A phonetic Hidden Markov Model speech synthesizer

Abstract: A method and a system for synthesizing speech from unrestricted text, based on the principle of associating to a written string of text the sequence of speech features vectors that most probably model the corresponding speech utterance. The synthesizer is based on the interaction between two different Ergodic Hidden Markov Models: an acoustic model reflecting the phonotactical constrains and a phonetic model interfacing phonemic transcription to the speech features representation.

Description: The present invention relates to the field of speech synthesis and regards a new technique to synthesize speech from unrestricted written text. Text-to-speech synthesis is usually obtained by computing, for each sentence to be synthesized, an intonative contour and the spectra features sequence that represents the phonetic information to synthesize. Correct spectral representation of speech is a major issue in speech synthesis. The prior art methods stem from two general approaches: concatenative synthesis and synthesis by rules. Concatenative synthesis is based on a proper representation, usually Linear Prediction Coding (LPC), of prerecorded segments of speech, that are stretched and adjoined together in order to construct the desired synthetic speech. Synthesis by rules, known also as formant synthesis, provides a spectral description of the steady states for each phoneme. Spectra between two adjacent phonemes are then interpolated on the basis of rules drawn by human phoneticians. The drawbacks of the prior art are that the first method requires a large set of segments (hundreds or more) that are to be extracted from natural speech and the second method requires a high degree of phonetic knowledge. The above requirements, together with the intrinsic complexity of rules, have limited the diffusion of synthesizers using the above methods. Furthermore, generally a text-to-speech synthesizer is strictly language dependent. In fact, phonetic rules vary from a language to another, as well as the speech segments to be used in concatenative synthesis, so that the complexity of customizing a synthesizer to another language is close to that of designing a completely new one. Object of the present invention is a new technique to synthesize speech from unrestricted text, based on a statistical approach, that does not require prerecorded segments or explicit rules. The present synthesizer is based on the interaction of two Hidden Markov Models and requires a phonetically aligned speech data base to train the models. It is an object of the present invention to provide a synthesizer system and a method for generating synthesized speech from unrestricted written text. The present invention requires a phonetic description of the language in which speech is to be synthesized, i.e. a catalog of the phomemes of that language. Procedures for building such a catalog are well known in the art. For that language it is also assumed the availability of a speech data base of preferably existing words which are phonetically aligned; this means that for each uttered word of the data base its phonetic transcription is available and for each phoneme of the words the rough starting and ending points are identified. A proper size of the data base is of about two thousands words, even if different sizes can be used as well. The synthesizer of the invention as claimed makes use of a prosodic processor and of two Hidden Markov Models. A prosodic processor converts the input string of text into a sequence of phonetic observations. Each observation string can be considered as the observations sequence of a Hidden Markov Model, from here on named Phonetic Ergodic Hidden Markov Model (PhEHMM). The hidden state sequence is then computed. To each state a set of speech features vectors is associated by the use of another Hidden Markov Model, from here on named Acoustic Ergodic Hidden Markov Model (AEHMM). A proper transformation of the speech features vectors is used by the synthesis filter to produce the synthetic speech output. The invention teaches the structure of the PhEHMM and the AEHMM, and the method of their training. The invention achieves the object of providing a method for constructing a speech synthesizer that is largely independent from the particular language in which speech is to be synthesized. Moreover, the preferred speech features vectors can be obtained by a fully automatic training with extremely reduced human knowledge and interaction. Fig. 1 shows a simplified drawing of the structure of the AEHMM. Fig. 2 shows a simplified