1-alkyl-3-(acylamino)-epsilon-caprolactames as enhancers of learning and memory and pharmaceutical compositions containing same

Abstract: 1-alkyl-3-(acylamino)-ε-caprolactames of formula (1) wherein R is selected from the group consisting of: pyrrolidin-2-one-1-acetyl, p-methoxybenzoyl, N-benzyloxycarbonyl-(S)-prolyl, phenylbutanoyl, 3-trifluoromethylbenzoyl, 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl, nicotinoyl, and acyl having from 1 to 5 carbon atoms, and R₁ is selected from the group consisting of: hydrogen, methoxycarbonylmethyl, aminocarbonylmethyl, 2-hydroxyethyl, and formylmethyl, (provided that, if R₁ is hydrogen, R is not formyl or acetyl) are potent enhancers of learning and memory. Orally or parenterally administrable pharmaceutical compositions in unit dosage form comprise from about 100 to 500 mg of one of the compound of formula (1).

Description: The present invention relates to 3-(acylamino) and 1-alkyl-3-(acylamino)-ε-caprolactames of formula (1) wherein R is selected from the group consisting of: pyrrolidin-2-one-1-acetyl, p-methoxybenzoyl, N-benzyloxycarbonyl-(S)-prolyl, phenylbutanoyl, 3-trifluoromethylbenzoyl, 3,4,5-trimethoxbenzoyl, nicotinoyl, and acyl having from 1 to 5 carbon atoms, particularly formyl, and R₁ is selected from the group consisting of: hydrogen, methoxycarbonylmethyl, aminocarbonylmethyl, 2-hydroxyethyl, and formylmethyl, (provided that, if R₁ is hydrogen, R is not formyl or acetyl). The compounds (1) are potent enhancers of learning and memory. Because of the presence of a chiral carbon atom, the compounds (1) can exist as two enantiomorphs designated (R) and (S); although both stereoisomers are pharmacologically active, hereinbelow reference shall be made, for the sake of simplicity, to (S)-type structures. The present invention also relates to orally or parenterally administrable pharmaceutical compositions for enhancing learning and memory, comprising a novel compound of formula (1) as active ingredient. Structurally, the prior art compounds closest to the compounds of the present invention are 3-amino-ε-caprolactames which is a commercially available product utilized in the production of synthetic fibers and as solvent for high molecular weight polymers (The Merck Index, n° 1762, 11th edition, 1989) and 3-formylamino-ε-caprolactam described as precursor in the production of L-α-amino-ε-caprolactam via the microbiological process disclosed in the Japanese patent JP 63 28 35 91. Finally, 3-acetylamino-ε-caprolactam is disclosed as component of liquid detergents in the Japanese patent JP 58 37 097 and as reaction intermediate by ADAMCZESKI et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111 , 647-654. However, for these known compounds no pharmacological activity somehow related to the process of learning and memory has ever been disclosed to date. The known compounds that from a structural and pharmacological viewpoint are the closest ones to the compounds of general formula (1) are piracetam (see e.g. Curr. Dev. Psychopharmacol. 3 , 22, 1976) and oxiracetam (see e.g. Il Farmaco. Ed. Sc. 39 /1, 16, 1984). As illustrated hereinbelow, the compounds of the present invention are more potent that these known compounds. The compounds of formula (1) are prepared via process illustrated in the following synthesis scheme. 3-amino-ε-caprolactam is reacted in an anhydrous, inert organic solvent, such as acetonitrile or methylene chloride or in acetonitrile- H₂O mixture, at room temperature, for 10-24 hours, in equimolar amount with respect to an activated carboxylic acid (Y=COX wherein X represents an activating group) via a halogenating agent, such as thionyl chloride or oxalyl chloride, or a condensating agent, such as dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), carbonyldiimidazole (CDI), or 2-ethoxy-1-ethoxy-carbonyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ). The condensation product thus obtained is purified by crystallization or by silica gel chromatography. When R₁ is other than hydrogen, the compound of formula 1' is reacted with a halogen derivative (molar ratio 1:2) in an inert