Carbonylation catalyst

Abstract: Described are catalysts which are useful for the carbonylation of alcohols, ethers and ether alcohols to esters and, optionally, to carboxylic acids, by reaction thereof in the vapor state, said catalysts having the formulae H[MW 12 PO 40 ] in which M is selected from Pd, Mn, Co, Ni and Zn; Na 8 [Rh 2 W 12 O 42 ] RhW x Mo y PO 40 wherein the combinations x/y are selected from 8/4, 6/6, 4/8 and 2/10.

Description: The present invention relates to catalysts which are useful for the carbonylation of alcohols, ethers and ether alcohols to esters and, optionally, to carboxylic acids by reaction thereof in the vapor state. Carbonylation of alcohols and ethers to their corresponding esters is a well known art and is illustrated in Equations 1 and 2 below. (1) 2ROH + CO → R[(O)OR + H 2 O (2) ROR' + CO → RC(O)OR' In addition, alcohols can be carbonylated to carboxylic acids as shown in Equation 3, below. (3) ROH + CO → RC(O)OH Carbonylation of methanol, equations 1 and 3, is a well known reaction and is traditionally carried out in the liquid phase with a catalyst. The catalyst typically comprises a Group VIII metal, a halide promoter (normally some form of iodide) and occasionally a ligand such as PR 3 or NR 3 (R being organic moiety). The most common catalyst for a liquid phase system is Rh in combination with HI/CH 3 I. This catalyst is considered "state of the art" and is described in US-A-3,769,329. This technology/catalyst is utilized in many commercial processes that generate acetic acid via methanol carbonylation. The operating conditions are about 180 - 200°C. and about 3.1 MPa (450 psi) CO with > 95% selectivity to methyl acetate/acetic acid. Prior to the development of the Rh and HI/CH 3 I system, the reaction was carried out in a liquid phase system with Co-I catalysts such as described in US-A-3,060,233. The operating conditions are about 200°C. and about 48.3-69 MPa (7,000-10,000 psi) CO. The product selectivity is about 93%. A number of researchers have described the use of Ni-based catalysts for the carbonylation reaction. An example is EP 18 927. The catalyst of that publication consists of Ni and a combination of ionic iodides (example: KI) and covalent iodides (example: CH 3 I). The reaction is carried out at about 150°C. and about 5.5-6.9 MPa (800-1,000 psi) CO. All of the liquid phase catalysts that generate methyl acetate/acetic acid at commercially acceptable rates and selectivities require the use of an iodide promoter, typically CH 3 I and/or HI, and high pressure (at least about 3.1 MPa, 450 psi). The iodides are highly corrosive and necessitate the use of expensive corrosion resistant materials of construction. In addition, separation of the catalyst is a major problem and requires special equipment. Vapor phase carbonylation of methanol has the advantage of easy product separation from the catalyst. In most cases, patents describing homogeneous catalysts also claim that the reaction can be carried out in the vapor phase [e.g., methanol and an iodide containing compound (CH 3 I) are co-fed] with the catalyst supported on a material such as silica (SiO 2 ) or alumina (Al 2 O 3 ). Rarely are examples given. The following descriptions refer to references which deal only with vapor phase carbonylation. A considerable amount of work has been carried out on heterogeneous versions of the Rh/CH 3 I system described above, see for example, Journal of Catalysis ( 13 , p. 106, 1969 and 27 , p. 389, 1972). In a typical illustration, Rh is supported on activated carbon and a gaseous mixture of CO, CH 3 OH, and CH 3 I is passed over the catalyst at 175-250°C. and 2.1 MPa (300 psi). The catalyst is active and nigh yields of acetic acid/methyl acetate are obtained. In similar work, Rh is impregnated on Al 2 O 3 (Krzywicki et. al., Bull. Soc. Chim. France , 5 , p. 1094, 1975), SiO 2 and TiO 2 (Krzywicki et.al ., J. Mol. Cat. , 6 , p. 431, 1979) or zeolite-encapsulated (Schwartz et.al., J. Mol. Cat. , 22 , p. 389, 1984). In both cases CH 3 OH and CH 3 I are co-fed to the reactor containing the catalyst. It