STIMULATION OF ANGIOGENESIS

Abstract: Method for stimulating angiogenesis in a mammal, characterized by the use of a modulator of collagen sysnthesis or of collagen fibril assembly. Preferably the modulator is an inhibitor of the enzyme proline hydroxylase. Preferably the modulator is selected from the group which includes cis-4-hydroxy-L-proline, 3,4-dehydro-L-proline, L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, L-proline analogues, and their pharmacologically active analogues and derivatives. The modulator may optionally be used together with a second stimulator of angiogenesis. Compositions containing said modulators are also claimed.

Description: STIMULATION OF ANGIOGENESIS This invention relates to the control of angiogenesis, and methods and compositions therefor. According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for stimulating angiogenesis in a mammal, characterized by the use of a modulator of collagen synthesis or of collagen fibril assembly. Background of the Invention Knowledge of factors controlling proliferation of the endothelium is essential for understanding the molecular and cellular basis of the normal process of capillary formation and of pathological processes such as abnormal retinal vasoproliferation leading to blindness, and tumor-induced angiogenesis. Full identification of the references cited hereinafter will be found at the end of this specification. By studying the migratory and proliferative responses of cultured endothelial cells it should be possible to identify those substances that might be involved in regulation of neovascularisation. A number of polypeptide growth factors has been shown to enhance vascular endothelial cell proliferation in vitro. These include 3T3-cell derived growth factor (McAuslan e_t a_l. , 1980), tumor-derived growth factor (Klagsbrun et_ a_l. , 1982), endothelial cell growth stimulator (ECGF; Maciag e: a_l. , 1981) , and epidermal growth factor (EGF; Ben-Ezra, 1978; McAuslan et a_l 1985) . The induction of new blood vessel growth and formation of a vascular network is elicited in animals by extracts of carcinoma cells (Folkman, 1974) or of normal bovine parotid glands (Fleming, 1959) . Partially purified fractions of quite low-molecular-weight substances (200-300 Dalton) from Walker carcinoma (McAuslan and Hoffman, 1979; Weiss eit a_l 1979; Fenselau et_ a_l . , 1981), bovine parotid glands, or bovine, liver (McAuslan e_t a_l., 1981) have been shown to be angiogenic by ocular implant or chick chorioallantoic membrane assays. It has been shown that low concentrations of copper ions can induce neovascularisation in the anterior eye chamber or corneal pocket and also migration ' of endothelial cells in culture (McAuslan, 1979; McAuslan and Gole, 1980;- McAuslan and Reilly, 1980) . Thus a wide variety of agents has been shown to be capable of inducing angiogenesis in various assay systems. Some of these agents appear to act via a leukocyte-mediated mechanism, since the response is blocked by pretreatment of the test animals with corticosteroids . It is known that some of the mediators produced in response to an inflammatory stimulus are angiogenic. Because of undesirable side effects of inflammation, an ideal agent . Although some such agents have been proposed, a mechanism for their action has not been discovered. A further limitation is imposed by the necessity for the agent to penetrate the target organ. It has been suggested that at least some angiogenic factors induce the synthesis or activity of a protease which attacks collagen, releasing active peptides. In previous studies on collagen synthesis, it was observed that the amino acid cis-4-hydroxy-L-proline (cis-HYPRO) acted as an inhibitor of the enzyme proline hydroxylase, with concomitant inhibition of assembly of collagen fibrils (Tan et al. 1983). If a "wound" is made by scratching a monolayer of cells grown in tissue culture, the "wound" is soon repaired by migration of cells into the space left by the scratch. Cis-HYPRO will prevent this migration of cells into the wound (Madri and Stenn, 1982). Surprisingly, and in contrast to the above finding, I have now found that cis-HYPRO will stimulate the migration of capillary endothelial cells in vitro. I have also fund that cis-HYPRO stimulates angiogenesis in vivo in the rabbit corneal pocket assay. I have found that compounds which stimulate endothelial cell migration in vitro are always angiogenic _in , vivo. However, because of the role of inflammatory mediators in some angiogenic systems, the converse is not necessarily true. Consequently, as a further confirmation of angiogenic activity, I have used an assay system in which an annular ring of silicone containing a matrix of highly purified • 3 atelo-collagen in which is embedded a 1 mm fragment of slow-release copolymer of polyethylene-vinyl acetate impregnated with