NEW ANTIVIRAL AGENTS

Abstract: A method to treat HIV and other retroviral infections by administering a novel conjugate or the precursors to the conjugate is described. In a preferred embodiment, the individual components, Lucifer Yellow and a derivative of Lucifer Yellow with aromatic compounds having carbonyl functional groups for reaction with the semicarbazide moiety of Lucifer Yellow are used as precursors in pharmaceutical compositions for HIV treatment.

Description: NEW ANTIVIRAL AGENTS Technical Field The invention relates to materials which are useful in treating or inhibiting viral infection. More specifically, it concerns self-assembling naphthyl disulfonates and also concerns se icarbazones of Lucifer Yellow and its analogs' which are effective in inhibiting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and other retroviral infections. Background Art There are a number of viral diseases recognized as retroviral in origin in both humans and other animals. The most publicized such disease among humans is that caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as either AIDS or ARC. Other such diseases, however, include hepatitis B and hepatitis delta. Among cats, retroviral diseases include those caused by the feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and the feline leukemia virus (FeLV . A number of other animal species also contract retroviral-caused infections, such as the Visna virus infections of ungulates. There have been a number of approaches to the treatment of such diseases, none of them entirely successful. Over a million Americans and several million people worldwide are infected with HIV, and treatment with the experimental drug AZT, produced by Burroughs-Wellcome, appears to be of some help although it is clear that AZT is unable to cure AIDS and is extremely toxic. Nevertheless, AZT has been a considerable commercial success. " There is no doubt that there is a continuing need for more effective antiviral agents which are effective against retroviral infections in general, and against HIV in particular. It is recognized that there are many advantages to assembling a biologically active substance at the site of its intended activity, especially when the active substance can be formed from innocuous and nontoxic pre¬ cursors. PCT Application 088/00047, published 14 January 1988 and incorporated herein by reference, describes various materials which can be administered separately to a microenvironment and there assembled to create an active conjugate. One microenvironment which is of considerable interest is any of the loci of infection by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and the possibility to administer nontoxic precursors of a drug which would self- assemble at the site of the HIV infection would clearly be advantageous in treating the disease and symptomology caused by this virus. While the published PCT application describes generically the concept of active conjugate self-assembly at a desired locus, and provides certain exemplification of this concept, no specific compounds useful in the treatment of HIV infection are disclosed. In addition, rather than relying on self- assembly at the site of infection, preassembled compounds can be used which are related to those used as components in the assembly. Certain additional art discusses compounds which are also related to those described and claimed herein. Various active compounds have been suggested for the treatment of HIV infection, the best known being AZT and dextran sulfate. The compound most closely related to the invention conjugates described herein is suramin sodium, which is a complex conjugate of trisodium sulfonate naphthyl derivatives and aromatic nuclei linked through amide linkages. The structure of this compound NI NaOjS NH I c=o C=0 SOjNt — _ — The effects of suramin on the treatment of AIDS and its mechanism of action have been studied by a number of workers ' (Balzarini, J., et al, Int J Cancer (1986) 7:451-457; Levine, A.M., et al, Annals Int Med (1986) 105:32-37; Broder, S., et al, Lancet (1985) 1:627-630; Cheson, B.D., et al, JAMA (1987) 258:1347-1351) . In general, this compound has been found helpful in treat¬ ment, although its toxicity precludes its use as a single agent in treatment. Side effects include ophthalmic dam- age, hypoadrenalism, nausea, thrombocytopenia and vomit¬ ing, and some deaths have been attributed to these side effects. It has been suggested that the antiviral mechanism of suramin is due to binding of the polyanionic molecule to reverse transcriptase (DeClercq, E., Cancer Lett (1979) :9-22) and a large number of suramin analogs have been prepared. A total of 90 suramin analogs, of which 57 showed the ability to inhibit HIV-I reverse transcriptase activity, and 24 of which were superior to suramin in this inhibition, were prepared by Jentsch, K. D., et al, J Gen Virol (1987) £:2183-2192. A representative group of suramin analogs is shown in Figure 1. All of these are bis(naphthalene polysulfonic) acids, show ID 50 values in the range of 5-42 ug/ml and, like suramin, eliminate the cytopathic