METAL OXIMATE POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS CHEMICAL DECONTAMINANT SYSTEM

Abstract: A cream or lotion comprising an alkali metal salt of certain oximes, phenols or polyethylene glycol monoethers, dispersed in a substantially anhydrous state in a base medium comprising a polyethylene glycol and/or a polyethylene glycol ether. For low-temperature applications, up to about 10 w/w % of water may be included in the base medium. These creams or lotions are effective against chemical warfare agents of both the V and G types, and against mustard gas (H or HD), and are simpler to make than known potassium salt-containing creams, for example those containing a macrocyclic ether and/or inert thickener and potassium phenate. These creams or lotions may be used both for protection and decontamination, and some may be used as personal barrier creams.

Description: METAL OXIMATE POLYETHYLENE GLYOOLS CHEMICAL DECCTΑMINANT SYSTEM This invention relates to a decontaminant cream or lotion formulation which can be used to remove chemical warfare agents from exposed areas. Certain of these creams can also be used as protective barrier creams on exposed areas, including barrier creams for personal use. The types of chemical warfare agents which are considered to constitute a major threat are those conrøDnly designated as HD, V and G. The first of these, HD, is an acronym for mustard gas, the 'D' implying that it is distilled. The formula for this compound is C1CH 2 CH 2 -S-CH2 H2C1. It belongs to the vesicant class of chemical warfare agents. V and G stand for V- and G- series of nerve agents. The G-series tend to be volatile and highly toxic by inhalation, whilst the V-agents are relatively non-volatile, persistent, and highly toxic by the percutaneous route. Typical examples of these series are GD and VX which have the following formulae: 0 GD O CH g GH g 0 CH C CH 3 CH 3 (1,2,2-trimethyl)propyl rosthylphosphonofluoridate SUBSTITUTE SHEET O-ethyl S-2-diisopropylaminoethyl metlwlphosphonothiolate To be of practical use under field conditions, any cream or lotion which is to be used either for decontamination or as a cream providing protection against chemical warfare agents has to possess certain desirable properties. First, it roust be effective against all three of these types of chemical warfare agents. Second, for use as a barrier cream it must be compatible with human skin and not cause any adverse reactions, at least over a limited period of time. Third, it must provide protection for a reasonable period of time. In this context it is to be noted that "decontamination" includes both coating before exposure to negate effects, and cleaning after exposure to remove potentially lethal deposits. These three criteria effectively exclude many of the currently known decontamination systems which have been devised as a means of destroying chemical warfare agents either for use as barrier creams, or to decontaπiinate relatively sensitive substances such as fabrics and the like. The chief difficulty is that such decontamination systems contain very powerful reagents which often will damage the surface being treated. Some of these systems are very- alkaline, and some use concentrated active chlorine or bleach solutions. Thus, although these systems are, more or less, efficacious as decontaminants for equipment which has been exposed to chemical warfare agents, they are of SUBSTITUTE SHEET no use in protecting or decon-tøminating people, and give no guide at all as to the sort of systems that might be used to formulate protective systems. One solution to the barrier cream problem has been proposed which permits the formulation of a cream which is effective against all three types of agents, causes minimal adverse skin reactions during the periods of time for which such a barrier cream is likely to be worn, and also provides the wearer with protection for a reasonable period of time. Although these proposed creams contain a reagent that is potentially extremely basic, for example, potassium phenoxide, they do appear to be compatible with skin. In detail, these proposed creams provide a barrier cream consisting essentially of at least one active ingredient chosen from the alkali metal salts of mono- and dihydroxy phenols, and alkyl and mono alkoxy substituted mono and dihydroxy phenols, in which the alkyl groups each contain from 1 to 4 carbon atoms, dispersed in a substantially anhydrous state in a base medium comprising a polyethylene