should be noted that in all these examples CH 3 I is required in order for the carbonylation reaction to work. In JP-A-59139330, the carbonylation catalyst consists of Ni supported on activated carbon. The reaction is carried out at 200-300°C. and 1.05 MPa (150 psi) with a feed mixture of CO : CH 3 OH : CH 3 I = 5 : 1 : 0.01. At 300°C., the methanol conversion is 100% and the acetic acid/methyl acetate selectivity is > 95%. In JP-A-59172436 the same catalyst is utilized to carbonylate dimethyl ether. In DE-A-3323654 a CH 3 OH/CH 3 I feed mixture is carbonylated with a Pd-Ni catalyst supported on activated carbon. The reaction is carried out at 300°C. and 0.1 MPa (1 atm) CO. Gates , J. Mol. Cat. , 3 , p. 1, 1977, reports that Rh impregnated in crosslinked polystyrene is a vapor phase catalyst for the carbonylation of CH 3 OH. Catalyst activity and stability are low. In JP-A-56104838 and JP-A-56104839 various Group VIII metals (Rh, Ni, Pd, Ru, Co) and rare earth metal oxides (Cs, La) are supported on silica. Methanol carbonylation is carried out at 150-200°C. and 0.1-0.5 MPa (1-5 atm) CO, and methyl acetate selectivity is high. In these examples, CH 3 I is not utilized in the reaction feed. Vapor phase processes that need CH 3 I as a promoter will be corrosive and require expensive materials of construction. In addition, extensive separation/purification procedures are required in order to remove iodides from the product. Heteropoly acids are well known compounds. The name "heteropoly acids" refers to a broad class of compounds of varying composition. A good general review of their physical properties is given by Tisgdinos in Climax Molybdenum Company, Bulletin Cdb-12a, 1969. The use of heteropoly acids in many areas of catalysis is well known including dehydration of alcohols, Friedel-Crafts type reactions, oxidative dehydrogenation and partial oxidation of organic compounds. For examples see Matveev, et. al., J. Mol. Cat. , 38 , 345, 1986, Dun, et. al., Applied Catalysis, 21 , 61, 1986, Nomiya, et. al., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jap., 53 , 3719, 1980, and Izumi, et. al. J. Mol. Cat., 18 , 299, 1983. Recently, much attention has been given to heteropoly acids as a catalyst for the conversion of methanol into hydrocarbons: (4) xCH 3 OH → CH 2 =CH 2 + CH 3 CH=CH 2 + other hydrocarbons See Moffat, et.al ., J. of Cat., 77 , p. 473, 1982, Ono, et. al. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jap. , 55 , p. 2657, 1982, and Moffat, et.al ., J. of Cat. , 81 , p. 61, 1983. This reaction is carried out in the vapor phase (300-375°C.) and the products include ethylene, propylene and saturated C 1-5 hydrocarbons. Reaction 4 dominates the known chemistry of reactions of methanol in the presence of heteropoly acids. It was therefore unexpected to find that methanol carbonylation could be carried out with heteropoly acids. Hetero polyacids and polyoxometalate anions constitute well recognized compositions. They embrace the well-known complexes called isopolyoxoanions and heteropolyoxoanions. They are represented by the general formulas (See Pope, Heteropoly and Isopoly Oxometalates, Published by Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983, page 1.) [M m O y ] p- Isopolyanions wherein M is at least one metal taken from Group V and VI of the Periodic Chart of the Elements (such as molybdenum, tungsten, vanadium, niobium, chromium, and tantalum) in their highest (d 0 , d 1 ) oxidation states, and X is a heteroatom from all groups of the Periodic Chart of the Elements with the possible exception of the rare gases. Pope, supra , page 2, takes the position that the "terms polyoxometalate or or polyoxoanion might be therefore more appropriate to describe the field." . The invention is directed to solid catalysts suitable for the carbonylation of one or more of alcohols, ethers and ether alcohols to esters and optionally, to carboxylic acids, by reaction thereof in the vapor state. These carbonylation catalysts are of the formulae (a) H[MW 12 PO 40 ] in which M is selected from Pd, Mn, Co, Ni and Zn; (b) Na 8 [Rh 