ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE PRODUCTION

Abstract: A method for the production of aluminum hydroxide, including reacting water in the liquid phase and aluminum at a pH above about 12.4. In this pH range, aluminum hydroxide is produced at acceptable rates both for aluminum surfaces areas above 75,000 mm<2>/g and for aluminum surface area of less than about 50,000 mm<2> per gram, and even down to 20 mm<2> per gram. According to an alternative view of the invention, it is characterized by the production of aluminum hydroxide by reacting aluminum with liquid water containing choline. Aluminum hydroxide particles having unique morphologies are obtained.

Description: ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE PRODUCTION Background of the Invention This invention relates to the production of aluminum trihydroxide. U.S. Patent No. 3,494,733 of Keith and Comely, issued February 10, 1970, for "Method for the Production of Alumina Trihydrate Dominant in Bayerite" emphasizes a "discovery that aluminum metal of high surface area and in a very fine state of subdivision, can be reacted with water at a basic pH to yield a predominantly trihydrate alumina without the need for extensive aging." As to the high surface area and very fine state of subdivision, Keith and Comely state that the aluminum particles used in their process should have surface area lying in the range 75 thousand to 1 million square millimeters/gram. Others have experimented with the reaction of aluminum metal with high pressure steam. See Tremper and Gordon, "Agglomeration Effects on the Sintering of Alumina Powders Prepared by Autoclaving Aluminum Metal" in "Ceramic Processing Before Firing", Onoda and Hench, pp. 153-76, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y. (1978) . Summary of the Invention It is an object of the invention to provide a method for the production of aluminum hydroxide overcoming certain disadvantages of the process of Keith and Comely. This as well as other objects which will become apparent in the discussion that follows are achieved, according to the present invention, by providing a method for the production of aluminum hydroxide, including reacting water in the liquid phase and aluminum at a pH above about 12.4. In this pH range, aluminum hydroxide is produced at acceptable rates both for aluminum surface areas within the range required by Keith and Comely and for aluminum surface area of less than about 50,000 mm 2 per gram, and even down to 34, or even 20, mm 2 per gram. According to an alternative view of the invention, it is characterized by the production of aluminum hydroxide by reacting aluminum with liquid water containing choline. Nomenclature as used herein for aluminum hydroxides is according to Figure 1 in the article entitled "Aluminum Oxide" in the 5th edition of Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. The term "trihydrate alumina" as used by Keith and Comely is aluminum trihydroxide in the system of Ullmann's Figure 1. Unless noted otherwise, percentages herein are percentages by weight. Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 depicts the structural formula of tetramethylammonium hydroxide. Figure 2 depicts the structural formula of choline. Figures 3, 4 and 5 are 5000x scanning electron micrographs of aluminum hydroxide particles of the present invention. Description of the Preferred Embodiments In the present invention, aluminum hydroxide is produced, as in Keith and Comely, by the reaction of water with aluminum metal. An attraction of producing aluminum hydroxide in this way lies in the fact that aluminum metal of very high purity is available in the marketplace at reasonable prices as compared to the cost of obtaining similar purity aluminum hydroxide by direct production from bauxite. The process of Keith and Comely is, however, disadvantageous from a number of points of view - for instance from the point of view of product contamination when one uses one of their suggested materials containing sodium or chlorine, for example, or from the point of