SCREENING ASSAY FOR THE DETECTION OF DNA-BINDING MOLECULES

Abstract: The present invention defines an assay useful for screening libraries of synthetic or biological compounds for their ability to bind specific DNA test sequences. The assay is also useful for determining the sequence specificity and relative DNA-binding affinity of DNA-binding molecules for any particular DNA sequence. The assay is a competition assay in which binding of a test molecule to a DNA test sequence changes the binding characteristics of a DNA-binding protein to its binding sequence. When such a test molecule binds the test sequence the equilibrium of the DNA:protein complexes is disturbed, generating changes in the ratio between unbound DNA and DNA:protein complexes. The assay is versatile in that any test sequence can be tested by placing the test sequence adjacent to a defined protein binding DNA screening sequence.

Description: SCREENING ASSAY FOR THE DETECTION OF DNA-BINDING MOLECULES Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method, a syste and a kit useful for the identification of molecules th specifically bind to defined nucleic acid sequences. References Ambinder, R.F., et al . , J. Virol . 65:1466-1478, 199 Ausubel, F. M. , et al., Current Protocols in Molecul Bioloσv. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Media PA. Banerji, S.S., et al., Mol . Cell Biol . 11:4074-408 1991. Beal, P.A., et al . , Science 251:1360-1363, 1991. Birg, F., et al . , Nucl . Acids Res . 18:2901-2908, 199 Chaiet, L., et al., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 106 (1964) . Chang, H.-K, et al., Mol . Cell . Biol . Nov. :5189-519 1989. Chang, H.-K,, et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. November 5189-5197 (1989) . Chen, K-X., et al., J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2:445-4 (1985). Chin, M.T., et al., J. Virol. 63:2967-2976, 1989. Cooney, M. , et al.. Science 241:456-459, 1988. Courtois, G. , et al., Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U 85:7937-7941 (1988). Cullinane, C. , et al . , FEBS lett . 293:195-198, 199 Edwards, CA., et al . , J. Mol . Biol . 180:73-90, 1984. Edwards, CA. and Crabtree, G.R. Molecular regulati of T lymphocyte activation. In: Advances in Regulation Cell Growth, Volume I: Regulation of Cell Growth a Activation, edited by Mond, J.J. , Weiss, A. and Cambie J.C New York: Raven Press, 1989, p. 91-118. Elias, P., et al . , J. Biol . Chem. 265:17167-1717 1990. Elias, P., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA £5:295 2963 (1988) . Fried, M.G., et al., Nuc. Acid. Res. 9:6505 (1981). Froehler, et al. , Nucleic Acids Res. 16:4831 (1988) Galas, D., et al., Nuc.Acid Res. 5_:3157-3170 (1981) Garner, M.M. , et al., Nuc. Acid. Res. 9:3047 (1981). Gaugain, B., et al., Biochemistry 17:5078, 1978. Gaugain, B., et al . , Biochemistry 17:5071, 1978. Gessner, R.V., et al. f Biochemistry 24:237-240 (1985) Gilbert, D.F., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US 86__3006 (1988). Gilman, A. G., et al., eds.. The Pharmacological Basi of Therapeutics. Eighth Edition, Pergamon Press (1990) . Goldin, A.L., et al., J. Virol. 38_:5-58 (1981). Green, N.M. , Adv. Protein Chem. 22.S85 (1975). Greene, W.C Regulation of HIV-1 gene expression Annu. Rev. Immunol . 8:453-475, 1990. Griffin, L.C, et al., Science 245:967-971, 1989. Gross, D.S., et al., Annu. Re v. Biochem. 57:159-197 1988. Harlow, E. , et al.. Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1988) . Helene, C, et al., Genome 31:413-420, 1989. Helene, C, et al . , Biochim. Biophys. Act 1049:99-125, 1990. Jain, S.C, et al., J. Mol. Biol. 68:1-20 (1972). Kadonaga, J.T., PNAS 81:5889-5893 (1986). Koff, A., et al., J. Virol. 62:4096-4103 (1988). Kuhlmann, K.F., et al . , Nucl . Acids Res . 5:2629, 197 Laugaa, P., et al . , Biochemistry 23:1336, 1985. Le Pecq, J.B., et al . , Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci . U.S. 72:2915-2919, 1975. Luck, G., et al. , Nucl. Acids Res. 1:503 (1974). Luckow, V.A. , et al.. Virology 120:31 (1989). Maher III, L.J., et al., Science 245:725-730, 1989. Maniatis, T., et al. Molecular Cloning: A Laborato Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (1982) . McGeoch, D. J. , et al., J. Virology . 52.(2) :444 (1988) McGeoch, D.J., et al., J". Virol. 62:444-453, 1988. Miller, P.S., et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,507,43 issued 26 March 1985. Miller, et al.. Biochemistry 18:5134 (1979). Miller, et al., J Biol Chem 255_:6959 (1980). Miller, et al. , Biochimie £7:769 (1985). Nielsen, P., et al . , Science 254:1497-1500 (1991). Olivo, P.D., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U 15:5414-5418 (1988). Olivo, P.D., et al., J. Virology 1:196-204 (1989). Pelaprat, D., et al., J. Med. Chem. 23:1336-1343 1980. Perouault, L., et al., Nature 344:358-360, 1990. Phillips, D.R., et al . , Anti-Cancer Drug Desi 5:21-29, 1990. Phillips, D.R. , Biochemistry 25:7355-7362, 1986. Polinksy, B., et al., PNAS 72:3310-4 (1975). Quigley, G.J., et al.. Science 232:1255-1258 (1986) Reis an, D. , et al . , Mol . Cell . Biol . 5:1822-1832 1985. Salas, X., et al., FEBS lett . 292:223-228, 1991. Sambrook, J., et al.. In Molecular Cloning: A Lab ratorv Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Vol. (1989) . Schmidt, A., et al . , J. Virol . 64:4037-4041, 1990. Sherman, S.E., et al., Chem. Rev. 87:1153 (1987). Siebenlist, U., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US 77:122-126 (1980). Skorobogaty, A.,, et al., Anti-Cancer Drug Desig 3:41-56, 1988. Smith, D.B., et al. , Gene 67:31 (1988). Sobell, H.M., et al. , J. Mol. Biol. 6.8:21-34 (1972). Sobell, H.M., Prof. Nucl. Acid. Res. Mol. Biol 11:153-190 (1973). Stow, N.D., et al., J. Gen. Virol . 67:1613-1623, 1986 Stow, N.D., et al.. Virology 130:427-438 (1983). Strobel, S.A., et al.. Science 249:73-75, 1990. Summers, M.D., et al., A manual of Methods fo Baculovirus Vectors and Insect Cell Culture Procedures, Texas Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin, No. 155 (1987). Summerton, J.E., et al . , U.S. Patent No. 5,034,506, issued 23 July 1991. Summerton, J.E., et al . , P.C.I. Internationa Application PCT/US86/00544, International Publication No. WO 86/05518, published 25 September 1986. Tullius, T.D., Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biochem. 18:213-237 (1989) . Tullius, T.D., Annu. .Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 18:213-237, 1989. Wartel, R.M., et al. , J. Biol. Chem. 15:285-318 (1975) . Weir, H.M., et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 17:1409-1425 (1989). Woodbury, C.P., et al. , Biochemistry 12.(20) :4730-4737 (1983). Wu, A., et al., J. Virol. 62:435-443 (1988). Young, S.L., et al., Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci . U.S.A. 88:10023-10026, 1991. Zein, N. , et al.. Science 240:1198 (1988). Zimmer, C, Pros. Nucl. Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 15:28 318 (1975). Background of the Invention Several classes of small molecules that interact wi double-stranded DNA have been identified. Many of the small molecules have profound biological effects. F example, many aminoacridines and polycyclic hydrocarbo bind DNA and are mutagenic, teratogenic, or carcinogeni Other small molecules that bind DNA include: biologic metabolites, some of which have applications as antibioti and antitumor agents including actinomycin D, echinomyci distamycin, and calicheamicin; planar dyes, such ethidium and acridine orange; and molecules that conta heavy metals, such as cisplatin, a potent antitumor drug Most known DNA-binding molecules do not have a kno sequence binding preference. However, there are a f small DNA-binding molecules that preferentially recogni specific nucleotide sequences, for example: echinomyc preferentially binds the sequence [(A/T)CGT]/[ACG(A/T) (Gilbert et al.); cisplatin covalently cross-links platinum molecule between the N7 atoms of two adjace deoxyguanosines (Sherman et al.); and calicheamic preferentially binds and cleaves the sequence TCCT/AG (Zein et al.) . The biological response elicited by most therapeut DNA-binding molecules is toxicity, specific only in th these molecules may preferentially affect cells that a more actively replicating or transcribing DNA than oth cells. Targeting specific sites may significantly decrea toxicity simply by reducing the number of potential bindi sites in the DNA. As specificity for longer sequences acquired, the nonspecific toxic effects due to DNA-bindi may decrease. Many therapeutic DNA-binding molecul initially identi ied based on their therapeutic activity a biological screen have been later determined to bind DN Therefore, there is a need for an in vitro ass useful to screen for DNA-binding molecules. There is al a need for an assay that allows the discrimination sequence binding preferences of such molecule Additionally, there is a need for an assay that allows t determination of the relative affinities of a DNA-bindi molecule for different DNA sequences. Finally, there is need for therapeutic molecules that bind to specific D sequences. Summary of the Invention The present invention provides a method for screenin molecules or compounds capable of binding to a selecte test sequence in a duplex DNA. The method involves addin a molecule to be screened, or a mixture containing th molecule, to a test system. The test system includes a DN binding protein that is effective to bind to a screenin sequence, i.e. the DNA binding protein's cognate bindin site, in a duplex DNA with a binding affinity that i preferably substantially independent of the sequence adjacent the binding sequence — these adjacent sequence are referred to as test sequences. But, the DNA bindin protein is sensitive to binding of molecules to such tes sequence, when the test sequence is adjacent the screenin sequence. The test system further includes a duplex DN having the screening and test sequences adjacent on another. Also, the binding protein is present in an amoun that saturates the screening sequence in the duplex DNA The test molecule is incubated in contact with the tes system for a period sufficient to permit binding of th molecule being tested to the test sequence in the duple DNA. The amount of binding protein bound to the duplex DN is compared before and after the addition of the te molecule or mixture. Candidates for the screening sequence/binding prote may be selected from the following group: EBV origin replication/EBNA, HSV origin of replication/UL9, VZV orig of replication/UL9-like, HPV origin of replication/E interleukin 2 enhancer/NFAT-1, HIV-LTR/NFAT-1, HI LTR/NFkB, HBV enhancer/HNF-1, fibrinogen promoter/HNF- lambda o L -o R / cro, and essentially any other DNA:prote interactions. A preferred embodiment of the present inventi utilizes the UL9 protein, or DNA-binding proteins deriv therefrom, and its cognate binding sequence SEQ ID NO: SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:17, or SEQ ID NO:15. The test sequences can be any combination of sequenc of interest. The sequences may be randomly generated f shot-gun approach screening or specific sequences may chosen. Some specific sequences of medical intere include the following sequences involved in DNA:prote interactions: EBV origin of replication, HSV origin replication, VZV origin of replication, HPV origin replication, interleukin 2 enhancer, HIV-LTR, HBV enhance and fibrinogen promoter. Furthermore, a set of assay te sequences comprised of all possible sequences of a giv length could be tested (eg., all four base pair sequences In the above method, comparison of protein-bound free DNA can be accomplished using any detection assa preferably, a gel band-shift assay, a filter-binding assa or a capture/detection assay. In one embodiment of the DNA capture/detection assa in which the DNA that is not bound to protein is capture the capture system involves the biotinylation of nucleotide within the screening sequence (i) that does n eliminate the protein's ability to bind to the screeni sequence, (ii) that is capable of binding streptavidin, a (iii) where the biotin moiety is protected fr interactions with streptavidin when the protein is bound the screening sequence. The capture/detection assay al involves the detection of the captured DNA. In another embodiment of the DNA capture/detecti assay, the capture system in which the DNA:prote complexes are captured, the capture system involves the u of nitrocellulose filters under low salt conditions capture the protein-bound DNA while allowing the no protein-bound DNA to pass through the filter. The present invention also includes a screening syste for identifying molecules that are capable of binding to test sequence in a duplex DNA sequence. The syste includes a DNA binding protein that is effective to bind t a screening sequence in a duplex DNA with a bindin affinity that is substantially independent of a tes sequence adjacent the screening sequence. The binding o the DNA protein is, however, sensitive to binding o molecules to the test sequence when the test sequence i adjacent the screening sequence. The system includes duplex DNA having the screening and test sequences adjacen one another. Typically, the binding protein is present i an amount that saturates the screening sequence in th duplex DNA. The system also includes means for detectin the amount of binding protein bound to the DNA. . As described above the test sequences can be an number of sequences of interest. The screening sequence/binding protein can be selecte from known DNA:protein interactions using the criteria an guidance of the present disclosure. It can also be applie to DNA:Protein interactions later discovered. A preferred embodiment of the screening system of th present invention includes the UL9 protein, or DNA-bindin protein derived therefrom (e.g., the truncated UL9 protei designated UL9-COOH) . In this embodiment the duplex DN has (i) a screening sequence selected from the grou consisting of SEQ ID NO:l, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:17 an SEQ ID NO:15, and (ii) a test sequence adjacent th screening sequence, where UL9 is present in an amount tha saturates the screening sequence. The system furthe includes means for detecting the amount of UL9 bound to th DNA, including, band-shift assays, filter-binding assays and capture/detection assays. The present disclosure describes the procedures neede to test DNA:protein interactions for their suitability fo use in the screening assay of the present invention. The present invention further defines DNA captur systems and detection systems. Several methods ar described. A filter binding assay can be used to captur the DNA:protein complexes or, alternatively, the DNA no bound by protein can be captured by the following method In the first part of this system, the cognate DNA bindin site of the DNA binding protein is modified with detection moiety, such as biotin or digoxigenin. Th modification must be made to the site in such a manner tha (i) it does not eliminate the protein's ability to bind t the cognate binding sequence, (ii) the moiety is accessibl to the capturing agent (e.g., in the case of biotin th agent is streptavidin) in DNA that is not bound to protein and (iii) where the moiety is protected from interaction with the capture agent when the protein is bound to th screening sequence. In the second part of this system, the targe oligonucleotide is labelled to allow detection. Labellin of the target oligonucleotide can be accomplished b standard techniques such as radiolabelling. Alternatively, a moiety such as digoxigenin can be incorporated in th target oligonucleotide and this moiety can then be detecte after capture. Three embodiments of the capture/detection syst described by the present disclosure are as follows: (i) the target oligonucleotide (containing, fo example, the screening and test sequences) — modificatio of the cognate binding site with biotin and incorporatio of digoxigenin or radioactivity (eg., "S or n P) ; capture o the target oligonucleotide using streptavidin attached t a solid support; and detection of the targe oligonucleotide using a tagged anti-digoxigenin antibody o radioactivity measurement (eg., autoradiography, countin in scintillation fluor, or using a phosphoimager) . (ii) the target oligonucleotide — modification of th cognate binding site with digoxigenin and incorporation o biotin or radioactivity; capture of the targe oligonucleotide using an anti-digoxigenin antibod attached to a solid support; and detection of the targe oligonucleotide using tagged streptavidin or radioactivit measurements. (iii) separation of the target oligonucleotide whic is bound to protein from the target oligonucleotide whic is not bound to protein by passing the assay mixtur through a nitrocellulose filter under conditions in whic the protein:DNA complexes are retained by th nitrocellulose while the non-protein bound DNA passe through the nitrocellulose; and detection of the targe oligonucleotide using radioactivity, tagged anti digoxigenin:digoxigenin interactions, or tagge streptavidin:biotin interactions. Brief Description of the Figures Figure 1A illustrates a DNA-binding protein binding to a screening sequence. Figures IB and 1C illustrate how a DNA-binding protein may be displaced or hindered in binding by a small molecule by two different mechanisms: because of steric hinderance (IB) or because of conformationa (allosteric) changes induced in the DNA by a small molecul (1C). Figure 2 illustrates an assay for detecting inhibitor molecules based on their ability to preferentially hinde the binding of a DNA-binding protein to its binding site Protein (O) is displaced from DNA (/) in the presence o inhibitor (X) . Two alternative capture/detection system are illustrated, the capture and detection of unbound DN or the capture and detection of DNA:protein complexes. Figure 3 shows a DNA-binding protein that is able t protect a biotin moiety, covalently attached to th oligonucleotide sequence, from being recognized by th streptavidin when the protein is bound to the DNA. Figure 4A shows the incorporation of biotin an digoxigenin into a typical oligonucleotide molecule for us in the assay of the present invention. The oligonucleotid contains the binding sequence (i.e., the screenin sequence) of the UL9 protein, which is underlined, and tes sequences flanking the screening sequence. Figure 4B show the preparation of double-stranded oligonucleotides end labeled with either digoxigenin or 32 P. Figure 5 shows a series of sequences that have bee tested in the assay of the present invention for th binding of sequence-specific small molecules. Figure 6 outlines the cloning of a truncated form o the UL9 protein, which retains its sequence-specific DNA binding ability (UL9-COOH) , into an expression vector. Figure 7 shows the pVL1393 baculovirus vecto containing the full length UL9 protein coding sequence. Figure 8 is a photograph of a SDS-polyacrylamide ge showing (i) the purifiedUL9-C00H/glutathione-S-transferas