Method and apparatus for processing manure

Abstract: The invention relates to a method for processing manure, liquid manure and/or Kjeldahl-N containing waste water being subjected to a nitrification in an aerated reactor containing active sludge and to a denitrification in a high rate recirculation denitrification reactor (13) containing a very compact biomass capable of converting nitrate to nitrogen gas. The loading of the nitrification reactor (9) being controlled to obtain an optimal nitrification and denitrification, the effluent from the nitrification reactor (9) partially being passed to the recirculation denitrification reactor (13), adding a source of carbon to the effluent to be passed to the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) and passing another portion of the effluent stream from the nitrification reactor (9) to a separation step (19) to separate a sludge, the effluent from separation step (19) being passed to a discharge line denitrification reactor (37) under the addition of a carbon source if desired. The invention further relates to an apparatus constructed for this purpose.

Description: The present invention relates to a method for processing manure, liquid manure and/or Kjeldahl-N containing waste water being subjected to a nitrification in a first step and to denitrification in a subsequent step, in an aerated reactor which contains active sludge rich in nitrifying bacteria being used in the nitrification step and acid-neutralizing chemicals being added to said reactor if necessary and a high rate denitrification reactor which contains a very compact biomass which is capable of converting nitrate to nitrogen gas and to which an organic substrate is added being used in the denitrification step. A method of this type is known from, inter alia, Agrarisch Dagblad of 14 March 1988. With this method the liquid fraction of fermented semi-liquid manure is treated. The biologically degradable organic substances, nitrifiable nitrogen and phosphorus which are present in the liquid fraction of anaerobic or fermented semi-liquid manure can be largely removed. The method essentially consists in a coupling of a nitrification step in a nitrification reactor in which ammonia is converted by bacteria to oxidized nitrogen with a denitrification step in a denitrification reactor in which oxidized nitrogen is converted by bacteria to nitrogen gas, the phosphate present in the liquid being concentrated as a chemical precipitate in the reactor at the same time. Oxidation of ammonia results in lowering of the pH, which can be countered by metering in lime and/or metering in effluent from the denitrification reactor (recycling) to the nitrification reactor. During the nitrification step there will also be some removal of nitrogen and phosphate by means of nitrogen and phosphate incorporation in the new cells of the active sludge. This nitrogen and phosphate was liberated during the fermentation of the manure whereby degradable substances yield CO₂ and CH₄. With the known method the nitrification reactor (which can be either a fed batch reactor or a batch reactor) is operated batchwise. It is then aerated until all ammonia has been nitrified, after which the aeration is stopped temporarily in order to allow the sludge to settle. The nitrified liquid manure is run off for treatment in the denitrification step, while the active sludge remains behind in the nitrification reactor for a subsequent cycle. In the denitrification step the effluent from the nitrification reactor is pumped upwards through a USB (upflow slib bed) reactor. In this reactor there is a very compact biomass which is capable of converting nitrate to nitrogen gas. In order to allow this step to proceed, an organic substrate - for example methanol - must be added to the reactor. Acid is consumed during the denitrification step, as a result of which the pH in the bacterial bed rises. As a consequence of this rise, an insoluble precipitate of phosphate with the calcium ions present in the liquid forms. The manure processing consisting of manure fermentation and separation of fermented manure, followed by the method for treatment of the liquid fraction of fermented semi-liquid manure, which has been described above, is shown in Figure 1. (The numerals of this and the following figures being explaind in Table A). A number of manure processing works are being developed at present, for example Promest in Helmond. In these works semi-liquid manure is evaporated to give a dry product, which costs a great deal of energy since semi-liquid manure consists of more than 90% water. Moreover, this evaporation is a complex technology which in fact still has to be developed for use on manure. The cost price of processing of this type for the formation of dry granular or powder manure is subsequently very high. An approach which differs from that described above is the treatment of semi-liquid manure in conventional effluent treatment installations. Currently this is also being used for treatment of liquid manure from calves. The conventional manure treatment has the significant disadvantages that the process produces a large amount of sludge (excess bacteria) and that the process is not capable of removing the phosphate. This means that extra provisions have to be made for sludge treatment and dephosphating. A conventional manure treatment also requires a fairly large amount of space. The method, reported in Agrarisch Dagblad of 17 March 1988, has the advantage that it is relatively inexpensive and can be carried out in a compact installation. However, a number of problems also arise in the