Herbicidal composition

Abstract: There is disclosed a herbicidal composition comprising as active ingredients a herbicidally effective amount of (a) an iminothiazoline compound of the formula: wherein R¹ is halogen, halo(C₁-C₂)alkyl, halo(C₁-C₂)alkoxy or halo(C₁-C₂)alkylthio; R² is C₁-C₂ alkyl, chlorine, bromine or iodine; R³ is C₁-C₆ alkyl, C₃-C₆ cycloalkyl, C₃-C₆ cycloalkoxy or C₁-C₆ alkoxy, all of which are optionally substituted with at least one substituent selected from halogen, C₁-C₂ alkyl and C₁-C₂ alkoxy; R⁴ is hydrogen or halogen; and (b) at least one of herbicidal triazine compounds, herbicidal uracil compounds, herbicidal urea compounds, herbicidal dinitro aniline compounds, norflurazon, dimetazon, imazaquin and imazetapia. Also disclosed is a method for controlling undesired weeds by use of the herbicidal composition.

Description: The present invention relates to a herbicidal composition. More particularly, it relates to a herbicidal composition comprising an iminothiazoline compound and at least one of particular herbicidal compounds. A great number of chemical substances having a herbicidal activity have been used for herbicidal agents to exterminate or control the vegetation of undesired weeds in agricultural and non-agricultural fields. Examples are 2-(acylimino)thiazolidine derivatives disclosed in EP-A-0349282. However, there are many kinds of weeds and their growth extends over a long period of time, so that most of the conventional herbicidal agents have an effect only on the specific kinds of weeds. Accordingly, there is a great demand on herbicidal agents capable of exerting a strong herbicidal activity against a wide variety of weeds without any material phytotoxicity to crop plants. By the way, no-till cultivation has recently been developed for saving labor work, extending a cultivation period and preventing loss in weight of soil. For this reason, there also is a great demand on herbicidal agents capable of exerting a distinct herbicidal activity in foliar treatment, maintaining a prolonged herbicidal efficacy in soil treatment and showing a prominent selectivity between crop plants and weeds. Thus, it is the object of the present invention to provide compositions, comprising an iminothiazoline compound and a further herbicide exhibiting highly enhanced herbicidal activity against a wide variety of weeds in agricultural and non-agricultural fields. This object has been achieved by a herbicidal composition comprising as active ingredients a herbicidally effective amount of (a) an iminothiazoline compound of the formula: wherein R¹ is halogen, halo(C₁-C₂)alkyl, halo(C₁-C₂)alkoxy or halo(C₁-C₂)alkylthio; R² is C₁-C₂ alkyl, chlorine, bromine or iodine; R³ is C₁-C₆ alkyl, C₃-C₆ cycloalkyl, C₃-C₆ cycloalkoxy or C₁-C₆ alkoxy, all of which are optionally substituted with at least one substituent selected from halogen, C₁-C₂ alkyl and C₁-C₂ alkoxy; R⁴ is hydrogen or halogen (hereinafter referred to as compound (I)); and (b) at least one of herbicidal triazine compounds, herbicidal uracil compounds, herbicidal urea compounds, herbicidal dinitro aniline compounds, norflurazon, dimethazone, imazaquin and imazethapyr (hereinafter referred to as compound (II)). The herbicidal composition of the present invention is characterized by the combined use of compounds (I) and (II). In comparison with the separate use of each of these compounds, this combined use provides remarkable enhancement of the herbicidal potency, so that they may be used at a smaller dosage. Further, the weed-control spectrum is widely enlarged. Thus, a clear and definite herbicidal effect is observed in the combined use, and the herbicidal composition can be used with high safety for no-till cultivation of crop plants such as cotton, soybean, corn, wheat, barley and rice plant. The herbicidal composition of the present invention can exterminate or control a variety of weeds, of which examples are broad-leaved weeds such as common purslane ( Portulaca oleracea ), common chickweed ( Stellaria media ), common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album ), redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus ), radish ( Raphanus sativus ), wild mustard ( Sinapis arvensis ), shepherdspurse ( Capsella bursa-pastoris ), hemp sesbania ( Sesbania exaltata ), sicklepod ( Cassia obtusitolia ), velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti ), prickly sida ( Sida spinosa ), field pansy ( Viola arvensis ), catchweed bedstraw ( Galium aparine ), ivyleaf morningglory ( Ipomoea hederacea ), tall morningglory ( Ipomoea purpurea ), field bindweed ( Convolvulus arvensis ), purple