MEASURING CHARACTERISTICS OF AN ULTRASONIC WAVE MEDIUM

Abstract: A characteristic, for example attenuation slope coef­ ficient, of an ultrasonic wave medium is determined from a received signal, arising from reflection of a transmitted ultrasonic wave in the medium, on a real-time basis em­ ploying only time domain calculations. In some embodiments, the phase difference () be­ tween a received signal and a reference signal is determined using EXCLUSIVE OR gates (61, 62) or a quadrature detector (14) and a signal conversion circuit (7) using an inverse trigonometric relation stored in a ROM (73, 738­ ). The phase difference is input to a differentiator (8) which outputs the center frequency shift of the received signal on a real-time basis. The center fre­ quency shift is input to another differentiator (10) which outputs the attenuation slope coefficient (β). In other embodiments, the received signal is distributed into received signal bands, having different center frequen­ cies (by filters 17-1 to 17-m), and signal characteristics of the received signal bands are averaged, for example phase difference () determined as above for each band, or a first derivative (<  >) of phase difference, to remove virtually all effects of spectrum scalloping in the time domain. Thus, the attenuation slope coefficient for ex­ ample is obtained without the effects of spectrum scalloping using simple hardware and without Fourier transformation.

Description: The present invention relates to the measurement of characteristics of an ultrasonic wave medium. In particular the invention concerns the utilization of a center frequency shift method for measuring characteristics of an ultrasonic wave medium. A center frequency shift method is a known method for obtaining the attenuation constant in an ultrasonic wave medium. In this method, as illustrated in Fig.1, the power spectrum A(f) of a transmitted ultrasonic wave has a Gaussian distribution expressed as In equation (1), K is a constant, the standard deviation σ is a constant proportional to the bandwidth and dependent on the shape of the spectrum of the transmitted ultrasonic wave and f o is the center frequency. The power spectrum of the received signal A'(f) also has a Gaussian distribution which is expressed as follows, where f r is the center frequency of the received signal: If it is assumed that the attenuation within the medium has the form: where z is the distance between the transmitting/receiving transducer and the reflecting surface, f is the frequency, β is the attenuation slope coefficient and "4" allows for traversing the distance z twice and conversion of pressure into power, then K' and f r are defined by the following equations: f r = f o - 4σ ²∫ o z β(z)dz (4) Therefore, the attenuation slope coefficient β can be obtained in the form indicated below by detecting the center frequency f r of the received signal. β(z) = (1/4 σ ²) d/dz (f o - f r ) (5) However, the received signal waveform is distorted and its spectrum deviates from a Gaussian distribution, and therefore the center frequency cannot be obtained easily. To overcome this problem, the following method has been used by the prior art to obtain the center frequency f r . The power spectrum |P(f)|² is first obtained by a Fourier transformation of the time domain waveform of the received signal for a certain time window T, and then the average frequency f is obtained according to equation (6) as the first moment of the power spectrum. The average frequency f is then used as the center frequency f r in equation (5) and a value for the attenuation slope coefficient β is obtained using equation (5). A drawback of this method is the relatively large amount of time required for calculating the power spectrum and the first moment, and therefore, it has been difficult to obtain the distribution of β on a real time basis. In addition to deviation from a Gaussian distribution, the power spectrum of the received signal is subjected to "spectrum scalloping", which is caused by overlapping of the pulses in the received signal waveform due to reflection from random reflectors located close together in the medium. One attempt to remove spectrum scalloping in the application of ultrasonic wave detection for medical diagnosis has been to average echo envelope signals for several frequency bands. The object of this method is to remove the "speckle pattern" in the B-mode imaging. The speckle pattern is caused by interference from the spectrum scalloping and prevents the detection of small focal lesions. The speckle pattern varies with the frequency, so the averaging is effective in reducing the speckle pattern in the B-mode. This method uses linear processing and reduces the spatial resolution of the B-mode image. As a result, prior art devices using this method cannot be used for diagnosis of small focal lesions but only for diffusive lesions of a large organ such as the liver. Spectrum scalloping can be broken into two types, slow scalloping, caused by reflection points which are very close together and rapid scalloping, caused by reflection points which are further apart. One of the inventors of the present invention has developed a method for removing rapid scalloping, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application No.58-45396 and European Patent Application No.84301789.8, publication No.0 119 844 published 26th September 1984, incorporated herein by reference. This method employs a lifter in cepstrum to remove rapid scallop, inverse transforms to the power spectrum and calculation of higher order moments such as M₂ and M₃ of the power spectrum. This method may be used to recover the true centroid from a power spectrum distorted by scallop and frequency dependent reflection. The drawback of this method is that it requires a great deal of processing in the frequency domain. If the processing is performed by hard-wired circuitry to obtain the attenuation slope coefficient β as fast as possible, the cost of the equipment is extremely high. If some of the processing is performed by a programmed microcomputer, real-time calculation is not possible. In order to avoid calculation in the frequency domain, methods have been developed, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Nos.58-77226 and 58-142893, both incorporated herein by reference, which calculate the moments of the power spectrum without using Fourier transformation. In these methods, the in-phase and quadrature components of the received signal waveform or the autocorrelation function of the received signal waveform are used to calculate the moments of the power spectrum. While these methods do generate the attenuation slope coefficient β in real time, they do not remove the effects of spectrum scalloping. Methods used in other fields to remove unwanted signal characteristics have been considered in attempting to solve the problems of the prior art. "Frequency agility" is used in radar systems as disclosed in Beasley, E.W. and Ward, H.R.., "A Quantitative Analysis of Sea Clutter Decorrelation with Frequency Agility", IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol.4, (1968), pps. 468-473; Gustafson, B.G. and As, B.O., "System Properties of Jumping Frequency Radars", Philips Telecommunication Review, Vol.25, (1964), pps.70-76; and Ray, H. "Improving Radar Range and Angle Detection with Frequency Agility", Microwave Journal, Vol.9, (1966), pps.63-68. Ultrasonic flaw detection systems use "spectrum wobbling", disclosed in Koryachenko, V.D., "Statistical Processing of Flaw Detector Signals to Enhance the Signal-to-Noise Ratio Associated with Structural Reverberation Noise", Soviet Journal of Non-Destructive Testing, Vol.11, (1975) pps. 69-75, and "split spectrum", disclosed in Newhouse, V.L., et al., "Flaw-to-Grain Echo Enhancement", Proceedings of Ultrasonics International '79, Graz, Austria, (1979), pp.152-157 and Newhouse, V.L. and Bilgutay, N.M. et al., "Flaw Visibility Enhancement by Split-Spectrum Processing Techniques", Proceedings '81 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, (1981). The radar techniques vary the transmitted frequency periodically to decorrelate (randomize) the clutter echoes and use non-linear processing such as square-law-detection and averaging over the frequencies transmitted. Spectrum wobbling is a similar technique used in ultrasonic flaw detection. In the split-spectrum method, a single wideband pulse is transmitted and the received signal is separated by several filters. In both the spectrum wobbling and split-spectrum methods, the resulting signals are cross-correlated using non-linear processing and then averaged to suppress the grain echoes of the material being tested for flaws. Thus, both the radar and flaw detection systems are designed to suppress parts of the received signals such as grain and clutter and to emphasise the "specular boundary" or shape of the object reflecting signal. An objective in embodiments of the present