SYSTEM FOR ADJUSTING PERFORMANCE OF INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS

Abstract: A system for adjusting a performance of an information processing apparatus which provides a unit indicating a target performance value (12), a unit (11) generating a corresponding performance control pulse (13) in accordance with the target performance value (12), and a execution control unit (14) which alternately sets an execution period and an execution inhibiting period in accordance with the performance control pulse (13). The unit (11) which gener­ ates the performance control pulse (13) makes a ratio of a pulse width (T1) and a pulse period (T0) of the performance control pulse coincide with the target performance value (12).

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an information processing apparatus, more particularly, it relates to as control system for adjusting a performance of the information processing apparatus. 2. Description of the Related Art In the typical information processing apparatus, the processing performance of the apparatus usually must be set to a predetermined target level. For example, a plurality of models forming one family must set a plurality of target performance grades, respectively. However, in such a case, if each model is designed and manufactured on an individual basis, the cost thereof is greatly increased. Therefore, in many cases, one information processing apparatus having a high level performance as a basic performance is prepared, and the various factors which affect the performance of the operation, such as processing speed, are adjusted with respect to the prepared information processing apparatus. Thus an apparatus i.e., the models thereof, having a plurality of required target performances is obtained. Many various factors are used for adjusting the performance of the information processing apparatus, and the main elements among these factors are shown below. (1) Hardware Factors (a) Modification of buffer memory capacity When the capacity of the buffer memory is modified, the condition in which a buffer mishit occurs may vary, and a frequency causing the buffer mishit may also vary, having an effect on the processing speed. This phenomena is often utilized. (b) Modification of degrees of a loading control The manner in which instructions are packed in pipe lines or the frequency for-parallel processing is modified to cause a change in the processing efficiency. (c) Utilization and non-utilization of a high speed operation mechanism The speed of an arithmetic operation is changed in accordance with the addition or non-addition of the operation mechanism such as a high speed adder or a high speed multiplier. (2) Microprogram Factors (a) Inserting a dummy step into a microprogram By inserting a dummy step into a microprogram, the number of unused steps is increased, and thus the processing time can be extended. (b) Inserting a dummy interlock A code causing an interlock of a dummy during the processing of the pipe line is set in the microprogram. In the conventional method for adjusting the performance of the device mentioned above, the desired target performance value cannot be absolutely guaranteed, and this causes a problem in that variations occur therein in accordance with the system circumstances. For example, in an application in which the factor of using the buffer memory is originally low, if the capacity of the buffer memory is decreased, the processing time is not highly extended, and thus the performance is not degraded. However, in an application in which the factor of using the buffer memory is high, if the capacity of the buffer memory is decreased, the processing time is suddenly extended, and a considerable degradation of the performance is caused. Further, in the method for inserting a dummy step, etc., into the mircoprogram, the microprogram is modified for each model, this causes a problem wherein correction or management of the microprogram becomes difficult. A further problem arises wherein a larger capacity of the control memory is required more often in low order models. Another approach to varying the performance of a computer is disclosed in document EP-A- 58 109 937 and consists in adding a fixed delay between successive instructions. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to provide a system which can easily and precisely adjust the performance of the information processing apparatus to obtain the target value. In the present invention, an information processing execution period and an information processing execution inhibiting period in which the information processing is inhibited are provided alternately, and a ratio thereof, that is, the ratio of the time usable for the execution from the whole time, is made adjustable so that a desired target performance value can be set. The present invention achieves this by providing a means for controlling the execution of the information processing apparatus by using a performance control pulse which indicates the information processing execution period and the information processing execution inhibiting period by an ON and OFF operation thereof, and a means for making a pulse duty ratio of this performance control pulse coincide with the target performance value. Further features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the ensuing description with reference to the accompanying drawings to which, however, the scope of the invention is in no way limited. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a block diagram of a usual computer system to which the present invention is applied; Figs. 2 is diagram showing the principle of the construction of the present invention; Fig. 3 A and 3B illustrate waveforms showing examples of the performance control pulse; Fig. 4 is a diagram showing an outline of the construction of one embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 5 is a diagram showing details of an embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 6 is a diagram showing details of a circuit for forming a release signal for each TAG register shown in Fig. 5; Fig. 7 is a diagram showing details of a circuit of an instruction prefetch circuit control portion shown in Fig. 6; and Fig. 8 is a diagram explaining the instruction process by a degraded counter signal shown in Fig. 7. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Figure 1 is a block diagram of a computer system usually used in industry. In Fig. 1, 1 designates a service processor (SVP), 2 designates a computer (CPU) in which 2a, 2b, and 2c are an instruction unit, an execution unit, and a storage unit, respectively, 3 designates a memory control unit (MCU), 4 designates a main storage unit (MSU), 5 designates a channel processor (CHP), and 6a, ..., 6n designate I/O devices. The present invention relates to the instruction unit 2a in the computer 2 of Fig. 1. Figure 2 shows a principle of the construction of the present invention, wherein 11 denotes a performance control pulse generating portion, 12 a target performance value, 13 a performance control pulse, and 14 an execution control portion. The execution control portion 14 is allowed to process the instruction and to carry out a fetch operation for next instruction only during the execution period (for example, during an ON period) indicated by the performance control pulse 13 output from the performance control pulse generating portion 11, and is inhibited from processing the instruction and from carrying out the fetch operation for the the next instruction during the execution inhibiting period (for example, during an OFF period). Therefore, when the execution inhibiting period occurs, the information processing apparatus is frozen in a state in which it maintains the state just before the execution inhibiting period occurred. When the execution inhibiting period is released, processing of the instruction is commenced from the maintained state. Figures 3A and 3B show examples of the performance control pulses corresponding to various target performance values. Figure 3A shows a performance control pulse generated when the target performance value is to be set at 0.75, setting the basic performance of the information processing apparatus to "1", that is, the ratio between the pulse period T₀ the execution period T₁ , i.e., the pulse duty ratio is set at 0.75. Figure 3B shows a similar performance control pulse generated when the target performance value is to be set at 0.5. Therefore, as shown in Fig. 3B, the ratio between T₀ and T₁ is set at 0.5. Accordingly, the target performance value is made to coincide with the pulse duty of the performance control pulse, and the actual operation enable period of the information processing apparatus is restricted, so that the information processing apparatus is adjusted to the desired target performance. Figure 4 is a diagram showing the construction of one embodiment of the present invention. In Fig. 4, 11 denotes the performance control pulse generating portion, 12 the target performance value, 13 the performance control pulse, 14 the execution control portion, 15 a service processor SVP, 16 a scanning counter, 17 a problem mode target value register, 18 a supervisor mode target value register, 19 and 20 comparators, 21 and 22 AND circuits, and 23 an inverter circuit. The performance control pulse generating portion 11 sets the performance differently according to whether the information processing apparatus is in a problem program mode state or in a supervisor program mode state. This is because, if the performance is lowered uniformly in both mode states, the service for the user sometimes becomes extremely poor, and therefore, these modes should be suitably balanced. When the information processing apparatus is not in a WAIT state or in a STOP state, the scanning counter 16 is counted up by every clock pulse, and when a full count is reached, the count up is repeated to continue the scanning operation. The problem mode target value register 17 and the supervisor mode target value register 18 are previously set by the performance target value in each mode state, by the service processor SVP 15. The comparators 19 and 20 constantly compare the values of the scanning counter 16 and the target value registers 17 and 18, and output the result of the comparison to the AND circuits 21 and 22. When it is assumed that the value of the scanning counter 16 is A, and the values of the target value registers 17 and 18 are B and C, respectively, the comparators 19 and 20 turn ON when A < B and A < C, and turn OFF when A ≧ B and A ≧ C. Therefore, for example, the comparator 19 forms the pulse which turns ON during the scanning period when the value A of the scanning counter 16 is in the condition 0 < A < B, and turns OFF during the scanning period when B ≦ A ≦ (full count). This is the same for the comparator 20. This enables the performance control pulse having