USE OF A IMMUNISTIMULATING BIOLOGIC TO MANUFACTURE A MEDICAMENT TO TREAT HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS

Abstract: A method is provided for inhibiting the replication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the etiologic agent responsible for AIDS. The method involves contacting cells infected with HIV virus with a non-toxic, immunostimulating biologic in the presence of white blood cells. The biologic is identified and designated by ATCC accession No. 40105. The method of the invention results in increased Natural Killer and helper/inducer cells, together with a decrease in suppressor cells.

Description: This is a continuation-in-part of application Serial No. 07/056,452, Filed June 1, 1987, which is a continuation of application Serial No. 06/785,990, Filed October 10, 1985, now U.S. Patent No. 4,687,665, which is a division of application Serial No. 06/598,744, Filed April 10, 1984, now U.S. Patent No. 4,572,834. The present invention is broadly concerned with a method for the treatment of immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the etiologic agent of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). More particularly, it is concerned with a method wherein cells infected with HIV are contacted with an immunostimulating biologic in the presence of white blood cells; the biologic is identified and designated by ATCC accession No. 40105, and is fully described in U.S. Patent No. 4,572,834. Vaccines have been in use since Edward Jenner (1749-1823) first recognized that people exposed to non-virulent strains of microorganisms could be protected against infection by the related virulent strains. His vaccination of patients with exudate of cowpox sores provided those same patients with partial protection against smallpox. Numerous vaccines have subsequently been prepared and used in both humans and animals. Immunization has been accomplished by vaccination with a suspension of live, attenuated, or killed organisms or specific protein, glycoprotein or surface material from various bacteria, rickettsiae, or viruses. These would include vaccines against anthrax, rabies, typhoid, cholera, smallpox, measles, mumps, pertussis, plague, and polio. The vaccine in each case has been intended to provide protection against a specific pathogen. While vaccination may provide long term specific protection it may or may not produce short term immunosystem modulation. The immune system responds to challenge via vaccination or infection by increased activity. This may result in the short term production of antigen non-specific immunoregulatory modulators such as interferon, interleukins, and other various lymphokines. The rationale for a system that becomes active only in response to a specific challenge is simple. If the immune system operated at a high pitch of activity all the time, it would age prematurely and no longer provide the systematic protection it was evolved to deliver. Another possible complication with an unusually active immune system could be the initiation of auto-immune reactions in which the system starts acting against itself, resulting in the destruction of normal tissue. Arthritis is exemplary of this particular condition. Increased activity of the immune system by virtue of improper regulation could furthermore result in an inability to elicit an appropriate response. As an example, a massive response to a splinter in a finger would be completely inappropriate, just as no response to a major infection would be equally inappropriate. Immunomodulation may provide a regulatory-directed approach at self-healing, particularly with respect to such intractable diseases as cancer. For this to occur two minimal criteria must be met. The immune system must be sufficiently intact to respond to the regulator(s), and secondly, the system under appropriate stimulation must have T-cells, B-cells and Natural Killer cells present that are capable of responding to the target antigen(s) or cell(s). In such an instance, however, a nonspecific immunomodulator could potentially serve to "turn on" the immune sytem and initiate healing. A number of immunomodulators have previously been isolated and described and these appear to belong to one of three general groups, namely the interferons, the interleukins and the corticosteroids and leukotrienes. The interferons are a family of glycoproteins normally produced in response to a viral infection and are produced by leukocytes and fibroblasts. There are three main types, alpha, beta and gamma. They have molecular weights in the range of 15,000 to 40,000 daltons. Recently they have been produced by recombinant DNA techniques. The