IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO ROAD BARRIERS

Abstract: An impact attenuating barrier wall (68), in particular a concrete barrier wall terminal, has a structural concrete base (70) with a top channel portion adapted to receive a linear array of low strength reinforced concrete modules (72, 84), each composed of three crushable layers: a bottom layer (74) of semi-crushable, higher strength concrete adapted to secure reinforcements and S-beam connectors, to the base, an intermediate layer (76) of lower strength material and a top layer (78) of intermediate strength material. The last module (84), proximate the obstacle, has steel reinforcement in a triangular ramp configuration to cause the impacting vehicle to rise up to avoid the obstacle, if said vehicle has crushed all the preceding modules (72). For the structural concrete base (70) to coact with the undercarriage of the vehicle to cause friction and drag to contribute to bring the vehicle to rest, the height of the non-­ crushable base increases, in direction of the traffic flow, in step-wise (92) or sloping fashion.

Description: The present invention relates generally to roadside or roadway barriers used to prevent vehicles from crossing from the lane of traffic that they are traveling in to an opposite or adjacent lane, carrying vehicles traveling in an opposite direction. The present invention also relates to barrier modules which prevent vehicles from entering into any hazardous area on the roadway. In this manner, roadway barriers prevent head-on collisions on the highways and collisions with other hazardous objects. The present invention also relates to roadside barriers which prevent vehicles from leaving the highway and colliding with fixed roadside obstacles. Specifically, the present invention relates to an improvement in the end treatment of a concrete barrier wall. The apparatus according to the present invention is specifically designed to reduce the chances of serious injury to the occupants of a vehicle which impacts an end of a concrete barrier wall. The primary function of a concrete barrier wall is to redirect errant vehicles back into the flow of traffic without allowing the vehicle to leave the roadway or cross into oncoming lanes of traffic. Further, the barrier should redirect the errant vehicle without seriously injuring the occupants of the vehicle. Secondarily, the barrier should also protect against collisions with roadside obstructions, which may be power poles or bridge abutments. Protection of the obstruction may also be important, for a power pole downed by an errant vehicle may mean a loss of electrical power for large numbers of people. Similarly, a damaged bridge abutment is very costly to repair and may mean closed thoroughfares until the damage has been repaired. Most importantly, however, concrete barriers prevent loss of life caused by "head-on" collisions between vehicles. And, although known prior art barriers have accomplished these objectives, they have all been marked by a common, serious disadvantage. The blunt end of the concrete barrier, facing the oncoming traffic, has proven to be very hazardous. Typically, the end of a concrete barrier wall has been either a blunt, fist shaped end; a blunt end protected by a disposable, "single-event" cushion; or an end protected by a sloping concrete or metal guardrail end-treatment. All of these known barrier wall end-treatments have proven to be unsatisfactory, either for economic or functional reasons. The known blunt end-treatments for concrete barrier walls have proven to be unsatisfactory because a vehicle impacting the blunt end "head-on", is stopped so abruptly that the occupants of the vehicle are most often severely injured or even killed. In a similar manner, many disposable "single-event" cushions used to protect these blunt barrier wall ends have proven to be ineffectual for the same reason. Further, other known "single-event" cushions have proven to be unsatisfactory because they are only partially effective when a vehicle impacts the end of a barrier wall at a high rate of speed. The few known "single-event" cushions that do perform well are extremely costly. Finally, concrete or metal guardrail end-treatments, which provide a top surface which slopes gently from the ground up to the top of the concrete barrier wall, often cause severe injury to the occupants of a vehicle which, when encountering these sloping end treatments, ramps up onto the end treatment and is guided directly to the top of the concrete barrier wall where the concrete barrier wall acts as a rail which will often either: a) cause the vehicle to roll, thereby causing injury to the occupants of the vehicle; or b) guide the errant vehicle directly into a roadside obstacle, thereby severely injuring the occupants of the vehicle when the vehicle impacts the obstacle. The known concrete barrier wall end-treatments of the prior art, therefore, have all been distinguished by a fundamental drawback: they are unable to deaccelerate a vehicle impacting the end of a concrete barrier wall in such a manner so as to avoid serious injury to the occupants, or they do so at a cost that is unreasonable from a societal investment standpoint. The present invention deals with the previously marginally solved problem of prior art concrete barrier wall end-treatments, by providing an advanced dynamic impact extension module which, when placed before the end of a concrete barrier wall, protects the occupants of a vehicle by progressively absorbing the force of impact of the vehicle before the vehicle reaches the end of the concrete barrier wall. A roadside barrier according to the present invention is also able to be quickly and inexpensively installed at the end of a concrete barrier wall, and may be manufactured at a site remote from the concrete barrier wall to which it is attached. According to the present invention a roadside barrier for use in preventing vehicles from impacting an obstacle comprises a structural concrete base section adaptable at its upper surface to receive rectangularly shaped crushable modules, wherein