ANTISEPTIC COMPOSITIONS

Abstract: Antiseptic compositions suitable for use in skin cleansing and disinfection, eg handwashing, comprising (i) a chlorhexidine salt; (ii) an aromatic alcohol; (iii) 10% or less by weight of surfactant; and (iv) an inert diluent or carrier are described. The compositions are useful in surgical prac­ tice, eg as a pre-operative scrub, and in routine hygeinic handwashing.

Description: ANTISEPTIC COHPOSITIONS This invention relates to cleansing compositions, in particular cleansing compositions containing the antibacterial compound chlorhexidine or a salt thereof, which are suitable for skin cleansing and disinfection, e.g. handwashing. The compositions of the invention may therefore be useful in surgical practice, eg as a pre-operative scrub, and they may also be used by hospital and medical staff in routine hygeinic handwashing. Our British Patent Specification No. 1338003 describes cleansing compositions comprising from 0.5 to 10X by weight of a soluble salt of chlorhexidine, together with certain polyoxye thyl ene-polyoxypropylene block copolymers known as Pluronic surfactants, which are preferably present at 10-30Z, ideally 252 by weight of the composition. Purther surfactants such as amine oxide foaming agents (e.g. lauryldimethylamine oxide) are preferably present in the composition at about 3.75: by weight so that the total surfactant concentration is ideally about 28.75 . The compositions of the said British Patent Specification may also contain perfumes, colouring agents and, as preservatives, isopropyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol, methyl p-hydroxybenzoate and propyl p-hydroxybenzoate. We have now found that the antibacterial effect of compositions containing chlorhexidine salts may be increased by the use of a certain defined class of preservatives which generally have a synergistic effect in combination with chlorhexidine salts, and that in order to obtain the optimum antibacterial effect from the compositions of the invention they should contain a reduced amount of surfactant compared to the compositions of British Patent Specification 1338003. Accordingly the invention provides an antiseptic composition suitable for use in skin cleansing and disinfection, e.g. handwashing, comprising; (i) a chlorhexidine salt; (ii) an aromatic alcohol; (iii) 10% or less by weight of surfactant; and (iv) an inert diluent or carrier. It is desirable that the compositions should contain a salt of chlorhexidine which is soluble to the extent of at least 0.5Z w/v in water at ambient temperature. Suitable such salts are, for example, those formed with gluconic2 2-hydroxyethanesulphonic, formic, acetic, glutamic, succinnic, diglycolic, methanesulphonic, lactic, isobutyric and glucoheptonic acids and of these, the digluconate is particularly preferred. The chlorhexidine salt is preferably present at a concentration of 0.1 to 10% by weight of the composition, advantageously about 1-4x. The aromatic alcohol may be for example1 a compound of the formula EMI2.1 wherein R is a (1-4C)alkyl group or a halogen atom, A is a (1-4G) alkylene group, p is O to 5 and n is O or 1, for example a phenyl (1-4C)alkanol e.g. benzyl alcohol, 2-phenyl ethanol or 3-phenyl propanol or a phenoxy Cl- 4C)alkanol e.g. 2-phenoxyethanol. Derivatives of the above compounds wherein the benzene ring is substituted by 1-4C alkyl (e.g. methyl) or halo (e.g. chloro) substituents may also be suitable. Examples are p-chloro2-phenoxyethanol and Propylene Phenoxetol" available from Nipa Laboratories Limited. The preferred aromatic alcohols are benzyl alcohol and 2-phenoxyethanol. 2-phenoxyethanol is particularly preferred. The aromatic alcohol is preferably present at a minimum concentration of about 0.2X by weight. The maximum concentration will be determined by the solubility of the alcohol, and will generally be not more than about 4%. Preferably the concentration of alcohol will be about 1-2%. The surfactant may be of the type described in British Patent No. 1338003, i.e. non-ionic surfactants which are all members of a class of polyoxyethylene/polyoxypropylene block copolymers of the general formula: EMI3.1 wherein a, b and c are integers, having molecular weights between 1000 and 16000, and in which the terminal polyoxyethylene chains represent 10-802 of the molecule, which copolymers are available cpmmercially under the trade name "Pluronic". Particularly preferred Pluronic's are those with a polyoxypropylene typical molecular weight of about 2250, and containing 40 to 70% of polyoxyethylene, that is "Pluronic"s P84, P85 and F87, which possess the optimum combination of foaming ability, mild