Process control with graphical attribute interface

Abstract: Process attributes such as, for example, the identification of process elements, the characteristics of process elements, and the states of the variables produced by the process elements, are displayed substantially simultaneous with a graphical representation of a process under control. After displaying a graphical representation (P&ID) of a process being controlled (the graphical representation including icon representations of process elements), a user selects a portion of the graphical representation for which the underlying process attributes (202, 203) are to be displayed. This selection may be accomplished by selecting an icon image of a process element (112 - 118) for which the attributes are to be displayed. After selection, the underlying attributes (202, 203) are displayed substantially simultaneously with the display of the graphical representation, for example, by overlaying a dialogue box (201) on top of the graphical representation containing indicia of the underlying attributes. The attributes (202, 203) that are included in the dialogue box may be entered manually, or may be generated automatically by use of a historical data base (601), or may be created through any combination of manual entry or automatic generation.

Description: The present invention relates to a computer-based process controller, and more particularly to a method of graphical display of selected process attributes and a system for formatting and displaying attribute data. The article by F. Knopp et al in Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift, Vol. 109, Nr. 12, June 1988, Berlin, discloses an interface for control of power supply grids making use of a window technique. Various segments of the grid in different hierarchies can be displayed, wherein a particular object on the display can be selected and the condition thereof displayed in a dialog window. A typical attribute displayed there comprises for example the parameters of a transformer currently in operation. The article makes no reference to storing historical data on the object attributes. The European patent application EP-A-0 483 035 relates to a rework station used in an assembly line for producing computer cards having various electric components. The rework apparatus comprises means for storing and retrieving parameter information on the components including information on possible defects thereof. Display means are provided for displaying a graphical representation of the card assembly currently under diagnosis. Memory means are also provided containing the results of previous tests for the components as well as the previous history of repair actions taken with respect to given components. Processing plants typically include a series of operations in which liquid, gas and solid materials are transported, heated, mixed, chemically treated, cooled, pressurized or otherwise processed. Each of the operations in a processing plant are monitored and controlled to ensure that each is performed according to some predetermined specification or criteria. The monitoring and control typically requires instrumentation including sensors for various process conditions, transmitters for transmitting the sensed data to a computer-based controller, a computer-based controller that receives the transmitted sensed data and that takes appropriate control action based on the sensed data, and controlled elements within the process such as valves, pumps, conveyors, heating or cooling elements, alarms, and the like, which are connected to and controlled by the process controller in order to maintain the sensed process conditions within predetermined desired limits to thereby control the operation of interest. Typical processing plants, such as oil refineries, petrochemical plants, food processing plants, or drug processing plants, may include operations that have tens or hundreds of such so-called "loops", each of which may contain any type of sensor and transmitter, the computer-based controller, and any type of controlled element. Such loop-based operations are typically represented by loop drawings or loop sheets which graphically illustrate the loop or loops of the operation of interest. With the advent of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) programs, loop drawings are created and stored in a computer memory, and are displayed on a display screen, thus simplifying the creation and maintenance of loop sheets. With such CAD programs, creation of the loop sheets is accomplished by an operator instructing the computer, using a digitizer or mouse, to place and connect graphical representations of the components of the operation on the display screen of the computer-based controller. Such CAD programs and computer-based process controllers also facilitate the maintenance of historical data related to the operation under control. Such data historians operate much like flight recorders on aircraft, and serve to record a history of the states and other attributes of all control elements in an operation. The maintenance of such historical data has proven particularly critical when the operation being controlled relates to the manufacture of foods and/or drugs. Typical data historians simply keep track of all attributes of all components of the operation under control, and maintain the data history in a large history data base. Then, when review of the history