Method and control apparatus for self diagnosis

Abstract: In a self diagnosis method and control apparatus for positive self diagnosis of equipment having complicatedly interlaced mechanical portions, equipment under diagnosis is divided into a plurality of areas under diagnosis, each of which is assigned an evaluation variable. Diagnosis is executed in units of diagnostic steps classified for each area under diagnosis. Based on an execution result, points are allotted to the evaluation variable. Based on the evaluation variable, or a sum of allotted points, each area under diagnosis is diagnosed and a diagnostic result is displayed for self diagnosis. Meanwhile, those diagnostic steps which are determined invalid by an execution result of another diagnostic step will not be executed. The equipment under diagnosis includes those which contain mechanical portions.

Description: The present invention relates to a method and a control apparatus for self diagnosis and, more particularly, to a method and a control apparatus for self diagnosis suitable for use in an information processing apparatus such as a data recorder having a mechanical portion. It is known that some information processing, instrumentation, or control apparatus or systems have a self diagnostic capability. US-A-4 931 963 discloses a self-diagnosis apparatus and method for a bank note dispensing machine. Diagnosis data for respective portions of the machine are collected from respective sensors provided at respective portions thereof and stored in a memory for each of the respective operations. These diagnosis data are the amount of change with time and frequency of occurrence of abnormal operation. The amount of change with time is yielded from the number of treatments for a detection object of each sensor, while the frequency of occurrence of abnormal operations is provided as a ratio of the number of abnormal operations detected by the respective sensors to the number of treatments by the particular object or part involved. The resulting diagnosis data is compared with a predetermined reference value, and when the diagnosis data exceeds the reference value, a prediction alarm flag indicative of a prediction of necessary maintenance to prevent trouble from occurring is added to the diagnosis data and stored in the memory. The self diagnostic capability of a data recorder, for example, includes an initial test to be performed when the data recorder is powered on, error indication, alarming, and error data storage in a regular operation, and various tests in a maintenance operation, among others. Self diagnosis as generally referred to points at the diagnostic operations to be performed in the regular run of the apparatus as mentioned above, with emphasis placed on error detection. It sometimes can happen that a some apparatus's functional portion which is used only once in a long while, one year for example, is found defective just before use. With a conventional data recorder, for example, it is a general practice to provide no capability of checking the entire recorder system including its infrequently used functional portion for a failure or no dedicated self diagnostic mode. However, in the field of instrumentation, some of apparatus including an oscilloscope are beginning to employ the capability for self-diagnosing their electric or electronic circuitry. However, there is a limitation with the above-mentioned practice as performed on some instruments is that self diagnosis is adapted to apply only to electric or electronic portion of each instrument. Therefore, the practice cannot apply to any apparatus that contain mechanical portions to be subjected to self diagnosis. Such apparatus include a data recorder comprising a video tape recorder, for example. Unlike an electric or electronic circuit, a mechanical portion of an apparatus cannot be definitely defined in terms of input and output. With the electric or electronic circuit, it is a general practice to enter a test signal in it and observe a resultant output for diagnosis. Mechanically, it is not that simple; diagnosis must often be performed on multiple complicatedly interlaced portions. At a laboratory level, a troubleshooting expert system is under development for inferring from a symptom a failing location based on an artificial intelligence (AI) approach. Implementing such expert system requires the use of a powerful computer system such as a workstation. Such implementation may be unrealistic in terms of cost for the present invention which intends to incorporate the self diagnostic capability in an apparatus. In addition, the construction of an expert system requires a large-scale database on which inference must be made from a symptom as wisely as a human expert. However, it is often difficult to prepare and install such a database on an apparatus under fabrication in which a self diagnostic capability is incorporated. Thus, for the self diagnosis of such apparatus as a data recorder, a system must be constructed which, still supporting a conventional diagnostic capability for error detection, provides a positive troubleshooting capability such as a dedicated self diagnostic mode. Further, the above-mentioned diagnostic system must be able to cope with such a complicated symptomatic situation for diagnosing a mechanical portion of the apparatus as that, while checking portion A, an abnormal condition has been unexpectedly detected in portion B. It is also desirable for the built-in diagnostic system to be implemented by a simple approach rather than complicated one typically supported by AI. The present invention is concerned with providing a simple self diagnostic method which can positively self-diagnose apparatus having complicatedly interlaced mechanical