CATALYTIC CRACKING CATALYST AND PROCESS

Abstract: Catalytic cracking catalysts, the process of their preparation and the process of their use.

Description: CATALYTIC CRACKING CATALYST AND PROCESS Field of the Invention The present invention relates to cracking catalysts derived from novel zeolitic aluminosilicates set forth in copending U.S. Serial No. 315,853, filed October 28, 1981 and to the process of their use. Background of the Invention The prior art dealing with catalytic cracking catalysts is voluminous with a basic goal being the preparation of modified zeolites for use as cracking catalysts. The following patents are representative of the prior art. The use of conversion catalysts formed from a zeolite dispersed in a siliceous matrix has been disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,140,249 and U.S. Pat. No. 3,352,796. Tne use of blended matrix components, e.g., a catalyst comprising a zeolite, an inorganic oxide matrix and inert fines, which may be alpha lumina, is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,312,615. Catalysts comprising an amorphous silica-alumina, separately added alumina and a zeolite are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,542,670 and catalyst comprising a zeolite, an amorphous hydrous alumina and alumina monohydrate are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,428,550. It has been disclosed that the steam and thermal stability of zeolites can be improved by the use of zeolites having a low level of alkali metal content and a unit cell size less than about 24.45 Angstroms (See: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,293,192 and Re. 28,629 (Reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 3,402,996)). Further, it has been disclosed (U.S. Pat. No. 3,591,488) that the hydrogen or ammonium form of a zeolite may be treated with H2 at a temperature ranging from about 8000 to about 15000F., and then subsequently cation exchange the steam and water treated zeolite with cations which may be rare earth metal cations. The method increases the silica to alumina mole ratio of the zeolite and also the defect structure. U.S. Pat. NO. 3,676,368 discloses a rare earth exchanged-hydrogen faujasite containing from 6 to 14 percent rare earth oxides. U.S. Pat. No. 3,957,623 discloses a rare earth exchanged zeolite having a total of 1 to 10 weight percent rare earth metal oxide. U.S. Pat. No. 3,607,043 discloses a process for preparing a zeolite having a rare earth content of 0.3 to 10 weight percent. U.S. Pat. No. 4,036,739 discloses hydrothermally stable and ammonia stable Y zeolite in which a sodium Y zeolite is ion exchanged to partially-exchange sodium ions for ammonium ions, followed by steam calcination and a further ion exchange with ammonium to reduce the final sodium oxide content to below 1 weight percent, followed by calcination of the reexchanged product, or according to U.S. Pat. No. 3,781,199, the second calcination may be conducted after the zeolite is admixed with a refractory oxide. Summary of the Invention The process for the catalytic cracking of a crude oil derived feedstock to produce lower boiling hydrocarbons which comprises contacting said feedstock with a zeolitic aluminosilicate which has a mole ratio of oxide in the dehydrated state of (0.85-1.1)M2/nO:Al2O3: x SiO2 wherein M is a cation having a valence of "n"; x has a value greater than 6; having a X-ray powder -diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings -of Table A; having extraneous silicon atoms in the crystal lattice in the form of framework SiO4 tetrahedra, wherein said aluminosilicate has been heated for an effective temperature and for effective time in the presence of an effective amount of steam and/or has been ion-exchanged with at least one multivalent cation as hereinafter described. Detailed Description of the Invention The present invention relates to new catalytic cracking catalysts, their method of preparation and to the process of their use in catalytic cracking processes. The catalytic cracking catalysts of the instant invention are derived from a novel dass of zeolitic aluminosilicates denominated LZ-210 in copending U.S. Serial No. 315,853, filed October 2b, 1981, said application being incorporated herein by reference thereto. It has been discovered that LZ-210 may be treated, e.g., hydrothermal treatment and/or ion-exchange with a multivalent cation, preferably rare earth cation's, to give catalytic cracking catalysts which have improved catalytic activity and selectivity to desired lower boiling hydrocarbon products. The catalysts of the present invention will be referred to herein, solely for the purpose of reference herein, as (1) LZ-210-T and (2) LZ-210-M to denominate, respectively (1) an LZ-210 catalyst which has been subjected to a thermal treatment, including a hydrothermal treatment, and (2) an LZ-210 catalyst which has been subjected to a treatment with a multivalent cation and, optionally, thermal treatment. Other components may be provided with LZ-210-T and LZ-210-M to provide the final catalytic cracking catalyst and exemplary of such other components will be discussed hereinafter. LZ-210-T and LZ-210-M are prepared using LZ-210 as described in U.S. Serial No. 315,853, above mentioned with a general description of LZ-210 being as follows: LZ-210 Aluminosilicates having in the denydrated state, a chemical composition expressed in terms of mole ratios of oxides as (0.85 - 1.1) M2/n O : A12 3 x SiO2 wherein "M" is a cation having the valence "n"; and "x" has a value greater than 6; having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings set forth in Table A, below; and having extraneous silicon atoms in its crystal lattice in the form of SiO4 tetrahedra, preferably in an average amount of at least 1.0 per 10,000A3. For purposes of reference herein the framework composition is best expressed in terms of mole fractions of framework tetrahedra T02. The starting zeolite may be expressed as: (Ala Sib #z)O2 whereas "a* is the mole fraction of aluminum tetrahedra in the framework; "b" is the mole fraction of silicon tetrahedra in the framework; z denotes defect sites and "z" is the mole fraction of defect sites in the zeolite framework. In many cases the "z" value for the starting zeolite is zero and the defect sites are simply eliminated from the expression. Numerically the sum of the values a + b + z = 1. The zeolite product of the fluorosilicate treatment, expressed in terms of mole fraction of framework tetrahedra (T02) will have the form [Al(a-N) Sib+(N-#z) #z]O2 wherein: "N" is defined as the mole fraction of aluminum tetrahedra removed from the framework dur ing the treatment; "a" is the mole fraction of aluminum tetrahedra present in the framework of the starting zeolite; "b" is the mole fraction of silicon tetrahedra present in the framework of the starting zeolite; "z" is the mole fraction of defect sites in the framework; (N-bz) is the mole fraction increase in silicon tetrahedra resulting from the fluoro-silicate treatment; \Sz" is the net change in the mole fraction of defect sites in the zeolite framework resulting from the treatment #z = z (product zeolite) - z (starting zeolite) The term "Defect Structure Factor" for any given zeolite is equivalent to the "z" value of the zeolite. The net change in Defect Structure Factors between the starting zeolite and the product zeolite is equivalent to "z". Numerically, the sum of the values: (a-N) + [b + (N-z)] + z = 1 A subclass of the above LZ-210 compositions, i.e. those which are characterized by having both high molar SiO2/A1203 ratios and low Defect Structure Factors (as hereinafter discussed), can be defined as having a chemical composition expressed in terms of mole fractions of framework tetrahedra as: [Al(a-N) Sib+(N-#z) #z]O2 wherein: the mole fraction of aluminum removed from the framework of the starting zeolite is "N"; b+(N-az) has a value greater than 6; the change in a-N defect structure factor #z is less than 0.08 and preferably less than 0.05; an increased silicon content in the framework, (N-oz), of at least 0.5; and a cation equivalent N expressed as a monovalent cation species, M+/Al, from 0.85 to 1.1 and the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite Y as indicated by' an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings set forth broadly in Table A. TABLE A d(A) Intensity 14.3 -13.97 very strong 8.71- 8.55 medium 7.43- 7.30 medium 5.66- 5.55 strong 4.75- 4.66 medium 4.36- 4.28 medium 3.75- 3.69 strong 3.30- 3.23 strong 2.85- 2.79 strong Zeolite LZ-210 as defined above will have cubic unit cell dimension, ao, of less than 24.61 Angstroms, preferably from 24.20 to 24.61 Angstroms and, an adsorption capacity for water vapor at 250C and 4.6 Torr water vapor pressure of at least 20 weight percent based on the anhydrous