Imaging methods and apparatus

Abstract: A single-photon emission computed tomography system includes three gamma camera heads (22a), (22b), (22c) which are mounted to a gantry (20) for rotation about a subject (12). The subject is injected with a source of emission radiation, which emission radiation is received by the camera heads. A reconstruction processor (112) reconstructs the emission projection data into a distribution of emission radiation sources in the subject. Transmission radiation from a radiation source (30) passes through the subject and is received by one of the camera heads (22a) concurrently with the emission radiation. The transmission radiation data is reconstructed into a three-dimensional computed tomography type image representation of radiation attenuation characteristics of each pixel of the subject. An attenuation correction processor (118) corrects the emission projection data to compensate for attenuation along the path or ray that it traversed. In this manner, an attenuation corrected distribution of emission sources is generated.

Description: The present invention relates to imaging methods and systems. It finds particular application in conjunction with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with multi-headed cameras and will be described with particular reference thereto. It is to be appreciated, however, that the invention will also find application in other non-invasive investigation techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and other diagnostic modes in which a subject is examined for emitted radiation. Heretofore, single photon emission computed tomography has been used to study the radionuclide distribution in subjects. Typically, one or more radiopharmaceuticals were injected into a patient. The radiopharmaceuticals were commonly injected into the patient's blood stream for imaging the circulatory system or for imaging specific organs which absorb the injected radiopharmaceuticals. Gamma or scintillation camera heads were placed closely adjacent to a surface of the patient to monitor and record emitted radiation. In single photon-emission computed tomography, the head was rotated or indexed around the subject to monitor the emitted radiation from a plurality of directions. The monitored radiation data from the mulitplicity of directions was reconstructed into a three dimensional image representation of the radiopharmaceutical distribution within the patient. One of the problems with the SPECT imaging technique is that photon absorption and scatter by portions of the subject between the emitting radionuclide and the camera head distorted the resultant image. One solution for compensating for photon attenuation was to assume uniform photon attenuation throughout the subject. That is, the patient was assumed to be completely homogenous in terms of radiation attenuation with no distinction made for bone, soft tissue, lung, etc. This enabled attenuation estimates to be made based on the surface contour of the subject. Of course, human subjects do not cause uniform radiation attenuation, especially in the chest. In order to obtain more accurate radiation attenuation measurements, a direct measurement was made using transmission computed tomography techniques. That is, radiation was projected from a radiation source to the patient and radiation that was not attenuated was received by detectors at the opposite side. The source and detectors were rotated to collect data through a multiplicity of angles. This data was reconstructed into an image representation using conventional tomography algorithms. The radiation attenuation properties of the subject from the transmission computed tomography image were used to correct for radiation attenuation in a later SPECT or other emission study. One of the problems with this two step technique resided in registering the transmission computed tomography and the SPECT or other emission study images. Any misalignment of the two images provided erroneous radiation attenuation information which impaired the diagnostic value of the reconstructed images. Registration was improved by using discrete extrinsic or intrinsic landmarks that were known to bear a constant relationship to the patient's anatomy during the two studies. Another technique was to use a three dimensional surface identification algorithm to construct numerical models of the external surface of the images. The numerical models were then translated, rotated, and descaled until an optimal match was found. Nonetheless, there was still significant uncertainty when combining images from different modalities. Moreover, inconvenience, cost, and double scan time were inevitable when obtaining scans from two modalities. To overcome these disadvantages, simultaneous transmission and emission data acquisition was utilized. The gamma camera head was positioned on one surface of the subject and a large plane of a radiation source was disposed opposite the camera head, e.g. between the subject and a counterweight for the camera head. The patient was injected with a different radionuclide from the radionuclide in the large planar source. Using conventional dual radionuclide technology, the data from the injected or emitted radionuclide and the data from the larger planar source or transmitted radiation were separated. The transmitted data was reconstructed using parallel ray transmitted computed tomography algorithms to produce attenuation correction coefficients for use in the emitted radiation reconstruction. One problem with using a large planar source resided in its large bulk and weight. The large size of the planar source prevented the use of systems with multiple gamma cameras. Another drawback was the poor counting statistics of parallel-beam geometry reconstructions. Stronger radiation sources could be utilized to compensate for the poor counting statistics, but the associated higher patient radiation exposures are undesirable. It is an object of the present invention to provide a new and improved imaging method and system which overcomes the above-referenced problems and others. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an imaging system comprising: a plurality of gamma camera heads disposed for movement around and facing an examination region, each gamma camera head receiving radiation emitted from a subject in the examination region and producing output signals indicative thereof; and a transmission radiation source disposed opposite one of the heads across the examination region, characterised in that in said imaging system at least one of said plurality of gamma camera heads is not disposed opposite a radiation source. In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of imaging by reconstructing emission projection signals from a multi head gamma camera system to produce a pixelized image of a distribution of emission sources in an attenuating medium, the method comprising: projecting radiation through the medium to one but not all of the heads as the heads are rotated about the medium and collecting transmission projection data; during the rotation of the heads around the medium, receiving emission radiation from the emission sources distributed in the medium with the heads and collecting emission projection data; correcting the transmission and emission projection data for cross-talk therebetween; generating attenuation coefficients from the transmission data for the pixelized space; from the emission projection data set and the attenuation coefficient set, reconstructing an image space representation of the distribution of emission sources in the medium. Embodiments of systems and methods according to the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:- Figure 1 is a perspective view of a gamma camera system in accordance with the present invention; Figure 2 is a diagrammatic view of a gamma camera head and transmission source position controller; Figure 3 is a diagrammatic illustration of a line source, gamma camera head, and fan beam collimator; Figures 4A and 4B are diagrammatic illustrations of a non-truncated and a truncated transmission scan; Figure 5 illustrates the technique for processing the emission and transmission data in different energy ranges collected with the camera system of Figure 1; Figure 6 illustrates the technique for processing emission and transmission data in the same energy range collected with the camera system of Figure1; Figure 7 is a diagrammatic illustration of an alternate embodiment using a rectangular bar transmission radiation source and a fan beam collimator; Figure 8 is a diagrammatic illustration of a point transmission radiation source with a cone beam collimator; Figure 9 is a diagrammatic illustration of a disk radiation source with a cone beam collimator; Figure 10 is a diagrammatic illustration of a line radiation source with an astigmatic collimator. With reference to Figure 1, a SPECT camera assembly includes a patient couch or support means 10 for holding a subject such as a phantom 12 or a human patient in an examination region 14. With continuing reference to Figure 1 and further reference to Figure 2, a gantry 20 supports a plurality of gamma camera heads 22a, 22b, and 22c at regular intervals around the examination region 14, e.g. 120°. More specifically, a rotating means including a rotating drum or face plate 24 to which the camera heads are mounted and a drive motor 25 selectively rotate the camera heads around the examination region. Linear drive means, such as motors 28a, 28b, 28c that rotate screw driver 30a, 30b, 30c, that engage followers 32a, 32b, 32c, are mounted on the reverse side of the face plate for selectively moving each gamma camera head on roller carriages 34a along tracks or guides 36 radially toward and away from the subject. A control means is provided for rotating the camera heads around the subject and moving the camera heads toward and away from the subject during the rotation, as is conventional in the art. More specifically, an angular position detector 38 detects the number of degrees of rotation of the plate 24 from an arbitrary 0° origin. A look-up table 40 is loaded with one of a plurality of selectable orbits e.g. an oval orbit of a preselected size which most closely matches the patients size. The look-up table 40 is addressed by the monitored angle to retrieve the radial distance from the center of the examination region for each camera head at that angle. A comparing means 42 compares the desired radial distance from the look-up table with the actual, current radial distance of each head. The difference is conveyed to drivers 44a, 44b, 44c which cause corresponding linear motors 28a, 28b, 28c to move the heads the corresponding physical distance. A memory update means 46 add/subtracts the distance differences with the corresponding radial position of each head in a current position memory 48. This enables the camera heads to move around the subject in a circular path, an elliptical path, a peanut-shaped path, or other orbits by merely reloading the look-up table 40 from a large memory, such as a disc (not shown), of precalculated orbits. The symmetry in a circular path facilitates reconstruction of the collected data; whereas, the elliptical and peanut orbits move the gamma camera heads closer to the patient improving image quality. A radiation source 50, a line source in the FIGURE 1 embodiment, is mounted directly