MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING METHOD UTILIZING SMALL EXCITATION PULSES

Abstract: In known spin echo imaging experiments a waiting period is customarily observed between two successive spin echo measurements in order to allow for the magnetic moment to relax in the direction of the uniform magnetic field Bo. In addition to this waiting period, the use of 180° pulses also leads to a comparatively long experimentation time which increases the risk of image artefacts due to motions of, for example a patient to be examined. This comparatively long experimentation time is also unfavourable in view of the radiation load. In order to avoid these drawbacks, a method is proposed in which the electromagnetic pulses used are exclusively excitation pulses in the form of α° pulses, where 0 < α < 90.

Description: The invention relates to a method of determining a nuclear magnetization distribution in a region of a body which is situated in a generated, steady, uniform magnetic field, which method comprises measurement cycles including the following steps : a) influencing spin nuclei in the selected region of the body by means of high-frequency electromagnetic pulses which include α° pulses which rotate the magnetization direction of spin nuclei in the region through an angle α°, where 0 < α < 90, b) by applying a preparatory magnetic field gradient during a preparation period, c) sampling the resonance signal during a measurement period d) repeating measurement cycles each time with a different value of the time integral of the magnetic field gradient specified in paragraph b). The invention also relates to a device for determining the nuclear magnetic resonance distribution in a region of a body, comprising : a) means for generating a steady, uniform magnetic field, b) means for generating a high-frequency electromagneitc excitation pulse c) means for generating a preparatory magnetic field gradient during a preparation period, d) sampling means for taking signal samples, during a measurement period, of a resonance signal generated by the means specified in paragraphs a) and b), after conditioning of the resonance signal during a preparation period in the presence of the magnetic field gradient generated by the means specified in paragraph c), e)processing means for processing the signals supplied by the sampling means, and f) control means for controlling the means specified in paragraphs b) to e) for generating, conditioning, sampling and processing a plurality of resonance signals, each resonance signal being conditioned during a preparation period, the control means supplying the means specified in paragraph c) with control signals for adjusting the intensity and/or duration of the magnetic field gradient, the integral of the intensity over the duration of the magnetic field gradient being different after each repetition of cycles, the control means comprising programmed computer means for generating and applying control signals to the means for generating high-frequency electromagnetic pulses. Such a method is known from EP 0,137,420. Devices for determining a nuclear magnetization distribution in a region of a body and the principles on which the operation of such devices is based are known, for example from the article "Proton NMR tomography" in Philips Technical Review, Volume 41, 1983/84, no.3, pages 73-88. Reference is made to this article for the description of the construction and principles. In a method described in EP 0,137,420 a body to be examined is exposed to a strong, steady, uniform magnetic field Bo whose direction coincides with, for example the z-axis of a cartesian (x, y, z) coordinate system. The steady magnetic field Bo causes a slight polarization of the spin nuclei present in the body and enables spin nuclei to perform a precessional motion about the direction of the magnetic field Bo. After application of the magnetic field Bo a magnetic field gradient which acts as a selection gradient is applied and at the same time an α° r.f. pulse is generated which rotates the magnetization direction of the nuclei present in the selected slice through an angle α°. After termination of α° pulse, the spin nuclei will perform a processional motion about the field direction of the magnetic field Bo, thus generating a resonance signal (FID signal). After the α° pulse, there are simultaneously applied field gradients G y , G x and G z whose field direction coincides with that of the magnetic field Bo and whose gradient directions extend in the y, the x and the z direction, respectively. The field gradients G x , G y and G z serve for rephasing and coding the spin nuclei in the x, the y and the z direction, respectively. After termination of these three field gradients and after application of a 180° echo pulse, a field gradient G x is applied, an echo resonance signal of the original FID signal then being sampled. In order to obtain an image of a selected region, a measurement cycle is repeated a number of times with for each cycle a