the base section defines a channel along the upper surface of the base and wherein the rectangular modules are received within the channel and are arranged end-to-end; a first type of module comprising a composite module comprising three layers of crushable material of varying strengths, wherein the lowest layer comprises a high strength material, the intermediate layer immediately above the lowest layer comprises a low strength material, and the uppermost layer comprises material having a strength above the low strength material and below the high strength material; a second type of module comprising a composite module comprising three layers of crushable material of varying strengths substantially the same as the first module type, the second module type being positionable at the end of a linear array of modules of the first type at the end of the structural concrete base immediately adjacent to the roadside obstacle; a structural reinforcement within said second module type with the ability to impart upward movement to an impacting vehicle; and means for fixedly attaching the modules of the first type, and means for fixedly attaching the modules of the second type, to the base. The length of the concrete base and the number of modules sitting thereon may be predetermined based on the anticipated number and velocity of vehicles traveling in the immediate vicinity where the barrier wall is desired to be placed. Where vehicles are anticipated to be traveling at a higher velocity, a correspondingly longer length of the barrier wall may be used to absorb the higher force of an impacting vehicle. Conversely, where it is anticipated that the vehicle will be traveling at slower rates of speed, the barrier wall can be shorter because less impact resistance is needed to bring the impacting vehicle to a stop. The modules which are provided to sit atop the concrete base can be of any length. However, it is contemplated in a preferred form of this embodiment that the modules are of a length substantially shorter than the length of the concrete base and may be on the order of 0.9 m (three feet) in length. The number of modules provided may be determined by the length of the concrete base which length is itself determined based on the anticipated need and according to the anticipated velocity of the impacting vehicles. The width of the concrete base at its front end is substantially the same as the width of the crushable modules which are adapted to sit on top of the base. Beginning immediately at the front end of the base, the base may begin an outward taper over a predetermined distance. This taper would provide a sufficient width of the concrete base on either side of the crushable modules which can be stepped up at intervals so as to define a channel in the concrete base and walls to provide reinforcement against the modules moving laterally with respect to the concrete base. Alternatively, the concrete base could be of a constant width throughout its entire length. In an alternative embodiment, the increase in height of the sides of the concrete base which form walls to the concrete base and define a channel portion therein may be provided by a gradual slope beginning at the front end of the base and increasing toward the back end. Holes, such as dowel holes, may be provided at intervals in the wall sections of the concrete base to receive dowels to secure the entire barrier wall to a roadway surface. The back end of the concrete base may be attached to a roadside barrier which the barrier wall protects. According to a preferred form of this embodiment of the present invention, the structural concrete base may be approximately 6.3 m (21 feet) in length. Beginning at the front end, the base may have an outwardly tapering cross-section for the first 2.7 m (nine feet). The width of the base may be about 0.3 m (one foot) at the front end and then may gradually and uniformly increase to a width of 0.6 m (two feet) at a distance of 0.9 m (nine feet) from the front end. The width over the next 3 m (ten feet) of the base may remain constant. The final 0.6 m (two feet) of the base which is adjacent the concrete barrier wall may be modified for connection to a line of portable concrete barrier segments (PCB's). Holes may be provided at strategic locations in the walls along the entire length of the concrete base through which anchoring dowels may be inserted to secure the base to a roadway surface. Reinforcing steel may be provided in the concrete base. The channel of the structural concrete base may run the entire length of the base and may be symmetrical to the center axis of the base. This channel may be of sufficient width to receive the crushable modules of low strength material which may be slipped into place in the channel. In a preferred form of this embodiment, the modules are approximately 27 cm (11 inches) in width. The elevation of the structural concrete base may proceed in a step-wise fashion stepping upward at defined intervals, or increases in a gradual slope, beginning from the front end of the structural concrete base towards the back end. As the vehicle moves downward along the length of the concrete base, progressively crushing the modules in its path according to its impact velocity, the undercarriage of the vehicle may also encounter the stepped or sloped increased height of the walls of the concrete base. In this manner, as the vehicle passes through these intermediate sections and is slowed by the force required to crush the lower density crushable material provided in the module sections, the velocity of the vehicle may be further reduced by the friction and drag produced on the bottom of the vehicle by the increased heights of the walls of the non-crushable concrete base. In further accordance with this embodiment, side runners may be attached to the exterior walls of the concrete base at the point where the wall height is at its maximum. These side runners are capable of producing redirection of vehicles that collide with the concrete base at an angle along the side. It is also contemplated that the side runners be molded or formed