SYNERGISTIC HERBICIDE COMBINATIONS AND METHOD OF APPLICATION

Abstract: A synergistic herbicidal composition comprising a mix­ ture of: (a) a herbicidally effective amount of 2-(2-chloro-4-­ methanesulfonylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione; and (b) a herbicidally effective amount of a compound selected from the group consisting of 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropyl­ amino)-s-triazine, 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid, and 2-­ chloro-N-isopropylacetanilide, and mixtures thereof; at a weight ratio of (a) to (b) of from about 0.1:1 to about 20:1.

Description: The protection of crops from weeds and other vegetation which inhibit crop growth is a constantly recurring problem in agriculture. To help combat this problem researchers in the field of synthetic chemistry have produced an extensive variety of chemicals and chemical formulations effective in the control of such unwanted growth. Chemical herbicides of many types have been disclosed in the literature and a large number are in commercial use. In some cases, active herbicides have been shown to be more effective in combination than when applied individually. The result is often termed "synergism," since the combination demonstrates a potency or activity level exceeding that which it would be expected to have, based on a knowledge of the individual potencies of the components. The present invention resides in the discovery that certain cyclohexanediones and other chemical compounds already known individually for their herbicidal potency, display this synergism when applied in combination. The compounds which can be combined to form the synergistic herbicidal compositions of this invention are already known in the art as herbicides. One such compound is 2-(2-chloro-4-methanesulfonylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione. This compound is disclosed in European Patent Publication No. 137,963, published 24-4-85. It is also disclosed and claimed in U.S. Application Serial No. 634,408. Another of the compounds used in the synergistic compositions of the invention is 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine, commonly known as Atrazine. It has now been discovered that synergism in the control of undesirable vegetation is exhibited by compositions comprising a mixture of the following components: (a) a synergistically effective amount of 2-(2-chloro-4-methanesulfonylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexandione; and (b) a synergistically effective amount of 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine. Another embodiment of this invention is a method of controlling undesirable weed pests, and this method comprises applying the synergistic compositions of the invention to the locus where control is desired. The terms "synergism" and "synergistic" are used herein to convey the result observed when a combination of herbicides demonstrates a potency in excess of that which the combination would be expected to produce on the basis of the potencies of each herbicide applied individually. The term "herbicide" is used herein to denote a compound which controls or modifies the growth of plants. Controlling or modifying effects include all deviations from natural development, for example: killing, retardation, leaf burn, dwarfing and the like. The term "plants" is used to include all post-emergent vegetation, ranging from seedlings to established vegetation. As previously mentioned, the synergistic compositions of this invention all employ chemical compounds previously known for their herbicidal activity. One of these compounds, 2-(2-chloro-4-methanesulfonylbenzol)-1,3-cyclohexanedione, is disclosed in European Patent Publication No. 137,963, published 24-4-85, and it is also disclosed and claimed in U.S. Application Serial No. 634,408. The other compound, 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine, commonly known as Atrazine, is commercially sold under various tradenames, and is described in the Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America , 5th Edition, 1983. These compounds are effectively used in the synergistic compositions of the invention at ratios of compound (a) to Compound (b) as set forth above, ranging from 0.01:1 to 20:1. Preferably, the ratio of Compound (a) to compound (b) is from 0.1:1 to 10:1. Herbicidal Test Data Synergism for the compositions of this invention was measured in accordance with the following test: Aluminum pans measuring 9 x 6 x 4 inches (cm) were filled with a sandy loam soil and 6 furrows were impressed across the width of each flat. A number of weed species were seeded into furrows and covered with soil. Along with the seed species were two corn hybrids which were inserted to determine the extend of damage, if any, upon plant species. The weed species were as follows: Abbreviation Common Name Scientific Name YNS yellow nutsedge Cyperus esculentus PNS purple nutsedge Cyperus rotundus RJG rhizome johnsongrass Sorghum halepense FP fall panicum Panicum dichotomiflorum WPM wild proso millet Panicum milaceum GG goosegrass Eleusine indica SC shattercane Sorghum bicolor YFT yellow foxtail Setaria lutescens GFT green foxtail Seteria viridis PW redroot pigweed Amaranthus retroflexus AMG annual morningglory Ipomoea purpurea SP sicklepod Cassia obtusifolia VL velvetleaf Abutilon theophrasti LCG large crabgrass Digitaria ischaemum JG johnsongrass Sorghum halepense The plant species were as follows: Chemical solutions, which in the case of pre-emergence testing were sprayed the same day of seeding, were prepared as follows: All compounds were of technical grade, except Prowl which was what is termed a 4E formulation, which means a 4 pound per gallon emulsion concentrate. All of the technical grade compounds were either applied singly, or applied in conjunction with the synergistic herbicidal compound, by diluting the technical grade compounds with acetone and water at 1:1 ratio water and applying at a spray volume of 25 gal/acre. The quantity of active ingredient for each compounds which was applied is indicated under the heading "Application Rate". In the case of post-emergent testing, the weed and plant species were allowed to sprout and application was made approximately 2 weeks after planting. The various rates of application are indicated in the tables under "Application Rate". Flats were then placed in a greenhouse, and watered by overhead sprinkling. Air temperatures ranged from 18°C to 27°C. Flats were kept moist during the course of each experiment. After treatment, each row of seedlings was visually rated for growth control due to all factors of injury. In pre-emergence testing the ratings were done 28 days after treatment. In post-emergent testing, the rating was done 21 days after treatment. Untreated flats of seedlings were used for comparison, zero percent injury or growth control is equivalent to growth in control flats. One hundred percent growth control is equivalent to complete kill. Herbicide interaction responses were evaluated by use of Limpel's formula (Limpel, L.E., et al., 1962, "Weed Control by Dimethyltetrachloroterephthalate Alone and in Certain Combinations," Proc. NEWCC , 16 :48-53): where E = expected response where X = observed (O) value or percent growth control when the herbicide is applied singly; and Y = observed (O) value or percent growth control when the second herbicide is applied singly. A response is synergistic when an observed value is greater than the calculated value, a synergistic response is understood to be one in which the interaction response is greater than the sum of responses from the individual chemical treatments. An antagonistic response is the opposite situation. In the tables which follows: E = expected activity O = observed activity R = result, i.e., additive (AD), antagonistic (A) or synergistic (S) Application rates for the composition of this invention will depend upon the weeds to be controlled and the degree of control desired. In general, the composition of this invention is most efficiently employed at a rate of 0.01 to 50 pounds per acre (0.011 to 56 kilograms per hectare) of the active ingredients, preferably 0.1 to 25 pounds per acre (0.11 to 28 kilograms per hectare). The composition of the present invention shows synergistic activity as herbicide in controlling the growth of undesirable vegetation when applied to such vegetation in pre- or postemergence application. The composition is generally embodied in formulations which contain inert or occasionally active ingredients or diluent carriers in addition to the active compounds. Examples of such ingredients or carriers are water, organic solvents, surface active agents, oil, water-in-oil emulsions, wetting agents, dispersing agents, and emulsifying agents. The herbicidal formulations generally take the form of wettable powders, solutions or emulsifiable concentrates. Wettable powders are finely divided compositions comprising a particulate carrier impregnated with the herbicidal compound and additionally containing one or more surface active agents. The surface active agent promotes rapid dispersion of the powder in aqueous medium to form stable, sprayable suspensions. A wide variety of surface active agents can be used, for example, long chain fatty alcohols and alkali metal salts of the sulfated fatty alcohols; salts of sulfonic acid; esters of long chain fatty acids; and polyhydric alcohols, in which the alcohol groups are free, omega-substituted polyethylene glycols of relatively long chain length. The herbicidal composition can also be applied to the foliage in the form of a solution in a suitable solvent. Solvents frequently used in herbicidal formulations include kerosene, fuel oil, xylene, petroleum fractions with boiling ranges above xylene, and aromatic petroleum fractions rich in methylated naphthalenes. The most preferred formulations are emulsifiable concentrates which consist of an oil solution of the herbicide along with an emulsifying agent. Prior to use the concentrate is diluted with water to form a suspended emulsion of oil droplets. The emulsifiers used are usually a mixture of anionic and nonionic surfactants. Other additives such as spreading agents and stickers can be included in the emulsifiable concentrate. The formulations described above can be applied to the vegetation sought to be controlled in any conventional manner either before or after the vegetation has emerged from the soil. The vegetation can be in any stage of development after emergence, ranging from seedlings to fully grown plants. Application can be achieved by any conventional technique such as the use of ground spraying equipment or aircraft-mounted sprayers. Various other application techniques will be apparent to one skilled in the pesticide art.

