MODULAR HOLLOW FLOOR PANELS WITH INTEGRAL DUCTING

Abstract: A modular panel, which in use is laid in a continuous two-dimensional array over a supporting sub-surface to form a hollow floor, wall or ceiling suitable for reticulating electrical, optic-fibre, hydraulic and other conduit. This is achieved by providing a panel having a plurality of channels (1), running in at least two directions. There are slits (2) between the channels which divide the panel into sub-elements interconnected by thin connections (3). This provides flexibility at a low height. These features were inadequate in the prior art.

Description: Modular hollow floor panels with integral ducting. Introduction This specification describes a modular, hollow floor panel whic when laid over a structural sub-floor, allows reticulation of electrical and communications cabling, without significantly i creasing the height of the finished floor level. It has a major application in automated office buildings, where the extensive use of computing and communications equipment has created a need to locate cabling throughout open office areas, and it is an alternative to the raised "access flooring" used in computer areas which has a depth of several *hundred millimetres Prior Art In current building practice the problem of within-the-floor cable access to points on an open-plan floor is solved by one of three methods : 1 in-floor ducted grids, which are typically cast into the floor slab, and consist of one-channel, two-channel or three-channel duct grids linked by cross-over boxes, and which have outlets provided at regular intervals. system. The ducts must be relatively widely spaced, and so the floor has limited cable-carrying capacity. cellular floors, which utilise hollow cells built into the floor slab. The cells are fitted with outlet boxes at regular intervals and cables are fed along the cells (or "raceways") from a "header trench" which sits flush with th floor and is typically located along a wall or a corridor. Examples are Australian patent no. 410,965 and US patent no. 2,445,197. These systems have a greater flexibility in the location of outlets, but cable access between two adjacent points along the floor is only possible by routing the cable up one cell, along the header trench, and down the adjacent cell. Recent developments have included the system described in Australian specifications 48,697/85 and 32,227/85. (Specification 48,697/85 describes a header-trench module and specification 32,227/85 describes a cellular raceway module.) This is a low-height floor laid onto the struc- tural slab, but is generically a cellular floor of the type described above, and suffers from the same disadvantages. raised access floors, which conventionally consist of 600mm x 600mm deck panels supported at each corner on adjustable- height pedestals. An example is Australian patent 462,745. Such floors provide optimum accessibility and cable capacity, but are expensive, and create difficulties becaus of their height. They also require some form of cable 1 guides to maintain order and to segregate power, telephone and data services. DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The purpose of this invention is to provide a low-height access floor which will allow both lateral and longitudinal cable acce to any point on the floor, and which has integral ducting which will provide continuous structural support to the deck, and a means of segregating services, and a means for creating orderly cable layouts . Whereas the primary application of the invention is to floors i buildings (and the descriptions herein assume this), it should understood that there are some situations where the system can b used on walls or ceilings (for example in sound studios) and so the invention is not limited to floor applications. The invention is now described with reference to the drawings, i which : figure 1 is a plan view of one corner of a segmented panel whic has a single-level cavity for the purpose of carrying services conduits; figure 2 shows a section A-A through figure 1; figure 3 is an isometric view of the panel shown in figures 1 and 2 ; " • figures 4 and 5 show alternative cross-sections A-A in which the panel is of composite construction; figure 6 is a plan view of one corner of a segmented panel which has a single-level cavity for the purpose of carrying • 5 services conduits, similar to the construction shown in figure 1, but assembled from triangular segments; figure 7 shows a section A-A through figure 6; figure 8 shows an alternative cross-section B-B with a floor finish in place: 10 * figure 9 is an isometric view of the panel shown in figures 6, 7 and 8 ; figure 10 is a plan view of one corner of a segmented panel which has triangular deck segments supported on a moulded base ; 15 figures 11, 12 and 13 show alternative cross-sections C-C through figure 10 ; figure 14 shows a relocatable floor panel with a services outlet mounted on the deck; figure 15 shows a method by which the floor panel system can be 2.0 intergrated with in-floor outlet boxes; 1 figure 16 shows a plan view of the corner of a panel with inter locking keys on the sides and two levels of cable cavities ; figure 17 shows a cross-section D-D through figure 16; 5 figures 18 and 19show plan views of panels which have diagonal cable channels in addition to orthogonal channels; figure 20 shows a part section through a panel with a services outlet located beneath