known method in the treatment of fermented manure. A compact manure treatment installation for manure and fermented manure or Kjeldahl-N containing waste water can be produced and maintained only if: a) the metering of the fermented liquid fraction is matched to the nitrification capacity of the nitrification reactor. The nitrification reactor must not be overloaded but must also not operate underloaded. b) The metering of methanol (or other sources of carbon) to the denitrification reactor is matched to the nitrate load in the denitrification reactor. In the case of undermetering not all nitrate is removed; in the case of overmetering, however, methanol (or other source of carbon) is present in the effluent to be discharged. c) The effluent recycling from denitrification reactor to nitrification reactor is controlled such that it is optimal. Too little recycling leads to a nitrate concentration which has an inhibitory effect on the bacteria; too much recycling has the consequence that the reactor is filled mainly with liquid which has already been treated. Said points can be achieved by the use of separate instruments, it being necessary to carry out some of the operations by hand. Moreover, the results of the various measurements cannot be integrated and translated into a control action without the intervention of an operator. Furthermore, the effluent from the nitrification reactor can still contain organic substances which cannot be further degraded in the nitrification reactor. Organic material which passes into the denitrification reactor can be converted into inorganic material in that reactor with the liberation of ammonium nitrogen which is then (insofar as it is not fed via the recirculation stream) discharged with the effluent. In copending European application 90.202728.3 (a document according to Article 54.3 EPC) directed at a method of the type indicated in the preamble characterized in that the loading of the nitrification reactor is controlled and the optimal nitrification and denitrification are obtained on the basis of one or more of the following data: the incoming nitrogen load; the information from the WAZU respiration meter (Netherlands Patent Application No. 8600396, filed on 17 February 1986); the pH in the nitrification reactor, the criterion for which is that it is in the range limited by 6 and 8.5; the amount of air required the residence time the temperature in both the nitrification reactor and the denitrification reactor, the criterion for which is that this is lower than 40°C; the concentration of oxidized nitrogen in the influent for the denitrification reactor, the criterion for which is that the concentration is between 0 and 4 g N/l; the concentration of oxidized nitrogen in the nitrification reactor, the criterion for which in the sludge/liquid mixture in the reactor is that the concentration is between 0 and 4 g N/l; the concentration of the carbon source in the effluent from the denitrification reactor; the gas production in the denitrification reactor the abovementioned problems are addressed. An aspect of the process of the copending European application is that an instrument, a respiration meter (WAZU respiration meter), with which the moments at which the treatment processes are complete can be established and with which both Kjeldahl N concentration in the liquid fraction of fermented manure to be treated and the nitrate concentration of the effluent from the nitrification reactor (= feed for the denitrification reactor) can be calculated, can be used. However, it should be noticed that the use of such a respiration meter is not required. The other data mentioned are also sufficient for a good control of the process. The liquid streams and control lines in relation to the respiration meter are shown schematically in Figure 2 in a further embodiment of the copending European patent application. The respiration meter can control the entire method automatically on the basis of the data collated and calculated by the instrument. However, as already mentioned, such a respiration meter is certainly not necessary. The nitrification is followed by a denitrification process. Furthermore, the optimal conditions for the treatment methods have been investigated in both the nitrification and the denitrification reactor. The biomasses in both the nitrification reactor and the denitrification reactor produce heat. Because of the high concentration of biomass and the high rates of conversion which are realized in both reactors, there will be a net excess of heat in both reactors if no measures are taken. It was found in laboratory experiments, that for a nitrifying bacterial population the optimal temperature of this bacterial population is between 31 and 35°C and that the maximum temperature which can be tolerated is 40°C. On the basis of general scientific information, it can be anticipated that the same temperature limits apply for the denitrifying bacterial population. Thermophilic denitrifying bacteria are known. These operate at temperatures above about 50°C. However, for various reasons it is not desirable to use thermophilic organisms in the denitrification reactor: the effluent to be discharged will be much too warm and the recirculation stream to the nitrification reactor may not be too warm. Both the nitrification and the denitrification reactor can be operated only if there is a provision for removal of heat from the respective reactor contents. For the method according to the copending application, the conditions in the denitrification reactor must be kept such that phosphate can precipitate. The efficiency of the