Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) mutant and pharmaceutical composition containing such a mutant

Abstract: This invention provides cold adapted mutant RSV, specifically, mutant RSV of subgroup A and B. Nucleic acid molecules encoding the mutant RSV of this invention, and immunogenic polypeptides of these mutant RSV also are provided by this invention. Pharmaceutical compositions containing any of the above compositions are provided herein. These are especially useful as vaccines. Further provided by this invention are methods of vaccinating a subject against RSV infection using the pharmaceutical compositions described herein.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Throughout this application, various references are referred to in parenthesis to more fully describe the state of the art to which this invention pertains. Full bibliographic information for each citation is found at the end of the specification, immediately preceding the claims. This invention relates to temperature sensitive cold adapted mutant respiratory syncytial virus. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a member of the paramyxovirus family, is the leading cause of viral pneumonia and bronchiolitis in infants and young children and is responsible for an estimated 95,000 hospitalizations and 4,500 deaths per year in the United States (IOM report, 1985; Hall and McBride, 1991; McIntosh and Chanock, 1990). Serious disease is most prevalent in infants 6 weeks to 6 months of age and in children with certain underlying illnesses (e.g. immunodeficiencies, congenital heart disease and bronchopulmonary dysplasia). Two major subgroups of RSV have been identified, A and B, as well as antigenic variants within each subgroup (Anderson et al, 1985; Mufson et al, 1985). Multiple variants of each subgroup have been found to cocirculate in epidemics which occur annually during late fall, winter, and spring months (Anderson et al, 1991). Most children are infected by 2 years of age. Complete immunity to RSV does not develop and reinfections occur throughout life (Henderson et al, 1979; Hall et al, 1991). Most infections are symptomatic and are generally confined to mild upper respiratory tract disease. A decrease in severity of disease is associated with two or more prior infections and, in some studies, with high levels of serum antibody, suggesting that protective immunity to RSV disease will accumulate following repeated infections (Lamprecht et al, 1976; Henderson et al, 1979; Glezen et al, 1981; Glezen et al, 1986; Kasel et al, 1987/88; Hall et al, 1991). There is also evidence that children infected with one of the two major RSV subgroups may be somewhat protected against reinfection with the homologous subgroup (Mufson et al, 1987). These observations suggest that it is both possible and worthwhile to develop an RSV vaccination regimen for infants and young children which would provide sufficient temporary immunity to protect against severe disease and death. Early attempts (1966) to vaccinate young children used a parenterally administered formalin-inactivated RSV vaccine. Unfortunately, administration of this vaccine in several field trials was shown to be specifically associated with the development of a significantly exacerbated illness following subsequent natural infection with RSV (Kapikian et al, 1969; Kim et al, 1969; Fulginiti et al, 1969; Chin et al; 1969). The reasons why this vaccine enhanced RSV disease are not clear. It has been suggested that this exposure to RSV antigen elicited an abnormal or unbalanced immune response which led to an immunopathological potentiation of natural disease (Kim et al, 1976; Prince et al, 1986). Following the lack of success with the formalin-inactivated vaccine, emphasis was placed on the development of live attenuated RSV vaccines. Vaccine candidates developed by cold adaptation were reduced in virulence in seropositive adults, however, one vaccine tested in seronegative infants was found to be under-attenuated (Kim et al, 1971; Forsyth and Phillips, 1973). RSV temperature sensitive (TS) mutants derived by chemical mutagenesis (Gharpure et al, 1969) were attenuated in rodent and non-human primate models (Wright et al, 1970; Richardson et al, 1978). Two mutants which initially appeared promising were found to be over- or under- attenuated in seronegative infants and to lack genetic stability (Kim et al, 1973; Hodes et al, 1974; McIntosh et al, 1974; Wright et al, 1976; Wright et al, 1982). Another vaccination approach using parenteral administration of live virus was found to lack efficacy and efforts along this line were discontinued (Belshe et al, 1982). Notably, these live RSV vaccines were never associated with disease enhancement as was the formalin-inactivated RSV vaccine. Current RSV vaccine development efforts continue for both the live virus and subunit approaches. Because of previous experience with the formalin-inactivated RSV vaccine, trials of vaccines composed of non-replicating viral antigens have proceeded very cautiously. Only one subunit vaccine, purified F protein (PFP, Lederle-Praxis Biologicals) is currently in clinical trials. Studies in seropositive children have thus far given no indication of enhancement of natural disease. Other subunit vaccines in development include baculovirus produced chimeric FG protein (Brideau et al, 1989 [Upjohn]; Wathen et al, 1991 [Upjohn]) and peptides from F and G proteins (Trudel et al, 1991a,b). Vaccine approaches using live-attenuated RSV TS mutants (McKay et al, 1988; Watt et al, 1990) and recombinant vaccinia and adenoviruses expressing RSV F and G proteins (Olmstead et al, 1988; Collins et al, 1990a,b) are also being investigated. Use of a live-attenuated or live-vectored virus vaccine has several advantages over subunit or inactivated virus vaccines. An intranasally administered replicating virus will elicit systemic immunity. In addition, it is more likely than a parenterally administered subunit or inactivated vaccine to give a solid local mucosal immunity comprising both humoral and cellular components. This immunity may confer satisfactory protection from lower respiratory illness, as well as avoiding complications which could lead to enhanced disease. Cold adaptation, a process by which virus is adapted to growth at temperatures colder than those at which it normally optimally grows, has been used to develop attenuated TS virus mutants for use as vaccines (for review see Maassab and DeBorde, 1985). This method generally results in the accumulation of multiple genetic lesions, unlike chemical mutagenesis in which the genetic lesions are usually single. These multiple lesions may help to confer phenotypic stability by reducing the probability that reversion of any one lesion will result in reversion of the relevant phenotype. Maassab has used stepwise cold adaptation to successfully develop several TS influenza vaccine candidates currently in clinical trials (Maassab et al, 1990; Obrosova-Serova et al, 1990; Edwards et al, 1991). These mutants, which bear attenuating mutations in at least four different genes, appear to be attenuated, immunogenic, and phenotypically stable. Belshe and co-workers have used cold adaptation to develop attenuated, TS strains of a paramyxovirus, parainfluenza virus type 3 (Belshe and Hissom, 1982; Murphy et al, 1990). In this case, cold adaptation was carried out in primary African green monkey kidney cells by reducing temperatures to 20°C. Analysis of several virus variants cloned from this cold adapted population demonstrated that the level of attenuation and temperature sensitivity increased as the length of cold adaptation increased. These variants were shown to have reduced potential for virulence in humans, however the temperature sensitive phenotype was somewhat unstable in clinical trials (Clements et al, 1991). RSV was successfully cold adapted to 25-26°C in several laboratories in the mid 1960's, but was found to be under-attenuated in vaccine trials (Kim et al, 1971; Maassab and DeBorde, 1985; Forsyth and Phillips, 1973 (Lederle)). Maassab and DeBorde (1985) have suggested this may be because cold adaptation was not carried out at low enough temperatures, or clones of adequately attenuated virus were not isolated from a genetically mixed population of cold adapted virus. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION This invention provides cold adapted mutant RSV, specifically, mutant RSV of subgroup A and B. A pharmaceutical composition containing the above composition is provided herein. This is especially useful as vaccine. Further provided by this invention is a use of the mutant RSV of the invention for the manufacture of a medicament for eliciting an immunogenic response in a human or mammal. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES Figures 1A and 1B show flow charts detailing the propagation of RSV 2B working seed MK7V14b and RSV 3A working seed MK8V17b. Figure 2 shows growth and cytopathic effect of RSV 2B at temperatures from 26°C to 36°C in Vero cells. Figure 3 shows growth and cytopathic effect of RSV 3A at temperatures from 26°C to 36°C in Vero cells. Figures 4A,4B,4C,4D,4E and 4F graphically show titration results obtained at each passaae of RSV 2B and RSV 3A. Figures 5A,5B,5C,5D,5E and 5F show the growth curves of RSV 2B, RSV 2Bp24G, RSV 2Bp20L, RSV 3A, RSV 3Ap20E and RSV 3Ap20F in Vero cells at temperatures from 20°C to 40°C. Figures 6A and 6B compare graphically the growth of RSV 2B and RSV 2Bp20L in cotton rats from 3 to 7 days post-infection. Figures 7A and 7B compare the relative growth and pathogenicity of RSV 2B and RSV 2Bp20L in four (4) year old seropositive chimps. Figures 8A and 8B are diagrams showing virus titrations for monkeys infected with the RSV 2B TS mutants and subsequently challenged with the parental strain. Figures 9A and 9B are diagrams showing virus growth in African green monkey cells infected with the RSV 3A TS mutants and challanged with the parental 3A strain. Figures 10A, 10B and 10C are diagrams showing a growth study in African green monkeys comparing TS-1 with RSV 2Bp33F and 3Ap28F. