Optical system

Abstract: An optical system, useful as a magnetometer and as a polarization controller, is disclosed. The system includes a source of electromagnetic radiation (330), a detector of electromagnetic radiation (350), and a magnetizable medium (310) via which the source and detector communicate with one another. The system further includes apparatus (360,370) for forming at least two adjacent magnetic domains (380,390) separated by at least one domain wall (400).

Description: Field of the Invention The invention pertains to optical systems. Background of the Invention It is known that optical materials exhibiting the Faraday effect (i.e., magnetic circular birefringence) can be used for the detection of magnetic fields. That is, when a beam of linearly polarized light passes through a thin film of magneto-optical material extending transverse to the propagation direction, at least a portion of the beam may pass through one or more magnetic domains, each capable of rotating the polarization of that portion of the beam that it intercepts. Significantly, the rotation produced by any one such domain is generally different from the rotation, if any, caused by adjacent material. Thus, the polarization, or net polarization, of a light beam can be changed by moving magnetic domains laterally, or by expanding or contracting magnetic domains, laterally, in order to intercept a greater or smaller portion of the light beam. Such motion is readily brought about by exposing the material to magnetic fields, and the resulting polarization changes are readily measured. As a result, practitioners have been able to employ these phenomena for the detection of magnetic fields. However, these methods are relatively insensitive because the light beam passes through only a thin layer of magnet-optical material, thus experiencing a relatively small polarization rotation. Until now, practitioners have been unsuccessful in providing a magneto-optical detector for magnetic fields that employs a longitudinally extending magneto-optical material medium. It should be noted that a thin film device having displaceable magnetic domain walls is described in United States Patent No. 4,079,460 which issued on March 14, 1978 under the title "Device Operating with the Displacement of Magnetic Domain Walls." According to the present invention there is provided an optical system as defined in claim 1. The invention involves an optical system in which electromagnetic radiation passes from a source, through a magnetizable medium, to a detector. Within the medium lies at least one magnetic domain wall separating at least two adjacent regions of the medium, such that light propagating from the source to the detector passes through the two adjacent regions and the domain wall separating them. Moreover, the longitudinal (i.e., along the propagation direction) position of the domain wall is responsive to external magnetic fields applied to the medium. As a consequence, the net Faraday rotation suffered by linearly polarized light propagated through the medium is dependent upon the applied magnetic field. Brief Description of the Drawings FIG. 1 schematically depicts an exemplary optical system incorporating a waveguide, according to the invention. FIG. 2 is a graph of magnetic bias field versus position relative to the waveguide of the optical system of FIG. 1. FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of the waveguide of the optical system of FIG. 1. Detailed Description By means of an arrangement of permanent magnets or an electromagnet, one can readily create a magnetic field configuration, here called a "bias field," that magnetizes a piece of such material so as to create in the material at least two adjacent magnetic domains, separated by one or more domain walls, and with at least one of the domains having a component of magnetization parallel or antiparallel to the optical propagation direction. (A magnetic domain is a region within a material which is magnetized in a uniform direction throughout the region. A domain wall is a region in the material separating two different magnetic domains and in which the magnetization changes continuously from one domain to the other. A domain wall in, for example, yttrium iron garnet, also known as YIG, is typically about 1000 Angstroms thick.) Because oppositely polarized domains cause opposite optical rotations, the net rotation suffered by light traversing, for example, two oppositely magnetized domains is sensitive to the path difference, i.e., the difference between the optical path lengths in the two domains. The path difference is readily changed by subjecting the piece of material to an external magnetic field, i.e., the magnetic field to be detected, in addition to the bias field. In response to the external field, the domain wall moves, thereby increasing the length traversed in one domain, and decreasing the length traversed in the other domain. In consequence, the net optical rotation is changed from its value when there is no external magnetic field. Because the direction and distance that the domain wall moves depend on the orientation and strength of the external field, the resulting change in the optical rotation is readily used to measure the magnitude of one component of the external field, e.g., the component causing motion of the domain wall. Although the above-described effect is readily demonstrated in