the agent to be tested is implanted subcutaneously into rabbits. This system is biocompatible and non-inflammatory, and the assay is highly sensitive. I have also used a direct assay for induction of proliferation of capillary endothelial cells, as described by McAuslan et al (1983), since such proliferation is thought to play a secondary role in angiogenesis. A completely unexpected novel finding for which I have no explanation is that cis-HYPRO increases the proliferation rate of capillary endothelial cells. Other inhibitors of proline hydroxylase do not appear to do so. I have further found that other agents which modulate collagen synthesis or which inhibit proline hydroxylase will also stimulate angiogenesis in the above assays. Examples of such compounds include 3, 4-dehydro-L-proline (dHPro), and L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid (AZET) . Other proline analogues may also be useful. It appears that, in general, agents which modulate collagen synthesis or collagen fibril assembly orwhich inhibit proline hydroxylase will cause the production of defective collagen which is more susceptible to degradation by proteases. Capillary endothelial cells migrate along the gradient of inhibitor concentration, and form capillary tubules in vivo despite the defect in the collagen which is synthesized. Summary of the Invention Thus according to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of stimulating angiogenesis in a mammal, characterized by the use of a modulator of collagen synthesis or of collagen fibril assembly. Preferably the modulator is an inhibitor of the activity of the enzyme proline hydroxylase. More preferably, the inhibitory agent is selected from the group which includes cis-4-h droxy-L-proline, 3, 4-dehydro-L-proline, L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, L-proline analogues, and their pharmacologically active analogues and derivatives. n the invention may optionally be used. Combinations of one or more compounds according to the present invention together with one or more compounds according to my copending Australian provisional application PH7521 entitled "Stimulation of Angiogenesis and Control of Endothelialisation" or other stimulators of angiogenesis may also optionally be used. The compound according to the invention may optionally be administered in a slow-release form or in a biodegradable matrix. Detailed Description of the Invention I have used two principal assay systems to test compounds for their ability to stimulate or inhibit angiogenesis. The corneal pocket assay in rabbits as described by Gimbrone et al. (1974) was used according to the modification of McAuslan and Gole (1981). However, in this system it is extremely difficult to distinguish a directly acting angiogenic stimulus from one which is mediated by leukocytes (McAuslan et al. , 1983). Since endothelial cell migration is a primary event in neovascularisation, and since there is a correlation between the ability of certain metal ions to induce vascularisation and their ability to cause migration of cultured cells, such migration has been suggested (McAuslan 1979) as the basis for a quantitative assay of angiogenic activity. There is comparatively little information on the correlation between this activity and neovascularising activity, and furthermore, a number of unrelated substances will induce migration of cultured endothelial cells and neovascularisation (McAuslan 1979). Proliferation of endothelial cells is thought to be a response secondary to cell migration during new vessel formation. There are reports of low molecular weight neovasculogenic activities that can stimulate proliferation of cultured endothelial cells. However, the proliferative responses have been marginal and the reports are not in accord as to the minimal conditions or cell type necessary. Having used one or other of the above assays to purify fractions, they are usually confirmed as angiogenic by an indirect in vivo assay of activity such as the corneal pocket or chorioallantoic membrane assay. Materials and Methods Reagents The proline analogues cis-4-hydroxy-L-proline (cis-HYPRO), 3, 4-dehydro-L-proline (dHPro), cis-4-hydroxy-D-proline (cisdPro) and L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid (AZET) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, U.S.A.. To remove metal ions, they were dissolved in distilled water, applied to a column of Chelex 100 (Biorad), developed in quartz glass double distilled water, then recrystallized. This reduced the copper level to less than 0.06 parts per billion. Polymer Preparation Slow-release polymers of polyethylene vinyl acetate (Elvax 60, trade mark of Polysciences Corp.) were prepared by the method of Langer and Folkman (1976). For ocular and subcutaneous assays, sterile fragments of approximately 1 mm were used and for the chorioallantois