A REMOTE MAINTENANCE SYSTEM FOR A DIGITAL COMMUNICATION NETWORK

Abstract: A remote maintenance system for a digital communication network, comprises local offices (LOs) (1-1, 1-2) at least two of which are grouped and connected to each other by a local line (441) in the group and a centralized maintenance and operation center (CMOC) (3) located at a tandem office and connected to each LO (1-1, 1-2) by an ordinary digital transmission line (DTL) (511, 512) using No. 7 Common Channel Signaling (CCS) system recommended by CCITT. When a serious fault, such as system-down, occurs in an LO (first LO) (1-1) in the group, a serious alarm signal is sent from the first LO (1-1) to the CMOC (3) through the local line (511), another LO (second LO) (1-2) in the group and the DTL (512) connecting between the second LO (1-2) and the CMOC (3), so that maintenance data for repairing the serious fault are provided at the CMOC (3) and sent, under the No. 7 CCS system, to the first LO (1-1) through the DTL (551) toward the first LO (1-1) by providing means for sending the maintenance data without using switching network in the first LO (1-1) or through the DTL (512) toward the second LO (1-2), the second LO (1-2) and the local line (441).

Description: The present invention relates to a remote maintenance system for a digital communication network consisting of a plurality of digital switching offices. A digital communication network comprises a plurality of local switching offices (LOs) and a toll center (TC), and recently, the maintenance of equipments at each LO is remotely executed at a centralized maintenance and operation center (CMOC) located at the TC. The maintenance system of thus using the CMOC will be called a remote maintenance system hereinafter. The CMOC has two functions: a maintenance function and an operation function. The operation function is for the administration of the network such as setting or changing subscribers, so that only the maintenance function at the CMOC will be discussed in this disclosure. A first remote maintenance system of the prior art will be discussed referring to Figs. 1 and 2. In Figs. 1 and 2, the supervisory information at each LO 1 is sent to the CMOC 3 through an exclusive data line (DL) 41 provided independently from a digital transmission line (DTL) 51 for ordinary communication in the digital communication network. As shown in Fig. 2, in the prior art, the operating status data and alarm data at the LO are gathered at an alarm unit (ALM) 10. Then, these data are sent to an data sending unit (SND) 16 through a bus line 100 in the LO, and are sent to the CMOC 3 through the DL 41. The data for the operating status and alarm sent from the LO 1 are received at a data receiving unit (RCV) 36 in the CMOC 3. Then, in the CMOC 3, the data received at the RCV 36 are processed by a main processor (MPR) 31, displayed on a visual display unit (VDU) 351 of a system control work station (SCWS) 35, and stored in a memory means such as a magnetic tape (MT) 34. When a fault occurs in the LO 1, the existence of the fault is indicated by an alarm indicator or buzzer, which is not depicted in Fig. 2, to an operator at the CMOC 3. Then, the operator at the CMOC 3 investigates the fault by observing a visual display unit (VDU) 351 of the SCWS 35, and inform how to repair the fault to an operator stationed at the LO 1 by, for exemple, telephone, using the digital communication network. When the operator at the LO 1 receives the maintenance information for repairing the fault from the operator at the CMOC 3, the operator at the LO 1 repairs the fault at the LO 1 in accordance with the maintenance information from the operator at the CMOC 3. The operator at the LO 1 executes the maintenance to the fault in accordance with the maintenance information by observing a VDU 151 and operating an operating console 152 of the SCWS 35 at the LO 1. Thus, in the first remote maintenance system of the prior art, the data of the operating status and alarm at the LOs 1 are remotely supervised at the CMOC 3. However, the operator at the CMOC 3 must call the operator at the LO 1 to inform how to repair the fault, the operator must be always stood by at each LO 1 for executing the maintenance, and the MT 14 also must be provided at the LO 1 for, e.g. initial programming to the serious fault such as a system-down in the LO 1. The system-down is a system trouble that the switching operation ceases due to a hard trouble of the switching network or a soft trouble in the main processor. Thus hard trouble mostly occurs because of a trouble of the software for the main processor. Previously considering the occurrence of such system-down, the MT 14 is provided for storing an initial loading program used for normally restarting the switching network and/or the main processor. Reference symbols DTs 13 and 33 in Fig. 2 indicate digital terminals of the DL 51 provided between the LO 1 and the CMOC 3. To improve the above problem of the first remote maintenance system of the prior art, a second remote maintenance system has been proposed in the prior art as shown in Figs. 3 and 4. In Figs. 3 and 4, the same numerals and symbols as in Figs. 1 and 2 designate the same units or functions as in Figs. 1 and 2. In the second remote maintenance system of the prior art, the maintenance data from the CMOC 3 are sent to