Acoustic conductance in a system of duct

Abstract: An acoustic conductance (14) is formed with oscillatory planes (16) parallel to a duct (11) and disposed on an identical circumference of the duct (11) along a plane intersecting at right angles to the duct (11) so that the total area of the oscillatory planes (16) will be substantially more than twice as large as a sectional area of the duct (11). The acoustic conductance (14) is thereby made less affective on a fluid and provides a pertinent disposition of the acoustic conductance.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to an acoustic conductance according to the preamble of claim 1 and a silencer utilizing the same according to the preamble of claim 17 and, more particularly, to the acoustic conductance incorporated in a duct system to cope with noises in the system as well as the silencer the subject of which for control is such noises in the duct system. DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART In silencing the noises in the duct system, in general, there have been taken silencing measures of such a so-called passive type arrangement as a provision of expansion chamber and the like which utilizes the interference of sound waves in the duct. In such case, there has been also taken a measure of concurrently using such acoustical absorbent as glass wool or the like so as to elevate the absorption coefficient with respect to the energy that generates the noises in the duct system. Here, the duct itself and the acoustical absorbent disposed in the expansion chamber formed in the duct will be an equivalent to a disposition in series to the duct of a resistor with respect to the noises. With such passive type silencing arrangement, however, it has been difficult to render a complete reflection band to be larger and also to sufficiently achieve the function of acoustical absorption, and it has been found that, in some occasion, there exists a frequency band in which a negative silencing characteristic, that is, an increment of noises arises due to inherent characteristics of acoustic reflecting surface or in the relationship to disposed position of the expansion chamber and so on. Further, when a sufficient silencing action is intended to be attained, there has arisen a problem that required structure of elements for the silencing arrangement in the duct system has to be made remarkably complicated and a loss of transmission pressure is caused to occur. To cope with such problem, it has been suggested in, for example, U.S. Patent No. 2,043,416 to Paul Lueg to provide an arrangement for causing acoustic waves coming as propagated from upstream side of the duct system to completely reflect at a position of secondary noise source back to the upstream side or, in other words, an arrangement for attaining the silencing by superposing on the noises to be absorbed, i.e., a primary noise a noise of reverse phase to the primary noise, i.e., a secondary noise. With this arrangement, so long as the same operates to realize the intended object, there can be formed a complete reflection plane over a wide frequency band of the noises and a complete acoustic absorption can be attained. In many of active control methods currently practiced with respect to the duct system noises, such silencing arrangement as described in the Lueg patent has been employed so that a sound pressure of the primary noise on the secondary noise source will be anticipated from a reference signal on the upstream side of the duct system by utilizing a digital signal processing method so as to cancel the primary noise with the secondary noise provided at the reverse phase. In this case, an ideal operation mode will be that the secondary noise is of the same amplitude as and the reverse phase to the primary noise so as to completely carry out the cancellation or, in other words, to form a complete reflection plane on the secondary noise source, whereby any transmitting propagation of sound to downstream side is no more present and the sound waves are all reflected back to the upstream side. GB-A-2 142 091 discloses an active sound control system to cope with primary noises propagated in a duct, comprising a secondary noise source and an acoustic sensor disposed adjacent to the secondary noise source. The surface area of the oscillatory plane of the secondary noise source and the sectional area of the duct are more or less the same. An arrangement is provided for removing from the signal of the acoustic sensor any contribution attributable to acoustic coupling between the secondary noise source and the acoustic sensor. As an active control method which is less influenced by any variation in noise propagating conditions in the duct system and still easy to be arranged, there has been suggested by K. Eghtesadl et al in 1983 a tight coupling mono-pole (which shall be hereinafter referred to simply as "TCM") in which a microphone for collecting reference signal noise and a loudspeaker as the secondary noise source are disposed at the same position in the duct system. Further, in JP-A-3-174198 disclosing an earlier invention by the present inventors, there has been proposed an acoustic conductance according to the preamble of claim 1 made not to intend any complete reflection at the secondary noise source but with an active element of a simpler arrangement employed. This acoustic conductance may be constructed by a low gain TCM active element, while the acoustic characteristics of this element in the case of the low gain are not for performing the complete reflection but are to act equivalently as a conductance to be equivalently presented as a passive element, and the element can play an effective part which has been unable to attain by any conventional passive element for the silencing in the duct system. (This respect has been described to details in P.1277-P.1280, "inter·noise 90 Volume II" of Science for Silence edited by H. G. Jonasson, Gothenburg-Sweden, 13-15 Aug. 1990.) While it is considered that any arrangement which has been employed as the conventional TCM may be realized theoretically by means of a feedback at a gain of infinity of signals from an acoustic sensor disposed closely to the secondary noise source to the particular secondary noise source, there have been such various problems in practice that: 1. required sound pressure and volume velocity cannot be obtained for attaining a sufficient function, unless the secondary noise source is the one proper with respect to the characteristic impedance of the duct; 2. since the sound wave generated from the secondary noise source still cannot reach fully a plane wave at a portion in the duct in close proximity to the