Fermentation and purification process for succinic acid

Abstract: A process for economically producing highly purified succinic acid comprises growing a succinate-producing microorganism on a low cost carbohydrate substrate; simultaneously neutralizing the fermentation broth and precipitating the succinate as calcium succinate by adding a calcium ion source to form calcium succinate; isolating the calcium succinate; slurrying the calcium succinate in water and treating it with sulfuric acid to form calcium sulfate and succinic acid; and then treating the succinic acid with first a strongly acidic ion exchanger and then a weakly basic ion exchanger to remove impurities and obtain a highly purified succinic acid product.

Description: The present invention relates to an improved process for the production of succinic acid by fermentation of carbohydrate to form a succinate salt, the subsequent conversion of the succinate salt to succinic acid, and the purification of the succinic acid. Succinic acid and its derivatives are widely used as a specialty chemical for applications in polymers, foods, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. Furthermore, succinic acid is a valuable 4-carbon intermediate useful for the production of 1,4-butanediol, tetrahydrofuran, and gamma -butyrolactone. The succinate ion is a common intermediate in the metabolic pathway of several anaerobic microorganisms. Succinate is a key intermediate for anaerobic fermentations by propionate-producing bacteria, but it is only produced in low yields and in low concentrations. In order to develop a commercially attractive process to produce succinic acid by fermentation, several important fermentation and product purification criteria need to be accomplished. The fermentation should be high yield (wt%) and produce a high product concentration using inexpensive raw materials and nutrients. Since anaerobic fermentations are run at neutral or near neutral pHs, salts of organic acids rather than the acids themselves are produced. The fermentation broth also contains cells, protein and other undesirable materials. The desired product from the process is the purified acid which can be used for specialty or commodity chemical manufacture. Hence, to be commercially viable, a high yielding, economical fermentation process has to be integrated with an efficient recovery and purification process. US-A-4564594 discloses a fermentation process wherein fungi of genus Rhizopus is grown to produce carboxylic acids, principally fumaric acid, and calcium carbonate is used in excess to provide pH control and formation of calcium salts of the product acids. EP-A-249773 discloses a fermentation process for the preparation of succinic acid using the microorganism Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens at a pH of between 5.8 and 6.5. In Example 4 thereof, the fermentation is carried out in a slurry of Ca(OH)₂ in water and the calcium succinate can thereafter be separated as the sparingly soluble calcium salt. Accordingly, in one aspect, this invention provides a process for producing succinic acid which comprises: (a) growing a succinate-producing microorganism upon a carbohydrate substrate under anaerobic conditions in a fermentor with CO₂ under partial pressure of at least 0.1 atmosphere to produce succinate in high yield and in high concentration, said substrate including an initial carbohydrate concentration of between about 20 g/l and about 100 g/l, and sodium ions, and being at a pH of between about 5.8 to about 6.6; (b) adding Ca(OH)₂ or calcium oxide to the fermentor to simultaneously neutralize the broth and precipitate the succinate as calcium succinate; (c) filtering the resulting slurry to remove the precipitated calcium succinate; (d) slurrying the calcium succinate with water and treating the slurry with sulfuric acid to form an aqueous mixture containing succinic acid, insoluble calcium sulfate and any residual cations and anions; (e) removing the insoluble calcium sulfate from the aqueous mixture; (f) treating the aqueous mixture with a strongly acidic cation exchanger in the free acid form to remove any cation impurities; and, (g) then treating the aqueous mixture with a weakly basic anion exchanger in the free base form to remove any strong anionic impurities to obtain a highly purified succinic acid product which contains less than 1% nitrogenous