assay, approximately 2 Rabbit Subcutaneous Assay An annular ring of silicone containing a matrix of highly purified atelo-collagen Type I (50 mg/ml in buffered saline) in which is embedded a 1 mm fragment of slow-release copolymer of polyethylene vinyl acetate impregnated with the agent to be tested is implanted subcutaneously into each rabbit between the dorsal dermal layer and the muscle fascia. Each polymer fragment is impregnated with a saturating amount (approximately 0.05. to 0.5 mg) of the solid agent to be tested, so that the agent diffuses out of the polymer and sets up a concentration gradient which changes with time. mp antat on was v a a rocar, an was per orme so as to avoid trauma to the vascular system. Controls showed no overt inflammatory response and no sign of inducing angiogenesis in surrounding tissue. After 10 days implants were examined in situ, photographed then excised and examined histologically. For each test substance there were at least 2 implants in each of 6 N.Z. white rabbits, one on the left and one on the right dorsal side. Corneal Pocket Assay The corneal pocket assay of Gimbrone et al (1974) as modified by Gol ' e and McAuslan (1981) was used on New Zealand white rabbits of 2 - 3 kg body weight. Opposite eyes of each •animal were used as control and test, respectively. The results were documented photographically and histologically 10 days postoperation. Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay The assay was conducted essentially as described in detail in the review of Gullino (1981) and results recorded at Day 5 to 6. However, I usually found it unnecessary to anchor 3 the polymer fragments (up to 2 mm ) and I introduced the polymer onto the membrane 1 hour after partially detaching the membrane. In both the corneal pocket assay and this assay it is impractical to determine the effective gradient of the diffusing agents. For this reason only the initial concentrations in the implants are cited. Cell Lines Clonal lines of bovine aortal endothelial cells, whose growth and maintenance was as described by McAuslan e_t_ al (1982) were used. Similar results were obtained with either type of cell line. A line of bovine retinal capillary endothelial cells free from mural cells was established .essentially by the procedures of Buzney and Massicotte (1979). Bovine corneal endothelial cell cultures were prepared and maintained as described by McAuslan et al (1979). Cultures of bovine retinal microvascular pericytes (mural cells) were established from bovine retinal capillaries by the method of Gitlin and D'Amore and maintained in Ham's F12 medium. All cell lines for experimentation on migration were used between their 8th and 12th passage. Each cell line was tested in its preferred growth medium but with the serum concentration reduced to 2%. Cell Migration Assays The procedure for studying induced endothelial cell migration as well as the quantitation of average track lengths has been presented in detail by McAuslan and Reilly (1980). Briefly, potential migration inducers were added to the medium covering cells, and migration determined by phagokinesis on colloidal gold - bovine serum albumin deposits 16 or 48 hours later. Track areas were estimated using a Bioquant image analysis system (Bioquant is a trade mark of Wild Leitz (Australia) Pty. Ltd. ) . Results are presented as the means of 25 tracks on each of 3 plates. Cell Proliferation Studies Confluence cultures of either aortal or retinal capillary endothelial cells were harvested using 0.25% trypsin in 0.2% Versene (trade mark) and resuspended in growth medium (medium 199 + 5% fetal calf serum + folate) (McAuslan et al 1979); cells were plated onto 60 mm Falcon plastic dishes and allowed to attach for 3 hours before changing the medium. Each test sample was added to replicate dishes. A further addition was made at Day 2 and counts of treated and control cells were determined at Day 4. Polypeptide Synthesis and Secretion High density cultures of endothelial cells (4x10 ~> - ~ -4 per cm ) were treated with cis-HYPRO at 0, 10 or 5 x 10 M for 4 hours in normal growth medium. .The medium was removed and the cell layers were washed and covered with medium containing the appropriate concentration of cis-HYPRO and free of serum. This was supplemented with sodium ascorbate (50 ug/ml) and Λ-amino propionitrile (80 μg/ml). Then cells were (specific activity) per ml of proline free medium 199 (Commonwealth Serum Labs) . Polypeptides secreted into the medium were harvested, separated by sodium dodecylsulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by autoradiography. The invention will now be illustrated by reference to the following non-limiting examples, together with the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 represents the effects of proline analogues on the growth of bovine aortal endothelial cells; Figure 