Stereo enhancement system

Abstract: A stereo enhancement system is disclosed which provides an enhanced wider stereo image listening area. The enhancement system includes a reverberation control system for controlling the amount of artificial reverberation in the enhanced signal. The reverberation control system includes a sensing circuit (40) for detecting the amount of reverberation in left and right (or stereo sum and difference) signals, and circuitry (129) for controlling the amount of reverberation in the enhanced signals. The controlling circuitry (129) may be a filter or a dynamic equaliser. A sound perspective correction system for compensating for loudspeaker positioning is also disclosed.

Description: The disclosed invention generally relates to an enhancement system for stereo sound reproduction systems, and is particularly directed to a stereo enhancement system which broadens the stereo sound image, provides for an increased stereo listening area, and provides for perspective correction for the use of speakers or headphones. As used herein, the phrase "selectively altering the relative amplitudes of frequency components of said difference signal such that louder frequency components of said difference signal are attenuated relative to quieter frequency components of said difference signal" and similar phrases (such as "... modified such that louder frequency components of said input difference signal are attenuated relative to quieter frequency components of said input difference signal") includes both attenuation of the louder frequency components and boosting of the quieter frequency components. Equally, the phrase "selectively altering the relative amplitudes of frequency components of said sum signal such that selected sum signal components are boosted relative to other sum signal components" and similar phrases (such as "... modified such that selected input sum signal components are boosted relative to other input sum signal components") includes both boosting of the selected sum signal components and attenuation of the other components. Additionally, as used herein, the terms "boost", "enhance" and "emphasise" and the like are generally used interchangeably, as are the terms "attenuate" and "deemphasise" and the like. Also, as used herein, the term "fixed medium" includes phonograph records, digital discs, magnetic tape and the like. As is well known, a stereo sound reproduction system attempts to produce a sound image wherein the reproduced sounds are perceived as emanating from different locations, thereby simulating the experience of a live performance. The aural illusion of a stereo sound image is generally perceived as being between the speakers, and the width of the stereo image depends to a large extent on the similarity or dissimilarity between the information respectively provided to the left and right speakers. If the information provided to each speaker is the same, then the sound image will be centered between the speakers at "center stage." In contrast, if the information provided to each speaker is different, then the extent of the sound image will spread between the two speakers. While the general concept of stereo sound imaging is not complex, its use and implementation is more difficult. The width of the stereo sound image depends not only on the information provided to the speakers, but also on listener position. Ideally, the listener is equidistant from the speakers. With many speaker systems, as the listener gets closer to one speaker, the sound from the more distant speaker contributes less to the stereo image, and the sound is quickly perceived as emanating only from the closer speaker. This is particularly so when the information in each speaker is not very different. However, even with the listener equidistant from the speakers, the perceived sound image is generally between the physical locations of the speakers and does not extend beyond the region between the speakers. Some known speaker systems have been designed to reduce the limitation that a listener should ideally be located equidistant between speakers. However, such speaker systems are generally complex and the resulting stereo image is still limited to the region between the physical locations of the speakers. Another consideration in stereo sound reproduction is the fact that the sound transducers (typically speakers or headphones) are located at predetermined locations, and therefore provide sound emanating from such predetermined locations. However, in a live performance, the perceived sound may emanate from many directions as a result of the acoustics of the structure where the performance takes place. The human ears and brain cooperate to determine direction on the basis of different phenomena, including relative phase shift for low frequency sounds, relative intensity for sounds in the voice range, and relative time arrival for sounds having fast rise times and high frequency components. As a result of the predetermined locations of speakers or headphones, a listener receives erroneous cues as to the directions from which the reproduced sounds are emanating. For example, for speakers located in front of the listener, sounds that should be heard from the side are heard from the front and therefore are not readily perceived as being sounds emanating from the sides. For headphones or side mounted speakers, sounds that should emanate from the front emanate from the sides. Thus, as a result of the placement of speakers or headphones, the sound perspective of a recorded performance is incorrect. There have been numerous attempts to spread and widen the stereo image with mixed results. For example, it is known that the left and right stereo signals may be mixed to provide a difference signal (such as left minus right) and a sum signal (left plus right) which can be selectively processed and then mixed to provide processed left and right signals. Particularly, it is well known that increasing or boosting the difference signal produces a wider stereo image. However, indiscriminately increasing the difference signal creates problems since the stronger frequency components of the difference signal tend to be concentrated in the mid-range. One problem is that the reproduced sound is very harsh and annoying since the ear has greater sensitivity to the range of about 1 KHz to about 4 KHz within the mid-range (herein called the "difference signal components of greater sensitivity"). Another problem is that the listener is limited to a position that is equidistant between speakers since the mid-range includes frequencies having wavelengths comparable to the distance between a listener's ears (which have frequencies in the range of between about 1 KHz and 2 KHz). As to such frequencies (herein called the "difference signal frequency components of increased phase sensitivity"), a slight shift in the position of the listener's head provides an annoying shift in the stereo image. Moreover, the perceived widening of the stereo image resulting from indiscriminate boosting of the difference signal is small, and is clearly not worth the attendant problems. Some known stereo imaging systems require additional amplifiers and speakers. However, with such systems, the stereo image is limited by the placement of the speakers. Moreover, placing speakers at different locations does not necessarily provide the correct sound perspective. With other systems, fixed or variable delays are provided. However, such delays interfere with the accuracy of the reproduced sound since whatever delays existed in the performance that was recorded are already present in the recording. Moreover, delays introduce further complexity and limit the listener's position. There have also been attempts to correct or compensate the improper sound perspective resulting from the use of headphones. However, considerations with known headphone enhancement systems include complexity and lack of effectiveness. US-4 356 349 discloses a method of processing audio signals to achieve enhancement by delaying, by a time period which is generally less than the refractory period of the human ear, a predetermined low frequency band of audio signals and combining the signals with out-of-phase cross-field portions within a particular amplitude range. US-3 772 479 discloses an enhancement system which includes variable gain amplifiers and comparator circuits which compare the amplitude of the audio input signals and adjust the gain of the variable gain amplifiers in accordance with the ratio of the amplitudes of the audio input signals. It would be an advantage to provide a stereo enhancement system which extends the width of the stereo sound image beyond the region between the speakers. It would also be an advantage to provide a stereo enhancement system which does not place constraint on listening position. Another advantage would be to provide a stereo enhancement system which provides for a stereo sound image that may be perceived over a large listening area. Still another advantage would be to provide a stereo correction system which provides for sound perspective correction for use with speakers or headphones. The present invention as defined in the claims seeks to achieve the foregoing and other features and advantages, and includes a stereo image-enhancement system for providing a wider stereo image and listening area. A perspective correction system which provides for sound perspective correction for use with speakers or headphones is also described. The stereo image enhancement system and the perspective correction system may be utilized in combination or individually. A wider stereo sound image and listening area are achieved by generating sum and difference signals based on left and right stereo signals, selectively altering the relative amplitudes of the difference signal frequencies and the relative amplitudes of the sum signal frequencies and combining the processed sum and difference signals with the original left and right signals to produce enhanced left and right stereo signals. Particularly, selected frequency components of the difference signal are boosted (emphasised) relative to other difference signal frequency components, and selected frequency components of the sum signal are boosted relative to other sum signal frequency components. This selective alteration of the difference signal provides for a wider stereo image and a wider listening area, and the selective alteration of the sum signal can prevent the sum signal from being overwhelmed by the difference signal. In one embodiment, a spectrum analyzer that is responsive to the difference signal controls the relative amplitudes of the difference signal frequency components so that the quieter difference signal frequency components are boosted relative to louder difference signal frequency components. The difference signal is also equalized by a fixed equalizer so that the difference signal frequencies having wavelengths comparable to the distance between a listener's ears are deemphasized. The spectrum analyzer further controls the relative amplitudes of the sum signal frequency components so that sum signal frequency components are boosted in proportion to the levels of corresponding difference signal frequency components. In another embodiment, the difference signal is equalized with a fixed difference signal equalizer so that difference signal frequency components that statistically include quieter difference components are boosted relative to difference signal frequency components that statistically include louder difference signal frequencies. The sum signal is equalized with a fixed sum signal equalizer so that the sum signal in the frequency range that statistically includes difference signal frequency components are boosted. As a result of the selective alteration of the difference signal components, a wider stereo image is provided, and the harshness and image shifting problems associated with indiscriminate increase of the difference signal are substantially reduced by the equalization provided by the fixed equalizer utilized by the invention. The selective alteration of the difference signal components further enhances the stereo image for the following reasons. Ambient reflections and reverberant fields at a live performance are readily perceived and are not masked by the direct sounds. In a recorded performance, however, the ambient sounds are masked by the direct sounds, and are not perceived at the same level as at a live performance. The ambient sounds generally tend to be in the