PROCESS TO PRODUCE A STABLE COAL TAR-CONTAINING SHAMPOO

Abstract: A novel process for producing a new and improved coal tar shampoo which permits consistent replication at a preselected pH and is capable of retaining its clarity, color and preselected viscosity for an extended time period. The process is predicated upon a fatty acid diethanolamide to cocamidopropyl betaine (Fatty Acid DEA:CAPB) ratio of the range of 1.3-2.6:1, deliberate preblending of Fatty Acid DEA with preservative and fragrance without heat before introduction into the master batch, and early cycle neutralization to a pH of circa 7.6.

Description: Descr i p t i on Process to Produce a Stable Coal Tar-Containing Shampoo Technical Field This invention relates to a novel process for the production of a unique coal tar shampoo and more particularly to a process which enables the consistant replication of a coal tar shampoo at a given pH which has a clear, light color and is capable of maintaining its clarity and color as well as its preselected viscosity for periods well beyond the shelf-life heretofore accepted as inevitable. Bac ground Art Shampoo systems containing coal tar have heretofore been available for therapeutic use to control specified dermatological conditions such as seborrhea, psoriasis, and subacute and chronic eczematous conditions of the scalp. While such products have been well accepted as capable of achieving their stated therapeutic goals, the inability of such products to maintain a stable viscosity, color or clarity over time, i.e., an economically viable shelf life, has caused great waste and rendered the product extremely costly. Additionally, the desired pH for such preparations was exceedingly difficult to reproduce with consistancy which further increased unit costs. Another major problem of these prior products was the instabilty of their viscosity which has fallen to as low as 1700 cps upon aging, the desired viscosity for such products being in the range of 5,000 - 10,000 cps. Furthermore, aging and exposure to heat heretofore caused both the color and clarity of the prior art products to deteriorate to an appearance which was totally unacceptable to the consuming public. En toto, these problems caused such products to suffer an inordinately high number of returns. The successful resolution of the aforementioned problems found in prior art coal tar shampoo has far more significance than economic impact. Because of the aesthetically displeasing nature of low viscosity, darkened and hazy product, consumers often do not use the product as consistently as they should. In order for the consumer to realize improvement in his/her scalp conditions, he/she must use the product on a continuous basis. In contrast, a coal tar shampoo having superior viscosity, color, and clarity will promote good regimental compliance and therefore is therapeutically beneficial to the user. Thus, eliminating the problems which plagued prior coal tar shampoos will provide a product whose qualities make them pleasant to use and encourages better patient compliance. The health care industry previously addressed such shelf life problems in conventional shampoos with some degree of success. For instance, the stability of viscosity in such formulations was resolved by the additions of gums and polymers while pH reproducibi1ity was realized by the use of selected buffers. However, these traditional approaches proved unworkable in attempting to resolve the stated problems in systems containing crude coal tar as an active ingredient. Nor has any technique heretofore been devised which resolves the problems which arise with the color and clarity of coal tar-containing shampoo systems on aging. Disclosure of Invention The present invention is predicated upon the discovery of a novel and unique process for producing a clear, light colored coal tar-containing shampoo which is especially stable with respect to viscosity, color and clarity over time whereby an economically viable shelf-life is obtained and the great waste