Induction heating and melting systems having improved induction coils

Abstract: Improved electric induction heating apparatus wherein the coil has at least once winding of special low loss conductor or two or more windings which are electrically connected in parallel. The two or more windings can be wound simultaneously one on top of the other and/or disposed radially one outside of the other. The coil windings can be wound tightly one on the other or spaced apart radially providing an air gap therebetween for circulating cooling air therethrough. The conductor for the two or more windings may be a low loss conductor and, if desired, provided with a fluid flow path for circulating cooling fluid therethrough. The parallel windings can be forced to carry equal current by at least one of current balancing transfor­ mers, transposition of the windings, and appropriately choosing the number of turns of each coil layer. A split ring bus is disclosed located at each end of the coil and laminated steel yokes are disposed about the coil.

Description: This invention relates to improvements in induction heating and melting systems and more particularly to improvements in the coils or inductors in such systems. With recent progress in the electronics of power control, induction heating has become an important technique in such applications as melting, reheating before forming and localized heat treatment. Some areas still remain, however, where induction heating has not seen the same development because of inadequate or poorly performing equipment, lack of experience, or unexpressed requirements. Today, induction heating has seen important progress in the development of new electrical power supplies, especially static power converters. On the other hand, the heating inductor has remained the classic coil assembly and has seen no improvements in its design. The coils or inductors in induction heating are required to produce alternating magnetic fields of very large intensities (in the range 80,000 to 300,000 amperes turns per metre). In the present state of the art almost all induction heating coils are made of hollow copper conductors, which are wound into a single layer solenoidal coil. Because the coil consists of only a single layer of rather large conductor, the number of turns must be small and therefore the current in each turn must be very high to achieve the field intensities required. This gives rise to very large I²R losses in the reactor and therefore the efficiency with which energy is transferred from the coil to the billet being heated is low (typically in the range of 30 to 70 percent depending upon the material being heated and the frequency being used). The addition of a second layer of hollow conductors forming a second solenoid concentric with the first and connected in series with it, allows the current in the coil to be reduced to nearly half of its normal value and still maintain the same field intensity at the billet inside the coil. This has the effect of reducing the I²R losses in the coil but, unfortunately, the inner layer of hollow copper conductors is heated by the induced currents caused by the field of the outer layer and the resulting losses in the coil are substantially the same as though a single layer coil were used. The addition of even more layers can in fact make the resulting total coil loss larger than it would be for the single layer coil which produces the same magnetic field intensity. It has long been the goal of induction heating designers to increase the efficiency of their installations and a specific goal has been to devise a method of using multiple layers in a coil to achieve this end. One solution has been described by I.A. Harvey in a paper entitled "a method of improving the energy transfer in induction heating process and its application in a 1 MW billet heater", published in 1977 in IEE Conference Publication 149: Electricity for Materials Processing and Conservation pp. 16-20. The method utilizes a disc wound transformer type coil made from strip type conductors arranged so that the strips are thin in the radial direction and long in the axial direction of the coil and the whole assembly is immersed in water for cooling. This has the effect of reducing the eddy losses near the mid-plane of the coil, where the flux is axial and faces the thin side of the strips but it does not reduce the losses near the end of the coils where a significant portion of the magnetic field is radial. Coils of this construction perform reasonably well at low frequencies but perform very poorly at moderate and high frequencies where the eddy losses are still very substantial. A further disadvantage is the necessity to place all of the conductors in series giving rise to a very high coil voltage. This is particularly troublesome since the insulated coil is immersed in water. Another proposal was presented in a paper presented at the Electroheat Congress in Stockholm in June 1980 entitled "Technical Innovation in the Induction Reheating of Billets Wires and Strips", by M. Coevet, J. Heurten, J. Nun and E. Poirout, which discloses an induction heating coil wound using a rectangular conductor which comprises 18 transposed insulated subconductors, 12 of which are thin strips and 6 of which are hollow rectangular copper conductors, the latter being interleaved with the former to cool the conductor. The authors claim an improvement in efficiency when heating aluminum at 50 Hz of 12% (from 42 to 54%) and point out that the use of this special conductor is limited to 400 Hz. A principal object of the present invention is to provide an increase in the efficiency of induction heating systems by providing an inductor arrangement that reduces electrical losses. The invention provides a coil for electric inductive heating apparatus in accordance with Claim 1. In embodiments of the invention the coil is a single or multiple layer, stranded conductor coil in which the current distribution is controlled. In other embodiments, the induction heating coil conductor itself may be of novel design and the arrangement is such that both throughput current losses and eddy losses may be controlled in an arbitrary way. In multiple winding coils the windings are connected in parallel and the current distribution to the windings can be maintained at a predetermined value despite changes in the