quieter frequencies of the difference signal, and boosting the quieter frequencies of the difference signal unmasks the ambient sounds, thereby simulating the perception of ambient sounds at a live performance. The selective alteration of the difference signal also provides for a wider listening area for the following reasons. The louder frequency components of the difference signal tend to be in the mid-range which includes frequencies having wavelengths comparable to the ear-to-ear distance around the head of a listener (the previously mentioned "difference signal frequency components of increased phase sensitivity"). As a result of the selective alteration provided by the invention, the difference signal frequency components of increased phase sensitivity are not inappropriately boosted. Therefore, the stereo image shifting problem resulting from indiscriminate increase of the difference signal (discussed above in the background) is substantially reduced, and the listener is not limited to being equidistant from the speakers. In providing the selective alteration of the difference signal, the amount of enhancement, which is determined by the level of the selectively boosted difference signal that is mixed, may be automatically adjusted so that the amount of stereo provided is relatively consistent. Without such automatic adjustment, the amount of enhancement provided would have to be manually adjusted for the differing amounts of stereo in different recordings. The process of selectively altering the difference signal also boosts any artificial reverberation introduced in the recording process since artificial reverberation is predominantly in the difference signal. In accordance with the invention, in order to avoid the inappropriate boosting of artificial reverberation, the enhancement system of the invention monitors the sum and difference signals for characteristics that indicate the possible presence of artificial reverberation. If the possibility of artificial reverberation is detected, the amount of boost provided for the difference signal is selectively reduced and the amount of boost for the sum signal is selectively increased. A sound perspective correction system is also described which provides perspective correction for recorded performances reproduced with speakers located at different positions or with headphones. The perspective correction system selectively modifies sum and difference signals derived from the left and right stereo signals so that the reproduced sounds are perceived as emanating from the directions a listener would expect at a live performance. Thus, with speakers located in front of the listener, sounds that should be heard as emanating from the sides are perceived as emanating from the sides. With headphones, sounds that should be heard as emanating from the front are perceived as emanating from the front. The sound perspective correction system achieves perspective correction by generating sum and difference signals from left and right stereo signals, providing fixed equalization for the sum and difference signals to compensate for the variation with direction of the frequency response of the human ear, and combining the equalized sum and difference signals to produce left and right signals. For speakers located in front of the listener, the difference signal is selectively boosted so that side sounds are restored to the appropriate levels that would have been perceived had they been reproduced to emanate from the sides. For speakers located to the side or for headphones, the sum signal is selectively attenuated to restore front sounds to the appropriate levels that would have been perceived had they been reproduced to emanate from the front. As indicated previously, the sound perspective correction system may be utilized in conjunction with the above-summarized stereo image enhancement system of the invention or may be utilized alone with other audio components. Principles of the present invention are applicable both for playback of conventional stereo phonograph records, magnetic tapes and digital discs through a conventional sound reproducing system including a pair of loud speakers and for making unique recordings on phonograph records, digital discs or magnetic tape which recordings can be played on a conventional sound reproducing system to produce left and right stereo output signals providing the advantageous effects described above. Brief description of the drawings Preferred features of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein: FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the stereo enhancement system of the invention. FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a dynamic stereo image enhancement system in accordance with the invention which provides for dynamic equalization. FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the feedback and reverberation control circuit for the stereo image enhancement systems of FIGS. 2 and 4. FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a non-dynamic or fixed stereo image enhancement system in accordance with the invention which provides for fixed equalization. FIGS. 5A and 5B are plots of the equalization provided by the fixed stereo image enhancement system of FIG. 4. FIGS. 8 and 9 illustrate sound reproducing and sound recording systems respectively, each of which employs either or both of the stereo image enhancement and perspective correction arrangements embodying principles of the present invention. FIG. 10 is a block diagram of the stereo enhancement system having automatic and manual control of reverberation enhancement. FIG. 11 shows an alternative attenuating reverberation filter. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE In the following detailed description and in the several figures of the drawing, like elements are identified with like reference numerals. In order to facilitate the understanding of the invention, the following discussion is provided in different sections, with each subsequent section being more detailed than the previous section. Thus, an overview is first presented wherein the overall functions provided are discussed. Then, the invention is discussed in more detail with more emphasis on operating parameters. I. OVERVIEW Referring now to FIG. 1, shown therein is a block diagram of the stereo enhancement system 300 of the invention, which includes a stereo image enhancement system 100 and a perspective correction system 200. The stereo image enhancement system 100 receives left and right stereo signals L and R and processes such signals to provide image enhanced left and right stereo signals L' and R' to the perspective correction system 200. The perspective correction system 200 processes the image enhanced stereo signals to provide image enhanced stereo signals which have been corrected to provide for proper sound perspective when amplified and played through speakers or headphones. For use with standard commercially available audio components, the stereo enhancement system 300 of the invention may be utilized in the tape monitor loop or, if available, in an external processor loop of a preamplifier. Such loops are not affected by the preamplifier controls such as tone controls, balance control, and volume control. Alternatively, the stereo enhancement system 300 may be interposed between the preamplifier and power amplifier of a standard stereo sound reproduction system. However, with such installation, the balance and tone controls are preferably disabled or nulled. The disclosed stereo enhancement system 300 may be readily incorporated for production into audio preamplifiers that are manufactured and sold as separate units, as well as into audio preamplifiers that are included in integrated amplifiers and receivers. As so incorporated, the stereo enhancement system 100 is preferably upstream of the tone and balance controls and preferably is capable of being bypassed. It should be noted that the enhancement provided by the disclosed stereo enhancement system 300 can be advantageously utilized to enhance recordings. Such recordings can be played back on an audio system which does not include the stereo enhancement system 300, or an audio system which does include the stereo enhancement system 300 and which has been bypassed. Thus, for example, a recording which includes image enhancement and perspective correction can be made for playback in an automobile with side mounted speakers. It should be noted that perspective correction may not be desired in making recordings unless the playback conditions are known, e.g., that playback will be only through side mounted automobile speakers. It should also be noted that the stereo image enhancement system 100 and/or the perspective correction 200 may be utilized independently in an audio system. Thus, for example, the perspective correction system 200 alone may be incorporated into an automobile audio system for correcting the improper sound perspective caused by side mounted speakers. Also, for cost considerations, the stereo image enhancement system 100 alone may be incorporated in an audio system for home use. Referring to FIG. 2, shown therein is a block diagram of a stereo image enhancement system 10 which may be utilized as the stereo image enhancement system 100 in the stereo enhancement system 300 of FIG. 1, and which provides for dynamic equalization of the sum and difference of left and right stereo signals to achieve a wider stereo image and a wider listening area. Particularly, subsonically filtered left and right stereo signals L and R at the outputs of subsonic filters 12, 14 are provided to a difference circuit 11 and a summing circuit 13 which respectively provide a difference signal (L-R) and a sum signal (L+R). A dynamic difference signal equalizer 19, a fixed difference signal equalizer 18, and a gain controlled amplifier 22 cooperate to selectively alter or modify the relative amplitudes of the difference signal frequency components (also referred to herein as "components" or "frequencies") to provide a processed difference signal (L-R) p . A dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 selectively alters or modifies the relative amplitudes of the sum signal frequency components (also referred to herein as "components" or "frequencies" to provide a processed sum signal (L+R) p .) A spectrum analyzer 17, which is responsive to the difference signal provided by the difference circuit 11, controls the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 so that the quieter components of the difference signal are boosted relative to the louder components. More specifically, the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 is controlled to attenuate the louder difference signal components more than the quieter difference signal components. The subsequent amplification of the equalized difference signal provides for a processed difference signal wherein the quieter components have been boosted relative to the louder difference signal components. The fixed difference signal equalizer 18 selectively attenuates the equalized difference signal provided by the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 to provide deemphasis in a predetermined manner. The spectrum analyzer 17 also controls the sum signal equalizer so that components of the sum signal are boosted as a direct function of the levels of corresponding difference signal components. More specifically, the sum signal equalizer 21 boosts the sum signal to provide a processed sum signal wherein the sum signal components have been boosted in proportion to the amplitudes of correspondening difference signal amplitudes. A feedback and reverberation control circuit 30 controls the gain of the gain controlled amplifier 22 so that the amount of stereo provided is relatively consistent from recording to recording. The control circuit 30 also controls the difference signal equalizer 19 and the sum signal equalizer 21 so that difference signal components that may include artificial reverberation are not inappropriately boosted when the possibility of artificial reverberation is detected. When the possibility of artificial reverberation is detected by the control circuit 30, the reverberation control signal RCTRL controls the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 to provide further attenuation in selected frequency bands where artificial reverberation statistically occurs, and the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 to provide further boost in such selected frequency bands. In