Fuel-oxidant mixture for detonation gun flame-plating

Abstract: A fuel-oxidant mixture for detonation gun applic­ ations comprising an oxidant and a fuel mixture of two combustible gases selected from saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons and the use thereof. Articles coated in a process using such a fuel-oxidant mixture.

Description: The invention relates to a fuel-oxidant mixture for use with an apparatus for flame plating using detonation means and the coated layer produced therefrom. More particularly, the invention relates to a fuel-oxidant mixture containing at least two combustible gases, such as, for example, acetylene and propylene. Flame plating by means of detonation using a detonating gun (D-Gun) have been used in industry to produce coatings of various compositions for over a quarter of a century. Basically, the detonation gun comprises a fluid-cooled barrel having a small inner diameter of about 2.5 cm (about one inch). Generally a mixture of oxygen and acetylene is fed into the gun along with a comminuted coating material. The oxygen-acetylene fuel gas mixture is ignited to produce a detonation wave which travels down the barrel of the gun where it heats the coating material and propels the coating material out of the gun onto an article to be coated. US- A-2 714 563 discloses a method and apparatus which utilizes detonation waves for flame coating. The use of other gas mixtures such as hydrogen-air, propane-oxygen, and hydrogen oxygen is also therein disclosed. However these fuel gases are not mixed with acetylene. In general, when the fuel gas mixture in a detonation gun is ignited, detonation waves are produced that accelerate the comminuted coating material to about 731.5m/sec (about 2400 ft/sec) while heating it to a temperature about its melting point. After the coating material exits the barrel of the detonation gun a pulse of nitrogen purges the barrel. This cycle is generally repeated about four to eight times a second. Control of the detonation coating is obtained principally by varying the detonation mixture of oxygen to acetylene. In some application, such as, for example, producing tungsten carbide-cobalt-based coatings, it was found that improved coatings could be obtained by diluting the oxygen-acetylene fuel mixture with an inert gas such as, for example, nitrogen or argon. The gaseous diluent has been found to reduce or tend to reduce the flame temperature since it does not participate in the detonation reaction. US- A- 2 972 550 discloses the process of diluting the oxygen-acetylene fuel mixture to enable the detonation-plating process to be used with an increased number of coating compositions and also for new and more widely useful applications based on the coating obtainable. Generally, acetylene has been used as the combustible fuel gas because it produces both temperatures and pressures greater than those obtainable from any other saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbon gas. However, for some coating applications, the temperature of combustion of an oxygen-acetylene mixture of about 1:1 atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon yields combustion products much hotter than desired. As stated above, the general procedure for compensating for the high temperature of combustion of the oxygen-acetylene fuel gas is to dilute the fuel gas mixture with an inert gas such as, for example, nitrogen or argon. Although this dilution resulted in lowering the combustible temperature, it also results in a concomitant decrease in the peak pressure of the combustion reaction. This decrease in peak pressure results in a decrease in the velocity of the coating material propelled from the barrel onto a substrate. It has been found that with an increase of a diluting inert gas to the oxygen-acetylene fuel mixture, the peak pressure of the combustion reaction decreases faster than does the combustion temperature. It has now been found possible to provide a gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture for use in a detonation gun that can provide for lower fuel combustion temperatures than that obtainable from conventional oxygen-acetylene fuel gases while providing for relatively high peak pressures in the combustion reaction. It has also been found possible to provide a gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture for use in a detonation gun that can provide for the same fuel combustion temperatures as that obtainable from conventional oxygen-acetylene fuel gases diluted with an inert gas while not sacrificing peak pressure in the combustion reaction. It has further been found possible to provide coatings for substrates using the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture employed in the process of the present invention. According to the present invention there is provided a process of flame plating with a detonation gun which comprises igniting a gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture in an ignition chamber of detonation gun, the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture comprising (a) an oxidant and (b) a fuel mixture comprising a mixture of acetylene and a second combustible gas selected from propylene, methane, ethylene, methyl acetylene, propane, pentane, a butadiene, a butylene, a butane, ethylene oxide, ethane, cyclopropane, propadiene, cyclobutane and mixtures thereof, the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture having an atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon. In one embodiment of the present invention a process of flame plating with a detonation gun comprises the step of introducing desired fuel and oxidant gases into the detonation gun to form a detonatable mixture, introducing a comminuted coating material into the detonatable mixture within the gun, and detonating the fuel-oxidant mixture to impinge the coating material onto an article to be coated. The detonation gun could comprise a mixing chamber and a barrel portion so that the detonatable fuel-oxidant mixture could be introduced into the mixing and ignition chamber while a comminuted coating material is introduced into the barrel. The ignition of the fuel-oxidant mixture would then produce detonation waves which travel down the barrel of the gun where it heats the comminuted coating material and propels the coating material onto a substrate. The oxidant for use in the present invention could be selected from oxygen, nitrous oxide and mixtures thereof and the like. The combustible fuel mixture for use in this invention is acetylene (C 2 H 2 ) and a second combustible gas selected from propylene (C 3 H 6 ), methane (CH 4 ), ethylene (C 2 H 4 ), methyl acetylene (C 3 H 4 ), propane (C 3 H 8 ), ethane (C 2 H 6 ), butadienes (C 4 H 6 ), butylenes (C 4 H 8 ), butanes (C 4 H 10 ), cyclopropane (C 3 H 6 ), propadiene (C 3 H 4 ), cyclobutane (C 4 H 8 ), pentane, ethylene oxide (C 2 H 4 O) and mixtures thereof. As stated above, acetyene is considered to be the best combustible fuel for detonation gun operations since it produces both temperatures and pressures greater than those obtainable from any other saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbon. To reduce the temperature of the reaction products of the combustible gas, nitrogen or argon was generally added to dilute the oxidant-fuel mixture. This had the disadvantage of lowering the pressure of the detonation wave thus limiting the achievable particle velocity. Unexpectedly, it was discovered that when a second combustible gas, such as, for example, propylene, is mixed with acetylene, the reaction of the combustible gases with an appropriate oxidant yields a peak pressure at any temperature that is higher than the pressure of an equivalent temperature nitrogen diluted acetylene-oxygen mixture. If, at a given temperature, an acetylene-oxygen-nitrogen mixture is replaced by an acetylene-second combustible gas-oxygen mixture, the gaseous mixture containing the second combustible gas will always yield higher peak pressure than the acetylene-oxygen-nitrogen mixture. The theoretical values of RP% and RT% are defined as follows: RP% = 100 (P D /P o ) RT% = 100 ΔT D /ΔT o P o and ΔT o are respectively the pressure and temperature rise following the detonation of a 1:1 mixture of oxygen and acetylene from the following equation: C 2 H 2 + O 2 → 2 CO + H 2 . P D and ΔT D are, respectively, the pressure rise and temperature rise following the detonation of either an oxygen-acetylene mixture diluted with nitrogen or an acetylene-second hydrocarbon gas-oxygen mixture where the ratio of carbon to oxygen is 1:1. Different temperatures are