METHOD USING A PROGRAMMED DIGITAL COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR TRANSLATION BETWEEN NATURAL LANGUAGES

Abstract: A computerized translation method with universal application to all natural languages is provided. With this method, parameters are changed only when source or target languages are changed. The computerized method can be regarded as a self-contained system, having been developed to accept input texts in the source language, and look up individual (or sequences of) textwords in various dictionaries. On the basis of the dictionary information, sequences of operations are carried out which gradually generate the multiplicity of computer codes needed to express all the syntactic and semantic functions of the words in the sentence. On the basis of all the codes and target meanings in the dictionary, plus synthesis codes of such meanings, translation is carried out automatically. Procedures which generate and easily update main dictionaries, idiom dictionaries, high frequency dictionaries and compound dictionaries are integral parts of the system.

Description: Background of the Invention This invention relates to a method utilizing a digital computer for translating between natural languages. Attempts have been made to utilize digital computers for translating from one language to another, i.e., from a source language to a target language. The translation systems involve a programmable digital computer system along with a program for effecting the translation. The approaches used were theoretical. The theoretical language approach for syntactical analysis has not been acceptable because it starts out from linguistic assumptions instead of considering the capabilities of the program digital computer and approaching the translation from the computer's point of view. One reason for the failures in the past was that linguistics and computer programmers worked in separate groups. The information exchanges between these groups was negligible. Either linguistic approaches were forced into the computer, in which case the computer was not used correctly, or they were modified to such an extent that they could not carry out the tasks. The idea of machine translation was conceived in 1946 by Warren Weaver and A. D. Booth. Many attempts to achieve a machine translation system and put it into operation have been made inside and outside the United States since that time. Due in part to inadequacy of hardware, the projects outside of the United States did not make significant progress. The projects in the United States were directed toward developing linguistic theories encompassing the whole natural language and then going to the computer. This approach inevitably failed because the human mind cannot encompass the totality of the language. The approaches were also unsuccessful because the work was restricted to experimental work on certain aspects of the problem. The following is a brief resume in the approaches and the theory behind them: The General Analysis Technique (GAT) developed at Georgetown University from 1958 to 1963 used a linguistics oriented computer coding scheme. Ad hoc solutions were introduced and the whole system was confined within a hollow restricted so-called Simulated Linguistic Computer (SLC) system written in octal language and not open for any further improvements. The Fulcrum theory approach developed from 1959 to 1967 by the Bunker-Ramo Corporation, was directed toward solving, with a relatively small dictionary, the problems occurring in a limited Russian text. No attempt was made to introduce resolution of multiple meanings; instead, several meanings were printed in the output, separated by slashes. An approach taken by International Business Machines in 1957 to 1968, initiated by International Telemeter Corporation, was hardware oriented. An attempt was made to insert all the words, and every compound in declinable form, in a photo disk for a large scale dictionary lookup. Syntactic considerations were very limited. Both the approach and hardware failed because compounds cannot be just translated as they occur, but have to undergo a syntactic analysis. In addition, tiny unavoidable accumulations of dirt or dust on the disk caused serious problems resulting in unusable translations. A predictive syntax system was developed by the National Bureau of Standards and Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1960 to 1964. This approach failed because it considered only one limited path to the sentence. This system was never implemented on a larger scale, but was used just within a limited experimental environment. Transformational grammar was another approach. However, this approach turned out to be absolutely incompatible with computer translation requirements. Only small experimental systems have been developed on the basis of this theory, and they had to be discontinued before any significant translation was produced. The invention described here proceeded from its very inception toward the goal of setting up a "universal" translation system, defined as one in which most of the programs could be universally applied to different source or target languages. SYSTRAN realizes this goal -- the only changes for different languages are those necessitated by the inherent structures of the languages. Dictionary arrangement, the lookup concept, the utilization of memory switches during syntactic analysis and the resolution of multiple meaning problems use the same basic approaches regardless of source or target languages. The European Patent Application EP-A-0 012 777 discloses a method for translation between source and target natural languages using a programmable digital computer system. This method comprises : (a) storing in a main memory of the computer system a source text to be translated ; (b) scanning and comparing such stored source words with dictionaries of source language words stored in a memory and for each source text word for which a match is found, storing in a file in main memory each word, and in association with each such word, coded information derived from such dictionary for use in translation of such word, the coded information including memory offset address linkages to a memory in the computer system where grammar and target language translations for the word are stored ; (c) analyzing the source text words in its file of words, a complete sentence at a time, and converting the same into a sentence in the target language utilizing the coded information and including the steps of (1) utilizing the memory offset address linkages for obtaining the target language translations of words from a memory ; and (2) reordering the target language translation into the proper target language sequence. The step of analyzing additionally comprises the steps of analyzing each source word in multiple passes through each sentence of the source text, assigning codes thereto, considering all the codes which previous passes have attached to a word and assigning target language synthesis codes attached to the meaning with which the code functions in the sentence, placing the word into a form corresponding to the target language dependent upon the analysis and consideration of all relevant codes assigned to the words. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The object of the present invention is to improve the method mentioned in the above paragraph so that it may be implemented more efficiently, particularly for translations between natural languages having a great variety of declensional and conjugational modes. According to the invention, the method is characterized in that said dictionaries of source language words comprise entries containing a source language stem, the coded information associated to such entry comprising an adress linkage (PST) relating to the set of valid endings permitted for said source language stem, and in that, for each source text word, the step of comparing such word with dictionaries of source language words comprises the steps of : inspecting said dictionaries to determine whether a particular entry thereof matches said source text word, if no match is found, dropping the last letter of said source text word ; and repeating the sequence of said steps of inspecting and dropping the last letter until a match is found with a source language stem entry of said dictionaries, the number of letters dropped being less than a predetermined number representing the maximum ending length for said source text word. The appearance of fourth generation computers made it possible to introduce approaches which would be capable of producing acceptable machine translations. The best utilization of the logical structures of these computers, and maximal coordination of rapid transfer of data between auxiliary and high speed storages, plus the development of a complete system, made it possible to realize the goal of an automatic means to overcome the communication problem between natural languages. The present invention hereafter called SYSTRAN was possible because of the combination of experiences as systems analyst, linguist and computer programmer. The experience in the three areas enabled the inventor to develop the approaches which resulted in the invention. The unique solution which is elaborated upon herein can be summarized as follows : computerized syntax, a dictionary lookup which is based on the most efficient exploitation of main and auxiliary storages and which uses four different types of dictionaries, the combination of fixed and variable length areas for full utilization of the computer, the introduction of remembering switches, new ways of handling multiple meaning problems, and system translation (SYSTRAN), universality which makes it possible to change only tables in most instances when source and/or target languages are changed. SYSTRAN takes full advantage of coordinated usage of the various auxiliary devices, which allows easy access to the various dictionaries. The computer is still handicapped in comparison to the human mind, due first of all to the size of the computer's limited high speed, rapid access, core memory. The SYSTRAN system overcomes such a handicap to a considerable degree by setting up a coordinated system of dictionaries. The dictionaries are updated on magnetic tapes, for actual usage they are available on rapid access discs and in the high speed core memory. In addition, with SYSTRAN an entirely new approach to syntactic analysis has been introduced. This approach involves automatic parsing. None of the machine translation systems developed prior to SYSTRAN achieved the effectiveness of this automatic syntactic analysis technique. The computer is instructed in every instance what to remember, either by codes attached to the words from the source sentence, or by a temporary plug-in of a sequence of these memory switches during particular passes. During this analysis, the computer simulates the human translation process in that it sets "remembering" switches as it passes through the sentence. On the basis of which switches are set, the decision to start a new routine is made when a new part of speech is encountered. Program sections, called routines, can call upon individual subroutines to carry out those tasks which must be carried out repeatedly. A subroutine may use nested subroutines to check for certain parameters before making a decision. The System uses many unique approaches and methods at every level in carrying out translation automatically from a source language into a target language. A program for translating between source and target natural languages in accordance with the present invention involves a system wherein all the logical capabilities of the digital computer are first considered and a programming system is organized in a form which can be processed by the computer. To this end, new features were introduced in the language theory. A new part of speech concept breaks with the traditional parts of speech and organizes the functional classes in the language according to their most suitable form for processing by the computer. Codes are assigned to language units, to words, to expressions, and even to complete phrases in order to enable a program to correctly recognize the function of the words within the sentence. This is in sharp contrast to previous systems where codes were only assigned to individual words. The method involves a complete system which starts with the reading in of source language text, breaks the text down into individual words and looks up these words in various dictionaries. Codes are attached to the words which are indispensable for further processing and computer understanding of the source text. With the help of codes attached to individual words or expressions, the computer carries out a hierarchial analysis during which more and more codes are attached to each word. These codes express for the computer the syntax of the individual sentences and enable subsequent programs to find the meaning in the sentence as well as all those factors which influence the meaning within or without the particular sentence under analysis. On the basis of this procedure, an unambiguous translation is carried out. The program in accordance with the present invention is capable of utilizing an unlimited number of routines attached to each source word. The routines are attached irrelevant of the source and target languages under consideration. These routines take into consideration the computer established syntactic interconnections of the words, phrases, etc. and using semantic categories, find the meaning influencing words for every individual word with multiple meaning in the sentence. Unique to an embodiment of the present invention, a program is capable of attaching to the individual source language entries a virtually unlimited number of target language meanings and of organizing them according to subject fields. During the translation, the first selected meaning reflects the subject field in which the translation takes place cutting down considerable on the multiple meaning problems. To the general types of words which occur in every subject field, routines are attached to solve their meaning within every possible environment. Word groups are translated as a unit, either as idiom or so-called limited semantic compound expressions (L.S. expression). The advantage of the L.S. compound is that whenever the source language is inflected, one such entry can translate correctly the compound irrespective of which case or conjunctional form it occurred in the text. Another feature of the embodiment of the present invention is its open-endedness. In other words, the system is quite modular and this is felt to be a primary feature of an embodiment of the present invention. One feature of the modularity is that there is no limit in adding compounds to the system. The number of idiomatic expressions is limited only by the high speed core memory used. Also unique to one embodiment of the present invention, is that although an idiom is translated as a unit, the participating words may be undergoing a complete syntactic analysis. As a result, the automatic translation does not suffer by the fact that an idiom has been translated. Another feature of an embodiment of the present invention is that limited semantic compounds are stored on disks and are rapidly accessed in a way that the most frequent ones are available during the dictionary lookup procedure, and less frequent ones are made available during the actual translation process. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention a special up-date system is provided with independent routines that carry out changes within the various dictionaries, including the general dictionaries, high frequency dictionaries, idiom dictionaries and limited semantics (L.S.) compound dictionaries. The update system has built in features for automatic controls so that possible errors due to erroneous coding are automatically eliminated. Whenever an entry is rejected as unacceptable, a message indicates the type of error committed so that the dictionary coder can easily find the problem. The computer is used to full advantage by the use of a higher language which is adapted to the special requirements of machine translation. Each instruction of the higher language stands for a large number of machine languages statements and facilitates the programming without undue core storage requirements. This computer language is known as a macro language for language translation and itself is felt to be a unique feature of one embodiment of the present invention. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, repeated scans are carried out through the sentence for certain grammar codes which help the computer first to eliminate basic ambiguities and establish through codes attached to the words, basic interconnections between the words. More detailed semantic tests are made in subsequent passes and phrases and clauses are gradually delimited and higher sentence markers such as subjects and/or predicates in the target language are established. The last of the scans determines the function of every word and resolves indeterminate or ambiguous syntactic relationships between words in a sentence. These passes set up a syntactical profile of the sentence expressed by coded information in a way which a computer can utilize. Resultant source sentences with the generated codes are inserted into a predetermined cleaned up location in the memory reserved for this purpose and codes are generated after each word. Codes reflect all of the existing interconnections between the words of the source sentence. Although only one sentence is generally analyzed at a time, the system has provisions to store information in order to remember from previous sentences information which should be taken into consideration in resolving certain ambiguities in following sentences. This is completely unique to the preferred embodiment of the present invention. The connections between words are expressed in codes which uniquely define the syntactic and semantic connections in each sentence and between sentences. According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the program has the ability to resolve multiple meanings. In order to accomplish such resolution, there is provided a subject field glossary or topical glossary. For the first time in machine translation, the ability is provided to attach to source language entries in the dictionary target meanings which meanings are located in the topical glossaries. Each time a text is translated an indication can be given to the computer which of the topical glossaries should be consulted. If no indication is available during translation as to which topical glossary or topical glossary sequences are to be used, a general meaning is selected from the main dictionary for every word to be translated. According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, idiomatic expressions or idioms contain two or more words in the source language which in a definite sequence represent a unique meaning unit and should be translated as such. An algorithm determines during the translation phase the function of the idiom and accordingly selects the correct idiom meaning, from among a number of possible meanings. The meanings are in the target language. The idiom meaning or meanings are attached to the first source text word of an idiom. The rest of the words in the idiom, i.e. the second and subsequent words, receive a tag which marks them as being translated. All of the words in an idiomatic expression also undergo a dictionary lookup procedure whereby they receive grammar and meaning codes from the main dictionary and are subjected to the syntactical analysis discussed hereinabove. Thus, the idiom words may become one or more syntactic units independent of the fact that they together form an idiomatic semantic unit. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, limited semantic compounds are used for resolving multiple meanings and eliminating semantic problems. According to this procedure, thousands of words with which a particular word may be combined to form a limited semantic compound are stored in the storage facilities of the computer and are selected for further use in accordance with the particular results of the syntactic analysis. The programming system has a unique capability to incorporate such limited semantic compounds according to the various subject fields and during translation, if a compound expression has more than one meaning, it retrieves only that meaning which corresponds to the subject field under translation. The compounds carry syntactic and semantic codes which are used during the determination of their function and their correct translation. Limited semantic expressions usually contain a principal word which can undergo declension or conjugation. Codes for such declension or conjugation in the target language are attached to the compound in question. The principal words in essence, which determines the meaning of a particular compound,carries, in a highly condensed form, information concerning the possible other words with which the word may form a unique compound expression. The information is coded as a sequence of numbers. This procedure for generating the L.S. compound numbers assigns to every word in the source language dictionary a unique L.S. number. Not only are individually all the L.S. numbers of the participating word attached to the principal word by there is also an indication of which position in each compound the principal word occupies in relation to its participating words, i.e. is the principal word the first word, the second word, the third word, etc. in a compound. An L.S. dictionary is provided and whenever a principal word is encountered during dictionary lookup, 300 bytes (2400 bits) of information of participating word numbers are attached immediately to the principal word. If the L.S. information (in the form of a sequence of numbers) for one principal word exceeds 2400 bits, the information is not attached during dictionary lookup to the word, but is left in the particular storage area from where it is retrieved during translation procedure. The storage area is on a disk. There is virtually no limit in the number of compounds which can be attached to a principal word. Presently the longest information attached in sequences of numbers to principal words exceeds 14000 bytes (14000 x 8 bits). Also in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the following step in the solution of the multiple meaning problem are the lexical subroutines. The names of the subroutines are arranged in a binary table and whenever a word occurs which carries a bit indicating that the lexical routine should be called, the particular routine is identified and a binary search is carried out in the list to call in the particular routine. The frequently used routines are kept in the high speed core memory whereas others are available for easy access on auxiliary storage devices such as disks. These routines can be called in a parallel operation to the translation process preventing waste of time. Although the routines are prepared primarily to handle multiple meanings, i.e. semantic problems, several of them resolve syntactic ambiguities. Whenever a lexical routine determines the correct meaning, it attaches the meaning to a word with proper synthesis codes. During translation, this newly attached meaning is considered. Due to the new meaning, some of the words in the sentence lose their previous meanings. As the words are translated, they are marked with a tag as having been translated. According to a further preferred embodiment of the invention, a subsequent step in the translation process involves resolution of the generalized multiple meaning problem. According to the unique concepts of a preferred embodiment of the invention, a generalized approach has been implemented to solve the multiple meaning ambiguites. The words in the source language receive semantic categorization codes. Each word may belong to a series of semantic categories. These categories are arranged in groups and attached in condensed bit format to the words in the dictionary. Each bit represents a category. If a particular bit is on, the word belongs to such a category. If the bit is not on, the category is not applicable to the particular word. Rules are expressed in decimal numbers which tell the program which routine must be called in order to resolve the ambiguity of a particular word, and the rulles are considered in sequence. Routines are carried out in exactly the same sequence as the rules. The number of the rule indicates for the routine the type of syntactic connection within which search should be carried out for the availability of semantic categories i.e., words which have certain semantic category codes. Each time when within a defined syntactic relationship a word with a certain semantic category bit is encountered, a meaning will be selected which is indicated by the respective meaning number in the rule. The rule may specify that in order to select a particular meaning, more than one category must be available and indicates what type of relationship the word with its particular semantic categories must be in relation to an ambiguous word. Rules are of variable length that are attached to each word in the dictionary. These rules are introduced during dictionary lookup in a fashion resembling the introduction of grammar codes and are use in the generalized semantic program to resolve the ambiguity of the particular word. Brief Description of the Drawings Fig. 1 is a generalized flow diagram illustrating the SYSTRAN translation system embodying the present invention; Fig. 1A is a more detailed flow diagram of the SYSTRAN IBM 360/65 operation embodying the present invention; Fig. 2 is a generalized sketch illustrating the high frequency/idiom lookup operation of Fig. 1A Fig. 3 is a generalized flow diagram illustrating the main dictionary lookup operation of Fig. 1A Fig. 4 is a more detailed flow diagram illustrating the high frequency/idiom lookup for a specific Russian sentence; Fig. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation during stem lookup operation for the Russian sentence shown in Fig. 4; Fig. 6 is a more detailed flow diagram illustrating an example of limited semantics lookup operation for the Russian sentence shown in Fig. 4; Fig. 7 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation of the LOADTXT program; Fig. 8 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the MDL program; Fig. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation during the INITCALL program; Fig. 10 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence for the GETSENTN program; Fig. 11 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the STRPASS0 program; Fig. 12 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the STRPSS1 program; Fig. 13 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation during the STRPASS1 program for a POS NOUN 10 part of speech; Fig. 14 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation during the STRPASS1 program for a verb-04 part of speech; Fig. 15 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation during the STRPASS1 program for an adjective participle-20 and 80 part of speech; Fig. 16 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the STRPASS2 program; Fig. 17 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for a STRPASS 3 program; Fig. 18 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the STRPASS4 program; Fig. 19 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the PREPTR program; Fig. 20 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the LEXICAL program; Fig. 21 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the SEMANTIC program; Fig. 22 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the REARR program; Fig. 23 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the PRINT program; Figs. 24 through 33 are detailed flow diagrams illustrating the sequence of operation for the TLSYN (ESYN) program; Fig. 34 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the program RUMO; Fig. 35 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the SYSNOUN program; and Fig. 36 is a detailed flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation for the SYSVERB program. Description of the Preferred Embodiment 1. Generally Description of Systran Translation System The appendices hereto give a symbolic listing of the SYSTRAN programs. The meaning of the symbolic language is explained in the book IBM System/360 Operating System Assembler Language , File Number S360-21 , Form Number C28-6514-4 , published by IBM. The symbolic listing is converted to actual machine code for the IBM 360/65 through the assembler program which is a normal part of very IBM 360/65 computer. Fig. 1 is a flow diagram which illustrates an overall programming system used on programmable digital data processing systems for translation from one natural language to another. The specific programming system disclosed herein by way of example is for translation from Russian to English and is known as the "Systran System". However, the inventive concepts are applicable to translation between any two natural languages such as English and Chinese, Spanish, etc. Referring to Fig. 1, the first step consists of the preparation of the Russian text for computer translation. This is accomplished by having the text typed on a magnetic tape Selectric typewriter (MTST) made by the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The typewriter is used to replace each Cyrillic letter in the Russian text with a Latin letter or combination of letters. The MTST codes the Latin characters and records the code characters on magnetic tapes in cartridges. To provide print format control of the English translation, special coded control characters are typed interspersed with the text. The text on the MTST tape cartridge is converted to characters suitable for processing by the IBM 360/65 digital computer. The conversion is made to IBM 360/65 characters and recorded on magnetic tape utilizing the Data Corporation MTST converter. Having passed through this preparatory stage, the Russian text is next translated by processing on the IBM 360/65 digital computer. The present minimum requirements of SYSTRAN on the IBM 360/65 are 512 bytes of core memory, one input and one output tape and four disk storage drives for dictionary program, and data manipulation usage. The disk storage drives are sold by IBM under the number 2314. The steps of processing are described in the subsequent paragraphs. The output from the IBM 360/65 system is a magnetic tape with the English translation. This tape is processed on a digital computer sold by IBM known as the IBM 1401 