A BLOWING NOZZLE FOR A HIGHLY PRESSURIZED GASEOUS FLUID

Abstract: A blowing nozzle for a highly pressurized gaseous fluid comprising at least two narrow exhaust passages (12) having a width insignificantly larger than the size of polluting particles occurring in said fluid. The exhaust passages are slit-formed having a length (L) no more than ten times the average width (d) of each slit. These exhaust passages extend in parallel or radially over the end surface of the nozzle, in a projection perpendicular to its longitudinal axis.

Description: A BLOWING NOZZLE FOR A HIGHLY PRESSURIZED GASEOUS FLUID. The present invention concerns a blowing nozzle for a highly pressurized gaseous fluid comprising at least two narrow exhaust passages having a width insignificantly larger than the size of particles, occurring in said fluid. Blowing nozzles are used for various industrial pur¬ poses, e.g. to blow away cuttings from a boring and other debris from a workpiece, to cool during welding or other kind of heat generating work, as exhausts from pneumatic machines or for drying of paint. A major problem with these devices is the risk of the noise level becoming hazardous, when a high blowing power is needed. Noise levels around 113dB (A) are not uncommon for blowing nozzles with high output. Noise reducing blowing nozzles are known, e.g. from SE 7806883-0, which has several small circular passages. These small passages must be drilled with a very high degree of precision, in order to achieve the desired noise reducing effect. Because of the necessity for a high degree of pre¬ cision these nozzles are comperatively expensive to manu¬ facture. At the same time the blowing force possible with one of these nozzles is limited, which means that several nozzles must be mounted in parallel in order to reach a de¬ sired large blowing force. This means that these noise- reducing blowing nozzles in many cases are a very expensive solution to the noise problem. The object of the present invention is therefore to produce a cheap and efficient nozzle with noise reducing properties, and by which it is possible to reach a conside¬ rably larger blowing force for a given frontal area, com¬ pared with corresponding known blowing nozzles. The invention is characterized in that the exhaust passages are slit-formed, each having a length, no more than ten times the average width of each slit, and that they ex¬ tend in parallel or radially over the end surface of the nozzle . , in a projection perpendicular to its longitudinal axis. According to one advantageous embodiment of the inven¬ tion, the depth of each slit-formed exhaust passage is at last five to ten times the length of said slit. Preferably several exhaust passages are formed in parallel with the longitudinal axis of the nozzle in a cen¬ tral body, which is surrounded by a casing. According to another advantageous embodiment of the in¬ vention the nozzle has a circular front with exhaust passages radially arranged concentrically around a common longitudinal axis, wherein the slit-formed exhaust passages are arranged with a minimum individual distance (distance between centres) of three times the slit width. Preferably the passages, as seen along their longitudi¬ nal axis, are diverging radially outwards to the surrounding casing. Preferably the central body protrudes from the casing in order to increase coejection of atmospheric air surrounding the nozzle. A nozzle having a rectangular front and parallel exhaust passages preferably has a distance between passages that is at least three times the square root from the product of slit length multiplied by the slit width. The invention will now be described in the following in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which Fig. 1 is an end view of a circular nozzle according to a first embodiment of the invention. Fig. 2 is a section along line II-II in Fig. 1 with left and right half of the figure showing two different examples of the invention, Fig. 3 is an end view of a second embodiment of a circular nozzle, Fig. 4 is an end view of a rectangular nozzle according to the invention, Fig. 5 is a section along line VI-VI in Fig. 7, which is a side view of another embodiment of the invention, shown in 5:1 scale, and Fig. 8 is a section along line VIII-VIII in Fig. 7. The nozzles comprise a central body 10 with longitudinal parallel slits and is surrounded by a thin wall casing 11. The slits form narrow exhaust passages 12 together with the casing 11, wherein the passages have a length L no more than ten times the width d of the slits and a depth t at least five to ten times the length of the slits. When a gas is evacuated to the atmosphere from a closed system at high speed through a passage or conduit a turbu¬ lence is created, which generates a very loud noise. Since it is easier to dampen high frequences of sound, it is acoustically advantageous to replace a large passage by se¬ veral small. The maximum generation of sound for a circular passage takes place at a frequence f maχ which is propor¬ tional to diameter d of the passage and therefore should be selected as small as possible. For a rectangular passage according to the invention, the f max has proven to be proportional to the square root from the product of slit length L multiplied by the slit width, up to very high factors L/d. It will, however, not be practical to use larger values for L/d than 10. (Note that f will only be proportional to d for values of L/d ?