frequency of the coil supply, despite the changes in load introduced into the coil and in the presence of magnetic yokes surrounding the coil. By means of the system, very low coil losses may be obtained and the voltage between adjacent conductors may be reduced to a small fraction of its normal value by means of voltage grading. An induction heating device provided in accordance with the present invention comprises either a single coil made from a special low-loss, multiple path transposed conductor or a number of parallel connected individual coils either (a) interleaved in a single layer or (b) coaxially disposed providing a number of layers or (c) a combination of (a) and (b) above. The sharing of current among the individual paralleled coils is, in a preferred embodiment, controlled by an automatic current balancing scheme which maintains the pre-determined current division automatically despite changes in the frequency of the supply to the induction heating device, despite changes in the load inside the device, and despite the presence of yokes, if used. The induction heating device may or may not contain a spider type connecting bus at one end connecting the layers of coils in parallel. The conductors forming the individual coils preferrably are made of stranded and transposed subconductors to control eddy losses and special conductors may be used for forced air cooling or for water cooling. In what follows, the various parts of the system will be discussed in order beginning with the overall arrangement of the system including the arrangement of the individual coils to form the main coil and the interconnection of these with a current balancing system, the theory of the current balancing system and the construction of the special low loss conductors for either the air-cooled or the liquid-cooled type of induction device and the use of a heat sink winding to control the thermal gradient across the refractory and to protect the coil winding from the heat flux of the load. The invention is illustrated by way of example in the accompanying drawings wherein: Figure 1 is an oblique partial sectional view of the coil portion in an induction heating apparatus provided in accordance with the present invention; Figure 2 is a top plan view of Figure 1; Figure 3 is an oblique partial schematic view of an induction heating coil of the present invention; Figure 4 is an electrical schematic of the apparatus of Figures 1 and 2; Figure 5 is similar to Figure 4 but with all of the coil layers in parallel; Figure 6 is an electrical schematic of the apparatus of Figure 1 with current balancing means for the paralleled layers of coils; Figures 7, 8 and 9 are electrical schematics illustrating variations of the current balancing; Figure 10 is an electrical schematic illustrating voltage grading in addition to current balancing in an induction heating inductor without use of yokes or spiders; Figures 11 to 24 are views illustrating various low loss conductors for the induction heating inductor of the present invention; and Figure 25 is a partial oblique view in partial section of an induction heating coil and heat sink winding of the present invention. General Arrangement of Subcoils to Form Main Induction Coil Figure 1 shows, in partial cross section, a part of the physical portion of an induction heating apparatus which includes an induction coil 10, provided in accordance with the present invention, with a central billet 20 to be heated thereby. The induction coil 10 is shown as having three coil packages designated respectively 10A, 10B and 10C but any number of packages, i.e. one or more, may be used. The three packages are coaxial and radially spaced and adjacent packages are separated from one another by spacers 30. Each package may consist of a single winding or two or more windings wound simultaneously whereby the conductors i.e. 11A, 11B, are interleaved i.e. a single layer coil. Special conductors, to be described hereinafter, are preferrably used. Each package can consist of one or two or more interwoven identical helical windings all having the same inside and outside diameter and the same number of turns i.e. a single layer. A package may also consist of two or more coaxial coil windingswound one upon the other providing multiple coil layers. The manner of terminating the ends of these individual helices will be discussed hereinafter. Although each package 10A, 10B, etc. is shown as containing two interwoven helices, any number of interwoven helices may be used in any layer and each package may have multiple layers. The billet 20 (which could be solid or liquid, non-magnetic or magnetic and an arbitrary length) is conducting and, if desired, a number of laminated magnetic steel yokes 40 can be provided to carry the return flux outside the coil to prevent this flux from inducing unwanted eddy currents in surrounding structures. It is readily apparent that composite coil 10, which is shown in cross section in Figure 1 and in plan view in Figure 2, comprises 6 separate, magnetically coupled coils. It is now required to connect these coils electrically in parallel in such a manner that each of the coils will carry a pre-determined share of the overall current despite the presence or absence of the billet, despite the frequency of the supply to which the coils are connected and despite the presence or absence of the yokes. This goal may be achieved by a judicious choice of the number of turns used in the various packages in conjunction with a current balancing system which will be described hereinafter. When yokes 40 are present, advantage may be taken of their presence to produce partial turns. The ability to produce partial turns presents an auxiliary way of achieving nearly perfect current balance among the interwoven identical helices within a package and at the same time to produce nearly perfect grading between adjacent conductors in the package throughout the length of the package. This has the result of reducing the voltage stress between adjacent conductors to approximately 1/n where "n" is the number of interwoven helices in the package. The Use of Yokes to Produce Partial Turns Figure 3 diagramatically illustrates a single layer coil, i.e. 10A, but with four interleaved windings instead of only two as illustrated in Figure 1. The four interleaved windings are designated 