SWEETENING COMPOSTIONS COMPRISING SUCRALOSE AND ISOMALTULOSE

Abstract: Sweetening synergy is is obtained by combining sucralose and isomaltulose.

Description: This invention relates to sweetening compositions comprising sucralose and isomaltulose, the compositions exhibiting synergy, i.e. providing greater sweetness than would be expected from simple summation of the sweetness contributed by the component sweetening agents. Sucralose (1,6-dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl 4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside) is a high intensity sweetener disclosed in British Patent No. 1,543,167. Isomaltulose, also known as Palatinose (6-0(α- D -glucopyranosyl)- D -fructofuranose), is a sweet disaccharide which can be used as a substitute for sucrose as disclosed in British Patent No. 2,066,639 B. Synergy is exhibited by compositions comprising sucralose and certain other high intensity sweeteners having an accompanying bitter taste, particularly saccharin, acesulfame-K and stevioside (GB 2,098,848 B), and in compositions comprising sucralose and cyclamate (GB 2,154,850 B). Synergy is not found in compositions consisting of sucralose and the dipeptide high intensity sweetener aspartame, although the quality of sweetness is improved (GB 2,153,651 B). Furthermore, no synergy is found between sucralose and sucrose (GB 2,153,651 B). In our co-pending British Patent Application No. GB 2 210 545A, we disclose synergistic combinations of sucralose and certain saccharides, including fructose, glucose, maltose and other gluco-oligosaccharides and sugar alcohols. We have now found that synergy extends to combinations of sucralose and isomaltulose. The scale of synergy is surprisingly high considering that with sucrose there is no significant synergy. Thus combinations of isomaltulose and sucralose can show an increased sweetening power of about 13%. According to the present invention there is provided a sweetening composition comprising sucralose and isomaltulose, the relative sweetness contribution provided by the sucralose and the sweet saccharide being from 4:1 to 1:4. By the term "sweetening composition", we mean a composition for use in sweetening foodstuffs, beverages, etc., e.g. sweetening tablets, sweet powders or granules for sprinkling on foods, concentrates for use in the manufacture of beverages, etc. According to a further feature of the present invention there is provided a method of sweetening an oral composition comprising incorporating therein sucralose and isomaltulose such that the relative sweetness contribution provided by the sucralose and the isomaltulose is from 4:1 to 1:4. A ratio of from 3:2 to 2:3 is generally most useful, depending on the desired balance between bulk and sweetness. By the term 'oral composition' we mean any substance intended to be taken into the mouth. The term includes ingestible compositions such as foodstuffs, medicaments, confectionery, beverages etc. and also non-ingested materials such as mouthwashes and toothpaste. According to a further feature of this invention there is provided an oral composition sweetened with a sweetening composition as defined above. Examples of such compositions include, in particular, soft drinks (cola, carbonated fruit drinks etc), confectionery and baked goods. The synergy level quoted above is the increased sweetening power per unit weight obtained for the composition as a percentage of the expected degree of sweetening power (i.e. the sum of the sweetening power theoretically provided by each of the sweeteners). An alternative and more useful measure of synergy is the percentage saving, that is to say the difference between the amount actually needed to obtain a certain degree of sweetness and the theoretical amount needed, expressed as a percentage of the theoretical amount needed. On this basis the saving with isomaltulose is about 11.6%. The following examples illustrate the invention: Example 1 Measurement of synergy Synergy was measured by determining the concentration of each sweetener or sweetener combination having the same degree of sweetness as sucrose at a given concentration i.e. the equisweet point. The materials used were as follows: Sucrose (granulated sugar) - Tate & Lyle Sugars Isomaltulose (Palatinose, TM) - Mitsui Sugar Co., Japan Sucralose - Tate & Lyle Speciality Sweeteners Sweeteners were prepared as solutions in tap water (pH 8±1) and served at a temperature of approximately 20°C. Concentrations are expressed as % (w/v). The standard was a 5% solution of sucrose (Tate & Lyle granulated sugar in Reading tap water, pH about 8.0). The concentrations of sucralose, isomaltulose and sucrose which were equisweet to the standard sucrose solution were measured by taste panels using the constant stimulus paired comparison method (Amerine, Pangborn & Roessler, "Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food", Academic Press New York). A series of five or more concentrations of increasing intensity were prepared for each sweetener so that the mid-concentration was approximately the same sweetness as the sucrose control. Coded samples were presented in pairs to panellists, one of the pair being one of the test solutions and the other the sucrose control. Order of presentation of the pairs was randomised and within each pair half the panellists received the standard sucrose first, half the test solution first. Panellists were asked to choose the