PATHOGEN-TARGETED BIOCATALYST

Abstract: This invention pertains to biocatalysts that are specifically targeted to bind pathogens, such as viruses, and to degrade components of pathogens in order to abrogate their pathogenicity, and to methods of preventing or treating infection by pathogenic organisms. The biocatalysts comprise a binding agent which specifically binds a surface component of a pathogen, for instance the gp120 viral coat protein of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus, and a catalytic moiety which degrades a component of the pathogen so that its pathogenicity is abrogated. The binding agent and the catalytic moiety are linked by chemical linkers or genetic engineering techniques.

Description: PATHOGEN-TARGETED BIOCATALYSTS Background of the Invention Pathogenic organisms, including viruses, may be divided into different classes on the basis of their fate after being phagocytized. For instance, organisms that are promptly destroyed when phagocytized (i.e., S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes) behave as extracellular parasites, damaging tissues only so long as they remain outside phagocytic cells. Pathogens that function as extracellular parasites owe their virulence to antiphagocytic surface components. Most pathogenic bacteria for example, maintain capsules comprising high-molecular-weight polysaccharides. The relation between capsules, phagocytosis and virulence is clearly exemplified by S. pneumoniae. A fully encapsulated S (smooth) strain is found to resist phagocytosis (in the absence of antibodies) and is highly virulent for mice, whereas its nonencapsulated R (rough) mutant is readily phagocytized and is essentially avirulent. However, enzymatic removal of the capsular polysaccharide, or combination with antibody, renders the S organisms both nonpathogenic and susceptible to phagocytosis. In contrast to extracellular parasites, there are two classes of intracellular parasites, both of which can multiply within phagocytic cells. One class of these intracellular pathogens comprise the obligate intracellular parasites (i.e., rickettsiae, chlamydiae) . For these organisms, which include viruses, subtle differences in the cell surface receptors essential for their uptake may be important in resistance. Many pathogens, whether intracellular or extracellular, are organotropic. That is, they are highly selective in regard to the tissue or cell-type that they infect or invade. One determinant of tissue tropism is the presence of surface macromolecules on the pathogen that promote adherence to specific receptors on one host cell-type but not on others. For instance, the role of specific bacterial adherence is now increasingly recognized in the selective colonization of host tissue or cell-types. For many obligate intracellular parasites, the molecules responsible for organotropic adherence are also crucial to the internalization of the pathogen. Blocking this cell-specific interaction aids in the destruction of pathogenicity. For instance, antibodies to pathogen surface constituents promote immunity not only by opsonization but also by covering antigens involved in adherence. Moreover, in body secretions, secreted glycoproteins closely related to cell surface components may play a role in host defense by competing with fixed receptors and thus preventing adsorption of adherent pathogens. Viruses, which are noncellular in nature, are vastly less complex than prokaryotic or eukaryotic cellular systems. Although as a group they are extremely heterogeneous, all viruses share certain basic properties. All viruses are obligate intracellular parasites; i.e., they cannot reproduce unless present within some host cell. Outside of the host cell, the virus exists as a particle, or virion, in which its genetic material is enclosed within a capsid shell comprising protein subunits, and in some instances, a membranous envelope as well. Viruses have been demonstrated to exhibit cell-specific tropism in that a given virus will infect only certain cell-types. The host cell range of the virus is determined by the specificity of attachment to the cells, which depends on properties of both the virion's capsid and specific receptors on the cell surface. The influenza viruses, for example, have as part of their capsid structure the hemagglutinin protein which facilitates the binding of the virus to receptors present on host cells. These limitations disappear when transfection occurs, i.e., when infection is carried out by the naked viral nucleic acid, whose entry does not depend on virus-specific receptors. CD4, a surface glycoprotein found p imarily on a subset of T lymphocytes, is a receptor .or both the class II major histocompatability complex (MHC) antigens and the human immunodefiency viruses (HIV) . The tropism of the HIV virus for CD4+ cells is governed through the direct binding and high affinity interactions between virion-associated gρl20 protein and CD4 (McDougal et al. (1986) Science 231:382 and Lasky et al. (1987) Cell 50:975) . In addition, cells expressing the envelope protein fuse with CD4-bearing cells in culture (Lipson et al. (1986) Nature 323:725 and Sodroski et al. (1986) Nature 322:470) . resulting in the formation of multinucleate syncytia. The most amino-terminal immunoglobulin-like domain of CD4 is sufficient to bind gpl20, although the second domain has also been shown to contribute to binding (Traunecker et al. (1988) Nature 331:8 ; Berger et al. (1988) PNAS 85.:2357; Richardson et al. (1988) PNAS :6102 and Clayton et al. (1988) Nature 335:363) . Additionally, studies of carbohydrate- mediated interactions of the envelope glycoprotein, gpl20, have presented evidence that binding to cell surfaces may also involve the carbohydrate moieties of gpl20 (Larkin et al., 1989 AIDS 3:793). Antiviral therapies directed towards abrogating proliferation of the HIV virus have been directed to specifically inhibiting interactions between CD4 and gρl20. Strategies have included antibodies directed against various epitopes on gpl20, facilitated for instance by immunization with immunogenic peptides resembling portions of gpl20 or administration of anti-gpl20 monoclonal antibodies. Both native and recombinant gpl20 elicit antibodies that are capable of neutralizing HIV in cell culture (Robey et al. (1986) PNAS :9709; Laskey et al. (1986) Science 233:209 and Putney et al. (1986) Science 234:1392) . These antibodies however are generally neutralizing only to the variant from which the immunizing gpl20 was derived. Studies in humans and mice have revealed a small region of gpl20, termed the V3 loop or principal neutralizing determinant, comprising about 35 residues between two invariant, disulfide-crosslinked cysteines (Cys-303 to Cys-338: HIV-1 nomenclature of Takahashi et al. (1992) Science 255:333), that evokes the major neutralizing antibodies to the virus (Palker et al. (1988) PNAS 15:1932; Rusche et al. (1988) PNAS 15_:3198 and Goudsmit et al. (1988) PNAS 85:4478) . While this same region is one of the most variable in sequence among different clonal isolates (Takahashi et al. (1992) Science 255:333), analysis of the amino acid sequences of this domain revealed conservation to better than 80-percent of the amino acids in 9 out of 14 positions in the central portion of the V3 loop. suggesting that there are constraints on the V3 loop variability (LaRosa et al. (1990) Science 249:932) . These results suggest that HIV vaccine immunogens chosen because of their similarity to the consensus V3 loop sequence and structure are likely to induce antibodies that neutralize a majority of HIV isolates. Soluble forms of CD4 have been shown to be capable of inhibiting the interaction between HIV gpl20 and CD4+ cells, presumably by binding and masking gpl20 on the surface of the virus or infected cell (Traunecker et al. (1989) Nature 339:68; Fisher et al. (1988) Nature 33_1:76; Chao et al. (1989) JBC 264:5812 and Capon et al. (1989) Nature 337:525) . Compounds such as Dextran sulphate and aurintricarboxylic acid, which act to bind CD4 and thereby inhibit gpl20 binding, have been explored for use as HIV prophylaxis (Schols et al. (1989) PNAS 11:3322 and Lederman et al. (1989) J. Immunol. 