Processes and products for surface treatment

Abstract: Silica products obtained from trivalent metal e.g. Al compounds and silica can be used as corrosion inhibitors or adhesion promoters for organic coatings on surfaces by way of no-­ rinse or phosphating treatment or as pigments.

Description: This invention relates to surface treatment and more particularly to processes for preparing surfaces for the subsequent application of organic coatings. The treatment of surfaces, especially metal surfaces, prior to the application of organic coatings such as paints, lacquers, adhesives, plastics and the like, is known to be of value not only in increasing the properties of the treated surfaces, in terms of its corrosion resistance, but also as improving the adhesion of the organic coatings enabling them to be more effective. US-A-3 506 499 describes a process in which an aqueous solution of chromic acid and colloidal silica is applied to the surface formed from zinc or aluminium. GB-A-1 234 181 describes a process in which an aqueous solution comprising hexavalent chromium, trivalent chromium and silica is dried on a metal surface. The application of solutions comprising hexavalent chromium which is toxic is consequently undesirable. US-A-3 650 783 describes the preparation of colloidal suspensions of silica particles coated with an insoluble trivalent metal phosphate, eg iron or aluminium phosphate. In such suspensions none of the trivalent metal compound is present in solution in the aqueous phase. The present invention comprises a process of preparing a surface for the subsequent application of an organic finishing coating in which an aqueous acidic dispersion is applied to the surface and heated so as to deposit thereon an essentially inorganic priming coat of anticorrosion or adhesion-promoting material, the dispersion comprising an aqueous solution of an acidic trivalent metal compound of iron or aluminium and a suitable anion, or a mixture thereof, and silica of fine particle size, with a silicon to trivalent metal atom ratio of 0.2-30:1 and substantially free of metals capable of valency of at least 5. An acidic compound is a compound an aqueous solution of which has an acid pH. For use according to the invention the preferred trivalent metals are aluminium and iron (ferric). Significant amounts of divalent metals e.g. manganese and/or alkaline earth metals such as magnesium, are also preferably absent in the dispersions of this invention which are usually substantially free of alkaline earth metals. The dispersions are usually non oxidizing. The process of the present invention is carried out by coating the surface with the dispersion of the trivalent metal compound and silica and drying the dispersion on the surface to leave a coated surface. Without rinsing, the dried surface may then be coated with an organic coating which is itself then dried and usually cured e.g. by stoving at elevated temperature. For this no-rinse process and the dispersions for use therein, significant amounts of metals in valencies of at least 5 or metals capable of valencies of at least 5 are absent. In particular, the dispersions applied are substantially free of oxymetal anions of such metals. Thus metals having 5 or 6 valency, such as molybdenum, niobium, tantalum, vanadium and tungsten e.g. in the form of their oxyanions, and chromium in the form of hexavalent chromium are also absent. The trivalent metal ion is associated with a suitable anion i.e. an anion which does not detract from the proposed use of the treated surface. Preferably the anion is such that the metal salt is sufficiently water soluble for the proposed use. Examples of suitable anions are mono and diacid phosphate, fluoride and silicofluoride. The acceptability of the anion may vary with the nature of the surface being treated. In a no-rinse coating process the associated anion is retained in the coating. Therefore anions which are deleterious, for example those which themselves promote corrrosion, such as chloride and sulphate, should not be used in coating metal surfaces. The trivalent metal compound is preferably mixed with the silica (or precursor thereof) under acid conditions. The anion of the acid is usually subject to the same criteria of solubility and non-interference in the use of the metal silica product as is the anion with the trivalent metal