drawing of the structure of the PhEHMM. Fig. 3 shows a block diagram of the text-to-speech synthesizer of the present invention. Fig. 4 shows the block diagram of the Phonetic Processor of Fig. 3. Fig. 5 reports a sample of the text processing performed by the Phonetic Processor. Fig. 6 shows an array of the labels and their probability for different observations. Fig. 7 shows the block diagram of a proposed implementation of the Labelling Unit of Fig. 3. Fig. 8 shows the block diagram of another proposed implementation of the Labelling Unit of Fig. 3. Fig. 9 shows the block diagram of the Spectral Sequence Production Unit used with the Labelling Unit of Fig. 7. Fig. 10 shows the block diagram of the Spectral Sequence Production Unit used with the Labelling Unit of Fig. 8. Fig. 11 shows the structure of the lattice Synthesis Filter used in the proposed implementation. A. Acoustic Ergodic Hidden Markov Model The synthesizer of the present invention is based on the interaction of two different Hidden Markov Models. The first one is the Acoustic Ergodic Hidden Markov Model (AEHMM), shown in Fig. 1. This figure shows a simplified scheme of the AEHMM, where q i , q j ....., represent the states of the model and a i,j represents the transition probability from state q i to state q j . Near each state q i a diagram represents the mean power density spectrum, computed from the expected value of the features vectors output probability density function. The AEHMM is a fully connected model, since it is possible to move from each state to any other state in one or more steps. It is assumed that the speech signal is represented by a multidimensional space of features. In the described implementation the space is continuous, as it is for the probability distributions. That means that each component of the speech features vectors and distribution values can assume real and continuous, not quantized, values. This approach presents some advantages; however a discrete approach is possible as well. Additional parameters, as voicing parameter or energy, may be embodied in the set of features or can be determined by external knowledge, according to the identity of the phoneme to be synthesized. Each state of the AEHMM can be considered as a local model, i.e. a source of features with a continuous density distribution probability to emit a speech features vector (that will also be referred as observation). In the proposed implementation, speech spectrum is represented by the first p + l lags of the autocorrelation function r(j), l≦j≦p, (p= number of autocorrelation lags) and by the Linear Prediction Gain σ. This means that the speech is modeled by an Autoregressive Process of order p. The speech is sampled at a proper frequency, for example at 10 kHz, and the resulting quantized speech signal is stored. The speech signal is then divided into slices of the same length, named frames; autocorrelation function and LPC are computed for each frame. A suitable value for p is 12, but other values can be used as well. The AEHMM is described by: Ω AEHMM ≡{ M , Q , Π, A , F } where M is the size of the model, i.e. the number of model's states, Q is the set of states, Π is the initial probability vector, A is the state transition matrix and F is a set of observation probability functions. The definition of each model's component follows. The observation probability functions F are continuous multivariate Gaussian distributions, giving for each state, the probability that a speech event, represented by the parametric vector O, is observed from that state, i.e.: 1 ≦ i ≦ M where and r α i (j) is the j-th lag of autocorrelation vector of state i, r t (j) is the j-th lag of autocorrelation vector of input speech frame. Moreover β i are the eigenvalues of state autocorrelation matrix and m vi , σ vi are the parameters defining the Gaussian voicing probability distribution for state i, which is supposed to be independent from the spectral density. N is a constant value generally proportional to the analysis frame length. This technique is discussed in prior art articles such as "On the Hidden Markov Model and Dynamic Time Warping for Speech Recognition-A Unified View", AT&T Bell Laboratories Technical Journal, Vol. 63, No. 7, Sept. 1984 by B.H. Juang and "On the Exact Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Gaussian Autoregressive Process", IEEE Transactions on Acoustic, Speech, and Signal Processing, Vol. 36, No. 6, June 1988 by B. Cernuschi-Frias and J.D. Rogers. Each state can be considered as a local autoregressive source of signal; the probability of observing a frame of speech of given