different value of the time integral of the field gradient G y and/or G z . By arranging the Fourier transforms of the resonance signals according to increasing value of the time integral of the field gradient G y on the one hand and the field gradient G z on the other hand and by subjecting these values to a Fourier transformation in the y-direction and subsequently in the z-direction, a spin density distribution will be obtained as a function of x, y and z. In accordance with the method disclosed in the Patent Application EP 0,137,420, a 180° echo pulse must be generated between the preparation and the measurement in order to generate a resonance signal, thus ensuring that a nuclear spin echo will be generated. It is a drawback of the known method that, because of the use of 180° pulses during the comparatively short period of a measurement cycle, a high-frequency load arises, which is unfavourable, for example for a patient to be examined as well as for a high-frequency pulse transmitter. Another drawback consists in that the use of 180° pulses between preparation period and measurement period and the introduction of a waiting period between successive cycles results in an unnecessarily long experimentation time because, for example no action whatsoever is undertaken during the waiting period, thus increasing the risk of artefacts in the image due to motions of, for example a patient to be examined. It is the object of the invention to provide a method and a device which enable the formation of NMR images in which the waiting period between two successive cycles can be completely or almost completely dispensed with so that, for example the spin density distribution or the longitudinal relaxation time T₁ can be determined in a faster manner in comparison with the inversion recovery method, whilst at the same time a high- r.f. load is avoided for a patient to be examined as well as for the equipment. The invention can also be used to achieve further advantages, that is to say either the highest image frequency can be amplified so that the edges of the image are defined better, or the highest image frequency can be additionally filtered so that the signal-to-noise ratio is enhanced. A method of the kind set forth in accordance with the invention is characterized in that the electromagnetic pulses used are exclusively excitation pulses in the form of α° pulses, the successive measurement cycles being directly or substantially directly consecutive, and the spin nuclei being rephased by means of a magnetic field gradient which has been inverted with respect to the magnetic field gradient applied during the preparation period. Due to the fact that a high-frequency electromagnetic α° pulse is generated, where 0 < α < 90, the magnetization M will perform a precessional motion at an angle α about the direction of the uniform, steady magnetic field Bo, so that the resonance signal ultimately obtained will be proportional to the transversal component M t of the magnetization M. This transversal component will have disappeared some time after the resonance signal, because on the one hand a field gradient present during a measurement period ensures further dephasing in the measurement direction and on other hand the magnitude of this component is reduced by T₂ relaxation. The longitudinal component M₁ of the magnetisation M, however, will meanwhile increase to its original magnitude due to T₁ relaxation. After termination of the measurement period, a similar measurement cycle can be repeated while utilizing only a very brief waiting period (in the order of magnitude of the measurement period or even no waiting period. Under the influence of a second α° pulse, the longitudinal component M₁ of the magnetization M which originally performs a precessional motion at an angle α° about the direction of the steady, uniform magnetic field Bo under the influence of the first α° pulse, now performs a precessional motion at an angle α° about the same direction. The measurement signal ultimately obtained will be proportional to the transversal component of the originally longitudinal component M₁ of the magnetization M. A preferred version of a method in accordance with the invention is characterized in that one or more sequences of a number of cycles are performed with different intensities of the excitation pulse and/or different values of a repetition period T R of successive excitation pulses. The image intensity per pixel depends on the local proton density p in the excited slice, the longitudinal relaxation time T₁, and the transversal relaxation time T₂; these quantities are roughly the three constituent components of the nuclear magnetization distribution in the layer. Using said further preferred version, two or more images of the selected slice can be obtained in which different types of tissues or tissue conditions can be recognized in the best manner because these images can be adapted to the proton density p and the relaxation time T₁ and T₂. A further version is characterized