A PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ALKANOL AKOXYLATE PRODUCT

Abstract: Alkylene oxide adducts of higher alkanols are prepared by a process which comprises contacting and reacting an alkylene oxide reactant comprising one or more C₂ to C₄ vicinal alkylene oxides with an alkanol reactant comprising one or more C₆ to C₃₀ alkanols in the presence of a catalytically effective amount of a catalyst which combines (i) one or more phosphorus-containing acids with (ii) one or more aluminum compounds selected from the group consisting of aluminum alcoholates and aluminum phenolates, the relative molar ratio of component (i) to component (ii) being in the range from 0.1:1 to 2.5:1. Alkanol alkoxylates, and particularly alkanol ethoxylates, prepared in this manner are characterized by a relatively narrow-range distribution of alkylene oxide adducts and by a relatively low content of residual alkanol. The products of this process are nonionic surfactants, particularly useful as components of detergent formulations.

Description: This invention relates to a process for the preparation of alkanol alkoxylates as the reaction products of alkylene oxides with alkanols. A large variety of products useful, for instance, as nonionic surfactants, wetting and emulsifying agents, solvents, and chemical intermediates, are prepared by the addition reaction (alkoxylation reaction) of alkylene oxides with organic compounds having one or more active hydrogen atoms. As an example, particular mention may be made of the alkanol ethoxylates and alkyl-substituted phenol ethoxylates prepared by the reaction of ethylene oxide with aliphatic alcohols or substituted phenols of about 6 to 30 carbon atoms. Such ethoxylates, and to a lesser extent corresponding propoxylates and compounds containing mixed oxyethylene and oxypropylene groups, are most commonly applied as nonionic detergent components of commercial cleaning formulations for use in industry and in the home. An illustration of the preparation of an alkanol ethoxylate (represented by formula III below) by addition of a number (n) of ethylene oxide molecules (formula II) to a single alkanol molecule (formula I) is presented by the equation The addition of alkylene oxides to alkanols and other active- hydrogen containing compounds is known to be desirably promoted by a catalyst, most conventionally a catalyst of either strongly acidic or strongly basic character. Recognized in the art as suitable basic catalysts are the basic salts of the alkali metals of Group I of the Periodic Table, e.g., sodium, potassium, rubidium, and cesium, and the basic salts of certain of the alkaline earth metals of Group II of the Periodic Table, e.g., calcium, strontium, barium and in some cases magnesium. Conventional acidic alkoxylation catalysts include, broadly, the Lewis acid or Friedel-Crafts catalysts. Specific examples of these catalysts are the fluorides, chlorides, and bromides of boron, antimony, tungsten, iron, nickel, zinc, tin, aluminum, titanium and molybdenum. The use of complexes of such halides with, for example, alcohols, ethers, carboxylic acids, and amines has also been reported. Still other examples of known acidic alkoxylation catalyts are sulfuric and phosphoric acids; perchloric acid and the perchlorates of magnesium, calcium, manganese, nickel and zinc; metal oxalates, sulfates, phosphates, carboxylates and acetates; alkali metal fluoroborates, zinc titanate; and metal salts of benzene sulfonic acid. In one important aspect, the present invention relates to an alkoxylation reaction catalyzed by a particular combination of one or more of certain aluminum compounds with a phosphorus-containing acid such as phosphoric acid, the oxides of phosphorus, organic phosphonic acids, organic phosphinic acids, etc. In another important aspect, the invention further involves the discovery of a process for the production of alkylene oxide adducts of alkanols (termed alkanol alkoxylates or simply alkoxylates for purposes of describing this invention) which are characterized by a narrow or peaked alkylene oxide adduct distribution. Alkylene oxide addition reactions are known to produce a product mixture of various alkoxylate molecules having different numbers of alkylene oxide adducts (oxyalkylene adducts), e.g., having different values for the adduct number n in formula III above. The adduct number is a factor which in many respects controls the properties of the alkoxylate molecule, and efforts are made to tailor the average adduct number of a product and/or the distribution of adduct numbers within a product to the product's intended service. The present invention provides a process characterized by enhanced selectivity for the preparation of alkoxylate mixtures in which a relatively large proportion of the alkoxylate molecules have a number (n) of alkylene oxide adducts that is within a relatively narrow range of values. It has been reported that alkoxylate products having such a narrow range distribution are preferred for use in certain detergent formulations (Great Britain Patent No. 1,462,134; Derwent Publications Research Disclosure number 194,010). Narrow-range alkoxylates are also known to be particularly valuable as chemical intermediates in the synthesis of certain carboxyalkylated alkyl polyethers (U.S. Patent No. 4,098,818) and of certain alkyl ether sulfates (Great Britain Patent No. 1,553,561). Conventional commercial alkoxylate preparation, which has in large part been limited to the use of basic catalysts, particularly the metals sodium and potassium and their oxides and hydroxides, yields only a relatively broad distribution range