heretofore associated with such a product is eliminated. Additionally, this new process results in a product with a more consistent pH. Moreover, the product produced by the novel process of this invention retains all of the traditional therapeutic values heretofore associated with Coal Tar shampoos, that is, it is effective to control symptoms of seborrhea, dandruff, psoriasis and subacute and chronic eczematous conditions of the scalp. More particularly, the unique process hereof is predicated upon our discovery that unique and unexpected benefits are obtainable when the ratio of fatty acid diethanolamide ("Fatty Acid DEA") to cocamidopropyl betaine( "CAPB") in the coal tar shampoo formulation is strictly limited to the range of 1.3-2.6:1, the preservative and fragrance are deliberately preblended into the Fatty Acid DEA phase without heat before introduction into the master batch, and the coal tar shampoo is neutralized at the beginning of the process cycle rather than at the end as has been heretofore the common practice. Accordingly, a principal object of the present invention is to provide a new and unique process for producing an improved coal tar shampoo which results in a clear, light colored product capable on aging of maintaining its clarity, color, and viscosity. Another object of the present invention is to provide a new and unique process for producing an improved coal tar shampoo in which the ratio of fatty acid diethanolamide to cocamidopropyl betaine is maintained in the range between 1.3:1 and 2.6:1. A further object of the present invention is to provide a new and improved process for producing coal tar shampoo in which the fragrance and the preservative are preblended into the Fatty Acid DEA phase without heat before the Fatty Acid DEA blend is admixed into the master batch. Another object of the present invention is to provide a new and improved process for the manufacture of coal tar shampoo in which the coal tar extract-detergent blend is neutralized sufficiently early in the cycle to permit substantially complete equilibration thereof before the formulation is released for packaging. These and still further objects as shall hereinafter appear are readily fulfilled by the present invention in a remarkably unexpected manner as will be readily discerned from the following detailed description of an exemplary embodiment thereof. Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention The present invention is predicated upon the discovery of successful resolution of serious product problems inherent in prior art coal tar shampoos, namely, the inability of such products upon aging or the exposure to heat to retain its pleasing color and clarity, and viscosity standards characteristic of freshly bottled product, and the ability to attain consistently a pre-selected pH during manufacture. In attempting to resolve the prior art problems, it was learned that the sequence of introducing one or more of the several integral components of the shampoo is critical and that an equally critical relationship exists vis-a-vis the ratio of Fatty Acid DEA to CAPB. Fatty acid di ethanolamides have heretofore been suggested for use in shampoo formulations mainly as foam boosting and viscosity building agents. However, there was no suggestion in the prior art that a critical relationship might exist between the fatty acid diethanolamide and CAPB which could enhance shampoo stability. The level of fatty acid DEA, in accordance with this invention, will generally lie in the range of from about 3% to about 5% by weight based on the total weight of the composition. The level of CAPB will ordinarily be employed at concentrations in the range of from about 1% to about 4% on the same basis. The specific levels of each compound is to be selected such that the ratio fatty acid DEA/CAPB is within the range of 1.3:1 to 2.6:1. The fatty acid DEA may be selected from those commercially available products where the fatty acid derivative is lauric, myristic, oleic, palmitic, stearic, tall