detergency, viscosity, water solubility and non-irritancy. The Pluronic surfactant of choice is "Pluronic" F87. Further surfactants described in British Patent Application 1338003 may be included, for example an amine oxide foaming agent. Suitable amine oxide foaming agents are, for example, cetyldimethylamine oxide, lauryldimethylamine oxide, cetylmethylmyristyl- amine oxide, dimethylmyristylamine oxide, and amidoalkyldimethylamine oxides e.g. C7-17 fatty acid amidopropyldimethylamine oxides as sold by Th. Goldschmidt A. G. under the trade name zAminoxid . Other surfactants which may be used include betaine surfactants, for example fatty acid amidoalkyl-N-dimethylaminoacetic acid betaines for example C7-17 fatty acid amidopropyl-N-dimethyl- aminoacetic acid betaines as sold by Th. Goldschmidt A. G. under the trade name wTego-Betain". Further sufactants which may be used include imidazoline derivatives, e.g. Monateric CA-35 available from Mona Industries, Inc; and alkanolamides e.g. monoand diethanolamides. The above surfactants may be used singly or in combination, the total amount of surfactant in the composition being 10% by weight or less, preferably less than about 5% and advantageously less than about 2%. The inert diluent or carrier is conveniently water. As certain surfactants e.g. those of the Pluronic type have, in addition to their surface activity, the effect of acting as "thickeners", it may be advantageous to add additional thickeners to compositions of the invention which contain no or little such surfactants. Suitable thickeners include high molecular weight polyethylene glycols, for example with molecular weight 15-20,000 (eg PEG 20,000). The concentration of thickener used will vary depending on the amount and type of surfactant used but may be for example from about 0 to 8%, advantageously about 1-5Z by weight. It may also be desirable for the compositions of the invention to contain additives ("foam enhancers") which enhance the quality of the foam or lather produced in use, e.g. its stability and 'feel'. Suitable such additives include those sold under the trade name "Glucam" (available from Amerchol) and low molecular weight (e.g. about 400) polyethylene glycols (eg PEG 400). Such additives are advantageously used at about 1-4Z, advantageously about 1-2: by weight. Because the present compositions contain a lower concentration of surfactant compared with those of British Patent 1338003 the present compositions may be of lower foamability. It may therefore be desirable to dispense the present compositions via a foam generating dispenser. Suitable such dispensers are described, for example, in published European Patent Applications Nos. 19582 and 79853. Compositions according to the invention may also be formulated as gels. Such gels may contain increased amounts of thickeners and also may contain gelling agents. It is also advantageous to adjust the pH of the compositions to between 5 and 8, to optimise the activity of the compositions. Suitable agents for adjusting the pH of the compositions are, for example, d-gluconolactone, sodium hydroxide solution or the acid from which the anion of the chlorhexidine salt in use is derived, eg gluconic acid. The compositions may also contain a buffering agent, e.g. sodium acetate. The compositions may contain perfumes and colouring agents if required. These are not essential to the performance of the composition but may be desirable from the point of view of user acceptability. The compositions may be prepared by adding the ingredients to purified water in any convenient order and mixing until the desired solution is obtained. It is generally convenient to add the chlorhexidine salt to the water first, followed by any solid components (eg PEG 20,000) which should be added with care to ensure even dispersion without formation of lumps. The surfactants and other ingredients are conveniently added next, followed by adjustment of the pH to the desired value. Finally further purifed water is added if required to bring composition to the required dilution. Table 1 demonstrates the advantageous antibacterial effects of mixtures of chlorhexidine digluconate and certain aromatic alcohols in comparison with corresponding mixtures with the preservatives mentioned in British Patent 1338003. The figures indicate the loglo reduction of the population of Staph. aureus CTC4163 upon exposure for one minute to (i) the preservative alone; (ii) chlorhexidine digluconate alone; and (iii) the mixture of chlorhexidine digluconate and the preservative. The test was performed in the presence of 10X broth to simulate organic soiling. The proportions used are indicated in the figures in