ANTIDOTING HERBICIDAL 3-ISOXAZOLIDINONE COMPOUNDS

Abstract: This invention embodies compositions comprising herbicidally effective compounds corresponding to formula (I) in which R1 and R2 are independently methyl or ethyl, X is H, methyl, chlorine, bromine, fluorine; Y is chlorine, bromine, fluorine; and n is 0, 1 or 2 and a non-phytotoxic antidotally effective amount of an antidote therefor selected from the group of amides of haloalkanoic acids, including oxazolidines and thiazolidines, aromatic oxime derivatives, thiazole carboxylic acids and derivatives, substituted phenylpyrimidines, 2-(dichloroacetyl)-2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane and 2-(dichloromethyl)-2-thiazoline.

Description: ANTIDOTING HERBICIDAL 3-ISOXAZOLIDINONE COMPOUNDS Field of the Invention This invention pertains to herbicidal compositions and methods of use and more particularly to herbicidal compo¬ sitions comprising 3-isoxazolidinone compounds and antidotes therefor which are useful as herbicides. Background of the Invention Many herbicides injure crop plants at rates neces¬ sary to control weed growth. However, to be effective an herbicide must cause minimal damage, preferably no damage, to the beneficial crop while maximizing damage to weed species which infest the locus of the crop. Herbicides have gained a high degree of commercial success because it has been shown that such compounds can increase crop yield and reduce harvesting costs. Some of these herbicides include types such as triazines, halogenated acetanilides, carbamates, thiolcarbamates, benzoic acid deri¬ vatives, urea derivatives and the like. In some cases, a crop species may be susceptible to the effects of the herbicide. To preserve protection of crop species from herbicide injury along with the concomitant her¬ bicidal effectiveness of weed species, use of chemical com¬ pounds called antidotes or safeners have been employed. See, for example, U.S. Patents 4,021,224 and 4,230,874. SUBSTITUTESHEET Although the effects of antidotes against herbicide injury can be established under field and greenhouse condi¬ tions the physiological and biochemical mechanisms of action have not been established for all compounds. Nevertheless, the use of antidote compounds with herbicides is a widely accepted agronomic practice. These compounds are used on crops including agronomic and vegetable species. The isoxazolidinone compounds have been found to be very effective herbicides with broad general herbicidal acti¬ vity against a wide variety of plant species. Many active 3-isoxazolidinone herbicidal compounds are disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,405,357 which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference. The method of controlling vegetation with the compounds comprises applying an herbicidally effective amount of the isoxazolidinone, usually with an inert carrier, to the area where herbicidal control is desired. The isoxazolidinone compounds have been found in some instances to adversely affect or interfere with the cul¬ ture of a variety of crops. In particular, gramineous crops such as corn are sensitive to the application of effective weed controlling rates. Therefore, the effective use of these herbicides for controlling weeds in the presence of such crops is further enhanced by, or may require in many instances, the addition of an antidotally effective amount of a compound, which is antidotally effective with the isoxazolidinone herbi¬ cide. It is the objective of this invention to increase the spectrum of crop plants in which an active herbicidal 3- isoxazolidinone compound may be used without injury to the crop and without decreasing the herbicidal efficacy against weeds. Summary of the Invention This invention comprises novel herbicidal composi¬ tions which provide excellent protection for a variety of crops from adverse herbicidal injury which composition com¬ prises an herbicidally effective amount of a 3-isoxazolidinone and a substantially non-phytotoxic, antidotally-effective amount of an herbicide antidote, selected from the group con¬ sisting of amides of haloalkonoic acids, aromatic oxime deri¬ vatives, thiazole carboxylic acids and derivatives and sub¬ stituted phenylpyri idines. In a preferred embodiment the composition also in¬ cludes a second or co-herbicide preferably a thiolcarbamate, in particular S-ethyl dipropyl thiolcarbamate. The invention also comprises a method for control¬ ling undesirable vegetation in the presence of a crop, par¬ ticularly corn, by applying to the locus of the crop or unde- sired vegetation an herbicidal composition as described here- inabove. Detailed Description of the Invention Herbicidal 3-isoxazolidinones are described in U.S. Patent 4,405,357 issued September 30, 1983, along with methods for their preparation. An especially preferred compound is 2-[2-chloro- phenyl] methyl-4,4 dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone, example 16 of the above-identified Patent. This compound, COMMAND ® , is a commercially available herbicide known by the generic name clomazone. Clomazone is phytotoxic to certain crops when applied at rates effective to control undesired vegetation. One method for production of COMMAND ® is disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,405,357. Such preparation includes adding SUBSTITUTESHEET to a stirred solution of 6.3 grams (0.023 mole) of 3-chloro-N- (2-chlorophenyl)methyl-N-hydroxy-2,2-dimethylpropanamide in 45 ml of