PHYSIOTHERAPY DEVICE

Abstract: A physiotherapy device for treating spinal disorders comprises a body (6) housing actuating rams operating on pistons (14) which carry feet (15). The pistons (14) are caused to reciprocate so that whilst one diagonal pair is raised, the other will be lowered and vice versa. The device is applied so that the feet (15) rest on the lateral ends of transverse processes to either side of a pair of adjacent vertebrae. The reciprocating motion of the feet (15) then causes a counter-rotational movement between the pair of vertebrae being treated. This can be used to help to relieve a loss of mobility between the joints of the spine. In an alternative use blows are delivered rapidly by the feet (15) so as to trigger natural stretch reflexes which will cause the vertebrae to be brought back into normal alignment from an abnormal displaced condition.

Description: Physiotherapy device. The invention relates to apparatus and procedures designed to correct mechanical disorders of. the spine. The backbone is a complex structure and misuse of the body can result in spinal disorders producing various types of back or neck pain. The precise mechanical disorder is often difficult to diagnose, and even if the source of a malfunction can be determined, the correction of the disorder is far from easy as interactions between vertebrae are incredibly complex, and thus correction of a fault in one area can lead to transference of the problem, possibly in a modified form to another area. Attempted correction of the transferred problem can then lead to the reappearance of the original problem. A further type of disorder results from loss of mobility of the joints of the. dorsal spine. Consequently remedial manipulation applied to a vertebra will result in movement of 'adjacent ones and it is difficult to increase the intravertebral mobility other than over a substantial period of treatments, using conventional manipulative techniques. The invention aims to provide both apparatus and manipulative procedures using that apparatus which enable a physiotherapist to achieve substantial improvements to the conditions referred to above in a relatively short time in the majority of cases. Accordingly, from a first aspect, this invention provides a physiotherapy device comprising a body housing a pair of reciprocatory actuators terminating in feet and projecting in the same direction but displaced at a distance equivalent to the spacing of the lateral ends of transverse processes to either side of a human vertebra, and means for reciprocating the actuators in mutually opposed directions. The reciprocating actuators cause rotational displacement of a vertebra with respect to the adjacent one. In order to avoid significant movement of adjacent vertebrae, in one embodiment, the body will include fixed feet positioned to rest on transverse processes of adjacent vertebrae. In the preferred arrangement, however, four reciprocatory actuators are housed within the body and terminate in ' feet which will rest on the two pairs of transverse processes on an adjacent pair of vertebrae, each diagonal pair of actuators acting synchronously but in mutually opposed directions to the other pair of actuators. These enable an adjacent pair of vertabrae to be rotated in mutually opposite directions. Rocking these two vertebrae in counter- rotation means that less movement has to be applied to each vertebra which will therefore limit the likelihoo of neural concussion of the spinal nerves during treatment. Ideally, the actuators will be controlled by at least one reciprocatory operating member. In one arrangement the device can be constructed so that one operating member controls operation of a linkage to act against a bias member which biases one foot into an extended condition, so as to cause the other foot to be extended. Alternatively, the device may be such that each actuator is or incorporates an operating member, the set of operating members being mutually operated by a control circuit. In one preferred arrangement the reciprocatory operating members will comprise pneumatic or hydraulic rams operated by a fluid logic control circuit, or solenoids operated by an electrical control circuit. Where a control circuit is present it is desirable that it should include adjustment means to enable the speed and force of operation of the actuators to be varied. From a further aspect, the invention provides a method of relieving mechanical disorders of the spine using a device of this invention as hereinbefore defined, w.herein the feet of the device are located over the lateral ends of the transverse processes of affected vertebrae and the device is operated to cause reciprocation of the actuators to deliver blows to the vertebrae to stimulate rotational displacement about the spinal axis of at least one vertebra with respect to the adjacent vertebrae