ROOF CONTAINING PLASTIC MEMBRANE

Abstract: A roof structure is disclosed which contains a plastic roofing membrane containing a predominant amount of an internally plasticized vinyl chloride copolymer resin, prefer­ ably in combination with a lesser amount of chlorinated polyethylene.

Description: ROOF CONTAINING PLA'STIC MEMBRANE Background of the Invention Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a novel roof structure containing a plastic roofing membrane. Description of the Prior Art Roofing membranes containing vinyl chloride polymers in conjunction with external plasticizers are known. Such products, however, have a number of shortcomings. The plasticizer can migrate from the membrane causing embrittlement and possible shrinkage with the. passage of time. Also, the presence of the external plasticizer can cause incompatibility between the membrane and such adjacent roofing materials as foam insulation, coal tar bonding substances, and the like. Incompatiblity will manifest itself by the lack of secure bonding between the membrane and such adjacent materials thereby allowing for the penetration of such undesired elements as moisture, heat or cold, and the like, into the interior of the building. It has been suggested in British Patent No. 1,399,282 that vinyl acetate-ethylene copolymer be added to roofing membranes as an external, non-migratory plasticizer for vinyl chloride polymers in an apparent effort to overcome the problems associated with external plasticization. Such resulting roofing membranes would also contain bitumen. Although an internally plasticized resin has been suggested for use in vapor barrier formulations for buildings (Taiwanese Patent No. 12,563), there has been no suggestion of using such a formulation in a roofing system due to its unacceptable low temperature and elongation characteristics. Preformed elastomeric roofing membranes should generally have ultimate elongations of from about 200% to about 400% and should be able to withstand low temperature conditions of -300C. or lower, preferably -400C. or lower, without cracking upon impact, e.g., from footsteps, hail stones, falling tree branches, etc., and without loss of flexibility, e.g., as manifested by loss of elongation characteristics. The vapor barrier formulations shown in the Taiwanese patent have unacceptably lower elongation characteristics (i.e.,100-195%) and inferior lower temperature characteristics (e.g., Clash Berg temperatures of OOto -250C.) for roofing applications. Summary of the Present Invention The present invention comprises a roof in which the plastic roofing membrane in such a roof comprises a predominant amount of an internally plasticized vinyl chloride copolymer resin. Detailed Description of the Present Invention Roofing membranes conventionally are supported by a roof deck formed of a durable building material such as concrete, metal, or wood. The roof deck is, in turn, supported by the upper portion of suitable roof support means which are also formed of a durable building material. Insulation (e.g.,glass fibers,expanded foam, etc.) can be disposed between the roofing membrane and roof deck, if desired, or can be placed on top of the membrane. The top of such roofs generally also contain a ballast layer formed of thin concrete or mortar slabs, tiles, pebbles, gravel or the like, to protect the underlying layers and to provide sufficient mass to prevent either flotation of the membrane/insulation layer(s) by water lying on the roof and/or movement due to strong winds. U.S. Patent Nos. 3,411,256, 3,763,614 and 4,045,934 illustrate the general structure of roofs to which the present invention relates. The present invention relates to the use of a plastic roofing membrane comprising a predominant amount of an internally plasticized vinyl chloride copolymer resin in the type of roof structure described above. The word "predominant" as used herein is to be construed as meaning that the internally plasticized resin is present in larger amount than any other polymeric or resinous component. The terminology "internally plasticized vinyl chloride oopolymer" is intended to cover those copolymers formed from a reaction medium which comprises an effective amount of at least one plasticizing comonomer for vinyl chloride monomer. Internally plasticized resins, therefore, are those which have a plasticizing agent copolymerized into the resin during polymerization as opposed to a resin to which a plasticizer is added during