Herbicidal compositions

Abstract: A synergistic herbicidal composition comprising as active ingredients triazine derivatives represented by general formula [I]: [wherein A represents (wherein Z represents oxygen atom or sulfur atom), or wherein X² represents methyl group or fluorine atom and n represents 0 or an integer of 1 or 2); R¹ represents hydrogen atom or methyl group; and X¹ represents fluorine atom or chlorine atom] and sulfonylurea type herbicide represented by general formula [II]:

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a herbicidal composition comprising triazine derivatives and sulfonylurea type herbicides as active ingredients. STATEMENT OF THE PRIOR ART Heretofore a variety of herbicides have been developed and have contributed to agricultural productivity and saving labor. However, some herbicides have been used over many years and hence, weeds which are insufficiently controlled are increasing. It has thus been desired to develop herbicides having a wide herbicidal spectrum and those effective also against such troublesome weeds. Also in order to counter environmental pollution problems caused by conventional herbicides, it was desirable to develop herbicides having a high activity at a low dosage. Moreover, in order to control weeds emerging non-uniformly over a long period of time, it was desirable to develop herbicides having an excellent residual activity and having flexibility of treatment to exhibit effectiveness even though the treatment is performed over a long period from pre-emergence to a wide range of growing stages of weeds. Under this situation, the present inventors found that specific, novel triazine derivatives containing a haloalkyl are compounds which show a high herbicidal effect against troublesome weeds both by soil treatment and by foliage treatment, without causing any phytotoxicity of Gramineae field crops, and moreover provide an excellent effectiveness against weeds in paddy fields (Japanese Patent Application Nos. 1-38178 and 1-154465). The present inventors made extensive investigations to further improve the herbicidal activity of the triazine derivatives. It has been found that a composition comprising the triazine derivatives in combination with specific sulfonylurea type herbicides exhibits excellent herbicidal activity which can be unexpected from each property of these herbicides and shows a high herbicidal effect at a low dosage and at the same time, has a wide herbicidal spectrum. The present invention has thus been accomplished. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION That is, the present invention provides a herbicidal composition comprising as active ingredients triazine derivatives represented by general formula [I]: [wherein A represents (wherein Z represents an oxygen atom or sulfur atom), or (wherein X² represents a methyl group or a fluorine atom and n represents 0 or an integer of 1 or 2); R¹ represents a hydrogen atom or a methyl group; and X¹ represents a fluorine atom or chlorine atom] and a sulfonylurea type herbicide represented by general formula [II]: [wherein B represents (wherein X³ represents a chlorine atom, CO₂CH₃, CO₂C₂H₅ or OCH₂CH₂Cl), (wherein X⁴ represents CON(CH₃ )₂ or CO₂C₂H₅ ), R² represents a hydrogen atom or methyl group, R³ and R⁴ each represents methyl group, OCH₃ or OCHF₂, provided that R³ and R⁴ may be the same or different; Z² represents CH or a nitrogen atom, and m is 0 or 1]. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Specific examples of the triazine derivatives represented by general formula [I] described above include: 2-amino-4-[1-(benzofuran-2'-yl)ethylamino]-6-(α-fluoro,α-methylethyl)-s-triazine 2-amino-4-[1-(benzofuran-2'-yl)ethylamino]-6-(α-fluoroethyl)-s-triazine 2-amino-4-[1-(benzothiophen-2'-yl)ethylamino]-6-(α-fluoro,α-methylethyl)-s-triazine 2-amino-4-(α-fluoro,α-methylethyl)-6-[2-(3' methylphenoxy)-1-methylethylamino]-s-triazine 2-amino-4-(α-fluoro,α-methylethyl)-6-[2-(3'fluorophenoxy)-1-methylethylamino]-s-triazine 2-amino-4-(α-chloro,α-methylethyl)-6-[2-(3',5'-dimethylphenoxy)-1-methylethylamino]-s-triazine 2-amino-4-(α-fluoro,α-methylethyl)-6-[2-(3',5'-dimethylphenoxy)-1-methylethylamino]-s-triazine etc. The triazine derivatives represented by general formula [I] described above may be prepared by various processes. Among these processes, an advantageous process comprises reacting alkyl amine salts represented by general formula [III]: [wherein A has the same significance as described above and X⁵ represents a halogen atom] with cyanoguanidine represented by the following formula to prepare alkyl biguanide salts represented by general