Surface acoustic wave device

Abstract: A surface acoustic wave device comprises a piezoelectric substrate (1) and a plurality of electrode fingers (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8) which are located on the piezoelectric substrate along the propagation direction of a surface acoustic wave (10). The electrode fingers are located on the piezoelectric substrate at a pitch of about 1.5λo/2,λo indicating a wavelength of a surface acoustic wave with a frequency equivalent to the center frequency of the surface acoustic wave device. The width of each of the electrode fingers is about 1.5λo/4. Every other electrode finger (3) on the substrate is electrically independent of an external circuit (5, 9). Since the width of electrode fingers is about 1,5λo/4, the surface acoustic wave device can be produced without a very fine processing technic.

Description: The present invention relates to a surface acoustic wave device which is suited, for example, to a transceiver or a transmitter and a receiver for mobile communications such as cellular radio. A conventional surface acoustic wave filter comprises an input or output interdigital transducer mounted on a piezoelectric substrate for converting an electric signal to a surface acoustic wave or a surface acoustic wave to an electric signal and an intermediate interdigital transducer for connecting inputs when necessary. Such a surface acoustic wave filter is described, for example, in IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. MTT-33, No. 6, pp. 510 - 518, June 1985. In such a device of the prior art, assuming that a wavelength of a surface acoustic wave propagating at a frequency equivalent to the center frequency (frequency at the center of the pass band) of the filter is λo, a width of each of interdigital electrode fingers is about 1/4 of the wavelength or λo/4. The value of λo, is proportional to the reciprocal of the center frequency of the surface acoustic wave filter; that is, the value of λ₀ decreases as the frequency increases. When the frequency is 1 GHz, for example, the value of λ₀ is about 5 µm, and the electrode finger width becomes 1.0 to 1.25 µm. JP-A-63 250 908 (Pat. Abstr. of Japan Vol 13, No. 62 (E-715), 13. Feb. 1989) shows a surface acoustical wave device. Electrode finger widths are not specified for this device. They are apparently different for electrically independent electrode fingers and for electrode fingers connected to common electrodes. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION There has been a request for a high frequency surface acoustic wave filter of 1 GHz or higher in mobile and optical communications. However, the prior art does not consider productivity of such high frequency surface acoustic wave filters. Therefore, the electrode finger width of λ o /4 becomes submicrons at a frequency of 1 GHz or higher, causing problems such that a very fine process technic is required and the productivity is extremely decreased. A transducer of the prior art, as shown in Fig. 3(a), excites or receives a surface acoustic wave by electrode fingers 14 and 15 which are alternately applied with a positive and a negative voltage. As to the relationship between the potential of each electrode finger and the surface acoustic wave, as shown in the sectional view in Fig. 3(b), electrode fingers 15 and 14 of the transducer exist at the peaks and bottoms of the oscillation generated by the surface acoustic wave, and the electrode fingers are applied with a positive or negative voltage or a negative or positive voltage in correspondence with each peak or bottom. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the electrode finger width of a transducer of the prior art is generally about a quarter of the wavelength. The propagation speed of a surface acoustic wave is generally 4,000 to 5,000 m/s though it varies with a piezoelectric substrate. Therefore, the electrode finger width of a transducer is 1.0 to 1.25 µm in a frequency band of about 1 GHz. In recent mobile or optical communications, frequencies of about 1 GHz are often used. In the near future, this frequency band will be fully exhausted and higher frequencies will be required. A surface acoustic wave device is possibly necessary for miniaturization of mobile communications and for high performance of optical communications such as timing extraction. Use of high frequencies requires a very fine processing technic for forming a surface acoustic wave device. A surface acoustic wave device of a frequency band of 2 GHz, for example, requires a fine processing technic of an electrode finger width of 0.5 to 0.6 µm. This is almost a limit of the current processing technic in consideration of productivity. Forming of devices at higher frequencies is possibly very hard at a high yield rate. An object of the present invention is to provide a high frequency surface acoustic wave device and a transducer device using the same which can be produced without a very fine processing technic. The above object is accomplished by