POLYURETHANE-CONTAINING SEALANT AND COATING

Abstract: By way of summary, the present invention relates to waterborne coating compositions, methods of preparing such compositions, and methods of applying such compositions. More particularly, but without limitation, two compositions of the present invention comprise water-containing dispersions, suspensions or emulsions employing either (a) about 10 % to about 90 %, by weight of the final compositions, of a select urethane-urea dispersion; having incorporated therein either (b) about 10 % to about 90 %, by weight of the final composition, of a bituminous material, such as asphalt or (c) about 10 % to about 90 %, by weight of the final composition, of a (vinylic) latex material. An additional water-containing dispersion, suspension or emulsion is disclosed without limitation, as employing (a) about 5 % to about 10 % by weight of the final composition of a urethane-urea dispersion; (b) about 5 % to about 30 % by weight of the final composition of a (vinylic) latex material; and (c) about 10 % to about 90 %, by weight of the final composition, of a bituminous material, preferably asphalt.

Description: POLYURETHANE-CONTAINING SEALANT AND COATING This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Serial Number 684,231, filed April 12, 1991 and which is expressly incorporated herein by reference. This application is related to compositions and methods providing improved sealing and coating properties. Such compositions and methods are particularly useful in sealing and/or coating aging, chalky, rough or powdery surfaces which are typically difficult to seal or coat and maintain good adhesion, such as roofs or driveways. They are also particularly useful in coating flexible surfaces (or surfaces undergo thermal expansion/contraction) and require the associated coating to flex without significant loss of its sealing properties. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The compositions and methods of the present invention relate to waterborne sealing or coating compositions which employ urethane-urea dispersions. They also relate to compositions which include urethane-urea dispersions ("UUD") and which also employ asphalt, natural and/or synthetic latex, or mixtures of all three, and may additionally employ other select additives or components. These other additives or components include other polymers or polymer-like material (e.g., in addition to latices and asphalt emulsions); pigments; fillers; biocides; antioxidants; and the like. Similar compositions and methods are known in the art; however, none of the art-disclosed compositions or methods provide the same combination of unique properties and advantages as the compositions and methods of the present invention. For example, Warach, in "Polyurethane Dispersions - Waterbased High Performance Adhesive Material," Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 61, Fall, 1989, published by the American Chemical Society, discusses the manufacture of polyurethane dispersions, including those blended with vinylacetate/ethylene; vinylacetate; acrylic; and natural rubber (latex); as an adhesive. No mention is made of the inclusion of asphalt, or the importance of particle size when employing UUD as a sealant coating. U.S. 3,967,012, issued June 26, 1976 to Ebner, discloses a process for applying a coating to a surface by employing an aqueous suspension or dispersion selected from the group which consists of bitumens, asphalts, and tars; and moisture-resistant natural or synthetic rubbers or synthetic resin particles. The patentee further indicates that the primary coating substances may include one or more of the mentioned classes of compound such as a polymethyl methacrylate latex in which particles of polystyrene or a prepolymer of the urethane type are dispersed together with bitumen particles and/or a natural or synthetic (ABS-type) rubber. However, such compositions must be heated after being applied to the surface to effect coagulation to form a coherent layer (while at the same time avoiding "material evaporation of water therefrom"); and lastly then heated to dry the coagulated composition. U.S. Patent No. 4,160,065, (expressly incorporated herein by reference) issued July 3, 1979 to Leowrigkeit et al. The patentee discloses specific latex materials and, more specifically, water-dispersible polyurethane products from stable latices of select chain-extended quaternized polyurethane ureas. In summary, a specific latex is made from a quaternized isocyanate terminated prepolymer. These materials are disclosed as being useful as adhesives and "skin-coat" films and do not require heat for "drying." U. S. Patent Nos. 3,873,484 issued to Bluestein et al. on March 25, 1975; and 3,758,427 issued to Katsibas on September 11, 1973; are directed to additional water- dispersible polyurethanes. Both of these patents are expressly incorporated herein by reference. U. S. Patent No. 4,186,118, issued to Reischl et al. on January 29, 1980, discloses a process for preparing modified aqueous synthetic resin dispersions which includes introducing organic diisocyanates (which are liquid at room temperature) into polyurethane-containing, non-sedimenting, aqueous synthetic resin dispersions. The resulting aqueous dispersions so modified are described as containing latex particles which are enveloped with polyurea formed from the diisocyanates. The resulting compositions are described as being useful as water-resistant surface coatings. This reference suggests that aqueous dispersions of non-polyurethane polymerization products may be mixed with the polyurethane dispersion before the process described by the patentee is carried out. Polymer latices can be made from, among other materials: natural or synthetic rubber; butadiene-methacrylate copolymers; polyacrylic acid esters; PVC; and others. See, without limitation, Col. 2, lines 34-44. U. S. Patent No. 3,988,278 issued to D. C. Bartizal on October 26, 1976 discloses self-emulsified polyurethane polyurethane-polyurea latices formed by chain extending (in water) a prepolymer which contains about two isocyanates group (per molecule) at the ends of a chain. Attached to some of these prepolymer chains is a pendant group; at the end of the pendant group is either a "salt-forming" group or a hydrophilic group. It is the patentee's contention that it is the inclusion of these latter groups which produces the resulting self-emulsified characteristics. U. S. Patent No. 3,796,678, issued to D.C. Bartizal on March 12, 1974, discloses modified polyurethanes for pressure-sensitive adhesives. U. S. Patent No. 3,962,167, issued to R. Martorano et al. on June 8, 1976, discloses aqueous coating compositions which are primarily thermosetting compositions. U. S. Patent No. 4,002,004, issued to D. C. Cavin on January 11, 1977, discloses cationic emulsion which contains asphalt. See also (for anionic urethane-urea materials) U.S. 3,759,873; 3,882,189; 3,945,899; 4,046,729; 4,163,094; and 4,554,308; for nonionic urethane-urea materials see U.S.4,403,083; 4,501,852; and 4,472,550. U.S.4,046,729 is particularly useful for guidance in preparing useful anionic materials. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to novel waterborne coating and/or sealing compositions, methods of preparing such compositions, and methods of applying waterborne coating compositions. More particularly, but without limitation, exemplary coating or sealing compositions of the present invention comprise dispersions or suspensions preferably employing: (a) a select urethane-urea dispersion at a level of up to about 90% by weight of solids of the final compositions (wherein said UUD is preferably a chain-extended anionic, cationic and nonionic polyurethane-urea dispersion and is optionally a UUD modified latex) wherein the UUD preferably has an average particle size of less than about 0.1 microns, more preferably less than about 0.65 and still more preferably about 0.02 to about 0.06 microns; and (b) up to about 90%, by weight of solids of the final composition, of a bituminous material, preferably as asphalt added as an asphalt emulsion or natural latex. The final material, when applied, preferably cures at ambient temperatures and without applying heat. Other exemplary preferred compositions of the present invention also comprise (a) about 3% to about 40%, by weight of solids, of a urethane-urea dispersions having a select average particle size; (b) about 3% to about 30% of a natural or synthetic latex material; and (c) about 10% to about 94% of a bituminous material (preferably an asphalt emulsion) wherein said composition cures without application of heat. The resulting compositions are useful (without limitation) as roofing or driveway coating and sealing, coating and membrane- forming materials when allowed to air dry at ambient temperatures. The methods of the present invention also include the application of a composition comprising a blend of a urethane-urea dispersion (UUD) with a select average particle size. The methods further include the application of a natural or synthetic latex (e.g., an acrylic) modified by the inclusion of a UUD. The methods still further include the application of an asphalt modified by a UUD or UUD latex or UUDΛatex/asphalt composition to a roof or driveway, preferably with the addition of a pigment, filler, or the like. The methods of the present invention also relate to the preparation of these materials and the application of these compositions to a surface in need of coating or sealing. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Urethane-urea dispersions (UUD) based upon or which employ aromatic isocyanates, aliphatic isocyanates (including cyclic aliphatics), trimeric isocyanates, or mixtures there of, are useful in the compositions and methods of the present invention. Aliphatic-based materials, and more particularly cyclic aliphatic-based materials, are highly preferred. Such art-disclosed teachings of these compositions are included in Waterborne Polyurethanes, J. W. Rosthauser and K. Nachtkamp, published as part of a collection in Advances in Urethane Science and Technology, Kurt C. Frisch and D. Klempner; Technomic Publishing, Vol. 10; 1987 pp. 121-162, and incorporated herein by reference. Another useful discussion of the chemistry and application of aqueous polyurethane can be found in the Polyurethane Handbook, ed. G. Oertel, Hanser Publishers, Carl Hanswer Verlag, Munich, Germany, (1985). A wide variety of useful water-dispersible urethane-urea products are well known. Preferred materials include those described in Warrach and U.S. Patent Nos. 3,873,484; 3,750,427; 4,046,729; 4,403,083; 4,501,852; and 4,472,550, discussed above and expressly incorporated herein by reference. See also Examples A-l through A-6, herein, for preferred anionic materials. In a highly preferred embodiment, the anionic, cationic or nonionic urethane-urea is modified by the inclusion or addition of a latex. In general, these urethane-urea dispersions useful in the present invention are prepared by fully reacting urethane polymers in an aqueous system. They may be cationic, anionic or nonionic, depending upon the selection of the functional diol employed. In general, a polyol, a diisocyanate, a functional diol, a neutralizing agent (if necessary), a chain extender, and water are employed; the resulting products are fully reacted. While anionic, cationic and nonionic materials are useful, anionic materials are presently highly preferred. It should be noted that the following description will at times focus upon the production of cationic materials due to their suitability to serve as a model for the preparation of UUD components of the present invention. However, this is done merely for convenience; as noted above, the anionic materials (e.g., as depicted in the Examples A-l - A-6) are preferred. The skilled artisan will appreciate that this description may be varied to arrive at an anionic or nonionic UUD. In accordance with the preferred compositions and process of the present invention, the NCO-terminated anionic, cationic or nonionic prepolymer is dispersed in water to provide a dispersion of an NCO-terminated prepolymer. The polyurethane dispersion further reacts with an amine -reactive reagent to form the desired chain extended polymeric product having a higher molecular weight. Preferably, the amine- reactive reagent is added substantially together with the water. Liquid polymers based on butadiene and containing a controlled number of hydroxyl functional groups can be utilized for the preparation of the prepolymer used in the present invention. Preferably, a hydroxylated polybutadiene having a functionality of about 2.1 is used. The polyol or mixture of polyols utilized for the preparation of such a prepolymer for use in the present invention preferably has a hydroxyl number in the range of from about 10 to about 200, most preferably in the range of from about 20 to about 80 and optimally from about 30 to about 60, and is preferably a diol or a triol, most preferably an alkoxylated ether diol. The polyol can also comprise, alternatively, a hydroxyl or polyhydroxy- containing polyester. Such a compound preferably comprises a dihydroxy or a trihydroxy compound and, optimally, the dihydroxy polyester polyol is utilized. Polyether type polyols are most commonly derived from simple alkane diols, polymerized by reaction with an alkylene oxide, for example, to form the corresponding polyoxyalkylene polyether polyols. The preferred polyol monomers can be selected from among the glycols, such as neopentylglycol, ethyleneglycol, diethyleneglycol, hexamethyleneglycol, 1,4- and 1,3-butyleneglycols, 1,3- and 1,2-propyleneglycols, and the corresponding dipropyleneglycols. The most useful monomeric triols include the alkyl triols, such as trimethylolethane, trimethylolpropane, 1,2,4-butanetriol, 1,2,6-hexanetriol, glycerol, and triethanolamine. Aromatic polyols can also be used, such as trihydroxymethyl benzene. The alkylene oxides used in preparing the polyether polyols are preferably those which contain from two to about four carbon atoms, including, for example, ethylene oxide, 1,2-propylene oxide and 1,2-butylene oxide, and homopolymers and copolymers thereof. The polyhydric, polyalkylene ether can also be prepared from reagents such as glycidol and cyclic ethers, such as tetramethylene ethers, and the epihalohydrins, e.g., epichlorohydrin. The polyaralkylene ether polyols are derived from the corresponding aralkylene oxides, such as, for example, styrene oxide, alone or mixed with alkylene oxide. Generally, 1,2-propylene oxide, and mixtures of 1,2-propylene oxide and ethylene oxide, are preferred for the preparation of the polyether polyol reactant. The polyether polyols are useful in the present invention preferably at a molecular weight of from about 500 to about 8,000, most preferably from 1,000 to about 6,500, and optimally not greater than about 5,000, and are preferably characterized by a hydroxy functionality of at least about 1.5 up to about 8, and more preferably an average hydroxy functionality of from about 2 to about 5. Mixtures of all of the above may also be employed. Generally, the polyester polyol compounds useful for preparing the prepolymer in accordance with the present invention, can be prepared by, for example, the reaction of a polyhydric alcohol with a polycarboxylic acid, generally each containing from about two to twenty carbon atoms. The polycarboxylic acid can be not only the free carboxylic acid, but such acid precursors as the corresponding acid anhydrides or acid halides or even, for example, alkyl esters. The preferred acids are the dicarboxylic acids containing from about 4 to about 12 carbon atoms. Examples of the preferred carboxylic acid components include, for example, aromatic acids such as phthalic acid, terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, tetrachlorophthalic acid; cycloaliphatic acids, such as dimerized Iinoleic acid, maleated and fumarated rosin acids, and cyclohexane-l,4-diacetic acid; but preferably include the aliphatic acids, such as oxydipropionic, succinic, glutaric, adipic, azelaic, suberic, and sebacic acids, or mixtures of such acids. Lactones which can be used in place of the polyester polyols include those derived from gamma-butyrolactone, or epsilon-caprolactones. The glycols which can be utilized in the preparation of the prepolymer polyesters include any of those set forth above for the preparation of the polyether