HIGH POWER SELF-REGULATING HEATER

Abstract: An improved performance ferromagnetic self-­ regulating heater. Constant alternating current is applied to a layered structure including at least one ferromagnetic layer. One or more layers of non-magnetic material is added to the ferromagnetic layer in such a way that the power factor of the heater is very sig­ nificantly increased above its value in the absence of at least one of the layers. The alternating current flows through the different layers in varying quantities depending on layer composition, temperature and Curie point of the ferromagnetic layer. The structure generates heat by resistive heating as a function of the power applied. In one embodiment a single layer of non-­ magnetic, high-resistance material is in intimate electrical and thermal contact with one surface of the ferromagnetic material. Below the effective Curie temperature of the ferromagnetic layer the current is mainly confined in the non-magnetic layer which heats with greater efficiency due to better resistive and impe­ dance characteristics. In a second embodiment a further non-magnetic, low-resistance layer is added to the opposite surface of the ferromagnetic material. Here the majority of the current is switched from the high-­ resistance to the low-resistance layer as the heater approaches effective Curie. By these means impedance matching circuit losses can be substantially reduced and energy is saved in high power systems based on the power factor.

Description: The present invention relates to ferromagnetic self-regulating heaters. More particularly, the present invention relates to ferromagnetic self-regulating heaters with secondary performance enhancing layers. This application relates to autoregulating ferromagnetic heaters of the type described in U.S. Patent No. 4,256,945 to Carter and Krumme. These autoregulating heaters using a high resistivity, high permeability magnetic surface layer on a non-magnetic low resistivity substrate have been developed to a point where they are useful in a variety of applications. Their successful operation depends on their ability to contain the current in the magnetic surface layer which is also the heating layer since it has a high resistivity. Thus a magnetic surface layer having both high permeability and high resistivity is required. It must also have the proper Curie temperature for the intended application. One disadvantage of this scheme is that at high power levels the magnetic fields in the surface magnetic layer may be very high, in some applications of the order of may oersteds, causing the effective permeability to be relatively low due to saturation. Also, the power factor (PF) of the impedance of the magnetic surface layer heaters described above is relatively low, e.g., 0.7 at temperatures below Curie, leading to the necessity of using reactive power factor correction elements in the tuning circuit. The power factor behaviour shows the approach of the power factor to a maximum value of .707 as the magnetic layer thickness increases. The present invention provides a means for overcoming the above restrictions by adding a further layer of material. Many improvements occur from this additional layer; high power factor below Curie, simplifying impedance matching; more flexibility in the overall design, including the requirements on the magnetic layer; higher effective permeability in the magnetic layer; a broad frequency range over which good performance, i.e., high self-regulation (S/R) ratio and high power factor are maintained. The self-regulation (S/R) ratio is an important parameter in autoregulating heater design. This ratio refers to the ratio of overall resistance of the heater below effective Curie to the heater resistance above effective Curie. This change in resistance coupled with a constant current causes the heater to generate dramatically less heat for a given amount of current when the temperature of the heater is above Curie. Therefore, the magnitude of the S/R ratio determines the effectiveness of autoregulation. Jackson and Russell in U.S. Patent No. 2,181,274 use a sheath of non-magnetic material (they suggest brass) on a magnetic material base. They couple to this structure inductively. Conditions for maximum efficiency, or maximum power factor, or the best possible combination of efficiency and power factor are disclosed. Jackson does not claim an ohmicly connected heater nor mention self-regulation. Jackson's approach which uses low frequencies does not mention or use Curie temperature self-regulation and does not appear to take advantage of the improved effective permeability of the ferromagnetic material; a factor of great importance in effective autoregulation. As has already been indicated, autoregulating heaters may consist of a ferromagnetic layer and a non-magnetic highly electrically conductive low electrical resistance layer in contiguity. An example of this is to be found in the present applicants' WO 84/04698 which provides heater constructions specifically for the heat treatment of fluids. Another prior art arrangement is to be found in the applicants' EP-A1-0110692 