solvent, such as acetonitrile or tetrahydrofurane, in the presence of sodium or potassium hydride (molar ratios from 1:1 to 1:2) at room temperature or at the reflux temperature, from 2 to 24 hours, thus giving the compound (1). The following non-limiting examples illustrate the preparation of some of the compounds of formula (1). EXAMPLE 1 Preparation of (S)-3-(4-phenylbutanoylamino)-ε-caprolactam (ST 707). CDI (3,891 g; 24 mmoles) was added to 4-phenylbutyric acid (3.284 g; 20 mmoles) in CH₂Cl₂ (100 mL) and the resulting solution was kept under stirring for 30 minutes at room temperature. (S)-3-amino-ε-caprolactam (2.563 g; 20 mmoles) was added and the resulting solution was kept under stirring for 24 hours at room temperature. The organic phase was washed with 1N NaOH (3 X 30 mL), 1N HCl (3 X 30 mL), H₂O and NaCl saturated solution, and dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The solvent was evaporated and 5 g of product were obtained. Yield = 90 % M.P. = 106-108° C [α] 25 / D =+ 10.2° MeOH (C=1) TLC on silica gel, eluant Et OAc R F = 0.28 Elementary analysis for C₁₆H₂₂N₂O₂ Calculated C 70.04 H 8.08 N 10.21 Found C 69.94 H 8.43 N 10.16 ¹H NMR (CDCl₃):δ7.3-7.15(m,5H, aromatic), 6.9(br d,1H,-CH NH CO-),6.55(br t,1H,-CH₂ NH CO-), 4.5(m,1H,- CH NCO-),3.35-3.15(m,2H,- CH ₂NCO),2.62(t,2H,- CH ₂Ph),2.22(t,2H,-NCO CH ₂CH₂-),2.1-1.66(m,6H,- CH ₂-CH₂ CH ₂CHNCOCH₂ CH ₂-),1.55-1.28(m,2H,-CH₂ CH ₂CH₂CHNCO-) HPLC µBondapack 18 Length = 300 mm Inner Diameter = 3.9 mm Size = 10 µm Eluant CH₃CN/KH₂PO₄ 0.05M (30:70) Flow rate = 1 mL/min. Retention time = 11.03 min. EXAMPLE 2 Preparation of (S)-1-(methoxycarbonylmethyl)-3-(4-phenylbutanoylamino)-ε-caprolactam (ST 740). To a solution of ST 707 (prepared as shown in Example 1) (1.5 g; 5.46 mmoles) and BrCH₂COOCH₃ (1.672 g; 10.92 mmoles) in CH₃CN (80 mL), 80% NaH in mineral oil (372.82 mg; 10.92 mmoles) was added in two aliquots over one hour. The resulting mixture was kept under stirring at room temperature for 24 hours and then filtered. The filtrate, brought to dryness, was chromatographed on silica gel using EtOAc as eluant. 1.4 g of an oily product were obtained. Yield = 74% [α] 25 / D = -9.7° MeOH (C=1) TLC = silica gel Eluant EtOAc R F = 0.55 Elementary analysis for C₁₉H₂₆N₂O₄ Calculated C 65.87 H 7.56 N 8.08 Found C 65.2 H 7.89 N 8.40 ¹HNMR (CDCl₃):δ7.3-7.15(m,5H, aromatic), 6.9(br d,1H,-CH NH CO-),4.72-4.62(m,1H,- CH NCO-),4.18(s,2H,-N CH ₂CO-),3.78-3.65(m,4H,- OCH ₃,-CH H NCO-),3.25-3.15(m,1H,-C H HNCO-),2.65(t,2H,- CH ₂Ph),2.2(t,2H,-NCO CH ₂CH₂-),2.1-1.75(m,6H,- CH ₂CH₂ CH ₂CHNCOCH₂ CH ₂-),1.7-1.45(m,2H,-CH₂ CH ₂CH₂CHN-) HPLC LiCHROSORB-RP8 Length = 250 mm Inner Diameter = 4 mm size = 5 µm Eluant = CH₃CN/KH₂PO₄ 0.025 M (40:60) Flow rate = 1 mL/min. Retention time = 4.18 min. EXAMPLE 3 Preparation of (S)-1-(aminocarbonylmethyl)-3-(4-phenylbutanoylamino)-ε-caprolactam (ST 741). Gaseous NH₃ was bubbled for 30 minutes into a solution of ST 740 (1.6 g; 4.62 mmoles) in MeOH (50 mL) cooled with an ice bath. The solution was kept under stirring at room temperature for 24 hours, the solvent was evaporated and the residue chromatographed on silica gel using EtOAc-MeOH (9:1) as eluant. 1.3 g of product were obtained. Yiled = 85% M.P. = 153-155°C [α] 25 / D =+8.2° MeOH (C=0.5) TLC on silica gel: eluant EtOAc-MeOH (9:1) R F =0.3 Elementary analysis for C₁₈H₂₅N₃O₃ Calculated C 65.23 H 7.60 N 12.68 Found 64.81 H 7.79 N 12.34 ¹HNMR (CDCl₃):δ7.31-7.13(m,5H, aromatic), 6.87(br d,1H,-CH NH CO-),6.42(br s,-CONH H ),5.89(br s,1H, -CON H H),4.76-4.66(m,1H, -C H NCO-),4.29(d,1H,-NC H HCON-),3.82(d,1H,-NCH H CON-),3.76-3.64(m,1H,CH₂CH H NCO-),3.35-3.24(m,1H, -CH₂CH H NCO-),2.63(t,2H,- CH ₂Ph),2.2(t,2H,-NCO CH ₂CH₂-),2.08-1.74(m,6H,- CH ₂CH₂ CH ₂CHNCOCH₂ CH ₂-),1.58-1.38(m,2H,- CH ₂CH₂CHN-) HPLC LiCROSORB-RP8 Length =250 mm Inner Diameter = 4mm size = 5µm Eluant = CH₃CN/H₂O (30:70) Flow rate = 1 mL/min. Retention time = 5.00 min EXAMPLE 4 Preparation of (S)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-(4-phenylbutanoylamino)-ε-caprolactam (ST 747) NaBH₄ (402 mg; 10.7 mmoles) was added to ST 740 (1 g; 2.88 mmoles) in tert-butyl alcohol (18 mL), the temperature was brought to 80° C and MeOH (3 mL) was slowly added. The resulting mixture was kept at the reflux temperature for 2 hours and then cooled to room temperature. Following cooling with an ice bath, H₂O was added and the alcohols were evaporated under vacuum, the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc and the solvent was evaporated. The residue was chomatographed on silica gel using EtOAc-MeOH (9:1) as eluant. 