formula [IV]: [wherein A and X⁵ have the same significances as described above]; and then reacting the alkyl biguanide salts with alkyl esters represented by general formula [V]: [wherein R¹ and X¹ have the same significances as described above; and R⁵ represents an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atom]. According to this process, the desired triazine derivatives represented by general formula [I] can be efficiently obtained by reacting the alkylamine salts represented by general formula [III] with cyanoguanidine to prepare the alkyl biguanide salts represented by general formula [IV], and then reacting the salts [IV] with the alkyl esters represented by general formula [V]. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Herein, in the reaction of the alkylamine salts represented by general formula [III] with cyanoguanidine, both compounds may be used in equimolar amounts. As solvents, there may be used cyclic hydrocarbons such as benzene, decaline, alkylnaphthalenes, etc.; chlorinated hydrocarbons such as carbon tetrachloride, ethylene dichloride, chlorobenzene, dichlorobenzene, and trichlorobenzene. The reaction temperature is not particularly limited but the reaction sufficiently proceeds at a high temperature ranging from 80 to 200 °C. According to this reaction, the alkylbiguanide derivative salts shown by general formula [IV] are obtained. By reacting [IV] with alkyl esters represented by general formula [V], the desired triazine derivatives represented by general formula [I] are prepared. This reaction efficiently proceeds generally in a solvent such as alcohols, e.g., methanol, ethanol, and isopropanol, various ketones, aliphatic hydrocarbons, various ethers, and various cyclic hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocarbons, in the presence of a catalyst such as a base, at a temperature of about 10 to about 100 °C. Optical isomers are also present in these compounds and the products are obtained generally in the racemic form. However, it is also possible to prepare the respective enantiomers in a conventional manner such as by asymmetric synthesis. In the present invention, both racemic compounds and optical isomers alone may be used. The products may be in the form of salts with inorganic acid or organic acid. Specific examples of the sulfonylurea type herbicide represented by general formula [II] described above include 2-chloro-N-[4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-aminocarbonyl]benezenesulfonamide, methyl 2-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-aminocarbonyl]-aminosulfonyl]benzoate, methyl 2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-3-methylureidosulfonyl]benzoate, methyl 3-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-aminocarbonyl]-aminosulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylate, 3-(6-methoxy-4-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-1-[2-(2-chloroethoxy)-phenylsulfonyl]urea, methyl 2-[[(4,6-dimethyl-pyrimidin-2-yl) aminocarbonyl]-aminosulfonyl]benzoate, 2-[3-(4,6-bis(difluoromethoxy)-pyrimidin-2-yl)-ureidosulfonyl]benzoic acid methyl ester, 2-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl)- N , N -dimethylnicotinamide, 1-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2-pyridinylsulfonyl)urea, methyl 2-[[[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)aminocarbonyl]-aminosulfonyl]methyl]benzoate, ethyl 5-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl)-1-methylpyrazol-4-carboxylate, etc. Among them, preferred are methyl 2-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-aminocarbonyl]-aminosulfonyl]benzoate, methyl 3-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-aminocarbonyl]-aminosulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylate, 3-(6-methoxy-4-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-1-[2-(2-chloroethoxy)-phenylsulfonyl]urea, 2-[3-(4,6-bis(difluoromethoxy)-pyrimidin-2-yl)-ureidosulfonyl]benzoic acid methyl ester, 2-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl)- N , N -dimethylnicotinamide, 1-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2-pyridinylsulfonyl)urea, methyl 2-[[[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)aminocarbonyl]-aminosulfonyl]methyl]benzoate, and ethyl 5-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl)-1-methylpyrazol-4-carboxylate. Among the sulfonylurea type herbicides represented by general formula [II] described above, 2-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl)- N , N -dimethylnicotinamide and 1-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2-pyridinylsulfonyl)urea can be prepared by the processes