oil or coconut. In the preferred form of this invention, optimum results are achieved by using the coconut fatty acid derivative or the lauric acid derivative. One practice of the present invention wherein a coal tar shampoo is produced having all of the desired properties stated above while avoiding the costly and vexatious problems which plagued the prior art products will now be described. First, a homogenous particulate-free solution is prepared containing sodium lauryl ether sulfate ("SLES"), coal tar extract and purified water USP (hereinafter referred to as "Solution I"). Next, to be used as hereafter described, discrete solutions of anhydrous citric acid USP and sodium chloride are prepared (Solutions II and III, respectively). Next a mixture of Fatty Acid DEA, methylparaben and propylparaben is blended together until the parabens are completely dissolved. Then the desired fragrance compound is added to the Fatty Acid DEA-paraben blend and thoroughly mixed therewith (Solution IV). This solution is covered and held • until needed as will be later described. To complete the manufacture of the new and improved coal-tar shampoo hereof, the coal tar extract-SLES solution (I) is placed in a batch mixing tank of adequate dimensions in which the mixer is running at moderate speed. Next the following ingredients are introduced one-at-a-time with continuous mixing to assure that the ingredient just added is totally dissolved before the subsequent ingredient is introduced: Tetrasodium EDTA; imidazolidinyl urea; citric acid solution (II); cocamidropropyl betaine ("CAPD"); and Fatty Acid DEA-paraben-fragrance solution (IV). Note that the ratio (by weight) of Fatty Acid DEA in Solution IV to CAPD must be between 1.3:1 and 2.6:1 if the full benefits of this invention are to be realized. After producing the aforesaid mixture, the pH of the batch is measured using conventional techniques and such additional citric acid solution (Solution II) is added as is needed to bring the pH to 7.6. Finally, the viscosity is measured in cps using conventional techniques and sufficient sodium chloride solution (Solution III) is added qs to provide a reading of 8000 cps. Both the citric acid and sodium chloride solutions are added using conventional techniques, i.e., only a portion, for instance 75%, of the theoretically required amount of reagent is added and mixed. Another reading is then taken and the procedure repeated until the desired value is reached. By following the procedure of adding only a portion of the stoichiommetric required adjustment, the overrunning of the desired limit is avoided. The batch is now ready for packaging into containers of any desired size using conventional sterile fill equipment. To further illustrate the practice of the present invention, and not by way of limitation, the following examples are presented. EXAMPLE I A batch of coal tar shampoo is prepared to provide 3785 liters of finished product. A base solution is prepared by introducing 1,495.5 kg of sodium lauryl ether sulfate to an adequately sized stainless steel mixing tank and, with medium agitation, 81.5 kg of coal tar extract is added thereto and mixed until homogenous. 2,046.7 kg of purified water USP is thereafter introduced and agitation is continued until homogenity is obtained. The homogeneous solution is then filtered to remove unwanted particulate therefrom to provide 3,623.7 kg of Coal tar extract-SLES solution. A citric acid solution is prepared in a separate stainless steel vessel of appropriate size by mixing equal 6.8 kg of anhydrous citric acid USP with 6.8 kg of purified water USP and solubilizing with a propeller mixer. This solution is then held until needed as hereinafter indicted. A sodium chloride solution is prepared in a separate stainless steel vessel of appropriate size by mixing approximately 25% by weight of sodium chloride and approximately 75% by weight of purified water USP until all of the sodium chloride is dissolved and holding the resulting solution until needed as