DYNAMIC MEMBRANES

Abstract: A method of preparing a semi-permeable membrane 79 suitable for reverse osmosis includes contacting a porous artifact 78 with an hydrated metal oxide, to form an hydrated metal oxide coated artifact. Thereafter the hydrated metal oxide coated artifact is contacted with at least one polyelectrolyte selected from the group listed in Claim 1, thereby to form a polyelectrolyte layer in or on the hydrated metal oxide layer.

Description: This invention relates to semipermeable membranes. It relates in particular to a method of preparing a semi-permeable membrane. Reverse osmosis is a pressure-driven membrane permeation process for separating a relatively pure solvent from a less pure solution. The solution is contacted with one surface of a semi-permeable membrane at a pressure greater than the osmotic pressure of the solution, and relatively pure solvent passes through the membrane. US3926799 describes a support for a dynamic membrane. The support is formed by applying to a porous substrate a layer of an aqueous slurry of ZrO₂ as a filter aid, followed by drying and firing to evaporate the water and form a layer of ZrO₂ integral with the surface of the substrate. This support can then be used to form a dynamic membrane for use in water desalination by coating it with polyacrylic acid. It discusses also US 3577339 which apparently teaches the use of a filter aid on a porous support to obtain the narrow range of pore sizes required for dynamic membrane formation. It also teaches that tubes which do not require a filter aid such as ZrO₂ must be made from carefully controlled particle size raw materials to obtain the correct pore size in the final product, with the resultant product tending to be prohibitively expensive for large installations. It also teaches that it is known to add the filter aid as a suspension in the feed to the hyperfiltration loop, but mentions that this is time consuming and that special equipment is required therefor. Furthermore, should the dynamic membrane thus formed become foul and it replaced, the filter aid is then of necessity also replaced. According to the invention, there is provided a method of preparing a semi-permeable membrane suitable for reverse osmosis, a porous artifact is contacted with an hydrated metal oxide, to form an hydrated metal oxide coated artifact; and the hydrated metal oxide coated artifact contacted with at least one polyelectrolyte, thereby to form a polyelectrolyte layer in or on the hydrated metal oxide layer, wherein the polyelectrolyte layer comprises or consists of a polymer which has carboxylic acid functional groups as well as functional groups other than carboxylic acid groups, and which is selected from the group consisting in (i) poly (CH₂=C(Y₂)(COOH))-co-(CH₂=C(Y₃)(Y₄)) wherein (a) when Y₂ is -H and Y₃ is -H, Y₄ is -OCH₃, -OC(O)CH₃ or -OH; (b) when Y₂ is -halogen and Y₃ is -H, Y₄ is -OCH₃, -OC(O)CH₃ or -OH; (c) when Y₂ is -OCH₃ and Y₃ is -H, Y₄ is -OC(O)CH₃, -OH or -OCH₃; (d) when Y₂ is -OH and Y₃ is -H, Y₄ is -OCH₃, -OC(O)CH₃ or -OH; (ii) poly (CH₂=CH COOH)-co-(CH₂=CH-OH)-co-(CH₂=CH-(Y₈)) where Y₈ is -O-C(O)-(Y₉), Y₉ is -CH₃ or -(CH₂) n CH₃, n = 1 to 3 or Y₈ is -C(O)-O-(Y₁₀), Y₁₀ is -CH₃ or -(CH₂) n CH₃, n = 1 to 3 or Y₈ is -C(O)-CH₃ or Y₈ is -O-CH₃; (iii) the alkali metal salts or partial salts of the above polyacids. Hence, the coated artifact has a side coated and/or a plurality of pores filled with the hydrated metal oxide. The metal of the hydrated metal oxide may be selected from the group consisting in zirconium, aluminium and iron. The polyelectrolyte may have a molecular mass of 20 000 to 500 000 and may be selected from the group consisting in: (1) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (2) poly (2-chloro acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (3) poly (2-hydroxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (4) poly (acrylic acid-co-methyl vinyl ether) (5) poly (2-chloro acrylic acid-co-methyl vinyl ether) (6) poly (2-chloro acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (7) poly (2-methoxy acrylic acid-co-methyl vinyl ether) (8) poly (2-methoxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (9) poly (2-methoxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (10) poly (2-hydroxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl methyl ether) (11) poly (2-hydroxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (12) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (13) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl acetate) (14) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl ethanoate) (15) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl propionate) (16) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl butyrate) (17) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-methyl acrylate) (18) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-ethyl acrylate) (19) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-propyl acrylate) (20) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-butyl acrylate) (21) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl methyl ether) (22) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl methyl ketone) The artifact may comprise a porous membrane or a porous tube. When it is a porous membrane, the porous membrane may comprise a microporous filter sheet, a woven or non-woven fabric or a porous metal membrane. When it is a porous tube, the porous tube may comprise a porous metal tube, a porous carbon tube, a porous ceramic tube, a woven or non-woven fabric tube, or the like. Such an artifact, ie whether it is in the form of a membrane or a tube, will hereinafter for brevity be referred to as a membrane, unless otherwise indicated. Hence, by means of the method of the present invention, a dual layer or composite membrane is formed. The method may include dynamically forming the composite membrane by contacting the porous membrane in situ with an aqueous solution of a salt of the hydrated metal, and thereafter contacting the hydrous metal-coated membrane thus formed with the polyelectrolyte by circulating a solution comprising the polyelectrolyte in a suitable solvent past and through the membrane. The invention will now be described with reference to the following non-limiting examples: EXAMPLE 1 1.1 Synthesis Equipment A vacuum line was set up as indicated in Figure 1. Hence, in Figure 1, reference numeral 10 generally indicates a vacuum line. The vacuum line 10 comprises a vacuum pump 12, a flow line 14 leading from the vacuum pump 12, a stop-cock 16 in the flow line 14, a bleed valve 18 leading front the flow line 14 downstream of the stop-cock 16, a water trap 20 located in the flow line between the bleed valve 18 and a further stop-cock 22, and a vacuum gauge 24 at the end of the flow line 14. From the flow line 14 leads a plurality of flow lines 26 each provided with a two-way valve or tap 28. Each of the valves 28 has a connecting conduit 30 adapted for connection to a reaction vessel (not shown). The conduits 26 all lead into a common flow line 32 to which is connected a pressure gauge 35. Into the flow line 32, at point 34, can be bled in an inert gas, such as argon, for flushing out the system, and a stop-cock 36 is also provided in the flow line 32. The vacuum line 10 hence utilizes the two-way valves 28 to facilitate the alternate use of high vacuum to de-gas reaction mixtures in reaction vessels connected to the conduits 30, and inert gas to flush out the system. Figure 2 shows, schematically, one of the reaction vessels for connecting to the conduits 30 of the vacuum line of Figure 1. In Figure 2, reference numeral 40 generally indicates a reaction vessel which comprises a glass container 42 having a neck portion 44 providing a filler opening. A nozzle 46 extends radially from the container 42 and is provided with a stop-cock 48. The nozzle 46 is connected to the conduits 30 of the vacuum line 10 of Figure 1. Figure 3 shows, schematically, distillation equipment used. In Figure 3, reference numeral 50 generally indicates the distillation equipment. The equipment 50 includes a round-bottomed flask 52, a vigreaux column 54 extending upwardly from the round-bottomed flask 52, and a dropping funnel 56 leading into the round-bottomed flask 52. A thermometer 58 extends into the top of the vigreaux column and a condenser 60 extends outwardly, downwardly from the top end of the vigreaux column. At the downstream end of the condenser 60 there is provided a monomer trap, ie one of the reaction vessels or traps 40 of Figure 2. 