invention is to produce the opposite effect, that is, to suppress those parts of the signal indicating specular boundaries and to emphasise those characteristics of the signal which indicate the nature of the object reflecting the signal. In summary, no prior art method or apparatus has been disclosed which can obtain ultrasonic wave characteristics of a medium, including the attenuation slope coefficient β, without any spectrum scalloping in real time using low-cost equipment. EP-A-0 077 585 discloses an apparatus for measuring ultrasonic wave attenuation of a medium using an ultrasonic wave pulse transmitted into the medium and received as a received signal after reflection from different depths within this medium. The received signal is amplified (210) and sent to band-pass filters (221a to 221n) which have equal bandwidths which adjoin one another. The outputs of the band-pass filters are subject to envelope detection (222a to 222n), i.e. rectification and low-pass filtering. Correction factors are applied to the outputs of the envelope detectors, to correct the 'near-field' effect (c.f. 225a to 225n, 230, 231). In the processing circuit 240 (see Fig. 6), 241 and 242 are summation circuits which produce, respectively, (a) the sum of the (corrected) outputs of the envelope detectors, and (b) the sum of the (corrected) outputs of the envelope detectors each weighted by a factor corresponding to the nominal centre frequency of the band-pass filter (221a to 221n) to which it relates. The sums (a) and (b) are divided in a divider 243. The output of the divider is differentiated in a unit 250 to generate an attenuation slope coefficient. According to the present invention there is provided an apparatus for measuring the ultrasonic wave attenuation of a medium using an ultrasonic wave pulse transmitted into the medium and received as a received signal after reflection from different depths within this medium, characterised by: means for supplying a reference signal; means, operatively connected to said reference signal supplying means and operatively connected to receive the received signal, for determining a phase difference between the received signal and the reference signal; first differentiating means, operatively connected to said phase difference determining means, for differentiating the phase difference with respect to time to generate a frequency shift amount signal; and second differentiating means, operatively connected to said first differentiating means, for differentiating the frequency shift amount signal with respect to time to generate an attenuation slope coefficient. According to the present invention there is provided a method for measuring the ultrasonic wave attenuation of an object, comprising the steps of: (a) sending an ultrasonic wave pulse toward an object the attenuation of which is to be measured; (b) receiving a received signal comprised of ultrasonic waves reflected from different depths within this object; characterised by: (c) generating a reference signal; (d) determining a phase difference between the received signal and the reference signal; (e) differentiating the phase difference with respect to time to generate a frequency shift amount; and (f) differentiating the frequency shift amount with respect to time to generate an attenuation slope coefficient. According to the present invention there is provided an apparatus for measuring the ultrasonic wave attenuation of a medium using an ultrasonic wave pulse transmitted into the medium and received as a received signal after reflection from different depths within this medium, comprising: signal distributing means, operatively connected to receive the received signal, for distributing the received signal into at least three signal channels corresponding to respective frequency bands, and characterised by means for supplying a reference signal for each of the signal channels, calculation and averaging means connected to receive signals derived from each of said signal channels and operable to determine an average differential with respect to time of phase difference between the distributed signal and the reference signal in each of the said channels, and differentiating means, operatively connected to the calculation and averaging means, for differentiating with respect to time the average differential provided by the calculation and averaging means, to generate an attenuation slope coefficient. According to the present invention there is provided a method of measuring the ultrasonic wave attenuation of a medium using an ultrasonic wave pulse transmitted into the medium and received as a received signal after reflection from different depths within this medium, comprising: distributing the received signal into at least three signal channels corresponding to respective frequency bands, and characterised by supplying a reference signal for each of the signal channels, determining for signals derived from each of said signal channels an average differential with respect to time of phase difference between the distributed signal and the reference signal in each of the said channels, and differentiating with respect to time said average differential to generate an attenuation slope coefficient. Embodiments of the present invention are operable to detect a characteristic of a medium using an ultrasonic wave transmitted into the medium and received as a received signal after reflection in the medium. The embodiments operate to determine a centre frequency shift, between the transmitted ultrasonic wave and a receiving signal, by deriving a quantity representing the derivative with respect to time (or depth into the medium) of phase difference between the received signal and a reference signal (which may correspond for example to the centre frequency of the transmitted ultrasonic wave, or which may be adjustable). The said derivative may be obtained by differentiating a signal  corresponding to the phase difference between the received signal and the reference signal The signal  corresponding to the said phase difference may be obtained by using a quadrature detector circuit to obtain in-phase I and quadrature Q components of the received signal (with respect to the reference signal) and by signal conversion of the I and Q components to obtain  (e.g. as tan⁻¹ Q / I). Alternatively  may be obtained as illustrated in Figures 6 below. To avoid the effects of spectrum scalloping the received signal may be divided into a plurality of different received signal bands to obtain such a quantity representing such a said derivative with averaging over the different bands. That is, a received signal may be divided into a plurality of received signal bands, and a quantity representing such a derivative may be obtained by averaging between the signal bands. For example, respective values of  obtained for the different bands may be averaged and the average differentiated to obtain the quantity. Alternatively, signals derived from the respective bands (e.g. I and Q components applicable to the respective bands) may be employed (e.g. on the basis of an autocorrelation function and moments of power spectrum) to provide an average (e.g. a weighted average) such quantity. Embodiments of the present invention provide real-time operation. Fourier transformation is not required. Effects of scalloping can be removed in the time domain. Thus, according to an aspect of the present invention there is provided an apparatus for real-time detection of a characteristic of a medium, operable to transmit an ultrasonic wave into the medium and to receive, as a received signal, consequent ultrasonic reflections from the medium, comprising means operable to derive, on a real-time basis and by calculation in the time domain, a quantity representing the derivative with respect to time, or depth into the medium, of phase difference between the received signal and a reference signal, or by representing an average such derivative. An embodiment of the present invention can provide an apparatus for measuring the distribution of ultrasonic wave characteristics in a medium, particularly an apparatus using a centre frequency shift method for example for measuring ultrasonic wave attenuation constant distribution with high spatial resolution on a real time basis using simple hardware, without obtaining a reflected wave spectrum and including the ability to remove spectrum scalloping in the time domain. An embodiment of the present invention can overcome the problems of the prior art by providing a system for obtaining ultrasonic wave characteristics which removes spectrum scalloping in the time domain. An embodiment of the present invention can provide a system which obtains the distribution of the attenuation slope coefficient on a real-time basis by estimating the center frequency of a received signal from a profile of the phase difference between the received signal and a reference signal and by estimating a shift of the center