effect of HIV-I against MT4 cells at 50 ug/ml. As stated above, suramin sodium is highly toxic; too toxic be used clinically to treat HIV infection. The analogs so far prepared have similar drawbacks. Further, neither suramin nor its analogs offer the opportunity for localized formation through in situ self-assembly, as they are conjugated through amide or urea linkages which are not formed readily under in vivo conditions- The precursors and conjugates of the herein invention appear to home to monocytes, as is described below. It appears that monocytes and macrophages are an appropriate target for an antiviral agent directed to HIV and other retroviral infection. In AIDS patients, evidence of HIV-I infection has been observed in monocytes from a variety of tissues, including brain, peripheral blood, lymph nodes, skin, and lung (Pauza, CD., et al, J Virol (1988) j2_: (in press); pauza, CD., Cell Immunol (1988) 112:414-424) and human peripheral blood monocytes and monocyte-derived cell lines support viral replication in vitro. In addition, two other immunosuppressive retroviruses, MLDV and the Visna virus of ungulates, cause immunosuppression primarily by infecting monocytes. Others have shown that monocytes act as a reservoir for virus in infection (Ho, D., et al, New Eng J Med (1987) 317:278-286; Klatzmann, D. , et al, Immunol Today (1986) l_: 2S l-23 ~ ) . Since few T-cells are actually infected with HIV-I in AIDS patients, and since it is known that infected monocytes can shed HIV-I envelope protein in soluble form, it is inferred that infected monocytes may mediate the loss of helper T-cells in these patients (Siliciano, R.F., et al, Cell (1988) 54:561-575) . Some of the compounds of the present invention offer the capability of self-assembly in vivo and offer the capability to interfere with the life cycle of retroviruses in general, probably through interference with the activity of reverse transcriptase, and are thus useful as prophylactic and therapeutic agents in the treatment of retroviral infections. Disclosure of the Invention The invention provides nontoxic precursors for conjugates capable of inhibiting HIV infection in human subjects, as well as relatively notoxic conjugates capable of inhibiting retroviral infection in human and animal subjects. The precursors are capable of self-assembly after administration selectively at the locus of HIV infection to form conjugates which are toxic to the virus. —D— This permits the treatment of patients with materials which are biologically safe to the subject, which nevertheless become toxic to the target infection when assembled at the appropriate site. Because the assembly is largely restricted to the locus of the target virus, any toxic side effects of the assembled conjugate to the patient being treated are minimized. The conjugates administered per se are also toxic to the retrovirus, and appear to inhibit reverse-transcriptase. Thus, in one aspect, the invention is directed to a method to treat retroviral, such as HIV viral infection, which method comprises administering to a subject in need of such treatment amounts of precursors which will result in the assembly of an effective amount of conjugate in situ, which conjugate is effective in interrupting the virus infection. In another aspect, the invention is directed to the conjugates obtained. These conjugates are derivatives of the commercially available nontoxic dye, Lucifer Yellow CH, (LY-CH) and its analogs. In general, the conjugates are of the formula: R-NHCONHN=CH-Y-CH=NNHCONH-R (1) wherein R is of the formula: o 3 s wherein Z represents one or two noninterfering substituents, and ~Y is selected from the group consisting of the linking moieties shown in Figure 2. The conjugates are formed by the in situ re¬ action of precursors of the formula: R-NHCONHN=CH-Y-CHO (2) and R-NHCONHNH 2 (3) wherein R and Y are as above defined. Accordingly, in one aspect, as described above, the invention is directed to a method to treat retroviral, such as HIV infection in human subjects, wherein the method comprises administering to the appropriate subject precursors of antiviral conjugate of formula (1) wherein the precursors have the formulas (2) and (3), wherein R and Y are as above defined and wherein these precursors are capable of self-assembly in the presence of virus- susceptible or virus-infected cells. In another aspect, the invention is directed to pharmaceutical compositions containing the precursors having formulas (2) and (3) and to certain novel substances useful in preparing the compositions and in treatment of the infection. In still another aspect, the invention is directed to a method to treat or prevent retroviral infection in humans or other animals, which method comprises administering to a subject in need of such treatment an amount of a conjugate shown below which is effective in interrupting or preventing the virus infection. In another aspect, the invention is directed to these conjugates and the pharmaceutical compositions containing them. These conjugates are derivatives of the commercially available nontoxic dye, Lucifer Yellow CH, (LY-CH) and its analogs. In general, the conjugates are of the formula: wherein R is a LY-CH or analog residue as above defined, R 1 is H or alkyl (1-6C); and R 2 is alkyl (1-6C) or aryl (6-10C) or "linked" aryl (6-10C) containing 2-5 such aryl groups, said alkyl or aryl substituents being unsubstituted or substituted by 1-2 non-interfering groups. Some typical embodiments for 2 R are shown in Figure 4. In still another aspect, the invention is directed to a method to prepare the compounds of Formula (4) which comprises contacting a compound of the formula RNHCONHNH 2 with a compound of the formula R 1R2CO, and recovering the resulting conjugate. Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 shows representative analogs of the compound suramin sodium. Suramin sodium is shown in this figure as Structure A. Figure 2 shows embodiments of the moiety Y in the precursors and conjugates of the invention. Figure 3 shows the synthesis of precursors A1-A9 and conjugates H1-H9. Figure 4 shows typical embodiments of the moiety 2 R m the conjugates of the invention. Figure 5 shows the synthesis of the conjugate A4. Figure 6 shows the effect of A4 and suramin on inhibition of reverse-transcriptase isolated from Hiv-l. Figure 7 shows the effect of suramin and A4 to inhibit reverse transcriptase isolated from feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) . Figure 8 shows the inhibition of growth of FIV in feline kidney cells by the invention compound A4. Figure 9 shows the effect of A4 on the viability of infected feline cells containing FIV. Figure 10 shows the results of fluorescence activated-cell sorting (FACS) demonstrating that A4 is taken up and retained by a human macrophage-like cell line U937. Modes of Carrying Out the Invention A. Nature of the Precursors and Conjugates The conjugates formed in situ and the precursors thereof are derived from the nontoxic commercially avail¬ able dye Lucifer Yellow (LY-CH)or its analogs. LY-CH has the formula: NHCONHNH ^ NH, and is thus a semicarbazide. The commercially available material is in the form of the lithium salt; however, other salts of the sulfonates, or even the free acid forms, can be used in the formulation. Of course, the ionization status of the sulfonate will depend on the pH of the medium which surrounds it. Suitable salts for use when the compound is to administered therapeutically include any nontoxic, inorganic ions, such as sodium, potassium, ammonium, calcium, magnesium, and so forth, or may also ETe organic cations, such as quaternary amines. In general, inorganic ions are preferred, as these confer greater solubility on the compounds and are less expensive. The free acid form can also be used in the manufacture of a suitable formulation which will adjust the pH to a physiologically compatible value. By "analogs" of the Lucifer Yellow moiety is meant compounds of the formula: NHCONHNH LY-analog wherein Z represents one or two innocuous substituents in either ring such as lower alkyl, lower alkoxy, hydroxy, amino, thio, alkylamino, alkylthio, or halo. The nature of Z is not important in these analogs so long as it does not interfere with the self-assembly, with the efficacy of the conjugate, or with the non-toxicity of the precursor. Thus, by "analogs" of Lucifer Yellow, is meant those naphthalene disulfonates related to Lucifer Yellow which have different substituents in the naphthalene nucleus other than the single amino group present in Lucifer Yel¬ low itself. As is the case with Lucifer Yellow, the analog sulfonates may be in the form of the free acid or any pharmaceutically acceptable salt. With respect to the self-assembling hydrazones, calculations based on the known uptake characteristics of LY-CH, the relative volumes of endosomes and lysosomes inside cells, and various kinetic parameters known to describe formation of hydrazones, it can be calculated that antiviral concentrations of the product hydrazone can be obtained inside monocyte lysosomes using sub-cytotoxic concentrations of the precursors, and without forming appreciable conjugate outside of the monocyte. These calculations are done manually or using computer simulation. In addition, verification of the various parameters for either the self-assembling hydrazones or preferred semicarbazones can be obtained using a model system in cats involving feline immunosuppressive virus (FIV) which is a T-lymphotropic lentivirus, wherein the virus can infect feline T-lymphocytes, feline peripheral monocytes derived macrophages and CCL94 feline kidney- derived fibroblasts in vitro. As the symptoms of FIV are similar to those of AIDS infections in humans, this provides a suitable model system for HIV and for retroviral infection in general (Pederson, N. C, et al, Science (1987) 235:790-793; Elder, J., (198.8, personal communication) ) . The cytotoxicity of Lucifer Yellow and the analogs within the scope of the invention is low. The LD 40 for LY-CH injected intravenously in mice is greater than 1 g/kg (Silverstein, S., (1987, personal communica¬ tion) ) and LY-CH exhibits no observable cytostatic activ¬ ity in vitro