Rapid, improved immunoassays via the use of novel immune complex transfer techniques

Abstract: Inter alia , a method for increasing the sensitivity and accuracy of a binding assay conducted under sufficiently mild conditions characterised in that it comprises: (a) reacting the analyte with a labeled specific binder and with a specific binder, which has been reversibly attached directly or indirectly to a first solid phase, to form a labeled specific binder-analyte-specific binder-optional component-first solid phase complex; (b) separating the labeled specific binder-analyte and, in some cases, the specific binder from the optional component-first solid phase, to form a separated complex; (c) reattaching the separated complex to a second optional component attached to a second solid phase via either an epitope on the analyte or an epitope on the specific binder; and (d) determining the amount of the analyte present by measurement of the amount of the labeled specific binder attached to the second solid phase; separation (b) being completed in 10 minutes or less, is disclosed.

Description: Over the past 30 years, immunochemical assays have become increasingly widespread. The most sensitive type of immunoassay is the solid phase (heterogeneous) immunoassay. However, it is desirable to increase sensitivity even further in order to be able to detect analytes which are present in lower levels than is presently possible to detect and to be able to detect more accurately the concentrations of the analytes. Sensitivity of the solid phase immunoassay is limited by several factors, including non-specific binding (NSB) of the tracer to the solid phase. The NSB is a result of either direct adsorption of the tracer to the solid phase surface, or indirect adsorption, via binding to non-specific components of the assay mixture that are adsorbed to the surface of the solid phase. These non-specific components are at least partially different than the material to be assayed, but have affinity toward the tracer. The adsorption of the non-specific components can lead to decreased sensitivity and also to reduced accuracy. One way of reducing NSB is to use a process called immune complex transfer (ICT), which was pioneered by Ishikawa. (See Ishikawa et al, 185 Clinica Chimica Acta (1989) 223; also EP-A-303229; and Kohno et al, 22 Clin Biochem (1989) 277.) In a conventional heterogeneous immunoassay, the assayed material (analyte) is incubated ith a labeled specific binder (tracer) and an unlabeled, solid phase-immobilized specific binder. The incubation is followed by washing the solid phase to remove unreacted tracer, and measuring the signal associated with the ternary complex: solid phase-immobilized specific binder/analyte/labeled specific binder. This measurement is done in the presence of the solid phase, and therefore includes the NSB. On the other hand, in the ICT assay, the ternary complex is eluted off of the solid phase and is measured in the absence of the solid phase and its associated NSB. Since some of the NSB is eluted as well, it is preferable to include in the ICT process a step in which the labeled complex is selectively recaptured with a new solid phase. This results in increased signal to noise ratio and higher assay sensitivity. The ICT process requires elution of the immune complex under mild conditions, i.e. without breaking the bond formed between the analyte and the specific labeled binder. Also, the elution medium and elution conditions should not interfere with the recapture step. Ishikawa et al overcame this difficulty by constructing an immunochemical, reversible bridge between the solid phase specific binder and the solid phase, rather than employing the usual permanent attachment. They permanently immobilized to the solid phase an antibody against dinitrophenyl residues (anti-DNP), separately attached to the specific binder dinitrophenyl residues and then combined the two reagents to form a solid phase-immobilized specific binder. This provided a reversible immunochemical bond that could be broken by addition of excess dinitrophenyl-lysine (DNP-lys). Although the use of solid phase immobilized anti-DNP/dinitrophenylated specific binder as the solid phase reagent by Ishikawa et al successfully reduced NSB, the method has two drawbacks: the major difficulty is the lengthy incubation with DNP-lys required for the elution step. Reducing the incubation time of this step is highly desirable in order to both obtain a quicker assay result and to minimized loss of sensitivity due to the time-dependent dissociation of the bond between the analyte and the labelled specific binder. A second difficulty is the added complexity, expense and instability associated with constructing the immunochemical bridge. This invention relates to methods that have been bound useful in reducing non-specific binding in immunochemical assays, via methods that can be implemented much faster than those used by Ishikawa. The techniques include the use of a lipophilic bridge, such as a liposome, or the elution of the antigen-antibody complex from the solid phase by the use of an anti-idiotypic antibody or an antibody, or the use of a heterologous reversible bridge. In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method for increasing the sensitivity and accuracy of a binding assay conducted under