Reinforcing composite for roofing membranes and process for making such composites

Abstract: A reinforcing composite for bituminous roofing membranes is made by combining as a first layer an open network of non-woven adhesive free continuous filament yarns and as second and third layers, placed one on each side of the first layer, lightweight preformed mats or networks, and thereafter impregnating them with an adhesive resin which is then dried or cured.

Description: This invention relates to reinforcing composites for use in bituminous roofing membranes. Specifically, this invention comprises composites made from (i) a first layer comprised of an open network of non-woven, continuous filament yarns which are neither fastened together mechanically (as by knitting) nor adhered together, (ii) on one side of the first layer, a second layer comprised of a lightweight preformed mat or network, preferably a polyester mat, and (iii) on the other side of the first layer, a third layer comprised of a lightweight preformed mat or network, preferably a polyester mat. Further, in the composites of this invention, the first layer is held together and affixed to the second and third layers essentially only by leading the three layers together as the first layer is being formed, impregnating them with an adhesive resin and thereafter drying and/or curing the resin. This invention also comprises processes for making such composites, heat stabilization of such composites, and roofing membranes which incorporate such composites as a reinforcement. These composites are flexible, capable of being impregnated by bituminous material, and have sufficient strength to be useful in reinforcing roofing membranes. DETAILED DESCRIPTION 1. Field of the Invention In the manufacture of roofing membranes, a reinforcing sheet is saturated with bituminous material by leading the sheet through a tank or vat of bituminous material heated to about 275 to 425°F (135 to 220°C) using methods which are known in the art. This invention may also be utilized with cold mastics, i.e., materials which will not come into contact with hot coatings either in the coating process or during application to a roof. The resulting roofing membranes are rolled up for later installation, principally on flat roofs using additional bituminous material or a torch or other source of heat to seal the membrane and the joints. The bituminous material used in making these membranes is often a "modified bitumen" such as asphalt combined with about 20% by weight of atactic polypropylene or 5 to 15% styrene butadiene block copolymer rubber. This invention relates to a new form of composite sheet for use in reinforcing such membranes. 2. Description of the Prior Art Some of the various kinds of sheets used to reinforce bituminous roofing membranes are described in (1) applicant's United States Patent No. 4,491,617 which describes roofing membranes made using thermoplastic adhesives with a non-woven network, (2) applicant's United States Patent No. 4,539,254, which describes roofing membranes made using thermosetting adhesives with a non-woven network and (3) applicant's US-A-4 780 350 (application Serial No. 744,210, filed June 13, 1985), which describes heat stabilized, mechanically-fastened networks of yarns which may also be mechanically-fastened to polyester mats. From US-A-3,728,195 an apparatus for producing a textile non-woven network is known. On this apparatus, the non-woven network produced from at least three continuous threads is firstly produced and then, in order to make it capable of storage and transport, is fed to an immersion bath in which it is impregnated with a resin. The impregnated network is subsequently dried, cured and rolled up. From EP-A-110,039 a composite is known which consists of three layers whereby the middle layer is a fiberglass network provided with a coating and on each side of which a polyester mat is arranged, whereby this arrangement is connected under pressure and heat. In EP-A-185,169 a similar composite to that known from reference (2) is described but in the case of this composite the middle fiberglass layer provided with a coating is additionally coated on both sides with an acrylic resin before fiberglass mats are arranged which are then adhered to the middle, already coated fiberglass layer by means of drying and curing. From GB-A-1,517,595 a non-woven network is likewise known which is reinforced by conglutination with an acrylic resin and additionally coated with a bitumen polymer. From DE-A-2,622,206 a process for producing a three-layer composite is described. In this process a mat layer of glass staple fiber is scooped from a container and laid onto a continuous belt. A non-woven or adhered network layer is then placed onto this mat layer, this in turn being covered by a second mat layer likewise fed via a continuous belt. The resultant three-layer composite is fed to a fixing bath in which it is impregnated with a binding agent. Subsequently, the impregnated composite is dried or cured in a drying oven. A three-layer composite of non-woven layers is known from FR-A-2,562,471. It is described here that the middle layer of polyester material with a thickness of 70 g/m 2 