PROCESS FOR REMOVING ARSINE FROM LIGHT OLEFIN-CONTAINING HYDROCARBON FEEDSTOCKS

Abstract: The present invention relates to a process for removing arsine from a light olefin-containing hydrocarbon feedstock, said process comprising the steps of (a) passing said feedstock over an absorbent material comprising nickel deposited on a support material wherein nickel is present as both nickel oxide and metallic nickel; and (b) recovering a stream having a substantially reduced arsine content.

Description: The present invention relates to a process for removing arsenic, present in the form of arsenic hydride or arsine, from light olefin-containing hydrocarbons. More particularly, the present invention relates to a process for the removal of arsine from hydrocarbon feedstocks containing propylene. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Industrial applications of light olefin-containing hydrocarbons, and particularly liquified propylene, have become more increasingly specialized. The technology as presently developed utilizes highly efficient catalysts to convert these hydrocarbon feedstocks into final product such as polymers. However, these highly efficient catalysts are very sensitive to contaminants, particularly arsenic contaminants, found in these hydrocarbon feedstocks. In addition to the well known contaminants such as hydrogen sulfide and mercaptans, the light olefin-containing hydrocarbon feedstocks normally contain a small quantity of arsine. Usually arsine is present to the extent of only several hundred parts per million (ppm) by weight. However, even this small amount is normally beyond the allowable limits of an acceptable product. The presence of arsine, even at very low concentrations, oftentimes renders olefins valueless for many purposes. For example, high purity olefins are required for the satisfactory production of many polymeric products, especially those useful as plastics, including polymers of ethylene, propylene, and the like. However, arsine is a powerful reducing agent which appears able to reduce the olefin polymerisation catalysts and thus to deactivate these. As a result, there has been a real need to improve techniques for removing arsine from light olefin-containing hydrocarbons, especially those used for polymer production. Some of the known methods for removing arsine from light olefin-containing hydrocarbon streams include the following. US Patent 3,782,076 (Carr. et al., assigned to GULF R & D) discloses a process for reducing the arsenic, believed to be present as arsine, from gaseous hydrocarbon streams by contacting said streams with supported lead oxide; however the presence of sulfur compounds is said to interfere with the removal of arsine, and further the supported lead oxide may not be regenerated when sulfur compounds are present in the feed. US Patent 3,833,498 (Stahfeld, assigned to GULF R & D) discloses a process for reducing the arsenic, believed to be present as arsine, from gaseous hydrocarbon streams by contacting said streams with activated carbon derived from a bituminous coal and containing cobalt, nickel, molybdenum and vanadium. However, the feed should be substantially dry and free of sulfur compounds. DE-A-2 149 997 discloses a process for removing arsenic compounds from hydrocarbons by contact with one or more hydrogenation metals, preferably palladium. US-A-4 593 148 discloses removal of arsine from gaseous streams comprising hydrogen sulphide over a sorbent material comprising copper oxide and zinc oxide. GB-A-2 162 194 discloses a process for removing carbonyl sulphide from liquid hydrocarbon feedstocks by passage over an absorbent material comprising nickel deposited on a support, the nickel being present in the form of metallic nickel (35-70 wt% of total nickel) and nickel oxide. The problems in purifying propylene and the like olefins are singularly complicated by the weak difference between boiling points of propylene and arsine which makes difficult the arsine removal by fractionation. As a results, the levels of arsine impurity in propylene stocks are oftentimes intolerably high. Accordingly, it can be seen that there is a need for a process to reduce the arsine concentration in a light olefin-containing hydrocarbon stream to 50 ppb by weight or lower. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention is directed to a process for the removal of arsine from light olefin-containing hydrocarbon feedstocks, and more particularly from hydrocarbon feedstocks containing propylene and from about 0.06 to 150 ppm by weight of arsine. In accordance with the present invention, arsine is removed by passing the hydrocarbon feed over an absorbent material comprising nickel deposited on a support material and wherein the nickel is present in the forms of metallic nickel and nickel oxide and wherein the total weight of nickel and nickel oxide constitutes up to about 80% by weight of the absorbent, with the provision that metallic nickel should not represent less than 10 wt.% nor more than 50 wt.% of the absorbent. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention relates to the removal of arsenic hydride, often referred to as arsine, from light olefin-containing hydrocarbon streams. Light olefins, as used herein, are C₂-C₆ olefins. Of particular interest is the treatment of hydrocarbon streams containing light olefins which are to be subsequently subjected to polymerization using polymerization catalysts. As stated previously, hydrocarbon streams containing propylene present a special problem because of the near boiling points of propylene and arsine. While the subsequent discussion will describe the invention in terms of treating propylene-containing feeds, it should be understood that the present invention is applicable to the treatment of light olefin-containing hydrocarbon streams in general, i.e., hydrocarbon streams containing ethylene, propylene, butenes, pentenes, hexenes, or any combination thereof. The arsine removal process of the present invention reduces the arsine concentration in the treated hydrocarbon feedstock to 50 parts per billion by weight (ppb) or lower. The original arsine concentration may be as high as 1000 parts per million by weight (ppm) or higher depending on the process of making and the origin of the hydrocarbon feedstock. Due to the expense and specialization of the present invention, it is preferred to utilize other less costly and less complex processes to reduce the arsine concentration to 70 ppm or less prior to treatment with the absorbent of the present invention. The absorbent material of the present invention comprises nickel deposited on a support material, the nickel being present both as metallic nickel and as nickel oxide. Silica, silico-aluminas, alumina, kieselguhr, zeolites and other similar materials, whether amorphous or crystalline, can be utilized as the support. The total weight of nickel and nickel oxide may represent up to about 80 wt.% of the absorbent material, with the provision that metallic nickel should not represent less than 10 wt.% nor more than 50 wt.% of the absorbent. Preferably, the weight ratio of metallic nickel to nickel oxide is of about 0.4 to about 2.0, and the absorbent comprises from about 30 to about 60 wt.% of support material. When carrying out the process of the invention with an absorbent material outside this definition, the results obtained are no longer satisfactory, although some arsine may still be removed. Whilst not wishing to be bound by any theory, the Applicant believes that larger crystallites are formed if the Ni/NiO ratio is higher, thus leading to a lesser efficiency; similarly, an excessive total nickel content tends to lower the specific surface and consequently the efficiency, while a too low total nickel content would lead to an insufficient capacity for absorbing arsine. The nickel can be deposited on the support by any of the several methods well known to those skilled in the art. For example, nickel can be deposited on the support by dissolving nickel nitrate in water, mixing the solution with the support and precipitating the nickel, for example in the form of nickel carbonate, and subsequently washing, drying and calcining the precipitate. The nickel deposited in this manner is then partially reduced by means of hydrogen to form metallic nickel, the remainder being in the form of nickel oxide. In general, the size of the nickel crystallites after reduction is from 1 to 2 nm. The size of the nickel crystallites depends on the extent of reduction carried out. In fact, if the degree of reduction is increased, the size of the crystallites is increased but the absorbent material obtained does not have the desired properties. On the other hand, if the degree of reduction is too low, the crystallites still have good dimensions but the quantity of nickel available in this case is too small to ensure successful purification of the feedstock. The specific surface area of the absorbent material obtained after reduction is generally between 100 and 200 m²/g. The particle size of the absorbent material depends especially on the pressure drop allowed in the reactor; it has been noted, however, that it is advantageous to use the absorbent material in finely divided form. Preferably, the particle diameter of this material when spherical does not exceed about 3.5 mm and is most preferably from 1 to 2.5 mm; when cylindrical particles are used, they preferably have a diameter of from 1 to 2 mm and a length from 3 to 8 mm. Whilst not wishing to be bound by any theory, the Applicant believes that arsine can react with the metallic nickel and/or with nickel oxide, forming arsenic metal, which either forms an NiAs alloy or is deposited on the support. The absorbent material is usually prepared ex situ and stored either under a convenient saturated liquid hydrocarbon, like cyclohexane or dodecane, or under a non-oxidizing atmosphere, like CO₂ or N₂. It has been found that propylene adsorbs onto the absorbent material when contacted with the feedstocks containing propylene during the arsine removal from said feedstocks, and that the propylene adsorption reaction is exothermic, occurring to a greater extent during start-up. Under certain conditions, and particularly when the absorbent material used is stored under a non-oxidizing