Optical imaging device

Abstract: An optical imaging device (10) for projecting an image in a strip area, comprising a reflecting plate (1) having a plurality of pairs of reflecting surfaces arranged on a flat surface and forming an array in a first direction parallel to a long direction of a strip image, and at least one cylindrical focusing lens (4) or mirror having a focusing power direction only to a second direction perpendicular to the first direction. The pair of reflecting surfaces is composed of two flat surfaces which cross at about a π/2 radian, and the crossing line of two adjacent reflecting surfaces is perpendicular to the first direction. The reflecting plate (1) projects the image component in parallel to the first direction and the cylindrical focusing lens (4) or mirror projects an image component perpendicular to the first direction. The resolving power in the first direction of the obtained image is determined by the pitch length of the pair of reflecting surfaces.

Description: The present invention relates to an optical imaging device having a short focal length and transmitting an strip image,' and particularly, to an optical imaging device applicable to a facsimile, an electrophotographic copier, a LED printer and so forth. The ongoing widespread use of facsimiles, electrophotographic copiers and LED printers has led to a demand for miniaturizing of these machines, but in such machines, since a total image is produced by scanning, an optical imaging device can transmit only a strip area of the image, at an image magnification of 1 in most cases, and therefore, a composite optical imaging device, which is an array of many small optical projecting devices arranged in the direction of the image strip is used. Each of the small optical imaging devices produces a small erect equal-magnification image on the image plane, and each small image partially overlaps the adjacent small images. Therefore, since a composite optical imaging device forms a total image by overlapping respective small images, each small optical imaging device must produce an erect equal-magnification image in the direction in which it is arranged. Usually these small optical imaging devices have small optical paths, and therefore, the optical path of the composite optical device from the object plane to the image plane is also short. The use of such an optical device enables a miniaturization of the above-mentioned machines, and furthermore, in general, such an optical device transmits a brighter image than those produced by conventional optical devices. The known types of those optical devices are; (a) an array of graded index lenses; (b) an array having a plurality of small optical imaging devices each comprising a plurality of convex lenses, as disclosed, for example, in United States Patent No. 3,584,952; (c) an array having a plurality of optical imaging devices each comprising convex lenses and a rectangular prims, as disclosed, for example, in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 56-117,201, and, (d) an array having a plurality of optical imaging devices, each comprising a right angled prism and a cylindrical lens used in conjunction with a positive lens, as disclosed, for example, in Research Disclosure No. 11212, "Lens-Prism Optical System". The optical imaging device of the above-mentioned (a) type comprises rod lenses having a cylindrical configuration. The refractive index distribution of each of these rod lenses changes sequentially in the radial direction from the center to the periphery thereof, and it is difficult to form such a refractive index distribution and to precisely control the distribution thereof. Further, it is particularly difficult to produce a wide diameter rod lens. Therefore, when it is necessary to widen the distance between the lens array surface and the object plane, the effective F number of this device is greatly reduced and accordingly, the brightness of the obtained image is lowered. Further, the refractive index of the medium of rod lens is changed according to the wavelength thereof, and therefore, an image produced by this optical imaging device has a large chromatic aberration. In the optical imaging device of above-mentioned (b) type, since one convex lens produces an inverted image, each small optical imaging device produces an inverted reduction image within itself for the first time, and then converts it to an erect equal-magnification image. The optical path in each small optical imaging device passes many times through the surfaces of the lenses, and therefore, the chromatic aberration of the obtained image becomes large due to the accumulation of refractive angles at those surfaces. Further, it is difficult to assemble this type optical imaging device because many lenses must be precisely arranged. Therefore, to reduce these production difficulties, the lenses of the respective small optical imaging devices are preferably produced as one lot for each lens layer. Nevertheless, when producing a long size array by this method, it is not easy to match each optical axis of respective layers, due to an accumulation of dimensional errors. The optical imaging device of above-mentioned (c) & (d) types have a small chromatic aberration because the accumulation of refractive angles is kept small by using a rectangular prism for inverting the image. Nevertheless, the center of the prism and the axis of the lens must be matched for each combination. If this matching is not precise, the irregularities of the light distribution are increased. Further, optical imaging devices of all of the above-mentioned types have disadvantages in that the obtained images are affected by periodical brightness irregularities due to the overlapping of images having light differentials between the optical axes and peripheries thereof. An object of the present invention is to provide an optical imaging device easily produced by a usual technique and projecting an image having little chromatic aberration and few brightness irregularities. According to the present invention, the optical imaging device comprises: reflecting means having a plurality of pairs of reflecting surfaces arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each pair of said reflecting surfaces being composed of two flat surfaces crossing at a π/2 radian, and each crossing line of two adjacent said reflecting surfaces being perpendicular to said first direction; a first cylindrical lens array having a plurality of same cylindrical lenses arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in said first direction, each of said cylindrical lens having a focusing power directed only to said first direction, said object plane and said image plane being on focal planes of said cylindrical lens, and second cylindrical focusing means having a focusing power directed only to a second direction perpendicular to said first direction, said cylindrical focusing means projecting said image component of said second direction from said object plane to said image plane; said optical path from said object plane to said image plane being reflected at said reflecting means and passing through said first cylindrical lens array before and after being reflected at said reflecting means and further passing through said second cylindrical focusing means, each combination of cylindrical lens of said first cylindrical lens array and said reflecting means projecting an erect equal-magnification image on said image plane, characterised in that a width W of each cylindrical lenses of said first cylindrical lens array is equal to a value given by the following formula (4), W = (N + 0.5)T where, T is a width of each pair of reflecting surfaces, N is an integer of more than 1. According to another aspect of the present invention, the optical imaging device comprises: reflecting means having a plurality of pairs of reflecting surfaces arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each pair of said reflecting surfaces being composed of two flat surfaces crossing at a π/2 radian, and each crossing line of two adjacent said reflecting surfaces being perpendicular to said first direction; a first cylindrical lens array having a plurality of same cylindrical lenses arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in said first direction, each of said cylindrical lens having a focusing power directed only to said first direction, said object plane and said image plane