this manner, any artificial reverberation which may be present in the difference signal is not inappropriately boosted in the subsequent amplification of the difference signal. The further boost of the sum signal ensures that the sum signal frequencies in the selected frequency bands are of sufficient level to compensate any artificial reverberation which may not have been sufficiently attenuated by the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 pursuant to the reverberation control signal RCTRL. The control circuit 30 is responsive to the sum and difference signals provided by the summing circuit 13 and the difference circuit 11, and also to the processed difference signal provided by the gain controlled amplifier 22. Referring now to FIG. 4, shown therein is a block diagram of a further embodiment of a stereo image enhancement system 110 which may be utilized as the stereo image enhancement system 100 in the stereo enhancement system of FIG. 1, and which provides for respective fixed equalization of the sum and difference of left and right stereo signals to achieve a wider stereo image and a wider listening area. Particularly, subsonically filtered left and right stereo signals L and R from subsonic filters 112, 114 are provided to a difference circuit 111 and a sum circuit 113 which generate respective difference and sum signals (L-R) and (L+R). A fixed difference signal equalizer 115, a gain controlled amplifier 125, and a reverberation filter 129 cooperate to selectively boost certain difference signal components relative to other difference signal components. A fixed sum signal equalizer 117 and a gain controlled amplifier 127 cooperate to selectively boost certain sum signal components relative to other sum signal components. Effectively, the sum and difference signals are respectively spectrally shaped or equalized in a fixed predetermined manner. Particularly, the difference signal is equalized so that the frequencies where the quieter difference signal components statistically occur more frequently are boosted relative to the frequencies where the louder difference signal components statistically occur more frequently. The sum signal is equalized so that frequencies where the difference signal components statistically occur are boosted relative to other frequencies. The stereo image enhancement system 110 further includes a feedback and reverberation control circuit 40 which is substantially similar to the control circuit 30 of FIGS. 2 and 3 and provides substantially similar functions. Particularly, the control circuit 40 cooperates with the gain controlled amplifier 125 so that substantially consistent stereo is provided for differing amounts of stereo within a given recording and between different recordings. The control circuit 40 further cooperates with the gain controlled amplifier 127 and the reverberation filter 129 to compensate the effects of artificial reverberation. When the possibility of artificial reverberation is detected, the gain controlled amplifier 127 boosts the sum signal, and the reverberation filter 129 attenuates the difference signal components that statistically include artificial reverberation relative to other difference signal components. In this manner, the difference signal components that may include artificial reverberation are not inappropriately boosted. The further boost to the sum signal is to compensate for any artificial reverberation which may not have been sufficiently attenuated by the reverberation filter 129. II. DETAILED BLOCK DIAGRAM DISCUSSION A. The Dynamic Stereo Image Enhancement System Referring again to FIG. 2, the stereo image enhancement system 10 of the invention includes a left input signal subsonic filter 12 and a right input signal subsonic filter 14 which are responsive to left and right stereo signals L and R provided by a stereo sound reproduction system (not shown). For example, the left and right stereo signals L and R may be provided by a preamplifier tape monitor loop output. The subsonic filters 12, 14 provide subsonically filtered input signals L in and R in to a difference circuit 11 and a summing circuit 13. Each of the subsonic filters 12, 14 is a high pass filter having a -3 dB frequency of 30 Hz and a roll-off of 24 dB per octave. The sharp roll-off provides some protection against damage to speakers in the event a phono cartridge is accidentally dropped. Vertical displacement of a stylus due to dropping a phono cartridge is manifested as low frequency difference signal components with large amplitudes, which could be potentially damaging to speakers. The sharp subsonic filter roll-off cuts off such low frequency components to reduce the possibility of damage. The difference circuit 11 subtracts the right subsonically filtered signal R in from the left subsonically filtered signal L in to provide a difference signal (L-R), while the summing circuit 13 adds the left and right subsonically filtered input signals L in and R in to provide a sum signal (L+R). The difference signal (L-R) is provided to a multi-band spectrum analyzer 17. The difference signal (L-R) is further provided to a multi-band dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 which is controlled by control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer 17. The sum signal (L+R) is provided to a multi-band dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 which is also controlled by the control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer 17. The multi-band spectrum analyzer 17 is responsive to predetermined frequency bands and provides respective control signals associated with each of the predetermined frequency bands. Particularly, such control signals are proportional to respective average amplitudes of the difference signal (L-R) within the respective predetermined frequency bands. By way of example, the multi-band spectrum analyzer 17 includes a plurality of one octave wide bandpass filters respectively centered in the predetermined frequency bands and respectively having roll-offs of 6 dB per octave. The respective outputs of the bandpass filters are rectified and appropriately buffered to provide the control signals. The dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 is also responsive to the predetermined frequency bands and selectively cuts (attenuates) the difference signal frequencies in such predetermined frequency bands in response to the control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer 17. Specifically, the difference signal equalizer 19 attenuates the difference signal components within the respective predetermined frequency bands as a direct function of the respective control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer 17. That is, for a given frequency band, attenuation increases as the average amplitude of the difference signal (L-R) within such frequency band increases. The output of the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 is provided to a fixed difference signal equalizer 18 which attenuates selected frequencies of the dynamically equalized difference signal in a predetermined manner. An appropriate equalization characteristic for the fixed difference signal equalizer 18 is shown in FIG. 5A. By way of example, the fixed difference signal equalizer 18 may include a plurality of parallel filter stages including a low pass filter and a high pass filter having the following characteristics. The low pass filter has a -3 dB frequency of about 200 Hz, a roll-off of 6 dB per octave, and a gain of unity. The high pass filter has a -3 dB frequency of about 7 KHz, a roll-off of 6 dB per octave, and a gain of one-half. The fixed equalization of the fixed difference equalizer 18 is provided (a) so that frequencies to which the ear has greater sensitivity (about 1 KHz to about 4 KHz) are not inappropriately boosted, and (b) so that difference signal components having wavelengths comparable to the distance between the ears of a listener (the previously discussed "difference signal components of increased phase sensitivity") are not inappropriately boosted. Alternatively, such fixed equalization may be provided prior to dynamic equalization. The difference signal provided by the fixed difference signal equalizer 18 is amplified by a gain controlled amplifier 22 to provide a processed difference signal (L-R) p . The dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 is also responsive to the predetermined frequency bands and selectively boosts the sum signal frequencies in such predetermined frequency bands in response to the control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer 17. Specifically, the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 boosts the sum signal components within the respective predetermined frequency bands as a direct function of the respective control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer 17. That is, for a given frequency band, boost increases as the average amplitude of the difference signal (L-R) within such frequency band increases. The output of the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 is a processed sum signal (L+R) p . The predetermined frequency bands for the spectrum analyzer 17, the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19, and the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 include seven (7) bands of one octave width each which are respectively centered at 125 Hz, 250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1 KHz, 2 KHz, 4 KHz, and 8 KHz. A larger or smaller number of predetermined frequency bands may be readily utilized. The dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 provides for each of the frequency bands a maximum attenuation of 12 dB for the maximum level of the corresponding control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer 17. No attenuation would be provided for a control signal having a zero level. Similarly, the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 provides for each of the frequency bands a maximum boost of 6 dB for the maximum level of the corresponding control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer 17. No boost would be provided for a control signal having a zero level. The control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer 17 have a range between 0 volts and 8 volts. The corresponding range of attenuation provided by the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 would be between 0 dB and -12 dB, while the corresponding range of boost provided by the sum signal equalizer 21 would be between 0 dB and 6 dB. It should be readily apparent that for a given control signal for a particular frequency band, the value of the boost provided by the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 is one-half of the value of the attenuation provided by the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19. Other ratios may be utilized, but it is important that the level of boost provided by the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 be less than the corresponding level of attenuation provided by the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19. Such reduced boost has been found to be appropriate since most recordings include more sum signal than difference signal. A maximum boost level approaching the maximum attenuation level would result in inappropriately high levels of the processed sum signal (L+R) p . As discussed further herein, selected frequency bands of the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 and the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 are further responsive to other control signals. The foregoing discussion of the responses of such equalizers to the control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer were based on such other control signals having zero levels. To the extent that other control signals have non-zero levels, the total attenuation or boost is the superposition of the individual attenuation or boost due to the individual control signals. In other words, the respective control signals are added. It should be noted that preferably the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 is configured to provide for each of the frequency bands a maximum attenuation, such as 12 dB, in order to avoid inappropriate levels of attenuation. Similarly, the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 is preferably configured to provide for each of the frequency bands a maximum boost, such as 6 dB, in order to avoid inappropriately high levels of boost. The stereo image enhancement