Method and apparatus for detecting and discriminating faults in transmission circuits

Abstract: Discriminating means (D S ,D R ) are coupled to receive signals from a protected transmission circuit (2). The discriminating means (D S , D R ), also receives from a directional detector (DD) signals indicating whether any fault which occurs is forward of, or reverse of, a predetermined point. The discriminating means is arranged to produce an output signal (T S ,T R ) to trip a circuit breaker (4) of the protected circuit (2) only if a fault occurs within the protected circuit (2). In this respect, the discriminating means (D S ,D R ) only outputs a trip signal if it receives within the same time period both a signal from the directional detector indicating that the fault is appropriately located, and high frequency signals from the protected circuit (2). Thus the invention utilises the high frequency noise invariably generated when faults arise in transmission systems. The invention has the advantage that it provides good discrimination of faults without requiring communication links between discriminating means at each end of a protected circuit, as has previously been necessary.

Description: The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for protecting transmission circuits against faults. Particularly in transmission systems having a number of transmission lines carrying high voltages, it is important to ensure that any faults arising are detected so that the affected transmission line can be isolated from the system. Equally though, it is important to ensure that lines are not isolated unnecessarily. DE-C-543951 describes a method of protecting a transmission system including a number of transmission circuits against faults, where associated circuit breaker means are coupled to each end of each circuit for receiving signals therefrom, the method comprising the step of detecting the existence of high frequency fault signals to enable the tripping of the circuit breaker means. The method of DE-C-543951 is able to ensure that circuit breakers are not unnecessarily operated by transients, for example, by requiring that two different characteristics of a fault occur at substantially the same time. In this known method, a circuit breaker at an individual location is enabled in response to the detection of high frequency oscillations and tripped in response to an overcurrent. However, in this known method the protected circuit is monitored at a number of individual locations at which the associated circuit breakers are provided. This involves total reliance upon locally derived information and therefore does not possess any inherent discrimination properties. Therefore there is a high risk of unnecessary shut-downs occurring. Because of this, extremely high voltage (EHV) transmission systems, i.e. operating at voltages in excess of 150 KV, are generally provided with a unit type protection system in which monitoring equipment with an associated circuit breaker is provided at each end of a transmission line. A communication channel is provided to link the monitoring equipment at each end of the line such that the circuit breakers are tripped by information derived from more than one location. This system, therefore, has a high inherent capacity to discriminate between fault conditions, and in particular to distinguish between faults internal to the line, which require its isolation, and faults in neighbouring lines, which do not require the subject line to be shut-down. However, the communication equipment itself needs to be reliable and secure, and it is therefore expensive to provide and to install. Furthermore, careful monitoring of the communication equipment itself is additionally required. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for protecting transmission circuits against faults which provides good discrimination without the need for communication links. According to the present invention, a method of protecting a transmission system against faults as defined above is characterised in that to provide fault discrimination, the method further comprises the steps of generating locative signals in response to a fault to indicate the location of that fault relative to a predetermined point, determining if the high frequency fault signals are within a predetermined frequency band, and causing discriminating means to output a fault signal to trip the circuit breaker means only when in receipt both of locative signals and of a determination that signals within the predetermined frequency band exist, where the transmission system comprises detector means for generating the locative signals associated with each end of each circuit, each said detector means also being coupled to receive high frequency fault signals from an adjacent circuit, the method further comprising the steps of causing each detector means to generate locative signals by comparing the high frequency fault signals received from two adjacent circuits. The present invention utilises the high frequency noise invariably generated by a fault to aid in the discrimination of faults. It is well known that faults produce wideband noise, but previously this noise has been considered as a nuisance, and even a problem, because it can interfere with the communications by the previously necessary communication equipment. The invention also extends to a method as defined above where the transmission system includes respective discriminating means associated with each circuit breaker means, the method comprising the step of tuning each discriminating means to signals within the predetermined frequency band. Preferably, each discriminating means is arranged to be conditioned by the locative signals it receives. In one embodiment, the method further comprises the step of applying the locative signals generated by each detector means to the discriminating means coupled to the end of the circuit with which the detector means is associated. In an embodiment, the or each discriminating means is coupled to a transmission circuit which includes three lines carrying the three phases of one supply. The signals received by the discriminating means from the three phases are combined, and the discriminating means is caused to output a fault signal only when one or more preselected locative signals are received within a time period in which the combined received signals are detected to have a frequency within said predetermined frequency band. In this respect, the received signals may be combined by summation in accordance with the formula n,- 2n, n,or k,o,-k. Although the fault induced noise is generally wideband, it is preferred to be responsive to frequencies within a narrow band of high frequencies. The lowest frequency of the band will be at least 50 Hz, and preferably the band will be centred on a preselected centre frequency within the range 50 Hz to 500 kHz. In one embodiment, the predetermined frequency band is 300 ± 5 kHz. Preferably, the locative signals are arranged to indicate whether a fault is forward of, or reverse of, said predetermined point. According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided apparatus for protecting a transmission circuit against faults comprising circuit breaker means in the transmission circuit which are enabled to trip upon the detection of the existence of high frequency fault signals, characterised in that the apparatus further comprises first, bandwidth limited, detector means coupled to said transmission circuit to detect the existence of fault signals