Knitting process and fabric suitable for use as an upholstery fabric

Abstract: A weft knitted double-jersey fabric is knitted in a construction of repeating groups of courses in which some courses (a, b) have loops (12, 13) pulled to both fabric faces (8, 9) and some courses (c, d) have loops (18) pulled to one fabric face (9) and are transversed by yarn regions (21) which extend across at least two wales and up to seven or more wales. The yarn feed to the needle beds of the knitting machine is limited to no more than 4.0 cm/cm of bed length over which the fabric is knitted in courses in which loops are pulled to both faces of the fabric and to no more than 2.0 cm/cm of bed length, preferably no more than 1.8 cm/cm, in courses in which loops are pulled to one face of the fabric. The fabric has an extensibility of no more than 12% in wale and course directions. It is knitted with a high count yarn of 550 to 850 decitex which may be an air-textured polyester yarn. It is suitable for use as upholstery fabric particularly in the form of a vehicle seat upholstery cover which may be shaped to fit the seat in the knitting process.

Description: This invention relates to a process for weft knitting fabric suitable for use as an upholstery fabric, for example for covering seats of vehicles such as automobiles, aircraft and trains. The term "seats" is used generally to include seat backs. Hitherto, woven fabrics have been used for covering vehicle seats and some warp knitted fabrics have been used for the same purpose. Weft knitted fabric has potential advantages for use in vehicle upholstery in terms of the ability of weft knitting machines to shape the fabric so that the number of seams required in a seat cover can be reduced. However, the inherent stretchability of conventional weft knitted fabric has been a major factor in preventing its use in vehicle upholstery because it gives rise to unsightly distortion and to damage of the fabric in use. The present invention is based on the discovery that the choice of the right stitch structure together with a sufficient degree of tightness in that structure, that is a sufficiently small loop size, permit weft knitted fabrics to be produced which are sufficiently rigid and resistant to deformation as to make them suitable for upholstery use and some such fabrics can be made which are able to fulfil the stringent requirements for potential use in upholstery covers for automobile seats. The rigidity required for such upholstery fabric has been assessed as an extensibility in the course and wale directions of 12% or less in each case, when measured by the standard test procedure on a Fryma extensiometer. According to this invention, a process for weft knitting a double jersey fabric suitable for use as an upholstery fabric comprises feeding yarns to beds of needles on a weft knitting machine and knitting the yarns using said needles to form a weft knitted fabric and is characterised by knitting at least a substantial part of the fabric with a repeating structure of a group of at least three courses which includes a course or courses having loops pulled to both faces of the fabric, a course or courses having all, or substantially all, loops pulled to one face of the fabric, and yarn regions extending course-wise without loops, the wales transverse to said group of courses comprising repeating sets of wales in which a first set of two or more wales is adjacent to a second set of two or more wales, adjacent wales in the first set having loops on opposite faces of the fabric with the loops on one face being in number ratio to the loops on the other face of at least 3:1, preferably at least 4:1, and the second set of wales being traversed in at least one of the courses in which all, or substantially all, of the loops are pulled to one face of the fabric by a yarn region without loops which extends between loops across two or more wales, and limiting the yarn feed to the needle beds such that in at least some courses having loops pulled to both faces of the fabric, the length of yarn supplied per length of needle bed over which the fabric is knitted is no more than 4.0 cm/cm and in at least some courses in which all, or substantially all, of the loops are pulled to one face of the fabric, the length of yarn supplied per length of needle bed over which the fabric is knitted is no more than 2.0 cm/cm and preferably no more than 1.8 cm/cm. In the fabric structure knitted by the process of the invention, a group of courses preferably comprises at least four courses and these are preferably knitted to include at least two courses which have a yarn region without loops