APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRIPPING A SYSTEM FOR THE PROTECTION OF OCCUPANTS OF A VEHICLE

Abstract: An apparatus for tripping a system for the protection of occupants of a vehicle has a first sensor (10) for sensing the acceleration of the vehicle in its direction of forward motion and a second sensor (12) for sensing the acceleration of the vehicle in a direction transverse to its direction of forward motion. The two sensors are under the control of control means (14, 16) which triggers the occupant protection system in dependence upon the signals from the first and second sensors (10, 12).

Description: DESCRIPTION APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRIPPING A SYSTEM FOR THE PROTECTION OF OCCUPANTS OF A VEHICLE State of the Art The present invention relates to an apparatus and method of the kinds described in the precharacterising clauses of claims 1 and 8 respectively. In known vehicle occupant restraining devices, such as inflatable airbags, the devices are actuated when the acceleration of the vehicle, as measured by an accelero eter, is above a certain value which indicates that the vehicle has crashed. However, the known sensor systems often actuate the restraining devices too late if the impact is oblique (e.g. 30°) or if the impact is a slow offset crash. This is due mainly to the greatly differing energy-absorbtion behaviour of vehicles having a crumple zone in the case of frontal and oblique impacts. Known systems for determining the acceleration of the vehicle are either in the form of a central sensor system or in the form of a plurality of decentralised sensors. However, in both cases, the acceleration signal is measured only in the longitudinal direction of motion of the vehicle, resulting in problems in actuating the occupant restraining device when a significant acceleration is experienced along an axis ' other than the longitudinal direction of motion of the vehicle. It is an object of the present invention to provide an apparatus and method of triggering vehicle occupant restraining devices which will be effective in actuating the devices even if an impact on the vehicle is not a frontal impact. This is achieved by adopting the features set forth in claim 1. Further advantages are obtained by the features of claims 2 to 8. Drawings By way of example only, specific embodiments of the present invention will now be described, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:- Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a first embodiment of a triggering apparatus for an inflatable airbag, in accordance with the present invention; Fig. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of a second embodiment of a triggering apparatus for an inflatable airbag, in accordance with the present invention; Fig. 3 is a diagrammatic representation of a third embodiment of a triggering apparatus for an inflatable airbag, in accordance with the present invention; and Fig. 4 is a diagrammatic representation of a fourth embodiment of a triggering apparatus for an inflatable airbag, in accordance with the present invention. Description of the Exemplary Embodiments Referring firstly to the first embodiment, illustrated in Fig. 1, the apparatus comprises a sensor 10 for detecting the acceleration of a vehicle along an axis parallel to the forward direction of motion'of the vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the longitudinal direction), and a sensor 12 for detecting the acceleration of the vehicle along an axis inclined at right angles to the longitudinal axis (hereinafter referred to as the transverse direction). The longitudinal acceleration sensor and the transverse acceleration sensor feed signals a χ and a y to respective evaluation devices 14, 16. The evaluation devices 14, 16 may, for example, be in the form of electronic integrators. If the evaluation means 14 determines that the longitudinal acceleration is greater than a predetermined threshold value then the evaluation means 14 sends a signal b to an output stage 18 which is in the form of a transistor switch. The output stage is effectively an electrical or electronic switch actuated by the signal b, and sends a further signal c which actuates actuation capsules 20, the present example being for the case of an inflatable restraining bag. It will be noted from Fig. 1 that the output of the evaluation means 16 relating to the transverse acceleration is fed into the evaluation means 14 relating to the longitudinal acceleration. The signal from the evaluation means relating to the transverse acceleration is used to change the evaluation algorithm of the evaluation means 14 relating to the longitudinal acceleration. In this way, even if the longitudinal acceleration sensed is not above the threshold value for actuating the actuation capsules, the evaluation means 14 may determine, upon receipt of the signal from the evaluation means 16, that the overall acceleration of the vehicle is sufficient for the actuation capsule to be actuated, even though neither of the longitudinal and transverse accelerations would, by themselves, be sufficient to do so. It is also useful when, because of the nature of the impact of the vehicle, such as an oblique impact, the eventual acceleration would be sufficient in one direction for the actuation capsules to be actuated, but only after a delay. The present invention reduces the said delay considerably. The second embodiment, illustrated in Fig. 2, has the same components as the first embodiment, illustrated in Fig. 1. However, the signal a χ from the longitudinal acceleration sensor 10 is also sent to the transverse evaluation means 16, in addition to the longitudinal evaluation means 14. As before, the longitudinal acceleration still forms the basis of calculating whether the actuation capsules 20 are to be actuated. However, the two signals a χ and a y from the longitudinal and transverse acceleration sensors 10, 12 are processed together in the transverse evaluation means 16. In this way, the overall magnitude and direction of the acceleration of the vehicle can be determined, and the output of the evaluation means 16 can be used to change the actuation parameters of the longitudinal evaluation means 14. For example, even if the longitudinal acceleration a χ is not sufficient for the evaluation means 14 to actuate the actuation capsules 20, then, depending on the signal from the evaluation means 16, the evaluation means 14 may still send a signal b to the output stage 18, which in turn actuates the actuation capsules by virtue of a signal c. The second embodiment thus permits actuation of the actuation capsules in certain predetermined conditions. The third embodiment, illustrated in Fig. 3, is provided with longitudinal and transverse acceleration sensors 10, 12. Two evaluation channels, channel 1 and channel 2, are provided, and the outputs a χ , a y from the sensors 10, 12 are fed into each of the evaluation channels 1 and 2. The channels and 2 may comprise, for example, components 14 and 16 of Fig. 1 or Fig. 2, and operate in the same way as described in the first and second embodiments respectively, described above. Each channel 1 and 2 can then determine, independently of the other channel, whether the components of the acceleration