Charge multiplying detector (CMD) suitable for small pixel CCD image sensors

Abstract: A method for multiplying charge in a CCD cell comprising the steps of temporarily holding charge in a potential well in the CCD cell, creating an electric field region in a portion of the CCD cell separated from the potential well, the electric field being of sufficient strength to cause impact ionization by carriers traversing the field, and causing the charge in the potential well to flow into the electric field region, the flow resulting in multiplication of the charge by impact ionization.

Description: FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention generally relates to charge multiplication devices. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Without limiting the scope of the invention, its background is described in connection with a small pixel CCD image sensor, as an example. Heretofore, in this field, increasing demand from the consumer market to supply higher and higher resolution CCD cameras has required designers to increase the number of pixels in the CCD image sensors that are used in these products. At the same time the competitive pressures to maintain or reduce the cost of these sensors necessitate the reduction of chip size and consequently the reduction of the active pixel area. This inevitable trend is clearly observed in the recent technical literature and also in the many product catalogs. This, however, leads to the two major problems: reduction in the image sensor sensitivity and reduction in the signal-to-noise ratio. The sensitivity of the image sensors is proportional to the pixel area, the aperture efficiency, the quantum efficiency, the integration time, and the charge to voltage conversion factor. The maximum sensor sensitivity of present day image sensors is usually determined by the noise floor of the charge detection amplifiers which convert the collected charge into an output voltage. Without this limit it would be possible to detect the individual photons and thus achieve a photon counting operation, the ultimate performance of an image sensor which is determined by the fundamental laws of physics. To reduce the noise floor of the charge detection amplifiers, however, is not an easy task. To achieve better performance, the sensor designers are developing various schemes of charge-to-voltage conversion using complicated kTC noise suppression circuits ("A New Noise Suppression Method for High-Definition CCD Camera", IEEE Trans. on Consumer Electronics , vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 368-374, August 1989), current modulation techniques ("A 250k-Pixel SIT Image Sensor Operating in its High-Sensitivity Mode", IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices , vol. ED-38, pp.1021-1027, May 1991), or employing many other novel charge detection structures ("New Low-Noise Output Amplifier for High-Definition CCD Image Sensor", IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices , vol. ED-38, pp.1048-1051, May 1991). There is, however, a well known technique, which has been used for many years in image orthicon camera vacuum tubes. It is a carrier multiplication process. There are many solid state devices available on the market today that utilize some form of carrier multiplication. These devices are typically referred to as "Avalanche Photo Diodes" (APD) and are used in optical communications. A large amount of literature has been accumulated on this subject and a good review can be found elsewhere ("Lightwave Communication Technology", Semiconductors and Semimetals, vol. 22, New York:Academic Press, 1985). Recently, an article describing the carrier multiplication in a sensing pixel that can be used in an area image sensor has also appeared ("A novel High-Gain Image Sensor Cell Based on Si p-n APD in Charge Storage Mode Operation", IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices , vol. ED-37, pp.1861-1868, August 1990). The carrier multiplication as is used in the solid state APD sensors and in common vacuum tube photomultipliers is effective in increasing the sensitivity and the signal to noise ratio, since the noise associated with this process is very low. This allows the sensor to increase the number of carriers well above the amplifier noise floor and thus provide the photon counting mode of operation. The signal-to-noise ratio of the output signal is then almost equal to the signal-to-noise ratio of the input photon flux rather than being limited by the noise of the charge detection amplifiers. However, devices based on the APD concept are too large to incorporate into a pixel of an image array and the gains may be limited. Some of the problems faced by designers have been the inability to incorporate the charge multiplication function into a solid state image sensor array in a way that would allow for higher carrier multiplication factors comparable to vacuum tube photodetectors (which do not record an image), and also devising a method to achieve higher multiplication factors than are possible with devices employing carrier multiplication in the photosite. Accordingly, improvements which overcome any or all of the problems are presently desirable. US-A-3 761 744 relates to shift register devices of the type that transfer charge along a semiconductor wafer through the appropriate formation of successive potential wells in the wafer. Transferred charge is regenerated by designing the parameters of the device such that, if charge is to be transferred from one storage region to the