SELECTIVE SYNTHESES OF SUBSTITUTED AMINES

Abstract: Selective mono- or di-amination of alkanediols is con­ trollably obtained by catalytic reaction with secondary amines at moderate temperature and autogenous pressure, by selection of the catalyst employed. Ruthenium complexes compounded or admixed with organic phosphines, such as triphenylphosphine, favor high yields of aminoalkanol, while ruthenium complexes in the absence of organic phosphines favor production of alkylene diamine. lridium complexes with or without triphenylphosphine in admixture or chemical combination, also promote production of alkylenediamine.

Description: SELECTIVE SYNTHESES OF SUBSTITUTED AMINES TECHNICAL FIELD 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to catalytic reactions of alkanediols with secondary amines and is particularly concerned with the controlled selective production of reaction products therefrom predominating respectively (1) in alkanolamines or (2) alkylenediamines. 2. Prior Art It is known to produce certain N-substituted alkanediamines and various alkanolamines from dichloroalkanes and alkylene oxides, respectively. These starting materials are expensive and/or extremely toxic. The toxic nature of some of the alkylene oxides is a special problem for small-scale users, since the unit costs of installing safe-guards and monitoring systems increase with decreasing production scale. Previous prior art attempts at aminating alkanediols have been limited to high temperature reactions utilizing heterogeneous catalysts. The high temperatures required in the prior art methods led to high operating pressures and low selectivities. A limited number of prior art disclosures describe the use of homogeneous catalysts, e.g. RhH(PPh3)4. for the reaction of monoalcohols with amines. (See. for example, Grigg. et al, J.C.S. Chem. Comm., pp 611-612 (1981)). European Patent Publication No. 034,480 describes in general the preparation of N-alkylamine or N,N-dialkylamine by reacting a primary or secondary amine with a primary or secondary alcohol in the presence of certain noble metal catalysts, such as the metal, salt or complex of the noble metal. The preferred example of catalyst is a rhodium hydride-triphenylphosphine complex. Although the disclosure is concerned largely with reactions involving monofunctional alcohols. there is also disclosed the reaction of a primary amine with a diol for the formation of heterocyclic ring compounds containing the amine N atom. For this purpose, the diol used should contain at least four atoms in the chain so that cyclization can occur. The publication contains no disclosure of reaction of a diol with secondary amine, wherein cyclization is not possible. An article by Murahashi, et al. in Tetrahedron Letters (vol. 23. No. 2, pp. 229-232. (1982)) describes the synthesis of secondary amines by reaction of alcohols with amines in the presence of RuH2(PPh3)4 catalyst. By the reaction of butane diol or higher alkane diols with n-hexylamine, N-heterocyclic compounds are formed. U.S. Patent 3,708,539 discloses the condensation of amines with alcohols in the presence of ruthenium or certain other noble metal catalysts introduced as halides. The process is preferably conducted in the presence of a biphilic ligand of the structure ER3. wherein E may be phosphorus or arsenic. Particular examples are directed to (1) reaction of butanol with dibutylamine obtaining tributylamine; (2) using hexanol as reactant in the same manner resulted in the formation of dibutylhexylamine. Reaction of diols with ammonia or alkylamines to produce diaminoalkanes is disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,270,059. The reaction is carried out in the presence of hydrogen at 150-3000C and at a pressure of at least 10 atmospheres, over solid catalyts which contain at least one metal from the group consisting of cobalt and nickel. When secondary amine is employed as reactant, tertiary diamines are obtained. Reaction of ethylene glycol with diethylamine under the conditions of the patent yields chiefly tetraethylethylene diamine and a lesser amount of diethylethanolamine. The selective conversion of primary amines into (I) N,N-dimethylalkyl- or (II) N,N-dialkylmethyl-amines by reaction with methanol in the presence of RuC12(Ph3P)3 catalyst, is disclosed in an article by Arcelli, et al. in the Journal of Organometallic Chemistry (vol. 235. pp. 93-96 (1982]). The selectivity towards the I or II type compound is controlled by choice of the amount of catalyst and the ratio of reactants. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, tertiary alkanolamines and alkanediamines are selectively produced in high yield from alkanediols by reaction with secondary amines in the presence of ruthenium or iridium complexes. Selectivity favoring production of alkanolamines (i.e.. mono-amination) is achieved by the use of a complex of a ruthenium compound with a ligand such as triphenylphosphine or a mixture of the ruthenium compound with such ligand. Selectivity toward production of alkanediamines is achieved by the use of an iridium complex catalyst, or of the ruthenium compound in the absence of the phosphine component. DETAILED DECRIPTION In practice of the invention, a solution of a secondary amine and alkanediol is stirred in the presence of the ruthenium or iridium catalyst at 50-2000C for two to six hours. The preferred temperature range is at about 80 to 1600C, with lower temperatures giving lower reaction rates and higher temperatures tending to effect dehydrogenation and/or decarbonylation of the diol. The secondary amines can be represented by the formula: HNR2 in which -NR2 is EMI4.1 and in which "alk" and "alk'" are alkyl groups of up to 20 carbon atoms. The alkane diols can include up to 12 carbon atoms with a linear or branched carbon skeleton. Preferably the hydroxyl groups of the alcohol functionalities should be separated by not more than one carbon. Most preferably, the diols should be vicinal diols. Example of most preferred diols include ethylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol, 2,3-butanediol, 3-methyl-1,2-butanediol, 1.2-cyclohexanediol and 1,2-cyclododecanediol. The concentration of the secondary amine may be in the range 0.5 to 10 mols per liter of reaction medium, preferably 1 to 5 mols/liter. The catalyst concentration may be generally in the range of 10 to 10 1 mols per liter of reaction medium, preferably 10 3 to 10 2 molsSliter. Selectivity of the reaction can be altered to give mainly mono-amination (production of alkanolamines) or di-amination (production of alkylene diamines), by proper choice of catalyst. Proven catalysts that favor mono-amination are: RuC12(PPh3)3, RuHCl(PPh3)3; RuC13.xH2O admixed with about 3 moles/mole of PPh3; (Ru(NH3)6)C13 admixed with 3 moles/mole of PPh3; K2((RuCl5)2O). Ru(NO)C13, K2RuCl5. K2RuC16, and tRu(NH3)6)C12, each admixed with about 3 moles/mole of PPh3. Also found to favor mono-amination was K2RuO4 admixed with about 5 moles/mole PPh3. For these ruthenium-based systems, the selectivity preference progresses smoothly from mono- to di-amination as the amount of PPh3 is decreased. In addition to the above listed ruthenium complexes other catalysts which are expected to favor mono-amination include: K2RuC16. K2RuCl5, RuCl2(DMSO)4, 11Ruthenium Red" (ammoniated ruthenium oxychloride), anhydrous RuC13, etc., each in admixture or molecular association with triphenylphosphine. In general. based on observations, it can be stated that triarylphosphines substituted in the para position behave quite similarly to unsubstituted triphenylphosphine in admixture or in chemical combination with the listed ruthenium catalytic compounds. Those with ortho substituents show decreased rates of reaction with the selectivity tending toward diamination. The situation is more complex in the case of mixed aryl-alkylphosphines. including the potentially chelating diphosphines, bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (DPPM) and bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (DPPE). Also included in this category are triphenylphosphite and tri-isopropylphosphine. However, in most cases, it was observed that mono-amination is favored over di-amination by the addition of organic phosphine ligand as compared to the catalytic reaction in the absence of phosphine. As indicated by the listed examples. the organic phosphine compound may be initially introduced into the reaction medium as a separate component or in a form chemically combined with the platinum group metal catalyst. The organic phosphine compound or complex preferably is one corresponding to the formula PR1 R2 R3 wherein R1 and R2 are each hydrogen or an alkyl or aryl hydrocarbyl group and R3 is a hydrocarbyl group; each said hydrocarbyl group separately containing up to 12 carbon atoms. Di-amination is selectively favored by RuC13.xH2O xH2O (phosphine-free), and by IrC13.xH2O xH2O (phosphine-free) or in admixture with triphenylphosphine, as well as by phosphine-free ruthenium mixtures and complexes such as: K2((RuCl5)20), Ru(NO)C13, K2RuC15, K2RuCl6. RuCl2(DMSO)4, and "Ruthenium