AIR PARTIAL EXPANSION REFRIGERATION FOR CRYOGENIC AIR SEPARATION

Abstract: Improved means of producing the refrigeration required for any fractional distillation air separation process. The improved refrigeration technique causes the distillation columns to operate more efficiently, and thereby permits increased recovery and/or purity of product at lower energy input. Refrigeration air is partially expanded in expander (313), then condensed by exchanging latent heat with depressurized kettle liquid in (314), and the resulting liquid air is split and used to reflux both columns (307) and (305) via pump (316) and valve (315), respectively.

Description: Air Partial Expansion Refrigeration for Cryogenic Air Separation Technical Field This invention relates to processes and apparatus for separating air into oxygen of any purity and optional coproduct argon via cryogenic fractional distillation. The invention makes possible a substantial reduction in the energy hitherto required for these products, by incorporating a novel refrigeration method which increases the efficiency of the fractional distillations. Background Art Conventional cryogenic air separation processes normally involve at least two fractional distillation columns: a "low pressure" (LP) column, from which is withdrawn fluid oxygen bottom product of specified purity plus gaseous nitrogen overhead product, plus a "high pressure rectifier" which receives the feed air, provides reboil to the LP column and liquid nitroqen (LNL) reflux __. for both columns by indirect exchange of latent heat between the two columns, and provides oxygen-enriched liquid air bottom product (kettle liquid) which is subsequently fed to the LP column. The conventional flowsheets provide the bulk of the refrig¬ eration necessary for the overall separation process in either of two conventional manners: by work-expanding either part of the HP rectifier overhead nitrogen to exhaust pressure (slightly below LP column overhead pressure), or expanding part of the feed air to LP column intermediate height pressure. U.S. Patent 3327488 illus¬ trates the above two approaches in the same flowsheet, although for economic reasons usually only one or the other is used. The refrigeration compensates for heat leaks, heat exchanger inefficiency, and other effects. Even with the most modern and efficient expanders, there is still required an expander flow of between about 8 and 15% of the inlet air flow to provide the necessary refrigeration, dependent on the size and design of the separation plant. This flow represents a loss of process efficiency, which can be manifested in various ways: lower recovery and/or purity of oxygen than would otherwise be possible; lower recovery and/or purity of coproduct argon; more machinery (and capital cost) to achieve acceptable recoveries and purities; or lower 0„ delivery pressure than would otherwise be possible. The conventional refrigeration techniques have no beneficial effect on the efficiency of operation of the fractional distilla- tion columns. Column efficiency is indicated by closeness of operating and equilibrium lines, that is, by the absence of mixing of streams of greatly differing composition and/or temperature. A new refrigeration technique which interacts with the distillation columns so as to make them operate more efficiently would be advan- tageous even if the refrigeration technique per se were no more efficient than the conventional refrigeration techniques. That is one objective of the present disclosure. One alternative means for providing refrigeration has been disclosed in the pri.or art which may beneficially interact with a distillation column. As disclosed in U.S. Patent 4543115 and British Patent 1271419, it is possible to work-expand part of the supply air to an intermediate pressure which is sufficiently higher than LP column pressure such that the partially expanded air will exchange latent heat with LP column intermediate height liquid in an intermediate reboiler. The air totally condenses while providing intermediate reboil to the LP column. The liquid air is subsequently depressurized to LP column pressure and fed to a height above the intermediate reboiler height. The LP column operates more effici¬ ently due to the intermediate reboil below the feed point. On the other hand, the reduced pressure ratio of expansion of the refrig¬ eration air necessitates a greater mass flow to obtain a given amount of refrigeration. Thus more air bypasses the HP rectifier, and the separation is made more difficult. This effect largely negates any benefit from improved LP column efficiency. Overall, the absence of a net thermodynamic benefit coupled with the disad¬ vantage of requiring an additional item of capital equipment (the intermediate reboiler) have prevented this refrigeration technique from being used in any known application during the 