FIRE BARRIER PLYWOODS

Abstract: A fire resistant laminate resists flame spread and flame penetration therethrough. The laminate comprises (A) a solid, combustible lamina; and bonded to the lamina (A), a hard, thin, continuous layer (B) comprising an inorganic cementitious composition. Layer (B) is capable of maintaining its structural strength and dimensional stability with zero flame spread when exposed to a flame temperature of 2000<o>F for one hour. The inorganic cementitious composition in a fluid state is capable of adhesively bonding to wood and maintaining an adhesive bond to the wood after the fluid composition is dried to form the solid, thin layer. The inorganic cementitious composition consists essentially of (1) a mixture of two or more hydraulic setting or chemical setting inorganic cements, and (2) an activator. Each of the cements is capable of being set at a temperature to about 120<o>F within about 45 minutes by the activator. The resulting laminate has a fire retardant classification of Class I (or A).

Description: - 1 - DESCRIPTION FIRE BARRIER PLYWOODS This application is a continuation-in-part of application Serial No. 603,799, filed April 25, 1984, for FIRE BARRIER I. COATINGS, the entire disclo¬ sure of which is relied upon and incorporated herein by reference. Technical Field This invention relates to a fire barrier and more particularly to a fire resistant laminate for retarding flame spread and flame penetration. Background Art • Although natural wood as a material of construc¬ tion has many ' desirable properties, some of its short¬ comings, such as its lack of strength in thin layers, and its inherent combustibility, have restricted the scope of its application. The economic necessity of utilizing "waste" subproducts, and the notable product improvement in strength and appearance has led to the widespread use of laminated wood products in the form of plywood, wood panelling, and veneers, such as doorskin, as well as veneer-covered compressed particle and waferboard. Construction and industrial plywoods are widely used for floor, wall and roof sheathing; decorative hardwood plywood is used for interior panelling as well as for furniture and many specialty applications. The 1984 edition of "U.S. Industrial Outlook" reported that the market for wood panel products in 1983 reached $6.6 billion, of which the industrial softwood panels represented 657c of the shipments; hardwood panels represented 257>, and particleboard held 107. of the market. 2.60 Billion square feet (surface measure) of hardwood plywood was produced in the U.S.A. in 1983, versus 3.9 billion square feet in 1977 (a reduction of 337>) , while an additional 1.48 billion square feet were imported. (Softwood plywood volumes far exceed those of hardwood plywood; viz. over 20 billion square feet per year.) If one of the major drawbacks to the use of plywood -- its flammability -- could be economically counteracted without necessitating the use of clad¬ dings, fire resistive gypsum wallboard shielding, space isolation, etc. now required by construction codes, the market and applications for plywood would be further extended. Plywood and panelling is manufactured by bonding together layers (plies) . of thin sheets of wood (veneer). The layers are glued together . x^ith the grain direction of adjacent layers at right angles. The veneer is usually rotary-peeled from logs, but may also be sliced or sawn. After trimming, drying and grading, the veneers go to glue spreaders, where adhesive is applied and the plywood panel is laid up. The plywood is generally hot-pressed in large multiopening heated hydraulic presses. The application of both heat and pressure cures the glue. Construction and industrial softwood plyxrood is made in two types: Interior and exterior, on the basis of resistance of the panels to moisture, and in thicknesses ranging from 1/4" to 1 1/8". Decorative hardwood plywood is available in thicknesses from 1/8" to over 2". The standard size of a plywood sheet - 3 - is 4' x 8', but other sizes and thicknesses can be manufactured on special order. Typical plywoods are manufactured in 3 to 5 layers, but with 3 to 6 plies. Although weights will vary with the species of wood used, 5/16" thick unsanded panels weigh approximately 1.0 pound per square foot; 3/4" panels weigh 2.2 pounds per square foot, and 1" thick panels x^eigh 3.0 pounds per square foot. Hardwood plywood is gene¬ rally a decorative wall paneling product, but is also used structurally, for example, in the structural integrity of mobile and manufactured homes. Because of plywood's cross-laminate structure, it can support highly concentrated loads, even at unsupported edges . Shear strength varies with the kind of glue, used, even though the glue line is very thin -- a few mils thick (dry) . Several types of water-dispersable glues are used in plywood bonding, which Vary in their resistance to moisture and are. one of the bases used for grading as exterior or interior grade'. Most glues used are thermosetting, and these vary in the temperature, temperature-time, and temperature-time-pressure re¬ quired to "cure", as well as "pot-life", "open time", viscosity, "spreadability" and other parameters essen- tial for a suitable bonding agent. Softwood plywoods generally use phenolic adhesives (phenol-formaldehyde) ; decorative hardwood plywoods generally use urea formal¬ dehyde resins. The phenolic glues, which are highly water-resistant, will cure in 4 to 5 minutes at tempe- ratures as low as 300°F, but they have a short shelf life. The urea formaldehyde adhesives can be catalyzed with ammonium sulphate at 0.5 to 1.07, to bring about a lower temperature cure, and typically require from 150 to 300 psi pressure (depending on the density of the wood species being bonded) at 230° to 260°F for 3 to 5 minutes. Resorcinol and phenol-resorcinol resins are highly waterproof, and if properly catalyzed do not require heating for curing -- that is, they bond at room temperatures. Parafor aldehyde is a commonly used catalyst in bringing about the cross-linking reaction. However, in comparison to the phenolics and ureas, they are very expensive, and hence are not used in plywood or panelling lamination, but are used in laminating heavy timbers and beams X"Glulam") . Other widely used laminating adhesives are based on melamines (melamine formaldehyde, melamine urea, etc.), but these are used mainly in furniture decorative laminates, etc. Most of the glues used are flammable, although some are "self-extinguishing". They impart little fire resistance to the plywood. The fire hazard associated with the flammability of wood products is the principal limiting factor in the use of laminated woods as a material of cons¬ truction. Almost all local, state and regional govern¬ ing bodies have enacted building Codes which regulate the use of wood products in construction, and which dictate other norms for the prevention, early detec¬ tion, and extinguishment of fires. (Most "advanced" countries also have national building codes) . Some fire-preventive methods are "structural", i.e., isola- tion of the wood members behind fire barriers; others are "spatial" -- separating wood members by "fire breaks"; and still others require the use of sprinkler or water deluge system installations. "Chemical" methods are also available, although not as widely used. These fall into two major categories: (a) Impreg¬ nation with fire retardants; or (b) Coating with paints which retard the spread of flame. Both are effective for short periods of time in reducing flame spread, but neither is significantly effective in increasing the resistance of wood to degradation under sustained fire exposure, or in preventing reduc- tion of its load-bearing capacity. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) has established a Standard (#703-1979) for both "Fire Retardant Impregnated Wood" and "Fire ' Retardant Coat¬ ings for Building Materials." The American Wood Pre- servers Association has a Standard (AWPA C-27) with a requirement for a flamespread of 25 or less, with no evidence of significant progressive combustion when tested for 30 minutes duration under the ASTM E-84 Test Method. "Fire Retardant Treatment of Lumber and Plywood" is also covered by Federal Specification MIL-L-19140 D (Navy). U.S. Federal Specification SS-A-118(b) covers the use of flame retardant coatings on unfinished interior plywood and other construction products . Impregnation with fire retardant chemicals is an expensive procedure and a complicated process, since, in order, to be effective, the chemicals must be applied under pressure in a closed pressure cylinder which requires that a vacuum be pulled first on the load to extract the air from the wood cells prior to pressurization. Chemicals commonly used in this impregnation are water-soluble sulphate, borax, boric acid, zinc chloride, sodium dichromate and combinations thereof. Some of the salts are corrosive to metal fasteners and hardware (nails, screws, bolts, hinges, etc.); some prevent surface painting; some species of wood must be scored to ensure penetration of the treating solution; and being water-soluble, the salts tend to leach out if exposed to weather. American Plywood Association (APA) mandates that allowable stresses be reduced l/6th, and the modules of elasti¬ city be reduced 1/lOth for fire-retardant chemical pressure-impregnated plywood below normal design standards for untreated plywood. In addition, the fire retardant treatment of wood does not prevent the wood from decomposing and charring under fire exposure. The rate of fire penetration through treated wood is approximately the same as for untreated wood. Fire retardant coatings are also used to reduce the surface flammability of wood and laminated wood products. Prior art disclosed four major types of fire-protective paints: (1) Ablative; (2) intumescent; (3) sublimating and gas- or vapor-producing; and (4) "ceramic" or inorganic. Ablative coatings are generally thick and heavy and costly, thus limiting their application to special uses. Intumescent coatings are generally soft and easily abraded, and have limited duration of protection -- 10 to 15 minutes -- when exposed to fire before the delicate char cracks and is eroded away, leaving the substrate unprotected. They cannot be used internally ("submerged") between the wood plies since their mode of action is inhibited by the glue line bond strength. The adhesive prevents their normal 10 times (or greater) expansion. Sublima- tive or gas-producing coatings have even shorter duration of protection -- after their snuffing gases - 7 - have been produced and wafted away, they are left without a protective mechanism. They have found their major use in the treatment of fibers and clothing where only short-term exposure to flame is a major requirement. Ceramic coatings, as the name implies, require high temperature curing in order to form the ceramic bond, which many structural and building wood components cannot withstand. Inorganic coatings, such as Portland Cement, gypsum, calcium aluminate cement, phosphate-bonded cements, silicate coatings, high temperature silicones, and magnesium "oxychloride" and magnesium "oxysulphate" cement coatings have all been proposed. H. Ellis, in a companion U.S. Letters Patent application, now pending, entitled "FIRE BARRIER: I. COATINGS", of which this disclosure is an extension, in part, discloses seven type formulations for inor¬ ganic coatings, consisting of synergistic combinations of two and three non-combustible inorganic bonding systems which efficiently prevent flame spread on the surface of susceptible substrates, and at the same time prevent flame from penetrating through the substrate. The American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) has issued a series of Standard Test Methods for evaluating the protective abilities of fire retard¬ ant coatings and constructions (E-119, "Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials"; D-3806, "Small Scale Evaluation of Fire Retardant Paints (2-Foot Tunnel Method)"; E-286, "Surface Flammability of Building Materials Using an 8-Foot Tunnel Furnace") . E-84, a 25-foot "Tunnel" test (the most widely accepted test), has its counterpart in Underwriters' Labora¬ tories (UL) #723; and the National Fire Protection 86/01195 -._---,„ ~ PCT/US85/01499 - 8 - Association (NFPA) #25 test methods. The tests deter¬ mine the protection a coating affords its substrate; and the comparative burning characteristics of coatings by evaluating flame spread over the surface xhen ignited under controlled laboratory conditions. The different tests are not comparable, although the results are correlatable. None of them describe or apprise the fire hazard of assemblies under actual fire conditions, but the results are usable as an element in fire-risk assessment. The tests also give the basis for classifying the performance of the coatings based on their Flame Spread Index Values into Class A (or I) , Class B (or II) and Class C (or III) , used by most Building Codes. Index value classification depends on flame spread of the candidate fire retardant coated products or materials of construction, in comparison to known standards. Asbestos-cement board is arbitrarily rated at 0 flame spread; Red Oak lumber is rated at 100. Materials with the lowest rate of flame spread (0-25) are classified as Class I, and are permitted in areas xtfhere fire hazard is most severe (such as exitways or unsprinklered buildings) ; materials xith rates from 26 to 75 are Class II, and are permitted in areas of intermediate severity; materials rated 76 to 200 (such as PS-1 uncoated construction plywood) are Class III, and are permitted in most rooms xvhen suitably protected by other design factors. Hospitals, institutions and buildings of public gatherings require Class I products or fire-protective barriers . There is also a Class D (or IV) , with Index Values of from 201 to 500, and a Class E (or V), with Index Values of over 500. - 9 - Most untreated softwood plywoods and decorative hardwood plywoods fall into Class III, but this varies, depending on x^ood species, thickness, and glue type. These types of plywood constitute by far the great majority of laminated wood boards. Therefore, they are accepted for interior finish only, and not for exitways. If they could be upgraded to Class I economi¬ cally, the range of their potential application would be extended considerably. The market for these products tfould also be considerably enlarged by the resulting savings in associated construction costs. In evaluating fire safety of laminated x^ood structures, two types of fire propagation must be considered: Flame spread and fire resistance. Flame spread -- a measurement of the maximum extension of the flame on a sample -- is a property of' the surface material once fire has started, not of the structure. (Under test conditions, it is a ratio, not inches, versus the arbitrary standards). Flame spread is an indication of how fast fire can extend over a room's surface, but says little about the third dimension of fire spread, i.e. the depth of fire penetration through the substrate. Most of the fire retardant coatings influence only the flame spread rate, that is, they function, to lower the lateral extension of the flaming surface per unit of time, but have little influence on the "Burn-Through Rate", since the coatings are a surface application. One exception to this statement is the disclosure in the Ellis patent application referred to above, in which the surface coating prevents the ignition of the substrate so that a carbonized insulative char forms under the coating -- pyrolysis