between two fiberglass layers with a thickness of 150 to 160 g/m 2 each is provided. This arrangement is then adhered with a resin. The present invention differs from previous inventions of applicants in the following respects, among others. Rather than (a) preparing an open, non-woven network and (b) applying an adhesive to that network in order to hold the network together, and (c) adhering a mat to that first network, applicants have discovered that it is possible (a) to prepare an open, non woven network and, before applying any adhesive, (b) to place lightweight mats or networks on both sides of the first network, and thereafter (c) to impregnate the resulting combination with a resin, which adheres the combination together. This has been found to result in unexpectedly better properties. For example, relative to prior art reinforcements made of fiberglass mat or fiberglass mat/fiberglass scrim composites, roofing membranes of this invention show improved finished tear-strength and finished puncture strength as well as better "dead-fold" (that is, less of a tendency of the finished roofing membrane to resume its original flat shape when folded into or against roof corners during installation, for example when used as flashing). In addition, relative to prior art heavy polyester reinforcement mats of equivalent tensile strength, products of this invention made of polyester scrim as the first layer, with second and third layers made of polyester mats, show unexpectedly better properties, especially improved finished tear strength, improved ease of saturation, and improved dimensional stability during impregnation with bitumen and during installation on the roof. 3. Description of the Invention This invention comprises composites of a first layer of an open network of continuous filament fiberglass or polyester yarns, as described herein, and second and third layers of a lightweight mat or network. The first layer of this invention is an open network structure made of continuous filament fiberglass or polyester yarn, preferably a network which is neither woven together, nor knit together, nor held together by adhesive. It preferably consists of a non-woven fiberglass scrim prepared for example as described in U.S. Patent No. 3,728,195 of about 0.1 to 5 ounces per square yard (4 to 200 grams per square meter). Most preferably the fiberglass network weighs about 2 ounces per square yard (75 grams per square meter). Another preferred network consists of a non woven polyester scrim also prepared for example as described in U.S. Patent 3,728,195 of high tenacity polyester warp and weft yarns and weighing about 0.1 to 5 ounces per square yard (4 to 200 grams per square meter), and may have in addition evenly spaced machine-direction fiberglass continuous filament reinforcement across the entire width. The weight of this fiberglass reinforcement is preferably from about 0.04 to 2.0 ounces per square yard (1.5 to 75 grams per square meter), and most preferably about 0.15 ounces per square yard (6 grams per square meter). An open network consisting entirely of polyester and without heat stabilization may be used with cold mastic. Such polyester networks have the weights described above. The second and third layers of this invention are a mat or network which, by providing partial or full coverage in the openings or "windows" between the yarns of the first layer, enables the bituminous material to form a continuous sheet on the composite. The second and third layers preferably are a mat which consists essentially of polyester filaments, though other synthetic mats such as mats of nylon or combinations of polyester and nylon, may be used. ("Mat" as used herein refers to an entangled mass of filaments, preferably structures which are spun-bonded.) The mat is preformed, preferably spun-bonded, and lightweight relative to mats used in the prior art without reinforcement in bituminous roofing membranes. More specifically, "lightweight" means a mat weighing about 0.3 to 4 ounces per square yard (10 to 140 grams per square meter), most preferably about 0.5 ounces per square yard (17 grams per square meter). By "preformed" is meant a mat which has been fabricated into the mat form before it is combined with the open network. A composite of the first, second and third layers of this invention is impregnated with a single coating of adhesive resin. This coating is applied to the composite after or at the time they are brought together. The coating serves to coat at least some individual yarns and filaments, but it does not form a film which closes all openings through the composite. It has been found that, because only a single resin coating is applied to the composite, rather than the previously used two coatings (one to bind the non-woven network together and one to adhere a mat to the network), there is a smaller possibility of water reaching the filaments of the composite. The composite of the present invention can also be made thinner, because the first layer is not separated from the second and third by a coating of adhesive. In addition, the composite can be made stiffer than previous polyester mat reinforcements during the manufacturing process, which is desirable