FLUOROALKOXY AMINO TRIAZINES FOR CONTROL OF WEEDS IN SUGAR BEETS

Abstract: Compounds of the formula wherein R is C₁-C₄ alkyl, CH₂CH=CH₂, CH₂C≡CH, cyclopropylmethyl or CH₂CH₂R₂; R₁ is C₁-C₂ alkyl, C₁-C₂ haloalkyl, CH₂CN, CH₂OCH₃, C₁-C₃ alkoxy, C₁-C₃ alkylthio, phenylthio or NR₃R₄; R₂ is C₁-C₂ alkoxy, C₁-C₂ alkylthio, CN or halogen; R₃ and R₄ are independently H or CH₃; and X is NHCH₃, N(CH₃)₂ or N(CH₃)OCH₃; provided that when R₁ is OCH₂CH₃ or CH₂OCH₃, then R is other than CH₃; and their agriculturally suitable salts. exhibit herbicidal activity. They have particular utility for the selective control of weeds in beet.

Description: Background of the Invention U.S. Patent 4,744,816, issued May 17, 1988, and EP-A-164,269, published on December 11, 1985, disclose herbicidal sulfonylureas of the formula wherein R₁ is, inter alia , CO₂R₁₀, etc.; R₂ is H, F, Cl, Br, CF₃, CH₃, C₂H₅, OCH₃, OC₂H₅, SCH₃ or SC₂H₅; R₁₀ is C₁-C₄ alkyl, CH₂CH₂OCH₃, CH₂CH₂Cl, CH₂CH=CH₂ or CH₂C≡CH; R₁₄ is H or C₁-C₂ alkyl; R₁₅ is C₁-C₂ alkyl, OCH₃, OC₂H₅ or CH₂CN; X is NR₁₄R₁₅; Y is OCH₂CH₂F, OCH₂CHF₂ or OCH₂CF₃; and Z is CH or N. South African Application No. 84/2245, published 9/28/84, discloses herbicidal sulfonylureas of the formula wherein A is C₁-C₆ haloalkyl Z is O or S; E is CH or N; R₁ is, inter alia , H, COR₆ etc.; R₂ is, inter alia , H, etc.; R₃ and R₄ are independently H, halogen, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₂-C₄ haloalkoxy, NR₁₂R₁₃, etc.; R₆ is, inter alia , C₁-C₄ alkoxy, C₁-C₄ haloalkoxy, C₂-C₆ alkoxyalkoxy, etc.; and R₁₂ and R₁₃ are independently H or C₁-C₄ alkyl. While these two references generically disclose some of the compounds of the instant invention, there is no specific mention of the instant compounds or their utility in sugar beets. U.S. Patent 4,618,363 discloses herbicidal sulfonylureas of the formula wherein R₁ is H, halogen, NO₂, C₁-C₄ haloalkyl, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, C₂-C₅ alkenyl or C₁-C₄ alkoxycarbonyl; X is O, S, -SO- or SO₂; m is 0 or 1; Q is, inter alia , R₁₃, etc.; R₁₃ is phenyl or phenyl substituted by halogen, NO₂, CN, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, C₁-C₄ alkylthio, C₂-C₅ alkenyl, C₁-C₄ haloalkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxycarbonyl, -NR₄₅R₄₆, -SO₃H or -SO₂NR₄₇R₄₈; R₂ is C₁-C₃ alkyl or C₁-C₃ alkoxy, each unsubstituted by 1 to 3 halogen atoms; R₃ is, inter alia , -NR₄R₅, etc.; and E is N or CH. While this reference generically discloses some of the compounds of the instant invention, there is no specific mention of the instant compounds of their utility in sugar beets. Summary of the Invention This invention comprises novel compounds of Formula I, agriculturally suitable compositions containing them, and their method-of-use as preemergence and/or postemergence herbicides or plant growth regulants. wherein R is C₁-C₄ alkyl, CH₂CH=CH₂, CH₂C≡CH, cyclopropylmethyl or CH₂CH₂R₂; R₁ is C₁-C₂ alkyl, C₁-C₂ haloalkyl, CH₂CN, CH₂OCH₃, C₁-C₃ alkoxy, C₁-C₃ alkylthio, phenylthio or NR₃R₄; R₂ is C₁-C₂ alkoxy, C₁-C₂ alkylthio, CN or halogen; R₃ and R₄ are independently H or CH₃; and X is NHCH₃, N(CH₃)₂ or N(CH₃)OCH₃; provided that when R₁ is OCH₂CH₃ or CH₂OCH₃, then R is other than CH₃; and their agriculturally suitable salts. In the above definitions, the term "alkyl" includes straight chain or branched alkyl, e.g., methyl, ethyl, n -propyl, isopropyl or the different butyl isomers. Alkoxy includes methoxy and ethoxy. Alkylthio includes methylthio and ethylthio. The term "halogen," either alone or in compound words such as "haloalkyl," means fluorine, chlorine, bromine or iodine. Further, when used in compound words such as "haloalkyl" said alkyl may be partially or fully substituted with halogen atoms, which may be the same or different. Examples of haloalkyl include CF₃, CH₂CH₂F, CF₂CF₃ and CH₂CHFCl. The total number of carbon atoms in a substituent group is indicated by the C i -C j prefix where i and j are numbers from 1 to 4. For example, C₁-C₄ alkyl would designate methyl, ethyl and the different propyl and butyl isomers; C₁-C₂ alkylthio would designate methylthio and ethylthio; C₁-C₂ alkoxy would designate methoxy and ethoxy. Preferred for reasons for their higher herbicidal activity, greater safety to sugar beets and/or more favorable ease of synthesis are: 1. Compounds of Formula I wherein R is C₁-C₄ alkyl; R₁ is C₁-C₂ alkyl; and X is NHCH₃ or N(CH₃)₂. 2. Compounds of Formula I wherein R is C₁-C₄ alkyl; R₁ is C₁-C₂ haloalkyl; and X is NHCH₃ or N(CH₃)₂. 3. Compounds of Preferred 1 wherein R is C₁-C₃ alkyl; and X is NHCH₃. 