cation. Preferably the metal compound is an acid salt e.g. dihydrogen phosphate, with any pH adjustment needed by the addition of phosphoric acid or hydrogen fluoride. Most preferred are ferric trisdihydrogen phosphate and aluminium tris(dihydrogenphosphate) and mixtures with phosphoric acid or the corresponding metal mono hydrogen phosphate. In using such acid phosphates, the atom ratio of trivalent metal to P for no-rinse coating is usually 0.2-0.45:1 e.g. 0.23-0.4:1 such as 0.3-0.36:1 or 0.33-0.36:1 especially for aluminium compounds and 0.23-0.33:1 e.g. 0.23-0.3:1 especially for ferric compounds. The silica utilised in this invention should be finely divided with a small particle size to form a suspension which can be coated evenly over the surface to be treated. Amorphous silica, which has been obtained pyrogenically from silicon tetrachloride, or which has been precipitated in an aqueous medium from alkali silicates, may be used. Thus the silica is usually hydrophilic non-crystalline and colloidal. It usually has Si-OH groups on the surface and preferably only such groups, though some of these may be replaced by Si-O-Na or Si-O-Al groups. The average surface area of the silica is usually 10-1000 m²/g such as 30-1000 m²/g, e.g. 100-500 and especially 150-350 m²/g. The silica particles usually have an average particle size less than 170nm or but may be of 1-200nm e.g. 1-50nm such as 4-30mm or especially 8-20nm. Thus silica gel and precipitated silica may be used, but colloidal silica and fumed silica are preferred especially for no-rinse coating processes. In certain processes it may be possible or even preferable to employ a precursor of amorphous silica i.e. a hydrated form of silica in the processes and the compositions of this invention. The most preferred sources of silica for the use in this invention are the products which are sold under the Trade Mark AEROSIL in particular those which are fumed silicas with average particle size of 5-20nm and surface areas of 150-350 m²/g especially 150-250 m²/g. Less preferred grades of silica for non-rinse coating are those liquid dispersion products prepared by ion-exchange processes from a silicate solution, such as those sold under the Trade Mark LUDOX which have particle size of 5-30nm and 100-550m²/g surface areas and SiOH and SiONa groups on the surface. The molar ratio of silica to trivalent metal (i.e. silicon to trivalent metal) is within the range 0.2-30:1, including 1.5-30:1, 2.5-30:1, and 3.5-30:1. Preferred ranges are 1.5-20:1 such as 1.5-10:1. For use in no-rinse coating processes preferred molar ratios are 2.5-10:1 or 2.5-9.5:1 and especially 3-8:1 or 5-8:1 or alternatively 5.5-30:1, e.g. 5.5-9.5:1. The trivalent metal and silica are reacted together and/or with the underlying substrate surface and/or with phosphoric acid or hydrofluoric acid at some stage prior to the end of the final step in the production of the treated surface. This reaction can occur at a temperature of at least 50°C e.g. at least 150°C and this temperature may be reached either during drying of the mixture of ingredients in a no-rinse coating process on the surface and/or in the drying and curing of an organic coating applied thereto subsequently. Preferably in a no-rinse coating process the dispersion is dried at elevated temperatures e.g. 50-300°C and then the organic coating is cured at elevated temperature usually higher than the previous temperature e.g. at least 150° such as 150-300°C. The reaction product produced by these heating processes may be a metal coated silica, optionally complexed with fluoride and/or phosphate, or a complex metal silicate or silicophosphate. The aqueous dispersions used for the purposes of this invention are usually made directly from the trivalent metal compound and silica (or precursor thereof) Thus a compound of the metal is dissolved in water, in the presence of acid e.g. phosphoric or hydrofluoric acid if desired to give a solution of the required concentrations with which there is mixed the silica, preferably itself in the form of an aqueous dispersion or less preferred as finely divided solid. Products which are free from agglomerated silica particles are preferred for use in this invention. Where there is a tendency for the silica particles to form agglomerates we prefer to agitate the dispersion vigorously in order to reduce the size