methanol dropwise a solution of 1.5 grams (0.023 mole) KOH (85% pure) in 25 ml methanol. The addition required 15 minutes and the temperature rose from 24 to 32°C. Upon completion of addition the reaction mixture was stirred for 18 hours at ambient temperature. By-product KC1 was removed by filtering the mixture. The filtrate was poured into 500 ml of ice-water. The mixture was extracted with two portions of 250 ml each of methylene chloride. The combined extracts were dried with MgSO. and filtered. Under reduced pressure the filtrate was concentrated to give 5.2 grams of 2-(2-chloro- phenyl)methyl-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone as an oil. Other substituted 4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone herbicidal compounds may be prepared in the manner described hereinabove, by varying the reactant compound and amount and the grams of KOH in each case. For example, 2-(2-bromophenyl) methyl-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone can be prepared by using N-(2-bromophenyl)methyl-3-chloro-N-hydroxy-2,2-dimethyl pro- panamide and 0.75 g of 85% pure KOH in 40 ml of methanol. The active 3-isoxazolidinones of this invention will generally be applied in diluted form for preemergence or preplant incorporation for effective control of many broad- leaved and grassy weed species. The active compounds of this invention may be applied from a tank mix with other herbi¬ cides. A wide range of chemical substances have been found to be effective as herbicide antidotes, and the preferred compositions of this invention include any one or more of such antidotes with the active isoxazolidinone herbicides. The variety of crops on which the above described herbicides are useful can be significantly broadened by the use of an antidote to protect one of more crops from injury therefrom and render the composition more selective against weeds. Some of the more important types of antidotes are amides of SUBSTITUTESHEET haloalkanoic acids, aromatic oxime derivatives, thiazole car¬ boxylic acids and derivatives, naphthopyranone derivatives and substituted phenylpyrimidines. Amides of haloalkanoic acids have the generalized formula 0 tl RCN: in which R is a mono- or poly-haloalkyl group. The halogens may be variously chloro, bromo or iodo; chloro is the pre¬ ferred halogen, and the preferred group for R in these com¬ pounds in general is dichloromethy1, Cl CH-, i.e., the com¬ pounds are amides of dichloroacetic acid. In such compounds the nitrogen is further substituted by at least one other functional group or forms a portion of a heterocyclic ring, as will be described below. Antidotes of this type are described in a number of publications such as U.S. Patents 4,021,224; 4,256,481; 4,294,764; 4,900,350; European Patent Application, Publication No. 104,495, International Patent Application WO 81/406, and British Patent 1,521,540. U.S. Patent 4,021,224 contains a broad disclosure of such types of compounds and indicates a great many possibilities for mono- or di-substitution on the nitrogen atom. SUBSTITUT One type of antidote disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,021,224 is N,N-diallyl diehloroacetamide, which is generally known commercially as R-25788 or dichlor- mid. Another class of haloalkanoic acid amides is that in which the nitrogen atom in the foregoing formula is con¬ tained in a heterocyclic ring, for instance an oxazolidine or thiazolidine ring. Preferably R is dichloromethyl, and the preferred compounds have the general formula In this formula, X is oxygen or sulfur, and R 1,-Ro- are vari- ously independently hydrogen, lower alkyl, alkoxyalkyl, alkyl- thioalkyl, dialkylaminomethyl, methylcarboxyalkyl, lower alkysulfonylmethyl or phenyl, or R and R_ taken together form an alkylene group, preferably a butylene, pentylene or hexylene group, optionally substituted by one or two methyl groups. Compounds of these types are disclosed, for instance, in U.S. Patents 4,021,224, 4,256,481, 4,900,350, European Patent Application No. 104,495 and International Patent Appli¬ cation WO 81/406. A preferred group of these compounds has the above formula in which X is oxygen or sulfur; R is hydrogen, C--C 6 alkyl or methylcarboxy (C.-C. alkyl; R is hydrogen or C.-Cg alkyl; or R. and R taken together form a butylene, pentylene or hexylene group optionally substituted by one or two methyl groups; R_ is hydrogen, .-Cg alkyl, C_-C. alkoxyalkyl, phenyl or di-(C.-C. alkyl)aminomethyl (in which the alkyl groups may be the same or different; R. is hydrogen or C.-C 8 alkyl; and R_ and R g are independently hydrogen or C.-Cg alkyl (prefer¬ ably hydrogen) . Representative compounds of this type include (where not specified, the substituent is hydrogen) : Oxazolidines .X - oxygen. 