Built-in self-test network

Abstract: Control of the self-testing of a plurality of elements (12 1 - 12 m ), each having a Built-In, Self-Test (BIST) capability, and arranged in one or more groups (14 1 - 14 n ), is carried out by a network (16) of one or more standard BIST resource interface controllers (SBRICs 18 1 - 18 n ). Each SBRIC in the network controls the self-testing of the elements in a separate one of the groups in sequence by broadcasting a test command to the elements in parallel which, in response, generate test signatures stored by the SBRIC. The SBRICs in the network are coupled in series in daisy chain fashion to enable the test signatures stored by the SBRICs to be concatenated for easy retrieval by shifting out the test signatures therefrom, using a technique such as boundary scan.

Description: This invention relates to networks for, and to methods for, controlling the self-testing of a plurality of circuit elements. Modern digital circuits now incorporate ever larger arrays of circuit elements (RAMs, ROMs CAMs, FIFOs and Random Logic blocks, for example) as designers strive to provide increased circuit functionality. The increasing density of modern digital circuits has greatly increased the difficulty of testing such circuits with conventional external testing machines designed for this purpose. Consequently, much effort has been devoted to designing individual circuit elements with an ability to test themselves, that is, provide the elements with a Built-in Self-Test (BIST) capability. Examples of circuit elements having BIST capability are found in U.S. Patent No. 4,872,168, issued on October 3, 1989, and U.S. Patent 5,091,908, issued on February 25, 1992, both assigned to AT&T Bell Laboratories, the present assignee. The presence of individual circuit elements having BIST capability within a Very Large Scale Integrated (VLSI) circuit has not, however, eliminated the difficulty of testing. The testing of a VLSI circuit incorporating a variety of BIST'd elements, that is, elements having BIST capability, requires that an interface be provided within the circuit to couple a control signal from a test controller to each BIST'd element to initiate self-testing. In addition, the interface also must serve to latch a test signature generated by each BIST'd element at the completion of testing to allow subsequent transfer of the signature to the test controller. One approach to providing such an interface for BIST'd RAM elements is described in the paper "ASIC Implementation of Boundary-Scan and BIST" by H. N. Scholz et al., published in the Proceedings of the 8th International Custom Microelectronics Conference (London, United Kingdom) 1989, pp. 43.1-43.9. In this paper, Scholz et al. describe a Built-In Self-Test (BIST) Resource Interface Controller (BRIC), typically a finite-state machine, for initiating self-testing of an individual BIST'd RAM in response to a start signal from a test controller. At the completion of testing, the RAM generates a test signature, indicative of the test result, which is stored (i.e., latched) in the BRIC. The disadvantage of this approach is that a separate BRIC is required for each BIST'd RAM. Thus, scheduling of self-testing of each BIST'd RAM by its corresponding BRIC, as well as collection of the test signature from the corresponding BRIC must be coordinated by a test controller. As a result, the test controller must possess a high degree of sophistication to carry out such tasks, thus increasing its complexity and cost. Thus, there is a need for a built-in self-test control network for scheduling the self-testing of a plurality of different types of BIST'd elements, and for latching the collective test signatures of the elements so as to reduce the complexity of the test controller. US-A-4498172 discloses a means for self-testing a system by employing a POLYDIV self-testing technique. The POLYDIV self-testing system collects quotients of a polynominal division process from individual functional networks. The quotients are then compressed in a central signature processor. This is done to produce an overall response signature. The overall response signature is then compared with an expected fault free signature to determine the pass fail status of the system. IEEE DESIGN & TEST OF COMPUTERS, vol. 7, no. 2, April 1990, LOS ALAMITOS, US pages 29-40 discloses the use of BIST in the Macrolan chip. The use of quasiexhaustive testing was found to be a powerful technique for testing small blocks of irregular logic. It allows the use of two or more LFSRs in parallel as patterned generators for a block of logic. A BIST test is done for each testable unit. This is done by generating patterns in the registers at the unit inputs compacting a signature in the registers at the unit outputs. The seed and control values are shifted into the registers. These are then put in the test mode for a number of clock cycles. The signature values are then shifted out of the scan pass. The