polyols. Generally, however, a dihydric polyol is preferred when preparing the polyester even more than when preparing the polyether polyol. The polyester polyol reactants preferably have a molecular weight of at least about 500 and optimally between about 2,000 and 6,000. Generally, the maximum molecular weight for both the polyether and the polyester polyols is limited primarily by the difficulty of mixing such materials with the other ingredients in the procedure. Thus, the higher molecular weight ingredients are useful, but because of the difficulty of working with them, they are not considered economical or practical and, therefore, are less preferred. An efficient mixing apparatus must be provided when dealing with such high molecular weight materials. Other useful polyols are those based upon various saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons such as poly b d R-445HT; R65M (both available from Sartomer, Inc.); LIR-503 (KL-5) available from Kuraray Co., Ltd.). They can be employed in any of the anionic, cationic or nonionic UUDs. Likewise, polyols modified by grafting styrene and an acrylonitrile, such as Pluracol 637; Pluracol 1002; or Pluracol 1028 (all available from BASF Corp.) can also be employed in the preparation of a UUD. The organic polyisocyanates useful in preparing the prepolymer compound in accordance with the present invention include those which contain at least two isocyanate groups per molecule, and may contain two or three isocyanate groups. The useful isocyanates include, aromatic, aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, and trimeric isocyanates. Most preferably a diisocyanate is utilized. Suitable organic polyisocyanates include, for example, n-butylene diisocyanate, methylene diisocyanate, m-xylylene diisocyanate, p- xylylene diisocyanate, cyclohexyl-l,4-diisocyanate, dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate, m-phenylene diisocyanate, p-phenylene diisocyanate, 3-(alphaisocyanatoethyl)-phenyl isocyanate, 2,6-diethylbenzene-l,4-diisocyanate, diphenyl-dimethylmethane-4,4'- diisocyanate, ethylidene diisocyanate, propylene-l,2-diisocyanate, cyclohexylene-1,2- diisocyanate, 2,4-tolylene diisocyanate, 2,6-tolylene diisocyanate, 3,3'-dimethyl-4,4'- biphenylene diisocyanate, 3,3'-dimethoxy-4,4'-biphenylene diisocyanate, 3,3'-diphenyl- 4,4'-biphenylene diisocyanate, 4,4'-biphenylene diisocyanate, 3,3'-dichloro-4,4'- biphenylenediisocyanate,l,5-naphthalenediisocyanate,diphenylmethanediisocyanate, l,6- hexamethylene diisocyanate and isophorone diisocyanate, etc. The aromatic, aliphatic diisocyanates and the cyclocaliphatic diisocyanates are preferred. The diisocyanates which have been found most useful in the preparation of the prepolymers are, specifically, cyclocaliphatic isocyanates, such as dicyclohexyl methane 4,4' diisocyanate (H 12 MDI), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), and aromatic isocyanates including toluene diisocyanate (TDI), and diphenyl methane diisocyanate. IPDI based UUD's tend to have different characteristics than H 1 MDI based UUD's. For example, IPDI-based materials appear to demonstrate improved elongation and adhesion with the H 12 MDI-ba_ed materials appear to demonstrate better tensile strength. When an anionic material is desired, the polyol and polyisocyanate are preferably reacted with an acid functional diol to form a pendant acid-containing NCO- terminated prepolymer. The preferred acid-containing diols may be of the formula (HO)-R(COOH) y or (HO)_R(SO 3 H) y where R represents a straight or branched chain hydrocarbon radical having from 1 to about 20 carbon atoms, and preferably about 2 to about 5 carbon atoms; x represents a value of from 1 to about 5, and preferably about 2 to 3; and y represents a value of from 1 to about 4, and preferably 1 to about 3. When such acid containing diols are employed, they may be neutralized (the pendent group) with organic or inorganic bases such as ammonium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, triethylamine, dimethylethylamine, and the like. When a nonionic material is desired, the polyol and polyisocyanate described above may be reacted as described above except that a hydrophilic group- containing diol or diisocyanate may be employed in place of the diols. Useful hydrophilic- group containing materials are preferably ethoxylated materials of the formula III or IV HO(CH 2 ) n - R - (CEy. - OH i (πi) (OCH,CH 2 ) m OR, or OCN - R j - NCO I (iv) (OCH 2 CH 2 ) m OR 2 wherein R represents a straight or branched chained hydrocarbon radical containing 1 to about 20 carbon atoms, and preferably about 2 to about 5 carbon atoms; n represents a value of from 1 to about 5, and preferably about 2 to about 3; m represents a value of about 1 to about 50, and preferably 2 to about 20, and even more preferably about 2 to about 10; R 2 represents a straight or branched hydrocarbon radical containing 1 to about 5 carbon atoms, preferably 1 to about 3; and R j represents either an aromatic or aliphatic hydrocarbon, e.g., H 12 MDI, IPDI, etc. The nonionic UUD can also be formed by reacting the prepolymer with diamines such as hydrazine and ethylene diamine, among others. For example: OCN-R 3 -NCO + H 2 NR 4 NH, - OCN-R 3 -NHCNHR 4 NHCNH-R,-NCO I II O O wherein R 3 is an aromatic or aliphatic hydrocarbon, preferably H 12 MDI or IPDI; and R 4 is (CH 2 ) X wherein x is O to about 4. Continued chain growth then proceeds. A neutralization step, typically required with the preparation of an anionic or cationic (quaternized) material, is not required with the preparation of a nonionic UUD. Generally, in carrying out the urethane prepolymer reactions, the only significant groups in the reactant compounds are the isocyanate groups and the hydroxyl groups which are reactive therewith. Any other group can be present in the reactants or in the final urethane polymer, so long as the group does not adversely interfere with, and is preferably inert to, the desired isocyanate/hydroxyl reaction as well as the optional neutralizing reaction and the subsequent chain-extending reactions between the prepolymer and the a ine -reactive reagent. Thus, acyclic, alicyclic, aromatic and heterocyclic groups can all be present on any of the reactive compounds as long as they do not adversely interfere. Similarly, inert substituent groups, such as certain halogens, can be present as long as they do not interfere with any of these reactions. When desired in the preparation of a cationic material, any suitable monofunctional quatemizing agent can be utilized in preparing a prepolymer. A di(loweralkyl) sulphate is preferred. The lower alkyl groups most preferably contain up to about 6 carbon atoms each and include, for example methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, etc. Dimethylsulphate is most preferred because of its ready availability and low cost. A catalyst is generally preferably present to increase the rate of reaction, especially between the polyisocyanate and the polyol. Catalysts which are useful for this reaction are well known in the art and include, for example, metal catalysts such as tin compounds and bismuth compounds, as well as other metal compounds, such as compounds of cobalt, lead, and, vanadium. Most preferred are the tin compounds, which include the stannous salts, e.g. stannous octoate, stannous acetate, and stannous oleate, the stannic salts, e.g. stannic diacetate, and stannic di-octoate, and also the covalently- linked, so-called organotin compounds, such as the dialkyltin dicarboxylate salts, including, for example, dibutylin diactate, and dibutylin dilaurate, and tributyltin oxide. The preparation of the prepolymer and the anionic, cationic or nonionic isocyanate terminated prepolymer, as described above, is conventional in the art, and the various materials useful for forming such a prepolymer are generally described in the literature, for example, in the text Advances in Polyurethane Science and Technology, Vol. 10, Roshauser and Nachcamp; published by Technomic Publishing, (1987); also see Warrach as well as U. S. Patent Nos. 3,873,484, 4,046,729, 4,160,065, 4,403,083, 4,501,852, and 4,472,550, all mentioned supra and incorporated herein by reference. The prepolymer is generally prepared in an anhydrous