IRRADIATION OF A POLYAMIDE COMPOSITION

Abstract: The present invention is an irradiated article made from a composition and of irradiating the composition. The com­ position comprises a polyamide and a hindered phenol having the formula: wherein: R₁ is methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3-10 carbons, R₂ is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3-10 carbons, x is from 2-6, n is from 2-6, it is recognized that when n is greater than one, the alkyl phenol groups can vary in structure, and Z is selected from the group consisting of alkylenes, arylenes, cyanurates, esters, amines, phosphorus, oxy­ gens, sulfur, amides wherein the basic amide structure is ---, and mixtures thereof.

Description: DESCRIPTION IRRADIATION OF A POLYAMIDE COMPOSITION BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to irradiation of a polyamide composition; more particularly this invention relates to irradiating a polyamide composition which contains a hindered phenol compound. The treatment of polymeric materials with radiation has been reviewed by Zimmerman, J., "In the Radiation Chemistry of Macromolecules" by Malcolm Dole, Academic Press, N.Y. 1973. Abramova et al., "Radiolysis and Radiation-induced Oxidation of Polycaproamide in the Presence of Some Antioxidants", European Polymer Journal-Supplement, 1969, pp. 511-515, Pergamon Press, England, reviews the stabilizing effect of secondary aromatic amines and substituted phenols on the radiolysis and radiationinduced oxidation of polyepsiloncaproamide. Of particular interest in this study was the use of a hindered or substituted phenol, 2,2'-methylene-bis4-methyl-6-tert-butyl phenol. This was included in a group of antioxidants used to prevent thermal oxidation of polyamides. The study was conducted using films of polyepsiloncaproamide which were 2 to 6 micrometers thick. The stabilizing action of the hindered phenol, 2,2'-methylene-bis-4-methyl-6-tert-butyl phenol was found to be less than a variety of other materials tried and the stabilizing action only at the limit of the accuracy of measurement. Presently medical devices, such as syringes, are sterilized using ethylene oxide. However, ethylene oxide is a suspected carcinogen, and it has been projected that its use will be phased out in the next several years. Sterilization of various devices is expected to be conducted by the use of high energy radiation. Devices to be sterilized include devices made at least in part of polyamides. It is also contemplated that articles to be sterilized will be packaged in packages made at least in part of polyamides. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention is a method comprising the step of irradiating a composition comprising a polymer, preferably a polyamide and a hindered phenol having the formula: EMI2.1 wherein: R1 is methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3-10 carbons, R2 is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3-10 carbons, x is from 2-6, n is from 2-6, it is recognized that when n is greater than one the alkyl phenol groups can vary in structure, and Z is selected from the group consisting of alkylenes, arylenes1 cyanurates, esters, amines, oxygen, phosphorus, sulfur, amides wherein the basic amide structure is EMI2.2 and mixtures thereof. Two preferred hindered phenols are: EMI2.3 wherein x is 2 to 6 and y is 2 to 10; EMI3.1 wherein x is 2 to 6 and y is 2 to 10. The method of the present invention is particularly useful in sterilizing the polyamide composition and/or articles made of the polyamide composition and in particular film. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention relates to the of irradiation of a composition comprising a polymer, preferably a polyamide and a hindered phenol. The hindered phenol has the general formula: EMI3.2 wherein: R1 is methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3-10 carbons, R2 is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl, or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3-10 carbons, x is from 2-6, n is from 2-6, it is recognized that when n is greater than one the alkyl phenol groups can vary in structure, and Z is selected from groups consisting of alkylene, arylenes, cyanurates, esters, amines, oxygen, sulfur, phosphorus, amides wherein the basic amide structure is EMI3.3 and mixtures thereof. The term "polyamide" used in the present invention is intended to include long chain synthetic polymers which have regularly recurring amide groups as an integral part of the main polymer chain, and hence, includes amide-ester copolymers. Suitable polyamides can be prepared by polymerization of a difunctional monomer or equivalently, its cyclized lactam (e.g., epsilon-aminocaproic acid or caprolactam, respectively) or by the reaction of a conjugate pair of monomers, for example, a diamide and a dicarboxylic acid (e.g., hexamethylenediamine and adipic acid), or a linear amino-aliphatic acid such as ll-amino undecanoic acid. Suitable polylactams can be produced by the polymerization of lactam monomers of the formula EMI4.1 where R is an alkylene group having from 3 to 12 or more carbon atoms, preferably from 5 to 12 carbon atoms. A preferred monomer is epsiloncaprolactam having 5 carbon atoms in the alkylene group. Lactam monomers in addition to epsiloncaprolactam include pyrollidone, piperdone, valerolactam, caprolactam, lauryllactam, etc. Also included are copolymers of two or more of the above or similar lactam monomers. Suitable diamines useful in the polymerization of polyamides include propanediamine, hexamethylenediamine, octamethylenediamine, etc. Suitable