Ring network switching control device

Abstract: A ring network switching apparatus connects a plurality of communication nodes by a duplex ring type transmission line. Respective communication nodes autonomously vary respective connection state by respective transmission line switching means based on the control data received from the control data receiving unit. Respective communication nodes transmit the control information designating a new transmission line state from the control information transmission unit. Thereby, respective communication nodes autonomously recover its failure and perform a re-construction of a network without an aid of a parent station. Further, the transmission data from the communication node is outputted to both transmission lines through a hybrid output means. Thus, respective communication nodes merely observe the state of the transmission line on the receiving side and switch the receiving switching means based on the observation. Therefore, the connection state of respective communication nodes can autonomously change, thereby providing a re-construction of a network at a high speed and simplifying a control circuit thereof.

Description: Background of the Invention Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a ring network which is applied to a local area network (LAN) and, more particularly, to a ring network switching control device for automatically reconfiguring a network in the event of a transmission-line failure by use of a duplex transmission line. Description of the Related Art Local area networks (LANs), in which a plurality of communication nodes (communication control devices which accommodate terminals and the like) are linked together via a transmission line in the form of a ring, thus allowing data interchange among distributed terminals and computers have been used widely. In general, an advantage of duplex transmission lines is that, even when a fault occurs in one of the transmission lines, another transmission line can be used to continue the data communication and thus a reliable system is obtained. Also, by forming the duplex transmission lines as two loops for transmitting data in reverse directions, even when both of the two lines are cut, or when a fault occurs in a node, the data communication can be maintained at a minimum scale of the system through a loop back. In such a ring network, where a transmission-line failure and a change of state occur in a node, the transmission line is reconfigured. In addition to the above-mentioned duplex line technology, when the system is recovered, it is necessary to reset the loop back or to expand the loop back to the recovered position of the system. Based on the above, the present invention provides a system which enables the formation of a loop back and the resetting of each node (including a supervisory node), to obtain a flexible system operation. As arts related to the present invention, the following publications are known: 1. United State Patent No. 4,542,496 disclosing a conventional loop back control technology; 2. Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No. 57-92,495 disclosing a prior art to the technology disclosed in the above USP 4,542,496; 3. Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No. 59-40,739 disclosing a loop back technology with a supervisory unit; and 4. Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No. 59-57,544 disclosing a loop back control without a supervisory unit. The art disclosed in this document is an alternative to that of the above Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No. 59-40,739. In the above related art shown in Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C, the parent station receives control information representing the state of transmission line 3 from respective communication nodes at regular intervals for centralized control of the entire state of the network. In the event of a failure, the parent station decides its state and transmits control information to each of communication nodes to control its switches (not shown), thereby switching between the #1 and #2 systems of transmission line 3 or performing a loopback of transmission line 3 for reconfiguration of the network. That is, the child stations, operate subordinately as prompted by the parent station. In the above related art, however, a complex control procedure involving several stages or steps is required between the parent station and respective communication nodes in order to modify the configuration of the network system. This will waste a lot of processing time and consequently prolong the interruption of communication. In addition, if a failure should occur in the parent station itself, the entire operation of the network will be stopped. To solve the above problems, USP4930199 (which corresponds to Japanese unexamined Kokai Publication 1-164,141) disclosed a prior art for performing a communication control autonomously by enabling respective communication node to use the control data. The present invention is directed to a further specific and concrete technology for performing an autonomous control. US-A-4 648 088 discloses a distributed control time division multiplex ring communication apparatus comprising a plurality of nodes connected together by interchanged trunks, main and standby paths, in a ring type of closed loop configuration. Each node in the system includes transmitters and receivers on the main and standby paths along with bridging and switching circuits connected to data failure and other failure detection circuits for operating same arranged such that data and alarm signals are transmitted in the first direction on the main path around the closed loop and in an opposite direction on the standby