ROCK ANALYSER

Abstract: A rock analyser comprises a chamber containing a heater (2) and the sensor (6) of a hydrocarbon detector (7), the heater (2) being connectable to a source of power (5) and the sensor (6) being connected to the remainder of the hydrocarbon det­ ector (7). The analyser determines the amount of hydrocarbon mat­ erial present in the rock. It is portable and is useful for field screening tests to reduce the number of samples sent for lab­ oratory analysis.

Description: ROCK ANALYSER This invention relates to a portable rock analyser. Organic geochemists routinely measure the organic content of rocks by laboratory pyrolysis. This organic matter may be divided into two types; volatile material (oil) and polymeric, involatile material (kerogen). On heating, kerogen decomposes to give volatile components (oil and gas) and an inert residue. Thus rocks containing significant quantities of labile kerogen are considered to be hydrocarbon source rocks. Conventional laboratory procedure for identifying source rocks includes a two-stage pyrolysis in an inert atmosphere with the expelled hydrocarbons being detected by a flame ionisation detector (FID). The first stage of the pyrolysis takes place between 2500 and 3000C and is intended to detect only the oil. The second stage occurs at 5000-600DC, at which temperatures kerogen breakdown rapidly occurs. The two values obtained are referred to as S1 or P1 (low temperature products) and S2 or P2 (high temperature products). The units are usually kg (hydrocarbons) per tonne (rock). A typical laboratory determination takes 20-30 minutes and uses carefully prepared and finely ground rock samples. Considerable effort is spent performing a treat many of these analyses as a means of identifying rich samples, suitable for further geochemical analysis. The majority of samples tested contain little or no organic material, however. It is an object of the present invention to provide a portable rock analyser for use in field screening tests to reduce the number of worthless samples sent to laboratories for analysis. This will, in turn, allow more expedient analyses of the richer samples. Thus according to the present invention, there is provided a rock analyser comprising a chamber containing a heater and the sensor of a hydrocarbon detector, the heater being connectable to a source of power and the sensor being connected to the remainder of the hydrocarbon detector. Hydrocarbon detectors are commercially available. Suitable models include the GL-10 detector for methane manufactured by Molecular Controls Ltd of Leeds, England and the AG 5100 detector for methane, manufactured by International Sensor Technology of California, USA, and described in US patents 3,955,268 and 4,013,943. These are rechargeable battery powered detectors designed for atmospheric monitoring. Whilst the units are primarily designed to detect methane they have been shown to respond to most volatile hydrocarbons. Full Scale Deflection (FSD) corresponds to 5 methane by volume. The heater may be a ceramic furnace incorporating a heating coil which may be wound from resistance wire and be connectable via a switch to a battery. The heater may incorporate a timer for better reproducibility. The heater is heated to a temperature of around 7000-10000C in less than 30 seconds when the switch is operated. The temperature and rate of heating are such that an inert atmosphere is not necessary in the pyrolysis chamber to ensure degradation rather than combustion. The volume of the chamber should be such that pyrolysis of a 30 mg sample of rock with a combined hydrocarbon yield (Pl+P2) of 50 kg tonne'l would give a theoretical concentration of 5 of hydrocarbons with carbon numbers less than 10 (i.e. full scale deflection). This volume is 100 cm3. Thus the most sensitive range of the instrument is between 1 and 10 kg tonne'l for 30 mg samples. In practice the range will depend on the actual proportion of the generated hydrocarbon sufficiently volatile to give a detector response, the distribution of these products (since the detector is most sensitive to the lighter hydrocarbons) and the size of the samples tested. The 30 mg sample size is chosen as being a convenient size to handle in the field, without requiring large amounts of power to pyrolyse it. The instrument is operated by selecting a suitably seized piece of rock, inserting it into the heater and replacing the lid of the cylinder. The power button is depressed for 20-40 seconds and then released. After allowing a further 30-60 seconds for the instrument to stabilise, the detector reading is recorded. The lid is then removed, allowing clean air to purge the detector. The heater can be cleaned by simply depressing the power button for a few seconds. The instrument is then ready to analyse another sample. The whole process takes less than five minutes. Alternatively, the procedure can be automatically controlled by a timer. The invention is illustrated with reference to the accompanying drawing. The analyser comprises a cylindrical chamber 1 of volume 100 cm3 containing a heating coil 2 wound from four cm of resistance wire (80X Ni, 20X Cr) connected via electrodes 3 and a switch 4 to a two volt lead acid battery 5. The chamber also contains the sensor 6 of a hydrocarbon detector sold