A polarization detector

Abstract: A polarization detector of the present invention includes: a polarization diffraction element (111) having a substrate with two facing surfaces which are placed in parallel with each other, a first diffraction (112) grating formed on one surface of the substrate, and a second diffraction (113) grating formed on the other surface of the substrate, light being incident upon the first diffraction grating, each grating pitch of the first diffraction grating and the second diffraction grating being nearly equal to a wavelength of the incident light; a limiting member for limiting an incident region of the incident light with respect to the polarization diffraction element, formed on a light incident side of the first diffraction grating; a converging lens (120) for respectively converging light transmitted through the first diffraction grating and the second diffraction grating and light diffracted by the first diffraction grating and the second diffraction grating into different beam spots; and a pair of photodetectors (130a,130b) for detecting each optical intensity of the two beam spots converged by the converging lens.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention: The present invention relates to a polarization detector used for optical pickup and the like, and more particularly to a polarization detector equipped with a polarization diffraction element for separating an incident light into two light beams with different polarization components. 2. Description of the Related Art: Figure 8 shows a cross-sectional view of a polarization diffraction element 100 . The polarization diffraction element 100 includes a transparent substrate 101 made of glass or the like, on one surface of which a diffraction grating 102 represented by hatching is formed. The grating pitch of the diffraction grating 102 is formed so as to nearly correspond to the wavelength of the light to be used. For example, the diffraction grating 102 is formed of a photoresist, having a thickness of 1 µm and a grating pitch of 0.5 µm. The diffraction grating 102 is formed by a two-beam interference method or the like. When the grating pitch of the diffraction grating 102 is formed so as to be nearly equal to a light wavelength, as described above, the following polarization characteristics are known to be obtained. (See K. Yokomori, "Dielectric Surface-Relief Gratings with High Diffraction Efficiency", Applied Optics Vol. 23, No. 14, pp. 2303, 1984.) As shown by the arrow in Figure 8 , the diffraction grating 102 of the polarization diffraction element 100 having the above-mentioned structure allows a P-polarized light L P to pass therethrough at nearly 100% and an S-polarized light L S to diffract at nearly 100%. The P-polarized light L P has an electrical field which vibrates in the vertical direction of Figure 8 . The S-polarized light L S has an electrical field which vibrates in the normal direction with respect to the sheet surface. When light L , for example, having a wavelength of 0.8 µm is incident upon the above-mentioned polarization diffraction element 100 , the P-polarized light L P passes through the diffraction grating 102 as a zeroth-order diffracted light L a but is hardly diffracted as a first-order diffracted light L b . On the other hand, the S-polarized light L S is diffracted by the diffraction grating 102 as a first-order diffracted light L b but hardly passes through the diffraction grating 102 as a zeroth-order diffracted light L a . As a polarization diffraction element used for optical pickup of a magneto-optical element utilizing the above-mentioned polarization characteristics, Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 2-259702 by the present inventors discloses a polarization diffraction element, a polarization detector, etc. These polarization diffraction elements have a structure formed by considering the influence of wavelength fluctuation of an incident light, the configuration in the case where a polarization detector including a photodetector is constituted, the improvement of the degree of separation of P- and S-polarized lights. Figure 9 shows an example of the above-mentioned polarization diffraction element. A polarization diffraction element 110 includes a transparent flat substrate 111 made of glass or the like, and on both surfaces of the substrate 111 , a first diffraction grating 112 and a second diffraction grating 113 are formed, respectively. A grating pitch D 1 of the first diffraction grating 112 and a grating pitch D 2 of the second diffraction grating 113 are set so as to nearly equal to the wavelength λ of the incident light L . In addition, the groove direction of the first and second diffraction gratings 112 and 113 corresponds to the direction of a normal line with respect to a sheet surface of Figure 9 . Figure 10 is a cross-sectional view of the first and second diffraction gratings 112 and 113 . As shown in this figure, the first diffraction grating 112 has a plurality of sinusoidal convex portions 112a with the grating pitch D 1 , each grating pitch D 1 being the same, and the second diffraction grating 113 has a plurality of sinusoidal convex portions 113a with the grating pitch D 2 , each grating pitch D 2 being the same. In this case, the grating pitch D 2 is set so as to be slightly larger than the grating pitch D 1 . The first diffraction grating 112 and the second diffraction grating 113 can be formed as a relief type diffraction grating by, for example, etching the substrate 111 . The operation of the polarization diffraction element 110 with the above-mentioned structure will be described. The first diffraction grating 112 