ABSORBENTS

Abstract: Hydrotalcite-like materials demonstrate absorption properties for, e.g., metal ions and dyes. The efficiency of absorption is improved by forming the hydrotalcite-like materials in the presence of a carrier, e.g. silica. Composite materials are formed by this procedure.

Description: ABSORBENTS Field of the Invention This invention relates to composite materials intended for use as absorbents and comprising hydrotalcite-like materia1. Background to the Invention The absorption properties of hydrotalcite-like materials are characterised in the literature. When using any absorbent, for example in absorbing metal ions or dyes, it is essential to ensure the absorbent is used efficiently while retaining the desired absorption characteristics. General description of the invention Hydrotalcite-like materials are absorbents which, while well documented as absorbents, do not always exhibit the efficiency required for economic use in some applications. This reduced efficiency follows from the slow rate of diffusion of absorbed material through the hydrotalcite-like product particles to active sites in the particle interior. The present invention provides a method of preparing a composite material in which a hydrotalcite-like material is provided with improved accessibility by being formed in the presence of a matrix material. Thus the composite material comprises hydrotalcite-like material formed in situ and deposited on a matrix material. The chemical and physical form of the matrix, on which the hydrotalcite-like material is formed in situ, will be dependent upon the intended end use of the composite. The matrix can be inert or capable of providing a complementary function, e.g. absorption. Thus, for detergent compositions, which will usually be in particulate form, the matrix may be selected from:- i) zeolites, which would provide a detergency building function; ii) clays, which would provide absorbent properties; and iii) silicas, capable of providing, e.g. anticorrosion in the wash liquor. A form of absorbent suitable for continuous contact with a liquid medium has the matrix surface in the shape of a tube on the surface of which is deposited hydrotalcite-like material. The medium carrying the absorbate would then be passed down the tube in a continuous stream. A bundle of such tubes could be used to increase the capacity and this bundle may be formed as a unitary body. Examples of a medium for which this form of matrix would be suitable are effluents and solutions of dyes or suspensions of pigments from textile dyeing. Appropriate matrices for these media would be silicas, clays, other filter aids and ceramic bodies. The absorbent composite material, when in the form of particles, could be retained in a cartridge through which the medium is passed, or in a sachet which allows the medium to pass through the sachet walls and contact the composite material within. The invention thus includes composite materials comprising i) hydrotalcite-like materials deposited on the external surface of matrix particles whose size is chosen to meet the application requirements or, ii) hydrotalcite-like material deposited within pores or channels of a porous particle or monolithic matrix. The hydrotalcite-like material would normally be present in a weight ratio of 10:90 to 90:10 with respect to the matrix material. The materials used for the matrix may be inert, or may also provide a second function e.g. complementary absorbency. This latter can be provided by silicas, clays, alu inosilicates and ion exchange materials. The integrity of the composite may be improved with the aid of binders, e.g. silicate or organic polymers to promote cohesion. The invention extends to a method of forming the composite material wherein the matrix material is placed in an aqueous medium, precursors for the hydrotalcite-like material are reacted in the medium to deposit the hydrotalcite-like product on the matrix and the composite material recovered. The product composite may, if in particulate form, require comminution, e.g. in an air mill, to provide the desired size range. The effective absorbent in the composite material is a hydrotalcite-like material, such term includes the calcined material. Thus, the present invention utilises anion exchange materials related to a compound of the formula Mg,Al (OH) . -C0 .4H_0 known as hydrotalcite, and for convenience referred to hereinafter as hydrotalcite-like materials. The hydrotalcite-like materials useful as absorbents are described by formula I below: where: M is any 1+ or 2+ cation or combination thereof N is any 3+ or 4+ cation or combination thereof k is the sum of the individual mole fractions of the 1+ cations m is the sum of the individual mole fractions of the 2+ cations n is the sum of the individual mole fractions of the 3+ cations p is the sum of the individual mole fractions of the 4+ cations where either but not both of k and m or n and p can be zero and k+m+n+p=l. A γ" is any anion of charge y- and mole fraction z, or combination of aniσns of similar or differing y- and k+2m+3n+4p-2-zy=0 and x can range from 1 to 100. Examples of the cations M in the above formula are τ Li.