against murine thiol-macrophages at 600 uM concentrations (Swanson, J.A. , et al, J Cell Biol (1985) 100:851-859) . Preferred forms of the precursors include those wherein R represents the tricyclic residue of Lucifer Yellow-i.e., Z is NH-- at the position shown. Preferred embodiments of Y are those represented by formulas 1-4 of Figure 2, and in particular, most preferred is that represented by formula 2-2 of Figure 2. Thus, particularly preferred as precursors are Lucifer Yellow CH itself, in the form of any pharmaceutically acceptable salt, as the compound of formula 3, and the compound designated A2 herein, of the formula: which is a condensation product of LY-CH with the benzene- 1,3-dialdehyde, as the compound of formula (2). When conjugated with LY-CH, the conjugate has the formula designated H2: Thus, a series of preferred precursors and conjugates are constructed wherein the compound of formula (3) is a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of Lucifer Yellow and the compound of formula (2) is derived from Lucifer Yellow and Y of the various formulas shown in Figure 2. These compounds of formula (2) are designated A1-A9, wherein these precursors result in conjugates with LY-CH to give the corresponding dihydrazones (semicarbazones) of formulas HI through H9. The synthesis of all of these embodiments is outlined in Figure 3. As shown in Figure 3, the dialdehyde of the embodiments of Y shown as formulas 1-9 in Figure 2 is first prepared and reacted with 1 molar equivalent of Lucifer Yellow to obtain the precursors Al- A9; subsequent reaction with the other precursor, LY-CH results in the toxic and antiviral conjugates H1-H9. The reaction with the second mole of LY-CH, of course, can, in the preferred case, take place in situ. With respect to the simple hydrazones (semicarbazones) of Formula 4, preferred forms of the conjugates also include those wherein R represents the tricyclic residue of Lucifer Yellow—i.e., Z is NH- at the position shown. Preferred embodiments of R are H and lower alkyl (1-4), most preferably H. By alkyl is meant a saturated hydrocarbyl of the indicated number of carbon atoms which is in a straight or branch chain form, such as methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, i-propyl, t-butyl, n-butyl, i-hexyl, n-hexyl, and 3-methylpentyl. With respect to R 2, although R2 can be alkyl, expecially if R 1 is not H, conjugates in which R2 is aryl are preferred. By aryl is meant a 6-10 membered monocyclic or fused bicyclic ring system which has aromatic character. The ring may contain only carbons as ring members, or may contain one or more heteroatoms such as N. The aryl substituents are, thus, typically, moieties such as phenyl, pyridyl, napthyl, quinolyl, pyrimidyl, and the like. The aryl substituents may contain 1-2 nonhydrogen substitutions which do not interfere with the pharmacological effect of the conjugate. Typical substituents include, but are not limited to, lower alkyl, lower alkoxy, hydroxy, amino, thio, alkyl amino, alkyl thio, halo, carboxy, carbalkoxy, or CHO. 2 The substituent R may also include multiple "linked" aryl (or, perhaps, more properly, arylene) substituents wherein a total of 1-5 aryl moieties of 6-IOC are linked through nonaromatic substituents or through a covalent b " ond to form an extended chain of aryl groups. Perhaps the simplest example of this is the embodiment of 2 R which is biphenyl wherein two phenyl groups are linked through a single covalent bond. Other examples of this type of "necklace" of aryl moieties is found in Figure 4, wherein in some instances phenyl groups are linked through -CONH- or -NHCONH-. Other types of linkage include hydrocarbylene linkages and conjugation-type linkages through -CH=CH-. As is the case for a single aryl substituent, the aryl groups forming the extended chain may be substituted with 1-2 noninterfering substituents. A particularly preferred substituent is -CHO. Particularly preferred also are those embodiments wherein at least two linked aryl groups are present in the 2 substituent R , and most preferred is the substituent which is a substituted biphenyl shown as Formula 4-4 in Figure 4. Thus, particularly preferred as conjugates are those derived from Lucifer Yellow CH itself, including those in the form of any pharmaceutically acceptable salt, and the compound of the formula: 0HC~<Q)-{QW i . e . , those of the formula The synthesis of A4 from commercially available reagents is outlined in Figure 5. As shown in Figure 5, the commercially available compound 4,4'-dicyanobiphenyl is reduced in DIBAL and hydrolyzed to obtain the dialdehyde. The dialdehyde is then reacted with the lithium salt of Lucifer Yellow in a controlled reaction to obtain the single conjugate A4, which is then isolated using standard chromatographic methods. The lithium salt, is, if desired, converted to alternate pharmaceutically acceptable nontoxic salts. B. Selectivity for Monocytes and Derivatives Lucifer Yellow itself is a nontoxic, fluorescent, membrane-impermeable dye (Stewart, W.W., Cell (1978) JL4_:741) which is taken up by monocyte/macrophage endosomes