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D around which are symetrically situated four steel yokes 40. The four coil windings 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D are connected in parallel at the top end via a ring bus 50, which runs outside the yokes. The four coil windings 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D spiral downward in a counterclockwise direction where they terminate at different circumferential positions on the coil i.e. 90° from one another and are connected via a second bus ring 60 to an output line. Coil winding 11A is shown with the top end start of the winding designated as A. Coil windings 11B, 11C and 11D are shown with the top end start of the windings designated B, C and D respectively. The four interwoven coil windings thus carry counterclockwise currents together producing an upward flux in the coil as shown schematically by the arrow X. This flux is captured by the four yokes which each carry one-fourth of the total flux downward as shown schematically by the arrow Y. For the moment, the leakage flux which moves downward outside or between the yokes will be ignored. Ignoring this leakage flux, and assuming a low resistance winding, then points A, B, C and D, corresponding to the beginings of the four interwoven windings, are at the same potential. Now point B' which is on the same winding as point B but a quarter turn later, is at a different potential than point B due to the induced voltage caused by the inner flux over the quarter turn distance. In fact, point B is at a potential which is one quarter of the voltage per turn higher than point B'. Therefore, the potential difference between points A and B' is only a quarter of the turn-to-turn voltage which would result in a single layer coil occupying the same space as the four interwoven windings and containing the same number of turns as each of the interwoven windings. A similar argument may be used to show that the conductor to conductor potential difference all the way down the length of the four interwoven windings will be exactly one-quarter as large as it would be if only a single winding had been used (having four times the pitch) having the same number of turns as each of the interwoven windings. Similarly, if n windings were interwoven at the same time and all fed from a ring type bus symetrically between the n yokes, then the resulting conductor-to-conductor voltage all the way down the length of the layer would be exactly 1/n of the turn-to-turn voltage which would result if a single winding had been used occupying the same length and having the same number of turns as each of the interwoven windings (and having n times the pitch). Thus, the use of a ring bus supply outside the yokes allows the designer to grade the voltage applied to a coil as shown. It is also apparent that, if the termination of n windings at the bottom is also achieved by a ring bus, and furthermore each of the n windings has exactly the same number of turns, then the current in the n interwoven helices must all be identical since each coil winding links with precisely the same flux due to the symmetry with which they are wound. Furthermore, if a circular billet is introduced along the centreline of the coil it will not disturb the symmetry of the n windings, which are all affected in the same manner. Therefore, the n windings will continue to carry equal currents and the voltage between adjacent conductors along the length of the layer will continue to be graded. It should also be apparent that a change in frequency of the supply to the coil will not change either the nearly perfect current balance or the voltage grading. A change in frequency of the supply and/or the introduction of a billet will of course change the effective impedance of the coil, and of each of the interwoven helices and, therefore, the ratio of voltage to current. If the yokes do not capture all of the coil flux, and part of it returns outside the ring bus, then the current balancing and voltage grading will not be perfect. The departure from perfection will be proportional to the percentage of the flux which escapes the yokes. It should also be apparent from the above discussion that the use, in a multilayer coil, of yokes and the ring bus supply described above will permit the use of partial turns in each coil layer to an increment of 1/n of a turn in the case where each coil layer has n interleaved windings. Current Balancing System Although the system described in the preceding section allows for obtaining current balance within the interwoven helices of a layer, it will not suffice to balance the currents between coaxial radially spaced coil layers, especially when the load or frequency is to be changed. The system to be described in this section may be used to achieve whatever balance is desired between coaxially disposed wound coils which are in different layers and may also be used to balance the currents among interwoven helices for the case when yokes are not present. The equivalent circuit of an induction heating coil like that shown in Figure 1, but where the number of layers and the number of interwoven helices per layer is arbitrary, may be represented as shown in Figure 4. In this figure the coil layers are designed 10A, 10B, 10C...10n with the layer n representing the last in any number of layers, and, for the sake of clarity, it is assumed that there is only one helix per layer. The inductances shown represent the self-inductances of the individual windings comprising the overall coil and it is to be understood that all such inductances are mutually coupled. The coil layers have designate thereon current I, voltage V, Resistance R and inductance L with appropriate subscripts for the respective different coil layers. If we now assume that a given sinusoidal current is injected into each of the layers, then the coupled circuit equations for the situation are shown in two equivalent forms as equation 1: and equation 2: where L kk represents a self-inductance of winding k, L ij represents a mutual inductance between windings i and j, L ℓj represents the mutual inductance between the billet 20 and winding j, and where R n represents the resistance of winding n, and R ℓ represents the equivalent resistance of the billet. In equation 2 the symbol λ, with a subscript, represents the total flux linking the subscripted