bulk materials, it is preferable to use magnetizable, optically transmissive material in the form of a thin-film waveguide. When a bulk material is used, it is necessary to employ lenses to direct light through the magneto-optically active region. However, when a thin-film waveguide is used, lenses are not necessary. Instead, a thin-film waveguide is readily placed in optical communication with a source of light and a detector of light, by means, for example, of an optical fiber or pair of fibers. As a result, devices employing thin-film waveguides instead of bulk materials are readily miniaturized. It is even more preferable if the thin-film waveguide is essentially free of linear birefringence for one or several modes of optical propagation at the particular wavelength of light used. That is, the factors responsible for the linear birefringence found in thin films of, for example, YIG have been identified. One of these factors is what is here termed shape linear birefringence, which is due to the presence of discontinuities in refractive index at the film-air and film-substrate interfaces. These discontinuities affect the TM polarization component differently from the way they affect the TE polarization component, producing an effective refractive index anisotropy in the film. Significantly, the magnitude of the shape linear birefringence increases as the thickness of the film is decreased. A second factor, commonly termed stress-induced linear birefringence, is due to a lattice mismatch between the film and the substrate. This mismatch subjects the film to either a compressive or tensile stress in the plane of the film, which also has the effect of inducing a refractive index anisotropy in the film. Generally, the magnitude of the stress-induced linear birefringence is independent of film thickness. Yet a third factor, commonly termed growth-induced linear birefringence, is due to a non-random distribution of certain ions in the film crystal lattice, produced by the conventional techniques used to epitaxially grow films on substrates. That is, in the case of, for example, YIG films, the Y (yttrium) cation is often partially replaced with one or more different cations, e.g., Bi or Nd, to alter the properties of the films. When such a film is grown on a substrate using conventional techniques, e.g., liquid phase epitaxy (LPE), the resulting distribution of the replacement cations in the direction perpendicular to the plane of the film is often different from the corresponding distribution in the plane of the film. This difference in the cation distributions also gives rise to a refractive index anisotropy. As with the stress-induced linear birefringence, the magnitude of the growth-induced linear birefringence is generally independent of film thickness. In many cases, the sign of the stress-induced and/or growth-induced linear birefringence is opposite to that of the shape linear birefringence. Thus, these different sources of linear birefringence can be used to cancel each other to produce zero net linear birefringence. For example, R. Wolfe et al, "Thin-Film Garnet Materials with Zero Linear Birefringence for Magneto-Optic Waveguide Devices (Invited)", J. Applied Phys. , Vol. 63, (1988) pp. 3099-3103, describes a method for fabricating a thin film, waveguiding, polarization rotator which achieves essentially zero net linear birefringence. Wolfe et al reported that in epitaxial garnet films, the net linear birefringence can be reduced to small values by (1) growing single-mode multilayer films to minimize the shape effect, (2) growing the films in compression to control the stress-induced effect, and (3) annealing at high temperatures to eliminate the growth-induced effect. The remaining birefringence can be reduced to zero by growing the top active layer so thick that the shape effect is smaller in magnitude than the stress effect, and then thinning it by chemical etching until the effects exactly cancel each other at a particular wavelength. An alternative method is to begin with a thin top layer such that the magnitude of the shape effect is relatively large, and then to deposit a dielectric layer such as silicon nitride of the proper thickness to reduce the shape effect so that it exactly cancels the stress effect. If there is essentially no linear birefringence, the optical rotation in each magnetic domain is proportional to the length traversed in that domain. Accordingly, the change in the net optical rotation due to a displacement of a domain wall is proportional to the displacement. In linearly birefringent material, on the other hand, the optical rotation is not proportional to the length traversed in each domain. Instead, as noted, the optical rotation has an oscillatory dependence on the length traversed, and is bounded by a relatively small peak amplitude. Consequently, when optical waveguides that are substantially linearly birefringent are subjected to external magnetic fields, they produce changes in optical rotation that are limited to relatively small values. Furthermore, the corresponding displacements of the domain walls are effective only if they are limited to a relatively small fraction, for example one-fourth, of a birefringent period. FIG. 1 depicts an exemplary optical system which is useful as a magnetometer, according to the present invention. This system includes a magnetizable, thin-film optical waveguide 310 which