Apparatus for connecting two fiber distributed data interface rings

Abstract: In standard token-based LANs (e.g., FDDI, Token Ring) an equal share of the ring bandwidth is made available to each node. Certain nodes (e.g., bridges, routers, servers) require a larger representation (bandwidth) than other nodes. A surrogate (bridge/router) node is presented which achieves this in a standard compliant manner. The bridge/router may serve as a surrogate on each ring representing multiple stations from the other ring. The multiplicity of stations is adjusted either statically or dynamically to provide sufficient added bandwidth to the surrogate to reduce delay and packet loss characteristic of the conventional single station bridge or router. The increased bandwidth utilization and FDDI ring performance resulting from the implementation of this invention is transparent to the individual stations and the ring in a way that is advantageous to both single media and multimedia usages within defined network local and non-local areas.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention The present invention generally relates to local area networks (LANs) and, more particularly, to networks using a timed token protocol and to interconnecting devices on such networks, such as servers, bridges, and routers. Description of the Prior Art The interconnection and interoperation of distributed computing devices is an old but continuing challenge. In recent years many of those who have thought about this challenge have concluded that the most effective way to promote progress is to parse the task into relatively independent but connected pieces and develop a corresponding set of standards. Different systems can then communicate if they follow the standards at their corresponding levels; they may rely upon parallel coordination through standards at other levels to complete the communication path. The Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) reference model reflects this view. The OSI model defines seven layers -- from the physical link dealing with mechanical, electrical and optical characteristics of signals to the application layer which provides file transfer and network management services to users. Local area network (LAN) standards within the OSI model are the subject matter and constraints for the present invention. Local area networks are characterized by a topology (e.g ring or bus) for connecting devices to the LAN's signal transmission medium (e.g. cable or optical fiber) and a protocol (e.g. token-ring or timed-token) for controlling access to the medium by an attached device. Communication capacity over a LAN is limited by the transmission medium, and also by the topology and the relevant protocols at both the physical and media access control levels. "Bandwidth" is a measure of the communication capacity of a LAN, and is commonly given in bits per second. For example, the bandwidth of a coaxial cable Ethernet LAN may be 10 million bits per second (Mbps) while a Fiber optical Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) Lan using a timed-token protocol may be 100 Mbps. However, these figures are nominal capacities. Typically, the aggregate communication needs of devices attached to a LAN are an irregular mix of stream and bursty traffic. The LAN's capacity may be underutilized at one time and overloaded at another. IEEE S ON COMMUNICATIONS COM-33, no.10, October 1985, New York, US, pages 1058 - 1065, BUX et al. : "Flow Control in Local-Area Networks of Interconnected Token Rings" relates to flow control issues in local area networks consisting of multiple token rings interconnected through bridges. To achieve high throughput, bridges perform only a very simple routing and store-and-forward function, but are not involved in error- or flow- control. In case of congestion, bridges discard arriving frames, which will be recovered though an appropriate end-to-end protocol between the communicating stations. The end-to-end protocol considered is the IEEE 802.2 type-2 logical-link-control (LLC) protocol. Extensive simulations show that performance can be severely degraded if, in such a network, the LLC protocol is employed as defined in 1985. Therefore, an enhancement to this protocol is suggested in the form of a dynamic flow-control algorithm. This enhancement guarantees, according to the author, close to optimal network performance under both normal traffic load and overload conditions. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide fairer representation of all the stations on each LAN across other LANs connected by a bridge/router, improving upon the representation that is provided by the MAC protocol to a single station, in conformance to Standards, without violating the applicable protocol. A further object of the invention is to reduce the delay, buffering, and packet loss across a bridge/router. It is also an object of the invention to provide more bandwidth to a server, bridge, or router than available to a single station on the LAN by acting as a surrogate on the LAN for all the stations connected to it. A further object of the invention to increase throughput by circulating multiple tokens through different sections of the network. An additional object of the invention is to increase the chance of a successful transmission and to improve reliability. The above objectives can be achieved by constructing a bridge/router such that it effectively behaves as one or more virtual stations on each of the LANs it connects to, as shown in Figure 4. This may be based on the number of station on each LAN or the traffic patterns between LANs. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which: Figure 1 is a block diagram showing a bridge or router interconnecting two LANs; Figure 2 is a block diagram showing the media access control (MAC) component of a conventional bridge or a router; Figure 3 is a graph showing bandwidth available to a conventional bridge/router using the timed token protocol; Figure 4 is a block diagram showing a bridge/router with multiple virtual MACs in accordance with the invention; Figure 5 is a graph showing bandwidth available to bridge/router using multiple virtual MACs; and Figure 6 is a block diagram of the apparatus that implements virtual MACs. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION The present invention is an apparatus for interconnecting networks that utilize a token based protocol (e.g., Fiber optic Distributed Data Interface or FDDI) so as to increase the effective bandwidth available to a station, remaining in conformance with standards. Bridges and routers have been used for establishing communication links between stations on different networks. A summary of prior art of bridges and routers is published in IEEE Network Magazine, January 1988-Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 57-64, and in the Handbook of Computer Communications Standards, By W. Stallings, Vol. 2, pp. 207-234. These describe the operation of a bridge between two LANs, A and B, as shown in Figure 1. This operation is summarized as follows: Read all frames transmitted on A, and accept those addressed to stations on B. Using the media access control protocol for B, retransmit the frames onto B. Do the same for B-to-A traffic. Over a short period of time, frames may arrive at the bridge faster then they can be transmitted. Each bridge is a single station on each of the networks that it connects to and transmits frames onto the network in accordance with a media access control (MAC) protocol. This is shown in Figure 2. The main difference between a router and a bridge is that the router reads only packets explicitly addressed to it and determines the LAN onto which it should be transmitted. Thus, as in the bridge case, frames may arrive faster than they can be transmitted. Moreover, a router is also a single station on each of the networks to which it is connected. A summary of the MAC protocols for various network standards is described in the Handbook of Computer Communications Standards, supra, Chapters 1-7. Due to the fairness algorithms embedded in the timed-token protocol, the amount of time available to a bridge or a router (indicated by BR in Figure 3) for transmission is the same as that for any other station on the LAN. For the network of Figure 1, the time available for a conventional bridge/router to transmit data is shown in Figure 3. At point 1 in Figure 3, the bridge/router may start transmission of packets and can transmit for up to full target token rotation time (TTRT) (point 2 in Figure 3), before releasing the token. Once the token goes around the ring, it may be captured by station X at point 3 in Figure 3. Now, station X can transmit for up to a full TTRT and so on. The concept applies to a simple token-based protocol used in Token Ring networks. Therefore, for the example of Figure 1, if LAN A is heavily loaded and there is considerable traffic from LAN B to LAN A, packets may be dropped by the bridge/router. The packets that are not dropped may encounter high delay. The packet loss and high delays are undesirable features of the bridge/router. For example, in the network of Figure 1, if LAN A has N A stations and LAN B has N B stations, the bridge/router will act as if it is N B virtual stations on LAN A and N A virtual stations on LAN B, as illustrated in Figure 4. Thus, the bandwidth available to station X on LAN A for transmission to LAN B over the bridge/router will be same as if the station X was on LAN B. This is exemplified in Figure 5, where the bridge/router has N B *TTRT seconds of transmission time on LAN A while other stations (station X in Figure 1) have only TTRT seconds transmission time (out of {N A + N B * TTRT} seconds). The ring interface of such an apparatus, as shown in Figure 6, comprises: 1. A Surrogate Counter (SC). The number of virtual stations that the bridge/router represents is given by SC max . The SC counter indicates the number of virtual station available for data transmission. The counter is decremented at each capture of the token followed by a transmission. Once the bridge forwards a token without capturing it (no data to be transmitted), the counter SC is reset to SC max . 2. A Media Access Element (MAE) with an Adjustable Token Rotation Timer (ATRT). This element captures the token and transmits frames until either the Token Rotation Timer expires, or it no longer has data (whichever occurs first). By controlling the Token Rotation Timer this element can be made to behave as a multiplicity of stations by allowing it to capture the token on successive token rotations before giving a downstream neighbor a chance to send (this only affects asynchronous traffic). Upon expiration of the Token Rotation Timer the token is released, and the Timer is reset if the Surrogate Counter is greater than 1 and there is still data in the Data Buffer. 