hereinafter indicated. A solution of coconut fatty acid diethanolamide ("Coconut fatty acid DEA") is prepared by introducing 148.8 kg of coconut fatty acid DEA into an appropriately sized stainless steel container equipped with a mixer and thereafter adding 7.7 kg of methylparaben USP and 2.0 kg of propylparaben USP thereinto until the parabens are completely dissolved. Thereafter, 38.6 kg of a suitable fragrance compound is added thereto and mixed until it too is completely dissolved whereupon the vessel is covered and held for addition to the main batch as hereafter indicated. The shampoo formulation is completed by placing the coal tar extract-SLES solution into the batch mixing tank. With the mixer running at moderate speed, the following ingredients are introduced discretely with dissolution or thorough mixing of the added ingredient being assured before the next ingredient in introduced. The first ingredient introduced into the 3,623.7 kg of coal tar extract-SLES solution is 1.2 kg of Tetrasodium EDTA (Technical grade). Thereafter, 19.3 kg of imidazolidinyl urea is added and thoroughly mixed. 7.0 kg of the citric acid solution is then added followed by 58.0 kg of cocamidopropyl Betaine. After the betaine is thoroughly mixed into the batch, 197.0 kg of the coconut fatty acid DEA-paraben-fragrance solution is transferred from the covered vessel into the batch tank and it too is thoroughly mixed therewith. Thereafter, the pH of the batch having attained reasonable equilibration, the pH is measured using conventional quality control techniques. Additional citric acid solution is then mixed therewith to the extent required to bring the batch pH to 7.6. Thereafter, an amount of sodium chloride solution is mixed qs into the batch in an amount sufficient to provide the batch with a viscosity of 8,000 cps using standard measuring techniques. The batch is' ready for packaging. EXAMPLE II Several specimens of product produced according to Example I were compared with prior art product to determine stability of clarity when subjected to storage at 40°C (see Table A) and 50°C (see Table B) . The specimens were checked periodically for haziness and clouding. The age of the specimen when haziness was first observed was recorded. As apparent from the data, samples prepared in accordance with the present invention endured a significantly longer period before exhibiting cloudiness. Thus, at 40°, the product of the present disclosure lasted an average of 4.7 months before clouding occurred in contrast to the 1.5 month average attained by the prior art product. At 50°C, product prepared by the present invention averaged 2.1 months before clouding whereas the prior art product averaged 1.4 months. The ability to retain clarity is an important attribute to the maintenance of cosmetic appeal and salable shelf life. TABLE A Clarity Stability After Storage at 40°C Lot. No. Prior Art Method Disclosure Method 1001 Two months 1002 One month 1003 One month 1004 Two months 2001 Five months 2002 Six months 2003 Three months 2004 Five months 2005 Five months 2006 Four months 2007 Five months Average 1.5 months 4.7 months * * * TABLE B Clarity Stability After Storage at 50°C Lot. No. Prior Art Method Disclosure Method 1001 One month 1002 One month 1003 One month 1004 Two months 1005 Two months 2001 Two months 2002 Three months 2003 Two months 2004 Two months 2005 Two months 2006 Two months 2007 Two months Average 1.4 months 2.1 months EXAMPLE III Several specimens of product produced according to the present disclosure were obtained for comparative color stability testing against a like number of specimens of prior art product. One half of the specimens were stored at 40°C (see Table C) and one half of the specimens were stored at 50°C (see Table D) . Each specimen was measured at two week intervals to obtain Absorbance readings at 700 nm, the readings representing spectrophotometric measurements of darkness using standard measuring techniques, in which the larger numbers indicate a darker color. As is apparent