the present invention providing a surface acoustic wave device according to claim 1. Dependent claims relate to advantageous embodiments of the invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the accompanying drawings: Fig. 1 is a perspective view of the first embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 2 is a sectional view of electrode fingers of the embodiment shown in Fig. 1 for explaining the layout of the electrode fingers; Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) are a plan view and a sectional view for showing the layout of electrode fingers of a transducer of the prior art; Figs. 4(a), 4(b) and 4(c) are plan views for showing the layout of electrode fingers of the second, third, and fourth embodiments of the present invention; Fig. 5 is a plan view for showing the layout of electrode fingers of the fifth embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 6 is a plan view for showing the layout of electrode fingers of a surface acoustic wave filter of the sixth embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 7 is a graph for showing the frequency characteristics of the filter shown in Fig. 6; and Figs. 8(a), 8(b) and 8(c) are drawings for explaining the propagation status of a surface acoustic wave. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS Fig. 1 shows a surface acoustic wave device of the first embodiment of the present invention. The surface acoustic wave device of the first embodiment comprises an input transducer for converting an electric signal to a surface acoustic wave and an output transducer for converting a surface acoustic wave to an electric signal basically in the same way as a surface acoustic wave device of the prior art. The electrical characteristics of the surface acoustic wave device of the first embodiment are basically the same as those of a surface acoustic wave device of the prior art. Only one difference between the surface acoustic wave device of the first embodiment and a surface acoustic wave device of the prior art is in the electrode configuration of each transducer. In Fig. 1, a reference numeral 1 designates a piezoelectric substrate. Reference numerals 2, 3 and 4 designate electrode fingers mounted on the piezoelectric substrate 1 for forming an input transducer, 6, 7 and 8 electrode fingers mounted on the piezoelectric substrate 1 for forming an output transducer, and 5 and 9 an input terminal and an output terminal of the surface acoustic wave device. A reference numeral 10 designates a surface acoustic wave which propagates from the input transducer to the output transducer. A positive or negative voltage is applied to the electrode fingers 2 and 4 of the input transducer as an input signal. The electrode finger 3 is located between the electrode fingers 2 and 4. The electrode finger 3 is not connected to an external circuit and electrically independent of the external circuit. A positive or negative voltage is delivered out of the electrode fingers 6 and 8 of the output transducer as an output signal. The electrode finger 7 is located between the electrode fingers 6 and 8. The electrode finger 7 is not connected to an external circuit and electrically independent of the external circuit. Fig. 2 shows a sectional view of the input transducer of the surface acoustic wave device shown in Fig. 1. The distance between the centers of the electrode fingers 2 and 4 which are applied with a positive or negative voltage is assumed as L. A frequency of a surface acoustic wave excited by the voltages applied to the electrode fingers 2 and 4 is obtained from the expression indicated below. L = (n + 0.5)λ where a symbol n indicates zero or a positive integer and a symbol λ indicates a wavelength of a surface acoustic wave which can propagate through the piezoelectric substrate. In the case of a surface acoustic wave device, the frequency of a surface acoustic wave can be represented by the center frequency (for example, the frequency at the center of the pass band of the surface acoustic wave filter) of the surface acoustic wave device. Assuming, therefore, a wavelength of the surface acoustic wave propagating through the piezoelectric substrate 1 at a frequency equivalent to the center frequency of the surface acoustic wave device as λo, the above expression can be represented as follows: L = (n + 0.5)λo According to the present invention, a symbol n can be set to 1, 2, or 3. The reason will be described later. Since the electrode finger 3 is located between the electrode fingers 2 and 4 in the present invention, the location pitch of the electrode fingers 2, 3 and 4 is about L/2 = (n + 0.5)λo/2. The width of each of the electrode fingers 2, 3 and 4 in the present invention is about L/4 = (n + 0.5)λo/4. Fig. 2 shows an embodiment in which a symbol n is set to 1. When n = 1, the location pitch of the electrode fingers 2, 3 and 4 is about 1.5λo/2, and the width of each of the electrode fingers 2, 3 and 4 is about 1.5λo/4. The width of each of the electrode fingers of a surface acoustic