CELLULOSE INJECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD

Abstract: Improved techniques are provided for controlling the injection of a cellulose powder/water mixture input into a formation through an injection well for recovery of hydrocarbons. The initial dosing rate of powder added to the water is increased as a function of both the monitored pressure of the mixture in the wellbore in the vicinity of the formation, and the monitored flow rate of the injected mixture. The water flow rates and the flow dosing rates are optimised, and the mixture is controlled to obtain setting within the formation to enhance the recovery of hydrocarbons. A mixing tank is designed to prevent premature setting of the mixture. Portable equipment is provided for injecting the powder/water mixture into the formation, thereby increasing the versatility of the equipment reducing the overall costs of the recovery operation.

Description: Cellulose Injection system and method. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to equipment and techniques for recovering oil from water invaded hydrocarbon fields, and more particularly, relates to improved water flooding techniques and equipment for increasing die efficiency of oil recovery operations. Background of the Invention Water flood is a standard technique used to increase oil recovery from hydrocarbon fields. In a typical application, a plurality of injection wells at spaced locations in an older, somewhat depleted oil field are used to enhance the production of oil from production wells also spaced about the field. Pressurized water flows from an injection well through the permeable formation toward the relatively low pressure production well, which recovers oil with some water as the water flows through the formation toward the producing well. Those skilled in the art have long appreciated that while water flowing through the formation inherently carries some oil to the recovery well, water also tends over time to flow along the same well- established flow channels, which decreases the efficiency of the oil recovery operation. As a result of water flowing along these established flow channels, the water thus tends to entrain a smaller proportion of oil, so that the "water cut" of the produced fluids eventually exceeds the cost of separating the produced oil/water mixture into an economic hydrocarbon-based product. To improve the recovery of oil using water flooding techniques, those skilled in the art have recognized the benefit of blocking established water channels through the formation to force the injected water to find new channels and thereby entrain new oil which is recovered with the water. U.S. Patent 4,194,563 discloses a technique for improving water flooding operations by injecting a course emulsion into flow channels in the formation, then washing the wellbore with alcohol to remove the emulsion formed adjacent the wellbore. U.S. Patent 4,529,523 teaches a method of enhancing water flooding by using a hydroxyethyl cellulose to prevent fingering of water through existing flow channels in the formation. U.S. Patent 4,903,768 teaches a technique for controlling the profile of an oil/water interface in a high permeability zone, with either water flooding or carbon dioxide stimulation being used as the driving process. A breakthrough is shut-in using a temperature activated mixture which forms a solid blocking gel. Those skilled in the art of water flooding also appreciate that an oil/water emulsion may be used to plug or at least reduce flow in a highly porous zone, thereby preventing undesirable water fingering and improving the flow of hydrocarbons to a recovery well. U.S. Patent 3,472,319 teaches a technique for mixing an oil-in- water emulsion with a minimum of shear energy. The mixture is injected into the formation as a low viscosity emulsion, so that the oil droplets swell in the formation to plug or partially plug existing water channels. U.S. Patent 3,724,546 teaches using a blood/ water mixture for a water flooding operation. While various products have been used for injection with the water to assist in the water flooding operation by blocking or partially blocking the established flow channels, cellulose is a preferred injection product for many water flooding applications. The use of cellulose as a mixing material with the injection water is according well known, as evidenced by U.S. Patents 3,848,673, 4,321 ,968, 4,451,389, 4,627,494, 4,629,575, and 5, 100,567. The concentration of cellulose which is injected with the water into the formation may be varied. By optimising the fluid injection rates, the recovery of hydrocarbons can be increased during the secondary or tertiary recovery processes. U.S. Patent 4,374,544 and European Publication 48 342 disclose techniques for optimising injection rates while also preventing fracturing of the formation, which may reduce the effectiveness of the oil recovery process. Those skilled in the art of secondary and tertiary recovery of oil have generally recognized the benefits of trailer mounted mixing and injection devices, such as those disclosed in an article entitled "Enhanced Recovery Requires Special Equipment", Oil and Gas Journal, July 12, 1976, pp. 50-56. U.S. Patent 4,448,535 discloses portable apparatus for blending sands and solid additives at selected rates for injection with water into a well. A dry chemical is preferably fed into a mixing tank adjacent a variable venture nozzle, where the water is at a low pressure and is in high shear. European Patent Application No. 91309842.2 teaches a technique for mixing a solid and a fluid continuously to facilitate a gravel packing operation. A solids hopper with an internal auger is used to monitor the solids flow rate, with liquid being directed into the mixing chamber around the periphery of the auger. U.S. Patent 4,311,395 discloses a chassis arrangement for mounting equipment used in well servicing operations. U.S. Patent 4,077,428 teaches a transportable water injection plant for a water flooding operation. U.S. Patent 4,534,869 teaches a portable filtration system with a three stage filtering process useful for a fracking operation. U.S. Patent 4,597,437 discloses a portable plumbing and production assembly for use in hydrocarbon operations. U.S. Patent 4,518,261 discloses a process for dissolving a polyacrylamide powder in an aqueous solution for enhanced oil recovery. In order to prevent moisture build up and caking of the powder, a nitrogen blanket may be used. Polymers mixed with injection water in a flooding process may be transported to a mixer with dry air, as disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,014,527. Systems for controlling the injection of a gel-type fluid into a well are disclosed in U.S. Patents 3,707, 191, 4,265,266, and 