winding. As may be seen in Figure 4 the bottom of all windings are connected in common. Since the current in each layer has been forced to have an arbitrary value, it is readily apparent that the voltage drops across each winding, shown as V j , will not, in general, be equal. Therefore, if the upper terminals of each of the separate windings are all connected together, that is, if the layers are forced to have a common voltage, then it is clear that the currents will not maintain the values originally imposed. Now, if additional voltages ΔV of the appropriate magnitude and phase are injected into each of the windings (see Figure 5) then all of the terminal voltages can be made equal. If the separate windings were now connected in parallel, the voltages will be the same and the currents will not change from their initial values. The required voltages may be injected into the various windings by the use of transformers 70 shown in Figure 6. Assume for simplicity that it is required to have identical currents in each of the layers, the primaries 71 of n identical transformers are connected in series with one line L₁ as shown. The secondary 72 of each of the transformers is connected in series with one of the layers 10A, 10B, 10C, etc., associated therewith, the other end of the secondaries being connected in common as shown by line L₂ and the common point connected in series with the primaries. The turns ratio of each transformer is l:n, that is, the secondaries have n times as many turns as the primaries. If we assume for the moment that the transformers are ideal, then the current in the secondary of each transformer must be exactly l/n times the current in the primary, that is, the current in all of the windings are forced to be the same regardless of whether there was an initial imbalance or not. The current balance occurs because a voltage appears across the terminals of each of the secondaries which is precisely of the right magnitude and phase to make the total voltage across each winding and its transformer exactly the same as that across each of the other windings and its transformer. The voltages appearing on the secondaries cause voltages across the primaries of all the transformers which are smaller by exactly the transformer ratio. It is apparent that the voltages across some of the transformers will be positive and across others will be negative as required to make all winding voltages average out to the same value. In real life the transformers are not ideal and the flux in the core of each transformer requires an exciting current. As is the case in all transformers this exciting current is negligibly small as long as the cores are not driven into saturation. This illustrates an important design criterion for the transformers. They must be designed to carry sufficient flux to give rise to the voltages they are required to produce. In designing the transformers it is necessary, therefore, to know an upper bound on the value of the incremental voltage required to be produced by each transformer but the polarity need not be known. The other design criteria for the transformers is that the winding have sufficient cross-section to carry the rated currents of the windings. Three other embodiments of the invention are shown in Figures 7, 8 and 9. In Figure 7 all of the transformers 70 have a ratio 1:1 and, as may be seen, all of the primary windings 71 are connected in series in a ring. This circuit behaves exactly the same as that shown in Figure 6 and has the obvious advantage that the primary and the secondary windings are identical. Figure 8 shows the simplest embodiment of this invention. A single transformer 70 is shown being used to balance the current in a two winding device. Figure 9 shows a scheme using n-l transfomrers 70 to balance the currents in an n windng system. In this scheme one of the windings is chosen as the reference winding and is connected in series with all of the primaries. This has an obvious advantage over the circuits shown in Figure 6 and 7 of requiring one less transformer. It should be obvious that one need not have all currents equal in the windings. One may obtain a different current in each winding simply by choosing an appropriate ratio for the particular transformer in that winding. This is useful for example to force larger currents in the inner and outer layers of an air core reactor since these two layers are cooled more efficiently that the inner ones. Use of Current Balancing System to Produce Current Balancing and Voltage Grading Simultaneously in a Reactor without Yokes or Spiders It is well known that voltage grading can be produced among a group of interleaved helices in a single layer even when connected in parallel provided that spiders are used at both ends. (See for example Patent No. 3,264,590). The use of spiders to produce both current balancing and voltage grading allows the designer considerably more freedom in his choice of conductor sizes and arrangement in order to achieve an optimum design for a reactor. Figure 10 shows the circuit diagram corresponding to a single layer coil, for example 10A, comprising three interleaved identical windings 11A, 11B and 11C in which the current balancing scheme (transformers 70), combined with two small series reactors 80 and 81, are used to achieve both current balancing and voltage grading among the three interleaved coils, in the presence or absence of a load, despite changes in frequency and in the presence or absence of yokes. It is assumed that the three windings begin at a common point at one end of the coil and end at a common point on the other end of the coil. If the three interleaved coils are now simply connected in parallel, without the special current balancing and grading system proposed, then the voltage between the interleaved coils will not be graded and the currents in the three coils will not, in general, be equal, especially in the presence of an arbitrary load. To provide voltage grading, two small external reactors 80 and 81 are added in series with respective ones of two of the inerleaved coils (shown as coil 11B and 11C respectively, where coils 11B and 11C are adjacent to each other). The small external reactor 80 is chosen so that the voltage drop across it, when rated current flows through coil 11B, is exactly one-third of the turn voltage at the end of the