BIST tests are done in parallel whether the test use different LFSRs or the same LFSRs in the same mode. This reduces the test time, the time to simulate signature generation and the LFSRs seeds and signatures shifted in and out of the diagnostic unit. PROCEEDINGS OF THE CUSTOM INTEGRATED CIRCUITS CONFERENCE, BOSTON, MAY 13-16, 1990 pages 2831-2834 discloses the use of a BIST technique that can be implemented on all types of modules in a circuit. A circuit is partitioned into structural modules and is identified. This allows for several modules to be tested in parallel, thereby increasing the speed and efficiency of the test. Several BIST techniques are disclosed. The techniques make use of macrocells available by the standard cell library generator, such as the register file, to automate BIST. According to one aspect of this invention there is provided a network as claimed in claim 1. According to another aspect of this invention there is provided a method as claimed in claim 5. According to a further aspect of this invention there is provided a method as claimed in claim 6. In an embodiment of the invention, a built-in self-test control network is provided for a digital circuit containing a large number of BIST'd elements. The control network includes a plurality of SBRICs serially coupled in a daisy chain. The first SBRIC in the chain serves to initiate self-testing of a first group or stage of BIST'd elements which are coupled to the SBRIC in parallel. Each successive SBRIC in the chain is responsive to a control signal generated by a previous SBRIC in the chain and serves to initiate self-testing of the BIST'd elements in the corresponding successive stage associated with that SBRIC so that the stages of elements are tested in sequence. Each SBRIC includes a least one test register for storing the collective test signature of the BIST'd elements in the associated stage associated with that SBRIC. By virtue of the SBRICs being serially coupled in a daisy chain, the test signature of each stage latched into a corresponding SBRIC is advantageously concatenated with the test signatures held by the other SBRICs. Thus, the resultant string of test signatures held by the chain of SBRICs can be advantageously shifted out using a technique such as boundary scan. Brief Description of the Drawing FIGURE 1 is a block schematic diagram of a portion of a digital circuit incorporating a built-in self-test network embodying the present invention; FIGURE 2 is a state diagram of a Standard, Built-in self-test Resource Interface Controller (SBRIC) comprising part of the network of FIG. 1; and FIGURE 3 is a block schematic diagram of the SBRIC of FIG. 2. Detailed Description FIGURE 1 is a block schematic diagram of a digital circuit 10 comprised of a plurality of individual circuit elements 12 1 ,12 2 ,12 3 ...12 m where m is an integer ≥ two. The elements 12 1 - 12 m are arranged in groups or stages 14 1 ,14 2 ,14 3 ... 14 n of two or more elements each where n is an integer ≤ m. Each of the elements 12 1 - 12 m takes the form of a digital logic element, such as, for example, a RAM, ROM, CAM, FIFO or Random Logic Element, which has a built-in, self-test capability. In other words, each of the elements 12 1 - 12 m is BIST'd. The number and type of elements 12 1 - 12 m present in the circuit 10 is dependent on its function, and it should be understood that the circuit could include a larger or smaller number of elements, arranged the same or differently from those shown in FIG. 1. Additionally, the circuit 10 may also include other types of elements (not shown) which are not BIST'd. Generally, self-testing of each of the BIST'd elements 12 1 - 12 m is carried out by applying a start BIST signal, hereinafter referred to as an SBIST signal, to each element. In response to the SBIST signal, each of the BIST'd elements 12 1 - 12 m executes a self-testing routine in accordance with its particular structure. The results of the self-testing undertaken by each of the elements 12 1 - 12 m are reflected in the status of a flag (not shown), referred to as a BIST flag, within each element. Typically, the BIST flag within each of the elements 12 1 - 12 m , which is usually one bit wide, is set to zero for a "pass" condition (i.e., a successful self-test) while the flag is set to a binary one for a "fail" condition (i.e, an unsuccessful test). The status of the BIST flag serves as a "test signature" for that element. Once the BIST flag is set, each element generates a BIST complete signal, hereinafter referred to as the BC signal, indicating that the element has completed its BIST routine. Even though the BIST'd elements 12 1 - 12 m appear to have each undergone successful self-testing, one or more elements may be defective because its BIST flag is stuck at a binary zero (i.e., the BIST flag erroneously indicates a successful test). To avoid a "false positive" test result, each of the elements 12 1 - 12 m is supplied with a BIST flag check signal, referred