the deck surface; figure 21 shows a plan-view of the panel shown in figure 20; " 10 figure 22 shows an isometric view of a panel with two sets of ducts, each perpendicular, and located one above the other; figure 23 shows a plan-view of the construction shown in figure 22; ■ c figure 24 shows a cross-section through a levelling tray which can be used in conjunction with panels of the type shown in figures 22, 23 and 25; figure 25 shows an isometric view of a panel base which has a series of upper ducts with continuous troughs, which 0 interconnect with ducts on the underside of the panel per ducts; figures 26 and 27 show details of two methods of connecting the deck to the base; and figure 28 shows a detail of one method of fixing the panel to th floor. The panel can take a number of forms. The first type of con¬ struction is illustrated in figures 1, 2 and 3, in which: fig 1 is a top view of a coner of the panel, fig 2 is a cross-section of the panel at line A-A, and fig 3 is an isometric projection of the panel. This panel has a flat upper surface, and the underside is criss¬ crossed with a series of "vaults" (1) which define channels through which the cabling may be laid. The channels occur in 5 at least two directions: a first set of channels runs laterally from one side of the panel to the other, and a second set of channels runs longitudinally from one end of the panel to the other. Diagonal and vertical channels are also possible, and formations with these features will be described later. J-. Between the said vaults, there are slits (2) which divide the panel into an array of rigid sub-elements in the form of pedestals, which are inter-connected by small cross-sections o material (3) . This allows the panel to flex and to accommodate undulations in the surface of the structural sub-floor. The inter-connections are shown as occurring on the upper surface the panel, but they may occur on the lower surface of the pane (see fig. 5) or at any point on the sides of the pedestal sub- elements . The vault size depends on the size of cable or conduit to be accommodated, but is limited by the rigidity of the bridge over the vault. In general a rigid construction material will allow wider vault spans and thinner bridge thickness (and hence thin¬ ner panel thickness) but an inelastic construction material is more susceptible to brittle fracture, noise transfer, and rock- ing on an uneven sub-floor surface. Figure 4 illustrates a variation in which a rigid plate (4) is incorporated in the upper surface of each sub-element. The pur pose of this is to increase the load-bearing capacity of the sub-element, and is applicable to panels formed from a semi-rigi base material such as a rubber compound. The plate is il¬ lustrated as being flat, but it may be ribbed, folded or curved to increase its structural rigidity and to improve the key to th base material. It may also be provided with one or more holes t facilitate the passage of cables through the surface of the panel. As an extension of the concept illustrated in fig 4, the upper material, and the lower portion of the legs constructed from a flexible material, thus providing the panel with a flexible base. This is illustrated in figure 5. In this construction the panel may be divided into rigid sub-elements as before, but the inter¬ connections between the segments may be provided within the flexible base material. The second type of construction is illustrated in figures 6, 7, and 9, in which: fig 6 is a top view of a coner of the panel, fig 7 is a cross-section of the panel along line B-B, fig 8 is a cross-section through an alternative constructio in which the floor finish is integral with the panel, and fig 9 is an isometric projection of the panel. This second type of construction differs from the first in that additional slits (5) are provided which divide the panel into triangular sub-elements (6). Triangular sub-elements have the advantage of accommodating to an uneven sub-surface, and this type of construction is applicable to the use of rigid materials such as pressed steel, cast aluminium, or rigid plastics. Figures 6 to indicate construction from a cast or moulded material such as aluminium or rigid plastic, in which each tria gular sub-element (6) has stiffening ribs (7) along its deck edges. As with other constructions the panel surface (or deck) may be provided with cable transit holes (9) . The panel construction illustrated in figure 8 has the floor finish (8) (in this case carpet) integral with the panel. As t floor finishing element is continuous, it can be utilised to inter-connect the panel sub-elements, and so in this case the previously described panel inter-connections (3) are not mandatory . It is possible to form this type of panel in the manner shown i figure 4, in which the panel is constructed from a resilient material, and has rigid stiffening plates incorporated in the upper surface of each triangular sub-element. It is also pos sible to form the panel in the manner of fig 5 in which deck se ments constructed from rigid material are provided with flexibl feet . A third type of construction is illustrated in figures 10, 11, and 13, in which: fig 10 is a top view of a coner of the panel, and fig 11, 12 and 13 are alternative cross-sections through t panel at line C-C. This panel construction comprises a lower section (10) with pil¬ lars (11) which locate and support a removable upper section (12). The lower