impurities and less than 5 ppm of sulfate. The preferred embodiments of the present invention disclose a novel process for producing succinate by fermentation, converting the succinate to succinic acid and purifying the succinic acid to obtain a highly purified product. In the drawings a schematic flow diagram of the process of the present invention is shown in Figure 1. In the preferred practice of the present invention, a culture of Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens (ATCC 53488) is anaerobically grown at a controlled pH between about 5.8 to about 6.6 in a fermentor with a medium containing carbohydrates; other nutrients, such as corn steep liquor; tryptophan; and, sodium ions under a partial pressure of at least about 0.1 atmosphere CO₂ until a yield of about 75 weight percent of succinate salt based on the weight of the carbohydrate is obtained and the fermentation broth contains at least about 20 g/l of succinate. The preferred strain ferments carbohydrate in a media containing high (6-10 g/l initial concentration) acetate concentrations giving high productivity (2-6 g/l hr) and high concentrations (40-80 g/l) of succinate. As a result, it is possible to successfully precipitate a calcium succinate product in the fermentor during the fermentation by using calcium hydroxide or calcium oxide for neutralization. The preferred fermentation and precipitation processes allow the concentration and purification of a dilute product using filtration. The precipitate has favorable filtration characteristics giving a high filtration rate (0.23-0.57 ℓ/sec m² {20-50 gal/hr ft²}). Batch fed batch, and continuous fermentor configurations all can be successfully used for the simultaneous fermentation and calcium succinate product precipitation. The filtrate thus obtained is heated to about 70° to about 95°C and to precipitate additional calcium succinate and refiltered. The heated filtrate may be seeded with calcium succinate if required. The filtrate which contains dissolved nutrients is preferably recycled to the fermentor. The desired succinic acid product is recovered from the precipitated calcium succinate by acidification of the succinate with sulfuric acid followed by filtration to remove the calcium sulfate (gypsum) which precipitates. The filtrate thus obtained is a concentrated aqueous succinic acid stream (150-300 g/l). The acidification of the calcium succinate is accomplished by slurrying the calcium succinate with water, preferably about 33% w/v, adding excess sulfuric acid to precipitate the calcium sulfate, followed by a careful neutralization of the excess acid with calcium hydroxide. The filter cake of calcium sulfate is washed with a volume of hot water equal to the volume of solution contained by the filter cake to remove all the succinic acid from the filter cake. The succinic acid aqueous stream (filtrate) also contains calcium and other cations, sulfate and other anions and nitrogeneous materials after the calcium sulfate removal. Since some of these impurities in the succinic acid stream are ionic in nature, it is unexpected to discover that the impurities can be removed without removing the succinic acid itself. In the preferred embodiment of the inventive process, the succinic acid aqueous stream is first treated with a cation exchanger (such as DOWEX® 50 WX8), having the ability to remove positively charged ions, and then with a weakly basic anion exchanger (such as Rohm and Haas Amberlite® IRA-94) which has the ability to remove negatively charged ions without removing the succinic acid which itself is an ionized product which could be lost in the ion exchange process. The proper selection of the types of ion exchange resins used, order of use, and operating parameters are all necessary to remove the impurities from the succinic acid aqueous stream without removing the succinic acid. This treatment also removes some contaminating nitrogenous impurities (proteins and amino acids). The result is a low cost, high purity, succinic acid product which contains low concentrations of impurities. The final product preferably will contain about 80 to about 99% succinic acid, on a dry basis, less then 1% nitrogenous impurities and less then 10 ppm of sulfate ions or other contaminating ions. The carbohydrate used in the fermentation can be any carbohydrate that is fermented by the strain of bacterium