autocorrelation is given by (A.2); these sources will be referred to as local sources in the following. The local sources are connected by a transition probability matrix, representing the phonotactical constrains of the speech. Given the set of M states Q≡ { q i }, the global model is completely defined by a set of initial probability values Π ≡ {π i = Prob ( q t =0 i )}, 1 ≦ i ≦ M representing the absolute probability of state q i at time t=0, and a transition probability matrix A ≡ {α i , j = Prob ( q t j / q t -1 i )}, 1 ≦ i , j ≦ M . which accounts for the inter-state transition rules, giving the probability of entering state q j at time t, conditioned on the previous state q i at time t-1. Descriptions of the AEHMM are reported in the article "A Finite States Markov Quantizer for Speech Coding", ICASSP Conference Proceedings, Albuquerque, USA, April 1990 by A. Falasch, M. Giustiniani and P. Pierucci and in the article "A Hidden Markov Model Approach to Speech Synthesis", Eurospeech Proceedings, Paris 1989 by A. Falaschi, M. Giustiniani, M. Verola. A Hidden Markov Model represents two stochastic processes, one that is directly observable and one that is hidden. In the AEHMM the observed process is the sequence of features extracted from speech, while the underlying hidden process is the sequence of local sources that most probably have generated the observed speech. This means that the AEHMM associates the features, computed from each speech signal frame, to the state, or set of states, and therefore the corresponding signal sources, that most probably have emitted that signal frame feature. Each source may be represented by a progressive number, named label; thus the total number of the labels is equal to the size of the AEHMM. This means that the AEHMM associates to each frame the label, or labels, of each of the sources that most probably has emitted the frame. This action will be referred as acoustic labelling. In order to build the model, some kind of distance or distortion measure is to be used. In the present embodiment, Likelihood Ratio distortion measure has been preferred, but other kind of measures may be used as well. No matter what kind of features representation is used, as far as they are useful to represent the spectrum of the signal, the basic point in the use of the AEHMM in the present invention is that of generating for a speech utterance, the sequence of sources, and hence of labels, that most probably have generated the observed speech utterance, where the probability is computed on the whole utterance and not only locally, as it happens usually by using standard vector quantizers. This means that the source identification is not made locally, but considering the whole evolution of the utterance and the phonotactical costrains that are embodied in the transition probability matrix. Initialization and Training of the AEHMM The AEHMM is initialized by any standard clustering algorithm applied to the same parametric representation of speech used in the AEHMM. In order to reduce the computational requirements of the re-estimation procedure, the model is preferably initialized by a Vector Quantization clustering scheme (VQ in the following), having the same size of the AEHMM and applied to a set of speech utterances emitted by the same speaker whose speech is used for the AEHMM re-estimation procedure. The Vector Quantization is known in prior art articles. Initial estimates for the state observation densities can be directly obtained by the speech features vectors of the Vector Quantizer codebook centroids, while the variance in the proposed features representation is the normalized LPC residual energy. Initial estimates of the state transition probability matrix can be obtained by using the set of VQ quantized speech utterances from the number of occurences of VQ label l i and VQ label l j in sequence, divided by the total number of observed couples starting with VQ label l i , i.e.: 1 ≦ i , j ≦ M where Coc( l t -1 i , l t j ) is the co-occurrence of VQ label l i at time t-1 followed by VQ label l j at time t in the training data. Initial estimates of initial probability vector (A.3) can be computed in the same way as the number of occurrences of VQ label l i divided by the total number of observed labels, that is: where Cnt(l i ) is the number of occurrences of VQ label l i in the training data. Training is then performed on a speech corpus by usual Forward Backward recursion and Baum-Welch re-estimation formulas. In order to reduce the training data size requirements, and to improve the overall estimation procedure, it is preferred