atmosphere, the temperature rise may be very important, more particularly at the surface of the material of which the temperature may be much higher than that measured with a thermocouple, and it may thus damage the absorbent material. In addition the high temperatures cause undesired side-reactions, more particularly propylene dimerization and trimerization. The dimers are hexenes which copolymerize with propylene and break the regularity of the linear chain of isotactic polypropylene. As a result, the copolymer has a lower crystallinity than polypropylene, and thus a lower melting point; its mechanical resistance is also lower. The Applicants have found that an excessive increase in the temperature of the absorbent material can be avoided by previously conditioning the material by passing over said material an inert gas flow containing a minor amount of at least one light olefin, preferably propylene in a concentration of from 0.1 to 5 vol %. The inert gas, which should contain the least possible of oxygen, is usually nitrogen. It is preferable to begin the conditioning procedure by passing essentially pure inert gas. The conditioning step is preferably carried out at about atmospheric pressure, at or below ambient temperature. It is continued until the propylene concentration at the outlet equals that introduced. It is also possible to monitor the passage of an exotherm, shown by thermocouples introduced within the absorbent material. It is known that, when the absorbent material is prepared ex situ and stored under a non-oxidizing atmosphere (usually stabilized under CO₂), the traces of oxygen usually present therein have a negative effect on the properties of the absorbent material. This negative effect can be prevented if the absorbent material is pretreated prior to its conditioning by passing therethrough, at a temperature of from 150 to 250°C and preferably at about atmospheric pressure, a gaseous flow comprising first an inert gas (containing the least possible amount of oxygen) then a mixture of inert gas and hydrogen containing an increasing concentration of hydrogen, before purging it free of hydrogen with an inert gas flow. In utilizing the latest generation of Ziegler-type catalysts in the production of polypropylene, it is essential that the propylene feedstock contains less than 50 ppb and preferably less than 30 ppb of arsine. It has been unexpectedly found that by passing the propylene feedstock over an absorbent material as hereinbefore described, the feedstock obtained has a arsine content not exceeding 50 ppb. This result is unexpected due to the degree of purity obtained and due to the fact that this process can be carried out either in the presence or in the absence of water. In polypropylene production, the hydrocarbon feedstock generally comprises more than 75 wt.% propylene, more particularly from 85 to 99 wt.% propylene, and up to about 10 ppm arsine. In one embodiment of the present invention, the propylene feedstock is passed over the absorbent material at a temperature of from -10°C to 80°C, preferably of from 10°C to 40°C, and under sufficient pressure to keep the medium in the liquid phase. The weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) utilized is from 0.1 to 25 kg/kg.h and preferably from 1 to 10 kg/kg.h. In polyethylene production, the hydrocarbon feedstock generally comprises more than 80 wt.% of ethylene, more particularly from 90 to 99 wt.%, and up to about 10 ppm of arsine. In another embodiment of the present invention, the ethylene feedstock is passed over the absorbent material at a temperature of from -10°C to 80°C, preferably from 10°C to 40°C, under a pressure of at least 1 MPa, and with a WHSV of from 0.1 to 25 kg/kg.h, preferably of from about 1 to about 10 kg/kg.h. The examples which follow are given in order to provide a better illustration of the process of the present invention. Example 1 A liquid hydrocarbon feedstock containing 99.5% of propylene, less than 5 ppm of water, and having a residual arsine content of 150 000 ppb was passed over an absorbent material consisting of 43.3% by weight of silica-alumina as the support, on which nickel was deposited, the nickel being present in the form of NiO and of metallic Ni, the weight ratio of metallic nickel to nickel oxide being of 0.668. Before reduction, the absorbent material contained about 49% by weight nickel. The absorbent material was finely divided to give an average particle size of about 1 mm. The specific surface area of this material was 145 m²/g, while its bulk density was of 0.81. It was stored under cyclohexane. The above mentioned feedstock was thus passed in the upflow mode through the absorbent material at a temperature of 25°C, under a pressure of 1.5 MPa (15 bars) sufficient to keep the feedstock in the liquid phase and at a WHSV of 3.7 kg/kg.h. The purified feedstock had an arsine content as shown in the Table I. Assuming that all arsine was absorbed during the first 96 hours, the capacity of the absorbent may thus be calculated to be of at least 53 g arsine/kg absorbent. Hours Arsine (ppb) 24 < 50 48 < 50 72 < 50 96 100 Example 2 A liquid hydrocarbon feedstock containing 99 wt.