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION This invention provides a cold adapted mutant respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). This mutant RSV is capable of eliciting an immune response when administered to a subject without causing significant disease, such as respiratory distress or otitis media. As used herein, the term "cold adapted mutant" means an attenuated virus that has been attenuated by propagation at lower than optimal temperatures. Examples of cold adapted mutant viruses have been provided in the background of the invention section, supra . In one embodiment of this invention, the cold adapted mutant RSV is a mutant subgroup A RSV. In a preferred embodiment, the mutant RSV subgroup A virus is a virus selected from the group consisting of 3Ap20E, 3Ap20F and 3Ap28F. Also provided by this invention is a cold adapted mutant RSV, wherein the cold adapted mutant is of the subgroup B. In a preferred embodiment, the cold adapted subgroup B virus is a virus selected from the group consisting of 2Bp33F, 2Bp24G, 2Bp20L and 2Bp34L. The viruses of this invention are useful (1) as live virus vaccines, (2) as a source of genetic material to give, enhance, or stabilize an attenuated phenotype of any RSV strain, (3) as a source of immunogenic polypeptide, (4) as a source of genetic material for recombinant expression of immunogenic polypeptides by a live virus or bacterial vector (e.g. baculovirus, vaccinia virus, adenovirus, attenuated Salmonella), (5) as viral vectors for expression of immunogenic proteins from other viruses, e.g., RSV F and G proteins, influenza HA and NA proteins, parainfluenza HN and F proteins, and (6) as a source of reagents to detect antibody in immunological assays or nucleic acid in enzyme amplification assays (e.g., polymerase chain reaction (PCR)). This invention also encompasses all derived strains of the above-identified cold adapted mutants of the parental 3A and 2B strains, including, but not limited to those strains attenuated by chemical mutagenesis, cold adaptation, or genetic recombination, e.g. site-directed mutagenesis. These methods are well-known to those of skill in the art. Vaccines and pharmaceutical compositions containing these virus are described infra. A pharmaceutical composition comprising the cold adapted mutant RSV described above and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is also provided by this invention. As used herein, the term "pharmaceutically acceptable carrier" encompasses any of the standard pharmaceutical carriers, such as physiologically balanced culture medium, phosphate buffer saline solution, water, and emulsions, such as an oil/water or water/oil emulsion, various types of wetting agents and protein stabilizer. In one embodiment of this invention, the pharmaceutical composition is intended for use as a vaccine. In one embodiment a virus may be mixed with cryoprotective additives or stabilizers such as proteins (e.g., albumin, gelatin), sugars (e.g., sucrose, lactose, sorbitol), amino acids (e.g., sodium glutamate), saline, or other protective agents. This mixture is then dessicated or lyophilized for transport and storage and mixed with water immediately prior to administration. Alternatively, the virus may be inactivated by formalin or heat, and mixed with an adjuvant such as aluminum hydroxide, saline and a detergent such as phosphate Tween buffer. For methods of vaccine preparation, see Duffy, (1982). Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the cold adapted mutant RSV is useful to vaccinate a subject against RSV infection. Thus, this invention further provides a use of the mutant RSV described above for the manufacture of a medicament for eliciting an immunogenic response in a human or mammal. This subject may be animal, for example a mammal, such as a chimp or preferably a human. A sufficient amount of the vaccine must be administered to the subject to elicit an immune response. Persons skilled in the art will readily be able to determine such amounts. Administration may be by any effective form, such as intranasally, parenterally, intravenously, orally, or topically applied to any mucosal surface such as intranasal, oral, eye or rectal surface. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, live viral vaccines are administered intranasally, orally parenterally or applied to any mucosal surface (nasal, oral, eye, rectal) as described hereinabove. Inactivated whole virus vaccine is preferably administered parenterally or to any mucosal surface. This invention further provides a method to attenuate a virus by cold-adaptation. Samples of mutant RSV of this invention have been deposited with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 12301 Parklawn Drive, Rockville, Maryland, U.S.A. 20852, under the provisions of the Budapest Treaty for the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedures ("Budapest Treaty"). The virus were accorded the following ATCC designation numbers: 2Bp33F(VR 2364), 2Bp24G(VR 2370), 2Bp20L(VR 2368), 2Bp34L(VR 2365), 3Ap20E(VR 2369), 3Ap20F(VR 2367), and 3Ap28F(VR 2366). EXEMPLIFICATION Passage and Characterization of RSV 2B and RSV 3A Parental Strains RSV 2B and RSV 3A parental strains were isolated and passed in qualified cell lines and under conditions consistent with use as clinical study material. Two RSV strains, 20648 and 23095, were isolated by Dr. Robert Belshe (Marshall University School of Medicine, West Virginia) from nasal swab samples taken from ill children. These viruses were later recovered from the original frozen nasal swab samples, passed 2 to 3 times in primary rhesus monkey kidney (PRMK) cells, and then sent to applicants. Isolate 20648 (subgroup B) was renamed RSV 2B. Virus was passed 7 times in PRMK cells at 35°C, 2 times in Vero cells at 35°C and plaque purified and amplified 3 times (6 passages) in Vero cells at 36°C. Virus was further amplified an additional 2 times in Vero (36°C), stocks were filtered with a 0.2 m filter and amplified another 2 times in Vero cells. This was followed by production of a Master Seed (RSV 2B, MK7 V12b), Intermediate working seed (RSV 2B, MK7 V13b) and Working seed (RSV 2B, MK7 V14b). See Figure 1A. Isolate 23095 (subgroup A) was renamed RSV 3A. RSV 3A was passed 8 times in PRMK cells at 35°C. This was followed by 2 passages in Vero at 35°C and 6 passages in Vero cells at 36°C, including 3 plaque purification steps. Virus was further passaged 6 times in Vero cells at 36 o C including a 0.2 µm filtration step. This was followed by production of a Master seed (RSV 3A, MK8 V15b), Intermediate working seed (RSV 3A, MK8 V16b), and Working seed (RSV 3A, MK8 V17b). See Figure 1B. Subgroup specificities of RSV 2B and RSV 3A Master seeds were confirmed using subgroup specific monoclonal antibodies. Virus stocks were shown to be free of microbial contaminants and adventitious agents. The F, N, and G proteins of RSV 2B and RSV 3A stocks and reference RSV strains A2, Long, and 18537 were analyzed by radioimmunoprecipitation (RIP) and western blotting procedures using monoclonal antibodies. The F1 subunits of the RSV subgroup B strains, 2B and 18537, migrated faster on SDS-polyacrylamide gels than did the F1 subunits of the RSV subgroup A strains, 3A and Long. No difference in migration of the N proteins of the RSV 2B and 3A strains and the reference strains was seen. In RIP gels, the G protein was visible as two bands at ∼ 80-90 Kda and ∼ 45 Kda. The 80-90 Kda bands of RSV 3A and Long comigrated; however, the 80-90 Kda band of RSV 2B also appeared to comigrate with the subgroup A species rather than with the faster RSV 18537 (subgroup B1). This suggests that RSV 2B may be a member of the B2 subgroup as described by Akerlind et al., 1988. In western blots, the relative proportions of 80-90 Kda and 45 Kda bands were roughly equal for RSV Long, A2, 2B, and 18537 grown in Vero cells, but staining of the 80-90 Kda band of RSV 3A was significantly greater, suggesting a difference in processing of the G protein for this strain when grown in Vero cells. These data demonstrate that the apparent M r for the RSV 2B and RSV 3A strains are consistent with current subgroup classifications of RSV, but confirm that these strains are not identical to the prototype RSV reference strains. Growth of RSV 2B, RSV 3A and RSV A2 in mice and in cotton rats was compared. Both RSV 2B and RSV 3A replicated poorly in Balb/c mice compared to the RSV A2 reference strain. Consistent recovery of RSV 2B and RSV 3A could only be obtained at the highest inoculum dose used (10 6.0-6.2 PFU), and was similar in magnitude to recovery of RSV A2 at a 100-fold lower inoculum (10 4.3 PFU). In contrast, growth of RSV 2B in cotton rat nose and lungs was similar to growth of RSV A2. Growth of RSV 3A in the nose was similar to the other strains; however growth in lungs was significantly poorer. Both mouse and cotton rat growth data indicate that RSV 2B and RSV 3A have significantly different in vivo growth characteristics than the RSV A2 reference strain, as well as differing from each other. Cold Adaptation of RSV In order to select an appropriate starting temperature for cold adaptation of RSV, growth of the RSV 2B and RSV 3A parental strains in Vero cells at temperatures ranging from 26°C to 36°C was compared. Cells were infected at an MOI of 0.4 and virus yield and cytopathic effect (cpe) was monitored for 4 days. The results, shown in Figures 2 and 3, demonstrated that for both virus strains, growth at 30°C, 32°C, and 36°C was similar in kinetics and yield. At 26°C, virus growth laged behind growth at the higher temperatures by about 24 hours. The limiting factor in achieving optimum titers appeared to be the viral cpe, which occurred earlier at higher temperatures. For both RSV 2B and RSV 3A, optimum titers were achieved by maintaining cultures at 30°C. At this temperature, a lower level of cpe allowed growth and spread of virus to continue over a longer time period. The results suggested that these strains of RSV were already well adapted to growth at 30°C to 36°C. A maximum temperature of 26°C was selected as a starting temperature for cold adaptation, as virus growth at this temperature was suboptimal and therefore some selective pressure for cold adaptation would be exerted. Cold adaptation was initiated on virus stocks RSV 2B (passage MK7 