DEVICE FOR REGENERATION OF ELECTROANALYTICAL PROBES

Abstract: The method serves to regenerate electroanalytical probes (12) that have at least one working electrode (14), at least one counter electrode (16) and, optionally, a guard electrode (18); for such regeneration, at least one of the probe's electrodes (14, 16, 18), while in contact with a non-polluting and non-aggressive aqueous regeneration el­ ectrolyte (17), is subjected to a current density that is substantially and typically 100 to 1000 times higher than the maximum current density at the electrode (14) when the probe (12) is used for electroanalytical operation, the current density being generated at the at least one probe electrode (14, 16, 18) by a voltage or potential be­ tween the probe electrode (14, 16, 18) and a regenerator electrode (15) external to the probe (12), the regenerator electrode (15) also being in electrolytically conductive contact with the aqueous regeneration electrolyte (17). A preferred regeneration device is formed by an enclosure means (10) having a lower and an upper end (101, 102); the lower end can be sealingly closed by the sensing end (121) of the probe (12) that is to be regenerated; a regen­ erator electrode (15) external to the probe is arranged within the enclosure (10) intermediate the two ends (101, 102) and at a sufficient distance from the lower end (101) to provide, when the end (101) is sealingly closed by the sensing end (121), an electrolyte space (105) for receiv­ ing and holding a liquid electrolyte (17) in contact with the regenerator electrode (15) and the probe electrodes (14, 16, 18); a lead (151) serves to connect the regenerat­ or electrode (15) with a first outlet (191) of an electric current source (19), the second outlet (192) of which will be in electrical contact with at least one of the probe el­ ectrodes (14, 16, 18) when the device (1) includes liquid electrolyte (17) and is operated to regenerate the probe (12).

Description: Electroanalytical methods and probes have always been look­ ed at with the expectation that they offer an avenue to quick and effective analysis of constituents, or constitu­ ent concentrations, in ambient media of vital interest, such as water and air; however, it was only the advent of the membrane-enclosed amperometric cell, also termed "Clark Cell" because of Leland C. Clark Jr., the inventor of U.S. Patent 2,913,386 (issued 1959), that caused an effective break-through. Reliability and precision of analysis with the Clark Cell have increased substantially and many new fields of applic­ ation have become apparent. In fact, there are few fields of technology where detection of critical yet possibly min­ ute concentrations of elemental oxygen and other electro­ active species of interest (herein termed EASI) is of no apparent impact upon optimization. Probably the most important single factor in the success of the Clark Cell or membrane-enclosed amperometric cell (MEAC for short herein) is the membrane assumed to be a "semi-­ permeable" stratum between an ambient or probe medium that contains the species of interest and the electrolyte within the cell; the membrane "protects" the cell's interior. Many films of organic polymers are substantially imperme­ able to the cell electrolyte, frequently an aqueous and generally fluid medium capable of generating ions, while permitting passage of gases to a larger or lesser extent, and all such films tend to normally prevent "pollution" of the cell electrolyte and of the electrodes by probe com­ ponents. Main exceptions are pollution problems by "electrode pois­ oning", typically by sulphurous gases, such as H₂S or SO₂, and "electrode plating", typically by electrodeposition of metal from the counter electrode on the working electrode. While various specific methods have been suggested to av­ oid such pollution through the membrane and within the cell, the most generally accepted method of dealing with these problems is the combined use of electrodes made of, or coated with, noble metals, typically gold, metals from the platinum group (Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, Pt) and alloys contain­ ing major portions of one or more such noble metals, to­ gether with regular maintenance of MEACs by exchanging both the cell electrolyte and the membrane. Of course, use of noble metals for the electrodes and ex­ changing the electrolyte have other reasons as well but the chemically inert nature of noble metals, notably in a pol­ ished, e.g. mirror-bright, state provided for easy control and removal of surface impurities at the electrode surface. Frequently, poisoning effects, plating and other undesir­ able electrode changes will be detected because of discolor­ ation, speck formation or other irregularities that will be easily seen by visual inspection of the surface of the el­ ectrode and, at the same time, can be easily removed by simple prior art cleaning techniques, i.e. to wash away or dissolve pollutant deposits on the electrode with a relat­ ively mild chemical reagent, such as ammonia, thiourea, thiosulphate and the like complexing agents and perhaps to polish