Method and apparatus for detecting fault in ring network data transmission system

Abstract: A ring network data transmission system includes a plurality of transmission apparatuses (1, ..., N), terminals (1 a , ..., N c ) each connected to each of the transmission apparatuses and double ring transmission paths (O a , O b ) interconnecting the transmission apparatuses in a ring-like system configuration so that terminals can communicate with one another through the associated transmission apparatuses. When transmission faulty occurs in the network, the transmission apparatus which can serve as the master station issues to all of the other transmission apparatuses a command for searching the fault location. In response to the reception of the command, each of the other transmission apparatuses sends out a monitor signal containing its own address and at the same time checks the monitor signal as received. Through collation of the address contained in the received monitor signal with the address information arrayed in the order in which the transmission apparatuses are interconnected, the number of bypassed transmission apparatuses existing between each transmission apparatus and the transmission apparatus sending out the monitor signal is determined. By comparing this number with a predetermined maximum permissible number of the stages allowable to be bypassed, the faulty location is detected. With such an operation, automatic reconfiguration operation of double ring network can be stabilized.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method for detecting a faulty location according to the introductory part of claim 1 and to a data transmission system with a ring network according to the introductory part of claim 5. More particularly, the present invention is concerned with a network reconfiguring method and data transmission system which are suited for detecting faulty location where the transmission apparatuses are by-passed by optical switches or the like means, involving section or interval loss greater than a predetermined level to cause the operation of the ring network instable. A method of detecting a faulty location and a data transmission system with the features included in the first part of claim 1 and claim 5, respectively, are disclosed in GB-A-21 33 952. According to this method, each transmission apparatus of a ring network system is able to transmit to the adjacent transmission apparatuses test messages and to examine the received reply, whereby a faulty location is detected. Further, a transmission path reconstituting (reconfiguring) method for a ring network data transmission system is disclosed in an article entitled "A 100 Mb/s Optical Local Ring Network which interconnects plural Bus Networks" contained in a Japanese literature "Nikkel Electronics" December 5, 1983, p.p. 173-199. According to this method, occurrence of a transmission fault or failure is detected by a master station, which then issues a command signal commanding the search of the faulty location to the other stations, whereupon each station as well as the master station checks whether the station is next to the failure, which is then followed by issuance of a command to the faulty adjacent station as detected for transition to a loopback state. However, in case of the disconnection of an unstable location brought about by bypassing a multiplicity of successive stages of the transmission apparatuses, a complicated structure of the detecting means for detecting the unstable state is needed and a lot of time is required for the reconstitution (reconfiguration) of the network system. Further, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 137154/1985 (JP-A-60-137154) discloses a transmission path reconstituting method for dealing with the unstable transmission state brought about by signal loss of a magnitude greater than a permissible value in a section where a number of successive transmission stations (apparatuses) are bypassed, i.e. the transmission error rate is increased beyond a prescribed value or varies significantly in dependence on changes in the environmental conditions. In this case, however, the message, for example, the power-down of power of transmission apparatus is given to the adjacent apparatus through a line provided additionally only for this purpose. Consequently, overall system cost is undesirably increased due to the necessity of said message line in addition to the inherent transmission lines. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method and an apparatus for detecting a faulty location in a ring network transmission system wherein the faulty location is disconnected from the system by reconstituting the system configuration such that the instability is eliminated, when the transmission quality is deteriorated beyond a prescribed interval loss, by utilizing only a loopback technique without resorting to an additional separate line for the state message. This object is solved by method according to claim 1 and by a data transmission system according to claim 5. According to the present invention a network configuration reconstituting system for a ring network data transmission system in which upon occurrence of a transmission fault, a transmission apparatus serving as a master station issues a fault searching command to all the other transmission apparatus stations once. In response, each of the transmission apparatuses sends out a monitor signal containing its own address and at the same time checks the received monitor signal from the other stations. For making a decision whether a transmission apparatus is to be set to the loopback state, a table containing addresses of the transmission apparatuses in the order in which they are connected in the ring network is consulted to determine arithmetically the number of repeating stages by-passed before reaching the currently adjacent transmission apparatus. The abovementioned number is compared with a maximum permissible number of the stages allowable to be by-passed which is also stored previously. With such an arrangement, the faulty portion of the location being bypassed can be disconnected from the transmission network system, whereby the system can be positively protected against the instable operation. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 is a block diagram showing a hardware arrangement of a transmission apparatus according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, which is connected in a ring network transmission system together with other transmission apparatus of the identical structure; Fig. 2 is a view showing a system structure of a local ring data transmission network to which the invention can be applied; Fig. 3 is a diagram showing a format of the information which is transferred between configuration control circuits through the respective associated transmission apparatuses; Fig. 4 is a diagram showing a memory map in a storage incorporated in the configuration control circuit; Fig. 5 is a diagram showing a variety of route states which a route change-over circuit incorporated in each transmission apparatus can assume; Fig. 6 is a diagram showing a flow chart executed by the configuration control circuit of the transmission apparatus serving as the master station in one processing mode; Figs. 7 and 8 are diagrams showing, respectively, flow charts executed by the configuration control circuit of the transmission apparatus serving as the slave station in the one processing mode; Fig. 9 is a diagram showing a flow chart executed by the configuration control circuit of the transmission apparatus serving as the master station in other processing mode; Figs. 10 and 11 are diagrams showing flow charts executed by the configuration control circuit of the transmission apparatus serving as the slave station in the other processing mode. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Now, the invention will be described in detail in conjunction with exemplary and preferred embodiments by referring to the drawings. Fig. 2 schematically shows a general configuration of a typical local ring network data transmission system having double ring transmission lines O a and O b and including transmission apparatuses ST₁ to ST N (they are also referred to as transmission station or stage) to which the present invention can be applied. As will be seen in the figure, information terminals 1a to Nc of various types installed distributively in the premises are connected to the ring transmission lines O a and O b (each constituted, for example, by optical fiber) by way of the respective transmission apparatus 1 to N, whereby a ring network is formed as a whole so that communication can be carried out among the individual terminals 1a to Nc. The network of this type functions as a nervous system and becomes increasingly importance in data processing. In such a ring network system, each information terminal can make use of the transmission lines with high efficiency. On the other hand, a drawback is also seen in that the influence of transmission trouble tends to spread over large area. With a view to increasing the reliability of the ring network of this type, bypass and loopback techniques are widely adopted. The effectiveness of these techniques depends on the types of transmission trouble. Accordingly, adoption of both the bypass and loopback techniques in combination is preferred over sole use thereof. With the present invention, the local ring network of high reliability as mentioned above is envisaged as the object to which the invention is to be applied. Fig. 1 shows in a hardware block diagram an arrangement of a data transmission apparatus according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, which apparatus is applied to a double ring transmission network system mentioned above. The transmission apparatus N shown in Fig. 1 corresponds to any of the transmission apparatuses 1 to N in the ring network system shown in Fig. 2 and is constituted generally by five major function blocks 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 described below. As the first function block, there can be mentioned a bypass circuit 10 which is realized by two sets of optical switches in correspondence with the transmission lines O a and O b and used for disconnecting the transmission apparatus N from the transmission lines upon occurrence of trouble