METALLOPROTEINASE INHIBITOR SEQUENCE RECOMBINANT VECTOR SYSTEM FOR USING SAME AND RECOMBINANT-DNA METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF SAME

Abstract: A portable DNA sequence which is capable of directing intracellular production of metalloproteinase inhibitors. Vectors containing this portable DNA sequence are also set forth, including the vector pUC9-F5/237P10. A recombinant-DNA method for the microbial production of a metalloproteinase inhibitor, which method incorporates at least one of the portable DNA sequences and the vectors disclosed herein.

Description: METALLOPROTEINASE INHIBITOR SEQUENCE RECOMBINANT VECTOR SYSTEM FOR USING SAME AND RECOMBINANT-DNA METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF SAME BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. Pat¬ ent Application Serial No. 784,319, filed October 4, 1985, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 699,181, filed February 5, 1985. Endogenous proteolytic enzymes serve to degrade invading organisms, antigen- antibody complexes and certain tissue proteins which are no longer necessary or useful to the organism. In a normally func¬ tioning organism, proteolytic enzymes are produced in a limited quantity and are regulated in part through specific inhibitors. Metalloproteinases are enzymes present in the body which are often involved in the degradation of connective tissue. While some connective tissue degradation is necessary for normal functioning of an organism, an excess of connective tissue degra¬ dation occurs in several disease states and is believed to be attributable, at least in part, to excess metalloproteinase. It is believed that metalloproteinases are at least implicated in periodontal disease, corneal and skin ulcers, rheumatoid arthri¬ tis and the spread of cancerous solid tumors. These diseases generally occur in areas of the body which contain a high proportion of collagen, a particular form of connective tissue. An examination of patients with these diseas¬ es of connective tissue has revealed an excessive breakdown of the various components of connective tissues, including collagen proteoglycans and elastin. Therefore, it has been deduced that an excessive concentration of a particular metalloproteinase, for example collagenase, proteoglyconase, gelatinase, and certain elastases, may cause or exacerbate the connective tissue destruc¬ tion associated with the aforementioned diseases. In the normal state, the body possesses metallopro¬ teinase inhibitors which bind to metalloproteinases to effec¬ tively prevent these enzymes from acting on their connective tis¬ sue substrates. Specifically, in a healthy organism, metalloproteinase inhibitors are present in concentrations suffi¬ cient to interact with metalloproteinases to an extent which allows sufficient quantities of metalloproteinase to remain active while binding the excess metalloproteinase so that the connective tissue damage seen in the various diseases does not occur. It is postulated that one immediate cause of the con¬ nective tissue destruction present in the foregoing disease states is an imbalance in the relative metalloproteinase/metallo- proteinase inhibitor concentrations. In these situations, either due to an excessive amount of active metalloproteinase or a defi¬ ciency in the amount of active metalloproteinase inhibitor, the excess metalloproteinase is believed to cause the connective tis¬ sue degradation responsible for causing or exacerbating the dis¬ ease. It is postulated that, by treating persons with connective tissue diseases with metalloproteinase inhibitors, the ' degradative action of the excess metalloproteinase may be cur¬ tailed or halted. Therefore, particular metalloproteinase inhib¬ itors of specific interest to the present inventors are collage- nase inhibitors because it is believed that these inhibitors would be pharmaceutically useful in the .treatment or prevention of connective tissue diseases. The existence of metalloproteinase and metallopro¬ teinase inhibitors has been discussed in the scientific litera¬ ture. For example, Sellers et al. , Biochemical And Biophysical Research Communications 87:581-587 (1979), discusses isolation of rabbit bone collagenase inhibitor. Collagenase inhibitor iso¬ lated from human skin fibroblasts is discussed in Stricklin and Welgus, J.B.C. 258:12252-12258 (1983) and Welgus and Stricklin, ^ J.B.C. 258:12259-12264 (1983). The presence of collagenase in¬ hibitors in naturally-occurring body fluids is further discussed in Murphy et al. , Biochem. J. 195:167-170 (1981) and Cawston et al. , Arthritis and Rheumatism, Z : ^^^ (1984). In addition, met¬ alloproteinase inhibitors are discussed by Reynolds et al. in Cellular Interactions, Dingle and Gordon, eds., (1981). Although these articles characterize particular, isolated metallopro¬ teinase inhibitors and discuss, to some extent, the role or potential role of metalloproteinases in connective tissue disease treatment and speculate on the ability of metalloproteinase inhibitors to counteract this destruction, none of these re¬ searchers had previously been able to isolate a portable DNA sequence capable of directing intracellular production of metal¬ loproteinase inhibitors or to create a recombinant-DNA method for the production of these inhibitors. Surprisingly, the present inventors have discovered a portable DNA sequence capable of directing the recombinant-DNA synthesis of metalloproteinase inhibitors. These metallopro¬ teinase inhibitors are biologically equivalent to those isolated from human skin fibroblast cultures. The metalloproteinase in¬ hibitors of the present invention, prepared by the recombinant- DNA methods set forth herein, will enable increased research into prevention and treatment of metalloproteinase-induced connective tissue diseases. In addition, the metalloproteinase inhibitors of the present invention are useful in neutralizing metallopro¬ teinases, including the excess metalloproteinase associated with disease states. Therefore, it is believed that a cure for these diseases will be developed which will embody, as an active ingre¬ dient, the metalloproteinase inhibitors of the present invention. Furthermore, the metalloproteinase inhibitors of the present- invention are capable of interacting with their metalloproteinase targets in a manner which allows the development of diagnostic tests for degradative connective tissue diseases using the newly discovered inhibitors. The recombinant metalloproteinase inhibitors discussed herein interact stoichiometrically (i.e., in a 1:1 ratio) with their metalloproteinase targets. In addition, these metallopro¬ teinase inhibitors are heat resistant, acid stable, glycosylated, and exhibit a high isoelectric point. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to metalloproteinase in¬ hibitors and a recombinant-DNA method of producing the same and to portable DNA sequences capable of directing intracellular pro¬ duction of the metalloproteinase inhibitors. Particularly, the present invention relates to a collagenase inhibitor, a recombi¬ nant-DNA method for producing the same and to portable DNA se¬ quences for use in the recombinant method. The present invention also relates to a series of vectors containing these portable DNA sequences . One object of the present invention is to provide a metalloproteinase inhibitor, which can be produced in sufficient quantities and purities to provide economical pharmaceutical com¬ positions which possess metalloproteinase inhibitor activity. An additional object of the present invention is to provide a recombinant-DNA method for the production of these metalloproteinase inhibitors. The recombinant metalloproteinase inhibitors produced by this method are biologically equivalent to the metalloproteinase inhibitor isolable from human skin fibroblast cultures. To facilitate the recombinant-DNA synthesis of these metalloproteinase inhibitors, it is a further object of the pres¬ ent invention to provide portable DNA sequences capable of directing intracellular production of metalloproteinase inhib¬ itors. It is also an object of the present invention to provide cloning vectors containing these portable sequences. These vectors are capable of being used in recombinant systems to pro¬ duce pharmaceutically useful quantities of metalloproteinase in¬ hibitors. Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description or may be learned from practice of the invention. The objects and advantages may be re¬ alized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combi¬ nations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. To achieve the objects and in accordance with the pur¬ poses of the present invention, metalloproteinase inhibitors are set forth, which are capable of stoichiometric reaction with metalloproteinases. These metalloproteinase inhibitors are re¬ markably heat resistant, acid stable, glyσosylated, and exhibit a high isoelectric point. Furthermore, these metalloproteinase in¬ hibitors are biologically equivalent to those inhibitors isolated from human skin fibroblast cultures. To further achieve the objects and in accordance with the purposes of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, portable DNA sequences coding for metallopro¬ teinase inhibitors are provided. These sequences comprise nucleotide sequences capable of directing intracellular produc¬ tion of metalloproteinase inhibitors. The portable sequences may be either synthetic sequences or restriction fragments ( "natural" DNA sequences) . In a preferred embodiment, a portable DNA se¬ quence is isolated from a human fibroblast cDNA library and is capable of directing intracellular production of a collagenase inhibitor which is biologically equivalent to that inhibitor which is isolable from a human skin fibroblast culture. The coding strand of a first preferred DNA sequence which has been discovered has the following nucleotide sequence: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GTTGTTGCTG TGGCTGATAG CCCCAGCAGG GCCTGCACCT GTGTCCCACC CCACCCACAG 70 80 90 100 110 120 ACGGCCTTCT GCAATTCCGA CCTCGTCATC AGGGCCAAGT TCGTGGGGAC ACCAGAAGTC 130 140 150 160 170 180 AACCAGACCA CCTTATACCA GCGTTATGAG ATCAAGATGA CCAAGATGTA TAAAGGGTTC 190 200 210 220 230 240 CAAGCCTTAG GGGATGCCGC TGACATCCGG TTCGTCTACA CCCCCGCCAT GGAGAGTGTC 250 260 270 280 290 300 TGCGGATACT TCCACAGGTC CCACAACCGC AGCGAGGAGT TTCTCATTGC TGGAAAACTG 310 320 330 340 350 360 CAGGATGGAC TCTTGCACAT CACTACCTGC AGTTTCGTGG CTCCCTGGAA CAGCCTGAGC 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTAGCTCAGC GCCGGGGCTT CACCAAGACC TACACTGTTG GCTGTGAGGA ATGCACAGTG 430 440 450 460 470 480 TTTCCCTGTT TATCCATCCC CTGCAAACTG CAGAGTGGCA CTCATTGCTT GTGGACGGAC 490 500 510 520 530 540 CAGCTCCTCC AAGGCTCTGA AAAGGGCTTC CAGTCCCGTC ACCTTGCCTG CCTGCCTCGG 550 560 570 580 590 600 GAGCCAGGGC TGTGCACCTG GCAGTCCCTG CGGTCCCAGA TAGCCTGAAT CCTGCCCGGA 610 620 630 640 650 660 GTGGAAGCTG AAGCCTGCAC AGTGTCCACC CTGTTCCCAC TCCCATCTTT CTTCCGGACA 670 680 690 700 ATGAAATAAA GAGTTACCAC CCAGCAAAAA AAAAAAGGAA TTC The nucleotides represented by the foregoing abbreviations are set forth in the Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodi¬ ments. A second preferrred DNA sequence has been discovered which has an additional nucleotide sequence 5 ' to the initiator sequence. This sequence, which contains as the eighty-second through four-hundred-thirty-second nucleotides nucleotoides 1 through 351 of the first preferred sequence set forth above, has the following nucleotide sequence: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GGCCATCGCC GCAGATCCAG CGCCCAGAGA GACACCAGAG AACCCACCAT GGCCCCCTTT 70 80 90 100 110 120 GACCCCTGGC TTCTGCATCC TGTTGTTGCT GTGGCTGATA GCCCCAGCAG GGCCTGCACC 130 140 150 160 170 180 TGTGTCCCAC CCCACCCACA GACGGCCTTC TGCAATTCCG ACCTCGTCAT CAGGGCCAAG 190 200 210 220 230 240 TTCGTGGGGA CACCAGAAGT CAACCAGACC ACCTTATACC AGCGTTATGA GATCAAGATG 250 260 270 280 290 300 ACCAAGATGT ATAAAGGGTT CCAAGCCTTA GGGGATGCCG CTGACATCCG GTTCGTCTAC 310 320 330 340 350 360 ACCCCCGCCA TGGAGAGTGT CTGCGGATAC TTCCACAGGT CCCACAACCG CAGCGAGGAG 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTTCTCATTG CTGGAAAACT GCAGGATGGA CTCTTGCACA TCACTACCTG CAGTTTCGTG 430 GCTCCCTGGA AC A third preferred DNA sequence which incorporates the 5 ' region of the second preferred sequence and the 3 ' sequence of the first preferred sequence, has the following nucleotide se¬ quence: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GGCCATCGCC GCAGATCCAG CGCCCAGAGA GACACCAGAG AACCCACCAT GGCCCCCTTT 70 80 90 100 110 120 GACCCCTGGC TTCTGCATCC TGTTGTTGCT GTGGCTGATA GCCCCAGCAG GGCCTGCACC 130 140 150 160 170 180 TGTGTCCCAC CCCACCCACA GACGGCCTTC TGCAATTCCG ACCTCGTCAT CAGGGCCAAG 190 200 210 220 230 240 TTCGTGGGGA CACCAGAAGT CAACCAGACC ACCTTATACC AGCGTTATGA GATCAAGATG 250 260 270 280 290 300 ACCAAGATGT ATAAAGGGTT CCAAGCCTTA GGGGATGCCG CTGACATCCG GTTCGTCTAC 310 320 330 340 350 360 ACCCCCGCCA TGGAGAGTGT CTGCGGATAC TTCCACAGGT CCCACAACCG CAGCGAGGAG 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTTCTCATTG CTGGAAAACT GCAGGATGGA CTCTTGCACA TCACTACCTG CAGTTTCGTG 430 440 450 460 470 480 GCTCCCTGGA ACAGCCTGAG CTTAGCTCAG CGCCGGGGCT TCACCAAGAC CTACACTGTT 490 500 510 520 530 540 GGCTGTGAGG AATGCACAGT GTTTCCCTGT TTATCCATCC CCTGCAAACT GCAGAGTGGC 550 560 570 580 590 600 ACTCATTGCT TGTGGACGGA CCAGCTCCTC CAAGGCTCTG AAAAGGGCTT CCAGTCCCGT 610 620 630 640 650 660 CACCTTGCCT GCCTGCCTCG GGAGCCAGGG CTGTGCACCT GGCAGTCCCT GCGGTCCCAG 670 680 690 700 710 720 ATAGCCTGAA TCCTGCCCGG AGTGGAAGCT GAAGCCTGCA CAGTGTCCAC CCTGTTCCCA 730 740 750 760 770 780 CTCCCATCTT TCTTCCGGAC AATGAAATAA AGAGTTACCA CCCAGCAAAA AAAAAAAGGA Currently, for expression of the instant met¬ alloproteinase inhibitors in animal cells, the inventors most prefer a method which utilizes a fourth preferred DNA sequence. The coding strand of this sequence reads as follows: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GGCCATCGCC GCAGATCCAG CGCCCAGAGA GACACCAGAG AACCCACCAT GGCCCCCTTT 70 80 90 100 110 120 GAGCCCCTGG CTTCTGGCAT CCTGTTGTTG CTGTGGCTGA TAGCCCCCAG CAGGGCCTGC 130 140 150 160 170 180 ACCTGTGTCC CACCCCACCC ACAGACGGCC TTCTGCAATT CCGACCTCGT CATCAGGGCC 190 200 210 220 230 240 AAGTTCGTGG GGACACCAGA AGTCAACCAG ACCACCTTAT ACCAGCGTTA TGAGATCAAG 250 260 270 280 , 290 300 ATGACCAAGA TGTATAAAGG GTTCCAAGCC TTAGGGGATG CCGCTGACAT CCGGTTCGTC 310 320 330 340 350 360 TACACCCCCG CCATGGAGAG TGTCTGCGGA TACTTCCACA GGTCCCACAA CCGCAGCGAG 370 380 390 400 410 420 GAGTTTCTCA TTGCTGGAAA ACTGCAGGAT GGACTCTTGC ACATCACTAC CTGCAGTTTC 430 440 450 460 470 480 GTGGCTCCCT GGAACAGCCT GAGCTTAGCT CAGCGCCGGG GCTTCACCAA GACCTACACT 490 500 510 520 530 540 GTTGGCTGTG AGGAATGCAC AGTGTTTCCC TGTTTATCCA TCCCCTGCAA ACTGCAGAGT 550 560 570 580 590 600 GGCACTCATT GCTTGTGGAC GGACCAGCTC CTCCAAGGCT CTGAAAAGGG CTTCCAGTCC 610 620 630 640 650 660 CGTCACCTTG CCTGCCTGCC TCGGGAGCCA GGGCTGTGCA CCTGGCAGTC CCTGCGGTCC 670 680 690 700 710 720 CAGATAGCCT GAATCCTGCC CGGAGTGGAA GCTGAAGCCT GCACAGTGTC CACCCTGTTC 730 740 750 760 770 780 CCACTCCCAT CTTTCTTCCG GACAATGAAA TAAAGAGTTA CCACCCAGCA AAAAAAAAAA GGAATTC To facilitate identification and isolation of natural DNA sequences for use in the present invention, the inventors have developed a human skin fibroblast cDNA library. This li¬ brary contains the genetic information capable of directing a ' cell to synthesi'ze the metalloproteinase inhibitors of the pres¬ ent invention. Other natural DNA sequences which may be used in the recombinant DNA methods set forth herein may be isolated from human genomic libraries . Additionally, portable DNA sequences useful in the pro¬ cesses of the present invention may be synthetically created. These synthetic DNA sequences may be prepared by polynucleotide synthesis and sequencing techniques known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Additionally, to achieve the objects and in accordance with the purposes of the present invention, a recombinant-DNA method is disclosed which results in microbial manufacture of the instant metalloproteinase inhibitors using the portable DNA se¬ quences referred to above. This recombinant DNA method com¬ prises: (a) preparation of a portable DNA sequence capable of directing a host microorga¬ nism to produce a protein having metalloproteinase inhibitor activity, preferably collagenase inhibitor activity; (b) cloning the portable DNA sequence into a vector capable of being transferred into and replicating in a host microorganism, such vector containing operational ele¬ ments for the portable DNA sequence; (c) transferring the vector containing the portable DNA sequence and operational elements into a host microorganism capa¬ ble of expressing the metalloproteinase inhibitor protein; (d) culturing the host microorganism under conditions appropriate for amplification of the vector and expression of the in¬ hibitor; and (e) in either order: (i) harvesting the inhibitor; and (ii) causing the inhibitor to assume an active, tertiary structure whereby it possesses metalloproteinase in¬ hibitor activity. To further accomplish the objects and in further accord with the purposes of the present invention, a series of cloning vectors are provided comprising at least one of the portable DNA sequences discussed above. In particular, plasmid pUC9-F5/237P10 is disclosed. It is understood that both the foregoing general de¬ scription and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed. The accompanying drawing, which is incorporated in and constitutes a part of this specification, illustrates one embodi¬ ment of the invention and, together with the description, serves to explain the principles of the invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a partial restriction map of the plasmid DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Reference will now be made in detail to the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, which, together with the drawing and the following examples, serve to explain the princi¬ ples of the invention. As noted above, the present invention relates in part to portable DNA sequences capable of directing intracellular pro¬ duction of metalloproteinase inhibitors in a variety of host microorganisms. "Portable DNA sequence" in this context is in¬ tended to refer either to a synthetically-produced nucleotide se¬ quence or to a restriction fragment of a naturally occuring DNA sequence. For purposes of this specification, "metalloproteinase inhibitor" is intended to mean the primary structure of the pro¬ tein as defined by the codons present in the deoxyribonucleic acid sequence which directs intracellular production of the amino acid sequence, and which may or may not include post-transla- tional modifications. It is contemplated that such post-rtransla- tional modifications include, for example, glycosylation. It is further intended that the term "metalloproteinase inhibitor" refers to either the form of the protein as would be excreted from a microorganism or the methionyl-metalloproteinase inhibitor as it may be present in microorganisms from which it was not ex¬ creted. In a preferred embodiment, the portable DNA sequences are capable of directing intracellular production of collagenase inhibitors. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the portable DNA sequences are capable of directing intracellular production of a collagenase inhibitor biologically equivalent to that previ¬ ously isolated from human skin fibroblast cultures. By "biologi¬ cally equivalent," as used herein in the specification and claims, it is meant that an inhibitor, produced using a portable DNA sequence of the present invention, is capable of preventing collagenase-induced tissue damage of the same type, but not nec¬ essarily to the same degree, as a native human collagenase inhib¬ itor, specifically that native human collagenase inhibitor isolable from human skin fibroblast cell cultures. A first preferred portable DNA sequence of the present invention has a nucleotide sequence as follows: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GTTGTTGCTG TGGCTGATAG CCCCAGCAGG GCCTGCACCT GTGTCCCACC CCACCCACAG 70 80 90 100 110 120 ACGGCCTTCT GCAATTCCGA CCTCGTCATC AGGGCCAAGT TCGTGGGGAC ACCAGAAGTC 130 140 150 160 170 180 AACCAGACCA CCTTATACCA GCGTTATGAG ATCAAGATGA CCAAGATGTA TAAAGGGTTC 190 200 210 220 230 240 CAAGCCTTAG GGGATGCCGC TGACATCCGG TTCGTCTACA CCCCCGCCAT GGAGAGTGTC 250 260 270 280 290 300 TGCGGATACT TCCACAGGTC CCACAACCGC AGCGAGGAGT TTCTCATTGC TGGAAAACTG 310 320 330 340 350 360 CAGGATGGAC TCTTGCACAT CACTACCTGC AGTTTCGTGG CTCCCTGGAA CAGCCTGAGC 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTAGCTCAGC GCCGGGGCTT CACCAAGACC TACACTGTTG GCTGTGAGGA ATGCACAGTG 430 440 450 460 470 480 TTTCCCTGTT TATCCATCCC CTGCAAACTG CAGAGTGGCA CTCATTGCTT GTGGACGGAC 490 500 510 520 530 540 CAGCTCCTCC AAGGCTCTGA AAAGGGCTTC CAGTCCCGTC ACCTTGCCTG CCTGCCTCGG 550 560 570 580 590 600 GAGCCAGGGC TGTGCACCTG GCAGTCCCTG CGGTCCCAGA TAGCCTGAAT CCTGCCCGGA 610 620 630 640 650 660 GTGGAAGCTG AAGCCTGCAC AGTGTCCACC CTGTTCCCAC TCCCATCTTT CTTCCGGACA 670 680 690 700 ATGAAATAAA GAGTTACCAC CCAGCAAAAA AAAAAAGGAA TTC wherein the following nucleotides are represented by the abbrevi¬ ations indicated below. Nucleotides Abbreviation Deoxyadenylic acid A Deoxyguanylic acid G Deoxycytidylic acid C Thymidylic acid T A second preferred portable DNA sequence of the present invention has the following nucleotide sequence: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GGCCATCGCC GCAGATCCAG CGCCCAGAGA GACACCAGAG AACCCACCAT GGCCCCCTTT 70 80 90 100 110 120 GACCCCTGGC TTCTGCATCC TGTTGTTGCT GTGGCTGATA GCCCCAGCAG GGCCTGCACC 130 140 150 160 170 180 TGTGTCCCAC CCCACCCACA GACGGCCTTC TGCAATTCCG ACCTCGTCAT CAGGGCCAAG 190 200 210 220 230 240 TTCGTGGGGA CACCAGAAGT CAACCAGACC ACCTTATACC AGCGTTATGA GATCAAGATG 250 260 270 280 290 300 ACCAAGATGT ATAAAGGGTT CCAAGCCTTA GGGGATGCCG CTGACATCCG GTTCGTCTAC 310 320 330 340 350 360 ACCCCCGCCA TGGAGAGTGT CTGCGGATAC TTCCACAGGT CCCACAACCG CAGCGAGGAG 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTTCTCATTG CTGGAAAACT GCAGGATGGA CTCTTGCACA TCACTACCTG CAGTTTCGTG 430 GCTCCCTGGA AC In this second preferred sequence, an open reading frame exists from nucleotides 1 through 432. The first methionine of this reading frame is encoded by nucleotides by 49 through 51 and is the site of translation initiation. It should be noted that the amino acid sequence prescribed by nucleotides 49 through 114 is not found in the mature metalloproteinase. It is believed that this sequence is the leader peptide of the human protein. A third preferred portable DNA sequence has the nucleotide sequence: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GGCCATCGCC GCAGATCCAG CGCCCAGAGA GACACCAGAG AACCCACCAT GGCCCCCTTT 70 80 90 100 110 120 GACCCCTGGC TTCTGCATCC TGTTGTTGCT GTGGCTGATA GCCCCAGCAG GGCCTGCACC 130 140 150 160 170 180 TGTGTCCCAC CCCACCCACA GACGGCCTTC TGCAATTCCG ACCTCGTCAT CAGGGCCAAG 190 200 210 220 230 240 TTCGTGGGGA CACCAGAAGT CAACCAGACC ACCTTATACC AGCGTTATGA GATCAAGATG 250 260 270 280 290 300 ACCAAGATGT ATAAAGGGTT CCAAGCCTTA GGGGATGCCG CTGACATCCG GTTCGTCTAC 310 320 330 340 350 360 ACCCCCGCCA TGGAGAGTGT CTGCGGATAC TTCCACAGGT CCCACAACCG CAGCGAGGAG 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTTCTCATTG CTGGAAAACT GCAGGATGGA CTCTTGCACA TCACTACCTG CAGTTTCGTG 430 440 450 460 470 480 GCTCCCTGGA ACAGCCTGAG CTTAGCTCAG CGCCGGGGCT TCACCAAGAC CTACACTGTT 490 500 510 520 530 540 GGCTGTGAGG AATGCACAGT GTTTCCCTGT TTATCCATCC CCTGCAAACT GCAGAGTGGC 550 560 570 580 590 600 ACTCATTGCT TGTGGACGGA CCAGCTCCTC CAAGGCTCTG AAAAGGGCTT CCAGTCCCGT 610 620 630 640 650 660 CACCTTGCCT GCCTGCCTCG GGAGCCAGGG CTGTGCACCT GGCAGTCCCT GCGGTCCCAG 670 680 690 700 710 720 ATAGCCTGAA TCCTGCCCGG AGTGGAAGCT GAAGCCTGCA CAGTGTCCAC CCTGTTCCCA 730 740 750 760 770 780 CTCCCATCTT TCTTCCGGAC AATGAAATAA AGAGTTACCA CCCAGCAAAA AAAAAAAGGA This third sequence contains the 5 ' nontranslated region of the second preferred sequence and the 3 ' region of the first pre¬ ferred sequence. It is envisioned that this third preferred se¬ quence is capable of directing intracellular production of a met¬ alloproteinase analogous to a mature human collagenase inhibitor in a microbial or mammalian expression system. Currently, for expression of the instant met¬ alloproteinase inhibitors in animal cells, the inventors most prefer a method which utilizes a fourth preferred DNA sequence. The coding strand of this sequence reads as follows: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GGCCATCGCC GCAGATCCAG CGCCCAGAGA GACACCAGAG AACCCACCAT GGCCCCCTTT 70 80 90 100 110 120 GAGCCCCTGG CTTCTGGCAT CCTGTTGTTG CTGTGGCTGA TAGCCCCCAG CAGGGCCTGC 130 140 150 160 170 180 ACCTGTGTCC CACCCCACCC ACAGACGGCC TTCTGCAATT CCGACCTCGT CATCAGGGCC 190 200 210 220 230 240 AAGTTCGTGG GGACACCAGA AGTCAACCAG ACCACCTTAT ACCAGCGTTA TGAGATCAAG 250 260 270 280 290 300 ATGACCAAGA TGTATAAAGG GTTCCAAGCC TTAGGGGATG CCGCTGACAT CCGGTTCGTC 310 320 330 340 350 360 TACACCCCCG CCATGGAGAG TGTCTGCGGA TACTTCCACA GGTCCCACAA CCGCAGCGAG. 370 380 390 400 410 420 GAGTTTCTCA TTGCTGGAAA ACTGCAGGAT GGACTCTTGC ACATCACTAC CTGCAGTTTC 430 440 " 450 460 470 480 GTGGCTCCCT GGAACAGCCT GAGCTTAGCT CAGCGCCGGG GCTTCACCAA GACCTACACT 490 500 510 520 530 540 GTTGGCTGTG AGGAATGCAC AGTGTTTCCC TGTTTATCCA TCCCCTGCAA ACTGCAGAGT 550 560 570 580 590 600 GGCACTCATT GCTTGTGGAC GGACCAGCTC CTCCAAGGCT CTGAAAAGGG CTTCCAGTCC 610 620 630 640 650 660 CGTCACCTTG CCTGCCTGCC TCGGGAGCCA GGGCTGTGCA CCTGGCAGTC CCTGCGGTCC 670 680 690 700 710 720 CAGATAGCCT GAATCCTGCC CGGAGTGGAA GCTGAAGCCT GCACAGTGTC CACCCTGTTC 730 740 750 760 770 780 CCACTCCCAT CTTTCTTCCG GACAATGAAA TAAAGAGTTA CCACCCAGCA AAAAAAAAAA It must be borne in mind in the practice of the present invention that the alteration of some amino acids in a protein sequence may not affect the fundamental properties of the pro¬ tein. Therefore, it is also contemplated that other ' portable DNA sequences, both those capable of directing intracellular produc¬ tion of identical amino acid sequences and those capable of directing intracellular production of analogous amino acid se¬ quences which also possess metalloproteinase inhibitor activity, are included within the ambit of the present invention. It is contemplated that some of these analogous amino acid sequences will be substantially homologous to native human metalloproteinase inhibitors while other amino acid sequences, capable of functioning as metalloproteinase inhibitors, will not exhibit substantial homology to native inhibitors. By "substan¬ tial homology, " as used herein, is meant a degree of homology to a native metalloproteinase inhibitor in excess of 50%, preferably in excess of 60%, preferably in excess of 80%. The percentage homology as discussed herein is calculated as the percentage of amino acid residues found in the smaller of the two sequences that align with identical amino acid residues in the sequence being compared when four gaps in a length of 100 amino acids may be introduced to assist in that alignment as set forth by Dayhoff, M.O. in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure Vol. 5, p. 124 (1972), National Biochemical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C., specifically incorporated herein by reference. As noted above, the portable DNA sequences of the pres¬ ent invention may be synthetically created. It is believed that the means for synthetic creation of these polynucleotide se¬ quences are generally known to one of ordinary skill in the art, particularly in light of the teachings contained herein. As an example of the current state of the art relating to poly¬ nucleotide synthesis, one is directed to Matteucci, M.D. and Caruthers, M.H., in J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103 : 3185 (1981) and Beaucage, S.L. and Caruthers, M.H. in Tetrahedron Lett. ι 1859 (1981), specifically incorporated herein by reference. Additionally, the portable DNA sequence may be a frag¬ ment of a natural sequence, i.e., a fragment of a polynucleotide which occurred in nature and which has been isolated and purified for the first time by the present inventors. In one embodiment, the portable DNA sequence is a restriction fragment isolated from a cDNA library. In this preferred embodiment, the cDNA library is created from human skin fibiroblasts. In an alternative embodiment, the portable DNA sequence is isolated from a human genomic library. An example of such a library useful in this embodiment is set forth in Lawn et al. Cell 15: 1157-1174 (1978), specifically incorporated herein by reference. As also noted above, the present invention relates to a series of vectors, each containing at least one of the portable DNA sequences described herein. It is contemplated that addi¬ tional copies of the portable DNA sequence may be included in a single vector to increase a host microorganism's ability to pro¬ duce large quantities of the desired metalloproteinase inhibitor. In addition, the cloning vectors within the scope of the present invention may contain supplemental nucleotide se¬ quences preceding or subsequent to the portable DNA sequence. These supplemental sequences are -those that will not interfere with transcription of the portable DNA sequence and will, in some instances as set forth more fully hereinbelow, enhance transcrip¬ tion, translation, or the ability of the primary amino acid structure of the resultant metalloproteinase inhibitor to assume an active, tertiary form. A preferred vector of the present invention is set forth in Figure 1. This vector, pUC9-F5/237P10, contains the preferred nucleotide sequence set forth above. Vector pUC9-F5/237P10 is present in the C600/pUC9-F5/237P10 cells on de¬ posit in the American Type Culture Collection in Rockville, Maryland under Accession No. 53003. A preferred nucleotide sequence encoding the metallo¬ proteinase inhibitor is identified in Figure 1 as region A. Plasmid pUC9-F5/237P10 also contains supplemental nucleotide se¬ quences preceding and subsequent to the preferred portable DNA sequence in region A. These supplemental sequences are identi¬ fied as regions B and C, respectively. In alternate preferred embodiments, either one or both of the preceding or subsequent supplemental sequences may be re¬ moved from the vector of Fig. 1 by treatment of the vector with restriction endonucleases appropriate for removal of the supple¬ mental sequences. The supplemental sequence subsequent to the portable DNA sequence, identified in Fig. 1 as region C, may be removed by treatment of the vector with a suitable restriction endonuclease, preferably HgiAI followed by reconstruction of the 3 ' end of region A using synthetic oligonucleotides and ligation of the vector with T-4 DNA ligase. Deletion of the supplemental sequence preceding the portable DNA sequence, identified as re¬ gion B in Fig. 1, would be specifically accomplished by the meth¬ od set forth in Example 2. In preferred embodiments, cloning vectors containing and capable of expressing the portable DNA sequence of the pres¬ ent invention contain various operational elements. These "oper¬ ational elements," as discussed herein, include at least one pro¬ moter, at least one Shine-Dalgarno sequence, at least one terminator codon. Preferably, these "operational elements" also include at least one operator, at least one leader sequence, and for proteins to be exported from intracellular space, at least one regulator and any other DNA sequences necessary or preferred for appropriate transcription and subsequent translation of the vector DNA. Additional embodiments of the present invention are en¬ visioned as employing other known or currently undiscovered vectors which would contain one or more of the portable DNA se¬ quences described herein. In particular, it is preferred that these vectors have some or all of the following characteristics: (1) possess a minimal number of host-organism sequences; (2) be stable in the desired host; (3) be capable of being present in a high copy number in the desired host; (4) possess a regulatable promoter; (5) have at least one DNA sequence coding for a se¬ lectable trait present * on a portion of the plasmid separate from that where the portable DNA sequence will be inserted; and (6) be integrated into the vector. The following, noninclusive, list of cloning vectors is believed to set forth vectors which can easily be altered to meet the above-criteria and are therefore preferred for use in the present invention. Such alterations are easily performed by those of ordinary skill in the art in light of the available lit¬ erature and the teachings herein. TABLE I HOST Vectors Comments coli pUC8 Many selectable replicons pUC9 have been characterized. pBR322 Maniatis, T. et al . (1982), pGW7 Molecular Cloning: A placl q Laboratory Manual, Cold pDP8 Spring Harbor Laboratory. BACILLUS pUBHO Genetics and Biotechnology B. subtilis pSA0501 of Bacilli, Ganesan and B. amyloliquefaciens pSA2100 Hoch, eds., 1984, Academic B. stearothermophilus pBD6 Press . pBD8 pT127 PSEUDOMONAS RSF1010 Some vectors useful in P. aeruginosa Rmsl49 broad host range of gram- P . putida pKT209 negative bacteria including RK2 Xanthomonas and Agrobacteriu . pSa727 CLOSTRIDIUM pJU12 Shuttle plasmids for E. C. perfringens pJU7 coli and C. perfringens pJUlO construction ref. Squires, pJU16 C. et al. (1984) Journal pJU13 Bacteriol. 