polycarboxylic acids include acids such as adipic acid, pimelic, suberic, sebacic, dodecanonic, etc. Also included are copolymers or blends of polyamides of the above two categories. Polyamides useful in the composition of the present invention preferably are polyepsiloncaprolactam, polyhexamethyleneadipamide, or mixtures thereof. Typically, the number average molecular weight of these polymers is between about 10,000 and about 50,000, preferably 15,000 to 40,000, and more preferably 20,000 to 30,000. This is because mechanical properties improve rapidly up to about 20,000 and processing starts becoming more difficult after 30,000. Polyepsiloncaprolactam or polyhexamethylene-adipamide suitable for use herein can contain a variety of terminal functionality. Preferred terminal functionality is that containing: (a) A carboxyl group attached to both ends of the polyamide chain; (b) A carboxyl group attached to one end and an acetamide group attached to the other end of the polyamide chain; (c) An amino group attached to both ends of the polyamide chain; and (d) A carboxyl group attached to one end and an amino group attached to the other end of the polyamide chain. In addition to the polyamides discussed above, polyamide copolymers are useful in the alloys of the present invention. For the purpose of the present invention polyamide copolymers include polymers having two or more different monomers. Useful copolymers include but are not limited to the copolymers of: epsilon-caprolactam, and hexamethylenediamine and adipic acid; epsilon-caprolactam and ll-amino undecanoic acid; epsilon-caprolactam and 12-amino dodecanonic acid; hexamethylenediamine and adipic acid, and ll-amino undecanoic acid; and hexamethylenediamine and adipic acid, and 12-amino dodecanonic acid. Polyamide copolymers also include block copolymers such as copolymers containing polyamide blocks and polyether blocks. Useful polyamides include amorphous polyamides. Included in the amorphous polyamide polymers are copolymers of caprolactam, terephthalic acid and bis(paminocyclohexyl)methane with terephthalic acid or isophthalic acid. Useful amorphous polyamide copolymers are those disclosed in U.S. Serial No. 336,976, filed January 4, 1982. A preferred copolymer contains 90 mol percent caprolactam, 5 mol percent terephthalic acid and 5 mol percent bis(p-aminocyclohexyl) methane. Typical amorphous polyamide copolymers include Amidele transparent nylon sold by Union Carbide; clear nylon 6 sold by Dynamit Nobel Chemikaliens; Transparent Polyamide 55t with aliphatic, cycloaliphatic acid and aromatic basic components sold by Emser Industries; and Durethan" transparent polyamide containing isophorone diamine and isophthalic acid. The composition of the present invention includes the hindered phenol as described above. There can be up to 10 percent, preferably 0.01 to 10 percent, more preferably 0.02 to 3 percent, and most preferably 0.1 to 0.5 of the hindered phenol. Useful hindered phenols which come within the above-noted formula are described in U.S. Patent No. 3,644,482 and U.S. Patent No. 3,285,855 both hereby incorporated herein by reference. Two particularly preferred hindered phenols which are useful in the composition used in the method of the present invention include EMI6.1 wherein x is 2 to 6 and y is 2 to 10,preferably used in the form of Irganoxe 1098 which has the formula: EMI7.1 wherein x is 2 to 6 and y is 2 to 10, preferably used in the form of Goodrighte 3125 which has the formula: EMI7.2 The composition of the present invention has been found to be able to be irradiated by ionizing radiation such as gamma radiation, election beam radiation, and xray beams, and maintain its physical properties, including viscosity, tensile properties, and film toughness. The composition of the present invention can be irradiated prior to forming, or formed and subsequently irradiated. The composition of the present invention can be irradiated in any suitable form including extrusions, moldings, film, and film and sheet laminations. Examples of the irradiation of the composition of the present invention include incidental irradiation of polyamide packages containing articles to be irradiated. Typical of such packages are film packets containing medical related articles, such as syringes, to be sterilized by radiation. The composition of the present invention can be used to make molded articles such as medical equipment to be sterilized. Articles made of the composition can be used in environments where they are exposed to irradiation. The composition can be irradiated in an oxygen containing environment. However, it has been found that in the absence of oxygen the composition of the present invention maintains its properties to a greater degree than in the presence of oxygen. Properties which are particularly affected include the viscosity and toughness. The effects of oxygen can be observed by comparing film irradiated in sheet form where there is greater surface exposure to oxygen with film on a roll where the film in the inner wrappings of the roll is shielded from exposure to oxygen by the outer wrappings. Film laminates including coextruded films containing at least one layer of the composition used in the present invention are preferred materials for use in packaging articles to be sterilized. A typical film laminate is a coextruded laminate of having outer layers of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer sandwiching an inner layer of the composition of the present invention. This is particularly useful since the outer layers act as a barrier to oxygen reaching the inner polyamide