MULTICHANNEL BACKPLANE BUS SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

Abstract: A local area network, or LAN, configuration is provided with a multiple generic LAN channel architecture which can be logically and dynamically changed. The configuraton control can be applied to each module (120) of the network and to each port of a module of a LAN hub. Multiple LAN protocols can be used simultaneously through protocol specific functions. Protocols such as token bus, token ring, and fiber distributed data interface (FDDI) can be implemented using the generic channel architecture. Digital collision detection and information necessary for precise network statistics monitoring are provided. The token passing ring architecture provides a logical ring formation within the generic channel. A token passing bus architecture uses modified Ethernet architecture, and a hub management provides control for the generic multichannel. Multiple hub management entities are provided via hub mastership arbitration to provide a unique master for the hub management function.

Description: MULTICHANNEL BACKPLANE BUS SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates generally to a generic multichannel backplane bus architecture and its application thereof and more specifically to Local Area Network (LAN) and Wide Area Network (WAN) systems, and more particularly to a system for providing multiple LAN protocols, simultaneous multiple protocol-independent generic channels of communication on a backplane, as well as a unique means of LAN media connections to the backplane, and unique and useful systems of monitoring and controlling a LAN environment. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION . Various systems for Local Area Networks are known from the prior art. These systems are all based on a particular medium and other particular standards which pose significant problems in the field with regard to compatability and various standards. The LAN standards in existence that pertain to this disclosure include: Digital Equipment Corporation/Intel/Xerox Ethernet™ Version 2.0; ISO/ANSI/IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD; ISO/ANSI/IEEE 802.4 Token Bus; ISO/ANSI/IEEE 802.5 Token Ring; ISO/ANSI X3T9.5 FDDI (Fiber optic Distributed Data Interface) — a Token Passing Ring. All of the above are networking protocols, and each standard specifies the Media Access methods (MAC) , and Logical communication Link Control methods (LLC) . The concept of the "backplane bus" is well established in the computer and communications field; examples of standardized and proprietary backplane buses abound. In the most general terms, a backplane bus is a wiring center common to a single platform and shared by a number of users (generally implemented as printed circuit boards plugged into the bus via a single connector) . The backplane bus is generally used for communications between the users according to some common protocol. Prior art arrangements in this field require that the bus be dedicated to a single bus access protocol, and that all users of the bus communicate across the bus using only this protocol. The protocol consists of an access method, data format and data rate, all of which must be common to all users of the bus. Only one user of the bus may generate data "packets" onto the bus at any instant; access to the bus is governed by a distributed mechanism common to all users of the bus, termed the access method. Specifically in LAN applications of backplane buses, there are two well established access methods: Carrier Sense, Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) and Token Passing. Token passing further distinguishes to a physical ring and physical bus manifestation. All of these access methods are used with multiple data rates and data formats, generating numerous protocols; in addition, there are other protocols which combine elements of both CSMA/CD and Token Passing, as well as protocols which use only some elements of the access methods (e.g. Carrier Sense, Multiple Access without Collision Detection) . Prior art in this field provides a single, unique backplane bus designed specifically for a single protocol. An example of an implementation of a single protocol backplane bus is found in the Multiconnect™ Repeater from 3Com Corporation. This product offers a backplane bus dedicated to the IEEE 802.3 10 MegaBit/Second CSMA/CD protocol (commonly known as Ethernet TM) . Additional prior art in this field provides multiple unique, separate backplane buses, each of which is specifically designed to support a single protocol. An example of this implementation is found in the System 3000™ Wiring Concentrator from Synoptics Corporation. This product offers four independent backplane bus protocols, each dedicated uniquely to one of the following protocols: 1. IEEE 802.3 10 Megabit/Second CSMA/CD (Ethernet™); 2. IEEE 802.5 4 Megabit/Second Token Passing Ring; 3. IEEE 802.5 16 Megabit/Second Token Passing Ring; and 4.ANSI X3T9.5 100 Megabit/Second Token Passing Ring (FDDI) Additional prior art arrangements in this field provide a single backplane bus implementing a single protocol, and require the users of the bus to support protocol conversion between external multiple protocol interfaces and the internal protocol. All of these prior art arrangements suffer from the following limitations: 1. The backplane bus is dedicated to a single protocol, allowing no flexibility for growth or change; 2. The backplane bus supports only a single data path, allowing only one data packet to be generated onto the bus at any time; 3. Removing these limitations in the prior art lead to higher costs: additional backplane buses or complex protocol converters (e.g. network bridges) ; 4. Each module within a system cannot be operating independently from the backplane network. Arrangements providing similar functions are known. The Access One™ from Ungermann-Bass, System 3000™ from Synoptics, MMNC™ from Cabletron, Multiconnect™ from 3Com corporations are examples of prior art arrangements. Access One™ from Ungermann-Bass, System 3000™ from Synoptics, MMAC™ from Cabletron, Multiconnect™ from 3Com all employ dedicated protocol channels, and most offer one protocol and one channel only. SUMMARY AND OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the invention to provide a system and an arrangement for networks of all media types, including twisted pair, fiber optic, thin and thick coaxial cable and others by employing a concentrator which is modular and which provides a fault tolerant platform for one or more networks. It is a further object of the invention to provide a system with communication channels which can be reconfigured at any time to a new protocol and support communication using the new protocol without providing a new management means. According to the invention, a plurality of identical communication channels are provided in the form of a multiple channel concentrator with a plurality of slots. Each slot connects to the generic channels such that modules connected into the slot connect with the channels. Media channels and management channels are connected to' the concentrator and provide the ability to operate several networks using different protocols concurrently with a single system concentrator. According to the invention a unique means of connecting media to the backplane is provided by module switching to any channel. This uses the concept of a generic channel architecture. This module switching section provides means for switching each module, of any protocol or any media interface type, to any available channel thereby assigning the channel to a specific protocol dynamically. This invention is further improved by each port associated with a particular module switching to any channel. This allows building of a logical network configuration with a physical network connections. Several different types of modules exist in a LAN system hub according to the invention. The following describes and defines each type. Control Module: A central module that performs functions uniquely related to a hub. The functions associated with this module is often integrated with other type of modules to lower the cost of a system. Media Module: A module that interfaces to a LAN media specified in any of the aforementioned Standards. Each standard defines electrical, mechanical, functional, and optical, if applicable, interfaces for a particular media. A media module often has multiple ports. Network Management Module: A module that interfaces the backplane that monitors LAN system status, controls system and module parameters, configures system and module parameters, and reports a LAN system status and network statistics. Bridge Module: A module that implements any type of store- and-forward-function for any purpose. It either converts one protocol to another, or filters (receive all transmissions from one port, and selectively transmits to another port, or both) . According to the invention the connection of a given medium to the backplane is provided by a module switching element which has the ability to physically switch each module to any channel. This module switching provides modules, of any type listed above, with the capability to establish a LAN connection to the backplane, and to be connected or to any channel or to be isolated from the backplane allowing each module to continue to operate without any LAN connection to other modules. This module switching element again uses the concept of the generic channel architecture. This allows for the switching of each port of a module of any protocol or any media interface card to any channel and allowing for the building of a logical network configuration with physical network connections. The concept of logical network and the physical network configuration has been only attainable through a physical embodiment of physical network connections. Thus this invention provides dynamic control over physical network connections. The module switching to any channel, allows a logical network by allowing any module to switch from one channel to another. This switching is restricted in that the switched module, switches all the parts connected to that module to another channel. This restriction forces users to pre-sort connections. Physical port switching does not have this restriction. Thus, module switching is further improved by allowing each port of a module to switch to any channel. For the purpose of economics, both module and port switching inventions are deemed uniquely and proportionally useful in applications needing network topological flexibility. According to a further aspect of the invention, in order to organize the LAN/WAN, a management channel is provided. This management channel may be used for multi-management module arbitration with allowance to multiple agents. Remote management of a LAN system is a well known function that most LAN systems offer. The intelligent entity within a LAN system that communicates to a host is called a Network Management Agent (NMA) . All known implementations of the NMA integrate LAN management as well as vendor-specific hub system management. System 3000 from Synoptics, and MMAC™ from Cabletron, employ a dedicated management master for the purpose of network management functions in a Hub. All of the known multiplicity of management functions in these systems are, at most, provided for redundancy to the primary function. This invention conceptually separates hub management functions from the network management functions. The architecture that separates the two functions which traditionally have been implemented as an integrated set of functions, provides the following useful features: 1. It allows multiple LAN Management Modules in one hub. This also allows redundant Management Modules. 