Method and apparatus for assuring safe work

Abstract: A safe work assuring method in which only when absence of workers in work space (X) where the workers work in cooperation with a machine, is detected and a work enable signal (Pe) having a logical value of 1 corresponding to a high energy status is generated, and generation of work executing energy on the machine side for the work space is permitted, thereby assuring safe environments for workers.

Description: Background of the Invention (1) Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for assuring safety of a worker in a work space in accordance with the precharacterizing parts of the claims 1 and 4, respectively. (2) Description of the Related Art For works involving a working system which permits the movable section of a machine and men to work cooperatively, gas facilities which are accompanied by explosion and other similar facilities, it is extremely important to keep safety measures for workers. When men and machines alternately work in common work space, accidents may occur when the movable section of a machine collides or hits against part of a worker's body and energy the machine has is transmitted to the worker's body. For example, in the case where a man carries work in the work space and a robot processes it, an accident is likely to occur when the arm of the robot hits against part of the man's body. A typical conventional safety assuring system for use in such a working system is designed in such a way that an optical signal from an optical radar sensor is emanated onto the working area of the movable section of a machine, and any work involving the movable section of the machine will be stopped when the optical signal is reflected by a worker and received by the sensor, which indicates the presence of a dangerous environment. That is, the conventional safety assuring system is realized based on the concept that work on the machine side should be terminated upon detection of a dangerous condition or environment (man or men present in the work space). With the use of such a conventional safety system, however, when the signal-emitting section of the optical radar sensor fails for some reasons and the optical signal is not sent to the working area, the optical signal will not be received even if a worker or workers are in the working area of the movable section of a machine. In this case there involves a problem that erroneous discrimination that no workers are present is made, so that the work of the machine's movable section continues, resulting in dangerously erroneous status. In other words, there are some situations the conventional safety system cannot cope with to provide safe work environments for workers. AU-B-509 999 describes a known electrical safety guarding equipment, wherein the presence of a worker by an optical detection apparatus and the operation of a machine-control apparatus is controlled on the basis of the detection result; whether the operation of said detection apparatus is normal or not is monitored by a monitoring apparatus, and the energization of the machine control apparatus is stopped, when the detection apparatus fails. This prior art document fails to disclose a calculation of a logical product of an output of the monitoring apparatus indicative of the normal status of the optical sensor and work-enable signal. Further, the above document does not mention to consider the fail safe of a logical product calculating element. US-A-3,805,085 discloses a technique to enable a machinery operation by optically detecting that a worker (e.g. his hands) is present in a safe area. However, according to this prior art technique, when the beam of the optical sensor is interrupted by the worker's hand, it is judged that the worker is in safe status and the machinery is operated. That is, when the optical sensor does not receive the optical beam, e.g. when the optical beam is accidentally interrupted, the safe status of the worker is indicated. Also, if the optical beam is not detected due to failure of the optical sensor, there is a possibility that the worker is judged to be in the safe status and thereupon the machinery operation is erroneously enabled. US-A-3,742,222 discloses a system utilizing multiple light beams and multiple light sensors for establishing an area of light to detect the presence of an object blocking one or more beams in the area. A relay is energized by a logical product output of the detected outputs of the optical sensors and the machinery operation is controlled by an output of a DC-circuit consisting of a contact of the relay and a manual switch. However, the fail-safe characteristic of the AND circuit used for providing the logical product is not disclosed. Further, the fail-safe characteristic of the DC-circuit consisting of the contact and the manual switch is not disclosed. Summary of the Invention It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for surely assuring safe works. To achieve the above object, a safe work assuring method for assuring safety of a worker in a work space where the worker works in cooperation