within a predetermined frequency band, second detector means associated with said transmission circuit and arranged to generate locative signals in response to the occurrence of faults, the locative signals indicating the location of a fault relative to a predetermined point, and discriminating means coupled to said first and second detector means, said discrimination means being arranged to output a fault signal to trip the circuit breaker means only when in receipt both of one or more selected locative signals and of signals from said first detector means determining the existence of signals within the predetermined frequency band, and wherein said second detector means is coupled to its associated transmission circuit and to an adjacent transmission circuit, and said second detector means further comprises means for comparing high frequency fault signals from the two adjacent circuits and generating locative signals in response to the comparison. Preferably, said discriminating means comprises a tuned circuit having an output applied to a level detector, and wherein the discriminating means further comprises logic means arranged to receive the output of the said level detector and said locative signals and to generate said fault signal when appropriate. In a preferred embodiment, said tuned circuit is a band pass filter tuned to a centre frequency of 300 kHz ± 5 kHz. In one embodiment, the second detector means comprises one or more directional detectors each arranged to generate locative signals indicating whether a fault is forward of, or reverse of, said predetermined point. Preferably, said first detector means comprises a first tuned circuit coupled to the associated transmission circuit and a second tuned circuit coupled to the adjacent transmission circuit, said first and second tuned circuits both being coupled to said comparing means and both being tuned to said predetermined frequency band, and wherein said first detector means further comprises attenuator means coupling said first and second tuned circuits. The first detector means may comprise a stack tuning circuit coupled to said transmission circuit. For example, the stack tuning circuit may include a coupling capacitance of a capacitance voltage transformer which is also coupled to the transmission circuit. This stack tuning circuit may be arranged as a band pass filter which is tuned to approximate to a short circuit to signals within said predetermined frequency band. Alternatively, the stack tuning circuit may be arranged to approximate to an open circuit to frequencies within said predetermined frequency band. In an embodiment, the said stack tuning circuit comprises a parallel combination of a capacitance, an inductor, and a switch, which combination is coupled in series with a high voltage capacitance, and further comprising means for enabling selective locative signals to alter the position of said switch. Preferably, the high voltage capacitance is the stack capacitor of a capacitor voltage transformer connected to said transmission circuit. Conveniently, the stack tuning circuit is tuned to a frequency of 300 ± 5 kHz. The invention also extends to apparatus for protecting transmission systems comprising a plurality of transmission circuits, each end of each circuit being provided with apparatus for detecting and discriminating faults as defined above. Generally, the or each transmission circuit comprises the three lines of a three phase supply, and the or each discriminating means is coupled to the three lines of a respective circuit by way of summation means and a respective stack tuning circuit coupled to each said line. Embodiments of the present invention will hereinafter be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which; Figure 1 shows schematically a method of the invention for detecting and discriminating faults on a transmission line, Figure 2 shows one embodiment of a tuning circuit implementing the switches shown in Figure 1, Figure 3 shows the input impedances of the circuit of Figure 2 relative to a normalised frequency, Figure 4 shows schematically a discriminating circuit for generating a trip signal, Figure 5 illustrates the operation of the circuit of Figure 4, Figure 6 illustrates the operation of the circuit of Figure 4 under particular conditions, Figure 7 illustrates an alternative mode of operation of the circuit of Figure 4, Figure 8 illustrates the use of line trap circuits, Figure 9 shows a line trap circuit and its frequency response, Figure 10 shows schematically a distribution feeder protected by apparatus of the invention, Figure 11 shows an embodiment of a detecting and locating circuit for the apparatus of Figure 10, Figure 12 shows the voltage transfer characteristic of a tuned circuit of the circuit of Figure 11, Figure 13 shows an embodiment of a discriminating circuit of the apparatus of Figure 10, and Figures 14 and 15 show the waveforms of discriminating circuits of the apparatus of Figure 10 illustrating the discrimination between differently located faults. Figure 1 illustrates schematically the basic principles of the present invention for detecting and discriminating faults in transmission systems. Figure 1 shows one protected circuit of the system, for example, a transmission line 2 of the transmission system. In known manner, a respective circuit breaker 4 is provided at each end of the line 2 so that the line can be isolated from the transmission system by tripping the two circuit breakers 4. Of course, it is important to ensure that the line 2 is not isolated without good reason. In known manner, each end of the protected line 2 is coupled to additional lines (not shown) which are similarly protected. In practice, the protected line 2 may be a power line of an extremely high voltage (EHV) transmission system, extending between two transformer substations, and carrying voltages in excess of 150 kV at power frequency, for example at 50 or 60 Hz. The length of each power line 2 will depend upon the particular power system involved, but could for example, be in the range 20km to 600km. At each of its ends S and R, the protected line 2 is provided with a high speed directional detector DD. Such detectors are known and generate locative signals upon the occurrence of faults. The directional detectors DD illustrated are used to indicate whether a fault occurring is in the forward or reverse direction relative to the respective detector. The forward and reverse direction for each detector DD is indicated on Figure 1. It will be seen that at each end of the line 2 there is also provided a respective switch S S and S R for coupling the protected line to earth or to a respective discriminating circuit D S , D R . The switches S S and S R are hypothetical switches, being implemented, as will be described below, by tuned circuits which also act as detector means to detect the existence of signals in the protected line having a frequency within a predetermined frequency band. The switches S S and S R are arranged to present either a short circuit or an open circuit to any signals having a frequency within the predetermined frequency band. In this respect, it has been discovered that whatever the fault which arises on high voltage power lines, there is always arcing and/or discharging caused which induces high frequency noise. Generally, the noise signals produced by faults are wideband, but the switches S S and S R are generally arranged to present the short circuit or an open circuit to a relatively narrow band of high frequencies. Let