COMPOSITIONS FOR BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF PLANT PATHOGENIC NEMATODES

Abstract: Soybean meal and urea compositions have been found to exhibit enhanced and commercially useful nematistatic and nematicidal activity in soils. Chitin-protein complex containing materials, e.g., crab shells, shrimp shell, fungal mycelia, etc., and/or ammonium phosphate have also been found to exhibit enhanced and commercially useful nematistatic and nematicidal activity in soils when admixed with said soybean meal-urea compositions.

Description: COMPOSITIONS FOR BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF PLANT PATHOGENIC NEMATODES FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to methods for optimizing the functional properties and use of compositions of organic matter for the biological " control of plant pathogens in soils. More particularly, the invention relates to unconventional methods for using specific organic nitrogen and organic carbon materials to formulate optimized and e©st-βffeetive soil amend¬ ments which have a low ea^feon:nitrogen (C:N) ratio and a high Kjeldahl "protein" content, are not phytotoxic, and render plant-pathogenic nematodes and/or their eggs susceptible to destruction by native soil microorganisms and thus act indirectly as biological control agents to suppress nematode populations in soils. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Man has added organic and inorganic amendments to soil for centuries to improve soil fertility and increase crop yield. The nematicidal effects of some of these amendments have been recognized for some time and reviews on the subject have been published; β.tfςr;; R. RodrigΛiez-Kabana, J. Nematol. 18:129-135 (1986) and R. Rodriguez-Kabana, G. Morgan- ones and I. Chβt, Plant and Soil. 100:237-247 (1987), the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. Particularly noteworthy is page 239 of this article, which discloses that organic soil amendments are nematicidal when the C:N ratio is less than 20, but the amendments are phytotoxic when the C:N ratio drops below 11. While most nematicidal soil amendments are oil-cakes and meals or manures and composts, it has also been found that gome ©gganie nitrogenous amend¬ ments, especially ese with low earfeeajni regen (C:N) ratios and high "protein" contents as measured by Kjeldahl nitrogen methods, act when added in quantity to soils as if they were toxins for nema¬ todes. Most interesting among these organic nitroge¬ nous amendments for control of plant-pathogenic soil nematodes are materials which contain ammoniacal nitrogen, such as urea (e.g., see J.T. Walker, J. Nematoloαv. 3,:43-49 (1971)) and materials which contain chitin and related mucopolysaccharides (e.g., see M.B. Linford, F. Yap and J.M. Oliviera, Soil Science. 45:127-141 (1938); R. Mitchell and M. Alexander, Plant Pis. Reporter. 45.:487 (July 15, 1961); Soil Sc. Soc.. 26:556-558 (1962); I.H. Mian, G. Bodoy, R.A. Shelby, R. Rodriguez-Kabana and G. Morgan-Jones, Nematropica, 12:71-84 (1982); G. Godoy, R. Rodriguez-Kabana, R.A. Shelby and G. Morgan-Jones, Nematropica. .13_:63-74 (1983); R. Rodriguez-Kabana, G. Morgan-Jones and B. Ownley Gintis, Nematropica. .14:10-25 (1984) and A.K. Culbreath, R. Rodriguez-Kabana and G. Morgan-Jones, Nematropica. .16:153-166 (1986). See also McCandliss, Eastwood and Milch, U.S. Pat. No 4,536,207). _ J.T. Walker, J. Nematolocrv. 1 : 193-280 (1969) studied the nematicidal effects of soil amendments with soybean meal and of soil amend¬ ments with urea, but this reference does not discuss soil amendments with both urea and soybean meal. Urea has been demonstrated to be a good nemati- cide at high application rates (e.g., ≥ 300 mg N/kg soil) but it is also phytotoxic at these levels owing to its low C:N ratio. Detrimental effects of high soil concentrations of urea can be overcome, however, by supplementing urea amendments with additional available carbon required to ensure adequate stimula¬ tion in soils of microbial metabolic activity (See, for example: Huebner, Dissertation: Hemicellulosic Waste and Urea for Control of Plant Parasitic Nema¬ odea, Order No. DA8212687, Auburn University (1982), Chemistry Abstracts. 