deadnettle ( Lamium purpureum ), henbit ( Lamium amplexicaure ), jimsonweed ( Datura stramonium ), black nightshade ( Solanum nigrum ), persian speedwell ( Veronica persica ), common cooklebur ( Xanthium pensylvanicum ), common sunflower ( Helianthus annuus ), scentless chamomile ( Matricaria perforata ) and corn marigold ( Chrysanthemum segetum ). Examples of Graminaceous weeds include Japanese millet ( Echinochloa frumentacea ), barnyardgrass ( Echinochloa crus-galli ), green foxtail ( Setaria viridis ), yellow foxtail ( Setaria glauca ), southern crabgrass ( Digitaria ciliaris ), large crabgrass ( Digitalia sanguinalis ), annual bluegrass ( Poa annua ), blackgrass ( Alopecurus myosuroides ), oats ( Avena sativa ), wild oats ( Avena fatua ), johnsongrass ( Sorghum halepense ), quackgrass ( Agropyron repens ), downy brome ( Bromus tectorum ), giant foxtail ( Setaria faberi ), fall panicum ( Panicum dichotomiflorum ), shattercane ( Sorghum bicolor ) and bermudagrass ( Cynodon dactylon ). It should be noted that the herbicidal compositions of the present invention have the advantage of exhibiting no material chemical injury to various agricultural crops such as corn, wheat, barley, soybean, cotton and rice plant (particularly, to cotton, soybean, corn, wheat and barley when compound (II) is a triazine compound or urea compound; to cotton or soybean when compound (II) is norflurazon, dimethazone, imazaquin or imazethapyr; and to cotton, rice plants or soybean when compound (II) is a dinitro aniline compound). The compound (I) can be produced according to the process as described in EP-A-0446802. Examples of compound (II) are described by Imamura et al., "Short Review of Herbicides and PGRs 1991", 188-211, 174, 268, 170, 172, 180-183 and 54-91 (1990), such as atrazine, cyanazine, prometryn, metribuzin, simazine, simetryne, ametryne, metamitron (preferably atrazine, cyanazine, prometryn, metribuzin) as triazine compounds; isoprocil, bromacil, lenacil as an uracil compound; fenuron, monuron, monolinuron, buturon, diuron, linuron, metoxuron, chlortoluron, isoproturon, fluometuron as urea compounds; trifluralin, benefin, pendimethalin, oryzalin, ethalfluralin, prodiamine as dinitro aniline compounds; norflurazon, dimethazone, imazaquin and imazethapyr. However, the combined use of compounds (I) and (II) has never been attempted. Among various kinds of compound (I), preferred are those wherein R¹ is halo(C₁-C₂)alkyl, those wherein R² is C₁-C₂ alkyl, those wherein R³ is C₁-C₆ alkoxy, C₁-C₆ alkyl or halo(C₁-C₆)alkyl, more preferably (C₁-C₆)alkyl substituted with fluorine, more preferably methyl substituted with fluorine and those wherein R⁴ is hydrogen or fluorine at the para position. The proportion of compounds (I) and (II) as the active ingredients in the herbicidal composition of the present invention may vary within a considerable broad range. In general, however, herbicidal triazine compounds as compound (II) can be used in an amount of 0.1 to 100 parts by weight, preferably of 0.2 to 50 parts by weight, more preferably of 0.5 to 30 parts by weight; norflurazon, dimethazone, imazaquin or imazethapyr as compound (II) can be used in an amount of 0.1 to 100 parts by weight, preferably of 0.2 to 50 parts by weight, more preferably of 0.3 to 30 parts by weight; herbicidal uracil compounds as compound (II) can be used in an amount of 0.5 to 100 parts by weight, preferably of 0.8 to 30 parts by weight, more preferably of 1 to 20 parts by weight; herbicidal urea compounds as compound (II) can be used in an amount of 0.1 to 100 parts by weight, preferably of 0.5 to 50 parts by weight, more preferably of 0.8 to 30 parts by weight; herbicidal dinitro aniline compounds as compound (II) can be used in an amount of 0.5 to 100 parts by weight, preferably of 0.8 to 50 parts by weight, more preferably of 1 to 30 parts by weight, all to one part by weight of compound (I). For the practical usage of the herbicidal composition of the present invention, it is usually formulated with conventional solid or liquid carriers or diluents as well as surface active agents, or other auxiliary agents into conventional formulations such as emulsifiable concentrates, wettable powders, suspensions, flowables, granules and water-dispersible granules. These formulations contain the active ingredients at a total content of from 0.5% to 90% by weight, preferably from 1% to 80% by weight. Examples of the solid carrier or diluent are fine powders or granules of kaolin clay, attapulgite clay, bentonite, terra alba, pyrophyllite, talc, diatomaceous earth, calcite, walnut shell powders, urea, ammonium sulfate and synthetic