ADHESIN ANTIGENS, ANTIBODIES AND DNA FRAGMENT ENCODING THE ANTIGEN, METHODS AND MEANS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND IMMUNIZATION ETC.

Abstract: An antigen which, as its major immunizing component, comprises a determinant of an adhesin polypeptide or an immunogenically active subsequence thereof or a precursor therefor which is convertible to an immunogenically active form, antibodies against which determinant react with the adhesin polypeptide produced by pathogenic adhesin-forming bacteria which adhere to mammalian tissue, antibodies against such antigen, and DNA expressing, as a principal gene product thereof, such antigen.

Description: "Adhesin antigens, antibodies and DNA fragment v encoding the antigen, methods and means for dia¬ gnosis and immunization etc". The present invention relates, inter alia, to an antigen useful , e. g . , for the immunization of a mammal , an antibody raised against it, and a vaccine produced from it. Antigens composed of several proteins which together form a distinct phenotype in a pathogenic bacterial strain or species , and which must therefore be assumed to contain a large number of immunogenic de¬ terminants, are well known . However, such antigens - and vaccines produced from them - have a number of disadvantages : in particular, they have a tendency to be too selective in that, on immunization , antibodies are formed against each of these immunogenic determinants which together identify the one particular bacterial strain from which the, antigen has been derived, but not other bacterial strains of the same species so that immunization is only effected against this particu- lar strain , but not other, closely related strains of the same species . The present invention is an attempt to overcome these disadvantages by providing an antigen which substantially only comprises the immu¬ nogenic determinant(s) which lead to the desired immunity and which is fu rthermore not limited to one particular strain f the pathogenic bacteria in question . It has become increasingly clear that the capacity of many pathogenic bacteria to adhere to the su rface of cells is of primary importance for the initiation of many infectious diseases (Beachey, J. infect. Dis. 143, 1981 , pp. 325-345) . This adhesion capacity is caused by the presence of receptors on mammalian tissue cells, such as epithelial cells, or on mammalian erythrocytes, which receptors, due to their configuration , form bonds with adhesin polypeptides . ( I n the present context, the term "adhesin polypeptide" is intended to indicate both a polypeptide specifically required for the adhesion phenotype and, more generally, a polypeptide in whose absence adhesion does not take place (for whatever reason) . ) Each receptor is assumed to bond with a different adhesin structu re. The receptor may be a peptide receptor, such as an amino acid present on a sugar, or - more usu- ally - a carbohydrate such as neuramic acid- (2^3) -galactose, manno- se-α- (l-*2) -mannose or digalactoside (the α-D-Galp- (l →, 4) -β-D-Galp moiety present in the globoseries of glycolipids which in the present context is occasionally termed the globoside) . In many pathogenic bacteria, the adhesin polypeptide proper is be¬ lieved to form only part of a larger sequence of polypeptides which are ail, in one way or another, related to the adhesion function (e. g . polypeptides which mediate the transport of the adhesin th rough the cell wall or anchor it to the outer surface of the cell wall and so on) , and in accordance with the aim of the present invention, a specific adhesin polypeptide is identified among the other polypeptides of the sequence and used as an antigen . This is thought to constitute a less selective identification marker so that antibodies will not only be raised against the strain from which the antigen is derived but also against the other pathogenic strains of the same bacterial species . Accordingly, the present invention relates to an antigen which , as its major immunizing component, comprises a determinant of an adhesin polypeptide or an immunogenically active subsequence thereof or a precu rsor therefor which is convertible to an immunologically active form, antibodies against which determinant react with the adhesirr polypeptide produced by pathogenic adhesin-forming bacteria which adhere to mammalian tissue. This antigen may comprise an amino acid sequence of at least 5 amino acids and up to the entire amino acid sequence of the adhesin polypeptide. The adhesin polypeptide may conveniently be derived from adhesin- forming bacteria . This group of bacteria comprises both grampositive and gramnegative bacteria, and the bacterial species of the greatest interest in the present context from which it would be advantageous to derive one or more specific adhesin polypeptides are uropathogenic or enteropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli or other enteric bac¬ teria or oral bacteria, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrhσfis, Yersinia spp. , Pseudomonas aeruginosa or other Pseudomonas spp. , Moraxeifa bovis or other Moraxeiia spp. , Bac- teroides nodosus, Staphylococcus spp. , Streptococcus spp. or Borde- tell a spp . such as Bordetella pertussis. Alternatively, the adhesin polypeptide may be prepared synthetically, as described below. For some pathogenic bacteria in this group, there is evidence that filamentous structures termed pili (fimbriae) projecting from the cell wall are in some way connected with adhesion , and therefore - and because the pili are easily pu rified - whole pili preparations have been used as antigens in vaccines, e. g . gonococcus pili antigen (tested in US Army field tests) . Previous investigators working with pili preparations went to great lengths in attempts to prepare "pu re" pili protein for protein charac¬ terization and immunization , and their efforts were apparently suc¬ cessful in that their preparations only showed one band in SDS gels, (US Patent No. 4, -443, 431 ( Buchanan T.M. et al) ; Saliet I . E. & E . C . , Gottlisch , J. Exp. Med . 146, 1977, p . 1169; Klemm P. , I . Orskov & F. Orskov, Infect, and Immunity 36, 1982, p . 462; Schoolnik G . K. et al , J. Exp. Med. 159, 1984, p . 1351 ; Svanborg E. C. , Prog . Allergy 33, 1983, p . 189) . The obtained pili protein preparations exhibited at least th ree functions . The first function was the ability to form polymers, presumably through hydrophobic binding processes; a pro- perty essential for the formation of a pilus filament from monomeric subunits . The second property was the ability to engender antibo¬ dies; a property which would be essential for any attempts to use the protein as a vaccine. The thi rd property was the ability to adhere to cell surface receptors . Since the investigators were not able to iden- tify more than one protein in their pili protein preparations as well as in the pili themselves, it was concluded that the pili were polymeric aggregates of identical monomeric protein subunits, each subunit having all th ree of the above-described functions, (US Patent No. 4,443,431 (Buchanan T. M. et al) ; Rothbard J . B . , PNAS 82, 1985, p . 915) . However, as mentioned previously, the intact whole pili from a single species has great antigenic diversity . In addition, it has been demonstrated that when used as a vaccine, intact whole pili of a single antigenic type produce antibody primarily to that single anti¬ genic type rather than shared pili antigens . Previous investigators have chemically cleaved the purified pilus subunit into fragments with the proposed functions: Polymerization function , common antigen func¬ tion, and binding function . Each individual function was identified with a separate fragment of the purified pilus subunit. Thus, it has been assumed that purified pili protein preparations contain a single protein - the pilin monomer. This pilin monomer has been chemically cleaved and assumed to contain the binding function and the principal antigenisity - the same as the polymerized pure pilus protein . Extensive studies carried out by the applicants demonstrate, however, that the supposed pure pili protein in fact consists of several protein fractions with separate functions . I n fact, the pilus filament is not responsible for the cell surface binding but a minor component con¬ sidered to be a contaminant which is most likely associated with the filament is what is responsible for the cell surface binding . This unique observation could only be ascribed to the fact that the struc- tural formation of pili and the property of adhesion to digalactoside receptors can be genetically dissociated . Other mutated organisms retaining recognizable pili structures but being unable to adhere further confirmed the observation. The implication of the observation was further that the pilus protein, previously supposed to be pure, must contain at least two fractions, one of which is a structural ele¬ ment involved in the actual formation of pili and the other one being a fraction responsible for the adhesion property. The fact that both fractions have antigenic properties opened up the possibility of en¬ gendering antibodies against only the adhesion-responsible fraction . I n the case of pilus-carrying bacteria, too, it is advantageous to produce an antigen showing less strain selectivity, if any, and such an antigen is provided by identifying and producing one or more components which form part of the structure of the entire pilus and which mediate the adhesion capacity specifically. In the present context, such a component is termed a pilus adhesin polypeptide. In accordance with what is stated above, the pilus adhesin polypeptide usually comprises a minor component of the entire pilus amino acid sequence of pili derived from pathogenic pilus-forming bacteria and is distinct from the pilin (the subunit of the purified pilus, forming the major part of the pilus fibre) . Examples of pilus-forming bacteria which are useful for this pu rpose are u ropathogenic or enteropatho¬ genic strains of Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrhaiis, Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp . and Bordetella pertussis. For the purposes of the present invention, the investigations dis¬ closed herein have primarily been concerned with a u ropathogenic strain of E. coli which gives rise to pyelonephritis . It should, how¬ ever, be understood that the different E. coli genetic systems coding for pilus adhesins are very similar, and that consequently, it is highly probable that such minor pilus components mediating adhesion exist for all types of pilus, i . e. also for pili from other bacteria than E. coli. The receptor responsible for the binding of the pathogenic pilus-forming bacteria due to the interlocking structures of the recep¬ tor - or part of the receptor - and adhesin molecules, respectively, has been identified for uropathogenic E. coli to be the digalactoside, the α-D-Galp- t J -β-D-Galp moiety present in the globoseries of glycolipids, to which the bacteria may attach in the uroepithelium and which is also present on human erythrocytes as a part of the P bloodgroup antigens . I n the cou rse of the research leading to the present invention , the inventors have identified the region on the chromosome of a uropatho¬ genic E. coli strain which encodes Pap pili (pili associated with pyelo¬ nephritis) which is a 8.5 kb long region which has been found to code for at least eight different polypeptides . The present inventors have also established the polypeptides the absence of which gives rise to non-adhesion of the E. coli cells . These polypeptides are therefore assumed to be responsible for the adhesion phenotype of u ropathoge¬ nic E. coli. Consequently, the present invention also concerns an antigen of the amino acid sequence: Met-Lys-Lys- l le-Arg-Gly- eu-Cys-Leu-Pro-Val-Met- Leu-Gly-AIa-Val- eu-Met-Ser-Gln-His-Val-His-Ala-Val-Asp-Asn- Leu-Th r-Phe-Arg-Gly- Lys- eu-l le- l le-Pro-Ala-Cys-Thr-Val-Ser-Asn-Thr-Thr-Val-Asp-Trp- Gln-Asp-Val-Glu- l le-Gln-Thr-Leu-Ser-Gln-Asn-Gly-Asn-His-Glu-Lys- Glu-Phe-Thr-Val-Asn-Met-Arg-Cys-Pro-Tyr-Asn-Leu-Gly-Thr-Met- Lys-Val-Thr- lle-Thr-Ala-Thr-Asn-Thr-Tyr-Asn-Asn-Ala-Ile-Leu-Val- Gln-Asn-Thr-Ser-Asn-Thr-Ser-Ser-Asp-Gly-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr- eu- Tγr-Asn-Ser-Asn-Ala-Gly-Asn-lle-GIy-Thr-Ala- lle-Thr-Leu-Gly-Thr- Pro-Phe-Thr-Pro-Gly-Lys-lle-Thr-Gly-Asn-Asn-Ala-Asp-L-ys-Thr-IIe- Ser-Leu-His-Ala-Lys-Leu-Gly-Tyr-Lys-Gly-Asn-Met-Gln-Asn-Leu-lle- Ala-Gly-Pro-Phe-Ser-Ala-Thr-Ala-Thr- eu-Val-Ala-Ser-Tyr-Ser or any immunogenically active subsequence thereof, or Met-l le-Arg-Leu-Ser-Leu-Phe-l le-Ser-Leu-Leu-Leu-Thr-Ser-Val-Ala- Val-Leu-Ala-Asp-Val-Gln-l le-Asn-lle-Arg-Gly-Asn-Val-Tyr-IIe-Pro- Pro-Cys-Thr-l le-Asn-Asn-Gly-Gln-Asn- lle-Val-Val-Asp-Phe-Gly-Asn- Ile-Asn-Pro-Glu-His-Val-Asp-Asn-Ser-Arg-Gly-Glu-Val-Thr-Lys-Thr- l le-Ser-IIe-Ser-Cys-Pro-Tyr-Lys-Ser-GIy-Ser-Leu-Trp-lle-Lys-Val- Thr-Gly-Asn-Thr-Met-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gln-Asn-Asn-Val-Leu-AIa-Thr- Asn-lle-Thr-His-Phe-Gly- l ie-Ala- Leu-Tyr-Gln-Gly- ys-Gly-Met-Ser- Thr-Pro-Leu-lle-Leu-GIy-Asn-Gly-Ser-Gly-Asn-Gly-Tyr-Gly-Val-Thr- Ala-Gly-Leu-Asp-Thr-Ala-Arg-Ser-Thr-Phe-Thr-Phe-Thr-Ser-Val- Pro-Phe-Arg-Asn-Gly-Ser-Gly-lle-Leu-Asn-Gly-Gly-Asp-Phe-Gln- Thr-Thr-AIa-Ser-Met-Ser-Met-lle-Tyr-Asn or any immunogenically ac¬ tive subsequence thereof, or Met-Lys-Lys-Trp-Phe-Pro-Ala-Phe-Leu-Phe-Leu-Ser-Leu-Ser-Gly- Gly-Asn- Asp-Ala- Leu-Ala-Gly-Trp-His- Asn-Val-Met- Phe-Ty r-Ala- Phe-Asn-Asp-Tyr-Leu-Thr-Thr-Asn-Ala-Gly-Asn-Val-Lys-Val-lle- Asp-G In- Pro-Gin- Leu-Tyr- lie- Pro-Trp-Asn-Th r-Gly-Ser-Ala-Th r-Ala- Thr-Tyr-Tyr-Ser-Cys-Ser-Gly-Pro-Glu-Phe-Ala-Ser-Gly-Val-Tyr- Phe-Gln-Glu-Tyr-Leu-Ala-Trp-Met-Vai-Val-Pro-Lys-His-Val-Tyr-Thr- Asn-Glu-Gly-Phe-Asn-lle-Phe-Leu-Asp-Val-Gln-Ser-Lys-Tyr-Gly- Trp-Ser-Met-GIu-Asn-Glu-Asπ-Asp-Lys-Asp-Phe-Tyr-Phe-Phe-Val- Asn-Gly-Tyr-Glu-Trp-Asp-Thr-Trp-Thr-Asn-Asn-Gly-AIa-Arg-lle- Cys-Phe-Tyr-Pro-Gly-Asn- et-Lys-GIn-Leu-Asn-Asn-Lys-Phe-Asn- Asp-Leu-Val-Phe-Arg-Val-Leu-Leu-Pro-Val-Asp-Leu-Pro-Lys-GIy- His-Tyr-Asn-Phe-Pro-Val-Arg-Tyr-lle-Arg-Gly-lle-Gln-His-His-Tyr- Tyr-Asp-Leu-Trp-Gln-Asp-His-Tyr-Lys-Met-Pro-Tyr-Asp-Gln-lle- Lys-GI n- Leu -Pro- Ala-Thr-Asn-Thr- Leu-Met- Leu-Ser-Phe- Asp- Asn- Val-Gly-Gly-Cys-Gln-Pro-Ser-Thr-Gln-Val-Leu-Asn-Ile-Asp-His-GIy- Ser-Ile-Val-l le-Asp-Arg-Ala-Asn-Gly-Asn-lle-Ala-Ser-Gln-Thr-Leu- Ser-l le-Tyr-Cys-Asp-Val-Pro-Val-Ser-Val- Lys- l le-Ser-Leu-Leu-Arg- Asn-Thr- Pro- Pro- l le-Tyr-Asn -Asn-Asn- Lys- Phe-Ser-Val-Gly-Leu- Gly-Asn-Gly-Trp-Asp-Ser- l le- l le-Ser-Leu-Asp-Gly-Val-Glu-Gln-Ser- Glu-Glu- l le-Leu-Arg-Trp-Tyr-Thr-Ala-Gly-Ser-Lys-Thr-Val-Lys- l le- Glu-Ser-Arg-Leu-Tyr-Gly-Glu-Glu-Gly-Lys-Arg-Lys-Pro-Gly-Glu- Leu-Ser-Gly-Ser-Met-Th r-Met-Val-Leu-Ser- Phe- Pro or any immunoge¬ nically active subsequence thereof . These amino acid sequences have been established by well- known methods as described in Example 5. The absence of the latter two antigens have been positively demon¬ strated to cause lack of binding to the globoside receptor in all cases (cf. Example 3 below) and both of these are therefore assumed to be an adhesin polypeptide proper, while the former antigen has been shown to cause lack of binding in certain circumstances only (cf . Example 3 below) and is therefore assumed to be required for anchor¬ ing the adhesin polypeptide formed to the outer surface of the cell wall . It should be noted that the amino acid sequences shown above are the precu rsor forms of the pilus adhesin polypeptides containing N-termi- nal signal peptide-like sequences which are cleaved off when the polypeptide is exported through the bacterial inner membrane. I n accordance with the principles of the invention , it is preferred that the antigen of the invention be substantially free from other components related to the adhesion function such as other components of the pilus in order to avoid the formation of a wide variety of antibodies when the antigen is used for immunization with the con¬ sequent disadvantages outlined above. Most preferably, the antigen is in substantially pure form, i . e. also free from other determinants which are not in any way connected with adhesin formation but which might give rise to undesirable immunological reactions . I n another aspect, the invention relates to an antibody raised a- gainst, or directed substantially only against, an antigen as specified above which, as its major immunizing component, comprises a deter¬ minant of an adhesin polypeptide or an immunogenically active subse¬ quence thereof or a precursor therefor which is convertible to an immunologically active form . Such an antibody may be one which is obtained by immunizing an immunizable animal with an antigen as defined above and obtaining antiserum such as immunoglobulins from the animal in a manner