Protein concentrates

Abstract: A process of treating an isoelectrically prepared vegetable protein concentrate having a protein content of below 70% by weight (eg. from 65% to below 70%) to enhance its functionality for binding fat and water into a stable emulsion comprises the steps, in the absence of substantial shearing forces, of (a) holding an aqueous slurry of the concentrate at an alkaline pH, and a treatment temperature of 75°C-95°C for 1-120 minutes eg. 1-60 min; (b) neutralizing the treated slurry eg. to a pH of 6.8 to 7.0; and optionally (c) evaporating the neutralized slurry and drying it by for example spray drying. The protein may be derived from soya, wheat gluten, lupin, pea, sunflower or rape. The solubility of the protein may be decreased by the treatment. The protein concentrate may form the basis of an emulsion comprising 1 part by weight (dry basis) of the concentrate and at least 5 parts by weight water and at least 5 parts by weight fat.

Description: Vegetable protein concentrates or isolates derived for example from soya are widely used in the food industry, for example in the manufacture of comminuted meat products such as sausages. Non-functional protein concentrates are generally used simply as a protein enrichment ingredient but isolates and functional concentrates have the important functional ability to bind fat and water into stable emulsions and to form a firm stable gel upon cooking. Protein concentrates generally have a protein content of e.g. from 65% to below 70% by weight, typically for example about 65%, whereas protein isolates have a protein content for example in excess of 90%. The functionality of protein isolates for the formation of stable emulsions and a firm gel on cooking has generally been significantly superior to that of protein concentrates, but the isolates are more expensive than the concentrates. Possible alternatives to soya as the raw material for vegetable protein isolates and concentrates include lupin, pea, wheat gluten, sunflower and rape. although sunflower and rape may be less acceptable owing to phenolic taints derived from their seed coats unless the polyphenolic constituents are extracted. One known process for the manufacture of a low functionality protein concentrate involves washing defatted soya grits with aqueous alcohol in order to remove low molecular weight carbohydrate oligomers and so concentrate the protein fraction of the soya. The protein is rendered insoluble by the alcohol and retained in a slurry. The slurry is evaporated and dried e.g. by spray drying or alternatively counter-current alcohol extraction is employed. The proteins in the concentrate are considered to be denatured by the alcohol and may have been damaged by the defatting process if heat has been used. Their role in foods is generally as a protein enrichment ingredient without significant fat binding or gelling properties. In another known process which produces protein concentrates of higher functionality, the proteins are rendered insoluble by acid washing at their isoelectric point, (e.g. pH 4.2), with unwanted carbohydrates being washed away. The less acidic, whey fraction, containing enzyme active proteins is also removed at this stage as a relatively small proportion of the total protein. In this process denaturation by alcohol is avoided and careful defatting to yield defatted grits of high protein dispersibility index (PDI) e.g. in excess of 65 (e.g. in the range 65-80) can minimise damage in the starting material. Protein dispersibility index is defined for example in "Soybeans: Chemistry and Technology" Volume 1 "Proteins" by A.K. Smith and S.J. Circle, The Avi Publishing Company, Inc., U.S.A. 1972. In this process the native undenatured structure or "vitality" can be retained unlike alcohol-washed concentrates. The washed slurry may be evaporated and dried as in the alcohol washing process. Concentrates produced by both these processes contain residual, high molecular weight, insoluble carhohydrates of arabinogalactan composition, concentrated by the process to about 25% by weight. The highly functional and more expensive protein isolates may be produced for example again by acid washing at the isoelectric point, but followed by disolving the washed slurry in alkali, separating the solid residue containing insoluble carbohydrates from the solution and re-precipitating the protein at e.g. pH 7.0. In EP 13093-A of A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company, a process is described in which the functionality of a protein is improved by treatment at an elevated temperature and a pH from 6.5 to 9. High shear and pressure are also required in the process which relies on increasing the water solubility of the protein. The resulting concentrates have functionality slightly better than conventional isoelectrically prepared concentrates but well below that achieved by protein isolates. It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for producing a protein concentrate of improved functionality. The invention provides a process as described in claim 