or fault. Although no operation control lines for the optical switches are shown, it will be appreciated that the bypass circuit can be actuated automatically in response to the occurrence of fault or trouble such as shutdown of the power supply and failure of hardware or manually through manual operation. Second, a route change-over circuit 20 is provided for changing the intra-apparatus routes for the signal incoming from the transmission path and information signal generated by the sender described below. Ordinarily, only one of the routes is used for communication between the terminals, the other being set to a standby state as a reserve or spare route. More specifically, the route change-over circuit 20 is composed of receivers 21 (R B ) and 25 (R A ) each having functions such as opto-electrical (light-to-electric signal) conversion, retiming, demodulation etc, transmitters 22 (T A ) and 26 (T B ) having functions such as modulation, electrooptical (electric-to-light signal) conversion, two multiplexers or selectors 23 (MX A ) and 27 (MX B ) for transmission and a multiplexer (selector) 24 (MX R ) for reception. Select command for the individual multiplexers are provided by a configuration control circuit 40 which will be described in detail hereinafter. Third, an information transmitting circuit 30 is provided for allowing mutual transfer of information between the configuration control circuits 40 incorporated, respectively, in the individual data transmission apparatuses, and includes command storages 31 (PR B ) and 33 (PR A ) and command generators 32 (PG A ) and 34 (PG B ) corresponding to the pair of transmission paths, respectively. The command storage and the command generator are each realized in a structure capable of transferring information in such a format as shown in Fig. 3 among the configuration control circuits 40 in different transmission apparatus and may be implemented in the form of FIFO (First-In, First-Out) registers. The configuration control circuit 40 cooperates with the corresponding circuits 40 of the identical structure provided in other data transmission apparatuses to detect occurrence of trouble or fault in the transmission network and/or serve for detection of recovery and controlling of reconstitution or reconfiguration of the transmission network such as disconnection of the location where the trouble is detected from the network and/or restoration from the fault state. The configuration control circuit 40 is mainly composed of a microprocessor 41 (MPU), a memory 42 (MEM) and a microcomputer bus 43. Command for the route selection to the route change-over circuit 20 and information transfer between the information transmitting circuits 30 of the different transmission apparatus are controlled by the microprocessor 41 through the microcomputer bus 43. Finally, an access control circuit 50 is provided for allowing the terminals Na to Nm connected to the transmission apparatus under consideration to perform data transmission and reception and is constituted by a transmission frame control circuitry 55 (FRC) serving for the control of generation of the transmission frame and the timing control and terminal access control circuitries 51 (ACL₁) to 53 (ACL M ) installed for the individual terminals, respectively, and each having an access control function and a terminal interfacing function. The signal received from a transmission path is delivered to the transmission bus 54 by way of the receiver 21 or 25, the reception multiplexer 24 and the transmission frame control circuit 55 to be supplied to the individual terminal access circuits 51 to 53. This information as well as the signal to be transmitted from the terminal access control circuit is conveyed from the transmission bus 54 to the transmission path by way of the transmission multiplexer 23 or 27 and the transmitter 22 or 26. The information received by the receiver 21 or 25 is also supplied to the associated command storage 31 or 33 and additionally supplied to the microprocessor 41 through the bus 43 to be thereby identified. On the other hand, the configuration control command issued from the microprocessor 41 is supplied through the bus 43 to the command generator 32 or 34, whereupon the pattern of the configuration command pattern is set at the command generator 32 or 34 to allow the configuration control command to be sent out repetitively. Each transmission multiplexer or selector is adapted to select as the input thereto one of the signals from the command generator circuit, transmission bus and the receiver. The selection of the signal in dependence on the system condition and corresponding configurations of the apparatus will be described in detail hereinafter. Fig. 3 shows a format for the information transferred between the configuration control circuits of the data transmission apparatuses. There are four types of information as represented by A, B, C and D, respectively, each of a predetermined constant length inclusive of the synchronizing pattern SYN located at the leading end of the format. The information format contains additionally an address field DA for the addressed data transmission apparatus, another address