computer for the purpose of preparing the English translation listing. The actual listing is on a printer attached to the IBM 1401 computer system. The IBM 1401 computer has a special upper and lower case print chain for capitalization indication, as well as additional special characters to compose 120 character print chain. A set of tables is located at the end of the specification and is referred to hereinafter. Table I gives a list of the computer programs used in the SYSTRAN SYSTEM together with a brief description of the meaning of each program. The translation process on the IBM 360/65 system comprises the following 12 programs listed in Table 1 STRPASS0; STRPASS1; STRPASS2; STRPASS3; STRPASS4: LSLOOKUP; LEXICAL; SEMANTIC; PREPTR; REARR; TLSYN(ESYN) and TRPRINT. The program MT/ST edits and converts the MT/ST text. The programs LOADTXT through SYSVERB perform dictionary look-up functions, gather information and attach the information to the source text words. The programs STRPASS-0 through STRPASS-4 prepare the input text together with information from certain translation dictionaries (which will be described in detail) for the programs LEXICAL through TLSYN(ESYN) which perform the actual translation. The functions of the individual programs are presented below. The rest of the general description is directed to the operations of the SYSTRAN SYSTEM using the IBM 360/65 and the IBM 1401. There are inherent difficulties associated with substituting a computer for a human translator to perform language translation. The human mind has the capability of "understanding" the text by making almost simultaneous, structural interconnections between words. The computer's limitations in this area are overcome by utilizing its great speed, storage of unlimited source material, and ability to perform repetitious and tedious tasks without succumbing to error. The system presented herein has minimized the machine limitations, while capitalizing on the computer's capabilities. The logic employed in the translation process can be divided into three primary phases. The first is DICTIONARY LOOKUP in which the computer storage is drawn upon to symbolically classify the source words. The second phase is the SYNTACTICAL analysis of the text, e.g., the establishment of interrelationships between words within a sentence. The third phase is the actual SYNTHESIS into the target language or languages. Each of these steps will be dealt with independently, both in terms of the computer system design and the translation scheme. A. DICTIONARY LOOKUP This phase of the translation process involves programs LOADTXT and MDL and is distinguished by the implementation of various computer tables that carry information necessary for the accurate translation of the source text. Many of these tables are penetrated through the use of address linkages which point to or locate the expanded information on disk. Codes and addresses are affixed to the source text during this phase and are carried from this phase into SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS and SYNTHESIS. Figs. 2 and 3 illustrate the dictionaries used during DICTIONARY LOOKUP and the way in which they are interconnected by address linkages or offset addresses. LOADTXT (TABLE 1) is the program which executes the instructions for input and work during this phase and separates the words into individual records. The programs for the actual dictionary lookup are high frequence and idiom lookup and main dictionary lookup. These processes are briefly described below. (1) High Frequency and Idiom Lookup Figure 2 is a generalized sketch illustrating the sequence of operations during High Frequency and Idiom Lookup. Figure 7 shows a flow diagram of the LOADTXT program. The source text words are read in and stored in main core memory by the LOADTXT program. As each individual word enters the core memory, the program matches the word against a dictionary of high frequency words which also contain the first words of all idioms. This dictionary is called the HF/IDIOM DICTIONARY. The high frequency words are a relatively small number of frequently encountered words in the source language, such as conjunctions, prepositions, and punctuation marks. Looking these up separately from low frequency words saves considerable search time, since the HF/IDIOM DICTIONARY is kept in core memory and does not have to be brought in from auxiliary disk storage. The important advantage of separating the high frequency words is that the high frequency words do not carry the string of grammar and meaning information on disk that the low frequency words carry. Rather, the high frequency words have their grammer and meaning information separately stored in a dictionary which is later referenced by offset or address linkages. The offset or address linkages indicate the location of the corresponding grammer and meaning information in the core memory. The address linkages are stored with each word in the HF/IDIOM DICTIONARY. A word that is a high frequency word is detected by a match with a word in the HF/IDIOM DICTIONARY. Then the appropriate address linkages from the dictionary are attached to the source word and are held in a working file known as the HIGH FREQUENCY FILE to be later merged with low frequency source text words. If a word (irrelevant whether it is part of an idiom or not) is not a high frequency word, it is sent directly to a LOW FREQUENCY FILE from which a Dictionary Lookup (MDL) operation is performed. If a word is the first word of an idiom, it is indicated by a field associated with the word in the HF/IDIOM DICTIONARY. Upon encountering such a word, it must be determined whether any of the words following such first word of an idiom could participate in an idiomatic expression. Each idiomatic phrase may have one through seven words to handle the 2nd through 7th possible idiom words. A set of 2nd word through 7th word IDIOM TABLES are provided. The first word idiom words in the HF/IDIOM TABLE have an offset to a word in the 2nd word IDIOM TABLE which has an offset to a word in the 3rd word IDIOM table, etc. Thus, once a first word of an idiom is found, the 2nd word IDIOM TABLE is searched which contains all possible second words that could follow that particular first word in an idiom. The search continues for third, fourth, to a maximum of seven words, until a match is found for a complete idiom phrase. The last idiom word has associated therewith an offset address linkage to a meaning for the particular idiom. The meaning of the entire idiom is then obtained and attached to the first word of the idiom and all words in the idiom are marked as already translated. If the first word is a high frequency word, as well as being the first word of an idiom, it is written in the high frequency file and it receives the same types of codes as the other high frequency words. If the first word of an idiom is a low frequency word, it is written into the HIGH FREQUENCY FILE for the unique purpose of carrying the meaning, otherwise it goes to a low frequency (LF) file for processing by MDL. The words in the LF are then sorted in ascending alphabetical sequence for lookup in the MASTER STEM DICTIONARY by a standard sort program (not disclosed herein), (2) Main Dictionary Lookup Figure 3 is a generalized sketch illustrating the sequence of operation during main dictionary lookup (MDL). Figure 8 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation by the program MDL. Main dictionary lookup is handled by the MDL program. The stem words for the source language are kept on disk and are called or brought into core memory by the INITCALL PROGRAM as they are needed. Although not essential to the broader concepts of the invention, a preferred embodiment of the invention has the stems stored on three different disks A, B and C, according to length (1-3 characters, 4-7 characters, 8-24 characters), however, this may be modified to a single disk storage. Each entry contains a source language stem word and attached to each stem in this dictionary are paradigmatic set titles (PST) which signify the endings permitted for that stem. Also, there is an address at the stem in the dictionary which points to a disk location carrying additional grammar and meaning information and to LS information. Information in the dictionary also indicates if each word may function as a principal or supplementary word in an LS expression. Full form entries which need no stem ending comparison for match are also kept in the stem dictionary. The program MAIN DICTIONARY LOOK-UP (MDL) obtains or calls in the words from the LOW FREQUENCY FILE and accumulates them on disk. Then a portion of the text words, along with portions of each of the STEM DICTIONARIES on disks are read. The stem dictionaries also contain full forms. They are in alphabetic sequence as are the source text words. In each disk of STEM DICTIONARIES, there are two areas in the core. The first area (A₁, B₁, B₁, X₁) is filled with a portion of text words and STEM DICTIONARIES for the disks. When this is filled, work begins on it by the IBM 360/65 computer and the second area (A₂ , B₂ , C₂, X₂) is filled with more words or stems. The second area acts as a buffer. During the dictionary look-up whenever only a portion of the source word matches with the stem, the ending is analyzed to determine whether it is an allowable ending and if so, what additional grammatical information can be derived from the particular stem and ending combination. Each stem belongs to a defined declensional or conjugational pattern. Such patterns are expressed by PST codes. In addition, every word has a code which indicates whether particular declensional or conjugational patterns should be taken into consideration. On the basis of these codes, one of the following three programs may be activated by MDL: RUMO, SYSNOUN or SYSVERB (Figs. 34, 35 and 36). These programs contain VALID ENDINGS TABLES for every declensional or conjugational pattern of the source language and attach on the basis of such tables grammatical information to the words. If a word is not in the STEM DICTIONARIES, it is analyzed for its component letters, numbers, and/or endings to establish its possible function and subsequently stored until a sufficient number have been accumulated and printed out in an error list. Words that are located in the STEM DICTIONARIES are matched against a table of valid endings answered with the stem word in the STEM DICTIONARIES. The endings are kept in a valid endings table in the memory and are accessed through an address linkage known as the PST code attached to each stem word. Subsequently, the low frequency words are noted back into their original text sequence, and are merged with the HIGH FREQUENCY FILE words which are kept in their original source text sequence, and put into a file known as MERGED FILE. The original sequence of the source text is determined from serial numbers attached to each source word before dictionary lookup commenced. B. Syntactical Analysis The programs GETSENTN through PRINT are initiated and sequentially ordered by the program called INITCALL as generally depicted in Figure 9. The program GETSENTN, called by INITCALL, initiates the analysis of the words as they function in the sentence. Figure 10 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation of GETSENTN. At this time, each separate sentence is handled as the basic unit for structural and syntactical analysis. It is this phase of translation which attempts to compensate for the computer's lack of understanding of the words it reads. GETSENTN first clears the analysis area in the core memory. The sentences are then individually called from the MERGED FILE into the analysis area in the core memory. Fig. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation by the program GETSENTN. A typical example of a listing or print out of one sentence in the source text and associated information is contained in Table 24. (1) Lookup of Limited Semantic Expressions (LSLOOKUP) Lookup of limited semantic expressions is done by the program LSLOOKUP. Before the consideration of words or word groups as entities determined by relative position, a match is done to see if they participate in a limited semantic expression (i.e. multiple meaning is resolved within limited environment). A sketch generally illustrating the sequence of operation during LSLOOKUP is shown in Figure 6. The lookup is done by scanning the sentence looking for attached tags indicating the word is a possible principal word (this information is attached during DICTIONARY LOOKUP). If a principal word is encountered, then words on both sides of it are examined for tags indicating supplementary words. Such an arrangement is based on the fact that every word in the dictionary carries a unique L. S. number which identifies the word for the purpose of limited semantics. The principal word carries the L.S. numbers of all supplementary words with which they may function in a compound. If a principal word has adjacent supplementary words, then a small work area is built in core memory at these words and a LS COMPOUND DICTIONARY is searched for all compound expressions having that principal word occupying that particular position. A match is then done with the supplementary words. If the words are determined to be participants in a limited semantic expression, the information for the expression is attached to the principal word. (2) Structural Passes The structural pass programs are known as STRPASS and operate on each sentence in an area of memory which has been cleaned for this analysis. There are five passes known as STRPASS-0 through STRPASS-4 and each pass elucidates in some way on the previous one. The information gained during a pass is not static and may be elucidated. According to the type of sentence under analysis, certain blanks in the analysis area are gradually filled with information by the five passes. The following gives a description of each: (a) STRPASS-0 . Figure 11 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation during the STRPASS-0 program. STRPASS-0 is a program which, before the actual structural passes are performed, resolves parts of speech ambiguities when they occur. Homograph ambiguites are indicated by the same numeral codes in each language. Special subroutines are accessed through these codes which analyze the relationship of the ambiguous word to other words in the sentence (i.e. their part of speech, POS, and other codes), and determine its part of speech on this basis. The subroutines are adjusted according to the particular source language being used. Words that are definite objects are recognized and appropriate bits or tags are set on in association with each source word in the analysis area. (b) STRPASS 1 . Figure 12 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation during execution of the STRPASS 1 program. STRPASS 1 is a program which moves from the end of the sentence to the beginning as more relationships are established in this manner. Each part of speech code encountered initiates a routine that sets switches or tags associated with each word which indicates its position and possible function. This is made possible by having a dictionary system in which the part of speech (POS) indication is used to initiate selected routines. Figures 13, 14 and 15 are flow diagrams illustrating the sequence of operation for the POS noun, POS verb and POS adjective/participle