as an integral part of the walls which would also perform the same function of redirecting errant vehicles. The modules of this embodiment are preferably designed as rectangular sections and are preferably of a width smaller than the width of the channel portion and thus capable of being inserted within the channel portion of the concrete base. The height and length of the modules are variable. In a preferred form this embodiment the modules have dimensions of about 0.27 m (11 inches) in width, about 0.9 m (three feet) in length and about 0.6 m (two feet) in height. The 0.27 m (11 inch) width makes for easy insertion into the 0.3 m (one foot) wide channel portion of the concrete base. In a preferred form of this embodiment, the bottom or lower 10%-15% of the module is composed of about 7.0x10⁵ kg/m² (1000 psi) material, the next 40%-50% of the module is about 4.9x10⁴ kg/m² (70 psi) material and the top 40%-50% of the module is about 7.0x10⁴ kg/m² (100 psi) material. The higher strength material in the bottom of the module is preferably designed to secure reinforcement and beam connectors, the function and orientation of which is described below. The relatively soft layer (the intermediate layer) of material above the high strength material, together with the top layer which is preferably at least 35% stronger than the intermediate layer preferably act to keep an impacting vehicle down and prevent ramping even when the upward steps in the wall of the concrete base referred to above are encountered. In most forms of this embodiment, there will be at least one module of the first type (Type A) and one module of the second type (Type B). A barrier wall requiring only two modules, one of each type, would be suitable for areas where a low velocity of the impacting vehicle is anticipated. Where greater velocities are anticipated or where, for some other reason, a longer barrier wall is desired, the concrete base is lengthened and more modules of type A are provided to fill in the increased length of the concrete base. In most forms of this embodiment, there is usually only one module of type B. The type B module is preferably positioned at the end of the linear array of type A modules and is at the end of the concrete base and is immediately adjacent the roadside obstacle or PCB. Finally, the lower density, crushable material will preferably be of sufficient strength to enable the roadside barrier to act in a manner similar to a conventional concrete barrier wall to deflect vehicles impacting the roadside barrier at acute angles. In addition, the side runners mounted on or molded as part of the exterior wall portion of the concrete base of the second embodiment also acts to deflect vehicles impacting the roadside barrier. In the accompanying drawings: Fig. 1A is a side view depicting a vehicle which is about to impact a roadside barrier in a "head-on" direction. Fig. 1B is a view of the vehicle depicted in Fig. 1A which has impacted a roadside barrier and has crushed the lower density material positioned in a first composite section of the barrier. Fig. 1C is a side view of the vehicle depicted in Fig. 1A and 1B wherein the vehicle has passed through a first composite section of a roadside barrier The velocity of the vehicle in Fig. 1C is being reduced by the force required to crush the lower density, crushable material positioned in the upper portion of the intermediate section, while the velocity of the vehicle is further reduced by the coaction of the raised, reinforced concrete portion of the intermediate sections of the barrier with the undercarriage of the vehicle. Fig. 1D is a side view of the vehicle depicted in Figs. 1A through 1C wherein the vehicle has passed through the first composite section, and all of the intermediate sections and has finally been brought to rest before it encounters the end of the concrete barrier wall. Fig. 2 is a detailed side view of a advanced dynamic extension module. Fig. 3 is a cross-sectional view of an intermediate section of the advanced dynamic impact extension module depicted in Fig. 2. Fig. 4 is a perspective view of a final section of the advanced dynamic impact extension module depicted in Fig. 2 showing it attached to the end of the concrete barrier wall which it protect:. Fig. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the end of the module depicted in Fig. 2. Fig. 6 is another cross-sectional view of the end of the module depicted in Fig. 2. Fig. 7 is a cross-sectional view taken through the final section of the module depicted in Fig. 2. Fig. 8 is a cross-sectional view of an intermediate section of the module depicted in Fig. 2. Fig. 9 is a plan view showing an the barrier protecting the end of a concrete barrier wall. Fig. 10 is a plan view of an alternate arrangement of the barriers. Fig. 11 is a plan view of yet another alternate arrangement of the barriers. Figure 12 is a perspective view of a complete advance dynamic impact extension module of a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Figure 13 is a detailed side view of the preferred embodiment of the advanced dynamic extension module. Figure 14 is a detailed plan view of the preferred embodiment of the advanced dynamic extension module. Figure 15 is a detailed front view of the advanced dynamic extension module according to the preferred embodiment. Figure 16 is a rear view of the preferred embodiment of the advanced dynamic extension module. Figure 17 is a perspective view of a module of a first type of the preferred embodiment showing a suitable beam section and steel bar reinforcement. Figure 18 is a perspective view showing a suitable orientation of wire mesh reinforcement within the module of the first type of the preferred embodiment. Figure 19 shows an end view of the wire mesh and steel bar reinforcement within the module of the first type of the preferred embodiment. Figure 20 is an exploded perspective view of a portion of the advanced dynamic extension module showing how the modules are slidably insertable into the structural concrete base. Figure 21 is a module of a second type of the preferred embodiment