medium, and can include the presence of an inert diluent or solvent medium. The presence of solvent is optional, and can be avoided if the viscosity (if liquid) of the various reagents permits. Generally, not more than about 10% of an organic solvent is utilized, if any. Any suitable inert organic solvent can be utilized, and the term "inert" in this context refers to an ingredient which does not enter into, nor interfere with, the course of the prepolymerizing or quaternizating reactions. Useful such solvents include, preferably, n-methyl pyrrolidone, acetone and other water-soluble materials. Other useful solvents include, for example, tetrahydrofuran, dimethylformamide, ethylacetate, benzene, dioxane, and the like. The solvent most preferably has a boiling point in the range of from about 40° to about 90°C, in order to facilitate separation of the solvent from water. The proportions of the polyisocyanate reactant to the polyhydric alcohol reactant, including one or more polyols, can be varied to achieve desired results by varying the NCO/OH ratios in order to obtain different concentrations of soft and hard segments. In preparing the prepolymer, generally the total isocyanate (— NCO) equivalent-to-total hydroxy equivalent, should be such as to provide from about 1.6 to about 2.4 equivalents of the hydroxy to about 3 to about 7 equivalents of the isocyanate, the preferred ratio being approximately 1.4 hydroxy equivalents to 2.1 isocyanate equivalents. Preferably, the proportions of the major reagents in the cationic prepolymer reaction mixture would be as follows: (a) polyol about 0.8 to about 1.2 equivalents; (b) N-alkyl dialkanolamine about 0.8 to about 1.2 equivalents; (c) polyisocyanate about 3 to about 5 equivalents; and (d) dialkylsulfate about 0.4 to about 0.6 equivalents. The isocyanate terminated prepolymer, in accordance with the present invention, comprises a terminal isocyanate group (~NCO) group content within the range of from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight, and most preferably in the range from about 1.4% to about 3.5% by weight of the isocyanate group. As stated above, the prepolymer is generally prepared in anhydrous medium. The addition of a solvent, as explained above, is optional and depends upon the viscosity and state of the various reagents utilized and the apparatus which is available for carrying out the process. The reaction is generally carried out at a temperature above typical room temperatures, as the result of the reaction exotherm. However, the reaction can be carried out at a temperature of from about a typical room temperature (or even lower) up to the natural exotherm temperature of the reaction, which should generally be maintained at or below about 125°C, and preferably at no greater than about 85°C. Higher temperatures can be utilized but are not preferred because of possible concurrent side reactions at higher temperatures. The reaction is generally initiated by admixing the polymeric polyol, such as the polyether polyol or polyester polyol, with an acid functional diol or tertiary alkanolamine or hydrophilic group containing diol and the polyisocyanate. Following substantial completion of this reaction, and cooling to almost room temperature, the prepolymer is by the addition of the neutralizing agent, for example, the triethylamine. In a preferred embodiment for preparing the present prepolymer about one equivalent weight of a diol, such as a polyoxyalkylene glycol, is admixed with about one hydroxyl equivalent of an acid functional diol, or N-alkyl dialkanolamine, or hydrophilic group- containing diol and about four equivalents of an organic polyisocyanate, most preferably, a diisocyanate. The resultant reaction mixture is then neutralized (if desired) with about 0.5 equivalent of a neutralizing agent, such as triethylamine. The resulting anionic, nonionic or cationic (quaternized) prepolymer, as finally prepared, generally has an average molecular weight in the range of from about 500 to about 100.000; however, the molecular weight of the prepolymer is estimated and does not form a critical part of the present invention. It is prepared such that the typical or average particle size is in the range of from about less than 1 micron; more preferably less than about 0.8 microns; still more preferably less than about 0.65 microns, and still more less than about 0.4 microns. In one highly preferred embodiment, the average particle size is in the range of about 0.02 to about 0.06 microns. As noted above, the resulting UUD may then be employed to coat and/or seal an aging, chalky, rough and/or powdery surface. It is particularly useful in coating pavement or roofing surfaces. It is also useful in coating metal and plastic surfaces; "rubbery" surfaces such as some roofs; asphalt and concrete pavements; as a "cold patch" mixture or to coat same; and to underbodies; etc. The UUD, with the select particle size described above, may also be used to modify a waterborne latex-containing composition, or water-borne asphalt-containing composition; it may also be used to modify a latex-containing composition which is then employed to in turn modify a water-borne asphalt-containing composition. These compositions are likewise useful in coating and/or sealing an aging, chalky, rough, powdery and/or flexible surface in need of such coating or sealing, particularly roofing and pavement surfaces. Other surfaces which are particularly well suited for coating in accordance with the instant application include, without limitation, metals, woods, concrete, and plastics, etc. It has been observed that employing these UUDs (at the selected particle ' size) to modify other coating or paving composition, e.g., asphalt or latex compositions, even at very low levels, results in fairly dramatic improvements in performance of the composition so modified. While minimum levels of UUD of about 5 to about 10 percent (by weight of solids) are preferred, levels as low of about one-half (1/2) to one percent (1%) by weight have been demonstrated to be extremely effective in certain environments. An asphalt emulsion, which can be anionic, cationic or nonionic, is added to the UUD prepared as described above to prepare the UUD/asphalt compositions of the present invention. The asphalt can be added to the waterborne urethane-urea systems described above (with or without modification with latex) by any conventional manner. A number of commercial asphalt emulsions on the market may be employed to prepare such composition. When the asphalt emulsion is cationic, the pH should be adjusted with a base material such as triethanolamine or ammonium hydroxide to increase the pH value to greater than 7, and preferably between about 8 and 10 before addition. If the asphalt is anionic the pH must generally be higher than 7. A "neutral" asphalt emulsion generally has a pH of about 7. Both high penetration and low penetration asphalt may be employed. Simple admixing with the urethane-urea will generally suffice. It is preferred that the asphalt be added in the following method. The asphalt emulsion is slowly added to a container to which the UUD (or UUD/latex blend as described below) has been previously added. The mixing is carried out under a medium agitation until the addition of asphalt emulsion is finished and a homogeneous mixture is formed. The weight ratios of the UUD (or UUD/latex blend) to the added asphalt emulsion is preferably from about 5% to about 95%, more preferably about 5% to about 50%; still more preferably about 5% to about 30%; and still more preferably about 10% to about 30%; by weight of total solids; but again, lower levels of the UUD or UUD/latex blend may be employed, e.g., as low as one-half (1/2) to one percent (1%) weight by total solids. 