frequency of the received signal on a real-time basis using simple hardware and without calculating the power spectrum and the first moment in the frequency domain. An embodiment of the present invention can provide a system for obtaining ultrasonic wave characteristics including the attenuation slope coefficient which removes effects of frequency independent reflection. In an embodiment of the present invention there is provided a circuit which determines the phase difference between a received signal and a reference signal and passes the phase difference through a differentiating circuit to find the amount of frequency shift between the frequencies of the received signal and the reference signal. The signal representing the frequency shift amount passes through another differentiating circuit and is multiplied by a constant to find the attenuation slope coefficient. Several embodiments of the present invention utilize a quadrature detector circuit and a signal conversion circuit to find the phase difference between the reference and received signals. The quadrature detector circuit multiplies the received signal by the reference signal and by the reference signal shifted by 90 ° to generate two components defining this phase difference. These components and a trigonometric table stored in a ROM are used to find the phase difference in the signal conversion circuit. Another embodiment of the present invention generates the phase difference by passing the input signal simultaneously through two EXCLUSIVE OR circuits, the other input of one of the EXCLUSIVE OR circuits being the reference signal and the other EXCLUSIVE OR circuit receiving a signal corresponding to the reference signal shifted by 90° . From the output of these two EXCLUSIVE OR circuits, the phase difference can be determined. As a result, apparatus embodying the present invention obtains the attenuation slope coefficient without using the power spectrum and is therefore less expensive and operates in real time. Apparatus embodying the present invention can be provided which can substantially remove all effects of spectrum scalloping by distributing the received signal into received signal bands and calculating signal characteristics for each of the received signal bands. An averaging circuit averages the signal characteristics and subsequent circuits provide any further processing necessary to output the tissue characteristics including the attenuation slope coefficient. In place of calculation of the phase difference as one of the signal characteristics, circuits calculate the autocorrelation function for each of the received signal bands in one of the embodiments, and then calculate moments of the power spectrum from which an average frequency and the attenuation slope coefficient can be calculated. Reference is made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings, in which like reference signs refer to like items throughout, and in which:- Fig.1 is a graph of the power spectrum of transmitted and receiving signals; Fig.2 is a block diagram of a first embodiment of the present invention; Fig.3A is a block diagram of a first example of the signal conversion circuit 7 in Fig.2; Fig.3B is a block diagram of a second example of the signal conversion circuit 7 in Fig.2; Fig.4 is a symbolic diagram of an EXCLUSIVE OR gate; Fig.5 is a graph of the relationship between phase  and the mean voltage Vout output by an EXCLUSIVE OR gate; Fig.6A is a graph of reference signals REFO and REF1; Fig.6B is a symbolic diagram of the EXCLUSIVE ORing of an input signal INPUT with reference signals REFO and REF1; Fig.6C is a graph of the relationship of the phase  of the input signal to Vout0 and Vout1; Fig.7A is a graph of the power spectrum of the received signal; Fig.7B and 7C are graphs of phase  versus time; Fig.7D is a graph of d/dt versus time; Fig.8 is a block diagram of a third example of the signal conversion circuit 7 in Fig.2; Fig.9 is a block diagram of a second embodiment of the present invention; Fig.10 is a block diagram of a third embodiment of the present invention having multiple phase detectors and an averaging circuit to remove the effects of spectrum scalloping; Fig.11 is a graph of the phase difference versus the depth of the reflection for a device according to the third embodiment of the present invention having 11 frequency bands or channels; Fig.12 is a block diagram of a fourth embodiment of the present invention in which the average frequency is obtained without first finding the phase difference; Fig.13 is a block diagram of a fifth embodiment of the present invention in which multiple quadrature detectors and a feedback loop of the type used in the second embodiment are provided to remove the effects of spectrum scalloping; and Fig.14(A)-14(C) are graphs describing the operation of the fifth embodiment illustrated in Fig.13. An apparatus embodying the present invention determines the attenuation slope coefficient β in real time instead of obtaining the power spectrum and the first moment. The phase of a received signal is compared with a reference signal, and if the phase difference is constant, the received signal has the same frequency as the reference signal. If the phase of the received signal increases over time compared to the reference signal, the received signal has a higher frequency, whereas if it decreases, the received signal has a lower frequency than the reference signal. Using this basic relationship between phase and frequency, the frequency difference f r - ν between the received frequency f r and the reference frequency ν is obtained by differentiating the phase difference with respect to time, and the attenuation slope coefficient β is then obtained from equation (5). The reference signal x(t) and received signal y(t), which is an echo signal representing sonic pressure, can be represented by the following equations in which ν, ϑ o , f r and ϑ r are constant if one uses the average frequency f for f r when the received signal has a wide frequency band: x(t) = sin (2πνt + ϑ o ) (7) y(t) = sin (2πf r t + ϑ r ) (8) The phase difference  o (t) of the received signal can then be represented as:  o (t) = 2π(f r -ν) t + (ϑ r - ϑ o ) (9) and differentiating the above formula with respect to time leads to: d o (t)/dt = 2π (f r -ν) (10) From equations (5) and (10) it is easy to see that the attenuation slope coefficient can be found using d o /dt. Figure 2 is a block diagram of a first embodiment of the present invention wherein a signal is transmitted from one or more transducers into a medium under examination. A received signal, reflected by the medium, is input to a quadrature detector circuit 14 which includes a reference signal oscillator 1 with an oscillation frequency of ν (e.g. f o ), a 90° phase shifter 2, analog multipliers 3 and 4, and low-pass filters 5 and 6. The reflected signal, having been received and amplified, is input, as the received signal, to the quadrature detector 14 from which the in-phase component I and quadrature component Q are obtained. For example, if the reference signal is 2 cos 2πνt and the received signal has a frequency spectrum between f e and f u , then the output of the multipliers 3 and 4 will have two frequency bands (f e -ν) to f u -ν) and (f e +ν) to (f u +ν). The low-pass filters 5 and 6 reject the higher of these two frequency bands. The components I and Q are input to the signal conversion circuit 7 and  (shown as in the Figure) = tan⁻¹ (Q/I) is output. The output of  = tan⁻¹(Q/I) obtained in the signal conversion circuit 7 is differentiated by a differentiating circuit 7 and is then smoothed by a low-pass filter 9. A first example of the structure of the signal conversion circuit 7 is illustrated in Fig.3A, in which components I and Q are converted from analog signals to digital signals in analog/digital converters 71 and 72 and then input to a conversion table ROM 73 to determine tan⁻¹(Q/I). The value read out for tan⁻¹(Q/I) is converted to an analog signal in a digital/analog converter 74 and is then output as the phase . Figure 3B is a second example of the signal conversion circuit 7. As shown in Fig.3B, it is also possible to obtain the value of the phase  by dividing Q/I in an analog divider 75 and inputting it to the ROM 73 after converting Q/I to a digital signal in an analog/digital converter 77. The signs of I and Q, which specify the quadrant of the phase  are determined by voltage comparators 76 and 78 and are input to the ROM 73 along with the digital Q/I signal. This method offers advantages in that only one A/D converter is required and the table in the ROM 73 may be smaller without losing accuracy. Figures 7A-7D are graphs illustrating the process of obtaining respective signals until the center frequency shift Δf = f r -ν is obtained. Figure 7A is a graph of the power spectrum of the received signal. As time passes, t = t₁, t₂, t₃,....., the ultrasonic wave is reflected from deeper areas, high