and the second diffraction grating 113 allow the P-polarized light L p of the incident light L to pass therethrough at nearly 100%, and allow the S-polarized light L S to diffract at nearly 100%. Since the grating pitch D 2 is larger than the grating pitch D 1 , in the case where the incident light L with a predetermined wavelength is incident upon the polarization diffraction element 110 through the first diffraction grating 112 , the following is caused: as shown by an arrow in Figure 9 , a transmitted light L c transmitted through the first and second diffraction gratings 112 and 113 and a diffracted light L d diffracted by the first and second diffraction gratings 112 and 113 come out of the polarization diffraction element 110 so as to have a difference of angle α in a direction separating from each other. At this time, the incident light L is incident upon the first diffraction grating 112 at an incident angle  1 , and the S-polarized light L S of the incident light L is diffracted in a direction so as to form an angle  2 with respect to a normal line n of the polarization diffraction element 110 . In addition, the S-polarized light L S is diffracted in a direction so as to form an angle  3 with respect to a normal line n and comes out of the polarization diffraction element 110 . In this case, the difference of angle α is represented by  1 -  3 . Moreover, the angles  1 ,  2 , and  3 satisfy the following Formula (1): Sin 1 + Sin 2 = λ/D 1 Sin 2 + Sin 3 = λ/D 2 where λ is an oscillation wavelength of the incident light. Figure 11 is a front view schematically showing a polarization detector equipped with the polarization diffraction element 110 which functions as described above. The polarization detector includes the polarization diffraction element 110 , a converging lens 120 for converging light which comes out of the polarization diffraction element 110 , and a pair of photodetectors 130a and 130b for detecting the intensity of light converged by the converging lens 120 . The pair of photodetectors 130a and 130b are provided in one package 130 . In the polarization detector with the above-mentioned structure, a data signal is given to the polarization diffraction element 110 as the incident light L , and the incident light L is separated into the P-polarized light L P and the S-polarized light L S by the polarization diffraction element 110 , as described above, and comes out of the polarization diffraction element 110 . The outgoing light is converged on the photodetectors 130a and 130b by the converging lens 120 , whereby the optical signal is converted into an electrical signal by the photodetectors 130a and 130b . In the above-mentioned polarization diffraction element 110 , the difference between the grating pitch D 1 of the first diffraction grating 112 and the grating pitch D 2 of the second diffraction grating 113 is very small. Thus, the fluctuation of the difference of angle α caused by the wavelength fluctuation of the incident light L as shown in Figure 9 is small and there is an effect that a positional shift of beam spots converged on the photodetectors 130a and 130b can be prevented. A small-sized and light-weight optical pickup device has been realized by incorporating the polarization detector into the optical pickup. However, in the above-mentioned polarization detector, a reflected light generated in the polarization diffraction element 110 and the incident light L cause interference. Because of this, the intensity of light from the polarization diffraction element 110 is fluctuated and a noise is caused in the signal reproduced by the photodetectors 130a and 130b , deteriorating the quality of the signal. This problem will be described in detail as follows: Figure 12A is a cross-sectional view showing the polarization diffraction element 110 . Figure 12B shows the shape of beam spots on the first diffraction grating 112 . As shown in Figure 12A , the S-polarized light L S of the incident light L with respect to the polarization diffraction element 110 is diffracted by the first diffraction grating 112 to become a first-order diffracted light L 1 . Moreover, the first-order diffracted light L 1 is separated into an outgoing light L 3 and a reflected light L 2 . The outgoing light L 3 is light which undergoes the first order diffraction by the second diffraction grating 113 . The reflected light L 2 is light which is reflected from the second diffraction grating 113 . Because of this, as shown in Figure 12B , two beam spots of the incident light L (mainly, the S-polarized light L S ) and the reflected light L 2 are formed, and the light which corresponds to an overlapped portion of both of the beam spots is an interference light L i . As shown in Figure 12A , among the interference light L i , a light L i1 reflected from the first diffraction grating 112 undergoes first-order diffraction by the second diffraction grating 113 to become a light L i2 , and the light L i2 is irradiated to the photodetector 130b (not shown in Figure 12A ) together with the original S-polarized light L S . As described above, the intensity of the interference light L i proceeding to the photodetector 130b is determined by the phase difference between the reflected light L 2 from the first diffraction grating 112 and the S-polarized light L S of the incident light L . The phase difference depends on an oscillation wavelength of a semiconductor laser which is the light source of the incident light L . However, since the oscillation wavelength of the laser fluctuates, the phase difference also fluctuates, resulting in the fluctuation of the intensity of the interference light L i . The fluctuation of the light intensity causes a noise in the data signal transmitted through the polarization diffraction grating 110, deteriorating the quality of the signal. The reason for the fluctuation of the semiconductor laser is as follows: the semiconductor laser is sensitive to backward light, so that in the case where the semiconductor laser is used for optical pickup, a laser driving current is overlapped with a high frequency current for the purpose of suppressing the backward light. In the case of the P-polarized light L p of the incident light L, assuming that the incident angle of the zeroth-order diffraction light with respect to the second diffraction grating 113 is about 35°, a reflected light is hardly generated as shown in Figure 13. Thus, the above-mentioned problems do not arise. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The polarization detector according to the present invention is defined in claim 1. Features of embodiments of the invention are defined in claims 2 to 14. Thus, the invention described herein makes possible the advantage of providing a polarization detector in which a satisfactory data signal with less noise component is detected even though a laser driving current to be applied to an optical source is overlapped with a high frequency current, by preventing the interference between the incident light and the diffracted reflected light of the incident light or by minimizing the influence of the interference. This and other advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading and understanding the following detailed description with reference to the accompanying figures. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a plan view schematically showing the periphery of a polarization diffraction element in a polarization detector of the first example according to the present invention. Figure 2A is a schematic plan view of an aperture, illustrating the operation in the case where a spherical wave is incident upon the polarization diffraction element shown in Figure 1 . Figure 2B is a schematic plan view of the polarization diffraction element, illustrating the operation in the case where a spherical wave is incident upon the polarization diffraction element shown in Figure 1 . Figure 2C is a schematic view of beam spots on a first diffraction grating, illustrating the operation in the case where a spherical wave is incident upon the polarization diffraction element shown in Figure 1 . Figure 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the width W of an aperture A and the noise level in the polarization detector shown in Figure 1 . Figure 4A is a plan view schematically showing the periphery of the polarization diffraction element, illustrating an application of the first example. Figure 4B is a plan view schematically showing the periphery of the polarization diffraction element, illustrating another application of the first example. Figure 5A shows an exemplary shape of an aperture opening used in the polarization detector shown in Figure 1 . Figure 5B shows another exemplary shape of the aperture opening used in the polarization detector shown in Figure 1 . Figure 5C shows another exemplary shape of the aperture opening used in the polarization detector shown in Figure 1 . Figure 6 is a plan view schematically showing the periphery of the polarization diffraction element in a polarization detector of the second example according to the present invention. Figure 7 is a plan view schematically showing the application of the polarization diffraction element of the second example according to the present invention. Figure 8 is a plan view showing a conventional polarization diffraction element having polarization characteristics. Figure 9 is a plan view showing a polarization diffraction element used in the conventional polarization detector. Figure 10 is a cross-sectional view showing a diffraction grating of the polarization diffraction element shown in Figure 9 . Figure 11 is a plan view schematically showing the conventional polarization detector using the polarization diffraction element shown in Figure 9 . Figure 12A is a schematic plan view showing the polarization diffraction element shown in Figure 9 , illustrating the operation of light therein. Figure 12B is a schematic view showing beam spots on the first diffraction grating, illustrating the operation of light in the polarization diffraction element shown in Figure 9 . Figure 13 is a graph showing the relationship between the incident angle and the reflectivity in the polarization diffraction element having polarization characteristics. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention will be described by way of illustrating examples with reference to the drawings. Example 1 Figure 1 is a plan view schematically showing part of a polarization diffraction element in a polarization detector of the first example. The polarization detector has an aperture A on the side of a first diffraction grating 12 of a polarization diffraction element 10 having the same structure as that of the polarization diffraction element 110 shown in Figure 9 . Light is incident upon the first diffraction grating 12 . The aperture A is provided for the purpose of limiting an incident area of incident light L . The aperture A limits the incident area of the incident light L with respect to the polarization diffraction element 10 in terms of the width of the incident light L in the vertical direction on a sheet surface of Figure 1 . The width W of the aperture A is determined by calculation as follows: Among the incident light L , the uppermost light which is diffracted by the first diffraction grating 12 becomes a first-order