secondary noise source, the acoustic signal of the noise collected by the acoustic sensor is improper so as to cause the oscillation to occur but no gains to attain, and no sufficient function can be attained; 3. due to a phase characteristic in the acoustic sensor and/or the secondary noise source, the reverse phase noise generated at the secondary noise source involves a delay with respect to the sound wave propagated within the duct, so that an oscillation will take place, no large gain can be obtained and an available frequency range will be made narrower; 4. in an event where noise generating source includes a sound of a high frequency component which is a cause of the oscillation due to the phase characteristic of the acoustic sensor and secondary noise source, the oscillation can be easily excited; 5. since the arrangement is to expose the acoustic sensor to the fluid inside the duct, there arises such influence of the fluid as acoustic arch-fact (a windblown noise caused by the fluid) is caused to occur and to be detected together with the noises propagated, and the acoustic sensor and secondary noise source are deteriorated in the durability due to heat, dust, mist and so on; and 6. there is a possibility that a stable operation cannot be attained due to a rise in the gain of the oscillation loop with a temperature change in the duct, deterioration with age and the like, which occasionally causes the oscillation to occur. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION A primary object of the present invention is, therefore, to provide a proper acoustic conductance arrangement for eliminating such problems as in the above, reducing any influence on the fluid and realizing the performance theoretically expected and, in particular, proper arrangements for the acoustic sensor and secondary noise source. According to the present invention, the above object can be realized by means of an acoustic conductance according to the preamble of claim 1 and having the features of the characterizing part of claim 1 The invention further provides a preferred embodiment characterized by the features of claim 17 Other objects and advantages of the present invention shall be made clear as an explanation of embodiments of the invention advances in the followings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIGURE 1 is a schematic longitudinally sectioned view in an embodiment of the acoustic conductance according to the present invention; FIG. 2 is a schematic cross sectioned view of the embodiment of FIG. 1 at a position rotated by 90 degrees from that of FIG. 1; FIG. 3 is a schematic longitudinally sectioned view in another embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 4 is a schematic cross sectioned view of the embodiment of FIG. 3 at a position rotated by 90 degrees from that of FIG. 3; FIG. 5 through 10 are schematic cross sectioned views in respectively different embodiments of the acoustic conductance in which the secondary noise source is disposed in accordance with the present invenion; FIG. 11 is an explanatory view in a working aspect with the secondary noise source and sensor arranged according to the present invention; FIG. 12 is a diagram for showing varying silencing characteristics depending on the position of the sensor in the working aspect of FIG. 11; FIG. 13 is a diagram showing differences in the sound pressure level upon carrying out of the silencing action with the sensor shifted onto the upstream side in the aspect of FIG. 11; FIGS. 14 and 15 are schematic explanatory views of another embodiment employing a slit-like element according to the present invention; FIGS. 16 and 17 are explanatory views of still other working aspects employing the slit-like element; FIG. 18 is a diagram showing varying effect of improvements due to differences in the formation of the slit-like element of the present invention; FIG. 19 is a diagram for showing differences in the silencing characteristics depending on the presence or absence of an acoustic absorption material according to the present invention; FIG. 20 is a schematic explanatory view of still another embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 21 is a diagram showing in the sound pressure level the silencing action with the embodiment of FIG. 20; FIG. 22 is a schematic explanatory view of a further embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 23 is a diagram showing by means of the sound pressure level the silencing action attained with the embodiment of FIG. 22; FIG. 24 is a schematic explanatory view of a still further embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 25 is a diagram showing by means of the sound pressure level the silencing action attained with the embodiment of FIG. 24; FIG. 26 is a schematic explanatory view of a further concrete embodiment of the silencer employing the acoustic conductance according to the present invention; FIG. 27 is a diagram showing circuit operation of the silencer of FIG. 26; FIG. 28 is a schematic explanatory view of still another embodiment according to the present invention; FIG. 29 is a diagram showing frequency response of a filter circuit in the silencer of FIG. 28; FIGS. 30 to 32 are schematic explanatory views of further embodiments of the silencer according to the present invention; and FIG. 33 is an explanatory diagram for an operation of an amplification fluctuating circuit in the silencer of FIG. 32. While the present invention shall now be explained with reference to the various embodiments, it should be appreciated that the intention is not to limit the present invention only to these embodiments shown but rather to include all alterations, modifications and equivalent arrangements possible within the scope of appended claims. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, there is shown an embodiment of the acoustic conductance according to the present invention, which is contributive to a formation of a low gain TCM or, in other words, an active acoustic conductance (which shall be hereinafter referred to simply as "AAC"). In this case, a main duct 11 has an expansion chamber 12 as a passive silencer with an acoustic absorption material 13 inserted therein, and an acoustic conductance 14 is combined with this expansion chamber 12. More concretely, the acoustic conductance 14 is formed by assembling to the passive silencer 12 an acoustic sensor 15, secondary noise source 16 and a processing and amplifying means 17. For the acoustic sensor 15, a microphone may be generally employed, while not required to be limited thereto but, for example, an oscillation pick-up or the like may be also employed. For the secondary noise source 16, it is general that a loudspeaker is used while not required to be particularly limited thereto. In the event where the loudspeaker is employed, it should be appreciated that such speaker box 19 as shown by imaginary lines is to be provided. Further, a plurality of the secondary noise sources 16 are provided around the expansion chamber 12, that is, on an identical circumference along a plane intersecting at right angles the longitudinal axis of the duct 11, and the acoustic sensor 15 is disposed at a position slightly on upstream side with respect to the center of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A. In this case, the position where the optimum acoustic conductance is to be constructed should be chosen to be about 1/3 of the length of the expansion chamber 12, while not required to be so limited. As seen from these secondary noise sources 16 and 16A, it is necessary that radiations of the sound waves are producted on both of the upstream and downstream sides in the duct 11. In order to achieve the radiation in the duct 11 with the required sound pressure and volume velocity, it is optimum to employ the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A having the areas of more than twice as large as that of the cross sectional area of the duct 11. In order that such conditions are satisfied, except for an event where the duct is flat, a plurality of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A are provided to the duct 11 on the identical circumference thereof as has been described, and the individual one of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A may be reduced in the amplitude since the required magnitude of the noise source, i.e., the volume velocity and sound pressure are fixed. For this reason, it is made possible to dispose the acoustic sensor 15 in proximity to the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A, taking advantage of multiplicative effect of a ring formation of the noise sources in which any phase delay in the respective secondary noise sources is reduced, and of the amplitude reduction in each of the plurality of the noise sources. In practical use, the arrangement should preferably be made in such that two of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A each having almost the same area as the cross sectional area of the duct 11 are provided to oppose each other. In this case, it is made possible for the two secondary noise sources 16 and 16A to commonly utilize the signal of the single acoustic sensor 15 by disposing this sensor 15 within a plane of symmetry of the two secondary noise sources 16 and 16A. This will allow the arrangement made simpler than in the event where a plurality of the acoustic sensors 15 are employed, and the disposition of the acoustic sensor 15 with respect to wall surface of the duct 11 becomes also simpler. Further, when the acoustic sensor 15 is provided to be slightly on upstream side with respect to the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A, it is made possible to attain the phase delay correction as well as a formation of a zone in which reverse phase noise generated by the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A will become a plane wave. For this reason, there can be obtained a distance corresponding to a delay time of the reverse phase sound wave generated from the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A with respect to the sound waves propagated through the duct 11 as caused by the phase delay of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A. Further, while the generated sound waves of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A cannot be deemed to be plane waves at a closely proximate to the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A within the duct 11, there can be formed excellently plane waves at a position on slightly upstream side thereof even when the sound wave signal collected by the acoustic sensor 15 closely proximate to the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A is improper and no oscillation or gain rises. In front face of the sound pressure generating plane of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A, there is provided a slit-like element 18 to attain an impedence matching between the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A and the duct 11. While the element 18 is not required to be limited in the shape of the slit or its opening rate, it is possible that a slit of an elongated ellipse or the like shape the major axis of which lies in flowing direction of the objective noise to be controlled is optimum, depending on the system of the acoustic absorption to be formed. Further, the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A and acoustic sensor 15 as well are protected at their periphery by the acoustic absorption material 13 of a glass wool or the like which also functions as a heat insulating member, so as to isolate them from the fluid within the duct 11, whereby any high frequency component which will be a cause of an oscillation or the like due to the acoustic absorption material 13 can be attenuated and any resonance of the duct 11 can be restrained, that is, no howling is caused to occur so as to stabilize the operation of the acoustic conductance as the AAC. According to the present invention, in addition, the AAC can be optimumly constituted. Here, the term "AAC" is to refer to a sensor for collecting the reference signal, which is the one formed by disposing the microphone 15 and secondary noise source 16 substantially at the same position or proximate to each other to have the gain restricted to be relatively low, for example, less than about 20 dB and to have the sensor operated within a range causing no oscillation. This is an intention to have the AAC operated as an incomplete reflection plane a stable operation of which is easy to attain, whereas the intention of the conventional TCM is to achieve the complete reflection plane the operation of which is apt to become unstable. With the AAC, the noise signals collected by such acoustic sensor 15 as the microphone are subjected to such optimum signal processing as an inversion, so that, as amplified by the amplifier 17, a reverse-phase noise will be radiated out of such secondary noise source 16 as a loudspeaker or the like. As has been described, the acoustic conductance 14 comprising the acoustic sensor 15, secondary noise sources 16 and signal processing and amplifying means 17 is provided to the expansion chamber 12, so that the sound waves propagated from the upstream side in the duct 11 will be reflected or absorbed by this acoustic conductance 14 and acoustic absorption material 13 to be thereby