of these agglomerates before mixing with the trivalent metal compound. The aqueous dispersion is usually at pH 1.5-2.5 especially 1.8-2.2. The dispersions when ready for use in no-rinse coating processes preferably comprise of 1-20% e.g. 3-15% by weight of dissolved and dispersed material, but are advantageously made in a more concentrated form with 3-50% e.g. 15-40% of such material, for dilution when ready for use. Thus the dispersions may contain 0.01-6.6g atoms/1 e.g. 0.02-0.45g atoms/1 of the trivalent metal, 0.05-5g atoms/1 e.g. 0.15-3.3g atoms/1 of silica and usually 0.01-3g atoms/l e.g. 0.06-2.0g atoms/1 of phosphate. The preferred dispersions are those in which the metal compound is an aluminium phosphate especially aluminium dihydrogen phosphate. In the inorganic no-rinse coating process for pretreatment of the surface before organic coating e.g. painting, the concentration of the treatment solution should be sufficient to ensure that the desired weight of coating is deposited per unit area of the surface to be treated. Preferably the dried-on film will have a weight of from 20 to 5000g/m², more preferably from 50 to 1000g/m²; coating weights for aluminium are preferably 100-300 mg/m² and for steel preferably 300-700 mg/m². The quantity of solution applied to the surface varies with the method of application and the nature of the surface to be and the concentration of the solution will be adjusted so as to provide the desired weight of dried coating on the particular surface. The surface to be treated may conveniently be formed from any non-porous material such as metal, glass or plastic. The treatment of surfaces formed from common metal forms a preferred aspect of the present invention. The invention finds particular application in the treatment of surfaces formed from iron, aluminium, tin or zinc, or alloys comprising one or more of these metals alloyed with themselves or with other metals such as copper, nickel and/or magnesium. Examples of alloys or alloy surfaces which can be treated include stainless steel and aluminium alloys of international designations 3103 and 5052. Examples of other particular metals include aluminium can stock, mild steel, galvanised mild steel and tin plate. The metal may be in the form of a thin surface layer formed on a substrate. The substrate may be metallic e.g. tin plate or non-metallic e.g. plastics material. The substrate may take the form of individual articles, tubes, rods, wires, plates, panels or strips. However the treatment is preferably carried out by the mechanical application of a treatment solution to the metal surface and the treatment is thereby particularly useful for the treatment of metal strip and metal sheets. The processes may also be used to treat surfaces formed from plastics such as polypropylene, ABS plastics and polyurethanes. They can also be used to treat surfaces coated with plastics, paints or other organic materials to promote adhesion of a second coating layer such as a paint or lacquer. In a preferred embodiment the processes can be used to treat a surface layer of resin applied electrophoretically e.g. a cataphoretic resin, which layer is subsequently to be painted. In this embodiment the processes find particular utility in the treatment of films of cataphoretically applied acrylic resins, such as those sold under the Trade Mark ELECTROCLEAR 2000, prior to subsequent painting. The surface must be clean prior to the application of the treatment solutions if good results are to be obtained. Normally the surface will be cleaned if necessary in order to remove oil, dirt and corrosion products and subsequently rinsed with water prior to the application of the solution. Where the surface is formed of a metal, the drying of the dispersion coating is preferably carried out by heating the metal to a temperature of at least 50° such as 50-300°C usually at least 150°C. Drying may be carried out at lower temperatures, such as 50-150°C e.g. 50-100°C, but, particularly when the surface is a metal surface, this heating is especially in the presence in the dispersion of an accelerator such as hydrofluoric acid, nickel salts, nitrates, or hydrogen peroxide. The preferred accelerator for use in the no-rinse coating processes is hydrofluoric acid. The amount of accelerator added is usually such that the molar ratio of silica to accelerator ion