the desired pulse duty explained in Fig 3A and 3B to be formed. With respect to the AND circuits 21 and 22, only one of which is placed in the operation enable state, by the problem mode signal (and its reversed supervisor mode signal), under a state wherein the performance adjust mode signal is set at ON when the performance of the information processing apparatus is adjusted. Therefore, the outputs of the comparators 19 and 20 are sealed by an AND circuit (one of 21 and 22) which is in the operation enable state, and the performance control pulse is then sent to the execution control portion 14. The execution control portion 14 stops the instruction fetch operation by, for example, interlocking the address cycle of the pipe line. The fetch of the instruction (prefetch) is also usually carried out during such an interlock; the setting is such that this operation is also inhibited. Further, many other circuit means exist in which the pulse duty ratio for forming the performance control pulse according to the present invention can be varied, in addition to the counter or the comparator shown in Fig. 4, and these can be suitably selected and used when necessary. Of course, it is clear that this process can be also carried out by software means. Figure 5 shows a relationship between the instruction unit 2a (I-unit), the execution unit 2b (E-unit), and the storage unit 2c (S-unit), in which the I-unit 2a is the central element. There are six pipe line stages, D, A, T, B, E, W, and each stage is explained as follows. D --- the stage in which the machine instruction is decoded and a register file 31 is read out for calculation of the operand. A --- the stage in which the calculation of the operand address is carried out by an address adder 32. T --- the stage in which the calculated operand address is sent to the S unit (2c), to access a buffer storage 41, and the control information is sent to the E unit (2b). B --- the stage in which the operand data is read out from the buffer or the register file 31. E --- the stage in which the calculation is carried out in the E unit (2b). W --- the stage in which the result of the calculation is written into the register file 31. The preferred embodiment of the present invention is a pipeline system controlled by a microprogram. The machine instruction fetched from the S unit enters an instruction buffer 35, and a control storage is accessed by a machine instruction thereof, so that the microinstruction (also called TAG) is read out. This operation propagates to each of the TAG registers 37a ∼ 37f of D, A, ..., W at every cycle, and one microinstruction is processed via each stage of D, A, ..., W. One machine instruction is processed by one or a plurality of microinstructions in accordance with the kind thereof. The propagation between the TAG registers is controlled by release signals, as shown in Fig 6. For example, one microcommand is propagated from the D TAG register to the A TAG register and a next microcommand is read to the D TAG register. Therefore, usually, different microcommands are stored in each TAG register, and the hardware for each TAG is operated by a different instruction, (that is, a register file 31 for D, an address adder 32 for A, the S unit (2c) and E unit control 42 for T, the S unit and a register file 31 for B; the E unit (2c) for E, and a register file 31 for W). This control is well known, and is called pipeline control. Further, reference numerals 11 and 14 in Fig. 4 correspond to the reference numerals 39, 50 in Fig. 5. Figure 6 is a circuit for forming a release signal for each TAG register. Each TAG register receives the release signal as a set enable signal. For example, when the T TAG register receives the A-release signal as the set enable signal, the microcommand in the A TAG register stored immediately before that time is set to the T TAG register. The release signal forming portion in each stage has a similar construction, and generates a release signal when no interlock signal exists and a valid flag is set. The release signal in a certain stage sets the valid flag in the next stage. When the interlocks condition does not exist in the next stage, the release signal in the next stage is generated. The operation is carried out in a domino manner, i.e., one after the other in sequence. When the valid flag is reset in the former stage, the release signal thereof is also turned OFF, then the valid flag in the next stage also turns OFF, and thus the release signal in the next stage turns OFF; this operation is also carried out in a domino manner, as above. When the interlock condition exists in a certain stage, if the valid flag is set, a release signal is not generated. Therefore, the feedback signal to the former stage turns ON, and this becomes an interlock condition in the former stage, then in the stage before the stage wherein the interlock condition exists all release signals are inhibited. When the first interlock condition is released, a release signal is generated in the next stage, and as a result, the feedback signal to the former stage turns OFF, accordingly the inhibition for the release signal in the former stage is also released. Concrete examples of the interlock condition in each stage are explained as follows. D --- when the content of the register written in the former instruction is used for calculation of the operand address in the present instruction; A --- when the buffer is accessed, the data to be searched