PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR THE DETECTION OF SULFUR

Abstract: A process and apparatus for the detection and measurement of sulfur in both organic and inorganic sulfur-containing compounds. The process includes admixing a sample from source (10) including a sulfur-containing compound with oxygen from source (14), and then exposing the mixture to a source of combustion causing heat in the presence of a combustion supporting reducing agent (18) at combustion site (12). The resulting combustion products are extracted from the combustion site (12), directed into a low pressure chamber (20) and then contacted with ozone (22) with the result that the sulfur combustion products are converted to chemiluminescent sulfur dioxide. The emitted chemiluminescence is then detected, and may be measured to provide a quantitative indication of the amount of sulfur in the original sample. The preferred source of oxygen is air, the preferred form of combustion heat is a flame, and the preferred form of reducing agent is hydrogen gas.

Description: PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR THE DETECTION OF SULFUR BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION: TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates generally to processes and apparatus for detection and measuring of chemically- bound sulfur, and more particularly, to the detection and measurement of sulfur combustion products which have been contacted by ozone to form chemiluminescent reaction products. The present invention also relates to improved processes and apparatus for enhancing the chemilumines¬ cent detection of sulfur by the reduction of interfering compositions. BACKGROUND ART Numerous processes and apparatus have been devised for detecting and measuring chemical substances. Among detectors used to detect and measure fluids, whether from an independent source, or from the output of a gas chromatographic apparatus, are those using thermal conductivity, hydrogen flame ionization, electronic capture, alkaline flame ionization, and flame photometry. Of particular interest in recent years has been the sensitive and selected detection of sulfur compounds, both as a pollutant in the environment, and from other sources. The most widely utilized sulfur selective detector at the present times is the flame photometric detector (FPD). The FPD device and process is based on the fact that a hydrogen flame in the presence of air (oxygen) emits electromagnetic radiation, usually in the form of visible spectra light. In practice, a carrier fluid transporting a to-be-tested substance, for example an eluent separated from a sample by a chromatographic instrument, is mixed with an air stream (which may be oxygen enriched), and passed onto a hydrogen burner, or a burner in the presence of hydrogen. The resulting mixture contains hydrogen in excess of that required for complete combustion of the oxygen present. The luminous radiation caused by this combustion impinges or is reflected through an optical filter which has been selected according to the desired radiation wavelength of the substance to be measured. Subsequently, the light from the filter passes to a light detector, such as a photomultiplier tube. The photomultiplier tube produces a current which can be detected, measured, analyzed, recorded, and so on, to indicate the substance and the amount of the substance. Such an FPD system can be used as a specific selective detector and process for sulfur in sulfur containing substances since a specific wave-length is emitted from the formation of molecular species of sulfur during the burning of the hydrogen flame. Such an FPD system is relatively sensitive and has been widely used, for example in pollution determination. However, the fundamental response of such FPD detectors to sulfur is not linear with respect to the concentration of the to be measured sulfur, and are difficult to calibrate with accuracy, especially for the measurement of low concen¬ trations of sulfur. Another distinct problem with FPD devices is that numerous other components in the sample can interfere with accurate determination of sulfur. Another approach to measuring sulfur-containing compounds in a fluid sample, includes the use of chemi- lu inescence detection schemes. There remains a need for a process and device capable of measuring sulfur compounds accurately, quickly and in the low femtogram range without being sensitive to interference of other compounds and components of the sample being tested. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In view of the foregoing, it is an object of the present invention to provide a process and device for detecting and measuring sulfur in a fluid sample, and in particular in an environmental air sample or a chromato¬ graphic eluent. It is another object of the present invention to provide a process and device for detecting sulfur- containing compounds in a rapid and continuous manner without regard to the presence of other compounds in the sample. A further object of the present invention is to provide a novel and improved method and apparatus for measurement of sulfur-containing compounds by chemilum- inescent reaction with ozone at low pressures in such a way as to be sensitive to sulfur compounds, but insensitive to water vapor, carbon dioxide or other hydrocarbon interferences. A still further object of the present, invention is to provide a method and apparatus for using flame photometry detction of various elements and measurement of sulfur- containing compounds by chemiluminescent reaction. Accordingly, the