glycol which has optionally been partially etherified to reduce the free hydroxyl group content. In these creams the preferred active ingredient is potassium phenoxide. Similar creams have also been proposed in which the active ingredient is chosen from an alkali metal, preferably potassium, salt of phenol, acetophenone oxime, acetone oxime and 2,3-butanedione monoxime, together with a similar polyethylene glycol base, which also includes a macrocycle chosen from the compounds known as 18-crown-6 and cryptand[2,2,2], and a small amount of water. SUBSTITUTE SHEET Whilst these creams have been found to be effective, in that they meet the three main properties enumerated above reasonably efficiently, they are not without certain disadvantages, for example the macrocycles used are expensive. These creams contain essentially three components: the reactive substance, which destroys the chemical warfare agent, a macrocycle and the base in which they are dispersed. To prepare these creams, the reactive substance, for example potassium phenoxide and macrocycle have to be prepared first, and then added to the base. These substances are both difficult to prepare and difficult to handle since they are particularly sensitive to reaction with water. An advantage would be gained, therefore, if the preparation of these creams could be simplified. We have now discovered that such a cream or lotion can be prepared both simply and easily, by dispersing the active ingredient (the alkali metal salt, for example the potassium salt) directly into the same sort of polyethylene glycol ether as is used to provide the major part of the cream base in the creams proposed above. In one particular, and special, case, the active substance can be prepared directly in the polyethylene glycol base, by reacting a suitable polyethylene glycol with an alkali metal, especially potassium. According to the present invention, a composition in the form of a cream or lotion comprises an alkali metal salt of acetophenone oxime, of 2,3-butanedione monoxime, or of a polyethylene glycol monoether; dispersed in a substantially anhydrous state in a base medium comprising a polyethylene glycol and/or a polyethylene glycol ether; SUBSTITUTE SHEET provided that the composition does not comprise an alkali metal salt of polyethylene glycol monoether and an alkali metal salt of a phenol carrying one or two hydroxy groups and, optionally, one or more C j ^ alkyl and/or one or more C-._ 4 alkoxy groups. Preferably, the polyethylene glycol ether has the general formula R 1 0 CH 2 CH 2 0) n -CH2-CH 2 -OR 2 in which R 1 and R 2 each independently represent hydrogen or an alkyl group, and n is an integer of at least 1. The potassium salts used in these creams generally are prepared separately, in a relatively pure state. Whilst separate preparation of the salt has the advantage that the salt can then be identified and, if desired, purified, it has the disadvantage mentioned above for the creams containing, for example, potassium phenate, that these salts require careful handling in dry conditions. In one particular instance what may be called a "one-pot" technique may be used whereby the salt is prepared in situ directly. This method is particularly advantageous since it both minimizes the handling of sensitive compounds, and simplifies cream or lotion preparation. It is somewhat surprising that these salts can be prepared by direct reaction of the alkali metal with a monoroethyl polyethylene glycol. Other workers have suggested that alkoxides cannot be prepared directly from polyethylene glycols and alkali metals, and recommended the use of an intermediate, for example sodium naphthide. It has been reported, however, that sodium metal will react with a polyethylene glycol having a molecular weight of about 4000. Our investigations show that an alkali metal salt is being prepared, for example we have isolated and characterized (by means of elemental analysis, IR and SUBSTITUTE SHEET NMR investigations) the potassium salt of diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, CH 3 -0—CH 2 CH2-O-CH 2 CH2-OK. When the one-pot method is used, the choice of polyethylene glycol both as reactant and as cream or lotion base - which is also present - is quite broad, and is generally similar to those used directly as a cream or lotion base. The polyethylene glycol used as the reactant generally will have the formula R 3 C CH2CH2θ7-τ a CH 2 CH 2 OH, in which R 3 is an alkyl group, usually of 1-4 carbon