2 represents the effects of proline analogues on the growth of bovine retinal capillary endothelial cells; Figure 3 represents the effects of proline analogues on the growth of bovine retinal microvascular pericytes; Example 1 Stimulation of Cell Proliferation Cultures of bovine retinal endothelial cells, bovine aortic endothelial cells, and bovine retinal pericytes (mural cells) were prepared as described above, and tested separately for their response to cis-HYPRO, cis-4-hydroxy-D-proline, and L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid. The results were normalised for each experiment as follows: 1. At each reading, the control was assigned .a value of 100%. The test value was expressed as a % increase or decrease, e.g. if control = 3 x 10 -4 cells/mm2 = 100% test = 6 x 10 -4 cells/mm2 test = 200%. 2. Arbitrary control values were calculated using control data for each experiment and the known cell doubling time for each cell line. e.g. Cell doubling time . = 24 hr. Initial seeding rate = 3 x 10 -4 cells/mm2 At day 2, cell number = 1.2 x 10 -4 = 100% These values were used to plot the control line for each graph, converting results back to cell counts. 3. Values for test results were converted back to cell counts, using the control value calculated in (2) above as 5 100%. e.g. % at day 2 = 200% Calculated control at day 2 = 100% = 1.2 x 10 -4 cells/mm2 Cell count - 2.4 x 10 -4 cells/mm2 0 The results are shown in Figures 1 to 3, in which the test results calculated in (3) and the control results calculated in (2) above are plotted against time in culture. In the figures BREC represents bovine retinal endothelial cells, BAE represents bovine aortic endothelial cells, and 5 BRPC represents bovine retinal microvascular pericytes. There is no essential link between migration and proliferation. Because of the relevance of cell migration to blood vessel proliferatio , it was of interest to know if Cis-HYPRO, dHPro or AZET affected cell proliferation at the 0 concentration optimal for migration induction. The results in Figures 1 to 3 show that at the concentration tested, these agents were not toxic to cells and caused no significant change in the rate of proliferation over at least seven days for BAE or BREC cells. 5 Example 2 Induction of Cell Migration A range of concentrations of cis-4-hydroxy-L-proline, 3, 4-dehydro-L-proline (dHPro) and cis-4-hydroxy-D-proline (cisDPro) and L-azetidine-2-carboxyic acid (AZET) was tested for ability to stimulate the migration rate of different cultured cells. AZET and dHPRO are known inhibitors of proline hydroxylase (Kerwar et al, 1975) and all three agents also interfere with synthesis and secretion of collagens (Cardinale and Odenfriend, 1974). An exception is CisDPro which is not incorporated into collagen. e resu s o an exper m n endothelial cells and retinal pericytes are shown in Table 1, in which each figure represent the mean value for 200 individual cells analysed 48 hours after the addition of the test compound. The medium was Ham's F12 medium containing 5% serum (v/v). Each agent was used at a concentration of 10- M. Table 1 Effect of agents on cell migration Agent Retinal Endothelial Ce 11s Retinal Pericytes Track Track Track Track Area Length Area Length (pn 2 xlO~ 3 ) (μm) (/ιm 2 xl0~ 3 ) (ιm) Control 13 152 7 106 cis-HYPRO 46.4 258 21.4 180 cis-D-hydroxyproline 13 152 - - .azetidine 15.5 172 6.8 106 dehydropro ' line 17.7 94 17.2 170 Cis-HYPRO strongly stimulated migration of both cell types, while cis-D-hydroxyproline had no effect, and azetidine had a marginal effect on retinal endothelial cells; dehydroproline had a small effect on retinal endothelial cells, and a stronger effect on retinal pericytes. The results of a second experiment, presented in Table 2, show that cis-HYPRO caused a significant increase in the rate of migration of retinal endothelial cells (BREC), aortal endothelial cells (BAE), corneal endothelial cells (BCE), and retinal pericytes (BRPC) . The optimal concentration of inducers for maximal migration rate was of the order of 10 M at which up to 2-3 fold increases in migration rates were achieved. The nature of the assay preclude a more accurate measurement of the optimal concentration. Similar results were obtained with AZET and dHPro. CisDPro was not active. At concentrations of inducers above 10 M there was a relative decrease in the rate of migration attained. Table 2 Migration rate in response to proline analogues Cell Concentration of Track Area (um 2xlO-3) Type inhibitor CisHYPRO CisDPro AZET dHPro BREC 5x10 -4 20.0 25.2 18.2 18.0 1x10-4 29.2 23.3 30.1 30.5 1x10-5 46.4 24.2 37.9 48.1 1x10-6 28.4 25.0 30.0 32.3 1x10-7 24.2 24.7 25.0 25.0 0 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 BCE 5x10 30.0 29.8 29.5. 