Magnetoresistance effect element

Abstract: A magnetoresistance effect element comprises the multilayer formed by alternately stacking magnetic and nonmagnetic layers (2, 3). The magnetic layers (3) containing at least two magnetic elements selected from a group of magnetic elements consisting of Fe, Co and Ni. Any two magnetic layers adjacent to each other with one of the nonmagnetic layer interposed therebetween are antiferromagnetically coupled under a condition where a magnetic field is not substantially applied thereto.

Description: This invention relates to a magnetoresistance effect element formed by using multilayer of ultra-thin layers or a so-called artificial lattice film. The magnetoresistance effect is an effect of varied resistance of an object caused by the variation in the intensity of the magnetic field applied to it. Magnetoresistance effect elements that utilize this effect find a variety of applications including those for magnetic field sensors and magnetic heads because of the high sensitivity to magnetic fields and the ability to produce a relatively large output of such elements. While Permalloy thin film is wide used for magnetoresistance effect elements, the magnetoresistance ratio of a Permalloy foil (ΔR/Rs: where ΔR is the electric resistance change between zero magnetic filed and saturated magnetic field; Rs is saturation resistivity) is as low as 2 or 3% and, therefore, does show a satisfactory sensitivity to changes in the magnetic field required for a magnetoresistance effect element. Meanwhile, as new magnetoresistance effect element, multilayer formed by alternately stacking magnetic and nonmagnetic layers having a thickness of several to tens of Angstroms or so-called artificial lattice films have been attracting attention. Known types of artificial lattice film include (Fe/Cr) n ( Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 61(21) (1988)2472 ), (Per malloy/Cu/Co/Cu) n ( J. Phys. SOC. Jap. vol. 59 (9) (1990) 3061 ) and (Co/Cu) n ( J. Mag. Mag. Mat. 94, (1991) L1 ; Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 2152 ). While an artificial lattice film can present a dramatically enhanced magnetoresistance effect when compared with a Permalloy thin film, artificial lattice films having a remarkable magnetoresistance effect can be currently produced only by a film forming apparatus capable of carrying out a supervacuum processing, which uses a supervacuum technique such as the ultra-high vacuum evaporation (UHV) method or the molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) method. Artificial lattice films prepared in an ordinary film forming apparatus do not unfortunately show a satisfactory magnetoresistance effect. In view of these circumstances, it is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a magnetoresistance effect element which has large magnetoresistance ratio and which can be applied to a practical use even when the element is produced in an ordinary thin film forming apparatus. Use of magnetic layers formed of at least two different magnetic materials, in particular, Fe, Ni or Co or an alloy of these is disclosed in EP-A-O 406 060 . Moreover, JP-A-2 023 681 discloses a structure in which a multilayer structure includes non-magnetic layers but which does not utilise antiferromagnetic coupling. However, the present invention is as defined by claim 1. This invention can be more fully understood from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which: Fig. 1 is a schematic sectional view of a magnetoresistance effect element according to an embodiment of the present invention. Fig. 2 is a graph illustrating the relationship between the thickness of a nonmagnetic layer of magnetic multilayer and magnetoresistance ratio of the element. Fig. 3 is a graph illustrating the relationship between the thickness of a nonmagnetic layer of magnetic multilayer and saturated field of the element. Fig. 4 is a graph showing the magnetoresistance ratio of Example 1. Fig. 5 is a graph showing the magnetoresistance curve of Example 2. Fig. 6 is a graph showing the magnetoresistance curve of Example 3. Fig. 7 is a graph showing the magnetoresistance curve of Example 4. Fig. 8 is a graph showing the magnetoresistance curve of Example 5. Fig. 9 is a graph showing the magnetoresistance curve of Example 6. Fig. 10 is a graph showing the magnetoresistance curve of Comparison Example 1. Fig. 11 is a graph showing the magnetoresistance curve of Comparison Example 2. Fig. 12 is a graph showing torque curve of Example 12. Fig. 13 is a graph showing the magnetoresistance curve of Example 12. As a result of intensive research efforts of the inventors of the present invention to develop artificial lattice films that show a large magnetoresistive effect, they came to find that the magnetoresistance effect of a (Co/Cu) n type artificial lattice film is remarkably enhanced when the Co is partly substituted by Fe. They also found that the effect can be obtained when the magnetic layers contain at least two of Fe, Co and Ni and the effect is particularly large when any two neighboring magnetic layers are