and moving the device along the spine to cause similar displacement to a sequence of vertebrae. The invention may be performed in various ways and preferred embodiments thereof will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:- Figure 1 is an illustration of a pair of human vertebrae in side view; Figure 2 is a plan view of a sequence of vertebrae; Figures 3, 4 and 5- are, side, front and underneath plan views respectively of one form of physiotherapy device of this invention; Figure 6 is a diagrammatic illustration of a fluid logic circuit for controlling the device of Figures 3 to 5; Figure 7 is a representation, of an alternative form of device of this invention in underneath plan view; Figure 8 is a diagrammatic representation of an electrical control unit for operating a physiotherapy device of this invention; and Figure 9 is a diagrammatic sectional view through an alternative form of physiotherapy device of the invention. If a vertebral joint is abnormally stressed (so tha it is displaced, under normal conditions, out of it correct relationship with adjacent vertebrae) roo • compression ' of the spinal nerve may readily result. Figure 1 shows two vertebrae 1 with an intermediat intervertebral disc 2. A spinal nerve 3 project through spaces defined by semi-circular notches i adjacent vertebrae. Misalignment of one of th vertebrae 1 can then cause compression of the spina nerve in the area 4. Momentary closure will b sufficient to cause irritation in the spinal nerve an sensitive dura. When the spine is abnormally stressed root compression will commonly occur during light task well within the range of normal activity. The patien tends to adopt a distorted posture in order to alleviat this root compression, and this tends to reinforce o exacerbate the existing malformation of the spina column. A joint is an inert as distinct from a contractil structure. Therefore, the disposition of a joint mus be an expression of the forces acting on it. In othe words, if a normal joint adopts an abnormal positio then it must be abnormally stressed. Similarly, if structurally normal spine adopts abnormal curvatures- then it must be abnormally stressed. The segments o the spine are designed to move in a co-ordinate fashion. Abnormal stressing and abnormal performance imply loss of proper co-ordination. In man, co¬ ordination of movement is achieved by a mass of interacting reflex responses which are automatic and do not require detailed instruction from the brain. The principal component is the stretch reflex. The stretch reflex involves a relatively simple nervous circuit which causes a muscle to contract automatically in response to being stretched. When we perform tasks such as lifting and twisting, the resulting forces try to displace the vertebrae of the spine. In the normal course of events, these forces are resisted automatically by muscle contraction. The greater the pull, the stronger the contraction. In this way, we remain co-ordinated automatically and can perform a great variety of tasks without a mass of detailed instruction. There is a natural limit to the power and speed of these contractions. We may exceed the power when lifting a heavy object awkwardly or we may exceed both power and speed during some violent incident such as a heavy fall. In these circumstances, vertebrae will be displaced in relation to their neighbours. When this occurs, the system will automatically readjust and the disorganisation will persist. Reflex responses will continue v to respond to stimuli as before. Co-ordinated movement. will continue as before, but the details of co ordination will be altered. The system will naturall resist disorganisation, but once disorganisation ha occurred the system will compensate to the new state The stretch reflexes can be stimulated to cause rapid kick-like movements of individual vertebrae. It i believed that if a great number of these refle responses are triggered in sequence (which can b random) , the system will progressively readjust it state of balance in the direction of least effort. Onc the point of least effort has been reached, th continued stimulation of reflexes will effect no furthe change of geometry. If the system is left free o external influence while the reflexes are bein stimulated, the point of least effort will . be th desired state of balance with the spine smooth an straight. It is the primary function of the device of th invention to trigger a great number of these refle responses in sequence, whilst exercising no furthe influence on the system. A further objective is to use the device t alleviate a common complicating disorder involving los of mobility in the joints of the dorsal spine. If th dorsal spine is immobile, then any movement which shoul involve the dorsal spine, will cause abnormal stressin and abnormal performance of the lumbar and cervical spines. Not