us consider initially the operation of the arrangement shown in Figure 1 when the switches S S and S R are normally closed such that they present a short circuit at the frequencies of interest. Let us then consider the operation if a fault F₁ occurs which is external to the protected line 2. When the fault F₁ occurs, the directional detector DD at end S will detect a reverse direction fault and the switch S S will remain normally closed and short any high frequency signals arriving to ground. The directional detector DD at end R will detect a forward direction fault and in response to this is arranged to open the switch S R . However, because the high frequency signal is shorted by the switch S S no high frequency signals are received by the discriminating circuit D R . Let us again consider the operation of Figure 1 where the switches S S and S R are normally closed, but in the case where an internal fault F₂ arises. In this situation each of the directional detectors DD will detect a fault in its forward direction and each will cause its associated switch S S and S R to open. High frequency signals within the predetermined range are therefore received by the discriminating circuits D S and D R which are arranged to generate respective output signals T S and T R as described below. These trip signals T S and T R trip the circuit breakers 4 so that the power line 2 is correctly isolated. Let us now consider the second case, where the switches S S and S R are normally open at the frequencies of interest. In this situation, the directional detectors DD are arranged to alter the state of the switches if they detect a fault in the reverse direction. Thus, the occurrence of the fault F₁ causes the detector at S to output a reverse direction signal to close S S and thereby short the high frequency signals to earth. The high frequency signals are thus inhibited from reaching the switch S R , and hence the discriminating circuit D R . When the internal fault F₂ occurs, both switches S S and S R remain open such that signals within the frequency band of interest are received by the discriminating circuits D S and D R and cause the generation of output trip signals T S and T R . It will thus be seen from the above, that the circuit shown schematically in Figure 1 is capable of both detecting and discriminating faults without communication between the discriminating circuits D S and D R associated with each end of the power line 2 being necessary. Thus, in a simple manner, the method and apparatus described is able to effectively discriminate between internal and external occurring faults. Although faults generally produce wideband noise, it is preferred that the discriminating circuits D S and D R be tuned to a predetermined narrow band. In a preferred embodiment, the discriminating circuits D S and D R , and the switches S S and S R are all tuned to a narrow band of about ± 5 kHz about a centre frequency of 300 kHz. Figure 2 shows one practical implementation of the switches S S and S R . Each circuit as shown in Figure 2 is coupled to one end of the transmission line 2. The arrangement of Figure 2 has the advantage that it utilises existing equipment already coupled to the end of the transmission line. At each end of a transmission line, as 2, a capacitor voltage transformer is commonly provided for coupling transformed voltages to other devices. Such a capacitor voltage transformer includes a coupling or stack tuning capacitor C C , commonly of the order of 2000 picofarads. It will be seen from Figure 2 that each of the switches S S and S R is synthesized by a circuit which is arranged to tune with the stack tuning capacitance C C . The values of the circuit components of Figure 2 may be chosen either so that the input impedance presented to signals within the predetermined frequency range is small, approximating to the switches S S and S R presenting short circuits at the frequencies of interest. Alternatively, the circuit of Figure 2 can be arranged to present a very large input impedance at the frequencies of interest, to approximate to the switches S S and S R providing an open circuit at the frequencies of interest. It will be seen that the circuit of Figure 2 comprises a parallel arrangement of a capacitor C₂, an inductor L₂ and a switch S connected to the stack tuning capacitor C C by way of a further inductor L₁. A resistance R L shown in series with the inductor L₁ represents the losses in the tuned circuit and is typically less than 50Ω. The parallel connection of the capacitor C₂, the inductor L₂, and the switch S is connected to ground by way of a small resistance R arranged to provide an output voltage V₀, when the switch S is closed, which is proportional to any current within the frequency range of interest shunted to ground. Similarly, when the switch S is open, the output voltage V₀ is proportional to the voltage developed across the inductor L₂ and the resistance R by signals within the frequency range of interest. The band of frequencies over which the circuit of Figure 2 is tuned is chosen for any given value of a stack tuning capacitance C C by suitable choice of the values of the inductors L₁ and L₂ and of the capacitance C₂. If necesary, a further parallel combination of a capacitor and inductor can be connected in series with the resistance R to increase the tuned band and/or the frequency range over which, with the switch S closed, the circuit impedance is minimal. As is made clear above, it is generally preferred to tune the circuit of Figure 2 to a centre frequency of 300 kHz. Of course, if this is rendered unsuitable by other conditions, such as by the frequency of any carrier signalling channels, the circuit components of the tuner of Figure 2 can be accordingly adjusted. Figure 3 shows a typical plot of the input impedance |Zin| of the stack tuning circuit of Figure 2, as viewed from its connection to the line 2, both when the switch S is open and the switch S is closed. The response is shown against frequency, normalised with respect to the centre frequency of 300 kHz. It will be seen from Figure 3, then when the switch S is closed, the tuning circuit presents an input impedance of less than 10Ω over the frequency band 300 ± 5 kHz and thus approximates to a short circuit. When the switch S is open substantially all of the signal within the frequency band is fed by way of a transformer T to the output V₀. In this respect, the series combination of capacitor C C and inductor L₁ is near series resonance at 300 kHz. It will be appreciated that Figure 3 also illustrates the voltage transfer characteristics of the stack tuning circuit of Figure 2 under the two alternative conditions of operation. As made clear above, a respective stack tuning circuit of Figure 2 is used to implement the switches S S and S R . The switches S within the stack tuning circuits are conditioned by way of the signals from the directional detectors. The voltage V₀ at the output of each stack tuning circuit is then coupled to a respective discriminating circuit D S , D R for identifying fault conditions and generating a respective trip signal T S , T R for tripping the relevant circuit breaker 4 as appropriate. It would, of course, be possible to rely upon the discrimination provided by the stack tuning circuit of Figure 2, and thus to provide appropriate detecting and signal generating means directly connected to the output V₀. For example, a threshold detector circuit could be arranged to receive the output V₀ and generate an output signal in response thereto. However, because