2 W 12 O 42 ] (c) RhW x Mo y PO 40 wherein the combinations x/y are selected from 8/4, 6/6, 4/8 and 2/10. The preferred catalyst is deposited on a support which is inert to the reaction. The preferred support is silica, especially a high surface area silica. The alcohols and ethers that may be carbonylated by the catalyst of the invention include any alcohol and ether compound or combination of the two. They are preferably exemplified by alcohols and ethers in which an aliphatic carbon atom is directly bonded to an oxygen atom of either an alcoholic hydroxyl group in the compound or an ether oxygen in the compound. Such compounds may contain aromatic groups. The preferred alcohols and ethers that may be carbonylated by the catalyst of the invention include alkanols of 1 to about 20 carbon atoms, alkane polyols of 2 to about 24 carbon atoms, alkyl monoethers of 2 to about 20 carbon atoms, alkyl alkylene polyethers of 4 to about 40 carbon atoms and alkoxyalkanols of 3 to about 20 carbon atoms. Illustrative of suitable alcohols and ethers that may be carbonylated by the catalysts of the invention are: CH 3 OH CH 3 CH 2 OH CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 OH CH 3 CH(OH)CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OH CH 3 CH 2 (CH 3 )CHOH CH 3 (CH 3 )CHCH 2 OH CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OH CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH(OH)CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH(OH)CH 2 CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH(OH)CH 2 CH 3 CH 3 (CH 3 )C(OH)CH 2 CH 3 CH 3 (CH 3 )CHCH(OH)CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OH CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH(OH)CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH(OH)CH 2 CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 (CH 3 )CHCH 2 OH CH 3 CH 2 (CH 3 )CHCH 2 CH 2 OH CH 3 CH 2 (CH 3 CH 2 )CHCH 2 OH CH 3 (CH 3 CH 2 )CHCH 2 CH 2 OH CH 3 (CH 2 ) 8 OH CH 3 (CH 2 ) 17 OH CH 3 (CH 2 ) 8 (CH 3 )CH 2 OH C 6 H 11 OH C 6 H 11 CH 2 OH C 6 H 5 CH 2 OH o-C 6 H 5 (CH 2 OH) 2 p-C 6 H 5 (CH 2 OH) 2 1,2,4-C 6 H 5 (CH 2 OH) 3 p-C 6 H 5 (CH 2 CH 2 OH) 2 HOCH 2 CH 2 OH HOCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OH HOCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OH HO(CH 2 ) 4-17 CH 2 OH (HOCH 2 ) 4 C 1,4-HOC 6 H 4 CH 2 OH CH 3 OCH 3 CH 3 CH 2 OCH 3 CH 3 CH 2 OCH 2 CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 OCH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 OCH 2 CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 OCH 2 CH 2 CH 3 CH 3 CH(OCH 3 )CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OCH 3 CH 3 CH 2 (CH 3 )CHOCH 3 CH 3 (CH 3 )CHCH 2 OCH 2 CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OCH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH(OCH 2 CH 2 OCH 3 )CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH(OCH 3 )CH 2 CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH(OCH 2 CH 3 )CH 2 CH 3 CH 3 (CH 3 )C(OCH 2 CH 3 )CH 2 CH 3 CH 3 (CH 3 )CHCH(OCH 2 CH 2 OCH 2 CH 3 )CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OCH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH(OCH 3 )CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH(OCH 3 )CH 2 CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 (CH 3 )CHCH 2 OCH 3 CH 3 CH 2 (CH 3 )CHCH 2 CH 2 OCH 3 CH 3 CH 2 (CH 3 CH 2 )CHCH 2 OCH 3 CH 3 (CH 3 CH 2 )CHCH 2 CH 2 OCH 3 CH 3 (CH 2 ) 8 OCH 3 CH 3 (CH 2 ) 17 OCH 3 CH 3 (CH 2 ) 8 (CH 3 )CH 2 OCH 3 C 6 H 11 OCH 3 C 6 H 11 OC 6 H 11 C 6 H 11 CH 2 OC 6 H 5 C 6 H 5 OCH 3 C 6 H 5 OH C 6 H 5 CH 2 OCH 3 o-C 6 H 5 (CH 2 OCH 3 ) 2 p-C 6 H 5 (CH 2 OCH 3 ) 2 1,2,4-C 6 H 5 (CH 2 OCH 3 ) 3 CH 3 (OCH 2 CH 2 ) 1-30 OCH 3 C 6 H 5 CH 2 OCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OH CH 3 OCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OH CH 3 O(CH 2 ) 4-17 CH 2 OH (CH 3 OCH 2 ) 4 C sym-CH 3 OC 6 H 4 CH 2 OH CH 3 (OCH 2 CH 2 ) 1-30 OH (CH 3 OCH 2 ) 2 (HOCH 2 ) 2 C 1,4-CH 3 OCH 2 C 6 H 4 CH 2 OCH 3 The corresponding process involves providing the alcohol and/ether in the vapor state and passing the