that all the speech data can be uttered by the same speaker. Moreover it is preferable that the utterances be phonetically balanced, that is they should be representative of the phonetic events typical of the language and present the phoneme probability typical of the considered language. Use of the AEHMM The AEHMM is used to perform an acoustic labelling on a phonetically aligned speech data base; this means that, for each speech frame, there is the availability of a label indicating the selected state in the AEHMM, the speech features vectors associated to the local source corresponding to the selected label and the phonetic transcription, in a suitable phonetic alphabet, of the uttered phoneme from which the speech is extracted. It is preferable that the phonetically aligned speech data base and the training speech data base used to train the AEHMM be uttered by the same speaker. To train an M = 256 state model it is preferable to use a speech corpus having the size of two thousands phonetically aligned words or more. B. Phonetic Ergodic Hidden Markov Model Fig. 2 shows the second Hidden Markov Model used in the present invention, the Phonetic Ergodic Hidden Markov Model (PhEHMM). The PhEHMM is a model similar to the previously described AEHMM in that: it has the same size, i.e. the same number of states and it is initialized with the same transition probability among the states obtained by the transition probability matrix of the AEHMM. The observation probability functions of the PhEHMM are different from the ones of the AEHMM, in that to each state of the PhEHMM it is associated an observation probability function of emitting a phoneme of the adopted phonetic alphabet. The sequence of phonemes, each repeated a number of times proportional to their durations in the utterance to be synthesized, are called here synthetic observations. The role of the PhEHMM is hence that of establishing a correspondence between a string of synthetic observations and the sequence of the phonetic sources that most probably have emitted said synthetic observations. The PhEHMM is hence described by the following formula:  PhEHMM ≡{M, T, Θ, Z, Λ} where M is the size of the model, i.e. the same as for the AEHMM, T is the set of states, Θ is the initial probability vector, Z is the state transition probability matrix and Λ is a set of observation probability functions. The observation probability functions Λ of each state are discrete, giving for each state the probability that a phonetic symbol ψ i is observed from that state: Λ≡{λ i , j = Prob (ψ i /τ j )}, 1 ≦ i ≦ E , 1 ≦ j ≦ M . The observation probability functions are discrete because of the nature of phonetic symbols domain. E is the size of the adopted phonetic alphabet. Given a string of phonetic symbols, the PhEHMM is used to compute the most probable sequence of labels that constitutes the hidden state sequence, and therefore, using the AEHMM, the most probable sequence of spectral features corresponding to the phonetic symbols string. Fig. 2 shows a simplified scheme of the PhEHMM, where τ i , τ j , τ k ....., represent the states of the model, z i,j represents the transition probability from state τ i to state τ j . Near each state a diagram represents the discrete density probability of emitting each phoneme of the adopted phonetic alphabet. Initialization and Training of the PhEHMM The PhEHMM is initialized using the same speech corpus, acoustically and phonetically labelled, previously defined in connection with the AEHMM. Initial estimates for the initial probability vector and transition probability matrix can be obtained by the corresponding stochastic descriptions of the AEHMM, considering as transition probability matrix Z the same transition probability matrix A of the AEHMM. The same is done for the initial probability vector Θ. Θ⁰≡Π , Z⁰≡ A The observation distribution function of each state is initialized via the following procedure. The previously defined speech corpus is acoustically labelled using the AEHMM, obtaining the AEHMM state sequence: S τ ≡{τ⁰, τ¹, .., τ T } A phonetic transcription of the same speech corpus is obtained using a suitable method, obtaining a sequence of phonetic symbols: S ψ ≡{ψ ϑ , ψ¹, .., ψ T } The initial estimate of the observation probability function for each state can now be obtained using: 1 ≦ i ≦ E , 1 ≦ j ≦ M giving for each state the probability that a phonetic symbol ψ i , is observed from that state. In this expression Cnt (ψ i , τ j ) is the number of joint observed occurrences of phonetic symbol ψ i and state τ j . The PhEHMM is then iteratively re-estimated by well-known