frequency components are attenuated and the center frequency shifts to lower frequencies f₂ and f₃. Figs.7B-7D are profiles of the phase difference  o (t) and d(t)/dt which are obtained from (t) = tan⁻¹(Q/I) when the reference frequency ν (e.g. f o ) of the reference signal oscillator 1 is used as f₂. As can be easily estimated from equation (9) and as is illustrated in Fig.7B,  o (t) increases continuously while the center frequency f r of the received spectrum is higher than ν (in the period where t < t₂), does not change when the center frequency f r is equal to the reference frequency ν (when t = t₂) and continuously decreases when the center frequency f r is lower than the reference frequency ν (in the period where t > t₂). The table in the ROM 73 gives values of (t) = tan⁻¹(Q/I) within the range of -π ≦ (t) ≦ π, so the values of (t) output by the signal conversion circuit 7 are as depicted in Fig.7C. Therefore, d(t)/dt, as depicted in Fig.7D, includes impulse noise during the periods that (t) changes in value from π to -π (a change known as wrap around). The low-pass filter 9 in Fig.2 is provided to eliminate such noise. When the difference Δf between the reference frequency and the received frequency f r is large, o(t) indicates a 2π change of phase within a very short period of time and, as a result, the impulse noise in the d(t)/dt signal increases considerably and can no longer be easily removed. A feedback loop that changes the reference frequency ν to be almost equal to the received frequency f r solves this problem so that (t) changes gradually. A second embodiment of the present invention using such a feedback loop is illustrated in Fig.9. In Fig.9, the elements which are the same as those in Fig.2 are given the same reference numerals and no further explanation of these elements is necessary. The only difference between the Fig.9 circuit and the circuit of Fig.2 is that the reference signal oscillator 1 is replaced by a variable frequency voltage controlled oscillator 15 for producing a reference frequency ν controlled by the signal from a level adjusting circuit 16 which depends on the output ( = tan⁻¹(Q/I) of the differentiating circuit 8: the reference frequency ν is controlled through the feedback loop so that the reference frequency ν is raised when  (t) is increasing, and lowered when (t) is decreasing. Therefore, even if the center frequency (or average frequency) f r of the received signal drops, the reference frequency ν from the oscillator 15 also drops and f r - ν is kept almost constant, so that wrap around will rarely occur because excessive changes in (t) are prevented. If wrap around is completely removed, the low-pass filter 9 is not needed. Alternatively, other hardware or software could be used to generate values for (t) similar to those depicted in Fig.7B. A block diagram of an alternate embodiment of the present invention utilizing software would look the same as Fig.9, with the level adjusting circuit 16 comprising a microprocessor programmed to adjust the level of the input voltage of the variable oscillator 15. Other modifications to the above embodiments are also possible. The center frequency shift Δf can be obtained without first finding the phase difference o(t) as in the fourth embodiment illustrated in Fig.12 and described below, in which the center frequency shift Δf is obtained from the moments of the power spectrum calculated in the time domain. Also, a method, which can be applied to the present invention, for removing wrap around using software is described in J.M. Tribolet, "A New Phase Unwrapping algorithm", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL.ASSP-25, NO.2, APRIL 1977, pp.170-177. As explained above, the output of the low-pass filter 9 of Fig.2 [d(t)/dt] LPF is proportional to the center frequency shift Δf. The attenuation slope coefficient β in equation (5) can be obtained from the output [d(t)/dt] LPF by dividing [d(t)/dt] LPF by -8πσ² and differentiating it with respect to the distance z . But since (where C is the velocity of sound in the medium being studied and is assumed constant for applications of this invention and t is the time since sending the ultrasonic wave), differentiation with respect to z can be replaced by differentiation with respect to time t in the differentiating circuit 10 of Fig.2. The attenuation slope coefficient β(z) can be obtained by multiplying by a constant K = -1/(4πCσ²) in the amplifier 11 after differentiation. In the above explanation, the spectrum of the received signal is assumed to have Gaussian distribution, just like the spectrum of the transmitted signal . Even if the received signal does not have a Gaussian distribution, since the average frequency shift is obtained by differentiating tan⁻¹(Q/I) with respect to time t , an approximate value of the attenuation slope coefficient β will be obtained through the operations explained above. Also, tan⁻¹(Q/I) was obtained above as an analog signal and the differentiation and low-pass filtering were carried out on analog signals, but it is of course possible to use the output of the ROM 73 as a digital signal and then perform succeeding steps using digital circuitry. In the first and second embodiments of the present invention, the phase  may be obtained using cos⁻¹ or sin⁻¹ in place of tan⁻¹ . A circuit which can be used as the signal conversion circuit 7 in Fig.2 for finding  = cos⁻¹ (I/√ I² + Q² ) is illustrated in Fig.8. The operation and purpose of the comparators 76 and 78, the divider 75, A/D converter 77, D/A converter 74 in Fig.8 are similar to the elements in Fig.3B having the same reference numerals. The comparators 76 and 78 in Fig.8 aid in distinguishing 0 ≦  ≦ π from π ≦  ≦ 2π. The difference between ROM 738 and ROM 73 is in the contents of the stored table. In Figure 8, multipliers 81 and 82 form the square of components I and Q, respectively. An adder 83 sums the squares and a square root generating circuit 84 generates the divisor (√ I² + Q² ) for the divider 75. The square root generating circuit 84 as well as the multipliers 3,4, 81 and 82 and divider 75 can all be implemented using an MC1595L multiplier manufactured by Motorola, and, as needed, an operational amplifier. In the first and second embodiments of the present invention calculations such as tan⁻¹ and cos⁻¹ may be omitted by employing a phase comparator which generates an output proportional to a phase difference. For example, as is well known, when a pair of square waves INPUT 1 and INPUT 2 are input to an EXCLUSIVE OR circuit as illustrated in Fig.4, the mean value Vout of the output OUTPUT is proportional to the phase difference  between the two square waves INPUT 1 and INPUT 2. The relation between  and Vout becomes linear as shown in Fig.5 and a value of  = K'Vout (where K' is a proportional constant) can be directly obtained without executing calculations of tan⁻¹ and cos⁻¹ . However, as can be seen in Fig.5, the same value of Vout is obtained for positive and negative values of  and these values of  cannot be distinguished when only two signals are used. To solve this problem, square waves REF0 and REF1, having a phase difference of 90° (as illustrated in Fig.6A), are used as reference signals. The received signal is converted into a square wave INPUT by a waveform converter 60 which may comprise an amplifier and a level slicer (not shown). The converted received signal is input to EXCLUSIVE ORs (61 and 62) along with each of the reference signals (REF0 and REF1, respectively) as illustrated in Fig.6B. Low pass filters 63 and 64 are then used to generate mean values Vout0 and Vout1 from the outputs OUT0 and OUT1, respectively. The relationship between the phase  of the converted received signal INPUT and Vout0 and Vout1 is the saw-tooth phase characteristic which is illustrated in Fig.6C and stored in the saw-tooth phase characteristic circuit 65, therefore: Vout1 ≦ V TH when  ≧ 0 Vout1 > V TH when  < 0 for -180° ≦  ≦ 180°. From the above relationship, the sign (positive or negative) of the phase  can be determined. It is obvious that the absolute value of the phase || can be easily obtained from || = K'Vout0 and therefore the phase  itself can be obtained easily in the saw-tooth phase characteristic circuit 65 without the complicated calculations required for finding the tan⁻¹ and cos⁻¹ functions. In the first and second embodiments of the present invention, the phase difference  between the received signal and the reference signal may be obtained by sampling the received signal at a frequency of several MHz after direct A/D conversion and by finding the phase difference  by digital processing of the sampled data using software or hardware. An example of a structure using digital processing is a combination of a high speed waveform sampling system and a computer. While the first and second embodiments of the present invention remove the effects of frequency independent reflection, spectrum scalloping remains in the