Centralized control method for a plurality of looms and apparatus

Abstract: The optimum control conditions for a plurality of looms are simply estimated with use of a trial loom. Hereby, the plurality of the looms are operated under a centralized control method. The looms, even if they vary in their peculiar characteristics, can be effectively operated by correcting standard control data for controlling the looms in response to variations of the loom characteristics. The present contralized control method can save much labor and time to improve productivity of the looms, by properly eliminating elaborate trial weaving processes.

Description: The present invention relates to a method for centralizing and controlling a plurality of looms, and more particularly to that for preparing weaving conditions by trial weaving, and storing, reading, and transferring control data bearing the weaving conditions after completing the preparation, and further means for changing contol data at need after the preparation. A monitoring system is known up to now as a system to connect many looms with a control computer. The monitoring system collects data of the rates of operations of respective looms and display them for every looms, but it does not directly control the respective looms. By contrast, upon actually operating looms, for example, air jet looms, the respective looms require many control parameters such as a number of RPM of a prime motor of the loom, a number of beatings, tension of a warp yarn, on/off timing of each nozzle, and pressure of air for weft insertion, etc. In an ordinarily weaving factory, many looms, not one loom, from several tens to several hundreds thereof are operated. Moreover, they must often weave the same products. However, provided that the same many data are then set for every looms, working efficiency is lowered and requires much times to be needed. So, a centralized control system may be profitably employed, in which a host computer is placed on the center of the factory, and control parameters previously stored in the computer are delivered to control units of respective looms only by entering a product number. Namely, with control parameters for every products stored and kept in the host central computer, a required control data in need can be immediately set to the control devices of the respective looms upon starting to weave any fabric. Then, the recent textile weaving industry intends to obtain highly value-added fabrics, and thus development for yielding new products has been increasing needed. In such a developmental process, the optimum weaving conditions must be determined ordinarily with use of one loom as a trial one while changing control conditions of looms. In the instance, a general-purpose centralized control system as described above may lower rather than raise efficiency of the trial weaving. In addition, another centralized control device for looms is conventionally known in which control data provided with symbols showing fabric specifications (a number of RPM of a prime motor of a loom, number of beatings, warp tension, and weaving density) are previously registered for every kinds of fabrics, and a required control data is delivered to all the looms to permit the looms to be automatically set by designating a symbol showing a fabric specification. In such prior devices, a data to be registered is in general an average one commonly usable for all the looms. Accordingly, provided that individual looms change in inherent characteristics thereof, the looms can not be operated respectively as desired with the average registered data. Prior arts suffer from these problems. In addition, in the prior weaving techniques, upon weaving a new fabric, only a single loom is opeated as a testing machine to estimate the optimum control condition while changing for trial weaving many control parameters such for example as a number of RPM of a prime power mover motor of a loom, a number of beatings, warp yarn tensions, on/off timing of each nozzle for weft insertion, etc. In such trial weaving, an operator first provides certain condition to a loom based on his past experiences and perception, starts weaving, evaluates the results in succession, to estimate the optimum condition with trial and error. However, such a technique requires much labor and time, as well as a great deal of skill. This is a serious obstacle in quickly supplying woven fabrics to markets based on new specifications since the markets have been recently diversified in demand. A typical control method and a processing station is disclosed in GB-A 2,015,775. A central control unit is provided to which individual work piece processing stations are connected by means of data collection lines and suitable interfaces. The central unit includes a storage medium holding the system program work piece-specific data and commands for the working or program blocks of the system program. Interactive exchange of data takes place over the data lines which, for effective controlling, does not only require high computing speed in the center unit, but also sufficient storage capacity in the storage medium, if a plurality of looms have to be operated. This results from the fact that the storage medium has to keep and receive data about the looms and their processing stations which data have also to be processed concurrently. If a large number of looms have to be operated, such system will give only slow response to varying conditions, since access times and the like become too large. Another apparatus for controlling a plurality of looms or knitting machines is disclosed in GB-A 1,591,522. Again, a common stored