field SA for the sender data transmission apparatus, an information type field TYP and a sub-information field SUB. The aforementioned command storage 31 or 33 detects the synchronization pattern SYN and stores therein the number of data bytes corresponding to the information succeeding to the synchronization pattern SYN. Parenthetically, test information for checking the transmission error is omitted from the illustration. Fig. 4 is a view illustrating an example of a memory map in the storage 42 incorporated in the configuration control circuit. The storage 42 stores therein at least three types of information required for the configuration control. They are: (1) address of the associated transmission apparatus (MSA), (2) a table of addresses of the intra-network transmission apparatuses arrayed in the order in which the apparatuses are connected in the network (SAO), and (3) tables containing the permissible maximum numbers of stages allowable to be bypassed between the associated transmission apparatus and one located upstream thereof on both transmission paths, respectively (ABY, BBY). All the tables mentioned above are prepared and stored at the time of establishment of the system. It should be noted that two sorts of tables (ABY, BBY) mentioned above are prepared in view of the fact that a pair of transmission paths for transmission in opposite directions are provided. In a simplified and preferred embodiment of the present invention, the configuration control circuit can be so implemented that the maximum number of station allowable to be bypassed in every section is equal to 1. In this case, the tables (ABY, BBY) can be spared, i.e. the optical bypass is permitted for one stage, while the bypass over two or more successive stages is inhibited. Further, the table (SAO) need not always be provided in all the transmission apparatus. Such arrangement can also be adopted so that the table (SAO) is available to only the transmission apparatus serving as the master station. Next, description will be directed to how the information described above are handled or processed. Upon reception of the type B information shown in Fig. 3 (i.e. the search monitor signal), the sender address information SA contained in this command is checked. By consulting the address table SAO, a memory point having the content which coincides with the sender address information SA mentioned above is detected, whereupon the number of the repeater stations encountered from that sender station is counted. Next, the permissible maximum station bypass number table ABY or BBY is consulted to compare the count value with the preset station number stored in the storage of the transmission apparatus which received this type-B information signal. When the comparison shows that the abovementioned count value is greater than the preset station number, it is decided that the transmission section of concern is in the normal repeating state. Fig. 5 shows in a list various types of the routes which the route exchange circuit 20 can assume. The use of these route configuration as well as states of the input signals to the A-path transmission selector (multiplexer) 23, B-path transmission selector 27 and the reception selector 24, respectively, are as follows: Type 1 Transmission through A-route with B-route being bypassed (1, 2, 1). Type 2 Transmission through B-route with A-route being bypassed (2, 1, 0). Type 3 B-to-A loopback (0, 1, 1) Type 4 A-to-B loopback (1, 0, 0) Type 5 Sending out through both routes (0, 0, X) Type 6 Transmission through A-route and sending through B-route (1, 0, 1) Type 7 Transmission through B-route and sending through A-route (0, 1, 0) It should be noted that in the transmission and the loopback states mentioned above, the received information is supplied to the transmission bus 54 from the reception selector 24 through the transmission frame control circuit 55, while the sending indicates that of the information generated by the command generator. Now, description will be turned to operations of the various circuits and units which are triggered in response to occurrence of trouble or fault in the network system. In this connection, it should be recalled that two different types of systems may be available, i.e. (1) the distributed processing type system in which all the transmission apparatuses are provided with the connecting order-based address table (SAO) and the permissible maximum station bypass number tables (ABY and BBY), and (2) the concentrated processing type system in which only the master station is equipped with these tables SAO, ABY and BBY. First, description will concern the distributed processing type network system. Fig. 6 shows a flow of processings executed by the configuration control circuit 40 of the transmission apparatus serving as the master station in the distributed processing type network system, while Figs. 7 and 8 show corresponding processing flows executed by the configuration control circuits 40 of the transmission apparatuses serving as the slave stations. In this conjunction, it should be mentioned that the master station means the transmission apparatus imparted with a function to control the network