weight of the zeolite, and preferably an oxygen adsorption capacity at 100 Torr and -1830C of at least 25 weight percent. LZ-210 can be prepared by a method which removes framework aluminum from a zeolite having SiO2/A1 203 molar ratios of about 3 or greater and substituting therefor silicon from a source extraneous to the starting zeolite. By such a procedure it is possible to create more highly siliceous zeolite species which have the same crystal structure as would result by direct synthesis if such synthesis method were known. The process disclosed in copending U.S. Serial No. 315,853 comprises contacting a crystalline zeolite having pore diameters of at least about 3 Angstroms and having a molar SiO2/A1203 ratio of at least 3, with a fluorosilicate salt, preferably in an amount of at least 0.0075 moles per 100 grams of zeolite starting material, said fluorosilicate salt being in the form of an aqueous solution having a pH value in the range of 3 to about 7, preferably 5 to about 7, and brought into contact with the zeolite either incrementally or continuously at a slow rate whereby framework aluminum atoms of the zeolite are removed and replaced by extraneous silicon atoms from the added fluorosilicate. LZ-210 can be prepared from a conventionally prepared zeolite Y which has a molar SiO2/A1203 ratio of less than 6 by using the above process to increase the SiO2/A1203 ratio greater than 6. A preferred procedure comprises: (a) providing a zeolite Y composition having a molar SiO2/A1203 ratio less than that of the final product; (b) contacting and reacting at a temperature of from 20 to 950C, said zeolite Y with a fluorosilicate, preferably ammonium fluorosilicate. The fluorosilicate solution, being in the form of an aqueous solution at a pH in the range of 5 to about 7, is brought into contact with the zeolite either incrementally or continuously at a slow rate such that a s-ufficient proportion of tne framework aluminum atoms removed are replaced by silicon atoms to retain at least 80 percent, preferably at lest 90 percent, of the crystal structure of the starting zeolite Y; and (c) isolating the zeolite having an enhanced framework silicon content from the reaction mixture. The starting zeolite Y composition can be synthesized by any of the processes well known in the art. A representative process is disclosed in U.S.P. 3,130,007. For reasons more fully explained hereinafter, it is necessary that the starting zeolite be able to withstand the initial loss of framework aluminum atoms to at least a modest degree without collapse of the crystal structure unless the process is to be carried out at a very slow pace. Accordingly it is preferred that the SiO2/A1203 ratio of the starting zeolite be at least 3.0. Also it is preferred that at least about 50, and more preferably at least 95%, of the AlO tetrahedra 4 of the naturally occurring or as-synthesized zeolite are present in the starting zeolite. Most advantageously the starting zeolite contains as many as possible of its original AlO4 tetrahedra, i.e. has not been subjected to any post-formation treatment which either extensively removes aluminum atoms from their original framework sites or converts them from the normal conditions of 4-fold coordination with oxygen. The cation population of the starting zeolite is not a critical factor insofar as substitution of silicon for framework aluminum is concerned, but since the substitution mechanism involves the in situ formation of salts of at least some of the zeolitic cations, it is advantageous that these salts be water-soluble to a substantial degree to facilitate their removal from the silica-enriched zeolite product. It is found that ammonium cations for the most soluble salt in this regard and it is accordingly preferred that at least 50 percent, most preferably 85 or more percent, of the zeolite cations be ammonium cations. Sodium and potassium, two of the most common original cations in zeolites are found to form Na3AlF6 and K3A1F6 respectively, both of which are only very sparingly soluble in either hot or cold water. When these compounds are formed as precipitates within the structural cavities of the zeolite they are quite difficult to remove by water washing. Their removal, moreover, is important if thermal stability of the zeolite product is desired since the substantial amounts of fluoride can cause crystal collapse at temperatures as low as 5000C. The fluorosilicate salt used as the aluminum extractant and also as the source of extraneous silicon which is inserted into the zeolite structure in place of the extracted aluminum can be any of the fluorosilicate salts having the general formula (A) 2/bSiF6 wherein A is preferably a metallic or non-metallic cation other than H+ having the valence "b". Cations represented by wA" are alkylammonium, NH+4, H+, Mg++, Li+, Na+, K+, Ba++, Cd++, Cu+, Cu++, Ca++, Cs+, Fe++, Co++, Pb++, Mn++, Rb+, Ag+, Sr++, Tl+ and Zn++. The ammonium cation form of the fluorosilicate is highly preferred because of its substantial solubility in water and also because the ammonium cations form water soluble by-product salts upon reaction with the zeolite, nahmely (NH4)3A1F6. In certain respects, the manner in which the fluorosilicate and starting zeolite are brought into contact and the overall process of substituting silicon for aluminum in the zeolite framework is a two step process in which the aluminum extraction step will, unless controlled, proceed very rapidly while the silicon insertion is relatively very slow. If dealumination becomes too extensive without silicon substitution, the crystal structure becomes seriously degraded and ultimately collapses. While we do not wish to be bound by any particular theory, it appears that the fluoride ion is the agent for the extraction of framework aluminum in accordance with the equation EMI11.1 <tb> <SEP> NH4 <tb> <SEP> o <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> NH4+ <tb> (NH4)2SiF6 <SEP> (soln) <SEP> + <SEP> Al <SEP> Si <SEP> + <SEP> (NH6) <SEP> 3A1F <SEP> (soln) <tb> <SEP> , <SEP> , <SEP> NH4)3AlF6 <tb> <SEP> oo <SEP> oo <tb> Zeolite Zeolite It is, therefore, essential that the initial dealumination step be inhibited and the silicon insertion step be promoted to achieve the desired zeolite product. It is found that the various zeolite species have varying degrees of resistance toward degradation as a consequence of framework aluminum extraction without silicon substitution. In general the rate of aluminum extraction is decreased as the pH of the fluorosilicate solution in contact with the zeolite is increased within the range of- 3 to 7, and as the concentration of the fluorosilicate in the reaction system is decreased. Also increasing the reaction temperature tends to increase the rate of silicon substitution. Whether it is necessary or desirable to buffer the reaction system or strictly limit the fluorosilicate concentration is readily determined for each zeolite species by routine observation. Theoretically, there is no lower limit for the concentration of fluorosilicate salt in the aqueous solution employed, provided of course the pH of the solution is high enough to avoid undue destructive acidic attack on the zeolite structure apart from the intended reaction with the fluorosilicate. Very slow rates of addition of fluorosilicate salts insure that adequate time is permitted for the insertion of silicon as a framework substitute for extracted aluminum before excessive aluminum extraction occurs with consequent collapse of the crystal structure. Practical commercial considerations, however, require that the reaction proceed as rapidly as possible, and accordingly the conditions of reaction temperature and reagent concentrations should be optimized with respect to each zeolite starting material. In general the more highly siliceous the zeolite, the higher the permissible reaction temperature and the lower the suitable pH conditions. In general the preferred reaction temperature is within the range of 50 to 950C., but temperatures as high as 1250C and as low as 200C have been suitably employed in some instances. At pH values below about 3 crystal degradation is generally found to be unduly Severe, whereas at pH values higher than 7, silicon insertion is unduly slow. The maximum concentration of fluorosilicate salt in the aqueous solution employed is, of course,interdependent with the temperature and pH factors and also with the time of contact between the zeolite and the solution and the relative proportions of zeolite and fluorosilicate. Accordingly it is possible that solutions having fluorosilicate concentrations of from about 10'3 moles per liter of solution up to saturation can be employed, but it is preferred that concentrations in the range of 0.5 to 1.0 moles per liter of solution be used. These concentration values are