data base is desired, for example, after the detection of a process upset or other error, the history data base is output in the form of a spread sheet, thus permitting a system operator to analyze the historical data to determine the cause of the upset or error. During such an analysis, an operator reviews the spread sheet of historical data, in combination with a loop sheet drawing, to render conclusions, for example, as to the cause of the upset or other error. Such analyses have proven difficult because large portions of the history data base may not be relevant to the particular loop or process upset under consideration. In addition, correlating the data history with a loop sheet of interest to determine the history of a particular component of the operation of interest, often proves time consuming and occasionally results in errors. There is therefore a need to provide an easier method to correlate data history with individual components in a computer-based process controller. According to the present invention, a method and a system of displaying attribute data are provided as defined in claims 1 and 5, respectively. The display of the process attributes may take the form of a dialogue box which is overlaid on top of the graphical representation of the process being controlled thus permitting the substantially simultaneous display of the graphical representation and underlying process attributes. The process attributes that may be displayed may be virtually any attribute that is associated with a process element. For example, process attributes may include the identity of the process element including its part number, drawing number, manufacturer, and the like, the characteristics of the process element including, for example, the physical and electrical characteristics including the engineering units and range of the output signal produced by the process elements, and the state history of the process element, for example, the state of the output of a process element for a particular point in time. Attributes that may be displayed in accordance with the present invention include static attributes and dynamic attributes. Static attributes (for example, element identity and characteristics) may be entered manually, whereas dynamic characteristics (for example, output state) may be derived from a historical data base, and formatted for inclusion among the attributes to be displayed. These and other advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in this art with reference to the figures and following detailed description of embodiments. Figure 1 is an example of a graphical display of a process and instrumentation diagram. Figure 2 is an example of a graphical display of a loop sheet with a graphical attribute interface, in accordance with the embodiment. Figures 3-5 are additional examples of graphical attribute interfaces, in accordance with the embodiment. Figure 6 is a system block diagram showing the functional requirements for implementing the graphical attribute interface which is used by the embodiment. Figure 7 is a flow chart showing the logic of the graphical attribute interface of the embodiment. Figure 8 is a flow chart showing in more detail the process user request function of Figure 7. Figure 9 is a flow chart showing in more detail the load drawing function of Figure 8. Figure 10 is a flow chart showing in more detail the unload drawing function of Figure 8. Referring to Figure 1, there is shown a screen from a computer display 90 which illustrates a loop sheet in the form of a process and instrumentation diagram (P&ID), for a batch kettle control. In Figure 1, the bold lines indicate pipes or conduits for liquid, steam or vapor, the fine lines indicate hardware connections, and the fine lines with circles indicate software connections. The screen display of Figure 1 shows kettle 100 surrounded by steam jacket 101, which is connected to steam line 102, cooling water supply line 103, condensate return line 104, and cooling water return 106. The input of unprocessed product is illustrated by use of charge header line 107, and processed product is removed for storage via outflow line 108. Also illustrated is vapor recovery line 109. Within kettle 100 is illustrated stir bar 111 which is driven by motor 112. Also within kettle 100 is temperature sensor 113. Illustrated in the P&ID of Figure 1 are several process operation components illustrated using standard process instrumentation symbols. For example, lines 102, 103, 104, 106, 107 and 108 each respectively include valves 112, 113, 114, 116, 117 and 118. Each valve has associated therewith a valve state indicator (YV) and a valve indicator and controller (YIC). For example, outflow line 108 includes outflow valve 118 which has associated therewith a valve state indicator (YV) 119, and a valve indicator and controller (YIC) 120. Vapor recovery line 109 includes a flow transducer 121 which is connected through flow transmitter (FT) 122 to flow rate indicator and controller (FIC) 123. Temperature indicator 113 is connected through temperature transmitter (TT) 126 to temperature indicator and controller (TIC) 127. Also provided to TIC 127 is the control output of valve indicator and controller (YIC) 128, which is connected to monitor motor 112. Finally, the software control outputs of FIC 123 and TIC 127 are applied to temperature converting relay (TY) 129 which is illustrated as controlling valve 131 