is at least 0.5:1 and preferably at least 5:1 such as a range of 0.5:1 to 250:1. The use of excessive quantities of accelerator, especially hydrofluoric acid, in the coating pretreatment processes may impart undesirable properties to the subsequent organic coating and in general the amount of accelerator added will be controlled so as to avoid this. The pH of the dispersions after addition of the hydrofluoric acid is usually 1.3-2.3. Preferably the amount of fluoride ion in the dispersion for coating the metal surface is 0.5-20 g/dm³ especially 2-6 g/dm³, lower amounts necessitating use of high drying temperatures. Thus with 2-6 g/dm³ drying temperatures can be 60-90°C e.g. 70°C. Preferably the dispersion of silica and trivalent metal compound contains a nickelous salt, added e.g. as nickelous sulphate instead of fluoride accelerator, but preferably added as nickelous fluoride e.g. as the tetrahydrate. Especially there is used nickelous fluoride and extra hydrofluoric acid in an atom ratio of Ni to total F of 1:2-4. Both nickel and fluoride ion are preferably present whatever the silicon to trivalent metal atom ratio but especially when it is 0.2-5:1, e.g 1.5-3.5:1 or 1.5-20:1 such as 2.5-10:1. Amounts of nickelous ion in the dispersion to be applied to the surface are usually 0.1-20 g/l e.g. 0.1-10 such as 0.1-3 g/l and especially 0.1-1 g/l or 0.1-0.6 g/l with a molar ratio of Si:A1:Ni of 90:11:1 to 1:0.5:1. When the nickel is added as nickelous fluoride with extra fluoride the amount of nickelous and fluoride ion in the dispersion ready for application to the surfaces is preferably 0.1-10g/l or 0.1-3 g/l e.g. 0.1-1.0 such as 0.1-0.6 g/l; the molar ratio of Si:A1:Ni:F is preferably 600:80:1:2 to 30:4:1:4. These benefits are especially applicable in the treatment of steel for which the results can be better than with chromate pretreatment operations and also aluminium panels e.g. for aluminium can stock. The dispersion of the invention may be made and stored ready for use, or may be kept in the form of a 2 pack composition in which the first pack contains the silica, and the second pack at least some of the other ingredients usually the trivalent metal compound. Any nickel and/or fluoride present can be in either pack, and if there is nickel fluoride in the second pack, the trivalent metal compound can be in either pack. However for increased storage life the first pack preferably contains the silica and not the other ingredients, while the second pack preferably contains all the remaining ingredients. When ready to be used, at least some and preferably all the contents of the two packs are mixed, the amounts of components taken from each pack being such that on mixing the dispersion of the invention are made. After the coating process without rinsing there may be applied to the dried treated surface an organic coating which is usually dried at elevated temperatures as described above. The organic coating is usually a paint, lacquer, powder coating or adhesive. Examples of suitable vehicles for the coating are thermosetting resins and preferred are alkyd resins, polyester paints, epoxy resins e.g. epoxy novolac resins, vinyl dispersions and drying oils and may be water or organic solvent based. The drying step may be simply to remove the water or solvent but is preferably also to cure the organic coating by stoving. Stoving paints are preferred. Also in the organic coating applied to the surface there may be paint additives such as pigments, fillers and chopped fibres for example calcium carbonate titania or glass fibre. The organic coated substrate can be in the the form of steel pipes e.g. water, gas or oil pipes or formed into aluminium cans. It has been also found that the combination of certain proportions of silica to trivalent metal especially aluminium, in the pretreatment of aluminium panels gave surprising results not possessed by other combinations of silica to the metal, and when no such change in behaviour was obtained with comparable proportions when applied to steel. Thus with aluminium panels e.g. of alloy 3103 atom ratios of Si:A1 in the dispersion of the invention of 3.5-20:1 and especially 5.5-12:1 e.g. 6-9:1 after no rinse treatment drying, and organic coating and curing gave much better results in adhesion tests with atomic ratios less than 3.5:1. In this case the organic coating was