wave device of the prior art is about λo/4. Since the width of each of the electrode fingers of the embodiment of the present invention shown in Fig. 2 is about 1.5λo/4 and the space between the neighboring electrode fingers is also about 1.5λo/4, the fineness required for the processing technic of electrode fingers is eased by 50%. When n = 0, the width of each of the electrode fingers is about λo/8 and the space between the neighboring electrode fingers is also about λo/8. Therefore, a very fine processing technic is required. It is desirable that the value of n is large from a viewpoint of the processing technic, while n=3 is a practical upper limit from a viewpoint of the excitation efficiency of a surface acoustic wave. According to the present invention, therefore, a positive integer of 3 or smaller is selected as a value of n. According to the present invention, both the width of each electrode finger and the space between the neighboring electrode fingers are equal to each other such as (n + 0.5)λo/4. This means that the fineness of processing of the width of electrode fingers and that of processing of the space between neighboring electrode fingers are the same. This is extremely desirable from a viewpoint of the processing technic. Since the electrode fingers 3 of the embodiment of the present invention shown in Fig. 2 are not connected to the external circuit, the electrode fingers 3 are electrically floating. The potential of this floating electrode finger 3 is almost an intermediate potential of the voltages applied to the electrode fingers 2 and 4 on both sides. The installation of the floating electrode finger 3 between the electrode fingers 2 and 4 applied with voltages is a greatest feature of the present invention. As described later in detail, it is desirable that each two or more of such floating electrode fingers are electrically connected to each other so as to provide the same potential. In the embodiment shown in Fig. 1, the electrode fingers 6, 7 and 8 forming the output transducer are also located on the piezoelectric substrate 1 at the same pitch as that of the electrode fingers 2, 3 and 4 of the input transducer, and the width of each the electrode fingers 6, 7 and 8 is also the same as that of the electrode fingers 2, 3 and 4. The electrode finger 7 between the electrode fingers 6 and 8, which supply output voltages, is also a floating electrode finger the same as the electrode finger 3 of the input transducer. In the same way as the floating electrode fingers of the input transducer, it is desirable that each two or more of such floating electrode fingers of the output transducer are electrically connected to each other so as to provide the same potential. Next, the fact that a transducer of the configuration shown in Fig. 2 can excite a surface acoustic wave in similar way as with the configuration shown in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) will be described hereunder. It is necessary to consider an interval of L first. Although lines of electric force run from an electrode finger which is applied with a positive voltage to an electrode finger which is applied with a negative voltage, very few lines of electric force run directly from a positive electrode finger to a negative electrode finger. The oscillation field distribution of the surface acoustic wave shown in Fig. 2 oscillates by the distance equivalent to about 1.5 times of the wavelength within an interval of L. The above lines of electric force directly running in this section are in a fixed direction predetermined by the relative position of the positive and negative electrode fingers. Therefore, very few lines directly running are coupled to the oscillation field distribution of the surface acoustic wave via the piezoelectric effect of the substrate 1. Since few lines of electric force run directly between the positive and negative electrode fingers and few lines of electric force directly running are coupled to the surface acoustic wave, excitation of the surface acoustic wave by the lines of electric force directly running between the positive and negative electrode fingers can be ignored. Lines of electric force, which run from the positive electrode finger to the intermediate floating electrode finger and then from the floating electrode finger to the negative electrode finger, exist. The above lines of electric force between the positive and floating electrode fingers are, as shown in Fig. 2, synchronized with the period of the oscillation field distribution of the surface acoustic wave in similar way as the lines of electric force running from the positive electrode finger to the negative electrode finger shown in Fig. 3(b). The lines of electric force running from the floating electrode finger to the negative electrode finger are also synchronized with the period of the oscillation field distribution of the surface acoustic wave. Therefore, the lines of electric force, which run from the positive electrode finger to the intermediate floating electrode