path. The system is arranged such that if a failure occurs only on the main path and the standby path is unaffected, all communications are switched to the standby path. On the other hand, if the failure affects both the standby and the main paths, the circuitry is switched to a configuration where the closed loop comprises portions of the standby and main path and the nodes that are adjacent the failure are connected such that the standby path bypasses those nodes whereby there is direct communication between the two nodes adjacent the failure. However, in this known distributed control time division multiplex ring communication apparatus each node has only one bypass, and therefore there are situations where certain stations cannot be reconfigured. I&CS, Vol. 62, No. 5, May 1989, pages 103 to 106, Radnor, PA, US; R.A. Brown: "Fiber optic LANs: Technology breakthroughs up their potential" provides assessment of trends and directions in the application of this technology for industrial communications. GB-A-2 194 713 discloses a method of restoring a dual transmission line which connects respective stations to make a local area network. JP-A-59 215152 discloses a loop transmission system wherein to attain normal communication at the generation of a failure, an auxiliary transmission line possible for two-way transfer between a loop control station and a node station to change a part of the transmission line to the auxiliary transfer line by means of a modification command is provided. Summary of the Invention It is accordingly an object of the present invention to provide a ring network switching control device which, in the event of a transmission-line failure, permits each communication node to identify the transmission-line failure automatically and a network to be reconfigured automatically and quickly on the basis of simple distributed control, which control device obtains a more flexible system operation. This object is solved according to independent Claims 1 and 8, respectively. Preferred embodiments are listed in the dependent claims. Brief Description of the Drawings Figures 1A, 1B and 1C illustrate a configuration of a ring LAN using a duplexed transmission line; Figure 2A is a first basic block diagram of the present invention; Figure 2B is a second basic block diagram of the present invention; Figure 3 is a block diagram of a first embodiment of the present invention; Figure 4 is a diagram for explaining failure information; Figures 5A through 5E illustrate connecting patterns in the first embodiment; Figures 6A through 6I illustrate inter-station connecting states in the first embodiment; Figures 7A through 7I are conceptual diagrams of the first embodiment; Figure 8 is a block diagram of a second embodiment of the present invention; Figures 9A through 9F illustrate inter-station connecting states in the second embodiment; Figure 10 illustrates a general configuration of a third embodiment of the present invention; and Figure 11 illustrates a general configuration of a fourth embodiment of the present invention. Description of the Preferred Embodiments Figure 1A illustrates a general configuration of a ring network. A supervisory node (hereinafter abbreviated to SN) 1, a parent station, and a plurality of communication nodes (hereinafter abbreviated to INs) 2-1 to 2-5, child stations, are linked in a ring by a transmission line 3 formed of a duplexed optical fiber cable with #1 and #2 systems. Data communication is allowed among INs 2-1 to 2-5 by employing, for example, the #1-system transmission line. The #2-system transmission line is employed as a standby system. Where a failure 4, such as a disconnection, occurs in #1-system transmission line 3 between IN 2-4 and IN 2-5, as illustrated in Figure 1B, transmission line 3 is switched to the standby #2-system transmission line for subsequent operation. Where failures occur in both the #1 and #2 systems of transmission line 3 between IN 2-1 and IN 2-2, as shown in Figure 1C, transmission line 3 is looped back from the #1 system to the #2 system at IN 2-1, and likewise transmission line 3 is looped back from the #2 system to the #1 system so that the network is reconfigured for subsequent operation. The first principle Referring now to Figure 2A, which is a block diagram illustrating a first principle of the present invention, a plurality of communication nodes 6a, 6b, 6c,...are linked in the form of a ring by duplexed transmission lines 7-1 and 7-2. These transmission lines are implemented as a LAN (local area network) formed of, for example, optical fiber cables. Communication node 6a comprises various sections which will be described below. Note that the other communication nodes 6b, 6c and so on have the same configuration. First, control information transmitting sections 9a-1 and 9a-2 are provided. These sections transmit control information 8j-1 and 8j-2 representing the states of transmission lines 7-1 and 7-2 to communication nodes 6b and 6c via transmission lines 7-1 and 7-2, respectively. Secondly, control information receiving sections 10a-1 and 10a-2 are provided. These sections supervise the states of transmission lines 7-1 and 7-2, for example, receive levels, and receive control information 8i-1 and 8i-2 from communication nodes 6b and 6c, respectively. Thirdly, a transmission line switching section 11a is provided. This section switches the connecting state of each of transmission lines 7-1 and 7-2. It switches between transmission lines 7-1 and 7-2 to determine which of them is to be supplied with transmit or receive data within communication node 6a. It also performs such connection switching operations as short-circuiting the input side and output side of each of transmission lines 7-1 and 7-2 so