product. Conventional acid-catalyzed alkoxylation reactions have long been known to produce a more narrow range product than that obtained with the alkali metal catalysts. Characteristic of the product of the typical acid-catalyzed alkoxylation is a statistical Poisson distribution in which the relative concentration of each individual alkoxylate species may be expressed in terms of the following equation, which is well known to those in the oligomerization and polymerization arts: wherein N represents the overall molar ratio of reactant alkylene oxide to reactant alkanol, n represents alkylene oxide adduct number, P(n) represents the mole fraction of alkoxylate product molecules having the adduct number n, and e indicates the natural logarithm function. In effect, this expression reflects a reaction mechanism under which all hydroxyl-containing species in the alkoxylation reaction mixture (i.e., both alkanol reactant and alkoxylate intermediates) react with the alkylene oxide at the same rate. Although acid catalysis provides a relatively narrow distribution product, it is known to have substantial disadvantage in several other respects. For instance, the acids are often unstable with limited life and effectiveness as catalysts in the alkoxylation mixture. Both the acid catalysts themselves and their decomposition products catalyze side reactions producing relatively large amounts of polyalkylene glycols, and also react directly with the components of the alkoxylation mixture to yield undesirable, and often unacceptable, by-products such as organic derivatives of the acids. Overall, use of acid alkoxylation catalysts is known to result in relatively poor quality products. Also of substantial importance in the alkoxylation of the higher (C₆ to C₃₀) alkanols is the ability of the process to minimize the quantity of unreacted (or residual) alkanol reactant remaining in the product. A high level of residual alkanol either represents a loss of valuable reactant, or requires that further processing of the product be carried out to recover the alcohol. Moreover, the presence of unreacted alkanol is recognized to be of disadvantage from the standpoint of product quality and environmental concerns. For instance, residual alkanol in the product contributes to volatile organic emissions during spray drying of detergent formulations. There has now been found a process for the preparation of an alkanol alkoxylate product characterized by a narrow-range alkylene oxide adduct distribution and by a low content of residual alkanol, which comprises contacting and reacting an alkylene oxide reactant comprising one or more C₂ to C₄ vicinal alkylene oxides with an alkanol reactant comprising one or more C₆ to C₃₀ alkanols in the presence of a catalytically effective amount of a catalyst prepared by contacting (i) one or more phosphorus-containing acids and (ii) one or more aluminium compounds selected from the group consisting of aluminum alcoholates and aluminum phenolates, the molar ratio of (i) to (ii) being in the range from 0.1:1 to 2.5:1. The phosphorus-containing acid which is used as an alkoxylation process catalyst component or precursor for purposes of the invention is preferably one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of phosphoric acid, the oxides of phosphorus, alkyl and aryl phosphonic acids, alkyl and aryl phosphinic acids, superphosphoric acid, and alkali metal and alkaline earth metal dihydrogen phosphates and dihydrogen diphosphates. The aluminum alcoholate and/or phenolate compounds can be applied per se, i.e., added directly to the process mixture, or, alternatively, can be formed in situ in the alcohol- containing process mixture by introduction of suitable precursors capable of conversion to aluminum alcoholate and/or phenolate compound(s), which in turn function as a catalyst component or as a precursor to the desired catalyst. In comparison to conventional alkoxylation reactions carried out in the presence of conventional acidic catalysts alone, the process of the invention yields (1) a higher quality product relatively free of by- products, (2) a product having a narrower distribution of alkylene oxide adducts, and (3) a product having a reduced level of residual alkanol. The present invention centers upon discoveries associated with the use in an alkoxylation process of a certain class of catalysts. Apart from the use of such catalysts, the process of the invention is, as a general rule, suitably conducted using such reactants and practicing under such processing procedures and reaction conditions as are known to the art for alkanol alkoxylation reactions. Certain preferences may, however, be expressed for particular reactants, procedures and conditions. Thus, the invention is preferably applied to processes utilizing an alkylene oxide (epoxide) reactant which comprises one or more C₂ to C₄ vicinal alkylene oxides. Reactants which comprise ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, or mixtures of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide are preferred, while reactants wherein the alkylene oxide content consists essentially of ethylene oxide are considered particularly preferred. The alkanol reactant very suitably comprises one or more alkanols having carbon number in the range from about 6 to 30. An alkanol reactant consisting essentially of primary, mono-hydric alkanols is considered most preferred, although secondary and tertiary alcohols as well as polyhydric alkanols are also very suitably utilized in the process of the invention either alone or in mixtures with the primary mono-hydric alkanols. Most preferably, the alkanol reactant