fusion protein and (ii) the UL9-C00H polypeptide. In th figure the UL9-COOH polypeptide is indicated by an arrow. Figure 9 shows the effect on UL9-COOH binding alterations in the test sequences that flank the U screening sequence. The data are displayed on band shi gels. Figure 10A shows the effect of the addition of sever concentrations of Distamycin A to DNA:protein ass reactions utilizing different test sequences. Figure 1 shows the effect of the addition of Actinomycin D DNA:protein assay reactions utilizing different te sequences. Figure IOC shows the effect of the addition Doxorubicin to DNA:protein assay reactions utilizi different test sequences. Figure 11A illustrates a DNA capture system of t present invention utilizing biotin and streptavidin coat magnetic beads. The presence of the DNA is detected usi an alkaline-phosphatase substrate that yields chemiluminescent product. Figure 11B shows a simila reaction using biotin coated agarose beads that ar conjugated to streptavidin, that in turn is conjugated t the captured DNA. Figure 12 demonstrates a test matrix based o DNA:protein-binding data. Figure 13 lists the top strands (5'-3') of all th possible four base pair sequences that could be used as defined set of ordered test sequences in the assay (for screening sequence having n bases, where n=4) . . Figure 14 lists the top strands (5'-3') of all th possible four base pair sequences that have the same bas composition as the sequence 5'-GATC-3'. This is anothe example of a defined, ordered set of sequences that coul be tested in the assay. Figure 15 shows an example of an oligonucleotid molecule containing test sequences flanking a screenin sequence. The sequence of this molecule is presented a SEQ ID NO:18, where the "X" of Figure 15 is N in SEQ I NO: 18. Detailed Description of the Invention Definitions: Adjacent is used to describe the distance relationsh between two neighboring DNA sites. Adjacent sites are or less bp apart, or more preferably, 10 or less bp apar or even more preferably, 5 or less bp apart, or mo preferably, immediately abutting one another. "Flankin is a synonym for adjacent. Bound DNA. as used in this disclosure, refers to t DNA that is bound by the protein used in the assay (ie., the examples of this disclosure, the UL9 protein) . Dissociation is the process by which two molecul cease to interact: the process occurs at a fixed avera rate under specific physical conditions. Functional binding is the noncovalent association a protein or small molecule to the DNA molecule. In t assay of the present invention the functional binding the protein to the screening sequence (i.e., its cogna DNA binding site) has been evaluated using filter bindi or gel band-shift experiments. Heteromolecules are molecules that are comprised of least two different types of molecules: for example, t covalent coupling of at least two small organic DNA-bindi molecules (eg., distamycin, actinomycin D, or acridine) each other or the covalent coupling of such a DNA-bindi molecule(s) to a DNA-binding polymer (eg., deoxyoligonucleotide) . On-rate is herein defined as the time required for t molecules to reach steady state association: for exampl the DNA:protein complex. Off-rate is herein defined as the time required fo one-half of the associated complexes, e.g., DNA:protei complexes, to dissociate. Seouence-specific binding refers to DNA bindi molecules which have a strong DNA sequence bindi preference. For example, restriction enzymes and t proteins listed in Table I demonstrate typical sequenc specific DNA-binding. Seguence-preferential binding refers to DNA bindi molecules that generally bind DNA but that show preferen for binding to some DNA sequences over others. Sequenc preferential binding is typified by several of the sma molecules tested in the present disclosure, e.g distamycin. Sequence-preferential and sequence-specif binding can be evaluated using a test matrix such as presented in Figure 12. For a given DNA-binding molecul there are a spectrum of differential affinities f dif erent DNA sequences ranging from non-sequence-specif (no detectable preference) to sequence preferential absolute sequence specificity (ie., the recognition of on a single sequence among all possible sequences, as is t case with many restriction endonucleases) . Screening secruence is the DNA sequence that define the cognate binding site for the DNA binding protein: i the case of UL9 the screening sequence can, for example, b SEQ ID NO:l. Small molecules are desirable as therapeutics fo several reasons related to drug delivery: (i) they ax commonly less than 10 K molecular weight; (ii) they ar more likely to be permeable to cells; (iii) unlik peptides or oligonucleotides, they are less susceptible t degradation by many cellular mechanisms; and, (iv) the are not as apt to elicit an i mune response. Man pharmaceutical companies have extensive libraries o chemical and/or biological mixtures, often fungal bacterial, or algal extracts, that would be desirable t screen with the assay of the present invention. Smal molecules may be either biological or synthetic organi compounds, or even inorganic compounds (i.e., cisplatin) Test seouence is a DNA sequence adjacent the screeni sequence. The assay of the present invention screens f molecules that, when bound to the test sequence, affect t interaction of the DNA-binding protein with its cogna binding site (i.e., the screening sequence). Tes sequences can be placed adjacent either or both ends of t screening sequence. Typically, binding of molecules to t test sequence interferes with the binding of the DNA binding protein to the screening sequence. However, som molecules binding to these sequences may have the revers effect, causing an increased binding affinity of the DNA binding protein to the screening sequence. Some molecules even while binding in a sequence specific or sequenc preferential manner, might have no effect in the assay These molecules would not be detected in the assay. Unbound DNA. as used in this disclosure, refers to th DNA that is not bound by the protein used in the assa (ie., in the examples of this disclosure, the UL9 protein) I. The Assay One feature of the present invention is that i provides an assay to identify small molecules that wil bind in a sequence-specific manner to medically significan DNA target sites. The assay facilitates the development o a new field of pharmaceuticals that operate by interferin with specific DNA functions, such as crucial DNA:protei interactions. A sensitive, well-controlled assay to detec DNA-binding molecules and to determine their sequence specificity and affinity has been developed. The assay ca be used to screen large biological and chemical libraries for example, the assay will be used to detect sequence specific DNA-binding molecules in fermentation broths o extracts from various microorganisms. Furthermore, anothe application for the assay is to determine the sequenc specificity and relative affinities of known DNA-bindi drugs (and other DNA-binding molecules) for different D sequences. The drugs, which are primarily used anticancer treatments, may have previously unidentifi activities that make them strong candidates f therapeutics or therapeutic precursors in entire different areas of medicine. The screening assay is basically a competition ass that is designed to test the ability of a molecule compete with a DNA-binding protein for binding to a shor synthetic, double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide th contains the recognition sequence for the DNA-bindi protein flanked on either or both sides by a variable tes site. The variable test site may contain any DNA sequen that provides a reasonable recognition sequence for a DN binding molecule. Molecules that bind to the test sit alter the binding characteristics of the protein in manner that can be readily detected; the extent to whic such molecules are able to alter the bindin characteristics of the protein is likely to be directl proportional to the affinity of the test molecule for th DNA test site. The relative affinity of a given molecul for different oligonucleotide sequences at the test sit (i.e., the test sequences) can be established by examinin its effect on the DNA:protein interaction in each of th oligonucleotides. The determination of the high affinit DNA.binding sites for DNA-binding molecules will allow u to identify specific target sequences for drug development A. General Considerations. The assay of the present invention has been designe for detecting test molecules or compounds that affect th rate of transfer of a specific DNA molecule from on protein molecule to another identical protein in solution A mixture of DNA and protein is prepared in solution. The concentration of protein is in excess to t concentration of the DNA so that virtually all of the D is found in DNA: rotein complexes. The DNA is a doubl stranded oligonucleotide that contains the recogniti sequence for a specific DNA-binding protein (i.e., t screening sequence) . The protein used in the ass contains a DNA-binding domain that is specific for bindi to the sequence within the oligonucleotide. The physic conditions of the solution (e.g., pH, salt concentratio temperature) are adjusted such that the half-life of t complex is amenable to performing the assay (optimally half-life of 5-30 minutes) , preferably in a range that i close to normal physiological conditions. As one DNA: rotein complex dissociates, the release DNA rapidly reforms a complex with another protein i solution. Since the protein is in excess to the DNA dissociations of one complex always result in the rapi reassociation of the DNA into another DNA:protein complex At equilibrium, very few DNA molecules will be unbound The minimum background of the assay is the amount o unbound DNA observed during any given measurable ti period. The brevity of the observation period and th sensitivity of the detection system define the lower limit of background DNA. Figure 1 illustrates how such a protein can b displaced from its cognate binding site or how a protei can be prevented from binding its cognate binding site, o how the kinetics of the DNA:protein interaction can b altered. One mechanism is steric hinderance of protei binding by a small molecule. Alternatively, a molecule ma interfere with a DNA:protein binding interaction b inducing a conformational change in the DNA. In eithe event, if a test molecule that binds the oligonucleotid hinders binding of the protein, the rate of transfer of DN from one protein to another will be decreased. This wil result in a net increase in the amount of unbound DNA. other words, an increase in the amount of unbound DNA or decrease in the amount of bound DNA indicates the presen of an inhibitor. Alternatively, molecules may be isolated that, wh bound to the DNA, cause an increased affinity of the DN binding protein for its cognate binding site. In this cas the amount of unbound DNA (observed during a give measurable time period after the addition of the molecule will decrease in the reaction mixture as detected by th capture/detection system described in Section II. B. Other Methods There are several approaches that could be taken t look for small molecules that specifically inhibit th interaction of a given DNA-binding protein with its bindin sequence (cognate site) . One approach would be to tes biological or chemical compounds for their ability t preferentially block the binding of one specifi DNA:protein interaction but not the others. Such an assa would depend on the development of at least two, preferabl three, DNA:protein interaction systems in order t establish controls for distinguishing between general DNA binding molecules (polycations like heparin o intercalating agents like ethidium) and DNA-bindin molecules having sequence binding preferences that woul affect protein/cognate binding site interactions in on system but not the other(s) . One illustration of how this system could be used i as follows. Each cognate site could be placed 5' to reporter gene (such as genes encoding 3-galactoside o luciferase) such that binding of the protein to the cognat site would enhance transcription of the reporter gene. Th presence of a sequence-specific DNA-binding drug tha blocked the DNA:protein interaction would decrease th enhancement of the reporter gene expression. Several D enhancers could be coupled to reporter genes, then ea construct compared to one another in the presence absence of small DNA-binding test molecules. In the ca where multiple protein/cognate binding sites are used f screening, a competitive inhibitor that blocks o interaction but not the others could be identified by t lack of transcription of a reporter gene in a transfect cell line or in an in vitro assay. Only one such DN binding sequence, specific for the protein of interes could be screened with each assay system. This approa has a number of limitations including limited testi capability and the need to construct the appropria reporter system for each different protein/cognate site interest. C Choosing and Testing an Appropriate DNA-Bindi Protein. Experiments performed in support of the prese invention have defined a second approach for identifyi molecules having sequence-preferential DNA-binding. this approach small molecules binding to sequences adjace the cognate binding sequence can inhibit t protein/cognate DNA interaction. This assay has be designed to use a single DNA:protein interaction to scre for sequence-specific or sequence-preferential DNA-bindi molecules that recognize virtually any sequence. . While DNA-binding recognition sites are usually qui small (4-17 bp) , the sequence that is protected by t binding protein is larger (usually 5 bp or more on eith side of the recognition sequence — as detected by DNAa I protection (Galas et al.) or methylation interferen (Siebenlist et al.). Experiments performed in support the present invention demonstrated that a single prote and its cognate DNA-binding sequence can be used to ass virtually any DNA sequence by placing a sequence interest adjacent to the cognate site: a small molecu bound to the adjacent site can be detected by alteratio in the binding characteristics of the protein to i cognate site. Such alterations might occur by eith steric hindrance, which would cause the dissociation of t protein, or induced conformational changes in t recognition sequence for the protein, which may cau either enhanced binding or more likely, decreased bindi of the protein to its cognate site. 1) Criteria for choosing an appropriate DNA-bindi protein. There are several considerations involved in choosin DNA:protein complexes that can be employed in the assay o the present invention including: a) The off-rate (see "Definitions") should b fast enough to accomplish the assay in a reasonable amoun of time. The interactions of some proteins with cognat sites in DNA can be measured in days not minutes: suc tightly bound complexes would inconveniently lengthen th period of time it takes to perform the assay. b) The off-rate should be slow enough to allo the measurement of unbound DNA in a reasonable amount o time. For example, the level of free DNA is dictated b the ratio between the time needed to measure free DNA an the amount of free DNA that occurs naturally due to th off-rate during the measurement time period. . In view of the above two considerations, practica useful DNA:protein off-rates fall in the range o approximately two minutes to several days, although shorte off-rates may be accomodated by faster equipment and longe off-rates may be accomodated by destabilizing the bindin conditions for the assay. c) A further consideration is that the kineti interactions of the DNA:protein complex is relativel insensitive to the nucleotide sequences flanking th recognition sequence. The affinity of many DNA-bindi proteins is affected by differences in the sequenc adjacent to the recognition sequence. The most obvio example of this phenomenon is the preferential binding a cleavage of restriction enzymes given a choice of sever identical recognition sequences with different flanki sequences (Polinsky et al.). If the off-rates are affect by flanking sequences the analysis of comparative bindi data between different flanking oligonucleotide sequence becomes difficult but is not impossible. 