159:465-471. SACCHAROMYCES YEp24 Botstein and Davis in S. cerevisiae Yip5 Molecular Biology of the YRpl7 Yeast Saccharomyces, Strathern, Jones, and Broach, eds. , 1982, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. It is to be understood that additional cloning vectors may now exist or will be discovered which have the above-identified prop¬ erties and are therefore suitable for use in the present inven¬ tion. These vectors are also contemplated as being within the scope of the disclosed series of cloning vectors into which the portable DNA sequences may be introduced, along with any neces¬ sary operational elements, and which altered vector is then in¬ cluded within the scope of the present invention and would be capable of being used in the recombinant-DNA method set forth more fully below. In addition to the above list, an E. coli vector sys¬ tem, as set forth in Example 2, is preferred in one embodiment as a cloning vector. Moreover, several vector plasmids which auton¬ omously replicate in a broad range of Gram Negative bacteria are preferred for use as cloning vehicles in hosts of the genera Pseudomonas . These are described by Tait, R.C., Close, T.J., Lundquist, R.C., Hagiya, M. , Rodriguez, R.L., and Kado, C.I. in Biotechnology, May, 1983, pp. 269-275; Panopoulos, N.J. in Genetic Engineering in the Plant Sciences, Praeger Publishers, New York, New York, pp. 163-185, (1981); and Sakaguchi, K. in Current Topic in Microbiology and Immunology 96_:31-45, (1982), each of which is specifically incorporated herein by reference. One particularly preferred construction employs the plasmid RSF1010 and derivatives thereof as described by Bagdasarian, M. , Bagdasarian, M.M. , Coleman, S., and Timmis, K.N. in Plasmids of Medical Environmental and Commercial Importance, Timmis, K.N. and Puhler, A. eds., Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, (1979), specifically incorporated herein by reference. The advantages of RSF1010 are that it is relatively small, high copy number plasmid which is readily transformed into and stably maintained in both E. coli and Pseudomonas species. In this system, it is preferred to use the Tac expression system as described for Escherichia, since it appears that the E. coli trp promoter is readily recognized by Pseudomonas RNA polymerase as set forth by Sakaguchi, K. in Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 95:31-45 (1982) and Gray, G.L., McKeown, K.A. , Jones, A.J.S., Seeburg, P.H., and Heyneker, H.L. in Biotechnology Feb. 1984, pp. 161-165, both of which are specifically incorpo¬ rated herein by reference. Transcriptional activity may be fur¬ ther maximized by requiring the exchange of the promoter with, e.g., an E. coli or P. aeruginosa trp promoter. In a preferred embodiment, P. aeruginosa is transformed with vectors directing the synthesis of the metalloproteinase in¬ hibitor as either an intracellular product or as a product cou¬ pled to leader sequences that will effect its processing and ex¬ port from the cell. In this embodiment, these leader sequences are preferably selected from the group consisting of beta- lactamase, OmpA protein, the naturally occurring human signal peptide, and that of carboxypeptidase G2 from Pseudomonas . Translation may be coupled to translation initiation for any of the E. coli proteins as described in Example 2, as well as to initiation sites for any of the highly expressed proteins of the host to cause intracellular expression of the metalloproteinase inhibitor. In those cases where restriction minus strains of a host Pseudomonas species are not available, transformation effi¬ ciency with plasmid constructs isolated from E. coli are poor. Therefore, passage of the Pseudomonas cloning vector through an r- m+ strain of another species prior to transformation of the desired host, as set forth in Bagdasarian, M., et al . , Plasmids of Medical, Environmental and Commercial Importance, pp. 411-422, Timmis and Puhler eds., Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press (1979), specifically incorporated herein by reference, is de¬ sired. Furthermore, a preferred expression system in hosts of the genera Bacillus involves using plasmid pUBllO as the cloning vehicle. As in other host vector systems, it is possible in Bacillus to express the metalloproteinase inhibitors of the pres¬ ent invention as either an intracellular or a secreted protein. The present embodiments include both systems. Shuttle vectors that replicate in both Bacillus and E. coli are available for constructing and testing various genes as described by Dubnau, D., Gryczan, T., Contente, S., and Shivakumar, A.G. in Genetic Engineering, Vol. 2, Setlow and Hollander eds., Plenum Press, New York, New York, pp. 115-131, (1980), specifically incorporated herein by reference. For the expression and secretion of metal¬ loproteinase inhibitors from B. subtilis, the signal sequence of alpha-amylase is preferably coupled to the coding region for the metalloproteinase inhibitor. For synthesis of intracellular met¬ alloproteinase inhibitor, the portable DNA sequence will be translationally coupled to the ribosome binding site of the alpha-amylase leader sequence. Transcription of either of these constructs is prefer¬ ably directed by the alpha-amylase promoter or a derivative thereof. This derivative contains the RNA polymerase recognition sequence of the native alpha-amylase promoter but incorporates the lac operator region as well. Similar hybrid promoters con¬ structed from the penicillinase gene promoter and the lac opera¬ tor have been shown to function in Bacillus hosts in a regu- latable fashion as set forth by Yansura, D.G. and Henner in Genetics and Biotechnology of Bacilli, Ganesan, A.T. and Hoch, J.A., eds., Academic Press, pp. 249-263, (1984), specifically in¬ corporated by reference. The lacl gene of lad" would also be included to effect regulation. One preferred construction for expression in Clostridium is in plasmid pJU12 described by Squires, C. H. et al in J. Bacteriol. 159:465-471 (1984), specifically incorporated herein by reference, transformed into C. perfringens by the meth¬ od of Heefner, D. L. et al. as described in J. Bacteriol. 159:460-464 (1984), specifically incorporated herein by refer¬ ence. Transcription is directed by the promoter of the tetracycline resistance gene. Translation is coupled to the Shine-Dalgarno sequences of this same tet r gene in a manner strictly analogous to the procedures outlined above for vectors suitable for use in other hosts. Maintenance of foreign DNA introduced into yeast can be effected in several ways (Botstein, D., and Davis, R. W. , in The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Strathern, Jones and Broach, eds., pp. 607-636 (1982). One preferred expression system for use with host organ¬ isms of the genus Saccharomyces harbors the anticollagenase gene on the 2 micron plasmid. The advantages of the 2 micron circle include relatively high copy number and stability when introduced into cir° strains. These vectors preferably incorporate the rep¬ lication origin and at least one antibiotic resistance marker from pBR322 to allow replication and selection in E. coli. In addition, the plasmid will preferably have 2 micron sequences and the yeast LEU2 gene to serve the same purposes in LEU2 mutants of yeast. The regulatable promoter from the yeast GAL1 gene will preferably be adapted to direct transcription of the portable DNA sequence gene. Translation of the portable DNA sequence in yeast will be coupled to the leader sequence that directs the secretion of yeast alpha-factor. This will cause formation of a fusion protein which will be processed in yeast and result in secretion of a metalloproteinase inhibitor. Alternatively, a methionyl- metalloproteinase inhibitor will be translated for inclusion within the cell . It is anticipated that translation of mRNA coding for the metalloproteinase inhibitor in yeast will be more efficient with the preferred codon usage of yeast than with the sequence present in pUC8-Fic, as identified in Example 2, which has been tailored to the prokaryotic bias. For this reason, the portion of the 5' end of the portable DNA sequence beginning at the Tthllll site is preferably resynthesized. The new sequence fa¬ vors the codons most frequently used in yeast. This new sequence preferably has the following nucleotide sequence: HgiAI 5 ' GAT CCG TGC ACT TGT GTT CCA CCA CAC GC ACG TGA ACA CAA GGT GGT GTG CCA CAA ACT GCT TTC TGT AAC TCT GAC C GGT GTT TGA CGA AAG ACA TTG AGA CTG GA 3 ' As will be seen from an examination of the individual cloning vectors and systems contained on the above list and de¬ scription,- various operational elements may be present in each ' of the preferred vectors of the present invention. It is contem¬ plated any additional operational elements which may be required may be added to these vectors using methods known to those of or¬ dinary skill in the art, particularly in light of the teachings herein. In practice, it is possible to construct each of these vectors in a way that allows them to be easily isolated, assem¬ bled, and interchanged. This facilitates assembly of numerous functional genes from combinations of these elements and the coding region of the metalloproteinase inhibitor. Further, many of these elements will be applicable in more than one host. At least one origin of replication recognized by the contemplated host microorganism, along with at least one select¬ able marker and at least one promoter sequence capable of initiating transcription of the portable DNA sequence are contem¬ plated as being included in these vectors. It is additionally contemplated that the vectors, in certain preferred embodiments, will contain DNA sequences capable of functioning as regulators ("operators"), and other DNA sequences capable of coding for regulator proteins. In preferred vectors of this series, the vectors additionally contain ribosome binding sites, transcrip¬ tion terminators and leader sequences. These regulators, in one embodiment, will serve to pre¬ vent expression of the portable DNA sequence in the presence of certain environmental conditions and, in the presence of other environmental conditions, allow transcription and subsequent ex¬ pression of the protein coded for by the portable DNA sequence. In particular, it is preferred that regulatory segments be in¬ serted into the vector such that expression of the portable DNA sequence will not occur in the absence of, for example, isopro- pylthio- β -d-galactoside. In this situation, the transformed mi¬ croorganisms containing the portable DNA may be grown to a de¬ sired density prior to initiation of the expression of the metalloproteinase inhibitor. In this embodiment, expression of the desired protease inhibitor is induced by addition of a sub¬ stance to the microbial environment capable of causing expression of the DNA sequence. after the desired density has been achieved. Additionally, it is preferred that an appropriate se¬ cretory leader sequence be present, either in the vector or at the 5' end of the portable DNA sequence, the leader sequence being in a position which allows the leader sequence to be imme¬ diately adjacent to the initial portion of the nucleotide se¬ quence capable of directing expression of the protease inhibitor without any intervening transcription or translation termination signals. The presence of the leader sequence is desired in part for one or more of the following reasons: 1) the presence of the leader sequence may facilitate host processing of the initial product to the mature recombinant metalloproteinase inhibitor; 2) the presence of the leader sequence may facilitate purification of the recombinant metalloproteinase inhibitors, through directing the metalloproteinase inhibitor out of the cell cytoplasm; 3) the presence of the leader sequence may affect the ability of the recombinant metalloproteinase inhibitor to fold to its active structure through directing the metalloproteinase in¬ hibitor out of the cell cytoplasm. In particular, the leader sequence may direct cleavage of the initial translation product by a leader peptidase to re¬ move the leader sequence and leave a polypeptide with the amino acid sequence which has the potential of metalloproteinase inhib¬ itory activity. In some species of host microorganisms, the presence of the appropriate leader sequence will allow transport of the completed protein into the periplasmic space, as in the case of E_ ; _ coli. In the case of certain yeasts and strains of Bacillus and Pseudomonas, the appropriate leader sequence will allow transport of the protein through the cell membrane and into the extracellular medium. In this situation, the protein may be purified from extracellular protein. Thirdly, in the case of some of the metalloproteinase inhibitors prepared by the present invention, the presence of the leader sequence may be necessary to locate the completed protein in an environment where it may fold to assume its active struc¬ ture, which structure possesses the appropriate metalloproteinase activity. Additional operational elements include, but are not limited to, ribosome-binding sites and other DNA sequences neces¬ sary for microbial expression of foreign proteins. The opera¬ tional elements as discussed herein can be routinely selected by those of ordinary skill in the art in light of prior literature and the teachings contained herein. General examples of these operational elements are set forth in B. Lewin, Genes, Wiley & Sons, New York (1983), which is specifically incorporated herein by reference. Various examples of suitable operational elements may be found on the vectors discussed above and may be elucidated through review of the publications discussing the basic charac¬ teristics of the aforementioned vectors. In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, an additional DNA sequence is located immediately preceding the portable DNA sequence which codes for the metalloproteinase in¬ hibitor. The additional DNA sequence is capable of functioning as a translational coupler, i.e., it is a DNA sequence that encodes an RNA which serves to position ribosomes immediately adjacent to the ribosome binding site of the metalloproteinase inhibitor RNA with which it is contiguous. Upon synthesis and/or isolation of all necessary and desired component parts of the above-discussed cloning vectors, the vectors are assembled by methods generally known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Assembly of such vectors is believed to be within the duties and tasks performed by those with ordi¬ nary skill in the art and, as such, is capable of being performed without undue experimentation. For example, similar DNA se¬ quences have been ligated into appropriate cloning vectors, as set forth in Schoner et al . , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 81 ^ :5403-5407 (1984), which is specifically incorporated herein by reference. In construction of the cloning vectors of the present invention, it should additionally be noted that multiple copies of the portable DNA sequence and its attendant operational ele¬ ments may be inserted into each vector. In such an embodiment, the host organism would produce greater amounts per vector of the desired metalloproteinase inhibitor. The number of multiple copies of the DNA sequence which may be inserted into the vector is limited only by the ability of the resultant vector, due to its size, to be transferred into and replicated and transcribed in an appropriate host microorganism. Additionally, it is preferred that the cloning vector contain a selectable marker, such as a drug resistance marker or other marker which causes expression of a selectable trait by the host microorganism. In a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the gene for ampicillin resistance is in¬ cluded in vector pUC9-F5/237P10. Such a drug resistance or other selectable marker is intended in part to facilitate in the selection of transformants . Additionally, the presence of such a selectable marker on the cloning vector may be of use in keeping contaminating microorga¬ nisms from multiplying in the culture medium. In this embodi¬ ment, such a pure culture of the transformed host microorganisms would be obtained by culturing the microorganisms under condi¬ tions which require the induced phenotype for survival. It is noted that, in preferred embodiment, it is also desirable to reconstruct the 3 * end of the coding region to allow assembly with 3' non-translated sequences. Included among these non-translated sequences are those which stabilize the mRNA or enhance its transcription and those that provide strong tran- scriptional termination signals which may stabilize the vector as they are identified by Gentz, R. , Langner, A., Chang, A.C.Y., Cohen, S.H., and Bujard, H. in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 7_8_:4936-4940 (1981), specifically incorporated herein by refer¬ ence. This invention also relates to a recombinant-DNA method for the production of metallproteinase inhibitors. Generally, this method includes: (a) preparation of a portable DNA sequence capable of directing a host microorga¬ nism to produce a protein having metalloproteinase inhibitor activity; (b) cloning the portable DNA sequence into a vector capable of being transferred into and replicating in a host microorganism, such vector containing operational ele¬ ments for the portable DNA sequence; (c) transferring the vector containing the portable DNA sequence and operational elements into a host microorganism capa¬ ble of expressing the metalloproteinase inhibitor protein; (d) culturing the host microorganism under conditions appropriate for amplification of the vector and expression- of the in¬ hibitor; and (e) in either order: (i) harvesting the inhibitor; and (ii) causing the inhibitor to assume an active, tertiary structure whereby it possesses metalloproteinase in¬ hibitor activity. In this method, the portable DNA sequences are those synthetic or naturally-occurring polynucleotides described above. In a preferred embodiment of the present method, the portable DNA sequence has the nucleotide sequence as follows: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GTTGTTGCTG TGGCTGATAG CCCCAGCAGG GCCTGCACCT GTGTCCCACC CCACCCACAG 70 80 90 100 110 120 ACGGCCTTCT GCAATTCCGA CCTCGTCATC AGGGCCAAGT TCGTGGGGAC ACCAGAAGTC 130 140 150 160 170 180 AACCAGACCA CCTTATACCA GCGTTATGAG ATCAAGATGA CCAAGATGTA TAAAGGGTTC 190 200 210 220 230 240 CAAGCCTTAG GGGATGCCGC TGACATCCGG TTCGTCTACA CCCCCGCCAT GGAGAGTGTC 250 260 270 280 290 300 TGCGGATACT TCCACAGGTC CCACAACCGC AGCGAGGAGT TTCTCATTGC TGGAAAACTG 310 320 330 340 350 360 CAGGATGGAC TCTTGCACAT CACTACCTGC AGTTTCGTGG CTCCCTGGAA CAGCCTGAGC 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTAGCTCAGC GCCGGGGCTT CACCAAGACC TACACTGTTG GCTGTGAGGA ATGCACAGTG 430 440 450 460 470 480 TTTCCCTGTT TATCCATCCC CTGC\AACTG CAGAGTGGCA CTCATTGCTT GTGGACGGAC 490 500 510 520 530 540 CAGCTCCTCC AAGGCTCTGA AAAGGGCTTC CAGTCCCGTC ACCTTGCCTG CCTGCCTCGG 550 560 570 580 590 600 GAGCCAGGGC TGTGCACCTG GCAGTCCCTG CGGTCCCAGA TAGCCTGAAT CCTGCCCGGA 610 620 630 640 650 660 GTGGAAGCTG AAGCCTGCAC AGTGTCCACC CTGTTCCCAC TCCCATCTTT CTTCCGGACA 670 680 690 700 ATGAAATAAA GAGTTACCAC CCAGCAAAAA AAAAAAGGAA TTC The vectors contemplated as being useful in the present method are those described above. In a preferred embodiment, the cloning vector pUC9-F5/237P10 is used in the