consists essentially of one or more C₆ to C₃₀ primary mono-hydric alkanols. Preference can also be expressed for alkanols having from 8 to about 20 carbon atoms, with C₉ to C₁₈ alkanols considered more preferred and C₁₁ to C₁₆ alcohols considered most preferred. As a general rule, the carbon chains of the alkanols may be of either branched or linear (straight chain) structure, although preference further exists for alkanol reactants in which greater than about 50 percent, more preferably greater than about 70 percent and most preferably greater than about 90 percent of the molecules are of linear (straight-chain) carbon structure. In large part, such preferences relate more to the utility and value of the product alkoxylates in commercial services than to the operability or performance of the process of the invention. The general suitability of such alkanols as reactants in alkoxylation reactions is well recognized in the art. Examples of specific alkanols and of commercially available alkanols and alkanol mixtures within this class are also well known. Commercially available mixtures of primary mono-hydric alkanols prepared via the oligomerization of ethylene and the hydroformylation or oxidation and hydrolysis of the resulting higher olefins are particularly preferred. Examples of such commercially available alkanol mixtures include the NEODOL Alcohols, trademark of and sold by Shell Chemical Company, including mixtures of C₉, C₁₀ and C₁₁ alkanols (NEODOL 91), mixtures of C₁₂ and C₁₃ alkanols (NEODOL 23), mixtures of C₁₂, C₁₃, C₁₄, and C₁₅ alkanols (NEODOL 25), and mixtures of C₁₄ and C₁₅ alkanols (NEODOL 45); the ALFOL Alcohols, trademark of and sold by Continental Oil Co., including mixtures of C₁₀ and C₁₂ alkanols (ALFOL 1012), mixtures of C₁₂ and C₁₄ alkanols (ALFOL 1214), mixtures of C₁₆ and C₁₈ alkanols (ALFOL 1618), and mixtures of C₁₆, C₁₈ and C₂₀ alkanols (ALFOL 1620); the EPAL Alcohols, trademark of and sold by Ethyl Chemical Company, including mixtures of C₁₀ and C₁₂ alkanols (EPAL 1012), mixtures of C₁₂ and C₁₄ alkanols (EPAL 1214), and mixtures of C₁₄, C₁₆, and C₁₈ alkanols (EPAL 1418); and the TERGITOL-L Alcohols, trademark of and sold by Union Carbide Corporation, including mixtures of C₁₂, C₁₃, C₁₄, and C₁₅ alkanols (TERGITOL-L 125). Also very suitable are the commercially available alkanols prepared by the reduction of naturally occurring fatty esters, for example, the CO and TA products of Procter and Gamble Company and the TA alcohols of Ashland Oil Company. For purposes of the invention, the alkylene oxide reactant and the active hydrogen reactant are necessarily contacted in the presence of the specified two-component catalyst. As one component of this catalyst, the process of the invention makes use of one or more phosphorus-containing acids. The use of this phosphorus-containing acid terminology in describing the invention is particularly intended to designate the oxo acids of phosphorus. The choice of a particular acid component is not critical and a wide variety of oxo acids can be used. The phosphoric and phosphorus acids are very suitable for use in the invention. The hypo-, meta-, ortho-, and pyro- forms of both phosphoric and phosphorus acids are useful, as are related derivatives such as monofluoro- and difluorophosphoric acids. Also very suitable are the oxides of phosphorus, including the trioxide, tetraoxide, and pentaoxide. The acids may be partially neutralized and contain, for instance, alkali metal or alkaline earth metal cations. Examples of partially neutralized acids include the alkali metal and alkaline earth metal dihydrogen phosphates and dihydrogen diphosphates. Specific examples are sodium dihydrogen phosphate, disodium hydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, and calcium hydrogen phosphate. Also suitable are the alkyl, aryl, alkylaryl, and arylalkyl dihydrogen phosphates, otherwise known as the esters of phosphoric acid, such as methyl dihydrogen phosphate, benzene dihydrogen phosphate, and ethyl dihydrogen phosphate. Suitable phosphorus-containing acids are also exemplified by the alkyl, aryl, alkylaryl or arylalkyl phosphinic and phosphonic acids. Specific examples include benzene phosphinic acid, benzene phosphonic acid, ethyl phosphinic acid, ethyl phosphonic acid, methyl phosphinic acid, and methyl phosphonic acid. Still other examples of suitable phosphorus-containing acids are phosphomolybdic acid and phosphotungstic acid. A particularly useful class of ortho-phosphoric acid and ortho phosphoric-acid derivatives may be represented by the formula wherein Z¹ and Z² each individually represents a univalent inorganic atom or organic radical. Preferably, each of Z¹ and Z² are independently selected from the group consisting of OH, OM, R and OR groups, with H representing hydrogen, M an alkali metal and R an alkyl, aryl, arylalkyl, or alkylaryl group. For example, Z¹ and Z² suitably each represent OH (in which case the formula identifies phosphoric acid), Z¹ may represents an OM group with M representing an alkali metal and Z² may represent OH (in which case the formula identifies an alkali metal dihydrogen phosphate), Z¹ may represent R (with R representing an alkyl, aryl, arylalkyl or alkylaryl group) and Z² may represent OH (in which case the formula represents the corresponding phosphonic acid), Z¹ and Z² may each represent an R group (in which case the formula identifies the corresponding phosphinic acid), Z¹ may represent OR and Z² may represent OH (in which case the formula identifies the corresponding alkyl, aryl, arylalkyl or alkylaryl dihydrogen phosphate), Similarly, a suitable class of hypo-phosphoric acid