in that per measurement cycle N resonance signals are sampled during N successive measurement periods, the gradient direction of a magnetic field gradient present during a measurement period always being inverted during a subsequent measurement period. The generating of more than one resonance signal per cycle in this manner allows for the known calculation of the transversal relaxation time T₂ from the line through the logarithm of the amplitudes of the resonance signals as a function of time in a cycle. A further version is characterized in that the preparatory magnetic field gradient is inverted during the preparation period, the amplitude remaining constant and the periods t₁ and t₂ during which the preparatory magnetic field gradient and the inverse thereof, inverted during the preparation period, assume the amplitudes being variable, the sum of the periods t₁ and t₂ being equal to the preparation period. When the constant parts of the gradient waveforms are stored in digital form and the value of the gradient can be varied from one cycle to another only by means of the parameters t₁ and t₂, the computer transport time required between two cycles will be less than in cases where each time a completely new gradient waveform has to be loaded before the beginning of each cycle. A further version is characterized in that in order to dephase undesirable components of the magnetization in a measurement direction, a magnetic field gradient applied during a measurement period immediately after a resonance signal to be measured is sustained for some time immediately after expiration of a measurement period and/or a magnetic field gradient is applied for some time prior to the generating an α° pulse during a cycle. A further version is characterized in that during a period of motion of an object to be examined resonance signals are generated which correspond to different phases of the period of motion of the object, said resonance signals being processed so as to form images which can be displayed in a sequence. These so-called multiphase triggered images form a chronological representation of a complete image of the phases of a period of motion of the object (for example the heart). A further version is characterized in that the longitudinal relaxation time T₁ pervolume element is calculated from the intensities of volume elements in an image which have been obtained from at least two cycles which differ either as regards the angle α and/or the repetition time T R between two successive α° pulses. A further version is characterized in that the longitudinal relaxation time T₁ is calculated by means of the formula : in which Ip is the intensity of a volume element p, α is the angle α, T R is the repetition time T R , T₁ is the longitudinal relaxation time T₁, and c is a constant which does not depend on α, T R or T₁. When the intensities of volume elements in an image are measured from at least two cycles which differ as regards the angle α and/or the repetition time T R , the longitudinal relaxation time T₁ per volume element can be calculated, using the above formule, from at least two equations with two unknowns (that is to say Ip, α, T R are known, c and T₁ are unknown). A further version is characterized in that the magnetic field gradient applied during the preparation period contains a linear combination of two mutually perpendicular magnetic field gradients. Thus, the spin nuclei are encoded in two mutually perpendicular directions so that a three-dimensional image of an excited slice is obtained. A further version is characterized in that the resonance signals of the cycles which differ as regards the value of the time integral of the preparatory magnetic field gradient are sampled in a sequence of either increasing or decreasing absolute value of the time integral. It is thus achieved that either the highest image frequencies are amplified so that the edges in the image are better defined or the highest image frequency is additionally filtered so that the signal-to-noise ratio is reduced. A further preferred version is characterized in that there is performed a measurement during which, at an interval a preparatory r.f. electromagnetic ⊖-pulse is generated, ⊖ having an arbitrary value, and a measurement cycle which includes the steps a), b) and c) is repeated K times at K instants which differ as regards distance in time from the instant at which the r.f. electromagnetic ⊖-pulse has been generated, each time using a value of the time integral of the intensity over the duration of the preparatory magnetic field gradient. As will be demonstrated hereinafter, information as regards the longitudinal relaxation times T₁ of different chemical components in an excited region of a body can be obtained by measuring, at different instants during the longitudinal relaxation process, the instantaneous magnetization which is oriented in the transversal plane due to the influencing by the r.f. electromagnetic pulses present during the measurement cycle, said instantaneous