configuration, while the slave station means the other transmission apparatus which is not imparted with such configuration control function, and that both of the transmission apparatuses are implemented in the identical structure when viewed from the standpoint of hardware. Ordinarily, a given one of the transmission apparatuses installed within the network serves as the master station. With this arrangement, the structure of the network can be simplified while assuring high reliability. Of course, appropriate back-up means may be adopted such that a given one of the slave stations can replace the master station when a fault or trouble is detected in the master station itself to thereby mitigate the influence of the trouble occurred in the master station. Upon detection of trouble or fault in both transmission paths, the master station (i.e. master transmission apparatus) assumes the state (type 5 in Fig. 5) in which the fault adjacency search command (command A) is sent out onto both transmission paths. In response to the reception of this command A, each of the slave stations is set to the state (type 6 or 7 in Fig. 5) in which the search monitor signal (TYP B ○ in Fig. 3) is sent out onto the transmission path in the direction opposite to the direction in which the command TYP A ○ (i.e. fault adjacency search command) was received. Subsequently, the configuration control circuits of the transmission apparatuses inclusive of the master station detect the abovementioned search monitor signal and check the contents thereof. In the master station, it is required to check both transmission paths. To this end, the transmission path B is checked and followed by the check of the transmission path A. This check may bring about four different results, as is shown in Fig. 6. (a) Case in which no monitor signal is received from either transmission path or otherwise the bypassed station number exceeds the preset value. In this case, it is decided that trouble occurs on both sides of the transmission apparatus under consideration. Consequently, the current searching mode is maintained until the fault is eliminated. (b) Case in which the normal monitor signal is received only from the transmission path A. In this case, the master station itself is required to serve as the loopback end station. Accordingly, the master station sends out the go-to-loopback command (command TYP D ○ in Fig. 3) for establishing the loopback state. Subsequently, the circuit configuration of the type 3 shown in Fig. 6 is established to restart the transmission. (c) Case in which the normal monitor signal is received only from the transmission path B. In this case, the go-to loopback command (command TYP D ○ in Fig. 3) is sent out onto the path A for establishing the loopback for the path A. Subsequently, the route configuration of the type 4 (Fig. 5) is realized to restart the transmission. (d) Case in which the normal monitor signal is received from both transmission paths A and B. In this case, the go-to loopback command (command TYP D ○) is sent out sequentially onto both paths to establish the loop backstate. Subsequently, transmission is restarted in the route configuration of the type 1 (Fig. 5). In case of the slave transmission apparatus, the corresponding check brings about four different cases, as follows (refer to Figs. 7 and 8): (a) Searching is performed for the fault in the path B (with command received from the path A). When the normal monitor signal is received, the go-to loopback command (command TYP D ○) from the master station is detected, whereupon the configuration of the type 1 (Fig. 5) is resumed. (b) When the searching of the fault in the path B results in no reception of the monitor signal or when the number of the repeating stations through which the monitor signal as received has been relayed is out of the preset range, the loopback configuration of the type 3 (Fig. 5) is established in response to the go-to loopback command (command TYP D ○) from the master station. (c) When the searching of fault in the path A is performed (with the command received from the path B) results in the reception of the normal monitor signal, configuration of the type 2 shown in Fig. 5 is established upon detection of the go-to loopback command (command TYP D ○) from the master station. (d) When the searching of fault in the path A results in no reception of the monitor signal or when the number of the repeating stations through which the monitor signal has passed is out of the preset range, the loopback configuration of the type 4 shown in Fig. 5 is established upon detection of the go-to loop back command (command TYP D ○) from the master station. Next, description will be made of the centralized type processing operation by referring to Figs. 9, 10 and 11, in which Fig. 9 shows processing flows executed by the master station (master transmission apparatus), and Figs. 10 and 11 show processing flows executed by the slave station. Upon detection of fault in both transmission paths, the master station assumes the state of the type 5 shown in Fig. 5 in which the fault adjacency search command (command TYP A ○) is sent out onto both transmission paths. In response to the