which teaches a three-layer structure consisting of two ferromagnetic layers of different Curie temperatures and a nonmagnetic highly electrically conductive low electrical resistance layer, especially of copper. According to the present invention, there is provided an autoregulating electrical resistance heater comprising a layer of ferromagnetic material adapted to be connected across a source of substantially constant alternating current whereby the heater temperature autoregulates at a level determined by the effective Curie temperature of the ferromagnetic material, characterised in that there is applied to at least one current-carrying face of the ferromagnetic layer in intimate electrical and thermal contact therewith a layer of non-magnetic material which is electrically conductive but of high electrical resistivity, whereby below Curie a substantial proportion of the current flows in the non-magnetic layer and the power factor of the two -layer combination is higher than that of the ferromagnetic layer alone. The magnetic properties of the ferromagnetic material in combination with the high frequency current source create a skin effect which confines a large portion of the current to a narrow depth at the surface of the structure. In the absence of the high-resistance, non-magnetic surface layer, the majority of the current would thus be confined to a narrow surface portion of the ferromagnetic layer. The power factor and heating would therefore be determined to a great extent by the resistivity and reactance of that portion of the ferromagnetic material in which the majority of the current flows. When the non-magnetic surface layer is added to the structure, a majority of current flow may be shifted to that layer by the skin effect. By selecting a material with more desirable resistance and reactance characteristics for the surface layer, the power factor for resistive heating of the whole structure can be enhanced. The ferromagnetic material has an effective Curie temperature at which it becomes essentially non-magnetic. As this temperature is reached, the skin effect diminishes and therefore the current is more evenly distributed throughout the whole structure including the ferromagnetic layer through which a greater portion of the current now flows. At all times the total current into the structure is maintained at an essentially constant level. By maintaining a constant supply of current while increasing the cross-sectional area through which the current now flows, a decrease in the quantity of resistive heating is produced. Therefore autoregulation about a predetermined effective Curie temperature is accomplished. The term "constant current" and other like terms as employed herein and used to refer to current supplied to the structure, does not mean a current which cannot increase but means a current that obeys the following formula: Specifically, in order to autoregulate, the power delivered to the load when the heater exceeds Curie temperature must be less than the power delivered to the load below Curie temperature. If the current is held invariable, then the best autoregulation ratio is achieved short of controlling the power supply to reduce current. So long as the power is reduced sufficiently to reduce heating below that required to maintain the temperature above the effective Curie temperature, the current can be allowed to increase somewhat and autoregulation is still achieved. Thus, when large autoregulating ratios are not required, constraints on the degree of current control may be relaxed; reducing the cost of the power supply. Preferably, the resistance of the non-magnetic high resistance layer is in the range of 60 to 5,000 microhm-cm. Materials having an appropriate resistivity include electroless nickel, nichrome alloys and electrically-conductive polymers. In a second embodiment, a single ferromagnetic layer has a high-resistive, non-magnetic layer on one face and a low-resistance, non-magnetic layer on the opposite face. The ferromagnetic layer then acts as a switch utilising the skin effect whereby the major portion of the current flows through the high-resistance layer when the temperature is below the effective Curie temperature but the major portion of the current flows through the low-resistance layer above Curie. At no time does a major portion of the current flow through the ferromagnetic layer. This second configuration enables the heater to utilise the high power factor available from use of the high-resistance layer when maximum resistive heating is needed below effective Curie. Also resistive heating is severely diminished when the majority of current flow is switched to the low-resistance layer, allowing for enhanced autoregulation. The usual considerations relating to the design of a ferromagnetic self-regulating heater apply here including the width to thickness ratio of a non-enclosed magnetic path (approx. 