showing the S-Beam and structural steel arranged in triangular fashion. Figure 22 shows an exploded and exposed front view of the advanced dynamic extension module detailing an exemplary orientation of reinforcement provided within the structural concrete base. Figures 1 to 11 are included for background information only and do not form a part of the invention Referring to Fig. 2, a plurality of linearly arrayed barrier wall sections, denoted as 22, 24 and 26 are positioned immediately in front of an end 27 of a concrete barrier wall 28. Referring now to Fig. 3, which is a view taken along section 3 of Fig. 2, it is shown that the several sections of the roadside barrier have a substantially identical cross-sectional configurations, which in turn are substantially identical to the cross-sectional configuration of the concrete barrier wall 28. Referring again to Fig. 2,, a first section 22 is a composite section comprised of a reinforced concrete portion 38 and 40 and a lower density, crushable material portion 34. The lower density, crushable material portion 34 is positioned above the reinforced concrete surfaces 38 and 40. In this embodiment of the invention, the lower density, crushable material 34 positioned above the reinforced concrete surfaces 38 and 40 will comprise at least two-thirds of the cross-sectional volume of the first section. Referring still to Fig. 2, the roadside barrier 20 will be provided with at least one intermediate section 24. The intermediate sections 24 are also composite sections wherein a lower portion 44 of each section 24 is comprised of reinforced concrete while an upper portion of 42 of each section is comprised of lower density, crushable material. Each intermediate section 24 is further characterized in that sections located near the first section 22 of a roadside barrier are comprised of a greater volume of low density, crushable material 42 than are the sections positioned closer to the end 27 of the concrete barrier wall 28 which the roadside barrier 20 protects. In this manner, the composition, and hence the proportion, of crushable material to reinforced concrete varies in each intermediate section 24 so that the intermediate sections 24 are comprised of a progressively lesser volume of low density, crushable material 42 as the linear distance from the first section 22 to each intermediate section 24 increases. The low density, crushable material 34 of the first section and the low density, crushable material 42 of each intermediate section are bonded to the reinforced concrete base of each section. Referring still to Fig. 2, in an alternate embodiment, reinforcing steel 36 is formed in the reinforced concrete sections 38, 40 and 44 so that a hooked portion of the reinforcing steel extends upwardly beyond the upper surface 38, 40 and 44 of the reinforced concrete. Thereafter, when the lower density, crushable material is formed in place on top of the reinforced concrete and is attached to the reinforced concrete, the lower density, crushable material will be further supported by the reinforcing steel 36, attached to the reinforced concrete. Referring still to Fig. 2, the roadside barrier 20 is further provided with a final barrier section 26. Final barrier section 26 has a front end 25, positioned toward the intermediate barrier sections 24 and a back end 48 positioned linearly, distally from the first section. The reinforced concrete 46 provided along the base of the final roadside barrier section 26 will increase rapidly in a stepped configuration through the longitudinal width of the final section 26 as depicted in Fig. 2 at numeral 48. Therefore, a vehicle passing through the first section 22 and all intermediate sections 24 will finally encounter the final roadside barrier section 26, the front end of the vehicle coming to rest at the rear, stepped portion 48 of the final barrier section 26. In this embodiment,, the cross-sectional volume of the front end 25 of the final section 26 is comprised of approximately half reinforced concrete 46, positioned along the bottom of the section 26, and half low density, crushable material 43 placed above, and on top of, the surface of the reinforced concrete base 46 of the final section 26. As depicted in Fig. 2, the final roadside barrier section 26 will, at its back end 48, be comprised entirely of reinforced concrete. This further enables the roadside barrier 20 to be fixedly attached to the welding end 27 of a concrete barrier wall 28. Referring to Fig. 4, a partially exploded perspective view of the final section 26 and the end 27 of a concrete barrier wall 28 is shown. As noted at 30 in Fig. 4 (and at numeral 30 in Fig. 2) the final section 26 of the roadside barrier 20 is preferably fixedly attached to the end 27 of a concrete barrier wall 28. In the embodiment shown, a channel-shaped splicing member 52, is provided with apertures to receive lag bolts 54 formed in the reinforced concrete of both the final section 26 of the roadside barrier, and the concrete barrier wall 28. In this embodiment, fasteners 56 are applied to the lag bolts 54 to secure a channel-shaped member 52 to the roadside barrier and to the concrete barrier wall. The individual sections of the advanced dynamic impact extension module 20 are also joined together, and may be so joined in a manner similar to the method used to join the module 20 the concrete barrier wall 28 (as indicated in Fig. 4). Referring now to Figs. 1A through 1D, the individual sections 22, 24, and 26 of a roadside barrier 20 are arranged in a linear array so that a vehicle 10 impacting the first section 22 in a "head-on" direction will encounter, in ascending order, a step-wise array of lower, reinforced concrete base sections as the vehicle crushes the crushable material above each reinforced concrete based portion of each section. As shown specifically in Figs. 1C and 1D, the raised, stepped array of reinforced concrete bases of the individual barrier sections will coact with the undercarriage of the vehicle 10 to further impede the forward progress of the vehicle 10 as the vehicle 10 moves through the barrier 20. The