15 years it has been publicly disclosed. What is needed, and one objective of this invention, are improvements to this mode of refrigeration for an air separation process which further improve column operating efficiency, which reduce the amount of air required to be fed to the expander, and which reduce the amount and cost of added capital equipment. Furthermore, it is desired to obtain these improvements in flow¬ sheets for the production of high purity oxygen plus coproduct argon, in addition to the more conventional flowsheets for the production of low to medium purity oxygen or high purity nitrogen. It is known to reboil the bottom of the LP column by latent heat exchange with any of three gases: HP rectifier overhead N_; partially condensing feed air (U.S. Patents 3113854, 3371496, 3327489, 3688313, and 4578095); or totally condensing feed air (U.S. Patents 3210951, 4208199, and 4410343). Similarly it is known to evaporate the liquid oxygen bottom product of the LP column to gaseous oxygen product by latent heat exchange with any of the same three gases. U.S. Patents 3113854, 3371496, 3327489, and 4560398 disclose partial condensation LOXBOIL, while 3210951, 4133662, 4410343, and 4507134 disclose total condensation LOXBOIL. U.S. Patents 3210951 and 4410343 both show a single heat " exchanger in which about 40 to 56% of the feed air is totally condensed to provide both LOXBOIL and LP column reboil, and then the liquid air is divided and fed to both columns. When the LP column is reboiled by HP rectifier N«, whereas LOXBOIL is via air condensation, the LOXBOIL pressure is somewhat higher than the LP column bottom pressure. Although that pressure increase could be accomplished by a liquid oxygen pump, a preferred method is to use the barometric or hydrostatic head of a column of liquid oxygen, i.e., boil the LOX at a suitably lower elevation than the LP column bottoms reboiler. This is disclosed in U.S. Patents 4133662, 4507134, 4560398, and South African application 845542 dated July 18, 1984 filed by Izumichi and Ohyama. SUBSTITUTESHEET It is known to depressurize the HP rectifier bottom liquid (kettle liquid) and then reflux the HP rectifier by exchanging latent heat between HP rectifier overhead vapor and the depres- surized kettle liquid. The evaporated kettle liquid is then fed to the LP column. This is disclosed in U.S. Patents 4410343, 4439220, and 4582518. It is known to apply the work developed by the refrigeration expander toward additional warm-end compression of part of the compressed air supply. The further compressed air may then be used for conventional refrigeration (German patent application 2854508 published 06/19/80 and filed by Rohde), or for TC LOXBOIL (U.S. Patent 4133662, USSR Patent 756150, and South African appli¬ cation 845542 (supra)). When adding intermediate reflux to a distillation column, the initial amount added allows a virtually one-for-one reduction in the overhead reflux (for specified recovery and purity). The benefit from intermediate reflux continues to increase as more is added until a "pinch" is reached: the operating line closely approaches the equilibrium line. Further additions of inter- mediate reflux beyond that point decrease the benefit, i.e., provide no more decrease in the amount of overhead reflux required. For an air separation process wherein liquid air is used as intermediate reflux, the optimal amount of liquid air reflux is about 5 to 10% of the feed air, for both the LP column and the HP rectifier. Greater liquid air flow rates do not provide any further decrease in the overhead reflux requirement. Thus in summary air partial expansion refrigeration as disclosed in " the prior art causes (1) an advantageous reduction in the LP column overhead reflux requirement; (2) no change in the HP rectifier overhead reflux requirement; (3) a disadvan¬ tageous decrease in the reboil through the HP rectifier and the lower section of the LP column; and (4) a disadvantageous increase in capital equipment. The combination of AIRPER refrigeration plus warm companding of the refrigeration air was disclosed by applicant in U.S. Patent 4670031. Fractional distillation refers to the process of separating a mixture of two or more volatile substances into at least two fractions of differing volatility and composition by countercurrent vapor-liquid contact whereby a series of evaporations and conden- sations occur. "Intermediate height" of a fractional distillation column signifies a location having countercurrent vapor-liquid contact stage(s) both above and below it. "Total condensation" signifies condensation of essentially all the vapor, such that for a multicomponeπt mixture the liquid composition is approximately the same as the vapor composition, e.g., within about 1 or 2% for the major component. This does not preclude withdrawing minor amounts of vapor, for example to remove