2) Testing DNA:protein interactions for use in th assay. Experiments performed in support of the presen invention have identified a DNA:protein interaction that i particularly useful for the above described assay: th Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) UL9 protein that binds the HS origin of replication (oriS) . The UL9 protein has fairl stringent sequence specificity. There appear to be thre binding sites for UL9 in oriS, SEQ ID NO:l, SEQ ID NO:2 SEQ ID NO:17 (Elias, P. et al.. Stow et al.). On sequence (SEQ ID NO:l) binds with at least 10-fold highe affinity than the second sequence (SEQ ID NO:2): th embodiments described below use the higher affinity bindin site (SEQ ID NO:l) . DNA:protein association reactions are performed i solution. The DNA:protein complexes can be separated fro free DNA by any of several methods. One particularl useful method for the initial study of DNA:protei interactions has been visualization of binding result using band shift gels (Example 3A) . In this metho DNA:protein binding reactions are applied t polyacrylamide/TBE gels and the labelled complexes and fre labeled DNA are separated electrophoretically. These gel are fixed, dried, and exposed to X-ray film. The resultin autoradiograms are examined for the amount of free prob that is migrating separately from the DNA:protein comple These assays include (i) a lane containing only fr labeled probe, and (ii) a lane where the sample is label probe in the presence of a large excess of binding protei The band shift assays allow visualization of the ratio between DNA:protein complexes and free probe. However they are less accurate than filter binding assays for rate determining experiments due to the lag time between loadin the gel and electrophoretic separation of the components The filter binding method is particularly useful i determining the off-rates for protein:oligonucleotid complexes (Example 3B) . In the filter binding assay DNA:protein complexes are retained on a filter while fre DNA passes through the filter. This assay method is mor accurate for off-rate determinations because the separatio of DNA:protein complexes from free probe is very rapid The disadvantage of filter binding is that the nature o the DNA:protein complex cannot be directly visualized. S if, for example, the competing molecule was also a protei competing for the binding of a site on the DNA molecule, filter binding assays cannot differentiate between th binding of the two proteins nor yield information abou whether one or both proteins are binding. There are many known DNA:protein interactions that ma be useful in the practice of the present invention, including (i) the DNA protein interactions listed in Tabl I, (ϋ) bacterial, yeast, and phage systems such as lambd o L -o R /cro, and (iii) modified restriction enzyme systems (e.g., protein binding in the absence of divalent cations). Any protein that binds to a specific recognition sequence may be useful in the present invention. One constraining factor is the effect of the immediately adjacent sequences (the test sequences) on the affinity of the protein for its recognition sequence. DNA:protein interactions in which there is little or no effect of the test sequences on t affinity of the protein for its cognate site are preferab for use in the described assay; however, DNA:prote interactions that exhibit (test sequence-dependen differential binding may still be useful if algorithms a applied to the analysis of data that compensate for t differential affinity. In general, the effect of flanki sequence composition on the binding of the protein likely to be correlated to the length of the recogniti sequence for the DNA-binding protein. In short, t kinetics of binding for proteins with shorter recogniti sequences are more likely to suffer from flanking sequen effects, while the kinetics of binding for proteins wi longer recognition sequences are more likely to not affected by flanking sequence composition. The prese disclosure provides methods and guidance for testing t usefulness of such DNA:protein interactions, i.e., oth than the UL9 oriS binding site interaction, in t screening assay. D. Preparation of Full Length UL9 and UL9-CO Polypeptides. UL9 protein has been prepared by a number recombinant techniques (Example 2) . The full length U protein has been prepared from baculovirus infected inse cultures (Example 3A, B, and C) . Further, a portion of t UL9 protein that contains the DNA-binding domain (UL9-C00 has .been cloned into a bacterial expression vector a produced by bacterial cells (Example 3D and E) . The DN binding domain of UL9 is contained within the C-termin 317 amino acids of the protein (Weir et al.). The UL COOH polypeptide was inserted into the expression vect in-frame with the glutathione-S-transferase (gst) protei The gst/UL9 fusion protein was purified using affini chromatography (Example 3E) . The vector also contained thrombin cleavage site at the junction of the t polypeptides. Therefore, once the fusion protein was Isolated ( Figure 8, lane 2) it was treated w i th thromb i n cleaving the UL 9 - C00 H/gst fusion protein from the gst polypeptide (Figure 8 , lane 3). The UL9-C 00 H-gst fusion polypeptide was obtained at a protein purity of greater than 95% as determined using Coomaisie sta i n i ng. O ther hybrid proteins can be utilized to prepare DN A - binding proteins of interest. For example, fusing a DNA- binding protein coding sequence in-frame with a sequenc encoding the thrombin site and also in-frame with the β galactoside coding sequence. Such hybrid proteins can b isolated by affinity or immunoaffinity columns ( Mamat i s e al • Pierce, Rockford IL) . Further, DNA-binding prote i n can'be isolated b y affinity chromatography based on thei ability to interact with their cognate DNA binding s i te. For example, the UL 9 DNA-binding site (SE Q ID N O :l ) can b covalently linked to a solid support (e.g., CnBr-activate Sepharose 4B beads, Pharmacia, Piscataway N J) , extract passed over the support, the support washed, and the DNA binding then isolated from the support with a salt grad i en ( Kadonaga ) . Alternatively, other expression systems bacteria, yeast, insect cells or mammalian cells can b used to express adequate levels of a DNA-binding protei for use in this assay. The results presented below in regard to the DNA binding ability of the truncated UL9 protein suggest tha full length DN A -binding proteins are not required for th DNA-.protein assay of the present invention: only a port i o of the protein containing the cognate site recogn i t i o function may be required. The portion of a DNA-bindin p rotein required for DNA-binding can be evaluated us i ng functional binding assay (Example 4A) . The rate o dissociation can be evaluated (Example 4B) and compared t that of the full length DNA-binding protein. However, an DNA-binding peptide, truncated or full length, may be use in the assay if it meets the criteria outlined in pa I.C.I, "Criteria for choosing an appropriate DNA-bindi protein". This remains true whether or not the truncat form of the DNA-binding protein has the same affinity the full length DNA-binding protein. E. Functional Binding and Rate of Dissociation. The full length UL9 and purified UL9-COOH protei were tested for functional activity in "band shift" assa (see Example 4A) . The buffer conditions were optimized f DNA:protein-binding (Example 4C) using the UL9-CO polypeptide. These DNA-binding conditions also worked we for the full-length UL9 protein. Radiolabell oligonucleotides (SEQ ID NO:14) that contained the 11 UL9 DNA-binding recognition sequence (SEQ ID NO:l) we mixed with each UL9 protein in appropriate binding buffe The reactions were incubated at room temperature for 1 minutes (binding occurs in less than 2 minutes) and t products were separated electrophoretically on no denaturing polyacrylamide gels (Example 4A) . The degree o DNA:protein-binding could be determined from the ratio labeled probe present in DNA:protein complexes versus tha present as free probe. This ratio was typicall determined by optical scanning of autoradiograms a comparison of band intensities. Other standard methods ma be used as well for this determination, such a scintillation counting of excised bands. The UL9-COO polypeptide and the full length UL9 polypeptide, in thei respective buffer conditions, bound the targe oligonucleotide equally well. The rate of dissociation was determined usin competition assays. An excess of unlabelle oligonucleotide that contained the UL9 binding site wa added to each reaction. This unlabelled oligonucleotid acts as a specific inhibitor, capturing the UL9 protein a it dissociates from the labelled oligonucleotide (Exampl 4B) . The dissociation rate, as determined by a band-sh assay, for both full length UL9 and UL9-COOH approximately 4 hours at 4 β C or approximately 10 minutes room temperature. Neither non-specific oligonucleotides 10,000-fold excess) nor sheared herring sperm DNA 100,000-fold excess) competed for binding with oligonucleotide containing the UL9 binding site. F. oriS Flanking Sequence Variation. As mentioned above, one feature of a DNA:protei binding system for use in the assay of the prese invention is that the DNA:protein interaction is n affected by the nucleotide sequence of the regions adjace the DNA-binding site. The sensitivity of any DNA:protei binding reaction to the composition of the flanki sequences can be evaluated by the functional binding ass and dissociation assay described above. To test the effect of flanking sequence variation UL9 binding to the oriS SEQ ID NO:l sequenc oligonucleotides were constructed with 20-30 differe sequences (i.e., the test sequences) flanking the 5' and sides of the UL9 binding site. Further, oligonucleotid were constructed with point mutations at several positio within the UL9 binding site. Most point mutations with the binding site destroyed recognition. Several chang did not destroy recognition and these include variations sites that differ between the three UL9 binding sites (S ID NO:l, SEQ ID NO:2 and SEQ ID NO:17): the second U binding site (SEQ ID NO:2) shows a ten-fold decrease UL9:DNA binding affinity (Elias et al.) relative to t first (SEQ ID NO:l) . On the other hand, sequence variati at the test site (also called the test sequence) , adjace to the screening site (Figure 5, Example 5), had virtual no effect on binding or the rate of dissociation. The results demonstrating that the nucleotide sequenc in the test site, which flanks the screening site, has effect on the kinetics of UL9 binding in any of t oligonucleotides tested is a striking result. This allo the direct comparison of the effect of a DNA-bindi molecule on test oligonucleotides that contain differe test sequences. Since the only difference between te oligonucleotides is the difference in nucleotide sequen at the test site(s) , and since the nucleotide sequence the test site has no effect on UL9 binding, a differential effect observed between the two te oligonucleotides in response to a DNA-binding molecule mu be due solely to the differential interaction of the DN binding molecule with the test sequence(s) . In th manner, the insensitivity of UL9 to the test sequenc flanking the UL9 binding site greatly facilitates t interpretation of results. Each test oligonucleotide ac as a control sample for all other test oligonucleotides This is particularly true when ordered sets of tes sequences are tested (eg., testing all 256 four base pai sequences (Figure 13) for binding to a single drug) . Taken together the above experiments support that t UL9-COOH polypeptide binds the SEQ ID NO:l sequence wit (i) appropriate strength, (ii) an acceptable dissociatio time, and (iii) indifference to the nucleotide sequence flanking the assay (binding) site. These feature suggested that the UL9 /oriS system could provide versatile assay for detection of small molecule/DNA-bindin involving any number of specific nucleotide sequences. The above-described experiment can be used to scree other DNA:protein interactions to determine thei usefulness in the present assay. G. Small Molecules as Sequence-Specific Competitiv Inhibitors. To test the utility of the present assay syste several small molecules that have sequence preferenc (e.g., a preference for AT-rich versus GC-rich sequences have been tested. Distamycin A binds relatively weakly to DNA (K A = 2 10 s M" 1 ) with a preference for non-alternating AT-ric sequences (Jain et al.; Sobell; Sobell et al.) Actinomycin D binds DNA more strongly (K A = 7.6 x 10" 7 M *1 than Distamycin A and has a relatively strong preferenc for the dinucleotide sequence dGdC (Luck et al.; Zimmer Wartel) . Each of these molecules poses a stringent tes for the assay. Distamycin A tests the sensitivity of th assay because of its relatively weak binding. Actinomyci D challenges the ability to utilize flanking sequence since the UL9 recognition sequence contains a dGd dinucleotide: therefore, it might be anticipated that al of the oligonucleotides, regardless of the test sequenc flanking the assay site, might be equally affected b actinomycin D. In addition, Doxorubicin, a known anti-cancer agen that binds DNA in a sequence-preferential manner (Chen, K X, et al.), has been tested for preferential DNA sequenc binding using the assay of the present invention. Actinomycin D, Distamycin A, and Doxorubicin have bee tested for their ability to preferentially inhibit th binding of UL9 to oligonucleotides containing differen sequences flanking the UL9 binding site (Example 6, Figur 5) . Binding assays were performed as described in Exampl 5. These studies were completed under conditions in whic UL9 is in excess of the DNA (i.e., most of the DNA is i complex) . Distamycin A was tested with 5 different tes sequences flanking the UL9 screening sequence: SEQ ID NO:5 to SEQ ID NO:9. The results shown in Figure 10A demonstrate that distamycin A preferentially disrupts binding to the test sequences UL9 polyT, UL9 polyA and, t a lesser extent, UL9 ATAT. Figure 10A also shows th concentration dependence of the inhibitory effect o distamycin A: at 1 μM distamycin A most of the DNA:protei complexes are intact (top band) with free probe appearin in the UL9 polyT and UL9 polyA lanes, and some free prob appearing in the UL9 ATAT lane; at 4 μM free probe can b seen in the UL9 polyT and UL9 polyA lanes; at 16 μM fre probe can be seen in the UL9 polyT and UL9 polyA lanes; an at 40 μM the DNA:protein in the polyT, UL9 polyA and UL ATAT lanes are near completely disrupted while som DNA:protein complexes in the other lanes persist. Thes results are consistent with Distamycin A's known bindin preference for non-alternating AT-rich sequences. Actinomycin D was tested with 8 different tes sequences flanking the UL9 screening sequence: SEQ ID NO: to SEQ ID NO:9, and SEQ ID NO:11 to SEQ ID NO:13. Th results shown in Figure 10B demonstrate that actinomycin preferentially disrupts the binding of UL9-C00H to th oligonucleotides UL9 CCCG (SEQ ID NO:5) and UL9 GGGC (SE ID NO:6). These oligonucleotides contain, respectively three or five dGdC dinucleotides in addition to the dGd dinucleotide within the UL9 recognition sequence. Thi result is consistent with Actinomycin D's known bindin preference for the dinucleotide sequence dGdC Apparentl the presence of a potential target site within th screening sequence (oriS, SEQ ID NO:l), as mentioned above does not interfere with the function of the assay. Doxorubicin was tested with 8 different test sequence flanking the UL9 screening sequence: SEQ ID NO:5 to SEQ I NO:9, and SEQ ID NO:11 to SEQ ID NO:13. The results show in Figure 10C demonstrate that Doxorubicin preferentiall disrupts binding to oriEco3, the test sequence of whic differs from oriEco2 by only one base (compare SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:13). Figure 10C also shows the concentratio dependence of the inhibitory effect of Doxorubicin: at μM Doxorubicin, the UL9 binding to the screening sequen is strongly affected when oriEco3 is the test sequence, a more mildly affected when polyT, UL9 GGGC, or oriEco2 w the test sequence; and at 35 μM Doxorubicin mos DNA:protein complexes are nearly completely disrupted, wit UL9 polyT and UL9ATAT showing some DNA still complexed wit protein. Also, effects similar to those observed at 15 μ were also observed using Doxorubicin at 150 nM, but at later time point. Further incubation with any of the drugs resulted i additional disruption of binding. Given that the one hou incubation time of the above assays is equivalent t several half-lives of the DNA:protein complex, th additional disruption of binding suggests that the on-rat for the drugs is comparatively slow. The ability of the assay to distinguish sequenc binding preference using weak DNA-binding molecules wit poor sequence-specificity (such as distamycin A) is stringent test. Accordingly, the present assay seems well suited for the identification of molecules having bette sequence specificity and/or higher sequence bindin affinity. Further, the results demonstrate sequenc preferential binding with the known anti-cancer dru Doxorubicin. This result indicates the assay may be usefu for screening mixtures for molecules displaying simila characteristics that could be subsequently tested for anti cancer activities as well as sequence-specific binding. Other compounds that may be suitable for testing th present DNA:protein system or for defining alternat DNA:protein systems include the following: echinomycin, which preferentially binds to the sequence (A/T)CG (Quigley et al.); small inorganic molecules, such a cobalt hexamine, that are known to induce Z-DNA formatio in regions that contain repetitive GC sequences (Gessner e al.); and other DNA-binding proteins, such as EcoRl, restriction endonuclease. H. Theoretical considerations on the concentration o assay components. There are two components in the assay, the tes sequence (oligonucleotide) and the DNA-binding domain o UL9, which is described below. A number of theoretica considerations have been employed in establishing the assa system of the present invention. In one embodiment of th invention, the assay is used as a mass-screening assay. I this capacity, small volumes and concentrations wer desirable. A typical assay uses about 0.1 ng DNA in a 15 20 μl reaction volume (approximately 0.3 nM) . The protei concentration is in excess and can be varied to increase o decrease the sensitivity of the assay. In the simples scenario, where the small molecule is acting as competitive inhibitor via steric hindrance, the syste kinetics can be described by the following equations: D + P ■ «* D:P, where ^ = ^ - [D:P]/[D][P] and D + X * » D:X, where k ft /k bx = K^- = [D:X]/[D][X] D -= DNA, P ■ = protein, X = DNA-binding molecule, k and k ft are the rates of the forward reaction for the DNA:protein interaction and DNA:drug interaction, respectively, and k^ and k bx are the rates of the backwards reactions for the respective interactions. Brackets, [] , indicate molar concentration of the components. In the assay, both the protein, P, and the DNA-bindi molecule or drug, X, are competing for the DNA. If ster hindrance is the mechanism of inhibition, the assumpti can be made that the two molecules are competing for t same site. When the concentration of DNA equals t concentration of the DNA:drug or DNA:protein complex, t equilibrium binding constant, K^,, is equal to t reciprocal of the protein concentration (1/[P]). For UL the calculated = 2.2 x 10 9 M "1 . When all thr components are mixed together, the relationship between t drug and the protein can be described as: Keq.p = Z ( K eq.