portions, and a controller for implementing the self diagnostic method. In carrying out the invention and according to one aspect thereof, there is provided a self diagnostic method comprising a method of executing a self diagnosis on an apparatus under diagnosis, comprising the steps of: dividing said apparatus under diagnosis into a plurality of areas under diagnosis; each area having an evaluation variable representing its functional operativeness and characterised by, executing the self diagnosis in units of diagnostic steps at least some of said diagnostic steps corresponding to a plurality of said areas under diagnosis; for each diagnostic step, allotting points to the evaluation variable of said area under diagnosis corresponding to the results of the said diagnostic step; determining the total number of points allotted to the evaluation variable; and displaying a state of said apparatus under diagnosis based on the total points allotted to the evaluation variable. When executing a diagnostic operation, it is arranged so that no step determined invalid by an execution result of another diagnostic step will be executed and an apparatus under diagnosis includes apparatus having a mechanical portion. In carrying out the invention and according to another aspect thereof, there is provided a controller 100 as schematically shown in Fig. 13 comprising diagnosis execution control means 110, execution result processing means 120, and diagnostic result display means 130, wherein diagnosis is performed on a specified area 201 of an apparatus under diagnosis divided into multiple areas under diagnosis each provided with an evaluation variable, and a diagnostic result is determined upon receiving an execution result. Actually, as shown in Fig. 13, there is provided, between the controller 100 and the specified area 201, diagnosis executing means for executing diagnosis based on an instruction given by the diagnosis execution control means 110 and detecting the execution result to send it to the execution result processing means 120. However, the description of this diagnosis executing means is omitted herein because its specific configuration and implementation technique do not matter in carrying out the present invention. The diagnosis execution control means 110 has a diagnostic step specification capability 111 and executes diagnosis by specifying a diagnostic step for each area of the apparatus under diagnosis 200 and, further, for each diagnostic mode. In execution, it is arranged so that a determination by an invalid step decision capability 122 in the execution result processing means 120 is referenced not to execute diagnostic step determined invalid by an execution result of another step. The invalid step includes those steps which are determined invalid by sensor reliability data 123 obtained from the execution result of each step carried out by the execution result processing means 120 for example. The execution result processing means 120 has an evaluation variable point allotting capability 121 to allot points to the evaluation variable of an associated area under diagnosis based on the execution result of each step and store a diagnostic result consisting of and integrated value of evaluation variables (124). In this operation, if a step determined invalid by the decision of the invalid step decision capability 122 has already been executed, the evaluation variable point allotting capability 121 subtracts the allotted points from the associated area under diagnosis. The diagnostic result display means 130 displays the diagnostic result obtained by the execution result processing means 120, starting with an area having a greatest evaluation variable. It also has display limit capability 131 for displaying only areas having evaluation variables above a certain level which can be varied. The invention will now be more particularly described, by way of illustrative and non-limiting example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Fig. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an entire configuration of the data recorder; Fig. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an internal configuration of a CPU board 10 of Fig. 1; Fig. 3 illustrates positions of self diagnostic modes; Fig. 4 illustrates an example of how an apparatus under diagnosis is divided into areas under diagnosis; Fig. 5 illustrates how to operate self diagnostic modes; Fig. 6 is an overall flowchart illustrating self diagnostic mode operations; Fig. 7 is a table for determining, from modes and areas under diagnosis, which diagnostic step is to be executed; Fig. 8 is a table in which an execution result of each diagnostic step is entered; Fig. 9 is a table for determining an address of a diagnostic step execution program and an address of a point allotment calculation program from an internal diagnostic step number; Fig. 10 is table in which a grade for each area under diagnosis is stored; Fig. 11 is a table from which a message is obtained according to a message number; Fig. 12 is a table for managing sensor output reliability; and Fig. 13 is a block diagram schematically illustrating the self diagnosis controller. A self diagnosis method and its controller as applied to a data recorder will be described in detail. In Figure 1, each block does not indicate an actual board configuration; it indicates a functional block for self diagnosis, or an area under diagnosis. Reference numeral 1 indicates data input/output interface which provides synchronization in data between a digital signal processor 2 and data I/O 20 and 21 of the data recorder. The digital signal processor 2 performs concurrent processing in four units for example to increase processing speed. Digital data 20 entered is fed