% propylene, 10 ppm of water and having a residual arsine content of 305 ppb passed over the same absorbent material as in Example 1, at a temperature of 20°C, at a pressure of 1.5 MPa (15 bars) sufficient to keep the feedstock in the liquid phase, and at a WHSV of 6 kg/kg.h. After 24 hours, the purified feedstock still had an arsine content lower than 3 ppb, even though the feed contained water. A polymerization test was carried out, using a Ziegler-type catalyst. Under identical conditions, the yield, expressed as the weight ratio of polypropylene to catalyst, was of 10 000 for the unpurified feed and of 32 000 for the purified feedstock. Example 3 A liquid hydrocarbon feedstock containing 95.6 wt.% propylene, 3.8 wt.% propane and 0.6 wt.% C₄ hydrocarbons, the water content of which being of about 30 ppm, and having a residual arsine content of 60 ppb was passed over the same absorbent as described in Example 1. This example is given to illustrate the activity of the absorbent over a long period of time. The feedstock was passed under a pressure of 1.5 MPa (15 bars), at a temperature of 24°C, and with a WHSV of 6 kg/kg.h. The arsine concentrations in the effluent are indicated in Table II. Day Arsine (ppb) 2 < 3 5 3 16 < 3 This example shows that even after 16 days the activity of the absorbent material remained very high, even though the feed contained water. Example 4 An absorbent material as described in Example 1 was prepared and stored under carbon dioxide during one month. The absorbent material was pretreated by passing a gaseous flow thereon, at a temperature of 180°C and under atmospheric pressure, said gaseous flow being formed first of nitrogen during 14 hours, then a mixture of nitrogen and hydrogen during a further 24 hours, the hydrogen concentration therein being increased by about 5 vol % per hour up to more than 95 vol %. The absorbent material was cooled under said flow of nitrogen and hydrogen, then purged free of hydrogen with a nitrogen flow. The absorbent material was then conditioned. A nitrogen flow was passed during 4 hours over the absorbent material, under atmospheric pressure, at a temperature of 20°C, and with a gaseous hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 125 l/l.h. During a further 12 hours, the conditioning was continued under the same conditions with nitrogen containing 1 vol % propylene. The purification procedure of Example 1 was repeated with the conditioned material. Results similar to Example 1 were obtained.

Claims: A process for removing arsine from a light olefin (C₂-C₆)-containing hydrocarbon feedstock, said process comprising the steps of : a) passing said feedstock over an absorbent material comprising nickel deposited on a support material wherein said nickel is present as both nickel oxide and metallic nickel, the total weight of said nickel oxide and metallic nickel representing up to about 80 wt% of the absorbent material, with the provision that metallic nickel does not represent less than 10 wt% nor more than 50 wt% of the absorbent; and b) recovering a hydrocarbon stream having a substantially reduced arsine content. The process of Claim 1 wherein the weight ratio of metallic nickel to nickel oxide is of 0.4 to 2.0, and the absorbent comprises from 30 to 60 wt% of support material. The process of either one of Claims 1 and 2 wherein said absorbent material has a specific surface area of from 100 to 200 m²/g. The process of any one of Claims 1 to 3 wherein the feedstock comprises more than 75% by weight of propylene, preferably from 85 to 99 wt% of propylene. The process of Claim 4 carried out at a temperature of from -10°C to 80°C, at a sufficient pressure to retain the feedstock in liquid phase, and at a WHSV of from 0.1 to 25 kg/kg.h. The process of any one of Claims 1 to 3 wherein the feedstock comprises more than 80 wt% of ethylene, preferably from 90 to 99 wt%. The process of Claim 6 carried out at a temperature of from -10°C to 80°C, at a pressure of at least 1 MPa, and at a WHSV of from 0.1 to 25 kg/kg.h. The process of either one of Claims 5 or 7 carried out at a temperature of from 10°C to 40°C and at a WHSV of from 1 to 10 kg/kg.h. The process of any one of Claims 1 to 8 wherein the absorbent material is previously conditioned by passing a flow of inert gas containing a minor amount of at least one light olefin. The process of Claim 9 wherein said light olefin in said inert gas is propylene in a concentration of from 0.1 to 5 vol %. The process of either one of Claims 9 or 10 wherein the absorbent material is pretreated prior to its conditioning by passing therethrough, at a temperature of 150 to 250°C and preferably under atmospheric pressure, a gaseous flow comprising first an inert gas, then a mixture of inert gas and hydrogen containing an increasing hydrogen concentration. The process of any one of Claims 1 to 11 wherein the arsine original concentration in the feed is of no more than about 70 parts per million by weight.

Inventors: BODART, PHILIPPE, DEBRAS, GUY
Applicants: FINA RESEARCH S.A.
Application year: 1987
Main classification: C07C7
IPC codes: C07C67, C10G29, C07C7, C07C1, C07C11, B01D15