and its derivatives may be represented by the formula and a class of pyro-phosphoric acid and its derivatives may be represented by the formula wherein Z¹, Z², Z³, and Z⁴ each individually represents a univalent inorganic atom or organic radical. Preferably, each of Z¹, Z², Z³, and Z⁴ is independently selected from the group consisting of OH, OM, R and OR groups, as hereinabove defined. When an organic phosphorus containing acid is employed in the invention, it is preferred that the compound contain between 1 and about 30 carbon atoms. Organic acids containing from 1 to about 20 carbon atoms are more preferred, and those containing between about 1 and 7 carbon atoms are considered most preferred. As is also the case for the aluminum containing component of the catalyst, the phosphorus-containing acid catalyst component is suitably introduced directly into the process mixture or formed therein upon addition to the mixture of precursors of the phosphorus-containing acid(s). For example, reaction between an inorganic or organic phosphate salt (e.g., sodium phosphate or triethyl phosphate) and a strong acid (e.g., hydrochloric acid) in situ in the process mixture produces a suitable phosphorus-containing acid catalyst. In the presence of the alkanol reactant, the phosphorus oxides act as precursors for the formation of mono-esters of phosphoric acid and are thus considered phosphorus-containing acids for purposes of this invention. Mixtures of phosphorus-containing acids are very suitable. A particularly preferred group of phosphorus-containing acids is that which consists of the ortho-, hypo-, and pyro- forms of both phosphoric and phosphorous acid, the metal and alkyl, aryl, arylalkyl, and alkylaryl dihydrogen phosphates, and the alkyl, aryl, arylalkyl, and alkylaryl phosphinic and phosphonic acids. A catalyst component selected from the group consisting of ortho-, hypo-, and pyro- phosphoric acids, ortho-, hypo-, and pyro- phosphorous acids, and alkyl, aryl, alkylaryl, and arylalkyl dihydrogen phosphates is considered more preferred. The phosphoric acids, particularly orthophosphoric acid, and the phosphorous acids, particularly orthophosphoric acid, are considered most preferred for use in the invention from the standpoint of overall process performance and economics. The second necessary component of the catalyst of the process of the invention suitably comprises one or more aluminum alcoholate or phenolate compounds. Preferably, this component comprises one or more alkoxide or phenoxide compounds of the formula At least one of X¹, X², and X³ represents an -OR moiety, wherein the R substituent is selected from the group consisting of alkyl and (optionally alkyl-substituted) phenyl moieties, preferably C₁ to C₃₀ alkyl and optionally substituted phenyl moieties. The X¹, X², and X³ substituents which represent -OR groups suitably represent the same or different -OR groups. It is intended that the invention encompass embodiments utilizing aluminum compounds in which at least one of X¹, X² and X³ represents a precursor moiety which undergoes conversion to an -OR moiety in the process mixture, and particularly in the presence of the alkanol reactant. Examples of such moieties which serve as precursors include halogen moieties, particularly chlorine and bromine atoms, carboxy (for instance acetate) groups, and alkyl (for instance methyl) groups. The one or more of X¹, X², and X³ which are not either -OR groups or precursors for the formation of -OR groups suitably represent organic or inorganic moieities which are substantially inert in the process medium. Most preferably, X¹ and X² and X³ all represent (or are in practice converted to) the same or different -OR groups. Specific examples of preferred alkoxide compounds suitable as catalyst components for purposes of the invention include the aluminum alkoxides (wherein R is C₁ to C₃₀ alkyl), including the lower alkoxides, e.g., aluminum ethoxide, aluminum isopropoxide, and aluminum t-butoxide, as well as the higher alkoxides having one or more of their alkyl R substituents in the same C₈ to C₂₀ range as the alkanol reactant of the process, e.g., nonyl, decyl, dodecyl, and hexadecyl groups. Specific examples of preferred phenoxide compounds useful in this service include aluminum phenoxide, lower alkyl-substituted phenol derivatives such as aluminum benzyloxide and and higher alkyl-substituted phenol derivatives, e.g., compounds wherein R represents nonylphenyl, tridecylphenyl, pentadecylphenyl, etc. Specific examples of preferred compounds which serve as precursors for the formation in situ of aluminum alkoxide compounds include aluminum triacetate and trialkylaluminum compounds such as trimethylaluminum and triethylaluminum. Particular preference exists for the use of an alkoxide in which each of the X¹, X², and X³ substituents is an -OR group wherein R is an alkyl group having a carbon number in the range from 1 to about 30, more preferably a carbon number in the range from about 1 to 20, and most preferably a carbon number which corresponds to the carbon number(s) of the particular alkanol reactant employed in the given process application. Thus, for instance, the reaction of a dodecyl alcohol reactant is most preferably conducted in the presence of a catalyst which comprises a catalyst in which a substantial portion of the second catalyst component is a compound of the formula Al-(OR)₃, wherein each R is a dodecyl group. Without intention that the invention be limited to one theory or mechanism of operation, it is thought that the alcoholate and phenolate compounds commonly undergo transalcoholysis reactions in the presence of the alkanol