2. It allows two multiple Network Management Agents pertaining to the operation with the Hub Management functions and its election. This architecture of the present invention allows new and useful features to be incorporated in existing LAN/WAN protocols. These features are included in the protocols used according to the present invention. According to the invention the Ethernet™ system has been improved. The invention provides a deterministic and precise method for collision detection on the backplane using slot-ID. Further precise collision counting is provided per-port. Still further, the invention allows a synchronous Ethernet™ channel, and half the repeater implementations of Ethernet™ modules. According to the invention, collision-detection on the backplane using slot-IDs is provided allowing purely digital (binary) electronic circuits to detect contention of two or more * TM * • simultaneous Ethernet transmissions on a backplane. The occurrence of this contention is called Collision. Ethernet™ is also called CSMA/CD, Carrier-Sense, Multiple Access/Collision Detection. The prior art is the Ethernet™ implementations by many companies such as Xerox, Digital Equipment Corporation, Intel and the ISO/ANSI/IEEE 802.3 standards implemented by numerous companies. The Ethernet™ and 802.3 standards each specify analog collision detection in coaxial media (10Base5 and 10Base2) , serial bit-compare with analog collision detection in broadband coaxial media (i0Broad36) , and logical collision detection in the twisted pair and fiber point-to-point media (lOBaseT, lOBaseF-Draft, respectively) . Most of the Ethernet™ HUB vendors employ analog collision detection on their backplane, in a similar way to that of 10Base5 or l0Base2, where either current or voltage is summed to represent the number of simultaneous transmissions. A voltage or current level that represents two or more simultaneous transmissions is deemed a collision. The precision collision counting per-port allows accurate counting of collision statistics in an Ethernet™ network. In addition, this invention allows association of each collision to the port of its origination by the use of the port-ID. T h i s function is deemed useful for network statistics for management purposes, and this specific function is well known in the LAN industry. Many Ethernet™ implementations from numerous companies purport to provide this function. Older implementations have used the collision condition sometimes detected when the monitoring LAN controller was not an active participant in the collision. This has been proven to be inaccurate and unreliable, because Ethernet™ LAN does not pass this information from one LAN segment to another, when separated by a repeater(s) . Additionally, all known modern implementations use Ethernet™ controller ICs that can receive Ethernet™ transmissions promiscuously and receive transmissions less in length than a minimum sized packet. The limitations with the above approach is that some collisions consist of all preamble patterns (repeating 10 1 0 ..1 0 pattern ) which is ignored and not reported by all known Ethernet™ controller I C s. in addition, some collisions consist of a preamble phase violation such as 1010..100. When a double zero is d etected before a double one (last two bits of the start Frame Delimiter, S FD ) , 1 0 ..1011, all known Ethernet™ controller ignore the subsequent reception, thereby ignoring the collision. Both of t h ese cases are common in Ethernet™ based networks. This invention does not have the aforementioned limitations. A n additional limitation with the above approach resides in not d istinguishing a locally occurring collision, i.e. among ports in a local hub, from a collision resulting elsewhere. S uch collision statistics are less useful when these conditions are not distinguished. A locally occurring collision denotes congestion at the hub where the measurement is being made, whereas a remotely occurring collision denotes congestion at the hub other than where the measurement is being made. This distinction allows users to optimize an Ethernet™ network with a use of Bridges or Routers. The invention distinguishes between local and remote collisions. The Ethernet™ Statistics Counting per-Port supplements a Ethernet™ controller to extend its promiscuously receive d Ethernet™ packet statistics to associate with a particular port of a particular module. This function is deemed useful for network statistics for network management purposes, such as fault isolation, traffic monitoring, etc. , and implementations similar to this are known in the LAN industry. These implementations use a set of registers that parallel the Ethernet™ controller ICs. Each network transmission records the slot-ID in the register. A local intelligence (e. g. a micro-processor) associates the contents of a Slot-ID register to the received packet. When there is no discrepancy between the number of IDs in the Slot-ID register and the number of received Ethernet TM packets, this scheme functions properly. The limitations with the above approach is that some Ethernet™ transmissions result in un-receivable packets in some network collision scenarios due to the inter-packet shrinkage, a well-known problem among knowledgeable users of the IEEE 802.3 standard. A collision free transmission preceded by a multiple station collision may observe an inter-packet gap of a few bit times (a bit time is defined as 100 nano-seconds) . When this type of network scenario occurs., the Ethernet™ controller IC may not receive the subsequent packet following the gap and ignore its activity. An additional limitation with the above approach is that an Ethernet™ controller IC does not have packet buffers to store incoming packets. All known Ethernet TM type controller ICs ignore the activities and do not receive incoming packets. In both of these cases, Slot-ID register is not guaranteed to be consistent with the received packet, and the resulting received packet statistics can be grossly incorrect. This invention closely monitors the Ethernet™ controller IC and its operation to associate the slot and port IDs to the received packet such that the device according to the invention is free of the aforementioned limitations. The half-repeater implementations of Ethernet™ modules describes ISO/ANSI/IEEE 802.3 repeater implementations on the Ethernet™ channel. This invention causes approximately half the repeater limitations resulting from delay variability, thereby allowing a greater number of repeater functions to be present in hubs cascaded in series without violating the limit pertaining to the number of repeated sets by the 802.3 standard. The repeater specified in 802.3 is limited to up to four in cascade. This limitation comes from preamble losses and its regenerati * on, and EthernetTM devi•ce delay variations contributing to a dynamic packet gap (gap between two packets) space. The limitation comes from the shrinkages of the gap. This well-known li •mi•tati•on restri•cts EthernetTM network topology, when interconnected via repeaters. The restriction of four repeaters comes from the accumulated shrinkage of this gap through four repeaters and other media access devices. This phenomena and its restriction of Ethernet™ network topology to up to four repeaters in cascade, is well-known in the Ethernet™ LAN industry. Another scheme known in the industry is to reduce the other device delay variations that contributes to the dynamic packet gap spaces thereby reducing the amount of gap shrinkage. This is called Inter-Packet Gap Shrinkage, IPGS. By reducing the shrinkage enough, more repeaters in cascade may be allowed. This invention describes a novel and unique way to allow more hubs with IEEE 802.3 repeater functions in a direct cascade without exceeding the limits used to set the number of repeater allowances of four in direct cascade. In the Token Ring and FDDI protocols, improvements have been made in establishing the Token rings. A token ring comprises dedicated point-to-point links connecting one station to the next, until a physical ring is formed. Many products that emulate such physical connections are available. It is well known in the industry to provide a physical, electro-mechanical, bypass switches for establishing a ring. Also, it is possible to establish multiple logical rings of compatible speeds of 4 MegaBPS and 16 MegaBPS through the configuration management and the data rate detection. The improvements to the Token Ring protocol involve establishing the rings by means of slot-ID, and by slot-ID and speed detection. The improvements to the FDDI ring protocol involve establishing the rings of parallel data paths by means of slot-ID. According to the invention token bus improvements are provided which allow the ISO/ANSI/IEEE 802.4 Token Bus protocol on the backplane. The ISO/ANSI/IEEE 802.4 Token Bus standard is well understood and used in Manufacturing Automation Protocol. This is a Token Passing protocol in a physical bus and a logical ring topology. Most of the products implementing the Token Bus protocol uses bus topology. The bus topology's limitation is its difficulty to maintain, control, and configured the network, compared to the structured wiring made possible by this invention. To implement Token Bus protocol, a Token Bus channel must provide a means of detecting data corruption and means of broadcasting data transmissions to all the other end-nodes. Both of these are common with the Ethernet™ network protocol. A bigger FIFO is provided to service increased packet size of 32 Kilo-bytes of Token Bus, compared to the 1.5 Kilobytes of Ethernet™, and an additional data line is provided to carry non-data symbols. Ethernet™ modules with these modifications carry packets with Token Bus Protocol. The collision or in this case, data corruption detected is implemented by the detecting two or more simultaneous transmissions. Collision is detected in the same way as described i «n EthernetTM, as disclosed above. In addition, all data transmission from any port are broadcasted to all other ports, except during a collision. During a collision, all data transmissions from' any port are broadcasted to all the ports. According to the invention a Multiple Generic Channel, Multiple Protocol, Backplane Bus Architecture is provided which defines the Network Bus Architecture. This Multichannel Backplane Bus provides the following: 1. A single physical backplane bus which is logically partitioned into a number of generic data channels. Each of these channels consist of a number of wires not dedicated to any particular function. 2. Each of the channels is identical and not dedicated to any protocol. Each of the channels is made available to all users of the bus. 3. Users of the bus may select which of the channels they will communicate on. There is no proscription on users communicating on multiple channels simultaneously. 4. Users of each module may select not to communicate on any channel. This feature allows each module to be isolated from the backplane networks and thereby allows independent networks only limited by the number of modules with a restriction that no isolated modules are connected together on the back-plane. The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming a part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of the invention, its operating advantages and specific objects attained by its uses, reference is made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter in which preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the drawings: Figure 1 is a perspective view of a multiple generic channel concentrator according to the invention; Figure 2 is a schematic representation of a communication system according to the invention; Figure 3 is a schematic representation of the multiple generic channel architecture according to the invention; Figure 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E and 4F are a schematic representation of the module switching for three switching channels; figure 4B is a continuation of the bottom of figure 4A, figure 4C is a continuation of the right side of figure 4A, figure 4D is a continuation of the right side of figure 4B and the bottom of figure 4C, figure 4E is a continuation of the right side of figure 4C and figure 4F is a continuation of the right side of figure 4D and the bottom of figure 4E; Figure 5A and figure 5B are a schematic representation of the module switching for the Ethernet™ channel, figure 5B is a continuation of the bottom of figure 5A; Figure 6A and figure 6B are a schematic representation of a channel logic for Ethernet™ portswitching, figure 6B is a continuation of the bottom of figure 6A; Figures 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D, 7E and 7F are a schematic representation of portswitching for a plurality of channels, figure 7B is a continuation of the bottom of figure 7A, figure 7C is a continuation of the right side of figure 7A, figure 7D is a continuation of the right side of figure 7B