being on focal planes of said cylindrical lens, and second cylindrical focusing means having a focusing power directed only to a second direction perpendicular to said first direction, said cylindrical focusing means projecting said image component of said second direction from said object plane to said image plane; said optical path from said object plane to said image plane being reflected at said reflecting means and passing through said first cylindrical lens array before and after being reflected at said reflecting means and further passing through said second cylindrical focusing means, each combination of cylindrical lens of said first cylindrical lens array and said reflecting means projecting an erect equal-magnification image on said image plane, characterised in that the width of each cylindrical lens of said first cylindrical lens array is more than triple a pitch length of each pair of reflecting surfaces. According to another aspect of the present invention, the optical imaging device comprises: reflecting means having a plurality of pairs of reflecting surfaces arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each pair of said reflecting surfaces being composed of two flat surfaces crossing at a π/2 radian, and each crossing line of two adjacent said reflecting surfaces being perpendicular to said first direction; and focusing means having a plurality of convex lenses flatly arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each of said convex lenses having a same focal length; each combination of convex lens of said focusing means and said reflecting means projecting an erect equal-magnification image on said image plane having overlapping portions relative to other image patterns produced by other combinations of said convex lens and reflecting means; characterized in that a width W of each convex lens of said focusing means being equal to a value given by the following formula (4); W = (N + 0.5)T wherein, T is a pitch length of each pair of reflecting surfaces, N is an integer of more than 1. According to another aspect of the present invention, the optical imaging device comprises: reflecting means having a plurality of pairs of reflecting surfaces arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each pair of said reflecting surfaces being composed of two flat surfaces crossing at a π/2 radian, and each crossing line of two adjacent said reflecting surfaces being perpendicular to said first direction; and focusing means having a plurality of convex lenses flatly arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each of said convex lenses having a same focal length; each combination of such convex lenses of said focusing means and said reflecting means projecting an erect equal-magnification image on said image plane having overlapping portions relative to other image patterns produced by other combinations of said convex lenses and reflecting means; characterized in that the width of each convex lens of said focusing means being more than triple a pitch length of each pair of reflecting surfaces. The present invention will be more clearly understood from the description as set forth below with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein: Fig. 1 is a perspective view of the optical imaging device according to the present invention when applied to an image digitizing machine; Fig. 2 shows the fundamental construction of a comparative example, which includes cylindrical lenses and has a symmetrical construction opposite a reflecting surface; Fig. 3 shows a light ray trace which enters a pair of reflecting surfaces; Fig. 4 shows light ray traces which enter a reflecting plate; Fig. 5 shows light ray traces which are emitted from a point object and enter a pair of reflecting surfaces; Fig. 6 shows light ray traces in three dimensions, which are emitted from a point object and enter a reflecting plate; Fig. 7 shows another comparative example, having a construction which is not symmetrical opposite a reflecting surface; Fig. 8 shows a movement of the focusing point due to the presence of a different refractive medium; Fig. 9A shows a mechanism of an occurrence of stray light due to a reflecting at only one surface; Fig. 9B shows an example of light shield surfaces for reducing stray light; Fig. 10A shows a reflecting plate formed of prisms using a total reflection and light ray traces entering to this reflecting plate; Fig. 10B shows the incident angle range in which incident light rays can be returned from the reflecting plate having total reflection prisms; Fig. 10C shows an example of light shield surfaces provided within the same medium of the reflecting plate; Fig. 11 shows an example of light shield surfaces provided in the reflecting plate; Fig. 12 shows light ray traces which are emitted from a point object and enter a combination of a reflecting plate and a first cylindrical lens; Fig. 13 shows light ray traces, in three dimensions, which are emitted from a point object and enter a combination of a reflecting plate and a first cylindrical lens array; Fig. 14 shows a fundamental construction of the first embodiment, in which a cylindrical lenses is used as second cylindrical focusing means, and has a symmetrical construction opposite a reflecting surface; Fig. 15 shows an another fundamental construction of the first embodiment, having a construction which is not symmetrical opposite to a reflecting surface; Fig. 16 shows an overlapping appearance of respective image fields of first cylindrical lenses; Figs. 17A, 18A, 19A, 20A, 21A, 22A, 23A, 24A, 25A, 26A, 28A, 29A, 30A, 31A and 32A are perspective views of modifications of the first embodiment, and Figs. 17B, 18B, 19B, 20B, 21B, 22B, 23B, 24B, 25B, 26B, 28B, 29B, 30B, 31B and 32B are cross sectional views of these modifications; Fig. 27A is an example for comparing the optimum positions of the first cylindrical lens array, and Fig. 27B is a cross sectional view of this modification; Figs. 33A, 33B, 33C show the relative conditions of each first cylindrical lens and pairs of reflecting surfaces, in which one first cylindrical lens corresponds to n pairs of reflecting surfaces; Figs. 34A, 34B, 34C show light ray trances entering a combination of a first cylindrical lens and a reflecting plate in which the width of each first cylindrical lens corresponds to 1.5 pitch length of each pair of reflectinq surfaces; Fig. 35 shows a modification which has two mutually arranged arrays of first cylindrical lens; Fig. 36 shows a modification which has light shield surfaces both in the reflecting plate and on the first cylindrical lens array surface; Fig. 37 shows an example of a light shield means extended from the first cylindrical lens surface into the reflecting plate; Fig. 38 shows light ray traces in the plane perpendicular to a direction arrangement in which a reflection is obtained by a combination of a convex lens and a reflecting plate; Fig. 39 shows a fundamental construction of the second embodiment; Fig. 40 shows an example of a configuration of a convex lens array; and Figs. 41A, 42A, 43A, 44A, 45A, and 46A are perspective views of modifications of the second embodiment, and Figs. 41B, 42B, 43B, 44B, 45B and 46B are cross sectional views of these modifications. Figure 1 shows an example of an optical imaging device according to the present invention, when applied to an image digitizing apparatus. In the apparatus shown in Fig. 1, the optical imaging device 10 transmits a strip image of the original 11 onto an image sensor 12, and the image area corresponds to the area of detection of the image-sensor 12. The strip image is an equal-magnification image in the direction of the long axis of the strip area. In an electrophotographic copier, the image sensor is replaced by a photoconductor drum. In an LED printer, the original 11 and the image sensor 12 are respectively replaced by an array of LEDs and a photoconductor drum. Figure 2 shows a comparative example of an optical imaging device comprising a reflecting plate 1 that has a plurality of pairs of reflecting surfaces arranged on a flat surface and forming an array in the x direction, and a cylindrical lens 4 having a focusing power in only the direction perpendicular to the x direction. Each pair of reflecting surfaces of the reflecting plate 1 is composed of two flat surfaces crossing at the π/2 radian, and each crossing line of two adjacent reflecting surfaces is perpendicular to