disclosed method. The vector thus obtained is then transferred into the appropriate host microorganism. It is believed that any microor¬ ganism having the ability to take up exogenous DNA and express those genes and attendant operational elements may be chosen. It is preferred that the host microorganism be an anaerobe, faculta¬ tive anaerobe or aerobe. Particular hosts which may be prefera¬ ble for use in this method include yeasts and bacteria. Specific yeasts include those of the genus Saccharomyces, and especially Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Specific bacteria include those of the genera Bacillus and Escherichia and Pseudomonas. Various other preferred hosts are set forth in Table I, supra. In other, alternatively pre¬ ferred embodiments of the present invention, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas aeruginosa are selected as the host microorganisms. After a host organism has been chosen, the vector is transferred into the host organism using methods generally known by those of ordinary skill in the art. Examples of such methods may be found in Advanced Bacterial Genetics by R. W. Davis et al. , Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, (1980), which is specifically incorporated herein by reference. It is preferred, in one embodiment, that the transformation occur at low temperatures, as temperature regulation is contemplated as a means of regulating gene expression through the use of opera¬ tional elements as set forth above. In another embodiment, if osmolar regulators have been inserted into the vector, regulation of the salt concentrations during the transformation would be re¬ quired to insure appropriate control of the synthetic genes. If it is contemplated that the recombinant metallopro¬ teinase inhibitors will ultimately be expressed in yeast, it is preferred that the cloning vector first be transferred into Escherichia coli, where the vector would be allowed to replicate and from which the vector would be obtained and purified after amplification. The vector would then be transferred into the yeast for ultimate expression of the metalloproteinase inhibitor. The host microorganisms are cultured under conditions appropriate for the expression of the metalloproteinase inhib¬ itor. These conditions are generally specific for the host or¬ ganism, and are readily determined by one of ordinary skill in the art, in light of the published literature regarding the growth conditions for such organisms, for example Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th Ed., Williams & Wilkins Compa¬ ny, Baltimore, Maryland, which is specifically incorporated here¬ in by reference. Any conditions necessary for the regulation of the ex¬ pression of the DNA sequence, dependent upon any operational ele¬ ments inserted into or present in the vector, would be in effect at the transformation and culturing stages. In one embodiment, the cells are grown to a high density in the presence of appro¬ priate regulatory conditions which inhibit the expression of the DNA sequence. When optimal cell density is approached, the envi¬ ronmental conditions are altered to those appropriate for expres¬ sion of the portable DNA sequence. It is thus contemplated that the production of the metalloproteinase inhibitor will occur in a time span subsequent to the growth of the host cells to near optimal density, and that the resultant metalloproteinase inhib¬ itor will be harvested at some time after the regulatory condi¬ tions necessary for its expression were induced. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the recombinant metalloproteinase inhibitor is purified subsequent to harvesting and prior to assumption of its active structure. This embodiment is preferred as the inventors believe that recovery of a high yield of re-folded protein is facilitated if the protein is first purified. However, in one preferred, alternate embodi¬ ment, the metalloproteinase inhibitor may be allowed re-fold to assume its active structure prior to purification. In yet another preferred, alternate embodiment, the metalloproteinase inhibitor is caused to assume its re-folded, active state upon recovery from the culturing medium. In certain circumstances, the metalloproteinase inhib¬ itor will assume its proper, active structure upon expression in the host microorganism and transport of the protein through the cell wall or membrane or into the periplasmic space. This will generally occur if DNA coding for an appropriate leader sequence has been linked to the DNA coding for the recombinant protein. The preferred metalloprotienase inhibitors of the present inven¬ tion will assume their mature, active form upon translocation out of the inner cell membrane. The structures of numerous signal peptides have been published, for example by Marion E.E. Watson in Nuc. Acid Res. 1_2:515-5164, 1984, specifically incorporated herein by reference. It is intended that these leader sequences, together with portable DNA, will direct intracellular production of a fusion protein which will be transported through the cell membrane and will have the leader sequence portion cleaved upon release from the cell. In a preferred embodiment, the signal peptide of the E.coli OmpA protein is used as a leader sequence and is located in a position contiguous with the portable DNA sequence coding for the metalloproteinese inhibitor structure. Additionally preferred leader sequences include those of ' beta-lactamase, carboxypeptidase G2 and the human signal pro¬ tein. These and other leader sequences are described. If the metalloproteinase inhibitor does not assume its proper, active structure, any disulfide bonds which have formed and/or any noncovalent interactions which have occurred will first be disrupted by denaturing and reducing agents, for exam¬ ple, guanidinium chloride and β -mercaptoethanol, before the metalloproteinase inhibitor is allowed to assume its active structure following dilution and oxidation of these agents under controlled conditions. The transcription terminators contemplated herein serve to stabilize the vector. In particular, those sequences as de¬ scribed by Gentz et al. , in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 4936-4940 (1981), specifically incorporated herein by reference, are contemplated for use in the present invention. It is to be understood that application of the teach¬ ings of the present invention to a specific problem or environ¬ ment will be within the capabilities of one having ordinary skill in the art in light of the teachings contained herein. Examples of the products of the present invention and representative pro¬ cesses for their isolation and manufacture appear in the follow¬ ing examples. EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1 Preparation of Poly(A ) RNA from HEF-S 3AA FFiibbrroobbllaassttss HEF-SA cells were grown to near confluence in 75 cm T-flasks. Cells were washed twice in Dulbeσco's phosphate buffered saline solution and harvested by the addition of 2 ml of 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5 containing 1% w/v SDS (obtained from BDH chem¬ icals, Ltd., Poole, England), 5 mM EDTA and 20 ug/ml protease K (obtained from Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Indiana) . Each flask was subsequently washed with an additional milliliter of this same solution. The pooled aliquots from the cell harvest were made to 70 ug/ml in protease K and incubated at 40°C for 45 minutes. The proteolyzed solution was brought to a NaCl concentration of 150 mM by the addition of 5 M stock and subsequently "extracted with an equal volume of 'phenol:chloroform 1:1. The aqueous phase was reextracted with an equal volume of chloroform. Two volumes of ethanol were added to the aqueous phase and incubated overnight at -20°C. The precipitated nucleic acids were recovered by centrifugation at 17,500 xg for 10 minutes in a Beckman J2-21 centrifuge, Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, California, and were redissolved in 25 ml of 0.1% w/v SDS. This solution was again extracted with an equal volume of chloroform. The aqueous phase was added to two volumes of cold ethanol and kept at -20°C for 2 hours. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 10,000 xg for 15 minutes and redissolved in 10 ml of 1 mM Tris, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, pH 7.5. RNA was precipitated from this solution by the addition of 10 ml of 4 M LiCl, 20 mM NaoAc, pH 5.0 and in¬ cubated at -20°C for 18 hours. The precipitate was again recov¬ ered by centrifugation and washed twice with 2 M LiCl before redissolving in 1 mM Tris, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, pH 7.5. This solution was stored at -70°C. Chromatography on Oligo dT Cellulose Total cellular RNA prepared as above was ethanol pre¬ cipitated and redissolved in 0.5 M NaCl. Five ml of RNA at 0.45 mg/ml were applied to a 1 ml column of washed type VII oligo dT cellulose (obtained from PL Biochemicals, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) . The column was then washed with 10 ml of 0.5 M NaCl and eluted with 2.0 ml of sterile H^O. The eluted poly(A ) fraction of RNA was ethanol precipitated and dissolved to give a 1 mg/ml solution in 1 mM Tris, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0. This was stored at -70°C. cDNA Synthesis Poly(A ) RNA was primed with oligo dT (obtained from PL Biochemicals, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) to serve as a template for cDNA synthesis by AMV reverse transσriptase (obtained from Life Sciences, Inc., St. Petersburg, Florida). Following the synthe¬ sis reaction, the RNA was hydrolyzed by the addition of 0.1 vol¬ ume of 3 N NaOH and incubated at 67°C for 10 minutes. The solu¬ tion was then neutralized and the cDNA purified by gel filtration chromatography on biogel A 1.5 (obtained from BioRad Laboratories, Richmond, California. in a 0.7x25 cm column in a 10 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% SDS, pH 7.5 solution. Fractions con¬ taining cDNA were pooled and concentrated by ethanol precipita¬ tion. The cDNA was dG tailed and purified by gel filtration using the procedure set forth above. Second strand synthesis was primed with oligo dC and -polymerized in an initial reaction with the large (Klenow) fragment of DNA polymerase (obtained from Boehringer Mannheim). Following second strand synthesis, 12. coli DNA polymerase I (obtained from Boehringer Mannheim) was added and incubation continued to form blunt ends. The double stranded cDNA was again purified by chromatography. EcoRI restriction sites within the cDNAs were modified by the action of EcoRI methylase, obtained from New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mas¬ sachusetts. The cDNA was again purified and ligated to synthetic EcoRI linkers. Finally, the ends were then trimmed with the endonuclease and the cDNA purified by gel filtration. This DNA . was ligated into a unique EcoRI site in lambda gtlO DNA packaged in vitro and used to_ infect E_. coli strain hflA according to the method set forth by Huynh, T.V., Young, R.A., and Davis, R.W., in DNA Cloning Techniques, A Practical Approach (ed. Glover, D.M.) (IRL Press Oxford), in press, specifically incorporated herein by reference. Approximately 25,000 recombinants were amplified in this manner. Screening Recombinant-phage-containing sequences of interest were selected by their preferential hybridization to synthetic oligo¬ nucleotides encoding portions of the primary structure of the de¬ sired metalloproteinase inhibitor, hereinafter referred to as FIBAC. These portions of the protein sequence correspond in part to those set forth in the published literature by Stricklin, G.P. and Welgus, H.G., J. Biol. Chem. 258: 12252-12258 (1983), specif¬ ically incorporated herein by reference. Recombinant phage were used to infect E_. coli strain hflA and plated at a density of approximately 2x10 pfu/150 mm petri dish. Phage were blotted onto nitrocellulose filters (BA85, Schleicher & Schuell Inc., Keene, New Hampshire), and DNA was denatured and fixed essential¬ ly as described, by Benton and Davis in Science 196:180-182 (1979) specifically incorporated herein by reference. Using that procedure, the filters were treated sequen¬ tially for 10-15 minutes each in 0.5 M NaCl, then 1.0 M Tris, 1.5 M NaCl pH 8.0, and finally submerged in 2x SSPE. (2x SSPE is 0.36 M NaCl, 20 mM NaH 2 P0 4 , 2 mM EDTA pH 7.4). Filters were blotted dry and baked 75°-80° for 3-4 hours. Duplicate filters were made of each plate. Filters were prehybridized for 1-3 hours at 37° in 5x SSPE containing O.lx SET, 0.15% NaPPi, and lx Denhardts solutions. Filters were then hybridized for 72 hours at 37° in this same solution containing 5x10 cpm/ml of 5' end- labeled 51-mer oligonucleotide specific activity approximately 10 cpm/pmole) . Following hybridization, filters were washed six times in 5x SSPE containing O.lx SET and 0.05% sodium pyro- phosphate at 37°, then three times in 2x SSPE at 21°. These were then blotted dry and autoradiographed on Kodak XAR-5 film at -70° with a Kodak lightening-plus intensifying screen. Signals clearly visible from duplicate filters were used to pick phage for plaque purification. Filter preparations and hybridization procedures for plaque purification steps were the same as above. The washing procedure was simplified to 6 changes of 2x SSPE at 37°. Six isolates purified by repetitive plating were then arranged on a single lawn of E_. coli strain C600 for testing with subsequent probes. Preferential hybridization of the 17-mer to each of the isolates (as opposed to control plaques) was observed under a condition identical to that used for plaque purification. Probe C was used in a similar test, except that the SSPE concentration during hybridization was reduced to 4x. Again, each of the iso¬ lates demonstrated stronger hybridization to the probe than did control plaques. Phage Purification and cDNA Characterization Quantities of each of the six isolated phage were made by the plate stock technique and purified by serial CsCl block gradient centrifugation. DNA was extracted from these by dia¬ lysis against 50% formamide as described by Davis, R.W. , Botstein, D. , Roth, J.R., in A Manual for Genetic Engineering: Advanced Bacterial Genetics, 1980, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, specifically incorporated herein by reference. DNA from each of the-isolates was digested with EcoRI and the products were ana¬ lyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The insert from one of the larger clones, lambda FIBAC 5, was found to lack internal sites for Sail, Hindlll, BamHI, and EcoRI. The cDNA insert was re¬ leased from lambda FIBAC 5 DNA and the lambda arms digested by co-digesting with these four enzymes. The fragments were then ethanol-precipitated and ligated into the EcoRI site of plasmid pUC9 without further purification. These plasmids were then used to transform E . coli strain JM83. Transformants were selected on ampicillin containing plates. Plasmids from several trans- formants were purified and characterized on the basis of the EcoRI digestion products. One was selected which had an insert co-migrating with the insert from lambda FIBAC 5 on agarose gel electrophoresis. This plasmid has been named pUC9-F5/237P10. Mapping and Subcloning The insert in pUC9-F5/237P10 was mapped with respect to internal PstI sites. Double digests with EcoRI and Pst demon¬ strated three internal PstI recognition sites. The entire insert and the component pieces were subcloned into M13 bacteriophage mpl9 and mpl8, respectively. Sequencing of the pieces was per¬ formed by the dideoxynucleotide method described by Sanger et al . in Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A.R. , Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci. USA 1 _:5463-5467 (1977), specifically incorporated herein by reference. The sequence of the DNA insert from pUC9-F5/237P10 showed an open reading frame which encodes the primary structure of a mature fibroblast collagenase inhibitor biologically equiva¬ lent to that isolable from human skin fibroblasts. The salient features of the sequence are: (1) The insert is flanked by EcoRI restric¬ tion sites and by G/C and A/T homo- polymeric tracts consistent with the cloning methodology; (2) The coding strand is presented in the 5' to 3 ' convention with poly C at the 5 ' • end and poly A at the 3 ' end, again con¬ sistent with the techniques employed; (3) If the first G in the sequence GTTGTTG immediately adjacent to the 3 ' end of the poly C tract is considered as nucleotide 1, then an open reading frame is presented which encodes the primary structure of the mature human fibroblast collagenase inhibitor beginning at nucleotide 34 and continuing through nucleotide 585; (4) The termination codon TGA at nucleotides 586 through 588 defines the carboxy ter¬ minus of the translation product which is the same as that of the mature pro¬ tein; (5) Nucleotides 1 through 33 define an amino acid sequence which is not found in the primary structure of the processed pro¬ tein, but which is probably a portion of a leader peptide characteristic of se¬ creted proteins; (6) The three internal PstI sites have as their first base nucleotides 298, 327, and 448; (7) There is a single recognition sequence for the restriction enzyme Tthllll beginning at nucleotide 78; and (8) There is a single recognition sequence for the restriction endonuclease Ncol beginning at nucleotide 227. The sequence of nucleotides 1 through 703 and restriction site analysis are shown. # SITES FRAGMENTS FRAGMENTS ENDS ACC 1 (GTVWAC) 1 214 495 (69.8) 214 709 214 (30.2) 1 214 ALU 1 (AGCT) 358 .358 (50.5) 1 358 363 124 (17.5) 482 606 482 119 (16.8) 363 482 606 103 (14.5) 606 709 5 ( 0.7) 358 363 AVA 1 (CQCGPG) 536 536 (75.6) 1 536 173 (24.4) 536 709 AVA 2 (GGRCC) 257 257 (36.2) 1 257 477 220 (31.0) 257 477 572 137 (19.3) 572 709 95 (13.4) 477 572 BBV 1 (GCTGC) 269 440 (62.1) 269 709 269 (37.9) 1 269 # SITES FRAGMENTS FRAGMENTS END; BST Nl (CCRGG) 3 344 344 (48.5) 1 344 544 200 (28.2) 344 544 557 152 (21.4) 557 709 13 ( 1.8) 544 557 DDE 1 (CTNAG) 4 186 344 (48.5) 365 709 355 186 (26.2) 1 186 360 169 (23.8) 186 355 365 5 ( 0.7) 360 365 5 ( 0.7) 355 360 ECO RI (GAATTC) 1 1 698 698 (98.4) 1 698 11 ( 1.6) 698 709 FNU4H 1 (GCNGC) 2 196 440 (62.1) 269 709 269 196 (27.6) 1 196 73 (10.3) 196 269 FOK 1 (GGATG) 4 192 274 (38.6) 435 709 204 192 (27.1) 1 192 303 132 (18.6) 303 435 435 99 (14.0) 204 303 12 ( 1.7) 192 204 HAE 2 (PGCGCQ) 368 368 (51.9) 1 368 341 (48.1) 368 709 # SITES FRAGMENTS FRAGMENTS END HAE 3 (GGCC) 3 30 616 (86.9) 93 709 63 30 ( 4.7) 30 63 93 30 ( 4.2) 63 93 30 ( 4.2) 1 30 HGI Al (GRGCRC) 1 552 552 (77.9) 1 552 157 (22.1) 552 709 HHA 1 (GCGC) 1 369 369 (52.0) 1 369 340 (48.0) 369 709 HINC 2 (GTQPAC) 1 118 591 (83.4) 118 709 118 (16.6) 1 118 HINF 1 (GANTC) 2 308 308 (43.4)" 1 308 587 279 (39.4) 308 587 122 (17.2) 587 709 HPA 2 (CCGG) 4 207 224 (31.6) 372 596 372 207 (29.2) 1 207 596 165 (23.3) 207 372 654 58 ( 8.2) 596 654 55 ( 7.8) 654 709 HPH 1 (GGTGA) 2 - ' 380 380 (53.6) 1 380 519 190 (26.8) 519 709 139 (19.6) 380 519 MBO 2 (GAAGA) 1 650 650 (91.7) 1 650 59 ( 8.3) 650 709 # SITES FRAGMENTS FRAGMENTS ENDS MNL 1 (CCTC) 5 81 193 (27. ■ 2) 81 274 274 174 (24. ,5) 535 709 406 132 (18. ■ 6) 274 406 486 81 (11. ,4) 1 81 535 80 (11. ,3) 406 486 49 ( 6. ,9) 486 535 MST 2 (CCTNAGG) 1 185 524 (73, .9) 185 709 185 (26. .1) 1 185 NCI 1 (CCSGG) 2 372 372 (52. .5) 1 372 595 223 (31, .5) 372 595 114 (16, .1) 595 709 NCO 1 (CCATGG) 1 227 482 (68. .0) 227 709 227 (32. .0) 1 227 NSP B2 ( CVGCWG ) 1 197 512 (72.2) 197 709 197 (27.8) 1 197 PST 1 ( CTGCAG ) 298 298 (42.0) 1 298 327 261 (36.8) 448 709 448 121 (17.1) 327 448 29 ( 4.1) 298 327 SAU 1 ( CCTNAGG ) 1 185 524 (73.9) 185 709 185 (26.1) 1 185 SAU 3A ( GATC ) 150 559 ( 78 . 