97:67774b; R. Rodriguez-Kabana and P.S. King, Nematropica. .10:38-44 (1980); and R.A. Huebner, R. Rodriguez-Kabana and R.M. Patterson, Nematropica. .13:37-54 (1983). It is known to prepare a fertilizer by combining urea with soybean meal (see, e.g., Keysβner et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 1,857,914 and Baskin, U.S. Pat. No. 3,558,299). Soybean meal compositions have been disclosed for use in the control of nematodes, but these references do not teach the use of urea in combina¬ tion with soybean meal (see, e.g., Walker, supra; Kodama et al, U.S. Pat. No. 3,660,571; McBrayer, U.S. Pat. No. 4,442,092 (sesame meal instead of soybean meal); Carlile et al, U.S. Pat. 'No. 434,243 (cotton¬ seed meal instead of soybean meal; control of insects and cut-worm instead of nematodes); McCandliss et al, U.S. Pat. No. 4,536,207 (shellfish waste instead of soybean meal)). SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to compositions and formulations of matter which are useful suppres¬ sants of plant-pathogenic nematode populations when added to plant growth media, and to methods for the use thereof. Thus, the present invention covers the following categories of nematicidal or nematistatic composit¬ ions: (A) soybean meal-urea compositions, which can optionally further comprise (A-l) chitin-protein complex or (A-2) another am oniacal nitrogen source. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a graph plotting C:N ratio against Kjeldahl protein (%), illustrating the combination of low C:N ratio of below 4 with high Kjeldahl protein (%) of at least 70% in the preferred chitin-protein complex, urea, soybean meal formulations described in one embodiment herein. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION All percentages and ratios herein are by weight unless otherwise stated. A wide variety Pf plant pathogenic nematodes can be controlled in accordance with the present inven¬ tion. Such nematodes can be endoparasitic and include but are not limited to those selected from the group consisting of root-knot nematodes of the Meloidoqvne genus, root-lesion nematodes of the Pratylenchus genus, cyst-formiiig nematodes of the Heterodera or Globodera genus, citrus nematodes of the Tylenchulus genus, reniform nematodes of the Rotylenchulus genus, and burrowing nematodes ©f the Radopholus genus. The plant pathogenic nematode can be ectoparasitic, including but not limited to those selected from the group consisting of dagger nema¬ todes- of the Xiphinema genus, stubby-root nematodes of the TrichodoruB genus, spiral nematodes of the Rotylenchus or Helicotylenchus genus, sting nematodes of the Belonolaimus genus, and pin nematodes of the ParatylenchuB genus. Alternatively, the plant pathogenic nematode can include one or more genus selected from the group consisting of leaf nematodes of the Aphelenchoides genus and bulb and stem nema¬ todes of the Dutyl ' enchus genus. A. The Soybean Meal-Urea Compositions In the soybean meal-urea compositions of this invention, the ratio by weight of soybean meal to urea provided by a source thereof (within the present inventions, the term "urea" is often used to mean "source of urea", i.e., any of the well known inor¬ ganic or organic substances usable in agriculture as a source of urea are employable herein, such as isobutyldienediurea (IBDU), croto ' nylidiene diurea (CDU), difurforylidene triureide, oxalyldiuride and triuret is about 2:1 to 