'A defoamer may be employed at a level of 0.1% to about 5% and preferably about 0.3% to about 2%, based upon total solids. The defoamer is added with slow agitation to release air bubbles before finishing the preparation of the modified asphalt emulsion. Pigments, thickening agents, and anti-oxidants are optionally employed. As used herein, the term asphalt includes all useful bituminous materials; useful material can be substantially any pyrogennous distallate or tars composed mainly of hydrocarbons with small or trace amounts of heterocyclic compounds containing sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, and the like. Such materials may be selected from the group consisting of straight run asphalt, air-blown asphalt, cracked asphalt, and mixtures thereof. Particularly preferred are asphalt emulsions manufactured by Koch Material Companv under the tradename 5980; other similar materials are useful. A typical formula for an anionic asphalt emulsion with a medium setting rate which would be used as a topcoat according to the present invention is as follows: A fast setting grade would have the following formula: These components would be dispersed in any one of a variety of colloid mills, all of which work on the same basic principle ~ a high speed rotor moving within a fixed stator. Openings can vary between .005 and .030 inches. The speed is between 1000 and 6000 revolutions per minute. A description of such a mill is shown in U.S. Patent 2,260,834. The tall oil is added to a sodium hydroxide solution in the water. The mixture is heated with agitation until the tall oil dissolves in the sodium hydroxide solution to form the soap. The asphalt is then heated until its viscosity is less than 300 seconds Saybolt Furol. The two phases — the heated asphalt and the soap solutions — are added to the face of the mill. The emulsion is formed in the mill by the high shearing forces. Particle size will be approximately 4 microns. The more important properties of UUD modified asphalt emulsions are tensile strength, elongation, and retention of elongation at low temperatures. It has been observed that if tensile strength of the UUD/asphalt emulsion composition is important, a UUD with a high hard segments percentage should be employed. Conversely, if elongation is more important, a UUD with a low hard segments percentage should be employed. The UUD can be used to prepare some additional novel compounds, in which UUD will be blended, preferably prior to the addition of asphalt, with various vinylic latices in a container equipped with an electrical stirrer at room temperature. A range of different ratios (by weight of solids) may be employed. For example 1 to 90, and preferably 10 to 90 parts of an anionic, cationic or nonionic UUD may be blended with 90 to 10 parts of various vinylic latices. More preferably, a ratio of about 30 parts to about 50 parts of UUD (by weight of solids) is employed. In order to avoid phase separation or other precipitations, the pH value of the UUD modified latices added should be higher than 7, and preferably between about 8 and 10. The mixing process is carried out in a suitable container until a homogenous uniform blend is formed. As will be appreciated by the skilled artisan, the final composition can be characterized and evaluated by solids content, viscosity, tensile strength, elongation, glass transition temperature, or low temperature flexibility properties. The asphalt emulsion is then added to the UUD modified latex as described above for the UUD. The UUD modified latex compositions, as described above or when used to further modify an asphalt composition, are particularly useful in the treatment or coatings of roofs and/or pavement surfaces, by employing the additives disclosed herein, such as surfactants, pigments, fillers, wetting, agents, anti-oxidants, defoamers, adhesion promoters, u.v. stabilizers, thickening agents, biocides, anti-microbials, and the like. The polyurethane-urea dispersion may also employ other latices. For example, the composition may employ many types of acrylics; synthetic and natural rubbers; neoprenes; nitrile rubber; butyl rubber; polybutadiene; styrene-acrylic; styrene- butadiene; acrylonitrile; styrene-butadiene or styrene -isoprene block copolymers (e.g., "Kraton" by Shell Chemical); and chlorosulfonated polyethylene ("Hypalon" by duPont). It is often desirable for ease of application to thicken the compositions of the present invention, particularly those employing a latex; in short, it may be necessary or desirable to increase its viscosity. Useful thickeners for use in the compositions and methods of the present invention, include, for example, urea copolymers of polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyacrylates, polyacrylamides, .polesterpolyols, polyether polyols, silicates, synthetic cellulose derivatives and preferably the cellulose ether derivatives, such as, for example, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, e.g., Methocel. The thickening can also be attained by the utilization of solid filler materials, such as calcium carbonates, fumed silica, clays, mica, aluminum pastes, aluminum flakes, polyolefins. Materials such as the calcined clays or hydrated alumina, which are very fine particulate powders, are compatible at up to 50% by weight of the total latex solids. At the higher concentrations of such filler materials, a mastic may be formed. Certain of the filler materials are useful as pigments and include, for example, carbon black and other conventional pigments which provide a white or other color to the final resin film. For use as a pigment, generally only from about 0.5 to about 15% by weight is necessary. The pigments or fillers are preferably added as dispersions, either in aqueous or non-aqueous systems. The non-aqueous systems, are generally, preferably, at least partially miscible in water. If desired, however, the particulate material can be added directly as a powder. Stabilizers against discoloration and aging, such as any of the well known antioxidants and ultraviolet screening materials can also be employed in the compositions and methods of the present invention as desired for the particular purpose for which a film is to be used. Plasticizing agents can also be utilized, such as the phosphate esters, which, in addition to their plasticizing activity also act as emulsifiers, especially in combination with the alkoxylated alkylphenols. Biocides and/or antimicrobials may also be employed. The final UUD preferably contains from about 25 to 70% by weight of solids in water and most preferably from about 30% to about 65% by weight of solids. The preferred average particle size for UUD's of the present invention is as express about, i.e., less than one micron; in one highly preferred embodiment the preferred average particle size are in the range of between about 0.02 and about 0.06 microns. This relatively small particle size (less than one micron) is important in that, among other benefits, it gives rise to dramatically better performance, especially when used as a modifier of asphalt and/or latex, chalky and/or flexible surfaces. The latices which are obtained in accordance with the present invention are generally stable at ambient temperatures, and can be used to produce films, for instance, which have reproducible, consistent properties, including especially water resistance and adhesion. The following are examples of the products and the processes for preparing said products according to this invention. The examples are not intended to be exclusive of the full scope of this invention, but merely set out certain preferred embodiments thereof. EXAMPLE GROUP A EXAMPLE A-l Preparation of a UUD Poly(oxypropylene)glycol (PPG, MW=2000) 100 parts (by wt.), demoistured at 80°-90°C under vacuum for about 10 hours, is added in a reaction kettle equipped with electrical stirrer, thermometer, dry nitrogen inlet and heating jacket. Dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA) 6.7, N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) 14.6 and dibutyltin dilaurate (T12) 0.05% (based on the total weight of prepolymer) is then added to above reaction kettle and heated to 60° ± 5°C with stirring under dry nitrogen for about 5-10 min. until a uniform mixture was formed. Biscyclohexylmethane-4, 4'diisocyanate (Hι 2 MDI) 39.3g is then added and the reaction of preparing the pendant carboxylic acid - containing polyurethane (PU) prepolymer was carried out at 85° - 90°C for 3-4 hr. with stirring under dry nitrogen until the NCO content of the prepolymer was close to the theoretical calculation according to the titration of n-dibutylamine. The temperature is decreased to about 70°C and triethylamine (TEA) lO.lg is added. The neutralization