without flame -- and in an area restricted to the immediate zone of the initial fire. Fire Endurance (or Resistance) is "The resistance against fire penetrating a wall, floor or roof, either directly or through a high rate of heat transfer that might cause combustible materials to be ignited on the 'cold' side of the wall away from the actual fire." In short, it indicates the ability to resist "burn-through" and measures the containment of the fire within a room or building. The standard test for measuring fire resistance is ASTM E-119; and resistance rating is expressed in the hours or the minutes that the construction withstands the test. The disclosure presented herein defines a novel method for increasing significantly the "fire endur¬ ance" of laminated wooden structures, and for decreas¬ ing significantly (if not completely preventing) flame spread in these laminated structures by inter¬ posing a non-flammable high temperature resistant coating, in a variety of arrangements, between the plies of the laminate, and, optionally, on the surface of the "plywood." Disclosure of Invention The prime objective of this • invention is to impart to the various types of laminated wood products generally termed "plywoods", which term includes panelling, doorskin, 'and other structures composed of multi-layered veneers, sufficient fire retardancy so that by themselves, without the need of other structural barriers, they form a fire barrier to both surface flame spread and burn-through (fire endurance), in short, develop a fire-barrier plywood which meets the requirements for a Class I (or A) fire retardancy classification, and thus permit the use of these materials in those situations now barred to their use by fire hazards or construction code restraints. By obviating the necessity of using supple¬ mental fire barriers, such as claddings, gypsum wall- board, and other structual alternatives, the use of fire barrier plywoods could lower construction costs, simplify design, decrease weight, add usable space to a structure, and lower insurance rates. Another objective is to overcome the deficiencies of the currently-used alternative systems for imparting fire retardancy to plywoods viz. pressure-impregnating the entire mass of the wood with fire retardant salts and resins, or surface coating alone with fire retard¬ ant paints and mastics. The use of pressure-impregnated salts is costly, more than doubling the price of untreated plywood; reduces the allowable stress limits by • 167α and modulus of elasticity by 107.; may be corro- sive to metals, and is x^ater-leachable, thus restrict¬ ing their outdoor use. Surface coatings are effective for only limited periods of time when exposed to fire; are usually soft and easily abradable; are usually applied on site after the installation, hence only cover the exposed, easily reached areas; and are effective mainly against surface flame spread for limited periods of time. Their efficiency in preventing burn-through is highly variable, and of relatively short duration. Still another objective is to develop a fire, barrier coating v-hich is relatively inexpensive, simple to apply, and which requires little modification of the procedures or equipment presently used in the manufacture of plyxv-ood. Another objective is to develop a fire barrier coating which in itself has sufficient adhesion to the various woods used in plywood construction to substitute for the currently used bonding glues, and/or be compatible with those glues, so that they may be applied together utilizing existing equipment. Still other objectives will become evident as the teachings of this invention are disclosed. Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention Ellis, in his companion U.S. application entitled "FIRE BARRIER: I. COATINGS" describes a series of tests (Table II, p. 1 - p. 3 and q. 1) in which a non-combustible inorganic coating was applied between txv-o pieces of 3-ply laminated plyxvOod, and between tx-o and four plies of doorskin, using the coating as the bonding agent (adhesive) for the layups. Results x?ere "unexpected, and highly successful. Surface flame spread, even on uncoated surfaces, x/as limited to little more than the contact area of the flame source, xi/hen exposed to a direct 1950°F propane torch flame, or subjected to the Standard ASTM-D-3806, 2-foot Tunnel test; "burn-through" x?as prevented, and the flame did not extend to a depth greater than the level of the nearest layer of internal "submerged" coating. In addition to markedly increasing the "fire resistance" of the panels, the "submerged" coating layer was found to influence and limit the surface flame spread. The closer the "submerged" layer was to the surface, the smaller the extent of flame spread. The coating served as an excellent adhesive between the wood plies, and the bond did not delaminate under the heat from either the propane torch or the gas flame (approximately 1900° to 2050°F) . Additionally, the coating can be tinted to match the color of the v7θθd plies, so that the "glue line" is not apparent. This invention extends the referenced Ellis disclosure and broadens its applicability. The results from a specific type coating formulation have been expanded into a general model for a fire barrier system for plywood and other laminated xtfood products, applicable to most types of non-combustible coatings. The general description of the invention is applicable to all types of plyx^oods and panelling. The Barrier Coating -- Specific embodiments of a non-flammable, inorganic, high temperature resist¬ ant coating, which can be applied to the wood plies by any method known to the art, viz. by brushing, spraying, rolling, roller-coating, are described by Ellis in his copending application. This disclosure contemplates that any formulation which meets these criteria could be used to form the fire barrier layer. The coating layer can be applied between one or several, or all of the plies, while the laminate is being laid up, prior to pressing and heat curing. It can also be applied to, or can be used to bond, txfo traditionally bonded multiple-ply layups. In addition, the coating can be applied to the front or top surface, and/or to the rear or loxver surface of the laminate. At any of these levels -- top, inter¬ mediate, or bottom -- the coating influences and/or prevents flame spread and fire penetration. The coating can be used alone as the adhesive or bonding agent, since it bonds tenaciously to the xvOod fibers. The length of time required for cure is a function of the specific coating formulation and the temperature. In the exemplary formulation discussed herein (a synergistic combination of two or three bonding systems, viz. magnesium oxide/magne¬ sium chloride, high alumina calcium alu inate cement, and a colloidal silica -- optional --), the coating normally requires two hours to set at ambient tempera¬ ture, but can be accelerated to 45 minutes at 120°F. The coating, consisting of both hydraulically-setting and chemical-setting systems, can cure anaerobically -- without access to air, and hence can cure when layered between the plies of the laminate. The coatings are easily sawed, nailed, or screxed. The thickness of the coating can be varied at will from a fe^ mils to 1/16" thick. The thicker the coating, the better the fire-barrier performance. The greater the number of plies to be coated, the thinner each glue line needs to be. The fluid coating can also be applied in the form of an impregnated fabric. Bonding peel strengths are equivalent. When using impregnated fabric, the glue line is thicker (on the order of 1/32" to 1/16") since the fabric holds more coating material. The fabrics add significantly to the flexural strength of the laminate. Fabrics which have been successfully used to date are: Non-woven, spunbonded and needled polyester