hydrous silica. As the liquid carrier or diluent, there may be exemplified aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g., xylene, methylnaphthalene), alcohols (e.g., isopropanol, ethylene glycol, ethoxyethanol), ketones (e.g., acetone, cyclohexanone, isophorone), vegetable oil, (e.g., soybean oil, cotton seed oil), dimethylsulfoxide, N,N-dimethylformamide, acetonitrile and water. The surface active agent used for emulsification, dispersing or spreading may be of any type, for instance, either anionic or non-ionic. Examples of the surface active agent include alkylsulfates, alkylsulfonates, alkylarylsulfonates, dialkylsulfosuccinates, phosphates of polyoxyethylenealkykaryl ethers, polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers, polyoxyethylene alkylaryl ethers, polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene block copolymers, sorbitan fatty acid esters and polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid esters. Examples of the auxiliary agent include ligninsulfonates, sodium alginate, polyvinyl alcohol, gum arabic, CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose) and PAP (isopropyl phosphonic acid). The herbicidal composition thus formulated in any suitable formulation is useful for pre-emergence or post-emergence control of undesired weeds by soil or foliar treatment. These treatments include application to the soil surface prior to or after planting, incorporation into the soil prior to planting or transplanting, and the like. The foliar treatment may be effected by spraying the herbicidal composition over the top of plants. It may also be applied directly to the weeds if care must be taken to keep the chemical off the crop foliage. The dosage of the active ingredients may vary depending on the active ingredient species, mixing ratio, formulation used, prevailing weather conditions, prevailing season, mode of application, soil involved, crop and weed species, and the like. Usually, however, the total dosage of the active ingredients is (a) from 100 to 4000 grams, preferably from 150 to 3000 grams, more preferably from 200 to 2000 grams per hectare, when herbicidal triazine compounds, urea compounds and dinitro aniline compounds are used; (b) from 100 to 20,000 grams, preferably from 150-5000 grams, more preferably 200-2000 grams per hectare, when herbicidal uracil compounds are used; and (c) from 50 to 3000 grams, preferably 100 to 2500 grams, more preferably 150 to 2000 grams per hectare, when norflurazon, dimethazone, imazaquin and imazethapyr are used. The herbicidal composition formulated in the form of an emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, suspensions, flowable or water-dispersible granules may usually be employed by diluting it with water at a volume of 100 to 1000 liters per hectare, if necessary, with addition of an auxiliary agent such as a spreading agent. The herbicidal composition formulated in the form of granules may usually be applied as such without dilution. Examples of the spreading agent include, in addition to the surface active agents as noted above, polyoxyethylene resin acid (ester), ligninsulfonate, abietinic acid salts, dinaphthylmethandisulfonate and paraffin. The herbicidal composition of the present invention is useful as a herbicide to be employed for paddy field, crop field, orchards, pasture land, lawns, forests and non-agricultural fields. Furthermore, it may be applied in combination with e.g. insecticides, acaricides, nematocides fungicides, other herbicides, plant growth regulators, fertilizers and soil improvers. The present invention will be explained in more detail by way of Reference Examples, Formulation Examples and Test Examples, to which however the invention is not limited in any way. Practical embodiments for production of compound (I) are illustrated in the following examples. Reference Preparation Example 1 To 2-imino-3-[(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-5-methylthiazoline hydrochloride (7.2 g) in ethyl acetate (100 ml), added were triethylamine (7.4 g) and trifluoroacetic acid anhydride (5.2 g) with stirring at room temperature, and stirring was continued for 3 hours. The residue was washed with water (50 ml) and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to give a crystalline residue which was recrystallized from isopropanol to afford 2-[(trifluoroacetyl)imino]-3-[(3-trifloromethyl)phenyl]-5-methylthiazoline (Compound No. 46) (7.5 g). m.p., 128.1°C. Reference Preparation Example 2 A mixture of 2-imino-3-[(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-5-methylthiazoline hydrochloride (0.42 g), triethylamine (2.2 g), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (0.8 g) and difluoroacetic acid (0.75 g) in chloroform (10 ml) was refluxed for 8 hours. After cooling, the residue was washed with aqueous hydrochloric acid and aqueous potassium carbonate, and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was subjected to column chromatography to give 2-[(difluoroacetyl)imino]-3-[(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-5-methylthiazoline (Compound No. 55) (0.3 g). m.p., 117.9°C. Reference Preparation Example 3 A solution of 2-[(ethoxycarbonyl)imino]-3-[(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thiazoline (0.5 g) and N-iodosuccinimide (0.4 g) in chloroform (30 ml) was refluxed for 20 hours. After cooling, the reaction mixture was washed with an aqueous sodium sulfite solution and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was subjected to column chromatography to give 0.1 g of 2-[(ethoxycarbonyl)imino]-3-[(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-5-iodothiazoline (Compound No. 38). In the same manner as above, various kinds of compounds (I) as shown in Table 1 were obtained. Practical embodiments for preparation of the composition are illustrated in the following Formulation Examples wherein parts are by weight. Formulation Example 1 Eight parts of compound (I), 40 parts of prometryn, atrazine, dimethazone, imazethapyr, diuron, fenuron, linuron, chlortoluron, trifluralin, benefin or prodiamine, 3 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 2 parts of sodium laurylsulfate and 47 parts of synthetic hydrated silica are well mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder. Formulation Example 2 Twelve parts of compound (I), 12 parts of metribuzin or bromacil, 3 parts of polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, 3 parts of CMC and 70 parts of water are mixed and pulverized until the particle size becomes less than 5 microns to obtain a suspension. Formulation Example 3 Three tenths parts of compound (I), 9 parts of cyanazine, norflurazon, isoproturon, trifluralin or pendimethalin, 2 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 1 part of synthetic hydrated silica and 30 parts of bentonite and 57.7 parts of kaolin clay are well mixed while being powdered. The mixture is then kneaded with water, granulated and dried to obtain granules. Formulation Example 4 Thirty four parts of compound (I), 17 parts of metribuzin, 3 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 2 parts of sodium laurylsulfate and 44 parts of synthetic hydrated silica are well mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder. Formulation Example 5 One and a half parts of compound (I), 45 parts of prometryn or bromacil, 3 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 2 parts of sodium laurylsulfate and 48.5 parts of synthetic hydrated silica are well mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder. Formulation Example 6 Twenty parts of compound (I), 6 parts of imazaquin, 3 parts of polyoxyethlene sorbitan monooleate, 3 parts of CMC and 68 parts of water are mixed and pulverized until the particle size becomes less than 5 microns to obtain a suspension. Formulation Example 7 Fourty parts of compound (I), 8 parts of imazethapyr, 3 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 2 parts of sodium laurylsulfate and 47 parts of synthetic hydrated silica are well mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder. Formulation Example 8 Six parts of compound (I), 30 parts of norflurazon, 2 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 1 part of synthetic hydrated silica and 30 parts of bentonite and 31 parts of kaolin clay are well mixed while being powdered. The mixture is then kneaded with water, granulated and dried to obtain granules. Formulation Example 9 One part of compound (I), 50 parts of norflurazon, fluometuron or trifluralin, 3 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 2 parts of sodium laurylsulfate and 44 parts of synthetic hydrated silica are well mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder. Formulation Example 10 Seven parts of compound (I), 42 parts of bromacil, 3 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 2 parts of sodium laurylsulfate and 46 parts of synthetic hydrated silica are well mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder. Formulation Example 11 A half part of compound (I), 10 parts of bromacil, 2 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 1 part of synthetic hydrated silica and 30 parts of bentonite and 56.5 parts of kaolin clay are mixed well while being powdered. The mixture is then kneaded with