8 ) 150 709 SITES FRAGMENTS FRAGMENTS ENDS 150 (21.2) 1 150 SAU96 1 (GGNCC) 5 29 220 (31.0) 257 477 92 165 (23.3) 92 257 257 137 (19.3) 572 709 477 95 (13.4) 477 572 572 63 ( 8.9) 29 92 29 ( 4.1) 1 29 SCR Fl (CCNGG) 344 344 (48.5) 1 344 372 172 (24.3) 372 544 544 114 (16.1) 595 709 557 38 ( 5.4) 557 595 595 28 ( 3.9) 344 372 13 ( 1.8) 544 557 SFA Nl (GATGC) 193 516 (72.8) 193 709 193 (27.2) 1 193 TTH111 1 (GACNNNGTC) 79 630 (88.9) 79 709 79 (11.1) 1 79 The following do not appear: AAT 2 AFL 2 AFL 3 AHA- 3 APA 1 ASU 2 AVA 3 AVR 2 BAL 1 BAM HI BCL 1 BGL 1 BGL 2 BIN 1 BSSH 1 BST E2 CFR 1 CLA 1 ECO R5 FNUD 2 GDI 2 HAE 1 HGA 1 HGI Cl HGI Dl HGI J2 HIND 3 HPA 1 KPN 1 MLU 1 MST 1 NAE 1 NAR 1 NDE 1 NRU 1 NSP Cl PVU 1 PVU 2 RRU 1 RSA 1 SAC 1 SAC 2 SAL 1 SMA 1 SNA 1 SPH 1 STU 1 TAQ 1 XBA 1 XHO 1 XHO 2 XMA 3 XMN 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 GTTGTTGCTG TGGCTGATAG CCCCAGCAGG GCCTGCACCT GTGTCCCACC CCACCCACAG SH AA UE 13 70 80 90 100 110 120 ACGGCCTTCT GCAATTCCGA CCTCGTCATC AGGGCCAAGT TCGTGGGGAC ACCAGAAGTC H T M SH H A T N AA I E H L UE N 3 1 1 13 2 • 130 140 150 160 170 180 AACCAGACCA CCTTATACCA GCGTTATGAG ATCAAGATGA CCAAGATGTA TAAAGGGTTC S A U A 190 200 210 220 230 240 CAAGCCTTAG GGGATGCCGC TGACATCCGG TTCGTCTACA CCCCCGCCAT GGAGAGTGTC SD FS FN F H A N AD OF NS O P C C UE KA UP K A C 0 11 11 12 1 2 1 1 250 260 270 280 290 300 TGCGGATACT TCCACAGGTC CCACAACCGC AGCGAGGAGT TTCTCATTGC TGGAAAACTG A B M P V B N S A V L T 2 1 1 1 310 320 330 340 350 360 CAGGATGGAC TCTTGCACAT CACTACCTGC AGTTTCGTGG CTCCCTGGAA CAGCCTGAGC F H P B D A D 0 I S S D L D K N T T E U E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTAGCTCAGC GCCGGGGCTT CACCAAGACC TACACTGTTG GCTGTGAGGA ATGCACAGTG A D HH N H M L D AH C P N U E EA I H L 1 1 21 1 1 1 430 440 450 460 470 480 TTTCCCTGTT TATCCATCCC CTGCAAACTG CAGAGTGGCA CTCATTGCTT GTGGACGGAC F P A O S V K • T A 1 1 ' 2 490 500 510 520 530 540 CAGCTCCTCC AAGGCTCTGA AAAGGGCTTC CAGTCCCGTC ACCTTGCCTG CCTGCCTCGG M H MA L N P NV U L H LA 1 1 -1 ' 11 550 560 570 580 590 600 GAGCCAGGGC TGTGCACCTG GCAGTCCCTG CGGTCCCAGA TAGCCTGAAT CCTGCCCGGA B H B A H NH S G S V I CP T I T A N IA 1 1 1 2 1 12 610 620 630 640 650 660 GTGGAAGCTG AAGCCTGCAC AGTGTCCACC CTGTTCCCAC TCCCATCTTT CTTCCGGACA A M H L B P U 0 A 1 2 2 670 680 690 700 ATGAAATAAA GAGTTACCAC CCAGCAAAAA AAAAAAGGAA TTC E C 0 1 EXAMPLE 2-EXPRESSION OF COLLAGENESE INHIBITOR IN E. COLI In this Example, a preferred method of coupling a pre¬ ferred portable DNA sequence to the 5 ' end of the cloned cDNA is set forth. This involves making a nucleolytic cleavage at a specified point within the coding sequence and reconstructing the desired portion 'of the coding sequence by means of synthetic oligonucleotides in a manner that allows its excision and recom¬ bination (i.e., by incorporating useful restriction sites). Trimming the 5 ' end of the coding region will be accomplished by synthesizing both strands of the DNA extending from the Tthllll site in the 5 ' direction and ending in a Ba HI overhang. This synthetic oligonucleotide, referred to as FIBAC A, has the following features: (1) Codon selection has been biased toward those most frequently found in the genes of highly expressed bacterial proteins; (2) A methionine codon from which to initiate transla¬ tion has been provided immediately upstream from the cysteine which begins the coding region of human processed FIBAC; (3) The spacing of the BamHI site to the methionine codon is such that when cloned into pUC8, the coding region of FIBAC will be in-frame with the 5 ' end of the beta-galactosidase gene; (4) An in-frame stop codon and Shine Dalgarno sequence are also presented. Translation of this frame for the amino terminal portion of the beta- galactosidase is terminated at the TAA codon, and translation of FIBAC should be initiated at the following ATG; (5) Codons have been selected to create a HgiAI site beginning with the G in the FIBAC initiation codon; and (6) There is a Pvul site separated by one base from the 3 1 end of the BamHI sequence. The structure of FIBAC A is GA TCC GCG ATC GGA GTG TAA GAA ATG TGC ACT G CGC TAG CCT CAC ATT CTT TAC ACG TGA TGC GTT CCG CCG CAT CCG CAG ACT GCT TTC ACG CAA GGC GGC GTA GGC GTC TGA CGA AAG TGC AAC TCT GAC C ACG TTG AGA CTG GA FIBAC A is synthesized using the ABI DNA synthesizer (Foster City, California) as a series of four component oligonucleotides. Component oligonucleotide FA1 is: GATCC GCGAT CGGAG TGTAA GAAAT GTGCA CTTGC Component oligonucleotide FA2 is: GGAACG CAAGT GCACA TTTCT TACAC TCCGA TCGCG Component oligonucleotide FA3 is: GTTC CGCCG CATCC GCAGA CTGCT TTCTG ^ CAACT CTGAC C Component oligonucleotide FA4 is: AGGTC AGAGT TGCAG AAAGC AGTCT GCGGA TGCGG C The remainder of the coding portion of the FIBAC gene is isolated as the 3 ' Tthllll to EcoRI fragment generated by a double digest of pUC9-F5/237P10 with these enzymes. A synthetic linker is made to couple the 3 ' end of the Tthllll to EcoRI fragment to a Sail site. These oligonucleotides will be designed to recreate the Sail site and destroy the EcoRI site. The linker is comprised of the oligonucleotides linker Al and linker A2. Linker Al is: AATTGGCAG Linker A2 is: TCGACTGCC These oligonucleotides and oligonucleotides FA1-FA4 are kinased separately and annealed in equal molar ratios with the Tthllll to EcoRI 3' end of the cDNA and BamHI/Sail cut mpl9RF DNA. The ligated DNA is used to transfect JM105. Plaques are picked by their color in the presence of IPTG and X-gal and by hybridization to oligonucleotide FA2. Several positive plaques are to be sequenced. Those containing the designed sequence are subcloned into BamHI/Sail digested pUC8. Translation of the FIBAC gene in this construct is coupled to translation initiated for beta-galactosidase. This expression vector is referred to as pUC8-Fic. Coupling translation of FIBAC to translation initiated for other highly expressed proteins is similarly arranged. For example, a portion of the OmpA gene which contains the Shine- Dalgarno and initiator methionine sequences has been synthesized. This sequence encodes the entire signal peptide of OmpA protein and had convenient restriction sites, including those for EcoRI, EcoRV, Pvul, and StuI . The sequence of the sense strand is: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GAATTCGATA TCTCGTTGGA GATATTCATG ACGTATTTTG GATGATAACG AGGCGCAAAA E T E F M H C A C 0 N H O Q O K L A 1 1 5 1 1 1 70 80 90 100 110 AATGAAAAAG ACAGCTATCG CGATCGCAGT GGCACTGGCT GGTTTCGCTA CCGTA A NF PS L RN VA U UU UU 1 12 1A 120 130 GCGCA GGCCTCTGGT AAAAGCTT H S H M HA H T A N IL A U E L NU 1 1 3 1 31 This sequence is hereinafter referred to as OmpA lead¬ er. Coupling the translation of FIBAC to OmpA is accomplished by cutting the pUC8-Fic with Pvul and Sail and isolating the coding region. This, together with the EcoRI to Pvul fragment isolated from OmpA* leader, will be cloned into EcoRl/Sall-cut pUC8. As in the prior example, transcription is driven by the lac promoter and regulated by the lac I gene product at the lac operator. This FIBAC expression vector is referred to as pUC8-F/θmpAiσ. To effect the translocation of FIBAC across the inner cell membrane, an appropriate leader sequence is added to the amino terminus of FIBAC. The protein thus produced will be translocated and processed to yield the mature form. To effect such a translocation, a FIBAC gene encoding the signal peptide of the E. coli OmpA protein continuous with the structural region of FIBAC is created. This particular FIBAC gene necessitates having in frame stop codons at the 5 ' end of the FIBAC coding region changed. To accomplish this, the portion of the 5 ' coding region from pUC8-Fic that extends from the HgiAI site to the Ncol site is isolated. Upstream sequences are resynthesized as a linker having cohesive ends from BamHI and HgiAI and containing an internal StuI site. This is synthesized as two oligonucleotides, linker Bl and linker B2. Linker Bl is: GATCCCAGGCCTGCA Linker B2 is: GGCCTGG Linkers Bl and B2 are kinased separately and annealed in equal molar ratios with the HgiAI to Ncol fragment described above and BamHI/Ncol cut pUC8-Fiσ. The resulting construct has the coding sequence of FIBAC in frame with the translation of the amino terminus of beta-galactosidase. Translation of this se¬ quence forms a fusion protein with FIBAC. This plasmid is referred to as pUC8-Ff. Attaching the OmpA leader sequences to the coding re¬ gion of FIBAC is accomplished by ligating EcoRl/StuI cut pUC8-Ff with an excess of the purified EcoRI to StuI fragment of OmpA leader. Following transformation, plasmids from several colonies will be characterized by hybridization. Those that have incorpo¬ rated the OmpA leader fragment are characterized further to veri¬ fy the structure. This plasmid, pUC8-F OmpAl, will direct the synthesis of a fusion protein beginning in the signal peptide of t - l e E. coli OmpA protein and ending in human FIBAC. The signals present in the OmpA portion of the protein effect the protein's export from the cytoplasm and appropriate cleavage from the pri¬ mary structure of FIBAC. If the efficiency of expression were to be compromised by the sequence of the leader peptide or its combination with FIBAC either at the protein or at the nucleic acid level, the gene could be altered to encode any of several known E. coli leader sequences. Transcription of all of the genes discussed is effected by the lac promoter. As in the case of initiation sites for translation, the promoter and operator region of the gene may be interchanged. FIBAC may also be expressed from vectors incor¬ porating the lambda P J τ -i promoter and operator (O τ Li) , and the hybrid promoter operator, Tac as described in Amann, E., Brosius, J., and Ptashne, M. Gene 25_:167-178 (1983), specifically incorporated herein by reference. Excision of those portions of the gene including ribosome binding site structural region and 3 ' non- translated sequences and insertion in alternate vectors contain¬ ing the P or Tac promoter makes use of the unique restriction sites that flank these structures in pUC8-F/θmpAic and pUC8-F/θmpAl. Insertion of the EcoRI to Sail fragment from either into similarly digested plasmid pDP8 effects transcription of these genes directed by the lambda P promoter. Transcrip- tional regulation would be temperature sensitive by merit of the cl857 mutation harbored on this same plasmid. Putting similar gene fragments into the transcription unit of the Tac promoter will be accomplished by first isolating the EcoRV to Sail fragment. This, together with the synthetic Tac promoter sequence which is flanked by BamHI and PvulI sites and which contains the lac operator will be inserted into the BamHI to Sail sites of pBR322 or preferably derivatives. The de¬ rivatives in this case refer to constructs containing either the lad gene or the I*- * - gene. Expression of FIBAC in host microorganisms other than Escherichia is considered. Yeast and bacteria of the genera Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Clostridium may each offer particular advantages. The processes outlined above could easily be adapted to others. In general, expression vectors for any microorganism will embody features analogous to those which we have incorpo¬ rated in the above mentioned vectors of E. coli. In some cases, it will be possible to simply move the specific gene constructs discussed above directly into a vector compatible with the new host. In others, it may be necessary or desirable to alter cer¬ tain operational or structural elements of the gene. EXAMPLE 3 The human collagenase inhibitor may be readily purified after expression in a variety of microbes. In each case, the spectrum of contaminant proteins will differ. Thus, appropriate purification steps will be selected from a variety of steps already known to give a good separation of the human collagenase inhibitor from other proteins and from other procedures which are likely to work. If the inhibitor is not secreted from the microbes, it may form inclusion bodies inside the recombinant microbes. These bodies are separated from other proteins by differential centrifugation after disruption of the cells with a French Press. The insoluble inclusion bodies are solubilized in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride or 8 M urea, and the inhibitor protein is more com¬ pletely solubilized by reaction of its cysteines with sodium sulfite. At any time subsequent to this step, the cysteines are converted back to their reduced form with dithiothreitol . Once the inhibitor protein is solubilized from inclusion bodies, immunoaffinity chromatography using antibodies raised against the unfolded inhibitor are used for purification before refolding. The inhibitor can be refolded according to the protocol mentioned in Example 6, infra. After refolding of the inhibitor, or if the inhibitor is secreted from the microbes, purification from other proteins is accomplished by a variety of methods. Initial steps include ultrafiltration through a 50 K dalton cut¬ off membrane or ammonium sulfate fractionation. Other useful methods include, but are not limited to, ion-exchange chromatography, gel filtration, heparin-sepharose chromatography, reversed-phase chromatography, or zinc-chelate chromatography. All of these steps have een successfully used in purification protocols. Additional high resolution steps include hydrophobic interaction chromatography or immunoaffinity chromatography. After purification, the metalloproteinase inhibitor is preferably at least 90-95% pure. EXAMPLE 4 Purification of Human Collagenase Inhibitor from Human Amniotic Fluid Human amniotic fluid obtained from discarded amniocentesis samples was pooled and 6 liters were subjected to ultrafiltration through a 100 kD MW cutoff filter, obtained from Millipore Corporation, in a Millipore Pellicon Cassette System. The eluate was concentrated through a 10 kD cutoff filter, obtained from Millipore Corporation, then through an Amicon PM-10 membrane. Aliquots (10 ml) of concentrated amniotic fluid were eluted through a 2.5 x 100 cm column of Ultrogel AcA54, obtained from LKB Corporation, which was equilibrated with pH 7.6, 0.05 M hepes, 1 M sodium chloride, 0.01 M calcium chloride, and 0.02% sodium azide (all chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company) . Fractions containing the inhibitor were collected and pooled, dialyzed against pH 7.5, 0.025 M Hepes buffer containing 0.01 M calcium chloride and 0.02% sodium azide, and loaded onto a 1.5 x 28 cm heparin-sepharose CL-6B (obtained from Pharmacia, Inc.) column equilibrated with the same buffer. This column was rinsed with 1 liter of the above buffer and eluted with a linear gradient of 0-0.3 M sodium chloride. The fractions from the largest peak of inhibitor activity, eluting at about 0.1-0.15 M sodium chloride, were pooled, concentrated to 1 ml, and loaded onto a Synchropak rp-8 reverse phase HPLC column equilibrated with 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (Aldrich Chemical Company) . The column was eluted with a linear gradient of 0-40% acetonitrile (J. T. Baker Chemical Company) at 1/2% per minute. All fractions were immediately dried in a Savant speed-vac concentrator to re¬ move acetonitrile, and redissolved in pH 7.5, 0.1 M Hepes before assay. The inhibitor eluted between 