*- 100 and higher. But this is of no concern in the field of blowing nozzles.) Preferably the maximum frequence should be close to or even above 15 000 Hz, i.e. above normal upper limit for human hearing. For this reason the exhaust passages 12 are. as narrow as possible, without risk for clogging by debris in the exhaust air. At the same time sufficient outlet area is achieved by the number of exhaust passages, which number can be varied depending on the needs. A risk while using several adjacent exhaust passages, is that they may function acoustically like one large opening, if they are situated too close. For this reason the distance between the slit-formed exhaust passages are about three times the width d of one slit, and they do not extend further than about half the outer radius R towards the centre of the nozzle. It has also been found that the generation of noise is reduced when an air jet can convey the surrounding gas. To enable this the nozzle exhaust passages should be placed near the outskirts of the nozzle front. This conveying of surrounding gas can be enhanced when the central body 12 may protrude axially out of the casing. From Fig. 2 it appears that the slit-formed exhaust passages 12 reach far into the nozzle. Experiments have proven that the generation of noise is gradually reduced by increasing slit depth t, until the slit depth reaches a value between five to ten times the slit length L. The smaller value concerns a diverging passage, i.e. as in the right half of Fig. 2. Fig. 3 shows a variant of the nozzle according to the invention, wherein the slits have two different lengths L, and 2 respectively. This embodiment enables a larger blow¬ ing capacity for a given frontal area. This arrangement, however, results in a slightly higher sound level. Figs. 4 and 5 show a rectangular nozzle according to the invention having four exhaust passages 12 extending through a central body 10, which is surrounded by a four-sided casing 11. As well as in the above described circular nozzle, the exhaust passages are narrow and slit-formed. The distance between these are at least three times the square root from the product of slit length L multiplied by the slit width d. The exhaust passages 12 can be cut into the central body from both the long sides, so that the body is maintained in one piece, which can be pushed axially into the casing 11. Just as in the former embodiment, the slit length L is no more than ten times the slit width d and the slit depth t is at least five to ten times the slit length L. The passages can also be made converging in the direction of the gas stream towards the nozzle front. Figs. 6, 7 and 8 show a variant of the invention wherein the exhaust openings 12, as seen in their longitudinal di¬ rection, diverge radially towards the surrounding casing 11. This embodiment is especially preferable when producing very narrow blowing nozzles having a frontal diameter of about 5 mm. In this embodiment the exhaust passages can reach further in towards the centre of the nozzle since they di¬ verge as mentioned above, without getting into conflict with the condition that the smallest distance between adjacent passages must be three times the width of the slit-formed passages, which contributes to a further increased blowing force for any given nozzle frontal area. If the nozzle is pointed like in Figs. 7 and 8 its accessibility is enhanced and it can be used to clean very small drill holes. Tests made with the nozzles according to the invention to compare them with a conventional blowing nozzle having circular passages with the same total outlet area (80mm ) and the same working pressure (600 kPa) and the same blow¬ ing force (20 N at a distance of 10 cm) have established that the noise is reduced from 113 dB(A) for the conven¬ tional nozzle, to 96 dB(A) for the new nozzle. This very large reduction of noise will significantly reduce the cost when building new factories or can be utilized to improve conditions within existing factories. One reason for the surprisingly good test results for the nozzle according to the invention is its ability to con¬ vey surrounding air. Traditionally the inner form of a exhaust passage has been considered to have no importance for the generation of noise which takes place within the turbulence outside the nozzle. However, an air jet leaving a hole in a thin wall can cause a back flow along the fringes of the hole, which back flow increases the turbulence and the generation of noise. The proportionally large depth of the slit-formed passages at the nozzles according to the invention prevents this back flow and therefore contributes to the lowered noise level. The invention is not limited to the above described em¬ bodiments and several variants are possible within the scope of the accompanying claims. The central body can be moulded, cut or extruded at a comparatively low cost.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A blowing nozzle for a highly pressurized gaseous fluid comprising at least two narrow exhaust passages (12) having a width insignificantly larger than the size of par¬ ticles, occurring in said fluid, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that the exhaust passages (12) are slit-formed, each having a length (L) , no more than ten times the average width (d) of each slit, and that they extend in parallel or radially over the end surface of the nozzle, in a projection perpendicular to its longitudinal axis. 2. A blowing nozzle according to claim 1, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that the depth (t) of each slit-formed exhaust passage is at least five to ten times the length (L) of said slit. 3. A blowing nozzle according to claim 1 or 2, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that several exhaust passages (12), in parallel with the longitudinal axis of the nozzle, are formed in a central body (10), which is surrounded by a casing (11). 4. A blowing nozzle acording to any of the preceding claims and having a circular front with exhaust passages radially arranged concentrically around a common longitudi¬ nal axis, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that the slit- formed exhaust passages (12) are arranged with a minimum individual distance (distance between centres) of three times the slit width (d). 5. A blowing nozzle according to claim 4, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that the passages (12), as seen along their longitudinal axis (L), are diverging radi¬ ally outwards to the surrounding casing (11). 6. A blowing nozzle according to claim 4 or 5, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that the central body (10) protrudes from the casing (11) in order to increase convey¬ ance of atmospheric air surrounding the nozzle. 7. A blowing nozzle according to any of the claims 1-3, and having a rectangular front and parallel exhaust passages (12), c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that the distance between passages (12) is at least three times the square root from the product of slit length (L) multiplied by the slit width (d).

Inventors: INGEMANSSON STIG, INGEMANSSON, STIG
Applicants: INGEMANSSONS INGENJORSBYRA AB, INGEMANSSONS INGENJOERBYRAO AB
Application year: 1986
Main classification: B05B1
IPC codes: B05B1, B08B5