4. Compounds of Preferred 1 wherein R is C₁-C₃ alkyl; and X is N(CH₃)₂. Specifically preferred for reasons of highest herbicidal activity, greatest safety to sugar beets and/or most favorable ease of synthesis are: Ethyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate, melting point 134-142°C; and Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate, melting point 150-160°C. Detailed Description of the Invention Synthesis The following discussion represents a general outline for the preparation of the compounds of this invention. All of the syntheses described below are multistep with one or more methods being taught for each step. This allows for a wide variety of possible synthetic pathways to prepare a particular compound of Formula I. The proper choice of the synthetic pathway and the best ordering of the reaction sequences for each individual will be known to one skilled in the art. The compounds of Formula I can be prepared by the methods shown in Equations 1 and 2. As shown in Equation 1, many of the compounds of Formula I can be prepared by reacting a silyl sulfonamide of Formula II with a heterocyclic carbamate of Formula III. The reaction is carried out at 0° to 50°C in a solvent such as acetonitrile, dioxane, or tetrahydrofuran in the presence of a fluoride ion source such as cesium fluoride or tetrabutylammonium fluoride for 0.1 to 2 hours. Alternatively, some of the sulfonamides of Formula IV can be prepared and reacted with heterocyclic carbamates of Formula III to give compounds of Formula I as shown in Equation 2. The reaction is carried out at 0° to 50°C in a solvent such as acetonitrile, dioxane, or tetrahydrofuran in the presence of a non-nucleophilic base such as DBU for 0.2 to 2 hours. Many of the silyl sulfonamides of Formula II can be prepared by reacting sulfonyl chlorides of Formula V with t-butyldimethylsilylamine (J. R. Bowser, et al., Inorganic Chemistry , 17 , 1882 (1978)) as shown in Equation 3. The reaction is carried out at 0° to 30°C in a solvent such as dichloromethane in the presence of 1 to 2 equivalents of the amine and 1 equivalent of sodium bicarbonate. Alternatively, many silyl sulfonamides of Formula II can be prepared by reacting silylsulfonamides of Formula VI with alkyl chloroformates as shown in Equation 4. The reaction is carried out by contacting suitable silyl sulfonamides of Formula VI with an organolithium reagent such as n-butyllithium in an inert aprotic solvent such as tetrahydrofuran at -78° to 0°C for 0.5 to 3 hours. The dilithio-intermediate VIa is then reacted with an alkyl orthoformate at -78° to 0°C for 0.5 to 5 hours. Silylsulfonamides II are isolated by standard methods which are well known to one skilled in the art. Many silyl sulfonamides of Formula II can be prepared by the indirect route shown in Equation 5. The first two steps are done as described above for Equation 4. J. G. Lombardino ( J. Org. Chem. , 36 , 1843 (1971)) also describes methods for preparing acid intermediate which are similar to acids of Formula VII. Methods to esterify acids under mild conditions are well known in the art. Many sulfonamides of Formula IV can be prepared by deprotecting t-butylsulfonamides of Formula IIa as in Equation 6. The reaction is carried out at -78° to 30°C in an inert solvent such as hexane in the presence of an acid such as trifluoroacetic acid. The success of this reaction depends on the nature of R₁ and R and will be known to one skilled in the art. Sulfonamides of Formula IIa can be prepared by methods similar to those described in Equations 3, 4 and 5 in which the t-butyldimethylsilyl moiety has been replaced by the t-butyl moiety. The sulfonyl chlorides of Formula V can be prepared by oxidatively chlorinating the corresponding sulfur-containing compounds of Formula VIII as shown in Equation 7. R′ is H, alkyl, benzyl or carbamoyl. The reaction of Equation 7 is carried out by contacting compounds of Formula VIII in a solvent such as acetic acid or proprionic acid with at least 3.0 equivalents of chlorine in the presence of at least 2.5 equivalents of water at about -20° to 30°C for 0.2 to 5 hours. A. Wagenaar teaches specific reaction conditions for related compounds in Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 101 , 91 (1982). Alternatively, reaction of compounds of Formula VIII, wherein R′ is H or benzyl, with a hypochlorite solution such as 5% NaOCl can provide sulfonyl chlorides of Formula V. Reaction conditions for similar reactions are described in South African Patent Application No. 84/8845 and EP-A-142,152. As shown in Equation 8, many of the sulfonyl chlorides of Formula V can be prepared from the corresponding amines of Formula IX by a Meerwein reaction. The reaction