next, the potential well for causing the transfer is of sufficient value to cause avalanche breakdown; whereas if no charge is to be transferred, the potential well is insufficient to cause avalanche breakdown. Selective breakdown in this manner regenerates the charge being transferred through the production of additional current carriers. US-A-3 934 161 relates to a system for controlling the total charge collected on a charge-coupled imager to, in effect, provide an electronic shuttering action for the charge-coupled imager. The charge-coupled imager works in standard fashion and is normally biased into depletion whereby minority carriers, generated by the light impinging on the imager, are collected in predetermined charge collecting areas or wells, the charges in each well then being read out in a serial fashion. In order to prevent collection of an excess number of charges, the majority carriers are collected and integrated so that when a predetermined amount of charge is measured, a shuttering action takes place. Two modes of operation are disclosed. The first node is suitable for imaging applications and the second mode is suitable for laser warning receivers. It is herein recognized that a need exists for a CCD image sensor with a charge multiplication ability. The present invention is directed towards meeting those needs. The present invention provides a device including a charge multiplying device (CMD) implemented in a charge coupled device (CCD) comprising: a CCD cell; a first potential well in said CCD cell for temporarily holding charge; an electric field region in a portion of said CCD cell separated from said first potential well; a charge transfer barrier between said first potential well and said electric field region to prevent said charge from flowing from said first potential well region until said electric field region is of sufficient strength to cause impact ionization; means for causing said charge in said first potential well to flow into said electric field region when said electric field region is of sufficient strength to cause impact ionization, said flow resulting in multiplication of said charge by impact ionization; and a second potential well for holding the multiplied charge created by the impact ionization. An advantage of the invention is that it makes possible image sensors with higher sensitivity, improved signal-to-noise ratio, and variable gain. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The foregoing and further aspects of the invention are illustrated in the accompanying drawings wherein like elements are denoted by like reference designators and in which: FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a prior art four phase CCD cell; FIG. 2 is a timing diagram for the four phase CCD cell of Figure 1; FIG. 3 is a is a cross-sectional view of a first preferred embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 4 is a timing diagram for charge multiplication operation of the first preferred embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional two-dimensional potential profile diagram of a the area below the charge multiplication gate of the first preferred embodiment of the present invention: FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of a second preferred embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 7 is a timing diagram for charge multiplication operation of the second preferred embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of the experimental circuit used to demonstrate charge multiplication in the device of the second preferred embodiment; FIG. 9 is an oscilloscope trace of the video output of the circuit of Figure 8 when exposed to a uniformly illuminated horizontal bar pattern with charge multiplication not activated; FIG. 10 is an oscilloscope trace of the video output of the circuit of Figure 8 when exposed to a uniformly illuminated horizontal bar pattern with charge multiplication activated; FIG. 11 is a plot of charge multiplication factor, M, versus CMD gate bias for the circuit of Figure 8; FIG. 12 is a plot of excess noise factor, F, versus charge multiplication factor, M, for the circuit of Figure 8; FIG. 13a-d are schematic diagrams of sample device layouts incorporating the CMD function; FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram of a CMD/CCD image system having automatic electronic iris control. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention provides for an image sensor in which the carrier multiplication is produced in a typical CCD image sensor during the charge transferring process, rather than in a sensing pixel. This novel approach thus opens up the possibility of building solid state image sensors whose performance is equal to or exceeds the action of the image orthicon. The incorporation of the charge multiplication into the CCD device enhances one of its key advantages. The advantage of the CCD over the MOS or CID sensors is that the charge collected in a photosite can be efficiently transferred to a remotely located (usually on-chip) charge sensing amplifier. The amplifier can then be optimized for maximum performance since it has virtually no layout restrictions. The transfer to the charge detection amplifier is accomplished at a high speed from many pixel locations and at virtualy no loss. By utilizing the concept of the present invention, it is now also possible to add a low noise charge multiplying structure into the charge transferring path. This will increase the number of carriers reaching the charge sensing