PULSE SYNCHRONIZING APPARATUS

Abstract: A synchronizing apparatus for synchronizing a first and second pulse train, having the same pseudo random coding comprises a programmable delay (24) responsive to a control signal (50) for selectively advancing and retarding a pulse train by monotonic increments.

Description: Pulse Synchronizing Apparatus This invention relates to radar distance measuring equipment, and particularly to apparatuses for synchronizing two pulse trains derived from a single clock signal. Pulsed radar systems have conventionally operated with a relatively low transmitter duty cycle determned by the maximum range to the target. As a result, the peak power required for the transmitter in order to obtain sufficient signal-to-noise ratio is high. The duty cycle can be increased by increasing the pulse repetition frequency. This results in having several pulses in flight at the same time. In these circumstances, an apparatus must be provided for overcoming the ambiguous range problem due to multiple pulses in flight. For noncoherent radars, this commonly takes the form of random pulse position frequency jitter, which is effective for relatively small duty cycle improvement but degrades rapidly with increase in duty cycle. Increasing pulse repetition frequency and overcoming ambiguity may be accomplished by encoding an RF pulse train which in turn will permit increasing the altimeter pulse repetition frequency by at least a factor of ten. This in turn will yield a corresponding increase in system loop sensitivity. Previous pulsed altimeter concepts require that the system wait for the ground echo from a given transmitted pulse to be received back at the receiver before transmitting another pulse. Doing so prevented the possibility of false "lock-on". Suitable encoding of a transmitted pulse sequence, and the corresponding receiver correlation of that code sequence, will permit many pulses to be in route to the ground and back at the same time. This increases the potential total average RF energy on the target, and improves sensitivity (particularly at high altitudes, where the "wait time would previously have been relatively long). The transmitter pulse separation in these circumstances is now limited only by "pulse spreading on the ground within the antenna beamwidth, and the codes ambiguous range rejection capabilities. Heretofor, unresolved coding problem was not in generating the code but in the establishing of a simple method of variably delaying a complete code word in time (as opposed to a single pulse), relative to its origin, with virtually infinite resolution and over a wide range of delay times. In order to achieve this object the pulse synchronizing apparatus according to the invention utilizes a programmable delay means for generating a pulse train derived from a high frequency clock. The programmable delay means is responsive to a command signal for monotonically advancing or retarding the pulse train relative to the high frequency clock in accordance with the command signal. Preferred embodiments and details are described in the subclaims. When employed in a radar altimeter, a received pulse train, sometimes referred to as the video signal, is compared with a pulse train having substantially the same characteristic in code as the video signal but which is forceably delayed in time so as to be synchronized with the video signal. An output indicative of the comparator may be integrated so as to provide control of the programmable delay line to appropriately advance or retard the signal. When synchronization occurs, a stop pulse is provided to a timer such that the timer output is indicative of the range from the radar to the target. A preferred embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to the drawings, in which FIGURE 1 is a block diagram of a pulse radar altimeter employing the principles of the invention; FIGURE 2 is a schematic diagram showing certain relationships between returned video pulses and local gating pulses in predetermined conditions; FIGURE 3 is a graphical representation showing certain relationships between individual video signals and gating pulses. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EIBDDXMENT The synchronization apparatus of the present invention will be described as utilized in a radar altimeter to facilitate understanding. In the block diagram of FIGURE 1, a clock 10 supplies a continuous train of equally spaced pulses at a fixed pulse repetition frequency thereby establishing a first clock signal Cl. In turn the first clock signal Cl is fed through a divider 11 which divides the first clock signal by an integer aN" thereby providing a first pulse train. A code generator 12 operates on the first pulse train to derive therefrom a second pulse train having a repetitive pulse code which in turn triggers a pulse generator 13. The output of pulse generator 13 is a sequence of sharp pulses, defined by the second pulse code of the second pulse train, applied to transmitter 15 for subsequent radar transmission through antenna 17. Each repetition of the pulse code defines a word in a well known manner. In the radar