fabrics (geotextiles) in several xv-eights (2.0 to 4.0 ounces per square yard); non-woven fiber¬ glass veil; woven fiberglass; x?oven carbon cloth; and woven aramid fabric ("Kevlar") . Fabrics of quartz, nylon, or other natural or synthetic or inorganic fibers could also be utilized. The coating-saturated ' fabric cures at the same rate as the coating alone. Where a specific non-combustible coating does not have the required bonding strength to a wood species veneer (ply), and if it is desirable to use conventional bonding adhesives, the coating may still be used as the fire barrier layer. The impregnated fabric referred to above, is air cured into a flat rigid sheet and trimmed to proper size. It may have a smooth surface by curing between release paper, or left with a matte finish by being cured uncovered. All of the commonly used plyx^ood adhesives (phenol formaldehyde, urea formaldehyde, melamines, resorcinol, and phenol resorcinol) show excellent adhesion to the type coatings discussed herein, and xvould probably show similar adhesion to other cementitious coatings. The cured coating and carrier fabric is laid up between the wood plies, using an adhesive layer on both sur¬ faces, and conventionally bonded by pressure and the heating cycle required of the adhesive. Finally, the bond or glue line between, the wood plies may be a mixture of conventional plywood adhesives and the non-combustible coating. All of the wood adhesives referred to above are compatible with the type aqueous-based non-combustible coating which is described herein. To 80-857. by weight of the freshly-prepared coating is added, xtfith adequate . mixing, 15 to 207. by weight of the selected adhesive, and the mix spread or applied to the xvood plies in the conventional manner. The hybrid system requires a different time/ emperature cure cycle for each of its major components. If the phenolic or urea adhesives are cured under their typical press cycles prior to the cure of the coating, the fluid of the coating boils off and all cementitious properties (as well as fire-barrier properties) are lost. Hence, the coating is permitted to cure first, although the cure may be accelerated by slight heating to 110°-120°F (or by adding known accelerators for both the MgO-MgCl2 and calcium aluminate systems) . After the coating cures (1 to 2 hours) as stated above, curing can take place "anaerobically" (xithout exposure to air) under the laid-up plies of the laminate, the remainder of the hybrid system is subjected to the time-temperature-pressure curve of the adhesive component. As noted above, the resorcinol adhesives do not require a heating cycle, so if they are used, the normal pressure lamination process serves for both the adhesive and the coating components. This hybrid bonding system adds water repellency and enhanced adhesion to the coating xtfithout detracting from the latter's fire barrier properties. The function of the coating, whether applied to the ' surface of tfre plywood panel, or applied as a "submerged" layer between one or several or . all of the plies, is to present an unbroken non-combustible barrier to the ' flame front, and thus prevent the ignition of the substrate to which it is applied. The coating is not primarily an insulation, since, with time, conductive heat transfer will bring the substrate temperature near to that of the heat source, if the heat source remains constant and does not die out due to lack of fresh fuel in the immediate area of the initial flame. Those coatings which contain molecularly-bound "water of hydration" serve as an insulation maintaining the substrate at a temperature no higher than 570°F, until all of the water has been driven off -- a period of time which depends upon the thickness of the coating. The energy required for this release is approximately 1000 BTU's per pound of water released. The coatings may contain from 40 to 547. by weight of this bound water. Until spontaneous auto-ignition temperature of the wood is reached (approximately 650°F [340°C] for 1 hour), in • the absence of an igniting flame touching the surface, the substrate will pyrolyze and char, but will not ignite and will not support surface flame nor burn-through. The char itself acts as an insulation, and resists temperature changes to the underlying wood -- which is important for strength retention. In Douglas Fir, the char base equilibrates at 550°F (288°C), well below the auto-ignition temperature of the wood. One quarter inch (1/4") inxv'ard from the char, the maximum temperature reached is 360°F (182°C) and at one' half inch (1/2") inward, the, maximum temperature is 200°F (93°C). This illustrates the importance of maintaining a. cohesive coating which prevents flame from igniting the substrate. Many types of non-combustible mostly inorganic coatings based on either hydraulic or chemical setting are capable of performing this function, and meeting the other performance parameters required for a satisfactory coating. These are well known in the art, and many variations and combinations are possible. Among the types of coatings may be. mentioned those based on Portland Cement, high alumina calcium alumi- nate cement, magnesium "oxychloride" and magnesium "oxysulphate"; calcium sulphate (Plaster of Paris), magnesium phosphates, alumina, silicas and silicates,, such as colloidal silicas and sodium, potassium, ammonium, and "organic" silicates, refractory composi¬ tions, and a wide variety of phosphate-bonded cementi- tious compounds. Ellis (1984) in the copending U.S. patent appli¬ cation Serial No. 603,799, filed April 25, 1984, entitled "FIRE BARRIER: I. COATINGS", referred to above, discloses the following composition, (Type II), as being one type of coating satisfactory for both surface application and "submerged" application, i.e., used either on the top or bottom of the plywood, and between the plies of wood laminates, when applied either alone or as an impregnated fabric. He discusses in detail the materials specifications and behavior for each ingredient, he also discloses six other formulations, all of which would also be satisfactory in this laminated plywood application. These coatings are the result of a synergistic reaction between two disparate binding systems, in which the stoichio ^ metric imbalance between the magne-sium oxide and magnesium chloride, caused by the need for sufficient fluidity in the mix to enable this subsystem to be applied as a paint or coating is compensated for by the high alumina calcium aluminate cement utilizing this excess liquid as its "water of hydration." The excess magnesium chloride solution, if not otherwise utilized, would normally lead to a film disruption (cracking and crazing), salt efflorescence, and a weak, soft coating. In these formulations, the MgCl2 solution is "sopped-up" by the calcium • aluminate binding system. The two binding systems complement each other, and retain their bond strength and coating integrity over different temperature ranges which span the normal fire cycle of 1800° to 1950°F. - 19 - CT/US85/01499 TYPE FORMULATION NO. II Part "A": Binder Components - Powders : Magnesium Oxide (MgO)!/ 400 grams High Alumina Calcium Aluminate Cement^./ 100 grams Silica Flour. 3 / 100 grams Titanium Dioxide (Ti0 *?-)'____ι •1,5c grams Part "B" : Gauging or Activator Components - Liquids: Magnesium Chloride Solution^.' ..440 cc (Optional) Niaproof No. 4 Anionic Surfactant / 4.0 cc 1/ "OXYMAG" or "MAGOX 98 LR" Grades from BASIC CHEMICALS, INC. (987, MgO) . 