Semiconductor lasers

Abstract: The emission linewidth of a semiconductor laser can be reduced by operating it at a wavelength which is less than the wavelength of maximum gain at the threshold current, λ max. An assembly for carrying out such operation comprises a ridge waveguide laser provided with a distributed feedback (DFB) grating 9. The period of the grating 9 is selected to give a predetermined emission wavelength to the laser which is shorter than λ max. The invention finds application in optical communications, particularly in coherent systems.

Description: The present invention relates to semiconductor lasers and finds application in optical communications, particularly in coherent systems. The radiation used in optical communications is not necessarily in the visible region, and the words "optical" and "light" when used in this specification are not to be interpreted as implying any such limitation. Indeed, if silica optical fibres are used as the transmission medium, infra-red radiation if of especial usefulness because the loss minima occur in such fibres at 1.3µm and 1.55µm approximately. Semiconductor laser structures includes a p-n junction across which current flows (the conventional current from p to n) and an "active layer" in which electrons and holes combine with the production of photons by stimulated emission. The active layer has to relate suitably in band gap and refractive index to the other semiconductor regions of the structure in order to achieve a suitable degree of "confinement" of these processes to the active layer. The layers of material to either side of the active layer and in contact with the opposite faces of the active layer are known as "confinement layers". A major field of application of semiconductor optical devices is in optical fibre communications systems. Silica optical fibres as produced in recent years have loss minima at 1.3µm and 1.55µm approximately, the latter minimum being the deeper. Accordingly, there is an especial need for devices operating in the range from 1.1 to 1.65µm, especially from 1.3 to 1.6µm. (These wavelengths, like all the wavelengths herein except where the context indicates otherwise, are in vacuo wavelengths). Semiconductor lasers operating in this region of the infra-red usually comprise regions of indium phosphide and of quaternary materials, indium gallium arsenide phosphides (In x Ga 1-x As y P 1-y ). By suitable choices of x and y it is possible to lattice-match the various regions while varying the band gaps of the materials. (Band gaps can be determined experimentally by, for example, photoluminescence). Additionally, both indium phosphide and the quaternary materials can be doped to be p- or n- type as desired. Semiconductor lasers comprising regions of gallium aluminium arsenide and gallium arsenide are also used for communications purposes. These operate near to 0.9µm. The photons produced by stimulated emission, when a laser is driven at a current above a threshold current, are caused by the design of the laser to oscillate in a direction along it, in the active layer, before being emitted. During each passage through the material of the active layer the number of photons is increased to a degree determined by the balance between gain and losses in the active layer. The gain shows a peaked spectrum against emission wavelength and there is clearly an advantage in working at the gain peak of the material of the active layer. In a Fabry-Perot laser, oscillation is caused by at least partially reflecting end-faces of the laser structure, lying at either end of the active layer. In a distributed feedback (DFB) laser, oscillation is caused by corrugations which lie in the region of the active layer, extending generally perpendicular to the length of the laser structure, the corrugations reflecting radiation in each direction along the laser structure. Structures external to the laser can also contribute to oscillation by reflecting radiation back into the laser. Such structures includes external cavities and distributed Bragg reflectors (DBR). External cavities may for instance comprise a mirror placed at a preselected distance along the emission axis. Alternatively radiation may be reflected back into the laser by means of corrugations, similar to those of a DFB laser but shifted to a position outside the laser, adjacent to the emission axis. Lasers having the latter external structure are known as distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) lasers. In some applications, particularly coherent optical communications, it is important that the emitted radiation shows a narrow linewidth. This allows coherent detection systems, such as heterodyne or homodyne detection, to be used and much greater amounts of data to be transmitted as a consequence. Fabry-Perot lasers have been found unsuitable, having linewidths of more than 100 MHz. It is known that DFB lasers can be fabricated having narrower emission linewidths than those of unmodified Fabry-Perot lasers, and that additional structures such as external cavities can result in narrowed emission linewidths. In the paper "Measurements of the Linewidth of Ridge-Guide DFB Lasers", by I D Henning, L D Westbrook et al, Electronics letters 11.10.84 20 (21) pp 885-887, a laser structure is described which emits radiation at 1.47µm with a measured linewidth of 3 MHz. The true linewidth is estimated to be 1 MHz. The structure concerned is a ridge-guide, distributed feedback (DFB) laser with an external cavity. However emission linewidth has tended to remain an unpredictable characteristic of different laser structures. Considerable work has been done in trying to assess the factors which control linewidth in a laser. In the paper "Theory of the Linewidth of Semiconductor Lasers" by Charles H Henry IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, QE-18 (2), February 1982 pp 259-264, a theory is presented which arrives at a broadening term (1 + α ²), α being a fundamental parameter of the laser active material sometime known as the linewidth enhancement factor. As well as linewidth, α has been shown to effect the degree of transient wavelength chirping in directly modulated lasers. There has been found, however, substantial ambiguity in the magnitude of α in long wavelength lasers. Values of α ranging from 2.2 to 6.6 have been measured or inferred. Further, a systematic dependence of α on laser length has been reported but unexplained. This latter effect is described in "Measurements of the Semiconductor Laser Linewidth Broadening Factor" by Henning and Collins, Electronics Letters 1983 19 pages 927-929. In the paper "On the Linewidth Enhancement Factor in Semiconductor Injection Lasers", by K Vahala et al, Applied Physics Letters 42 (8), 15 April 1983, it is predicted that in undoped Ga As, α will decrease with increasing excitation frequency. Work has now been done, in making the present invention, by means of which practical embodiments of lasers may be designed which exploit a relationship between emission linewidth and operating wavelength. Significant improvements in the emission linewidths of lasers useful in optical communications for instance those having emission wavelengths of 1.3 and 1.55µm, can be achieved. It is an object of the present invention to provide semiconductor laser assemblies which have reduced emission linewidths. According to the present invention there is provided a laser assembly comprising a semiconductor laser structure and means for selecting the emission wavelength, λe, of the laser structure, the selected wavelength being shorter than the wavelength of maximum gain at the threshold current, λ max, whereby said means does not consist of a Fabry Perot resonator formed between two end facets of the semiconductor laser structure, λe lies in one of the ranges 1.2 to 1.35 µm and 1.48 to 1.65 µm, and the selected wavelength is shorter than λ max by an amount such that the linewidth enhancement factor at λ max, αmax, and the linewidth enhancement factor at the wavelength of the emitted radiation, αe, are related in the manner αe ≦ 0.9 αmax. Preferably the selected wavelength is shorter than λ max by an amount such that α max and α e are related in the manner α e ≦ 0.8 α max and even more preferably, such that ∝ e ≦ 0.7 α max. Advantageously the means for selecting the emission wavelength comprises a structure which in itself will encourage a narrow linewidth emission from the laser assembly, such as a distributed feedback grating or an external cavity. More advantageously, the means for selecting the emission wavelength comprises a combination of structures which each in themselves encourage a narrow linewidth emission from the laser assembly, such as a distributed feedback grating in combination with an external cavity. Preferably laser assemblies according to the invention may be used in coherent optical communication systems. Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying Figures in which: Figure 1 shows a three-quarter view of a laser according to an embodiment of the present invention; and Figure 2 shows in graph form the relationship between the linewidth enhancement factor α and photon energy in a laser. It should be noted that Figure 1 is schematic and is not drawn to a scale. In the following description, and elsewhere in this specification, terms such as "on top of" and "underside" are used. These terms are used for convenience only and should not be taken to denote a particular orientation of any device unless it is clear from the context that a particular orientation is intended. Referring to Figure 1, the laser is of the type described in our European patent application number 85301599.8, ie. a DFB ridge waveguide laser. The substrate 1 is a heavily S-doped InP (n⁺-type) substrate approximately 100µm thick. Onto the (100) face is grown a first confinement layer 2,. 