4,953,618. Equipment for mixing a dry material with water are disclosed in U.S. Patents 3,902,558, 4,357,953, 4,725,379, and 5, 190,374. Although a great deal of effort has thus been expended to improve the recovery of oil using water flooding techniques, further improvements in this technology and associated reductions in the cost of recovery operations are essential if partially depleted hydrocarbon fields are to supply an increasing role in meeting future oil needs. Huge quantities of proven low pressure oil reserves exist in many parts of the world, and versatile equipment and improved techniques are required to economically recover those reserves. The disadvantages of the prior art are overcome by the present invention, and improved oil recovery equipment and techniques are hereinafter disclosed for more efficiently recovering oil from depleted fields. Summary of the Invention According to the present invention, a cellulose powder is mixed with water and the mixture injected downhole into the formation. The cellulose powder hydrates with the water approximately thirty minutes after mixing, when the water is preferably within the formation, to form a highly viscous mixture which blocks old water channels, thereby forcing the injected water to find new channels through the formation and thereby entraining more oil which is carried toward the production wells. The cellulose powder and the injection water are mixed in a low viscosity vortex mixing chamber which is trailer mounted to facilitate transportation to various well sites. A nitrogen blanket is preferably used to prevent moisture build up and exclude the entry of oxygen into the system, which may damage the oil recovery operations, or adversely affect the formation or the formation fluids. The technique of this invention may be used to accurately control the injection of a cellulose powder, such as hydroxyethylcellulose, into a formation to enhance oil recovery. The cellulose powder may be mixed with available injection well water, and the mixture pumped through various injection wells into the porous formations to efficiently block the well-established or existing flow channels. Computer software allows the system to be easily adapted to specific well and formation conditions. The accurate control of the proportion of the hydroxyethylcellulose mixed with the injection well water is regulated to optimise the resistance to water flow through the porous formation, thereby minimizing short-circuiting of water from the injection well to the recovery well and accordingly increasing the efficiency of the oil recovery operation. The present invention uses special equipment and techniques to determine the proper flowrate and the proper cellulose dosage for maximising the desired blocking effect on established water channels. A control system according to the present invention is provided for receiving operator input and for determining an adequate flowrate and the desired concentration of cellulose for injection with the pre¬ determined water flowrate. Annulus and tubing head pressure at the water injection well are monitored. The flowrate is increased from the minimum flowrate to the maximum allowed by the pumping equipment, and tubing head pressure is monitored to allow the choice of the correct flowrate according to the ability of the well to dissipate the mixture. The cellulose injection rate is increased and/or decreased until the maximum permissible annulus and tubing head pressure is reached but not exceeded. Changing the cellulose injection rates thus varies the viscosity of the water/cellulose mixture downhole, and thus desirably creates the plugging effect on existing water channels. The technique of this invention thus increases the accuracy of the dosing rate for the cellulose powder, and allows full monitoring and recording for each injection. Polymers other than cellulose may also be mixed with water to form the mixture to be pumped downhole. Any additive could be injected into the cellulose/water mixture by a chemical injection pump after mixing and before the pumps. In a suitable embodiment, the improved equipment used for performing the operation comprises four transportable modules each interlinked through local and centralized control systems: 1) a pumping/injection trailer; 2) a cellulose mixing and control trailer; 3) a power generation/utilities trailer; and 4) a bulk powder tanker. Injection fluid pressure, temperature, and flowrate measurements may be taken with suitable monitoring equipment, and signals from this equipment may be linked through a remote terminal unit to a supervisory/control computer. The system may be capable of operating at surface temperatures of from -40 °C to +40 °C, thereby enhancing its versatility. It is an object of this invention to provide improved techniques for monitoring various injections conditions, such as injection well pressure, injection fluid flowrates, and injection water inlet temperature, and in response to these conditions, adjusting the flow and dosing rate of the powder which will cause optimum downhole blocking of the well established flow channels to increase the efficiency of the recovery operation. Another object of this invention is obtained by providing versatile equipment which can be effectively used at various oil field sites to more efficiently recover hydrocarbons. Still another object of this invention is to provide improved techniques and equipment which can more efficientiy recover hydrocarbons from somewhat depleted oil fields, thereby making possible the economical recovery of hydrocarbons which are not being recovered by existing technology. It is a feature of this invention that the techniques for adjusting the powder dosing rate, as well as any combination of dosing rate and flowrate, may be automatically controlled to easily and inexpensively achieve a more optimum injection rate. Yet another feature of this invention is that the equipment for performing the improved water flooding techniques may be portable, thereby increasing the versatility of the equipment. Most of the system comrxments have been individually used and rested in previous oil recovery operations, so that the reliability of the system is high and the equipment cost is comparatively low. The advantage of the present invention is that the technique for determining the correct dosing rate is well suited for various powder polymer materials which serve to block the well-established flow cnannels when injected with water into a rormation. The oosing tecnmαue ot the present invention is particularly well suited r ' or use with a cellulose material, wmcn is widely used as an addition for mixing with water to Deπorm a water flooding techmcue. Another advantage of the invention is mat the equipment is caoaDle of reliable