High strength high chromium cast iron and valve rocker arm made thereof

Abstract: A high strength high chromium cast iron contains fine particle precipitated hard carbide. The precipitated hard carbide has an average particle size of 20 µm or less, in a martensite matrix with a hardness of Hv 500 or more, and has area ratio of from 30% to 45%. The precipitated hard carbide has a spheroidal ratio (surface area of sphere circumscribing the precipitated hard carbide versus actual surface area of precipitated hard carbide) of 40% or more. The preferred composition (wt%) is C 2.5-3.7; Si 1.0-2.0; Mn 0.5-1.0; Cr 15-20; Ni 0.3-0.7; P at most 0.3; S at most 0.1; optionally one or more of W, Mo, V, Nb, Ta, Ti, and B (total 3-10); rest Fe and impurities.

Description: The present invention relates to a valve rocker arm for an internal combustion engine of an automotive vehicle, which is made of a high strength high chromium cast iron In an automotive internal combustion engine, a valve drive mechanism is provided for driving intake valves and exhaust valves in synchronism with engine revolution. The valve drive mechanism generally comprises a camshaft and a cam follower which convert rotation of the camshaft into a reciprocating motion for axially driving the intake and exhaust valves. The cam follower comprises a valve rocker arms adapted to be driven by cams carried by the camshaft. The rocker arm is formed of aluminium alloy or high chromium cast iron. In case of aluminium alloy, the rocker arm is formed by die-casting. On the other hand, in case of high chromium cast iron, the rocker arm is formed by integral casting. According to advancing of automotive technologies for higher performance engine, requirement for compact and light weight engine with long life and maintenance free construction increases. One example of high chromium cast iron rocker arm has been disclosed in Japanese Patent First (unexamined) Publication (Tokkai) Showa 56-84442. In this Japanese Patent First Publication, ferrochromium alloy used for high chromium cast, is composed of Cr, C, Si, Mn and so forth. In the disclosure, the ferrochromium alloy contains about 30 Wt% of Cr with 9 to 13 of Cr/C composition ratio and with greater than or equal to 15 of Cr/C/S composition ratio. More specifically, the disclosed composition of the ferrochromium allow is as follow: C 2.4 - 3.2 wt% Si 0.5 - 1.0 wt% Mn less than 1.0 wt% Cr 25 - 35 wt% The high chromium cast iron randomly forms needle structure carbide precipitated on the surface which contacts with cam of a camshaft, which is made of chilled cast iron, valve shaft of intake and exhaust valve, pivot and so forth. Furthermore, the high chromium cast iron contains martensite base matrix, in which residual austenite or ferrite is distributed. Such structure of cast iron can cause substantial wearing of the associated components, such as cam, valve shaft, pivot and so forth. On the other hand, the valve rocker arm per se can cause severe scuffing wearing. Therefore, it is an object of the invention to provide a high chromium cast iron which can reduce wearing at both of the rocker arm per se and associated components, such as cam, valve shaft, pivot and so forth. The present invention provides as set out in claim 1 a rocker arm for an internal combustion engine for an automotive vehicle, the rocker arm being made of high chromium cast iron comprising fine particle precipitated hard carbide, characterised in that the high chromium cast iron contains: C 2.5 - 3.7 wt% Si 1.0 - 2.0 wt% Mn 0.5 - 1.0 wt% Cr 15 - 20 wt% Ni 0.3 - 0.7 wt% P present up to 0.3 wt% S present up to 0.1 wt% optionally up to 10 wt% of one or more elements selected from W, Mo, V, Nb, Ta, Ti and B, Fe remainder and inevitable impurities, and the said precipicated hard carbide has an average particle size of 20 µm or less, an area ratio in a range from 30% to 45%, and a spheroidal ratio of 40% or more, in a martensite base matrix of a hardness of Hv 500 or more, obtained by hardening and tempering of the cast iron. Preferred embodiments of the rocker arm according to claim 1 are given in the dependent claims 2 to 6. If desired, the material of the high chromium cast iron may further contain one or more of the materials selected among W, Mo, V, Nb, Ta, Ti and B. In such case, it is preferable that the overall composition of these selected one or two materials is in a range of 3 to 10 Wt%. The present invention will be understood more fully from the detailed discussion given here below and from the examples given here below, which, however, should not be taken to limit the invention to the specific exemplified compositions, but are for demonstration, explanation, and understanding only. In the drawings: Fig. 1 is a graph showing results of endurance test performed for examples Nos. 1 to 6 and comparative examples 7 to 13; Figs. 2 to 5 are photomicrographs showing structure of comparative examples No. 7, 10, and 12 and example No. 4. As set forth above, the present invention makes use of high chromium cast iron containing fine particle precipitated hard carbide. The precipitated hard carbide has an average