with respect to true solutions, and are not intended to apply to the total fluorosilicate in slurries of salts in water. As illustrated hereinafter, even very slightly soluble fluorosilicates can be slurried in water and used as a reagent--the undissolved solids being readily available to replace dissolved molecular species consumed in reaction with the zeolite. As stated hereinabove, the amount of dissolved fluorosilicates employed with respect to the particular zeolite being treated will depend to some extent upon the physical and chemical properties of the individual zeolites as well as other specifications herein contained in this application. However, the minimum value for the amount of fluorosilicate to be added should be at least equivalent to the minimum mole fraction of aluminum to be removed from the zeolite. In this disclosure, including the appended claims, in specifying proportions of zeolite starting material or adsorption properties of the zeolite product, and the like, the anhydrous state of the zeolite will be intended unless otherwise stated. The anhydrous state is considered to be that obtained by heating the zeolite in dry air at 1000C for about 1 to 2 hours. It is apparent from the foregoing that, with respect to reaction conditions, it is desirable that the integrity of the zeolite crystal structure is substantially maintained throughout the process, and that in addition to having extraneous (non-zeolitic) silicon atoms inserted into the lattice, the zeolite retains at least 80 and preferably at least 90 percent of its original crystallinity. A convenient technique for assessing the crystallinity of the products relative to the crystallinity of the starting material is the comparison of the relative intensities of the d-spacings of their respective X-ray powder diffraction patterns. The sum of the peak heights, in terms of arbitrary units above background, of the starting material is used as the standard and is compared with the corresponding peak heights of the products. When, for example, the numerical sum of the peak heights of the product is 85 percent of the -value of the sum of the peak heights of the starting zeolite, then 85 percent of the crystallinity has been retained. In practice it is common to utilize only a portion of the d-spacing peaks for this purpose, as for exaitiple, five of the six strongest d-spacings. In zeolite Y these d-spacings correspond to the Miller Indices 331, 440, 533, 642 and 555. Other indicia of the crystallinity retained by the zeolite product are the degree of retention of surface area and the degree of retention of the adsorption capacity. Surface areas can be determined by the well-known Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method (B-E-T). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60 309 (1938) using nitrogen as the adsorbate. In determining the adsorption capacity, the capacity for oxygen at -1830C at 100 Torr is preferred. All available evidence, to date, indicates that the above described process is unique in being able to produce zeolites essentially free of defect structure yet having molar SiO2/A1203 ratios higher than those heretofore obtained by direct hydrothermal synthesis i.e., no other process is known to date for preparing LZ-210 . The products resulting from the operation of the process share the common characteristic of having a higher molar SiO2/A1203 ratio than previously obtained for each species by direct hydrothermal synthesis by virtue of containing silicon from an extraneous, i.e. non-zeolitic, source, preferably in conjunction with a crystal structure which is characterized as containing a low level of tetrahedral defect sites. This defect structure, if present, is revealed by the infrared spectrum of zeolites in the hydroxyl-stretching region. In untreated, i.e. naturally occurring or as-synthesized zeolites the original tetrahedral structure is conventionally represented as EMI15.1 After treatment with a complexing agent such as ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid (H4EDTA) in which a stoichiometric reaction occurs whereby framework aluminum atoms along with an associated cation such as sodium is removed as NaAlEDTA, it is postulated that the tetrahedral aluminum is replaced by four protons which form a hydroxyl "nest", as follows: EMI15.2 The infrared spectrum of the aluminum depleted zeolite will show a broad nondescript adsorption band beginning at about 3750 cm 1 and extending to about 3000 com 1. The size of this absorption band or envelope increases with increasing aluminum depletion of the zeolite. The reason that the absorption band is so broad and without any specific absorption frequency is that the hydroxyl groups in the vacant sites in the framework are coordinated in such a way that they interact with each other (hydrogen bonding). The hydroxyl groups of adsorbed water molecules are also hydrogen-bonded and produce a similar broad absorption band as do the nest" bydroxyls Also, certain other zeolitic hydroxyl groups, exhibiting specific characteristic absorption frequencies within the range of interest, will if present, cause infrared absorption bands in these regions which are superimposed on the band attributable to the "nest" hydroxyl groups. These specific hydroxyls are created by the decomposition of ammonium cations or organic cations present in the zeolite. It is, however, possible to treat zeolites, prior to subjecting them to infrared analysis, to avoid the presence of the interferring hydroxyl groups and thus be able to observe the absorption attributable to the "nest" hydroxyls only. The hydroxyls belonging to adsorbed water were avoided by subjecting the hydrated zeolite sample to vacuum activation at a moderate temperature of about 2000C for about 1 hour. This treatment permits desorption an removal of the adsorbed water. Complete removal of adsorbed water can be ascertained by noting when the infrared absorption band at about 1640 cm 1, the bending frequency of water molecules, has been removed from the spectrum. The decomposable ammonium cations can be removed, at least in large part, by ion-exchange and replaced with metal cations, preferably by subjecting the ammonium form of the zeolite to a mild ion exchange treatment with an aqueous NaCl -solution. The OH absorption bands produced by the thermal decomposition of ammonium cations are thereby avoided. Accordingly the absorption band -1 -l over the range of 3745 cm 1 to about 3000 cm for a zeolite so treated is almost entirely attributable to hydroxyl groups associated with -defect structure and the absolute absorbance of this band can be a measure of the degree of aluminum depletion. It is found, however, that the ion-exchange treatment, which must necessarily be exhaustive even though mild, required considerable time. Also the combination of the ion-exchange and the vacuum calcination to remove adsorbed water does not remove every possible hydroxyl other than defect hydroxyls which can exhibit absorption in the 3745 cm 1 to 3000 cm 1 range.1 For instance, a rather sharp band at 3745 cm 1 has been attributed to the Si-OH groups situated in the terminal lattice positions of the zeolite crystals and to amorphous (non-zeolitic) silica from which physically adsorbed water has been removed. For these reasons we prefer to use a somewhat different criterion to measure the degree of defect structure in the zeolite products of this invention. In the absence of hydrogen-bonded hydroxyl groups contributed by physically adsorbed water, the absorption frequency least affected by absorption due to hydroxyl groups other than those associated with framework vacancies or defect sites is at 3710 + 5 cm 1. Thus the relative number of defect sites remaining in a zeolite product of this invention can be gauged by first removing any adsorbed water from the zeolite, determining the yalue of the absolute absorbance in its infrared spectrum at a frequency of 3710 cm 1, and comparing that value with the corresponding value obtained from the spectrum of a zeolite having a known quantity of defect structure. The following specific procedure has been arbitrarily selected and used to measure the amount of defect structure in the products prepared in the Examples appearing hereinafter. Using the data obtained from this procedure it is possible, using simple matnematical calculation, to obtain a single and reproducible value hereinafter referred to as the "Defect Structure Factor", denoted hereinafter by the symbol "z"r which can be used in comparing and distinguishing the present novel zeolite compositions from their less-siliceous prior known counter-parts and also with equally siliceous prior known counter-parts prepared by other techniques. DEFECT STRUCTURE FACTOR (A) Defect Structure Zeolite Standard. Standards with known amounts of defect