combined effect of the force exerted by the front of the vehicle 12 in crushing the crushable, low density material of each section, with the force expended by the vehicle 10 as the undercarriage of the vehicle 10 encounters drag caused by the raised stepped reinforced concrete portions of the individual barrier sections, coact to bring the vehicle 10 t a stop before the vehicle 10 encounters the end 27 of the concrete barrier wall 28. Referring again to Fig. 2, the density of the lower density, crushable material 34 in the first section 22 is less than the density of the lower density, crushable material 42 located in each intermediate section 24. In a similar manner, the density of the crushable material 42 provided in each intermediate section 24 increases as the distance from each individual intermediate section 24 to the first barrier section 22 increases. Finally, the density of the lower density, crushable material 43 provided in the final barrier section 26 is greater then the density of any of the material used in the lower density, crushable portions of the intermediate sections 24. However, it is a preferred function of the roadside barrier 20 that the lower density, crushable material used in each of the barrier sections 22, 24, and 26 be of sufficient strength to deflect a glancing impact from a vehicle impacting the sidewall surfaces of the barrier at an acute angle. Referring now to Fig. 8, a cross-sectional view of an intermediate section 24 of a roadway barrier is depicted. As shown, the composite highway lane barrier section 24 is a composite lane barrier having a lower, substantially non-crushable base component 44 and an upper crushable top component 42. In this embodiment, the lower substantially non-crushable base component 44 may be comprised of reinforced concrete wherein the reinforcing rods are shown at 60 and 64. In this embodiment the highway lane barrier rests atop the shoulder of the roadway 32, or may be conveniently placed immediately adjacent, and parallel to, the roadway. Referring again to Fig. 2, the base component (shown at 38, 40, 44, and 46) is configured to increase in height from a front end of the barrier (shown in cross-section in Fig. 3) to a back end 48 of the barrier 20 position proximate to a leading end 27 of a conventional highway lane barrier 28. The back end 48 of the barrier 20 is further configured to abut the leading end 27 of the conventional concrete lane barrier 28. In this embodiment, the upper component (denoted as 34, 42, and 42 in Fig. 2) rests upon, and is attached to, the individual base components of the barrier. As shown specifically in figs. 2 and 3, the height of the base component 38 of the barrier 20 at the front end of the first section 22 of the barrier is less than the road clearance of a vehicle impacting the barrier in a "head-on" direction. Roadway clearance may be defined as the vertical distance from the surface of the road to the undercarriage of a vehicle. This relationship is also clearly shown in Fig. 1B wherein a vehicle 10 is shown after impacting a barrier 20 and crushing the crushable material positioned over the base component 38 of the first section 22 of the barrier 20. In Fig. 1B, it is shown that the undercarriage of the vehicle 10 is able to clear the base component 38 of the first section 22 of the barrier 20. The height of base components 44, 46, and 48 of the intermediate sections of the barrier is greater than the road clearance of a vehicle 10 impacting the barrier. This is further shown specifically in Figs. 1C and 1D where the undercarriage of a vehicle 10 is shown coacting with the base components to create friction and drag between the base portions and the vehicle to further impede the forward progress of the vehicle 10 as it moves through the barrier. As shown specifically in Figs. 2, 3, and 5-8, the height of the base components of the barrier 20 increases in step-wise fashion from the front end of the barrier (section 22) to the back end of the barrier (section 26) as shown at 48. In this embodiment a plurality of intermediate sections 24 may also be provided between, and along the length of the barrier 20. These intermediate sections 24 interconnect the front section 22 with the back section 26 of the barrier. The intermediate sections 24 may further be characterized by variable density crushable top components from the front 22 of the barrier 20 to the back 48 of the barrier so that the crushable top components of the barrier crush under the influence of lesser impacting force near the front of the barrier while the crushable top components positioned near the back 48 of the barrier require significantly greater impacting force in order to be crushed. Therefore, the density of the crushable top components of the intermediate sections 24 also increases in step-wise fashion from the front of the barrier to the back of the barrier. Referring to Fig. 9, a planar view of an array of roadside barriers 66 is shown. In this application, roadway barriers 66 are shown positioned between parallel lanes of traffic flow denoted by the arrows. In this configuration, roadside barriers, or advanced dynamic impact extension modules 66 are placed on either side of, and in front of, and end 27 of a conventional concrete barrier wall 28. With this configuration, any vehicle, travelling in the direction denoted by an arrow, which strays from the roadway toward the end 27 of the concrete barrier wall 28, will encounter at least one module 66 which will prohibit the vehicle from impacting the end 27 of the concrete barrier wall 28 and will safely slow the vehicle without causing injury to the vehicle's occupants. In a similar manner, Fig. 10 depicts an arrangement whereby a plurality of impact modules 66 may be arranged to protect opposed ends 27 of a concrete barrier wall 28. As shown in Fig. 10, when a concrete barrier wall 28 is used to divide opposing lanes of traffic (again as indicated by the arrows) impact modules 66 may be placed before each end 27 of the concrete barrier wall 28. Further, in this arrangement of embodiments, additional impact modules 66 