Baum-Welch algorithm on a suitable phonetically transcribed text corpus. C. Description of the synthesizer system Fig. 3 illustrates the block diagram of Text-to-speech Synthesizer 30. In the diagram only the structures involved in the present invention are fully explained, while the components necessary to the speech synthesis, but which are standard in the art, are only briefly described. Synthesizer 30 includes Text Input Unit 31, Phonetic Processor 32, Prosodic Processor 34, Labelling Unit 33, Spectra Sequence Production Unit 35 and Synthesis Filter 36. Text Input Unit 31 provides the text input interface and the processing needed to divide the input text into sentences for the following processing. Phonetic Processor 32 is depicted in more details in Fig. 4. With reference to Fig. 4, Syllabificator 41 is a syllabification unit, having the purpose of dividing input text into syllables for the next process; Phonetic Transcriber 42 converts input graphemes into the corresponding phonemes. A phonetic alphabet of 29 symbols was used in the proposed embodiment, as that reported in table 1. However other phonetic alphabets, also more detailed, can be used if desired. Microprosody Processor 43 computes the overall duration for each phoneme to be synthesized. It makes use of a syllable model and morphosyntactical information in order to produce the desired output. It is based on a concept of intrinsic duration of the phoneme. Each phoneme is considered differently according to its position in the syllables and respect to the lexical stress. To each different phoneme position a different duration value, stored in Duration Data Base 44, is associated. Syllable models of this kind have been proposed in literature. Intrinsic durations are then stretched accordingly to the part-of-speech of the word in the sentence. Algorithms to modify durations accordingly to the part-of-speech are reported in prior art. Synthetic Observations Generator 45 has the role of converting the sequence of phonemes and corresponding overall durations into a string of PhEHMM synthetic observations; it produces a string of phonemes, where each phoneme is repeated as many times as the number of frames corresponding to its overall computed duration. Referring to Fig. 5, a sample of the input string text is reported in Fig. 5.A where the Italian sentence "Questo è un esempio di frase" is used as an example of text to be synthesized. Fig. 5.B reports the phonetic transcription of the sentence used in that example. In Fig. 5.C the sequence of words and the corresponding part-of-speech are reported. Fig. 5.D shows each phoneme repeated as many times as the number of frames corresponding to its overall computed duration. Labelling Unit (LU) 33 of Fig. 3 has the purpose of computing the most probable state sequence, corresponding to synthetic observations sequence. Labelling Unit 33 is shown in two different implementations, LU 70 and LU 80 in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8 respectively. Labelling Unit 70 of Fig. 7 computes from the synthetic observations sequence, as the one reported in Fig. 5.D, the underlying sequence of states of the PhEHMM. Baum-Welch PhEHMM Processor 71 performs the well-known Baum-Welch algorithm. Processor 71 has the purpose of generating for each observed phoneme the probability vector of each state which caused that phonetic symbol observation, as reported in Fig. 6. Each element in the array of Fig. 6 is composed of the couple: label (L1, L2, L3....), label probability (P(1), P(2), P(3)...) for each observation, where an observation is, as specified above, a phonetic symbol of the synthetic observations sequence and for each column of the table, LBL represents the label of the state of the PhEHMM, and Prob is the probability of the label to have generated the observation. Fig. 8 shows the second implementation of Labelling Unit (LU) 33 of Fig. 3 as LU 80. It computes from the synthetic observations sequence the best sequence of the states of the PhEHMM using any optimality criterion. Only one state (i.e. one label) is associated to each item of the synthetic sequence observations. As an example, the state sequence can be computed by the well-known Viterbi algorithm performed by Viterbi PhEHMM Processor 81 on the whole synthetic observations sequence. The Spectra Sequence Production Unit (SSPU) of Fig. 3 has the purpose of converting the input labels sequence, as generated by Labelling Unit 70 or 80, into a sequence of filter coefficients. Fig. 9 and 10 show the structure of SSPU 90 and 100 corresponding to the two implementations of Labelling Unit 