8:1, preferably about 2:1 to 6:1. The total C:N ratio of the soybean meal-urea composition is below about 5, preferably below about 4, with a nitrogen content (%) of about 12 to 22% preferably about 1J3 to 20%, corresponding to a Kjeldahl protein of over about 70%^, about 75 to 137.5%, preferably about 81.25 to 125%. The actual amounts in weight of soybean meal and urea or source of urea material in the soybean meal-urea composi¬ tions of this invention are such to provide in practice about 1 to 3 grams of soybean meal plus urea per kilogram of soil in which said composition is admixed. These application values roughly translate to about 1 to 3 tons of soybean meal plus urea per treated acre (on a broadcasted or banded basis) based on admixture to a depth of about 6 inches. For part or all of the soybean meal, there can be substituted other vegetable, fruit and nut meals such as cottonseed meal, sunflower seed meal, linseed meal, peanut meal, safflower meal, corn gluten meal, jojoba meal, sesame meal, dried citrus pulp, dehy¬ drated or sun-cured alfalfa, etc. The soybean meal and urea compositions of this invention can be prepared by dry blending or through pellet formation as described hereinafter. A-l. The Chitin-Containinα Compositions The chitin-protein complex can be derived from arthropod exoskeleton shells, especially those wherein the arthropod is a chelicerata or a mandibu- lata. Alternatively, the chitin-protein complex is derived from a microorganism containing said glucos- amine, especially a microorganism which is a waste product from an industrial fermentation process; preferably, such a microorganism is a filamentous fungus and the source of the glucosamine is its mycelium, especially when the microorganism is one from a citric acid or antibiotic-producing fermenta¬ tion process. Further, a mixture of both arthropod and microorganism sources, preferably from sources wherein the arthropqd is a crustacean and the micro¬ organism is a filamentous fungus, can be used. The chitin-protein complex can be obtained by demineral- ization- of crustacean shells as described in U.S. 4,536,207. In this preferred embodiment, using chitin-protein complex - urea - soybean meal as an example, the proportion of chitin-protein complex to urea to meal is about 1.5 to 3.5 parts chitin-protein complex and about 3.0 to 5.0 parts meal, each to about 1.0 part urea. Most preferably, the ratio of chitin-protein complex:urea:soybean meal is about 2.5:1:4.0 as found in ClandoSan 618, formulated to contain about 25% chitin-protein complex, about 10% urea and about 40% soybean meal. Pulverized crab meal and demealed crab shell contain about 50% chitin-protein complex, while demineralized shell contains about 75% chitin-protein complex. The chitin-containing compositions preferably contain a total C:N ratio of about 1:1 to about 6:1, preferably about 4:1 or less, with at least 50%, preferably at least 80% of the C:N ratio coming from organic sources. Furthermore, the Kjeldahl "protein" content is at least about 25%, preferably at least about 70% and most preferably over 80%. A.2 Other Ammoniacal Nitrogen Source Composi¬ tions Materials such as ammonium phosphates can be substituted for all or part of the chitin-protein complex of embodiment A-l. TABLE 1 CLANDOSAN R (CHITIN-PROTEIN) BIOLOGICAL CONTROL MATERIALS 601 1220 107 20 CRUSTACEAN (BLUE CRAB) SOURCE: SBM = SOYBEAN MEAL TABLE A CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMPONENTS OF CLANDOSAN R (CHITIN-PROTEIN) BIOLOGICAL CONTROL MATERIALS HORSE- SOYBEAN DIAMMONIUM UNPROCESSED FUNGAL SHOE PANAMA MEAL (SBM) UREA PHOSPHATE CRAB MEAL MYCELIUM CRAB SHRIMP CHITIN CHITOSAN DESCRIPTION: PROXIMATE ANALYSIS (%) Moisture 6.7 13.2 Ash 6.1 44.6 m Organic Matter 87.2 42.2 ttxA ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS (%) T Carbon (Total) 42.1 26.0 Carbon (Organic) 42.1 21.9 rn Hydrogen 6.8 4.5 ω Oxygen 34.5 33.0 Nitrogen (Kjeldahl) 7.8 4.4 m m Calcium 0.3 13.9 Phosphorus 0.6 1.4 Magnesium 0.3 0.6 Sodium 0.0 1.6 Potassium 1.7 0.4 CARBON:NITROGEN ANALYSIS Total C:N Ratio 5.3 5.2 Organic C:N Ratio 5.3 4.4 Kjeldahl "Protein" (%) 48.8 27.3 Application of the Compositions A nematicidal or nematistatic composition of the present invention is employed by admixing it with a suitable plant growth medium, e.g., soil containing both inorganic clay minerals and organic humus substances, and the admixture preferably extends to the root zone of a selected crop growing therein. For horticultural applications, the plant growth medium is generally a potting soil; although inorgan¬ ic growth media can in principle be employed, they must contain the requisite microflora or the desired effect will not be achieved. For east of application and ensuring a gradual release of ammoniaeal nitrogen, it is preferred that the composition be applied in the form of granules, pellets or prills. In its method aspect, the present invention admixes at least a nematistatically effective and non-phy o oxic amount of the desired amendment with a suitable plant growth medium to suppress the growth of the plant-pathogenic nematodes. Preferably, the admixing is done at least one week prior to seeding or planting in the plant growth medium. On a commer¬ cial scale, these compositions are plowed and har¬ rowed, tilled, rototilled or otherwise mixed into the topsoil (Horizon A) and subsoil (Horizon B) layers of agricultural soils and into all layers of potting and nursery stock soils, preferably 1-3 weeks before planting of living seeds or seedlings and tree saplings in order to stimulate the growth and prolif¬ eration of actinomyces and other normal soil microor¬ ganisms which produce enhanced levels of chitinase and urease enzyme activity and enhanced levels of ammonia in these soils. 1 Example 1 Fertilizer and Nematicidal Effects of Soybean Meal and Urea Compositions Effects of amending nematode-infested soils were determined using urea soil amendment concentrations of 0.25 to 1.00 gram per kilogram soil (0.025 - 0.10%' w/w) and soybean meal amendments at concentrations of 1.0 to 4.0 grams per kilogram soil (0.1 - 0.4% w/w). Amended and control soils were placed in polyvi- nyl chloride cylindrical pots (10 cm diameter, 1 liter volume) and the pots were allowed to stand from 1-3 weeks on a greenhouse table to permit partial decomposition of the amendments by soil microorganisms. Amended and untreated soils were disposed in the greenhouse in a completely randomized arrangement. Eight replica'tions (pots) were used for each soil amendment, or treatment. First Planting: After this 1-3 week "incubation" period, five "Summer (or, Yellow) Crookneck" squash (Cucurbita pepo L. ) seeds were planted in each pot. The plants were watered daily and were then removed from the soil and two 100 cc sample of soil were taken from each pot. The first sample was used to determine nematode numbers using the "salad bowl" incubation method described by Rodriguez-Kabana and Pope, Nestitropica. .11:175-185 (1981); the second sample was used for microbial and chemical analysis. Samples for microbial analysis were stored moist at 5°C prior to use. Residual soil was spread on aluminum foil to air-dry at 25-27°C after which it was stored in polyethylene bags at 4°C in the dark until further analyzed. Squash plants were washed and the number of galls caused by ^. arenaria in the roots were count¬ ed. The height of the shoot and the fresh weights of the shoots and roots were also measured. In addi¬ tion, two subjective ratings of the roots were made. The first was a root-knot galling index based on a scale of 0-10, where 0 represents no galling and 10 represents the maximum level of galling as described by Zeck, Pflanzenschutz-Nacht. 