as to allow communication data on the transmission lines to merely pass, or loops the transmission line from 7-1 back to 7-2 or from 7-2 back to 7-1. Finally, a control section 12a is provided. This section prompts transmission line switching section 11a to perform a switching operation and control information transmitting section 9a-1 and 9a-2 to transmit new control information 8j-1 and 8j-2 on the basis of results of the supervision of each of the transmission lines and the reception of control information 8i-1 and 8i-2 by control information receiving sections 10a-1 and 10a-2. The above configuration also applies to the other communication nodes 6b and 6c, in which corresponding sections are designated by like reference characters with subscripts "b" or "c" as shown in Figure 2A. Control information 8k-1 and 8k-2 is transmitted between communication nodes 6b and 6c. In Figure 2A, where a failure occurs somewhere on transmission lines 7-1 or 7-2, the receive level of information transmitted over these transmission lines or the state of reception of control information 8i-1 or 8i-2 in control information receiving sections 10a-1 or 10a-2 will vary in communication node 6a for example. Control section 12a thereby controls the connecting state of the transmission lines in transmission line switching section 11a in accordance with predetermined rules. Also, control section 12a prompts control information transmitting sections 9a-1 and 9a-2 to transmit new control information corresponding to the state in accordance with predetermined rules. The above operation also applies to the other communication nodes 6b and 6c. As described above, the connecting state of each communication node is changed independently, thus permitting automatic reconfiguration of the network without any assistance from the parent station. In this case, the switching rules for the connecting state in transmission line switching section 11a corresponding to changes of state in incoming control information 8i-1 and 8i-2, and the changing rules corresponding to the switching rules for control information 8j-1 and 8j-2 in control information transmitting section 9a-1 and 9a-2 can be determined uniquely in advance. For this reason, control section 12a may store these rules in the form of a table. If it does, when a change of state occurs, control section 12a has only to refer to the table for the transition to a new state. This simple control will permit the above operation to be achieved and the network to be reconfigured quickly. The above rules may be implemented by hard-wired logic, such as sequential circuits, for faster control. The second principle Figure 2B is a second block diagram of the present invention. As in Figure 2A, a plurality of communication nodes 14a, 14b, 14c and so on are sequentially connected in a ring by duplexed transmission lines 15-1 and 15-2, thereby forming a ring network. Communication node 14a comprises various sections which will be described below. The other communication nodes have the same configuration as communication node 14a, as shown. Firstly, a hybrid outputting section 16a is provided. This section outputs transmission data 20a to be communicated to other communication nodes 14b and 14c, to two transmission lines 15-1 and 15-2 in a hybrid manner (simultaneously). That is, in the second principle, transmission data 20a is outputted to both transmission lines 15-1 and 15-2 unconditionally. Secondly, supervisory sections 17a-1 and 17a-2 are provided. These sections supervise an alarm on the receiving sides of transmission lines 15-1 and 15-2. They perform a supervision to determine whether or not data can be received from their corresponding respective transmission line 15-1 or 15-2 within a specified period. If data cannot be received, the section gives an alarm indicating a failure in the transmission line. Thirdly, a reception switching section 18a is provided. This section switches between the transmission lines to receive data 21a. Finally, a control section 19a is provided. This section performs switching control on reception switching section 18a on the basis of the supervised states by supervisory sections 17a-1 and 17a-2. The above e configuration also applies to communication nodes 14b and 14c, in which corresponding sections are designated by like reference characters with subscripts "b" or "c". Though not illustrated, a switching control section may be provided for performing a connection switching operation such as short-circuiting the input and output sides of transmission lines 15-1 and 15-2 to simply allow communication data on the transmission lines to pass, or loops the transmission line from 15-1 back to 15-2 or from 15-2 block to 15-1. If it does, communication node 14a will be allowed to have the function of a transit node as well as the function of a communication node adapted to transmit data 20a and receive data 21a. In the block diagram of the second principle, if a failure occurs somewhere in transmission lines 15-1 and 15-2, supervisory section 17a-1 or 17a-2 in communication node 6a will give an alarm indicating that data cannot be normally received from the transmission line. In response, control section 19a controls reception switching section 18a. That is, with data 21a received from transmission line 15-1 through supervisory section 17a-1 and reception switching section 18a, if supervisory section 17a-1 gives an alarm indicating that data cannot be normally received, control section 19a switches reception switching section 18a. Thereafter, data 21a is received from transmission line 15-2 through supervisory section 17a-2 and reception switching section 18a. The above operation also applies to other communication nodes 6b and 6c. In the above