AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEM FOR THERMAL POWER PLANT

Abstract: An automatic control system for a thermal power plant comprises a master controller (201) controlling a turbine in response to an externally applied load command signal, and producing a boiler input command signal by correcting the load command signal on the basis of the detected pressure of main steam generated from a boiler, and a water/steam process controller (202), a fuel process controller (203), a combustion process controller (204) and a draft process controller (205) to all of which the boiler input command signal is applied from the master controller. The process controllers (202, 203, 204, 205) apply control signals to equipments controlling a water/steam process, a fuel pro­ cess, a combustion process and a draft process respectively among the terminal actuating equipments of the various parts of the boiler.

Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to an automatic control system for a thermal power plant, and more particularly to an automatic control system of the kind described above which is effective for lessening mutual interference between individual processes and suitable for application to decentralized control of unit processes. In order that a thermal power plant generates a desired electrical output, it is necessary to control process variables such as quantities of fuel, feed water and air, thereby generating steam at a temperature and a pressure matching the desired electrical output. However, the process variables described above are greatly inter-related with one another, and it is difficult to attain stable control of all the process variables at the same time. For example, an increase in the quantity of feed water results in a corresponding decrease in the temperature of main steam. In order to compensate for this temperature drop of main steam, the quantity of fuel must be increased, and, at the same time, air must be supplied in a quantity corresponding to the increased quantity of fuel. As described above, the process variables are closely inter-related with one another. Because of the close interrelation among the process variables, an automatic control system of very complex structure is required for the control of the thermal power plant. As a prior art example of such a control system, a system having a structure as described below is reported in a magazine entitled "Hitachi Review" Vol. 65, No. 9 (1983 - 9), pp. 603 - 608. In the method employed in the reported system, controlling the opening of a turbine inlet control valve is controlled according to a load command signal applied to the thermal power plant. On the other hand, at the boiler side, the flow rate of feed water to the boiler is controlled according to a boiler input command signal obtained by correcting the load command signal by adding thereto a pressure compensating signal produced by subjecting a deviation of the main steam pressure from its desired value to proportional plus integral operation, and a fuel flow-rate is controlled according to a fuel command signal obtained by correcting the boiler input command signal by adding thereto a temperature compensating signal produced by subjecting a deviation of the main steam temperature from its desired value to proportional plus integral operation. Further, flow-rates of feeding gas and air are controlled by an air flow-rate command signal obtained by correcting the fuel command signal by adding thereto an oxygen concentration signal produced by subjecting a deviation of the oxygen concentration in the furnace draft gas from its desired value to proportional plus integral operation. According to the prior art method described above, main steam of good quality can be generated as a result of the control. However, the reported system is defective in that a large length of time is required until finally all of the interrelated process variables are properly corrected thereby to completely stabilize the electrical output of the plant. Also, even when the electrical output of the plant is stabilized, many terminal equipments relating to the plant control may be still unstable, resulting in a low efficiency of the plant as a whole. Further, when any one of the compensation signal generating sections for obtaining the signals used for correcting the flow rates of feed water, fuel, gas and air on the basis of the detected pressure and temperature of main steam and concentration of oxygen in furnace gases fails to normally operate or becomes abnormal, for example, when the compensation signal generating section relating to the pressure of main steam becomes abnormal, all of feed water, fuel, gas and air control sections downstream of the abnormal compensation signal generating section are adversely affected. This means that a multiplex control system arrangement or a decentralized control system arrangement must be adopted in order to ensure the reliability of the control system, resulting inevitably in an expensive system. US-A-4 319 320 discloses an automatic control system for a thermal plant with the features set forth in the first part of claim 1. That system includes a number of sub-loop controllers which are controlled separately by a master controller, but are interconnected by function generators, so that the output signals from these controllers are not generated independent from each other, with the disadvantages set forth above. The same applies with respect to the control system of US-A-3 894 396, where error signals are introduced into various computing units included in a number of controllers which thus again do not operate independently of each other. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to provide an automatic control system for a thermal power plant in which individual processes, specifically the water/steam, fuel, combustion and draft processes, are independently controlled so that they are least interrelated with each other. This object is met by the system characterized in claim 1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 is a block diagram showing the structure of a preferred embodiment of the automatic plant control system according to the present invention. Fig. 2 is a diagrammatic view showing the structure of a thermal power plant to which the present invention is applied. Figs. 3a to 3h show the output characteristics of the function generators, respectively, with respect to the boiler input command. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT A thermal power plant to which the present invention is applied has a structure as schematically shown in Fig. 2. Referring to Fig. 2, the thermal power plant includes a boiler 1 shown by the one-dot chain lines, a turbine 2, a generator 3, a feed water pump 4 including pumps 4a, 4b, 4c, spray valves 5, fuel valves 6a, 6b, forced draft fans 7a, 7b and gas recirculating fans 8a, 8b. Air preheaters 301a and 301b preheat combustion air by heat exchange with combustion exhaust gases. A burner part 302 is divided into a plurality of burner stages in each of which the air-fuel ratio is controlled for the purpose of furnace denitration. Window-box inlet air dampers 303 regulate the flow rate of combustion air in the respective burner stages. Mixing gas (GM gas) dampers 304 regulate the flow rate of combustion exhaust gases injected into combustion air. Primary gas dampers 305 regulate the flow rate of combustion exhaust gases injected directly into the burner part 302. The thermal power plant further includes a condenser 306, low-pressure feed water heaters 307, a deaerator 308, a feed water valve 309, a high-pressure feed water heater 310, an evaporator 311, a primary superheater 312, a first-stage desuperheater 313, a secondary super-heater 314, a second-stage desuperheater 315, a tertiary superheater 316, a reheater 317, and a turbine inlet control valve 330. When classified according to variables related to the operation of the boiler, the thermal power plant is divided into four processes, that is, a combustion process 9, a water/steam process 10, a fuel process 11 and a draft process 12. The structure of the thermal power plant shown in Fig. 2 is not an especial one, and the control system of the present invention which will be described in detail now is widely applicable to thermal power plants presently put into practical use. A preferred embodiment of the plant control system according to the present invention will be described with reference to Fig. 1. Referring to Fig. 1, the plant control system embodying the present invention comprises a master controller 201, a first process controller 202 controlling the water/steam process 10 shown in Fig. 2, a second process controller 203 controlling the fuel process 11 shown in Fig. 2, a third process controller 204 controlling the combustion process 9 shown in Fig. 2, and a fourth process controller 205 controlling the draft process 12 shown in Fig. 2. These controllers 201 to 205 are process-level controllers. The plant control system further comprises a speed governing controller 206 controlling the main turbine 2, controllers 207a to 207c controlling the respective pumps 4a to 4c of the feed water pump 4, controllers 208a and 208b controlling the spray valves 5 associated with the second-stage desuperheater 315, controllers 209a and 209b controlling the spray valves 5 associated with the first-stage desuperheater 313, a controller 210 controlling the flow rate of fuel supplied to main burners M, a controller 211 controlling the flow rate of fuel supplied to planet burners P controllers 212a to 212n controlling the flow rates of air and recirculated gas and also controlling the burners in the respective burner stages, controllers 213a and 213b controlling the respective forced draft fans 7a and 7b, and controllers 214a and 214b controlling the respective gas recirculating fans 8a and 8b. These controllers 206 to 214 are equipment-level controllers. Generally, an electric power generation company has a central load-dispatching station which decides the outputs of its associated power plants based on the total power demand required to be supplied by the company and transmits power instruction signals corresponding to the decided power outputs, respectively, to the power plants. The power generation of each power station is controlled based on the power instruction transmitted thereto such that its actual power generation dsoe not exceed upper and lower limits predetermined with respect to a power level represented by the power instruction. In Fig. 2, such a central load-dispatching station is shown by a reference numeral 40, from which the power instruction is applied to the master controller 201 in which a circuit 41 produces, based on the power instruction indicating merely a specific power level, a ramp-shaped load command signal Ld having a predetermined load variation rate by taking into account the present status of that power plant as well as the above-mentioned upper and lower limits. The power generation of the power plant is controlled based on the load command Ld thus