water, granulated and dried to obtain granules. Formulation Example 12 Twenty five parts of compound (I), 20 parts of lenacil, trifluralin, 3 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 2 parts of sodium laurysulfate and 50 parts of synthetic hydrated silica are well mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder. Formulation Example 13 One part of compound (I), 30 parts of isoprocil, 3 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 2 parts of sodium laurylsulfate and 64 parts of synthetic hydrated silica are well mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder. Formulation Example 14 Fifteen parts of compound (I), 12 parts of fluometuron, 3 parts of polyoxyetylene sorbitan monooleate, 3 parts of CMC and 67 parts of water are mixed and pulverized until the particle size becomes less than 5 microns to obtain a suspension. Formulation Example 15 Thirty parts of compound (I), 15 parts of diuron, 3 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 2 parts of sodium laurylsulfate and 50 parts of synthetic hydrated silica are well mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder. Formulation Example 16 Eight parts of compound (I), 20 parts of trifluralin, oryzalin or ethalfluralin, 3 parts of polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, 3 parts of CMC and 66 parts of water are mixed and pulverized until the particle size becomes less than 5 microns to obtain a suspension. Formulation Example 17 Fourteen parts of compound (I), 14 parts of trifluralin, 3 parts of calcium ligninsulfonate, 2 parts of sodium laurylsulfate and 47 parts of synthetic hydrated silica are well mixed while being powdered to obtain a wettable powder. The practical herbicidal activity of the composition of the invention will be explained in further detail with reference to the following Test Examples wherein the growth controlling percentage (%) was determined by weighing the aerial parts of the test plants (fresh weight) and making calculation according to the following equation: Test Example 1 Vats (33 cm X 23 cm X 11 cm) were filled with upland field soil, and the seeds of the test plants (except for cotton) were sowed therein in 1 to 2 cm depth. A designated amount of the test composition formulated in an wettable powder as in Formulation Example 1 was diluted with a water, and the dilution was sprayed onto the soil surface by means of an automatic sprayer at a spray volume of 1000 liters per hectare. Thereafter, the soil surface (to 4 cm depth) was well mixed and the seeds of cotton were sowed in 2 cm depth. The test plants were grown in a green house for 28 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 2. Test Example 2 Concrete containers (40 cm X 35 cm) were filled with upland field soil, and the seeds of the test plants were sowed therein in 1 to 3 cm depth. A designated amount of the test composition formulated in an wettable powder as in Formulation Example 1 was diluted with water, and the dilution was sprayed onto the soil surface by means of a small hand sprayer at a spray volume of 430 liters per hectare. The test plants treated with the test compositions as described above were grown outdoors for 52 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 3. Test Example 3 The test plants in Table 4, which had been treated with the test compositions in Table 4 in the same manner as in Test Example 2, were grown outdoors for 29 days, and herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 4. Test Example 4 Sandy plowed fields were turned up and, after border building, plotted into blocks of 3 m² (1 X 3 m) each. Seeds of the test plants in Table 5 were sowed therein in 4 to 5 cm depth. A designated amount of the test composition formulated in an wettable powder as in Formulation Example 1 was diluted with water, and the dilution was sprayed onto the soil surface by means of a small hand sprayer at a spray volume of 236 liters per hectare. Thereafter, the test plants were grown outdoors for 51 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 5. Test compound Active ingredien dosage (g/ha) Mixing ratio Phytotoxicity Herbicidal activity Corn Johnsongrass Giant foxtail Slender amaranth Cyanazine 500 - none 20 13 13 1000 - none 60 27 15 2000 - none 67 73 40 Compound No.4 + Cyanazine 200 + 500 1:2.5 none 100 100 100 200 + 1000 1:5 none 100 100 100 Test Example 5 Sandy plowed fields were turned up and, after border building, plotted into blocks of 3 m² (1 X 3m) each. Seeds of the test plants in Table 6 were sowed therein in 1 to 7 cm depth. A designated amount or the test composition formulated in an wettable powder as in Formulation