A METHOD FOR NON-LINEAR SIGNAL PROCESSING IN AN ECHO CANCELLER

Abstract: The invention relates to a non-linear signal processing in an echo canceller. According to the invention, the level of the signals passing through the echo canceller from the near end to the far end is attenuated to a predetermined blocking level, when the level of the near end signals is lower than a given threshold level. The level of the signal passing through the echo canceller from the near end to the far end is raised in a ramp-like manner from said blocking level back to the normal level (TSUP), when the level (LSin) of the near end signals agains exceeds the given threshold level or in a double talk situation.

Description: A method for non-linear signal processing in an echo canceller Field of the Invention The invention relates to a method for non-line¬ ar signal processing in an echo canceller, in which method the level of the signals passing through the echo canceller from the first end of a transmission connection to the second end is attenuated to a pre- determined blocking level, when the level of the first end signals entering the echo canceller is low¬ er ithan a given threshold level, and the level of the signals passing through the echo canceller from the first end to the second end is raised back to the normal unattenuated level, when the level of the first end signals entering the echo cancellers again exceeds the given threshold level or when a double talk situation is detected. Background of the Invention End-to-end connections of a data transmission system, such as a telephone network, often show long transit time delays, in consequence of which echo is observed for instance in the case of normal speech, when a signal is reflected from the far end of a con¬ nection back to the talker. An echo canceller is an analog or digital device for processing a signal, such as a speech signal, which device is used for reducing echo by subtracting estimated echo from the echo (signal) occurring in the connection. An echo canceller may comprise a non-linear processor, which only allows a passage of signals ex¬ ceeding a given threshold level and blocks a passage of low-level signals, as is illustrated by a charac- teristic curve in Figure 2. Non-linear processing is used for lowering the level of a residual echo caused by an incomplete echo cancellation. This results in a better overall attenuation (total attenuation con¬ sisting of echo path attenuation, echo cancellation attenuation and non-linear processing). Incomplete echo cancellation is possible if "considerable non-linear distortion occurs on the echo path (many PCM coders on the echo path, for in¬ stance). Combined quantized distortion may prevent the echo canceller from producing an echo signal with sufficiently low level at the output port of the echo canceller. Therefore, it is often advantageous to use a non-linear processor, though not absolutely neces¬ sary. In an ideal case a non-linear processor does not cause distortion in the speech signal coming from the near end, i.e. from the direction of the echo path. In practical applications, however, distortion may occur, in which situation it is to be recommended to shunt the non-linear processor during double talk (both ends are talking) and near end talk conditions. The threshold level used in a non-linear pro¬ cessor for signal blocking decisions may be either fixed or adaptive. A fixed threshold level may be determined on the basis of the achieved echo cancel¬ lation, speech levels and line conditions. As a gen¬ eral rule, the threshold level shall be set about a few dB higher than the peak levels of the residual echo occurring when the echo cancellation is in oper- ation. A good compromise can be achieved by employing a threshold level adaptive to the line conditions and speech levels. By using a high threshold level an un- desired exceeding of the threshold level caused by high-level residual echo is prevented, and by using a low threshold level a distortion of speech during interruptions in speech is reduced. Disclosure of the Invention The object of the invention is a method for signal processing by means of a non-linear processor in such a manner that the resulting interference will be minimized. This is achieved by a method characterized in that the level of the signals passing through the echo canceller is raised ramp-like from said blocking level to said given threshold level during a prede¬ termined time. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the non-linear processing is terminated by raising the signal level ramp-like, preferably linearly, from the blocking level to the threshold level instead of affecting the level change as a rapid step. By means of such a "smoothening" , the little audible stir caused by a quick change in the signal level can be avoided in the telephone channel. In another embodiment of the invention, a ramp¬ like raise of the signal level does not start until after a given guard period from the moment when a near end signal exceeds said threshold level. By using the guard period, at least two significant ad¬ vantages are achieved. Firstly, the guard period is used in order that a signal, still propagating on the echo path, will have time to enter the echo canceller before the termination of the non-linear processing and thereby will not be passed through the echo can¬ celler to the far end. Secondly, an echo path model created by the echo canceller especially in a noisy signal environment tends to diverge a little at the end stage of the far end speech, when the signal lev- el of the far end is falling, and this would also cause echo at the far end at the termination of the non-linear processing, if there were no guard period. Echo would occur in this case after a pause in the far end speech, because due to divergence, the echo path model would not be