produced. This load command signal Ld is compared in a subtractor 42 with a signal 43 indicative of the detected electrical output of the generator 3. The resultant output signal of the subtractor 42 is applied to a circuit 44 making proportional plus integral operation, and the output signal of the proportional plus integral circuit 44 is applied through a selector 45 to the main turbine controller 206 to control the turbine inlet control valve 330 shown in Fig. 2. The selector 45 is switched over by an interlock described later. A detector 46 detects the pressure of main steam (the pressure of main steam at the boiler outlet). A signal indicative of the detected steam pressure is compared in a subtractor 47 with a setting supplied from a setting circuit 48, and the output signal indicative of the error therebetween is applied to a circuit 49 making proportional plus integral operation. The output signal Lp of the proportional plus integral circuit 49, which has the same dimension as that of the load command, is added in an adder 50 to the load command signal Ld to provide a boiler input command signal L B . The output signal Lp of the proportional plus integral circuit 49 is also applied to the main turbine controller 206 through the selector 45. This selector 45 is switched over depending on the operation mode of the plant. More precisely, the operation of the thermal power plant is classified into two modes, that is a coordination mode in which both the control of the main turbine and the control of the feeding water, fuel supply or the like of the boiler are carried out by the load command signal and a turbine follow-up mode in which only the control of the boiler side is carried out by the load command signal and if the resultant main steam pressure is deviated from its desired value, the opening of the turbine inlet control valve is controlled so as to obtain the desired pressure value. Thus, in the turbine follow-up mode, in which the pressure of main steam may be controlled by the turbine inlet control valve 330, the output signal of the selector 45 is the input signal applied from the proportional plus integral circuit 49. On the other hand, in the coordination mode, the output signal of the proportional plus integral circuit 44 appears directly as the output signal of the selector 45. The output of the adder 50 is the boiler input command signal L B provided by adding the signal Lp, indicative of the amount of correction of the error of the main steam pressure from the setting, to the plant load command signal Ld appearing from the circuit 41, and this boiler input command signal L B is applied to all of the process controllers 202 to 205. The water/steam process controller 202 includes a first function generator 215 which is programmed to produce a feed-water flow-rate command signal as a function of the boiler input command signal L B which is the output of the adder 50, as shown in Fig. 3a. A signal 66 indicative of the detected flow rate of feed water is compared in a subtractor 216 with the feed-water flow-rate command signal which is the output of the function generator 215, and a signal indicative of the error therebetween is applied to a proportional plus integral circuit 217. The output of this proportional plus integral circuit 217 provides a feed-water pump flow-rate command signal Lw. This command signal Lw is distributed by a load distribution control circuit 218 to the individual feed-water pump controllers 207a to 207c which control the pumps 4a, 4b and feed water valve 309 respectively. That is, in Fig. 1, the output of the proportional plus integral circuit 217 is the command signal for the feeding water flow-rate. However, generally the feeding water is controlled by a plurality of water pumps and hence the output of the circuit 217 is divided by the load distribution control circuit 218 into individual command signals for controlling the outputs of the respective water pumps by taking into account the capacities of the respective pumps as well as the present status in operation of the pumps. A second function generator 219 is programmed to produce a signal indicative of the desired temperature of main steam as a function of the boiler input command signal L B as shown in Fig. 3b. A signal 52 indicative of the detected temperature of main steam is compared in a subtractor 220 with the temperature setting provided by the output signal of the function generator 219, and the resultant signal indicative of the error therebetween is applied to a proportional plus integral circuit 221. A third function generator 222 is programmed to produce a signal indicative of an opening of the spray valve, which determines the outlet temperature of the second-stage desuperheater 315, as a function of the boiler input command signal L B , as shown in Fig. 3c. The output signal of the function generator 222 is added in an adder 223 to the output signal of the proportional plus integral circuit 221 indicative of the amount of correction of the error of the detected main steam temperature from the setting. The output of the adder 223 provides a signal indicative of the setting of the outlet temperature of the second-stage desuperheater 315. Such a signal is applied to the desuperheater outlet temperature controllers 208a and 208b to control the flow rate of spray supplied through the spray valves 5 to the second-stage desuperheater 315. In the water/steam process controller 202, a fourth function generator 224, which is similar to the function generator 219 is programmed to produce a