30.5 1x10 -4 90.1 32.3 50.1 50.1 1x10-5 115.8 36.8 74.6 87.7 1x10-6 36.4 38.6 43.4 45.1 0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 BRPC 10 -5 21.3 6.7 13.5 12.1 0 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 BAE 10 -5 17.3 8.5 21.0 14.6 0 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 In Vivo Angiogenic Assay Cis-HYPRO and azetidine were assayed in rabbits using the corneal pocket assay and the subcutaneous assay as described above. The results are presented in Table 2. The figures represent the ratio of animals giving a positive angiogenic response to the total number of animals tested. Table 3 In Vivo angiogenic response Corneal Pocket Assay Subcutaneous Assay Control 0/6 0/6 cis-HYPRO 6/6 6/6 azetidine 0/3 3/6 Cis-HYPRO caused stimulation of angiogenesis in' both systems, whereas azetidine caused stimulation only in the subcutaneous assay. However, responses in the corneal pocket assay were weak, and the subcutaneous assay was found to be reproducible and effective for a number of chemically different angiogenic agents. When either HYPRO or AZET were tested in a further experiment using this assay, both gave positive angiogenic responses in each of 12 tests in 6 different test animals. dHPro was not found to be active. These results are summarized in Table 4. Table 4 Subcutaneous implant assay for angiogenesis Inhibitor No. of implants/Intensity of vascularisation' ++++ +++ ++ + - Control (no inhibitor) 10 Cis-HYPRO AZET dHPro Intensity of Vascularisation ++++ Large numbers of distinct capillary vessels invading the gel; numerous blood vessels growing towards the tube. Markedly angiogenic. +++ Fine blood vessels invading the gel. Less intense than above; fine blood vessels around the silicon tube. Strongly angiogenic. " ++ Few fine capillaries around gel periphery, causing a slight pink appearance; fine blood vessels around silicon tube. Weakly _angiogenic. + Collagen gel unchanged; fine blood vessels growing towards silicon tube; incipient angiogenesis. Collagen gel unchanged; no blood vessels around silicon tube. Non-angiogenic. Example 4 Cis-HYPRO as an Enhancer of Epidermal Growth Factor The angiogenic activity of epidermal growth factor, (EGF; Ben-Ezra, 1978) can be explained by its ability to induce capillary endothelial cell migration and proliferation highly potent inducer and is less active angiogenically than other growth factors such as transforming growth factor TGF- (Schreiber et al, 1986). Therefore we tested the possibility that the responses produced by Cis-HYPRO and EGF might be additive. The induction of bovine corneal endothelial cell migration by EGF, Cis-HYPRO or EGF plus Cis-HYPRO was compared. As shown in Table 5, the migration-inducing ability of EGF and Cis-HYPRO was at least additive over the limited range tested. I 'Table 5 Effect of cis-HYPRO on stimulation of angiogenesis by Epidermal Growth Factor Bovine corneal endothelial " . cell migration 10~ 3 um 2 /24 hours Control 35.8 EGF (lOOμg/ml) 116.0 cis-HYPRO (10~ 5 M) 56.4 EGF (100 μg/ml) + cis-HYPRO (10~ 5 M) 266.7 Thus cis-HYPRO or other proline analogues could be used to enhance the angiogenic effect of EGF, or of the active subunit of EGF which is responsible for angiogenesis. Example 5 Effect of Cis-HYPRO on Synthesis of Collagenous Polypeptides Since there was a marked fall in the migration rate achieved when the concentration of inhibitors was increased from lθ "5 M to 5xlO~ 4 M, I compared the levels of [ 14 C]-l belled polypeptides, precipitable by trichloracetic acid (10% w/v), from the medium used to maintain cells. Cells treated with 5xl0~ 4 M Cis-HYPRO secreted 60% (59,600 cpm/ml ) of the level secre e y con ro cu ure , treated with the lower level of Cis-HYPRO (10~ M) secrete (80,800 cpm/ml) as compared to control cultures. The above experiments show that random cell migration in_ vitro, as measured by increase in the area of phagokinetic tracks produced in a colloidal gold deposit, was increased significantly by Cis-HYPRO, dHPro or AZET. Both vascular and avascular endothelial cells responded, as did retinal pericytes. Thus this is a regulatory mechanism that may be common to many anchorage-dependent cell types. These experiments were initiated on the premise that the agents tested are known inhibitors of proline hydroxylase or of collagen synthesis and secretion and that interference with collagen synthesis might enhance migration. The migratory response (Tables 1 and 2) occurs over only a limited range of concentrations of inducers. Madri and Stenn (1982) showed that the endothelial cell migration studied by a cell onolayer wounding technique, and synthesis of collagen Types IV and V were inhibited by Cis-HYPRO, from which they concluded that continual collagen production is essential for cell migration. In the present experiments the optimal concentration for migration induction (10 M) was about 40 fold less than used by Madri's group to inhibit migration and block collagen IV