vapor over a bed containing the solid catalyst of the invention. The temperture at which the reaction is effected is not seen to be narrowly critical. A temperature between about 100°C and about 350°C is usable. Preferably, the temperature of the reaction is between about 125°C and about 325°C, and temperatures between about 150°C and about 300°C are most preferred. The reaction pressure accommodates the requirement that the reactants be fed to the reactor in the vapor state. However, the pressure at which the reaction may be carried out may range from about 0.1 MPa (1 atmosphere ) to about 100 MPa (1,000 atmospheres), with pressures of greater than 0.1 MPa (1 atmosphere) to about 3.5 MPa (35 atmospheres) being preferred. The particular reactants and the rate of reaction will impact on the pressure of the reaction zone. The reaction zone is where the catalyst is located. The reaction may be carried out in a tubular reactor using a fixed bed of the catalyst. The reactants may be fed to the catalyst by feeding down or up, or a combination of both, to a fixed bed located in an upright tubular reactor. It is preferred to use a reactor design that operates by plug flow and causes the minimal turbulence in the reaction zone. The reaction may be effected in a dynamic bed of the catalyst. In such a reaction, the bed of catalyst is moving such as in the case of a fluid bed of the catalyst. The gas hourly space velocity (GHSV - gas hourly space velocity. This is the rate of gas flow over the catalyst. It is determined by dividing the volume of gas (at 25°C. and 0.1 MPa, 1 atm.) which passes over the catalyst in one hour by the volume of the catalyst.) of the reactants through the reaction zone may be over a broad range. For example, the GHSV may range from about 50 to about 50,000 hr. -1 , preferably from about 900 to about 25,000 hr. -1 . The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV - liquid hourly space velocity. This is the rate that the liquid organic substrate is fed to the reactor. It is determined by dividing the liquid volume pumped in one hour by the volume of catalyst.) to the reactor when the feed is vaporized within the reactor may range from about 0.01 to about 10 hr. -1 . Where the alcohol, ether and/or the ether alcohol reactant is a higher boiling material not easily vaporized it can be diluted with a lower boiling nonreactive solvent or diluent and thus transported over the solid catalyst. The degree of dilution in some cases can be quite extreme and of course, such conditions will adversely affect the cost of carbonylation. Suitable solvents and diluents include aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, halogenated hydrocarbons, esters, ketones, and the like. The invention involves a new family of catalysts for carrying out the carbonylation reactions herein described such as the carbonylation of methanol or dimethyl ether to methyl acetate/acetic acid. These catalyst compositions are based on idealized stoichiometries. The exact structure and composition of the ultimate catalyst (i.e., the composition effecting the catalytic activity as contrasted with the starting heteropoly acid) is not known. The catalyst structure may exist as monomers, dimers and so forth. The waters of hydration are not known and are not included in the catalyst formulae. All of the M[W 12 PO 40 ]/SiO 2 catalysts utilized herein as catalyst precursors were prepared in a similar manner, a typical example is as follows: Under N 2 at room temperature, RhCl 3 H 2 O (0.47 g., 1.8 mmoles) was dissolved in 50 milliliters of methanol and stirred for 0.5 hr. H 3 W 12 PO 40 (15-20 wt.