surprisingly, violent or forceful mobilization is of little benefit and continues the cycle of soft tissue damage, inflamation, and exacer- bation. Exercise is of limited value and may aggravate the back pain. All the best mobilization techniques are passive, gentle and progressive. . These techniques involve physiotherapists using their hands. It may take many hours to produce a marginal almost imperceptible improvement. Use of the device of the invention can create rapid and effective mobilization automatically. It is an -essential feature of the device that its action provides passive mobilization which is gentle and progressive. The current design of manipulation tool is a pneumatic hand-held device. The patient lies face down while the device is run up and down the length of the spine. It operates pads which cause the vertebrae to be rocked back and forth in a see-saw- motion. The rocking motion is produced by applying " ressure alternately to the lateral ends of the transverse processes 5 (see Figure 2) . The current design employs four pads operated by four double acting actuators controlled by logic gates which, in turn, .are sensitive to supply and exhaust pressures. The actuators are synchronized so as to cause adjacent pairs of vertebrae to be rocked in opposite directions. Figure 2 illustrates an adjacent pair of vertebrae. A, B, C and D represent the four pads. Pads A and D apply pressure simultaneously causing the two vertebrae to be rocked in opposite directions. The cycle is then reversed; pads A and D are withdrawn automatically and pads B and C apply pressure. Thus, the two vertebrae are rocked back and forth in counter rotation. As the device is passed up and down the spine every vertebra is exercised in relation to its neighbours. The size and shape of vertebrae will vary throughout the length of the spine and from patient to patient. The spacing of the pads and the size of the pads has been carefully chosen to cover the greatest variation possible. This problem is eased by the cushion of soft tissue that lies between the pads and the transverse processes. ~~ It is an essential feature of the invention that it does not force a vertabra to move by any predetermined amount. It would be very dangerous to attempt to do this. The device applies a predetermined pressure to the transverse process. The condition of the joints will determine how much a vertebra moves in response to the pressure. Alternating pressures gently tease movement in the joint. At first, the movement may be imperceptible. As the joints are exercised and become more supple, so the amplitude increases automatically. The amount of pressure applied to the transverse processes is predetermined by controlling the supply pressure to the actuators of the device. The speed of operation is controlled by regulating the exhaust pressure. When stress relieving, the device is adjusted so as to deliver a very light but very fast blow. The blow is sufficiently fast to trigger the stretch reflex. As soon as the blow has been struck, the pad is rapidly withdrawn leaving the vertebral system to follow the path of ieast resistance free of external influence. As shown in Figures 3 to 5 the tool.comprises of a plastics housing 6 which incorporates four double acting cylinders 7, a supply fitting 8, an on/off pilot valve 9, a restrictor valve 10, and control valves 11,12,13 (see also Figure 6) . It is powered by compressed air, the regulation of which determines the force produced by the cylinders on pistons 14 leading to four feet 15. By depressing the pilot valve 9, compressed air is supplied to the three pneumatic logic valves 11 to 13. These control valves consist of a flip flop valve 11, and two NOT gates 12,13. The flip flop valve 11 will change the polarity of flow when signalled to do so by a pilot signal from either NOT gate. The NOT gates 12,13 will give output signals to the flip flop valve onl when they sense no pressure in their correspondin circuits. The circuit is so designed that the pistons 14 o two cylinders 7 will be on a downward stroke while tw will be on an upward stroke, each pair of diagonall opposed pistons being in sequence with one another. Th circuit from the control valves to the cylinders can b visualised as being in two parts. Whilst one side i supplying, the other is exhausting and vice vers depending on the orientation of the flip flop valve 11 For simplicity we can call these side A and side B. A the compressed air is fed via the flip flop valve t side A of the cylinders the pistons force the air o side B of the cylinders to atmosphere through th restrictor valve 10. The residual pressure caused b this operation in side B will be sensed by the NOT gate 12,13 and once the circuit has been exhausted it wil signal the flip flop to change polarity and hence th tool will cycle in the opposite direction. B increasing the restriction