A THICKENING DISPERSION AND ITS UTILIZATION

Abstract: The invention relates to a polymer dispersion, by means of which the rheological properties and structure of various liquid and flowing mixtures may be adjusted. The dispersion is prepared by radical polymerizing, into a water soluble chain backbone polymer or into such a polymer brought water soluble, in a water solution at least one alpha -, beta -unsaturated carboxyl acid containing 3-8 carbons as well as at least one to a limited amount unsaturated monomer. The chain backbone polymer is preferably a starch derivative.

Description: A thickening dispersion and its utilization The present invention relates to a polymer dispersion, by means of which the rheological properties and structure of various liquid and flowing mixtures may be adjusted. Especially, the inventive dispersion is applicable to be used for improving the rheology and water retention of coating colours used in the preparation of coated paper grades, but the product is as well applicable to other analog objects, such as to the adjustment of the flowing properties of paints and colours. The most important property of a good colour used in the coating of paper is the correct rheology. At low shearing speeds, the colour is to have a sufficiently high vis¬ cosity, so that the coating layer is not excessively ab¬ sorbed into the paper and thus cause a spot-like coating result. At high shearing forces prevailing e.g. in con¬ nection with the coating occurrence below, the blade ap- plying the coating colour onto the paper surface, the viscosity is to be low to make the coating occurring at high speeds initially possible. In other words, the col¬ ours are to be "shearing thinning" by nature. Another central property required by the coating colours - es- pecially in connection with roll application - is water retention. If this property is omitted, the solids con¬ tent of the colour in the coating process does not remain constant and the water retention into the base paper causes a spot-like coating result. In addition, the effective agents travelled along with the aqueous phase, such as optic brighteners, travel into the base paper or back to the colour circulation, due to which the coating result does not remain constant and the composition of the coating colour may change in the colour circulation. For the adjustment of the colour rheology and water re¬ tention is generally used cellulose derivatives, such as carboxy methyl cellusose and hydroxy ethyl cellulose. By means of these, a relatively good result is generally achieved. A problem in connection therewith is a rela¬ tively complex prepation process and because of that a high price, and on the other hand the problems related to the treatment thereto. These chemicals are in fact de¬ livered to the users as solid powders, whose solubility in water is very limited and slow. In addition to a cum¬ bersome treatment, the water brought along with the dis¬ solved cellulose derivative limits the selection of the colour components, when it is preferable to reach high- solids-content coating colours. There are on the market also fully synthetic thickeners to be delivered in liquid form, which are generally pre- pared by polymerizing unsaturated, usually acrylate mono¬ mers into a polymer dispersion. However, their thickening properties do not correspond to cellulose derivatives, e.g. relative to the water retention. Also, the carrying capacity of optic brighteners is in this connection also lower. The preparation of acrylate dispersions of this type has been described as early as in 1958 in a patent specification US 2 819 189 (Suen et al., American Cyan- amide Company), in which patent a reference is also made to a possibility of using the product as a thickener. The US patent 4423 118 from the year 1983 (Corbett, Asch- wanden, The Dow* Chemical Company) describes the prepara¬ tion and usage of a product polymerized from three acryl¬ ate monomers of a different type. The dispersion products prepared according to the patent are already at a fairly low solids content very viscous and thereby difficult to treat. The example 2 of said patent publication illu¬ strates the limitations related to the usage of certain acrylic polymer dispersion compositions. The inventive polymer dispersion offers a solution to the drawbacks mentioned above. It has now