) FILING DATE: (C) CLASSIFICATION: (Vii) PRIOR APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: US 07/954,347 (B) FILING DATE: 30-SEP-1992 (viii) ATTORNEY/AGENT INFORMATION: (A) NAME: Goldman Mr., Michael L. (B) REGISTRATION NUMBER: 30,727 (C) REFERENCE/DOCKET NUMBER: 19603/00140 (ix) TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION: (A) TELEPHONE: (716)263-1304 (B) TELEFAX: (716)-263-1600 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:l: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 396 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:l: TGCCGTTCGC AGTTCGCTTT GCATTGCGAT GCGAAACGTT TCACGAGATG CGGGTTAGTG 60 CAGGAGCTTA GGAGACGAGG CTTCGATGAA ACTTTGATGA GTAACTGGGT CTGCCTTGTC 120 GAGAACGAAA GCGGACGGTT TACCGATAAA ATCGGTAAAG TTAACAAGAA CGGATCTCGA 180 GACTACGGCC TCTTCCAGAT CAATGACAAA TACTGGTGCA GTAAGGGATC CACTCCTGGA 240 AAGGATTGCA ACGTGACTTG TAATCAGCTA CTGACTGACG ACATTAGCGT GGCAGCTACG 300 ' TGCGCGAAGA AGATTTACAA ACGCCACAAG TTTGACGCTT GGTACGGATG GAAAAATCAC 360 TGTCAACATG GACTGCCAGA TATTAGCGAC TGTTAG 396 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 131 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2: Cys Arg Ser Gin Phe Ala Leu His Cys Asp Ala Lys Arg Phe Thr Arg 1 5 10 15 Cys Gly Leu Val Gin Glu Leu Arg Arg Arg Gly Phe Asp Glu Thr Leu 20 25 30 Met Ser Asn Trp Val Cys Leu Val Glu Asn Glu Ser Gly Arg Phe Thr 35 40 45 Asp Lys He Gly Lys Val Asn Lys Asn Gly Ser Arg Asp Tyr Gly Leu 50 55 60 Phe Gin He Asn Asp Lys Tyr Trp Cys Ser Lys Gly Ser Thr Pro Gly 65 70 75 8 Lys Asp Cys Asn Val Thr Cys Asn Gin Leu Leu Thr Asp Asp He S 85 90 95 Val Ala Ala Thr Cys Ala Lys Lys He Tyr Lys Arg His Lys Phe A 100 105 110 Ala Trp Tyr Gly Trp Lys Asn His Cys Gin His Gly Leu Pro Asp 115 120 125 Ser Asp Cys 130 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO.:3: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 583 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown ( ii ) MOLECULE TYPE : DNA (genomic) ( i ) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION : SEQ ID NO: 3 : AGTCCCGCTG TGTGTACGAC ACTGGCAACA TGAGGTCTTT GCTAATCTTG GTGCTTTGCT 60 TCCTGCCCCT GGCTGCTCTG GGGAAAGTCT TTGGACGATG TGAGCTGGCA GCGGCTATGA 120 AGCGTCACGG ACTTGATAAC TATCGGGGAT ACAGCCTGGG AAACTGGGTG TGTGTTGCAA 180 AATTCGAGAG TAACTTCAAC ACCCAGGCTA CAAACCGTAA CACCGATGGG AGTACCGACT 240 ACGGAATCCT ACAGATCAAC AGCCGCTGGT GGTGCAACGA TGGCAGGACC CCAGGCTCCA 300 GGAACCTGTG CAACATCCCG TGCTCAGCCC TGCTGAGCTC AGACATAACA GCGAGCGTGA 360 ACTGCGCGAA GAAGATCGTC AGCGATGGAA ACGGCATGAG CGCGTGGGTC GCCTGGCGCA 420 ACCGCAAGGG TACCGACGTC CAGGCGTGGA TCAGAGGCTG CCGGCTGTGA GGAGCTGCCG 480 CACCJCGGCCC GCCCGCTGCA CAGCCGGCCG CTTTGCGAGC GCGACGCTAC CCGCTTGGCA 540 GCT GTTTTAAACG CATCCCTCAT TAAAACGACT ATACGCAAAC GCC 583 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:4: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 147 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:4: Met Arg Ser Leu Leu He Leu Val Leu Cys Phe Leu Pro Leu Ala Ala ..1 5 10 15 Leu Gly Lys Val Phe Gly Arg Cys Glu Leu Ala Ala Ala Met Lys Arg 20 25 30 His Gly Leu Asp Asn Tyr Arg Gly Tyr Ser Leu Gly Asn Trp Val Cys 35 40 45 Val Ala Lys Phe Glu Ser Asn Phe Asn Thr Gin Ala Thr Asn Arg Asn 50 55 60 Thr Asp Gly Ser Thr Asp Tyr Gly He Leu Gin He