sweeter sample. "No difference" replies were allocated half to the sucrose control, half to the test sample. Between sample pairs a one minute rest period was enforced. Panellists were instructed to rinse with water between pairs. The % panellists choosing the test sweetener level as sweeter than the sucrose standard was plotted against the % sweetener concentration. The results were subjected to probit analysis and for each solution the test concentration was calculated at which 50% of the responses would indicate the test sweetener to be sweeter than the sucrose standard: this is taken as the equisweet point or sucrose equivalent value (SEV). The results were as follows: Sucralose 0.00842% Isomaltulose 13.3% To determine the synergy of combinations of sucralose and the other sweetener, compositions were mixed which contained a theoretical 5% SEV (based on the SEVs listed above) with an equal sweetness contribution from each sweetener. Thus, since the 5% SEV for sucralose was 0.00842% and the 5% SEV for isomaltulose was 13.3%, a theoretical 50:50 sweetness contribution mixture with a 5% SEV would contain 0.00421% sucralose and 6.65% isomaltulose, i.e. a weight ratio of 1 to 1580. This mixture was then dissolved at various concentrations and tested in the same way as described above to obtain a 5% SEV for each mixture. The percentage saving over the theoretical amount required can then be calculated as A-B A x 100 or alternatively the percentage increase in sweetening power can be calculated A-B B x 100 where A is the concentration of one component in the blend required theoretically and B is the concentration of that component of the blend found experimentally to be necessary. On this basis the following values were obtained for 50/50 sweetness contributions from: 1. Sucralose/sucrose SEV = 0.00415% sucralose + 2.467% sucrose saving = 1.33% 2. Sucralose/isomaltulose SEV = 0.00372% sucralose + 5.88% isomaltulose saving = 11.6%. Example 2 Carbonated lemonade sweetened to the equivalent of 10% sucrose Sweetness contribution ratio of sucralose: isomaltulose = 4: 1 Example 3 Ready to drink strawberry-flavoured milk sweetened to the equivalent of 2.5% sucrose Skimmed milk 96.756% Emulsifier, Recodan CM* 0.200% Colour, Ponceau 4R (E124) 0.002% Flavour, Strawberry E4468L** 0.100% Sucralose 0.002% Isomaltulose 2.940% *Grinstead Products Limited **Fries and Fries Limited Sweetness contribution ratio of sucralose: isomaltulose = 1: 1 Example 4 Sweetening compositions comprising sucralose and isomaltulose Sweetener compositions are prepared by: (a) mixing 2350 g isomaltulose with 1.49 g sucralose. The resulting composition has a sweetening power equivalent to that of 2 Kg of sucrose. The synergy between isomaltulose and sucralose results in a saving of 11.6% (theoretical amounts of each component if no synergy existed are 2600 g isomaltulose and 1.68 g sucralose, each providing the equivalent of 1 Kg sucrose). (b) mixing 1998 g isomaltulose with 1.76 g sucralose. The resulting composition has a sweetening power equivalent to that of 2 Kg of sucrose; i.e. they both provide about the same amount of sweetness per unit weight. The synergy between isomaltulose and sucralose results in a saving of about 10% (theoretical amounts of each component if no synergy existed are 2220 g isomaltulose and 1.96 g sucralose; isomaltulose providing about 40% and sucralose about 60% of the sweetness). Example 5 Sponge Cake Ingredients Margarine 227 g Product of Example 4(b) 227 g 4 Eggs 230 g Self raising flour 227 g The margarine and sugar (product of Example 4(b)) were creamed together and the eggs were beaten in, then the flour was folded in and the mixture was baked for 25 minutes at 180°-190°C. Example 6 Meringues Ingredients Egg Whites (fresh) 30 g Product of Example 4(b) 70 g The egg white was whipped then the product of Example 4(b) was folded in. The mixture was piped onto baking trays in 3 cm diameter portions and cooked at 65°C for 90 minutes. Example 7 Filling for bakery products Ingredients (parts per 100) Fat (with emulsifier) 34.6 Water 10.0 Isomaltulose 52.2 Sucralose 0.008 Milk powder 2.89 Salt 0.302 The ingredients were mixed together for 4 minutes, using an electric mixer. Sweetness contribution ratio of sucralose:isomaltulose = 1:4

Claims: A sweetening composition comprising sucralose and isomaltulose, the relative sweetness contribution provided by the sucralose and the isomultulose being from 4:1to 1:4. A sweetening composition according to Claim 1, in which the said relative sweetness contribution is from 3:2 to 2:3. A method of sweetening an oral composition comprising incorporating therein sucralose and isomaltulose, such that the relative sweetness contribution provided by the sucralose and the sweet saccharide is from 4:1 to 1:4. A method according to Claim 3, in which the said relative sweetness contribution is from 3:2 to 2:3. A method according to Claim 4 wherein the oral composition is a beverage or a confectionery product. An oral composition sweetened with a sweetening composition according to Claim 1 or Claim 2. An oral composition sweetened by a method according to Claim 3. An oral composition according to Claim 6 or Claim 7 in the form of a beverage or confectionery product.

Inventors: BEYTS, PAMELA KAY
Applicants: TATE & LYLE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
Application year: 1990
Main classification: A23G3
IPC codes: A21D2, A23G3, A23L2, A23L1