The treatment of mercurial waste

Abstract: A method for separating mercurial waste from scrapped gas discharge lamp bulbs and other mercury-containing lamps. Expended, broken lamps are crushed in a crusher (11) and conveyed to a vibrating screen (13). The crushed material is shaken on a sieve-cloth (14) having a mesh width of 0.2-1.0 mm, preferably 0.25 mm, for at least 1-3 minutes. The major part of the crushed material remains on the screen and is removed therefrom as mercury-free waste (Hg-content < 10 ppm), whereas substantially all the mer­ cury present is found in the finer fraction which passes through the screen.

Description: The present invention relates to a method for separating mercurial waste from rejected mercury vapour discharge lamps and other lamps that contain mercury. Mercury is a necessary constituent of a number of gas discharge lamps and also of many other kinds of lamps. A common feature of such lamps is that they have an intemal pressure which is sufficiently low to convert the mercury to vapour form. Should the glass tube or envelope of such lamps fracture, the mercury will condense rapidly onto the glass, and more specifically onto the luminescent powder with which such lamps are normally coated. A certain amount of mercury will also precipitate onto the socket connection and lamp cathodes, etc. Since mercury is one of the most serious environmental poisons, it is necessary to process and handle lamps which contain mercury in a manner which will ensure that the mercury does not spread to the surroundings. The method most commonly practiced in this regard is still one in which the waste is deposited in a controlled form in separate organized collecting stations. One method used to recover mercury from mercurial lamp waste comprises the steps of crushing the lamps and distilling off the mercury. The treatment is carried out batchwise in impervious, sealed containers, to which gaseous nitrogen is supplied and which are heated and placed under a vacuum, wherewith the mercury present is converted to vapour form and departs through a bottom outlet and condenses in a cooling trap. This method is described and illustrated in U.S. Patent Specification Ser. No. 4268306. However, although the mercury is separated from the scrap very effectively by means of this method, the process involved is slow, taking about 9 hours to complete with each batch of 120 litres, which renders the method expensive and therewith prohibits its introduction into all destruction plants or in other establishments which have a requirement to treat or to process scrapped mercury gas discharge lamps and lamps of other kinds. One method of reducing the cost of treatment in the distillation chamber and of rendering destruction more positive, is to divide the waste into separate batches of mutually different mercury content. One such method is described in U.S. Patent Specification Ser. No. 4715838 and comprises the steps of removing the mercury-contaminated luminescent powder from the actual glass bulb or tube of the lamp. This reduces the mercury content of the tube to a level which enables it to be treated as standard glass scrap. The luminescent powder removed may then either be dumped, cleansed or re-used. This latter method has been found very effective, particularly in the case of gas discharge lamp factories in which the scrapped discharge bulbs or tubes are always whole and clean. The method, however, cannot be used to the same high level of efficiency when the bulbs involved are dirty and broken. Furthermore, the use of mercury in lamps other than the traditional glass-tube lamp is progressively increasing. In JP-A-5233387 there is disclosed a method of collecting mercury from used and waste fluorescent tubes by crushing of such fluorescent tubes, and dry separation of the mercury containing fluorescent substance or powder from the pieces of glass. Although this Japanese document describes and illustrates in broad outline a method and apparatus for carrying out the desired separation, it contains no details of the particle size to which the fluorescent tubes are crushed, or any identification of the means of separation. Thus, this prior art does not give a reader any clear indication of how the essential separation step is to be performed, and there is no description of any actual apparatus for performing the process. The object of the present invention is therefore to provide a method for reducing that part of lamp waste which must be stored under controlled forms, or which must be further cleansed, and also to provide a method which can be applied to all kinds or mercurial lamps, irrespective of whether the lamps are whole, broken, clean or dirty. Further objects of the invention and advantages afforded thereby will be evident from the following description, and are realized by means of the method defined in the following claims. The invention will now be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying schematic drawing, the single Figure of which is a side view of a plant for separating mercurial waste in accordance with the present invention. The illustrated plant comprises