reception of the fault adjacency search command, each of the slave stations assumes the state of the type 6 or type 7 to send out the search monitor signal (command TYP B ○) onto the transmission path opposite to that through which the fault adjacency search signal (command TYP A ○) was received. Subsequently, the master station detects the abovementioned monitor signal and checks the contents thereof to specify the location where fault takes place. In the master station, the two transmission paths are supervised sequentially, whereby four cases will be resulted from the supervision, as mentioned below: (a) Case where no monitor signal is received from both transmission paths or otherwise the number of the stations which were bypassed by the monitor signal exceeds the prescribed value. In this case, the current searching state is maintained until the fault is removed. (b) Case where the normal monitor signal is received only from the transmission path A. In this case, it is required that the master station itself functions as the loopback end. The master station then sends out through the transmission path B the search stop command (command TYP C ○) to the slave transmission apparatus (slave station) which issued the abovementioned monitor signal and checks the succeeding section in the similar manner. When a faulty location is finally detected, the master station issues the go-to loopback command (command TYP D ○) to complete disconnection of the faulty location, which is then followed by the transition to the configuration of the type 3 to restart the transmission. (c) Case where the normal monitor signal is received only from the transmission path B. In this case, the search stop signal (command TYP C ○) is sent out through the transmission path A to the transmission apparatus which issued the abovementioned monitor signal and checks the succeeding stations sequentially in the similar manner. When a faulty location is finally detected, the go-to loopback command (command D ○) is issued to the transmission apparatus located adjacent to the faulty location to thereby complete the network reconfiguration. Subsequently, the transmission state of the type 4 shown in Fig. 5 is resumed to allow the transmission to be restarted. (d) Case in which the normal monitor signal is received from both the transmission paths. In this case, the loopback state is created sequentially for each of the transmission paths through the similar procedure as mentioned in conjunction with the cases (b) and (c). Thereafter, the configuration of the type 1 shown in Fig. 5 is established to allow the transmission to be restarted. In the slave station, there arise four situations mentioned above. (a) Case in which the go-to loopback command (command TYP D ○) addressed to the very transmission apparatus which sent out the monitor signal (command TYP B ○) to the transmission path B is not received by that transmission apparatus through the transmission path A. In this case, the configuration of the type 1 shown in Fig. 5 is resumed at the time when the other transmission apparatus serving as the master station has completed the network reconfiguration operation in response to the reception of the go-to loopback command addressed to other transmission apparatus. (b) Case where the go-to loopback command (command TYP D ○) issued by the master station is received by the very transmission apparatus that sent out the monitor signal to the path B. In this case, the loopback state of the type 3 shown in Fig. 5 is assumed, waiting for the restart of transmission. (c) Case where the go-to loopback command is not received by the very transmission apparatus that sent out the monitor signal (command TYP B ○) to the path A. In this case, the configuration of the type 2 shown in Fig. 5 is resumed and the restart of transmission is waited for. (d) Case in which the go-to loopback command (command TYP D ○) issued by the master station is received by the very transmission apparatus that sent out the monitor signal (command TYP B ○) onto the path A. In this case, the loopback configuration of the type 4 shown in Fig. 5 is established, wherein the restart of transmission is waited for. In the foregoing, the present invention has been described on the assumption that a faulty location which causes a plurality of stations to be successively bypassed to thereby render the transmission in the associated section instable is to be disconnected. It should however be understood that the concept of the present invention can equally be applied to the opposite case where the disconnected section is restored to the network system after the fault has been eliminated. In this case, the arrangement may be made such that the transmission apparatus to be restored from the bypassed state issues information including the address of that transmission apparatus, wherein the loopback end station which receives the abovementioned information or alternatively the master station which receives the message of the reception of that information from the loopback end station can perform the detection of the permissible bypassed station number and the decision in the similar manner as described hereinbefore.