trace gaseous impurities such as helium and hydrogen. Disclosure of Invention The. air partial expansion refrigeration (AIRPER) technique is improved by splitting the liquid air into two roughly equal portions (no greater than 3 to 1 ratio) and feeding one each to the HP rectifier and the LP column as respective intermediate refluxes. This reduces the HP rectifier overhead reflux requirement in addition to reducing the LP column overhead reflux requirement, and hence the total reduction is greater. This is important for flowsheets which are otherwise deficient in LN 2 reflux, such as processes requiring substantial amounts of HP GN 2 coproduct or high purity 0^ flowsheets with argon coproduct wherein it is also desired to PC LOXBOIL. Since the condensed air is at an intermediate pressure (between that of the HP rectifier and the LP column), it is necessary to first increase the pressure of the fraction to be routed to the HP rectifier. The AIRPER technique is also improved by maximizing the pressure ratio of the expansion, which minimizes the mass flow rate through the expander (and hence the amount of reboil by¬ passing the HP rectifier and lower section of the LP column). The most important measure to accomplish this is to condense the air at the coldest possible temperature which is possible from the perspective of supplying the needed intermediate reboil to the LP column (also referred to as the " 2 rejection or removal column"). In order to do that, the partially expanded air should preferably be condensed by latent heat exchange with either or both of two liquids: depressurized kettle liquid, and/or LP column liquid from approximately the same height as the feed height for the kettle liquid (which kettle liquid may be at least partially evaporated at that point, depending on the remainder of the flowsheet). Either of the above measures taken singly yields a substantial improvement to an air separation process incorporating AIRPER Q refrigeration. Most preferred are processes which incorporate- both measures, thereby achieving very substantial increases in distillation efficiency over conventional processes. The required mass flow rate through the refrigeration expander can be advantageously further reduced by warm companding which is also 5 preferred. However, this provides only minimal relative improvement over conventional flowsheets, because they can also incorporate warm companding of the expander supply. In summary, process and apparatus are disclosed for cryogenic separation of air to oxygen product plus optional crude argon coproduct 0 comprising: a) supplying an uncondensed fraction of the supply air to a high pressure (HP) rectifier; b) withdrawing overhead liquid from the HP rectifier and feeding at least part of it to a low pressure nitrogen 5 removal column as overhead reflux therefor; c) work expanding a minor fraction of the supply air to an intermediate pressure; d) condensing the expanded air by exchanging latent heat with at least one of N 2 removal column intermediate Q height liquid and at least part of the HP rectifier bottom liquid (kettle liquid); and e) splitting the resulting liquid air into at least two fractions and feeding one fraction to an intermediate reflux height of the HP rectifier and another to the ? 5 removal column. The above improved refrigeration technique finds advan¬ tageous application in any type of air fractional distillation process: oxygen or nitrogen primary product, gas and/or liquid primary product; and any 0 purity, including especially high purity 0 ? including crude argon coproduct. Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 is a simplified schematic flowsheet of a process 5 for producing low purity oxygen (up to about 97% purity) which incorporates PC LOXBOIL, PC reboil of the LP column, AIRPER with liquid air split (LAIRSPLIT), and in which the expanded air is used to evaporate LP column intermediate height liquid from the feed height. Figure 2 shows a similar flowsheet wherein the 10 expanded air partially evaporates the depressurized kettle liquid, and the two partial condensation exchangers are combined into one. Figure 3 illustrates the application of AIRPER to a dual pressure high purity 0 2 (99.5% purity) flowsheet having an argon sidearm, and shows that with improved AIRPER it becomes possible 15 to both increase argon recovery and increase 0 2 delivery pressure via PC LOXBOIL, all while retaining full 0 ? recovery. Figure 4 illustrates that the improved AIRPER technique is also applicable to triple pressure high purity 0 2 flowsheets. Figure 5 illustrate alternative means of applying AIRPER to dual pressure high purity 0, 2 '20 flowsheets from that of higure 3. In Figure 5 the increased overall process efficiency is realized as a substantial quantity of high purity N 2 coproduct, vice as increased 0 2 pressure. Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention Referring to Figure 1, compressed air that has preferably 25 been dried and cleaned while warm, e.g., with molecular sieves, is split into a minor fraction which is further compressed by compressor 101, and a major fraction which is cooled to near the dew point in main exchanger 102. The major fraction is then directed to partial condensation liquid oxygen evaporator 30103, and then on to the bottoms reboiler 104 of the LP N 2 rejection column 105. The partially condensed air is then optionally separated in phase separator 106, with at least the vapor fraction being fed to HP rectifier 107. HP rectifier overhead vapor provides intermediate reboil to LP column 105 at intermediate 35 reboiler 108; the resulting liquid N . is used to reflux both rectifier 107 and LP column 105, after subcooling in heat exchanger 109 and depressurization by valve 110. Optional phase separator 111 can be used to ensure only liquid is supplied to column 105. The bottoms or kettle liquid from rectifier 107, combined with liquid from separator 106, is also cooled, depressurized by valve 112 and fed to LP column 105. The refrigeration air from compressor 101 is partially cooled and then work expanded to an intermediate pressure in turbine 113, which powers compressor 101. If the air out of turbine 113 is still appreciably superheated, it may optionally be further cooled; otherwise it is routed directly to intermediate reboiler 114, where it is totally condensed while supplying intermediate reboil to LP column 105 at the feed tray height. The liquid air is split into two fractions, each comprising between 4 and 12% of the supply air. One fraction is depressurized by valve 115 and supplied to an intermediate reflux height of LP column 105; the other fraction is increased in pressure by pump 116 and supplied to an intermediate height of HP rectifier 107. The column 105 fraction can optionally be subcooled in heat exchanger 109, and the rectifier 107 fraction can optionally be heated in heat exchanger 117. The liquid oxygen bottom product from LP column 105 is transferred to evaporator 103 by pump 118 or other means for transport, depending on the relative elevations of reboiler 104 and evaporator 103. Gaseous oxygen and nitrogen are withdrawn via main exchanger 102. Other optional coproducts not shown include liquid oxygen from the sump of evaporatcr 103, liquid nitrogen, or high pressure gaseous nitrogen. Figure 2 illustrates a very similar flowsheet to that of Figure 1 with only two substantive changes: reboiler 204 of Figure 2 combines both the reboil and LOXBOIL duties wnich were performed respectively by reboilers 103 and 104 of Figure 1; and latent heat exchanger 214 condenses the partially expanded air against depressurized kettle liquid (which is thereby partially evaporated) rather than against LP column inter¬ mediate feed height liquid as in Figure 1. Less substantive changes are that exchanger 209 combines the duties of both heat exchangers 109 and 117 of Figure 1, and that exchanger 202 is illus¬ trated in 2 sections vice 1. Other 200 series components correspond to the description already given for the corresponding 100 series components, and will not be repeated. Figure 3 illustrates the application of improved AIRPER refrigeration to the conventional dual pressure column configura ¬ tion with argon sidear . Compressed, cleaned, and dried air is split, routing a minor fraction to warm compander 301, and the remainder to main exchanger 302. The cooled major fraction partially condenses in LOX evaporator 303, and the vapor fraction is routed to HP rectifier 307 after phase separation at separator 306. Overhead vapor from HP rectifier 307 reboils low pressure N„ rejection column 305 at reboiler 304, thereby yielding liquid N 2 which refluxes both rectifier 307 and column 305 via subcooler 309 and depressurization valve 310 plus optional phase separator 311. Argon sidearm column 319 communicates with column 305 at a height where essentially all N ? has been removed, and further concentrates the argon to about 95% purity for subsequent processing. The compressed minor air fraction from compressor 301 is cooled the minimum amount necessary to compensate main exchanger 302, then work expanded in expander 313 which powers compressor 301, and then (after optional further cooling) is condensed in latent heat exchanger 314 against evaporating kettle liquid which was depressurized by valve 312. Separator 321 feeds the vapor fraction to column 305, and the liquid fraction is routed via optional valve 322 to the reflux apparatus for sidearm 319. Reflux condenser 320 provides liquid reflux to sidearm 319 and further evaporates the kettle liquid before feeding to column 305. Preferably the reflux apparatus incorporates at least one stage of countercurrent vapor-liquid contact 324, e.g., a sieve tray, and a second vapor