530 mg of an oily product were obtained. Yield = 57 % [α] 25 / D = -1° MeOH (C=2.2) TLC on silica gel; eluant EtOAc-MeOH (9:1) R F = 0.4 Elementary analysis for C₁₈H₂₆N₂O₃ Calculated C 67.89 H 8.23 N 8.79 Found C 67.40 H 8.34 N 8.34 ¹HNMR (CDCl₃):δ7.32-7.14(m,5H, aromatic), 6.82(br d,1H,-CH NH CO-),4.7-4.6(m,1H,- CH NHCO-),3.82-3.48(m,5H-CH H N CH ₂ CH ₂OH),3.38-3.26(m,1H,-C H HNCH₂OH),2.8(br s,1H, - OH ),2.64(t,2H, - CH ₂Ph)2.23(t,2H,-NCO CH ₂CH₂-), 2.08-1.76(m,6H,- CH ₂CH₂ CH ₂CHNCOCH₂ CH ₂-),1.54-1.36(m,2H,- CH ₂CH₂CHN-) HPLC µBondapack C₁₈ Length=300 mm Inner Diameter = 3.9 mm size = 10µm Eluant = KH₂PO₄ 0.05 M/CH₃CN (70:30) Flow rate = 1 mL/min. Retention time = 11.62 min. EXAMPLE 5 Preparation of (S)-1-(formylmethyl)-3-(phenylbutanoylamino)-ε-caprolactam (ST 800). To a suspension of KH (35% in mineral oil, 3.726 g 32 mmoles) (washed with pentane) in THF (90 mL) a solution of ST 707 ( 6 g, 21 mmoles) in THF (90 mL) was added dropwise. The resulting mixture was kept at the reflux temperature until the hydrogen development was over. Bromoacetaldehyde dimethyl acetal (7.38 g; 43 mmoles) was added dropwise and the resulting mixture was kept at the reflux temperature overnight. The mixture was evaporated under vacuum, a NH₄Cl saturated solution (200 mL) was added thereto, the resulting mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3 X 70 mL) and the organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The residue obtained following solvent evaporation was chromatographed on silica gel using EtOAc-Hexane (95:5) as eluant. 4 g of (S)-1-(2,2-dimethoxyethyl)-3-(phenylbutanoylamino)-ε-caprolactam were obtained (TLC silica gel, EtOAc, R F = 0.5) which were dissolved in CH₃CN (100 mL) and H₂O (100 mL). Trifluoroacetic acid (2 mL) was added and the solution was kept under stirring at room temperature overnight. CH₃CN was evaporated under vacuum and the residue extracted with CHCl₃(3 X 50 mL). The organic phase was washed with a NaCl solution, dehydrated over Na₂SO₄ and evaporated. 2.3 g of the product were obtained. Yield = 67% [α] 25 / D = +0.9° CHCl₃ (C=1) TLC on silica gel; eluant EtOAC R F = 0.31 Elementary analysis for C₁₈H₂₄N₂O₃ Calculated C 68.33 H 7.64 N 8.85 Found C 68.37 H 7.59 N 8.66 ¹HNMR (CDCl₃):δ9.55(s,1H,-C H O),7.30-7.15(m,5H, aromatic), 6.90(br d,1H, - N HCO-),4.75-4.65(m,1H,-C H NHCO-),4.25(dd,2H,-NC H ₂CHO),3.80-3.65(m,1H,-C H HNCO-),3.15-3.05(m,1H,-CH H NCO-)-2.62(t,2H,- CH ₂-Ph),2.22(t,2H-NCO CH ₂CH₂-),2.10-1.75(m,6H,- CH ₂CH₂ CH ₂CHNCOCH₂- CH ₂),1.65-1.45(m,2H,- CH ₂CH₂CHNCO-) EXAMPLE 6 Preparation of (S)-3-[(pyrrolidin-2-one-1-yl)acetylamino]-ε-caprolactam (ST 721). To (pyrrolidin-2-one-1-yl)acetic acid (1.43 g; 10 mmoles) in CH₂Cl₂ (50 mL), CDI (1.96 g; 12 mmoles) was added under stirring and after 30 minutes (S)-3-amino-ε-caprolactam (1.28 g; 10 mmoles) was added. The reaction mixture was kept under stirring at room temperature for 24 hours. To the resulting mixture Et₂O was added under stirring and by filtration under vacuum 2 g of product were obtained which was further purified by crystallization from CH₃CN furnishing 1.3 g of product (yield on the crystallized product 50 %). M.P. = 245-247° C [α] 25 / D = +7.1° MeOH (C=1) TLC on silica gel; eluant EtOAc-MeOH (7:3) R F = 0.43 Elementary analysis for C₁₂H₁₉N₃O₃ Calculated C 56.9 H 7.5 N 16.5 Found C 57.07 H 7.95 N 16.94 ¹HNMR (D₂0):δ4.65(m,1H,- CH NHCO),4.05(s,2H,-CO CH ₂NCH₂-),3.5(t,2H,-COCH₂N CH ₂-),3.4-3.2(m,2H, CH ₂NHCO-),2.5(t,2H,-CH₂NCO CH ₂-),2.20-1.60(m,6H,- CH ₂CH₂ CH ₂CHN-,- CH ₂CH₂CON-),1.45-1.30(m,2H,- CH ₂CH₂CHN-). HPLC Partisil 10 scx Length= 250 mm Inner Diameter = 4.6 mm Eluant = CH₃CN/KH₂PO₄ 0.05 M (65:35) Flow rate = 1 mL/min. Retention time = 4.15 min. EXAMPLE 7 Preparation of (S)-3-(benzyloxycarbonyl)-(S)-prolylamino)-ε-caprolactam (ST 725). EEDQ (3.45 g; 13.95 mmoles) was added under stirring to (S)-benzyloxycarbonyl prolin (2.9 g; 11.63 mmoles) in CH₃CN (100mL) and after 30 minutes (S)-3-amino-ε-caprolactam was added (1.49 g; 11.63 mmoles). The reaction mixture was kept a room temperature for 24 hours: the solvent was evaporated under vacuum and the residue chromatographed on silica gel using EtOAc as eluant. 