it is so very important that circuits, for example, power lines of an EHV transmission system, are not isolated without good reason, the further level of discrimination provided by the discriminating circuits D S , D R is preferably supplied. These discriminating circuits D S , D R are arranged to distinguish fault induced noise from external interference for example, radio transmissions. Figure 4 shows one embodiment of a discriminating circuit D S , D R arranged to receive the output voltage V₀ from an associated stack tuning circuit. In fact, the three lines each carrying one phase of a three-phase supply, are each provided with a respective stack tuning circuit, and the output V₀ of each phase is fed to a single discriminating circuit as shown in Figure 4. It will be seen that the three output voltages of the three phases, V 0a , V 0b and V 0c are first of all fed to a summation circuit 6 where they are combined using aerial mode components of propagation. Thus, the three outputs may be combined using a 1,0,-1, or generally a k,0,-k combination. Alternatively, the three outputs can be combined using a 1,-2,1, or more generally a n,-2n,n combination as is illustrated in Figure 4. The n,-2n,n combination is particularly convenient because it causes any common mode signals induced in the power lines from a remote source to be cancelled. Equally importantly, this particular combination also reduces any signals within the predetermined frequency range which are detected in a healthy circuit as a consequence of a fault in an adjacent circuit in double circuit or parallel feeder arrangements. The summation circuit 6 in the circuit of Figure 4 produces an output V S which is fed to a narrow band filter F. Preferably, this filter F is a band pass filter tuned to the same centre frequency as the stack tuning arrangements. Thus, the filter F will admit only those frequency signals which, with the switches S closed, are almost perfectly shorted to ground. Conversely, when the switches S are open, the filter F passes only those frequency components which have suffered the least attenuation in the stack tuning arrangements. With the stack tuning circuits as described above in connection with Figure 2, the narrow band filter of the circuit of Figure 4 will have a bandwidth of the order of 10 kHz. The filter F therefore acts to provide additional tuning. The filtered output voltage V F of the filter F is applied to a level detector circuit 8 which is arranged to produce an output voltage V D where its input voltage V F is above a threshold voltage V T . That is, V D = 1, where V F > V T , and V D = 0, where V F < V T . The threshold voltage V T is set so that any noise in the output signal V F from the filter F, for example, generated by the filter F, the stack tuning arrangement, or the summation circuit, is effectively ignored. The level of the threshold voltage V T can also be set to control the sensitivity of the equipment to system faults. In a practical arrangement, the level of the threshold voltage V T is typically a minimum of 1,000th of the maximum signal level which appears at the output of the filter F. For example, V T has the value of 20mV where the narrow band filter F has a bandwidth of 10 kHz centred on the frequency 300 kHz. The output V D of the level detector 8 is applied to logic means 10. The forward/reverse signals generated by the associated directional detector DD which were used to set the switches S in the stack tuning circuits, are also applied to the logic means 10. The logic means 10 generates a trip signal T S or T R if it receives both a high signal, i.e. V D = 1, from the level detector 8, and an appropriate forward or reverse signal from the associated directional detector DD. Figure 5 shows the waveforms produced by the discriminating circuits D S and D R provided at both ends of a protected line 2, and, in particular shows how the discriminating circuits distinguish between internal and external faults. Figure 5 illustrates the case where the switches S are normally closed so that the stack tuning circuits normally provide a low impedance to signals within the predetermined frequency band. Figure 5a illustrates the situation at the discriminating circuits at both ends S and R of the line 2 when an external fault F₁ as shown in Figure 1 occurs. At time t o , the fault F₁ occurs and high frequency signals are generated which are detected at the end S, as illustrated by the voltage V F passed by the filter F at end S, and by the high level signal V D at end S. Of course, at time t₀ there is no forward signal from the directional detector DD at the end S, and at time t₁ this detector produces a reverse signal. Accordingly, no trip signal T S is generated. The stack tuning arrangement at end S shorts the high frequency signals received to ground so that there is little high frequency received by the stack tuning arrangement at end R, as illustrated by the trace of the voltage V F at end R. The output V D at end R therefore remains at low level, i.e. V D = O. However, the directional detector DD at R, for example at time t₂, detects the fault and generates a forward signal. However, as this forward signal is provided in conjuction with a low level V D output, no trip signal T R is produced. As previously described, the forward signal at end R, opens the switch S in the associated stack tuning circuit. It will be appreciated from Figure 5a that the directional detectors DD react very slowly compared to the stack tuning and discriminating circuits. It is therefore conceivable that the pulse V D could change from one to the zero logic level before a forward signal is generated by the appropriate directional detector DD. This potential problem is averted by pulse stretching any signal V D generated by appropriate operation of the logic means 10. Figure 5b shows the operation when an internal fault F₂ occurs at time t o such that high frequency signals V F are output from the filters F of both discriminating circuits D S and D R . Thus, at both ends S and R the output V D of the level detector changes from 0 to 1. Thereafter, the directional detectors DD at both of the ends S and R will produce forward signals which are used to open the switches S at each end and are also applied to the logic means 10 in the respective discriminating circuits D S and D R . In the situation illustrated in Figure 5b, the fault F₂ is nearer to the end R and thus the forward signal at that end is provided at time t₁, at which time a trip signal T R is generated to trip the circuit breaker 4 at that end of the line 2. Subsequently, at time t₂, the directional detector DD at end S produces a forward signal. As the output V D at the end S still remains at one the trip signal T S is also generated. Thus, the line 2 has been isolated from the transmission system. The application to each discriminating circuit of a signal having a frequency within the range of interest together with a forward signal from the directional detector is sufficient to generate a trip signal for the associated circuit breaker. At first sight therefore, it might appear that the use of the forward signal from the directional detector to additionally open the switch S in the stack tuning circuit is unnecessary. However, where faults occur close to one end of the line 2, the signals transmitted to the remote end would be very small if the local tuning circuit remained an effective short circuit to that signal. By opening the switch S in the local tuning circuit, it is ensured that a sufficient