achieved by using different values for either X or Y in the following equation: C 2 H 2 + O 2 + X N 2 = 2 CO + H 2 + X N 2 [1-Y] C 2 H 2 + y C A H B + [1-y + Ay/2]O 2 → [2-2Y + AY] CO + [1-y + BY/2] H 2 The values of RP% versus RT% for the detonation of either an oxygen-acetylene mixture diluted with nitrogen or an acetylene-second hydrocarbon-oxygen mixture are shown in Figure 1. As evident from Figure 1, as one adds N 2 , as in Equation 2a, to lower the value of ΔT D and hence RT%, the peak pressure P D and hence RP%, is also decreased. For example, if sufficient nitrogen is added to reduce ΔT D to 60% of ΔT D , the peak pressure P D drops to 50% of P o . If, however, an acetylene-second hydrocarbon-oxygen mixture is used for any value of ΔT D or RT%, the value of P D and hence RP% will be larger than if a nitrogen diluted acetylene-oxygen mixture is used. For example, as shown in Figure 1, if an acetylene propylen-oxygen mixture is used to obtain a value of RT% equal to 60%, the ratio of RP% is 80%, a value 1.6 times greater than if an acetylene-oxygen-nitrogen mixture is employed to achieve a value of RT% equal to the same value. It is believed that higher pressures increase particle velocity, which results in improved coating properties. The gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture of this invention has an atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon of from 0.9 to 2.0, preferably from about 0.95 to about 1.6 and most preferably from about 0.98 to 1.4. An atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon below 0.9 would generally be unsuitable because of the formation of free carbon and soot while a ratio above 2.0 would generally be unsuitable for carbide and metallic coatings because the flame becomes excessively oxidizing. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture would comprise from 50 to 65 percent by volume oxygen, from 12 to 26 percent by volume acetylene and 18 to 30 percent by volume of a second combustible gaseous fuel such as, for example, propylene. In some applications, it may be desirable to add an inert diluent gas to the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture. Suitable inert diluting gases would be argon, neon, krypton, xenon, helium and nitrogen. Generally, all prior art coating materials that could be employed with the fuel-oxidant mixture of the prior art in detonation gun applications can be used with the novel gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture of this invention. In addition, the prior art coating compositions, when applied at lower temperatures and higher pressures than that of the prior art, produce coatings on substrates that have conventional compositions but novel and unobvious physical characteristics such as hardness. Examples of suitable coating compositions for use with the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture of this invention would include tungsten carbide-cobalt, tungsten carbide-nickel, tungsten carbide-cobalt chromium, tungsten carbide-nickel chromium, chromium-nickel, aluminum oxide, chromium carbide-nickel chromium, chromium carbide-cobalt chromium, tungsten-titanium carbide-nickel, cobalt alloys, oxide dispersion in cobalt alloys, alumina-titania, copper based alloys, chromium based alloys, chromium oxide, chromium oxide plus aluminum oxide, titanium oxide, titanium plus aluminum oxide, iron based-alloys, oxide dispersed in iron based-alloys, nickel, nickel based alloys, and the like. These unique coating materials are ideally suited for coating substrates made of materials such as titanium, steel aluminum nickel, cobalt, alloys thereof and the like. The powders for use in the D-Gun for applying a coating according to the present invention are preferably powders made by the cast and crushed process. In this process the constituents of the powder are melted and cast into a shell shaped ingot. Subsequently, this ingot is crushed to obtain a powder which is then screened to obtain the desired particle size distribution. However, other forms of powder, such as sintered powders made by a sintering process, and mixes of powders can also be used. In the sintering process, the constituents of the powder are sintered together into a sintered cake and then this cake is crushed to obtain a powder which is then screened to obtain