view of ability to react the aluminum, particularly aluminum of larger particle, or piece, size. Keith and Comely teach in their above-cited 3,494,733 that the aluminum metal must have high surface area and a very fine state of subdivision; it should have surface area lying in the range 75 thousand to 1 million square millimeters per gram. The difficulty in obtaining reaction is treated in another U.S. patent of Keith and Comely, namely U.S. Patent No. 3,.488,147. These disadvantages of the process of Keith and Comely are overcome in the. present invention through the use of choline as an added material and through the use of higher pH - above about 12.4. The closest Keith and Comely come to choline as an added material is tetramethylammonium hydroxide, whose structure is as shown in the Figure 1 attached hereto. This is Keith and Comely ! s example of a lower alkyl amine (claim 7 of 3,494,733). Choline is quite different, because one of the groups ' attached to the quaternary nitrogen is not alkyl but rather -CH 2 CH2-OH. See the structure of choline as presented in the attached Fig. 2. In terms of pH, Keith and Comely recommend a basic pH up to only about 12. Important for the success of additives such as the chemicals suggested by Keith and Comely and the choline used in the present invention is that their alu inates must be soluble. Only then is a cyclic digest possible, wherein the additive is recycles for reuse in the production of more aluminum hydroxide. Formation of insoluble aluminates would make the process uneconomic, by consuming the additive. The presence of the covalently bonded OH at location 5 in Figure 2 would indicate a non-soluble aluminate (the presence of -CH2-CH2-OH would cause the aluminate to be insoluble due to strong interaction between the covalent OH and the Al 3+ ion) , but we have found, to the contrary, that such does not, in fact, occur. Choline concentrations of about 0.05 to 2 mole per liter (M) are effective for promoting the reaction of water and aluminum metal according to the present invention. The range of 0.05 to 1 mol per liter is preferred when ceramic aluminas are the desired end product. Higher choline concentrations yield products having morphologies suitable, for example, for sorbent applications, as discussed below. Concentrations above about 2.0M are not preferred, as decreased reaction rates seem to be found at such concentrations. The lower end of this concentration range causes a pH of about 12.7, and pH rises to above 13 as one exceeds around 0.1 M. In contrast, the pH used in Example IV of Keith and Comely's 3,494,733 (their Example IV is the example where tetramethylammonium hydroxide is used) is 9.5, this indicating a tetramethylammonium hydroxide concentration in the neighborhood of 3.2 x 10~ 5 M. Interestingly, a relationship between choline concentration and the resulting predominant form of aluminum hydroxide has been found, lower concentrations giving bayerite and higher concentrations giving gibbsite. Thus, low concentrations of about 0.05 M choline yields predominantly bayerite, while concentrations of 0.5 M and above yield all gibbsite. This we know to be true between 22 and 75 β C. Gibbsite is desirable for production of ceramic aluminas. The ability to select crystal phase by adjustment of choline concentration gives much more flexibility than in 3,494,733. See particularly the comment in 3,494,733 on temperature influence on phase at its column 4, lines 16-24. Temperature of the aqueous solution used in the invention is preferably kept above about 40°C, in order to prevent scale adhesion on the aluminum metal being reacted. It is advantageous to stir the liquid in the reaction vessel. Stirring provides intimate contact of metal and solution and maintains a homogenous concentration in the solution. The stirring need not be so vigorous as blender, or high shear, mixing. Stirring reduces scale adhesion on the vessel containing the reactants. Stirring also causes autoprecipitation, i.e., precipitation without any need for seeding. While the invention works well for