winding. Likewise, external reactor 81 is chosen so that the voltage drop across it is exactly two-thirds of the voltage per turn when coil 11C is carrying its rated current. Thus the voltage drop between points a and b and between points b and c is exactly one-third of the volts per turn, assuming that all three interleaved coils are carrying the same currents. However, the presence of the two external reactors 80 and 81 destroys the symmetry of the three interleaved coils and therefore they will not carry equal currents unless a current balancing scheme is used and forces them to do so. The current balancing scheme, i.e. transformers 70, are installed at the opposite end of the coil and operates in exactly the same manner as described in the previous section. The current balancing system not only forces the currents to be equal in the three interleaved coils but it also ensures that the potential difference between points a¹ and b¹ and also between points b¹ and c¹ is exactly one-third of the volts per turn at the end of the coil. The current balancing system injects exactly the right voltages into the system to ensure that this happens. It follows therefore, that the potential difference between any two adjacent conductors along the length of the coil is always one-third of the volts per turn at that location and, therefore, the voltage is continusously graded along the length of the coil. The current balancing circuit used is only one of several possible ones as discussed in the previous section. The same effect may be achieved if a spider is used at one end of the coil only and a current balancing system is used at the other. In this case the spider itself performs the same function as the added external reactors in the previous case. The use of a spider at one end would of course block off one end of the coil and loads could be introduced at the other end only. A preferred embodiment of the overall induction heating system comprises a multi-layer coil in which the individual layers comprise interwoven helical windings, in which the conductors preferrably are of a special low loss kind as described hereinafter, where the overall current balance among windings in different layers is maintained by the current balancing system described above, where the current balancing among the interwoven helices of a single layer is maintained either by the current balancing system or by the novel ring bus system in conjunction with the yokes described above, and lastly, where voltage grading among interwoven helices of a single layer is provided either by the novel ring bus system described above when yokes are present or by the use of small external reactors in conjunction with the current balancing system as described above when yokes are not present. Low Loss Conductors for Air-Cooled Coils The coils described in the foregoing are preferably wound from low loss conductor cables some embodiments of which are illustrated in figures 11 to 17. Rectangular roll formed cables for the coils may be constructed from a number of circular insulated subconductors (or bunched or transposed subconductors) which are cabled in a unilay construction about a central conductor or temporary mandril and then roll formed to achieve compaction and the required rectangular shape. The rectangular rolled formed cables may be divided into two broad categories: (1) those in which the successive layers of round wires are wound about a central wire of the same size, and (2) those in which the layer (or layers) of round wires are wound about a central mandril which is then withdrawn. Referring to Figure 11 there is illustrated a composite conductor which, for example, may be coil windings 11A and/or 11B and/or 11C referred to with respect to Figure 1, formed by spiralling round conductors 91 about a central conductor 92 in a known manner by use of a winding machine. Successive layers may be spiralled, one such further layer being shown in Figure 12, the direction of spiralling being the same so that the successive layers are nested into each other. Figure 13 shows the composite multi-layer conductor of Figure 12 after it has been passed through a number of rollers to achieve a compacted rectangular cross section. Experience has shown that it is relatively easy to obtain rectangular shapes having aspect ratios of from one to three. The aspect ratio of a cable is the width divided by the height, i.e. w/h. Figure 14 shows a cable wherein a layer of circular conductors 91 have been wound without a center core wire. The conductors are wound around the periphery of a mandril 93 (see Fig. 15) and as they are wound, they are slid off the mandril. The cable of Fig. 15 is passed between press rollers so as to be formed in the flat rectangular cross section shown in Figure 16. Using this method of construction, it is possible to make conductors with rectangular cross sections having aspect ratios very much greater than three. A variant of this type of construction is shown in Figure 17 where a second layer of conductors 91 has been spiralled around a first layer and then roll, formed to compact the cable and give it a rectangular cross section. While coreless wound cable is known as, for example, from the teachings of United States Patent 3,828,120, issued August 6, 1974, and assigned to The Anaconda Company, it was not known or expected beneficial results could be obtained using the same in the coil winding of a reactor. Provided dimensions of the rectangular cables of the type shown in Figure 13 and 17 are not large compared to a penetration depth, then all of the strands will take their proper share of the current. Where the dimensions of these cables are large compared to a penetration depth, the innermost strands will not take their proper share of current. However, cable of the type shown in Figure 16 is such that all strands are perfectly transposed and each strand will take its proper share of the current regardless of the penetration depth and therefore regardless of the frequency. Low Loss Cables for Water-Cooled Coils In the simplest embodiment illustrated in Figures 18 and 19, a plurality of electrical subconductors 101, of solid cross section and preferrably either circular or trapezoidal in cross sectional shape are cabled in unilaid spiral fashion over a hollow, generally circular, cross section cooling tube 102, through which a