LAMINATED POLES FOR RECORDING HEADS

Abstract: The pole includes at least two ferromagnetic layers (22, 24) having different uniaxial anisotropies and a nonmagnetic layer (26) disposed between the ferromagnetic layers. The nonmagnetic layer inhibits exchange coupling between the magnetic layers so as to eliminate edge domains. Magnetic flux is conducted by rotation which can occur at high frequencies and which does not generate any magnetic noise. If the nonmagnetic layer is an electrical insulator, eddy currents are also suppressed. Embodiments are disclosed in which the nonmagnetic layer completely separates and partially separates the ferromagnetic layers.

Description: LAMINATED POLES FOR RECORDING HEADS Background of the Invention This invention relates to poles for thin film recording heads. As the track density is increased in magnetic recording, it is necessary to reduce the track width and the width of the head. Reducing the width of the head results in "edge closure domains" in single layer poles when the pole width is reduced to a critical value where the edge domains dominate. These edge domains can conduct flux only by domain wall motion. This process fails at high frequencies and leads to "Barkhausen noise" at low frequencies. This situation is illustrated in Figs. la-Id. In Fig. la a pole 10 includes horizontally oriented normal domains 12 and edge domains 14. As shown in Fig. lb, flux is conducted by rotation. As the pole width is reduced to a critical value, the edge domains touch as shown in Fig. lc. The magnetic permeability becomes low at high frequencies and flux is conducted by wall motion. As shown in Fig. Id, Barkhausen noise is created when a wall 16 encounters a defect 18 and becomes temporarily stuck. In addition to the single layer poles illustrated in Figs. la-Id, laminated ferromagnetic structures are known. Those structures related to narrow track applications usually involve relatively thick insulators (e.g. 200 Angstroms) alternating with a large number of thin (700 Angstroms) ferromagnetic films. A structure including two ferromagnetic layers separated by a very thin (less than 100 Angstrom) layer of nonmagnetic material is disclosed in "Coercivity, Structure, and Stoichiometry of Permalloy/Alumina Multilayers" by N.J. Jubb et al. presented at the 1984 M.M.M. Conference, and "Sensitivity of Single Sided. Single Pole Type Perpendicular Magnetic Head" by Iaso atanabe et al. in Research Inst. of Ele. Eng. , Tohoko University. The Watanabe paper discusses narrow tracks for high frequency operation. In "Reproducing Sensitivity of Single-Pole-Type Head with Co-Zr-Nb/Si0 2 Multilayered Films" by S. Iwasaki, Y. Nakamura, I. Watanabe, K. Wamakawa, H. Hasegawa, IEEE Translation Journal on Magnetics in Japan, Vol. TJMJ-2, No. 5, May 1987, p. 386, heads are disclosed including ferromagnetic layers separated by a nonmagnetic layer. The ferromagnetic layers were of the same material and had equivalent uniaxial anisotropy. Summary of the Invention The pole according to one aspect of the invention includes at least two ferromagnetic layers having different uniaxial anisotropies and a nonmagnetic layer disposed between the ferromagnetic layers. In one embodiment, the nonmagnetic layer completely separates the ferromagnetic layers. In another embodiment, the nonmagnetic layer partially separates the ferromagnetic layers. It is preferred that the nonmagnetic layer be an electrical insulator for the first embodiment. When the nonmagnetic layer completely separates the two ferromagnetic layers, the thickness of the nonmagnetic layer G satisfies the inequality G<2Hk(W-T)/Ms where G is the nonmagnetic layer thickness; W is the width of the structure (track width); T is the thickness of each ferromagnetic layer; Hk is the average uniaxial anisotropy field of the ferromagnetic layers; and Ms is the saturation magnetization of the ferromagnetic layers. It is preferred that the ferromagnetic layers include differing compositions of NiFeCo and that the nonmagnetic layer be of A1 2 0_ or any other electrical insulator. In another aspect of the invention the pole includes a thick unlaminated layer of a ferromagnetic material separated from a laminated seed layer. Brief Description of the Drawing Figs. la-Id are schematic illustrations of single layer poles; Fig. 2 is a perspective view of a laminated pole including two ferromagnetic layers separated by a nonmagnetic layer; Fig. 3 is a perspective view of a pole having multiple laminations; Fig. 4 is a perspective view of a pole including a nonmagnetic layer which partially separates the ferromagnetic layers; Figs. 5a-5c are schematic illustrations showing the process for making the pole of Fig. 4; and Fig. 6 is a perspective view of a thick pole disposed on a laminated seed layer. Description of the Preferred Embodiments The theory on which the present invention is based will now be discussed in conjunction with Fig. 2. A laminated pole structure 20 includes a first ferromagnetic layer 22 and a second ferromagnetic layer 24 separated by a thin nonmagnetic layer 26. The nonmagnetic layer 26 inhibits "exchange coupling" between the ferromagnetic layers 22 and 24. This allows flux circulation between the two layers to eliminate edge domains. The