preferably a coil coating enamel e.g. an unsaturated polyester. The invention is illustrated by the following examples: Example 1 Metal treatment solutions having the composition set forth below were prepared. The trivalent metals and the phosphate were introduced as the metal dihydrogen phosphate. The aluminium dihydrogen phosphate was in the form of a 48% w/w S.G. 1.48 solution of aluminium acid phosphate of A1:P atom ratio of 0.34:1. The silica was pyrogenic silica sold under the Trade Mark AEROSIL 200 with an average surface area of 200 m²/g and average particle size of 12nm. It was introduced in fine aqueous dispersion. In Example G aluminium oxide was dissolved in a hydrofluoric acid solution. The solution and dispersions as described above were mixed in the required proportion to form concentrated dispersions which were then diluted to give dilute dispersions which were ready for use as a metal treatment solution as such or after addition of fluoride added as 40% aqueous hydrofluoric acid. EXAMPLE M 3+g /l PO 4³⁻g/l SiO₂g/l F⁻ g/l A A1 6.02 65 100.0 B A1 3.01 33 50.0 C A1 1.00 11 16.0 D A1 1.00 11 16.0 8.0 E A1 6.02 65 25.0 F A1 3.01 33 12.5 G A1 1.00 - 16.0 8.0 H Fe 6.20 33 50.0 J A1 1.00 11 16.0 4.0 K A1 1.00 11 16.0 1.0 L A1 1.00 11 16.0 0.5 The pH of the solution in Ex A-L was 1.4-2.5. The dispersions of Examples A-L were applied to metal panels which had been cleaned to give a surface free from water breaks. The panels for Example A, B, E, F, H, were of mild steel and for Ex C, D, G, J, K, L, were of aluminium. A Sheen spinner was used to give coating weights varying between 200 mg/m² and 800mg/m² after drying at peak metal temperatures between 70 o C and 235°C. The panels coated with the dispersions of Ex A-C, E, F and H were dried at peak metal temperatures of 235°C, while those Ex. D, G, J, K, L, were dried at 70°C. The dry panels were coated with (i) an epoxy lacquer (ii) a polyester paint or (iii) an organosol using a Sheen spinner or bar coater. The panels were then dried at the appropriate paint stoving temperature in the region of 200-250°C. The painted panels were tested for adhesion by a zero T bending test and the Erichsen test, and for corrosion by a salt spray test in accordance with ASTM-B117. Painted mild steel panels were tested for cathodic disbondment using 40 g/l sodium hydroxide solution at 70°C with an applied voltage of 5 volts for 1 hour. The results were compared to those in which the metal phosphate/silica was replaced by the optimum coating weights of the chromate/silica dispersions of the type described in GB-A-1234181. The results with the aluminium panels treated in Ex. C, D, J, K, L, were better than with chromate/silica while those with the rest of the Examples were comparable to use of chromate/silica. Example 2 250 gms of the amorphous fumed silica used in Ex 1 was dispersed in a portion of demineralised water by adding the silica in aliquots whilst vigorously stirring the dispersion. Further demineralized water to bring the volume of water up to 1 litre was slowly added to the vessel. The resulting dispersion was filtered through glass wool to remove the few agglomerated large particles and leave a silica dispersion. The dispersion was mixed into the solution of aluminium dihydrogen phosphate used in Ex 1, in the ratio of 4:1 by volume to give a concentrated dispersion with a mole ratio of silica to aluminium of 7.46:1. The resulting concentrate was diluted for use in the treatment processes by the addition of five volumes of demineralised water to one volume of concentrate and then addition of 1% by volume of 40% aqueous hydrofluoric acid to give a aluminium silica coating or pretreatment solution. 15cm x 10cm panels of aluminium (5052 alloy) were degreased in trichloroethylene vapour, immersed in nitric acid (10%) for 30 seconds, rinsed in water, immersed in a hot, alkaline etch cleaner for 10 seconds, rinsed, mechanically desmutted and rinsed with hot water. The panel was dried by spinning using a Sheen spinner. The cleaned panels were divided into three groups (i) a control group which was not pretreated and (ii) and (iii) which were pretreated by coating by applying a pretreatment solution on the spinner and removing the excess by spinning for 20 seconds. The panels were then dried to a peak metal temperature of 70°C to leave a total coating weight of 250 mg/m². For