operation over a wide range of ambient temperatures, and is particularly adapted for use in oil fields having relatively coid amoient temperatures. A further advantage of the invention is that the technique used may also ODtimise the injection by combining flowrate and dosing rate parameters in order to ODtain the oest injection mixture conditions tor a particular injecuon well. Thus according to the present invention there is provided a method of controlling the injection of a powder/water mixture through an injection well and into a formation for recovery of hydrocarbons, the method comprising: (a) determining a desired mixture injection flow rate: (b) selecting an initial dosage rate of powder; (c) mixing the selected initial dosage rate of powder and water to form an initial powder/water mixture ration; (d) injecting the powder/water mixture through the injection well and into the formation: (e) monitoring the pressure of the powder/water mixture in the well bore in the vicinity of the formation during step (d) ; (f) increasing the selected initial dosage rate of powder to increase the powder/ water mixture ratio: (g) determining a high dosage rate of powder obtained when the monitored pressure reaches a predetermined limit: and (h) thereafter setting the dosing rate between the initial dosing rate and the high dosing rate for injecting the mixture into the formation. According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a system for controlling the injection of a powder/water mixture through an injection well and into a formation for recovery of hydrocarbons, the system comprising; a mixing tank for mixing a selected initial dosage rate of powder witii water to form an initial powder/water mixture ratio; a pressure sensor for monitoring the pressure of the mixture in the well bore: fluid control means for maintaining a desired flowrate of the mixture into the injection well; a flowmeter for monitoring the flowrate of the mixture injected into the injection well; and dosing control means for automatically increasing the selected initial dosing rate of powder at a rate functionally related to the monitored pressure and the monitored flow rate. According to a third aspect of the invention there is provided a system for controlling the miection or a powoer/water mixture through an injection well and into a formation for recovery of hydrocarbons, the system comprising; a portable tanKer for storage of cellulose powder: a portable hopper ror housing cellulose powder; a portable compressed air source for transporting the cellulose powder rrom tne tanker ro tne hopper; a portaole mixmg tank for mixing a selected initial dosage rate of powder with water to rorm an initial powder/water mixture ratio: a portaDle convevor ror conveying the cellulose powder from tne hopper to the mixing tanx: a pressure sensor ror monitoring the pressure of the mixture in the weil bore: a flowmeter ror monitoring the flowrate of the mixture injected into the miection weil: and dosing control means ror automaticaih increasmg the selected initial Josmg rate or powder ar a rare runcπonally relared to the monitored pressure and tne monitored flowrate. the control means including means ror aαiustmg the flowrate ot cellulose powder along the conveyor. According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a method of recovering oil from a hydrocarbon field, which method includes delivering a mixture of a gel-forming material and water downhole so that the gel-forming material hydrates to form a viscous gel after delivery, and which method further comprises monitoring the back-pressure of the mixture and varying in response thereto the concentration of the gel-forming material in the mixture to vary the viscosity of the gel downhole. Brief Description of the Drawings Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of portable equipment according to the present invention for receiving water from a supply line, for adding the desired amount of cellulose powder to the water, and for injecting the powder/water mixture into an injection well for a water flooding operation. Fig. 2 is a block diagram of suitable control logic for regulating the screw conveyor generally shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 3 is a block diagram of suitable control logic for regulating the choke valve generally shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 4 is a block diagram of suitable logic for controlling the transfer of cellulose powder according to this invention. Fig. 5 is a block diagram of suitable logic for operating the injection pumps generally shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 6 is a block diagram of suitable logic for controlling the dosing of cellulose according to the present invention. Fig. 7 illustrates a graph of the automatic search for powder dosage rate as a function of time according to this invention. Fig. 8 is an alternative graph of the powder dosage rate as a function of time when a pressure high limit is reached at the well head. Detailed Descπpπon or a Preferred Embodiment Fig. 1 schematically illustrates one emoooiment ot an equipment assemoly iccoroing to the present invention ror perrorming a water flooding operauon to -ecover oil from a partially depleted, low pressure production field. The assemoly .0 is oortaole. so tnat the eouipment may oe easily transported from one injection Aeil to another, and/or trom a production field to another, thereby reducing overall ecuipment costs. The primary components of the assembly 10 are mounted on one ot four trailers: a pumping/ utilities trailer ι2. a cellulose mixing ano control trailer .4. a power generator/ utilities trailer 16. ano a Dulk trailer 18. Each tra er may be - conventional transport trailer wnicn accordingly may oe easily positioned at a esireo location aoout the production field. The water flooding operation utilises an -v aiiaoie water source, wnicn mav oe output trom a site water supply WS pipeline. The assemDiy lO mixes tne water witn a cellulose powoer. and injects the mixture own one ot a plurality or selectively positioned injection wells IJ. so that more oil " ■ "lay oe recovered from the production field. Depending on the particular type of • ".ater flooding technique utilised, on may De simultaneously recovered from one or -".ore or a plurality of production weils (not shown) spaced about the field. Recovered water trom supply WS (production water, waste water, πver water or a mixture ot one or more ot these water supply sources) may be pressuπzed by suitable eouipment not depicted m F * g. i . Pressuπzed water used for injection is first pressure-regulated DV cnoke vaive ι . wnicn is automatically responsive to the level control device 36 provided on mixing tam 35 to maintain the desired water levei in :ne mixing