the electrode surface. Previous research by applicant has led to the discovery of several "quasi-polluting" effects, such as permeation of electrolyte into the interface between the electrode and an adjacent insulator as well as various permeation-induced or solubility-related but always unwanted contributions to, or changes of, the measuring current; these effects and various structures and methods for avoiding them have been disclosed, for example, in German Patent 2 851 447, U.S. Patents 4,096,047 and 4,518,447, European Patent 0 043 611 and U.S. Ser. No. 743,155 filed June 10, 1985. As a result, MEAC sensitivity has been increased to the ex­ tent that trace amounts of typical electroactive species of interest including oxygen and hydrogen in the ppb (10⁻⁹) range have become detectable and continuously surveyable by routine analysis methods. Increased MEAC sensitivity, while leading to new fields of application, also and inevitably has the side effect of pointing up new problems that could not have been detected with less sensitive methods and which may reside in the particularities of a novel field of application, such as microbial growth problems in bio-­ technological fields, or in the specifics of the measuring instrument proper. Considering that ppb-measurement with MEACs entails measure­ ment of currents in the Microampere to Picoampere range it will be understood that very minor changes indeed, such as aging of polymers with concurrent change of electrical pro­ perties, or long-term creep strength of structural materi­ als may become observable and have an influence upon the measuring method or the measured results, and it is poss­ ible that time-dependent "degeneration" of a probe's be­ haviour will be caused by a variety of effects, some of which may involve small and hardly detectable surface chan­ ges induced by sorptive or chemical processes at the electr­ ode surface. Insofar as such effects are time-related and not easily re­ versible without exchange of probe components, they can be generally described as "aging" effects of MEACs and similar electroanalytical probes resulting in a limited life of the probe. Applicant's review of long-term operation behaviour of MEACs has pointed up two specific problem factors that might, at least in part, be considered time-dependent in the sense of increasing with the operation time or operative life of a MEAC and being not, or not easily, reversible; the factors can be summed up by the terms "sluggish response" and "noi­ sy current output" of MEACs. "Sluggish response" means that the probe response to a pre­ determined change of EASI concentration becomes slower with continued length of operation and may be determined, for example, by exposing an oxygen sensing MEAC to normal air, then dipping it into an oxygen-free probe medium, measuring the time interval required to reach a substantially constant "zero-current" and comparing such results in dependence up­ on the time length of MEAC operation. "Noisy current output" is observed when a probe is exposed to a probe medium that includes a constant EASI concentr­ ation yet generates an uneven signal, again observing time-­ related changes, if any. Both "sluggish response" and "noisy current output" have been found to be more or less time-dependent, sometimes to the extent of limiting the useful operative life of a MEAC. Accordingly, the main object of the present invention is to provide for regeneration of membrane-enclosed amperometric cells and similar electroanalytical probes (EAP hereinafter) with the beneficial effect of eliminating or substantially reducing time-related change of the probe behaviour includ­ ing, but not restricted to, sluggish response and noisy cur­ rent output of MEACs and similar EAPs. The term "regeneration" as used herein is intended to indic­ ate a complete or nearly complete (say at least 75 % of an original value) recovery of at least one operational proper­ ty that has deteriorated as a consequence of a more or less prolonged operation, or an operation causing accelerated de­ terioration of an operational probe property, said recovery being achieved without replacement of main cell components other than electrolyte and membrane, and substantially with­ out loss of material such as would be incurred as a conse­ quence of grinding or other drastic ways of materially re­ moving a deteriorated electrode surface. It has been found according to the invention that regener­ ation in the sense just defined of MEACs and similar EAPs can be achieved if one or more electrodes of the probe is/­ are subjected, in the presence of a non-polluting and non-­ aggressive aqueous electrolyte, to the effect of a current density that is substantially and typically 100 to 1000 ti­ mes higher than the maximum current densities that occur when the probe is used for electroanalytical operation. In order to generate such current densities at a probe electr­ ode for probe regeneration a voltage is applied be­ tween that probe electrode and a regenerator electrode which is external to the probe and is in electrolytically conduct­ ive contact (= permitting passage