PIEZOELECTRIC CERAMIC MATERIAL

Abstract: This invention relates to a piezoelectric ceramic material that can be used as various types of electro­ mechanical transducer element for a buzzer, an actuator, a pressure sensor or the like, and more specifically to a piezoelectric ceramic material that can be produced by sintering at 850 o C or lower temperature.

Description: This invention relates to a piezoelectric ceramic material that can be used as various types of electromechanical transducer element for a buzzer, an actuator, a pressure sensor or the like, and more specifically to a piezoelectric ceramic material that can be produced by sintering at 850°C or lower temperature. (Prior Art) A three-component system solid solution such as Pb(Mg 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O₃ . PbTiO₃ . PbZrO₃ or Pb(Ni 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O₃ . PbTiO₃ . PbZrO₃, or the like has been known heretofore as a piezoelectric ceramic material of this kind comprising a composite perovskite oxide. Since said solid solution has superb electric and mechanical characteristics, it is widely used as a piezoelectric ceramic material which is generally called a "soft" material. However, temperatures at which these conventional piezoelectric ceramic materials are sintered range generally between 1200°C and 1300°C. Even when a material which can be sintered at a comparatively lower temperature is used, the sintering temperature thus far had to be 1100°C or higher. Furthermore, since the melting point of PbO contained in such a piezoelectric ceramic material is 1000°C or lower and said PbO thus has a vapor pressure of several thousands of Pa. (tens of torr) at said sintering temperature, it is extremely difficult to prevent PbO from evaporating under this condition. In view of the fact that PbO vapors are highly harmful to a human body, therefore, it is by all means necessary to provide a preventive measure to avoid diffusion into the atmosphere of said vapors, thus requiring an environmental pollution prevention equipment to be provided therewith. In addition, when PbO is evaporated, it causes an A-site defect of the piezoelectric ceramic. As a result, PbO contained in a piezoelectric ceramic material obtained by sintering is quantitatively uneven in a sinter and between sinters, thus causing partially uneven baking in the sinter and qualitative disparity between the sinters of different lots. To solve the foregoing problems, there has been proposed, as disclosed in the Japanese Examined Patent Application Publication Tokkosho 62-57594, a manufacturing method of a piezoelectric ceramic material in which calcined powder consisting of an alkaline metallic salt and PbF₂ is added to calcined powder of lead titanate . zirconate as a sintering temperature depressant to carry out sintering at a temperature lower than the melting point of PbO, thereby preventing PbO from evaporating during sintering. (Problems to be Solved by the Invention) Since an alkaline metallic salt is used as one component of the sintering temperature depressant in the foregoing manufacturing method, the alkaline metallic salt which is water-soluble is eluted into an aqueous solvent during the manufacturing process of the material powder, thus causing quantity of the alkaline metallic salt contained in the material powder to be inconsistent from lot to lot. Consequently, there arises a problem of qualitative disparity among the piezoelectric ceramic materials produced by said method. Furthermore, the piezoelectric ceramic material obtained by said method gives a low electromechanical coupling factor or only 52% at most. If an organic solvent such as alcohol or acetone is used in the mixing process to mix materials and in the grinding or pulverizing process after calcination, elution into the solvent of the alkaline metallic salt can be prevented. This, however, requires to make all the manufacturing facilities explosion-proof, so that it should incur much greater equipment cost and consequently higher production cost. In addition, since any one of the piezoelectric ceramic materials obtained by the foregoing method contains an alkaline metallic salt, there is in general a danger that said alkaline metallic salt is gradually eluted out of the ceramic material when placed in water or in a high-humidity environment. This gives rise to a reliability problem in view of the existing industrial standard on electronic parts that electric characteristics of an electronic part should remain undeteriorated even when left under humidity of 90% RH or higher for 1000 hours. It is, therefore, the object of the present invention to provide a piezoelectric ceramic material that is free from the foregoing problems. (Means for Solving the Problems) To attain the above object, the present invention provides a piezoelectric ceramic material mainly composed of a composite perovskite oxide whose composition is expressed by a general formula of: Pb ( Ni 1/3 Nb 2/3 ) a . ( Zn 1/3 Nb 2/3 ) b . ( Fe 2/3 . W 1/3 ) c . ( Ti x Zr y ) d O₃ , wherein a + b + c + d = 1 , 0.20 < a + b < 0.50 , 0.02 < c <0.15 , and x + y = 1 , (where a, b, c, d, x and y all represent a positive number), and an A site/B-site molar