2.9 g of product were obtained. Yield = 70 % M.P. = 156-158° C [α] 25 / D = -69.7° MeOH (C=1) TLC on silica gel; eluant EtOAc R F =0.23 Elementary analysis for C₁₉H₂₅N₃O₄ Calculated C 63.49 H 7.01 N 11.69 Found C 63.13 H 7.25 N 12.10 ¹HNMR(CDCl₃):δ7.5-7.2(m,6H,aromatic,-CH₂ NH CO-),6.65(br,1H, -CH NH CO-),5.25-5.05(m,2H,-O CH ₂Ph),4.55-4.20(m,2H,-NCO CH NCO-, - CH NCOO-)3.7-3.42(m,2H,- CH ₂NCOO-),3.35-2.15(m,2H,- CH ₂NHCO-),2.25-1.7(m,8H,- CH ₂CH₂ CH ₂CH-,- CH ₂ CH ₂CHN-),1.6-1.2(m,2H, -CH₂CH₂ CH ₂CH₂CH-). HPLC µ Bondapack C₁₈ Length = 300 mm Inner Diameter = 3.9 mm size = 10 µm Eluant = KH₂PO₄ 0.05 M/CH₃CN (80:20) Flow rate = 1.5 mL/min. Retention time = 19.46 min. EXAMPLE 8 Preparation of (S)-3-(4-methoxybenzoylamino)-ε-caprolactam (ST 734). CDI (1.96 g; 12 mmoles) was added under stirring to 4-methoxybenzoic acid (1.52 g; 10 mmoles) in CH₂Cl₂ (50 mL) and after 30 minutes (S)-3-amino-ε--caprolactam (1.28 g, 10 mmoles) was added. The reaction mixture was kept under stirring at room temperature for 24 hours, the solvent was evaporated and the residue chromatographed on silica gel using EtOAc-MeOH as eluant (9:1). The solid thus obtained was taken up with CH₂Cl₂ e precipitated with Et₂O obtaining 1.3 g of product. Yield = 50 % M.P. = 170-172° C [α] 25 / D =+42.2° MeOH (C=1) TLC on silica gel; eluant EtOAc R F = 0.3 Elementary analysis for C₁₄H₁₈N₂O₃ Calculated C 64.10 H 6.91 N 10.68 Found C 64.51 H 6.99 N 10.50 ¹HNMR(CDCl₃):δ7.82(d,2H,aromatic),7.58(br d,1H,-CH NH CO-), 6.93(d,2H,aromatic),6.58(br t, 1H,-CH₂ NH CO-),4.76-466(m,1H,- CH NCO-), 3.85(s,3H-O CH ₃),3.42-3.22(m,2H, CH ₂NCO-),2.3-2.18(m,1H,-CH H CHN-),2.1-1.82(m,3H,- CH ₂CH₂C H HCHN-),1.64-1.35(m,2H,- CH ₂CH₂CHNCO-). HPLC µ Bondapack C₁₈ Length = 300 mm Inner Diameter = 3.9 mm Size = 10 µm Eluant = KH₂PO₄ 0.05/CH₃CN (60:40) Flow rate = 1 mL/min. Retention time = 4.9 min. EXAMPLE 9 Preparation of (S)-3-(3-trifluoromethylbenzoylamino)-ε-caprolactam (ST 796). CDI (2.81 g, 17.36 mmoles) was added to trifluoromethylbenzoic acid (3 g, 15,78 mmoles) in CH₂Cl₂ (60 mL). The solution was kept under stirring for 30 minutes at room temperature and (S)-3-amino-ε-caprolactam (2.02 g, 15.78 mmoles) was added. After 24 hours the resulting mixture was taken up with CHCl₃ (50 mL), the organic phase was washed with HCl 1N(3 X 30 mL), NaOH 1N (3 X 30 mL), H₂O, NaCl saturated solution and then dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The residue obtained by evaporation of the solvent was chromatographed on silica gel using EtOAc-MeOH as eluant (ratio 8:2) yielding 3.5 g of product. Yield = 74 % M.P. = 218-219° C [α] 25 / D = +26.9° MeOH (C=1) TLC on silica gel; eluant EtOAc-MeOH 95:5 R F = 0.5 Elementary analysis for C₁₄H₁₅F₃N₂O₂ Calculated C 55.99 H5.03 N 9.33 Found C 56.09 H 5.03 N 9.53 ¹HNMR(CDCl₃/DMSO-d₆):δ8.15(s,1H,aromatic),8.05(d,1H,aromatic), 7.9(br,1H,- HN COPh),7.78(d,1H,aromatic),7.6(m,1H,aromatic),7.6(m,1H, aromatic),7.35(br,1H,-CH₂ NH CO-),4.75-4.65(m,1H,- CH NCO-),3.40-3.22(m,2H,- CH ₂NCO-),2.25-2.15(m,1H,-C H HCHN-),2.12-2.02(m,1H,-CH H CHN-),1.98-1.8(m,2H, CH ₂CH₂CH₂CHN-),1.67-1.35(m,2H, - CH ₂CH₂CHN-) HPLC Lichrosorb RP-18 Length= 250 mm Inner Diameter= 4 mm size= 10 µm Eluant = KH₂PO₄ 0.05 M/CH₃CN (80:20) Flow rate = 1 mL/min. Retention time = 18.59 min. EXAMPLE 10 Preparation of (S)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoylamino)-ε-caprolactam (ST 819). CDI (3.96 g, 24.44 mmoles) was added to 3,4,5,-trimethoxybenzoic acid (4 g, 18.8 mmoles) in CH₂Cl₂ (60 mL). The solution was kept under stirring for 30 minutes at room temperature and (S)-3-amino-ε-caprolactam (2.41 g, 18.8 mmoles) was