of ions) with the probe electrodes, normally by also contacting the electrolyte pres­ ent. It has been found according to the invention that time-de­ pendent deteriorations of EAPs including sluggish response and noisy current output can be substantially eliminated by such a regeneration method up to the point that the cell will show its best ex-factory or "virgin" properties. A "non-polluting and non-aggressive aqueous electrolyte" for the inventive method is one which under the operating conditions of the regeneration including temperature, re­ generation time, applied current density and voltage will neither attack the probe (e.g. as evidenced by the absence of dissolved electrode material in the electrolyte after regeneration) nor deposit any noxious constituents or pro­ ducts on the electrode surface. Specific and preferred ex­ amples will be given below. An electrolyte constituent is regarded as "noxious" herein if its presence causes a de­ terioration of probe performance. Operating conditions of the inventive regeneration process include temperatures in the range from just above the freez­ ing point of the electrolyte to just below its boiling point; a temperature range between 10 and 50°C is preferr­ ed and a range between 15 and 40°C is particularly preferr­ ed. Temperatures below 15°C are not normally preferred be­ cause longer treatment times may be required to achieve a given degree of regeneration (e.g. measured in terms of a defined response time or current "noise"); temperatures above 50°C are less preferred as they might damage, endan­ ger, or deteriorate one or more cell components. Generally, the temperature during regeneration treatment as measured in the electrolyte should be within the "normal operative temperature range" of the electroanalytical probe (term de­ fined, e.g. in EP 0 085 450) that is regenerated according to the invention. The time normally required for optimum regeneration accord­ ing to the invention will be in the range of from a few seconds, say 5 seconds, to a few hours, say up to 5 hours; typical preferred times at temperatures between 20 to 30°C will be in the range of 20 seconds to 200 minutes, when the electrode surfaces consist of nobel metals and if cur­ rent densities and voltages are within their preferred ran­ ges as well. As indicated above, current densities (expressed herein as µA/cm² or mA/cm²) that are operable in the inventive regen­ eration method must be substantially higher than the maxim­ um current density at which the probe is used for electro­ analytical operation. In general, the current density for the inventive regeneration will be at least ten times and, typically at least a hundred times higher than those of an­ alytical probe operation. For example, typical probes of the MEAC type for determination of oxygen, hydrogen and similar EASI will operate with a working electrode having an electrolyte-exposed surface of gold, platinum-group met­ al or alloys thereof at current densities, at the working electrode (cathode or anode, respectively), of less than 100 µA/cm², e.g. up to 25 µA/cm². Accordingly, the regener­ ation current density at the working electrode should be above 1 mA/cm², preferably above 10 mA/cm² and typically in the range of from 10 to 1000 mA/cm², a range of from 50 to 800 mA/cm² being preferred for many purposes. The up­ er current density limit is not believed to be critical per se as regards regeneration and current densities above 1000 mA/cm² could be used if the probe structure (e.g. dia­ meter of lead wires, soldered connections, etc.) is capable to absorb the Joulean heat caused by such currents without damage. For reasons to be explained in more detail below, the volt­ age applied between a probe's electrode and the external regenerator electrode should generally be above 1.2 V, e.g. in the range of from 1.5 to 15 V; a preferred upper limit of the voltage range is 4.5 V. Typical electroanalytical probes that can be regenerated according to the invention have at least one working electr­ ode ("sensing electrode") and at least one counter electr­ ode (frequently a "consumable" electrode); the EAP may fur­ ther have a so-called guard electrode (cf. DE Patent 2 851 447) and one or more of these probe electrodes can be involved in the inventive regeneration. For most purposes, regeneration of the working electrode is of primary importance but regeneration of the other electr­ odes may also be quite desirable; since the inventive me­ thod when practiced as disclosed herein has no detrimental effect regardless of which probe electrode is regenerated, a typical regeneration made e.g. in the course of normal EAP maintenance will involve all probe electrodes. The probe electrode may be regenerated one after the other or simultaneously. For optimum results current control may be required, notably in simultaneous regeneration of sever­ al probe electrodes; for individual or sequential probe el­ ectrode regeneration with the preferred current sources disclosed herein particular current control is not requir­ ed when standard EAPs are regenerated. Generally, the electrolyte-exposed