2,2-dimethyl-N-dichloroacetyl oxazolidine (R. and R_ = methyl); 2,2-5 trimethyl-N-dichloroacetyl oxazolidine (R_, R_ and R 3 = methyl) ; 2,2-dimethyl-5-n-propyl-N-dichloroacetyl oxazolidine (R., R 2 = methyl, R_ = n-propyl) ; 2,2-spirocyclohexyl-N-propyl-N-dichloroacetyl oxazolidine (R. plus R, taken together = pentamethylene) ; 2,2-dimethyl-N-dichloroacetyl-5-ethyl oxazolidine (R-, R« = methyl, R_ = ethyl) ; 2,2-dimethyl-5-phenyl-N-dichloroacetyl oxazolidine (R_, R_ = methyl, R 3 = phenyl); 2,2-dimethyl-5-(diisobutylaminomethylene)-N-dichloroacetyl oxazolidine (R , R 2 = methyl; R 3 = (N,N-diisobutylamino) methylene; Thiazolidine _X = sulfur) 2-methyl, 2-methylcarboxymethyl-N-dichloroacetyl thiazolidine (R χ - methyl, R 2 - CH 2 COOCH 3 ) ; 2,2 dimethyl-N-dichloroacetyl thiazolidine (R and R, = methyl) Other compounds in which R. and R_ taken together are alkylene are disclosed for instance in British Patents 1,512,540 and 2,023,582 and Hungarian Patent 181,621. SUBSTITUTESHEET A third type of haloalkanoic acid amide is disclosed generally in U.S. Patent 4,294,764 and has the general formula in which R_ may be one of a number of alkyl, alkenyl or alkynyl moieties; R g , R Q , R 1Q and R 1;L are independently hy¬ drogen or methyl; and n is 0 or 1. A representative compound of this type is the compound N-(l,3-dioxolan-2-yl-methyl)-N- (2-propenyl)-2,2-dichloroacetamide, which has the formula This corresponds to the previous formula in which R_ is 2-pro- penyl, R g and R g are both hydrogen and n is 0. A fourth type of haloalkanoic acid amide is dis¬ closed in U.S. Patents 4,601,745 and 4,618,361, and has the general formula in which, among others, is .-Cg haloalkyl, R 2 ~ R 5 are :Lnde " pendently hydrogen or C.-C. alkyl, R g and R.^ are hydrogen, halogen, and a number of other substituents, and X is oxygen, sulfur, -SO- or -SO,. Preferably R is dichloromethyl and X is oxygen. A preferred member of this group is 4-(dichloro- acetyl)-3,4-benzoxazine (R. = dichloromethyl; R 2 = methyl; R -R = hydrogen; X = oxygen) , also known as CGA-154281. Substituted phenylpyrimidines are disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,493,726 and have the general formula in which R is hydrogen or a number of substituents; n is an integer from 1 to 5; R. and R 3 are independently halogen or a number of substituents and R 2 is hydrogen, halogen, C.-Cg alkyl, C.-Cg haloalkyl or phenyl. One member of this group is 4,6-dichloro,2-phenylpyrimidine (R = hydrogen, R. and R 3 = chlorine; R 2 = hydrogen) , also known as fenchori or CGA-123407. Oxime derivatives which are suitable for use as antidotes with herbicides are disclosed, for instance, in U.S. Patents 4,070,389 and 4,269,775 and have the general formula in which R. 3 is optionally hydrogen, methyl, methoxy, chlo¬ rine, cyano or trifluoromethyl, and in which R_ 2 is cyano or a number of other moieties as indicated in U.S. Patent 4,269,775. Representative compounds of this type are those in which R., is cyano and in which R _ is 1,3 dioxolan-2-yl. The latter compound has the chemical name 0-[2-(l,3-dioxol- anyl)methyl]-alpha-cyano-benzaldoxime. Thiazole carboxylic acids and derivatives suitable for use as antidotes are disclosed generally in U.S. Patent 4,199,506 and have the general formula in which R. g is alkyl, haloalkyl or trialkoxymethyl; R.. is variously hydrogen, agriculturally acceptable cations or var¬ ious hydrocarbamyl or substituted hydrocarbamyl moieties; m is 0 or 1 and R._ is chloro, bromo, iodo, lower alkoxy or substituted or unsubstituted phenoxy. A representative mem¬ ber of this class is the compound benzyl-2-chloro-4-trifluoro- methyl-5-thiazole carboxylate (R 16 = trifluoromethyl; R- 4 = benzyl, R 5 = chloro; m = 1) . Two other antidotes which may be used with the active isoxazolidinone herbicide in compositions according to this invention are: 2-(dichloromethyl)-2-methyl-l,3-dioxolane: (Disclosed in European Patent Application #198,879) and SUB 2-(dichloromethyl)-2-thiazoline: The amount of a given antidote to be utilized in combination with the herbicide composition of this invention and the manner of its utilization and resulting efficacy can vary according to various parameters such as the particular antidote to be employed, the crop which is to be protected, the amount or rate of herbicide to be applied, and the soil and climatic conditions of the agricultural environment in which the mixture is to be applied. The selection of a spe¬ cific antidote for use in the herbicide composition, the man¬ ner in which it is to be applied (e.g., tank mix, infurrow application, seed treatment, etc.), the determination of ac¬ tivity which is non-phytotoxic but antidotally effective, and the amount necessary to provide this result, can be readily performed utilizing the test procedures in the cited patents such as U.S. Patent 4,021,224, in accordance with common prac¬ tice in the art. The antidote is applied in conjunction with the herbicide in a non-phytotoxic antidotally effective amount. "Non-phytotoxic" is defined as an amount of the antidote which causes at most minor or no injury to the desired crop species. "Antidotally effective" is defined as an antidote used in an amount which is effective as an antidote with the herbicide to decrease the extent of injury caused by the herbicide to the desired crop species. "Herbicidally effective" is defined as the amount of herbicide required to effect a meaningful injury or des¬ truction of a significant portion of affected undesired weeds or plants. SUBSTITUTESHEET Another embodiment of this invention includes thiol¬ carbamate co-herbicides in the composition comprising 3-isoxa- zolidinone compounds and antidotes thereof. Co-herbicidal compounds of preference include the following: S-ethyl dipropyl thiolcarbamate S-ethyl diisobutyl thiolcarbamate S-propyl dipropyl thiolcarbamate S-2,3,3-trichloroallyl diisopropyl thiolcarbamate S-ethyl N-cyclohexyl N-ethylthiolcarbamate S-ethyl bis-(2-methylpropyl) carbamothioate All of the above specifically-named herbicides are known in the art, and they are described in U.S. Patent Nos. 2,913,327 and 3,330,643. Still other classes of herbicidal compounds contem¬ plated for combination