Example 1 was diluted with water, and the dilution was sprayed onto the soil surface by means of a small hand sprayer at a spray volume of 236 liters per hectare. Thereafter, the test plants were grown outdoors for 44 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 6. Test compound Active ingredien dosage (g/ha) Mixing ratio Phytotoxicity Herbicidal activity Soybean Velvetleaf Slender amaranth Pale smartweed Metribuzin 250 - none 87 7 77 500 - none 100 30 92 Compound No.4 + Metribuzin 100 + 250 1:2.5 none 100 95 100 200 + 250 1:1.25 none 100 95 100 Test Example 6 Sandy plowed fields were turned up and, after border building, plotted into blocks of 3 m² (1 X 3 m) each. Seeds of the test plants in Table 7 (except for cotton) were sowed therein in 1 to 7 cm depth. A designated amount of the test composition formulated in a wettable powder as in Formulation Example 1 was diluted with water, and the dilution was sprayed onto the soil surface by means of a small hand sprayer at a spray volume of 236 liters per hectare. Thereafter, the soil surface (to 7-8 cm depth) was well mixed and the seeds of cotton were sowed therein in 5 to 7 cm depth, the test plants were grown outdoors for 27 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 7. Test compound Active ingredien dosage (g/ha) Mixing ratio Phytotoxicity Herbicidal activity Cotton Goosegrass Southern crabgrass Prickly sida Common purslane Prometryn 500 - none 0 0 20 0 1000 - none 0 13 20 30 Compound No.46 + Prometryn 100 + 500 1:5 none 83 100 100 100 Test Example 7 Sandy plowed fields were turned up and, after border building, plotted into blocks of 3 m² (1 X 3 m) each. Seeds of the test plants in Table 8 (except for cotton) were sowed therein in 1 to 7 cm depth. A designated amount of the test composition formulated in an wettable powder as in Formulation Example 1 was diluted with water containing a spreading agent, and the dilution gas sprayed onto the soil surface by means of a small hand sprayer at a spray volume of 236 liters per hectare. Thereafter, the soil surface (to 7-8 cm depth) was well mixed and the seeds of cotton were sowed therein in 5 to 7 cm depth, the test plants were grown outdoors for 27 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 8. Test compound Active ingredien dosage (g/ha) Mixing ratio Phytotoxicity Herbicidal activity Cotton Slender amaranth Prickly sida Common purslane Sicklepod Norflurazon 750 - none 17 58 33 13 1500 - none 23 92 90 67 Compound No.4 + Norflurazon 200 + 750 1:3.75 none 100 100 100 100 Compound No.46 + Norflurazon 100 + 750 1:7.5 none 100 100 100 100 Compound No.55 + Norflurazon 100 + 750 1:7.5 none 100 100 100 100 Test Example 8 The test plants in Table 9 were treated with the test compositions in Table 9 and grown in the same manner as in Test Example 2. The herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 9. Test compound Active ingredient dosage (g/ha) Mixing ratio Phytotoxicity Herbicidal activity Soybean Quackgrass Johnsongrass Southern crabgrass Slender amaranth Dimethazone 400 - none 10 60 50 40 800 - none 80 90 50 75 Compound No.4 + Dimethazone 200 + 400 1:2 none 100 100 100 100 Test Example 9 Sandy plowed fields were turned up and, after border building, plotted into blocks of 3 m² (1 X 3 m) each. Seeds of the test plants in Table 10 were sowed therein in 4 to 8 cm depth. A designated amount of the test composition formulated in an wettable powder as in Formulation Example 1 was diluted with water, and the dilution was sprayed onto the soil surface by means of a small hand sprayer at a spray volume of 236 liters per hectare. Thereafter, the test plants were grown outdoors for 44 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 10. Test compound Active ingredient dosage (g/ha) Mixing ratio Phytotoxicity Herbicidal activity Soybean Giant foxtail Southern crabgrass Morningglories Jimsonweed Imazaquin 70 - none 50 7 50 40 140 - none 68 43 67 67 280 - none 85 52 82 82 Compound No.4 + Imazaquin 100 + 70 1:0.7 none 100 100 100 100 100 + 140 1:1.4 none 100 100 100 100 Test Example 10 Sandy plowed fields were turned up and, after border building, plotted into blocks of 3 m² (1 X 3 m) each. Seeds of the test plants in Table 11 were sowed therein and cultivated outdoors for 41 days. A designated amount of the test composition formulated in a wettable powder as in Formulation Example 1 was diluted with water containing a spreading agent, and the dilution was sprayed over the foliage of the test plants by means of a small hand sprayer at a spray volume of 236 liters per hectare. At the time of the treatment, the test plants had 9-24 cm in height and 3.5-8 