will be placed parallel to the concrete barrier wall ends, adjacent the concrete barrier wall in a direction toward the direction of traffic. Therefore, the modules 66 protect a vehicle from by-passing the impact module 66 positioned before the end 27 of the concrete barrier wall. The adjacently placed modules 66 are positioned slightly behind the leading edge 80 of the module 66 attached to the concrete barrier wall 28 in order to provide increased vehicle protection. Fig. 11 depicts an alternate arrangement of an advanced dynamic impact extension module 66. In Figure 12, a structural concrete base, denoted as 70, is positionable immediately in front of a concrete barrier wall (not shown). In Figure 12, it is seen that a series of module sections 72 and 84 are arranged in linear fashion atop the structural concrete base. These module sections are each of substantially identical cross sectional configurations, and are generally in rectangular shape. The modules are slidably insertable within a channel of the structural concrete base. Referring again to Figure 12, and also to Figure 17, a plurality of modules of a first type 72 are provided which are composite sections comprising reinforced concrete portion 74 and two layers of crushable concrete material 76 and 78. The bottom portion 74 of module 72 is about 10%-15% of the total height of the module and is composed of semi-crushable, higher density material. A center portion 76 of module 72, being 40%-50% of the total height of the module, is composed of low density crushable material which is on the order of 4.9x10⁴ kg/m² (70 psi). The top portion 78 of module 72, being 40%-50% of the total height of the module is composed of crushable material 35%-45% stronger than the low strength material of the intermediate layer 76. In this embodiment, the higher density material 74 positioned in the lower portion of modules 72 is adaptable to secure S-Beam or other wide flange beam sections 80, the upper flange and substantially all of the web portion of which are embedded within the module sections 72, but the bottom flange portion 82 of the S-Beam, protruding slightly below the lower surface of modules 72. The other two layers 76 and 78 coact to keep an impacting vehicle down and to prevent ramping of an impacting vehicle. Referring still to Figure 12, the roadside barrier 68 is provided with a module of a second type 84. The module of the second type 84 is positioned at the end of the linear array of the plurality of modules of the first type 72 and is positionable immediately adjacent a roadside obstacle. The module 84 is a composite section comprising the same orientation of concrete or crushable material as in the modules of the first type 72. Therefore, module 84 also has a lower portion 74 of semi-crushable higher density material, an intermediate portion 76 of low density material and an upper portion 78. The modules of both the first type 72 and the second type 84 are arranged in a linear array so that a vehicle impacting the front end portion of the barrier wall 68 in a head-on direction will encounter in successive fashion each of the modules, crushing first the plurality of modules of the first type 72 and finally reaching the module of the second type 84. Referring still to Figure 12 and also to Figure 13, it is seen that the concrete base portion 70 of the barrier wall increases in step-wise fashion, stepping upward at defined intervals beginning from the front end 86 of the structural concrete base 70 toward a back end 88 immediately adjacent a roadside obstacle. As shown in a preferred form of this embodiment, the height of the concrete base at the front end of the barrier wall is about 0.88-0.15 m (three to six inches). At a distance of about 0.9 m (three feet) along the base, the sides of the concrete base section step upward beginning the formation of walls 92 to a channel 90 of the concrete base. The initial step is approximately 0.8 m (three inches) in height; thus the wall 92 to the channel 90 at this point is at a height of about 0.8 m (three inches) while the total height of the concrete base is about 0.23 m (nine inches). At 1.8 m (six feet) further along the concrete base 80, being a total of about 2.7 m (nine feet) from the front end 86 of the barrier wall 68, another 0.08 m (three inch) step increase occurs raising the height of the wall 92 of the channel to 0.15 m (six inches) with the total height of the concrete base 70 being 0.3 m (one foot) or more. The elevation for the remaining 3.6 m (12 feet) of the concrete base is at this height of 0.3 (one foot) or more with the channel wall 92 height being about 0.15 (six inches). The increase in elevation may also be due to a gradual sloped increase beginning at the front of the base proceeding toward to back end. This stepped or sloped increase in the elevation of the structural concrete base 70 will coact with the undercarriage of an impacting vehicle to further impede the forward progress of the vehicle as the vehicle moves through the roadside barrier 68. The combined effect of the resistance exerted by the crushable portions of the module sections 72 and 84 acting against the front and of an impacting vehicle, together with the resistance exerted by the coaction of the undercarriage of an impacting vehicle as it encounters drag caused by the raised stepped or sloped elevation of the structural concrete base 70, result in the vehicle coming to a stop before the vehicle encounters the end portion of the concrete barrier wall or roadside obstacle. Referring still to Figure 13, a section 94 of the lower back end portion of the concrete base is adapted to be fixably attached to the end of a concrete barrier wall as shown in Figure 4. Referring still to Figure 13, and also to Figure 14 which shows a plan view of the barrier wall, the roadside barrier will be provided with vertical dowel holes 96 placed at locations in the walls 92 of the channel 90 of the concrete base 70 through which anchoring dowels will be inserted to secure the structural concrete base 70 to a roadway surface. Referring now to Figure 22, therein is depicted a