program is utilized for controlling said looms whereby the arrangement is such that during operation of the apparatus program information is supplied from an operating store of a host to all of the control units of the respective looms, but each control unit selects from the suppling program information only that information which is actually required. However, a specific method for optimizing parameters for weaving conditions is not disclosed in this document. US-A 4,408 447 is related to a method which is based upon a permanent cycling communication of a central unit with individual units, namely spinning units in this case. At a given instant, a single unit only is connected to the central unit of the control system, that central unit being supplied with information data about the condition of the spinning unit connected thereto while said central unit simultaneously transmits instructions for that specific spinning unit. Meanwhile the other spinning units are operated automatically on basis of stored instructions. Accordingly, since the spinning units are served one after the other by the central unit, for optimum controlling a high procesing speed is required besides a large storage medium for storing data which are related to a respective spinning unit. No optimizing method is proposed to avoid excessive efforts resulting from these computer requirements. A similar controlling mechanism is described in US-A 4,031,718, wherein a plurality of machines is controlled at preselected times during a specific cycle by a central control unit. The main purpose of the control system described herein is to operate each machine independently of the others. However, no optimizing method is disclosed. The article "Direct Numerical Control and Adaptive Control-an appraisal" by D.A. Milner and A.F. Oliver, published in Engineers Digest, volume 34 (1973), generally describes control methods which are commonly available without giving any specific hint to optimizing conditions and optimizing methods. It is the object of the present invention is to provide a centralized control method for looms and a device thereof capable of eliminating a trial weaving process requiring much labor and time and improving production efficiency. This object is achieved by a method as claimed in patent claim 1. Preferred embodiments are described in the dependent claims, in particular in claim 4. An apparatus, suitable for carrying out the inventive method, is subject-matter of patent claim 8. Thus, according to the first method of the present invention, past accumulation data are stored beforehand in a memory connected with a host computer serving to control a plurality of looms. With use of fabric specifications entered in the host computer and the past accumulation data read out of the memory, the host computer executes prescribed arithmetic operation or interpolation operation to evaluate standard set values for loom control. Moreover, according to the second method of the present invention, past accumulation data are stored beforehand in a memory connected with a host computer serving as a plurality of looms. With use of fabric specifications entered in the host computer and the past accumulation data read out of the memory, the host computer executes prescribed arithmetic operation or interpolation operation to evaluate standard set values for loom control, successively compares various operation data available from the looms starting to be operated by operation signals based on the above standard set values with a plurality of reference values entered therein and previously put in the order of priority to subject the looms to the optimal control, and corrects the above standard set values based on the compared results. In such a manner, the host computer automatically evaluates respective standard set values from past enormous actually resulting data by entering the fabric specifications therein, and then respectively delivers the standard set values to corresponding looms to effect centralized control. Accordingly, a trial weaving process can be eliminated to improve production efficiency. In addition, the evaluated standard set values are self-corrected to provide the optimum operation of the looms. Thus, the looms rapidly respond in the optimum conditions to frequent changes of kinds of fabrics including unknown fabrics due to many kinds of fabrics but with a small quantities of production. The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which preferred embodiments of the present invention are shown by way of illustrative examples. Fig. 1 is a block diagram showing a function of a first embodiment of the invention; Fig. 2 is a flowchart showing a procedure for entering fabric specifications in the host computer; Figs. 3 (a), (b), (c) and (d) are flowcharts for evaluating respective standard set values; Figs. 4 (a), (b), (c) and (d) are respectively block diagrams showing the functions corresponding to the flowcharts of Figs. 3 (a), (b), (c) and (d); Fig. 5 is a list showing a relationship among similar data read from past accumulation data; Fig. 6 is a view illustrating interpolation operation; Fig. 7 is a flowchart showing the whole of the operation of the host computer; Fig. 8 (1) and (2) are flowcharts respectively showing exemplary operations of an optimally controlled loom; Fig. 9 is a block diagram showing in detail an exemplary centralized control apparatus in the present embodiment; Fig. 10 is a block diagram of a host computer in a second embodiment; Fig. 11 is a block diagram of a terminal device; Fig. 12 is a flowchart showing operation of the host computer upon changing kinds of fabrics in