diffraction light L 1 , and among the first-order diffraction light L 1 , light which is reflected from a second diffraction grating 13 becomes a reflected light L 2 and reaches a point P on the first diffraction element 12 . In order to prevent the interference of light in the polarization diffraction element 10 , the incident light L should not be incident upon the point P . Thus, if the width W is set so as to satisfy the following Formula (2), the interference of light in the polarization diffraction element 10 is not caused. W < 2t 0 · tan 2 · sin 1 where t 0 is the thickness of a substrate 11 of the polarization diffraction element;  1 is an incident angle with respect to the polarization diffraction element 10 ;  2 is a diffraction angle of the incident light by the first diffraction grating 12 (in the substrate 11 ); and  1 is 90° -  1 . In the polarization detector with the above-mentioned structure, even though the laser driving current to be applied to the optical source is overlapped with a high frequency current, the outgoing light of an S-polarized light in the polarization diffraction element 10 is not fluctuated by the fluctuation of a wavelength of the incident light L . Thus, the noise level of a signal in a photodetector (not shown) can be decreased. As described later, for practical use, even though the width W is twice the maximum value determined by the above-mentioned Formula (2), the noise level can sufficiently be decreased. More specifically, the same effects can be obtained, even when the width W is set so as to satisfy the following Formula (3): W < 4t 0 · tan 2 · sin 1 The reason why the same effects can be obtained even when the width W is set so as to satisfy Formula (3) will be described with reference to the result of experiment. As shown in Figure 2A , when the incident light L 0 (a plane wave) is limited by an opening a of the aperture A , the incident light L transmitted through the opening a of the aperture A is diffracted by the opening a to become nearly a spherical wave. This effect becomes larger as the width W of the opening a is smaller. Namely, as in the present example (Figure 1 ), in the case where the incident light L 0 is limited by the aperture A , the incident light L with respect to the polarization diffraction element 10 (i.e., outgoing light from the aperture A ) becomes a spherical wave. Because of this, as shown in Figure 2B , both of the incident light L and diffracted reflected light L 2 become a spherical wave. As a result, in an interference portion L i of the incident light L and the diffracted reflected light L 2 , a stripe pattern is formed as shown in Figure 2C . This stripe pattern is generated by the interference between the spherical waves. As the incident light L and the diffracted reflected light L 2 become close to a spherical wave, the number of stripes in the stripe pattern observed in the interference portion L i increases. Namely, as the width W of the opening a of the aperture A becomes smaller, the number of the stripes in the interference portion L i increases. In the case where the number of the stripes is small, the intensity of light in the interference portion L i is greatly fluctuated, when the wavelength of the incident light L is fluctuated. In contrast, in the case where the number of the stripes is larger, even though the wavelength of the incident light L i is fluctuated, the position of the stripes are merely fluctuated and the fluctuation of the intensity of light in the interference light L i is decreased. As a result, the noise amount obtained by the photodetector (not shown) becomes smaller, compared with the case where the incident light L is a plane wave. The result of experiment showing the above-mentioned phenomenon will be described by illustrating exemplary values. Figure 3 shows the relationship between the noise level and the width W of the aperture A . This result is obtained by measuring the noise level of a signal from the photodetector, in the case where the width of the incident light L is changed to the range of 1.5 mm to 3 mm by varying the width W of the aperture A having the opening a with a circular shape. In this experiment, the polarization diffraction element 10 is used, in which the wavelength of an incident light λ = 780 nm, the thickness of the substrate 11 = 1 mm, a refractive index n = 1.454, an incident angle  1 with respect to the polarization diffraction element 10 = 58°, and a diffraction angle  2 in the substrate 11 by the first diffraction grating 12  2 = 35.68°. A noise level N refers to a noise level obtained by regulating an oscillation wavelength so as to be constant without applying a high frequency driving current to a laser which oscillates the incident light. Under the above-mentioned conditions, a width W 0 of the aperture A which nullifies the noise of a signal caused by the interference in the polarization diffraction element can theoretically be obtained by Formula (2) as follows: W 0 = 2 · 1 · tan35.68° · sin(90° - 58°) = 0.761 mm Thus, as represented by the broken line in Figure 3 , it is expected that a curve is formed, in which the noise level is N when the width W of the aperture A is 0.76 mm. However, as shown by the solid line in Figure 3 , in an actual measurement, a noise is hardly caused by the interference, when the width W of the aperture A is about 1.5 mm. Namely, it is understood that a noise level is sufficiently decreased, when the width W of the aperture A is about twice the width W 0 at which a signal noise is theoretically nullified. Considering the above-mentioned experimental result, as shown in Figures 4A and 4B , a light L 0 is converted into a spherical