leaves. Thereafter, the test plants were grown outdoors for 43 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 11. Test Example 11 Concrete containers (40 cm X 35 cm) were filled with upland field soil, and the seeds of the test plants in Table 12 were sowed therein in 1 to 3 cm depth. A designated amount of the test composition formulated in an wettable powder as in Formulation Example 1 was diluted with water, and the dilution was sprayed onto the soil surface by means of a small hand sprayer at a spray volume of 658 liters per hectare. The test plants treated with the test compositions as described above were grown outdoors for 30 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 12. Test Example 12 Concrete containers (40 cm X 35 cm) were filled with upland field soil, and the seeds of the test plants in Table 13 were sowed therein, and cultivated outdoors for 29 days. A designated amount of the test composition formulated in an wettable powder as in Formulation Example 1 was diluted with water containing a spreading agent, and the dilution was sprayed over the foliage of the test plants by means of a small hand sprayer at a spray volume of 658 liters per hectare. At the time of the treatment, the test plants had 1-3 cm in height and 1-2 leaves. Thereafter, the test plants were grown outdoors for 39 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 13. Test compound Active ingredient dosage (g/ha) Mixing ratio Herbicidal activity Ladysthumb Common chickweed Field pansy Purple deadnettle Catchweed bedstraw Persian speedwell Isoproturon 500 - 60 50 10 0 0 0 1000 - 100 100 25 15 0 0 Compound No.4 + Isoproturon 63 + 500 1:8 100 100 90 80 80 100 Compound No.46 + Isoproturon 63 + 500 1:8 100 100 100 100 90 100 Test Example 13 The test plants in Table 14 were treated with the test compositions in Table 14 and grown in the same manner as in Test Example 10. The herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 14. Test compound Active ingredient dosage (g/ha) Mixing ratio Herbicidal activity Persian speedwell Lambsquarters Slender amaranth Ladysthumb Common chickweed Diuron 1200 - 23 85 83 40 10 2400 - 48 87 97 78 93 Compound No.46 + Diuron 100 + 1200 1:12 100 100 100 100 100 200 + 1200 1:6 100 100 100 100 100 Test Example 14 The test plants in Table 15, which had been treated with the test compositions in Table 15 in the same manner as in Test Example 5, were grown outdoors for 27 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 15. Test Example 15 The test plants in Table 16, which had been treated with the test compositions in Table 16 in the same manner as in Test Example 5, were grown outdoors for 35 days, and the herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 16. Test compound Active ingredient dosage (g/ha) Mixing ratio Herbicidal activity Downy brome Catchweed bedstraw Persian speedwell Field pansy Common chickweed Isoproturon 1000 - 55 0 27 0 47 2000 - 62 0 50 0 87 Compound No.4 + Isoproturon 125 + 1000 1:8 90 100 100 100 97 Test Example 16 The test plants in Table 17 were treated with the test compositions in Table 17 and grown in the same manner as in Test Example 6. The herbicidal activity and phytotoxicity were examined. The results are shown in Table 17. The biological data of Compound (I) as a herbicide will be illustrated in the following Reference Test Example wherein the phytotoxicity to crop plants and the herbicidal activity on weeds were determined by visual observation as to the degree of germination as well as the growth inhibition and rated with an index 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10, the numeral "0" indicating no material difference as seen in comparison with the untreated plants and the numeral "10" indicating the complete inhibition or death of the test plants. The compound number in the biological data corresponds to that shown in Table 1. Reference Test Example 1 Cylindrical plastic pots (diameter, 10 cm; height, 10 cm) were filled with upland field soil, and the seeds of japanese millet, tall morningglory and velvetleaf were sowed therein and covered with soil. A designated amount of the test compound formulated in an emulsifiable concentrate, which was obtained by well mixing of 5 parts of compound (I), 15 parts of "Toxanone P8L" (a commercial surface active agent; Sanyo Kasei K.K.) and 80 parts of cyclohexanone, was diluted with water, and the dilution was sprayed onto the soil surface by means of a small hand sprayer at a spray volume of 1000 liters per hectare. The test plants were grown in a greenhouse for 20 days, and the herbicidal activity was examined. The results are shown in Table 18.