respective LO 1 also through the exclusive data line. In Fig. 3, a one dot chain line having reference numeral 42 indicates that the data are transmitted in both ways between each LO 1 and the CMOC 3. As shown in Fig. 4, the maintenance data from the CMOC 3 is transferred to the LO 1 through another DL 422. That is, when a fault occurs in the LO 1, the operator at the CMOC 3 provides the maintenance data for the LO 1 by operating an operating console 352, observing a VDU 351 of a SCWS 35. The maintenance data made by the operator at the CMOC 3 is sent from an SND 37 in the CMOC 3 to an RCV 17 in the LO 1 through the DL 422. The second remote maintenance system of the prior art has the following merits compared with the first remote maintenance system of the prior art: 1) there is no necessity to use the telephone to send the maintenance data from the CMOC 3 to the LO 1; second, 2) there is no necessity to make the operator always stand by at the LO 1, and 3) there is no necessity to provide the MT because the initial loading to overcome the system-down can be executed by the maintenance data sent from the CMOC 3 through the DL 422. In the above, particularly the merits 2) and 3) contribute to reduce the maintenance costs for the network. However, the second remote maintenance system has a demerit that the exclusive data lines (DLs) 41 and 422 are necessary, which causes an increase in the facility costs and the running costs for the DLs 41 and 422. As far as reducing the cost for the exclusive data line, there is another system called a fourth remote maintenance system of the prior art, which uses the DTL 51 for transferring the operating status and alarm data from the LO 1 to the CMOC 3. This sytem has been disclosed in "CENTRALIZED SUPERVISORY SYSTEM" , U.S. Patent 4,575,839 to Yusuke Ogata et al., in Mar. 11, 1986. Figs. 5 and 6 illustrate the system of Ogata as the third remote maintenance system of the prior art. According to the fourth system of the prior art of Ogata, the operating status and alarm data from the LO 1 to the CMOC 3 are transferred through some channels of the DTL 51. The DTL 51 transfers the data under a pulse code modulation (PCM) system. One dot chain lines 43 in Figs. 5 and 6 indicate the channels. In Fig. 6, the operating status and the alarm information in LO 1 are gathered at the ALM 10, and the data of the information are created at the ALM 10 and sent to a common channel signaling equipment (CSE) 18 through a bus line 100. Then, the data are sent, under an ordinary common channel signaling system, to the NW 12 through an interface unit (INT) 19. Wherein, the ordinary common channel signaling system is, as well known, the very peculiar system used in the recent digital switching system. Thus, the operating status and alarm data are sent to the CMOC 3 through the NW 12 and the DT 13 in the LO 1 and the DTL 51 by using the channels 43. In the CMOC 3, the operating status and alarm data are sent to the MPR 31 through an NW 32, an INT 36 and a CSE 37, and processed in the MPR 31 so that the operating status and alarm data are stored in the MT 34 and displayed on a VDU in the SCWS 35. The INT 36 is an interface between the NW 32 and the CSE 37, and the CSE 37 is for sending data and signals under the common channel signaling system. In the fourth system of Ogata, the exclusive data line becomes unnecessary to transmit the operating status and alarm data from the LO to the CMOC. However, the maintenance data from CMOC 3 to the LO 1 cannot be transmitted through the DTL 51. Accordingly, an operator must be stationed at the LO 1 and the MT also must be provided at the LO 1, which is functionally similar to the case of the first remote maintenance system of the prior art. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Therefore, an object of the present invention is to reduce the operators at local offices of the digital communication network having a remote maintenance system, for reducing the personnel expenses. Another object of the present invention is to eliminate the exclusive data line for transmitting the alarm data and the maintenance data between each local office (LO) and the centralized maintenance and operation center (CMOC) of the remote maintenance system, for reducing the facilities costs of the network. Still another object of the present invention is to eliminate the data storing means such as a magnetic tape unit to store the program for the initial loading, from each LO, for reducing the facilities costs in each LO and the running costs thereof. Still more another object of the present invention is to execute the maintenance to the serious faults such as the system-down in the LO, without the operator and the data storing means at the LO. Still another object of the present invention is to make the CMOC acknowledge that LO which has a serious fault when the LO having the serious fault is located far from the CMOC through many tandem offices. The above objects of the present invention are achieved by performing the following matters: 1) transmitting the operating status and alarm data from each LO to the CMOC through the ordinary digital transmission line (DTL); 2) transmitting the maintenance data from the CMOC to each LO through the DTL; 3) applying No. 7 Common Channel Signaling System (CCS) recommended by International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee (CCITT) to the transmission of the alarm and the maintenance data between each LO and the CMOC; 4) grouping all LOs into several groups so that each group has at least two LOs; and 5) providing local exclusive data lines among the LOs in each group for executing the backup to each other when one of the LOs in the group has a serious fault. In accordance with the above matters 1) and 2), the personnel expenses and the facilities costs at the LO can be reduced. In accordance with the above matter 3), the transmission of the alarm data from the LO to the CMOC and of the maintenance data from the CMOC to the LO can be made easily, and the location of the LO having the serious fault can be easily found. Particularly, when there are tandem offices between the LO and the CMOC as shown in Fig. 10, the transmission can be made easily, and the location of the LO having the serious fault can be found easily. And, in accordance with the above matters 4) and 5), the maintenance of the serious faults such as the system-down at the LO can be executed without the operator and the data storing means at the LO. This is because of the following reason: when a serious fault such as system-down occurs at a first LO in the group, the switching network at the first LO cannot be used, so that the data transmission through the DTL between the first LO and the CMOC becomes impossible to be executed. In this case, the alarm data at the first LO can be transmitted to the CMOC through the local exclusive data line, another second LO connected to the first LO by the local exclusive data line, and the DTL between the second LO and the CMOC. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 is a block diagram of the first remote maintenance system of the prior art for illustrating the relationship between the LOs and the CMOC therein; Fig. 2 is a block diagram of the first remote maintenance system of the prior art for illustrating the relationship between an LO and the CMOC therein; Fig. 3 is a block diagram of the second remote maintenance system of the prior art for illustrating the relationship between the LOs and the CMOC therein; Fig. 4 is a block diagram of the second remote maintenance system of the prior art for illustrating the relationship between an LO and the CMOC therein; Fig. 5 is a block diagram of the third remote maintenance system of the prior art for illustrating the relationship between the LOs and the CMOC therein; Fig. 6 is a block diagram of the third remote maintenance system of the prior art for illustrating the relationship between an LO and the CMOC therein; Fig. 7 is a block diagram of the fourth remote maintenance system of the prior art for illustrating the relationship between the LOs and the CMOC therein; Fig. 8 is a block diagram of the fourth remote maintenance system of the prior art for illustrating the relationship between an LO and the CMOC therein; Fig. 9 is a block diagram of the remote maintenance system of the present invention for illustrating the relationship between the grouped LOs and the CMOC therein; Fig. 10 is a block diagram of the remote maintenance system of the present invention for illustrating the data and signal transmission route when there are many tandem offices between the grouped LOs and the CMOC therein; Fig. 11 is a block diagram of the first remote maintenance system embodying the present invention for illustrating the relationship between the grouped LOs connected by the LDL and the CMOC therein; Fig. 12 is a block diagram of one LO in the grouped LOs in the first remote maintenance system embodying the present invention; Fig. 13 is a block diagram of the second remote maintenance system embodying the present invention for illustrating the relationship between the grouped LOs connected by the LDL and the CMOC therein; and Fig. 14 is a block diagram of one LO in the grouped LOs in the second remote maintenance system embodying the present invention. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The expenses of the exclusive data lines, such as DLs 41 and 422 in Fig. 4, can be reduced to zero by transmitting not only the alarm data from the LO 1 to the CMOC 3 but also the maintenance data from the CMOC 3 to the LO 1 through the DTL 51 as shown in Figs. 7 and 8. (In Figs. 7 and 8, the same reference numerals and symbols as in Figs. 5 and 6 designate the same units or function as in Figs. 5 and 6.) In Figs. 7 and 8, reference numeral 43 indicates the data transmission with which the alarm data and the maintenance data can be transmitted in both ways between the LO 1 and the CMOC 3. However, if the network had such remote maintenance system as shown in Figs. 7 and 8, the system could not execute the maintenance to the serious fault such as system-down, because , the NW 12 in the LO 1 cannot be used under the system-down, so that the alarm and maintenance data cannot be transmitted between the LO 1 and the CMOC 3. The above problem in the remote maintenance system shown in Figs. 7 and 8 can be solved by remote maintenance systems embodying the present invention, shown in Fig. 9. (In Fig. 9, the same numericals and symbols as in Fig. 7 designate the same office function as in Fig. 7.) The remote maintenance systems embodying the present invention include two systems: a first system and a second system. Figs. 11 and 12 and