χ) where "z" defines the difference in affinity for the DN between P and X. For example, if z =4, then the affinit of the drug is -fold lower than the affinity of th protein for the DNA molecule. The concentration of X therefore, must be 4-fold greater than the concentration o P, to compete equally for the DNA molecule. Thus, th equilibrium affinity constant of UL9 will define th minimum level of detection with respect to th concentration and/or affinity of the drug. Low affinit DNA-binding molecules will be detected only at hig concentrations; likewise, high affinity molecules can b detected at relatively low concentrations. With certain test sequences, complete inhibition o UL9 binding at markedly lower concentrations than indicate by these analyses have been observed, probably indicatin that certain sites among those chosen for feasibilit studies have affinities higher than previously published Note that relatively high concentrations of known drugs ca be utilized for testing sequence specificity. In addition the binding constant of UL9 can be readily lowered b altering the pH or salt concentration in the assay if it i desirable to screen for molecules that are found at lo concentration (eg., in a fermentation broth or extract). Analyses such as presented above, become more comple if the inhibition is allosteric (non-competitiv inhibition) rather than competition by steric hindrance. Nonetheless, the probability that the relative effect of a inhibitor on different test sequences is due to it relative and differential affinity to the different tes sequences is fairly high. This is particularly true in th assays in which all sequences within an ordered set (eg., possible sequences of a given length or all possibl variations of a certain base composition and define length) are tested. In brief, if the effect of inhibitio in the assay is particularly strong for a single sequence, then it is likely that the inhibitor binds that particula sequence with higher affinity than any of the othe sequences. Furthermore, while it may be difficult t determine the absolute affinity of the inhibitor, the relative affinities have a high probability of bein reasonably accurate. This information will be most useful in facilitating, for instance, the refinement of molecula modeling systems. I. The use of the assay under conditions of hig protein concentration. When the screening protein is added to the assa system at very high concentrations, the protein binds t non-specific sites on the oligonucleotide in addition t the screening sequence. This effect has been demonstrate using band shift gels: in particular, when serial dilutions are made of the UL-9 protein and the dilutions are mixe with a fixed concentration of oligonucleotide, no bindin (as seen by a band shift) is observed at very low dilutions (e.g., 1:100,000), a single band shift is observed a moderate dilutions (e.g., 1:100) and a smear, migratin higher than the single band observed at moderat dilutions, is observed at high concentrations of protei (e.g., 1:10). In the band shift assay, a smear i indicative of a mixed population of complexes, all of whic presumably have the screening protein binding to th screening sequence with high affinity (e.g., for UL9, K 2 1.1 x 10 9 M *1 ) but in addition have a larger number o proteins bound with markedly lower affinity. Some of the low affinity binding proteins are bound t the test sequence. In experiments performed in support o the present invention, using mixtures of UL9 an glutathione-S-transferase, the low affinity bindin proteins are likely UL9 or, less likely, glutathione-S transferase, since these are the only proteins in the assa mixture. These low affinity binding proteins ar significantly more sensitive to interference by a molecul binding to the test sequence for two reasons. First, th interference is likely to be by direct steric hinderanc and does not rely on induced conformational changes in th DNA; secondly, the protein binding to the test site is low affinity binding protein because the test site is no a cognate-binding sequence. In the case of UL9, th difference in affinity between the low affinity binding an the high affinity binding appears to be at least two order of magnitude. Experiments performed in support of the presen invention demonstrate that the filter binding assay capture more DNA:protein complexes when more protein i bound to the DNA. The relative results are accurate, bu under moderate protein concentrations, not all of the boun DNA (as demonstrated by band shift assays) will bind to th filter unless there is more than one DNA:protein comple per oligonucleotide (e.g., in the case of UL9, more than one UL9:DNA complex). This makes the assay exquisitely sensitive under conditions of high protein concentration For instance, when actinomycin binds DNA at a test sit under conditions where there is one DNA:UL9 complex pe oligonucleotide, a differential-binding effect on GC-ric oligonucleotides has been observed (see Example 6) . Unde conditions of high protein concentration, where more tha one DNA:UL9 complex is found per oligonucleotide, th differential effect of actinomycin D is even more marked These results suggest that the effect of actinomycin D o a test site that is weakly bound by protein may be mor readily detected than the effect of actinomycin D on th adjacent screening sequence. Therefore, employing hig protein concentrations may increase the sensitivity of th assay. II. Capture/Detection Systems. As an alternative to the above described band shif gels and filter binding assays, the measurement o inhibitors can be monitored by measuring either the leve of unbound DNA in the presence of test molecules o mixtures or the level of DNA:protein complex remaining i the presence of test molecules or mixtures. Measurement may be made either at equilibrium or in a kinetic assay prior to the time at which equilibrium is reached. Th type of measurement is likely to be dictated by practica factors, such as the length of time to equilibrium, whic will be determined by both the kinetics of the DNA:protei interaction as well as the kinetics of the DNA:dru interaction. The results (ie., the detection of DNA binding molecules and/or the determination of thei sequence preferences) should not vary with the type o measurement taken (kinetic or equilibrium) . Figure 2 illustrates an assay for detecting inhibitor molecules based on their ability to preferentially hinde the binding of a DNA-binding protein. In the presence o an inhibitory molecule (X) the equilibrium between the DNA binding protein and its binding site (screening sequence is disrupted. The DNA-binding protein (O) is displace from DNA (/) in the presence of inhibitor (X) , the DNA fre of protein or, alternatively, the DNA:protein complexes can then be captured and detected. For maximum sensitivity, unbound DNA and DNA:protei complexes should be sequestered from each other in a efficient and rapid manner. The method of DNA captur should allow for the rapid removal of the unbound DNA fro he protein-rich mixture containing the DNA:protei complexes. Even if the test molecules are specific in thei interaction with DNA they may have relatively low affinit and they may also be weak binders of non-specific DNA o have non-specific interactions with DNA at lo concentrations. In either case, their binding to DNA ma only be transient, much like the transient binding of the protein in solution. Accordingly, one feature of the assay is to take a molecular snapshot of the equilibrium state of a solution comprised of the target/assay DNA, the protein, and the inhibitory test molecule. In the presence of an inhibitor, the amount of DNA that is not bound to protein will be greater than in the absence of an inhibitor. Likewise, in the presence of an inhibitor, the amount of DNA that is bound to protein will be lesser than in the absence of an inhibitor. Any method used to separate the DNA:protein complexes from unbound DNA, should be rapid, because when the capture system is applied to the solution (if the capture system is irreversible) , the ratio of unbound DNA to DNA:protein complex will change at a predetermined rate, based purely on the off-rate of the DNA:protein complex. This step, therefore, determines the limits of background. Unlike the protein and inhibitor, the capture system should bind rapidly and tightly to the DNA or DNA:protein complex. The longer the capture syste is left in contact with the entire mixture of unbound DN and DNA:protein complexes in solution, the higher th background, regardless of the presence or absence o inhibitor. Two exemplary capture systems are described below fo use in the present assay. One capture system has bee devised to capture unbound DNA (part II.A). The other ha been devised to capture DNA:protein complexes (part II.B) . Both systems are amenable to high throughput screenin assays. The same detection methods can be applied t molecules captured using either capture system (part II.C) A. Capture of unbound DNA. One capture system that has been developed in th course of experiments performed in support of the presen invention utilizes a streptavidin/biotin interaction fo the rapid capture of unbound DNA from the protein-ric mixture, which includes unbound DNA, DNA:protein complexes, excess protein and the test molecules or test mixtures. Streptavidin binds with extremely high affinity to bioti (K,, = 10 *1S M) (Chaiet et al.; Green), thus two advantages o the streptavidin/biotin system are that binding between th two molecules can be rapid and the interaction is th strongest known non-covalent interaction. In this detection system a biotin molecule i covalently attached in the oligonucleotide screenin sequence (i.e., the DNA-binding protein's binding site). This attachment is accomplished in such a manner that th binding of the DNA-binding protein to the DNA is no destroyed. Further, when the protein is bound to th biotinylated sequence, the protein prevents the binding o streptavidin to the biotin. In other words, the DNA binding protein is able to protect the biotin from bein recognized by the streptavidin. This DNA:protei interaction is illustrated in Figure 3. The capture system is described herein for use wi the UL9 /oriS system described above. The following gener testing principles can, however, be applied to analysis o other DNA:protein interactions. The usefulness of thi system depends on the biophysical characteristics of th particular DNA:protein interaction. 1) Modification of the protein recognitio sequence with biotin. The recognition sequence for the binding of the UL (Koff et al.) protein is underlined in Figure 4 Oligonucleotides were synthesized that contain the UL binding site and site-specifically biotinylated a number o locations throughout the binding sequence (SEQ ID NO:14 Example 1, Figure 4) . These biotinylated oligonucleotide were then used in band shift assays to determine th ability of the UL9 protein to bind to the oligonucleotide These experiments using the biotinylated probe and a non biotinylated probe as a control demonstrate that th presence of a biotin at the #8-T (biotinylate deoxyuridine) position of the bottom strand meets th requirements listed above: the presence of a biotin moiet at the #8 position of the bottom strand does not markedl affect the specificity of UL9 for the recognition site further, in the presence of bound UL9, streptavidin doe not recognize the presence of the biotin moiety in th oligonucleotide. Biotinylation at other A or T position did not have the two necessary characteristics (i.e., UL binding and protection from streptavidin) : biotinylatio at the adenosine in position #8, of the top strand, prevented the binding of UL9; biotinylation of eithe adenosines or thymidines (top or bottom strand) a positions #3, #4, #10, or #11 all allowed binding of UL9, but in each case, streptavidin also was able to recognis the presence of the biotin moiety and thereby bind th oligonucleotide in the presence of UL9. The above result (the ability of UL9 to bind to a oligonucleotide containing a biotin within the recognitio sequence and to protect the biotin from streptavidin) wa unexpected in that methylation interference data (Koff e al.) suggest that methylation of the deoxyguanosin residues at positions #7 and #9 of the recognition sequenc (on either side of the biotinylated deoxyuridine) block UL9 binding. In these methylation interferenc experiments, guanosines are methylated by dimethyl sulfat at the N 7 position, which corresponds structurally to the 5 position of the pyrimidine ring at which the deoxyuridin is biotinylated. These moieties all protrude into th major groove of the DNA. The methylation interference dat suggest that the #7 and #9 position deoxyguanosines ar contact points for UL9, it was therefore unexpected tha the presence of a biotin moiety between them would no interfere with binding. The binding of the full length protein was relativel unaffected by the presence of a biotin at position # within the UL9 binding site. The rate of dissociation wa similar for full length UL9 with both biotinylated and un biotinylated oligonucleotides. However, the rate o dissociation of the truncated UL9-COOH polypeptide wa faster with the biotinylated oligonucleotides than wit non-biotinylated oligonucleotides, which is a rat comparable to that of the full length protein with eithe DNA. The binding conditions were optimized for UL9-COOH s that the off-rate of the truncated UL9 from th biotinylated oligonucleotide was 5-10 minutes (optimize conditions are given in Example 4) , a rate compatible wit a mass screening assay. The use of multi-well plates t conduct the DNA:protein assay of the present invention i one approach to mass screening. 2) Capture of site-specific biotinylat oligonucleotides. The streptavidin:biotin interaction can be employed several different ways to remove unbound DNA from t solution containing the DNA, protein, and test molecule mixture. Magnetic polystyrene or agarose beads, to whic streptavidin is covalently attached or attached through covalently attached biotin, can be exposed to the solutio for a brief period, then removed by use, respectively, o magnets or a filter mesh. Magnetic streptavidinated bead are currently the method of choice. Streptavidin has bee used in many of these experiments, but avidin is equall useful. An example of a second method for the removal o unbound DNA is to attach streptavidin to a filter by firs linking biotin to the filter, binding streptavidin, the blocking nonspecific protein binding sites on the filte with a nonspecific protein such as albumin. The mixture i then passed through the filter, unbound DNA is captured an the bound DNA passes through the filter. One convenient method to sequester captured DNA is th use of streptavidin-conjugated superparamagneti polystyrene beads as described in Example 7. These bead are added to the assay mixture to capture the unbound DNA After capture of DNA, the beads can be retrieved by placin the reaction tubes in a magnetic rack, which sequesters th beads on the reaction chamber wall while the assay mixtur is removed and the beads are washed. The captured DNA i then detected using one of several DNA detection systems as described below. Alternatively, avidin-coated agarose beads can b used. Biotinylated agarose beads (immobilized D-biotin, Pierce) are bound to avidin. Avidin, like streptavidin, has four binding sites for biotin. One of these bindin sites is used to bind the avidin to the biotin that i coupled to the agarose beads via a 16 atom spacer arm: th other biotin binding sites remain available. The beads ar mixed with binding mixtures to capture biotinylated DN (Example 7). Alternative methods (Harlow et al.) to th bead capture methods just described include the followin streptavidinated or avidinated supports: low-protein binding filters or 96-well plates. B) Capture of DNA:protein complexes. The amount of DNA:protein complex remaining in th assay mixture in the presence of an inhibitory molecule ca also be determined as a measure of the relative effect o the inhibitory molecule. A net decrease in the amount o DNA:protein complex in response to a test molecule is a indication of the presence of an inhibitor. DNA molecules that are bound to protein can be captured on nitrocellulose filters. Under low salt conditions, DNA that is not bound to protein freely passes through the filter. Thus, by passing the assay mixture rapidly through a nitrocellulose filter, the DNA:protein complexes and unbound DNA molecules can be rapidly separated. This has been accomplished on nitrocellulose discs using a vacuum filter apparatus or on slot blot or dot blot apparatuses (all of which are available from Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH) . The assay mixture is applied to and rapidly passes through th wetted nitrocellulose under vacuum conditions. An apparatus employing nitrocellulose filters or other filters capable of retaining protein while allowing free DNA to pass through the filter are suitable for this system. C) Detection systems. For either of the above capture methods, the amount of DNA that has been captured is quantitated. The method of quantitation depends on how the DNA has been prepared. If the DNA is radioactively labelled, beads can be counted in a scintillation counter, or autoradiographs can be taken of dried gels or nitrocellulose filters. The amount of D has been quantitated in the latter case by a densitomete (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) ; alternatively filters or gels containing radiolabeled samples can b quantitated using a phosphoimager (Molecular Dynamics) The captured DNA may be also be detected using chemiluminescent or colorimetric detection system. Radiolabelling and chemiluminescence (i) are ver sensitive, allowing the detection of sub-femtomol quantities of oligonucleotide, and (ii) use well established techniques. In the case of chemiluminescen detection, protocols have been devised to accommodate th requirements of a mass-screening assay. Non-isotopic DN detection techniques have principally incorporated alkalin phosphatase as the detectable label given the ability o the enzyme to give a high turnover of substrate to produc and the availability of substrates that yiel chemiluminescent or colored products. 1) Radioactive labeling. Many of the experiments described above for UL DNA:protein-binding studies have made use of radio-labelle oligonucleotides. The techniques involved i radiolabelling of oligonucleotides have been discusse above. A specific activity of 10 8 -10 9 dpm per μg DNA i routinely achieved using standard methods (eg., end labeling the oligonucleotide with adenosine γ-[ 32 P]-5' triphosphate and T4 polynucleotide kinase) . This level o specific activity allows small amounts of DNA to b measured either by autoradiography of gels or filter exposed to film or by direct counting of samples i scintillation fluid. 