2 / "CA-25" from ALCOA, or "SECAR 80" from LONE STAR LAFARGE, INC. (807. AI2O3, 18% CaO. 3_/ Standard commercial commodity. ___/ Standard commercial commodity. _5/ MgCl2 Solution, 1.26 sp. gr. (30° Baumέ) prepared froM DOW CHEMICAL CO. Tech. grade Flake. ___/ 277. solution of sodium tetradecyl sulphate from NIACET CORP., Niagara Falls, New York. The yield from this batch size is 700 cc. In the FORMULATION NO. II, presented above, Part "A" is added to Part "B" with adequate mixing to the consistency of a house paint, and applied by brushing, spraying, roller coating, or flooding to yield the desired dried thickness. The fluid paint has a specific gravity of 1.71, and weighs 14.26 pounds per gallon. The coating develops an initial set in 1 hour, and a final set in 2 to 2 1/2 hours, and maximum strength in 24 hours. It dries crack-free. It is brilliant white, xv-ith high infrared radiation reflecti¬ vity. Since the dominant mode of heat transfer of a fire is by radiation, the difference between a white reflective surface (emittance of approximately 0.8) and a dull absorptive surface (emittance 0.3) results in a lowering of the surface temperature of several hundred degrees (at the 1900°-2000°F range) in the former. Where the surface of the plywood is coated with this v'hite paint, this surface directly faces the fire. Where the coatings are "submerged" and placed betxveen the plies, as the top ply is burned off, it exposes the bright white coating underneath. Usually two coats are applied to the surface, although one is adequate if an internal or "submerged" coating is also applied. The coating has a relatively low heat conductivity, and thus acts as a thermal insulator for a short period of time. There is little lateral spread of heat when exposed to the direct impingement of a 1950°F propane flame source of 1" diameter. The zone of influence, or halo (or penumbra), of 500° to 550°F extends, after 15-minute exposure, only an additional 1" to 1 1/2" in diameter, beyond which the temperature does not exceed 180° to 200°F. The coating used alone or impregnated into one of the fabrics listed previously, when cured, forms a hard highly abrasion-resistant ceramic-like layer (Mohs hardness of 5.5). It conforms with exqui- site detail to the surface of the wood substrate, and bonds tenaciously. The surface coating can also be tinted any desired color, or overprinted x?ith a pattern; or top-covered with xvall paper on the surface. The coating may be cured smooth and glistening (glabrous) or with a matte finish. Coating-impregnated woven fabrics (such as fiberglass fabric) have a pleasant decorative appearance. Surface coatings may be "field-applied", i.e. after panel installation, and handled as a special paint application, or factory- applied coatings can be "touched-up" after installation to repair any damage. When exposed to flame, .the coating retains its integrity, during the heat-up and exposure periods . Occasionally, depending on the speed of cool-down, i will show one or txo stress-relieving cracks. After 15 to 20 minutes ' exposure to the direct flame -- at a temperature of approximately 2000° to 2200°F -- the coating will show signs of calcination, but it still retains its integrity. The softer calcined areas can be scraped ax?ay, but they do not peel nor flake off on their oxm accord. When coated onto or impregnated into a natural fiber or synthetic resin woven or non-woven fabric, such as spunbond polyester, under the 1950°F propane torch for 30 to 60 minutes, the fabric does not combust, and there is zero plame spread from the area of the cone of impingement of the flame. The organic fabrics pyrolyze into a carbonized skeleton within the ennobling coating (and fiberglass melts) , but the structural strength of the coating holds the fabric together, and the flame does not penetrate to the opposite side of the barrier. The fabric serves both as a stro a, or supporting framexvork, and as a network of stress-relief foci. The numerous minute fibrils interlock with the crystallites as they form, leaving compressible points at which the volumetric changes associated with the heat-engendered phase changes in the cements have an opportunity to release their thermodynamic energies. They also serve to increase significantly the tensile strength and flexured modulus of the laminated plywood. A variety of types of laminated wood construction xfere fabricated using the inorganic high-temperature resistant non-combustible coating referred to above: (a) the coating alone, or the coating-impregnated woven or non-woven fabric applied to the top or exposed surface of 1/8", 1/4", 1/2" and 5/8"-thick standard interior/exterior plywood; and 1/8" doorskin^ (b) the coating alone, or coating-impregnated woven or non-woven fabric applied to the bottom or unexposed surface of these same products; (c) two, three, and four pieces of 1/4", 3/8" and 1/2" plywood, and 1/8" doorskin and l/4"-thick wall panelling were utilized as "plies" and bonded together with the coating, or the coating-impregnated fabric as the adhesive, and cured "anaerobically" at ambient tempera¬ tures in a press under slight pressure (20 to 30 psi) . [Each of the "plies" in these laminations actual¬ ly consisted of a standard 3-, 4- or 5-ply plywood, or doorskin bonded together with a standard thermo- setting organic resin adhesive]; (d) tx^o and three pieces of 1/4" 3-ply plyx^ood were bonded together using GEORGIA-PACIFIC GP 1948, urea-formaldehyde resin adhesive with ammonium sulphate catalyst at 1% concentration, under 100 psi pressure, at 300°F for 4 minutes, sandxiching betx^een each two pieces of plywood a cured coating-impregnated non-woven 3.0 oz per square yard spunbond polyester geotextile as the "submerged" coating layer; (e) top-surface coating applied to "submerged" coating bonded lami- nates; and (f) bottom-surface coating applied to "submerged" coating-bonded laminates. (This latter xas intended to function as the "final" barrier to prevent ignition and burn-through to any other substrate, e.g. roof sheathing subflooring, wall partitions, etc.). Txθ types of fire exposure tests were performed: (a) The propane torch test: The hottest part of the high-velocityj 1950°F flame was directed against the candidate coated sample, usually 9" x 9", or 12" x 12" in size, • or its uncoated- control. The samples xere mounted free standing at a 157. inclination off the vertical, and held steady in a test bracket for the test duration, which extended for as long as 60 minutes. Readings were taken every minute of the temperatures on the back, signs of discoloration, amount of smoke generated, evidence of coating crack¬ ing, surface burning, burn-through and temperature peripherally from the center of the flame contact; and (b) ASTM D-3806 "Small Scale Evaluation of Fire Retardant Paints (2-foot Tunnel method)." These were certified tests run by Applied Research Laboratories (ARL) of Miami, Florida, on 2-foot-long by 4"-xvide test panels. This test consists of impinging directly onto the surface coating a 2000°F gas flame supplying heat, at 5085 BTU's per hour, for 5 minutes, while the test panel is suspended above the burner, coated surface facing downward, at an upward angle, in a chamber. The angle of the test panel, and the draft of the chamber, encourages any flame in the coating and substrate initiated from the burner to proceed upxtfard along the substrate. The extent of this flame front is measured and compared with the known substrate standards (0 and 100). In addition to flame spread, the smoke density, fuel contributed, and weight loss are also recorded and calculated. Although this test is mainly concerned with flame spread along the sur¬ face, weight loss and visual inspection and depth measurement shoxtfs fire endurance (resistance, or burn-through protection) . Flame spread is the main factor associated with testing fire-retardant coatings. The "fire-retard- ant" coatings currently available are rated as low as 10, or as high as 60 or 70. The lower the rating, the longer the coating xfill retard flame. The following examples show that under the test conditions: (a) When high-temperature inorganic non-flammable coatings or