section may be constructed from a rigid or a semi-rigid material such as i jection-moulded plastic, and it may be segmented to allow it to adapt to undulations in the struc¬ tural floor surface. The deck, which must be rigid across the spans between the pillars, may be continuous, or divided with flexible connections along the joints between each pillar (into for example square or triangular shapes), or it may consist of Q discrete sub-elements which may be individually removed or replaced - In the example shown in figure 11 the removable deck (12) is seg¬ mented into triangular sub-panels, each of which have clips which interlock with the pedestals (11). The deck segments are ' 2 attached to a flexible membrane. Figure 12 illustrates a slightly different form of construction in which the upper surface (12) of the panel is pinned or screwed to the lower section of the panel. Figure 13 shows an arrangement in which the deck segments are 0 formed with down-turns at each corner which engage into the pillars, which are hollow. It should be noted that figures 11, 12 and 13 merely illustrate three examples by which the upper and lower sections of the panel may be connected to one another. In all of the constructions described in this specification the deck may be attached to the base with other devices such as 'keys, clips, adhesive or "velcro strip; or the upper section may be loose-laid onto the lower section with optional horizontally engaging keys to prevent shea between the upper and lower sections. In use, the panels are laid on a structural sub-floor, and ca¬ bling is reticulated within the vaults of the panels from servic points on the building structure to the required location of th service outlet. At the required location of the service a fixed service point may be provided, for instance by coring through the panel deck to allow cable access, and attaching the outlet over the panel and fixing it through to the structural sub-floor Alternatively the service outlet may be incorporated into the panel itself. Figure 14 illustrates a panel which incorporate a service outlet (13) and a length of cable (14), which connects to a permanent service outlet. Such a panel may be located at some distance from the permanent service outlet, and can be at¬ tached permanently to the floor or it can be made removable, and this will allow it to be easily relocated. Figure 15 illustrates a permanent services point which is locate within the structural floor and which can be used in conjunction with the relocatable service panel illustrated in figure 14. In fig 15, the services connection points (15), (16) are located in a box (17) sunk into the structural floor. The box is provided with a rigid removable lid (17) which has cut-outs (18) at the edges to allow passage of the services cables from the panel vaults into the box itself. In floor tiling systems of the type described previously it may be desirable to interlock the panels, in order to p-revent verti¬ cal mis-alignment between adjacent panels, and to prevent incor¬ rect orientation in the case of panels which have asymmetrical duct locations . Figures 16 and 17 illustrate one means of achieving interlocking between panels, in which the side faces of the panels (19) have incorporated on them convex dimples (20) alternated with concave dimples (21). The panels will interlock if on abutting faces each convex dimple aligns with a corresponding concave dimple. Other forms of interlocking may be used to achieve this purpose, for example male-female connections of the form used to connect pieces in a jig-saw puzzle, or alternate snap-in plugs and sockets, or hooks which extend from alternate faces of each panel and engage in sockets formed in the body of the panel. The interlocking devices can be designed so as to allow in¬ dividual panels to be withdrawn from the body of the floor, for example by flexing of the panel to achieve a disengagement of the interlocking devices. Alternatively, in the case of panels with a detachable deck, the keys can be formed by offsetting the deck. The panel can in this case be removed by first disengaging the deck, and then extracting the base. Figures 1 and 4 illustrated a panel which comprises rigid sub- elements joined by thin connections (3) which will allow the panel to flex along the lines of the slits (2) . Figures 16 a 17 illustrate an arrangement in which in addition to the slits (24), small channels (25) may be formed in the upper surface of the panel, and this will create an alternative location for cabling. These channels should be narrow in cross-section to maximise the support to the overlying floor finish, but of suf¬ ficient size to allow the passage of small-diameter cable such as telephone wiring or optical fibre. This will allow these cables to be separated from cables underneath the panel by the body of the panel itself. The upper channels (25) may also be provided with overhangs (25a which will improve support to the floor finish and which will retain and protect any cabling in them. Additionally the upper channels may be provided with cover strip to protect the cabling and/or to support the overlying floor finish. Figure 17 illustrates a segment of one possible cover- strip arrangement, which allows alternate cable troughs to carry different services, and which provides physical separation of each service. In this arrangement, the lower cover (26) -which may for instanc carry telephone cabling - has