surprisingly been observed that by polymerizing suitable monomers into a polymer chain backbone, especially into a suitably treat¬ ed starch, it is possible to achieve a low-viscosity dis¬ persion product, whose thickening properties both for the rheology and the water retention, are ideal already at very low dosing levels. The advantages related to the usage of the dispersion prepared according to the inven¬ tion thereby include easy utilization, good technical applicability, and due to small dosing quantities re¬ quired, a better economicality than that prevailed earli- er. A central preparation technique of the inventive polymer dispersion is based on a grafting reaction, wherein into a chain backbone containing functional groups suitable from the point of view of the reaction, initialized by a radical reaction, are joined polymerizing monomers/mono¬ mer mixtures providing suitable properties. The term "dispersion" is to be understood in this connection wide¬ ly, since at certain monomer/monomer chain backbone poly- mer ratios, the products are nearly totally or totally in the form of a solution. In practise, groups achieving the radical initiation necessary from the point of view of the reaction, hydrox- yl and amino groups are concerned. In this way, natural chain backbone materials are concerned, especially natu¬ ral carbohydrates (e.g. starch, cellulose, alginates, etc. ) proteins (e.g gelatin, collagen, gluten, casein, soybean protein, etc.), but also synthetic molecules, such as polyvinyl alcohol, polyaimides and polyacrylic amide are technically possible polymeric chain backbone molecules. In addition to the functionality possibilitating the rad- ical initiation, another property required of the chain backbone polymer is a correct molecular size and water solubility. Because of this, most compounds mentioned above are not as such suitable for chain backbone ma¬ terials of grafting, but they have to be modified by splitting up or hydrolytically for reaching the correct state. As especially advantageous chain backbone materials of grafting are considered to be starches of a different origin, since their availabity is good, they are very economical, their functionability in grafting reactions is excellent, as is well known, and their modification to a suitable solubility/molecular level is well controlled. Split-up starch modifications directly suitable for the preration of the inventive dispersion are commercially available, but the splitting up may be preferably per- formed also in situ as the first step of the preparation process by using an acidic or enzymatic hydrolysis or different oxidation methods. An especially preferable way of performing the necessary splitting-up reaction is thus an oxidation catalyzed by hydrogen peroxide, since the catalyst system used later also catalyzes the grafting reaction, and no extra components travel into the reac¬ tion mixture, which would require cleaning operations. As is well known, the molecular size of polymers corre- lates with the viscosity of the polymer solution. In this way, the splitting-up degree suitable for the preparation of the dispersion may be controlled by means of viscosity measurements. It has been established that a practical viscosity level of the split-up starch solution, as measured from a 10%-solution at a temperature of 25°C by means of a Brookfield RVTDV II viscosity meter, by means of a measuring head 2 and at a rate of 100 rpm immediate¬ ly after the cooling of the starch solution is in the range of 10τ200 mPas. When using starch polymer providing a higher viscosity level, the grafting results in a dis¬ persion product, whose viscosity is within an applicable range only at very dilute concentrations. By using hydrogen peroxide, and a potate starch as raw material, a usable oxidation level is reached by a 35% hydrogen peroxide when a dosing of 1-10% as calculated on the amount of the dry starch is used. The splitting-up is preferably performed at a temperature of 25-50°C in a starch slurry, whose starch content is ca. 10-45%. A suf¬ ficient reaction time is thus ca. 2 hours. The oxidied starch to be obtained from the splitting-up process is in an insoluble granular form. For the further process, this product is to be brought water soluble by gelatinizing the product. This occurs by heating the slurry to a suf¬ ficiently high