1.2 Evaluation and Characterization Equipment Gel-permeation chromatography ('GPC') was done with a Waters (trade name) 150°C instrument connected to a Waters Data Module (trade name). The column used for the GPC work, which is aqueous in nature, was 1 Millipore (trade mark) E-500 column. Dilute solution viscometry was done with an Ubbelohde (trade name) viscometer. All viscometry was done in a water-bath at 313°K. Temperature control was achieved by using a circulator. pH Titrations were effected with a Metrohm (trade name) automatic titrator. Membrane coating and evaluation equipment, as indicated in Figure 4, was also used. Hence, in Figure 4, reference numeral 80 generally indicates membrane coating and evaluation equipment. The equipment 80 includes a motor 81 operatively connected to a pump 82. The suction side of the pump is operatively connected to a vessel 83, for containing a solution. Inside the vessel 83 there is located a cooling coil 84 which is fitted with a cut-off valve 85 electrically connected via a temperature control means 86 to a temperature sensing means 87 protruding into the vessel 83. pH Measurement means 88 also is located inside the vessel 83, as is an electrode 90 which is electrically connected to a conductivity meter 92. To the discharge side of the pump 82 there is connected a conduit 94. A by-pass line 96 leads from the conduit 94 back to the vessel 83, and is provided with a shut-off valve 97. The conduit 94 is provided with a pressure gauge 98 and then passes sequentially through three tortuous path desalination test cells 110. Downstream of the cells 110 there is provided another pressure gauge 100. Downstream of the pressure gauge 100 there is provided a back-pressure valve 102 and a flow meter 104. A conduit 106 leads from the flow meter 104 back into the vessel 83. Referring to Figures 5A and 5B, one of the tortuous path desalination test cells 110, using circular flat sheet membranes, and which was used to form and evaluate the dual layer membranes, is described in more detail. The cell 110 comprises a stainless steel body 112 with inlet and outlet connections 111, 115 respectively, which are connected to the conduit 94. Located within the cell 110 are acrylic inserts 74 providing a tortuous flow path, against which is contacted the membrane 79 backed up with filter paper discs 78 and stainless steel mesh discs 77. The upper and lower sections of the cell are bolted together and leakage around the edges of the membranes is prevented by rubber O-rings 75. Permeate passing through the membrane 79 is discharged through a permeate outlet 108 and is returned to the vessel 83 via conductivity flow cells 113 and a conduit 114 (see Figure 4). In use, water containing a low concentration of the salt is pumped at a set rate past three flat-sheet membranes 79 in the cells 110 at a relatively high pressure of 6MPa. Permeate passes through the membranes 79, through the cells 113 where the conductivity is measured, and back, via the flow line 114, to the feed tank 83 where it is mixed with the water which by-passed, via the flow line 109, the cells 110. In this way, the feed concentration was kept constant. 