Red", in the absence of mixed or chemically associated phosphines. The catalysts employed in practice of the invention, without being bound to any particular theory, apparently function as homogeneous catalysts, since they are at least partially dissolved in the reaction medium. As a result, such catalysts obtain more selective product distribution than that obtained using heterogeneous catalysts Moreover. catalyst modifiers, such as the triphenylphosphine in the instant case, have a marked effect on the activity of homogeneous catalysts. Thus, by the practice of the present invention, the selective manufacture of desired alkanolamines or of the desired di-amines is made possible utilizing readily available and relatively low toxicity starting materials. Furthermore. the desired products are readily obtained under relatively mild operating conditions, preferably at autogenous pressure, and temperatures in the range of 50 to 2000C, preferably at 110 to 1600C; without requiring addition of hydrogen to the system, although hydrogen may be employed, if desired. The exact composition and structure of the active catalyst species promoting the reaction is not clear, since the form in which the catalyst is introduced may function merely as a precursor to the active structure formed in the medium under reaction conditions. While carbonyl complexes have been observed in reaction mixtures. the use of isolated neutral carbonyl complexes of ruthenium as such catalyst precursors were found to lead to lower catalytic activity. Among other active catalysts favoring di-amination, good results are obtained with IrH(Cl)2(PPh3)3. Iridium carbonyl complexes. like the ruthenium carbonyl complexes. show decreased overall activity. Surprisingly, however, IrH2Cl(PPh)3 showed relatively low overall activity. but favored di-amination. The process of the invention may be carried out in the presence of added solvents or diluents. among which are preferred; N-methylpyrrolidinone, N,N-dimethylacetamide, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), water, 1,2-dimethoxyethane. While on the basis of prior art disclosures, it was expected that ruthenium and rhodium-based catalysts would show similar behavior in the promotion of amination reactions, it was unexpectedly found in preliminary experiments that this was not the case in reactions of diols with secondary amines. A number of exploratory runs were made including (a) reaction of pyrrolidine with methanol over the prior art RhH(PPh3)4 catalyst; (b) reaction of pyrrolidine with ethylene glycol over the same rhodium complex and (c) over RuC12(PPh3)3. These runs and all of the runs hereinafter reported were carried out under nitrogen atmosphere. The GC analyses were performed using a copper column with 15% Carbowax 20M on Gaschrom Q as the stationary phase. All reaction vessels were charged in a glove box under an inert (N2) atmosphere. EXAMPLE A A solution of 6.0 ml pyrrolidine (5.lg) in 50.0 ml methanol was prepared. A small flask equipped with a septum sealed side arm was charged with with 0.27g RhH(PPh3)4 (2.3 x 10 4 mol) and fitted with a reflux condenser. To this flask was added 3.5 ml (ca 5 x 10 3 mol pyrrolidine) of the above solution. The mixture was refluxed by placing in a previously heated oil bath. The reaction was monitored periodically by GC, with N-methylpyrrolidine being observed. After five hours the reaction was stopped. At no time was a homogeneous solution obtained. GC analysis revealed 45% conversion with 96% selectivity to the formation of N-methylpyrrolidine. The foregoing run was made in accordance with the work reported by Grigg, et al. in the J.C.S. Chem. Comm. cited above, in which RhH(PPh3)4 is stated to be the most active catalyst among the several transition metal phosphine complexes used in the amination of alcohols. It was confirmed by the run made in this example (A) that the rhodium catalyst employed does show some activity for amination at low temperature (refluxing methanol -650C). EXAMPLE B This run was carried out to test the activity of RhH(PPh3)4 as a catalyst for amination of ethylene glycol. A 22 ml Parr vessel was charged with 0.15g RhH(PPh3)4 (1.3 x 10 4 mol). 