magnetization being measured in the form of echo resonance signals. A further preferred version where the measurement cycle is repeated the K times with each time one value of the time integral of the intensity over the duration of the preparatory magnetic field gradient is characterized in that a measurement is repeated a number of times, each time using a different value of the time integral of the intensity over the duration of the preparatory magnetic field gradient. An image can thus be reconstructed at any desired instant during the longitudinal relaxation process. A further version is characterized in that the preparatory r.f. electromagnetic ⊖-pulse is an r.f. electromagnetic 180°-pulse. A device in accordance with the invention is characterized in that the control means are programmed to generate exclusively α° pulses, where 0 < α < 90, and inverted magnetic field gradients in a preparation period or a measurement period. A preferred embodiment of a device in accordance with the invention is characterized in that the sampling means sample the resonance signals of the cycles which differ as regards the value of the time integral of the preparatory magnetic field gradient in a sequence of either decreasing or increasing absolute value of the time integral. The invention will be described in detail hereinafter on the basis of a pulse sequence of an embodiment shown in figure 1, a so-called ( ° - T R ) N pulse sequence shown in figure 2, a pulse sequence of an embodiment shown in figure 3, and a flowchart of a method in accordance with the invention as shown in figure 4. A convention orthogonal system of coordinates is considered in which a steady, uniform magnetic field Bo is directed along the z-axis and a high-frequency electromagnetic field is directed along the y-axis. Also provided are coils for producing G x , G y and G z gradients in the x, the y and the z-direction, respectively. A patient is arranged in the horizontal position, the z-axis extending vertically and the y-axis extending horizontally with respect to the longitudinal direction of the patient. Hereinafter, a +, - notation, for example in G y ⁺, indicates whether the field direction of a field gradient is positive or negative, respectively. During the interval 1 in fig. 1, bounded by the instant t = -t a and t = t a , a magnetic field gradient G y ⁺ is applied and at the same time a high-frequency electromagnetic α° pulse is generated. (In practice α lies between 20 and 80 degrees). Consequently, the spin nuclei are excited in the plane Y = Y o , which means that the magnetization generated by the spin nuclei in the plane Y- = Y o performs a precessional motion at an angle α° about the z-axis. Due to the bandwidth of the α° pulse, spin nuclei will be excited not only in the plane Y=Y o , but also in the direct vicinity thereof. By variation of the frequency of the α° pulse, spin nuclei can be excited in any other plane parallel to the plane Y=Y o . During the interval 2, bounded by the instants t=t a and t=t b , three magnetic field gradients G x ⁻, G y ⁻ and G z ± are applied. In order to save time, these three field gradients are applied during the same time interval. However, because no α° pulses are generated during this interval, the effects of the field gradients can be separately considered. The negative gradient G y ⁻ rephase the spin nuclei in the y direction so that the spin nuclei which are selectively excited in and in the direct vicinity of the plane Y=Y o no longer experience phase discrimination in the y direction. Therefore it approximately holds good that (The factor ½ in the left-hand term compensates for the fact that the α° pulse acts effectively only halfway the interval bounded by the instants t = -t a and t = t a ). Thus, the maximum value of the signal to be ultimately obtained is achieved. This is because, if the individual spin nuclei were to perform a precessional motion out of phase about the z-axis, the transversal component of the magnetization, being proportional to the ultimate measurement signal, would be substantially equal to zero. The magnetic field gradients G and G z ± serve to dephase the spin nuclei in the x and the z direction, respectively. Phase encoding is thus realized in the latter direction. During the interval 3, bounded by the instants t = t b and t = t c , a positive gradient G is applied in order to rephase the spin nuclei in the x direction; these spin nuclei which will produce a spin echo in the plane Y = Y o at the instant at which the phase discrimination in the x direction terminates. This instant (t=t e1 ) is found from the following equation : After the instant t = t e1 , the spin nuclei are further dephased in the x direction by the gradient G . Because the magnetization M performs a precessional motion about the z axis at an angle α°, the resonance signal ultimately obtained will be proportional to the transversal component M t of the magnetization M. After some time, this transversal component M t will no longer be present