present invention discloses and teaches a process and apparatus for the detection and measurement of bound sulfur in organic and inorganic sulfur containing compounds. The process includes admixing a fluid sample having a sulfur-containing compound with an oxygen source. This mixture is then exposed to a combustion causing heat source, such as a flame, in the presence of a reducing agent. The resulting gaseous combustion products are then vacuum extracted from the combustion site, and then directed into a darkened low pressure chamber. The combustion products in the low pressure chamber are then contacted with ozone, with the result that the sulfur combustion products are converted to chemiluminescent sulfur dioxide in an excited state. Finally, the chemiluminescence is detected and measured to provide an indication of the amount of sulfur in the fluid sample. The preferred source of oxygen is air, the preferred form of combustion heat is a flame, and the preferred form of reducing agent is hydrogen gas, although methane, butane, and propane may be similarly used. In one particular preferred embodiment of the invention, a halogenated compound is injected into the sample mixture prior to or at the time that it is subjected to combustion. In another particular preferred embodiment of the invention, the method and apparatus allow for the use of both flame photometry detction of various elements and measurement of sulfur-containing compounds by chemilum¬ inescent reaction using the same equipment. As described in greater detail below, the present invention utilizes a hydrogen-air flame to produce a combustion product of either sulfur monoxide (SO) or hydrogen sulfide (H2S) for subsequent reaction with ozone. It should be noted that, because of its thermal instability, ozone cannot be directly introduced at the combustion site as a feasible means of exploiting the chemiluminescent reaction of ozone with the combustion products. Various studies have shown that a significant portion of sulfur entering a flame produces sulfur monoxide. In fact, the sulfur monoxide so produced is present in the flame combustion products in concen¬ trations which are about ten times greater than atomic sulfur, which is the substance which is normally measured by conventional FPD processes and apparatus. However, it is a possibility that the process of the present invention actually produces H 2 S, and then detects the chemiluminescent reaction of H2S with ozone. Neverthe- less, it is believed that the principle combustion product is sulfur monoxide. Regardless of whether SO or H S is produced as the combustion product, they both produce approximately the same wavelength of light during the chemiluminescent reaction with ozone, thereby allowing the quantitative detection of sulfur. The present invention utilizes a narrow capillary sampling probe, discussed below, which is designed to quickly draw substantially all of the combustion products to low pressure chamber which is maintained at a rela¬ tively low temperature for reaction with ozone. An important and preferred aspect of the present invention is that by lowering the pressure of the combustion product gases to a pressure within the range of about of 1 torr to about 50 torr, with approximately 10 torr preferred, the chemical combustion reactions are quenched, the possibility of condensation of water produced during combustion is eliminated, and the gas mixture of combustion products can be rapidly transferred to a light tight chamber for contact and chemical react-ion with ozone. These and other objects of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, showing the contemplated novel construction, combination, and elem-ents as herein described, and more particularly defined by the appended claims, it being understood that changes in the precise embodiments of the herein disclosed invention are meant to be included as coming within the scope of the claims, except insofar as they may be precluded by the prior art. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The accompanying drawings illustrate complete preferred embodiments of the present invention according to the best modes presently devised for the practical application of the principles thereof, and in which: FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the apparatus of the present invention embodying the process of the present invention; FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an adjustable combustion assembly utilized in the present invention; and FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating sulfur dioxide concentration in parts per billion based on photo- multiplier tube measurements of chemiluminescent light produced from samples measured using the process and apparatus of the present invention. BEST MODES Referring now to FIG. 1, a schematic diagram of the present version of the apparatus is illustrated therein. Referring first to a general overview of the process of the invention, a fluid sample (either gas or liquid) which contains a sulfur compound, from a source 10 is directed to a combustion site, in this case burner assembly 12. The to-be-tested sample is admixed with oxygen from a source 14 prior to reaching the combustion assembly 12. In preferred practice, oxygen is derived from an ambient air supply and is scrubbed through an activated charcoal trap 16 to remove ambient sulfur prior to admixture with the sulfur sample from 10. The sulf r-oxygen admixture sample is then exposed to combustion causing heat in flame assembly 12 in the presence of a reducing agent from