altimeter illustrated in Figure 1, the output of transmitting antenna 17 is a repetitive radar pulse code which may be, by way of example, coherent or non-coherent radar pulses, and the like. The repeating pulse code is radiated from the transmitting antenna 17 and reflected from the ground, or other target, to a receiving antenna 20 and a receiver 21 which energizes a video amplifier 22 to provide a train of reflected pulses delayed in time relative to the output of pulse generator 13 by an interval which is a measure of the distance to the reflecting target. Antenna 17 and 20 may be a single antenna which is fed from a duplexer well known in the art. The output pulses from the video amplifier 22 will be subsequently integrated by integrater 30 through adder 29 and gating circuit 27, both of which will subsequently be described. The output of the integrater 30 is presented to comparator 31 having an output which is presented as a command signal 50 to up/down counter 34. The output of comparator 31 is also presented to a search-and-track logic 33 which has an output presented to a track/non-track indicator 35. As illustrated in Figure 1. first clock signal C1 is presented to a second divider 23 through a programmable delay line 24. The output of a programmable delay means 24 shown as a programmable delay line, is a second clock signal C2 which is substantially identical to first clock signal C1 but which is delayed with respect to the first clock signal. In turn the second clock signal C2 is passed through a second divider 23 which divides the second clock signal by the same factor "N" thereby providing a third pulse train. The third pulse train is passed through a second code generator 25 substantially identical to code generator 12 for providing a fourth pulse train having a repetitive code identical to the second pulse train at the output of code generator 12 but which is delayed in time. Programmable delay line 24, as illustrated in Figure 1, produces a delay in accordance with a command signal 76 provided by the digital output lines of up/down/hold counter 34, hereafter counter 34. Counter 34 counts clock signals 75, dependent upon a decision control signal 50 as will be subsequently described. The total delay provided between the second clock signal and the first clock signal should be beteeen some fixed value, including zero, and a total change exactly the same length as clock signal passing through it--that is a sum of an integral number of successive or monotonic increments of delay should be equal to the period of clock signal C1. Counter 34 is usually clocked by clock signal 75 at a very much slower rate than a signal passing through the delay line, so that the delay through the delay means will only monotonically change one increment for each clock signal presented at input 75. The combination of programmable delay line 24 and counter 34 is such that when the maximum delay of the delay line is reached after successive step changes provided by counter 34, the delay automatically is switched to the other end of the delay line and the sequence continues over again in exactly the same fashion as the "roll-over" in an up/down counter when it overflows or underflows. The result is that for a continuous shift of the delay line in one direction, a complete cycle of incoming clock from clock 10 is skipped or added every time the phase delay line control counter "rolls-over". In Figure 1, divider 11 may be a simple digital divider and includes output taps for having other division factors. Therefore clock signal 75 may be picked up off a tap of divider 11 as illustrated. Doing so synchronizes clock 75 with clock signal C1, although this may not be necessary. The small increment phase shifting technique just described, functions similarly to that of a single-side band, suppress carrier modulator. The net result is that the average output frequency from the phase shifter is different from that of the master clock by the rate at which the shifter is driven through 360 degree clock shifts. This is the unique frequency controlling mechanism that effectively increases or decreases the average third pulse train frequency (in very small increments) presented to code generator 25 and in turn to gate generator 26 as will be further described. Consider a situation where the first clock signal provided by clock 10 is chosen to have a period equal to the propagation time of 16 radar feet (approximately 31 MHz). This choice allows the phase shifting mechanism for the gate clock to be a 4-bit, digitally controlled device for one-foot shift increments. Other specific combinations of clock frequency and shift increments may be more convenient for some applications. A programmable delay line rather than a discreet component phase shifter or shift register is economically desireable. In Figure 1 the command signal 76 to the programmable delay line is driven by a 4-bit up/down counter 34 that is clocked at a rate equal to the maximum search or track rate requirement of the altimeter. This is determined by clock signal 75. This follows because we chose one-foot increments for each shift. Other