2) Chemiluminescent detection. For chemiluminescent detection, digoxigenin-labelle oligonucleotides (Example 1) can be detected using the chemiluminescent detection system "SOUTHERN LIGHTS, developed by Tropix, Inc. The detection system i diagrammed in Figures 11A and 11B. The technique can b applied to detect DNA that has been captured on eithe beads, filters, or in solution. Alkaline phosphatase is coupled to the captured DN without interfering with the capture system. To do thi several methods, derived from commonly used ELISA (Harlo et al.; Pierce, Rockford IL) techniques, can be employed For example, an antigenic moiety is incorporated into th DNA at sites that will not interfere with (i) th DNA:protein interaction, (ii) the DNA:drug interaction, o (iii) the capture system. In the UL9 DNA:protein/bioti system the DNA has been end-labelled with digoxigenin-11 dUTP (dig-dUTP) and terminal transferase (Example 1, Figur 4) . After the DNA was captured and removed from th DNA:protein mixture, an anti-digoxigenin-alkalin phosphatase conjugated antibody was then reacte (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis IN) with th digoxigenin-containing oligonucleotide. The antigeni digoxigenin moiety was recognized by the antibody-enzym conjugate. The presence of dig-dUTP altered neither th ability of UL9-C00H protein to bind the oriS SEQ ID NO:l containing DNA nor the ability of streptavidin to bind th incorporated biotin. Captured DNA was detected using the alkalin phosphatase-conjugated antibodies to digoxigenin a follows. One chemiluminescent substrate for alkalin phosphatase is 3-(2'-spiroadamantane)-4-methoxy-4-(3" phosphoryloxy) phenyl-l,2-dioxetane disodium salt (AMPPD) (Example 7) . Dephosphorylation of AMPPD results in a unstable compound, which decomposes, releasing a prolonged, steady emission of light at 477 nm. Light measurement i very sensitive and can detect minute quantities of DN (e.g., 10 2 -10 3 attomoles) (Example 7). Colorimetric substrates for the alkaline phosphatas system have also been tested and are useable in the presen assay system. An alternative to the above biotin capture system i to use digoxigenin in place of biotin to modify th oligonucleotide at a site protected by the DNA-bindin protein at the assay site: biotin is then used to replac the digoxigenin moieties in the above described detectio system. In this arrangement the anti-digoxigenin antibod is used to capture the oligonucleotide probe when it i free of bound protein. Streptavidin conjugated to alkalin phosphatase is then used to detect the presence of capture oligonucleotides. D) Alternative methods for detecting molecules tha increase the affinity of the DNA-binding protein for it cognate site. In addition to identifying molecules or compounds tha cause a decreased affinity of the DNA-binding protein fo the screening sequence, molecules may be identified tha increase the affinity of the protein for its cognat binding site. In this case, leaving the capture system fo unbound DNA in contact with the assay for increasin amounts of time allows the establishment of a fixed off rate for the DNA:protein interaction (for example SEQ ID N0:1/UL9). In the presence of a stabilizing molecule, the off-rate, as detected by the capture system time points, will be decreased. Using the capture system for DNA:protein complexes to detect molecules that increase the affinity of the DNA- binding protein for the screening sequence requires that an excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide containing the UL9 binding site (but not the test sequences) is added to the assay mixture. This is, in effect, an off-rate experiment. In this case, the control sample (no test molecules o mixtures added) will show a fixed off-rate (ie., sample would be taken at fixed intervals after the addition of th unlabeled competition DNA molecule, applied t nitrocellulose, and a decreasing amount of radiolabele DNA:protein complex would be observed) . In the presence o a DNA-binding test molecule that enhanced the binding o UL9, the off-rate would be decreased (ie., the amount o radiolabeled DNA:protein complexes observed would no decrease as rapidly at the fixed time points as in th control sample) . III. Utility A. The Usefulness of Sequence-Specific DNA-Bindin Molecules. The present invention defines a high through-put i vitro screening assay to test large libraries of biologica or chemical mixtures for the presence of DNA-bindin molecules having sequence binding preference. The assay i also capable of determining the sequence-specificity an relative affinity of known DNA-binding molecules o purified unknown DNA-binding molecules. Sequence-specifi DNA-binding molecules are of particular interest fo several reasons, which are listed here. These reasons, i part, outline the rationale for determining the usefulnes of DNA-binding molecules as therapeutic agents: 1) Generally, for a given DNA:protein interaction, there are several thousands fewer target DNA-bindin sequences per cell than protein molecules that bind to th DNA. Accordingly, even fairly toxic molecules might b delivered in sufficiently low concentration to exert biological effect by binding to the target DNA sequences. 2) DNA has a relatively more well-defined structur compared to RNA or protein. Since the general structure o DNA has less tertiary structural variation, identifying o designing specific binding molecules should be easier f DNA than for either RNA or protein. Double-stranded DNA a repeating structure of deoxyribonucleotides that sta atop one another to form a linear helical structure. this manner, DNA has a regularly repeating "lattic structure that makes it particularly amenable to molecul modeling refinements and hence, drug design an development. 3) Many "single-copy" genes (of which there are onl 1 or 2 copies in the cell) are transcribed into multiple potentially thousands, of RNA molecules, each of which ma be translated into many proteins. Accordingly, targetin any DNA site, whether it is a regulatory sequence or coding or noncoding sequence, may require a much lower dru dose than targeting RNAs or proteins. Proteins (e.g., enzymes, receptors, or structura proteins) are currently the targets of most therapeuti agents. More recently, RNA molecules have become th targets for antisense or ribozyme therapeutic molecules. 4) Blocking the function of a RNA, which encodes protein, or of a corresponding protein, when that protei regulates several cellular genes, may have detrimenta effects: particularly if some of the regulated genes ar important for the survival of the cell. However, blockin a DNA-binding site that is specific to a single gen regulated by such a protein results in reduced toxicity. An example situation (4) is HNF-1 binding to Hepatiti B virus (HBV) : HNF-1 binds an HBV enhancer sequence an stimulates transcription of HBV genes (Chang et al.). I a normal cell HNF-1 is a nuclear protein that appears to b important for the regulation of many genes, particularl liver-specific genes (Courtois et al.). If molecules wer isolated that specifically bound to the DNA-binding domai of HNF-l, all of the genes regulated by HNF-1 would b down-regulated, including both viral and cellular genes. Such a drug could be lethal since many of the gene regulated by HNF-l may be necessary for liver function However, the assay of the present invention presents th ability to screen for a molecule that could distinguish th HNF-l binding region of the Hepatitis B virus DNA fro cellular HNF-l sites by, for example, including divergen flanking sequences when screening for the molecule. Suc a molecule would specifically block HBV expression withou effecting cellular gene expression. B. General Applications of the Assay. General applications of the assay include but are no limited to screening libraries of uncharacterized compound (e.g., biological, chemical or synthetic compounds) fo sequence-specific DNA-binding molecules (part III.B.l) determining the sequence-specificity or preference and/o relative affinities of DNA-binding molecules (par III.B.2); and testing of modified derivatives of DNA binding molecules for altered specificity or affinit (part III.B.3). In particular, since each test compound i screened against up to 4 N sequences, where N is the numbe of basepairs in the test sequence, the method will generat up to 4 N structure/activity data points for analysing th relationship between compound structure and bindin activity, as evidenced by protein binding to an adjacen sequence. 1) Mass-screening of libraries for the presenc of sequence-specific DNA-binding molecules. Many organizations (eg. , the National Institutes o Health, pharmaceutical and chemical corporations) hav large libraries of chemical or biological compounds fro synthetic processes, fermentation broths or extracts tha may contain as yet unidentified DNA-binding molecules. On utility of the assay of the present invention is to appl the assay system to the mass-screening of these librarie of different broths, extracts, or mixtures to detect th specific samples that contain the DNA-binding molecules. Once the specific mixtures that contain the DNA-bindin molecules have been identified, the assay has a furthe usefulness in aiding in the purification of the DNA-bindin molecule from the crude mixture. As purificaiton schemes are applied to the mixture, the assay can be used to test the fractions for DNA-binding activity. The assay is amenable to high throughput (eg., a 96-well plate format automated on robotics equipment such as a Beckman Biomek workstation [Beckman, Palo Alto, CA] with detection using semiautomated plate-reading densitometers, luminometers, or phosphoimagers) . 2) The assay of the present invention is also useful for screening molecules that are currently described in the literature as DNA-binding molecules but which have uncertain DNA-binding sequence specificity (ie., having either no well-defined preference for binding to specific DNA sequences or having certain higher affinity binding sites but without defining the relative preference for all possible DNA binding sequences) . The assay can be used to determine the specific binding sites for DNA-binding molecules, among all possible choices of sequence that bind with high, low, or moderate affinity to the DNA-binding molecule. Actinomycin D, Distamycin A, and Doxorubicin (Example 6) all provide examples of molecules with these modes of binding. Many anti-cancer drugs, such as Doxorubicin (see Example 6) show binding preference for certain identified DNA sequences, although the absolute highest and lowest specificity sequences have yet to be determined, because, until the invention described herein, the methods (Salas, X. and Portugal, J. ; Cullinane, C and Phillips, D.R. ; Phillips, D.R.,; and Phillips, D.R. et al.) for detecting differential affinity DNA-binding sites for any drug were limited. Doxorubicin is one of the most widely used anti-cancer drugs currently available. A shown in Example 6, Doxorubicin is known to bind som sequences preferentially. Another example of such sequenc binding preference is Daunorubicin (Chen et al.) tha differs slightly in structure from Doxorubicin (Goodman e al.) . Both Daunorubicin and Doxorubicin are members of th anthracycline antibiotic family: antibiotics in thi family, and their derivatives, are important antitumo agents (Goodman et al.). The assay of the present invention allows the sequenc preferences or specificities of DNA-binding molecules to b determined. The DNA-binding molecules for which sequenc preference or specificity can be determined may includ small molecules such as aminoacridines and polycycli hydrocarbons, planar dyes, various DNA-binding antibiotic and anticancer drugs, as well as DNA-binding macromolecule such as peptides and polymers that bind to nucleic acid (eg, DNA and the derivatized homologs of DNA that bind t the DNA helix) . The molecules that can be tested in the assay fo sequence preference/specificity and relative affinity t different DNA sites include both major and minor groov binders as well as intercalating and non-intercalating DN binders. 3) The assay of the present invention facilitates th identification of different binding activities by molecule derived from known DNA-binding molecules. An example woul be to identify derivatives and test these derivatives fo DNA-binding activity using the assay of the presen invention. Derivatives having DNA-binding activity ar then tested for anti-cancer activity through, for example a battery of assays performed by the National Cance Institute (Bethesda MD) . Further, the assay of the presen invention can be used to test derivatives of known anti cancer agents to examine the effect of the modification (such as methylation, ethylation and other derivatizations on DNA-binding activity and specificity. The assa provides (i) an initial screen for the design of bette therapeutic derivatives of known agents and (ii) a metho to provide a better understanding of the mode of action o such therapeutic derivatives. 4) The screening capacity of this assay is muc greater than screening each separate DNA sequence with a individual cognate DNA-binding protein. While direc competition assays involving individual receptor:ligan complexes (eg., a specific DNA: rotein complex) are mos commonly used for mass screening efforts, each assa requires the identification, isolation, purification, an production of the assay components. Using the assay of th present invention, libraries of synthetic chemicals o biological molecules can be screened for detectin molecules that have preferential binding to virtually an specified DNA sequence using a single assay system. Secondary screens involving the specific DNA:protei interaction may not be necessary, since inhibitor molecules detected in the assay may be tested directly o a biological system (eg. , the ability to disrupt vira replication in a tissue culture or animal model) . C. Sequences Targeted by the Assay. The DNA:protein assay of the present invention ha been designed to screen for compounds that bind a ful range of DNA sequences that vary in length as well as complexity. Sequence-specific DNA-binding molecules discovered by the assay have potential usefulness as either molecular reagents, therapeutics, or therapeutic precursors. Table I lists several potential specific test sequences. Sequence-specific DNA-binding molecules are potentially powerful therapeutics for essentially any disease or condition that in some way involves DNA. Examples of test sequences for the assay include: binding sequences of factors involved in the maintenance propagation of infectious agents, especially viruse bacteria, yeast and other fungi, b) sequences causing t inappropriate expression of certain cellular genes, and sequences involved in the replication of rapidly growi cells. Furthermore, gene expression or replication does n necessarily need to be disrupted by blocking the binding specific proteins. Specific sequences within codi regions of genes (e.g., oncogenes) are equally valid te sequences since the binding of small molecules to the sequences is likely to perturb the transcription and/ replication of the region. Finally, any molecules th bind DNA with some sequence specificity, that is, not ju to one particular test sequence, may be still be useful anti-cancer agents. Several small molecules with so sequence preference are already in use as anticanc therapeutics. Molecules identified by the present ass may be particularly valuable as lead compounds for t development of congeners (i.e., chemical derivatives of molecule having differenct specificities) with eith different specificity or different affinity. One advantage of the present invention is that t assay is capable of screening for binding activity direct against any DNA sequence. Such sequences can be medicall significant target sequences (see part 1, Medical Significant Target Sites, in this section) , scrambled randomly generated DNA sequences, or well-defined, order sets of DNA sequences (see part 2, Ordered Sets of Tes Sequences, in this section) , which could be used fo screening for molecules demonstrating sequence preferenti binding (like Doxorubicin) to determine the sequences wit highest binding affinity and/or to determine the relati relative affinities between a large number of differe sequences. There is usefulness in taking either approa for detecting and/or designing new therapeutic agent Part 3 of this section. Theoretical Considerations f Choosing Target Sequences, outlines the theoretic considerations for choosing DNA target sites in biological system. 1) Medically significant target sequences. Few effective viral therapeutics are current available; yet several potential target sequences f antiviral DNA-binding drugs have been well-characterize Furthermore, with the accumulation of sequence data on a biological systems, including viral genomes, cellul genomes, pathogen genomes (bacteria, fungi, eukaryoti parasites, etc.), the number of target sites for DN binding drugs will increase greatly in the future Medically significant target sites can be defined as shor DNA sequences (approximately 4-30 base pairs) that ar required for the expression replication of geneti material. For example, sequences that bind regulator factors, either transcriptional or replicatory factors would be ideal target sites for altering gene or vira expression. Secondly, coding sequences may be adequat target sites for disrupting gene function. Thirdly, eve non-coding, non-regulatory sequences may be of interest a target sites (e.g., for disrupting replication processes o introducing an increased mutational frequency. Som specific examples of medically significant target sites ar shown in Table 1. TABLE I. MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT DNA-BINDING SEQUENCES (Abbreviations: EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; EBNA, Epstein Barr virus nuclear antigen; HSV, Herpes Simplex virus VZV, Vericella zoster virus; HPV, human papilloma virus HIV LTR, Human immunodeficiency virus long terminal repeat NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T cells; NFkB, nuclea factor kappaB; AIDS, acquired immune deficiency syndrome ARC, AIDS related complex; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HNF hepatic nuclear factor.) The origin of replication binding proteins, Epstei Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1) (Ambinder, R.F., e al.; Reisman, D. et al.), E2 (which is encoded by the huma papilloma virus) (Chin, M.T., et al.), UL9 (which i encoded by herpes simplex virus type 1) (McGeoch,D.J. , e al.), and the homologous protein in vericella zoster viru (VZV) (Stow, N.D. and Davison, A.J.), have short, well defined binding sites within the viral genome and ar therefore excellent target sites for a competitive DNA binding drug. Similarly, recognition sequences for DNA binding proteins that act as transcriptional regulator factors are also good target sites for antiviral DNA binding drugs. Examples include the binding site fo hepatic nuclear factor (HNF-l) , which is required for th expression of human hepatitis B virus (HBV) (Chang, H.-K.) and NFKB and NFAT-1 binding sites in the hum immunodeficiency virus (HIV) long terminal repeat (LTR), one or both of which may be involved in the expression the virus (Greene, W.C). Examples of non-viral DNA targets for DNA-bindi drugs are also shown in Table 1 to illustrate the wid range of potential applications for sequence-specific DNA binding molecules. For example, nuclear factor o activated T cells (NFAT-1) is a regulatory factor that i crucial to the inducible expression of the interleukin (IL-2) gene in response to signals from the antige receptor, which, in turn, is required for the cascade o molecular events during T cell activation (for review, se Edwards, CA. and Crabtree, G.R.). The mechanism of actio of two immunosuppressants, cyclosporin A and FK506, i thought to be to block the inducible expression of NFAT- (Schmidt,A. et al. and Banerji, S.S. et al.). However, th effects of these drugs are not specific to NFAT-1 therefore, a drug targeted specifically to the NFAT- binding site in the IL-2 enhancer would be desirable as a improved immunosuppressant. Targeting the DNA site with a DNA-binding drug rathe than targeting with a drug that affects the DNA-bindin protein (presumably the target of the curren immunosuppressants) is advantageous for at least tw reasons: first, there are many fewer target sites fo specific DNA sequences than specific proteins (eg., in th case of glucocorticoid receptor, a handful of DNA-bindin sites vs. about 50,000 protein molecules in each cell) an secondly, only the targeted gene need be affected by a DNA binding drug, while a protein-binding drug would disabl all the cellular functions of the protein. An example of the latter point is the binding site fo HNF-l in the human fibrinogen promoter. Fibrinogen leve is one of the most highly correlated factor wit cardiovascular disease. A drug targeted to either HNF-l o the HNF-l binding site in the fibrinogen promoter might b used to decrease fibrinogen expression in individuals a high risk for disease because of the overexpression of fibrinogen. However, since HNF-l is required for th expression of a number of normal hepatic genes, blockin the HNF-l protein would be toxic to liver function. In contrast, by blocking a DNA sequence that is composed in part of the HNF-l binding site and in part by flanking sequences for divergence, the fibrinogen gene can be targeted with a high level of selectivity, without harm to normal cellular HNF-l functions. The assay has been designed to screen virtually any DNA sequence. As described above, test sequences of medical significance include viral or microbial pathogen genomic sequences and sequences within or regulating the expression of oncogenes or other inappropriately expressed cellular genes. In addition to the detection of potential antiviral drugs, the assay of the present invention is also applicable to the detection of potential drugs for (i) disrupting the metabolism of other infectious agents, (ii) blocking or reducing the transcription of inappropriately expressed cellular genes (such as oncogenes or genes associated with certain genetic disorders) , and (iii) the enhancement or alteration of expression of certain cellular genes. 