a third embodiment; and Figs. 13 and 14 are timing charts of control programs by a centralized control system in the present embodiment. The embodiments concern in particular a method for quickly preparing new control data for new fabric specifications such for example as a warp yarn total number, a number of weft yarn beating times, yarn kinds, thickness, and weaving conditions, and concerns a device thereof. First, Fig. illustrates the first centralized control apparatus 1 as a functional block in relation to the present embodiment. The host computer 2 serves as a center for centralizing and controlling a plurality of looms 3. The host computer 2 has the same functions as those of set value evaluation means 23, a set value memory 24, and set value change means 27. A keyboard 7 and a display 6 such as a CRT constitutes fabric specification input means 28 for entering fabric specifications. Further, accumulation data memory 22 such as a floppy disk is connected as an external memory 9 with the host computer 2. In addition, the plurality of the looms 3, being control targets, constitute a terminal control unit 10 as a communication interface having a bidirectional data bus 4, set value transmitting means 25, and operation data receiving means 26. Then, operation of the centralized control apparatus for example in weaving a new specification fabric is described. First, watching the display 6, fabric specifications are entered interactively in the host computer with use of the keyboard 7. Fig. 2 shows a procedure for entering the fabric specifications in the computer. Fabric specification data such as kinds of warp yarns, thickness of a warp yarn, a warp yarn total number, kinds of weft yarns, weft yarn density, and weaving width are entered in succession. Entered such a fabric specifications, the host computer 2 evaluates a standard set value from past accumulation data stored in the accumulation memory. Further, basic data and similar data yielded based on past trial weaving and results available from actual weaving are assumed to be previously stored. Flowcharts illustrating the evaluation of the standard set values executed by the host computer 2 are shown in Fig. 3 , while functional blocks corresponding to the flowcharts shown in Fig. 4 . Figs. 3 (a) and 4 (a) are respectively of the flowchart and the functional block for evaluating the standard warp yarn total tension of value T. Basic data "a" of the same kind is read out from the accumulation data memory 22. Then, using a warp yarn total number N and a warp yarn denier number "D" among fabric specifications entered with use of the keyboard 7, T=a d N/1000 is operated to evaluate the warp yarn total tension set value T. Figs. 3 (b) and 4 (b) are respectively of the flowchart and the functional block for evaluating a standard pressure (fluid pressure) set value P. A plurality of relationships between weft yarn thicknesses b₁, b₂, ... and fluid pressures P₁, P₂, ... as past similar data of the same kind as that of weft yarns entered from the keyboard 7 are read out from the accumulation data memory 22 as shown in Fig. 5 . And, parameters b i , b i+1 , P i , P i+1 satisfying a relation b i <b<b i+1 for the weft yarn thicknesses entered from the keyboard 7 are estimated. With use of these parameters, interpolation operation; P=(P i+1 -P i ) (b-b i )/(b i+1 -b i )+P i is executed from a relationship shown in Fig. 6 to evaluate the standard pressure set values P. Further, Figs. 3 (c) and 4 (c) are of respectively the flowchart and the functional block for evaluating a number-of-RPM set value R. Likewise, Figs. 3 (d) and 4 (d) are of respectively the flowchart and the functional block for evaluating an on/off timing set value "t" of a nozzle. Also for these cases, using similar data read from the accumulation data memory 22, interpolation operation is executed to evaluate the respective set values. All the standard set values of various kinds so evaluated are successively transmitted to designated relevant looms 3 as standard set values via the terminal control unit 10 as a communication interface and the bidirectional data bus 4. Subsequently, Fig. 7 shows a flowchart for illustrating an evaluation process of a number of the control conditions in the order of Steps 1 to 10, in which any step number is shown in a parenthesis. Here, a decision process for deciding if the same specifications existed in the past is included in Step 3. If there existed the same one, it is read out of the accumulation data memory 22. Following the operation shown in the flowchart, the respective looms 3, after receiving an operation signal, weaves based on the standard set value. Then, operation for subjecting the looms to the optimal control will be described as follows. Data associated with respective allowable upper and lower limit reference values of for example (1) the rate of operation, (2) a number of RPM, (3) warp yarn total tension, and (4) fluid pressure are entered through the keyboard after they are put beforehand in the order of priority as optional control reference values. Here, the upper reference value of the rate of operation put in the first order of priority may be not entered. On the other hand, the respetive looms 3 (terminal device 13) starting to be operated in accordance with the respective standard set values feed back operation data via the bidirectional data bus 4 and the terminal control unit 10 as the communication interface to the host computer 2. The host computer 2 compares in succession the opeation data fed back from the loom 3 with a plurality of the optimal control reference values entered in the order of priority, and corrects