70 and 80 respectively. SSPU 90 is composed by Speech Features Codebook (SFC) 92 and the Features Interpolator (FI) 91. SFC 92 associates to each label the corresponding source model of the AEHMM, as determined by the previous AEHMM training. This means that in the present embodiment the vector of expected values of the source parameters is associated to each label produced by Labelling Unit 70. This is immediate using multivariate Gaussian distributions. In such case the mean value of the Gaussian density distribution itself is associated to each label. FI 91 provides the computing to generate the actual features vector to be used in the synthesis filter. In this purpose, it computes a weighted mean of the speech features vectors of the AEHMM codebook. It is of course desirable that the features be linear with respect to the interpolation scheme. When prediction coefficients are used, it is preferable to transform them into more linear features as, for instance, Log Area Ratios. The features vectors transformation operation is indicated by Γ(r i ), and gives a different set of features vectors u i : U ≡{ u i =Γ( r i )}, 1 ≦ i ≦ M The output features vector, for each frame to be synthesized, is then computed by weighting each features vector of the codebook by the probability of the corresponding label at time t, as here reported: where prob(τ i t ) are the probabilities of each state as computed by Labelling Unit 70, and u i are the transformation of the associated features vectors of the codebook, and u t / av is the resulting features vector to be sent to the synthesis filter. The result is then back converted into a spectral representation suitable for the synthesis process. In the proposed implementation, reflection coefficients k are used, back transformed as in (C.3). K ≡{ k i =Δ( u i )}, 1 ≦ i ≦ M where Δ is the back transformation operator. SSPU 100 suitable for LU 80 is shown in Fig. 10 and is composed by Spectral Features Codebook 102 and Features Selector 101. In this implementation, Features Selector 101 associates to each label the corresponding speech features vectors of the AEHMM, stored in Speech Features Vectors Codebook 102, selected accordingly to the optimum algorithm. Resulting speech features vectors are then transformed into filter coefficients to be used by Synthesis Filter 36. When the reflection coefficients k are used, the synthesis filter assumes the structure shown in Fig. 11. In Fig. 11 gain values are provided by the energy contour, computed by Prosody Processor 34. Other procedures to compute energy may be used as well. The excitation sources, Glottal Pulses Generator and Noise Generator, in Fig. 11 are controlled by the voicing parameter. Voicing can be computed in different ways: if it is imbedded in the spectral features set, it is processed in the same way as the other features. A threshold decision may be used in order to classify the speech frame as voiced or unvoiced, or mixed excitations may be used as well. Otherwise, voicing parameter should be associated to each phoneme to be synthesized, and changed in the synthesis process accordingly to the actually synthesized phoneme. D. Operation of the Synthesizer Once the two hidden Markov models, AEHMM and PhEHMM, have been built as described in Section A and B, the whole text-to-speech synthesis process can be summarized as follows: The written text is inputted through Text Input 31 and then converted into a phonetic transcription by Phonetic Processor 32, which determines also the additional parameters that may be used in Synthesis Filter 36. Microprosody Processor 43 computes the overall duration for each phoneme. A different duration is assigned to each phoneme by Duration Data Base 44. The phoneme sequence and the durations associated to each phoneme are processed by Synthetic Observations Generator 45, which produces the synthetic observations sequence, a sample of which is shown in Fig. 5.D. The synthetic observations sequence is then processed by Labelling Unit 33, which computes, according to a selected optimality criterion, the labels sequence, i.e. the sequence of states of the PhEHMM, corresponding to the said synthetic observations sequence. Spectra Sequence Production Unit 35 accepts as input the labels sequence and associates to the labels the speech features vectors of the corresponding AEHMM. The resulting speech features vectors are then transformed into filter coefficients. These coefficients, together with the prosodic and additional parameters generated by Prosodic Processor 34, are then used by Synthesis Filter 36 to produce the synthetic speech output.