% water, 6.5 g., 1.8 mmoles) was added and this solution was stirred for 1.0 hour. To the solution was added 3.9 g. of grade 12 silica gel (SiO 2 ) and the resulting slurry was stirred for an additional 4.0 hours. The methanol was then removed at 80°C. under vacuum yielding a red powder. If needed, the flask was further heated with a heat gun until the powder was free flowing. The material was placed in a vial and stored under N 2 . The empirical formula of the composition is Rh[W 12 PO 40 ]/SiO 2 . Some of the M[W 12 PO 40 ] catalysts were prepared with metal nitrate salts. No difference in catalytic activity was seen between Rh[W 12 PO 40 ] prepared from chloride, nitrate or AcAc (acetylacetonate) containing Rh salts. H 3 [Mo x W y PO 40 ] acids were prepared by the procedure of J. Bailar, Inorganic Synthesis , 1 , p. 132, (1939) and Na 8 [Rh 2 W 12 O 42 ] was prepared by procedures analogous to Na 8 [Co 2 W 12 O 42 ] as reported by L. Baker and T. McCutcheon, J. Am.Chem. Soc. , 78 , p. 4503, (1956). As illustrated above, the heteropoly acid is impregnated on the support using conventional procedures. The choice of the support is not appreciated to be limiting factor in the operation of the invention. The limited experience with the selection of supports relative to the supports effect on the activity of the catalyst suggests that the support should have a reasonably high surface area IL is preferred that the heteropoly acid be deposited on an inorganic support that has a relatively high surface area, such as a surface area of at least about 100 square meters per gram determined by the BET method. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the surface area of the support onto which the heteropoly acid is deposited, and in contact with, has a surface area of at least about 200 square meter per gram, most preferably at least about 250 square meter per gram. Typical support materials suitable for the invention are the silicas, the gamma-aluminas, the titanias, the alumina silicates, the high surface area clays, and the like. Particularly desirable are the mixed composite supports in which the high surface area support is deposited over a lower surface area support. For example, a silica gel deposited and cured on the surface of an alphaalumina provides the high surface area for the subsequent deposition of the heteropoly acid onto the silica gel coating and the thermal stability provided by the low surface area alpha-alumina. The impregnation step simply involves the coating of the support with the heteropoly acid and then drying the coating on the support to fix it. The drying temperature is not narrowly critical and can range from about 100°C. to about 600°C. for a period of about 5 seconds to about 8 hours. The lower the temperature, the longer will be the heating period and the higher the temperature, the shorter will be the heating period. The most commercially interesting reactants are methanol and dimethyl ether. The products are methyl acetate and acetic acid. The methyl acetate selectivity can be at least 95% at 225°C. and 0.1 MPa (1 atm.) total operating pressure. (5) 2CH 3 OH + CO → CH 3 C(O)OCH 3 + H 2 O (6) CH 3 OCH 3 + CO → CH 3 C(O)OCH 3 In addition, methanol can be carbonylated to acetic acid as shown in Equation 7 below. (7) ROH + CO → RC(O)OH In the case of the carbonylation of methanol, dehydration occurs as a side reaction due to the acidic nature of the heteropoly acid catalysts of the invention. Dehydration results in the formation of dimethylether as shown by equation 8. (8) 2CH 3 OH → CH 3 OCH 3 + H 2 O Since dimethyl ether is carbonylated to methyl acetate (equation 6) it can be recycled back to the reactor with no loss in methanol efficiency. Thus, the feed to the reactor can comprise methanol, dimethyl ether or a combination of both. In the examples which follow, the GHSV = 900 hr 1 and the LHSV = 0.15 hr 1 . The reactor was a clean 6.35 mm (1/4") stainless steel tube packed with glass wool, 2 milliliter of catalyst and additional glass wool. The tube was placed in an aluminum block surrounded by a heater and connected to the feed and exit lines. The CO flow was started, the temperature of the feed/exit lines adjusted to 160°C. and the reactor taken to the desired temperature. At temperature the methanol feed was started and the system was allowed to equilibrate 0.5 hr. Each experiment was normally carried out for 6 hr. The gas stream exiting the reactor was analyzed with a HP 5830 gas chromatograph equipped with a TC detector and a 3m x 3,2 mm (10' x 1/8") column