system 10 further includes a feedback and reverberation control circuit 30 which cooperates with other elements in the system to provide for automatic adjustment of the stereo image enhancement provided and for reverberation compensation. The characteristics of recordings that make automatic enhancement adjustment and reverberation compensation desirable are discussed further below. The control circuit 30 (described in more detail below relative to FIG. 3) is responsive to the difference signal (L-R) provided by the difference circuit 11 and the sum signal (L+R) provided by the sum circuit 13. The control circuit 30 provides a gain control signal CTRL for controlling the gain controlled amplifier 22 which varies the gain applied to the difference signal provided by the fixed difference signal equalizer 18. The control circuit 30 is further responsive to the processed difference signal (L-R) p provided by the gain controlled amplifier 22, thereby providing a closed loop system for controlling the processed difference signal (L-R) p . The control circuit 30 controls the gain of the gain controlled amplifier 22 to maintain a constant ratio between (1) the sum signal (L+R) provided by the summing circuit 13 and (2) the processed difference signal (L-R) p output of the gain controlled amplifier 22. By way of example, the gain controlled amplifier 22 may be an appropriate voltage controlled amplifier. The control circuit 30 further provides a reverberation control signal RCTRL to the difference signal equalizer 19 and the sum signal equalizer 21 for controlling the amount of equalization provided in the frequency bands centered at 500 Hz, 1 KHz, and 2 KHz (herein the "reverberation bands"). The presence of artificial reverberation, which is almost always in difference signal frequencies in the reverberation bands, is indicated by a larger than expected ratio between the sum signal and the difference signal, since a large ratio indicates the presence of a center stage soloist (vocalist or instrumentalist), which in turn indicates the possibility of artificial reverberation. The control circuit 30, therefore, monitors the ratio between the sum signal (L+R) and the difference signal (L-R). When the possible presence of artificial reverberation is detected (for example, when the sum signal to difference signal ratio is greater than a predetermined value), the reverberation control signal RCTRL provides further control of the reverberation bands in the difference signal equalizer 19 and the sum signal equalizer 21. As to the difference signal equalizer 19, the reverberation control signal RCTRL causes further attenuation in the above specified reverberation bands in addition to the attenuation resulting from the control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer 17. As to the sum signal equalizer 21, the reverberation control signal RCTRL causes further boost in the above specified reverberation bands in addition to the boost resulting from the control signals provided by the spectrum analyzer 17. The further attenuation of the difference signal components within the reverberation bands is to prevent any artificial reverberation which may be accompanying a soloist from being inappropriately boosted when the processed difference signal is subsequently amplified. The further boost of the sum signal components within the reverberation bands insures that the sum signal components in the reverberation bands are of sufficient level to compensate any artificial reverberation that is not sufficiently attenuated by the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19. The dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 provides for each of the above specified reverberation bands a maximum attenuation of 12 dB for the maximum level of the reverberation control signal RCTRL, with no corresponding control signal from the spectrum analyzer 17 present. The total attenuation provided in response to both the reverberation control signal RCTRL and a corresponding control signal from the spectrum analyzer 17 would be the superposition of the respective attenuations in response to the individual control signals. However, as noted previously, the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 is preferably configured to provide a predetermined maximum attenuation, such as 12 dB, regardless of the levels of the control signals. The dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 provides for each of the above specified reverberation bands a maximum boost of 6 dB for the maximum level of the reverberation control signal RCTRL, with no corresponding control signal from the spectrum analyzer 17 present. The total boost provided in response to both the reverberation control signal RCTRL and a corresponding control signal from the spectrum analyzer 17 would be the superposition of the respective boosts in response to the individual control signals. However, as noted previously, the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 is preferably configured to provide a predetermined maximum boost, such as 6 dB, regardless of the levels of the control signals. Alternatively, reverberation compensation for the processed sum signal may be achieved by utilizing a gain controlled amplifier (not shown) to vary the gain applied to the equalized sum signal provided by the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21. Such gain controlled amplifier would amplify the processed sum signal as a function of the reverberation control signal RCTRL. If a gain controlled amplifier to amplify the processed sum signal is utilized to compensate the effects of artificial reverberation, the reverberation control signal RCTRL would not be provided to the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21. The output of the gain controlled amplifier 22 is coupled to one fixed terminal of a potentiometer 23 which has its other fixed terminal coupled to ground. The wiper contact of the potentiometer 23 is coupled to a mixer 25 which therefore receives the processed difference signal (L-R) p having a level controlled by the gain controlled amplifier 22 and the potentiometer 23. As mentioned previously, the control circuit 30 and the gain controlled amplifier 22 control the ratio between the sum signal (L+R) provided by the summing circuit 13 and the processed difference signal (L-R) p provided by the gain controlled amplifier 22. As discussed further herein, that ratio is controlled by circuitry within the control circuit 30. The potentiometer 23 provides further control over the amount of stereo enhancement provided. The output of the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 is coupled to one fixed terminal of a potentiometer 27 which has its other fixed terminal coupled to ground. The wiper contact of the potentiometer 27 is coupled to the mixer 25 which therefore receives the processed sum signal (L+R) p having a level controlled by the potentiometer 27. The potentiometer 27 controls the level of the sound image at center stage. The left and right subsonically filtered input signals L in and R in are provided as further inputs to the mixer 25. The mixer 25 combines the processed sum signal (L+R) p and the processed difference signal (L-R) p with the left and right input signals L in and R in to provide left and right output signals L out and R out . Particularly, the left and right output signals L out and R out are provided by the mixer 25 in accordance with the following: L out = L in + K 1 (L+R) p + K 2 (L-R) p R out = R in + K 1 (L+R) p - K 2 (L-R) p The value of K 1 is controlled by the potentiometer 27; and the value of K 2 is controlled by the potentiometer 23. The overall effect of processing the difference signal (L-R) is that the quieter difference signal components are boosted relative to the louder difference signal components. That is, the selective attenuation of the difference signal followed by amplification provides a processed difference signal wherein the louder components may be comparable in level to their original levels while the quieter difference signal components have levels greater than their original levels. The processing of the sum signal (L+R) is to raise the level of the sum signal so that it is not overwhelmed by the selective boosting of difference signal components. The potentiometers 23, 27 are user controlled elements to allow the user to control the respective levels of the processed sum signal (L+R) p and the processed difference signal (L-R) p that are mixed by the mixer 25. For example, the potentiometers 23, 27 may be adjusted to minimize the processed difference signal and to maximize the processed sum signal. With such adjustment, the listener would hear primarily any center stage soloist present in the recording being played. The left and right output signals L out and R out are provided to the sound perspective correction system 200 of the stereo enhancement system 300 of FIG. 1. Alternatively, as discussed relative to the stereo enhancement system 300 of FIG. 1 and to the extent that the sound perspective correction system 200 is not utilized, the left and right output signals L out and R out are appropriately provided, for example, to the tape monitor loop input of the preamplifier tape monitor loop that provided the left and right stereo signals L and R. B. The Feedback and Reverberation Control Circuit Referring now to FIG. 3, shown therein is a block diagram of the feedback and reverberation control circuit 30 which includes a bandpass filter 32 that is responsive to the sum signal (L+R) and provides its output to an inverting peak detector 31. The output of the inverting peak detector 31 is an inverted sum signal envelope E s . Preferably, the bandpass filter 32 has a - 3 dB bandwidth of 4.8 KHz located between 200 Hz and 5KHz and a roll-off of 6 dB per octave. The bandpass filter 32 filters out the effects of clicks and pops that may be present in recordings, and further filters out high energy low frequency components which would have an undersirable effect on the control signals provided by the control circuit 30. The time constants of the peak detector circuit 31 provide a rise time in the order of one millisecond and a decay time in the order of one-half second. The feedback and reverberation control circuit 30 further includes a bandpass filter 34 that is responsive to the difference signal (L-R) and provides its output to a non-inverting peak detector 33. The output of the non-inverting peak detector 33 is a non-inverted difference signal envelope E d . The bandpass filter 34 has characteristics similar to those of the bandpass filter 32 and has a -3 dB bandwidth of 4.8 KHz located between 200 Hz and 5 KHz, and a roll-off of 6 dB per octave. The time constants of the peak detector circuit 33 provide a rise time in the order of one millisecond and a decay time in the order of one-half second. The feedback and reverberation control circuit 30 includes another bandpass filter 36 that is responsive to the processed difference signal (L-R) p and provides its output to a non-inverting peak detector 35. The output of the non-inverting peak letector 35 is a non-inverted processed difference signal envelope E dp . The bandpass filter 36 has characteristics similar to those of the bandpass filters 32, 34, and has a -3 dB passband of 4.8 KHz located between 200 Hz and 5 KHz and a roll-off of 6 dB per octave. The time constants of the peak detector 35 provide a rise time in the order of one millisecond and a decay time in the order of one-half second. The outputs of the inverting peak detector 31 and the non-inverting peak detector 33 are respectively coupled to the fixed contacts of a potentiometer 37. As discussed more fully further herein, the signal available at the wiper contact of the potentiometer 37 is coupled to an averaging circuit 60 which provides the reverberation control signal RCTRL. The output of the inverting peak detector 31 is further coupled to one fixed terminal of a potentiometer 39 which has its other fixed terminal coupled to ground. The inverted sum signal envelope E s provided at the wiper contact of the potentiometer 39 is coupled via a summing resistor 41 to the summing junction 43 of an integrator 50. The non-inverted processed difference signal envelope E dp provided by the non-inverting peak detector 35 is also coupled to the summing junction 43 via a summing resistor 45. The integrator 50 further includes an operational amplifier 47 which has its inverting input connected to the summing junction 43 and has its non-inverting