aluminum metal of relatively high surface area, as demonstrated by Examples I to IV below, it is still quite successful with aluminum of lower surface area, even at surface areas of less than 400 mm 2 /g, as demonstrated by the remaining examples. The ability to use coarser aluminum metal is important from a safety point of view, since danger of explosion increases with increasing surface area. The ability to use coarser metal, e.g., less than 400 mm 2 /g, is also important from the point of view of purity of the aluminum hydroxide product; this is true, because the atomization process for making powdered aluminum gives the opportunity for impurities to come into the metal that were not in the aluminum to begin with. Reaction time is in general 4 to 6 hours, with up to two days being required for very coarse metal. The longer reaction times for the coarser metal is not necessarily of disadvantage, since coarser metal is cheaper and batch operation permits one to simply load the reactants into a vessel and permit the reaction to go to completion. Continuous operation is, of course, also possible. As to purity, the purer the aluminum metal, the purer the aluminum hydroxide product. U.S. Patent No. 4,115,215 shows the production of aluminum metal of 99.99% (referred to as "4-9"s") purity, and metal of that purity can be purchased. In fact, 5- and even 6-9's purity aluminum is readily available on the market. A process based on the decomposition of organic compounds containing aluminum is said to yield 7-9's purity aluminum. Besides attention being given to the aluminum metal, impurities can also result from contaminants in the water and the choline. Deionized, or perhaps double-deionized, and distilled water is suitable. Depending on the end use of the aluminum hydroxide, different impurities are of concern to different end uses. Iron and copper impurities in the aluminum are disadvantageous to the invention, because these impurities retard the aluminum-water reaction. The aluminum hydroxide product of the invention will, in general, have an average particle size of at least about 1 micron, preferably about 4 to 12 microns, with higher choline concentrations giving the larger average particle sizes. Aluminum hydroxide produced according to the present invention can be calcined to produce high purity alumina useful, for example, in the manufacture of high intensity sodium vapor discharge lamps. Any remnant choline is driven off or destroyed in the calcination, and other impurity concentrations can be reduced, depending on their vapor pressures or the vapor pressures of their oxides. Other uses for the calcined product of the invention are as polishing compound, in cutting tools, in bioceramics, in electronic substrates, synthetic jewels, watch covers, special windows (such as the window of the bar-code readers of checkout counters) , encapsulating lids of various types, etc. Freedom f rom the alkali metal contamination characterizing aluminas directly made from Bayer process aluminum trihydroxide makes the aluminum hydroxide product of the present invention suitable for preparation of activated (transition) alumina catalyst supports. Naturally, there are a number of areas of application where purity does not have to be greater than 99.5% where the invention can as well be applied. Further illustrative of the invention are the following examples: EXAMPLE I A solution of choline in water was made using Eastman practical grade 45% choline in methanol to yield a solution concentration of 0.05 mols choline per liter of solution. The solution was brought to a temperature of 40°C and stirred using an air stirrer. While maintaining stirring, 40.5 grams of aluminum powder, namely Alcoa High-Purity Atomized Powder Grade 7123 powder (minimum aluminum content of 99.97%) having an average particle size of 17 microns and a surface area of 250,000 mm 2 /gm, first mixed with a small amount of deionized water to guard against dusting, was mixed with the choline solution. The 40.5 grams of aluminum provided a metal concentration of 2 mols per