is, for example, in the form of a ridge (as depicted), formed on the upper surface of a substrate 320. The system also includes light source 330 optically coupled to waveguide 310, either by optical transmission directly through the air, or, preferably, via optical fiber 340. The system further includes an optical detector 350, also optically coupled to waveguide 310, either by transmission through the air, or preferably, via an optical fiber. If detector 350 is optically coupled via an optical fiber, either a separate fiber may be used, or detector 350 may be coupled via the same fiber as the source, i.e., via fiber 340. In use, waveguide 310 is subjected to a magnetic bias field created by bias magnets 360 and 370. The bias field creates oppositely magnetized magnetic domains 380 and 390, separated by domain wall 400. Light, from source 330, which enters waveguide 310 is initially linearly polarized, either by transmitting the light through a polarizing optical fiber, or by transmitting it through a polarization maintaining fiber if source 330 provides polarized light, or by transmitting it through a polarizer 410. (The structure and function of polarizer 410 are described below.) Light which exits waveguide 310 after having experienced a net optical rotation is analyzed, for example, by transmission through a polarizing optical fiber, or by transmission through a polarizer, or by direct analysis of the ratio of the intensities of the two principal modes transmitted by a polarization maintaining fiber. Preferably, the light makes a double pass through the waveguide by reflecting from mirrored surface 420, and exits through, and is analyzed by, the same polarizer that polarized the entering light, i.e., polarizer 410. Thin-film optical waveguide 310 has its easy direction of magnetization parallel to the propagation direction of the waveguide. Such a waveguide is readily made, for example, by growing an epitaxial film of YIG on a substrate of gadolinium gallium garnet, also known as GGG. As noted, optical channeling takes place in the YIG because at the useful wavelengths, YIG has an index of refraction that is greater than both that of air and that of the underlying substrate material, GGG. In order to create a pair of oppositely magnetized domains, the bias field must reverse direction at some longitudinal position within the waveguide. (For purposes of this discussion, "longitudinal" means along the direction of optical propagation.) The bias magnet or magnets 360 and 370 that create the bias field are arranged so that the reversal is not abrupt, but rather occurs smoothly over a finite length within the waveguide. That is, there is a region within the waveguide, here called the "gradient region," over which the bias field drops smoothly from a maximum amplitude to zero, reverses direction, and grows again to a maximum amplitude (in the reverse direction) as a function of longitudinal position within the waveguide. (See FIG. 2). Within the gradient region, the bias field has a finite, although generally spatially dependent, gradient in the longitudinal direction. The stable location of a domain wall is the position within the gradient region where the magnetic field is zero. For purposes of this discussion, the point on the longitudinal axis where the magnetic field is zero is called the "crossing point." Thus the location of a crossing point determines the stable location of the corresponding domain wall. The crossing point undergoes a longitudinal displacement when an external magnetic field, i.e., the magnetic field to be detected, having a longitudinal component is added to the bias field. The displacement is directed from the region where the bias field is parallel to the external field, toward the region where the bias field is antiparallel to the external field. Whenever a crossing point undergoes such a displacement, the domain wall located at that crossing point undergoes a corresponding displacement. The effect in a ferromagnetic material such as YIG is for a magnetic domain that is magnetized parallel to the external field to grow at the expense of a neighboring domain magnetized antiparallel to the external field. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the waveguiding medium is a YIG film epitaxially grown on a GGG substrate. The refractive index profile of the YIG film is tailored to provide a local waveguiding maximum, as described, for example, in U.S. Patent No. 4,762,384. If this condition is satisfied, there are only one or several guided modes at the wavelength of interest, and as a consequence, the modes that are able to propagate within the waveguide are limited to those modes for which the waveguide is essentially free of linear birefringence. As explained in the above-cited patent, a YIG film having a local waveguiding maximum is readily made either by providing a YIG layer having a continuously varying refractive index profile, or by providing at least two contiguous YIG layers of uniform composition but different refractive indices, thus defining a discontinuous refractive index profile. As described in U.S. Patent No. 4,762,384, the selectivity of the waveguide for the desired mode can be further enhanced by incorporating, between the waveguiding YIG film and the GGG substrate, a layer that selectively absorbs all modes except for those guided solely by the desired waveguiding layer, e.g., by the uppermost