Asn Ser Arg Trp 65 70 75 80 Trp Cys Asn Asp Gly Arg Thr Pro Gly Ser Arg Asn Leu Cys Asn He 85 90 95 Pro Cys Ser Ala Leu Leu Ser Ser Asp He Thr Ala Ser Val Asn Cys 100 105 110 Ala Lys Lys He Val Ser Asp Gly Asn Gly Met Ser Ala Trp Val Ala 115 120 125 Trp Arg Asn Arg Cys Lys Gly Thr Asp Val Gin Ala Trp He Arg Gly 130 135 140 Cys Arg Leu 145 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:5: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 570 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:5: GACGCGCACG GAGCCCTTAC GCTCAACTCC GATGGTACCT CTGGTGCTGT GGTTAAAGTA 60 CCCTTTGCTG GTAACGACAA GAATATAGTA AGCGCTATCG GTTCCGTAGA CTTAACTGAT 120 AGGCAGAAAC TAGGCGCTGC AACCGCTGGA GTGGCACTGG ATAATATAAA CGGTCACGGA 180 CTAAGTCTCA CGGATACACA CATCCCCGGG TTCGGAGACA AGATGACAGC AGCCGGCAAA 240 GTGAATGTCT TCCACAATGA TAACCACGAC ATCACAGCGA AGGCTTTCGC CACCAGAAAC 300 * ATGCCGGATA TTGCTAATGT ACCTAATTTC AACACTGTCG GTGGCGGAAT AGACTATATG 360 TTCAAAGATA AGATTGGTGC ATCTGCGAGC GCCGCTCACA CGGACTTTAT CAATCGCAAC 420 GACTACTCTC TTGACGGGAA ACTGAACCTC TTCAAGACTC CTGATACCTC GATTGATTTC 480 AACGCCGGTT TCAAGAAGTT CGATACACCT TTCATGAAGT CCTCTTGGGA GCCTAACTTC 540 GGATTCTCAC TTTCTAAATA TTTCTGATTA 570 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:6: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 188 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:6: Asp Ala His Gly Ala Leu Thr Leu Asn Ser Asp Gly Thr Ser Gly Ala 1 5 10 15 Val Val Lys Val Pro Phe Ala Gly Asn Asp Lys Asn He Val Ser Ala 20 25 30 He Gly Ser Val Asp Leu Thr Asp Arg Gin Lys Leu Gly Ala Ala Thr 35 40 45 Ala Gly Val Ala Leu Asp Asn He Asn Gly His Gly Leu Ser Leu Thr 50 55 60 Asp Thr His He Pro Gly Phe Gly Asp Lys Met Thr Ala Ala Gly Lys 65 70 75 80 Val Asn Val Phe His Asn Asp Asn His Asp He Thr Ala Lys Ala Phe 85 90 95 Ala Thr Arg Asn Met Pro Asp He Ala Asn Val Pro Asn Phe Asn Thr 100 105 110 Val Gly Gly Gly He Asp Tyr Met Phe Lys Asp Lys He Gly Ala Ser 115 120 125 Ala Ser Ala Ala His Thr Asp Phe He Asn Arg Asn Asp Tyr Ser Leu 130 135 140 Asp Gly Lys Leu Asn Leu Phe Lys Thr Pro Asp Thr Ser He Asp Phe 145 150 155 160 Asn Ala Gly Phe Lys Lys Phe Asp Thr Pro Phe Met Lys Ser Ser Trp 165 170 175 Glu Pro Asn Phe Gly Phe Ser Leu Ser Lys Tyr Phe 180 185 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:7: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 37 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:7: Lys Trp Lys Leu Phe Lys Lys He Glu Lys Val Gly Gin Asn He Arg 1 5 10 15 Asp Gly He He Lys Ala Gly Pro Ala Val Ala Val Val Gly Gin Ala 20 25 30 Thr Gin He Ala Lys 35 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:8: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 186 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:8: ATGAATTTCT CAAGGATATT TTTCTTCGTG TTCGCTTTGG TTCTGGCTTC AACAGTTTCG 60 GCTGCACCGG AGCCGAAATG GAAAGTCTTC AAGAAAATTG AAAAAATGGG TCGCAACATT 120 CGAAACCGTA TTGTCAAGGC TGGACCAGCG ATCGCGGTTT TAGGCGAAGC CAAAGCGCTA 180 GGATAA 186 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:9: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 61 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:9: Met Asn Phe Ser Arg He Phe Phe Phe Val Phe Ala Leu Val Leu Ala 1 5 10 15 Ser Thr Val Ser Ala Ala Pro Glu Pro Lys Trp Lys Val