and the bottom of SUB STI TUTESHEET figure 7C, figure 7E is a continuation of the right side of figure 7C, and figure 7F is a continuation of the right side of figure 7D and a continuation of the bottom side of figure 7E; Figure 8 is a schematic representation of the management entities according to the invention; Figure 9 is a schematic representation of the collision counting logic showing how MONADD <8:0> is latched as a vector; Figures 10A, 10B and IOC are a schematic representation of the collision counting logic showing how serial bit streams of Ethernet™ are counted; figure 10B is a continuation of the right side of figure 10A, figure IOC is a continuation of the bottom side of figure 10B; Figures 11A and 11B are a schematic representation of the collision counting logic showing how collision is defected; Figures 12A, 12B and 12C are a schematic representation of the collision counting logic showing a programmable logic device of a state machine; Figure 13 is a flow chart of the collision detection logic of the state machine shown in Figure 2.2D; Figure 14 is a flow chart showing the collision detection logic machine and how a long word counter is maintained using 16 bit counters; Figures 15A and 15B are a schematic of an Ethernet™ type statistics counting logic according to the invention; figure 15B is a continuation of the bottom of figure 15A; SUBSTITUTESHEET 17 /2 Figures 16A, 16B and 16C are a schematic of an Ethernet™ type statistics counting logic showing the Ethernet type controller interface according to the invention; figure 16B is a continuation of the right side of figure 16A and figure 16C is a continuation of the right side of figure 16B; Figure 17 is a flow chart showing the Ethernet™ statistics counting logic state machine which performs master and slave bus arbitration; Figures 18A and 18B are a schematic of the implementation logic state machine according to Table 6; figure 18B is a continuation of the right side of figure 18A; Figures 19A, 19B and 19C are a half-repeater logic schematic showing a standard compatible implementation and its interface to half-repeater logic according to the invention; figure 19B is a continuation of the right side of figure 19A, and figure 19C is a continuation of the bottom side of figure 19A. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Referring to the drawings and in particular to Fig. 1, the invention provides a system which employs a unique concentrator generally designated "10". The concentrator includes plural slots 12 which receive various modules or cards for connecting the SUBSTITUTESHEET modules to the back-plane bus arrangement. The backplane bus includes plural generic channels. The modules may include for example fiber modules 14 and twisted pair modules 16. Other modules such as a controller module 18 and modules such as power supply modules, LAN management modules, bridge support modules and the like may also be provided. Modules or cards which provide a connection between a specific type of medium and the concentrator are referred to as media distribution modules below and these may include modules using various known media such as unshielded twisted pair, fiber optic cable and coaxial cable, for example. Fig. 2 depicts a network arrangement employing the concentrator according to the system of the invention. In the example shown in Fig. 2, a concentrator 10 is employed providing three different networks, each network operating using a different protocol such as Ethernet TM, Token Ring, FDDI. In the example shown, the channel A of concentrator 10 operates using twisted pair as the medium using the Ethernet protocol. Accordingly, this generic channel A supports the stations 22, 24 and 26 running Ethernet TM for communication on the network (the first network) . The stations 22, 24 and 26 are each connected to the concentrator 10 over twisted pair media 28. Likewise a different network is operating (the second network) using channel B of the concentrator 10. In this case the channel B of concentrator 10 supports the network including stations 32 and 34 which are connected to the concentrator over workstation connections 36 using the 100 Mbps FDDI protocol. A third network is also provided wherein channel C of the concentrator 10 serves stations 42, 44, 46 which are connected to the concentrator over fiber optic media 38 running the fiber optic Ethernet™ protocol. Each of the link connections 28, 38 and 48 are connected to the concentrator by a media distribution module which is described below. According to the invention, the concentrator 10 may be connected to a backbone 50 and through backbone 50 the concentrator 10 is connected to other concentrators at other locations. According to the example of Fig. 2, a fiber optic Ethernet™ fault tolerant backbone 50 is provided connecting the concentrator 10 to similar concentrators 10' and 10* ■ . The concentrator 10' is connected to a station 27 which is connected to a channel of concentrator 10' making it a part of the network of stations 22, 24 and 26 operating under the Ethernet™ protocol. Similarly, stations 29 may be connected to a channel of concentrator 10' ' (such as channel A) dedicated to the Ethernet™ protocol and providing access to a network of stations 22, 24 and 26. The stations 29 are shown connected to the concentrator 10' ' over coaxial cable 58 for operating using the Ethernet™ protocol. The station 38 is also shown connected to concentrator 10' for connection to the network of stations 32 and 34. Station 38 is connected over link 68 which is provided as a shielded twisted pair link. In this way the network connected to channel B operates using the Token Ring protocol, the network operating under channel C uses the fiberoptic Ethernet TM protocol whereas the network operating under channel A uses the Ethernet™ protocol. This provides three networks functioning concurrently using the same concentrator. In the concentrator 10 the channel A is devoted to Ethernet™, channel B is devoted to Token Ring and channel C is devoted to fiberoptic Ethernet. Fig. 3 shows a schematic representation of the back-plane bus of the concentrator 10. Three generic channels are provided designated 112, 114, and 116. Each of the generic channels 112, 114, and 116 are connected to a plurality of LAN management cards or management modules 118, media distribution cards or modules 120, and bridging and routing modules 122 and 124 for communication between channels (and between networks of different protocols) . Also configured in the network architecture are plural power supply power modules 126 and a control module 128. Generic channels 112, 114 and 116 or LAN Channel A,B,C provide a generic multichannel backplane. The media distribution modules 120 are LAN media connection cards that implement a particular protocol. The modules 120 include ports 119 for connection to a specific medium 121. The bridging and routing modules 122, 124 are store-and- forward devices that either convert one protocol to another, filter (receives all transmissions from one port, and selectively transmits to another port) , or both. The control card 128 implements a central system function of the LAN system according to the invention. The LAN management cards 118 are Network Management cards that integrate the function of prior art hub management cards and LAN- specific management cards. According to the invention, the backplane bus generally designated 100 consists of 96 lines (common wires) . Of these 96 lines, 42 of them are allocated to a common channel used for global maintenance functions and power distribution. The remaining 54 lines are logically divided into three generic channels of 18 lines each. Each of these channels provides all the functionality of a single backplane bus as implemented in the prior art. The limits of the specific implementation (three Generic Data Channels of 18 lines each) are somewhat arbitrary. In principle, according to the invention, channels of any number could be supported on a single backplane bus. The channels 112, 114 and 116 are not dedicated to a particular access method, packet format or data rate; rather, they are provided to the users as generic data channels. Each channel 112, 114 and 116 may be used to provide a single protocol; the assignment of the protocol to one of the channels 112, 114 and 116 may be changed arbitrarily at any time (presuming agreement among all users of the channel) . Table 1 shows a table of pin assignments of a specific implementation of the generic multichannel architecture on the concentrator backplane according to the invention. The clots of the concentrator 10 (for example 17 slots receiving 17 different modules) are provided such that each slot connects a module to the entire backplane bus or in the preferred embodiment to each of the 96 lines (common wires) . Table 1 shows the definition of each of the 96 lines. As can be seen from Table 1, lines 13 through 29 provide channel #1 or channel A. Lines 54 through 61 and 86 thorough 93 provide what is listed as channel #2 or channel B whereas line 67 through 84 provide channel 0 or channel C. TABLE 1 Signal Name or Definition for Each Line Row 1 Row 2 Row 3 0030 12VFAILSAFE " 0062 BUP+12V(Sense only)0094 12VFAILSAFE 0031 GND (extended) 0063 GND(extended) 0095 GND (extended) 0032 +5V (extended) 0064 +5V(extended) 0096 +5V (extended) The remaining lines are used to provide common service to all modules. These are power and grounds, central management channel, unique slot identifications (Slot-ID) , and various system clocks. Some are high speed signals implemented in Bus Transceiver Logic, (BTL) , technology logic levels and some are DC or slow speed signals implemented in CMOS compatible logic levels. These signals do not provide any specific function of a LAN implementation but provide services for the concentrator and its management. Lines with the "~" symbol are terminated for "BTL". The "+" symbol designates CMOS (complimentary metal oxide semiconductor, see number 5) compatible logic levels, and all backplane signals have "B" as a prefix. Signals which are indicated with the designation * are "active low" lines. BNMMACT* = Management module present signal BIDO-4 = Slot ID (5 bits; binary: "0"=gnd, "1"= 5V) BMONADD* = port address (5 MSB's- slot address, 4 LSB's -port #, all open collector) BNMMSI* = serial transmit line (open collector on ALL modules except NMM BNMMSO* = serial transmit line (open collector on NMM) BCLK20 = 20 MHz clock from ControlCard BCLK8 = 8MHz clock from ControlCard BCLK10 = 10 MHz clock from ControlCard BCLK10* = 10 MHz clock (inverted) from ControlCard BRESET = High True (When High, reset is asserted) . High only when ControlCard isNOT present (or when INVOKED by ControlCard) Local = slot specific (i.e. coded on backplane) Out/In = (Output/Input) relative to modules (excluding NMM) Extended = Module edge connector pin that is an MFBL type pin (Make Rist, Break Last) Hub backplane terminations for BTL (Row #1, #2, #3) 4 Each of the users of the backplane bus may elect to transfer data on one or more of the channels 112, 114 and 116 simultaneously. Users offering multiple external interfaces (each providing a particular corresponding protocol) may logically assign these interfaces to any channel, without restrictions on combinations. MODULE SWITCHING TO ANY CHANNEL With the use of Module Channel Switching, users can create a logical network configuration independent of physical network placements. Module switching is made possible by the generic multichannel architecture. Module switching is accomplished by controlling connections from circuits that control a particular protocol to a particular channel. For example, an Ethernet™ type module is connected to a particular backplane channel by its local collision detection and data handing circuits. Although only one path to a channel is active, paths to all the channels to be used need to be present to accomplish the module switching. Figure 4 is a module switching schematic which shows an encoded signal representing the selected active channel. Four possible combinations of the signal can be selected for the generic channels A, B, C, or for the isolated mode. All the other signals represent specific implementation of Ethernet™ protocol on a generic channel. Input signals BID<4:0> represent the Slot-ID read by the module. Input signals ADD<1:0> represent the Port-ID generated by