respectively. Although the routines vary according to the source language, the software support for all natural languages is the same. The switches "remember" previously encountered situations and generalized subroutines are called which make decisions on the basis of these switches. For instance, the determination of the definite object of a verbal form is identical for English, Russian, German, French, etc. The consideration of transitivity or case requirement in some languages is an example of the reason for minor variances in subroutines. (c) STRPASS 2 . Figure 16 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation during execution of the program STRPASS-2. STRPASS-2 is a program which determines the extent to which commas and conjunctions serve as separators between multiple objects, phrases and clauses. It also carries out specialized routines at quotation marks, dashes, and other punctuation marks that have a function in the language of interest. Each punctuation mark has a POS code by which it it recognized. The POS was previously attached during dictionary lookup. Parentheses are classified according to the type of construction they enclose. Also in this pass, the additional information gained from the recognition of punctuation marks is used to mark structures that were not discovered in STRPASS 1. (d) STRPASS 3 . Figure 17 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation during execution of STRPASS-3. STRPASS 3 is a program which locates subject(s) and predicate(s). First a search is carried out for primary predicates based on assigned POS tags attached to the source words. If none of these are available in the sentence, other words which may function as predicates are searched for with the priorities for search being based on the probability of certain parts of speech becoming predicates before others. After the predicate is determined, the subject is searched for. This also proceeds on the basis of probabilities. For example, in the case of Russian and German, nominative nouns are searched for first as they are the primary candidates for subjects. The subjects and predicates must agree in number and gender (if applicable). Any commas with indeterminate function are analyzed in this pass to see if they serve as subsentence unit separators. The location of the subject and predicate enable the discernment of embedded clauses, and multiple predicates and subjects are recognized and noted. The discovery of a subject by this pass may modify information previously inserted in the analysis area relative to function that word. For example, if a noun is called an object in STRPASS 1 and STRPASS 3 does not locate a subject and the predicate is a personal verb, the object must become the subject. In this way the input of new information caused a reevaluation of the sentence structure. (e) STRPASS 4 . Figure 18 is a flow diagram illustrating the sequence of operation during execution of the program STRPASS 4. Both the LEXICAL and SEMANTIC programs have their own supervisory programs which decide at which words in the text these programs should go into effect. The LEXICAL program is composed of many individual subroutines. One of these routines will be activated on the basis of the encountered word during translation. SEMANTIC is a generalized program which is activated each time a multiple meaning word is encountered which has been supplied with parameters for this program. According to the parameters, the program analyzes in a hierarchical sequence the semantic categories of certain words in the sentence with which the multiple meaning word is in defined syntactic relationship. The semantic categories reflect the semantic properties of the words. Each source language word may belong to one or more semantic categories. The parameters are expressed in the form of rules and attached to the individual words which may be translated with different meanings. The lexical routines carry out their task on the basis of checking the environment of the word for which they are called upon. The semantic program analyzes the semantic categories of those words which are in defined syntactic relationships with the word with a meaning ambiguity. The analysis takes place on a hierarchical order indicated by the parameters and rules attached to words with multiple meanings. C. Synthesis into Target Language The synthesis phase of the translation process is carried out by the programs REARR, TLSYN (ESYN) (Target language synthesis) and PRINT, flow diagrams of which are shown in Figures 22 and 24 through 33, respectively. These programs vary somewhat when changing languages depending on the inherent characteristics of the source and target languages. Basically, the synthesis is done by branching on each part of speech. In the case of some parts of speech, tables are interrogated to discover the proper translation. For instance, the verb routines which translate into English, use tables in the computer memory. The tables are selected depending on whether a verb is active, reflexive, or whether the auxiliary 'be'is conjugated. Tables for the translation of the reflexive verbs are further subdivided depending on the types of codes verb reflexive codes (IVB) which exist for the translation of the reflexivity. Each table checks for tense, aspect, person, number, condition, question and negation, and decides accordingly which auxiliary or pronoun should be inserted and what verbal form to be used. TABLES 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, and 2-D show a chart of typical verb tables used during synthesis. This approach to synthesizing the target language is completely unique to this system. During the coding of the source language into the tables, codes are given to the translation which ensure the proper translation. Among these are Topical Glossary Codes (TG) which differentiate between meanings on the basis of the scientific area of interest. In other words, the translation of the word HEAD may be different in the target language, depending upon whether the text being translated is in the area of biology or mechanical engineering. Since prepositions play a primary role in most languages, a special program handles their translation. This program is known as PREPTR (Figure 19). This program considers the codes which are available at words which govern the preposition or at the objects which are governed by the preposition. In addition, if necessary, a more extended environment analysis also takes place. Each language has a unique word order that must be considered when going from one language to another. The program called REARR (Figure 22) deals with this aspect and contains the rules governing the word order in the target language. These rules, together with the grammatical codes produced, attached to each word of the source language by the System, enable the program to first establish the correct sequence of words symbolically and later to print all the words according to this established sequence. An article routine known as ARTICLE may be called on if necessary. Such a routine considers the parameters of the source and target languages, to decide where an article should be inserted, if at all, and what kind. The routine functions within the target language synthesis program (TLSYN). 2. Detailed Description of Components of SYSTRAN Translation System A. Dictionaries (1) General Dictionaries are prepared in two formats: (1) for maintenance processing, and (2) for translation processing. Each format is designed with respect to its own operational tasks to provide ease and efficiency during computer processing. All operations involving the dictionaries have been established to operate in a production environment, i.e., large volumes of additions and modifications may be rapidly coded and processed in one continuous computer updating run. This is one of the important features of an embodiment of the present invention. The master or base dictionaries are those used in maintenance processing and are maintained on magnetic tape. Standard data processing practices are followed in retaining backup cycles of both the master dictionary and updating change transactions to enable recovery from accidental dictionary destruction or updating processing errors. From these dictionaries are created the compact indexed disk dictionaries for fast random access during translation processing. Table 3 give a list of the dictionaries of interest. The master dictionaries consist of two lexical data files. One is the STEM DICTIONARY and the other is an IDIOM/LS EXPRESSION DICTIONARY composed of idioms and Limited Semantics expressions. The translation dictionaries created from these files are STEM LOOKUP AND GRAMMAR DICTIONARY, HIGH FREQUENCY WORD AND GRAMMAR DICTIONARY, IDIOM CORRESPONDENCE DICTIONARY and LIMITED SEMANTICS COMPOUNDS DICTIONARY. (2) MASTER STEM DICTIONARY The MASTER STEM DICTIONARY is maintained on magnetic tape in a compound variable length record format. Table 4 illustrates the word format for each entry in the STEM DICTIONARY. The control portion of each entry has a fixed format with record subpart offset pointers (record offset) to variable grammar sections of the record. The grammer sections will be discussed hereinafter. Updating control is on the stem (STEM) and stem number (SN) fields which make up a unique identity of the dictionary record. The stem number (SN) identifies the entry as a stem of a word characterized by inflections which as a set belong to a specific part of speech which is either a noun, an adjective or a verb. Entries that cannot be inflected (prepositions, abbreviations, acronyms, adverbs, etc.), are treated as full forms and are so here recognized. Other pertinent information contained in the field indicates whether the stem can function as a principal and/or supplementary word in a Limited Semantics expression. The first grammar subpart of the MASTER STEM DICTIONARY entries contains information identified as PART-OF-SPEECH CODES. Here is contained the DPQ and flag byte, the PART-OF-SPEECH CODE, a more detailed PART-OF-SPEECH CODE, and codes specifying the appropriate gender, number, case, person, tense and the paradigms of nouns and adjectives. This subpart is shown in more detail in Table 5 and will be described below. (a) DPQ and flag byte identify whether (1) the stem is a noun, adjective, verb/participle or full form; (2) High frequency word; (3) Reflexive full-form usage; (4) Full-form adjective usage; (b) PART-OF-SPEECH CODE (POS). This is the general PART-OF-SPEECH CODE identifying computer routines to be executed during translation processing. (c) Basic PART-OF-SPEECH CODE (BPQ). This is a more definitive code to qualify PART-OF-SPEECH functions. (d) Gender (1) Masculine (2) Feminine (3) Neuter (e) Number (1) Plural (2) Singular (f) Cases for full-form noun, adjective or participle stems (1) Nominative (2) Genitive (3) Dative (4) Accusative (5) Instrumental (6) Locative (g) Person for full-form verb stems (1) First person singular (2) Second person singular (3) Third person singular (4) First person plural (5) Second person plural (6) Third person plural (h) Tense for full-form finite verb stems; mood (1) Present (2) Past (3) Future (4) Imperative (i) PST (paradigmatic set codes) for other than full-form stem entries. These are codes used by morphological analysis programs executed during dictionary lookup to determine the validity of the text word endings with a particular stem The second grammar subpart, of the MASTER STEM DICTIONARY entries is identified as SYNTAX CODES, is illustrated in more detail in Table 6 and contains information of case requirements, prepositional requirements and syntactic function codes. The contents are: (a) Case determiners (1) Genitive (2) Dative (3) Accusative (4) Instrumental (5) Locative (b) Prepositional requirements for the Russian words CEREZ, DL4, DO, IZ, IZO, K, KO, NA, OT, PO, POD, PRI, PROTIV, S, U, V, ZA, or any combination thereof. (c) Miscellaneous requirements including the following Syntactic function codes (1) Satisfiable independently by infinitive (2) Satisfiable by direct object (3) Satisfiable by adverbial form (4) Personal/impersonal (5) Participle, never adverb (6) Noun-adjective (7) Relative adjective (8) Noun defining adjective (9) Never an adverb, only predicate-adjective short-form-neuter-singular (10) Verbal aspect (11) Satisfiable by prepositional phrase (12) Predicate (short forms or adverbs) (13) Never predicate (14) Animateness (15) Subordinate clause opener The third portion of the grammar part in each MASTER STEM DICTIONARY entry contains case/prepositional translation codes (CASE/PREP CODES) which relate to a table of English prepositions to be used in the translation. The word format is shown in more detail in Table 7. Specifically one embodiment of this invention was the following in the Case/Prepositional Translation Codes: (a) Translation of the instrumental if the governing word is in the active voice or if there is no governor. (b) Translation of the instrumental if the governing word is in the reflexive form (passive voice). (c) Translation of the dative if the governing word is in the active voice. (d) Translation of the dative if the governing word is in the reflexive form (passive voice). (e) Prepositional translation control bytes for ZA, V, VO, S, SO, RADI, PROTIV, PRI, PO,CEREZ, PERED, OT, OKOLO, O, OB, POD, NAD, NA, K, KO, IZ-ZA, IZ, IZO, DO, U. The fourth and largest subpart of each MASTER STEM DICTIONARY entry contains the target language information such as the Topical Glossary codes, English synthesis codes and the English meaning. Table 8 shows the word format in more detail and indicates: (a) TG (Topical Glossary code). This code identifies which group of the English meanings is to be used for the technological discipline being translated as the meaning can be considerably different for various types of technical texts. During the translation, multiple Topical Glossary codes may be specified with a preference order for their use and this specification may vary at any point or points in the text. (b) Target synthesis codes are variable depending on the words involved. By way of example theses codes may include: (1) Identity of the use of the meaning as a verb, noun, adjective or other (2) Article usage code (3) Synthesis code for various forms of the verbs and adjectives and for pluralizing the noun (4) Specification as to which word in an expression is to be synthesized. The last part of the grammar portion of each MASTER STEM DICTIONARY entry is called ADDITIONAL VERB STEMS and is present for each verb infinitive and contains a table of all additional forms derived from this infinitive so that these additional stem records may be updated automatically whenever the infinitive is updated. In this manner, it can be assured that all forms of the verb will have the same grammar codes as the infinitive. The format of the ADDITIONAL VERB STEM is shown in more detail in Table 9. (3) STEM DICTIONARY UPDATING A Stem Dictionary Coding Sheet has been designed to make possible that any subpart of the grammar section of the dictionary record may be completely revised or to permit that merely an individual bit of information be changed. This is carried out by Transaction Codes specifying the normal data processing updating functions of "add", "delete", "modify" and "replace". The dictionary coding sheet entries are keypunched and then