which extends between loops across two or more wales in said second set of wales. In a group of courses, the number of courses knitted having loops pulled to both faces of the fabric may be equal to the number of courses knitted having all, or substantially all, loops pulled to one face of the fabric. The group of courses has been referred to as repeating which means that each repeat has the structure referred to but does not necessarily imply identity between repeats. For example, in two successive groups of courses, a first set of wales in the first group of courses may be knitted in alignment with a second set of wales in the second group of courses and a second set of wales in the first group of courses may be knitted in alignment with a first set of wales in the second group of courses. A structure of this type is illustrated in Figure 2 of the drawings. The yarn region referred to as extending between loops over at least two wales in the second set of wales, is preferably incorporated to extend over at least three wales, more preferably over at least four wales, and may even extend over seven wales or more. It is also preferred that for all, or substantially all, of those courses in which all, or substantially all, of the loops are pulled to one face of the fabric and which incorporate the aforesaid yarn regions extending between loops across at least two wales, it is the same face of the fabric to which said loops are pulled. This emphasises the imbalance between the numbers of knitted loops on the respective faces of the fabric, which can improve rigidity. In addition, patterning of the face of the fabric which will be exposed in use is facilitated by this arrangement which can also give a fabric face having improved resistance to wear and tear because of a greater concentration of smaller knitted loops on that surface. As well as yarn regions as referred to in the previous paragraph, (that is located in at least one course in which all or substantially all of the loops are pulled to one face of the fabric) additional yarn regions may be incorporated to extend course-wise without loops across at least one wale in one or more other courses. These include courses of both types referred to, that is courses with loops pulled to both faces of the fabric and courses with all, or substantially all, loops pulled to one face of the fabric. Preferably all, or substantially all, of the additional yarn regions extend between loops which are pulled to the same face of the fabric as the loops in the courses which incorporate the yarn regions extending between loops across at least two wales. In the case of courses in which the loops are pulled to both faces of the fabric, there may be two or more such courses, in which case it is preferred that said additional yarn regions in one such course extend across wales which are different from the wales across which said additional yarn regions extend in another such course. An arrangement of this sort is shown in Figures 1(a) and 1(b) of the accompanying drawings. The off-setting as between wales of the relatively inextensible yarn regions which extend along different courses helps to counter-balance the inherent extensibility provided by sections of courses in which loops are pulled to both faces of the fabric and to promote rigidity throughout the fabric. The process of the invention preferably is carried out on a flat V-bed knitting machine of gauge in the range 10 to 14. Gauge is an expression of the number of needles per inch along the bed of the knitting machine so that 10 to 14 gauge machines have needle bed densities in the range 3.94 to 5.51 needles per cm. A preferred machine is a 12 gauge machine. Cylinder and dial circular machines may also be used. In addition to the knitting of the fabric in the structure described, the desired low extensibility is achieved by limiting the yarn supplied to form the courses of knitting. As specified, in at least some courses having loops pulled to both faces of the fabric, the length of yarn supplied per length of needle bed over which the fabric is knitted is no more than 4.0 cm/cm and in at least some courses having all, or substantially all, loops pulled to one face of the fabric, the length of yarn supplied per length of needle bed over which the fabric is knitted is no more than 2.0 cm/cm, preferably no more than 1.8 cm/cm. The yarn supplied to the needles may also be characterised in terms of the length of yarn supplied to a course per the number of active needles used in knitting that course. This is called the yarn length per active needles. It is also possible to characterise the length of yarn