Method of detecting a deflated tyre on a vehicle

Abstract: A method of detecting a partially deflated pneumatic tyre on a vehicle having four tyres each mounted on a wheel comprising sensing the angular velocity of each wheel by providing for each wheel, a signal generator to provide a single signal or pulse for each turn of the wheel, characterised by selecting a first wheel and measuring the time for one rotation of that first wheel, after beginning said first measurement similarly measuring the times of rotation for each other wheel, storing the times for each of the wheels for at least three rotations of each wheel and averaging the times to produce an average angular velocity value for each wheel, processing the four signals in a processor unit which subtracts the sum of the signals from one pair of diagonally opposite wheels from the sum of the signals from the other pair of diagonally opposite wheels, sensing when the magnitude of the result is between 0.05% and 0.60% of the mean of the two sums and when it is operating a warning device to indicate a tyre is partially or completely deflated. The method may also compare the signal of each wheel in turn to the average of all four to determine which wheel is deflated.

Description: This invention relates to a method of detecting a deflated tyre on a vehicle suitable for cars, trucks or the like and is an improvement to some aspects of the system disclosed in EP-A-0 291 217. EP-A-0 291 217 is primarily aimed at vehicles having electronic anti-lock braking systems. Such electronic ABS systems have wheel speed signal generators which provide a multi-pulse signal usually of 48 or 96 pulses per revolution of each wheel, and the system described provides an add-on system for such a vehicle. It provides a deflation warning system having similar reliability to the ABS equipment and yet does not need additional wheel sensors or cabling because it can operate within the computer of the ABS equipment itself. Thus whilst the system is effective and of low added cost to a vehicle already equipped with ABS, it is not economically viable on vehicles not so equipped. An object of the present invention is to provide a deflation warning system utilising simple wheel speed sensors. This objective is acheived by the method set out in claim 1. Further aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of some embodiments in conjunction with the attached diagrammatic drawings in which:- Figure.1. is a block diagram showing the method of calculation comparing the full speeds. Fig.2 is a diagram showing the relative positions in time of each wheel and the pulses timed thereof. The apparatus fitted to the vehicle is basically a pulse generator associated with each wheel comprising in the simplest embodiment a single magnet attached to each wheel for rotation therewith and attached to the vehicle suspension a stationary pickup such that a single pulse is obtained each time the wheel rotates. An alternative pick-up is the multi tooth digital signal producing system used at each wheel used for an electronic anti-skid system commonly known as electronic ABS. In this latter case, the pick-up may be additionally connected to the ABS system and the same digital signal used as is used by the ABS system. The signals from each wheel are carried through cables to the inputs of a central processing unit which is basically a computer and may in fact be the same computer as the ABS equipment where it is fitted. Four separate indicator lights are provided one for each wheel and these are most conveniently mounted on the vehicle dashboard. The central processing unit monitors the various signals and compares them to determine whether or not it should give an outward signal to indicate that any tyre on the vehicle is deflated. The method of calculation will now be explained with reference to Figure 2. Firstly it should be understood that when the vehicle begins to move the four signal pulses one for each wheel, will occur in a random manner according to where the wheels were left when the vehicle stopped. Thus the first pulse to be received could come from any of the four wheels. For the sake of this explanation however, it will be assumed that wheel one is the first one to give an output pulse and indeed that the wheels 2, 3 and 4 will follow in the order 2,4,3 with their first pulse. In the computer a timer running at a fixed frequency of 62.5 kilocycles per second is running and when the first pulse comes from wheel 1 the time is noted. The times of the next 15 following pulses are also noted for that wheel giving 16 times in all. Immediately after the first pulse from wheel 1 the time of the next pulse from wheel 2 is noted followed by 15 further times for wheel 2. The same occurs for wheels 3 and 4 so that for each wheel 16 times have been recorded against the same clock. Immediately the last wheel to first signal its movement has completed its sixteenth time the calculation of the signals begins. Firstly for each wheel 15 successive times of rotation are calculated and these are then grouped into three groups of five each of which is averaged so that three times result each of which is averaged over five turns which reduces noise in the system. Interpolation is then used to estimate the angular velocity of wheels 1, 2 and 3 at the instant when wheel 4 gave its first signal. The angular velocity of wheel 4 at that time is also calculated. Thus the angular velocities of all four wheels at the same instant are found. The processing unit also calculates lateral and longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle by comparing the angular velocity signals for the wheels on each side of the vehicle and then comparing the signals from the front and rear pairs of wheels with the forward speed calculated from the mean of the angular velocities of all four wheels. The lateral and longitudinal acceleration