described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 62-178588 and Japanese National Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2-500912, respectively. The other sulfonylurea type herbicides can be obtained by known processes. These sulfonylurea type herbicides have a wide spectrum for broad-leaved weeds or Gramineae weeds and are used for Gramineae crops such as wheat, barley, corn, sorghum, and paddy rice plant. The herbicidal composition of the present invention comprises as active ingredients the triazine derivatives represented by general formula [I] described above and the sulfonylurea type herbicides represented by general formula [II] described above. A proportion of these components to be formulated is not particularly limited but in a wide range of proportion, an excellent synergistic effect can be obtained. In general, it is preferred to formulate the triazine derivative and the sulfonylurea type herbicide in a range of from 1000 : 1 to 1 : 100 (weight ratio). The herbicidal composition of the present invention may be used in the form of wettable powders, emulsifiable concentrates, dusts, granules, flowable concentrates, or solutions, by blending the triazine derivatives represented by general formula [I] described above and the sulfonylurea type herbicides represented by general formula [II] described above with liquid carriers such as solvents, etc. or with solid carriers such as mineral powders, etc. In preparing these forms, there may be added surfactants such as emulsifiers, dispersing agents, developers, suspending agents, permeating agents, or stabilizers and, if necessary, other auxiliary agents. Where the herbicidal composition of the present invention is used in the form of wettable powders, 10 to 55 wt% of the aforesaid triazine derivatives and the sulfonylurea type herbicide as active ingredients, 40 to 88 wt% of the solid carrier and 2 to 5 wt% of the surfactant may generally be formulated to prepare a composition and the composition may be used. Where the herbicidal composition is used in the form of emulsifiable concentrate or flowable concentrate, 5 to 50 wt% of the aforesaid triazine derivatives and the sulfonylurea type herbicide as active ingredients, 35 to 90 wt% of the solvent and 5 to 15 wt% of the surfactant and other auxiliary agent may generally be formulated to prepare a composition and the resulting composition may be used. Where the herbicidal composition is used in the form of a dust, 1 to 15 wt% of the aforesaid triazine derivatives and the sulfonylurea type herbicide as active ingredients and 85 to 99 wt% of the solid carrier may generally be formulated to prepare the composition. Where the herbicidal composition of the present invention is used in the form of granules, 0.1 to 15 wt% of the aforesaid triazine derivatives and the sulfonylurea type herbicide as active ingredients, 80 to 97.9 wt% of the solid carrier and 2 to 5 wt% of the surfactant may generally be formulated to prepare a composition. Herein, as the solid carrier, finely divided mineral powders are used. As the finely divided mineral powders, there are diatomaceous earth, oxides such as slaked lime, phosphates such as apatite; sulfates such as gypsum, silicates such as talc, pyrophyllite, clay, kaolin, bentonite, acid clay, white carbon, quartz powders, or silica powders. The liquid carrier, may be organic solvents, for example, paraffin type or naphthene type hydrocarbons such as kerosene, mineral oil, spindle oil, aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, xylene, chlorinated hydrocarbons such as o-chlorotoluene, trichloromethane, trichloroethylene, alcohols such as cyclohexanol, amyl alcohol, ethylene glycol, alcohol ethers such as ethylene glycol monomethyl ether, ethylene glycol monoethyl ether, ketones such as isophorone, cyclohexanone, cyclohexenyl-cyclohexanone, ethers such as butyl cellosolve, dimethyl ether, methyl ethyl ether, esters such as isopropyl acetate, benzyl acetate, methyl phthalate, amides such as dimethylformamide, nitriles such as acetonitrile, propionitrile; sulfoxides such as dimethylsulfoxide, a mixture thereof; or water. The surfactant, to be used may be any of the anionic type (alkylbenzene sulfonate, alkyl sulfonates, laurinamide sulfonate, etc.), nonionic type (polyoxyethylene octyl ether, polyethylene glycol laurate, sorbitan alkyl esters,), cationic type (dimethyllaurylbenzyl ammonium chloride, laurylamine, stearyltrimethyl ammonium chloride,) and the amphoteric type (amino acids, betaine,). For purposes of improving properties of the preparation and enhancing the herbicidal effect, the herbicidal composition of