A METHOD TO DETECT RADIATION AND MEASURE ITS ANGLE OF INCIDENCE AND A DETECTOR ARRANGEMENT TO CARRY OUT THE METHOD

Abstract: The present invention relates to a method to measure the angle of incidence for radiation and a detector to carry out the method. The background for the invention is that in certain electromagnetic radiation, for example laser light of different wavelengths from UV to IR, there occurs an irregularity, speckledness, that is amoung other things caused by turbulence in the atmosphere. This phenomenon gives rise to problems during the registration of a single or a few short pulses of radiation. The probability of detection can decrease considerably at the same time as difficulties to reliably determine the angle to the source of radiation with high resolution can arise. This problem is solved by the invention by placing at least two detectors (a, b, c, d) so far apart that they receive an irradiance that is essentially un-correlated in the case of speckled radiation and that the detectors are made of two detector elements (1, 2) that are mounted so close to each other that both detector elements receive essentially the same irradiance and in such a direction that the normals of respective detector element form a known angle ( beta ) with each other. One then calculates the angle of incidence ( alpha ) by means of the signals (S1, S2) from the detector elements (1, 2) that depend on the shape of the sensitivity beams, and said angle ( beta ) between the detector elements.

Description: A method to detect radiation and measure its angle of incidence and a detector arrangement to carry out the method The present invention relates to a method to detect radiation and measure its angle of incidence and a detector arrangement to carry out the method. The background for the invention is that in certain electromagnetic radiation, for example laser light of different wavelengths from UV to IR, there occurs an irregularity, speckledness, that is among other things caused by turbulence in the atmosphere. The speckledness varies with a frequency of up to 100 Hz. Experiments that have been carried out have shown that this phenomenon, that means a great variation in the irradiance of the radiation that falls onto a detector, gives rise to problems during the registration of a single or a few short pulses of radiation. On one hand the probability of detection can decrease considerably and on the other hand difficulties to reliably determine the angle to the source of radiation with high resolution can arise. These problems are, however, solved by the invention by giving it the design that is evident from the following claims. In the following the invention will be described in more detail with refe¬ rence to the accompanying drawing where fig 1 shows a detector arrangement according to the invention and fig 2 a detector sensitive to the angle of incidence according to the invention. The basis for the idea of the invention is that one increases the prob¬ ability of detection by trying to detect the incident speckled radiation in a number of points at such a great distance from each other that the correlation between the irradiance received by the different detectors is small, at the same time as one determines the direction of the radiation in relation to a reference direction by means of specially designed detectors that consists of two detector elements 1,2. The detec¬ tor elements have their detector planes in a certain angle to each other and are placed so close to each other that the correlation between the irradiance of the radiation towards them is high. Popularly speaking both detector elements measure towards the same speckle in the speckled radiation. The correlation between the irradiance detected by the detector elements 1,2 depends on the mounting distance between the two detector elements. The wavelength, the illumination distance and the atmospheric condition also play a part here. As an example the irradiances are completely un- correlated if the detector elements 1,2 are mounted at a d stance of more than about 5 cm, if the wavelength s 1 μ and the illumination distance is 2000 m. (This is calculated from y Λ* L, λ = the wavelength and L = the illumination distance). When the distance is about 4 πtm the correla¬ tion between the signals from the detector elements are about 0.9, which is a minimum value if one is to get useful results by the invention. The example is valid for a moderately turbulent atmosphere. Already by using two detectors placed at such a distance that the irra¬ diance towards them is essentially un-correlated, a much smaller risk is obtained for both detectors to get into a dark spot in the incident radiation and not detect it. The probability of detection increases with more detectors receiving un-correlated radiation. Depending on the application the detectors can be placed along a line or over an area. The mutual distance should then be about Λ L with a . limitation of L to 2000 m. In a possible application on a mast of a ship it can be suitable to place the detectors above each other, more or less in a line. In certain other cases it is conceivable, however, that another thing, for example another mast blocks all detectors in a certain direc¬ tion, so that an installation over an area is preferred. A possible, simple arrangement with good effect is shown in figure 1 and comprises four detectors a, b, c and d placed in the corners of a square. In the case with the radiation of the wavelength 1 urn the side of the square can according to the above be about 5 cm for the signals to be un-correlated. As stated above the two detector elements 1,2 of each detector shall measure correlated signals. From the point of view of correlation it is better the closer the elements are placed. As one tries to get a small average distance between the two detector elements 1,2 it can be suitable to use rectangular or in another way oblong detector elements that are placed with the long sides against each other. Experiments have been carried out at 1 ~ ~ with detector elements having the measures 0.6 x 2.5 mm, which for reasons of manufacturing technique were placed with the long sides about 1.4 mm apart. The detector elements can be of a completely conventional type, chosen according to the wave length and pulse length of the radiation to be de¬ tected. The signal caused by the radiation from each detector element depends on the angle of incidence of the radiation. Each detector have a sensitivity beam, within which the sensitivity for incident radiation varies in a way specific for each detector type. With knowledge of the shape of the sensitivity beams for the detector elements used, the direc¬ tion of the incident radiation can be referred to a desired reference direction by an angle OS by means of a suitable signal processing. If, for example, one uses a conventional detector of the type that has a sensitiv¬ ity beam having essentially a cosinusoidal dependence of the angle of incidence, the signal S,,$ 2 from each detector element arising from the radiation will depend upon the angle of incidence for the radiation according to the cosine law. The cosine law gives: S-= E cos c S 2 = E cos ( ?,-< • <. where S,= The signal from detector element 1, S = The signal from detector element 2, E = the power density (W/m 2) of the incident radiation o = the angle sought for = the angle with the normal of the detector plane 1, fs - the known angle between the detector planes. If one solves with respect to o one gets Thus it i s easy to cal cul ate the angl e of nc dence or t e rad at on in rel ation to a given reference direction .