supplied to a course per the total number of needles which are at some time active in knitting the fabric. This is called the yarn length per total needles. Expressed in this way, it is preferred that the yarn length per total needles in a course is less than 0.40 cm in at least some courses having loops pulled to both faces of the fabric and is less than 0.20 cm in at least some courses in which all, or substantially all, loops are pulled to one face of the fabric. The invention includes a knitted fabric suitable for use as an upholstery fabric which has been made by the process of the invention. The fabric of the invention may have an extensibility in wale and course directions which is no more than 12%. In one or both wale and course directions the extensibility may be no more than 10% or no more than 8%. The yarn used for knitting the weft knitted fabric of the invention is preferably a textured continuous filament synthetic yarn. It preferably has a count in the unrelaxed state in the range 550 to 850 decitex, more preferably in the range 680 to 750 decitex. A particularly preferred yarn is an air-textured continuous filament polyester yarn. The invention includes an upholstery cover for a vehicle seat, particularly an automotive vehicle seat, which comprises weft knitted fabric according to the invention. Preferably such weft knitted fabric is shaped in the knitting to produce a cover which is thereby shaped at least in part to fit the vehicle seat. The invention will be further described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:- Figures 1(a) to 1(d) show diagrammatically four successive courses (a) to (d) in a fabric knitted according to the process of the invention, having a striped pattern and knitted on needles of opposed needle beds of a flat V-bed knitting machine, Figures 2(a) to 2(h) are representations similar to those of Figure 1 but showing eight successive courses of an alternating structure in a striped fabric according to the invention, and Figures 3(a) to 3(c) are representations similar to those of Figures 1 and 2 but showing three successive courses of a Milano rib fabric which, in the form described below, does not fulfil the requirements of the invention. Figure 1 of the drawings illustrates diagrammatically knitting of four successive courses in a striped fabric according to the invention. The points 10 represent needles of the two opposed needle beds of a flat V-bed knitting machine. In course 1(a), yarn 11 is supplied to needles of both needle beds of the knitting machine so that in this course loops 12 are pulled to one face 8 of the fabric produced and loops 13 are pulled to the other face 9 of the fabric. The pattern of loops in the course 1(a) is 1 x 2, that is single loops 12 pulled to the face 8 of the fabric are interspersed in each case with two loops 13 pulled to the face 9 of the fabric, thus forming yarn regions 14, which contain no knitted loops, and extend in the direction of the course 1(a) between adjacent loops 13 pulled to the face 9 of the fabric. The regular 1 x 2 loop configuration of this rib (i.e. double-jersey) course 1(a) ensures that the yarn regions 14 occur at regular wale locations along the course. Course 1(b) of the fabric of Figure 1 also has a 1 x 2 stitch configuration formed on the needles 10, loops 15 being pulled to face 8 and loops 16 to face 9 of the fabric. Adjacent loops 16 have yarn regions 17, without knitted loops, extending course-wise between them but the loop configuration in course 1(b) is such that the wale location of the yarn regions 17 is different from the location of the yarn regions 14. The wales in the fabric are indicated by letters A, B, C, etc. at the bottom of Figure 1 and the yarn regions 14 in course 1(a) occur in wales C, G and K whereas the yarn regions 17 in course 1(b) occur in wales A,E, I and M. Thus, the regions of the fabric represented, for example, by wale groups D, E and F or H, I and J which, according to the structure of course 1(a), would be expected to be relatively extensible in the course-wise direction are rendered more rigid (that is less extensible) because of the presence of the course-wise extending yarn regions 17 without knitted loops in the adjacent course 1(b). The yarn regions 14 of course 1(a) provide rigidity in the wale regions B, C, D and F, G, H, etc. Course 1(c) of the fabric, following course 1(b), comprises loops 18 pulled to face 9 of the fabric only. The loops 18 are arranged in groups of three separated by yarn regions 21 extending course-wise and containing no knitted loops. The yarn regions 21 extend between loops 18 drawn to the same face 9 of the