a source 18. The reducing agent is preferably hydrogen. The gaseous combustion products of the flame from the assembly 12 are immediately vacuum extracted through a flow restricted orifice to a darkened, low pressure, ambient temperature reaction chamber 20. Ozone is continuously directed into reaction chamber 20 from an ozone generator or other ozone source 22. In reaction chamber 20 ozone is admixed and reacted with the gaseous combustion products from combustion assembly 12. This particular procedure results in the production of chemiluminescent radiation from excited SO2, which radiation is measured by a light detector, such as a photomultiplier tube, and recorder assembly combination 24. The low pressure in the chamber 20 and at the ori-fice of the assembly 12 is maintained by a vacuum pump 26 which also assists in removing the products from the reaction chamber 20 after chemiluminescence. The present system includes an ozone trap 28 to prevent ozone from inadvertently entering the atmosphere or the vacuum pump. Any desired or standard ozone generator 22 may be utilized in the present invention. Additional details of reaction chamber 20 are described in Sievers, et al. U.S. Patent 4,717,675. However, one of the differences between reaction chamber 20 of the present invention and the Redox Chemilumine- scence Detector (RCD) reaction chamber disclosed in the referenced Sievers, et al. U.S. Patent is that the measurement of sulfur dioxide chemiluminescence produced by the present invention requires a blue sensitive photomultiplier tube. In the form shown in FIG. 1, the sulfur-containing sample from source 10 was a calibrated sulfur gas of known concentration. While hydrogen is the preferred reducing agent, other reducing agents such as methane, butane, propane, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, ketones, olefins, and aromatic compounds may be used in the practice of the present invention. In one embodiment of the present invention, a Redox Chemiluminescence Detector model 270, from Sievers Research, Boulder, Colorado was obtained and then modified according to the present invention. Modific-ations to this commercially available unit included the replacement of the standard photomultiplier tube with a blue sensitive photomultiplier tube, as indicated previously, replacement of the glass window with a fused quartz window, and the addition of an optical filter (7-54 Corning Glass Works, Corning, New York). The optical filter transmits between about 240 nanometers and about 410 nanometers with a peak transmittance of about 82% at 320 nm. The blue sensitive photomultiplier tube was a model R 268 Hamamatsu. In addition, the reaction cell was modified from that of the Sievers Redox Chemiluminescence Detector (RCD) model 270, to accommodate greater sample flow rates. Larger flow rates were achieved by replacement of the standard 25 liter/minute vacuum pump with a 300 liter/minute model (Model 1012, Alcatel, France). A high capacity ozone generator is utilized in the present invention which could produce 100 cm3/minute, nearly ten times more ozone, than tne ozone generator in the standard Sievers RCD reaction chamber. Dilution air used in the dynamic dilution calibration system was metered by a rotometer and calibration standards of sulfur gases as well as hydrogen were metered with mass flow meters. Dilution air for the ambient air supply 14 was obtained from a laboratory bench supply, but was first passed through the activated charcoal absorbent bed 16 as previously indicated. All tubing between the sample orifice and the reaction chamber reaction cell was coated with halocarbon wax (Series 1200, Halocarbon Products, Hackensack, New Jersey) to minimize reaction and loss of the SO at the tube walls. Oxygen supplied to the ozone generator and hydrogen were standard grade and no provisions were made to remove contaminants from those gases. The sample orifice was empirically sized to provide 3 a total flow of 500 actual cm /min in a reaction cell pressure of 9 - 10 torr, as discussed below. FIG. 2 illustrates in more detail one preferred arrangement for burner assembly 12. More specifically, assembly 12 is of quartz and is built to contain a combustion heat source in the form of a diffusion flame. The assembly 12 includes a quartz housing 30 with a sample/air intake vent 32. Hydrogen or other reducing agent is injected through an injection vent 34 which projects into the housing 30. The terminal end 36 of the vent tube 34 is the site of the diffusion flame. A quartz probe 38 terminating in an orifice 40 projects within the housing 30. The flame resides between the terminal end of the probe 38 and the end 36 of the tube 34. The end 36 acts as the flame site at which the flame resides. Probe 38 is mounted to a sliding seal 42. Sliding seal 42 permits the distance between the end of probe 38 and the end 36 of tube 34 to be varied. In this manner, the residence time of the sample in the burner may be varied from about 1 millisecond to about 40 millisecond. In preferred form, the residence time of the sample in the burner is about 4 ms/cm. In an alternate form, the flame from an flame ionization detector (FID) may also be used as a flame source for the present invention. Moreover, any type of flame source may be utilized to react the sample with oxygen and reducing agents to generate the combustion gases for subsequent reaction with ozone and chemilum-inescence from excited sulfur dioxide. The detector of the present invention tests for sulfur in a real-time analysis mode. It is believed to be important that the