Use of a modified sepiolite for caphering basic nitrogen in FCC catalysts

Abstract: Material used as matrix and active in catalysts for the catalytic cracking of heavy fractions of petroleum (FCC), consisting in a fibrous magnesian silicate of the sepiolite type modified by substitution of Mg₂+ terminal by trivalent cations and which is active and selective for bottom conversion and for passivation of basic compounds of nitrogen present in food products.

Description: During the catalytic cracking process (FCC) an attempt is made to avoid the harmful effect that several compounds, such as azotic compounds and metals, especially vanadium, which are contained in the feedstock, exert on the catalyst. All along the process of reactions that take place in the riser, these compounds are deposited on the catalyst that becomes either reversibly or irreversibly, poisoned through their action over its most active ingredient, zeolite, while the active centres or their structure are respectively poisoned or destroyed. There are two possible solutions to avoid this danger. The first one consists in a hydro-treatment of the power supply to the FCC, This solution, although quite effective, is very seldom put into practice due to its high price. The second alternative entails the incorporation of additives into the catalyst as components ready to be sacrificed while strongly interacting with the poisons. In the case of poisoning through azotic compounds present in the feedstock, these are very actively adsorbed, if they are of a basic character, on the acid centres of zeolite, making the catalyst activity rapidly diminish; this effect is much more notorious in catalysts containing highly stable zeolite of a low cell unit (A. Corma, V. Fornes, J.B. Montón and A.V. Orchillés, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 882 (1987); Scherzer and O.P. McArthur, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 27 , 1571 (1988). The harmful effect of the basic azotic compounds may be reduced by the use of active matrices of aluminum or silica-aluminum which, apart from providing an additional activity to that of zeolite, have also the ability to capture the nitrogen compounds (L.D. Silverman, S. Winkler, J.A. Tiethof and A. Witoshkin MA-86-62 NPRA Annual Meeting march 23-25 (1986); J.E. Otterstedt, S.B. Gevert, S. Järas and P.G. Menon, Appl. Catal. 22 (1986); J.E. Otterstedt, Y.M. Zhu and J. Sterte, Appl. Catal. 38, 143 (1988); B.K. Speronello and G.W. Young, Oil & Gas J. 82, 139 (1984). A new material derived from sepiolite has recently been presented. It possesses acid properties and may be used as an active component of a FCC catalyst (A. Corma, V. Fornés, A Mifsud and J. Pérez Pariente, Clay Minerals 19, 673, (1984) ibid ACS Symp. Ser. 452 (Fluid Catalytic Cracking II), 293 (1990). The present invention shows how an aluminium sepiolite of the type described in the two above-mentioned works, can be used as a matrix component for the purpose of passivating the nitrogeneous compounds responsible for the poisoning of zeolite, and may favourably compete with the more effective materials used so far, such as silica-alumina. The invention as claimed refers to the use in a FCC catalyst of a modified sepiolite in which Mg 2+ cations have been replaced by trivalent Al following the above-described procedure (ES-patent 527.756 (1983)), for capturing basic nitrogen. This sepiolite presents a high quantity of Lewis acid centres of a mean potency which are capable of producing a strong interactivity with azotic basic compounds as shown by the pyridine strip adsorbed on the Brönsted (1545 cm -1 ) and Lewis centres (1455 cm -1 ) from a sample where Al 3+ has been introduced. The formation of the FCC catalyst is carried out following procedures which are well known to the catalyst manufacturers, according to which the sepiolite interchanged with Al 3+ , is introduced in a percentage by weight fluctuating between 10 and 80% of that of the final catalyst, if incorporated in the same particles as zeolite had been. In the case of the introduction being made in particles other than those containing zeolite, the weight percentage would lie between 20 and 70%. In the first case, the rest of the catalyst is composed of a silica-colloidal or alumina (chlorhydrol) binder in a percentage of up to 10%; the zeolitic component goes in a 10-30% proportion, and the rest, up to 100%, is made of kaolin. In the second case, i.e., that in which sepiolite is incorporated to other particles than those containing zeolite, these are composed, apart from sepiolite (20-70%), by a binder of the same type as the above named (2-20%), while the rest, up to 100%, is made of kaolin. The following examples show the behaviour of a zeolitic-type catalytic cracking, which contains alumina sepiolite, for a vacuum gasoil cracking containing 5,000 ppm of basic nitrogen (quinoleine.) Its behaviour is compared to that of an equivalent catalyst which contains, as a difference, a commercially available silica-alumina (25% Al 2 O 3 ). EXAMPLES Example 1 A catalyst containing 20%, in terms of weight, of a highly stable zeolite with a cell unit of a 2,428 nm in size, and 80% of aluminum sepiolite prepared according to the reference (Sp. patent no. 527. 756 (1983), was used, after burning at 600º C, for cracking a vacuum gasoil with 20 pm nitrogen, in a fixed MAT type bed reactor. The reaction conditions were 482º C, with a catalyzer/feeding ratio of 1:1 g.g. -1 and a response time of 60 seconds. The total conversion obtained (diesel, plus gasoline, gases and cokes) rose to 69.1%. Diesel, gasoline, gases and coke yields were 19.6, 37.4, 10.0 and 2.1 % respectively. Under the same conditions, a catalyst prepared with the same proportions of the same zeolite but where sepiolite had been replaced by an amorphic silica-alumina commercially available (25% Al 2 O 3 ), rendered a 74% conversion, with 18.2, 39.2, 14.6 and 2.4% as respective yields for diesel, gasoline, gases and coke. Example 2 A vacuum gasoil catalyst cracking equivalent to example 1, with the addition of 5000 ppm of nitrogen (quinoleine), under the same experimental conditions over the two alumina sepiolite and silica-alumina catalysts described in example no. 1. The conversion of the sepiolite catalyst was 62.5% by weight and the yields in diesel, gasoline, gases and coke were 19.7, 35.3, 5.7 and 1.8% respectively. When the amorphic silica-alumina was used, the conversion was 64.0% in terms of weight and the yields amounted to 20.5, 34.0, 8.0 and 1.5%. Upon comparison of the results of examples 1 and 2, it was noted that a fresh sepiolite catalyst brought about a better passivation than the amorphic silica-alumina catalyst (also fresh) before a steam deactivation. Example 3 In order to simulate the conditions of a balance catalyst, the catalysts described in example no. 1 were treated at 750º C in the presence of steam (100%.) An experiment analogous to that of example 2 was carried out with the catalysts that had been deactivated with steam, the catalyst/feeding ratio being also 1.1. g. g. -1 in this case. The catalyst which contained aluminum sepiolite gave a conversion of 60.4% with diesel, gasoline, gas and coke yields of 18.8, 34.6, 5.3 and 1.6% respectively. The catalyst that contained silica-alumina, gave a conversion of 54.2%, with a product breakdown of 18.1, 30.8, 4.4 and 0.9%. Example 4 In this case a description was made of the results obtained with the same catalysts and under the same conditions as those of example 3, but with the introduction of 5,000 ppm of nitrogen (quinoleine) in the feedstock. With the sepiolite catalyst the conversion obtained was 41.6%. The diesel, gasoline, gas and coke yields were 18.7, 16.9, 3.2 and 2.8% respectively. When a silica-alumina catalyst was used, the total conversion in terms of weight was 37.8%, with yield values of 18.4, 14.6, 2.6 and 2,2%. Examples 3 and 4 show a stronger passivating effect of the basic nitrogen compounds on the part of aluminum sepiolite. Example 5 This example described the influence of the sepiolite contents over the passivating effect. A catalyst similar to that of example 1 was prepared for that purpose, with equal contents and the same type of zeolite but with 30% pf aluminum sepiolite, and kaolin as the remaining contents. The final catalyst was treated with water steam under the conditions of example 3. The response conditions and the composition of the feeding agents were the same as in example 4. The results obtained were the following: weight conversion 35.4% and diesel, gasoline, gas and coke yields, 18.3, 14.5, 1.6 and 0.8 %, respectively.