tani . Before oeing passed to tame 35. the water prererably is filtered to -eouce eouipment wear and damage to tne formation, and suitable hydrocycione filters 32 are thus provided between the cnoκe vaive 31 and the mixing tank 35. Waste skip o7 may aiso oe provided on trailer 1-t for storage of the discharge from the filters 32. λ high dehverv control valve 33 ano a low delivery control valve 34 are provided in parallel between the filters 32 and the tan 35. and the operator may control each \alve as a tunction ot the desired iniection water flowrate to create a vortex in the mixing tank 35. The operator therefore determines a desired injection flowrate into an injection weil utilizing conventional technioues. and then regulates die control \alves to achieve that desired flowrate. Since the quantity of dosing mateπal added is relatively small, the desired or optional injection flowrate is. for practical purposes. the desired or optimal water flowrate to the mixing tank. The cellulose/ water mixture from the mixing tank 35 passes through flowmeter - . ano then to pumping trailer 12. where the mixture is pressurized to a selected pressure by one or two injection pumps 45 mounted in parallel on the trailer 12. The mixture is then transmitted through a series of conventional valves to a selected injection weil 13 as shown in Fig. 1. The mixture is injected into the formation and is pushed in the direction of the production wells with the injected water serving to entrain the oii in the formation and carry it toward the production weils. According :o this invention, the ceilulose is dispersed in the water at a desired rate within the mixing tank 35. but hydration is delayed due to the mixing process. Each injection pump 45 is driven by a variable speed motor 78 so that the desired iniection flowrate ror an individual weil may be achieved by controlling the speed of the pumps 45. Each of the main pumps 45 may thus be powered by a double wound motor 78. so .hat each pump may operate at two different pump speeds. Alternatively, each pump 45 may operate at a continuously variable speed if a variable speed drive motor is utilised. The bulk trailer 18 inciudes a conventional tanker 51 for housing ceilulose powoer. Compressed a r from the generator trailer 16 pressuπzes the ranker 51 to a desired pressure levei. e.g., slightly greater than ambient pressure. Transmitters 52 may be provided for monitoring the level of powder within the tanker 51. The pressure regulator 64 and a flow control orifice or flow choke 63 on the trailer 14 may thus be adjusted to set the air pressure in the tanker 51 at a desired level. The fluid pressure within the tanker may be monitored by pressure transmitter 53. Nitrogen bottles 85 may be provided on the bulk trailer 18 for subjecting the powder in the tanker 51 to inert gas when the powder is not being delivered to the hopper 42. In response to a signal from the powder hopper 42, one of the product valves 55 is opened to deliver powder from the tanker 51 through the flexible line 95 to the feed hopper 42. Blowdown control valves 59 and 62 may be used to adjust the pressure in the flexible line 95. Flow control of the regulated air may also be set by a suitable nozzie 97 to provide a consistent blow of air pressure higher than that present in the • -ameer 51. Fluidizing pads 54 on tne tanker 51 keep tine powder flowing to the production vaives 55. Duπng start-up. or if the flow line to the hopper 42 should oecome pluggeα. proαucπon vaives 55 may be closed and only pressuπzed air blown own the transfer iine 95. When tne level of powder in the hopper ^2 drops below me iow ievei switch -to. the powder control vaives 60 and 61 are openeα to start the air flow αown the transfer line 95. After predetermined period of time, e.g., two seconds, proαuct valves 55 are opened. Powoer is then supplied to the hopper 42 until the hign level switch 41 is covered with powder, (or alternatively after a preselected time peπoα nas expired), at whicn time the product valves 55 are closed ano the transfer line 95 cleaned with pressuπzed air. The oesired αosage rate of powoer is supplied to the tank 35 from die hopper -2 by the screw conveyor 39 ano the vibrating table 37 simDiistically shown in Fig. .. The vaπaoie sσeec screw conveyor 39 is calibrated for supplying powoer to the mixing tank at a oesireα dosing rate. The mixing tank 35 inciudes two angied water miets. with each iniet cεing in rluio communication with one of the valves 33 ano 34 :o create a vortex within the mixing tank. Either or both of the valves 33 and 34 may be opened by the operator, depenαing on desired water flowrate to the mixing tank and thus to the injection weil. Cellulose powoer from the vibrating table 37 may be added to the center of me voπex to ensure that the powoer is evenly mixed with the water. The powoer remains for a suDstantially uniform and shoπ durauon time within rhe mixing tam 35 berore oemg oiscnarged to the pumps 45. A control panel cό on the trailer 14 inciudes a primary or supervisory/ control computer 82. a personal computer 84 with a data entry keyboard, and an audible or * . isual alarm 86. Computer 82 receives a flowrate signal from the flowmeter 44. and transmits a powder flowrate signal to the vaπable speed screw conveyor 39 to supply powder to the mixing tank 35 at the desired dosing rate. The desired dosing rate signal may be expressed as a function of a dosing percentage rate multiplied by the flowrate signal from tne flowmeter 44. then divided by a constant that is derived from the calibration for the oaracular product in use. to yield the powder flowrate signal which controls the revolutions of the conveyor 39 to supply the desired quantity of powder to be mixed with the injection water. A tacho feedback loop 38 is provided to ensure that the correct conveyor speed is achieved. The computer 82 and the tacho - -> - U - 58 thus regulate the rate mat powoer added to the injection water, and monitor the powoer addition rate ana the actual conveyor speeα to provide the proper dosing rate. The air space 94 above tne water m the mixing tank 35 is preferably pressuπzed with nitrogen or another inert gas to ensure mat moisture is suppressed from πsing, since tne premature comoination of moisture ana the powder adversely affect the operation of the system. A nitrogen olanket in the space 94 also ensures that oxygen is not entrained in the injection water/powαer mixture, thereby minimizing corrosion of the tubuiar stπngs in the injection well ana proauction wells, as well as damage to the formation ana formation fluids. Nitrogen may be supplied to the tank 35 from botdes 3 mounted on the trailer i . The water levei in the mixing tank 35 is thus regulated by choke vaive 31. which in turn is controlled by a dedicated choke vaive