received signal. The third through fifth embodiments of the present invention, illustrated in Figs.10, 12 and 13, respectively, are directed at removing effects of spectrum scalloping. The theory behind these three embodiments will now be developed. Japanese Patent Application No.58-45396 (European Patent Application No.84301789.8, Publication No.0 119 844) discloses a method of processing in the frequency domain for removing effects of spectrum scalloping. In this frequency domain method, a time-gated window of width T is used to obtain the power spectrum |P(f)|² by a Fourier transformation of the time-gated received signal. In the frequency domain, the average frequency f can be defined by equation (11): The moments of the power spectrum can therefore be found in the frequency domain as indicated in equations (12) and (13): M₀ = ∫|P(f)| ²df (12) M₁ = ∫f|P(f)|²df (13) This leads to the following equation (14) for average frequency: The average frequency f and power spectrum moments M₀, M₁, etc., can be calculated by circuits in the third through fifth embodiments because of relationships between values in the time and frequency domains. For example, the power spectrum, center frequency and moments are theoretically related to time-domain values such as the in-phase and quadrature components I and Q and the autocorrelation function R(τ) and its first and second derivatives R ˙(τ), (τ). The following equations (15) through (17) define the autocorrelation function of the power spectrum: R(τ) = ∫ |P(f)|²e j2πfτ df (15) R (τ) = 2πj ∫ f |P(f)|²e j2πfτ df, ( R (τ) = ∂R ∂τ ) (16) Solving equation (15)-(17) for τ = 0, the following equations (18) to (20) result: R (o) =∫ |P(f)|²df = M₀ (18) R (o) = 2πj ∫ f|P(f)|²df = 2πjM₁ (19) Defining the moments M₀ and M₁ in equation (12) in terms of R (o) and R ˙ (o) results in equation (21): Equations (22) to (27-2) can be derived from equations (18)-(21) and known formulas, where 〈〉 indicates averaging over time window T: M₀ = 〈I² + Q²〉 (23) M₁ = 1 2 〈 Q I - Q I 〉 + νM₀ (24) As indicated by Equations 21,22, 26 and 27, the average frequency f and the variance σ² in the frequency domain can be obtained from the autocorrelation function using the quadrature detector outputs which are calculated in the time domain, thus avoiding Fourier transformation into the frequency domain. The third embodiment of the present invention uses the first derivative  ˙ of the phase difference  which may be obtained by differentiating the phase difference  output by any of the circuits used in the first and second embodiments, or it may be obtained from the following equation (28): If  is time-averaged over a sufficiently long time period T, the average phase difference 〈 ˙〉 in the time domain has the following relationship, indicated in equation (29), with f and ν in the frequency domain: 〈  〉 = 2π f - 2πν (29) For short time periods T , the average of the first derivative of the phase difference 〈 ˙〉 has a variance caused by spectrum scalloping. If f is the average frequency of a frequency spectrum not subjected to spectrum scalloping, equation (30) would be applicable: where  r is random phase and  ˙ r /2π is random instantaneous frequency, caused by the spectrum scalloping. If the spectrum of the received signal is again assumed to have a Gaussian distribution and it is assumed that the attenuation slope coefficient β is linearly dependent on frequency, then the following equations are given by Kuc, R. et al., "Parametric Estimation of the Acoustic Attenuation coefficient Slope for Soft Liver", IEEE, 1976, Ultrasonic Symposium Proceedings, pps.44-47: f (z) = f (o) - B (z) (31) B (z) = 4σ² ∫ o z β(z) dz (32) Where z is the depth along the scan line from the surface and the transducer is located at the body surface, hence z = 0, t is the round-trip time to the depth z , σ is the standard deviation of the Gaussian spectrum, and C is the sound velocity which is assumed constant for all kinds of tissue. The scan line is the line along which the pulse is transmitted and along which the echoes comprising the received signal return. Defining f in equation (30) in terms of equations (31) and (32), the following equation (34) results: 〈  (z) 〉 = 2π(f (o) - 4σ²∫β (z) dz) - 2πν + 〈  r 〉 (34) Since distance z depends on time t , z can be replaced with t in equation (34) and if both sides are differentiated with respect to time, equation (35) results: ∂ ∂t 〈  〉 = 4πσ²Cβ (t) + ∂ ∂t 〈  r 〉 (35) Therefore, if ∂ / ∂t〈 ˙ r 〉 can be reduced to zero for the short time period T , then the attenuation slope coefficient β can be determined from equation (35). In a manner similar to that used by the prior art in the frequency domain, ∂ / ∂t〈 ˙ r 〉 could be reduced by averaging around a point of interest. However, this reduces the spatial resolution and requires a large amount of processing, thereby making real-time operation difficult. An apparatus according to one of the third through fifth embodiments of the present invention uses "centroid averaging" in real time to eliminate ∂ / ∂t〈 ˙ r 〉 without spatial averaging, thereby assuring high spatial resolution and high accuracy using low-cost, simple circuitry having easy operation. The received signal is a convolution of a desired pulse waveform and a random signal described above. Thus, the random phase  r is included in, e.g. the output from quadrature detectors 14-1 to 14-m (Fig.10) which process the received signal. The random phase  r varies with the center frequency f r . Thus, by averaging signal characteristics for several frequency bands of the received signal, each having a different center frequency (f r ) i , ∂ / ∂t〈 ˙ r 〉 will be reduced and the attenuation slope coefficient β can be obtained. If the standard deviations σ i for each of the received signal bands are the same, equation (35) becomes: ∂ ∂t 〈  〉 = 4πσ²Cβ (t) (36) The signal characteristic which is averaged can be any of the quantities such as , f and β which were derived from the outputs of the single quadrature detector 14 in the first and second embodiments. In the third embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in Fig.10, m filters 17-1 to 17-m distribute the received signal into m received signal bands and then m corresponding quadrature detectors 14-1 to 14-m generate in-phase and quadrature components for each of the received signal bands. Prior to averaging in an averaging circuit 18, m signal conversion circuits 7-1 to 7-m generate the phase difference  by one of the methods described in the first two embodiments. The output of the averaging circuit 18 is the average phase difference 〈〉, and differentiating circuits 8 and 10 output 〈 ˙〉 and β, respectively. As a test of the effectiveness of the present invention, the embodiment illustrated in Fig.10 was used on a rabbit liver about 2 cm thick. A 4.0 MHz disc transducer with a bandwidth of almost 1 MHz supplied the transmitted signal and the received signal was distributed by 11 filters each having a bandwidth of 0.66 MHz and center frequencies separated by 0.1 MHz. The signal conversion circuits 7-1 to 7-11 used an arctangent calculator which included an unwrapping algorithm . The averaging circuit 18 provided an arithmetic average 〈〉 of the phase difference  and the differentiating circuit 10 included dividing the result of the differentiation by 4πσ²C and thus output the attenuation slope coefficient β. The output of the signal conversion circuits 7-1 to 7-11 and the averaging circuit 18 are illustrated in Fig.11 with "mean" referring to the average phase difference 〈〉 output by the averaging circuit 18. From Fig.11, it is clear that the random phase component of 〈〉 is remarkably reduced. A fourth embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in Fig.12 in which 〈 ˙〉 is calculated using equation (28) which was derived from the autocorrelation function. The signal conversion circuits 7-1 to 7-m , averaging circuit 18 and first differentiating circuit 8 are replaced with first calculation circuits 19-1 to 19-m₁ which calculate (Q ˙I - QI ˙), second calculation circuits 20-1 to 20-m₁ which calculate (I² + Q²), first and second summation circuits 182 and 184 which sum the output of the first 19-i and second 20-i calculation circuits, respectively, and a divider circuit 186. The remaining blocks in Fig.12 contain the same components as in Fig.10. The number of received signal bands in Fig.12 is indicated as m₁ because in the third embodiment, illustrated in Fig.10, m filters provide m meaningful values which can be averaged for a specific depth z . However, in the fourth embodiment, illustrated in Fig.12, as z increases, the center frequency f r and thus 〈 ˙〉 decrease as indicated by equation (32). Additional received signal bands must be supplied to cover the decrease in the center frequency f r and m₁ is therefore larger than m . The summation circuits 182 and 184 and divider circuit 186 average  ˙ and remove the random signal  ˙ r by taking a weighted average using