Claims: A herbicidal composition comprising as active ingredients a herbicidally effective amount of: (a) an iminothiazoline compound of the formula: wherein R¹ is halogen, halo(C₁-C₂)alkyl, halo(C₁-C₂)alkoxy or halo(C₁-C₂)alkylthio; R² is C₁-C₂ alkyl, chlorine, bromine or iodine; R³ is C₁-C₆ alkyl, C₃-C₆ cycloalkyl, C₃-C₆ cycloalkoxy or C₁-C₆ alkoxy, all of which are optionally substituted with at least one substituent selected from halogen, C₁-C₂ alkyl and C₁-C₂ alkoxy; R⁴ is hydrogen or halogen; and (b) at least one of herbicidal triazine compounds, herbicidal uracil compounds, herbicidal urea compounds, herbicidal dinitro aniline compounds, norflurazon, dimethazone, imazaquin and imazethapyr. A composition according to claim 1, wherein said ingredient (b) is selected from the herbicidal triazine compounds. A composition according to claim 2, wherein said ingredient (b) is at least one of atrazine, cyanazine, prometryn and metribuzin. A composition according to claim 1, wherein said ingredient (b) is selected from the herbicidal uracil compounds. A composition according to claim 4, wherein said ingredient (b) is at least one of isoprocil, bromacil and lenacil. A composition according to claim 1, wherein said ingredient (b) is selected from the urea compounds. A composition according to claim 6, wherein said ingredient (b) is at least one of fenuron, monuron, monolinuron, buturon, diuron, linuron, metoxuron, chlortoluron, isoproturon and fluometuron. A composition according to claim 1, wherein said ingredient (b) is selected form the herbicidal dinitro aniline compounds. A composition according to claim 8, wherein said ingredient (b) is at least one of trifluralin, benefin, pendimethalin, oryzalin, ethalfluralin and prodiamine. A composition according to claim 1, wherein said ingredient (b) is norflurazon. A composition according to claim 1, wherein said ingredient (b) is dimethazone. A composition according to claim 1, wherein said ingredient (b) is at least one of imazaquin and imazethapyr. A composition according to any of claims 1 to 12, wherein R¹ is halo(C₁-C₂)alkyl, R² is C₁-C₂ alkyl, R³ is C₁-C₆ alkoxy, C₁-C₆ alkyl or halo(C₁-C₆)alkyl, R⁴ is hydrogen or fluorine at the para position. A method for controlling undesired weeds, which comprises applying the composition according to any one of claims 1-13 to the area where undesired weeds grow or will grow. A method according to claim 14, which comprises applying the composition according to claim 2, 3, 6 or 7 to the area which is a field of cotton, soybean, corn, wheat or barley. A method according to claim 14, which comprises applying the composition according to claim 8 or 9 to the area which is a field of cotton, soybean or rice plant. A method according to claim 14, which comprises applying the composition according to claim 10, 11 or 12 to the area which is a field of cotton or soybean. Use of the composition according to any of claims 1 to 13 as a herbicide.

Inventors: HAMADA TATSUHIRO, IZUMI KEIICHI, KAWAMURA SHINICHI, SANEMITSU YUZURU, SATO JUNICHI, SATO RYO, SHIBATA HIDEYUKI, HAMADA, TATSUHIRO, IZUMI, KEIICHI, KAWAMURA, SHINICHI, SANEMITSU, YUZURU, SATO, JUNICHI, SATO, RYO, SHIBATA, HIDEYUKI
Applicants: SUMITOMO CHEMICAL CO, SUMITOMO CHEMICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Application year: 1992
Main classification: A01N43
IPC codes: A01N47, A01N43