detector, which will make it much easier to detect low level signals, particularly at higher frequencies. The CCD image sensors utilizing this concept will, therefore, have an advantage in higher sensitivity, lower noise, and a variable gain that can be externally controlled by changing the field strength in the charge multiplication regions. Figure 1 illustrates a simple 4 phase CCD structure, indicated generally at 10, which is constructed by methods well known in the art. Figure 2 is a timing diagram showing the pulses applied to the respective four gate electrodes 12, 14, 16 and 18 of Figure 1 in order to achieve standard four phase charge transfer (without charge multiplication) through the device. The potential diagrams in Figure 1 illustrate the potential profile in the CCD channel at various times shown on the timing diagram of Figure 2. It will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that charge is transferred along the channel by sequentially creating a potential well at the leading edge of the direction of charge travel and then removing a potential well at the trailing edge. The charge packet 20 thus travels along the CCD channel from left to right. The time period from t 1 to t 1 ' represents one clock cycle, as the charge packet 20 has been moved through four phase regions. Illustrated in Figure 3 is a first preferred embodiment of the present invention, illustrated generally at 50, which incorporates the charge multiplication function into the prior art CCD cell of Figure 1. Figure 4 illustrates a timing diagram showing the pulses applied to the respective four gate electrodes 52, 54, 56 and 58 in order to achieve charge transfer and multiplication through the device. The DC biased transfer barrier is formed under the phase 3 electrode 56 with the temporary storage well under the phase 2 electrode 54. The phase 1 serves as a pixel separator and the high field region is formed at the interface between the phase 3 electrode 56 and phase 4 electrode 58. As the bias of the phase 2 electrode 54 lowers (i.e. as the potential well raises), stored charge is injected over the transfer barrier under the phase 3 electrode 56 and into the high field region between the phase 3 electrode 56 and the phase 4 electrode 58 (the formation of the high field region is described hereinbelow). When a carrier travels in a CCD channel, it travels, on average, a "mean free path", before interacting with an atom in the lattice and losing its energy. However, if the electric field in the channel is large enough, the carrier can gain sufficient energy from the field, while traveling within its mean free path, such that it frees additional electrons from the valence band upon impacting the lattice. The initial carrier, as well as the hole and electron created by the collision are then free to leave the region of the collision. This process is called impact ionization. During this process the electron-hole pairs are separated by the field perpendicular to the surface of the CCD and only the electrons are collected in the well under the phase 4 electrode 58. The holes flow either to the bulk or to the silicon-silicon dioxide interface depending on the type of the CCD structure and the location of their creation. The generated holes usually do not further participate in the multiplication process. The multiplication, therefore, involves only a single carrier which is known to be an inherently low noise process. After all the carriers have transferred through the high field region and multiplied, it is now possible to proceed with their transfer to the next stage. This is accomplished by biasing the phase 1 electrode 52 high and the phase 4 electrode 58 low, followed by biasing the phase 2 electrode 54 high and the phase 1 electrode 52 back low to its original level. The carriers now reside in the temporary storage well of the next stage and are ready for the next multiplication. This is initiated by biasing the phase 4 electrode 58 high and injecting the charge again over the potential barrier under the phase 3 electrode 56. From the Fig. 3 it can be also observed that it is possible to transfer the carriers back to the temporary storage well under the phase 2 electrode 54. This is accomplished by lowering the bias of the phase 4 electrode 58 and increasing the bias of the phase 2 electrode 54. In this case the high field region will occur between the phase 2 electrode 54 and the phase 3 electrode 56 (because of the large potential difference between the two regions) and the multiplied carriers will be collected in the well from which they have originally started (e.g. phase 2). This alternate method of carrier multiplication by bidirectional transfer may be advantageous in cases where there is not enough space available for long structures with many stages and where the number of transfers needs to be externally varied. To achieve the charge multiplication in a CCD channel it is necessary to transfer the carriers through the regions which have large lateral fields. These fields can be created by applying a potential difference between two adjacent gate electrodes or by supplying divergent doping profiles in two adjacent regions (by ion implantation, heteroepitaxial deposition, etc.). In a typical CCD device the large fields are present in the regions between the gate electrodes, but the carrier multiplication usually does not occur. The design of a modern CCD is optimized to achieve a smooth potential profile from one gate to another so that the fringing (lateral) fields can