sufficiently mild conditions characterised in that it comprises: (a) reacting the analyte with a labelled specific binder and with a specific binder, which has been reversibly attached directly or indirectly to a first solid phase via a heterologous bridge or a lipophilic bridge to form a labelled specific binder-analyte-specific binder-optional component-first solid phase complex; (b) separatinq the labelled specific binder-analyte and, in some cases, the specific binder from the optional component-first solid phase, to form a separated complex; (c) reattaching the separated complex to a second optional component attached to a second solid phase via either an epitope on the analyte or an epitope on the specific binder; and (d) determining the amount of the analyte present by measurement of the amount of the labelled specific binder attached to the second solid phase; separation (b) being completed in 10 minutes or less. In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method for increasing the sensitivity and accuracy of an immunochemical assay characterised in that it comprises: (a) reacting the analyte with a labelled specific binder and with a specific binder which has been attached to a first solid phase, to form a labelled specific binder-analyte-specific binder-first solid phase complex; (b) separating the labelled specific binder-analyte complex from the first solid phase by the use of an anti-idiotype specific binder, a partial analyte mimic, or a fragment derived from one of these; (c) reattaching the specific binder-analyte complex to a second specific binder, which binds to the analyte or another component of the immune complex and which is attached to a second solid phase; and (d) determining the amount of the analyte present by measurement of the amount of the labelled specific binder attached to the second solid phase. Having indicated the scope of the present invention, it will now be further described and illustrated in more general terms. Immune complex transfer (ICT) is a technique first used by Ishikawa for reducing non-specific binding (NSB) in immunoassays. The fluctuations of the NSB constitute background noise, which, if eliminated or reduced, would increase signal to noise ratio and, therefore, increase sensitivity, allowing the detection of much lower concentration of analyte. Since the method of elution of the immune complex used by Ishikawa et al is slow (1-4 hours) and cumbersome, the three novel ICT systems which have been developed in the present invention represent a significant improvement. Throughout this discussion of ICT (including the examples), although there are mostly references to cases in which the analyte is an antigen, it should be noted that the description also applies to cases where the analyte is an antibody. When the analyte is an antigen, both of the specific binders are antibodies, and when the analyte is an antibody, both of the specific binders may be antigens (or an antigen mimic, such an antiidiotype or a genetically engineered antigen) or one specific binder is an antigen and the other is an antibody. This is due to the fact that the primary intention here is to discuss ICT reaction schemes, and there is little difference in whether the analyte is an antigen or an antibody. We shall use the term "specific binder" to refer to both antigen and antibody, and it should be noted that "binding partner" is also used in the literature as a synonym for "specific binder". Several terms used throughout this patent will be defined in order to make their meaning clear. (1) Heterologous means an antigen which is used to react with an antibody, wherein the antigen is not the same antigen as that used to create the antibody. Thus, even though the heterologous antigen has some chemical similarity to the original antigen, it has lower affinity to the antibody. (2) Antiidiotypic antibody is an antibody formed to a second antibody, at or very near to the binding site of the second antibody. (3) Immune complex is the entity which is dissociated from one solid phase and reconnected to a second solid phase in the purification scheme which is the subject of this invention. As can be seen from the discussion herein, the immune complex in some cases consists of the analyte to which at least one specific binder containing a label is attached. In other cases, the immune complex additionally consists of a second specific binder attached to the analyte. The species moving from one solid phase to the other is referred to as the separated complex. Furthermore, all of the examples discussed herein demonstrate the reattachment to the second solid phase via the analyte. However, the reattachment to the second solid phase could also occur via another component of the immune complex. Other variations of the composition of the immune complex and the method in which it becomes attached to the solid phases will be apparent to those skilled in the art. (4) Accuracy means the reduction of systematic error caused by interferences. (5) Sensitivity refers to the ability to detect low levels of an analyte. Furthermore, due to the presence of several options, it is possible to use several ICT cycles, each using a different chemistry or different method, to reduce the NSB even further. For example, one could use a lipophilic bridge during the first cycle, releasing and