formation. This raises the question of the mode of action of proline analogues as migration inducers. Their action on collagen synthesis at the cellular level is complex. The key question is why Cis-HYPRO (or other proline analogues) should induce cell migration at such low concentrations (10 -5M) whereas higher concentrations (5x10 —4M) were non-inducing or even inhibitory. Without wishing to be bound by any proposed mechanism for the observed beneficial effects, I conclude that whereas continuous collagen synthesis might be needed for cell migration (Madri and Stenn, 1982) at low analogue levels, either a small change in collagen structure occurred which was sufficient to impair matrix assembly and destabilise step(s) for cell migration is highly sensitive to low concentrations of the analogue inhibitors. Since chemically different proline analogues were effective and since there is some steric specificity as evidenced by the lack of activity of CisDPro, it is unlikely that migration induction was due to some migration inducing contaminant such as copper or selenium. Whether Cis-HYPRO and other analogues work as positive effectors (e.g. causing formation of a migration peptide or enhancing the activity of a specific protease) or as negative effectors (e.g. by impairing formation of a critical anchorage component or by blocking synthesis of a migration inhibitor) remains to be established. While the detailed mechanism of action and cellular responses remains to be resolved the conclusion from these results is that for the icrovascular system perturbation of collagen related systems by low concentrations of proline analogues is sufficient to provoke cell migration and angiogenesis. Applications of the Invention The present invention is capable of application in a wide variety of clinical fields. Stimulation of angiogenesis can be used to enhance the healing of bμrns and wounds, especially those involving large tissue defects, acceptance of skin or organ grafts, and can also be used in reconstructive and cosmetic surgery, including the use of subdermal implants, .and in prosthetic surgery, particularly that involving vascular prostheses. Such stimulation may be used in any situation wherein endothelial cell migration and regeneration of endothelium are advantageous, or where an increase in blood flow is desirable, e.g., stroke, heart disease, or foetal blood insufficiency. This application of cis-HYPRO excludes its use as an agent which might improve the performance of implantable prosthetic devices such as pacemaker electrodes by virtue of properties other than stimulation of angiogenesis. It will be clearly understood that the invention in its general aspects is not limited to the specific details referred to hereinabove. References cited herein are listed on the following pages. REFERENCES Ben-Ezra, D. (1978) Amer. J. Ophthalmol. _86_ 455. Buzney, S.M. and S.J. Massicotte (1970) Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. JU3 1191-1195 Cardinale, G.J. and S. Udenfriend (1974) Adv. Enlymol. jU. 245 Fenselau, A., S. Watt, and R.J. Mello (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256 9605-9611 Fleming, H.S. (1959) J. Dent. Res. _8 374-385 Folkman, J. (1974) Adv. Cancer Res. _1 331-358 Gimbrone, M.A. , R.S. Cotran, S.B. Leapman and J. Folkman (1974) J. Nat. Cancer Inst. _5_2 413-427 Gitlin. J.D. and P.A. D'Amore (1983) Microvasc. Res. 2_6_ 74. Gullino, P.M. (1981) in Tissue Growth Factors ed. R. Baserga; Springer-Verlag, N.Y. p. 427-449 Kerwar, S.S., R..J. Marcel, and R.A. Salvador (1975) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. _66_ 1275. Klagsbrun M. , R. Sullivan, P. D'Amore, K. Butterfield and J. Folkman (1982) J. Cell Biol. (Abstract 9091) 1 20i Langer, R and J. Folkman (1976) Nature 263 797-799. McAuslan, B.R. (1979) EMBO Workshop on Specific Growth Factors, Rome, Oct. 9-11. McAuslan, B.R., V. Bender, W. Reilly, and B.A. Moss (1985) Cell Biol. Int. Reports _9 175. McAuslan, B.R. and G.A. Gole (1980) Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. U.K. 100 (3) 354-358 McAuslan, B.R. G.N. Hannan, and W. Reilly (1980) Exptl Cell Res. _128 95-101 McAuslan, B.R. and H. Hoffmann (1979) Exptl Cell Res. 199 181-190 McAuslan, B.R. and W. Reilly (1980) Exptl Cell Res. 130 147-157 McAuslan, B.R., W. Reilly and G.N. Hannan, J. Cell Physiol (1979) JDfJ 87. McAuslan, B.R., W. Reilly and G.N. Hannan (1981) in Progress in Microvascular Research (ed. D. Garlick) p.470-501 McAuslan, B.R. W. Reilly, G.N. Hannan, and G.A. Gole (1983) Microvascular Res. 2_6 323-328 Maciag, TO., A. Hoover, M.B. Stemmerman, and R. Weinstein (1982) J. Cell Biol. _9_1 420-426 Madri, J.A. and K.S. Stenn (1982) Am. J. Pathol. 106 180-186 Schreiber, A.B., M.E. Winkler, and R. Derinck (1986) Science 232 1250. Tan, E.M.L., L. Ryhanen, and J. Uitto .(1982) J. Invest. Dermatol. 80 261-267 Brit. J. Cancer 40 493-496.