compatible combinations can be used depending upon requirements. For example, a 2000-cycle-per-second clock rate 75 will yield a 2000-foot-per-second gate shift rate capability. The 'up/down/hold" decision signal 50 to the up/down/hold counter 34 axes from a high speed comparator 31 that compares the conventional gated and integrated range error* signal from integrator 30 with that of a fixed reference voltage to close the track loop, as in conventional altimeters. The normal AGC and search-track functions are also mechanised as they are in conventional altimeters. If the up/down counter is expanded to 16 bits, using the first 4 bits to drive the programmable delay line 24, a 16-bit digital altitude can be extracted directly from this counter for specific applications. Nevertheless, for ease and adjustment for "zero-foot" installation delays as required in most aircraft, average digital altitude output information is derived from a conventional time-to-digital converter 40 that gets its start pulse from code word generator 12 and its "stop" pulses from code word generator 25 indicated by outputs 44 and 46 respectively. The output of digital converter 40 is therefore indicative of the altitude. Of course, this is only the situation when the system is in a "track" condition. Gate generator 26 is diagramatically shown as a pair of AND gates 26a and 26b each having as a first input a short gateor SYNC pulse provided by divider chain 23. AND gate 26a has as a second input, the output of code generator 25. Therefore gate 26a provides pulses 42 only when the coded pulse train provides a logical 'one" or positive signals applied thereto concurrently with a SYNC pulse. Similarly, AND gate 26b has an a second input the inverted output of code generator 25. Therefore gate 26b provides pulses 43 only when the coded pulse train provides a logical 'zero" or negative signals. Gating circuit 27 is diagramatically shown as gated switch 60 controlled by the output of gate generator 26a indicated by numeral 42 for passing the output of video amplifier 22 therethrough on signal line 61. Circuit 27 further includes gated switch 62 controlled by the output of gate generator 26b indicated by numeral 43 for passing the output of video amplifier 22 therethrough on signal line 63. The combination of gate generator 26 and 27 functions as follows. If the delay between the second and fourth pulse trains provided by generators 12 and 25 is exactly the same as the time required for each successive pulse to be transmitted, reflected from the ground, and received, so that the first return or video pulse of each repetitive code word is synchronized with a first gating pulse, then every video pulse in the word is synchronized with a gating pulse, and a maximum signal is supplied to the integrater 30 through conductor 63, the positive input to ADDER 29. In these circumstances the output of the integrator will be sufficiently near the reference signal input 32 provided to comparator 31. Accordingly, comparator 31 provides a high voltage signal 50 so as to prevent counter 34 from counting. In these circumstances the delay provided by the delay line 24 remains constant thereby maintaining the output pulse train from code generator 25 to be exactly in sync with the received pulses indicated by video amplifier 22. However, if the delay is such that the first video pulse is synchronized with some gating pulse other than the first one, some of the other video pulses are not synchronized with any gating pulse, and the integrater receives a smaller signal. The output 50 of comparator 32 indicates such a condition and allows counter 34 to begin counting and monotonically changing the digital signal output presented to programmable delay line 24 so as to further delay the pulse train provided by code generator 25 until synchronization is obtained as aforesaid. Through the frequency controlling mechanism of the preset invention, all of the gates provided by gate generator 26 move inbound or outbound relative to the video pulses derived from the received transmitter pulses by virtue of clock signal C2 being advanced or retarded. This has the effort of changing the "gate clock' frequency of the pulse train output of divider 23. As the "gate clock" frequency is increased, the gates will move inbound. As the frequency is decreased, the gates will move outbound. If the frequency is not shifted, the gates will remain stationary relative to the transmitted pulses provided by divider 11. Note that if the code generator (12 and 25) is random, the number of pulses applied to gates 42 and 43 are within one of each other. Since ADDER 29 sums the positive and DC inverted VIDEO signals, the integrator 30 output due to noise components on the VIDEO signals for each word in near zero. Thus the integrator output is indicative of virtually only the contribution of video signals which match code pulses. This will be further described. This circuit combination provides highly suppressed interference and ground clutter and false signals. Figures 2A-2I illustrate the operation of the system for a simple case of a "7-bit" word, one with seven pulse positions. FIGURE 