of the vehicle reach the predetermined threshold values, and in the case of a positive response, each channel outputs a signal d. The output from channel 1 is fed into a test switch 22, whereas the output of channel 2 is fed into an output stage 18', which has a similar function to the output stage 18 of the first and second embodiments, but which has four outputs for providing an actuating signal c to each of four actuation capsules 20, illustrated schematically. The test switch 22 is a further output stage, and in this particular embodiment is identical to output stage 18' , or any other transistor switch. The actuation capsules are connected between the output stage 18' and the test switch 22. This arrangement means that the actuation capsules 20 may only be actuated if a signal is received from both of the channels, 1 and 2. This guards against possible mis-evaluation in one of the channels, since the capsules are actuated only if both channels determine that the conditions of acceleration for actuation of the capsules have been met. The fourth embodiment, illustrated in Fig. 4, also has longitudinal and transverse acceleration sensors 10, 12. The acceleration signals a χ and a„ are fed to respective integrators 24, 26. The integrated signal from a χ is then fed directly to evaluation means 28 which determines whether the signal from the integrator 24 is above the predetermined threshold value. If this is indeed the case, i.e. that the longitudinal acceleration is such that the restraining means should be used, the evaluation means 28 feeds a signal b to an output stage 30, which in turn feeds an actuating signal c to the or each actuation capsule 20. The integrated signals from the integrators 24, 26 are also fed to a second evaluation means 32. Depending upon the relative magnitudes of the two signals, the magnitude and the direction of the acceleration of the vehicle can be determined, and if they are such as to exceed the predetermined threshold values of the second evaluation means 32 (i.e. they are of such relative strengths that an impact which requires actuation of the safety means has occurred) a signal A is output, and fed into the first evaluation means 28, which, as previously, acts to actuate the actuation capsules 20. The output signals of the integrators 24, 26 are also each fed to a further respective integrator 34, 36, and the output of the further integrators 34, 36 are fed into a third evaluation means 38. If the relative values of the two doubly-integrated signals exceed the predetermined values (which indicate that an impact requiring the actuation of the restraining device is required) then a signal B is output from the evaluation means 38 and input into the first evaluation means 28. The first evaluation means 28 then acts to actuate the actuation capsules 20. Thus, the fourth embodiment can act to actuate the actuation capsules where the longitudinal acceleration by itself would not be sufficient to trip the actuation, but where the overall acceleration requires that tripping should occur. It is also most beneficial in the case where the longitudinal acceleration would eventually be sufficient to trip the actuation capsules, but only after a delay. This embodiment often allows earlier tripping of the actuation capsules, especially where an oblique impact is involved. The present invention has the advantage that, compared with decentralised sensors, the arrangement of the sensors in a centralised unit results in lower installation costs and less risk caused by damage to cable strands. The invention is also particularly suitable for adapting existing vehicles, as opposed to fitting the system in a new vehicle, during construction. The present invention has been described mainly with reference to actuation of an air bag, but it should be appreciated that it can equally well be applied to other safety systems. For example, the signals b or c from the output stages may be used to tighten safety belts and/or actuate a central door locking system and/ or actuate a flashing warning light system . The present invention also has the advantage that separate additional functions can be controlled by all round detection of acceleration. For example, central locking and flashing warning systems might have all round se-nsitivity, i.e. may be actuated when the acceleration in any direction exceeds a predetermined valve, an airbag might only be activated in the case of the frontal acceleration component reaching a threshold valve, whereas belt tightness and central belt locking might be activated in an all round sensitive manner, depending on the wishes of the vehicle owner. The second sensor need not detect acceleration in the transverse direction, but may, for example, detect acceleration in a direction other than at right angles . to the direction of forward motion. For example, the sensor 12 may be adapted to detect acceleration in a direction of oblique impact, e.g. 30 degrees to the direction of forward motion.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. An apparatus for tripping a system for the protection of occupants of a vehicle, comprising a first sensor (10) for sensing the acceleration of the vehicle along a first axis, in the direction of forward motion of the vehicle, characterised by a second sensor (12) for sensing the acceleration of the vehicle along a second axis, inclined to the first axis, and a control means (14,16), responsive to signal from the first and second sensors, the occupant protection system being triggered by control means in dependence upon the signals from the first and second sensors. 2. An apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first and second sensors (10,12) are arranged to detect acceleration in two mutually perpendicular directions. 3. An apparatus as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the first and second sensors (10,12) are disposed centrally. 4. An apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein the two sensors are disposed in a housing. 5. Apparatus as claimed in any of claims 1 to 4, wherein the signal from the second sensor (12) is used to change an evaluation algorithm of the control means (14,16). 6. Apparatus as claimed in any of claims 1 to 6, wherein the signal from the first and/or second sensor is used to change an actuation parameter of the control means (14,16). 7. Apparatus as claimed in any of claims 1 to 6, wherein the signals- from both the first and second sensors (14,16) are processed simultaneously in separate control means (1,2) which are connected in series. 8. A method of tripping a system for the protection of occupants of a vehicle, comprising sensing the acceleration of the vehicle along a first axis, in the direction of forward motion of the vehicle, characterised by sensing the acceleration of vehicle along a second axis, inclined to the said first axis, and triggering the vehicle occupant restraining device in dependence upon the signals from the first and second sensors.

Inventors: CODNE CLAUS, HENNE MICHAEL, JEENICKE EDMUND, MATTES BERNHARD, CODNE, CLAUS, HENNE, MICHAEL, JEENICKE, EDMUND, MATTES, BERNHARD
Applicants: BOSCH GMBH ROBERT, ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
Application year: 1988
Main classification: B60R21
IPC codes: B60R21, G01P15