processed by the computer programs known as DEDIT and DUPDDT (see Table 1) in the updating series which performs editing and formating functions. Since the coding sheet is a general form used for updating all types of dictionary stems, each entry is audited for content and permissible usage with the particular stem being updated. An error list is printed of each deviation and the transaction record is rejected from further processing. Valid transactions are then formated for updating the Master Dictionary. The valid transactions from the edit program are sorted to a Master Dictionary control sequence (stem and stem number) and matched against the Master File. Upon a match, the Master Dictionary record is disassembled into table area with fixed base locations within the memory of the computer. The Transaction Code of the change entry is examined and the corresponding portion of the dictionary entry is updated. Prior to actual modification of the master record, updating codes, in addition to the transaction code, are examined to insure the validity and accuracy in updating. Any transactions which would result in updating errors are rejected and an Error Listing is prepared. Since linguistic codes can be developed faster than the Master File format and the programs utilizing the file can be modified, these codes are entered on the General Coding Sheet, but are listed on Future Code Lists. These lists are saved and when the computer system has been modified, the future code lists are reintroduced into the updating process. Upon completion of updating the master record, it is condensed back into a compact compound variable length record and written out to a new master file. At this time, if the master is a verb infinitive, an updating transaction record is prepared for updating all the additional stem forms of the infinitive. These transactions are sorted to dictionary control sequence and the intermediate new master is read and the updating process is repeated for the additional verb stem modifications. This run produces the final NEW MASTER STEM DICTIONARY. During the updating run, a printout is provided in which all change transactions are listed by rejection errors, duplicate transactions, and future codes. The MASTER STEM DICTIONARY changes are listed by updated records and deleted records. In addition, a statistical report is prepared giving the counts of updating action, the counts of the different types of stems (full forms, nouns, adjectives, and verbs), and an indication of the length of the longest MASTER STEM DICTIONARY record. In addition to the listing of dictionary records during the updating process, a separate program is available for listing the entire MASTER STEM DICTIONARY, or selected portions thereof, or particular stem records having certain characteristics. In the latter case, specialized routines with selection criteria can be individually assembled and called by a master dictionary print program through use of processing control cards. The dictionary is printed in characters where words are present and in hexadecimal where bit codes are present. (4) MASTER IDIOM/L.S. EXPRESSION DICTIONARY The Master Idiom/L.S. Expression Dictionary is also maintained on magnetic tape in a compound variable length record format. An example of the format of each entry is shown in Table 10. In one embodiment of the invention, there are 3,279 idioms and 156,134 L.S. expressions in the dictionary. The control portion of the record has a fixed format containing the Russian expression and source language codes. This part is followed by a variable length target language section. Included here are the Topical Glossary Code (TG), English synthesis codes (SYN. CODES) and the TARGET MEANING (or English meaning). Multiple Topical Glossary (TG) entries may be present and each may have multiple English meanings attached. (a) Russian level source codes include: (1) Prepositional object (2) Number object (3) Prepositional object definite article (4) Verbal type compound (5) Direct object (6) Eliminate preposition (7) Pronoun (8) Object case (b) The TG code and SYN codes are the same as the entries in the MASTER STEM DICTIONARY. (5). MASTER IDIOM/L.S. DICTIONARY UPDATING A separate coding sheet from the stem dictionary coding sheet is utilized to update the Idiom/L.S. Dictionary. Each Topical Glossary target translation record may be updated independently from each other. These coding sheet entries are keypunched and introduced into the updating process beginning with an Editing and Formating Program. Each coding sheet entry is examined for validity of content and the transaction record is rejected if any invalid codes are present with a listing prepared thereof. The valid coding sheet transactions are formated into a variable length updating record and written to a separate file. This file is sorted to Master Idiom/L.S. Dictionary sequence and then matched on the Russian expression against the dictionary. Matching entries result in either a deletion or replacement. Unmatching entries result in an addition or error of unmatching deletion. During the updating run, a listing is prepared of all transaction activity by addition, replacement and deletion. A separate program is also available for printing the entire dictionary, portions thereof and records based on a selection criteria. The latter is effected in the same manner as with the stem dictionary print program. (6). TRANSLATION DICTIONARIES The dictionaries actually used during SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS and SYNTHESIS are created from the tape MASTER STEM DICTIONARY and MASTER IDIOM/L.S. DICTIONARY and are located on disks in various forms of lookup dictionaries. All of the dictionaries are interrelated by disk address pointers and memory offset pointers. Three Operating System Programs available from IBM, known as QSAM, BSAM and BDAM, are utilized to access the various dictionaries. The various dictionaries and the table illustrating the word format of each entry in each dictionary are as follows: (a) STEM LOOKUP AND GRAMMAR TRANSLATION DICTIONARIES (Table 11) (b) HIGH FREQUENCY WORD AND GRAMMAR DICTIONARIES (Table 12) (c) IDIOM CORRESPONDENCE DICTIONARY (Table 13) (d) L.S. COMPOUND MASTER DICTIONARY (Table 14) The STEM LOOKUP AND GRAMMAR TRANSLATION DICTIONARIES (Table 11) are created in two disk files by the DICTLOAD program. Referring to Table 11, the STEM LOOKUP DICTIONARY is composed of the stem part of the Master Stem Dictionary less the stem number (SN) but including the PST (paradigmatic set) codes. Each stem entry also includes the disk address of the grammar part of the dictionary record (GRAM DISK ADDRESS) and the disk address of the L.S. Compound Dictionary record (LS DISK ADDRESS) if this stem can participate as a principal word in an L.S. expression. The entries in the STEM LOOKUP DICTIONARY are arranged alphabetically and into groups by those stems that begin with the same characters. The first stem determines the first unique beginning characters and a new group is started when a shorter stem is encountered or is not equal on the same beginning characters. Access to the STEM LOOKUP DICTIONARY is accomplished with the program called BSAM to efficiently control access to two of these buffer loads simultaneously. The linkage to the GRAMMAR DICTIONARY and L.S. COMPOUND DICTIONARY is realized by relative track address and byte offset utilizing the program called BDAM, thus enabling all grammar and L.S. information to be randomly accessed. Entries in the STEM LOOKUP AND GRAMMAR DICTIONARIES include all MASTER STEM DICTIONARY records except high frequency words. Thus, words forming part of an idiom are included. The HIGH FREQUENCY WORD AND GRAMMAR DICTIONARIES are created in two disk files by the program HFC (H. F. creation). The high frequency words are selected from the MASTER STEM DICTIONARY and built into sequential fixed length records containing the high frequency source word and a memory offset (GRAM OFFSET) to the corresponding grammar information which is built into variable length records. The entries are arranged alphabetically by high frequency source word. These dictionaries are later accessed sequentially utilizing the program known as QSAM and loaded in their entirety into core memory during the translation run. The GRAMMAR DICTIONARY is a variable length with the GRAMMAR OFFSET key located with each high frequency word item. The HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY is a fixed length table which is scanned in a binary search method during translation processing. The IDIOM CORRESPONDENCE DICTIONARY is separated in two disk dictionaries composed of the source or Russian idiom expression and the corresponding target or English meaning. The target meaning dictionary includes the field: ENG. OFFSET shown in Table 13. The field ENG. OFFSET is an address off linkage which links the source dictionary part to the target meaning dictionary part. These dictionaries are built in the same computer run that builds the HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY by merging the MASTER STEM and MASTER IDIOM/LS DICTIONARIES selecting high frequency words from the MASTER STEM DICTIONARY and Russian idioms from the MASTER IDIOM/L.S. DICTIONARY. Both files are built as variable length records using the program QSAM and are loaded fully in memory during the translation run. The Russian expressions are located randomly during the translation phase by utilizing binary and sequential searches. The first word of the Russian idiom is located in the HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY. Separate tables for 2nd through 7th possible words in the same idiom are provided. The HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY for the 1st word idiom has a memory offset address (IDIOM OFFSET, table 12) to the second idiom word in the second IDIOM DICTIONARY and the second word has a memory offset address to the third idiom word in the third IDIOM DICTIONARY. Each idiom word in an IDIOM WORD DICTIONARY has a memory offset address to the next idiom word. The words are arranged in the order whereby the longest expression appears first. The corresponding English meaning is located directly with a table byte offset address associated with each Russian idiom. The L.S. COMPOUND DICTIONARY is created as a randomly accessed file utilizing the program BDAM with a relative track address and byte offset. Six programs are executed to create this dictionary and update the MASTER STEM DICTIONARY with this information. This first four steps (L.S. expression selection and high frequency word lookup, sort, main dictionary lookup and sort), are executed similarly to an actual translation run with the purpose of gathering all L.S. control numbers and grammar information together for each L.S. expression. The following step builds a single L.S. compound record for the principal word of the expression. The principal word is determined by examining the part of speech for each word in the Russian expression. The order for selection is: (a) Finite verb (b) Finite auxiliary (c) Pure noun (d) Proper noun (e) Profession or title (f) Abbreviation (g) Noun/adjective (h) Pronoun adjective (i) Pure adjective (j) Adverb High frequency words are eliminated from selection as the principal word. If no principal word is determined by the program, the expression is printed for analysis. These records are then sorted by principal word and a Master Dictionary is created. Each L.S. COMPOUND DICTIONARY record is accessed randomly during translation by relative track address and byte offset information associated with each principal word of the Russian expression. The English meaning of each expression compound is located by a byte displacement address to a table of English meanings included in the variable length compound record. Supplementary and principal word indication records are built and information from them is updated in the MASTER STEM DICTIONARY. Additional forms of the verb are updated in a second pass to produce the final updated version of the MASTER STEM DICTIONARY. The HIGH FREQUENCY and STEM DICTIONARIES are now recreated, reflecting the updated L.S. information and are now ready for translation processing. Hexadecimal Printout Format During translation, as the computer analyzes each sentence, it attaches codes to the words to express their interrelationship. On an IBM 360/65 computer system, these codes are expressed using the hexadecimal system. Whenever required, the computer prepared analysis can be printed and a hexadecimal printout is obtained. Table 24 illustrates such a printout. To give a general insight into the content of such a printout, some information is given in the following 1. The subject of the sentence (i.e., its sentence sequence number) is listed at the beginning of each subsentence unit (SSU). 2. The sentence sequence number of the predicate is indicated at the beginning of each subsentence unit (PRED). 3. Each word of the source language is numbered along the left side of Table 24 in the sequence it appears in the sentence. 4. The two pairs of numbers immediately to the right of the sentence sequence number refer to the part of speech (POS) and basic part of speech (BPQ) of the word. 10/10 means that the word is a pure noun; 20/20 is a pure adjective; 40/45 is a finite auxiliary. The assigned part of speech codes are suitable for machine translation purposes and have no necessary correlation to usual grammars. 5. The next word to the right is the word in the source language (i.e. OBYCNYl). In the example given, the word is Russian but transliterated from Cyrillic into the Latin alphabet. 6. Toward the middle of each entry is the translation of the source language word in the target language (i.e. MN - and QUESTIONS). Articles, prepositions, and auxiliaries are inserted, if necessary, before these words depending on the internal analysis. The 160 bytes of information after each word are expressed in hexadecimal. Each two digits represent a full byte of information, while one of the pair represents half a byte of information. In order to aid in the location of a particular byte, there are numbers placed among the bytes to act as reference points. These are three digit numbers followed by a dash. In the example, 008- locates byte 8 for the word OBYCNYl, which means that the next pair of digits, i.e. 20, are byte 8. So if, for instance, one were searching for byte 59 for the word OBYCNYl in the example, one would scan the hexadecimal printout for a number close to 59, in this case 056-, and count over to the third pair of digits, i.e. to digits 01. In some bytes, the number may be symbolic of a certain condition, for instance, an 08 in byte 50 means that the word must be the object of a preposition. The numbers are written in hexadecimal, that is, an alpha-numeric system with a base of 16. The maximum amount that can be written into one byte is FF hexadecimal, i.e. 255 decimal. 7. Byte 008 is a reference number which aids in the quick location of bytes. 8. TG-O is the Topical Glossary subject field of the translated word. 9. The eight digit (four bytes) following TG-(i.e. 92000104 for OBYCNYl) contain information about the synthesis of the target word (e.g. articles to be inserted, pluralization, etc.). 