from the data, the prior art product darkened an average of 0.436 absorbance units after 12 weeks at 40°C and by an average of 1-.282 units after 12 weeks at 50°C. Product of the present invention, on the other hand, darkened only 0.132 units after 12 weeks at 40°C and only 0.267 units after 12 weeks at 50°C. TABLE C Stability of Color Measurement after Storage at 40°C. Prior Art Samples Disclosure Samples Period 1001 1002 1005 2001 2003 2005 Initial 0.059 0.077 0.070 0.072 0.074 0.073 2 weeks 0.094 0.135 0.152 0.106 4 weeks 0.104 0.160 0.109 0.106 0.123 6 weeks 0.126 0.174 0.134 0.125 8 weeks 0.166 0.193 0.155 0.146 0.177 10 weeks 0.202 12 weeks 0.216 0.139 1.023 0.189 0.227 0.198 CHANGE 0.216 0.139 0.953 0.117 0.153 0.125 Average change 0.436 0.132 TABLE D Stability of Color Measurement after Storage at 50°C. Prior Art Samples Disclosure Samples P er i od 1001 1002 1005 2001 2003 2005 In i t i a l 0 . 059 0.077 0.070 0.072 0.074 0.073 2 weeks 0 . 117 0.179 0.133 0.175 0.122 4 weeks 0 .146 0.193 0.164 0.145 0.231 0.143 6 weeks 0 . 189 0.223 0.263 0.242 0.195 8 weeks 0 . 217 0.221 0.387 0.246 0.288 0.226 10 weeks 0 . 352 1.058 0.318 0.319 0.272 12 weeks 0 . 781 1.679 1.594 0.337 0.356 0.327 CHANGE 0 . 722 1.602 1.524 0.265 0.282 0.254 Average change 1.282 0.267 EXAMPLE IV Specimens of product prepared according to the present invention were compared with a like number of prior art specimens (i.e., product produced by prior methodology) to determine viscosity stability over an extended period of time. Product was stored at room temperature and viscosity was measured in cps using standard techniques for measuring viscosity. As shown in Table E, the prior art product lost from 2930 up to 5129 cps of viscosity over an eighteen month period whereas product produced according to the present disclosure not only did not lose any of its viscosity, it increased slightly instead. TABLE E Stability of Viscosity after Storage at room temperature (Viscosity measured at 25°C.) Prior Art Samples Disclosure Samples Period 1003 1001 1006 2004 2003 2001 Ini t ial 6250 4350 6533 9100 8767 9232 4 months 4165 3147 4900 9300 8200 11000 12 months 1547 1520 3500 10300 11067 12967 18 months 1130 1420 2500 9833 11200 13000 CHANGE -5129 -2930 -4033 + 733 +2433 +3767 EXAMPLE V Several batches of coal tar extract shampoo were prepared using both prior art methodology and the process of the present invention. Upon completion of formulation and prior to packaging, each batch was measured for pH using conventional methodology to determine its ease of replication. As shown in Table F, the prior art process obtained a standard deviation of 0.23 whereas the process of the present invention had a standard deviation of 0.10. TABLE F Initial pH Value After Manufacture Lot No. Prior Art Method Disclosure Method 1001 7.18 11000077 6.67 1008 7.13 1003 7.05 1005 7.23 1009 6.96 1010 7.39 2008 7, 66 2009 7 71 2010 7, 50 2004 7 47 2005 7.67 2006 7 69 Standard Deviation 0.23 0.10 EXAMPLE VI A coal tar extract shampoo was prepared using the method of Example I with solutions having the following composition: Solution I Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate 41 .12% Coal Tar Extract 4 .51% POE (20) Sorbitan Monolaurate 5 .10% Purified Water, USP 49 .27% Solution II Ci trie Acid 50% Purified Water, USP 50% Solution III Sodium Chloride 25% Purified Water, USP 75% Solution IV Lauric Acid DEA 74. 26% Methylparaben, USP 3. 96% Propylparaben, USP 1. 98% Fragrance Compound 19. 80% Solution V Solution I 88. 27% Solution II 0. 15% EDTA 0. 03 Imidazol idinyl Urea 0. 5 % Cocoamidopropyl Betaine 2. 85% Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate (86%) 3.0% Solution IV 5.05% Solution III qs The product produced thereby was tested and found to possess all of the properties demonstrated in Examples II, III, IV, and V. EXAMPLE VII A coal tar extract shampoo was prepared using the method of Example I with solutions having the following composition: Solution I Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate 40.00% Coal Tar Extract 2.00% Purified Water, USP 58.00% Solution II Citric Acid 50% Purified Water, USP 50% Solution III Sodium Chloride 25% Purified Water, USP 75% Solution IV Coconut Fatty Acid DEA 80.25% Methylparaben, USP 4.93% Propylparaben, USP 2.47% Fragrance Compound 12.35% Solution V Solution I 93.60% Solution II 0.15% EDTA • 0.03 Imidazol idinyl Urea 0.5 % Cocoamidopropyl Betaine 2.0 % Solution IV 4.05% Solution III qs The product produced thereby was tested and found to possess all of the properties demonstrated in Examples II, III, IV, and V. EXAMPLE VIII A coal tar extract shampoo was prepared using the method of Example I with solutions having the following composition: Solution I Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate 41.0 % Coal Tar Extract 2.25 Purified Water, USP 56.75% Solution II Citric Acid 50% Purified Water, USP 50% Solution III Sodium Chloride 25% Purified Water, USP 75% Solution IV Coconut Fatty Acid DEA 86.20% Methylparaben, USP 3.45% Propylparaben, USP 1.72% Fragrance Compound 8.62% Solution V Solution I 91.2 % Solution II 0.15% EDTA 0.03% Imidazolidinyl Urea 0.3 % Cocoamidopropyl Betaine 2.5 % Solution IV 5.8 % Solution III qs The product produced thereby was tested and found to possess all of the properties demonstrated in Examples II, III, IV, and V. EXAMPLE IX A coal tar extract shampoo was prepared using the method of Example I with solutions having the following composition: Solution I Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate 41.2 % Coal Tar Extract 2.25% Purified Water, USP 56.55% Solution II Ci tric Acid 50% Purified Water, USP 50% Solution III Sodium Chloride 25% Purified Water, USP 75% Solution IV Lauric Acid DEA 74.75% Methylparaben, USP 3.88% Propylparaben, USP 1.95% Fragrance Compound 19.42% Solution V Solution I 92.67% Solution II 0.15% EDTA 0.03 Imidazol idinyl Urea 0.5 % Cocoamidopropyl Betaine 1.5 % Solution IV 5.15% Solution III qs The product produced thereby was tested and found to possess all of the properties demonstrated in Examples II, III, IV, and V. EXAMPLE X A coal tar extract shampoo was prepared using the method of Example I with solutions having the following composition: Solution I Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate 48.0 % Coal Tar Extract 2.25% Purified Water, USP 49.75% Solution II Citric Acid 50% Purified Water, USP 50% Solution III Sodium Chloride 25% Purified Water, USP 75% Solution IV Lauric Acid DEA 69.76% Methylparaben, USP 4.66% Propylparaben, USP 2.33% Fragrance Compound 23.25% Solution V Solution I 86.0 % Solution II 0.15% EDTA 0.03 Imidazolidinyl Urea 0.5 % Cocoamidopropyl Betaine 1.25% Solution IV 4.30% Solution III qs Purified Water, USP 7.75% The product produced thereby was tested and found to possess all of the properties demonstrated in Examples II, III, IV, and V. EXAMPLE XI A coal tar extract shampoo was prepared using the method of Example I with solutions having the following composition: Solution I Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate 41.27% Coal Tar Extract 2.25% Purified Water, USP 49.75% Solution II Citric Acid 50% Purified Water, USP 50% Solution III Sodium Chloride 25% Purified Water, USP 75% Solution IV Coconut Fatty Acid DEA 74.75% Methylparaben, USP 3.88% Propylparaben, USP 1.95% Fragrance Compound 19.42% Solut ion V Solution I 92.77% Solution II 0.15% EDTA 0.03 Imidazolidinyl Urea 0.5 % Cocoamidopropyl Betaine 1.5 % Solution IV 5.15% Solution III qs The product produced thereby was tested and found to possess all of the properties demonstrated in Examples II, III, IV, and V. From the foregoing, it is apparent that methods and compositions have been herein described which fulfill all of the aforestated objectives in a remarkably unexpected fashion. It is of course understood that such modifications, alterations and adaptations as may readily occur to the artisan confronted with this disclosure are intended within the spirit of this disclosure which is limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto.

