METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLED INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICATION

Abstract: A method and a device for giving patients individualised, situation-dependent medication advice are disclosed. Preferably, the invention is implemented in portable computers. The method is founded on knowledge-based computer technology and comprises a reminder function (1), a recording and storage function (2, 3), as well as a function for inductive data analysis (4) and rule generation. When the knowledge-based system (6) finds that a medicine should be taken, the computer emits a signal providing information on the type of medicine and the dose. The patient records the intake of medicine as well as his current state of health. This information is stored in a database together with the point of time. Inductive data analysis is used to spot the relationship between various events and symptoms as well as establish medication rules. These rules are refined upon as new information is recorded in the database, and are automatically adapted to changes in the patient's state of health.

Description: Method and apparatus for controlled individualized medication. This invention relates to a method for controlled individualised medication. Many chronic diseases in man require the administra¬ tion of various substances in order to counteract the dis ease and/or to keep down its symptoms. Medication often includes several different pharmaceutical preparations, each having its specific properties, duration of action, and so forth. Dosage and time intervals between admini¬ strations depend on the status of the disease, patient- specific factors, such as inheritance, age, weight, gene¬ ral state of health as well as diet and physical activi¬ ties. As a result, medication is a fairly complicated task to perform. In practice, this will manifest itself as variations in the patient's state of health. In the case of some diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, the symptoms may in a single day vary from making the patient incapacitated for work (rigidity, tremor, etc.) to leavin the patient almost untroubled. There are several different methods used for provid¬ ing recommendations as to the dosage and the time inter¬ vals between administrations. These recommendations are often founded on the adjustment of an initial concept based on pharmacokinetic information on the various pre¬ parations. The adjustments are made on the basis of recor dations of the patient's condition on various occasions. This information is interpreted by specialists, and used for adjusting the dosage and the time intervals. However, the methods currently used do not yield desirable results, the reason being that the pharmacokine tic effects of the preparations are not absolutely clear. The way the preparations move through the body is affecte by interactions with other preparations, enzymes and so forth, during the absorption and the distribution phase as well as during the metabolism and the secretion phase. Thus, the actual concentration of a preparation in the biophase, the duration of action and the effect cannot be predicted statistically using monotonic models. Another reason is that the evaluation of the patient's data is a complex operation since it involves many dependent vari- ables and since it further is difficult to lay down analy¬ tical models. It is likely that the state of health of certain groups of patients can be drastically improved by optimum, individualised and situation-dependent medication. This would result in enhanced quality of life, as well as fewe sickness pensioners. GB 2,218,831 teaches an apparatus for helping people suffering from chronic diseases, such as diabetes, to determine medication doses and keep a suitable diet, thereby to improve their state of health. This apparatus has a key pad for entering data on the blood glucose levels as well as the physical activity of the patient, a memory where e.g. data on the prescribed dosage are stored, a program for computing suitable doses of insulin on the basis of inputted data as well as data stored in the memory, and a display for showing the doses of insuli computed. Similar apparatus are described in US Patent 5,019,974 and EP Patent Application 0 128 054. These prior-art apparatus are all based on there being a known relationship between a condition of the patient, such as the blood glucose level, and the well- being of the patient, and on the medication having a know effect on the patient. Thus, one may establish fixed medi- cation rules valid for comparatively long periods of time. However, in the case of other chronical diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, epilepsy and abnormal blood pressures, there does not exist any single actual value or condition of the patient that can be measured and corre- lated with the well-being of the patient. For these dis¬ eases, medication generally includes several medicines, whose precise interactions and effects on the patient are not fully known. In addition, the health condition of the patient is affected by a plurality of external factors. Thus, it is impossible to establish fixed