surface of the probe el­ ectrodes consists of Ag, Au, a platinum group metal, an al­ oy of the mentioned metals or of a stainless steel, e.g. 316 grade or equivalent high grade alloys that are resistant to the normal operating conditions of the probe. For many types of probe use, the counter electrode preferably con­ sists of silver or a conventional combination of silver and a silver compound, e.g. an Ag/AgCl combination. As regards specific examples of electrolytes suitable for the inventive method the requirements of being "non-pollut­ ing" (reference is working electrode) and "non-aggressive" imply that the aqueous electrolyte should be substantially free of water-insoluble or water-immiscible constituents as well as of metal-dissolving, metal-reacting and metal-com­ plexing constituents, such as zinc and any heavy metal cat­ ions and cyanide anions; further, the presence of organic surfactants is not normally preferred. A resistivity in the range from about 10 to about 10,000 Ohm·cm is typical for the electrolyte. A first group of electrolytes preferred for the inventive regeneration method includes those aqueous electrolytes that are normally used in the EAP or MEAC for normal electroanal­ ytical operation, i.e. when the electrolyte within the cell is covered by the semipermeable membrane; it will be under­ stood in this context that the membrane will not be mounted when the EAP is subjected to the inventive regeneration. For example, the electrolyte for regeneration may include cations selected from alkali metals, alkaline earth metals and ammonium, while suitable anions can be selected from hydroxides, carbonates, bicarbonates, phosphates and hal­ ides; sulphates and nitrates are suitable but less preferr­ ed. Cations of metals that are capable of forming intermet­ allic compounds or solid solutions with the noble metal of the working electrode, such as zinc and heavy metals, should be avoided in the electrolyte. Typical concentrations of any given anion or cation are gen­ erally below about 2 M and a total concentration of dissolv­ ed electrolyte of not substantially above 20 %, by weight of the electrolyte, is preferred. When using strongly alkal­ ine electrolyte components, such as alkali metal hydroxides, concentrations should be sufficiently low to preclude dam­ age to cell components; acid salts and acids, e.g. hydro­ halide acids, may be used under the same precaution but are less preferred for typical regeneration. Buffered electrol­ ytes my be used but are not normally required. More specif­ ic examples will be given in the working examples. While not wishing to be bound by any specific theory, it can be assumed that the beneficial results obtainable by the in­ ventive regeneration method using the effects of relative­ ly high current densities in the presence of electrolyte are based in part, at least, upon the effects of incipient gas formation at the working electrode. Investigations into the phenomena occurring at the electrode/electrolyte interface during electrolytic metal deposition indicate that the gener­ ation of hydrogen or oxygen at a respective electrode during electrolysis of water from the electrolyte is generally acc­ ompanied by a supersaturation of the electrolyte near the electrode so that each nucleation that leads to formation of a gas bubble causes a minute pressure shock, probably at velocities in the sonic range; gas evolution at the electro­ des upon electrolytical decomposition of water may thus be envisaged as being accompanied by a multiplicity of sonic shocks at or near the electrode surface. It is assumed, however, that gas formation and any secondary consequences thereof are not the only cause of the remark­ able regeneration effects of the inventive method and direct reactions including reductive or oxidative changes may be in­ volved. It is to be emphasized in this context that so-called elec­ trolytical degreasing is conventional since almost a cent­ ury, and that electroanalytical probes of the MEAC type have been in use since two and a half decades; yet, electrolytic­ al cleaning has never been proposed, to applicant's know­ ledge, as a treatment for electroanalytical probes. By the same or a similar token, removal of metal coatings by electrolytical means is a conventional step, e.g. in gravimetric analysis involving electrolytical deposition of a metal of interest upon a platinum electrode; since such electrodes are re-used many times, removal of metallic de­ posits by reversing the polarity of the platinum electrode and increasing the current for quick removal has been a conventional step, yet does not seem to have precipitated the teaching that a comparable method could be of use for regeneration of MEACs and similar probes. It will be observ­ ed in this context that a "reversal of polarity" may, but need not, be involved in the inventive regeneration method, e.g. that a probe electrode that is the cathode (anode) in normal analytical probes will be the anode (cathode) in the regeneration method, i.e. vis-a-vis the external or regener­ ator electrode. The general and critical parameter is the increased current