temperature. In practise, especially for the preparation of the inventive product, it is purpose¬ ful to perform the heating at 100°C for at least 10-15 min for dissolving all the granules. It is generally most preferable to perform the gelatinization immediately in connection with the splitting-up process, but in several cases it is possible also after the radical polymeriza¬ tion. An essential part of the preparation of the inventive dispersion is the grafting of monomers into the polymer chain backbone described above. Critical quantities for achieving an optimal functionability include the monomer composition, the amount of monomers in relation to the chain backbone material, the catalyst system achieving the radical initiation as well the reaction temperature. Essential thickening properties are determined on the basis of the monomer composition used. It has been ob¬ served that as grafting monomers are to be used on one hand α-, β-ethylenically unsaturated carboxyl acids (A) and on the other hand more hydrophobic monomers, whose solubility in water is limited (B). As for the solubil- ity, as the base value may be given a value such that the solubility should be below 20 g of the monomer in 100 g of the water solution. As examples of suitable unsaturat- ed carboxyl acids are all unsaturated acids containg ca. 3-8 carbon atoms, but it is especially prerable to use an acrylic acid or a methacrylic acid. Suitable monomers having a limited solubility are e.g. acrylonitrile, vinyl asetate, methyl metacrylate, as well as ethyl and methyl acrylates. An especially suitable material for the prep¬ aration of the inventive dispersion is acrylonitrile. It is to be noted that varying amounts of other polymerizing monomers may also be used, such as styrene, acrylic amide, butyl acrylate, etc., but these do not provide a significant improvement in the thickener properties and when used in too large an amount, they are detrimental. The mutual ratio of the monomers A and B is important both with respect to the external properties and to the thickening properties of the product. It has been ob¬ served that the molar ratio A/B may vary about in the limits 0.2-4.0 also depending on the chain back¬ bone/monomer quantity ratio used. At too low A/B ratios, the stability of the dispersion is too weak, but on the other hand too high a ratio results in a high viscosity of the product and also in a disadvantageous water reten¬ tion when used in coating colours. The A/B ratio to be used preferably varies within the limits 0.5-3 and most prerably within the limits 0.5-1.5. The amount of the chain backbone material has an effect both on the external and functional properties of the product. When split-up starch is used as the chain back- bone material, its amount may vary upwards from 1%. How¬ ever, at low starch quantities, the grafting reaction becomes more difficult and at the same time, especially if the the A/B ratio is low, the stability of the product suffers. (A limiting case of an emulsion polymerization is concerned, wherein emulgators should be used for fa¬ cilitating the provision of the product. ) A preferable quantity of starch is within a range of 10-70% of the total solid matter. It has been observed that an increase in the relative quantity of starch improves the water retention properties of the thickened product, but it weakens the viscosity stability of the dispersion itself, and after a certain optimal range also the ability of increasing the viscosity decreases. From the point of view of totality, the most preferable starch content is thus mostly within the range of 20-50% from the solid matter. The monomers are joined to the chain backbone polymer by means of a radical polymerization reaction. In the case of the inventive type, the reaction is often termed as grafting. The reaction may be achieved by means of rad- ical initiators known as such, which may be chemical (e.g. ammonium and potassium persulfhates, hydrogen per¬ oxide, organic peroxides) or physical, such as by means of radiation by electron-, gamma- or UV-radiation. The reaction conditions as well as the functional properties of the product to be obtained naturally vary according to the initiation system to be used. For example, the graft¬ ing initiated by the radiation may be performed already at room temperature. Instead, the reaction as catalyzed by