Claims: Use of a modified sepiolite consisting of a modified fibrous magnesium silicate wherein divalent Mg cations of the sepiolite are replaced by trivalent Al cations, and having a surface area of between 50 and 600 m 2 /g, a pore volume of between 0.10 and 1.5 ml/g and an average pore radius of between 20 and 110 Angstroms, for capturing basic nitrogen in FCC catalysts. The use according to claim 1, wherein the FCC catalyst comprises 10-80% by weight of a modified sepiolite consisting of a modified fibrous magnesium silicate wherein divalent Mg cations of the sepiolite are replaced by trivalent Al cations, and having a surface area of between 50 and 600 m 2 /g, a pore volume of between 0.10 and 1.5 ml/g and an average pore radius of between 20 and 110 Angstroms; for capturing basic nitrogen; a zeolite component comprising particles containing zeolite; up to 20% by weight of a binding material selected from colloidal silica or alumina; and the rest up to 100% by weight of kaolin. The use according to claim 2, wherein the modified sepiolite is incorporated in the particles containing zeolite, the catalyst comprising up to 10% by weight of said binding material, and 10-30% by weight of the zeolite component. The use according to claim 2, wherein the FCC catalyst comprises 20-70% by weight of the modified sepiolite not being incorporated into said particles containing zeolite, and 2-20% by weight of said binding material.

Inventors: CORMA CANOS AVELINO, MOCHOLI CASTELLO FRANCISCO AND, CORMA CANOS, AVELINO, MOCHOLI CASTELLO, FRANCISCO, ANDRES, CORMA CANOS, AVELINO INST. TECNOLOGIA QUIMICA DEL, MOCHOLI CASTELLO, Francisco, Andrés
Applicants: CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE, UNIV VALENCIA POLITECNICA, UNIVERSIDAD POLITECNICA DE VALENCIA
Application year: 1992
Main classification: C10G11
IPC codes: B01J29, C10G11, B01J21