set-downs (27) to allow the separated passage of another another cable network - for instanc data - and which can be protected by an upper cover (28) . Note region of the channel intersections to be deeper than in the areas away from the intersection (in this case over the vaults) Although figure 17 illustrates cover-stripping in a grid arrangement, it is of course possible to form the covers from simple extruded sections which can be cut to cover the cables as required. They may be " u" shaped in cross-section or they may for instance be flat (or slightly bowed) strips which engage in grooves or ledges on the sides of the channels. The channels and the covers may be marked or coloured to distin¬ guish the various cable networks that they are intended to contain . Whilst figure 17 illustrates a two-channel cover system, the principle can be extended to create three or more separated channel networks. It is also possible to delete the vaults (1) and the slits (24), so that all the cable channels will be lo¬ cated on the upper side of the panel. Although this will require the use of larger channel widths and structurally rigid cover strips, the arrangement will remove the need for access to the underside of the panels, which may then be glued to the floor . The panel may be provided with channels on the underside which are orthogonal to the sides of the panel, or diagonal to the sides of the panel, or both. Figure 18 is a view of the unde side of a panel with both orthogonal channels (28) and diagona channels (29) which intersect in areas (30) . Such a combinati of channels allows cables to be reticulated in various o directions, at 45 increments. It also permits cables to be turned about a larger radius of curvature than would be possib if there were no diagonal channels. There is a trade-off involved in this arrangement however - as t e span of the vaults is increased, the span over the interse tion of the vaults (30) becomes quite large, and this neces¬ sitates the use of thicker cross-sections and more rigid materials in order to achieve the required rigidity of the flooring surface. One means of reducing the arch spans is illustrated in figure 2 which is a plan view of a panel with an alternative vault configuration. In this arrangement the spacing between vaults has been increased, and both sets of vaults have been offset so that no more than two channels intersect at any one point. Thi decreases the maximum spans over the vault sections and thus al lows the use of thinner panel cross-sections and softer materia of manufacture. Note that in this arrangement the channels may be formed on either the underside of the panel, or on the upper side . A "service panel" was previously described (figure 12) which in¬ corporates a services outlet and which can be located at any position on the floor. A variation to this should be noted in which the service outlets are located within the body of the panel. Figure 21 is a section through part of such a panel, in which services outlets (31) are located in a cavity (32) which may be covered by a plate (33). With this and with the pre¬ viously designed panel the extension leads may be permanently wired into the outlet, or they may be detachable via plug connections. Considerations relating to these are described below. . j A services panel may also be designed to operate as a secondary terminal, to which services outlet panels can be connected. Figure 22 is a plan view of such a secondary terminal panel, in which cabling (34) is brought into a junction box (35), and thence to a connector (36), for instance a female pin-connector. - j _r The junction box and connectors may be integral, with the panel or separate from it, but it is preferable that they are contained within the thickness of the panel. Again with reference to figure 22, the secondary terminal panel may be provided with a cavity (37) in which plugs to the services outlet panel are 2 located. A removable segment or a cover-plate may be used in or over this cavity when a services outlet panel is not connected-. In order to comply with wiring regulations it may be necessary to ensure that intermediate connections in the wiring such as the 2 connection at the secondary terminal to the services outlet pane cannot be accidentally broken. Nevertheless it is desirable t use a removable plug as the means of connection, so that outlets may be relocated without requiring the assistance of an electrician . One means of securing the plug against accidental disconnection is to make the connecting plug or plugs the same size as the pl cavity (37) ; thus the abutting panel (38) will prevent the plug from being withdrawn. Alternatively, the connecting plugs may be screwed to the junction box, or inserted in a vertical axis that they will be restrained by the panel itself or by the flooring . Both the secondary terminal panel and the services outlet panel may be provided with thermal detectors, overload detectors and/or circuit breakers . A critical need of the various licencing authorities is that th various trunk cable networks within the floor-space are physi- cally separated from each other. When the networks run only i one direction (for instance perpendicular to the walls) and are thus parallel to each other, separation can be achieved by physi cal spacing of the panels, or by providing solid barriers betwee vaults or groups of vaults, so that in effect the channels run i only one direction. Such a "tunnel-vault" panel could have a cross-section similar in principle to eg figure 2, but of ex¬ truded construction. One means of allowing different cable networks to cross each "tunnel-vault" panel described above with a second set of chan¬ nels above the tunnel vaults, but at right-angles to them. Figures 23 (isometric projection) and 24 (plan view) show such construction, which has lower channels (40) and perpendicular upper channels (41), which are connected by holes or knock-out panels (42) . The holes or panels can be arranged so that each upper channel or group of channels can be uniquely linked to one or a group of lower channels. 