143:1149) . Recently, N-carboxmethoxy- carbonyl-prolyl-phenylalanyl benzyl esters have been shown to irreversibly denature gpl20 in such a manner as to abrogate binding to CD4 and inhibit HIV-1 infection (Finberg et al. (1990) Science 249:287) . The use of toxins targeted to HIV infected cells has also been explored. For instance, the gpl20-binding domain of CD4 has been linked to the Pseudomonas exotoxin A molecule such that cells expressing the HIV gpl20 molecule are selectively destroyed (Chaudhary et al. (1988) Nature 335:369) . Immunotoxins comprising human monoclonal antibodies specific for epitopes of the envelope proteins of HIV, gρl20 or gp41, conjugated to toxins such as ricin A chain or diptheria toxin, have been employed to specifically kill HIV infected cells (Till et al. (1989) PNAS 16:1987) . Alternatively, pokeweed mitogen, targeted to CD4+ cells has been shown to efficiently block HIV protein synthesis and also strongly inhibit HIV production in activated CD4+ T cells from infected patients (Zarling et al. (1990) Nature 347:92) . It has recently been reported that located close to the crown of the V3-type specific neutralization loop of the HIV-1 virus, are several potential sites that are susceptible to proteolytic cleavage by enzymes of trypsin-like or chymotrypsin-like specificity, or by aspartic proteases. (See for example, Clements et al., 1991, AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 7:3; Hattori et al., 1989, FEBS Letters 248:48; Kioto et al., 1989, INT Immunol. 1:613; Stephens et al., 1990, Nature 343:219. , incorporated by reference herein.) Summary of the Invention This invention pertains to biocatalysts that are specifically targeted to bind pathogens and to degrade components of pathogens in order to abrogate their pathogenicity, and to methods of preventing or treating infection by pathogenic organisms. The biocatalysts comprise a binding agent which specifically binds a surface component of a pathogen and a catalytic moiety which degrades a component of the pathogen so that its pathogenicity is abrogated. The binding agent and the catalytic moiety are linked by chemical or genetic engineering techniques. The binding agent is typically an antibody, a receptor or an analogue of either of these which is specific for the targeted surface component. Alternatively, the binding agent can be a polyanionic or polycationic molecule able to bind by ionic interactions to a charged determinant on a surface component of the pathogen. The catalytic moiety is an enzyme or catalytic antibody which degrades or substantially alters a component of the pathogen sufficiently to abrogate pathogenicity. Examples of enzymes include proteases, glycosidases, lipases and other hydrolases. The component of the pathogen targeted for degradation by the catalytic moiety can be the same or different from the component targeted for binding by the binding agent. For bacterium, the targeted component can be a capsular constituent. For a virus, the surface component can be an envelope protein or glycoprotein, preferably one which interacts with the cellular receptor for the virus and is involved in the mechanism of infection. An example is the gpl20 envelope glycoprotein of HIV-1. To target this component, the binding agent can be an antibody specific for gpl20, or a portion of the CD4 receptor able to bind gpl20. The biocatalyst of this invention can be used to prevent or treat infection by pathogenic organisms. The biocatalyst is administered to the host organism in a physiologically acceptable vehicle in amounts sufficient to abrogate pathogenicity. Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 shows the double stranded nucleic acid sequence for a CD4 gene fragment. Figure 2 shows 5' and 3' amplimers for PCR amplifying a catalytic domain fragment of tPA. Figure 3 shows various plasmids used to create a CD4/tPA fusion protein. Figure 4A and 4B show the nucleic acid sequence of a CD4/tPA fusion gene and the corresponding amino acid sequence. Figure 5 shows 5* and 3' amplimers for PCR amplifying a catalytic domain containing fragment of thrombin. Figures 6A and 6B show the nucleic acid sequence of a CD4/Thrombin fusion gene and the corresponding amino acid sequence. Detailed Description of the Invention Surface components of pathogens can play a major role in the survival of the pathogen, and therefor in its pathogenecity to a host. For instance, a given surface component can be crucial to the interaction of the pathogen with a host cell or tissue and is thus a critical component of the tissue-tropism of the pathogen. For intracellular pathogens, the surface component may be required for entry into the cell, while in the case of extracellular pathogens, particular surface components may be vital to the evasion of phagocytosis. Other surface components, such as the proteins, lipids and polysaccharides making up cellular walls, nutrient receptors including endocytic and pinocytic components, and chemotaxic receptors, can also be critical to the survival of the pathogen. The present invention provides a biocatalyst, directed against a surface component of a pathogen necessary for pathogenicity, such that action upon this component by the catalytic moiety destroys the functional integrity of this molecule and thereby disrupts pathogenicity. A distinct advantage of the biocatalyst of the present invention comes from the catalytic nature of the molecule's action on a pathogen. As stated above, interaction between surface components of pathogens and host cells have been implicated in pathogenicity. Disruption of these interactions has generally been accomplished by way of molecules which bind and mask essential determinants of at least one of the involved surface components. The typical masking molecule, such as a soluble receptor, requires a large number of molecules in circulation in order to effectively neutralize the pathogen, as the masking molecule acts stoichiometrically rather than catalytically. The pathogen-targeted biocatalysts of this invention direct a catalytic moiety to a surface component of the pathogen. The surface component is degraded and normal pathogen/cellular interactions are disrupted, thereby abrogating pathogenicity. The effectiveness of the biocatalyst is enhanced by the fact that the molecule, upon degradation of the surface component, is not "consumed" by the reaction. Most current regimens of therapy directed to disrupting pathogenicity by affecting the function of a surface component of a pathogen, act by masking the bound component. I. The Biocatalyst The pathogen-targeted biocatalysts of this invention comprise a binding agent that specifically recognizes and binds a surface component of the pathogen, and a catalytic moiety which degrades the surface component -or some other component located proximal thereto- such that the functional integrity of the surface component is destroyed and pathogenicity is disrupted. For instance, interactions between surface components of the pathogen and host cell can be disrupted, thereby abrogating pathogenicity. A. The Binding Agent The binding agent, which directs the molecule to the surface component of the pathogen, is preferably specific for determinants of the pathogen, with substantially less binding affinity for host components. The association constant of the binding agent can be selected or tailored to provide sufficient selectivity, but low enough that the biocatalyst is "turned over" at an acceptable rate. The binding agent can comprise an antibody or binding fragment