the x direction. As described later, the cylindrical lens 4 can be replaced by another cylindrical focusing means such as cylindrical mirrors. As shown in Fig. 2. the optical imaging device receives light rays from an object 2 and projects them onto an image 3. The image projecting area is a strip area which has a long axis in the x direction, and hereafter, the x direction is denoted as a first direction or an arrangement direction, and the y direction perpendicular to the x direction on the object plane or the image plane is denoted as a second direction. The focusing operation of the optical imaging device is now explained. Figure 3 is a cross sectional view of a pair of two reflecting surfaces crossing at a right angle (π/2 radian). As shown in Fig. 3, it is apparent that light rays incident on the pair of reflecting surfaces are returned in the opposite direction in the plane perpendicular to both reflecting surfaces. Figure 4 shows traces of the light rays emitted from a point object 2 and entering the reflecting plate 1. As shown in Fig. 3, light rays entering each pair of reflecting surfaces of the reflecting plate 1 are returned in opposite direction, and therefore, all light rays reflected at each pair of reflecting surfaces, respectively, are returned to the vicinity of the point object 2. If the pitch length of each pair of reflecting surfaces is sufficiently small, the point image of the point object 2 is produced at the same position as that of the point object in this plane. This is equivalent to the phenomenon that the reflecting plate 1 has an image focusing function in this plane. The resolving power of the reflecting plate 1 is determined by the pitch length of the pair of reflecting surfaces. Figure 5 shows traces of the light rays which are emitted from a point object 2 and reflected at a pair of reflecting surfaces. As shown in Fig. 5, the width of the image is a double width 2d of the pitch length d of the pair of reflecting surfaces. This holds true in a range where the angle of incidence angle on the reflecting plate 1 is not too large. The above description explains the focusing function in a plane perpendicular to both reflecting surfaces of the reflecting plate 1. The focusing function in three dimensions can be explained separately, in the respective planes. Figure 6 shows the focusing function of the reflecting plate in three dimensions. As shown in Fig. 6, the reflecting plate 1 produces an image 3 of a point object 2, and this image 3 is elongated in the direction perpendicular the arrangement direction of pairs of reflecting surfaces (first direction). In this arrangement, the optical imaging device further comprises a cylindrical lens 4 which has a focusing power in the plane perpendicular to the first direction, and focuses an image component in this plane as shown in Fig. 2. Therefore, the combination of the reflecting plate 1 and the cylindrical lens 4 receives light rays from a point object 2 and precisely focuses those rays onto the point image 3 in three dimensions. In Fig. 2, the optical path from the point object 2 to the image 3 passes through the cylindrical lens 4 before and after reflecting the reflecting plate 1. Therefore, the focusing condition of the optical imaging device according 'to this arrangement is such that the optical paths from the object 2 to the reflecting plate 1 and from the image 3 to the reflecting plate 1 are equal, and the object 2 and the image 3 are the conjugate points of the cylindrical lens 4. The optical imaging device shown in Fig. 2 is symmetrically opposite the reflecting plate 1, and satisfies the above condition. The image produced by the optical imaging device shown in Fig. 2 is an equal magnification image which is erect in the first direction and inverted in the second direction. Nevertheless, since the cylindrical lens is required only to focus the second direction component, other modifications can be made in which the cylindrical lens is only in the optical path either from the object to the reflecting plate or from the reflecting plate to the image. Figure 7 shows an example of these modifications. Figure 7 shows a cylindrical lens 4 in the optical path from the reflecting plate 1 to the image 3, and therefore, in this modification, the optical paths from the object 2 to the reflecting plate 1 and from the image 3 to the reflecting plate 1 are not symmetrical. A medium corresponding to the cylindrical lens exists only in the optical path from the image 3 to the reflecting plate 1, and therefore, the position of the image 3 moves. Figure 8 shows the movement of the focusing point due to the existence of a different medium 10 in the optical path. The value of the positional movement in Fig. 8 is easily obtained by the paraxial ray treatment. Namely, when a different refractive index medium 10 exists in the optical path from the object to the reflecting plate and from the image to the reflecting plate, both optical paths are required to satisfy the following conditions; Each parameter γ of both optical paths from the object to the reflecting plate and from the image to the reflecting plate must be almost equal. The parameter γ is given by the following formula (1); γ = Σ k l k / n k wherein, l k is a thickness of each respective medium in an optical path, n k is a refractive index of respective medium in an optical path. For example, as shown in Fig. 8, when a medium 10 exists in the air space between the image 3 and the reflecting plate 1, γ is a total addition of γ 1 , γ 2 and γ 3 , wherein γ 1 is the air thickness l 1 between the image and the surface of the medium 10 divided by the refractive index n of the air, γ 2 is the thickness l 2 of the medium 10 divided by the refractive index n 2 of the medium 10, and γ 3 is the air thickness l 3 between the surface of the medium 10 and the reflecting plate divided by the refractive index of the air. When the light rays diagonally enter the reflecting plate 1 as shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 7, it is impossible to fully satisfy the above-mentioned condition because parameters γ of the light rays are different according to the incident positions thereof on the reflecting plate 1. These differences are produced by light rays passing through cylindrical lens having different thickness, according to the incident positions thereon. This is why the expression " each parameter γ of both sides is substantially equal " is used in the claims. In practice, however, the optical imaging device has sufficiently focusing property if the differences of the parameters γ are small. The optical imaging device as shown in Fig. 7 must satisfy the above-mentioned condition. The cylindrical lens 4 projects the image 3 of the object 2 in the second direction, and the image obtained by the device shown in Fig. 7 is erect and equally-magnified in the first direction, and is inverted and reduced in the second direction. Conversely, when a cylindrical lens is positioned in the path between the object and the reflecting plate, the obtained image is inverted and magnified in the second direction. Namely, as described above, the optical imaging device according to this arrangement projects an erect equal-magnification image in the first direction, and projects an inverted image having a magnification which can be optionally determined in the second direction. The resolving power of the image obtained in the first direction is a double pitch width of the pairs of reflecting surfaces. The focusing condition of this device is such that the above parameters γ in both the object and image sides are substantially equal, and the cylindrical lens projects the image component in the second direction from the object plane to the image plane. The relative position between the reflecting plate and the cylindrical lens in parallel directions does not influence the focusing conditions, and therefore, only the distance between the reflecting plate and the cylindrical lens must be precisely set. When the pitch length of the pair of reflecting surfaces is sufficiently small, in comparison to the distance between the reflecting plate and image plane, the brightness distribution of the obtained image is very flat. Further, the obtained image has no chromatic aberration in the first (x) direction, and the chromatic aberration in the second (y) direction is as small as that obtained by the above-mentioned conventional type (c). In