10. The end of the line following TG- (i.e. ORDINARY for OBYCNYl) is the word or words in the target language from which the translation is obtained. An adjustment is made in the actual translation for tense, etc., and, if the word is a verbal form, the reflexive translation may also be listed here. C. Example of Operation of SYSTRAN While Translating Between Russian Source and English Target Languages SYSTRAN translation capabilities can be demonstrated through the use of different pairs of languages. The following illustration uses Russian as the source language and English as the target language. A description is given of how the original Russian text is received, how it is read in the computer, and the operations necessary to achieve the final translation. The selection of the computer for machine translation system is based on its universality. Due to hardware limitations, any large-scale translation system must be written in a language closest to that of the computer. The Russian text to be translated is first typewritten on the IBM magnetic tape Selectric typewriter and recorded in the MTST code on magnetic tape. The information from the MTST tapes is converted and placed onto magnetic tapes which can be read directly by an IBM 360/65 (see Fig. 1). The principles of the applied logic within the translation system could be put into operation on any 3rd generation computer, but it should be reprogrammed in the closest computer language for the particular hardware utilized. The Russian text recorded in MTST code on tape is translated to IBM 360/65 coded format and recorded on magnetic tape by the Model 9209 converter, manufactured and sold by Litton Systems, Inc. The converter is described in Technical Bulletin TB(S) 69/0001/00C dated January 30, 1970 which is incorporated herein by reference. The Russian text to be used as an example is taken from a Russian text appearing in Cyrillic characters in the journal NAUCNOTEXNICESKAIA INFORMATSIIA (Nov. 6, 1970) entitled "The Evaluation of the Quality of Automatic Translation". By way of example, the steps of translation are given for the fifth sentence of the last paragraph on page 32 of the text. Fig. 4 illustrates schematically what takes place in the high speed core of the computer at the time the fifth sentence is being read in. For purposes of explanation, the Russian text in MTST coded characters are schematically illustrated in the upper left hand corner of Fig. 1 on magnetic tape 10a. The complete Russian text is actually magnetically recorded on magnetic tape 10a and a conventional magnetic tape transport 10 used in the IBM 360/65 computer system serially reads the text presenting the text for storage in a core memory 12 which also forms a part of the IBM 360/65 computer system. The MTST program accomplishes this operation. The words of the sentence in core memory 12 are illustrated schematically to the left one by one. A continuation is expressed by three dots and the period is the last word. At that time, the core memory already contains three dictionaries read beforehand by the LOADTXT program from disk file 14. The three dictionaries are the HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY, the RUSSIAN IDIOM CORRESPONDENCE DICTIONARY and the ENGLISH MEANING DICTIONARY. The ENGLISH MEANING DICTIONARY contains the English Language equivalent(s) for the Russian idioms. All three dictionaries change if the source and target languages change, but the same program, namely, LOADTXT, reads them in and arranges them for the purposes of text processing at the beginning of the translation. Usually during translation, a whole text is read into the computer in one pass. A single sentence was used for illustrative purposes only. The HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY contains high frequency words as well as first words of idioms. These words are arranged in alphabetic sequence to make core binary search possible. The Russian IDIOM CORRESPONDENCE DICTIONARY contains idiom tables arranged according to the second and following words of an idiom. Each time a match has been achieved with a word which may function as the first word of an idiom, possible second words to that idiom are matched with following text words. The ENGLISH MEANING DICTIONARY contains the English equivalents to the idiomatic expressions. The program LOADTXT scans the Russian source text comparing each word for equality with the HF WORD entries in the HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY (see Table 12). When the first word of an idiom is found, the second and subsequent words of idiomatic phrases in the second and subsequent IDIOM DICTIONARIES are compared with subsequent words in the Russian source text. Whenever a complete match has been achieved between sequences of Russian source words and all words for one complete idiomatic phrase in IDIOM DICTIONARIES of the IDIOM CORRESPONDENCE DICTIONARY, the address offset with the last word of the idiom is used to obtain the English equivalent of the idiom is taken from the ENGLISH MEANING DICTIONARY and is attached to the first word of the idiom. A typical selection of the HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY is shown in Table 16. From the selected sentence, the Russian word KOTORYE appears in the H.F. table. As can be seen, most of the forms which can be derived from the Russian stem KOTOR appear as high frequency words. This is due to the fact that these words occur quite frequently in Russian texts introducing qualifying subordinate clauses. All of the words of a text, in this case, of the selected sentence, which were found in the HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY are supplied with a so-called "grammar offset". During the translation phase, the GRAMMAR DICTIONARY (see Fig. 4) is kept in the high speed core memory 12 and contains total grammar and target meaning information for the high frequency words. The grammar offset determines how far such grammatical and target meaning information is from a common reference point (i.e. from the beginning of the table) and in this sense can be referred to as an address linkage. First words of idioms are indicated in the HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY by special codes in the field named IDIOM OFFSET which is monitored by the LOADTXT program. Whenever the LOADTXT program detects an idiom, the meaning of the idiom is located and is attached to the first word. The LOADTXT program puts text words for which a match has been achieved either as an idiom or as a high frequency word, in a high frequency file on a magnetic tape. All the words for which no match has been achieved are put in a low frequency file. An idiom in the SYSTRAN System can serve syntactic purposes. The two words "NAPRIMER," (NAPRIMER and the following comma) have been entered as an idiom with the purpose to eliminate the comma from considerations during the syntactic analysis phase, thus assuring the correct location of subject and predicate. It should be noted here that in spite of the fact that a word participates in an idiom, if it is not a member of a high frequency word table, it still undergoes a regular dictionary lookup. As a result, it is written into the so-called "low frequency" file. Although T. and P. together with the conjunction "I" form an idiom, they still undergo their individual dictionary lookup later, due to the fact that they are not members of the high frequency table. A typical page of the IDIOM CORRESPONDENCE DICTIONARY is illustrated in Table 17. The idiom I.T.P. occurs as the ninth idiom. The listing of this page illustrates how the idioms are being kept for reference and update purposes. At the beginning of each translation, a program places the words of all idioms into tables. The first word of every idiom is merged with the HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY, consecutive words are arranged in separate tables (i.e. 2nd, 3rd . . . 7th IDIOM CORRESPONDENCE DICTIONARIES) and the meanings are placed into the MEANING FILE. Fig. 5 graphically illustrates the sequence of operation involved in the main dictionary lookup and the type of procedures that take place in the high speed core memory at that time. As mentioned before, all the words which are not found in the HIGH FREQUENCY WORD DICTIONARY are put into a so-called "low frequency" file which was recorded on magnetic tapes. Subsequently, these words are alphabetically sorted and attached with a serial number code identifying their order in the original Russian source text. The words are brought in now in alphabetic sequence into the high speed core memory 12 to undergo the main dictionary lookup. During main dictionary lookup, the STEM LOOKUP DICTIONARY is used. The dictionary is in the same alphabetic sequence that the text words in the LOW FREQUENCY FILE were sorted into. The dictionary encompasses all the words in the source language and associated with each word grammar codes and meanings in several subject fields are attached. In the case of those languages which are highly inflected, like Russian, the dictionary contains mostly stems and hence the same STEM LOOKUP DICTIONARY. During the dictionary lookup, a stem and ending analysis takes place and on the basis of such an analysis, additional grammatical information is obtained. Referring to Fig. 5, the first word of the sentence being used as the illustration appears in alphabetic sequence is OBYCNYl. The illustration shows how this word is matched with the dictionary entry. A portion of the dictionary is presented with the dictionary codes presently available. The dictionary contains OBYCN indicating that this is an adjective and has declensional pattern 197, and also the code "PS" in field L.S. shown in Table 4 indicates that it can be a principal word and a supplementary word of a compound. The word in question has a general meaning "usual". General meaning is given by the fact that after PS there is a zero (0) which means "general glossary". A one (1) means "physics glossary", and a three (3) means "computer glossary". The meanings are "usual", "usual" and "ordinary". Also illustrated here is another entry from the dictionary which, immediately following the word OBCYNO, is in the adverbial from which the meaning "usually". During dictionary lookup, the program MDL first attempts to match the full word with a dictionary entry. If unsuccessful, then one letter is dropped and comparison is reattempted. If unsuccessful, then a second letter is dropped, and at that point, a match is obtained with OBYCN. At this juncture, on the basis of the morphological code 197, the routine SYSNOUN within MDL compares the chopped off endings with all allowable endings which may follow this stem to decide a certain form. In this case, the ending is Yl, which means that the stem form functions here as nominative singular masculine. The ending A4 would have been nominative singular feminine. OE would have been nominative neuter singular. OGO would have been genitive masculine or neuter singular, and also accusative if it refers to an animate being, etc. In addition to obtaining the grammatical codes from the dictionary during dictionary lookup, the operation attaches all other codes from the dictionary (Preposition, Case, Translation, etc.) as well as meanings with synthesis code to the word. The next text word would be PEREVOD. The illustration presents all the codes and meanings that are attached to PEREVOD in the dictionary and also signifies that PEREVOD has been entered with paradigmatic set number 044. This number indicates that the possible endings that can be attached to this word are A, U, OM, and E in singular, and Y, OV, AM, Y, AMI and AX in plural. After the paradigmatic code number 044, a Russian word appears which indicates an example of the type of declension that may take place with 044. Note that NOV (appearing at mid-page) carries code number 197, the same code number which is attached to OBYCN. This identical numbering means that both words have the same declension pattern. Such a coding system facilitates the work of the native Russians who are continually adding new words to the low frequency dictionary. During MAIN DICTIONARY LOOKUP, all the words receive grammatical and target meaning information (with synthesis codes) for all those subject fields in which the words may function with different meanings. After such a lookup, a sort program sorts the words again into original text sequence using the attached serial number and stores them on tape or disk in a sorted low frequency file. The sorted words are then brought back into the core memory 12 in two files. One is the HIGH FREQUENCY FILE and the other is the RESTORED LOW FREQUENCY FILE. The computer program GETSENTN now merges the words from the two files and for each sentence in the computer memory a so-called analysis area is set up where the sentence can be syntactically analyzed resulting in a computer intermediate language which expresses structure and semantic functions of all the words in the sentence and their syntactic interconnections. Fig. 6 illustrates schematically that the program LSLOOKUP (LSLU) determines the first two words of the sentence to be a Limited Semantic (L.S.) compound, and the meaning "human translation" was attached instead of "usual" or "ordinary translation". On the top of the Figure, the first three words of the sentence appear. At this time, the program LSLU reads into the core memory 12 from disk 14 the portions of the LIMITED SEMANTICS DICTIONARY which are relevant to the principal word of this compound, which is PEREVOD. Every expression for which the word PEREVOD (translation "transfer") functions as a principal word is being read into the high speed core memory. A list of entries appears on the bottom left and right sides of the page. The left group contains those LIMITED SEMANTICS DICTIONARY entries where the word PEREVOD appears at the beginning, and the right side contains a few entries where the word PEREVOD appears as a second word preceded by an adjective. The particular matching compound is encircled. The word OBYCN carries an indication (L.S. II) that it may participate in a LIMITED SEMANTICS compound. The LIMITED SEMANTICS record of the word PEREVOD is arranged in a way that first all the compounds are listed where this principal word is the first word then all those where it is the second, third, fourth, and so on. The compound shown here has been located among those expressions where the word PEREVOD functions as the second word of a compound and there is no third member. The reflexive indicator in the second line applies in only those instances when the principal word is a verb, so it can be disregarded in this case. In the comparison area in the high speed core memory (shown) the compounds were looked up belonging to PEREVOD where PEREVOD is the second word of a compound. The LIMITED SEMANTICS numbers L.S. #A23 and L.S. #B39 are attached to the words OBYCN and PEREVOD by the programs CLS1, CLS2 and CLS3 during the creation of the L.S. DICTIONARY FILE. The program LSLU detects the LIMITED SEMANTICS words and compares the L.S. numbers against the LIMITED SEMANTICS entries for PEREVOD. Finding a match between the numbers A23 and B39 attached to PEREVOD and between these same numbers as they occur after dictionary lookup attached to the words in the sentence, this compound is translated by LSLU as "human translation". The actual L.S. numbers are sequentially assigned each time a new L.S. compound dictionary is generated. They are unique numbers and each word can have only one