silenced. Here, the total area of the oscillating plane of the plurality (two in the drawings) of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A provided around the expansion chamber 12 is set to be about twice as large or more as the sectional area of the expansion chamber 12, so that the sound waves radiated by the plurality of secondary noise sources 16 and 16A within the expansion chamber 12 will form a ring-like noise source in the space of the expansion chamber 12 in front of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A and, thus, a sound field of the reverse phase matching with the characteristic impedance of the expansion chamber 12. Further, this matching with the characteristic impedance can be promoted by the slit-like elements 18 disposed in front of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A. With the foregoing impedance matching, it is made easier that the plane waves propagate and, with the driving of the plurality of the secondary noise sources rather than a single secondary noise source, it is made possible to reduce the oscillation amplitude per each of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A, to also reduce the phase delay of the respective sources and to further provide the acoustic sensor 15 in proximity with the center position of the secondary noise sources 16 and 16A. The acoustic absorption material 13 of the glass wool or the like disposed in the expansion chamber 12 and functioning also as the heat insulating member is effective to attenuate the high frequency component which can be a cause of the oscillation or the like due to the phase change, so as to restrain any resonance, while functioning as a resistance component in series with the transmission path so as to act to further elevate the silencing effect in the concurrent use with the parallel acoustic conductance. Since the arrangement is so made, further by the acoustic absorption material 13, that the acoustic sensor 15 and secondary noise sources 16 and 16A are not exposed directly to the fluid within the expansion chamber 12 so as to be less influenced by the fuild, any influence of the acoustic arch-fact (windblown noise and so on) can be restricted, and the acoustic sensor and secondary noise source can be prevented from being deteriorated by the heat, dust and mist. On the other hand, the acoustic conductance according to the present invention may be applied directly to the duct 11 without providing any expansion chamber, as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, in which substantially the same constituents as those in the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2 are denoted by the same reference numerals as those used in FIGS. 1 and 2 but with a figure "10" added thereto, and, except for the provision of the expansion chamber, substantially the same operation can be preformed. For the arrangement of the acoustic sensor, secondary noise source and acoustic absorption material, it is possible to employ such various arrangements as shown respectively in FIG. 5 where three of the secondary noise sources 36, 36A and 36B are disposed on an identical circumference of the duct 31 of a circuit section as mutually spaces by an angle equally set, in FIG. 6 where four of the secondary noise sources 46, 46A, 46B and 46C are provided on a circumference to be identical with respect to the flow within the duct 41 of a rectangular section, and in FIG. 7 where four of the secondary noise sources 56, 56A, 56B and 56C are provided on a circumference to be identical with respect to the flow within the duct 51 of a circular section. Further arrangements employable will be that as shown in FIG. 8 where the acoustic sensor 65 is embedded in the acoustic absorption material 63 surrounding the inner wall of the duct 61, that as in FIG. 9 where the acoustic sensor 75 is positioned in the center of the duct 71 as enclosed by the acoustic absorption material 73, and that as in FIG. 10 where a partition made of the acoustic absorption material 83 is provided and the acoustic sensor 85 is embended within this partition. In these embodiments of FIGS. 5 to 10, substantially the same constituents as in the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2 are denoted by the same reference numerals as those used in FIGS. 1 and 2 but with a figure "20", "30", "40", "50", "60" or "70" added sequentially, and substantially the same operation can be realized. In the foregoing embodiments shown in FIGS. 1 through 10, further, there have been suggested the arrangements in which the acoustic conductance is applied to the AAC, while not required to be limited to them, but it is also possible to apply the invention to an acoustic damper or the like. This acoustic damper is to mean the one which deforms by itself in accordance with variation in the sound pressure due to the noise and absorbs the energy by means of a resistance accompanying the deformation, and such articles as a corn part of a loudspeaker having a viscosity equivalently to the oscillation, rubber film having the viscosity, or a piston are to be included. In addition, various silencing tests have been carried out with respect to the foregoing acoustic conductance according to the present invention, examples of which are as will be described in the followings. A. Silencing Effect of Sectional Area of Duct and Oscillatory Area of Noise Source: Example No. Acoustic Conductance Arrangement R Silencing Effect (dB) 1 Duct of 10cm square with 1 loudspeaker 0.75 6 2 Duct of 10cm square with 2 loudspeakers 1.50 8 3 Duct of 75mm diameter with 2 loudspeakers 2.50 18 In the above, "R" is a rate (oscillatory area of secondary noise source/sectional area of duct). In Example 3, in addition to the use of a circular duct, there was provided an expansion chamber of a sectional area twice as large as that of the duct. It should be appreciated that, as will be clear when Examples 1 and 2 are compared with each other, therefore, the silencing effect is improved with an increment in the total oscillatory surface area of the secondary noise sources so long as the sectional area of the duct is constant, that is, with the enlargement of the oscillatory surface area of the secondary noise source in contrast to the sectional area of the duct, and that, as will be clear when Examples 1 and 3 are compared with each other, the silencing effect is remarkably improved by providing the expansion chamber and further enlarging the oscillatory area of the secondary noise sources. In other words, the remarkable silencing effect is to be obtained when the oscillatory area of the secondary noise source is made about twice as large as the sectional area of the duct. B. Acoustic