then recapturing on a heterologous solid phase, releasing and recapturing again, etc. The solid phase reagent comprises an antibody (or, in some cases, an antigen) immobilized on insoluble particles (also referred to as the solid phase), such as paramagnetic particles, in order to aid in the separation of the antigen-antibody complex that is formed. Other insoluble matrices, such as glass beads, plastic reaction wells, etc. are also presumed to be acceptable. The reaction scheme also involves the use of a label, such as a radioactive label, chemiluminescent label, enzyme linked immunoassay label, etc. The type of label used is not critical to our discussion. Many label systems are known in the art at present, and many new ones will undoubtedly be discovered in the future. Unless otherwise specifically stated, all label systems are presumed to be acceptable. The discussion also refers to techniques well-known in the art, such as the reaction of small molecules to larger ones in order to generate a molecule which is large enough to elicit antibodies. Details of these techniques are not presented here and are presumed to be familiar to those knowledgeable in the art. This technique is useful not just for immunochemical assays but also for many other binding assays, for example, for receptor assays and lectin assays. (In these cases, specific binder would refer to receptor or to lectin and other definitional and related changes would be necessary.) However, this technique cannot be used for gene probe assays unless the harsh conditions under which they are conducted are eliminated. Additional alternatives can be used with the novel procedures. For example, if there is difficulty in using MNP-anti DNP as the complexing pair in the heterologous immunochemical bridge method, it is possible to use other binding pairs, such as iminobiotin-avidin. Another alternative includes the presence of optional components, e.g. lipophilic materials, such as liposomes, between the analyte and the solid phase. In some cases, portions of this optional component are removed along with the analyte when it is being eluted from the first solid phase and reattached to the second solid phase. Other alternatives will become apparent to those with knowledge in this area. One of the new techniques, the use of anti-idiotypes, eliminates a further disadvantage encountered in using the Ishikawa method, i.e., the requirement of using secondary antibodies. In the antiidiotype procedure, the primary antibody is immobilized on the solid phase, thus requiring less labor to prepare, and it has been found to be more stable. The benefits found in the novel system were unexpected. In a conventional immunoassay, the immobilized (unlabeled) antibody needs to be firmly attached to the solid phase or else it will dissociate while running the assay or during storage of the product. The problems encountered during the running of the assay have been most noticeable in the past during the wash steps, while the problems encountered during storage of the products have limited their commercial viability. The firm attachment found in Ishikawa's DNP system appears to be responsible for the slow release that was found. The novel systems provide fast release and, at the same time, an attachment that is firm enough to allow for a functional assay. Three novel ICT systems have been developed. These systems are improvements over past techniques in that they are faster (less than 1 minute up to 30 minutes) and in some cases less complex (easier to produce reagents). Each system will be illustrated by a reaction system utilizing the novel principle. However, the examples used to illustrate the systems should not be considered to limit the usefulness or breadth of the ICT systems. In the heterologous bridge system, an anti-hapten, such as an anti-DNP, is permanently immobilized on the solid phase. To the specific binder, instead of attaching the homologous hapten (DNP), a heterologous hapten, such as mononitrophenyl residue (MNP) or trinitrophenyl residue (TNP), is attached. This heterologous immunochemical bridge was surprisingly found to be stable enough to serve as an immunoassay reagent, but when excess DNP-lys is added, it is broken much faster than the homologous bridge. See the reaction scheme below and the detailed description of the assay in Example 1. Reaction scheme of Method 1 involving a heterologous immunochemical bridge Reagents for assay of CKMB (MB isoenzyme form of creatine kinase) : 1. First solid phase - Anti-CKMM (antibody to CKMM, MM isoenzyme form of creatine kinase) is derivatized with MNP, which binds to anti-DNP on paramagnetic particles. The bond between anti-DNP and MNP is reversible. 2. Tracer - Anti-CKMB (antibody to CKMB) is derivatized with acridinium ester as a chemiluminescent label. 