detailed view of the front end 86 of the structural concrete base 70 showing a possible orientation of structural reinforcement 98 of the concrete base 70. Embedded within the channel 90 of the structural concrete base 70 are two S-beams or other wide flange beams 100, symmetrically arranged on each side of the center axis of the concrete base, with the upper flange of the beams 100 being flush with the bottom of the channel portion 90, the beam web being perpendicular to the plane of the channel 90 and the beams being separated from each other by a space sufficient to receive the web and flange portion of a corresponding beam section protruding from the bottom face of the type A modules. In a preferred form of this embodiment these two beams 100 run a distance of about 5.4 m (18 feet) beginning at the front end 86 of the structural concrete base 70 and terminating about 0.9 m (three feet) from the back end 88 of the structural concrete base 70. The beam sections 80 which were embedded in the modules of the first type 72 are slidably insertable in the space provided by the beams 100 embedded within the channel 90 of the structural concrete base 70. Figure 20 shows an exploded cross-sectional view of the manner of slidably inserting the modules of the first type 72 between the beams 100 embedded within the channel 90 of the concrete base 70. Referring again to Figure 22, therein is shown the attachment of a longitudinal member 102 in the nature of a pipe side runner, attachable to the wall portion 92 of the concrete barrier 68 at a point where the wall portion 92 is at its maximum height. The side runner can also be molded or formed as an integral part of the wall itself. In the preferred form of this embodiment the longitudinal member 102 begins at a point about 2.7 m (nine feet) from the front end 86 of the roadside barrier 68 and continuing thereafter for about 3 m (10 feet). The ends 104 of the pipe side runner are cut diagonally so as to lessen the area of a blunt end which could damage an impacting vehicle. The longitudinal member 102 is suitable for redirecting a vehicle impacting at an acute angle back into a lane of traffic. Referring now to Figure 17, therein is depicted a module of the first type 72 showing the beam sections 80 which are slidably insertable into the beams 100 embedded within the channel 90 of the structural concrete base 70. Connecting members 106 are overlain on the top flanges of the beam sections 80 in such a manner as to connect the two sections 80 and to strengthen their alignment. Referring now to Figure 18, therein is depicted a type of wire mesh reinforcement 108 capable of being embedded within the module of the first type 72 and adapted to provide reinforcing strength to the module. Figure 19 is an end view showing the orientation of the wire mesh 108. Surrounding the wire mesh in generally rectangular shape is reinforcing steel or wire 110 adapted to reinforce the module 72 and maintain the orientation of the wire mesh 108. Figure 15 depicts a front view similar to that shown in Figure 22 of the structural concrete base 70 with the modules 72 sitting atop thereof. Figure 16 depicts a rear view of the barrier wall 68 showing the modules of the second type 84 sitting within the channel 90 of the concrete base 70. The module of the second type 84 has embedded entirely within it a steel pipe and beam triangle reinforcement. As shown in Figure 21, a beam 112 is completely embedded within the module of the second type 84 and forms the horizontal leg of a right triangle. The vertical leg of the right triangle is formed by the reinforcing member 114 extending vertically upward almost the entire height of the module 84, and hypotenuse 116 angling downward from the vertical leg 114 to join the opposite end of the beam 112. The triangular steel pipe and beam reinforcement of Figure 21 is provided so that if a vehicle is traveling at sufficient velocity such that it passes through the plurality of modules of the first type 72, it will finally encounter the final module 84 which is of the second type. The triangular reinforcement in module 84 will cause the front end of the vehicle to rise upwardly to avoid impacting the concrete barrier segment to which this embodiment of the invention is attached. Referring again to Figure 16, the module 84 may be attachable to the structural concrete base 70 by means of dowels inserted through dowel holes 118 drilled through the concrete base walls 92 and passing through the web section of the beam 112. Two such dowel holes 118 are provided along the length of the module of the second type. Referring again to Figure 17, in this preferred embodiment, the density of the lower portion 74 of the modules 72 and 84 is substantially greater than the density of the intermediate 76 and upper 78 sections of the modules 72 and 84. The greater density material 74 is of sufficient strength to secure the beam sections 80 embedded in the modules 72 and to secure the beam 112 entirely embedded within the module 84. The intermediate section 76 is of less dense material than the upper most section 78 and both sections 76 and 78 are substantially less dense than section 74. The intermediate section 76 and upper most section 78 are adaptable to prevent an impacting vehicle from ramping with the upper most layer 78 being of sufficient strength to actually hold down a vehicle and prevent it from rising faster than the stepped or sloped increase in the elevation of the concrete barrier section 70 would provide. Various materials may be used for the lower density, crushable material such as low strength, porous concrete; styrofoams; or plastics. Further, the cross-sectional configuration of the roadside barrier itself may be varied in order to accommodate various barrier wall configurations, or to provide increased vehicle protection in areas of high traffic density and high traffic speed. In this respect, the first 2.4-6 m (eight to twenty feet) or the barrier module may be provided with a cross section that is different than the remaining portion of the barrier module, or the concrete barrier wall itself.