controller 96. As expiaineα subseαuentiy. controller 96 receives a signal from the mixing tank level transmitter 36. ana compares tne transmitter signal with a requested mixing tan levei signal input to the controller oy tne computer 82. Two αiesei generators 75 ana 76 are mounted on the trailer 16 for generating electrical power, with eacn generator oeing fueled by diesel tank 71. A diesel transport unit 80 is provideα for intermittendy filling the tank 71. In a suitable example, the generator " 5 may oe a i5 kilowatt air-cooled generator for supplying singie phase 220 voit A.C. power, wnile the generator 76 is a 395 kilowatt water- cooied generator for suopiying ooth three phase 380 volt and singie phase 220 voit power. The generator 76 temperature shouid be above -10" C before it is staπed. and accordingly the generator 75 may oe initially staπed at a colder temperature, and the power from the generator 75 useα to heat the oil sump of generator 76 before the generator 76 is staπed. Those skilled in the an wiil appreciate that generators 75 and 76 may not be necessary :f the proauction field is located where another power suppiy, such as a 380 voit AC supply, is available. Generator control panel 73 is mounted on the trailer 16. ana inciudes a computer 88. pump controls 90. and motor controls 92. Generators 75 ana 76 thus supply electncal power to emergency battenes 74, which also serve as a D.C. power supply. The pump motors 78, and other motors (not shown) which may be provided on any one of the trailers, are thus powered by the generators. A transformer 98 may be used to charge emergency batteries 74. Three pnase. 380 voit power is thus available tor dπving the motors 78. and the motor (not snown) wnicn powers the air compressor 56 which pressuπzes receiver or tanic 57. Singie onase. 220 voit power may oe used for pump control logic for απvmg the motors ror the screw conveyor 39. ana for poweπng a D.C. power supply ror oatteπes 74. Power from the 24 volt D.C. supply may be used for logic control. ana for poweπng tne computers. Althougn not shown in Fig. 1. those skilled in the art wiil unαerstanα mat the generator trailer 16 may also include convenuonai power ana engine momtoπng eauipment. as weil as automatic shut-down equipment. Water rlusmng tank 46 provideα on tne pumping trailer provides a water supply source in case or loss of the supply from the anticipated water source, and -""roviαes water for c.εan-αown of the injection well ana for clean down of the eauipment before relocation or the eauipment. Fiush pump 47 is controlled by the offloaα control \ aives 107 on the trailer 12. To reαuce the power required to start tne pumps 45. an automatic o f-loaαmg system is also proviαeα. The eauipment snown in Fig. 1 is aesignea to reauce tne ukeiihooa of powaer mixing with water oπor to Deing intentionally mixeα in the mixing tank 35. so that mixture will set at its αesireα location witnin tne porous rormation. and will not set prematurely. The assemoiy as snown in Fig. 1 is. however, also constructed for quick disassembly, so that blockages causeα bv premature setting may be easily cleared and the system property mamtaineα. Fig. 2 illustrates suitable control logic i 10 for regulating the soeeα of motor 1 16 wnicn απves tne conveyor 29 shown in Fig. 1. The control panel 1 14 icnematicaJK iilustrateα in Fig. 2 may oe the personal computer 84 depicted in Fig. 1. and the computer 1 12 similarly illustrated in Fig. 2 may be the computer 82 shown .n Fig. 1. The computer 1 12 generates a desired dosage signal. Qhr. which is transmitted as signal 120 to the control panel 1 14 Flowmeter 44 thus generates a flowrate signal. Q. wnich is shown in Fig. 2 as 128. which signal is input to the computer 1 12. The same flowrate signal Q is also input as signal 130 to the conorol panel 1 14. Control panel 1 14 generates the dosing signal 122 to the screw conveyor motor 1 16. with the signal 122 being a function of the Qhr signal 120 and the flowrate signal 130. The signal 122 thus serves to control the operation of the motor 1 16 at the αesired soeeα. The screw conveyor tacno 38 in Fig. 1 generates a feed - I D - back loop signal 124 to tne control panel 114 to ensure that the conveyor is operating at its proper speed. The speed ot the conveyor motor 116 is also input as signal 126 :o the computer 112 :o serve as a cneci on the proper determination of the dosing rate. Computer 112 may activate an aiarm (see 86 in Fig. 1) if the actual speed of rhe motor 116 does not corresDonα. witnm a selected range, to the desired dosing rate of powder to the mixing tanK 25. Fig. 3 illustrates suitaole logic 140 for controlling the flow of water to the mixing tank 35. A tanK levei signal 156 is transmitted from the transmitter 36 to the choke vaive controller 96. ano a simiiar signal 158 is transmitted to computer 146. wnich functionally may oe tne computer 82 shown in Fig. 1. The controller 96 outputs a control signal 150 to the cnoκe valve 31 to regulate the fluid flowrate to the mixing tank. The cnoke vaive 31 includes a valve position indicator 142. which transmits a vaive position signal 152 to tne controller 96 to monitor the actual choke position ana ensure tnat tne vaive is property positioned by the controiler. This same vaive position signai may OQ transmuted as signal 154 to the computer 146. so that the computer 146 may compare the signals 158 and 154. and then generate a requested tank ievei signal 160 to the controller 96. Controller 96 receives signal 156 from tne levei transmitter 36 ana compares this signal with the requested mixing tank level inDut signal 160 from the computer 146. The output signal 150 from the controller 96 is effectively transmitted as the choke position signal 154 back to the computer 146. so that computer ι4b effectively receives both the tank level signal ana the choke valve control signal to provide monitoring and alarm functions. Fig. 4 illustrates suitable control logic 170 for transferring powder from the tanker 51 to the hopper -2. The operation is initiated with at start step 172. and comparator 174 initially determines tnat the pressure P in the tanker is less than the preset value, which may be selected to be 1.1 Barg. If the tanker pressure is more than 1.1 Barg. step 174 first closes the tanker pressurization valve 61 as shown in Fig. 1 at step 178. If the tank pressure is less than the set 1.1 Barg value, operation step 176 opens the pressuπzation valve. Decision step 180 then determines if the low levei switch 40 on the hopper 42 is set. and if set. the blowdown values 59 and 62 as shown in Fig. 1 are opened by step 182. Step 184 starts timer A, and comparator 186 determines if timer A exceeds a selected value. X, which selected value representatively may oe 2 seconαs. Once the time is greater than 2 