through pinocytosis and is concentrated in the lysosomes. The rate of pinocytosis and accumulation in lysosomes is higher for macrophages, especially activated macrophages, than for other cell types such as fibroblasts (Besterman, J.M. , et al, J Cell Biol (1981) 91:916-917; Steinman, R.M., et al, J Cell Biol (1976) £:665-687) and does not bind to proteins to a substantial degree. The analogs of Lucifer Yellow which are within the scope of this invention exhibit similar properties. Because no specific receptor interaction is involved in the uptake of Lucifer Yellow by monocytes, these analogs which retain the membrane impermeable nature of LY-CH are similarly taken up by the lysosomes. In addition, unlike suramin, the LY-CH and analog-derived precursors of the invention are not bound to serum proteins. Thus, their bioavailability is not diminished in this way. Thus, the selectivity of precursors and conjugates derived from Lucifer Yellow and its analogs are expected to home to the virus-tropic cells, such as monocytes, rather than to the non-tropic cells, for example neutrophils. In addition, as the Lucifer Yellow- derived materials are concentrated in the lysosomes, where the pH is relatively low (4-5) reaction to form the hydrazone or semicarbazone is favored. As described in PCT application WO88/00047, incorporated herein by reference, concentration of the precursors in the desired target cells results in a magnified selectivity when the toxic material is formed by a second order reaction from the precursors. Thus, for example, a three-fold higher concentration of each precursor in the target cells as compared to other destinations would result in a nine-fold concentration differential between the target and the remaining tissues. In the present application, this is enhanced by the favorable conditions found in the targets for formation of the conjugate-i.e. , the conditions are such that the rate constant for the forward reaction is increased. C Formulation and Administration As the components are to be administered as pharmaceuticals, they are formulated in a conventional manner and administered either localized at the targeted site or sytemically. As is generally the case for self- assembling, pharmaceutically active products, administra¬ tion at the intended site of activity enhances the as- sembly of the biologically active conjugate by the high local concentrations of the components, and diffusion of the components away from the target site automatically diminishes their tendency to combine. Generally known methods of formulation are employed, including sustained- release matrices, conventional excipients, and simple solutions, as described, for example, in Remington 's Pharmaceutical Sciences (latest edition), Mack Publishing Company, Easton, Pennsylvania. In some instances, the conjugate formed by the precursors of the invention can be administered in a form in which conjugation has already taken place. Thus, the resulting pharmaceutically active conjugate can itself be formulated and administered to the patient. However, it is preferable to administer the pre¬ cursors separately, either simultaneously and in the same location, or in different locations at the same time, or in the same location at different times. Systemic administration is feasible in using the precursors as treatment for HIV infection, since it is known that LY-CH is taken up and concentrated in the endosomes and lysosomes of macrophages. This has been reported for murine thiol-elicited macrophages. These organelles have lower pH (about 5), thus enhancing the production of the conjugated semicarbazone. This results in a concentration of the conjugate in T-cells which contact macrophages, as opposed to kidney or other parts of the body. The compound thus tends to accumulate and react in locations where the virus infection is likely to be found. The dosage level required depends, of course, on the choice of specific end-products and/or components. For most embodiments, a dosage of the conjugate on the order of 0.1-5 g/week appears suitable; for LY-CH and the complementary preferred compounds set forth above, i.e., the precursors administration of 100mg-3g/week of each component is appropriate. The preformed conjugates can be administered intravenously, intramuscularly, orally, or intraperitoneally, at about 1-1000 mg/kg body weight. The dosage level required depends, of course, on the choice of specific conjugate, as well as the nature of the subject being treated for retroviral infection and the magnitude of the infection or the potential therefor. Administration may have either therapeutic or prophylactic effects or both. For most embodiments, a dosage of the conjugate on the order of 0.1-5 g/week appears suitable. In a preferred approach, by derivatizing the precursors so as to administer them in particulate form, for example, by conjugating them to a carbohydrate, selec¬ tive killing of the macrophage cells which harbor the virus can " be accomplished. Because the drugs are perceived as particles, they will be readily attacked by the macrophages. The following examples are