operation, since transmission data 20a is always outputted onto both transmission lines 15-1 and 15-2 through hybrid outputting means 16a, there is no need to switch the transmission side. In the configuration of Figure 2, therefore, there is no need to transmit control information among the communication nodes. Each communication node has only to supervise the state of the transmission line on the receiving side and correspondingly switch reception switching section 18a in order to independently change its respective connecting state and quickly reconfigure the network. A first preferred embodiment Figure 3 illustrates a configuration of a first preferred embodiment of the present invention. It illustrates the configuration of each of the communication nodes IN 2-1 to IN 2-5 in a general ring type of LAN as shown in Figures 1A to 1C. Since the present embodiment is not directed to a system in which the network is reconfigured under centralized control of supervisory node SN 1, the configuration of SN 1 will not be referred to in particular. In Figure 3, transmission line 3 (refer to Figures 1A to 1C) has a #1-system transmission line for transmission, a #2-system transmission line for reception, a #1-system transmission line for reception and a #2-system transmission line for light-wavelength division multiplexed in one optical fiber cable, the #1 system being multiplexed using a wavelength of λ 2. Of course, the #1 and #2 systems may be formed of separate optical fiber cables. Multiplexing section (hereinafter referred to as WDM) 27-1 multiplexes a #1-system transmission output from #1-system electricity-to-light conversion section λ 1OS of optical conversion section (hereinafter referred to as OPT) 26-1 on transmission line 3 and demultiplexes a #2-system receive input form transmission line 3 for application to #2-system light-to-electricity conversion section λ 2OR of OPT 26-1. WDM 27-2 also performs this operation on a #1-system receive input and a #2-system transmit output among #1-system light-to-electricity conversion circuit λ 1OR, #2-system electricity-to-light conversion circuit λ 2OS and transmission line 3. λ 1OS or λ 2OS in OPT 26-1 or 26-2 converts an electric output signal from a ring switch (hereinafter referred to as RSW) 25 to a light signal having a wavelength of λ 1 or λ 2 for application to WDM 27-1 or 27-2. λ 1OR or λ 2OR in OPT 26-1 or 26-2 converts a light input signal having a wavelength of λ 1 or λ 2 from WDM 27-1 or 27-2 to an electric signal for application to RSW 25. RSW 25 selectively connects the input and output of multiplexing/demultiplexing section (hereinafter referred to as MUX/DMUX) 24 to either OPT 26-1 or OPT 26-2. In other words, RSW 25 determines which of the #1 system or #2 system transmission lines is to be connected to MUX/DMUX 24. Also, RSW 25 may connect λ 1OR and λ 1OS or λ 2OR and λ 2OS directly. MUX/DMUX 24 multiplexes or demultiplexes a time-division multiplexed signal having a transmission rate of 32 Mbps which is transmitted between time switch (hereinafter referred to as TSW) 23 and RSW 25. TSW 23 determines which of 480 channels of the time-division multiplexed signal of 32 Mbps in transmission rate is to be allotted to an input/output signal having a transmission rate of 64 kbps in interface (hereinafter referred to as IF) 22. For other channels which are not allotted to the signal, TSW 23 directly connects its receive input from MUX/DMUX 24 to its transmit output to MUX/DMUX 24. IF 22 is an interface circuit adapted to make a a connection between a transmission signal S from or a receive signal R to a terminal not shown and TSW 23. Control section 28 performs the entire control of IF 22, TSW 23, MUX/DMUX 24, RSW 25 and OPTs 26-1 and 26-2. The operation of the first embodiment is described below. First, six pieces of failure information, as shown in Figure 4, are employed in the communication node configured as shown in Figure 3. Control section 28 supervises whether or not receive signals, which are light signals, are normally received by λ 1OR and λ 2OR in OPT 26-1. Suppose the state in which a reduction in the receive level of the light signal is detected in λ 1OR to be RX1 and the state in which a reduction in the receive level of the light signal is detected in λ 2OR to RX2. On detection of RX1, namely, a reduction in the receive level of the #1 system receiving side, control section 28 first outputs via λ 2OS return information SEND2 of RX1 to the #2 system transmission side. This output is in the direction of the input signal whose receive level is detected. At the same time, control section 28 outputs failure information NG1 of the #1 system transmission line ( λ 1 loop) to the #1 system transmission side corresponding to RX1. Likewise, on detection of RX2, namely, a reduction in the receive level of the #2 system receiving side, control section 28 first outputs via λ 1OS return information SEND1 of RX2 to the #1 system transmission side. This output is in the direction of the input signal whose receive level is detected. At the same time, control section 28 outputs failure information NG2 of the #2 system transmission line (λ 2 loop) to the #2 system transmission side corresponding to RX2. In a communication node which has not yet detected RX1 or RX2, when control section 28 receives failure information NG1 from the next node via λ 1OR on the #1 system receiving side, it outputs via λ 1OS the failure information NG1 as it is to the #2 system transmitting side. This output is in the direction of the input signal. In the above operation, the six types of failure information of Figure 4 will have a fixed pattern depending on the failure conditions in transmission line 3. How to set the connection state of RSW of