opposite a first of the gamma camera heads 22a and between the other two gamma camera heads 22b, 22c. The radiation source is selectively positionable radially either closer to or further from the first camera head 22a. Preferably, the radiation source is disposed behind a plane of the face of the camera heads 22b and 22c such that radiation therefrom cannot impinge directly on the other camera heads 22b, 22c. A collimating or shield means 51 is mounted to the radiation source to limit the projection of radiation to a fan beam that intercepts the first gamma camera head 22a. Optionally, one or more additional radiation sources 50' may also be provided. The transmission radiation source may be a tube or vessel filled with a radionuclide or an active radiation generator such as an x-ray tube. A motor 52 rotates a screw 54 that moves a follower 56 which is mounted to move the radiation source radially. Preferably the control circuit controls the motor 52 such that the radiation source 50 and the first camera head 22a stay a fixed distance apart. Direction invertor means 60 reverses the sign or direction of movement such that a driver 58 causes the motor 52 to move the radiation source the same distance, but in the opposite radial direction relative to the center of the examination region as the driver 44a causes the motor 28a to move the first head 22a. Alternately, the transmission radiation source 50 may be mounted to one of the adjoining heads 22b or 22c. Because movement of either head radially changes the effective angle of the fan, the reconstruction algorithm is adjusted with angular position to accommodate the changing effective fan angle. The effective fan angle is preferably precalculated and stored in the look-up table 40. As is conventional in the art, each camera head has a scintillation crystal that responds to incident radiation by producing a flash of light. An array of photomultiplier tubes produce electrical signals in response to each flash of light. The signals responsive to the same scintillation or flash of light are combined. The magnitude of the resultant sum is indicative of the energy of the incident radiation and the relative response of the closest photo-multiplier tubes is indicative of the spatial location of the scintillation. With reference to FIGURE 3, collimator 62 limits each incremental area of the scintillation crystal receiving radiation from along a fixed direction or ray, e.g. ray 64 of FIGURE 4A . The collimator has a plurality of vanes 66 which are directed toward a focal point, typically the transmission radiation source 50 . The vanes are sufficiently long that radiation impinging on the corresponding detector head is limited to radiation coming along a ray substantially from the focal point. In a preferred embodiment, the focal point and head size are selected such that a patient or subject under examination is completely encompassed within the transmission radiation fan as illustrated in FIGURE 4A . Conventional gamma camera heads can image radiation in two or more energy windows or ranges simultaneously. In a conventional dual energy gamma camera head, the sum signals are sorted based on amplitude. More specifically, energy windows or ranges are defined. Each window corresponds to a photopeak or energy spectrum of a radionuclide to be used in the examination. In the preferred embodiment, the injected or emission radionuclide has one preselected energy and the radiation source 50 or transmissive radiation has a second different energy. In this manner, the camera heads separate the transmission and emission radiation data by using the conventional energy separation circuitry used during dual injected radiopharmaceutical examinations. A position resolver resolves the position on the crystal, hence the ray angle, corresponding to scintillations or radiation events within one of the energy windows. With reference to FIGURE 5, the first head 22a has first energy level output means 70t for separating and outputting location or ray signals for each scintillation with an energy in the range of the transmission source 50 and a second energy level output means 70e for separating and outputting location or ray signals for each scintillation in the energy range of the emission radionuclide. Although the second head 22b and the third head 22c do not receive the transmission radiation directly, they do receive some of the transmission radiation by scattering and photons from other photopeak(s) of the emission source. Accordingly, the second head 22b has a transmitted energy output means 72t for separating and outputting transmission energy range data and the third head 22c has a transmitted energy output means 74t for transmission energy range data. A transmission radiation data correction means 76 corrects the transmission energy data from the output means 70t for emission radiation photopeak(s) in the transmission energy range. The transmission radiation correction means 76 includes a pair of dividers 80 and 82 which divide the output signals 72t and 74t in half, respectively. A summing means 84 sums these two half signals to provide a signal which is effectively the average of other emission photopeak photons received by heads 22b and 22c . A subtracting means 86 subtracts the average number of photons from the emission source detected in the transmission energy range by heads 22b and 22c from the transmission energy signals from head 22a . A corrected transmission projection data memory 88 stores the corrected transmission projection data. A transmission reconstruction means 90 reconstructs the transmission radiation data with a conventional CT or iterative reconstruction algorithm into a three dimensional