the module denoting the active port ID. Input signals DDATA and DDATAEN represent the actual data and the data enable, respectively, delayed by one clock cycle. The input signal DATAEN represents non-delayed DDATAEN signal. The input signal DGT1 represents the condition when more than one port is active. This denotes the sole collision condition when a module is in isolated mode and acts as an independent and isolated LAN. The input signals LCOL and RCOL represent local collision and remote collision conditions, respectively. The output signals BxM0NADD<8:0>, BxDATA, BxDATAEN, BxLCOL, and BxRCOL, where 'x' represents the number of channels, are signals driven onto the backplane with BTL logic levels. The source for these outputs are common to all. By the means provided by the following signals ENCHNLBO-1, only the selected channel is activated. The input signals ENCHNLB<1:0> represent the selected channel (one of Channel 0, 1,2 or Isolated) in binary encoded form. The decoder U66 translates these encoded signals to generate ENCHNLO- 3 and ENISOLATE output signals. These output signals enable respective channels for LAN communications. The modules switch channels by controlling the connections to each channel through these signals. Output signals to the backplane are routed by the way of enabling the drivers. All .respective inputs from the backplane are connected together through tri-state outputs, effectively multiplexing inputs from the active channel only. Figure 5 shows a programmable logic device U47 and a logic circuit for a particular protocol, Ethernet™, that switches modules to any channels. The input signals STBOUT <03:00> and LDOUT<03:00>, are data enable signals and data output signals, respectively, and represent LAN data from ports. In this case, there are four sets of signals for a four port implementation. The input signals MONADD<8:4> represent the active module Slot-ID and the input signals BID<4:0> represent the module Slot-ID. They are compared by Ull which produces an output (pin 19) that is active when they differ. This is the means for detecting collision using Slot-ID. When more than one port is active at the same t__me, U47 generates the output signal GT1 which forces the output of the Ull to become active. When the output of the Ull becomes active, a collision is detected. The output LCOL is generated from U69 which is delayed by one clock cycle. The signals COLOUT<03:00> are all logically ORed together to produce RCOL, which is delayed through U69. The RCOL signal, when it is asserted, represents a remote collision that occurred elsewhere and is received by a single port. The outputs ADD<1:0> are generated by U47 which denote the active Port-ID. The outputs DSTBOUT<03:00> are generated from U69 which delays the inputs STBOUT<03-00>. For the programmable logic device U47 a DATAEN signal is generated when any of the STBOUTs is active. This logic device U47 also "OR's" together the LDOUTs to generate the DATA signal going to the backplane. In addition, this logic device generates that the signal port 3. ID is invalid. Table 2 below shows the module switching for the programmable array logic implementation of the Ethernet. TABLE 2 047 DEVICE 'pl6VER Z = ■ — • f " Inputs stbouto pin 2; stboutl pin 3; stbout2 pin 4 stbout3 pin 5 stbouto pin 6; stboutl pin 7; stbout2 pin 8; stbout3 pin 9; clklO pin 1; 11 Outputs dataena pin 17; dataenb pin 14; monaddO pin 19; monaddl pin 18; gti pin 16; dgtl pin 13; ddout pin 15; ddataen pin 12; equations ddataen =stboutO # stboutl # stbout2 # stbout3; dataena stbouto # stboutl # stbout2 # stbout3) ; dataenb (stbouto # stboutl # stbout2 # stbout3) ; monaddl stbout2 # stbout3; monaddO stboutl # stbout 3; gtl (stbouto & stboutl) # (stbouto & stbout2) # (stbouto & stbout3) # (stboutl & stbout2) # (stboutl & stbout3 # (stbout2 & stbout3) ; dgtl (stbouto & stboutl) # (stbouto & stbout2) # (stbouto & stbout3) # (stboutl & stbout2) # (stboutl & stbout3) # (stbout2 & stbout3) ; ddout (! !doutO & stbouto) # (ϋdoutl & stboutl) # (! !dout2 & stbout2) # (! !dout3 & stbout3) ; Table 3 below lists the test vectors for the programmable array discussed wi'th reference to Table 2 and Figure 5. TABLE 3 Test Vectors ( [clklO, stbouto,stboutl,stbout2,stbout3]->[ddataen,dgtl] ) CLK,0,0,0,0 CLK,0,0,0,1 CLK,0,0,1,0 CLK,0,0,1,1 CLK,0,1,0,0 CLK,0,1,0,1 CLK,0,0,1,0 CLK,0,1,1,1 CLK,1,0,0,0 CLK,1,0,0,1 CLK,1,0, 1,0 CLK, 1,0, 1,1 CLK,1,1,0,0 CLK,1, 1,0,1 CLK,1,1,1,0 CLK, 1,1,1,1 test vectors [stboutD, stboutl, stbout2, stbout3]-> dataena, dataenb,gtl,monaddl,monaddO] test dout2,dout3 , stbouto, stboutl, stbout2, stbout3] -> [dldout]) CLK, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 -> [0] CLK, 0,1,1,1,1,0,0,0 -> [1] CLK, 0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0 -> [0] CLK, 1,0,1,1,0,1,0,0 -> [1] CLK, 1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0 -> [0] CLK, 1,1,0,1,0,0,1,0 -> [1] CLK, 1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0 -> [0] CLK, 1,1,1,1,0,0,0,1 -> [1] [CLK, 1,1,1,0;0,0,0,0] -> [0]; [CLK, 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0] -> [0]; This inventive arrangement including module switching provides the following improvements over the prior art: l.A multichannel backplane bus allows multiple protocols to share a common backplane bus, and allows multiple data packets to share the bus at any given time. 2. A generic data channel allows complete flexibility for growth and change. At any time the protocol for a channel may be redefined. As new protocols are developed, a method of supporting the new protocols on the generic data channel can be designed and included. Costly protocol converters are not required. 3. An isolated data channel allows complete independence for isolating any of the modules from the backplane and to continue to operate, simultaneously with the backplane operation. PORT SWITCHING Fig. 6 represents the per-channel logic of channel 1 to explain the per-port switching functions. The per-channel logic for Channels 0, 2 and Isolated can be constructed by replacing CHI with CH0, CH2, or CHISO. Each input STBOUTxx is qualified by the channel selection signal ENxx CHyy port. Using Channel 1 for example, the signal STBOUTO qualified by the signal ENO CHI signifies that if the port 0 is configured for the channel 1, the output of the logical AND function through 74AS08 will be active. Similarly, COLOUT<03-00> are modified from Fig. 5 to qualify each input for Channel 1 applicability. Except for the notation change, the signals provide the same functions as description of Fig. 5. Figure 6 describes per channel logic of a particular protocol, Ethernet™, switching ports from one channel to another. EN0_CH1, EN1_CH1,... ENxx_CHyy represent control signals that enable a particular port, xx, for each channel logic yy. The use of the AND gates 160, 74AS08, for multiplexing of the signals from a particular port to a particular channel logic, thereby enables an active data path for the port. Each module employs a set of bus drivers/receivers per channel, or one set of drivers and electric and/or mechanical switches to all channels. By enabling one of the sets of drivers, or enabling a set of switches to a channel, a module is connected and functional on that particular channel. The module switching to any channel can be controlled by hardware switches, or software control, or both. In this particular implementation, three sets of bus drivers/receivers are used. Under software or hardware control, each module is configured to operate on that particular channel. Each module has hardware switches that initialize the channel selection. The software system can confirm or override that selection. The modular switching arrangement according to the invention allows: 1. The switching from one generic channel to another and the assigning of a particular LAN or WAN protocol by doing so. 2. The switching from any active channel to isolated mode, and the ability to continue operating independently from any backplane activity. 3. The' building of a logical network topology with the use of a generic channel as described above. 4. Using hardware switches and software system control to utilize the logical network. Each Physical Port Switching to any Channel allows users to connect to a LAN system without any restrictions. Each port is allowed to be configured to any logical channel present in the LAN system. By this invention, the traditional use of "patch-panels", a collection of connectors and cables to manually control physical connections, is obsolete. Port switching to any channel is accomplished by duplicating the circuits, which control a particular protocol, the same number of times as there are channels (See Fig. 7) . Fig. 7 describes the backplane interface for per-port switching function. Unlike Fig. 4 where all the inputs are common to output signals BxM0NADD<8:0>, BxDATA, BxDATAEN, BxLCOL, and BxRCOL, where small *x' represents the number of channels, each channel has an independent set of input signals produced by respective per-channel logic described in Fig. 6. The suffix • CHI 1 , 'CH2' etc. are used to distinguish one set of input signals from the others (compared to Fig. 4) . The means of enabling and disabling each channel is provided by the signals ENCHNL<2:0> and ENISOLATE to save power from inactive connections. Each protocol circuit owns a path to its own channel. An additional switching function must be performed from a media port to the protocol circuits. By providing' these additional switching circuits from media ports to the protocol circuits, and duplicating protocol circuits, each media port can be configured to switch from one channel to another. A forth protocol circuit is provided to connect ports that are isolated from the backplane. In principal, the number of protocol circuits for isolated ports is not limited. According to the preferred implementation, four sets of protocol circuits and three sets of bus drivers/receivers are used. Under software or hardware control, each port can be configured to operate on a particular channel, or to be isolated. Figure 7 shows a port switching circuit schematic where each channel dependent logic has a suffix of _CHnn, and where nn represents the channel identification. The physical port channel switching feature of the invention allows: 1. The switching of any port from one generic channel to another, and assigning a particular LAN or WAN protocol by doing so. 2. Controlling physical connections between active elements thus replacing "patch-panels". 3. The switching of any port from any active channel to isolated mode with other isolated ports on a same module, with the ability to continue operating independently from any backplane activity. 4. The building of a logical network topology with the use of generic channels as described above. 