input connected to ground. An integrating capacitor 49 is connected between the output of the operational amplifier 47 and the summing junction 43. A zener clamp diode 51 is coupled between the output of the operational amplifier and the summing junction 43, and the functions to limit the maximum level of the control signal CTRL provided by the operational amplifier 47. Further, the integrator 50 includes a zener diode 53 and a switch 55 serially coupled between the output of the operational amplifier 47 and the summing junction 43. The zener diode 53 has a value that is about in the middle of the output swing of the operational amplifier 47 as controlled by the zener clamp diode 51. The switch 55 is controlled by a difference signal detector 57 which is responsive to the difference signal envelope E d provided by the peak detector 33. Specifically, the difference signal detector 57 controls the switch 55 to close and clamp the level of the integrator output CTRL when little or no difference signal envelope E d is present. By way of example, the difference signal detector 57 may be a voltage comparator (or an operational amplifier biased as a voltage comparator) with an appropriate threshold reference near zero. The switched clamp circuit including the zener diode 53 and the switch 55 prevent a substantial increase in the gain provided by the gain controlled amplifier 22 when the left and right input signals L in and R in contain very little or no stereo information. Without such a switched clamp circuit, left and right input signals containing very little or no stereo information would cause the integrator output CTRL to go to its maximum level since very little or no processed difference signal would be present. Such maximum level of the control signal CTRL would cause the gain controlled amplifier 22 to provide maximum gain, and when the input signals L in and R in subsequently contain stereo information, the processed difference signal would be dramatically amplified to the detriment of the audio equipment and listeners' comfort. An alternative arrangement (not shown) of the switched clamp circuit 50 completely eliminates that one feedback path of amplifier 47 which includes zener diode 53 and switch 55. In such alternative arrangement, the switch 55 is connected between the summing junction 43 and the connection of the feedback path of capacitor 49, diode 51 to the inverting input to amplifier 47. The switch is still operated from the output of difference signal detector 57, which in this case, is connected to cause the switch to open when the difference signal detector 57 detects loss of the difference signal. Thus, with the loss of difference signal in such an alternative arrangement, the charge on integrating capacitor 49 remains frozen and, because the capacitor remains connected to the amplifier at all times, remains at the level existing upon the opening of the switch. Therefore the control signal from the output of amplifier 47 will not increase upon loss of the difference signal. The output of the integrator 50 is the gain control signal CTRL and is indicative of the sum of (a) the inverted sum signal envelope E s provided to the summing junction 43 and (b) the non-inverted processed difference signal envelope E dp provided to the summing junction 43. The gain control signal CTRL is utilized to vary the gain applied to the difference signal (L-R) by the gain controlled amplifier 22 (FIG. 1) so that the sum of the sum and processed difference signal envelopes E s , E dp applied to the summing resistors 41, 45 of the integrator 50 tends toward zero. Thus, the non-inverted processed difference signal envelope E dp provided to the summing junction 43 tends to inversely track or follow the inverted sum signal envelope E s provided to the summing junction 43. Stated another way, the processed difference signal (L-R) p is adjusted by the control signal CTRL in such a way that the non-inverted processed difference signal envelope E dp tends to be equal and opposite to the inverted sum signal envelope E s provided at the wiper contact of the potentiometer 39. Referring to FIG. 2, the control circuit 30 and the gain controlled amplifier 22 in essence cooperate to maintain a predetermined ratio between the sum signal (L+R) provided by the summing circuit 13 and the processed difference signal (L-R) p provided by the gain controlled amplifier 22. That predetermined ratio is set by the potentiometer 39 (FIG. 3). As mentioned earlier, the averaging circuit 60 is responsive to the signal at the wiper contact of the potentiometer 37. The signal at the wiper contact of the potentiometer 37 is the sum of the inverted sum signal envelope E s and the non-inverted difference signal envelope E d , where the amount contributed by each envelope to the sum of envelopes is determined by the position of the wiper contact. Since the sum signal envelope is inverted and the difference signal is non-inverted, the sum of envelopes will tend to go to zero if the sum and difference envelopes at the wiper contact are close to being equal and opposite. The averaging circuit 60 includes an operational amplifier 59 and an input resistor 61 coupled between the inverting input of the operational amplifier 59 and the wiper contact of the potentiometer 37. The non-inverting input of the operational amplifier 59 is connected to ground, and the output of the operational amplifier is the reverberation control signal RCTRL. A capacitor 63 and a resistor 65 are coupled in parallel between the output of the operational amplifier 59 and its inverting input. Effectively, the averaging circuit 60 is an integrator with a resistor coupled across the integrating capacitor. So long as the sum of envelopes signal at the wiper contact of the potentiometer 37 is near zero, the reverberation control signal provided by the averaging circuit 60 is near zero. When the contribution of the sum signal envelope to the sum of envelopes signal at the wiper contact becomes predominant, the level of the reverberation control signal RCTRL increases. The predominance of the contribution of the sum signal, as determined by the setting of the potentiometer 37, indicates the possible presence of a center stage soloist, which in turn indicates the possibility of artificial reverberation in the difference signal. In essence, the potentiometer 37 and the averaging circuit 60 cooperate to provide the reverberation control signal RCTRL when the ratio between (a) the inverted sum signal envelope E s and (b) the non-inverted difference signal envelope E d exceeds a predetermined value. That predetermined value is determined by the setting of the potentiometer 37. The reverberation control signal RCTRL is indicative of the amount by which that predetermined ratio is exceeded. The reverberation control signal RCTRL provided at the output of the averaging circuit 60 is utilized to provide further controls to the reverberation bands (referenced previously in regard to FIG. 2 and centered at 500 Hz, 1 KHz, and 2 KHz) of the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 and the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21. Specifically, the reverberation control signal RCTRL causes the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 to provide further attenuation in the reverberation bands and causes the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 to provide further boost in the reverberation bands. As mentioned previously, reverberation compensation of the processed sum signal may alternatively be achieved by selectively amplifying the output of the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 with a gain controlled amplifier (not shown) pursuant to control by the reverberation control signal RCTRL. Such an arrangement is illustrated in FIG. 10 and described in detail below. Since artificial reverberation is generally manifested in the difference signal components in the above-referenced reverberation bands, the further attenuation caused by the reverberation control signal RCTRL reduces the boost provided to any artificial reverberation that may be present. The further boost to the sum signal components in the reverberation bands is to compensate for any artificial reverberation which may not have been sufficiently attenuated by the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19. Preferably, the potentiometer 37 is adjusted so that the sum of envelopes signal at the wiper contact is at a null or slightly biased toward the difference signal for input stereo signals that do not include a soloist. It should be noted that the input to the averaging circuit 60 may alternatively be provided by other bandpass filter and peak detector circuitry, where each of such bandpass filters has a bandwidth which is more suitable to the detection of the possibility of the presence of reverberation. In the foregoing stereo image enhancement system 10, automatic enhancement adjustment and reverberation compensation have been provided for the following reasons. It has been determined that the amount of stereo information present in recordings varies considerably from recording to recording. For example, one recording may be close to being monaural while another may have "ping-pong" stereo where a sound source appears to move from side-to-side. As a result of the recording to recording variation in stereo information, and also such variation within a single recording, continual adjustment of the amount of enhancement may be required, and such adjustment is automatically and continually provided by the control circuit 30 and the gain controlled amplifier 22. It has also been determined that recordings may include artificial acoustical or electronic reverberation, for example, for soloists featured at center stage. Such artificial reverberation is generally manifested in the difference signal (L-R). Analysis of a variety of recordings revealed that the primary energy of artificial reverberation is in the range between 250 Hz and 2500 Hz, particularly as to male and female vocalists. Such artificial reverberation may be a function of one or more of the vocal formants, possibly the first and/or second. See "The Acoustics of the Singing Voice," J. Sundberg, 1977, The Physics of Music , Scientific American, W.H. Freeman & Company. When the processed difference signal (L-R) p is increased for greater stereo enhancement, any artificial reverberation that may be present is also increased and may under some circumstances overwhelm the processed sum signal (L+R) p . The presence of artificial reverberation is compensated by the control circuit 30 in cooperation with the selected reverberation bands of the difference signal equalizer 19 and the sum signal equalizer 21. In the foregoing stereo image enhancement system 10, the sum signal equalizer 21 and the difference signal equalizer 19 are dynamically controlled by the spectrum analyzer 17, and in that sense the system is referred to as the dynamic stereo image enhancement system 10. Alternatively, a simplified non-dynamic equalization or fixed equalization stereo image enhancement system may be provided which does not include the spectrum analyzer 17 and which provides for fixed equalization of the sum and difference signals. C. The Fixed Stereo Image Enhancement System Referring particularly to FIG. 4, shown therein is a block diagram of a statistical or fixed stereo image enhancement system 110 which includes a left input signal subsonic filter 112 and a right input signal subsonic filter 114 which are responsive to left and right stereo signals L and R provided by a stereo sound reproduction system (not shown). For example, as discussed above relative to the stereo enhancement system 300 of FIG. 1, the left and right stereo signals L and R may be provided by a preamplifier tape monitor loop output. The subsonic filters 112, 114 provide subsonically filtered input signals L in and R in to a summing circuit 111 and a difference circuit 113. As discussed above relative to the dynamic stereo image enhancement system of FIG. 2, the subsonic filters 112, 114 afford protection against damage due to dropping a phono cartridge. The difference circuit 111 subtracts the right signal R in from the left signal L in to provide a difference signal (L-R), and the summing circuit 113 adds the subsonically filtered left and right input signals L in and R in to provide a sum signal (L+R). The difference signal (L-R) provided by the difference circuit 111 is provided to a fixed difference signal equalizer 115 which selectively attenuates