known per se. The immunization is preferably performed by means of a stabilized aqueous solution of the antigen; the stabilization agent may be a buffer such as phosphate buffered saline or an adjuvant (also to further increase the antigenicity) , and a suitable adjuvant is Freund's adjuvant or aluminium hydroxide. For immunization purposes, mice, rabbits, goats and sheep are the pre¬ ferred animals, although pig immunoglobulins may also be employed as antibodies. The bleeding of the animal and the isolation of the antise- rum is performed according to well-known methods . The antibody according to the invention is preferably also in sub¬ stantially pure form which makes it useful for diagnostic pu rposes as described below. Alternatively, the antibody may also be produced by a hybridoma technique which is a well-known method for producing antibodies . I n the hybridoma technique using for instance mice as the animals immu¬ nized, mice are immunized with the antigen in question and spleen cells from the immunized mice are fused with myeloma cells whereupon the fused hybridoma cells are cloned, antibody-producing cells are grown in a suitable growth medium and the antibodies are recovered from the cultu re. The antibodies obtained by the hybridoma technique have the advantage of greater specificity and hence, greater accuracy of e. g. diagnosis . I n a possible further step, using recombinant DNA techniques, the gene or genes encoding the antibody are transferred from the hybridoma cell clone to a suitable vector, the hybrid vector is transformed to a suitable bacterial host, the host is grown in an appropriate medium and the resulting antibody is recovered from the culture. I n this way, an improved yield of antibody may be obtained. The host may be . one usually employed in the field of recombinant DNA technology such as Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis. A very important aspect of the present invention concerns a vaccine for immunizing a mammalian subject against diseases caused by patho¬ genic bacteria which adhere to mammalian tissue, which contains an immunogenically effective amount of an antigen as described above, optionally bound to a suitable carrier, together with an immunologi- cally acceptable vehicle. This vehicle may be any vehicle usually employed in the preparation of vaccines, such as a diluent, suspend¬ ing agent, adjuvant, etc. I n some cases, it will not be necessary to use a carrier as the anti- gen tends to polymerize with itself, but in instances where this is not the case, it may be advantageous to bind the antigen covalently to a carrier. This carrier will usually be a polymeric carrier and - especi¬ ally when the vaccine is to be used to immunize human beings - it is important that it be physiologically acceptable. Synthetic non-toxic and/or non-allergenic carriers for the immobilization of antigens are known, e. g . from Arnon , J. Immunological Methods 61, 1983, pp . 261 -273. Carriers of this type which are at present contemplated to be useful for this purpose are for instance poly-L-lysine and poly- D, L-alanine. A natu ral carrier may also be employed provided that it is non-toxic and non-allergenic. The invention further relates to a method of preparing such a vaccine in which an immunogenically effective amount of an antigen as defined above, optionally bound to a suitable carrier, is combined, e. g . mixed, with an immunologically acceptable vehicle in an amount giving the desired concentration of the antigen in the vaccine preparation . In a particular embodiment of the method of the invention , an immu¬ nogenically active amino acid sequence comprising at least 5 amino acids is covalently bound to the physiologically acceptable carrier, such as one of those mentioned above. The techniques for preparing fused polypeptides are known , e. g . from Casadaban et al . , Methods in Enzymology 100, 1983, pp . 293-308. I n another embodiment of the method of the invention , the nucleotide sequence encoding an antigen as defined above is fused to the nucleo- tide sequence encoding a physiologically acceptable carrier polypepti¬ de, the fused DNA sequence is inserted into a suitable vector, the hybrid vector is transformed to a suitable bacterial host, the host is grown in an appropriate medium, and the fused polypeptide is reco- vered from the cultu re and optionally purified. I n a fu rther aspect, the invention relates to a DNA fragment which comprises at least the nucleotide sequence encoding an antigen as defined above. It is preferred that the DNA fragment is one which encodes substantially no other antigen . This nucleotide sequence may be one which encodes the entire adhesin polypeptide or which encodes a precursor of an adhesin polypeptide which is convertible to an immunogenically active form or which encodes an immunogenically active subsequence of an adhesin polypeptide. I n order to code for an amino acid sequence with immunogenic activity, the DNA fragment should have a length of at least 5 codons (triplets) . This DNA may be part of the genetic information residing on the ch romosome of or on a plasmid from pathogenic adhesin-forming bacteria, representative examples of which are uropathogenic or enteropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli or other enteric bacteria or oral bacteria, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrhalis, Yersinia spp. , Pseudomonas aerugiπosa or other Pseudomonas spp. , Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp. , Bσcteroides nodosus, Staphylococcus spp . , Streptococcus spp . or Bordetella spp . such as Bordetella per¬ tussis . Thus, the DNA fragment may be the DNA or part of the DNA se¬ quence coding for a pilus adhesin polypeptide which may be derived from a pathogenic pilus-forming bacterium, such as a uropathogenic or enteropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrhalis, Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp. , or Bordetella pertussis . For the purpose of exemplification, the DNA fragment may be one which completely or partially comprises the DNA sequence coding for one or more of the adhesin polypeptides from a uropathogenic strain of E . coli. Consequently, the present invention relates to a DNA fragment which - as its major element - is composed of the following DNA sequence: ATGAAAAAGATAAGAGGTTTGTGTCTTCCGGTAATGCTGGGGGCAGTGT- TAATGTCTCAGCATGTACATGCAGTTGATAATCTGACCTTCAGAGGAAA- ACTGATTATTCCTGCCTGTACTGTAAGCAACACAACTGTTGACTGGCAG- GATGTAGAGATTCAGACCCTGAGTCAAAATGGAAATCACGAAAAAGAGT- TTACTGTGAATATGCGGTGTCCCTATAATCTGGGAACAATGAAGGTTAC- GATAACGGCAACAAACACTTATAACAATGCTATTTTAGTTCAGAATACA- TCAAACACATCTTCTGATGGGTTACTCGTTTATCTTTATAACAGTAATG- CAGGAAATATTGGGACTGCGATAACTTTAGGGACTCCATTTACGCCCGG- AAAAATCACAGGTAATAATGCAGATAAAACTATATCACTTCATGCCAAA- CTTGGATATQAAGGGAATATGCAGAATTTGATAGCCGGTCCTTTCTCT- GCAACAGCAACGCTGGTTGCATCATATTCGTAA, or ATGATTCGTTTATCATTATTTATATCGTTGCTTCTGACATCGGTCGCT- GTACTGGCTGATGTGCAGATTAACATCAGGGGGAATGTTTATATCCCC- CCATGCACCATTAATAACGGGCAGAATATTGTTGTTGATTTTGGGAAT- ATTAATCCTGAGCACGTGGACAACTCACGTGGTGAAGTCACAAAAACC- ATAAGCATATCCTGTCCGTATAAGAGTGGCTCTCTCTGGATAAAAGTT- ACGGGAAATACTATGGGAGGAGGTCAGAATAATGTACTGGCAACAAAT- ATAACTCATTTTGGTATAGCGCTGTATCAGGGAAAAGGAATGTCAACAC- CTTATATTAGGTAATGGTTCAGGAAATGGTTACGGAGTGACAGCAGGT- CTGGACACAGCACGTTCAACGTTCACCTTTACTTCAGTGCCCTTTCGT- AATGGCAGCGGGATACTGAATGGCGGGGATTTCCAGACCACGGCCAGTA- TGAGCATGATTTATAACTGA, or ATGAAAAAATGGTTCCCTGCTTTTTTATTTTTATCCCTGTCAGGCGGT- AATGATGCTTTAGCTGGATGGCACAATGTCATGTTTTATGCTTTTAAC- GACTATTTAACTACAAATGCTGGTAATGTTAAGGTTATTGACCAACCT- CAGCTATATATACCCTGGAATACAGGCTCTGCTACAGCAACTTATTAT- TCGTGCTCAGGTCCGGAATTTGCGAGTGGAGTGTATTTTCAGGAGTAT- CTGGCCTGGATGGTTGTTCCTAAACATGTCTATACTAATGAGGGGTTT- AATATATTTCTTGATGTTCAGAGCAAATATGGTTGGTCTATGGAGAAT- GAAAATGACAAAGATTTTTACTTCTTTGTTAATGGTTATGAATGGGAT- ACATGGACAAATAATGGTGCCCGTATATGTTTCTATCCTGGAAATATG- AAGCAGTTGAACAATAAATTTAATGATTTAGTATTCAGGGTTCTTTTG- CCAGTAGATCTCCCCAAGGGACATTATAATTTTCCTGTGAGATATATA- CGTGGAATACAGCACCATTACTATGATCTCTGGCAGGATCATTATAAA- ATGCCTTACGATCAGATTAAGCAGCTACCTGCCACTAATACATTGATG- TTATCATTCGATAATGTTGGGGGATGCCAGCCGTCAACACAAGTACTT- AATATAGACCATGGGAGTATTGTGATTGATCGTGCTAACGGAAATATT- GCAAGTCAGACGCTTTCAATTTATTGCGATGTACCAGTTAGTGTAAA- ATATCTCTGCTCAGAAATACACCACCAATATACAATAATAATAAATTT- TCGGTTGGGTTAGGTAATGGCTGGGATTCGATAATATCTCTTGATGGG- GTTGAACAGAGTGAGGAAATATTACGCTGGTACACAGCCGGCTCAAAA- ACAGTAAAGATTGAGAGCAGGTTGTATGGTGAAGAGGGAAAGAGAAAA- CCCGGGGAGCTATCTTGGTTCTATGACTAGTGTTCTGAGTTTCCCCTGA or any subsequence thereof which, when expressed, constitutes an immunogenically active subsequence of the adhesin polypeptide en¬ coded by any one of the entire DNA sequences shown above. The sequence of the respective DNA fragments has been established by well-known methods as described in Example 4. I n a further, important aspect, the invention relates to a method of preparing an antigen comprising, as its major immunizing component, a determinant of an adhesin polypeptide, in which a bacterial host harbouring a hybrid vector containing an inserted DNA fragment which comprises at least the nucleotide type sequence encoding an antigen as defined above, the DNA fragment encoding substantially no other antigen, is cultivated, and the product expressed from the DNA fragment is recovered, optionally followed by purification . The DNA fragment which encodes an adhesin polypeptide or an immu¬ nogenically active subsequence thereof or a precursor therefor which is convertible to an immunoiogically active form may be obtained, e. g . , by excising the same from the bacterial DNA in which it occurs in nature by recombinant DNA technology, e. g. as follows: Chromosomal DNA from an adhesiπ-polypeptide generating bacterium is cut up using restriction endonuclease, and the individual DNA frag¬ ments are religated with suitable vectors which are then transformed to suitable bacterial hosts . Clones of bacteria that have received the vector are then examined with respect to thei r adhesin function as assessed by thei r ability to bind to any solid surface containing the specific receptor, for example by agglutination test with eryth rocytes by standard methods. The DNA fragments from the clones which have retained the adhesin function are then subcloned in a suitable vector and then subjected to transposon mutagenesis and/or partial digestion and religation , thereby establishing subclones which contain the smallest DNA fragments which retain the capability of encoding the adhesin function in the bacterial host. Hereby one obtains the small¬ est necessary piece of DNA operon to express the cell surface adhesin function . Fu rther, manipulations by either transposon mutagenesis or deletion utilizing recombinant DNA technology is used to identify individual genes within the operon which retain or do not retain the capability of expressing the adhesin polypeptide. Gene or genes expressing adhesin polypeptide are then inserted in a suitable vector, optionally with insertion of suitable promotors to enhance the expres¬ sion of the adhesin polypeptide or polypeptides . Then , , the vector is transformed into a suitable host organism, such as a bacterium, e. g . a gram-negative bacterium such as E. coli or B . subtilis. Another strategy in the last stage is to selectively block or eliminate genes not essential to the adhesin polypeptide production , in the case of E. coli, the papA and papC genes in the above-mentioned smallest ne¬ cessary piece of DNA operon . As purification by classical chemical methods of the minor pilus adhe¬ sin polypeptide from a preparation in which it is present in admixtu re with the major pilus structural component (which is normally produced from the same operon) is extremely difficult, if not impossible, due to the fact that the structural component, which is immunogenic per se, is present in much larger amount, this recombinant DNA technique for producing the minor pilus adhesin polypeptide is of decisive impor¬ tance to obtain an immunogenically effective and sufficiently pure antigen for the purposes of the present invention , as the recombinant DNA technique permits the selective removal of genes encoding unde- sired antigens, or expressed in another manner, permits selection of the gene or genes encoding the desired minor adhesin polypeptides . By inserting this gene or these genes in suitable vectors, optionally fused with other genes as described herein , it is possible to obtain large amounts of the minor pilus adhesin polypeptides which are otherwise present only in immunogenically substantially ineffective, hitherto neglected small proportions in the known pilus preparations . I n accordance with a special embodiment, several genes encoding one or several of the desi red adhesin polypeptides may be inserted in the same vector, so that the resulting product produced by the microor¬ ganism will be a product with recurring determinants of the antigen in question , thus enhancing the immunogenity or receptor-binding efficiency. All of these operations are carried out in accordance with methods well known in the field of recombinant DNA technology and explained in more detail in Examples 1 -3 below. The vector used in this method may be any vector usually employed for the purpose such as pBR322 derivatives, lacUVS promoter vectors, broad host range vectors such as 7 " σc promoter vectors, shuttle vectors, runaway plasmid derivati¬ ves, etc. The growth medium in which the bacterial host is grown may be any growth medium conventionally employed for fermentation processes such as e. g . L-broth or M9 glycerol medium. The bacterial host is conveniently selected among hosts whose behaviour under fermentation conditions is known, such as Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis . Purification which , as mentioned above, will be advantageous in many cases as the formation of irrelevant antibodies, i . e. antibodies which take no part in the immunization against the antigen in question , and which may even give rise to undesirable reactions on the part of the animal in which it is formed, is avoided as is the administration con¬ currently with the antigen of possible toxic substances formed by the host bacterium, e.g. a Iipopolysaccharide, has, however, been found to be problematic. I n order to facilitate purification, a method has been devised involving the use of fused polypeptides. I n this method, a DNA fragment encoding a first polypeptide comprising the adhesin polypeptide or an immunogenically active subsequence thereof or a precursor therefor which is convertible to an immunologically active form is fused to a DNA sequence encoding a second polypeptide, the fused DNA sequence is inserted into a suitable bacterial host, the host is grown in an appropriate medium, the fused polypeptide is recovered from the cultu re and pu rified using an assay involving antibodies raised against the second polypeptide, and the second polypeptide is optionally cleaved off by means of a suitable protease followed by separation of the two polypeptides . An example of a DNA sequence which may advantageously be employed for this purpose is the lacZ gene encoding $-galactosidase, as the expression of this gene product and consequently of the adhesin polypeptide or subsequence thereof or precu rsor therefor is easy to detect, e. g . by growing the bacterial host on lactose indicator plates + and selecting for the positive ( Lac ) colonies . After pu rification , the second polypeptide may be cleaved off by means of a protease such as trypsin or chymotrypsin . Desi red peptide fragments which only derive from the DNA fragment encoding the first polypeptide to which the gene coding for the second polypeptide has been fused are selected on the basis of their immunogenic activi¬ ty, e. g . as tested in vitro. Separation of the two polypeptides may be performed by standard methods such as by ion exchange chro- matography, H PLC reverse phase ch romatography or affinity chroma- tography such as immunoaffinity ch romatography or receptor affinity chromatography. I n the case of immunoaffinity chromatography, either the antibodies raised against the antigens of the invention (comprising the first polypeptide) or the antibodies raised against the second polypeptide may be employed as the antibodies immobilized in the column . In receptor affinity chromatography, the receptor for the adhesin produced may be similarly employed . The DNA fragment used for the fusion with the DNA sequence encoding the second polypep- tide may be any of the DNA fragments indicated above. I n an alternative method of preparing the antigen of the invention , the adhesin polypeptide such as the pilus adhesin polypeptide or immunogenically active subsequence thereof may be prepared by peptide synthesis according to well- known methods such as by liquid phase peptide synthesis or by solid phase peptide synthesis (cf. for instance Stewart and Young, Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis, Freeman £• Co. , San Francisco, USA, 1969) . Solid phase peptide synthesis is the preferred method . I n solid phase peptide synthesis, the amino acid sequence is built by coupling an initial amino acid to a carrier and then sequentially adding the other amino acids in the sequence by peptide bonding, in this case to a length of at least 5 amino acrds. When preparing the adhesin polypeptide or subsequence thereof by solid phase peptide synthesis, it may therefore be advantageous to use the physiologically acceptable polymer useful as carrier for the antigen in the vaccine as the carrier to which the initial amino acid in the sequence is coupled . The preparation of synthetic peptides for use as vaccines may otherwise be performed essentially as described in Shinnick, "Synthetic peptides, immunogens and vaccines" , Ann . Rev . Microbiol. 