the moment M₀ = (I² + Q²) since some of the received signal bands will have minimal power. The weighted average 〈 ˙ w 〉 is given by equations (36) and (37). Thus, the first calculation circuits 19-1 to 19-m₁ and summation circuit 182 provide the numerator of equation (37-2) and the second calculation circuits 20-1 to 20-m₁ and the second summation circuit 184 provide the denominator of equation (37-2), while the divider 186 outputs 〈 ˙ w 〉. When the output of the divider 186 is differentiated with respect to time and divided by the appropriate constant in the differentiation circuit 10, the attenuation slope coefficient β is obtained. The fourth embodiment avoids the calculation of the phase difference and the use of a phase unwrapping algorithm, thus simplifying the circuitry used in each of the components. However, since additional received signal frequency bands are required, a larger number of each of the components are needed. In the second embodiment, feedback control was implemented to eliminate the need for phase unwrapping. Similarly, in a fifth embodiment, illustrated in Fig.13, feedback control is used to reduce the number of received signal bands needed to cover the decrease in 〈 ˙〉 for increases in z . In Fig.13, the number of received signal bands is indicated as 5 to simplify the illustration, but in an actual device the number of bands would be m to provide the same resolution as the third embodiment. Distribution of the received signal is accomplished in the fifth embodiment by quadrature detectors 14'-1 to 14'-5, each of which receives a reference signal having a different frequency. The output of each of the quadrature detectors 14'-i passes through low-pass filters 21-1 to 21-5 which correspond to the low-pass filters 5 and 6 in Fig.2. Calculation of 〈 ˙〉 is completed by the divider 186, as in the fourth embodiment, and then a difference amplifier 22 compares the output of the divider 186 with zero and outputs the difference. The output of the difference amplifier 22 is supplied to the differentiation circuit 10, as in the third and fourth embodiments, and is also supplied to a voltage-to-frequency converter 15' which generates the reference signals for the quadrature detectors 14'-1 to 14'-5. As a result, the frequency band covered by the quadrature detectors 14'-1 to 14'-5 changes to follow the decrease in 〈 ˙〉 and the same number of received signal bands may be used in the fifth embodiment as are used in the third embodiment. The operation of the fifth embodiment is illustrated in Fig.14(A) through Fig.14(C). The average frequency f and the reference frequency ν + iε (where i is an integer) for one of the quadrature detectors 14'-1 to 14'-5 are illustrated in Fig.14(A). The received signal band corresponding to the illustrated quadrature detector 14'-i is illustrated as a dotted line, while the received signal is illustrated as a solid line. The output of the quadrature detector 14'-i includes high and low spectra as illustrated in Fig.14(B). The high spectrum has the same profile as the received signal but has a higher center frequency, f +ν+iε, and the low spectrum is folded about the f = 0 axis. The output waveform of the low-pass filter 21-i connected to the quadrature detector 14'-i is illustrated in Fig.14(C). By using low-pass filters 21-1 to 21-5 with a high end cut-off frequency which is one-half the bandwidth of the filters 17-1 to 17-m or 17-m₁ of Figs. 10 and 12, the output signals of m low-pass filters 21-1 to 21-m will have the same range as the quadrature detectors 14-1 to 14-m in the third embodiment. The calculation of 〈 ˙〉 is performed in a manner similar to that in the fourth embodiment, e.g., the outputs of the first calculation circuits 19-1 to 19-5 are as follows: [2π f +₂ - 2π(ν+ 2ε) + 〈  r,+2 〉] (I+₂² + Q+₂²) (38-1) [2π f +₁ - 2π(ν+ε) + 〈  r,+1 〉] (I+₁² + Q+₁²) (38-2) [2π f ₀ - 2πν + 〈  r,0 〉] (I₀² + Q₀²) (38-3) [2π f ₋₁ - 2π(ν-ε) + 〈  r,-1 〉] (I₋₁² + Q₋₁²) (38-4) [2π f ₋₂ - 2π(ν + 2ε) + 〈  r,-2 〉] (I₋₂² + Q₋₂²) (38-5) where f i is a center frequency and 〈 ˙ r,i 〉 is a random instant instantaneous frequency in the ith received signal band. The sum tends to zero as the number of received signal bands m increases, while the weighted average of ( f r ) i tends to f z . Therefore, the output of the divider circuit 186 is proportional to the value given by equation (39). 2π f z - 2πν + 0 (39) The quantity in equation (39) is compared by the difference amplifier 22 which produces an output used by the differentiation circuit 10 and the voltage-to-frequency converter 15'. With a sufficiently high gain, the voltage-to-frequency converter 15' can supply reference signals to the quadrature detectors 14'-1 to 14'-5 to keep the output of the difference amplifier 22 almost exactly proportional to f z . Many modifications of the fourth and fifth embodiments are possible. For example, Japanese Patent Application 58-142893 provides detail on the use of the autocorrelation function to calculate higher moments of the power spectrum, the variance σ² and other signal charcteristics in the time domain which can be used for correcting the effect of frequency dependent reflection and to provide accurate tissue characteristics. These tissue characteristics can be derived from the statistical values generated by the calculation circuits 19-i, 20-i, 182, 184 and 186. As one example, the variance σ² is a good measure of the randomness of the tissue and can be used for medical diagnosis. As another example, the attenuation can be obtained as a function of depth z in the time domain from the attenuation slope coefficient β. The attenuation can be used for precise time-gain control to provide the reflection coefficient quantitatively for reflection coefficient imaging. This also leads to the measurement of frequency dependent reflection by a parameter such as the exponent of the frequency in the time domain. An embodiment of the present invention includes an apparatus for supplying values such as , Δf, f , β, σ², etc. to a CRT display 13 illustrated in Figs.2 and 9. By varying the scan line, a tomographic image of an object to be measured can be displayed and the above values can be simultaneously displayed using e.g., B-mode, M-mode, or Doppler images. For example, in Figs.2 and 9, , Δf, f and β are supplied to the display controller 12 as brightness signals. These signals are then supplied to the CRT 13 together with the pertinent synchronous signal, blanking signal and deflection signal related to the ultrasonic scanning of the object to be measured. According to this invention, as explained above, the frequency shift Δf of a reflected ultrasonic wave passing through a measuring medium and the attenuation slope coefficient β of the ultrasonic wave in the measuring medium can be obtained on a real-time basis using a simple, low-cost circuit which is easy to use, in place of a relatively expensive and low speed device which obtains a power spectrum of the received signal. In addition, errors caused by pulse overlapping (spectrum scalloping) can be removed in the time domain, while maintaining high spatial resolution and real-time operation. The present invention relates to an apparatus which determines the distribution of the attenuation slope coefficient on a real-time basis using the center frequency shift. In one embodiment, the phase difference between a received signal and a reference signal is determined using EXCLUSIVE OR gates or an inverse trigonometric relation stored in a ROM. The phase difference is input to a differentiator which outputs the center frequency shift of the received signal on a real-time basis. The center frequency shift is input to another differentiator which outputs the attenuation slope coefficient. In other embodiments, the received signal is distributed into received signal bands, having different center frequencies, and signal characteristics of the received signal bands are averaged to remove virtually all effects of spectrum scalloping in the time domain. Thus, the attenuation slope coefficient is obtained without the effects of spectrum scalloping using simple hardware and without Fourier transformation The present invention provides apparatus for detecting a characteristic of an ultrasonic wave medium using an ultrasonic wave transmitted into the medium and received as a received signal after reflection in the medium, comprising means for supplying at least one reference signal, and means, operable on a real-time basis and on the basis of time-domain calculations only, to determine a phase difference between the received signal and such a reference signal, or an average phase difference determined in dependence upon portions of the received signal in a plurality of signal bands, and/or to determine a first derivative with respect to time (or distance into the medium) of such phase difference, or an average such first derivative determined in dependence upon the said portions of the received signal.