with a machine wherein a safe status of the worker is detected by a sensor and a work executing energy is generated for the work space on a machine side is characterized by the steps of: detecting a safe status of the worker by receiving an AC input signal at a high level; detecting a dangerous status of the worker by receiving the AC input signal at a low level including zero; generating an output signal at a logical "1", indicative of the safe status and corresponding to a high energy status, upon reception of the AC input signal at the high level; generating said output signal at a logical "0", indicative of the dangerous status and corresponding to a low energy status, upon reception of the AC input signal at the low level including zero; discriminating the safe and the dangerous status of the worker by using the sensor so that an output signal of the sensor is extinguished when the sensor fails, and a logical "0" is indicated, irrespective of the level of the AC input signal received thereby; calculating a logical product of the sensor's output signal, wherein a logical "1" is indicative of a safe status of the sensor, and a work enable signal of a logical "1" on the machine side, by using a logical product element having a logical output signal which cannot erroneously come to a logical "1"; and generating the work executing energy for the operation of the machine in the work space on the basis of the calculated logical product (claim 1). Advantageous developments of this method are specified by each of the depending claims 2 and 3. Since the present method is designed such that work executing energy on the machine side for the work space is generated only when the work enable signal of a logical "1" corresponding to the high energy status is issued, the work enable signal for the high energy status will not be generated even when a sensor for detecting safety fails. In this way collision of a machine with men can be prevented, thus surely assuring safe work environments. The work enable signal may be generated only when the sensor detects a safe status in which no workers are present in the work space or when the sensor detects a safe status in which a worker is in a safe space other than the work space. Furthermore, the method may be modified in such a way that given that information representing a safe status and a dangerous status are expressed respectively by binary logical values of "1" and "0", an energy status received by the sensor and safety information to be sent based on the energy status coincide with each other as a logical "1". This will result in further improvement of the fail-safe. A safe work assuring apparatus for assuring safety of a worker in a work space where the worker works in cooperation with a machine wherein a safe status of the worker is detected by a sensor and a work execution energy is generated for the work space on a machine side when a sensor output signal indicative of a safe status of the worker is generated from the sensor is characterized in that said sensor is adapted for detecting the safe status of the worker by receiving an AC input signal at a high level and for detecting a dangerous status of the worker by receiving the AC input signal at a low level including zero means, amplifying and rectifying an AC signal based on the AC input signal, generating a rectified output signal indicative of the safe status as a logical "1" upon reception of the AC input signal at the high level, generating the rectified output signal indicative of the dangerous status as a logical "0" upon reception of the AC input signal at the low level including zero, and rendering the rectified output signal to a logical "0" when the sensor fails; and a logical product element having two input signals, in which the rectified output signal of the sensor is one input signal, a work enabling signal on the machine is the other input signal and the rectified output signal come to a logical "0" when the logical product element fails, an output signal of the logical product element being a drive signal for generating work executing energy for a movable section of the machine (claim 4). Depending claims 5 to 9 each specify advantageous developments thereof. With this arrangement, the sensor generates a work enable signal of a logical "1" corresponding to a high energy status when detecting the safety of a worker in the work space, and the logical product element sends a drive signal for the movable section of the machine to the machine side as its output signal for generation of this work executing energy only upon generation of this work enable signal. When the sensor fails, therefore, the sensor output represents a low energy status so that the movable section of the machine will not be driven, thus assuring safe work environments. The sensor may be designed to detect the safe status upon reception of a logical value of 1 corresponding to the high energy status and output the work enable signal without a negation circuit. Even if the sensor fails, the sensor is prevented from producing an output of a logical "1" corresponding to the