interferons have been found to be specie restricted and are normally only effective in specie that produced it. The second group of immunomodulators are the interleukins. They are a family of glycoproteins that are produced by white cells. It is believed that the lymphokines cause the activation of Natural Killer cells and B-cells, and act in the initiation and propagation of the specific sequences of cellular interactions that are now recognized as the immune response. These growth promoters and activators participate in the generation of immunoreactive cells. The lymphokines are antigen non-specific in that they activate all T and B cells in anticipation of the presentation of an antigen or a cell. The apparent molecular weights are in the range of 15,000 - 50,000 daltons. To date, treatment protocols for cancer patients involving interleukins have been of an in vitro character, i.e., blood is withdrawn from the patient, treated in vitro , and returned to the patient. This is a relatively cumbersome process and is subject to all of the typical problems attendant to in vitro , as opposed to in vivo , procedures. The third type of regulators are the corticosteroids and the leukotrienes, which act as regulators in inflammation. When produced in atypical amount, the leukotrienes can cause immediate type hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis. They are principally oxygenated products of archidonic acid. In contrast the corticosteroids and leukotrienes are small molecular weight compounds in comparison to the interleukins and interferons. All of the immunological regulators produced commerically are extracts or concentrates of tissue culture fluids from mitogen stimulated lymphoid and myleloid cells. The exceptions to this are interferons and IL-2 which have been produced by genetic engineering. The other immunological modulators that have been artificially produced are the interferons. The difficulty with each of these production methods is that the individual reagents being produced do not reproduce the plethoric effect seen in vivo . No practical method has heretofore been discovered to produce a plurality of the immunoregulators together in the same proportions as they would normally be produced in response to infection or cancer in situ . Additionally, the cost of prior known production methods has been considerable, thereby further limiting the utility of immunomodulators. Clinical treatments for retroviral infections such as HIV have been directed at one of five major steps in viral proliferation. In particular, the five major steps of HIV replication involve: (1) attachment to a CD4 receptor; (2) uncoating of the virus; (3) reverse transcription of the viral RNA to DNA; (4) transcription of viral DNA; and, (5) assembly and release of intact viral particles. Currently there are treatment modalties that effect each of the foregoing states of retrovirus replication. The first stage of infection is by direct physical interaction between the virus and a receptor present on a CD4 cell. In the case of HIV, two compounds appear to interfere with virus attachment. Though still controversial, AL721 and Peptide T may inhibit binding (Sarin et al., New England J. Med. 313:4075, 1985; Pert et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:9254, 1986). The clinical utility of these compounds is yet to be clearly documented, however. The next possible point of inhibition is directed at virus specific enzymes. Reverse transcriptase has thus far only been found associated with the retroviruses. A number of chemicals have been demonstrated to inhibit this enyzme. The list includes Suramin (De Clercq, Antiviral Res 7:1, 1987; Mitsuya et al., Science 226:172, 1984), Ansamycin (Anand et al., Lancet 1:97 (letter), 1986, Azidothymidine (AZT) (Hartshorn et al., Antimicrob Agents Chemother 31:168, 1987); Mitsuya et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:7096, 1985), Dideoxycytidine (Mitsuya et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:7096, 1985), Dideoxcytidinene (Balzarini et al., Biochem Biophys Res Comm 140:735, 1986), Dideoxythymidine (Baba et al, Biochem Biophy Res Commun 142:128, 1987), 3′-azido-2′, 3′-dideoxyquanosine (Hartman et al., Lancet 2:40 (letter), 1987), phosphonoformate (Hartshorn et al., Antimicrob Agents Chemother 30:189, 1986); Sandstrom et al., Lancet 1:1480, 1985); and HPA-23 (Dormont et al., Ann Inst Pasteur/Virol, 136E:75, 1985); Schinazi et al., Progeram and Abstracts of the 26th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, New Orleans (Abstract 1093) 1986, p 296). The only drug thus far proven clinically useful is AZT, and its utility is limited