Claims: An apparatus for measuring the ultrasonic wave attenuation of a medium using an ultrasonic wave pulse transmitted into the medium and received as a received signal after reflection from different depths within this medium, characterised by: means (15) for supplying a reference signal; means (2 to 7; 60 to 65), operatively connected to said reference signal supplying means (15) and operatively connected to receive the received signal, for determining a phase difference () between the received signal and the reference signal (ν; REF0, REF1); first differentiating means (8), operatively connected to said phase difference determining means (2 to 7; 60 to 65), for differentiating the phase difference () with respect to time to generate a frequency shift amount signal (2π(fr-fo)); and second differentiating means (10), operatively connected to said first differentiating means (8), for differentiating the frequency shift amount signal with respect to time to generate an attenuation slope coefficient (β). An apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein said phase difference determining means (2 to 7) comprises: a quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6), operatively connected to said reference signal supplying means (15) and operatively connect to receive the received signal, for separating the received signal into an in-phase component (I) and a quadrature component (Q); and a signal conversion circuit (7), operatively connected to said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6) and said first differentiating means (8), for determining the phase difference based on an inverse trigonometric function using the in-phase component (I) and the quadrature component (Q) of the received signal. An apparatus as recited in claim 2, wherein said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6) comprises: a 90° phase shifter circuit (2), operatively connected to said reference signal supplying means (15), for shifting the reference signal (ν) by 90 ° ; a first multiplier circuit (3) operatively connected to said 90° phase shifter circuit (2) and operatively connected to receive the received signal; a second multiplier circuit (4) operatively connected to said reference signal supplying means (15) and operatively connected to receive the received signal; a first low-pass filter (5), operatively connected to said first multiplier circuit (3) and said signal conversion circuit (7), for outputting the in-phase component (I) of the received signal; and a second low-pass filer (6), operatively connected to said second multiplier circuit (4) and said signal conversion circuit (7), for outputting the quadrature component (Q) of the received signal. An apparatus as recited in claim 2 or 3, wherein said signal conversion circuit comprises: a first analog/digital converter (71), operatively connected to said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6), for converting the in-phase component (I) of the received signal into a digital in-phase component; a second analog/digital converter (72), operatively connected to said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6), for converting the quadrature component (Q) of the received signal into a digital quadrature component; a read only memory (73), operatively connected to said first (71) and second (72) analog/digital converters, for determining a digital phase difference as the arctangent of a quantity defined by the digital quadrature component divided by the digital in-phase component; and a digital/analog converter (74), operatively connected to said read only memory (73) and said first differentiating means (8), for outputting the phase difference by converting the digital phase difference into an analog signal. An apparatus as recited in claim 2 or 3, wherein said signal conversion circuit comprises: a divider circuit (75), operatively connected to said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6), for dividing the quadrature component (Q) of the received signal by the in-phase component (I) of the received signal and generating a divided output; a first comparator (76), operatively connected to said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 7), for outputting the sign of the in-phase component (I) of the received signal; a second comparator (78), operatively connected to said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6), for outputting the sign of the quadrature component (Q) of the received signal; an analog/digital converter (77), operatively connected to said divider circuit (75), for converting the divided output into a digital divided output; a read only memory (73), operatively connected to said first (76) and second (78) comparators, and said analog/digital converter (77), for determining the arctangent of the digital divided output in a quadrant identified by the sign of the in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components of the received signal; and a digital/analog converter (74), operatively connected to said read only memory (73) and said first differentiating means (8), for outputting the phase difference by converting the arctangent of the digital divided output into an analog signal. An apparatus as recited in claim 2 or 3, wherein said signal conversion circuit comprises: a first multiplier (81), operatively connected to said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6), for squaring the in-phase component (I) of the received signal; a second multiplier (82), operatively connected to said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6), for squaring the quadrature component (Q) of the received signal; a first comparator (76), operatively connected to ground and to said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6), for outputting the sign of the in-phase component (I) of the received signal; a second comparator (78), operatively connected to ground and to said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6), for outputting the sign of the quadrature component (Q) of the received signal; an adder (83), operatively connected to said first (81) and second (82) multipliers, for summing the squares of the in-phase and quadrature components of the received signal; a square root generating circuit (84), operatively connected to said adder (83), for generating the square root of the sum of the squares of the in-phase and quadrature components of the received signal; a divider (75), operatively connected to said square root generating circuit (84) and said quadrature detector circuit (2 to 6), for generating a divided output corresponding to the in-phase component (I) of the received signal divided by the square root of the sum of the squares of the in-phase (I) and quadrature components (Q) of the received signal; an analog/digital converter (77), operatively connected to said divider (75), for converting the divided output into a digital divided output; a read only memory (738), operatively connected to said first (76) and second (78) comparators and said analog/digital converter (77), for determining the arccosine of the digital divided output; and a digital/analog converter (74), operatively connected to said read only memory (738) and said first differentiating means (8), for outputting the phase difference by converting the arccosine of the digital divided output into an analog signal. An apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the reference signal (ν) has a period and wherein said phase difference determining means comprises: waveform converting means (60), operatively connected to receive the received signal, for converting the received signal into an input signal (INPUT) representing the sign of the received signal; mean value generating means (61 to 64), operatively connected to said waveform converting means (60) and said reference signal supplying means, for generating a mean value signal representing an amount of time that the input signal and reference signal are opposite in sign divided by the period of the reference signal; and saw-tooth phase means (65), operatively connected to said mean value means (61 to 64) and said first differentiating means (8), for comparing the mean value signal with a saw-tooth phase characteristic to determine the phase difference. An apparatus as recited in claim 7, wherein said reference signal supplying means supplies first (REF0) and second (REF1) square wave reference signals, the second square wave reference signal being 90° out of phase with the first square wave reference signal, and wherein said mean value generating means (61 to 64) comprises: a first EXCLUSIVE OR gate (61), operatively connected to said waveform converting means, and said reference signal supplying means, for EXCLUSIVE ORing the input signal (INPUT) and the first square wave reference signal (REF0); a second EXCLUSIVE OR gate (62), operatively connected to said waveform converting means, and said reference signal supplying means, for EXCLUSIVE ORing the input signal (INPUT) and the second square wave reference signal (REF1); a first low pass filter (63) operatively connected to said first EXCLUSIVE OR gate (61) and said saw-tooth phase means (65); and a second low pass filter (64) operatively connected to said second EXCLUSIVE OR gate (62) and said saw-tooth phase means (65). An apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein said phase difference determining means comprises: means, operatively connected to receive said received signal, for sampling the received signal at a rate considerably higher than the frequency of the received signal; means, operatively connected to said sampling means, for storing the samples of the received signal; and digital processing means, operatively connected to said storing means, said reference signal supplying means and said first differentiating means, for obtaining the phase difference using digital processing. An apparatus as recited in claim 9, wherein said digital processing means comprises: component means, operatively connected to said storing means and said reference signal supplying means , for distributing the received signal into an in-phase component which is in phase with the reference signal and a quadrature component which is orthogonal to the in-phase component; and trigonometric relation means, operatively connected to said component means and said first differentiating means, for determining the phase difference from a trigonometric relation between the in-phase and quadrature components of the received signal. An apparatus as recited in claim 10, wherein said trigonometric relation means comprises means, operatively connected to said component generating means and said first differentiating means, for calculating the arctangent of a quantity defined by the quadrature component divided by the in-phase component. An apparatus as recited in claim 10, wherein said trigonometric relation means comprises means, operatively connected to said component generating means and said first differentiating means, for calculating the arccosine of a quantity defined by the in-phase component divided by the square root of