group (ii) the aluminium silica pretreatment solution was used. For group (iii) a chromate silica based pretreatment solution of the type described in British patent 1234181 was used. One different panel from each group was coated with each of the following organic finishes, each of which was supplied by EIAN Industrial Coatings (a) a white unsaturated polyester paint (UP1230D) product (b) an epoxy-phenolic lacquer (Konserv A133S) product (c) an organosol (ICE 2007 111 C) product (d) an epoxy-phenolic lacquer (IP 1602) product The curing temperatures for finishes (a)-(d) were 160-180°C, 280°C, 270° and 200°C respectively with curing times of 10, 1.5, 1.5 and 12 minutes respectively.. All the panels were then tested for resistance to corrosion by pressing into cans and exposure to hot acid solution. The amount of corrosion was then assessed by eye. In each case the group (i) untreated panels were severely attacked. The group (ii) panels were attacked to a lesser degree than those of group (iii) which was much smaller than the degree of attack found in group (i). Example 3 A concentrated aqueous dispersion was made up by mixing 33 parts by weight of a 30% by weight aqueous colloidal silica dispersion, 20 parts by weight of the aqueous aluminium dihydrogen phosphate solution as used in Ex 1 and 7 parts by weight of demineralized water. The silica dispersion was sold by Monsanto as SYTON D30 and had SiONa and SiOH groups thereon, and an average particle size of 7 nm and surface area of 320 m²/g A pretreatment coating dispersion was made by adding 1 part by volume of the concentrate to 5 parts by volume demineralized water. A metal substrate coated with a layer of an acrylic cataphoretic resin, sold under the Trade Mark ELECTROCLEAR 2000, was immersed in the pretreatment solution for 30 seconds. The substrate was removed from the pretreatment solution and allowed to drain and dry at ambient temperature. A polyester/epoxyphenolic stoving paint (McPhersons No. 162 White, Stove 160°C for 10 mins) was applied to the surface of the substrate using a Sheen Spinner. The coated metal was stoved at 160°C for 10 mins. The experiment with the resin coated substrate was repeated but without the pretreatment coating solutions. The substrate which had been pretreated before painting showed excellent paint adhesion in a cross hatch test. In comparison the substrate for which the pretreatment had been omitted, exhibited almost complete loss of paint adhesion in the cross hatch test. Example 4 The process of Example 2 was repeated with the aluminium phosphate silica concentrate being diluted with different volumes of demineralized water Ex 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, and 4e namely 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 volumes respectively per volume of concentrate and 1% by volume of 40% aqueous hydro fluoric acid solution being added to the diluted concentrate to give dry coating weights on the aluminium strip of 1,000, 500, 250, 180 and 100 mg/m² respectively. In these experiments all the paints of Ex 2 were used. Tests on the painted panels showed the results to be in the decreasing order Ex 4d, 4e, 4c, 4b, 4a. All but Ex 4a were better than corresponding experiments done with a chromate silica dispersion. Example 5 The no rinse process of Ex 4b was repeated (Ex 5a) with thin gauge mild steel (blackplate) with the aluminium phosphate silica concentrate diluted with 3 volumes of water to give a diluted dispersion to which 1% v/v of 40% hydrofluoric acid was added. The experiment was also repeated (Ex 5b) with the Aerosil 200 silica replaced by an equal weight of Aerosil OX50 fumed silica of 40 nm particle size and 50m²/g surface area, and the concentrate diluted with only 2 volumes of water. The dry coating weights were 500 mg/m² and 750 mg/m² for Ex 5a and 5b respectively. After drying at 70°c the panels were coated with the following finishes (i) pigmented vinyl dispersion applied to a wet film weight of 8g/m² and cured 10 min at 210°C in a vinyl dispersion applied and cured as in (i) and (iii) an epoxyphenolic resin (Konserv ICE 200 8A with catalyst) applied to a wet film weight of 6g/m² and cured at 280°C for 90 sec. All the combinations of silicas and finishes gave results better than with the corresponding unpretreated organic finished panels and those of Ex 5a with finish (i) gave