accurate enough any longer. In a case of double talk situation, non-linear processing shall be switched off more quickly, and therefore, no guard period is used when double talk is observed, but the non-linear processing is switch- ed off immediately by ramp-like termination only. Brief Description of the Drawings The invention will be explained in the follow¬ ing in greater detail by means of embodiments with reference to the attached drawings, in which Figure 1 shows a block diagram of an echo can¬ celler according to the invention, Figure 2 shows a transfer function of a non¬ linear processor, Figure 3 shows a change in operating modes of the non-linear processor as a function of signal lev¬ els sln and L Rln , Figures 4A-B and 4C-D illustrate a switching off of the non-linear processor by using a ramp ac- cording to the invention and without it, respective¬ ly. Figures 5A-B and 5C-D illustrate a switching off of the non-linear processor by using a guard pe¬ riod according to the invention and without it, and Figure 6 is a graph illustrating a switching on of the non-linear processor. Detailed Description of the Invention Figure 1 shows a digital echo canceller, to which the invention can be applied. The echo cancel¬ ler comprises an input port S ln and an output port S out of a digital signal to be transmitted as well as an input port R in and an output port R out of a digital signal to be received. The echo canceller shall eli¬ minate the echo only in the transmission direction, in this application called far end (the echo cancel¬ ler can alternatively be constructed to eliminate the echo in the receiving direction) . The opposite direc- tion is called near end. The ports S in and R out are connected to the transmission path of the near end and the ports S out and R in to the transmission path of the far end. The echo to be cancelled is a component r(i) of a speech signal x(i) received at the port R in from the far end and transmitted forward over the port R out to the near end (to the echo path) , which component is reflected from the near end. A transmission signal y(i) of the near end is linearized by an A-law converter 35A, processed by means of an adaptive FIR filter 21 and finally ap¬ plied to a change-over switch S 1. The switch S 1 controlled by a control unit 26 connects the output of the filter 21 either over a non-linear processor 27 or an A-law converter 36 to the output port S out of the echo canceller. The adaptive digital filter 21 is for instance a digital transversal filter, which models an impulse response of the echo path. A control unit 22 controls the operation, adaptation and updating of the adap- tive filter 21 on the basis of the levels of the sig¬ nals y(i) and x(i), which levels are obtained by means of level detectors 24 and 25, respectively, and on the basis of a disable tone detection, which is performed by means of a disable tone detection cir- cuitry 37. The signal x(i) is linearized by A-law convert¬ ers 35B, 35C and 35D, before being applied to a sam¬ ple buffer 23, the level detector 25 and the disable tone detection circuitry 37, respectively. Samples taken from the signal x(i) are stored in the sample buffer 23, from which they are applied, if needed, to the filter 21 for the calculation of a correlation between them and samples taken from the signal y(i). Coefficients a k of the filter 21 are updated on the basis of this correlation. As the schematical transfer function in Figure 2 illustrates, the non-linear processor 27 only passes through signals exceeding a given threshold level T sup and received at the port S in from the near end and blocks a passage of low-level signals. This has been realized in the embodiment of Figure 1 in such a way that, on signal levels L sin higher than the threshold value T sup , the change-over switch S 1 shunts (by-passes) the processor 27 by connecting the output signal of the filter 21 to the output port S out via the A-law converter 36, i.e. non-linear processing is not used. On signal levels L sln lower than the threshold level T sup , the change-over switch S 1 connects the output signal of the filter 21 to the processor 27 for non-linear processing. Non-linear processing means that a passage of a signal is blocked in prac¬ tice by attenuating the level of the signal passed through the processor 27 irrespective of the level of the input signal to a given low blocking level. For instance, the attenuation of the processor 27 is such that the residual echo at the port S out is smaller than -65 dBmO. The change-over switch SW1 is controlled by the control unit 26 on the basis of the output level of the filter 21, which level is detected by a level de- tector 28, and of a signal level L Rin received at the port R in , which level is detected by the level detec¬ tor 25. The output level of the filter 21 represents in this case the signal level L sin received at the port S in from the near end. On the other hand, the signal level L Rin is equal to the level of the far end signal transmitted over the port R out to the near end (and to the echo path), which level causes an echo signal at the port S in . Figure 2 illustrates how the non-linear proces¬ sor 27 is connected between two operating modes de¬ pending on the signal levels L Rin and L sin . The L Rln ,L sin level is subdivided into two ranges, and Z. Within the range W the processor 27 is switched off (shunt- ed) and within the range Z the processor 27 is on. A condition for a proper operation of non-linear pro¬ cessing within both ranges is a correct detection of double talk (both ends are talking) and near end talk. The dynamic properties of non-linear processing are determined on the basis of the time periods need¬ ed for transitions between the ranges W and Z accord¬ ing to the four transition alternatives 1 to 4 shown in Figure 3. Transition 1 from W to Z. In