3. Second solid phase - Anti-CKBB (antibody to CKBB, BB isoenzyme form of creatine kinase) immobilized on paramagnetic particles. Assay procedure: a. First solid phase, analyte CKMB and tracer are incubated to form the immune complex on the solid phase. See FIG. 1. (Note that several abbreviations are used in the figures. S.P. refers to solid phase; M/B refers to CK MB, where CK is creatine kinase; DNP refers to dinitrophenol or dinitrophenyl; MNP refers to mononitrophenol; AE refers to acridinium ester.) b. The immune complex is eluted from the first solid phase by incubation for 10 min with DNP-lys. The immune complex can be either separated from the first solid phase (e.g., transferred from the first test tube) or, alternatively, the second solid phase can be added to the first test tube, provided that the two solid phases can be later separated from each other, for example, if one particle has magnetic properties or differs in some other physical property from the first particle. See FIG. 2. c. The eluted immune complex is recaptured by the second solid phase and read in a luminometer. See FIG. 3. Aside from the illustration shown above for the heterologous scheme, it is possible to vary the system considerably, for example using markers aside from luminescent markers and other variations which are apparent to those with expertise in the art. In the antiidiotype system, the solid phase-immobilized specific binder can be permanently immobilized on the solid phase as in a conventional assay, thus obviating the need for constructing a reversible bridge. Elution of the immune complex is done by addition of excess of an antibody against the analyte or an antiidiotypic antibody or a partial analyte mimic or a fragment derived from them. (A partial analyte mimic is a substance that contains a sufficient portion of the epitope of the analyte such that it can compete with the analyte for binding sites on the unlabeled antibody and, as such, cause the analyte to separate from the unlabeled antibody.) Previous attempts toward this end were done using adding a solution of an antibody identical to the one immobilized on the solid phase. These attempts showed that due to the strength of the interaction between the solid phase-immobilized antibody, displacement by a competing antibody is very slow, in the order of several hours or days. Applicants have found that, with some rare combinations of antibody/antigen pairs, it is possible to obtain considerable elution within 30 minutes incubation. Even more surprising was the applicants' finding that an antiidiotypic antibody of the immobilized antibody is faster and more efficient as an eluting agent. An additional surprising finding was that, if instead of adding an antibody that is identical to the immobilized one, a closely related antibody is added, elution is faster. In addition, this system is easy to manufacture, since there is no need to construct a reversible bridge between the antibody to the analyte and the solid phase. (See reaction scheme below and the detailed description in Example 2.) Reaction scheme for Method 2 involving elution with an antiidiotype Reagents for assay of CKMB: 1. First solid phase - Anti-CKBB immobilized on paramagnetic particles. 2. Tracer - Anti-CKMB labeled with acridinium ester. 3. Second solid phase - Anti-CKMM immobilized on paramagnetic particles. Assay procedure: a. First solid phase, analyte CKMB and tracer are incubated to form the immune complex on the first solid phase. See FIG. 4. b. The immune complex is eluted from the first solid phase by incubation for 30 min with antiidiotypic antibody (anti-anti-CKBB). See FIG. 5. c. The eluted immune complex is recaptured by the second solid phase and read in a luminometer. See FIG. 6. A third type of bridge system developed in the present invention involves a lipophilic bridge. Aggregates of lipophilic compounds, such as liposomes, lipoproteins, emulsions, hexagonal phases, micelles, bilayers and monolayers of certain compositions can be dispersed within seconds by detergents or certain enzymes. The use of a liposome or another lipophilic material as a bridge between the solid phase and the specific binder provides a stable attachment during the assay. Elution of the immune complex can then be rapidly obtained by addition of detergent. As an example, the reaction scheme of a system using liposomes is shown below, and detailed results using a liposome bridge is described in Example 3. Reaction scheme for Method 3 involving a liposomal bridge Reagents for an assay of CKMB: 1. First solid phase - Anti-CKMM and DNP residues are covalently attached to liposomes. The liposomes are immunochemically bound to anti-DNP on paramagnetic particles. 2. Tracer - Anti-CKMB labeled with acridinium ester. 3. Second solid phase - Anti-CKBB immobilized on paramagnetic particles. Assay procedure: a. First solid phase, analyte CKMB and tracer are incubated to form the immune complex on the solid phase. See FIG. 7. b. The immune complex is eluted from the first solid phase by incubation for 1 min with 0.1% Triton (Registered Trade Mark) X-100 detergent. (The elution was actually completed within a few seconds, but, because the assay was conducted manually, it was not possible to terminate this step in any less than one minute.) See FIG. 8. c. The eluted immune complex is recaptured by the second solid phase and read in a luminometer. See FIG. 9. The following are provided to exemplify the application of the above development but are not intended to limit its usefulness. Example 1 Heterologous bridge a. Preparation of monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies were produced in mice (strain A/J) by immunizations and subsequent fusions of the splenocytes with Sp2/0-Ag 14 myeloma cells by the procedure described by Kohler and Milstein in Nature (London) Vol. 256, pp. 494-497 (1975). Hybridoma