between the pendant carboxylic acid of PU prepolymer and the tertiary amine of TEA is carried out at about 70°C for 30-40 min. After the temperature is decreased to about 45°C, a certain amount of distilled water (based on about 35% solids) is added under vigorous agitation to carry out the dispersion of the neutralized PU prepolymer in water. The chain extension is carried out at room temperature under vigorous agitation by adding hydrazine (HZ) 1.6g or ethylenediamine (EDA) 3.0g, which is diluted with water to about 50% solids, in the neutralized prepolymer dispersion. The final product is typically a translucent dispersion with 32% solids, 70-80 cps RT and pH = 7.5-8.0. The dispersion is cast in a glass mold which is coated with a release agent at room temperature ("RT'). After the dried film is formed at RT it is put in oven at 50-60°C overnight before testing the properties. EXAMPLE A-2 Preparation of a UUD The preparation and equipment are same as that described in Example A-l except that PPG (MW=1000) lOOg, DMPA 13.4g,NMP 19.2g, H 12 MDI 78.6g and 0.05% of T12 are used to prepare PU prepolymer; TEA 20.2g as well as HZ 3.2g are used to carry out both dispersion and chain extension. A transparent polyurethane ("PU") dispersion is obtained and a dried film is formed for testing. Both tensile strength and modulus increased but elongation decreased when the concentration of COOH or DMPA was increased. EXAMPLE A-3 Preparation of a UUD The preparation and equipment are same as that described in Example A-l except that PPG (MW=1000) lOOg, DMPA 13.4g,NMP 19.2g, IPDI 66.6g and 0.05% of T12 are used to prepare PU prepolymer and TEA 20.2g as well as HZ 3.2g are used to carry out both dispersion and chain extension. A transparent PU dispersion was obtained with 35% solids and pH=7-8. Dried films were then prepared in the manner described in Example A-l for testing mechanical properties. As the temperature of the dispersion was increased above room temperature the tensile strength and modulus decreased although elongation increased. EXAMPLE A-4 Preparation of a UUD The preparation and equipment are same as that described in Example A-l except that PPG (MW=2000) lOOg, DMPA 6.7g, NMP 13.3g, toluene diisocyanate (TDI) 26. lg are reacted at 80° - 85°C for about 2 hr. with no catalyst under dry nitrogen. The PU prepolymer 146.1g is added to a container which contains both water and TEA(lO.lg) at room temperature under vigorous agitation to carry out both neutralization and dispersion. Hyrazine (HZ, 1.6g) diluted with water is slowly added in the above neutralized prepolymer dispersion under vigorous agitation to carry out the chain extension at room temperature. A translucent PU was obtained with 30-35% solids, pH=7-8. Dried films were then prepared for the measurement of properties. EXAMPLE A-5 Preparation of a UUD The preparation and equipment are the same as that described in Example A-l except that PTMG (ρoly(oxytetramethylene)glycol) (MW=2000) lOOg, DMPA 6.7g,NMP 13.3g, toluene diisocyanate (TDI) 26. lg is reacted at 80° - 85°C for about 2 hr with no catalyst under dry nitrogen. The dispersion and chain extension may be carried out by the three methods as shown below: Method 1. The prepolymer is neutralized with TEA at first and then dispersed in water containing HZ to carry out both dispersion and chain extension. Method 2. The prepolymer is neutralized and dispersed in water containing TEA. HZ is then added to carry out chain extension. Method 3. The prepolymer is neutralized, dispersed and chain- extended in water containing TEA and HZ. Dried films are then prepared for testing purposes. The mechanical properties of this UUD are better than one's of Example A-4. The UUD of Example A-4 may also be blended with this UUD at various ratios. EXAMPLE A-6 Preparation of a UUD The preparation and equipment are the same as that described in Example A-l except that PPG (MW=2000) 150g, DMPA lO.lg, TEA 7.6g, Hz 3.2g, NMP 17.2g was used; the typical (for these examples) NCO/OH ratio of 1.5 and NCO/NHz ratio of 1.0 were also employed. EXAMPLE GROUP B EXAMPLE B-l Preparation of UUD-Modified Acrylic dispersions The UUD of Example A-2 is blended with various acrylic dispersions at 50/50 (based on solids) ratio at room temperature in a container under agitation until a homogeneous dispersion was formed. The dispersion blends are cast in the release agent coated mold at room temperature and the film after being dried at room temperature is kept in oven at 50 - 60°C for about 15 hrs. until water or some co-solvent is completely removed from the film. The sample films are aged at room temperature for one or two days before testing the properties. The appropriate curing condition for the sample films is typically room temperature for one week and 80°C for one day. Alternatively, a ratio of about 30 parts to about 50 parts of UUD (by weight of solids) is employed. These UUD modified acrylic dispersions, exhibit very good adhesion to chalky surfaces of weathered PIB (polyisobutylene rubber). EXAMPLE B-2 Preparation of UUD-Modified styrene-acrylic dispersions. The UUD of Example 2 is blended with a highly preferred styrene-acrylic dispersion RES 1019 or 10526 (by Unocal Polymers) by using same procedure as that described in Example B-l. The blends from RES 1019 typically have better properties than one from RES 10526. EXAMPLE GROUP C Three properties of a sealant are very important: Tensile strength, elongation and retention of elongation properties at low temperatures. In the examples below, to be satisfactory, the elongation capacity should be greater than 80%; tensile strength should exceed 200 psi. EXAMPLE C-l Mixtures of an anionic asphalt and a UUD from Example A-2 are made as follows. The asphalt emulsion is added relatively slowly, with agitation, to the required amount of UUD. Mixtures are made slowly, and a number of samples are prepared with increasing percentages of UUD from 0 to 50%, or the desired percentage. It is important to add the asphalt to the UUD. They are then applied at a thickness of about 0.010 inches to silicone coated release paper, allowed to cure at room temperature for two days and then at 60°C for two days. Then tensile properties of the dried film are determined. To test for elongation capacity at low temperatures, a bend test is run. A bend test was made by applying about .010 inches of the 0, 30 and 50% UUD: asphalt (by solids) composition to aluminum panels. Cured as above, they are then immersed in a dry ice bath at -20° for 5 min and immediately bent at 180°C. The results show that the cured asphalt emulsion has a tensile strength of only about 8 psi, while all the mixtures of asphalt and UUD have satisfactory tensile properties. The elongation capacities of mixtures with more than 20% of the UUD were satisfactory, with 30% being the preferred amount for roofing use, 50% for uses requiring very high tensile strengths such as traffic bearing waterproofing membranes. In the bend test, the asphalt failed while the 30 and 50% UUD:Asphalt showed satisfactory results. EXAMPLE C-2 Mixtures are made using the higher elongation UUD of Example A-6. Mixing, curing and testing were the same as Example C-1. The 180° bend test results show that at 20, 30 and 50% UUD satisfactory results are obtained. At 20, 30 and 50% UUD, the results are also satisfactory. With this UUD, 20% is the preferred ratio. EXAMPLE C-3 Mixtures using a UUD made with a TDI base (Example A-4) are prepared. Mixing procedures, coating, curing and testing procedures are the same as those shown in Example C-1 (absent the bend test). Mixtures from 10 to 100% UUD are tested. It is found that levels as low as 10% UUD gave good elongation, while 20%-30% would be the preferred UUD concentration. EXAMPLE D A test can be run to determine the wetting properties and resistance to rutting of pavements made with the addition of UUDs as compared with an unmodified asphalt emulsion, even when employed at very low levels. The UUD is made with IPDI (example No. A-3). The asphalt emulsion can be made with high penetratic asphalt for use with chip seal pavements. A mixture of graded aggregates is mixed with 8% by weight of: a mixture of UUD (1.6%) and an asphalt emulsion (6.4%) The mixtures are compacted in a cylinder