packed with Poropak® Super Q. The following program was used: temp 1 = 50°C., time 1 = 0 min., rate = 15 degrees/min., temp 2 = 225°C., time 2 = 20 min. Examples 1-5 The various MW 12 PO 40 SiO 2 compounds listed in Table 1 below were prepared on a silica support having a surface area of about 683 m 2 /gram according to the procedure described above and examined as catalysts for the carbonylation of methanol. The experiments were carried out at 225°C. and 0.1 MPa (1 atm.) with LHSV = 0.15 hr -1 and GHSV = 900 hr -1 . The results are listed in Table 1. The reported catalyst compositions are idealized stoichiometries. Ex. No. Catalyst Product Yield MeOH DME MeOAc 1 HPdW 12 PO 40 0.0 92.0 8.0 2 HMnW 12 PO 40 0.0 96.0 4.0 3 HCoW 12 PO 40 5.0 92.0 3.0 4 HNiW 12 PO 40 7.0 90.0 3.0 5 HZnW 12 PO 40 0.0 99.0 1.0 Examples 6-10 In these examples, Na 8 [Rh 2 W 12 O 42 ] without deposition on silica support (catalyst "A") and deposited on silica support (catalyst "B") were examined as carbonylation catalysts. The runs were carried out similar to Example 1-5. The results are reported in Table 2 below. Ex. No. Catalyst Temp.°C. Product Yield MeOH DME MeOAc 6 A 225 99.0 0.0 1.0 7 A 250 98.0 0.0 2.0 8 A 275 96.0 0.0 4.0 9 B 225 87.0 0.0 13.0 10 B 275 85 0.0 15.0 Examples 11-14 Heteropoly acids containing both W and Mo were synthesized according to the following reaction: 6Na 2 WO 4 + 6Na 2 MoO 4 + Na 2 HPO 4 + 26HCl → H 3 Wo 6 Mo 6 PO 40 + 26NaCl + 12H 2 O The reaction is general, therefore, H 3 W x Mo y PO 40 , where x + y = 12, were prepared by adjusting the ratios of the reagents. The H 3 W x Mo y PO 40 acids were then exchanged with Rh and deposited onto SiO 2 to give RhW x Mo y PO 40 /SiO 2 catalysts. The catalysts were examined at 225°C, 0,1 MPa (1 atm) CO and GHSV = 900 hr -1 . The results are given in Table 3 below. Catalyst Example No. RhW x Mo y PO 40 MeOAc Yield % x y 11 8 4 16.0 12 6 6 11.0 13 4 8 8.0 14 2 10 4.0 Examples 15-16 In these examples methanol was replaced by dimethyl ether. The reaction was carried out at 225°C. and 0.1 MPa (1 atm.) CO with the catalysts reported in Table 4 below. Each of the catalysts were deposited and supported on high surface area silica, as characterized above. Ex. No. Catalyst Product Yield 2 MeOH 1 DME MeOAc 1 15 HCoW 12 PO 40 1.0 98.0 1.0 16 HNiW 12 PO 40 2.0 96.0 1.0 In the above: 1. "Me" stands for methyl and "Ac" stands for acetate. 2. "Product yield": Unless otherwise noted, the only products observed in the off gas stream were methanol (MeOH), dimethyl ether (DME), and methyl acetate (MeOAc). The product yield for each component is given by Product Yield = P/Combined weight of MeOH + MeOAc + DME where P is is the weight of methanol, methyl acetate or dimethyl ether. Note that this is not product selectivity. Since methanol and dimethyl ether can be recycled back to methyl acetate the selectivity to methyl acetate approaches 100%.

Claims: Solid catalysts, selected from polyoxotungstate compounds which contain a metal selected from Pd, Mn, Co, Ni, Rh and Zn and are of the following formulae: (a) H[MW 12 PO 40 ] in which M is selected from Pd, Mn, Co, Ni and Zn; (b) Na 8 [Rh 2 W 12 O 42 ] (c) RhW x MO y PO 40 wherein the combinations x/y are selected from 8/4, 6/6, 4/8 and 2/10. The catalyst of claim 1 wherein the polyoxotungstate compound is deposited on a support that is inert to the reaction. The catalyst of claim 2 wherein the support is silica. The catalyst of claim 3 wherein the surface area of the silica is at least 100 square meter per gram. The catalyst of claim 2 wherein the support is selected from silicas, the gamma-aluminas, the titanias, the alumina silicates, and the high surface area clays. The catalyst of claim 2 wherein the support is a mixed composite support in which a high surface area support is deposited over a lower surface area support.

Inventors: WEGMAN RICHARD WILLIAM, WEGMAN, RICHARD WILLIAM
Applicants: UNION CARBIDE CHEM PLASTIC, UNION CARBIDE CHEMICALS AND PLASTICS COMPANY, INC.
Application year: 1989
Main classification: C07C67
IPC codes: C07C67, B01J23, C07C51, B01J27