fabric and have a length equal to four needle spaces of the needle bed on which the course 1(c) is knitted (equivalent to eight needle spaces taking both needle beds into account). The length of the yarn regions 21 can also be characterised as equal to seven wales which means that each region 21 extends across seven empty needles, taking account of needles of both beds or three empty needles taking account of needles of the bed on which the course 1(c) is knitted. Of course a fabric may be knitted on a half-gauge machine, that is using only half the needles of the machine so that references to empty needles in indicating the length of the regions 21 must be taken as references to "empty, active" needles, that is to needles empty in course 1(c) but used elsewhere in forming the fabric structure. For this reason it is better to characterise the length of such regions by reference to the wales over which the regions extend. The other course-wise regions of yarn 22 in the course 1(c) each extend between loops 18 over one wale. Course 1(d) which follows course 1(c) has exactly the same configuration as course 1(c) and is followed by a course sequence exactly like courses 1(a) to 1(c) and so on. That is, the fabric pattern is a four course repeat and by choosing appropriate colours of yarn for the four courses, a striped pattern is produced. In the fabric shown in Figure 1, wales A to G comprise a first set of wales as defined according to the process of the invention and wales H to L comprise a second set of wales as defined according to the process of the invention. Wales M, N, O also constitute a first set of wales as aforesaid. Looking at the sets of wales A to G and M, N, O, it can be seen that as between adjacent wales in those sets, the ratio of loops pulled to opposite faces of the fabric is 4:1. In the second set of wales H to L, there are two courses (c) and (d) having yarn regions (21) without loops which extend across two or more wales as specified, in fact across seven wales in this case. In the following description relating to the fabrics shown in the various figures of the drawings, the properties of the fabrics are given in respect of fabrics knitted in the constructions shown and described using a 715 decitex air-textured yarn of continuous polyester filaments. The fabrics were all knitted on a Dubied Jet 2F flat V-bed knitting machine equipped with 12 gauge latch needles. In the example of Figure 1, the fabric was knitted on both needle beds of the knitting machine which had a total of 600 needles. In courses 1(a) and 1(b), 450 of the needles were active (i.e. yarn was taken into the needle hooks) in knitting those courses and the length of yarn supplied to the courses was 229.5 cm and 230.9 cm respectively. In courses 1(c) and 1(d), 150 of the needles were active in knitting those courses and the length of yarn supplied to the courses was 98.0 cm and 97.6 cm respectively. The width of the fabric produced on a total of 600 active needles was measured at 54.5 cm after the fabric had been removed from the knitting machine and given a steam relaxation. For the above fabric, figures for the length of yarn per active needles and the length of yarn per total needles for each course are shown in the following Table 1:- Course Length of Yarn Supplied (cm) Length of Yarn (cm) per Active Needles Length of Yarn (cm) per Total Needles 1(a) 229.5 0.51 0.38 1(b) 230.9 0.51 0.38 1(c) 98 0.65 0.16 1(d) 97.6 0.65 0.16 The fabric of Figure 2 has a structure similar to that of Figure 1 but in this case an eight course repeat (a) - (h) is used and the wale location of the knitted loops in the single bed courses (c), (d) and (g), (h), is different in each four course section of the repeat. Thus, the yarn regions 30 of the courses 2(c) and 2(d) in which yarn not containing knitted loops extend course-wise between loops of the respective course are situated in different wale locations from similar yarn regions 31 of the courses 2(g) and 2(h). Each of the yarn regions 30 and 31 extends over five wales, that is over five needles which at other stages in the formation of the fabric take yarn and form loops to contribute to the production of a knitted wale in the fabric. If the structure shown in Figure 2 is repeated, then the relatively inextensible yarn regions 30 and 31 alternate between a second set of wales and a first set of wales at four course intervals. This alternating between wales further improves the rigidity of the fabric. If appropriate colours of yarn are chosen for the eight courses, a checked pattern is produced. Figure 3 illustrates the three course repeat of a "Milano Rib" fabric (which is outside the scope of the invention) in which successive courses 3(a) and 3(b) each have loops pulled to a single face of the fabric but to a different face respectively. Course 3(c) is a 1 x 1 rib structure. A piece of fabric with a width of 49.2 cm after steaming was produced on 600 needles in this structure. In courses 3(a) and 3(b), 300 of the needles were active in knitting and the length of the yarn supplied to the courses was 124.3 cm and 120.9 cm respectively. In course 3(c) 600 of the needles were active and the length of yarn supplied to the course was 289.6 cm. For the above fabric, figures for the length of yarn per active needles and the length of yarn per total needles for each course are shown in the following Table 2:- Course Length of Yarn Supplied (cm) Length of Yarn (cm) per Active Needles Length of Yarn (cm) per Total Needles 3(a) 124.3 0.41 0.21 3(b) 120.9 0.40 0.20 3(c) 289.6 0.48 0.48 The fabrics of Figures 1 and 3 were tested for extensibility and recovery after stretching by the following test method:- The extensibility test was carried out on a Fryma dual extensiometer on fabric specimens cut to a size of 90 mm by 75 mm, the longer dimension corresponding to the direction of measurement of the stretch (wale or course). The tests were carried out in accordance with the conditions prescribed in british Standard Specification BS 4294:1968 with the jaw separation of the extensiometer set at 75 mm. One end of the specimen under test was clamped in the fixed jaw, a "Perspex" (Trade Mark) plate was placed on top of the specimen to ensure it was flat and the other end of the specimen was then clamped in the movable jaw. The "Perspex" (Trade Mark) plate was removed and the specimen was then loaded and measured as specified in BS 4294:1968. The measurements were carried out at 20°C and 65.0% Relative Humidity. Extensibility is expressed as percentage extensibility, that is the percentage of the original length of the fabric sample before stretching by which the fabric is extended in the test. The ability of the fabric to recover after being stretched was assessed by measuring the amount by which the fabric sample remained extended beyond its original length in the direction in which it had been stretched after the load had been removed. This was assessed 1 minute and 30 minutes after removal of the stretching load and expressed as a percentage extension based on the original length of the sample. The results of the extensibility and recovery from stretch tests on the fabrics of Figures 1 and 3 are shown in the following Table 3:- Fabric Direction Extensibility % % Extension after 1 minute 30 minutes Figure 1 wale 7.8 0 0 course 9.6 0 0 Figure 3 wale 12.0 0 0 course 25.3 1.3 1.3 The Milano Rib fabric of Figure 3 is not made by a process according to the invention and its high extensibility of 25.3% in the course direction does not meet the desired standard for vehicle seat upholstery fabric of 12% or less extensibility. In contrast, the fabric of Figure 1 has an extensibility in both wale and course directions of less than 10% A fabric having the structure of Figure 1 was knitted over the same number of needles with a shorter average length of yarn supplied to courses 1(a) and 1(b) of 222.5 cm and to courses 1(c) and 1(d) of 96.8 cm. For this fabric, figures for the length of yarn per active needles and the length of yarn per total needles for each course are shown in the following Table 4:- Course Length of Yarn Supplied (cm) Length of Yarn (cm) per Active Needles Length of Yarn (cm) per Total Needles 1(a) 219.8 0.49 0.37 1(b) 226.1 0.50 0.38 1(c) 99.4 0.66 0.17 1(d) 94.2 0.63 0.17 The fabric of Figure 1 modified as specified in Table 4 above was tested for stretch and stretch recovery according to the test described earlier and the results are shown in Table 5 as follows:- Fabric Direction Stretch % % Extension after 1 minute 30 minutes Figure 1 wale 7.8 0 0 course 7.8 0 0 Thus it can be seen that if the fabric of Figure 1 is knitted sufficiently tightly, it can be made sufficiently rigid to have a stretch of less than 8% in both wale and course directions. The fabrics described above were produced on a flat V-bed knitting machine having a gauge of 12, that is 12 needles to the inch (2.54 cm). This gauge is sometimes designated E12. As mentioned, the yarn used was a 715 decitex air-textured yarn of continuous polyester filaments. In general, the fabrics according to the invention were knitted very tightly with as short a stitch length as possible in a commercial knitting operation, taking into account the nature of the yarn and its count and the gauge of the machine. If