to as a BFC signal, at the completion of testing. The BFC signal serves to toggle the BIST flag within each element. If the BIST flag toggles (i.e., changes state) in response to the BFC signal, then the test result, reflected by the state of the BIST flag within the element, is indeed accurate. Control of the BIST function of the BIST'd elements 12 1 - 12 m within the circuit 10 is accomplished by a BIST control network 16. The network 16 is comprised of at least one, and preferably, a plurality of, Standard BIST Resource Interface Controllers (SBRICs) 18 1 ,18 2 ,18 3 ...18 n , each SBRIC controlling the BIST'd elements in a corresponding one of the stages 14 1 - 14 n , respectively. As will be discussed in greater detail below with respect to FIGS. 2 and 3, each of the SBRICs 18 1 - 18 n typically comprises a five-state, finite-state machine which initiates testing of those of the elements 18 1 - 18 n in a corresponding stage by broadcasting an SBIST signal to the elements in that stage. Further, at the completion of testing, each of the SBRICs 18 1 - 18 n broadcasts a BFC signal to the elements in its corresponding stage to toggle the BIST flag in each element to check if the flag is stuck at a zero. Each of the SBRICs 18 1 - 18 n , in addition to supplying both the SBIST and BFC signals, also serves to store the test signature of the elements in its corresponding stage. The test signature is stored in each SBRIC within a User Data Test Register (UTDR) 20, which, as will be described, typically takes the form of one or more flip-flops. The UTDR 20 in each of the SBRICs 18 1 - 18 n is serially coupled with those of the other SBRICs in the network 16. In this way, the test signatures held by the SBRICs 18 1 - 18 n are concatenated and may be shifted out from the network 16 by a technique such as boundary scan. For example, in the network 16, the SBRICs 18 1 - 18 n are coupled so that the UTDR 20 of the first SBRIC 18 1 has its input coupled to a Test Data Output (TDO) of a boundary scan test controller 21 and the last SBRIC 18 n has the output of its UTDR coupled to a Test Data Input (TDI) of the controller. In this way, the concatenated test signature held by the SBRICs 18 1 - 18 n can be shifted out to the boundary scan test controller by shifting a string of kn bits through the network 16 of SBRICs, where k ≥ 1 and corresponds to the number of flip-flops per SBRIC (not shown). As described earlier, each of the SBRICs 18 1 - 18 n , as generically represented by the SBRIC 18 i where i= 1,2,3... n , comprises a five-state, finite-state machine, the state diagram of which is shown on FIG. 2. As depicted in FIG. 2, the five states of the SBRIC 18 i comprise an IDLE state 22, a BIST execution state 24, a FAIL state 26, a WAIT state 28, and a PASS state 30. At the outset of operation, the SBRIC 18 i enters the IDLE state 22 of FIG. 2 during which time the SBRIC is dormant. The SBRIC 18 i remains in the IDLE state 22 for as long as either of two signals, Run BIST, hereinafter referred to as RB, and SBRIC 18 i -1 complete, hereinafter referred to as SBC i -1 , is at a binary zero value. The signal RB is generated by the test controller 21 of FIG. 1 and is broadcast to the SBRIC 18 i . By raising the logic state of the signal RB from a binary zero to a binary one, the test controller 21 signals the SBRIC 18 i to initiate self-testing of the elements 12 1 - 12 m in its corresponding stage 14 i . As will become better understood by FIG. 3, the signal SBC i -1 , which is generated by the SBRIC 18 i -1 , changes to a binary one level at the completion of built-in self-testing of the elements in the stage 14 i -1 . By the same token, the SBRIC 18 i will generate a binary one level signal SBC i when it has completed built-in self-testing of the elements in its corresponding stage 14 i . In this way, each succeeding one of the SBRICs 18 1 - 18 n in the network 16 of FIG. 1 is actuated in sequence by the previous SBRIC to initiate self-testing of its corresponding stage so that the elements in the stages 14 1 - 14 n are self-tested in sequence. When both the RB and SBC i -1 signals reach a binary one level, then the SBRIC 18 i enters the BIST execution state 24 and generates a binary one level SBIST signal which is broadcast to those of the elements 12 1 - 12 m within the stage 14 i . Normally, the SBRIC 18 i remains in the BIST execution state 24 until such time as the elements within the stage 14 i have each generated a binary one level BC signal to indicate that the element has completed self-testing. However, should any of the elements in the stage 14 i generate a binary one level BF' signal (i.e., a signal obtained by logically OR'ing the individual BF signals) during the time the SBRIC is in the BIST execution state 24, then the Fail state 26 is entered. There is an important reason for entering the Fail state 26 immediately upon receipt of a binary one level BF signal from any element in the stage 14 i , rather than