compounding. Internally plasticized vinyl chloride copolymer resins suitable for use in the present invention can be formed by polymerizing vinyl chloride monomer in the presence of an effective amount (e.g., 10% to 50%, by weight) of at least one comonomer which functions as an internal plasticizer. Included within this class are the alkyl acrylates and methacrylates containing up to about 18 carbon atoms in their alkyl groups, the vinyl esters of carboxylic acids and ethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acids, their anhydrides, and their mono- and dialkyl esters containing up to about 20 carbon atoms in their alkyl groups. The internally plasticized resin suitable for use in the present invention should have a Tg of from about -10 C. to about 300C. and should give a vinyl film having a Shore "A" hardness of about 80 to about 95 when no functional additives nor substantial amounts of plasticizer are present. A preferred internally plasticized copolymer resin for use in the roofing membrane used in the present invention is described in U.S. Patent No. 4,147,853 to J. C. Goswami et al., which is incorporated herein by reference. This copolymer comprises: (1) from about 50% to about 85%, by weight, vinyl chloride; (2) from about 38 to about 47%, by weight, of a C6-C,O alkyl acrylate; and from about 47% to about 3%, by weight, of a bis(hydrocarbyl)vinylphosphonate of the formula: EMI4.1 wherein X is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, halogen, cyano, aryl, such as phenyl, C1-C1 8 alkyl and EMI5.1 wherein R and R' are hydrocarbyl and substituted hydrocarbyl groups consisting essentially of hydrogen and carbon, and containing up to about 18 carbon atoms, inclusive, with the proviso that R and R' may be the same, different or conjoint, i.e., R and R' may combine to form one single radical. Preferred weight amounts for the comonomers used to make the copolymer are: (1) from about 55% to about 80%, by weight, vinyl chloride; (2) from about 10% to about 35%, by weight, of the acrylate; and (3) from about 5% to about 25% by weight of the vinylphosphonate. A particularly preferred acrylate is 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, while particularly preferred vinylphosphonates are bis(beta-chloroethyl)vinylphosphonate and bis(2-ethylhexyl)vinylphosphonate. The aforementioned internally plasticized copolymer can be formed by conventional bulk, emulsion, suspension, or solution polymerization procedures, although suspension polymerization is preferred. Also useful in the present invention is the internally plasticized resin described in U.S. Patent No. 4,210,739 to R. E. Gallagher et al. which comprises from about 45% to about 80%, by weight, vinyl chloride, from about 15% to about 54%, by weight, of a C2-C70 alkyl acrylate, and from about 10% to about 15% by weight, of at least one Cs-C22 dialkyl maleate or fumarate. The use of the above-described internally plasticized resin allows for production of a roofing membrane having the desired degree of flexibility without the use of significant amounts (i.e., over about 15-20%) of external plasticizer such as employed in certain prior art membranes containing vinyl chloride polymers. Liquid external plasticizer tends to migrate from the membrane causing such problems as embrittlement and possible shrinkage of the membrane. Generally speaking, the amount of internally plasticized resin in the membrane can range from about 25% to about 75%, by weight of the membrane depending upon the precise type of membrane required. In order to confer the most desired low temperature characteristics on the roofing membrane, a polymeric ingredient capable of improving such characteristics is also preferably included in the formulation in an amount less than the amount of internally plasticized resin. This additive can be present at from about 5% to about 40%, by weight of the membrane. Exemplary additives include chlorinated polyethylene (chlorine content: 25%-48%, by weight, preferably 36%-42%) and ethylene/carbon monoxide terpolymers of the type described in U.S. Patent No. 3,780,140 to C. F. Hammer. The latter are available under the trademark ELVALOY from E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and comprise 40-80% ethylene, 3-30% carbon monoxide and 10-60% termonomer (e.g., vinyl acetate). A number of other additives are used in making the roofing membrane used in the present invention. Included as potential additives are the following: (a) fillers and/or pigments. The