Figs. 13 and 14 illustrate the first and the second system respectively. In Figs. 11 and 12, the same numeral or symbol as in Figs. 7 and 8 designates the same unit or function as in Figs. 7 and 8, and in Figs. 13 and 14, the same numeral or symbol as in Figs. 11 and 12 designates the same unit or function as in Fig. 11 and 12. As shown in Figs. 9 and 10, in the remote maintenance systems embodying the present invention, the alarm and the maintenance data are usually transmitted between the LO and the CMOC respectively by using the DTL 51, which is similar to the system in Figs. 7 and 8; however, the systems embodying the present invention differ from the system in Figs. 7 and 8, as follows: the LOs respectively connected to the CMOC through the DTL 51 are grouped so that each group includes two (or more) LOs, and in each group, the two LOs, (or two LOs adjacent to each other in case that more than two LOs are grouped), are connected by a local data line (LDL) 44 as shown in Fig. 9. This connection by the LDL 44 is for performing the backup of the LOs connected to each other when a serious fault such as system-down occurs at one of the grouped LOs. For instance, when an LO (a first LO) has the serious fault, another LO (a second LO) connected with the first LO performs the backup the first LO by transmitting the fault information from the first LO to the CMOC and the maintenance information from the CMOC to the first LO by using the switching function of the second LO. In the remote maintenance systems embodying the present invention, the difference between the first system and the second system is as follows: in the first system, when the serious fault occurs at the first LO, the maintenance data from the CMOC to the first LO are transmitted through the DTL (first DTL) between the first LO and the CMOC, and the LDL is used for transmitting the alarm information from the first LO to the CMOC; in the second system, when the serious fault occurs at the first LO, not only the alarm information from the first LO but also the maintenance data from the CMOC to the first LO are transmitted through the DTL connecting the second LO and the CMOC and the LDL. In the first and second remote maintenance systems embodying the present invention, two LOs are grouped; that is, in the first system shown in Figs. 11 and 12, LOs 1-1 and 1-2 are grouped, and in the second system shown in Figs. 13 and 14, LOs 1-3 and 1-4 are grouped. Figs. 11 and 13 illustrate the relationship of the data link among the grouped LOs and the CMOC, and Figs. 12 and 14 illustrate the details of one of the grouped LOs. Thus grouping the LOs and providing the LDL among the LOs in the group are a first point of the present invention. A second point of the present invention is to use No. 7 CCS for transmitting the alarm information and the maintenance data through the switching network in the backup LO and the DTL connecting the backup LO to the CMOC. As explained before, applying the No. 7 CCS, this data transmission in the centralized maintenance system becomes very simple even though tandem offices (TOs) exist on the way of a route from an LO 1 to the CMOC 3 as shown in Fig. 10. In Fig. 10, reference numerals 21, 22 and 23 indicate the TOs, and other numerals and symbols designate the same offices and function as in Fig. 9. In Fig. 10, if the transmission route for the alarm and maintenance data through the TO 22 is occupied by other transmitting signals, the data can be transmitted through the TO 23, which is owe to the No. 7 CCS system. Figs. 11 and 12 illustrate the first remote maintenance system embodying the present invention. Fig. 11 illustrates the relationship between the grouped LOs and the CMOC, and the Fig. 12 illustrates the details of an LO (LO 1-1) being one of the grouped LOs in Fig. 11. In Figs. 11 and 12, the same reference numeral as in Fig. 8 designates the same unit or function as in Fig. 8. In Fig. 11, the supervisory data and the ordinary alarm signal in a first LO (LO 1-1) and a second LO (LO 1-2 are sent to the CMOC through the DTLs 511 and 512 with the operation of the NWs 12 in the LOs 1-2 and 1-2 respectively. However, when a serious fault occurs, for example, in the LO 1-1, a serious alarm signal, which is a ground signal for informing that the serious fault occurs in the LO, is outputted from the MPR 11 in the LO 1-1. However, because of the serious fault the NW 12 in the LO 1-1 cannot be used. Accordingly, in the first system embodying the present invention, the serious alarm signal is sent to the LO 1-2 through the LDL 441. Then the LO 1-2 sends the serious alarm signal to the CMOC through the DTL 512 and at the same time controls the LO 1-1 so that the maintenance data, for repairing the serious fault in the LO 1-1, sent from the CMOC can be received without using the NW 12 in the LO 1-1. To achieve the above, an alarm control unit (ALMCU) 101 and a loader (LD) 20 are newly provided in each LO. Fig. 12 illustrates the detail function in the LO 1-1. In Fig. 12, the supervisory information and the ordinary fault information, which are obtained by an ordinary fault detector 102, are gathered to the ALMCU 101 and controlled the MPR so that the ordinary alarm signal is sent to the CSE 18 through a serial information adapter (SIA) 25 and the bus line 100. The supervisory information and the ordinary alarm