because on the one hand the field gradient G causes further dephasing and on the other hand the magnitude of the component M t is reduced by T₂ relaxation. The longitudinal component M₁ will meanwhile have increased due to T₁ relaxation. After the instant t = t c , the same cycle can be repeated, without observing a waiting period or by observing only a brief waiting period. A high-frequency electromagnetic pulse of the next cycle causes a precessional motion at an angle α° of the longitudinal component M₁ of the magnetization M which performs a precessional motion about the z axis at an angle α° under the influence of the first α° pulse, The signal ultimately obtained is proportional to the transversal magnetization M : M = M₁ sin α (3) The longitudinal magnetization M equals : M = M₁ cos α (4) During a next cycle, the component M is again rotated through an angle α° by an α° pulse, and the signal ultimately obtained will be proportional to the transversal component of the component M. The transversal component of the component M does not contribute to the measurement signal, because the field gradient G causes further dephasing after the resonance signal so that prior to the start of a new cycle there will be no component present in the transversal (measurement) direction. The magnetic field gradient G serves to provide phase encoding in the z direction. This is because, when the field gradient G z ± is terminated at the instant t = t b , nuclei in the z direction will have the same precessional frequency but a different precessional phase. The phase angle variation experienced by a nucleus in dependence of its position in the z direction will be proportional to the local intensity of the field gradient G. The sum of all spin vector contributions N of a column of nuclei in the z direction is proportional to a specific image frequency in the z direction at the area of the column nuclei. The magnitude of this sum is proportional to the magnitude of G. By repeating the above cycle a number of times for different values of the field gradient G, a complete two-dimensional image of a selected slice in the z-x plane can be obtained. It is definitely not necessary to start a new measurement cycle after the instant t = t c . By inverting the gradient direction of a magnetic field gradient G present during the measurement period (tb-tc) during a subsequent measurement period, a second resonance signal can be generated and sampled at the instant t = t e2 . Figure 2 shows a so-called (α° - T R ) N pulse sequence, i.e. a sequence of N α° pulses which are successively generated at intervals T R . When the magnetization M is directed along the z axis for the first α° pulse and the transversal magnetization M t is substantially equal to zero just before each α° pulse due to dephasing and relaxation, the following relation holdss good for the transversal magnetization M tN immediately after the N th α° pulse : in which T R is the repetition period, T₁ is the longitudinal relaxation time, M to is the transversal magnetization for N=0, and M te is a transversal equilibrium magnetization. As appears from the equation (5), the transversal magnetisation M tN tends towards a transversal equilibrium magnetization after N α° pulses. This effect is referred to as a "switch-on" effect. When after each α° pulse of (α° - T R ) N pulse series resonance signals are generated by means of the gradients as used in the embodiment shown in figure 1 and these resonance signals are sampled in a sequence of decreasing value of the field gradient G z ± , in respect of the value of the second field gradient G z ± , the amplitudes of the resonance signals corresponding to comparatively high values of G z ± will be relatively amplified as appears from the equation (5). This implies amplification of the highest image frequencies and hence better definition of the edges in the image. However, when the signals measured at the beginning of the pulse sequence are multiplied by such a factor (smaller than one) that this amplification is eliminated (for a mean or assumed value of T₁), such better definition will not be obtained; however, the noise content of the image, notably in the high-frequency part of the spectrum, will then be reduced accordingly. Figure 3 shows a pulse sequence which includes, at an interval, a preparatory r.f. electromagnetic 180°-­ pulse and, in this case two, identical measurement cycles. (In practice, however, a substantially larger number of measurement cycles will be executed during the pulse sequence). Such measurement cycles have already been described with reference to Figure 1. It is to be noted that the preparatory r.f. electromagnetic pulse, gnenerated during interval 1 which is bounded by the instants t = -t a and t = t a1 , can selectively excite spins when a magnetic selection field gradient is applied at the same time. During interval t₂, bounded by the instants t =t a and t = t b the excited spins of the various chemical components in the body will be reoriented in