liter of choline solution. The aluminum reacted with the water and hydrogen was evolved. The temperature rose to 81-86°C and was maintained there by cooling water circulated through stainless steel tubing immersed in the solution. The mixture was allowed to react until hydrogen evolution ceased. After another period amounting to about 1/3 the amount of time to cessation of hydrogen evolution, the reaction mixture was filtered using Watmann No. 42 filter paper to collect an aluminum hydroxide product of about 5 to 10 microns particle size. Total reaction time (to hydrogen evolution cessation + 1/3) was 3.83 hours. X-ray diffraction analysis of the product showed a major portion of bayerite with a probable minor portion of boehmite. Table I presents a summary of the experimental conditions used for this example. Table IV presents the types of aluminum hydroxide detected by X-ray diffraction analysis. EXAMPLE II The purpose of this example was to determine the effect of solution metal concentration. Procedure was as in Example I, except that 101.1 grams of aluminum was used, this amounting to a metal concentration of 5 mols per liter of choline solution. Temperature control became more difficult (the larger amount of aluminum resulted in increased heat evolution) , as evidenced by the greater temperature range in Table I. However, the process, as embodied in this Example, is still well within the capabilities of any of a multitude of temperature control techniques familiar to chemical engineers. Aluminum hydroxide types recovered were as presented in Table IV. EXAMPLES III-IV The purpose of these examples was to determine the effect of lower operating temperature. Procedure was as in Examples I and II, except that temperature was controlled to the region around 60". Experimental conditions and results were as displayed in Table I. Aluminum hydroxide types recovered were as presented in Table IV. EXAMPLES V-VII In these examples, a granular aluminum metal of lower surface area was used to provide an idea of the effect of surface area, by comparison with Examples I-IV. The metal measured 99.7% Al in purity. Choline concentration was also varied, to develop an indication of its effect on reaction time. Procedure was as in Example I, with parameter and result differences as noted in Table II. In Examples V and VI, 61 grams of aluminum were charged, and the experiments were stopped before complete reaction. In Example VII, all of the aluminum charged was reacted. Aluminum hydroxide types recovered were as presented in Table V. EXAMPLE VIII In this example, aluminum flake (or, perhaps more correctly stated, pebbles) of 99.99% purity and still lower surface area was used. The pebbles are a product of Aluminum Company of America bearing the designation "Alcoa Granulated Ingot", Product Code No. 1301. In this case, unlike Examples I-VII, the reactor was a packed-bed-type formed by the pebbles in a vertical tube of 1%-inch internal diameter and 18-inches height. Choline solution circulated upflow through the bed, at a 1 liter per minute flow rate, 5 cm/sec average flow velocity, to provide the contact achieved by stirring in Examples I-VII. Hydrogen gas was vented at the top .of the tube. The choline solution was circulated into the bottom of the tube from a holding tank, brought off the top of the tube, and recirculated back to the holding tank. The holding tank was sufficiently large that the aluminum hydroxide product coming from the top of the tube settled to the bottom of the tank, with the circulation to the bottom of the tube being from clarified solution above the bottom of the tank. Experimental conditions and results are presented in Tables II and V. Temperature was measured in the holding tank. EXAMPLES IX-XIII In these examples, aluminum surface area was further decreased. Solutions of choline in water were made as in Example I to yield solution concentrations as given in Table III. The solutions were brought to the temperatures indicated in Table III. Aluminum rods having initial dimensions of 9.3 mm diameter by 33 to 35 mm length