feed path to column 305 (one each from above and below the countercurrent contactor). The relative amounts of vapor flow through the two vapor paths can be controlled by valve 323. The objective of contactor 324 is to enable the vapor feed from below contactor 324 to have the maximum 0 content possible, thereby maximizing the reboil rate through sidearm 319 and increasing the argon recovery. Liquid oxygen of high purity in the sump of column 305 is increased in pressure by means for pressurization 318 (which is preferably merely a check valve in a hydrostatic head column) and evaporated to gaseous product oxygen at LOX evaporator 303, and then withdrawn. Conventional high purity 0 ? flowsheets with argon sidearm cannot advantageously use PC LOXBOIL, because the 0 recovery (and frequently ___. also argon recovery) is reduced excessively by the required partial condensation of about 25% of the supply air. Thus the LN 2 reflux otherwise available from that air is no longer available, and recovery suffers. With the disclosed improved AIRPER, the LN~ reflux requirements are greatly reduced such that PC LOXBOIL for the first time becomes advantageous. Also, by the sequential 2 or 3 step evaporation of the kettle liquid, whereby 2 or 3 vapor streams of differing composition are fed to the LP column, the column operates very efficiently and maximum reboil is possible through sidearm 319. Figure 4 illustrates high purity 0 2 production plus co- product argon in a triple pressure column arrangement, vice the dual pressure arrangement of Figure 3. The oxygen-argon separation is effected in a separate column operating at even lower pressure than the low pressure L removal column 305 of Figure 3. Since the N 2 rejection column 405 of Figure 4 is reboiled by partially condensing air in reboiler 404, it can operate with the same very low supply pressures in the range of 55 to 75 psia as Figures 1 and 2, as opposed to the 75 to 90 psia supply pressure range typical of Figure 3. Components 401, 402, 404-407, and 409-416 are similar in function to 100-, 200-, and 300-series components previously described. The argon column 419 includes both stripping and rectification sections, and also 2 reflux condensers—424 and 420. Depressurized kettle liquid from valve 412 is partially evaporated in condenser 424, and then separated by separator 421 and valve 423 to a liquid fraction having even higher 0„ content and a vapor fraction which is fed to column 405 at the same height as the intermediate liquid used to condense AIRPER air in intermediate reboiler 414. The liquid from valve 423 is evaporated in intermediate reflux condenser 420 and also routed to column 405, to a lower height (due to its higher 0 2 content). Column 419 is fed liquid oxygen-argon mixture from an intermediate height of column 405 via means for transport 425. Although column 419 is at a lower pressure than column 405, e.g., 16 psia as opposed to 21 psia, nevertheless means for trans- port 425 may be required to be a liquid pump due to the elevation difference. As much as possible of the gaseous oxygen product is withdrawn from the sump of column 405, at about 22 psia. Liquid oxygen bottom product from column 419 is transported to the column 405 sump via means for transport 418, which once again may be simply a control valve or check valve if the respective elevations are sufficiently different (hydrostatic head), but otherwise will be a liquid pump. In situations wherein not all the 0 2 product can be gasified at reboiler 404, e.g., when appreciable quantities of N coproduct are desired, some or all of the 0 ? product can be withdrawn at lower pressure from the sump of column 419. One beneficial measure which can be used to reduce or avoid the need to take some gaseous 0 ? product from column 419 is to incorporate an additional externally powered compressor 426 in the refrigeration air line, either before or after compressor 401, and optionally also a cooler 427. By further increasing the pressure ratio of expansion, the required mass flow rate through expander 413 is further reduced, making more air available to drive reboiler 404. The required compressor is very small, since it only compresses a small fraction (10 to 15%) of the supply air which is already at pressure, and its power demand is only on the order of 1 or 2% of the main air compressor power. It provides a good variable reserve for upset conditions or non- standard ambient conditions, thus reducing the reserve margin necessary in the remaining equipment. As such, it can be advantageous in all flowsheets incorporating AIRPER, not only the triple pressure one. Whereas Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the preferred methods of refluxing the argon rectification section involving sequential evaporation of kettle liquid, it will be recognized that other reflux techniques are possible, such as