ratio thereof is 1.01 or higher. The reason why the component ratio has been defined as indicated above in the general formula is because, with the ratio falling outside of the defined range, there can not be obtained a piezoelectric ceramic material having a practically sufficient electromechanical coupling factor when sintered at 850°C or lower. Especially when the "a + b" value is greater than 0.50, it is difficult for the ceramic material to have a perovskite crystal structure which manifests piezoelectricity formed therein so that said ceramic material will not show the piezoelectric property. This will cause Curie temperature of the piezoelectric ceramic to drop to 180°C or lower and the piezoelectric property thereof to become unstable with respect to environmental temperatures, thus making the product unsuitable for practical use. Further, when "c" value is greater than 0.15, an insulation resistance value of the sinter becomes lower and there should arise a problem that a dielectric breakdown of the element made of such a ceramic material is more likely to occur at the time of polarization. The x and y values that determine the solid solution ratio of lead titanate (PbTiO₃) to lead zirconate (PbZrO₃), both of which are contained in the component Pb(Ti x Zr y ) d O₃ can be appropriately selected so as to obtain a suitable electromechanical coupling factor. As for the A-site/B-site molar ratio of the composite perovskite oxide, it is preferrable to set the ratio at 1.01 - 1.03 for the purpose of preventing the dielectric strength of the piezoelectric ceramic material from becoming lower. (Embodiment) Now, an embodiment example of the present invention together with a comparison example will be explained for one to understand the present invention better. To provide an embodiment example of the present invention, each of the industrial-use metal oxide powders, NiO, ZnO, Fe₂O₅, Nb₂O₅, WO₃, and ZrO₂ was accurately weighed to conform to each component ratio indicated on Table given hereinafter. After mixing them by a wet ball mill for 10 hours, they were calcined at 1000°C in the atmosphere for two hours to obtain calcined powder thereof. The calcined powder was put in the ball mill, ground and mixed again thereby for another 10 hours and, thereafter, the remaining components PbO and TiO₂ were added thereto in accordance with their respective component ratios shown on the Table, and mixed with the others. The mixture was then calcined at 750°C in the atmosphere for was measured respectively of electric characteristics including relative dielectric constant (ε) and dielectric loss (tanδ) before and after the polarization treatment, and radial electromechanical coupling factor (Kp%). The results obtained thereby are as shown on the Table. As is clear from the Table, the piezoelectric ceramic material used in the embodiment examples 1 through 42 gives before and after the polarization treatment the relative dielectric constant and dielectric loss which are such that they pose no practical problem, and the electromechanical coupling factor which is as high as 52% at the lowest. Compared with the above, the comparison examples 1 through 14 in which the ceramic material contained no c component or Pb(Fe 2/3 W 1/3 ) O₃, the comparison examples 15 through 18 in which the ceramic material had a smaller component ratio for a component plus b component than that falling within the range thereof according to the present invention, the comparison examples 19 through 26 in which the ceramic material had a larger component ratio for a component plus b component than that falling within the range thereof according to the present invention, and the comparative examples 27 through 35 in which the ceramic material had a larger component ratio for c component than that falling within the range thereof according to the present invention, all showed a lower electromechanical coupling factor as compared with the embodiment examples although all of these comparison eaxamples gave a relative dielectric constant and a dielectric loss, before and after the polarization treatment, which are comparable to those in the embodiment examples. (Effect of the Invention) As described in the foregoing, according to the present invention, it is possible to produce even through a comparatively low temperature sintering a piezoelectric ceramic material that has a practically sufficient electromechanical coupling factor.

Claims: A piezoelectric ceramic material mainly composed of a composite perovskite oxide whose composition is expressed by the general formula of: Pb [( Ni 1/3 Nb 2/3 ) a . ( Zn 1/3 Nb 2/3 ) b . (Fe 2/3 . W 1/3 ) c . ( Ti x Zr y ) d ] O ₃, wherein a + b + c + d = 1 , 0.20<a + b<0.50 , 0.02<c<0.15 , and x + y = 1 , (where a, b, c, d, x and y all represent a positive number), and an A-site/B-site molar ratio thereof is 1.01 or higher. A piezoelectric ceramic material according to claim 1, wherein the A-site/B-site molar ratio of the composite perovskite oxide ranges from 1.01 to 1.03.

Inventors: BAN, HIROSHI, NAGASAWA, SEIZI, NARITA, NAOTO
Applicants: TAIYO YUDEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Application year: 1989
Main classification: C04B35
IPC codes: C04B35, H01L41