results better than or comparable to corresponding panels with a chromate based silica dispersion. Example 6 The processes of Ex 5(a) and 5(b) were repeated (Ex 6(a) 6(b)) with cleaned panels of mild steel suitable for pipeline use and also with 2 other silicas, namely (Ex 6c) Aerosil K315 which is a premade 30% aqueous dispersion of fumed silica supplied by Degussa with the silica having an average particle size 15nm and surface area 170m²/g, for which the concentrate was diluted with 7 volumes of water before addition of the hydrofluoric acid, and the layer dried at 160°C, and (Ex 6d) Aerosil MOX 170 (with the same average particle size surface area as K315), for which 3% v/v of the hydrofluoric acid was used. Dry coating weights were for Ex 6a-6d 500, 750, 180 and 180 mg/m² respectively. The dried panels were lacquered with a bronze tinted clear stoving lacquer (Macphersons 4244/000) to a dry coating thickness of about 15 micro metres. In cathodic disbondment tests, the pretreated painted panels were much better than untreated painted panel and comparable to those with the chromate silica pretreatment. Example 7 The process of Ex 4 (b) was repeated with mild steel panels and with panels of aluminium alloy 3103 and varying proportions of the silica dispersion to aluminium phosphate solutions. In each case the concentrate obtained was diluted with 3 volumes of water for the steel panels and 5 volumes of water for the aluminium panels, before application to the metal to give coating weights of 250mg/m² for aluminium and 500 mg/m² for mild steel respectively. The organic finish was an unsaturated polyester coil coating enamel MacPherson's 3586/105 applied and cured for 10 min at 232°C. The panels were tested in a Zero T bend test. The pretreated coated mild steels scored 7-9 out of 10 in the test (10 being the best result) when the volume proportions of silica dispersions to aluminium phosphate solution varied from 9:1 to 2:8 i.e. molar ratios of silica to Al of 16.6:1 to 0.46:1. The pretreated coated aluminium panels gave the following results v/v silica to phosphonate 9:1 8:2 7:3 6:4 2:8 molar Si:Al 16.6:1 7.4:1 4.3:1 2.8:1 0.46:1 Score out of 10 3 7 3 0 0 Example 8 The process of Example 4b was repeated with a mild steel panel and, instead of addition of 1% of the hydrofluoric acid there was added nickelous fluoride and hydrogen fluoride in an atom ratio Ni:F of 1:2.3 to give a dispersion ready for coating the metal with an atom ratio of Si:A1:Ni:F of 140:19:1:2.3. The dry coating weight on the metal was 500 mg/m². After drying at 70°C the panel was coated with enamel used in Ex 7 and stoved at 232°C for 10 min. The pretreated painted panel was tested for adhesion in a zero bend test and for corrosion in a 500hr. neutral salt spray test and proved to be better overall than a corresponding painted panel pretreated with the chromate silica dispersion. The pretreated painted panels were also compared in a cathodic disbondment test performed as in Ex 1; the panel pretreated with A1, Si, Ni and F compounds gave better results than with Cr and Si compounds. Example 9 In this example modifications of the process of Example 8 were used. The aqueous silica dispersion was of 15% w/v concentration and was mixed with the aqueous aluminium acid phosphate solution as in Ex 1 in various proportions. The concentrates obtained were diluted with 3 volumes of water and the nickel fluoride and hydrofluoric acid (atom ratio Ni:F of 1:2.3) as used in Ex 8. The treatment mixture obtained was applied to mild steel and dried, painted and cured as in Ex 8. In zero bend tests the coated panels from no rinse treatment mixtures with volume proportions of silica dispersion to aluminium phosphate solution of 9:1, 8:2, 6:4, 4;6 and 2:8. (Si:A1 atom ratios of 10.0:1, 4.5:1, 2.6:1, 0.75:1 and 0.28:1 respectively gave results comparable to those with chromate/silicate dispersions Example 10 The process of Ex 4b was repeated with a 48% w/w aqueous solution of ferric tris (dihydrogen phosphate) and phosphoric acid with an atom ratio of Fe to P of 1:4 instead of the aluminium phosphate solution. The coating weights were about 500 mg/m². The volume ratios of the silica dispersion to ferric phosphate solution were 9:1 to 1:9 giving atom ratios Si:Fe of 18.75:1 to 0.23:1. The experiments were repeated with volume ratios of silica dispersion to