signal is transmitted to the remote end. This case is illustrated in Figure 6 which shows the situation where a fault occurs close to the end S. It will be appreciated from Figure 6 that until the forward signal from the directional detector DD at end S opens the switch S in the associated stack tuning circuit, insufficient high frequency signal is transmitted to the end R to produce an output voltage V D at level one. In all other respects, the operation in Figure 6 is the same as that described above with reference to Figure 5b so that further description thereof is not required. Figure 7 illustrates the mode of operation where the switches in the stack tuning circuit at the ends of the protected line 2 are normally open and are closed to provide an effective short circuit by the production of a reverse signal by the appropriate directional detector DD. Figure 7a shows the situation where an external fault F₁ occurs at time t o , causing high frequency signals to be detected by the discriminating circuit D S as shown by the waveform V F and the production of a one signal at the output V D of the level detector at end S. This high frequency signal is similarly detected at the end R. At time t₁, the directional detector DD at end S produces a reverse signal, which clearly does not cause the discriminating circuit D S to produce any trip signal. However, this reverse signal does close the switch S in the stack tuning circuit at end S such that the high frequency signals are effectively short circuited and are therefore no longer transmitted to the end R, where the output V D changes from one to zero. At time t₂, the directional detector DD at end R produces a forward signal, but as V D is now at zero, no trip signal is generated. Figure 7b, illustrates the operation upon the occurrence of a fault F₂ internal to the protected line 2 where the switches S are normally open. Again, the occurrence of the fault at F₂ causes the high frequency signals V F to be detected at each end and thus the output signals V D to change to the one level. At time t₁ the directional detector DD nearest the fault, that is at end R, produces a forward signal, and hence a trip signal T R is generated. The switch S in the stack tuning circuit at end R remains open circuit. At time t₂, the directional detector DD at end S produces a forward signal which, because of the level one V D signal persisting, causes the trip signal T S to be generated. Figures 7a and 7b again underline the need to ensure that the output voltage V D remains at level one for a time sufficient to allow for the relatively slow operation of the directional detectors. However, it will be apparent from consideration of the operation at end R in Figure 7a, that care needs to be taken in determining the extent to which the pulse V D is stretched. Thus, it will be appreciated from Figure 7a that if the pulse V D at end R is stretched to overlap with the forward signal subsequently provided by the directional detector, an eroneous signal T R would be generated. This of course, compromises the security of the scheme. In general, the mode of operation in which the stack tuning circuits are operated with their switches S normally closed, that is in the short circuit condition, provides the highest levels of security and dependability in practical operations. As has been made clear above, the centre frequency to which the stack tuning circuit and the narrow band filter are tuned, can be chosen as required. However, care must be taken where the bus bar to ground capacitance in a sub-station approaches a value at which its reactance at the chosen frequencies corresponds to a shunt. Figure 8 schematically illustrates the situation which could arise where a large number of lines are terminated at a particular bus bar B which produces a bus bar to ground capacitance of the order of 0.2 µF. At a centre frequency of the order of 300 kHz, such a capacitance corresponds to a shunt. It is evident then, that at a relatively high centre frequency, for example 300 kHz, the line can be effectively shorted at its ends by an impedance which is less than the stack tuning impedance when this is switched to its "short circuit mode". Of course, this would destroy the discrimination of the circuit of Figures 2 and 4. Therefore in choosing the centre frequency, the bus bar capacitive reactance must be considered. Ideally, the capacitive reactance should be at least of the order of 3 times the impedance of the stack tuning circuits when operating in the short circuit mode. Where the choice of centre frequency is limited and the shunt reactance is unduly low, it is possible to apply line trap circuits 14. An example of a line trap circuit, which is conventional, is shown in Figure 9a. The circuit shown in Figure 9a effectively presents an impedance over a predetermined frequency band, which approximates closely to the line characteristic or surge impedance. The frequency response of the line trap circuit at Figure 9a is shown in Figure 9b plotted against frequency normalised with respect to the centre frequency. The bus bar capacitive reactance is relatively low so that for most practical purposes the line should be ideally terminated by line traps. At the frequencies of interest, the line trap would commonly present a resistance of the order of 300Ω and this is sufficient to overcome any discrimination problems which may be caused when there is a restriction on the choice of centre frequencies. It is also possible to provide means to modulate the high frequency signals to avoid problems when the choice of centre frequency is restricted, and/or to aid fault detection. For example, modulation could be simply achieved by causing the periodic opening and closing of the switches S in the stack tuning circuits. Figures 10 to 15 illustrate a further embodiment of the invention which is particularly useful for detecting and discriminating faults in lower voltage distribution systems, for example, having power lines carrying voltages of the order of 11kV. Figure 10 shows schematically a distribution feeder which is divided into a number of individual protected lines 102. As previously, a circuit breaker 104 is provided at each end of each line 102 so that the line can be isolated from the distribution feeder. A number of detecting and locating circuits DL, are spaced along the distribution feeder such that a respective locating circuit DL is provided at each end of each protected line 102. Of course, it will be appreciated that each locating circuit DL receives signals from the two lines 102 with which it is connected. The detecting and locating circuits DL are tuned to a relatively narrow band of frequencies, even though, as described above, a fault in the system generally produces wideband noise. The centre frequency is preferably in the range 50Hz to 500kHz, a value of 300kHz again being typical, and the band may be about ± 5kHz about that centre frequency. Each locating circuit DL has two outputs, each connected to a respective discriminator circuit DDD. The locating circuits DL are responsive to the narrow band frequencies of interest and their output signals indicate whether a fault is present. However, a trip signal T F is only generated when the indication of the presence of a fault is accompanied by an appropriate locative signal. In this respect, each discriminator circuit DDD is arranged to generate locative signals to indicate the location of a fault from the two outputs received from the respective locating circuit DL. In the earlier