brackets following the name of the ingredient. The method used to obtain the figures is based on British Standard 3286 (1960). One ml of a 24 hour tryptone soya broth (TSB) culture of Staph aureus NCTC4163 was added to 9 ml of the solution under test and a water control and thoroughly mixed. A 1 ml aliquot was removed after the appropriate time interval and immediately added to 9 ml of TSB containing 3% azolectin and 20% Tween 80 to neutralise the antiseptic carried over. Dilutions were then prepared from this in TSB containing 0.75Z azolectin and 5Z Tween 80. Viable counts were then performed on the test solution and water controls using pour-plate and spiralplating techniques. Tryptone soya agar (TSA) plates containing 0.3t azalectin and 2% Tween 80 to enable antiseptic neutralisation were used as growth medium. When chlorhexidine concentrations greater than 1% were tested, 1% suramin (Germanin, Bayer 205) was included in the pour-plate agar for additional neutralisation. Tests were carried out prior to any study to ensure that the neutraliser system was adequate for the concentrations of chlorhexidine salts and alcohols tested. Prom the viable counts, log10 survivor counts/ml of test solution were obtained, and by subtracting these from the water control counts, the log1O reduction in the population of the organisms achieved after the chosen contact time was determined. Table I Bactericidal activity of various preservatives alone and in combination vith chlorohexidine digluconate. EMI8.1 <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> LOG10 <SEP> REDUCTION <SEP> S <SEP> AUREUS <SEP> (NCTC4163) <SEP> : <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> AFTER <SEP> ONE <SEP> MINUTE <SEP> CONTACT <SEP> TIME <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> PRESERVATIVE <SEP> PRESERVATIVE <SEP> PRESERVATIVE <tb> ALONE <SEP> +0.5% <SEP> CHLORHEXIDINE <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> DIGLUCONATE <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> chlorhexidine <tb> digluconate <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> (0.5X) <SEP> I <SEP> 3.1 <SEP> 1 <SEP> - <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> (comparison) <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> 2-phenoxyethanol <SEP> < 1.5 <SEP> > 7.4 <tb> (2%) <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> 2-phenylethanol <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> (2x) <SEP> I <SEP> < 1.5 <SEP> 1 <SEP> > <SEP> 7.4 <SEP> 1 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> benzylalcohol <SEP> I <SEP> < 1.5 <SEP> 1 <SEP> > <SEP> 7.4 <tb> I <SEP> (2%) <SEP> I <SEP> <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> <tb> I <SEP> I <tb> "Propylene- <SEP> < 1.5 <SEP> > 7.4 <tb> I <SEP> Phenoxetol" <SEP> I <SEP> # <SEP> <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> (1%) <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> p-chloro-2- <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> Iphenoxyethanol <SEP> 1 <SEP> 2.3 <SEP> 1 <SEP> )7.4 <SEP> 1 <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> Continued........... Table 1 continued.... EMI9.1 <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> LOG10 <SEP> REDUCTION <SEP> S <SEP> AUREUS <SEP> (NCTC4163) <SEP> 1 <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> AFTER <SEP> ONE <SEP> MINUTE <SEP> CONTACT <SEP> TIMES <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> PRESERVATIVE <SEP> PRESERVATIVE <SEP> I <SEP> PRESERVATIVE <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> ALONE <SEP> +0.5% <SEP> CHLORHEXIDINE <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> DIGLUCONATE <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ <SEP> # <SEP> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ <SEP> I <tb> 3-phenylpropanol <SEP> 4.1 <SEP> > 7.4 <tb> I <SEP> (2Z) <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> n-propanol <SEP> < 1.5 <SEP> 4.6 <tb> I <SEP> (2X) <SEP> # <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> iso-propanol <SEP> I <SEP> 4 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> I <SEP> 4.2 <tb> I <SEP> (2Z) <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> methyl- <SEP> < 1.5 <SEP> 4.4 <tb> hydroxybenzoate <tb> (0.1%) <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> propyl- <SEP> < 1.5 <SEP> 4.0 <tb> I <SEP> hyroxybenzoate <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> (0.01%) <tb> ethanol <SEP> < 1.5 <SEP> 3.9 <tb> I <SEP> (22) <SEP> 1 <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> The invention is illustrated, but not limited, by the following Examples. Example 1 Handwash formulations were made up