applications of the present device to machines such as an electrophotographic copier, optical imaging devices are generally required to transmit equal magnification images in both directions. Therefore, an optical imaging device as shown in Fig. 2 is suitable for use in such a machine, because this optical imaging device has a symmetrical construction. Other devices which have a non-symmetrical construction also produce equal-magnification image in both directions, and this symmetrical construction is easily assembled. In the above description, light rays entering a reflecting plate 1 are returned in the opposite direction as shown in Figs. 3 and 4. Strictly speaking, however, light rays which are reflected at only one surface of the pair of reflecting surfaces are not returned in the opposite direction as shown in Fig. 9A, and these light rays become to stray light rays which cause a lowering of the contrast of the image. Generally speaking, the light rays entering the reflecting plate at a large angle easily become stray lights, and therefore, preferably an optical imaging device according to the present embodiment comprises a plurality of light shield surfaces as shown in Fig. 9B; these light shield surfaces eliminate the stray light. The light shield surfaces 7 shown in Fig. 9B are thin black plates which absorb light, and are arranged parallel to the arrangement direction of the pairs of reflecting surfaces. Each of the light shield surfaces is perpendicular to the arrangement direction of the pairs of reflecting surfaces, and when the reflecting plate 1 and the light shield surfaces 7 are in the same medium as shown in Fig. 9B, the stray lights are eliminated if the length L of each light shield surface and the arrangement distance D between adjacent light shield surfaces satisfies the following condition; L ≧ D The light shield surfaces which satisfy the above condition can eliminate light entering the reflecting plate at more than a π/4 radian, and therefore, as shown in Fig. 9A, incident light having an angle of incidence of more than π/4 radian which becomes stray light, is eliminated before being reflected at the reflecting plate, and stray light which have an angle of more than π/4 radian after reflection is also eliminated. An example of the method needed for forming the reflecting plates of the reflecting array is a plastic molding method. The pitch length of the pairs of reflecting surfaces should be made as small as possible, to obtain a high resolution image, but when the pitch length is small, it is difficult to obtain the precise surface configurations, and thus the quality of the obtained image is lowered. The pitch length of the pairs of reflecting surfaces should be determined with reference to these factors. For example, there was practically produced an array of pairs of reflecting surfaces in the form of a prism array, by press molding onto an acrylic plate; the pitch length of a prism array is 0.5 mm. It was formed that, when the distance between the reflecting plate and the image surface is 10 to 40 mm, a good image having a low brightness irregularity can be obtained. Although, the resolution of this example as low as 1 mm, for use in, for example, electrophotographic copiers and facsimiles, but it is not difficult to make a prism array with a pitch length of less than 0.1 mm, to thus made one with a high resolution. The reflecting surfaces can be produced by metal deposition on the plastic surfaces, but another method of forming reflecting plates such that the total reflection of inner surfaces is used, as shown in Fig. 10A is known. As well known, when light rays enter a boundary surface, the propagation direction of the light rays is change according to the difference of the refractive indexes. When light rays enter a boundary surface from the medium of refractive index n to the air at the angle more than a critical angle  c , all light rays are fully reflected. This is called a total reflection. This critical angle  c is given by the following formula;  c = sin -1 (1/n). When the reflecting plate is formed by a plastic molding using the total reflection, light rays which enter from the air to the first surface 14 of the reflecting plate always have an incident angle that is less than the critical angle  c within the plate, as shown in Fig. 10B. Therefore, compared to the reflecting plate shown in Fig. 9A, the reflecting plate 1 shown in Fig. 10B receives less light rays having large angles opposite to the arrangement direction, which rays can easily become stray light rays. Further, light rays which enter the first surface 14 at a right angle enter the prism surface at the angle π/4, and light rays which have incident angles less than the critical angle  c to the prism surfaces also pass through the reflecting surfaces. Further, light rays which enter the first prism surface at incident angles more than π/2 -  c enter the second prism surface at the incident angle of less than  c after the first reflection, and pass through the second prism surface. Therefore, as shown in Fig. 10B, almost all of the light rays having an incident angle of more than κ passes through the reflecting plate. κ is given by the following formula; κ = n sin -1 (π/4 -  c ) wherein, n is a refractive index of the prism medium. Therefore, when the prism array is used as the reflecting surfaces, little stray light occurs. When the refractive index of the reflecting plate is a square root 2, the critical angle  c is π/4 radian. If the critical angle  c is π/4, the light ray entering the surface from the air to the reflecting plate at a right angle has a critical angle  c at the reflecting surfaces. Therefore, half of the incident light passes through the first reflecting surface of the pair of reflecting surfaces, and half of the incident light, reflected at the first surface passes through the second surface, because the incident angle to the second surface is within the critical angle  c . Consequently, the refractive index of the reflecting plate must be more than the square root 2. Nevertheless, it is apparent that the refractive index of the reflecting plate determines the ratio of returning light rays relative to incident light rays, and therefore, the refractive index of the reflecting plate must be as large as possible. The amount of stray light is less in the above reflecting plate having the total reflection prism than in the reflecting plate as shown in Fig. 9A, but the stray light cannot be completely eliminated. Therefore, the device using a total reflection prism also should comprise a plurality of light shield surfaces as shown in Fig. 10C. The light shield surfaces 7 as shown in Fig. 10C are arranged in a transparent plate having the same refractive index as the reflecting plate, and the transparent plate optically adhered to the reflecting plate. As described above, all incident lights have an angle less than the critical angle  c (< π/4) in the reflecting plate, and all stray lights reflected at the first surface have an incident angle more than the critical angle  c in the first incident surface and are fully reflected. Therefore, the stray lights are properly eliminated if the length L and the arrangement pitch distance D of the light shield surfaces satisfy the following condition; L ≧ D/2 It is apparent that the light shield shown in Fig. 10C can be thinner than the light shield shown in Fig. 9B. The above description shows the light shield directly arranged in front of the reflecting plate, but it can be arranged at another position. Nevertheless, the direct arrangement in front of the reflecting plate is preferable because the light shield should be arranged as far as possible from the object and the image, in order to reduce any brightness irregularities due to the light shield. Also, the light shields should be arranged in both optical paths, from the object to the reflecting plate and from the reflecting plate to the image, and thus the light shield can be commonly used if directly arranged in front of the reflecting plate. Figure 11 shows a perspective view of the modified reflecting plate 1 including the light shield surfaces. In the comparative examples the reflecting plate, having pairs of reflecting surfaces, projects the image component parallel to the arrangement direction of the pairs of reflecting surfaces. As described earlier, this acts to focus the image although the resolving power of the reflecting plate