phosphate removal is dependent on the pH and the HCO₃⁻/CO₃²⁻ ratio in the denitrification reactor. The desired pH can be obtained by using an organic carbon source for the denitrification reactor with a specific chemical oxygen consumption (COC)/total organic carbon (TOC) ratio in the present method. The fact is that alkalinity (alkali, bicarbonate and carbonate) is produced in the denitrification reactor under the influence of the denitrification reaction. The production of alkalinity is dependent on the COC/TOC ratio of the organic C source in the denitrification reaction. Usually methanol is used as organic C source. Methanol has a high COC/TOC ratio and results in a higher production of alkalinity than, for example, glucose, which has a much lower COC/TOC ratio. Experiments have shown that the COC/TOC ratio must be 3.75 or below. As stated, the pH falls in the nitrification reactor on the oxidation of the ammonia. To counter acidification of the reactor, alkali can be metered in or effluent can be recycled from the denitrification reactor to the nitrification reactor. It has been established experimentally that the concentration of oxidized nitrogen in the nitrification reactor in the sludge/liquid mixture is between 0 and 4 g N/l and preferably is in the range limited by 0 and 1.5 g N/l. Furthermore, it has been found that the concentration of oxidized nitrogen in the influent for the denitrification reactors is between 0 and 4 g N/l and is preferably between 1.0 and 1.4 g N/l. In order to achieve this, the effluent from the denitrification reactor can be recycled. This recycling provides dilution of the concentration of oxidized nitrogen at the feed location in the reactor. Furthermore, this recycling is intended to obtain a higher stream velocity in the denitrification reactor, which promotes the contact between biomass and substrate in the reactor. Recycling can take place directly from effluent stream to influent stream for the denitrification reactor. It is, however, also possible (and in fact better for the overall process) for recycling of effluent from the denitrification reactor entirely or partially via the nitrification reactor. The aim of this is then to achieve both a saving in the chemicals consumption for pH control and a dilution of the reactor contents of the nitrification reactor such that the content of oxidized nitrogen is always lower than 4 g N/l. Another aspect is the use of a separation step, e.g. a physical/chemical flocculation step and a floccule separator or a membrane technology after the nitrification step. Purpose of said separation previous to the denitrification reactor is catching suspended and colloidally dissolved organic substances, that otherwise would mineralize in the denitrification reactor resulting in the formation of ammonia nitrogen. A physical/chemical flocculation step plus floccule separation is shown schematically in Figure 3. The residual organic substance can be removed from the effluent with the aid of flocculating adjuvants and a process for separation of the flocculant from the effluent. By positioning upstream of the denitrification step, the organic substances can be removed before they are converted to inorganic substances and ammonium nitrogen is formed. A further advantage of this is that the carbonate content in the effluent from the nitrification reactor is low (lower than in the effluent from the denitrification) reactor, to which organic substrate is added). This is advantageous if a flocculating adjuvant is used which forms a precipitate with carbonate. If a flocculating adjuvant is used which contains cations which precipitate with phosphate such as Ca²⁺ Fe²⁺ ,Fe3+, Mg2+ and/or Al³⁺ an additional phosphate removal is performed. The copending application also relates to an installation which is suitable for carrying out the method as described above, comprising: a nitrification reactor which is provided with aeration, feed of liquid to be treated, feed of acid-neutralizing chemicals, active sludge rich in nitrifying bacteria, sludge discharge, effluent discharge; a line through which the effluent from the reactor can be fed to the denitrification reactor; a denitrification reactor which is provided with feed of effluent from the nitrification reactor, feed of a carbon source, an upflow slib bed (USB) column, a very compact biomass capable of converting nitrate to nitrogen gas, phosphate-rich sludge discharge, effluent discharge, nitrogen gas discharge; a line through which the effluent from the denitrification reactor can be discharged. In the most simple form, the installation (shown schematically in Figure 2) consists of the combination of a batch reactor (to which all influent (7) is added at once per cycle) or a fed batch reactor (to which the influent is added gradually or stepwise per cycle) as nitrification reactor (9) and a continuously fed upflow slib bed (USB) reactor as denitrification reactor (13). The two reactors are operated connected in series, without bypass of the nitrification reactor (9) but optionally with backmixing (33) from the denitrification reactor (13) to the nitrification reactor (9). The use of the WAZU respiration meter (18) (Netherlands Patent Application 86.00396, filed on 6 February 1986), a measurement and control unit with which the course of the respiration rate of the biomass in the reactor (9) is followed, is characteristic of the installation according to the copending application. The nitrification reactor (9) of the apparatus is provided with aeration (10), a feed of liquid (7) to be treated, a sludge discharge (11), effluent discharge and optionally