fluid or liquid coolant such as water, may be circulated. The subconductors 101 are generally metallic and preferably copper or aluminum. The thermal and electrical properties of the cooling tube 102 are critical to the proper operation of induction coil in which the cable is used. On the one hand, the thermal conductivity must be sufficiently large to transfer the I²R losses and eddy losses in the strands under maximum current conditions to the fluid flowing through the cooling tube. On the other hand the electrical conductivity must be sufficiently small to keep the eddy current losses in the cooling tube small. The acceptable levels of the thermal conductivities and electrical conductivities is a complex function of the conductor geometry, the coil geometry, the frequency of the current and the current density in the conductor. However, the levels can be readily established by one knowledgeable in the art. For line frequency operation of even large reactors, for example, #304 stainless steel has acceptable properties. For 10 kHz coils, Teflon has been found to work well. For intermediate frequencies composite cooling tubes, eg. glass-fibre reinforced, carbon-fibre reinforced, or, stainless steel reinforced plastic appear to be suitable. The subconductors 101 are electrically insulated from each other by a coating 103 and the fact that they are cabled in spiral fashion around the cooling tube 102 effectively continuously transposes them so that they share the total current equally. The entire assembly may be coated with an exterior coating layer 104, which acts as an insulation layer and also as a protection against physical damage or abrasion. Coating layer 104 may be applied by winding a filament material or by extruding an insulating thermoplastic or thermosetting material over the assembly. In certain applications, the apparatus size and/or configuration and the frequency of operation may mean that even with an arrangement of subconductors 101 as described hereinabove, the eddy losses in the subconductors are unacceptably large. In such circumstances the subconductors 101 may themselves be subdivided into smaller sub-subconductors 106 as shown in Figure 20. The number and size of the sub-subconductors may be selected to make the eddy curent losses as low as is required, within practical limits. The sub-subconductors 106 may be transposed by bunch cabling or be regular cabling and then by roll forming into trapezoidal segmental shapes either before they are wound over the cooling tube 102 or while they are being wound over the cooling tube 102. In an alternative embodiment, illustrated in Figure 21, a second layer of subconductors 107, is cabled over the first layer before the insulating material 104 is applied. The subconductors in both layers are insulated individually and these subconductors may be further subdivided into insulated strands, as explained above, to further reduce eddy losses. In order to increase the winding factor of the coil, the cable may be made approximately rectangular in cross section as shown in figure 19(a) by winding the conductors 101 over a cooling tube 102 of rectangular cross section. alternatively, as shown in figure 19(b), the conductors 101 may be wound over a circular cooling tube 102 and the resulting cable roll-formed to have a rectangular cross section. A further, more complex embodiment is illustrated in Figure 22, and shows a composite cable 110 comprising seven subcables 111 each of which is fabricated as in Figures 18, 20 or 21. The composite cable 110 is formed by spiralliing six outer subcables, in the conventional way of making cables. The entire assembly may be insulated with a layer 113 of insulating material as hereinbefore described. Where the layer of insulation 113 is used, the layer 104 about each of the subcables may be omitted as each of the subconductors is covered with an insulating layer and consequently layer 104 may be redundant. In order to achieve a better space factor, the subcables 111 may be roll formed to have a segmental cross-section. An alternative form of a composite cable such as that of Figure 22 is shown in Figure 23 and 24. A large flat cable 120, comprising a plurality of subcables 111 (Fig. 18) continuously transposed around the cable without the use of a central core cable, is illustrated. The cable 120 is roll or otherwise formed, after cabling to provide the flat shape. This form of continuous transposition provides an improved space factor and very low eddy losses and can be produced by cabling the subcables 91 around a mandril which is subsequently withdrawn from the composite cable. While references to liquid and more particularly water cooling has been made, it will be appreciated that the principles thereof are equally applicable to vapour gaseous fluid cooling using such fluids as FREON gas as commonly used in refrigeration systems and the like. Arrangement of Induction Heating System In the foregoing there is described a coil arrangement in and for electrical induction heating apparatus. In the simplest form the coil is a single cylindrical unit with two or more coil windings interleaved. Electrically the two windings are connected in parallel. As previously mentioned, any number of coil windings can be used. The two windings in Fig. 1 are designated 11A and 11B in one cylindrical unit referred to as a coil layer which is designated, by way of example, 10C. Additional coil layers may be used with all such layers being coaxial and preferrably of the same axial length. A single coil package may consist of one or more layers with the whole package embedded in a glass reinforced resin providing rigidity to the unit. For convection or forced air cooled units the coil unit, as in Fig. 1, i.e. coil packages 10A, 10B and 10C are radially spaced form one another providing an air gap AG for circulation of cooling air therethrough, the packages being spaced apart from one another by member 30. In the case of winding coils from a hollow conductor for liquid cooling, eg. the conductors illustrated in Figs. 18 to 24, the coil layers 10A, 10B, 10C can be wound tightly on one another without any radial spacing between the coil packages. This provides a very rigid structure with close coupling of the coils. The number of turns of the coils winding are designed to balance the coils as closely as possible so as to minimize