seconds, the tanker pressuπzauon vaive 61 and the product valve 55 are opened by steps 188 and 190. respectively. A second timer B may then be started by step 192. and comparator 194 useα to determine it the time set by timer B is greater than a selected r.umoer of seconαs. X. If the time is greater than X. an alarm is sounded by step 198. Assuming, however, that the time is less than X. decision step 196 determines :f the switch 40 has been reset. Assuming the switch 40 has been reset, decision step 200 determines if the high level switch 41 has been set. Once that product control vaive 55 is closed by step 202. then the tanker pressurization valve 61 is closed by step 204. Step 206 starts a third timer C. and comparator 208 determines if time is greater than a seiecteα time. X. Assuming the proper time has transpired, blowdown line vaiues 59 ana 62 are closed by steυ 210. A suitable logic αiagram 220 for controlling the injection pumps 45 is depicted .n Fig. 5. Step 222 generates a staπ pump request signal, and decision step 224 determines if the interlock nag is properiy set. If the interlock flag is not set. step 226 sets the interlock nag. Step 22S opens the air valves 58 which will supply air .o open the offloading vaives 48. Decision step 230 determines that the offloading vaives have been properiy opened, then step 232 staπs one of the pumps 45 in the star configuration, witn timer A then staπmg as shown in step 234. Comparator 236 determines that time is aσove a selected value. X. Once time is greater than X, step 228 stops and resets the timer A. Operation step 240 switches the motor 45 to the delta configuration, and the offloading valves are closed by step 242. The interlock nag is reset by step 244. Decision steo 246 checks that the stop pump request signal :s not active. When the request signal is activated, step 248 opens the off loading vaive and another timer B is snπed by step 250. Assuming the request signal is acuve. step 248 opens the offloading valves, and another timer B is staπed by step 250. Step 252 ensures that the offloading valves are opened and. if not opened. comparator 254 determines whether the elapsed time is greater than X. Step 256 stops and resets the timer B. and the pumps 45 are stopped by step 258. Fig. 6 depicts the control logic 260 for controlling the powder dosing rate according to the present invention. The main program loop staπs at step 262, where the program waits for a staπ signal. The staπ signal initializes the program variables at step 264. Flow totalization is initiated at step 266. ana a start task signal is .nitiateα by 268. Step 270 ensures that the totalization is set to 0. The comparator 272 determines that the injection water flowrate signal is not less than a selected value. F. Comparator 2 "" 4 determines that the totalized flow is less than a selected e.g., 15 cuoic meters, ana decision step 2S2 determines that the cycle count is less than 1. If totalization is more than 15 cubic meters, comparator 278 determines wnether tne pressure is less than a preselected value and, if not. the flag is set at step 276. If rhe pressure is greater than the preselected vaiue. step 280 determines if the initial dosing rate has been set. If the dosing rate has not been set. step 288 sets the αosing rate, step 290 sets Qstol to 0. and comparator 292 determines that the flowrate is less man a selected value. Comparator 294 similarly determines .f the totalized flow is less man ι5 CUPIC meters. Step 296 checks the dosmg rate. and comparator 298 determines if the dosmg rate is greater than a selected value. The dosing rate may oe restored to a lower value by step 300. Step 302 asks if the cycle count is 0. and if so. an operator is aierted at step 320. Step 322 waits for the operator response. If it is determined that the dosing value results in a lower than preselected maximum pressure, rhe dosing value is stepped up at step 325 by a selected value, e.g.. 0. I T- as αescnoeα subsequently. Step 326 determines whether the operator wishes to continue dosing at the maximum dosmg rate. If the decision -S to continue the maximum dosing rate, then a timer is reset at step 304. Step 306 starts the timer, and step 308 checi s to be sure that the elapsed time is less man 4 hours. If so. the flowrate is cnec ed at step 312 to ensure that the injection flowrate is greater than a selected vaiue. e.g.. 0.5 cubic meters per hour. If the injection rate is less than the selected an aiarm is sounded at 338. Comparator 316 ensures that the annulus pressure Pa is less than the selected maximum pressure. Pm. and also ensures that the injection tubing pressure Pt is less than its respective preselected value. Assuming both pressures are less than their maximum values, comparator 318 checks whether the total weight of the added dosmg powder is less than the set maximum αosing weight. Once all the dosmg powder has been added to the mixer 35. dosing is stopped at step 330, and the selected dosmg vaπables are set to 0 at step 332. At step 334, the totalized mixture flow is checked to be sure that it is greater than a selected value, e.g., 30 cubic meters and, if so. step 336 signals that the process is complete. If the eiapsed time at step 308 is greater than 4 hours, the cycle counter is set to 0 at step 310. and the time is set to 0 at step 314 and stopped. At step 340. the injection well annulus pressure and tubing pressures are cnec ed. If the monitor pressures exceed their respective preselected values, the set dosmg rate is checked at step 342. Step 344 reduces the dosing rate by a selected value, e.g., 0.1 %. At step 346. the minimum dosing rate is set to Qhr, and at step 348 the maximum dosing rate may be set at 1.0% . At step 350. all dosing is stopped. At step 352. the cycle count is incremented, and step 354 checks the cycle count. If the cycie count is greater than 4. the flag is set at step 356 to indicate the aonormai end of dosing, with the pump being stopped at step 358. The pump may also be stopped in response to decision step 284. which checks the pressures Pa and Pt previously discussed. If the pressures are too high, the alarm is acuvated at step 286. and the pump stopped at step 358. To reduce tne required size of the generator 76 and to minimize stresses on the pumps 45. the pumps are preferably staπed and stopped in a desired offloading \aive sequence, as referred to briefly above. The starting sequence for the pumps 45 is as follows. The computer 88 in the generator control cabinet 73 sends a request ;o start signal to the motor controls 92 to initiate a pump staπ signal for one of the two pumps 45. As long as the other of the two pumps is not being staπed. the offloao valve 48 is opened, and the appropriate pump motor is staπed in a star configuration. After a set penod of time which