signal indicative of the outlet temperature of the secondary superheater 314 shown in Fig. 2, as a function of the boiler input command signal L B . The output signal of the proportional plus plus integral circuit 221 is indicative of the amount of correction of the outlet temperature of the second-stage desuperheater 315 due to the error of the detected temperature of main steam from the setting. This output signal is applied to a correction circuit 225. The correction circuit 225 corrects the setting of the outlet temperature of the secondary superheater 314 (the output signal of the function generator 224) on the basis of the signal applied from the proportional plus integral circuit 221 so as to attain a balance between the sprays supplied to the first-stage and second-stage desuperheaters 313 and 315. That is, this balance may be unnecessary if the boiler characteristics are good. However, when the boiler characteristics are changed due to some reasons such as ageing, the output of the function generator is modified by the correction circuit 225 to obtain the balance between the sprays as supplied. A signal 226 indicative of the detected outlet temperature of the secondary superheater 314 is compared in a subtractor 227 with the corrected setting signal applied from the correction circuit 225, and the resultant signal indicative of the error therebetween is applied to a proportional plus integral circuit 228. A fifth function generator 229, which is similar to the function generator 222, is programmed to produce a signal for determining the outlet temperature of the first-stage desuperheater 313 as a function of the boiler input command signal L B . The output signal of the proportional plus integral circuit 228 indicative of the amount of correction of the outlet temperature of the secondary superheater 314 is added in an adder 230 to the output signal of the function generator 229 to provide a signal indicative of the setting of the outlet temperature of the first-stage desuperheater 313, and the output signal of the adder 230 is applied to the desuperheater outlet temperature controllers 209a and 209b which control the flow rate of spray supplied through the spray valves 5 to the first-stage desuperheater 313. The fuel process controller 203 includes a sixth function generator 231 which is programmed to produce a fuel flow-rate command signal L F as a function of the boiler input command signal L B , as shown in Fig. 3d. The output signal of the function generator 231 is applied to a correction circuit 233 for the purpose of constant spray control. A fuel distribution circuit 234 distributes the fuel flow-rate command signal L F to the fuel valve 6b for the main burners M and to the fuel valve 6a for the planet burners P. A signal 73 indicative of the detected flow rate of fuel supplied to the main burners M is compared in a subtractor 235 with the command signal applied from the fuel distribution circuit 234, and the resultant signal is applied to a proportional plus integral circuit 236 which produces a command signal applied to the main-burner fuel flow-rate controller 210. Also, a signal 75 indicative of the detected flow rate of fuel supplied to the planet burners P is compared in a subtractor 237 with the command signal applied from the fuel distribution circuit 234, and the resultant signal is applied to a proportional plus integral circuit 238 which produces a command signal applied to the planet-burner fuel flow-rate controller 211. The fuel process controller 204 includes a seventh function generator 239 which is programmed to produce an air flow-rate command signal L A as a function of the boiler input command signal L B , as shown in Fig. 3e. An eighth function generator 240 is programmed to produce a signal for setting the concentration of O₂ in exhaust gases as a function of the boiler input command signal L B , as shown in Fig. 3f. A signal 58 indicative of the detected O₂ concentration is compared in a subtractor 241 with the setting applied from the function generator 240, and the resultant signal is applied to a proportional plus integral circuit 242. The output signal of the proportional plus integral circuit 242 is applied together with the air flow-rate command signal L A from the function generator 239 to a correction circuit 243. In the correction circuit 243, the air flow-rate command signal L A is corrected to provide a corrected air flow-rate command signal L AA . A signal 63 indicative of the detected total flow rate of air is compared in a subtractor 244 with the setting signal applied from the correction circuit 243, and the resultant signal is applied to a proportional plus integral circuit 245 to appear as a signal indicative of the corrected flow rate of air to be supplied to each of the burner stages. Such a command signal is applied to each of the air and gas flow-rate controllers 212a to 212n. The output signals of the controllers 212a to 212n control the window-box inlet air dampers 303, GM dampers 304 and primary gas dampers 305 respectively. On the basis of the boiler input command signal L B , a circuit 247 determines the optimum number of burners and the optimum pattern for each of the burner stages. An advanced control circuit 248 prevents an unbalance between the flow rates of air and fuel at the time of ignition and extinction of the burners. In the draft process controller 205, a ninth function generator 249 is programmed to produce a signal for setting the flow rate of draft at the outlets of the forced draft fans (FDF) 7a and 7b as a function