such number. The numbers are arranged in exactly the same sequence as the words appear in the compounds. A program organizes different groups according to the position of the principal word. Such organization is taken into account during the L.S. lookup. As far as this sentence is concerned, only the first two words have been located as an L.S. compound, and in the hexadecimal printout which illustrates the generated computer intermediate language there is a corresponding mark indicating that these words form a compound. Table 18 illustrates a typical page from the listings of LIMITED SEMANTICS compounds. The listings correspond to the arrangement where these compounds are kept on magnetic tapes for update purposes. In order to use the listings during translation, a special program arranges them on disks, assigns each participating word an L.S. number, locates the principal word and sets up an actual direct sub-system of compounds in the source language which is used by the translation system. Table 24 is a reproduction of a computer printout which illustrates the analysis area in the computer core memory at the time the sentence is analyzed. On the top of the page, the parameter information appears as an exact duplication of the instructions that the system received before being called upon to carry out the translation. It contains those parameters under which the translation should be carried out. Its appearance or for reference so that when desired, the analyst should be able to locate the conditions under which the System carried out the translation and instructions the System used to carry out the translation. The parameter information is explained later. The STRPASS programs generate syntactic codes to express the interconnections between words in a sentence. The following describes the most important of the codes generated by STRPASSES for the first eight words of the example Russian sentence shown in Figure 4. Byte 111 of the first word contains the sequence number i.e. 02 of the subject of the first sentence unit, and byte 108 contains similar information i.e. 03 of the graduate for the first sentence unit (main clause). These two informations also appear printed separately on the top left side of the Table 24. Byte 16 of the first word contains the sentence sequence number of the second word (02). This information in this byte expresses the fact that the first word belongs to the second word in an agreement relationship, and the second word is the principal word of the syntactic unit. It can also be said that the first word "points" or is linked to the second word in byte 16. Byte 26 of the second word points to the first word of the source text indicating that the first word of this agreement relationship is the first word of the sentence. Byte 21 of the third word, MOJET, points to word 04. The 21-31 relationship expresses an infinitive government structure, i.e., the word which governs the infinitive contains the sentence sequence number of the infinitive (03) in byte 21, while the infinitive contains the sentence sequence number of its governor in byte 31. Byte 18 of word 04, OBLADAT6, points to the word 05, MASSO1, expressing that the latter is the direct object of OBLADAT6. Byte 28 of MASSO1 points back to word 04, OBLADAT6, expressing the direct object dependency relationship. Byte 20 of MASSO1 points to word 06, NEDOSTATKOV, and byte 30 of NEDOSTATKOV points back to word 05, MASSO1. These codes express adnominal genitive relationship. The comma, word 07, had 'FF' in byte 51, expressing that it is making a sentence cut. The first seven words in the sentence contain 'Fl' in byte 140. This 'Fl' means that they belong to a main clause. Starting with word 08, the Fl changes to 01, a signalling that a qualifying clause begins. The qualifying clause initiator KOTORYE contains 06 in byte 52, which means that it refers to the sixth word in the sentence, i.e., to the word NEDOSTATKOV. NEDOSTATKOV contains 08 in byte 52, pointing to KOTORYE. Word OF is an opening parenthesis (part of speech DO). All the words which belong to the sentence unit surrounded by parentheses are marked with '50' in byte 148. The SYSTRAN Dictionaries contain both slashed and single meanings. Sometimes the person who reads the translation prefers two meanings separated by slashes, in the case of multiple meanings. Others prefer the closest possible meaning. The parameter slash indicates to the System that slashed entries should be printed. In the absence of this parameter, each time a slashed entry occurs in the target language, the meaning which most closely reflects the real meaning of the source language is printed. The parameter entry W indicates that during the translation process, the console typewriter should indicate each time 50 sentences have been translated. The asterisks indicate the facility to insert additional programs for special printouts, diagnostics, etc. G stands for GETSENTN (get sentence). The syntactic passes 0-4 are denoted by their respective numbers - 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. L is the L.S. program. X means Lexical Routines. P represents prepositions, R - rearrangement, E English synthesis, or the synthesis into whatever target language it takes place, D - diagnostics, P- print, and L - Syntactic level program which is only at the end because it was added at a later stage to the system. Next to the parameter information is the date when the translation was carried out followed by an indication as to which topical glossary had preference during translation. Should no meaning be available in the indicated glossaries, general meanings are used. The sentence sequence number in the translation is next followed by the page number indexing each particular sentence. On the following line, SSU means the subsentence unit. The subsentence units are established during various levels in the analysis phase. Each subsentence unit should have a predicate and a subject if the predicate is not impersonal. The sentence sequence number of the subject and predicate is printed next to the SSU indication. Each time a new subsentence unit begins, there is a new SSU print. Preceding each source language word is a sentence sequence number. On this same line appear the primary and secondary parts of speed followed by the source language word as it appeared in the input. Primary parts of speech (POS) broadly reflect the parts of speech function of the word while the secondary POS further specifies such function. Primary POS's have been selected to enable automatic branching and consequently immediate entering of the routines controlled by the parts of speech. Next is a target language meaning and an indication whether the particular word under consideration functioned as a member of a compound or a member of an idiom. Also between the source language print and the meaning, certain symbolic letters may appear indicating the lexical subroutine which was called upon during the translation of this word. Such lexical routines are arranged on the basis of their symbolic notation in a binary table and each time a particular word occurs which carries an indication that its translation may require a lexical routine a binary search is carried out among the lexical routines to establish which routine should go into effect. The 160 bytes appearing after each word which is analyzed for translation purposes is a unique SYSTRAN feature. These bytes contain compressed dictionary information, addresses to additional information, and,as a result of the analysis, coded information which reflects the syntactic and semantic interconnections of all words in the sentence. The information placed in these bytes by sequences of programs can also be regarded as a computer intermediate language which analyzed the sentence to such degree that automatic translation of the sentence can be carried out. The condensed dictionary information, as well as the variable length information which is cross-referenced from the bytes area, is attached to the individual words either as a result of the dictionary lookup or, if the entry was a high frequency word, the displacement was used to retrieve and attach the information from the high frequency grammar and meaning table at the time when the analysis area was set up for the particular sentence. Table 19 gives a resume of all the information possible in the 160 bytes of the analysis area shown in Appendix A. Tables 20 and 21 show the codes for the primary and secondary parts of speech. It should be noted here that some modifications take place whenever the part of speech approach is applied to other source languages, although the basic semantic characteristics of the speech structure is used consistently. For example, the Russian qualifying clause initiator KOTORYE carries a particular part of speech code - 7C. The same 7C is being applied in every source language which has a corresponding clause initiator. The same approach is used for other clause initiators, for certain types of adverbs, etc. The contents of the 160 bytes is exhaustive. Additional information, available on the basis of various addresses in the byte fields, is printed after the 160th byte. Such information is, for example, the C/P (case preposition) information which is case translation applicable in the case of those languages which are highly inflected and the words function in different cases. Such cases are translated into the target language by different prepositions which are indicated in the C/P field. In addition, particular source language prepositions must be translated in different ways depending upon what type of codes are attached to the individual words for the translation of prepositions. Word 02 PEREVOD carries the preposition code 14 (in the English Preposition Table, Table 15 ) for the Russian preposition PRI, meaning that should this word be governed by the Russian preposition PRI, then the translation should be DURING. The same Russian word may also strongly govern the Russian preposition NA (22 on the English Preposition Table) indicating that if PEREVOD governs NA and NA governs in accusative, the translation should be INTO. The last line contains target meaning information and synthesis codes. The first word in the sentence, the adjective OBYCNY1, for example, has 90 in the first byte. This indication is made up of the target language part of speech indication (DPQ), which is 80 for adjectives. Added to this is 10, which indicates that AN is used to modify this adjective, since it begins with a vowel. Byte 2 is not used for adjectives at the present time. Byte 3 indicates which word is to be synthesized. In this case, since there is only one word in the English meaning, the number 1 has been placed there. Byte 4 contains the comparative and superlative codes for the adjective. In this case, one can say "more ordinary" or "most ordinary" rather than adding the endings "er" and "est" as, for instance, one would for "black". The noun PEREVOD, the second word in Byte 1, has 40 indicating the DPQ for nouns. 10 was not added here since the noun does not begin with a vowel. If it had begun with a vowel, a 50 would have been indicated. Byte 2 holds the code for articles. Byte 3 contains the sequence number of the word to be synthesized. In this case, the second word changes. The 04 in Byte 4 indicates that the plural of the noun is made by adding "s". The verb OBLADAT6 (fourth word) had CO in Byte 1, which, again is the DPQ of the word. 10 also would have been added if the verb in the English has a vowel beginning. This is used for the participles which are generated from the verb and which may require articles. Also indicated in this byte is the sequence number of the word to be synthesized. It may be left out, as here, if only one word appears in the English meaning. Byte 2 has a code if there is a different meaning in the English for the reflexive form of the verb. Byte 3 contains the code reflecting the choice of translation in English for the verb if it appears in the reflexive in Russian. Byte 4 indicates the conjugation pattern of the verb. The computer prepared intermediate language, expressed symbolically in the bytes area, makes it possible for a synthesis program to carry out the actual translation. All the computer generated codes as well as target language requirements are taken into consideration during the final translation process. Words are placed into the required form, phrases are built up, and the word order is determined based on the requirements of the target language. If the target language has articles (i.e. English) definite and indefinite articles are placed before noun phrases whenever required. The multiple meaning problems are handled on four levels: idioms, L.S. compounds, lexical routines, and generalized routines to resolve semantic problems. These routines consider the influence of semantic categories within defined syntactic relationships. To words with multiple meanings, generalized routines are attached. They should be interrogated in a sequence as they follow each other. MEMORY SWITCHES STRPASS 1 is the most important syntactic pass through the sentence. The program carries out its operation right to left and "remembers" the various conditions with the help of so-called memory switches. These switches are set to remember the types of words that have been encountered previously, and to indicate to the program the type of decision to be made at individual words. Routines are initiated by the parts of speech. The remembering is carried out on the basis of the types of words encountered. Certain words "clear" all these switches, i.e., they signify certain breaks in the sentence in regard to syntactic interconnections. Table 25 illustrates the sequence with which the switches are set for this analysis field illustrated in Table 24, for the example Russian sentence. Each word in the example is indicated by its sentence sequence number shown to the left in Table 24. After the sentence sequence number all those switches which were "on" at the time the word was analyzed by the program of stress 1, are printed with their sylic names. At the time words 1D and 1C are encountered, switches are not yet set. When 1B is analyzed, the NSW (noun switch) is set by 1C. This is how "P." is remembered. At word 1A, the reserve noun switch (RNS) is set with word 1C. At word 19, only the ILI switch is set. This switch was set by the Russian conjunction I at the same time the reserve noun switch was cleared. At word 18, it can be seen that the noun switch was set with word 19, and that the ILI switch is still on. At the time word 17 is reached, the noun switch (NSW) and the left agreement unloading switch (LAG) are set, indicating that an agreement relationship started, i.e., word 18 modifies word 19. (After it is established that the preposition (word 17) governs the noun (word 19), both NSW and LAG are cleared). Word 16 sets the NSW. The next noun, word 15, causes the noun switch set by word 16, to become a reserve noun switch, while the noun switch is then set by word 15. Word 14 will be recognized as modifying word 15, and consequently the LAG switch will be set. When a new noun (word 13) is encountered, the previous noun switch will become a reserve noun switch, and the left agreement unloading switch (LAG) will become a reserve left agreement unloading switch (RLA). At word 11, the RNS will be set by word 13 since a new noun (word 12) has been