structure can be prepared by treating a crystalline zeolite of the same species as the product sample with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid by the standard procedure of Kerr as describea in U.S. Patent 3,442,795. In order to prepare the standard it is important that the starting zeolite be well crystallized, substantially pure and free from defect structure. The first two of these properties are readily determined by conventional X-ray analysis and the third by infrared analysis using the procedure set forth in part (B) hereof. The product of the aluminum extraction should also be -well crystallized and substantially free from impurities. The amount of aluminum depletion, i.e., the mole fraction of tetrahedral defect structure of the standard samples can be ascertained by conventional chemical analytical procedure. The molar SiO2/Al203 ratio of the starting zeolite used to prepare the standard sample in any given case is not narrowly critical, but is preferably within about 10% of the molar SiO2/A1203 ratio of the same zeolite species used as the starting material in the practice of the process of the present invention. (B) Infrared Spectrum of Product Samples and Defect Structure Zeolite Standard. Fifteen milligrams of the hydrated zeolite to be analyzed are pressed into a 13 mm. diameter self-supporting wafer in a KBr die under 5000 lbs. pressure. The wafer is then heated at 2000C for 1 hour at a pressure of not greater than 1 x 10 mm. Hg to remove all observable traces of physically adsorbed water from the zeolite. This condition of the zeolite is evidenced by the total absence of an infrared adsorption band at 1640 cm 1. Thereafter, and without contact with adsorbable substances, particularly water vapor, the infrared spectrum of the wafer is obtained on an interferometer system at 4 cm 1 resolution over the frequency range of 3745 to 3000 cm 1. Both the product sample and the standard sample are analyzed using the same interferometer system to avoid discrepancies in the analysis due to different apparatus. The spectrum, normally obtained in the transmission mode of operation is mathematically converted to and plotted as wave number vs. absorbance. (C) Determination of the Defect Structure Factor. The defect structure factor (z) is calculated by substituting the appropriate data into the following formula: z = AApps) X (Mole fraction of defects in the standard) AA (Std) wherein AA (ps) is the infrared absolute absorbance measured above the estimated background of the product sample at 3710 cm ; AA (std) the absolute absorbance measured above the background of the standard at 3710 cm and the mole fraction of defects in the standard are determined in accordance with part (A) above. Once the defect structure factor, z, is known, it is possible to determine from wet chemical analysis of the product sample for SiO2, A1203 and the cation content as H2/nQ whether silicon has been substituted for aluminum in the zeolite as a result of the treatment and also the efficiency of ay such silicon substitution. The fact that the present process results in zeolite products having silicon substituted for aluminum in the framework is substantiated by the framework infrared spectrum in addition to the hydroxyl region infrared spectrum. In the former, there is a shift to higher wave numbers of the indicative peaks and some sharpening thereof in the case of the present products, as compared to the starting zeolite, which is due to an increased SiO2/A1203 molar ratio. The essential X-ray powder diffraction patterns appearing in this specification and referred to in the appended claims are obtained using standard X-ray powder diffraction techniques. The radiation source is a high-intensity, copper target, x-ray tube operated at 50 Kv and 40 ma. The diffraction pattern from the copper K alpha radiation and graphite monochromator is suitably recorded by an X-ray spectrometer scintillation counter, pulse-height analyzer and strip-chart recorder. Flat compressed powder samples are scanned at 20 (2 theta) per minute, using a 2 second time constant. Interplanar spacings (d) are obtained from the position of the diffraction peaks expressed as 2 theta, where 2 theta is the Bragg angle as observed on the strip chart. Intensities are determined from the heights of diffraction peaks after subtracting background. In determining the cation equivalency, i.e. the molar ratio M2/nO/A1203. in each zeolite product, it is advantageous to perform the routine chemical analysis on a form of the zeolite in which "M" is a monovalent cation other than hydrogen. This avoids the uncertainty which can arise in the case of divalent or polyvalent metal zeolite cations as to whether the full valence of the cation is employed in balancing the net negative charge associated with each A104tetrahedron or whether some of the positive valence of the cation is used in bonding with OH or H30+ ions. The preferred novel crystalline aluminosilicate compositions of the present invention will contain a chemical or molar framework composition which can be determined from the expression of mole fractions of framework tetrahedra previously described: [ (a-N)sib+(N-z)Oz] 02 wherein: the framework Si/Al ratio is determined by b+(N- z) a-n and is numerically greater than 3, the mole fraction of silicon tetrahedra substituted into the framework of the product zeolite (N-Oz) is increased by at least a value for (N-az) N which is numerically equal to or greater than 0.5, the change in Defect Structure Factor ss z is increased by less than 0.08 and preferably less than 0.05. Moreover, regardless of the Defect Structure Factor of any zeolite material which has been treated according to the present process, it is novel by virtue of having had extraneous silicon inserted into its crystal lattice and having a molar SiO2/A1203 ratio greater than heretofore obtained by direct hydrothermal synthesis. This is necessarily the case sine all other methods for increasing the SiO2/A1203 ratio of a zeolite crystal must remove framework aluminum atoms, and unless at least one of those removed aluminum atoms is replaced by a silicon atom from a source other than the crystal itself, the absolute defect structure content of the crystal must be greater than that of LZ-210. CATALYSTS LZ-210-T and LZ-210-M The catalysts of the instant invention are prepared by the treatment of LZ-210 having a SiO2 to A1203 ratio of greater than 6.0, and, depending on the exact nature of the catalytic cracking process, e.g. cracking of resids, preferably greater than 8.0. For a conventional cracking process the preferred SiO2 td A1203 range is greater than 6.0 and less than 8.0 and is correlated to the catalyst regeneration step to effect a process with improved catalyst activity and gasoline yield. The term thermal treatment" is employed here to denominate both a thermal calcination and a hydrothermal calcination (thermal calcination in the presence of steam). The thermal treatment is carried out at an effective temperature and time and when a hydrothermal treatment in the presence of an effective amount of steam, to provide an LZ-210 derived catalyst of the instant invention, referred to herein as LZ-210-T. The thermal treatment is typically carried out at a temperature in excess of 3000C for a period in excess of 0.25 hours and when the thermal treatment is a hydrothermal treatment it is typically carried out in the presence of at least about 20 percent steam by volume in air. The source of the steam is not important and may be provided from an external source or may be generated in situ at the temperatures employed for the hydrothermal treatment. LZ-210-M is prepared by ion-exchange or impregnation of LZ-210, which, optionally, has been subjected to thermal treatment, by contacting the LZ-210 with a solution of at least one multi-valent cation selected from the group consisting of cations of Group IIA, and rare earth cations selectea from the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium and mixtures thereof. As a result of ion-exchange of the Lz-210 (or LZ-210-M), at least one multivalent cation, e.g., rare earth cation, is ion-exchanged with the cations initially present in LZ-210. The multivalent cation is preferably present in an effective amount that removes at least about 2 ion exchange percent of the cations present in the starting LZ-210 material and is typically present in an effective amount greater than aböut 5.0 ion exchange percent and preferably between about 16 ion exchange percent and about 80 ion exchange percent. The catalysts referred to herein are prepared from LZ-210 materials having a silica to alumina ratio of greater than 6 and, depending on the cracking process greater than 8.0. For example, when the hydrocarbon feedstock to be cracked is a resid or a feed stock containing at