+, „Mg2+, Z „n 2+, „Fe 2+, C_u2+, S„n2+, C„a2+ and, S „r 2+ Suitable N cations include Al 3+, Fe3+, Ti4+ and Sn4+ Preferred divalent cations are Zn , Cu or Mg or a combination of these ions, or a combination with other divalent cations. The anion A may be an inorganic or organic anion. Preferred inorganic anions A are CI -, N0_-, SO 2—, CO 2- and OH . Examples of organic anions are carboxylate ions such as citrate and stearate. Examples of hydrotalcite-like materials of this invention are:- Zn 16 Al 2 (OH) 36 (Cl 2 ) xH 2 0 Mg 6 Al 2 (0H) 16 (N0 3 ) 2 XH 2 0 Cu 16 Al 2 (0H) 36 (Cl 2 ) XH 2 0 Preparation of hydrotalcite-like compounds is known and has been described in a number of publications including Solid State Ionics 22 (1986) pages 135-141 where there is published a paper by Walter T Reichle entitled "Synthesis of Anionic Clay Minerals (Mixed Metal Hydroxides, Hydrotalcite)*• and Che tech (January 1986) pages 58-63 where there is published a paper by Walter T Reichle entitled "Anionic Clay Minerals". A zinc/aluminium hydrotalcite-like material useful in the present invention may be prepared in one of the following ways or in other ways known in the art: 1. A 1 mol dm solution of an 8:1 molar ratio of zinc chloride and aluminium chloride was prepared. To -3 this a 2 mol dm solution of sodium hydroxide was added until the original pH of the chloride solution had been increased from around 3 to pH 6.75. This resulted in the formation of a white gel-like precipitate which was separated by centrifuging. The precipitate was then washed by suspension in demineralised water followed by centrifuging. This washing process was repeated several times. The gel was then dried at 80°C to 100°C and ground to a fine powder. _3 2. A 1 mol dm solution of an 8:1 molar ratio of zinc chloride and aluminium chloride was prepared and simultaneously pumped into a 5 litre beaker, fitted with a stirrer, along with a 5 mol dm solution of sodium hydroxide. The rate of addition of sodium hydroxide was varied to maintain a pH of 6.5 in the reaction mixture. The resulting gel was separated and washed as described above. Particles of the washed precipitate were then dried in different ways:- a) spray dried; b) slurried in alcohol, filtered and oven dried at 50°C. The resulting precipitate was then hammer milled to form a fine powder; c) slurried in nonionic surfactant (Synperonic A7 ex ICI) filtered and oven dried at 50°C. The resulting precipitate was then hammer milled to form a fine powder. A magnesium/aluminium hydrotalcite-like material useful in the present invention may be prepared in the following way or in other ways known in the art. To 98 litres of water 19.5 kg of sodium hydroxide was added followed by 25kg of magnesium nitrate and 18.3kg of aluminium nitrate dissolved in 73 litres of water to give a Mg:Al molar ratio of 3:1. The nitrate solution was added over a period of 30 minutes with stirring. The solution was heated at 90°C to 100°C for 2 hours. The resulting precipitate was filtered and washed. The precipitate was treated as follows:- i) a sample was resuspended in water to give a 10% solids slurry; ii) a sample was spray dried; and iii) a sample was oven dried at approximately 120°C and micronised using a fluid energy mill. It has been found that the morphology of hydrotalcite-like materials is dependent on their method of preparation. Especially preferred are methods of preparation which give rise to porous materials such as spray drying. Literature Physical admixture of hydrotalcites with other materials is known from EPA 0278535 (Akzo) , US 4656156 (Alcoa) and US 4458030 (Kyowa) . Specific description of the invention Examples of the composite materials will now be described to illustrate but not limit the invention. EXAMPLES I AND II For these examples silica (Neosyl TS, obtainable from Crosfield Chemicals of Warrington, England with APS about 8 micron) was selected as the matrix material. The amounts of metal salts required for the hydrotalcite were calculated such that the final ratio by weight of hydrotalcite:silica was 25:75. The silica was slurried in water and two separating funnels placed above the beaker such that the metal salts and alkali solution (5M NaOH) could be added simultaneously to the slurry. The slurry was stirred at all times and the pH constantly monitored. Demineralised water was used throughout. Two separate