waiting until the completion of testing of all of the elements in the stage. In practice, the elements 12 1 - 12 m are clocked at a much higher frequency than the SBRICs 18 1 - 18 m . Thus, an element within the stage 14 i may complete its BIST routine, then generate a binary one level BF to indicate a fault, and thereafter reset its BIST flag so as to now generate a binary zero BF signal, all well before the SBRIC 18 i has been notified that the other elements in the stage have each completed their self-testing routines. Were the SBRIC 18 i to read the BIST flag of the element 12 j after it had been reset, the state of the BIST flag would reflect a pass condition when, in fact, the element had actually failed. The SBRIC 18 i enters the Wait state 28 from the BIST execution state 24 when each of the BC signals from the elements in the stage 14 i is at a binary one level and each BF signal is at a binary zero level (i.e., BF' = 0). During the Wait state 28, the SBRIC 18 i generates a binary one level BFC signal to toggle the BIST flag elements within the corresponding stage 14 i to check for a stuck-at-zero condition. While in the Wait state 28, the SBRIC 18 i also generates a binary one level SBC i signal to notify the next successive SBRIC 18 i +1 in the network 16 of FIG. 1 to initiate self-testing of the elements in its corresponding stage 14 i +1 . The SBRIC 18 i remains in its Wait state 28 for so long as the RB signal supplied by the test controller 21 of FIG. 1 remains at a binary one level. In other words, once the SBRIC 18 i has initiated built-in self-testing of the elements in its corresponding stage 14 i and has actuated the next SBRIC 18 i +1 in the network 16, the SBRIC 18 i waits for the RB signal to become a binary zero, which occurs once all of the SBRICs have been sequenced. The SBRIC 18 i leaves the Wait state 28 and either enters the Fail state 26, as mentioned earlier, or the Pass state 30, depending on the status of each of the BF signals from the elements in the stage 14 i . If the RB signal is zero and one or more of the BF signals is at a binary zero level, that is, BF' = 0 (indicating a stuck-at-zero condition of one or more of the elements in the stage), then the Fail state 26 is entered. Conversely, if the RB signal is a binary zero, but all of the BF signals from the elements in the stage 14 i are a binary one (indicating a successful test and BIST flag check), then the Pass state 30 is entered. Once the SBRIC 18 i enters either the Fail state 26 or the Pass state 30, the SBRIC remains in that state until a reset signal (from the test controller 21 of FIG. 1) is asserted, or until the contents of the UTDR 20 are scanned out, and the values corresponding to the Idle state 22 are scanned in. Thereafter, the SBRIC 18 i returns to the Idle state 22. The Idle state 22 is also entered from the BIST execution state 24 when RB goes to zero. Further, the Idle state 22 is entered from any other state when a logic one-level RESET signal is applied. Referring now to FIG. 3, there is shown a block schematic diagram of the SBRIC 18 i (the SBRICs being identically configured to each other). The SBRIC 18 i comprises three separate flip-flops 32, 34 and 36, respectively, which collectively comprise UTDR 20 of FIG. 1. Each of the flip-flops 32, 34, and 36 has its input supplied with output of a separate one of a set of multiplexers 38,40 and 42, respectively, each multiplexer being controlled by a signal SHIFTN generated by the test controller 21 of FIG. 1. The first input of the multiplexer 38 is supplied with a test signal from the TDO test controller 21 of FIG. 1 while the first input of each of the multiplexers 40 and 42 is supplied with the output signal of a separate one of the flip-flops 32 and 34, respectively. The output signal of the flip-flop 36 is coupled to the TDI of the test controller 21. The flip-flops 32, 34, and 36 each generate a separate one of a set of output signals S0, S1 and S2, respectively, referred as state signals, which are supplied to a combinational logic block 44. The logic block 44 is also supplied with the RB signal from the test controller 21 of FIG. 1 and the signal SBC i- 1 from the SBRIC 18 i -1 (not shown). Additionally, the logic block 44 is supplied with the output of an OR gate 46 and the output of each of a pair of AND gates 48 and 50. The OR and AND gates 46 and 48 serve to logically OR and AND the BF and BC signals, respectively, generated by the elements (not shown) in the corresponding stage 14 i (not shown) controlled by the SBRIC 18 i . The AND gate 50 serves to logically AND all the BF signals to determine whether all the BIST flags change state during the BIST flag check. For ease of reference the output signals of the OR gate 46 and the AND gates 48 and 50 are designated by the terms BF', BC' and BF", respectively. The combinational logic block 44 is typically comprised of a network of individual gates (not shown) which is supplied at its inputs with the