thereof, including but not limited to: individual chain antibodies of either heavy or light chain origin; the variable region or a portion thereof from a light (Vj.) or heavy chain (VJJ) or a fragment containing both; an F(ab), F(ab)2, F v , sF v (single chain antibody) or substantially similar antibody • fragments; a heavy/light chain (HL) pair. In addition, the antibody or binding fragment can be a chimeric antibody, wherein one part of the molecule is of human origin and the rest originates from a different species. For instance, the variable regions of a murine monoclonal antibody directed against the surface component of a pathogen can be engineered into both human heavy and light chains. More preferable is the engineering of the mouse complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) or hypervariable regions into the the variable regions of human heavy and light chains. The advantage to a chimeric antibody of this nature is in reduced immunogenicity due to a reduced set of non-self antigens. Methods for constructing antibodies of this type are described in Reichmann et al. (1988) Nature 332:323: Verhoeyen et al. (1988) Science 329:1534: Sun et al. (1987) PNAS 8_4:214; and Jones et al. (1986) Nature 321:522. and incorporated by reference herein. The binding agent can also be a receptor or a portion of a receptor sufficient to specifically bind the surface component of the pathogen. The receptor can be a single peptide chain or multiple peptide chains held together by endogenous disulfide bonds or exogenous chemical linkages. The receptor can be cleaved from the surface of a cell and purified. Alternatively, the sequence can be cloned and expressed in an exogenous system for purification. In some instances, it will be appropriate to use molecules that exploit ionic interactions with determinants of the surface component that have a localized charge. Polyanionic or polycatonic binding agents such as oligonucleotides, heparin, lentinan and similar polysaccharide chains, polyamino peptides such as poly-aspartate, poly-glutamate, poly-lysine and poly-arginine, or other binding agents which maintain a number of either negative or positive charges over their structure at physiological pH's, can be used to specifically bind the protein component. Likewise, binding agents which exploit hydrophobic interactions can be utilized to target the biocatalyst. B. Catalytic Moiety The catalytic moiety of the pathogen-targeted biocatalyst can be a protease, a glycosidase, a lipase, or other hydrolases, or other enzymatic activity, including isomerases, transferases (including kinases), lyases and oxidoreductases, capable of degrading a surface component of the pathogen. In order to destroy pathogenicity, the degradation can, in the case of obligate intracellular parasites, destroy the ability of the pathogen to bind surface components of the host cell, or alternatively. destroy some other surface component essential for the survival of the parasite. For extracellular parasites, degradation can facilitate phagocytosis or disrupt some other component essential for survival. Examples of proteases, or catalytically active fragments thereof, that can be utilized to this end include serine proteases, cysteine proteases, aspartate or acid proteases, metalloproteases or any other protease capable of cleaving the amide backbone of the surface component in order to destroy the binding determinant necessary for productive interaction with a host cell or tissue or in the evasion of phagocytosis. Glycosidases, defined here as glycolytic enzymes which can alter the carbohydrate structure of the surface component of the pathogen, are useful in instances such as when carbohydrate-mediated interaction of the surface component of the pathogen with host cells is important to pathogenicity. Lysozyme is an example of a hydrolytic enzyme directed to polysaccharides, and has been demonstrated to be bacteriolytic due to the enzyme's ability to hydrolyze glycosidic linkages in the bacterial cell wall. Likewise, lipases can be employed to alter the membrane structure of the pathogen in order to abrogate binding, facilitate phagocytosis, or disrupt viability of the pathogen. Naturally occurring enzymes can be purified, or when possible, recombinant enzymes can be expressed and purified. In the instance of recombinant proteins, it can be useful to add mutations which will facilitate easy purification or direct the derivatization with chemical linking groups. For example, the addition of a free sulfhydryl group by way of site-directed mutagenesis, such as the introduction of a cysteine, can allow purification by mercury-derivatized columns to be carried out, as well as provide a reaction site for a chemical linking agent. The protein can be obtained whole, or as a fragment, so long as a suitable catalytic activity is associated with the purified protein. In some instances, the enzyme may be isolated as the pro-form, requiring further modification such as enzymatic cleavage to provide the active, mature form of the enzyme. Proteases that are useful as catalytic moieties in the present invention include: serine proteases such as chymotrypsin, trypsin, elastase, plasmin, tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), urokinase (UK), single-chain urokinase (scu-PA), thrombin, kallikrein, acrosin, cathepsin G, coagulation factors Vila, IXa and XIa; cysteine proteases such as cathepsin B, papain, ficin, chymopapain, clostripain and cathepsin L; and acid proteases such as the pepsins, chymosin and cathepsin D. Many purified serine proteases are commercially available, including: leukocyte elastase from human leukocytes (Sigma Catalog No. E1508); pancreatic elastase from human sputum (Sigma Catalog No. E1633); plasmin from human plasma (Sigma Catalog No. P4895); single-chain t-PA from human melanoma cell cultures (Sigma Catalog No. T7776); recombinant two-chain t-PA (Sigma Catalog No. T4654); urokinase from human kidney cells (Sigma Catalog No. U5004); urokinase from human urine (Sigma Catalog No. U6876); Trypsin (Sigma Catalog No. T8003); and alpha-Chymotrypsin (Sigma Catalog No. C7762) . Other useful enzymes include: pancreatic lipase; lipoprotein lipases; monoglyceride lipase; sphingosyl-glucopyranoside; sphingomyelinase; phosphoinosisides; phospholipases; peptidases such as carboxypeptidases, aminopeptidases and dipeptidases; glucosidases; glucanases; galactosidases; mannosidases; amylases and dextrinases. In addition, the catalytic moiety can be a catalytic antibody. Because antibodies can be generated that selectively bind almost any molecule of interest, this technology offers the potential to tailor-make highly selective catalysts. Methods for making catalytic antibodies are disclosed by Lerner et al. (1991) Science 252:659; Benkovic et al. (1990) Science 250:1135; Tramontano et al. (1986) Science 234:1566, all of which are incorporated by reference herein. Alternatively, tailoring of an antibody to create a catalytic antibody can be carried out by methods such as walk-through mutagenesis (see PCT application PCT/US91/02362, incorporated by reference herein) . II. Methods of Making the Biocatalysts The catalytic moiety can be linked to the binding agent in a number of ways including by chemical coupling means, or by genetic engineering. A. Chemical Coupling Agents There are a large number of chemical cross-linking agents that are known to those skilled in the art. For the present invention, the preferred cross-linking agents are heterobifunctional cross-linkers, which can be used to link proteins in a stepwise manner. Heterobifunctional cross-linkers provide the ability to design more specific coupling methods for conjugating proteins, thereby reducing the occurrences of unwanted side reactions such as homo-protein polymers. A wide variety of heterobifunctional cross-linkers are known in the art. These include: succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane- 1-carboxylate (SMCC), m-Maleimidobenzoyl-N- hydroxysuccinimide ester (MBS); N-succinimidyl (4-iodoacetyl) aminobenzoate (SIAB), succinimidyl 4-(p-maleimidophenyl) butyrate (SMPB), l-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) ; 4-succinimidyloxycarbonyl- α-methyl-α-(2-pyridyldithio)-tolune (SMPT), N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio) propionate (SPDP), succinimidyl 6-[3-(2-pyridyldithio) propionate] hexanoate (LC-SPDP) . Those cross-linking agents having N-hydroxysuccinimide moieties can be obtained as the N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide analogs, which generally have greater water solubility. In addition, those cross-linking agents having disulfide bridges within the linking chain can be synthesized instead as the alkyl derivatives so as to reduce the amount of linker cleavage in vivo. In addition to the heterobifunctional cross-linkers, there exists a number of other cross-linking agents including homobifunctional and photoreactive cross-linkers. Disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) , bismaleimidohexane (BMH) and dimethylpimelimidate*2 HC1 (DMP) are examples of useful homobifunctional cross-linking agents, and bis-[β-(4-azidosalicylamido)ethyl]disulfide (BASED) and N-succinimidyl-6(4'-azido-2'-nitrophenyl- amino)hexanoate (SANPAH) are examples of useful photoreactive cross-linkers for use in this invention. For a recent review of protein coupling techniques, see Means et al. (1990) Bioconjugate Chemistry 1:2-12, incorporated by reference herein. One particularly useful class of heterobifunctional cross-linkers, included above, contain the primary amine reactive group, N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) , or its water soluble analog N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (sulfo-NHS) . Primary amines (lysine epsilon groups) at alkaline pH's are unprotonated and react by nucleophilic attack on NHS or sulfo-NHS esters. This reaction results in the formation of an amide bond, and release of NHS or sulfo-NHS as a by-product. Another reactive group useful as part of a heterobifunctional cross-linker is a thiol reactive group. Common thiol reactive groups include maleimides, halogens, and pyridyl disulfides. Maleimides react specifically with free sulfhydryls (cysteine residues) in minutes, under slightly acidic to neutral (pH 6.5-7.5) conditions. Halogens (iodoacetyl functions) react with -SH groups at physiological pH's. Both of these reactive groups result in the formation of stable thioether bonds. The third component of the heterobifunctional cross-linker is the spacer arm or bridge. The bridge is the structure that connects the two reactive ends. The most apparent attribute of the bridge is its effect on steric hindrance. In some instances, a longer bridge can more easily span the distance necessary to link two complex biomolecules. For instance, SMPB has a span of 14.5 angstroms. Preparing protein-protein conjugates using heterobifunctional reagents is a two-step process involving the amine reaction and the sulfhydryl reaction. For the first step, the amine reaction, the protein chosen should contain a primary amine. This can be lysine epsilon amines or a primary alpha amine found at the N-terminus of most proteins. The protein should not contain free sulfhydryl groups. In cases where both proteins to be conjugated contain free sulfhydryl groups, one protein can be modified so that all sulfhydryls are blocked using for instance, N-ethylmaleimide (see Partis et al. (1983) J. Pro. Chem. 2:263, incorporated by reference herein). Ellman's Reagent can be used to calculate the quantity of sulfhydryls in a particular protein (see for example Ellman et al. (1958) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 74:443 and Riddles et al. (1979) Anal. Biochem. 94:75, incorporated by reference herein) . The reaction buffer should be free of extraneous amines and sulfhydryls. The pH of the reaction buffer should be 7.0-7.5. This pH range prevents maleimide groups from reacting with amines, preserving the maleimide group for the second reaction with sulfhydryls. The NHS-ester containing cross-linkers have limited water solubility. They should be dissolved in a minimal amount of organic solvent (DMF or DMSO) before introducing the cross-linker into the reaction mixture. The cross-linker/solvent forms an emulsion which will allow the reaction to occur. The sulfo-NHS ester analogs are more water soluble, and can be added directly to the reaction buffer. Buffers of high ionic strength should be avoided, as they have a tendency to "salt out" the sulfo-NHS esters. To avoid loss of reactivity due to hydrolysis, the cross-linker is added to the reaction mixture immediately after dissolving the protein solution. The reactions can be more efficient in concentrated protein solutions. The more alkaline the pH of the reaction mixture, the faster the rate of reaction. The rate of hydrolysis of the NHS and sulfo-NHS esters will also increase with increasing pH. Higher temperatures will increase the reaction rates for both hydrolysis and acylation. Once the reaction is completed, the first protein is now activated, with a sulfhydryl reactive moiety. The activated protein may be isolated from the reaction mixture by simple gel filtration or dialysis. To carry out the second step of the cross-linking, the sulfhydryl reaction, the protein chosen for reaction with maleimides, activated halogens, or pyridyl disulfides must contain a free sulfhydryl, usually from a cysteine residue. Free sulfhydryls can be generated by reduction of protein disulfides. Alternatively, a primary amine may be modified with Traut's Reagent to add a sulfhydryl (Blattler et al. (1985) Biochem 24:1517, incorporated by reference herein). Again, Ellman's Reagent can be used to calculate the number of sulfhydryls available in protein. In all cases, the buffer should be degassed to prevent oxidation of sulfhydryl groups. EDTA may be added to chelate any oxidizing metals that may be present in the buffer. Buffers should be free of any sulfhydryl containing compounds. Maleimides react specifically with -SH groups at slightly acidic to neutral pH ranges (6.5-7.5). A neutral pH is sufficient for reactions involving halogens and pyridyl disulfides. Under these conditions, maleimides generally react with -SH groups within a matter of minutes. Longer reaction times are required for halogens and pyridyl disulfides. The first sulfhydryl reactive-protein prepared in the amine reaction step is mixed with the sulfhydryl-containing protein under the appropriate buffer conditions. The protein-protein conjugates can be isolated from the reaction mixture by methods such as gel filtration or by dialysis. B. Recombinant Fusion Proteins The biocatalyst of this invention can be constructed as a fusion protein, containing the catalytic moiety and the binding agent as one contiguous polypeptide chain. In preparing the fusion protein, a fusion gene is constructed comprising DNA encoding the sequences for the binding agent, the catalytic moiety, and optionally, a peptide linker sequence to span the two fragments. To make this fusion protein, an entire enzyme can be cloned and expressed as part of the protein, or alternatively, a suitable fragment containing the catalytic moiety can be used. Likewise, the entire cloned coding sequence of a binding agent such as a receptor or antibody, or alternatively, a fragment of the molecule capable of binding the surface component of the pathogen can be used. The use of recombinant DNA techniques to create a fusion gene, with the translational product being the desired fusion protein, is well known in the art. Both the coding sequence of a gene and its regulatory regions can be redesigned to change the functional properties of the protein product, the amount of