were then added to the liquid and the liquid was stirred above the immersed rods. The rods were about 99.99% pure aluminum metal. Reaction times and weight of aluminum reacted were as given in Table III. Unlike Examples X- XIII, there was no stirring in Example IX. Weight of aluminum hydroxide recovered, and the identity of the aluminum hydroxide - gibbsite - appears in Table VI. EXAMPLE IXA Example IX was varied as follows: Instead of a stagnant solution, the solution was continuously stirred. The surface area of the aluminum was 335 mm /gram. For a charge of 25.1 grams, 2.56 grams of aluminum reacted in 6.5 hours. The weight of recovered aluminum hydroxide product was 6.34 grams, a little less than stoichiometric due to scale formation on the reactor walls. The product contained bayerite and nordstrandite. EXAMPLES XIV-XXX I Parameters for these examples are shown in Tables IIIA and II B. The data in Tables IIIA show that there is no consistent difference in rate of the choline-water-aluminum reaction at 60°C between choline solutions which contain methanol and those which do not. The methanol-free choline was prepared by passing choline chloride through a strong-base ion-exchange resin, Rexyn 201 of Fisher Scientific. The data for these examples also shows that there is no consistent difference in the reaction rate between a magnetically stirred reactor and a larger mechanically stirred reactor. The data in Tables IIIB show that the rate for 0.05M choline is much slower than the rate for 0.125M choline (a twelve-fold decrease, while the rate of sodium hydroxide attack varies as the square root of NaOH concentration; see GMELINS HANDBUCH DER ANORGANISCHEN CHEMIE, 8th Edition, Aluminum, Teil A, Abteilung I, Sys.-Nr. 35, p409, Verlag Che ie, Berlin 1934-35) . The rate also falls when the choline concentration is 2.0M, this being the same result seen for 2.0M choline at 60°C. The aluminum hy&roxide particles of the present invention, particularly those produced using a solution containing methanol as well as more than 1.0M choline, show unusual morphologies, as seen in the examples of Figs. 3,4 and 5. The sample of Fig. 3 was prepared with a choline concentration of 2.0M, a reaction temperature of 75°C and a reaction time of -about 6.2 hrs, and has a surface area of about 32.2 m 2 /gm and average pore diameter of about 227 angstroms (BET 4V/A) . The sample of Fig. 4 was prepared with a choline concentration of 2.0M, a reaction temperature of 60°C and a reaction time of about 30 hours. The material has a surface area of about 40 m 2 /gm. The sample of Fig. 5 was prepared with a choline concentration of 1.5M, a reaction temperature of 60°C and a reaction time of about 7.4 hours. The material has a surface area of about 21.1 m 2 /gm and an average pore diameter of about 280.4 angstroms. In each case, the methanol concentration was about 4.6 times greater than the choline concentration. The surface areas and pore sizes were determined through BET nitrogen sorption analysis. It can be seen from Figs. 3-5 that the particles are formed from a plurality of randomly-oriented platelets, resulting in a sponge-like morphology. The platelets are about 0.1 to 0.3μ thick. The spacing and orientation of the platelets is such that the particles have a large number of "macro" openings about 0.05-2.5μ, preferably about 0.1-lμ in size. The aluminum hydroxide particles have a surface area of at least about 1.5 m 2 /gm, preferably at least about 5 m 2 /gm, more preferably about at least 10 m /gm. The aluminum hydroxide particles of the present invention may be calcined to form alumina particles. The calcining can be carried out at, for example, 400 to 800°C. A time of one to three hours is usually sufficient to ensure dehydroxylation. The lower calcining temperatures appear to provide higher surface areas as shown in Tables VII to X. The alumina particles generally have a surface area of at least 375 m 2 /gm, preferably at least 425 m 2 /m. The morphologies of the aluminum hydroxide particles are retained in the alumina particles. With respect