Claims: A roadside barrier for use in preventing vehicles from impacting an obstacle, the barrier comprising a structural concrete base section (70) adaptable at its upper surface to receive rectangularly shaped crushable modules (72,84), wherein the base section defines a channel along the upper surface of the base and wherein the rectangular modules are received within the channel and are arranged end-to-end; a first type of module (72) comprising a composite module comprising three layers (74,76,78) of crushable material of varying strengths, wherein the lowest layer (74) comprises a high strength material, the intermediate layer (76) immediately above the lowest layer comprises a low strength material, and the uppermost layer (78) comprises material having a strength above the low strength material and below the high strength material; a second type of module (84) comprising a composite module comprising three layers (74,76,78) of crushable material of varying strengths substantially the same as the first module type (72), the second module type being positionable at the end of a linear array of modules of the first type (72) at the end of the structural concrete base (70) immediately adjacent to the roadside obstacle; a structural reinforcement (112,114) within said second module type (84) with the ability to impart upward movement to an impacting vehicle; and means (82,100) for fixedly attaching the modules of the first type (72), and means (100,112) for fixedly attaching the modules of the second type (84), to the base (70). A barrier according to claim 1, wherein the modules of the first type (72) are arranged linearly so that a module of the first type is positioned at a front end of the concrete base (70) closest to a path of oncoming vehicles with a linear array of such modules extending in a line away from the first module towards the module of the second type (84) and the roadside obstacle, in a direction parallel to a line depicting the flow of oncoming vehicles. A barrier according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the structural concrete base (70) is positioned linearly having a front end of the base positioned closest to oncoming vehicles and a back end adjacent to the roadside obstacle; wherein the width of the base near the front end has an outward taper toward the back end; and wherein the width of the base remains constant up towards the back end of the base. A barrier according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the elevation of the structural concrete base (70) increases in a step-wise fashion along its length such that walls are formed upward from the channel of the concrete base. A barrier according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the elevation of the structural concrete base (70) increases in a gradual sloping fashion along its length beginning at the front end such that walls are formed upward from the channel of the concrete base. A barrier according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein two S-beams or other wide flange sections (100) are embedded in the structural concrete base (70) with the upper flanges of the beams being flush with the floor of the channel of the structural concrete base and running parallel to the longitudinal axis of the structural concrete base beginning at the front end of the concrete base and running toward the back end. A barrier according to claim 6, wherein each module of the first type (72) has embedded therein and protruding from the bottom portion thereof two separate beams sections (80) positioned at each end of the module so as to be slidably insertable between the two beams (100) embedded within the channel of the structural concrete base (70), and wherein two reinforcing members (106) overlie and are connected to the top flange of the beam sections and are embedded entirely within the modules (72), to strengthen the alignment of the beam sections (80). A barrier according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the walls of the channel and each module of the second type (84) include matching dowel holes (118) for receiving dowels to secure the module of the second type into place on the channel portion of the concrete base (70). A barrier according to claim 8, wherein the dowel holes (118) are provided in the channel walls for receiving dowels to secure the base (70) on a roadway surface. A barrier according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein longitudinal side runners (102) are attached to the sides of the walls of the concrete base (70); and are configured to produce redirection of vehicles that collide with the barrier at an angle along the side. A barrier according to claim 10, wherein the longitudinal side runners (102) are integrally molded or formed as part of the wall portion of the concrete base (70) which are configured to produce redirection of vehicles that collide with the barrier at an angle along the side. A barrier according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein all of the modules of the first type (72) include tubular wire mesh reinforcement (108), the longitudinal axis of which is oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the module sections, and further including reinforcing steel surrounding the wire mesh and generally paralleling the sides of the rectangular modules. A barrier according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the module of the second type (84) includes a triangular steel pipe and beam reinforcement (114,116) wherein an S-beam or other wide flange section (112) is completely embedded within the module in the lower portion thereof and runs substantially the entire length thereof, and wherein the steel pipe reinforcement (114,116) extends upward from the upper surface of the beam (112) and then angles downwardly to rejoin the beam, the triangular arrangement being configured to cause an impacting vehicle to climb vertically to miss the front end of a roadside obstacle.

Inventors: IVEY, DON L.
Applicants: THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
Application year: 1990
Main classification: E01F15
IPC codes: E01F15, F16F7