2a shows the gating word pulses "G', such as those provided by gate 26a, properly synchronized with the return video pulses WV". FIGURES 2B, 2C, 2D and 2E show the gating word successively 1, 2, 3 and 4 pulse positions too early, and FIGURES 2F, 2G, 2H and 21 show the gating word successively 1, 2, 3 and 4 pulse positions too late. Note that in FIGURE 2A four pulses per video word, those marked with x, coincide with gating pulses, while each of FIGURES 2B and 21 only two pulses per video word coincide with gating pulses. Thus, for even this short word, an integrator output corresponding to three or fewer coincident pulses is indicative that synchronization is not properly complete. For words with a greater number of bits, the output differences between correctly and incorrectly synchronized signals is even greater. In FIGURES 2A-2I both the video pulses and the gating pulses are shown to be of square wave form--this is not generally the case in practice. The gate pulses can be substantially square, but the video pulses are unavoidably degrated. FIGURE 3 shows a wave form closer to what can be expected. Here curve G shows a gating pulse, and curve V shows the associated video pulse. The electronics are set up so that when the curves intersect to the specific area A, catarator 31 and corresponding decision signal give a zero output and counter 34 is in a HOLD statue. If the Erei reduces to that indicated by A1 in FIGURE 3b, counter 34 is accuated stepwise to count up to cause gate pulse G to occur later, while if the area increases to that indicated by A2 in FIGURE 3c counter 34 is accuated stepJwise to count down to CESSE. pulse G to occur earlier. This result repeating in each case until area A is again achieved. Note that only when proper synchronization has been achieved does a maximum number of such instances take place. The operation of the system is as follows. Under the control of clock 10 and code generator 12, a continual sequence of pulses with PRN coding is transmitted from antenna 17, and a like sequence of coded pulses is supplied to gate generator 26 after delay in line 24. Return pulses from antenna 20 cause the video pulses presented to gating circuit 27. When the system is in a search mode, the inegrator output is low causing counter 34 to step through its range repeatedly for each clock input signal 75 in a predetermined direction. At some point in the sweep the gating pulses come into appropriate synchronism with the return pulses, to the extent that each gating pulse overlaps the video pulse. A signal of sufficient magnitude is strongly supplied through integrator 30 to change logic 33 from its search state to its track status as indicated at 35. In the track mode, if the video pulses and the gate pulses overlap by an area A, the integrater signal to comparator 31 is equal to the reference 32, and the comparator gives no output, so that logic 33, counter 34 and indicator 36 remain in their present condition. Movement of the aircraft with respect to the ground, however, changes the delay of video signal V, to changed the overlap area to some other value A1 or A2, and a signal to comparator 31 changes so that an "up" or "down" output is so plied to logic 33 and cause operation of counter 34 to adjus delay line 24 in a sense to change the area toward t area A. From the above it will be evident that the invention comprises apparatus employing pseudo random pulse coding to enable increased pulse repetition frequency in a radar system without introduction of ambiguity into the signals. It will be evident that t:. arranagement has a high tolerance to interference, cit intentional or incidental, since any interfering sign must comprise pulses having the particular pseudo r (PRN) coding in order to appreciably affect the apparatus. The synchronizing apparatus of the present invention has been illustrated by use of a radar altimeter. Numerous characteristics and advantages 0 the invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure an, function of the invention. However, the synchronizing apparatus of the present invention may be employed wb-: it is necessary to synchronize two pulse trains separate in time by an unknown condition and synchronized with derived from a common clock signal or pulse train. Nevertheless, changes may be made in detail especial matters of shape, size, and arrangement of parts, wiz the principals of the invention, to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms which the appended claims are expressed. Specificalli phase shifter or a shift register may be substituted for programmable delay line 24. Since the output of programmable delay line provides a second clock signal delay with respect to the first clock signal, from which both of these derive subsequent pulse trains for comparison and synchronization, there are many ways to provide such delay. A common shift register is one such technique for providing a programmable delay line. Another example is a discreet phase shifter also responsive to the output of counter 34 for monotonically changing the phase or delay of a second clock signal relative to the first clock signal.