wave light by a lens 40 , which is the incident light L with respect to the polarization diffraction element 10 , whereby a signal having a sufficiently decreased noise component can be detected without limiting the incident region of the incident light L . It is also possible that the incident light L is made into a spherical wave and the incident region is limited. According to the structure shown in Figure 4B , it is not required to provide the converging lens 120 for converging light on the photodetectors 130a and 130b as shown in Figure 11 . As shown in Figures 5A through 5C , in the present example, the shape of the opening a of the aperture A can be a slit, an oval, a circle, etc. Any shape can be used as long as the opening a with the width W is present in the vertical direction of the figures. The slit-shaped opening a shown in Figure 5A is easily produced; however, the shape of converted beam spots in the photodetector is not satisfactory. In order to form the most satisfactory shape of the converted beam spot, it is desired that the cross-section of the incident light L is made circular as shown in Figure 5C . Example 2 Figure 6 is a plan view schematically showing a polarization detector of a second example. In the polarization detector, a light-intercepting seal S is attached to the light incident side of the first diffraction grating 12 of the polarization diffraction element 10 having the same structure as that of the polarization diffraction element 110 shown in Figure 9 . The light-intercepting seal S is provided for the purpose of limiting the incident region of the incident light L . The light-intercepting seal S is provided with an opening with a width m in the orthogonal direction with respect to the groove direction of the first diffraction grating 12 . Light is incident upon the polarization diffraction element 10 only through this opening. The width m is determined by calculation as follows: In order to prevent the interference of light in the polarization diffraction element 10 , the width m can be set so as to satisfy the following Formula (4) in the same way as in Example 1. m < 2t 0 · tan 2 In the polarization detector having the above-mentioned structure, the same effects as those in Example 1 can be obtained. In the case where the polarization detector is realized using a structure in which a lens is provided on the light incident side of the polarization diffraction element 10 as shown in Figures 4A and 4B , since the incident light L with respect to the polarization diffraction element 10 is nearly a spherical wave, the interference of light can be prevented even though the width m is about twice the maximum value obtained by Formula (4). Namely, the width m can be set so as to satisfy the following Formula (5). m < 4t 0 · tan 2 The shape of the opening of the light-intercepting seal S can be a slit, an oval, a circle, etc. Any shapes can be used as long as the width m of the opening is present in the orthogonal direction with respect to the groove direction of the first diffraction gating 12 as shown in Figure 6 . Moreover, the material for the light-intercepting member is not limited to a seal. For example, even though a coating for preventing light transmission is provided on the light incident surface of the polarization diffraction element 10 , the same effects as those of the light-intercepting seal S can be obtained. Alternatively, as shown in Figure 7 , the following is also possible: the first diffraction grating 12 is formed so as to be smaller than the range of the substrate 10 to which the incident light L reaches, i.e., the first diffraction grating 12 is formed so as to have the above-mentioned width m , thereby preventing the diffracted reflected light L 2 from reaching the inside of the first diffraction grating 12 . In this case, when the incident light is nearly a spherical wave, the width m is determined by Formula (5). Example 3 In a polarization detector of the third example, the interference of light in the polarization diffraction grating 10 is prevented by modifying the design of the polarization diffraction element 10 shown in Figure 1 or 6 , instead of limiting the incident light by using the light-intercepting seal S or the aperture A as described in the above-mentioned examples. A method for designing the polarization diffraction element 10 will be described. Assuming that the width of an incident light (which is incident upon the first diffraction grating 12 of the polarization diffraction element 10 ) in the vertical direction of Figure 1 or 6 is W 0 , a thickness t of the substrate 11 forming the polarization diffraction element 10 should satisfy the following Formula (6): t > W 0 /(2tan 2 · sin 1 ) When the incident light is nearly a spherical wave, the thickness t which satisfies the following Formula (7) can be used in the same way as in the other examples. t > W 0 /(4tan 2 · sin 1 ) In the present example, the same effects as those of the other examples can be obtained without limiting the incident region of light with respect to the polarization diffraction grating 10 . As described above, in the polarization detector of the present invention, the interference between the incident light and the diffracted reflected light of the incident light can be prevented or the influence of the light interference can be eliminated. Thus, the intensity of light is not fluctuated on the photodetector along with the fluctuation of the wavelength of a laser beam, and a satisfactory data signal with less noise component can be detected. Various other modifications will be apparent to and can be readily made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope.