V14) and RSV 3A (passage MK8 V14). To maximize the chance of recovering appropriately attenuated mutants from these cold adapted populations, two flasks of virus were independently passed using each of three different cold adaptation strategies. This provided a total of six cold adapted populations for RSV 2B and six for RSV 3A. Virus was passaged in 25 cm 2 flasks containing confluent Vero cell monolayers. At each passage, virus was harvested by replacing the maintenance medium (10 ml of MEM/2%FBS/20mMHepes) in the infected flask with a reduced volume of freezing medium (3 ml of MEM/10%FBS/20mMHepes) and performing a quick freeze at -70°C followed by a thaw at 32°C. To infect the next passage, 1 ml of the freeze-thaw lysate was transferred to a fresh flask of confluent Vero cells, virus was allowed to adsorb at room temperature (20°C-22°C), and then flasks were overlaid with maintenance medium (MEM/2%FBS/20mMHepes) and incubated at the appropriate temperature in water baths (i.e., 26°C, 22°C, 20°C). Titrations were performed at 32°C on each freeze-thaw lysate and the remainder of the material was stored at -70°C for future isolation of virus variants. Three passaging strategies were used. Flasks E and F were "slowly" adapted, beginning at 26°C with 4 passages every 2 days, followed by passage once every week until titers appeared to be relatively stable or were increasing. Virus was then passaged weekly at 22°C until consistently high titers were achieved, and finally maintained by passage every 1-2 weeks at 20°C. Flasks G, H ,and I were adapted by a more moderate strategy. Virus was passaged 2 times at 26°C at 3 day intervals, then passaged weekly at 22°C 5 times, and finally maintained by passage every 1-2 weeks at 20°C. Flasks J and L were "rapidly" adapted, starting with 5 weekly passages at 22°C, followed by passage at 1-2 week intervals at 20°C. Actual passage conditions and titration results are shown in Tables 1 and 2, and are summarized in Table 3. Titration results obtained at each passage are graphically displayed in Figures 4A,4B,4C,4D,4E and 4F. The titration results demonstrated an influence of strain on rate of adaptation. For RSV 2B, all three cold adaptation strategies eventually yielded high virus titers when flasks were maintained at 20°C. In contrast, RSV 3A was adapted to growth at 20°C using a "slow" strategy (E,F), but efforts to force a more rapid adaptation resulted in a precipitous decline in virus growth. Passage of these cultures (3A:H,I,J,L) was discontinued. To screen the cold adapted virus populations for accumulation of TS variants, virus taken from each flask following 5 and 17 weeks of cold adaptation was tested for efficiency of plaquing (EOP) at 39°C vs. 32°C. As seen in Table 4, in most cases plaquing efficiency of the cold passage virus was relatively high at 39°C (≥0.2) and was similar to values obtained with the parental virus control (≥0.6). The results showed that the cold adapted virus populations, with the possible exception of flask RSV 3A-F, had not become predominantly TS over a period of up to 17 low temperature passages. Following further cold passaging, attempts were made to isolate temperature sensitive mutants by plaque purifying virus from each cold adapted flask. Plaque purified mutants were initially identified by relatively poor growth (lower titers or smaller plaque size) at 39°C vs 32°C. In these assays, shown in Table 5, the percentage of plaque purified virus that could be clearly identified as temperature sensitive ranged from 0% to 40% of plaques picked. Several individual flasks (2B-H, 2B-L, 3A-E, 3A-F) appeared to contain a relatively higher percent of TS phenotypes, and in some cases the percentage of TS mutants increased over time. However, TS mutants did not appear to become a predominant variant over a period of up to 42 weeks of cold passaging. To summarize, cold passaging of RSV 2B and RSV 3A resulted in cold adaptation of virus based on the ability of virus to grow stably at 20°C with consistently high yields. Analysis of EOP assays and the rate of isolation of TS mutants indicated that although TS mutants did arise in the cold adapted virus populations, they did not become a predominant species. Screening for Vaccine Candidates TS mutants were further screened and selected for vaccine candidates based on degree of temperature sensitivity in vitro, attenuation in animal models (including mice, cotton rats, and chimps), and retention of neutralizing epitopes. Over a period of 39 weeks of cold adaptation, a total of 13 RSV 2B and 6 RSV 3A TS mutants were plaque purified a second time and further characterized. Comparison of EOP's at 37/32°C, 39/32°C, and/or 40/32°C confirmed that these mutants had reduced plaquing efficiency at the higher temperatures and represented a range of temperature sensitivity (see Table 6). Prior to completing the isolation of all 19 mutants described above, a group of 4 mutants, RSV 2Bp24G, RSV 2Bp20L, RSV 3Ap20E, and RSV 3Ap20F, were selected from the first set of plaque purified viruses for preliminary characterization. To look at actual virus growth curves, Vero cells were infected with these 4 mutants at an MOI of 2, and incubated at 20°C, 32°C, 37°C, and 40°C for 7 days. The results, shown in Figures 5A,5B,5C,5D,5E and 5F, indicated that all 4 mutants were cold adapted and temperature sensitive, as evidenced by earlier and higher rises in titer in cultures incubated at 20 o C, and reduced or absent growth of virus in cultures incubated at 37 o C, 39 o C, and 40 o C. Based on the degree of temperature sensitivity seen in EOP and growth studies, one subgroup A and one subgroup B mutant, RSV 2Bp20L and RSV 3Ap20E, were selected to perform additional preliminary experiments on phenotypic stability and growth in mice. The infectivity and immunogenicity of RSV 2Bp20L and RSV 3Ap20E were evaluated in Balb/c mice. Virus growth was measured in nasal wash and lung samples harvested 4 and 5 days post-infection and serum neutralizing antibody titers were determined 32 days post-infection. Results are shown in Table 7. Growth and immunogenicity of the parental virus was very low, but detectable. In contrast, no virus was recovered and no neutralizing antibody was detected following inoculation of the TS strains, indicating that these strains were highly attenuated in mice. Of the 19 TS mutants which were eventually isolated, four RSV 2B and 3 RSV 3A mutants were selected for further in vitro and in vivo characterization. These mutants included the original 4 mutants described above, as well as 3 mutants isolated at later time points. Selection criteria included demonstration of definite TS phenotype at both 37°C and 39°C and representation of both subgroups and varying passage strategies and passage numbers. These 7 TS mutants were plaque purified a third time and amplified to make small working stocks. Their passage histories are summarized in Table 8. The initial analysis of these mutant strains included comparison of plaguing efficiencies and plaque morphologies at 32°C, 37°C, and 39°C in Vero cells (Table 9), and growth at 32°C, 37°C, 39°C, and 40°C in Vero cells (Table 10). At 37°C and 39°C, EOP was reduced and small and intermediate plaque sizes predominated, indicating that mutants were TS. Some breakthrough of "wt" plaque size revertants was seen with all variants except RSV 2Bp34L and RSV 3Ap20F. In growth studies, Vero cells were infected with the virus strains at an MOI of 0.2 and virus yield was determined 4 days post-infection. Comparison of virus yields in Vero cells at the various temperatures demonstrated that virus yield, expressed as PFU per cell, decreased significantly at the higher temperatures (37°C, 39°C, 40°C). In some cases, virus yield was also somewhat reduced at 32°C relative to the parental strain, indicating attenuation in growth at 32°C. This is consistent with the smaller plaque sizes observed in the 32°C EOP assays (Table 9). For all strains, at least one plaque was detected in cells incubated at 39°C or 40°C, suggesting that some revertants were present. Both EOP and virus yield studies demonstrate that these 7 isolates possess varying levels of temperature sensitivity and may represent a range of levels of attenuation. Retention of neutralizing epitopes was examined by comparing reactivities of the 7 mutants and parental strains with 2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies representing antigenic sites A and C on the F protein described by Beeler and Coelingh (1989) (Table 11). Both antibodies were able to neutralize all the virus strains at similarly high dilutions, indicating that the neutralizing epitopes were intact. Growth and immunogenicity of the 7 TS mutant strains was evaluated in cotton rats. Groups of rats were inoculated intranasally with each mutant and lungs and nasal turbinates were harvested 4 days post-infection for virus titrations. Sera were collected from an identical set of rats 20 days post-infection to test for neutralizing and EIA antibody responses. A summary of virus titration and immunogenicity results are shown in Table 12. RSV 2B grew well in the nose and lungs, whereas growth of all 4 RSV 2B TS mutants was very poor. Two of the mutants, RSV 2Bp33F and RSV 2Bp24G, displayed a less attenuated phenotype than did RSV 2Bp20L and RSV 2Bp34L, as indicated by a slightly higher level of replication, as well as a 100% infection rate. The RSV 3A parental and TS mutant strains grew well in the nasal turbinates, but poorly in the lungs. Titers of the RSV 3A TS mutants were lower than that of the parental strain, indicating that the TS mutants were somewhat more attenuated than the parent virus. Neutralizing and EIA-F antibody titers on sera from rats infected with the RSV 2B and RSV 3A parental and TS mutant strains were also measured. The level of neutralizing and EIA-F antibody titer was low for the RSV 2B TS mutants, consistent with the low level of viral replication seen. Interestingly, titers from animals infected with RSV 2Bp33F were higher than would be expected in view of the low titration values, and may indicate an intermediate level of attenuation for this virus. Neutralizing and EIA-F antibody titrations on all 3 RSV 3A TS mutants demonstrated that