24:141-144 (1971). The second subjective rating was an evaluation of the general appearance of the. roots based on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 represents the best root condition (abundant root hairs and rootlets without necrotic tissue) and 5 represents the worst condition (roots showing rest icted development, no roofe hairs ©r fine roots, and widespread necrotic tissue). Soil pH was measured using 10 grams of air-dried soil suspended in a plastic cup containing 10 ml of demineralized water. The suspension was stirred and allowed to stand for 30 minutes after which time the pH was measured using a Model 12 Corning pH meter. Following pH determination, the soil suspension was diluted with an additional 10 ml of demineralized water, and 10 ml of the diluted suspension were centrifuged (20 minutes at 5,000 x g) for measurement of electrical conductivity. Conductivity of the supernatant was determined using a Model RC 16 B2 Industrial Instruments Wheatstone Bridge fitted with a conductivity cell (k = 1.0). Second Planting: - Following the removal of the squash plants and ■ soil samples, the remaining soil in each pot was thoroughly mixed and planted with a single four-week old "Rutgers" tomato ( vcopersicon esculentum Mill.) seedling. These were maintained as deseribed for the squash for an additional period of five t© eight weeks. After this period, the tomato plants were removed, washed, measured and evaluated as described for the squash. All data were analyzed using standard factorial analysis procedures and standard tests for statisti¬ cal significance. SQUASH PLANTED DAY 15 SQUASH HARVESTED DAY 53 CONTROL SOYBEAN MEAL SOYBEAN MEAL + UREA TABLE 2 (con't) NEMATODE SUPPRESSION AND FERTILIZER EFFECTS OF SOYBEAN MEAL-UREA COMPOSITIONS Soil Amendment Cone. (G/KG) Soil Features Galls/GM Soybean Root Top Top Conduc- Gall Plant We Fresh Root Meal Urea pN gt. Hgt. gt. tivity Rate Number %Change (GM) (CM) (GM) (GM) (% C SECOND PLANTING: TOMATOES TOMATOES PLANTED DAY 53 TOMATOES HARVESTED DAY 113 c CONTROL in SOYBEAN MEAL CD ::! c SOYBEAN MEAL + UREA m J m TABLE 3 NEMATODE SUPPRESSION EFFECTS OF SOYBEAN MEAL-UREA COMPOSITIONS IN SECOND (TOMATO) PLANTINGS Soil Amendment -NEMATODES FROM ROOTS- Cone. (G/KG) Galls/GM ROOT-KNOT LARVAE LESION Soybean Gall Fresh Root (No/GM (PRATYLENCHUS) SAPROPHAGOUS Meal Urea Rate Number ^Change (No.) Root) (No.) No./GM Root) (No.) (No./GM Ro EXPERIMENT NO. 520 SET UP DAY 0 SQUASH PLANTED DAY 16 SQUASH HARVESTED DAY 55 TOMATOES PLANTED DAY 55 TOMATOES HARVESTED DAY 128 Control 0.0 0.00 5.1 13.5 99.3 38.2 89.7 34.5 22.3 8.58 Urea 21.9 15.64 56.0 56.00 23.0 12. 11 58.5 39.00 EXPERIMENT NO. 521 SET UP DAY 0 SQUASH PLANTED DAY 15 SQUASH HARVESTED DAY 53 TOMATOES PLANTED DAY 53 TABLE 3 (con't) NEMATODE SUPPRESSION EFFECTS OF SOYBEAN MEAL-UREA COMPOSITIONS IN SECOND (TOMATO) PLANTINGS NEMATODES p ER 100 CC SOIL ROOT- KNOT SAPRO- LARVAE LESION PHAGOUS EXPERIMENT NO. 520 SET UP DAY 0 SQUASH PLANTED DAY 16 SQUASH HARVESTED DAY 55 TOMATOES PLANTED DAY 55 TOMATOES HARVESTED DAY 128 Control 16.0 13.1 119.0 Urea EXPERIMENT NO. 521 SET UP DAY 0 SQUASH PLANTED DAY 15 SQUASH HARVESTED DAY 53 TOMATOES PLANTED . DAY 53 TABLE 3 (con't) NEMATODE SUPPRESSION EFFECTS OF SOYBEAN MEAL-UREA COMPOSITIONS IN SECOND (TOMATO) PLANTINGS -NEMATODES FROM ROOTS- Soil Amendment TABLE 3 (con't) NEMATODE SUPPRESSION EFFECTS OF SOYBEAN MEAL-UREA COMPOSITIONS IN SECOND (TOMATO) PLANTINGS NEMATODES PER 100 CC SOIL ROOT- KNOT SAPRO- LARVAE LESION PHAGOUS EXPERIMENT NO. 521 (con' t) TOMATOES HARVESTED DAY 113 Control 11.8 3.4 156.1 Soybean Meal SOYBEAN + UREA 16 Example 2 Effects of Chitin and Phosphate Additions on the Nematicidal and Fertilizer Properties of Soybean Meal-Urea Compositions Effects of adding various