from the standpoint of controlling the process, but less stiff in the final product than previous products using thermoset adhesives. Less stiffness in the final product is desirable because it leads to ease of handling, reduced tendency to crack, and use of less material. When two mats are used, one on each side of the network, the adhesive tends to bind one mat to the other through the openings in the network, which helps reduce the possibility of the network coming apart during manufacture of the roofing. By controlling the adhesive resin used to adhere the second and third layers to the first layer, one is able to control the stiffness of the composite and thereby to tailor it to the manufacturing process and to optimize the quality of the final roofing membrane. The general objective in the coating process is to impregnate each yarn and coat each filament in the composite as completely as possible without the resin filling in opening space between yarns and filaments. Heat stabilization of the composite may be necessary when polyester in the composite has not previously been heat stabilized to the temperatures necessary for the applications intended for the product. Heat stabilization, if needed, may be accomplished by subjecting the composite to heat treatment, for example by passing the composite through an oven while conditions such as temperature, tension, and dwell time at high temperature are controlled to achieve minimal shrinkage in the machine and cross-machine directions at temperatures used in saturating with bituminous material. It is preferred to use temperatures up to about 460°F (238°C) and to control the tension and dwell time to result in shrinkage during the heat stabilization step of 5% to 10%, with the resulting composite having a free shrinkage of less than 1% in both machine and cross-machine directions as a result of the combination of heat setting and heat relaxation which occurs under these conditions. In making the measurement of free shrinkage, it is preferred to cut ten strips of fabric ten inches long by one inch wide. Five are cut in the machine direction and five in the cross-machine direction at positions selected from across the width of the structure. These strips are placed vertically in an oven under light tension just sufficient to keep them straight. The shrinkage of each set of five samples is measured after five minutes at 400°F (222°C) and the results are averaged. If the average shrinkage is too great (greater than one percent) in either direction, the composite is run through the heat stabilization treatment again at higher temperature, or slower speed, or less tension, until the desired level of free shrinkage is reached. "Resins" is used to mean chemicals that increase stiffness, provide water resistance, or otherwise improve properties of the polyester composite or the properties of the final roofing membrane. Resins are added by thoroughly saturating the composite at an add-on rate of about 5 to 100 parts of resin per 100 parts by weight of composite but preferably with about 10 to 20 parts of resin. The resin is typically a cross-linked acrylic resin but may be any resinous material which is unaffected by water and retains its bonding properties up to temperatures used in making roofing membranes. For finished roofing membranes containing a polyester composite or a polyester/fiberglass combination as a reinforcement, both the amount of resin added and the stiffness of the resin may be adjusted to achieve desired properties. For example, when the final roofing membrane is to be thick, stiffer reinforcements may be required to help processing through the production line. Also, a stiffer reinforcement is required for low modulus asphalt membranes to facilitate handling during installation on the roof, and also to improve roll integrity and minimize damage in transit. The following examples will illustrate the invention. EXAMPLE 1 Using a machine of the kind described in U.S. patent 3,728,195, a fiberglass fabric was formed having 6 yarns per inch (236 per metre) in the machine direction and 6 yarns per inch (236 per metre) in the cross-machine direction of 37 1/0 fiberglass yarn. Spun-bonded polyester mat weighing 0.5 oz/sqyd (20 g/m 2 ) was applied to each side of the fiberglass structure and the assembly was in turn saturated with 20 parts (per 100 parts by weight of composite) of a black-tinted cross-linking acrylic latex resin saturant consisting of Rohm and Haas Rhoplex HA 16 (92 parts by weight per 100 parts of the solids content of the saturant), Cymel 303 cross-linking agent (4.4 parts), black pigment (2.8 parts) and ammonium nitrate as a catalyst (0.8 parts) in water (in the proportion of 28% by weight of solids to 72% by weight of water), and the composite was dried and cured. Conditions of tension, speed, solids content of the saturant, and pressure used to squeeze off excess saturant were adjusted such that the acrylic latex resin did not form a surface film on the structure of yarns. Tension control was also important to ensure addition of the polyester mats in a wrinkle free yet relaxed manner. The resulting structure was suitable for use as a reinforcing composite for roofing