a crusher 11 which is capable of grinding or crushing the lamps to a glass debris having a maximum partide size of 1-2 cm, preferably 1.5 cm. The arrangement should be completely closed, since mercury vapour is released when crushing the lamps. The crushed material is conveyed with the aid of suitable apparatus 12 to a vibratory screen 13, which in the illustrated embodiment has the form of a screening table provided with a sieve-cloth 14. The sieve-cloth 14 preferably has a mesh width smaller than 1 mm, suitably within the range 0.2-0.3 mm. A particularly suitable mesh width is 0.25 mm, at which approximately 5 % by weight of the material will pass through the sieve-cloth while 95 % by weight will remain on the upper surface of the table and be vibrated down into a collecting hopper 15, from where it is charged into a dumping vessel 16. The finer fraction falls into a tray 17 located beneath the sieve or screen, and is collected in a suitable vessel 18. Tests have been carried out in which 1 kg of tube waste was divided up into the following fractions, which were then analysed with regard to their mercury contents. Fraction Total weight (g) Weight Hgµg (ppm) > 2 mm 587.5 469.5 0.79 2-1 mm 204.9 244.8 1.19 1-0.5 mm 125.0 150.5 1.20 0.5-0.25 mm 49.4 148.5 3.01 0.25-0.125 mm 18.7 28 731.9 1536.5 0.125-0.063 mm 7.6 48 796.2 6420.5 < 0.063 mm 7.0 7 022.5 1003.2 1000.1 g 85 563.9 µg It will be seen from the table that there is a very pronounced increase in the mercury content of the fractions whose particle sizes lay beneath about 0.25 mm. This is because the major part of the mercury is present in the luminescent powder, the major part of which is shaken loose from the broken glass during the vibratory screening process. In order for the luminescent powder to be shaken loose in the manner intended, the crushed material is preferably held on the sieve-cloth for at least 1-3 minutes, preferably at least 2 minutes. It is assumed here that screening of the material is effected in a conventional manner, e.g. on a conventional gravel sieve. A normal limit for the definition of mercurial waste is that the waste shall contain more than 10 ppm mercury. If the mercury content is less than 10 ppm, the material is considered to be free of mercury. It will be seen from the table that by using a mesh size of 2 mm, the major part of the material can be sorted and treated as mercury-free material. However, to minimize the amount of waste which requires further treatment in a particular manner, there is preferably selected a mesh size of about 0.25 mm, therewith enabling about 95 % of the crushed material to be sorted out, and solely about 5 % subjected to further treatment. In addition to mercury, lamp waste may also contain harmful quantities of cadmium and antimony. However, when practicing the method according to the invention these substances will also be concentrated to the finer fractions. Thus, both the cadmium content and the antimony content will lie beneath 10 ppm in the mercury-free material sorted in accordance with the aforesaid definition. The finer mercurial material is preferably treated in a mercury distiller in a manner to recover pure mercury, the residue material being dumped or stored under controlled forms should the content of other poisons be excessively large. It will be understood that the invention is not restricted to the described and illustrated embodiment thereof, and that modifications can be made within the scope of the following claims. For example, the mesh sizes may be varied in a manner to afford suitably separation of mercury when treating lamp waste of mutually different mercury content.

Claims: A method for separating mercurial waste from scrapped gas discharge lamps and other mercury-containing lamps of the type which are coated with luminescent powder on their inside glass surfaces consisting of the steps of crushing the lamps and separating the luminescent powder from the glass by shaking the crushed lamp residues on a vibratory screen (13) over a minimim time of at least 1 minute and at a mesh width of 0.2-1 mm at which the lamp residues is divided into a coarse, first fraction, essentially free from mercury and a finer, second fraction contianing essentially all the mercury present. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that the mesh width is 0.2-0.3 mm, preferably 0.25 mm. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the crushed lamp residues are vibrated for a minimum period of from 1-3 minutes, preferably about 2 minutes. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized by crushing the lamp glass to slivers having a maximum size of about 3 cm, preferably 1-2 cm. A method according to claim 4, characterized in that the crushing arrangement is completely closed to prevent release of mercury vapour. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized by treating the separated second fraction in a mercury distiller in a manner to recover pure mercury.

Inventors: KULANDER HANS, KULANDER, HANS
Applicants: MRT SYSTEM AB, MRT SYSTEM AKTIEBOLAG
Application year: 1988
Main classification: C22B43
IPC codes: B03B9, C22B43, H01J9, C22B7