protein made, or the cell type in which the protein is produced. The coding sequence of a gene can be extensively altered -for example, by fusing part of it to the coding sequence of a different gene to produce a novel hybrid gene that encodes a fusion protein. Examples of methods for producing fusion proteins are described in PCT applications PCT/US87/02968, PCT/US89/03587 and PCT/US90/07335, as well as Traunecker et al. (1989) Nature 339:68, incorporated by reference herein. Techniques for making fusion genes are well known. Essentially, the joining of various DNA fragments coding for different polypeptide sequences is performed in accordance with conventional techniques, employing blunt-ended or stagger-ended termini for ligation, restriction enzyme digestion to provide for appropriate termini, filling in of cohesive ends as appropriate, alkaline phosphatase treatment to avoid undesirable joining, and enzymatic ligation. Alternatively, the fusion gene can be synthesized by conventional techniques including automated DNA synthesizers. To express the fusion protein molecule, it may be desirable to include transcriptional and translational regulatory elements and other non-coding sequences to the fusion gene construct. For instance, regulatory elements including constituitive and inducible promoters, enhancers or inhibitors can be incorporated. These regulatory control sequences include, for example, the lac system, the β-lactamase system, the trp system, the TAC system, the TRC system, the major operator and promoter regions of phage lambda, the promoters of the yeast α-mating factors, the SV40 early promoter, adenovirus late promoter, the GC box, the 72 Base pair repeats, the TATA box, the TAR transactivation sequence, the Shine-Dalgarno sequence, the IPTG inducible promoter, and other sequences known to control prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells or their viruses and various combinations thereof. For expression is eukaryotic systems, it may be necessary to include other non-coding sequences or regulatory elements such as intervening sequences and poly-adenylation signals. Those skilled in the art will recognize and understand how to make fusion genes containing elements important to regulatory control of transcription and translation. The fused genes encoding the binding agent and catalytic moiety can be ligated into a vector suitable for expression in either prokaryotic cells, eukaryotic cells, or both. Expression vehicles for production of the biocatalyst of this invention include plasmids or other vectors. For instance, suitable vectors for the fusion gene include plasmids of the types: pBR322, pEMBL plasmids, pEX plasmids, pBTac plasmids and pUC plasmids for expression in prokaryotic cells, such as E. coli. A number of vectors exist for the expression of recombinant proteins in yeast. For instance, YEP24, YIP5 and YRP17 are cloning and expression vehicles useful in the introduction of genetic constructs into S. cerevisiae. These vectors can replicate in E. coli due the presence of the pBR322 ori, and in S. cerevisiae due to the replication determinant of the yeast 2 micron plasmid. In addition, drug resistance markers such as ampicilin can be used. The preferred mammalian expression vectors contain both prokaryotic sequences to facilitate the propagation of the vector in bacteria, and one or more eukaryotic transcription units that are expressed in eukaryotic cells. The pSV2gpt, pSV2neo, pSV2-dhfr, pTk2, pRSVneo, pMSG, pSVT7, pko-neo and pHyg derived vectors are examples of mammalian expression vectors suitable for transfection of eukaryotic cells. These vectors are modified with sequences from bacterial plasmids such as pBR322 to facilitate replication and drug resistance selection in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Alternatively, derivatives of viruses such the bovine papillomavirus (BPV-1) , Epstein-Barr virus (pHEBo and p205) can be used for transient expression of proteins in eukaryotic cells. For other suitable expression systems for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic, see Molecular Cloning, 2nd Ed., ed. by Sambrook, Fritsch and Maniatis (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press:1989) incorporated by reference herein. In preferred embodiments, the expression vectors are chosen to include at least one selectable marker for each cell line in which the vector is to be replicated or expressed. For instance, the vectors can be derived with sequences conferring resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol or kanomycin to facilitate amplification in E. coli. For selection in mammalian cells, such markers as the mammalian expressible E. coli ecogpt gene -which codes for a xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (XGPRT) and allows selection of transfected HPRT ~ mammalian cells with mycophenolic acid- can be utilized. In the instance that the fusion protein is a hybrid molecule containing polypeptide sequences from a heavy or light chain from an antibody, fused to the polypeptide sequence of the catalytic moiety, it may be desirable to co-transfect and co-express the gene for the other chain of the antibody in the same cell. For example, if the fusion protein were a gamma heavy chain/trypsin hybrid, co-expression with the appropriate kappa or lambda light chain would facilitate the assembly of the antibody in vivo from the two exogenous transfected genes (see for example Rice et al. (1982) PNAS 79:7862; Oi et al. (1983) PNAS 80:825; and Morrison (1985) Science 229:1202, incorporated by reference herein) . It may necessary in some instances to introduce an unstructured polypeptide linker region between the catalytic moiety and binding agent fragments of the fusion protein. This linker can facilitate enhanced flexibility of the fusion protein allowing the catalytic moiety to freely interact with a surface component, reduce steric hindrance between the two fragments, as well as allow appropriate folding of each fragment to occur. The linker can be of natural origin, such as a sequence determined to exist in random coil between two domains of a protein. Alternatively, the linker can be of synthetic origin. For instance, the sequence (Gly4Ser)3 can be used as a synthetic unstructured linker. Linkers of this type are described in Huston et al. (1988) PNAS 85:4879; and U.S. Patent No. 5,091,513, both incorporated by reference herein. Naturally occurring unstructured linkers of human origin are preferred as they reduce the risk of immunogenicity. III. Methods of Testing Biocatalysts Upon making the biocatalysts of the present invention, it will be desirable to test their efficacy. In addition to assaying the ability to block pathogenesis, it is desirable to compare the effect of the biocatalyst with a comparable concentration of the catalytic moiety alone. Assays that are useful in scoring the efficiency and potency of the biocatalyst include both in vitro and in vivo assays. For example, in instances where the targeted surface component can be purified, the biocatalyst can be assessed by assays which measure binding to its cognate receptors where appropriate, or assays which monitor cleavage of the surface component, such as by SDS-PAGE. The ability to inhibit pathogenesis in cell cultures can also be scored. For virus and other obligate intracellular parasites, uptake by host cells can be monitored. Survival of extracellular parasites can also be monitored in cell-free media. Where appropriate, animal model systems can be used to assay in vivo effectiveness of the biocatalyst in preventing pathogenesis. For instance, mice or rats can be infected with a sample of pathogen that has been treated with the biocatalyst, with the catalytic moiety alone, or is untreated, and the pathologic manifestations of the pathogen can be assessed. IV. Biocatalysts directed against HIV One application