high energy status. The logical product element may be designed to produce an output only when an input signal of a higher level than that of a power supply voltage is applied to two input terminals of the logical product element. This can provide such a fail-safe measure that the logical product element will not generate an output of a logical "1" corresponding to the high energy status whatever failure occurs in the logical product element, thus ensuring higher safety. Brief Description of the Drawinss Fig. 1 is a diagram illustrating a model of a man/machine working system to which the present invention is applied; Fig. 2, is a diagram showing a system structure that can ensure safety in the working system; Fig. 3 is a model diagram exemplifying how to realise a safety system according to the present invention; Fig. 4 is a diagram for explaining the structure of a sensor which cannot be employed in the present invention; Fig. 5 is a diagram of the basic structure of a proper sensor for use in the present invention; Fig. 6 is a circuit diagram of a logical product calculating circuit illustrating one embodiment of a logical product element of Fig. 3; Fig. 7 is a diagram showing the structure of one embodiment of a fail-safe sensor; Fig. 8 is a diagram depicting the structure of another embodiment of the fail-safe sensor; Fig. 9 is a diagram illustrating the structure of a further embodiment of the fail-safe sensor; and Fig. 10 is a circuit diagram illustrating an embodiment of an amplifying circuit and a rectifying circuit to make the sensor fail-safe. Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment A method and an apparatus for assuring safe work according to the present invention will be understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment. The embodiment will be explained with reference to a man/machine working system in the case where men and machines alternately work in common work space. Fig. 1 shows a model of the man/machine working system according to this embodiment. "Work space" means the space where men (workers) and a movable section of a machine, such as the arm of a robot, alternately work; for example, worker carry work in this space and the machine processes it. "Machine space" and "man space" mean safe space, i.e., space where the movable section of the machine will not collide against the workers or is kept by a safe distance away from the latter. To prevent collision between men and the machine's movable section, the above man/machine working system should be so designed that men enter the work space while at least the machine's movable section is out of the space, or vice versa. Fig. 2 illustrates a model of this safe work assuring system. Mx, Po, Hx, and Ho are binary logical variables. Mx indicates an intention that the movable section of a machine in the machine space will move to the work space in response to a command ("1" for the presence of the intention and "0" for no intention). Po represents work executing energy of the machine's movable section in the work space ("1" for energy present and "0" for no energy). Hx indicates an intention that men in the man space will move to the work space ("1" for the presence of the intention and "0" for no intention), and Ho work executing energy of men in the work space ("1" for energy present and "0" for no energy). For a man to enter the work space and begin working (Ho = 1), a sensor Sh should detect that the machine's movable section is not working in the work space, then a work enable signal (logical value of 1) from the sensor Sh is compared with the work intention of the man, Hx = 1, by means of a logical product element Gh, and the human intention Hx = 1 is output as Ho = 1. In this case, the sensor Sh is the eyes of the man, and the logical product element Gh is the man's brain. For the machine's movable section to move in the work space to do the required work (Po = 1), a sensor Sm should detect that nobody is working in the work space, then a work enable signal Pe(Pe = 1) from the sensor Sm is compared with the intention of the machine's movable section, Mx = 1, by a logical product element Gm, and the intention of the machine's movable section Mx = 1 is output as Po = 1. The intention Mx of the movable section of the machine means, for example, a work command issued from a controller provided on the machine side. Suppose that men will not risk themselves if they know that the work is actually dangerous. To ensure safe work environments, it is inevitable that the movable sections of machines are designed to execute their own work only when men are not working in the work space, i.e., only when the work enable signal (logical value of 1) is sent from the sensor Sm. In other words, the structure shown in Fig. 3 is necessary to realize a safe working system which can assure the safe work environments. In Fig. 3, the work enable signal Pe is determined based on received information of safety in the work space; Pe = 1 (energy present) when safe or nobody is in the work space, and Pe = 0 (no energy) when it is dangerous to work or when men are in the work