atoms, and especially methyl or ethyl. The value of m can be quite broad, ranging from 1 (i.e. , a diethylene glycol msno-ether) up to at least about 50, to give a polyethylene glycol with a irølecular weight of about 1900. It is also contemplated to use a mixture of polyethylene glycol ethers, for example, both to give a reasonable reaction rate and a reasonable cream or lotion consistency. Alternatively, the alkali metal salt can be prepared directly in a mixture of a polyethylene glycol monoether in a diether, for example a πjixture of diethylene glycol monomethyl ether in "tetraglyme", which has the formula CH 3 -0-^CH 2 CH 2 03--^CH 2 CH2θCH 3 . In selecting the blend of polyethylene glycols and ethers to be used in the creams and lotions of this invention, apart from ensuring that there is enough hydroxyl group content to provide an adequate concentration of alkali metal salt (it is to be remembered that for the mono-ethers as the molecular weight increases, hydroxyl content decreases) two factors have to be balanced. Ideally, the final cream or lotion should be free of any excess of hydroxyl groups in order to be able to utilize fully the destructive powers against the chemical warfare agents of the active alkali metal salts. SUBSTITUTE SHEET Tliis suggests that the base material should be diethers. Experience shows, however, that the salts are not too soluble in such systems, and hence generally a mix of diether and some mono-ether is required in order to achieve a balance of properties. In those applications in which maximum capacity for dissolution of active ingredient is desirable and the rate of destruction is not as critical, use of non-etherified polyethylene glycols may be warranted. The base medium used in these creams and lotions can be chosen from a wide range of compounds, and indeed need not be a single compound at all. The chief requirement is that it provide an adequate ci'eam or lotion consistency. The polyethylene glycols being considered here have the general formula R 1 0(CH 2 CH 2 0) n -CH 2 -CH 2 -OR 2 in which both R 1 and R 2 , are hydrogen. For the creams and lotions of this invention intended for use on skin, the hydroxyl groups need to be etherified, at least in part. Thus, for skin application generally at least one of R 1 and R 2 will not be hydrogen. Suitable etherifying groups are alkyl groups of up to 4 carbon atoms. Typically the etherifying groups will be methyl or ethyl groups. It is thus apparent that a suitable base medium can be obtained either by etherifying a mixture of polyethylene glycols, mixing pre-etherified polyethylene glycols, or by luixing together a fully etherified polyethylene glycol with a suitable amount of a second unetherified or mono- etherified polyethylene glycol, which may be a polyethylene glycol of different chain length to the etherified one. For applications other than to skin, the polyethylene glycols being considered for creams or lotions of this invention have the general formula SUBSTITUTE SHEET R 1 0(CH 2 CH20) n -CH 2 -CH 2 -0R 2 , in which R 1 and R 2 may each be hydrogen or an alkyl group of 1 to 4 carbon atoms. Tle particular formulation of base medium will be dictated by the specific applications. The value of n in the above formulae can be chosen from a wide range. If n is high enough, for example, to give a molecular weight above 750 or so, then the polyethylene glycol ether will itself provide the required consistency for the cream or lotion. Alternatively, if n is small, for example, the compound CH 3 CKCH 2 CH 2 0 — 3 CH 2 CH 2 -0CH 3 known as "tetra lyme ,, , then the polyethylene glycol either is a liquid and cannot provide a cream by itself. It may be thickened by adding to it any of the substances commonly used in pharmaceutical creams for this purpose, such as silicas, titania, Fuller's earth, clays, bentonite, and so forth. The filler used also has to be one which will not react with the active ingredient. Thus an "active" silica may need to be etherified before use. For low-temperature applications it is recognized that requirements for sub-zero temperature use could not be satisfactorily met with the completely anhydrous formulation, since it begins to form a slush. At that point in time, up to about 10 w/w % of water may be added to the base medium to lower the slush point. Subsequent in-vitro testing indicated that the formulation was still effective and tended to spread easier. The creams and lotions of this invention also proffer a further