50:1) where the high mu of the ferromagnetic material is to be maintained at or near its maximum value. Inductive means can be used to couple the AC source to the heater. The structure must be designed to obtain the desired, improved, power factor at the same time maintaining other needed heater properties such as a reasonable self-regulation power ratio. The addition of the resistive layer does lower the self-regulation ratio. In most cases this is no problem since a sufficient ratio is still attainable. The addition of the resistive layer may reduce the heater resistance at temperatures below the Curie temperature, but not seriously enough to be considered a tradeoff problem. The heater's properties, i.e., power factor and self-regulation ratio, depend upon a chosen set of layer parameters, i.e., permeability, resistivity, dielectric constant, and thickness, and upon the chosen AC frequency; usually in the MHz range. The tradeoffs among power factor, self-regulation ratio, and resistance level R s depend upon the particular design goals. This disclosure does, however, teach the design principles sufficient to build an improved autoregulating heater for any application. Arrangements according to the invention will now be described in more detail, by way of example, and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 is a side sectional view of a preferred embodiment of a two-layer version of the present invention. Figure 2 is a side sectional view of a modification of the two-layer arrangement of Figure 1. Figure 3 is a cross-sectional view of the layers of the arrangement shown in Figure 2. Figure 4 is a side sectional view of a preferred embodiment of a three-layer version of the present invention. Figure 5 is a graph illustrating the current density of a two-layer heater below and above Curie as a function of the distance from the surface of the heater at an alternating current frequency of 10 MHz. Figure 6 is a graph illustrating the current density of a two-layer heater below and above Curie as a function of the distance from the surface of the heater at an alternating current frequency of 2 MHz. Figure 7 shows curves illustrating the relationship between autoregulating ratio (S/R) and power factor (PF) as a function of outer resistive layer thickness. Figure 8 shows curves illustrating the relation between resistive layer thickness, magnetic layer thickness and S/R. Figure 9 shows curves illustrating the effect of the ratio of resistivity to layer thickness on S/R. Figure 10 is a graph illustrating the effect of supply current frequency on PF, S/R and surface layer resistance (R s ). Figures 11 A and B are side and cross-sectional views of a test embodiment to the present invention. Figure 12 is a graph illustrating the below Curie performance of the test heater of Figures 11A and 11B. Figure 13 is a graph illustrating resistance as a function of temperature of the test heater at different frequencies. Figure 14 is a graph illustrating the ratio of resistances at different temperatures as a function of frequency. Figure 15 is a graph illustrating resistance and reactance as a function of temperature at a fixed current frequency of 13.65 MHz. Figure 16 is a cross-sectional view of an alternative configuration of the embodiment of Figures 3 and 4. Figure 17 is a graph illustrating S/R, R s , and PF as a function of resistive surface layer thickness for the device of Figure 16. The graphs illustrated in Figure 5-10 and 17 are based on calculated rather than experimental data. The first embodiment of the present invention, as illustrated in Figure 1, comprises a layer of ferromagnetic material 2 surrounded by a non-magnetic high-resistance surface layer 1. A high frequency alternating current source 10 is connected across the two layers in parallel. Heat is generated by resistive heating as a function of power supplied to the layers. The magnetic properties of the ferromagnetic material 2 in combination with the high frequency current source 10 creates a "skin effect". As detailed in U.S. Patent 4,256,945 to Carter and Krumme, the "skin effect" is characterised by alternating currents concentrated more heavily in the surface regions of the conductor than in the interior volume thereof. The high concentration of current at the surface region of the conductor is more pronounced the higher the frequency. However, from what follows it is also obvious that the skin effect is dependent upon the magnetic permeability of the conductor. In a "thick" conductor having a planar surface and a thickness T, energised by an alternating current source connected to produce a current parallel to the surface, the current density under the influence of the skin effect can be shown to be an exponentially decreasing function of the distance from the surface of the conductor. j (x) = j 0 e -x/s where j (x) is the current density in amperes per sq. meter at a distance x in the conductor measured from the surface, j₀ is the current magnitude at the surface, and s is the "skin depth" which in mks units is given by: s = √ 2/µσω , for T > > s. Where µ is the permeability of the material of the conductor, σ is the electrical conductivity of the material of the conductor and ω is the radian frequency of the alternating current source. In discussing the relationship of the skin effect to the magnetic properties of