Claims: A method for generating synthesized speech wherein an acoustic ergodic hidden Markov model (AEHMM), reflecting phonotactical constrains is correlated to a phonetic ergodic hidden Markov model (PhEHMM), the method comprising the steps of a) Building an AEHMM, considering as observations sequence the speech features vectors extracted from the frames in which the speech uttered during the training of said AEHMM is divided and as hidden sequence the sequence of the sources that most probably have emitted the speech utterance frames, b) Initializing said AEHMM by a Vector Quantization clustering scheme, having the same size of said AEHMM, c) Training said AEHMM by the Forward-Backward algorithm and Baum-Welch re-estimation formulas, d) Associating to each frame the label of the most probable source, e) Building a PhEHMM of the same size of said AEHMM, considering as observations sequence a synthetic observations sequence obtained from a written text and as hidden sequence the sequence of the labels, f) Initializing said PhEHMM transition probability matrix by assigning to the state transition probabilities the same values of the transition probabilities of the corresponding states of said AEHMM, g) Initializing said PhEHMM observation probability functions by: i) using a phonetically aligned speech corpus ii) generating for said speech corpus the sequence of the most probable labels, using the acoustic labelling feature of said AEHMM, iii) computing the observations probability function for each phoneme, counting the number of occurrences of the phoneme in a state divided by the total number of phonemes emitted by said state, h) Training said PhEHMM by the Baum-Welch algorithm on a proper synthetic observations corpus, i) Determining for each word to be synthesized a synthetic observation and through said PhEHMM the corresponding sequence of labels by means of a proper optimality criterion, j) Determining from the input text a set of additional parameters, as energy, prosody contours and voicing, by a prosodic processor, k) Determining for said sequence of labels the corresponding set of speech features vectors through said AEHMM, l) Transforming said speech features vectors into a set of filter coefficients preserving the spectral information and m) Using said set of filter coefficients and said additional parameters in a synthesis filter to produce a synthetic speech output. A method for generating speech from unrestricted written text according to claim 1, wherein the proper optimality criterion of step i) is given by the Baum-Welch algorithm and wherein the determination of the speech features vectors of step k) is obtained by weighting each features vector by the probability of the corresponding labels. A method for generating speech from unrestricted written text according to claim 1, wherein the proper optimality criterion of step i) is given by the Viterbi algorithm and wherein the determination of the speech features vectors of step k) is obtained by associating to each label the corresponding speech features vector of said AEHMM. A text-to-speech synthesizer system including a text input device (31) for entering the text to be synthesized, a phonetic processor (32) for converting the grapheme input into a phonetic representation and for determining the phonetic duration parameters, a prosodic processor (34) for determining prosodic and energy contours for the speech utterance to be synthesized and a synthesis filter (36) which, using said prosodic and energy contours and filter coefficients, synthesizes the speech to be generated characterized in that it comprises said phonetic processor (32) including a Synthetic Observations Generator (45) which translates said phonetic representation of the input text into a string of phonetic symbols, each repeated to properly reflect the phoneme duration as computed by said prosodic processor (34) and generating a Phonetic Ergodic Hidden Markov Model (PhEHMM) observations sequence; a Labelling Unit (33) associating to each observation of said observations sequence the probability that said state has generated said observation by an optimality criterion and a Spectra Sequence Production Unit (35) computing for each speech frame to be synthesized the speech features vector by a correlation between labels and speech features vectors, computed by an Acoustic Ergodic Hidden Markov Model (AEHMM), built on previously uttered speech corpus, said Spectra Sequence Production Unit (35) converting by a back transformation the speech features vectors into filter coefficients to be used by said synthesis filter (36). A text-to-speech synthesizer system of claim 4 in which the optimality criterion used in said Labelling Unit (33) consists of computing the probability that each state have generated a given observation by the Baum-Welch algorithm and in which each speech features vector is computed as a sum of the speech features vectors, associated to each label by said AEHMM, weighted by the probability of each label, computed by said Labelling Unit (33). A text-to-speech synthesizer system of claim 4 wherein the optimality criterion used in said Labelling Unit (33) consists of computing the sequence of the states that most probably have generated the observed synthetic observations sequence as obtained by the Viterbi algorithm and wherein each speech features vector is obtained by associating to each label the corresponding source model of said AEHMM and assuming as speech features vector the mean vector associated to the source model.

Inventors: GIUSTINIANI MASSIMO, PIERUCCI PIERO, GIUSTINIANI, MASSIMO, PIERUCCI, PIERO
Applicants: IBM, IBM SEMEA, IBM SEMEA S.R.L., INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Application year: 1990
Main classification: G10L5
IPC codes: G10L13, G01L3, G10L19, G10L15