0.15µm thick of Te-doped (n-type) Ga x In 1-x As y P 1-y , x and y being selected such that the material has a band gap wavelength equivalent of 1.15µm as determined by photoluminescence. Onto the first confinement layer 2 is grown an active layer 3, 0.15µm thick, of undoped Ga x In 1-x As y P 1-y , x and y being selected such that the material has a band gap equivalent of 1.667µm. Onto the active layer 3 is grown a second confinement layer 4, 0.2µm thick, of the same material as the first confinement layer 2. The second confinement layer 4 is corrugated to provide a distributed feedback grating 9 by chemical etching through an electron-beam-exposed mask in the manner describe by Westbrook et al, Electronics letters 1982 18 pages 863 to 865. The corrugations run in the (110) direction, comprising triangular grooves with (111) A side walls. The period of the grating 9 is 475 nm and the grooves are approximately 170nm deep. On top of the grating 9 lies the ridge of the ridge waveguide structure, comprising a layer 5 approximately 1.5µm thick of Zn-doped (p-type) indium phosphide grown by atmospheric pressure, metal organic chemical vapour deposition (MOCVD) while maintaining the integrity of the gratings as previously described (European Patent Application 84 300240.3 and also Nelson et al, Electronics Letter 1983 19 pages 34 to 36). On top of the latter indium phosphide layer 5 is grown, also by MOCVD, a layer 6 approximately 0.1µm thick of heavily Zn-doped (p⁺-type) ternary material of nominal composition In 0.53 Ga 0.47 As. Lastly electrical contact layers 7, 8 of titanium and gold respectively, each about 0.1µm thick, are provided on the layer 6 of ternary material. A further contact layer 10 is provided on the underside of the substrate 1, by evaporation of tin and gold followed by alloying. The ridge is about 6µm wide and the laser as a whole is 300µm long, having one cleaved end facet and one end facet damaged to reduce reflection. To either side of the ridge lie further raised portions 11, 12 or semiconductor material, each separated from the ridge by a channel. These raised portions 11, 12 have a similar layer construction to the ridge but each has an extra layer 13 of silica below the contact layers 7, 8. In use, the DFB ridge waveguide laser described above will emit radiation having a wavelength centred on 1.55µm, and a linewidth of about 10 MHz at 10 mW output power. The band gap equivalent of the material of the active layer, as stated, is 1.667µm. In a Fabry-Perot laser without a grating, this material would show a wavelength of maximum gain at the threshold current (λ max) of 1.61µm. Therefore the DFB ridge waveguide structure emits radiation having a wavelength which is 60 nm less than the λ max of the material of the active layer. Other laser structures may give a narrower emission linewidth than the one described above. For instance if the length of the laser as a whole were increased to 800µm, the linewidth should be reduced to about 1 MHz at 10mW output power. However in each case the laser will be benefitting to the same degree from operating at an emission wavelength of 1.55µm, 60 nm below λ max at 1.61µm, in accordance with the present invention. The laser described above is designed to emit at one of the optimal wavelengths, 1.55µm, for use with silica optical fibres. A laser designed to emit at the other optimal wavelength, 1.3µm, has the following modifications: (i) the quaternary material of the active layer has a compositions selected such that its band gap equivalent wavelength is 1.452µm (equivalent to 855 meV) λ max being 1.36µm; and (ii) the grating comprises corrugations which have a period of 398 nm and are about 142 nm deep. This laser structure, at a length of 300µm, will again be operating at 60 nm below λ max at 1.36µm, and its linewidth will again be of the order of 10 MHz at an output power of 10mW. If the length of the laser is increased to 800µm, its emission linewidth will drop to about 1 MHz at an output power of 10mW. In an alternative construction to the DFB lasers described above, an external cavity or a distributed Bragg reflector may be used to reduce α, and therefore narrow the emission linewidth of a laser, according to the present invention. Both structures can be used to select the emission wavelength of a laser. by using it to select an emission wavelength shorter than λ max, an external cavity or distributed Bragg reflector can be used to achieve the object of the invention. By using a combination of structures which in themselves narrow the emission linewidth of a laser, and working at an emission wavelength less than λ max, narrower linewidths can be achieved than those quoted above. For instance, a DFB ridge waveguide laser equipped with a suitable external cavity may shown an emission linewidth of 10mW ouput power of less than 100 KHz. It should be noted that structures which can be used to select at emission wavelength for a laser can affect the emission linewidth independently of α. For instance, if an external cavity with a mirror is used, the linewidth may be significantly broadened if the round trip path for radiation in the cavity causes it to be out of phse with radiation oscillating within the laser. It is possible to estimate α at different operating wavelengths for the same structure. Referring to Figure 2, α has been determined from the Fabry-Perot resonances in the laser emission spectrum below threshold current by measuring the change in the mode