the present invention may also contain high molecular compounds such as sodium alginate, carboxymethyl cellulose, carboxyvinyl polymer, gum arabic, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, and auxiliary agents in combination. The herbicidal composition of the present invention exhibits an excellent effect on weeds in field crops such as corn, sorghum, wheat, barley, oat, as a high degree of selective herbicide without causing any phytotoxicity to crops by pre-or post-emergence treatment to the soil or the foliage of weeds. The herbicidal composition shows a high herbicidal effect not only against annual weeds but also against perennial weeds and is extremely useful as a high degree of selective, herbicide not causing any phytotoxicity for paddy rice plants or lawns. The herbicidal composition of the present invention also exhibits an excellent effect of controlling weeds in orchards or non-cultivated fields (factory areas, railways, roadsides, waterways, fallow grounds) by treatment to the soil or to the foliage of weeds. The herbicidal composition of the present invention is applied in an amount of about 0.1 to 2,000 g, preferably 1 to 200 g, per 10 ares. Where the composition is sprayed over the foliage of plant, the composition is diluted to about 1 to about 20,000 ppm, preferably 10 to 2,000 ppm and the diluted preparation is applied to the foliage. The herbicidal composition of the present invention may also be used in combination with other herbicides. Examples of the conventional herbicides which can be used herein include diphenyl ether compounds, triazine compounds, phenoxyacetic acid compounds, carbamate compounds, thiocarbamate compounds, acid anilide compounds, pyrazole compounds, phosphoric acid compounds, imidazolinone compounds, dinitroaniline compounds, bromoxinyl, ioxinyl, oxadiazone, etc. Furthermore, the herbicidal composition of the present invention may also be used as admixture with insecticides, sterilizers, plant growth regulators, fertilizers, etc., if necessary. Next, the present invention is described with reference to examples. Firstly, a method for making formulations is specifically described by referring to formulation examples. In the following formulation examples, "part" refers to % by weight. As the triazine derivative (Compound A) and the sulfonylurea type herbicide (Compound B) compounds shown in Tables 1 and 2 were used, respectively. Formulation Example 1 Wettable powders Compound A-1 5 parts Compound B-1 15 parts Diatomaceous earth 62 parts White carbon 15 parts Sodium alkylbenzenesulfonate 2 parts Sodium lignin sulfonate 1 part The foregoing components are blended with each other, uniformly kneaded and ground into powders to give 100 parts of wettable powders. Formulation Example 2 Emulsifiable concentrate Compound A-2 10 parts Compound B-2 30 parts Xylene 20 parts Dimethylformamide 20 parts Solpol 2806B (manufactured by Toho Chemical Industry,) 20 parts The foregoing components are uniformly dissolved and blended to give 100 parts of emulsifiable concentrate. Formulation Example 3 Dust Compound A-3 0.6 part Compound B-6 1.4 parts Diatomaceous earth 20 parts Talc 78 parts The foregoing components are blended with each other, uniformly kneaded and ground to give 100 parts of dust. Formulation Example 4 Granule Compound A-5 1 part Compound B-7 3 parts Bentonite 30 parts Talc 63 parts Sodium lignin sulfonate 3 parts The foregoing components are thoroughly blended with each other, uniformly mixed and ground into powders. Water is added to the powders. After kneading them well, the blend is grained and dried to give 100 parts of granules. Formulation Example 5 Flowable concentrate Compound A-7 10 parts Compound B-4 15 parts Methyl cellulose 0.3 part Colloidal silica 1.5 parts Sodium lignin sulfonate 1 part Polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether 2 parts Water 70.2 parts The foregoing components are thoroughly mixed and dispersed. The resulting slurry mixture is subjected to wet grinding to give 100 parts of stable flowable concentrate. Formulation Example 6 Wettable powders By uniformly blending 97 parts of clay (trademark: JIKURAITO, manufactured by JIKURAITO KOGYO) as a carrier, 1.5 parts of alkylaryl sulfonate (trademark: NEOPELEX, manufactured by Kao Atlas Co., Ltd.) as a surfactant, 1.5 parts of nonionic and anionic surfactant (trademark: Solpol 800A, manufactured by Toho Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) and grinding into powders, a carrier for wettable powders was obtained. By uniformly blending 90 parts of this carrier for wettable powders and 10 parts of the triazine derivative shown