1.3 Polymerizations 1.3.1 Pre-reaction Sequence All reactions were carried out in reaction vessels of the type described in 1.1 and shown in Figure 2. The reaction vessel 40 was covered with stainless steel gauze (not shown) to safeguard against pressure build-up. After the ingredients had been added , the vessel was sealed by means of a rubber sealing cap (not shown) inserted in the neck portion 44, the stop-cock 48 on the vessel was closed and the vessel immersed in a freezing mixture of ice and water or in cold isopropanol. Degassing and flushing with the vacuum line of Figure 1 were carried out on all reaction mixtures in order to remove all traces of oxygen from the system. The vessel was attached to the vacuum line 10 via the side arm 46. The degassing and flushing was effected as follows: The stop-cock 48 on the reaction vessel was opened. The two-way tap 28 on the vacuum line was then switched to the vacuum side, subjecting the reaction mixture to vacuum. This caused the dissolved gases, including oxygen to be evacuated and the two-way tap 28 was left in this position until bubbling of the reaction mixture stopped. The two-way tap 28 was then switched to the position which allowed the argon gas, supplied to the gas side of the vacuum line (see Figure 1), to fill the reaction vessel. The two-way tap was than switched to the vacuum side again in order to remove all the argon and other gas remaining in the reaction mixture. This was done five times. 1.3.2 COPOLYMERIZATION 1.3.2.1 2 Propenoic acid and ethenyl alcohol (acrylic acid and vinyl alcohol) To a mixture of freshly distilled 2-propenoic acid (45,0 g, 6,25 X10⁻¹ moles) and ethenyl acetate (30g, 3,49 X10⁻¹ moles) in 1,4 dioxane (150,0 ml) was added benzoyl peroxide (0,30 g; 1,23 X10⁻³ moles) and the mixture degassed. The stirred reaction mixture was heated to, and maintained at 348°K for 10 minutes. The formed copolymer was isolated by precipitating it with diethylether. Yield 7,5 g or 10% of Polymer PAA/VAC-2. This copolymer was then dissolved in an excess of 2N aqueous NaOH and heated and maintained at reflux temperature for 24 hours. The polymer was isolated by precipitating with methanol. 1.3.3 TERPOLYMERS 1.3.3.1 2-Propenoic acid and ethenyl alcohol and ethenyl acetate (acrylic acid and vinyl alcohol and vinyl acetate) To a mixture of 2-propenoic acid (10,8 g, 1,5 X10⁻¹ moles) and ethenyl acetate (73,1 g, 8,5 X10⁻¹ moles) in 1,4-dioxane (150 ml) was added benzoyl peroxide (o,30 g, 1,23 X10⁻¹ moles). The reaction mixture was degassed and then heated to, and maintained at 348°K for 20 minutes, while stirring. The polymer was isolated by precipitation with diethyl ether. Yield: 5,8 g or 7,73% of polymer PAA/VAC-3. The polymer was then dissolved in an excess of 2N aqueous NaOH and heated at reflux temperature for 1 hour. The resulting terpolymer formed due to partial hydrolysis of the ethenyl acetate component, was isolated by precipitation with methanol. Yield: 5,10 g or 86,2% of terpolymer PAA/VOH/VAC. 1.4 MEMBRANE FORMATION 1.4.1 Introduction The formation conditions affect the performance of dynamically formed membranes. For comparative purposes, formation conditions for all membranes were standardized. Figures of merit which depend on both flux and rejection were chosen as basis for comparison. The figures of merit can be represented by A²/B where A is a membrane constant for water permeation in g/cm².s, and B is the membrane constant for salt permeation in g/cm².s. As poly(acrylic acid) is the present state-of-the-art polyelectrolyte in dynamically formed composite membranes, the formation conditions chosen were those recommended for hydrous zirconium oxide-poly(acrylic acid) composite membranes. Membranes made with all other polymers have been compared with that made with poly(acrylic acid)after - (i) completion of formation (pH 7,00) (ii) 18 hours of use (pH 7,00) (iii) pH 8,00 was reached (iv) pH 9,00 was reached. 1.4.2 Formation of Dynamically formed Composite Membranes The procedure used was based on that described in an article by Johnson, Minturn and Wadia in J. Electroanal, Chem. 37 , 267, (1972), with small modifications as detailed in 1.4.2.1, 1.4.2.2 and 1.4.2.3. 1.4.2.1 Cleaning Procedures The formation of a membrane was always preceded by a thorough cleaning of the membrane coating and evaluation equipment. The procedure recommended was: (i) Wash with aqueous NaOH (pH 11,00) for 1-4 hours at 308°K. (ii) Rinse with reverse osmosis permeate (hereafter called RO permeate). (iii) Wash with aqueous HNO₃ (pH 1,00); wash for 1-3 hours at 323°K. (iv) Rinse with RO permeate until the pH of the permeate equals the pH of the feed. (v) Repeat until a check for Fe++ present by using Prussian Blue as indicator is negative and all oil contaminants are removed. This is especially important after long shut-down periods. 