Claims: A polarization detector for separating the P and S components of an incident light beam (L;L 0 ), the detector including a polarization diffraction element (10) comprising a transparent substrate (11) having first and second diffraction gratings (12,13) on respective first and second opposite parallel surfaces thereof, the first and second diffraction gratings (12,13) being formed so that P component light transmitted through the first and second gratings and S component light diffracted by the first and second gratings can be separately detected after emerging from said second grating (13), characterised in that either the incident light beam (L-Fig.1;L 0 -Fig.6) or the first diffraction grating (12-Fig.7) is limited in its extent, as measured in a direction perpendicular to the grating lines at said first surface of the substrate (11), so as to inhibit interference between S component light (L 2 ) reflected within the substrate (11) from said second surface and the incident beam (L;L 0 ). A polarization detector according to claim 1, including limiting means (A;S) for limiting an incident region of the incident light beam on the polarization diffraction element in said measuring direction. A polarization detector according to claim 2, wherein the limiting means is formed of a light-intercepting member (A;S), which limits said incident region on a surface of the polarization diffraction element on which the first diffraction grating (12) is formed. A polarization detector according to claim 3, wherein the light-intercepting member is formed of a light intercepting film (S) formed on the first diffraction grating. A polarization detector according to any of claims 2 to 4, wherein said limited extent is 4t 0 · tan  2 or less, where t 0 is a thickness of the transparent substrate (11) of the polarization diffraction element and  2 is a diffraction angle of the incident light beam (L 0 ) in the substrate by the first diffraction grating. A polarization detector according to claim 3, wherein the light intercepting member is formed of an aperture (A) which limits the width of the incident light beam to a limit width thereof measured in a plane orthogonal to the axis of said light beam. A polarization detector according to claim 6, wherein the limit width is 4t 0 · tan 2 · sin(90° -  1 ) or less, where to is a thickness of the transparent substrate (11) of the polarization diffraction element (10),  1 is an incident angle of the incident light beam (L) on the polarization diffraction element, and  2 is a diffraction angle of the incident light in the substrate by the first diffraction grating. A polarization detector according to any preceding claim, wherein a conversion means (a;40) is further provided on a light incident side of the first diffraction grating (12), the conversion means being arranged to convert the incident light beam to a spherical wave and to cause the spherical wave to be incident upon the polarization diffraction element. A polarization detector according to claim 8 wherein the conversion means is selected from the group consisting of a lens (40) and an aperture (A). A polarization detector according to any preceding claim, wherein there is provided: converging means (120;40) for respectively converging light transmitted through the first diffraction grating and the second diffraction grating and light diffracted by the first diffraction grating and the second diffraction grating into different beam spots; and a pair of photodetecting means (130a,130b) for detecting the respective optical intensities of the two beam spots converged by the converging means. A polarization detector according to claim 10, wherein the converging means (40) is provided on the light incident side of the polarization diffraction element. A polarization detector according to claim 10, wherein the converging means (120) is provided on a light outgoing side of the polarization diffraction element. A polarization detector according to claim 1, wherein the first diffraction grating (12) is limited in its extent in said measure direction to a maximum width of 4t 0 · tan 2 , where t 0 is a thickness of the substrate and  2 is a diffraction angle of the incident light beam (L 0 ) in the substrate by the first diffraction grating (12); and wherein there is further provided: converging means (40;120) for respectively converging light transmitted through the first diffraction grating and the second diffraction grating and light diffracted by the first diffraction grating and the second diffraction grating into different beam spots; and a pair of photodetecting means (130a, 130b) for detecting the respective optical intensities of the two beam spots converged by the converging means. A polarization detector according to claim 1, wherein when said limited extent of the incident light beam in said measure direction corresponds to a width (W 0 ) of the incident light beam measured in a plane orthogonal to the axis of said light beam, a thickness of the transparent substrate is W 0 /{4tan 2 · sin(90° -  1 )} or more, where  1 is an incident angle of the incident light, and  2 is a diffraction angle of the incident light in the substrate by the first diffraction grating.

Inventors: KURATA YUKIO, MIYAKE TAKAHIRO, NAKATA YASUO, YOSHIDA YOSHIO, KURATA, YUKIO, MIYAKE, TAKAHIRO, NAKATA, YASUO, YOSHIDA, YOSHIO
Applicants: SHARP KK, SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Application year: 1993
Main classification: G02B5
IPC codes: G02B5, G02B27, G11B11, G01J4