finger and then from the floating electrode finger to the negative electrode finger, are intensively coupled to the surface acoustic wave via the piezoelectric effect of the substrate. It has been checked that the coupling intensity is almost equal to that when electrode fingers with the width of about a quarter of the wavelength shown in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) are used. The foregoing is the configuration of the first embodiment of the present invention. On the assumption that a wavelength of a surface acoustic wave, which can propagate at a frequency equivalent to the center frequency of a surface acoustic wave device, is λo, by setting the width of electrode fingers, which are applied with positive and negative voltages, to about 1.5λo/4 and installing electrically floating electrode fingers with a width of about 1.5λo/4 between the electrode fingers, which are applied with positive and negative voltages, a surface acoustic wave device, which provides a function almost equal to that of a surface acoustic wave device of the prior art with a configuration of electrode fingers with a width of about λo/4 and eases the processing load required for forming electrode fingers to two thirds of the load required for forming the conventional electrode fingers, can be provided. Next, the second, third, and fourth embodiments of the present invention will be described hereunder as examples of concrete transducers according to the present invention. Figs. 4(a), 4(b) and 4(c) show various configuration examples of transducers according to the present invention. Fig. 4(a) shows a transducer with a configuration which is the same as that of the transducer shown in Fig. 1 or 2. This is a most ideal configuration. It is desirable that the electrically floating electrode fingers 3 are all electrically connected to each other as shown in Fig. 4(a). By doing this, the excitation of the surface acoustic wave described in Fig. 2 will not be affected greatly. The excited surface acoustic wave propagates horizontally, though the surface acoustic wave is converted to a bulk wave or scattered by an effect of the electrically floating finger during propagation, increasing losses. Various experiments show that an increase in loss can be greatly decreased by electrically connecting the electrically floating electrode fingers 3 to each other as shown in Fig. 4(a). Possible causes are as follows. When a surface acoustic wave propagates through a piezoelectric substrate, the concentration of the surface acoustic wave energy onto the substrate varies with the status of the propagation path surface, such that the surface is deposited with a thin metallic film or not. The energy concentration on the substrate surface with a thin metallic film coated on is high. This means that the substrate surface with a thin metallic film coated on prevents the substrate surface from disturbance and minimizes conversion of the surface acoustic wave to a bulk wave. The same may be said with Fig. 4(a). When an electrically floating electrode finger is fully independent of another floating electrode fingers, this floating electrode finger produces little effect on concentrating the energy of a surface acoustic wave during propagation onto the substrate surface. When an electrode finger is on the substrate surface, therefore, the surface is greatly disturbed and the surface acoustic wave is converted to a bulk wave during propagation, resulting in an increase in loss. When the electrically floating electrode fingers are electrically connected to each other as shown in Fig. 4(a), the excitation of the surface acoustic wave, as described above, is not greatly different from that when the floating electrode fingers are not electrically connected to each other, while propagation of the excited surface acoustic wave takes place in a state very close to the state when the propagation path of the surface acoustic wave, i.e., the substrate surface is coated with a thin metallic film. Therefore, the conversion of the surface acoustic wave to a bulk wave, which is caused by the disturbance of the substrate surface where electrode fingers exist, is extremely minimized, resulting in a great decrease in the loss by conversion. This is the reason why the electrically floating electrode fingers are electrically connected to each other as shown in Fig.4(a). However, it is not always advisable in consideration of the yield rate of forming of devices to electrically connect all floating electrode fingers. Various experiments show that partial connections of each several floating electrode fingers as shown in Figs. 4(b) and 4(c) produce the same effect. The experiments show that connections of at least two floating electrode fingers to each other produce almost the same loss characteristics as those in Fig. 4(a). When creating frequency characteristics of a surface acoustic wave device or especially filter, it is necessary to weight transducers. As a weighting example of a transducer comprising electrode fingers