coating-impregnated fabrics are applied to the front or "hot" surface of a laminated wood product (plyxv'oods) , they are capable of achieving zero (0) flame spread, as xvell as zero (0) smoke density, and zero (0) fuel contributed; and of stop- ping, or considerably sloxving down, fire penetration. This latter is a function, of flame exposure time. In a 5-minute test there is little penetration. In a 15 or 20-minute test, there is substrate charring but no flaming; (b) coatings or coating-impregnated fabrics applied to the rear, or "cold" surface of a laminated xtfood product, at a depth of 3/8" to 1/2" below the front surface, prevents flame from reaching the sub- strate on which it may be mounted, limits the burn- through area to a circle of only a couple of inches in diameter; and influences surface flame spread by restricting it to an area only slightly larger than the burn-through circle; (c) one or several internal or submerged coating layers -- coatings alone, or coating-impregnated fabrics between the wood plies, are highly effective in preventing fire penetration and burn-through. The flame is usually stopped by the first coating layer; continued flame exposure leaves a char behind that first coating layer. If not stopped by the first layer., flame penetration is stopped by the second coating layer. Even ' in exposures for as long as 60 minutes in the normally highly combustible doorskin laminates, made up of four layers of doorskin 1/8" thick, with 3 layers of coating alone between the plies, the flame did not penetrate to the rear surface. Moreover, the flame spread on the surface, as xvell as the hole which did penetrate to the second layer of coating, was restricted to 2" to 2 1/2" in diameter. As a general rule, when the surface is uncoated, the closer the first layer of internal or submerged coating is to the surface of the panel, the greater its ef ectiveness in decreasing surface flame spread; (d) a surface coating backed up by one or txtfo internal coats at 1/8" to 1/4" depth below the surface coat yielded substantially zero (0) surface flame spread, and a minimum of flame penetration. The coatings and the coating-impregnated fabrics, applied to the rear of the panels, almost alx^ays retained their integrity, remaining whole, and pre¬ vented flame from penetrating through to the space on the other side. In practice, this would prevent a chimney effect involving spaces between studs; and if applied to roofing shingles, would prevent ignition of the roofing sheathing. In addition, this rear coating may obviate the necessity for utilizing gypsum wallboard as a rear fire-barrier. An additional advantage of the coating systems is that by greatly reducing flame spread and penetra¬ tion, they decidedly decrease smoke emission. V. EXAMPLES AND TEST RESULTS: EXAMPLE I (Surface Coating Alone) A batch of Type Formulation No. II paint, as given above, was prepared and used to brush coat the surface of a 6" x 15" x 3/8"-thick inte- rior/exterior plywood board. Two coatings x?ere applied, on successive days. Total dry thickness of the coats x/as 16 mils. The adhesion betx^een the tx^o coats was excellent, and no line of demarcation could be noted. The coating x?as permitted to cure for two days prior to testing. The sample and its uncoated control i/ere submitted to Propane Torch tests, as described above. Uncoated Control Panel : - Within 20 seconds after application of the flame, the uncoated board caught fire. The surface flamed in all directions, quickly extending to a diameter of 5" from the epicenter, but principally upward from the point of the torch impact, and continued burning on the surface as xell as progressively deeper. The panel completely burned through in three mintues . With the torch removed after 3 minutes, the panel continued to burn both on the surface and through all layers of the complete panel depth. The result was a mass of charred, cracked pieces and some ash -- almost complete combustion in the upper 7" of the panel prior to extinguishing the flaming brand. Surface Coated Panel: For the first five minutes of torch application, results were minimal and hardly noticeable. The coating held its integrity, and there was zero flame spread on the surfafce, and no noticeable changes in the substrate. Temperature on the rear surface was about 15°F above ambient of 76°F. The coating showed signs of calcination only in the 1" diameter area directly under the flame, and in an additional 1" penumbra around the central core -- i.e., for a total diameter of 3". At 6 minutes, the substrate wood showed signs of carbonizing (pyro- lysis), and thin wisps of smoke emerged, but there x^as no ignition, nor combustion. This initial "smoking" is principally due to moisture vapor (steam) being driven off during the heating from both the coating (water of hydration) and from the substrate (adsorbed moisture) . Smoke became slightly more dense as the adhesive pyrolyzed, and the smoke density increased up to the 10-minute mark, after which it decreased. The depth of carbonization gradually progressed. At 12 minutes there was the first indication of a slight broxzning on the back of the board, xtfhich increased only slightly until the end of the 15-minute test period. At no time was there any ignition or combustion of the substrate. There was zero surface flame spread. The surface area affected was limited to the 3" diameter of calcined coating, beyond which the coating was entirely unaffected. The coating continued to adhere well to the substrate xtfithout indication of debonding. The pyrolyzed area under the point of flame impingement was likexfise limited to the approximately 3" diameter directly under the area of the surface flame application. There was no further spread. This test was replicated several times with essentially similar results. Some tests xtfere run for 20 and 30 minutes. The only noticeable changes were a progressive increase in the depth of carbonization, until full charring on the rear. Continued exposure to the constant 1950°F propane torch flame finally results, at approxima- tely 28 to 30 minutes t in "burn-through", in which the char itself fractures and finally ignites in the limited area under the flame. However, there is still no further extension of surface flame spread. This test demonstrates that surface coating alone, using a high temperature non-combustible "paint", with adequate cohesive strength to withstand the thermal stresses xvithout cracking, and the adhesive strength not to debond, could be used as a fire-barrier in preventing both surface flame spread and flame penetration. This test is more severe than that encountered in actual fire situations in that under fire conditions it is unlikely that the flame source xtfould be either this intense or concentrated in such a small area, or for such a prolonged period of time. EXAMPLE I A (Single Coat Impregnated Polyester Geotextile) Two 24" x 4" x 1/4" pieces of interior/- exterior 3-ply laminated plywood were subjected to the ASTM D-3806 test for a 5-minute burn. Tests were performed by an independent test labora¬ tory (Applied Research Laboratories of Miami, Florida) (ARL) . One coat of Type II Formulation Paint was brush-applied to the surface of one panel, and a layer of 3.0 oz. HOECHST spunbond non-xvoven polyester fabric laid into the coating, which impregnated and ennobled the fabric. The other panel was left as the uncoated control. Uncoated Control: - Flame spread was 73.0; percent -weight loss, 58.67.; smoke density, 543.4. After burn, remnants were a few broken pieces of charcoal, carbonized throughout. Coated Panel: - Flame spread was zero (0); percent x^eight loss 3.07.; smoke density, The xveight loss was due to a loss of moisture in the panel, and the smoke due mainly to the development of steam, since there was no carbonization of the