embodiments, a switch was provided at each end of each line 2 to prevent high frequency signals at one end of the line reaching the other end of the line. Such switches are not provided in the embodiment of Figure 10. The switches are not needed because, as we shall see, the frequencies of interest on the line are attenuated by the detecting and locating circuits DL. Figure 11 shows one practical implementation of a detecting and locating circuit DL connected at one input terminal X to a downstream protected line 102, and at a second input terminal Y to an upstream protected line 102. These input terminals X and Y are connected by a line trap circuit 140 which has the same, substantially conventional configuration, as the line trap circuit 14 of Figures 8 and 9. The line trap circuit 140 is nominally tuned to the centre frequency fc chosen, for example, to 300kHz, and typically has an impedance of about 10Ro at that frequency, where Ro is the line surge impedance. Its frequency response, normalised with respect to the centre frequency will have a similar shape to that of Figure 9b, except that its impedance at the centre frequency will approximate to ten times the surge impedance, rather than approximately equal to it as previously. Each side of the line trap circuit 140 is connected to a non-switched stack tuned circuit comprising a series arrangement of a capacitor Csx, Csy, and an inductor Lsx, Lsy. The output voltage Vox, Voy is taken across a respective series resistor Rox, Roy and fed to the output by way of a respective isolation transformer T1, T2. Each tuned circuit is arranged to have its minimum impedance at the centre frequency fc, and this minimum impedance is substantially equal to the line surge impedance Ro. The voltage transfer characteristic of each stack tuner circuit normalised with respect to the centre frequency is illustrated in Figure 12. Let us consider the operation of the system of Figure 10 by looking at the operation of the detecting and locating circuit DL₂ when faults occur at locations F₁ and F₂ illustrated in Figure 10. Firstly, consider the operation if a fault F₂ occurs which is external to the two protected lines 102 directly connected to the locating circuit DL₂. When the fault F₂ occurs, high frequency signals are impressed on the line at that point. These signals arrive at the locating circuit DL₃ and output signals Vox₃ and Voy₃ are applied to the discriminator circuit DDD₃. We will see later, that in this situation, the discriminator circuit DDD₃ will output a trip signal T F . The high frequency signals arriving at the locating circuit DL₃ are fed towards the locating circuit DL₂ but are attenuated by the line trap circuit 140. For example, the level of the in-band signals at terminal X₃ with the particular circuit parameters suggested will be approximately (1/21)th of the original signal level at terminal Y₃. The level of the in-band signals arriving at the locating circuit DL₂ is therefore relatively low and the respective discriminator circuit DDD₂ is arranged not to output trip signals in response to such low level signals . If an internal fault F₁ occurs, the whole of the high frequency signal arrives at both the locating circuits DL₂ and DL₃ and their discriminators DDD₂ and DDD₃ are arranged to output trip signals. However, these signals are attenuated by the line trap circuits 140 of the two locating circuits DL₂ and DL₃ such that only low level high frequency signals are received elsewhere along the line. It will be apparent from the above, that the detecting and locating circuits DL are responsive to the existence of in-band signals to detect the occurrence of a fault. Furthermore, and as previously, the discriminating circuits DDD also consider the level of the in-band signal as a further degree of discrimination in establishing the existence of a fault. However, rather than using separate direction detectors to produce location information, as previously, the arrangement of Figures 10 and 11 also utilises the level of the in-band signal to provide locative signals. As will be seen below, each locating circuit DL compares the level of the signals on each of its input terminals to establish the direction of the fault. Figure 13 shows an embodiment of a discriminator circuit DDD arranged to receive the output voltages Vox and Voy from an associated detecting and locating circuit DL. In fact the three lines each carrying one phase of a three-phase supply, are each provided with a respective detecting and locating circuit DL and the outputs Vox and Voy of each phase are fed to a single discriminator circuit as shown in Figure 13. It will be seen that the three output voltages Voxa, Voxb, Voxc, of the three phases at one side of the locating circuit DL are first of all fed to a summation circuit 106x where they are combined using aerial mode components of propagation. Thus, the three outputs may be combined using a 1,0,-1, or generally a k,0,-k combination. Alternatively, the three outputs can be combined using a 1,-2,1, or more generally a n,-2n,n combination as is illustrated in Figure 13. The n,-2n,n combination is particularly convenient because it causes any common mode signals induced in the power lines from a remote source to be cancelled. Equally importantly, this particular combination also reduces any signals within the predetermined frequency range which are detected in a healthy circuit as a consequence of a fault in an adjacent circuit in double circuit or parallel feeder arrangements. The summation circuit 106x in the circuit of Figure 13 produces an output Vsx which is fed to a narrow band filter F x . Preferably, this filter F x is a band pass filter tuned to the same centre frequency as the stack tuning arrangements. Thus, the filter F x will pass only those frequency signals which are in-band. Preferably, the narrow band filter F x has a bandwidth of the order of 10kHz and therefore acts to provide additional tuning. The filtered output voltage V Fx of the filter F x is applied to a level detector circuit 108x which is arranged to produce an output voltage V zx where its input voltage V Fx is above a threshold voltage V T . That is, V zx = 1, where V Fx > V T , and V zx = 0, where V Fx < V T . The threshold voltage V T is set so that any noise in the output signal V Fx from the filter F x , for example, generated by the filter F x , the stack tuning arrangement, or the summation circuit, is effectively ignored. The level of the threshold voltage V T can also be set to control the sensitivity of the equipment to system faults. In a practical arrangement, the level of the threshold voltage V T is typically a minimum of 1,000th of the maximum signal level which appears at the output of the filter F x . For example, V T has the value of 20mV where the narrow band filter F x has a bandwidth of 10 kHz centred on the frequency 300 kHz. It will be seen that the three output voltages Voya, Voyb, Voyc of the three phases at the other side of the locating circuit DL are treated in substantially exactly the same manner as described above with reference to voltages Voxa, Voxb, Voxc. Thus, the voltages Voya, Voyb, Voyc are summed by a summation circuit 106y, the summed output is filtered by a narrow band filter F y and then the filtered output signal V Fy is applied to a level detector circuit 108y such that comparison with a threshold voltage V T determines the output signal V zy . The outputs V zx and V zy of the level detectors 108 are applied to logic means 110. Locative information signals, generated by the