Claims: Cl aims : 1. A method to detect radiation, also speckled radiation, and to measure, its angle of incidence [CX ) in relation to a reference direction characterized in that at least two detectors (a,b,c,d) are placed, so far apart that they receive an irradiance that is essentially un-correlated"in the case of speckled radiation and that the detectors (a,b,c,d) are made of two detector elements (1,2) that are mounted so close to each other that both detector elements receive essentially the same irradiance and in such a direction that the normals of respective detector element form a. known angle { fi ) with each other and that one calculates the angle of incidence ( ot ) by means of the signals (S, ,S 2 ) from the detector elements (1,2), that depend on the shape of the sensitivity beams, and said angle ( ) between the detector elements. 2. A method according to claim 1 characterized in that one uses four detectors (a,b,c,d) that are placed in a square. 3. A method according to claim 1 or 2 characterized in that the detector • elements (1,2) are mounted so close to each other that the correlation between their respective measured irradiance is greater that 0.9. 4. A method according to one of the previous claims characterized in that the detector elements (1,2) are chosen rectangular and mounted with their long sides against each other to give a small average distance between them. 5. A detector arrangement to carry out the method to detect radiation, also speckled radiation and measure its angle of incidence (ex. ) in relation to a reference direction characterized in that it consists of αt- least two detectors (a,b,c,d) that are placed so far apart that they receive an irradiance that is essentially un-correlated in the case of speckled radiation and that the detectors (a,b,c,d) consists of two detector elements (1,2) that are mounted so close to each other that both detector elements receive essentially the same irradiance and that they are orientated in such a way that the normals of respective detector element form a known angle ( ) with each other, so that the angle of incidence (oc ) can be calculated by means of the signals (S. ,S 2 ) from the detector elements (1,2), that depend on the shape of the sensitivity beams, and said angle ( 3 ) between the detector elements. 6. A detector arrangement according to claim 5 characterized in that four detectors (a,b,c,d) are placed in a square. 7. A detector arrangement according to claim 5 or 6 characterized in that the detector elements (1,2) are mounted so close to each other that the correlation between their respective measured irradiance is greater that 0.9. 8. A detector arrangement according to one of the previous claims characterized in that the detector elements (1,2) are rectangular and mounted with their long sides against each other to give a small average distance between them.

Inventors: NISSBORG KURT, NISSBORG, KURT
Applicants: FOERSVARETS FORSKNINGSANSTALT
Application year: 1988
Main classification: G01S3
IPC codes: G01J1, G01N21, G01S3, G01T1