used. For A . succiniciproducens , suitable carbohydrate sources include dextrose, sucrose, fructose, lactose, soluble starches, and corn syrups. The fermentation is conducted in an aqueous medium containing tryptophan, sodium ions and dissolved carbon dioxide. Other nutrients and growth factors needed for the growth and the reproduction of the microorganism employed also may be added to the medium. The concentration of carbohydrate in the medium is between about 20 g/l to about 100 g/l, preferably between about 40 g/l and about 80 g/l. Carbohydrate concentrations above about 100 g/l give solutions with such high osmotic pressures that the organisms do not grow well. Although the organisms will grow in solutions containing less than 20 g carbohydrate per liter, the concentration of product is so low that its recovery usually is not practical. Carbon dioxide can be supplied to the fermentation medium in various ways. The medium can be sparged with CO₂ gas. The fermentation can be run in a pressurized reactor which contains carbon dioxide at superatmospheric pressure. The CO₂ can be mixed with other gases as long as the gases employed do not interfere with the growth and metabolism of the organism employed. Carbon dioxide can also be supplied to the fermentation medium by the addition of carbonates or bicarbonates which generate this gas under the conditions of the fermentation. The medium should contain dissolved CO₂ in equilibrium with a minimum of about 0.1 atmosphere partial pressure of carbon dioxide. In the preferred embodiment, the medium is saturated with carbon dioxide and the atmosphere contains about 0.3 atmosphere partial pressure of carbon dioxide or higher. In order to obtain good production of succinate salt, the pH of the medium is maintained in the range of from about 5.8 to about 6.6. At higher pH values, the main product is lactate rather than succinate, while at lower pH values, the fermentation is inhibited. The pH is conveniently maintained by the addition of calcium carbonate, calcium oxide or calcium hydroxide, or mixtures thereof. The fermentation process of this invention is carried out at a temperature between about 25°C and about 45°C. Optimum growth of the A . succiniciproducens organism is about 39°C. Since the preferred organism is a strict anaerobe, fermentations using the organism are carried out under anaerobic conditions in a medium which has been sterilized by heat or other means well known in the fermentation art. The practice of the invention is further illustrated by the Examples. EXAMPLES In the Examples, the fermentations used A . succinici-producens (ATCC 53488) and were conducted in a low cost media which, unless otherwise specified, contained: commercial grade dextrose, 50 g/l and corn steep liquor, 10 g/l (dry basis). After sterilization, the media was cooled to 39°C as 100% CO₂, was sparged through the fermentor. The pH was adjusted by adding 3M Na₂CO₃ unless otherwise specified. Twenty-five ppm of filter sterilized tryptophan was added to the media before it was reduced by adding 0.125 g/l cysteine hydrochloride. Fermentations were conducted at 38± 1°C in a gas phase of 1.0 atm CO₂ and pH controlled between 6.0 to 6.3 using a 25 wt% slurry of high purity industrial grade lime (calcium hydroxide). Precipitated calcium succinate solids from the fermentation broth were recovered by filtration. The filtrate was then heated to 80°C for 15 min to precipitate additional calcium succinate which was recovered by filtration. A . succiniciproducens fermentations of carbohydrates were conducted in batch, fed-batch, and continuous fermenations in 1-2 liter fermentors. Fermentations were scaled-up to 80 liter volume to prove the scalability of the process without affecting the yield and productivity. Recycling of spent filtrate was done in 2-liter batch fermentations. The precipitated calcium succinate was filtered at 39°C by vacuum filtration. Broths from 1l and 2l fermentations were filtered using No. 1 filter paper in a 17 cm dia. ceramic funnel. The filtrate was collected in a 2l vacuum flask. The filter cake was washed with the minimum volume required to remove all the filtrate. For larger fermentations a 0.68 Kg/m² (20-ounce) cotton twill filter cloth in a 30.48 cm (12-inch) diameter funnel was used for the filtration. The filtrate was then heated to 80°C, seeded with calcium succinate and mixed