gain G and the resonant wavelength λ with current I. G was determined by the method of Hakki and Paoli disclosed in "Gain Spectra in GaAs Double Heterostructure Injunction Lasers", Journal of Applied Physics 1975 46 pages 1299-1306. Writing the refractive index of the laser active region as n' + jn'' then α is defined as Since both real and imaginary parts of the refractive index are functions of the injected carrier density N, α is more usually given as where the material gain g is related to n" through n" = λ g/4 π dG/dI and dλ/dI are related to dg/dN and dn'/dN through where C is the mode confinement factor and n is the group refractive index given by n was experimentally determined in the usual way from the Fabry-Perot mode spacing Δλ s using the relation where L is the device length. Substitution of equations (3) and (4) into equation (2) yields Measurements were performed on two nominally identical 190µm long In Ga As P ridge waveguide lasers. The lasing wavelength for both was 1.53µm (0.811 eV) and the threshold current was 32mA. The laser temperature was maintained at 20°C ± 0.05°C using a thermo-electric cooler. All measurements were made using pulsed conditions (500 nsec pulses, 0.1% duty cycle) thus avoiding effects due to device heating. The measured variation in α over the wavelength range λ = 1.49 to 1.57µm (0.791 to 0.833 eV) is shown in Figure 2. The left hand vertical axis is α while the right hand axis is the linewidth broadening term (1 + α²) disclosed by Charles H Henry. The measured variation in α over the 42 meV range in photon energies is approximately α = 3 to 11 which encompasses nearly all the previously reported measurements. α can be seen to increase rapidly as the photon energy approaches the band gap energy, 0.791 eV. The curve illustrates the advantage that can be gained by operating a laser at a wavelength below λ max. At λ max, ie. at 0.811 eV, α max = 5.1. By operating the laser structure at a wavelength equivalent to 0.87 eV, α = 0.9 α max. By further decreasing the wavelength at which the laser structure operates, for instance to wavelengths equivalent to 0.824 and 0.834 eV, α can be reduced to values of 0.8 α max and 0.7 α max respectively. As mentioned above, the emission linewidth of a laser depends on many factors and the effect of a reduction in α can be heavily obscured, or even more than cancelled out, by other factors in the design or operation of a laser. For instance, operating temperature has a strong influence on linewidth, increasing temperature resulting in increased linewidth. In the description above, the figures for linewidth given relate to laser structures which are heat-stabilised in operation, by known techniques. It is optimal, if the emission radiation has a wavelength which lies in the range 1.1 to 1.65µm, to operate at a wavelength 40 to 80nm, and particularly 60 nm, shorter than λ max for a particular laser structure. This gives a significant reduction in emission linewidth without increasing the threshold current of the laser too high. The reduction in linewidth which can usefully be obtained by operating a laser structure at a wavelength below λ max is generally of the order of 50%.

Claims: A laser assembly comprising a semiconductor laser structure and means for selecting the emission wavelength, λe, of the laser structure, the selected wavelength being shorter than the wavelength of maximum gain at the threshold current, λ max, characterised in that said means does not consist of a Fabry Perot resonator formed between two end facets of the semiconductor laser structure, that λe lies in one of the ranges 1.2 to 1.35 µm and 1.48 to 1.65 µm, and in that the selected wavelength is shorter than λ max by an amount such that the linewidth enhancement factor at λ max, αmax, and the linewidth enhancement factor at the wavelength of the emitted radiation, αe, are related in the manner αe ≦ 0.9 αmax. A laser assembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein the selection means comprises a grating formed within the semiconductor structure. A laser assembly as claimed in claim 2, wherein said laser structure is a distributed feedback laser and wherein said grating provides distributed optical feedback within said laser structure. A laser assembly as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein α max and αe are related in the manner αe ≦ 0.8 α max. A laser assembly as claimed in claim 4 wherein α max and αe are related in the manner αe ≦ 0.7 αmax. A laser assembly as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the means for selecting the emission wavelength of the laser structure comprises an external cavity. A laser assembly as claimed in claim 6, wherein said means further comprises a distributed feedback grating. A coherent optical communication system comprising at least one semiconductor laser assembly as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7.

Inventors: WESTBROOK LESLIE DAVID, WESTBROOK, LESLIE DAVID
Applicants: BRITISH TELECOMM, BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
Application year: 1986
Main classification: H01S3
IPC codes: H01S5