Phe Lys Lys 20 25 30 He Glu Lys Met Gly Arg Asn He Arg Asn Gly He Val Lys Ala Gly 35 40 45 Pro Ala He Ala Val Leu Gly Glu Ala Lys Ala Leu Gly 50 55 60 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:10: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 36 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide ( i) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:10: Trp Asn Pro Phe Lys Glu Leu Glu Lys Val Gly Gin Arg Val Arg Asp 1 5 10 15 Ala Val He Ser Ala Gly Pro Ala Val Ala Thr Val Ala Asn Ala Thr 20 25 30 Ala Leu Ala Lys 35 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:11: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 37 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:11: Met Pro Arg Trp Arg Leu Phe Arg Arg He Asp Arg Val Gly Lys Gin 1 5 10 15 He Lys Gin He Leu Arg Ala Gly Pro Ala He Ala Leu Val Gly Asp 20 25 30 Ala Arg Ala Val Gly 35 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:12: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 38 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION^ SEQ ID NO:12: Met Pro Lys Trp Lys Val Phe Lys Lys He Glu Lys Val Gly Arg Asn 1 5 10 15 He Arg Asn Gly He Val Lys Ala Gly Pro Ala He Ala Val Leu Gly 20 25 30 Glu Ala Lys Ala Leu Gly 35 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:13: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 210 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:13: ATGAACTTTT CTAGGATCTT CTTTTTCGTG TTCGCTCTTG TTCTCGCCTT GTCCACTGTG 60 TCTGCCGCTC CTGACATGCC GCGCTGGCGT CTGTTCCGCC GTATCGACCG TGTTGGCAAA 120 CAGATCAAAC AGGGTATCCT GCGTGCTGGC CCGGCTATCG CTCTGGTTGG CGACGCCCGC 180 GCAGTTGGTT GAGAATTCGC TAGCAAGCTT 210 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:14: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 63 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:14: Met Asn Phe Ser Arg He Phe Phe Phe Val Phe Ala Leu Val Leu Ala 1 5 10 15 Leu Ser Thr Val Ser Ala Ala Pro Asp Met Pro Arg Trp Arg Leu Phe 20 _, 25 30 Arg Arg He Asp Arg Val Gly Lys Gin He Lys Gin Gly He Leu Arg 35 40 45 Ala Gly Pro Ala He Ala Leu Val Gly Asp Ala Arg Ala Val Gly 50 55 60 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:15: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 207 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:15: ATGAACTTTT CTAGGATCTT CTTTTTCGTG TTCGCTCTTG TTCTCGCCTT GTCCACTGTG 60 TCTGCCGCTC CTGAGCCGAA ATGGAAAGTC TTCAAGAAAA TTGAAAAAGT CGGTCGCAAC 120 ATTCGAAACG GTATTGTCAA GGCTGGACCA GCGATCGCGG TTTTAGGCGA AGCCAAAGCG 180 CTAGGATAAG AATTCGCTAG CAAGCTT 207 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:16: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 62 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:16: Met Asn Phe Ser Arg He Phe Phe Phe Val Phe Ala Leu Val Leu Ala 1 5 10 15 Leu Ser Thr Val Ser Ala Ala Pro Glu Pro Lys Trp Lys Val Phe Lys 20 25 30 Lys He Glu Lys Val Gly Arg Asn He Arg Asn Gly He Val Lys Ala 35 40 45 Gly Pro Ala He Ala Val Leu Gly Glu Ala Lys Ala Leu Gly 50 55 60 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:17: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 216 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:17: ATGGGATTTT TCCTTTTTTC TCAAATGCCA TCCTTCTTTC TCGTGTCCAC TCTTCTCCTT 60 TTCCTCATTA