1. Usually the aqueous slurry will be taken directly from the isoelectric preparation procedure omitting the drying step of that procedure. The aqueous slurry to be treated for example has a solids content of 12-25% by weight e.g. 12-17%; the alkaline pH of the treatment is for example 7.5-9.0 or 9.5, e.g. 7.5-8.5. The treatment temperature is 80°C-95°C, e.g. about 85°C and for example is maintained for about 30 minutes. Typically the alkaline conditions are maintained by sodium hydroxide addition but other alkalis such as potassium, calcium or ammonium hydroxides could be used. Neutralisation is for example effected by the addition of hydrochloric acid. The invention also provides an isoelectrically prepared protein concentrate of enhanced functionality obtainable by a process according to the invention. We believe that when isoelectrically prepared concentrates are treated by a process embodying the invention the performance exceeds that of all known concentrates and approaches, or may even exceed, that of isolates. The functionality increases in spite of a decrease in the solubility of the soya protein and is achieved by modifying the concentrate to give a higher water absorption without the loss of existing high fat absorption. It will be noted that the decrease in solubility is in contrast to EP 13093 where the solubility increases. In our view it is not particularly surprising that heat and alkaline conditions would improve the relatively low functionality of a concentrate such as PROCON 2000 as referred to in EP 13093, where in any event the proteins have almost certainly been denatured by alcohol washing. On the other hand it is indeed surprising that heat and alkali treatment improves the functionality of an isoelectrically prepared concentrate where the expectation would have been that such harsh treatment might well adversely affect the retained native protein structure. Examples of products in which protein concentrates embodying the invention may be used include sausages, burgers and grillsteaks, canned meat, meat pies, fish and meat spreads and pastes; quiches and flans, textured vegetable protein, vegetarian grillsteaks, vegetarian pates and spreads; frozen, chilled canned, packet and ambient deserts; savoury and sweet spreads, pates, cheese spreads, vegetable and meat extracts, sandwich spreads; childrens and babies' foods; low calorie dressings, low fat cream alternatives, low fat spreads, low fat cheeses; ice cream, yoghurt and dairy spreads, yellow fats and ready-made flavoured drinks. Typically the food industry requires emulsions of weight ratio 1:5:5 (soya protein:water:fat), particularly in stabilising food systems that use high fat and water mixtures such as for example sausages, other comminuted meat products, and dairy product replacers. This can be achieved by using protein isolates but not generally by using protein concentrates. It was believed that soya protein concentrates could not match the maximum fat:water emulsifying properties of soya protein isolates. A process embodying the invention enables stable emulsions to be prepared at the required 1:5:5 (protein:water:fat) ratio and even as high as 1:10:20 or 1:15:30 (protein:water:fat). The invention also provides a protein concentrate according to the invention capable of forming an emulsion comprising 1 part by weight (dry basis) of the protein concentrate; 5-15 (e.g. 5-10) parts by weight water; and 5-30 (e.g. 5-20) parts by weight fat. The invention also provides an emulsion comprising 1 part by weight (dry basis) of a protein concentrate according to the invention, at least 5 parts by weight water, and at least 5 parts by weight fat. A protein concentrate according to the invention has for example a protein content of at least 65%, a fat absorption of at least 200% and a water absorption at pH=7 of at least 300%. The temperatures involved in the process also reduce the microbiological count of the protein concentrate. We have found that important parameters in assessing protein functionality include, water absorption, paste viscosity as measured using a Rheometrics Fluid Spectrometer; and a bowl chopper emulsion test. Example I Starting Material NEWPRO - A soya protein concentrate prepared from defatted soya grits of PDI in the range 68-74 and marketed by Lucas Ingredients Limited of Bristol, England. The defatting is carried out by solvent extraction using low heat during the removal of the extraction solvent. NEWPRO has the following characteristics:- Protein Content (dry basis) 65% by weight Protein Solubility 74g/l Fat Absorption 212% Water Absorption 170% at pH = 7.0 These characteristics were determined as follows:- Protein Assay Protein was determined by Kjeldahl using a factor of 6.25. Solubility of Protein The true solubility of protein was determined by extracting 1g sample in 10 ml water at ambient temperature with stirring. The solution was recovered by centrifugation and filtration for spectrophotometric analysis. The absorbance at 280 nm was determined in a 1cm path cuvette and related to the protein concentration