electronic image representation stored in a three dimensional transmission radiation or attenuation image memory 92 , e.g. a fan beam reconstruction algorithm. Each pixel or voxel of the attenuation image memory 92 represents the radiation attenuation by a corresponding pixel or voxel of the examination region 14 or the subject being examined. Thus, when an emission radiation event occurs at a given pixel or voxel, one can determine the amount of radiation attenuation along the rays between the event voxel and the points on each head at which the scintillation occurs by summing the attenuation values of each pixel or voxel through which the ray passes. The attenuation probability of detection is the exponentiation of the negative of this sum. A further correction can be made by determining the distance through each intervening pixel or voxel the ray passes. When the ray extends through a pixel or voxel squarely from one face to the opposite face, the entire attenuation value is added. If the path goes through only a small corner, a correspondingly smaller portion of the attenuation value is added. A scaling means 94 adjusts the attenuation data in accordance with the relative energy of the transmission and emission sources, e.g. the ratio or a non-linear relationship of energy. A major goal in transmission CT is to compute local attenuation coefficients for the object of interest. The recorded projection data in a transmission scan is converted to an appropriate form by taking the natural logarithm of the ratio of unattenuated acquired count per pixel or voxel (flood image N 0 ) to observed count at a given pixel (recorded projection N). For those regions with observed count greater than the flood image, the line integral of the attenuation coefficients is set equal to zero, i.e.: N = N 0 x e -µx (1 a ). projection =∫µ dx =1 n ( N 0 N ) if N ≤ N 0 (1 b ) projection =0 if N > N 0 (1 c ). After performing this conversion, a conventional CT or iterative reconstruction algorithm is used to obtain the map of attenuation coefficients µ ij . The calculated attenuation map is used to correct for the photon attenuation in the emission study. By way of a specific example of the scaling means 94 in which scales the attenuation coefficients µ T1 / ij of a 75 kev T1-201 emission source relative to the attenuation coefficients µ TC / ij of a 140 kev TC-99m transmission source, the attenuation coefficients µ T1 ij for T1-201 emission is approximated by: µ T1 ij = µ 75 kev µ 140 kev x µ TC ij = 0.184/ cm 0.153/ cm x µ TC ij = 1.2µ TC ij Another scaling method is applied to the higher energy (140 kev) attenuation map. This method uses a look-up table of the linear attenuation coefficients for different materials at both 75 kev and 140 kev. A data interpolation technique is used to determine the scaling factor to transform the attenuation distribution at 140 kev to that at 75 kev. The second head similarly has an emission energy location or ray signal output means 72e and the third head 22c has an emission energy ray signal output 74e. Some of the transmission photons and scattered emission photons are detected within the emission radiation energy range. An emission radiation correction means 100 removes the component of the measured emission radiation which is attributable to the transmission radiation. The emission radiation correcting means 100 includes a first multiplying means 102a for multiplying the corrected first detector head transmission radiation signal from memory 88 by a scaling factor F 1 . A second multiplying means 102b multiplies the corrected transmission radiation signal corresponding to the first detector head from the corrected transmission data memory 88 by a second scaling factor F 2 and a third multiplying means 102c multiplies the corrected transmission signal from the memory 88 by a third scaling factor F 3 . The scaling factors F 1 , F 2 , F 3 are determined from initial calibration tests. The tests begin with collecting pure transmission data using a cold phantom, i.e. no emission source. The correction factors F 1 , F 2 , F 3 are determined for each head by calculating a ratio of the counts in the emission and transmission energy windows or ranges. Subtraction circuits 104a, 104b, 104c subtract the product of the transmission radiation value and the corresponding correction factor from the actual measured emission radiation projection data. Corrected emission ray or location signal memories 106a, 106b, and 106c store the corrected emission projection data from heads 22a, 22b, 22c, respectively. A combining circuit 108 combines the corrected emission data from heads 22a, 22b, and 22c. More specifically, the combining circuitry combines data from each head representing the same ray. That is, the collimator 62 defines the path, relative to the head, along which radiation travelled to cause scintillation at the monitored location on the head. The location on the head and the angle of the head when the event was monitored define the ray or path between the corresponding emission source and the point of receipt. The corrected emission projection data from the combining means 108 is stored in a total emission projection data memory 110 . An emission data reconstruction processor 112 reconstructs the emission data into a corresponding three dimensional image representation which is stored in an emission image memory 114. A video display terminal 116 or other display means provides a man-readable display of the reconstructed emission distribution. Typically, various displays will be selected, such as transverse or lateral slices through the patient, or even a three dimensional prospective representation. An attenuation correction means 118 