a feed of effluent from the denitrification reactor (33), all of which are controlled by the WAZU respiration meter (18) (Netherlands Patent Application 86.00396, filed on 6 February 1986). This respiration meter also controls the metering of the source of carbon (14) for the denitrification reactor (13). This denitrification reactor is additionally provided with nitrogen gas discharge (17) and effluent recirculation (33) or discharge (16) (see figures 2 and 5). Another embodiment of the installation according to the copending application (shown schematically in Figure 4) is also provided with a line (32) through which the effluent from the denitrification reactor (13) can be partially recycled to the effluent (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) which serves a influent for the denitrification reactor (13) and additionally this installation is provided with a feed of one or more acid-neutralizing chemicals (8) to the nitrification reactor (9). Furthermore, the apparatus can comprise a combination of the two above installations (Figures 4 and 5), i.e. an installation as shown in Figure 6, this installation being provided with lines through which the effluent (16) from the denitrification reactor (13) can be partially recycled (lines 33 and 32 respectively) to the nitrification reactor (9) and to the effluent (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) which serves a influent for the denitrification reactor (13). The three lastmentioned installations, shown in Figures 4, 5 and 6, can comprise a further addition (see Figure 7) in the form of a feed of chemicals for phosphate precipitation (20). Furthermore, all of these installations (shown in Figures 4, 5, 6 and 7) can be provided with one or more separation or flocculation installations (19). The flocculation installation as such is shown schematically in Figure 3. The embodiment of the apparatus according to the copending application which have already been described can be provided with the flocculation installations at various locations (Figures 8, 9 and 10). In the installation according to Figure 8, the flocculation installation (19) is positioned in such a way that the effluent (16) from the denitrification reactor (13) flows through the flocculation installation (19 and Figure 3) upstream of the recycle (34, 35) or discharge (22). In the installation according to the copending application as illustrated in Figure 9, the flocculation installation (19) is positioned in such a way that only the effluent (16) from the denitrification reactor (13) which is to be discharged flows through the flocculation installation (19). In the installation according to the copending application as illustrated in Figure 10, which is preferred, the flocculation installation (19) is positioned in such a way that the effluent (12) originating from the nitrification reactor (9) flows through the flocculation installation (19) before it flows into the denitrification reactor (13). The apparatus according to the copending application in which the nitrification reactor is provided with feed of the effluent (33 or 34) from the denitrification reactor (13) can be provided with a spray installation (25 in Figure 10) through which the effluent (33 or 34) from the denitrification reactor (13) can be sprayed into the nitrification reactor (9) to prevent foam formation. Furthermore, all installations according to the copending application can be provided with one or more buffer tanks (23) (Figure 10). In the above process, all effluent (12) from the nitrification reactor passes through the separator (19), this means a high load for the separator. It has now been found that an improvement can be reached by partially recirculating the effluent (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) to a recirculation denitrification reactor (13), adding a source of carbon to the effluent to be passed to the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) and passing part of the effluent stream (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) to a separation unit (19) to separate sludge, the effluent (36) from the separation step (19) being passed to another denitrification reactor (37). This other denitrification reactor (37) shall be referred to as the discharge line denitrification reactor (37). When necessary a source carbon can be added to the discharge line denitrification reactor (37). The effluent (38) from the discharge line denitrification reactor (37) can be discarded. Surprisingly it has been found, that sludge present in the effluent (12) recirculated to the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) and subsequently recirculated to the nitrification reactor (9) has no disadvantageous effect on the process. The process described in the copending application can be improved by using two different types of denitrification reactors; the discharge line denitrifaction reactor (37) and the recirculation denitrification reactor (13). The effluent (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) is partially passed from the nitrification reactor to the recirculation denitrification reactor (13). An organic carbon source can be added to the influent of this denitrification reactor (13) in order to provide sufficient organic carbon substrate for the denitrification reaction in said reactor (13). In the lay-out of the apparatus of the invention it is no longer detrimental if the effluent of the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) still contains a small amount of nitrate. This because the effluent (33) from this reactor (13) is passed to the nitrification