by toxicity. In theory, the approach to limiting virus replication by the use of reverse transcriptase inhibitors appears workable. In practice however, while the virus appears to replicate at a slower rate, the outcome has remained the same, i.e., death of the patient. Efforts have also been made to inhibit replication of HIV during transcription of DNA to mRNA. Clinically, the most potent inhibitor found for transcriptional inhibition is Ribavirin (McCormick et al., Lancet 2:1367, 1984). Ribavirin resembles guansine chemically and inhibits Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase (IMDase). Ribavirin further interferes with the guanylation step for 5′ capping of viral mRNA and viral RNA polymerase (Gilbert et al., Antimicrob Agents Chemother 30:201, 1986). However, Ribavirin has proved ineffect in the treatment of HIV infections. The next possible point of intervention in viral replication is by reducing viral assemly and/or release. To date, no drugs have been identified which selectively interfere with viral assembly and release. One biologic, alpha-A-interferon, does exhibit this activity while recombinate IFN-alpha-A-Interferon has been found to inhibit HIV replication in vitro , the same degree of inhibition is not found when the interferon is used clinically (Ho et al., Lancet 1:602, 1985; Hartshorn et al., AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 1987). The limited degree of success found with respect to individual treatment regimes has lead to the use of combination modalities. Combination chemotherapy has been used in the treatment of bracterial and fungal infections, and in oncology. Combination chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus biologic treatment has not been extensively utilized for viral infections. Synergy in vitro has been found with PFA plus interferon, PFA plus Ribavirin, AZT plus interferon, and AZD plus acyclovir (Broder et al., Lancet 2:627, 1985; Yarchoan et al., New Englang J. Med. 316:557, 1987). Currently, the clinical utility of these combinations is under investigation (The Therapy of AIDS and Related Disorders, NIH workshop, May 3-4, 1984, Washington (unpublished transcript of proceedings; Lotze et al., J Immunol 134:157, 1985; Lotze et al., Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 3:51, 1984; Lotze et al., Gottlieb MS, Groopman JE (eds): Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, P 409, New York, Alan R. Liss, 1984; and Lane et al., J Biol Response Mod, 1984). In fact, therapy with interleukin-2 has failed to be effective, and it is now known that HIV infects activated cells. Therefore, IL-2 is contraindicated for AIDS due to IL-2 activation of resting cells. In summary, all attempted treatments for AIDS have failed to kill HIV-infected cells or to otherwise remove the virus from circulation. Accordingly, there is a very great and unresolved need in the art for a method of effectively inhibiting the replication of human immunodeficiency virus, and indeed this problem has been characterized as the greatest public health threat of the twentieth century. The principal object of the present invention is to provide a method for inhibiting the replication of human immunodeficiency virus through the use of a non-toxic biologic of the type described in U.S. Patent No. 4,572,834. The method of the invention broadly comprises contacting HIV-infected cells with an immunostimulating biologic in the presence of white blood cells. This biologic is identified and designated by ATCC accession No. 40105. In preferred forms of the invention, the immunostimultant is prepared by injecting a virus into an animal, and permitting the injected animal to react to the presence of the virus for a period of time for developing in the animal's blood serum significant concentrations of the desired biologic. The specifically preferred method for obtaining the biologic is set forth in full detail below. However, it is to be understood that other methods of obtaining the biologic may well be more economical and direct, e.g., such as by genetic engineering. The terms of in vivo human treatment modalities, the preferred methods of treatment will be by intravenous injection of the immunostimulant biologic in either purified or partially purified form; but it is also believed that other routes of administration will be applicable, such as intramuscular, subcutaneous, and intradermal injections. The presently preferred method of obtaining the biologic involves injecting a virus such as a parvovirus into an animal, and permitting the injected animal to react to the presence of the virus for a period of time in order to develop in the animal's