Claims: Claims for the following Contracting States: BE, CH, DE, FR, GB, IT, LI, NL A synergistic herbicidal composition comprising a mixture of: (a) a synergistically effective amount of 2-(2-chloro-4-methane-sulfonylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione; and (b) a synergistically effective amount of 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine, at a weight ratio of (a) to (b) of from 0.1:1 to 20:1. A synergistic herbicidal composition comprising a mixture of: (a) a synergistically effective amount of 2-(2-chloro-4-methane-sulfonylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione; (b) a synergistically effective amount of 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine; and (c) an inert diluent carrier, at a weight ratio of (a) to (b) of from 0.01:1 to 20:1. A method of controlling undesirable vegetation which comprises the application to said vegetation of a herbicidal composition comprising: (a) a synergistically effective amount of 2-(2-chloro-4-methanesulfonylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione; and (b) a synergistically effective amount of 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine, at a weight ratio of (a) to (b) of from 0.1:1 to 20:1. Claims for the following Contracting States: AT, GR, ES A process for preparing a synergistic herbicidal composition comprising mixing of: (a) a synergistically effective amount of 2-(2-chloro-4-methanesulfonylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione; and (b) a synergistically effective amount of 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine, at a weight ratio of (a) to (b) of from 0.1:1 to 20:1. A process for preparing a synergistic herbicidal composition comprising mixing of: (a) a synergistically effective amount of 2-(2-chloro-4-methanesulfonylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione; (b) a synergistically effective amount of 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine; and (c) an inert diluent carrier, at a weight ratio of (a) to (b) of from 0.01:1 to 20:1. A method of controlling undesirable vegetation which comprises the application to said vegetation of a herbicidal composition comprising: (a) a synergistically effective amount of 2-(2-chloro-4-methanesulfonylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione; and (b) a synergistically effective amount of 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine, at a weight ratio of (a) to (b) of from 0.1:1 to 20:1. A synergistic herbicidal composition comprising a mixture of: (a) a synergistically effective amount of 2-(2-chloro-4-methanesulfonylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione; and (b) a synergistically effective amount of 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine, at a weight ratio of (a) to (b) of from 0.1:1 to 20:1. A synergistic herbicidal composition comprising a mixture of: (a) a synergistically effective amount of 2-(2-chloro-4-methanesulfonylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione; (b) a synergistically effective amount of 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine; and (c) an inert diluent carrier, at a weight ratio of (a) to (b) of from 0.01:1 to 20:1.

Inventors: KENG-HSIN HSU, JOANNA
Applicants: STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY
Application year: 1986
Main classification: A01N43
IPC codes: A01N43, A01N41