figures are compared with a predetermined value for the vehicle concerned. In the case of longitudinal acceleration an acceleration greater than .03g causes inhibition of deflation warning calculation. In the case of lateral acceleration this occurs for figures greater than 0.06g averaged over 5 turns of the wheels. This is to avoid false deflation warning signals due to weight transfer causing rolling radii of the tyres to vary. The system then calculates an error signal dT by comparing the angular velocities of the wheels according to the formula where: T14 = T1 + T4 and T23 = T2 + T3 & T1, T2, T3 and T4 are the interpolated times, at the same instant, for 5 revolutions of the wheels 1, 2 3, 4, respectively. (1 is the left front, 2 the right front, 3 the left rear and 4 the right rear wheels). It is of course to be understood that said times are directly proportional to the angular velocities of the wheels. This dT signal is monitored and the processing unit prepares to sense a deflation if the signal is greater than .05% and less than .6%. In fact the existence of a puncture is then known and the next step is to find which tyre is punctured. The monitor unit looks at the difference between each wheel angular velocity in turn and the average speed of the four wheels and if the difference between any one wheel and the average is more than .1% a second signal is generated. If both dT and the difference signals exist in the ranges mentioned, then a deflation is sensed and the wheel concerned is determined and an output deflation signal is given by the monitoring system. This signal is used to light an indicator on the dash board of the vehicle and this indicator comprises 4 lights to show which wheel is deflated according to the difference signal between each wheel and the average. As a safety guard against spurious signals the warning signal is preferably delayed until three consecutive warning results have been obtained in the processing unit. Each successive detection calculation of the processing unit occurs after 15 turns of the first wheel being considered.Following the sixteenth time for the last of the wheels being watched there is a short time for computation and comparison of results and immediately following that, a further detection sequence is initiated. Thus the sensitivity of the system with the filtering for 3 consecutive warning signals is slightly more than 45 turns of the wheels on a vehicle which means that the system has an operating time at most vehicle speeds of only a few seconds. Most importantly the system works at very low vehicle speeds and indeed a puncture occurring overnight when the vehicle is stationary, is sensed as soon as the vehicle has covered 50 turns of its wheels as a maximum. To fully allow for tyre and vehicle characteristics it is necessary to trigger manually or otherwise a calibration initiating signal. This is done after changing one or more of the tyres on the vehicle and may in some circumstances be necessary after reinflation although this is not usual. In some cases, where tyres have substantial growth at high speed it may be necessary to calibrate the system at two or more different speeds to allow for tyre growth. This is not necessary when the tyres on the vehicle are all the same construction but in the event of tyres having different constructions being fitted to the vehicle different growths at high speed may cause rolling radii to move out of acceptable tolerances and cause false signals. The system can be programmed to calibrate at different speeds to allow for this and in that case initiation after changing a tyre will satisfactorily correct and insert the necessary constants for the system to operate at all speeds. The wheel speed signals may conveniently be achieved by using a single pulse generating system comprising a magnet rotating with the wheel and a pick up adjacent to it but mounted on the brake or suspension. This gives a single pulse per revolution. It is only one example of single pulse generators of this type and many others are known any of which can be utilised for the invention. Similarly the more normal multi pulse signal generator used for anti skid braking systems braking control systems of the electronic type can be used and in that case the intermediate pulses are omitted in the processing unit so that only one signal per revolution is used. In the latter case of multi pulse signal generators an improved response time can be achieved by using a system to select the pulse counted according to the other wheels. Thus, where a first pulse on wheel 1 is timed for the first of the 15 time periods the first following pulse on each of the other wheels can be taken for the first times for each of the other three wheels. Thus the first times for each of the four wheels are very close to one another and the highest operating speed of the deflation warning system is achieved. The embodiment described above uses a continuously running clock of 62.5 kilocycles and notes the times at each signal for each wheel. Obviously there are many variations in this including using a separate clock for each wheel, switching the clock on at the first pulse and switching it off and noting the time period to simplify calculation and indeed varying the speed of the clock according to the speed of the vehicle to allow easier computation and avoid the high numbers necessary to be stored at higher vehicle speeds. Whilst the above description relates to sensing a puncture in the shortest possible time, it is also possible using the principles of this invention to monitor over a long time. This gives a possibility of detecting a smaller pressure loss. For example a long monitor period over 50 successive calculations allows determination of pressure loss in one tyre of 0.2 bar whereas the above described short term monitoring system gives pressure sensitivities of the order of 0.5 bar.