Sensor Position and Silencing Effect: With the position of microphone as the acoustic sensor varied as shown in FIG. 11, the silencing has been carried out, the comparison of the sound pressure level changes upon which is shown in FIGS. 12 and 13. More concretely, the sound pressure changes caused when the microphone is shifted by 6cm and 10cm onto the upstream side from the center of the speaker, in an arrangement where two loudspeakers as two secondary noise sources are disposed as opposed with respect to the duct formed to be 50mm in diameter, are shown in FIG. 12. As a result, the sound pressure changes in the event where the acoustic sensor is positioned immediately downstream of the secondary noise source will be as represented by dotted-line curve in FIG. 12, the changes will be as represented by a broken-line curve when the sensor position is separated 6cm from the secondary noise source, and the changes will be as represented by a chain-line curve in the drawing when the sensor position is further separated 10cm. Thus, it is considered optimum that, when AAC is constituted, the acoustic sensor is disposed immediately below the secondary noise source. With the acoustic sensor disposed closer to the secondary noise source, it is made unnecessary to render the transmission function complicated. On the other hand, it is not preferable in practice that the acoustic sensor is positioned excessively closer to the secondary noise source. In FIG. 12, a solid-line curve represents a case in which AAC is in OFF state. Further, there are shown in FIG. 13 the sound pressure level fluctuation upon shifting of the acoustic sensor respectively by 5cm, 10cm and 15cm onto the upstream side from the center of the loudspeaker, with the speaker center denoted by "0", in the arrangement where two of the secondary noise sources are disposed as opposed to each other with respect to the duct of 100mm square. In this case, the speaker and amplifier different from those used in the example of FIG. 12 have been employed. Improvement factor upon disposition of the acoustic sensor above the secondary noise source (the acoustic sensor or microphone position 0mm) is presented and, as will be appreciated, the position of the microphone as the acoustic sensor is different in accordance with the form of the duct and the type of the speaker or the like as the secondary noise source. It has been found from FIG. 13 that no remarkable deterioration in the silencing effect and a stable improvement is obtainable in the event where the microphone position is slightly on the upstream side of the secondary noise source, practically 5cm upstream, preferably, in the embodiment of FIG. 11, in contrast to other case where the position is more remote. Therefore, while slightly variable in accordance with the form of the duct, oscillative area of the secondary noise source and so on, it is considered that the optimum microphone position should exist slightly on upstream side of the secondary noise source. The distance by which the acoustic sensor is separated from the secondary noise source can be made much smaller in the case where the oscillatory area of the secondary noise source is more than twice as large as the sectional area of the duct than in the case of less than twice large, and it is advantageous the transmission factor between the acoustic sensor and the secondary noise source needs not be made complicated. In FIG. 13, a curve plotted with "o" marks represents a case where the sensor position is 5cm upstream, a curve with "▵" denotes 10cm upstream and a curve with "□" marks denote 15cm upstream. C.Relationship Between Secondary Noise Source Area and Acoustic Sensor Position: Examples have been carried out employing a microphone used as the acoustic sensor and loudspeakers respectively having a sound-pressure generating plane substantially equivalent to the sectional area of the duct, resultant relationship of which have been as shown in a following Table II in which the area size of the employed loudspeaker is shown for convenience' sake in the number of the loudspeaker. Example No. Number of Loudspeaker Optimum Distance (mm) 4 1 100 5 2 50 6 4 40 Here, the optimum distance is the one between the microphone as the acoustic sensor and the loudspeaker and at a position of the former where the silencing characteristics are the best. In these examples, the loudspeaker employed was of the sound-pressure generating plane of 100mm (sectional area of 7,850mm²), and the duct was made to be of a diameter 75mm (sectional area of 4,415mm²). While the optimum position of the microphone forming the acoustic sensor varies depending on the shape of the duct and the type of the loudspeaker forming the secondary noise source, the optimum distance is apt to become shorter than the foregoing sensor position. D. Slit-like Element at Front of Secondary Noise Source and Silencing Effect: The silencing effect can be remarkably improved in the event where such slit 118 at shown in FIGS. 14 and 15 or such slit 128 or 138 as shown in FIG. 16 or 17 is provided at the front face of the secondary noise source. Of course, the slit formation should not be limited to those shown in FIGS. 14 to 17 but may properly be modified. In FIG. 18, the silencing improvements caused by the provision of the slit are shown, in which a curve plotted with "o" marks denotes a case of such provision of such circular slit as shown in FIG. 15 with an opening rate of 30% of the oscillatory area of the loudspeaker as the secondary noise source, a curve with "▵" marks denotes a case of such rectangular slit as in FIG. 16 the longitudinal axis of which lying in axial direction of the duct and an opening rate of 63% of the oscillatory area, and a curve with "x" marks denotes a case of such rectangular slit as in FIG. 17 the longitudinal axis of which transversing at right angles the axial direction of the duct and an opening rate of 63% of the oscillatory area. It should be appreciated, as would be clear from FIG. 18, that the silencing action is best improved in the case of "o" mark curve without showing any tendency of shifting to minus side and thus without increasing the noises, while the case of "▵" mark curve also achieves an excellent silencing function. E. Silencing Characteristics Upon Concurrent Use of Acoustic Absorption Material: In FIG. 19, there is shown the silencing amount upon actuation of the AAC in both cases where the acoustic absorption material is provided and is not provided. In the drawing, a solid-line curve is of the case where a glass wool is provided as the acoustic absorption material, and a dotted-line curve is of the case of no acoustic absorption material. It is seen