1.4.2.2 Formation of the Zirconium Layer The recommended procedure was: Use Millipore filters, HA, rated at 0,5 µm as backing material in the cells. Add RO permeate in the feed tank (Figure 5) and circulate at 3,67 1.min⁻¹ through the system. Adjust the back pressure to 2 MPa. Bring the pH to 4,00 with HNO₃. Add NaNO₃ to 2 g/ℓ. Then add the zirconium salt (Zr (NO₃)₄) to 1,0 x 10⁻⁴ M. With the addition of the zirconium nitrate, the pH drops and is readjusted to between 3,75 and 3,90 using 10% sodium hydroxide solution. The back pressure is then increased by 1 MPa every 5 minutes until it reaches 6 MPa. The flux and rejection are monitored. The zirconium membrane is complete when values of 500-700 1m⁻²hr⁻¹ for flux and 30-55% for rejection is attained. The pH is then lowered to 2,00 with HNO₃ and the feed tank is drained. Fresh RO permeate is added and the pH adjusted to 2,00. The system is rinsed and the tank drained again in order to remove all membrane preparation chemicals. 1.4.2.3 Formation of the Polyelectrolyte-zirconium Membrane The recommended procedure was: Refill the tank with RO permeate and adjust the pH to 2,00. Add 2 g/ℓ NaNO₃ and recirculate at 3,67 ℓ/min and 6 MPa. Add 50 ppm polyelectrolyte. Now increase the pH by 0,5 pH units every 30 minutes with 10% sodium hydroxide solution, until the pH reaches 7,00. Flux and rejection measurements are monitored throughout the period of membrane formation and repeated 18 hours later, when the membrane has stabilized. At this point, the pH must be adjusted to 8,00 and the membrane allowed to equilibrate for 45 minutes before the flux and rejection are measured again. The pH is then adjusted to 9,00 and equilibration and measurements repeated. The data obtained can be fed into a computer programmed to evaluate the A²/B values at all four points of measurement. 1.5 POLYMER EVALUATION 1.5.1 Dynamic Membrane Formation Without wishing to be bound by theory, the Applicant believes that membrane formation occurrs as follows: The interaction between the polymer and the zirconium is by a mechanism of chelation, with two adjacent carboxylic groups chelating with a single zirconium atom. The mechanism of formation of a composite membrane is one of pore-filling, namely the hydrous zirconium oxide layer has pores, and it is into these pores that the polyelectrolyte migrates. Interaction between the zirconium and the polyelectrolyte takes place. When the pH is then increased, the polymer swells due to ionisation, and the pores of the zirconium membrane fill. Hence, due to the swelling of the polymer molecules, the membrane pore size decreases, and due to the increase in charge density these ion-exchange membranes will exhibit a higher rejection at pH 7,00 than at pH 2,00. 1.5.2 Results In order to evaluate the ability of the various polyelectrolytes to form dynamic membranes, measurements of flux and rejection were made after 30 minutes of formation (pH 2,50) and after 24 hours after the start of formation (pH 7,00). (i) Poly(acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) - Table 1. POLY(ACRYLIC ACID-CO-VINYL ACETATE) Polymer pH Time(h) Rejection(%) Flux(l.m⁻².d⁻¹) PAA/VAC-1.1 2,5 0,5 55,9 3 990 7,0 24,0 88,2 2 720 PAA/VAC-1.2 2,5 0,5 60,2 4 800 7,0 24,0 92,8 3 800 PAA/VAC-1.3 2,5 0,5 56,6 4 890 7,0 24,0 93,2 3 900 LEGEND PAA/VAC = Poly(acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) -1.1 = Polymer 1, membrane 1 -1.2 = Polymer 1, membrane 2 -1.3 = Polymer 1, membrane 3 The large increases in rejection, ranging from 32% to 36% over the measurement period, the high final rejection figures, and the flux decline clearly demonstrate the formation of dynamic membranes. (ii) Poly(acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) The final rejection figures for these copolymer membranes are in excess