signal arrived at the SIA 25 are modified so as to be sent to the CMOC under the No. 7 CCS system through the INT 19 and the NW 12 by the operation of the MPR 11, and through the LD 20, the DT 13 and the DTL 511. The maintenance data for repairing the ordinary fault in the LO 1-1 are provided by the operator at the CMOC and sent to the LO 1-1 through the DTL 511. The maintenance data arrived at the LO 1-1 are fed to the NW 12 through the DT 13 and the LD 20 and sent to the CSE 18. The maintenance data sent from the CMOC under the No. 7 CCS system are changed to the regular data at the CSE 18 and sent to the MPR 11 in which the ordinary fault is repaired. When the serious fault such as system-down occurs in the LO 1-1, the MPR 11 and the NW 12 in the LO 1-1 cannot be used. However, in this case, a serious alarm signal due to the serious fault is sent from an emergency action/control unit (EMA) 111 in the MPR 11 to an alarm exterior terminal (ALEXT) 21 through a line L1 in the LO 1-1. Wherein, the serious alarm signal from the EMA 111 will be called a "first alarm signal" hereinafter. The first alarm signal is also sent to an alarm indicator panel unit (ALIPU) 22 in the LO 1-1 by which the occurrence of the serious fault is indicated. As shown in Fig. 11, the first alarm signal from the ALEXT 21 in the LO 1-1 is sent to the ALEXT 21 in the LO 1-2 through the LDL 441. Wherein, the LO 1-2 has the same construction and function as those of the LO 1-1 and operates normally in this explanation. The first alarm signal arrived at the ALEXT 21 in the LO 1-2 is fed to the ALMCU 101 in the LO 1-2 along a line (L) 2 as shown in the LO 1-2 in Fig. 11; the details of the above may be realized in Fig. 12 by imagining that Fig. 12 were for the LO 1-2. In Fig. 12, the L2 consists of a plurality of lines, which means that the L2 includes other serious alarm signals wich will be stated later. When the ALMCU 101 in the LO 1-2 receives the first alarm signal, the ALMCU 101 outputs an LD control signal and sends it to the ALEXT 21 in the LO 1-2 through a line (L) 3. The LD control signal passing through the ALEXT 21 in the LO 1-2 is sent to the ALEXT 21 in the LO 1-1 through the LDL 441 as shown in Fig. 11. The LD control signal passing through the ALEXT 21 in the LO 1-1 is fed to the LD 20 through a line (L) 4. Then the LD 20 operates so that the connection from the DTL 511 to the NW 12 through the DT 13 is changed toward the EMR 111 in the MPR 11 through a CSE 24. More precisely, a route L10 - L11 is changed to a route L10 - L12; wherein, the L10 is a line connecting the DT 13 with the LD 20, the L11 is a line connecting the LD 20 with the NW 12 and the L12 is a line connecting the LD 20 with the CSE 24 as shown in Fig. 12. The first alarm signal from the EMA 111 is a simple ON-OFF signal, which is usually called a "ground signal" for only alarming that a serious fault occurs in the LO 1-1. Therefore, the detail data of the serious fault cannot be sent to the CMOC 3 by the first alarm signal. However, when the LD 20 operates so as to make the route L10 - L12, the serious alarm data can be sent from the EMA 111 to the CMOC through the route L12 - L10 and the DTL 511, so that the serious fault in the LO 1-1 can be analyzed by the operator at the CMOC 3, and the maintenance data for repairing the serious fault can be sent back to the EMR 111 in the LO 1-1 through the same route as the route through which the serious alarm data have been sent to the CMOC 3 from the LO 1-1. In the above explanation, the serious fault is mainly due to the trouble of the software for operating the MPR 11. The EMA 111 is a unit for automatically detecting the fault in the MPR 11, and primarily sending the first alarm signal and secondly sending the serious alarm data in the LO 1-1 to the CMOC 3. In the recent electric switching offices, there are many means for automatically supervising the state of the switching operation. For example, an externally supervisory Equipment (ESE) 23 is one of the supervisory means. The ESE 23 is for automatically supervising the operation of the NW 12 including the operation of the MPR 11. The output, which is a serious fault signal, which will be called a second alarm signal hereinafter, from the ESE 23 is fed to the EMA 111. The second alarm signal is also sent to the ALIPU 22 for indicating that there is the second alarm signal in the LO 1-1. In the above explanation, the first and second alarm signals relate to the system-down due to the MPR 11 and/or the NW 12; however, the system-down also occurs due to power-down in the LO 1-1. A power alarm unit (PAL) 26 is for detecting the power-down and producing a third alarm signal when the power-down occurs. The third alarm signal is sent to the ALEXT 21 through a line (L) 6 and also sent to the ALEXT 21 in the LO 1-2 through the LDL 441; wherein, in Fig. 11, the line for transmitting the third alarm signal is omitted to be depicted in the LDL 441. Similarly to the case of the second alarm signal, the third alarm signal passing through the ALEXT 21 in the LO 1-2 is fed to the ALMCU 101 through one line of the L2. However, in the case of the third alarm signal, the ALMCU 101 in the second LO operates so that the third alarm signal is transmitted to the CMOC 3 through the SIA 25, the bus line 100, the CSE 18, the INT 10, the NW 12, the LD 20, the DT 13, which