medication rules valid for long periods of time, and the prior-art appara- tus therefore cannot be used for controlled individualised medication in the treatment of more complicated diseases. The object of the present invention is to provide a method and a device for controlled, individualised medi¬ cation in the treatment of complicated diseases whose mechanisms are not fully known, thereby to improve the patient's state of health. This object is attained by a method and a device hav¬ ing the distinctive features recited in appended claims 1 and 9, respectively. Other features of the invention are stated in the appended subclaims. The invention has the great advantage of automatical¬ ly drawing conclusions from the inputted data as to what activities, what external factors and what medication will result in a satisfactory state of health for the patient. On the basis of these conclusions, rules are established regarding when and in what doses the different medicines are to be taken. The thus-established rules are not fixed, but are continuously refined upon with the aid of data recorded by the patient. Thus, the invention gradually "learns" what is needed for the well-being of the patient. Further, the rules are automatically adapted to changes in the patient without the device having to be reprogrammed. The invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawing, which schema- tically illustrates the structure of a device in accor¬ dance with the invention. The aim of the invention is to give the patients con¬ trolled, individualised and situation-dependent medication advice, thereby to enhance the patient's sense of well- being to an optimum extent. The inventive method is adap¬ tive, i.e the basic rules for the advice are altered if the relevant factors affecting the patient are changed. Conveniently, the invention is implemented in portable "wallet-size" computers. As appears from the drawing, the method is founded on a knowledge-based computer system or expert system 6 having a reminder function 1, a recording and storage function 2, 3, as well as a function 4 for inductive rule generation. When the system is operating, the reminder function 1 is normally activated. The computer emits a signal when a pharmaceutical preparation is to be taken (or some other activity is to be performed), and advises on the type of preparation to be taken as well as the dosage. In the recording function 2 of the system, the patient confirms that the medicine has been taken, and then indicates his current state of health by responding to questions put to him by the computer. In addition, the patient separately records other relevant events, such as awakening, intake of food, exercise and stress, when these occur, and also indicates his current state of health. These data are stored in a database 3 together with the point of time at issue. Optionally, some information may be automatically retrieved by sensors. The information, which constitutes a situation data¬ base 3, is used for determining relevant relations in time between various events and to generate examples distin¬ guishing the different symptoms that are to be controlled. The examples consist of values for the attributes (affect¬ ing factors) that are relevant, as well as the associated symptom value (conclusion). The attributes used for each preparation are, among others, "latest dosage", "time from intake", and "remaining duration of action". Collections of examples are automatically created every day for each group of symptoms. These collections are accumulated in a "rolling" database, preferably including the values from the last 20 days. The examples are then used in each group of symptoms for spotting, with the aid of prior-art inductive data analysis 4, the rela- tionships that exist, and drafting rules for predicting the symptoms. Inductive data analysis and rule generation are described in, inter alia, the following publications: Quinlan, JR (1979), Discovering Rules by Induction from Large Collections of Examples, Introductory Readings in Expert Systems (D. Michie), pp 33-46, London; Gordon and Breach 1979. Quinlan, JR (1983), Learning from Noisy Data, Proceedings of the International Machine Learning Work- shop, University of Illinois, pp 58-64, 1986. The prediction rules are generated in the form of decision trees and/or so-called conditional rules of the type: IF XK0.12 AND Z3="protein B" AND Zl>0.34 AND Z2=2 THEN RIGIDITY = "excessive agility". The rules are validated by being tested at 5 against borderline cases drawn up on long-term experience. Approv¬ ed rules are transferred to the knowledge base in an expert system 6 in known manner. The expert system may be a conventional rule-based system or be based on fuzzy logic. Then, the expert system is able to predict the state of health of the patient by part predictions of the various symptoms in a specific situation. When in use, the expert system is automatically called at 8 at regular time intervals, preferably every fifth minute. When called, the system is consulted with respect to the current values from the situation database. In consultation, time data are displaced forwards, pre- ferably by a time