involves diazotization of the amine IX with sodium nitrite in aqueous HCl, followed by reaction of the diazonium salt with sulfur dioxide and cupric chloride in acetic acid analogous to the teachings of Yale and Sowinski, J. Org., Chem. , 25 , 1824 (1960). Alternatively, sulfonyl chlorides of Formula V can be prepared by a modification of the above procedure as shown in Equation 9. The amine hydrochloride salts IXa are diazotized with an alkyl nitrite in an organic solvent, such as acetonitrile or acetone, and the resulting diazonium salts are reacted with sulfur dioxide and cupric chloride to give sulfonyl chlorides. V. M. Doyle, in J. Org. Chem. , 42 , 2426, 2431 (1977), describes conditions for doing similar Meerwein reactions. The heterocyclic carbamates of Formula III in Equations 1 and 2 can be prepared by methods described in U.S. 4,744,816. The preparation of compounds of this invention is further illustrated by the following examples. Example 1 3-Methyl-2-(phenylmethylthio)-benzoic acid, 1-methylethyl ester To a stirred suspension of dry tetrahydrofuran (125 mL) and 35% potassium hydride in oil (6.3 g) was slowly added benzyl mercaptan (6.1 mL) at 0°C under an inert atmosphere. After 15 minutes, 3-methyl-2-nitrobenzoic acid, 1-methylethyl ester (11.23 g) was added and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was partitioned between 6N sodium hydroxide (25 mL) and ethyl acetate (150 mL). The organic phase was dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered, concentrated, and chromatographed on silica gel eluted with 5% ethyl acetate in hexanes to give 13.7 g of the title compound as a yellow oil, n D 1.5642. 90 MHz NMR (CDCl₃) δ 1.39 (d, 6H, CH₃); 2.39 (s, 3H, CH₃); 3.99 (s, 2H, CH₂); 5.32 (m, 1H, CH); and 7.26 (m, 8H, arom.) IR (neat) 1720 cm⁻¹. Example 2 Methyl-2-(chlorosulfonyl)-3-methylbenzoate To a stirred suspension of methyl 3-methyl-2-(phenylmethylthio)-benzoate (24 g), dichloromethane (700 mL), water (150 mL), and concentrated hydrochloric acid (34 mL), kept at 0°C, was slowly added 5% sodium hypochlorite (450 mL). The resulting yellow suspension was stirred at 0°C for 1 hour. The dichloromethane phase was dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered, concentrated, and triturated with chlorobutane-hexanes to give 14 g of the title compound as a white solid, m.p. 114-116°C. 90 MHz NMR (CDCl₃) δ 2.82 (s, 3H, CH₃); 3.97(s, 3H, OCH₃); and 7.5 (m, 3H, arom.) IR (nujol) 1730, 1360, and 1175 cm⁻¹. Example 3 Ethyl 2-[((-dimethyl)-(1,1-dimethylethyl)silylamino)-sulfonyl]-3-nitrobenzoate A suspension of ethyl 2-(chlorosulfonyl)-3-nitrobenzoate (14.7 g), amino-t-butyldimethylsilane (15.4 g), and sodium bicarbonate (3.5 g) in dichloromethane (300 mL) was stirred at room temperature in a stoppered flask for 4 days. Water (90 mL) and saturated aqueous bicarbonate (45 mL) were added, and the mixture was stirred. The dichloromethane phase was dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered, concentrated, and chromatographed on silica gel eluted with 20% ethyl acetate in hexanes to give 12.9 g of the title compound as a white solid, m.p. 101-102°C. 90 MHz NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.30 (s, 6H, SiCH₃); 0.97 (s, 9H, CH₃); 1.41 (t, 3H, CH₃); 4.48 (q, 2H, OCH₂); 5.86 (s, 1H, NH); and 7.7 (m, 3H, arom.). IR (nujol) 3200, 1730 and 1700 cm⁻¹. Example 4 Methyl 2-[((dimethyl)-1,1-dimethylethyl)silylamino)sulfonyl]-3-trifluoromethylbenzoate A solution of N-[(dimethyl)-(1,1-dimethylethyl)silyl]-2-trifluoromethylbenzenesulfonamide (17.5 g) in dry tetrahydrofuran (250 mL) was contacted with 2.5 M butyllithium (46 mL) at 50°C and allowed to warm to 0°C over 1.5 hours under an inert atmosphere. The mixture was cooled to -78°C and added to a solution of methyl chloroformate in dry tetrahydrofuran (300 mL) at -78°C. The mixture was stirred at -78°C under an inert atmosphere for 1.5 hours and then quenched with saturated aqueous ammonium chloride (100 mL). After warming a 0°C, the tetrahydrofuran layer was dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered evaporated and chromatographed on silica gel eluted with 20% chlorobutane, 10% tetrahydrofuran and 70% hexanes to give 2.13 g of the title compound as a white solid. m.p. 80-84°C. 90 MHz NMR (CDCl₃) δ 0.29 (s, 6H, SiCH₃); 0.96 (s, 9H, CH₃); 4.02 (s, 3H, OCH₃); 5.63 (s, 1H, NH); 7.8 (m, 2H, arom.); and 8 (m, 1H, arom.). IR (nujol) 3250, 1725 cm⁻¹. Example 5 Ethyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate A solution of 2-(dimethyl-(1,1-dimethylethyl)silylamino)-3-methylbenzoic acid, ethyl ester (0.36 g) and O-phenyl-N-[4-dimethylamino-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]carbamate (0.39 g) in acetonitrile (10 mL) was treated with 1M tetrabutylammonium fluoride in tetrahydrofuran (1.1 mL). The mixture was stirred for 2 hours. After diluting the reaction with water (20 mL) and acidifying with 1N hydrochloric acid, the resulting precipitate was filtered, washed with water and hexane/ether, and air dried to give 0.28 g of the title compound as a white solid, m.p. 134-142°C. 200 MHz NMR (CDCl₃) δ 1.38 (t, 3H, CH₃); 2.89 (s, 3H, CH₃); 3.24 (s, 6H, NCH₃); 4.36 (q, 2H, OCH₂); 4.74 (q, 2H, CH₂); 7.4 (m, 4H, arom. and NH); and 12.38 (s, 1H, NH). IR (nujol) 1710, 1695 cm⁻¹. Example 6 Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate A solution of methyl 2-(dimethyl-(1,1-dimethyl ethyl)silylamino)-3-methylbenzoate (0.68 g) and O-phenyl-N-[4-dimethylamino-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]carbamate (0.79 g) in tetrahydrofuran (10 mL) was treated with 1M tetrabutylammonium fluoride in tetrahydrofuran (2.2 mL). The mixture was stirred for 1 hour. After diluting the reaction with water (30 mL) and acidifying with 1N hydrochloric acid, the resulting precipitate was filtered, washed with water and chlorobutane/hexane, and air dried to give 0.58 g of the title compound as a white solid, m.p. 151-159°C. with decomposition. Another sample previously prepared by this method melted at 150-160°C with decomposition. 300 MHz NMR (DMSO) δ 3.04 (s, 3H, CH₃); 3.46 (s, 6H, NCH₃); 4.10 (s, 3H, OCH₃); 5.32 (m, 2H, CH₂); 7.78 (d, 1H, arom.); 7.84 (d, 1H, arom.); 7.98 (m, 1H, arom.); 11.1 (s, 1H, NH); and 13.1 (s, 1H, NH). IR (nujol) 1730 cm⁻¹. The following compounds may be prepared by one skilled in the art using the general methods described earlier and exemplified in Examples 1 to 6. Formulations Useful formulations of the compounds of Formula I can be prepared in conventional ways. They include dusts, granules, pellets, solutions, suspensions, emulsions, wettable powders, emulsifiable concentrates and the like. Many of these may be applied directly. Sprayable formulations can be extended in suitable media and used at spray volumes of from a few liters to several hundred liters per hectare. High strength compositions are primarily used as intermediates for further formulation. The formulations, broadly, contain about 0.1% to 99% by weight of active ingredient(s) and at least one of (a) about 0.1% to 20% surfactant(s) and (b) about 1% to 99.9% solid or liquid inert diluent(s). More specifically, they will contain these ingredients in the following approximate proportions: Active Ingredient Weight Percent Diluent(s) Surfactant(s) Wettable Powders 20-90 0-74 1-10 Oil Suspensions, Emulsions, Solutions, (including Emulsifiable Concentrates) 3-50 40-95 0-15 Aqueous Suspension 10-50 40-84 1-20 Dusts 1-25 70-99 0-5 Granules and Peletts 0.1-95 5-99.9 0-15 High Strength Compositions 90-99 0-10 0-2 Lower or higher levels of active ingredient can, of course, be present depending on the intended use and the physical properties of the compound. Higher ratios of surfactant to active ingredient are sometimes desirable, and are achieved by incorporation into the formulation or by tank mixing. Typical solid diluents are described in Watkins, et al., "Handbook of Insecticide Dust Diluents and Carriers", 2nd Ed., Dorland Books, Caldwell, New Jersey, but other solids, either mined or manufactured, may be used. The more absorptive diluents are preferred for wettable powders and the denser ones for dusts. Typical liquid diluents and solvents are described in Marsden, "Solvents Guide," 2nd Ed., Interscience, New York, 1950. Solubility under 0.1% is preferred for suspension concentrates; solution concentrates are preferably stable against phase separation at 0°C. "McCutcheon's Detergents and Emulsifiers Annual", MC Publishing Corp., Ridgewood, New Jersey, as well as Sisely and Wood, "Encyclopedia of Surface Active Agents", Chemical Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1964, list surfactants and recommended uses. All formulations can contain minor amounts of additives to reduce foaming, caking, corrosion, microbiological growth, etc. The methods of making such compositions are well known. Solutions are prepared by simply mixing the ingredients. Fine solid compositions are made by blending and, usually, grinding as in a hammer or fluid energy mill. Suspensions are prepared by wet milling (see, for example, Littler, U.S. Patent 3,060,084). Granules and pellets may be made by spraying the active material upon preformed granular carriers or by agglomeration techniques. See J.E. Browning, "Agglomeration", Chemical Engineering , December 4, 1967, pp. 147ff. and "Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook", 5th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973, pp. 8-57ff. For further information regarding the art of formulation, see for example: H. M. Loux, U.S. Patent 3,235,361, February 15, 1966, Col. 6, line 16 through Col. 7, line 19 and Examples 10 through 41; R. W. Luckenbaugh, U.S. Patent 3,309,192, March 14, 1967, Col. 5, line 43 through Col. 7, line 62 and Examples 8, 12, 15, 39, 41, 52, 53, 58, 132, 138-140, 162-164, 166, 167 and 169-182; H. Gysin and E. Knusli, U.S. Patent 2,891,855, June 23, 1959, Col. 3, line 66 through Col. 5, line 17 and Examples 1-4; G. C. Klingman, "Weed Control as a Science", John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1961, pp. 81-96; and J. D. Fryer and S. A. Evans, "Weed Control Handbook", 5th Ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1968, pp. 101-103. In the following Examples, all parts are by weight unless otherwise indicated. Example 7 Wettable Powder Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 80% sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate 2% sodium ligninsulfonate 2% synthetic amorphous silica 3% kaolinite 13% The ingredients are blended, hammer-milled until all the solids are essentially under 50 microns, reblended, and packaged. Example 8 Wettable Powder Ethyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 50% sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate 2% low viscosity methyl cellulose 2% diatomaceous earth 46% The ingredients are blended, coarsely hammer-milled and then air-milled to produce particles essentially all below 10 microns in diameter. The product is reblended before packaging. Example 9 Granule Wettable Powder of Example 8 5% attapulgite granules (U.S.S. 20 to 40 mesh; 0.84-0.42 mm) 95% A slurry of wettable powder containing solids is sprayed on the surface of attapulgite granules in a double-cone blender. The granules are dried and packaged. 25% Example 10 Extruded Pellet Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 25% anhydrous sodium sulfate 10% crude calcium ligninsulfonate 5% sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate 1% calcium/magnesium bentonite 59% The ingredients are blended, hammer-milled and then moistened with about 12% water. The mixture is extruded as cylinders about 3 mm diameter which are cut to produce pellets about 3 mm long. These may be used directly after drying, or the dried pellets may be crushed to pass a U.S.S. No. 20 sieve (0.84 mm openings). The granules held on a U.S.S. No. 40 sieve (0.42 mm openings) may be packaged for use and the fines recycled. Example 11 Low Strength Granule Ethyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 0.1% attapulgite granules (U.S.S. 20 to 40 mesh, 0.42 to 0.84 mm) 99.9% The active ingredient is dissolved in a solvent and the solution is sprayed upon dedusted granules in a double-cone blender. After spraying of the solution has been completed, the material is warmed to evaporate the solvent. The material is allowed to cool and then packaged. Example 12 Granule Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 80% wetting agent 1% crude ligninsulfonate salt (containing 5 to 20% of the natural sugars) 10% attapulgite clay 9% The ingredients are blended and milled to pass through a 100 mesh screen. This material is then added to a fluid bed granulator, the air flow is adjusted to gently fluidize the material, and a fine spray of water is sprayed onto the fluidized material. The fluidization and spraying are continued until granules of the desired size range are made. The spraying is stopped, but fluidization is continued, optionally with heat, until the water content is reduced to the desired level, generally less than 1%. The material is then discharged, screened to the desired size range, generally 14 to 100 mesh (1410 to 149 microns), and packaged for use. Example 13 Low Strength Granule Ethyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 1% N,N-dimethylformamide 9% attapulgite granules (U.S.S. 20 to 40 sieve, 0.42 to 0.84 mm) 90% The active ingredient is dissolved in the solvent and the solution is sprayed upon dedusted granules in a double cone blender. After spraying of the solution has been completed, the blender is allowed to run for a short period and then the granules are packaged. Example 14 Aqueous Suspension Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 40% polyacrylic acid thickener 0.3% dodecylphenol polyethylene glycol ether 0.5% disodium phosphate 1% monosodium phosphate 0.5% polyvinyl alcohol 1.0% water 56.7% The ingredients are blended and ground together in a sand mill to produce