the direction of the steady, uniform magnetic field at a speed which will depend on their respective longitudinal relaxation times T₁. Information as regards these longitudinal relaxation times can be obtained by measuring, at different instants (t = t c , t = t d , etc.) during this relaxation process, the instantaneous magnetization which is situated in the transversal xy-plane due to the influencing of the r.f. electromagnetic pulses α₁, α₂, etc. as echo resonance signals at the instants t = t e1 , t = t e2 etc. Thus, at any instant t = t c , t = t d etc. an image can be reconstructed by repeating the pulse sequence of figure 3 a number of times, each time using a different value of the time integral of the intensity over the duration of the preparatory magnetic field gradient G z + . The image associated with the instant t = t c and the instant t = t d then represents the relaxation time T₁-dependent intensities of the resonance signals at the instants t = t c and t = t d , respectively. From a graph in which the intensity is plotted as a function of time, perpixel K different T₁-values and the K corresponding densities can be determined if at least 2K different images have been reconstructed at 2K different instants. The reference numeral 1 in Figure 4 denotes an initiation unit in which, prior to an experiment, the reference values of parameters which are fixed during the experiment are introduced. These reference values may relates to, for example amplitudes of magnetic field gradients used, a total number of N echo resonance signals to be generated (for example, N=128 or 256), an echo resonance signal number m and a sampling frequency. In 2 an echo resonance signal number m is determined which is equal to the reference value of the number m plus one. Subsequently, in 3 a field gradient G is applied and an α° pulse is generated. Subsequently, in 4 fields gradients G, G and M Δ G z ± are generated. Subsequently, in 3 a field gradient G is applied and the resonance signal is sampled. Depending on whether more than one echo resonance signal is to be generated and sampled in one cycle, the field gradient G is inverted in 6; thus, an echo resonance signal is generated which is sampled. When the total number of N resonance signals suitable for the formation of an image has not been generated and sampled during the experiment, in other words m<N, a new cycle will be started. When m = N, the experiment is stopped.

Claims: 1. A method of determining a nuclear magnetization distribution in a region of a body which is situated in a gene rated, steady, uniform magnetic field, which method comprises measurement cycles including the steps a), b) and c): a) influencing spin nuclei in the selected region of the body by means of high-frequency electromagnetic pulses which include α° pulses which rotate the magnetization direction of spin nuclei in the region through an angle α°, where 0<α< 90, b) by applying a preparatory magnetic field gradient during a preparation period, c) sampling the resonance signal during a measurement period, d) repeating measurement cycles including the steps a), b) and c) each time with a different value of the time integral of the magnetic field gradien specified in para­ graph b), characterized in that the electromagnetic pulses used are exclusively excitation pulses in the form of α° pulses, the successive measurement cycles being directly or substantially directly consecutive, and the spin nuclei being rephased by means of a magnetic field gradient which has been inverted with respect to the magnetic field gradient applied during the preparation period. 2. A method as claimed in Claim 1, characterized in that one or more sequences of a number of cycles are performed with different intensities of the excitation pulse and/or different values of a repetition period TR of successive excitation pulses. 3. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims, characterized in that per measurement cycle N resonance signals are sampled during N successive measurement periods, the gradient direction of a magnetic field gradient present during a measurement period always being inverted during a subsequent measurement period. 4. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims, characterized in that the preparatory magnetic field gradient is inverted during the preparation period, the amplitude remaining constant and the periods t₁ and t₂ during which the preparatory magnetic field gradient and the inverse thereof, inverted during the preparation period, assume the amplitudes, being variable, the sum of the periods t₁ + t₂ being equal to the preparation period. 5. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims, characterized in that in order to dephase undesirable components of the magnetization in a measurement direction, a magnetic field gradient applied during a measurement period immediately after a resonance signal to be measured is sustained for some time immediately after expiration of a measurement period and/or a magnetic field gradient is applied for some time prior to the generating of an α° pulse during a cycle. 6. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims, characterized in that during a period of motion of an object to be examined resonance signals are generated which correspond to different phases of the period of motion of the object, said resonance signals being processed so as to form images which can be displayed in a sequence. 7. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims, characterized in the longitudinal relaxation time T₁ per volume element is calculated from the intensities of volume elements in an image which have been obtained from at least two cycles which differ either as regards the angle α and/or the repetition time TR between two successive α° pulses. 8. A method as claimed in Claim 7, characterized in that the longitudinal relaxation time T₁ is calculated by means of the formula in which Ip is the intensity of a volume element p, α is the angle α, TR is the repetition time TR, T₁ is the longitudinal relaxation time T₁, and c is a constant which does not depend on α, TR or T₁. 9. A method as claimed in Claim 1, characterized in that the magnetic field gradient applied during the preparation period contains a linear combination of two mutually perpendicular magnetic field gradients. 10. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims, characterized in that the resonance signals of the cycles which differ as regards the value of the time integral of the preparatory magnetic field gradient are sampled in a sequence of either increasing or decreasing absolute value of the time integral. 11. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims, characterized in that there is performed a measurement during which, at an interval, a preparatory r.f. electromagnetic ⊖-pulse is generated, ⊖ having an arbitrary value, and a measurement cycle which includes the steps a), b) and c) is repeated K times at K instants which differ as regards distance in time from the instant at which the r.f. electromagnetic ⊖-pulse has been generated, each time using a value of the time integral of the intensity over the duration of the preparatory magnetic field gradient. 12. A method as claimed in Claim 11 where the measurement cycle is repeated the K time with each time onevalue of the time integral of the intensity over the duration of the preparatory magnetic field gradient, characterized in that a measurement is repeated a number of times, each time using a different value of the time integral of the intensity over the duration of the preparatory magnetic field gradient. 13. A method as claimed in Claim 11 or 12, characterized in that the preparatory electromagnetic ⊖-pulse is an r.f. electromagnetic 180°-pulse. 14. A device for determining the nuclear magnetization distribution in a region of a body, comprising: a) means for generating a steady, uniform magnetic field, b) means for generating a high-frequency electromagnetic excitation pulse, c) means for generating a preparatory magnetic field gradient during a preparation period, d) sampling means for taking signal samples, during a measurement period, of a resonance signal generated by the means specified in paragraphs a) and b), after conditioning of the resonance signal during a preparation period in the presence of the magnetic field gradient generated by the means specified in paragraph c), e) processing means for processing the signals supplied by the sampling means, and f) control means for controlling the means specified in paragraphs b) and e) for generating, conditioning, sampling and processing a plurality of resonance signals, each resonance signal being invariably conditioned during a preparation period, the control means supplying the means specified in paragraph c) with control signals for adjusting the intensity and/or duration of the magnetic field gradient, the integral of the intensity over the duration of the magnetic field gradient being different after each repetition of cycles, the control means comprising programmed computer means for generating and applying control signals to the means for generating high-frequency electromagnetic pulses, characterized in that the control means are programmed to generated exclusively α° pulses, where 0<α<90, and inverted magnetic field gradients in a preparation period or a measurement period. 15. A device as claimed in Claim 14, characterized in that the sampling means sample the resonance signals of the cycles which differ as regards the value of the time integral of the preparatory magnetic field gradient in a sequence of either decreasing or increasing absolut e value of the time integral.

Inventors: CUPPEN JOHANNES JOSEPHUS MARIA, GROEN JOHANNES PETRUS, MEULEN PETER VAN DER, CUPPEN, JOHANNES JOSEPHUS MARIA, GROEN, JOHANNES PETRUS, VAN DER MEULEN, PETER
Applicants: KONINKL PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NV, N.V. PHILIPS' GLOEILAMPENFABRIEKEN
Application year: 1986
Main classification: G01N24
IPC codes: G01R33