the respective standard set values on the basis of the comparison. Such operation is effected by the set value change means 27 and the set value memory 24 included in the host computer 2. Figs. 8 (1), (2) are flowcharts showing exemplary operations of the looms in the optimal control. The operation in conformity with the flow of the flowchart is effected at a prescribed period. Now, it is assumed that a certain loom 3 for example, is often stopped because warp yarns are broken and so does not satisfy the rate of operation thereof being the highest priority reference value, namely, "NO" is decided in Step 1 while "YES" in Step 2. Thereupon, the operation is advanced such that a set value of the warp yarn total tension is reduced within a range wherein the set value is less than the lower limit of the warp yarn total tension which is then in the third order of priority (Steps 3 to 7). However, proivded that the rate of the loom operation does not still reach the reference value, the set value of the number of RPM is reduced within a range wherein the set value is not less than the lower limit of the number of RPM being the second order of priority (Steps 8 to 11). In addition, when the feed of the weft yarn is often stopped due to its breakage and so does not satisfy the rate of operation being the highest priority reference value, i.e., in case of "NO" in Step 1 while "NO" in Step 2, fluid (air) pressure is increased within a range wherein it is not more than the upper limit of the fluid pressure being the fourth order of priority (Steps 12 to 16). Then, the warp yarn total tension is reduced within a range it is not less than the lower limit of the warp yarn total tension being the third order of priority (Steps 17 to 20 and Step 16). However, provided that the rate of operation still does not reach the reference value, the number of RPM, the second order of priority, is lowered within a range it is not less than the lower limit thereof (Steps 21 to 24, and 16). In contrast with the above cases, when the rate of operation is very high, i.e., in case of "YES" in step 1, the number of RPM and the warp yarn tension are increased within a range wherein the rate of operation is not less than the lower limit of the reference value (Steps 25 to 33), and if there is nevertheless no problem, the set value of the fluid (air) pressure is reduced (Steps 35 to 37 and 29). Moreover, in Steps 30 to 33, whether the upper limit value is made to be the optimal one or the lower limit value to be the optimal one is previously entered in the host computer along with the reference values. Here, high tension is made optimum. Fig. 9 is a block diagram showing an example of a centralized control apparatus according to the present invention. The fabric specification input means 28 has the key board 17, the display 6, a fabric specification input circuit 29 for entering fabric specification data from the keyboard 7, a machine number input circuit 30 for entering a loom number, and a fabric specification memory 31 for storing a fabric specification data. The accumulation data memory 22 includes a similar item/interpolation data memory 32, a data read circuit 33 for reading data available from the above latter memory 32, a data write circuit 34 for writing a data, a data memory 35 for storing arithmetic operation basic data such for example as tension/denier, and a write circuit 36 for writing basic data in the memory 35. The set value evaluation means 23 has a coincidence circuit 37 for deciding whether any same specification standard set value exists in the accumulation data memory 22 based on the data from the fabric specification memory 31, a memory 38 for storing arithmetic operation items, a memory 39 for storing similar interpolation items, an evaluation method selection circuit 40 for selecting a proper evaluation method based on data from the above respective memories 38, 39 and data from the fabric specification memory 31, an arithmetic circuit 41 for operating prescribed arithmetic operation on the basis of a signal from the selection circuit 40, a similarity decision circuit 42, a similar data memory 43 for storing similar data derived from the similarity decision circuit a set value correction circuit 54 for correcting the respective standard set values stored in the set value memory 24 based on the decision result available from the above operation quality decision circuit 53. Moreover, the respective corrected standard set values are stored in the accumulation data memory 22 as fabric specification standard set values corresponding thereto on the basis of the decision result by the operation quality decision circuit 53. Although, in the above embodiments, the accumulation data memory 22 is supposed to be an external memory such as a floppy disk, it may be one profitably employing a semiconductor memory such as a battery-backed-up random access memory (RAM) contained in the host computer. A second embodiment will be described, wherein a method is given which enables data on a newly woven fabric to be automatically transferred to the control units of respective looms and thereby control data for the next woven fabric to be set although now in weaving. Namely, in the this embodiment, control data in response to kinds of fabrics are stored beforehand in the memory 9 of the centralized control apparatus 1, and a style number scheduled for the next weaving is made to wait as a queue for every looms. Thereby, control data for the next woven fabric are read in order based on warp-out signals from the respective looms 3, and transferred to the control units 11 of the respective looms 3, whereby the corresponding