Figure 3 for each of the failure conditions may be determined in advance. In the present embodiment, this property is used by control section 28 in each communication node to control the connecting state of RSW 25 on the basis of six types of failure information of Figure 4 and in accordance with the following conditions. First, in the normal operating condition, the connecting state of each communication node is shown at the top of Figure 5A. In this figure, the circuit designated by MUX corresponds to MUX/DMUX 24 of Figure 3. SW0S, SW2S, SW0R, SW1R and SW2R conceptually represent the connecting states of transmission and receive signals in RSW 25. As shown, in the normal condition, an input received from the #1 system transmission line is entered into MUX/DMUX24 via λ 1OR, SW1R and SW0R, while a transmission output of MUX/DMUX 24 is output to the #1 system transmission line via SW0S, SW1S and λ 1OS. That is, the #1 system is employed. At this point, λ 2OR and λ 2OS are short-circuited by SW2R and SW2S. If a failure occurs in these operating conditions when the #1 system is employed, the connecting patterns in RSW 25 and the output patterns of failure information from λ 1OS or λ 2OS will have 17 types of patterns represented by condition 1 through condition 17, as illustrated in Figures 5A through 5E. Theoretically, 2⁶ conditions can occur as a result of combinations of six types of failure information, as shown in Figure 4. However, seventeen following conditions actually occur. For example, condition 1 of Figure 5A corresponds to the case where the state RX1, which represents a reduction in the receive level of the #1 system receiving side, is detected. In this case, the connecting states are changed as shown and, at the same time, failure information NG1 is output from λ 1OS to the #1 system transmitting side and return information SEND2 is output from λ2OS to the #s system transmission side. This also applies to conditions 2 through 17. At the bottom of Figure 5E is illustrated a case where a failure occurs in a communication node when the #1 system is employed. In this case, in order to remove the failing communication node from the network, SW1R and SW1S are switched as shown so that λ1OR and λ1OS are short-circuited. Examples of actual employment of the network based on the above connecting conditions are represented by cases 1 through 9 in Figures 6A through 6I. The corresponding states of the whole network are illustrated in Figures 7A through 7I. These examples are illustrated as comprising four communication nodes A to D. The number of communication nodes is not limited to four but may be arbitrarily increased. First, case 1 of Figures 6A and 7A represents a case where, when the #1 system transmission line is employed, a failure occurs in #1 system between B station and C station. In this case, the receive level reduced state RX1 at λ 1OR is detected in B station as shown in Figure 6A so that it enters the connecting state in condition 1 of Figure 5A. As a result, failure information NG1 is sent from B station to A station over the #1 system transmission line and return information SEND2 is returned from B station to C station over the #2 system transmission line. Furthermore, failure information NG1 is transferred from station to station, i.e., from A station to D station and from D station to C station. As a result, A station placed in the connecting state of condition 13 of Figure 5D and station C is placed in the connecting state of condition 14 of Figure 5D. By such an independent operation in each communication node, the transmission line is switched from #1 system to #2 system for employment of the network, as indicated by the bold lines in Figure 6A or Figure 7A. Case 2 of Figures 6B and 7B corresponds to a case where failures occur in both the #1 and #2 systems between B station and C station at the time of network employment by use of the #1 system transmission line. In this case, as shown in Figure 6B, the receive level reduced state RX1 at λ1OR is detected in B station and the receive level reduced state RX2 at λ2OR is detected in C station. As a result, A station and D station operate in an interlocking manner so that they enter the connecting state of condition 15 of Figure 5D. B station enters the connecting state of condition 2 of Figure 5A and C station enters the connecting state of condition 7 of Figure 5B. By such independent operation in each communication node, the transmission line is looped from the #1 system back to the #2 system in C station and from the #2 system back to the #1 system in B station as indicated by the bold lines in Figure 6B or Figure 7B. Thus, an alternative route is established as shown in Figure 7B to circumvent the failed portions. Other cases 3 through 9 of Figures 6C through 6I or Figures 7C through 7I may be similarly considered. The Second Preferred Embodiment Figure 8 shows a configuration of the second preferred embodiment of the present invention. This embodiment, which is similar to the first preferred embodiment, shows the configuration of one of the communication nodes IN2-1 to IN2-5 in a general ring type LAN shown in Figures 1A to 1C. In Figure 8, OS#1, OS#2, OR#1 and OR#2 are respectively the same as λ1OS, λ2OS, λ10R and λ20R in the first preferred embodiment shown in Figure 3. Accordingly, transmission line 3 (which should be referred to in Figures 1A to 1C) comprises an optical fiber cable in which the transmission side of the #1 system and the receiving side of the #2 system, the receiving side of the #1 system and the transmission side of the #2 system are optical-wavelength multiplexed. Needless to say, the #1 and #2 systems may be formed of separate optical fiber cables. The circuit corresponding to WDM 