these mutants were quite immunogenic, consistent with their high level of replication in nasal tissue. Growth of RSV 2Bp20L was further evaluated in cotton rats from 3 to 7 days post-infection to determine if failure to recover virus was due to a shift in timing of peak titers. RSV 2B was used as a positive control (see Figures 6A and 6B). The growth kinetics of RSV 2B were typical of other strains of RSV; peak titers occurred on days 4 and 5 in nasal turbinates and on day 4 in lungs. These results substantiate the use of day 4 as the optimal harvest day for the parental strain. RSV 2Bp20L was not detected in lungs and rare plaques were seen in nasal turbinate titrations on days 3, 5, 6, and 7, demonstrating that attenuation of this virus was not simply due to an early or late growth peak. Relative growth and immunogenicity of RSV 2B and RSV 2Bp20L were also compared in 4 year old seropositive chimps. Two chimps were infected intranasally with 10 4.0 and 10 5.0 PFU of RSV 2B, and 2 chimps were similarly infected with RSV 2Bp20L. The results are shown in Figures 7A and 7B and Table 13. Both chimps infected with RSV 2B developed a mild upper respiratory infection, consisting of nasal discharge and cough. Both chimps shed virus from 3 through 7 days postinfection. The amount of virus shed was higher and shedding occurred earlier in the chimp infected with the higher dose of RSV 2B. Neither chimp inoculated with RSV 2Bp20L showed clinical signs of disease or shed virus. Chemistry and hematology workups on all four chimps revealed no significant findings. Serum neutralizing and EIA-F, Ga, and Gb antibody titers were substantially increased 14 and 21 days post-infection with RSV 2B. No rises in antibody titers were seen in chimps inoculated with RSV 2Bp20L. The results indicated that, in seropositive chimps, the parental RSV 2B strain was infectious and immunogenic, whereas the RSV 2Bp20L mutant was highly attenuated. Determination Of The Immunopotency Of The Pharmaceutical Composition Immunopotency of the RSV related product or pharmaceutical composition can be determined by monitoring the immune response of test animals following immunization with the above-identified RSV live viral mutants. Test animals may include but are not limited to mice, rats (e.g. cotton rats), rabbits, primates e.g. African green monkeys, chimps, and human subjects. Methods of introduction of the immunogen may include oral, intradermal, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intravenous, subcutaneous, intranasal or any other standard routes of immunizations. The immune response of the test subjects can be analyzed by four approaches: (a) the reactivity of the resultant immune serum to authentic RSV antigens, as assayed by known techniques, e.g. , enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA), immunoblots, radioimmunoprecipitations, etc., (b) the ability of the immune serum to neutralize RS virus infectivity in vitro, (c) the ability of the immune serum to inhibit virus fusion in vitro and (d) protection from RSV infection or significant disease. The following data demonstrates the utility of RSV TS mutants in a vaccine composition. Experiments demonstrating efficacy of vaccines in a cotton rat model, and attenuation, immunogenicity, and efficacy of vaccines in an African green monkey model are described. i) Cotton Rat Model: Additional experiments were done in cotton rats to evaluate the efficacy of the RSV 2B and 3A TS mutants in preventing infection when challenged with a reference strain of the homologous subgroup (RSV 18537/subgroup B and RSV A2/subgroup A). Cotton rats (8 per group) were inoculated intranasally with each RSV TS mutant. Nasal turbinates and lungs were harvested 4 days post-infection, from 4 rats per group, for virus titrations. Six weeks post-infection, the remaining rats were bled for neutralizing and EIA-F titers, then challenged with the appropriate reference RSV strain. Four days post-challenge, nasal turbinates and lungs were removed for virus titration. Results are shown in Tables 14 and 15. As discussed previously and shown in Table 12, growth of all four RSV 2B TS mutants was very poor compared to the parental RSV 2B strain. Neutralizing and EIA antibody titers elicited by RSV 2Bp33F and RSV 2Bp24G were relatively high despite poor virus recovery, possibly indicating an intermediate level of attenuation for both mutants. Level of protection against virus challenge reflected the level of neutralizing antibody response and was high for RSV 2Bp33F and 2Bp24G, moderate for RSV 2Bp20L, and ineffective for RSV 2Bp34L. All RSV 3A strains grew in the nasal turbinates but demonstrated a high level of attenuation in growth in the lungs. Titers of neutralizing and EIA antibodies were high and all rats were completely protected against virus challenge. The results demonstrate that growth of the attenuated strains elicited protective immunity against virus challenge, suggesting that these strains may be useful as vaccine. Failure of vaccination with the RSV 2Bp34L strain to protect was most likely due to failure of virus to grow due to its high level of attenuation. Since cotton rats are a less susceptible host than humans, failure of this strain to protect does not imply that 2Bp34L would be an ineffective vaccine in humans. ii) African Green Monkey Model : Growth, immunogenicity, and efficacy of TS mutant strains RSV 2Bp33F, 2Bp24G, 2Bp20L, 3Ap20E, 3Ap20F, and 3Ap28F were evaluated in African green monkeys (AGMs). AGMs are more susceptible to infection with human RSV than are the cotton rats, and characteristics of infection may be more relevant to that seen in humans because of the closer phylogenetic relationship. Two AGMs each were inoculated with 10 6 PFU of each mutant virus by combined intranasal and intratracheal route. Virus growth was evaluated by nasal wash and bronchial lavage. Neutralizing and EIA antibody responses were tested at approximately 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 weeks post-infection. Eight weeks post-infection, animals were challenged with 10 6 PFU of the parental strain by intranasal and intratrachial route. Virus growth and antibody response was evaluated as described above. Growth of the parental RSV 2B and 3A strains can be seen in Figures 8A, 8B, 9A and 9B: vaccine controls. Both virus strains grew to high titers in both the nose and lung. Nasal discharge and radiographic evidence of viral pneumonia was seen in one control monkey (032B) infected with RSV 2B, demonstrating that RSV is capable of causing disease in AGMs. These results confirm differences in these characteristics of infection in AGMs vs the cotton rat model, in which disease was not observed and RSV 3A was unable to replicate in the lung. Failure of the parental strains of RSV to cause disease in 3 of 4 monkeys suggests that the AGMs are not as susceptible a host as are humans. Virus titrations for each monkey infected with the RSV 2B TS mutants and then challenged with the parental strain are shown in Figures 8A and 8B. RSV 2Bp33F grew to low levels in the nasal wash in 1 of 2 monkeys, RSV 2Bp24G grew to low levels in nasal wash or in lungs in both monkeys. RSV 2Bp20L failed to grow. In those AGMs where the RSV 2B TS mutants grew, monkeys were partially to fully protected against challenge with parental strain. Tables 16 and 17 give antibody titration results obtained for each monkey post-vaccination (Table 16) and post-virus challenge (Table 17). Results show that in monkeys where virus grew, low levels of neutralizing and EIA antibody titers were seen by 2.5 weeks post-infection. Following challenge with the parental strain, antibody titers boosted one full week earlier in vaccinated monkeys with antibody titers prior to challenge, than in vaccinated animals which failed to seroconvert or in unvaccinated controls. This demonstrated that vaccination with these TS mutants was sufficient to both prime the immune system and to elicit protection against virus challenge. Because these monkeys are not as susceptible to infection as humans, failure of attenuated virus to grow and to effectively immunize does not imply that virus would not be effective in a fully susceptible host (i.e. seronegative human infant). Virus growth in AGMs infected with the RSV 3A TS mutants and challenged with the parental 3A strain are shown in Figures 9A and 9B. All 3 RSV 3A TS mutant strains were attenuated in growth, in the order of most to least attenuated: 3Ap28F>3Ap20E>3Ap20F. Vaccination with all 3 TS mutants afforded excellent protection against virus challenge. Antibody response for monkeys vaccinated with RSV 3A TS mutants is shown in Table 18, and response following virus challenge is shown in Table 19. In all vaccinated AGMs, with the exception of one monkey given RSV 3Ap28F, low levels of neutralizing and EIA antibody titers were detected beginning 3 weeks post-vaccination. Following challenge with the parental strain, all vaccinated monkeys boosted a full week earlier than the unvaccinated controls and were protected either fully or partially from infection, demonstrating that vaccination primed the immune response and was protective. This included the one AGM in which antibody response was not detected following vaccination, indicating that measure of serum antibody response may not be fully representative of level of protective immunity. The results from the AGM studies again demonstrate that all six TS mutants tested were attenuated. Vaccination with those mutants which were able to replicate in these monkeys was efficacious in preventing infection with challenge virus. Degree of Attenuation : An RSV TS mutant, TS-1, was obtained from Dr. Brian Murphy, NIH. This TS mutant was originally derived from the RSV A2 strain by chemical mutagenesis and was tested in clinical trials in seronegative human infants in the 1970's. The outcome of these trials suggested that TS-1 was underattenuated and caused an unacceptable level of disease (rhinitis and otitis media) in infants. In addition, the TS phenotype of TS-1 partially reverted following growth in humans. Experiments have been carried out which compare growth of the RSV 2B and 3A TS mutants with that of the TS-1 mutant in an attempt to assess the