amount of filler that is chosen can range from about 0% to about 40%, by weight. Fillers and pigments are used to control color, opacity and flammability, to control cost without sacrifice in desired properties, and to aid in the calendering of the film forming composition. Representative fillers include such inorganic fillers as titanium dioxide, antimony oxide, calcium carbonate, zinc oxide, white lead, gypsum, precipitated silica, carbon black, and red iron oxide. Others are well known to a person of ordinary skill in the art. (b) monomeric and polymeric process aids. These additives serve to aid in the processing of the calenderable film forming composition. Included are polymeric additives such as poly(alpha methyl)styrene or acrylic polymers which function as process aids. These additives may be used at from about 3% to about 10%, by weight of the film. (c) lubricants. These may be present at from about 0.58 to about 3%, by weight of the film. Included as representative lubricants are stearic acid, stearamide, the polyethylene waxes, hydrocarbon oils, and the like. (d) stabilizers and antioxidants. These may be present at from about 3% to about 10%, by weight of the film. Included are the stearate salts, the epoxidized vegetable oils, alkyl-aryl phosphites, dibutyl tin dilaurate, and tin mercaptides. Others that may be selected are well known to persons of ordinary skill in the art. Other functional additives that can be present in relatively minor amount (under 2%, by weight, of the film) include ultraviolet light stabilizers, drying agents, and the like The first step in forming the sheet of the present invention, in accordance with a preferred embodiment is the formation of a film forming composition which can be calendered and which has good chemical resistance and outdoor durability. The aforementioned internally plasticized resin, filler and/or pigment, monomeric and polymeric process aid, lubricant, and stabilizers and antioxidant components can be selected in the aforementioned amounts, if desired. These selected ingredients are mixed until they are in the form of a homogeneous powdery composition. They can be then mixed under sufficient heat and pressure to yield a composition of a more fluid consistency. After passing through a strainer apparatus they are ready for calendering. This film formulation is then calendered at a temperature and pressure which allows formation of a film having a preferred thickness of about 500 microns to about 1250 microns. A calendering temperature of from about 1200C. to about 1600C. is recommended. The following Examples illustrate certain embodiments of the present invention. EXAMPLE 1 This Example sets forth the process for making a preferred roofing membrane for use in accordance with the present invention. Each of the materials listed below were added to a blender and mixed for twenty minutes at 200C. Ingredient Parts by Weight*** Clay extender (BURGESS KE Brand) 11.0 Titanium Oxide/Colored Pigment Blend* 6.2 Antimony Oxide flame re tardant (CHEMETRON L brand) 2.00 Internally plasticized resin** 35.00 Ba/Cd heat stabilizer (SYNPRON 1517 brand) 5.00 * comprises 6.05 parts by weight TiO2 with the remainder being colored pigments. ** this is a copolymer of 75% vinyl chloride, 18% 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, and 7% bis(beta chloroethyl)vinylphosphonate. *** based on the weight of all ingredients used. To the resulting mixture were added the following which were then mixed for ten minutes at 200 C.: Ingredient Parts by Weight Dioctyl azelate plas ticizer 6.93 Arsenical fungicide solution (VINYZENE BP-5 brand) 2.75 Hindered phenolic anti oxidant (IRGANOX 1010 brand) 1.32 Phosphite chelator (SYNPRON 1535 brand) 0.50 To the resulting mixture were added the following ingredients, and mixing was initiated for an additional 15 minutes at 200C. Ingredient Parts by Weight Poly o;-methyl sty rene process aid (AMOCO 18-210 brand) 3.00 Bis-stearamide lubri cant (ADVAWAX 240 brand) 0.30 Partially oxidized poly ethylene lubricant (PE-190 brand) 0.50 Chlorinated Polyethyl ene (DOW CPE-3614) 25.00 Dilauryl thiodipro pionate 0.50 The homogeneous mixture from the blender was conveyed to a continuous mixer and was mixed at a temperature of 135 C. until a soft, plastic calenderable mass was formed. This mass was then calendered at a temperature of 1500C, to form a film having a thickness of 530 microns. EXAMPLE 2 This Example illustrates the tensile strength, percent elongation and