32-38% acetonitrile. Frac¬ tions containing the inhibitor were pooled, and 100 ul aliquots were eluted over a Bio-rad biosil-TSK 250 HPLC gel filtration column. The pooled peaks of inhibitor activity contained 0.1 mg of inhibitor, which was over 95% pure as judged by SDS- poly- acrylamide gel electrophoresis. EXAMPLE 5 Purification of Human Fibroblast Collagenase Inhibitor from Human Embryonic Skin Fibroblast Serum-Free Medium Human embryonic skin fibroblasts were grown in serum- free tissue culture medium. Ten liters of this medium were col¬ lected, dialyzed against pH 7.5, 0.02 M hepes buffer containing 0.02% sodium azide and 0.01 M calcium chloride, and applied to a 2.8 x 48 cm column of heparin-sepharose CL-6B (Pharmacia, Inc.) equilibrated with the same buffer. The column was rinsed with 2 liters of this buffer and was then eluted with linear gradient of 0-0.3 M sodium chloride contained in this buffer. The fractions obtained were tested for the presence of inhibitor by their abil¬ ity to inhibit human fibroblast collagenase. The fractions cor¬ responding to the peak of activity were those obtained near 0.15 M sodium chloride. These fractions were concentrated to about 5 ml by ultrafiltration through an Amicon YM10 filter and the con¬ centrate was applied in four separate runs to a 250 x 4.1 mm Synchropak rp-8 reverse phase HPLC column, equilibrated with 1% trifluoroacetic acid. The column was eluted with a 0-60% linear gradient of acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The gra¬ dient was run at 1/2% acetontrile per minute. The inhibitor eluted in two sharp peaks between 26-29% acetonitrile. All frac¬ tions were immediately dried in a Savant speed-vac concentrator, redissolved in pH 7.5, 0.1 M Hepes, and assayed. At least 1.2 mg of collagenase inhibitor was recovered, which was 90-95% pure. This material gives a single band when run on a 17.5% reducing SDS gel. After carboxymethylation of the cysteines and elution through the same RP-8 column under identical conditions, the in¬ hibitor is suitably homogenous for protein sequencing. EXAMPLE 6 It is contemplated that the human collagenase inhibitor can be readily refolded into its native structure from its dena¬ tured state after expression of its gene in a microbe and separa¬ tion of the collagenase inhibitor from most of the other proteins produced by the microbe. By analogy to the conditions necessary for the refolding of other disulfide-containing proteins as set forth by Freedman, R. B. and Hillson, D. A., in "Formation of Disulfide Bonds," In: The Enzymology of Post-Translational Modification of Proteins, Vol. 1, R. B. Freedman and H. C. Hawkins, eds., pp. 158-207 (1980), specifically incorporated herein by reference, refolding of the human collagenase inhibitor should occur in solutions with a pH of 8.0 or greater. At this pH, the cysteines of the protein are partially ionized, and this condition is necessary for the attainment of native disulfide bond pairings. The inhibitor concentration should be relatively low, less than 0.1 mg/ml, to minimize the formation of intermolecular disulfide-linked aggregates which will interfere with the refolding process . Since the stability of the refolded (native) disulfide bonded structure relative to the unfolded (reduced) structure depends on both the solution oxidation-reduction potential and the concentrations of other redox-active molecules, it is contem¬ plated that the redox potential should be buffered with a redox buffer giving a potential equivalent to a reduced: oxidized glutathione ratio of 10. The preferred concentration range of reduced glutathione would be 0.1-1.0 mM. At higher concentra¬ tions, mixed disulfides will form with protein, reducing the yield of the refolded (native) structure. The relative stabilities of the unfolded protein and the native structure, and thus the rate and yield of refolding, will also depend on other solution variables, such as the pH, temperature, type of hydrogen-ion buffer, ionic strength, and the presence or absence of particular anions or cations as discussed in Privalov, P. L. , "Stability of Proteins, Small Globular Proteins," in Advances in Protein Chemistry, Vol. 33, pp. 167-236, (1979), specifically in¬ corporated herein by reference. These conditions vary for every protein and can be determined experimentally. It is contemplated that addition of any molecule that strongly prefers to bind the native (as opposed to the unfolded) structure, and which can be readily separated afterwards from the native (refolded) protein, will increase not only the yield but the rate of re-folding. These molecules include monoclonal antibodies raised against the native structure, and other proteins which tightly bind- the na¬ tive collagenase inhibitor, such as the mammalian enzymes col¬ lagenase or gelatinase. Example 7 The second preferred sequence as set forth herein, i.e., 10 20 30 40 50 60 GGCCATCGCC GCAGATCCAG CGCCCAGAGA GACACCAGAG AACCCACCAT GGCCCCCTTT H F XB HH N S A N HI AH C A E U ON EA 0 U 3 1 21 21 1 1 70 80 90 100 110 120 GACCCCTGGC TTCTGCATCC TGTTGTTGCT GTGGCTGATA GCCCCAGCAG GGCCTGCACC B SF S H S FO A A T AK ' U E 1 11 1 3 130 140 150 160 170 180 TGTGTCCCAC CCCACCCACA GACGGCCTTC TGCAATTCCG ACCTCGTCAT CAGGGCCAAG H T M SH A T N AA E H L UE 3 1 1 13 190 200 210 220 230 240 TTCGTGGGGA CACCAGAAGT CAACCAGACC ACCTTATACC AGCGTTATGA GATCAAGATG H S 1 A N U 2 A 250 260 270 280 290 300 ACCAAGATGT ATAAAGGGTT CCAAGCCTTA GGGGATGCCG CTGACATCCG GTTCGTCTAC SD FS FN F H A AD OF NS O P C UE KA UP K A C 11 11 12 1 2 1 310 320 330 340 350 360 ACCCCCGCCA TGGAGAGTGT CTGCGGATAC TTCCACAGGT CCCACAACCG CAGCGAGGAG N B M C V B N 0 A V L 1 2 1 1 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTTCTCATTG CTGGAAAACT GCAGGATGGA CTCTTGCACA TCACTACCTG CAGTTTCGTG P F H P .S O I S T K N T 1 1 1 1 430 GCTCCCTGGA AC B S T 1 has the following restriction sites: # SITES FRAGMENTS FRAGMENTS ENDS ACC 1 (GTVWAC) 295 295 (68.3) 1 295 137 (31.7) 295 432 AVA 2 (GGRCC) 338 338 (78.2) 1 338 94 (21.8) 338 432 BBV 1 (GCTGC) 350 350 (81.0) 1 350 82 (19.0) 350 432 BIN 1 (GGATC) 14 418 (96.8) 14 432 14 ( 3.2) 1 14 BST Nl (CCRGG) 2 65 360 (83.3) ,-65.- 425 425 65 (15.0) " 1 65 7 ( 1.6) 425 432 DDE 1 (CTNAG) SITES FRAGMENTS FRAGMENTS ENDS 267 267 (61.8) 1 267 165 (38.2) 267 432 FNU4H 1 (GCNGC) 8 269 (62.3) 8 277 277 82 (19.0) 350 432 350 73 (16.9) 277 350 8 ( 1.9) 1 8 FOK 1 (GGATG) 76 197 (45.6) 76 273 273 99 (22.9) 285 384 285 76 (17.6) 1 76 384 48 (11.1) 384 432 12 ( 2.8) 273 285 HAE 2 (PGCGCQ) 19 413 (95.6) 19 432 19 ( 4.4) 1 19 HAE 3 (GGCC) 1 258 (59.7) 174 432 51 60 (13.9) 51 111 111 50 (11.6) 1 51 144 33 ( 7.6) 111 144 174 30 ( 6.9) 144 174 1 ( 0.2) 1 1 HHA 1 (GCGC) 20 412 (95.4) 20 432 20 ( 4.6) 1 20 SITES FRAGMENTS FRAGMENTS ENDS HINC 2 (GTQPAC) 199 233 (53.9) 199 432 199 (46.1) 1 199 HINF 1 (GANTC) 389 389 (90.0) 1 389 43 (10.0) 389 432 HPA 2 (CCGG) 288. 288 (66.7) 1 288 144 (33.3) 288 432 MNL 1 (CCTC) 2 162 193 (44.7) 162 355 355 1.62 (37.5) 1 162 77 (17.8) 355 432 MST 2 (CCTNAGG) 1 266 266 (61.6) 1 266 166 (38.4) 266 432 NCO 1 (CCATGG) 2 47 261 (60.4) 47 308 308 124 (28.7) 308 432 47 (10.9) 1 47 NSP B2 (CVGCWG) 1 278 278 (64.4) 1 278 154 (35.6) 278 432 SITES FRAGMENTS FRAGMENTS ENDS PST 1 (CTGCAG) 379 379 (87.7) 1 379 408 29 ( 6.7) 379 408 24 ( 5.6) 408 432 SAU 1 (CCTNAGG) 266 266 (61.6) 1 266 166 (38.4) 266 432 SAU 3A (GATC) 14 217 (50.2) 14 231 231 201 (46.5) 231 432 14 ( 3.2) 1 14 SAU96 1 (GGNCC) 51 165 (38.2) 173 338 110 94 (21.8) 338 432 173 63 (14.6) 110 173 338 * 59 (13.7) 51 110 51 (11.8) 1 51 SCR Fl (CCNGG) 65 360 (83.3) 65 425 425 65 (15.0) 1 65 7 ( 1.6) 425 432 SFA Nl (GATGC) 75 199 (46.1) 75 274 274 158 (36.6) 274 432 75 (17.4) 1 75 SITES FRAGMENTS FRAGMENTS ENDS STY 1 (CCRRGG) 47 261 (60.4) 47 308 308 124 (28.7) 308 432 47 (10.9) 1 47 TTHlll 1 (GACNNNGTC) 1 160 272 (63.0) 160 432 160 (37.0) 1 160 XHO 2 (PGATCQ) 13 419 (97 .0) 13 432 13 ( 3 .0) 1 13 it appear: AAT 2 AFL 2. AFL 3 AHA 2. AHA 3 ALU 1 APA 1 ASU 2 AVA 1 AVA 3 AVR 2 BAL 1 BAM HI BAN 1 BAN 2 BCL 1 BGL 1 BGL 2 BSM 1 BSP 1286 nSSH 1 BST E2 CFR 1 CLA 1 ECO RI ECO R5 FNUD 2 GDI 2 HAE 1 HGA 1 HGI Al HGI Cl HGI Dl HGI J2 HIND 3 HPA 1 HPH 1 KPN 1 MBO 2 MLU 1 MST 1 NAE 1 NAR 1 NCI 1 NDE 1 NHE 1 NOT 1 NRU 1 NSP Cl PVU 1 PVU 2 RRU 1 RSA 1 SAC 1 SAC 2 SAL 1 SCA 1 SMA 1 SNA 1 SNA Bl SPE 1 SPH 1 SSP 1 STU 1 TAQ 1 XBA 1 XHO 1 XMA 3 XMN 1 The salient features of this cDNA are: 1. The coding strand is presented in the 5 ' to 3 ' convention with the polyC tract at the 5' end. 2. If the first G in the sequence GGC CAT CGC CGC is considered as nucleotide 1, then an open reading frame exists from nucleotide 1 through nucleotide 432, which is the 3 ' end of this partial cDNA. 3. The first methionine in this reading frame is encoded by nucleotides 49 through 51 and represents the initiation site of translation. 4. The amino acid sequence prescribed by nucleotides 49 through 114 is not found in the primary structure of the mature protein, but it is the sequence of the leader peptide of human protein. 5. The sequence of nucleotides 82 through 432 is identical to the sequence of nucleotides numbered 1 through 351 in the insert from the first preferred se¬ quence of Example 1. 6. The amino acid sequence of the mature protein displays two consensus sequences for sugar attachment. These sequences, -N-Q-T- prescribed by nucleotides 202 through 210 and -N-R-S- prescribed by nucleotides 346 through 354, are amino acid residues 30 through 32 and 78 through 80, respectively, in the mature protein. Both sites are glycosylated in the human inhibitor protein. EXAMPLE 8 A series of expression vectors have been constructed which direct the transcription and translation of the FIBAC gene in E. coli. A. Expression Vector pFib51 The first of these constructions is a derivative of plasmid pUC8 which contains the coding region of the human fibroblast collagenase inhibitor ("FIBAC") gene arranged in such a way as to allow its transcription to be directed and regulated by the lac promoter and operator. This construct, pFib51, was made with minor modification of the procedure outlined in Example Two for the assembly of expression vector pUC8-Fic. Trimming of the 5 ' end of the coding region was effected by isolating that piece of DNA extending from the Haelll site at nucleotide 93 through the 3 ' EcoRI site beginning at nucleotide 698. Reconstruction of the 5' end was accomplished as described except that oligonucleotides FA3 and FA4 were each lengthened by 12 bases to extend the reconstruction to the Haelll recognition site. Hence, the structure of FIBAC A' was created: GA TCC GCG ATC GGA GTG TAA GAA G CGC. TAG CCT CAC ATT CTT ATG TGC ACT TGC GTT CCG CCG CAT . TAC ACG TGA ACG CAA GGC GGC GTA CCG CAG ACT GCT TTC TGC AAC TCT GGC GTC TGA CGA AAG ACG TTG AGA GAC CTG GTG ATC AGG G CTG GAC CAC TAG TCC C The salient features of FIBAC A' have remained as described in Example 2. A synthetic linker was made to couple the 3 ' end of the Haelll to EcoRI fragment to a Sail site. These oligonucleotides were designed to recreate the Sail site and to destroy their EcoRI site. In addition, the linkers were modified from the original description to include an internal Kpnl site. The new linker is comprised of the oligonucleotides "modified-linker Al" and "modified-linker A2." Modified-linker Al is: AATTGGTACCAG Modified-linker A2 is: TCGACTGGTACC Ligation into M13 mpl9, cloning, and selection were es¬ sentially as described in previous Examples. The coding region of FIBAC was removed from a clone with the designed sequence by di¬ gestion with BamHI and Hindlll and subcloned into these restric¬ tion sites in pUC8. The resulting plasmid is pFibδl. In this plasmid, the transcription of the FIBAC gene is directed by the lac promoter. Translation of methionyl FIBAC is coupled to translation initiated for beta-galactosidase. B. Expression Vector pFib55 Creation of the HgiAI restriction site at the 5 ' end of the mature FIBAC coding sequence would allow the entire FIBAC coding sequence to be portable via a HgiAl/Sall, Kpnl, or Hindlll double digestion in plasmid pFib51, except for another HgiAI site at position 552 within the coding sequence. This restriction site was removed using jLn vitro oligonucleotide-direσted, site- specific mutagenesis essentially as described by Zoller and Smith in Methods in Enzymology 100:468, specifically incorporated here¬ in by reference. Single-stranded DNA isolated from a derivative of bacteriophage mpl8 containing the met-FIBAC gene translationally coupled to lacZ as described above was annealed to the synthetic oligonucleotide GGGCTTTGCACCTGGCAG. This oligonucleotide anneals to the FIBAC coding region across the HgiAI site with a single mismatch. The resultant DNA was then incubated with the Klenow fragment of E_. coli DNA polymerase, T4 DNA ligase and a mixture of all four deoxy-nucleotidetriphosphates. The σovalently-closed, double-stranded phage DNA thus obtained was used to transfect E_. coli strain JM107. Plaques were assayed for the presence of the mutant sequence by their hy¬ bridization to the mutagenic oligonucleotide shown above at 58°C in 6x SSC. The selected clone had the leu codon CTT replacing CTG at amino acid position 173. The coding region from this clone was excised as a BamHI to Hindlll fragment and ligated into a similarly-digested pUC8. The resulting plasmid, pFib55, has all of the features of pFib51 as well as a more easily mobilized FIBAC coding region. C. Expression Vector pFib56 Alternate methods of translational coupling to beta- galactosidase or any E_. coli protein can be similarly con¬ structed. For one embodiment, a clone has been designed which is similar from a regulation of expression point of view to plasmid pFibδl (i.e., FIBAC translationally coupled to lacZ in pUC8), but which uses an alternate translational coupler. To create pFib56, the following pieces of DNA were synthesized: EcoRI end HgiAI end 5' A A T T C C A A G G A G-A A A T A A A T G T G C A 3' HgiAI end EcoRI end 5' C A T T T A T T T C T C C T T G G 3' This double-stranded EcoRl/HgiAI fragment was then combined with the HgiAl/Hindlll FIBAC coding sequence and plasmid pUC8 that had been digested with EcoRI and Hindlll and ligated. The resulting plasmid has been called pFib56. When this plasmid is transformed into 12. coli strain JM107, the strain, JM107/pFib56, can be in¬ duced to express even more methionyl FIBAC than. JM107/pFib51 or JM107/pFib55. From this, it has been concluded that the transla¬ tional coupler in pFib56 is more efficient than that in pFib51. D. Expression Vectors pFiblO and pFibll To direct the expressed FIBAC to the periplasmic space - of E. coli, a leader peptide is added to the amino terminus of FIBAC. The leader peptide will effect the transport of the fu¬ sion protein out of the inner cell membrane. Cellular processing removes the signal peptide and yields the mature form of FIBAC. Two signal sequences have been separately fused to FIBAC for this purpose. They are the leader peptides of E. coli ompA and phoS gene products. Both ompA^-FIBAC and phoS -FIBAC fusion proteins contain signals to direct them to be located in the periplasm of E. coli and to allow proteolytic processing of the fusion to ompA or phoS leader fragments and native FIBAC. Plasmid pFiblO is a derivative of pUC8 into which the coding sequence for the ompA. -FIBAC fusion protein has been in¬ serted. In addition, some 5' nontranslated sequences from the ompA gene are included. Transcription of this plasmid is directed by the lac promoter/operator of pUC8. Translation is initiated at the methionine codon beginning the ompA leader se¬ quence and uses the Shine-Dalgarno sequence found in the ompA gene. The plasmid was constructed by ligating the FIBAC coding sequence contained on a HgiAI/Hindlll fragment of pFib55 together with synthetic oligonucleotides encoding the ompA leader peptide and with EcoRI/Hindlll-digested pUC8. The coding strand of the synthesized oligonucleotide is: omp j ^ EcoRI end 5' A A T T C G A T A T C T C G T T G G A G A T A T T C A T G A C G T A T T T T G G A T G A T A A C G A G G C G C A A A A A A T Pvul G A A A A A G A C A G C T A T C G C G A T C G C A G T G G C A C T G G C T G G T T T C G C T A C C G T A G C G C A G G C C T • G C A 3' HgiAI end The synthesis was accomplished as four oligonucleo¬ tides, two for each of the strands. Together, the double- stranded DNA features: (a) An EcoRI cohesive end at the 5' end and a HgiAI cohesive end at the 3' end of the coding strands; (b) An open reading frame encoding the leader peptide of the ompA gene product which is in frame with the FIBAC gene when ligated at the HgiAI site; (c) Non-coding sequences 5' to the translated portion which contain the ribosome binding site normally found in the ompA gene; and (d) An internal, unique Pvul site. Plasmid pFibll is a derivative of plasmid pKK223-3 and is identical to pFiblO except that its pUC8 portion has been re¬ placed by the 4550 bp EcoRl/Hindlll fragment of plasmid pKK223-3. In this construct, transcription is directed and regulated by the hybrid tac promoter/operator. Additionally, this plasmid con¬ tains a transcriptional terminator which may stabilize the plasmid in a high expression system. E. Expression Vector pFib!3 In plasmid pFibl3, the 5' non-coding region of the ompA- sequence has been eliminated and the omp .. -FIBAC fusion gene is translationally coupled directly to the N-terminal por¬ tion of the lacZ gene as it appears in plasmid pUC8. This has been accomplished by ligating the EcoRl/PvuI (3200 bp) fragment of plasmid pFiblO to a synthetic oligonucleotide shown here. EcoRI end 5' A A T T C C A A G G A G A A A T A A A T G A A A A A G A C A G C T A T C G C G A T 3' Pvul end Pvul end 5' C G C G A T A G C T G T C T T T T T C A T T T A T T T C T C C T T G G 3' EcoRI end F. Expression Vector pFib31 The pho.S gene of 13. coli codes for the phosphate bind¬ ing protein -and has been described and sequenced by Surin, B.D. et al . , in J. Bacterioi. 