required for the split tensile and Marshall tests. The mixed material is much better wetted than the asphalt only. The addition of the UUD (1.6%)/asphalt emulsion (6.4%) wets the aggregate more thoroughly. The cylinders are then aged 2 days at 50°C and force is applied to the warm cylinders. The results are shown in the table that follows: The results of the Marshall test are especially important. Ordinarily, with t asphalt (not an emulsion) the Marshall test will run between 2000 and 3000 pounds. The excellent results appear to be due to the improvement in the wetting the aggregate by the asphalt emulsion. EXAMPLE GROUP E TYPICAL FORMULATIONS A: UUD, parts by weight of solids B: Latex, parts by weight of solids C: Asphalt emulsion, parts by weight of solids B Example EXAMPLE GROUP F Various novel blends and modified asphalt emulsions were prepared as follows: 1. UUD with acrylic latex (1019) 2. UUD with natural latex (NR) 3. UUD, acrylic and natural latex (NR) 4. UUD or novel blends modified asphalt emulsion The blending process was carried out at room temperature by using a stirrer with variable speed for about 10 min. until a homogeneous mixture was formed. The UUD used is from Example A-l unless otherwise noted. TABLE 1 Table 1 shows the properties of UUD-acrylic latex (1019) with various blending ratios. The UUD is made by using IPDI and the results indicate that the tensile strength of blends is generally increased with an increasing concentration of UUD. However, the elongation of blends did not change except for the 80/20 ratio. All blends with different ratios are homogeneous. The results imply that one can change tensile strength without affecting elongation of blends. TABLE 2 Table 2 shows the properties of blends which are made by using UUD and acrylic 1019. However, the UUD is made by H 12 MDI and dipropylene glycol monoether acetate (DPMA) as a replacement of "NMP". The results indicate that the tensile strength of the blends increase with increasing amounts of UUD, but elongation decreases with increasing UUD. TABLE 3 Some general properties of UUD-NR blends are shown in Table 3. Three types of natural latex ("NR") are used and the properties of both NR and blends before and after heating age are shown. Both tensile strength and elongation of blends with 50/50 ratios (on solids) increase by introducing UUD, compared to the properties of NR itself. Elongation of blends decrease about 10% after heating age. This suggests that an antioxidant should be introduced to avoid the oxidation of NR. TABLE 4 IPDI based UUD is blended with NR at various ratios as shown in Table 4. The results indicate that the tensile strength of the blends decrease with increasing NR. Elongation also decreases except for 60/40 ratio. TABLE 5 Two types of asphalt emulsion are modified by UUD at various ratios (on solids) as shown in Table 5. Asphalt A is a hard type with a low penetration degree and asphalt B apparently is a soft type with a high penetration degree. The acidic clay inside asphalt B resulted in a compatibility problem with UUD. A pretreatment of asphalt B with triethanolamine (TEAL) is carried out to improve both tensile strength and elongation (see Table 5. 70/30 ratio). With increasing amounts of TEAL elongation increases but tensile strength decreases (see Table 5 80/20 ratio). Both tensile strength and elongation of UUD modified asphalt emulsion increase with increasing amounts of UUD. TABLE 6 The properties of various blends and blends modified asphalt emulsion are shown in Table 6. NR/UUD (50/50) exhibits higher tensile strength but lower elongation compared to NR/UUD/1019 (30/40/30). UUD modified asphalt (20/80) showed higher tensile strength but low elongation compared to acrylic latex 1019/asphalt (20/80). NR/UUD (6/8/6/80) show higher elongation and tensile strength compared to NR/UUD/asphalt. TABLES 7 AND 8 The UUD modified asphalt emulsion (20/80) exhibits excellent low temperature impact strength compared to 1019 modified asphalt, (see Tables 7 and 8.) TABLE 9 Various types of asphalt emulsions are modified by UUD at a 20/80 ratio (UUD/asphalt) as shown in Table 9. Five parts of either Triton 101 or TEAL (based on 100 parts of asphalt) are used to pretreat the asphalt emulsion. All modified asphalt emulsions show excellent properties, especially the asphalt emulsion from Hy-Grade Corp. TABLE 10 The properties of various modified asphalt emulsions based on the Hy-Grade Corp. product are shown in Table 10. Formulations 1-3 are based on 90% (solids) of asphalt and 4-8 are based on 80% of asphalt. All modified asphalt emulsions show good tensile strength and elongation before and after heating age except formulations 5 and 7, which show low elongation after heating age. All modified asphalt emulsions based on acrylic latex 1019 fail a 180° bending test (at -20°C) and all modified asphalt emulsions based on UUD pass the bending test except formulations 2 and 3, which contain UUD concentrations which appear to be too low for this particular application. TABLE 11 The properties of NR/UUD (Example A-3 based on IPDI) before and after heating and aging are shown in Table 11. The results indicate that the tensile strength of blends increase and elongation decreases about 2-3% from the original value after heat aging. TABLE 12 Two types of asphalt emulsions (from Japan; see Table 16) are modified by two blends, one is UUD/1019 and another is UUD/NR/1019. The properties before and after heat aging are shown in Table 12. The results indicate that DP asphalt is better than Fl asphalt and UUDl/1019 show better properties than UUD/NR/1019 after heat aging. TABLE 13 Asphalt emulsion from Hy-Grade Corp. is modified by UUD, NR, UUD NR and UUD/acrylic latex/1019 as shown in Table 13. After heat aging, both modified asphalt emulsion based on NR and UUD/NR result in very poor elongation because of oxidation of NR. However, both modified asphalt emulsions based on UUD and UUD/acrylic latex/1019 exhibit good properties after heat aging, in particular UUD/acrylic latex/1019. TABLE 14 Asphalt emulsion with a low penetration degree (harder than Hy-Grade asphalt emulsion) is modified by UUD, NR, 1019, UUD/NR and UUD/1019 as shown in Table 14. All modified asphalt emulsions with 90% of asphalt emulsion and all modified asphalt emulsions with acrylic latex 1019 fail the 180° bending test. However, all modified asphalt emulsions based on UUD, NR and 80% of asphalt pass the bending test. This test is based upon U.S.T.M. test . TABLE 15 Asphalt emulsions from both Hy-Grade Corp. and Japan modified by UUD or blends are listed showing 180° peel strength to chalked asphalt paper. UUD modified Hy-Grade asphalt gives high peel strength and UUD/acrylic latex/1019 modified asphalt (Japan) exhibits better peel strength. TABLE 16 Various properties of useful commercially available asphalt emulsions are tested. Table 1. Effect of various blending ratios of acrylic latex 1019 with IPDI based UUD on the mechanical properties of blends. Solids content is 50% for 1019 and 28.6% for IPDI based UUD. The blending ratios are based on solids. Table 2. Effect of various blending ratios of acrylic latex 1019 with DPMA based UUD on the mechanical properties of blends. Solids content is 50% for 1019 and 36.7% for DPMA (dipropylene glycol monoether acetate) based UUD. The blending ratios are based on solids. Table 3. Effect of various natural latices and blends of natural latices with UUD on the mechanical properties before and after heat aging. Table 4. Effect of various blending ratios of NR/IPDI-UUD on the properties of blends. IPDI based UUD. Table 5. Effect of various blending ratios of UUD asphalt emulsions on the mechanical properties of blends Based on asphalt emulsion. TEAL - Triethanolamine 2). Based on solids. Both asphalt A and B are made by a Japanese company. Table 6. Effect of various blends and blending ratios on the mechanical properties of blends Note: NR (En 407) and NR (A-Line): From Ennar Latex, Inc. about 61% solids. UUD:UUD was prepared by using DPMA as solvent. Asph.:Asphalt emulsion with about 58% solids and pH is greater than 7. All blending ratios are based on solids. The samples were dried at room temperature for two days and in oven at 60°C for 24 hours before test. Table 7. Comparison