the sum of the squares of the in-phase and quadrature components. An apparatus as recited in any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the reference signal supplied by said reference signal supplying means (15) has a variable frequency, and further comprising a level adjusting circuit (16), operatively connected to said phase difference determining means (2 to 7; 60 to 65) and said reference signal supplying means (15), for varying the frequency of the reference signal (ν; REF0, REF1) in accordance with the phase difference (). An apparatus as recited in any one of claims 1 to 13, further comprising means, operatively connected to at least one among said phase difference determining means (2 to 7; 60 to 65) and said first (8) and second (10) differentiating means, for displaying at least one among the phase difference (), frequency shift amount signal (2π(fr-fo), and attenuation slope coefficient (β) corresponding to the different depths from which the ultrasonic wave pulse was reflected. A method for measuring the ultrasonic wave attenuation of an object, comprising the steps of: (a) sending an ultrasonic wave pulse toward an object the attenuation of which is to be measured; (b) receiving a received signal comprised of ultrasonic waves reflected from different depths within this object; characterised by: (c) generating a reference signal (ν; REF0, REF1); (d) determining a phase difference () between the received signal and the reference signal; (e) differentiating the phase difference with respect to time to generate a frequency shift amount (2π(fr-fo)); and (f) differentiating the frequency shift amount with respect to time to generate an attenuation slope coefficient (β). A method as recited in claim 15, wherein step (d) comprises the substeps of: (di) separating the received signal into an in-phase component (I) and a quadrature component (Q); and (dii) calculating a value for an inverse trigonometric function using the in-phase and quadrature components of the received signal to determine the phase difference (). A method as recited in claim 15, wherein the reference signal generated in step (c) includes first (REF0) and second (REF1) square wave reference signals which have a period which is the same for both the first and second square wave reference signals, the second square wave reference signal being 90° out of phase with the first square wave reference signal, wherein step (d) comprises the substeps of: (di) converting the received signal into an input square wave signal (INPUT); (dii) calculating first and second mean values which are equal to the amount of time the first (REF0) and second (REF1) square wave reference signals, respectively, have the same sign as the input square wave signal (INPUT) divided by the period of the first and second square wave signals; and (diii) comparing the first and second mean values with a saw-tooth phase characteristic to determine the phase difference (). An apparatus for measuring the ultrasonic wave attenuation of a medium using an ultrasonic wave pulse transmitted into the medium and received as a received signal after reflection from different depths within this medium, comprising: signal distributing means (17-1 to 17-m; 14-1 to 14-5, 21-1 to 21-5), operatively connected to receive the received signal, for distributing the received signal into at least three signal channels corresponding to respective frequency bands, and characterised by means (15') for supplying a reference signal (ν; ν+2ε to ν-2ε) for each of the signal channels, calculation and averaging means (14-1 to 14-m, 7-1 to 7-1, 18, 8; 19-1 to 19-m1, 20-1 to 20-m1, 182, 184, 186; 19-1 to 19-5, 20-1 to 20-5, 182, 184, 186, 22) connected to receive signals derived from each of said signal channels and operable to determine an average differential with respect to time (〈 ˙〉) of phase difference between the distributed signal and the reference signal in each of the said channels, and differentiating means (10), operatively connected to the calculation and averaging means, for differentiating with respect to time the average differential (〈 ˙〉) provided by the calculation and averaging means, to generate an attenuation slope coefficient (β). An apparatus as claimed in claim 18, wherein said signal distributing means comprises filters (17-1 to 17-m), one for each signal channel, operatively connected to receive the received signal and connected to the calculation and averaging means (14-1 to 14-m, 7-1 to 7-m, 18, 8). An apparatus as claimed in claim 19, wherein the received signal has a received bandwidth, wherein each of the filters (17-1 to 17-m) has a centre frequency , wherein the centre frequency of each of the filters is different and wherein each of the filters has a bandwidth narrower than the received bandwidth. An apparatus as claimed in claim 20, wherein the bandwidths of the filters (17-1 to 17-m) are substantially identical. An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 19 to 21, wherein the calculation and averaging means comprise phase difference determining means having: quadrature detector circuits (14-1 to 14-m), operatively connected to respective said filters (17-1 to 17-m) and to the reference signal supplying means, for separating the distributed received signal into in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components in each of the signal channels, and signal conversion circuits (7-1 to 7-m), operatively connected to respective said quadrature detectors, for determining for each of the signal channels a phase difference () between the distributed signal and the reference signal in the signal channel, using an inverse trigonometric function of the in-phase component (I) and the quadrature component (Q) of the distributed received signal in the signal channel concerned. An apparatus as claimed in claim 22, wherein the phase difference determining means further comprise an averaging circuit (18), operatively connected to the signal conversion circuits (7-1 to 7-m) to derive the average phase difference (〈〉). An apparatus as claimed in claim 23, wherein the calculation and averaging means further comprise a differentiating circuit (8) operatively connected to the averaging circuit (18) for differentiating the average phase difference with respect to time, to generate said average differential with respect to time of phase difference. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 19 to 21, wherein the calculation and averaging means comprise: quadrature detector circuits, operatively connected to respective said filters and to the reference signal supplying means, for separating the distributed received signal into in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components in each of the signal channels, first calculation circuits (19-1 to 19-m1), operatively connected to respective said quadrature detectors, for calculating Q ˙I - QI ˙ in respect of each of the signal channels, I ˙ and Q ˙ being the time derivatives of the respective (I) and (Q) components, second calculation circuits (20-1 to 20-m1), operatively connected to respective said quadrature detectors, for calculating I² + Q² in respect of each of the signal channels, a first summation circuit (182), operatively connected to the first calculation circuits, for providing the sum of the quantities Q ˙I - QI ˙ from the first calculation circuits, a second summation circuit (184), operatively connected to the second calculation circuits, for providing the sum of the quantities I² + Q² from the second calculation circuits, and a divider circuit (186), operatively connected to the first and second summation circuits, for dividing the sum provided by the first summation circuit by the sum provided by the second summation circuit, to provide said average differential of phase difference as an output. An apparatus as claimed in claim 18, wherein the signal distributing means comprise: quadrature detectors (14'-1 to 14'-5) each operatively connected to receive the received signal and connected to the reference signal supplying means (15') which is operable to supply each quadrature detector with a reference signal of a different frequency (ν+2ε to ν-2ε), for separating the distributed received signal into in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components, and low-pass filters (21-1 to 21-5) operatively connected to respective said quadrature detectors for filtering the in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components, and wherein the calculation and averaging means comprise: first calculation circuits (19-1 to 19-5), operatively connected, via said low-pass filters, to respective said quadrature detectors, for calculating Q ˙I - QI ˙ in respect of each of the signal channels, I ˙ and Q ˙ being the time derivatives of the respective (I) and (Q) components second calculation circuits (20-1 to 20-m1), operatively connected, via said low pass filters, to respective said quadrature detectors, for calculating I² + Q² in respect of each of the signal channels, a first summation circuit (182), operatively connected to the first calculation circuits, for providing the sum of the quantities Q ˙I - QI ˙ from the first calculation circuits, a second summation circuit (184), operatively connected to the second calculation circuits, for providing the sum of the quantities I² + Q² from the second calculation circuits, and a divider circuit (186), operatively connected to the first and second summation circuits, for dividing the sum provided by the first summation circuit by the sum provided by the second summation circuit, to provide said average differential of phase difference as an output, and wherein the reference signal supplying means (15') are operable to vary the frequencies (ν+2ε to ν-2ε) of the reference signals supplied to the quadrature detectors (14'-1 to 14'-5) in accordance with said output. A method of measuring the ultrasonic wave attenuation of a medium using an ultrasonic wave pulse transmitted into the medium and received as a received signal after reflection from different depths within this medium, comprising: distributing (17-1 to 17-m; 14-1 to 14-5, 21-1 to 21-5), the received signal into at least three signal channels corresponding to respective frequency bands, and characterised by supplying (15') a reference signal (ν; ν+2ε to ν-2ε) for each of the signal channels, determining (14-1 to 14-m, 7-1 to 7-1, 18, 8; 19-1 to 19-m1, 20-1 to 20-m1, 182, 184, 186; 19-1 to 19-5, 20-1 to 20-5, 182, 184, 186, 22) for signals derived from each of said signal channels an average differential with respect to time (〈 ˙〉) of phase difference between the distributed signal and the reference signal in each of the said channels, and differentiating (10) with respect to time said average differential (〈 ˙〉) to generate an attenuation slope coefficient (β).

Inventors: KLEPPER, JOHN R., MIWA, HIROHIDE C/O FUJITSU LTD., PAT. DEPT., MURAKAMI, KEIICHI C/O FUJITSU LTD., PAT. DEPT., REID, JOHN M., SHIMURA, TAKAKI C/O FUJITSU LTD., PAT. DEPT.
Applicants: FUJITSU LIMITED
Application year: 1985
Main classification: G01S15
IPC codes: G01S15, G01S7