is not in the buffer and access to the main storage unit is required; etc. In the embodiment of the present invention, as one of the interlock conditions in A stage, the inverted output of the degrade counter is used. Figure 7 shows details of the instruction pre-fetch control portion shown in Fig 5. As can be seen in the figure, a prefetch request 45 should be gated by the output of the degrade counter 39. This inhibit of the prefetch request is not always necessary for the present invention, however, it is preferable to control the prefetch function by the degrade counter signal to ensure an exact coincidence of the apparatus and the target performance. Figure 8 is a diagram explaining the process of the instruction by the degrade counter signal. In Fig 8, (A) is a time chart for when the degrade counter 39 stops the clock pulse, and (B) shows that, in the processing of an instruction which requires communication with an external device, for example, a channel processor in the prior art, the channel processor side cannot be stopped, and thus the process cannot be effectively carried out. However, in the present invention, as shown in (C) , when the degraded counter signal turns OFF, only instruction operations entered in the A stage at that time are interlocked, and instruction operations already subsequent to the T stage are carried out, and thus no problem arises. As mentioned above, according to the present invention, the performance can be properly adjusted in a wide range by providing only a simple circuit means in the information processing apparatus. Further, this decreases the cost of the information processing apparatus and the usual maintenance and management problems.

Claims: 1. System for adjusting a performance of an information processing apparatus (2) in which said adjusting system provides a means for indicating a target performance value (12), characterized in that it comprises a means (11) for generating a corresponding performance control pulse (13) in accordance with said indicated target performance value, and an execution control means (14) for alternately setting an information processing execution period (T₁) and an information processing execution inhibiting period in accordance with the performance control pulse which is generated, and said means for generating said performance control pulse makes a ratio of a pulse width (T₁) and a pulse period (T₀) of said performance control pulse coincide with said target performance value. 2. System for adjusting a performance of an information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said means (11) for generating a corresponding performance value sets a different performance value when said information processing apparatus is in a problem program mode state and when said information processing apparatus is in a supervisor program mode state. 3. System for adjusting a performance of an information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein said means (11) for generating a corresponding performance value comprises: a scanning counter (16) which is counted up except when said information processing apparatus is in a wait or stop state; a problem mode target value register (17) which is set to the performance target value in the program mode target value from a service mode processor (15); a supervisor mode target value register (18) which is set to the performance target value in the supervisor mode target value from the service mode processor (15); a first comparator (19) which constantly compares the set value in said problem mode target value register with the counted value of said scanning counter; a second comparator (20) which constantly compares the set value in said supervisor mode target value register with the counted value of said scanning counter; a first AND gate (21) which receives the output of said first comparator and a problem mode signal; a second AND gate (22) which receives the output of said second comparator and a reversed problem mode signal, that is, a supervisor mode signal; where one of the outputs of said first AND gate and second AND gate is connected to said execution control means (14). 4. System for adjusting a performance of an information processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein when said problem mode target value register (17) is set to the value B and when the value of said scanning counter is the value A,said first comparator turns ON when 0 < A < B and turns OFF when B ≦ A ≦ (full count). 5. System for adjusting a performance of an information processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein when said supervisor mode target value register (18) is set to the value C and when the value of said scanning counter is the value A, said second comparator turns ON when 0 < A < C and turns OFF when C ≦ A ≦ (full count). 6. System of adjusting a performance of an information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said information processing apparatus is a pipe line system, and when a performance adjust pulse turns OFF, said execution control means (14) is operated so that processing of the instruction already being executed in the pipe line is continued in that condition, and the instruction to be executed substantially thereafter is stopped.

Inventors: KITAMURA, TOSHIAKI, OINAGA, YUJI, ONISHI, KATSUMI, SHIMIZU, KAZUYUKI
Applicants: FUJITSU LIMITED
Application year: 1986
Main classification: G06F9
IPC codes: G06F9, G06F1, G06F15