this case L sin oc¬ curs at first and is constant, while Rin rises so high that the non-linear processor 27 is switched on. Since this causes distortion in the speech signal y(i) of the near end, the transition must not be car- ried out too quickly. Transition 2 from Z to W. In this case L Rin has exceeded the level L sin (constant) and the non-linear processor 27 is on. After that L Rin falls. The non-li¬ near processor 27 shall be on long enough to elimi- nate the echo still existing on the echo path. Transition 3 from Z to W. This transition oc¬ curs in the case of double talk. The non-linear pro¬ cessor 27 shall be switched off as soon as possible after double talk has been observed in order that the near end speech would not be distorted. Transition 4 from W to Z. In this case L Rin is constant and L sill detected, but falling. Transition 4 shall favour the continuity of the signal y(i) in or¬ der that it would not be distorted. An elimination or reduction of disturbances during the transitions 2 and 3 is provided according to the invention in such a way that an attenuation A HLP of the non-linear processor 27 is reduced ramp-like, preferably linearly, from the maximum value MAX to the minimum value MIN (the signal level at the port S out rises ramp-like to the threshold level T sop , re¬ spectively) during a given time period T x counted from the moment at which L sin again exceeds the threshold level T sup or a double talk situation is detected, as illustrated in Figures 4A and 4B. Figures 4C and 4D show a similar situation with a sudden stepwise change in attenuation without the ramp of the time period x according to the invention. The time x can be for instance 100 milliseconds. In another embodiment of the invention is addi¬ tionally employed a special guard period T 2 from the moment at which L sin exceeds the threshold level L sup to the start of the ramp-like attenuation A HLP and the change in the level of the signal passed through, as illustrated in Figures 5A and 5B. In the case of double talk, the guard period T 2 is not used. The guard period T 2 prevents, for instance, a passage of momentary echo peaks over the non-linear processor 27 to the far end. Figures 5C and 5D illustrate the sit- uation in which the guard period T 2 according to the invention and the "smoothening ramp" T 1 are not used. Figure 6 illustrates a prevention of distur¬ bance in a situation according to transition 4 when the non-linear processor 27 is switched on. The threshold level T sup ranges within a level range from -35 dBmO to -40 dBmO, in the example case the level is -36 dBmO, which is so low that it is not possible in practice to hear the switching on of the non-line¬ ar processor 27 in the telephone channel. A quick change from a lower threshold level would cause an audible disturbance in the telephone channel. The threshold level T sup may also be adaptive to the echo path, for instance as follows: T sup = L Rin - (18±3)dB. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, all the blocks shown in Figure 1 are realized by a software in a digital signal processor. The invention has above been described in con¬ nection with certain exemplifying echo canceller types and digital transversal filters. The method of the invention can, however, be applied to all echo cancellers. The figures and the description relating to them are only intended to illustrate the present in- vention, anyway. As to the details, the method of the invention can vary within the scope of the attached claims.

Claims: Claims : 1. A method for non-linear signal processing in an echo canceller, in which method the level of the signals passing through the echo canceller from the first end of a transmission connection to the second end is attenuated to a predetermined blocking level, when the level of the first end signals entering the echo canceller is lower than a given threshold level, and the level of the signals passing through the echo canceller from the first end to the far end is raised back to the normal unattenuated level, when,the level of the first end signals entering the echo cancellers again exceeds the given threshold level or when a double talk situation is detected, c h r a c ¬ t e r i z e d in that the level of the signals pass¬ ing through the echo canceller is raised ramp-like from said blocking level to said given threshold lev¬ el during a predetermined time. 2. A method according to claim 1, c h a r a c¬ t e r i z e d in that a ramp-like raise of the level from the blocking level does not start until after a predetermined guard period has expired from the mo¬ ment at which said given threshold level was exceeded again. 3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that the signal level is raised from the blocking level to said given threshold level during a period of about 100 milli- seconds. 4. A method according to claim 1, 2 or 3, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that said guard period is about 80 milliseconds. 5. A method according to any of the preceding claims, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that said given threshold level is a fixed threshold level, ranging from 35 to 40 dBmO. 6. A method according to any of the claims 1 to 4, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that said given threshold level is adaptive depending on the level of the signal transmitted to the echo path. 7. A method of any of the preceding claims, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that a double talk sit¬ uation is observed, when the signal level received from the first end exceeds the level being 3 dB lower than the level of the signal transmitted to the echo path.

Inventors: LAEHDEMAEKI HEIMO, LAEHDEMAEKI, HEIMO
Applicants: NOKIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS OY
Application year: 1992
Main classification: H04B3
IPC codes: H04B3