added. After 24 hours the resulting mixture was taken up with CHCl₃ (50 mL), the organic phase was washed with HCl 1N (3 X 30 mL), NaOH 1N (3 X 30 mL), H₂O, NaCl saturated solution and dried on anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The evaporation residue was chromatographed on silica gel using EtOAc-MeOH as eluant (ratio 95:5) giving thus 3.1 g of product. Yield = 51 % M.P. = 95-97° C [α] 25 / D = +35.7° MeOH (C=0.9) TLC on silica gel; eluant EtOAC-MeOH 95:5 R F = 0.28 Elementary analysis for C₁₆H₂₂N₂O₅ Calculated C 59.61 H 6.88 N 8.69 Found C 59.10 H 7.17 N 8.48 1HNMR(CDCl₃):δ7.65(br,1H,- HN COPh-),7.10(s,2H,aromatic),6.75(br,1H, -CH₂ NH CO-),4.78-4.68(m,1H,- CH NCO-),3.94(s,6H,2m- OCH ₃),3.88(s,3H,p- OCH ₃),3.42-3.22(m,2H,- CH ₂NHCO-),2.28-2.19(m,1H,-C H HCHN-),2.12-2.02(m,1H,-CH H CHN-),2.0-1.82(m,2H,- CH ₂CH₂CH₂CHN-),1.65-1.35(m,2H,- CH ₂CH₂CHN-). HPLC Lichrosorb RP - 18 Length = 250 mm Inner Diameter = 4 mm size = 10 µm Eluant = KH₂PO₄ 0.05 M/CH₃CN (70:30) Flow rate = 1 mL/min. Retention time = 5.96 min. EXAMPLE 11 Preparation of (S)-3-(nicotinoylamino)-ε-caprolactam (ST 807). EEDQ (7.52 g, 30.4 mmoles), (S)-3-amino-ε-caprolactam (3 g, 23.4 mmoles), and H₂O were added to nicotinic acid (2.28 g, 23.4 mmoles) in CH₃CN until complete solubilization. After stirring overnight at room temperature the solvents were evaporated, the residue was taken up with CHCl₃ and Et₂O was added under stirring until complete precipitation. The solid residue obtained by filtration (3.5 g) was further purified by chromatography on silica gel using EtOAc-MeOH as eluant (8:2). 3.15 g of product were obtained. Yield = 57 % M.P. = 177 ° C [α] 25 / D = +88° CHCl₃ (C=1) TLC on silica gel; eluant EtOAc-MeOH 8:2 R F = 0.38 Elementary analysis for C₁₂H₁₅N₃O₂ Calculated C 61.79 H 6.48 N 18.01 Found C 61.36 H 6.49 N 17.95 ¹HNMR(CDCl₃):δ9.08(m,1H,aromatic),8.75(m,1H,aromatic),8.15(m,1H, aromatic),7.75(br,1H,-CH NH CO-),7.40(m,1H,aromatic),6.40(br,1H, -CH₂ NH CO-),4.76-4.68(m,1H,- CH NCO-),3.42-3.22(m,2H,- CH ₂NCO-), 2.30-2.21(m,1H,-CH H CHN-),2.13-2.01(m,-C H HCHN-),2.0-1.78(m,2H, - CH ₂CH₂CH₂CHN-),1.65-1.38(m,1H,- CH ₂CH₂CHN-). HPLC µ Bondapack NH2 Length = 300 mm Inner Diameter = 3.9 mm Size = 10 µm Eluant = CH₃CN/KH₂PO₄ O.O5M (65:35) Flow rate = 1 mL/min. Retention time = 3.3 min. EXAMPLE 12 Preparation of (S)-1-(methoxycarbonylmethyl)-3-formylamino-ε-caprolactam (ST 919). The title compound was prepared as described in Example 2, using (S)-3-formylamino-3-ε-caprolactam as starting compound. Yield = 70% M.P. = 60-62°C [α] 25 / D = +1.2° MeOH (C=1) TLC on silica gel; eluant EtOAc R F = 0.24 Elementary analysis for C₁₀H₁₆N₂O₄ Calculated C 52.62 H 7.06 N 12.27 Found C 52.25 H 7.05 N 11.92 ¹HNMR(CDCl₃):δ8.15(s,1H,-N CH O),7.10(br s,1H,- NH CHO),4.78-4.68(m,1H,- CH NCO-),4.18(s,2H,-N CH ₂CO-),3.78-3.62(m,4H,-O CH ₃,-CH₂CH H NCO-), 3.25-3.15(m,1H,-CH₂ CH HNCO-),2.15-1.48(m,6H,- CH ₂ CH ₂ CH ₂CHN-) HPLC µ Bondapack -C18 Length = 300 mm Inner Diameter = 3.9 mm Size = 10 µm Eluant = KHPO₄ 0.05M/CH₃CN (80:20) Flow rate = 1 mL/min. Retention time = 5.51 min. EXAMPLE 13 Preparation of (S)-1-(aminocarbonylmethyl)-3-formylamino-ε-caprolactam (ST 893). The title compound was prepared as described in Example 3 by substituting ST 919 (see Example 12) for ST 740 as starting compound. As chromatography eluant, EtOAc-MeOH (7:3) was used. Yield = 80% M.P. = 208-210° C [α] 25 / D = +12.4° MeOH (C = 0.5) TLC on silica gel; eluant EtOAc MeOH 7:3 R F = 0.46 Elementary analysis C₁₉H₁₅N₃O₃ Calculated C 50.65 H 7.09 N 19.70 Found C 50.32 H 6.85 N 19.29 ¹HNMR(D₂O):δ 8.08(s,1H,-N CH O),4.9(m,1H,- CH NCO),4.39(d,J=16.6Hz,1H, -NCH H CON-),3.98(d,J=16.6Hz,1H,-N CH HCON),3.85-3.75(m,1H,-CH₂CH H NCO-),3.42-3.3(m,1H,-CH₂C H HNCO-),2.05-1.48(m,6H,- CH ₂ CH ₂ CH ₂CHN-) HPLC µ Bondapack-NH₂ Length = 300 mm Inner Diameter = 3.9 mm Size = 10µm Eluant = CH₃CN/KH₂PO₄ 0.05M PH = 6.5 conKOH Flowrate= 1 mL/min. Retention time = 3.95 min. EXAMPLE 14 Preparation of (S)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-formylamino-ε-caprolactam (ST 920). The title compound was prepared as described in Example 4 by substituting ST 919 (see Example 12) for ST 740. Water was added to the reaction mixture, the alcohols were evaporated under vacuum, the aqueous phase was washed with EtOAc and evaporated to dryness under vacuum. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel using EtOAC-MeOH (95:5) as eluant. Yield = 55% M.P. = 89-92° C [α] 25 / D = +6.5° MeOH (C = 0.5) TLC on silica gel; eluant EtOAc-MeOH 9:1 R F = 0.33 Elementary analysis for C₉H₁₆N₂O₃ Calculated C 53.98 H 8.05 N 13.99 Found C 53.64 H 7.88 N 13.58 ¹HNMR(CDCl₃):δ8.1(s,1H,-N CH O),7.1(br s,1H,- NH CHO-),4.84-4.65(m,1H, - CH NCO-),3.9-3.45(m,5H,-C H HN CH ₂ CH ₂OH),3.4-3.26(m,1H,-CH H NCH₂CH₂OH),2.85(br s,1H, OH ),2.14-1.76(m,4H,- CH ₂CH₂ CH ₂CHN-), 1.58-1.36(m,2H,-CH₂ CH ₂CH₂CHN-) HPLC µ Bondapack-NH₂ Length = 300 mm Inner Diameter = 3.9 mm Size = 10 µm Eluant = CH₃CN/KH₂PO₄ 0.05M (65:35) Flow rate = 1 mL/min. Retention time = 3.57 min. EXAMPLE 15 Preparation of (R)-3-(3-trifluoromethylbenzoylamino)-ε-caprolactam (ST 837). The title compound was prepared as described in Example 9 by substituting (R)-3-amino-ε-caprolactam for (S)-3-amino-ε-caprolactam as starting compound. [α] 25 / D = -26.3° MeOH (C = 1) Other physico-chemical characteristics identical to those of ST 796 (see example 9). The activity of the compounds of the invention was assessed in several pharmacological tests. Some of these tests wherein piracetam was used as reference standard are illustrated hereinbelow. (A) Assessment of the antiamnesic activity. In order to assess the antiamnesic activity the passive avoidance test in mice was used. Amnesia was brought about by administration of scopolamine (cfr. Bammer, Pharmacological investigations of neurotransmitter involvement in passive avoidance responding: a review and some new results. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. , 6 (3) 247-296, 1982); or by electroconvulsive shock (ECS) (cfr. Bammer et al., A screening method for substances potentially active on learning and memory. J. Pharmacol. Methods Vol.: 8 (4) 255-263, 1982). Male CDI mice (Charles River - Italy) wheighing 25-26 g were used for the scopolamine-induced amnesia test. Male CDI mice (Charles River - Germany) fed on a normal diet, were used for the ECS-induced amnesia test. The compounds were administered i.p.; 0.9 mg/kg in the scopolamine-induced amnesia test; and 9 and 0.9 mg/kg in the ECS-induced amnesia test. All doses were equimolar to piracetam. The compounds were dissolved in saline. The apparatus for passive avoidance conditioning was a black plastic chamber (42 X 42 cm, height 40 cm) provided with a floor constructed of metal rods that could be electrified. From the front wall extended a white runway, 30 cm long and 10 cm wide provided with side walls 12 cm high, which led into the box through a guillotine door. The runway was lightened by a 60 W lamp (cfr. Ader et al., Retention of passive avoidance response as a function of the intensity and duration of electric shock. Psychon. Sci. , 26 (3), 125-127, 1972). Passive avoidance following scopolamine-induced amnesia . The animals were administered the compounds and scopolamine (1.5 mg/kg s.c.) 30 minutes and 15 minutes, respectively, before the test and were then placed on the runway. After one minute of adaptation, the door was raised and the time employed by the animal to enter the darkened box with all four feet, was recorded. Upon entry, the guillotine door was lowered and three seconds thereafter the rods were electrified, 0.21 mA for 2 seconds. Immediately thereafter the animal was placed in the housing cage. Retention was assessed 24 hours later by placing the animal on the runway and again evaluating the latency in entering the chamber, using an endpoint of 300 s (cfr. Bammer, loc. cit.). In each experiment, two groups of animals in addition to the treated ones were used, that were defined as follows: (1) ceiling control animals (treated with placebo and not subjected to amnesia treatment with scopolamine or ECS) to ensure that these animals not treated with the amnesia agent remembered the task; (2) base-line control animals (treated with placebo and subjected