157:772-778 (1984), specifically incor¬ porated herein by reference. This protein is periplasmic, with a 25-amino-acid leader sequence that directs it to that compart¬ ment. The leader sequence is proteolytically removed during the translation process to leave only mature phoS protein in the periplasm. We have synthesized the phoS leader sequence as two double-stranded DNA fragments with EcoRI and HgiAI ends as shown: EcoRl/Clal EcoRI end 5' A A T T C A T G A A A G T T A T G C G T A C C A C C G T C G C A A C T G T T G T C G C C G C G A C C T T A T 3' Clal end Clal end 5' C G A T A A G G T C G C G G C G A C A A C A G T T G C G A C G G T G G T A C G C A T A A C T T T C A T G 3' EcoRI end Clal /HgiAI Clal end HgiAI end 5' C G A T G A G T G C T T T C T C T G T G T T T G C G T G C A 3' HgiAI end ClaAI end 5' C G C A A A C A C A G A G A A A G C A C T C A T 3' These fragments were ligated together at a Clal site internal to the phoS leader. These fragments were simultaneously combined with the HgiAI/HindiII FIBAC coding fragment described above and plasmid pKK223-3 that had been digested with EcoRI and Hindlll. The resulting plasmid has been called pFib31. EXAMPLE 9 EXPRESSION OF THE FIBAC GENE IN E. COLI Three methods have been employed to qualitatively de¬ termine the amount and form of FIBAC produced by E_. coli cells harboring the plasmids described above. They are: (1) specific reaction of FIBAC antibody to E_. coli proteins produced following induction of the FIBAC gene resolved by polyacrylamide-SDS- electrophoresis and subsequently bound to nitrocellulose paper (western blotting) ; (2) labeling of E_. coli proteins with 35S-cysteine, -_*_ c .__ S-methionine, or SO-7 following induction of the FIBAC gene; and (3) inspection of polyacrylamide SDS gels containing E_. coli proteins and FIBAC without antibody cou¬ pling or radioactive-labeling. These methods have allowed not only comparison of the amounts of FIBAC produced by each strain, but also purification of the FIBAC following expression without the need for functional metalloproteinase inhibition. All of the plasmids discussed in Example 8 have been expressed in the background of E_. coli strain JM107. The expression of FIBAC in E_. coli has so far been greater in those systems designed to transport the protein out¬ side of the inner cell membrane. This Is possibly due to degra¬ dation of the expressed protein in the cytoplasm. Processing ompa τ J_ι-FIBAC fusion protein to yield the ma- ture form of FIBAC has been found to be partially dependent on the phase of growth of the cells. Cells induced with IPTG in early log phase of growth accumulate a mixture of processed and unprocessed FIBAC, while cell cultures induced in late log phase accumulate only processed FIBAC. Strains expressing the phoS^.- FIBAC fusion appear to process the protein completely independent of growth phase. All of the expression vectors described above in Exam¬ ple 8 have ampicillin resistance as the selectable marker. For the purposes of production, it might be preferable to have a tetracycline resistance marker. One plasmid generally useful as an expression vector has been constructed with a tetracycline re¬ sistance marker. This plasmid is a derivative of pKK223-3 in which the truncated tetracycline resistance gene has been re¬ placed with fully functional tet r gene adapted from pBR322. EXAMPLE 10 PURIFICATION OF FIBAC EXPRESSED IN E. COLT The recombinant human colleagenase inhibitor (FIBAC) has been purified from E_. coli strain JM107 transformed with plasmid pFibll. In this strain, JM107/pFibll, FIBAC can be made to accumulate as an insoluble aggregate. In this example, the conditions for growth of the cells, induction of FIBAC gene ex¬ pression, cell harvesting, and purification of FIBAC from the in¬ soluble fraction of a total cell lysate are described. The same protocol may also be used to substantially enrich Fibac from the soluble fraction of total cell lysate. A. Insoluble Fraction Luria broth containing ampicillin at a concentration of 100 ug/ml was innoculated with an overnight culture of JM107/pFibll to an initial O D 600 of 0.15-0.20. The shake flask cell culture was allowed to grow at 37°C to an O*Dg 00 of 1.5, at which time the culture medium was supplemented with IPTG to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. Incubation at 37°C was then con¬ tinued for 2.5 to 3 hours. The cell culture was rapidly cooled to 4°C in an ice bath and the cells harvested by centrifugation. A one-liter culture grown as described above yielded on the average 3 gr of cells (wet weight) . The cells were washed once in cold lysis buffer (50 mM MES, pH 6.0, 4 mM EDTA) and then resuspended in the lysis buffer to a final concentration of 0.26 g cells (wet weight) /ml. The cell suspension was frozen at -70"C until further processing. Total cell lysate was prepared by passing the cell sus¬ pension two times through a French pressure cell (SLM-Aminco model #FA-079 fitted with piston #FA-073 and operated at 20,000 psti, SLM Instruments, Inc., Urbana, Illinois) . The resultant cell lysate was incubated with 10 ug of DNase i/gr of cells (wet weight) for 2-3 hours on ice. The cell lysate was then divided into small aliquots and stored frozen at -70°C until further pro¬ cessing. A cell lysate supernatant and cell lysate pellet frac¬ tion were obtained by centrifugation of a 5 ml portion of cell lysate for 30 minutes at 4°C in an Eppendorf micro centrifuge. The resultant pellet was washed twice with 3 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 4 mM EDTA, 50 mM DTT. The supernatants from these washes were pooled and saved for further analysis. The washed pellet was then solubilized by resuspension in 3 ml of 50 mM MES, pH 6.0, 4 mM EDTA, 50 mM DTT, 10 M urea, and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. Should protein carbamylation occur due to urea solubilization the side reaction could be quenched by the addition of a one hundred fold excess of a suit¬ able nucleophile over total protein amino groups. The resultant solution was clarified by centrifugation for 15 minutes at 4°C in an Eppendorf micro centrifuge. The supernatant contained essen¬ tially all of the protein from the solubilization procedure and was saved for further analysis. The remaining small pellet con¬ sisted mostly of cell wall debris and few proteins (none of which were FIBAC) . This was discarded. The identification of FIBAC in the various fractions prepared as described above was accomplished by SDS-PAGE and probing of western blots with anti-FIBAC antibodies. SDS-gel analysis of total cell lysate protein obtained from IPTG-induced JM107/pFibll shows the presence of a protein band of approxi¬ mately 20,000 dalton apparent molecular mass that is absent in the gel pattern from a cell lysate of non-included JM107/pFibll. The 20,000 Da protein and a faster migrating band, presumably a degradation product of FIBAC, react with anti-FIBAC antibodies in the western blot analysis. The IPTG induction-dependent presence of this protein, the molecular weight, and the reactivity with anti-FIBAC antibodies suggest that the protein represents the ex¬ pressed recombinant FIBAC. Analysis of the cell lysate supernatant fraction obtained from IPTG-induced JM107/pFibll and the cell lysate pellet wash revealed little FIBAC. The bulk of the FIBAC was found, however, in the urea-DTT solubilized cell lysate pellet fraction. This was interpreted to mean that, upon IPTG induction, the FIBAC accumulates an insoluble fraction and can be isolated in a substantially purified form from the washed cell lysate pellet. The urea-DTT solubilized cell lysate pellet was used as the starting material for the CM-chromatography. A 1.2 ml ali¬ quot of solubilized cell lysate pellet (16 mg protein) was di¬ luted to 25 ml with cold ' CM-buffer (50 mM MES, pH 6.0, 6 M urea, 14 mM 2-ME) . The sample was then applied to a carboxymethyl cel¬ lulose column (25x130 mm) previously equilibrated with CM-buffer at 4°C. After sample application, the column was washed with CM-buffer until the __ n returned to baseline. Adsorbed protein was eluted with a linear sodium chloride gradient (0-200 mM) in CM-buffer. Total gradient volume was 400 ml, flow rate was 26 ml/hr, and 5 ml fractions were collected. The "flow-through" fraction (CM-FT) and the peak fractions 58-61 were pooled and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The electrophoretic and immunological analysis of these fractions revealed that the recombinant FIBAC, including some degraded FIBAC, eluted at approximately 120 mM NaCl without any other detectable proteins. Under the chromatographic conditions employed, most non-FIBAC proteins did not adsorb to the CM-column and were found in the "flow-through" fraction. The amount of CM-purified FIBAC obtained in this proce¬ dure was estimated to represent 1.3% of the total cell protein. Bradford protein assays were used for quantitation throughout the isolation and purification procedure. Two ml (100 ug) of purified FIBAC in 50 mM MES, 6 M urea, 14 mM 2-mercaptoethanol were concentrated to 200 ul by Centricon centrifugation and adjusted to pH 8.5 by addition of 2 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.5 to a final Tris concentration of 0.5 M. The cysteine residues of FIBAC were then carboxymethylated using 3H-iodoacetic acid. The alkylation reaction mixture was desalted by reverse phase HPLC. The modified FIBAC eluted at 30% acetonitrile and was collected for further analysis. An aliquot of the modified FIBAC isolated from the HPLC was subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis. Comparison of the CM-purified FIBAC that was used for the carboxymethylation (starting material) and the FIBAC after alkylation and HPLC desalting showed that the modified FIBAC migrated slightly slower in the SDS gel than the non- modified FIBAC. This is not an unusual observation, particularly in view of the substantial number of modified cysteines present in FIBAC. The carboxymethylated FIBAC was then applied to an Applied Biosystems (model 470A) gas-phase protein sequencer (Fos¬ ter City, CA) for automatic Edman degredation, and the amino acid sequence for the first- 24 residues was identified. The sequencing data for the first 6 cycles of the Edman degradation are shown in the table below. The data clearly establish that the N-terminal amino acid sequence of the purified FIBAC (C-T-V-P-P... ) is identical to that previously determined for na¬ tive FIBAC. It is therefore concluded that pFibll properly pro¬ cesses the recombinant FIBAC by cleaving the ompA-FIBAC fusion protein at its ala-cys junction to produce the mature form of the FIBAC protein. N-TERMINAL AMINO ACID SEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF PURIFIED RECOMBINANT FIBAC 3 (cysteine residues were labeled with H-iodoacetic acid prior to sequencing of the protein) CYCLE 3H-CPM PTH-AA IDENTIFICATION 1 11470 CYS 2 385 THR 3 12690 CYS 4 339 VAL 5 145 PRO 6 255 PRO B. Soluble Fraction Because of the additional contaminants in the starting material, the procedure discussed herein does not initially result in a homogeneous preparation of FIBAC. However, the pro¬ cedure does provide sufficient purification to allow refolding of FIBAC to its native conformation. Subsequent purification steps may then be used to complete the isolation procedure. In this example, the cell growth, induction, harvest¬ ing, and preparation of a total cell lysate were as in the previ¬ ous example. In order to demonstrate the ability of the present procedure to purify FIBAC from any fraction of the cell lysate, the original centrifugal fractionation of the homogenate was omitted. Instead, the total cell lysate was made to 10 M urea, 4 mM EDTA, 50 mM DTT, 50 mM MES, pH 6.0 and incubated at 22 β C for 15 minutes. The solution was then centrifuged for 15 minutes in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge at 4°C. The pellet was discarded and the supernatant diluted with CM-buffer (50 mM MES, pH 6.0, 6 M urea, 14 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) and chromatographiσally frac¬ tionated on σarboxymethyl cellulose as in the previous example. FIBAC eluted at approximately 120 mM salt along with some de¬ graded FIBAC and several immunologically non-related contaminants. Estimation of the purity of FIBAC by SDS-PAGE analysis showed it to be greater than 50 percent of the total protein in this fraction. At this level of purity, it is possi¬ ble to refold the FIBAC to its native conformation using the refolding procedure below. The refolded FIBAC is fully function¬ al as a metalloprotease inhibitor and may be further purified by anion exchange chromatography. Anion exchange chromatography was effected on a column 10x100 mm of Whatman DE-52 (Whatman Inc., Clifton, New Jersey) equilibrated in 600 mM urea, 50 mM Tris, pH 9.6. The solution containing the impure, refolded FIBAC was titrated to a pH of 9.6 by drop-wise addition of 5 N NaOH and applied to the DEAE cellu¬ lose. Analysis of the flow-through fraction demonstrated that the FIBAC was not retained. The immunologically non-related contaminants bound to the matrix and were thereby removed from the solution. The flow-through fractions can be concentrated on a CM-cellulose column as shown below. The flow-through fraction from the anion exchange col¬ umn was titrated to pH 7.5 by the addition of 5 N HGI. This so¬ lution was applied to a CM-cellulose column (25x130 mm) previous¬ ly equilibrated with 600 mM urea and 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5. The column was washed with this same buffer until no protein could be spectrally observed to elute. The FIBAC was then eluted with the above buffer made to 250 mM in NaCL. The protein peak was pooled and dialyzed to equilibrium against 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5. Electrophoretic, immunological, and functional assays of the resulting FIBAC demonstrate an active, refolded col¬ lagenase inhibitor of greater than 90% purity. The only de¬ tectable contaminant is a FIBAC degradation product as in the pu¬ rification from the cell lysate pellet. Because of the identical amino terminal sequence of this contaminant and its apparent mo¬ lecular mass, it has been concluded that a proteolytic clip has been made close to the carboxy terminus. This material can be removed in further purification steps (e.g., higher resolution ion exchange chromatography or affinity chromatography of the refolded FIBAC) . EXAMPLE 11 CONSTRUCTION OF A YEAST FIBAC EXPRESSION CLONE Another organism in which gene expression and protein export vectors have been constructed is the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The yeast alpha-factor is a mating hormone which is produced intracellularly and exported to the growth medium. A single peptide sequence directs this transport. The FIBAC coding sequence has been cloned into a yeast expression vector to create a fusion of the yeast alpha-factor leader sequence to FIBAC. A construct was first made as a derivative of pGS385. Plasmid pGS385 has the following features: (a) It contains portions of the yeast alpha-factor gene including the promoter, leader peptide, polyadenylation signal, and transcriptional termi¬ nation signals; (b) The portion of the alpha-factor gene between the two most distant Hindlll sites has been deleted, creating a unique Hindlll site; (c) It contains a unique Sail site 3' to the Hindlll site; and (d) It has the pBR322 origin of replication and ampicillin resistance gene to allow replication and selection in E_. coli. The plasmid pGS385 was digested with Hindlll and Sail. The Hindlll site defines the carboxy terminus of the alpha-factor leader sequence. The synthetic octanucleotide 5 '-AGCTTGCA-3 ' was used to bridge the alpha-factor C-terminus to the N-terminus of FIBAC. The alpha-factor transcription-translation sequences drive gene expression in this vector. The entire alpha-factor- FIBAC fusion was then removed by digestion with EcoRI and in¬ serted into plasmid YiP5, a derivative of plasmid * pBR322, con¬ tains the yeast ura3 gene. This plasmid is suitable for use as an expression vector following digestion at a unique StuI site in ura3 and transformation into S_. cerevisiae to direct integration of the entire plasmid into the chromosomal ura3 locus. Such integrants of an alpha-FIBAC fusion derivative of YiP5 have been obtained and here produced and secreted immunoreactive material as determined by colony screening techniques. EXAMPLE 12 EXPRESSION OF RECOMBINANT FIBAC IN ANIMAL CELLS Two expression systems for the production of FIBAC in animal cells are proposed. The first incorporates the SV40 late promoter to direct transcription in COS-l cells . This expression system is primarily useful for studying the expression, protein synthesis, post-translational modification, and transport of FIBAC in COS-l cells. Although the system is rapid and conve¬ nient, it is limited to the COS-l monkey cell line. The SV40 ex¬ pression plasmid will be a derivative of pJC119, the construction of which is described in detail by Sprague, J., Condra, J.H., Arnheiter, H. and Lazzarini, R.A. , in J. Virol. 