space. How to design a sensor for the safe working system shown in Fig. 3 will be described below referring to Figs. 4 and 5. Suppose that information indicating safety (safety information) is represented by a binary logical variable S, and that "S = 1" means a safe status and "S = 0" a dangerous status. In Fig. 4, S is the negation of the logical variable S that indicates the safe status ( S = 1 indicates a dangerous status with energy present, while S = 0 means a safe status with no energy). A sensor S m1 and a negation circuit N constitute the sensor Sm in Fig. 3. With the above-described structure, the sensor S m1 detects the dangerous status ( S = 1), and the detection resultant ( S ′ = 1) is negated by the negation circuit N. Based on the negation result (S = 1), an output signal, Pe = 0, is generated. If the negation circuit N is normal when the logical value of the input signal to the negation circuit N becomes "0", the work enable signal Pe = 1 indicating the safe status is output. This signal output is also generated when a line ℓ that connects the sensor S m1 to the negation circuit N is disconnected. Specifically speaking, according to the sensor structure shown in Fig. 4, the work enable signal Pe = 1 indicating the safe status may erroneously be produced if a failure occurs on the input side of the negation circuit N fails. Referring to Fig. 5, a sensor S m2 detects information of the result of negating the dangerous status S in the negation circuit N, and outputs the work enable signal Pe as the detection result. The sensor S m2 corresponds to the sensor Sm in Fig. 3. The sensor S m2 detecting the negation of the dangerous status S means the direct detection of the safe status (S = 1) by the sensor S m2 . In this case, if the sensor S m2 is designed to always output the signal Pe = 0 when it malfunctions (i.e., the sensor S m2 is designed fail-safe), the work enable signal Pe will be Pe = 0 when a failure occurs on the input side of the sensor S m2 and the work enable signal Pe to permit the machine's movable section to do its work will not erroneously be Pe = 1 as shown in Fig. 4. Provided that the sensor S m1 is designed fail-safe in Fig. 4, if the sensor S m1 fails and erroneously gives an output S ' = 0, the work enable signal Pe = 1 will be output regardless of the input signal S to the sensor. In other words, in the safe work assuring system in Fig. 3, the sensor Sm needs to directly detect the safe status (S = 1), the sensor Sm must not erroneously output Pe = 1, and the logical product element Gm must not erroneously output Po = 1. Referring to Fig. 3, the logical variable S indicating the safety information, the work enable signal Pe and the output signal Po should have such a relationship (unate logical relationship) that at least the logical value will not erroneously become "1". On the other hand, the intention on the machine side, Mx, is allowed to erroneously become "1" if the logical product element Gm has such a characteristic that it will never transfer Mx = 1 as Po = 1 even when malfunctioning. That is, provided that the work space in which the safety should be secured is in the safe status (S = 1), even if Mx = 1 is erroneously generated, resulting in the output Po = 1, there will occur no real damage; at least no accidents will occur. As described above, with the work enable signal Pe = 0 (the work space is not safe), even when the logical product element Gm malfunctions, to have this particular characteristic, the two-input logical product element Gm should at least be designed never to output Po = 1 by a single input signal. In this respect, a C-MOS type two-input logical product circuit which is used for ordinary logical operations may produce an output of a logical level corresponding to a high energy status when it fails, or may generate an output signal indicating the high energy status even if only one of its two input signals is available. This type of logical product circuit cannot therefore serve as a logical product element in the safety system shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a logical product calculating circuit that can serve as the logical product element in Fig. 3. Referring to Fig. 6, R1 to R5 denote resistors, Q1 to Q9 transistors, D, D1 and D2 diodes, and C1 and C2 capacitors. Reference characters E is the power supply voltage of the circuit, 1 and 2 represent input terminals, and OUT denotes an output terminal. The operation of this calculating circuit will be briefly described below. When no input voltage is applied to the input terminals 1 and 2, the transistors Q1 and Q5 are in an ON status. When a predetermined voltage is applied to both input terminals 1 and 2, the transistors Q1 to Q7 are repeatedly turned on and off in a specific order to cause oscillation: Q1 OFF → Q2 OFF → Q3 ONE → Q4 OFF → Q5 OFF → Q6 OFF → Q7 ON → Q1 ON → Q2 ON → Q3 OFF → Q4 ON → Q5 ON → Q6 ON → Q7 OFF → ... The oscillation output is transferred via the diode D to the transistors Q8 and Q9 for amplification. The amplified output is sent to a voltage multiplying rectifier, constituted by the