the peroxides and persulphates for reaching in prac- tise a sufficient speed requires an elevated temperature of more than 40°C, but preferably more than 60°C. It has also been observed that the thickening effect of the pro¬ duct often significantly improves, when the temperature in the initial step of the reaction is first lower, e.g. within the range of 60-70 C C, and the temperature is fi¬ nally increased to a higher level (> 80°C) e.g. for two hours. When catalyzed by persulphates, the reaction may be per- formed in a normal atmosphere, whereas when catalyzed by hydrogen peroxide, the reaction requires a non-oxidizing atmosphere. Both from the point of view of the thickening ability and the external properties (low dispersion vis¬ cosity) of the product, an especially preferable initi¬ ation catalysis is obtained by means of hydrogen peroxide either alone or especially combined as an oxidation-re- duction pair together with an organic compound having a multi-valued metal salt or an oxidation-reduction abil¬ ity. Said suitable compounds to be used together with hydrogen peroxide include e.g. copper salts, iron salts (Fenton's reagent), ascorbic acid, hydroquinone, etc. The dispersion product based on the inventive split-up starch may be manufactured up to about an 50% solids con¬ tent, mainly depending on splitting-up degree and the monomer ratios of the starch. With respect to the thickener effect and viscosity stability of the disper¬ sion, an optimal solids content is ca. 15-30% at a mono¬ mer ratio A/B of ca. 0.5-1.5. In this case, it is poss¬ ible to obtain as a product a very easily treatable, low- viscosity (40-100 mPas) and stable dispersion, which pro- vides for the colour in a pigment coating application ideal viscosity properties within a very extensive shear¬ ing speed range as well as an excellent water retention. The pH-value of the dispersion prepared as described above is within the range of 1.8-5, the more acidic end of whose range describes a situation, in which the mono¬ mer ratio A/B is high and/or.a catalyst system decreasing the pH-value as an initiator. The thickening effect of the product will be evident in an environment, whose pH- value is higher than the pH-value of the product itself. Because of this, it is apparent that the thickening ef¬ fect is on one hand based on interactions, which prevail between ionized carboxyl groups and the more hydrophofic groups of the polymer, as well as on the adsorption be- tween these groups and the particles (e.g. pigments) existing in the medium to be thickened. The following examples illustrate in detail the prepara¬ tion of the inventive thickening dispersion and its usage as a thickener of a pigment colour. Example 1 93.80 g of hypochlorite oxidized potate starch Raisamyl 302E, whose viscosity as a 10% water solution at 25°C is 22 mPas, was elutriated into 900 g of water. The starch was gelatinized by admixing this slurry at an elevated temperature of 100°C for 20 min, whereafter the tempera¬ ture was decreased to 70°C. Into the solution was added 0.1 g of copper sulphate and a nitrogen elutriation was arranged into the reaction vessel for eliminating the oxygen. It was then simultaneously started to drop into the reaction mixture from dropping funnels a 35-% hydro¬ gen peroxide (the total amount 5.2 g diluted into 60 ml of water) as well as a mixture, which contained 142 g of acrylic acid and 104 g of acrylonitrile (molar ratio 1.0). The monomer mixture was added totally within 1.5 hours and the catalyst within 3 hours. The reaction was allowed to continue for still 20 hours. As a product was obtained a white-like dispersion, whose solids content was 25.8%, pH-value 3.3, viscosity 54 mPas (25°C) and the average particle size 490 nm. The product did not contain any precipitate.. According to a gas chromatography analy¬ sis, the content of unreacted acrylonitrile contained by the product was 60 ppm and the amount of free acrylic acid was 0.05%. Example 2 The effect of the quantity ratios, the catalyst selection as well as the gelatinizing procedure of the starch de- rivative used as. the chain backbody polymer, on the qual¬ ity of the final product was clarified using the same reagents as in Example 1. The abbreviations used: Catalyst: APS - ammonium persulphate, PER=H 2 0 2 -CuS0 4 . TMO: GEL = the starch is gelatinized before the radical