5.0 ml ethylene glycol and 1.0 ml pyrrolidine (0.85g, 1.2 x 10-2 mol). The vessel was placed in a hot oil bath (180"C) and the contents were stirred magnetically for six hours. During this time the pressure rose to 75 psig. Upon cooling to room temperature, the pressure fell to 21 psig. The reactor was opened to reveal a deep red solution and black solid. GC analysis showed a large number of low retention time peaks, one of which had the same retention time as pyrrolidine. Smaller peaks were also seen corresponding to retention times of N-(R-hydroxyethyl)pyrrolidine and 1,2 bis(pyrrolidino)ethane. The latter was observed as a shoulder on the large ethylene glycol peak. Unidentified higher boiling compounds were also present. The foregoing experiments (Example B) indicate that these rhodium complexes have some activity at higher temperature ( > 1500C) in the promotion of the amination reaction, giving a mixture of products, including minor amounts of N-(ss-hydroxyethyl) pyrrolidine and 1,2 bis(pyrrolidino)ethane. The difference in behavior of the catalyst in amination of glycol as compared to its observed activity in amination of methanol could not be satisfactorily explained, although various theories could be advanced based on considerations of likely mechanisms for amination of alcohols. EXAMPLE C Under the same conditions (120-1250C) reported in operating Example 1 (below) a run was carried out using as catalyst RhCl3e3H2O (43% Rh) admixed with 3 moles PPh3 per mole Rh. in the amination of ethylene glycol by reaction with morpholine. The overall conversion to aminated products was 27% with 23% selectivity in the production Of hydroxyethylmorpholine and 42% selectivity in the production of bis(morpholino)ethane. EXAMPLE D Under conditions substantially similar to Example B, but using RuCl2(PPh3)3 at that temperature (180 C), large amounts of N-(B-hydroxyethyl)pyrrolidine and smaller amounts of 1.2 bis(pyrrolidino)ethane were obtained from the reaction of ethylene glycol with pyrrolidine. Following the procedure of Example B, 0.12g RuC12(PPh3)3 (1.3 x 10 4 mol) was employed in lieu of the rhodium catalyst. In this case, the reactor pressure at room temperature was 63 psig at the end of the reaction. The reaction mixture was a dark yellow color with a black solid also evident. GC analysis showed a large amount (60% yield) of N-(8-hydroxyethyl)pyrrolidine and some 1,2-bis pyrrolidino-ethane to be present. -This was confirmed by GC-MS, which also showed small amounts of N-methyl- and N-ethylpyrrolidine to be present in the reaction products. No pyrrolidine was observed, although some benzene was present. In a separate run, the gases were collected and analyzed: hydrogen was found to be a major component. Subsequent experiments using the ruthenium complex catalyst showed the advantages obtained when using lower reaction temperature in the range of 100-1250C. These lower temperature runs, reported in Tables 1 to 4 below and as indicated in Table 5, were made with the indicated catalysts using the procedures outlined above. In these runs the reactions at 1200C were carried out in a 22 ml Parr stainless steel pressure vessel while the reactions at 1000 and 1l00C with liquid sampling using the glassware described in Example A. Quantitation was by the internal standard method with l-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone added as the reference. Liquid amines were added directly to the reaction vessel while gaseous amines were first dissolved in ethylene glycol or other diol to form a solution of known concentration, of which a known volume was charged to the reaction vessel. OPERATING EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1 A series of experimental runs were carried out with various diols and different secondary amines at a reaction temperature of 120-1250C for 2-2.5 hours. The amine concentration in each of the runs was about 1.8 M and the catalyst concentration about 2 x 10 2M. The reactants and catalysts employed in these runs are set out in Table 1. wherein the reactants are designated by: EG = ethylene glycol. PRDIOL = propanediol, MOR = morpholine, DMA = dimethylamine, DEA = diethylamine, DIPA = di-isopropylamine. Total selectivity (selec) is defined as Ym + Yd Conversion x 100S, where Ym ¯ yield of mono-aminated product(s) and Yd = yield of diaminated product; r = Yd Ym + Yd Table 1 Conver- Total Run sion Selec No. Amine Diol Catalyst S S r 1 MOR EG RuC12(PPh3)3 100 92 0.09 2 DMA EG RuCl2(PPh3)3 100 85 0.04 3 DMA 1.2 PRDIOL RuC12(PPh3)3 67 95 0.06 4 DMA 1.3 PRDIOL RuC12(PPh3)3 85 66 0.01 5 DIPA EG RuC12(PPh3)3 20 100 0 6 MOR EG RuC13 . xH2O 100 96 0.83 7 DMA EG RuC13 . xH2O ca 90 > 90 0.89 8 DMA 1.2-PRDIOL RuCl3 . xH2O 41 81 0.39 9 DMA 1,3-PRDIOL RuCl3 xH2O 70 51 0.88 10 MOR EG IrCl3 + 3PPh3 79 90 0.89 11 DMA EG IrCl3 + 3PPh3 76 72 0.87 12 DMA 1,2-PRDIOL IrCl3 + 3PPh3 36 66 0.36 13 DMA 1,3-PRDIOL IrCl3 + 3PPh3 45 43 0.93 14 DEA EG RuC12(PPh3)2 98 92 