particles essentially all under 5 microns in size. Example 15 Solution Ethyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino] sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate, sodium salt 5% water 95% The salt is added directly to the water with stirring to produce the solution, which may then be packaged for use. Example 16 High Strength Concentrate Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino] sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 99% silica aerogel 0.5% synthetic amorphous silica 0.5% The ingredients are blended and ground in a hammer-mill to produce a material essentially all passing a U.S.S. No. 50 screen (0.3 mm opening). The concentrate may be formulated further if necessary. Example 17 Wettable Powder Ethyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino] sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 90% dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate 0.1% synthetic fine silica 9.9% The ingredients are blended and ground in a hammer-mill to produce particles essentially all below 100 microns. The material is sifted through a U.S.S. No. 50 screen and then packaged. Example 18 Wettable Powder Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 40% sodium ligninsulfonate 20% montmorillonite clay 40% The ingredients are thoroughly blended, coarsely hammer-milled and then air-milled to produce particles essentially all below 10 microns in size. The material is reblended and then packaged. Example 19 Oil Suspension Ethyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 35% blend of polyalcohol carboxylic esters and oil soluble petroleum sulfonates 6% xylene 59% The ingredients are combined and ground together in a sand mill to produce particles essentially all below 5 microns. The product can be used directly, extended with oils, or emulsified in water. Example 20 Dust Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 10% attapulgite 10% Pyrophyllite 80% The active ingredient is blended with attapulgite and then passed through a hammer-mill to produce particles substantially all below 200 microns. The ground concentrate is then blended with powdered pyrophyllite until homogeneous. Example 21 Oil Suspension Ethyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 25% polyoxyethylene sorbitol hexaoleate 5% highly aliphatic hydrocarbon oil 70% The ingredients are ground together in a sand mill until the solid particles have been reduces to under about 5 microns. The resulting thick suspension may be applied directly, but preferably after being extended with oils or emulsified in water. Example 22 Wettable Powder Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate 20% sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate 4% sodium ligninsulfonate 4% low viscosity methyl cellulose 3% attapulgite 69% The ingredients are thoroughly blended. After grinding in a hammer-mill to produce particles essentially all below 100 microns, the material is reblended and sifted through a U.S.S. No. 50 sieve (0.3 mm opening) and packaged. Utility The compounds of this invention are particularly useful for the control of undesired vegetation in sugar beets, fodder beets, and red beets. These are crops that take long time periods to become established. In this interval, the crop seedlings must be nurtured carefully, with particular attention to weed control to prevent damage and yield loss due to competition. The subject compounds can be used either pre- or post-emergence and will control numerous problem weeds including catchweed bedstraw ( Galium aparine ), wild buckwheat ( Polygonum convolvulus ), wild mustard ( Sinapsis arvensis ) and blackgrass ( Alopercurus mysoroides ). The rate of application for these compounds is determined by a number of factors including the weeds to be controlled, weather and climate, soil type, time of application, age and size of crop and weeds, method of application, etc. In general terms, the rate will vary between about 0.5 and 1000 g/ha, with preferred rates of about 10 to 125 g/ha. The rate to be used in any given situation can be selected by one with ordinary skill in the art. These compounds can and will often be used in mixtures with one or more other herbicides. They may be mixed with other herbicides selective on beet crops, including metamitron, phenmedipham, desmedipham, chloridazon, lenacil, ethofumesate, cycloate, clopyralid, diallate, triallate, diclofop-methyl, quizalofop-ethyl, fuzalifop-butyl, haloxafop, sethoxidym and alloxidym. The selective properties of these compounds were discovered in greenhouse tests. The results of these tests clearly show the activity and selectivity of