blood serum biologic in sufficient quantity and/or activity that 50 microliters of the animal's serum, when added to an in vitro human white blood cell culture containing 2-4 x 10⁵ white blood cells and followed by 3 days incubation at 37° C. und a 5% CO₂/95% air atmosphere, will give rise to at least about a 50% increase in Natural Killer cells in the biologic-supplemented cell culture, as compared with an otherwise identical and identically cultured in vitro cell culture having added thereto 50 microliters of serum from a normal animal of the same species as the injected animal. The final step in the method involves recovering serum from the injected animal which contains the desired biologic. In particularly preferred forms the animal in question is a goat, and the virus injected is a Parvovirus of a type which is immunosuppressive in a normal permissive host animal (e.g., a cat or dog) for the Parvovirus. Thus, in the presently preferred method of the invention, use is made of a normally immunosuppressive virus in a non-permissive host for the virus; quite surprisingly however, this serves to develop an immunostimulative biologic in the injected animal's serum which has the salutory effects outlined above. In other forms, the injected animal can be selected from the group consisting of goats, horses, sheep, rabbits and monkeys, with the period of time after injection of the virus being at least about one month. The injected and immunized animal's serum can be used in relatively crude form, such as after only conventional ammonium sulfate fractionation. In other instances, however, the fractionated serum is subjected to further isolation procedures, in order to substantially purify the biologic. In actual practice, a number of test goats are normally immunized with Parvovirus, and the serum of these goats is tested after an appropriate time (e.g., about 3 months) for the presence of biologic using the standard outlined above. Those animals which are positives, i.e., their serum exhibits the biologic in the manner defined, are then bled and their serum, containing the biologic, is recovered. Figures 1-3 are respectively chromatography profiles developed as a result of first stage, second stage and third stage column chromatographies of ammonium sulfate fractionated Parvovirus-immunized positive goat serum in accordance with the preferred method of producing the biologic of the invention. The following examples set forth the most preferred method of producing biologic used in the method of the invention. EXAMPLE I This Example sets forth the preferred procedures for the production and recovery of the biologic of the present invention. Goat Vaccination A total of five normal goats were initially hypervaccinated with Parvovirus in multiple sites on their dorsal rear halves, using a total of 1 ml. of commercially available Feline Pan Leukopenia vaccine (Dellen Laboratories, Inc., Westwood, Maine). Thereafter, at invervals of about one and two months after the initial injection, each goat was again injected with 1 cc. total quantities of Canine Origin Parvovirus vaccine (Fromm Laboratories, Inc., Grafton, Wisconsin or Duramune Vaccine, Temple, Texas). At the end of about three months from the date of the initial injection, a sample of whole blood was withdrawn from the carotid artery of the neck of each goat, and the samples treated as hereinafter described. Goat Plasma Preparation The goat blood samples were separately centrifuged (about 500 ml. at a time) using a fixed angle rotor centrifuge operated at 2000 rpm for 45 minutes to pellet the red blood cells. The plasma was then removed from the packed red cells in each sample, and volumetrically measured. An absorbance reading (280 nm) of each plasma sample diluted 1:50 with PBS (pH 7.5) was then taken for record purposes. Serum Preparation Reagents Employed: 1.0 molar calcium Chloride 14.7 g CaCl₂2H₂O in 100 ml distilled water Saline 9 g Sodium Chloride in 100 ml distilled water Procedure: Use 1.0 ml of 1. molar calcium chloride for each 100 ml of plasma. 1. The required amount of calcium chloride was added to each measured plasma sample in a beaker. 2. The respective plasma/calcium chloride mixtures were then stirred gently and thereafter each beaker was placed in a coldbox overnight. 3. The clotted plasma in each beaker was cut up into small pieces. 4. Each mixture was then poured into a respective centrifuge tube, and the tubes were spun 10,000 rpm for 30 minutes. 5. Serum was then carefully removed from the clot at the bottom of each of the tubes to give separate serum samples. 