intended to il¬ lustrate, but not to limit, the invention. Example 1 Effect of Precursors and Conjugates on HIV The test culture system uses MT-2 cells, which are a T-cell-derived leukemic cell line derived from a person infected with HTLV-1 (Rich an, D.D., et al, J Exp Med (1987) 166:1144-1149) . When these cells are cultured and then infected with HIV-1, they form multinucleated macrocells called syncitia by self-fusion. These syncitia can be observed microscopically and quantitated. Infected cell stock is prepared by adding HIV to 10 ml MT-2 cell suspension containing 6 x 10 cells/ml in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, polybrene, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 U/ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal calf serum. To 10 ml of MT-2 suspension is added 60 ul of HIV virus concentrate (10 7 "tissue 50% infectious disease units" /ml, strain 5735). Solutions of the precursor or conjugate to be tested at 2x their final concentration were diluted with the infected cell stock in 24 well tissue culture plates. 100 ul each of the drug stock and infected cell stock were used. After 3-4 days incubation at 37°C, 5% C0-, 100% humidity, the cells were checked, for syncitia formation and rated on a scale from zero (no syncitia) to four (a maximum viral cytopathic effect—i.e., no antiviral activ- ity). Lucifer Yellow-CH concentrations of 10 uM, 40 uM and 200 uM were tested; all showed no antiviral effect and received a " rating of 4; LY-CH was not antiviral even at 800 uM. A2 was tested at 10 uM, 40 uM and 200 uM; there was no antiviral effect at the two lower concentrations, but a siight effect (a rating of 3) at 200 uM; at 400 uM and 800 UM A2 completely inhibited syncitia formation. When the drug contained a combination of 100 uM LY plus 100 uM A2, a marked antiviral effect (0 and 1 in two separate determinations) was found. Lower concentration levels of the combined precursors (20 uM and 5 uM of each) gave no antiviral effect. In the foregoing results, stock solutions used to prepare the combination drugs at concentrations of 10- fold the final concentration of the drug solution added to the wells were incubated together at 25 C for an hour before dilution to begin the incubation with the cell cultures. In a subsequent experiment, conducted similarly, this recombination was not done, so no conjugation prior to addition to the culture could occur. Under these conditions, higher concentrations of the combinations were required. Concentrations of 100 uM A2 plus 100 uM LY-CH in this assay, without precombination, did not show an antiviral effect. However, when the concentration of both components was raised to 200 uM, a moderate (2-3) antiviral effect was exhibited, and combinations where both concentrations were 400 uM were strongly antiviral (0). However, 400 uM A2 alone and 800 uM A2 also show pronounced antiviral effects, and 200 uM A2 alone, a moderate one (3). At all concentrations of LY-CH tested (100-800 uM) no antiviral effect was found. Similar assays, but using HIV viral antigen expression in MDM as criterion for antiviral activity, • were conducted. In these assays, the expression was rated from 0 (complete inhibition) to 180 (no drug effect) . In this assay, the following results were obtained, as shown in Table 1: 100 uM LY + 100 uM A2 83 As shown in the table, according to this assay, the effect of LY can be dramatically enhanced by the addi¬ tion of A2. None of the compounds used was cytotoxic at the concentrations used hereinabove to either cat kidney epithelial cells after 4 days or to human monocyte-derived macrophages after 5 days. However, preincubated 150 uM A2+250 uM LY-CH resulted in 50% inhibition of all growth over periods where unreacted components showed no effect. Example 2 Effect of A4 on HIV and FIV Compound A4 was first tested for its ability to inhibit reverse transcriptase isolated either from HIV-1 or from FIV using a standard protocol. The results are shown in Figures 6 and 7 for HIV-1 and FIV respectively. In each case, A4 was more potent than suramin in inhibiting the enzyme. The approximate IC,- 0 values are 200 uM against HIV-1 and 20 uM against FIV. A4 was also tested for its ability to inhibit the growth of FIV in a culture containing feline kidney cells using standard assays. As shown in Figure 8, using a concentration of 30 ug/ml A4, FIV growth and proliferation were virtually completely inhibited within 20 days following infection; administration of 20 ug/ml A4 resulted in corresponding inhibition 40 days thereafter. Smaller concentrations had similar effects but were less dramatic. The results in Figure 9 show the effect of A4 (20 ug/ml) on the viability of infected cells. This concentration of A4 was able to reestablish 100% viability of the infected cells within 50 days of infection. Finally, Figure 10 shows that the macrophage cell line U937 takes up and retains A4. In an in vivo test, compound A4 was injected into two mice intraperitoneally at a dose of 60 mg/kg. No apparent toxicity was evident 15 days later, showing that the conjugate is relatively non-toxic.