reactant and are converted, at least in part, to alkoxides having alkyl substituents of carbon numbers which correspond to those of the alkanol reactant. Thus, for example, when an aluminum isopropoxide catalyst component is contacted with a higher alkanol alkoxylation reactant (e.g., a C₁₂ to C₁₅ alkanol mixture) a transalcoholysis reaction results which liberates isopropanol and converts at least a portion of the aluminum isopropoxide to aluminum alkoxides having C₁₁ to C₁₅ alkyl substituents. In one preferred embodiment of the invention, a lower carbon number aluminum alkoxide (e.g., an alkoxide characterized by alkyl group carbon number(s) of less than about 6) is mixed with the alkanol reactant, prior to contact with the alkylene oxide reactant, under conditions which favor the conversion by transalcoholysis of the lower alkoxide compounds to alkoxide compounds which correspond in carbon number (or carbon number distribution) of the alkoxide substituent to the carbon number (or carbon number distribution) of the alkanol reactant. In the practice of the process of the invention, the catalyst components are applied in a molar ratio of the first phosphorus-containing acid component to the second aluminum containing component that is in the range from about 0.1:1 to 2.5:1. Higher relative ratios result in lower reaction rates and higher degrees of by-product formation, while at lower ratios the reaction rate is undesirably low. Molar ratios of the first catalyst component to its second component in the range from about 0.1:1 to about 2.0:1 are preferred, while molar ratios between about 0.3:1 to 1:1 are considered more preferred and molar ratios between about 0.4:1 and 0.6:1 are most preferred. The catalyst combination is present in the reaction mixture in a catalytically effective amount. For the typical practical operation, a quantity of catalyst is desirably at least about 0.01%w (percent by weight) of the combined total of the two components relative to the alkanol reactant. Although catalyst quantity is not narrowly critical, preference may be expressed for use of the catalyst in amount of at least about 0.05%w, while an amount between about 0.1 and 2%w is considered most preferred. Substantially greater quantities of catalyst, e.g., up to about 10%w, are also very suitable. As a rule, the higher the deisired average alkylene oxide adduct number of the alkoxylate product, the greater the required quantity of catalyst. In terms of processing procedures, the alkoxylation reaction in the invention may be conducted in a generally conventional manner. For example, the catalyst components may initially be mixed with the alkanol reactant. A substantially liquid mixture forms, although it is not necessary that all of the added catalyst dissolve in the alkanol. This mixture is then contacted, preferably under agitation, with alkylene oxide reactant, which is typically introduced in gaseous form. The order in which the catalyst components and the reactants are contacted has not been found to be critically important to the invention. Thus, for instance, it is suitable practice to premix the aluminum compound catalyst component with the phosphorus-containing component, prior to their introduction into contact with the alkanol reactant. The observation of a reaction between the two catalyst components when they are pre-mixed in the absence of alcohol and ethylene oxide suggests that the two specified components may in fact serve as precursors of a single effective catalyst which has not been otherwise identified. Accordingly, the catalyst is described with reference to a combination of, or, equivalently, to a catalyst prepared by contacting the two specified components. Also very suitable, and generally preferred from the standpoint of convenience, is a combination of the two components by contact in the presence of the alkanol reactant, e.g., by independent, addition of the two components to the reactant. It is considered surprising that such mixing or premixing of the two components results in an active catalyst for the alkoxylation reaction, in view of observations that an aluminum phosphate salt is not considered suitable as a catalyst for the desired reaction. Although the aluminum phosphate salt catalyzes the alkoxylation reaction, it also catalyzes the polymerization reaction of the alkylene oxide to yield a product having an unacceptably high level of polyalkylene glycol by-product. Overall, the two reactants are utilized in quantities which are predetermined to yield an alkoxylate product of the desired mean or average adduct number, e.g., typically from less than one to about 30. In general terms, suitable and preferred process temperatures and pressures for purposes of this invention are the same as in conventional alkoxylation reactions, between the same reactants, employing conventional catalysts. A temperature of at least about 70°C, particularly at least about 100°C, is typically preferred for a significant rate of reaction, while a temperature less than about 200°C, particularly less than about 180°C, and most particularly less than about 170°C, is typically desirable to minimize degradation of the product. The two- component catalyst used in the invention is highly active, and care must be taken to control the temperature of the exothermic reaction. Superatmospheric pressures, e.g., pressures between about 1,7 bar and 11,5 bar are preferred. While these procedures describe a batch mode of operation, the invention is equally applicable to a continuous process. The alkanol reactant is generally a liquid and the alkylene oxide reactant is generally a vapor for such