37, 1983, pp . 425-446. According to the invention, the antibody raised against, or directed substantially against, an antigen which comprises a determinant of an adhesin polypeptide or an immunogenically active subsequence thereof or a precursor therefor which is convertible to an immunologically active form may be used in a composition for the passive immunization of a mammalian subject against diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria which adhere to mammalian tissue, which comprises an immunologically effective amount of an antibody as defined above, optionally bound to a suitable carrier, together with an immunologically acceptable vehi- cle. This composition may be prepared by a method comprising com¬ bining an immunogenically effective amount of the antibody with the immunologically acceptable vehicle, e. g . by mixing the components. The carrier to which the antibody is optionally covalently bound may be any of the carriers mentioned above in connection with the de- scription of the vaccine. The vehicle with which the antibody is mixed may be any vehicle usually employed for this purpose, such as a diluent, suspending agent, adjuvant, etc. , added in an amount to give the desired concentration of antibody in the composition . Though less efficient for immunization than the antigen described above, the antibody may thus be used for immunization purposes, but its principal use is as a diagnostic agent for the diagnosis of infec¬ tious diseases caused by pathogenic adhesin-forming bacteria which adhere to mammalian, e. g . human , tissue, examples of which are uropathogenic or enteropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli or other enteric bacteria or oral bacteria, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrhalis, Yersinia spp . , Pseudomonas σeru- ginosa or other Pseudomonas spp . , Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp . , Bacteroides nodosus, Staphylococcus spp . , Streptococcus spp. , or Bordetella spp . such as Bordetella pertussis . The invention there¬ fore also relates to a diagnostic agent which comprises an antibody as described above, such as an antibody raised against an immunogenic determinant of a pilus adhesin polypeptide, or an antibody raised against an immunogenic determinant of an antigen which is not an adhesin polypeptide or a subsequence thereof or precu rsor therefor. This antigen may for instance be another polypeptide encoded by an adhesin gene cluster (a sequence of genes which are somehow in¬ volved in mediating the adhesion capacity of the bacteria carrying them) , for instance one of the other polypeptides involved in the formation of pili, in the case of the pilus polypeptides from u ropatho¬ genic E. coli, e. g . the gene products of the genes pαpB, pαpC or pαpD (as shown in Fig . 1 and/or Fig . 2) encoding polypeptides of 13 kd, 81 kd and 28.5 kd, respectively . The pαpC and pαpD gene products are at present believed to mediate the assembly and/or anchorage of pilin subunits (encoded by the gene pαpA) du ring the pilin secretion and polymerization process (for the formation of pili) . When used as diagnostic agents, the antibodies may be labelled with , for instance, a colou ring agent so that bacteria containing the antigen to be detected appear as coloured agglomerates in the diagnostic test. Other standard methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; cf. Materials and Methods) or radioimmunoassay ( RIA) using radiolabelled antibodies may also be employed . Alternatively, the diagnostic agent may comprise a stable, labelled DNA sequence which is at least about 60% homologous with a DNA sequence in the bacterium whose presence or absence is to be estab¬ lished by the diagnostic test. In the present context, the term "stable" is intended to indicate that the nucleotide sequence is relati¬ vely constant, i . e. that base pair substitutions in which one base pair is replaced by another are reasonably infrequent. I n many ge¬ nes, such base pair substitutions are relatively common without ne¬ cessarily affecting the amino acid composition of the gene products which are expressed from them, but the base pair substitutions affect the diagnostic process which relies on a fairly high degree of homolo- gy between the DNA from the probe and the bacterial DNA used as the specimen to be tested, as the DNA (sub) sequence of the probe recognizes the same sequence or one which resembles it rather closely in the bacterial DNA . I n the diagnostic process, probe DNA is label¬ led, and the DNA is denatured to separate the strands in both the probe and the bacterial DNA; after mixing the DNAs, the strands are left to reform the double helical structure, but in case of homology (DNA sequence recognition) , some of the probe DNA will have been introduced in the bacterial DNA. This technique is known as hybridi¬ zation and is described in e. g. Southern, Methods in Enzymology 68, 1980, pp. 151 -176. I n order to have sufficient specificity as a diag¬ nostic agent, the DNA used as the probe should comprise a unique nucleotide sequence and should therefore have a length of at least 12 nucleotides . The probe DNA may advantageously be labelled with a radioactive isotope such as 3 H or 14 C in a manner known per se. The DNA sequence used as probe DNA may be one which comprises a gene which is part of an adhesin gene cluster, but which does not encode the adhesin polypeptide itself, or a diagnostically effective subsequence therof . This gene may, for instance, be one which codes for a pilus polypeptide produced by a pathogenic pilus-forming bacte- rium which is not a pilus adhesin polypeptide, or a diagnostically effective subsequence thereof. I n the system exemplified herein , the DNA sequence encoding the pilus polypeptide or a subsequence there¬ of is derived from a uropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli. Particu¬ larly advantageous diagnostic agents in this system have been found to be the genes papB, papC and papD - due to their genetic stability as defined above - or a diagnostically effective subsequence of any of those genes. As described above, the antigen according to the invention may be used as a component of a vaccine. Accordi ngly, this invention also comprises a method of immunizing a mammal such as a human being against diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria which adhere , to mam- malian , e. g . human , tissue, which comprises administering a vaccine containing an immunogenically effective amount of an antigen as de¬ scribed above, optionally bound to a suitable carrier, or a composition for passive immunization containing an antibody as described above, also optionally bound to a suitable carrier, and an immunologically acceptable vehicle. The administration may be performed in a manner known per se, such as by injecting the antigen or antibody in ad¬ mixtu re with a suitable injection vehicle such as isotonic saline. These pathogenic bacteria may be any bacteria which form adhesins or adhesin-like polypeptides, examples of which are uropathogenic or enteropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli or other enteric bacteria or oral bacteria, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neis¬ seria catarrhalis, Yersinia spp . , Pseudomonas aeruginosa or other Pseudomonas spp . , Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp . , Bacteroi- des nodosus, Staphylococcus spp . , Streptococcus spp. , or Bordetella spp. such as Bordetella pertussis . An interesting class of such bacte¬ ria is constituted by pilus-forming bacteria, important examples of which are uropathogenic or enteropathogenic strains of of Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrha¬ lis, Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp . , or Bordetella pertussis . Finally, it is contemplated that the antigen according to the present invention may be employed to determine the presence of the receptor for the particular adhesin polypeptide or active part thereof on mam¬ malian tissue cells such as epithelial cells . This is of potential impor¬ tance for identifying persons belonging to high-ris k groups, i . e. persons who appear to be predisposed for certain kinds of infection as such persons are those who produce large amounts of the receptor to which the pathogenic bacteria causing the infection in question bind by means of the adhesins they produce. When such persons have been identified, prophylactic treatment, i . e. principally immuniza- tion/vaccination, may be carried out. The method of determining the presence of the adhesin receptor and the amounts of adhesin receptor present may comprise incubating a specimen comprising tissue samples or cell scrapings with the adhesin followed by washing . An antibody raised against the adhesin and labelled with , e. g. , fluorescence or a radioactive isotope such as 1 -125, may be incubated with the speci¬ men, or alternatively the thus labelled adhesin may be used directly in the test. The amount of adhesin receptor in the specimen may then be determined by measuring the amount of radioactivity or fluorescen¬ ce in the specimen in a manner known per se. Specifically, it is contemplated that the adhesin polypeptides of a uropathogenic strain of E. coli, the amino acid sequences of which are given above, may be used to thus identify women who produce larger amounts of the globoside receptor in their urinary tract and who are therefore assumed to be predisposed for urinary tract infections . This aspect of the invention can be expressed generally as a method of determining receptor density or distribution in a host mammal such as a human, comprising treating a tissue sample from the host with a receptor- specific polypeptide, removing unbound receptor-specific polypeptide and determining the amount of receptor-specific polypep- tide bound. The determination of the amount of polypeptide bound may either be made by labelling the polypeptide or by incubating the specimen with a labelled antibody, such as described above. This method of the invention is very advantageous compared to pre¬ vious methods where the receptor density or receptor distribution was determined by means of an antibody which was directed against the specific receptors, the reason being that the receptor-specific poly¬ peptide, exemplified by the adhesin polypeptide, can bind to the specific receptor, whether the receptor itself, which is usually one or two sugars, is at the end of a chain of sugars or whether the system of two sugars is somewhere in the middle of the chain, whereas the antibody will only recognize two sugars at the end of the chain, but not the sugars in the middle. Therefore, the binding repertoire of the antibody is limited as compared with the adhesin polypeptide and any attempt to quantify a receptor density will be always underesti- mated when using antibody for direct combination with the receptors . Finally, an aspect of the invention relates to a method for preventing or reducing the possibility of infection of a human being or other mammal with a pathogenic adhesin-binding microorganism, the method comprising treating the human being or other mammal with, one or more adhesin polypeptides in a suitable method to distribute the polypeptides over the cell surfaces for which infection with a specific pathogenic bacteria is to be prevented, the adhesin polypeptide used being an adhesin polypeptide that will bind with the receptors with which the adhesin generated by the pathogenic bacteria will bind . I n this case the adhesin polypeptide is not used as an antigen, but as a direct preventive therapeutic agent to occupy the receptors, thus making it impossible for the pathogenic bacteria to bind to the recep¬ tor. I n most topical infections , the fi rst step is a specific binding to the specific cell surface of adhesin polypeptide from the specific bacteria, which means that when the receptors are al ready occupied, the first step in a process to develop an infection cannot take place. With the bacteria being unable to bind, the infection does not occur. DESCRI PTION OF THE DRAWI NG The invention is fu rther described with reference to the drawings in which Fig . 1 is a map which shows the genetic organization of Pap DNA in pRHU845. The upper line shows the size (in kilobase pai rs) of the fcoRI fragment inserted in plasmid pACYC184. The positions for various Tn5 insertions are given above. The restriction map of pRHU845 and the positions for identified pap genes are given . The thick vertical bar represents the region coding for the signal peptide. The designations under the bars refer to the molecular weights (x 10 3 dalton units) of the mature polypeptides . Fig . 2 shows the restriction maps and genetic organization of pap hybrid plasmids used for in vitro mutagenesis . Plasmid pPAP5 carries the entire fco I -Sσ/nH I fragment necessary for expression of Pap pili and digalactoside-specific agglutination of human eryth rocytes . Plasmid pPAPlδ carries only the Smal . -BamH l fragment under transcriptional control from the lacilVS promoter. Plasmid pPAP9 is identical to pPAPlδ with the exception that it does not carry the lacUV5 pro ft mmootteerr.. BBeelloo 1 w the horizontal line, Ap denotes ampicillin resistance (100 μg/ml) . Fig . 3 shows the whole pap region as found in pPAP5 or pPAP22 (top half) . pPAP22 is identical to pPAP5 except that it lacks the SσmH I - Pvu\ l part of the vector DNA . This plasmid is the parent of the papAI derivative pPAP23. Also the position of the papA1 mutation is shown . The lower part of the figure shows the physical map of the Sma\ , -BamH I region . The positions of the Tn5 insertions in this re- * gion are shown . All destroy the capacity to mediate hemagglutination . Below this, the positions of the papE, papF and papC genes are shown . The hatched area represents the putative signal peptides which are believed to be encoded by those genes . Also the positions of the papE1 , papFI and papC mutations are shown . They have been introduced separately into both pPAP5 and pPAPlδ. The construction and characterization of -the plasmids shown in the drawing are described in Materials and Methods as well as in Examples 1 -3. GENERAL MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals and enzymes Restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligase were purchased from Boeh rin- ger Mannheim GmbH or New England BioLabs, and used as recom- mended by the manufactu rers . Filling in of 3'-recessive ends was performed by using the Klenow fragment (New England BioLabs) in ligation buffer to which 200 yM each of the required dNTPs had been added . The Xho\ lin ker (5'-CCTCGAGG-3 * ) and Sσ H I lin ker (5'-CGGATCCG-3') were obtained from Collaborative Research and - 5'-phosphorylated as described by the manufacturers using polynu- cleotide kinase from New England Biolabs . All chemicals were of the highest purity commercially available, p-erythrocytes were kindly supplied by Dr. B . Cedergren , Blood Ban k, University Hospital , Umea . Purification of pili Pili were purified according to a modification of the method described by Brinton et al . , fmmunobiology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Washing¬ ton DC, USA, 1978, pp . 155-178. Cells were grown for 22 hours at 37°C on five trays (400 x 250 mm) containing L-agar without glucose. The cells were scraped off the trays , suspended in 340 ml ice-cold 5 mM Tris-HCI (pH 8.0) and blended for 10 minutes on ice in a Sorvall Omnimixer at setting 4. After pelletation of the cells and cellular debris (twice for 30 minutes at 20,000 ~ g) , ammonium sulfate was added to the supernatant to 55% saturation and pili were allowed to precipitate on ice overnight. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 5 mM Tris (pH 8.0) . After dialysis overnight against the same buffer at 4°C, non-dissolved material was removed by centrifugation for 30 minutes at 40,000 x g . The precipi¬ tation-dialysis procedure was repeated an additional three times (pre- cipitation for 3 hours) after which pili were precipitated by adding 0.2 volumes of 1 M MgCI 2 -1 .5 M NaCI-100 mM Tris-HCI (pH 7.5) . The precipitate was dissolved to a protein concentration of 2 mg/ml as measu red according, to Lowry et al . , J. Biol . Che . 193, 1951 , pp . 920-929. The yield was about 15 mg for the wild-type and 2-30 mg for the mutants . Receptor binding assays For slide agglutination, bacterial cells grown for 22 hours on glu- cose-free L-agar were suspended to about 10 1 0 cells/ml in agglutina¬ tion buffer (150 mM NaCI 10 mM Tris-HCI pH 7.5) containing 3% heparinϊzed and washed human erythrocytes . The reaction, when positive, was usually apparent within 60 seconds . The positive reac¬ tion was a macroscopically visible aggregation of eryth rocytes . I n the semiquantitative assay, cells grown as above were resuspended to an A βnn = 20. They were then serially 2-fold diluted in 50 μl agglutination buffer using microtiter plates with conical -bottom wells (Linbro/- Titertek, cat. no. 76-321 -05, CT, USA) . To this was added 10 μl of a 3% erythrocyte suspension in the same buffer. The dilution in the last well giving a positive agglutination after 2 hours at 4°C was taken as the agglutination titer. The cell count of the original suspension was used together with the titer, to calculate the minimum bacterial con¬ centration required for agglutination . The agglutination titer of purified pili was determined essentially in the same way as that used for whole cells . When using agglutination buffer, however, the pilus concentration required for agglutination was very high and various attempts were made to increase the sensi¬ tivity of the assay. Since pili are negatively charged at physiological pH and aggregate in the presence of 167 mM MgC (see Purification of pili) , a wild-type pilus preparation was titrated at increasing MgCL concentrations, using P. -erythrocytes containing the globosrde receptor (including the digalactoside) , and p-erythrocytes which lack this carbohydrate. The agglutination titer was found to increase 128-fold when the MgCl- concentration was increased to 100 mM. This was paralleled by an increase of .QQ of a 200 μg/ml pilus solution in the same buffers . With CaC and 10-fold higher concentrations of NH I , the same results are obtained, suggesting that the effect is on pilus-pilus interaction and not on specific receptor binding. I n addition , the agglutination titer of whole piliated cells is- not signifi¬ cantly affected by the addition of MgCL up to 200 mM . Also the increase in agglutination titer using p-eryth rocytes shows that un- specific pilus-eryth rocyte aggregation is favou red by the addition of 2+ Mg ions, although the specificity of the assay ( P. -titer over p-titer) seems to be unaffected . All titrations of pilus preparations were therefore made in agglutination buffer with 100 mM MgCL to give a semiquantitative value for specific agglutination . Antibody production Preimmune sera were obtained from two healthy 1 .8 kg female New Zealand white rabbits by cardiac puncture, filter sterilized and stored at -20°C. 75 μg of pu rified Pap pili in 1 .0 ml of isotonic saline was emulsified with an equal volume of Freund's complete adjuvant and injected in 0.5 ml amounts into fou r sites, namely subscapularly at two sites and intramuscularly into the two hind legs . After 6 weeks, a booster injection with Freund's complete adjuvant was given . Ten days after the second immunization , the animals were bled by cardiac punctu re, and the serum was filter sterilized and stored with 0.02% sodium azide at -20°C . Pilus antigen assay For slide agglutination , bacteria were grown and prepared as de¬ scribed for the hemagglutination assays . Agglutination tests of whole cells were performed with 500-fold diluted ( PBS pH 7.5) antiserum raised against purified Pap pili (cf. above) . The positive reaction was determined as a macroscopically visible aggregation of bacteria which appeared within 60 seconds . Protein expression in minicells Plasmid pPAP5 and its derivatives were transformed to the minicell- producing strain P678-54 (Adler et al . , Proc. Natl . Acad . Sci . USA 57, 1967, pp. 321 -326) . Preparation and labelling of plasmid-contain- ing minicells with [ 3 5 S] methionine were as described by Thompson and Achtman , Mol . Cen. Genet. 165, 1978, pp . 295-304. The radioactive samples were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis (cf . below) . The gels were subsequently fixed, stained, enhanced (En¬ hance, New England Nuclear) and autoradiographed . Molecular weight standards (Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Uppsala, Sweden) and purified pilin were electrophoresed in parallel . SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Radioactive samples were suspended in 100 μl of sampling buffer containing 62.5 mM Tris-HCI (pH 6.8) . 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) , 0.5% β-mercaptoethanol , and 10% glycerol . After 5 minutes of boiling, the extracts were electrophoresed in 15% polyacrylamide slab gels containing 0.1% SDS (Laemmli, Nature 227, 1970, pp . 680-685. Protein standards with molecular weights ranging from 3,000 to 94,000 were run in parallel . After fixation , staining and destaining (G rund- strδm et al . , J. Bacteriof. 143, 1980, pp. 1 127-1134) , the gel was fluorographed by using En 3 Hance (New England Nuclear Corp. , Boston, Massachusetts) . Transposon mutagenesis Transposon mutagenesis with Tn5 was performed essentially as de- scribed by Bjδrk and Olsen, Ada Chem. Scan . Ser. B 33, 1979, pp. 591 -593, with phage λ cl g57 b221 re : : Tn5. Cell extracts Cells of strain P678-54 containing various hybrid plasmids were grown on tryptic soy agar in the presence of the appropriate antibiotics. Bacteria were harvested after overnight growth at 37°C suspended in PBS (pH 7.2) -Brij®-35 to a cell density of 1 .5 absorbance units at 560 nm, and collected by centrifugation (12,000 x g for 10 minutes) . The cell pellet was next suspended in 400 μl of 1% Nonidet P-40-1% sodium deoxycholate-0. 1% SDS-0. 15 m NaCI-0.01 M Tris-HCI (pH 7.2) containing lysozyme at 1 mg/ml and was incubated for 10 minutes at 4°C (26) . A 400 μl sample of a 1/15,000 dilution of Pap antisera was added to the cell extract. After incubation at 4°C for 16 hou rs , the cell extract antibody mixture was clarified by centrifugation (12,000 x g for 10 minutes) . Competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (.ELISA) Disposable microtiter hemagglutination plates (Cooke polystyrene, 96 U wells) were exposed to 100 μl of a 1 μg/ml solution of purified Pap pili per well in 0. 1 M sodium carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) for 16 hou rs at 25°C. The wells were washed th ree" times with 0. 15 M NaCI con¬ taining 0.05% (vol/vol) Brij®-35 (Sigma) to remove unbound pili . Anti- Pap pilus rabbit antiserum was diluted in PBS (pH 7.2) with 0.05% (vol/vol) Brij®-35 to a concentration which resulted in 50% maximal binding (1/30,000 dilution) and was then mixed with serial dilutions in PBS-Brij® lysates of whole bacteria, cell-free extracts, or Pap pili (positive control) , or without added pili (negative control) . After incubation for 16 hours at 4°C, 100 μl samples were transferred to the sensitized microtiter wells . The plates were incubated for 3 hou rs at 37°C and were then washed th ree times with NaCI- Brij®. Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti- rabbit immunoglobulin G diluted 1/1 ,000 in PBS- Brij® was added to all wells and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C . The plates were washed th ree times with PBS- Brij®, and 1 mg of p-nitrophenylphosphate (Sigma) per ml in 1 .0 M di- ethanolamine buffer (pH 9.8) was added to each well and incubated for 20 minutes at 37°C . The reaction was stopped by the addition of 2 N NaOH , and absorbance at 405 nm was determined with an MR 580 MicroELI SA autoreader (Dynatech 01 1 -960-0000; Dynatech Labora¬ tories, Alexarideria, Virginia) . Immunoprecipitation Immunoprecipitation of [ 3 S S]methionine-labelled, plasmid-encoded pro¬ teins was performed essentially as described by Dallas and Falkow, Nature 277, 1979, pp. 406-407, with the exception that pure Staphy- lococcus aureus Protein A bound to Sepharose® was used instead of Staphylococcus aureus cells . Western blotting Western blotting after SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of puri¬ fied pili was performed as described by Swanson et al . , Infect. Immun. 38, 1982, pp. 668-672. Diluted Pap antiserum raised against pili purified from strain P678-54 harbouring plasmid pRHU845 (en¬ zyme-linked immune sorbent assay titer, 1 : 1 ,000) was used . Construction of plasmid derivatives The 9.6 kb long EcoRI -SσmH l fragment of pRHU30, containing all the genes necessary for the expression of Pap pili and digalactoside-spe- cific binding, was cloned into EcoRI - and SσmH I -digested pBR322 (Bolivar et al . , Gene 2, 1977, pp. 95-113) giving pPAP5 (cf . Fig . 2) . To construct a derivative lacking the PvuW site in the pBR322 part of the molecule, the vector was PvuW digested and ligated to a 20-fold excess of SσmH I linker. This DNA was subsequently cut with EcoRI and SσmH I , and the largest fragment carrying nucleotides 2065-4360 of pBR322 (Sutcliffe, DNA: Replication and Recombination 43, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1978, pp. 77-90) was isolated from a 0.7% agarose gel . This fragment, ligated to the EcoRI - SσmH I from pRHU30, was transformed (Mandel and Higa, J . Moi . Biol . 53, 1970, 159-162) into E. coli strain HB101 (Boyer and Rouiland- Dussoix, J. Moi. Biol. 41, 1969, pp. 459-472) . The isolated clone was named pPAP22 and is identical to pPAP5 except that the clone lacks the Bam \ -Pvu\ \ segment. A derivative, pPAP23, carrying a frame- shift mutation at the single PvuW site in pσpA was constructed by linearizing pPAP22 with PvuW and ligating it to a 20-fold excess of Xho\ linker. After digestion for 3 hours using 20 units of XΛol/μg of DNA, the fragment was purified on a Sephadex® G150 column (Phar¬ macia Fine Chemicals, Uppsala, Sweden) equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCI pH 8.0 and 1 mM EDTA. After lϊgation and transformation into E. coli strain HB101 , DNA from six clones was isolated (Birnboim and Doly, Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 1979, pp . 1513-1523) and analyzed . Five of the clones had a new Xho\ site at the former Pvαl l site and one of these was called pPAP23 and used in further studies . The following manipulations were done to construct plasmid pPAP16 (Fig. 2) and derivatives of both this plasmid and pPAP5 with muta¬ tions in the Sma\. -SσmHI region. Plasmid pPAP1 was constructed by linearizing 2 μg of pBR322 with C/σl, and blunt ends were created using 5 units of Klenow fragment and 200 μM each of dGTP and dCTP (15 minutes at 30°C in ligation buffer). This DNA was, after heat inactivation of the enzyme, ligated to the gel-purified Smσ -Smσ fragment of pPAP5 (Fig. 2), and by screening small-scale plasmid preparations, a plasmid carrying the fragment in the same orientation relative to the vector as on pPAP5, was isolated. The clone pPAPI expressed the last polypeptide (35 kd) in a slightly truncated form. Thus the gene for this polypeptide extends beyond the Sma\^ site and is present in a truncated form in pPAPI. This mutation was isolated on a Kpn\-BamH\ fragment which was ligated into pPAP5 cut with these enzymes. The derivative, ρPAP7 obtained in this way thus contains pap DNA up to the Sma\^ site. Plasmid pPAP9, containing the whole S σL-SσmHI region was constructed by ligating the Kpn\- Bam Ϊ fragment of pPAP5 in excess to Afpπl-SσmHI digested pPAPI. To make frameshift mutations in the insert of pPAP9, this plasmid was partially digested with HincW in the presence of 150 μg/ml ethidium bromide (Greenfield et al., Biochim. Biophys. Ada 407, 1975, pp. 365-375). Linearized plasmid was then isolated from a 0.7% agarose gel and ligated to an excess of Xho\ linkers. After Xho\ digestion, Sepha- dex® G150 gel chromatography, and ligation, the DNA was transformed into E. coli strain HB101, selecting for ampicilling resistance. The DNA purified from 23 clones was analyzed by digestion with Xho\ and Sal\. Of 15 mutants within the insert, 13 were linker insertions at HincWη and two at the HincW. site. No mutants at H/πcI were ob¬ tained. pPAP5 derivatives carrying these mutations were constructed in a way analogous to pPAP7. These plasmids were named pPAP15 (HincW.) and pPAP14 (r/ZπcI ). pPAP19 was constructed by deleting the Xho\-Sal\ fragment of pPAP14 by re-ligating an Xho\-Sal\ digest of the latter plasmid. The construction of pPAP20 from pPAP15 was done in the same manner. To make plasmid ρPAP26 (papA1 , papEI double mutant), the large Kpn\ -SσmHI fragment of pPAP23 (papAI) was ligated to the small pπl-SσmHI fragment of pPAPIO (papEI). Plasmid pPAP9 did not complement Tn5 insertions within the SmσL - SσmH I region . This was suspected to be due to insufficient tran¬ scription over the insert. Therefore the EcoRI fragment containing the /σcUV5 promoter was isolated from pSKS106 (Casabadan et al . , Methods Enzymol . 100, 1983, pp. 293-308) , and ligated in excess to EcoRI linearized pPAP9. A clone with the fragment in the correct orientation , pPAP16, was subsequently isolated by screening DNA preparations using Pst\ digestion since the promoter fragment carries an asymmetrically placed site for this enzyme. The same procedure was applied to the other pPAP9 derivatives resulting in pPAP4 CSmσ -SσmH l deletion) , pPAP18 [HincW . mutation) and pPAP17 (HincW* mutation) . EXAMPLE 1 Cloning and identification of the gene for the major pilus subunit High molecular weight chromosomal DNA from a spontaneously Lac derivative of a uropathogenic isolate of E. coli J96 (cf . R . Hull et al . . Infect. Immun. 33, 1981 , pp . 933-938; mannose-resistant hemag- + glutination (MHRA ) and digalactoside-specific binding) was isolated according to standard methods . This DNA was subsequently partially digested with the restriction endonuclease Sau3A. The restriction fragments were ligated to the plasmid vector pHC79 (Collins, Methods Enzymol. 68, 1979, pp. 309-326) which had previously been linearized with the restriction endonuclease SσmH I . This DNA was in vitro packaged into λ phage particles according to the procedure described by B . Holm, Methods in Enzymology 68, 1979, pp. 1127-1134. These particles were used to infect E. coli strain P678-54 (Adler et al . , op. cit. ) . The bacteria were then spread on plates containing ampicil- lin leading to the formation of colonies containing the recombinant plasmid which is ampicilliπ-resistaπt. Individual colonies were screened for agglutination of human erythro¬ cytes in the presence of 1% of mannose, and the clone (pRHU807) causing mannose-resistant hemagglutination was selected. Subclones (ρRHU30 and pRHU845) of pRHU807 were constructed retaining MRHA + as described by R . Hu ll et al . , op. cit. The presence of both of these subclones in E. coli strain H B101 also causes the formation of pili . The hemagglutination caused by E. coli strain H B101 containing pRHU845 was totally inhibited by the presence of soluble digalacto- side, both in the presence and in the absence of mannose, thus + demonstrating that in this case the MHRA phenotype expressed by this strain is identical to digalactoside-specific binding . The structural gene for the major polypeptide forming the Pap (pili associated with pyelonephritis) pilus [papA) was identified by Western blotting and immunoprecipitation from subclones and mapped to about 2.2 kb as shown in Fig . 1 . The position of the papA gene was con¬ firmed by the identity between the amino acid sequence of the gene product inferred from the DNA sequence (M. Baga et al . , J. Bac- teriol . 157, Jan . 1984, pp . 330-333) comparing it with the N-terminal sequence of the major Pap pilus subunit (cf . O'Hanley et al . , J . Exp. Med. 158, Nov . 1983, pp . 1713-1719) . EXAMPLE 2 Identification of the pilus DNA sequence To characterize the genes required for Pap pilus formation and di¬ galactoside-specific agglutination, subclones of pRHU845 and trans¬ poson Tn5 insertion mutants were constructed and analyzed as de¬ scribed in Normark et al . , Infect. Immun . 41 , Sept. 1983, pp . 942- 949. By further analysis of the Tn5 insertion mutants and subclones , it was shown that only the DNA residing between position about 1 .0 and about 9.4 kb from the left-hand EcoRI site (cf . Fig . 1 ) was necessary to code for Pap pilus formation and digalactoside-specific binding . I nsertional mutants between 7.9 and 9.2 kb from the EcoRI site (cf. Fig . 