nonmagnetic layer 26 is thick enough to stop the exchange coupling top to bottom, but thin enough to conduct flux without requiring too much magnetostatic energy. In the structure of Fig. 2, edge domains such as illustrated by an arrow 28 can :rotate to. conduct flux while a domain wall 30 never moves. Central domains can also rotate as shown by an arrow 32. The ferromagnetic layers 22 and 24 have an induced uniaxial anisotropy whose easy axis is shown by an arrow 34. The anisotropy is induced by an external magnetic field during the deposition process which creates the layers 22 and 24. Flux is conducted by rotation which can occur at high frequencies and does not generate any magnetic noise. If the nonmagnetic layer 26 is also an electrical insulator, there is the added advantage of suppression of eddy currents. The applicant herein has derived an approximate inequality for estimating the acceptable thickness of the nonmagnetic layer 26. The inequality is G<2Hk(W-T)/Ms where the symbols have been defined above. By observing this relationship, good domain structures are obtained _ which can conduct flux in narrow (high track density) poles. A typical thickness for the nonmagnetic layer is 50 Angstroms. This relationship neglects wall energy and assumes the domain pattern shown in Fig. 2. For very thin laminates (T<0.5 microns) the actual pattern will distribute the closure flux more widely over the gap so that the above equation will underestimate the acceptable thickness G. The magnetic layers 22 and 24 of Fig. 2 may be made either by sputtering or plating. Sputtering is used for the nonmagnetic layer 26 when it is an electrical insulator. Generally, an electrically conductive material will not adequately stop exchange coupling between the magnetic layers for acceptable values of G. After the layers are deposited, the structure is ion milled to desired dimensions. Suitable materials for the ferromagnetic layers 22 and 24 are NiFeCo with varying amounts of Co in the two layers to generate the different uniaxial anisotropy levels. Thus, the uniaxial anisotropy of one of the magnetic layers is made much stronger than that of the other layer by varying the composition of the material. One layer will thus dominate the system locally and the other layer will automatically fall into a keepering orientation. This master-slave relationship avoids disordered domain structures resulting from the two layers relaxing into the same orientation (parallel instead of the desired antiparallel configuration) after saturation. Suitable materials for the nonmagnetic layers are A1_0_ and SiO-. Yet another embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig. 3. A pole structure 40 includes multiple layers 42, 44, 46, and 48 of a ferromagnetic material separated by layers 50, 52, and 54 of a nonmagnetic material. The thickness of the nonmagnetic layers 50, 52, and 54 satisfies the equation discussed above in conjunction with Fig. 2 with T equal to the thickness of the top and bottom magnetic layers 42 and 48. The interior ferromagnetic layers 44 and 46 have a thickness of 2T. As in the embodiment of Fig. 2, the pole 40 conducts magnetic flux by rotation; the domain walls never move. The pole 40 is fabricated using the same fabrication procedure as utilized to create the bi-layer structure of Fig. 2. The number of layers shown in Fig. 3 is entirely exemplary and it should be understood that more or fewer layers may be employed. Fig. 4 is an important embodiment of the present invention. A pole 60 includes a nonmagnetic layer 62 which is completely surrounded by a ferromagnetic material 64. As will be shown below in conjunction with Fig. 5, the material 64 may in fact be a composite of different materials having different uniaxial anisotropies. The thickness of the nonmagnetic layer 62 is not constrained by the inequality discussed in conjunction with Fig. 2 since there is no nonmagnetic material where the flux closes between the two layers. The configuration of the pole 60, however, will not inhibit eddy currents as in the earlier embodiments. To produce the pole 60 by ion milling, it is necessary to pattern the nonmagnetic layer 62 before a second magnetic layer is deposited. A through mask plating approach is available, however, which can produce a suitable structure with process efficiency. This process will now be described in conjunction with Fig. 5. With reference first to Fig. 5a, a 2,000 Angstrom thick NiFeCo plating base 70 resides on a ceramic base 72. A photoresist mask 74, appropriately patterned, is deposited on the plating base layer 70. A o first ferromagnetic layer 76 of NiFeCo is plated through the mask. A nonmagnetic layer 78 is plated through the same mask with extra thickness to allow for seed layer etching. A suitable material for the layer 78 is NiP having an initial thickness of 2500 5 Angstroms. Next, the edge zones of the mask 74 are removed and the nonmagnetic layer 78 is sputter etched to have a thickness of approximately 500 Angstroms. This sputter etching will also remove the seed layer in the regions indicated at 80. Additional magnetic 0 material is then plated to create a layer 82 of NiFeCo which may have a different cobalt content from the layer 76. The completed pole is shown in Fig. 5c. The