to crystal structure, the calcined particles assume the transition (i.e., chi, gamma, or mixtures thereof) alumina phases. As noted above the aluminum hydroxide particles of the present invention are substantially free from alkali metal (especially sodium) contamination. This benefit likewise is retained in the calcined particles. The amount of sodium in the aluminum hydroxide particles is less than 0.01% by weight, preferably less than 0.001%. Similar levels are ound for sodium • oxide in the "calcined particles. The calcined particles also have a large number of relatively large pores, with at least about 30% being at least about 100 angstroms in diameter. The average pore diameter should be 100 angstroms or larger (as determined by the BET method) , preferably at least 200 angstroms. The high surface area range renders the alumina particles suitable for heterogenous catalyst support and absorbent applications. The large pore sizes are particularly useful in allowing transport of very high molecular weight compounds into and out of the pore structure. Such compounds include, for example, heavy compounds in petroleum, peptides and proteins in sorbent applications in biological systems, and synthetic polymers. The aluminum hydroxide particles of this invention can be calcined to form alpha alumina, which in turn can be pressed and sintered. Particles formed at low choline concentrations are particularly useful in this regard. Examples of calcining to form alpha alumina are found in Table XI. Sample 21886-4 was prepared with 0.125M choline and Sample 21886-6 with 0.50M choline. In each case the reaction temperature was 60°C, with a reaction time of 30.4 hrs for the former and 24 hrs for the latter. The Alpha Alumina % column reflects the X-ray diffraction intensity of the samples as compared to that of Alcoa Standard SRPA 87. The results show that alpha alumina was produced. The calcined product obtained can be sintered to form ceramics. For example, Al(OH) 3 produced in a 30 gallon reactor, 0.125 M choline, 75°C, was calcined for 4 hours at 1150°C, and the resulting alpha alumina was given a so- called "ACMA" grind, i.e., 4 kg of grinding balls and 125 gm of the alpha alumina at 62 rpm rotation rate in a 1.3 gallon mill. The ground product was pressed at 5000 psig to form a green body of 2.088 gm/cc density. The pressed alumina compact was then heated to progressively higher temperatures, finishing with one hour at 1540°C, providing an average fired density of 3.943 gm/cc, based on two samples, one 3.942, the other 3.994. Thus, the material of the present invention can be sintered to high densities, i.e., greater than 3.9 gm/cc, using conventional techniques. This provides more efficiency in the sintering operation, allowing either the production of higher density material for given sintering conditions or the use of more economical conditions to provide a given density. Material formed from higher choline concentrations also can be sintered, although the "macroporous" structure of the material limits its use as a ceramic. Such sintered material can be used, for example, in high temperature insulation applications. * mols/llter ** Alcoa 7123 Powder, average particle size - 17 microns. * mole/liter Wt. Al Example Experiment Initial Reacted, gra IX 21804-37 5.0 0.31 IXA 22660-15 25. 1 2.56 X 21886-4 131.5 42.4 XI 21886-6 121.6 52. 11 XII 21886-8 122.8 5.6 XIII 21804-48B 25.2 3. 18 * mols/liter TABLE IIIA Aluminum Reaction with Choline-Water Solutions at 60*C Effect of Methanol on Reaction Rates Choline Methanol Weight Concen¬ Reactor Concen¬ Initial Metal Weight Al Reaction Al(OH), Example Experiment tration T YP e tration Al Metal Wt Surface Area Reacted Time Recovered Reaction Rate* (M) ** (M)*« (pa) (mm) /gm (g™) (hrβ) (go) Reactor Type 1 - Magnetically stirred cultur* flaβV. 