with the configuration shown in Fig. 4(a), introduction of "New Phase Weighting" indicated in IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. MTT-33, No. 6, pp.510 - 518, June 1985 will be described hereunder. Fig. 5 shows a transducer comprising electrode fingers with the configuration shown in Fig. 4 (a), which is subject to "New Phase Weighting", as the fifth embodiment of the present invention. It is important that when a transducer is weighted, broad electrodes 2b, which are not directly related to the excitation of a surface acoustic wave, or similar portions are formed as shown in Fig. 5. The transducer has an electrical capacity against the back of the piezoelectric substrate via the substrate. This capacity adversely affects characteristics of especially a high frequency surface acoustic wave device. So as to minimize this effect of the earth capacity, it is desirable to form broad electrodes 2b with a large area on the ground side of the transducer as shown in Fig. 5. By doing this, a device which is not affected by the earth capacity of the broad electrodes 2b or a high frequency device wherein the effect of the earth capacity is minimized can be produced. A transducer with the electrode finger configuration shown in Fig. 4(a) is applicable, as shown in Fig. 6, to image impedance connection transducers 20 and 21 of a low-loss surface acoustic wave filter using image impedance connection transducers which are indicated in the previous literature, and also to input and output transducers 19 and 22. Fig. 6 shows a filter of the sixth embodiment of the present invention. Fig. 7 shows the result when a transducer with the electrode finger configuration shown in Fig. 4(a) is applied to the filter configuration shown in Fig. 6 and the filter is simulated in the 1.5 GHz frequency band by the simulation method indicated in the literature. The simulation result shows that the obtained filter frequency characteristics are almost the same as those obtained when transducers comprising electrode fingers with a width of about a quarter of the wavelength, which are indicated in the literature, are used and that the electrode finger configuration of the present invention is extremely effective. Each arrow shown in Fig. 6 indicates the propagation direction of the surface acoustic wave or the flow direction of the electrical signal. Connections of electrically floating electrode fingers to each other as shown in Fig. 4(a) may greatly affect not only the loss characteristics but also the excitation efficiency of the surface acoustic wave, on the basis that the propagation mode of a surface acoustic wave depends on the cut angle of a piezoelectric substrate to be used. This will be described hereunder. In the case of a lithium niobate (LiNbO₃) piezoelectric substrate, for example, the cut angle of LiNbO₃, which is generally used as a TV intermediate frequency surface acoustic wave filter, is 128° rotated Y-cut X-propagation. This surface acoustic wave is called a Rayleigh surface wave, which is lower in propagation speed than bulk waves which can exist in LiNbO₃, i.e., a longitudinal wave and two transverse waves. When the crystal cut angle of LiNbO₃ is changed, surface acoustic waves in various modes can be propagated depending on the rotational angle like an example, for instance, indicated in Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 856 - 862, March 1972. The literature shows that a leaky surface wave can propagate along the X axis of 41° or 64° rotated Y-cut plane in LiNbO₃. This leaky surface wave is characterized in that the propagation speed is, unlike a Rayleigh surface wave, is higher than that of the slowest bulk wave, i.e., the slow transverse wave in the bulk waves which propagate through LiNbO₃. Such a surface acoustic wave can be efficiently converted from an electrical signal to an elastic oscillation because the electromechanical coupling factor of the wave is extremely high. The temperature characteristics of the leaky surface wave are better than those of the Rayleigh surface wave. Therefore, the lithium niobate (LiNbO₃) piezoelectric substrate attracts a great deal of attention as a piezoelectric substrate suited to recent communication surface acoustic wave devices. As described in the above literature, this leaky surface wave extremely differs in the oscillation field distribution between the piezoelectric substrate surface with a thin metallic film coated and that without a thin metallic film. The leaky surface wave is detailed in Fig. 8 in comparison with the Rayleigh surface wave. Fig. 8(a) shows the propagation status of a Rayleigh surface wave; that is, a surface acoustic wave 27, which is excited by an input transducer 25, propagates on the surface of the substrate, and is received by an output transducer 26. There is no loss caused by propagation in principle on the propagation path from the input transducer to the output transducer. Figs. 8(b) and 8(c) show the propagation statuses of the leaky surface wave. The leaky surface