0.01 15 DEA EG RuCl3.xH2O 42 98 0.85 EXAMPLE 2 Another series of runs was carried out under conditions of Example 1 to determine the effect of the triphenylphosphine to ruthenium ratio (P:Ru) on the reaction of ethylene glycol with morpholine, catalyzed by mixtures of RuC13.xH2O with PPh3. The results are reported in Table 2. Table 2 Total Conversion Selectivity Run P:Ru % r % 14 0 60 .91 82 15 0 100 .83 95 16 0 100 .83 96 17 0.5 53 .53- 91 18 1.0 79 .22 90 19 3.0 95 .05 91 As seen from the above-tabulated results, by the judicious use of triphenylphosphine as catalyst modifier with ruthenium complexes, selectivity of the reaction can be altered to obtain high conversion to (i) mono-aminated or (ii) di-aminated products. as represented by the equations: HOCH2CH2OH + HNR2 4 HOCH2CH2NR2 + H20 (i) or HOCH2CH2OH + 2HNR2 4 R2NCH2CH2NR2 + 2H20 (ii) in which -NR2 is the same as that defined under the Detailed Description. EXAMPLE 3 Another series of runs was carried out in the amination of ethylene glycol with various secondary amines in the presence of RuC12(PPh3)3 as the added catalyst at 1200C. These runs were made using 5 ml of glycol to 0.011-0.012 mol. amine and 1 mol% Ru (based on amine). The results are tabulated in Table 3. Table 3 Amine pyrrolidine morpholine dimethylamine Time (hr) 6 2 3 Conv. (%) 100 100 100 Selectivity (S) R2NCH2CH2OH 79 83 81 R2NCH2CH2NR2 (observed) 9 4 It will be seen from Table 3 that high conversion is obtained with the ruthenium catalyst at moderate temperature, and unexpectedly high selectivity to substituted ethanolamines. Some increase in pressure was noted in the runs at 1200C, but these increases amounted to only about 15 psig (at 250C) in a 22 ml Parr vessel. In contrast, higher temperature runs led to net pressure increases of 60-70 psig. Thus. the lower temperature apparently prevents hydrogen loss from the reaction system--an observation consistent with higher selectivity to the simple amination products at the lower temperatures. The effect of varying the starting Ru complex on product distributions is shown in Table 4. These runs were made using ethylene glycol with morpholine as the secondary amine; 5 ml of glycol were used per gram of morpholine (=.0115 mol) and 1 mol% Ru (based on morpholine). Table 4 RuCl2. RuHCL RuCl3. xH O RuCl Complex (PPh23)3 (PPh3)3 2 3 2 (PPh3)3 (PPh3)3 + (PPh3)3 3xH28 Time (hr) 6 5.5 2 2 Temp ( C) 100. 100 120 120 Conv (%) 89 94 95 100 Selec (%): R2NCH2CH2OH 94 90 88 15 R2NCH2CH2NR2 3 2 2 80 EXAMPLE 4 While in the previous examples the secondary amine employed was free of other functional groups. the invention is also applicable to functionally substituted secondary amines. The procedure described in Example 3 was employed using N,N,N' - trimethylethylenediamine as the secondary amine. The reaction product was analyzed by gas-liquid chromatography and was found that 2-[ [2- (dimethylamino)ethyl]methylamino]ethanol had been formed in 91t yield, in a 2.5 hour operation. EXAMPLE 5 While the reactions in accordance with the invention do not require the presence of added hydrogen, it may be desired in some instances to carry out the process in the presence of hydrogen. The procedure described in Example 3 was employed in the amination of ethylene glycol with morpholine as the secondary amine. The reaction vessel was charged with hydrogen (at 250C) to a pressure of 50 psig (=4.55 Kg/cm2). After heating the contents of the reactor at 1250C for 2.5 hours. the vessel was cooled and vented. Analysis by gas-liquid chromatography showed 60X conversion of the morpholine to N-2-(hydroxyethyl)morpholine (63% selectivity) and 1,2-bis(morpholino)ethane (30% selectivity). From the foregoing run it will be seen that the presence of hydrogen leads to a retardation of the reaction rate as well as to alteration of reaction selectivity. Thus. the ratio in this instance was r=0.32, as compared to r-0.09 in Run No. 1 of Table 1. A number of runs were carried out to determine the effect of various phosphine additives on RuC13.xH2O catalyzed reactions of morpholine with ethylene glycol. The conditions employed were substantially the same as used in Example 1, unless otherwise indicated. The results are reported in Table 5. Table 5 Temp Time Conv. Total L L:Ru (OC) hrs. (%) Selec(t) r P(p-C6H4F)3 3.0 120 2.5 100 95 < 0.01 P(Ph)Me2 3.0 125 2.5 100 88 0.08 P(p-tol)3 2.9 128 2.25 100 93 0.17 P(C6F5)3 2.5 120 3 22 60 > 0.6 P(OPh)3 3.2 125 2.5 13 48 0.69 DPPM 1 120 2 70 91 0.73 PPh2Me 3.0 125 2.5 45 88 0.73 P(i-Pr)3 3.8 120 2.5 12 44 0.75 DPPE 1 125 2 13 57 0.82 PPh(C6F5 