2 - Mechanically stirred reactor TABLE IIIB Aluminum Reaction with Chollne-Water Solutions at 75*C Example XXVII XXVIII XXIX XXX XXXI XXXII 2180A-A2 2.0 9.2A 20.05 190 6.59 25.0 12.67 2.59 * gram oles Aluminum reacted (a* Al) hr ** mols/lltsr TABLE IV Choline-Al-H 2 0 Reaction Example Aluminum Hydroxide Phase(s) I Bayerite (Major), Boehmlte (Minor) II Bayerite (Major), Boehmlte (Minor) III Bayerite (Major), Boehmlte (Minor) IV Bayerite (Major), Boehmlte (Minor) TABLE V Chollne-Al-H„0 Reaction t. of Aluminum Example Hydroxide Recovered Aluminum Hydroxide Phase(s) V Gibbsite (Major), Nordstrandite (Major) VI Gibbsite (Major), Nordstrandite (Major), Bayerite (Major) VII Gibbsite (Major), Nordstrandite (Major), Bayerite (Major) VIII 294. 17 TABLE VI Choline-Al-H.O Reaction Wt. of Aluminum Example Hydroxide Recovered Aluminum Hydroxide Phase(a) IX 0.67 Bayerite, Minor Nordstrandite, amorphous IXA 6.34 Bayerite, Nordstrandite X 116.08 All Gibbsite XI 134.36 All Gibbsite XII — All Gibbsite XTII 5.61 All Gibbsite TABLE VII SURFACE AREAS AND PORE VOLUMES OF START INS ALUMINUM HYDROXIDES Sample Number Sample Origin M 3245 Alcoa C331 Ground Bayer AI(OH), 22523-26 AI(OH) From 0.25 M Choline HPA-CH5 AI(OH) From 0.056 M Choline 21886-45 A|(0H) From 2.0 M Choline, 75*C, 28 hr rx 21886-47 AI(OH) From 2.0 M Choline, 75 # C, 6.3 hr rx 21886-48 AI(OH) From 1.5 M choline, 60*C, 7.4 hr rx TABLE VII I SURFACE AREA AND AVERAGE PORE DIAMETER CALCINED ΛI(OH) - CHOLINE PROCESS VS. BAYER Al (OH) Average Pore AI(0H) 3 Diameter, A, Type BET j»V_ Pore Volume Sample Number (Starting Material) A cm /gm 23580-3-1 From 1.5M Chollne-ΛI 36.5 0.420 23580-3-2 From 1.5M Chollnβ-AI 45.2 0.433 23580-3-3 From 1.5M Choi lne-A| 61.2 0.460 23580-3-4 From 1.5M Chollne-AI 102.1 0.482 23580-5-1 C331 Ground Bayer ΛI(0H) 21.6 0.192 23580-5-2 C331 Ground Bayer AKOH), 28.4 0.220 23580-5-3 C331 Ground Bayer Al (OH) 42.9 0.235 23580-5-4 C331 Ground Bayer ΛI(0H), 59.4 0.233. SURFACE AREAS OF ALUMINAS PREPARED BY TABLE IX CALCINING ALUMINAS FROM THE CHOLINE PROCESS (U.S. 887,000) Average Pore Calcination Surface Area Diameter, AI(OH) 3 Temperature, M /gm A <BET 4V> Pore Volume, Sample Number Type (N 2 BET) A cm /gm Al(OH) From 0.25 M Choline, 60*C 3 23127-50-1 22523-26 400 389-7 23127-30-2 500 334.3 23127-50-3 600 248.8 23127-30-4 800 168.6 LSN 535328» Bayerite* CC2037 375 384 LSN 335331 380 360 Bayerltβ produced by the action of choline (0.05 M) then ammonia (aqueous) and acetic acid on a fine aluminum metal powder (see notebook 22331, p. 8 from M. L. Heaver, Chemical Systems Division, Alcoa Laboratories) 21886-43-30 2.0 M Choline, 28 hr rx, 75*C 400 389.0 2I886-45-30A 2.0 M Choline, 28 hr rx, 75'C 600 264.8 21886-47-30 2.0 M Choline, 6.3 hr, 75*C 400 395.7 21886-47-30A 2.0 M Choline, 6.3 hr, 73*C 600 268.0 HPA-CH5-30 0.056 M Choline, 75*C 400 345.0 HPA-CH5-30A 0.056 M Choline, 75*C 600 241.4 TABLE X PHASES PRESENT IN ALUMINAS PRODUCED FROM AMOH), FROM THE PROCESS OF U. S. APPLICATION 887,000 COMPARED WITH BAYER AI(OH), ActIvatIon Samp l e Number Aluminum Hydroxide Origin Temperature, *C Phases Found 23580-3-1 21886-48 From Al + 1.5 M Choline 400 Gamma/cht, trace delta (7), trace boehmlte (2 23580-3-2 21886-48 From Al + 1.5 M Choline 500 Gamma/chl 23580-3-3 21886-48 From Al + 1.5 M Choline 600 Gamma/chl, trace delta (7) 23580-3-4 21886-48 From Al + 1.5 M Choline 800 Gamma/chl 23580-5-1 M3245, C331 Ground Bayer Al (OH) 400 Major boehmlte, major gamma/chl 23580-5-2 M3245, C33I Ground Bayer Al (OH) • 500 Major gamma/chl, trace boehmlte 23580-5-3 M3245, C331 Ground Bayer Al (OH) 600 Gamma/chl 23580-5-4 M3245, C331 Ground Bayer AI(OH)-, 800 Gamma/chl 23127-50-1 AKOH From Aluminum Reaction With 400 Major boehmlte, major chl alumina 0.25M Choline At 60 # C (22523-26) 2 23127-50-2 AI(OH) From Aluminum Reaction With 500 Major gamma/chl alumina 0.25M Choline At 60*C (22523-26) 23127-50-3 AI(OH) From Aluminum Reaction With 600 Major gamma/chl alumina 0.25M Choline At 60*C (22523-26) 23127-50-4 Al (OH) From Aluminum Reaction With 800 Major gamma/chl alumina 0.25M Choline At 60*C (22523-26) 1) Analytical Chemistry Division J.O. 88-040706 TABLE XI Calcining Al(OH) 3 From Choline Process It- will be understood that the above description ofr.the present invention is susceptible to various modifications, changes and adaptations and the same are intended to be 15 comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the appended claims.