from these curves that the howling can hardly be generated in the case where the glass wool is provided as the acoustic absorption material so that the AAC actuation can be stabilized. Further, the acoustic conductance according to the present invention also results in an excellent effect when provided at two positions on the duct which communicating with a noise source S as shown in FIG. 20. In the drawing, substantially the same constituents as those in the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2 are indicated by the same reference numerals as those in FIGS. 1 and 2 but with "190" added, which constituents realizing the same operation. In FIG. 21, there are shown attenuations in respect of the embodiment of FIG. 20, in which a broken-line curve represents variation in the sound pressure only of the duct, a chain-line curve represents the sound pressure variation in the duct with the amplifying means of the acoustic conductance made in OFF state, and a solid-line curve denotes the sound pressure variation in the duct with the amplifying means of AAC made ON and the acoustic conductance actuated into ON state. It has been found from these curves that the arrangement of FIG. 20 with the AAC kept in actuated state can attain the silencing by about 25 dB in average and a remarkable silencing effect can be obtained with this system, in perticular, at a zone close to 500Hz. In an embodiment shown in FIG. 22, there is provided an arrangement in which the duct 211 is provided with the expansion chamber 212 filled with a glass wool as the acoustic absorption material 213 and the acoustic conductance is disposed at a position downstream of this expansion chamber 212. In the drawing, the same constituents as those in the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2 are indicated by the same reference numerals as those used in FIGS. 1 and 2 but with "200" added, which constituents realizing also the same operation. In FIG. 23, there are shown attenuations in respect of the embodiment of FIG. 22, in which a broken-line curve denotes the sound-pressure variation only of the duct, a chain-line curve shows the sound-pressure variation in an event where the duct is provided only with an expansion chamber, and a solid-line curve represents the sound-pressure variation in the case of the FIG. 22 arrangement in which the duct is provided with both of the expansion chamber and acoustic conductance, and it should be appreciated that the provision of the expansion chamber and acoustic conductance to the duct allows a remarkable silencing effect to be attained. In an embodiment shown in FIG. 24, there is provided an arrangement in which the duct 221 is provided with the expansion chamber 222 carrying the acoustic conductance, the expansion chamber 222 is filled with a glass wool as the acoustic absorption material 223, and another acoustic conductance is disposed downstream of the chamber. In the drawing, the same constituents as those in the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2 are denoted by the same reference numerals as those used in FIGS. 1 and 2 but with "210" added, and the same operation can be realized by these constituents. In FIG. 25, there are shown attenuations in respect of the embodiment of FIG. 24, in which a broken-line curve denotes the sound-pressure characteristic only of the duct, a chain-line curve shows the sound-pressure characteristic in an event where the duct is provided only with an expansion chamber, and a solid-line curve represents the sound-pressure characteristic in the case of FIG. 24 where the acoustic conductance is provided to the expansion chamber and to the duct downstream of the chamber, and it is seen that a further excellent silencing effect can be attained with the FIG. 24 arrangement. According to another feature of the present invention, there can be provided a silencer which appropriately restricts the amplification degree at the amplifying means of the acoustic conductance in a state where the howling will take place. Referring to FIG. 26, the silencer in this embodiment according to the present invention includes a signal generating circuit 303 connected to a microphone 301 forming the acoustic sensor and a loudspeaker 302 forming the secondary noise source for generating a signal for driving the loudspeaker 302 on the basis of an output signal of the microphone 301, while this signal processing circuit 303 comprises an inverting amplifier circuit 303A acting simultaneously as an amplifying section and as a phase inverting section, and an AGC circuit 303B which is an amplification degree control section. This AGC circuit 303B attains a feedback control of the inverting amplifier circuit 303A so that the amplification degree of the inverting amplifier circuit 303A will be controlled in accordance with output signal level of the microphone 301 provided as input to the circuit 303A, that is, an amplitude voltage, such as shown in FIG. 27. More specifically, in FIG. 27, the amplification degree of the inverting amplifier circuit 303A is made to be of a constant value Go until the amplitude voltage of the output signal of the microphone 301 reaches a first threshold value V1, and, as the amplitude voltage exceeds the first threshold value V1, the amplification degree is decreased at a constant decrement in accordance with the increment in the amplitude voltage. Further, as the amplitude voltage exceeds a second threshold value V2, the decrement of the amplification degree is inlarged. When in this case the amplification degree Go in the event where the amplitude voltage of the microphone output signal is below the first threshold voltage V1 is so set as to be of a level of causing no howling, the exceeding of the microphone output signal over the first threshold voltage V1 and showing a tendency of the howling to take place will cause the amplification degree to be lowered and the howling occurrence can be thereby restrained. When the amplitude voltage further exceeds the second threshold value V2, the decrement of the amplification degree is further enlarged and the howling occurrence can be reliably prevented. In another embodiment as shown in FIG. 28 of the present invention, a filter circuit 314 acting as a frequency characteristics control section is inserted between the inverting amplifier circuit 313A and the loudspeaker 312, in order to correct the frequency characteristics in a loop of the microphone 311 → signal processing circuit 313 → loudspeaker 312 → microphone 311. For this filter circuit 314, a low-pass filter having such frequency response as shown in FIG. 29 may be employed. With the use of such filter circuit 314 having such