preparations were undertaken:- I. A Zn Al hydrotalcite was prepared using a mixture of zinc chloride and aluminium chloride, Zn/Al molar ratio 8:1. The pH was kept constant at 6.5. The HT/silica composite thus prepared would have an exchangeable chloride anion. II. A Mg Al hydrotalcite was prepared using a mixture of magnesium nitrate and aluminium nitrate, Mg/Al molar ratio 3:1. The pH was kept constant at 10. The HT/silica composite thus prepared would have an exchangeable nitrate anion. Both samples were aged at 80°C for 2 hours after precipitation of the hydrotalcite. The samples were filtered, washed twice (demineralised water) and dried in the oven at 50°C. A small laboratory hammer mill was used to mill the samples which were then sieved in an 80 micron sieve to remove the larger particles, followed by sieving on a 56 micron air swept sieve to remove any fines. This gave a narrow particle size fraction in the range 56-80 micron which was used in subsequent kinetic experiments. Examples III and IV were MgAl and ZnAl hydrotalcite respectively prepared as described previously in the absence of a matrix material. The relative performance of the hydrotalcite samples was assessed by determining the rate of colorant adsorption as determined by measuring the absorbance of filtered samples of liquid, compared to a blank, at time intervals. A solution in demineralised water of l g/1 nonionic surfactant (Synperonic A7 obtainable from ICI Limited of England), 0.01 mol dm 3 sodium chloride and 0.01 g/1 dyestuff (Direct Red 80: CI 35780) was prepared. 200 ml of the solution was placed in a water bath and maintained at a temperature of either 25°C or 40°C. The solution was stirred at all times. 5 ml samples were withdrawn at timed intervals and filtered through a 0.45 μM Millipore filter. The absorbance of each sample was determined against a water/nonionic/NaCl standard at 525 nm as measured on a uv/visible spectrophotometer this being the maximum absorption for Direct Red 80. After the first reading, 0.14g of the hydrotalcite sample was added. Samples were then withdrawn at 5, 10 and 20 minute intervals. The results were calculated as absorbance ratio, A fc where:- A. = Absorbance at time t Initial Absorbance where:- t = 5, 10 or 20 minutes A low value of A. indicates higher amounts of dye absorbed on to the hydrotalcite containing sample. The results are given in Table I. Table I Absorbance ratio Examples l 10 '20 III Mg Al hydrotalcite 25°C 0.347 0.281 0.215 Particle size 50-75μm 40°C 0.323 0.311 0.264 II Mg Al hydrotalcite silica composite 25°C 0.114 0.078 Particle size 56-80xm 40°C 0.049 0.024 IV Zn Al hydrotalcite 25°C 0.449 0.230 Particle size 50-75μm 40°C 0.224 0.103 I Zn Al hydrotalcite- silica composite 25°C 0.199 0.083 0.071 Particle size 56-80μm 40°C 0.075 0.055 0.040 The results clearly show that on a weight for weight basis the HT/silica composite removes dye from solution more rapidly than the pure HT (hydrotalcite-like) material for comparable particle size fractions. These results are somewhat surprising as the HT/silica composite contains 75% less HT than the pure material. Electron microscopy showed that the HT/silica composite does not contain discrete silica particles covered in HT, but rather several silica particles held together by a HT "glue". It will be seen that the examples quote size ranges which are not exactly coextensive. However, this difference is small and it is seen that the composite particles, which provide better results, have the higher size range. The applicants have found hydrotalcite-like materials of grain size less than 110 Angstrom can absorb colorants at a faster rate than materials with a grain size greater than 110 Angstroms. These finer grain size materials also have a greater absorbant capacity. Preferably the grain size is less than 100 Angstrom, more preferably between 40 and 100 Angstrom. These grain sizes are measured in the <001> direction by X-ray diffraction. Methods A and B are routes to obtaining this finer grain size material. Method A A magnesium/aluminium hydrotalcite-like material of finer grain size useful in the present invention when deposited on a matrix may be prepared as follows: An alkali solution comprising 150 litres of a mixed sodium hydroxide/sodium carbonate alkali solution and having a total anion concentration of 5M and a hydroxide to carbonate molar ratio of 3:1, was added to a vessel containing around 66 litres of demineralised water to raise the pH from neutral to around pH 10. A solution of aluminium sulphate and magnesium sulphate having a total metal ion concentration of 2M and a magnesium to aluminium molar ratio of 3:1, was added to the vessel and the vessel contents were agitated. The rate of addition of the sulphate solution was adjusted to maintain