the desired particle size distribution. Some examples are provided below to illustrate certain aspects of the present invention. In these examples, coatings were made using the following powder compositions shown in Table 1. Coating Material Powders Sample Powder Composition -wt % Powder Size Co C Fe Other W % through Mesh Max. % of Min. size A Cast & Crushed 9.0 to 10.0 4.3 to 4.8 1.5 max .21 max Bal. 95% through 325 10% less than 5 microns B Sintered 11 to 13 5.15 min 0.5 max 0.5 max Bal. 98% through 325 15% less than 15 microns C Mix of Cast & Crushed & Sintered 10.5 to 12.5 4.5 to 4.8 1.25 max 1.0 max Bal. 98% through 325 15% less than 5 microns D Cast & Crushed 10 to 12 3.9% to 4.3 2.0 max 0.2 max Bal. 98% through 325 10% less than 5 microns EXAMPLE 1 The gaseous fuel-oxidant mixtures of the compositions shown in Table 2 were each introduced to a detonation gun to form a detonatable mixture having an oxygen to carbon atomic ratio as shown in Table 2. Sample coating powder A was also fed into the detonation gun. The flow rate of each gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture was 0.38 m 3 /min (13.5 cubic feet per minute-cfm) except for the samples 28, 29 and 30 which were 0.31 m 3 /min (11.0 cfm), and the feed rate of each coating powder was 53.3 grams per minute (gpm) except for sample 29 which was 46.7 gpm and sample 30 which was 40.0 gpm. The gaseous fuel-mixture in volume percent and the atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon for each coating example are shown in Table 2. The coating sample powder was fed into the detonation gun at the same time as the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture. The detonation gun was fired at a rate of about 8 times per second and the coating powder in the detonation gun was impinged onto a steel substrate to form a dense, adherent coating of shaped microscopic leaves interlocking and overlapping with each other. The percent by weight of the cobalt and carbon in the coated layer were determined along with the hardness for the coating. The hardness of most of the coating examples in Table 2 were measured as the Rockwell superficial hardness and converted into Vickers hardness. The Rockwell superficial hardness method employed is per ASTM standard method E-18. The hardness is measured on a smooth and flat surface of the coating itself deposited on a hardened steel substrate. The Rockewell hardness numbers were converted into Vickers hardness numbers by the following formula: HV.3 = -1774 + 37.433 HR45N where HV.3 is the Vickers hadness obtained with 0.3 kgf load and HR45N is the Rockewell superficial hardness obtained on the N scale with a diamond penetrator and a 45 kgf load. The hardness of the coatings of line 28, 29 and 30 was measured directly as Vickers hardness. The Vickers hardness method employed is measured essentially per ASTM standard method E-384, with the exception that only one diagonal of the square indentation was measured rather than measuring and averaging the lengths of both diagonals. A load of 0.3 kgf was used (HV.3). These data are shown in Table 2. The values shows that the hardness was superior for coatings obtained using propylene in place of nitrogen in the gaseous fuel-mixture. Erosion is a form of wear by which material is removed from a surface by the action of impinging particles. The particles are generally solid and carried in either a gaseous or a fluid stream, although he particles may also be fluid carried in a gaseous stream. There are a number of factors which influence the wear by erosion. Particle size and mass, and their velocity are obviously important because they determine the kinetic energy of the impinging particles. The type of particles, their hardness, angularity and shape, and their concentration may also affect the rate of erosion. Furthermore, the angle of particle impingement will also affect the rate of erosion. For test purposes, alumina and silica powders are widely used. The test procedure similar to the method described in ASTMG 76-83 are used to measure the erosion wear rate of the coatings presented in the examples. Essentially, about 1.2 gm per minute of alumina abrasive is carried in a gas stream to a nozzle which is mounted on a pivot so that it can be set for various particle impingement angles while a constant