10 In these illustrations there are shown two upper channels or ducts for every lower channel or duct. This arrangement has th advantage that the spans of the overlying deck are reduced, and it can be made thinner. A 2:1 ratio is not essential, however; 1:1 or a 1:2 ratio may be equally satisfactory from the point of 4. c view of cable distribution. This panel form can be constructed in a number of ways, for ex¬ ample by attaching two extrusions at right-angles, with per¬ manent or removable connections. The panel shown in figures 2 and 23 would be of in ection-moulded construction, with a 20 separate deck (43) . This deck may be loose-laid or permanently attached or removably attached, and it may be attached over its full area or at the centre or for example along one edge. It ma also incorporate the floor finish. In the case of a partially attached deck it may be provided with weakening grooves (44) ove 25 the supports or at right-angles to them which would enable it to flex upwards to provide access to the upper channels. The deck may also be fabricated with the upper channels (41) formed as vaults on its underside, so as to form two half-panels joined a the mid-line. This may allow the panels to be fabricated en¬ tirely from extruded sections. The panel shown in figure 23 may be permanently or removably a tached to the sub-floor. It is advantageous to glue it to the sub-floor around the centre of the panel, and in this case grooves (44), (45) may be provided through the walls of the lower vaults, to allow the panel to be curled upwards so as to allow access to the lower vaults from above. Removable areas (46) may be provided in the walls of the channel in non-structural areas to permit the passage of cables from one channel to the adjacent channel, to improve flexibility and to permit larger radii of curvature from the upper channels to the lower channels. In the case of a panel comprising a rigid deck and an injection- moulded base, it will be too rigid to adapt to undulations in th sub-floor. Small irregularities may be taken up by bedding the lower ribs in high-build adhesive (46), but in the case of a ver uneven sub-floor it may be advantageous to seat the panels in levelling trays. Such an arrangement is shown in figure 25, which shows a panel (48) seated in a levelling tray (47) . The ribs of the panel (49) are held between ribs (50) on the levell¬ ing tray, which provide support, and containment of levelling compound (51) . In all of the arrangements described in this document, the ca¬ bling may be introduced into the sub-flooring system in either which case the cable route must be exposed by lifting the deck or lifting the panel itself so that the cable can be laid, or alternatively the cable may be fed along its intended route, in which case the panel can remain undisturbed. The first method allows greater flexibility and the use of smaller and shallower cable channels , but the second method will minimise disruption to the room and the floor, and will allow the use of broadloom car¬ pet rather than removable tiles. The panel shown in figure 23 is fairly simple in construction, but it is difficult to feed wires along the upper channels, be¬ cause of the natural tendency of the wire to fall through the connecting hole into the lower channel. An improvement on this basic principle is shown in figure 26, which shows a moulded panel base to be used in conjunction with a removable deck, and perhaps with a levelling tray as shown in fig. 25. In this arrangement, sets of ducts are provided along three axes at right-angles to each .other. A lateral duct set 51, 52, 53 lies along the underside of the panel base, a longitudinal duct set 61 62, 63 lies along the upper side of the panel base at right angles to the lower ducts, and the vertical duct set 71, 72, 73 extends from the lower duct set, on each side of the upper horizontal ducts. Each duct set is made up of a number of sub-sets; preferably three in number, to carry power, telephone and data services respectively. Where a vertical duct abuts an upper horizontal duct of the sam sub-set, an opening occurs between the two ducts (which may tak the form of a knock-out panel) ; but where a vertical duct abuts an upper horizontal duct of a different sub-set, no opening occu s . Thus each lower duct sub-set is connected to the corresponding upper duct sub-set via a vertical duct, and by such selective in terconnections a series of physically separate duct networks ar created . In the example of figure 26 the upper duct (51) is dedicated to power cabling, and inter-connects with lower ducts of the same sub-set (61) via vertical ducts (71) to create a power conduit grid. Similarly, duct sub-sets 52, 62, 72 form a telephone con duit grid, and duct sub-sets 53, 63, 73 form a data conduit grid . It will