a pH in the solution of 10 to 10.5. Immediate precipitation occurred on addition of the sulphate solution however the resulting slurry was cooled to maintain a temperature of 25°C. The reaction time was approximated 50 minutes, plus 10 minutes agitation once addition of the solutions was complete. The slurry was then pressed to form a filter cake and the cake was washed with demineralised water. The wash filtrate was tested for the presence of sulphate anion using barium chloride solution, which indicated that most of the sulphate had been removed from the cake. The cake was then air dried for 1 hour and then passed through a ring drier and then milled in a fluid energy mill to a particle size of 5 to 7 microns. Method B A magnesium/aluminium hydrotalcite-like material of finer grain size useful in the present invention when deposited on a matrix may be prepared in the following way. To 98 litres of water 19.5 kg of sodium hydroxide was added followed by 25kg of magnesium nitrate and 18.3kg of aluminium nitrate dissolved in 73 litres of water to give a Mg:Al molar ratio of 3:1. The nitrate solution was added over a period of 30 minutes with stirring. The resulting precipitate was filtered, washed and oven dried at approximately 120°C and micronised using a fluid energy mill. The following Examples illustrate the preparation of these finer grain size materials. Example V A sample of Mg/Al hydrotalcite was prepared as in method A above. The grain size of this material was measured by X-ray powder diffraction using a Philips series 17 diffractometer and Cuk radiation. The (001) reflection peak was converted into full-width-at-half- maximum values using either FWHM^ = 2.00 or FWHM g = 1.29 B B by measuring the breadth (B) and fitting these to either lorentzian or squared-lorentzian profiles. The peak position and FWHM values are inserted into the Scherrer equation described in EF Kaelbu, Handbook of X-rays, McGraw-Hill, (1967) from which the grain size can be calculated. The rate of colorant absorption of this hydrotalcite was compared to a commercially available Mg/Al hydrotalcite sold under the trade name KYOWA SHT-4A ex Kyowa by measuring the absorbance of filtered samples of liquid, as compared to a blank, at timed intervals. The rate of absorption was then expressed as an absorbance ratio. absorbance ratio = absorbance at time t = t absorbance at time t = 0 The lower the absorbance ratio, the faster the rate of colorant absorption by the hydrotalcite-like material. A solution in demineralised water of lg/1 nonionic - 3 surfactant (Synperonic A7 (ex ICI) ) , 0.01 mol dm sodium chloride and 0.01 g/1 dyestuff (Direct Red 80: (CI 35780) was prepared. 200ml of the solution was placed in a water bath and maintained at a temperature of 25°C. The solution was stirred at all times. 5ml samples were withdrawn at timed intervals and filtered through a 0.45μm Millipore filter. The absorbance of each sample was determined against a water/nonionic/NaCl standard at 525nm as measured on a UV/visible spectronometer this being the maximum absorption for Direct Red 80. After the first reading 0.14g of Mg/Al hydrotalcite according to the invention was added. Samples were then withdrawn at 1 minute intervals. This procedure was repeated with KYOWA SHT-4A. Material Grain Particle Absorbance Ratio at 525 nm Size Size t=60s t=120s t=l80s t=240s t=300s A μm Mg/Al 53 5-7 0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Hydrotalcite KYOWA 373 5-7 0.856 0.761 0.635 0.561 0.461 SHT-4A These results show that a hydrotalcite-like material of grain size less than 110 Angstroms has a faster rate of colorant absorption than a commercially available hydrotalcite. Example VI The rate of colorant absorption of a Mg/Al hydrotalcite material prepared as in method B above was compared to that of a material prepared as in method B excepting that the solution was aged by heating at 90°C to 100°C for 2 hours before being filtered, by measuring the absorbance ratio as described in Example V. The grain size of both materials was measured by the method described in Example V. Material Grain Particle Absorbance Ratio at 525 nm Size A Size μm t-60s t=120s t=180s t=240s Mg/Al 87 56-100 0.065 0.021 0.010 0.003 Hydrotalcite Method B Mg/Al 250 56-100 0.990 0.911 0.797 0.743 Hydrotalcite Method B and Aged These results show that a hydrotalcite-like material of grain size less than 110 Angstroms has a faster rate of colorant absorption than a hydrotalcite-like material of grain size 250 Angstroms. Example VII The rate of colorant absorption of a Mg/Al hydrotalcite-like material according to the invention and prepared as in method A above was compared to that of a Mg/Al hydrotalcite-like material prepared as in method B above excepting that the solution was aged by heating at 90°C to 100°C for 2 hours before being filtered, by measuring the absorbance ratio as described in Example V. The grain size of both materials was measured by the method described in Example V. Material Grain Size Particle Size Absorbance Ratio Angstroms Microns t=30s t=60s t=90s Mg/Al Hydrotalcite 53 5-7 0. 