Claims: CLAIMS : 1. A method of stimulating angiogenesis in a mammal, characterized by the use of a modulator of collagen synthesis or of collagen fibril assembly. 2. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said modulator is an inhibitor of the activity of the enzyme proline hydroxylase. 3. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said modulator is selected from the group which includes cis-4-hydroxy-L-proline, 3, 4-dehydro-L-proline, L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, L-proline analogues, and their pharmacologically active analogues and derivatives. 4. A method according to any one of Claims 1 to 3, wherein two or more of said modulators are used. 5. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein said modulator is used together with a second stimulator of angiogenesis. 6. A method according to Claim 5, wherein said second stimulator is an anti-inflammatory agent. 7. A method according to Claim 6, wherein said anti-inflammatory agent is selected from the group which includes salicylic acid, anthranilic acid, phenyl acetic acid, and thiazole acetic acid, and their pharmacologically active analogues and derivatives. 8. A method according to Claim 5, wherein said second stimulator of angiogenesis is epidermal growth factor or a pharmacologically active analogue or fragment thereof. 9. A method according to any preceding claim wherein said modulator is administered so as to achieve a diffusion gradient of concentration to which endothelial cells respond. 10. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein said modulator is administered in a slow-release form or in a biodegradable matrix. 11. A method according to any preceding claim wherein the concentration of said modulator is 10 -7 to 10-4 mole/1. . comprising as effective component a modulator of collagen synthesis or of collagen fibril assembly, together with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent. 13. A composition according to Claim 12, wherein the modulator is selected from the group which includes cis-4-hydroxy-L-proline, 3,4-dehydro-L-proline, L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, and their pharmacologically active analogues and derivatives. 14. A composition according to Claim 12 or Claim 13, comprising two or more of said modulators. 15. A composition according to any one of Claims 12 to 14, which additionally comprises a second stimulator of angiogenesis. 16. * A composition according to Claim 15, wherein said second stimulator is an anti-inflammatory agent. 17. A composition according to Claim 16, wherein the anti-inflammatory agent is selected from the group which includes salicylic acid, anthranilic acid, phenyl acetic acid, and thiazole acetic acid, and their pharmacologically active analogues and derivatives. 18. A composition according to Claim 15, wherein the second stimulator of angiogenesis is epidermal growth factor or a pharmacologically analogue or active fragment thereof. 19. A composition according to any one of Claims 12 to 18 wherein the modulator is present at a concentration of 10 to 10~ 4 mole/1. 20. A composition according to any one of Claims 12 to 19 wherein the modulator is compounded into a slow release form or into a biodegradable matrix. 21. A method of stimulating angiogenesis in a mammal, substantially as hereinbefore described with references to the examples. 22. A composition for stimulating angiogenesis in a mammal, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the examples.

Inventors: MCAUSLAN BRIAN RICHARD, MCAUSLAN, BRIAN, RICHARD
Applicants: BIOTA SCIENT MANAGEMENT, BIOTA SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT PTY. LTD.
Application year: 1987
Main classification: A61K31
IPC codes: A61K31, A61K38, A61K45, C07D205, C07D207