standoff is maintained. It is standard practice to test the coatings at both 90° and 30° impingement angles. During the test, the impinging particles create a crater on the test sample. The measured scar depth of the crater is divided by the amount of abrasive which impinged on the sample. The results, in micrometers (microns) of wear per gram of abrasive, is taken as the erosion wear rate (µ/gm). These data are also shown in Table 2. The hardness and erosion wear data show that using an acetylene-hydrocarbon gas-oxygen mixture in place of a nitrogen diluted acetylene-oxygen mixture can produce a coating having a higher hardness at the same cobalt content (compare sample coating 9 with sample coatings 22 and 23) or higher cobalt content at the same hardness (compare sample coating 1 with sample coating 22). D-GUN PARAMETERS AND PROPERTIES OF COATINGS MADE FROM POWDER A Gaseous Fuel-Mixture (Vol %) O 2 to C Atomic Ratio Hardness (1) Vickers (Kg/mm 2 ) Chemistry Erosion (µ/gm) Sample Coating C 3 H 6 C 2 H 2 O 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 1 37.0 3.7 59.3 1.0 1130 19.1 3.5 116 22 2 29.8 12.8 57.4 1.0 1185 17.0 3.1 103 20 3 29.8 10.0 60.2 1.1 1185 15.6 2.3 85 20 4 29.8 7.5 62.7 1.2 1160 14.3 1.8 94 21 5 29.8 5.3 64.9 1.3 1145 13.3 1.6 92 22 6 29.8 3.2 67.0 1.4 1135 12.8 1.3 90 22 7 25.6 18.0 56.4 1.0 1225 16.7 3.5 94 19 8 25.6 16.6 57.8 1.05 1210 14.1 2.8 90 20 9 25.6 15.3 59.1 1.1 1225 13.6 2.1 82 19 10 25.6 12.9 61.5 1.2 1190 12.8 1.6 78 21 11 25.6 10.6 63.8 1.3 1185 11.4 1.4 75 20 12 25.6 8.6 65.8 1.4 1160 11.0 1.2 79 23 13 25.6 6.7 67.7 1.5 1145 10.6 1.0 81 24 14 25.6 5.7 68.7 1.6 1120 10.7 1.0 84 25 15 25.6 3.4 71.0 1.7 1110 10.3 0.9 94 26 16 18.6 26.7 54.7 1.0 1220 14.2 3.6 104 23 17 18.6 24.1 57.3 1.1 1240 11.3 2.2 87 24 18 18.6 21.8 59.6 1.2 1180 10.1 1.6 81 21 19 18.6 17.6 63.8 1.4 1195 8.0 0.9 74 20 20 18.6 14.1 67.3 1.6 1110 7.8 0.6 95 26 21 18.6 11.1 70.3 1.8 1095 7.9 0.6 122 28 N 2 C 2 H 2 O 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 22 45 27.8 27.2 0.98 1140 13.6 3.6 94 20 23 45 27.5 27.5 1.0 1030 13.6 3.5 90 18 24 45 25.0 30.0 1.2 1009 11.4 2.1 77 16 25 45 22.9 32.1 1.4 991 11.2 1.6 81 22 26 45 21.2 33.8 1.6 883 10.9 1.2 94 23 27 45 19.6 35.4 1.8 930 10.6 1.1 110 25 28 40 30.3 29.7 0.98 1080* 13.2 3.5 106 20 29 30 35.3 34.7 0.98 1150* 10.7 3.6 109 18 30 10 42.8 42.2 0.98 1300* 3.7 119 20 Note (1) measured as Rockwell superficial hardness and converted to Vickers hardness unless otherwise indicated by an asterisk (*). EXAMPLE 2 The gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture of the compositions shown in Table 3 were each introduced into a detonation gun at a flow rate of 0.38 m 3 /min (13.5 cubic feet per minute) to form a detonatable mixture having an atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon as also shown in Table 3. The coating powder was Sample A and the fuel-oxidant mixture and powder feed rate are as also shown in Table 3. As in Example 1, the Vickers hardness and erosion rate (µ/gm) data were determined and these data are shown in Table 3. As evidenced from the data, various hydrocarbon gases can be used in conjunction with acetylene to provide a gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture in accordance with this invention ot coat substrates. The Vickers hardness data show that using an acetylene-hydrocarbon gas-oxygen mixture in place of an acetylene-oxygen-nitrogen mixture can produce either a coating having a higher hardness at the same cobalt content (compare sample coatings 5 and 10 with sample coating 23 in Table 2) or a coating having a higher cobalt content for the same hardness (compare sample coatings 6, 8 and 11 with sample coating 22 in Table 2). D-GUM PARAMETERS AND PROPERTIES OF COATINGS MADE FROM POWDER A Gaseous Fuel-Mixture (Vol %) O 2 to C Atomic Ratio Powder Feed Rate (gpm) Hardness Vickers (Kg/mm 2 ) Chemistry Erosion (µ/gm) Sample Coating CH 4 C 2 H 2 O 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 1 12.9 40.3 46.8 1.0 53 1272 9.3 3.6 93 20 2 21.2 34.1 44.7 1.0 53 1231 12.6 3.4 96 21 3 27.8 29.2 43.0 1.0 53 1180 15.1 3.2 102 21 C 2 H 4 C 2 H 2 O 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 4 17.1 32.9 50.0 1.0 53 1270 9.6 3.7 96 20 5 29.2 20.8 50.0 1.0 53 1186 13.6 3.7 97 21 6 39.2 10.8 50.0 1.0 53 1160 16.5 3.8 103 20 7 39.2 10.8 50.0 1.0 