characteristic, the amplification degree of the high frequency component in the above loop can be restrained. Since the high frequency component has a higher possibility of causing the howling to occur, in general, the use of the filter circuit 314 having such characteristic allows the effect of restraining the howling to be increased. That is, for the low frequency component, it is possible to render the amplification degree of the above loop to be larger, so that the silencing effect with respect to the noises of a larger sound pressure level of the low frequency component can be elevated. While the embodiment of FIG. 28 has been shown to insert the filter circuit 314 between the inverting amplifier circuit 313A and the loudspeaker 312, this filter circuit 314 may be inserted as connected either to an output part or an input part of the AGC circuit 313B. Further, the frequency response of the filter circuit 314 is not always to be limited to such characteristics as in FIG. 29 but may properly be set depending on the object. In a further embodiment as shown in FIG. 30 according to the present invention, there is inserted between the inverting amplifier circuit 313A and the loudspeaker 322 a phase fluctuation circuit 324 acting as a phase fluctuating section which provides a fluctuation to the phase of the output signal of the microphone 321. In this cace, the phase fluctuation circuit 324 is to cause the phase of the output signal of the microphone 321 to be fluctuated with respect to the signal of the phase inverted at the inverting amplifier circuit 323A to be different 180 degrees. Provided that the width of the phase fluctuation is, for example, ±α(α=180) degrees, the driving signal for the loudspeaker 322 will be a signal of a phase deviated by (180±α) degrees with respect to the output signal of the microphone 321. Such phase fluctuation circuit 324 may be constituted by means of, for example, a delay circuit and switching element, so that ON/OFF operation of the switching element at indefinite intervals will cause a signal delay by means of the delay circuit to occur at the indefinite intervals. According to the foregoing silencing arrangement of FIG. 30, the phase relationship between the output signal of the microphone 321 and the driving signal for the loudspeaker 322 and even becoming to satisfy the conditions for causing the howling to occur at a specific time will be fluctuated immediately thereafter. Consequently, the howling generating conditions are not satisfied, and the howling generation can be restrained. In other words, the howling generation which is apt to occur when the amplification degree is made larger can be effectively restrained, even when the amplification degree in the above loop is set to be large so as to elevate the silencing effect. While in the above embodiment the phase fluctuation circuit 324 is shown to be inserted between the inverting amplifier circuit 323A and the loudspeaker 322, by the way, it is also possible to insert this phase fluctuation circuit 324 either in the output section or the input section of the AGC circuit 323B. In another embodiment of the present invention as shown in FIG. 31, a frequency detecting circuit 334 capable of detecting the howling is inserted in the input section of the AGC circuit 333B. In this case, the AGC circuit 333B acting as an amplification control section is controlled upon detection by the frequency detecting circuit 334 of a signal of an oscillation (single frequency or the like), and the amplification degree in the loop of the microphone 331 → signal processing circuit 333 → loudspeaker 332 → microphone 331 is lowered. For the AGC circuit 333B, the one which can change over the amplification degree of the inverting amplifier circuit 333A at two stages before and after the howling generation is to be employed. For the frequency detecting circuit 334, a PLL circuit or the like may be employed. Since the howling is to normally oscillate at a single frequency, the howling generation can be exactly detected by the frequency detecting circuit 334. Upon occurrence of the howling, on the other hand, the circuit 334 lowers effectively the amplification degree of the foregoing loop for restraining the howling. With this arrangement, the howling even generated can be immediately stopped and the amplification degree at the foregoing loop can be effectively increased, so that the silencing effect can be increased. In still another embodiment shown in FIG. 32 according to the present invention, an amplification fluctuating circuit 344 is employed in place of the AGC circuit, and this amplification fluctuating circuit 344 is constituted to vary the amplification degree of the inverting amplifier circuit 343A with the lapse of time in such manner as shown in FIG. 33. That is, when the amplification degree of the inverting amplifier circuit 343A upon occurrence of the howling is made Gs, the amplification fluctuating circuit 344 causes the amplification degree Gs in a predetermined range (Ga<Gs< Gb) with the lapse of time, so that the amplification degree will be controllably varied periodically in such a saw-tooth wave form as shown in FIG. 33 with the lapse of time. According to the arrangement of FIG. 32, the amplification degree even when the same in a loop of the microphone 341 → signal processing circuit 343 → loudspeaker 342 → microphone 341 is made large to cause the howling to occur will be lowered at a next moment so as not to allow the howling conditions to be satisfied, and the howling occurrence can be restrained. On the other hand, though intermittent, it is possible to provide to the above loop a larger amplification degree Gb than the amplification degree Gs which allows the howling to occur, so that the silencing amount can be increased. Though in this case the silencing amount varied in response to the variation in the amplification degree causes the objective sound waves of the silencing to involve a phenomenon of irregularity, it should be appreciated that a setting of the amplification fluctuating circuit 344 for variation by 1/f fluctuation of the sound wave after the silencing will be able to alleviate the irregularity phenomenon. While in the respective embodiments of FIGS. 26 to 33 the phase inversion is shown to be realized by the inverting amplifier circuit, the phase inversion may be attained by connecting the circuit to the loudspeaker as the secondary noise source in reverse polarity. While analog signal is employed for internal precessing at the signal processing circuit, it may be possible to employ a D/A processor in place of the signal processing circuit to have the internal processing carried out by a digital signal.