looms 3 are continuously operated. Control data for the succeeding woven fabrics are previously stored in the memory 9 as the queue, in such a manner. Accordingly, preparing works for the respective looms 3 can be effectively conducted without the need of data input each time of weavings. Fig. 10 shows the arrangement of the host computer 2 for putting the present embodiment into practice. A control parameter setting unit 55 is connected with the memory 9 via a gate 56 for determining values of weaving conditions. In addition, a style number setting unit 57 is connected with the memory 9 via a gate 58 and a upper decoder 59 for setting a style number representative of a group of weaving conditions in response to kinds of fabrics. Furthermore, a setting unit 60 for setting style numbers on and after the next weaving time is connected with an upper decoder 59 via a plurality of queue registers 8₁... 8 n corresponding to the respective loom numbers and a gate 62. In addition, a loom number setting unit 63 is connected with a common latch input terminal of the respective queue registers 8₁...8 n via a gate 64 and a loom number decoder 65, and futher via one of input terminals of a plurality of AND gates 66. Moreover, a set pulse generator 67 is connected with the other of input terminals of an AND gate 69 via a gate 68. Still more, a set pulse generator 70 is connected directly with the memory 9 via a gate 71 while it branches through the gate 71 and is connected with the memory 9 via one of input terminals of an OR gate 72 through an address updating counter 73 and a lower decoder 74. By contrast, a reference pulse generator 96 is connected with the other of the inpt terminals of the OR gate 72 via a gate 75 and a read pulse train generator 76, while it branches on this side of the gate 75 to a gate 77, a scanning counter 78, and a decoder and is connected with a multiplexer 80. The reference pulse generator 96 further branches and is connected with the loom number decoder 65 via a gate 82. Still more, the pulse train generator 76 is also connected in the other output terminal with clear input terminals of the queue registers 8₁...8 n and a reset input terminal of a flip-flop 84 via a plurality of AND gates 83. The multiplexer 80 is connected with a set input ternimal of the flip-flop 84. One input terminal of the flip-flop is connected with a gate 82, while the other output terminal connected with respective one-side input terminals of a gate 75 and an AND gate, and with the gate 77 through a NOT gate 86 and with the gates 56, 58, 61, 68, 64, 71 through a NOT gate 87. Then, Fig. 11 shows internal arrangement of the terminal device 13 which has plurality of latches 88 and a decoder 89. The plurality of the latches 88 store data such as a number of RPM of a loom prime motor and a number of times of yarn beatings, or warp yarn tension via a waveform shaper 90 and deliver them to a loom control circuit 91. Moreover, the decoder 89 receives a selection item code from the waveform shaper 92 and operates the latch 88 corresponding to the code. Here, a warp-out contact 93 of the loom control circuit 91 is connected with the multiplexer 80 via a NOT gate 94 and an amplifier 95. Then, examplery control data transfer will be described. Since the flip-flop 84 has not been set with all the looms 3 out of a warp-out state, the gate 82 remains opened due to the one output of the flip-flop 84 and the gates 56, 58, 61, 68, 64, 71, 77 remain opened because of the NOT gates 86, 87 due to the other output of the flip-flop 84. Meanwhile, a style number selects upper addresses in the memory 9 via the upper decoder 59 by the style number setting unit 57 in order to set weaving conditions of a certain fabric. With this situation, control parameters such as a number of RPM of the prime motor, a number of times of yarn beatings, and warp yarn tension are successively stored in the memory 9 based on memory timing pulses issued from set pluse generator 70 in order to set the control parameters, i.e., weaving conditions. A memory address in this case is determined without ambiguity by an upper address defined by the style number and a lower address defined by the counter 73 via the lower decoder 74. The lower address can be updated by the counter 73 and the lower decoder 74. In such a manner, the memory stores control parameters for every style numbers carried thereon. In addition, the succeeding style numbers are stored in the queue registers 8₁...8 n corresponding thereto via the setting unit 60 synchronized with the successive set pulses from the set pulse generator 67. The above operation for specifying the queue registers 8₁...8 n is performed by the loom number setting unit 63 and the loom number decoder 65. Thus, the next style number is previously stored in the queue registers 8₁...8 n . In such weaving operation, provided that weaving of a certain loom 3 is completed, the corresponding warp-out contact 93 is closed, so that a warp-out signal is provided to the multiplexer 80 via the terminal device 13. Hereby, the flip-flop 84 changes to a set state and scanning effected by the loom number decoder 65 is stopped. In the set state of the flip-flop, the gates 56, 58, 61, 68, 64, 71, 77 are set to a closed state, while the gate 75 is opened. Therefor, an output pulse from the reference pulse generator 96 is provided to the read pulse train generator 76. On the contrary, since the one input terminal of the AND gate 85 is on an "H" level, the corresponding gate 62 is opened by a signal from the loom number decoder 65. Then, the upper decoder 59 of the memory 9 receives the next style number concerning the loom 