materials, it is convenient to talk in terms of the relative permeability µ r , where µ r is the permeability normalised to µ v , the permeability of vacuum and µ v = 4π x 10⁻⁷ henry/meter. Thus, µ r = µ/µ v = µ/4 πX 10⁻⁷. For non-magnetic materials, µ r = 1. The foregoing relationship of current density as a function of distance from the surface, although derived for a thick planar conductor, also holds for circular cylindrical conductors having a radius of curvature much larger than the skin depth s. In the absence of the non-magnetic surface layer 1, the majority of the current would be confined to a narrow surface portion of the ferromagnetic layer 2. The power factor would therefore be determined by the resistivity and permeability of that portion of the ferromagnetic material 2 in which the majority of the current flows. When the non-magnetic surface layer 1 is added to the structure and the thickness of layer 1 is properly chosen the majority of current flow is shifted to layer 1 by the skin effect. By selecting a material with more desirable resistivity and permeability characteristics for the surface layer as opposed to the layer 2, the power factor for resistive heating of the whole structure can be enhanced. The ferromagnetic material 2 has an effective Curie temperature at which it becomes essentially non-magnetic. As this temperature is reached, the skin effect diminishes and therefore the current is more evenly distributed throughout the whole structure including the ferromagnetic layer 2 through which a greater portion of the current now flows. At all times the total current into the structure is maintained at an essentially constant level. By maintaining a supply of constant current while increasing the cross-sectional area through which the current will now flow there is a decrease in the quantity of resistive heating produced. Therefore autoregulation about a predetermined effective Curie temperature is accomplished. The relative resistivities of the layers must also be considered since the layer may be selected to have a higher resistivity than layer 2. An ohmic connection which permits the use of flat layers is illustrated in Figures 2 and 3. The a.c. source 10 is connected between one end of the ferromagnetic layer 5 and the same or proximal end of a strap conductor 6 which overlies the non-magnetic layer 4 and is united to the distal end of that layer. A layer of insulation 3 is interposed between the non-magnetic layer 4 and the conductor 6. In an alternative embodiment shown in Figure 4, a single ferromagnetic layer 8 is covered by an outer high-resistive, non-magnetic layer 7 and an inner low-resistance, non-magnetic layer 9. The ferromagnetic layer 8 acts as a switch to direct the major portion of the current to the high-resistance region 7 when below the effective Curie temperature or through the low-resistance layer 9 above Curie. At no time does a significant portion of the current flow through the ferromagnetic layer 8. This configuration enables the heater to utilize the high power factor available from the high-resistance layer 7 when maximum resistive heating is needed below effective Curie. Also resistive heating is severely diminished when the majority of current flow is switched to the low-resistance layer 9. At temperatures below Curie due to the skin effect produced by magnetic layer 8 and the frequency of the current, a substantial fraction of the AC current flows in the resistive surface layer 7, producing a relatively high power factor. As the temperature approaches Curie the decline in permeability of the magnetic layer 8 is no longer effective in maintaining this current distribution, the current now flows mainly in the underlying layer 9 where significantly less heat is generated due to the low resistance of this layer. The usual considerations relating to the design of a ferromagnetic self-regulating heater apply here including the width to thickness ratio considerations for the ferromagnetic material design to avoid demagnetising effects if flat layers are used and a return path is provided. For the case of a thick (t >>s) magnetic layer 2, as illustrated in Figure 1, current distribution calculations are shown in Figures 5 and 6. The graphs, which are plots of relative current density i(x)/i(o) against depth (x) below the surface, illustrate how the quantity of current diminishes at distances farther from the surface of the heater. The below Curie curves 12 and 14 illustrate the case of a ½ mil (.013mm) thick layer of 60 microhm-cm material on a substrate of magnetic material having a below Curie permeability of µ₂ = 300. The corresponding above Curie curves are shown at 11 and 13. The current density magnitude is almost uniform in the resistive layer at both frequencies, 2MHz and 10MHz, and both below and above Curie. For the two-layer case (Figure 1) the calculated integrated currents I₁ and I₂ in the non-magnetic and magnetic layers, respectively, and both below and above Curie, are also shown (as the ratio I₂/I₁) in Figures 5 and 6. In both cases, below Curie most of the current is in the resistive layer 1 while above Curie most of