caused by the restricto valve 10 it will take longer for the residual pressure to die away in the exhausting side of the circuit and so slow down the speed of oscillation. in practice the feet 15 of the tool push against the patient's body until the resistance is equal to the force pre-set by the supply pressure. The pistons then cease to progress down the cylinders and this causes a rapid drop in pressure in the exhausting side of the circuit and in turn a change of cycle. In this manner the length of stroke is governed by the suppleness of the patient and the way in which the operator uses the tool. The device fits neatly into the palm of the hand and is easy to operate. The action of the device is tolerable, relaxing, even pleasant. Figure 7 illustrates a modified form of device to that shown in Figures 3 to 5. This has four fixed feet 17 at the corners of the body 6 and a pair of feet 16 which can be reciprocated. With this arrangement, rotational forces will be applied to one vertebra only by the moving feet 16, whilst the adjacent two vertebrae will be held against movement by the fixed feet 17. A wide range of variants may be produced, each with differing, even exaggerated characteristics. Some variants will be pneumatic, others may be electrically powered and employ electronic controls. For example, Figure 8 illustrates an electronic control circuit 18 which controls the required sequential operation of four solenoids 19 which act on the shafts 14 leading to the feet 15 illustrated in Figures 3 to 5. Another form of construction is illustrated in Figure 9, wherein a pair of feet 15 are connected to shafts 14 which are held in pivot arrangements 20 at t ends of a pivoted lever 21. A spring 22 biases ' one en of the lever 21 in a downward direction and a ram o solenoid actuator 23 can be operated against the bias o ς the spring 22 to reverse the attitudes of the two fee 15.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A physiotherapy device comprising .a body housing a pair of reciprocatory actuators terminating in feet and projecting in the same direction but displaced at a distance equivalent to the spacing of the lateral ends of transverse processes to either side of a human vertebra, and means for reciprocating the actuators in mutually opposed directions. 2. A physiotherapy device according to claim 1, wherein the body includes fixed feet positioned to rest on transverse processes of adjacent vertebrae. 3. A physiotherapy device according to claim 1, -wherein four reciprocatory actuators are housed within the body and terminate in feet which will rest on the two pairs of transverse processes on an adjacent pair of vertebrae, each diagonal pair of actuators acting synchronously but in mutually opposed directions to the other pair of actuators. 4. A physiotherapy device according to any one of e-laims 1 to 3, wherein the actuators are controlled b at least one reciprocatory operating member. 5. A physiotherapy device according to claim 4, wherein one operating member controls operation of linkage to act against a bias member which biases on foot into an extended condition, so as to cause th " other foot to be extended. 6. A physiotherapy device according to claim 4 wherein each actuator is or incorporates an operatin member, the set of operating members being mutuall operated by a control circuit. 7. A physiotherapy device according to any one o claims 4 to 6, wherein the operating members compris pneumatic or hydraulic rams operated by a fluid logi control circuit. 8. A physiotherapy device according to any one o claims 4 to 6 , wherein the operating members compris solenoids operated by an electrical control circuit. 9. A physiotherapy device according to any one of claims 6 to 8, wherein the control circuit includes adjustment means to enable the speed and force of operation of the actuators to be varied. 10. A method of relieving mechanical disorders of the spine using a device as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9 , wherein the feet of the device are located over the lateral ends of the transverse processes of affected vertebrae and the device is operated to cause reciprocation of the actuators to deliver blows to the vertebrae to stimulate rotational displacement about the spinal axis of at least one vertebra with respect to the adjacent vertebrae and moving the device along the spine to cause similar displacement to a sequence of vertebrae. 11. A physiotherapy device or method substantiall as herein descibed with reference to the accompanyin drawings.

Inventors: STOBART MATTHEW JAMES CULLEY, TAYLOR ALAN ROBERT GERARD, STOBART, MATTHEW, JAMES, CULLEY, TAYLOR, ALAN, ROBERT, GERARD
Applicants: STOBART MATTHEW JAMES CULLEY, TAYLOR ALAN ROBERT GERARD, STOBART, MATTHEW, JAMES, CULLEY, TAYLOR, ALAN, ROBERT, GERARD
Application year: 1988
Main classification: A61H1
IPC codes: A61H1, A61H23