reach as far as possible under each gate. The reason for this design is to achieve a fast field-aided charge transfer with maximum charge transfer efficiency (CTE). As the bias to the gates is changed the charge almost immediately flows to reach the potential minimum and usually does not encounter any large fields since they have not yet developed. When the bias on the gates reaches its maximum level, all of the charge is usually already stored in the next well. Another reason for lack of carrier multiplication in a standard CCD channel is that a typical CCD is designed to operate near its full well capacity. The large amount of charge in the channel reduces the internal fields and this prevents formation of avalanche conditions. In order to achieve the charge multiplication, it is desirable that three requirements be satisfied. The first is that charge must be temporarily kept in a storage well behind a transfer barrier while the bias on the gates change and the large fringing fields have time to develop. This transfer delay is necessary since the bias on the gates cannot change very fast, usually due to the external clock driver limitations. After the fields reach their maximum strength, charge can be injected over the transfer barrier into the high field regions. The second condition is that the field must be sufficiently high so that the accelerated carriers reach a high enough energy to cause impact ionization in the material of the CCD channel. Finally, the amount of charge transferred in the CCD channel must be small relative to the CCD channel capacity in order to avoid the field self quenching effect. In some applications, however, this self-limiting function may be used to advantage by extending the dynamic range of the device through compression of the signal. There are two types of CCD devices which are frequently used today: the surface channel CCD and the buried channel CCD. The charge multiplication concept is applicable to both of these types, even though the preferred embodiments of the present invention are directed to the buried channel devices. The problem which will have to be overcome, however, is that the charge travels in a channel away from the surface and at some distance from the gate electrodes. Unfortunately, larger channel distance from the electrodes tends to smooth out the lateral potential profile. The highest lateral fields are present between the gate electrodes and diminish with the increasing depth into the bulk. As a consequence it will be more difficult to generate high avalanche fields in the buried channel devices. This is illustrated in Fig. 5 in a cross-sectional two-dimensional sketch of a potential profile diagram for the area of the CCD channel below the charge multiplying gate (e.g. the phase 4 electrode 58 of Figure 3), which shows the field potential at its highest level immediately adjacent the CMD gate. Figure 6 illustrates generally at 70 a prior art virtual phase buried channel CCD device (Texas Instruments TC211) whose operation has been modified to experimentally demonstrate a second preferred embodiment of the present invention. The standard operation of the CCD itself is described in detail in U.S. Patent 4,679,212, granted to the applicant of the present application. From Figure 6 it is apparent that the standard antiblooming gate present in the TC211 can be used as a CMD gate 74 if the device is properly clocked. The high field can be built in the interface between the virtual barrier existing under the region 76 and the CMD gate 74 before the charge is injected from the clocked well under the gate electrode 72. After the charge injection is completed, the CMD gate 74 bias can be lowered and the charge transferred to the virtual well found under the region 78 to be ready for the next cycle. The timing diagram is shown in Figure 7 and the block diagram of the experimental setup is shown generally at 80 in Figure 8. In order to clearly demonstrate the effect of the charge multiplication in a CCD structure, the TC211 device 84 of Figure 8 had a horizontal bar pattern (parallel to the horizontal shift register) projected onto the image sensing area. The LED light source 82 used for the illumination was pulsed only during the integration time, since the TC211 sensor 84 is a full frame device. The LED 82 illuminated the image sensing area with a good uniformity. The timing pulses of Figure 7 were supplied to the sensor 84 by drivers 86 and 88 under the control of a preprogrammed timing IC 90. The serial shift register output from sensor 84, controlled by  SR from driver 86, was fed through amplifier 92, sample and hold circuit 94 and another amplifier 96. This output was then displayed on an oscilloscope 98. The oscilloscope picture in Figure 9 shows the video output of this circuit when the charge multiplication function is not activated. It can be clearly seen that the output reflects the uniform illumination of the alternating light and dark regions of the horizontal bar pattern used as an image. In contrast, the oscilloscope picture in Figure 10 shows the resulting video output of the circuit of Figure 8 when the charge multiplication function is activated. From this picture it is apparent that charge from the stripes located near the serial shift register of the image sensor 84 (left side of the picture), which transfers only through a small number of CCD stages (and hence a small number of charge multiplication stages), does not show any significant multiplication and has a nominal level. On the other hand, charge