128 0. 018 0 . 004 Method A Mg/Al Hydrotalcite 250 5-7 0.188 0.018 0.018 Method B and Aged These results show that a hydrotalcite-like material of grain size less than 110 Angstroms has a faster rate of colorant absorption than a hydrotalcite-like material of grain size 250 Angstroms. Example VIII The colorant binding capacity of a Mg/Al hydrotalcite-like material according to the invention and prepared as in method A above was compared to that of a Mg/Al hydrotalcite-like material prepared as in method B above excepting that the solution was aged by heating at 90°C to 100°C for 2 hours before being filtered. Colorant binding capacities were measured by adding 200ml of a solution of O.lg of dyestuff in 1 litre of water to a flask containing 1 litre of water. 0.06g of the hydrotalcite sample was then added to the flask which was shaken vigorously for 2 minutes and left to stand for 2 hours with shaking every 15 minutes. The solution was then filtered and its absorbancy measured (as described in Example V) and compared to an identical solution with hydrotalcite omitted. The binding capacity was then calculated from the difference between these absorbancies and expressed as a percentage weight for weight. Binding Capacity % w/w Dyestuff max Mg/Al Mg/Al n Hydrotalcite Hydrotalcite method A method B Grain size 53 and Aged. Grain size 25θA Procion Turqoise HA 670 22 12 ex ICI Neutrichrome Navy 580 20 S-B ex ICI Levafix Brilliant 535 17 Red E-4BA ex Bayer Irqalan Grey BRL 570 15 200% ex Ciba-Geigy Acidol Black M-SRL 575 24 12 ex BASF These results show that a hydrotalcite-like material of grain size less than 110 Angstroms according to the invention has a greater dye binding capacity than a hydrotalcite-like material of grain size 250 Angstroms. The finer grain size materials prepared by methods A and B and Examples V to VIII inclusive provide efficient absorption when deposited in situ on a matrix material. Example IX This and the following examples illustrate the formation in situ of hydrotalcite in the channels or pores of porous materials. Two solutions were made up: Solution 1 88.2g MgS0 4 7H 2 0 39.4g A1 2 (S0 4 ) 3 16H 2 0 200g water Solution 2 30g NaOH 26.5g Na 2 C0 3 200g water Into solution 1 a cordierite monolith, ex Corning Keramik (material 9475, Product code 831615) , cut down to 2cm height and 1cm diameter, was immersed for 10 sees, then removed and surplus solution allowed to drain. Whilst still wet, it was then immersed into solution 2, for 10 sees, removed, washed with water and oven dried (120°C) . 0.053g HT was deposited on the monolith. The rate of colorant uptake was measured by holding the monolith in the centre of a 10cm length of plastic tubing of a suitable size to prevent dye solution passing around the outside of it. The bottom of the tube was constricted so that when the dye solution was circulating there was a head of solution maintained above the monolith. 75.7g of Direct Red 80 dye solution (from the standard kinetics test described on page 14) was recirculated at 25°C through the coated monolith. This proportion of HT:dye was the same as that in the kinetics test used for the other examples. After 5 minutes circulation a sample of solution was taken and analysed. The absorbance ratio after t=5 mins was 0.130 This example shows that HT can be coated in situ onto the walls of a monolith, and used to remove colour from a solution flowing through the monolith. Example X 9.5g of oven dried (120°C) sulphonated polystyrene microporous material (prepared using the procedure in Example 11 of EPA 0105634) was placed in a 500ml beaker 3 to act as matrix. 100cm of a solution containing lllg magnesium sulphate (MgSO. 7H„0) , 47g Aluminium sulphate (Al_(SO ) 16H O) and 300g water, was added dropwise evenly over the microporous material. Next 100cm of a solution containing 45g sodium hydroxide (NaOH) , 40g sodium carbonate (Na_CO_) and 300g water was added in the same manner. The sorptive capacity of the microporous material is such that there was no excess aqueous phase, i.e. the precipitation occurred within the pores of the microporous material. The coated microporous material was washed, by adding 2dm 3 water and filtering, then oven dried (120°C) . The dry product weighed 18.8g. The dye uptake kinetics were measured on a weight of HT basis, and compared with solid hydrotalcite of the same size (300μm - Malvern) made as previous Method A. t=20sec t=40sec t=lmin t=2min t=5min HT/matrix 0.592 0.537 0.396 0.305 0.047 HT 0.893 0.861 0.853 0.804 0.772 This example shows that a hydrotalcite formed in situ in the pores of a microporous material is capable of removing suspended dye at a faster rate than a HT prepared by a similar method but in the absence of a microporous material. Example XI Neosyl ET/Hydrotalcite composites were prepared as follows. Two standard solutions were prepared:- _3 1. 