these compounds and are shown in the tables below. TEST A Seeds of barley ( Hordeum vulgare ), barnyardgrass ( Echinochloa crus-galli ), cheatgrass ( Bromus secalinus ) or downy brome ( Bromus tectorum ), cocklebur ( Xanthium pensylvanicum ), corn ( Zea mays ), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum ), crabgrass ( Digitaria ssp.), giant foxtail ( Setaria faberi ), morningglory ( Ipomoea spp.), rice ( Oryza sativa ), sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor ), soybean ( Glycine max ), sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris ), velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), and wild oat ( Avena fatua ) and purple nutsedge ( Cyperus rotundus ) tubers were planted and treated preemergence with test chemicals dissolved in a non-phytotoxic solvent. At the same time, these crop and weed species were also treated with postemergence applications of test chemicals. Plants ranged in height from two to eighteen cm (two or three leaf stage) for postemergence treatments. Treated plants and controls were maintained in a greenhouse for sixteen days, after which all species were compared to control and visually evaluated. The ratings, summarized in Table A, are based on a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 is no effect and 10 is complete control. A dash (-) response means no test. The accompanying descriptive symbols have the following meanings: C = chlorosis/necrosis; G = growth retardation; and H = formative effect. TEST B Seeds of barley ( Hordeum vulgare ), barnyardgrass ( Echinochloa crus-galli ), blackgrass ( Alopecurus myosuroides ), chickweed ( Stellaria media ), cocklebur ( Xanthium pensylvanicum ), corn ( Zea mays ), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum ), crabgrass ( Digitaria spp.), downy brome ( Bromus tectorum ), giant foxtail ( Setaria faberi ), green foxtail ( Setaria viridis ), jimsonweed ( Datura stramonium ), johnsongrass ( Sorghum halepense ), lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album ), morningglory ( Ipomoea spp.), rape ( Brassica napus ), rice ( Oryza sativa ), sicklepod ( Cassia obtusifolia ), soybean ( Glycine max ), sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris ), teaweed ( Sida spinosa ), velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), wild buckwheat ( Polygonum convolvulus ), and wild oat ( Avena fatua ) and purple nutsedge ( Cyperus rotundus ) tubers were planted and treated preemergence with test chemicals dissolved in a non-phytotoxic solvent. At the same time, these crop and weed species were also treated with postemergence applications of test chemicals. Plants ranged in height from two to eighteen cm (two to three leaf stage) for postemergence treatments. Treated plants and controls were maintained in a greenhouse for approximately 24 days, after which all species were compared to controls and visually evaluated. The ratings, summarized in Table B, are based on a scale of 0 to 100 where 0 is no effect and 100 is complete control. A dash (-) response means no test. TEST C Seeds selected from crop and weed species consisting of annual bluegrass ( Poa annua ), barley ( Hordeum vulgare ), black nightshade ( Solanum nigrum ), blackgrass ( Alopecurus myosuroides ), catchweed bedstraw ( Galium aparine ), chickweed ( Stellaria media ), green foxtail ( Setaria viridis ), Italian ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum ), knotweed ( Polygonum aviculare ), kochia ( Kochia scoparia ), lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album ), pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus ), rape ( Brassica napus ), scentless chamomile ( Matricaria inodora ), smartweed ( Polygonum persicaria ), speedwell ( Veronica persica ), sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris ), viola ( Viola arvensis ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), wild buckwheat ( Polygonum convolvulus ), wild mustard ( Brassica spp.), wild oat ( Avena fatua ) and wild radish ( Raphanus raphanistrum ) were planted and treated preemergence with test chemicals dissolved in a non-phytotoxic solvent. Selected species from this list of crops and weeds were also treated with postemergence applications of test chemicals. Plants ranged in height from two to twenty cm (two to three leaf stage) for postemergence treatments. Treated plants and controls were maintained in a greenhouse for approximately 24 days, after which all species were compared to controls and visually evaluated. The ratings, summarized in Table C, are based on a scale of 0 to 100 where 0 is no effect and 100 is complete control. A dash (-) response means no test.