density in the presence of the aqueous electrolyte; polar­ ity may be reversed but non-reversal may be preferred for a number of important embodiments, notably regeneration of the (normally cathodic) working electrode of oxygen sensors and of the working electrodes of (normally anodic) hydrogen sens­ ors. Non-noble metals should be made cathodic. Direct current is preferred but a pulsing DC is suitable as well and periodic or aperiodic reversal of polarity may be of use for special purposes. A typical and preferred current source for carrying out the inventive method, notably under field conditions, is an optionally rechargeable 3 to 4.5 V battery of the type used for flash-lights and similar pur­ poses if its capacity is sufficient to supply the current densities required for regeneration and a voltage sufficient for electrolytical decomposition of water, i.e. at least ab­ out 1.2 V. Generally, the regenerator electrode external to the MEAC or similar EAP should be made of an electrically conduct­ ive material that will not produce or introduce contamin­ ants when used under operating conditions of the inventive method; noble metals of the type suitable for the working electrode are generally suitable for the regenerator electr­ ode, at least in those portions thereof that are in electr­ olytical contact with the aqueous electrolyte. However, for reasons of costs, less valuable electrode mat­ erials can be used for the regenerator electrode and elec­ trically conductive carbon, e.g. in the form of graphite, is a preferred material for the external regenerator electr­ ode herein. While any suitable arrangement of the external electrode and the aqueous regeneration electrolyte for carrying out the inventive method can be used, e.g. a cup, flask or similar enclosure means for the regenerator electrolyte and the re­ generator electrode, it is greatly preferred according to the invention to use an enclosure means with two open ends, e.g. a tubular structure or sleeve, that is capable of being sealingly closed at one end by the electroanalytical probe that is to be regenerated. The advantage of a regenerating device embodying such a structure is that a very small amount of regeneration electr­ olyte will normally be sufficient for regeneration of a pro­ be and that, as a rule, the regeneration electrolyte will automatically be discarded after regeneration so as to pre­ clude recontamination effects. Accordingly, the invention includes, as a general struct­ ural embodiment, a novel regenerator for electroanalytical probes having an enclosure or sleeve formed by a generally tubular structure made of an inert insulator and having two ends; the lower end of the sleeve will be closed and sealed by the sensing end of the probe that is to undergo regeneration; the regenerator includes an electrode, e.g. made of graphite, situated for contact with an electrolyte that is introduced into the sleeve after the lower end the­ reof is closed by the probe. Then, one end of a current source is connected with the re­ generator electrode while the other is connected with at least one electrode of the probe. With a simple DC current source, such as a standard 3 V battery, the regenerator thus mounted will be capable to cause a current density of 50 to 800 mA/cm² at the probe electrodes. After a period of from typically 30 seconds to 60 minutes the probe is regenerated as evidenced by the quick response and lack of current noise which is character­ istic for a new probe in "virgin" condition. Preferred embodiments of the inventive device have the feat­ ures recited in claims 9 to 14 and will be explained in more detail by reference to the drawings, in which Figure 1A is a diagrammatic cross-sectional view of a regenerator device according to the invention; Figure 1B is an enlarged representation of the regenerat­ or of Figure 1A shown with an electroanalytical probe in position for regeneration; and Figure 1C is a diagrammatic top view of Figure 1A. The regenerator 1 shown in all Figures is formed by an en­ closure or sleeve 10 having a tubular body portion 11 made of a structural plastic such as a polyacetal (e.g. DELRIN, reg. trademark), a teflon-type fluorocarbon, a polyamide or the like cell insulator material of the type disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,096,047 for MEACs. The lower end 101 of body 11 is dimensioned to receive the sensing end of an EAP as explained below; a sealing means 13 is formed for engagement with the end portion of the EAP and comprises an annular recess 131 that holds an O-ring 132 or the like sealing member. The upper end 102 of the enclosure 10 is formed by an annular mounting member or ring 111 conn­ ected with body 11 by a thread 113 or the like connection. A passage 112 is provided in ring 111 for a lead wire 151, e.g. of platinum, that provides for an electrical connect­ ion of regenerator electrode 15 with an electrical source 19 via connection 193. The regenerator electrode 15 is an annular structure made of graphite inserted into recess 114 and securely held in body 11 by ring 111. The end face 103 or similar end portion or shoulder