of 99%, and are given in Table 2. These experiments are described also in greater detail in Example 2. POLYMER PRESSURE RUN TIME 1h 18h 24h 70h PAA/VOH-1.1 6MPa 99,4% (2250) [12,8] 99,4% (2310) [13,2] 99,6% (2240) [19,2] 99,6% (2240) [16,4] PAA/VOH-1.2 6MPa 99,7% (2520) [28,8] 99,6% (2550) [21,9] 99,7% (2540) [29,0] 99,7% (2750) [31.4] PAA/VOH-1.1 1MPa 93,9% (635) [15,1] PAA/VOH-1.2 1MPa 93,6% (660) [15,1] LEGEND PAA/VOH = Poly(acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) -1.1 = Polymer 1, membrane 1 -1.2 = Polymer 1, membrane 2 Figures quoted in the above Table are: Figures without brackets : Salt rejection (NaNO₃,%) Figures in round brackets () : Flux (litres per square meter/day Figures in square brackets [] : Figure of merit (x 10 000). Results are obtained at a temperature of 35°C and a feed salt concentration of 2000 ppm. (iii) Poly(acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl acetate) The final rejection figures for these membranes are in excess of 97% and are given in Table 3. Polymer Pressure Time(h) 1 48 PAA/VOH/VAC-1.1 6 MPa 98,3 (1700) 98,0 (2210) PAA/VOH/VAC-1.2 6 MPa 87,8 (1569 97,7 (1975) PAA/VOH/VAC-1.1 1 MPa 92,2 (480) PAA/VOH/VAC-1-2 1 MPa 90,3 (370) LEGEND: PAA/VOH/VAC = Poly(acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl acetate) -1.1 = polymer 1, membrane 1 -1.2 = polymer 1, membrane 2 Figures quoted are Figures without brachets: salt rejection (%, 2000 ppm NaNO₃) Figures with round brackets: () Flux (litres per square metre per day) Results were obtained at a temperature of 35°C, a feed pressure of 6 MPa and a flow rate of 6 m/s. EXAMPLE 2 2.1 THE PREPARATION OF POLY(ACRYLIC ACID-co-VINYL ALCOHOL) 2.1.1 Method (a) Preparation of poly(acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) Acrylic acid (45,0 g, 0,625 moles) and vinyl acetate (30,0 g, 0,349 moles) in 1,4 dioxane (150 mℓ) was stirred for one hour while bubbling Argon through the mixture. The mixture was then heated to 75°C in a round-bottomed flask fitted with a reflux condenser. Benzoyl peroxide (0,294 g, 0,00121 moles) was then added. The reaction was terminated after a period of 40 minutes by the addition of hydroquinone (ca 0,3 g). The polymer was isolated by precipitation with ether. The polymer was purified by repeated washes with ether, and dried to constant weight under reduced pressure. Yield : 18,5 g or 24,7% of polymer PAA/VAC-4. (b) Hydrolysis of the poly(acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) to poly(acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) Poly(acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (9,1 g) was heated to reflux temperature in an excess of aqueous NaOH. The reaction, in a round-bottomed flask fitted with a reflux condenser, was continued for a period of 14 hours. The polymer was isolated by precipitation with methanol, and purified by redissolving in water and again precipitating with methanol. The polymer was dried to constant weight under reduced pressure. Yield : 8,5 g or 93,4% of polymer PAA/VOH-2. A membrane was formed with this polymer according to the method hereinbefore described. The results are tabled in Table 2 given hereinbefore. EXAMPLE 3 : POLY(ACRYLIC ACID) DYNAMIC MEMBRANE ON A TUBULAR MEMBRANE SUPPORT A dynamic zirconium oxide-poly (acrylic acid) membrane was formed using the standard formation procedure described under 1.4.2.3, on a porous support, comprising of a tube of nonwoven polyester fabric on which a polysulfone membrane was case using a 15% polysulfone solution in dimethyl formamide ("DMF"). The results are given in Table 4. Testing was done at 35°C, a flow rate of 6 m/s and a pressure of 4 MPa. EXAMPLE 4 : The PAA/VOH copolymer, the synthesis of which was described under Example 2, was evaluated as a dynamic membrane in treating an industrial effluent. The membrane formation conditions were standard as described under 1.4.2.3. Subsequent to membrane formation, the membranes were then exposed to the industrial effluent. The feedwater composition and reverse osmosis results are given in Tables 5 and 6 respectively.