allows the motor to come up to speed, the configuration of the pump motor is switched to deita. and the offload valve -8 is closed to bnng the system into operation. To deactivate the pump, a stop signal from the computer 88 causes the offload valve 48 to open, and then the pump motor is shut off. If desired, the activated pump motor may also be shut off after it has been activated for a set penod of time. The desired pump injection rate can be achieved by operating the desired pump at the desired motor speed, or by operating both pumps and at a selected one of the two motor speeds. Referring to Figs. 7 and 8. the software control functionality of the technique according to the present invention is illustrated by injection powder dose v. time graphs. Referring to Fig 1. it should be understood that the computer 82 receives a weil-tubmg pressure signal Pt from transmitter 49, and receives a well annulus pressure signal Pa from transmitter 50. The transmitted pressure signal Pa is indicative ot the cellulose/ water mixture pressure in the vicinity of the formation. A similarly monitored injection water inlet temperature value may be input on computer 34 periodically by the oDerator. Using the personal computer 84. an operator may input the maximum αesireα wonαng pressure for the well annulus. the tubmg wellhead and the total αuantity of ceilulose powder to be injected. The computer 82 monitors the signals from tne transmitters 49 and 50 and the injection flowrate signal from the flowmeter 44 Atter a seiecteα quantity of water, e.g., 15 cuoic meters, has Deen injected onto the weil without any cellulose (represented by line 422 in Fig 7), ceilulose is aαded to the mixing tanic 35 according to a selected sequence. Referring to Fig. 7. a maximum αosing rate of 2.3 % powαer to fluid injection . ater may oe set. Powαer is initially dosed at a 0.1 percent rate, ana assuming that ne monitored pressure rrom the transmitters 49 and 50 have not been exceeded, the cosing rate is increased oy 0 1 percent, as shown by the stepped line portion 412 in Fig. 7. If the maximum annulus pressure is reached, the maximum dosing rate snould be reduced (see line 414). ana the addition of powder is stopped, as shown by line 424. The dosing rate reDresented by line 414 is entered into computer 82 as the rate Qhr discussed above. A predetermined αuantity of water is then injected with o ceilulose powder, as evidence oy line 426. and dosmg is then restarted at a selected level, represented at line 428. with this selected level being between the imual dosmg rate and the hne 414 dosing rate. The dosing rate again is increased by steps of 0.1 % until the maximum dosing rate of Qhr - 0.1 % (represented by line 416) is reached, or if Pa max is reacned again. The input of powder is again stopped, as evidenced by lines 430 and 436. and dosing is subsequently restaπed at a rate evidenced by line 434. which is slightly less than the line 416 level. Injection of powder may again be terminated, as evidenced by lines 436 and 438, and dosing restarted at the levei evidenceα by line 440. The dosmg rate is again stepped up to level ot line 420. with level of line 420 being less than the level of line 418 by a select amount, e.g., 0.1 %. If Pa is less than Pa max, the dosing rate may then be maintained at this level. If Pa max is reached 4 times, dosmg is stopped. A quantity of water, e.g., 30 cubic meters or water, is then injected, and an alarm is acuvated "o signal the operator It may then be possmle to restart the pumos at a lower f.owrate ano try dosing again. The monitored iection conditions mav used to determine how system operation is maintained according to the Dresent invention. Over an extended penod or time, the constant cosa e rate represented by line 452 in Fig. 8 may result in annulus oressure Pa acmeving the maximum vaiiie. The dosmg rate level represented v une 452 mav be suostantiailv eouai to the optimum level as deπveo aDove. If max pressure Pa is not reacned. then this dosing rate may oe maintained until the required .-.mount of powder is -njected into the wellbore. If the maximum pressure Pa is -eacneo. however, powoer input to the mixing tank 35 may again oe stopped as ewoencec bv line 454 ano water with no powder injected, as evidenced by line 456. Powder mav mereaπer πe miectec -_; a dosmg level represented by line 460, which eι mav oe Qhr divided DV 2. The oosmg rate may therearter be stepped up to the eι or line 462. If rhe maximum pressure Pa is again reached, dosing may again oe stopped and restarted at the level of line 468. which is less than the line 460 If this starting ano stopping ot the dosing operation occurs more than tour within a preset period of time, all dosing is preferably stopped and an alarm sounded to indicate that operator interaction is desire. If dosmg is earned out at a staple Qhr rate tor more man four nours without adjustment, the counter is reset. It s poss le to try oosing again automatically with a lower flowrate. If Pa is reached. " •■ e svste mav thus searcn ror a new dosmg rate tour times, as descπoeo before. The control 33 and 34 are preferably ot the type whicn automaucally i or semiautomaticaily) control the desired or optimum water injection flowrate to the -".ixing ιan s and thus tne injection flowrate to a certain injection well. The control vaives 33 and 34 mav oe conventionally programmed or otherwise controlled to πcrease the flowrate or water (while simultaneously the flowrate of powder is cecreased) if the pressure ot the iniection weil nses above a set vaiue. thereby preventing plugging ot the injection well and optimizing the water flooding operation. Those skilled in the an will appreciate that vanous powoereo water-soluble ceilulose ethers mav oe used tor plugging the established flow channels in the rormatioπ. A list ot suitaole ceilulose ethers is provided in U.S. Patent 3.848,673 assigned to Phillips Petroleum Companv. and inciudes vanous carboxyaivkl cellulose ethers, hydroxyalkyl ethers, hydroxoyalkyl celluloses, and hydroxypropylmethyl celluloses. The concepts of the present invention may also be applied to other gel forming materials, such as those discussed in U.S. Patent 3,707,191. Various modifications to the equipment and to the techniques described herein should be apparent from the above description of a preferred embodiment. Although the invention has thus been described in detail for a specific embodiment, it should be understood that this explanation is for illustration, and that the invention is not limited to this embodiment. Alternative equipment and operating techniques will thus be apparent to those skilled in the an in view of this disclosure. Modifications are thus contemplated and may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention, which is denned bv the claims.