through the data input/output interface 1 to the digital signal processor 2 to be added with an error correction code. A resultant signal is fed to an RF-REC (record) system 3 to be recording-compensated for recording by a rotary head 4. In reproduction, this operational flow is reversed; however, instead of the RF-REC 3, an RF-PB (playback) system 5 is used. A CPU board 10 is a CPU functional portion which controls the data recorder in its entirety. An outside remote control signal 24 including a self diagnosis start instruction and an enquiry for a diagnostic result is entered in the CPU board 10 through an interface board 25. A CP 26 is a control panel consisting of a keyboard and a display. A mechanical sensor 12 represents all sensors installed in a tape travel system and a cassette compartment. Many of these sensors are optical sensors based on a pair of a light emitting diode and a phototransistor. A signal coming from the sensor 12 is processed by the CPU board 10 to be fed to a motor driver 11 as a control signal, driving motors and plungers for operating mechanical portions 13 through 19 of the tape travel system and the like shown. Fig. 2 is the block diagram illustrating an internal configuration of the CPU board 10. It contains a main CPU 34 and three sub CPUs; IF CPU 31 for input/output control, PR CPU 32 for signal processing control, and SV CPU 33 for driver control. Controlled by the main CPU 34, each sub CPU in turn controls a corresponding portion to perform a data recorder operation. The main CPU 34 also executes a self diagnostic sequence and contains a self diagnosis controller 38 for that purpose. The main CPU 34 is also provided with a storage unit 36 for storing a self diagnostic result and a data recorder state to be referenced before starting self diagnosis, a backup power supply for the storage unit 36, a reset line controller 41 for hardware-resetting the main CPU itself upon termination of the self diagnosis, and a power-on reset circuit 42 for controlling a reset operation at power-on. In what follows, the self diagnosis method and capabilities necessary for implementing it will be described. First, the position of the self diagnosis mode is described. As shown in Fig. 3 and as described above, the data recorder is provided with various self diagnostic capabilities including an initial test, a regular operation diagnostic capability, a test mode, and the self diagnosis mode positioned as a dedicated self diagnostic mode. The dedicated self diagnostic mode as referred to herein is a capability to be intentionally activated for checking the data recorder for any abnormal conditions. For example, this mode is activated, upon switching on the data recorder for starting a task, to check the data recorder for any trouble or troubleshoot the data recorder when it is found malfunctioning. Once in the self diagnostic mode, no regular operations including data recording/reproducing can be performed. In the self diagnostic mode, the data recorder is divided into multiple areas to be subjected to diagnosis (Fig. 4). The self diagnostic mode comprises following four modes which respectively cover the areas under diagnosis. In mode 1, diagnosis is performed with no tape cassette loaded as with an independent reel rotational test. In mode 2, diagnosis is performed with an electric system calibration tape loaded as with a reproduction of a test signal tape. In mode 3, diagnosis is performed with a mechanical calibration tape loaded as with a tracking test and a head position control test. In mode 4, diagnosis is performed with a blank tape loaded to check whether recording is made normally or not. One or more diagnostic steps (Fig. 9) are allocated as required to each area to be diagnosed in each mode and for execution. It should be noted that the present embodiment can also be constituted so that self diagnosis is performed while a regular operation such as data recording/reproducing operation is in progress. Now, referring to Fig. 4, the data recorder is divided into areas under diagnosis by way of example. To be specific, the data recorder is divided into seven divisions of a signal processing system, an audio signal processing system, a control system, a tape travel system, a tape loading system, a miscellaneous system, and an overall system. Each division is further divided into multiple functional blocks or areas suitable for particular diagnoses. Each area under diagnosis is assigned with an area number. It should be noted that the areas in the miscellaneous division having area numbers on the order of 80 cannot be tested alone and the areas in the overall division having area numbers on the order of 90 have no specific object to be diagnosed. With the areas having numbers on the order of 90, the data recorder is operated in the same manner as a regular operation to make an overall diagnosis based on status variables such as voltages and on errors detected. Operations of the self diagnostic mode and an operational flow of diagnosis will be described as follows. Fig. 5 indicates how to operate the self diagnostic mode, in which the mode is executed following procedures (1) through (8). In procedure (5), a self diagnosis starts. In procedure (6), diagnostic tapes are exchanged for changing modes as instructed by a diagnostic program halfway in its execution. Fig. 6 is an overall flow of the self diagnosis indicating the self diagnostic operations. In what follows, these self diagnostic operations will be described by referring to the overall flow. First, in procedures (1) and (2), preparations necessary for carrying out the self diagnosis are made and desired self diagnostic mode and area under diagnosis are entered through the control panel or a remote control device. At