corrects the emission data P km from total emission projection data memory 110 for attenuation by iterative reconstruction algorithms or means and provides corrected emission projection data to the emission data reconstruction means. Stated more mathematically, the emission projection data P km at projection angle  m and detector bin or ray k, and the image or back projection value X ij at pixel (i,j) are defined as: P km = Σ ij W km ij X ij (3 a ) X ij =Σ k,m W km ij P km (3 b ), where the weighting factor W km ij is given by W ij km = A km ij µ ij (1- e µ ij l km ij ) if µ ij >0 (3 c ). W km ij = l km ij A km ij , if µ ij =0 (3 d ), where 1 km ij is the length of the ray through the pixel. The attenuation factor A km ij is the exponential of the line integral of the attenuation coefficient µ ij from b ij , the entry point of projection ray to the pixel (i,j), to the detector. If no attenuation correction is needed, the attenuation coefficient µ ij is set to be zero. More specifically, the attenuation correction means 118 includes an attenuation factor calculating means 120 which calculates the attenuation factors A km ij . The attenuation factor calculating means calculates the exponential of the line integral of the scaled attenuation coefficients µ ij along each ray k at angle  m between pixel (i,j) and the detector head. Of course, zero values for rays that do not intersect the pixel need not be stored. A weighting factor calculating means 122 calculates the weighting factors W km ij in accordance with Equation (3c) for each emission data ray k and angle  m and each pixel (i,j) of the emission distribution image memory 114. The calculated weighting factors are stored in an attenuation weighting factor memory or look-up table 124 . The emission data reconstruction means 112 performs the multiplication and summing of Equation (3b) to generate the image values X ij at each iteration in accordance with the iterative scheme of Equation (4). As in most reconstruction schemes, the subject region is divided into small pixels. For each pixel, an emission radionuclide concentration and a projection radiation attenuation coefficient are determined. These parameters can be estimated by maximizing the likelihood (probability of observations). The preferred algorithm includes a technique for computing maximum likelihood estimates. This algorithm has the unique ability to model the Poisson nature of photon counting and the physical differences between transmission and emission tomography. For SPECT, photon attenuation and variation of resolution with depth can be treated appropriately and the use of an accurate statistical model can improve the quality of reconstruction with low counts. The combination of good statistical and physical models should produce superior reconstructions. The preferred algorithm which the emission data reconstruction means 112 performs the EM iterative reconstruction algorithm, i.e.: X n +1 ij = X n ij Σ k',m' W k'm' ij Σ k,m [ W km ij P km P n km ] With reference to FIGURE 6, the emission and transmission radiation may be sensed with the same energy range or window. Head 22a receives both the transmission and emission radiation; whereas, heads 22b and 22c receive the emission radiation. The heads 22a , 22b, and 22c have outputs 130a , 130b, and 130c, respectively, for outputting the common energy range radiation data. A transmission data correction means 132 corrects the data from output 130a in accordance with each emission data output from detector head outputs 130b and 130c. More specifically, the transmission data correcting means includes dividers 134 and 136 which divide the data from outputs 130b and 130c in half and an adding means 138 which combines the two halves to generate an average of the data received by the second and third heads. A subtraction means 140 subtracts the average data received by the second and third heads from the data received by the first head 22a to generate corrected transmission projection data which is stored in a corrected transmission data memory means 88'. A transmission data reconstruction means 90' reconstructs the corrected transmission data from the corrected data transmission memory means 88' to generate attenuation image data which is stored in an attenuation image memory means 92'. An emission data combining means 108' combines emission data from the second and third heads and stores the emission data in an emission data memory means 110'. An attenuation correction means 118' corrects the emission data in accordance with the attenuation data as described above in conjunction with the two energy embodiment. An emission data reconstruction means 112' reconstructs the corrected emission data to generate an emission source distribution image which is stored in an emission source distribution memory means 114'. With reference to FIGURE 4B, more accurate gamma camera images can be reconstructed when the collimators focus on the region of interest to be imaged within the subject. Better emission images can be generated by moving the focal point of the collimators closer to the center of the patient. When the transmission radiation source is moved closer to the patient, part of the patient, at some angles, falls outside of the transmission fan, i.e. there is a truncation of part of the subject. The truncated region of the body tends to cause a ring artifact of analogous diameter around the reconstructed image. One solution is to use different collimators on head 22a , that receives both emission and transmission radiation from heads 22b and 22c which receive only the emission radiation. That is, the emission only heads have collimators with a relatively short focal length, e.g. 50 cm., and the