27-1 and 27-2 of the first preferred embodiment may be omitted. The second preferred embodiment does not have a circuit corresponding to RSW 25 of the first preferred embodiment shown in Figure 3 and the input side of OS#1 and OS#2 and the output side of OR#1 and OR#2 are connected to MUX-DMUX 32-1 and 32-2. MUX/DMUX 32-1 and 32-2 perform multiplexes or demultiplexes by using time divisional multiplexed signals having transmission speeds of 32 Mbps, forming an input and output at passing portion 31 and an input and output at OS#1, OS#2, OR#1 and OR#2 in the same manner as MUX/DMUX 24 in the first preferred embodiment shown in Figure 3. Passing portion 31 determines to which of 480 channels of a time divisional multiplexing signal having a transmission speed of 32 Mbps in MUX/DMUX 32-1 or 32-2 the input and output signal at branch switching portion 30 is assigned. In the unassigned channels, the receiving side input from MUX/DMUX 32-1 is relayed to the output of the transmission side to MUX/DMUX 32-2. Conversely, the input of the receiving side from MUX/DMUX 32-2 is relayed to the output of the transmission side to MUX/DMUX 32-1. In this embodiment, the unit in which the above assignment is performed is not limited to a single channel unit but comprises an HG unit, as described later. Branch switching unit 30 is the most characteristic portion of the present embodiment and comprises a hybrid output portion H and a receive switching portion SW. Hybrid output portion H comprises a circuit for outputting the transmission output from IF 29 to two systems. Thus, the transmission output is transmitted to MUX/DMUX 32-1 and the transmission line of the #1 system through OS#1. The transmission output is also transmitted from a passing portion 31 to MUX/DMUX 32-2 and the transmission line of #2 system through OS#2. Receive switching portion SW selects one of the receiving input from the #1 system receiving side through MUX/DMUX 32-2 and passing portion 31 and the receiving input from the #2 system receiving side through MUX/DMUX 32-1 and passing portion 31 and outputs the selected input to IF 29. IF 29 is an interface circuit for performing a connection between a transmission signal S or a receive signal R for a terminal not shown and branch switching portion 30 in the same manner as IF in the first preferred embodiment shown in Figure 3. Control unit 33 performs a whole control of IF 29, branch switching portion 30, passing portion 31, MUX/DMUX 32-1, 32-2, OS#1, OS#2, OR#1 and OR#2 of the above structure. The operation of the second preferred embodiment with the above structure will be explained hereinafter. The respective communication shown in Figure 8 in the present embodiment autonomously performs a switching of a transmission line 3 between #1 system and #2 system, thereby reconstructing the network. The connection logic is simple. Control unit 33 performs a supervision to determine whether or not the receiving signal of an optical signal is normally received. Where an alarm of a receive input is detected in OR#1, control unit 33 enables a switching of receive switching unit SW in branch switching unit 30 to select a receive input from MNUX/DMUX 32-1. Conversely, where a receive input alarm is detected at OR#2, receive switching portion SW in branch switching unit 30 is switched to select a receive input from MUX/DMUX 32-2. The signal transmitted on transmission line 3 is a time divisional multiplexing signal of 480 channels having a transmission speed of 32Mbps. Six of these 480 channels form a unit of HG. The embodiment has a receiving alarm in an HG unit and performs a switching in an HG unit. Connection of passing portion 31 with IF 29 side is also performed in an HG unit and, for example, HG1 may be connected to IF 29 and HG2-HG80 merely relay by MUX/DMUX 32-1 and 32-2. An autonomous control is completed at respective communication nodes by the above simple switching logic only. Namely, the first preferred embodiment controls a switching of both transmission and receive sides in RSW 25 in accordance with failure information. However, the second preferred embodiment uses only an alarm on the receiving side for failure information and thus switches the receiving side to either #1 system or #2 system. Examples of actual network operation are shown by cases 1 to 6 in Figures 9A to 9F. As in the first preferred embodiment, Figures 9A to 9F show cases of four communication nodes comprising A station to D station. However, the number of communication nodes is not limited to four and may be discretional. Figure 9A designates a case 1 in which a normal operation is performed and in which a data communication is mutually performed between B station and D station. The present embodiment performs a communication using both transmission lines where #1 system and #2 system are in a normal state. In Figure 9A a portion designated by "H" corresponds to a hybrid outputting section H in Figure 8 and SW, OR correspond to a receiving switching unit SW. SW1S, SW2S, SW1R and SW2R, respectively, conceptionally show a state of connection of a transmit and receive signal in passing portion 31. As shown by the bold line in Figure 9A, in a normal state, the communication data from B station is output from hybrid outputting portion H to a transmission line of #1 system through SW1S and is input to A station. A station relays the communication data through SW1R and SW1S to D station. D station receives the communication data input through a transmission line of #1 system from A station via SW1R to SW0R. Conversely, the communication data from D station is output from hybrid output portion H to a transmission line of #2 system through SW2S and input to A station. A station merely relays the communication data