reactor (9). The metering of the organic carbon source in this denitrification reactor (13) is less critical than in the process of the copending application. By using two different types of denitrification reactors it is also possible to add the feed at the influent of the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) i.e. between where the effluent stream (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) is split to (12) and (39) and the recirculation denitrification reactor (13). By doing this it is possible to use the organic material which is in the feed as a carbon source for the denitrification process thereby eliminating the need for a separate carbon source (14) before the recirculation denitrification reactor (13). The ammonium in the feed will pass unchanged through the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) and will be added by the recirculation stream (33) at the nitrification reactor (9). Here the ammonium will be oxidized to nitrate. Most of the oxidizable organic matter in the feed stream will be used for denitrification. If there is still some oxidizable organic matter left in the effluent stream (33) of the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) this organic matter will be oxidized in the nitrification reactor (9). The other part of the effluent (12) of the nitrification reactor (9) is passed to the discharge line denitrification reactor (37). An organic carbon source can also be supplied to the influent of the discharge line denitrification reactor (37). Of course it is not advisable to use part of the influent to be treated according to the process of the invention as organic carbon source as the effluent (38) of this discharge line denitrification reactor (37) is to be discarded whilst still containing the Kjeldahl nitrogen that should be removed. This embodiment using part of the influent of the system can only be used in recirculation denitrification reactor (13). The flow diagram is shown in fig. 12. As already has been elucidated above, a separation step can be used for the removal of phosphates and suspended and colloidally dissolved organic substances. In the process of the invention with a recirculation denitrification reactor (13) and a discharge line denitrification reactor (37) the separation step (19) can be positioned before the discharge line denitrification reactor (37) and after the effluent (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) has been split into influent stream (39). The hydraulic load of the separation step is then much lower then in the copending application. This is shown in fig. 14. However, when the separation step (19) is placed downstream of the discharge line denitrification reactor (37) some ammonium and biodegradable soluble organic substances are still formed from organic material in the discharge line denitrification reactor (37). These soluble organic biodegradable substances and ammonium will pass unchanged through the separation step (19) and will be discarded. By placing the separation step (19) upstream of the discharge line denitrification reactor (37) the organic matter will be removed before passing through the discharge line denitrification reactor (37), so that no ammonium or soluble organic substances will be formed here. This is shown in figure 14. The effluent (12) of the nitrification reactor (9) will partially be put through the recirculation denitrification reactor (13). To this part of effluent (12) destined for the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) the feed with organic matter and ammonium will be added, so that the nitrate in this part of the effluent (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) will be denitrified here. The other part of the effluent (12) of the nitrification reactor (9) passes through the separation step (19), if this is necessary in view of pollution exigences. A carbon source is added to the effluent (36) of the separation step (e.g. methanol). This stream is than put through the discharge line denitrification reactor (37), where the nitrate is converted into nitrogen gas. The effluent (38) of this reactor is then discarded. This is shown in drawing 15. By adding the feed at the influent of the recirculation reactor (13) the recirculation ratio (= amount of influent for the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) without feed divided by the amount of feed) is determined by several points: the nitrate concentration in the nitrification reactor (9) should be less than 1.5 g N/l; the amount of alkalinity in the effluent (33) of the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) should be enough to counter acidification in the nitrification reactor (9); the use of an external carbon source (e.g. methanol should be limited; the hydraulic loading of the nitrification reactor (9) and the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) should not be too big. To meet these points it can be necessary to add a part of the feed at the nitrification reactor (9) and another part to the influent of the recirculation denitrification reactor (13). In this case it can be necessary to add also an external carbon source (14) such as methanol to the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) (Shown schematically in drawing 16). This process can be operated with or without a separation step. Furthermore, the process can be provided with one or more buffer tanks. The buffer tank (23) in which the effluent (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) is collected can be constructed like a sedimentation tank, so that surplus sludge from the nitrification