the difference signal as a function of frequency. The fixed difference signal equalizer 115 is substantially similar to the fixed difference signal equalizer 18 of the dynamic stereo image enhancement system 10 of FIG. 2, and an appropriate equalization characteristic is shown in FIG. 5A. By way of example, the fixed difference signal equalizer 115 may include a plurality of parallel filter stages including a low pass filter and a high pass filter having the following characteristics. The low pass filter has a -3 dB frequency of about 200 Hz, a roll-off of 6 dB per octave, and a gain of unity. The high pass filter has a -3 dB frequency of about 7 KHz, a roll-off of 6 dB per octave, and a gain of one-half. As discussed further herein, further amplification for the equalized difference signal output of the fixed difference equalizer 115 is provided by a gain controlled amplifier 125. Such amplification may also be provided, at least in part, by the fixed difference signal equalizer 115. The output of the gain controlled amplifier 125 is coupled to a reverberation filter 129 which provides a processed difference signal (L-R) p as its output. Referring again to FIG. 5A, it should be noted that the difference signal is particularly attenuated in the range of about 1 KHz to about 4 KHz since the human ear has greater sensitivity to such frequencies and since such frequency range includes difference signal components having wavelengths that are comparable to the distance between a listener's ears (the "frequencies of increased phase sensitivity"). As discussed previously and relative to the prior art, loud difference signals within such frequencies result in annoying harshness and limit a listener to being located equidistant between the speakers. By attenuating such frequencies, the harshness and the limitation on location are substantially reduced. The sum signal (L+R) provided by the summing circuit 113 is coupled to a fixed sum signal equalizer 117. An appropriate equalization characteristic for the fixed sum signal equalizer 117 is shown in FIG. 5B. By way of example, the fixed sum signal equalizer 117 includes a bandpass filter which has -3 dB frequencies at 200 Hz and 7 KHz and rolls off at 6 dB per octave. The 200 Hz to 7 KHz bandwidth of the bandpass filter approximates the operating range of the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 of the dynamic stereo image enhancement system 10 of FIG. 2. It should be noted that the equalization characteristic of the fixed sum signal equalizer 117 rolls off below 200 Hz at 6 dB per octave to avoid overly emphasized bass. Moreover, there is very little difference signal in that range, so that the processed sum signal in that range does not have to be boosted very much. As discussed further herein, further amplification of the processed sum signal (L+R) p is provided by a gain controlled amplifier 127 which also provides for artificial reverberation compensation. Such amplification may also be provided, at least in part, by the fixed sum signal equalizer 117. The equalization characteristics of the fixed equalizers 115, 117 and the gains associated with the processed sum and difference signals are intended to approximate the average behavior of the dynamic enhancement system 10 of FIG. 1 for a large variety of recordings. Thus, the difference signal components in the frequency ranges that statistically include predominantly quiet components are boosted relative to the difference signal components in the frequency ranges that statistically include predominantly louder components. The louder components of the difference signal are typically in the mid-range, and the quieter components are on either side of the mid-range. Particularly, the difference signal components in the mid-range are attenuated to a greater degree than the difference signal components on either side of the mid-range. The equalized signal is then boosted so that the difference signal components on either side of the mid-range are boosted relative to the difference signal components in the mid-range. The enhancement system 110 further includes a feedback and reverberation control circuit 40 which is substantially similar to the feedback and reverberation control circuit 30 of FIG. 3. The control circuit 40 cooperates with other elements in the system to provide for automatic adjustment of stereo enhancement and for reverberation compensation. The control circuit 40 is responsive to the difference signal (L-R) provided by the difference circuit 111 and the sum signal (L+R) provided by the summing circuit 113. The control circuit 40 provides a gain control signal CTRL for controlling the gain controlled amplifier 125 which varies the gain applied to the equalized difference signal provided by the fixed difference signal equalizer 115. The control circuit 40 is further responsive to the amplified difference signal provided by the gain controlled amplifier 125. Particularly, the output of the gain controlled amplifier 125 would be provided to the bandpass filter 36 of the control circuit 30 of FIG. 3. The control circuit 40 controls the gain controlled amplifier 125 so as to maintain a constant ratio between the sum signal (L+R) provided by the summing circuit 111 and the difference signal provided by the gain controlled amplifier 125. The control circuit 40 further provides a reverberation control signal RCTRL to the gain controlled amplifier 127 which provides for reverberation compensation. By way of example, the gain controlled amplifier 127 may be an appropriate voltage controlled amplifier. The reverberation filter 129 is a variable rejection filter that includes two one octave wide filters respectively centered at 500 Hz and 1.5 KHz, and each having a low Q to provide sufficient bandwidth. Each of the filters of the reverberation filter 129 may be similar to one of the equalizer bands in the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 of the dynamic stereo image enhancement system 10 of FIG. 2, and provides a maximum attenuation of 12 dB for the maximum level of the reverberation control signal RCTRL. An alternative reverberation filter is shown in FIG. 11 and described below. By way of example, the gain controlled amplifier 125 may be an appropriate voltage controlled amplifier. The processed sum signal (L+R) p output of the gain controlled amplifier 127 is provided to a fixed terminal of a potentiometer 123 which has its other fixed terminal coupled to ground. The wiper contact of the potentiometer 123 is coupled to a mixer 121 which therefore receives the processed sum signal (L+R) p having a level controlled by the potentiometer 123. The processed difference signal (L-R) p output of the reverberation filter 129 is coupled to a fixed terminal of a potentiometer 119 which has its other fixed terminal coupled to ground. The wiper contact of the potentiometer meter 121 119 is coupled to the which therefore receives the processed difference signal (L-R) p having a level controlled by the potentiometer 119. The gain controlled amplifier 127 and the reverberation filter 129 are preferably controlled by the reverberation control signal RCTRL so that the resulting increase in the processed sum signal (L+R) provided by the gain controlled amplifier 127 is less than the decrease in the processed difference signal (L-R) p provided by the reverberation filter 129. Increasing the level of the processed sum signal (L+R) p provided by the gain controlled amplifier 127 is to provide for a sufficient level of the processed sum signal (L+R) p to compensate for any artificial reverberation not sufficiently attenuated by the reverberation filter 129. The left and right subsonically filtered input signals L in and R in are provided as further inputs to the mixer 121. The mixer 121 combines the processed difference signal (L-R) p and the processed sum signal (L+R) p with the left and right input signals L in and R in to provide left and right output signals L out and R out . The mixer 121 may be similar to the mixer 25 of the dynamic stereo enhancement system 10 of FIG. 1, and would provide the left and right output signals L out , R out in accordance with the following: L out = L in + K 1 (L+R) p + K 2 (L-R) p R out = R in + K 1 (L+R) p - K 2 (L-R) p The value of K 1 is controlled by the potentiometer 123; and the value of K 2 is controlled by the potentiometer 119. The potentiometers 119, 123 are user controlled elements to allow the user to control the levels of the processed difference signal (L-R) p and the processed sum signal (L+R) p that are mixed by the mixer 121. For example, the potentiometers 119, 123 may be adjusted to minimize the processed difference signal and to maximize the processed sum signal. With such adjustment, the listener would hear primarily any center stage soloist present in the recording being played. The left and right output signals Lout and Rout are provided to the sound perspective correction system 200 of the stereo enhancement system 300 of FIG. 1 Alternatively, as discussed relative to FIG. 1, to the extent that the sound perspective correction system 200 is not utilized, the left and right output signals L out and R out are appropriately provided, for example, to the tape monitor loop input of the preamplifier that provided the left and right stereo signals L and R. As previously mentioned, principles of the present invention are applicable either for playback of conventional stereo sound recordings or for the manufacture of unique stereo sound recordings which will provide advantages described above when played back through conventional sound responsive systems. Thus, as illustrated in Fig. 8, for playback of a conventional sound recording, an exemplary system having the enhancement described herein includes a conventional playback apparatus 300 which may respond to a digital record, such as a laser disc, a phonograph record, a magnetic tape, or the sound channel on video tape or motion picture film. The playback apparatus provides left and right channel stereo signals L,R to a preamplifier 302 from which the left and right signals are fed to the stereo image enhancement system 100 described above to provide processed output signals L out and R out fed either directly to a pair of conventional loudspeakers 304, 306 or fed to the speakers via the perspective correction system 200 previously described. A similar arrangement is used in making a recording that will itself bear data in the form of physical grooves of a phonograph record, magnetic domains of a magnetic tape or like medium, or digital information that may be read by optical means. Such data defines left and right stereo signals formed of signal components that, when played back on a conventional sound reproducing system, produce all of the advantages described above. Thus, as illustrated schematically in Fig. 9, a recording system for making a sound recording embodying principles of the present invention may receive left and right stereo input signals from either a pair of microphones 310 or a conventional stereo playback system 312 which is adapted to provide left and right stereo input signals L,R. The playback system 312, like the system 300 of Fig. 8, may provide its output signals from any conventional record medium including digital records such as a laser disc, phonograph records, magnetic tape, or video or film sound track media. Ganged switches 314, 316 schematically indicate in FIG. 9 that the system may use either left and right signals from a playback device or the left and right signals from a pair of microphones. These signals are fed to a preamplifier 318 and thence to the stereo image enhancement circuit 100 described above. From the stereo image enhancement circuit 100, the processed left and right output signals are fed either directly to a recording device 320 or indirectly to the recording device via the above described perspective correction circuit 200. The recording device conventionally records the left and right output signals L out and R out on a record medium 322 which may be any one of the record medium types commonly employed. It will be noted that the output signals L out and R out that are fed to recording device 320 are derived, in the case of the stereo image enhancement, from mixer 25 of Fig. 2 or mixer 21 of Fig. 4, or in the case of the perspective correction from the mixer 225 of Fig. 6. The output signal L out recorded on the medium 322 includes the several left channel output signal components described, namely the described combination of L in + K 1 (L+R) p + K 2 (L-R) p for the left channel output. Similarly, the output signal R out is recorded upon the record medium by the recording apparatus and includes the components described above as R in + K 1 (L+R) p - K 2 (L-R) p . The record medium 322, when recorded with the arrangement illustrated in Fig. 9, is simply played back on a conventional sound recording responsive device to provide the above-described advantages. These advantages are derived from the fact that the record medium so produced embodies signal-producing means that cooperates with the sound recording responsive device to produce left and right output signals that comprise a combination of signal components including a processed difference signal and a processed sum signal. The processed difference signal is a modification of an input difference signal formed in the stereo image enhancement circuit 100. This input difference signal represents the difference of the left and right input signals L and R, and as previously described, has relative amplitudes of certain components modified to boost those of its components that are within frequency bands wherein the input difference signal has lowest amplitude relative to those components of such input difference signal that are within frequency bands wherein the input difference signal components have highest amplitude. Similarly, the recording will produce a right stereo output signal component as a processed sum signal formed in the stereo image enhancement circuit 100. This processed sum signal component is a modification of the sum of the left and right channel input signals, and, as previously described, has relative amplitudes of certain components modified to boost those of its components in frequency bands where the input difference signal has higher amplitudes relative to those components of the input sum signal that are within frequency bands where the difference signal has lower amplitude. Thus, the record cooperates with the sound responsive system to cause the speakers to produce left and right stereo signals each having sum and difference components wherein amplitudes of such components are relatively attenuated or boosted, respectively, within those frequency bands wherein the difference signal has lower amplitudes. Moreover, the operation of the gain control amplifier 22 and control circuit 30 of Fig. 2, and the corresponding circuits of Fig. 4 cause the stereo output signals produced by playback of record 322 to have a substantially constant ratio of the sum signal to the modified or processed difference signal, all as previously described. When the system of Fig. 9 is employed to make a record having perspective correction in addition to or instead of image enhancement, such a record will cooperate with the conventional stereo player to produce left and right stereo output signals having components including a processed sum signal which are increasingly attenuated in frequency bands centered on 500 Hz, 1 KHz and 8 KHz, respectively, as described above, and a component comprising a difference signal. Such a record is made specifically to be played back through a system including side mounted speakers. Where a perspective corrected record made with the system of FIG. 9 is specifically made for playback in a system with front mounted speakers, the record when played back on a stereo player will provide left and right stereo output signals wherein one output signal has components comprising a sum signal and a component comprising a difference signal, where such difference signal has amplitudes thereof increasingly boosted in frequency bands centered respectively at 500 Hz, 1 KHz and 8 KHz, as described above. Stated otherwise, the recording having perspective correction for front speakers, when played in a stereo player, produces a left output signal which is formed of the sum of a first component comprising the sum signal and a second component comprising the processed difference signal as set forth in equation 5 above and will provide a right output stereo signal formed of the difference between the sum signal and the processed difference signal as set forth in equation 6 above. When such a recording is made for use with side mounted speakers, only the sum signals in equations 5 and 6 are equalized whereas when the recording is made for use with front mounted speakers only the difference signals of equations of 5 and 6 are equalized. It will be seen that a method of making unique stereo sound recordings having stereo image enhancement, or perspective correction, or both may be carried out by the apparatus illustrated in Fig. 9. The method generally comprises combining left and right input signals to generate sum and difference signals, and creating a processed sum signal by selectively altering relative amplitudes of components of the sum signal within respective predetermined frequency bands so as to boost those of the sum signal components which are within frequency bands of highest difference signal component amplitudes relative to those of the sum signal components which are within frequency bands of lowest difference signal component amplitudes. The method also includes the step of creating a processed difference signal by selectively alterating the relative amplitude of components of the difference signal within the predetermined frequency bands so as to attenuate those of the difference signal components which are within frequency bands where difference signal components are highest relative to those of the difference signal components which are within frequency bands wherein the difference signal components are lowest. The method also combines the left and right signals with the processed sum and difference signals to provide enhanced right and left output signals which are fed to a sound recording device to make a sound recording. Other features of the method include the described electronic analysis of the frequency spectrum of the difference signal and generation of control signals as a function of the amplitudes of the difference signal within respective predetermined frequency bands, and utilizing the control signals to determine the extent to which amplitudes of components of the sum and difference signals are altered within the respective frequency bands. According to an important aspect of the method described herein, right and left signals are added and subtracted to generate sum and difference signals, a dynamic control signal is generated representing the amount of stereo in the input signals, the sum and difference signals are processed for enhancement of the output signals and at least one of the processed signals is modified in accordance with the amount of stereo in the input signals. A specific feature of this aspect of the method involves modification of one of the processed signals, which is accomplished so as to maintain a constant ratio between one of the sum and difference signals and the processed signal. In use of the described method, for making a recording that is corrected for perspective with side mounted speakers, left and right signals are combined to provide sum and difference signals, the sum signal is equalized as previously described and combined with the unprocessed difference signal to provide a left output formed of the sum of the processed sum signal and the unprocessed difference signal and to form a right output signal comprising the difference between the processed sum signal and the unprocessed difference signal. These output signals are fed to the recording mechanism to provide a record medium having perspective correction for side mounted speakers. For front mounted speakers, a perspective corrected record medium is made by combining the right and left input signals to provide sum and difference signals, equalizing the difference signal as previously described, and combining the unprocessed sum signal with the equalized difference signal to provide a left output formed of the sum of the unprocessed sum signal and the processed or equalized difference signal and to provide a right output signal formed of the difference between the unprocessed sum signal and the equalized difference signal. These output signals are fed to a recording mechanism to produce a record medium having perspective correction for front speakers. A record made by the apparatus and method described herein is uniquely distinguished from other stereo records in that unique signal generating data is embodied in the record. Whether such data is in the form of variable magnetic elements, varying grooves of a phonograph record or digital information such as variations in optical reflectivity of a laser or digital disc, for example, the unique aspects of such a record medium are readily recognizable. Upon playback of such an unique record by conventional record playing medium, stereo sound will be produced having all of the above-described advantages and composed of the specified signal components. The amount of enhancement is continually and automatically adjusted by control circuit 30 and gain controlled amplifier 22 to compensate for variation in the amount of stereo information from one recording to another when using the described system for playback of conventional recordings. So too, such continuous and automatic adjustment is embodied in a recording made as indicated in Fig. 9. Thus, if the stereo information contained in a record employed in the playback system 312, or, if the stereo information reaching the microphone pair 310, should vary either from one recording to the next or should vary during any given performance or recording, the described control circuit 30 and gain control amplifier 22 will result in adjustment of the amount of enhancement in the information recorded on the record medium 322 and, therefore, result in such adjustment of output signals when record medium 322 is played back in a conventional system. As described above and illustrated in FIG. 4, where fixed sum and difference equalizers are employed, amplitude of the processed sum channel signal is boosted, and certain frequencies of the processed difference signal are attenuated under control of the reverberation control signal RCTRL. This arrangement provides automatic control of the amount of reverberation by automatically increasing the level of the processed sum channel signal and concomitantly decreasing the level of certain frequencies of the difference channel signal. These increases and decreases in signal levels are effected in the reverberation bands, as described above, to reduce boost of natural or artificial reverberation that may be present, which boosts is provided by the enhancement circuits described herein. A similar reverberation control is also described above in connection with the arrangement illustrated in FIG. 2, in which the reverberation control signal is employed to cause the dynamic difference signal equalizer 19 to provide further attenuation in the reverberation bands and to cause the dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 to provide further boost to the sum signal components. Reverberation control illustrated in FIG. 2 may be considerably improved by providing an automatic reverberation control through the use of a gain controlled amplifier in the sum channel and an attenuating reverberation filter in the difference channel. Such an improved arrangement is illustrated in FIG. 10, which shows a system substantially similar to that illustrated in FIG. 2, having many of the same components. Components which are the same in both FIGS. 2 and 10 are designated by the same reference numerals with the corresponding components of FIG. 10 having the prefix "4" so that for example, summing circuit 13 of FIG. 2 is the same as summing circuit 413 of FIG. 10. The arrangement of FIG. 10 differs from that of FIG. 2 generally by providing an automatically and manually controllable reverberation control signal, which is employed to control a gain controlled sum channel amplifier 440, and the addition of a reverberation signal controlled reverberation filter 429 (analogous to reverberation filter 129 of the fixed equalizer arrangement of FIG. 4) to handle the processed difference signal. In the circuit of FIG. 10 the tendency of the described enhancement circuits to provide excessive emphasis of reverberation in the inputs is automatically and selectively restrained. Control circuit 430 is identical to the control circuit illustrated in FIG. 3 but the reverberation signal, RCTRL, provided from this circuit is derived from the manually adjustable wiper arm 442 of