reaction, GRA - the starch is gelatinized after the rad- ical reaction. AsN: molar ratio: acrylic acid/acrylonitrile. SsSY: molar ratio: starch/synthetic monomer %ST (starch), %AC (acrylic acid), %ΝIT (acrylonitrile): composition by percent. Dry matter content (d.m.c): the solids content-% of the product. viscosity (vise ): the Brookfield viscosity of the pro¬ duct mPas at 25°C. The results are shown in the enclosed Table 1. Table 1 NO RES Sfll THO BsN SSSY %ST -tflC -SHIT d .m. c. vise. HOTS 1 *P19065 (l/0.3) precipitates totally 2 *P19065 (8/0.3) precipitates * 3 *Pl9065 (21/0.3) 2200 viscous, no precipitate ♦ P19065(1/1.0) APS GEL 1.0 0.003 0.8 57.1 42.1 25.0 precipitate to some extent *P19065(4/1.0) APS GEL 1.0 0.015 3.8 55.4 40.8 25.2 27 precipitate to a very limited extent *P19065(7/1.0) APS GEL 1.0 0.031 7.4 53.3 39.3 26.6 30 no precipitate *P19065(14/1.0) APS GEL 1.0 0.062 13.8 49.7 36.6 25.8 128 *P19065(25/1.0) APS GEL ' 1.0 0.123 24.2 43.6 32.1 26.1 1100 viscous *P19065(1/1.4) GEL 1.4 0.002 0.6 65.1 34.2 26.3 100000 precipitate separates, pH changed --> solids content viscosity 10 *P19065(5/1.4) APS 0.021 5.0 62. 32.7 25.4 48 water phase separated, pH 1.93 11 *P19065(10/1.4) APS 0.042 9.5 59. 31.2 26.4 99 12 *P19065(14/1.4) APS 0.062 13.6 56. 29.8 27.3 124 13 *P19065(23/1.4) APS 0.115 22.6 50. 26.7 26.4 12000 14 *P19065(37/1.4) APS 0.232 36.9 41. 21.7 28.2 40000 15 *P19065(1/1.9) APS GEL 1.9 002 0.5 71.7 7.8 0.0 complete phase separation 16 *P19065(5/1.9) APS GEL 1.9 021 5.0 68.5 26.5 26.2 93 17 *P19065(10/1.9) APS GEL 1.9 042 9.5 65.2 25.3 25.9 328 18 *P19065{19/1.9) APS GEL 1.9 096 19.2 58.3 22.6 25.4 510 no precipitate, pH 1.80 19 *P19065(32/1.9) APS GEL 1.9 192 32.2 48.9 18.9 26.0 320 002 0.6 77.5 21.9 0 complete phase separation 017 4.0 74.8 21.2 26 5500 partial phase separartion, improved with turrax 7.7 72. 20.4 25. 85 ,15.8 65. 18.6 27. 6000 27.3 56. 16.0 26. 1800 25 *P19065(l/3.3) APS GEL 0.003 0.7 81.1 18.2 26.2 3500 viscous, no precipitate 26 *P19065(3/3.3) APS GEL 0.014 3.3 79.0 17.6 27.3 100000 separates, pH changed —> solids content viscosity 27 *Pl9065(8/3.3) APS GEL 0.036 7.9 75.3 16.8 27.2 viscosity varies within 3000-15000 cp 28 *P19065(15/3.3) APS GEL 0.072 14.7 69.8 15.6 25.3 840 29 *P19065(26/3.3) APS GEL 0.144 25.6 60.8 13.6 26.1 66000 30 *P19065(l/0.3) PER GEL 0.3 0.003 0.9 30.9 68.2 0.0 - complete phase separation, not analyzed 31 *P19065(8/0.3) PER GEL 0.3 0.031 8.0 28.7 63.3 0.0 - completely precipitated, does not dissolve in lye 32 *P19O65(21/0.3) PER GEL 0.3 0.093 20.6 24.7 54.6 22.8 0 ca. 15* of wet precipitate 33 *P19065(30/0.3) PER GEL 0.3 0.153 30.0 21.8 48.2 0.0 0 thickened, when monomers had been fed 34 *P19065(40/0.3) PER GEL 0.3 0.238 40.0 18.7 41.3 26.5 25000 colour: light brown/no precipitate 35 *P19065(50/0.3) PER GEL 0.3 0.356 50.0 15.6 34.4 25.7 100000 colour: violet/no precipitate 36 *P19065(1/1.0) PER GEL 1.0 0.003 0.8 57,1 42.1 27,1 16 precipitates, initially thickening when neutralized 37 *Pl9065 (4/1.0) PER GEL 1.0 0.015 3.8 55. 40.8 23.8 24 38 *P19065 (7/1.0) PER GEL 1.0 0.031 7.4 53. 39.3 22.7 33 39 *P19065 (14/1.0) PER GEL 1.0 0.062 13.8 49. 36.6 24,1 60 40 •P19065 (24/1.0) PER GEL 1.0 0.123 24,2 43. 32.1 23.8 133 rotated over a weekend at 25"c 41 •P19065 (41/1.0) PER GEL 1.0 0.263 40.5 34, 25.2 28.2 1280 retrogrades 42 *P19065 (50/1.0) PER GEL 1.0 0.386 50.0 28.8 21.2 26.2 800 retrogrades 43 *P19065(1/1.4) PER GEL 1.4 0.002 0.6 65.1 34.2 31.6 7730 separated, pH was adjusted to σa. 5 —> vise, solids content 44 *P19065(5/1.4) PER GEL 1.4 0.021 5.0 62.3 32,7 26.1 35400 separates when still, pH was adjusted to ca. 5, v se, solids content 45 *P19065(10/1.4) PER GEL 1,4 0.042 9.5 59.3 31.2 17.2 30 46 *P19065(14/1.4) PER GEL 1.4 0.062 13.6 56.6 29.8 26.0 58 47 * *P19065(23/1.4) PER GEL 1.4 0,115 22.6 50.7 26.7 25.9 120 48 *P19065(37/1.4) PER GEL 1.4 0.232 36.9 41.3 21.7 25,8 455 49 *P19065(1/1.9) PER GEL 1.9 0.002 0.5 71.7 27.8 26.1 2340 water separates, pH was adjusted to ca. 3.5 --> measured viscosity 50 *P19065(5/1.9) PER GEL 1.9 0.021 5.0 68.5 26. 26.8 49600 water separates, treated with a 50% NaOH 51 *P19065(10/1.9) PER GEL 1.9 0.042 9.5 65.2 25. 23.9 7,8 separates into layers 52 * »P19065(19/1.9) PER GEL 1.9 0.096 19.2 58,3 22. 25.7 1060 53 *P19065(32/1.9) PER GEL 1.9 0.192 32.2 48.9 18. 