least 10 weight percent resid, the silica to alumina ratio is preferably above 8.0 when the regenerator is operated at higher temperatures to facilitate the burn-off of the increased amount of coke formed by the presence of the resid. For a convention cracking process employing a hydrocarbon feed boiling between 4200F and 1100F the regenerator conditions are such that it is preferred to use an LZ-210-T or LZ-210-M having a SiO2/A1203 ratio greater than 6.0 and less than 8.0 by correlating the SiO2/A1203 ratio to the processing and/or catalyst regeneration conditions. The preparation of LZ-210-T and LZ-210-M can involve several steps including multi-valent cation exchange, thermal and/or hydrothermal treatment and other optional treatments such as ammonium ion exchange. The various processing steps employed to prepare a given catalyst are denominated herein by a shorthand notation where the following notations have the following general meanings: i) = thermal treatment at effective conditions; and ii) = LZ-210 has been exchanged with a multivalent cation; and optionally, the LZ-210 can be ion exchanged with ammonium cations. The above process steps can be employed in a sequential manner to set forth the processing sequences employed for a given catalyst and may be employed in any order for one or more times. For example, the designation "i), ii)" means that the LZ-210 material has been sequentially thermally treated and then ion exchanged with at least one multivalent cation. The process for the preparation of LZ-210-T and Lz-210-M generally comprises treatment of a zeolite aluminosilicate which has a mole ratio of oxides in the dehydrated state of (0.85-1.1) M2/nO:A12O3; x SiO2 wherein M is a cation having a valence of "n"; "x" has a value greater than 6.0, has an x-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings of Table A and having extraneous silicon atoms in the crystal lattice in the form of framework SiO4 tetrahedra by employing at one of the following steps of: (i) treating the aluminosilicate at an effective temperature for an effective time; and (ii) providing an effective amount of at least one metal rare-earth cation selected from the dass consisting of cerium, lanthanum, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium and mixtur es thereof. It is understood that in addition to steps (i) and (ii) that combinations of steps (i) and (ii) for one or more times in any order are within the scope of this invention. In addition to the above, the aluminosilicate may be ammonium exchanged either before or after either of steps (i) or (ii). The ion exchange step(s) (either ammonium or multivalent cation) is generally carried out by preparing a slurry of LZ-210 or LZ-210-T zeolite by adding about 5 to 15 volumes of water per volume of catalyst, after which a solution of a rare earth salt is added. The ion exchange is generally carried out at room temperature and the resulting solution is then heated to above about 500C and stirrea at this temperature for about 0.5 to 3 hours. This mixture is then filtered and water washed to remove excess anion present as a result of the solution of the ammonium or multivalent cation salt. The ammonium ion exchange step is preferably carried out by slurrying zeolite LZ-210 with between 5 to 15 volumes of water per volume of catalyst after which an ammonium salt is added to the slurry. The resulting mixture is typically heated to a temperature above about 500C for a period between about 0.5 to 3 hours. The mixture is filtered and water washed until excess anion from the ammonium salt is removed. The ammonium ion exchange process is typically repeated one or more times according to the above described procedure. Catalysts LZ-210-T and LZ-210-M are typically employed with an inorganic oxide matrix which may be inorganic matrices which are typically employed in any of the formulating FCC catalysts including: amorphous catalytic inorganic oxides, clays such as silica, alumina, silica-alumina, silica-zirconia, silica-magnesia, alumina-boria, alumina-titania and the like and mixtures thereof. The matrix may be in the form of a sol, hydrogel or gel and is typically an alumina or silica-alumina component such as a conventional silica-alumina cracking catalyst, several types and compositions of which are commercially available. The matrix may itself provide a catalytic effect or it may be essentially inert. The matrix may act as a "binder" in some instances although in some instances the final catalyst will be spray dried or formed without the need of a binder. These materials may be prepared as a cogel of silica and alumina or as alumina precipitated on a preformed and preaged hydrogel. The silica may be present as a major component in the solids present in said gels, e.g. present in an amount between about 55 and about 99 weight percent and preferably between about 70 and about 90 weight percent. The silica may also be employed in the form of a cogel comprising about 75 weight percent silica and about 25 weight percent alumina or comprising about 87 weight percent silica and about 13 weight percent alumina. The inorganic oxide matrix component will typically be present in the catalyst in an amount between about 20 and about 99 weight percent, preferably between about 50 and about 90 weight percent, based on the total catalyst. It is also within the scope of the instant invention to employ other materials with the LZ-210-T and LZ-210-M in the final cracking catalysts, including various other types of zeolites, clays, carbon monoxide oxidation promoters, etc. As above mentioned, the catalysts of the present invention may be employed with a matrix component and this may be an alumina component. The alumina component which may comprise discrete particles of various aluminas, preferably crystalline aluminas. The alumina component may be in the form of discrete particles having a total surface area, as measured by the method of Brunauer, Emmet and Teller (BET), greater than about 20 square meters per gram (Mê/g), preferably greater than 145 Mê/g, for example, from about 145 to about 300 M2 M /g. The pore volume (BET) of the alumina component is typically be greater than 0.35 cc/g. The average particle size of the alumina particles is generally less than 10 microns and preferably less than 3 microns. The alumina may be employed alone as the matrix or composited with the other matrix components having inherently less catalytic cracking activity than the alumina matrix component. The alumina component may be any alumina and has preferably been preformed and placed in a physical form such that its surface area and pore structure are stabilized so that when the alumina is added to an impure, inorganic gel containing considerable amounts of residual soluble salts, the salts will not alter the surface and pore characteristics measurably nor will they promote chemical attack on the preforrned porous alumina which could undergo change. For example, the alumina is typically an alumina which has been formed by suitable chemical reaction, the slurry aged, filtered, dried, washed free of residual salt and then heated to reduce its volatile content to less than about 15 weight percent. The alumina component may be present in the final catalyst in an amount ranging between about 5 and about 95 weight percent, preferably between about 10 and about 30 weight percent based on the total catalyst. Further, an alumina hydrosol or hydrogel or hydrous alumina slurry may be used in the catalyst preparation. Mixtures of LZ-210-T and/or LZ-210-M and an inorganic matrix are typically formed into a final form for the catalyst by standard catalyst forming techniques including spray-drying, pelleting, extrusion and other suitable conventional means. For example, one inch extruded pellets may be dried in air (1100C) and then, further dried in an air purge at a programmed temperature increase from room temperature to about 2200C over a 1.5 hour period, held at 2200C for about 1.5 hour and then heated to 4800C over a period of 1.5 hour and held at 4800C for 1.5 hour. Catalytic cracking catalysts may be prepared by any one of several conventional methods. One method of preparing such catalysts employing silica-alumina and porous alumina is to react sodium silicate with a solution of aluminum sulfate to form a silica/alumina hydrogel slurry which is then aged to give the desired pore properties, filtered to remove a considerable amount of the extraneous and undesired sodium and sulfate ions and then reslurried in water. The alumina may be prepared by reacting solutions of sodium aluminate and aluminum sulfate under suitable conditions, aging the slurry to give the desired pore properties of the alumina, filterring drying, reslurry in water to remove sodium and sulfate ions and drying to reduce volatile matter content to less