with this invention include acetamide herbicides such as alachlor, butachlor, acetochlor and metol- achlor; S-triazine herbicides such as metribuzin; p-toluidine herbicides such as trifluralin; sulfonylurea herbicides such as nicosulfuron and primisulfuron; benzoic acid derivatives such as dicamba and the like. In some cases it may be advantageous to also include in the composition a substance which can provide extension in time of the activity of thiolcarbamate herbicides, in an amount effective to extend this activity. Such substances are generally referred to as "thiocarbamate herbicide extenders." A number of substances have been found which possess these properties. Examples of such substances are certain types of organophosphorus compounds, carbamates and amines, which are disclosed respectively in European Patent Applications Publication Nos. 10,178, 38,945, and 78,146 and a number of carbamates, thiocarbamates and dithiocarbamates as disclosed in Canadian Patent No. 1,262,059. These patent applications disclose tests for determining whether a sub¬ stance has such extending activity, and determining what amount of substance is required in a given case to provide SUBSTITUTESHEET this activity. As with the antidotes, such thiocarbamate herbicide extenders may be physically incorporated into the herbicidal composition or applied separately to the same ultimate locus. Preferred extenders in such compositions are the compound 0,O-diethy1-O-pheny1 phosphorothioate, disclosed for such use in European Patent Application, Publication No. 10,178 and N,N-bis(3-chloroallyl) S-ethyl thiocarbamate, dis¬ closed in the Canadian Patent No. 1,262,059. The herbicidal compositions according to this inven¬ tion contain the 3-isoxazolidinone and antidotes in a weight ratio, respectively, of from about 0.1:1.0 to about 30:1 (ex¬ clusive of auxiliary ingredients) . Another preferred weight ratio is from about 1:1 to about 20:1. An even more preferred weight ratio from about 2:1 to about 15:1. Biological Evaluation The following examples are provided for illustra¬ tive purposes only and are not intended as necessarily repre¬ sentative of the overall testing performed and are not in¬ tended to limit the invention in any way. As one skilled in the art is aware, in herbicidal testing, a significant number of factors that are not readily controllable can affect the results of individual tests. Results may vary depending on environmental factors, depth of planting, the application rate of the herbicide and antidote, the ratio of components in an herbicidal composition and the nature of plants being tested. Additionally results may vary from crop to crop and within varieties. The following antidotes were employed in Example I and in Tables I and II: 1 = N,N-diallyl dichloroacetamide 2 = 2,2,5-trimethyl-N-dichloroacetyl oxazolidine 3 = 2,2 dimethyl-N-dichloroacetyl thiazolidine SUBSTITUTE SHEET The following hybrids of corn were employed in Example I and in Tables I, II: A = CN 8415 B = CN 7751 C = CN 6595 D = CN 7780 E = CN 3901 EXAMPLE I The herbicide COMMAND ® and antidotes as described herein- above were applied preemergence onto soil in aluminum flats (10 x 21 x 6 ci deep) from a tank mix solution with a carrier volume of 25 gal/A. Seeds were planted 2 cm deep, in a sandy loam soil with pH 6.7, 0.8% organic matter and 8.9% clay. The soil was fortified with 17-17-17 fertilizer and the fun¬ gicide Captam 80W. Five hybrids of corn were utilized as summarized hereinabove. Additionally, green foxtail (Setaria viridis) was planted. After treatment, all flats were placed into a green¬ house. Greenhouses were maintained at about 25°C and 20°C, day and night temperature, respectively. All flats were wa¬ tered to field capacity. Visual ratings of weed control and crop injury were recorded 9 days after treatment (Table I) and 27 days after treatment (Table II) corresponding to early rating data and late rating data. Ratings are stated as per¬ centage of weed control of each weed species as compared with an untreated control. The control ratings range from 0 to 100%, where 0 represents no effect on growth and 100 repre¬ sents complete kill. Additionally, ratings are stated as percent tolerance for individual corn varieties, where 0 re¬ presents no effect on a given parameter and 100 represents complete effect on a given parameter. Good protection from bleaching and stunting resulted in corn with antidote compounds at the early rating (Table I) with lower rates of COMMAND ® . Late ratings (Table II) indicate that corn itself would outgrow the lower level of injury observed at lower COMMAND ® application rates, however, the lower rate of injury that appeared in the early ratings indicate that the anti¬ dotes could be used to eliminate the bleaching symptoms that appear due to carryover, or eliminate unacceptable early in¬ jury to corn. SUBSTITUTESHEET TABLE I MEAN PERCENT CORN TOLERANCE AND WEED CONT NINE DAYS AFTER TREATMENT Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Toler fit Antidote (lb/A) Foxtail B D 1 2 1 2 1 2 O COMMAND ,"® 65 30 40 0 30 10 5 5 z D COMMAND ,® 20 15 5 5 0 0 3 0 -i + 1 π 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 10 o 5 5 0 5 0 0 5 0 COMMAND ,® 10 5 5 5 3 0 15 10 + 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 10 10 5 COMMAND ,«> 3 5 15 10 3 5 3 + 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TABLE I (continued) Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Tolerance & Antidote (lb/A) Foxtail B D E AVG 1 2 O COMMAND® 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 10 0 10 0 6 C CD CO H Control 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 10 0 6 H Cj COMMAND® 60 5 60 0 40 5 40 10 0 5 40 5 --i m X COMMAND® 25 15 20 10 20 10 5 0 0 0 14 7 m + ι -\ 40 10 25 10 10 5 0 5 0 0 15 6 35 10 35 10 40 0 35 10 5 5 30 7 COMMAND ,® 35 5 30 0 15 5 20 10 0 10 20 6 + 2 10 5 5 5 3 10 3 5 0 5 4 6 30 10 30 10 10 10 16 7 TABLE I (continued) Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Tolerance fit Antidote (lb/A) Foxtail B E AVG COMMAND' 95 15 5 15 10 5 15 25 5 5 15 13 10 O + 3 75 10 5 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 5 3 3 85 10 5 0 10 3 10 5 5 0 10 4 8 o Control 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 5 0 5 COMMAND ,'® 95 85 10 75 35 70 10 70 5 20 0 64 12 COMMAND 95 75 15 65 15 60 10 75 10 5 10 56 12 + 1 95 40 15 35 5 25 10 40 0 0 5 28 7 95 85 30 60 15 50 70 10 53 11 TABLE I (continued) Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Tolerance & Antidote ( lb/ A) Foxtail B E AVG 1 2 COMMAND ,® 95 60 15 60 10 40 40 10 10 41 10 CO + 2 <___ CD CO 95 40 35 30 40 15 30 5 H C H 100 60 15 50 10 40 10 70 35 51 9 m co _r COMMAND' 98 50 70 60 75 0 0 52 1 m + 3 πi 95 35 20 . 30 15 25 5 15 0 0 5 21 9 95 40 10 40 10 15 10 20 10 0 10 23 10 Control 0+0 0 15 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 5 TABLE I (continued) Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Tolerance & Antidote (lb/A) Foxtail B D E AVG COMMAND ,«» 95 75 10 75 10 65 75 70 72 7 co -^ COMMAND ® 100 90 10 80 75 80 10 60 10 77 8 03 + 1 _ H 100 75 10 75 15 65 10 75 15 35 10 65 12. C H m ω 100 80 10 80 15 70 10 75 10 50 5 71 10 __c rη COMMAND' 100 80 10 80 10 75 10 85 15 40 0 72 9 + 2 100 70 10 70 10 75 10 75 10 3 10 59 10 100 75 15 75 15 60 15 75 15 40 15 65 15 TABLE I (continued) Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Tolerance & Antidote (lb/A) Foxtail B D E AVG COMMAND ® 100 75 15 75 10 65 10 85 15 65 73 10 + 3 COMMAND , 2-(2-chlorophenyl)methyl-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone 1 = Pigment loss (incidence of bleaching and chlorosis) 2 -= Stunting TABLE II MEAN PERCENT CORN TOLERANCE AND WEED CONTROL 27 DAYS AFTER TREATMENT Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Tolerance fit Antidote (lb/A) Foxtail B D E AVG 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 COMMAND' 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 COMMAND ,® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! + 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ COMMAND ,«' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TABLE II (continued) Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Tolerance & Antidote (lb/A) Foxtail B E AVG COMMAND® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 3 O cz 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H c rτι Control 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D® 20 5 5 5 0 10 0 5 15 0 0 D® 15 5 0 5 20 0 15 5 0 5 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 15 20 20 14 TABLE II (continued) Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Tolerance St Antidote (lb/A) Foxtail B E AVG 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 COMMAN ,® 0.0625 65 10 0 5 0 5 0 10 0 0 0 6 0 o + 2 + 0.125 z D 0.0625 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0.25 0.0625 80 15 10 5 0 5 0 10 5 5 0 7 2 + 0.5 τι o COMMAND® 0.0625 30 5 0 5 0 3 0 10 5 5 0 6 1 + 3 0.125 0.0625 35 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0.25 0.0625 35 10 5 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 4 1 0.50 Control 0+0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TABLE II (continued) Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Tolerance & Antidote (lb/A) Foxtail B AVG COMMAND ® 90 50 70 20 10 20 20 30 10 21 26 CO C_ W COMMAN _• 85 35 25 30 10 10 20 18 9 CO + 1 cr 60 15 10 0 20 20 14 1 Hm co x 80 50 75 40 20 40 20 40 20 35 0 m -] COMMAND' 90 10 0 30 0 5 5 20 10 15 0 + 2 50 10 0 15 5 10 0 30 15 15 0 95 40 15 40 0 40 0 70 40 35 10 TABLE II (continued) Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Tolerance _ Antidote (lb/A) Foxtail B E AVG 1 2 1 2 95 30 5 20 0 15 0 40 35 20 0 25 8 100 15 15 10 10 15 25 0 15 15 4 100 35 25 10 15 10 35 20 25 4 co X Control 0+0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R •Ht COMMAND _® 0.25+ 100 75 50 70 40 65 35 50 50 50 35 62 42 0 COMMAND' 0.25+ 100 100 100 75 50 70 40 75 75 50 0 74 53 + 1 0.25 0.25+ 100 25 80 65 40 50 30 50 20 40 20 46 38 0.50 0.25+ 100 100 100 85 75 65 40 65 40 65 35 76 58 1.0 TABLE II (continued) Herbicide Rate Green Corn Variety Tolerance St Antidote (lb/A) Foxtail B E AVG 1 2 100 100 75 45 70 30 75 50 40 5 72 46 35 60 35 20 25 20 50 40 20 33 28 75 75 75 50 50 50 75 40 70 45 69 52 100 100 75 35 75 50 75 75 35 50 72 62 35 35 35 35 30 25 35 30 35 30 34 31 75 70 75 40 40 20 60 20 40 25 58 35 Control 0+0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 = Pigment loss (incidence of bleaching and chlorosis) 2 = Stunting A. COMMAND ® 2-(2-chlorophenyl)methyl-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone EXAMPLE 2 The experimental conditions were as described in Example 1. However, both COMMAND ® and ERADICANE ® were applied to sandy loam soil by pre-plant incorporation 3 inch deep. Seeds of giant foxtail and two corn hybrids were planted, 2 cm deep in aluminum flats. An objective of this test was to determine if addi¬ tional amounts of Compound 2 would be required to antidote