Claims: An acoustic conductance incorporated in a system of duct for providing a conductance of equivalently finite magnitude to cope with primary noises propagated in the system, the acoustic conductance comprising a secondary noise source having an oscillatory surface disposed to face an axis of said duct, an acoustic sensor disposed adjacent to said secondary noise source, and means for phase-inverting and amplifying an output of said acoustic sensor, characterized in that said oscillatory surface of said secondary noise source has a surface area substantially more than twice as large as the area of a section of said duct at the position of said secondary noise surface, whereby the secondary noise source provides a sound pressure and a volume velocity which cope with sound pressure and volume velocity of said primary noises so as to silence the primary noises. The acoustic conductance of claim 1, characterized in that said oscillatory surface is constituted by a plurality of said secondary noise sources, respective oscillatory surfaces of which are disposed on a circumferential line along said section of said duct to provide in their total area said surface area more than twice as large as said sectional area of the duct. The acoustic conductance of claim 1, characterized in that a plurality of sets of said secondary noise source, acoustic sensor and phase-inverting and amplifying means are disposed at a plurality of said positions mutually spaced in longitudinal direction of said duct. The acoustic conductance of claim 3, characterized in that a plurality of said secondary noise sources are provided at every one of said positions mutually spaced, and said oscillatory surface is constituted by a plurality of oscillatory surfaces of the secondary noise sources at every spaced position. The acoustic conductance of claim 2, characterized in that said plurality of said oscillatory surfaces of the secondary noise sources are disposed to oppose each other with respect to said axial line of said duct. The acoustic conductance of claim 2, characterized in that said plurality of the oscillatory surfaces are provided in a pair. The acoustic conductance of claim 1, characterized in that a slit-like element is provided to said oscillatory surface for matching impedance between said secondary noise source and said duct with shape and opening rate of said element. The acoustic conductance of claim 7, characterized in that said slit-like impedance matching element is elongated along said axial line of said duct. The acoustic conductance of claim 1, characterized in that said acoustic sensor is provided for collecting a noise signal in said duct and processing said noise signal so as to drive said secondary noise source. The acoustic conductance of claim 9, characterized in that said acoustic sensor is provided to said duct as disposed to be deviated by a slight distance on upstream side of the center of said oscillatory plane of the secondary noise source with respect to said primary noises. The acoustic conductance of claim 9, characterized in that said acoustic sensor is disposed to be at a distance from said secondary noise source set to be shorter than that between the secondary noise source and the acoustic sensor if said total area of the oscillatory plane was made substantially less than twice as large as the sectional area of said duct. The acoustic conductance of claim 9, characterized in that said acoustic sensor is provided to said duct as isolated from a fluid flowing in the duct and causing said primary noises. The acoustic conductance of claim 1, characterized in that said duct is provided on inner periphery with a layer of an acoustic absorption material. The acoustic conductance of claim 13, characterized in that said duct is formed to have a radial expansion chamber, and said acoustic absorption material layer is disposed in said expansion chamber. The acoustic conductance of claim 13, characterized in that said secondary noise source is disposed on the outer periphery of said acoustic absorption material layer. The acoustic conductance of claim 9, characterized in that said duct is provided on its inner periphery with a layer of an acoustic absorption material, and said secondary noise source and said acoustic sensor are disposed on the outer periphery of said acoustic absorption material layer. An accoustic conductance incorporated in a system of duct to cope with primary noises propagated in the system, according to claim 1, characterized in that the system of duct includes a silencer comprising said acoustic conductance including said secondary noise source having said oscillatory plane, acoustic sensor and amplifying means, and a signal processing means connected to said acoustic conductance and sensor for preventing howling from occurring. The silencer of claim 17, characterized in that said signal processing means comprises means for amplifying an output signal of said acoustic sensor, means for inverting the phase of said output signal of said acoustic sensor, and an amplification control means for lowering the amplification degree of said amplifying means when said output signal of the acoustic sensor exceeds a predetermined threshold value.

Inventors: MORI TAKUJI, TAKEYAMA HIROAKI, TAKI MASAO, MORI, TAKUJI, TAKEYAMA, HIROAKI, TAKI, MASAO
Applicants: MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC WORKS LTD, NISHIWAKI LAB, MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC WORKS, LTD., NISHIWAKI LABORATORY
Application year: 1991
Main classification: F16L55
IPC codes: G10K11, F16L55