ferric phosphate solution of 7:3 to 1:9 giving atom ratios of Si:Fe of 4.9:1 to 0.23:1 and dilutions of the concentrates with 5 volumes of water to give coating weights of about 250mg/m². The pretreated painted panels gave good results in the zero T bend test comparable to those with chromate silica pretreatment. Example 11 The process of Ex 2 was repeated with the replacement of the addition of 1% of the hydrofluoric acid by nickelous fluoride and hydrogen fluoride in an atom ratio of Ni:F of 1:2.3 to give a dispersion ready for coating the metal with an atom ratio of Si:A1:Ni:F of 93:12:1:2.3. The aluminium panels were then coated, dried painted and cured as in Ex 2. The results were even better than those of Ex 2 group (ii)

Claims: A process of preparing a surface for the subsequent application of an organic finishing coating in which an aqueous acidic dispersion is applied to the surface and heated so as to deposit thereon an essentially inorganic priming coat of anticorrosion or adhesion-promoting material, the dispersion comprising an aqueous solution of an acidic trivalent metal compound of iron or aluminium and a suitable anion, or a mixture thereof, and silica of fine particle size, with a silicon to trivalent metal atom ratio of 0.2-30:1 and substantially free of metals capable of valency of at least 5. A process according to claim 1, in which the silicon to trivalent metal atom ratio is 1.5-30:1. A process according claim 2, wherein the silicon to trivalent metal atom ratio is 5.5-30:1. A process according to claim 3, wherein the silicon trivalent metal atom ratio is 5.5-9.5:1. A process according to claim 2, 3 or 4, wherein the weight of the priming coating is 20-5000 mg/m². A process according to claim 5, wherein the coating weight is 50-1000 mg/m². A process according to any of claims 1 to 6, wherein the dispersion is dried at 50-300°C. A process according to any of claims 1 to 7, wherein the surface is metallic. A process according to claim 8, wherein the surface is formed of iron, aluminium, tin or zinc, or an alloy comprising one or more of these. A process according to claim 8, in which the metallic surface is of aluminium or an aluminium alloy. A process according to claim 8, in which the metallic surface is of steel. A process according to claim 10 or 11, in which the dispersion contains fluoride ions. A process according to claim 12, in which the dispersion contains from 2 to 6 grams of fluoride per litre. A process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the trivalent metal compound is an aluminium acid phosphate. A process according to claim 10, wherein an aluminium surface is coated with an aqueous dispersion of an aluminium acid phosphate and colloidal silica with an atom ratio of silicon to aluminium of 5.5-12:1. A process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the dispersion applied to the surface is at pH 1.5-2.5. A process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein after drying of the dispersion, the surface is coated with an organic coating. A process according to claim 17, wherein the organic coating consists of a heat curable organic material which is then cured. An aqueous acidic dispersion for preparing a surface for the subsequent application of an organic finishing coating by a process according to any of claims 1 to 18, comprising an aluminium acid phosphate in aqueous solution and silica of fine particle size, with a silicon to trivalent metal atom ratio of 0.2-30:1, said dispersion being substantially free of metals capable of valency of at least 5. A dispersion according to claim 19, in which the phosphate is aluminium dihydrogen phosphate. A dispersion according to claim 19 or 20, wherein the silicon to trivalent metal atom is 1.5-30:1. A dispersion according to claims 21 wherein the ratio is 5.5-9.5:1. A dispersion according to any of claims 19 to 22 which is substantially free of alkaline earth metals. An aqueous dispersion according to any of claims 19 to 23 containing fluoride ions. A dispersion according to claim 24 which contains 0.1-10 g/l fluoride ion.

Inventors: COLLIER JOHN RICHARD, HOLKER KENNETH URMSTON, COLLIER, JOHN RICHARD, HOLKER, KENNETH URMSTON
Applicants: ALBRIGHT & WILSON, ALBRIGHT & WILSON LIMITED
Application year: 1987
Main classification: C23C22
IPC codes: C09D7, C09D5, C23C18, B01J13, C23F11, C23C22, B05D1