post-flame pneumatic system be maintained at as low a pressure as possible for a variety of reasons. First, the intensity of the chemiluminescent reaction is found to be inversely proportional to pressure with a half-quenching pressure of about 0.02 torr. In addition, the gaseous sample stream produced from the flame is about 25% water vapor requiring that the pneumatic system be maintained well below the vapor pressure of water, which is about 50 torr, in order to prevent condensation of water in the reaction chamber. This is important since the condensation of water would dramatically interfere with the chemiluminescent aspects of the present invention. Also, the post-flame reactions are effectively quenched at low pressure, thereby allow¬ ing unreacted SO radical to be transported to the reaction chamber. All data presented below are based on a sample air 3 flow of 500 cm /min, a cell pressure of 50 torr, and 6% 0 3 in 100 cm of 0 2 . The addition of a UV filter in the reaction chamber decreased the high baseline signal to less than 0.5% of full scale. Typical parameters for the examples shown below include 300 ml/min of hydrogen reducing agent, 500 ml/min of air and sample into the flame, an oxygen flow of approximately 100 ml/min., and a system pressure of approximately 10 torr. "Equivalence ratio" is defined as the ratio of the actual hydrogen flow rate to the hydrogen flow rate which would be required for stoichiometric combustion. The sensitivity of the process and apparatus of the present invention to sulfur dioxide and all other sulfur contain- ing gases tested is a function of the equivalence ratio. It was found that the optimal equivalence ratio of the process and apparatus of the present invention is in the range of about 1.4 and about 1.6. This optimum equi- valence ratio has been found to be independent of the sample residence time in the flame, and thus is also independent of the sample orifice position. It is theorized that the reason for this well defined, relatively sharp, equivalence ratio is the requirement that there be sufficient hydrogen to react with the molecular oxygen which is present in the sample. As a result, the rate at which SO is converted to SO2 is reduced without reducing the temperature of the flame to a temperature at which SO can not be formed. With respect to the flame residence time, it was determined that the optimum flame residence time is approximately 2.5 ms. Sensitivity, as a function of the flame residence time, decreases very rapidly at flame residence times of less then about 2.5 ms. It is postulated that the decrease in sensitivity at shorter times is probably due to incomplete combustion during which SO (or H 2 S) is not formed. At residence times longer then about 2.5 ms the signal reaches a constant value at the SO equilibrium concentration, but the background noise increases due to a less stable flame. With respect to the effect of ozone flow and concentration, a standard reaction chamber ozone generator was initially used. The ozone concentration produced by the reaction chamber ozone generator using dry air was found to be about one-half of the ozone concentration produced with oxygen. An improvement in sensitivity was observed in the system when oxygen was used to produce ozone. Therefore, in the preferred embodiment of th present invention, a larger ozone generator, one capable of increasing ozone concentration by ten times, was used wit an ambient dried air supply. This resulted in at least doubling of sensitivity. In any event, the ozone flow rate at which the sensitivity was found to be optimum was about 3 6 ml/min in about 100 mm /min of oxygen. Due to the presence of atmospheric nitrogen, the flame produced a large amount of NO which also reacts with ozone, which is the reason that a large amount of ozone is required. However, because it occurs at a longer wavelength not passed by the optical filter, the reaction of NO with ozone was not found to interfere with the chemiluminescence detection and measurement of SO2 (or H2S). In the prior art, two common interfering species for flame photometric detector processes and apparatus operated in real time mode were carbon dioxide and water vapor. The process and device of the present invention demonstrated no interfering effect on either the baseline signal or the response to a given concentration of SO2 due to ambient water vapor, i.e. water vapor present in an amount between about 0.4% and about 3.0%, which is equi-valent to about 12% to about 83% relative humidity at 23 C. It also demonstrated no interfering effect due to carbon dioxide in concentrations between about 350 ppmv and 1700 about ppmv. When used with samples obtained from chromatographic analyses, two compounds which commonly coelute are methylethyl sulfide (MES) and hexane. In the prior art, the presence of hexane was found to enhance the sulfur signal at low sulfur concentrations, and to quench the sulfur signal at high sulfur concentrations. Tests utilizing the present invention for various flame residence times demonstrated that it is possible to eliminate any interference from hexane entirely by adjusting the flame residence time. In the prior art, the presence of heptene was found to cause a large signal in other sulfur monitors. The response to SO2 (or H2S) as a function of heptene concentration at a fixed flame residence time of 7.5 ms was also studied for the present invention, and was found to be responsible for an enhancement of the SO2 (or H2S) signal. The apparatus of the present invention did not have any detectable response to clean air, that