capacitors C1 and C2 and diodes D1 and D2, and is superimposed on the power supply voltage E there. The resultant output is sent as a DC output through the output terminal OUT. The oscillation condition of this circuit is such that, with V1 and V2 being respectively input voltages to the input terminals 1 and 2, V1 and V2 should satisfy the following. (E<) R1 + R2 + R3 R3 · E < V1 = V2 < R4 + R5 R5 · E From the above, it is understood that the circuit has a logical product calculating function. In addition, this oscillation circuit has a characteristic that it cannot oscillate when any of the resistors R1-R5 is cut or any of the transistors Q1 - Q9 fails. In other words, the oscillation circuit has a fail-safe characteristic that it will not provide a DC output is no input signals are applied to both of the two input terminal, and will not produce an output in response to the input signal to one of the input terminals alone. The reason to superimpose the amplified output on the power supply voltage E in the rectifying circuit is to provide the input condition to permit the output from the logical product element to oscillate at the subsequent stage when the same logical product elements are cascade-connected. Figs. 7 and 8 illustrate embodiments of the sensor for detecting safety information. Fig. 7 shows an embodiment of the sensor in the case of directly monitoring the status of space (work space) the safety in which should be secured. Referring to this diagram, the sensor comprises a light-emitting unit 13, a light-receiving unit 16 and a rectifying circuit 17. The light-emitting unit 13, including an oscillator 11 and a light-emitting element 12, emanates an AC light beam into the work space X the safety in which should be assured. The light-receiving unit 16, including a light-receiving element 14 and an AC amplifier 15, receives the light beam from the light-emitting unit 13 and produces an output. The rectifying circuit 17 rectifies the AC output from the light-receiving unit 16 and produces a DC output signal Pe. With the above sensor structure, when an obstruction, such as a worker, is present in the work space X, the light beam from the light-emitting unit 13 is shielded by the worker and will not reach the light-receiving unit 16, rendering the output signal Pe = 0. When the worker is not in the work space X, the light beam from the light-emitting unit 13 will reach the light-receiving unit 16, providing the output signal Pe = 1. In contrast to the above embodiment in Fig. 7 for directly monitoring the status in the work space X the safety in which should be secured, the embodiment shown in Fig. 8 is designed for the case of detecting if any man returns to the man space Y or indirectly monitoring the work space X. Like reference numerals as used in Fig. 7 are used to denote corresponding or identical elements in Fig. 8 to avoid their otherwise redundant description. In this case, when no worker is in the man space Y, the light beam from the light-emitting unit 13 will not be reflected by the worker and will not reach the light-receiving unit 16, providing the output signal Pe = 0. When a worker is in the man space Y, the light beam from the light-emitting unit 13 will be reflected by the worker, reaching the light-receiving unit 16, and the signal Pe = 1 will be output. In short, the safe status (S = 1) means no workers present in the work space X the safety in which should be assured according to the sensor structure shown in Fig. 7, while the safe status (S = 1) means a worker present in the man space Y according to the sensor structure in Fig. 8. In either case, the light beam to be received at the light-receiving element 14 will be received when in the safe status (S = 1) and will become a high energy status. If the sensor having the radar structure shown in Fig. 8 is used in the safety information detecting method shown in Fig. 7, when no workers are present in the work space X or it is in the safe status (S = 1), the light beam from the light-emitting unit 13 will not reach the light-receiving unit 16 and no energy will be received there. If the sensor having the light-penetration structure shown in Fig. 7 is used in the safety information detecting method shown in Fig. 8, on the other hand, when a worker is present in the man space Y or it is in the safe status (S = 1), the light beam from the light-emitting unit 13 will not reach the light-receiving unit 16 and no energy will be received there. In both cases, to provide the work enable signal Pe = 1, a negation circuit is required on the output side of the sensor. The resultant sensor structure is the same as is shown in Fig. 4, which generates the work enable signal Pe = 1 even when the sensor fails to emit light, so that the sensor may dangerously considers the event as a safe status. From the above, in order to constitute a sensor for detecting safety information, the safety information (S = 1 for the safe status and S = 0 for the dangerous status) should coincide with the status of the received energy of the sensor, and it is necessary to use a sensor that detects the safe status