by the approximate formula Protein Concentration (mg/ml) = A 280 Fat Absorption Protein concentrate 3.34g was weighed into a graduated centrifuge tube and 20ml corn oil added. The contents were mixed and held at ambient temperature for 30min. The free oil was separated by centrifugation at 3200rpm for 25min and measured volumetrically. Fat absorption was expressed as the quantity of oil bound by 100g of sample, on a 14% moisture basis, and is subject to an error of around ± 10%. This test will provide a relative grading for a protein preparation that relates to, rather than reproduces, the exact numerical value found in full formulation testing. Water Absorption Protein concentrate 2g, was dispersed in 12ml of water in a pre-weighed centrifuge tube. The suspension was centrifuged at 13,000g for 20min and the supernatant water decanted off and the tubes allowed to drain inverted. The tubes containing hydrated protein were re-weighed and the weight of absorbed water calculated. Treatment A 17% solids by weight aqueous slurry of NEWPRO was adjusted to pH 9.0 by the addition of 40% sodium hydroxide with stirring. The slurry was held at a temperature of 85°C for 30 minutes, and then neutralized to about pH 7.0 with dilute hydrochloric acid and allowed to cool. The treated material had the following characteristics determined as before: Protein Content (dry basis) 65% by weight Protein Solubility 34g/l Fat Absorption 209% Water Absorption 382% at pH=7 Paste Viscosity Test The paste viscosity of the treated slurry was measured at 17% solids using a Rheometrics Fluids Spectrometer RFS 8400 as marketed by Rheometrics Inc. of New Jersey, U.S.A. The test was performed using a 15mm diametric parallel plate at 25rad/s shear over 8min at 20°C. The value obtained has units Pas. This paste viscosity is related to water binding ability. The treated slurry had a paste viscosity of 258 Pas as measured by this test as compared with only 38 Pas for a control slurry of 17% NEWPRO simply hydrated at ambient temperature for 20 minutes without any pH adjustment. Example II The procedure of Example I was repeated at 10% solids and 25% solids by weight In the case of 10% solids the treated slurry had a paste viscosity of 0.45 Pas as compared with 0.24 Pas for a 10% control slurry. In the case of 25% solids the treated slurry had a paste viscosity of 1128 Pas as compared with 392 for a 25% control slurry. Example III 156kg of a 17% solids by weight NEWPRO slurry was heated in a steam heated stirred vessel. The pH was adjusted to pH 8.5 with NaOH solution. Heat transfer to the slurry was slow and temperatures were recorded as in Table 1. The maximum temperature attained was 78°C after 55 min. The pH was monitored during the treatment and recorded in Table 1. Temperature and pH profiles for heated slurry Time (min) Temperature (°C) pH 0 Ambient 8.5 30 60 7.9 35 64 45 72 55 78 7.5 65 77 75 7.4 It will be realized from Table 1 that the slurry was held at a temperature in excess of 75°C at a pH above 7.5 for about 10-20 minutes. It was noted that the consistency of the slurry changed during the treatment. On treatment with alkali the slurry became glossy textured, yellowish and sticky. As the heating proceeded, the slurry thinned in the 30 min period up to 60°C but became noticeably thicker at 78°C after 55 min. The final product was gel-like and firm and capable of forming stable emulsions with water and fat of up to 1:15:30 (protein:water:fat). The effect of shear close to the stirrer was to thin the slurry somewhat. Example IV A 17% solids by weight NEWPRO slurry of pH 6.8 was adjusted to pH 9.0 using sodium hydroxide and pumped into a scraped surface heat exchanger. The throughput of slurry was 1000kg/hr at a temperature of 85°C-95°C; the residence time in the heat exchanger was 1.2 minutes. After passage through the heat exchanger, the slurry was adjusted in line to pH 6.8 using hydrochloric add and diluted to 12% solids by weight. The product was spray dried on a Niro F35 spray drier with inlet temperature of 180°C and collected. Bowl Chopper Test 500 grams of the spray dried product was mixed with 2.5kg of water at low speed for 2 minutes using an Alexanderwerk 2 speed bowl chopper of nominal capacity 18kg. 2.5kg of ground nut oil was added at high speed for 3 minutes and the emulsion allowed to develop for a further 3 minutes on high speed. The hood was cleared down at 2 and 5 minutes. The material from the chopper provided a stable emulsion which remained stable on cooking. Example V Various sausages were prepared using a bowl chopper as follows: Pork Sausages Pork and Beef Sausages Overall Composition by Weight Overall Composition by Weight Protein 2% Protein 3% Water 22% Water 33% 80/20 Lean Pork 40% 80/20 Lean Pork 30% Back Fat 20% Beef Fat 7% Pork Rinds 6% Back Fat 10% Seasoning 2.5% Pork Rinds 4% Rusk 6% Seasoning 2.5% Farina 1.5% Rusk 9% Farina 1.5% 100% 100% The protein was hydrated with slightly more than half the water with the addition of the farina and seasoning; these components were mixed for 30 seconds on slow speed. The mixer speed was then increased to fast, the lean meat and rinds added, the mixture chopped for 60 seconds, the hood deared down and the mixture part-chopped for a further 30 seconds. The fats were then added with chopping on fast speed for 30 seconds, dearing down of the hood and chopping for a further 30 seconds. The rusk was then chopped in at slow speed together with the remaining water for 30 seconds, the hood cleared down and chopping for 30 seconds on fast speed. The protein was prepared as in Example I. Control sausages were also prepared using untreated NEWPRO as the protein concentrate in one case and 500E isolate in another. 