be seen that in addition to the major advantage of this arrangement that cables can be fed along the upper ducts with less risk of deflecting into the lower ducts, a number of fur¬ ther advantages accrue. Firstly, the arrangement provides regular access to each lower duct to enable control of cable feeding without the need to lift all or part of the panel. Secondly, the arrangement allows greater turning radii, of the the vertical ducts provide superior access to services outlets on the deck above the panel. Although figure 26 shows three sets of ducts (for power, _- telephone and data), this number may of course be varied. In addition, there may be several levels of horizontal ducts. Advantages can be gained by providing four layers of horizontal ducts, with the upper two layers having narrow and closely spaced ducts to reduce distances between possible services out- Q let points, and with the lower two layers having wide ducts to maximise cable carrying capacity and bending radii. Alternatively the panel may be constructed with a level dedicate to each service. This will remove the need for dividing ribs, and will permit cables to be run in any direction on their par- 1 c ticular level, thus allowing shorter cable runs. By utilising the sides of the panel base shown in figure 26, ex¬ tending clips may be formed to attach the floor decking to the panel. Figure 27 illustrates in detail the clips (80) which may be provided on the edges of the panel in figure 26. These clips 20 can be disengaged from the decking panel to allow its temporary removal, and if they are asymmetrical on each side (eg, of dif¬ ferent heights or in different relative locations) the decking will be unable to be mis-oriented when it is replaced. This will allow the decking to have pre-formed outlets, or to be 25 marked with the locations of the services ducts in the panel underneath, so that services can be accessed through drilled holes without the need to remove the panel. Figure 28 shows an alternative method of attaching the deck to the base, in which the base has formed on it, hollow upstands (84) which when a peg or screw (83) is inserted into them, expa against the deck (82). Other forms of attachment are also possible, such as screw-fixi into the base, or variations of figure 28 in which the peg (83) is formed integral with the upstand (84), to create a form of snap-lock . Figure 29 shows a method of forming the base of the ribs so as increase the surface area of the tile which bears onto the sub- floor, in which the rib has a foot (85) . It should be noted that in constructions which have a foot or bearing pad, it is also possible to form thickened ribs, or double ribs which then connect to each side of the foot, rather than to the centre. These constructions have the advantage of creating column-like elements which are superior in transferring load from the deck the sub-floo . figure 30 shows a transition piece which enables one area of floor which is laid with upper ducts running in one direction to be connected with another section of floor in which the upper ducts run at right-angles. It is laid in a line along the junc¬ tion of the two areas, and in the orientation shown in figure 30 the lower edge of the sloping trays (91) fits against the lower ducts (61) , (62) , (63) of the floor panel. It can, however, be mounted upside-down to create a joint-line along the adjacent face of the panels.

Claims: 1 A modular panel, which in use is laid in a continuous two- dimensional array over a supporting sub-surface to form a hollow floor, wall or ceiling suitable for reticulating _- electrical, optic-fibre, hydraulic and other conduit, and which comprises : . an upper load-bearing deck, bearing onto a plurality of pillars, ribs or similar structural support elements; said structural support elements forming an intersti- 4. rs tial duct zone between said deck and said supporting sub-surface; said structural support elements defining two or more sets of channels within the duct zone, in which: . one set of channels extends laterally from one side of the panel to the other, and is located within the panel so as to align with corresponding channel sets in abut¬ ting panels ; . another set of channels extends longitudinally from one end of the panel to the other, and is located within 20 the panel so as to align with corresponding channel sets in abutting panels; and in which channels of the first set interconnect with channels in the other channel set or sets to enable conduit to be routed from one direction to another direction within 25 the said duct cavity. A continuous floor, wall or ceiling surface or sub-surface constructed from a two-dimensional array of panels of the type defined in claim 1. A formation as defined in claim 1 or claim 2, in which the component panel is formed from an array of segments in the form of pedestals, in which each pedestal has: . a load-bearing upper surface which collectively forms the deck of the panel, and . legs at each corner of the pedestal; and in which each said pedestal segment is flexibly con¬ nected to the abutting segments to form a flexible panel capable of adapting to an undulating structural sub-surface A formation as defined in claim 3, in which the said pedes¬ tal segments are of composite construction, each having a rigid deck element and less-rigid supporting elements. A formation as defined in claim 3 or claim 4, in which each said pedestal segment has a rectangular plan-form. A formation as defined in claim 3 or claim 4, in which each said pedestal segment has a triangular plan-form. 7 A formation as defined in claim 1 or claim 2, in which the component panel includes an underlying base member on which the said structural support elements are wholly or partially formed as projections. 