for 15 minutes allowing equilibrium to be established. The hot slurry was then filtered. The calcium succinate filter cake was washed with enough 80°C water to remove all filtrate. The washed calcium succinate cake was reslurried to 33% w/v solids with water. Concentrated sulfuric acid was slowly added, in 10% excess of the amount required to convert all of the calcium succinate to succinic acid. This slurry was mixed well and allowed to react completely. Then the resulting mixture of calcium sulfate (gypsum) solids a succinic acid solution was heated to 80°C and vacuum filtered through 0.68 Kg/m² (20-ounce) cotton twill filter cloth. The filter cake was washed with enough 80°C water to remove all the succinic acid. After calcium sulfate (gypsum) filtration, residual cations, anions, and nitrogenous materials still remained in the succinic acid filtrate. A strongly acidic cation exchange resin, in the acid form, such as Dowex® 50WX8 (Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI), was used to remove the calcium and other cation impurities. The solution was then treated with a weakly basic anion exchange resin in the free base form, such as Amberlite® IRA-94 (Rohm & Haas Co., Philadelphia, PA), which removes sulfate and other strong anionic contaminants without removing the succinic acid. 5.08 cm (Two-inch) diameter glass columns were used for ion-exchange purification of the succinic acid stream. The succinic acid stream was treated continuously in the columns at flow rates of 5-10 bed volumes per hour. Columns were regenerated using dilute (1-2 M ) sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid, as appropriate. Examples 1 and 2 Table 1 summarizes the comparative results obtained when fermentations were run at two different pH values, pH 6.1 and 6.8. The fermentors were gassed with 100% CO₂ at a rate of 10 ml/min. Fermentation media was supplemented with 25 ppm tryptophan. As can be seen in Table 1, the fermentation product spectrum is different at these two pH's. Lactate is the major product when the fermentation is carried out at pH 6.8. At pH 6.1 the major fermentation product is succinate with a yield of 87 wt%. Under these conditions, acetate is always produced as a major by-product. The organism did not grow or consume substrate at a pH of 5.5 or lower. The results show that fermentations need to be conducted at pH between 5.8 and 6.6 to obtain high succinate yield. The succinate yield based on dextrose consumption at optimum fermentation pH is 87-90 wt%. Comparative Succinate Fermentation (Batch 2-liter) at Different pH Values, Neutralization with Calcium hydroxide Ex. 1 Ex. 2 pH 6.1 pH 6.8 Dextrose (Initial), g/l 49.8 57.3 Dextrose (Final), g/l 0.0 1.6 Fermentation Time, hrs. 22.5 29.0 Products, Succinate, g 43.5 20.2 Acetate, g 11.3 5.4 Formate, g 0.6 2.1 Lactate, g 0 39.6 Succinate yield, wt (%) 87.3 36.3 Lactate Yield, wt (%) 0 37.0 Fermentation Conditions: (1) Temperature 39°C, (2) 1.0 atm CO₂ partial pressure. Examples 3, 4 and 5 Results of batch fermentations with different partial pressures of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in the gas phase of fermentor are presented in Table 2. Fermentations were carried out at a controlled pH of 6.2 ± 0.1 and the gas flow rate was 10 ml/min. Media was supplemented with 25 ppm tryptophan. Substrate fermentation and succinate yield is affected by the partial pressure of CO₂ in the gas phase. More substrate is fermented with an increase in the CO₂ partial pressure in the gas phase. Complete utilization of substrate and maximum succinate yield was only achieved when utilizing 100% CO₂ at atmospheric pressure in the gas phase. It is, therefore, clear that partial pressure of CO₂ in the gas phase is very important to achieve complete fermentation of substrate and to achieve high concentration and yield of succinate. Comparative Succinate Fermentation (Batch, 2-liter) at Different Partial Pressures of CO₂ in gas phase, pH Controlled at 6.2 with Calcium hydroxide Ex. 3 Ex. 4 Ex. 5 CO₂ Partial Pressures 0.1 atm 0.3 atm 1.0 atm Dextrose (Initial), g/l 48.6 45.2 47.5 Dextrose (final), g/l 33.1 10.2 0.6 Fermentation Time, hrs. 42.75 35.0 38.0 Products Succinate, g/l 12.1 26.8 41.2 Acetate, g/l 4.7 9.4 11.5 Formate, g/l 1.3 3.9 0.5 Lactate, g/l 0.0 0.0 0.0 Succinate yield, wt% 78.1 76.6 87.8 Fermentation Conditions: (1) Temperature 39°C. Examples 6 and 