cell secreting the desired antibodies were injected intraperitoneally into pristane-primed mice (strain CAF). Ascitic fluid from these mice was collected after 3-5 weeks. The antibodies were purified from the ascitic fluids by Protein A column chromatography using Affi-gel (Registered Trade Mark) Protein A MAPS II Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA 94801) according to the written protocol provided with the kit. The monoclonal antibodies against 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) were prepared by immunization with bovine serum albumin (BSA)-conjugated DNP. Preparation of monoclonals against creatine kinase isoenzymes MM, BB and MB was described by Piran et al. in Clinical Chemistry Vol. 33 pp. 1517-1520 (1987). b. Immobilization of antibodies on paramagnetic particles. Paramagnetic particles (PMP) were purchased from Advanced Magnetics, Inc. They were then activated by glutaraldehyde and conjugated to the various antibodies by the two-step glytaraldehyde procedure as described by Groman, E.V. et al. in BioTechniques, Vol. 3, pp. 156 (1985). c. conjugation of labels of haptens to proteins. Antibodies were labeled with acridinium ester (AE) as follows: 250 µg antibody in 0.1M sodium phosphate, 0.15M sodium chloride, pH 8.0, was mixed with 50 µl of 2',6',-2',6',-dimethyl-4'- (N-succinimidylcarbonyl)phenyl acridine-9-carboxylate (0.4 mg/ml) in dimethylformamide and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. 0.5 ml of a 10 mg/ml solution of DL-lysine was added to the mixture and the mixture was purified by gel filtration through a 10 ml column of Sephadex (Registered Trade Mark) G-25. The labeled antibody appeared at the void volume of the column and was collected. Other small molecules were conjugated to antibodies in a similar procedure. Dinitrophenol (DNP) was conjugated using N-hydroxsuccinimide- activated N-2,4-dinitrophenyl-b-alanine, mononitrophenol (MNP) was conjugated using N-hydroxsuccinamide- activated N-4-nitrophenol-b-alanine. d. Release of Conjugated Antibodies from Solid Phase Particles. DNP and MNP were conjugated to a monoclonal antibody against creatine kinase-MM (CKMM) using various ratios of small molecule to antibody. The number of DNP and MNP molecules per antibody molecule was determined spectrophotometrically. Each conjugated antibody was radiolabeled with Iodine 125 using the Iodogen method. Samples of each conjugate were incubated with a monoclonal antibody against DNP covalently coupled to PMP. After one hour incubation at room temperature, the PMP's were magnetically separated by a magnetic separation rack (Ciba Corning Diagnostics Corp., Medfield, MA), washed with lml water and resuspended with a solution of 5mM DNP-lysine. After 10 minutes incubation at room temperature with the DNP-lysine samples were magnetically separated and washed again, followed by counting in a gamma counter to determine the extent of displacement that had been achieved with the DNP-lysine solution. The results are shown in the following tabulation: Small Molecule # per Antibody Percent Released in 10 min DNP 6 10.6 DNP 12 3.2 MNP 8 73.1 MNP 14 65.3 MNP 24 85.1 e. Immunoassay for CKMB with a heterologous bridge. An anti-CKMM solid phase is formed by covalently coupling anti-DNP monoclonal antibody to PMP and then mixing this PMP with a MNP-derivatized mononclonal antibody against CKMM. After a one hour incubation period during which the conjugated anti-CKMM monoclonal antibody binds to the anti-DNP solid phase, the solid phase is magnetically separated and washed. A series of standards, controls and patient serum samples (0.1 ml each) are incubated for 30 minutes with this solid phase plus AE-labeled mononclonal anti-CKMB, in PBS/BSA buffer (50mM sodium phosphate, 150mM sodium chloride, 0.1% NaN3, 1mM ethelenediaminetetraacetic acid, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4). The reaction mixtures are then magnetically separated, washed to remove unbound AE-labeled antibody. The PMP-bound immune complexes are then mixed with 0.25 ml solution of 5mM DNP-lysine, which initiates the release of the immune complexes from the solid phase by displacing the MNP conjugated antibody from the immobilized anti-DNP. After 10 minutes of the release step, the test tubes are placed on the magnetic separation rack for 3 minutes to magnetically separate the solid phase, and 0.2 ml of the supernatant, containing the released labeled immune complexes are aspirated and combined with a new solid phase consisting of PMP-immobilized anti-CKBB monoclonal antibody. Following capture of the AE-containing immune complex by the PMP-anti-CKBB the incubation mixture is magnetically separated, washed and the AE label is measured in a luminometer (Magic Lite Analyzer, Ciba Corning Diagnostics Corp. Medfield, MA). Example 2 Antibodies and antiidiotypes: a. Preparation of monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies against creatine kinase isoenzymes and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) were prepared by immunizing mice with purified human creatine kinase isoenzymes and human TSH as described in Example 1, section a. The antibodies were labeled with AE or immobilized on PMP as described in Example 1, sections b and c. Anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody against anti-CKBB(CA8) was prepared as follows: Immunogen preparation: anti-CKBB monoclonal(CA8) was purified from ascites fluid by Protein A chromatography. The purified antibody was digested with pepsin to produce F(ab)'2 fragments. F(ab)'2 fragments were coupled to Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin(KLH) using heterobifunctional cross-linker SPDP (Pierce Chemical Company, Rockford, IL).Immunizations: A/J mice were immunized 3 times with 100µg of F(ab)'2-KLH intraperitoneally. The first injection was in Complete Freund's Adjuvant. Subsequent immunizations were in Incomplete Freund's Adjuvant. Four days prior to the fusion, mice were immunized with 10µg of antigen intravenously.Cell fusion: Spleen cells from immunized mice were fused with SP2/O myeloma cells at a ratio of 5:1 according to protocol described by Kohler and Milstein in Nature (London) Vol. 256, pp. 494-497 (1975). Cell culture supernatants were screened for antibody production 7-21 days post fusion, when macroscopic colonies were observed. Positive cell lines, screened by method described below, were cloned by limiting cell dilution.Screening procedure: F(ab) fragments were prepared by papain digestion of anti-CKBB(CA8), followed by purification on Protein A column. F(ab) fragments, at 10µg/ml in PBS were adsorbed onto polystyrene tubes overnight at room temperature. Tubes were then washed and blocked with 1% BSA in PBS. Purified Protein A was labelled with AE.Assay: Supernatants were incubated in F(ab) coated tubes for one hour at room temperature and then washed with water. AE-labeled Protein A was added to each tube. The incubation was continued for one hour at room temperature. Tubes were then washed and read in the luminometer. Supernatants giving a signal 10 times higher than background were considered positive and selected for further characterization.Specificity testing: Anti-idiotypic monoclonals were tested for specificity in two ways. Coated tubes were made using two different monoclonals other than CA8, and anti-idiotypes were tested for binding in the Protein A assay described above. Anti-idiotypic monoclonals were positive on CA8 F(ab)s and negative on other F(ab)s.Anti-idiotypic monoclonals were also shown to inhibit the binding of CA8 anti-CKBB Mab to AE-labeled CKBB. b. Testing antibodies for ability to release immune complexes. (1) CKMB assay. Various monoclonal antibodies against CKMM, CKBB, CKMB and TSH were tested to determine whether they could release the labelled complex AE-anti-MB-CKMB bound immunochemically to PMP-immobilized anti-CKBB. 100µl serum standard containing either 0 or 45 ng/ml CKMB were incubated with 100µl AE-anti-CKMB, input chemiluminescence 10 million relative light units (RLU's) and 500µl PMP-immobilized anti-BB(CA8) for 1 hour. The solid phases were magnetically separated and washed 2 times with deionized water. The PMP was then incubated with 0.25 ml PBS/BSA buffer (see Example 1 section e) containing 45 µg antibody for 30 minutes. The solid phases were separated and washed again and the remaining chemiluminescence was measured in the luminometer. The results are shown below: Antibody RLU's Bound buffer control (no antibody) zero CKMB 2609 45 ng/ml CKMB 212799 Anti-BB(CA8) 0 2068 45 116045 Antiidiotype anti-anti-CKBB(CA8) 0 2513 45 70182 Anti-CKMM(13F10) 0 2232 45 229994 Anti-CKBB(12A1) 0 2026 45 135814 Anti-CKBB(5G12) 0 1947 45 198648 Anti-CKBB(2D12) 0 1901 45 153813 Anti-CKBB(8A2) 0 2125 45 148833 Anti-CKMM(HH3) 0 1922 45 219011 Anti-CKMM(GBB) 0 1919 45 226448 Anti-CKMM(H44) 0 1862 45 216669 Anti-TSH(2C10) 0 2043 45 225031 Anti-CKMB(007) 0 2100 45 195705 Thus, specific and rapid release can be achieved by incubation with an antibody which is identical to the immobilized antibody (CA8) and to a lesser extent closely related anti-CKBB antibodies. Surprisingly, the antiidiotype (anti-CA8) was a more effective releasing agent than CA8 itself. (2) TSH assay. Monoclonal antibodies against TSH, polyclonal anti-TSH, and monoclonals against CKMM and CKBB were tested to determine whether they could release AE labelled anti-TSH bound TSH complex from PMP-immobilized anti-TSH(2C10). 100µl serum standard containing 0 or 6 µIU/L TSH were incubated with 100µl AE-labeled anti-TSH(E21), 3.5 million RLU's total input label, for 2 hours. 500µl of PMP-immobilized anti-TSH(2C10) was then added and incubated 30min to form sandwich complex. The solid phase was magnetically separated and washed 2 times with deionized water.Bound complex was then released by the incubation with 0.25 ml PBS/BSA containing 50 µg antibody for 30 minutes. The solid phases were separated, and washed 1 time with distilled water and the amount of AE-anti-TSH(2C10)-TSH complex remaining bound to the PMP was then measured in the luminometer. Releasing Antibody RLU's Bound Buffer control (no antibody) 0 TSH 1000 6 µIU/L TSH 130581 Anti-TSH(2C10) 0 1000 6 110702 Polyclonal Anti-TSH 0 1000 6 117594 Anti-TSH(E21) 0 1000 6 129175 Anti-TSH(7A10) 0 6 61624 Anti-TSH(11A8) 0 1000 6 128003 Anti-CKBB(CA8) 0 1000 6 132233 Antiidiotype anti-anti-CKBB(CA8) 0 1000 6 131026 Anti-CKMM(13F10) 0 1000 6 129680 Thus, addition of excess solution-phase capture antibody did not release appreciable amount of complex within the incubation time, but surprisingly, another anti-TSH(7A10) did. c. CKMB immune complex transfer assay employing antiidiotype anti-anti-CKBB(CA8) or anti-CKBB as releasing agents. 