is air with substantially no sulfur, in the presence of concentrations of either hexane or heptene up to 4000 ppmv. It is further noted that the equipment of the present invention apparently responds to hydrocarbons about 10 4 to about 105 times less than that reported for state of the art FPD devices. The following examples provide additional details: EXAMPLE I The process of the present invention, utilizing the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 and detailed above was used intermittently for approximately 30 days, during which time the standard parameters set forth above were developed. During that operation a stable baseline signal and good sensitivity to sulfur was obtained. A number of organic and inorganic sulfur compounds which were tested, that is EtSH, MeSO, CS , S0 2 , and SFg. The results of these operations and tests are illustrated in FIG. 3. It will be noted that the tests are consistent and show good sensitivity to sulfur dioxide concentra-tion. EXAMPLE II It was observed that after nearly two months of working with the process and apparatus of the present invention, as described in EXAMPLE I, the baseline signal began to increase continuously. In spite of the increase in baseline, it was determined that the process and apparatus of the present invention continued to have a sensitive response to each of the organic and inorganic sulfur compounds which were tested. However, with the increase in the baseline, quantification of the response became unreliable. In a series of experiments it was determined that after extended use of the apparatus the background chemiluminescence increased, even when the ozone generator was turned off, and disappeared completely when the oxygen flow was stopped. It was therefore apparent that after extended use of the system oxygen alone was reacting with the sulfur containing sample gases. How-ever, the absolute intensity of the background signal of the oxygen chemiluminescence was not sufficiently intense to allow spectral analysis. Therefore, the chemical species which produces the chemiluminescence with oxygen in the flame is unknown. It was further noted that chemiluminescence continued even after the flow of sulfur compounds to RCD 20 was stopped. The following observations were made when the baseline was too high and irregular to allow analytical use of the process and apparatus of the present invention: 1) The baseline signal increased even when the ozone generator was turned off. 2) The baseline signal decreased to zero if the oxygen flow was stopped completely. 3) The sensitivity to sulfur dioxide decreased if the baseline was high compared to the sensitivity when the baseline was at its normal, lower level. 4) The magnitude of the baseline signal was affected by changing the hydrogen flow rate. The highest baseline signal was observed with the same hydrogen flow rate that produced the most sensitive response to sulfur. 5) The baseline signal could be decreased for a period of time to a very low and acceptable value by the momentary injection of any halogenated compound into the flame, without affecting the sensitivity to sulfur. 6) Replacement of the quartz sample orifice with a newly fabricated one did not affect the baseline signal. Since it was found that the addition of a small amount of a halogenated compound to the flame would eliminate the baseline drift without affecting the sensitivity to sulfur, it is theorized that the unknown reactive species which is responsible for the background chem-luminescence is scavenged by halogen ions. Consequently, in order to maintain a low baseline over a long period of use of the process and apparatus of the present invention, one embodiment of the present invention introduces a halogenated compound, such as Fluorocarbon 12, Fluorocarbon 11, or carbon tetrachloridε to the sample at point 46 illustrated in FIG. 1. Thus the halogenated compound is introducing into the oxygen and sulfur sample admixture at, or immediately before the flame. The halogenated compound could also be introduced into the hydrogen flow just before the flame. With the addition of a halogenated compound, the baseline has been observed to remain low and stable, with an observed change of from a maximum to a minimum the equivalent of less than 0.2 ppbv sulfur during 75 hours of continuous observation. EXAMPLE III In an attempt to remedy the problem outlined in EXAMPLE II above, several different materials were used as the flow system walls in the belief that one would react with and thus remove the species causing the high baseline signal. The materials tested were halocarbon wax, halocarbon oil, paraffin wax, aluminum (type 6061-t6), stainless steel (type 304), and polytetrafluoro-ethylene. All six materials tested provided a short period of acceptable baseline signal. However, when it became apparent that the switching of flow system materials would provide only temporary reductions in baseline, a new approach was pursued. EXAMPLE IV The new approach involved the addition of a halogenated compound to the gas flow of the system on a continuous basis. As a result, a continuous flow of 0.45 3 cm /min of CF2CI2 chlorofluorocarbon was introduced into the sample air producing a concentration of several hundred ppm. The baseline was subsequently observed to be both low and stable for indefinite periods with the chlorofluorocarbon addition. Two other chlorofluoro- carbon concentrations have been used, 40 and 180 ppmv, and both work equally well for the maintenance of a low and stable baseline. In addition, none of the chloro¬ fluorocarbon