28.1 water separates, solid portion plastic-like 54 *P19065(l/2.6) PER GEL 2.6 0.002 0.6 77.5 21.9 27.4 137 water separates, pH was adjusted to 3.5 —> measured viscosity 55 *P19065(4/2.6) PER GEL 2,6 0.017 4.0 74.8 21.2 26.2 30000 thick, sticky 56 *P19065(8/2.6) PER GEL 2.6 0.034 7.7 72.0 20.4 25.6 875 57 ι»P19065(16/2.6) PER GEL 2.6 0.077 15.8 65.6 18.6 26.6 803 58 *P19065(27/2.6) PER GEL 2.6 0.155 27.3 56.7 16,0 25.6 1870 59 *P19065(l/3.3) PER GEL 3.3 0.003 0.7 81.1 18.2 27.0 600 60 *P19065(3/3.3) PER GEL 3,3 0.014 3,3 79,0 17.6 25.3 232 61 *P19065(8/3.3) PER GEL 3.3 0.036 7.9 75.3 16.8 25.8 350 62 *P19065(15/3.3) PER GEL 3.3 0.072 14.7 69.8 15.6 25.6 880 63 *P19065(26/3.3) PER GEL 3.3 0.144 25.6 60.8 13,6 25.2 1020 64 *P19065(50/0.3) PER GRλ 0.3 0.357 50.0 15.6 34.4 35.0 granules do not cook 65 *P19065(5O/0.7) PER GRA 0.7 0.376 50.0 24,4 25.6 35.0 granules do not cook 66 *P19065(5O/1.0) PER GRA 1.0 0.386 50.0 28.8 21,2 35.0 difficult cooking 67 *P19065(66/1.0) PER GRA 1.0 0.748 66,0 19.6 14.4 35.0 cook Example 3 In this example, as a chain backbone polymer was used a native potato starch, which was split up by oxidizing it by hydrogen peroxide in the first step of the reaction. 75.12 g of native potato starch was elutriated in water and into this was added 4.2 g of a 35% hydrogen peroxide. The mixture was allowed to mix at a temperature of 40°C for 2 hours, whereafter the temperature was increased to 97-100°C for gelatinizing the product for 2 hours. The reaction was then continued according to Example 1 at the reagent ratios of the example. As a product was obtained a white dispersion, whose solids content was 23.8%, vis¬ cosity 64.4 mPas and average particle size 870 nm. The pH-value of the product was 3.1 and the acrylonitrile residue was 90 ppm and the acrylic acid residue 0.1%. Example 4 A synthesis according to Example 1 was performed, in which 170 g of metacrylic acid (A/B molar ratio 1.0) was used in place of acrylic acid. As a product was obtained a white low-viscosity dispersion, whose acrylonitrile residue was 100 ppm. Example 5 A synthesis according to Example 1 was performed, in which 170 g of metacrylic acid and 168 g of vinyl acetate (A/B molar ratio = 1) were used in place of acrylic acid. The total amount of water used for elutriating the starch and for diluting the peroxide was 1475 g. As a product was obtained a white low-viscosity dispersion. Example 6 A synthesis according to Example 1 was performed, in which the acrylic acid was replaced with 196 g of ethyl acrylate (A/B = 1) and the total amount of water was 1730 g. As a reaction product was obtained a white dispersion, whose viscosity was 350 mPas. Example 7 In this example, the functionalibity of a dispersion pre¬ pared according to the invention is compared as a coat- ing-colour thickener with a commonly used carboxy methyl cellulose thickener, CMC Finnfix-10. The results listed in the following table are based on measurements, which have been performed from the following, by its composi¬ tion typical LWC offset coating colour: Solids fractions The reference is a colour, which contains no thickener. In addition, into the colour has been added 0.25-1.0 solids fractions of the thickener per 100 pigment frac¬ tions, and the Brookfield viscosity, water retention (Wat.r. ) as well Haake viscosity have been measured at a shearing speed 10000 1/s (mPas). In the measurement has been used a water retention meter AAGWR developed by Abo Akademi, which meter measures the drainage of water from the colour, when it is pressed at a certain pressure through a dense filter. The unit is g/m 2 . The water re- tention of the colour is thus the higher, the lower the read-out is. TABLE 2 Sample REF FF-10 FF-10 FF-10 FF-10 25/1.0 25/1.0 25/1.0 25/1.0 Fract. 0.0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 Vise. 156.0 546.0 1040.0 1580.0 2200.0 1070.0 1560.0 2330.0 2680.0 Wat.r. 114.4 95.8 79.6 66.0 56.1 71.1 57.8 38.8 33.1 Haake 80.0 120.0 130.0 185.0 205.0 133.0 183.0 218.0 225.0 As it may be observed from the results of the table, the dispersion prepared according to Example 1 clearly causes a higher increase in the Brookfield viscoty level than carboxy methyl cellulose. At a high shearing speed, the viscosity level drops to a level corresponding to that of carboxy methyl cellulose. The inventive dispension pro¬ vides for the colour a better water retention than that of carboxy methyl cellulose.