Claims: Claims for the following Contracting States : AT, BE, CH, DE, FR, GB, GR, IT, LI, LU, NL, SE A compound of the formula wherein R is C₁-C₄ alkyl, CH₂CH=CH₂, CH₂C≡CH, cyclopropylmethyl or CH₂CH₂R₂; R₁ is C₁-C₂ alkyl, C₁-C₂ haloalkyl, CH₂CN, CH₂OCH₃, C₁-C₃ alkoxy, C₁-C₃ alkylthio, phenylthio or NR₃R₄; R₂ is C₁-C₂ alkoxy, C₁-C₂ alkylthio, CN or halogen; R₃ and R₄ are independently H or CH₃; and X is NHCH₃, N(CH₃)₂ or N(CH₃)OCH₃; provided that when R₁ is OCH₂CH₃ or CH₂OCH₃, then R is other than CH₃; and their agriculturally suitable salts. The compounds of Claim 1 wherein R is C₁-C₄ alkyl; R₁ is C₁-C₂ alkyl; and X is NHCH₃ or N(CH₃)₂. The compounds of Claim 1 wherein R is C₁-C₄ alkyl; R₁ is C₁-C₂ haloalkyl; and X is NHCH₃ or N(CH₃)₂. The compounds of Claim 2 wherein R is C₁-C₃ alkyl; and X is NHCH₃. The compounds of Claim 2 wherein R is C₁-C₃ alkyl; and X is N(CH₃)₂. A compound of Claim 1 which is ethyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]-sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate; or an agriculturally suitable salt thereof. A compound of Claim 1 which is methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]-sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate ; or an agriculturally suitable salt thereof. A composition suitable for controlling the growth of undesired vegetation which comprises an effective amount of a compound of any of claims 1 to 5 and at least one of the following: surfactant, solid diluent or liquid diluent. A composition suitable for controlling the growth of undesired vegetation which comprises an effective amount of a compound of Claim 6 or 7 and at least one of the following: surfactant, solid diluent or liquid diluent. A method for the control of undesired vegetation which comprises applying to the locus to be protected an effective amount of a compound of any of Claims 1 to 5. A method for the control of undesired vegetation which comprises applying to the locus to be protected an effective amount of a compound of Claim 6. A method for the control of undesired Vegetation which comprises applying to the locus to be protected an effective amount of a compound of Claim 7. The method of Claim 10 wherein the locus to be protected is a sugar beet crop. The method of Claim 11 or 12 wherein the locus to be protected is a sugar beet crop. Claims for the following Contracting State : ES A process for the preparation of a compound of the formula wherein R is C₁-C₄ alkyl, CH₂CH=CH₂, CH₂C≡CH, cyclopropylmethyl or CH₂CH₂R₂; R₁ is C₁-C₂ alkyl, C₁-C₂ haloalkyl, CH₂CN, CH₂OCH₃, C₁-C₃ alkoxy, C₁-C₃ alkylthio, phenylthio or NR₃R₄; R₂ is C₁-C₂ alkoxy, C₁-C₂ alkylthio, CN or halogen; R₃ and R₄ are independently H or CH₃; and X is NHCH₃, N(CH₃)₂ or N(CH₃)OCH₃; provided that when R₁ is OCH₂CH₃ or CH₂OCH₃, then R is other than CH₃; or an agriculturally suitable salt thereof; which comprises: (a) reacting a silyl sulfonamide of Formula II with a heterocyclic carbamate of Formula III at 0° to 50°C in a solvent in the presence of a fluoride ion source for 0.1 to 2 hours; or (b) reacting said heterocyclic carbamate of Formula III with a sulfonamide of Formula IV at 0° to 50°C in a solvent in the presence of a non-nucleophilic base for 0.2 to 2 hours. The process of Claim 1 wherein R is C₁-C₄ alkyl; R₁ is C₁-C₂ alkyl; and X is NHCH₃ or N(CH₃)₂. The process of Claim 1 wherein R is C₁-C₄ alkyl; R₁ is C₁-C₂ haloalkyl; and X is NHCH₃ or N(CH₃)₂. The process of Claim 2 wherein R is C₁-C₃ alkyl; and X is NHCH₃. The process of Claim 2 wherein R₁ is C₁-C₃ alkyl; and X is N(CH₃)₂. A process of Claim 1 wherein the product is ethyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5- triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]-sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate, or an agriculturally suitable salt thereof. A process of Claim 1 wherein the product is methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]-sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate, or an agriculturally suitable salt thereof. A composition suitable for controlling the growth of undesired vegetation which comprises an effective amount of a compound of Formula I as defined in any of Claims 1 to 7 and at least one of the following: surfactant, solid diluent or liquid diluent. A method for the control of undesired vegetation which comprises applying to the locus to be protected an effective amount of a compound of Formula I as defined in any of Claims 1 to 5. A method for the control of undesired vegetation which comprises applying to the locus to be protected an effective amount of a compound as defined in Claim 6 or Claim 7. The method of Claim 9 wherein the locus to be protected is a sugar beet crop. The method of Claim 10 wherein the locus to be protected is a sugar beet crop.

Inventors: MOON, MARCUS, P.
Applicants: E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Application year: 1989
Main classification: C07D251
IPC codes: C07D521, C07D251, A01N47