unexpected advantage. It was noted above that the equipment decontamination systems commonly used cannot be used on skin due to their chemical nature. This also means that such systems tend to be of questionable use for porous equipment SUBSTITUTE SHEET surfaces such as fabrics and webbing. If these chemical solutions are left in contact with such porous materials long enough to penetrate them adequately, then they are also likely to damage the materials as well. This appears not to be the case with certain of the creams of this invention, particularly those incorporating phenoxide and oximate salts, which can be left in contact with porous contaminated surfaces for extended periods of time without any damage resulting. It is noted above that certain creams of this invention which again contain phenoxide and certain oximate salts do not affect the skin. Example 1 Preparation of the Potassium Salt of Diethylene Glvcol Monomethyl Ether Method I Metallic potassium ( — 2.5g, 6.4 x 10 "2 gram atom, accurately weighed) was placed in a nitrogen-flushed 2L round-bottom, three-neck flask containing 150 mL of hexane (sodium dried) and equipped with a magnetic stirring bar. The flask was also fitted with a condenser, nitrogen inlet tube and pressure-equalizing dropping funnel, each separated from the flask by a large-bore stopcock which allowed for isolation of the flask and reaction product from the remainder of the apparatus. The apparatus was protected from moisture and carbon dioxide and fitted with an exit bubbler to monitor the nitrogen flow (250 mL per minute) . A solution containing a ten percent excess (8.46g, 7.04 x 10 "2 mole) of diethylene glycol monomethyl ether (2-glycol MME, dried over activated molecular sieves) in 2 mL of cyclohexane (sodium dried) had been placed in the dropping funnel (in a dry lab, argon atmosphere) prior to assembly the apparatus. SUBSTITUTE SHEET The potassium-hexane mixture was heated with stirring under reflux to disperse the potassium. The 2-glycol MME-cyclohexane solution was then added dropwise over approximately fifty minutes. The reaction was continued under reflux for six to seven hours, after which heat was removed while the nitrogen flow was maintained to avoid intake of air. The cooled flask containing the product was isolated from the rest of the apparatus via the stopcocks and transferred to a dry-lab for workup. The precipitate which separated on cooling was collected and washed with hexane (sodium dried) followed by ether (sodium dried) and provided the potassium salt of 2-glycol MME as colorless crystals. Yield 6.98g, 69%, m.p. 89-91"C. Anal. Calcd. for C 5 H X1 0 3 K. C, 37.95; H, 7.01; K, 24.71. Found: C, 37.70, 37.67; H, 7.03, 6.99; K, 24.45, 24.56%. Method II Method I was modi ied by substituting tetraetbylene glycol dimethyl ether (chrcimatographed through both basic and acidic alumina, dried over molecular sieves), 50 mL for the hexane. The reaction was conducted using 0.387g (9.9 x 10~ 3 gram atom) of potassium and 1.82g (1.5 x 10 "2 mole) of 2-glycol MME (50% excess) at 65-70 * C. The 2-glycol MME was added dropwise in tetraglyme (20 mL) over 15 minutes and heating was continued for three hours. Potassium-2- Lycol MME was not isolated but was made up to 0.1M concentration with tetraglyme and screened for reactivity against HD, GD and VX. See Table IV for results. Carbon-13 NMR and proton NMR spectra of K-2-glycol MME were recorded on a Varian XL-200 FT NMR Spectrometer using a solution containing 0.03 g of salt in 0.5 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide-d 6 (EMS0-d 6 ), unless SUBSTITUTE SHEET otherwise stated. Infrared spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Infrared Spectrophoto eter Model 283. Example 2 Potassium Salt of Polyethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether, Molecular Weight 35Q (PEGMME 35Q) The preparation was performed in a dry-lab in an argon atmosphere. Potassium (0.0979g, 2.5 x 10 "3 gram atom) and PEGMME 350 (dried over molecular sieves), 12 mL, were placed in a 25 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer and heated at 65-70"C for four hours. The product, (potassium-PEGMME 350) was not isolated but was made up to known concentration (0.5 or 0.1M) with PEGMME 350 and examined for reactivity vs VX. For comparison, the salt isolated from Method I above was also made up to 0.1M in PEC31ME 350 and tested against VX. See Table V for results. Example 3 Potassium Salt of a Barrier (Trptam Base The preparation