a finer gauge machine is used to knit fabric according to the invention, a shorter stitch length and thus a shorter length of yarn per active needles would be appropriate to achieve fabric according to the invention. Thus, the figures in relation to the length of yarn supplied in each course given in relation to the fabrics of Figures 1 and 2 are representative of fabrics according to the invention knitted on a 12 gauge machine. In knitting fabrics according to the invention on machines of other gauges, the length of yarn supplied to each course is adjusted according to the machine gauge to give the equivalent tight stitch structure and therefore the required stretch in the fabric of 12% or less. As a guide to the tightness of knitting in fabrics according to the invention knitted on machines of different gauges, the general rule is that the yarn supplied per length of needle bed should remain approximately the same for a given structure knitted on different gauges if equivalent stretch properties are to be achieved and thus the length of yarn supplied per total needles will decrease as the gauge becomes finer. The fabrics described above are knitted on a twin bed, 12 gauge V-flat knitting machine having 300 needles on each bed and a bed length over which knitting takes place of 63.5 cm. Expressed in relationship to bed length, the length of yarn supplied to the courses of the fabric of Figure 1 are shown in the following Table 6:- Courses Length of Yarn Supplied (cm) Length of Yarn Supplied per Bed Length (cm/cm) 1(a) 229.5 3.61 1(b) 230.9 3.63 1(c) 98.0 1.54 1(d) 97.6 1.54 For the fabric made according to the structure of Figure 1 but with the reduced lengths of yarn supplied to each course as set out in Table 4, the corresponding figures expressed in relationship to bed length are shown in Table 7:- Courses Length of Yarn Supplied (cm) Length of Yarn Supplied per Bed Length (cm/cm) 1(a) 219.8 3.46 1(b) 226.1 3.56 1(c) 99.4 1.57 1(d) 94.2 1.48 For the fabric outside the invention shown in Figure 3, the corresponding figures expressed in relationship to bed length are shown in Table 8:- Course s Length of Yarn Supplied (cm) Length of Yarn Supplied per Bed Length (cm/cm) 3(a) 124.3 1.96 3(b) 120.9 1.90 3(c) 289.6 4.56

Claims: A process for weft knitting a double jersey fabric suitable for use as an upholstery fabric comprising feeding yarns (11) to beds of needles (10) on a weft knitting machine and knitting the yarns using said needles to form a weft knitted fabric characterised by knitting at least a substantial part of the fabric with a repeating structure of a group of at least three courses (a-d) which includes a course or courses (a,b) having loops (12,13,15,16) pulled to both faces (8,9) of the fabric, a course or courses (c,d) having all, or substantially all, loops (18) pulled to one face (9) of the fabric, and yarn regions (21,30,31) extending course-wise without loops (18), the wales (A-O) transverse to said group of courses (a-d) comprising repeating sets of wales (A-O) in which a first set (A-G) of two or more wales is adjacent to a second set (H-L) of two or more wales, adjacent wales in the first set having loops (12,13,15,16,18) on opposite faces (8,9) of the fabric with the loops (13,16,18) on one face (9) being in number ratio to the loops (12,15) on the other face (8) of at least 3:1 and the second set of wales (H-L) being traversed in at least one of the courses (c,d) in which all, or substantially all, of the loops (18) are pulled to one face (9) of the fabric by a yarn region (21) without loops (18) which extends between loops (18) across two or more wales and limiting the yarn feed to the needle beds such that in at least some courses (a,b) having loops (12,13,15,16) pulled to both faces of the fabric, the length of yarn (11) supplied per length of needle bed over which the fabric is knitted is no more than 4.0 cm/cm and in at least some courses (c,d) in which all, or substantially all, of the loops (18) are pulled to one face (9) of the fabric, the length of yarn supplied per length of needle bed over which the fabric is knitted is no more than 2.0 cm/cm. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which in courses (c,d) in which all, or substantially all, of the loops (18) are pulled to one face (9) of the fabric, the length of yarn supplied per length of needlebed is no more than 1.8 cm/cm. A process as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 characterised in that a group of courses (a,b,c,d) comprises at least four courses. A process as claimed in claim 2 characterised in that in a group of courses (a,b,c,d) at least two courses (c,d) are knitted having a yarn region (21) without loops (18) which extends between loops (18) across two or more wales in said second set of wales (H-L). A process as claimed in claim 3 or claim 4 characterised in that in a group of courses (a,b,c,d) the number of courses (a,b) knitted having loops (12,13,15,16) pulled to both faces (8,9) of the fabric is equal to the number of courses (c,d) knitted having all, or substantially all, loops (18) pulled to one face (9) of the fabric. A process as claimed in any of claims 3 to 5 characterised in that in the first set of wales (A-G) the said number ratio of loops is at least 4:1. A process as claimed in any preceding claim characterised in that in two successive groups of courses as specified a first set of wales in the first group of courses is knitted in alignment with a second set of wales in the second group of courses and a second set of wales in the first group of courses is knitted in alignment with a first set of wales in the second group of courses (Fig.2). A process as claimed in any preceding claim characterised in that as well as a yarn region (21,30,31) without loops extending between loops (18) across two or more wales in at least one of the courses (c,d) in which all, or substantially all, of the loops are pulled to one face (9) of the fabric, additional yarn regions (14,17) are incorporated extending course-wise without loops across at least one wale in one or more other courses (a,b) in said group of courses. A process as claimed in claim 8 characterised in that said additional yarn regions (14,17) are located in two or more courses (a,b) having loops pulled to both faces (8,9) of the fabric with said additional yarn regions (14) in one such course (a) extending across wales which are different from the wales across which said additional yarn regions (17) extend in another such course (b). A process as claimed in any preceding claim characterised in that in the second set of wales, a yarn region (21,30,31) without loops is incorporated to extend between loops across at least three or four or seven wales. A process as claimed in any preceding claim characterised in that for all, or substantially all, of those courses (c,d) in which all, or substantially all, of the loops (18) are pulled to one face (9) of the fabric and which incorporate said yarn regions extending between loops (18) across at least two wales it is the same face (9) of the fabric to which said loops are pulled. A process as claimed in claims 8 and 11 characterised in that all, or substantially all, of the additional yarn regions (14,17) are incorporated to extend between loops pulled to said same face (9) of the fabric as the loops in the courses which incorporate the yarn regions (21,30,31) extending between loops across at least two wales. A process as claimed in any preceding claim characterised by being carried out on a 12 gauge flat V-bed knitting machine. A process as claimed in any preceding claim characterised in that in at least some courses (a,b) having loops (12,13,15,16) pulled to both faces (8,9) of the fabric, the length of yarn (11) supplied per total needles is less than 0.40 cm and in at least some courses (c,d) in which all, or substantially all, of the loops (18) are pulled to one face (9) of the fabric, the length of yarn supplied per total needles is less than 0.20 cm. A weft knitted double jersey fabric suitable for use as an upholstery fabric wherein at least a substantial part of the fabric is knitted by a process as claimed in any of claims 1 to 14, characterised by an extensibility of no more than 12% in wale and course directions respectively. A weft knitted fabric as claimed in claim 15 characterised by an extensibility of no more than 10% or no more than 8% in wale and course directions respectively. A weft knitted fabric as claimed in claim 15 or 16 characterised by comprising a yarn having a count in the unrelaxed state of from 550 to 850 decitex, preferably 680 to 750 decitex. A weft knitted fabric as claimed in any of claims 15 to 17 characterised by comprising an air-texturised polyester yarn. An upholstery cover for a vehicle seat characterised by comprising weft knitted fabric as claimed in any of claims 15 to 18. An upholstery cover as claimed in claim 19 characterised in that the fabric has been shaped in the knitting to produce a cover which is thereby shaped at least in part to fit the vehicle seat.

Inventors: DAY GERALD FRANCIS, ROBINSON FRANK, DAY, GERALD FRANCIS, ROBINSON, FRANK
Applicants: GEN MOTORS CORP, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Application year: 1991
Main classification: D04B1
IPC codes: D04B1