YIG layer. If, for example, a two-layer film of YIG is employed, as shown in FIG. 3, then the bottom layer 430 is, for example, about 4 µm thick and is epitaxially grown on a GGG substrate 320. The upper layer 440, which is, for example, about 3.5 µm thick, is grown on the bottom layer 430 and has a slightly higher refractive index, i.e., a refractive index which is at least 0.1 percent, but no more than about 5 percent, higher. The top surface of the YIG film is, for example, etched to form a ridge (which thus serves as the waveguide) having dimensions of, for example, 10 µm in width and 0.5 µm in height. A polarizer 410 is readily integrated with the film. The polarizer 410 includes a metal film, e.g., an aluminum film, typically 1 mm long and 0.1 µm thick, separated from the thin film waveguide by a spacer layer of, e.g., silicon dioxide. The thickness of the spacer layer, typically about 0.05 µm, is chosen so that the evanescent fields of the guided modes penetrate to the metal film, which acts as a polarizer in the sense that it preferentially absorbs the TM mode. Alternatively, a polarizer is readily integrated with the end of optical fiber 340 adjacent waveguide 310 (see FIG. 1) by cutting a notch or step having a flat bottom in the cladding of fiber 340 and depositing a metal film on the bottom of the notch or step. The end 460 of the ridge opposite the polarizing end 470 is preferably polished and coated with metal to provide a mirror 420 such that light impinging on end 460 from within the waveguide is reflected back through the waveguide in the counterpropagating direction. A typical length for the waveguide is about 5 mm. Referring to FIG. 1, optical fiber 340 is optically coupled to the polarizing end of the waveguide, for example, by bringing an end of the optical fiber near to, e.g., within a few optical wavelengths of, the end of the waveguide. The other end of the optical fiber is connected to a 2 X 2 optical coupler 480. Communicating with the optical fiber by way of the coupler is light source 330, preferably a solid state laser, for injecting light into the waveguide, a reference detector 490, for measuring the intensity of light entering the waveguide, and signal detector 350, for measuring the intensity of light exiting the waveguide. Additionally, an optical isolator 500 between light source 330 and coupler 480 prevents reflected, counterpropagating light from re-entering the light source. Bias magnets 360 and 370 are, for example, a pair of antiparallel bar magnets. Waveguide 310 lies between magnets 360 and 370, and within or slightly above or below the plane containing the magnets. The waveguide is rotated so that the longitudinal axis of the waveguide (i.e., the optical propagation axis) crosses the magnetic centerline (i.e., the intersection of the median plane of the two magnets with the plane of the waveguide). For example, the longitudinal axis and the magnetic centerline may cross at an angle of 15°. The point where the magnetic centerline and the longitudinal axis of the waveguide intersect is the crossing point. The position of the crossing point along the longitudinal axis is adjusted by moving the waveguide along the magnetic centerline, while maintaining the rotational orientation of the waveguide. Preferably, the crossing point is positioned such that light is rotated by 22.5° in transit from polarizer 410, through waveguide 310, to mirror 420, and then, after refection, is rotated an additional 22.5° from mirror 420 back to polarizer 410; i.e., a total of 45°. A net rotation of 45° by the bias field is preferable because it affords the greatest sensitivity. That is, for any rotation between 0° and 90°, some fraction of the entering light that has been polarized by the polarizer is, after rotation in the waveguide, transmitted by the polarizer when it exits the waveguide. The relationship between fraction transmitted upon exit and optical rotation is expressed by: I tr /I ent = cos² ϑ, where I tr is the intensity of exiting light transmitted by the polarizer, I ent is the intensity of the light entering the polarizer, and ϑ is the net rotation. This expression varies most rapidly with ϑ when ϑ is equal to 45° and, consequently, that is where the measurement technique is most sensitive. In addition, this expression has an approximately linear dependence on ϑ over a limited range of values near 45°, thus simplifying the interpretation of the measurement in that range. For example, if ϑ lies between 32.5° and 57.5°, the expression deviates from linearity by no more than 10%. It has further been found, that by placing the waveguide within the magnetic field region of an electromagnet, and by causing electric current to flow in the electromagnet, one can control, at will, the optical rotation of light propagating in the waveguide. Thus, the inventive waveguide can be used as a polarization controller. By rapidly moving the domain wall back and forth, one can readily modulate the polarization. EXAMPLE Two layers of modified YIG were epitaxially grown on a GGG substrate. The top layer had a thickness of about 3.5 µm, while the lower layer had a thickness of about 4 µm. In addition, the top layer had a refractive index that was about 0.5% larger than the refractive index of the lower layer. A ridge 10 µm wide and 0.5 µm high was etched into the top surface. The layers and substrate were cut to a length of 3 mm and the