from the top of the image area (right side of the picture), that has to transfer through approximately 165 stages, is significantly amplified. This photograph thus confirms the expected charge multiplication behavior of the modified operation of the device of Figure 6. The maximum multiplication obtained from the circuit of Figure 8 was roughly 5x. Taking into account that the device contained 165 lines, this translates into a gain per transfer of approximately M 0 =1.01, or a moderate 1% multiplication of the signal level per stage. Realizing that this performance level was achieved with a quick biasing modification to an existing commercial CCD image sensor, it is expected that even higher multiplication factors may be achieved when device design is optimized to the charge multiplication function. Even though charge multiplication has been demonstrated in a CCD channel as shown above, there is still a concern with demonstrating that this is a solution to the low sensitivity and high noise problems inherent in prior art small pixel CCD image sensors. The key parameter that must be investigated, in addition to the multiplication factor M, is the noise generated during the charge multiplication process itself. This noise is usually characterized by an excess noise factor F, which is defined as follows: F = (1/M 2 )<n 2 >/<n 0 2 >. The pointed brackets in equation (1) indicate ensemble averaging, <n 2 > and <n 0 2 > are the signal carrier variances before and after the multiplication, and M is the multiplication factor defined as: M = <n>/<n 0 >. The multiplication gain factor M was measured first on the device of Figure 8 with the results shown in Figure 11. The graph shows the dependency of the gain upon the CMD gate high level bias and has a shape as would be expected. A substantial gain increase is observed for the gate biases in the vicinity of 20 volts. The threshold at which a first noticeable gain, larger than unity, is observed is pproximately 14 volts. Gate biases larger than 22 volts resulted in the increase of column-to-column nonuniformities and a near saturation of the output. It is assumed that at this point the avalanche fields were beginning to be quenched by the large amount of charge traveling through the CCD channel, which may have somewhat reduced the multiplication. The result of the excess noise factor F measurement is shown in Figure 11. From this figure it is clear that the excess noise factor is approximately equal to F=1. It is also largely independent of the multiplication factor M. This is a very encouraging result which suggests that near photon counting performance is available from standard CCD image sensors. This can be shown as follows: (S/N) p = (n P ) 1/2 , (S/N) st = n p (n p + n a 2 ) -1/2 , (S/N) cmd = n p (n p F + (n a /M) 2 ) -1/2 , where n p is the number of photon generated carriers, (S/N) p is the signal-to-noise ratio of the photon generated carriers, (S/N) st the signal-to-noise ratio of a standard CCD image sensor, (S/N) cmd is the signal-to-noise ratio of a CCD image sensor with charge multiplication, and n a is the amplifier noise floor in number of equivalent electrons. By normalizing the signal-to-noise ratio of the CCD with the CMD device to the signal-to-noise ration on the input signal (S/N) p , it is possible to define the following figure of merit Q m : (Q m ) cmd = (F + (n a /M) 2 /n p ) -1/2 . From this equation, it is easily seen that even for moderate gains of, for example, M=20, using a conventional charged etection amplifier with a CDS (correlated double sampling, defined in U.S. Patent #4,656,503 issued to the applicant of the present application) circuit that can easily achieve a noise floor of n a =20 electrons, it is possible to reach (Q m ) cmd =0.707 at n p =1 electron. On the other hand, if the CMD is not used, (Qm) st will be: (Q m ) st = (1 + n a 2 /n p ) -1/2 For this case, (Q m ) st =0.707 will be reached only at n p =400 electrons. This is markedly lower performance that will cause the standard CCD image sensors to lose their competitiveness against sensors with CMD. A few of the advantages of the CMD concept are: the CMD can be easily implemented in any existing CCD structure ranging from the multiphase devices to the single phase virtual gate CCDs. Many stages can be cascaded to achieve high gains. The gain is externally controllable by adjusting the CMD gate clock amplitude. Finally, the high fields can be pulsed on only when needed during the charge injection and multiplication. The high fields can be turned off when there is no need for charge to be multiplied in order to minimize the possible unwanted dark carrier generation. Another advantage is the extreme flexibility in device layout that is possible while still maintaining the basic advantage of the novel charge multiplication concept. A few examples are shown in Figure 13. Figure 13(a) shows a straightforward approach with the CMD function incorporated into each stage, or a group of stages, of a CCD channel. The charge multiplication factor, M, may be independently controlled for each stage or group of stages, or all control lines may be tied to a single driver. Figure 13(b) illustrates a novel structure which allows for the repeated multiplication of charge in applications where space is severely limited. The signal is serially input into a conventional CCD channel 100. It is then shifted in parallel into the CMD channel 102 where it is serially shifted to the right and multiplied with each shift, after which it is shifted in parallel to