containing the following ingredients in the proportions indicated (by weight) (1) Chlorhexidine digluconate 4Z; (2) Preservative (identified in table); (3) Pluronic F87 1.5%; (4) Lauryldimethylamine oxide 0.5Z; (S) Polyethylene glycol 20,000 2Z (6) Water (balance) The compositions were tested in a formulation similar to that described in Example I of British Patent 1338003, but in which the proportions of (3) and (4) are reduced as indicated. In view of the low amount of Pluronic surfactant present, the polylethylene glycol 20,000 has been added as thickener. The perfume and colouring agents used.in Example 1 of British Patent 1338003, which do not affect the performance of the composition in the test, have been omitted. The pH of the composition is adjusted to pH 5.5 with dgluconolactone. The results are quoted in Table 2. It will be seen that the antibacterial activity of the formulations containing aromatic alcohols is much higher than that of the formulations containing isopropanol and ethanol. The 4% isopropanol composition is directly comparable with Example 1 of British Patent 1338003. It can be seen that the compositions of the present invention are superior in performance to this composition. TABLE 2 EMI11.1 <tb> FORMULATION <SEP> LOG10REDUCTION <SEP> S.AUREUS <tb> I <SEP> (PRESERVATIVE) <SEP> I <SEP> (NCTC4163) <SEP> AFTER <SEP> ONE <SEP> MINUTE <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> CONTACT <SEP> TINE <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <tb> # <tb> I <SEP> none <SEP> (control) <SEP> I <SEP> 2.0 <tb> <SEP> # <tb> I <SEP> Benzyl <SEP> alcohol <SEP> (2Z) <SEP> I <SEP> > 7.2 <SEP> <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> 2-Phenoxyethanol <SEP> (2Z) <SEP> I <SEP> > 7.2 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> 2-Phenylethanol <SEP> (2Z) <SEP> I <SEP> > 7.2 <SEP> <tb> <SEP> # <tb> 1 <SEP> 3-Phenylpropanol <SEP> (2Z) <SEP> I <SEP> > <SEP> 7.2 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> Isopropanol <SEP> (2X) <SEP> I <SEP> 2.3 <tb> # <tb> I <SEP> Isopropanol <SEP> (4%) <SEP> 1 <SEP> 3.1 <SEP> 1 <tb> Ethanol <SEP> (2%) <SEP> 2.4 <tb> Examples 2-20 The formulations specified in Table 3 were tested by the method described above but using the microorganism Staph. aureus ATCC 6538. The log10 reduction of the population of this organism after 1 minute contact time is given in Table 4. All the formulations show very good or excellent antibacterial activity. TABLE 3 EMI13.1 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> X <SEP> by <SEP> weight <SEP> in <SEP> composition <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> of <SEP> Example <SEP> Not <SEP> I <SEP> <tb> Component <SEP> (1) <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> 2 <SEP> 3 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 5 <SEP> 6 <SEP> 1 <tb> I <SEP> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ <SEP> I <SEP> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ <SEP> <SEP> I <tb> IChlorhexidine <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> digluconate <SEP> I <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 1 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> IPEG <SEP> 20,000 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 1 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> IPolymer <SEP> JR <SEP> 30M <SEP> (2) <SEP> I <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> 0.1 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> I <tb> # <tb> <SEP> "Aminoxid" <SEP> W535(3) <SEP> I <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> - <SEP> I <tb> <RTI ID=13.5> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> <tb> I"Tego-Betain" <SEP> L5351(4)l <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> 2 <SEP> 1 <tb> # <tb> IPEG <SEP> 400 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <SEP> I <tb> 12-phenoxyethanol <SEP> 1 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 1 <tb> Sodium <SEP> acetate <SEP> - <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <tb> <SEP> "Glucam" <SEP> E20 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> <tb> "Ammonyx2 <SEP> Lo(5) <SEP> I <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> 2 <SEP> 1 <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> <tb> <SEP> "Abil" <SEP> B8834(6) <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> <tb> <SEP> "Natrosol" <SEP> 250HHR(7) <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> Table 3 continued..... Table 3 continued........... EMI14.1 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> X <SEP> by <SEP> veight <SEP> in <SEP> composition <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> of <SEP> Example <SEP> Nos <SEP> I <tb> Component(1) <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> <SEP> 7 <SEP> 8 <SEP> 9 <SEP> 10 <SEP> 11 <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ <SEP> I <SEP> <SEP> I <SEP> <tb> Chlorhexidine <tb> digluconate <SEP> I <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 1 <tb> PEG <SEP> 20,000 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <tb> IPolymer <SEP> JR <SEP> 30H <SEP> (2) <SEP> I <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> 0.1 <SEP> 0.1 <SEP> <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> <tb> "Aminoxid" <SEP> #S35(3) <SEP> <SEP> I <SEP> <SEP> 3 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> "Tego-Betain" <SEP> L5351(4)l <SEP> 2 <SEP> 3 <SEP> 2 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> # <SEP> <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> <tb> IPEG <SEP> 400 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <tb> <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> 12-phenoxyethanol <SEP> 1 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 1 <tb> <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Sodium <SEP> acetate <SEP> 1 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 1 <SEP> <tb> # <tb> <SEP> "Glucam <SEP> E20 <SEP> I <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> "Ammonyx <SEP> LO(5) <SEP> I <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <tb> <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> "Abil" <SEP> B8834(6) <SEP> I <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 1 <tb> <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> "Natrosol" <SEP> 250HHR(7) <SEP> I <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> 0.08 <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> Table 3 continued...... Table 3 continued........... EMI15.1 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> % <SEP> by <SEP> weight <SEP> in <SEP> composition <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> of <SEP> Example <SEP> No. <SEP> I <tb> Component(1) <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> 12 <SEP> 13 <SEP> 14 <SEP> 15 <SEP> 16 <SEP> 1 <tb> I <SEP> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ <SEP> I <SEP> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ <SEP> <SEP> I <tb> Chlorhexidine <tb> I <SEP> digluconate <SEP> 1 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 1 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> IPEG <SEP> 20,000 <SEP> 1 <SEP> - <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> IPolymer <SEP> JR <SEP> 30M <SEP> (2) <SEP> I <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> I"Aminoxid" <SEP> WS35(3) <SEP> I <SEP> - <SEP> 3 <SEP> 4.5 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 2.5 <SEP> 1 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I"Tego-Betain" <SEP> L5351(4); <SEP> - <SEP> 3 <SEP> '4.5 <SEP> <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2.5 <SEP> 1 <tb> # <tb> IPEG <SEP> 400 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <SEP> - <SEP> 2 <SEP> 4 <SEP> - <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> 12-phenoxyethanol <SEP> t <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> I <tb> Sodium <SEP> acetate <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <tb> <SEP> "Glucam" <SEP> E20 <SEP> - <SEP> 2 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> 2 <tb> <SEP> "Ammonyx" <SEP> L0(5) <SEP> 1 <SEP> 4 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> "Abil" <SEP> B8834(6) <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> <tb> <SEP> I"Natrosol" <SEP> 250HHR(7) <SEP> I <SEP> 0.08 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> Table 3 continued..... Table 3 continued........... EMI16.1 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> X <SEP> by <SEP> weight <SEP> in <SEP> composition <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> of <SEP> Example <SEP> Not <SEP> # <SEP> <tb> Component(1) <tb> I <SEP> # <SEP> 17 <SEP> 18 <SEP> 19 <SEP> 20 <tb> <SEP> # <tb> IChlorhexidine <SEP> I <SEP> I <SEP> <tb> Idigluconate <SEP> I <SEP> 4 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2.5 <SEP> 4 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> IPEG <SEP> 20,000 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 1 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> Polymer <SEP> JR <SEP> 30M <SEP> (2) <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> I"Aminoxid" <SEP> #S35(3) <SEP> <SEP> 1 <SEP> 2.5 <SEP> 2.5 <SEP> 2.5 <SEP> 2.5 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> "Tego-Betain" <SEP> L5351(4) <SEP> 2.5 <SEP> 2.5 <SEP> 2.5 <SEP> 2.5 