3. The Frame Buffer Controller (FBC). The status of the Frame Buffer is used to set the Surrogate Counter in order to dictate how many stations the MAE is to represent. The method for dynamic determination of the maximum value for the Surrogate Counter SC max is as follows, with reference to Figure 6: 1. The FBC measures the quantity of data to be transmitted and forwards this estimate to the MAE. 2. The MAE can now set SC max to as many virtual MAC entities as are required and place them in the token path in order to increase the token acquisition opportunities on the ring and expedite the transmission of the data in the Frame Buffer. A static determination of the maximum value for the Surrogate Counter SC max can be achieved by identifying the number of stations connected to each LAN using Station Management (SMT) capability and using a fraction of the number of stations to set the value of SC max . For FDDI, this apparatus is especially desirable within a bride/router where several stations on one side of the bridge/router are represented on the opposite side ring through the bridge/router. Those stations being represented by the bridge/router will appear, to all other stations on the ring, as though they are physically attached to the ring. Consequently, the bridge/router has bandwidth available for all the stations that it connects to (represents). However, it does not have to incur the costs of true physical connections that the additional attachments would require would they actually be attached to the ring (e.g., latency, BER, etc.). These stations can be represented virtually by simple manipulation of the bridge/router's MAC timer (ATRT - similar to the FDDI token rotation timer). A counter, SC, must be initialized to the number of stations that are to be represented. When the Token arrives, the bridge/router behaves as the first station on the surrogate counter (SC) list (i.e., point 1 in Figure 5). Using its MAC timer the bridge/router determines the amount of asynchronous bandwidth available and transmits data for that duration given by ATRT (until point 2 in Figure 5). Once the timer expires the token is released and SC is decremented (point 2 in Figure 5). If SC > 0, then the bridge/router's ATRT timer is reset. Upon the next token rotation, the bridge/router may again capture the token as though it were the next station on the surrogate counter (SC) list (point 3 in Figure 5). Once the ATRT timer expires (point 4 in Figure 5) the token is released and SC is decremented, SC = SC - 1. The ATRT timer will again be reset if SC > 0. This will terminate when SC = 0 (point 5 in Figure 5) and the next station (X in Figure 1) on the ring will have the opportunity to utilize the available asynchronous bandwidth (point 6 in Figure 5). At this time, SC will be set to the number of stations the bridge/router represents (SC max ). By adjusting SC max , any number of stations can be represented. In order to avoid violating the FDDI Standards, a surrogate should not represent more stations than are actually attached to the LAN. The number of stations that bridge/router represents may be adjusted statically or dynamically. For the static determination, using station management (SMT) capability of FDDI, the bridge/router will determine the exact number of stations on each of the LANs it connects to. Then, a predetermined fraction of that number (representative of the inter-LAN traffic) will be used to initialize the value of SC. Alternately, the value of SC may be adjusted dynamically based on the state of the buffers in the bridge/router. Two threshold values, T H and T L , may be used for the buffers. When the buffer occupancy exceeds T H , SC max is incremented and when buffer occupancy goes below T L , SC max is decremented. The predetermined upper and lower bounds may be used to ensure certain service criteria (for example SC max should be at least one).

Claims: An apparatus for adjusting the asynchronous bandwidth made available to a surrogate station (BR) operating in both first (A) and second (B) rings of stations in a communication network employing a timed token protocol charaterized in that it comprises : a surrogate counter (SC) having a maximum value, said surrogate counter being reset to said maximum value when said surrogate station forwards a token without capturing it, said surrogate counter being decremented by one when said surrogate station forwards a token after capturing it; and a media access element (MAE) having an adjustable token rotation timer (ATRT), said timer being reset when said surrogate station detects a token, said timer being reset again when said surrogate station forwards a token, if said surrogate counter is greater than zero. The apparatus of Claim 1, said maximum value being the number of stations from said second ring (B) represented on said first ring by said surrogate station (BR), said represented number being a predetermined fraction of the total number of stations on said second ring, said predetermined fraction being chosen so that said represented number is representative of communication traffic between said first ring and said second ring. The apparatus of Claim 1, further comprising a data buffer for storing overflow communication traffic between said first ring (A) and said second ring (B) and threshold means for storing a high threshold value for the amount of data stored in said data buffer, such that when said high threshold value is exceeded said maximum value of said surrogate counter (SC) is incremented, said threshold means further storing a low threshold value, such that when said low threshold value exceeds the amount of data stored in said data buffer said maximum value of said surrogate counter is decremented, said maximum value never being decremented below a minimum value of one.

Inventors: HERZBERG LOUIS PAUL, PATEL BAIJU VITTHALBHAI, RUIZ ANTONIO, SCHAFFA FRANCK ANDRE, WILLEBEEK-LEMAIR MARC HUBERT, HERZBERG, LOUIS PAUL, PATEL, BAIJU VITTHALBHAI, RUIZ, ANTONIO, SCHAFFA, FRANCK ANDRE, WILLEBEEK-LEMAIR, MARC HUBERT
Applicants: IBM, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Application year: 1993
Main classification: H04L12
IPC codes: H04L12