100µl CKMB standards were incubated with 100µl AE-anti-MB(007) as a tracer (total counts 100 million RLU's) and 500µl PMP-anti-BB(CA8) for 1 hour at room temperature. The solid phases were separated and washed 2 times with lml deionized water. Anti-CKBB(CA8) or antiidiotype anti-CKBB(CA8), 10 µg in 0.25 ml PBS/BSA was added to the PMP's to release the labeled complexes from solid phase. The PMP were mixed and then incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. They were then placed on the magnetic rack to magnetically separate the solid phase, and 0.2 ml of each supernatant was mixed with 500µl of PMP-anti-CKMM(AH6). After 15 minutes incubation at room temperature the PMP's were separated, washed 1 time with deionized water and read in a luminometer.The following tabulation shows the signal obtained for each CKMB serum standard in the assays involving release by anti-CKBB and the antiidiotypic antibody. Release by anti-CKBB Release by antiidiotype RLU CKMB ng/ml RLU 690 0.00 640 2595 0.45 2403 10025 4.50 10196 181318 45.00 155180 Example 3 Liposome Bridge a. Preparation of the capture antibody anti-CKMM(13F10) immobilized on PMP via a liposomal bridge. (1) Preparation of liposomes bearing dinitrophenyl groups. Liposomes were prepared from a mixture of 85.5µmol dioleoyl phosphatidyl choline, 7.35 µmol dioleoyl phosphatidyl glycerol, 1.0µmol- dinitrophenyl-amineocaproic-dioleoyl phophatidylethanolamine (all from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc., Birmingham, Alabama) and 4.0 µmol N-[4-(p-maleimidophenyl) butyryl]phophatidlethanolamine (prepared as described by Martin, J.F. and Papahadjopoulos, D. 257 J. Biol. Chem. (1982) 286). The lipids were dissolved in 3 ml chloroform in a small, clean petri dish. Chloroform was evaporated and the dry lipid mixture film was further lyophilized overnight in a desiccator under vacuum. The lipids were then hydrated with 10 ml of 2.7% v/v glycerol, lmM EDTA at pH 6.1 at room temperature to form large oligolamellar liposomes. These were extruded through polycarbonate membranes with pore diameters of 0.8, 0.6, 0.4 and 0.2 µm (Nucleopore) to form uniform vesicles. 10ml PBS was added, and the liposomes were sedimented by ultracentrifugation and resuspended to 6ml PBS to a final concentration of 16.67 µmol phospholipid per ml. (2) Preparation of liposome-coupled anti-CKMM. Monoclonal anti-CKMM (13F10) was purified and dialyzed overnight against a buffer consisting of 50mM acetic acid, 50mM sodium phosphate, 5mM EDTA and 50mM sodium chloride at pH 6.1. Two ml of antibody solution (2.5 mg) was made 20mM with respect to dithiothreitol and incubated 30 minutes at room temperature. The reduced antibody was then separated from excess dithiothreitol by gel filtration with 10 ml Sephadex (Registered Trade Mark) G-25 column in PBS. Liposomes were coupled to this antibody by mixing 5 mg antibody with 25 µmol phosphatidyl cholin. After 16 hour incubation at room temperature the liposome solution was washed 3x in 4 mls of PBS by ultracentrifugation. Finally the liposomes were resuspended in 2.5 mls of PBS. (3) Binding of dinitrophenylated, antibody-bearing liposomes to PMP-immobilized anti-DNP. The liposomes prepared as described in section (3) were bound to PMP-immobilized anti-DNP by incubating 10 mg PMP with 10 µmol phosphatidyl cholin for 16 hours in 2 ml PBS at room temperature. The liposome-PMP mixture was then washed in equal volumes of PBS with .1% BSA to remove unbound liposomes and then resuspended to 100µg PMP per ml of PBS/BSA for use in assay. b. CKMB immune complex transfer assay. CKMB serum standards, 0.1ml each, were mixed with 0.1 ml of AE-labeled monoclonal anti-CKMB (007) consisting of 100 million RLU's in PBS/BSA. Anti-CKMM (13F10)-liposomes-PMP complex, prepared in section a (4) were then added in 0.5 ml PBS/BSA (50µg PMP) and the mixtures were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. The PMP's were then magnetically separated and washed with 1ml of PBS/BSA three times, using a magic separation rack (Ciba Corning Diagnostics Corp.). The liposome bridge was then dissolved by addition of 0.25ml of a 0.1% solution of Triton (Registered Trade Mark) X-100 in deionized water, followed by immediate placement of the test tubes in the magnetic separation rack. A 0.2 ml aliquot of the supernatant solution, containing the released labeled immune complex was immediately transferred to fresh test tubes. To these tubes, 0.5ml of PMP-immobilized anti-CKBB(CA8) containing 50µg PMP was immediately added and the tubes were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature in order to re-capture the immune complex. This PMP was magnetically separated and washed with lml of PBS+BSA, followed by chemiluminescence readout in the luminometer. In a control experiment the PMP's were read in the luminometer before the addition of Triton X-100. Typical calibration curves are shown below: Control assay (no release/recapture) Assay with release/recapture CKMB ng/ml RLU's CKMB mg/ml RLU'S 0 78626 0 958 0.45 117391 0.45 5721 4.50 258079 4.50 74069 45.00 1819078 45.00 721085 Thus the release of the immune complex using the liposomal bridge and a detergent, followed by recapturing the complex with a fresh solid phase led to reduction of background signal and increase in the signal/background ratio.