Claims: Claims: 1. Synchronizing apparatus c h a r a c t e r i z e d by: a) means (11 - 13) for providing a first train of pulses having a predetermined repetition frequency; b) means (21) for receiving a second train of pulses derived from said first train of pulses delayed by an unknown time delay; c) delay means (24) responsive to a command signal for producing a third train of pulses derived from said first train of pulses, said third train of pulses being substantially identical to said first train of pulses but which is delayed in time in accordance with said command signal; d) comparator means (31) responsive to said second train of pulses and said third train of pulses for pro viding decision signals indicative of at least (iss substantial synchronization of said second and third pulse trains and (ii) non-synchronization thereof; ; e) control means (34) responsive to said decision signal for providing said command signal such that said third train of pulses is selectively advanced and re tarded by monotonic increments with respect to said first pulse train. 2. An apparatus according to claim 1, c h a r a c t e i z e d b y: a') means (10) for providing a first clock signal at first frequency; f) first divider means for dividing said first c.òcY; signal by a factor N thereby providing the first pulse train; g) first means (12 - 13) for providing a second pulse train derived from said first pulse train; h) second means (23 - 25) for deriving from said rils clock signal a third pulse train substantially identical to said second pulse train but which I delayed with respect thereto by an amount in ac cordance with a command signal, b') means for receiving a fourth pulse train (21) derived from said first pulse train delayed in time by an unknown time delay; ; d') comparator means (31) responsive to said third pulse train and said fourth pulse train for providing decision signals indicative of at least (i) sub stantial synchronization of said second and third pulse trains and (ii) non-synchronization thereof; e) control means (34) responsive to said decision signal for providing said command signal such that said third pulse train may be selectively advanced and retarded by monotonic time increments with respect to said second pulse train. 3. Apparatus according to claim 2, c h a r a c t e r i z e d i n t h a t said first means (12 - 13) in cludes means (12) for providing said first pulse train with a repetitive pseudo random code, and said second means (23 - 25) includes means (25) for providing said third pulse train with a repetitive pseudo random code (25) identical to said first pulse train. 4. An apparatus according to claim 2 or 3, c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y: i) first coding means (12) for deriving from said first pulse train a second pulse train having a repetitive code; c') delay means (24) responsive to a command signal for providing a second clock signal derived from said first clock signal, said second clock signal being substantially identical to said first clock signal but which is delayed in time in accordance with said command signal; k) second divider means (23) for dividing said second clock signal by N thereby generating a third pulse train substantially identical to said first pulse train but which is delayed with respect thereto; 1) second coding means (25) for deriving from said third pulse train a fourth pulse train having a said repetitive code; ; m) means (21) for receiving a fifth pulse train derived from said second pulse train delayed in accordance with an unknown time delay; d') comparator means (31) responsive to said fourth pulse train and said fifth pulse train for pro viding signals indicative of a least (i) sub stantial synchronization of said fourth and fifth pulse trains and (ii) non-synchronization thereof; e) control means (34) responsive to said decision signals for providing said command signal such that said fourth pulse train may be selectively advanced and retarded by monotonic time increments with respect to said fifth pulse train. 5. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, c h a r a c t e r i z e d i n t h a t said con trol means comprises'an up/down counter (34) for pro viding said command signal, said command signal being representative of a repetitive digital count, said counter having a first input responsive to said decision signals for selectively enabling said count er to count in accordance with said state of said decision signal. 6. An apparatus according to one of the claims 1 to 5, c h a r a c t e r i z e d I n t h a t said delay means (24) is a programmable delay line for passing said first pulse train of pulses therethrough and having a delay in accordance with said command signal. 7. An apparatus according to one of the claims 1 to 5, c h a r a c t e r i z e d I n t h a t said delay means comprises a shift register responsive to said first pulse train and said command signal. 8. An apparatus according to claim 6 or 7, c h a r a c t e r i z e d i n t h a t said second means includes a divider means for dividing said delayed first clock signal by N where N is an integer.

Inventors: BJORKE, MERLIN D.
Applicants: HONEYWELL INC.
Application year: 1985
Main classification: G01S13
IPC codes: G01S13, H03K5, H04L7