than 15 weight percent. The alumina may then be slurried in water and blended in proper amounts, with a slurry of impure silica-alumina hydrogel. The LZ-210-T and/or LZ-210-M component may then be added to this blend. A sufficient amount of each component is utilized to give the desired final composition. The resulting mixture is then filtered to remove a portion of the remaining extraneous soluble salts therefrom. The filtered mixture is then dried to produce dried solids. The dried solids are subsequently reslurried in water and washed substantially free of the undesired soluble salts. The catalyst is then dried to a residual water content of less than about 15 weight percent. The catalyst is typically recovered after calcination. Catalytic cracking with the catalyst of the present invention can be conducted in any conventional catalytic cracking manner. Suitable catalytic cracking conditions include a temperature ranging from about 7000F. to about 13000F. and a pressure ranging from about subatmospheric to several atmospheres, typically from about atmospheric to about 100 psig. The process may be carried out in a fixed bed, moving bed, ebullating bed, slurry, transferline, riser reactor or fluidized bed operation. The catalyst of the present invention can be used to convert any of the conventional hydrocarbon feeds used in catalytic cracking, that is, it can be used to crack naphthas, gas oil and residual oils having a high content of metal contaminants. It is especially suited for cracking hydrocarbons boiling in the gas oil range, that is, hydrocarbon oils having an atmospheric pressure boiling point ranging from about 4200 to about 11000F. to naphthas to yield not only products having a lower boiling point than the initial feed but also products having an improved octane number. In addition, the instant catalyst can be effectively used in an FCC (fluid catalytic cracking) process wherein a carbon-hydrogen fragmentation compound (CHFC) employed in admixture with the crude oil feed. Such a process will be referred to herein as an FCC-CHFC process. The term "carbon-hydrogen fragmentation compound(s)" is employed herein to mean materials comprising a lesser number of carbon atoms than found in materials within the gasoline boiling range, preferably those materials containing 5 or less carbon atoms, that fit into any of the categories of: a) Hydrogen-rich molecules, i.e. molecules with wt. % hydrogen ranging from about 13.0-25.0 wt. %. This may include light paraffins, i.e. CH4, C2H6, C3H8 and other materials. b) i.e. a molecule whose chemical structure permits or favors the transfer of carbon-hydrogen fragments. This includes CH3OH, other low boiling alcohols such as ethanol, n-propanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, isobutanol, etc., aliphatic ethers, e.g., dimethyl ether, and other oxygen compounds (acetals, aldehydes, ketones). c) Secondary Reaction Products from materials in categories (a) or (b) above that are carbon-hydrogen fragmentation compounds themselves, or transfer hydrogen. This includes olefins, napthenes, or paraffins. d) Classes of materials which are structurally or chemically equivalent to those of category (c), noteably olefins, etc.; and e) A combination of any or all of the materials in categories (a) thraugh (d). The preferred carbon-hydrogen fragmentation compounds are methanol, dimethyl ether and C2-C5 olefins, with methanol and dimethyl ether being the most preferred. The terms crude oil feed" is used herein for the FCC-CHFC process and otherwise to denominate any full range crude oil from primary, secondary or tertiary recovery from conventional or offshore oil fields. "Crude oil feeds" may include any full range "syncrude" such as those that can be derived from coal, shale oil, tar sands and bitumens. The crude may be virgin (straight run) or generated synthetically by blending. It is generally desirable, however, to first desalt the crude since sodium chloride is known to be a poison for most cracking operations. Further the term crude oil derived feed is meant to include component parts of the crude which are generally employed as catalytic cracking feeds or potential feeds therefor and include: feeds such as distillate gas oils, heavy vacuum gas oils, atmospheric and vacuum resids, syncrudes (from shale oil, tar sands, coal), feed derived from hydrocrackers, hydrotreaters, cokers, pyrolysis processes and high boiling FCC product recycle fractions; and fractions boiling above the traditional end of the gasoline boiling range which generally includes compounds containing greater than about eleven carbon atoms and combinations thereof. Further, the FCC-CHFC process is believed to involve combination reactions which are believed to be effective, at least in part, in removing sulfur, oxygen, nitrogen and metal contaminants found in a whole crude or a heavy hydrocarbon portion thereof. The operation of an FCC-CHFC type process is generally carried out at temperatures within the range of 4000F. up to about 14000F. and more usually within the range of 7000F. to about 12000F. at pressures selected from within the range of below atmospheric up to several hundred pounds per square inch gauge (psig) but normally less than 100 psig. Preferred conditions include a temperature within the range of about 8000F. to about 11500F. and pressures within the range of atmospheric to about 200 psig and higher. The carbon-hydrogen fragmentation compound may be provided to the process in most any way so long as it is present when contact with the catalyst material is effected, i.e. in situ generation is suitable. In the preferred operation an FCC-CHFC process methanol is used in combination with a gas oil type of hydrocarbon charge stock. The weight percent of methanol in the hydrocarbon charge passed to the cracking or conversion operation will vary considerably and may be selected from within the range of between about 1% and about 25 percent by weight, it being preferred to maintain the ratio within the range between about 5% and about 20, based on the weight of the feed. However, this may vary depending upon the hydrogen deficiency of the high molecular weight hydrocarbon charge, the amount of sulfur, nitrogen and oxygen in the oil charge, the amount of polycyclic aromatics, the type of catalyst employed, and the level of conversion desired. It is preferred to avoid providing any considerable or significant excess of methanol with the charge because of its tendency to react with itself under some conditions. The FCC-CHFC process preferably employs a fluidized catalyst system at low pressures without the need for high pressure hydrogen gas. Such a system promotes the highly efficient contact of relatively inexpensive carbon-hydrogen fragmentation compounds with heavy, refractory molecules in the presence of high-surface area cracking catalyst. Intermolecular hydrogen-transfer interactions, e.g., methylating reactions, and catalytic cracking reactions are effected in the presence of fluidized catalyst particles and act to minimize problems aue to diffusion/mass transport limitations and/or heat transfer. The FCC-CHFC process can make use of the relatively cheap carbon-hydrogen fragmentation compounds readily available in petroleum refineries, such as light gas fractions, light olefins, low boiling liquid streams, etc., and, in particular, can employ methanol, a product which is readily available in quantity, either as a transportable product from overseas natural gas conversion processes, or as a product from large scale coal, shale, or tar sand gasification. It also can utilize carbon monoxide (in combination with contributors such as water or methanol), which gas is readily available from refinery regeneration flue gas (or other incomplete combustion processes) , or from coal, shale, or tar sand gasification. Highly efficient recycle of carbon-hydrogen fragmentation compounds can also be effected. The following examples were carried out to illustrate the instant invention and are not intended to be limiting thereof. Examples 1 to 4 Examples 1 to 4 are examples employing Reference Zeolites: Y, RE-Y LZ-210 and a zeolite of this invention, respectively LZ-210-RE. Reference Zeolite Y is a commercially available Y catalyst having a SiO2 to Al 203 ratio of 5.0 and is the zeolite in Example 1. The prefix or suffix wREZ is employed herein to denominate ion exchange of a zeolite with at least one rare earth cation. The rare earth exchanged forms are the zeolite employed in examples 2 and 4. LZ-210 was prepared according to the procedure of U.S. Serial No. 315,ei53 from a Y zeolite having an SiO2/Al203 ratio of about 5.0 to give an LZ-210 product having an sio2/A1203 ratio of about 6.5. Zeolites RE-Y and LZ-210-RE were prepared by ion exchange, with a commercially available rare earth chloride solution