chitin-containing waste materials obtained from shellfish (e.g., crab, - crayfish, lobster, prawns and shrimp) processing operations and from fungal mycelia residues of industrial fermentation processes (e.g., production of citric acid, antibiotics and enzymes) to soybean meal-urea compositions were studied in greenhouse experiments by the sι@th©ds deseribed in Example 1. Crabshell ehitla compositions, which are market¬ ed by IGENE Biotechnology, Inc. of Columbia, Maryland under the registered trademark ClandoSan R, were prepared from the claws and bodies of blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) after removal of edible crab meat by methods described in McCandliss, Eastwood and Milch (U.S. Pat. No. 4,536,207). Composition Description ClandoSan 601 Demealed crab shell ClandoSa 719 (1220) Demineralized crab shell ClandoSan R 901 75% ClandoSan? 601 and 25% ClandoSan 719 (1220) Other chitin-containing materials used in these studies included- shells obtained from shrimp, cray¬ fish, and horseshoe crabs. All such materials as well as otherwise untreated crab shells (crab "meal" or "crab scrap meal") were water-washed and then dried in a hot-air overnight at 100-110°C for approximately 16 hours. The dried ghell materials were then ground and milled to a particle size such that all of the material passed through a No. 25 U.S.A. Standard Sieve. The materials were, finally, dry blended at room temperature with soybean meal and urea sources in a twin shell (vee cone) blender for approximately 10 minutes to assure adequate homogenization of the mixtures with little or no segregation of particles. In addition to the above materials, agricultural grade diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate and spent chitin-containing fungal mycelia obtained from a commercial citric acid fermentation process were also studied to determine the±r effects as soil amendments. Mycelia were collected in a trammel (no lime used), vacuum filtered and then air dried at 60°C for approximately 20 hours. The dried mycelia, representing approximately 10% of the wet citric mycelium, were then milled, sieved and handled in the same manner as all other test materials. Representative data are illustrated in Tables 4 through 7. Tables 4 and 6 show the nematode suppres¬ sion effects of soybean-urea compositions supplement¬ ed with various supplements, including chitin (such as crab meal and Fungal Mycelium) and phosphates. Certain ClandoSan compositions are included. Tables 5 and 7 show plant growth effects of the Table 4 and 6 compositions, respectively. TABLE 4 NEMATICIDAL EFFECTS OF CLANDOSAN R COMPOSITIONS SANDY LOAM SOIL SET UP DAY 0 SUMMER CROOKNECK SQUASH SQUASH PLANTED DAY 15 MELOIDOGYNE ARENARIA (NEAL) HARVESTED DAY 53 CONC. SOIL AMENDMENT (G/KG) SOIL CONDITIONS GALLS PER GM. ROOT COMPOSITION CLANDOSAN 901 UREA SOYBEAN MEAL £H CONDUCT. RATE ROOT CONDITION Control 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 33 3.2 42.5 4.0 I I U.rea 0.0 0.5 0.0 5.4 32 2,3 18.8 4.1 , Soybean Meal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Urea + Soybean Meal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I - ClandoSan 901 1.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 52 .8 21.6 4.1 (74% 601) ClandoSan R 518 1.0 0.5 0.0 5.9 45 3.4 4,0 ClandoSan R 814 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 TABLE 4 (con't) NEMATICIDAL EFFECTS OF CLANDOSAN R COMPOSITIONS TABLE 5 FERTILIZER EFFECTS OF CLANDOSAN R COMPOSITIONS SANDY LOAM SOIL SET UP DAY 0 SUMMER CROOKNECK SQUASH SQUASH PLANTED DAY 15 MELOIDOGYNE ARENARIA (NEAL) HARVESTED DAY 53 CONC. SOIL AMENDMENT (G/KG) COMPOSITION CLANDOSAN R 901 UREA SOYBEAN MEAL Control 0.0 Urea 0.0 Soybean Meal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Urea + Soybean Meal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ClandoSan R 901 1.0 0.0 o.o 25.3 5.0 0.51 5.5 + 112 (75% 601) ClandoSan R 518 1.0 0.5 0.0 28.9 6. 