40 1192 17.3 3.6 103 20 C 3 H 6 C 2 H 2 O 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 8 17.1 19.6 45.0 1.0 53 1120 16.2 3.5 97 21 Sample Coating C 3 H 8 C 2 H 2 O 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 9 7.0 41.2 51.8 1 53 1240 9.5 3.8 112 21 10 12.3 34.6 53.1 1 53 1196 13.3 3.8 99 21 11 16.8 29.0 54.2 1 53 1140 16.6 3.7 106 20 12 16.8 29.0 54.2 1 40 1161 16.9 3.6 102 19 C 4 H 10 C 2 H 2 O 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 13 5.7 41.5 52.9 1 53 1263 9.5 3.8 106 19 EXAMPLE 3 The gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture of the compositions shown in Table 4 were each introduced into a detonation gun to form a detonatable mixture having an atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon as also shown in Table 4. The coating powder was sample B and the fuel-oxidant mixture is as also shown in Table 4. The gas flow rate was 0.38 m 3 /min (13.5 cubic feet per minute-cfm) with the feed rate being as shown in Table 4. As in Example 1, the hardness and erosion rate (µ/gm) were determined and these data are shown in Table 4. While sintered powders do not show a great change in cobalt content with gun temperature, higher hardness coatings with equivalent cobalt contents can be obtained with acetylene-hydrocarbon gas-oxygen mixtures than with acetylene-oxygen-nitrogen mixtures (compare sample coating 4 with sample coating 1). D-GUN PARAMETERS AND PROPERTIES OF COATINGS MADE FROM POWDER B Gaseous Fuel-Mixture (Vol %) O 2 to C Atomic Ratio Powder Feed Rate (gpm) Hardness Vickers (Kg/mm 2 ) Chemistry Erosion (µ/gm) Sample Coating H 2 C 2 H 2 O 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 1 45 27.8 27.2 0.98 17 940 12.9 5.2 2 45 27.8 27.2 0.98 25 920 13.1 5.1 76 9.5 C 3 H 6 C 2 H 2 O 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 3 18.6 27.3 54.1 0.98 17 1070 13.3 5.1 82 12 4 18.6 27.3 54.1 0.98 25 1160 12.9 5.2 72 11 5 25.6 18.6 55.8 0.98 25 1045 13.5 5.2 68 9 6 29.8 12.8 57.4 1.0 25 890 12.7 4.5 71 8 7 37 3.7 59.3 1.0 25 935 13.6 5.2 86 9 EXAMPLE 4 The gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture of the compositions shown in Table 5 were each introduced into a detonation gun to form a detonatable mixture having an atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon as also shown in Table 5. The coating powder was sample C and the fuel-oxidant mixture is as also shown in Table 5. The gas flow rate was 0.38 m 3 /min (13.5 cubic feet per minute-cfm) with the feed rate being as shown in Table 5. As in Example 1, the Vickers hardness and erosion rate (µ/gm) were determined and these data are shown in Table 5. The Vickers hardness data show that using an acetylene-hydrocarbon gas-oxygen mixture in place of an acetylene-oxygen-nitrogen mixture can produce a coating having a higher hardness at the same cobalt content (compare sample coating 2 with sample coating 1). D-GUN PARAMETERS AND PROPERTIES OF COATINGS MADE FROM POWDER C Gaseous Fuel-Mixture (Vol %) O 2 to C Atomic Ratio Powder Feed Rate (gpm) Hardness Vickers (Kg/mm 2 ) Chemistry Erosion (µ/gm) Sample Coating N 2 C 2 H 2 O 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 1 45 27.5 27.5 1.0 36.7 980 13.4 4.1 79 15 C 3 H 6 C 2 H 2 O 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 2 18.6 26.8 54.7 1.0 36.7 1168 13.2 4.1 87 15 3 29.8 12.8 57.5 1.0 36.7 1149 15.0 4.0 76 13 4 29.8 12.8 57.5 1.0 53.3 1194 14.7 4.0 74 12 5 29.8 10.0 60.2 1.1 36.7 1129 14.0 2.9 74 14 EXAMPLE 5 The gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture of the compositions shown in Table 6 were each introduced into a detonation gun to form a detonatable mixture having an atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon as also shown in Table 6. The coating powder was sample D and the fuel-oxidant mixture is as also shown in Table 6. The gas flow rate was 0.38 m 3 /min (13.5 cubic feet per minute-cfm) except for sample coatings 17, 18 and 19 which were 11.0 cfm, and the feed rate was 46.7 grams per minute (gpm). As in Example 1, the Vickers hardness and erosion rate (µ/gm) were determined and these data are shown in Table 6. The Vickers hardness data show that using an acetylene-hydrocarbon gas-oxygen mixture in place of an acetylene-oxygen-nitrogen mixture can produce either a coating having a higher hardness at the same cobalt