COMMAND ® injury. ERADICANE ® contains a 24:1 ratio of ERADICANE ® to Compound 2; additional mixtures were made to contain a 12:1 and 6:1 ratio of ERADICANE ® to Compound 2. These mixtures were applied pre-plant incorporation to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 oz/A COMMAND ® . The results are exhibited in Table III. TABLE III ANTIDOTING OF COMMAND INJURY BY ERADICANE 11 DAYS AFTER TREATMENT 1. COMMAND = 2 - (2-chlorophenyl)methyl-4,4 dimethyl-3- isoxazolidinone ERADICANE ® = S-ethyl-N,N, dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC) plus 2,2,5-trimethyl 3-(dichloroacetyl)-l,3-oxazolidine (Compound 2) ERADICANE ® contains a 24:1 ratio of EPTC to Compound 2, ERADICANE ® 2x contains a 12:1 ratio of EPTC to Compound ; ERADICANE ® 4X contains a 6:1 ratio of EPTC to Compound 2 2. GF -- Giant Foxtail at 28 DAT 3. Mean % pigment loss 4. A = CN 656 B -ft- CN 8711 SUBSTITUTE SHEET ERADICANE-* reduced COMMAND ® injury on both corn hybrids. Increasing the ratio of antidote compound No. 2 did not further reduce corn injury with rates of COMMAND ® between 1-2 oz/A. When 3.0 oz/A COMMAND ® was applied severe corn in¬ jury was observed. Additional antidote applied with ERADICANE ® (2X and 4X treatments) antidoted COMMAND ® injury significantly better than ERADICANE ® alone. EXAMPLE 3 Field experiments were conducted using a randonized block design with three replications per treatment. COMMAND ® or COMMAND ® and ERADICANE ® 6.7-E formulated as an emulsifable concentrate were tank mixed and pre-plant incorporated into the soil. ERADICANE ® 6.7-E was applied at the rate of 4 lb/A. COMMAND ® was applied at the rate of 0.062, 0.125, 0.250 and 0.375 lb/A. Field corn, P3475, a moderately tolerant hybrid to COMMAND ® injury and P3377, a susceptible hybrid to COMMAND ® injury were seeded on the same day as treatment. Corn injury and weed control were evaluated 10 and 27 days after treatment (Tables IV and V) as hereinabove discussed. The percent chlorosis exhibited in both corn hybrids at 10 and 27 days after treatment increased with increased application rates of COMMAND ® . When ERADICANE ® was applied the percent chlorosis of both corn hybrids significantly de¬ creased at the higher rates of COMMAND ® application. SUBSTITUTESHEET TABLE IV MEAN PERCENT CORN INJURY AND WEED CONTROL TEN DAYS AFTER TREATMENT Corn Variety Injury' 1 Herbicide "1 Rate Giant Velvet Redroot Treatment (lb/A) Foxtail Leaf Pigweed A B 3 ERADICANE' 0 ' 4.0 90 100 100 0 0 ERADICANE ® + 4.0+ 98 100 100 13 10 COMMAND ® 0.062 ERADICANE ® + 4.0+ 100 100 100 15 COMMAND ® 0.125 ERADICANE ® + 4.0+ 100 100 100 63 30 COMMAND _«'> 0.25 CO X D ERADICANE"" 4.0+ 100 100 100 73 37 COMMAND ® 0.375 COMMAND ,® 0.062 22 55 42 18 8 COMMAND ® 0.125 38 32 52 63 23 COMMAND ® 0.25 65 93 77 78 63 COMMAND ® 0.375 88 97 97 90 78 Control 0 0 0 2 0 1. ERADICANE" 01 = EPTC (S-ethyl-dipropylthiocarbamate) plus antidote Compound No. 2 (2,2,5-trimethyl-3-(dichloroacetyl)-1,3 oxazolidine) COMMAND ® = 2-(2-chlorophenyl)methyl-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoazoladinone 2. % clorosis 3. A = Zea mays P3377 (susceptible hybrid to COMMAND ® injury) B = Zea mays P3475 (moderately tolerant hybrid to COMMAND injury) B = Zea mays P3475 (moderately tolerant hybrid to COMMAND injury) EXAMPLE 4 Field experiments were conducted using a randomized block design with three replications per treatment. COMMAND ® as an emulsifiable concentrate was sprayed and incorporated to 3 inches in the soil with or without the oxazolidine antidote. Each field plot was 6.6 feet by 20 feet. Plots were planted to corn and wheat. Two days after planting the plots were irrigated with water due to dry conditions. Thereafter, no supplemental irrigation was necessary. The crops were rated for % phytotoxicity (as % bleaching) at 8, 14 and 21 days after treatment. The results are exhibited in Table VI. Injury from the high rate of COMMAND ® (0.25 lb/A) was decreased with the antidote. The low rate of COMMAND ® (0.125 lb/A) did not cause significant phytotoxicity and the antidote did not significantly reduce the small % of phyto¬ toxicity. Wheat was not antidoted against COMMAND ® at the rates applied. TABLE VI MEAN PERCENT CROP INJURY' Corn DK656 Treatment" Rate ( lb/A) .M. COMMAND ,"® 0.125 COMMAND ® 0.125 + Antidote 0.167 COMMAND ® 0.25 COMMAND ® 0.25 + Antidote 0.167 Antidote 0.167 Control 0 1. = % Bleaching 2. = COMMAND ® is 2-(2-chlorophenyl)methyl-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone Antidote is 2,2,5-trimethyl-3-(dichloroacetyl)-l,3-oxazolidine The antidote compounds and compositions of the pre¬ sent invention can be used in any convenient form. Thus the antidote compounds can be formulated into emulsifiable liquids, emulsifiable concentrates, liquids, wettable powders, powders, granules, microcapsules, or any other convenient form. In its preferred form, an herbicidal antidote compound in a non- phytotoxic quantity with respect to the crop is admixed with a selected herbicide and incorporated into the soil prior to or after planting the seed or applied pre-emer- gence. It is to be understood, however, that the herbicides can be incorporated into the soil and thereafter the antidote compound can be incorporated into the soil. Moreover, the crop seed itself can be treated with a non-phytotoxic quantity of the compound and planted into the soil which has been treated with herbicides, or untreated with the herbicide and subsequently treated with the herbicide. The