2) Defined sets of test sequences. The approach described in the above section discusses screening large numbers of fermentation broths, extracts, or other mixtures of unknowns against specific medically significant DNA target sequences. The assay can also be utilized to screen a large number of DNA sequences against known DNA-binding drugs to determine the relative affinity of the single drug for every possible defined specific sequence. For example, there are 4 n possible sequence where n — the number of nucleotides in the sequence. Thu there are 4 3 = 64 different three base pair sequences, 4 4 256 different four base pair sequences, 4 5 = 1024 differe 5 base pair sequences, etc. If these sequences are plac in the test site, the site adjacent to the screeni sequence (the example used in this invention is the U binding site) , then each of the different test sequenc can be screened against many different DNA-bindi molecules. The test sequences may be placed on either o both sides of the screening sequence, and the sequence flanking the other side of the test sequences are fixe sequences to stabilize the duplex and, on the 3' end of th top strand, to act as an annealing site for the primer (se Example 1) . For example, oligonucleotides sequences coul be constructed as shown in Figure 15 (SEQ ID NO:18). I Figure 15 the TEST and SCREENING sequences are indicated The preparation of such double-strande oligonucleotides is described in Example 1 and illustrate in Figure 4A and 4B. The test sequences, denoted in Figur 15 as X:Y (where X = A,C,G, or T and Y = the complementar sequence, T,G,C, or A) , may be any of the 256 different base pair sequences shown in Figure 13. Once a set of test oligonucleotides containing al possible four base pair sequences has been synthesized (se Example 1) , the set can be screened with any DNA-bindin drug. The relative effect of the drug on eac oligonucleotide assay system will reflect the relativ affinity of the drug for the test sequence. The entir spectrum of affinities for each particular DNA sequence ca therefore be defined for any particular DNA-binding drug The data generated using this approach can be used t facilitate molecular modeling programs and/or be use directly to design new DNA-binding molecules with increase affinity and specificity. Another type of ordered set of oligonucleotides tha may be useful for screening are sets comprised of scramble sequences with fixed base composition. For example, if th recognition sequence for a protein is 5'-GATC-3' an libraries were to be screened for DNA-binding molecule that recognised this sequence, then it would be desirabl to screen sequences of similar size and base composition a control sequences for the assay. The most precis experiment is one in which all possible 4 bp sequences ar screened; this represents 4 4 = 256 different tes sequences, a number that may not be practical in ever situation. However, there are many fewer possible 4 b sequences with the same base composition (using the base IG, 1A, IT, 1C; n! = 24 different 4 bp sequences with thi particular base composition) , which provides excellen controls without having to screen large numbers o sequences. 3) Theoretical considerations in choosin biological target sites: Specificity and Toxicity. One consideration in choosing sequences to scree using the assay of the present invention is test sequenc accessibility, that is, the potential exposure of th sequence in vivo to binding molecules. Cellular DNA i packaged in chromatin, rendering most sequences relativel inaccessible. Sequences that are actively transcribed particularly those sequences that are regulatory in nature are less protected and more accessible to both proteins an small molecules. This observation is substantiated by large literature on DNAase I sensitivity, footprintin studies with nucleases and small molecules, and genera studies on chromatin structure (Tullius) . The relativ accessibility of a regulatory sequence, as determined b DNAase I hypersensitivity, is likely to be several order of magnitude greater than an inactive portion of th cellular genome. For this reason the regulatory sequence of cellular genes, as well as viral regulatory o replication sequences, are useful regions to choose fo selecting specific inhibitory small molecules using th assay of the present invention. Another consideration in choosing sequences to b screened using the assay of the present invention is th uniqueness of the potential test sequence. As discusse above for the nuclear protein HNF-l, it is desirable tha small inhibitory molecules are specific to their target with minimal cross reactivity. Both sequence composition and length effect sequence uniqueness. Further, certain sequences are found less frequently in the human genome than in the genomes of other organisms, for example, mammalian viruses. Because of base composition and codon utilization differences, viral sequences are distinctly different from mammalian sequences. As one example, the dinucleotide CG is found much less frequently in mammalian cells than the dinucleotide sequence GC: further, in SV40, a mammalian virus, the sequences AGCT and ACGT are represented 34 and 0 times, respectively. Specific viral regulatory sequences can be chosen as test sequences keeping this bias in mind. Small inhibitory molecules identified which bind to such test sequences will be less likely to interfere with cellular functions. There are approximately 3 x 10 9 base pairs (bp) in the human genome. Of the known DNA-binding drugs for which there is crystallographic data, most bind 2-5 bp sequences. There are A* = 256 different 4 base sequences; therefore, on average, a single 4 bp site is found roughly 1.2 x 10 7 times in the human genome. An individual 8 base site would be found, on average, about 50,000 times in the genome. On the surface, it might appear that drugs targeted at even an 8 bp site might be deleterious to the cell because ther are so many binding sites; however, several othe considerations must be recognized. First, most DNA i tightly wrapped in chromosomal proteins and is relativel inaccessible to incoming DNA-binding molecules a demonstrated by the nonspecific endonucleolytic digestio of chromatin in the nucleus (Edwards, CA. and Firtel R.A.). Active transcription units are more accessible tha DNA bound in chromosomal proteins, but the most highl exposed regions of DNA in chromatin are the sites that bin regulatory factors. As demonstrated by DNAase hypersensitivity (Gross, D.S. and Garrard, W.T.) regulatory sites may be 100-1000 times more sensitive t endonucleolytic attack than the bulk of chromatin. This i one reason for targeting regulatory sequences with DNA binding drugs. Secondly, the argument that severa anticancer drugs that bind 2, 3, or 4 bp sequences hav sufficiently low toxicity that they can be used as drug indicates that, if high affinity binding sites for know drugs can be matched with specific viral target sequences it may be possible to use currently available drugs a antiviral agents at lower concentrations than they ar currently used, with a concomitantly lower toxicity. D. Using Test Matrices and Pattern Matching for th Analysis of Data. The assay described herein has been designed to use single DNA:protein interaction to screen for sequence specific and sequence-preferential DNA-binding molecule that can recognize virtually any specified sequence. B using sequences flanking the recognition site for a singl DNA:protein interaction, a very large number of differen sequences can be tested. The analysis of data yielded b such experiments displayed as matrices and analyzed b pattern matching techniques should yield information abo the relatedness of DNA sequences. The basic principle behind the DNA:protein assay o the present invention is that when molecules bind DN sequences flanking the recognition sequence for a specifi protein the binding of that protein is blocked Interference with protein binding likely occurs by eithe (or both) of two mechanisms: 1) directly by steri hindrance, or 2) indirectly by perturbations transmitted t the recognition sequence through the DNA molecule, a typ of allosteric perturbation. Both of these mechanisms will presumably exhibi distance effects. For inhibition by direct steri hindrance direct data for very small molecules is availabl from methylation and ethylation interference studies These data suggest that for methyl and ethyl moieties, th steric effect is limited by distance effects to 4-5 bas pairs. Even still the number of different sequences tha can theoretically be tested for these very small molecule is still very large (i.e., 5 base pair combinations tota 4 5 (=1024) different sequences) . In practice, the size of sequences tested can b explored empirically for different sized test DNA-bindin molecules. A wide array of sequences with increasin sequence complexity can be routinely investigated. Thi may be accomplished efficiently by synthesizing degenerat oligonucleotides and multiplexing oligonucleotides in th assay process (i.e., using a group of differen oligonucleotides in a single assay) or by employing poole sequences in test matrices. In view of the above, assays employing a specifi protein and oligonucleotides containing the specific recognition site for that protein flanked by different sequences on either side of the recognition site can be used to simultaneously screen for many different molecules including small molecules, that have binding preference for individual sequences or families of related sequences Figure 12 demonstrates how the analysis of a test matri yields information about the nature of competitor sequenc specificity. As an example, to screen for molecules tha could preferentially recognize each of the 256 possibl tetranucleotide sequences (Figure 13), oligonucleotide could be constructed that contain these 256 sequence immediately adjacent to a 11 bp recognition sequence of UL oriS (SEQ ID NO:15), which is identical in each construct In Figure 12 "+" indicates that the mixture retard or blocks the formation of DNA:protein complexes i solution and "-" indicates that the mixture had no marke effect on DNA:protein interactions. A summary of th results of the test from Figure 12 are shown in Table . TABLE2 These results demonstrate how such a matrix provide data on the presence of sequence specific binding activit is a test mixture and also provides inherent controls fo non-specific binding. For example, the effect of test mi #8 on the different test assays reveals that the test mi preferentially affects the oligonucleotides that contai the sequence CCCT. Note that the sequence does not have t be within the test site for test mix #8 to exert an affect By displaying the data in a matrix, the analysis of th sequences affected by the different test mixtures i facilitated. E) Other Applications. The potential pharmaceutical applications fo sequence-specific DNA-binding molecules are broad including antiviral, antifungal, antibacterial, antitumo agents, immunosuppressants, and cardiovascular drugs Sequence-specific DNA-binding molecules can also be usefu as molecular reagents as, for example, specific sequenc probes. As more molecules are detected, information about th nature of DNA-binding molecules will be gathered eventually facilitating the design and/or modification o new molecules with different or specialized activities. Although the assay has been described in terms of th detection of sequence-specific DNA-binding molecules, th reverse assay could be achieved by adding DNA in excess t protein to look for peptide sequence specific protein binding inhibitors. The following examples illustrate, but in no way ar intended to limit the present invention. Materials and Methods Synthetic oligonucleotides were prepared using commercially available automated oligonucleotide synthe- sizers. Alternatively, custom designed synthetic oligo¬ nucleotides may be purchased, for example, from Synthetic Genetics (San Diego, CA) . Complementary strands were annealed to generate double-strand oligonucleotides. Restriction enzymes were obtained from Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis IN) or New England Biolabs (Beverly MA) and were used as per the manufacturer's directions. Distamycin A and Doxorubicin were obtained from Sigm (St. Louis, MO) . Actinomycin D was obtained fro Boehringer Mannheim or Sigma. Example 1 Preparation of the Oligonucleotide Containing the Screening seguence This example describes the preparation of (i biotinylated/digoxyginin/radiolabelled, and (ii) radio labelled double-stranded oligonucleotides that contain th screening sequence and selected Test sequences. A. Biotinylation. The oligonucleotides were prepared as described above The wild-type control seguence for the UL9 binding site, a obtained from HSV, is shown in Figure 4. The screenin seguence, i.e. the UL9 binding sequence, is CGTTCGCACT (SEQ ID NO:l) and is underlined in Figure 4A. Typically sequences 5' and/or 3' to the screening sequence wer replaced by a selected Test sequence (Figure 5) . One example of the preparation of a site-specificall biotinylated oligonucleotide is outlined in Figure 4. A oligonucleotide primer complementary to the 3' sequences o the screening sequence-containing oligonucleotide wa synthesized. This oligonucleotide terminated at th residue corresponding to the C in position 9 of th screening sequence. The primer oligonucleotide wa hybridized to the oligonucleotide containing the screenin sequence. Biotin-11-dUTP (Bethesda Research Laboratorie (BRL) , Gaithersburg MD) and Klenow enzyme were added t this complex (Figure 4) and the resulting partially double stranded biotinylated complexes were separated from th unincorporated nucleotides using either pre-prepared G-2 Sephadex spin columns (Pharmacia, Piscataway NJ) o "NENSORB" columns (New England Nuclear) as pe manufacturer's instructions. The remaining single-stran region was converted to double-strands using DNA polymeras I Klenow fragment and dNTPs resulting in a fully double stranded oligonucleotide. A second G-25 Sephadex colum was used to purify the double-stranded oligonucleotide Oligonucleotides were diluted or resuspended in 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA and stored at -20° For radiolabelling the complexes, 32 P-alpha-dCTP (Ne England Nuclear, Wilmington, DE) replaced dCTP for th double-strand completion step. Alternatively, the to strand, the primer, or the fully double-strande oligonucleotide have been radiolabeled with 7~ 32 P-ATP an polynucleotide kinase (NEB, Beverly, MA) . Preliminar studies have employed radiolabeled, double-strande oligonucleotides. The oligonucleotides are prepared b radiolabeling the primer with T4 polynucleotide kinase an γ- 32 P-ATP, annealing the "top" strand full lengt oligonucleotide, and "filling-in" with Klenow fragment an deoxynucleotide triphosphates. After phosphorylation an second strand synthesis, oligonucleotides are separate from buffer and unincorporated triphosphates using G-2 Sephadex preformed spin columns (IBI or Biorad) . Thi process is outlined in Figure 4B. The reaction condition for all of the above Klenow reactions were as follows: 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM NaCl, 1 m dithioerythritol, 0.33-100 μM deoxytriphosphates, 2 units Klenow enzyme (Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis IN) . The Klenow reactions were incubated at 25°C for 15 minutes to 1 hour. The polynucleotide kinase reactions were incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes to 1 hour. B) End-labelingwith digoxigenin. The biotinylated, radiolabelled oligonucleotides or radiolabeled oligonucleotides were isolated as above and resuspended in 0.2 M potassium cacodylate (pH=7.2), 4 mM MgCl 2 , 1 mM 2- mercaptoethanol, and 0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. this reaction mixture digoxigenin-11-dUTP (an analog o dTTP, 2'-deoxy-uridine-5'-triphosphate, coupled digoxigenin via an ll-atom spacer arm, Boehringer Mannhei Indianapolis IN) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferas (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) were added. The number o Dig-11-dUTP moieties incorporated using this metho appeared to be less than 5 (probably only 1 or 2) as judge by electrophoretic mobility on polyacrylamide gels of th treated fragment as compared to oligonucleotides of know length. The biotinylated or non-biotinylated, digoxygenin containing, radiolabelled oligonucleotides were isolated a above and resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 50 m NaCl, pH 7.5 for use in the binding assays. The above procedure can also be used to biotinylat the other strand by using an oligonucleotide containing th screening sequence complementary to the one shown in Figur 4 and a primer complementary to the 3' end of tha molecule. To accomplish the biotinylation Biotin-7-dAT was substituted for Biotin-11-dUTP. Biotinylation was als accomplished by chemical synthetic methods: for example, a activated nucleotide is incorporated into th oligonucleotide and the active group is subsequentl reacted with NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce) . Other bioti derivatives can also be used. C Radiolabelling the Oligonucleotides Generally, oligonucleotides were radiolabelled wit gamma- 32 P-ATP or alpha- 32 P-deoxynucleotide triphosphates an T4 polynucleotide kinase or the Klenow fragment of DN polymerase, respectively. Labelling reactions wer performed in the buffers and by the methods recommended b the manufacturers (New England Biolabs, Beverly MA Bethesda Research