through SW2R and SW2S and inputs the communication data into B station. B station receives the communication data input through a transmission line of #2 system from D station via SW2R to SW0R. Next, a case where a failure occurs is explained. Case 2 shown in Figure 9B shows a case in which a failure occurs between A station and D station of #1 system in the normal state of the case 1. In this case, as shown in Figure 9B, an alarm received at OR#1 (Figure 8) is detected at D station and SW0R (receiving switching SW in Figure 8) is therefore switched from #1 system to #2 system. Accordingly, the communication data from D station to B station is transmitted as shown by the bold line in Figure 9B, using the transmission line of #2 system in the same manner as in Figure 9A. Conversely, the communication data from B station to D station is output from hybrid output portion H of B station to the transmission line of #2 system through SW2S as shown by the bold line and is input to C station. The communication data is relayed through SW2R and SWSR of C station and input to D station. Therefore, the communication data from B station is received by D station through the transmission line of #2 system and through SW2R and SW0R and is received by D station. In this case, D station automatically outputs the communication data from hybrid outputting portion H to the transmission lines comprising #1 system and #2 system and it is not necessary to switch from #1 system to #2 system on the transmission side. Therefore, a failure on the transmission line in #1 system between A station and D station is avoided. The case 3 shown in Figure 9C designates the case where a failure occurs between A station and D station in #2 system in the case 1 designating the normal state. In this case, the receive alarm is detected in B station and SW0R is switched from #2 system to #1 system, thereby enabling the communication data from D station to B station to be transmitted along the transmission line designated by a bold line in Figure 9C. On the other hand, in case 4, shown in Figure 9D, a failure occurs on a transmission line of both #1 system and #2 system between A station and D station in the normal state of case 1. In this case, as shown in Figure 9D, a receive alarm is detected at OR#1 (Figure 8) in both B and D stations. As a result, SW0R of both stations (receive switching unit SW in Figure 8) is switched from #1 system to #2 system. Therefore, both the communication data from B station to D station and the communication data from D station to B station are both switched from #1 system to #2 system as shown by the bold line in Figure 9D. Therefore, the transmission line failure in both #1 system and #2 system between A station and D station is avoided. Case 5 shown in Figure 9E designates the case where a failure occurs on both transmission lines for #1 system and #2 system between A station and B station in the case 1 designating the normal state. In this case, the receive alarm is detected in B station and D station and thus both SWORs are switched from #1 system to #2 system. Accordingly, both communication data from B station to D station and communication data from D to station to B station are switched to a path designated by a bold line shown in Figure 9E. Further, the case 5 shown in Figure 9F designates the case where a failure occurs in both #1 system and #2 system between B station and C station in the case 1 designating the normal state. In this case, both communication data from B station to D station and communication data from D station to B station need not switch the data communication lines. Other Preferred Embodiments Figure 10 shows a view of the whole structure of the third preferred embodiment formed as an application of the first and second preferred embodiments. As shown in Figure 10, a microwave circuit line 33 through transmitter and receiver 39 and a public circuit line 36 through DSU 40 may be provided in a network within communication node 34 in addition to a normal transmission line 35. In this case, an interface operation with an external apparatus is performed by an interface apparatus (multiplying apparatus) 38. Figure 11 shows a view of the whole structure of the fourth embodiment formed as an application of the second preferred embodiment. As shown in Figure 11, a detour transmission line 41 is provided between predetermined stations, for example, between A station and C station, in addition to a normal ring-type transmission line of #1 system and #2 system. Branch switching portion 42-1 is provided at A station and branch switching portion 42-2 is similarly provided at C station and there connected by multiplexing portions 43-1 and 43-2. In A station, the transmission data on the transmission side are output to detour transmission line 41 through hybrid outputting portion H in branch switching portion 42-1 and are transmitted to both the normal transmission lines of #1 system and #2 system through hybrid outputting portion H in A station. The same applies to C station side. As shown in Figure 11, where a transmission line failure occurs between A station and D station, between B station and C station and in both #1 system and #2 system, the receive alarm is detected in A and C stations by both OR#1 and OR#2 (which should be referred to in Figure 8 and is provided in SWORs in A and C stations), and control portion 33 (which should be referred to in Figure 8) within A station and C station controls to switch respective SW0R in receive switching portion SW (which should be referred to Figure 8) in branch switching portions 42-1 and 42-2 in Figure 11. Therefore, the failure between A station and C station can be avoided, enabling the detour connection to be performed.