is determined by the pitch length of the pairs of reflecting surfaces. In the first embodiment of the present invention, the image component parallel to the arrangement direction is focused by the combination of the reflecting plate and cylindrical lenses. All these cylindrical lenses have the same focusing powers in the direction parallel to the arrangement direction, and are arranged directly in front of the reflecting plate. Although the resolving power is no longer influenced by the pitch length, since the image is formed by overlapping respective images, from the pairs of reflecting surfaces, the pitch length must be kept small in order to reduce irregularities of the brightness distribution. The reflecting plate according to the first embodiment is composed of pairs of flat reflecting surfaces which cross at the π/2 radian. As shown in Figs. 3 and 4, the light rays entering the reflecting plate are returned in the opposite direction, and therefore, when a cylindrical lens is arranged directly in front of the reflecting plate 1 as shown in Fig. 12, and the point object 2 is on the focal plane of the cylindrical lens, light rays from the object 2 are changed to parallel light rays after passing through the cylindrical lens, and these parallel light rays then enter the reflecting plate and are returned in the opposite direction. These reflecting light rays are again focused at the position 2, and consequently, a combination of the cylindrical lens and the reflecting plate projects and erect equal-magnification image in the arrangement direction. Fig. 13 shows an arrangement that comprises a plurality of cylindrical lenses 16 arranged parallel to the reflecting surfaces 1, and each image projected by the combinations of cylindrical lenses and the reflecting plate partially overlaps an adjacent image. Consequently, the reflecting plate 1 and the cylindrical lenses 16 receive light rays from the object 2 and focus them at the line image 3. In the following, these arranged cylindrical lenses are designated as a first cvlindrical lens array. Similar to the comparative examples, a cylindrical focusing means is used to project the image component perpendicular to the arrangement direction, and is designated as the second cylindrical focusing means in the following. Namely, the optical imaging device of the first embodiment, the combinations of the reflecting plate and the first cylindrical lens array project the image component parallel to the arrangement direction, and the second cylindrical focusing means projects the image component perpendicular to the arrangement direction. Fig. 14 shows a fundamental construction of the optical imaging device according to the first embodiment, wherein a point object 2 and an image 3 are on both focal planes of a cylindrical lens 4 and respective cylindrical lenses of a cylindrical lens array 16. In Fig. 14, the point object 2 and the image 3 are at symmetrical positions relative to the focusing means such as the cylindrical lens 4, the cylindrical lens array 6 and the reflecting plate, and therefore, the projected image 3 is an equal-magnification image in both directions and is erect in the arrangement direction (x direction) and inverted in the other direction (y direction). In the device shown in Fig. 14, the combination of the reflecting plate 1 and the first cylindrical lens array must project the erect equal-magnification image for an image overlapping, but in the y direction, the projected image can be at other magnifications. Fig. 15 shows an above example of a reduced image in the y direction. In the construction shown in Fig. 15 the cylindrical lens 4 is arranged in the optical path from the combination of the reflecting plate 1 and the cylindrical lens array 6 to the image 3. The above-mentioned γs of both optical paths in the object side and the image side must be equal, and if the cylindrical lens 4 is arranged in the optical path in the image side in Fig. 15, a magnified image is obtained. As described above, in the applications to machines, an erect equal-magnification image is required in many cases, and therefore, the symmetrical construction as shown in Fig. 44 is useful because it is easy to design and produce. As shown in Fig. 9A, light rays reflected at only one surface of each pair of reflecting plates become stray light and lowers the image contrast. The construction having the light shield surfaces for reducing the stray light, as shown in Figs. 9B, 10C, and 11, is also effective in this embodiment. As described above, when a reflecting plate is formed of prisms using the total reflection, light rays enter a reflecting plate only at angles less than κ given by the formula (6). Therefore, when the first cylindrical lens array is combined with the reflecting plate, the projectable field area of each first cylindrical lens is limited. Fig. 16 shows the range projected by the first cylindrical lens array and the reflecting plate. In Fig. 16, the first cylindrical lens array and the reflecting plate are incorporated, and the pitch length of the arranged first cylindrical lenses is T. Cylindrical lenses respectively cover the image areas within the angle κ, and each area overlaps the adjacent areas in a range farther than a line 14. Therefore, when the image plane (object plane) is within the line 14 from the cylindrical lens surface, there are areas in which no image areas overlap. Those areas receive no light rays and very dark, and consequently, the light distribution on the image plane varies with the period T. The image plane must be farther from the surface of the cylindrical lens array than the line 14. Namely, the distance ℓ between the surface of the cylindrical lens array and the image plane must satisfy the following formula; 2ℓ tan κ ≧ T When the inner total reflection of a mold prism array is used, the above-mentioned light variation having the period T is easily produced, even though the image plane is farther than the line 14, and therefore, the pitch length T of the first cylindrical lens arrangement must be carefully determined according to the distance between the image and the first cylindrical lens array ℓ. If the reflecting surfaces of the reflecting plate are changed from the total reflection prisms to the metal deposited mirrors, the above-mentioned light variation can be reduced, but the image aberrations are increased by an increase in the field angle. Therefore, preferably the light variation is reduced by shortening the pitch length of the first cylindrical lenses. When an optical imaging device according to the first embodiment is applied to practical machines, many modifications can be made thereto, and these modifications are explained in the following. In the modification shown in Figs. 17A and 17B, an array of a first cylindrical lens 16 and a reflecting plate 1 are incorporated. Further, this modification comprises a second cylindrical lens 4 and two folding mirrors 5 for parallelizing an object plane and an image plane. The image area is a strip having a long axis in the x direction, and the image 3 of the point object 2 is obtained at the position shown in Fig. 17A. The obtained image is an equal-magnification image in the x and y directions. In the modification shown in Figs. 18A and 18B, a second cylindrical lens 4 and two folding mirrors 5 are further incorporated. In the modification shown in Figs. 19A and 19B, two cylindrical lenses 4 and two folding mirrors 5 are incorporated. The object surface and the image surface are also parallel. When both cylindrical surfaces which respectively perform the functions of the cylindrical lens 4, are the same, an equal-magnification image is obtained in both directions. If the cylindrical surfaces 4 are different, an obtained image can be magnified or reduced in the y direction. This is commonly possible in the following examples. In the modification shown in Figs. 20A and 20B, three second cylindrical lenses 4a, 4b and two folding mirrors 5 are incorporated, and a reflecting plate 1 and a first cylindrical lens array 16 are also incorporated. The functions of cylindrical lenses 4 shown in Figs. 19A and 19B are divided into the cylindrical lenses 4a and cylindrical lens 4b, and by dividing the function of the cylindrical lens, the curvature of each of the cylindrical lenses can be made smaller, to thereby make the total aberrations of the device smaller. As shown in Figs. 21A and 21B, the number of cylindrical