in terms of the high energy status. This is apparent from the sensor shown in Fig. 9. The sensor in Fig. 9 is effective in a safety system which cuts off the power supply when the current erroneously flows to the motor to drive the robot's movable section, while the robot maintenance is being conducted by workers in the vicinity of the movable section in a hold status of the robot (status in which the movable section is stopped with power on). The sensor includes an oscillator 21, a resistor R, a saturable magnetic core 22, an amplifier 23, a rectifying circuit 24 and a power line 25 for a motor (not shown) for driving the movable section of a machine. The oscillator 21 generates an AC output. The magnetic core 22 has a primary winding T1 and a secondary winding T2 wound around. The primary winding T1 is connected through the resistor R to the oscillator 21. The secondary winding T2 receives an AC signal running through the primary winding T1. The amplifier 23 amplifies the output of the secondary winding T2. The rectifying circuit 24 rectifies an AC output signal from the amplifier 23. The power lines 25, wound around the magnetic core 22, carries a current I to the motor. In the sensor with the above structure, when the current I is not flowing through the power line 25, the AC signal from the primary winding T1 is received at the secondary winding T2 to generate the output signal Pe. In case that the current I erroneously flows through the power line 25, the magnetic core 22 will become saturated so that the AC signal from the primary winding T1 will not be sent to the secondary winding T2. In other words, in the safe status (S = 1) in which no motor current flows, the input energy to the secondary winding T2 is high, providing the enable signal Pe = 1, while in the dangerous status (S = 0) where the motor current erroneously flows to be likely to move the movable section, there will be no energy, providing the enable signal Pe = 0. Besides the above-described sensor which detects safety information depending on whether or not externally-applied energy is present, there is a direct-acting type sensor which directly detects the energy of a detection target, such as a solar battery, a microphone for extracting noise, or a temperature sensor. Suppose an infrared sensor, one of the direct-acting type sensors, which detects infrared rays irradiated from a human body, is used as the sensor in Fig. 7 or 8. Then, according to the system in Fig. 7 which considers no workers present as the safe status, it is safe when there is no received energy. To represent the safe status by a logical value of 1, a negation circuit is required. Therefore, such a sensor is effective in safety system in Fig. 8 that indirectly monitors space the safety in which should be secured, but cannot be applied to the safety system in Fig. 7 that directly monitors the space. One way to design these sensors fail-safe is to generate an AC signal on the sender side and amplify the AC signal on the receiver side. Fig. 10 illustrates an embodiment of an amplifying circuit and a rectifying circuit on the receiver side in this case. Referring to Fig. 10, C3 to C5 denote capacitors, R6 and R7 resistors, D3 and D4 diodes, and Q10 a transistor. The resistors R6 and R7 and the transistor Q10 constitute an emitter-grounded AC amplifier. The capacitors C3-C5 and the diodes D3 and D4 constitutes a voltage multiplying rectifier. Reference character E is the power supply voltage for the AC amplifier, and reference character a is the output voltage of the rectifying circuit. The work enable signal Pe = 1 when the output voltage a is present, and Pe = 0 when it is not provided. Sc denotes an AC input signal to be input to the amplifier in the light-receiving unit 16. With the above structure, when the resistor R6 or R7, or transistor Q10 fails due to possible line disconnection or short-circuiting, no AC signal will be produced. The output signal of the amplifier (collector output signal of the transistor Q10) is superimposed on the power supply voltage E by the capacitor C4, a constituent of the rectifying circuit. If any of the electrical elements constituting the circuit shown in Fig. 9 fails, therefore, the output signal a of the rectifying circuit will not be produced when no input signal Sc is applied. That is, this sensor has a fail-safe structure. As described above, according to the present invention, the safety of machine-working space is detected by a sensor, a work enable signal to permit the movable section of a machine to move is generated when the safety is confirmed, and the machine's movable section can move only upon generation of the work enable signal. This system will not therefore issue the work enable signal and inhibits the machine's movable section from moving when the sensor fails, thus ensuring safe working environments, as compared with the conventional system which stops moving the machine's movable section upon detection of the dangerous status, and cannot detect the dangerous status when the sensor fails, which may dangerously move the movable section of the machine.