head 22a which receives both transmission and emission radiation has a longer focal length, e.g. 110 cm. In another solution, the oval cross-section of a human patient which is only moderately truncated provides sufficient data to calculate the attenuation coefficient factors for the EM iterative construction algorithm and analogous algorithms to solve the transmission reconstruction problem as a solution to a system of linear equations. Even though the transmission image is distorted, the attenuation factors A km ij (the exponentiation of the partial line integrals of the attenuation distribution µ ij ) are measured accurate enough for those attenuation factors that have the greatest influence from the emission measurements. With reference to FIGURE 7, in an alternate embodiment, the transmission radiation source is a rectangular bar source which projects a fan beam or which is restricted to generate a fan beam of transmitted radiation toward a fan beam collimator mounted on the opposite detector head. With reference to FIGURE 8, in another alternate embodiment, the radiation source is a point source which is restricted to direct a cone or pyramid of transmission radiation toward the oppositely disposed detector head. A cone beam collimator has tunnels which focus to a focal point at some distance from its surface. In the alternate embodiment of FIGURE 9, the radiation source is a small flat rectangular source or a disk source and the collimator a cone beam collimator. With reference to FIGURE 10, as yet another alternative, the transmission radiation source is a line source and an astigmatic collimator is used which places the focal point at two different focal lines. As yet another alternative, a flood source and a parallel collimator are used.

Claims: An imaging system comprising: a plurality of gamma camera heads (22a, b, c) disposed for movement around and facing an examination region (14), each gamma camera head (22a, b, c) receiving radiation emitted from a subject (12) in the examination region (14) and producing output signals indicative thereof; and a transmission radiation source (50) disposed opposite one of the heads (22a) across the examination region (14), characterised in that in said imaging system at least one (22b, c) of said plurality of gamma camera heads (22a, b, c) is not disposed opposite a radiation source (50, 50'). A system according to Claim 1 wherein the subject (12) is injected with a radionuclide of a first energy level and the radiation source (50) generates radiation of a second energy level and wherein each gamma camera head (22a, b, c) provides first and second energy level output signals and further including: second energy correction means (76) for correcting the second energy level signal corresponding to the radiation source (50), from the head (22a) opposite the radiation source (50) in accordance with other photopeak emission photons received by other camera (22b, c) heads, the second energy output signal from each of the camera heads being connected with the second energy correction means. A system according to Claim 1, wherein the subject (12) is injected with a radiopharmaceutical and further including means (132) for correcting output signals corresponding to the radiopharmaceutical from at least the gamma camera head (22b, c) not opposite the radiation source (50) to compensate for the radiation from the source (50). A system according to Claim 1 wherein the subject (12) is injected with a radionuclide and further including: means (118) for determining attenuation coefficients from the transmission radiation output signals from the head (22a) opposite the source (50); and means (112) for reconstructing an attenuation corrected image representation of radionuclide distribution from emission radiation signals from the heads. A system according to any preceding claim wherein the transmission radiation source (50) includes one of: a line source; a bar source; a point source; a flat rectangular-shaped source which is small compared to an entrance surface of the collimator; a disc source which is small compared to an entrance surface of the collimator; and, a flood source. A system according to any preceding claim further including a collimator (62) mounted on a radiation receiving face of each gamma camera head (22a,b,c), the collimator (62) mounted to the gamma camera head (22a) opposite the radiation source being one of: a fan beam collimator; a cone beam collimator; an astigmatic collimator; and, a parallel collimator. A system according to any preceding claim wherein the transmission radiation source (50) includes one of an x-ray tube and a radionuclide. A system according to any preceding claim further including source collimator means (15) for restricting radiation from the transmission source (50) to impinge on the one head (22a) across the examination region therefrom. A system according to any preceding claim further including: means (52,54,56,58) for moving the radiation source toward and away from the examination region (14). A system according to claim 9 further including: circumferential moving means (24,26) for moving the gamma camera heads circumferentially around the examination region; radial moving means (28,30,32) for moving the gamma camera heads radially toward and away from the examination region; and, control means for controlling at least one of the radiation source moving means (52,54,56,58) and the radial moving means (28,30,32) such that the radiation source (50) and the opposite head (22c) maintain a fixed spacing relative to each other. A system according to any preceding claim comprising reconstruction means (112) for processing concurrently received transmission radiation