Claims: Claims "1. A method to treat retroviral infection in human subjects which method comprises administering to a subject in need of such treatment the precursors of an antiviral conjugate wherein said conjugate is of the formula: R-NHCONHN=CH-Y-CH=NNHCONH-R (1) wherein R has the formula: in which Z represents one or two non-interfering substituents, Y is selected from the group consisting of the moieties shown as 2-1 to 2-9 in Figure 2; and wherein said precursors are capable of self- assembly into the conjugate in the presence of virus- infected or virus-susceptible cells. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the precursors are of the formula: R-NHCONHN=CH-Y-CHO (2) and R-NHC0NHNH o (3) wherein R and Y are as defined in claim 1. The method of claim 1 wherein R is NH, as the pharmaceutically acceptable salt. 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the precursors of formulas (3) and (2) are LY-CH and A2, and the conjugate is H2. A compound of the formula: R-NHCONHN=CH-Y-CH=NNHCONHR wherein R has the formula: in which Z represents one or two non-interfering substituents, and Ϋ is selected from the group consisting of the moieties shown as 2-1 to 2-9 in Figure 2. 6. A pharmaceutical composition useful in the treatment of HIV infection which contains, as active ingredients, precursors of a compound of the formula: R-NHCONHN=CH-Y-CH=NNHCONHR wherein R has the formula: in which Z represents one or two non-interfering substituents, Y is selected from the group consisting of the moieties shown as 2-1 to 2-9 in Figure 2; wherein said precursors are capable of self- assembly into the conjugate in the presence of virus- infected cells. 7. A pharmaceutical composition useful in the treatment of retroviral infection which contains, as active ingredients, compounds of the formula: R-NHCONHN=CH-Y-CHO ( 2 ) and -R-NHCONHNH,, ( 3 ) wherein R has the formula: in which Z represents one or two non-interfering substituents, Y is selected from the group consisting of the moieties shown as 2-1 to 2-9 in Figure 2. 8. A method to treat or prevent retroviral infection in an animal subject which method comprises administering to a subject in need of such treatment or prevention an antiviral conjugate of the formula: R' R-NHCONHN=C (4) wherein R has the formula: in which Z represents one or two non-interfering substituents; and wherein R is H or alkyl (1-6C); and R 2 is alkyl (1-6C) or aryl (6-10C) or linked aryl (6-10C) containing 2-5 such aryl groups, said alkyl or aryl substituents being unsubstituted or substituted by 1-2 non-interfering groups; or the pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. 9. The method of claim 8 wherein the conjugate is of the formula: R-NHCONHN=CH- wherein R is as defined in claim 8 10. The method of claim 9 wherein the conjugate is of the formula or the pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. 11. A compound of the formula: R-NHCONHN=C (4) wherein R has the formula: in which Z represents one or two non-interfering substituents, and " wherein R is H or alkyl (1-6C); and R is alkyl (1-6C) or aryl (6-10C) or linked aryl (6-10C) containing 2-5 such aryl groups, said alkyl or aryl substituents being unsubstituted or substituted by 1-2 non-interfering groups; or the pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. 12. - A pharmaceutical composition useful in the prevention or treatment of retroviral infection which contains, as active ingredient, an effective amount of the compound of claim 11. 13. A method to synthesize a compound of the formula „2 R-NHCONHN=C R J which method comprises contacting a compound of the formula R-NHCONHNH, wherein R is as above defined, with a compound of the formula wherein R 1 and R2 are as above defined; and recovering the compound of Formula (4).

Inventors: ELDER JOHN, RIDEOUT DARRYL C, ELDER, JOHN, RIDEOUT, DARRYL, C.
Applicants: SCRIPPS CLINIC RES, SCRIPPS CLINIC AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Application year: 1989
Main classification: A61K31
IPC codes: A61K31, A61P31, C07D221