signals S0, S1, S2, RB, SBC i -1 and the output signals of the gates 46,48 and 50. In response to the signals at its inputs, the combinational logic block 44 generates the signals SBIST and BFC. Also, the block generates a set of signals NS0, NS1, and NS2 which are each supplied to the second input of a corresponding one of the multiplexers 32,34 and 36. During self-testing, the SHFTN signal is held at a binary zero so that the multiplexers 32, 34 and 36 pass a separate one of the signals NS0, NS1 and NS2 to a respective one of the flip-flops 32, 34 and 36, respectively. To better understand the relationship between the input signals supplied to the combinational logic block 44, and the output signals generated thereby, reference should be had to Table I below which contains two separate sets of entries divided by a vertical double line. Current State RB SBC i -1 BF' BC' BF'' Next State SBIST BFC SBC i Idle 22(1) 0 X X X X Idle 22 0 0 0 Idle 22(2) X 0 X X X Idle 22 0 0 0 Idle 22(3) 1 1 X X X BIST Ex. 24 0 0 0 BIST Ex. 24(1) 0 X X X X Idle 22 0 0 0 BIST Ex. 24(2) 1 X X 0 X BIST Ex. 24 1 0 0 BIST Ex. 24(3) 1 X 0 1 X Wait 28 1 0 0 BIST Ex. 24(4) 1 X 1 X X Fail 26(1) 1 0 0 Wait 28(1) 1 X X X X Wait 28 1 1 1 Wait 28(2) 0 X X X 0 Fail 26(2) 1 1 1 Wait 28(3) 0 X X X 1 Pass 30 1 1 1 Fail 26(1) X X X X X Fail 26(4) 1 1 1 Pass 30(1) X X X X X Pass 30 1 1 1 The left-hand set of entries in Table I indicates the relationship between each of the five presently active states of the SBRIC 18 i (Idle, BIST execution, Wait, Fail and Pass) and the status of each of the input signals RB, SBC i- 1 , BF', BC' and BF" to the logic block 44 during each state. For each current state of the SBRIC 18 i , represented by an entry in the left-hand side of Table I, there is a corresponding entry in the right-hand side of the table. Each entry in the right-hand side of the table represents the next state of the SBRIC that immediately follows the current state (the left-hand entry), and the state of the output signals, BIST, BFC and SBC i for that next state. As an example, at the outset of self-testing, the RB signal from the test controller is a binary zero, so that the SBRIC 18 i is in the Idle state 22 (1), as indicated by the first entry in the left-hand part of Table I. The status of the SBC i -1 signal, and the signals BF', BC' and BF", from the OR gate 46 and the AND gates 48 and 50, respectively, are not of concern and therefore are depicted in the left-hand portion of Table I as don't-care (x) values. From the Idle state 22 (1), the next state of the SBRIC 18 i immediately following it is the Idle state 22 (1), at which time, the signals SBIST, BFC and SBC i produced by the combinational logic block 44 are each a binary zero. This state of affairs is consistent with that described in FIG. 2 since the SBRIC 18 i remains in the Idle state (22) for as long as either of the RB and SBC i -1 signals is a binary. Now consider when the SBRIC 18 i is currently in the BIST execution state 24 (4) while the input signals RB and BF' are each a binary one and the BC, SBC i and BF" signals are at don't-care values. From the BIST execution state 24 (4), the next state entered by the SBRIC 18 i is the Fail state 26 (1) at which time the SBIST signal is at a binary one, while BFC and SBC i signals are each maintained at a binary zero. This state of affairs is consistent with that depicted in FIG. 2 since the presence of a binary one level BF' signal indicates a failure in the testing of one or more of the elements in the stage 14 i . At the completion of self-testing (i.e., while the SBRIC 18 i of FIG. 3 remains in the Idle state 22 of FIG. 2), the SHFTN signal changes to a binary one level. Once the SHFTN signal changes states, a stream of bits supplied at the TDI of the SBRIC 18 i from the test controller 21 of FIG. 1 can be shifted through the flip-flops 32, 34, and 36 of FIG. 3 to shift out the composite test signature of the elements in the stage 14 i which is held by these flip-flops. When the RESET signal is asserted (RESET=1), the SBRIC 18 i will be forced to enter the IDLE state 22 unconditionally, The foregoing describes a network 16, comprised of one or more standard BIST resource interface controllers 18 1 - 18 n for controlling the self-testing of a plurality of BIST'd elements 12 1 - 12 m . It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of the invention. Various modifications and changes may be made thereto by those skilled in the art which will embody the invention and fall within the scope thereof. For example, each SBRIC 18 i in the illustrated embodiment has been configured to store a single composite test signature obtained by logically OR'ing the test signatures of the individual elements in the corresponding stage 14 i . Rather than store a composite test signature, each SBRIC 18 i could easily be modified to store a multi-bit test signature, with each bit representing the individual test signature of a separate element in the stage.