45:773-781 (1983), specifically incorporated herein by reference. The com¬ plete FIBAC coding region, including the naturally-occurring sig¬ nal sequence, has been assembled from the partial cDNA clones. The Ncol site coinciding with the initiator methionine for the leader peptide will be linked via a short synthetic oligonucleotide to the unique Xhol site in pJC119. The entire FIBAC coding region and 3 ' nontranslated sequences are inserted at this site where transcription is directed by the SV40 late promoter. The plasmid would thus contain SV40 origin of replica¬ tion, the pBR322 origin of replication and the ampicillin resis¬ tance selectable marker. The second system would be preferred for production of FIBAC in animal cells because it will result in the stable and continuous expression of FIBAC from a human cell line. This vector will be a derivative of pBPV52-l, described by Florkiewicz, R.Z., Smith, A., Bergmann, J.E., and Rose, J.K. in Cell Biol. ST7:1381-1388 (1983), specifically incorporated herein by reference. This plasmid features the bovine papilloma virus origin of replication, pBR322 origin of replication, beta- lactamase gene, and the 69% transforming fragment of BPV DNA. The SV40 origin of replication and the SV40 early promoter will be cloned into this plasmid. Sequences from pBR322 that inter¬ fere with the replication of the vector in human cells will be excluded. As with the previous plasmid, the entire coding por¬ tion of the FIBAC cDNA will be inserted so as to direct its tran¬ scription by the SV40 early promoter. It is expected that purification of FIBAC from the me¬ dium following expression and secretion from these cells will be possible essentially as described previously in Examples 4 and 5. EXAMPLE 13 REFOLDING FIBAC Two assays have been used to monitor the refolding of FIBAC. Both assays measure the appearance of the functional capacity of FIBAC as its native structure. The first assay is an inhibition assay which measures the inhibitory effect of the sample on the ability of human fibroblast collagenase to degrade 14 C-labeled collagen. The second assay is a modified ELISA which measures the binding of the refolded FIBAC to human collagenase. The collagenase binding ELISA is the primary assay by which FIBAC activity was detected. Here, collagenase is coated overnight at 4°C in 96-well Immulon II plates (1.0 ug/ml in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.2, 5 mM CaCl^; 100 ul per well). After the wells are blocked for 45 minutes with 150 ul/well of 3% BSA in washing buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mM CaCl 2 , 0.02% Tween-20), varying dilutions of FIBAC standards or unknown samples diluted in blocking buffer are pipetted into the, wells (100 ul/well). Fol¬ lowing a 45-minute incubation period (37°C), the wells are washed three times with washing buffer. Affinity-purified rabbit and anti-FIBAC is added to the wells (diluted 1/100, 100 ul/well) and incubated at 37°C for 45 minutes. The wells are again washed and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma, di¬ luted 1/1000 in washing buffer) is then added to the wells (100 ul/well). Following a one-hour incubation period at 37°C, the wells are washed a last time and alkaline phosphatase sub¬ strate (Sigma #104-105, 1 mg/ml in 10% diethanolamine, 100 mM IΛgClr. , pH 9.8) is added to the wells. Color development is moni¬ tored at 495 nm using a Titertek Multiskan MC ELISA reader (Flow Laboratories). Native FIBAC serves as a standard curve against which unknown samples may be quantitated. In the collagenase inhi .bi.ti.on assay, 14C-labeled guinea pig skin collagen pellets (25 ul/pellet = 2100 cpm) is digested with 50 microliters of trypsin-activated collagenase (approxi¬ mately 75 ug/ml in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM CaCl ? ) , which re- leases 14C into soluti.on. After incubating the pellets for 1-3 hours (depending on the rate of digestion) , the reaction is stopped by adding 100 ul of Tris buffer and centrifuging for 10 minutes at 10,000 rp . The supernatant is then pipetted into scintillation vials containing 3 mis of scintillation fluid and counted. Preincubation of the collagenase with 50 ul of varying dilutions of standard or purified FIBAC prior to adding the solu¬ tion to the collagen pellet should inhibit digestions of the col- 14 lagen and the subsequent release of C into solution. The quantitation of inhibitory activity of an unknown sample depends on the amount of active collagenase used in the assay. From this, the activity of the unknown sample may be calculated by assuming a 1:1 molar ratio between inhibitor and enzyme. Using these assays, the efficiency of the refolding process with respect to protein concentration, oxidized gluthathione concentration, pH, and temperature has been exam¬ ined. While all combinations of these parameters have not been exhaustively examined, a procedure has been developed which allows efficient renaturation. The refolding of FIBAC depends greatly on the concen¬ tration of FIBAC at which refolding is performed. Under oxidizing conditions, dilute solutions prevent the formation of interchain disulfides, which eventually lead to the precipitation of aggregates. Purified recombinant FIBAC can be refolded and remains soluble with 100% recovery of protein by following the protocol described below: (1) Dilute, purified FIBAC (less than 300 ug/ml) in 6 M urea, 50 MES, pH 6.0, 14 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, is incubated in the presence of 70 M oxidized glutathione. (2) After a 10-minute incubation period at room tem¬ perature, the sample is diluted ten-fold with 50 mM Tris, pH 9.0. (3) The sample is then incubated overnight at 4°C. SDS-PAGE analysis of this reactivated material indi¬ cates the presence of both intact and degraded FIBAC. The de¬ graded FIBAC is carried through from the purification procedure and does not appear to degrate further during the reactivation procedure. This solubilized FIBAC has been demonstrated to have both collagenase binding activity (ELISA) and collagenase inhib¬ itory activity. The amount of activity relative to the amount of protein appears to be greater than 90% as determined by the col¬ lagenase inhibition assay. This number was derived from calcula¬ tions based on the estimated amount of collagenase in the assay. Although this is an estimate, it is not believed it to be off by more than 50%. Binding activity as measured against the FIBAC standard has enabled us to monitor the relative reactivation of different samples. The refolding process has also been shown to work on 50% pure FIBAC preparations. The nature and amount of contaminating protein that can be tolerated is still uncertain, however, some active FIBAC has been detected in total cell lysates without purification demonstrating that at least some yields are obtainable at less than 5% purity. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the processes and products of the present invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended, claims and their equivalence.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A portable DNA sequence comprising a series of nucleotides capable of directing intracellular production of metalloproteinase inhibitors. 2. The portable DNA sequence of claim 1 wherein said sequence is capable of directing intracellular production of col¬ lagenase inhibitors. 3. The portable DNA sequence of claim 1 wherein said nucleotide sequence is: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GTTGTTGCTG TGGCTGATAG CCCCAGCAGG GCCTGCACCT GTGTCCCACC CCACCCACAG 70 80 90 100 110 120 ACGGCCTTCT GCAATTCCGA CCTCGTCATC AGGGCCAAGT TCGTGGGGAC ACCAGAAGTC 130 140 150 160 170 180 AACCAGACCA CCTTATACCA GCGTTATGAG ATCAAGATGA CCAAGATGTA TAAAGGGTTC 190 ' 200 210 220 230 240 CAAGCCTTAG GGGATGCCGC TGACATCCGG TTCGTCTACA CCCCCGCCAT GGAGAGTGTC 250 260 270 280 290 300 TGCGGATACT TCCACAGGTC CCACAACCGC AGCGAGGAGT TTCTCATTGC TGGAAAACTG 310 320 330 340 350 360 CAGGATGGAC TCTTGCACAT CACTACCTGC AGTTTCGTGG CTCCCTGGAA CAGCCTGAGC 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTAGCTCAGC GCCGGGGCTT CACCAAGACC TACACTGTTG GCTGTGAGGA ATGCACAGTG 430 440 450 460 470 480 TTTCCCTGTT TATCCATCCC CTGCAAACTG CAGAGTGGCA CTCATTGCTT GTGGACGGAC 490 500 510 520 530 540 CAGCTCCTCC AAGGCTCTGA AAAGGGCTTC CAGTCCCGTC ACCTTGCCTG CCTGCCTCGG 550 560 570 580 590 600 GAGCCAGGGC TGTGCACCTG GCAGTCCCTG CGGTCCCAGA TAGCCTGAAT CCTGCCCGGA 610 620 630 640 650 660 GTGGAAGCTG AAGCCTGCAC AGTGTCCACC CTGTTCCCAC TCCCATCTTT CTTCCGGACA 670 680 690 700 ATGAAATAAA GAGTTACCAC CCAGCAAAAA AAAAAAGGAA TTC 4. The portable DNA sequence of claim 2 wherein said sequence is capable of directing intracellular production of a collagenase inhibitor biologically equivalent to that isolable from human skin fibroblasts . 5. A recombinant-DNA cloning vector comprising a nucleotide sequence capable of directing intracellular production of metalloproteinanse inhibitors. 6. The vector of claim 5 wherein said vector comprises a nucleotide sequence containing at least a portion of the fol¬ lowing nucleotides: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GTTGTTGCTG TGGCTGATAG CCCCAGCAGG GCCTGCACCT GTGTCCCACC CCACCCACAG 70 80 . . 90 100 110 120 ACGGCCTTCT GCAATTCCGA CCTCGTCATC AGGGCCAAGT TCGTGGGGAC ACCAGAAGTC 130 140 150 160 170 180 AACCAGACCA CCTTATACCA GCGTTATGAG ATCAAGATGA CCAAGATGTA TAAAGGGTTC 190 200 210 220 230 240 CAAGCCTTAG GGGATGCCGC TGACATCCGG TTCGTCTACA CCCCCGCCAT GGAGAGTGTC 250 260 270 280 290 300 TGCGGATACT TCCACAGGTC CCACAACCGC AGCGAGGAGT TTCTCATTGC TGGAAAACTG 310 320 330 340 350 360 CAGGATGGAC TCTTGCACAT CACTACCTGC AGTTTCGTGG CTCCCTGGAA CAGCCTGAGC 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTAGCTCAGC GCCGGGGCTT CACCAAGACC TACACTGTTG GCTGTGAGGA ATGCACAGTG 430 440 450 460 470 480 TTTCCCTGTT TATCCATCCC CTGCAAACTG CAGAGTGGCA CTCATTGCTT GTGGACGGAC 490 500 510 520 530 540 CAGCTCCTCC AAGGCTCTGA AAAGGGCTTC CAGTCCCGTC ACCTTGCCTG CCTGCCTCGG 550 560 570 580 590 600 GAGCCAGGGC TGTGCACCTG GCAGTCCCTG CGGTCCCAGA TAGCCTGAAT CCTGCCCGGA 610 620 630 640 650 660 GTGGAAGCTG AAGCCTGCAC AGTGTCCACC CTGTTCCCAC TCCCATCTTT CTTCCGGACA 670 680 690 700 ATGAAATAAA GAGTTACCAC CCAGCAAAAA AAAAAAGGAA TTC 7. The vector pUC9-F5/237Pl0. 8. A recombinant-DNA method for microbial production of a metalloproteinase inhibitor comprising: (a) preparation of a portable DNA sequence capable of directing a host microorganism to produce a pro¬ tein having metalloproteinase inhibitor activity; (b) cloning the portable DNA sequence into a vector capable of being transferred into and replicating in a host microorganism, such vector containing operational elements for the portable DNA se¬ quence; (c) transferring the vector containing the portable DNA sequence and operational elements into a host microorganism capable of expressing the metallo¬ proteinase inhibitor protein; (d) culturing the host microorganism under conditions appropriate for amplification of the vector and expression of the inhibitor; and (e) in either order: (i) harvesting the inhibitor; and (ii) causing the inhibitor to assume an active, tertiary structure whereby it possesses metalloproteinase inhibitor activity. 9. The method of claim 8 wherein said metallopro¬ teinase inhibitor is collagenase inhibitor. 10. The method of claim 8 wherein said portable DNA sequence contains a portion of the following sequence: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GTTGTTGCTG TGGCTGATAG CCCCAGCAGG GCCTGCACCT GTGTCCCACC CCACCCACAG 70 80 90 100 110 120 ACGGCCTTCT GCAATTCCGA CCTCGTCATC AGGGCCAAGT TCGTGGGGAC ACCAGAAGTC 130 140 150 160 170 180 AACCAGACCA CCTTATACCA GCGTTATGAG ATCAAGATGA CCAAGATGTA TAAAGGGTTC 190 200 210 220 230 240 CAAGCCTTAG GGGATGCCGC TGACATCCGG TTCGTCTACA CCCCCGCCAT GGAGAGTGTC 250 260 270 280 290 300 TGCGGATACT TCCACAGGTC CCACAACCGC AGCGAGGAGT TTCTCATTGC TGGAAAACTG 310 320 330 340 350 360 CAGGATGGAC TCTTGCACAT CACTACCTGC AGTTTCGTGG CTCCCTGGAA CAGCCTGAGC 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTAGCTCAGC GCCGGGGCTT. CACCAAGACC TACACTGTTG GCTGTGAGGA ATGCACAGTG 430 440 450 460 470 480 TTTCCCTGTT TATCCATCCC CTGCAAACTG CAGAGTGGCA CTCATTGCTT GTGGACGGAC 490 500 510 520 530 540 CAGCTCCTCC AAGGCTCTGA AAAGGGCTTC CAGTCCCGTC ACCTTGCCTG CCTGCCTCGG 550 560 570 580 590 600 GAGCCAGGGC TGTGCACCTG GCAGTCCCTG CGGTCCCAGA TAGCCTGAAT CCTGCCCGGA 610 620 630 640 650 660 GTGGAAGCTG AAGCCTGCAC AGTGTCCACC CTGTTCCCAC TCCCATCTTT CTTCCGGACA 670 680 690 700 ATGAAATAAA GAGTTACCAC CCAGCAAAAA AAAAAAGGAA TTC 11. The method of claim 8 wherein said vector contain¬ ing said portable DNA sequence is pUC9-F5/237P10. 12. The method of claim 8 wherein said host microorga¬ nism is a bacterium. 13. The method of claim 12 wherein said bacterium is a member of the genus Bacillus. 14. The method of claim 13 wherein said bacterium is Bacillus subtilis. 15. The method of claim 12 wherein said bacterium is Escherichia coli. 16. The method of claim 12 wherein said bacterium is a member of the genus Pseudomonas. 17. The method of claim 16 wherein said bacterium is Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 18. The method of claim 8 wherein said host microorga¬ nism is a yeast. 19. The method of claim 8 wherein said yeast is Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 20. The method of claim 8 wherein said inhibitor is harvested prior to being caused to assume said active, tertiary structure. 21. The method of claim 8 wherein said inhibitor is caused to assume said active, tertiary structure prior to being harvested. 22. A metalloproteinase inhibitor which is biologi¬ cally equivalent to the collagenase inhibitor isolable from human skin fibroblasts produced by the method of claim 8. 23. The microorganism C600/pUC9-F5/237P10 having ATCC Accession No. 53003. 24. The portable DNA sequence of claim 1 wherein said nucleotide sequence is: 10 20 30 40 50 60 GGCCATCGCC GCAGATCCAG CGCCCAGAGA GACACCAGAG AACCCACCAT GGCCCCCTTT 70 80 90 100 110 120 GACCCCTGGC TTCTGCATCC TGTTGTTGCT GTGGCTGATA GCCCCAGCAG GGCCTGCACC 130 140 150 160 170 180 TGTGTCCCAC CCCACCCACA GACGGCCTTC TGCAATTCCG ACCTCGTCAT CAGGGCCAAG 190 200 210 220 230 240 TTCGTGGGGA CACCAGAAGT CAACCAGACC ACCTTATACC AGCGTTATGA GATCAAGATG 250 260 270 280 290 300 ACCAAGATGT ATAAAGGGTT CCAAGCCTTA GGGGATGCCG CTGACATCCG GTTCGTCTAC 310 320 330 340 350 360 ACCCCCGCCA TGGAGAGTGT CTGCGGATAC TTCCACAGGT CCCACAACCG CAGCGAGGAG 370 380 390 400 410 420 TTTCTCATTG CTGGAAAACT GCAGGATGGA CTCTTGCACA TCACTACCTG CAGTTTCGTG 430 440 450 460 470 480 GCTCCCTGGA ACAGCCTGAG CTTAGCTCAG CGCCGGGGCT TCACCAAGAC CTACACTGTT 490 500 510 520 530 540 GGCTGTGAGG AATGCACAGT GTTTCCCTGT TTATCCATCC CCTGCAAACT GCAGAGTGGC 550 560 570 580 590 600 ACTCATTGCT TGTGGACGGA CCAGCTCCTC CAAGGCTCTG AAAAGGGCTT CCAGTCCCGT 610 620 630 640 650 660 CACCTTGCCT GCCTGCCTCG GGAGCCAGGG CTGTGCACCT GGCAGTCCCT GCGGTCCCAG 670 680 690 700 710- 720 ATAGCCTGAA TCCTGCCCGG AGTGGAAGCT GAAGCCTGCA CAGTGTCCAC CCTGTTCCCA 730 740 750 760 770 780 CTCCCATCTT TCTTCCGGAC AATGAAATAA AGAGTTACCA CCCAGCAAAA AAAAAAAGGA 25. A recombinant-DNA method for the production of metalloproteinase inhibitor from animal cells, comprising: (a) Preparation of a portable DNA sequence capa¬ ble of directing a host animal cell to pro¬ duce a protein having metalloproteinase in¬ hibitor activity; (b) Cloning the portable DNA sequence into a vector capable of being transferred into and replicating in a host animal cell, said vector containing operational elements for the portable DNA sequence; (c) Transferring the vector containing the porta¬ ble DNA sequence and operational elements into a host animal cell capable of expressing the metalloproteinase inhibitor protein; (d) Culturing the host animal cells under condi¬ tions appropriate for expression of the in¬ hibitor; and (e) In either order; (i) Harvesting the inhibitor; and (ii) Causing the inhibitor to assume an active, teriary structure whereby it possesses metalloproteinase inhibitor activity. 26. The method of claim 25 wherein said vector is amplified in a microbial host prior to transfer into the animal cell host. 27. The method of claim 26 wherein said vector con¬ tains a portion of the following DNA sequence: 10 ' 20 30 40 50 60 GGCCATCGCC GCAGATCCAG CGCCCAGAGA GACACCAGAG AACCCACCAT GGCCCCCTTT 70 80 90 100 110 120 GAGCCCCTGG CTTCTGGCAT CCTGTTGTTG CTGTGGCTGA TAGCCCCCAG CAGGGCCTGC 130 140 150 160 170 180 ACCTGTGTCC CACCCCACCC ACAGACGGCC TTCTGCAATT CCGACCTCGT CATCAGGGCC 190 200 210 220 230 240 AAGTTCGTGG GGACACCAGA AGTCAACCAG ACCACCTTAT ACCAGCGTTA TGAGATCAAG 250 260 270 280 290 300 ATGACCAAGA TGTATAAAGG GTTCCAAGCC TTAGGGGATG CCGCTGACAT CCGGTTCGTC 310 320 330 340 350 360 TACACCCCCG CCATGGAGAG TGTCTGCGGA TACTTCCACA GGTCCCACAA CCGCAGCGAG 370 380 390 400 410 420 GAGTTTCTCA TTGCTGGAAA ACTGCAGGAT GGACTCTTGC ACATCACTAC CTGCAGTTTC 430 440 450 460 470 480 GTGGCTCCCT GGAACAGCCT GAGCTTAGCT CAGCGCCGGG GCTTCACCAA GACCTACACT 490 500 510 520 530 540 GTTGGCTGTG AGGAATGCAC AGTGTTTCCC TGTTTATCCA TCCCCTGCAA ACTGCAGAGT 550 560 570 580 590 600 GGCACTCATT GCTTGTGGAC GGACCAGCTC CTCCAAGGCT CTGAAAAGGG CTTCCAGTCC 610 620 630 640 650 660 CGTCACCTTG CCTGCCTGCC TCGGGAGCCA GGGCTGTGCA CCTGGCAGTC CCTGCGGTCC 670 680 690 700 710 720 CAGATAGCCT GAATCCTGCC CGGAGTGGAA GCTGAAGCCT GCACAGTGTC CACCCTGTTC 730 740 750 760 770 780 CCACTCCCAT CTTTCTTCCG GACAATGAAA TAAAGAGTTA CCACCCAGCA AAAAAAAAAA GGAATTC

Inventors: ANDERSON DAVID C, CARMICHAEL DAVID F, STRICKLIN GEORGE P, WELGUS HOWARD G, ANDERSON, DAVID, C., CARMICHAEL, DAVID, F., STRICKLIN, GEORGE, P., WELGUS, HOWARD, G.
Applicants: SYNERGEN BIOLOG INC, SYNERGEN BIOLOGICALS, INC.
Application year: 1986
Main classification: C12P21
IPC codes: A61K38, A61P43, C07H21, C07K14, C12N9, C12N15, C12P21, C12R1