Claims: A safe work assuring method for assuring safety of a worker in a work space (X) where the worker works in cooperation with a machine wherein a safe status of the worker is detected by a sensor (Sm) and a work executing energy is generated for the work space (X) on a machine side, characterized by the steps of: said sensor detecting a safe status of the worker by receiving an AC input signal at a high level; said sensor detecting a dangerous status of the worker by receiving the AC input signal at a low level including zero; said sensor generating a rectified output signal (Pe) at a logical "1", indicative of the safe status and corresponding to a high energy status, upon reception of the AC input signal at the high level; said sensor generating said rectified output signal (Pe) at a logical "O", indicative of the dangerous status and corresponding to a low energy status, upon reception of the AC input signal at the low level including zero; discriminating the safe and the dangerous status of the worker by using the sensor so that an output signal of the sensor is extinguished when the sensor fails, and a logical "0" is indicated, irrespective of the level of the AC input signal received thereby; calculating a logical product of the sensor's output signal, wherein a logical "1" is indicative of a safe status of the sensor, and a work enable signal (Mx) of a logical "1" on the machine side, by using a logical product element (Gm) having a logical output signal (Po) which cannot erroneously come to a logical "1"; and generating the work executing energy for the operation of the machine in the work space on the basis of the calculated logical product. A safe work assuring method according to claim 1, wherein the sensor generates the sensor's output signal indicative of the safe status as a logical "1", corresponding to the high energy status, only when the sensor detects a status in which no workers are present in the work space. A safe work assuring method according to claim 2, wherein the sensor generates the sensor's output signal indicative of the safe status at the logical "1" corresponding to the high energy status, only when the sensor detects a status in which the worker is present in a safe space other than the work space. A safe work assuring apparatus for assuring safety of a worker in a work space (X) where the worker works in cooperation with a machine wherein a safe status of the worker is detected by a sensor (Sm) and a work execution energy is generated for the work space (X) on a machine side when a sensor's output signal indicative of a safe status of the worker is generated from the sensor, characterized in that said sensor (Sm) is adapted for detecting the safe status of the worker by receiving an AC input signal at a high level and for detecting a dangerous status of the worker by receiving the AC input signal at a low level including zero; that means (15, 17; 23, 24) are provided, amplifying and rectifying an AC signal based on the AC input signal, generating a rectified output signal (Pe) indicative of the safe status as a logical "1" upon reception of the AC input signal at the high level, generating the rectified output signal (Pe) indicative of the dangerous status as a logical "0" upon reception of the AC input signal at the low level including zero, and rendering the rectified output signal (Pe) to a logical "0" when the sensor fails; and a logical product element (Gm) having two input signals (Mx, Pe), in which the rectified output signal (Pe) of the sensor is one input signal, a work enabling signal (Mx) on the machine is the other input signal and the rectified output signal comes to a logical "0" when the logical product element (Gm) fails, an output signal (Po) of the logical product element being a drive signal for generating work executing energy for a movable section of the machine. A safe work assuring apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the sensor includes: a light-emitting unit (13) for emanating a light beam in the work space (X); a light-receiving unit (16) for receiving the light beam from the light-emitting unit (13) when no workers are present in the work space (X), and generating an AC output signal; and a rectifying circuit (17) for superimposing the AC output signal from the light-receiving unit (16) on a power supply voltage, rectifying the superimposed AC output signal and generating a DC output signal (Pe)(Fig. 7). A safe work assuring apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the sensor includes: a light-emitting unit (13) for emanating a light beam in safe space (Y) other than the work space (X); a light-receiving unit (16) for receiving the light beam from the light-emitting unit (13), reflected by a worker, when the worker is in the safe space (Y), and generating an AC output signal; and a rectifying