6 2 3.6 117 3 100 84 0.84 P(o-C6H4NMe2) 2.7 120 2 37 90 0.94 P(o-tol)3 2.9 130 2.5 48 85 0.95 Me = methyl; Ph = phenyl; tol = tolyl; DPPM = bis (diphenylphosphino)methane DPPE = bis (diphenylphosphino)ethane. For the purposes of this disclosure, ruthenium based catalyst systems are considered to be di-amination catalysts if they give values of r for a given reaction comparable to or larger than the value of r obtained for that reaction using RuC13.xH,O alone. Other runs made under the reported conditions gave the results shown in Table 6. Table 6 Total Catalyst Conv. r Selectivity t(MePh2P)3Ru(p-Cl)3Ru(MePh2Pl] 100 0.63 97 ((Me2PhP)3Ru(ii-C1)3Ru(Me2PhP) 100 0.15 89 EXAMPLE 7 To determine the effect of added phosphine compound to iridium catalyst, a run was carried out using IrC13. xH2O in the absence of phosphine or other catalyst modifier, under conditions employed in Example 1 above. In the reaction of morpholine with ethylene glycol at 20% conversion of the morpholine. hydroxylethylmorpholine was obtained at 103 selectivity and 1.2-bis(morpholino)ethane at 56% selectivity. The results obtained in the same reaction with 3 moles PPh3 added per mole of Irk13 is reported in Table 1, Run No. 10. In the presence of PPh3 higher overall conversion is obtained with the iridium catalyst and considerably higher selectivity (90%) to di-amination. Attempts were made to aminate ethylene glycol with methylamine and with ammonia. Very little activity was seen as compared to the use of secondary amine as reactant. The little activity that was observed led to cyclic products (eq III) and only trace amounts of N-methylethanolamine. HOCH2CH2OH + H2NCH3 4 H3 EMI18.1 The use of ammonia-was even less successful, with no amination products being observed. In fact, the addition of NH to a solution in which morpholine amination of ethylene glycol was being catalyzed, was found to poison the catalysis of the amination reaction and to lead away from the desired production of ethanolamine and/or ethylenediamine. While in the illustrative operating examples employing phosphine as a catalyst modifier, the ratio of P:Ru is up to about 3:1, the invention is not limited thereto. Good results have been obtained at P:Ru ratios up to 5:1, and while no special benefits are known to be obtained thereby, higher P:Ru ratios as up to about 10:1 may be employed.

Claims: What is claimed: 1. In the amination of an alkanediol with a secondary amine in the presence of a platinum group catalyst, the method of selectively controlling the relative extent of (A) mono-amination and (B) diamination of said dial, which comprises: effecting said amination at a.temperature in the range of 50 to 200"C in the presence of catalyst comprising a ruthenium or iridium metal complex wherein said catalyst is provided by the introduction of (A) a compound or complex of ruthenium in chemical combination or in admixture with a catalyst modifier consisting essentially of an organic phosphine selected from the group consisting of P(Ph)3, P(p-C6H4F)3, P(Ph)Me2, P(p-tol)3, P(C6F5)3, P(OPh)3, DPPM, PPh2Me, P(i-Pr)3, DPPE and mixtures thereof to selectively favor mono-amination: or as (B) a catalyst selected from the group consisting of (1) a ruthenium compound or complex in the absence of Wiyst modifier, (2) an iridi cortip complex free of modifier or in admixture or in chemical combination with an organic phosphine modifier, and (3) a ruthenium compound in admixture or in chemical combination or admixture with a catalyst modifier consisting essentially of an organic phosphine selected from the group consisting of PPh(C6F5)2, EMI19.1 P(o-C6H4NMe2), P-(o-tol)3 and mixture therof, to selectively favor di-amination. 2. The method as defined in Claim 1 wherein said organic phosphine is a compound of the formula PR 1R2R3 wherein R1 and R2 are each H or an alkyl or aryl hydrocarbyl group and R3 is a hydrocarbyl group; each said hydrocarbyl group separately containing up to 12 carbon atoms. 3. The method as defined in Claim 2 favoring mono-amination. wherein said ruthenium catalyst is selected from the group consisting of: (1) RuC12(PPh3)3, RuHCl(PPh3)3; and (2) the following compounds in admixture with PPh :(Ru(NH3)6C13' K2((RuC15)20), Ru(NO)C13, K2RuC15, R2RuC16, (Ru(NH3)6)Cl2 and K2RuO4. 4. The method as defined in Claim 2 favoring mono-amination, wherein said ruthenium catalyst is a compound from the group consisting of: (Ru(NH3) 6C13, K2((RuCl5)20, Ru(NO)C13. K2RuC15, K2RuC16, and (Ru(NH3)6)C12. each admixed with about 3 moles of triphenylphosphine per mole of ruthenium compound. 