factor corresponding to the time elaps¬ ing from the intake of a preparation to the attainment of its biophase. This makes it possible for the system to signal before any undesirable effects appear (early warn¬ ing system). The consultation is performed in known manner via "backward chaining", i.e. starting from a desirable conclusion (state of health). Desirable conclusions can be predetermined for every group of symptoms. The expert system operates in real time and can, in each specific situation, find in good time the prerequi- sites and conditions that have to be met to achieve the desired state of health. If this state cannot be achieved in a specific situation (e.g. because the patient has forgotten to act on previous advice), the system looks for the prerequisites for attaining the "second-best" state of health. Induction of rules and updating of the knowledge base are performed automatically by the system, conve¬ niently once every twenty-fourth hour. Because the system learns to detect patterns by induction of real situations, the system can provide individualised medication advice without having access to explicit causal connections and pharmacological data, the prerequisite being that the attributes used directly or indirectly represent patterns that can be classified. According to the invention, the patient records the point of time when he takes the various preparations, the dosage as well as his current state of health. These data are used for generating, by inductive data analysis, prediction rules that are used for providing advice on the point of time and the dosage. For each preparation, one starts from a patient-spe- cific longest nominal duration of action. In the examples, the remaining duration of action as well as the dosage of the latest and the latest-but-one intake are determined. Also other relevant factors, such as the intake of food, state of stress and related time, are also included in the examples. The prediction rules generated by prior-art inductive data analysis are called at predetermined intervals, and a time delay is then introduced, which preferably corre¬ sponds to the time elapsing, in the case of the different preparations, from the intake to the attainment of the biophase. The prediction rules are called by backward chain, primarily in order to satisfy the current situation to attain the desired state of health. If any of the con¬ ditions that can be influenced is not satisfied, e.g. the dosage of a preparation, the system will recommend that this be done. A mode of operation of the invention, intended for controlled, individualised adaptive medication in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, will be described below. In Parkinson's disease, the body cannot produce sufficient amounts of a neurotransmitter in the brain called dopa- mine, which results in limitations of movement, muscular cramp and tremor. This state can be counteracted by the supply of various preparations, such as L-dopa, which are converted to dopamine or the substance bromokriptin. In order to master undesirable side-effects, such as effects on the blood pressure, these preparations generally have to be combined with other medicines. Thus, medication fre¬ quently involves at least three different preparations, each having a specific dosage and a specific time inter¬ val between administrations. Owing to the interactions taking place, the time intervals and the doses have to be adapted to one another. Also external factors, such as the intake of food, exercise and state of stress, affect the action of the preparations. As a result, patients that have been ill for a long time, and thus have had plenty of time to find which medication suits them best, are seldom perfectly untroubled for a whole day. Frequently, there are two or more periods during the day in which they expe¬ rience considerable discomfort in the form of tremor, rigidity and "dullness of mind". Too low a dosage typi- cally results in tremor, rigidity and muscular cramp. Dis¬ comfort caused by overdosage is not less common, manifest¬ ing itself in the form of uncontrolled excessive agility, among other things. The reminder function indicates when the preparations, such as Pravidel, Sinemet, Inderal, Madopark, and Eldepryl, are to be taken, and further pro¬ vides recommendations as to the intake of liquid, food and rest. The recording function includes compulsory input of the state of health expressed as degrees of the attributes "Rigidity", "Agility", "Tremor" and "Dullness of Mind". Recordation is also performed when other important events take place, such as "awakening", "falling asleep", "eat¬ ing" and "drinking". In recordation, the time is indicated in minutes from the awakening. When generating examples, the times elapsing from the intake of the various preparations and events to the pre- sent time are determined. Two times are preferably deter¬ mined for each preparation, namely the time that has elapsed from the latest-but-one intake and the time that has elapsed from the latest intake. A nominal duration of action from the intake is used for the various preparations. When the individual duration of action is known, this is