from Molycorp, Inc. and sold under Product Code No. 5240. The rare earth analysis of Code No. 5240 is: wt. % Ce 2.8 La 14.7 Nd 4.5 Pr 3.3 The rare earth ion exchange was carried out by preparing a slurry of about 200 grams of anhydrous LZ-210 in one liter of water and about 50 grams of the rare earth chloride solution. Analysis indicated that the rare earth content was about 5 to 6 percent by weight based on the oxide of the total weight. The slurry was refluxed for one hour, filtered and washed with water until essentially free of residual chloride. The resulting product was then dried. The catalysts of examples 1 to 4 were prepared by employing zeolites, Y, RE-Y, LZ-210 and LZ-210-RE and formulating each into a final catalyst by forming zeolite and alumina composites consisting of 15% by weight zeolite and 85% by weight alumina, based on the anhydrous. total weight. The composites were formed by mixing the zeolite with about 76% of the alumina component in a Hobart mixer and then adding thereto the remaining alumina in a petized form. The composite was then extruded to 1/16 inch extrudates, dried at 1000C and then calcined in dry air to 5000C. The extrudates were then sized (10-12 standard U.S. mesh) and hydrated. The finished catalysts were then heated in a furnace in static air to 7500C at the rate of 12-160C per minute. The extrudates were then contacted with 100% steam a 7500C for five hours and then cooled to 2000C. The extrudates were then collected and sized to 60-100 mesn (U.S. Standard) and tested as cracking catalysts. The catalysts were then evaluated by ASTM D-3907 for use as cracking catalysts. Example 4 shows that a catalyst prepared from a rare earth exchanged LZ-210 (LZ-210-RE) had a higher % conversion and higher % gasoline than the zeolites of examples 1 and 2 which were derived from zeolite Y and, similarly, had a high % conversion and higher % gasoline than the LZ-210 of example 3. The higher % Coke for example 4 indicates that the catalysts prepared from the zeolites of the present invention are more active than the catalysts prepared by the use of the zeolites of examples 1,2 and 3. TABLE I Exampleê % Conv.1,3 % Gasoline4 % Gas4 % Coke4 1 68.6 51.0 12.6 5.2 2 70.9 50.9 14.9 5.1 3 69.8 51.5 13.6 4.9 4 73.2 53.7 13.7 5.9 Ú evaluated by ASTM D-3907 ê examples 1, 2, 3 and 4 are the average value of triplicate determinations percent conversion by weight, based on converted feed 4 wt. % Gasoline = C5 hydrocarbons to hydrocarbons boiling below 420 F in product as weight percent of feed. wt. % Gas = hydrocarbons boiling below C5 in product as weight percent of feed. wt. % Coke = residue left on used catalyst after stripping as set forth in ASTM D-3907 as weight percent of feed. Examples 5 to 12 Examples 5 to 12 were carried out to compare LZ-210 and LZ-210-M wherein M is a rare earth cation. Examples 5, 8 and 11 are comparative examples wherein no rare earth exchange was carried out. Examples 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12 include a rare earth exchange carried out as in examples 2 and 4 with the weight percent rare earth oxide based on the total final weight of the rare earth exchanged zeolite being, respectively, 5.77%, 6.19%, 6.15%, 2.278 and 5.8%. Each LZ-210 was prepared from a Y zeolite having a SiO2 to Al2O3 ratio of about 5. Each zeolite was formed into a catalyst comprising the zeolite and alumina, extruded and dried to 5000C, as in examples 1 to 4. The extrudates were hydrated and then heated in static air to 7500C at the rate of 12 to 160C per minute. The extrudates were then contacted with an air/steam stream containing 23 percent by volume steam and heated to 8400C and held at this temperature for 17 hours. The initial heating procedure and in situ generated steam and the heating procedure at 8400C are simulations of the conditions experienced by a cracking catalyst in the stripper and regenerator portions of a commercial cracking unit. The above procedure employed for the instant catalysts and those in the following examples was a deactivation by a hydrothermal treatment to simulate a catalyst which has been employed in catalytic cracking. A deactivation procedure has been recommended by ASTM committee D-32 (subcommittee D-32.04 on Catalytic Properties) on Catalysts entitled Proposed Standard for Steam Deactivated of Fresh Cracking Catalysts," 4th Draft, Amsterdam, July 6, 1982, incorporated herein by reference thereto. The catalysts were then sized to 60/100 mesh (U.S. Standard) and tested by ASTM D-3907. The results of these tests are shown in Table II. Table II shows that improved yield to gasoline is obtained with LZ-210-RE as compared to LZ-210 having a similar SiO2/A1203 ratio. TABLE II EXAMPLE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SiO2/Al2O3 7.4 7.4 7.9 9.1 9.1 9.1 11.0 11.0 % ConversionÚ 72.5 71.0 71.2 73.9 71.5 71.3 71.3 71.6 % GasolineÚ 48.3 52.6 49.6 48.5 49.7 48.3 48.3 49.6 Ú% Conversion and % Gasoline are as defined in Table I EXAMPLES 13 to 16 Four zeolites were compared in examples 13, i4, 15 and 16. The zeolite of example 13 was a Y zeolite having a SiO2/A1203 ratio of about 5.0. Examples 14, 15 and 16 employ LZ-210 compositions prepared from a Y zeolite having a SiO2/Al203 ratio of about 5.0 and, respectively have SiO2/A1203 ratios of 6.5, 7.0 and 9.0. Each zeolite was rare earth exchanged, as before described, to give a rare earth content (based on rare earth oxide on total anhydrous weight of exchanged zeolite), respectively,of 13.6%, 8.9%, 10.7% and 9.9%. Each zeolite was formulated into a catalyst by use of a silica/alumina matrix with the composite containing 15 wt. % zeolite and 85 wt. % matrix. The composite was formed into extrudates as described in examples 5 to 12 except the extrudates were deactivated prior to testing as catalysts by heating the extrudates to 2000C in nitrogen (about 5 hours), heating the extrudates from 2000C to 7600C, and then heating at 7600C in 100% steam for 5 hours. The extrudates were cooled and then tested as above described in examples 5 to 12 by ASTM D-3907. The results of these tests are shown in Table III. The results show that under mild deactivation conditions that an LZ-210 having a SiO2/A1203 ratio of 6.5 provides superior yield to gasoline. The results in Table V show that this improvement in yield is related to a correlation of the deactivation of the catalyst, i.e., process conditions witn the SiO2/A1203 ratio such that at the more severe deactivation employed in examples 20 to 22, i.e., more severe process conditions, the SiO2/A1203 ratio for LZ-210 of about 8.4 showed superior yield to gasoline when compared to the zeolites of examples 20 and 21, having comparable SiO2/A1203 ratios. TABLE III EXAMPLE1 13 14 15 16 SiO2/Al203 5.0 6.5 7.0 9.0 % Conversion 69.3 72.2 68.0 65.8 % Gasoline 51.3 52.6 50.6 50.4 % Coke 3.6 3.2 3.2 1.9 Conversion, % Gasoline, % Gas and % Coke are as defined in Table I. Examples 17 to 19 Examples 17 to 19 were carried out to evaluate the hydrothermal stability of: (1) an acid washed zeolite Y; (2) an EDTA extracted zolite Y; and (3) LZ-210, respectively. The zeolites were ammonium exchanged to provide zeolites with similar Na2O contents. Each zeolite was steam deactivated by a procedure similar to that described in examples 5 to 12 except that instead of incrementally heating the zeolites the zeolites were placed in a hot furnace (8730C + 40C) in the presence of 23% + 2% by volume steam in air for five hours. The zeolites were then hydrated at room temperature (180C to 220C) for at least 48 hours. The percent oxygen retention, percent surface area retention and percent X-ray retention (XRD) were measured by the procedure described in U.S. Serial No. 315,853 for each zeolite. The oxygen capacity, surface area and crystallinity of the zeolites were measured before and after ule hydrothermal treatment and then teile oxygen retention, percent surface area retention and percent X-ray retention were determined; A higher over all retention, indicates the zeolite would be expected to be more stable towards the hydrothermal conditions found in catalytic cracking processes, accordingly and have a longer catalyst life. The "Average Retention" values in Table IV are most significant when compared with the cracking data in Table V which shows that LZ-210 gives a % conversion greater than 70 percent while having a high average retention, and, accordingly, improved catalyst life. TABLE IV Example 17 18 19 Sio2/A1203: 8.8 8.1 8.4 % 02 Retention: 49.2 26.0 47.9 % Surface Area: 45.9 19.4 46.6 Retention % XRD Retention: 54.2 19.3 57.9 Average Retention: 49.8 21.6 50.8 Examples 20 to 22 The initial zeolites described in examples 17, 18, and 19 were evaluated in examples 20, 21 and 22, respectively, by ASTM D-3907 by preparing catalysts employing the zeolites by the procedure described in examples 5 to 12. Table V shows that LZ-210 exhibited a high percentage of the products in the gasoline range at a % conversion of 72.8 percent. TABLE V Examplel 20 21 22 SiO2/A1203 8.8 8.1 8.4 % Conversion 65.9 74.4 72.8 % Gasoline 47.9 48.4 51.9 % Gas 13.0 14.7 15.4 % Coke 5.1 4.8 5.1 1 % Conversion, % Gasoline, % Gas and % Coke are as defined in Table I. Example 23 An FCC-CHFC process is carried out using a crude oil feed comprising a heavy vacuum gas oil in a cracking operation. The vacuum gas oil is characterized by the API gravity (6000F) of 20.7, an average molecular weight of about 400 + 10 and a boiling range between about 7000F and about 11000F. The carbon-hydrogen fragmentation compound is methanol and is present in an amount of 10 percent by weight. The catalyst is LZ-210-M (SiO2/A1203 of 6.8) and riser FCC unit after heating the catalyst to about 10000F + 200F. The hydrocarbon products show improvea selectivity to motor fuel (hydrocarbon) products by addition of methanol as characterized by the presence of hydrocarbon fuels boiling below the boiling range of the crude oil feed.