Claims: A network for controlling the self-testing of a plurality of circuit elements such as ROMs, RAMs, FIFOs, CAMs and/or random logic elements, each having Build-In, Self-Test (BIST) capability, wherein at least one Standard BIST Resource Controller (SBRIC) (18 1 ) is coupled to a plurality of the circuit elements (12 1 -2 m ) having BIST capability for generating a test command which is broadcast to the circuit elements in parallel to cause each circuit element to initiate self-testing thereof and to cause the element to generate a test signature, each SBRIC being for storing the collective test signatures generated by the circuit elements following self-testing, said network being CHARACTERIZED BY: a plurality of SBRICs (18 2 -18 n ) serially coupled in a daisy chain, each SBRIC being responsive to each preceding SBRIC in the chain for initiating self-testing of a group of the circuit elements so that the groups of circuit elements are self-tested in sequence. A network according to claim 1 wherein each SBRIC comprises: a finite-state machine for broadcasting a test command to each of the circuit elements, which are coupled to the SBRIC, to initiate self-testing of said circuit elements and for storing a composite test signature indicative of the test signatures generated by the elements; and logic gate means coupled to each of said circuit elements for logically combining the individual test signatures of the circuit elements to yield a composite signature supplied to the finite-state machine for storage. A network according to claim 1 wherein each SBRIC comprises: a finite-state machine responsive to a sequencing signal from a preceding SBRIC in the chain of SBRICs for (a) broadcasting a test command to each of the circuit elements coupled to the SBRIC to initiate self-testing thereof, (b) storing a composite test signature indicative of the test signatures of the circuit elements, and (c) generating a sequencing signal to render a successive SBRIC in the chain operative to initiate self-testing of its corresponding elements; and logic gate means (46,48,50) coupled to said circuit elements for logically combining the individual test signatures of the circuit elements to yield a composite signature supplied to the finite-state machine for storage. A network according to claim 2 wherein the finite-state machine comprises: first, second and third flip-flops (32,34,36) coupled in daisy chain fashion such that the first and second flip-flops each have their output coupled to the input of a separate one of the second and third flip-flops, respectively, each of the first, second and third flip-flops being for generating separate first, second and third state signals, respectively, in accordance with the signal at the input of each flip- flop; and a logic block (44) responsive to the first, second and third state signals from the first, second and third flip-flops, respectively, and responsive to a sequence signal generated by a preceding SBRIC in a chain of SBRICs for generating the test command signal supplied to an associated group of circuit elements, and in response to a composite test signature from said circuit elements, said logic block being for generating a sequence signal supplied to a successive SBRIC in the chain of SBRICs, and generating separate first, second and third next-state signals supplied to the input of a separate one of the first, second and third flip-flops, respectively. A method for controlling self-testing of a plurality of circuit elements (12 1 -12 m ), such as ROMs, RAMs, FIFOs, CAMs and/or random logic elements, each having built-in self-testing capability, comprising broadcasting a test command to each of the circuit elements (12 1 -12 m ) in parallel to initiate self-testing thereof so that each circuit element generates a test signature; and storing the test signatures of the elements following the self-testing thereof, and CHARACTERIZED BY logically combining the test signatures of the circuit elements to yield a single composite test signature. A method for controlling self-testing of a plurality of groups (14 1 -14 n ) of circuit elements (12 1 -12 m ), such as ROMs, RAMs, FIFOs, CAMs and/or random logic elements, each having built-in self-testing capability, CHARACTERIZED BY the steps of: broadcasting a test command to each group of circuit elements in sequence to initiate self-testing thereof so that the circuit elements in the group generate a test signature; storing the test signatures of the circuit elements following testing in a separate one of a chain of serially connected test registers associated with the elements; and generating a sequencing signal to initiate self-testing of a successive group of circuit elements following receipt of the group of elements just tested. A method according to claim 6 wherein the test signatures are read from the chain of test registers by shifting a stream of bits therethrough. A method according to claim 6 wherein the test signatures generated by each group of circuit elements are logically combined to yield a composite test signature for storage in the test register.

Inventors: YAU CHI WANG, ZORIAN YERVANT, YAU, CHI WANG, ZORIAN, YERVANT
Applicants: AT & T CORP, AT&T CORP.
Application year: 1993
Main classification: G01R31
IPC codes: G01R31, H01L21