substrate, which shox^ed practically no change in this severe (2000°F direct-flame impingement for 5 minutes) but limited time test. EXAMPLE I B (Single Surface Coating-Impregnated Polyester Geotextile) Coated Panel: - 12" x 12" x 1/2" 5-ply interior-exterior plywood. HOECHST spunbond poly¬ ester geotextile 3.0 oz. per square yard, impreg¬ nated with Type II formulation coating, applied to the surface of the panel. Tested with Propane Torch. Steam started to emerge at 3 1/2 minutes; no decrepidation of coating; at 5 minutes, the coating was "white hot", at 7 minutes the coating had calcined, but did not crack under the area of the flame. Slight smoke emission. At 10 minutes, heavy smoke emission. Carbonization under the flame was 1/4" deep. No substrate flaming. Zero surface flame spread, and no surface flaming. Subsurface carbonization was restricted to the area directly under the flame (1 1/2" diameter) and a penumbral area of an additional 1" diameter -- a total of 3 1/2" in diameter. Test xvas stopped at 10 minutes. The impregnated fabric had served as an effective fire-barrier for both the surface and the substrate. ' EXAMPLE II (Coating Alone Applied to Rear of Wood Wall Panelling) Two coats of Type II formulation coating, applied to the rear surface of 24" x 4" x 5 /32" xvood wall panelling (Georgia-Pacific 3-ply untreated "Cedar Hollow" simulated wood grain (printed finish) totalling 1 gram of dried paint _ ^ _ per square inch of surface. This panel and its uncoated control xvere subjected to a 5-minute ASTM-D-3806 flame test by Applied Research Laboratories (ARL) of Miami, Florida. Flame was applied to the front (printed finish) surface. Results xere as follox^s: Uncoated Control : - Flame Spread 69.0; percent xveight loss, 77.797,; smoke density, 584.27.; fuel contributed, 58.6. Coated Specimen: - Flame spread, 28.9; percent xveight loss, 13.227,; smoke density 71.17.; fuel contributed, 0. This test indicated that applying the coating to the rear of the panel, at a depth 5/32" below the surface, was capable of affecting and decreasing surface flame spread, as well as the depth of flame penetration. EXAMPLE II A (Coating Impregnated Fabric on Front Surface of Wood Wall Panelling) This test was a continuation of Example II. Another 24" x 4" x 5/32" piece of the same type of wall panelling xvas coated on the front surface with a 6-oz. per square yard open-weave fiberglass fabric, impregnated xvith the ' same coating formulation, and subjected to a 5-minute ASTM D-3806 flame test. The flame x?as applied to the rear (uncoated) surface. Results were: Flame spread, 33.4; percent weight loss, 15.057.; smoke density, 19.77.; fuel contributed, 0. Except for the significantly lower smoke density attributed to the fact that the printed grain finish on the flat surface was not being burned, the results were similar to Example II. This test tends to confirm the observation that a fire-barrier coating on the opposite side of a panel aids in slowing doxvn flame spread on a surface. EXAMPLE III (Coating Alone, Used to Laminate Two Pieces of Plyxyood) Two pieces of l/4"-thick, 3-ply, interior/exterior plywood, 12" x 12", were laminated together using Type II paint formulation as the bonding adhesive, in a layer approximately 1/8" thick. The coating xas tinted with American Hoechst 17-3010 Colonyl Caramel FK pigment, to yield a pine yelloxv color, which so matched the color of the plywood that the combination fire- barrier and- bonding layer was indistinguishable from that of the plyxvood laminate. The coating made a superb adhesive, forming a strong bond between the txro plywood panels . The panel was exposed to the Propane Torch test. The surface of the xvood ignited immedi¬ ately and burned, but the burning was restricted to a zone 2" to 3" in diameter around the flame tip. The burning continued carbonizing the three top lamina of plywood, and reached the coating layer in four minutes. The coating layer was not penetrated by the flame, and for the next 10 minutes, there was no combustion of the panel behind the barrier coating. There was a gradual carbonization (but no flaming, and no flame spread) of this second plywood sheet. Testing continued for 15 minutes, xith no further changes. The coating bond did not delaminate under the influence of the heat of the propane torch, and did not crack. The buried (or submerged) coating had prevented the burn-through of the panel. EXAMPLE III A (Coating-Impregnated Fabric Used to Laminate Two Pieces of Plywood) A companion test to Example III. Two 12" x 12" x 1/4" 3-ply interior/exterior plyxrood pieces were bonded together using a 12" x 12" piece of Hoechst spunbond non-xvoven 3.0 oz. per square yard polyester, impregnated xvith Type II Formulation paint as the bonding agent. This served as an excellent adhesive, forming a bond which showed no line of separation even after the joined panel xvas subjected to heavy hammer blows. The panel was tested by the Propane Torch method. Results were similar to Example III. Combustion was restricted to the top panels only, and the flame spread restricted to a 3-1/2" to 4" diameter circle. Flame penetration did not extend below the coating layer. This, test again demonstrated that the coating serves as an efficient fire barrier to prevent burn-through in laminated plyxvood. EXAMPLE III B (Coating Alone Used to Laminate Two Pieces of Plywood) Two pieces of interior/exterior plywood, 24" x 4" were bonded together. One piece was 1/4" thick (3-ply); the other piece was 1/2" thick (4-ply) using Type II Formulation coating as the adhesive. Two similar sets were constructed, with the same quantity of coating in each set. Both sets were subjected to the ASTM-D-3806 5-minute burn test by Applied Research Laboratories of Miami, Florida. The objective was to study the influence of the "submerged" barrier coating on flame spread and the influence of the nearness to the surface of this coating on that flame spread. Other tests had shown that barrier coatings on the rear of a panel limited the flame spread on the uncoated surface. Hence, in one set, the flame xvas applied to the l/4"-thick panel surface; in the other set, the flame xvas applied to the l/2"-thick panel surface. The results were as follows: 1/4" Panel 1/2" Panel Surface Surface Flame Spread 33.4 69.0 Percent Weight Smoke Density 132.97. 69.77. ' Fuel Contributed 0 6.97, . In both cases, the flame did not penetrate through the submerged coating layer, and the coating did not debond under the heat of the test. The 1/4" panel surface showed flame scorch on only one-half of the panel length; the 1/2" panel surface showed flame scorch over the entire length of the panel. The test indicates that the closer the coating is to the surface, the greater the flame spread protection. EXAMPLE IV (Coating Applied Betxyeen Two and Four Pieces of Doorskin) Two and four pieces of 3-ply veneer doorskin, 8" x 8", were bonded together using Type II formulation between each of the layers as the adhesive. The txvo-piece unit made a panel 5/16" thick; the 4-piece unit' made a panel 1/2" thick. Uncoated control panels were made up using doorskin stapled together xvith a staple gun. Both were subjected several times to the Propane Torch test. Control Panels: - The doorskin was highly flammable. Within 20 to 30 seconds of applying the torch, they ignited and were completely con¬ sumed by flame within 3 to 5 minutes, leaving a few scraps of carbonized charcoal. Txyo-Layer Doorskin Sample: - The flame quickly punched a 1" diameter hole through the top layer, until it reached the barrier coating. No flame spread beyond the 1" diameter additional penumbra. Flame xvas effectively stopped by the coating. On a 25-minute test the rear of the panel gradually carbonized, but did not flame; the coating while "xvhite-hot" remained intact and did not crack; paper placed