within steam line 102. Associated with each component illustrated in the P&ID of Figure 1, for example, associated with each valve, valve state indicator (YV), indicator and controller (YIC), sensed signal transmitter (TT, FT), and flow or temperature indicator and controller (FIC, TIC), are so-called process attributes which completely define the identity and state of the particular component. In other words, associated with each graphical or icon representation of a control element in a P&ID such as that illustrated in Figure 1, are one or more process attributes. For example, process attributes may include the name of the control element, the type, part number, and manufacturer of the control element, reference to the drawing for the control element, if the control element is a physical element, the type of signal output by the control element (for example, analog or digital), the engineering units for the signal or signals produced by the control element as well as the range for the output signal, the high and low alarm limits for the output signal, the value of the output signal at a particular point in time, the last time the control element was maintained, and so forth. There are virtually an infinite number of different types of process attributes for the possible control elements used in processing plants. In general, the process attributes reveal the identity, characteristics and/or state of a respective control element. Rather than requiring a control system designer or processing plant operator to search through an extensive history data base to determine the particular process attributes for the control element or elements of interest, the present invention allows selected process attributes to be formatted and displayed along with the graphical representation of the operation (for example, the P&ID sheet of the operation under consideration). By using a user positionable cursor or cross-hair, a user may select a desired control element for which the underlying process attributes are to be displayed. For example, and with reference to Figure 2, an embodiment of the present invention contemplates the use of a cursor (such as cross-hairs 200) which is selectively placeable anywhere on the image of the P&ID sheet by use of a mouse, key board, joy stick, or other user input device, in order to select a particular control element of interest (for example, FT 122). Once a desired control element has been selected, a dialogue box 201 is displayed overlying the graphical representation of the P&ID sheet. Dialogue box 201 may take any form, however, in the preferred embodiment, dialogue box 201 includes at least two fields; a process attribute identity field 202 and a process attribute value field 203. Identity field 202 includes a brief description of the identity of the process attribute of interest, the value for which is displayed in the relevant entry of process attribute value field 203. Dialogue box 201 also includes graphical instruction boxes 204 and 205 with which the user may change or set attribute values by selecting an attribute value field 203 and entering a new value. Once changes have been made to values within field 203, selecting box 204 ("OK") saves the new values or selecting box 205 ("CANCEL") retains the original values. In any case, selecting box 204 then box 205 closes the dialogue box 201. Figures 3,4 and 5 present examples of different types of dialogue boxes 201 which are illustrative of dialogue boxes that may be displayed for various control elements revealed in the P&ID sheet of Figure 1. It should be understood that for each dialogue box illustrated in Figures 3, 4 and 5, more or fewer process attribute identifiers may be included within the process attribute identification field, which would result in more or fewer process attribute values being displayed in the process attribute value fields. Referring specifically to Figure 3, presented is an exemplary dialogue box 201A which may be overlaid on the P&ID sheet of Figure 1 (as illustrated in Figure 2), if the flow transmitter (FT) 122 was selected by the user for display of underlying attributes. In dialogue box 201A, process attribute identification field 202A includes a "tag" entry, with the corresponding value in field 203A being the tag that appears on the P&ID sheet for FT 122. Other attribute identifiers and values appearing in fields 202A and 203A indicate that FT 122 produces an output signal that is analog. The "device" and "address" entries in fields 202A and 203A indicate the hardware box actually housing the transmitter, and the address within that box. Finally, attribute identification and value fields 202A and 203A include entries for the engineering units of the output signal of FT 122 (ma), and the high and low values permitted for the output signal, in the specified engineering units. Referring now to dialogue box 201B in Figure 4, presented is an exemplary dialogue box which may be displayed when the user selects product outflow valve 118 of the P&ID sheet of Figure 1 for display of underlying attributes. Process attribute identification and value fields 202B and 203B include entries that identify the name, type, part number and manufacturer of the valve in interest. In addition, the identification of the valve specification sheet is provided. Finally, fields 202B and 203B include entries for the last maintenance date for outflow valve 118. The dialogue boxes 201A and 201B