500E isolate is a functional protein isolate of 90% by weight protein marketed by Protein Technologies International, U.S.A. Some sausages were then shallow fried for 20 minutes and others were deep fried for 7 minutes. The results are shown in Table 3 Shallow Fry - 20 minutes NO SPLITS SLIGHT SPLITS FULL SPLITS TEXTURE TOTAL LOSS PORK SAUSAGE Untreated NEWPRO - 85% 15% SOFT 5.6% 500E 75% 25% - FIRM 5.6% Treated NEWPRO 90% 10% - FIRM 3.9% PORK & BEEf Untreated NEWPRO - 25% 75% SOFT 7.0% 500E 25% 75% - FIRM 8.4% Treated NEWPRO 40% 60% - FIRM 7.0% Deep Fry - 7 minutes "BUTTER FLY" SLIGHT SPLITS WHOLE SAUSAGES REMARKS PORK Untreated NEWPRO 20% 80% - UNSATISFACTORY 500E - 10% 90% SATISFACTORY Treated NEWPRO - 10% 90% SATISFACTORY PORK & BEEF Untreated NEWPRO 10% 30% 60% PROTRUDING ENDS 500E - - 100% SATISFACTORY Treated NEWPRO - - 100% SATISFACTORY "Butterfly" refers to longitudinal splitting of the sausages. Example VI A rind emulsion was prepared using a bowl chopper as follows: Pork Rinds 5 parts by weight Water 5 parts by weight Protein 1 part by weight (dry basis). The preparation procedure was generally as in Example V but all the water was added prior to mixing. The protein used was as in Example I and these emulsions were deep fried as in Example V. The untreated NEWPRO emulsion proved unstable on cooking while 500E and the treated NEWPRO were stable and of comparable stability. While not wishing to be bound by theory it is believed that untreated NEWPRO has a high proportion of soluble hydrophobic protein which will bind fat but not water. Protein isolates are similarly characterised but isolates also contain an insoluble protein which is effective for binding water. The basic water binding ability of NEWPRO is thought to derive from its insoluble polysaccharide content. We believe that by the heat and alkali treatment we promote the formation of disulphide linkages in the hydrophobic protein which causes it to aggregate thereby becoming less soluble but retaining its hydrophobic and fat absorbing properties. The reduced solubility of the protein (albeit still hydrophobic) confers it with a water binding macro-structure.

Claims: A process of treating a vegetable protein concentrate isoelectrically prepared from a defatted proteinaceous material having a protein dispersibility index (PDI) in excess of 65 and having a protein content of below 70% by weight (e.g. from 65% to below 70%) to enhance its functionality for binding fat and water into a stable emulsion, comprising the steps in the absence of substantial shearing forces of (a) holding an aqueous slurry of the concentrate at an alkaline pH, and a treatment temperature of 80°C-95°C for 1-120 minutes e.g. 1-60 min; (b) neutralizing the treated slurry e.g. to a pH of 6.8 to 7.0; and optionally (c) evaporating the neutralized slurry and drying it by for example spray drying, wherein the solubility of the protein is decreased by the treatment. A process according to claim 1 wherein the aqueous slurry to be treated has a solids content of 12-25% by weight, e.g. 12-17% by weight. A process according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein said alkaline pH is 7.5-9.0 or 9.5, e.g. 7.5-8.5. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the treatment temperature is about 85°C. A process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the protein is derived from soya, wheat gluten, lupin, pea, sunflower or tape. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the protein concentrate has a PDI in the range of 65-80. An isoelectrically prepared protein concentrate of enhanced functionality obtainable by a process according to any one of the preceding claims and e.g. having a protein content of at least 65% by weight, a fat absorption of at least 200% and a water absorption at pH=7 of at least 300%. A protein concentrate according to claim 7, capable of forming an emulsion comprising 1 part by weight(dry basis) of the protein concentrate; 5-15 (e.g. 5-10) parts by weight water and 5-30 (e.g. 5-20) parts by weight fat. An emulsion comprising 1 part by weight (dry basis) of a protein concentrate according to claim 7, at least 5 parts by weight water and at least 5 parts by weight fat.

Inventors: CANDY MICHAEL JOHN, FITCHETT COLIN STANLEY, FRAZIER PETER JOHN, CANDY, MICHAEL JOHN, FITCHETT, COLIN STANLEY, FRAZIER, PETER JOHN
Applicants: DALGETY PLC
Application year: 1992
Main classification: A23J3
IPC codes: A23J3, A23L1