particle size of 20 µm or less, with a hardness of Hv 500 or more in the martensite base matrix, and has an area ratio in the range from 30% to 45%. The precipitated hard carbide has a spheroidal ratio (surface area of sphere circumscribing the precipitated hard carbide versus actual surface area of precipitated hard carbide) of 40% or more. Furthermore, the invention further provides a valve rocker arm of a valve drive mechanism of an internal combustion engine of an automotive vehicle. If the average particle size of the hard carbide is greater than 20 µm, drop out of the precipitated hard carbide can be caused or substantial wearing of the associated component, such as cam, made of chilled cast iron, valve shaft, pivot and so forth. Therefore, it is not desirable to make the average particle size greater than 20 µm. On the other hand, if the hardness of martensite base matrix is lower than Hv 500, scuffing wearing can be easily caused to promote wearing not only on the rocker arm but also on the cam, valve shaft, pivot and so forth. On the other hand, if the area ratio of the precipitated hard carbide is less than 30%, uniformity of distribution of the hard carbide is destroyed, causing local wearing in the associated components and thus promoting greater magnitude of wearing. On the other hand, if the area surface of the hard carbide comes greater than 45%, toughness or strength of the rocker arm is lowered. Furthermore, such too hard rocker arm may attack the associated components. Therefore, the area ratio of the hard carbide is to be 30% or more, but not greater than 45%. In addition, if the spheroidal ratio is less than 40%, the needle hard carbide structure is increased to attack against the material of the associated components to promote greater magnitude of wearing. In order to achieve the property of the high chromium cast iron, the composition of the material is as follows: C 2.5 - 3.7 Wt% Si 1.0 - 2.0 Wt% Mn 0.5 - 1.0 Wt% Cr 15 - 20 Wt% Ni 0.3 - 0.7 Wt% P at most 0.3 Wt% S at most 0.1 Wt% optionally up to 10 wt% of one or more elements selected from W, Mo, Nb, V, Ta, Ti and B, Fe remainder and inevitable impurities. As already indicated the composition may further include one or two or more of the materials selected among W, Mo, V, Nb, Ta, Ti and B. The overall content of these selected one or two or more materials is in a range of 3 to 10 Wt%. C is a material effective for improving wear resistance of the cast iron, in a form of the rocker arm. When too small an amount of C is contained, the area ratio of the precipitated hard carbide becomes smaller than 30%, making the wear resistance of the rocker arm per se unacceptably low. This results in causing wearing of the associated components. In view of this, the content of C should be greater than or equal to 2. 5 Wt%. Contrary to this, when the content of B becomes excessive, the area ratio of the hard carbide to be precipitated becomes greater than 45%, causing lowering of toughness or strength. In view of this, the C content is limited at 3.7 Wt%. If the Si content is less than 1 Wt%, the melting temperature of the molten iron becomes unacceptably high, causing misrun in casting. On the other hand, when the Si content is greater than 2.0 Wt%, the excess amount of Si may prevent the hard carbide from being precipitated and precipitate graphite to cause lowering of wear resistance. In view of these, the preferred range of Si content is set in a range of 1.0 to 2.0 Wt%. Part of the Mn serves for forming carbide and another part serves for forming solid solution for promoting formation of pearlite and improving hardenability. When the content of Mn is less than 0.5 Wt%, the effect of Mn cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if the content of Mn becomes greater than 1.0 Wt%, too much amount of carbide is precipitate for lowering of toughness. For instance, in case that the base matrix is martensite, too much amount of carbide may cause temper brittleness. Therefore, preferred range of Mn content is within a range of 0.5 to 1.0 Wt%. Cr is effective for formation of various carbide and is further effective for forming high density oxide layer on the rocker arm surface for improving corrosion resistance and wear resistance of the rocker arm. If the Cr content is too small, the precipitated hard carbide (Fe, Cr)₇C₃, becomes unacceptably small to make distribution of the hard carbide become uneven or non-uniform. This results in lack of wear resistance of the rocker arm and thus causes wearing in the associated components. Therefore, the preferred content of the Cr is greater than/equal to 15 Wt%. On the other hand, when excess amount of Cr is contained, austenite or ferrite remains in the martensite base matrix for causing severe scuffing not only in the rocker arm per se and the associated components, such as cam, valve shaft, pivot and so forth. In order to avoid this, the content of Cr is less than or equal to 20 Wt%. Ni is effective for improving toughness and hardenability. If the Ni content is too small, effect of improving toughness cannot be obtained. In order to obtain satisfactory toughness, Ni