ends of the layers were polished. Light from a color center laser at 1.50 µm was coupled through a polarization maintaining fiber into the TE₀ mode of the top layer by positioning an end of the fiber near the edge of the waveguide. The light emerging from the far end of the waveguide was collimated with a microscope objective lens, passed through a Glan-Thompson prism analyzer and detected with a germanium PIN detector. With the two layers magnetically saturated in a direction parallel to the ridge (i.e., parallel to the longitudinal axis), the emerging light was found to be polarized at 45° to the input direction with an extinction ratio of 15 to 1, indicating that there was a small linear birefringence which gave rise to elliptical polarization of the rotated light in this mode. A pair of antiparallel bar magnets 2.5 cm long and 1.0 cm apart were positioned 1.0 cm above the ridge waveguide. Their center line was rotated by 15° from the longitudinal axis, and they were moved to a position where the output light was polarized parallel to the input light. The measured longitudinal component of the magnetic field as a function of position perpendicular to the longitudinal axis is shown in FIG. 2. With the analyzer set at 45°, the intensity of the output light was measured as a function of a longitudinal, d.c. magnetic field applied by a solenoid mounted concentric with the output lens. The output intensity varied linearly with this applied field up to 18 oersteds (oe), and was repeatable to within 0.1 oe as the field was varied up and down over this range. Above 18 oe, the output intensity was no longer linear with the applied field.

Claims: An optical polarization-rotating system, comprising: a source (330) of electromagnetic radiation; a detector (350) of electromagnetic radiation capable of optical communication with said source; a magnetizable medium (310) such that said source and detector optically communicate by transmission of electromagnetic radiation through said medium; and means (360,370) for producing at least one magnetic domain wall (400) in said medium separating at least two adjacent regions (380,390) of said medium; CHARACTERIZED IN THAT said medium is disposed relative to said source and to said detector such that at least a portion of the electromagnetic radiation from said source is detected by said detector only after passing sequentially through one of said adjacent regions, then through said domain wall, and then through the other of said adjacent regions; the position of said domain wall is movable along the propagation direction of the electromagnetic radiation; and the magnetization in the at least two adjacent regions is in the plane of light propagation, and is different for each of said regions. The optical polarization-rotating system of claim 1, wherein said medium is a thin film optical waveguide. The optical polarization-rotating system of claim 2, wherein said waveguide is essentially free of linear birefringence. The optical polarization-rotating system of claim 1, wherein said medium has a composition which includes iron and oxygen. The optical polarization-rotating system of claim 4, wherein said composition further includes yttrium. The optical polarization-rotating system of claim 2, further comprising a first optical fiber having first and second ends, said first end being optically coupled to said source, and said second end being adjacent and optically coupled to said waveguide. The optical polarization-rotating system of claim 6, further comprising a second optical fiber having first and second ends, said first end of the second fiber being optically coupled to said detector, and said second end of the second fiber being adjacent and optically coupled to said waveguide. The optical polarization-rotating system of claim 6, further comprising a polarizer on said second end of the first fiber or overlying said waveguide, adjacent said second end of the first fiber. The optical polarization-rotating system of claim 7, further comprising an analyzer on said second end of the second fiber or overlying said waveguide, adjacent said second end of the second fiber. The optical polarization-rotating system of claim 6, wherein said first optical fiber is a polarizing fiber. The optical polarization-rotating system of claim 6, wherein said first optical fiber is a polarization maintaining fiber. The optical polarization-rotating system of claim 1, wherein said medium is a thin-film optical waveguide having a polarizing end and a reflective end, further comprising: an optical fiber having first and second ends, said first end being optically coupled to said source and said detector, and said second end being optically coupled to said polarizing end; means, on said second end or overlying said polarizing end, for linearly polarizing electromagnetic radiation entering said polarizing end and for analyzing electromagnetic radiation exiting said polarizing end; and a mirror on said reflective end for reflecting electromagnetic radiation within said waveguide. The system of claim 1, further comprising means for moving said domain wall, said moving means being responsive to an electric current and/or voltage.

Inventors: LIEBERMAN ROBERT ARTHUR, WOLFE RAYMOND, LIEBERMAN, ROBERT ARTHUR, WOLFE, RAYMOND
Applicants: AT & T CORP, AT&T CORP.
Application year: 1990
Main classification: G02F1
IPC codes: G01R33, G02B27, G02B6, G02F1