5. The method as defined in Claim 1 wherein said catalyst favoring di-amination is selected from the group consisting of phosphine free RuC13.xH2O and IrCl3.xH2O. 6. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said catalyst favoring di-amination is IrC13-xH2O in chemical combination or in admixture with triphenyl phosphine. 7. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said amination is effected at a temperature in the range of 80 to 1600C. 8. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said amination is effected in the absence of added hydrogen and at autogenous pressure. 9. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said amination is carried out in the presence of added hydrogen at superatmospheric pressure. 10. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said diol is ethylene glycol. 11. The method as defined in Claim 10 wherein said secondary amine is morpholine. 12. The method as defined in Claim 10 wherein said secondary amine is dimethylamine or diethylamine. 13. The method as defined in Claim 10 wherein said secondary amine is di-isopropylamine. 14. The method as defined in Claim 8 wherein said secondary amine is N.N.N' - trimethylethylenediamine. 15. The method is defined in Claim 8 wherein said secondary amine is pyrrolidine. 16. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said diol is 1,2-propanediol or 1,3-propanediol. 17. The method as defined in Claim 16 wherein said secondary amine is dimethylamine. 18. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said catalyst is RuC12(PPh3)3, said secondary amine is selected from the group consisting of dimethylamine, diethylamine and morpholine and said alkanediol is selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol. and propanediol. 19. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said catalyst is RuC13.x H2O, said secondary amine is selected from the group consisting of morpholine and dimethylamine and said alkanediol is selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol and propanediol. 20. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said catalyst is IrC13.xH2O admixed with triphenyl phosphine in 1:3 molar ratio, said secondary amine is selected from the group consisting of dimethylamine and morpholine, and said alkanediol is selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol and propanediol. 21. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said amination is carried out in liquid phase. 22. The method as defined in Claim 21 wherein said amination is carried out with the secondary amine dissolved in the diol at an amine concentration of about 1.8 molar and at a dissolved catalyst concentration of about one-hundredth that of the amine. 23. The method as defined in Claim 21 wherein the catalyst is dissolved in the liquid reaction medium. 24. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said catalyst is provided by introduction into the reaction medium of a compound or complex of rutheniun in chemical combination or in admixture with P(p-C6H4F)3. 25. The method as defined in Claim z wherein said catalyst is provided by introduction into the reaction medium of a compound or complex of ruthenium in chemical combination or in admixture with P(Ph)Me2. 26. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said catalyst is provided by introduction into the reaction medium of a compound or complex of ruthenium in chemical combination or in admixture with P(p-tol)3. 27. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said catalyst is provided by introduction into the tion medium of a compound or complex of ruthenium in chemical combination or in admixture with bis- (diphenylphosphino)methane. 28. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said catalyst is provided by introduction into the reaction medium of a compound or complex of ruthenium in chemical-combination or in admixture with PPh2Me. 29. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said catalyst is provided by introduction into the reaction medium of a compound or complex of ruthenium in chemical combination or in admixture with PPh(C6F5)2. 30. The method as defined in Claim 2 wherein said catalyst is provided by introduction into the reaction medium of a compound or complex of ruthenium in chemical combination or in admixture with P(o-to.1)3.

Inventors: MARSELLA, JOHN ANTHONY
Applicants: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
Application year: 1985
Main classification: C07C85
IPC codes: B01J31, C07D295, C07B61, C07C67, C07C211, C07C215, C07C213, C07C209