was performed in a dry-lab in an argon atmosphere. Sixty mL of a base cream (50% PEGMME 550 and 50% PEGMME 1900, W:W%) roslt which had been dried at 10~ 3 Torr for 3h and potassium (1.12g, 0.029 gram atom) were placed in a 200 niL round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer and heated at 65-70"C for four hours and forty minutes. The resulting solution, when cooled, produced a homogeneous cream with excellent texture and spreading qualities. SUBSTITUTE SHEET Example 4 Sπrftft ing: Decontaminants vs CW Agents The CW agent solutions were prepared by weighing 0.4 milliequivalents (i.e. HD, 31.8 mg; VX, 106.8 mg; GD, 72.8 mg) of a given agent into 1 mL volumetric flasks and making up to volume with the same solvent in which the candidate decontaminant salt was dissolved (See Tables I, IV, V). For screening, an aliquot (25 μL) of the agent solution was transferred via a microlitre syringe to a 3 mL Reacti-Vial* (Pierce Chemical Co.) equipped with a teflon-lined silicone rubber septum and a triangular magnetic stirrer. The candidate decontaminant solution (400 μL) was added to tie Reacti-Vial via a microlitre syringe and the resultant solution was stirred at 19-22 * . The ratio of salt:agent was adjusted by altering the concentration of the salt solution. See Tables IV and V for these ratios, salt concentrations, solvents used and reaction times. At the end of the selected reaction tiroes the systems were quenched with a twenty-five-fold excess (relative to the nucleophile salt) of glacial acetic acid. The extend of decontamination achieved was obtained from agent destruction as determined by gas chromatographic analysis using an external agent standard. The standard was prepared in the same solvent as that used in the decontamination experiment at a concentration equal to that initially present in the reaction mixture. Injections (1 μL) of the standard were made before and after those from the decontamination experiments and by comparison of the peak areas the amount of agent destruction was calculated. * Trade Mark SUBSTITUTE SHEET A Perkin-Elmer gas chromatograph (GC) Model Sigma IB, equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) and dedicated computer, complete with recorder, for data manipulation was used for all GC analysis. The TCD and injection port were maintained at 250 * and 240 * respectively. Tlie injection sample size was 1 μL. The instrument was fitted with a 10 ft x 2mm I.D. column and a 6 in. precolumn, both constructed of silanized glass and both packed with 10% ϋCW-98 on Gas Chrom Q*, 80/100 mesh. All other GC parameters are shown in Table I. Example 5 Cream Preparations Tlie selected active ingredient salt is weighed (taking suitable precautions: i.e. , in a dry box and in an inert atnosphere) into an appropriately sized jar- fitted with a polytetra fluor-oetbylene lined cap. The weighed salt, in its jar, the base cream and a large syringe are then equilibrated in an oven at 55"C, in order primarily to render the cream adequately fluid. The required amount of cream is then transferred to the jar which is then stirred to disperse the salt evenly into the liquified cream. This can require several hours stirring (for example with a magnetic stirrer using a small bar in the jar) at a temperature in the 50 * -60"C range. Thereafter the creams are allowed to cool, stirred to a smooth texture with a spatula, and transferred to suitable sealed containers in a dry box. The following creams were prepared by this route, using the following four base creams (it is to be noted that the numbers following PEG indicate an approximate * Trade Mark SUBSTITUTE SHEET average molecular weight: e.g. , PEG 350 is a polyethylene glycol which has an approximate molecular weight of 350; percentages are given by weight) . Base Cream: 350 roonoro≥thylether 1900 monoroethylether 550 monomethylether 1900 irøncmethylether 600 1900 roDncroethylether 550 monomethylether 1900 monomethylether Using these bases, creams were prepared containing potassium phenoxide, potassium 2,3-butanedione πβnoximate, potassium acetophenone oximate, and potassium acetone oximate at a concentration of 1.25 molar. In each case, for bases 1 and 2 at least about 75% of the salt appears to dissolve, the remainder being finely dispersed. Using base 3, the salt appears to dissolve completely. Base 4 was used only with potassium acetophenone oximate, which appear to be soluble in this base. Example 6 Cream Evaluation Test S p ecies - Albino male guinea