5. The implementation of using hardware switches and software system controls to utilize the logical network. HUB MANAGEMENT Figure 8 shows the hub management architecture according to the invention, and the management entities present in the system according to the invention. LAN MGMT 181 is the protocol dependent aspect of the network management associated with the LAN management module 118. Agent 182, is the network management entity that controls and reports management status too other agents. CARD CTRL (module control) 183, are module dependent functions and their services. HUB MGR designated 184, is the protocol independent LAN system management. According to the preferred implementation of the invention, the only modules capable of managing the hub (hub master) are Network Management Modules (NMMs)llδ, although in principle any module can be made to have the hub master capability. According to the invention, there can be up to three NMMs in a hub. One will be elected hub master and will manage elements in the hub. The others will manage individual channels. The election algorithm is not limited by the current configuration, i.e. there is no limit to the number or type of potential candidates. The following explains the determination of the hub master: Definitions SCI - serial communications interface. SCI Master - a module which has its Tx line tied to pin 50 of the Hub backplane (BNMMSO-) and its Rx line tied to pin 49 of the Hub backplane (BNMMSI-) . An SCI master is not necessarily the Hub Master. SCI Slave - a module which has its Tx line tied to pin 49 of the Hub backplane (BNMMSI-) and its Rx line tied to pin 50 of the Hub backplane (BNMMSO-) . Hub Master - a module that is an SCI Master and that initiates SCI communications. SCI Packet - a packet of information sent across the serial communication line. ACK - the acknowledgment of an SCI packet. This is an exact copy of the SCI packet which was received by the destination module on its Rx line (it is sent back on its Tx line) . Address Character - the first byte of an SCI packet. The minimum length of an SCI packet is one byte, which is simply an address character. Sleeping Pill - an SCI packet sent by the hub master. If there is no management activity on the SCI bus within a specified time (see below) then the Hub Master sends an address character to all slots in the Hub. This tells the control card and other potential hub masters that the current hub master is still present. If the hub master stops sending packets, a new election will occur. A module must meet the following hardware requirements for it to be configured as a Hub Master. - It must be able to toggle its Tx and Rx lines so that it can be either an SCI master or an SCI slave, and it must be an SCI master after power-up. - It must assert the BNMMACT signal on the Hub backplane (pin 47). If a NMM does not want to be hub master, then it must NOT assert the BNMMACT signal on the Hub backplane, and ONE of the following requirements must be met: A) It must always be an SCI slave (this is recommended, and it is how the control card and current media cards are preferably implemented) ; B) It must not ACK an SCI, a packet that it receives while it is configured as an SCI master (i.e. it doesn't answer an election - see below) . Modules that can be hub masters have three basic SCI states that they can be in (and a fourth undefined state) . These SCI states are listed in Table 4 below. TABLE 4 Hub master I SCI master description 0 0 slave state 0 1 election in progress 1 0 undefined 1 1 hub master state The time-out values for the slave state and the election state are specified below. A summary of the actions taken in different states is listed in table 5. TABLE 5 STATE BREAK received FF received I I echo BREAK character; Hub Master | | resign Hub Mastership; do nothing I I go to Election state +. + if ACKed poll, Election do nothing become Hub Master| else go to Slave state -+- Slave goto Election state do nothing On power-up, the NMMs default to SCI master mode and the control card is in SCI slave mode (the control card is always an SCI slave) . There is a variable on the control card called HubMasterlD, which comes up as -1 indicating that there is currently no Hub master. If the BNMMACT signal is not asserted, the control card assumes that there is no module that wants to be Hub Master, and no election takes place. If or when the BNMMACT signal is asserted, the control card begins the election by issuing a BREAK on its Tx line (BNMMSI-) . The interpretation of the BREAK character is explained later. It then goes through every slot, except its own slot, issuing a one byte SCI packet (the slot address) . If it does not receive an ACK, it tries the next slot. If it receives an ACK, it sets the slot number in the HubMasterlD variable, it sends a one byte SCI packet (address FF[hex]) which tells all other candidates to immediately toggle to SCI slave mode, and it stops initiating any SCI communications. It then answers any inquiries from the hub master and monitors the SCI for activity. If no sleeping pills are received by the control card for a given time (specified below) , the control card assumes that the hub master has failed, and initiates another election. The control card does NOT verify that any SCI communications were initiated by or from the hub master's slot. The hub master can maintain activity on the SCI by periodically issuing sleeping pills as described above. If a module wishes to be the hub master but another module was elected, it can force the current hub master to resign by sending a BREAK character while it is in SCI slave mode. When a module acting as the hub master (not just an SCI master) receives a BREAK, it immediately stops acting as the hub master (i.e. stops initiating SCI communications) and it issues a BREAK character. This will cause all other potential hub masters to toggle to SCI master mode. The lack of SCI activity will cause the control card to time-out and start another election. When other NMMs see a BREAK character while they are configured as SCI slaves, they must toggle to SCI masters and go through a re-election. A BREAK sent by the Hub Master indicates that it is resigning. There is a priority variable on the NMMs which can be set to a value between 0 and 255. This number is defined as the number of election polls to' ignore before answering anelection poll. The number is decremented after each polluntil the value reaches zero or until the election ends. The exception to this is the value 255, which is used to indicate that the module should never answer an election. If this value is the priority, then it is never decremented. According to the preferred implementation, the default value for priority after power-up reset is 255, so the management agent must change this value in order for a hub master to be elected. The priority can be used to ensure, for example, that a desired module is always elected after a power failure. List of the current time-out values: Sleeping pill period - 1 second This is the minimum frequency that the hub master issues sleeping pills. NMM time-out waiting for sleeping pill - 4 seconds Once it reaches this threshold, it toggles to SCI master mode and waits for an election. NMM election time-out - 8 seconds If it doesn't receive an election poll within this period, it assumes that another module won the election and it toggles to SCI slave mode. Control Card sleeping pill time-out - 6 seconds Once it reaches this threshold, it sends a BREAK character and starts an election. Control Card election time-out - infinite If BNMMACT- is asserted, the control card will send SCI packets until one is ACKed. The management method according to the invention allows: 1. The unique election of one Management Module to serve as the hub master. 2. Multiple Management Modules in one hub. This also allows redundant Management Modules providing fault tolerant functioning. 3. The provision of multiple Network Management Agents pertaining to the operation with the Hub Management functions and its election. COLLISION DETECTION Most of the Ethernet™ HUB vendors employ analog collision detection on their backplane, similar to that of 10Base5 or 10Base2, where either current or voltage is summed to represent number of simultaneous transmissions. A voltage or current level that represents two or more simultaneous transmissions is deemed to be a collision. For a 17 slot HUB implementation in accordance with the preferred form of the invention, the number of bits for the slot-ID is set to 5. The Bus Transceiver Logic, BTL, technology chosen for the generic multichannel architecture system according to the invention meets the hardware requirement. Each slot of a backplane has hardwired a unique binary-coded slot-ID numbered from 0 to 16. The collision enforcement signal is assigned a common backplane pin per channel, and s known as a Local Collision. A backplane collision detection method using slot-ID allows parallel bit-comparison with collision enforcement signalling to ensure collision detection on a backplane. In this scheme N represents the number of slots on a backplane, and M represents the number of uniquely assigned bits of slot-ID which are needed to perform this collision detection, M is defined as the smallest integer that satisfies N<2 M" Whenever a transmission occurs from a module onto a backplane channel, a unique slot-ID is enabled onto the backplane, one bit time (100 nanoSec.) before the data and data enable is asserted onto the backplane, allowing for a comparison of Slot-ID (Slot-ID compare) to occur. One bit delay of data is needed to meet the bus timing requirements of the current implementation. At the same time, this unique slot-ID is read by each active module and compared to its own. Backplane circuits for the slot-ID allow multiple bus drivers on a single line. If multiple slot-IDs are driven onto the backplane, a slot-ID on the backplane will not match at least one of the active module's slot-ID. If the read slot-ID is the same as its own, the module does nothing more. If the read slot-ID is different than its own, then the module asserts a collision-enforcement signal. The collision enforcement signal is held active as long as the slot-ID read does not compare with its own slot-ID. All modules monitor this collision enforcement line to detect collisions. Figure 5 also shows the collision detection logic system according to the invention. The signals BID<4:0> are a uniquely encoded Slot-ID signal per module such that the slot 0 of the concentrator has the binary encoding of 00000 and the slot 15 of the concentrator has the encoding of 01111. The signals MONADD<8:4> represent the portion of the active module address that corresponds to the Slot-ID. When a module is active, the Slot-ID is enabled onto the backplane via BxMONADD<8:4> signals, where x represents the channel number. The signals M0NADD<8:4> represent the BxMONADD<8:4> read by the BTL receiver. The signals MONADD<8:4> are compared to BID <4:0> if and only if the module is active in sending data onto the backplane. If these signals differ, a collision is detected. If these signals do not differ, no collision is present. In addition, if a difference is detected, the signal LCOL, local collision detection, is asserted by IC U47 as long as the difference is detected. (Note: Collision detection entails that more than one device is transmitting at the same time.) The reason for such enforcement is that binary coding of Slot-ID and the Wired-OR function provided by the BTL technology guarantees that at least one device is detecting the difference, but this does not guarantee all devices detect the difference. E.g.- a Slot-ID of 00000 colliding with a Slot-ID of 01111 guarantees that the module with Slot-ID of 01111 detects a difference, because the Wired-NOR function would return 00000. The module with Slot-ID of 00000 would not detect any difference between its own Slot-ID and the ID read from the backplane. The hardware requirement for the embodiment of this invention is that the logic family used for asserting the slot-ID, Data, Data Enable, and other support signals be capable of supporting simultaneous assertion of these signals by multiple drivers. The collision detection scheme of the invention allows: 1. Purely digital (binary) functions which offer noise immunity from interfering signals. This offers the most reliable collision detection. 2. Deterministic collision detection, 100% guaranteed. 