the current is in the magnetic layer 2 by a large factor. Table I lists the electrical properties of a heater based on the configuration of Figure 1. Surface impedance R s + jX s , self-regulation ratio (S/R) and power factor (PF) are tabulated for several values of magnetic material permeability µ₂ ranging from 200 to 1. This range of permeabilities is not too different from those found in Alloy 42, Invar 36 and other nickel iron alloys having Curie temperatures in the 60°C to 400°C range. The value of resistivity þ₂ of the magnetic layer, 75 x 10⁻⁶ ohm-cm, is close to the value for Alloy 42 and several other nickel-iron alloys. The two values of resistivity þ₁ chosen for the non-magnetic layer correspond respectively to materials such as austenitic stainless steel and nichrome. According to Table I, the power factor is increased to near unity for high values of permeability and proper layer thicknesses; see the various graphs of Figures 7-9 and 17. Accordingly with proper design of the heater geometry, the input impedance is almost purely resistive and can be made almost any desired value in most cases; thus impedance matching circuitry is eliminated. Table I also shows that increasing the resistivity of the surface layer 1 from 60 to 100 microhm-cm causes the power factor at 100 microhm-cm and µ₂ = 200 to decrease only slightly below its value at 60 microhm-cm, and causes the self-regulation ratio ( at µ₂ = 1) to improve by 40 percent over the 60 microhm-cm case. This is an important tradeoff. Table II presents calculations of surface impedance, power factor, and self-regulation ratio for the single magnetic layer without the resistive layer. A better self-regulation ratio is achieved, but the power factor is much worse at µ₂ = 200 and the heater will require impedance matching to efficiently couple it to the power supply. It is also noted, referring again to Table I, that the power factor is always better with the resistive layer, with only one exception; the µ₂ = 1, þ₁ = 100 microhm-cm value of power factor, 67.5%, is slightly worse than the µ = 1 power factor, 68.9%, in Table II. The usefulness of a resistive layer in a multilayer heater configuration is illustrated in Table III and Figure 4 where a non-magnetic top layer 7 is combined with a second layer 8 of temperature sensitive magnetic material on a highly conductive non-magnetic substrate 9. The top layer 7 might be a non-magnetic stainless steel, the second layer 8 might be Alloy 42, and the third layer 9 might be copper. The first set of four calculations are for Þ₁ = 60 microhm-cm. The second set is for Þ₁ = 10²⁰, thus simulating the absence of the top layer. Again, in all cases except µ₂ = 1, the power factor with the third layer is very substantially improved, again at some expense in self-regulation ratio (S/R). Referring again to Figures 5 and 6, we note that the embodiment of Figure 1 yields S/R regulation ratios of 11.0 and 6.7 at 2MHz and 10MHz respectively. The 10MHz above Curie temperature power factor (PF) is slightly better, i.e., .98, than the 2MHz power factor value, .94. This is achieved at the expense of a smaller regulation ratio. Without the resistive layer this heater would have a regulation ratio equal to 17.3. Thus by proper choice of thickness and surface resistivity, one can achieve a substantial increase in power factor with only a modest reduction in S/R. The second embodiment, illustrated in Figure 4, incorporates a third, low resistivity, low permeability layer 9 on the opposite surface of the magnetic layer 8. Below Curie, a substantial fraction of the current will flow in the high-resistive surface layer 7 (due to skin effect). Above Curie, most of the current will flow in the third, low resistivity layer 9. Calculations of the surface resistances and the self-regulation ratio (S/R) show that much of the current flows in this third layer 9 when above Curie. There are many design parameters to choose in the three-layer system. Two qualitatively different modes of operation are possible which offer benefits and advantages. In the first mode, Mode A, the magnetic layer thickness is between one skin depth and several skin depths. In the other mode, Mode B, the magnetic layer thickness is in the range of 1 / 3 to 2 / 3 of a skin depth. These are discussed in turn below. Figure 7 depicts in Mode A, the S/R and PF as a function of non-magnetic resistive layer 7 thickness t₇ for the case, at f = 13.56MHz, where the magnetic layer 8 thickness t₈ is approximately 0.3 mils (.0076mm) in the chosen material, or roughly 1.5 skin depths. In this case (and in cases where the magnetic layer is still thicker) the S/R is a monotonically declining function of resistive layer 7 thickness t₇ and the power factor is a monotonically increasing one. In addition to the solid line curves for resistivity þ₇ = 1000 microhm-cm, Figure 7 includes calculations for two different values of non-magnetic resistive layer resistivity, þ₇ = 100 microhm-cm and 200 microhm-cm. The two curves fall practically on top of one another when, as shown here, the scale for the þ₇ = 100 thickness axis (t₇) is expanded as compared with