TCTCTCACTC CTCTCATGCT ACCATGCCGC GCTGGCGTCT GTTCCGCCGT 120 ATCGACCGTG TTGGCAAACA GATCAAACAG GGTATCCTGC GTGCTAGCCC GGCTATCGCT 180 CGTGTTGGCG ACGCCCGCGC AGTTGGTTGA GAATTC 216 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:18: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 69 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:18: Met Gly Phe Phe Leu Phe Ser Glu Met Pro Ser Phe Phe Leu Val Ser 1 5 10 15 Thr Leu Leu Leu Phe Leu He He Ser His Ser Ser Ala Ala Thr Met 20 25 30 Pro Arg Trp Arg Leu Phe Arg Arg He Asp Arg Val Gly Lys Gin He 35 40 45 Lys Gin Gly He Leu Arg Ala Gly Pro Ala He Ala Leu Val Gly Asp 50 55 60 Ala Arg Ala Val Gly 65 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:19: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 213 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:19: ATGGGATTTT TCCTTTTTTC TCAAATGCCA TCCTTCTTTC TCGTGTCCAC TCTTCTCCTT 60 TTCCTCATTA TCTCTCACTC CTCTCATGCT ATGCCGAAAT GGAAAGTCTT CAAGAAAATT 120 GAAAAAGTCG GTCGCAACAT TCGAAACGGT ATTGTCAAGG CTGGACCAGC GATCGCGGTT 180 TTAGGCGAAG CCAAAGCGCT AGGATAAGAA TTC 213 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:20: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 68 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:20: Met Gly Phe Phe Leu Phe Ser Glu Met Pro Ser Phe Phe Leu Val Ser 1 5 10 15 Thr Leu Leu Leu Phe Leu He He Ser His Ser Ser Ala Ala Met Pro 20 25 30 Lys Tyr Lys Val Phe Lys Lys He Glu Lys Val Gly Arg Asn He Arg 35 40 45 Asn Gly He Val Lys Ala Gly Pro Ala He Ala Val Leu Gly Glu Ala 50 55 60 Lys Ala Leu Gly 65 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:21: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 42 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:21: GATCTATGCC GAAATGGAAA GTCTTCAAGA AAATTGAAAA AG 42 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:22: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 40 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:22: TCGGTCGCAA CATTCGAAAC GGTATTGTCA AGGCTGGACC 40 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:23: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 40 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:23: 38-N AGCGATCGCG GTTTTAGGCG AAGCCAAAGC GCTAGGATAA 40 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:24: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 52 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:24: AATGTTGCGA CCGACTTTTT CAATTTTCTT GAAGACTTTC CATTTCGGCA TA 52 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:25: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 41 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:25: AAAACCGCGA TCGCTGGTCC AGCCTTGACA ATACCGTTTC G 41 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:26: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:26: AATTCTTATC CTAGCGCTTT GGCTTCGCCT 30 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:27: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 723 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:27: GACGCGCACG GAGCCCTTAC GCTCAACTCC GATGGTACCT CTGGTGCTGT GGTTAAAGTA 60 CCCTTTGCTG GTAACGACAA GAATATAGTA AGCGCTATCG GTTCCGTAGA CTTAACTGAT 120 AGGCAGAAAC TAGGCGCTGC AACCGCTGGA GTGGCACTGG ATAATATAAA CGGTCACGGA 180 CTAAGTCTCA CGGATACACA CATCCCCGGG TTCGGAGACA