of low temperature impact strength between UUD and acrylic latex (1019) modified asphalt emulsions The aluminum panel with modified asphalt was immersed in a -20°C cold bath for 5 min. before testing. (P - pass, F - fail). Table 8. Comparison of flexibility between UUD and acrylic modified asphalt emulsions* The aluminum panel with modified asphalt was immersed in a -20°C cold bath for 5 min. before 180° bending. Table 9. Effect of various asphalt emulsions on the properties of UUD modified asphalt emulsion Basic formulations - See Table 16 Table 10. Mechanical properties of HY-G asphalt emulsion modified by UUD, NR and acrylic latex 1019 (P - Pass, F - Fail) Table 11. Effect of various blending ratios of NR/IPDI-UUD on the properties of blends IPDI based UUD Table 12. Effect of heat aging on the properties of modified asphalt emulsion (Heat aging conditions: 60°C x 6 days + 80°C x 1 day) The properties after heating aging are shown in the bracket Table 13. Effect of heat aging on the properties of modified Hy-G asphalt emulsion (Heat aging conditions:60°C x 21 days + 80°C x 1 day) Table 14. Effect of various modified asphalt emulsions on 180° bending test (at -20°C) The modified asphalt emulsion is coated on a standard steel panel by using a doctor blade. After one week at RT the sample panel is immersed into a dry ice/acetone/water bath for 5 to 10 min. The sample panel is then taken out to carry out 180° bending test immediately. Table 15. Effect of various modified emulsions on the peel strength of the modified asphalt emulsions to chalked asphalt paper Table 16. Properties of various commercial asphalt emulsions TABLES 17 AND 18 Tables 17 and 18 demonstrate the importance of particle size of the UUD in the compositions and methods of the present invention. The IPDI based UUD modified natural latex (NR) or asphalt emulsions exhibited better properties tensile strength (T t ) and elongation (E) than H 12 MDI based UUD modified NR or asphalt. This is due to the fact that the particle size of the UUD plays an important role in the fixed property of UUD modified latex or asphalt. Table 17. Effect of particle size in UUD on the properties of modified natural latex. *) Based on solids Table 18. Effect of particle size of UUD on the properties of modified asphalt emulsion. 1) Aliphatic diisocyanate used in the preparation of UUD. 2) The properties of asphalt emulsion are as follows: The modified asphalt emulsion was based on the following basic formula (on solids):

Claims: CLAIMS What is Claimed is: 1. An improved coating or sealing composition comprising a water borne asphalt emulsion which has been modified by the inclusion of a urea urethane dispersion wherein said urethane urea dispersion has an average particle size of less than about one micron. 2. The coating composition according to claim 1 wherein said urethane urea dispersion is anionic. 3. The coating composition according to claim 1, wherein said urethane urea dispersion is cationic. 4. The coating composition according to claim 1, wherein said urethane urea dispersion is nonionic. 5. The coating composition according to claim 1, wherein said asphalt emulsion further comprises at least one additive. 6. The coating composition according to claim 5, wherein said additive is selected from a group consisting of wetting agents, antioxidants, defoamers, adhesion promoters, u.v. stabilizers, thickening agents, and mixtures thereof. 7. An improved coating composition comprising a water borne asphalt emulsion modified by the addition of a urethane urea dispersion-modified latex, wherein said urethane urea dispersion has an average particle size of about one micron. 8. The coating composition according to claim 7, wherein said urethaine urea dispersion is anionic. 9. The coating composition according to claim 7, wherein said urethane urea dispersion is cationic. 10. The coating composition according to claim 7, wherein said urethane urea dispersion is nonionic. 11. The coating composition according to claim 7, wherein said latex is selected from a group consisting of acrylic latices, natural latices, synthetic latices, vinyl-based latices, epoxy-based latices, neoprene-based latices, natural rubber-based latices, chloro sulfinate vinyl-based latices, butyl rubber-based latices, ethylene-propylene- isoprene (diene) copolymer modified latices, and mixtures thereof. 12. The coating composition according to Claim 7, wherein said asphalt emulsion further comprises at least one additive. 13. The coating composition according to Claim 12, wherein said additive is selected from a group consisting of wetting agents, antioxidants, defoamers, u.v. stabilizers, adhesion promoters, thickening agents and mixtures thereof. 14. A coating composition according to claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 or 13 wherein said urethane urea dispersion is present at a level of about 1 to about 90 percent, by weight of solids. 14. A coating composition according to claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 or 13 wherein said urethane urea dispersion is present at a level of about 10 to about 90 percent, by weight of solids. 15. A coating composition according to claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 or 13 wherein said urethane urea dispersion is present at a level of about 30 to about 50 percent, by weight of solids. 16. A method of applying a protective coating to a surface in need of such coating comprising applying a composition prepared according to claims 1 or 7 and allowing said composition to cure. 17. A method of applying a protective coating to a surface in need of such coating comprising applying a composition which includes a water borne urethane urea dispersion wherein said urethane urea dispersion has an average particle size of about 0.65 microns and is present at a level of up to about 90% by weight of solids. 18. A method of applying a coating composition according to Claim 17, wherein said urethane urea dispersion is anionic. 19. A method of applying a coating composition according to Claim 17, wherein said urethane urea dispersion is cationic. 20. A method of applying a coating composition according to Claim 17, wherein said urethane urea dispersion is nonionic. 21. A method of applying a coating composition according to Claim 17, wherein said urethane urea dispersion is H 12 MDI-based. 22. A method of applying a coating composition according to Claim 17, wherein said urethane urea dispersion is IPDI-based. 23. A method of applying a coating composition according to Claim 17, wherein said urethane urea dispersion is TDI-based. 24. A method of applying a coating composition according to Claim 17, wherein said composition is applied to a roof. 25. A method of applying a coating composition according to Claim 17, wherein said composition is applied to a chalky surface. 26. A method of applying a coating composition according to Claim 17, wherein said composition is applied to a paved surface. 27. A method of applying a protective coating to a surface in need of such coating, comprising applying a composition containing a latex wherein said latex containing composition is modified by the inclusion of an urethane urea dispersion according to claims 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, or 23, and wherein said urethane urea dispersion is present in said composition at a level of up to 95%, by weight of solids. 28. A method of applying a coating composition according to Claim 27, wherein said latex further comprises at least one additive. 29. A method of applying a coating composition according to Claim 28, wherein the latex is selected from the group consisting of acrylic latices, natural latices, synthetic latices, vinyl-based latices, epoxy-based latices, neoprene-based latices, natural rubber-based latices, chloro sulfinate vinyl-based latices, butyl rubber-based latices, ethylene-propylene-isoprene (diene) copolymer modified latices, and mixtures thereof.

Inventors: EVANS ROBERT M, FRISCH KURT C, XIAO HAN X, EVANS, ROBERT, M., FRISCH, KURT, C., XIAO, HAN, X.
Applicants: ROBERT M EVANS ASSOCIATES INC, ROBERT M. EVANS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Application year: 1992
Main classification: C08K3
IPC codes: C08L75, C08L95, C09D175, C09D195