of the boiler input command signal L B , as shown in Fig. 3g. A signal 100 indicative of the detected flow rate of draft at the outlets of the forced draft fans 7a and 7b is compared in a subtractor 250 with the setting signal applied from the function generator 249, and the resultant signal is applied to a proportional plus integral circuit 251. The proportional plus integral circuit 251 produces a command signal commanding the angular position of the rotor blades of the forced draft fans 7a and 7b, and this command signal is applied to the forced draft fan controllers 213a and 213b through a load distribution circuit 252, thereby controlling the forced draft fans 7a and 7b. A tenth function generator 253 is programmed to produce a signal for setting the flow rate of draft at the outlets of gas recirculating fans (GRF) 8a and 8b as a function of the boiler input command signal L B , as shown in Fig. 3h. A signal 106 indicative of the detected flow rate of draft at the outlets of the gas recirculating fans 8a and 8b is compared in a subtractor 254 with the setting signal applied from the function generator 253, and the resultant signal is applied to a proportional plus integral circuit 255. The proportional plus integral circuit 255 produces a command signal commanding the opening of the inlet dampers of the gas recirculating fans 8a and 8b, and this command signal is applied to the gas recirculating fan controllers 214a and 214b through a load distribution circuit 256, thereby controlling the gas recirculating fans 8a and 8b. The advantages of the plant control system embodying the present invention will now be described. Objects to be controlled by the master controller 201 are limited to the load and the pressure of main steam, and the boiler input command signal L B only is applied from the master controller 201 to the process controllers 202 to 205. The process controllers 202 to 205 can simultaneously set the controlled parameters for the associated equipments in response to the application of the boiler input command signal L B . Thus, the characteristics in response of the system are improved as compared with the prior system in which the various parameters are set successively upon receiving the load command signal. Further, for that reasons, the correction control of a parameter of a certain processor relative to the other processor is almost unnecessary, resulting in improved stability in operation of the system. The equipment controllers belonging to some of the process controllers control a plurality of same equipments. Therefore, the so-called N : l design, where design of one controller is applicable to N controllers, can be realized to standardize and simplify the design. Further, the control of the flow rates of air and gas and the control of the burner in each burner stage of the boiler can be attained by one and the same controller, thereby greatly decreasing the number of required signal lines. It will be understood from the foregoing detailed description of the present invention that unit processes and unit equipments in a thermal power plant can be independently controlled with least mutual interference therebetween. According to the present invention, the master controller participates in the control of the load and the control of the pressure of main steam, and a boiler input command signal only is applied from the master controller to the process controllers. In response to the application of the boiler input command signal, the process controllers control the associated processes independently of one another and control also the load distribution to their subordinate equipment controllers. The so-called N : l design of the equipment controllers belonging to some of the process controllers can be realized to permit standardization of the design. Therefore, the present invention provides a plant control system which can operate with high reliability and can be easily designed without redundancy of the master and process controllers.

Claims: An automatic control system for a thermal power plant, comprising a master controller (201) for generating a boiler input command signal (LB) in response to a load command signal (Ld) externally applied to the power plant, and a plurality of process controllers (202...205) including a water/steam process controller (202), a fuel process controller (203), a combustion process controller (204) and a draft process controller (205) for controlling process parameters including water, fuel and air flows, each process controller receiving said boiler input command signal (LB) and detected signals indicative of the status of said process parameters, for generating process command signals which represent target values of the respective process parameters for generating the desired power, characterized in that said process controllers (202...205) generate their command signals based on said boiler input command signal (LB) independently of each other, and that said load command signal (Ld) is corrected by comparing it with a feed-back signal indicative of the detected main steam pressure of the boiler, thereby producing said boiler input command signal (LB). The system of claim 1, further comprising equipments (4a, 4b, 309, 5, 6b, 6a, 309 ... 305, 7a, 7b, 8a, 8b) which are driven by the respective control signals for controlling said process parameters.

Inventors: SUGANO, AKIRA, YAMANOBE, SACHIO
Applicants: HITACHI ENGINEERING CO., LTD., HITACHI, LTD.
Application year: 1986
Main classification: F01K13
IPC codes: F01K13, F22B35, F01K3