3 0.59 6.9 + 165 ClandoSan R 814 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 TABLE 5 (con't) FERTILIZER EFFECTS OF CLANDOSAN R COMPOSITIONS SANDY LOAM SOIL SET UP DAY 0 SUMMER CROOKNECK SQUASH SQUASH PLANTED DAY 15 MELOIDOGYNE ARENARIA (NEAL) HARVESTED DAY 53 COMPOS mrη ClandoSan R 1029 TABLE 6 NEMATICIDAL EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTING SOYBEAN - UREA COMPOSITIONS SANDY LOAM SOIL SUMMER CROOKNECK SQUASH MELOIDOGYNE ARENARIA (NEAL) CONCENTRATION SOIL AMENDMENT G/KG) TABLE 6 (con't) NEMATICIDAL EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTING SOYBEAN - UREA COMPOSITIONS TABLE 7 PLANT GROWTH EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTING SOYBEAN - UREA COMPOSITIONS SANDY LOAM SOIL SUMMER CROOKNECK SQUASH MELOIDOGYNE ARENARIA (NEAL) CONCENTRATION SOIL AMENDMENT G/KG t TABLE 7 (con't) PLANT GROWTH EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTING SOYBEAN - UREA COMPOSITIONS 22 Example 3 Experiments similar to those described herein were carried out in aceordanee with the information set forth in the follθwing Ta lms 8, 9, 10 and 11 p employing ClandoSan 618 and Temik. The beneficial effects of ClandoSan 618 alone and in combination p with Temik are shown. TABLE 8 DOSE:RESPONSE EFFECTS OF CLANDOSAN 618 One Kilogram of 50:50 Sand:Soil Mixture Per Pot in Greenhouse Experiments; Elberta Soil (Kaiser); Five seeds "Davis" Soybean (Glycine max — pea legume family) Per Pot; Set Up Day 0 (March 1988), Soybeans Planted Day 9 and Harvested Day 44. Average of Eight Pots, Random Block Design. ClandoSan 618 Soil Top Height Top Weight Galls/Gram Root-knot Non-Parasitic Chitinase Per 100 cc. soil ** ug p-nitrophenol released/hour/gram of dry soil (Nematropica 123: 71-84, 1982; Plant and Soil 75: 95-106, 1983) TABLE 9 COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF CLANDOSAN R 618 AND ALDICARB (TEMIK R 15G) Seven Kgm SandsSoil Mixture in One Square Foot Mlcroplots; Elberta Soil (Kaiser); One Seedling "Black Beauty" Eggplant (Solanum melongena — nightshade family) Per Microplot; Set Up Day 0 (June, 1987), Eggplants Planted Day 19 and Final Harvest on Day 113 (11 Total Harvests); Average of Eight Microplots, Random Block Design, Auburn, Alabama. Total No. Total Yield Fresh Shoot Root-Knot Non-Parasitic Treatment Fruit (Lbs./Plot) Wgt. (Lbs.) Larvae* Nematodes** Soil pH Control 8.5 5.4 2.6 232 95 6.3 Control + Temik R (0.83 g/plot) 14.1 8.5 3.9 .270 71 6.3 ClandoSan (4 g/kgm soil) 15.6 8.8 3.6 176 105 6.3 t R R ClandoSan + Temik (as above) 19.0 11.6 4,9 162 83 6.4 * M,. incognita juveniles per 100 cc. soil ** Saprophagous nematodes per 100 cc. soil TABLE 10 COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF CLANDOSAN R 618 AND ALDICARB (TEMIK R 15G) Seven Kgm Sand:Soil Mixture in One Square Foot Microplots; Elberta Soil (Kaiser); Five Seeds "Pink Eye" Purple Hull Cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata — pea legume family) Per Microplot; Set Up Day 0 (June 1987). Peas Planted Day 12 and Final Harvest on Day 107 (6 Total Harvests); Average of Eight Microplots, Random Block Design, Auburn, Alabama. Treatment Control Control + Temik R (0.83 g/plot) ClandoSan R (4 g/kgm soil) ClandoSan R +. T m emi.k,R (as above) II l Per 100 cc . soil TABLE 11 COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF CLANDOSAN R 618 AND ALDICARB (TEMIK R 15G) Seven Kgm. Sand:Soil Mixture in One Square Foot Microplots; Elberta Soil (Gottler) ; One Seedling "Culbro 1" Tobacco (Nicotlana tabacum — nightshade family) Per Microplot; Set Up Day 0 (August 1987), Tobacco Planted Day 9 and Hairveste ' Day 60; Average of Eight Microplots, Random Block Design, Auburn, Alabama. Treatment Control t Control + Temik (0.83 g/plot) ClandoSan (4 g/kgm soil) R R jf ClandoSan + Temik (as above) ϊrt Per 100 cc soil 27 INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY As can be seen from the preceding disclosure, the present invention is industrially useful in providing on the one hand chitin-containing biologi¬ cal waste materials in a range of soil amendment products and on the other hand providing soybean meal urea based soil amendment compositions, all of which are characterized as- having nematistatic and nematicidal as well as plant nutritional properties which are useful in horticultural and agricultural applications. The preceding examples can be repeated with similar success by substituting the generically or specifically described reactants and/or operating conditions of this invention for those specifically used in the examples. From the foregoing descrip¬ tion, one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains can easily ascertain the essential charac¬ teristics thereof and, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, can make various changes and modifications to adapt it to various usages and conditions.

Claims: 28 CLAIMS 1. A soil amendment composition capable of stimulating the reproduction and development of normal soil microflora which produce ammonia and enzymes that are antagonistic to plant pathogenic nematodes of selected crop plants, which comprise in admixture: (a) vegetable, fruit or nut meals, and (b) a source of urea whereby the ratio by weight of (a);urea provided by (b) in said composition being about 2:1 to 8:1, the amounts ©£ (a) sa (b) iss said e©ap©git±©n being adapted t© rovide ©te©ut 1 t© 3 grams ©f said compo¬ sition per kilogram of soil in which said composition is admixed. 2. A composition according to Claim 1, wherein component (a) is soybean meal and the source of urea is urea. 3. A composition according to Claim 2, wherein the ratio of carbon atoms to nitrogen atoms is five (5) to one (1) or less. 4. A composition according to Claim 2 having a high Kjeldahl protein content. 5. A composition of matter comprising a plant growth medium in admixture with a nematicidally effective amount of the composition according to Cld*.2. 6. A composition according to Claim 2, further comprising a chitin-protein complex .or an ammonium phosphate in a concentration and amount effective to further suppress the growth of said plant-pathogenic nematodes and t© further reduee the phytθtoxicity of said composition to said selected crop plant. 7. A composition according to Claim 6, wherein the source of chitin-protein complex is dried crusta¬ cean shell wastes of seafood processing operations or 29 fungal mycelial residues remaining after industrial fermentations. 8. A method for suppressing the growth of plant-pathogenic nematodes in a plant growth medium capable of supporting said growth, which comprises admixing at least a nematistatically effective and non-phytotoxic amount of a composition according to Claim 1 with said plant growth medium to suppress the growth of said nematodes. 9. A method according to Claim 8, wherein the admixing is done at least one week prior to seeding or planting in said plant growth medium. 10. A method according to Claim 8, wherein the crop plant is a deciduous fruit or nut crop. 11. A method ' for suppressing the growth of plant-pathogenic nematodes in a plant growth medium capable of supporting said growth, which comprises applying the composition of Claim 1 to said medium at a rate of between 1.0 to 3.0 grams of composition per kilogram of medium.

Inventors: MILCH ROBERT AUSTIN, RODRIGUEZ-KABANA R, MILCH, ROBERT, AUSTIN, RODRIGUEZ-KABANA, R.
Applicants: IGENE BIOTECHNOLOGY INC, IGENE BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.
Application year: 1988
Main classification: C05G3
IPC codes: C05C9, C05F1, C05F11, C05G3, C09K17