7 In addition to supplying the correct pressure of CO₂ for a successful fermentation by A . succiniciproducens , the fermentation also requires the presence of sodium ions. Table 3 summarizes comparative succinate fermentation results obtained in the presence and absence of added sodium ions in the media. Comparative Succinate Fermentation (Batch, 2-liter) in Presence and Absence of Sodium Ions, pH Controlled at 6.2 with Calcium hydroxide Ex. 6 Ex. 7 Sodium Chloride, g/l 0.0 3.5 Dextrose (Initial), g/l 47.3 45.4 Dextrose (Final), g/l 47.3 0.7 Products, g/l Succinate 0.0 40.7 Acetate 0.0 10.6 Formate 0.0 0.6 Lactate 0.0 0.0 Succinate yield, wt% 0.0 91.0 Fermentation Conditions: (1) 1.0 atm CO₂ partial pressure, (2) Temperature 39°C. Fermentation without added sodium ions produced no growth or substrate consumption. Thus, the fermentation of substrate to succinate occurred only when the appropriate quantity of sodium ions was added to the media. This was also shown by the results presented in Tables 1 and 2 when sodium ions was added as sodium carbonate to provide sodium ions as well as some dissolved carbon dioxide. These results indicated that addition of sodium ions was very critical for the start up and completion of succinate fermentation with a high yield. When fermentations were conducted with 50-60 g/l of initial dextrose without adding tryptophan, growth of A . succiniciproducens was very poor. Less than 10 g/l substrate was consumed. However, with tryptophan present at 25 ppm, complete fermentation of dextrose with high yield and productivity was achieved. The results indicate that to obtain high succinate yield and complete fermentation of substrate addition of tryptophan is necessary. Example 8 Fermentation with Recycle of Spent Filtrate Fermentation with recycle of spent filtrate was conducted in 2-liter fermentors with 100% CO₂ in gas phase. The pH was controlled at 6.2 ± 0.1 with 25 wt% calcium hydroxide slurry. Spent filtrate was obtained from a preceding fermentation run. Spent filtrate was added to the fermentation media in a ratio of 1:1 and nutrient additions were adjusted accordingly. Table 4 summarizes results of a batch fermentation with recycle of filtrate. The data showed a complete fermentation of dextrose. Unexpectedly, a maximum substrate consumption rate of 5.5 g/l hr is obtained with an overall productivity of 2.3 g/l hr. Succinate yield for filtrate recycle fermentations was 87%. The spent filtrate added to the recycle fermentations contains acetate. Thus, a higher concentration of acetate was expected at the end of recycle fermentations because of the acetate initially present. The results show that a very high rate of substrate fermentation was obtained by recycling spent filtrate without any adverse effects from higher acetate concentrations. Also the media cost was lowered because nitrogenous and other soluble nutrients were recycled and less needed to be added to the fermentation media. Succinate Fermentation with Spent Filtrate Recycle at pH 6.2, Neutralized with Calcium Hydroxide Ex. 13 Dextrose (Initial), g 49.2 Dextrose (Final), g 0.3 Maximum Substrate Consumption Rate, g/l-hr 5.5 Overall Productivity, g/l-hr 2.3 Products Succinate, g 43.0 Acetate, g 10.6 Formate, g 0.4 Succinate yield (wt%) 87.0 Fermentation Conditions: (1) CO₂ partial pressure 1.0 atm, (2) Temperature 39°C. High yield and high productivity using low cost media in conjunction with efficient recovery and purification steps are needed for an economical process. A very high succinate yield and productivity was achieved in a low cost medium irrespective of the fermentation mode (i.e. batch, fed-batch, small scale, large scale, multistage continuous) and with or without recycle of spent filtrate. Addition of spent filtrate to the fermentation up to a level of 50% did not decrease succinate yield and, in fact, increased fermentation productivity. Example 9 Recovery of Calcium Succinate Simultaneous carbohydrate fermentation with precipitation of product succinate as calcium succinate was achieved in the fermentation step. The first step in concentration and purification of the succinate slurry was filtration. The filtrate and filter cake were both collected for further processing. Example 10 Conversion of Calcium Succinate to Succinic Acid The calcium succinate filter cake was acidified with sulfuric acid, then the slurry of calcium