encountered. This noun will not set a new switch since it is preceded by a comma, which prevents immediate syntactic relationships to the left. The comma has cleared the reserve noun and reserve left agreement unloading switches, and set the comma switch (COM). The beginning parentheses, part of speech, OF clears all the switches. New switches are set with words OE and OD. (NSW, LAG). Afater finding that word OC governs OE, and that word OD is in agreement with OE, these switches are cleared. Word OB, being an infinitive, sets the infinitive (INF) and verb form (VER) switches. After it is established that OA governs the infinitive, only the verb form switch remains. Due to its particular function, the word KOTORYE sets the NSW. The comma before KOTORYE clears all the switches, and when the word NEDOSTATKOV (06) is encountered, only the comma switch is set. Word 06 sets the noun switch. This switch was changed to the reserve noun switch when word 05, MASSO1, was encountered. After it is established that word 04 governs the noun switch, such switch is cleared. Word 04 sets the INF switch, which is in turn cleared after it has been established that word 03 governs 04. At that point, only the verb switch and comma switch are set. Word 02 sets the noun switch, and word 01 the LAG switch. These switches are still on when the beginning of the sentence, i.e., a first zero word (dummy word) is encountered. It should be noted that only by having a word area (160 bytes) cleared and considered before every sentence can it be assured that indications about the status of the first word can be given, and that looping operations can begin with the first word. The final English target language translation of the Russian source language text shown in Fig. 4 is shown in Table 23. In addition to the uniqueness of the translation approach, special MACRO instructions were developed to facilitate a more direct communication with the computer. The advantage of these special instructions, expressly developed for machine translation purposes over other computer languages is, that they consider the direct requirements of natural language translation. The MACRO instructions are converted using a special MACRO assembly and this assembly at the same time eliminates most of the coding errors. In the following, the MACRO instructions inherent to the SYSTRAN System are listed with a brief description of their function. CMPWC - Compare beginning characters of the source language and branch under certain conditions. CMPWD - Compare source word and branch if certain conditions are met. CMPWE - Compare the end characters of the source language and branch under certain conditions. CMPWP - Compare a word pointer (address indication) with another pointer in the sentence. DICTM - Put in a special meaning or any word overruling any other dictionary meaning. GOTO - Branch to another location. IFOFF - Test a switch and branch if off. IFON - Test a switch and branch if on. MVEHM - Move the analysis area of a homograph word to replace the analysis area of a word in the original sentence sequence. SCANL/SCANR - Scan left or right in the sentence, within sentence or subsentence boundaries looking for certain grammar codes, words or any other information pertinent to the translation program. The scan also allows the jumping of words, phrases or clauses. SETBN - Set a bit on (Indicate certain information in the most economic way). SETBF - Turn off the information set on. SETBM - Merge the information in 16 bits (2 bytes). SETCH - Set a character equal to the value of another character. SETMA - Set a meaning to appear after the main meaning of a word. SETMB - Set a meaning to appear before the main meaning of a word. SETM - Set the main meaning of a word and mark it translated. SETMT - Make the source word equal to the target meaning. SETTR - Mark a word translated. SETWI - Set indicator equal to sentence sequence number of a word pointed to by a word pointer. SETWP - Set a word pointer to a specified word or dictionary meaning entry. SMSG - Provide a snap dump of the analysis area preceded by an identifying message. SWOFF - Set a memory switch off. SWON - Set a memory switch on. TESTB - Test a set of bits relative to another set of bits and branch if the condition is satisfied. TESTX - Test contents of a series of bits or test character relative to another test character. The modularity of the translation system enables the inclusion of more MACRO instructions as the necessity during the processing of natural languages arises. TABLE 23 SYSTRAN TRANSLATION OF RUSSIAN SENTENCE SHOWN IN FIG. 4 Human translation can possess a mass of deficiencies, which can in principle be absent from machine translation (for instance, the hypertrophy of the features of the individual style of a human translator in the translated text and so on).

Claims: A method for translation between source and target natural languages using a programmable digital computer system, the steps comprising: (a) storing in a main memory of the computer system a source text to be translated; (b) scanning and comparing such stored source words with dictionaries of source language words stored in a memory and for each source text word for which a match is found, storing in a file in main memory each word, and in association with each such word, coded information derived from such dictionary for use in translation of such word, the coded information including memory offset address linkages to a memory in the computer system where grammar and target language translations for the word are stored; (c) analyzing the source text words in its file of words, a complete sentence at a time, and converting the same into a sentence in the target language utilizing the coded information and including the steps of (1) utilizing the memory offset address linkages for obtaining the target language translations of words from a memory; and (2) reordering the target language translation into the proper target language sequence; the step of analyzing additionally comprising the steps of analyzing each source word in multiple passes through each sentence of the source text, assigning codes thereto, considering all the codes which previous passes have attached to a word and assigning target language synthesis codes attached to the meaning with which the code functions in the sentence, placing the word into a form corresponding to the target language dependent upon the analysis and consideration of all relevant codes assigned to the words, characterized in that said dictionaries of source language words comprise entries containing a source language stem, the coded information associated to such entry comprising an address linkage (PST) relating to the set of valid endings permitted for said source language stem, and in that, for each source text word, the step of comparing such word with dictionaries of source language words comprises the steps of : inspecting said dictionaries to determine whether a particular entry thereof matches said source text word, if no match is found, dropping the last letter of said source text word ; and repeating the sequence of said steps of inspecting and dropping the last letter until a match is found with a source language stem entry of said dictionaries, the number of letters dropped being less than a predetermined number representing the maximum ending length for said source text word. A method according to claim 1, wherein said dictionaries of source language words further comprise full form entries containing invariable source language words. A method according to claim 1, wherein, in the case where said step of inspecting reveals that a particular stem entry matches a source text word having at least one letter dropped, the chopped-off ending of said source text word, made of the sequence of dropped letters, is compared to the set of valid endings permitted for said stem entry and, upon detecting an equality in this comparison, grammar information is stored such as the gender, number, declensional case or conjugational tense corresponding to the identified valid ending. A method according to claim 1 including the steps of : storing a dictionary of high frequency source words and associated offset address linkages, the offset address linkages identifying the storage location of grammar and meaning information for the source words ; storing a dictionary of low frequency source words in association with grammar code meanings for each word ; comparing the source language text words with the high frequency dictionary words and, upon detecting an equality with a word, storing the word and associated offset address linkages together in a high frequency file ; and comparing the source language text words with the low frequency dictionary words and upon detecting an equality, storing the word and the associated grammar code meanings in a low frequency file. A method according to claim 4, including the step of merging the words of the high and low frequency files together. A method according to claim 4, wherein the high frequency dictionary has frequently encountered source words including prepositions and conjunctions. A method according to claim 4, wherein : second and succeeding idiom words, if any, in a source idiom are stored in at least one dictionary in memory ; the high frequency dictionary includes the first words of source language idioms and associated therewith address linkages to second and subsequent words in the same idiom which are located in the idiom dictionary, the first word and subsequent words, if any, of an idiom having an associated target language meaning stored in association therewith ; and during comparison with the high frequency dictionary comprising the steps of : (a) detecting those words that are equal and are first words of idioms ; (b) utilizing the offset address linkages to locate the additional word or words in the same idiom located in the idiom dictionary ; (c) comparing the located further words in the idiom with the words in the source text which follow the first idiom word for an equality and ; (d) upon detecting such an equality, storing the first idiom word together with the target language meaning into the high frequency file. A method according to claim 7, comprising the step of storing each one of the second and subsequent idiom words together with an idiom tag into the high frequency file, the idiom tag designating that the word is not the first word of the idiom. A method according to claim 8, comprising the step of storing the first word of an idiom together with a tag into the high frequency file, the tag designating that the word is the first word of an idiom. A method according to claim 9, wherein the step of analyzing comprises the step of selecting the target meaning associated with a first idiom word as the translation of the first and subsequent idiom words. A method according to claim 4, including the step of storing an indication in association with the words in the low frequency file, of whether the words are principal and/or participating words in limited semantic compounds. A method, according to claim 11, wherein a separate file is stored containing limited semantic numbers for each principal word, the limited semantic numbers indicating all participating words, the limited semantic numbers of participating words being attached to the principal words in the same sequence in which the participating words form compound expressions with the principal word. A method, according to claim 11, in which during scanning and comparing with dictionaries, information is attached to the principal word concerning all the compound expressions within which the principal word may function as key word in a compound, the attached information containing either sequences of limited semantic numbers or an address of an auxiliary storage device where such information is located, and including the additional steps of bringing into a main working memory from the auxiliary storage device during analyzing the file of words, the limited semantic numbers assigning a subject field code to the source text, if the same compound expression of the source language indicated by the limited semantic numbers have different target meanings, then selection of the correct meaning for the compound depending upon the subject field code in which the translation takes place. A method, according to claim 12, wherein during the steps of analyzing and searching the file of words to establish whether a principal word is surrounded by supplementary words, if supplemental words are established, the limited semantic numbers of the supplementary words are compared against the limited semantic numbers stored in a limited semantic dictionary for each principal word, if a match is encountered, translating the principal and supplementary words forming a compound into the corresponding meaning. A method, according to claim 14, including the steps of declining or conjugating the principal word according to synthesis codes of the target language and attaching these codes to each compound. A method, according to claim 1, wherein during the steps of scanning, comparing and storing, there is included the step of attaching part of speech codes to source text words and wherein during the step of analyzing there is included the step of attaching parts of speech codes used to branch into a required routine including the step of adding the value of part of speech to a fixed address. A method according to claim 1, the step of analyzing additionally comprising the step of keeping track of previously encountered conditions by setting a series of memory switches, each time a new part of speech is encountered a series of previously set switches are selectively turned off while additional switch or switches are selectively turned on, and including the step of executing a routine for interrogating the state of switches in a predetermined order. A method, according to claim 17, wherein during the step of analyzing there is included the step of assigning each word of the sentence definite coded information as to whether it belongs to a main clause or subordinate clause, and including routines assigned for searching source words within such clauses for predicate(s) and subject(s). A method, according to claim 18, in which during the step of analyzing there is included the step of supplying each source word in a sentence with pointers which express the interdependency relationships among all words in the sentence. A method according to claim 1, the step of analyzing additionally comprising the steps of analyzing a sequence of words in the source language within phrases and clauses in relation to the target language word sequence, the target language word sequence being expressed symbolically by assigned numbers and printing out the translation of the words taking into consideration each source word, and comprising the additional steps of placing the translated words formed after analyzing in a print area in a sequence specified by the relationships between the source and target languages and set up previously by the numbers given after each word and transferring the translation when the print area is filled either directly onto a printer or onto a temporary auxiliary storage device.

Inventors: TOMA, PETER AORANGI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
Applicants: GACHOT S.A.
Application year: 1987
Main classification: G06F15
IPC codes: G06F17