6. For each sample the serum volume and an absorbance reading at 280 nm was taken and recorded. Biologic Determination An in vitro assay was next performed on the serum samples derived from each of the test goats, in order to determine which of the goats produced the desired biologic in sufficient quantity. Normal human white cells were first cultured in RPMI-1640 media (a standard tissue culture media produced by K. C. Biological of Lenexa, Kansas) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Fifty microliters of each of the goat test serums produced as described previously were then added to respective cultures each containing 2-4 x 10⁵ cultured human white blood cells in a total volume of 0.2 ml. The cultures, with goat serum added, were then incubated in an atmosphere of 5% CO₂/95% air at 37° C. for 3 days. Each separate culture was then stained with two types of fluorescent-labeled monoclonal antibodies respectively specific against T-helper cells (CD4) OKT-4 monoclonal antibody sold by Ortho Diagnostic of Raritan, New Jersey) and Natural Killer cells (CD 16) (LEU-7 monoclonal antibody sold by The Becton-Dickinson Co. of Mountain View, California). The stainings were performed following the supplier's directions, and after about one hour, the stained samples were analyzed using a flow cytometry device, namely a model 50H cytofluorograph (Ortho Instruments, Westwood, Mass.) to count Natural Killer cells in each culture. The test animal serums were compared against a stained and counted control sample comprising cultured human white blood cells and 50 microliters of normal goat serum prepared as outlined previously. Those cultures which exhibited about a 50% increase in the number of Natural Killer cells, as compared with the control, were considered positives for the biologic of the invention. In this specific test three of the five goat serum samples gave positive results; one sample gave about a 50% increase, whereas the other two samples gave an increase on the order of 125%. The above described in vitro determination assay is used throughout the purification and isolation protocol in order to identify which of the separated fractions in each instance contained the desired biologic. The three positive serum samples were each further treated as described below (the procedure for only a single serum sample is set forth, but the method of treating all the samples was the same). In this example, the respective positive serum samples were treated separately; however, such samples could be pooled if desired. Ammonium Sulfate Fractionation Reagents Employed: Ammonium Sulfate (Sigma S-5182, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Missouri) .01m Sodium Phosphate (ph 7.6) Procedure: 1. 24.3 g of ammonium sulfate was weighed out for each 100 ml of serum to be fractionated. 2. The serum sample was placed in a beaker and stirred. During stirring small amounts of ammonium sulfate were added, making sure that all was dissolved before adding more ammonium sulfate; this procedure was continued until the entire amount of ammonium sulfate was added to the sample. The sample was then stirred gently for another 30 minutes. 3. The serum sample was then placed in a centrifuge tube and spun at 10,000 rpm for 30 minutes, whereupon supernatant was carefully removed from the pellet. The supernatant serum fraction was tested for the presence of the desired biologic using the in vitro cell culture assay descirbed above under "Biologic Determination" and was found to be negative; this supernatant was therefore discarded. 4. The centrifuged pellet from step 3 was then redissolved in .01M sodium phosphate (pH 7.6), with the final volume of redissolved pellet being the same amount as that of original serum volume. 5. Steps 2 and 3 were then repeated for the serum sample, in order to effect another separation; again, the in vitro determination assay confirmed that the supernatant did not contain the desired biologic. 6. The pellet was then redissolved to one-half of the original serum volume, using .01 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.6). 7. The resuspended material sample was then placed into a section of 12,000 mw cut-off dialysis tubing. 8. The sample was then dialyzed for 24 hours against .01 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.6), using three changes of 4 liters each in the dialysis. 9. The sample was then removed from the dialysis tubing and put into a centrifuge tube. 10. The tube was next spun at 10,000 rpm for 30 minutes. 11. The supernatant from the centrifuge tube was then removed and the volume measured and recorded; another in vitro determination assay as described above was performed on the supernatant, to confirm that it did contain the desired biologic. 