1 ) abolished digalactoside-specific binding without inhibiting the formation of Pap pili . EXAMPLE 3 Genetic character! zation of pilus adhesin DNA The region identified in Example 2 as necessary for Pap pilus forma¬ tion and digalactoside-specific binding was recloned as a 9.6 kb long EcoRI -SσmH I fragment of pRHU30 into pBR322 giving plasmids pPAP5 (see Fig . 2) and pPAP22, as descibed in Materials and Methods . Both pPAP5 and pPAP22 carry the entire EcoRI -SσmH I insert, although pPAP22, due to a deletion in vector DNA, has a unique PvuW site in the papA structural gene. Plasmid pPAP23 with a frameshift mutation , papAl , was constructed by introducing an 8 bp long Xho\ linker in the unique PvuW site in pPAP22 (cf. Fig. 3) . I n f. coli strain HB101 , this frameshift mutant, unlike the wild-type, was not agglutinated by antiserum raised against purified Pap pili . E. coli strain H B101 harbouring pPAP23 agglutinates human P, -eryth- rocytes as well as digalactoside-coated latex beads . Hence, pPAP23/- HB101 appears to express the same receptor binding specificity as HB101 carrying the wild-type pap operon on pPAP22 or pPAP5. Thus, inactivation of the pilin gene papA did not diminish the degree of digalactoside-specific agglutination in the assay employed . Tn5 insertions in the distal part of pap DNA abolish hemagglutination but allow Pap pili to be formed , ft was thus assumed that the genes mediating agglutination would be located in this region . To further investigate the importance of the polypeptides encoded here, the Sma\ . -SσmH I fragment, shown in Fig . 2, was subcloned into pBR322 (see Materials and Methods) . Since the resulting plasmid did not complement Tn5 insertions in the SmσL -SσmH I region , the cloned fragment was put under the transcriptional control of the /σcUV5 pro¬ moter (in order to ensure adequate transcription of the genes on the fragment) which was inserted into the plasmid as an EcoRI fragment derived from pSKSIOδ (see Materials and Methods) . This construct, pPAPlδ (cf . Fig . 2) , complemented the four non-hemagglutinating Tn5 mutants with insertion points in the SmσL -SσmH I fragment. The localisation of these mutants is shown in Fig . 3. To fu rther define the genes on the SmσL -SσmH I fragment, a detailed restriction map of the pPAPl δ insert was constructed with an accu rate localisation of relevant Tn5 insertions (cf. Fig . 3) . Three frameshift mutational derivatives of pPAP5 containing lesions in this - egion (cf . Fig . 3 and Materials and Methods) were also constructed . Two mutant plasmids, pPAP14 and pPAP15, carry Xho\ linkers in the H πcI L and r //7cl sites, respectively. I n a thi rd mutant, pPAP7, pap DNA from SmσL to SσmH I (cf . Fig . 3) had been deleted . The polypeptides expressed from pPAP5 and its three mutant deri- vatives were [ 3 5 S]methionine labelled in E. coli minicells, and the polypeptides expressed were analysed on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel . When compared with pPAP5, plasmid pPAP7 did not express the 35 kd polypeptide. I nstead, a new polypeptide of 34 kd appeared . Since the mutation in pPAP7 truncated the pap region at the SmσL site this would map the 3' end of the gene coding for the 35 kd polypeptide, papG, between the SmσL and the SσmHI sites (cf . Fig. 3) . This is the last gene in the pap region . The HincW j mutation in pPAP14 abolished expression of the 15 kd polypeptide, as do Tn5 insertions 002 and 021 , which accurately maps the gene papF as encoding this polypeptide (cf . Fig . 3) . No other polypeptides were affected by the H/ncI L mutation (papF) in pPAP14. The minicell preparation of the HincW. lin ker insertion mutant, pPAP15, does not produce the 16.5 kd polypeptide. The gene for this polypep¬ tide is termed papE and the frameshift mutation is referred to as papEI . The truncation of the papG gene products by the SmσL-SσmH I deletion shows that this gene is transcribed from left to right in Fig . 3. Polarity effects exerted by Tn5 insertions in papE and papF on papG show that the transcription of all th ree genes is in this direction . To confirm the position of the Tn5 mutations relative to the papF and papG genes, the Tn5 mutations 002, 021 , 026 and 042 (cf. Fig . 3) were complemented with the mutated SmσL -SσmH I region . For this purpose, papEI , papFI and papGI derivatives of pPAPlδ carrying the SmσL -SσmH I region under /σcUV5 promoter control were constructed as described in Materials and Methods . These were then transformed to E. coli strain HB101 carrying the Tn5 derivatives of ρRHU845 (Normark et al . , op. cit. ) and assayed for globoside-specific hem¬ agglutination using P.- and p -eryth ocytes . The papEI derivative complemented all Tn5 mutations as did the parent plasmid pPAPl δ. The papFI plasmid complemented Tn5 mutations 026 and 042, while the plasmid carrying papGI complemented mutations 002 and 021 . This defines the 002 and 021 Tn5 insertions as mutations in papF and shows that Tn5 insertions 026 and 042 reside in the papG gene. It also clearly shows that papF and papG are separate, independently frσπs- com piemen table genes . The genetic map of this region (shown in Fig . 3) was constructed on the basis of these data . As indicated above, Tn5 insertions in papF and papG abolish hem¬ agglutination completely, though pili are formed . To assess the indi¬ vidual importance for hemagglutination of the papE, papF and papG gene products, the non-polar linker insertion mutant derivatives of pPAP5 in hemagglutination tests . It was ' found that neither the papFI nor the papGI derivative showed any agglutination of P. -eryth ro¬ cytes, demonstrating that both the papF and the papG gene products are needed for agglutination . The papEI mutant did not by itself affect the hemagglutination titer, but surprisingly a papAl ,papE1 double mutant, pPAP26, did not agglutinate P. -eryth rocytes when transformed to E. coli strain HB101 . The pilus antigen formation and digalactoside-specific binding proper¬ ties of the various mutant derivatives of pPAP5 or pPAP22 in E. coli strain HB101 are summarized in Table I . Table I Characteristics of plasmids used for mapping and functional analyses of papA, papE , papF and papG Plasmid Relevant genotype Phenotype Pilus-antigen Hemagglutination pSN002 papF: : Tn5-002 PSN021 papF: : Tn5-021 PSN026 pσpC : : Tn5-026 PSN042 pσpC : :Tn5-042 PPAP5 wild-type PPAP15 papEI PPAP14 papFI pPAP7 papGI PPAP20 papEI , LpapF-G PPAP19 papFI , papG PPAP22 wild-type PPAP23 pap A 1 pPAP26 papAl , papEI PPAP9 LpapB-D pPAPI papB-D, papGI PPAP16 LpapB-D, pPAP18 LpapB-D, σc V5 , papEI PPAP17 LpapB-D, /σcP V c/ papFI PPAP4 papB-D, lacP. . .m, papGI pSN plasmids are pACYC184 derivatives (carrying the EcoRI fragment from pRHU845; each plasmid contains a different Tn5 insertion as shown in Fig . 1 ) , whereas pPAP plasmids are derivatives of pBR322. Pilus antigen was determined by slide agglutination of a cell suspension with antisera raised against Pap pili . It appears from the table that mutation papAl in pPAP23 completely abolished the formation of the major Pap pilus subunit (the papA gene product) without affecting digalactoside-specific binding . Conversely, mutation papFI in pPAP14 and papGI in pPAP7 abolished digalacto¬ side-specific binding without inhibiting the formation of Pap pili . 3δ Mutations in genes papC and papD abolished both pilus formation and digalactoside-specific binding . Only mutations in papF and papG lead to the abolition of the digalactoside-specific binding without preven¬ ting the formation of Pap pili . The only exception is the . double mu- tant papA1-papE1 which is negative for agglutination as described above. Mutations in papA or papE only are adherent. This effect is assumed to be ascribable to the fact that the papA or papE polypep¬ tides are (presumably) required to anchor the adhesin to the cell wall . It may therefore be concluded that the papF and/or papG genes encode the digalactoside-specific adhesion . EXAMPLE 4 Establishing the DNA sequence of the pilus adhesin DNA 100 μg of pPAP9 (constructed as described in Materials and Methods ; shown in Fig . 2) was digested with EcoRI and SσmH I and subjected to preparative agarose gel electrophoresis in order to isolate the EcoRl- SσmH I fragment containing the SmσL -SσmHI region (cf. Fig . 3) . Aliquots of this fragment were digested with the endonucleases r σel l l , Rsaϊ , Alu\ , HpaW , Sau3A, Taq\ , HincW and BglW separately or in combination . Fragments obtained were either cloned directly or after preparative agarose gel electrophoresis, and fragment isolation per¬ formed into phage M13 vectors (M13mp8 and M13mp9; Messing et al . , Nucleic Acids Res . 9, 1981 , pp . 309-321 ) . The inserts were sequen- ced using the method of Sanger et al . , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 1977, pp . 5463-5467 (dideoxy sequencing) until unambiguous over- lapping readings of the DNA sequence of the SmσL -SσmHI fragment were obtained for both strands . EXAMPLE 5 Amino acid sequencing of the pilus adhesins Among the possible reading frames , the genes papE , papF and papG were identified from the known position of the genes established by means of lin ker and transposon Tn5 insertions (cf . Fig . 3) and the known size of their respective gene products, 16.5 kd, 15 kd and 35 kd, respectively . The N-terminal ends of these genes were identi¬ fied . The amino acid sequence was derived from the DNA sequence using the genetic code established for E. coli. Since all the gene products are made as precu rsors containing single peptides , the 5'-end of the gene was assumed to be a methionine followed by a signal peptide-like sequence (G . von Heijne, European Journal of Biochemistry 133, 1983, pp . 17-21 ) . EXAMPLE 6 Homology with other uropathogenic E. coli DNA Several fragments from the SmσL -SσmH I region were isolated and 3 2 P-Iabelled by nick translation . The fragments were selected so as to cover the enti re region in small segments . These were then used as probes in Southern blots of digests of plasmids pDC5 (Clegg and Pierce, Infect. Immun. 42, 1983, pp . 900-906) and pPI LHO-35 (van Die et al . , FEMS Mlcrobiol . Letters 19, 1983, pp . 77-82) under strin¬ gent conditions . Strong hybridization signals were obtained with probes from the papE and papF genes whereas no signals were ob¬ tained from the papG gene region . Strong hybridization under strin- gent conditions were also obtained from a probe- of the papC gene between the Hpa\ sites at about 3.2-3.4 kb from the EcoRI site (cf . Fig . 1 ) . Detailed restriction maps of pDC5 and pPI LI IO-35 were constructed and found to be nearly identical with the restriction map of pPAP5 with respect to the papC and papD regions. A lesser, though still high degree of similarity was observed for the papE and papF genes . + It may therefore be concluded that the DNA which encodes MRHA in other u ropathogenic strains of E. coli is very similar to that cloned in pPAP5 (derived from E. coli strain J96) and that results .obtained in the Pap system can be generalized to most pyeloneph ritogenic strains . As regards pPI LHO-35, it has also been demonstrated that the MRHA expressed from its DNA is digalactoside-specific. Similar results were obtained with chromosomal DNA from clinical isolates by the present inventors as well as by other researchers (cf . Low et al . , Infect. Immun . 43, 1984, pp . 353-358) . EXAMPLE 7 Construction of a fusion between the papG gene and the lacZ gene Plasmid ρPAP9 was digested with BglW and Sal\ (located about 375 bp to the right of the SσmH I site in pPAP9) . The resulting fragment was ligated to plasmid pMC874 (Casabadan et al . , J. Baderiol. 143, 1980, pp. 971 -980) which had previously been digested with SσmHI and Sail . After transformation to pMCIOδl (Casabadan et al . , op. cit. ) and plating on plates containing 100 μg/ml of ampicillin , recombinants were analyzed . A plasmid, pHMG51 , consisting of pPAP9 in which the S /l l -Sσ/I fragment had been replaced by the /σc-casette from pMC874 (the SσmH I -Sσ/1 fragment) was isolated and shown by mrnϊcell analysis as described in Materials and Methods to code for a papG-lacZ fusion peptide. This result was also expected from the known sequence of the pσpG gene and that of the lacZ gene as present in pMC874. I NSTRUCTIONS A. Preparation of other fused genes I n an alternative method to that disclosed in Example 7, N-terminal DNA fragments comprising the papF gene are obtained by linearizing pPAP9 with BglW . This DNA is then incubated for increasing periods of time with the exonuclease E olll and then treated with nuclease SI resulting in increasing deletions from the BglW site. Hind\W linkers are attached. This DNA is then redigested with S σl and HindWl and subjected to preparative agarose gel electrophoresis. Fragments rang- ing from 1,400 to 1,000 bp (cf. Fig. 3) are isolated and ligated into the appropriate fusion vector which has previously been digested with Smσl and Hind\W as described below. Fragments containing the papG gene are constructed by the method described above, but by digesting with SσmHI instead of BglW. Fragments ranging from 2,400 to 1,500 bp on the gel (cf. Fig. 3) are selected. Fragments containing the papE gene are constructed in the same manner, selecting fragments ranging from 800-400 bp (cf. Fig. 3). DNA fragments encoding the N-terminal portion of the papF gene are cloned into a fusion vector such as pSKS104, pSKS105 or pSKSIOδ (Casadaban et al., Methods in Enzymology 100, 1983, pp. 293-308) so as to create gene fusions with the lacZ gene. The fused gene in these constructions is transcribed by the lacUV5 promoter. This construction is transformed to a strain containing the Lacl~ gene, e.g. E. coli strain JM103 (Messing et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 1981, pp. 309-321), selecting for ampicillin resistance. This strain is then grown in a suitable medium such LB-broth (G. Bertani, J. Baderiol. 62, 1951, pp. 293-300) to an optical density of OD finn = ~-^- Transcription of the fused gene is then induced by adding IPTG (J. Miller, Experiments in Molecular Genetics, Cold Spring Har¬ bor, New York, 1972). Incubation is continued until maximum expres¬ sion of the fused gene product has been obtained. The cells are then harvested and the fused gene product is purified by standard methods using an assay for β-galactosidase activity (cf. J. Miller, op. cit.). The purified fusion product may then be used directly in vaccine tests in e.g. rodents, monkeys or swine. B . Preparation of a vaccine The entire papE, papF or papG gene products or appropriate frag¬ ments thereof for use as vaccine are prepared in either of the -following ways: 1 . The pu rified fusion proteins of the lacZ gene and papE, papF or papG genes are digested with a suitable protease, e.g. trypsin or chymotrypsin , or a chemical reagent such as cyanogen bromide or hydroxyl amiπe. The desired peptide is obtained from the resulting peptide mixture by standard techniques, e. g. ion exchange chroma- tography or HPLC reverse phase ch romatography. 2. Alternatively, antibodies against the fusion proteins are raised by injecting these into rabbits. The resulting antibodies can be used for the pu rification of the non -fused, pure papE, papF or papG gene products from a lacZ bacterium containing a plasmid carrying these genes . This plasmid may be a pBR322 derivative such as pPAP5 or pPAPl δ, or a runaway plasmid derivative such as pBEU28 (Uhlin et al . , Gene 22, 1983, pp. 255-265) . The pu rification is performed either by immunoaffinity gel chroma¬ tography or the antibody is used to develop an ELI SA assay which is used to detect the polypeptides when developing a pu rification proto¬ col (cf . Materials and Methods) . Fragments of these purified polypeptides may, if desired, be obtained by cleavage with protease etc. as described under 1 . 3. Fragments consisting of 5-30 amino acids or more of the papE, papF and papG gene products are synthesized by solid phase peptide synthesis (Stewart and Young, Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis , Free¬ man & Co. , San Francisco, USA, 1969) . They may then be used for vaccination as such or coupled to a carrier molecule of a physiologi¬ cally acceptable carrier such as poly-L-lysine or poly-D, L-alanine with or without an adjuvant substantially as described in Arnon, J. I mmunologicaf Methods 61 , 1983, pp . 