plating of the magnetic layer 82 is completed and the mask 74 is removed. The seed layer 70 of Fig. 5a is - 7 - also removed by sputter etching to leave the completed pole. It should be noted that the magnetic layers 76 and 82 are plated in the presence of a bias magnetic field for inducing the uniaxial anisotropy. Still another embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig. 6. A pole 90 is a thick unla inated pole on a thin laminated seed layer. A laminated seed layer is used to conduct flux by rotation during readback while a thick unlaminated layer conducts flux by rotation or wall motion during write. During readback the thick layer can transmit flux to the thin layer by rotation even when its domain structure is unfavorable for carrying the flux to the yoke by itself. The pole 90 of Fig. 6 is made in the following way. A first ferromagnetic layer 92 is sheet deposited. A thin layer 94 of a nonmagnetic material such A1 2 0, is sputtered onto the layer 92. The thin layer 94 has a thickness determined by the inequality set forth in conjunction with Fig. 2 above. A second ferromagnetic layer 96 is next deposited. A second nonmagnetic layer 98 which is much thicker than the layer 94 is deposited on the layer 96. A suitable thickness for the layer 98 is approximately 1,000 Angstroms and will provide decoupling to the overlying layers so that stray fields from them do not adversely affect the laminated layers. A third magnetic layer 100 is plated on the layer 98 to serve as a plating base. Finally, one patterns and through mask plates a thick magnetic layer 102 having a thickness of approximately 20,000 Angstroms. The plated thick layer 102 serves as a mask to ion mill its pattern into the underlying laminated structure. The pole structures disclosed herein generate domain structures that conduct flux by rotation. These structures give good high frequency response and avoid Barkhausen noise. As track widths are narrowed in order to record at high track density, it becomes more and more difficult to achieve good domain structures. If nonlaminated, high anisotropy materials are used for high density applications, the permeability of the pole is reduced with a corresponding loss of flux utilization efficiency. The pole structures of the present invention overcome this limitation. An additional benefit of lamination is the suppression of eddy currents for even better high frequency response when the nonmagnetic layer is also an electrical insulator. It is recognized that modifications and variations of the pole structures disclosed herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all such modifications and variations be included within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims: Claims 1. A laminated pole for a recording head comprising: at least two ferromagnetic layers having different uniaxial anisotropies; and a nonmagnetic layer disposed between the ferromagnetic layers. 2. The pole of claim 1 wherein the nonmagnetic layer completely separates the ferromagnetic layers. 3. A laminated pole for a recording head comprising: two ferromagnetic layers; and a nonmagnetic layer partially separating the ferromagnetic layers. 4. The pole of claim 2 including more than two ferromagnetic layers, the interior layers having a thickness 2T and the top and bottom layers having a thickness T. 5. A laminated pole for a recording head comprising: at least two thin ferromagnetic layers with a nonmagnetic layer disposed between the ferromagnetic layers and including a thick unlaminated layer of a ferromagnetic material separated from one of the thin ferromagnetic layers by a non-magnetic layer. 6. The pole of claim 2 wherein the thickness of the nonmagnetic layer G satisfies the inequality G<2Hk(W-T)/Ms. 7. The pole of claim 1 wherein the ferromagnetic layers comprise NiFeCo. 8. The pole of claim 1 wherein the nonmagnetic layer is NiP. 9. The pole of claim l wherein the nonmagnetic layer is A1 2 0_ . 10. The pole of claim 1 wherein the nonmagnetic layer is approximately 50 Angstroms. 11. The pole of claim 2 wherein the thickness . of the nonmagnetic layer is approximately 50 Angstroms. 12. The pole of claim 3 wherein the nonmagnetic layer thickness is approximately 500 Angstroms. 13. The pole of claim 5 wherein the thick unlaminated layer thickness is substantially larger than that of the laminated layers. 14. The pole of claim 3 wherein the uniaxial anisotropies of the two ferromagnetic layers are substantially equal. 15. The pole of claim 3 wherein the uniaxial anisotropies of the two ferromagnetic layers are different. 16. The pole of claim 5 wherein the uniaxial anisotropies of the ferromagnetic layers are substantially equal. 17. The pole of claim 5 wherein the uniaxial anisotropies of the ferromagnetic layers are different. 18. The pole of claim 1 wherein the thickness of said nonmagnetic layer G satisfies the inequality G<2Hk(W-t)/Ms. 19. The pole of claim 5 wherein at least one of the nonmagnetic layers G satisfies the inequality G<2Hk(W-T)/Ms.

Inventors: MALLORY MICHAEL L, MALLORY, MICHAEL, L.
Applicants: DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP, DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
Application year: 1988
Main classification: G11B5
IPC codes: G11B5