this stage, the entered mode and area are only stored in the storage unit and therefore the mode is not yet active. When the self diagnostic mode is activated according to procedure (4) shown in Fig. 5, the self diagnosis starts following procedures (3) through (5) shown in Fig. 6. Each diagnostic step, in procedure (6), obtains the number of a step to be executed next from a current setting by referring to ROM data in which diagnostic steps to be executed for each mode have been set for each area as shown in Fig. 7. Meanwhile, in procedure (8), contents of RAM in which execution results of diagnostic steps are stored as shown in Fig. 8 are referred to so that, if a specific diagnostic step is found to have already been executed, the step will not be executed, or if a diagnostic step to be executed next based on the result of another diagnostic step is found invalid, the step will not be executed, thereby passing control to a next diagnostic step. Especially, if the output of a sensor is found unreliable by the result of a diagnostic step for example, the execution results of the diagnostic steps associated with the sensor output will subsequently be handled as being unreliable. Consequently, a table listing the reliability data of each sensor is prepared beforehand as shown in Fig. 12. The table is referred to every time a diagnostic step is to be executed to determine whether the step is valid or invalid. When changing a diagnostic mode to another, if a diagnostic tape need be changed to another, a current tape is ejected and a required tape is inserted, a tape exchange event is displayed, and the operational flow is held until the tape has been fully loaded as in procedures (9) and (10). Each step is executed by obtaining an address of a program to be executed from its step number based on the ROM data which specifies the preset execution contents of each step as shown in Fig. 9. If a so-called system error occurs during execution of a diagnostic step, the error will be handled as follows in procedures (12) through (15). The system error is one of the following four types: (1) an error whose occurrence is self evident from the nature of self diagnosis and which may be ignored; (2) an error whose occurrence is expected and its presence or absence is positively used for self diagnosis; (3) an unexpected error which is useful for self diagnosis and allows it to proceed; and (4) an unexpected error which does not allow self diagnosis to proceed. This error handling is performed in each diagnostic step, in which a type of an detected error is determined to perform necessary processing accordingly. That is, the error of type (1) mentioned above is ignored in procedure (13), the error of type (4) causes the diagnosis to terminate in procedure (14), and the errors of types (2) and (3) add up a grade value of an suspected area under diagnosis depending on their contents in procedure (15). The grade (or an evaluation value, also called an evaluation variable herein) as used herein indicates a degree of failure in an associated area under diagnosis. Its value is stored for each area under diagnosis and may take 0 to 255. This value increments in units of 1 to 10 depending on an execution result of each step. As this value increases, it is more probable that the area under diagnosis is failing. When a diagnostic step has terminated in procedure (17), the grade value for an area under diagnosis associated with that diagnostic step is manipulated; that is, point allotment is performed. Points are allotted by a point allotting program preset for each diagnostic step. As shown in Fig. 9, an address of each point allotting program can be referenced in ROM which relates a step number with a diagnosis execution program. For example, if executing a diagnostic step to test area 22 results in a no good condition, the grade of the area 22 is increased by 30 points. If, at this time, area 23 is also suspicious, its grade is increased by 20 points for example. The grade value thus allotted to the area under diagnosis is stored in an execution result table (Fig. 10) to be described, along with information on the diagnostic step executed and diagnostic message. At the same time, whether a diagnostic step has been executed or not and, if executed, its result are entered in the table of Fig. 9 for each diagnostic step. If the execution result indicates that execution of another diagnostic step is meaningless, that step is flagged invalid. If the diagnostic step having an invalid flag has already been executed, it means that its execution will be meaningless, thus requiring to subtract the points allotted to the associated area from its grade value. Some diagnostic steps forcibly change a state in the data recorder for testing. Once changed, it is often difficult to restore the original state even if the state is in memory. Therefore, if this happens, a hardware reset operation is executed in procedure (18). When specified diagnostic steps have all been executed or if it is determined that a fatal error detected in procedure (14) has made impossible the continuation of the diagnosis, the diagnosis is terminated (refer to (*1) in Fig. 6). The diagnostic result is stored in the RAM as a grade value for each area under diagnosis as shown in Fig. 10; that is, points to be allotted as results of the execution of diagnostic steps are added up in the RAM. At the same time, a number of a diagnostic step determined failing and an associated diagnostic message are stored (steps & messages). For example, as shown in Fig. 11, all messages stored in the ROM beforehand are assigned with numbers which are stored in the RAM of Fig. 10. In Fig. 10, "1-100" indicates that step 1 is no good and message 100 must be referred