2 mol dm metals solution 2. 5 mol dm -3 alkali solution 75% NaOH 25% a 2 C0 3 About 10 Litre of each solution was prepared. Standard preparation used was:- i. 1 litre demineralised water was charged into a 5 litre beaker. ii. The two standard solutions of metal salts and alkali are added to this simultaneously from two separate dropping funnels. The pH is maintained at 10.5 - 11.0 by adjusting the relative addition rates of these two solutions. iii. Exactly one litre of metals solution added. This required just over 1 litre of alkali to maintain pH as above. This volume of metals solution precipitates 150g of HT. iv. Total time for the addition was 45 minutes. The solution was then further stirred for 15 minutes to ensure complete reaction. v. The resulting slurry was filtered, washed with 10 litres of demin water and dried at 100°C an oven overnight. vi. The dried sample was then milled by hand in a mortar and pestle and sieved to give a fraction with a 53-75μm particle size. The above procedure was used to prepare a control material i.e. 100% Hydrotalcite. To prepare the composite materials, Neosyl ET (a precipitated silica ex- Crosfield, Warrington, England) was mixed with 2 litres of water as the initial charge in the 5 litre beaker and then the metal salt and alkali solutions were added to this as for the control preparation described above. (The additional litre of water in the 5 litre beaker in the initial charge is to ensure good dispersion of the silica during the hydrotalcite precipitation and thence product homogeneity) . % by weight in final composite silica HT 0 100 90 10 80 20 70 30 60 40 50 50 All samples were dried in oven an at 100°C overnight. All were milled in a mortar and pestle and sieved to give a 53-75μm fraction. The rate of colorant absorption and the colorant binding capacities of the above materials were obtained using the previously described standard test methods on page 14 and 17 respectively. All rate of colorant absorption data is presented as absorbance ratios i.e. Absorbance ratio = Absorbance at time t Initial absorbance Rate of colorant absorption (using Direct Red 80) Time 30 60 90 120 sees sees sees sees Pure 100% HT 0.810 0.770 0.738 0.690 90:10 composite 0.980 0.853 0.825 0.801 80:20 composite 0.349 0.315 0.207 0.187 70:30 composite 0.311 0.216 0.137 0.104 60:40 composite 0.382 0.220 0.166 0.104 50:50 composite 0.373 0.224 0.166 0.128 With the exception of the 90:10 composite all others show faster kinetics than the 100% HT sample, despite having significantly less HT in the composite. This illustrates how more efficient use is made of the sorbent when it is formed as a composite with silica. Example XII Hydrotalcite/zeolite composites were prepared as follows. Two zeolite composites consisting of 50% HT:50% zeolite (by weight) were prepared using the method of Example XI. The zeolites used as matrix were sodium Y and zeolite 4A, respectively, obtainable from Crosfield, Warrington, England. Colorant binding capacities (using Procion Turquoise HA, obtainable from ICI, England) were as follows: % dye bound by weight 100% pure HT 3.64 HT/NaY composite 4.65 HT/4A composite 10.8 Rates of colorant absorption were as follows: Time 30 60 90 120 sees sees sees sees Pure 100% HT 0.810 0.770 0.738 0.690 HT/NaY composite 0.893 0.924 0.924 0.917 HT/4A composite 0.520 0.385 0.309 0.266

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method of preparing a composite material in which a hydrotalcite-like material is provided with improved absorption properties, by forming the hydrotalcite-like material in an aqueous medium in the presence of a matrix material on which it is deposited. 2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the matrix is capable of providing a function complementary to the absorption properties of the hydrotalcite-like material. 3. A composite material comprising a hydrotalcite-like material formed in situ and deposited on a matrix material. 4. A composite material according to claim 3 wherein the hydrotalcite-like material is present in a weight ratio of 10:90 to 90:10 with respect to the matrix material.

Inventors: COCKETT KEITH ROBERT FRASER, CONCANNON MARTIN, WEBB MAURICE, COCKETT, KEITH, ROBERT, FRASER, CONCANNON, MARTIN, WEBB, MAURICE
Applicants: CROSFIELD JOSEPH & SONS, JOSEPH CROSFIELD & SONS LIMITED
Application year: 1992
Main classification: B01J20
IPC codes: B01J20