relative in vivo attenuation level of the RSV 2A and 3B mutants, and to demonstrate differences between these mutants and what had been used by others in previous clinical trials. The results of the cotton rat study are shown in Table 20, and may be compared directly with the cotton rat data shown in Tables 14 and 15. The TS-1 mutant was less attenuated than the RSV 2B and 3A TS mutants, as can most clearly be seen by comparing growth in the lung. A growth study in African green monkeys (AGMs) comparing TS-1 with RSV 2Bp33F and 3Ap28F was carried out and the results are shown in Figures 10A, 10B and 10C. Monkeys were infected with virus either intranasally (TS-1 and 2Bp33F) or intranasally + intratracheally (3Ap28F). Virus was recovered in 1 of 4 monkeys infected with 2Bp33F and 2 of 4 monkeys infected with 3Ap28F. Titers were relatively low in both cases, indicating that virus was attenuated. In contrast, relatively high titers of virus were recovered in all 4 monkeys inoculated with TS-1. In 2 of 4 monkeys, the levels of TS-1 titers were equivalent to those seen in monkeys infected with wild type virus. TS-1 did not spread to the lungs, as would be expected for wild type virus, indicating that TS-1 was somewhat attenuated. The results clearly show that RSV 2Bp33F and 3Ap28F have different phenotypic characteristics than TS-1 and are significantly more attenuated. This higher level of attenuation is a property that is desirable for a vaccine to be administered to human infants. Isolation of Monoclonal Antibodies For the isolation of mouse monoclonal antibodies, eight (8) week old mice are inoculated intranasally with live RSV and/or are injected with about 50 micrograms of the mutant RSV in complete Freund's adjuvant 1:1 volume. Mice may then be boosted, at monthly intervals with the mutant RSV, this with incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Splenocytes are then fused with non-secreting myeloma cells, according to procedures which have been described and are known to those of skill in the art to which this invention pertains. Some time later, approximately two (2) weeks later, hybridoma supernatent is screened for binding activity against the polypeptide. Positive clones are isolated and propagated. Isolates of human monoclonal antibodies can be done similarly, except B cells can be isolated from patients and transformed with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). The B cells are then fused with non-secreting myeloma cells according to procedures which have been described and are known to those of skill in the art to which this invention pertains. Some time later, approximately two (2) weeks later, hybridoma supernatent will be screened for binding activity against the mutant RSV. Positive clones are isolated and propagated. Alternatively human monoclonal antibodies can be prepared using methods described in Patent Nos. 4,720,459, 4,693,975 or 4,574,116, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. These monoclonal antibodies are useful for diagnostic assays and therapy. Cold-Adaptation of Virus This method comprises obtaining live virulent virus (RSV) derived from clinical isolates and that have been isolated in primary rhesus monkey kidney cells. These are then passed in Vero cells at 35-36°C and plaque purified. Preferably, the Vero cells are passage 133 to 148 of the Vero cell line CCL81, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 12301 Parklawn Drive, Rockville, Maryland, U.S.A. 20852. Maintenance medium is preferable MEM with 2% FBS, L-glutamine, non-essential amino acids and 20mM Hepes pH 7.5, and freezing medium is MEM with 10% FBS and 20mM Hepes pH 7.5. A confluent monolayer of Vero cells are inoculated with about 1.0ml of virus inoculum and virus is allowed to absorb for about 1 to 2 hours (preferably, 70 to 120 minutes, and most preferably 90 minutes) at ambient temperature (about 18°C to about 25°C). The virus flask is incubated at about 18°C to about 26°C, preferably about 20°C, for about two to fifteen days. Virus is harvested by removing the medium and replacing it with freezing medium. The flask is then frozen directly at -70°C, then thawed in a 32°C water bath. A portion (about 1 ml) is removed from the freeze thaw lysate and is used to inoculate Vero cells and the process is repeated. The remaining freeze-thau lysate is stored at -70°C. It can be used to perform virus titrations and plaque purify virus. To plaque purify virus, the freeze-thaw lysate is thawed in a 32°C water bath. About 3 to 5 serial dilutions of the lysate is made in maintenance medium. Six-well, twenty-four well, or ninety-six well plates containing confluent Vero cells are rinsed with a phosphate buffered saline solution. Wells are inoculated with virus dilution, using only enough volume to cover bottom of well. Virus inoculum is adsorbed for 90 minutes at ambient temperature. Wells are overlaid with 1% methylcellulose in MEM-maintenance medium. Plates are incubated at 32°C for 5 days. Isolated plaques are identified microscopically by looking for typical syncytial plaques, and wells are marked. Plaques are picked at marked sites using small bore pipette or pipette tip and are emulsified in 0.5 ml maintenance medium for 1-3 hours at 4°C. Picked plaques are used to inoculate duplicates of 25 cm 2 flask or 96-well plates containing Vero cell monolayers as described above. Duplicate inoculated flasks or plates are overlaid with maintenance medium. One duplicate is incubated at 32°C and the other at 39°C for 5-10 days. Flasks or plates incubated at 32°C are examined microscopically for virus CPE. Flasks or plates incubated at 39°C are stained by immunoperoxidase assay for RSV specific antigen. Flasks or plates which demonstrate easily detectable CPE at 32°C and little or no detectable RSV antigen by immunoperoxidase staining are selected as containing TS mutants. Virus from the selected flask or plate described above are harvested by freeze-thaw technique. This virus represents a plaque purified mutant. DISCUSSION Cold adaptation was used to develop attenuated strains of RSV from two parental strains derived from clinical isolates. Seven TS mutants were isolated, 4 from a subgroup B virus (RSV 2B) and 3 from a subgroup A virus (RSV 3A). All 7 mutants displayed a temperature sensitive phenotype in Vero cell culture, each with unique characteristics. All mutants were attenuated in growth in cotton rats, but displayed different phenotypes. Growth of one of the TS mutants, RSV 2Bp20L, was shown to be attenuated in seropositive chimpanzees. All 7 mutants retained 2 major neutralization epitopes. Cold adaptation of RSV had previously been done in primary or diploid cell lines (bovine embryonic kidney, WI38, and cercopithecus monkey kidney) at temperatures beginning at 34°C-37°C and decreasing to 25°C-26°C. No attempt had been made to isolate multiple individual mutant phenotypes from the cold adapted virus (Friedewald et al, 1968; Maassab and DeBorde, 1985; Frickey, 1969). This approach to cold adapting RSV differed in several significant ways from these previous attempts. This procedure started with a subgroup A and subgroup B virus of different strains than those used previously. These strains bore distinct phenotypic differences from the reference strains and each other. These strains were passed several times to adapt virus to Vero cells and to plaque purify virus. Virus was passaged in a continuous cell line, Vero cells, rather than a diploid or primary cell line. Several strategies of temperature change were used, to provide a greater potential for isolation of a variety of mutant phenotypes. Unlike previous RSV cold adaptation strategies where cold adaptation had started at 34-37°C and gone down to 25-26°C, applicants started at either 26°C (since applicants found that the parental strains grew well at this temperature) or 22°C, and gradually reduced the growth temperature to 20°C. Passage strategies attempted to cover both the recommendation of "slow" adaptation to very low temperatures as proposed by Massab and DeBorde (1985), as well as efforts to try a faster and more aggressive approach. RNA viruses mutate at such a high frequency that any population of virus will contain a number of individual virus variants (Holland et al, 1982), therefore a variety of virus mutants were isolated from individual flasks at various virus passage levels and from different cold adaptation strategies. The results were interesting and somewhat unexpected. The rate at which virus became adapted (i.e., grew to consistently high titers at the 20°C temperature), was most affected by the strain of virus used, implying a significant host-related factor in adaptation. RSV 2B easily adapted to the cold temperatures, even using a rapid adaptation scheme. In contrast, RQV 3A grew poorly at the low temperatures. RSV 3A was eventually cold adapted using the slow passage scheme, but the more rapid adaptation approaches did not appear promising and were discontinued. Based on cold adaptation experiences reported by other researchers, it was expected TS mutants would arise and eventually become the predominant virus variants in the cold adapted populations. For example, Belshe and Hissom (1982) reported that with parainfluenza virus type 3 adapted to grow at 20°C, 80% of plaque purified virus clones were TS by passage 18 and 100% were TS by passage 45. In this study, even after 38-40 low temperature passages, including up to 32 passages done at 20°C, RSV TS mutants remained a minor population. This would suggest that TS and cold adapted phenotypes may not be as strongly linked in RSV as they are in other viruses. Level of attenuation is a critical factor in developing vaccines for any target population and is of particular importance for vaccines intended for infants and young children. Virus must be sufficiently attenuated to not cause disease, yet grow well enough in the vaccine to elicit protective immunity. Widely accepted markers for attenuation are TS phenotype and reduced growth in animal models, however these markers are only approximate and testing must eventually be done in the target population. The RSV 3A TS mutants could be distinguished from the RSV 3A parental virus by reduced replication in both