discriminator circuit DDD are also applied to the logic means 110. The logic means 110 generates a trip signal T F if it receives both a high signal, i.e. V zx or V zy = 1, from a level detector 108, and an appropriate locative information signal. It will be seen from Figure 13 that the two output signals V Fx and V Fy from the narrow band filters F x and F y are fed to a directional decision logic circuit 112. It will be appreciated that the level of these signals will have been determined in dependence upon the location of the fault. For example, for the locating circuit DL₂, if the internal fault F₁ occurs upstream the whole high frequency response will appear at the input terminal Y₂, whilst the line trap circuit 140 will attenuate the input signal at the terminal X₂. This means that the output signal Voy will be very much greater than the output signal Vox, probably by an order of 1:21. Similarly the signal V Fx output from the narrow band filter F x will be very much smaller than the signal V Fy . The directional decision logic circuit 112 compares the two signals V Fx and V Fy . If V Fy is greater than V Fx , as in this case, a one is produced on the output V DU to indicate the location of the fault is upstream. Similarly, if V Fx is greater than V Fy a one appears on the output V DD to indicate a downstream fault. The fault location signals V DU and V DD are applied to the logic means 110 which is arranged to produce a trip signal T F only if a one on V DU (upstream fault) coincides with a one on V zy or a one on V DD (downstream fault) coincides with a one on V zx . Figure 14 shows the waveforms of the discriminator circuits DDD₁, DDD₂ and DDD₃ for the fault F₁ occurring between terminals X₃ and Y₂ (Figure 10). These waveforms indicate how internal and external faults are discriminated. Figure 14b shows the waveforms at discriminator circuit DDD₂ which is associated with locating circuit DL₂ to which the fault F₁ is internal and upstream. When the fault F₁ occurs high frequency signals are generated and are passed substantially without attenuation by the upstream side of discriminator circuit DDD₂ such that a high level, in-band signal V sy is applied to the narrow band filter F y . The high frequency signals are attenuated by the line trap circuit of discriminator circuit DDD₂ such that the level of the signal V sx applied to its filter F x is less than the level of V sy . Accordingly, the output of the direction decision logic circuit 112 is a low on V DD but a high on V DU as illustrated. The high level signal V sy is applied by the filter F y to the level detector 108y whose output V zy will thus be high, whilst the output V zx of level detector 108x is low, again as shown in Figure 14b. The high signals V DU and V zy applied to the logic means 110 cause a trip signal T F to be produced. Similarly, as shown in Figure 14c, the internal, downstream fault F₁ causes a high level signal V sx and an attenuated signal Vsy to be received by the discriminator circuit DDD₃. It will be appreciated that these signals cause V DD and Vzx to go high, so that again a trip signal T F is generated. The discriminator circuit DDD₁ receives attenuated high frequency signals V sx and V sy as shown in Figure 14a such that neither V zx nor V zy goes high and such that no trip signal T F is produced. However, it will be appreciated that as the high frequency signals have been further attenuated by the line trap circuit of the locating circuit DL₁, V sy is greater than V sx such that V DU goes high to indicate an upstream fault. Figures 15a, 15b, 15c show the waveforms at discriminator circuits DDD₁, DDD₂ and DDD₃ respectively for the fault F₂ occurring upstream of terminal Y₃. Figure 15 shows graphically that whilst every discriminator circuit is able to recognise that the fault is upstream, only the discriminator circuit DDD₃, to which the fault F₂ is internal, outputs a trip signal because there is not a sufficient level in any of the high frequency signals applied to the discriminator circuits DDD₁ and DDD₂ to produce a high output from their level detectors 108x or 108y. Figure 15 also illustrates the progressive attenuation of the high frequency signal as it travels through the protected lines 102 and the detecting and locating circuits DL₃ to DL₁. For simplicity Figure 10 shows a configuration of a distribution feeder in which a circuit breaker 104 is provided at each end of each protected line 102. However, in some distribution systems breakers are not necessarily present at regular intervals. In this case, the invention may be used to indicate the location of faults rather than to isolate faulty lines. Furthermore, it will be appreciated that the distribution system may have other configurations to that shown in Figure 10. For example, line taps, spurs and the like may be provided. Of course, appropriate detecting and locating circuits DL may still be associated with the individual lines of the distribution system. In Figure 11, the output voltage Vox, Voy is shown taken across a series resistor. It would, of course, be possible to derive the output voltage across an inductor alone, or across a circuit including an inductor and/or a resistor. Similarly, the derivation of the output voltage in the circuit of Figure 2 may be chosen as required. In the embodiments specifically described with respect to EHV transmission systems, the stack tuning circuits utilise the stack tuning capacitor which already exists in the capacitor voltage transformer commonly provided at the end of a transmission line. This is advantageous because of the problems of providing a capacitor with a sufficiently high capacitance for use at the transmission line voltages. Such problems do not arise at most distribution system voltages. Here it is possible to use a directly connected capacitor for the capacitors Csx and Csy of Figure 11 or a concentric capacitor separated from the high voltage conductor of the protected line by a suitable insulating dielectric, for example, a polymeric insulating material. The invention has been described above with reference to the discrimination of faults in EHV transmission systems, and in distribution systems, and clearly the invention has general applicability to all transmission and distribution systems. In addition, the invention is generally applicable to any electrical system where faults generate signals having frequencies within a predetermined band, and in the claims and in the preamble to the specification the terms "transmission circuit" and "transmission system" are used to refer generally to electrical circuits and systems in which high frequency faults are generated. It will be appreciated that modifications and variations can be made to the invention as described above within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims: A method of protecting a transmission system including a number of transmission circuits (2; 102) against faults, where associated circuit breaker means (4; 104) are coupled to each end of each circuit for receiving signals therefrom, the method comprising the step of detecting the existence of high frequency fault signals to enable the tripping of the circuit breaker means (4; 104), characterised in that, to provide fault discrimination, the method further comprises the steps of generating locative signals in response to a fault (F₁, F₂) to indicate the location of that fault relative to a predetermined point, determining if the high frequency fault signals are within a predetermined frequency band, and causing