Claims: Cl a ims 1. The method of producing a coal tar-containing shampoo having stable viscosity, color and clarity comprising: premixing a plurality of discrete solutions respectively containing in weight percent a) from 40 to 48 percent particulate free sodium lauryl ether sulfate ("SLES"), from 2 to 5 percent coal tar extract and from about 47 to about 58 percent purified water USP, (herein "Solution I"); b) 50 % anyhydrous citric acid USP and 50% purified water USP, (herein "Solution II"); c) 25% sodium chloride and 75% purified water USP, (herein "Solution III"); . d) 69-81% fatty acid DEA, 4.9 to 7.4% paraben selected from the group Consisting of methylparaben, propylparaben and mixtures thereof, and from 8 to 24 percent fragrance (herein "Solution IV"); introducing by weight percent of the final formulation, from about 88 to about 94 percent of Solution I into a stainless steel mixing tank with moderate mixing; adding about 0.03 percent of tetrasodium EDTA into Solution I and mixing it thoroughly therein to form a first mixture therewith; thereafter introducing from about 0.3 to about 0.5 percent imidazolidinyl urea into said first mixture and mixing thoroughly _o form a second mixture; adding from about 0.1 to about 0.2 percent of Solution II into said second mixture to form a third mixture; admixing from about 1.2 to about 2.9 percent cocamidopropyl betaine ("CAPB") into said third mixture to form a fourth mixture having said CAPB thoroughly mixed therethrough and providing said mixture with a Fatty acid DEA :: CAPB ratio of at least 1.3:1 and not more than 2.6:1; thereafter admixing from about 4.0 to about 5.8 percent of Solution IV into and throughout said fourth mixture to form a fifth mixture; measuring the pH of said fifth mixture; adjusting the pH of said fifth mixture to 7.6; and packaging said pH adjusted fifth mixture. 2. A process according to claim 1 in which a sufficient amount of Solution II is admixed into said fourth mixture to provide a pH = 7.6. 3. A process according to claim 1 in which a sufficient amount of Solution III is admixed into said pH adjusted fifth mixture to provide said batch with a viscosity of about 8,000 cps. 4. A process according to claim 1 in which said Fatty acid DEA is selected from the group consisting of lauric, myristic, oleic, palmitic, stearic, tall oil or coconut. 5. A process according to claim 2 in which said Fatty acid DEA is selected from the group consisting of lauric, myristic, oleic, palmitic, stearic, tall oil or coconut. 6. A process according to claim 3 in which said Fatty Acid DEA is selected from the group consisting of lauric, myristic, oleic, palmitic, stearic, tall oil or coconut. 7. A process according to claim 1 in which said Fatty acid DEA is eocodiethanolamide. 8. A coal tar containing shampoo having stable viscosity, color and clarity on standing comprising: sodium lauryl ether sulfate ("SLES"), coal tar extract, anyhydrous citric acid USP, sodium chloride, Fatty acid DEA, methylparaben, propylparaben, a fragrance, tetrasodium EDTA, imidazolidinyl urea, cocamidopropyl betaine ("CAPB") and purified water in which the ratio of Fatty acid DEA to CAPB is at least 1.3:1 and not more than 2.6:1. 9. A coal tar containing shampoo having stable viscosity, color and clarity after extended storage prepared according to the process of claim 2. 10. A coal tar containing shampoo having stable viscosity, color and clarity after extended storage prepared according to the process of claim 3. 11. A coal tar containing shampoo having stable viscosity, color and clarity after extended storage prepared according to the process of claim 7. 12. A coal tar containing shampoo having stable viscosity, color and clarity on standing consisting, in weight percent of: Sodium lauryl ether sulfate 35-45 Coal tar extract 1.75-4.7 Anhydrous citric acid .05-0.1 Fatty Acid DEA 3-5 Methylparaben, USP 0.8 -3.2 Propylparaben, USP 0.2 -0.8 EDTA 0.03 Imidazolidinyl urea 0.3 -0.5 Cocoamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) 1-4 Purified Water, USP 36.67-57.65 Fragrance compound 0.32-1.4 in which the ratio of fatty acid DEA to CAPB is at least 1.3:1 and not more than 2.6:1. 13. A coal tar containing shampoo according to claim 12 in which said Fatty acid DEA is selected from the group consisting of lauric, myristic, oleic, palmitic, stearic, tall oil or coconut. 14. A coal tar containing shampoo according to claim 13 in which said fatty acid DEA is cocodiethanolamide.

Inventors: FONG JOHN, JUNGERMANN ERIC, NOUKARIKIAN VARTAN, FONG, JOHN, JUNGERMANN, ERIC, NOUKARIKIAN, VARTAN
Applicants: NEUTROGENA CORP, NEUTROGENA CORPORATION
Application year: 1985
Main classification: A61K33
IPC codes: A61K8, A61K33, A61K35, A61P17, A61Q5, C11D3