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. The process for cracking a hydrocarbon feedstock to produce lower boiling hydrocarbons which comprises contacting said hydrocarbon feedstock with a zeolitic aluminosilicate which has a mole ratio of oxide in the dehydrated state of (0.85-1.1)M2/nO:Al2O3: X SiO2 wherein M is a cation having a valence of "n", "x" has a value greater than 6.0, has a X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings of Table A, has extraneous silicon atoms in the crystal lattice in the form of framework SiO4 tetrahedra and wherein said zeolite has been treated by employing at least one of the following steps comprising: (i) treating the aluminosilicate at an effective temperature for an effective time; (ii) ion-exchanging the aluminosilicate with at least one multivalent cation; and (iii) treatment with both steps (i) and (iii) with the proviso that steps (i) and (ii) be carried out one or more times in any order. 2. The process according to claim 1 wherein the aluminosilicate has been ion-exchanged with a multivalent cation selected from the group consisting of Group IIA, cerium, lanthanum, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium and mixtures thereof. 3. The process of claim 1 wherein "x" has a value greater than 6.0 and less than 8.0. 4. The process of claim 1 wherein the zeolitic aluminosilicate is defined as having a chemical composition expressed in terms of mole -fractions of framework tetrahedra as: [Al(a-N)Sib+(N-#z)#z]O2 wherein; b+(N-az) has a value greater than 6.0 a-N the change in defect structure fractor zu z is less than 0.08; an increased silicon content in the framework, (N-z), of at least 0.5; and a cation equivalent N expressed as a monovalent cation species, M+/Al, from 0.85 to 1.1 and the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite Y as indicated by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings set forth broadly in Table A. 5. The process of claim 4 wherein the change in defect structure , > z is less than 0.05. 6. The process of claim 4 wherein the cation equivalent expresses an multivalent cation species, M+"/A1, where n is 2 or 3. 7. The process of claim 4 wherein b+(N-#z) a-N is greater than 6.0 and less than 8.0. 8. The process of claim 4 wherein the zeolite aluminosilicate has been ion-exchanged with a multivalent cation from the dass consisting of cerium, lanthanum, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium and mixtures thereof. 9. The cracking process of claim 1 wherein the process is carried out by contacting a hydrocarbon feedstock boiling between 4200F and -about 11000F with the zeolitic aluminosilicate at a temperature between about 7000F and about 13000F, at a pressure between about 14.7 psig to about 100 psig. 10. The process for the preparation of a cracking catalyst comprising the treatment of a zeolite aluminosilicate which has a mole ratio of oxides in the dehydrated state of (0.85-1,1) M2/nO:Al203; x SiO2 wherein M is a cation having a valence of "n"; "x" has a value greater than 6.0 has an x-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings of Table A and having extraneous silicon atoms in the crystal lattice in the form of framework SiO4 tetrahedra by employing at least one of the following steps of: (i) treating the aluminosilicate at an effective temperature for an effective time; (ii) providing an effective amount at least one multivalent cation selected from the dass consisting of Group IIA, cerium, lanthanum, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium and mixtures thereof; with the proviso that steps (i) and (ii) can be carried out for one or more times in any order. 11. The process of claim 10 wherein the aluminosilicate is ammonium exchanged one or more times. 12. The process of claim 10 wherein step (i) is employed. 13. The process of claim 10 wherein step (ii) is employed. 14. The process of claim 10 wherein steps (i) and (ii) are einployed. 15. The process according to claim 1 wherein "x" has a value greater than 8.0. 16. The process of claim 1 wherein the aluminosilicate is heated at an effective temperature and for an effective time in the presence of steam. 17. The process of claim 16 wherein the effective time is greater than 0.1 hour. 18. The process of claim 17 wherein the effective time is between 0.1 hour and about 10 hours. 19. The process of claim 8 wherein the effective time is greater than 0.1 hour. 20. The process of claim 19 wherein the effective time is between 0.1 hour and about 10 hours. 21. The process of claim 1 wherein the zeolitic aluminosilicate is ion exchanged with at least one multivalent cation in an amount of between 16 exchange percent and 90 ion exchange percent. 22. The process of claim 8 wherein the zolitic aluminosilicate is ion exchanged in an amount between 16 ion exchange percent and 80 ion exchange percent. 23. The process of claim 10 wherein the step (ii) is employed and the multivalent cation is selected from the group consisting of Group IIA, cerium, lanthanum, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, luthetium and mixtures thereof. 24. The process of claim 10 wherein the zeolitic aluminosilicate is defined as having a chemical composition expressed in terms of mole fractions of framework tetrahedra as: [Al(a-N)sib+(N-oz) z102 wherein; b+(N-tz) has a value greater than 6 a-N the change in defect structure fractorA z is less than 0.08; an increased silicon content in the framework, (N-z), of at least 0.5; and a cation equivalent N expressed as a monovalent cation species, M+/A1, from 0.85 to 1.1 and the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite Y as indicated by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings set forth broadly in TaDle A. 25. The catalyst prepared by the process of claim 10. 26. The catalyst prepared by the process of claim 24. 27. A cracking catalyst comprising a zeolitic aluminosilicate having a mole ratio of oxides in the dehydrated state of (0.85-1.1) M2/nO : A1203 xSiO2 wherein M is a cation having a valence of "n"; "x" has a value greater than 6.0; has an x-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings of Table A; has extraneous silicon atoms in the crystal lattice in the form of framework SiO4 tetrahedra; wherein said zeolitic aluminosilicate has between about 5 ion exchange percent and about 80 ion exchange percent of the cations are selected from the group consisting of Group IIA cerium, lanthanum, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium and mixtures thereof. 28. The cracking catalyst of claim 27 wherein the value of "x" is greater than 6.0 and less than 8.0. 29. The cracking catalyst of of claim 27 wherein the zeolitic aluminosilicate is defined as having a chemical composition expressed in terms of mole fractions of framework tetrahedra as: [Al (a-N) Si b+(N-z) 0 z 2 wherein ; b+(N-az) has a value greater than 6.0; the a-N change in defect structure factorb z is less than 0.08; an increased silicon content in the framework, (N-Az), of at least 0.5; and a cation equivalent N expressed as a monovalent cation species, M+/Al, from 0.85 to 1.1 and the characteristic crystal structure of zeolite Y as indicated by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings set forth broadly in Table A. 30. The cracking catalyst of claim 29 wherein the change in defect structure # z is less than 0.05. 31. The cracking catalyst of claim 29 wherein b+(N-z) has a value greater than 6.0 and a-N less than 8.0.

Inventors: BEST, DONALD FRANCIS, LONG, GARY NORMAN, PELLET, REGIS JOSEPH, RABO, JULE ANTHONY, WOLYNIC, EDWARD THOMAS
Applicants: UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
Application year: 1984
Main classification: C10G11
IPC codes: C10G11, B01J29