EFFLUENT TREATMENT

Abstract: A method of treating photographic effluent by precipitating or otherwise removing harmful pollutants to provide an environmentally acceptable liquid phase and a disposable solid phase. The pollutants are removed from the effluent by the addition of chemical reagents which sequentially cause different pollutants or their derivatives to precipitate. A time delay may be necessary between certain additions to allow completion of that reaction and prevent interference from other reactions. The method is preferably carried out in a single vessel.

Description: EFFLUENT TREATMENT This invention relates to effluent treatment, and in particular to the removal of polluting materials from photographic effluent to render it more environmentally acceptable, by the sequential 5 treatment of the effluent with chemical reagents which will cause differential precipitation of the. pollutants. The overflow from a photographic processor will typically consist of polluting substances such as lO heavy metal ions, sequestering agents, substances that have a high oxygen demand and colour developing agents and their derivatives, straight disposal of which contravenes sewer regulations in many parts of the world. It is therefore essential that the overflow is ■* -- • ' converted by chemical or physical means to a liquid which can be poured into the sewer and/or a residual solid which can be removed to a place of safe and legal disposal. It is known that addition of an oxidising ~ - v agent to liquid effuent will reduce the chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the mixture by converting the reducing sulphur compounds to their oxidised form by destruction of thiosulphate and by precipitation of silver salts, as described in the Proceedings of the 5 SPSE conference on "Environmental Issues in Photofinishing" 1987. Furthermore, Japanese Patent No. 51099854 describes the use of an oxide, hydroxide or water soluble salt of an alkaline earth metal to precipitate heavy metal ions in a photographic waste 0 effluent. The use of activated carbon to remove colour developing agents, and of an ion-exchange resin to remove a sequestering agent, such as ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) is also established in the art. 5 However, nowhere has there been described or even suggested that these steps may be combined into a sequential effluent treatment, preferably effected in a single vessel, in which polluting materials are removed from a liquid chemical effluent by adding reagents that sequentially cause different pollutants or their derivatives to precipitate. A time delay may be necessary between additions to allow one reaction to complete before another is started, if the reactions will or might interfere. Such a differential precipitation technique has many advantages in that the mechanical means, number of steps for separations and total process times are all reduced by removing transfer and separation procedures. Treatment in one vessel is less expensive than using individual units, allows a small compact module for treating the effuent at small processing sites and results in a small mass and volume of easily disposable solid wastes. The process can be applied to the mixed overflows from all the baths in the photographic processing machine or to the overflow from a single bath that is contaminated by more than one polluting substance. The effluent to be treated may, for example, have arisen from any of the photographic processes described in Item 308119, Research Disclosure December 1989, Industrial Opportunities Ltd., Hants., U.K., and especially sections XIX, XX and XXIII thereof. The one—vessel method would be applicable furthermore to any liquid chemical effuent that was deleterious to the environment providing a chemical or physical means of precipitating the damaging -components could be found. The solids produced from the above reactions' can be removed by some mechanical means in one process step, such as centrifugation or filtration, in particular as described in co—pending U.K. application No. 9019607.2, filed on even date herewith, in which an inert powder of high bulk increases the 5 effectiveness and rate of filtration. Preferably this powder may be added during sequential precipitation treatment rather than as a final stage of the effluent treatment. According to the present invention therefore 10 there is provided a method of treating photographic effluent by precipitating or otherwise removing harmful pollutants to provide an environmentally acceptable liquid phase and a disposable solid phase. Preferably the separation is carried out by ,c differential precipitation of the pollutants through sequential addition of chemical reagents. The order in which the different precipitants are added may be varied or more than one precipitant may be added simultaneously. However for effective 2 treatment it is advisable to add the oxidising agent as the initial stage. Conveniently, a short period is then allowed for the necessary reactions to occur, otherwise the oxidising agent may be decomposed before it reacts with the other solids present. The alkali, 25 activated carbon and, where used, the inert powder of high bulk to aid filtration may then be added separately or at the same time, followed finally by the addition of the component to remove the sequestering agent. - 0 Suitable oxidising agents may be inorganic or organic and may include permanganate, perchromate, persulphate, perphosphate, perborate or percarbonate, benzyl or urea peroxide but conveniently hydrogen peroxide is used, usually 30%, preferably in an amount 35 of -20 to 100 ml/1, most preferably 30 to 50 ml/1 of effluent. Alternatively it is sometimes useful to have the oxidant as a solid since this is easier and safer to dose by hand or can also be dispensed by similar automatic means to the other solids in the process. In particular sodium percarbonate is especially useful as it has a high oxygen content and has the .added benefit of reducing the amount of calcium hydroxide required in the step as detailed hereunder, by nature of its being alkaline. The heavy metal ions are removed by the addition of an excess of a metal hydroxide, oxide or carbonate, preferably a Group II metal hydroxide, such as zinc, cadmium, mercury, magnesium or most preferably calcium hydroxide to the