AGATGACAGC AGCCGGCAAA 240 GTGAATGTCT TCCACAATGA TAACCACGAC ATCACAGCGA AGGCTTTCGC CACCAGAAAC 300 ATGCCGGATA TTGCTAATGT ACCTAATTTC AACACTGTCG GTGGCGGAAT AGACTATATG 360 TTCAAAGATA AGATTGGTGC ATCTGCGAGC GCCGCTCACA CGGACTTTAT CAATCGCAAC 420 GACTACTCTC TTGACGGGAA ACTGAACCTC TTCAAGACTC CTGATACCTC GATTGATTTC 480 AACGCCGGTT TCAAGAAGTT CGATACACCT TTCATGAAGT CCTCTTGGGA GCCTAACTTC 540 GGATTCTCAC TTTCTAAATA TTTCTGATTA GTATTTTAAT TTTAATTCTA TATATATAAA 600 TTTAGATGTA TATGTATATA TATATATTTT TTTTTTATTA ATATGATATC ACTAAATGTA 660 TTTACTCCTT CGATTATTAT TACTTTTTTT GTTTAAAGAA GTCCGCCTAA TAAAGATAAT 720 TTG 723 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:28: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 188 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: unknown (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:28: Asp Ala His Gly Ala Leu Thr Leu Asn Ser Asp Gly Thr Ser Gly Ala 1 5 10 15 Val Val Lys Val Pro Phe Ala Gly Asn Asp Lys Asn He Val Ser Ala 20 25 30 k He Gly Ser Val Asp Leu Thr Asp Arg Gin Lys Leu Gly Ala Ala Thr 35 40 45 Ala Gly Val Ala Leu Asp Asn He Asn Gly His Gly Leu Ser Leu Thr 50 55 60 Asp Thr His He Pro Gly Phe Gly Asp Lys Met Thr Ala Ala Gly Lys 65 70 75 80 Val Asn Val Phe His Asn Asp Asn His Asp He Thr Ala Lys Ala Phe 85 90 95 Ala Thr Arg Asn Met Pro Asp He Ala Asn Val Pro Asn Phe Asn Thr 100 105 110 Val Gly Gly Gly He Asp Tyr Met Phe Lys Asp Lys He Gly Ala Ser 115 120 125 Ala Ser Ala Ala His Thr Asp Phe He Asn Arg Asn Asp Tyr Ser Leu 130 135 140 Asp Gly Lys Leu Asn Leu Phe Lys Thr Pro Asp Thr Ser He Asp Phe 145 150 155 160 Asn Ala Gly Phe Lys Lys Phe Asp Thr Pro Phe Met Lys Ser Ser Trp 165 170 175 Glu Pro Asn Phe Gly Phe Ser Leu Ser Lys Tyr Phe 180 185

Claims: 39 - WHAT IS CLAIMED: 1. A method of conferring resistance against fire blight to pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars comprising: transforming pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars with a gene which encodes for a lytic protein. 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said transforming comprises: contacting tissue of pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars with an inoculum of a bacterium of the genus Agrobacterium, wherein the bacterium is transformed with a vector comprising the gene which encodes for a lytic protein. 3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the bacterium of the genus Agrobacterium is Agrobacterium tumefaciens. 4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the Agrobacterium tumefaciens is strain LBA4404. 5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the tissue is selected from the group consisting of leaf tissue, root tissue, meristems, and protoplasts. 6. A method according to claim 1, wherein said transforming comprises: propelling particles at cell tissue of pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivars under conditions effective for the particles to penetrate into the cell interior and introducing a vector comprising the gene which encodes for a lytic protein into the cell interior. - 40 - 7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the vector is associated with the particles, whereby the vector is carried into the cell interior together with the particles. 