has to be contained in the content greater than or equal to 0.3 Wt%. On the other hand, if excess amount of Ni is contained, austenite in the martensite base material causes wearing. Therefore, the preferred content of Ni is less than or equal to 0.7 Wt%. P resides in the case iron structure in a form of hard steadite (Fe-Fe₃C-Fe₃P) and improves wear resistance of the rocker arm. When the P content becomes in excess of 0.3 Wt%, Fe₃C in the steadite is increased to make the cast block hard and brittle. Therefore, it is preferred to maintain the content of P less than or equal to 0.3 Wt%. Also, S is preferred to be contained in an amount of less than or equal to 0.1 Wt%. In addition, W, Mo, V, Nb, Ta, Ti, and B can be added for forming hard carbide and thus improve wear resistance. Furthermore, these materials are effective for increasing the spheroidal ratio for reducing property of attacking against the associated component. Therefore, selected one or two of these materials can be added in an amount of 3 Wt%. However, when such material has a property of lowering the toughness of the cast block as the rocker arm if excess amount if added. Therefore, the preferable content of the additive material is not more than 10 Wt%. Utilizing the material composition, high chromium cast iron is cast by way of integral casting. After casting, the cast block is subjected to hardening and tempering so that the hardness Hv of the martensite base matrix is higher than or equal to 500. Subsequently, the cast block is further processed by machining for improving adhering resistance. In order to confirm the improved property of the high chromium cast iron according to the invention, experiments were performed in terms of various examples. Furthermore, in order to compare with the results obtained from the examples, additional experiments were performed in terms of various comparative examples. Discussion concerning each example and comparative example will be given herebelow. EXAMPLES In each experiment, the molten iron has a chemical composition as shown in the appended table I. The molten iron was respectively processed by precision casting for forming rocker arm cast block. For the examples Nos. 1 through 6 and the comparative examples Nos. 8 through 10, 12, and 13, heat treatment, i.e. hardening and tempering process, was performed. For the comparative examples Nos. 7 and 11, heat treatment was not performed. Subsequently, all of the examples and comparative examples underwent a machining process to be finished into a desired configuration of rocker arm. For respective samples of all examples and comparative examples, amount of precipitated hard carbide, particle size, and spheroidal ratio were measured. Furthermore, the structure and hardness of the base matrix were also checked for respective samples. The results are listed on the table I. Furthermore, by installing respective sample rocker arms of respective examples and comparative examples, an endurance test was performed. The endurance test was performed in the condition set out in the appended table II. After the endurance test, depth of wearing in the rocker arm and the cam nose (as the associated component) was measured. The result of the measurement is illustrated in Fig. 1. As can be seen from the table I and Fig. 1, since the comparative example No. 7 has high Cr , residual austenite is contained in martensite base matrix. Furthermore, since the comparative examine No. 7 is not given heat treatment, hardness of the martensite base material is low. In addition, since the comparative example No. 7 does not contain W, Mo or so forth, spheroidal ratio of the precipitated carbide is substantially low. Furthermore, the particle size of the precipitated carbide is relatively large. In the comparative example, severe scuffing was observed on both of the rocker arm and the cam nose. From this, it was found that wear resistance of the comparative example is insufficient. For the comparative example, the structure in the section was observed. A photomicrograph of the section of the comparative example No. 7 is shown in Fig. 2. In Fig. 2, the white block is carbide. As can be seen, the white carbide is in a needle form structure. In the photomicrograph, gray section is residual austenite. As can be clearly seen from Fig. 2, since the comparative example No. 7 contains more than 20 Wt% of Cr, austenite and ferrite reside in the martensite base matrix, which has relatively low hardness. For this reason, it can be appreciated that the comparative example No. 7 easily causes scuffing wearing. On the other hand, without carbide of W, Mo or so forth, the precipitated carbide (Fe, Cr)₇C₃, (Fe, Cr)₂₃C₆ is in a structure of needle and has a large particle size. Because of the large particle size and the low spheroidal ratio, the cam nose as associated component and made of chilled casting was seriously attacked to cause a great magnitude of wearing. The comparative example No. 8 is different to the comparative example No. 7 only in the heat treatment in preparation. Since the comparative example No. 8 has martensite base matrix having higher hardness