by International Sensor Technology under the reference AG 5100. The sensor 6 is connected to the remainder of the detector 7 which is located outside the chamber 1. By selecting a suitable cut-off point, below which samples are considered worthless, the instrument can be used to screen samples in the field prior to full geochemical analysis in the laboratory. This is illustrated by the following examples: Example 1 Pieces of rock of similar size and approximately 30 mg in weight were analysed using the portable instrument described above. A cut-off of 10X FSD was used. All samples were subsequently analysed in the laboratory to check the findings. The results are presented in Table 1. Samples 1-9 were correctly identified as having little or no hydrocarbon potential. Samples 14-25 were correctly identified as having potentials greater than 1 kg tonne'l. Samples 10-13 were identified as having significant potential but were later shown to have little or no potential. Thus the instrument gives readings which err on the side of caution - in no case was a rich sample mis-identified as being poor. In a real field study this exercise would have saved over one third of the laboratory effort. Table 1 EMI4.1 <tb> Sample <SEP> No <SEP> Portable <SEP> Instrument <SEP> Laboratory <SEP> Pyrolysis <tb> <SEP> Reading <SEP> (t <SEP> FSD) <SEP> Yield <SEP> (kg <SEP> tonne <SEP> 1) <SEP> <tb> <SEP> 1 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 0.3 <tb> <SEP> 2 <SEP> 5 <SEP> 0.2 <tb> <SEP> 3 <SEP> 3 <SEP> 0.2 <tb> <SEP> 4 <SEP> 3 <SEP> 0.1 <tb> <SEP> 5 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 6 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 7 <SEP> 4 <SEP> 0.2 <tb> <SEP> 8 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 9 <SEP> 7 <SEP> 0.5 <tb> <SEP> 10 <SEP> 18 <SEP> 0.8 <tb> <SEP> 11 <SEP> 21 <SEP> 0.7 <tb> <SEP> 12 <SEP> 14 <SEP> 0.3 <tb> <SEP> 13 <SEP> 17 <SEP> 0.8 <tb> <SEP> 14 <SEP> 85 <SEP> 2.6 <tb> <SEP> 15 <SEP> 100 <SEP> 4.6 <tb> <SEP> 16 <SEP> 53 <SEP> 1.7 <tb> <SEP> 17 <SEP> 71 <SEP> 2.0 <tb> <SEP> 18 <SEP> 63 <SEP> 2.3 <tb> <SEP> 19 <SEP> 63 <SEP> 2.2 <tb> <SEP> 20 <SEP> 28 <SEP> 1.6 <tb> <SEP> 21 <SEP> greater <SEP> than <SEP> 100 <SEP> 10.2 <tb> <SEP> 22 <SEP> 65 <SEP> 1.9 <tb> <SEP> 23 <SEP> 100 <SEP> 4.4 <tb> <SEP> 24 <SEP> 53 <SEP> 1.8 <tb> <SEP> 25 <SEP> greater <SEP> than <SEP> 100 <SEP> 21.0 <tb> Example 2 A further series of tests were carried out in which the detector was fitted with a digital read-out expressed in kg hydrocarbon material per tonne of rock. The results set out in Table 2 show good agreement between the instrument readings and subsequent analyses carried out under laboratory conditions. Table 2 EMI5.1 <tb> Sample <SEP> No <SEP> Portable <SEP> Instrument <SEP> Reading <SEP> Laboratory <SEP> Pyrolysis <tb> <SEP> (kg/tonne) <SEP> Yield <SEP> (kg/tonne) <tb> <SEP> 26 <SEP> 30 <SEP> 28.0 <tb> <SEP> 27 <SEP> 6 <SEP> 3.5 <tb> <SEP> 28 <SEP> 0.5 <SEP> 0.4 <tb> <SEP> 29 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> 2.1 <tb> <SEP> 30 <SEP> 35 <SEP> 17 <tb> <SEP> 31 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 32 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 3.3 <tb> <SEP> 33 <SEP> 4.5 <SEP> 5.8 <tb> <SEP> 34 <SEP> 20 <SEP> 13.8 <tb> <SEP> 35 <SEP> 5 <SEP> 8.5 <tb> <SEP> 36 <SEP> 16 <SEP> 15.8 <tb> <SEP> 37 <SEP> 33 <SEP> 23.4 <tb> <SEP> 38 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2.6 <tb> <SEP> 39 <SEP> greater <SEP> than <SEP> 50 <SEP> 109 <tb> <SEP> 40 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2.6 <tb> <SEP> 41 <SEP> 34 <SEP> 19.4 <tb> <SEP> 42 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 1.7 <tb> <SEP> 43 <SEP> 0.5 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 44 <SEP> 0.4 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 45 <SEP> greater <SEP> than <SEP> <RTI ID=5.1> 50 <SEP> 90.2 <tb> <SEP> 46 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1.6 <tb> <SEP> 47 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> 0.6 <tb> <SEP> 48 <SEP> 50 <SEP> 68.3 <tb> <SEP> 49 <SEP> greater <SEP> than <SEP> 50 <SEP> 97.4 <tb> <SEP> 50 <SEP> 0.6 <SEP> 0.2 <tb> <SEP> 51 <SEP> 8 <SEP> 9.5 <tb> <SEP> 52 <SEP> 35 <SEP> 28 <tb> <SEP> 53 <SEP> 46 <SEP> 43.6 <tb> <SEP> 54 <SEP> 38 <SEP> 48 <tb> <SEP> 55 <SEP> 31 <SEP> 18 <tb> <SEP> 56 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> 2 <tb> <SEP> 57 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 2 <tb>

Claims: Claims: 1. A rock analyser characterised by the fact that it comprises a chamber (1) containing a heater (2) and the sensor (6) of a hydrocarbon detector (7), the heater (2) being connectable to a source of power (5) and the sensor (6) being connected to the remainder of the hydrocarbon detector (7). 2. A rock analyser according to claim 1 wherein the heater (2) is a ceramic furnace incorporating a heating coil. 3. A rock analyser according to claim 2 wherein the heating coil (2) is fabricated from electrical resistance wire and the source of power (5) is an electric battery. 4. A rock analyser according to any of the preceding claims wherein the hydrocarbon detector (7) is a methane detector.

Inventors: CRISP, RUSSELL IAN BRITISH PETROLEUM CO. P.L.C.
Applicants: THE BRITISH PETROLEUM COMPANY P.L.C.
Application year: 1986
Main classification: G01N33
IPC codes: G01N33, G01N31