to, "3-0" indicates that step 3 is no good and there is no message to be referred to, and so on. Now, when the diagnosis has been completed, the result is displayed on the control panel starting with an area under diagnosis having a highest grade value, in a form "area xx is suspicious of failing," in procedure (20). In addition to this message, a special message informing a service engineer of the reason of failure determination may be displayed for each diagnostic step, for example. It should be noted here that, as a general rule, no area under diagnosis having less than 16 points will be displayed. This is because, if areas under diagnosis slightly suspicious of failing are displayed in large quantities, practicality of the self diagnosis would be lost. However, the grade or the number of points may be lowered from 16 if a service engineer for example requires more detail failure information. If an attempt is made to execute a test of the same mode twice, it is judged that a retry of the test is requested, automatically erasing previous data. The previous data may also be manually erased by an operator. Data structures, or tables, to be referred to during execution of the above-mentioned diagnostic program will be described as follows. These tables contain two types of data; predefined data stored in the ROM and data stored in the RAM as a result of diagnostic execution. A table of Fig. 7 is used to determine which step is to be executed based on a mode and an area under diagnosis specified on the control panel. This table is written in the ROM of the main CPU 34 beforehand. Each diagnostic step is represented in an internal step number uniquely set in the data recorder. In the table, a number or numbers indicated for each area under diagnosis are step numbers. For example, when all steps of area 11 are be checked, steps 1, 3, and 4 are executed (*1); when all steps of mode 1 are to be checked, steps 1, 2, 7, and 8 are executed (*2). Fig. 8 is a table in which an execution result of each diagnostic step is entered. This table is created in the RAM of the main CPU 34. Entries in this table include, for each diagnostic step, whether the step has been executed or not, a result of execution, and whether the result is invalid or valid. In the table, (a) indicates whether the step has been executed or not and is 1 if executed; (b) indicates the execution result and is O if found good; and (c) indicates that the execution result of the step is found invalid by another step, and is the number of the invalid step. Fig. 9 is a table for obtaining an address of a step execution program from the internal step number and an address of a grade calculation program from a step execution result. This table is also written in the ROM beforehand. In the table, "Execution program address" column contains a start address of an execution program corresponding to a specified diagnostic step and "Point allotment program address" column contains an address of the point allotment program for recalculating the grade of the diagnostic step from a result of a subsequent diagnostic step. "Content description character string" column contains information to be used when displaying the content of the specified diagnostic step on the control panel. Fig. 10 is a table to store a grade for each area under diagnosis and is stored in the RAM. In addition to the grade, this table stores an internal number of a diagnostic step which manipulated the grade and an internal number of a message given by the step. In the figure, (X) indicates an area under diagnosis for which a program is executed as a main target; (Y) indicates an area under diagnosis circumstantially suspected of failure from a program execution result; and (Z) indicates an area under diagnosis for which an overall diagnosis is performed without specifying a particular location. It should be noted that the (Z) area under diagnosis indicates no particular area under diagnosis and therefore has no grade value. "Steps & messages" column contains the number of a failed step and a storage number (refer to Fig. 11) of an associated message. For example, "1-100" means that step 1 is no good and message number 100 must be referred to for description; "3-0" means that step 3 is no good and there is no corresponding message. Fig. 11 is a table for obtaining a message from a message number and is also stored in the ROM beforehand. Fig. 12 is a table for managing sensor output reliability. If a result of a diagnostic step indicates that an output of a sensor is not reliable, reliability "1" is recorded for the sensor. This table is referenced by each diagnostic step to determine whether its execution result is valid or invalid. As described, actions necessary for self diagnosis are taken automatically in general, realizing faster and more accurate self diagnosis than prior-art techniques. A self diagnosis is performed by selecting from multiple diagnostic steps necessary ones. More steps executed will result in a more accurate result. If required, only a minimal number of steps may be executed for a meaningful result. If an execution result of each diagnostic step indicates two or more suspicious areas under diagnosis, the result can be used for evaluating such areas by manipulating their grade values. If an error has been detected during the execution of a diagnosis, manipulating the grade values of multiple associated areas under diagnosis allows to positively use the error for the diagnosis. Further, a failure which cannot be located by a single test can be checked by using circumstantial evidence obtained by other diagnostic steps without resorting to complex inference. In addition, introduction of grade values for evaluation allows to use a test which puts out a vague result.