secant modulus at 100% elongation for films made in accordance with Example 1 after various types of conditioning treatments. "MD" stands for the "machine direction" of calendering, whereas "CD" stands for the "cross direction". Sec. Mod. at Tensile Str. 100% Elong. Sample Size- (MD/CD) % Elong. (MD/CD) Condition (kg/cm ) (MD/CD) (kg/cm2) A 75.09/54.00 386/470 41.20/29.32 -untreated B 74.86/56.03 403/490 42.32/30.94 -untreated A 114.39/95.06 328/348 71.43/55.96 -Heat Aged (1300C /24 hrs.) with 18 hr. Recovery B 72.28/53.50 390/450 43.73/28.47 -Heat Aged* (79.40C./7 days) C 72.28/59.83 358/398 50.13/37.26 -Heat Aged** (79.40C./21 days) - B 68.90/48.58 316/422 47.11/31.50 -3 month accelerated aging x B 64.89/50.76 344/325 42.68/36.07 -3 month accelerated agingxx Sec. Mod. at Tensile Str. 100% Elong. Sample Size- (MD/CD) % Elong. (MD/CD) Condition (kg/cm2) (MD/CD) (kg/cm2) B 59.13/39.37 340/460 34.59/23.34 -Coated with coal tar and aged for 3 months Sample Size A was 11.43 cm. x 0.64 cm. with a thick ness of 533.4 microns. Sample Size B was 7.63 cm. x 0.64 cm. with a thick ness of 533.4 microns. Sample Size C was 7.63 cm. x 0.64 cm. with a thick ness of 965.2 - 1041.4 microns. *heat aging was performed between expanded poly styrene insulation. No effect was noted on the insulation. This shows good compatibility between these two substances. **heat aging was performed between expanded poly styrene insulation. No effect was noted on the insulation. Xaccelerated aging was performed in a FADE-O-METER accelerated aging apparatus using test procedure ASTM D1501 with the variations of using 24 alter nating sunlamps and black lights and conducting the test at ambient temperature without added moisture. Xxaccelerated aging was performed in a WEATHER-O METER accelerated aging apparatus using test pro cedures ASTM G26 (machine operation) and D-2565 (sample exposure procedures). +coated with 76.2 - 127.0 microns of coal tar. The coal tar adherence to the film was good after 3 mos. This illustrates good compatibility and indicates that the instant roofing membrane can be installed adjacent an asphalt or coal tar surface in the roof without the additional presence of a separator or barrier sheet. EXAMPLE 3 The ingredients listed below were milled on a tworoll mill at about 162.80C. to about 165.60C. for about 10 minutes: Ingredient Parts by Weight Internally Plasticized Resin 35.0 (from Example 1) Chlorinated Polyethylene 25.0 Poly(alpha methyl) styrene processing aid 3.0 Dioctyl azelate platicizer 6.0 Octyl epoxy tallate (DRAPEX 4.4 brand) 4.0 Ba/Cd stabilizer (SYNPRON 1517 brand) 3.0 Phosphite chelator (SYNPRON 1535 brand) 0.5 Dilauryl thiodipropionate 0.5 Titanium dioxide pigment 9.0 Partially oxidized poly ethylene (PE-190 brand) 0.7 Bis-stearamide lubricant (ADVAWAX 240 brand) 0.3 Antimony oxide flame retardant (CHEMETRON L brand) 2.0 Clay extender (BURGESS KE brand) 11.0 Three differing formulations were prepared with the difference being the type of chlorinated polyethylene; ; Formulation Type of CPE A DOW CPE 4213* brand B DOW CPE 3614** brand C DOW CPE 3615*** brand * DOW CPE-4213 has a chlorine content of 42% and a melt viscosity of 18,500 poises. ** DOW CPE-3614 has a chlorine content of 36% and a melt viscosity of 21,500 poises. *** DOW CPE-3615 has a chlorine content of 36% and a melt viscosity of 26,500 poises. Masland impact test results (ASTM D-1790-76) for each formulation are as follows: Formulation -28.9C. -34.40C. -40. A Failed Not tested Not tested B Passed Passed Passed C Passed Passed Passed These data indicate that it is preferred to use the chlorinated polyethylene having the 36% chlorine content as contrasted to the 42% chlorine level. COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 4 This Example illustrates, for comparative purposes, certain selected physical properties for a commercially available externally plasticized vinyl roofing membrane for comparison against the results shown in Examples 2 and 4, for example, relating to the instant invention. Sec. Mod. at Tensile Str. 100% Elong. Sample Size- (MD/CD) % Elong. (MD/CD) Condition (kg/cm ) (MD/CD) (kg/cm2) A 289.97/186.38 390/383 90.63/90.84 -untreated B 204.59/194.26 410/388 100.26/93.58 -untreated B 191.24/177.31 330/317 111.23/107.29 -Heat Aged* (79.40C./7 days3- B 205.16/216.62 350/358 128.31/127.89 -Heat Aged** (79.40C. for 21 days) B 153.27/154.46 275/240 82.68/93.93 -Coated with coal tar and aged for 3 months-*** Sample Size A was 11.43 cm. x 0.64 cm. with a