content (compare sample coating 5 with sample coating 17) or a coating having a higher cobalt content for the same hardness (compare sample coating 5 with sample coating 18). D-GUN PARAMETERS AND PROPERTIES OF COATINGS MADE FROM POWDER D Gaseous Fuel-Mixture Atomic Ratio (Vol %) O 2 to C Vickers Hardness (1) (Kg/mm 2 ) Chemistry Erosion (µ/gm) Sample Coating C 3 H 6 C 2 H 2 O 2 N 2 % Co % C 90° 30° 1 37.0 3.7 59.3 - 1.0 17.6 3.2 2 29.8 12.8 57.4 - 1.0 1235 15.2 2.4 109 24 3 29.8 7.5 62.7 - 1.2 1200 13.2 0.9 86 25 4 29.8 3.2 67.0 - 1.4 1180 11.6 0.6 77 24 5 25.6 18.0 56.4 - 1.0 1250 15.5 3.2 100 25 6 25.6 16.6 57.8 - 1.05 1230 14.3 2.1 88 24 7 25.6 15.3 59.1 - 1.1 1185 13.7 1.6 81 24 8 25.6 12.9 61.5 - 1.2 1110 12.6 1.0 75 24 9 25.6 10.6 63.8 - 1.3 1215 14.4 1.3 81 24 10 25.6 8.6 65.8 - 1.4 1020 10.5 0.7 71 23 11 25.6 6.7 67.7 - 1.5 1095 9.9 0.5 75 25 12 25.6 5.7 68.7 - 1.6 1180 9.8 0.5 84 25 13 25.6 3.4 71.0 - 1.7 1115 9.5 0.5 93 25 14 18.6 24.1 57.3 - 1.1 1260 10.0 1.3 69 22 15 18.6 21.8 59.6 - 1.2 1215 9.3 0.9 65 22 16 18.6 17.6 63.8 - 1.4 920 7.0 0.5 101 25 17 - 30.3 29.7 40 0.98 1100* 15.6 3.4 120 30 18 - 35.3 34.7 30 0.98 1250* 12.2 3.5 120 26 19 - 42.8 42.2 10 0.98 1375* 6.9 3.6 120 23 Note (1) Measured as Rockwell superficial hardness and converted to Vickers hardness unless otherwise indicated with an asterisk (*).

Claims: A process of flame plating with a detonation gun which comprises igniting a gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture in an ignition chamber of the detonation gun, the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture comprising (a) an oxidant and (b) a fuel mixture comprising a mixture of acetylene and a second combustible gas selected from propylene, methane, ethylene, methyl acetylene, propane, pentane, a butadiene, a butylene, a butane, ethylene oxide, ethane, cyclopropane, propadiene, cyclobutane and mixtures thereof, the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture having an atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon of 0.9 to 2.0 and the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture containing from 45 to 70 percent by volume oxidant, from 7 to 45 percent by volume acetylene and from 10 to 45 percent by volume of the second combustible gas. A process according to claim 1, wherein the oxidant is selected from oxygen, nitrous oxide and mixtures thereof. A process according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the mixture contains from 50 to 65 percent by volume oxidant, from 12 to 26 percent by volume acetylene and from 18 to 30 percent by volume of the second combustible gas. A process according any of claim 1 to 3, wherein the second combustible gas is selected from propylene, propane and butylene and the atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon is from 0.95 to 1.6. A process according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the second combustible gas consists substantially of propylene. A process according to any of claims 1 to 5, wherein the mixture contains an inert diluting gas. A process according to claim 6, wherein the inert diluting gas is selected from argon, neon, krypton, xenon, helium and nitrogen. A process according to claim 7, wherein the inert diluting gas is nitrogen. A process according to any of claims 1 to 8, wherein the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture is introduced into the gun to form a detonatable mixture, a powdered coating material is introduced into the detonatable mixture within the gun, and the fuel-oxidant mixture is detonated to impinge the coating material onto an article to be coated. A process according to claim 9, wherein the detonation gun has a mixing and ignition chamber and a barrel portion, wherein the gaseous fuel-oxidant mixture is introduced into the gun through the mixing and ignition chamber, a comminuted coating material is introduced into the barrel portion, and the gaseous fuel-oxident mixture is detonated within the gun to impinge the coating material onto an article to be coated.

Inventors: JACKSON JOHN ERIC, JACKSON, JOHN ERIC
Applicants: PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY INC, PRAXAIR S.T. TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Application year: 1988
Main classification: C23C4
IPC codes: C10L3, C23C4, B05B7, C23C24, B23K20