shown in Figures 3 and 4 do not include process attributes that vary as the process proceeds. In other words, the process attributes are static rather than dynamic. The "Maintenance Date" entry in dialogue box 201B is periodically updated when the outflow 118 is maintained, but the other entries in dialogue box 201B do not vary as the process continues. In contrast, other control elements, including control elements presented in icon form in the P&ID sheet of Figure 1, do include process attributes that vary with time (i.e., dynamic attributes). For example, flow rate indicator and controller 123 produces an output signal which is indicative of the vapor flow rate detected by flow sensor 121 and transmitted by flow transmitter 122. Figure 5 presents an exemplary dialogue box 201C for flow rate indicator and controller 123. Similar to dialogue boxes 201A and 201B of Figures 3 and 4, dialogue box 201C for flow indicator and controller 123 reveals several process attributes that do not vary as the process proceeds. However, dialogue box 201C includes a process attribute identified as "Process Variable" with a corresponding value. This value (in units of gallons per minute) varies in proportion to the flow of vapor in line 109 as sensed by flow sensor 121 and as transmitted by flow transmitter 122, and will thus vary as the process under control proceeds. In a similar fashion, although the "Set Point", "High Alarm", and "Low Alarm" entries in dialogue box 201C are typically fixed throughout the duration of a control process, these values may either be changed by the operator or may be changed automatically under software control at any time. As explained earlier, a data historian maintains values for these process attributes in a history data base in a known manner. The present invention operates to select and format particular process attributes for presentation in dialogue boxes which are overlaid upon the display of the loop sheet or P&ID sheet of interest. This provides a graphical display of process attributes for any point in time that is recorded in the history data base. Referring now to Figure 6, there is shown in functional block diagram form the graphical display of process attributes. The key parts of the embodiment are an AutoCAD drawing file 601, a data historian or historical data file 602, a mask file 603, and a processor 604 which processes user requests input through interface 606 to produce drawings including graphical representation of process attributes. These drawings are stored in AutoCAD drawing file 601, and are constructed from the AutoCAD drawing file 601, historical data file 602, and mask file 603, as described in more detail below. Drawing data file 607 is used to store a representation of the process attributes refined by mask file 603. Historical data file 602 contains attribute data which is to be loaded into the drawing. The data is organized by records, and each record contains a number of fields as defined by the mask file 603. The mask file 603 contains the definition of the structure records in the historical data file 602. The record definition is the list of attributes in each record in the historical data file. Attributes in the record which are proceeded by a special marking character (for example, a "@" character) are used as the key attributes for loading data from the historical data file 602. The preferred embodiment uses the interface provided in the AutoCAD Development System provided as part of AutoCAD release 11, and provides a mechanism for keeping process documentation up to date with the process itself. A user may to load and unload the process data directly into and out of process drawings. The preferred embodiment is designed to operate on the Fisher Controls ENVOX Open Database product, however, those of skill in this art will be able to apply the invention to other spread sheet and data base applications without undue experimentation. The embodiment uses the concept of "key attributes" which refers to the process attribute within a block of attributes whose value - the "key value" - designates the block for use in a drawing function, whether a load or an unload drawing function (described in detail with reference to Figures 9 and 10). Referring now to Figure 7-10, presented is a flow chart of the logic of the graphical attribute interface implemented in software. One of ordinary skill in the art may write source code from this flow chart in any suitable computer program language, such as Pascal, C, or FORTRAN for any desired computer system, such as IBM PC's or IBM compatible computers or other computers which support these computer languages. The process begins by initializing the users interface in step 1. This is done in accordance with the standard AutoCAD Development System interface procedures. Control then passes to step 2 where user input is awaited. Once user input is received, control passes to step 3 where the user request is processed. Step 3 uses as inputs, the historical data file 602, the mask file 603, the AutoCAD drawing file 601, and/or process attribute data from the drawing 607. Figure 8 shows in more detail the processing of the process user request (step 3) of Figure 7. Beginning in step 3.1, the function code of the entered request is determined, and control passes either to the load drawing function 3.2 or the unload drawing function 3.3, which are described in more detail with reference to Figures 9 