the nose and lungs. Also of note, although the RSV 3A parental virus grew much better in the nose than the lungs of cotton rats, virus recovery was similar in both nose and lungs of BALB/c mice. These data suggest that the attenuation seen in cotton rats is due to more than one factor, and that this factor is not directly related to temperature sensitivity as measured in vitro . The cotton rat is relatively nonpermissive for growth of RSV and disease does not develop, suggesting that this model is an unreliable indicator of level of attenuation in humans. In contrast, chimpanzees are highly susceptible to RSV infection and develop an upper and lower respiratory tract disease that is very similar to that seen in humans. In seropositive chimps applicants found the RSV 2B parental strain caused mild upper respiratory tract disease similar to that caused by natural RSV infections in adult humans. The RSV 2Bp20L mutant did not grow, clearly demonstrating that this TS mutant was attenuated in a permissive host as well as the non-permissive cotton rat. The level of attenuation is best assessed in a seronegative chimp, as prior virus exposure will affect the host response to virus challenge. Unfortunately, testing in seronegative chimps is severely hampered by the limited availability of these animals. The mutants of this invention that have been examined here bear the desirable traits of an attenuated, phenotypically stable, and immunogenic RSV vaccine virus in the human target population. RSV 2B COLD ADAPTATION E, F Passage # Cumm. Time Passage Weeks Incubation Virus Yield Temp °C Time Days log 10 PFU E F 1 0.2 26 2 6.9 6.7 2 0.4 26 2 6.0 6.1 3 0.6 26 2 5.5 5.6 4 0.8 26 2 4.5 4.7 5 1.0 26 7 4.9 5.0 6 2.0 26 7 6.2 6.3 7 3.0 26 7 7.9 7.6 8 4.0 22 7 7.5 7.6 9 5.0 22 7 7.3 7.3 10 6.0 22 7 7.2 7.2 11 7.0 22 7 7.5 7.7 12 8.0 22 7 8.0 7.9 13 9.0 22 7 8.0 7.9 14 10.0 20 7 7.6 7.7 15 11.0 20 7 7.0 5.9 16 12.0 20 7 7.2 7.1 17 13.0 20 7 6.7 6.3 18 15.0 20 14 5.5 5.2 19 17.0 20 14 6.3 6.0 20 18.0 20 7 6.1 5.8 21 19.0 20 7 5.4 5.7 22 20.0 20 7 5.9 5.7 23 21.0 20 7 6.3 5.5 24 22.0 20 7 6.9 6.3 25 23.0 20 7 6.8 6.6 26 24.0 20 8 6.6 6.3 27 25.0 20 7 6.3 6.0 28 26.0 20 6 6.5 6.2 29 27.0 20 7 6.2 6.3 30 28.0 20 7 7.0 7.2 31 29.0 20 7 7.3 7.1 32 30.0 20 7 6.8 6.5 33 31.0 20 7 6.9 6.7 34 32.0 20 7 6.9 7.0 35 33.0 20 7 7.4 7.0 36 34.0 20 7 7.2 7.1 37 35.0 20 7 7.4 7.0 38 36.0 20 7 7.4 7.1 39 37.0 20 7 7.5 7.0 40 38.0 20 7 7.2 6.7 RSV 2B COLD ADAPTATION G, H Passage # Cumm.Time Passage Weeks Incubation Virus Yield Temp °C Time Days log 10 PFU G H 1 0.3 26 3 7.1 7.1 2 0.7 26 3 6.9 6.9 3 1.0 22 7 6.4 6.4 4 2.0 22 7 6.4 6.3 5 3.0 22 7 6.6 6.4 6 4.0 22 7 6.9 6.8 7 5.0 22 7 6.9 6.7 8 6.0 20 7 6.3 6.3 9 7.0 20 7 6.2 6.3 10 8.0 20 7 6.6 6.9 11 9.0 20 7 7.0 7.0 12 10.0 20 7 7.0 7.4 13 11.0 20 7 6.3 7.3 14. 12.0 20 7 7.7 7.9 15 13.0 20 7 7.2 7.4 16 15.0 20 14 6.4 6.3 17 16.0 20 8 6.8 6.9 18 17.0 20 6 6.9 7.0 19 18.0 20 7 6.9 7.1 20 19.0 20 7 6.7 7.0 21 20.0 20 7 6.4 6.5 22 21.0 20 7 6.5 7.0 23 22.0 20 7 6.9 7.1 24 23.0 20 7 6.8 6.7 25 24.0 20 8 6.4 6.2 26 25.0 20 7 6.0 5.5 27 26.0 20 6 6.3 5.5 28 27.0 20 7 6.5 5.9 29 28.0 20 7 7.1 6.4 30 29.0 20 7 6.1 7.1 31 30.0 20 7 6.4 5.5 32 31.0 20 7 6.2 5.9 33 32.0 20 7 6.4 6.2 34 33.0 20 7 6.4 6.9 35 34.0 20 7 6.9 6.5 36 35.0 20 7 7.0 6.7 35 37.0 20 7 7.1 7.2 RSV 2B COLD ADAPTATION J,L Passage # Cumm.Time Passage Weeks Incubation Virus Yield Temp °C Time Days log 10 PFU J L 1 1.0 22 7 6.8 2 2.0 22 7 7.1 3 3.0 22 7 6.7 4 4.0 22 7 5.9 6.1 5 5.0 22 7 4.8 5.7 6 6.0 20 7 4.9 5.0 7 7.0 20 7 4.8 4.9 8 9.0 20 14 6.0 6.0 9 11.0 20 14 6.6 6.3 10 12.0 20 7 6.9 6.9 11 13.0 20 7 6.6 6.7 12 15.0 20 14 6.0 6.0 11 16.0 20 8 6.3 6.3 14 17.0 20 6 6.2 6.5 15 18.0 20 7 6.6 6.7 16 19.0 20 7 6.4 6.9 17 20.0 20 7 6.5 6.9 18 21.0 20 7 6.9 7.0 19 22.0 20 7 7.4 7.4 20 23.0 20 7 7.2 7.4 21 24.0 20 6 7.0 7.1 22 25.0 20 7 6.8 6.9 23 26.0 20 6 6.9 7.0 24 27.0 20 7 7.0 7.0 25 28.0 20 7 7.8 7.4 26 29.0 20 7 7.5 7.3 27 30.0 20 7 6.8 6.7 28 31.0 20 7 6.9 6.8 29 32.0 20 7 7.0 6.9 30 33.0 20 7 7.4 7.2 31 34.0 20 7 7.3 6.7 32 35.0 20 7 7.3 6.9 33 36.0 20 7 7.3 7.0 34 37.0 20 7 7.2 6.9 35 38.0 20 7 6.6 6.3 RSV 3A COLD ADAPTATION E Passage # Cumm. Time Passage Weeks Incubation Virus Yield Temp °C Time Days log 10 PFU E 1 0.2 26 2 6.2 2 0.4 26 2 5.1 3 0.6 26 2 4.7 4 0.8 26 2 3.8 5 1.0 26 7 4.0 6 2.0 26 7 5.0 7 3.0 26 7 6.1 8 4.0 22 7 6.0 9 5.0 22 7 5.6 10 6.0 22 7 5.8 11 7.0 22 7 5.7 12 8.0 22 7 5.9 13 9.0 22 7 5.9 14 11.0 20 14 5.8 15 13.0 20 14 6.1 16 15.0 20 14 4.8 17 17.0 20 14 4.9 18 19.0 20 14 4.8 19 20.0 20 7 4.3 20 22.0 20 14 4.9 21 24.0 20 14 5.2 22 26.0 20 15 5.6 23 28.C 20 13 6.3 24 30.0 20 14 6.3 25 32.0 20 14 7.3 26 34.0 20 14 7.8 27 36.0 20 14 7.2 28 38.0 20 14 7.4 29 40.0 20 14 6.8 30 42.0 20 14 7.3 RSV 3A COLD ADAPTATION F Passage # Cumm. Time Passage Weeks Incubations Virus Yield Temp °C Time Days log 10 PFU F 1 0.2 26 2 6.1 2 0.4 26 2 5.1 3 0.6 26 2 4.7 4 0.8 26 2 3.6 5 1.0 26 7 4.3 6 2.0 26 7 5.3 7 3.0 26 7 6.4 8 4.0 22 7 6.3 9 5.0 22 7 5.2 10 6.0 22 7 5.8 11 7.0 22 7 5.7 12 8.0 22 7 6.0 13 9.0 22 7 5.6 14 11.0 20 14 5.5 15 13.0 20 14 5.4 16 15.0 20 14 3.9 17 17.0 20 14 3.7 18 19.0 20 14 3.5 19 21.0 20 14 3.8 20 23.0 20 14 4.2 21 25.0 20 15 3.2 22 27.0 20 13 3.9 23 29.0 20 14 4.5 24 31.0 20 14 4.7 25 33.0 20 14 4.8 26 35.0 20 14 5.3 27 37.0 20 14 5.5 28 39.0 20 14 5.8 RSV 3A COLD ADAPTATION H, I Passage # Cumm.Time Passage Weeks Incubation Virus Yield Temp °C Time Days log 10 PFU H I 1 0.3 26 3 6.9 7.0 2 0.7 26 3 6.1 6.4 3 1.0 22 7 5.8 5.8 4 2.0 22 7 5.8 5.9 5 3.0 22 7 5.9 5.7 6 4.0 22 7 5.6 5.5 7 5.0 22 7 5.1 5.1 8 6.0 20 7 4.0 3.8 9 7.0 20 7 3.3 2.8 10 9.0 20 14 3.9 3.2 11 11.0 20 14 3.9 3.1 12 13.0 20 14 4.0 3.0 J,L Passage # Cumm.Time Passage Weeks Incubation Virus Yield Temp °C Time Days log 10 PFU J L 1 1.0 22 7 6.7 2 2.0 22 7 6.7 3 3.0 22 7 6.0 4 4.0 22 7 5.7 5.6 5 5.0 22 7 4.2 4.9 6 6.0 20 7 3.7 3.7 7 7.0 20 7 3.1 3.0 8 9.0 20 14 2.8 3.2 9 11.0 20 14 2.3 3.3 10 13.0 20 14 1.0 2.8 Summary of Cold Adaptation Passage History. Virus #Parental Virus Passage #Cold Adaptation Passage PRMK Vero Vero 35°C 35°C 36°C Total Flask 26°C 22°C 20°C Total 23 7 2 12 21 E,F 7 6 27 40 G,H 2 5 32 39 J,L 0 5 30 35 3A 8 2 12 22 E 7 6 17 30 F 7 6 15 28 H,I 2 5 5 12 J,L 0 5 5 10 Efficiency of Plaquing of Cold Passaged Virus Virus EOP 39/32°C Week 5 Week 17 2B 0.8 0.6 2B-E 0.6 0.6 2B-F 0.8 0.7 2B-G 0.6 0.8 2B-H 0.7 0.4 2B-J ND 0.9 2B-L 0.7 0.6 3A 0.6 0.6 3A-E 0.6 0.4 3A-F 0.8 0.2 3A-H 0.6 ND 3A-I 0.9 ND 3A-J 0.6 ND 3A-L 0.6 ND TS Mutants Plaque Purified from Cold Adapted Virus RSV 2B RSV 3A Cumm./Passage Weeks # #TS/#Total Plaques Isolated Cumm./Passage Weeks # #TS/#Total Plaques Isolated E F E wk23/p25 0/10 1/10 wk22/p20 2/10 wk31/p33 0/10 1/10 wk32/p25 1/10 wk38/p40 0/10 1/10 wk42/p30 3/9 G H F wk23/p24 1/10 2/10 wk23/p20 1/9 wk31/p32 0/10 2/10 wk31/p24 0/10 wk38/p29 1/10 4/10 wk37/p27 1/10 wk39/p28 2/5 J L wk23/p20 0/9 1/10 wk31/p26 0/10 0/10 wk37/p34 0/8 2/9 wk38/p35 1/20 3/8 Summary of EOP Data on Twice Plaque Purified RSV TS Mutants RSV Isolate EOP 37/32°C 39/32°C 40/32°C 2B (parent) 0.7-1.0 0.6-0.8 0.4 2Bp33F (pp10-1) 0.5 0.002 ND 2Bp40F (pp7-2) 0.9 0.0008 ND 2Bp24G (pp2-1) 0.2 0.00001 <0.00001 2Bp39G (pp7-3) 1.0 0.009 ND 2Bp24H (pp3-2) ND 0.003 0.001 2Bp32H (pp6-2) 0.9 0.03 ND 2Bp39H (pp6-5) 1.0 0.04 ND 2Bp35J (pp2-1) 0.4 0.2 ND 2Bp20L (pp5-1) 0.02 ND <0.00001 2Bp34L (pp2-2) 0.005 0.0005 ND 2Bp35L (pp1-1) 0.3 0.02 ND 2Bp35L (pp2-1) 0.5 0.1 ND 2Bp35L (pp8-2) 0.2 0.05 ND 3A (parent) 1.0 0.5-0.9 0.6 3Ap20E (pp3-1) 0.6 0.006 0.000009 3Ap25E (pp7-5) 0.5 0.2 ND 3Ap30E (pp3-1) 0.4 0.08 ND 3Ap20F (pp4-3) 0.8 >0.1 0.000004 3Ap27F (pp1-2) 0.3 0.003 ND 3Ap28F (pp10-1) 0.2 0.002 ND ND = Not Done Monoclonal Antibody Neutralization of RSV 2B and RSV 3A Parental and TS Mutants Neutralization Titers Challenge Stains 143-6C 133-1H 2B 15,091 46,775 2Bp33F 23,364 32,690 2Bp24G >25,600 32,571 2Bp20L 25,972 32,790 2Bp34L 16,757 77,172 3A 99,814 46,493 3Ap20E 76,203 >25,600 2Ap20F 69,513 13,743 3Ap28F 80,436 34,136 Note: Neutralizations were done by a standard 60% plaque reduction neutralization assay on Vero cell monolayers in 96-well microtiter plates. Challenge with a 1:400 dilution of non-neutralizing monoclonal antibody 131-2G showed no reduction in titer in any of the nine strains. RSV GROWTH AND IMMUNOGENICITY IN AFRICAN GREEN MONKEYS: RSV 2B TS MUTANTS TS MUTANT VIRUS GROWTH IMMUNOGENICITY PEAK VIRUS TITER (log 10 PFU/ml) NEUTRALIZATION TITERS EIA TITERS (x10 3 ) VIRUS AGM NASAL LUNG DAY 2B A2 3A anti-F 2Bp23F SK034 <0.7 <0.7 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 7 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 14 <10 <10 <10 0.88 24 <10 <10 <10 0.49 27 <10 <10 <10 0.92 41 <10 <10 <10 0.26 2Bp33F SK028 2.9 <0.7 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 7 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 14 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 24 28 <10 <10 2.92 27 33 <10 <10 3.56 41 19 <10 11 1.74 2Bp24G SK012 <0.7 1.9 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 7 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 14 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 24 12 <10 <10 14.91 27 10 <10 <10 13.18 41 <10 <10 <10 11.05 2Bp24G SK030 3.2 <0.7 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 7 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 14 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 24 >440 10 204 34.13 27 404 21 190 37.64 41 256 <10 98 17.74 2Bp20L SKO33 <0.7 <0.7 0 <10 <10 <10 0.24 7 <10 <10 <10 0.30 14 <10 <10 <10 1.48 24 <10 <10 <10 1.64 27 <10 <10 <10 1.24 41 <10 <10 <10 0.34 2Bp20L SKO42 <0.7 <0.7 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 7 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 14 <10 <10 <10 <0.15 24 <10 <10 <10 0.18 27 <10 <10 <10 0.20 41 <10 <10 <10 0.15 RSV GROWTH AND IMMUNOGENICITY IN AFRICAN GREEN MONKEYS: RSV 2B CHALLENGE OF MONKEYS 8 WEEKS POST-VACCINATED WITH RSV 2B TS MUTANTS CHALLENGE VIRUS GROWTH IMMUNOGENICITY PEAK VIRUS TITER (log10 PFU/ml) NEUTRALIZATION TITERS EIA TITERS (x10 3 ) VACCINE VIRUS AGM NASAL LUNG DAY 2B A2 3A anti-F 2Bp33F SK034 5.7 5.0 0 <10 <10 <10 0.52 7 <10 <10 <10 0.91 14 451 10 472 303.84 21 6797 33 829 592.61 28 4353 50 815 135.85 42 1978 44 264 52.76 2Bp33F SKO28 <0.8 3.8 0 13 <10 <10 