are in the LO 1-2, and the DTL 512. Because, in the case of the third alarm signal, the power in the LO 1-1 is down, so that the LD 20 in the LO 1-1 cannot operate if the ALMCU 101 in the LO 1-2 sends the LD control signal to the LD 21 in the LO 1-1. In the case of the third alarm signal, the remote maintenance cannot be executed because the power in the LO 1-1 is down, so that an operator is sent to the LO 1-1 for repairing a power supply system, which is not depicted in Fig. 12, in the LO 1-1. As explained above, the serious alarm signals sent to the LO 1-2 from the LO 1-1 are all the simple ground signals. Therefore, simple conductors such as bare wires can be applied to the LDL 441, which results in reducing the costs for the LDL 441. Of course applying the first remote maintenance system embodying the present invention to the digital communication network, the costs of the lines for transmitting these alarm signals and also the maintenance data between the LO 1-1 and the CMOC 3 can be reduced. The second remote maintenance system embodying the present invention will be disclosed referring to Figs. 13 and 14. Fig. 13 is for explaining the relationship of the connection between the grouped LOs (LO 1-3 and LO 1-4) and the CMOC 3. Fig. 14 illustrates the details of one of the grouped LOs, for example, the LO 1-3. Similarly to the case of Figs. 11 and 12, the second remote maintenance system embodying the present invention will be discussed under the assumption that the serious fault occurs in the LO 1-3 and the LO 1-4 performs the backup to the LO 1-3. The feature of the second remote maintenance system embodying the present invention is that the loader unit (LD) and the TDL 511 between the LO 1-3 and the CMOC 3 are not used for transmitting the serious alarm data and the maintenance data between the LO 1-3 and the CMOC, as done in the first remote maintenance system, and, instead of using the LD and the TDL 511, the serious alarm data sent from the LO 1-3 to the CMOC 3 and the maintenance data from the CMOC 3 to the LO 1-3 are transmitted through the DTL 512 between the LO 1-4 and the CMOC 3, the LO 104 and an LDL 442 between the LOs 1-3 and 1-4, as shown in Fig. 13. When the serious fault such as system-down occurs in the LO 1-3, the first alarm signal from the EMA 111 is sent to the ALEXT 21 through the L1 in the LO 1-3. Then the first alarm signal from the ALEXT 21 in the LO 1-3 are sent to the ALMCU 101 in the LO 1-4 through the LDL 442, ALEXT 21 in the LO 1-4 and the L2 in the LO 1-4. This is the same as the case of the first remote maintenance system embodying the present invention. When the first alarm signal is fed to the ALMCU 101 in the LO 1-4, the ALMCU 101 in the LO 1-4 controls so that the serious alarm signal is sent to the CMOC 3 through the SIA 25, the bus line 100, the CSE 18, the INT 19, the NW 12, the DT 13, which are in the LO 1-4, and DTL 512. Then, as the CMOC 3, the operator at the CMOC 3 investigates the serious alarm signal from the LO 1-3 and sends the maintenance data for remotely repairing the serious fault in the LO 1-3. However, in the second remote maintenance system embodying the present invention, the maintenance data from the CMOC 3 are not sent to the LO 1-3 using the DTL 511 as the first system, they are sent to the LO 1-3 through the DTL 512, the LO 1-3 and the LDL 442. That is, the maintenance data arrived at the LO 1-4 are sent to a modem (MD) 28 in the LO 1-4 through the DT 18, the NW 12, the INT 19, the CSE 18, the bus line 100 and the SIA 27 in the LO 1-4. The maintenance data from the MD 28 in the LO 1-4 are sent to a modem (MD) 29 in the LO 1-3 through a high quality transmission line such as a coaxial cable, in the LDL 442. The maintenance data arrived at the MD 29 in the LO 1-3 are sent to the EMA 111 in the MPR 11 in the LO 1-3 so as to repair the serious fault. As mentioned above, in the second remote maintenance system, the high quality transmission line is used in the LDL 442 instead of providing the LD 20 in each LO as in the case of the first remote maintenance system. When a serious fault such as power-down occurs in the second maintenance system, similarly to the case of the first remote maintenance system, the PAL 26 produces a third alarm signal which is sent to the ALMCU 101 in the LO 1-4 and the third alarm signal is sent to the CMOC 3 through the same route as that in the case of the first or second alarm signal. As stated in the explanation of the first remote maintenance system embodying the present invention, when the power-down occurs in the LO, an operator must be sent to the LO having a fault due to the power-down. However, when the operator executes the initial program loading, it is not required to provide the MT previously in the LO 1-3 for storing the loading data in the LO 1-3, because the loading data can be sent from the CMOC 3. Usually, in the digital communication network consisting of a plurality of digital electronic switching offices, mostly the system-down occurs as the serious fault due to the fault in the MPR including the fault of the software, and a power-down is rare. Therefore, applying the first or second remote maintenance system of the present invention to the digital communication network, an operator is not required to be always stationed and the MT does not also need to be provided at each LO.