12. The absorbance at 280 nm for the supernatant was taken and recorded. 13. The supernatant material resulting from the fractionation of the sample was stored in a sterile bottle. First Stage Chromatography (using DE-52® anion exchange resin, Whatman, Inc., Clifton, N. J.) 1. An appropriate quantity of DE-52 resin was swelled and equilibrated in .01 molar Sodium Phosphate, pH 7.6. 2. A column (4.4 cm x 83 cm) was packed with swelled DE-52 resin. The column was washed with 2 liters of .01 M NaH₂PO₄ (pH 7.6) at 75 cm pressure. 3. 40 ml of the ammonium sulfate fractionated serum from the sample were loaded onto the DE-52® column at the same pressure as the wash. The material was then eluted from the column with .01 M NaH₂PO₄ (pH 7.6) wash. 4. Liquid from the column was collected in separate tubes (150 drops/tube-- approximately 5.0 ml) until all protein fractions were completely eluted. About 1.0 liter of .01 molar NaH₂PO₄ was passed through the column. 5. The column was then washed with 1.5 liters of .01 molar NaH₂PO₄ containing .5 m NaCl (pH 7.6) to remove bound material from the column. Liquid from the columns was collected in separate tubes (150 drops/tube) until the buffer was expended. 6. The absorbance at 280 nm was taken for all tubes collected. A plot of absorbance (A²⁸⁰) vs. tube number was prepared to locate the peaks. This graph is reproduced as Fig. 1. 7. The material within the tubes located in each separate peak off the plot were then pooled and assayed using the described in vitro determination assay. 8. The pooled material from the first peak (peak A of Fig. 1) was found to contain the biologic of the invention. This material was concentrated by placing the material into a section of dialysis tubing and tying off the ends; the tubing was then placed into a tub of polyethylene glycol (20,000 mw, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Missouri) and concentrated to about 10% of the original pooled volume. The tubing was then rinsed well with water. 9. The pooled material within the tubing was then dialyzed for 24 hours against 0.01 M KH₂PO₄ pH 6.8. Three changes for 4 liters were used to remove polyethylene glycol and salt. 10. The dialyzed material was then removed from tubing and the volume measured. Absorbance readings at 280 nm were taken and recorded along with volume. Second Stage Chromatography (using S-Sepharose® cation exchange chromatography resin Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Missouri) 1. A column (1.0 x 90 cm) was packed with S-Sepharose® resin and then equilibrated with 2 liters of 0.01 M KH₂PO₄ pH 6.8 at flow rate of 0.1 ml/minute. 2. One (1) ml of the pooled and dialyzed material from the first concentrated peak (peak A, Fig. 1), from the DE-52 column was loaded onto the S-Sepharose columns. The column was then developed with a linear gradient of sodium chloride 0 to 0.5 M in 0.01 M KH₂PO₄ pH 6.8. The flow rate was maintained at 0.1 ml with a high pressure liquid chromatograph pump. The gradient was developed over six hundred minutes. 3. Sixty drop fractions were collected (approximately 1.5 ml) in separate tubes. The absorbance at 280 nm was read on a Varian DMS90 for each fraction. A plot of A²⁸⁰ vs. fraction number was prepared; this plot is reproduced as Figure 2. 4. The material within the tubes located in each peak were pooled and concentrated with the polyethylene glycol protocol as set forth in steps 7 and 8 of the first stage chromatography procedure. The material present in each fraction was then tested for stimulatory activity using the in vitro determination assay. 5. The pooled material from the largest peak (peak B, Fig. 2) was found to contain the biologic. This material was then dialyzed for 24 hours using dialysis tubing against 3 changes of 4 liters of PBS (0.01 M K₂HPO₄ containing 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.5). 6. The dialyzed material was then removed from the tubing and the volume measured and recorded. An absorbance (A²⁸⁰) was then taken on the dialyzed material, and the reading recorded. Third Stage Gel Chromatography (using CM Blue AFFI gel cation exchange resin, Bio-Rad Corp., Richmond, California) 1. A column (1.5 cm x 38 cm) was packed and equilibrated with the CM Blue AFFI gel, and the column was washed with 2 liters of .01 M K₂HPO₄ containing .15 M NaCl, pH 7.25, at 45 cm pressure. 2. Two milligrams of material in 1 ml of liquid from the largest peak off the S-Sepharose® column (peak B, Fig. 2) was then loaded onto the column. 3. The column was then developed with .01 M K₂HPO₄ containing .15 M NaCl (pH 7.25) until all peaks were eluted, using approximately 150-200 ml PBS for the column. Liquid off the column was collected in 90 drops fractions, about 2 ml in separate tubes. 