the output CCD channel 104 and on to amplifier 106. This particular embodiment has the advantage that once in the CMD channel 102, the signal may be repeatedly shifted from left to right, right to left, etc. until the desired charge multiplication is achieved. This level of charge multiplication may be fixed or continuously variable depending on external conditions. Figure 13(c) shows an example of a CCD structure laid out in "racetrack fashion". The signal is serially input into a standard CCD channel 110, shifted in parallel into the CMD channel 112, where it is serially shifted around the loop as many times as necessary to achieve the desired charge multiplication, after which it is shifted in parallel to the output CCD register 114 and on to amplifier 116. This layout also allows for many multiplication stages in a very small space. Finally, Figure 13(d) shows several parallel CCD channels 118 which contain CMD cells 199 under the control of a single control line. All of the CCD channels 118 empty into serial shift register 121, which shifts the charge to the output. This layout, as well as many similar and analogous ones, allow for the same amount of gain to be introduced into each of several parallel CCD channels, and is very useful in image sensor arrays. The charge multiplication concept of the present invention may be readily incorporated into any CCD design presently known in the art. For example, the CCD designs which can benefit from charge multiplication include: multiphase CCDs with or without implanted well regions, CCDs based on two dimensional electron gas structures, virtual phase CCDs,buried channel devices, surface channel devices, etc. It will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art that the variable gain nature of the CMD device lends itself particularly well for automatic gain control (AGC) systems incorporating feedback. This can allow the CCD in the image sensing system to have a gain factor that is dependent upon the conditions under which the system is operating. A block diagram of a typical system is illustrated in Figure 14, where a lens 120 focuses an image onto a CMD/CCD image sensor array 122, which multiplies the charge level of the signal and provides a serial output to the video signal processor 124, whose output is fed to a monitor and/or video recorder. The output of the video signal processor is sampled by peak/average signal detector 126 based on external program input and a weight control from timing generator 128. Peak/average signal detector 126 provides a CMD gain control output to CMD/CCD driver circuitry 130 which is proportional to the scene illumination level seen by the system lens. This control signal is used by the CMD/CCD driver circuitry 130 to adjust the control signals sent to the CMD/CCD image sensor 122, thereby controlling the field strength and hence the gain of the device. In this way, the system can eliminate the need for an iris control on the lens 120, resulting in a lower cost lens and a more reliable electronic control of irising rather than mechanical, as well as providing a device with extended dynamic range. Such automatic gain control will find application in both still video cameras and motion video camera. A few preferred embodiments have been described in detail hereinabove. It is to be understood that the scope of the invention also comprehends embodiments different from those described, yet within the scope of the claims. For example, special gate structures may be employed for the charge multiplication regions which maximize charge multiplication and device signal-to-noise ratio, special high-field implanted regions may be used under the CMD gate, built-in fixed field regions may be employed, and also the CMD concept may be used with virtual phase devices, two dimensional electron gas structures, etc. Words of inclusion are to be interpreted as nonexhaustive in considering the scope of the invention. Internal and external connections can be ohmic, capacitive, direct or indirect, via intervening circuits or otherwise. Implementation is contemplated in discrete components or fully integrated circuits in silicon, gallium arsenide, or other electronic materials families, as well as in optical-based or other technology-based forms and embodiments. While this invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. It is therefore intended that the appended claim encompasses any such modifications or embodiments.

Claims: A device including a charge multiplying device (CMD) implemented in a charge coupled device (CCD) comprising: a CCD cell; a first potential well in said CCD cell for temporarily holding charge; an electric field region in a portion of said CCD cell separated from said first potential well; a charge transfer barrier between said first potential well and said electric field region to prevent said charge from flowing from said first potential well region until said electric field region is of sufficient strength to cause impact ionization; means for causing said charge in said first potential well to flow into said electric field region when said electric field region is of sufficient strength to cause impact ionization, said flow resulting in multiplication of said charge by impact ionization; and a second potential well for holding the multiplied charge created by the impact ionization.

Inventors: HYNECEK JAROSLAV, HYNECEK, JAROSLAV
Applicants: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
Application year: 1992
Main classification: H01L27
IPC codes: H01L27, H01L29