pigs (approx 500 g), virus-free Hartley strain, were obtained and were acclimatized for at least one week before use. Challen g e Procedure - An area 80 cm 2 on the back of each animal was shaved and treated with hair remover to provide a depilated test surface. The following roorning, the animals were weighed and placed on a restraining tray which permitted bead movement and eating from the front of the tray but did not permit sufficient torso movement to endanger the test area on the back. A 3 x 4 cm area was SUBSTITUTE SHEET marked on the depilated back skin and a measured volume of cream, 0.8 mL, was spread evenly over the marked zone. This produced a layer 0.5 - 0.6 ran thick. One hour following application of the cream, droplets of chemical warfare agent were applied to the surface of the cream at separated locations until the total dose desired had been administered. The restrained animals were placed in a fume hood facing the air flow to minimize the possibility of inhaling the agent vapour. After 6h they were freed, transferred to small individual wire cages and kept overnight. Fresh lettuce and carrots were provided during the period of restraint and food and water were provided to the caged animals. All animals were examined regularly during the restraint period for clinical signs. If death occurred, the time of death was recorded. Twenty-four hours following application of the agent, the cream was carefully washed from backs of the surviving animals and the area of application was examined for skin damage. Surviving animals were examined for other physiological abnormalities and euthanized with carbon dioxide. If abnormal tissues were found at necropsy, samples were collected for biological examination. Each group of experimental animals included at least 2 which were treated with agent in the absence of cream (agent controls). At least 4 were treated with agent following the application of base cream containing no active ingredient (cream control). At least 10 were treated with agent following the application of active cream. With nerve agents, group statistics generated included average time of death, percent survival, body weight, does of agent and tissue examination data. SUBSTITUTE SHEET With mustard (HD) a modified Braize scoring system was used similar to that described elsewhere, but was expressed as percent protection provided by base or active cream in relation to the skin damage caused to untreated controls. Doses of Agent Applied 1. Mustard (HD): 0.4, 0.8, 1.2 and 1.6 μL/12 cm 2 2. GD in 4 μL and fraction thereof droplet size (a) Barrier cream: 16 LD 50 (b) Base cream * . 8 LD 50 3. VX in 4 μL and fraction thereof droplet size (a) Barrier cream: 68 LD 50 (b) Base cream: 34 LD 50 Active Ingredients 1. Potassium phenoxide (KOFh) 2. Potassium 2,3 butanedione roonoxiroate (KDAMO) 3. Potassium acetophenone oximate (KOMP) Cream Formulations These were prepared as described in Example 5. For convenience in tabulation of results and in discussion the following designations are used. MG1 - Base Cream 1. MG2 - Base Cream 2. MG3 - Base Cream 3. MG4 - Base Cream 4. PMG1 (1.25m KOPh) - 1.25 molal KOPh, in Base Cream #1 PMG2 (1.25m KOPh) - 1.25 molal KOPh, in Base Cream #2 PMG3 (1.25ro KOPh) - 1.25 molal KOPh, in Base Cream #3 PMG2 (1.25m KOPh) - 1.0 molal KOPh, in Base Cream #2 PMG2 (1.25m KOPh) - 1.5 molal KOPh, In Base Cream #2 PMG2 (1.25m KOPh) - 2.0 molal KOPh, in Base Cream #2 OMG2 (1.25m KDAMO) - 1.25 molal KDAMO, in Base Cream #2 0MG2 (1.25m KOMP) - 1.25 molal KOMP, in Base Cream #2 0MG4 (1.25m KOMP) - 1.25 molal KOMP, in Base Cream #4 SUBSTITUTE SHEET A subjective assessment was made of the cosmetic characteristics (appearance, color, spreading and integrity), of the creams and of their irritancy to both skin and eyes. Example 7 Low Temperature Applications The addition of 10 w/w % water to 1.25 molal potassium, 2,3-butanedione roonoximate (KBDO) in polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether, molecular weight 550 daltons (MPEG550) did not appear to significantly alter the decontamination (post-contamination effectiveness for survival of guinea pigs challenged with GD for a fixed quantity of formulation applied after a fixed time delay following contamination. However, those tests did indicate that addition of over 20 w/w % water of the base medium exhibited a negative effect on the survival of guinea pigs decontaminated after exposure to GD. On the in-vitro side, the effectiveness for destruction