Claims: A remote maintenance system for a digital communication network, said system comprising: a toll digital switching center (TC) comprising a center digital switching network operating under No. 7 common channel signaling (CCS) system recommended by International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee (CCITT); a plurality of local digital switching offices (LOs) each comprising: a local digital switching network (NW) operating under said No. 7 CCS system, ordinary fault detecting means for automatically detecting an ordinary fault occurring in said LO and outputting an ordinary fault signal, said ordinary fault being a fault that said NW operates normally when said ordinary fault occurs in said LO; alarm controlling means comprising a unit for receiving said ordinary fault signal and outputting an ordinary alarm signal, said ordinary alarm signal being a signal by which occurrence of said ordinary fault in said LO is indicated; serious fault detecting and repairing means for automatically detecting a serious fault occurring in said LO, automatically outputting a serious alarm signal and serious alarm data and repairing said serious fault in accordance with maintenance data (second maintenance data) for repairing said serious fault, said serious fault being a fault due to which said NW is failed, said serious alarm signal being a signal by which occurrence of said serious fault in said LO is indicated and said serious alarm data being data including details of said serious fault; a digital transmission line (DTL) for transmitting, between each of said LOs and said TC, data and/or signals relating to ordinary communication in the digital communication network, for transmitting said ordinary alarm signal, said serious alarm signal and said serious data from said LO to said TC, and for transmitting maintenance data (first maintenance data) for repairing said ordinary fault and said second maintenance data from said TC to said LO; a centralized maintenance and operation center (CMOC) located at said TC and operatively connected to each of said LOs through said TC and said DTL, for remotely repairing said ordinary fault by producing and sending said first maintenance data to said LO when said ordinary alarm signal is sent from said LO to said CMOC and for remotely repairing said serious fault by producing and sending said second maintenance data to said LO when said serious alarm signal and said serious alarm data are sent from said LO to said CMOC; a plurality of groups of said LOs, each of said groups including at least two LOs; a local data line (LDL) operatively connected between two LOs in said group comprising a line for transmitting said serious alarm signal from one LO (first LO) of said two LOs to said CMOC through another LO (second LO) of said two LOs in said group and said DTL (second DTL) connecting said second LO to said TC and said TC, when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and said second LO operates normally and wherein each of said LO's further comprises; data sending and receiving means for sending, under said No. 7 CCS system, said ordinary alarm signal to said CMOC and receiving said first maintenance data sent, under said No. 7 CCS system, from said CMOC, respectively through said NW in said second LO, said DTL and said TC, when said ordinary fault occurs in said LO, and for sending, under said No. 7 CCS system, said serious alarm signal from said first LO to said CMOC and receiving said second maintenance data sent, under said No. 7 CCS system, from said CMOC, respectively through said TC, said second DTL and said NW in said second LO, when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and said second LO operates normally. A remote maintenance system according to claim 1, said system further comprising loader means for changing a route continued from said DTL into said LO so that: said route connects said DTL to said NW when said LO operates normally or said ordinary fault occurs in said LO; and said route connects said DTL to said serious fault detecting and repairing means when said serious fault occurs in said first LO, said loader means changing said route so that said DTL is connected to said serious fault detecting and repairing means in said first LO by a loader control signal sent from said second LO operating normally. A remote maintenance system according to claim 2, wherein: said alarm control means further comprises , in said second LO, a unit for outputting said loader control signal by receiving said serious alarm signal sent from said serious fault detecting and repairing means in said first LO, when said-serious fault occurs in said first LO and second LO operates normally; and said LDL further comprises lines for sending said serious alarm signal from said serious fault detecting and repairing means in said first LO to said second LO and for sending said loader control signal from said second LO to said first LO. A remote maintenance system according to claim 1, wherein: said alarm control means further comprises , in said second LO, a unit for making said data sending and receiving means in said second LO send said serious signal and said serious data, sent from said first LO, to said CMOC, and for making said data sending and receiving means in said second LO receive said second maintenance data from said CMOC, when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and said second LO operates normally; and said LDL further comprises lines for sending said second maintenance data received at said second LO, from said second LO to said first LO, when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and said second LO operates normally. A remote maintenance system according to claim 4, said system further comprising: data sending means, in said second LO, for sending said second maintenance data sent from said CMOC, to said serious fault detecting and repairing means in said first LO through said LDL, when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and said second LO operates normally; and data receiving means, in said first LO, for receiving said maintenance data sent from said data sending means in said second LO through said LDL, said maintenance data received at said data receiving means in said first LO being fed to said serious fault detecting and repairing means in said first LO, when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and said second LO operates normally. A remote maintenance system according to claim 1, said system further comprising an external supervisory equipment (ESE) for supervising switching operation of said NW, said ESE outputting a fault signal to said serious fault detecting and repairing means, said serious fault detecting and repairing means automatically outputting