3. The relay of the precise duration of collision to the rest of the network. Figure 9 shows another collision counting logic schematic which describes how MONADD <8:0> is latched to be used as a vector into a memory address base for collision. The input signal LCOLCNT enables the data latches in U33 and U57 to trap the MONADD<8:0> to be used later by the collision counting circuit, described in Fig. 10. The output signals EADDR<18:1> along with signals ER, EUDS, and ELDS represent signals that interface the monitor address to the address bus of the Ethernet Controller IC, U24, in Fig. 16. Figure 9 is still another collision counting logic schematic which describes how serial bit streams of Ethernet™ are counted, and how collision is qualified. The devices U75 and U81 represent the Programmable Logic Devices (PLD) described in Fig. 13 and 14 respectively as finite state machines. Outputs from U75 control U80, an 8 bit counter. to count a specific number of bits being received for the state machines to determine a correct cut-off point for remote collision counting per port. The signals EDAL<15:0> represent a data bus connection made to U71 and U63, both of which are loadable 8 bit counters. The counters are under the state machine control and their function is to read the contents of the data bus, increment by one, and write the result onto the data bus. This circuit is used to count remote collision per port and the local collision. Figures 13 and 14 describe the functions of programmable logic devices U75 and U81. In Precise Collision Counting per-Port, on every activity detected, the length of the network activity is counted. The counting starts when SFD is detected or when a double zero is detected. Any activity that is less than or equal to 51.1 micro Seconds (equivalent to 511 bits) is considered as a collision, and its source module Slot-ID and port ID is recorded. If local collision has been detected through the collision enforcement signal, as described above, the recorded IDs are discarded, and the local collision statistics are updated. If local collision has not been detected during the entire transmission, and the transmission length was less than or equal to 51.1 μSec, the collision statis¬ tics of that particular module and port is updated using the Slot-ID and Port-ID. The initial implementation of this aspect of the invention is in dedicated digital hardware. A block of RAM is assigned for recording the collision statistics of each port of each of the modules, and one location of RAM is assigned for local collision statistics. Figure 11 is a further collision counting logic schematic which describes how collision is detected, when the local Ethernet™ controller is transmitting. Fig. 11 represents the Ethernet Interface logic that has identical function as Fig. 5, but is implemented for a single port device as in the Management module where one Ethernet Controller IC resides. The signal ETENA is analogous to STBOUTnn in Fig. 5 and represents data enable, and LANCETX is analogous LDOUT in Fig. 5 and represents data. Figure 12 is a still further collision counting logic schematic which contains the PLD Ull that implements a part of the state machine described in Figures 13 and 14. The programmable logic device Ull, among other independent functions, provides the decoder function to translate ENCHNLB<1:0> to ENCHNL<2:0>. For the single port implementation, such as shown here for a Management module, the circuits needed to support the Isolated mode need not be present to implement the Isolate function. The signal ERENA represents the receive data enable and is used in this circuit with U5, an 8 bit counter, to provide a measurement of the receive duration to be used by the finite state machine in Fig. 14. Figure 13 shows a collision detection logic state machine. This finite state machine, FSM, describes how packet length counting is started and how the collision fragment is qualified with the resulting length. When remote collision is detected, the Slot-ID and port-ID are used as a vector into the block of RAM assigned for recording collision statistics, for fetching a count to be updated. A dedicated counter and a set of finite state machine increments the contents and then writes it back to the same location fetched. When a local collision is detected, a pre-determined location containing the local collision count is updated by the same circuit. Figure 14 shows another collision detection logic state machine which describes how a long word (32 bit) counter is maintained using 16 bit counters per Port-ID and Slot-ID signals. Figure 15 shows Ethernet™ statistics counting logic and how the Ethernet™ controller receives buffer memory addresses latched at a proper qualified moment, and how MONADD <8:0> is latched for eventual writing to the memory location. The input signal, GETADD enables the data latches in U72 and U64 to trap the MONADD<8:0> signals to be used later to "stamp" each received data packet with the value of the MONADD, which represents the Port and Slot-ID. The contents of the MONAFF<8:0> are used as data. The outputs from these latches are connected to the data bus, EDAL<8:0>, for this purpose. The control of this operation is described in the state diagram in Fig. 17. The signals EADDR<18:6> represent the address bus of the Ethernet Controller interface. The latches U45 and U36 store the particular address of the packet buffer to be used later as an address for the "stamping of the data packet. The control of this operation is also described in the state diagram in Fig. 17. The precision collision counting per-port aspect of the invention provides: 1. Detection and distinction of Local and Remote Collisions through the use of the collision enforcement signal. 2. Detection of collisions through counting number of bits to 511 bits or 51.1 microSec. after an SFD or preamble phase violation (double zeros) . 3. Collision statistics records per port and per module through the use of Slot and Port ID. 4. Maintenance of the collision statistics via the use of the di •gital hardware (as opposed to EthernetTM controller's IC and Software based) . In counting the Ethernet™ receive statistics per port, for every reception of greater than 51.2 μSec, equivalent to 512 bits which is a minimum sized Ethernet™ packet, a dedicated digital circuit monitors the bus activity of Ethernet™ controller IC. During the monitoring, the receive buffer memory location that an Ethernet™ controller uses, is recorded. Once the count has expired, slot and port IDs are written into the reserved location of the particular received buffer in use. Figure 16 shows the Ethernet TM stati•sti•cs counting logic schematic, the Ethernet™ controller interface and the programmable device that implements the FSM shown in Fig. 17. The Ethernet controller, U24, address demultiplexers, U52 and U56, control bus interface buffers, U76, and PLD U39, implement the state diagram in Fig. 17. The representation of the Ethernet Controller interface in this figure is quite standard and is included to provide clarity. The device U39 and its input makes the Figure 17 state diagram description easier. For reference: EDAL<15:0> represents multiplexed address and data; EADRR<18:0> represents an address bus; UADDR1 represents a single address signal from the host for slave random access to the Ethernet Controller; EDTACK represents an input for the data ready signal; ER represents an input/output for read or write; EDAS represents an input/output for data strobe; EAS represents an output for address strobe to access memory mapped devices; EIRQ represents an output for interrupt request to the host; ECS represents an input for slave access from the host; EUDTACK represents an output for slave access from the host; ERXD represents received data; ECLSN represents local collision; ERENA represents receive enable; CNT256 represents the lenght of ERENA longer than 256 bit times (where bit time is 100 nano-seconds) and then 512 bit times, or every 256 bit times thereafter, and is generated in Fig. 12. For the actual implementation, the Ethernet™ controller from Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) is used. Each receive buffer has a 16 bit word location reserved for the slot and port ID, and each receive buffer starts on a 32-byte boundary to allow an all zero vector to point to the reserved location to write the slot and port ID. If activity is detected, and if the Ethernet™ controller does not provide a direct memoray access (DMA) of the received packet to the receive buffer, the dedicated logic does not write the port or slot IDs. A dedicated logic monitors and counts received network activity. If it exceeds 256 bits beyond the preamble, it knows that the memory transfer the Ethernet TM controller makes i•s to the current buffer, because the AMD controller uses a 32 byte (256 bit) FIFO (First In First Out) scheme to buffer incoming packets. The AMD controller must empty the contents of the FIFO before it overflows. The monitoring logic uses this indication to latch the memory address and writes the port and slot ID's to associate the origin of a particular received packet with the packet itself. The monitoring logic allows: 1. Tight integration of the additional digital logic circuits and the Ethernet™ controller that monitors the Ethernet™ control¬ ler's memory bus and network interface to guarantee consistency and accuracy of per-port and slot ID statistics. 2.The use of slot and port IDs to associate each packet received by Ethernet™ controller ICs to its origin. SYNCHRONOUS ETHERNET WITH HALF REPEATER LIMITATIONS An Ethernet™, or CSMA/CD channel is made possible by synchronizing bit streams of Ethernet TM packets to a central clock, common to all modules connected to the same channel. This is accomplished by a First In First Out (FIFO) system that receives data at one frequency, and transmits at the frequency common to all modules. The FIFO system needed to implement this invention is well understood and widely available in the industry. The synchronous channel allows: 1. The device of the invention to provide a system with no bit losses once an Ethernet™ packet enters into a synchronous Ethernet TM channel. 2. A constant delay to be provided from input to output from the synchronous Ethernet™ channel. In addition, this allows consistent variability, measured as delay of one packet to the next, of equal to or less than one bit times (100 Nano-Second) resulting from a FIFO input to output delay uncertainty. Fi »gure 17 shows the EthernetTM stati•sti•cs counting logic finite state machine (FSM) . The FSM performs master and slave bus arbitration, slave access from a host, and qualification of a receive buffer memory address latch pulse through counting of packet length. For this particular implementation, integration of the above functions makes the logic simpler. The input/output conditions for transferring from one state to another is descried Table 6 shown below: TABLE 6 201 GET ADDL 1 202 CLK 20 203 EBRL*rCLK10#LANCECSL. PREECSL = 1 GET ADDL = GET ADDL#!ERENAH EBGL = 1 MONEASL = 1 S2,S1,S0 = 1 MONONL = 1 • 205 !LANCECS*!CLK10 206 !CLK10*LANCECS/ PREECSL=1 207 CLK10#!LANCECS/ PREECSL=0 208 COLREQ*!CLK10 209 !COLREQ*!CLK10 210 !COLREQ/COLGRN=0 211 !EBRL*(LANCECS#CLK10)/EBGL=1 212 CLK20/EBGL=0 213 EBRL#!EASL#!CLK/EBGL=0 214 EBRL*!CLK10/EBGL=1 215 !EAS*!EBRL*CLK10/EBGL=0 216 EBRL#!EASL#!CLK10/EBGL=0 217 EBRL*!CLK10/EBGL=1 218 EAS1*!EBH*CLK10/EBGL=0 219 EBRL#!EASL#!CLK10/EBGL=0 220 ERL*!CLK10/EBGL=1 221 !EASL*!EBRL*CLK10/EBGL=0 222 EBRL#!EASL#!CLK10/EBGL=0 223 EBRL*!CLK10/EBG=1 224 EASL*!EBRL*CLK10/EBGL=0 225 EBRL#!EASL#!CLK10/EBGL=0 226 EBRL*!CLK10/EBGL=1 227 !EASL*1EBRL*CLK10/EBGL=0, GETADD = GETADDL & lerh 228 EBRL#!EASL#!CLK10/EBGL=0 229 EBRL*1CLK10/EBGL=1, GETADD = GETADDL 230 !EBRL*EASL*!CNT256L*CLK10*GETADDL /EBGL=0, GETADDL = GETADDL COLONEKE 231 EBRL#!CLK10/EBGL=0, GETADDL=0, MONEASL=l 232 EBRL*!CLK10/EBGL=1, GETADDL=0, MONOEL=l, MONEASL=l 233 CLK20/EBGL=1, GETADDL=0, MONOEL=0, MONEASL=0 234 EDTACK/EBGL=1, GETADDL=0, MONOEL=0, MONEASL=0 235 !EDTACK/EBGL=1, GETADDL=0, MONOEL=0, MONEASL=l 236 !EDTACK/EBGL=1, GETRADDL=0, MONOEL=0, MONEASL=l 237 EDTACK/EBGL=1, GETRADDL=1, MONOEL=0, MONEASL=l / = OUTPUT, ! = NOT, & = AND, # = OR Figure 18 is a half-repeater logic showing programmable logic devices that implement the logic shown in Table 7 FSM. The programmable logic devices represented in Fig. 18 implements the finite state machines described in Table 7. The references to U10, U5 and U16 in Table 7 correspond to the devices in this figure. All three devices U10, U5 and U16 function in synchrony to perform the function of properly formatting the data packet originating from the Ethernet Repeater IC, U39 in Fig. 19, and transmitting to the backplane through the circuits described in Fig. 4 or Fig. 7, depending on module or per-port switching option. In addition, the devices also detect data from the backplane when it is not transmitting to the backplane and transmit data from the backplane to each of the ports on the module without loss of any preamble bits and without any variation in delay from the backplane to the port. The signal TENN represents data enable from the Ethernet Repeater IC. The signal MTXD represents data associated with TENN from the same IC. The signals CLDATA and CLDATAEN represent, clocked data coded using Manchester Coding, and associated data enables to be transmitted to the ports. The signal RXDATAENA represents the data enable received from the backplane. The internal logic definition of U5, U10, U16, may be provided as all are programmable logic devices. The syntax used is of ABEL™, a logic compiler from the Data I/O Corporation. The FSMs implement data transfer functions as described to and from the backplane, and work in conjunction with a standard IEEE 802.3 repeater, and their particular actions are as specified in the standard. Half-repeater implementations of Ethernet™ Modules according to the invention allow more 802.3 repeaters in cascade in conjunction with the Ethernet TM network channel. When an Ethernet™ media port is connected to a repeater that is connected to a Ethernet™ network channel, any activity arriving at the input of the media port has a preamble loss. The repeater regenerates the lost preambles and sends the data out to the backplane. The Ethernet™ channel then carries the data without any preamble loss and wi •thout delay vari«abi•li•ty, because the EthernetTM channel requires all signals to be synchronous to the master clock of a hub. Delay of data from the first bit to the last is fixed. Once an Ethernet™ activity has passed through a repeater to a Ethernet™ channel via a synchronous interface, it has suffered one repeater input's worth of variability that contributes to the IPS. After data is transferred from one module to another, the data is sent out by another module. All modules containing a repeater function transmit data without any bit loss. Thus the transmission out of the Ethernet™ channels to another module does not suffer any variability that contributes to the IPGS (Inter Packet Gap Shrinkage) . Thus multiple repeaters connected to an Ethernet™ channel act as one repeater. The advantages of half repeater implementations are: Through the use of the synchronous Ethernet channel, multiple repeaters use only one repeater penalty. 