3 in the warp-out state from the queue registers 8₁...8 n corresponding to the warp-out loom 3, and a control parameter having the above style number is transferred to the corresponding loom 3 via the multiplexer 80. As described above, provided that the warp-out signal concerning a certain loom 3 is produced, the host computer 2 reads out the next style number from the corresponding queue registers 8₁...8 n and automatically transfers a control parameter corresponding to the above style number via the multiplexer 80. Accordingly, in the warp-out state, the next preparation for weaving can be automatically effected without requiring new designation of the style number. Although in the above embodiment, the queue registers 8₁...8 n are provided for storing the next style number, a further long queue may be formed with use of a microprocessor to store many style numbers. Hereby, style numbers on and after the next time can be stored to further improve system performance. Then, a third embodiment will be described below. The embodiment provides a method for realizing the optimal control for looms in which control data for weaving required for actual operation of respective looms can be simply transferred from a central control unit to control units of the respective looms while yarn information can be also delivered to the control units of the respective looms. According to the present embodiment, control data for weaving for every fabric styles are previously stored in the memory 9 of the host computer 2 in correspondence with 9 style number, and upon changing the fabric style of each loom the style number is designated, whereby all the control data required for the weaving can be read out of the memory 9 and immediately transmitted for every control units 11 of the corresponding looms 3. In addition, in order to profitably employ yarn information in the weaving, information of yarns needed for the weaving in silk reeling processes thereof is also stored simultaneously with that of beam numbers and lot numbers, and upon changing warp yarn beams and weft yarn cones information thereof is entered in the control device 11 of the loom 3. Thus, the present invention can realize the optimal operation state for every looms 3 in response to the yarn information. Then, operation of the present embodiment will be described. The host computer 2 incorporates therein control data required for the control units 11 of the respective looms 3 by a control program based on control, arithmetic operation, and memory functions of the CPU 5, and stores them in the memory 9. The host computer 2 further transfers required control data through the data bus 4 on the basis of a request from the control device 11 of each loom 3. Such control data are entered in the host computer 2 via the keyboard 7 and prepared while checking them with the display 6, and thereafter stored in the memory 9 together with a style number peculiar to a fabric style. In such a manner, weaving condition data such for example as a number of RPM of a loom per unit time is for example an air jet loom, a number of times of weft beatings per unit length, warp tension in weaving, on/off timing of a nozzle for weft insertion, pressure setting of air for weft insertion, and others are prepared beforehand for every style numbers, i.e., for every fabric styles, and thereafter stored in the memory 9. Thus, designation of any control data thereafter can be simply effected only by specifying a style number in interest. In addition, contents of the control data so set can be changed at need, and in order to realize the optimal conditions can be altered each time of actual weaving or trial weaving. Fig. 12 shows a procedure in changing internal control data for every style numbers. With selection of "style change" by an operator through the keyboard 7, a program needed to change a fabric style is automatically started. Designating here a style number to be changed, the CPU 5 reads out the designated style number from the memory 9 and displays it on the display 6. Hereupon, an operator selects an item to be changed from the above control data and changes its numerical value to a needed one. Thereafter, the CPU 5 newly stores in the memory 9 the changes control data as style number data. By contrast, yarn information is stored in the memory 9 together with a warp yarn beam number and a weft yarn cone lot number. Such a beam number and a lot number are previously written in a beam and a cone in a preparation stage of weaving. Warp yarn information is representative of the total length of a yarn, a beam outer diameter or bad yarn information such as fluffing, siges, unevenness, yarn break in a pre-process, e.g., in a sizing process. In addition, weft yarn information is representation of, besides bad yarn information such as yarn break in yarn manufacture, i.e., a yarn lot, yarn length, and yarn thickness. In such a manner, the host computer 2 stores style numbers each for specifying control data, beam numbers each for specifying warp yarn information, and lot numbers for specifying weft yarn information as a queue for every loom numbers as a series of starting data, in the external memory 9 of the CPU 5. Then, Fig. 13 shows the order of operation by a centralized control apparatus of the present embodiment. The centralized control is executed by a centralized control program contained in the CPU 5. First, the CPU 5, upon receiving a command of starting the centralized control, starts its control, designates a loom number, e.g., "1", and receives weaving information data from the terminal unit 13 of the loom 3 control device 11. The terminal unit 13 provides