in Table 1 (Compounds A-1 through A-7) or 10 parts of the sulfonylurea type herbicide shown in Table 2 (Compounds B-1 to B-8) and grinding into powders, wettable powders were obtained. Furthermore, the carrier for wettable powders containing the triazine derivative obtained above was blended with the carrier for wettable powders containing the sulfonylurea type herbicide in definite amounts (ratios as active ingredients), uniformly kneaded and ground into powders to give wettable powders. Example 1 Test on post-emergence treatment Wagner's pots of 1/2000 ares were filled with soil from upland fields and planted with weed seeds of Galium aparine L., Veronica hederifolia and Viola arvensis and crop seeds of wheat, barley and oat. The seeds were then covered with soil and cultivated in a greenhouse. An aqueous suspension of a definite amount of the herbicide obtained in Formulation Example 6 was uniformly sprayed onto the foliage of 1.5 to 2.5 leaf stage of these weeds and 3 leaf stage of the crops at a spray volume corresponding to 100 liters/10 ares. Then, cultivation was performed in the greenhouse. After 20 days, crop injury and the herbicidal effect on the weeds were evaluated according to the criterion described below. The results are shown in Table 3. (Criterion for assessment) Degree of herbicidal effect Percent of weed control (herbicidal rate) 0 less than 5% (little effective) 1 5-20% 2 20-40% 3 40-70% 4 70-90% 5 more than 90% (almost all killed) The herbicidal rate described above was determined according to the following equation by measuring the raw weight of weed on the ground in the treated group and the raw weight of weed on the ground in the untreated group. Degree of crop injury 0 no injury to crops 1 little injury to crops 2 some injury to crops 3 injury to crops 4 serious injury to crops 5 almost all crops are withered to death Some data were extracted from the results shown in Table 3 and the synergistic effect of the triazine derivative and the sulfonylurea type herbicide was examined on Galium aparine L., and Viola arvensis according to the following method. Q a : found data (%) of herbicidal rate when treated at a dosage corresponding to a g/10 ares using the triazine derivative alone as active ingredient Q b : found data (%) of herbicidal rate when treated at a dosage corresponding to b g/10 ares using the sulfonylurea derivative alone as active ingredient Q E : expected value [Limpel, L.E., P.H. Schuldt and D. Lamont, Proc. NEWCC, 16, 48-53 (1962)] Herein, when the found data (herbicidal rate) of the herbicide obtained by mixing the triazine derivative and the sulfonylurea type herbicide is larger than Q E, it can be said that the herbicidal activity is synergistic. The results are shown in Table 4. Example 2 Test on post-emergence treatment Wagner's pots of 1/2000 ares were filled with soil from upland fields and planted with weed seeds of Digitalia sanguinalis , Abutilon theophrasti and Ipomoea purpurea and crop seeds of corn and sorghum. The seeds were then covered with soil and cultivated in a greenhouse. An aqueous suspension of a definite amount of the herbicide obtained in Formulation Example 6 was uniformly sprayed onto the foliage of 2 to 3 leaf stage of these weeds and 3 leaf stage of the crops at a spray volume corresponding to 100 liters/10 ares. Then, cultivation was performed in the greenhouse. After 20 days, crop injury and the herbicidal effect on the weeds were evaluated according to the same criterion described in Example 1. The results are shown in Table 5. Example 3 Paddy field test (post-emergence treatment test) Pots of 1/2000 are were filled with soil from paddy fields and seeded with seeds from Echinochloa crus-galli . Then, water was filled to a depth of 3 cm. Thereafter when Echinochloa crus-galli reached the 1.5-leaf stage, a definite amount of a dilution of the herbicide obtained in Formulation Example 6 was dropped on the water surface. Then, the weeds were allowed to stand in a greenhouse. Twenty days after the treatment, the herbicidal effect on the weeds evaluated according to the criterion of Example 1. The results are shown in Table 6. Example 4 Field test (pre-emergence treatment test) Test zone having each plot of 2 m² were prepared and weed seeds of Galium aparine L., Stellaria media , Viola arvensis , Matricaria inodora , Veronica hederifolia , Papaver rhoeas and Aphanes arvensis and crop seeds of wheat and barley were simultaneously planted. At the pre-emergence timing of wheat, barley and weeds, a given amount of a dilution of the herbicide obtained in Formulation Example 6 was uniformly sprayed over the soil surface at