of the biocatalyst of this invention is in the treatment of HIV. The pathogen-targeted biocatalyst is designed to specifically bind a surface component of the HIV virus, thus selectively delivering the enzymatic agent to a viral particle or infected cell expressing HIV coat proteins. For instance, a binding agent directed to the glycoproteins gpl20, gp41 or uncleaved gpl60 can be effective at targeting the catalytic moiety. The catalytic degradation of the structure of at least one of the HIV coat proteins can disrupt virion/host-cell and virally-infected-cell/host-cell interactions. As detailed earlier, the CD4/gpl20 interaction has been implicated in the mechanism of infectivity of the HIV virus. For the synthesis of a biocatalyst directed to the gpl20 protein, a number of binding agents are useful. For instance, antibodies or binding fragments thereof which specifically recognize an epitope on gpl20, or alternatively, a soluble fraction of the CD4 receptor capable of interacting with the CD4 binding site of gpl20, are both useful binding agents for directing a catalytic activity to an important binding determinant of the HIV virus. One embodiment of a biocatalyst directed to the abrogation of HIV-1 pathogenicity involves the directed cleavage of the V3 loop. For instance, a suitable protease such as thrombin or trypsin is chemically coupled to a soluble fragment of CD4 in a manner yielding an enzymatically active molecule. A soluble CD4 fragment comprising the two most N-terminal domains El and E2 (also commonly referred to as VI and V2) of CD4 is commercially available (American Biotechnologies, Inc. Catalog No. 013101). Alternatively, the most N-terminal domain, El (VI), can be cloned and expressed (see for example Poulin et al. (1991) J Virol 11:4893; and Chao et al. (1989) J Biol Chem 264:5812, incorporated by reference herein) . Chemical linkage of the protease to the purified sCD4 protein can be accomplished using the cross-linking agents as described above. Alternatively, instead of a chemical cross-linking agent, the HIV-1 biocatalyst can be constructed as a fusion protein. The extracellular fragment of CD4 exists as essentially 4 domains, with the two most N-terminal domains being implicated in the binding of gpl20 (Arthos et al. (1989) Cell 12:469; and Ashkenazi et al. (1990) PNAS 87:7150) . In fact, substantial gpl20 binding is accomplished by the fragment comprising the first 100 amino residues of the N-terminus (the El domain) . Between the El and E2 domain exists a short polypeptide sequence, approximately 10 residues long, which is believed to exist essentially as a random coil (Wang et al. (1990) Nature 348:411) . By ligating the gene coding for the protease or a catalytically active fragment thereof to the 3' end of the gene coding for the first 111 amino acid residues of CD4 (see Chao et al. (1989) J Biol Chem 264:5812) a non-structured polypeptide linker is incorporated. Appropriate expression vectors and host cells will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For both chemical and genetic fusion of the protease and sCD4 fragment, those skilled in the art will recognize the need to control the attachment site and the level of flexibility at the coupling site. Steric hindrance can affect the catalytic activity of the enzyme as well as the association constant for binding of the CD4 fragment. In choosing the cross-linking agents, the length of the linker bridge and the attachment sites to the protein molecules is of importance. For the construction of fusion proteins, the effect of heterogenous sequences on the folding of both the enzyme and the CD4 fragments should be considered. Other binding agents useful in the directed degradation of the V3 loop include antibodies directed against the CD4 binding site of gpl20 (see for example Tilley et al. (1991) Res Virol 142:247; Ohno et al. (1991) PNAS 11:10726; and Javaherian et al. (1990) Science 250:1590, incorporated by reference herein). These antibodies can be chimeric antibodies, or binding fragments as described above. Appropriate linkers will be apparent. A number of techniques have been developed that allow for screening the effectiveness of the biocatalyst constructs in. vitro. Examples of binding assays include: i) . ELISA-type assays in which CD4 binding to immobilized gpl20 is scored after treatment with either free enzyme or the biocatalyst construct. The immobilized gpl20 is incubated with either the enzyme or the biocatalyst construct. The enzyme or biocatalyst is then washed away, and the level of CD4 binding is measured either directly by using labeled sCD4 (such as FITC-labeled CD4 available from American Biotechnologies Inc. Catalog No 013003) or indirectly as in a sandwich-type assay using sCD4 followed by a labeled anti-CD4 antibody, ii). Competition binding assays in which the binding of labeled-gpl20 to sCD4 is scored against the binding of gpl20 treated with either free enzyme of the biocatalyst construct. In addition, in. vitro biological assays can be used to measure the ability of the biocatalyst to disrupt HIV infectivity. For instance, viral neutralization assays can be carried out in which cell cultures are incubated with viral stocks which have been treated *.ith the biocatalyst. The infectivity of biocatalyst-t aated virus, untreated virus, and virus treated with free enzyme can be assessed by means such as reverse transcriptase assays (Ohno et al. (1991) PNAS 11:10726) . Syncytium assays can also be used to assess the ability of the biocatalyst to inactivate CD4 binding of gpl20 relative to the free enzyme. Briefly, cells chronically infected with HIV-1 are incubated with dilutions of the biocatalyst. Cells susceptible to syncytia, such as C8166 cells are then added and incubated with the infected cells. Syncytium greater than three lymphocyte cell diameters score as positives, and the number of syncytium compared to that obtained with untreated infected cells or free-enzyme treated infected cells (Richman et al. (1990) AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Courier No 90-01, pages 6-9, incorporated by reference herein) . Most conventional approaches in designing HIV therapies directed to disrupting the gpl20/CD4 interaction have involved masking molecules such as soluble CD4 (sCD4) . One advantage of the present invention in targeting the degradation of the envelope protein gpl20 with the selective delivery of a catalytic moiety comes from the fact that normal function of the T cells in the immune system would not be affected. In the case of sCD4 therapy, the presence of large amounts of soluble CD4 or derivatives, due to the stoichiometric dependency of this therapy, could compete with the endogenous CD4 of the T cells and therefor adversely affect the performance of the cells in immune response. Indeed, for reasoned described above, the use of any masking molecules meant to bind determinants recognized by CD4 will encounter this problem. The approach of the present invention is more desirable in that the concentration of binding molecules can be considerably smaller due to the catalytic nature of action of the biocatalyst. The biocatalyst of the present invention can be delivered along with a pharmaceutically acceptable • carrier. Appropriate pharmaceutical carriers will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The dosage concentration of the biocatalyst is determined such that pathogenecity is abrogated. Factors involved in determining a dosage regimen for the administration of the biocatalyst include the minimum effective concentration as well as the clearance of the biocatalyst from circulation. These factors can be determined by the skilled artisan without undue experimentation. Example 1 A CD4 gene encoding an amino-terminal fragment of CD4 was constructed as follows. The oligonucleotides designated below as CD4-01 through CD4-16 were synthesized