wave, which is excited by the input transducer 25, is propagated to the output transducer 26. When the propagation path between the transducers 25 and 26 is not coated with a thin metallic film, the propagation form of the leaky surface wave is close to that of a bulk wave, causing the most part of the energy to be discharged into the substrate, as shown in Fig. 8(b). When the substrate surface is coated with a thin metallic film 29, the energy discharge into the substrate is minimized and the loss caused by propagation is decreased to almost that of the Rayleigh surface wave, as shown in Fig. 8(c). Therefore, when forming devices using a leaky surface wave, it is required to use substrates with the surface coated with the thin metallic film 29 or substrates in a state similar to the coated state. The above description shows that when a transducer with the electrode finger configuration of the present invention is formed with a substrate through which a leaky surface wave can propagate, electrical connections of the electrically floating electrode fingers shown in Figs. 4(a), 4(b) and 4(c) to each other provide a state equivalent to that when the substrate surface is coated with a thin metallic film. As described above, a surface acoustic wave device of the prior art uses electrode fingers with a width of about a quarter of the wavelength and the processing load is extremely increased as the frequency increases, while the electrode finger width according to the present invention is at least about 1.5/4 times of the wavelength so as to provide the same function and the processing load can be greatly eased. A transducer introducing the present invention can be weighted in the same way as a transducer of the prior art. For example, the filter structure of the prior art can be used unchanged. The description of the embodiments of the present invention uses examples of surface acoustic wave filters. However, there are various surface acoustic wave devices available besides filters, such as a signal processing device and a device using an interaction of the light and a surface acoustic wave. The present invention can obviously be applied to those devices.

Claims: A surface acoustic wave device comprising: a piezoelectric substrate for propagating a surface acoustic wave; a first set of electrode fingers located on said substrate along the propagation direction of said surface acoustic wave; wherein said electrode fingers (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8) of said first set are located on said substrate (1) at a pitch substantially equal to 1.5 λ₀/2 so that every other finger (3, 7) is electrically independent of an external circuit; and wherein the electrode fingers (2, 4, 6, 8) located adjacent to an electrically independent electrode finger (3, 7) are alternately electrically connected to one of two common electrodes, the first of which is grounded, the second connected to an input terminal or an output terminal, characterized in that the width of each electrode finger of said first set is substantially equal to 1.5 λ o /4, wherein a symbol λ₀ indicates the wavelength of a surface acoustic wave with a frequency equivalent to the center frequency of said surface acoustic wave device. A surface acoustic wave device according to claim 1 wherein two or more of said electrode fingers (3, 7) which are electrically independent of said external circiut are connected to each other in order that they have the same potential. A surface acoustic wave device according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that it includes a second set of electrode fingers (2b) which are weighted. A surface acoustic wave device according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that it includes a second set of electrode fingers (2b) connected to the grounded common electrode that are formed as broad electrodes for weighting. A surface acoustic wave device according to one of the claims 1 to 4 wherein said piezoelectric substrate is cut from a piezoelectric crystal at such an angle that a leaky surface wave can propagate through the substrate. A surface acoustic wave transducer device comprising: an input transducer (19) for converting an electrical signal to a surface acoustic wave; a first intermediate transducer (20) for converting a surface acoustic wave to an electrical signal; a second intermediate transducer (21) which is electrically connected to said first intermediate transducer (20) and converts an electrical signal to a surface acoustic wave; and an output transducer (22) for converting a surface acoustic wave to an electrical signal; characterized in that each of said transducers comprises a surface acoustic wave device according to any one of claims 1 to 5.

Inventors: HIKITA MITSUTAKA, ISOBE ATSUSHI, KUROSAWA KAZUHITO, SHIBAGAKI NOBUHIKO, TABUCHI TOYOJI, HIKITA, MITSUTAKA, ISOBE, ATSUSHI, KUROSAWA, KAZUHITO, SHIBAGAKI, NOBUHIKO, TABUCHI, TOYOJI
Applicants: HITACHI LTD, HITACHI, LTD.
Application year: 1990
Main classification: H03H9
IPC codes: H03H9