8. A method according to claim 6, wherein the vector surrounds the cell and is drawn into the cell interior by the particles' wake. 9. A method according to claim 1 further comprising: regenerating the cultivars transformed with the gene % which encodes for a lytic protein to form a transgenic pomaceous fruit tree. 10. A method according to claim 1, wherein the lytic protein is selected from the group consisting of lysozyme, cecropins, attacins, and homologs thereof. 11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the lytic protein is Attacin E. 12. A method according to claim 1, wherein the apple rootstock is selected from the group consisting of M.7, M.9, M.26, M.27, MM.106, MM.Ill, Merton 792, Maruba Kaido, Budagovsky 9, Mark, Ottawa 3, and seedling. 13. A method according to claim 12, wherein the rootstock is M.26. 14. A method according to claim 2, wherein the vector is selected from the group consisting of pLDBlO, pLDB15, pBPRSl, pBCCSl, pBPRB37, and pBCCB37. 15. A method according to claim 2, wherein the bacterium of the genus Agrobacterium is Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 and the rootstock is M.26. - 41 - 16. A method according to claim 1, wherein the pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivar is an apple scion or rootstock cultivar. 17. A method according to claim 1, wherein the pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivar is a pear scion or rootstock cultivar. 18. A transgenic pomaceous fruit scion or rootstock cultivar transformed with a gene which encodes for a lytic protein that imparts fire blight resistance to the cultivar. 19. A transgenic cultivar according to claim 18, wherein the lytic protein is selected from the group consisting of lysozyme, cecropins, attacins, and homologs thereof. 20. A transgenic cultivar according to claim 19, wherein the lytic protein is Attacin E. 21. A transgenic cultivar according to claim 18, wherein the apple rootstock is selected from the group consisting of M.7, M.9, M.26, M.27, MM.106, MM.Ill, Merton 793, Maruba Kaido, Budagovsky 9, Mark, Ottawa 3, and seedling. 22. A transgenic cultivar according to claim 21, wherein the rootstock is M.26. 23. A transgenic cultivar according to claim 18, wherein the pomaceous fruit is an apple. 24 . A transgenic cultivar according to claim 18 , wherein the pomaceous fruit is a pear. - 42 - 25. A transgenic pomaceous fruit tree transformed with a gene which encodes for a lytic protein that imparts fire blight resistance to the tree. 26. A transgenic tree according to claim 25, wherein the lytic protein is selected from the group consisting of lysozyme, cecropins, attacins, and homologs thereof. 27. A transgenic tree according to claim 26, wherein the lytic protein is Attacin E. 28. A transgenic tree according to claim 25, wherein the pomaceous fruit is an apple. 29. A transgenic tree according to claim 25, wherein the pomaceous fruit is a pear.

Inventors: ALDWINCKLE HERBERT S, NORELLI JOHN L, ALDWINCKLE, HERBERT, S., NORELLI, JOHN, L.
Applicants: CORNELL RES FOUNDATION INC, CORNELL RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC.
Application year: 1993
Main classification: A01H1
IPC codes: A01H1, A01H5, C07K14, C12N5, C12N9, C12N15