to amnesia treatment with scopolamine or ECS) to ensure that ECS or scopolamine produced amnesia in the animals not treated with the compounds of the present invention. The results of each compound under examination were expressed as percentage of amnesia reversal (AR) in order to make comparisons across the tested compounds. AR is defined as follows: wherein CI, comparison index (the subscripts "t" and "c" refer to "treated" and "ceiling control", respectively) is defined by the formula CI = [ΣAij / Ni.Nj)] 100 wherein Ni is the number of animals belonging to the i-nth group (ceiling control or treated animals); Nj is the number of animals belonging to the j-nth group (base-line control animals), and Aij is a binary function that can take only the values +1, 0 or -1 depending on whether the latency time (in seconds) of an animal belonging to the i-nth group, Xi, is higher than, the same as or smaller than the latency time (in seconds) of an animal of the j-nth group, Xj. The sum ΣAij encompasses all the possible paira obtained by combining each term Xi with each term Xj. Whenever in performing the test the comparison index (CI) between ceiling control animals and base-line control animals, generally expected to range between 60 and 80%, turned out to be lower than 40%, the data for the whole experiment were discarded. The results are shown in Table 1. In particular, at the dose of 0.9 mg/kg, the amnesia reversal of ST 796 and ST 800 was 65% and 64% respectively. ST 734 and ST 893 showed to be inactive. ARs of Piracetam, ST 725 and ST 837 were 19%, 29% and 75%, respectively. Passive avoidance following ECS-induced amnesia. 30 minutes following treatment with the compounds, the animals were placed on the runway. After one minute of adaptation, the door was raised and the time employed by the animal to enter the darkened box with all four feet, was recorded. Upon entry, the guillotine door was lowered and three seconds thereafter the rods were electrified, 0.24 mA for 2 seconds. The mouse was then removed from the chamber and immediately administered an electroshock delivered through spring clips attached to the ears (square wave, intensity 20 mA, amplitude 0.6 msec, duration 0.5 s, frequency 50 Hz). Retention was assessed 24 hours later by placing the animal on the runway and again evaluating the latency in entering the chamber, using an end-point of 300 seconds (Bammer, loc. cit.). In each experiment, two groups of animals (a ceiling control group and a base-line control goup) in addition to the treated animals were used, as previously described. The results for each compound under examination were expressed as amnesia reversal (AR) in such a way as to make comparisons across the tested compounds. Amnesia reversal was assessed by using the comparison index (CI), calculated according to the formula previously given. The results obtained are shown in table 2. In particular, at the dose of 9 mg/kg piracetam and ST 837 are inactive, ST 725 and ST 893 exhibit 12% and 9%, respectively, of amnesia reversal; ST 734, ST 796 and ST 800 exhibit 37%, 35% and 38%, respectively, of amnesia reversal. At the lower dose, i.e. 0.9 mg/kg, ST 734 and ST 796 are still active, exhibiting 37% amnesia reversal; at this dose, besides piracetam, also ST 725 and ST 800 are inactive. Surprisingly, at this dose, ST 893 and ST 837 turned out to be active, exhibiting 55% and 21%, respectively, of amnesia reversal. (B) Behavioural profile. The behavioural profile was assessed in male CDI mice (Charles River, Italy) weighing 22-24 g, using the Irwin test (IRWIN S., Drug screening and evaluation procedures. 