of mustard gas using 0.625 molal KBDO in MPEG350 over a period of two hours decreased roonotonically for additions of water at 5%, 10%, and 20% to the formulation although the formulation retained more than 60% effectiveness for the highest addition. It is not expected that the results from MPEG550 would differ much from those of MPEG350. The MPEG350 was employed for ease of instrumental assessment. Results The base creams MG2 and MG4 provided significant levels of protection against HD when challenged at the same dosage level as used on the active creams (Table VI). On the other hand, they provided only erratic protection SUBSTITUTE SHEET - IB - against GD and none against VX when challenged with half the normal dose used for the active creams. All tlie active creams provided high levels of protection against all three agents, demonstrating excellent performance and reproducibility, except for Ft832 (1.25m KOPh) in the case of VX and for OMG4 (1.25m KOMP) in the case of GD. The cosmetic characteristics of the MG2-based systems were judged to be slightly superior to those of the MGl-based and MG3-based systems, which were slightly softer and harder, respectively (Table VIII). It is possible that these slight differences could have been corrected by minor adjustments to tlie proportions of the PEG components. Base creams MG2 and MG4 and active creams FMG2 (1.25m KOPh) and 0MG2 (1.25m KDAMO) were non-irritating to guinea pig skin (24h applications under ventilated or occluded conditions) and to rabbit eyes. Active cream 0MG4 (1.25m KOMP) on the other hand, was sli^itly irritating to skin and very irritating to eyes. The other creams were not tested for skin or eye irritancy. SUBSTITUTE SHEET TABLE I Gas Chromatographic Parameters for Analysis of CW Agents Agent Solvent Carrier gas Oven Temp Lower Program Oven Temp Upper Agent CO (He) flow lower ("C) hold rate u er ( * C) hold retention rate (mL/min) ro HD a Tetraglyme 20 8.0 HD b GD Tetraglyme 20 8.6 VX Tetraglyme 30 m 5.1 VX 2-Glycol MME 30 4.9 I I VX a m PEG MME 350 30 5.3 m VX L Hi a: First stage in temperature program, b: Second stage in temperature program. TABLE II Proton NMR Spectrum of K-2-glycol MMB a Compound CH 3 - 0-CH - CH2 - 0 - CH 2 - CH2 - OK Proton label A Chemical shift (ppm) 3.28 3.48 3.33 3.96 Type of peak singlet singlet singlet triplet Integration 3 C 4 C 2 C 2 C a: K-2-glycol MME * = potassium salt of diethylene glycol mono¬ methyl ether, b: Downfield from trimethylsilane. c: Number of hydrogens. TABLE III Chemical Shifts in the Proton NMR of the K-Salt-2-Glycol MHE a at Various ConcentratTons Proton label" A B C D Type of Signal Singlet Singlet Triplet Triplet Concentration (g per 0.5 mL) Chemical Shift (ppm) (DMS0-d6) 0.0062 3.27 0.0106 3.27 0.0208 3.27 0.0304 3.28 0.0459 3.28 a: K-2-glycol MME = potassium salt of diethylene glycol mono¬ methyl ether. b: See Table II for label identification. c: Downfield from trimethylsilane. SUBSTITUTE SHEET I = salt prepared in hexane/cyclohexane isolated and identified. I * = salt prepared _irι situ in tetraglyme. SUBSTITUTE SHEET TABLE V Decontamination Efficiency of Potassium Salts of 2-Glvcol MME and PEG 350 MME aαainst VX % Decontamination at reaction time to 10S 30S 1M 5M 10M 15M 20M C w 100 CO H ta-M m NJ 46 NJ C m a: Potassium salt of diethylene glycol monomethyl ether. rπ H b: Data extracted from Table IV. c: Potassium salt of polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether, molecular weight 350. d: 2-Glycol MME = diethylene glycol monomethyl ether. e: PEGMME 350 = polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether, molecular weight 350. Table VI Protection 1 Provided to Male Guinea Pigs by Active and Base Creams Against HP, VX, and GD Cream Agent HD GD VX 0(13) 2 0 (3) 66 + 21 (10) 98 + 4 ( 4) 96 +_ 4 ( 7) 90, 100 ( 2) Protection = % survival for GD and VX and % reduction in total skin damage effects (modified Draize) in relation to unprotected controls for HD. Note that agent challenges for GD and VX on base creams were only half those on active creams, 8 LD50 and 34 LD50 respectively, rather than 16 50 and 68 D50. A full challenge of HD was used. Values in parentheses for active creams indicate numbers of experiments conducted using at least 10 animals per experiment. Table VII Effect of KOPh Concentration on Protection 1 Provided to Male Guinea Pigs by PMG Barrier Creams Cream % Protection Range vs VX Barrier Base PMG2 (1m) 0,50 (2)2 0 (2) PMG2 (1.25m) 75,90 (2) 0 (2) PMG2 (1.5m) 40,100,90 (3) 0 (3) PMG2 (2m) 62,90 (2) 0 (2) Protection * = % Survival Values in parentheses for active creams indicate numbers of experiments conducted using 10 animals per experiment. SUBSTITUTE SHEET ho - non irritating + barely visible irritation ++ slight irritation +++ medium irritation ++++ severe irritation not tested