a spray volume corresponding to 20 liters/10 ares. The test was carried out by 3 replications. The weeds on the ground which survived 60 days after spraying of the chemical were cut out and their raw weight were measured. According to the following equation, a weed controlling rate was determined as an average of the 3 replicates. With respect to wheat and barley, their raw weights on the ground were measured also as in weeds and the degree of crop injury (inhibition rate) was determined. The results are shown in Table 7. Active ingredient A-2 + B-1 A-2 + B-1 A-7 + B-1 A-7 + B-1 Dosage (g/10a) 20+0.6 10+0.6 20+0.6 10+0.6 Percent of Weed Control (%) Galium aparine L. 100 100 100 100 Stellaria media 100 100 100 100 Viola arvensis 100 100 100 100 Matricaria inodora 100 100 100 100 Veronica hederifolia 100 100 100 100 Papaver rhoeas 100 100 100 100 Aphanes arvensis 100 100 100 100 Crop Injury Wheat 0 0 0 0 Barley 0 0 0 0 Example 5 Field test (post-emergence treatment test) Test zones having each plot of 2 m² were prepared and weed seeds of Galium aparine L., Stellaria media , Viola arvensis , Matricaria inodora , Veronica hederifolia , Papaver rhoeas and Aphanes arvensis and crop seeds of wheat and barley were simultaneously planted. When weeds grew at the 2-3 leaf stage and wheat and barley reached the 3-leaf stage, a given amount of a dilution of the herbicide obtained in Formulation Example 6 was uniformly sprayed onto the foliage at a spray volume corresponding to 20 liters/10 ares. The percent of weed control and the degree of crop injury were determined 30 days after spraying the chemical in a manner similar to Example 4. The results are shown in Table 8. Active ingredient A-2+B-1 A-2+B-1 A-7+B-1 A-7+B-1 A-2+B-2 A-2+B-2 A-7+B-2 A-7+B-2 Dosage(g/10a) 20+0.6 10+0.6 20+0.6 10+0.6 20+4 10+4 20+4 10+4 Percent' of Weed Control(%) Galium aparine L. 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Stellaria media 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Viola arvensis 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Matricaria inodora 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Veronica 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 hederifolia Papaver rhoeas 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Aphanes arvensis 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Crop Injury Wheat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Example 6 Field test (post-emergence treatment test) Test zones having each plot of 2 m² were prepared and weed seeds of Digitalia sanguinalis , Xanthium strumarium , Ipomoea purpurea , Abutilon theophrasti , Portulaca oleracea , Solanum nigrum , Cassia obtusifolia L., and Amaranthus retroflexus and crop seeds of corn and sorghum were simultaneously planted. When weeds grew at the 2-3 leaf stage and corn and sorghum reached the 3-leaf stage, a given amount of a dilution of the herbicide obtained in Formulation Example 6 was uniformly sprayed onto the foliage at a spray volume corresponding to 20 liters/10 ares. The percent of weed control and the degree or crop injury were determined 30 days after spraying the chemical in a manner similar to Example 4. The results are shown in Table 9. Active ingredient A-2 + B-4 A-2 + B-4 A-7 + B-4 A-7 + B-4 Dosage(g/10a) 20+1 10+1 20+1 10+1 Percent of Weed Control(%) Digitalia sanguinalis 100 100 100 100 Xanthium strumarium 100 100 100 100 Ipomoea purpurea 100 100 100 100 Abutilon theophrasti 100 100 100 100 Portulaca oleracea 100 100 100 100 Solanum nigrum 100 100 100 100 Cassia obtusifolia L. 100 100 100 100 Amaranthus retroflexus 100 100 100 100 Crop Injury Corn 0 0 0 0 Sorghum 0 0 0 0 By the synergistic effect of the triazine derivative and sulfonylurea type herbicide as active ingredients, the herbicidal composition of the present invention show a high herbicidal effect at a low dosage and also have a wide herbicidal spectrum. Further, when the composition is used as a herbicide for field crops, the composition has flexibility of treatment to exhibit effectiveness, as compared to conventional herbicides for field crops. The composition also shows a high herbicidal activity even against troublesome weeds both by treatment to the soil at the pre- or post-emergence of weeds and by treatment to the foliage at the post-emergence of weeds. In addition, no crop injury is caused. In particular, the effect is markedly high in treatment to the soil or foliage treatment in fields where Gramineae crops grow. Further, when the present herbicide is used as a herbicide for paddy rice, it shows excellent herbicidal effect not only against annual weeds but also against perennial weeds.