Laboratories, Gaithersburg MD; o Boehringer/Mannheim, Indianapolis IN) . Oligonucleotide were separated from buffer and unincorporated triphosphate using G-25 Sephadex preformed spin columns (IBI, New Haven CT; or Biorad, Richmond, CA) or "NENSORB" preformed column (New England Nuclear, Wilmington, DE) as per th manufacturers instructions. There are several reasons to enzymatically synthesiz the second strand. The two main reasons are that by usin an excess of primer, second strand synthesis can be drive to near completion so that nearly all top strands ar annealed to bottom strands, which prevents the top stran single strands from folding back and creating additiona and unrelated double-stranded structures, and secondly since all of the oligonucleotides are primed with a commo primer, the primer can bear the end-label so that all o the oligonucleotides will be labeled to exactly the sam specific activity. Example 2 Preparation of the UL9 Protein A. Cloning of the UL9 coding sequences into pAC373. To express full length UL9 protein a baculoviru expression system has been used. The sequence of the UL9 coding region of Herpes Simplex Virus has been disclosed b McGeoch et al. and is available as an EMBL nucleic aci sequence. The recombinant baculovirus AcNPV/UL9A, whic contained the UL9 coding sequence, was obtained from Mar Challberg (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD) . The construction of this vector has been previously described (Olivo et al. (1988, 1989)). Briefly, the Narl/- EcoRV fragment was derived from pMC160 (Wu et al.) . Blunt- ends were generated on this fragment by using all four dNTPs and the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis IN) to fill in the terminal overhangs. The resulting fragment was blunt-end ligated into the unique BamHI site of the baculoviral vector pAC3T3 (Summers et al.). B. Cloning of the UL9 coding sequence in pVL1393 The UL9 coding region was cloned into a secon baculovirus vector, pVL1393 (Luckow et al.). The 3077 b Narl/EcoRV fragment containing the UL9 gene was excise from vector pEcoD (obtained from Dr. Bing Lan Rong, Ey Research Institute, Boston, MA) : the plasmid pEco contains a 16.2 kb EcoRl fragment derived from HSV-I tha bears the UL9 gene (Goldin et al.). Blunt-ends wer generated on the UL9-containing fragment as describe above. EcoRl linkers (10 mer) were blunt-end ligate (Ausubel et al.; Sambrook et al.) to the blunt-ended Narl/ EcoRV fragment. The vector pVL1393 (Luckow et al.) was digested wit EcoRl and the linearized vector isolated. This vecto contains 35 nucleotides of the 5' end of the coding regio of the polyhedron gene upstream of the polylinker clonin site. The polyhedron gene ATG has been mutated to ATT t prevent translational initiation in recombinant clones tha do not contain a coding sequence with a functional ATG The EcoRI/X Q fragment was ligated into the linearize vector, the ligation mixture transformed into E. coli an ampicillin resistant clones selected. Plasmids recovere from the clones were analyzed by restriction digestion an plasmids carrying the insert with the amino terminal UL coding sequences oriented to the 5' end of the polyhedro gene were selected. This plasmid was designate pVL1393/UL9 (Figure 7) . pVL1393/UL9 was cotransfected with wild-typ baculoviral DNA (AcMNPV; Summers et al.) into SF (Spodoptera frugiperda) cells (Summers et al.) Recombinant baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells were identifie and clonally purified (Summers et al.). C Expression of the UL9 Protein. Clonal isolates of recombinant baculovirus infecte Sf9 cells were grown in Grace's medium as described b Summers et al. The cells were scraped from tissue cultur plates and collected by centrifugation (2,000 rpm, for minutes, 4°C) . The cells were then washed once wit phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Maniatis et al.). Cel pellets were frozen at -70°C For lysis the cells wer resuspended in 1.5 volumes 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10 glycerol, 1.7 M NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreito (DTT) , and 0.5 mM phenyl methyl sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) Cell lysates were cleared by ultracentrifugation (Beckma table top ultracentrifuge, TLS 55 rotor, 34 krpm, 1 hr 4 β C) . The supernatant was dialyzed overnight at 4° against 2 liters dialysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10 glycerol, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM dtt, and 0.1 m PMSF) . These partially purified extracts were prepared an used in DNA:protein binding experiments. If necessar extracts were concentrated using a "CENTRICON 30 filtration device (Amicon, Danvers MA) . D. Cloning the Truncated UL9 Protein. The sequence encoding the C-terminal third of UL9 an the 3' flanking sequences, an approximately 1.2 k fragment, was subcloned into the bacterial expressio vector, pGEX-2T (Figure 6) . The pGEX-2T is a modificatio of the pGEX-1 vector of Smith et al. which involved th insertion of a thrombin cleavage sequence in-frame with th glutathione-S-transferase protein (gst) . A 1,194 bp BamHI /EcoRV fragment of pEcoD was isolate that contained a 951 bp region encoding the C-terminal 317 amino acids of UL9 and 243 bp of the 3' untranslated region. This BamHI/EcoRV UL9 carboxy-terminal (UL9-C00H) containing fragment was blunt-ended and EcoRI linkers added as described above. The EcoRI linkers were designed to allow in-frame fusion of the UL9 coding seguence to th gst-thrombin coding sequences. The linkered fragment wa isolated and digested with EcoRI. The pGEX-2T vector wa digested with EcoRI, treated with Calf Intestinal Alkalin Phosphatase (CIP) and the linear vector isolated. Th EcoRI linkered UL9-C00H fragment was ligated to the linea vector (Figure 6) . The ligation mixture was transforme into E. coli and ampicillin resistant colonies wer selected. Plasmids were isolated from the ampicilli resistant colonies and analyzed by restriction enzym digestion. A plasmid which generated a gst/thrombin/UL9 COOH in frame fusion was identified (Figure 6) an designated pGEX-2T/UL9-COOH. A. Expression of the Truncated UL9 Protein. E. coli strain JM109 was transformed with pGEX-2T/C UL9-COOH and was grown at 37°C to saturation densit overnight. The overnight culture was diluted 1:10 with L medium containing ampicillin and grown from one hour a 30 β C IPTG (isopropyi thi(?-/3-galactoside) (GIBCO-BRL) wa added to a final concentration of 0.1 mM and the incubatio was continued for 2-5 hours. Bacterial cells containin the plasmid were subjected to the temperature shift an IPTG conditions, which induced transcription from the ta promoter. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspende in 1/100 culture volume of MTPBS (150 mM NaCl, 16 m Na 2 HP0 4 , 4 mM NaH 2 P0 4 ) . Cells were lysed by sonication an lysates cleared of cellular debris by centrifugation. The fusion protein was purified over a glutathion agarose affinity column as described in detail by Smith e al. The fusion protein was eluted from the affinity colum with reduced glutathione, dialyzed against UL9 dialysi buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 m DTT, 0.1 mM PMSF) and cleaved with thrombin (2 ng/ug o fusion protein) . An aliquot of the supernatant obtained from IPT induced cultures of pGEX-2T/C-UL9-C00H-containing cells a an aliquot of the affinity-purified, thrombin-cleav protein were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide g electrophoresis. The result of this analysis is shown Figure 8. The 63 kilodalton GST/C-UL9 fusion protein i the largest band in the lane marked GST-UL9 (lane 2) . Th first lane contains protein size standards. The UL9-COO protein band (lane GST-UL9 + Thrombin, Figure 8, lane 3) i the band located between 30 and 46 kD: the glutathion transferase protein is located just below the 30 kD siz standard. In a separate experiment a similar analysis wa performed using the uninduced culture: it showed n protein corresponding in size to the fusion protein. Extracts are dialyzed before use. Also, if necessary the extracts can be concentrated typically by filtratio using a "CENTRICON 30" filter. Example 3 Binding Assays A. Band shift gels. DNA:protein binding reactions containing both labelle complexes and free DNA were separated electrophoreticall on 4-10% polyacrylamide/Tris-Borate-EDTA (TBE) gels (Frei et al.; Garner et al.). The gels were then fixed, dried and exposed to X-ray film. The autoradiograms of the gel were examined for band shift patterns. B. Filter Binding Assays A second method used particularly in determining th off-rates for protein:oligonucleotide complexes is filte binding (Woodbury et al.) . Nitrocellulose disk (Schleicher and Schuell, BA85 filters) that have bee soaked in binding buffer (see below) were placed on vacuum filter apparatus. DNA:protein binding reaction (see below; typically 15-30 μl) are diluted to 0.5 ml wit binding buffer (this dilutes the concentration o components without dissociating complexes) and applied t the discs with vacuum applied. Under low salt condition the DNA:protein complex sticks to the filter while free DN passes through. The discs are placed in scintillatio counting fluid (New England Nuclear) , and the cp determined using a scintillation counter. This technique has been adapted to 96-well and 72-slo nitrocellulose filtration plates (Schleicher and Schuell using the above protocol except (i) the reaction dilutio and wash volumes are reduced and (ii) the flow rate throug the filter is controlled by adjusting the vacuum pressure This method greatly f cilitates the number of assay sample that can be analyzed. Using radioactive oligonucleotides the samples are applied to nitrocellulose filters, th filters are exposed to x-ray film, then analyzed using Molecular Dynamics scanning densitometer. This system ca transfer data directly into analytical software program (e.g., Excel) for analysis and graphic display. Example 4 Functional UL9 Binding Assay A. Functional DNA-binding Activity Assay Purified protein was tested for functional activit using band-shift assays. Radiolabelled oligonucleotide (prepared as in Example IB) that contain the 11 b recognition sequence were mixed with the UL9 protein i binding buffer (optimized reaction conditions: 0.1 ng 32 P DNA, 1 ul UL9 extract, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 50 mM KCl, an 1 mM DTT) . The reactions were incubated at roo temperature for 10 minutes (binding occurs in less than minutes) , then separated electrophoretically on 4-10% non denaturing polyacrylamide gels. UL9-specific binding t the oligonucleotide is indicated by a shift in mobility o the oligonucleotide on the gel in the presence of the UL protein but not in its absence. Bacterial extract containing (+) or without (-) UL9 protein and affinit purified UL9 protein were tested in the assay. Onl bacterial extracts containing UL9 or affinity purified UL protein generate the gel band-shift indicating protei binding. The degree of extract that needed to be added to th reaction mix, in order to obtain UL9 protein exces relative to the oligonucleotide, was empirically determine for each protein preparation/extract. Aliquots of- th preparation were added to the reaction mix and treated as above. The quantity of extract at which the majority of the labelled oligonucleotide appears in the DNA:protein complex was evaluated by band-shift or filter binding assays. The assay is most sensitive under conditions in which the minimum amount of protein is added to bind most of the DNA. Excess protein can decrease the sensitivity of the assay. B. Rate of Dissociation The rate of dissociation is determined using a competition assay. An oligonucleotide having the sequence presented in Figure 4, which contained the binding site for UL9 (SEQ ID NO:14), was radiolabelled with 32 P-ATP and polynucleotide kinase (Bethesda Research Laboratories) . The competitor DNA was a 17 base pair oligonucleotide (SEQ ID NO:16) containing the binding site for UL9. In the competition assays, the binding reactions (Example 4A) were assembled with each of the oligonucleotides and placed on ice. Unlabelled oligonucleotide (1 μg) was added 1, 2, 4, 6, or 21 hours before loading the reaction on an 8% polyacrylamide gel (run in TBE buffer (Maniatis et al.)) to separate the reaction components. The dissociation rates, under thes conditions, for the truncated UL9 (UL9-COOH) and the ful length UL9 is approximately 4 hours at 4°C In addition random oligonucleotides (a 10,000-fold excess) that did no contain the UL9 binding sequence and sheared herring sper DNA (a 100,000-fold excess) were tested: neither of thes control DNAs competed for binding with the oligonucleotid containing the UL9 binding site. C Optimization of the UL9 Binding Assay (i) Truncated UL9 from the bacterial expressio system. The effects of the following components on the bindin and dissociation rates of UL9-COOH with its cognate bindin site have been tested and optimized: buffering condition (including the pH, type of buffer, and concentration o buffer) ; the type and concentration of monovalent cation the presence of divalent cations and heavy metals temperature; various polyvalent cations at differen concentrations; and different redox reagents at differen concentrations. The effect of a given component wa evaluated starting with the reaction conditions given abov and based on the dissociation reactions described i Example 4B. The optimized conditions used for the binding of UL9 COOH contained in bacterial extracts (Example 2E) t oligonucleotides containing the HSV ori sequence (SEQ I NO:l) were as follows: 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 50 mM KCl, mM DTT, 0.005 - 0.1 ng radiolabeled (specific activity approximately 10 8 cpm/μg) or digoxiginated, biotinylate oligonucleotide probe, and 5-10 μg crude UL9-COOH protei preparation (1 mM EDTA is optional in the reaction mix) . Under optimized conditions, UL9-COOH binds very rapidly an has a dissociation rate of about 4 hours at 4°C with non biotinylated oligonucleotide and 5-10 minutes wit biotinylated oligonucleotides. The dissociation rate UL9-C00H changes markedly under different physic conditions. Typically, the activity of a UL9 protei preparation was assessed using the gel band-shift assay an related to the total protein content of the extract as method of standardization. The addition of herring sper DNA depended on the purity of UL9 used in the experimen Binding assays were incubated at 25°C for 5-30 minutes. (ii) Full length UL9 protein from the baculoviru system. The binding reaction conditions for the full lengt baculovirus-produced UL9 polypeptide have also bee optimized. The optimal conditions for the current assa were determined to be as follows: 20 mM Hepes; 100 m NaCl; 0.5 mM dithiothreitol; 1 mM EDTA; 5% glycerol; fro 0 to 10 4 -fold excess of sheared herring sperm DNA; 0.005 0.1 ng radiolabeled (specific activity, approximately 10 cpm/μg) or digoxiginated, biotinylated oligonucleotid probe, and 5-10 μg crude UL9 protein preparation. The ful length protein also binds well under the optimize conditions established for the truncated UL9-C00H protein. Example 5 The Effect of Test Sequence Variation on the Off-Rate of the UL9 Protein The oligonucleotides shown in Figure 5 wer radiolabelled as described above. The competition assays were performed as described in Example 4B using UL9-C00H. Radiolabelled oligonucleotides were mixed with the UL9-C00H protein in binding buffer (typical reaction: 0.1 ng oligonucleotide 32 P-DNA, 1 μl UL9-C00H extract, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT) . The reactions were incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes. A zero time point sample was then taken and loaded onto an 8% polyacrylamide gel (run use TBE) . One μg of the unlabelle 17 bp competitive DNA oligonucleotide (SEQ ID NO:16 (Example 4B) was added at 5, 10, 15, 20, or 60 minute before loading the reaction sample on the gel. The result of this analysis are shown in Figure 9: the screenin sequences that flank the UL9 binding site (SEQ ID NO:5-SE ID NO:13) are very dissimilar but have little effect on th off-rate of UL9. Accordingly, these results show that th UL9 DNA binding protein is effective to bind to a screenin seguence in duplex DNA with a binding affinity that i substantially independent of test sequences placed adjacen the screening sequence. Filter binding experiments gav the same result. Example 6 The Effect of Actinomycin D. Distamycin A. and Doxorubicin on UL9 Binding to the screening Seguence is Dependent on the Specific Test Sequence Different oligonucleotides, each of which containe the screening sequence (SEQ ID NO:l) flanked on the 5' an 3' sides by a test sequence (SEQ ID NO:5 to SEQ ID NO:13) were evaluated for the effects of distamycin A, actinomyci D, and doxorubicin on UL9-COOH binding. Binding assays were performed as described in Exampl 5. The oligonucleotides used in the assays are shown i Figure 5. The assay mixture was allowed to pre-equilibrat for 15 minutes at room temperature prior to the addition o drug. A concentrated solution of Distamycin A was prepare in dH 2 0 and was added to the binding reactions at th following concentrations: 0, 1 μM, 4 μM, 16 μM, and 40 μM The drug was added and incubated at room temperature for hour. The reaction mixtures were then loaded on an 8 polyacrylamide gel (Example 5) and the components separate electrophoretically. Autoradiographs of these gels a shown in Figure 10A. The test sequences tested were follows: UL9 polyT, SEQ ID NO:9; UL9 CCCG, SEQ ID NO: UL9 GGGC, SEQ ID NO:6; UL9 polyA, SEQ ID NO:8; and U ATAT, SEQ ID NO:7. These results demonstrate th Distamycin A preferentially disrupts binding to UL9 poly UL9 polyA and UL9 ATAT. A concentrated solution of Actinomycin D was prepar in dH 2 0 and was added to the binding reactions at t following concentrations: 0 μM and 50 μM. The drug wa added and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Equa volumes of dH 2 0 were added to the control samples. Th reaction mixtures were then loaded on an 8% polyacrylamid gel (Example 5) and the components separate electrophoretically. Autoradiographs of these gels ar shown in Figure 10B. In addition to the test sequence tested above with Distamycin A, the following tes sequences were also tested with Actinomycin D: AToril, SE ID NO:11; oriEco2, SEQ ID NO:12, and oriEco3, SEQ ID NO:13 These results demonstrate that actinomycin D preferentiall disrupts the binding of UL9 to the oligonucleotides UL CCCG and UL9 GGGC. A concentrated solution of Doxorubicin was prepared i dH 2 0 and was added to the binding reactions at the followin concentrations: 0 μM, 15 μM and 35 μM. The drug was adde and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Equa volumes of dH 2 0 were added to the control samples. Th reaction mixtures were then loaded on an 8% polyacrylamid gel (Example 5) and the components separate electrophoretically. Autoradiographs