direct exchange of latent heat from argon rectifier vapor to N 2 rejection column intermediate height liquid. Although Figures 1 through 4 happen to all illustrate a partial condensation of the supply air before entering the HP rectifier, that is by no means a general requirement. Figure 5 illustrates a flowsheet.wherein the major fraction of supply air is directly supplied to the HP rectifier without inter¬ vening partial condensation. Referring to Figure 5, atmospheric air is compressed, cleaned and cooled, using typical components such as main air compressor 540, condenser-cooler 539, and molecular sieve dryer/C0 2 scrubber 538. A major fraction is then routed through main heat exchanger 502 to HP rectifier 507, while a minor fraction (about 10 to 20% of the supply air, and most preferably about 15%) is further compressed in warm compressor 501, cooled in exchangers 537 and 502, work-expanded In expander 513 (which powers compressor 501), and is then routed to AIRPER latent heat exchanger 514, where it is essen¬ tially totally condensed. The resulting liquid air is split into two streams: one being raised to HP rectifier 507 pressure by pump 516 and supplied to an intermediate reflux height of HP rectifier 507; and the other reduced to the approximate pressure of LP column 505 and fed to an intermediate reflux height of that column by means for pressure reduction 515. HP rectifier 507 is refluxed at the top by latent heat exchanger 504, which also reboils LP column 505 and evaporates the product 0„. The air and liquid air supplied to HP rectifier 507 are thereby rectified to N ? overhead product and impure 0„ bottom product (kettle liquid). Part of the overhead N_ product, of about 99% purity, is routed as liquid through cooler 509, means for pressure reduction 510, and optional phase separator 511, and thence into the overhead of LP column 505 as reflux liquid. The coproduct NL is typically desired at higher purity, and hence can be further purified in HP rectifier 507 by an additional zone of counter-current vapor-liquid contact 536. Liquid N_ of much higher purity (99.99% or higher) is withdrawn from above that zone and then is partially reduced in pressure at means for depressurization 535, and is evaporated in latent heat exchanger 534. Exchanger 534 is heated by condensing vapor from argon sidearm 519. Although overhead vapor is possible, It is preferred that intermediate vapor from sidearm 519 be used, and intermediate reflux returned to sidearm 519. The argon recovery from sidearm 519 is Increased regardless of whether exchanger 534 is used to condense overhead or intermediate vapor, but when intermediate vapor is used, a higher N 2 coproduct pressure is obtained (about 50 psia). With this "liquid nitrogen boil" (LINBOIL) technique, about 20% of the supply air flowrate can be obtained as high purity N 2 coproduct at 50 psia, while retaining full recovery of high purity 0 2 and also high recovery of crude argon. The remainder of Figure 5 illustrates a "sequential KELBOIL" technique for supplying cooling to both AIRPER exchanger 514 and argon sidearm reflux condenser 520, while at the same time dividing the kettle liquid into three streams of differing composition for optimized feeding to different heights of LP column 505. After cooling in cooler 509, one fraction of the kettle liquid is fed directly to LP column 505 via valve 531; and the remainder is supplied to exchanger 514 via valve 512. The partially evaporated kettle liquid from exchanger 514 is further divided into two streams, with at least most of the vapor fed to LP column 505 via valve 532 and at least most of the liquid fed to exchanger 520 via valve 522. The latter stream after further evaporation is finally supplied to LP column 505 via conduit 533. It will be recognized, however, that other means of cooling exchangers 514 and 520 are also possible, for example either or both could exchange latent heat directly with LP column 505 liquid. Also, Figure 3 could utilize the same sequential KELBOIL technique illustrated in Figure 5. In summary, the AIRPER technique minimizes the combined requirement of column 505 and rectifier 507 for LN- reflux, thus freeing-up LN ? for coproduct; and the LINBOIL technique permits the N 2 coproduct to be obtained at a substantial pressure level. Clearly other useful embodiments are possible from the combination of AIRPER and LINBOIL: for example the pressurized could be expanded to produce more refrigeration, hence greatly increasing the liquids coproduct; or the expanding N could be used to drive a cold compressor to increase 0 2 pressure, 0 2 purity, and/or argon recovery. Industrial Applicability The disclosed improvementsare applicable to industrial cryogenic air separation processes of any type, especially those for 0 9 production in the approximate capacity range of 50 to 5,000 tons per day, and at any purity.