circuit (17) for superimposing the AC output signal from the light-receiving unit (16) on a power supply voltage rectifying the superimposed AC output signal and generating a DC output signal (Pe) (Fig. 8). A safe work assuring apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the sensor includes: a saturable magnetic core (22) having a primary winding (T₁) in which an AC signal is input and a secondary winding (T₂) for receiving the AC signal from the primary winding and generating an output; and a power line (25), wound around the magnetic core, for carrying a drive current (I) for a motor driven by the drive signal to drive the movable section of the machine, whereby, when the drive current (I) does not flow through the power line (25), the magnetic core (22) is not saturated and the AC signal of the primary winding is sent to the secondary winding to provide an output signal of a logical "1" indicative of a safe status at said secondary winding corresponding to a high level status, and when the drive current (I) flows through the power line (25), the magnetic core (22) is saturated and the AC signal of the primary winding (T₁) is not sent to the secondary winding (T₂) to provide an output signal of a logical "0" indicative of a dangerous status at the secondary winding (T₂) corresponding to a low level status (Fig. 9). A safe work assuring apparatus according to claim 4, wherein an output signal is generated by the sensor and superimposed on a power supply voltage, the logical product element produces a high level output signal indicative of a safe status in the work space only when an input signal of a higher level than that of the power supply voltage is applied to two terminals of the logical product element so that the logical product element produces an output indicative of a dangerous status in the work space when the sensor fails. A safe work assuring apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the logical product element comprises: a first transistor (Q7) having a collector connected via a resistor to one of the input terminals (2) of the logical product element, and an emitter connected to a power input terminal (E); a second transistor (Q1) having an emitter connected to the power input terminal (E), a collector grounded via a two series-connected resistors, and a base supplied with a collector voltage of the first transistor (Q7) which is divided by a voltage-dividing resistor (R2, R3) provided between the collector of the first transistor (Q7) and ground; a third transistor (Q2) having a base supplied with a collector voltage of the second transistor (Q1) which is divided by two series-connected resistors, a collector connected via a resistor to the power input terminal (E), and an emitter grounded; a fourth transistor (Q3) having a base supplied with a collector voltage of the third transistor (Q2) which is divided by two resistors connected between the collector of the third transistor (Q2) and ground, a collector connected via two series-connected resistors (R4, R5) to the other input terminal (1), and an emitter grounded; a fifth transistor (Q4) having a base supplied via a resistor with a collector voltage of the fourth transistor (Q3) which is divided by the two resistors (R4, Rn) connected to the collector of the fourth transistor (Q3), a collector connected via a resistor (R1) to the other input terminal (1) in parallel to the collector of the fourth transistor (Q3), and an emitter connected to the power input terminal (E); a sixth transistor (Q5) having a base supplied with a collector voltage of the fifth transistor (Q4) which is divided by two resistors (R2, R3) connected in series between the collector of the fifth transistor (Q4) and ground, an emitter connected to the power input terminal (E), and a collector grounded via two series-connected resistors; and a seventh transistor (Q6) having a base supplied with collector voltage of the sixth transistor (Q5) which is divided by a voltage-dividing resistor connected between the collector of the sixth transistor (Q5) and ground, a collector connected via two series-connected resistors (R4, R5) to the one of the input terminals (2) and an output terminal (OUT), and an emitter grounded, an input voltage to be applied to said one of the input terminals (2), which is voltage-divided by series-connected resistors (R4, R5) connected to the collector of the seventh transistor (Q6), being input via a resistor to the base of the first transistor (Q7) (Fig. 6).

Inventors: FUTSUHARA KOICHI C O THE NIPPO, MUKAIDONO MASAO, SUGIMOTO NOBORU, FUTSUHARA, KOICHI, C/O THE NIPPON SIGNAL CO., LTD., MUKAIDONO, MASAO, SUGIMOTO, NOBORU
Applicants: MUKAIDONO MASAO, NIPPON SIGNAL CO LTD, SUGIMOTO NOBORU, MUKAIDONO, MASAO, SUGIMOTO, NOBORU, THE NIPPON SIGNAL CO. LTD.
Application year: 1991
Main classification: G05B9
IPC codes: F16P3