8 A formation as defined in claim 7 in which the said base member is flexible and. the deck is formed from rigid seg¬ ments each spanning between said structural support elements, and each segment flexibly attached to the abutting segments so as to form a flexible panel capable of adapting to undulations in the supporting sub-surface. A formation as defined in claim 3 or claim 4, in which each said deck segment has a rectangular plan-form. 10 A formation as defined in claim 3 or claim 4, in which each said deck segment has a triangular plan-form. 11 A formation as defined in any preceding claim in which one array of channel sets is located on the underside of the panel and opens downwards, and another array of channel sets is located on the upper side of the panel and opens upwards. 12 A formation as defined in any preceding claim in which in there is defined one or more sets of channels which are diagonal to the said lateral and longitudinal channel sets 13 A formation as defined in claim 1 or claim 2, in which in the component panel the said interstitial duct zone is c horizontally divided into an upper and a lower duct zone, which : . the upper duct zone is partititioned by continuous lo gitudinal ribs to form a set of ducts running from on end of the panel to the other; 0 • the lower duct zone is partititioned by continuous lateral ribs to form a set of ducts running from one side of the panel to the other; . each upper and lower duct set is comprised of one or more sub-sets of ducts which in use are dedicated to 5 particular services, such as electric power, telephon and data, and in which each upper duct opens downward into each lowe duct of the corresponding subset, but is closed off from a ducts of other sub-sets. 0 14 A formation as defined in claim 13 in which the openings b tween the upper and lower ducts are in the form of knock-o panels . 15 A formation as defined in claim 1 or claim 2, in which in divided into: . a lower duct zone which is partitioned by continuous lateral ribs to form a set of ducts running from one r; side of the panel to the other; and . an upper duct zone which is partitioned by continuous longitudinal ribs to form a set of ducts running from one end of the end of the panel to the other; and within this upper duct zone, 10 • sets of vertical ducts which are located on each side of the upper longitudinal ducts and which open directl onto the lower lateral ducts ; and in which each of the lateral, longitudinal and vertical duct sets is comprised of one or more sub-sets of ducts 15 which in use are dedicated to particular services, such as electric power, telephone and data; and in which: . each vertical duct opens directly onto the correspond¬ ing lower duct; . there is no vertical opening between the lower lateral 20 ducts and the upper longitudinal ducts; and . where a vertical duct of one subset abuts an upper lon¬ gitudinal duct of the same sub-set, it opens laterally onto the said longitudinal duct via a hole or a knock¬ out panel, but where a vertical duct abuts a lon- 25 gitudinal duct of a different sub-set, there is no opening. 16 A formation as defined in claim 14 or claim 15, in which th number of sub-sets in each duct set is three. 17 A formation as defined in claim 14, 15 or 16, in which the the deck is removably attached with wedging devices integra with the base. 18 A formation as defined in claim 14, 15, 16 or 17, in which there is formed between the ducts, a number of thichened ribs or twin-rib constructions forming structural pillars, which in use transfer load from the deck to the supporting sub-surf ce . 19 A formation as defined in claim 14, 15, 16, 17 or 18, in which the component panel is supported on a tray, which ha vertical ribs which engage the lower lateral ribs of the panel base, and which in use accommodates undulations in th supporting sub-surface. 20 A formation as defined in any preceding claim, in which the sides of the component panel are provided with interlocking keys, so that in use, incorrect orientation of abutting panels is prevented, and vertical mis-alignment is eliminated. 21 A formation as defined in any preceeding claim, in which th componen pane as moun e on or n , a serv ces ou ¬ let which in use connects into the services reticulated within the panel assembly. A formation as defined in claim 21, in which said services outlet is attached to a relocatable component of the assembly. A device for use with formations defined in claims 13 to 20, comprising a series of ramped ducts which in use provide a transition between upper channel sets and lower channel sets, and vice versa. A formation as defined in claim 1 or claim 2, comprising a multi-level cable distribution system which has three- dimensional grids of duct sets in which the vertical ducts are laterally displaced from the upper horizontal ducts to allow the formation of continuous ducts both horizontally and vertically within the assembly.

Inventors: BOYD MICHAEL DAVID, BOYD, MICHAEL, DAVID
Applicants: BOYD MICHAEL DAVID, BOYD, MICHAEL, DAVID
Application year: 1987
Main classification: E04B5
IPC codes: E04B5, E04F15, H02G3