reactions. Alkoxylation is then suitably conducted by introducing gaseous alkylene oxide into a pressure reactor containing the liquid alkanol and the two components of the catalyst combination. For considerations of process safety, the partial pressure of the lower alkylene oxide reactant is preferably limited, for instance, to less than about 4 bar, and/or the reactant is preferably diluted with an inert gas such as nitrogen, for instance, to a vapor phase concentration of about 50 percent or less. The reaction can, however, be safely accomplished at greater alkylene oxide concentration, greater total pressure and greater partial pressure of alkylene oxide if suitable precautions, known to the art, are taken to manage the risks of explosion. A total pressure of between about 3,8 and 8,6 bar, with an alkylene oxide partial pressure between about 2,1 and 5,2 bar, is particularly preferred, while a total pressure of between about 4,5 and 7,3 bar, with an alkylene oxide partial pressure between about 2,4 and 4,5 bar, is considered more preferred. After the ethoxylation reaction has been completed, the product is preferably neutralized to deactivate the catalyst. Neutralization is suitably accomplished by the addition of a base such as sodium or potassium hydroxide to the acidic product mixture. Neutralized catalyst residues are very suitably left in the product, or may be removed if desired, for example, by precipitation or extraction or the like. The alkoxylate prepared in the process of the invention is typically a product of very acceptable quality, having a relatively low content of polyalkylene glycols and other by-products, as well as a low content of residual alkanol reactant. Although the content of residual alkanol will vary from one alkoxylation product to another, and is dependent upon the degree of alkoxylation, i.e., the average alkylene oxide adduct number, the residual alkanol content of a product prepared according to the invention and having a given average adduct number is less than than the content of residual alkanol in a product of like average adduct number which has been prepared according to conventional acid-catalyzed alkoxylation. The following Examples and Comparative Experiments are provided to further illustrate certain specific aspects of the invention but are not intended to limit its broader scope. Except as noted otherwise, each of the Examples and Comparative Experiments was conducted under the following procedure. All alkoxylation reactions were conducted in a one-liter stainless steel autoclave reactor. In each case, the alkylene oxide reactant consisted of ethylene oxide and the alkanol reactant was a NEODOL 23 Alcohol (NEODOL is a trademark of Shell Chemical Company) characterized as a mixture of primary, 80% linear (20% branched) alkanols having twelve and thirteen carbon atoms (about 40% by mole C₁₂ and 60% by mole C₁₃). Initially, the liquid alkanol reactant was dried to a water content of about 40 ppm (as indicated by Karl Fischer water analysis) by sparging with nitrogen at 130°C for one hour. Except as otherwise indicated, About 2.0 grams (0.01 mol) of the first (aluminum compound) catalyst component was dissolved in about 150 grams (0.773 mol) of the dried alkanol in a multineck glass round-bottom flask at 100°C. The reaction solution was cooled to about 30°C at which point about 0.5 gram (0.005 mol) of the second (phosphorus-containing acid) component was dissolved in the alkanol solution, producing a clear, colorless solution. This solution was transferred to the autoclave under a nitrogen atmosphere, and the reactor sealed and heated to 120°C. A mixture of nitrogen and ethylene oxide was then introduced into the reactor to a total pressure of 5,2 bar (3,1 bar nitrogen and 2,1 bar ethylene oxide). Alkoxylation (ethoxylation) commenced immediately. Temperature of the exothermic reaction mixture was allowed to rise to 140°C and cooling was then applied to the reactor to maintain that temperature. Ethylene oxide was added to the reactor on demand, that is, at a rate necessary to maintain approximately constant pressure. Sufficient ethylene oxide was added to the reactor to produce a product having the desired average ethylene oxide adduct number. Ethylene oxide introduction was then discontinued and the reactor was maintained at 140°C for an additional hour, to substantially consume unreacted ethylene oxide in the system. At the end of this hour, the reactor was cooled to 90°C, and the product was transferred under nitrogen atmosphere to a sample bottle and, if necessary, neutralized with base (i.e., potassium hydroxide) to a pH of about 6.5. The product was analyzed by GC-LC techniques to determine the mean average adduct number of the ethoxylate, the ethylene oxide adduct distribution of the ethoxylate, the content of residual alkanol reactant in the product, and the quantity of polyethylene glycol by-products formed. Example 1 Example 1 followed the general procedures outlined above, utilizing 0.4 gram (0.002 mol) of aluminum isopropoxide (Al(OR)₃, where R is isopropyl) as the first catalyst component and 0.11 gram of concentrated (85%w) ortho-phosphoric acid (0.001 mol of phosphoric acid) as the second catalyst component. During the alkoxylation reaction, 75 gram (2.2 mol) of ethylene oxide was added to the autoclave over a period of 30 minutes. The alkanol ethoxylate product was found to have a mean average adduct number of 2.0 and to contain 4.4%w of residual alkanol reactant. The product also contained 0.6%w polyethylene glycols (PEG). The ethylene oxide adduct distribution of the product is presented in Table I and compared with that of (1) an ethoxylate of equivalent mean adduct number which was produced using a conventional potassium hydroxide catalyst and (2) with a (calculated) Poisson distribution as is characteristic of conventional acid (boron trifluoride) catalyzed ethoxylation reactions. The distribution for the Example is substantially more narrow than that which is characteristic of conventional base-catalyzed ethoxylation reactions, including those catalyzed by compounds of sodium or potassium or other Group I metals as well as those catalyzed by compounds of barium or other Group II metals. Moreover, the distribution is more narrow than that obtained using conventional acid catalysts such as phosphoric acid. Example 2 For Example 2, the general procedures were again followed as in Example 1, with the addition of separate processing step for the conversion of substantially all of the aluminum isopropoxide to an aluminum alkoxide of the C₁₂ and C₁₃ alkanols. After the addition of the aluminum isopropoxide catalyst component to 200 grams of the dried alkanol reactant, and before the addition of the phorphoric acid to the mixture, the mixture was heated to 100°C and maintained at this temperature under a nitrogen sparge for one half hour. Under these conditions, a transalcoholysis reaction occurred between the aluminum isopropoxide and the C₁₂ and C₁₃ alkanols. Isopropanol released by alcoholysis was removed from the system by the nitrogen sparge. Following the transalcoholysis, the phosphoric acid catalyst component was added to the mixture. A total of 158 grams of ethylene oxide was added to the reactor during the ethoxylation reaction, over a period of 2 hours. The product was determined to have a mean average adduct number of 3.4, and to contain 3.3%w residual alcohol and 0.7%w PEG. The ethoxylate distibution was similar to that obtained in Example 1. Example 3 For Example 3, the general procedures were again followed as in Example 1, with the exception that the order ot the addition of the two catalyst components was reversed. In this example, the phosphoric acid component was added to the alkanol prior to the addition of the aluminum isopropoxide catalyst component. Specifically, 0.29 gram of 85%w ortho-phosphoric acid (0.0025 mol) was added to 150 grams of alkanol and the resultant solution heated to 130C under nitrogen sparge for one hour. The mixture was cooled to 100C and 1.0 gram (0.005 mol) of aluminum isopropoxide was added. The homogeneous mixture was then transferred to the autoclave. A total of 73 grams of ethylene oxide was added to the reactor during the ethoxylation reaction, over a period of 60 minutes. The product was determined to have a mean average adduct number of 2.1, and to contain 11.4%w residual alcohol and 0.9%w PEG. Ethylene oxide adduct distribution for the product is presented in Table II, together with a comparative Poisson distribution. Example 4 An alkoxylation process according to the invention was carried out using a catalyst which contained the two catalyst components in a molar ratio of 0.3:1, i.e., 0.3 parts of the phosphoric acid and one part of the aluminum isopropoxide. For this purpose, about 1.0 gram (0.005 mol) of the aluminum component was dissolved in 150 grams of the predried alkanol reactant at 100°C. The mixture was then cooled to 40°C, and about 0.17 gram (0.0017 mol) of the phosphoric acid was added. A total of 73 grams of ethylene oxide was consumed over a period of 60 minutes. The product had a mean average adduct number of 2.1, and contained 9.7%w residual alcohol and 0.4%w PEG. The ethylene oxide distribution of this product was similar to that obtained in Example 3 and is illustrated in Table III. Example 5 An alkoxylation process according to the invention was conducted using a catalyst which contained the two catalyst components in a molar ratio of 1:1, i.e., one part of the aluminum isopropoxide component and one part of the phosphoric acid. For this purpose, about 1.0 gram (0.005 mol) of the aluminum component was dissolved in 150 grams of the predried alkanol reactant at 100°C. The mixture was then cooled to 40°C, and about 0.5 gram (0.005 mol) of the phosphoric acid was added. A total of about 75 grams of ethylene oxide was consumed over a period of 30 minutes. The product had a mean average adduct number of 2.1, and contained 10.1%w residual alcohol and 1.8%w PEG. The ethylene oxide distribution of the product was similar to that obtained in Example 4 (see Table III). Example 6 For Example 6, phosphonoacetic acid was used as the phosphorus acid catalyst component. About 1.0 gram (0.005 mol) of aluminum isopropoxide was dissolved in 150 grams of alkanol reactant at 100°C. About 0.35 gram (0.0025 mol) of phosphonoacetic acid, (HOOCCH₂)P(O)(OH)₂, was added to the mixture at 100°C. A total of 68 grams of ethylene oxide was added over a period of 120 minutes. The product had a mean average adduct number of 2.0, and contained 9.7%w residual alcohol and 1.0%w PEG. The ethylene oxide distribution of the product was similar to that obtained in Example 4 (see Table III). Comparative Experiment A An alkoxylation process was conducted under the general procedures outlined above, but in the absence of the aluminum catalyst component, and thus not in accordance with the invention. The only catalyst employed in this experiment was ortho-phosphoric acid. About 0.3 gram (0.003 mol) of anhydrous phosphoric acid was dissolved in 150 grams (0.773 mol) of predried alkanol at 40°C. (No aluminum compound was added to this mixture.) The solution was transferred to the reactor and contacted with ethylene oxide under the general procedures. No reaction was observed after 