2. The use of a repeater to provide approximately half the dynamic packet gap variation due to preamble losses and by network device delay variations. 3. Multiple repeaters may be used to act as a single repeater, and offers approximately one half the IEEE 802.3 repeater limitations. Figure 19 describes one implementation of this half-repeater logic invention using lOBaseT, Ethernet on twisted pair media, repeater IC, U39. This drawing does not describe unique aspects of the half-repeater invention but is included to add clarity and provide the interconnection between an Ethernet Repeater IC and the stae diagrams in Table 7 and Fig. 18. TOKEN RING IMPLEMENTATIONS AND CONCEPTS The token ring improvement of the invention includes means for establishing a logical ring by the use of a Slot-ID scheme. The requirements are that each slot be coded with a unique Slot-ID, and the number of slots be equal to or less than the number of available lines assigned to the token ring. Each token ring module in a hub recognizes the Slot-ID, and transmits a repeated token ring signal onto the line corresponding to its Slot-ID, and listens to all other lines. To establish a logical ring, each module will pick a unique and active module from which to receive. Although many algorithms based on a unique Slot-ID scheme that meets such a requirement may be employed ,one algorithm is preferred. According to the preferred algorithm, each module picks the closest active neighbor with the largest Slot-ID less than its own from which to receive. If no such neighbor exists, it picks the active neighbor with the largest Slot-ID greater than or equal to its own. The 17 squelch outputs and the 17 transmit select lines drive the backplane ring control element, which uses these lines to determine which of the 17 backplane lines to receive its data from. As with the transmit decoder, this function can be overridden by network management. The operation of this element is basically as follows: Let "TYSEL(i)" = Line selected for transmission (0 to 17) Let "RXON(i)" = RX activity sense for each of backplane lines (1 to 18; active high) Let "RXSEL(i)" = Line selection for reception (0 to 17) The algorithm according to the invention uses the following steps: 1. One TSEL line must be uniquely active. Assign this the value N. 2. If any of RXON(l) to RXON(N-l) is active, set RXSEL to the "highest" line which has RXON(i) active (ie., N-l, N-2, etc. in order of preference) . 3. If none of RXON(l) to RXON(N-l) is active, set RXSEL to the highest line of RSEL which is active. This algorithm should run continuously to build and maintain the ring, even if cards are removed from or added to the hub. The implementation can use a static array of logic to generate the RXSEL(i) with the following equations: RXSEL(i) = RXON(i) & (TXSEL(i+l) + (TXSEL(i+2) & !RXON(i+l)) + (TXSEL(i+3) & !RX0N(i+2) & !RXON(i+l) ) + ... + = logical OR & = logical AND ! = logical NOT where the equation wraps line 17 to line 0 when TX0N(17) is reached, and ends with a term which contains TXSEL(i) and all RXON signals except RXON(i) are inactive. A means of establishing two logical rings by the use of Slot-ID and data rate detection is also incorporated. The requirements are the same as the above described Ring Establishment using Slot-ID Each token ring module in a hub recognizes the Slot-ID, and transmits a repeated token ring signal to the line corresponding to its Slot-ID, and listens to all other lines. To establish two separate logical rings containing different modules, each module will pick a unique and active module with the same data rates from which to receive. Thus each module detects activity, and data rate at both 4 Mega Bits/Sec and 16 Mega Bits/Sec. Allowing for jitter build-up, and implementational margins, 4 Mega Bits/Sec token ring cannot present a data edge any faster than 125 nSec nor slower than 1000 nSec. 16 Mega Bits/Sec token ring cannot present a data edge any faster than 31.25 nSec nor slower than 250 nSec. Through the use of a frequency discriminator between 31.25 to 125 nSec, or 250 nSec to 1000 nSec, with proper allowances for jitter and engineering tolerances, the data rate can be positively detected. The ring is established in exactly the same manner as the above described Ring Establishment using Slot-ID, with the exception that the data rate is compared each time the presence of token ring activity is tested. If the data rate is different, the activity, if detected, is ignored. In principle, there is no limitation on the number of Rings formed by this method. If a future token ring standard merits an 8 or 32 mega bits per second (BPS) or any other data rate, this feature of the invention allows the same multiple ring establishment, each ring consist of compatible data rates, using Slot-ID. A single data rate detector is employed to indicate 4 megaBPS versus 16 megaBPS. The data rate is detected by a edge-triggered retriggerable mono-stable multi-vibrator (one-shot) , connected to a token ring data line on the backplane. The pulse width, or the time constant, is set to be nominally 50 Nano-Seconds +/-10%. A second circuit, a digital sampling circuit with a sampling period of 50 nSec, counts the duration of the output from the one-shot. During a Timer, No-Token period, as defined in IEEE 802.5-1989 standard, any contiguous output of 800 nSec (allowing for margins, where the minimum sized frame is an abort sequence of two octets or 1000 ns) or more is detected, data rate for that token ring line is deemed to be 16 Mega Bits Per Second, otherwise, 4 Mega Bits Per Second. A means of establishing multiple logical rings on a backplane by the use of configuration management is another feature of the invention. The requirements are that each slot be coded with a unique Slot-ID, such that configuration management entities may individually address each module. By the use of the configuration management function, provided by a communication line, or by hardware switches, each module can be configured to receive from a particular line. Although not a requirement, each module always transmits to a line corresponding to its own slot-ID, because additional freedom of assigning transmit lines to any arbitrary backplane line complicates logic implementations without added benefit. Each module reports its own data rate to the management function. The management then controls interconnection of each module to another. Via this configuration control, any number of rings can be established, only limited by the number of modules and the backplane communication line. This allows multiple logical Token Rings on a backplane through the configuration management. According to the invention, Software or Hardware Control of the configuration is provided for the purpose of creating the Multiple Ring establishment. This allows multiple logical rings of compatible speeds of 4 MegaBPS and 16 MegaBPS on a backplane through the configuration management. FDD IMPLEMENTATIONS AND CONCEPTS Ring Establishments using Slot-ID for FDDI Concentrator Implementations and Concepts is also provided according to the invention. FDDI, of 125 megabaud, or 100 megaBPS is signaled on a set of five data lines in parallel.. Before any data transmission is allowed, each FDDI module establishes the ring by contending for an inactive set of data lines. The sets of data lines are predetermined, and its logical order is established. If a module monitors activity on all sets of data lines, it does not contend for any set of data lines. If a module detects an inactive set of data lines while seeking from the lowest order to the highest order of sets, it enables its own Slot-ID onto the set of data lines. For an arbitrarily long duration denoted as TC, the set of data lines are monitored and compared with its own Slot-ID. If there is no discrepancy during this time, the module transmits to the set of data lines which it now owns. If there is a discrepancy, the module waits for the duration equalling the Slot-ID times TC. Then it reverts back to listening to a set of data lines for activity. Once a module owns a set of data lines, it immediately starts sending IDLE, and starts the Ring Establishment process. Ring is established in the same way as the above in Token Ring establishment. To establish a logical ring, each module will pick a unique and active module from which to receive. Each module picks the closest active neighbor with the highest order less than its own from which to receive. If no such neighbor exists, i picks the active neighbor with the highest Slot-ID greater than or equal to its own. The following are important details of the FDDI implementation ring establishments according to the invention: 1. A set of data lines are provided to signal a 125 megabaud signal. 2. The preferred implementation provides five data lines per set, and three sets per channel. 3. Slot-ID is used to detect contention of data lines and Slot-ID is used to provide a unique non-overlapping waiting period. This invention allows an FDDI ( Fiber Data Distribution Interface protocol) ring to be established by using a unique Slot-ID scheme to resolve multiple FDDI modules contending for the same set of data lines. Multiple logical rings on a backplane are provided by the use of configuration management. The requirements are that each slot be coded with a unique Slot-ID, such that configuration management entities may individually address each module to configured modules. TOKEN BUS IMPLEMENTATIONS AND CONCEPTS To implement the Token Bus protocol, a Token Bus channel must provide a means of detecting data corruption and a means for broadcasting data' transmissions to all the other end-nodes. Both of these are common with the Ethernet™ network protocol. If a bigger FIFO scheme is provided to service frequency mismatch of the increased packet size of 32 Kbytes of Token Bus, compared to the 1.5 Kbytes of Ethernet™, and an additional data line is provided to carry non-data symbols, the same Ethernet™ module backplane interface with these modifications, can carry the Token Bus protocol. The collision, or in this case data corruption, is detected and enforced by detecting two or more simultaneous transmissions. Collision is detected in the same way as the above-described Collision Detection using Slot-ID. In addition, all data transmissions from any port are broadcast to all other ports, except during a collision. During a collision, all data transmissions from any port are broadcast to all the ports. The implementation of the Token Bus needs one additional data line to provide non-data symbols in addition to the binary zero and binary one. The FIFO depth is increased from 4 bits to 52 bits to accommodate the frequency mismatch of packet length of up to 32 kilobytes, as allowed in the IEEE 802.4 Token Bus standard. While a specif_c embodiment of the invention has been shown and described in detail to illustrate the application of the principles of the invention, it will be understood that the invention may be embodied otherwise without departing from such principles.