4. The column was again washed with 200 ml of .01 M K₂HPO₄ containing .5 m NaCl (pH 7.25 to further elute the bound material; liquid from the column was collected in 90 drops fractions in separate tubes. 5. Absorbance readings at 280 nm were taken for all tubes and a plot of A²⁸⁰ vs tube number from both elutions was prepared; this plot is reproduced as Fig. 3. Material within each peak was pooled, and these were assayed using the in vitro determination assay. 6. Material from the first peak (peak C, Fig. 3) was found to contain most of the biologic; this material was concentrated with polyethylene glycol as described above in the first stage chromatography procedure. 7. The concentrated material was dialyzed for 24 hours against PBS, using three changes of 4 liters each. 8. The material was next removed from dialysis tubing. Absorbance at 280 nm was read and recorded. 9. The material was filtered using a 0.2 µm filter and stored. As is evident from the foregoing, after a determination is made for the positive serum samples (i.e., those containing adequate amounts of biologic) successive fractionation and separation techniques may be employed to obtain the relatively purified biologic material, with appropriate assays being performed on separated fractions in order to ensure that the biologic is retained throughout. The final biologic product comprises proteinaceous component(s) which have not to date been completely characterized. However, the product is presently believed to be an interleukin protein or proteins having an apparent molecular weight in the range of 100,000 to 120,00 daltons; the components also appear to be glycosylated. A sample of the purified biologic made in accordance with the present invention has been deposited with the American Type Culture Collection; such sample has been accorded accession number 40105. Obviously, however, there is no desire to be bound to any preliminary or partial characterizations, and such are offered only in an effort to disclose all presently available pertinent information. While the above described separation and isolation procedures are in many cases preferred, it should be understood that the biologic product derived from the methods of the invention may be usable without all of the aforementioned purification procedures. EXAMPLE II Antiviral Activity Against Human Immundeficiency Virus This example demonstrates that the biologic of the invention exhibits significant antiviral activity in vitro against the human immunodeficiency virus. Specifically, an in vitro assay was performed to test the antiviral activity of the immunostimulant as compared with unstimulated control cultures. In the test, ATH8 cells were used as targets for HIV infection. ATH8 cells were first treated with polybrene (a polymer of positively charged residues sold by Sigma Chemical Co. of St. Louis, Missouri) at a level of 2 micrograms per milliliter for 30 minutes at 37°C (5% CO₂-supplemented air atmosphere). The treated cells were then collected by centrifugation and resuspended in freshly harvested and clarified RPMI -1640 medium containing HTLV-III-B virus. After a 60 minute absorption at 37°C, 0.1 ml of the cell suspension (containing 10⁴ cells) was added to duplicate wells of a tissue culture plate. 0.1 milliliters of stimulant diluted with PBS was added to each test well, and 0.1 milliliters of straight PBS dilutant was added to each of the control wells. The stimulant was tested at concentrations of 0.32 and 1.0 micrograms per milliliter. The plate was incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2-supplemented atmosphere. After ten days of incubation, a 15 microliter aliquot was removed from each well, mixed with an equal volume of trypan blue, and the stained cells were examined microscopically for cell number and viability. The numbers were counted in four hemacytometer grids. The data are presented in Table I. ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY AGAINST HTLV-III-B Drug Concentration Number of Viable Cells/ml Mean Percent Viability Mean 0.32 2.3 2.8 2.6 75.0 74.7 74.9 1.0 1.6 1.8 1.7 64.6 65.4 65.0 Cell Control 3.3 3.5 3.4 63.1 83.3 70.7 Virus Control 2.8 3.1 2.5 50.0 29.0 40.3 The mean percent viability was (74.9%) for the stimulated culture compared to 40.3% for the virus control. EXAMPLE III Viability of HIV-Infected Cells Over Time A virus that is not completely killed or removed from culture may subsequently infect other cells. To test if the percent viability for ATH8 cells infected with HTLV-III-B was different at various times after exposure, a second test was run for seven days. The exposure and culture conditions were identical to Example II except concentration of 0.1, 0.32, 1.0, 3.2, 10, 32, and 100 micrograms/ml were tested with the incubation period shortened to seven days post-infection. The results for triplicate assays are presented in Table II. CONCENTRATION PERCENT VIABILITY 100 5 32 11 10 13.5 3.2 12 1 15.5 0.32 16.5 0.1 21.5 Uninfected cell control 49 Virus Infected control 14.25 The data demonstrate that the immunostimultant hereof is effective at very low concentrations. It is noted that the 0.1 micrograms/ml culture (21.5%) contained fifty percent more viable cells than the virus control. The data also suggest that lower concentrations work best when tested against HTLV-III-B infected ATH8 cells. EXAMPLE IV In vitro Test of Mixed Lymphocytes From An AIDS Patient Blood cells from an AIDS donor were first separated using Histopaque (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Missouri) to obtain monocytes and lymphocytes. The latter where cultured in the presence of the immunostimulant at 1 mg/ml. Matching controls were cultured without the stimulant. At the time the cells were obtained, the helper to suppressor ratio was 0.6 with 27% CD4L and 43% CD8. The cultured cells were collected by centrifugation and aliquots stained with FITC-Anti T8 (CD8), phycocrythrin anti T4 (CD4), FITC-Anti NK (CD16), FITC-Anti T-11 (CD1), and FITC-Anti B. The data are presented in Table III. Helpers CD4 Supp. CD8 T Cells NK B Control 7.5 15 46 8.5 5 11.9 15 47 9.1 3 13.0 18 44 12.0 5 11.0 15 48 8.0 2 10.0 18 45 9.0 4 Stimulated 16 12.6 49 10 3 13 11 45 11 5 13 15 54 16 5 15 10.9 46 15 3 14 16.0 48 15 3 Avg Control 10.7 16.2 46 9.3 3.8 Avg Test 14.2 13.1 48.5 13.4 3.8 The results show that the number of NK (CD16) and helper/inducer (CD4) cells were increased in the stimulated culture when compared to the controls. Another important finding is the decrease in the number of suppressor (CD8) cells. EXAMPLE V Comparison of the Effect of Interleukin-2 and Immunostimulant Biologic on Lymphocytes from an AIDS Patient Histopaque-separated monocytes isolated from the whole blood of an AIDS patient were cultured in RPMI -1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum at 37°C. The cells were cultured at a density of 2x10⁵ per 200 microliters (10⁶ cells/ml) for five days in air enriched with 5% CO². The interleukin-2 is commerically available from Collaborative Research, Inc. of Lexington, Mass. (Polyclone) and each culture contained 2.5 units of interleukin-2 per milliliter. The biologic was present in each culture at 50 micrograms per milliliter. Control cultures were run in parallel with the test cultures under identical conditions. All test cultures were then collected and stained with fluorescent-labeled antibodies specific for helper/inducer (CD4), suppressor (CD8), or Natural Killer (CD16) cells. The cells were stained as recommended by the manufacturer of the monoclonal antibodies (Becton Dickinson). The cultures were run and counted in triplicate using an Ortho Model 50H Research Cytofluorograph 2150 computer. The data from these tests are presented in the following table. The Effect of Interleukin-2 or Immunostimulant Biologic on Human Mononuclear Cells From an AIDS Patient CD4 CD8 CD16 Control 37 24 14 33 27 11 34 26 12 Interleukin-2 40 24 15 39 24 15 -- -- 17 Biologic 44 24 18 43 25 18 42 25 19 Both biologics, IL-2 and immunostimulant cause an increase in CD4 and CD16. No statistically significant changes were noted in the CD8 populations. When IL-2 and IMC are co-culture there is no synergy noted. The number of CD4 and CD8 cells decrease demonstrating antagonistic effect for the two stimulants. This supports the hypothesis that the two stimulants work via different receptors and possibly via a different mechanism.

Claims: Use of the immunostimulating biologic identified and designated by ATCC Accession No. 40105 for the preparation of a medicament for in vivo inhibiting and replication of human immunodeficiency virus in the presence of white blood cells in cells infected with said virus. Use according to claim 1 for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of humans. Use of the immunostimulating biologic identified and designated by ATCC accession number 40105 for inhibiting the replication of human immunodeficiency virus by in vitro contacting cells infected with said virus with said biologic in the presence of white blood cells.

Inventors: STOUT, ROBERT, L.
Applicants: CLINICAL BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Application year: 1988
Main classification: A61K45
IPC codes: C07K16, C07K14, A61K39, A61K38