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A method for the production of aluminum hydroxide, comprising reacting water in the liquid phase and aluminum of surface area of at least 20 mm 2 per gram at a pH above about 12.4 for producing a reaction mixture containing aluminum hydroxide, and collecting solid aluminum hydroxide from the reaction mixture, the reaction being carried out in the presence of choline at a concentration of about 0.05 to 2 mols per liter. 2. A method as claimed in claim 1, the aluminum surface area being less than about 50,000 mm 2 /g. 3. A method as claimed in claim 3, the aluminum surface area being less than about 400 mm 2 /g. 4. A method as claimed in claim 1, the concentration of choline being about 0.05 M for producing bayerite. 5. A method as claimed in claim 1, the concentration of choline being greater than or equal to about 0.5 M for producing gibbsite. 6. A method for the production of aluminum hydroxide, comprising reacting aluminum of surface area of at least 20 mm 2 per gram with liquid water containing choline at a concentration of about 0.05 to 2 mols per liter for producing a reaction mixture containing aluminum hydroxide, and collecting solid aluminum hydroxide from the reaction mixture. 7. A method as claimed in claim 7, the aluminum surface area being less than about 50,000 mm 2 /g. 8. A method as claimed in claim 8, the aluminum surface area being less than about 400 mm 2 /g. 9. A method as claimed in claim 7, the concentration of choline being about 0.05 M for producing bayerite. 10. A method as claimed in claim 1 , the concentration of choline being greater than about 0.5 M for producing gibbsite. 11. Aluminum hydroxide particles formed of a plurality of randomly-oriented platelets constituting a sponge-like morphology having openings in the range of about 0.1 to 2.5μ and being substantially free from sodium. 12. Aluminum hydroxide particles as claimed in claim 11, wherein the amount of sodium is less than about 0.01% by weigh . 13. Aluminum hydroxide particles as claimed in claim 12, wherein the amount of sodium is less than about 0.001% by weight. 14. Aluminum hydroxide particles exhibiting a Bayerite- type or Gibbsite-type x-ray diffraction pattern and having a surface area of at least about 1.5 m 2 /gm, the particles having a size of at least about lμ. 15. Aluminum hydroxide, particles as claimed in claim 14, wherein the surface area is at least about 5 m 2 /gm. 16. Alumina particles formed of a plurality of randomly- oriented platelets constituting a sponge-like morphology having openings in the range of about 0.l to 2.5μ and being substantially free from sodium. 17. Alumina particles as claimed in claim 16, wherein the amount of sodium oxide is less than about 0.01% by weight . 18. Alumina particles as claimed in claim 17, wherein the amount of sodium is less than about 0.001% by weight. 19. Alumina particles having a surface area of at least about 375 m 2 /gm and a size of at least about lμ. 20. Alumina particles as claimed in claim 19, wherein at least about 30% of the pores of the particles have a pore size of at least 100 angstroms. 21. An alpha alumina product having a density greater than 3.9 gm/cc. 22. A method of forming a sintered product, comprising: reacting alumina with liquid water containing about 0.05 to 2 M choline to produce a reaction mixture containing aluminum hydroxide and separating aluminum hydroxide from the reaction mixture; calcining the aluminum' hydroxide to form alumina particles; grinding the alumina particles; compacting the ground particles to form a green body; and heating the green body at a temperature and for a time sufficient to accomplish sintering.

Inventors: MARHANKA JOHN E, MARTIN EDWARD S, WEAVER MARK L, MARHANKA, JOHN, E., MARTIN, EDWARD, S., WEAVER, MARK, L.
Applicants: ALUMINUM CO OF AMERICA, ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA
Application year: 1988
Main classification: C01F7
IPC codes: B01J21, C01F7, C04B35