lenses can be increased. In the modification shown in Figs. 22A and 22B a reflecting plate 1 and a first cylindrical lens array 16 are incorporated in the same way as shown in Figs. 17A and 17B. A beam splitter having a semitransparent mirror 7 is included for dividing optical paths to an object side and an image side. This beam splitter is incorporated with a second cylindrical lens 4. The object surface is perpendicular to the image surface. In the modification shown in Figs. 23A and 23B, two second cylindrical lenses 4 are incorporated with a beam splitter. The function of the second cylindrical lens 4 shown in Figs. 22A and 22B is divided into two cylindrical lenses in this modifications. When different cylindrical lenses exist in either of the optical paths from the object to the reflecting plate or from the image to the reflecting plate shown in Figs. 20A and 23A the optical imaging device can transmit a magnified or reduced image in the y direction similar to Fig. 19A The modifications shown in Figs. 24A, 24B and 25A, 25B realized the above-mentioned function. When an optical imaging device comprises a beam splitter as shown in Figs. 22A, 22B, 23A and 23B, the obtained image is dark, and therefore, a modification which projects a bright image is required. An example of this modification is illustrated in Figs. 26A and 26B. In this modification, a reflecting plate 1 is further added to the optical imaging device shown in Figs. 23A and 23B, and the image having a double brightness can be obtained, compared to that of the device shown in Fiqs. 23A and 23B. In the modifications shown in Figs. 19A, 23A and 26A, optical elements such as a beam splitter and folding mirrors are placed neither between the object plane and the cylindrical lens of object side nor between the cylindrical lens of the image side and the image plane, and therefore, short focal length cylindrical lenses can be used and thus a bright image can be obtained. When the effective focal length of the cylindrical lenses is short, although a bright image can be obtained, the focal depth becomes short. Conversely, when the effective focal length of the cylindrical lenses is long, although an obtained image becomes dark, the focal depth becomes long. When a long focal length cylindrical lens is used, the modifications as shown in Figs. 17A, 18A and 22A can make the total device more compact. Next, the optimum position of an array of first cylindrical lenses is explained. Figures 27A and 27B show an example of positions of an array of a first cylindrical lenses, as a comparison of the optimum position. In the construction as shown in Figs. 27A and 27B, two arrays of first cylindrical lenses are respectively arranged in both optical paths. Of course, the device shown in Figs. 27A and 27B can fundamentally project the image, but in practice, it is difficult to adjust each optical axis of the respective cylindrical lenses with the corresponding axis in the other side. Also, since the distances between the arrays of first cylindrical lenses and the reflecting plate are long, the variations of the light distribution on the image plane become large when the optical path length are the same. Therefore, a first cylindrical lens array must be commonly arranged in both optical paths at the object side and image side, and arranged directly in front of the reflecting plate. Nevertheless, the arrangement as shown in Figs. 28A and 28B, in which a second cylindrical lens 4 is arranged between a first cylindrical lens array 16 and a reflecting plate 1, can be used without problems. In the optical imaging device of the first embodiment, cylindrical mirrors can be used instead of the second cylindrical lenses. Examples thereof are illustrated in the following. In the modification shown in Figs. 29A and 29B, second cylindrical mirrors 41 perform the functions of the second cylindrical lens 4 and the folding mirrors 5. When the curvatures of the second cylindrical mirrors 41 are different and the positions are changed according to those curvatures, the obtained image can be magnified or reduced in the y direction. Figures 30A and 30B show a particular example in which one of the second cylindrical mirrors is flat. The image obtained in Figs. 30A and 30B is reduced in the y direction. In the modification shown in Figs. 31A and 31B, a second cylindrical mirror 41 is included. This second cylindrical mirror corresponds to the second cylindrical lens in Figs. 22A and 22B. The optical imaging device which comprises second cylindrical mirrors instead of second cylindrical lenses has an advantage in that an obtained image has less chromatic aberrations, but the manufacturing of cylindrical mirrors requires a higher molding precision. The modification shown in Figs. 32A and 32B comprises two sets of a second cylindrical lens and second cylindrical mirror, and this joint use of cylindrical lenses and cylindrical mirrors enables many variations of the device modifications to be designed. Now, the correlation between the first cylindrical lens and the pairs of reflecting surfaces of the reflecting plate is explained. The above correlation has two factors; the difference between the pitch lengths of pairs of reflecting surfaces of the reflecting plate and the pitch length of the first cylindrical lens arrays, and the relative position of the pair of reflecting surfaces and the first cylindrical lens. In Fig. 33A, both pitch lengths are the same, and each pair of the reflecting surfaces corresponds to respective cylindrical lens, and the correlation shown in Fig. 33A produces an normal image. Nevertheless, if each axis of the first cylindrical lenses is moved from the respective centers of the pairs of reflecting surfaces, the brightness on the image plane changes very quickly, and no image can be obtained at all when the movement becomes a half pitch. Namely, the brightness variation occurs due to the difference in the axes of the first cylindrical lenses and pairs of reflecting surfaces. In Fig. 33B, the pitch length of the first cylindrical lens arrangement is double the pitch length of the pairs of reflecting surfaces. A brightest image can be obtained when the relative position is as shown in Fig. 33B; this brightness is almost the same as the maximum brightness obtained in Fig. 33A. When each axis of first cylindrical lenses is moved a half pitch of the pair of reflecting surfaces, the obtained image becomes very dark, but the difference between the brightest and the darkest conditions is a half of that shown in Fig. 33A. In Fig. 33C, one first cylindrical lens corresponds to many pairs of reflecting surfaces. When one first cylindrical lens corresponds to N pairs of reflecting surfaces, the image brightness variation due to the difference in the axes is 1/N of the maximum brightness. Therefore, when N is large, the image brightness variation due to the difference in the axes can be practically neglected, and the operation for adjusting the axes of the first cylindrical lenses to the centers of respective pairs of reflecting surfaces becomes unnecessary. When an optical imaging device according to the present invention is applied to machines, the brightness variation on the imaging surface is practically required to be less than about 30%. As described above, the brightness variation can be less than about 30% without adjusting the axes when the pitch length of the first cylindrical lenses is more than triple that of the pitch length of pairs of reflecting surfaces. In practice, this ratio is preferably more than 5 and more preferably more than 10. In the above, the correlations obtained when the ratio of pitch length of the first cylindrical lens array and the reflecting surface pair array is an integer are explained. Other conditions exist in which even brightness contributions are always produced,'and in these conditions, the width W of the first cylindrical lens and the pitch length T satisfy the following formula; W = (N + 0.5)T wherein, N is an integer more than 1. The principle of these conditions is explained with reference to Figs. 34A, 34B and 34C, which show three kinds of relative positions of the first cylindrical lens 16 and the pairs of reflecting surfaces. In the figures, the pitch length of the pair of reflecting surfaces is 1. As shown in Fig. 34A, light rays entering the ranges having widths 2P and 2Q in respective pairs of reflecting surfaces can be returned in the opposite directions