Claims: A method for increasing the sensitivity and accuracy of a binding assay conducted under sufficiently mild conditions characterised in that it comprises: (a) reacting the analyte with a labeled specific binder and with a specific binder, which has been reversibly attached directly or indirectly to a first solid phase via a heterologous immunochemical bridge or a lipophilic bridge to form a labeled specific binder-analyte-specific binder-optional component-first solid phase complex; (b) separating the labeled specific binder-analyte and, in some cases, the specific binder from the optional component-first solid phase, to form a separated complex; (c) reattaching the separated complex to a second optional component attached to a second solid phase via either an epitope on the analyte or an epitope on the specific binder; and (d) determining the amount of the analyte present by measurement of the amount of the labeled specific binder attached to the second solid phase; separation (b) being completed in 10 minutes or less. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the binding assay is an immunochemical assay, a lectin assay or a receptor assay. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the separation (b) is completed in 1 minute or less. A method as claimed in claim 1 for increasing the sensitivity and accuracy of an immunochemical assay characterised in that it comprises: (a) reacting the analyte with a labeled specific binder and with a specific binder which has been reversibly attached to a first solid phase via a heterologous bridge to form a labeled specific binder-analyte-specific binder-first solid phase complex; (b) separating the labeled specific binder-analyte-specific binder complex from the first solid phase; (c) reattaching the labeled specific binder-analyte-specific binder to a second specific binder which binds to the analyte or another component of the immune complex and which is attached to a second solid phase; and (d) determining the amount of the analyte present by measurement of the amount of the labeled specific binder attached to the second solid phase. A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein the reversible binding is achieved by the use of anti-dinitrophenyl attached to the first solid phase and mononitrophenyl is attached to the specific binder; the separation is achieved by the addition of dinitrophenyl-lysine; and the reattaching is achieved by attaching to the second solid phase an antibody to a material sufficiently similar to the analyte to form a second solid phase-antibody complex such that the analyte is suitably captured by the second solid phase-antibody complex. A method for increasing the sensitivity and accuracy of an immunochemical assay characterised in that it comprises: (a) reacting the analyte with a labeled specific binder and with a specific binder which has been attached to a first solid phase, to form a labeled specific binder-analyte-specific binder-first solid phase complex; (b) separating the labeled specific binder-analyte complex from the first solid phase by the use of an anti-idiotype specific binder, a partial analyte mimic, or a fragment derived from one of these; (c) reattaching the specific binder-analyte complex to a second specific binder, which binds to the analyte or another component of the immune complex and which is attached to a second solid phase; and (d) determining the amount of the analyte present by measurement of the amount of the labeled specific binder attached to the second solid phase. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the reversible binding is achieved by the use of an antibody to the analyte or to an analyte-like substance which is attached to the first solid phase; the separation is achieved by the addition of an excess of an anti-idiotypic antibody or fragment thereof; and the reattaching is achieved by attaching to the second solid phase an antibody to a material sufficiently similar to the analyte to form a second solid phase-antibody complex, such that the analyte is suitably captured by the second solid phase-antibody complex. A method as claimed in claim 1 for increasing the sensitivity and accuracy of an immunochemical assay characterised in that it comprises: (a) reacting the analyte with (i) a labeled specific binder and (ii) a specific binder which has been reversibly attached to a first solid phase by the use of a lipophilic material to form a labeled specific binder-analyte-lipophilic material-first solid phase complex; (b) separating the labeled specific binder-analyte-specific binder complex from the first solid phase; (c) reattaching the labeled specific binder-analyte-specific binder complex to a second specific binder, which binds to the analyte or another component of the immune complex and which is attached to a second solid phase; and (d) determining the amount of the analyte present by measurement of the amount of the labeled specific binder attached to the second solid phase. A method as claimed in claim 8 wherein the lipophilic material is a liposome, emulsion, hexagonal phase, micelle, bilayer, monolayer, or a combination of two or more thereof. A method as claimed in claim 8 or claim 9 wherein the reversible binding is achieved by the use of a liposome; the separation is achieved by the addition of a detergent; and the reattaching is achieved by attaching to the second solid phase an antibody to a material sufficiently similar to the analyte to form a second solid phase-antibody complex, such that the analyte is suitably captured by the second solid phase-antibody complex. A method as claimed in any of claims 1 to 10 wherein the labeled specific binder is reacted with the analyte during the same step or a different step than the analyte is reacted with the specific binder-first solid phase complex. A method as claimed in any of claims 1 to 11 wherein the separated complex is separated from the first solid phase during the same step or a different step than the separated complex is reattached to the second solid phase. A method as claimed in any of claims 1 to 12 wherein the label consists of a radioactive label, a chemiluminescent label or an enzyme-linked immunoassay label. A method as claimed in claim 13 wherein the label is an acridinium ester. A method as claimed in any of claims 1 to 14 wherein one or both of the solid phases consist(s) of paramagnetic particles.

Inventors: PIRAN URI, RIORDAN WILLIAM J, SILBERT-SHOSTEK DEBORAH R, PIRAN, URI, RIORDAN, WILLIAM J., SILBERT-SHOSTEK, DEBORAH R.
Applicants: CIBA CORNING DIAGNOSTICS CORP, CIBA CORNING DIAGNOSTICS CORP.
Application year: 1993
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: G01N33