data from the one head (22a) and emission radiation data from the heads (22a, b, c) into an attenuation corrected image representation of emission radiation distribution in the examination region. A system according to Claim 11 wherein the reconstruction means (112) includes: attenuation data processing means (120) for calculating attenuation correction values from the transmission radiation data; emission data processing means for reconstructing the corrected image representation from the attenuation correction values and the emission data. A method of imaging by reconstructing emission projection signals from a multi head gamma camera system to produce a pixelized image of a distribution of emission sources in an attenuating medium (12) the method comprising: projecting radiation through the medium (12) to one but not all of the heads (22a, b, c) as the heads are rotated about the medium (12) and collecting transmission projection data; during the rotation of the heads (22a, b, c) around the medium (12), receiving emission radiation from the emission sources distributed in the medium (12) with the heads (22a, b, c) and collecting emission projection data; correcting the transmission and emission projection data for cross-talk therebetween; generating attenuation coefficients from the transmission data for the pixelized space; from the emission projection data set and the attenuation coefficient set, reconstructing an image space representation of the distribution of emission sources in the medium (12). A method according to Claim 13 wherein in the step of transmitting radiation through the examination region, the transmission radiation is either of x-rays from an x-ray tube or gamma radiation emanating from one of: a line source (50), a rectangular source (50), a point source (50), a disc source (50), and a flood source (50); and further including the step of collimating radiation passing from the medium to the heads with at least one of: a fan beam collimator (62) a cone beam collimator, an astigmatic collimator, and a parallel collimator. A method according to Claim 13 or 14 further including correcting the transmission projection data for scatter and photopeak photons from multi-peak emission radionuclei. A method according to Claim 13, 14 or 15 wherein the emission and transmission source (50) produce radiation having first and second energies, respectively, and wherein the step of correcting the transmission projection signals includes: measuring first and second energy radiation photons with each (22a,b,c,): substracting a portion of the transmission projection data from the transmission projection data of one of the heads (22a,b,c) to provide corrected transmission projection data; reconstructing a corrected transmission image representation from the corrected transmission projection data, the attenuation coefficients being generated from the corrected transmission image representation. A method as set forth in Claim 13,14 or 15 wherein the transmission and emission sources (50) produce radiation of the same energy and wherein the step of correcting the transmission projection data for cross-talk includes: monitoring the emission projection data from the two heads (22b,c,) which are not opposite the transmission radiation source (50); subtracting the monitored emission projection data from the simultaneously measured transmission and emission projection data of the head (22c) directly across from the transmission radiation source (50). A method according to any of Claims 13 to 17 wherein the step of generating the attenuation coefficients for the pixelized space includes: correcting the emission projection data for scatter from the transmission source (50). A method according to Claim 18 when dependent on Claim 16 wherein the correcting step includes: measuring a portion of transmission and emission photons scattering into an emission energy range with the heads (22a, b, c); subtracting the measured portion from the measured emission projection data of the heads (22a, b, c) to generate corrected emission projection data which are reconstructed into the emission source distribution representation. A method according to Claim 18 when dependent on Claim 17 wherein the correction step includes: measuring a portion of the transmission and emission photons in an emission energy range and detected by the two heads (22b,c) not directly opposite the transmission radiation source (50); subtracting the portion from the measured transmission projection data of the heads (22b, c) not directly opposite the radiation source (50) to generate corrected transmission data for reconstruction into the attenuation coefficients. A method according to claim 13 wherein: said step of projecting radiation through the medium (12) and collecting transmission projection data comprises detecting only transmission radiation photons which have passed through a central portion of the medium such that transmission radiation photons passing through edge portions of the medium are not detected; and said step of receiving emission radiation from the emission sources distributed in the medium (12) and collecting emission projection data comprises detecting emission radiation photons emitted by emission sources distributed within the central and edge portions of the medium.

Inventors: CHRISTIAN PAUL E, GULLBERG GRANT T, MORGAN HUGH T, TUNG CHI-HUA, ZENG GENGSHENG LAWRENCE, CHRISTIAN, PAUL E., GULLBERG, GRANT T., MORGAN, HUGH T., TUNG, CHI-HUA, ZENG, GENGSHENG LAWRENCE
Applicants: MARCONI MEDICAL SYS INC, UNIV UTAH, MARCONI MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
Application year: 1992
Main classification: A61B6
IPC codes: A61B5, G06T1, G01T1, G06T11, A61B6