reactor (9) can settle here and can be removed. The effluent from this buffer tank is partially passed through the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) and partially passed through the separation step (19). The effluent (33) from the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) can be collected in a buffer tank (23). This buffer tank can also be constructed like a sedimentation tank, so that sludge still present in the effluent (33) of the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) can settle here. This sludge (41) can be returned to the reactor, or can be removed as surplus sludge. The effluent from this buffer tank is put in the nitrification reactor. The effluent (33) of the discharge line denitrification reactor (13) can also be collected in a sedimentation tank. The sludge still present in the effluent (33) of the discharge line denitrification reactor can settle here and be returned to the denitrification reactor (41) or can be removed as surplus sludge (42). The effluent from this sedimentation tank will be discharged. This is schematically shown in drawing 17. It will be clear that this different lay out of the installation can be used with all the embodiments described above. According to a beneficial embodiment an amount of influent can be used as a carbon source. According to the present invention the separation unit (19) can use the conventional separation methods such as centrifugation, sedimentation and so forth, however, also the use of membrane technology is possible. In this case the filtration is applied followed by a phosphate removal by precipitation. Another possibility to remove organic material is chemical oxidation using ozon or hydrogen peroxyde, for instance. The invention is illustrated by means of the following example that only serves for illustrative purposes and is not limiting for the scope of the invention. Example Fermented manure (i.e. the liquid fraction obtained by centrifugation of anaerobic fermented liquid pig manure) is treated in the apparatus of fig. 11. Analysis of the fermented manure shows a COD concentration of 21000 mg/l, a nitrogen concentration of 6500 mg N/l and a phosphorus concentration of 275 mg P/l. The apparatus shown in fig. 11 consists of a nitrification reactor (9) having a usable volume of 50 m³, two recirculation denitrification reactors (13) which are positioned parallel to each other each having a usable sludge bed volume of 10 m³, a separator (19) comprising at least a pipe flocculator and a centrifuge and a discharge line denitrification reactor (37) having a usable sludge bed volume of 5 m³. The nitrification reactor in this example is a fed batch reactor with a stepwise addition (0,5 m³ of manure per step) of fermented manure. A total of 2 m³ is added in four steps. In the total cyclus of the nitrification reactor 8 m³ of effluent (33) of the recirculation denitrification reactors are supplied by sprayers proportionally distributed in time. After a total of 2 m³ fermented manure has been introduced in the nitrification reactor and all ammonium nitrogen has been nitrified the aeration is ended and activated sludge is allowed to sediment during sixty minutes. After the sedimentation period 10 m³ of the supernatant liquid is discharged as an effluent (12) of the nitrification reactor. Then a new cyclus is started wherein again 2 m³ of fermented manure and 8 m³ of effluent of the denitrification are added. A WAZU respiration meter (trade mark RA-1000 marketed by Manotherm) is coupled to the nitrification reactor to monitor the actual respiration velocity. Further the oxygen concentration in the nitrification reactor is monitored with an oxygen sensor. The blower which is used for the supply of oxygen by means of air is controlled by the oxygen concentration in the nitrification reactor. The oxygen concentration is kept at 2.0 mg/l. After addition of 0.5 m³ of fermented manure the actual respiration velocity increases and the blower velocity increases also to keep the oxygen concentration at 2.0 mg/l. When the ammonium added with the fermented manure is nitrified the actual respiration velocity decreases to the basis level and the blower velocity has to decrease as well. After falling underneath the setpoint for the respiration velocity and/or the setpoint for the blower velocity another 0.5 m³ of fermented manure is added to the nitrification reactor. Figure 18 gives the oxygen concentration and the blower velocity as a function of time. The average dose of the fermented manure in the present nitrification reactor was in this test was about 6 m³ a day. The pH value is also measured in the nitrification. Lime milk is supplied when the pH-value falls below 6.5. The temperature is also monitored and is kept at a value below 33°C by means of a heat exchanger. The effluent (12) of the nitrification reactor (9) has a nitrate-N concentration of 1100 mg N/l and a phosphate-P concentration of 125 mg P/l. The nitrate-N concentration is lower than could be expected on the basis of the dilution of the reactor contents with effluent from the denitrification reactor. This is the consequence of some denitrification in the nitrification reactor during the sedimentation period and the incorporation of nitrogen in the biomass. The effluent (12) of the nitrification reactor is collected in a buffertank (23). This tank is constructed like a sedimentation tank, so that sludge still present in the effluent (12) of the nitrification reactor, can sediment here. Four-fifths of the contents of the buffertank are put through two recirculation denitrification reactors (13) that have