and become image light rays. The widths P and Q are given in the following formula; P + Q = 0.5 Therefore, 2P + 2Q = 1 Namely the width of the effective aperture of the first cylindrical lens 16 is 1. In the states as shown in Figs. 34B and 34C, all light rays entering one pair of reflecting surfaces can be returned in the opposite directions, and other light rays are not returned. Therefore, the effective apertures shown in Figs 34B and 34C are also 1. Consequently, when the correlation of the first cylindrical lens array and the pairs of reflecting surfaces satisfies the above conditions, the effective aperture is always 1 regardless the relative positions, and an adjustment of the relative positions is not required. The above condition can be also satisfied when the integers are other than 1. Nevertheless, the maximum values of the image brightness obtained in the above conditions are less than obtained in Fig. 33A. In particular, when W is 1.5T, the obtained brightness is about 30% different to that obtained in Fig. 33A. Further, as shown in Figs. 34A, 34B and 34C, a light shield means 13 is required on the surface of the first cylindrical lens array, in order to reduce the stray light, and therefore, the effective aperture is smaller. The light shield means can be formed by black paint. The above-mentioned brightness variation on the image surface is due to the positional differences between the first cylindrical lens array and the reflecting plate, but another factors producing the brightness variation on the image plane exist, such as the brightness variations in the fields projected by respective first cylindrical lenses, and the overlapping states of those fields. To reduce these variations, the pitch length of the first cylindrical lens array must be much smaller than the distance between the image plane and the first cylindrical lens array, as this makes the overlapping ratio of the respective fields large. The overlapping ratio can be increased by mutually arranging two first cylindrical lens arrays as shown in Fig. 35. The row number of first cylindrical lens arrays can be more than 3, but the number is preferably even for obtaining the lowest variation. As described above, the light shield surfaces can be used for reducing the stray light, and in the present embodiment, a reflecting plate having the light shield surfaces shown in Fig. 11 also can be used. Figure 36 shows a modification in which light shield surfaces are provided at both the reflecting plate and at the surface of first cylindrical lens array. When the light shield means 13 extends into the first cylindrical lens array as shown in Fig. 37, the light shield means can also perform the function of the light shield surfaces 7. In an optical imaging device according to the second embodiment, a reflecting plate and an array of convex lenses are combined. When a convex lens is arranged directly in front of the reflecting plate, an image component of the direction parallel to the arrangement direction is projected as shown in Figs. 12 and 13, and an image component perpendicular to the arrangement direction is also projected at the same position as shown in Fig. 38. Therefore, the obtained image is an equal-magnification image in both direction, and an erect image is obtained in the arrangement direction and an inverted image is obtained in the other direction. When these convex lenses are arranged in front of the reflecting plate 1, as shown in Fig. 39, each convex lens projects an erect equal-magnification image in the arrangement direction, and therefore, each image overlaps images projected by adjacent convex lenses. Namely, an optical imaging device according to the second embodiment projects an image of a strip area. An optical imaging device disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication 56-117,201 also comprises an array of convex lenses and an array of pairs of reflecting surfaces, but since each convex lens corresponds to a pair of reflecting surfaces, each axis of the convex lenses is strictly required to match the center of pairs of reflecting surfaces, to obtain an even brightness distribution on an image plane. Particularly, when the positional difference between the convex lens and the pair of reflecting surfaces is a half of the pitch length of the pairs of reflecting surfaces, no image is projected at all. Therefore, the field area of such a combination of a convex lens and a pair of reflecting surfaces becomes dark and causes brightness variations. The principle of these phenomena is explained in the description of the first embodiment. As described above, an even brightness distribution on the image plane can be obtained regardless of the relative positional difference when the correlations between the width W of the convex lens and the pitch length T of the pair of reflecting surfaces satisfy the above-mentioned formula (7), or the width W is sufficiently large compared to the pitch length T. The form of each convex lens may be circular as shown in Fig. 39, but if desired, can be square as shown in Fig. 40, to obtain an even brightness distribution on the image plane. Note, when the width W is sufficiently large compared with the pitch length T, the optical imaging device having square from convex lenses also can project an even image. Light shield means and light shield surfaces are also effective in the second embodiment, and areas 13 are examples of the light shield means, which can be formed by paint. Many modifications for applying an optical imaging device according to the second embodiment to machines can be made, and these modifications are illustrated in the following. In the Figures, the pairs of reflecting surfaces are shown to be small compared to the convex lenses, but the modifications are substantially the same as in all other cases. The pairs of reflecting surfaces of the reflecting plate 1 are formed of an array of prisms, and the surfaces of the prisms are treated by the metal deposition treatment, for an enhanced reflection. In the modification shown in Figs. 41A and 41B, an array of convex lenses and an array of pairs of reflecting surfaces are incorporated. Further, this modification comprises two folding mirrors 5 for parallelizing a object surface and an image plane. The image area is a strip having a long axis in the x direction, and the image 3 of the point object 2 is obtained at the same position as shown in Figs. 17A and 17B. The obtained image is an equal-magnification image in the x and y directions. A modification shown in Figs. 42A and 42B comprises a beam splitter having a semitransparent mirror 6 for diving optical paths to an object side and an image side. The object surface is perpendicular to the image plane. In the modification shown in Figs. 43A and 43B of convex lenses 17, a beam splitter, is incorporated and the object plane and the image plane are perpendicular. Figures 44A and 44B show an example as a comparison of the positions of the arrays of convex lenses. The modification as shown in Figs. 44A and 44B can fundamentally project an image, but the agreement of the corresponding axes of both convex lens arrays is difficult. Further, since the distance between the image plane and the convex lens surface is short, the brightness variation on the image plane is easily made large, and therefore, this modification is not preferable. In the modification shown in Figs. 45A and 45B, an array of convex lenses 17 and two folding mirror 5 are incorporated. As described above, when a beam splitter is used, the obtained image become dark. In a modification shown in Figs. 46A and 46B, two blocks having an array of convex lenses and a reflecting plate are included, and the brightness of obtained image is double that obtained in Figs. 42A and 42B. When the relative position of one array of convex lenses to the other changes in the x direction, a position exists at which a brightness variation on the image plane becomes a minimum value due to a mutual interference there between. Therefore, the brightness variation on the image plane can be made smaller, compared to Figs. 42A and 42B, by adjusting the relative positions of the two blocks. Many widely different embodiments of the present invention may be constructed without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, and it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described in this specification, except as defined in the appended claims.