by standard nucleic acid synthesis techniques. CD4-01 AATTCATGAAGAAAGTAGTACTTGGCAAGAAA CD4-02 GGCGATACAGTGGAGCTCACGTGCACAGCTAGCCAGAAGAAGAGCATT CD4-03 CAATTCCACTGGAAGAACTCCAACCAGATTAAGATCCTTGGTAACCAA CD4-04 GGTAGCTTCTTAACTAAGGGCCCATCCAAGCTTAACGATCGCGCTGAC CD4-05 TCTCGTCGTAGCCTTTGGGACCAAGGTAACTTTCCAACTGATCATCAAG CD4-06 AATCTTAAGATCGAAGACTCTGATACGTATATCTGTGAAGTAGAGGAT CD4-07 CAGAAAGAGGAAGTTCAACTGCTAGTATTCGGCCTGACTGCCAACAGT CD4-08 GACACCCATCTGCTGCAGGGCTAATAG CD4-09 GATCCTATTAGCCCTGCAG CD4-10 CAGATGGGTGTCACTGTTGGCAGTCAGGCCGAATACTAGCAGTTGAAC CD4-11 TTCCTCTTTCTGATCCTCTACTTCACAGATATACGTATCAGAGTCTTC CD4-12 GATCTTAAGATTCTTGATGATCAGTGGAAAGTTACCTTGGTCCCAAAG CD4-13 GCTACGACGAGAGTCAGCGCGATCGTTAAGCTTGGATGGGCCCTTAGT CD4-14 TAAGAAGCTACCTTGGTTACCAAGGATCTTAATCTGGTTGGAGTTCTT CD4-15 CCAGTGGAATTGAATGCTCTTCTTCTGGCTAGCTGTGCACGTGAGCTC CD4-16 CACTGTATCGCCTTTCTTGCCAAGTACTACTTTCTTCATG 300 pmoles each of oligonucleotides CD4-1 through CD4-16 were mixed with ONE-PHORALL buffer (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) , 1 mM ATP (final Concentration) and 10 units of T4 Polynucleotide kinase (Pharmacia, Catalog No. 27-0736-01) in a reaction volume of 30 uL. The reaction mixture was incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. After phosphorylation of the oligonucleotides, the reaction tube was placed into a boiling water bath, the heater turned off, and the water bath allowed to cool to room temperature in order to facilitate annealing of complementary sequences within the olignucleotide mixture. After annealing, ligation buffer (BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) and 1 Unit T4 DNA ligase (BRL Catalog No. 52245B) was added to the tube and the tube held at room temperature for 4 hours. After ligation, 3 uL aliquots were removed and analyzed on a 1% agarose gel to verify assembly. The sequence of the final assembly is shown in Figure 1. The ligation mixture was cleaned once with phenolchloroform and once with chloroform, and the DNA was precipitated with 2 volumes EtOH. The pellet was resuspended in water and the CD4-DNA, as well as lug of pBluescript II KS (Stratagene, NJ) were digested with EcoRI and BamHI. After completion of the digest, the DNA was separated on an agarose gel, the bands cut out and purified with GENECLEAN. Equimolar concentrations of CD4 construct and vector (lOOng total) were ligated at 17°C for 16 hours. The ligated mix was then diluted 5X with water and 2uL of this mix were used to transform 50uL of competent JM109 cells. Example 2 The protein A "Z" domain/enterokinase cleavage recognition (EKCR) sequence/CD4 fusion gene was constructed as follows: The double stranded oligonucleotide 5'- AATTCCGACGACGATGACAAATC -3' 3'- GGCTGCTGCTACTGTTTAGGTAC -5' was digested with Ncol, and ligated to the BspHI site at the 5' end of the CD4 construct shown in Figure 1. The resulting EKCR/CD4 fusion gene was than ligated into the EcoRI and Sail sites of ρEZZ-18 (Pharmacia Catalog No. 27-4810-01) using the EcoRI and PstI overhangs created by treating the CD4 fusion gene with the corresponding restriction endonucleases. The pEZZ-18 vector contains the protein A signal sequence and two synthetic "Z" domains which are based on the "B" IgG binding domain of protein A. This construct allows "ZZ" fusion proteins to be secreted from E. Coli and to have increased solubility in aqueous environments. Thus, the resulting fusion gene encodes a ZZ/EKCR/CD4 fusion protein. The protein A sequences can be removed from CD4 by treatment of the resulting fusion protein with enterokinase. See Su et al. (1992) Biotechniques .13:756; and Forsberg et al. (1992) J Protein Chem 1.1:201, incorporated by reference herein. Example 3 A gene fragment encoding the catalytic domain of human tissue-Plasminogen Activator (tPA) was isolated by PCR amplification of a discrete portion of a human tPA cDNA clone. See Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2d Ed., ed. by Sambrook, Fritsch and Maniatis (CSH Press:1989), chapter 5, 6, and 14, incorporated by reference herin. Using the 5'-amplimer and 3'-amplimer shown in Figure 2, the catalytic domain fragment of tPA was amplified from the plasmid ptPA-trρl2 (ATCC No. 40404). See Pennica et al. (1983) Nature 301:214, incorporated by reference herein. The final amplification product contained the nucleotide sequence of Ser262 through Pro527. In addition, by design of the above amplimers, the 5' end of the amplification product included a Hindlll and an Nsil restriction endonuclease site, as well as the CD4 carboxy terminal sequence downstream of the PstI site in the CD4 construct of Figure 1. The 3' end of the amplification product, directly downstream of the stop codon for the tPA domain, contained an Xhol and a BamHI restriction endonuclease cleavage site. This amplified catalytic domain fragment was ligated into pBluescript II KS via its 5' Hindlll and 3" Xhol sites to create the replicable vector pBlutPA. (see Figure 3) Example 4 To create the CD4/tPA fusion gene, the tPA gene fragment was exicised from pBlutPA. The vector was first cut with Xhol and treated with Klenow to create a blunt end. Subsequently, the linearized vector was cut with Nsil leaving a 5' "sticky end". The products were run out on an agarose gel and the Nsil/Xhol tPA fragment isolated. Next, the pEZZEK/CD4 vector was digested with SphI then treated with T4 Polymerase to create blunt ends at the SphI cleavage site. The linearized vector was then cut with PstI, which cleaved at the PstI site indicated at the 3' end of the CD4 construct of Figure 1, and the remaining plasmid isolated. The Nsil/Xhol tPA fragment was then ligated into the Pstl/SphI treated pEZZEKCD4 plasmid to create the new vector pCD4/tPA. The vector pCD4/tPA (Figure 3) codes for a fusion protein having an overall fusion assembly including from amino terminus to carboxy terminus, the protein A secretory and "Z" domains, an enterokinase cleavage recognition sequence, a CD4 domain, and the catalytic domain of tPA. The nucleic acid sequence, and corresponding amino acid sequence, for the CD4/tPA portion of the fusion gene is shown in Figures 4A and 4B. Purified PCD4/tPA plasmid was used to transform competent XLl-Blue cells (Stratagene Catalog No. 200268). The transformed cells were cultured, and the CD4/tPA fusion protein isolated from the cell supernatant using an IgG Sepharose 6FF column. The "ZZ" domain is bound tightly by IgG Sepharose 6FF (Pharmicia Catalog No. 17-0909-01), thus allowing one-step purification of expressed proteins, see Lowenadler et al. (1987) Gene 58:87, incorporated by reference herein. The purified fusion protein was assayed and shown to have crude proteolytic activity by its ability to digestion casein in agar diffusion plates (Bio-Rad Catalog No. 500-0011) . Example 5 In a manner similar to that used in the construction of the CD4/tPA fusion protein, a CD4/thrombin fusion protein can be generated. Beginning with a human liver CDNA library (Stratagene Catalog No. 937200), a catalytic fragment of thrombin can be obtained by PCR amplification using the 5' and 3' amplimers shown in Figure 5. The PCR product includes Ile321 through Glu579 of thrombin (see Friezner et al. (1983) Biochemistry 22.:2087, incorporated by reference herein) as well as an Nsil endonuclease site and the carboxy-terminus of CD4 at its 5' end and an Xhol endonuclease site at its 3' end due to their presence in the PCR amplimers. As described above, the thrombin gene fragment can be ligated into pEZZEK/CD4 to yield a CD4/thrombin fusion gene. The sequence of the CD4/thrombin portion of the fusion gene and the corresponding amino acid sequence is given in Figures 6A and 6B. The Equivalents Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, numerous equivalents to the specific procedures described herein. Such equivalents are considered to be within the scope of this invention and are covered by the following claims.