Claims: A herbicidal composition comprising as active ingredient a triazine derivative represented by general formula [I]: wherein A represents wherein Z represents an oxygen atom or a sulfur atom, or wherein X² represents a methyl group or a fluorine atom and n represents 0 or an integer of 1 or 2; R¹ represents hydrogen atom or methyl group; and X¹ represents a fluorine atom or a chlorine atom and a sulfonylurea type herbicide represented by general formula [II]: wherein B represents wherein X³ represents a chlorine atom, CO₂CH₃, CO₂C₂H₅ or OCH₂CH₂Cl, wherein X⁴ represents CON(CH₃)₂ or CO₂C₂H₅, wherein R² represents a hydrogen atom or a methyl group, R³ and R⁴ each represent a methyl group, OCH₃ or OCHF₂, provided that R³ and R⁴ may be the same or different; Z² represents CH or a nitrogen atom, and m is 0 or 1. The herbicidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the triazine derivative represented by general formula [I] is a triazine derivative selected from the group consisting of 2-amino-4-[1-(benzofuran-2'-yl)ethylamino]-6-( α-fluoro,α-methylethyl)-s-triazine, 2-amino-4-[1-(benzofuran-2'-yl)ethylamino]-6-(α-fluoroethyl)-s-triazine, 2-amino-4-[1-(benzothiophen-2'-yl)ethylamino]-6-(α-fluoro,α-methylethyl)-s-triazine, 2-amino-4-(α-fluoro,α-methylethyl)-6-[2-(3',5'-dimethylphenoxy)-1- methylethylamino]-s-triazine, 2-amino-4-(α-fluoro,α-methylethyl)-6-[2-(3'fluorophenoxy)-1-methylethylamino]-s-triazine, 2-amino-4-(α-chloro,α-methylethyl)-6-[2-(3',5'-dimethylphenoxy)-1-methylethylamino]-s-triazine and 2-amino-4-(α-fluoro,α-methylethyl)-6-[2-(3',5'-dimethylphenoxy)-1-methylethylamino]-s-triazine. The herbicidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sulfonylurea type herbicide represented by general formula [II] is a sulfonylurea type herbicide selected from the group consisting of 2-chloro-N-[4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-aminocarbonyl]benzenesulfonamide, methyl 2-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-aminocarbonyl]-aminosulfonyl]benzoate, methyl 2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-3-methylureidosulfonyl]benzoate, methyl 3-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-aminocarbonyl]-aminosulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylate, 3-(6-methoxy-4-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-1-[2-(2-chloroethoxy)-phe nylsulfonyl]urea, methyl 2-[[(4,6-dimethyl-pyrimidin-2-yl) aminocarbonyl]-aminosulfonyl]benzoate, 2-[3-(4,6-bis(difluoromethoxy)-pyrimidin-2-yl)-ureidosulfonyl]benzoic acid methyl ester, 2-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl)-N,N-dimethylnicotinamide, 1-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2-pyridinylsulfonyl)urea, methyl 2-[[[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)aminocarbonyl]-aminosulfonyl]methyl]benzoate and ethyl 5-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl)-1-methylpyrazol-4-carboxylate.

Inventors: HIRATA TOSHIHIRO C O IDEMITSU, KIKKAWA NOBUYUKI C O IDEMITSU, KOBAYASHI IZUMI C O IDEMITSU K, TAKEMATSU TETSUO, HIRATA, TOSHIHIRO, C/O IDEMITSU KOSAN CO.LTD., KIKKAWA, NOBUYUKI, C/O IDEMITSU KOSAN CO.LTD., KOBAYASHI, IZUMI, C/O IDEMITSU KOSAN CO.LTD., TAKEMATSU, TETSUO
Applicants: IDEMITSU KOSAN CO, IDEMITSU KOSAN COMPANY LIMITED
Application year: 1991
Main classification: A01N43
IPC codes: A01N43, A01N47