Claims: An optical imaging device for projecting an image of a strip area from an object plane via an optical path to an image plane comprising: reflecting means (1) having a plurality of pairs of reflecting surfaces arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each pair of said reflecting surfaces being composed of two flat surfaces crossing at a π/2 radian, and each crossing line of two adjacent said reflecting surfaces being perpendicular to said first direction; a first cylindrical lens array (16) having a plurality of same cylindrical lenses arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in said first direction, each of said cylindrical lens having a focusing power directed only to said first direction, said object plane and said image plane being on focal planes of said cylindrical lens, and second cylindrical focusing means (4, 41) having a focusing power directed only to a second direction perpendicular to said first direction, said cylindrical focusing means projecting said image component of said second direction from said object plane to said image plane; said optical path from said object plane to said image plane being reflected at said reflecting means (1) and passing through said first cylindrical lens array (16) before and after being reflected at said reflecting means (1) and further passing through said second cylindrical focusing means (4, 14), each combination of cylindrical lens of said first cylindrical lens array (16) and said reflecting means (1) projecting an erect equal-magnification image on said image plane, characterised in that a width W of each cylindrical lenses of said first cylindrical lens array (16) is equal to a value given by the following formula (4), W = (N + 0.5)T where, T is a width of each pair of reflecting surfaces, N is an integer of more than 1. An optical imaging device for projecting an image of a strip area from an object plane via an optical path to an image plane comprising: reflecting means (1) having a plurality of pairs of reflecting surfaces arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each pair of said reflecting surfaces being composed of two flat surfaces crossing at a π/2 radian, and each crossing line of two adjacent said reflecting surfaces being perpendicular to said first direction; a first cylindrical lens array (16) having a plurality of same cylindrical lenses arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in said first direction, each of said cylindrical lens having a focusing power directed only to said first direction, said object plane and said image plane being on focal planes of said cylindrical lens, and second cylindrical focusing means (4, 41) having a focusing power directed only to a second direction perpendicular to said first direction, said cylindrical focusing means projecting said image component of said second direction from said object plane to said image plane; said optical path from said object plane to said image plane being reflected at said reflecting means (1) and passing through said first cylindrical lens array (16) before and after being reflected at said reflecting means (1) and further passing through said second cylindrical focusing means (4, 14), each combination of cylindrical lens of said first cylindrical lens array (16) and said reflecting means (1) projecting an erect equal-magnification image on said image plane, characterised in that the width of each cylindrical lens of said first cylindrical lens array (16) is more than triple a pitch length of each pair of reflecting surfaces. An optical imaging device as set forth in claims 1 or 2, wherein said second cylindrical focusing means comprises at least one cylindrical lens (4). An optical imaging device as set forth in claims 1 or 2, wherein said second cylindrical focusing means comprises at least one cylindrical mirror (41). An optical imaging device as set forth in claims 1 or 2, wherein said second cylindrical focusing means comprises at least one cylindrical lens (4) and one cylindrical mirror (41). An optical imaging device as set forth in any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein constructions and positions of said second cylindrical focusing means (4, 41) are equal and symmetrically opposite to said reflecting means (1). An optical imaging device for projecting an image of a strip area from an object plane via an optical path to an image plane, comprising: reflecting means (1) having a plurality of pairs of reflecting surfaces arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each pair of said reflecting surfaces being composed of two flat surfaces crossing at a π/2 radian, and each crossing line of two adjacent said reflecting surfaces being perpendicular to said first direction; and focusing means (17) having a plurality of convex lenses flatly arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each of said convex lenses having a same focal length; each combination of convex lens of said focusing means (17) and said reflecting means (1) projecting an erect equal-magnification image on said image plane having overlapping portions relative to other image patterns produced by other combinations of said convex lens and reflecting means (1); characterized in that a width W of each convex lens of said focusing means (17) being equal to a value given by the following formula (4); W = (N + 0.5)T wherein, T is a pitch length of each pair of reflecting surfaces, N is an integer of more than 1. An optical imaging device for projecting an image of a strip area from an object plane via an optical path to an image plane, comprising: reflecting means (1) having a plurality of pairs of reflecting surfaces arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each pair of said reflecting surfaces being composed of two flat surfaces crossing at a π/2 radian, and each crossing line of two adjacent said reflecting surfaces being perpendicular to said first direction; and focusing means (17) having a plurality of convex lenses flatly arranged on a flat surface and forming an array extending in a first direction parallel to a long axis of said strip area, each of said convex lenses having a same focal length; each combination of such convex lenses of said focusing means (17) and said reflecting means (1) projecting an erect equal-magnification image on said image plane having overlapping portions relative to other image patterns produced by other combinations of said convex lenses and reflecting means; characterized in that the width of each convex lens of said focusing means (17) being more than triple a pitch length of each pair of reflecting surfaces (1). An optical imaging device as set forth in claim 7 or claim 8, wherein said optical imaging device further comprises reflecting means (5) for folding optical paths. An optical imaging device as set forth in any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein said pair of reflecting surfaces of said reflecting means (1) is a total reflection prism made of a material having a refraction index which is more than a square root 2. An optical imaging device as set forth in any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein said optical imaging device further comprises a plurality of light shield surfaces (7) arranged respectively in front of said pairs of reflecting surfaces, each of said light shield surfaces is perpendicular to said first direction.

Inventors: OISHI NORIJI, OISHI, NORIJI, Oishi, Noriji, c/o Products Development Lab
Applicants: MITSUBISHI RAYON CO, MITSUBISHI RAYON CO., LTD
Application year: 1991
Main classification: G02B5
IPC codes: G02B5