þ₇ = 200, i.e., t₇ (þ₇= 100) = ½t₇ (þ₇ = 200). The same result is obtained by plotting, on the same basis, values for resistivity, þ₇ = 50. The physical significance of the identical behaviour of the several cases under this transformation is that the resistance of the non-magnetic layer 7 remains the same. Another way of stating this is that the ratio of the layer thickness to the layer resistivity is maintained constant while changing both parameters, i.e., t₇/þ₇ = constant is a transformation rule that allows modification of these two parameters without changing the electrical characteristics of the device. This is a special case of the general rule for the three-dimensional case for which the rule is ℓ ²/þ = constant where ℓ is the "scale" of the configuration (in our one-dimensional case the linear dimension, i.e. t₇, is not squared). The usefulness of this "A" mode, in which the magnetic layer thickness is greater than about 1.5 skin depths, is at the higher frequencies where a thin magnetic layer would be difficult to achieve, for instance by roll cladding or sputtering. Large S/R ratios (90) are achievable coincident with high below-Curie power factors, e.g., greater than 0.9. MODE B. In this mode the magnetic layer is made less than one skin depth thick. The addition of a non-magnetic resistive surface layer 7 causes the S/R to increase initially with resistive layer 7 thickness t₇, reaching a maximum value beyond which increasing the resistive layer 7 thickness t₇ causes the S/R to decline in a manner similar to that of Mode A. Figure 8 illustrates this behaviour for three different magnetic layer 8 thicknesses t₈. Very high values of S/R are attainable with magnetic layer thicknesses less than one skin depth (δ). This behaviour demonstrates that the switching action discussed above for Mode A operation also applies to Mode B. Mode B operation should be especially applicable at lower frequencies where a thin magnetic layer 8 in terms of δ is desirable. Figure 9 depicts S/R ratio and power factor vs. resistive layer thickness for a .15 mil (.0038mm) thick magnetic layer demonstrating that high S/R ratios can be achieved using a wide range of resistivities in the resistive layer 7. It also shows that, for the lower values of resistivity, equivalent performance is realised by maintaining the ratio of the resistive layer 7 thickness t₇ to resistivity constant. In this last respect it is similar to Mode A operation. Mode B operation is not as good as Mode A from the standpoint of power factor. To attain a .9 power factor, Mode A would yield an S/R of approximately 100 while Mode B would have an S/R of about 55. Figure 10 illustrates the behaviour of a "Mode A" design as a function of frequency. Figure 10 shows that a frequency in the general range of 10 - 40MHz would be desirable for this design. In this range the power factor is higher than .9, the surface resistance R s is adequately high and the S/R greater than 50. The S/R decreases with decreasing frequency at the low end of the band because the magnetic layer is becoming too thin in terms of δ's to effectively switch the current. Figure 11A illustrates a test fixture of an inductively energised embodiment of the present invention. A .0005" (.013mm) thick layer of electroless nickel 15 was deposited on a .345" (8.76mm) diameter cylinder of annealled TC30-4 alloy 17 along a length of 3.75" (95.3mm). This plating forms a two-layer cylindrical heater 16. A twenty-seven turn helical coil 18 was wound on this layered cylinder 16 to provide a means for inductively energising the heater with high frequency alternating current. The coil is comprised of Kapton-insulated 19 rectangular wire 20, .0035" (.089mm) by .040" (1.02mm), the cross-section of which is shown in Figure 11B. The turns were wound as tightly as practical on the cylinder 16 and as close together as practical in order to minimise magnetic field leakage reactance and thus achieve the optimum power factor. Measured small signal room temperature impedance properties of this test circuit are illustrated in Figure 12, confirming expected below Curie high power factor properties. The slight reduction in PF at frequencies above about 20MHz is due to the capacitance between coil turns. Of note is the slow variation of the impedance as a function of frequency, a property useful in heater design. From 2MHz to 20MHz the resistance varies by only 40 percent. Figure 13 depicts the measured resistance as a function of temperature at several different frequencies and between 0°C and 70°C. These measurements were made through a short length of cable, with the test heater mounted inside the environmental test chamber and the vector impedance meter outside it. The measured impedances were corrected for the effect of the cable. Figure 14 illustrates the ratio of the 0°C and 70°C resistances as a function of frequency. Referring to Figure 12, a tradeoff between high power factor and high resistance ratio exists. The maximum resistance ratio is equal to the square root of the permeability and occurs with a zero thickness resistive layer. The small signal permeability of TC30-4 is