Claims: A method of executing a self diagnosis on an apparatus under diagnosis, comprising the steps of: (a) dividing said apparatus under diagnosis into a plurality of areas (201) under diagnosis; each area having an evaluation variable representing its functional operativeness and characterised by, (b) executing (11) the self diagnosis in units of diagnostic steps at least some of said diagnostic steps corresponding to a plurality of said areas under diagnosis; (c1) for each diagnostic step, allotting (120) points to the evaluation variable of said area under diagnosis corresponding to the results of the said diagnostic step; (c2) determining the total number of points allotted to the evaluation variable; and (d) displaying (130) a state of said apparatus under diagnosis based on the total points allotted to the evaluation variable. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein said diagnostic step (b) comprises the steps of: (b-1) determining whether a diagnostic step to be executed is valid by referring to memory which stores information about validity of said diagnostic step; (b-2) executing said diagnostic step if found valid; (b-3) determining whether other diagnostic steps are valid based on an execution result of said diagnostic step; and (b-4) storing, if there is a diagnostic step found invalid, information about invalidness in said memory. A method as defined in claim 2, wherein said diagnostic step (b) further comprising the step of: (b-4) subtracting points allotted as a result of execution of an invalid diagnostic step from each evaluation variable if said invalid diagnostic step has already been executed. A method as defined in any preceding claim, wherein said diagnostic step (d) comprising the step of: (d-1) displaying said areas under diagnosis, starting with one having a greatest evaluation variable sequentially followed by others having smaller evaluation variables. A method as defined in claim 4, wherein in said diagnostic step (d-1) only areas having evaluation variables higher than a predetermined value are displayed. A self diagnosis control apparatus which divides an apparatus under diagnosis into a plurality of areas (201) under diagnosis, each provided with an evaluation variable for performing a diagnosis in units of said area under diagnosis, characterised by: (1) self diagnosis execution control means (10) for executing the diagnosis based on diagnostic steps, at least some of said diagnostic steps corresponding to a plurality of said areas under diagnosis; (2) execution result processing means (120) for allotting points to the evaluation variable of the said area under diagnosis corresponding to the results of each step and for adding up the points allotted to said evaluation variable; and (3) display means (130) for displaying a state of said apparatus under diagnosis based the total points allotted to said evaluation variable for each of said areas under diagnosis. A self diagnosis control apparatus as defined in claim 6, including: (4) specification means (111) for specifying said areas under diagnosis. A self diagnosis control apparatus as defined in claim 7, wherein said diagnosis execution control means (110) has a first storage means (111) for storing said diagnostic steps corresponding to each of said areas under diagnosis from which specified diagnostic steps are read for execution. A self diagnosis control apparatus as defined in claim 8, wherein said first storage means (111) stores said diagnostic steps for each of said areas under diagnosis for a plurality of self diagnostic modes. A self diagnosis control apparatus as defined in claim 9, wherein said specification means specifies said self diagnostic modes. A self diagnosis control apparatus as defined in any of claims 6 to 10, wherein said diagnosis execution control means (110) has a second storage means for storing a processing program for each of said diagnostic steps. A self diagnosis control apparatus as defined in any of claims 6 to 11, wherein said diagnosis execution control means has (110) a storage means for storing information which tells whether any of said diagnostic steps has been executed. A self diagnosis control apparatus as defined in any of claims 6 to 12, wherein said execution result processing means (120) controls detecting means for detecting whether there is any diagnostic step that is determined by another diagnostic step to be invalid based on its diagnostic result and said diagnosis execution control means (110) so that no diagnostic step determined invalid based on a detection result is to be executed. A self diagnosis control apparatus as defined in claim 13, wherein, if an already executed diagnostic step is determined invalid based on said detection result, no point allotted by said invalid step is added to said evaluation variable. A self diagnostic control apparatus as defined in any of claims 6 to 14, wherein said display means (130) displays said areas under diagnosis, starting with one having a greatest evaluation variable sequentially followed by others having smaller evaluation variables. A self diagnosis control apparatus as defined in claim 15, wherein said display means (130) displays only those of said areas under diagnosis whose evaluation variables are greater than a predetermined value. A self diagnosis control apparatus as defined in claim 16, wherein said predetermined value is variable.

Inventors: MORITA SHINYA, MORITA, SHINYA, Morita, Shinya, c/o Intellectual Property Div.
Applicants: SONY CORP, SONY CORPORATION
Application year: 1993
Main classification: G05B19
IPC codes: G11B20, G05B19, G11B27, G11B33, G01D21, G11B19, G11B15