membranes. EXAMPLE 2 Using a machine as described in Example 1, a polyester fabric was formed having 5 yarns per inch (197 per meter) in the machine direction and 5 yarns per inch (197 yarns per meter) in the cross-machine direction of high tenacity 1000 denier polyester yarn. In addition 75 1/0 fiberglass yarns were added at 2 yarns per inch (79 yarns per meter) in the machine direction. This yarn structure weighed 1.57 oz/sqyd (62 g/m 2 ). Spun-bonded polyester mat weighing 0.5 oz/sqyd (20 g/m 2 ) was applied to each side of the fiberglass structure and the assembly. This structure was heat stabilized by unrolling it and feeding over a series of preheated rolls at 450°F (232°C), then through a heated nip at 450°F (232°C), under tension which was controlled to keep the fiberglass yarns taut and overcome the shrink force of the machine direction polyester yarns. Dwell-time was adjusted until the finished fabric had 1% or less of free shrinkage, in both the machine and cross-machine direction when tested at 400°F (204°C) for five minutes. The resulting structure was suitable for use as a reinforcing composite for roofing membranes. EXAMPLE 3 Using a LIBA Copcentra machine, a warp-knit weft-inserted polyester knit structure was created having 9 yarns per inch (354 per meter) in the machine direction and 9 yarns per inch (354 per metre) in the weft direction of 1000 denier high tenacity polyester yarn. The knitting yarn used was 70 denier regular tenacity polyester yarn. A chain stitch was used to combine the structure with 70 denier yarn spaced at 9 stitches/inch (354 stitches/m) over each 1000 denier warp yarn and forming a full stitch between each 1000 denier weft yarn. The polyester structure was heat stabilized by unrolling it and feeding over a series of preheated rolls at 450°F (232°C), then through a heated nip at 450°F (232°C), under tension which was controlled to result in an overfeed into the heating section of 5%. Conditions were adjusted until the finished fabric had 1% or less of free shrinkage in both the machine and cross machine directions when tested at 400°F (204°C) for five minutes as described above. The heat stabilized polyester structure was then led onto one side of a non-woven, adhesive-free fiberglass scrim as it was being formed. The fiberglass scrim had 6 yarns per inch (236 per metre) in both the machine and cross machine directions of 37 1/0 fiberglass yarns. At the same time, a spun-bonded polyester mat weighing 0.5 oz/sq yd (20 g/m 2 ) was led onto the other side of the fiberglass scrim. This combination of three layers was coated with 20 parts (per 100 parts by weight of the combination of the three layers) of black-tinted cross-linking acrylic latex resin saturant consisting of Rohm & Haas Rhoplex HA16 (92 parts by weight per 100 parts of the solids content of the saturant), Cymel 303 cross-linking agent (4.4 parts), black pigment (2.8 parts) and ammonium nitrate as a catalyst (0.8 parts) in water (in the proportion of 28% by weight of solids to 72% by weight of water), and the resulting composite was dried and cured. Conditions of tension, speed, solids content of the saturant, and pressure used to squeeze off excess saturant were adjusted such that the acrylic latex penetrated the fiber bundles and the finished surface remained porous, i.e. the acrylic latex did not form a surface film. The resulting structure was suitable for use as a reinforcing composite for roofing membranes.

Claims: A process of making a flexible composite, capable of being impregnated by bituminous material and of sufficient strength for use in reinforcing roofing membranes in which a first layer of a non-woven network is combined with second and third layers of mats or networks to form the composite and in which said second and third layer are preformed and rolled up before they are combined, characterized by the steps of: selecting as a first layer a non-woven network of continuous filament yarns, which are neither fastened together mechanically nor adhered together, selecting as a second and third layer preformed, synthetic mats or networks having a weight between 10 to 140 grams per square meter, unrolling and placing the second layer on one side of the first layer and the third layer on the other side of the first layer as the first layer is being formed, applying to the three layers an adhesive resin such that the filament yarns are impregnated and - if present - the mat fibers are coated as completely as possible without resin filling the openings of the filament yarns and - if present - of the mat fibers and drying and/or curing the resin. A process according to claim 1, characterized in that the mat essentially consists of polyester filaments. A process according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the network of the first layer essentially consists of fiberglass yarns. A process according to claim 1, 2 or 3, characterized in that a least one of the second and third layers is spunbonded.

Inventors: COOPER IAN G, O'CONNOR TERRY J, WOICESHYN MARK, COOPER, IAN G., O'CONNOR, TERRY J., WOICESHYN, MARK
Applicants: BAY MILLS LTD, BAY MILLS LIMITED
Application year: 1987
Main classification: D04H5
IPC codes: D04H5, B29C70, B32B17, E04D5