of these gels ar shown in Figure IOC The same test sequences were teste as for Actinomycin D. These results demonstrate tha Doxorubicin preferentially disrupts the binding of UL9 t the oligonucleotides UL9polyT, UL9 GGGC, oriEco2, an oriEco3. Doxorubicin appears to particularly disrupt th UL9:screening sequence interaction when the test sequenc oriEco3 is used. The sequences of the test sequences fo oriEco2 and oriEco3 differ by only one base: an additiona T residue inserted at position 12, compare SEQ ID NO:12 an SEQ ID NO:13. Example 7 Use of the Biotin/Streptavidin Reporter System A. The Capture of Protein-Free DNA. Several methods have been employed to sequester unbound DNA from DNA:protein complexes, (i) Magnetic beads Streptavidin-conjugated superparamagnetic polystyrene beads (Dynabeads M-280 Streptavidin, Dynal AS, 6-7xl0 8 beads/ml) are washed in binding buffer then used to capture biotinylated oligonucleotides (Example 1) . The beads are added to a 15 ul binding reaction mixture containing binding buffer and biotinylated oligonucleotide. The beads/oligonucleotide mixture is incubated for varying lengths of time with the binding mixture to determine the incubation period to maximize capture of protein-free biotinylated oligonucleotides. After capture of the biotinylated oligonucleotide, the beads can be retrieved by placing the reaction tubes in a magnetic rack (96-well plate magnets are available from Dynal) . The beads are then washed. (ii) Agarose beads Biotinylated agarose beads (immobilized D-biotin, Pierce, Rockford, IL) are bound to avidin by treating the beads with 50 μg/μl avidin in binding buffer overnight at 4°C The beads are washed in binding buffer and used to capture biotinylated DNA. The beads are mixed with binding mixtures to capture biotinylated DNA. The beads are removed by centrifugation or by collection on a non-bindin filter disc. For either of the above methods, quantification of th presence of the oligonucleotide depends on the method o labelling the oligonucleotide. If the oligonucleotide i radioactively labelled: (i) the beads and supernatant ca be loaded onto polyacrylamide gels to separate protein:DN complexes from the bead:DNA complexes by electrophoresis and autoradiography performed; (ii) the beads can be place in scintillation fluid and counted in a scintillatio counter. Alternatively, presence of the oligonucleotid can be determined using a chemiluminescent or colorimetri detection system. B. Detection of Protein-Free DNA. The DNA is end-labelled with digoxigenin-11-dUT (Example 1) . The antigenic digoxigenin moiety i recognized by an antibody-enzyme conjugate, anti digoxigenin-alkaline phosphatase (Boehringer Mannhei Indianapolis IN) . The DNA/antibody-enzyme conjugate i then exposed to the substrate of choice. The presence o dig-dUTP does not alter the ability of protein to bind th DNA or the ability of streptavidin to bind biotin. (i) Chemiluminescent Detection. Digoxigenin-labelled oligonucleotides are detecte using the chemiluminescent detection system "SOUTHER LIGHTS" developed by Tropix, Inc. (Bedford, MA) . Use o this detection system is illustrated in Figures 11A an 11B. The technique can be applied to detect DNA that has been captured on either beads or filters. Biotinylated oligonucleotides, which have termina digoxygenin-containing residues (Example 1) , are capture on magnetic (Figure 11A) or agarose beads (Figure 11B) as described above. The beads are isolated and treated t block non-specific binding by incubation with I-Light blocking buffer (Tropix) for 30 minutes at roo temperature. The presence of oligonucleotides is detecte using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibodies t digoxygenin. Anti-digoxigenin-alkaline phosphatas (anti-dig-AP, 1:5000 dilution of 0.75 units/ul, Boehringe Mannheim) is incubated with the sample for 30 minutes, decanted, and the sample washed with 100 mM Tris-HCl, p 7.5, 150 mM NaCl. The sample is pre-equilibrated with washes of 50 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH 9.5, 1 M MgCl , the incubated in the same buffer containing 0.25 mM 3-(2' spiroadamantane)-4-methoxy-4-(3'-phosphoryloxy) phenyl-1,2 dioxetane disodium salt (AMPPD) for 5 minutes at roo temperature. AMPPD was developed (Tropix Inc.) as chemiluminescent substrate for alkaline phosphatase. Upo dephosphorylation of AMPPD the resulting compoun decomposes, releasing a prolonged, steady emission of ligh at 477 nm. Excess liquid is removed from filters and the emissio of light occurring as a result of the dephosphorylation o AMPPD by alkaline phosphatase can be measured by exposur to x-ray film or by detection in a luminometer. In solution, the bead-DNA-anti-dig-AP is resuspende in "SOUTHERN LIGHT" assay buffer and AMPPD and measure directly in a luminometer. Large scale screening assays are performed using a 96-well plate-reading luminomete (Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, VA) . Subpicogra quantities of DNA (10 2 to 10 3 attomoles (an attomole is 10" 1 moles)) can be detected using the Tropix system in conjunction with the plate-reading luminometer. (ii) Colorimetric Detection. Standard alkaline phosphatase colorimetric substrates are also suitable for the above detection reactions. Typically substrates include 4-nitrophenyl phosphate (Boehringer Mannheim) . Results of colorimetric assays ca be evaluated in multiwell plates (as above) using a plate reading spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Menlo Par CA) . The use of the light emission system is mor sensitive than the colorimetric systems. While the invention has been described with referenc to specific methods and embodiments, it will be appreciate that various modifications and changes may be made withou departing from the invention. SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INFORMATION: (i) APPLICANT: Edwards, Cynthia A. Cantor, Charles R. Andrews, Beth M. (ii) TITLE OF INVENTION: Screening Assay for the Detection of DNA-Binding Molecules (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 18 (iv) CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: (A) ADDRESSEE: LAW OFFICES OF PETER J. DEHLINGER (B) STREET: P.O. Box 60850 (C) CITY: Palo Alto (D) STATE: CA (E) COUNTRY: USA (F) ZIP: 94306 (v) COMPUTER READABLE FORM: (A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk (B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS (D) SOFTWARE: Patentin Release #1.0, Version #1.25 (vi) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: (B) FILING DATE: (C) CLASSIFICATION: (vii) PREVIOUS APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: 07/723,618 (B) FILING DATE: 27-JUN-1991 (C) CLASSIFICATION: (viii) ATTORNEY/AGENT INFORMATION: (A) NAME: Fabian, Gary R. (B) REGISTRATION NUMBER: 33,875 (C) REFERENCE/DOCKET NUMBER: 4600-0075.41 (ix) TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION: (A) TELEPHONE: (415) 323-8302 (B) TELEFAX: (415) 323-8306 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:l: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9 BINDING SITE, HSV oriS, higher affinity (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:l: CGTTCGCACT T (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9 BINDING SITE, HSV oriS, lower affinity (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2: TGCTCGCACT T (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:3: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9Z1 TEST SEQ. / UL9 ASSAY SEQ. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:3: GCGCGCGCGC GTTCGCACTT CCGCCGCCGG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:4: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9Z2 TEST SEQ. / UL9 ASSAY SEQ. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: : GGCGCCGGCC GTTCGCACTT CGCGCGCGCG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:5: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9 CCCG TEST SEQ. / UL9 ASSAY SEQ. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:5: GGCCCGCCCC GTTCGCACTT CCCGCCCCGG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:6: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9 GGGC TEST SEQ. / UL9 ASSAY SEQ. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:6: GGCGGGCGCC GTTCGCACTT GGGCGGGCGG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:7: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9 ATAT TEST SEQ. / UL9 ASSAY SEQ. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:7: GGATATATAC GTTCGCACTT TAATTATTGG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:8: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9 polyA TEST SEQ. / UL9 ASSAY SEQ. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:8: GGAAAAAAAC GTTCGCACTT AAAAAAAAGG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:9: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9 polyT TEST SEQ. / UL9 ASSAY SEQ. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:9: GGTTTTTTTC GTTCGCACTT TTTTTTTTGG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:10: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9 GCAC TEST SEQ. / UL9 ASSAY SEQ. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:10: GGACGCACGC GTTCGCACTT GCAGCAGCGG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:11: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9 ATori-1 TEST SEQUENCE / UL9 ASSAY SEQ. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:ll: GCGTATATAT CGTTCGCACT TCGTCCCAAT (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:12: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 31 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: oriEC02 TEST SEQ. / UL9 ASSAY SEQ. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:12: GGCGAATTCG ACGTTCGCAC TTCGTCCCAA T (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:13: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 32 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: oriEC03 TEST SEQ. / UL9 ASSAY SEQ. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:13: GGCGAATTCG ATCGTTCGCA CTTCGTCCCA AT (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:14: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 36 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: WILD TYPE (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:14: AAGTGAGAAT TCGAAGCGTT CGCACTTCGT CCCAAT (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:15: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 9 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: TRUNCATED UL9 BINDING SITE, COMPARE SEQ ID NO:l (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:15: TTCGCACTT (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:16: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 17 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: HSVB1/4, SEQUENCE OF COMPETITOR DNA MOLECULE ( i) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:16: GGTCGTTCGC ACTTCGC (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:17: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 11 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYFE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9 BINDING SITE, HSV oriS (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:17: CGTTCTCACTT (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:18: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 37 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: YES (iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: UL9 ASSAY SEQUENCE, FIGURE 15 (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:18: GCGTAANNNNCGTTCGCACTTNNNNCTTCGTCCCAAT 37

Claims: IT IS CLAIMED: 1. A method of screening for molecules capable o binding to a selected test sequence in a duplex DNA comprising (i) adding a molecule to be screened to a test syste composed of (a) a DNA binding protein which is effective t bind to a screening sequence in a duplex DNA with a bindin affinity that is substantially independent of said tes sequence adjacent the screening sequence, but where sai protein binding is sensitive to binding of molecules t such test sequence, and (b) a duplex DNA having sai screening and test sequences adjacent one another, wherei the binding protein is present in molar excess over th screening sequence present in the duplex DNA, (ii) incubating the molecule in the test system for period sufficient to permit binding of the compound bein tested to the test seguence in the duplex DNA, and (iii) detecting the amount of binding protein bound to the duplex DNA before and after said adding. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the screening sequence/binding protein is selected from the group consisting of EBV origin of replication/EBNA, HSV origin of replication/UL9, VZV origin of replication/UL9-like, and HPV origin of replication/E2, and lambda o L -o R /cro . 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the DNA screening seguence is from the HSV origin of replication and the binding protein is UL9. 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the DNA screening sequence is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:l, SEQ ID N0:2, SEQ ID NO:15, and SEQ ID NO:17. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said detecting i accomplished using either a gel band-shift assay or filter-binding assay. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the test sequence are selected from the group consisting of EBV origin o replication, HSV origin of replication, VZV origin o replication, HPV origin of replication, interleukin enhancer, HIV-LTR, HBV enhancer, and fibrinogen promoter. 7. The method of claim 1, where the test sequence are selected from a defined set of nucleic acid sequences. 8. The method of claim 7, wherein said defined set o DNA sequences has [X N ] N combinations, where X N is sequenc of deoxyribonucleotides and the number o deoxyribonucleotides in each sequence is N, N is greate than or equal to three. 9. The method of claim 8, wherein N is 3-20. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein N is 4-10. 11. The method of claim 10, wherein N is 4 and th number of combinations is 256. 12. The method of claim 1, wherein said detectin includes the use of a capture system that traps DNA free o bound protein. 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the captur system involves the biotinylation of a nucleotide withi the screening sequence (i) that does not eliminate th protein's ability to bind to the screening sequence, (ii) that is capable of binding streptavidin, and (iii) wherei the biotin moiety is protected from interactions wit streptavidin when the protein is bound to the screenin sequence. 14. The method of claim 1, wherein said bindin protein is present in a molar concentration less than o equal to the molar concentration of the screening sequenc present in the duplex DNA. 15. The method of claim 7, wherein said defined se of nucleic acid sequences are all possible sequentia combinations of a number of deoxyribonucleotides, N, wherein N is less than 20 and more than 2. 16. The method of claim 15, wherein N is less than 10 and more than 2. 17. The method of claim 16, wherein N is 4. 18. A screening system for identifying molecules that are capable of binding to a test sequence in a target duplex DNA sequence, comprising a duplex DNA having screening and test sequences adjacent one another, a DNA binding protein that is effective in binding to said screening sequence in the duplex DNA with a binding affinity that is substantially independent of said test sequence adjacent the screening sequence, but which is sensitive to binding of molecules to said test sequence, wherein the binding protein is present in molar excess over the screening sequence present in the duplex DNA, and means for detecting the amount of binding protein bound to the DNA. 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the tes sequences are selected from the group consisting of EB origin of replication, HSV origin of replication, VZ origin of replication, HPV origin of replication interleukin 2 enhancer, HIV-LTR, HBV enhancer, an fibrinogen promoter. 20. The system of claim 18, where the test sequence are selected from a defined set of nucleic acid sequences 21. The system of claim 20, wherein said defined se of DNA sequences has [X N ] N combinations, where X N i sequence of deoxyribonucleotides and the number o deoxyribonucleotides in each sequence is N, N is greate than or equal to three. 22. The system of claim 21, where sai deoxyribonucleotides are selected from the group consistin of deoxyr iboadenos ine , deoxyriboguanos ine , deoxyribocytidine, and deoxyribothymidine. 23. The system of claim 21, wherein N is 3-20. 24. The system of claim 23, wherein N is 4-10. 25. The system of claim 24, wherein N is 4 and th number of combinations is 256. 26. The system of claim 18, where the screenin sequence/binding protein is selected from the grou consisting of EBV origin of replication/EBNA, HSV origin o replication/UL9, VZV origin of replication/UL9-like, an HPV origin of replication/E2, and lambda o L -o R /cro. 27. The system of claim 26, wherein the DNA screenin seguence is from the HSV origin of replication and th binding protein is UL9. 28. The system of claim 27, wherein the DNA screenin sequence is selected from the group consisting of SEQ I NO:l, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:15 and SEQ ID NO:17. 29. The system of claim 28, where the DNA screenin sequence is SEQ ID NO:l. 30. The system of claim 29, where the U residue i position 8 is biotinylated. 31. The system of claim 30, where said detectio means includes streptavidin, and the streptavidin is boun to a solid support. 32. The system of claim 31, where streptavidin is used to capture the duplex DNA when it is free of bound protein. 33. A method for inhibiting the binding of a DNA- binding protein to duplex DNA, comprising contacting a compound with a duplex DNA which contains a test sequence adjacent a screening sequence, where the DNA binding protein is effective to bind to the screening sequence with a binding affinity that is substantially independent of said test sequence, further where the binding of said compound to the test sequence inhibits the binding of the protein to the screening sequence. 34. The method of claim 33, wherein the compound is identified by the steps of preparing a series of duplex nucleic acid fragments. each containing a test sequence composed of one of the 4 possible permutations of sequences in a sequence of bas pairs having N-basepairs, where said test sequence i adjacent the screening sequence, measuring the binding affinity of the DNA bindin protein to each of the series of nucleic acid fragments i the presence of the compound, and selecting the compound if it lowers the bindin affinity of the DNA binding protein for the screenin sequence.

Inventors: ANDREWS BETH M, CANTOR CHARLES R, EDWARDS CYNTHIA A, ANDREWS, BETH, M., CANTOR, CHARLES, R., EDWARDS, CYNTHIA, A.
Applicants: GENELABS INC, GENELABS INCORPORATED
Application year: 1992
Main classification: C12Q1
IPC codes: C07K14, C12N15, C12Q1