and 10. After either the load drawing function 3.2 or unload drawing function 3.3 is completed, control passes to block 3.4 where drawing clean up is performed including, for example, releasing memory allocated for data structures and closing open files. Processing then ends. Referring now to Figure 9, the load drawing function 3.2 of Figure 8 is described in more detail. Beginning in block 3.2.1, the mask file 603 is parsed. In other words, the mask file 603 is read and a structure is created from the mask file that defines the meaning of each item of data in historical data file 602. Control then passes to block 3.2.2 where the historical data file 602 is parsed according to the information contained within mask file 603. Control then passes to block 3.2.3 where the updating of dialogue boxes included in the AutoCAD drawing file 601 is begun. In block 3.2.3, the first dialogue box to be updated is determined from information in the mask file 603, historical data file 602 and AutoCAD drawing file 601. Control then passes to block 3.2.4 where the attribute data for the dialogue box under consideration is found in the historical data file. Control then passes to 3.2.5 where the dialogue box is updated. Control then loops back to block 3.2.3 for continued operation, until no additional dialogue box entities are discovered. Control then passes to block 3.2.6 where the AutoCAD drawing is regenerated and displayed. Turning now to figure 10, the unload drawing function 3.3 of figure 8 is described in more detail. Beginning in block 3.3.1, the mask file is parsed to establish the format of data to be output from AutoCAD drawing file 601 to the data from drawing file 607, and control passes to 3.3.2 where the data from drawing file 607 is opened. Then, in block 3.3.3, the AutoCAD drawing is reviewed in accordance with the parsed mask file data to identify each dialogue box. For each identified dialogue box, control then passes to block 3.3.4 where an output record is built from the dialogue box identified in block 3.3.3. Looping control continues in blocks 3.3.3 and 3.3.4 until no more dialogue boxes are found in AutoCAD drawing 601. Control then passes to block 3.3.5 where the output record is saved, in accordance with the parsed mask file 603, in the data from drawing file 607 established in block 3.3.2.

Claims: A method of generating graphical display of process attributes in a computer-based process controller, comprising: displaying a graphical representation (P&ID) of a process being controlled; storing in a historical data file (602) a history of underlying process attributes (203) for a plurality of points in time during the operation of a process being controlled; storing in a mask data file (603) information relating said history of underlying process attributes (203) to corresponding process elements (112 - 118) in said graphical representation; selecting a portion of the graphical representation (P&ID) and a point in time for which underlying process attributes (203) from said history are to be displayed; and displaying said underlying process attributes (203) of the selected portion of the graphical representation (P&ID) for the selected point in time substantially simultaneously with the display of said graphical representation. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of displaying said process attributes (203) comprises, overlaying indicia (201) of said process attributes over said graphical representation. The method of claim 1 or 2, said graphical representation comprising icons (119 - 129) of process elements (112 - 118), said step of selecting a portion of the graphical representation comprising, selecting an icon of a process element for which underlying process attributes (202, 203) are to be displayed. The method of claim 3, wherein said underlying process attributes include an identification (202B) of a corresponding process element, characteristics (203B) of said corresponding process element, and states (203C) of said corresponding process element. A system for formatting and displaying process attribute data with graphical process data, comprising: a drawing file (601) including at least one graphical representation (P&ID) of a process being controlled, said at least one drawing including a plurality of process elements (112 - 118); a historical data file (602) in which is stored historical data related to process attributes (202, 203) underlying each of said plurality of process elements (112 - 118) for a plurality of points in time; a mask data file (603) including information which relates said historical data to corresponding process elements (112 - 118) in said at least one graphical representation; and a data processor (604), operatively connected to said drawing file (601), historical data file (602) and mask file (603), for combining said at least one graphical representation (P&ID) with said historical data according to said information in said mask file (603), to produce a combined display of said of at least one graphical representation with process attributes (202, 203) underlying at least one of said plurality of process components (112 - 118) for a selected point in time.

Inventors: RILEY KENNETH P, RILEY, KENNETH P.
Applicants: FISHER ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS INC, FISHER-ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC.
Application year: 1993
Main classification: G05B23
IPC codes: G05B23, G06F3