circulating currents in the parallel connected coils even in the absence of the a current balancing system. Fine tuning of the balancing and balancing under varying load conditions is effected by the previously described arrangement of balancing transformers. As previously explained, the I²R loss of the conductors in the form of heat is removed by cooling ducts in the air-cooled coils and by cooling tubes running down the centre of the special water-cooled conductors. It is also required to remove the heat flux which flows from the hot billet (or melt) out through the refractory between the billet or metal and the coil to control the thermal gradient across the refractory. In the conventional designs this heat flux is removed by the hollow copper winding conductors themselves. For small heat fluxes, the special water-cooled cables can absorb the heat without damaging the conductor 101 around the cooling tube 102. However, for large heat fluxes it is normally necessary to construct a heat sink on the outer surface of the refractory and inside the coil. Figure 25 in partial cut away illustrates a heat sink winding 122 between the refractory 121 and the induction heating coil unit 10. The heat sink comprises a single helical coil or several interwoven helices all in a single layer but isolated from each other and from the main coil. The heat sink coils are wound from a hollow tube the size and material of which are chosen to give good heat transfer characteristics and to have small eddy losses e.g. from #304 stainless steel tube. The heat sink windings carry cooling fluid but carry no current. It is to be understood the coil unit is as described previously with respect to figs. 1 to 24 incorporating the various features, individually, in combination and in various subcombination and permutations. Since the main coil flux induces electromotive forces in the heat sink winding, the number of turns used and the number of interwoven helices can be chosen to grade the voltage along the beat sink winding so that there is virtually no electrical stress between it and the coil windings. This can be achieved by using approximately the same number of turns and the same number of interwoven helices as are used in the innermost layer of the coil. The benefits of constructing induction heating coils according to the methods disclosed herein are illustrated by Tables 1 and 2 below. Table 1 describes the four coils which were built and tested: coils A and B built as single layer coils from hollow copper conductors in the conventional manner and coils AA and BB which were built for the same service but according to the methods disclosed herein. Both of the high efficiency coils comprised two layers of the special conductors described herein and a current balancing scheme like that shown in figure 8 which was used to insure that the currents in the two layers were equal. Table 2 compares the energy transfer efficiency of the conventional coils and of the replacement coils built according to this disclosure for the case where comparable coils were used at the same frequency and where they were required to deliver the same power to the billet. The actual energy transfer efficiency was measured at room temperature 20°C, and the results for these tests are shown. The results were also extrapolated to the case of molten al at 750°C. This was done by using a value for the resistivity of molten al of 28 x 10⁻⁸ ohm meters. The performance of coils A and AA are compared only at the design frequency of 4 kHz while the behaviour of coils B and BB are compared both at the design frequency of 1kHz and also at 3kHz. This superiority of the coils built according to this present disclosure is graphically illustrated. Coil losses in each case are only a small fraction of the coils losses in the conventional coils and the energy transfer efficiency is accordingly very much higher. It was not possible to compare either of these coils directly with coils of the type advocated by I.A. Harvey and by M. Coevert et al, which are referred to in the section "BACKGROUND OF INVENTION". The coils built according to these methods, according to the authors, are not useful beyond about 400 Hz. The power transfer efficiency using these coils at the frequencies indicated in Table 2 would probably be comparable to that of the conventional coils A and B. Coevert et al claimed an efficiency for their coil when heating aluminum at 50 Hz of 54%. By comparison, a three layer coil built according to this disclosure achieved an efficiency of 70%. COIL AND BILLET SPECIFICATIONS COIL BILLET IDENT # TURNS LENGTH IN ID IN OD IN # LAYERS CONDUCTOR LENGTH IN DIA. IN MTL A 17 15 15 16 1 ½" COPPER TUBE, 0.08 WALL 15 10.75 A1 AA 16 15.5 16 20 2 8X5X80 #30 COPPER OVER ½" NYLON 15 10.75 A1 B 28 42 30 32 1 1" COPPER TUBE, 0.12" WALL 42 25 A1 BB 24 42 30 35 2 8X5X80 #30 COPPER OVER ½" NYLON TUBE, WOUND 2-HIGH 42 25 A1 ENERGY TRANSFER EFFICIENCY COIL IDENT FREQ. kHz CURRENT A BILLET TEMP °C BILLET POWER kW COIL I²R kW EFF % A 4 1500 20 21.8 41.8 34.3 AA 4 1790 20 21.8 9.0 70.7 A 4 1500 750 65. 41.8 61. AA 4 1790 750 65. 9.0 88. B 1 2700 20 95. 98.0 49. BB 1 2700 20 95. 22. 81. B 1 2700 750* 285. 98. 74. BB 1 2700 750* 285. 22. 93 B 3 2700 750* 490. 164. 75. BB 3 2700 750* 490. 24. 95

Claims: A coil, for electric inductive heating apparatus, characterized in that it is a rigid open ended sleeve-like coil unit (10A, 10B, 10C) that includes at least two helical inductive coil windings (11A, 11B, 11C, 11D) embedded in a temperature resistant reinforced resin with each of said coil windings having a plurality of helical turns of multi-strand insulated conductor (91, 101) with said coil windings being connected in parallel and further characterized in current balancing means (40, 70, 80) operative in response to current flow through respective ones of said coil windings automatically forcing said coil windings to maintain a selected predetermined share of current flow including during variations of load and/or frequency. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 1 characterized in that the current balancing is provided by transformer means (70) connected such that current flowing through one winding of the inductive coil flows through a first winding of the transformer means and current flowing through another winding of the inductive coil flows through a second winding of the transformer means, said first and second windings of the transformer means being inductively coupled in a manner effective to automatically balance the current in respective ones of said coil windings. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 1 characterized in that the current balancing comprises transformer moans (70) in which the respective coil windings (11A, 11B, 11C, 11D) feed through a respective one of a plurality of transformer secondary windings, in that the primary windings of said transformers carry the total coil current and in that the turns ratio of each transformer is chosen so that the coil windings (11A, 11B, 11C, 11D) share the total current in predetermined proportions. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 1 characterized in that the current balancing means comprises transformer means (70) having a primary for each of the respective individual coil windings (11A, 11B, 11C) and connected in series with the respective windings and wherein the secondary windings of the tranasformer means are serially connected in a closed loop thereby automatically forcing the individual coils to carry an equal share of the current. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, defined in claim 1 characterized in that said coil windings (11A, 11B, 11C) are interleaved such that the helices are one on top of the other forming a single layer coil. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 5 characterized in that there are a plurality of laminated steel yokes (40) disposed in circumferential spaced relation about the rigid coil unit and outwardly therefrom and in that current balancing and voltage grading within a layer are simultaneously provided by connecting the several interleaved windings in each layer to an outer split ring bus (50, 60) at respective opposite ends of said rigid coil unit. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 5 characterized in that the coil windings terminate at selected different circumferential positions (A, B, C, D) around said coil unit. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 7 characterized in that there are a plurality of laminated steel yokes (40) disposed in circumferential spaced relation about the rigid coil unit and outwardly therefrom and in that current balancing and voltage grading within a layer are simultaneously provided by connecting the several interleaved windings in each layer to an outer split ring bus (50, 60) at respective opposite ends of said rigid coil unit and in that said coil is a single layer and in that the split rings (50, 60) connecting the winding: in parallel are of larger diameter than the outer diameter of said coil unit. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 1 characterized in that said coil windings are formed in coil layers (10A, 10B, 10C) radially one outside of the other providing a multiple layer coil. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 9 characterized in that each said coil layers each comprise two or more identical interleaved coil windings. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 10 characterized in that the inductive coil has at least two concentric layers internested tightly one upon the other and in that each layer has two or more interleaved Coil windings and in that the current balancing is provided by current transformers (70) Connected so as to force all winding to carry a predetermined portion of the total current regardless of variations of load and/or frequency. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 10 characterized in that current balancing and voltage grading are provided by a combination of external reactors (80, 81) and current balancing transformers (70). A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in any one of the preceding claims characterized in that the insulated conductor of said coil windings comprises a plurality of subconductors (91, 101) spiralled about a common axis, thereby being continuously transposed. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in any one of the preceding claims characterized in that the conductor of the coil windings has a passage for circulating a cooling fluid through the coil. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 14 characterized in that the coil windings are insulated subconductors spiralled about the outer surface of a tube (102) and in that a cooling fluid can be circulated through such tube. A coil, for induction heating apparatus, as defined in claim 15 characterized in that the multi-strand conductor is insulated (103) strands (101) spirally disposed about the outer surface of a tube (102) through which a cooling fluid can be circulated and in that the tube has predetermined heat transfer properties and predetermined eddy losses taking into account coil geometry, frequency and ampere turns for which the coil has been designed and that said strands have a diameter and are of sufficient number to provide selected eddy losses and carry a predetermined current through said coil winding. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in any one of the preceding claims characterized in that a heat shield (121, 122) is located radially inwardly of the induction coil. A coil, for inductive heating, as defined in claim 17 characterized in that the heat shield is a heat sink and that the heat sink is a generally cylindrical sleeve-like unit containing tubing through which a cooling fluid can be circulated. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 18 characterized in that an inner surface of the coil unit and an outer surface of said heat shield unit mate with one another and in that such mating surfaces are tapered facilitating separating one from the other. A coil, for inductive heating apparatus, as defined in claim 18 characterized in that the heat sink tubing (122) is in the form of a plurality of helical turns. The coil of claim 1 characterized in that a heat-sink winding (122) is associated with the coil to provide required heat gradient across refractor (121) without overheating the coil conductor and at the same time to prevent large voltage differences between the heat-sink winding (122) and the coil (10).

Inventors: BURKE PATRICK EARL, BURKE,PATRICK EARL
Applicants: BBA CANADA, BBA CANADA LIMITED
Application year: 1987
Main classification: H05B6
IPC codes: H05B6