2.50 7 208 65 576 43.64 14 2868 443 2051 131.70 21 1883 404 2144 144.39 28 1127 227 2797 53.22 42 941 79 729 43.30 2Bp24G SK012 3.9 3.2 0 <10 <10 <10 21.58 7 281 111 323 258.89 14 604 431 731 551.49 21 698 298 692 668.50 28 357 325 985 189.81 42 272 82 895 104.16 2Bp24G SK030 <0.8 <0.7 0 91 <10 69 34.55 7 628 322 1120 174.07 14 1617 397 1953 203.58 21 1184 256 968 145.71 28 851 276 1313 49.28 42 637 48 329 27.36 2Bp20L SKO33 5.3 4.5 0 <10 <10 <10 1.75 7 <10 <10 <10 1.88 14 516 <10 325 289.94 21 500 22 550 418.91 28 783 56 525 148.25 42 518 48 442 91.39 2Bp20L SKO42 5.4 3.3 0 <10 <10 <10 0.21 7 <10 <10 <10 0.22 14 36 <10 116 135.80 21 213 21 284 116.99 28 256 30 300 30.06 42 516 40 289 19.30 Control SKO46 5.9 4.7 0 <10 <10 <10 0.10 7 <10 <10 <10 0.13 14 272 50 594 275.33 21 488 98 1140 587.93 28 1377 75 1393 190.49 42 1659 47 573 183.97 Control 032B 5.5 3.9 0 <10 <10 <10 0.25 7 <10 <10 <10 0.24 14 2462 201 3458 626.57 21 1546 303 1279 482.31 28 1162 104 1729 164.53 42 1044 83 689 75.1 RSV GROWTH AND IMMUNOGENICITY IN AFRICAN GREEN MONKEYS: RSV 3A TS MUTANTS VIRUS GROWTH IMMUNOGENICITY PEAK VIRUS TITER (log10 PFU/ml) NEUTRALIZATION TITERS EIA-F TITERS (x103) VIRUS AGM NASAL LUNG DAY 2B A2 3A 3Ap20E 01128 1.7 1.3 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 7 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 14 <10 <10 <10 3.72 21 38 <10 39 23.12 28 21 <10 13 27.42 40 14 <10 <10 31.11 3Ap20E 0L1161 2.3 2.9 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 7 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 14 <10 <10 30 5.84 21 14 12 57 19.51 28 56 18 126 27.53 40 44 31 108 38.90 3Ap20F 90B037 3.2 <1.0 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 7 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 14 <10 <10 11 1.17 21 12 <10 47 34.32 28 20 17 86 31.58 40 49 26 123 35.05 3Ap20F 90B045 3.9 1.0 0 <10 <10 <10 0.35 7 <10 <10 <10 0.30 14 <10 <10 19 3.16 21 11 11 22 12.61 28 12 13 24 16.82 40 24 <10 39 14.92 3Ap28F 91B027 2.0 <0.8 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 7 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 14 <10 <10 <10 0.18 21 <10 <10 <10 1.29 28 <10 <10 <10 2.63 40 <10 <10 <10 3.44 3Ap28F 91B043 2.9 <0.9 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 7 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 14 <10 11 27 3.83 RSV GROWTH AND IMMUNOGENICITY IN AFRICAN GREEN MONKEYS: RSV 3A CHALLENGE OF MONKEYS 8 WEEKS POST-VACCINATED WITH RSV 3A TS MUTANTS CHALLENGE VIRUS GROWTH IMMUNOGENICITY VACCINE VIRUS PEAK VIRUS TITER (log 10 PFU/ml) NEUTRALIZATION TITERS EIA-F TITERS (x103) AGM NASAL LUNG DAY 2B A2 3A 3Ap20E 01128 1.4 0.7 0 14 12 <10 35.75 7 216 281 602 699.10 14 417 265 784 611.24 21 289 307 573 247.16 28 263 289 731 463.57 42 145 14 426 285.47 3Ap20E 0L1161 2.2 <0.8 0 21 <10 56 25.37 7 526 412 2735 535.05 14 S16 521 2382 252.93 21 581 473 1840 275.32 28 478 437 1651 244.01 42 250 239 753 141.33 3Ap20F 90B03 <1.1 <0.8 0 84 56 221 41.17 7 2374 2093 6051 435.25 14 3701 2916 8652 450.55 21 2933 2224 6461 481.99 28 1849 1588 4031 287.28 42 3086 967 3950 207.98 3Ap20F 90B045 <1.0 <0.8 0 24 12 56 13.44 7 644 627 1381 182.99 14 1024 549 2174 223.70 21 1835 699 2130 273.87 28 831 318 1499 177.21 42 534 258 1073 127.80 3Ap28F 91B027 <1.0 0.8 0 <10 <10 <10 5.50 7 408 229 521 150.97 14 585 560 2016 234.25 21 449 311 1161 359.53 28 316 400 714 184.91 42 242 217 436 142.67 Control 91K041 5.0 4.7 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 7 <10 <10 <10 0.13 14 19 <10 205 213.29 21 106 33 423 602.54 28 123 99 278 562.05 42 107 80 257 252.99 Control 91K059 5.1 4.6 0 <10 <10 <10 <0.05 7 <10 <10 <1C 0.09 14 27 34 384 166.59 21 288 158 1259 268.47 28 <160 <160 575. 286.52 42 290 178 1448 218.74 REFERENCES Anderson JJ, Norden J, Saunders D, Toms GL, Scott R (1990): Analysis of the local and systemic immune responses induced in BALB/c mice by experimental respiratory syncytial virus infection. Journal of General Virology 71:1561-1570. Anderson LJ, Hierholzer JC, Tsou C, Hendry RM, Fernie BF, Stone Y, McIntosh K (1985): Antigenic characterization of respiratory syncytial virus strains with monoclonal antibodies. Journal of Infectious Diseases 151:626-633. Anderson LJ, Hendry RM, Pierik LT, Tsou C, McIntosh K (1991): Multicenter study of strains of respiratory syncytial virus. Journal of Infectious Diseases 163:687-692. Akerlind B, Norrby E, Orvell C, Mufson MA (1988): Respiratory syncytial virus: Heterogeneity of subgroup B strains. Journal of General Virology 69:2145-2154. Beeler JA, Coelingh KW (1989): Neutralization epitopes of the F glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus: Effect of mutation upon fusion function. Journal of Virology 63:2941-2950. Belshe RB, Hissom FK (1982): Cold adaptation of parainfluenza virus type 3: Induction of three phenotypic markers. Journal of Medical Virology 10:235-242. Belshe RB, Van Voris LP, Mufson MA (1982): Parenteral administration of live respiratory syncytial virus vaccine: Results of a field trial. Journal of Infectious Diseases 145:311-319. Brideau RJ, Walters RR, Stier MA, Wathen MW (1989): Protection of cotton rats against human respiratory syncytial virus by vaccination with a novel chimeric FG glycoprotein. Journal of General Virology 70:2637-2644. Chin J, Magoffin RL, Shearer LA, Schieble JH, Lennette EH (1969): Field evaluation of a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine and a trivalent parainfluenza virus vaccine in a pediatric population. American Journal of Epidemiology 89:449-463. Clements ML, Belshe RB, King J, Newman F, Westblom TU, Tierney EL, London WT, Murphy BR (1991): Evaluation of Bovine, cold-adapted human, and wild-type human parainfluenza type 3 viruses in adult volunteers and in chimpanzees. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 29:1175-1182. Collins, PL (1991): The molecular biology of human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) of the genus Pneumovirus. In Kingsbury DW (ed): "The Paramyxoviruses". Plenum Publishing Corporation, pp103-162. Collins PL, Prince GA, Camargo E, Purcell RH, Chanock RM, Murphy BR, Davis AR, Lubeck MD, Mizutani S, Hung PP (1990): Evaluation of the protective efficacy of recombinant vaccinia viruses and adenoviruses that express respiratory syncytial virus glycoproteins.In "Vaccines 90", Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp79-84. Collins PL, Purcell RH, London WT, Lawrence LA, Chanock RM, Murphy BR (1990): Evaluation in chimpanzees of vaccinia virus recombinants that express the surface glycoproteins of human respiratory syncytial virus. Vaccine 8:164-168. Connors M, Collins PL, Firestone CY, Murphy BR (1991): Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) F, G, M2 (22K), and N proteins each induce resistance to RSV challenge, but resistance induced by M2 and N proteins is relatively short-lived. Journal of Virology 65:1634-1637. Duffy, JI, Vaccine Preparation Techniques, Noyes Data Corporation (1980). Edwards KM, King JC, Steinhoff MC, Thompson J, Clements ML, Wright PF, Murphy BR (1991): Safety and immunogenicity of live attenuated cold-adapted influenza B/Ann Arbor/1/86 reassortant virus vaccine in infants and children. Journal of Infectious Diseases 163:740-745. Forsyth BR, Phillips CA (1973): Laboratory and antigenic studies of respiratory syncytial virus; evaluation of respiratory syncytial, meningococcal, and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines. NIH contract report number IDB-VDP-07-067. Frickey PH (1969): Markers differentiating a "cold" variant of respiratory syncytial virus from its parent line. Internal report - Lederle Laboratories. Friedewald WT, Forsyth BR, Smith CB, Gharpure MA, Chanock RM (1968): Low-temperature-grown RS virus in adult volunteers. Journal of the American Medical Association 204:690-694. Fulginiti VA, Eller JJ, Sieber OF, Joyner JW, Minamitani M, Meiklejohn G (1969): I. A field trial of two inactivated respiratory virus vaccines; an aqueous trivalent parainfluenza virus vaccine and an alum-precipitated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. American Journal of Epidemiology 89:435-448. Gharpure MA, Wright PF, Chanock RM (1969): Temperature-sensitive mutants of respiratory syncytial virus. Journal of Virology 3:414-421. Glezen WP, Paredes A, Allison JE, Taber LH, Frank AL (1981): Risk of respiratory syncytial virus infection for infants from low-income families in relationship to age, sex, ethnic group, and maternal antibody level. Journal of Pediatrics 98:706-715. Glezen WP, Taber LH, Frank AL, Kasel JA (1986): Risk of primary infection and reinfection with respiratory syncytial virus. American Journal of Diseases of Children 140:543-546. Graham BS, Bunton LA, Wright PF, Karzon DT (1991): Role of T lymphocyte subsets in the pathogenesis of primary infection and rechallenge with respiratory syncytial virus in mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation 88:1026-1033. Hall CB, McBride JT (1991): Respiratory syncytial virus - from chimps with colds to conundrums and cures. New England Journal of Medicine 325:57-58. Hall CB, Walsh EE, Long CE, Schnabel KC (1991): Immunity to and frequency of reinfection with respiratory syncytial virus. Journal of Infectious Diseases 163:693-698. Henderson FW, Collier AM, Clyde WA, Denny FW (1979): Respiratory-syncytial-virus infections, reinfections and immunity; A prospective, longitudinal study in young children. New England Journal of Medicine 300:530-534. Hodes DS, Kim HW, Parrott RH, Camargo E, Chanock RM (1974): Genetic alteration in a temperature-sensitive mutant of respiratory syncytial virus after replication in vivo (37972). Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 145:1158-1164. Holland J, Spindler K, Horodyski F, Grabau E, Nichol S, Vandepol S (1982): Rapid evolution of RNA genomes. Science 215:1577-1585. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Issues and Priorities for New Vaccine Development (1985): Prospects for immunizing against respiratory syncytial virus. In "New vaccine development: establishing priorities, Vol: diseases of importance in the United States". Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp 397-409. Johnson PR, Olmsted RA, Prince GA, Murphy BR, Alling DW, Walsh EE, Collins PL (1987): Antigenic relatedness between glycoproteins of human respiratory syncytial virus subgroups A and B: Evaluation of the contributions of E and G glycoproteins to immunity. Journal of Virology 61: 3163-3166. Kapikian AZ, Mitchell RH, Chanock RM, Shvedoff RA, Stewart CE (1968): An epidemiologic study of altered clinical reactivity to respiratory syncytial (RS) virus infection in children previously vaccinated with an inactivated RS virus vaccine. American Journal of Epidemiology 89:405-421 Kasel JA, Walsh EE, Frank AL, Baxter BD, Taber LH, Glezen WP (1987/1988): Relation of serum antibody to glycoproteins of respiratory syncytial virus with immunity to infection in children. Viral Immunology 1:199-205. Kim HW, Canchola JG, Brandt CD, Pyles G, Chanock RM, Jensen K, Parrott RH (1969): Respiratory syncytial virus disease in infants despite prior administration of antigenic inactivated vaccine. American Journal of Epidemiology 89:422-434. Kim HW, Arrobio JO, Pyles G, Brandt CD, Camargo E, Chanock RM, Parrott RH (1971): Clinical and immunological response of infants and children to administration of low-temperature adapted respiratory syncytial virus. Pediatrics 48:745-755. Kim HW, Arrobio JO, Brandt CD, Wright P, Hodes D, Chanock RM, Parrott RH (1973): Safety and antigenicity of temperature sensitive (TS) mutant respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants and children. Pediatrics 52:56-63. Kim HW, Leikin SL, Arrobio J, Brandt CD, Chanock RM, Parrott RH (1976): Cell-mediated immunity to respiratory syncytial virus induced by inactivated vaccine or by infection. Pediatric Research 10:75-78. Lamprecht CL, Krause HE, Mufson MA (1976): Role of maternal antibody in pneumonia and bronchiolitis due to respiratory syncytial virus. Journal of Infectious Diseases 134:211-217. Maassab HF, DeBorde DC (1985): Development and characterization of cold-adapted viruses for use as live virus vaccines. Vaccine 3:355-369. Maassab HF, Heilman CA, Herlocher ML (1990): Cold-adapted influenza viruses for use as live vaccines for man, In "Viral Vaccines" Wiley-Liss, Inc. Maxam, AM. Gilbert, W. (1977): Anew method for sequencing DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 74:560. McIntosh K, Arbeter AM, Stahl MK, Orr IA, Hodes DS, Ellis EF (1974): Attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vaccines in asthmatic children. Pediatric Research 8:689-696. McIntosh K, Chanock RM (1990): Respiratory Syncytial Virus. In Fields BN, Knipe DM (eds):"Virology" New York: Raven Press, Ltd, pp1045-1072. McKay E, Higgins P, Tyrell D, Pringle C (1988): Immunogenicity and pathogenicity of temperature-sensitive modified respiratory syncytial virus in adult volunteers. Journal of Medical Virology 25:411-421. Mufson MA, Orvell C, Rafnar B, Norrby E (1985): Two distinct subtypes of human respiratory syncytial virus. Journal of General Virology 66:2111-2124. Mufson MA, Belshe RB, Orvell C, Norrby E (1987): Subgroup characteristics of respiratory syncytial virus strains recovered form children with two consecutive infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 25:1535-1539. Murphy BR, Walsh EE (1988): Formalin-inactivated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine induces antibodies to the fusion glycoprotein that are deficient in fusion-inhibiting activity. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 26:1595-1597. Murphy BR, Tierney EL, London WT, Belshe RB (1990): A cold-adapted mutant of human parainfluenza virus type 3 is attenuated and protective in chimpanzees. In "Vaccines 90" Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press pp 91-95. Nicholas JA, Rubino KL, Levely ME, Adams EG, Collins PL (1990): Cytolytic T-lymphocyte responses to respiratory syncytial virus: Effector cell phenotype and target proteins. Journal of Virology 64:4232-4241. Obrosova-Serova NP, Slepushkin AN, Kendal AP, Harmon MW, Burtseva EI, Bebesheva NI, Beljaev AL, Lonskaja NI, Medvedva TE, Egorov AY, Peklisove LV, Alexandrova GI (1990): Evaluation in children of cold-adapted influenza B live attenuated intranasal vaccine prepared by reassortment between wild-type B/Ann Arbor/1/86 and cold-adapted B/Leningrad/14/55 viruses. Vaccine 8:57-60. Olmsted RA, Buller RML, Collins PL, London WT, Beeler JA, Prince GA, Chanock RM, Murphy BR (1988): Evaluation in non-human primates of the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing the F or G glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus. Vaccine 6:519-524. Oppenshaw PJM, Anderson K, Wertz GW, Askonas BA (1990): The 22,000-kilodalton protein of respiratory syncytial virus is a major target for K d -restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes from mice primed by infection. Journal of Virology 64:1683-1689. Prince GA, Jenson AB, Hemming VG, Murphy BR, Walsh EE, Horswood RL, Chanock RM (1986): Enhancement of respiratory syncytial virus pulmonary pathology in cotton rats by prior intramuscular inoculation of formalin-inactivated virus. Journal of Virology 57:721-728. Richardson LS, Belshe RB, London WT, Sly DL, Prevar DA, Camargo E, Chanock RM (1978): Evaluation of five temperature-sensitive mutants of respiratory syncytial virus in primates: I. Viral shedding, immunologic response, and associated illness. Journal of Medical Virology 3:91-100. Sanger, F. Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977): DNA Sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. P.N.AS. 74 :5463-5467. Stott EJ, Taylor G, Ball LA, Anderson K, Young KKY, King AMQ, Wertz GW (1987): Immune and histopathological responses in animals vaccinated with recombinant vaccinia viruses that express individual genes of human respiratory syncytial virus. Journal of Virology 61:3855-3861. Sullender WM, Mufson MA, Anderson LJ, Wertz GW (1991): Genetic diversity of the attachment protein of subgroup B respiratory syncytial viruses. Journal of Virology 65:5425-5434. Sun CS, Wyde PR, Knight V (1983): Correlation of cytotoxic activity in lungs to recovery of normal and gamma-irradiated cotton rats from respiratory syncytial virus infection. American Review of Respiratory Diseases 128:668-672. Trudel M, Nadon F, Seguin C, Binz H (1991): Protection of BALB/c mice from respiratory syncytial virus infection by immunization with a synthetic peptide derived from the G glycoprotein. Virology 185:749-757. Trudel M, Stott EJ, Taylor G, Oth D, Mercier F, Nadon F, Seguin C, Simard C, Lacroix M (1991): Synthetic peptides corresponding to the F protein of RSV stimulate murine B and T cells but fail to confer protection. Archives of Virology 117:59-71. Wair, GW, "Preparation of Antigens and Principles of Immunization", in JJ Marchalonis and GW Warr, eds., Antibody as Tool - The Applications of Immunochemistry , pp 21-58, John Wiley & Sons (1982). Walsh EE, Hall CB, Briselli M, Brandriss MW, Schlesinger JJ (1987): Immunization with glycoprotein subunits of respiratory syncytial virus to protect cotton rats against viral infection. Journal of Infectious Diseases 155:1198-1204. Wathen MW, Kakuk TJ, Brideau RJ, Hausknecht EC, Cole SL, Zaya RM (1991): Vaccination of cotton rats with a chimeric FG glycoprotein of human respiratory syncytial virus induces minimal pulmonary pathology on challenge. Journal of Infectious Diseases 163:477-482. Watt PJ, Robinson BS, Pringle CR, Tyrell DAJ (1990): Determinants of susceptibility to challenge and the antibody response of adult volunteers given experimental respiratory syncytial virus vaccines. Vaccine 8:231-236. Wright PF, Woodend WG, Chanock RM (1970): Temperature-sensitive mutants of respiratory syncytial virus: In-vivo studies in hamsters. Journal of Infectious Diseases 122:501-512. Wright PF, Shinozaki T, Fleet W, Sell SH, Thompson J, Karzon DT (1976): Evaluation of a live, attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in infants. Journal of Pediatrics 88:931-936. Wright PF, Belshe RB, Kim HW, Van Voris LP, Chanock RM (1982): Administration of a highly attenuated, live respiratory syncytial virus vaccine to adults and children. Infection and Immunity 37:397-400.

Claims: A temperature sensitive, cold adapted mutant respiratory syncytial virus which is more attenuated in African green monkeys than the TS-1 respiratory syncytial virus mutant; wherein the mutant is derived from 3A or 2B strain of respiratory syncytial virus. A temperature sensitive, cold adapted mutant respiratory syncytial virus of Claim 1 which is of subgroup A. A temperature sensitive, cold adapted mutant respiratory syncytial virus of Claim 1 which is of subgroup B. A temperature sensitive, cold adapted mutant respiratory syncytial virus subgroup A of Claim 2, wherein the mutant virus is selected from the group consisting of 3Ap20E (ATCC, VR 2369) and 3Ap20F (ATCC, VR 2367). A temperature sensitive, cold adapted mutant respiratory syncytial virus subgroup B of Claim 3, wherein the mutant virus is selected from the group consisting of 2Bp33F (ATCC, VR 2364), 2Bp24G (ATCC, VR 2370), 2Bp20L (ATCC, VR 2368) and 2Bp34L (ATCC, VR 2365). A pharmaceutical composition comprising a temperature sensitive, cold adapted mutant respiratory syncytial virus which is more attenuated in African green monkeys than the TS-1 respiratory syncytial virus mutant, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier; wherein the mutant is derived from 3A or 2B strain of respiratory syncytial virus. A pharmaceutical composition for eliciting an immunogenic response to a respiratory syncytial virus in a mammal or human wherein the composition comprises a temperature sensitive, cold adapted mutant respiratory syncytial virus which is more attenuated in African green monkeys than the TS-1 respiratory syncytial virus mutant, wherein the mutant is derived from 3A or 2B strain of respiratory syncytial virus, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Use of the mutant according to any one of Claims 1 to 5 for the manufacture of a medicament for eliciting an immunogenic response in a human or mammal.

Inventors: CROWLEY JOAN COFLAN, RANDOLPH VALERIE BRUCE, CROWLEY, JOAN COFLAN, RANDOLPH, VALERIE BRUCE
Applicants: AMERICAN CYANAMID CO, AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
Application year: 1993
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: C12N15, C07K14, A61K39, A61K38, C12N7, A61P31