261 -273. C . The Pseudomonas system Assuming that pilus formation and adhesion are lin ked in Pseudomonas species, ch romosomal DNA from an adhering strain of Pseudomonas is digested with a restriction endonuclease to produce fragments which are cloned into a pBR322 derivative, a Pseudomonas IE . coil shuttle vector, a plasmid vector or a phage vector and transformed/trans- fected into E. coli. The bacteria harbou ring the hybrid vector are screened for production of the major Pseudomonas pili subunit using antibodies raised against the pu rified Pseudomonas pili . (This has been done for N . gonorrhea using pBR322 as a vector; cf . Meyer et al . , Cell 30, 1982, pp. 45-52) . This' clone is then used di rectly or as a probe to obtain a larger DNA fragment containing the pilin gene. This fragment is then cloned into a Pseudomonas/ E . coli shuttle vector which is transferred into a non-piliated, non-adhering strain of Pseudomonas which is then as¬ sayed for adhesion and pilus formation . Mutagenesis of this fragment is then performed in essentially the same way as described in Example 2 with respect to u ropathogenic E. coli with the exception that the phenotypic assays are carried out in Pseudomonas instead. Alternatively, if the chromosomal DNA is cloned directly into a Pseu¬ domonas vector or a Pseudomonas/E . coli shuttle vector and trans¬ formed to a non-adhering strain of Pseudomonas, the clones can be screened for adhesion directly . Other assays may be used, for in¬ stance binding of the soluble receptor. Fusion proteins and protein production in E. coli is performed in simi¬ lar ways to those described above, though possibly transcription and translation initiation signals must be altered synthetically. Alternative¬ ly, protein production may be performed in a homologous system in Pseudomonas using e. g . the broad host range Tac promoter vectors described by Bagdasarian et al . , Gene 26, 1983, pp. 273-282. DNA sequencing and amino acid analysis is carried out essentially as de¬ scribed in Examples 4 and 5 above, and on the basis of the sequence analysis, synthetic peptides may be produced as described above. Similar methods as those described in Examples 1 -5 as well as those outlined for Pseudomonas may be used to identify and produce puta¬ tive adhesin polypeptides from other adhering bacteria such as Neis¬ seria species, etc. In principle, all investigations may be carried out using protein che¬ mistry. The adhesin polypeptides may be en riched/purified by recep¬ tor, e. g . digalactoside, affinity ch romatography or any other appro¬ priate method (such as antibody affinity ch romatography) . The pu rity of the protein may be assayed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electropho- resis as described in Materials and Methods . To ensure that the adhesins constitute a large fraction of the preparation , equilibrium dialysis experiments with the radioactively labelled receptor may be employed to calculate the number of binding sites per molecule of protein present. This is expected to be between 0.1 and 10 ligands per molecule of protein . EXAMPLE 8 MATERIALS AND METHODS USED IN THIS EXAMPLE Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions All bacterial strains are E. coli K12 derivatives, except the clinical isolates described in Table 2. For protein expression analyses a recA derivative of P678-54 (1 ) , AA10 was used . M13 cloning and phage propagation was carried out in JM103. HB101 was the host in all other experiments . Plasmid pPAP5 (cf . General Materials and Methods above) is a pBR322 derivative carrying a 9.5 kb EcoR I -SσmH I ch romosomal fragment isolated from E. coli J96. This clone expresses an F"CI34.3" pilus antigen which is serologically related to FI2. The gene map of the pap cluster is shown in Fig. 1 . Plasmid pDC5 is a pACYC184 derivative carrying an 8.0 kb C/σl -SσmH I fragment of E. coli IA2, whereas pPI L110-35 is a pACYC184 derivative containing a 16 kb EcoRI fragment isolated from E. coli AD1 10 responsible for the formation of F7~ pilus antigen . The following concentrations of antibiotics were used for selection : carbenicillin 100 μg/ml, tetracycline 15 μg/ml , kanamycin 20 μg/ml and chloramphenicol 20 μg/ml . Bacteria were grown at 37°C in Lu ria broth or on Luria agar. General procedures The CaCL procedure was used for transformation . Plasmid DNA was isolated by a modification of the alkaline clear lysate procedure of Birnboim H . C . and J . Doly ("A rapid alkaline extraction procedu re for screening recombinant plasmid DNA" Nuclear Acids Res. 7, 1979, pp. 1513-1523) and G rosveld et al . (" Isolation of β-globin-related genes from a human cos id library", Gene 13, 1981 , pp . 227-237) fol¬ lowed by two consecutive ethidium bromide/CsCI equilibrium centrifu- gations . Restriction endonucleases were used under the conditions re¬ commended by the manufactu rers (New England BioLabs, USA, Boeh- ringer Mannheim GmbH or Bethesda Research Laboratories GmbH) . Di¬ gested DNA was separated on 0.5% to 1 .5% (wt/vol) agarose gels . Phage λ DNA and phage #X174 DNA cleaved with Hindl W and Hσel l l , respectively (New England BioLabs) were used as molecular weight standards . DNA fragments were obtained in pure form by electroelution from 5% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gels . Blotting and hybridization procedures 32 [ P] -labelled DNA probes were prepared by nick-translation or by priming DNA synthesis of cloned M13 single stranded DNA templates with an M13 hybridization probe primer (New England BioLabs) . 32 [α P]dGTP (Amersham, England) was incorporated to a specific o activity of approximately 1χ10 cpm/μg . Plasmid DNA, size fractionated on agarose gels, was transferred to nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher and Schϋll , BA85) according to Southern , E. M . , "Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis", J. Moi. Biol. 98, 1975, pp. 503-517. The blotted filters were prehybridized for 2 hours at 68°C in a hybridization solution consisting of: 4 χ SSC (IxSSC is 150 mM NaCI; 15 mM Na citrate pH 7.0) , 10 χ Denhardt's solution, 0.1% SDS, 2 mM EDTA and sonicated calf thymus DNA at 50 g μg/ml . Radiolabelled probe in fresh hybridization solution (1 χ 10 cpm/ l) was then added to the filters which were incubated for 18 hours in plastic bags . For stringent conditions, hybridization was performed at 68°C, and washes were conducted at the same temperature in salt concentrations from 2 χ SSC; 0. 1% SDS down to 0. 1 χ SSC; 0. 1% SDS. Non-stringent hybridization was carried out under similar condi¬ tions, except that the hybridization temperature was 55°C and that washes were done in 2 ~ SSC. Filters were exposed overnight to Dupont Cronex 4 X-ray film with an intensifying screen . Analyses of protein expression in minicells Plasmids pPAP5, pPAP502, ρDC5 and ρPI L10-35 were transformed into the minicell producing strain AA10. Preparation and labelling of mini- 35 cells with [ S] -methionine (Amersham) was as described by Thompson , R . , and M . Achtman , "The control region of the F sex factor DNA transfer cistrons : restriction mapping and DNA cloning" , Moi. Gen . Genet. 165, 1978, pp . 295-304. The radioactive samples were separated on linear 15% (wt/vol) SDS-polyacrylamide gels . The gels were sub¬ sequently fixed, stained, destained, enhanced (Enhance, New England Nuclear GmbH) and exposed to X-ray film for 1 -6 days . Molecular weight standards were from Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Sweden . Nucleotide sequence determination Relevant fragments were cloned into phage M13 cloning vectors M13mp8 and M13mp9 and transformed into E. coli strain JM103. Single stranded template DNA was isolated from the phage as described by Messing et al . "A system for shotgun DNA sequencing" , Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 1981 , pp . 309-321 . The DNA sequences were determined by the dideoxy chain termination method of Sanger et al . , "DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors" , Proc. Natl. Acad . Sci . USA 74, 1977, pp. 5463-5467, utilizing the M13 pentadecamer sequencing primer (New England BioLabs) . Receptor binding assays The binding properties of the gene products encoded by the plasmids listed in Tables 1 and 2 were determined by slide agglutination as de¬ scribed in General Materials and Methods above using P- -eryth rocytes containing the globoside receptor and p-eryth rocytes which lack the globoside. Pilus antigen assay Slide agglutination, utilizing antisera raised against purified Pap pili (37) were performed as described in General Materials and Methods above. Antiserum was used as a 500-fold dilution in PBS (pH 7.5) . Construction of plasmid derivatives for complementation analyses Plasmid pPAP43 is a derivative of pPAP5, obtained by Smσl digestion followed by ligation at low DNA concentration . This plasmid lacks the SmσL -SmσL region of ρPAP5 (Fig . 1 ) and consequently carries only the genes papB and papA . I n order to construct the cutback deriva¬ tive pPAP502, plasmid pDC5 (Fig . 1 ) was completely digested with BglW , and partially digested with SσmH I , followed by religation and transformation into H B101 . Plasmid DNA was isolated from the trans- formants and screened for the calculated size. One clone, pPAP502, with the correct size was further analyzed and as expected, the papG gene was absent (cf . Table 3) . Plasmid pPAP503 was constructed by ligating an EcoR\ -Hind\ W fragment from pS KS106 carrying the lac promoter and the rightmost W/π l I I -SσmH I fragment of pDC5 to pBR322 digested with EcoRI and SσmH L Plasmid pPAP504 was obtained by digesting pPAP503 with BglW and SσmH I , followed by religation at low DNA concentration . The plasmid pPAP507 was constructed by cloning the Hindϊ W fragment of pDC5 carrying the . genes equivalent to papA, papH and papC into the unique Hind\ W site of pPAP503 selecting for ampicillin resistance and screening for hemagglutination . This inter- mediate (pPAP506) was subsequently digested with BglW and SσmH I followed by religation giving pPAP507 in a manner analogous to the construction of pPAP504 from pPAP503. Electron microscopy Electron microscopy was performed using a JEOL 100B microscope with 100 mesh copper grids coated with thin films of 2% formvar. Bacteriz were resuspended in 10 mM Tris HCI (pH 7.5) ; 10 mM MgCL and placed on the grid. The excess was immediately removed by aid of a filter paper. Grids were then washed with buffer and negatively stained for 5 seconds with 3.55% ammonium molybdate followed by washing with redistilled water. RESU LTS Structural comparison of pPAPS to pDC5 and pPIL 10-35 All three plasmids were shown to encode globoside-binding specificity (Table 2) . The ch romosomal inserts of the plasmids were mapped with several restriction endonucleases . To allow the detection of even small discrepancies in fragment size, the restriction enzyme digests of the different plasmids were analyzed in parallel slots by aga rose gel elec¬ trophoresis . As shown in Fig . 1 , the central Sma\ . -Kpn\ fragment is of the same size (4.6 kb) in all three plasmids . I n pPAP5 this frag- ment codes for part of an additional gene as well as for the papC and papD genes . No differences were found in the physical map of this central fragment. Fu rthermore, a Pst\ fragment, approximately 370 bp in size and derived from the coding region of papC in pPAP5, hybri¬ dizes to a Pst\ fragment of equal size in pDC5 and pPI L110-35. Li ke- wise, a 128 bp Hpσl fragment from the N-termina! region of papC hybridizes to identically sized Hpa\ fragments from pDC5 and pPI LHO- 35. These observations show that the central region of the globoside- binding gene clusters, believed to encode export and assembly func¬ tions, is highly conserved . Plasmid pP I L110-35 carries a 5.7 kb DNA fragment that extends left¬ wards of the conserved Sma\ . -Kpn\ region . This region encompasses the structu ral gene for the F7~ pilin , wh ich holds a position equiva¬ lent to papA . The restriction site homology is not conserved in this region ( Fig . 1 ) . Also, a 221 nucleotide long probe from the central region of papA gave only a weak hybridization signal with pPI L110-35 even at low stringency, although the very 5' region of papA hybri¬ dized strongly under stringent conditions . This implies that the 5' end of the two pilin genes is highly conserved, whereas the central region appears to have diverged markedly. A DNA probe derived conventionally from the coding part of papB gave a strong hybridization signal with the 6.0 kb Hindl W fragment of pPI LHO-35, ' suggesting that this gene is conserved and is present in equivalent positions in the two clones . Th ree genes, papE, papF and papG , have been mapped to the SmσL- SσmH I fragment of pPAP5. The restriction pattern of this fragment is less conserved in pDC5 and pPI LHO-35 than is the central Sma\ . -Kpn\ fragment. The SmσL-Sσ/l l fragment of pPAP5 carries papE, papF and the 5' half of papG . Using this fragment as a probe in Southern blot¬ ting experiments, signals of equal strength were detected in all th ree plasmids analyzed . The fragments that hybridize hold equivalent posi¬ tions in the physical map of the three plasmids . On the other hand, a S /I I -SmσL probe carrying the 3' half of papG, while giving a strong signal with ρPAP5 DNA, did not hybridize to pDC5 or pPI LHO-35 DNA even at low stringency. It should be noted that these two plas¬ mids encode proteins that have a size similar to that of papG from this region . They also appear to have a similar restriction pattern , different from pPAP5, in the papG region . To more precisely define the borderline between homology and non-homology, a large number of M13 clones carrying defined regions of papE , papF and papG were used . Nick translated pDC5 and pPI LHO-35 were used as probes . Po¬ sitive hybridizations were detected with all M13 probes containing papE and papF DNA. None of the M13 clones carrying only papG DNA gave a positive signal . Thus, papE and papF are conserved, whereas there is a sharp decline in homology close to the end of papF and the start of papG . Protein expression in minicells Proteins expressed from pPAP5, pDC5 and pPI LHO-35 were [ S] - methionine labelled in E. coli minicells and the radiolabeiled gene pro¬ ducts were analyzed on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels . Proteins of similar molecular weight as papB and pσp>4 of pPAP5 were expressed from pPI LHO-35, but not from ρDC5. Both pDC5 and pPI L110-35 have been shown to express a protein, 71 -75K (Clegg, S . , and J . K. Pierce, "Organization of genes responsible for the production of mannose- resistant fimbriae of a uropathogeneic Escherichia coli isolate", Infect. Immun. 42, 1983, pp . 900-906, and van Die, I . et al. , "Molecular , organisation of the genes involved in the production of F7~fimbriae, causing mannose resistant haemagglutination, of a uropathogenic Escherichia coli 06: K2: HI : F7 strain, Moi. Gen . Genet. 194, 1984, pp. 528-533) , mapping approximately at the same position as papC of pPAP5. The papC gene products of pDC5 and pPI L110-35 appeared as weakly expressed proteins with a slightly lower molecular weight than the PapC protein of pPAP5, whereas both pDC5 and pPI LI l.0-35 ex- pressed a protein with the same molecular weight as the PapD pro¬ tein . For pPI L110-35 the gene encoding this protein has been mapped to the region corresponding to papD (van Die, I . et al . , "Molecular organisation of the genes involved in the production of F7-,fimbriae, causing mannose resistant haemagglutination , of a u ropathogenic Escherichia coli 06 : K2 : HI : F7 strain , Moi. Gen. Genet. 194, 1984, pp . 528-533) . The PapE protein of pPAP5 has an apparent molecular weight of 16.5K. It was not possible to detect a protein of the same size in pDC5 and pPI L110-35, however, the slightly smaller protein expressed from both plasmids could be the papE gene product of these gene clusters . All th ree plasmids expressed a 15K protein which is known to be encoded by papF that is essential for globoside binding . The PapG protein of pPAP5 is a 35K polypeptide, and in both pDC5 and pPI L110-35 proteins with a slightly h igher molecular weight were found . The S /l l -SσmH I cutback derivative of pDC5, pPAP502, did not express the 36K polypeptide. This localizes the gene for this protein to the same region as papG in ρPAP5. A highly expressed 17K polypeptide from ρDC5 and pPI L110-35 has been assigned to the distal Smσl -SσmH I fragment of these plasmids (Clegg, S . , and J . K. Pierce, "Organization of genes responsible for the production of mannoseresistant fimbriae of a u ropathogeneic Esche¬ richia coll isolate", Infect. Immun. 42, 1983, pp. 900-906, and van Die, I . et al . , "Molecular organisation of the genes involved in the production of F7«fimbriae, causing mannose resistant haemagglutination , of a uropathogenic Escherichia coil 06: K2: H1 : F7 strain , Moi. Gen . Genet. 