sulfate solids (gypsum) and succinic acid solution was filtered to remove the gypsum. A quantity of sulfuric acid 10% greater than required to completely react with the calcium succinate was added to completely acidify the filter cake. After allowing time for complete reaction, the excess sulfuric acid was neutralized with calcium hydroxide. The slurry was heated to 80°C and the gypsum was removed by filtration. The calcium sulfate was then removed by filtration. The filtration rate was 64 gal/hr ft². The filter cake was washed with a volume of hot water equivalent to the volume of solution contained in the filter cake to remove all succinic acid. The succinic acid concentration in the soluble product, depending on the purity of the calcium succinate cake initially collected, ranged from 10% to 30% by weight. The purity of the succinic acid was improved from 52.1% to 89.6% by the acidification and filtration. The calcium ion was reduced from 36.6% to 1.6% (d.b.) by the acidification and filtration process. Nitrogenous impurities (protein) were reduced from approximately 10% of the weight of succinate to 1.67% of the weight of succinate. Example 11 Purification of Succinic Acid by Ion Exchange The succinic acid stream after the gypsum filtration contains calcium and other cations, sulfate and other anions, and nitrogenous impurities. Table 10 shows the composition of the stream at this point in the process. Carefully selected ion exchange processes are used to remove the contaminating ions. Strongly acidic cation exchange resin Dowex® 50WX8 (Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI) in the H⁺ cycle is used in a continuous flow column to remove the residual calcium and other cations. The succinic acid is not exchanged into this resin. Fortuitously and unexpectedly, some of the nitrogenous impurities (amino acids and proteins) are also removed along with the calcium ions. The product stream from the cation exchange purification step still contains anionic impurities such as sulfate (SO = / 4) and nitrogenous impurities (proteins and amino acids). Removal of the anionic impurities from succinic acid which contained the succinate anion is a difficult task because the ion exchange sites could be saturated with the succinate anion and not remove the impurity anions. However, it has been discovered that certain weakly basic anion exchange resins, among them Amberlite® IRA-94 (Rohm & Haas Co., Philadelphia, PA), in the free base cycle are suitable for removing the impurity anions in presence of succinate anions. The resin was used in a continuous flow column. The (SO = / 4) anion impurity was removed below the assay detection level of 5 ppm whereas the succinic acid was not ion exchanged. Some of the residual nitrogenous impurities were removed and a succinic acid product containing less than one percent nitrogenous material was obtained. The aqueous stream contained 14 to 30 percent succinic acid by weight at this point in the process. The overall process will now be described in connection with the schematic process diagram of Figure 1. Corn steep liquor, a reducing agent, if necessary, and a sodium salt are continuously heat-sterilized and blended with a fermentable carbohydrate which is fed into the blend as a continuously heat-sterilized concentrate. The blend is cooled and introduced into the first (seed) fermentor 11. The tryptophan is sterilized as required and blended with the other media components after cooling, and also fed to the seed fermentor 11. The carbon dioxide is continuously filter-sterilized and introduced into the fermentor 11. In addition, a sterile, 20-50% w/w slurry of calcium hydroxide or oxide (lime), is added to the fermentor 11 on demand for pH control. The final media in the seed fermentor 11 consists of 25-80 g/l d.b. of carbohydrate, 5-20 g/l d.b. corn steep liquor or other complex protein source, 5-50 ppm tryptophan, and a controlled concentration of sodium salts. Once the process is under way, spent filtrate, which is recycled to the fermentor 11, constitutes 0-90% v/v of the total feed. The optimal conditions for the fermentation depend on the microorganism selected. The preferred organism, A . succiniciproducens , is chosen for its high yield and high productivity at high succinate concentrations. For A . succiniciproducens the optimal conditions are: fermentation temperature, 32-42° C, pH = 5.8-6.6, and a positive carbon dioxide pressure (above atmospheric). Referring back to Figure 1, calcium hydroxide is added to the seed fermentor 11 and the main fermentor 12 on demand to maintain pH in the desired range. Carbon dioxide is added to the fermentors 11 and 12 continuously to supply CO₂ for metabolism and maintenance of anaerobic conditions. The carbon dioxide flow rate is 0.1 to 2.0 fermentor volumes per hour. Figure 1 shows a two-stage continuous fermentation. However, batch, fed batch and continuous fermentations have all been shown to give high yield, high productivity results. On this basis, the fermentation stage could be batch, fed batch or continuous. The fermentation stage could also be a combination of two or more configurations. The two-stage continuous configuration gives high succinate productivity with no turn around time as required between batch fermentations. The fermentation process produces a slurry of calcium succinate in fermentation broth. The calcium succinate is concentrated and separated from the fermentation broth by filtration. The filter cake collected is washed with an equivalent volume of saturated calcium succinate solution or water, at 37°C, to remove all filtrate broth from the product cake. Referring back to Fig. 1, in the calcium succinate recovery step, the final fermentation slurry leaves the main fermentor 12 and first goes to a cyclone separator 13 or gravity settling vessel where the calcium succinate solids are separated from the supernatant liquid. The supernatant liquid is heated after it leaves the separator 13 to 70-95°C to precipitate more calcium succinate and the resulting slurry goes to a second separator 14. The solids from both separators 13 and 14 are combined and fed to a filter 15. There, a 30-60 wt. % succinate cake is separated from the filtrate and washed with one solids volume of a hot (70-95°C) calcium succinate saturated solution or a hot water stream. The wash is necessary to remove impurities from the filter cake. The filtrate is combined with the supernate from the second separator 14 and the stream is split into two portions. One portion (0-90%) of this spent filtrate is recycled back to the seed fermentor 11. The remainder of the filtrate is treated anaerobically to produce carbon dioxide and methane from the residual organic acids. The filtrate washed from the cake is recycled to the second separator 14. The recovery of succinic acid from the calcium succinate portion of the process of Fig. 1 will now be described. The calcium succinate filter cake is acidified with sulfuric acid to produce succinic acid and calcium sulfate. The calcium sulfate precipitates as gypsum (CaSO₄ 2H₂0) and is removed from the succinic acid by filtration. On a stoichiometric basis about 5% to about 10% excess sulfuric acid is added for the acidification. After an appropriate holding time for establishing completely acidified conditions, the excess sulfuric acid is neutralized with calcium hydroxide. This slurry is maintained at a temperature of 70-95°C and the gypsum is removed by filtration. Referring to Fig. 1 the washed calcium succinate filter cake from the filter 15, e.g. a belt press filter, is slurried with water in a tank 16 to 20-40% w/v solids and fed to an acidification vessel 17. Concentrated sulfuric acid is slowly added in 5-10% excess to completely convert the calcium succinate in the slurry to succinic acid. The succinic acid goes into solution and calcium sulfate (gypsum) precipitates from the mixture. The residual sulfuric acid is neutralized with 40-55% industrial grade lime slurry in a neutralization vessel 18. This slurry is heated to 70-95°C and the precipitated gypsum is filtered through a filter 19. The filter cake is washed with its own volume of 70-95°C water to recover all the succinate acid and the filtrate and wash are combined. The washed gypsum cake is a by-product. The succinic acid stream after calcium sulfate (gypsum) filtration contains calcium, sulfate, nitrogenous compounds and acetic acid as major impurities. The ion exchange treatment removes the calcium and sulfate impurities to below detectable concentrations. Some nitrogenous materials were also removed. A strongly acidic cation exchanger, such as Dowex® 50WX8, in the H⁺ cycle is used in a continuous flow column to remove calcium and other cations. A weakly basic anion exchanger, such