a reverberation control potentiometer 444, to which is fed the reverberation control signal from the output of amplifier 59 of FIG. 3. The reverberation control signal from wiper 442 is fed to control the gain of the gain controlled amplifier 440 to which is fed the output (L + R) p of dynamic sum signal equalizer 421. The output of gain controlled amplifier 440 is fed to a potentiometer 427 for input to the mixer 425, just as described in connection with the output of dynamic sum signal equalizer 21 of FIG. 2. In this case the reverberation control signal is not fed to the dynamic difference signal equalizer nor to the dynamic sum signal equalizer directly. The processed difference signal from the output of gain controlled amplifier 422 is fed to the input of a reverberation filter 429 of which the output is fed to potentiometer 423 and thence to mixer 425 just as described in connection with the output of the gain controlled amplifier 22 of FIG. 2. The reverberation filter 429 may be the same as reverberation filter 129 illustrated in FIG. 4. However, it is presently preferred to employ a reverberation filter arranged as illustrated in FIG. 11, which is basically a variable attenuation band reject filter. As illustrated in FIG. 11, the processed difference signal (L-R) p is fed to the filter input and thence in parallel to a lowpass filter 450, a highpass filter 452, and a bandpass filter 454. The output of the bandpass filter 454 is fed to a controlled attenuating circuit 456 having the reverberation control RCTRL as its controlling input. The three outputs, from filters 450 and 452 and from the attenuator 456, are combined and fed to the inverting input of a differential amplifier 458 having its noninverting input grounded, thus providing at its output 450 the gain controlled and reverberation filter controlled processed difference signal to be fed to the potentiometer 423. The filter sections of the reverberation filter 429 collectively provide a lowpass up to about 250 hertz, a highpass above about 4 kilohertz, and a controlled attenuation bandpass between about 400 hertz and 2.5 kilohertz. Therefore, in a manner similar to the operation of the fixed equalization arrangement of FIG. 4, the circuit of FIG. 10 provides for sensing of the amount of reverberation, whether natural or artificial, in the input signals and provides a reverberation control signal RCTRL based upon such sensed reverberation. The control signal RCTRL boosts the processed sum signal and attenuates a frequency band of the processed difference signal so as to automatically control the effect of the described enhancement system on the amount of reverberation in the input signal. The automatic control of reverberation is manually selectable by manual control of the potentiometer 444, a feature that is of great importance in the recording industry. Close selective adjustment of the amount of reverberation is required in making a recording, and in particular in making a new or re-recording of an old recording. Thus any undesired enhancement of reverberation that may be introduced by the described enhancement circuitry is readily avoided by the automatic control of both sum and difference channels and by the manually selectable control of the level of the reverberation control signal itself. Of course the manual control of the level of the reverberation control signal as illustrated in FIG. 10 may be readily applied to obtain manual control of the level of the reverberation control signal RCTRL shown in the circuit of FIG. 4, which is fed to control the reverberation filter 129. Overall, the foregoing has been a disclosure of systems for substantially improving the stereo image resulting from recorded performances, both in playback of conventional records and in the production of improved recordings. Such systems are readily utilized with standard audio equipment and are readily added to installed audio equipment. Further, the disclosed systems may be easily incorporated into preamplifiers and/or integrated amplifiers. Such incorporation may include provisions for bypassing the disclosed systems. The disclosed stereo enhancement system is readily implemented using analog techniques, digital techniques, or a combination of both. Further, the disclosed stereo enhancement system is readily implemented with integrated circuit techniques. Also, the disclosed systems may be utilized with or incorporated into a variety of audio systems including airline entertainment systems, theater sound systems, recording systems for producing recordings which include image enhancement and/or perspective correction, and electronic musical instruments such as organs and synthesizers. Further, the disclosed systems would be particularly useful in automotive sound systems, as well as sound systems for other vehicles such as boats. It will of course be understood that the present invention has been described above purely by way of example, and modifications of detail can be made within the scope of the invention.

Claims: A system for enhancing left and right input signals provided from a source of stereo sound comprising: means for combining (11, 13) the left and right input signals to generate a difference signal representing the difference between the left and right input signals, and a sum signal representing the sum of the left and right signals; stereo enhancement means (19, 115) for altering the amplitudes of selected frequency components of said difference signal to create a processed difference signal; characterised in that the system also comprises: control means (30, 40) responsive to the relative amplitude levels of the sum and difference signals for generating a control signal indicative of the amount of reverberation existing in the input signals, wherein amplitude levels of said selected frequency components of said difference signal are altered in response to the amplitude level of said control signal; and means for combining (25, 121) said processed difference signal with said left and right input signals to provide left and right output signals. The system of claim 1 wherein said control signal is connected to said stereo enhancement means and wherein said stereo enhancement means alters the amplitudes of selected frequency components of said difference signal in response to the level of said control signal. The system of claim 1 further comprising a reverberation filter (129) receiving said processed difference signal for filtering said processed difference signal by a variable amount, said control signal connected to said reverberation filter for adjusting said variable amount. The system of claim 3 wherein said reverberation filter attenuates said processed difference signal by an increasing amount in response to an increase in the amount of reverberation existing in the input signals. The system of claim 4 wherein said reverberation filter is a variable rejection filter which comprises two band-rejection filters centered at approximately 500 Hz and 1500 Hz. The system of claim 1 wherein the level of said sum signal is varied in response to said control signal to compensate for the presence of reverberation in said input signals. The system of claim 6 further comprising a gain controlled amplifier (127) receiving said sum signal and amplifying said sum signal to provide a processed sum signal, said gain controlled amplifier responsive to said control signal for boosting amplitude levels of said processed sum signal to compensate for the effects of reverberation, said processed sum signal combined with said left and right input signals and said processed difference signal to provide said left and right output signals. The system of claim 6 further comprising means (21, 117) for altering the amplitudes of selected frequency components of said sum signal to create a processed sum signal, wherein said means for altering is responsive to the level of said control signal, and wherein said processed sum signal is combined with said left and right input signals and said processed difference signal to provide said left and right output signals. The system of claim 1 wherein said control means comprises means for monitoring (31, 33, 37, 60) the level of said sum signal relative to the level of said difference signal to detect conditions indicative of the presence of artificial reverberation. The system of claim 1 wherein said stereo enhancement means comprises a fixed equalizer (115) for attenuating selected frequencies of the difference signal for which the human ear has greater sensitivity relative to the remaining frequencies of the difference signal. The system of claim 1 wherein said stereo enhancement means comprises a dynamic equalizer (19) for boosting selected frequency components of said difference signal as a function of the amplitude levels of said difference signal components. A method of enhancing left and right input signals provided from a source of stereo sound comprising: combining (11, 13) the left and right input signals to generate a difference signal representing the difference between the left and right input signals, and a sum signal representing the sum of the left and right signals; electronically processing (19, 115) amplitude levels of selected frequency components of said difference signal to create a processed difference signal; characterised in that the method includes: generating a control signal (30, 40) responsive to the relative amplitude levels of the sum and difference signals wherein said control signal is indicative of the amount of reverberation existing in the input signals; adjusting said electronic processing of said difference signal in response to the amplitude level of said control signal; and combining (25, 121) said processed difference signal with said left and right input signals to provide left and right output signals. The method of claim 12 wherein said amplitude levels of said selected frequency components of said difference signal are attenuated in response to an increasing level of said control signal. The method of claim 12 further comprising the step of filtering the processed difference signal by a variable amount, said variable amount determined by the level of said control signal. The method of claim 14 wherein said step of filtering the processed difference signal by a variable amount comprises the step of attenuating said processed difference signal by an increasing amount in response to an increase in the amount of reverberation existing in the input signals. The method of claim 15 wherein the step of filtering the processed difference signal by a variable amount comprises the step of applying a variable rejection filter having two band-rejection filters centered at approximately 500 Hz and 1500 Hz. The method of claim 12 further comprising the step of varying the level of said sum signal in response to said control signal to compensate for the presence of reverberation in said input signals. The method of claim 17 wherein the step varying the level of the said sum signal comprises the step of amplifying said sum singal to provide a processed sum signal and controlling the amount of amplification of said sum signal in response to said control signal to compensate for the effects of reverberation. The method of claim 12 further comprising the step of altering the amplitudes of selected frequency components of said sum signal in response to the level of said control signal. The method of claim 12 wherein said step of generating a control signal comprises the steps of monitoring an amplitude envelope for each of the sum and difference signals, generating a comparison signal indicating the relative amplitude-envelope levels of the sum and difference signals, and averaging the level of said comparison signal to generate said control signal. The method of claim 12 wherein said step of altering the amplitudes of selected frequency components of said difference signal comprises the step of attenuating the difference signal components for which the human ear has greater sensitivity relative to the remaining frequencies of the difference signal. The method of claim 12 wherein said step of altering the amplitudes of selected frequency components of said difference signal comprises the step of dynamically equalizing the selected frequency components of said difference signal as a function of the amplitude levels of said selected frequency components.

Inventors: KLAYMAN ARNOLD I, KLAYMAN, ARNOLD I.
Applicants: SRS LABS INC, SRS LABS, INC.
Application year: 1987
Main classification: H04S1
IPC codes: H04S1