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A composition, in the form of cream or lotion, which comprises an alkali metal salt of acetophenone oxime, of 2,3-butanedione roonoxime, or of a polyethylene glycol monoether; dispersed in a substantially anhydrous state in a base medium comprising a polyethylene glycol and/or a polyethylene glycol ether; provided that the composition does not comprise an alkali metal salt of polyethylene glycol monoether and an alkali metal salt of a phenol carrying one or two hydroxy groups and, optionally, one or more C-^ alkyl and/or one or more C 1 _ 4 alkoxy groups. 2. A composition according to Claim 1, wherein the base medium comprises at least one polyethylene glycol ether and, optionally, a polyethylene glycol. 3. A composition according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, wherein the polyethylene glycol ether and polyethylene glycol are expressed by the formula R 1 0(CH 2 CH20) n -CH 2 -CH 2 -0R 2 , in which R 1 and R 2 are independently hydrogen or alkyl, and n is an integer. 4. A composition according to Claim 3, wherein R 1 and/or F 2 is C j ._ 4 alkyl. 5. A composition according to Claim 4, wherein R' ¬ and R 2 are each ethyl. 6. A composition according to Claim 5, wherein R' ¬ and R 2 are each methyl. SUBSTITUTE SHEET 7. A composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the ether has a molecular weight of up to 1900. 8. A composition according to Claim 7, wherein tle ether has a molecular weight of up to 550. 9. A composition according to Claim 7, wherein tle ether has a molecular weight of up to 350. 10. A composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the alkali metal is sodium or potassium. 11. A composition according to Claim 10, wherein the alkali metal is potassium. 12. A composition according to any preceding claim, wherein tlie alkali metal salt is of a polyethylene glycol monoether of the formula HCHC^C^O^-Cf^Cf^OR 3 in which R 3 is lower alkyl and m is an integer. 13. A composition according to Claim 12, wherein R 3 is methyl or ethyl. 14. A composition according to Claim 13, wherein R 3 is methyl. 15. A composition according to any of Claims 10 to 12, wherein m is an integer of 1 to 50. 16. A composition according to Claim 15, wherein the monoether has a molecular weight of up to 1900. SUBSTITUTE SHEET 17. A composition according to Claim 16, wherein the monoether has a molecular weight of up to 550. 18. A composition according to Claim 16, wherein the monoether has a molecular weight of up to 350. 19. A composition according to Claim 12, wherein the monoether is diethylene glycol monomethyl ether. 20. A composition according to any of Claims 1 to 11, wherein the alkali metal salt is of 2,3-butanedione monoximate. 21. A composition according to Claim 20, wherein the alkali metal salt is potassium 2,3-butanedione monoxide. 22. A composition according to any of Claims 1 to 11, wherein the alkali metal salt is of acetophenone oxime. 23. A composition according to Claim 22, wherein the alkali metal salt is potassium acetophenone oximate. 24. A composition according to any preceding claim, which additionally comprises an inert powder thickener. 25. A composition according to Claim 24, wherein the inert powder thickener is fine particle size silica. 26. A composition according to Claim 1, substantially as described in any of the Examples. SUBSTITUTE SHEET 27. A method for defence against chemical warfare agents, which comprises using a composition according to any preceding claim. 28. A cream or lotion according to any preceding claim in which the base medium further comprises up to about 10 w/w % of water. 29. A cream or lotion according to any preceding claim in which the base medium further comprises about 10 w/w % of water. SUBSTITUTE SHEET

Inventors: BANNARD ROBERT A B, CASSELMAN ALFRED A, MENDOZA CELSO E, PURDON J GARFIELD, BANNARD, ROBERT, A., B., CASSELMAN, ALFRED, A., MENDOZA, CELSO, E., PURDON, J., GARFIELD
Applicants: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN AS REPRE, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINIST
Application year: 1990
Main classification: A61K7
IPC codes: A62D3, A62D101