serves as a stop means for positioning a probe as explained below. The overall sleeve-type structure of the preferred regener­ ator 1 is further apparent from the top view shown in Fig. 1C. Figure 1B shows the regenerator 1 of Fig. 1A and 1C in an enlarged presentation with a conventional MEAC as probe 12 including an optional guard electrode 18 in addition to a working electrode 14 and counter electrode 16, depicted in a diagrammatic representation. A shoulder 123 or the like edge of probe 12 acts as a sec­ ond stop means to cooperate with the first stop means 103 at the lower end 101 of regenerator 10 so that the sensing face 121 (membrane removed prior to insertion) extends into the electrolyte receiving space 105 formed within regenerator 1 in the vicinity of the regenerator electrode 15. Probe 12 comprises a sensing electrode 14 having an exposed circular surface 140 made of Au or Pt. Electrode 14 is en­ closed by an insulator 142 and is electrically connected with a lead or connector 141. The guard electrode 18 having an exposed surface 180 extends around the sensing electrode in a concentric manner and has a connector 181 at the out­ let end of probe 12. Another insulator layer 162 is arranged between guard elec­ trode 18 and counter electrode 16 having an exposed surface 160 and a connector 161 at the outlet of probe 12. The hous­ ing 122 of probe 12 normally consists of an insulator mat­ erial and extends into a cylindrical end portion 124. For use of the regenerator 1 according to the invention an electrolyte 17, e.g. an aqueous 1N KOH solution, is filled via upper end 102 into space 105 to contact the entire sens­ ing face 121 of probe 12 including the surfaces of electr­ odes 14, 16, 18 and a major portion of surface 150 of regen­ erator electrode 15. Next, the second outlet end 192 of DC source 19 will be con­ nected via a connection 194 with at least one probe electr­ ode 14, 16, 18, e.g. by a distributor or switch 195 serving to connect source 19 alternatingly as shown (or simultane­ ously with appropriate current control if desired) with the connector ends 141, 161, 181 of the probe electrodes by ap­ propriate lines 196, 197, 198. After a suitable period of regeneration of the probe electr­ odes, e.g. 15 secons to 15 minutes per electrode, electro­ lyte 17 will be poured out through end 102 and switch 195 is moved in non-connecting position; flushing of regenerat­ or 1 and probe 12 with electrolyte and/or water in connect­ ed position is optional. Switch 195 may be automated for providing predetermined regeneration periods of the probe electrodes. Then, probe 12 is withdrawn from regenerator 1 and is ready for use after receiving the required electrolyte and membr­ ane in conventional manner, e.g. as disclosed in European Patent 0 043 611. Specific examples of such regeneration operations will be given below; general parameters of the examples are as follows: The criterion for the effect of the inventive probe regener­ ation used in the examples is the "response time" applied as a standard test; it is to be noted, however, that other advantageous effects including reduction or substantial el­ imination of output current noise as well as substantially complete removal of various fouling effects incurred upon analytical probe operation in probe-contaminating environ­ ments etc. have been observed but are less amenable to quantified expression. Hence, response time is used as a summary criterion for overall probe performance here. The response time test is a standard method for testing probes that leave the factory in "virgin" condition. Gener­ ally, a response time of 10 minutes or less is regarded as indicating acceptable operation of a new probe when fitted with a 25 µm thick perfluoro alkoxy membrane (PFA); the test includes an "oxygen concentration step" (exposure to air or air-saturated water, on the one hand, and submersion in a medium known to be free of elemental oxygen) and meas­ urement of the time from the application of the concentr­ ation step to the moment when the instrument for electro­ analytical operation indicates a value of 10 ppb (per bil­ lion, 10⁹). The oxygen levels in the particular test corr­ espond to 8 ppm (per million) before and zero ppb (per bil­ lion) after the step. Example 1 A used MEAC as probe 12 exhibiting a response time of 21 minutes was regenerated in the device shown in Fig. 1A us­ ing 3 ml of a standard electrolyte (56 g KOH and 74 g KCl per liter of water) for electroanalytical operation. Regen­ erator electrode 15 was connected with the positive output of a 3 V DC power supply. Probe electrodes 14, 16, 18 were connected successively, each for 30 seconds, with the neg­ ative output of the DC supply. Probe 12 was withdrawn from regenerator 1, washed with tap water, filled with the standard electrolyte and provided with a standard 25 µm membrane of a teflon (PFA). In the standard test the regenerated probe exhibited a resp­ onse time of less than 5 minutes. All values measured were taken at room temperature (20-25°C). The MEAC was an oxygen sensor, Model 2110, Orbisphere Laboratories, Geneva, Swit­ zerland). Examples 2-5 The method of example 1 was repeated; response times before and after regeneration were recorded and various electroly­ tes were used; the details are summarized in the following table:

Claims: 1. A method for regenerating an electroanalytical probe (12) having at least one working electrode (14), at least one counter electrode (16) and, optionally, a guard electrode (18); said method being characterized by subjecting at least one of said probe electrodes (14, 16, 18) while in contact with a non-polluting and non-aggressive aqueous regeneration electrolyte (17) to a current density that is substantially higher than the maximum current density at said at least one probe electrode (14, 16, 18) when said probe (12) is used for electroanalytical operation, said current density being generated at said at least one probe electrode (14, 16, 18) by a voltage be­ tween said probe electrode (14, 16, 18) and a regenerator electrode (15) external to said probe (12), said regenerat­ or electrode (15) also being in electrolytically conduct­ ive contact with said aqueous regeneration electrolyte (17). 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said probe electrode that is subjected to said substantially higher current density is the working electrode (14) of the probe (12). 3. The method of claims 1 or 2 wherein said probe electrode that is subjected to said substantially higher current density is the counter electrode (16) of the probe (12). 4. The method of any of claims 1 to 3 wherein said probe el­ ectrode that is subject to said substantially higher cur­ rent density is said guard electrode (18) of the probe (12). 5. The method of any of claims 1 to 4 wherein said substanti­ ally higher current density is in the range of from 1 to 1000 mA/cm², based upon the electrolyte-exposed surface area of said probe electrode (14, 16, 18) when used for electroanalytical operation. 6. The method of any of claims 1 to 5 wherein the electro­ lyte-exposed surface (140) of said working electrode (14) is made of a noble metal selected from gold, platinum group metals and alloys thereof. 7. The method of any of claims 1 to 6 wherein said counter­ electrode (16) consists, at least in part, of elemental silver or of silver plus silver compounds. 8. The method of any of claims 4 to 7 wherein the electrol­ yte-exposed surface (180) of said guard electrode (18) consists of a noble metal selected from silver, gold, platinum group metals and alloys thereof or of stain­ less steel. 9. A regeneration device (1) for an electroanalytical probe (12), characterized by an enclosure means (10) having: a first or lower end (101) and a second or upper end (102), said first end (101) being adapted to be sealing­ ly closed by the sensing end (121) of an electroanalytic­ al probe (12) having at least one working electrode (14), at least one counter electrode (16), and, optionally, a guard electrode (18); a regenerator electrode (15) extern­ al to said probe and arranged within said enclosure means (10) intermediate said first (101) and said second (102) end and at a sufficient distance from said first end (101) to provide, when said first end (101) is sealingly closed by said sensing end (121), an electrolyte space (105) for receiving and holding a liquid electrolyte (17) in con­ tact with said regenerator electrode (15) and said probe electrodes (14, 16, 18); and a lead means (151) for conn­ ecting said regenerator electrode (15) with a first out­ let (191) of an electric current source (19), the second outlet (192) of which will be contacted with at least one of said probe electrodes (14, 16, 18) when said device (1) includes sand liquid electrolyte (17) and is operated to regenerate said probe (12). 10. The device of claim 9 wherein said enclosure means (10) is a generally tubular body (11) comprising a sealing means (13) near said first end (101), said regenerator electrode (15) being arranged adjacent said second end (102). 11. The device of claim 9 or 10 wherein a first stop means (103) is provided at said first end (101) of said enclos­ ure means (10) for cooperation with a second stop means (123) of said electroanalytical probe (12) so as to define a regeneration position of said probe (12) in said device (1) when said first stop means (103) contacts said sec­ ond stop means (123). 12. The device of any of claims 9 to 11 wherein said enclos­ ure means (10) is formed by a generally tubular struct­ ure (11) made of substantially inert and electrically non-conducting material, while said regenerator electrode (15) is made of graphite. 13. The device of any of claims 9 to 12 wherein said first end (101) of said enclosure means (10) is shaped to fitt­ ingly receive a cylindrical end portion (124) of probe (12). 14. The device of any of claims 9 to 12 further comprising a branch or switch means (195) for connecting the second outlet (194) of said current source with one of said el­ ectrodes (14, 16, 18) of probe (12).

Inventors: GAGESCU, DAN
Applicants: ORBISPHERE CORPORATION WILMINGTON SUCCURSALE DE COLLONGE-BELLERIVE
Application year: 1985
Main classification: G01N27
IPC codes: G01N27