addition of the antidote compound does not effect the herbicidal activity of the herbicides except to render the activity selective with respect to beneficial crops. The amount of antidote compound present can range between about 0.01 to about 30 parts by weight of antidote compound described herein per each part by weight of herbi¬ cide. The exact amount of antidote compound will usually be determined on economic ratios for the most effective amount usable. It is understood that a non-phytotoxic quantity of antidote compound with respect to a particular crop will be employed in the herbicidal compositions described herein. Formulations The compounds and compositions can be formulated in the same manner in which herbicides are generally formulated. The object of the formulation is to apply the compounds and compositions to the locus where control is desired by ITUTE SHEET conventional method. The locus may include soil, seeds, seed¬ lings, crop, crop seeds and vegetation. Useful formulations of the compounds of this inven¬ tion can be prepared in conventional ways. They include dusts, granules, microcapsules, pellets, solutions, suspensions, emul¬ sions, wettable powders, emulsifiable concentrates and the like. Many of these may be applied directly to the locus. Sprayable formulations can be extended in suitable media and used at spray volumes of from a few liters to several hundred liters per hectare. High strength compositions are primarily used as intermediates for further formulation. The formula¬ tions, broadly, contain about 0.1% to 99% by weight of active herbicide and antidote ingredient(s) and optionally at least one of (a) about 0.1% to 20% surfactant(s) and (b) about 1% to 99.9% solid or liquid inert diluent(s) . More specifically, they can contain these ingredients in the following approxi¬ mate proportions. Aqueous Suspension 10-50 Dusts 1-25 Granules and Pellets 0.1-95 Compositions 90-99 * Active ingredient plus at least one of a Surfactant or a Diluent equals 100 weight percent. TITUTESHEET Lower or higher levels of active ingredient can be present depending on the intended use and the physical pro¬ perties of the compound. Higher ratios of surfactant to ac¬ tive ingredient are sometimes desirable, and are achieved by incorporation into the formulation or by tank mixing. Dusts are free-flowing powder compositions contain¬ ing the formulant impregnated on a particulate carrier. The particle size of the carriers is usually in the approximate range of 30 to 50 microns. Examples of suitable carriers are talc, bentonite, diatomaceous earth, and pyrophyllite. The composition generally contains up to 50% of formulant. Anti- caking and anti-static agents may also be added. Dusts may be applied by spraying from boom sprayers, hand sprayers or airplanes. Wettable powders are finely divided compositions comprising a particular carrier impregnated with the formulant and additionally containing one or more surface active agents. The surface active agent promotes rapid dispersion of the powder in an aqueous medium to form stable, sprayable suspen¬ sions. A wide variety of surface active agents can be used, for example, long chain fatty alcohols and alkali metal salts of sulfated fatty alcohols; salts of sulfonic acid; esters of long chain fatty acids; and polyhydric alcohols, in which the alcohol groups are free, omega-substituted polyethylene glycols of relatively long chain length. A list of surface active agents suitable for use in agriculture formulations can be found in Wade Van Valkenburg, Pesticide Formulations (Marcel Dekker, Inc., N.Y., 1973) at pages 79-84. Granules comprise the formulant impregnated on a particulate inert carrier having a particle size of about 1 to 2 millimeters (mm) in diameter. The granules can be made by spraying a solution of the formulant in a volatile solvent onto the granular carrier. Examples of suitable carriers for the preparation of granules include clay, vermiculate saw¬ dust, and granular carbon. Microcapsules and other slow release formulations are advantageous as formulations to deliver and distribute the active ingredients. Microcapsules consist of fully en¬ closed droplets or granules containing the active materials in which the enclosing material is an inert porous membrane, arranged to allow escape of the enclosed materials to the surrounding medium at controlled rates over a specified period of time. Encapsulated droplets are typically about 1 to 50 microns in diameter. The enclosed liquid typically consti¬ tutes about 50 to 95% of the weight of the entire capsule, and may contain an amount of solvent in addition to the active materials. Encapsulated granules are characterized by porous membranes sealing the openings of the granule carrier pores, trapping the liquid containing the active components inside for controlled release. A typical granule size ranges from 1 millimeter to 1 centimeter in diameter. In agricultural usage, the granule size is generally about 1 to 2 millimeters in diameter. Granules formed by extrusion, agglomeration or prilling are useful in the present invention as well as mate¬ rials in their naturally occurring form. Examples of such carriers are vermiculite, starch sintered clay granules, kao¬ lin, attapulgite clay, sawdust and granular carbon. Useful encapsulating materials include natural and synthetic rubbers, cellulosic materials, styrenebutadiene copolymers, poly- acrylonitriles, polyacry- lates, polyesters, polyamides, polyureas, polyurethanes