than that of the comparative example No. 7, wearing magnitude is smaller than that of the comparative example No. 7. However, since residual austenite is present in the martensite base matrix, the particle size of the precipitated carbide is relatively large and the spheroidal ratio is relatively low, scuffing wearing is observed. Therefore, even in the comparative example 8, because of presence of residual austenite after heat treatment, due to a Cr content greater than 20 Wt%, scuffing is caused. Furthermore, since the structure of the carbide is a needle structure similarly to that of the comparative example No. 7, it attacks the associated component, i.e. cam nose, thereby causing substantial wearing. The comparative example No. 9 also contains more than 20 Wt% of Cr. Therefore, the martensite base matrix still contains residual austenite. In this comparative example No. 9, severe scuffing was observed. This comparative example No. 9 contains W and Mo in chemical composition. Therefore, the precipitated carbide (Fe,Cr)₇ C₃, (Fe, Cr)₂₃ C₆, has a higher spheroidal ratio and a smaller particle size in comparison with that of the comparative examples Nos. 7 and 8. Therefore, wearing on the cam nose was much smaller than in the foregoing comparative examples 7 and 8. The comparative example No. 10 has a Cr content of less than 15 Wt%. As a result, a smaller amount of carbide (Fe, Cr)₇ C₃ is precipitated. A section of the comparative example No. 10 is shown in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3, the white block is carbide, the gray section is martensite matrix. As can be seen, the density of the precipitated carbide is relatively low. As a result, the wear resistance of the rocker arm becomes insufficient. Due to occurrence of wearing at the rocker arm, the associated component was also worn. The comparative example No. 11 was prepared by directly performing a machining process for the rocker arm cast block without performing a heat treatment. Therefore, this rocker arm is insufficient in hardness. Also, the martensite base matrix has a low hardness. Therefore, this comparative example No. 11 shows a low adhering resistance. Furthermore, this comparative example is easy to cause scuffing. The comparative example No. 12 contains too small an amount of W, Mo or so forth. The section is shown in a form of the microphotograph in Fig. 4. In Fig. 4, the white block is carbide and the black section is the martensite matrix. The spheroidal ratio of this comparative example 12 was 25% and it substantially is in a needle structure. Therefore, though wearing magnitude of the rocker arm is relatively small, great magnitude of wearing was caused in the associated cam nose. The comparative example No. 13 contains small a amount of C. Therefore, the area ratio of precipitated carbide is 27%. This makes the wear resistance of the rocker arm unacceptable low. In contrast to these comparative examples, the examples Nos. 1 through 6 show good and satisfactory wear resistance. Fig. 5 shows the microphotograph of example No. 4. In the structure shown in Fig. 5, the average particle size of the precipitated carbide was 16 µm. The area ratio of the carbide was 37% and the hardness Hv of the martensite base material was 738. This shows a substantially small magnitude of wearing as shown in the table I and thus exhibits a satisfactorily high wear resistance. Therefore, the present invention fulfills all of the objects and advantages sought for.

Claims: A rocker arm for an internal combustion engine for an automotive vehicle, the rocker arm being made of high chromium cast iron comprising fine particle precipitated hard carbide, characterised in that the high chromium cast iron contains: C 2.5 - 3.7 wt% Si 1.0 - 2.0 wt% Mn 0.5 - 1.0 wt% Cr 15 - 20 wt% Ni 0.3 - 0.7 wt% P present up to 0.3 wt% S present up to 0.1 wt% optionally up to 10 wt% of one or more elements selected from W, Mo, V, Nb, Ta, Ti and B, Fe remainder and inevitable impurities, the said precipitated hard carbide has an average particle size of 20 µm or less, an area ratio in a range from 30% to 45%, and a spheroidal ratio of 40% or more, in a martensite base matrix of a hardness of Hv 500 or more, obtained by hardening and tempering of the cast iron. A rocker arm as claimed in claim 1, containing one or more components selected from W, Mo, V, Nb, Ta, Ti, and B. A rocker arm as claimed in claim 2, wherein the overall amount of the selected one or more components is 3 to 10 wt%. A rocker arm as claimed in claim 2 or 3, wherein the said one component is W. A rocker arm as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein less than 0.3 wt% P is present. A rocker arm as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein less than 0.1 wt% S is present.

Inventors: KANO MAKOTO, KAWAMURA OSAMU, TAKAHASHI TERUO, TANIMOTO ICHIRO, KANO, MAKOTO, KAWAMURA, OSAMU, TAKAHASHI, TERUO, TANIMOTO, ICHIRO
Applicants: NIPPON PISTON RING CO LTD, NISSAN MOTOR, NIPPON PISTON RING CO., LTD., NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD.
Application year: 1989
Main classification: C22C37
IPC codes: C22C37, F16H53, F01L1, F02B1