194, 1984, pp. 528-533) . The pPAP5 constructs lack DNA equivalent to this region , consequently the 17K protein is not ex¬ pressed from these plasmids or from pPAP502. Complementation between the gene clusters on pPAP5 and pDC5 Since pDC5 contains DNA highly homologous to papC, papD, papE and papF , the question arose if pDC5 could be complemented by- pap A in pPAP5 to bring about the formation of a papA pilus . Consequently, pPAP43, which carries only the papB and papA genes and cannot surface localize the papA antigen, was constructed . Neither HB101 carrying this plasmid, nor the same strain with pDC5 was agglutinated by anti-pilus antiserum. When both these compatible plasmids were present in the same cell, however, the papA pilin was surface localized as demonstrated by antiserum agglutination . By electron microscopy it was confirmed that the papA pilin was assembled in the form of pili (data not shown) . Neither pPAP43 nor pDC5 alone expressed surface localized pili when harbored in H B101 . To see if the adhesin function also could be complemented between the gene clusters, pPAP502 lacking the DNA from the BglW site to the SσmH I site at the rightmost end of pDC5 was constructed . Compared to pDC5, this derivative failed to express a 36K and a 17K polypeptide in minicells . It is assumed that, in agreement with mapping and hybridization data, the 36K protein corresponds to the 35K protein encoded by papG of the pap gene cluster. Plasmid pPAP502, in con¬ trast to pDC5, did not mediate hemagglutination . Using pPAPlδ, a plasmid expressing papE , papF and papG in pPAP5, in trans it was possible to complement the deletion derivative ρPAP502 to hemaggluti¬ nation . Thus, also the adhesin function can be trαπs-complemented from one gene cluster to another, which is surprising, since the papG region is not well conserved between the clones . Plasmids pPAP18, pPAP17 and pPAP4 which are papEI , papFI and papGI mutants of pPAPlδ, (cf. General Materials and Methods above) , respectively, failed to complement the deletion on pPAP502. Plasmid pPAP503, containing the V/πα'I l I -SσmH I fragment of pDC5 under lac promoter control also failed to hemaggiutinate. However, pPAP503 could comple¬ ment the defect in pPAP502 as shown by the positive hemagglutination reaction obtained with cells containing both these plasmids . As ex¬ pected, a S≤r/l l -SσmH I deletion derivative of pPAP503 failed to accomp- lish this complementation (pPAP504 in Table 3) . These plasmids were used to complement mutations in the pap clone. It was shown that pPAP503 complemented all Tn5 insertion mutants in papF and papG, whereas the cutback derivative pPAP504 only complements those in papF (Table 3) . The pDC5 derivative pPAP507 encoding the papC, papD , papE and papF gene equivalents complemented pSNO21 carrying a Tn5 mutation in th papF gene. These results show that proteins functionally similar to the papF and papG gene products are encoded by the corresponding regions on pDC5. From the experiments in the present Example, it may be concluded that the papA gene and to some extent the papG gene exhibit variability over the th ree E. coli strains , whereas the papF gene exhibits very little variability . It is not possible to decide whether papG or papF encodes for the specific binding protein . TABLE 2 Characteristics of E. coli UTI strains and plasmid clones, encoding their respective adhesin Isolate Serotype of Designation of Serotype of Cloned spe- isolate plasmid clone cloned pilus cificity of antigen binding J96 04:K6:H5 pPAP5 F."CI34.3" Globoside IA2 06:H- pDC5 N.D. Globoside AD110 06:K2:H1 pPILHO-35 F7„ Globoside Globoside binding specificity was determined by positive slide hem¬ agglutination (HA) of P, -erythrocytes containing the globoside recep- tor and negative HA of p-erythrocytes which lack the globoside. Assay conditions were as described in General Materials and Methods above. N.D.: not determined. TABLE 3 Surface expression of globoside-specific adhesin by complementation between pap genes of pPAP5 and pDC5 Plasmid pSNO21 pSNO42 pPAP502 Mutation papF: : Tn5-021 papG : : Tn5-042 [papG] pPAPl δ wt pPAPlδ papEI pPAP17 papFI pPAP4 papGI PPAP503 Δ[pσpS-D] PPAP507 Δ[papG] pPAP504 Δ[pσpS-D] , [papG] Complementation of plasmid mutations harbou red in HB101 was moni¬ tored by slide hemagglutination of P, -erythrocytes as described in Materials and Methods and in General Materials and Methods above. The papEI and papFI mutations are non-polar mutations constructed by lin ker insertion mutagenesis (cf . General Materials and Methods above) . The papGI mutation is a deletion of the SmσL-SσmH I fragment, thereby truncating the papG protein by ~1 K, (cf . General Materials and Methods above) . The Tn5 mutations papF: : Tn5-021 and papG : : Tn5-042 have been mapped to the papF and papG genes, respectively. Plasmids pPAPl δ, pPAP18, pPAP17 and ρPAP4 are pPAP5 derivatives . Plasmids in the left column have a pBR322 (pMBl ) replicon whereas plasmid in the top column have a pACYC184 (p15A) replicon . Genes within brackets, [] , are pDC5 equivalents to the corresponding pap genes in pPAP5. EXAMPLE 9 Hybridization of clinical isolates of E. coli MATERIALS AND METHODS USED I N TH IS EXAMPLE Bacterial strains and plasmids The specimens consisted of 66 isolates of E. coli, collected from the urine of patients with significant bacteriu ria (>10 bacteria/ml) and 96 fecal E. coli isolates obtained from healthy individuals . Plasmid pPAP5 carries a x kb large EcoRI -SσmH I fragment from E. coli J96(0:4) that contains the entire pap gene cluster. The gene organisation is shown in Fig . 2. Plasmid pDC5 codes for the globoside specific adhesin of the uropathogenic E. coli strain IA2(0: 6) . Recently it was shown that these two plasmids shown extensive homology over the major part of the pap gene cluster. However, DNA of pPAP5 derived from the papG gene did not hybridize to pDC5. DNA sequencing has confirmed extensive differences between the papG genes in the two clones (Lund et al. , to be published) . Media and growth conditions The complete medium was Luria broth medium of Bertani supplemented with medium E and 0.2% glucose. The bacteria were grown at 37°C with shaking . Luria broth agar plates without glucose were used for agglutination assay. Receptor-binding assay For identification of digalactoside binding E. coli, bacterial cells grown for 22 hours on glucose-free Luria broth agar were resuspended in a solution of latex beads coated with the digalactoside receptor. The cells were considered to express the adhesin if they agglutinated the beads within one minute. Preparation of chromosomal DNA Q Each bacterial isolate was grown in 100 ml LB-medium to 4 x 10 cells/ml . The bacteria were collected by centrifugation , suspended in 40 ml PBS (100 mM K-phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCI) , recentrifugated and suspended in 5 ml PBS + 0. 1 mg/ml proteinase K, 5 mM EDTA and 0.5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulphate) . The suspensions were incubated overnight at room temperatu re and finally extracted with phenol and precipitated with ethanol , repeated twice. 32 Preparation of P- radiolabelled DNA fragments Plasmid pPAP5 and pDC5 were digested with the appropriate restric- 32 tion enzymes and DNA fragments were pu rified and P-labelled by nicked translation . Blotting and hybridization procedures A dot-blot procedure was followed . 2 μg of ch romosomal DNA was dis- solved in 170 μl 0. 1M Tris (pH 7.4) ! After the addition of 30 μl 2M NaOH and 100 μl 3M NaCI-0.3M sodium citrate, the mixtu re was incu¬ bated at 80°C for 20 minutes . The denatured DNA was chilled, neutra- 2 lized with 40 μl 2M Tris (pH 7) and sucked th rough a 7 mm area on a nitrocellulose filter, ai r dried and then baked in vacuo at 65°C for 12 hours . The filters were incubated for 2 hours in 10χ Denhardt (Denhardt = 0.02% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.02% Ficoll , 0.02% BSA) . They were once again incubated in a solution containing 4χ SSC, 0. 1% SDS, 2 mM EDTA, 10 χ Denhardt and 50 μg/ml calf thymus DNA (heated for 3 minutes at 95°C) and incubated for one hou r at 65°C . Finally they were incubated with a radiolabelled probe in the same solution as described above for 16 hou rs in 60°C and then washed in 4χ SSC 2χ 5 minutes and 2 χ SSC 2 χ 20 minutes at 60°C and then air-dried . The filters were exposed to Dupont Cronex 4 X-ray film together with an intensifying screen at -70°C and then developed . TABLE 4 Distribution of MR adhesins and hybridization to papE, papF and papG DNA Strain ADHES I NS DNA hyb. probe N r. 1 U ri¬ nary Human Swine Sheep Cow Galgal Pap E, F Pap G Pap G tract PI p J96 isolates J 96 + 3163u 001 + 12007 002 12014 003 12061 004 12081 005 12088 006 12118 007 12121 008 12144 009 12154 010 12159 011 12257 012 12268 013 12295 014 12297 015 12335 016 + 12340 017 + 12382 018 12383 019 + 12389 020 + Table 4 continued Strain ADHESI NS DNA hyb. probe Nr. 1 U ri¬ nary Human Swine Sheep Cow Galgal Pap E, F Pap G Pap G tract PI p J96 isolates 12390 021 12392 022 12409 023 12418 024 12444 025 12459 026 12483 027 12496 028 12497 029 12501 030 12516 031 12564 032 12568 033 12230 034 12571 035 12620 036 12627 037 12640 038 12654 039 12672 041 12708 042 12724 043 12725 044 12722 045 Table 4 continued Strain ADHES I NS DNA hyb. probe Nr. 1 Uri¬ nary Human Swine Sheep Cow Galgal Pap E, F Pap G Pap G tract PI P J96 isolates 12727 046 + •f + + •f + 12755 047 12756 048 + + + 12767 049 12782 050 + •f + + 12908 051 12933 052 12970 053 13047 054 + + + + 13058 055 + 13060 056 + 13122 057 + + 13131 058 + + + + 13147 059 13176 060 13177 061 13236 062 + + + + 13341 063 + + + 13347 064 13388 065 13389 066 + + •f > + 13781 067 Table 4 continued Strain ADHES I NS DNA hyb. probe Nr. 1 Fae¬ cal Human Swine Sheep Cow Galgal Pap E, F Pap G Pap G tract PI p J96 pDC5 isolates 2103 001F 2104 002F 2109 003F 2110 004F 2111 005F 2112 006F 2113 007F 2124 008F 2130 009F 2133 010F 2134 01 1 F 2138 012F 2139 013F 2140 014F 2145 015F 2146 016F + + - 2155 017F 2157 018F 2162 019F + 2171 020F 2172 021 F 2173 022F + + 2174 023F + + - + + Table 4 continued Strain ADHESI NS DNA hyb. probe N r. 1 Fae¬ cal Human Swine Sheep Cow Galgal Pap E, F Pap G Pap G tract PI p J96 pDC5 isolates 2177 024 F 2179 025F 2182 026 F 2186 027 F 2187 028 F 2188 029 F 2189 030 F 2190 031 F 2191 032F 2195 033 F 2196 034F 2197 035 F 2198 036 F 2200 037 F 2201 038F 2204 039 F 2205 040 F 2212 041 F 2213 042 F 2214 043 F 2216 044F 2218 045 F Table 4 continued Strain ADHES I NS DNA hyb . probe Nr. 1 Fae¬ cal Human Swine Sheep Cow Galgal Pap E,F Pap G Pap G tract PI p J96pDC5 isolates 2219 046F */- 2224 047F 2225 048F + + + 2226 049F 2227 050F V- 2229 051F 052F 053F 054F 2234 055F 056F 057F 2240 058F 059F 060F 061F 062F 063F 064F 065F 2249 066F 067F 068F Table 4 continued Strain ADHESI NS DNA hyb . probe Nr. 1 Fae¬ cal Human Swine Sheep Cow Galgal Pap E, F Pap G Pap G tract PI p J96 pDC5 isolates 069 F 070 F 071 F 072 F 073 F 074 F 075 F 076F 2265 077 F */- 078 F 079 F 080 F 081 F 082 F 083 F 084F 085 F 086 F 087 F 22286 088 F V- 089 F 090F Table 4 continued Strain ADHESINS DNA hyb. probe Nr. 1 Fae¬ cal Human Swine Sheep Cow Galgal Pap E,F Pap G Pap G tract PI p J96 pDC5 isolates 091 F 22290 092 F + - 093 F 094 F 095 F 096 F Hybridization hemagglutination results on E. coli isolates used in this study I SOLATES U rine Feca P-spec MRHA 17 4 p-spec MRHA 7 3 Z-spec MRHA 10 3 Total MRHA 34 10 Non MRHA 32 86 Urine strains Faecal strains (66 st) (96 st) Hybridization results Pap E, F Pap G ' Pap E, F Pap G pPAP5 pDC5 pPAP5 pDC5 pos neg pos neg pos neg pos neg P-spec MRHA 16 1 16 1 4 0 3 1 p-spec MRHA 3 4 4 3 3 0 2 1 Z-spec MRHA 8 2 7 3 1 2 1 2 Total MRHA 27 7 27 7 8 2 6 4 Non MRHA 0 32 3 29 2 84 9 77 Total number of strains 27 39 30 36 10 86 15 81 Latex beads positive 26 0 24 2 5 Latex beads negative 1 39 6 34 5 Total number of strains 27 39 30 36 10 P-spec MRHA: including strains that also agglutinate animal erythro¬ cytes . p-spec MRHA: erythrocytes that agglutinate human p-blood . Z-spec MRHA: no hemagglutination to human erythrocyes but to any of the following animal erythrocytes : Swine, sheep, cow. The results obtained in this Example demonstrate that a large number of the clinical isolates of E. coli strains that bind to digalactoside have the E, F and G regions in thei r pap operons, and that strains that do not bind digalactoside do not have the E, F and G regions of the pap operon although they have the other regions in the operon .

Claims: CLAIMS 1 . An antigen which , as its major immunizing component, comprises a determinant of an adhesin polypeptide or an immunogenically active subsequence thereof or a precu rsor therefor which is convertible to an immunologically active form, antibodies against which determinant react with the adhesin polypeptide produced by pathogenic adhesin- forming bacteria which adhere to mammalian tissue. 2. An antigen according to claim 1 which comprises an amino acid sequence of at least 5 amino acids and up to the entire amino acid sequence of the adhesin polypeptide. 3. An antigen according to claim 1 or 2 which binds to carbohydrate or protein receptors on mammalian tissue cells, or mammalian erythro¬ cytes . 4. An antigen according to claim 3 which binds to a carbohydrate receptor. 5. An antigen according to claim 4 which binds to a digalactoside- containing glycolipid or glycoprotein . 6. An antigen according to any of claims 1 -5 which is derived from an adhesin-forming bacterium. 7. An antigen according to claim 6 in which the bacterium is a u ro¬ pathogenic or enteropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli or other enteric bacteria or oral bacteria, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrhalis, Yersinia spp . , Pseudomonas aeru- ginosa or other Pseudomonas spp . , Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp . , Baderoides nodosus, Staphylococcus spp . , Streptococcus spp. or Bordetella spp. such as Bordetella pertussis. 8. An antigen according to any of claims 1 -7 in which the adhesin polypeptide is a pilus adhesin polypeptide. 9. An antigen according to claim 8 in which the pilus adhesin poly¬ peptide is a minor pilus component. 10. An antigen according to claim 9 which is derived from a pathogenic pilus-forming bacterium. 11. An antigen according to claim 10 in which the bacterium is a uropathogenic or enteropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrhalis, Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp., or Bordetella pertussis. 12. An antigen according to claim 11 in which the pathogenic strain of E. coli is a uropathogenic strain. 13. An antigen according to any of claims 1-12 which has the following amino acid sequence: Met-Lys-Lys-Ile-Arg-GIy-Leu-Cys-Leu-Pro-Val-Met-Leu-GIy-Ala-Val- Leu-Met-Ser-Gln-His-Val-His-Ala-Val-Asp-Asn-Leu-Thr-Phe-Arg-Gly- Lys-Leu-lle-lle-Pro-Ala-Cys-Thr-Val-Ser-Asn-Thr-Thr-Val-Asp-Trp- Gln-Asp-Val-Glu-lle-Gln-Thr-Leu-Ser-Gln-Asn-GIy-Asn-His-Glu-Lys- Glu-Phe-Thr-Val-Asn-Met-Arg-Cys-Pro-Tyr-Asn-Leu-Gly-Thr-Met- Lys-Val-Thr-lle-Thr-Ala-Thr-Asn-Thr-Tyr-Asn-Asn-Ala-lle-Leu-Val- Gln-Asn-Thr-Ser-Asn-Thr-Ser-Ser-Asp-Gly-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-Leu- Tyr-Asn-Ser-Asn-Ala-Gly-Asn-lle-Gly-Thr-Ala-lle-Thr-Leu-Gly-Thr- Pro-Phe-Thr-Pro-Gly-Lys-lle-Thr-Gly-Asn-Asn-Ala-Asp-Lys-Thr-lle- Ser-Leu-His-Ala-Lys-Leu-Gly-Tyr-Lys-Gly-Asn-Met-Gln-Asn-Leu-lle- Ala-Gly-Pro-Phe-Ser-Ala-Thr-Ala-Thr-Leu-Val-Ala-Ser-Tyr-Ser or any immunogenically active subsequence thereof. 14. An antigen according to any of claims 1-12 which has the following amino acid sequence: Met-lle-Arg-Leu-Ser-Leu-Phe-lle-Ser-Leu-Leu-Leu-Thr-Ser-Val-Ala- Val-Leu-Ala-Asp-Val-Gln-lle-Asn-lle-Arg-Gly-Asn-Val-Tyr-lle-Pro- Pro-Cys-Thr-lle-Asn-Asn-Gly-Gln-Asn-lle-Val-Val-Asp-Phe-Gly-Asn- lle-Asn-Pro-Glu-His-Val-Asp-Asn-Ser-Arg-Gly-Glu-Val-Thr-Lys-Thr- lle-Ser-Ile-Ser-Cys-Pro-Tyr-Lys-Ser-Gly-Ser-Leu-Trp-lle-Lys-Val- Thr-Gly-Asn-Thr-Met-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gln-Asn-Asn-Val-Leu-Ala-Thr- Asn-IIe-Thr-His-Phe-GIy-lle-AIa-Leu-Tyr-Gln-Gly-Lys-Gly-Met-Ser- Thr-Pro-Leu-lle-Leu-Gly-Asn-GIy-Ser-Gly-Asn-GIy-Tyr-Gly-Val-Thr- Ala-GIy-Leu-Asp-Thr-Ala-Arg-Ser-Thr-Phe-Thr-Phe-Thr-Ser-Val- Pro-Phe-Arg-Asn-Gly-Ser-Giy-lle-Leu-Asn-Gly-Gly-Asp-Phe-GIn- Thr-Thr-Ala-Ser-Met-Ser-Met-lle-Tyr-Asn or any immunogenically active subsequence thereof. 15. An antigen according to any of claims 1-12 which has the following amino acid sequence: Met-Lys-Lys-Trp-Phe-Pro-Ala-Phe-Leu-Phe-Leu-Ser-Leu-Ser-Gly- Gly-Asn-Asp-Ala-Leu-AIa-Gly-Trp-His-Asn-Val-Met-Phe-Tyr-Ala- Phe-Asn-Asp-Tyr-Leu-Thr-Thr-Asn-Ala-Gly-Asn-Val-Lys-Val-IIe- Asp-Gln-Pro-Gln-Leu-Tyr-lle-Pro-Trp-Asn-Thr-Gly-Ser-Ala-Thr-AIa- Thr-Tyr-Tyr-Ser-Cys-Ser-Gly-Pro-Glu-Phe-AIa-Ser-GIy-Val-Tyr- Phe-Gln-Glu-Tyr-Leu-Ala-Trp-Met-Val-Val-Pro-Lys-His-Val-Tyr-Thr- Asn-Glu-Gly-Phe-Asn-lle-Phe-Leu-Asp-Val-Gln-Ser-Lys-Tyr-Gly- Trp-Ser-Met-Glu-Asn-GIu-Asn-Asp-Lys-Asp-Phe-Tyr-Phe-Phe-Val- Asn-Gly-Tyr-Glu-Trp-Asp-Thr-Trp-Thr-Asn-Asn-Gly-Ala-Arg-lle- Cys-Phe-Tyr-Pro-Gly-Asn-Met-Lys-GIn-Leu-Asn-Asn-Lys-Phe-Asn- Asp-Leu-Val-Phe-Arg-Val-Leu-Leu-Pro-Val-Asp-Leu-Pro-Lys-Gly- His-Tyr-Asn-Phe-Pro-Val-Arg-Tyr-lle-Arg-Gly-IIe-Gln-His-His-Tyr- Ty r- Asp- Leu-Trp-G In- Asp-His-Tyr-Ly s-Met-Pro-Tyr- Asp-Gin- 1 le- Lys-Gln-Leu-Pro-Ala-Thr-Asn-Thr-Leu-Met-Leu-Ser-Phe-Asp-Asn- Val-Gly-Gly-Cys-Gln-Pro-Ser-Thr-Gln-Val-Leu-Asn-Ile-Asp-His-GIy- Ser-Ile-Val-IIe-Asp-Arg-Ala-Asn-Gly-Asn-lle-Ala-Ser-Gln-Thr-Leu- Ser-IIe-Tyr-Cys-Asp-Val-Pro-Val-Ser-Val-Lys-Ile-Ser-Leu-Leu-Arg- Asn-Thr-Pro-Pro-lle-Tyr-Asn-Asn-Asn-Lys-Phe-Ser-Val-Gly-Leu- Gly-Asn-Gly-Trp-Asp-Ser-lle-lle-Ser-Leu-Asp-Gly-Val-Glu-Gln-Ser- Glu-Glu-Ile-Leu-Arg-Trp-Tyr-Thr-Ala-Gly-Ser-Lys-Thr-Val-Lys-lle- Glu-Ser-Arg-Leu-Tyr-Gly-Glu-GIu-Gly-Lys-Arg-Lys-Pro-Gly-Glu- Leu-Ser-GIy-Ser-Met-Thr-Met-Val-Leu-Ser-Phe-Pro or any immunogenically active subsequence thereof. 