Claims: Claims 1. A thickening dispersion, characterized in that it is prepared by radical polymerizing into a water soluble chain backbone polymer or into such a polymer brought water soluble in a water solution at least one α-, β-un¬ saturated carboxyl acid containing 3-8 carbons as well as at least one to a limited amount water soluble unsaturat¬ ed monomer, whereby it in its flowing form, when added to an environment, causes an increase in the viscosity of this environment, after the pH-value has exceeded the pH- value of the dispersion. 2. A dispersion according to Claim 1, characterized in that the water soluble chain backbone polymer is a starch derivative, which has been prepared by splitting up starch or other starch modifications to a viscosity„level of 10-200 mPas, as measured at 25°C from a 10% solution made water soluble by heating. 3. A dispersion according to Claim 1, characterized in that the water soluble chain backbone polymer has been prepared from a native starch or from another long-mol¬ ecular starch derivative by splitting it up as the first step of the preparation process in the reaction mixture to a viscosity .level 10-200 mPas, as measured at 25°C from a 10% solution made water soluble by heating. 4. A dispersion according to Claim 3, characterized in that the splitting up is performed by using hydrogen per¬ oxide as an oxidation chemical causing the splitting up. 5. A dispersion according to Claims 2-4, characterized in that the starch derivative is caused to become water sol- uble by heating its water suspension at a temperature exceeding 70 C C before the radical polymerization. 6. A dispersion according to Claim 1, characterized in that the chain backbone polymer is a starch or a starch derivative, which has been split up and caused to become water soluble by heating the water suspension at a tem- perature exceeding 70°C after the radical polymerization. 7. A dispersion according to Claim 1, characterized in that the molar ratio of unsaturated carboxyl acids into a to a limited extent water soluble monomer is within a range of 0.2-4. 8. A dispersion according to Claim 1, characterized in that the α-, β-unsaturated acid is an acrylic acid, a methacrylic acid or a mixture thereof. 9. A dispersion according to Claim 1, characterized in that the to a limited extent water soluble monomer is acrylonitrile, vinyl acetate, methyl methacrylate, ethyl or methyl acrylate or a mixture thereof. 10. A dispersion according to Claim 1, characterized in that the radical polymerization has been performed in a water solution at a temperature of 0-120°C by using any known radical initiator as a catalyst initiating the re- action. 11. A dispersion according to Claim 10, characterized in that the radical initiator is an oxidation-reduction sys¬ tem, in which the oxidant is hydrogen peroxide and the reducing agent is a multi-valued metal salt or a reduct- ible organic compound and the radical polymerization is performed in a nitrogen atmosphere. 12. A dispersion according to any of the Claims 1-11, characterized in that its pH-value is below 5. 13. A dispersion according to any of the Claims 1-12, characterized in that the solids content of the disper¬ sion is within a range of 10-50% by weight. 14. A dispersion according to any of the Claims 1-13, characterized in that the quantity of the chain backbody polymer is higher than 1% by weight when calculated from the total solids content of the dispersion. 15. A method for controlling the rheology of paper coat- ing colours containing mineral pigments, characterized in that 0.1-2 solids fractions are mixed into the colour per 100 weight fractions of the mineral pigment for a disper¬ sion according to any of the Claims 1-14, and when so needed, the pH-value is then adjusted to a purposeful value.

Inventors: ANTTILA MIKA, HAMUNEN ANTTI, NURMI KARI, ANTTILA, MIKA, HAMUNEN, ANTTI, NURMI, KARI
Applicants: ANTTILA MIKA, HAMUNEN ANTTI, NURMI KARI, RAISION TEHTAAT OY AB
Application year: 1993
Main classification: C08F251
IPC codes: C08F251, D21H19