2 hours at 140°C. The alkanol feedstock was recovered essentially unchanged. Comparative Experiment B An alkoxylation process was conducted under the same general procedures, but in the absence of a phosphorus-containing acid catalyst component, and thus not in accordance with the invention. The only catalyst employed in this experiment was aluminum isopropoxide. About 1.0 gram (0.005 mol) of aluminum isopropoxide was mixed with 150 grams (0.774 mol) of the dried alkanol reactant at 100°C. The mixture was transferred to the reactor and ethoxylated according to the general procedures. No reaction was observed after 2 hours at 140°C. The starting alkanol reactant was recovered essentially unchanged. Comparative Experiment C Comparative Experiment C illustrates that aluminum phosphate is appreciably less active and selective as an alkoxylation catalyst than the combination of catalyst components specified for use in the current invention. A total of 1.0 gram (0.0084 mol) of 99.99%w pure aluminum phosphate was added to 150 grams (0.774 mol) of predried alkanol reactant producing a hazy solution containing some insoluble matter. The reaction mixture was transferred to the reactor and ethoxylated under conditions used in the previous Examples. A total of 100 grams of ethylene oxide was added over a two hour period. The product had a mean average adduct number of 2.5, but contained 5.2%w PEG. The ethoxylate distribution was similar to those illustrated in Table III. Comparative Experiment D Comparative Experiment D illustrates the critical nature of the requirement that the molar ratio of phosphorus-containing acid component to aluminum catalyst component be no more than about 2.5. For this experiment, about 1.0 gram (0.005 mol) of aluminum isopropoxide was dissolved in 150 grams of the predried alkanol reactant at 150°C. The mixture was cooled to 40°C, and about 1.5 grams (0.015 mol) of ortho-phosphoric acid was added. Ethylene oxide was added, but no reaction was observed after 150 minutes. The alkanol was recovered essentially unchanged. Comparative Experiment E Comparative Experiment E illustrates that aluminum acetylacetonate is ineffective for alkoxylation when used as a catalyst component. For this purpose, 2.1 grams (0.0066 mol) of aluminum acetylacetonate was dissolved in 200 grams of predried alkanol at 100°C. The solution was cooled to 40°C, and 0.35 gram (0.0035 mol) of phosphoric acid was added. The reaction mixture was transferred to the reactor and ethoxylated under the standard conditions. No reaction was observed after 90 minutes. The alkanol was isolated unchanged.

Claims: A process for the preparation of an alkanol alkoxylate product characterized by a narrow-range alkylene oxide adduct distribution and by a low content of residual alkanol, which comprises contacting and reacting an alkylene oxide reactant comprising one or more C₂ to C₄ vicinal alkylene oxides with an alkanol reactant comprising one or more C₆ to C₃₀ alkanols in the presence of a catalytically effective amount of a catalyst prepared by contacting (i) one or more phosphorus-containing acids and (ii) one or more aluminum compounds selected from the group consisting of aluminum alcoholates and aluminum phenolates, the molar ratio of (i) to (ii) being in the range from 0.1:1 to 2.5:1 A process according to claim 1, wherein the alkylene oxide reactant consists essentially of ethylene oxide. A process according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the alkanol reactant consists essentially of one or more C₈-C₂₀ primary mono-hydric alkanols. A process according to claim 3, wherein the alkanol reactant consists essentially of one or more C₉-C₁₈ primary mono-hydric alkanols. A process according to one or more of the claims 1-4, wherein the one or more phosphorus-containing acids are selected from the group consisting of the ortho-, hypo-, and pyro- forms of both phosphoric and phosphorous acid, the metal and alkyl, aryl, arylalkyl, and alkylaryl dihydrogen phosphates, and the alkyl, aryl, arylalkyl, and alkylaryl phosphinic and phosphonic acids. A process according to claim 5, wherein the one or more phosphorus-containing acids are selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₂₀ alkyl, aryl, alkylaryl, and arylalkyl dihydrogen phosphates. A process according to claim 5, wherein component (i) of the catalyst is orthophosphoric acid. A process according to one or more of the claims 1-7, wherein the one or more aluminum compounds have the formula wherein at least one of X¹, X², and X³ represents an -OR moiety, wherein R is selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₃₀ alkyl and optionally alkyl substituted phenyl moieties. A process according to claim 8, wherein at least one of X¹, X², and X³ represents an -OR moiety, wherein R is C₁ to C₃₀ alkyl. A process according to claim 8, wherein each of X¹, X², and X³ represents an -OR moiety wherein R is an alkyl group having a carbon number in the range from 1 to 30. A process according to claims 1-10, wherein the molar ratio of (i) to (ii) is in the range of from 0,1:1 to 2:1. A process according to claim 11, wherein the molar ratio of (i) to (ii) is in the range of from 0,3:1 to 1:1. A process according to claim 12, wherein molar ratio of (i) to (ii) is in the range from 0.4:1 to 0.6:1. A process according to one or more of the claims 1-13, wherein the reaction is performed at a temperature in the range of from 70 °C to 200 °C.

Inventors: EDWARDS, CHARLES LEE
Applicants: SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ B.V.
Application year: 1987
Main classification: C07C41
IPC codes: C07C41, B01J31, C07C43, C07B61, C07C67