said serious alarm signal and said serious alarm data. A remote maintenance system according to claim 2, further comprising a second data sending and receiving means, located between said serious fault detecting and repairing means and said loader means, for sending serious alarm data to said CMOC under said No. 7 CCS system through said loader means and receiving said second maintenance data sent from said CMOC under said No. 7 CCS system through said loader means. A remote maintenance system according to claim 3, said system further comprising power-down alarm (PAL) means for sensing that a power-down fault occurs in one LO (first LO) of said two LOs in said group and outputting a power-down alarm signal from said first LO to said another LO (second LO), operating normally, of said two LOs in said group. A remote maintenance system according to claim 8, wherein: said alarm control means, in said second LO, further comprises a unit for receiving said power-down alarm signal sent from said first LO and outputting said loader control signal; and said LDL further comprises a line for sending said power-down alarm signal from said first LO to said alarm control means in said second LO A remote maintenance system according to claim 5, said system further comprising power-down alarm (PAL) means for sensing that a power-down fault occurs in one LO (first LO) of said two LOs in said group and outputting a power-down alarm signal from said first LO to said another LO (second LO), operating normally, of said two LOs in said group. A remote maintenance system according to claim 10, wherein: said alarm control means, in said first LO, further comprises a unit for receiving said power-down alarm signal and making said data sending and receiving means send a power-down alarm signal to said CMOC; and said LDL further comprises a line for sending said power-down alarm signal from said first LO to said alarm control means in said second LO. A remote maintenance system for a digital communication network, said system comprising: a toll digital switching center (TC) comprising a center digital switching network; a plurality of local digital switching offices (LOs) divided into a plurality of groups so that each group includes at least two LOS, each LO in said group comprising a local digital switching network (NW) and first means for automatically outputting a serious alarm signal and serious alarm data when a serious fault occurs in said LO and for automatically repairing said serious fault by using maintenance data, said serious fault being a fault due to which switching operation of said NW is failed, said serious alarm signal being a signal by which occurrence of said serious fault in said LO is alarmed, said serious alarm data being data for detailing said serious fault and said maintenance data being data for repairing said serious fault; a centralized maintenance and operation center (CMOC), being located at said TC, for remotely being alarmed that said serious fault occurs in said LO by receiving said serious alarm signal from said LO and for remotely repairing said serious fault in said LO by providing and sending said maintenance data to said LO when said CMOC receives said serious alarm signal and/or data from said LO; digital transmission line (DTL) means, connecting said LO and said TC respectively, for performing ordinary communication transmission in the digital communication network and for transmitting said serious alarm signal, said serious alarm data and said maintenance data between said LO and said CMOC; and local data transmission line (LDL) means, connecting between two LOS in said group, comprising a line for transmitting said serious alarm signal from one (first LO) of said two LOs in said group to said CMOC through said the other (second LO) of said two LOs, said DTL means connecting between said second LO and said TC and said TC, when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and said second LO operates normally. A remote maintenance system according to claim 12, wherein: said LO further comprises terminal means for connecting said LO to said DTL means, second means for sending said alarm data from said first means to said CMOC through first DTL means, connecting between one (first LO) of said two LOs in said group, and said TC, avoiding said alarm data passing through said NW in said first LO when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and for leading said maintenance data received from said CMOC to said first means through said first DTL means, avoiding said maintenance data passing through said NW in said first LO when said serious fault occurs in said first LO, by changing connection from said terminal means to said NW to connection from said terminal means to said first means in said first LO, said changing being performed by a second means control signal received from the other (second LO) of said two LOs when said second LO operates normally, and third means, in said second LO, for outputting said second means control signal to said second means in said first LO when said serious fault occurs in said first LO, said second LO operates normally and said third means in said second LO receives said alarm signal from said first means in said first LO; and said LDL means further comprises a line for transmitting said second means control signal from said third means in said second LO to said second means in said first LO when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and said second LO operates normally. A remote maintenance system according to claim 12, wherein: said LO further comprises data receiving means, in one (first LO) of said two LOs in said group, for receiving said maintenance data sent from said CMOC through said TC, second DTL, connecting between the other (second LO) of said two LOs and said TC, said second LO and said LDL when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and said second LO operates normally, said maintenance data received at said data receiving means being fed to said first means in said first LO, and data sending means, in said second LO, for sending said maintenance data received, at said second LO, from said CMOC through said TC and said second DTL, to said data receiving means in said first LO through said LDL when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and said second LO operates normally; and said LDL means further comprises a line for transmitting said maintenance data from said data sending means in said second LO to said data receiving means in said first LO when said serious fault occurs in said first LO and said second LO operates normally.

Inventors: KAWANO, HISAO, YAMAMOTO, KUNIO
Applicants: FUJITSU LIMITED
Application year: 1988
Main classification: H04Q11
IPC codes: H04Q11, H04Q9, H04M3