concentrations tested affected, either positively or negatively, the sensitivity of the process and apparatus of the present invention to sulfur compounds. With the addition of 40 ppm chlorofluoro-carbon, it was possible to quantify the response to different sulfur compounds. These results indicated that the sensitivity to the sulfur compounds listed above in EXAMPLE I, as well as to H 2 S are all equal. It should once again be emphasized that the chlorofluorocarbon could be added to the flame, either into the air stream or into the hydrogen flow with the same reproducible results. The present invention has a variety of system applications. Reconfiguration of the system in only minor details provides different uses for the device and process of the invention. For one example, the addition of a chromatographic effluent into point A, that is 46 of FIG. 1, provides species specific detection of sulfur. In another example, removal of the activated charcoal trap 16 provides a means of monitoring concentrations of total sulfur in ambient air. The process and apparatus of the present invention for the detection and monitoring of sulfur has been shown to be a very sensitive, selective and linear detector operated in the real-time mode. The present invention provides detection limits at similar levels reported for flame photometric detectors, but at response times which are at least 30 times faster. The present invention does not suffer from the interference problems experienced by the flame photometric detectors of the prior art from water vapor or carbon dioxide and four to five orders of magnitude less for hydrocarbons. The present invention also provides uniform response to different sulfur com¬ pounds which greatly enhances its utility as a gas chrom¬ atographic detector. Finally, the present invention pro- atographic detector. Finally, the present invention pro¬ vides more accurate and faster sulfur detection capabil¬ ity than flame photometric detectors known previously hereto or prior detection devices which are based on chemiluminescence of reaction of ozone with the air sample directly. It will be understood that the invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or central characteristics thereof. The present examples and embodiments, therefore, are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not specifically restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims as limited by the prior art.

Claims: The embodiments for which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows: 1. A process for the detection and measurement of chemically bound sulfur in both organic and inorganic sulfur-containing compounds comprising the steps of: admixing a sample including a sulfur-containing compound with oxygen; exposing said mixture of sulfur-containing compound and oxygen to a source of combustion causing heat in the presence of a combustion supporting reducing agent at a combustion site; extracting the resulting gaseous combustion products, including sulfur combustion products, from said combustion site into a chamber; and then contacting said combustion products in said chamber, including said sulfur combustion products, with ozone under such conditions that said sulfur combustion products are converted to chemiluminescent sulfur dioxide. 2. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said chamber is maintained at a pressure below ambient pressure. 3. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said chamber is maintained at substantially ambient temper- ature. 4. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said chamber is maintained at a pressure below ambient pressure and at substantially ambient temperature. 5. The process as claimed in claim 4, wherein said sulfur combustion products are converted to a chemilumin¬ escent sulfur compound, wherein further said chamber is shielded from ambient light, and wherein further the resulting chemiluminescence is detected and measured to provide an indication of the amount of sulfur which was present in said sample including a sulfur-containing compound. 6. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said sulfur combustion products are converted to a chemilumin- escent sulfur compound, wherein further said chamber is shielded from ambient light, and wherein further the resulting chemiluminescence is detected and measured to provide an indication of the amount of sulfur which was present in said sample including a sulfur-containing compound. 7. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said oxygen with which said sample including a sulfur- containing compound is admixed is that which is include in ambient air. 8. The process as claimed in claim 7, wherein said ambient air is treated to substantially remove any sulfur or sulfur containing compounds prior to its admixture with said sample. 9. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said source of combustion is a flame at a flame site. 10. The process as claimed in claim 9, wherein said reducing agent is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, methane, butane, propane, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, ketones, olefins, and aromatic compounds. 11. The process as claimed in claim 10, wherein said reducing agent is gaseous hydrogen. 12. The process as claimed in claim 11, wherein said hydrogen is utilized to fuel said flame at a flame site. 13. The process as claimed in claim 12, wherein said flame site is within an enclosure, and there are means for introducing said mixture of sulfur-containing compound and oxygen into said enclosure. 