discriminating means (D S , D R ; DDD) to output a fault signal (T S , T R ; T F ) to trip the circuit breaker means (4; 104) only when in receipt both of locative signals and of a determination that signals within the predetermined frequency band exist, where the transmission system comprises detector means (DD;DL) for generating the locative signals associated with each end of each circuit, each said detector means also being coupled to receive high frequency fault signals from an adjacent circuit (102), the method further comprising the steps of causing each detector means (DL) to generate locative signals by comparing the high frequency fault signals received from two adjacent circuits. A method as claimed in Claim 1, where the transmission system includes respective discriminating means (D S , D R ; DDD) associated with each circuit breaker means (4; 104), the method comprising the step of tuning each discriminating means to signals within the predetermined frequency band. A method as claimed in Claim 2, further comprising the step of conditioning each discriminating means (D S , D R ; DDD) by the locative signals it receives. A method as claimed in Claim 2 or 3, further comprising the step of applying the locative signals generated by each detector means to the discriminating means (D S , D R ; DDD) coupled to the end of the circuit with which the detector means is associated. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the or each discriminating means (D S , D R ; DDD) is coupled to a transmission circuit which includes three lines carrying the three phases of one supply. A method as claimed in Claim 5, wherein the signals received by the discriminating means (D S , D R ; DDD) from the three phases are combined, and wherein the discriminating means is caused to output a fault signal only when one or more preselected locative signals are received within a time period in which the combined received signals are detected to have a frequency within said predetermined frequency band. A method as claimed in Claim 6, wherein the received signals are combined by summation in accordance with the formula k,o,-k. A method as claimed in Claim 6, wherein the received signals are combined by summation in accordance with the formula n,- 2n,n. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the predetermined frequency band is a high frequency band whose lowest frequency is at least 50 Hz. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the predetermined frequency band is a narrow band range centred on a preselected centre frequency. A method as claimed in Claim 10, wherein the preselected centre frequency is within the range 50Hz to 500 kHz and/or the predetermined frequency band is 300 kHz ± 5 kHz. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the locative signals are arranged to indicate whether a fault is forward of, or reverse of, said predetermined point. Apparatus for protecting a transmission circuit against faults comprising circuit breaker means (4; 104) in the transmission circuit which are enabled to trip upon the detection of the existence of high frequency fault signals, characterised in that the apparatus further comprises first, bandwidth limited, detector means (S S , S R ; D L ) coupled to said transmission circuit to detect the existence of fault signals within a predetermined frequency band, second detector means (DD; DL) associated with said transmission circuit and arranged to generate locative signals in response to the occurrence of faults, the locative signals indicating the location of a fault relative to a predetermined point, and discriminating means (D S , D R ; DDD) coupled to said first and second detector means, said discrimination means being arranged to output a fault signal (T S , T R ; T F ) to trip the circuit breaker means (4; 104) only when in receipt both of one or more selected locative signals and of signals from said first detector means determining the existence of signals within the predetermined frequency band, and wherein said second detector means is coupled to its associated transmission circuit and to an adjacent transmission circuit, and said second detector means further comprises means (112) for comparing high frequency fault signals from the two adjacent circuits and generating locative signals in response to the comparison. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 13, wherein said discriminating means comprises a tuned circuit (F) having an output applied to a level detector (8; 108), and wherein the discriminating means further comprises logic means (10; 110) arranged to receive the output of said level detector and said locative signals and to generate said fault signal when appropriate. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 14, wherein said tuned circuit is a band pass filter (F). Apparatus as claimed in any of Claims 13 to 15, wherein said second detector means comprises one or more directional detectors (DD) each arranged to generate locative signals indicating whether a fault is forward of, or reverse of, said predetermined point. Apparatus as claimed in any of Claims 13 to 16, wherein said first detector means (DL) comprises a first tuned circuit (C S , L S , R O ) coupled to the associated transmission circuit and a second tuned circuit (C S , L S , R O ) coupled to the adjacent transmission circuit, said first and second tuned circuits both being coupled to said comparing means (112) and both being tuned to said predetermined frequency band, and wherein said first detector means further comprises attenuator means (140) coupling said first and second tuned circuits. Apparatus as claimed in any of Claims 13 to 17, wherein said first detector means (D S , D R ; DL) comprises a stack tuning circuit coupled to said transmission circuit. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 18, wherein said stack tuning circuit includes a coupling capacitance (C C ) of a capacitance voltage transformer which is also coupled to the transmission circuit. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 18 or 19, wherein said stack tuning circuit is arranged as a band pass filter which is tuned to approximate to a short circuit to signals within said predetermined frequency band. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 18 or 19, wherein said stack tuning circuit is arranged to approximate to an open circuit to frequencies within said predetermined frequency band. Apparatus as claimed in any of Claims 18 to 21, wherein said stack tuning circuit comprises a parallel combination of a capacitance (C₂), an inductor (L₂), and a switch (S), which combination is coupled in series with a high voltage capacitance (C C ), and further comprising means (DD) for enabling selected locative signals to alter the position of said switch. Apparatus for protecting transmission systems comprising a plurality of transmission circuits, each end of each circuit being provided with apparatus for protecting against faults as claimed in any of Claims 13 to 22. Apparatus as claimed in any of Claims 13 to 23, wherein the or each transmission circuit comprises the three lines of a three phase supply, and wherein the or each discriminating means is coupled to the three lines of a respective circuit by way of summation means (6; 106) and a respective first detector means coupled to each said line.

Inventors: JOHNS ALLAN THOMAS, JOHNS, ALLAN THOMAS
Applicants: BRITISH TECH GROUP, BRITISH TECHNOLOGY GROUP LIMITED
Application year: 1988
Main classification: H02H7
IPC codes: H02H1, H04B3, H02H7