been arranged parallel. Methanol is added on the basis of the nitrate-N-concentration in the influent stream of the recirculation denitrification reactors (13). The methanol dose is about 1.65 kg/m³ influent of the denitrification reactor. The denitrification process is monitored by means of the gas production (1630 l/h). The pH-value of the recirculation denitrification reactors is between 9.0 and 9.3. The temperature is kept below 35°C by means of a heat exchanger. The effluent (33) of these two denitrification reactors is collected in a buffertank (23). From this buffertank the effluent is pumped through sprayers, which are situated on top of the nitrification reactor, or in the nitrification reactor. One fifth of the effluent (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) is used as influent stream 39 and is pumped through a separation system comprising at least a pipe flocculator. At the beginning of this flocculator a 38 w% (weight/weight) solution of FeCl₃ (iron(III)chloride) is dosed in an amount of 10 l/m³ effluent of the nitrification reactor (9). In the middle of the pipe flocculator lime milk or caustic soda is supplied untill the pH-value is 5.5. At the end of the pipe flocculator polyelectrolyte is dosed (180 mg per m³ effluent of the nitrification reactor). The liquid then passes through a centrifuge separating in a liquid stream (36) and a sludge stream (29). The sludge production is about 0.36 m³/d. The nitrate-N concentration and phosphate-P concentration in the effluent of the centrifuge amount to 1100 mg N/l an < 0.5 mg P/l respectively. The effluent (36) of the separation step (19) is then put through the discharge line denitrification reactor (37). Methanol is added on basis of the nitrate-N concentration in the influent stream. The denitrification proces is monitored by means of the gas production (408 l/h). The pH value is below 9.0. Temperature is kept below 35°C by means of a heat exchanger. The effluent (38) of the denitrification (37) is put through a sedimentation tank and is discharged. DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a process flow schematic of the prior art process for a method for treatment of semi-liquid manure; Figure 2 illustrates a control schematic of the WAZU respiration meter utilized in an embodiment of the copending European application; Figure 3 is a schematic illustrating a physical/chemical flocculation step and separation of the floccule; Figure 4 illustrates a process flow schematic of a further embodiment of the copending European application wherein partial recycling of effluent from the dinitrification reactor (13) can be partially recycled to serve as influent for said reactor; Figure 5 illustrates a slightly modified, different embodiment of the process of the copending European application similar to that illustrated in Figure 3, wherein effluent recirculation (33) from the denitrification reactor (13) to the nitrification reactor (9) is incorporated; Figure 6 illustrates a slightly modified, different embodiment of the process of the copending European application being a combination of that illustrated in Figures 4 and 5; Figure 7 illustrates a slightly modified, different embodiment of the process of the copending European application similar to that illustrated in Figures 4, 5 and 6 with a further addition in the form of a feed of chemicals for phosphate precipitation (20); Figure 8 illustrates a slightly modified, different embodiment of the process of the copending European application similar to that illustrated in Figures 4 - 7, including a separation or flocculation installation (19); Figure 9 illustrates a slightly modified, different embodiment of the process of the copending European application similar to that illustrated in Figures 4 - 8; Figure 10 is a process flow schematic diagram illustrating in more detail the preferred embodiment of the copending European application; Figure 11 illustrates a process flow, schematic diagram of the process of the present invention with recirculation denitrification reactors (13) and a discharge line denitrification reactor (37) including buffer tanks (23) and a separation step (19) prior to the discharge line denitrification reactor (37); and Figure 12 illustrates a simple embodiment of the process of the present invention; Figure 13 illustrates a process according to the invention wherein the separation or flocculation step (19) is located downstream of the discharge line denitrification reactor (37); Figure 14 illustrates a process according to the invention wherein the separation or flocculation step (19) is located upstream of the discharge line denitrification reactor (37) and downstream of the nitrification reactor (9) in such a manner that only effluent to be discharged is subjected to separation or flocculation; Figure 15 illustrates a process according to the invention wherein the feed of organic matter and ammonium (7) is added to effluent of the nitrification reactor (9) destined for the recirculation denitrification reactor (13); Figure 16 illustrates a process according to the invention wherein feed (7) is added at the nitrification reactor (9) and the recirculation denitrification reactor (13); Figure 17 illustrates a process according to the invention comprising buffer tanks and sedimentation tanks and a recirculation cycle of effluent from the discharge line denitrification reactor (37) to the influent of the discharge line denitrification reactor (37); Figure 18 illustrates a process cycle for the process of the present invention including a plot of dissolved oxygen versus time for a single treatment cycle.