thickness of 1168.4 - 1193.8 microns. Sample Size B was 7.63 cm. x 0.64 cm. with a thickness of 1168.4 - 1193.8 microns. * heat aging was performed between expanded poly styrene insulation. About 50% of the insulation became compressed as a result of the test. ** heat aging was performed between expanded poly styrene insulation which became completely compressed. *** the coal tar layer flaked off aftertheagingperiod. The above data indicate loss of elongation characteristics and consequent embrittlement for the conventional externally plasticized roofing membrane after aging. EXAMPLE 5 This Example illustrates fabrication of a roofing membrane using an ethylene/carbon monoxide terpolymer as a low temperature improvement agent, rather than chlorinated polyethylene, as used in the-preceding Examples. The following ingredients were utilized: Ingredient Parts by Weight Internally Plasticized Resin* 40.00 Ethylene/carbon monoxide/vinyl acetate terpolymer (ELVALOY 741 P brand) 10.00 Calcium Carbonate filler (ATOMITE brand) 15.00 Polyvinyl chloride suspension resin (SCC-608 brand) 7.00 Octyl epoxy tallate (DRAPEX 4.4 brand) 7.00 Titanium dioxide Pigment (R960 brand) 4.70 Acrylic process aid (K-175 brand) 3.00 Ba/Cd stabilizer (SYNPRON 1517 brand)- 3.00 Cycloaliphatic Epoxide (ERL-4221 brand) 3.00 Arsenical fungicide solution (VINYZENE BP-5 brand) 2.00 Antimony oxide flame retardant (CHEMTRON L brand) 1.50 Phosphite chelator (SYNPRON 1535 brand) 1.00 Dilauryl thiodipropionate 0.75 Butylated hydroxytoluene 0.75 Partially oxidized polyethylene (PE-190 brand) 0.50 Bis-stearamide lubricant (ADVAWAX 240 brand) 0.50 Fumed Silica (MS-7 brand) 0.30 <RTI ID=18.2> *as used in Examples 1 and 3. The above ingredients were milled on a two roll mill at about 1600C. to about 1700C. for about 25 minutes to form a film having a thickness of about 635 microns. The following physical properties were observed for the film: Property Result Tensile strength at room temperature 89.6 kg/cm2 (MD) Tensile strength after heat ageing (1300C. for 24 hrs. with 18 hr. recovery) 112 kg/cm2 (MD) Elongation at room temperature 298% (MD) Elongation after heat ageing 302% (MD) Elmendorf tear strength at room temperature 33.5/68.1 kg/cm (MD/CD) Elmendorf tear strength after heat ageing 50.4/80 kg/cm (MD/CD) Shore A Hardness (10 sec) 71 - 72 These data show good retention of tensile strength, elongation and tear strength after heat ageing of the film. EXAMPLE 6 This Example sets forth a process for making another preferred roofing membrane for use in accordance with the present invention. A clean blender running at low speed was used to blend, at 100 - 15.60C. for 15 minutes, the internally plasticized resin, calcium carbonate filler, antimony oxide flame retardant, PVC resin, butylated hydroxytoluene, dilauryl thiodipropionate, Ba/Cd stabilizer and titanium dioxide pigments described in Example 5 in the weight amounts shown in that Example. The cycloaliphatic epoxide, octyl epoxy tallate, arsenical fungicide solution, and phosphite chelator shown in Example 5, were then charged into the blender and mixing was continued for an additional seven minutes of mixing. The acrylic process aid, partially oxidized polyethylene, bis-stearamide lubricant, and fumed silica, in the amounts described in Example 5, were then added to the blender and mixing was continued for an additional ten minutes. The ethylene/carbon monoxide/vinyl acetate terpolymer shown in Example 5 was then added to the blender and the resulting mixture was mixed for ten additional minutes. The composition resulting from the above described procedure was conveyed to a Banbury blender where it was mixed at 165.60C. until a calenderable mass was formed This mass was then passed through an extruder to a four roll calender where it was calendered at 162 1770C. to form a film having a thickness of 686-737 microns EXAMPLE 7 Various physical properties, analogous to those in Example 5, were determined for the third roll and tenth roll of material (686-737 microns thick) obtained from the calendering operation described in Example 6: Third Roll: Property Result Tensile strength at room temperature 113.5/83.8 kg/cm2 (MD/CD) Tensile strength after heat ageing (1300C. for 24 hrs. with 18 hr. recovery) 135.3/122.3 kg/cm2(MD/CD) Elongation at room temperature 326%/322% (MD/CD) Elongation after heat ageing 332%/323% (MD/CD) Elmendorf tear strength at room temperature 33.5/97.6 kg/cm (MD/CD) Elmendorf tear strength after heat ageing 37.48.4*kg/cm (MD/CD) Shrinkage (after 6 hrs. at 800C.) -6.2%/0 (MD/CD) Tensile strength after exposure (800 hrs.) to UV light** 114.2 kg/cm2 (MD) % Elongation after expos- ure (800 hrs.) to UV light** 280% (MD) EXAMPLE 7 (cont'd.) Tenth Roll: Property Result Tensile strength at room temperature 92.0/69.0 kg/cm2 (MD/CD) Tensile strength after heat ageing (1300C. for 24 hrs. with 18 hr. recovery) 121.9/101.7 kg/cm2 (MD/CD) Elongation at room temperature 260%/313% (MD/CD) Elongation after heat ageing 322%/290% (MD/CD) Elmendorf tear strength at room temperature 22.8/81.9 kg/cm (MD/CD) Elmendorf tear strength after heat ageing 37.0/ > 98.4*kg/cm (MD/CD) Shrinkage (after 6 hrs. at 80%) -11.% (MD/CD) * the values indicated " > 98,4" were off the scale of the measuring apparatus. ** test performed using a UV/moisture cycle at 500C. in a QUV brand apparatus using ASTM G-53 test pro cedure. The preceding Examples, which illustrate certain embodiments of the present invention, should not be construed in a limiting manner. The scope of protection that is sought is set forth in the claims which follow.

Claims: What is Claimed: 1. In a roof structure which comprises, in cooperative combination, a roof support, a roof deck lying on the roof support, insulation and a roofing membrane, wherein the improvement comprises a roofing membrane which comprises a predominant amount of an interally plasticized vinyl chloride copolymer resin. 2. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the internally plasticized resin comprises from about 25% to about 75%, by weight of the membrane. 3. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the membrane also comprises chlorinated polyethylene in a lesser amount than that of the internally plasticized resin. 4. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 3 wherein the chlorinated polyethylene comprises from about 5% to about 40%, by weight of the membrane. 5. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the internally plasticized resin comprises from about 50% to about 85% by weight vinyl chloride, from about 3% to about 47% of a C6-C,O alkyl acrylate, and from about 47% to about 3%, by weight of a bis (hydrocarbyl) vinylphosphonate. 6. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the internally plasticized vinyl chloride copolymer comprises from about 55% to about 80%, by weight, vinyl chloride, from about 10% to about 35%, by weight, 2ethylhexyl acrylate, and from about 5% to about 25%, by weight, bis (beta-chloroethyl)vinylphosphonate. 7. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 3 wherein the chlorinated polyethylene has a chlorine content of from about 25% to about 48%, by weight. 8. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the internally plasticized vinyl chloride copolymer is present at from about 25% to about 75%, by weight, and chlorinated polyethylene is also present at from about 5% to about 40%, by weight of the membrane. 9. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 8 wherein the chlorinated polyethylene has a chlorine content of from about 36% to about 42%, by weight. 10. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 8 in which the vinyl chloride copolymer comprises from about 55% to about 80%, by weight, vinyl chloride, from about 10% to about 35%, by weight, of a C6-C10 alkyl acrylate, and from about 5% to about 25%, by weight, of a bis (hydrocarbyl)vinylphosphonate. 11. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 9 in which the vinyl chloride copolymer comprises from about 55% to about 80%, by weight, vinyl chloride, from about 10% to about 35%, by weight, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, and from about 5% to about 25%, by weight, bis(beta-chloroethyl)vinylphosphonate. 12. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the membrane also comprises an ethylene/carbon monoxide terpolymer in a lesser amount than that of the internally plasticized resin. 13. A roof structure as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the internally plasticized resin is present at from about 25% to about 75%, by weight of the membrane, and an ethylene/carbon monoxide/vinyl acetate terpolymer is present at from about 20% to about 50%, by weight of the membrane

Inventors: GOSWAMI, JAGADISH CHANDRA, GRIMES, WHITEFORD DUNCAN, HORNIBROOK, WALTER JOHN
Applicants: STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY
Application year: 1984
Main classification: E04D5
IPC codes: E04D5, C08L23, C08L27, C08L73, C08J5, C08F214