Claims: What is Claimed is: 1. A method of controlling the injection of a powder/water mixture through an injection well and into a formation for recovery of hydrocarbons, the method comprising: (a) determining a desired mixture injection flow rate; (b) selecting an initial dosage rate of powder; (c) mixing the selected initial dosage rate of powder and water to form an initial powder/ water mixture ratio; (d) injecting the powder/water mixture through the injection well and into the formation; (e) monitoring the pressure of the powder/water mixture in the well bore in the vicinity of the formation during step (d); (f) increasing the selected initial dosage rate of powder to increase the powder/water mixture ratio; (g) determining a high dosage rate of powder obtained when the monitored pressure reaches a predetermined limit: and (h) thereafter setting the dosing rate between the initial dosing rate and the high dosing rate for injecting the mixture into the formation. 2. The method as defined in Claim 1, wherein step (c) further comprises: automatically regulating the flowrate of water for mixing with the powder. 3. The method as defined in Claim 1, further comprising: subsequent to step (h), increasing the dosage rate above the set dosage rate; and resetting the dosage rate at a selected dosing rate functionally related to the monitored pressure. 4. The method as defined in Claim 1, further comprising: monitoring the flowrate of the powder/water mixture injected into the formation; and adjusting the set dosing rate as a function of the monitored flowrate of the mixture. 5. The method as defined in Claim 1, wherein step (c) further comprises: mixing the powder and the water in a mixing chamber having an inert gas chamber above the powder/ water mixture; and * injecting an inen gas into the inert gas chamber. 6. The method as defined in Claim 1 , further comprising: increasing the pressure of the powder/water mixture prior to injection of the mixture into the injection well. 7. The method as defined in Claim 1, further comprising: injecting a selected quantity of water into the injection well prior to performing step (d). 8. The method as defined in Claim 1 , wherein step (c) further comprises: mixing the powder and the water in a mixing chamber by inputting water to the mixing chamber tangentially to create a vortex within the mixing chamber; and adding the powder to the mixing chamber adjacent a center of the created vortex. 9. The method as defined in Claim 1, wherein step (c) further comprises: mixing the powder and water in a mixing chamber; and automatically controlling the level of water mixture within the mixing chamber. 10. The metnod as defined in Claim 1. wherein the powder mixed with the '•vater in step (c) is a ceilulose mateπal. 1 1. The metnod as defined in Claim 1. further comprising: generating eiectπcai power adjacent the iniection well for poweπng equipment :o perform steps (b) - (h) inclusive. 12. A system for controlling the injection of a powder/ water mixture Through an injection weil and into a formation for recovery of hydrocarbons, the system compπsing: a mixing tank for mixing a selected initial dosage rate of powαer with water :o form an initial powαer/ water mixture ratio: a pressure sensor for momtonng the pressure of the mixture in tne weil bore; fluid control means for maintaining a desired flowrate of the mixture into the ".r.iection well: a flowmeter for momtonng the flowrate of the mixture injected into the '.niection weil: and dosing control means for automatically increasing the selected initial dosing rate of powder at a rate functionally related to the monitored pressure and the monitored flowrate. 13. The system as defined in Claim 12. further comprising: a hopper for storage of cellulose powder: a conveyor for conveying the cellulose power from the hopper to the mixing tank: and the dosing control means includes a variable speed drive motor for adjusting :he speed of the conveyor. 14. The system as defined in Claim 13. further comprising: a portable tanker for housing cellulose powder; a compressed air source for transporting the cellulose powder from the tanker ro the hopper. 15. The system as defined in Claim 12, further comprising: one or more injection pumps for increasing the fluid pressure of the mixture prior to injection into the injection well. 16. The system as defined in Claim 12, further comprising: one or more filters for filtering the water upstream from the mixing tank. 17. The mixture as defined in Claim 12, further comprising: an inert gas source for providing an inert gas blanket within the mixing tank above the powder/water mixture. 18. The system as defined in Claim 12, further comprising: a tank level transmitter for providing an output signal indicative of the mixture level in the mixing tank. 19. The system as defined in Claim 18, further comprising: a controller responsive to the tank level transmitter for automatically controlling the mixture level within the mixing tank. 20. The system as defined in Claim 12, further comprising: a portable generator trailer for transporting one or more electrical generators and a compressed air source. 21. A system for controlling me mjecπon of a powder/water mixture througn an mjecπon wed ano into a formaπon for recovery of hydrocarbons, the system compπsmg: a portable tanker for storage of cedulose powoer; a portable hopper for nousmg ceduiose powder: a ponaole compressed air source for transporting the cellulose powαer from die tanxer to the nopper; a portable mixing ta x for mixing a selected lmπal dosage rate of powαer with water :o form an lmual powαer/water mixture raπo: a ponaole conveyor for conveying tne cedulose power from the hopper to the mixing tame: a pressure sensor for momtonng tne pressure of the mixture in the wed bore: a flowmeter for momtonng the flowrate of the mixture injected into the mjecπon weil: ano cosing control means for automaucady increasing the selected initial dosing rate of powoer at a rate funcuonady related to d e monitored pressure and the monitored flowrate. the control means including means for adjusting the flowrate of cedulose powαer aiong me conveyor. 22. A method of recovering oil from a hydrocarbon field, which method includes delivering a mixture of a gel-forming material and water downhole so that d e gel-forming material hydrates to form a viscous gel after delivery, and which method further comprises monitoring die back-pressure of the mixture and varying in response thereto the concentration of the gel-forming material in the mixture to vary the viscosity of the gel downhole.

Inventors: PATERSON ALEXANDER JOHN, PATERSON, ALEXANDER, JOHN
Applicants: BAKER HUGHES INC, PATERSON ALEXANDER JOHN, BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, PATERSON, ALEXANDER, JOHN
Application year: 1993
Main classification: E21B33
IPC codes: E21B33, E21B43