Claims: A method of preparing a semi-permeable membrane suitable for reverse osmosis, a porous artifact is contacted with an hydrated metal oxide, to form an hydrated metal oxide coated artifact; and the hydrated metal oxide coated artifact contacted with at least one polyelectrolyte, thereby to form a polyelectrolyte layer in or on the hydrated metal oxide layer, characterized in that the polyelectrolyte layer comprises or consists of a polymer which has carboxylic acid functional groups as well as functional groups other than carboxylic acid groups, and which is selected from the group consisting in (i) poly (CH₂=C(Y₂)(COOH))-co-(CH₂=C(Y₃)(Y₄)) wherein (a) when Y₂ is -H and Y₃ is -H, Y₄ is -OCH₃, -OC(O)CH₃ or -OH; (b) when Y₂ is -halogen and Y₃ is -H, Y₄ is -OCH₃, -OC(O)CH₃ or -OH; (c) when Y₂ is -OCH₃ and Y₃ is -H, Y₄ is -OC(O)CH₃, -OH or -OCH₃; (d) when Y₂ is -OH and Y₃ is -H, Y₄ is -OCH₃, -OC(O)CH₃ or -OH; (ii) poly (CH₂=CH COOH)-co-(CH₂=CH-OH)-co-(CH₂=CH-(Y₈)) where Y₈ is -O-C(O)-(Y₉), Y₉ is -CH₃ or -(CH₂) n CH₃, n = 1 to 3 or Y₈ is -C(O)-O-(Y₁₀), Y₁₀ is -CH₃ or -(CH₂) n CH₃, n = 1 to 3 or Y₈ is -C(O)-CH₃ or Y₈ is -O-CH₃; (iii) the alkali metal salts or partial salts of the above polyacids. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that the metal of the hydrated metal oxide is selected from the group consisting in zirconium, aluminium and iron, and wherein the polymer has a molecular mass of 20 000 to 500 000. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2, characterized in that the polymer is selected from the group consisting in: (1) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (2) poly (2-chloro acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (3) poly (2-hydroxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (4) poly (acrylic acid-co-methyl vinyl ether) (5) poly (2-chloro acrylic acid-co-methyl vinyl ether) (6) poly (2-chloro acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (7) poly (2-methoxy acrylic acid-co-methyl vinyl ether) (8) poly (2-methoxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (9) poly (2-methoxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (10) poly (2-hydroxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl methyl ether) (11) poly (2-hydroxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (12) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (13) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl acetate) (14) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl ethanoate) (15) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl propionate) (16) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl butyrate) (17) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-methyl acrylate) (18) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-ethyl acrylate) (19) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-propyl acrylate) (20) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-butyl acrylate) (21) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl methyl ether) (22) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl methyl ketone) A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 inclusive, characterized in that the contacting is effected by covering the artifact in situ with an aqueous solution of a salt of the hydrated metal, and thereafter circulating a solution of the polyelectrolyte in a suitable solvent past and through the membrane. A semi-permeable membrane characterized in that it is formed by the method of any one of claims 1 to 4 inclusive. A semi-permeable membrane formed by the method of claim 1, wherein the polymer has a molecular mass of 20 000 to 500 000, and is selected from the group consisting of: (1) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (2) poly (2-chloro acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (3) poly (2-hydroxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (4) poly (acrylic acid-co-methyl vinyl ether) (5) poly (2-chloro acrylic acid-co-methyl vinyl ether) (6) poly (2-chloro acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (7) poly (2-methoxy acrylic acid-co-methyl vinyl ether) (8) poly (2-methoxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) (9) poly (2-methoxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (10) poly (2-hydroxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl methyl ether) (11) poly (2-hydroxy acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (12) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol) (13) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl acetate) (14) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl ethanoate) (15) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl propionate) (16) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl butyrate) (17) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-methyl acrylate) (18) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-ethyl acrylate) (19) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-propyl acrylate) (20) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-butyl acrylate) (21) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl methyl ether) (22) poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl methyl ketone)

Inventors: DOWLER, NORMAN ARTHUR, SANDERSON, RONALD DOUGLAS, VAN REENEN, ALBERT JOHANNES
Applicants: WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION
Application year: 1987
Main classification: B01D69
IPC codes: B01D69, B01D71