16. An antigen according to any of claims 8-15 which is substantially free from other components of the pilus . 17. An antigen according to any of claims 1 -16 which is in substan¬ tially pure form . 18. An antibody raised against, or di rected substantially only against, an antigen as defined in any of claims 1 -17. 19. An antibody according to claim 18 which is obtained by immunizing an immunizable animal with an antigen as defined in any of claims 1 -17. 20. An antibody according to claim 18 or 19 which is in substantially pu re form. 21 . A method of preparing an antibody according to claim 18 or 19 in which an immunizable animal is immunized with an antigen as defined in any of claims 1.-17, and antiserum from the animal is obtained . 22. A method according to claim 21 in which the immunization is performed with a stabilized aqueous solution of an antigen as defined in any of claims 1 -17. 23. A method according to claim 22 in which the stabi lizing agent is a buffer or an adjuvant. 24. A method according to claim 23 in which the adjuvant is Freund's adjuvant or aluminium hydroxide. 25. A method of preparing an antibody according to claim 18 in which a hybridoma cell clone producing an antibody di rected against an antigen as defined in any of claims 1 -17 is grown in a suitable growth medium, and the antibodies formed are recovered from the culture. 26. A method according to claim 25 in which the gene or genes en¬ coding the antibody are transferred from the hybridoma cell clone to a suitable vector, the hybrid vector is transformed to a suitable bacterial host, the host is grown in an appropriate medium, and the antibody is recovered from the culture. 27. A method according to claim 26 in which the bacterial host is Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis. 28. A vaccine for immunizing a mammalian subject against diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria which adhere to mammalian tissue, which contains an immunogenically effective amount of an antigen according to any of claims 1 -17, optionally bound to a suitable car- rier, together with an immunologically acceptable vehicle. 29. A vaccine according to claim 28 in which the carrier is a physio¬ logically acceptable polymer. 30. A method of preparing a vaccine according to claim 28 or 29 in which an immunogenically effective amount of an antigen as defined in any of claims 1 -17, optionally bound to a suitable carrier, is combined with an immunologically acceptable vehicle. 31 . A method according to claim 30 in which the antigen comprises an amino acid sequence of at least 5 amino acids, and the carrier is a physiologically acceptable polymer to which the amino acid sequence has been covalently bound . 32. A method according to claim 30 in which the nucleotide sequence encoding an antigen as defined in any of claims 1 -17 is fused to the nucleotide sequence encoding a physiologically acceptable carrier polypeptide, the fused DNA sequence is inserted into a suitable vec- tor, the hybrid vector is transformed to a suitable bacterial host, the host is grown in an appropriate medium, and the fused polypeptide is recovered from the culture. 33. A DNA fragment which comprises at least the nucleotide sequence encoding an antigen as defined in claim 1 , the DNA fragment prefera- bly being one which encodes no other antigen . 34. A DNA fragment according to claim 33 which comprises the nu¬ cleotide sequence encoding the enti re adhesin polypeptide. 35. A DNA fragment according to claim 33 which comprises the nucleo¬ tide sequence encoding a precu rsor of an adhesin polypeptide which is convertible to an immunogenically active form. 36. A DNA fragment according to claim 33 which comprises the nu¬ cleotide sequence encoding an immunogenically active subsequence of an adhesin polypeptide. 37. A DNA fragment according to any of claims 33-36 which has a length of at least 5 codons . 38. A DNA fragment according to any of claims 33-37 which is derived from an adhesin-forming bacterium . 39. A DNA fragment according to claim 38 which is derived from a uropathogenic or enteropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli or other enteric bacteria or oral bacteria, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrhalis, Yersinia spp. , Pseudomonas aeru- ginosa or other Pseudomonas spp . , Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp . , Bacteroides nodosus, Staphylococcus spp. , Streptococcus spp . , or Bordetella spp. such as Bordetella pertussis . 40. A DNA fragment according to any of claims 33-37 in which the adhesin polypeptide is a pilus adhesin polypeptide. 41 . A DNA fragment according to claim 40 in which the pilus adhesin polypeptide is a minor pilus component. 42. A DNA fragment according to any of claim 33-41 which is derived from pathogenic pilus-forming bacteria. 43. A DNA fragment according to claim 42 in which the bacterium is a uropathogenic or enteropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrhalis, Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp.,, or Bordetella pertussis. 44. A DNA fragment according to claim 43 in which the pathogenic strain of E.cofi is a u ropathogenic strain . 45. A DNA fragment according to claim 44 which has the following DNA sequence: ATGAAAAAGATAAGAGGTTTGTGTCTTCCGGTAATGCTGGGGGCAGTGT- TAATGTCTCAGCATGTACATGCAGTTGATAATCTGACCTTCAGAGGAAA- ACTGATTATTCCTGCCTGTACTGTAAGCAACACAACTGTTGACTGGCAG- GATGTAGAGATTCAGACCCTGAGTCAAAATGGAAATCACGAAAAAGAGT- TTACTGTGAATATGCGGTGTCCCTATAATCTGGGAACAATGAAGGTTAC- GATAACGGCAACAAACACTTATAACAATGCTATTTTAGTTCAGAATACA- TCAAACACATCTTCTGATGGGTTACTCGTTTATCTTTATAACAGTAATG- CAGGAAATATTGGGACTGCGATAACTTTAGGGACTCCATTTACGCCCGG- AAAAATCACAGGTAATAATGCAGATAAAACTATATCACTTCATGCCAAA- CTTGGATATAAAGGGAATATGCAGAATTTGATAGCCGGTCCTTTCTCT- GCAACAGCAACGCTGGTTGCATCATATTCGTAA or any subsequence thereof which , when expressed, constitutes an immunogenically active subsequence of the adhesin polypeptide en¬ coded by the entire DNA sequence. 46. A DNA fragment according to claim 44 which has the following DNA sequence: ATGATTCGTTTATCATTATTTATATCGTTGCTTCTGACATCGGTCGCT- GTACTGGCTGATGTGCAGATTAACATCAGGGGGAATGTTTATATCCCC- CCATGCACCATTAATAACGGGCAGAATATTGTTGTTGATTTTGGGAAT- ATTAATCCTGAGCACGTGGACAACTCACGTGGTGAAGTCACAAAAACC- ATAAGCATATCCTGTCCGTATAAGAGTGGCTCTCTCTGGATAAAAGTT- ACGGGAAATACTATGGGAGGAGGTCAGAATAATGTACTGGCAACAAAT- ATAACTCATTTTGGTATAGCGCTGTATCAGGGAAAAGGAATGTCAACAC- CTCTTATATTAGGTAATGGTTCAGGAAATGGTTACGGAGTGACAGCAG- GTCTGGACACAGCACGTTCAACGTTCACCTTTACTTCAGTGCCCTTTC- GTAATGGCAGCGGGATACTGAATGGCGGGGATTTCCAGACCACGGCCAG- TATGAGCATGATTTATAACTGA or any subsequence thereof which , when expressed, constitutes an immunogenically active subsequence of the adhesin polypeptide en¬ coded by the entire DNA sequenc .. 47. A DNA fragment according to claim 44 which has the following DNA sequence: ATGAAAAAATGGTTCCCTGCTTTTTTATTTTTATCCCTGTCAGGCGGT- AATGATGCTTTAGCTGGATGGCACAATGTCATGTTTTATGCTTTTAAC- GACTATTTAACTACAAATGCTGGTAATGTTAAGGTTATTGACCAACCT- CAGCTATATATACCCTGGAATACAGGCTCTGCTACAGCAACTTATTAT- TCGTGCTCAGGTCCGGAATTTGCGAGTGGAGTGTATTTTCAGGAGTAT- CTGGCCTGGATGGTTGTTCCTAAACATGTCTATACTAATGAGGGGTTT- AATATATTTCTTGATGTTCAGAGCAAATATGGTTGGTCTATGGAGAAT- GAAAATGACAAAGATTTTTACTTCTTTGTTAATGGTTATGAATGGGAT- ACATGGACAAATAATGGTGCCCGTATATGTTTCTATCCTGGAAATATG- AAGCAGTTGAACAATAAATTTAATGATTTAGTATTCAGGGTTCTTTTG- CCAGTAGATCTCCCCAAGGGACATTATAATTTTCCTGTGAGATATATA- CGTGGAATACAGCACCATTACTATGATCTCTGGCAGGATCATTATAAA- ATGCCTTACGATCAGATTAAGCAGCTACCTGCCACTAATACATTGATG- TTATCATTCGATAATGTTGGGGGATGCCAGCCGTCAACACAAGTACTT- AATATAGACCATGGGAGTATTGTGATTGATCGTGCTAACGGAAATATT- AGCAAGTCAGACGCTTTCAATTTATTGCGATGTACCAGTTAGTGTAAA- ATATCTCTGCTCAGAAATACACCACCAATATACAATAATAATAAATTT- TCGGTTGGGTTAGGTAATGGCTGGGATTCGATAATATCTCTTGATGGG- GTTGAACAGAGTGAGGAAATATTACGCTGGTACACAGCCGGCTCAAAA- ACAGTAAAGATTGAGAGCAGGTTGTATGGTGAAGAGGGAAAGAGAAAA- CCCGGGGAGCTATCTGGTTCTATGACTATGGTTCTGAGTTTCCCCTGA or any subsequence thereof which, when expressed, constitutes an immunogenically active subsequence of the adhesin polypeptide en¬ coded by the entire DNA sequence. 48. A method of preparing an antigen comprising, as its major immu¬ nizing component, a determinant of an adhesin polypeptide, in which a bacterial host harbouring a hybrid vector containing an inserted DNA fragment which comprises at least the nucleotide sequence enco- ding an antigen as defined in claim 1 , the DNA fragment encoding substantially no other antigen , is cultivated, and the product ex¬ pressed from the DNA fragment is recovered, optionally followed by purification . 49. A method according to claim 48 in which a DNA fragment encoding a first polypeptide comprising the adhesin polypeptide or an immuno¬ genically active subsequence thereof or a precursor therefor which is convertible to an immunologically active form is fused to a DNA se¬ quence encoding a second polypeptide, the fused DNA sequence is inserted into a suitable bacterial host, the host is grown in an ap¬ propriate medium, the fused polypeptide is recovered from the culture and purified using an assay involving antibodies raised against the second polypeptide, and the second polypeptide is optionally cleaved off by means of a suitable protease followed by separation of the two polypeptides . 50. A method according to claim 49 in which the DNA sequence en¬ coding the second polypeptide is the lacZ gene encoding β-galactosi- dase. 51 . A method according to any of claims 48-50 in which the DNA fragment is the DNA fragment according to any of claims 33-47. 52. A method of preparing an antigen comprising, as its major immu¬ nizing component, a determinant of an adhesin polypeptide, in which the polypeptide or an immunogenically active subsequence thereof is prepared by peptide synthesis . 53. A method according to claim 52 in which the adhesin polypeptide is a pilus adhesin polypeptide. 54. A method according to claim 52 or 53 in which the polypeptide synthesized has a length of at least 5 amino acids . 55. A method according to any of claims 52-54 in which the polypep- tide is prepared by solid phase peptide synthesis . 56. A method according to claim 55 in which the carrier to which the initial amino acid is coupled du ring synthesis is a physiologically acceptable polymer useful as a carrier for the antigen in the vaccine according to claim 28 or 29. 57. A composition for the passive immunization of a mammalian subject against diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria which adhere to mam¬ malian tissue, which comprises an immunologically effective amount of an antibody according to any of claims 18-20, optionally bound to a suitable carrier, together with an immunologically acceptable vehicle. 58. A composition according to claim 57 in which the carrier is a phy¬ siologically acceptable polymer. 59. A method of preparing a composition according to claim 57 or 58 in which an immunologically effective amount of an antibody according to any of claims 18-20, optionally bou nd to a suitable carrier, is combined with an immunologically acceptable vehicle. 60. A diagnostic agent which comprises an antibody according to any of claims 18-20. 61 . A diagnostic agent according to claim 60 in which the antibody is an antibody raised against an immunogenic determinant of a pilus adhesin polypeptide. 62. A diagnostic agent which comprises an antibody raised against an immunological determinant other than the antigen defined in any of claims 1 -17. 63. A diagnostic agent according to claim 62 which comprises an anti- body raised against another polypeptide encoded by an adhesin gene cluster. 64. A diagnostic agent according to claim 63 in which the the anti¬ body is an antibody raised against another pilus polypeptide. 65. A diagnostic agent wh ich comprises a stable, labelled DNA se¬ quence which is at least about 60% homologous with a DNA sequence in the bacterium to be detected . 66. A diagnostic agent according to claim 65 in which the DNA se- quence has a length of at least 12 nucleotides . 67. A diagnostic agent according to claim 65 or 66 which is label led with a radioactive labelling agent. 68. A diagnostic agent according to any of claims 65-67 in which the DNA sequence comp rises a gene which is part of an adhesin gene cluster, but wh ich does not encode the adhesin polypeptide itself , or a diagnostically effective subsequence therof . 69. A diagnostic agent according to claim 68 in which the DNA se¬ quence comprises a gene coding for a pilus polypeptide produced by a pathogenic pilus-forming bacterium which is not a pilus adhesin poly- peptide, or a diagnostically effective subsequence thereof . 70. A diagnostic agent according to claim 69 in wh ich the DNA se¬ quence encoding the pil us polypeptide or a subsequence thereof is derived from a u ropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli. 71 . A diagnostic agent accordi ng to claim 70 in wh ich the DNA se- quence comprises the gene papC as defined in the specification or a diagnostically effective subsequence thereof . 72. A diagnostic agent according to claim 70 in which the DNA se¬ quence comprises the gene papD as defined in the specification or a diagnostically effective subsequence thereof . 73. A diagnostic agent according to claim 70 in which the DNA se¬ quence comprises the gene papB as defined in the specification or a diagnostically effective subsequence thereof . 74. A method of immunizing a mammal against diseases caused by pathogenic adhesin-forming bacteria which adhere to mammalian tissue, which comprises administering a vaccine containing an immunogenically effective amount of an antigen according to any of claims 1 -17, op- tionally bound to a suitable carrier, or a composition for passive immunization containing an antibody according to any of claims 18-20, optionally bound to a suitable carrier, together with an immunologic¬ ally acceptable vehicle. 75. A method according to claim 74 in which the bacteria are u ropa- thogenic or enteropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli or other enteric bacteria or oral bacteria, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrhalis, Yersinia spp. , Pseudomonas aeru- giπosa or other Pseudomonas spp . , Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp . , Bacteroides nodosus, Staphylococcus spp. , Streptococcus spp . , or Bordetella spp . such as Bordetella pertussis . 76. A method according to claim 75 in which the pathogenic bacteria are pilus-forming bacteria . 77. A method according to claim 76 in which the pathogenic bacteria are u ropathogenic or enteropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningiditis, Neisseria catarrhalis, Moraxella bovis or other Moraxella spp . , or Bordetella pertussis. 78. A method of determining receptor density or distribution in a host mammal such as a human , comprising treating a tissue sample from the host with a receptor-specific polypeptide, removing unbound recep- tor-specific polypeptide and determining the amount of receptor-specific polypeptide bound . 79. A method according to claim 78 wherein the receptor-specific polypeptide is an adhesin polypeptide. 80. A method according to claim 79 wherein the adhesin polypeptide is an adhesin polypeptide of a uropathogenic strain of E. coli. 81 . A method for preventing or reducing the possibility of infection of a human being or other mammal with a pathogenic adhesin-binding microorganism, comprising treating the human being or other mammal with one or more adhesin polypeptides so as to distribute the poly¬ peptides over the cell su rfaces for which infection with a specific pathogenic bacteria is to be prevented, the adhesin polypeptide used being an adhesin polypeptide that will bind with the receptors with which the adhesin generated by the pathogenic bacteria will bind .

Inventors: BAOGA BRITT MONIKA, GOERANSSON MIKAEL, LARK DAVID LEE, LINDBERG FREDERIK CARL PETER, LUND BJOERN OLOF, NORGREN MARI ELISABET, NORMARK JAN STAFFAN, UHLIN BERNT ERIC ANUND, BAOGA, BRITT, MONIKA, GOERANSSON, MIKAEL, LARK, DAVID, LEE, LINDBERG, FREDERIK, CARL, PETER, LUND, BJOERN, OLOF, NORGREN, MARI, ELISABET, NORMARK, JAN, STAFFAN, UHLIN, BERNT, ERIC, ANUND
Applicants: SYN TEK AB, SYN-TEK
Application year: 1985
Main classification: A61K39
IPC codes: A61K39, A61P31, C07H21, C07K14, C07K16, C12N5, C12N15, C12P21, C12R1, G01N33