Claims: A method for detecting a faulty location in a ring network system including a plurality of transmission apparatus (1, ..., N), terminals (1a, ..., Nc) connected to each of said transmission apparatuses and double ring transmission paths (O a , O b ) for interconnecting said transmission apparatuses in a ring-like configuration so that each terminal can communicate with each other by way of the respective associated transmission apparatus, said method including the step of searching for the address of an adjacent one of said transmission apparatuses, characterized in that said method comprising the further steps of: determining arithmetically the stage number of bypassed transmission apparatuses on the basis of said address of said adjacent transmission apparatus and predetermined addresses indicating an order in which the transmission apparatuses are connected; and comparing said arithmetically determined number of bypassed transmission apparatuses with a predetermined maximum number of the transmission apparatuses allowable to be bypassed to thereby detect the faulty location in said ring network system. A method according to claim 1, wherein each of said transmission apparatuses (1,...,N) includes bypass means (10) for causing said ring transmission path to bypass the transmission apparatus, route change-over means (20) for changing over connecting relation between said transmission apparatus and said double-ring transmission paths (O a , O b ), configuration control means (40) for controlling indexing operation for indexing a faulty location and information transfer means (30) for performing information transfer with the configuration control means of other transmission apparatuses. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the search of the address of the adjacent transmission apparatus is realized in such a manner that said configuration control means (40) sends out information containing the address of the associated transmission apparatus to the configuration control means of all the other transmission apparatuses, wherein the address contained in the information received by the configuration control means is regarded as the address of the adjacent transmission apparatus. A method according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein when said configuration control means (40) detects that the number of the bypassed stages exceeds said maximum allowable bypassed stage number, said configuration control means issues a command to said route change-over means (20) for disconnecting the corresponding transmission apparatus from said ring network. A data transmission system with a ring network, comprising a plurality of transmission apparatuses (1, ..., N), terminals (1 a , ..., N c ) connected to each of said transmission apparatuses and double ring transmission paths (O a , O b ) for interconnecting said transmission apparatus in a ring-like configuration so that each terminal can communicate with each other by way of the respective associated transmission apparatus, characterized in that each of said transmission apparatuses includes bypass means (10) for causing said ring transmission path to bypass the transmission apparatus, route change-over means (20) for changing over connecting relation between said transmission apparatus and said double-ring transmission paths, configuration control means (40) for controlling said route change-over means and indexing operation for locating a faulty portion, information transfer means (30) for performing information transfer with the configuration control means of other transmission apparatus, and storage means (42) for storing the order in which the transmission apparatuses are connected in said ring network, wherein configuration control means (40) searches the address of the currently adjacent transmission apparatus, collates the searched address with address information arrayed in a predetermined order in which the transmission apparatuses are connected in said ring network to thereby determine the number of stages bypassed before reaching said currently adjacent transmission apparatus, and compares the number of the bypassed stages with a predetermined number of stages allowed to be bypassed to thereby detect the faulty portion within said ring network. A data transmission system according to claim 5, wherein the search of the address of the currently adjacent transmission apparatus is realized in such a manner that said configuration control means (40) sends out information containing the address of the associated transmission apparatus to the configuration control means of all the other transmission apparatuses, wherein the address contained in the information received by the configuration control means is regarded as the address of the adjacent transmission apparatus. A data transmission system according to claim 5 or 6, wherein when said configuration control means (40) detects that the number of the bypassed stages exceeds said maximum allowable bypassed stage number, said configuration control means issues a command to said route change-over means (20) for disconnecting the corresponding transmission apparatus from said ring network. A data transmission system according to any of claims 5 to 7, wherein said storage means (42) stores a predetermined maximum permissible number of stages allowable to be bypassed before reaching the currently adjacent transmission apparatus. A data transmission system according to any of claims 5 to 8, wherein collation is performed for determining whether said number of the bypassed stages is greater than said predetermined permissible number of stages allowable to be bypassed.

Inventors: HAMADA TAKUJI, ONUKI KEN, TAKAHASHI MASAHIRO, UCHIYAMA TOSHIHIKO, YONEDA KATSUHIKO, HAMADA, TAKUJI, ONUKI, KEN, TAKAHASHI, MASAHIRO, UCHIYAMA, TOSHIHIKO, YONEDA, KATSUHIKO
Applicants: HITACHI LTD, HITACHI PROCESS COMPUTER ENG, HITACHI PROCESS COMPUTER ENGINEERING, INC., HITACHI, LTD.
Application year: 1988
Main classification: H04L12
IPC codes: H04L12