and starch xanthates. Emulsifiable concentrates consist of an oil solu¬ tion of the formulant plus and emulsifying agent. Prior to use, the concentrate is diluted with water to form a suspended emulsion of oil droplets. The emulsifiers used are usually a mixture of anionic and nonionic surfactants, other additives, such as suspending agents and thickeners, may be included in the emulsifiable concentrate. When the formulant is an antidote and herbicide composition, the proportion of antidote compound to herbicide compound generally ranges from approximately 0.001 to 30 parts by weight of the antidote compound per weight of the herbicide compound. Formulations generally contain several additives in addition to the formulant and carrier or agent. Among these are inert ingredients, diluent carriers, organic solvents, water, oil and water, water in oil emulsions, carriers of dust and granules, and surface active wetting, dispersing and emulsifying agents. Fertilizers, e.g., ammonium nitrate urea and superphosphate, may also be included. Aids to rooting and growth, e.g., compost, manure, humus and sand, may also be included. Alternatively, the compounds and compositions of this invention can be applied to a crop by addition to irri¬ gation water supplied to the field to be treated. This method of application permits the penetration of the compositions into the soil as the water is absorbed therein. As another alternative, the formulation can be ap¬ plied to the soil in the form of a solution in a suitable solvent. Solvents frequently used in these formulations in¬ clude kerosene, fuel oil, xylene, petroleum fractions with boiling ranges above xylene and aromatic petroleum fractions rich in methylated naphthalenes. Liquid solutions, like dusts, may be applied by spraying from boom and hand sprayers or airplanes. S

Claims: IT IS CLAIMED: 1. An herbicidal composition comprising, a) an herbicidally-effective amount of a 3-isoxazolidinone herbicide having the formula in which R. and R_ are independently methyl or ethyl; X is hydrogen, methyl, chlorine, bromine, fluorine; Y is chlorine, bromine, fluorine; and n is O, 1 or 2, and b) a non-phytotoxic, antidotally-effective amount of an anti¬ dote compound selected from the group consisting of amides of haloalkanoic acids, aromatic oxime derivatives, thiazole car¬ boxylic acids and derivatives, substituted phenylpyrimidines, 2-(dichloromethyl)-2-methy1-1,3-dioxolane and 2-(dichloro¬ methyl)-2-thiazoline. 2. An herbicidal composition as defined in Claim 1 wherein the herbicide is 2-(2-chlorophenyl)methyl-4,4-dimethyl- 3-isoxazolidinone. 3. An herbicidal composition as defined in Claims 1 and 2 wherein said non-phytotoxic, antidotally-effective antidote is an amide of a haloalkanoic acid. 4. An herbicidal composition as defined in any of Claims 1-3 wherein said antidote compound is N,N-diallyl di- chloroacetamide. 5. An herbicidal composition as defined in any of Claims 1-3 wherein said antidote compound has the formula wherein X is 0 or S; R. is hydrogen, C -C 8 alkyl, or methyl- carboxy-(C 1 -C_)alkyl; R, is hydrogen or C.-Cg alkyl; or R. and R_ taken together form a butylene, pentylene or hexylene group optionally substituted by one or two methyl groups; R_ is hydrogen, C.-Cg alkyl, C--C. alkoxyalkyl, phenyl, or di- (C -C. alkyl)aminomethyl; R. is hydrogen or C.-Cg alkyl; and R 5 and Rg are independently hydrogen or C.-Cg alkyl. 6. An herbicidal composition as defined in any of Claims 1-3 or 5 wherein said antidote compound is 2,2,5-tri- methyl-3-(dichloroacetyl)-l,3-oxazolidine. 7. An herbicidal composition as defined in any of Claims 1-3 wherein said non-phytotoxic, antidotally effective antidote is 4-dichloroacetyl-3,4-dihydro-3-methyl-2H-l,4-benz- oxazine. 8. An herbicidal composition as defined in Claims 1 or 2 wherein said non-phytotoxic, antidotally effective antidote is 4,6-dichloro-2-phenyl pyrimidine. 9. An herbicidal composition as defined in any of Claims 1-8 wherein the ratio of herbicide to antidote is from about 1:1 to about 20:1. SUBSTITUTESHEET 10. An herbicial composition according to any of Claims 1-9 further comprising one or more additional thiol¬ carbamate compounds as co-herbicides. 11. A method of controlling undesirable vegetation in the presence of a crop comprising applying to the locus of said vegetation or said crop an herbicidal composition accord¬ ing to any of Claims 1-10. 12. A method according to Claim 11 wherein the 3-isoxazolidinone and the antidote are first combined into a composition and the composition is applied to the locus. 13. A method according to Claim 11 wherein the 3- isoxazolidinone is applied to the locus and the antidote is separately applied to the locus. 14. A method according to Claim 11 wherein the antidote is applied as a seed treatment for a crop seed prior to planting. 15. A method according to Claim 11 further com¬ prising applying to said locus an amount of a thiolcarbamate herbicide and an amount of a thiolcarbamate extender effective to extend the soil life of the thiolcarbamate herbicide. 16. A method according to Claim 14 in which the crop is corn. SUBSTITUTE SHEET

Inventors: DROST DIRK C, ENSMINGER MICHAEL P, MORGAN THOMAS H JR, URWILER MICHAEL J, WISSMILLER JAMES E, DROST, DIRK, C., ENSMINGER, MICHAEL, P., MORGAN, THOMAS, H., JR., URWILER, MICHAEL, J., WISSMILLER, JAMES, E.
Applicants: ICI AMERICA INC, ICI AMERICAS INC.
Application year: 1991
Main classification: A01N25
IPC codes: A01N43