136 , 123-128, 1962). The animals had been caged under normal conditions and kept fasting for the last 18 hours. Following administration of the compounds, the behaviour of the animals was monitored for 6 hours. The compounds were suspended in 10% arabic gum and orally administered at doses equimolar to 90, 23, 5.4 and 1.4 mg piracetam/10 mL/kg of body weight. The animals of the control groups were administered 10% arabic gum (10 mL/kg, orally). No compound altered, at the tested doses, the behavioural profile. (C) Analgesic activity. The analgesic activity was assessed in CDI mice (Charles River, Italy) weighing 22-24 g, utilizing the hot plate test (56 °C). The animals, kept under normal caging conditions and kept fasting for 18 hours, were placed on the hot plate for 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes following the administration of 90, 23, 5.4 and 1.4 mg/10 mL/kg of each compound under examination. The analgesic activity was assessed by measuring the increase (in seconds) of the time the animals continued to stay on the hot plate. None of the tested compounds was shown to possess analgesic activity. The compounds of the present invention can be formulated into orally or parenterally administrable pharmaceutical compositions. Suitable excipient and compositions for tablets, vials and the like are illustrated in the Canadian patent 1.100.515. Pharmaceutical compositions in unit dosage form comprise between about 100 and about 500 mg of active ingredient.

Claims: 3-(acylamino) and 1-alkyl-3-(acylamino)-ε-caprolactames of formula (1) wherein R is selected from the group consisting of: pyrrolidin-2-one-1-acetyl, p-methoxybenzoyl, N-benzyloxycarbonyl-(S)-prolyl, phenylbutanoyl, 3-trifluoromethylbenzoyl, 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl, nicotinoyl, and acyl having from 1 to 5 carbon atoms, particularly formyl, and R₁ is selected from the group consisting of: hydrogen, methoxycarbonylmethyl, aminocarbonylmethyl, 2-hydroxyethyl, and formylmethyl, provided that, if R₁ is hydrogen, R is not formyl or acetyl. A compound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is hydrogen and R is phenylbutanoyl. A compound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is methoxy carbonylmethyl and R is phenylbutanoyl. A compound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is amino carbonyl methyl and R is phenylbutanoyl. A compound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is hydroxyethyl and R is phenylbutanoyl. A compound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is formylmethyl and R is phenylbutanoyl. A coumpound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is H and R is pyrrolidin-2-one-1-acetyl. A compound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is H and R is N-benzilorycarbonyl-(S)-prolyl. A compound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is H and R is p-methoxy benzoyl. A compound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is H and R is 3-trifluoromethylbenzoyl. A compound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is H and R is 3,4,5-trimethoxy benzoyl. A compound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is H and R is nicotinoyl. A compound according to claim 1, wherein R₁ is aminocarbonylmethyl and R is formyl. An orally or parenterally administrable pharmaceutical composition for enhancing learning and memory which comprises as active ingredient a 3-(acylamino) or 1-alkyl-3-(acylamino)-ε-caprolactam of formula (1) wherein R is selected from the group consisting of: pyrrolidin-2-one-1-acetyl, p-methoxybenzoyl N-benzyloxycarbonyl-(S)-prolyl, phenylbutanoyl, 3-trifluoromethylbenzoyl, 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl nicotinoyl, and acyl having from 1 to 5 carbon atoms, particularly formyl, and R₁ is selected from the group consisting of: hydrogen, methoxycarbonylmethyl, aminocarbonylmethyl, 2-hydroxyethyl, and formylmethyl, provided that, if R₁ is hydrogen, R is not formyl or acetyl, and a pharmacologically acceptable excipient therefor. The pharmaceutical composition according to claim 13 in unit dosage form, which comprises from about 100 to about 500 mg of a compound of formula (1).

Inventors: COZZOLINO ROBERTO, GHIRARDI ORLANDO, GIANNESSI FABIO, MISITI DOMENICO, SCOLASTICO CARLO, TINTI MARIA ORNELLA, COZZOLINO, ROBERTO, GHIRARDI, ORLANDO, GIANNESSI, FABIO, MISITI, DOMENICO, SCOLASTICO, CARLO, TINTI, MARIA ORNELLA
Applicants: SIGMA TAU IND FARMACEUTI, SIGMA-TAU INDUSTRIE FARMACEUTICHE RIUNITE S.P.A.
Application year: 1991
Main classification: C07D223
IPC codes: A61P25, C07D403, C07D401, C07D223, A61K31