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A communication network serving a plurality of users, the system comprising: a plurality of identical communication channels for simultaneous communication between different groups of users, each channel configurable to any one of a plurality of communication protocols. management means for managing and controlling the communication system; 2. A communication network in accordance with claim 1, wherein: said channels are generic channels configurable to any of a number of protocols without changing said management means. 3. A communication network in accordance with claim 1, wherein: a media distribution module connecting users to said communication channels, including switching means for isolating selected users from said communication channels for simultaneous and separate communication. 4. A communication network in accordance with claim 1, further comprising: a media distribution module connecting users to said communication channels, including protocol means, designed for a specific protocol, connectable to one or more of said plurality of channels for configuring said one or more of said plurality of channels to said specific protocol. 5. A communication network in accordance with claim 4, further comprising: a plurality of media distribution modules connectible to one or more users, each of said media distribution modules including a plurality of ports, each of said ports being individually selectably connectible to one of said plurality of channels. 6. A communication network in accordance with claim 4, further comprising: a plurality of media distribution modules connected to one or more users, each of said media distribution modules including module switching means connecting or disconnecting an associated one of said media distribution modules with one of said plurality of channels. 7. A communication network in accordance with claim 6, wherein: said protocol means configures one of said channels to said specific protocol if said channel is not already configured to a protocol when said module switching means connects said media distribution module to said one of said channels. 8. A communication network in accordance with claim 6, wherein: disconnecting of said media distribution module from all channels causes said media distribution module to be in an isolation mode, said media distribution module in said isolation mode operates independently of said channels. 9. A communication network in accordance with claim 6, wherein: said module switching means creates a logical network topology by selectively connecting and disconnecting said modules from said channels by said module switches. 10. A communication network in accordance with claim 6, wherein: said module switches are hardware switches under a software network control. 11. A communication network in accordance with claim 4, further comprising: port switches in said media distribution module for selectively connecting and disconnecting individual ports of said media distribution module to said plurality of communication channels. 12. A communication network in accordance with claim 11, wherein: said protocol means of said media distribution card, upon connection of any one of said individual ports of said media distribution module to one of said plurality of channels causes said connected channel to be configured to said specific protocol if said connected channel has not been previously configured. 13. A communication network in accordance with claim 11, wherein: said port switches also connect and disconnect individual ports of said media distribution module to other individual ports of said media distribution module, said port switches can connected said connected individual ports to one of said channels for communication on said channel; and said port switches can also isolate said connected individual ports from said channels for communication only between said connected individual ports. 14. A communication network in accordance with claim 11, wherein: said port switches create a logical network topology by selectively connecting and disconnecting said ports from said channels. 15. A communication network in accordance with claim 11, wherein: said port switches are hardware switches under a software network control. 16. A communication network in accordance with claim 1, further comprising: LAN management modules in said management means for each of said plurality of communication channels said LAN management modules monitoring and controlling communication on said plurality of channels, one of said LAN management modules acting as a hub master in said management means for controlling and monitoring physical aspects of the communication network. 17. A communication network in accordance with claim 16, wherein: said management means includes hub management election means for electing one of said modules to serve as hub master. 18. A communication network in accordance with claim 16, wherein: a plurality of modules in the communication network are able to serve as hub master and an election is performed to determine which of said modules will serve as hub master, modules able to become hub master and not chosen are made redundant. 19. A communication network in accordance with claim 18, wherein: said hub master continuously exercises authority and a break in said exercising of authority causes a new election by said hub master election means. 20. A network communication network, serving a plurality of users, the network comprising: a management means for managing and controlling the communication network; a plurality of communication channels; a plurality of slots on said plurality of communication channels, each of said slots having a unique slot-ID; modules connected to said communication channels by said slots; slot-ID transmit means associated with each port for enabling said unique slot-ID of one of said plurality of channels, when said one of said modules transmits on said channels; slot-ID receive means associated with each for reading said one channel when transmitting, said slot-ID receiving means comparing a slot-ID read on said one channel with said unique slot- ID to determine if contention for a channel exists. 21. A communication network in accordance with claim 20, wherein: said slot-ID receive means issues a collision enforcement signal if said read slot-ID does not compare to said unique slot- ID, and said management means uses said collision enforcement signal to distinguish between local and remote collisions. 22. A communication network in accordance with claim 20, wherein: one of said modules is a media distribution module having ports through which users transmit and receive data, each port having a unique port ID; said management means recording collision statistics for said ports and said modules through the use of slot and port ID. 23. A communication network in accordance with claim- 22, wherein: said collision statistics are recorded by the use of digital hardware. 24. A communication network in accordance with claim 22, further comprising: Ethernet™ controller means for controlling and monitoring communication, and recording statistics, said Ethernet™ controller means associating all received data packets with a corresponding slot-ID and port-ID for consistency and accuracy of said port-ID and slot-ID statistics. 25. A communication network in accordance with claim 24, wherein: said slot-ID and port-ID are used by said Ethernet™ controller to associate each packet with an origin. 26. A communication network serving a plurality of users, the network comprising: a management arrangement for managing and controlling the communication network; a plurality of communication channels; a media distribution module connectable to said plurality of communication channels and having ports through which users transmit and receive data; and activity detection means for indicating a collision when length of activity on a network is less than a predetermined time. 27. A communication network serving a plurality of users, the network comprising: a management means for managing and controlling the communications network according to an EthernetTM protocol; a plurality of communication channels managed and controlled by said management means; synchronizing means for synchronizing bit streams of EthernetTM packets to a central clock, said synchronizing means including a first in first out (FIFO) memory device; multiple repeaters on one of said channels; and said synchronizing means causing said multiple repeaters to generate only one repeater penalty. 28. A communication network in accordance with claim 27, wherein: said synchronization means causes said multiple repeaters to generate approximately half of a dynamic packet gap variation due to preamble losses and network delay variations. 29. A communication network serving as network management according to claim 20, wherein: said management means controls and monitors a Token Ring protocol on said communication channels, said management means establishes a logical ring using said unique slot-ID(s) . 30. A communication means according to claim 29, wherein: said logical ring is established by each module choosing a closest module having a largest slot-ID less than said choosing module, and if there is no such module then such choosing module chooses a module with a slot-ID greater than or equal to said slot- ID of said choosing module. 31. A communication network according to claim 29, further comprising: rate detection means for detecting a rate of communication on said communication channels said logical ring established by using slot-ID's and modules having similar communication rates. 32. A communication network in accordance with claim 29 wherein: said management means establishes a plurality of logical rings. 33. A communication network in accordance with claim 29, further comprising: module switches connecting said modules to said communication channels; said management means also establishing said logical ring by controlling said module switches. 34. A communications network in accordance with claim 20, wherein: said management means controls and manages an FTDI protocol, and ownership of one channel of said plurality of communication channels is established by all modules having ownership means for, transmitting said unique slot-ID onto an inactive channel of said communication channels, listening for contention on said inactive channel and if no contention establishing ownership of said inactive channel. 35. A communication network in accordance with claim 34, wherein: after said ownership means have established ownership of said communication channels a logical ring is established by each module choosing a closest module having a largest slot-ID less than said choosing module, and if there is no such module then said choosing module chooses a module with a slot-ID greater than or equal to said slot-ID of said choosing module. 36. A communication network in accordance with claim 20, wherein: said management means controls and monitors a Token Bus protocol, and module switches connecting said modules to said communication channels, said management means also establishing said logical ring by controlling said module switches. 37. A communication network in accordance with claim 20, wherein: said management means controls and monitors an FTDI protocol; and module switches connecting said modules to said communication channels, said management means also establishing said logical ring by controlling said module switches. 38. A communication network in accordance with claim 35, further comprising: Ethernet™ devices with an increased first in first out (FIFO) memory device for transmitting Token Bus protocol.

Inventors: ABRAHAM MENACHEM, BARTOLINI DAVID, BEN-MEIR SAMUEL, CARMI ILAN, COOK JOHN L III, HART IRA, HERMAN ALEX, HOROWITZ STEVEN E, KIM YONGBUM, LINDE YOSEPH, RAMELSON BRAIN, ROHBERG RICHARD, SAUSSY GORDON, SHOHET YUVAL, ZHOVNIRIVSKI IGOR, ABRAHAM, MENACHEM, BARTOLINI, DAVID, BEN-MEIR, SAMUEL, CARMI, ILAN, COOK, JOHN, L., III, HART, IRA, HERMAN, ALEX, HOROWITZ, STEVEN, E., KIM, YONGBUM, LINDE, YOSEPH, RAMELSON, BRAIN, ROHBERG, RICHARD, SAUSSY, GORDON, SHOHET, YUVAL, ZHOVNIRIVSKI, IGOR
Applicants: CHIPCOM CORP, CHIPCOM, CORP.
Application year: 1991
Main classification: G06F13
IPC codes: G06F13, H04L12, H04L29