about 400 (from previous measurements). The maximum resistance ratio is therefore about 20, and as expected is higher than when a resistive layer is added. The data of Figure 15 demonstrate that the resistive layer carries most of the RF current, and that consequently the effective permeability of the magnetic material is higher under high power conditions than in the case where no resistive layer is used. The measured resistance ratio value of 6.7 is higher than the ratio (see Figure 14) measured under small signal conditions. This ratio corresponds to a permeability of about 400 in the magnetic substrate. Figures 10 and 12 show that a given heater structure, i.e., with fixed dimensions and electrical properties, could be operated over a moderately wide band of frequencies while maintaining useful performance properties. These curves do not, however, teach how to achieve the same electrical performance at a much different frequency. In order to do this the laws of electrical similitude must be brought to bear on the situation. These similitude or scaling rules are given by Stratton ("Electromagnetic Theory" Section 9.3, pp 488-490, McGraw Book Co., New York, 1941). Figure 16 illustrates an embodiment wherein the magnetic layer is wholly enclosed within the high resistance layer and both layers are continuous; that is, closed layers. Specifically a copper body 25 is enclosed within a magnetic layer 27 in turn enclosed within a high resistance layer 29 of non-magnetic material. The performance of such a structure is quite similar to the structure of Figure 4 but does not suffer from demagnetising effects since the magnetic layer is continuous. The effect of the thickness of the non-magnetic resistive layer on performance of this device is illustrated in Figure 17. With a thickness of 0.7 mils (.018mm), about 3 skin depths, for the magnetic layer the S/R ratio falls rapidly as a function of increasing thickness of the outer resistive layer T₁; falling from S/R = 115 to 54 with an increase of T₁ from 0 to 0.4 mils (.01mm). Power factor rises rapidly as increasing percentages of current are confined to the resistive layer; rising to .96 over the plotted range.

Claims: An autoregulating electrical resistance heater comprising a layer of ferromagnetic material (2,5,8,17,27) adapted to be connected across a source of substantially constant alternating current (10) whereby the heater temperature autoregulates at a level determined by the effective Curie temperature of the ferromagnetic material, characterised in that there is applied to at least one current-carrying face of the ferromagnetic layer in intimate electrical and thermal contact therewith a layer of non-magnetic material (1,4,7,15,29) which is electrically conductive but of high electrical resistivity, whereby below Curie a substantial proportion of the current flows in the non-magnetic layer and the power factor of the two -layer combination is higher than that of the ferromagnetic layer alone. A heater according to Claim 1, wherein the resistivity of the non-magnetic layer is in the range of 60 to 5,000 microhm-cm. A heater according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, wherein the non-magnetic layer consists of electroless nickel. A heater according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, wherein the non-magnetic layer consists of a high resistivity nichrome alloy. A heater according to Claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the non-magnetic layer consists of an electrically-conductive organic polymer. A heater according to any preceding claim, wherein the non-magnetic highly-resistive material layer (15) is applied to both faces of the ferromagnetic layer (17). A heater according to Claim 6, wherein the non-magnetic material layer totally surrounds the ferromagnetic layer. A heater according to Claim 7, wherein the electric current is applied by induction from a close-coupled surrounding coil (18). A heater according to any of Claims 1 to 5, wherein the non-magnetic high resistivity material layer is applied to one face of the ferromagnetic layer and a highly electrically-conductive low electrical resistance layer (9,25) is applied in intimate electrical and thermal contact with the opposite face, whereby at the effective Curie temperature the ferromagnetic layer serves to switch current from the high resistivity layer to the low resistance layer. A heater according to Claim 9, wherein the thickness of the ferromagnetic layer is 1 / 3 to 2 / 3 of a skin depth at a selected operating frequency. A heater according to Claim 9, wherein the thickness of the ferromagnetic layer is between one skin depth and several skin depths at a selected operating frequency. A heater according to Claim 9 or Claim 10 or Claim 11, wherein the non-magnetic highly conductive low resistance layer (25) is entirely surrounded by the ferromagnetic material layer (27) which is, in turn, entirely surrounded by the non-magnetic high resistivity material layer (29).

Inventors: CARTER, PHILIP S., JR.
Applicants: METCAL INC.
Application year: 1987
Main classification: H05B6
IPC codes: H05B3, H05B6, H01C13