Claims: A method of detecting a partially deflated pneumatic tyre on a vehicle having four tyres each mounted on a wheel comprising sensing a value corresponding to the angular velocity of each wheel by providing for each wheel, a signal generator to provide a single signal or pulse for each turn of the wheel, selecting a first wheel and measuring the time for one rotation of that first wheel, after beginning said first measurement similarly measuring the times of rotation for each other wheel, storing the times for each of the wheels for at least three rotations of each wheel and averaging the times to produce an average angular velocity value for each wheel, storing at least 3 successive average angular velocity values for each wheel and calculating by interpolation the angular velocity value of each wheel at a chosen time so that the angular velocity values of all wheels are known for the same time processing the four interpolated values in a processor unit which subtracts the sum of the interpolated values from one pair of diagonally opposite wheels from the sum of the interpolated values from the other pair of diagonally opposite wheels, sensing when the magnitude of the result is between 0.05% and 0.60% of the mean of the two sums and when it is, operating a warning device to indicate a tyre is partially or completely deflated. A method according to claim 1, characterised in that the processor unit also compares the values for each of wheels in turn with the signals for each of the other wheels, senses when one of the said values is different to the average of all four values by more than 0.1% and in the event of this signal and the magnitude of the result being both in said ranges operating the warning device. A method according to claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the times are each measured against a standard clock frequency. A method according to claim 1, 2 or 3, characterised in that there is a separate clock for each wheel. A method according to claim 3 or 4, characterised in that the clock is started at the first pulse for the wheel concerned. A method according to claim 3 or 4, characterised in that the clock runs continuously and the time is taken each time a signal occurs. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that the single signal is derived from a multi signal generator by ignoring intermediate signals between two successive signals from a pre-selected single signal generating segment. A method according to claim 7, characterised in that the time of rotation for the first wheel is begun from a first pulse and the times of rotation for each other wheel are begun from the pulse for the respective wheel following said first pulse. A method according to any of claims 1 to 8, characterised in that 15 rotations of each wheel are taken, each set of 15 rotations is divided into three groups of 5 rotations each and the values corresponding to the angular velocities of all four wheels are computed by interpolation to give the speeds at a predetermined time. A method according to claim 9, characterised in that the interpolation is for the speeds at the start of timing of the fourth wheel to be timed. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 10, characterised by the processing unit repeating the two sensing operations and operating the warning device when at least two successive results each give an indication of a tyre subject to pressure loss. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 11, characterised by the processing unit also monitoring lateral acceleration signals for the vehicle and inhibiting the warning signal for vehicle lateral accelerations greater than a predetermined value averaged over at least 5 turns of each wheel. A method according to claim 12, characterised in that the value is 0.06g. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, characterised by the processing unit itself calculating the lateral acceleration by comparison of the values corresponding to the angular velocity from side to side of the vehicle and the vehicle forward speed calculated from the mean of the angular velocities. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 14, characterised by the processing unit calculating the acceleration and deceleration of the vehicle in its direction of travel by monitoring the rate of change of the sum of the values corresponding to the angular velocity of all four wheels with relation to time and inhibiting the pressure loss of warning system if the vehicle acceleration or deceleration exceeds a predetermined value. A method according to claim 15, characterised in that the predetermined value is 0.03g. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 16, characterised in that the clock rate is changed at different vehicle speeds. A method of any one of claims 1 to 17, characterised by the processing unit, following receipt of a calibrate signal, measuring the values corresponding to the angular velocities of all four wheels, determines calculation constants to allow for the rolling radius of each tyre at the time of calibration and subsequently using said constants. A method according to claim 18, characterised by the calculation of constants being repeated at at least one higher speed to provide secondary constants allowing for changing in rolling radius of the vehicle tyres at said speeds.

Inventors: REHAL LAVINDER SINGH, WALKER JOHN CHARLES, REHAL, LAVINDER SINGH, WALKER, JOHN CHARLES
Applicants: SUMITOMO RUBBER IND, SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Application year: 1991
Main classification: B60C23
IPC codes: G01L17, B60C23, G01D7