as Amberlite® IRA-94, in the free base cycle, is used to remove sulfate and other anionic impurities. Careful control of the ion exchange process allows the anionic impurities to be removed without removing the succinic acid. The portion of Fig. 1 relating to the purification of succinic acid by ion exchange will now be described. The succinic acid solution from the belt press filter 19 enters a column 20 filled with strongly acidic cation exchange resin in the hydrogen cycle. Calcium and other cations are removed by this ion exchanger. The solution then passes through a weakly basic anion exchange column 21 where the resin is loaded to its limit with strong anions to avoid loss of succinic acid. This resin is in the free base cycle. Both the cation and anion resins may be regenerated by conventional methods. The succinic acid product thus obtained contains less than 1% nitrogenous impurities (protein) and an undetectable concentration of cations such as calcium and anions such as sulfate. Low impurity concentration makes this product ideal for specialty and commodity chemical uses. For conversion to commodity intermediates, the solution may be further concentrated by evaporation. Additional purity, if desired, may be obtained by crystallization, carbon absorption, electrochemical methods, esterification followed by distillation of the volatile esters. The evaporated solution may also be further heated to produce succinic anhydride which is volatile and recoverable by distillation and condensation of the anhydride. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the economic production of succinic acid from carbohydrates for use in specialty and commodity chemicals, requires a fermentation process that uses low cost nutrients, produces high product concentration at a high productivity and an efficient and low-cost purification process. The novel process of the present invention meets those requirements.

Claims: A process for producing succinic acid which comprises: (a) growing a succinate-producing microorganism upon a carbohydrate substrate under anaerobic conditions in a fermentor with CO₂ under partial pressure of at least 0.1 atmosphere to produce succinate in high yield and in high concentration, said substrate including an initial carbohydrate concentration of between about 20 g/l and about 100 g/l, and sodium ions, and being at a pH of between about 5.8 to about 6.6; (b) adding Ca(OH)₂ or calcium oxide to the fermentor to simultaneously neutralize the broth and precipitate the succinate as calcium succinate, characterised by: (c) filtering the resulting slurry to remove the precipitated calcium succinate; (d) slurrying the calcium succinate with water and treating the slurry with sulfuric acid to form an aqueous mixture containing succinic acid, insoluble calcium sulfate and any residual cations and anions; (e) removing the insoluble calcium sulfate from the aqueous mixture; (f) treating the aqueous mixture with a strongly acidic cation exchanger in the free acid form to remove any cation impurities; and, (g) then treating the aqueous mixture with a weakly basic anion exchanger in the free base form to remove any strong anionic impurities to obtain a highly purified succinic acid product which contains less than 1% nitrogenous impurities and less than 5 ppm of sulfate. A process according to Claim 1 in which the filtrate obtained in step (c) is heated to about 70°C to about 95°C to precipitate any available calcium succinate, which is then removed by filtration and the filtrate which contains nutrients is recycled to the fermentor. A process according to Claim 1 or 2, in which the fermentation is conducted on a batch basis. A process according to Claim 1 or 2, in which the fermentation is conducted on a fed batch basis. A process according to Claim 1 or 2, in which fermentation is conducted on a continuous basis. A process according to any preceding claim in which the microorganism has the identifying characteristics of Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens ATCC 53488.

Inventors: DATTA RATHIN, GLASSNER DAVID A, JAIN MAHENDRA K, ROY JOHN R VICK, DATTA, RATHIN, GLASSNER, DAVID A., JAIN, MAHENDRA K., ROY, JOHN R. VICK
Applicants: MICHIGAN BIOTECH INST, MICHIGAN BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
Application year: 1990
Main classification: C12P7
IPC codes: C07C55, C07C51, C12R1, C12P7