on the opposite side of the coating scorched, but did not flame. Four-Layer Doorskin Sample: - The flame punched a l"-diameter hole through the top layer, xvhich xvith time enlarged to 3" diameter; flame xvas stopped by the first barrier coating layer; the second layer of veneer carbonized under the first barrier coating, but did not flame or combust. A total of 46 minutes xvas required for the rear surface to be carbonized, but at no time during the test did the second, third or fourth layers combust. The three layers of barrier coating, separated by wood char, had formed not only a flame barrier, but a carbonaceous insulation which prevented flame spread. The pyrolyzed area On the rear of the panel was only 1" in diameter. Other tests xvith four layer doorskin samples showed that the panels resist the flame for more than 60 minutes without burning through. The multilayer panels xvith coating applied between each 1/8" thick veneer, xvere effective in preventing both surface flame spread and depth penetration, and indicate the possibility of constructing multilayer plywood panels xvith fire-barrier properties. VI. CONCLUSION It will be apparent from the foregoing discussion, that this invention provides a refrac¬ tory-hard, ' high temperature, non-combustible coating which is composed of a mutually compatible and synergistic series of hydraulic-setting and chemical setting inorganic cements, which are caused to set by one and the same activator. For example, in the formulations designated Types I, II, III, IV and V, a magnesium chloride acti- vator solution is employed both as the "gauging" solution for the MgO to cause a chemical reaction which results in a solid solution that is "magne- sium oxychloride complex", and is the hydrating agent xvhich supplies the xvater for the setting of the high alumina calcium aluminate cement. Within this context, then, this invention provides a fire resistant laminate for retarding flame spread and flame penetration therethrough. The laminate comprises (A) a solid, combustible lamina; and (B) bonded to said lamina (A), a hard, thin, continuous layer comprising an inor¬ ganic cementitious composition. Layer (B) is capable of .,maintaining its structural ' strength and dimensional stability with zero flame spread when exposed to a flame temperature of 2000°F for a time period of . one hour. The inorganic cementitious composition in a fluid state is capable of adhesively bonding to xvood and maintain¬ ing an adhesive bond to the xvood after the fluid composition is dried to form the solid, thin layer. The inorganic cementitious composition consists essentially of (1) a mixture of two or more hydraulic setting or chemical setting inorganic cements, and (2) an activator. Each of the cements is caused to set at a temperature to about 120°F within about 45 minutes by the activator. The resulting laminate has a fire retardant classification of Class I (or A) . The above-cited teachings and examples in this disclosure demonstrate that most of the objectives of the invention have been accomplished -- at least on a laboratory scale --, viz. impart¬ ing to plywood, wood panelling, doorskin, and multilayered wood veneers, sufficient fire retard¬ ancy so the laminated structures by themselves, xvithout the need of other structural barriers, could form a fire-barrier to both surface flame spread and burn-through, and meet the requirements of a Class I (or A) Flame Spread Index Value. This has been accomplished by utilizing a high-temperature, non-combustible inorganic coating with good wood adhesive characteristics, either alone, or as a coating-impregnated fabric, as the bonding agent between various combinations of wood veneer plies, and, optionally, as a top surface or bottom surface coating. This system overcomes many of the deficiencies of currently-used systems, such as pressure impregnating with fire retardant salts, or surface coating with intumescent paints; and xvill introduce a minimum of operational changes in the manufacturing procedures commonly used for these laminated articles. Having described my invention in parti¬ cular embodiments, it is' to be understood that various alternatives and substitutions xvill become apparent to those skilled in the art from a reading of the foregoing descriptions. Accordingly, it is not intended that the scope of the claims appended hereto be limited to the description set forth herein, but rather that the claims be construed as encompassing all the features of patentable novelty which reside in the present invention, including all features xvhich would be treated as equivalent thereof by those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains. Having described my invention of a novel fire barrier system for laminated plywood and similar constructions, I make the following claims:

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A fire resistant laminate for retarding flame spread and flame penetration therethrough, said laminate comprising: (A) a solid, . combustible lamina; and (B) bonded to said lamina (A), a hard, thin, continuous layer comprising an inorganic cementitious composition; xvherein said layer (B) is capable of maintaining its structural strength and dimensional stability xvith zero flame spread when exposed to a flame temperature of 2000°F for a time period of 1 hour; and wherein said inorganic cementitious composition in a fluid state is capable of adhesi¬ vely bonding to wood and .maintaining an adhesive bond after drying to form said thin layer; and wherein said inorganic cementitious composition consists essentially of (1) a mixture of txvo or more hydraulic setting or chemical setting inorganic cements, and (2) an activator, xvherein each of said cements is caused to set at a temperature up to about 120°F xvithin about 45 minutes by said activator; said laminate having a Class I (or A) fire retardancy classification. 2. Fire resistant laminate according to claim 1 in which said inorganic cements are -% i selected from the group consisting of high alumina calcium aluminate cement, magnesium oxychloride cement and magnesium oxysulphate cement. 3. Fire resistant laminate according to claim 2 in xvhich said inorganic cementitious composition contains colloidal silica. 4. Fire resistant laminate according to claim 3 in which layer (B) is up to about 1/16 inch thick. 5. Fire resistant laminate according to claim 3 in which said cementitious composition is coated on a natural or synthetic fibrous sheet of woven or non-woven fabric. 6. Fire resistant laminate according to claim 5 in which said fabric is comprised of fibers selected from the group consisting of fiberglass, aramid, polyester, nylon, carbon and quartz fibers. 7. Fire resistant laminate according to claim 3 in which said combustible lamina (A) is comprised .of wood. 8. Fire resistant laminate according to claim 7 in which said layer (B) has txvo opposing lateral faces, and solid, combustible, xvood lamina (A) are bonded to each of said faces to form a plywood laminate. 9. Fire resistant laminate according to claim 8 in xvhich said wood lamina are adhesively bonded to said layer (B) . 10. Fire resistant laminate according to claim 9 wherein said wood lamina are adhesively bonded to said layer (B) xvith a xvood-bonding adhesive selected from the group consisting of phenol-formaldehyde, urea-formaldehyde, resorcinol, melamine, melamine-urea and urea resins. 11. Fire resistant laminate according to claim 8 in which said layer (B) has a MOHS hardness of at least about 3.0. 12. Fire resistant laminate according to claim 1 in xvhich said combustible lamina (A) is comprised of wood.

Inventors: ELLIS HAROLD, ELLIS, HAROLD
Applicants: DELPHIC RES LABOR, DELPHIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC.
Application year: 1985
Main classification: C04B35
IPC codes: B32B7, B32B13, C04B28