Claims: A method for processing manure, liquid manure and/or Kjeldahl-N containing waste water comprising subjecting the waste water to a nitrification in an aerated nitrification reactor (9), which contains active sludge rich in nitrifying bacteria for use in the nitrification step and which discharges effluent, subjecting part of the effluent from the nitrification reactor (9) to a denitrification in a recirculation denitrification reactor (13), which contains a very compact biomass which is capable of converting nitrate to nitrogen gas and to which an organic substrate is supplied, adding a source of carbon to the part of the effluent from the nitrification reactor (9) passed through the recirculation denitrification reactor (13), and recirculating effluent from said recirculation denitrification reactor to said nitrification reactor optionally after recirculation of said effluent to said recirculation denitrification reactor (13); passing the remaining part of the effluent from the nitrification reactor (9) to a separation step (19) to separate sludge, the effluent from the separation step (19) being passed to discharge line denitrification reactor (37) having means for an effluent discharge (38), a feed of carbon source and a nitrogen discharge (17), wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain a desired nitrification and denitrification. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that the effluent (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) is (first) passed through a buffer tank (23), provided with a) a means to remove sludge and b) a discharge leading to separation step (19) with a discharge leading to stream (36) leading to discharge line denitrification reactor (37) and buffer tank (23) and further being provided with c) a discharge (19) leading to stream (12) leading to recirculation denitrification reactor (13). A method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the effluent stream (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) passed to the separation step (19) is subjected to a physical chemical treatment such as flocculation. A method according to one of the claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the nitrification reactor used is a batch reactor or a fed batch reactor. A method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that chemicals for phosphate precipitation such as Ca2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Mg2+ and/or Al3+ are added to at least one of the denitrification reactors (13 and 37). A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the concentration of oxidized nitrogen in the influent for the denitrification reactors is maintained at 0-4 g N/l. A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the concentration of oxidized nitrogen in the nitrification reactor (9) is maintained at 0-4 g N/l. A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain the desired nitrification and denitrification on the basis of the incoming nitrogen load of the waste water. Method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain the desired nitrification and denitrification on the basis of the information from a WAZU respiration meter. A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain the disired nitrification and denitrification on the basis of the oxygen concentration in the nitrification reactor (9). A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain the disired nitrification and denitrification on the basis of the pH value in the nitrification reactor (9), the criterion for which is that the pH value is in the range limited by 6 and 8.5. A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain the desired nitrification and denitrification on the basis of the amount of air required by the nitrification reactor (9). A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain the desired nitrification and denitrification on the basis of the residence time. A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain the desired nitrification and denitrifiction by maintaining the temperature in both the nitrification reactor (9) and the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) below 40°C. A method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain the desired nitrification and denitrification on the basis of the concentration of oxidized nitrogen in the influent for the recirculation denitrification reactor (13), the criterion for which is that the concentration is between 1,0 and 1,4 g N/l. A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain the desired nitrification and denitrification on the basis of the concentration of oxidized nitrogen in the nitrification reactor (9), the criterion for which is that in the sludge/liquid mixture in the nitrification reactor (9) the concentration is between 0 and 1,5 g N/l. A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain the desired nitrification and denitrification on the basis of the concentration of the carbon source in the effluent from the recirculation denitrification reactor (13). A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the loading of the nitrification reactor (9) is controlled to obtain the desired nitrification and denitrification on the basis of the gas production in the recirculation denitrification reactor (13). An apparatus comprising: a nitrification reactor (9) having an aeration means (10), feed of liquid (7) to be treated, a feed of acid neutralizing chemicals, active sludge rich in nitrifying bacteria, a sludge discharge (11) and an effluent discharge (12); a recirculation denitrification reactor (13) having an inlet (12), a feed of a carbon source (14), a nitrogen discharge (17) and a recirculating effluent discharge (33) to the nitrification reactor (9) and optionally to the recirculation denitrification reactor (13); discharge line denitrification reactor (37) having an inlet, effluent discharge (38) and a nitrogen outlet (17); means for feeding a part of the effluent (12) from the nitrification reactor (9) to the inlet of the recirculation denitrification reactor (13) and the remaining part to a separation unit (19) having a sludge discharge (29) and an effluent discharge (36) connected with the inlet of the discharge line denitrification reactor (37). Apparatus according to claim 20, characterized in that it is provided with at least one buffer tank (23). Apparatus according to claim 20 or 21, characterized in that it is provided with a means for chemical phosphate precipitation (not shown) preferably arranged between separation step (19) and the discharge line denitrification reactor (37). Apparatus according to any of claims 20-22, characterized in that it is provided with means to catch and optionally remove sludge after a buffer tank and/or a denitrification reactor. Apparatus according to any of claims 20-23, characterized in that discharge (38) of the discharge line dinitrification reactor is provided with means to remove sludge. Apparatus according to any of claims 20-24, characterized in that it is provided with means to recirculate sludge from a buffer tank (23) to a recirculation denitrification reactor (13) and/or from a buffer tank (23) to the nitrification reactor (9) and/or from the discharge line denitrification reaction (37) via a buffer tank (23) to said discharge line denitrification reactor (37).

Inventors: KLAPWIJK ABRAHAM, KOSTER IMAN WILLEM, KLAPWIJK, ABRAHAM, KOSTER, IMAN WILLEM
Applicants: ECOTECHNIEK BV, ECOTECHNIEK B.V.
Application year: 1992
Main classification: C02F3
IPC codes: C02F3, C02F1