data needed to control the corresponding loom and delivered from the host computer 2 to the loom control device 11, while incorporates a signal representative of weaving information from the corresponding loom, temporarily stores the signal, and transfers it to the host computer 2 at the time of receiving a data transfer command from the host computer 2. The CPU 5 decides here the presence of a data request by the control device 11 of the loom 3 based on the above reception data. As the control device 11 requests any data, the CPU 5 designates the style number of the data, a warp yarn beam number, and a weft yarn let number, whereby reads out control data and yarn information corresponding to the above numbers, and transfers them to the corresponding terminal device 13 through the terminal control unit 10 and the data bus 4. The terminal device 13 here temporarily the transferred control data and yarn information data, and transmits them to the control unit 11 of the corresponding loom 3 which then holds the above data as required for loom operation to conduct necessary control based on the above data. Here, yarn information, particularly bad yarn data are profitably employed to temporarily set a speed of loom revolutions to lower value in the vicinity of a bad portion of the yarn. By contrast, the CPU 5 reads the next loom number, e.g., "2", and conducts the same processing as before therefor. In such a processing process, when there is no request for control data from the control unit 11, the CPU 5 branches from a data transfer routine, enters a registering routine, and decides the presence of style registering, beam registering, and lot number registering, in order. When the style number registering is requested and a registrable state is reached, an operator first enters the style number and their control data corresponding to the above style number, and commands data registering. With such operation, the host computer 2 stores the control data for each style number. In addition, when a beam registering or a lot registering is requested and a registrable state is reached, an operator enters first a loom number, then a style number, and finally a beam number corresponding to the style number, yarn information thereof, a cone number corresponding to the style number, and weft yarn information thereof. Futhermore, the operator stores the above information in the external memory 9, while registers the style number and beam number, and a lot number in the external memory 9 as starting data of the corresponding loom. In such a manner, the host computer 2 enters the loom number and style number corresponding thereto, the beam number, and lot number as starting data for all the looms 3, and registers them therein. Then, Fig. 14 shows other form of the centralized control described above. First, the CPU 5, after starting the centralized control, decides the presence of a control data transfer request from the control unit 11 of the loom 3. For example, when there is a transfer request from the control unit 11 of the loom 3, the CPU 5 starts a data transfer routine. In the first place, the CPU 5 decides whether the data for which transfer is requested in control data for a style or not, and if no, advances forward the next step to transfer needed yarn information. But, when control data are requested because of the need of style change, the CPU 5 searches a number of the next starting style, reads needed control data from the above number and transfers it, and thereafter transfers yarn information of a warp yarn beam number and a weft yarn lot number to the control unit 11 of the loom 3. Such operation is repeated also for the other control unit 11, whereby the host computer 2 controls the control unit 11 of all the looms. When there is no data transfer request at the above decision of the presence of the control data transfer request, the CPU 5 enters a registering routine and decides the presence of style registering yarn information registering, and transfer order registering from an operator. When a style registering command is provided to the CPU 5 to permit an operator to newly enter control data corresponding to a style number, a step of style registering is started. The operator, after registering or style number, enters in succession control data corresponding to the above style number. Thus, all the control data are registered. At the time of end of such style registering, the control program again returns to the first step. Moreover, when the operator requests yarn infomation registering, the CPU 5 starts this program. The operator, after registering a beam number and a lot number, enters in sucession yarn information of warp and weft yarns. The control program again returns to the first step after all the needed information is entered. When the operator requests registering of the transfer order, the centralized control apparatus 1 starts its steps. Then, the operator, after specifying the loom number, designates the transfer order based on the weaving order of the associated loom and simultaneously enters the style number. The operator further enters in succession a corresponding beam number and lot number. In such manner, when a style number to be weaved, a warp yarn beam number and a weft yarn cone lot number at that time, etc., are specified for a control unit 11 of a certain loom 3, the transfer order is provided and entered. Accordingly, in the present program, various data can be entered even if it is not specified to which loom 3, a warp yarn beam, and a weft yarn cone should be supplied. This is advantageous to prepare starting data when the above information is specified.