Claims: Claims 1. Process for cryogenic distillation of compressed air to oxygen product plus optional crude argon byproduct comprising: a) supplying at least an uncondensed portion of a major fraction of the supply air to a high pressure rectifier; b) withdrawing overhead liquid from the HP rectifier and feeding at least part of it to a low pressure nitrogen removal column as overhead reflux therefor; c) work expanding a minor fraction of the supply air to an intermediate pressure; d) condensing the expanded air by exchanging latent heat with at least one of N removal column intermediate height liquid and at least part of the HP rectifier bottom liquid (kettle liquid); and e) splitting the resulting liquid air into at least two fractions and feeding one fraction to an intermediate reflux height of the HP rectifier and another to the N * removal column. 2. Process according to claim 1 further comprising directly supplying a major fraction of the supply air to the HP recti¬ fier without preliminary partial condensation, and further comprising: a) increasing the pressure of one of said fractions of liquid air before intermediate refluxing the HP rectifier with it; b) additionally compressing the minor fraction of air to be work-expanded prior to said work expansion; and c) powering said compression step with the work produced in said expansion step. 3. Process according to claim 1 further comprising: a) partially condensing part of said compressed air prior to said supplying of the uncondensed fraction to the HP rectifier; .! 5 b) increasing the pressure of one of said fractions of liquid air before said feeding of it to the HP rectifier; c) evaporating liquid oxygen bottom product from said N 2 rejection column by exchanging latent heat with said partially condensing air; and d) providing at least one of N 2 rejection column bottoms reboil and gaseous oxygen product from said evaporating liquid oxygen. 4. Process according to claim 1 further comprising: a) depressurizing kettle liquid to the approximate pressure of said N 2 rejection column; b) supplying said depressurized kettle liquid to said air condensing step; c) partially evaporating said kettle liquid by exchanging latent heat with condensing air; d) feeding at least the vapor fraction of the partially evaporated kettle liquid to the N ? removal column; e) condensing partially work-expanded air by said latent heat exchanging step in an amount which is between about 10 and 24 percent of the compressed air supply; and f) supplying separate liquid air intermediate reflux streams to the HP rectifier and N ? rejection column which are each between about 5 and 12 ' percent of the compressed air supply. 5. Process according to claim ' 3 further comprising: a) additionally compressing the minor fraction of air to be work expanded prior to said work expansion; b) powering said compression with the work produced by said expansion; and c) exchanging latent heat between HP rectifier overhead vapor and N ? rejection column intermediate height liquid, thereby providing overhead reflux to the HP rectifier and inter¬ mediate reboil to the N ? rejection column. 6. Process according to claim 3 further comprising: a) providing an argon distillation column which is fed a liquid oxygen-argon mixture from the N„ rejection column; and b) reboiling the argon column by exchanging latent heat with 5 HP rectifier overhead vapor. 7. Process according to claim 6 further comprising: a) additionally compressing the minor fraction of air to be work-expanded prior to said work expansion; b) powering said compression with the work produced by said 10 expansion; c) refluxing the argon column overhead by exchanging latent heat with partially evaporating depressurized kettle liquid; d) refluxing an intermediate height of the argon column by 15 exchanging latent heat with the remaining unevaporated kettle liquid; and e) feeding the vapor streams from steps c) and d) to different heights of the N 2 rejection column. 8. Process according to claim 6 further comprising 20 a) additionally compressing the minor fraction of air to be work-expanded prior to said work expansion; b) powering said compression with an external source of power; c) selecting the rejection column feed location as the 25 height from which intermediate height liquid is obtained for latent heat exchange with expanded air; and d) evaporating at least a major fraction of the gaseous oxygen product by said step of exchanging latent heat with partially condensing air. 30. 9. Process according to claim 3 further comprising: a) reboiling the bottom of the N ? rejection column by exchanging latent heat with HP rectifier overhead vapor; b) providing an argon sidearm column in vapor and liquid communication with the N ? rejection column; c) withdrawing crude argon sidearm; and d) increasing the pressure of the liquid oxygen bottom product from the NL rejection column prior to evaporating it by latent heat exchange with partially condensing supply air. 10. Process according to claim 9 further comprising: a) locating the liquid oxygen evaporator at a lower elevation than the bottom of the N 2 rejection column whereby at least part of the said pressure increase is obtained by the hydrostatic head of the liquid oxygen; b) at least partially evaporating depressurized kettle liquid in at least two sequential stages by exchanging latent heat with argon sidearm column vapor, thereby providing argon sidearm column reflux and at least two vapor streams of differing composition; and c) feeding said two vapor streams to different heights of said N 2 rejection column. 