resulting precipitate. This alkali may be used in the form of a solution, powder, slurry or as pellets and sufficient must be added to render the effluent alkaline. Generally an amount of from 20g to 90g/litre effluent has been found to be suitable. Addition of an alkaline earth compound also precipitates most of the sulphur compounds as the sulphate and dithionates are converted to their insoluble counterparts for subsequent removal. The activated carbon, in an amount of 15 to 30 g/1 effluent, for removing the colour developing agent and the inert powder for assisting filtration ma.y be added prior to the alkaline addition, coterminously or subsequently but conveniently all three reagents may be added simultaneously. The inert powder may be aluminium hydroxide, a diatomaceous earth such as kieselguhr or even wet sawdust, preferably in the range from 10 to 100 g/1 effluent, most preferably 25 to 35 g/litre. The sequestering agent such as EDTA or propylene diamine tetraacetic acid (PDTA) may be removed by the subsequent addition of an ion-exchange resin, such as Zetolit TM FFip, preferably in an amount of 75 to 125 g/litre effluent which also reduces the pH by partial removal of hydroxide ions. Alternatively and preferably the salt of a Group III or transition metal such as aluminium sulphate may be added, as disclosed in co-pending U.K. application No. 9019606. , filed on even date herewith, in which the metal complex is precipitated from alkaline solution whilst restoring the effluent to a more neutral pH without the addition of extra acid. The precipitate can then be removed by some mechanical means such as filtering, settling or centrifugation to provide an aqueous phase which is considerably more environmentally acceptable and a solid waste which is readily disposable. The invention will now be illustrated with reference to the following Example which does not in any way limit the scope of the invention. Example 1 Sequential Precipitation A model processor effluent was made by combining 300ml of the following developer/amplifier with 500ml of a bleach—fix, also described below: Developer/Amplifier: potassium carbonate 20g diethylhydroxylamine 5g ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) lg Colour developer CD3 Ag 30% hydrogen peroxide 5g water to 1 litre pH adjusted to 10.3 with sulphuric acid or NaOH Bleach Fix : sodium iron (III) EDTA 20g sodium thiosulphate 50g sodium sulphite 20g acetic acid 20ml water to 1 litre pH adjusted to 5.5 with acetic acid 0.8g of silver chloride was added to this mixture and this was stirred until it had dissolved. The mixture was left to stand overnight to allow most reactions to complete. 100ml of this model effluent were poured into a 250ml beaker. To this was added Ami of hydrogen peroxide to reduce the oxygen demand of the mixture by converting the reducing sulphur compounds to their oxidised form. This mixture was stirred for two minutes to allow the reactions to complete. 2.8g of calcium hydroxide were then added to the mixture to precipitate the iron and most of the oxidised sulphur compounds. Following this, 2g of activated charcoal was added to remove colour developing agents and their derivatives, and also the diethylhydroxylamine. After one minute stirring, lOg of Zerolit TM FFip ion—exchange resin was added to remove the sequestering agent, EDTA, and also to reduce the pH by partial removal of hydroxide ions. The mixture was filtered by standard means using fast filter paper and the filtrate was analyzed. All additions were carried out at room temperature with no deliberate temperature or pressure control. Table 1 gives the concentrations of components before and after treatment. Component Concentration Concentration before treatment after treatment Iron 1875±300ppm <2±2ppm EDTA 9375±500ppm <10O±100ppm Colour Developer (CD-) 1100±50ppm <10±10ppm Chemical Oxygen Demand 10±2g/litre <l±lg/litre Silver 713±10ppm 2±lppm TABLE 1 Table 1 shows that all the pollutants measured are removed to an extent that they cannot reliably be detected by the analytical methods employed. Example 2 The above process was repeated using, however, as oxidising agent Ag sodium percarbonate instead of the Ami hydrogen peroxide, thereby reducing to 1.5 g the amount of calcium hydroxide required to precipitate the iron and most of the oxidised sulphur compounds. The concentrations of components after treatment were again as given in Table 1.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method of treating photographic effluent by precipitating or otherwise removing harmful pollutants to provide an environmentally acceptable liquid phase and a disposable solid phase. -' 2. A method as claimed in claim 1, comprising the separation into the liquid and solid phase by differential precipitation, adsorption or otherwise removal of the pollutants through sequential addition of chemical reagents. - • -* 3. A method as claimed in claim 2, in which the differential precipitation is carried out in a single vessel. A. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which more than one precipitant may • * ■ -' be added simultaneously. • 5. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which an oxidising agent is first added to reduce the chemical oxygen demand. 6. A method as claimed in claim 5, in which the ~~ oxidising agent is hydrogen peroxide. 7. A method as claimed in claim 5, in which the oxidising agent is sodium percarbonate. 8. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which heavy metal ions are removed ■ " by the addition of an excess of a metal hydroxide, oxide or carbonate. 9. A method as claimed in claim 8, in which a Group II metal hydroxide, such as calcium hydroxide, is used. -* • - 10. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which colour developing agent is removed by adsorption with activated carbon. 11. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which the sequestering agent is 4 - - > removed by the addition of an ion—exchange resin. 12. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which the solid phase is removed by filtering, settling or centrifugation.

Inventors: FYSON JOHN RICHARD, FYSON, JOHN, RICHARD
Applicants: EASTMAN KODAK CO, KODAK LTD, EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, KODAK LIMITED
Application year: 1991
Main classification: C02F1
IPC codes: C02F1, C02F9, G03C5