Claims: A ring network switching control device suitable for being used with a ring network in which each of a plurality of communication nodes (6a; 6b; 6c) is connected in a ring via a duplexed transmission line (7-1; 7-2), each communication node comprising: a control information transmitting means (9a-1, 9a-2; 9b-1, 9b-2; 9c-1, 9c-2) for transmitting control information representing the state of its associated transmission line to another communication node via its associated transmission line; a control information receiving means (10a-1, 10a-2; 10b-1, 10b-2; 10c-1, 10c-2) for supervising the state of its associated transmission line and receiving control information from another communication node via its associated transmission line; a transmission line switching means (11a; 11b; 11c) for switching the connection state of its associated transmission line; and a control means (12a; 12b; 12c) for prompting the transmission line switching means (11a, 11b; 11c) to perform switching control and the control information transmitting means to transmit new control information in accordance with the results of the supervision of the state of the transmission line and the reception of the control information by the control information receiving means, whereby each of said communication nodes (6a; 6b; 6c) performs a distributed control in accordance with a change of state of the network; wherein said transmission line switching means (11a; 11b; 11c) is adapted to perform a switching to determine the transmission line for which an input operation of a receiving data is performed or for which an output operation of transmission data is performed, a switching to merely pass communication data along a transmission line by short-circuiting an input side and output side for both transmission lines or either of the transmission lines, or a switching to loop back one transmission line to the other transmission line. The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said control means (12a; 12b; 12c) has a table for determining a switching rule for said transmission line switching mans (11a; 11b; 11c) and a transmission instruction rule for new control information for said control information transmission means (9a-1, 9a-2; 9b-1, 9b-2; 9c-1, 9c-2) and performs said switching control and transmission instruction control of said new control information by referring to the table based on the state of supervision respective transmission lines and the received result of said control information in accordance with said control information receiving means (10a-1, 10a-2; 10b-1, 10b-2; 10c-1, 10c-2). The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said control means (12a; 12b; 12c) comprises a sequential circuit for performing a switching control for said transmission line switching means and for performing a transmission instruction control of new control information of said control information transmission means (9a-1, 9a-2; 9b-1, 9b-2; 9c-1, 9c-2), based on supervising state of said respective transmission lines by said control information receiving means (10a-1, 10a-2; 10b-1, 10b-2; 10c-1, 10c-2) and the received result of said control information. The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said respective transmission lines (7-1; 7-2) are formed of an optical fiber cable. The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the information transmitted on respective transmission lines (7-1; 7-2) is optically multiplexed. The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the ring network comprises a local area network. The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said respective transmission lines (7-1; 7-2) include either or both of a microwave circuit line (37) or a public circuit line (36). A ring network switching control device suitable for being used with a ring network in which each of a plurality of communication nodes (14a; 14b; 14c) is connected in a ring via a duplexed transmission line (15-1; 15-2), each communication node comprising: a hybrid output means (16a; 16b; 16c) for outputting transmission data to two transmission lines in a hybrid manner; a supervising means (17a-1, 17a-2; 17b-1, 17b-2; 17c-1, 17c-2) for supervising an alarm on a receiving side of each transmission line; reception switching means (18a; 18b; 18c) for switching a transmission line to enable it to receive data; a control means (19a; 19b; 19c) for performing switching control on the reception switching means (18a; 18b; 18c) on the basis of the supervised state by the supervising means (17a-1, 17a-2; 17b-1, 17b-2; 17c-1, 17c-2); and a switching control means for selecting a switching mode in which an input side and an output side is short-circuited for both or either of respective transmission lines to merely pass the transmission data through the transmission line or a switching mode for looping back one of the transmission lines to the other transmission line. The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 8, wherein said supervising means (17a-1, 17a-2; 17b-1, 17b-2; 17c-1, 17c-2) determines whether or not the node can receive the data from the transmission line of the duplex ring-type within the predetermined time period and produces an alarm to notify a failure of a transmission line when it does not receive the data within the predetermined time. The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 8, wherein said respective transmission lines (15-1; 15-2) are formed of an optical fiber cable. The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the information transmitted on respective transmission lines (15-1; 15-2) are optically multiplexed. The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 8, wherein said ring network comprises a local area network. The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 8, wherein said respective transmission lines (15-1; 15-2) include either or both of microwave circuit line (37) and public circuit line (36). The ring network switching control apparatus according to claim 8 further comprising: a detour transmission line (41) between a desired communication node out of a plurality of communication nodes in addition to a duplexed-ring-type transmission line, wherein said control means (19a; 19b; 19c) transmits communication data by switching a transmission line to said detour transmission line (41) and a failure is judged as occurring in any transmission line of the duplexed ring-type, based on the supervising state of said supervising means (17a-1, 17a-2; 17b-1, 17b-2; 17c-1, 17c-2).

Inventors: FUKUDA NOBUO, MATSUSHITA AKIHIRO, SAKAI SHIGEO, TAKEMURA SHINYA, WATANABE TOSHIO, FUKUDA, NOBUO, MATSUSHITA, AKIHIRO, SAKAI, SHIGEO, TAKEMURA, SHINYA, WATANABE, TOSHIO
Applicants: FUJITSU LTD, FUJITSU LIMITED
Application year: 1990
Main classification: H04L12
IPC codes: H04L12