antiferromagnetically coupled under a condition where a magnetic field is not substantially applied thereto. The present invention is achieved based on the findings of the present inventors. The present invention will now be explained in detail. A magnetoresistance effect element according to the present invention comprises a multilayer prepared by alternately stacking magnetic and nonmagnetic layers and typically has a configuration as shown in Fig. 1, where a total of n identical combinations of a nonmagnetic layer 2 and a magnetic layer 3 are vertically stacked on a substrate 1. Here, the lowest layer may be a nonmagnetic one or a magnetic one. A buffer layer made of a soft magnetic material may be interposed between the substrate 1 and the multilayer. The magnetic layers contain an Fe-Co alloy in order to obtain a large magnetoresistance change. The alloy may also contain Ni. The magnetic layers preferably have in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy. It is preferable that any neighbouring ones of the magnetic layers are antiferromagnetically coupled under a condition where a magnetic field is not substantially applied thereto. Here, "antiferromagnetically coupled" means that the layers are coupled in such a manner that the magnetic moments of any two neighbouring magnetic layers are inversely directed. Such an arrangement of coupling can increase the magnetoresistance ratio. On the other hand, the force with which neighboring layers are antiferromagnetically coupled is preferably as small as possible because the smaller the antiferromagnetically coupling force is, the smaller the saturation field (H S ) is, and therefore the more advantageous for applications including those for magnetic heads. It is advantageous that the saturated magnetic field H S of an element according to the invention is small in view of increasing the magnetoresistance ratio (ΔR/R) by using small magnetic field. Materials that can be used for nonmagnetic layers for the purpose of the present invention include Cu, Au, Ag and Ru, which may be used as a single material or in the form of an alloy containing any of them. When a nonmagnetic layer made of Cu-Au alloy, the antiferromagnetic coupling force between two neighboring layers can be reduced. While magnetic metal layers and nonmagnetic layers may be combined in many different ways, the following combinations are recommendable from the viewpoint of obtaining large magnetoresistance effect. The magnetic layers are made of an alloy represented by formula Fe 1-x Co x (where 0.5 ≦ x < 1, preferably 0.5 ≦ x ≦ 0.999) and the nonmagnetic layers are made of Cu. In order to obtain a sufficiently large magnetoresistance ratio (ΔR/R), the thickness t M (as expressed in terms of Angstrom or A) of a magnetic layer preferably falls within the range represented by 2A ≦ t M ≦ 100A, while the thickness t N (as expressed in terms of Angstrom or A) of a nonmagnetic layer preferably falls within the range represented by 2A ≦ t N ≦ 100A. More preferably, they fall within the range represented by 7A ≦ t M ≦ 90A and 9A ≦ t N ≦ 50A respectively. The relationship between the thickness of a nonmagnetic layer and the magnetoresistance ratio can be graphically expressed in a manner as shown in Fig. 2. Since the magnetoresistance ratio oscillatory changes as a function of the thickness t N of the nonmagnetic layer, the thickness t N is preferably found within the range represented above so as to show a large magnetoresistance ratio. On the other hand, as is shown in Fig. 3, the saturated magnetic field also cyclically changes as a function of the thickness of the non-magnetic layer with the peaks substantially agreeing with those of the magnetoresistance ratio. Therefore, it may be understood that the thickness of the nonmagnetic layer should be so determined that the magnetoresistance ratio and the saturated magnetic field has a relationship optimal to the specific application of the element. Figs. 2 and 3 illustrate the result of an experiment conducted at room temperature, using multilayer comprising sixteen magnetic layers made of Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 and having a thickness of 10A and a same number of nonmagnetic layers made of copper and having different thicknesses which are found within the above range. The number of combined layers is preferably between 5 and several tens. While a larger number may be advantageous from the viewpoint of magnetoresistance ratio, the effect reaches a saturated level and will not be improved any further if the number is large. Therefore, it is preferable that the number of combined layers is defined within a range where the magnetoresistance effect does not get to a saturated level. The material to be used for the substrate for a multilayer according to the present invention does not need to be specifically defined. Materials that can be used for the substrate include SiO, MgO spinel, and Si. The multilayer described above can be prepared by means of ordinary thin film forming techniques involving an initial vacuum level of 1.33 x 10 -5 Nm -2 (10 -7 Torr) or less (or a pressure equal to 1.33 x 10 -5 Nm -3 (10 -7 Torr) or more) such as the RF magnetron sputtering method, the ion beam sputtering (IBS) method and the vacuum evaporation method as well as techniques involving a supervacuum condition such as the molecular beam epitaxy method and the supervacuum sputtering method. A magnetoresistance effect element utilizing a conventional artificial lattice film that comprises magnetic layers made of a single element such as (Co/Cu) n and (Fe/Cr) n shows a magnetoresistance ratio between 20 and 50% if it is prepared by a film forming apparatus utilizing a supervacuum method such as UHV. However, the magnetoresistance ratio of the element falls to an unsatisfactory level of several percent if it is prepared by an apparatus involving an ordinary initial vacuum level. To the contrary, a magnetoresistance effect element according to the present invention can be prepared by an ordinary film forming apparatus to show a sufficient magnetoresistance ratio for practical use. It should be noted that neither the magnetic nor the nonmagnetic layers of the multilayer of a device according to the invention need to have an identical chemical composition and an identical thickness. Now, the present invention will be described by way of examples. [Example 1] In this example, magnetic layers were made of a Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy and nonmagnetic layers were made of Cu. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. A quartz substrate was placed in a chamber and the inside of the chamber was evacuated to 6.65 x 10 -5 Nm -2 (5x10 -7 ) Torr. Then, Ar gas was introduced into the chamber to raise the pressure to 1.33 x 10 -2 Nm -2 (1x10 -4 ) Torr and a sputtering operation was carried out, using an accelerating voltage of 500v and a beam current of 30 mA. Three different types of targets made of iron Fe, Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy Cu were used. Firstly, an Fe target was sputtered to form a buffer layer having a thickness of 50A on the quartz substrate. Subsequently, a Cu target and a Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy target were alternately sputtered fifteen times to stack fifteen unit layers each comprising a nonmagnetic Cu layer having a thickness of 9A and a magnetic Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy layer having a thickness of 7A, (the number of the unit layer is 15), thereby forming the multilayer as shown in Fig. 1. The multilayer is referred to (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 7A/Cu9A) 15 . While a buffer layer was formed in the above embodiment, the buffer layer is not necessarily required for the purpose of the present invention. Then, the magnetoresistance effect of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four points method, which is commonly used in the field of the present invention. Fig. 4 illustrates the result of the measurement. In Fig. 4, the transverse and vertical axes respectively indicates the intensity of magnetic field and the normarized electric resistance (R/R (H=0)), when the resistance of the element is 1 under the condition of the magnetic field intensity of 0, so that the relationship between the magnetoresistance effect and the electric resistance of the element is illustrated there. The magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R was determined from the graph to show the magnetoresistance effect of the element. It was 7.5%, or a satisfactorily large value. It was confirmed that the multilayer which used a Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy for the magnetic layers and Cu for the nonmagnetic layers was suitable for a magnetoresistance effect element. [Example 2] In this example, magnetic layers were made of a Fe 0.25 Co 0.75 alloy the nonmagnetic layers were made of Cu. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. Firstly, an Fe buffer layer having a thickness of 50A was formed on a quartz substrate. Subsequently, Cu and Fe 0.25 Co 0.75 alloy targets were alternately sputtered fifteen times to stack fifteen unit layers each comprising nonmagnetic Cu layers having a thickness of 9A and magnetic Fe 0.25 Co 0.75 alloy layers having a thickness of 7A (the number of the unit layer is 15), thereby forming multilayer, as shown in Fig. 1. A condition of film formation was identical with that of Example 1. The multilayer is referred to (Fe 0.25 Co 0.75 7A/Cu9A) 15 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four points method. Fig. 5, which appears similar to Fig. 4, illustrates the result of the measurement. The magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R was determined from the graph to show the magnetoresistance effect of the element. It was 11.1%, or a satisfactorily large value. It was confirmed that the multilayer which used a Fe 0.25 Co 0.75 alloy for the magnetic layers and Cu for the nonmagnetic layers was suitable for a magnetoresistance effect element. [Example 3] In this example, magnetic layers were made of a Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy and nonmagnetic layers were made of Cu. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. Silicon coated with an oxide film having a thickness of approximately 1,000A was used as a substrate. Cu and Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy targets were alternately sputtered fifteen times to stack fifteen unit layers each comprising a nonmagnetic Cu layer having a thickness of 9A and a magnetic Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy layer having a thickness of 15A (the number of the unit layer is 15), thereby forming the multilayer, as shown in Fig. 1. A condition of film formation was identical with that of Example 1. The multilayer is referred to (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 15A/Cu9A) 15 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four point method. Fig. 6, which appears similar to Fig. 4, illustrates the result of the measurement. The magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R was determined from the graph to show the magnetoresistance effect of the element. It was 8.15%, or a satisfactorily large value. It was confirmed that the multilayer which used a Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy for the magnetic layers and Cu for the nonmagnetic layers was suitable for a magnetoresistance effect element. [Comparative Example 3] In this example, magnetic layers were made of a Fe 0.75 Co 0.25 alloy nonmagnetic layers were made of Cr. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. MgO (100) single crystal was used as a substrate. Cr and Fe 0.75 Co 0.25 alloy targets were alternately sputtered fifteen times to stack fifteen unit layers each comprising a nonmagnetic Cr layer having a thickness of 13A and a magnetic Fe 0.75 Co 0.25 alloy layer having a thickness of 20A (the number of the unit layer is 15), thereby forming the multilayer, as shown in Fig. 1. A condition of film formation was identical with that of Example 1. The multilayer is referred to (Fe 0.75 Co 0.25 20A/ Cr13A) 15 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four point method. Fig. 7, which appears similar to Fig. 4, illustrates the result of the measurement. The magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R was determined from the graph to show-the magnetoresistance effect of the element. It was 6.8%, or a satisfactorily large value. It was confirmed that the multilayer of this example was suitable for a magnetoresistance effect element. [Example 4] In this example, magnetic layers were made of a Ni 0.4 (Fe 0.5 Co 0.5 ) 0.6 alloy and nonmagnetic layers were made of Cu. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. Silicon coated with a oxide film having a thickness of approximately 1,000A was used as a substrate. Cu and Ni 0.4 (Fe 0.5 Co 0.5 ) 0.6 alloy targets were alternately sputtered fifteen time to stack fifteen unit layers each comprising a nonmagnetic Cu layer having a thickness of 9A and a magnetic Ni 0.4 (Fe 0.5 Co 0.5 ) 0.6 alloy layer having a thickness of 15A (the number of the unit layer is 15), thereby forming the multilayer, as shown in Fig. 1. A condition of film formation was identical with that of Example 1. The multilayer is referred to (Ni 0.4 (Fe 0.5 Co 0.5 ) 0.6 15A/Cu9A) 15 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four points method. Fig. 8, which appears similar to Fig. 4, illustrates the result of the measurement. The magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R was determined from the graph to show the magnetoresistance effect of the element. It was 7.8%, or a satisfactorily large value. It was confirmed that the multilayer of this example was suitable for a magnetoresistance effect element. [Comparative Example 4] In this example, magnetic layers were made of a Ni 0,25 (Fe 0.75 Co 0.25 ) 0.75 alloy and nonmagnetic layers were made of Cr. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. MgO (100) single crystal was used as a substrate. Cr and Ni 0.25 (Fe 0.75 Co 0.25 ) 0.75 alloy targets were alternately sputtered fifteen times to stack fifteen unit layers each comprising a nonmagnetic Cr layer having a thickness of 13A and a magnetic Ni 0,25 (Fe 0.75 Co 0.25 ) 0.75 alloy layer having a thickness of 20A (the number of the unit layer is 15), thereby forming the multilayer, as shown in Fig. 1. A condition of film formation was identical with that of Example 1. The multilayer is referred to (Ni 0.25 (Fe 0.75 Co 0.25 ) 0.75 20A/Cr13A) 15 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four points method. Fig. 9, which appears similar to Fig. 4, illustrates the result of the measurement. The magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R was determined from the graph to show the magnetoresistance effect of the element. It was 5.7%, or a satisfactorily large value. It was confirmed that this multilayer was suitable for a magnetoresistive effect element. [Comparative Example 1] In this comparison example, magnetic layers were made of Co and nonmagnetic layers made of Cu. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. Quartz was used as substrate. Firstly, an Fe buffer layer having a thickness of 50A was formed on the quartz substrate. Subsequently, Cu and Co targets were alternately sputtered fifteen times to stack fifteen unit layers each comprising a nonmagnetic Cu layer having a thickness of 9A and a Co layer having a thickness of 7A (the number of the unit layer is 15), thereby forming multilayer, as shown in Fig. 1. A condition of film formation was identical with that of Example 1. The multilayer is referred to (Co7A/Cu9A) 15 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four points method. Fig. 10, which appears similar to Fig. 4, illustrates the result of the measurement. The magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R was determined from the graph to show the magnetoresistance effect of the element. It was 4.4%, or a considerably low value as compared to those of the above examples. [Comparative Example 2] In this comparison example, magnetic layers were made of Fe and nonmagnetic layers made of Cr. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. A MgO (100) single crystal was used as a substrate. Cr and Fe targets were alternately sputtered fifteen times to stack fifteen unit layers each comprising a nonmagnetic Cr layer having a thickness of 13A and an Fe layer having a thickness of 20A (the number of the unit layer is 15), thereby forming the multilayer, as shown in Fig. 1. A condition of film formation was identical with that of Example 1. The multilayer is referred to (Fe20A/Cr13A) 15 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four points method. Fig. 11, which appears similar to Fig. 4, illustrates the result of the measurement. The magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R was determined from the graph to show the magnetoresistance effect of the element. It was 2.4%, or a considerably low value as compared to those of the above examples. [Example 5] In this example, the magnetic layers were made of a Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy nonmagnetic layers were made of Cu. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. The condition under which the multilayer was prepared was different from that of Example 1. The inventors of the present invention found that the magnetoresistance ratio of the multilayer is very sensitive to the accelerating voltage at the time of film formation. Therefor, the operation of film formation was conducted for this example with the accelerating voltage raised to 600V and the beam current maintained to 30mA. The attained vacuum level and the Ar partial pressure were same as those of Example 1. Firstly, a magnetic Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 layer was formed on a substrate of MgO (110) single crystal to the thickness of 10A and a nonmagnetic Cu layer was formed thereon to the thickness of 10A to produce an unit layer. Then, other fifteen unit layers, which were identical with the first one, were sequentially formed on the first unit layer to produce the multilayer having a total of sixteen unit layers. The multilayer is referred to (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 10A/CU10A) 16 . For the purpose of comparison, similar multilayer comprising sixteen unit layers, each consisting of a magnetic layer and a nonmagnetic layer, was prepared in the same way except that the magnetic layers were made of Co. This multilayer is referred to (Co10A/Cu10A) 16 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of each of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four points method to determine the magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R of the multilayer. It was 39.4% for (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 10A/Cu10A) 16 and 31.5% for (Co10A/Cu10A) 16 . Thus, it was confirmed that (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 10A/Cu10A) 16 comprising magnetic layers made of an alloy had a higher magnetoresistance ratio. [Example 6] In this example, the magnetic layers were made of a Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy nonmagnetic layers were made of a CuAu alloy. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. In the preparation of the multilayer under a condition which as identical with that of Example 5, firstly an Fe buffer layer was formed on a quartz substrate to a thickness of 50A. Then, a nonmagnetic CuAu layer was formed thereon to a thickness of 10A and a magnetic Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 layer was formed further on the nonmagnetic CuAu layer to a thickness of 20A to produce an unit layer. Fifteen more unit layers were sequentially formed on the first unit layer to produce the multilayer having a total of sixteen unit layers. The multilayer is referred to (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 20A/CuAu10A) 16 . For comparison, similar multilayer comprising sixteen unit layers, each consisting of a magnetic layer and a nonmagnetic layer, was prepared in the same way except that the magnetic layers were made of Co. This multilayer is referred to (Co20A/CuAu10A) 16 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of each of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four points method to determine the magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R of the multilayer. It was 20.2% for (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 20A/CuAu10A) 16 and 17.8% for (Co20A/CuAu10A) 16 . Thus, it was confirmed that (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 20A/CuAu10A) 16 comprising magnetic layers made of an alloy had a higher magnetoresistance ration. [Example 7] In this example, the magnetic layers were made of a Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 alloy and nonmagnetic layers were made of Au. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. In the preparation of the multilayer under a condition which as identical with that of Example 5, firstly an Fe buffer layer was formed on a quartz substrate to a thickness of 50A. Then, a nonmagnetic Au layer was formed thereon to a thickness of 10A and a magnetic Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 layer was formed on the nonmagnetic Au layer to a thickness of 20A to produce a unit layer. Fifteen more unit layers were sequentially formed on the first unit layer to produce the multilayer having a total of sixteen unit layers. The multilayer is referred to (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 20A/Au10A) 16 . For comparison, similar multilayer comprising sixteen unit layers, each consisting of a magnetic layer and a nonmagnetic layer, were prepared in the same way except that the magnetic layers were made of Co. This multilayer is referred to (Co20A/Au10A) 16 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of each of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four points method to determine the magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R of the multilayer. It was 15.3% for (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 20A/Au10A) 16 and 10.8% for (Co20A/Au10A) 16 . Thus, it was confirmed that (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 20A/CuAu10A) 16 comprising magnetic layers made of an alloy had a higher magnetoresistance ration. [Comparative Example 5] In this example, the magnetic layers were made of a Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 alloy and nonmagnetic layers were made of Cu. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. In the preparation of multilayer under a condition which as identical with that of Example 5, firstly an Fe buffer layer was formed on a quartz substrate to the thickness of 50A. Then, a nonmagnetic Cu layer was formed thereon to a thickness of 10A and a magnetic Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 layer was formed on the nonmagnetic Cu layer also to the thickness of 10A to produce an unit layer. Fifteen more unit layers were sequentially formed on the first unit layer to produce the multilayer having a total of sixteen unit layers. The multilayer is referred to (Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 10A/Cu10A) 16 . For comparison, similar multilayer comprising sixteen unit layers, each consisting of a magnetic layer and a nonmagnetic layer, were prepared in the same way except that the magnetic layers were made of Ni. This multilayer is referred to (Ni10A/Cu10A) 16 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of each of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the convention four points method to determine the magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R of the multilayer. It was 18.3% for (Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 10A/Cu10A) 16 and 10.1% for (Ni10A/Cu10A) 16 . Thus, it was confirmed that (Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 10A/Cu10A) 16 comprising magnetic layers made of an alloy had a higher magnetoresistance ratio. [Comparative Example 6] In this example, magnetic layers were made of a Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 alloy and nonmagnetic layers were made of Au. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. In the preparation of the multilayer under a condition which as identical with that of Example 5, firstly an Fe buffer layer was formed on a quartz substrate to a thickness of 50A. Then, a nonmagnetic Au layer was formed thereon to a thickness of 10A and a magnetic Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 layer was formed on the nonmagnetic Au layer to a thickness of 20A to produce a unit layer. Fifteen more unit layers were sequentially formed on the first unit layer to produce the multilayer having a total of sixteen unit layers. The laminate is referred to(Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 20A/Au10A) 16 . For comparison, similar multilayer comprising sixteen unit layers, each consisting of a magnetic layer and a nonmagnetic layer, was prepared in the same way except that the magnetic layers were made of Ni. This multilayer is referred to (Ni20A/Au10A) 16 . Then, the magnetoresistance effect of each of the prepared multilayer was measured by means of the conventional four points method to determine the magnetoresistance ratio ΔR/R of the multilayer. It was 13.4% for (Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 20A/Au10A) 16 /Au10A) 16 and 8.2% for (Ni20A/Au10A) 16 . Thus, it was confirmed that (Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 20A/Au10A) 16 comprising magnetic layers made of an alloy had a higher magnetoresistance ratio. [Comparative Example 7] In this example, magnetic layers were made of Permalloy of Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 and nonmagnetic layers were made of Cu. The ion beam sputtering method was used to prepare multilayer. A MgO (110) single crystal substrate was placed in a chamber and the inside of the chamber was evacuated to 6.65 x 10 -5 Nm -2 (5x10 -7 Torr). Then, Ar gas was introduced into the chamber to raise the pressure to 1 x 10 -4 Torr and a sputtering operation was carried out, using an accelerating voltage of 700V and a beam current of 30 mA. Two different types of targets made of a Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 alloy and Cu were used. Firstly, a magnetic Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 layer was formed on the MgO (11O) substrate and then a nonmagnetic copper (Cu) layer was formed thereon to produce a unit layer. Thereafter, fifteen more unit layers were sequentially formed on the first unit layer to produce the multilayer comprising a total of sixteen unit layers. Fig. 12 shows a torque curve of the multilayer. Since the torque curve is twofold symmetry as shown in Fig. 12, it was confirmed that the magnetic layers have in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy. Fig. 13 is a graph showing the magnetoresistance effect of the element along the direction of the axis of easy magnetization of the magnetic layers. It was confirmed that the saturated magnetic field H S of the element was as low as 1.2kOe, while its magnetoresistance ration was as high as 16.7%, as shown in Fig. 13. When the multilayer having the same structure of above-described multilayer was formed on a SiO2 substrate, it was found that no uniaxial magnetic anisotropy was obtained and its magnetoresistance ratio was 5 5.5%. As shown in Fig. 13, the resistance of the element began to change around 1.0kOe and rapidly saturated with a small change of approximately 20Oe in the magnetic field, making the graph rise and fall very sharply. It may be apparent that a highly sensitive magnetic field sensor can be realized by utilizing these sharply rising and falling areas.

Claims: A magnetoresistance effect element comprising a multilayer formed by two neighbouring magnetic layers and a non-magnetic layer (2), wherein the non-magnetic layer (2) is disposed between neighbouring magnetic layers (3) in a manner to produce a magnetoresistance effect caused by change of the relative magnetic spin direction between said neighbouring magnetic layers, characterised in that said non-magnetic layer (2) contains at least one element selected from the group of Cu, Au, Ru and Ag and each magnetic layer (3) contains an alloy of Fe 1-x Co x where 0.5 ≤ x < 1, and each of the magnetic layers does not contain (Ni A Co 1-A ) B Fe 1-B where 0.6 ≤ A ≤ 1.0, 0.7≤ B ≤ 1.0. A magnetoresistance effect element according to claim 1, characterised by further comprising a substrate (1) for supporting said multilayer. A magnetoresistance effect element according to claim 2, characterised by further comprising a buffer layer of a soft magnetic material and arranged between said substrate and said multilayer. A magnetoresistance effect element according to claim 2, characterised in that said substrate is made of SiO 2 , MgO, or Si. A magnetoresistance effect element according to claim 1, characterised in that said magnetic layers have a thickness of 0.2 to 10 nanometres (2 to 100 Angstrom). A magnetoresistance effect element according to claim 1, characterised in that said magnetic layers have a thickness of 0.7 to 9 nanometres (7 to 90 Angstrom). A magnetoresistance effect element according to claim 1, characterised in that said nonmagnetic layer has a thickness of 0.2 to 10 nanometres (2 to 100 Angstrom). A magnetoresistance effect element according to claim 1, characterised in that said nonmagnetic layer has a thickness of 0.9 to 5.0 nanometres (9 to 50 Angstrom). A magnetoresistance effect element according to claim 1, characterised in that said magnetic layers have in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy. A magnetoresistance effect element according to claim 1, characterised in that said magnetic layers further contains Ni. A magnetoresistance effect element according to claim 1, characterised in that said nonmagnetic layer contains Cu. A magnetoresistance effect element according to claim 11, characterised in that said nonmagnetic layer further contains Au or Ag.

Inventors: INOMATA KOICHIRO, OKUNO SHINO, SAITO YOSHIAKI, INOMATA, KOICHIRO, OKUNO, SHINO, SAITO, YOSHIAKI, INOMATA, KOICHIRO, C/O INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DIV., Okuno, Shino, c/o Intellectual Property Div., Saito, Yoshiaki, c/o Intellectual Property Div.
Applicants: TOSHIBA KK, KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA
Application year: 1992
Main classification: H01L43
IPC codes: H01L43, G01R33