Claims: Claims 1. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst, comprising a binding agent which specifically binds a surface component of the pathogen and a catalytic moiety which degrades a component of the pathogen such that pathogenicity is abrogated. 2. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 1, wherein the pathogen is a virus. 3. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 2, wherein the virus is HIV. 4. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 1, wherein the pathogen is a virus and the surface component is a viral envelope protein. 5. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 4, wherein the virus is HIV and the surface component is gpl20. 6. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 1, wherein the binding agent is an antibody, or a binding fragment thereof, specific for the surface component of the pathogen. 7. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 6, wherein the antibody or binding fragment thereof, is selected from the group consisting of: a) an individual chain antibody of heavy chain origin; b) an individual chain antibody of light chain origin; c) a variable region or portion thereof from an L chain (VL) or an H chain (VJJ) ; c) an Fab, Fv, sFv or F(ab)2 fragment; and d) an HL monovalent fragment. 8. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 1, wherein the binding agent is a receptor, or binding domain thereof, for the surface component of the pathogen. 9. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 1, wherein the binding agent is selected from the group consisting of polycationic molecules, polyanionic molecules and hydrophobic molecules. 10. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 1, wherein the binding agent is a polyanionic molecule selected from the group consisting of polynucleotides, polysaccharides and polyanionic peptides. 11. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 1, wherein the pathogen is HIV and the binding agent is a portion of CD4 sufficient to bind gpl20. 12. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 1, wherein the catalytic moiety is an enzyme, or a catalytically-active fragment thereof. 13. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 12, wherein the enzyme, or catalytically-active fragment thereof, is selected from the group consisting of proteases, lipases and glycosidases 14. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 12, wherein the enzyme is a protease selected from the group consisting of serine proteases, cysteine proteases, acid proteases or metalloproteases. 15. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 1, wherein the pathogen-targeted biocatalyst is a fusion protein. 16. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 1, wherein the binding agent and the catalytic moiety are covalently joined by a chemical cross-linking agent. 17. A virus-targeted biocatalyst, comprising a binding agent specific for a surface component of the virus and an enzyme, or a catalytically- active fragment thereof, which degrades a surface component sufficiently to abrogate viral pathogenicity. 18. A virus-targeted biocatalyst of claim 17, wherein the virus is HIV. 19. A virus-targeted biocatalyst of claim 18, wherein the binding agent is an antibody, or fragment thereof, which is specific for gpl20. 20. A virus-targeted biocatalyst of claim 18, wherein the binding agent is CD4, or a gpl20 binding domain thereof. 21. A virus-targeted biocatalyst of claim 20, wherein the gρl20 binding domain of CD4 is selected from the group consisting of the El through E2 domain of CD4 and the El domain of CD4 22. A virus-targeted biocatalyst of claim 17, wherein the enzyme, or a catalytically-active fragment thereof, is chosen from the group consisting of proteases, lipases and glycosidases. 23. A virus-targeted biocatalyst of claim 17, wherein the virus-targeted biocatalyst is a fusion protein. 24. A virus-targeted biocatalyst of claim 17, wherein the binding agent and the enzyme, or a catalytically-active fragment thereof, are covalently joined by a chemical cross-linking agent. 25. A biocatalyst targeted to HIV, comprising a binding agent specific for gpl20 coupled to a protease, or a catalytically-active fragment thereof, which degrades gpl20 sufficiently to abrogate- HIV pathogenicity. 26. An HIV-1-targeted biocatalyst of claim 25, wherein the binding agent is an antibody, or a fragment thereof, specific for gpl20. 27. An HIV-1-targeted biocatalyst of claim 25, wherein the binding agent is specific for the CD4 region of gpl20. 28. An HIV-targeted biocatalyst of claim 25, wherein the binding agent is CD4, or a gpl20 binding domain thereof. 29. An HIV-targeted biocatalyst of claim 28, wherein the gpl20 binding domain of CD4 is selected from the group consisting of the El through E2 domain of CD4 and the El domain of CD4 30. An HIV-targeted biocatalyst of claim 25, wherein the HIV-targeted biocatalyst is a fusion protein. 31. An HIV-1-targeted biocatalyst of claim 25, wherein the binding agent and the protease, or catalytic domain thereof, are covalently joined by a chemical cross-linking agent. 32. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst, comprising a fusion protein comprising A. a binding agent which specifically binds a surface component of a pathogen, and B. a catalytic moiety which degrades a component of the pathogen wherein degradation of the component of the pathogen by the biocatalyst results in abrogation of pathogenecity. 33. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 32, wherein the fusion protein further comprises a linker sequence linking the binding agent and the catalytic moiety. 34. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 32, wherein the linker sequence is a synthetic or naturally occuring unstructured peptide sequence. 35. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 32, wherein: A. the pathogen is HIV, B. the binding agent is selected from the group consisting of an antibody specific for gpl20, an antibody fragment specific for gpl20, CD4, and a fragment of CD4 which specifically binds gpl20, and C. the catalytic moiety is selected from the group consisting of proteases, lipases, and glycosidases wherein selective degradation of gpl20 results in abrogation of HIV infectivity. 36. A pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 35, wherein the fusion protein further comprises a linker sequence between the binding agent and the catalytic moiety. 37. A hybrid DNA encoding the pathogen-targeted biocatalyst of claim 32, comprising DNA encoding a binding agent which specifically binds a surface component of the pathogen and DNA encoding a catalytic moiety which degrades a component of the pathogen such that pathogenicity is abrogated. 38. A biocatalyst targeted to HIV, comprising a fusion protein including the amino acid sequence of Figures 4A and 4B or a function portion thereof or a substantial homolog thereof. 05 39. A biocatalyst target to HIV, comprising a fusion protein including the amino acid sequence of Figures 6A and 6B or a functional portion thereof or a substantial homolog thereof.

Inventors: CREA ROBERTO, CREA, ROBERTO
Applicants: CREAGEN INC, CREAGEN, INC.
Application year: 1993
Main classification: C12N15
IPC codes: A61K38, A61K47, C07K14, C12N9, C12N15