Claims: A centralized control method for a system which includes a host computer (2), a memory (22) connected with said host computer, and a plurality of looms (3) controlled by an operation signal from said host computer, said method comprising the steps of: (a) accumulating during system operation accumulation data which includes fabric specifications for respective fabrics and includes set values which will cause a loom to weave each such fabric, and storing said accumulation data in said memory (22) (b) causing said host computer to decide , when fabric specifications for a new fabric to be woven by a certain said loom are entered into the host computer, whether said accumulation data includes similar fabric specifications, (c) causing said host computer to read, if stored in said memory, said accumulation data for similar fabric specification and to use it in a predetermined mathematical operation to estimate, from said fabric specification for said new fabric, standard set values for said new fabric; and (d) causing said host computer to transmit said standard set values for said new fabric to said certain looms by means of said operation signal therefor. A centralized control method according to claim 1, wherein said standard set values estimated by said host computer include numbers of RPM for loom prime motors, and warp yarn total tension. A centralized control method according to claim 1, wherein said standard set values estimated by said host computer include on/off timing control and fluid pressure for nozzles for weft insertion. A centralized control method according to claim 1, including the steps of: (a) transmitting from each said loom to said host computer operation data representative of the present operational efficiency of each said loom, and causing said host computer to compare the operation data from the looms, which are starting to operate under said standard set values, with reference values previously entered in said host computer, and (b) causing said host computer to prepare and transmit to each of said looms corrected set values when said comparison results indicate that said operation data from a respective loom is below said reference values. A centralized control method according to claim 4, wherein said reference values include a rate of loom operation and warp yarn total tension. A centralized control method according to claim 4, wherein said reference values include a fluid pressure. A centralized control method according to claim 4, wherein said operation data from each loom indicates how many times the loom has stopped due to broken warp and broken weft yarns. A centralized control apparatus for a plurality of looms, comprising: (a) fabric specification input means (28) for entering fabric specifications, (b) means (22) for accumulating during loom operation accumulation data which includes fabric specifications for respective fabrics and includes set values which cause a loom to weave each such fabric, and accumulation data memory means for storing said accumulation data, (c) set value evaluation means (23) for using accumulation data from said accumulation data memory means in a predetermined mathematical operation to estimate, from said fabric specification entered from said fabric specification input means, standard set values to be used for loom control, (d) set values memory means (24) for storing said estimated standard set values from said set value evaluation means, (e) set value transmitting means (25) for transmitting said standard set values to a plurality of the looms, (f) operation data receiving means (26) for receiving from each said loom operation data representative of present operational efficiency of each said loom, and, (g) set value change means (27) for preparing and storing in said set value memory means corrected set values by comparison between previously stored reference values and operation data received by said operation data receiving means from one of said loom and indicating inefficient operation of said one loom, said set value transmitting means thereafter transmitting said corrected set values to said one loom in lieu of said standard set values.

Inventors: ASAI TAKESHI, MAENAKA KOYU, SAINEN TSUTOMU, SAKANO TOSHIYUKI, ASAI, TAKESHI, MAENAKA, KOYU, SAINEN, TSUTOMU, SAKANO, TOSHIYUKI
Applicants: TSUDAKOMA IND CO LTD, TSUDAKOMA CORP.
Application year: 1985
Main classification: G05B19
IPC codes: G05B19