14. The process as claimed in claim 13, wherein there are means for evacuating combustion products from said enclosure, and wherein there is a separation between said flame site and said evacuating means in order to allow residence time for combustion at said flame site. 15. The process as claimed in claim 14, wherein said separation between said flame site and said evacuating means is of variable distance in order to vary the residence time of combustion. 16. The process as claimed in claim 14, wherein said flame residence time is in the range of about 1 ms to about 40 ms. 17. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said reducing agent is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, methane, butane, propane, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, ketones, olefins, and aromatic compounds. 18. The process as claimed in claim 17, wherein said reducing agent is gaseous hydrogen. 19. The process as claimed in claim 18, wherein said hydrogen is utilized to fuel said flame at a flame site. 20. The process as claimed in claim 2, wherein said chemiluminescence is in the range of between about 240 nanometers and about 410 nanometers detected and measured utilizing a light detector which is sensitive to light in the range of about 240 nanometers and about 410 nano- meters. 21. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein said light detector system includes a photomultiplier tube. 22. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said process further includes the step of injecting a halogenated compound into said sample at or prior to combustion; to thereby maintain a low baseline signal is maintained in said chamber. 23. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said halogenated compound includes fluorocarbon. 24. A process for the detection and measurement of chemically bound sulfur in both organic and inorganic sulfur-containing compounds comprising the steps of: admixing a sample including a sulfur-containing compound with oxygen; exposing said mixture of sulfur-containing compound and oxygen to a source of combustion causing heat in the presence of a combustion supporting reducing agent at a combustion site; injecting a halogenated compound into said sample mixture during or prior to combustion extracting the resulting gaseous combustion products, including sulfur combustion products, from said combustion site into a chamber; and then contacting said combustion products in said chamber, including said sulfur combustion products, with ozone under such conditions that said sulfur combustion products are converted to a chemiluminescent sulfur compound. 25. Apparatus for the detection and measurement of chemically bound sulfur in both organic and inorganic sulfur-containing compounds, comprising in combination: means for producing combustion causing heat; means for introducing a sulfur-containing compound to said combustion means; means defining a source of combustion supporting reducing agent connected to said combustion means; a reaction chamber; means for evacuating combustion products from said combustion means to said reaction chamber; and means for introducing ozone into said reaction chamber; wherein the combustion products of sulfur react with ozone to produce a detectable and measurable chemiluminescent light. 26. Apparatus in accordance with claim 25, including chemiluminescent analyzer means for selectively detecting the chemiluminescence produced by the reaction of the sulfur containing combustion products with ozone. 27. Apparatus in accordance with claim 26, wherein said apparatus includes ozone generating means for producing ozone which is introduced to said chamber. 28. Apparatus in accordance with claim 25, wherein means for generating ozone are connected to said means for introducing ozone into said chamber. 29. Apparatus of claim 25, wherein said reaction chamber is shielded from ambient light. 30. Apparatus of claim 25, wherein said combustion means is within an enclosure, and wherein further means for introducing a to-be-detected sulfur-containing compound is defined in said enclosure and means for evacuating combustion products from said enclosure. 31. The apparatus of claim 30, wherein said combustion means includes a flame site. 32. The apparatus of claim 31, wherein said flame site is separated from said means for evacuating combustion products from said enclosure. 33. The apparatus of claim 32, wherein the distance between said means for evacuating combustion products from said enclosure and said flame site is variable. 34. The apparatus of claim 33, wherein said flame site is movable within said enclosure, thereby allowing the distance between said means for evacuating combustion products from said enclosure and said flame site to be varied. 35. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein a window is connected to said chamber to allow light detection of chemiluminescent light produced within said chamber. 36. The apparatus of claim 35, wherein said window is constructed of fused quartz. 37. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein a light detector is positioned to detect chemiluminescent light produced within said chamber through said window. 38. The apparatus of claim 37, wherein said light detector system includes a photomultiplier tube.

Inventors: BENNER RICHARD L, STEDMAN DONALD H, BENNER, RICHARD, L., STEDMAN, DONALD, H.
Applicants: BENNER RICHARD L, STEDMAN DONALD H, BENNER, RICHARD, L., STEDMAN, DONALD, H.
Application year: 1989
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: G01N21, G01N31, G01N33