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> IPEG <SEP> 400 <SEP> 1 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <tb> 2-phenoxyethanol <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> 1.5 <tb> Sodium <SEP> acetate <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> "Glucam" <SEP> E20 <SEP> I <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <tb> I <SEP> I <tb> "Ammonyx" <SEP> LO(5) <SEP> I <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> I <tb> I <SEP> I <SEP> I <tb> "Abil" <SEP> B8834(6) <SEP> 1 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> # <tb> I"Natrosol <SEP> 250HHR(7) <SEP> I <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> <tb> # <tb> NOTES 1. Each composition additionally contains sufficient sodium hydroxide to bring the composition to pH7, with the exception of Example 2, which contains sodium hydroxide to pal5, and Example 17, which contains dgluconolactone to pH6. Each composition contains purified water to the balance of 100%. 2. "Foam enhancer , available from Union Carbide UK Ltd. 3. Supplied by Th. Goldschmidt A.G. at nominal concentration 35%. Figure in table relates to amount of solution as supplied. 4. Supplied by Th. Goldschmidt A.G. at concentration 30-342. Figure in table relates to amount of solution as supplied. 5. Amine oxide foaming agent (lauryldimethylamine oxide) available from Millnaster Onyx UK, at concentration about 30X. Figure in table relates to amount of solution as supplied. 6. "Foam enhancer"/emollient available from Th. Goldschmidt A.G. 7. "Foam enhancer"/thickener available from Hercules Ltd. TABLE 4 Microbiological Results EMI18.1 <tb> Example <SEP> I <SEP> Log10 <SEP> reduction <SEP> S. <SEP> aureus <SEP> ATCC <SEP> 6538 <SEP> in <SEP> 1 <SEP> min <tb> No. <tb> <SEP> 2 <SEP> 7.2 <tb> <SEP> 3 <SEP> 1 <SEP> > 7.2 <tb> <SEP> 4 <SEP> > 7.2 <tb> <SEP> 5 <SEP> 1 <SEP> <SEP> > 6.9 <tb> <SEP> 6 <SEP> 1 <SEP> > 6.9 <tb> <SEP> 7 <SEP> 1 <SEP> > 6.9 <tb> <SEP> 8 <SEP> > 6.9 <tb> <SEP> 9 <SEP> > 6.9 <tb> <SEP> 10 <SEP> 1 <SEP> <SEP> 5.2 <tb> <SEP> 11 <SEP> 1 <SEP> > <SEP> 6.9 <tb> <SEP> 12 <SEP> # <SEP> <SEP> > <SEP> 6.9 <tb> <SEP> 13 <SEP> 1 <SEP> > <SEP> 7.2 <tb> <SEP> 14 <SEP> 1 <SEP> > <SEP> 7.2 <tb> <SEP> 15 <SEP> 1 <SEP> > <SEP> 7.2 <tb> <SEP> 16 <SEP> 1 <SEP> > <SEP> 7.1 <tb> <SEP> 17 <SEP> > 7.1 <tb> <SEP> 18 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 3.9 <tb> <SEP> 19 <SEP> 1 <SEP> > <SEP> 7.2 <tb> <SEP> 20 <SEP> > 7.2 <tb>

Claims: CLAIMS 1. An antiseptic composition suitable for use in skin cleansing and disinfection comprising (i) a chlorhexidine salt; (ii) an aromatic alcohol; (iii) 10% or less by weight of surfactant; and (iv) an inert diluent or carrier. 2. A composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein the chlorhexidine salt is soluble to the extent of at least 0.5X w/v in water at ambient temperature. 3. A composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein the chlorhexidine salt is chlorhexidine digluconate. 4. A composition as claimed in any of claims 1-3 wherein the chlorhexidine salt is present at a concentration of from 1 to 4Z by weight of the composition. 5. A composition as claimed in any of claims 1-4 wherein the aromatic alcohol has the formula I EMI19.1 wherein R is a (l-4C)alkyl group or a halogen atom, A is a (l-4C)alkylene group, P is O to 5 and n is O or 1. 6. A composition as claimed in claim 5 wherein the aromatic alcohol is 2-phenoxyethanol or benzyl alcohol. 7. A composition as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the aromatic alcohol is present at a concentration of from 1 to 2Z by weight. 8. A composition as claimed in any preceding claim in which the surfactant is (i) a polyoxyethylene/polyoxypropylene block copolymer of the general formula EMI20.1 wherein a, b and c are integers, having molecular weights between 1000 and 1600, and in which the terminal polyoxyethylene chains represent 10-80Z of the molecule; (ii) an amine oxide foaming agent; (iii) a betaine surfactant; (iv) an imidazoline derivative; (v) an alkanolamide; or a mixture of any two or more of these. 9. A composition as claimed in any preceding claim in which the inert diluent or carrier is water. 10. A composition as claimed in any preceding claim which additionally contains one or more of the following ingredients (i) a thickener; (ii) a foam enhancer; (iii) a gelling agent; (iv) a pH adjuster; (v) a buffering agent1 (vi) a perfume; or (v) a colouring agent.

Inventors: BUCKNALL, ROBERT ANTHONY, HOLLOWAY, PHILIP MICHAEL, PLATT, JOHN HENRY
Applicants: IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC
Application year: 1987
Main classification: C11D3
IPC codes: C11D3, A01N47, A61K8, A61Q17