11. Process according to claim 1 further comprising reboiling 2 rejection column intermediate height liquid from the same equilibrium stage as the optionally evaporated kettle liquid feed height by said latent heat exchange with expanded air. 12. Process according to claim 1 further comprising: a) additionally compressing the minor fraction of supply air to be work expanded at least once prior to said work expansion; b) cooling said minor fraction after compressing but before expanding; and c) powering one of said additional compressions from work developed by said expansion and another by an external power source. 13. Process according to claim 1 additionally comprised of: a) rectifying an argon-oxygen mixture obtained from near the bottom of said LP column to a crude argon overhead product in an argon rectifier; and b) providing at least part of the reflux to said argon rectifier by latent heat exchange with part of the LN_ overhead product from said HP rectifier after said LN has been partially depressurized. 14. Process according to claim 13 wherein said reflux for said argon rectifier is provided at an intermediate height, and further comprising refluxing said argon rectifier at the overhead. 15. A process for producing at least one of oxygen, nitrogen, and coproduct crude argon from compressed air by fractional dis- tillation comprising: a) rectifying an uncondensed major fraction of the compressed air to liquid nitrogen overhead product and oxygen enriched liquid bottom product (kettle liquid) ; b) work expanding a minor fraction of the compressed air to an intermediate pressure; c) condensing the expanded air by exchanging latent heat with depressurized kettle liquid, thereby partly evaporating said kettle liquid; and d) distilling the at least partly evaporated kettle liquid to gaseous overhead NL and fluid 0 ? bottom product in a low pressure distillation column (LP column). 16. Process according to claim 15 further comprising: a) additionally compressing said minor fraction of air prior to said expansion; and b) powering said additional compression by the work obtained from said expansion. 17. Process according to claim 16 further comprising: a) splitting said condensed air into two approximately equal fractions; b) supplying one fraction to an intermediate height of the low pressure column; and c) increasing the pressure of the remaining fraction and supplying it to an intermediate height of the high pressure rectifier. 18. Process according to claim 17 further comprising: a) partially condensing said compressed air prior to said supplying of the uncondensed fraction to the HP rectifier; and b) evaporating liquid oxygen bottom product from said LP col¬ umn by exchanging latent heat with said partially condensing compressed air; and c) providing at least one of LP column bottoms reboil and gaseous oxygen product from said evaporating liquid oxygen. 19. Process according to claim 18 further comprising: a) compressing said minor fraction of air to be expanded a second time prior to said expansion by an externally powered compressor; and b) cooling said minor fraction after both compressions and before said expansion. 20. Apparatus for cryogenic fractional distillation of compressed air comprising: a) a high pressure column which is supplied an uncondensed major fraction of said compressed air; b) a low pressure column which is refluxed with liquid NL from the overhead product of said HP rectifier; c) a work expander which is supplied a minor fraction of said compressed air after partial cooling; d) at least one latent heat exchanger which is supplied said expanded air and one of depressurized kettle liquid and LP column feed height liquid; e) means for splitting the condensed air from said latent heat exchanger into two fractions; f) means for supplying one of said liquid fractions to an intermediate height of the LP column; and g) means for pressurizing the remaining fraction and supplying it to an intermediate height of said HP column. 21. Apparatus according to claim 20 wherein said means for pres- surization is a liquid pump and further comprising: a) latent heat exchanger for evaporating liquid oxygen bottom product from said LP column via partial condensation of said major air fraction; and b) means for compressing said minor fraction of air prior to said expansion, said means for compressing being powered by said work expander. 22. Apparatus according to claim 20 additionally comprised of: a) an argon-oxygen rectifier which is supplied oxygen-argon mixture from near the bottom of said LP column; and b) a reflux condenser for said argon-oxygen rectifier which is supplied partially depressurized LNL overhead product from said HP rectifier. 23. Apparatus according to claim 22 wherein said LN ? reflux condenser supplies intermediate height reflux to said argon rectifier, and additionally comprised of an overhead reflux condenser for said argon-oxygen rectifier which is supplied at least one of a liquid fraction obtained from depressurized kettle liquid and LP column intermediate height liquid.

Inventors: ERICKSON DONALD C, ERICKSON, DONALD, C.
Applicants: ERICKSON DONALD C, ERICKSON, DONALD, C.
Application year: 1987
Main classification: F25J3
IPC codes: F25J3