indicated. At the end of each day, a collection of examples with attribute values determined as above is created. The recorded state of health is indicated as conclusion for each example. A collection of examples is thus made for each of the indicated states of health, i.e. one collection of exam¬ ples with the conclusion related to "Rigidity", one col¬ lection related to "Tremor", and one collection related to "Dullness of Mind". Then, rules are induced from the col¬ lections of examples, and the rules are validated by com¬ paring their threshold values with indicated maximum and minimum limits as to dosage and time. If a rule falls outside these limits, the indicated limit values are used. Thereafter, the rules are transferred to the know¬ ledge base in a deductive expert system. The generation of examples, the induction and the transfer to the database are initiated at the end of each day and are perfectly automatic. When using the system, the reminder function is acti¬ vated when the patient starts the computer upon awakening. The reminder function calls the expert system at intervals of preferably about 5 min, and the expert system is thus consulted with respect to the data recorded. In consultation, an advance time corresponding to the average time elapsing from the intake of a preparation to its com¬ menced action, is added to the real time. Preferably, the advance time is 30 min. Consequently, the system will be able to issue reminders in good time.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method for controlled, individualised medica- tion, c h a r a c t e r i s e d by recording, every time the patient takes his medicine, the type of medicine, the dose and the point of time in a database, recording information on the patient's state of heal on recurrent occasions in the database, analysing the information recorded in the database b means of inductive data analysis in order to establish medication rules on the basis of detected relationships between the patient's intake of medicine and his state of health, comparing the established medication rules with pre¬ determined medication conditions for approval, using the approved rules for continuously deciding whether medication is to be performed and, if so, deciding the type of medicine and the dose, and repeating the analysis of the database for conti¬ nuously optimising the medication rules with the aid of new information recorded in the database and for adapting the rules to changes in the patient's state of health. 2. A method as set forth in claim 1, c h a r a c ¬ t e r i s e d by the medication comprising the admini¬ stration of at least two different medicines. 3. A method as set forth in claim 1 or 2, c h a r ¬ a c t e r i s e d by also recording information on the patient's intake of food and his activities in the data¬ base, and taking this information into consideration when establishing the medication rules. 4. A method as set forth in any one of the preceding claims, c h a r a c t e r i s e d by always recording the patient's state of health when recording his intake of medicine. 5. A method as set forth in any one of the preced¬ ing claims, c h a r a c t e r i s e d by calculating the relations in time between various external events recorded and the state of health recorded. 6. A method as set forth in any one of the preced¬ ing claims, c h a r a c t e r i s e d by allotting a duration of action to each medicine, and continuously calculating the remaining duration of action of the medicine taken. 7. A method as set forth in any one of the preced¬ ing claims, c h a r a c t e r i s e d by using the dose and the remaining duration of action as attributes in the inductive data analysis. 8. A method as set forth in any one of the preced- ing claims, c h a r a c t e r i s e d by being used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. 9. A device for controlled, individualised medica¬ tion, c h a r a c t e r i s e d by means (2) for record ing information on the intake of medicine and the pa- tient's state of health, a database (3) for storing this information, a program (4) for performing an inductive analysis of the information stored in the database and establishing medication rules on the basis of detected relationships between the intake of medicine and the patient's state of health, memory means (5) for storing predetermined medication conditions, means (5) for com¬ paring the medication rules established by means of the program for performing inductive analysis and the pre¬ determined medication conditions for approval of the medi cation rules, an expert system (6) where the approved rules are used for deciding whether medication is to be performed and, if so, which type of medicine and what dos should be given, means (7) for activating the program for inductive analysis at given points of time, and means (8) for polling the expert system at given points of time.

Inventors: SILLEN RUDOLF VALENTIN, WESSBERG GOERAN, SILLEN, RUDOLF, VALENTIN, WESSBERG, GOERAN
Applicants: SILLEN RUDOLF VALENTIN, WESSBERG GOERAN, SILLEN, RUDOLF, VALENTIN, WESSBERG, GOERAN
Application year: 1993
Main classification: G06F15
IPC codes: A61J3, A61J7, G06F19, G06Q50