composition. The radiation for use to irradiate the composition of the present invention is ionizing radiation such as gamma radiation, electron beam radiation, and x-radiation. The amount of radiation which the composition of the present invention can withstand depends on the configuration. In the form of a thin film, retention of properties is improved with doses of radiation up to 15 Megarads (Mrads), preferably 0.01 to 15 Mrads, more preferably 0.5 to 8 Mrads can. Most preferably doses of 2 to 5 Mrads is used in sterilization operations. Such operations can be for as long as necessary to sterilize. Typical conditions are 0.5 Mrads per hour. Preferably, the amount of radiation dose which can be used is up to an amount which will enable the composition of the present invention to maintain greater than 50 percent of its elongation as measured on a film according to ASTM Test No. D882 or ASTM Test No. D638. The radiation for use in sterilization processes is preferably gamma radiation by exposure to cobalt 60 (Co60 gamma rays). The exposure of polyamides to radiation results in the generation of free radicals on the carbon atom adza- cent to the nitrogen atom as discussed in Zimmerman, ibid., pp. 121-122. It is indicated that a variety of reaction sequences can subsequently occur. Reference is particularly made to Niman, M.B., Aging and Stabilization of Polymers, Consultants Bureau Enterprises, Inc., NY, 1965, p. 235; and Saunders, K.J., Organic Polymer Chemistry, Chapel and Hall, London, 1973, pp. 187-188. These references indicate that among the reactions which can occur in the absence of oxygen are chain cleavage and cross-linking. In the presence of oxygen a variety of cleavage reactions can occur. The presence of oxygen has been found to accelerate the cleavage reactions relative to the cross-linking reactions. The hindered phenols used in the method of the present invention are believed to intercept the peroxy radicals and reduce the cleavage reactions. Several examples are set forth below to illustrate the nature of the invention and the manner of carrying it out. However, the invention should not be considered as being limited to the details thereof. Irradiation experiments were conducted at Isomedix Corporation in Parsippany, New Jersey. Gamma radiation was used from a cobalt 60 (Co60) source. Dosimeters were used by Isomedix to measure the radiation doses. They were accurate to about i .2 Mrad. Samples were rotated every .5 Mrad (about every hour of exposure) to reduce non-uniformities of irradiation. The doses given by Isomedix are the minimum doses for each nominal value. For example, doses of 1.5, 3.0 and 5.0 Mrads are minimum doses with the maximum dose as much as +10% of the nominal value. The nylon used in the examples of the present invention was polyepsiloncaprolactam (Nylon 6). The nylon was irradiated in two different ways. The first or roll method was to irradiate the nylon while it was on the wind-up roll. Except for the very outer layers of the roll, this method resulted in irradiation under conditions of minimal exposure to oxygen. The second or sheet method of radiation was conducted on 8-1/2" x 11" (21.59 cm x 27.94 cm) film sheets which had been cut from the roll. The films were placed between sheets of white paper, placed in envelopes (between 10 and 50 sheets to an envelope) and placed in a large cardboard box for irradiation. The irradiation of film in this manner resulted in a much higher degree of exposure to oxygen from the air surrounding each individual film. The films were prepared from polyepsiloncaprolactam pellets which were mixed with an appropriate amount of stabilizer in powder form. The pellet and powder mixture was shaken to insure a fairly uniform coating of the pellets. The coated pellets were then extruded and cast to form films. EXAMPLES 1-2 Nylon 6 compositions were made by first extruding the nylon pellets which had been physically blended with the powdered stabilizer through a 1-1/2 inch (3.81 cm) Davis Standard Extruder with a barrel temperature of 5000F (2600C) to 5100F (265.60C), a die temperature of 5000F (2600C) to 5100F (265.60C), and a rate of 50 pounds (22.7 kg) per hour. The blend was then dried followed by reextrusion through a 2-inch (5.1 cm) single screw extruder with Zone 1 - 5100F (265.60C), Zone 2 5000F (2600C) Zone 3 - 5000F (260.00C), Zone 4 - 4800F (248.90C). The extruded film was fed to a quench roll at 1800F (82.20C) using a film die. The Nylon 6 has a formic acid viscosity of 75 and was sold as CAPRONe 8207F Nylon 6 produced by Allied Corporation. Comparative 1 was 100 percent Nylon 6. Example 1 was a blend of 99% by weight of Nylon 6 and 1% by weight of Irganox" 1098 having the formula: EMI11.1 Example 2 was 99% of Nylon 6 plus 1% of Irganox 1010 having the formula: EMI11.2 The compositions were formed into film which was 2.5 mils (5x10 -2 mm) thick. The film was 12 inches (305 cm) wide and 300 to 400 feet (91.4 to 121.9 m) of film were formed into rolls. Each roll had an outer diameter of about 5 inches (12.7 cm) and was on a 3-inch (7.6 cm) cardboard tube. The rolls were irradiated at radiation levels of 0, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 Mrads as discussed above. The effect of radiation on the viscosity of the film is summarized in Table 1 below. The reduced viscosity was measured in m-cresol solution of the polymer at a concentration C of 0.52 g/dL at 250C. The specific viscosity, nSp, was calculated from the relative flow times of sample solution and pure solvent minus one, i.e. [(t sample/tsOlvent)-l]. TABLE 1 Comp 1 Ex 1 Ex 2 Nylon (8207) wt% 100 99 99 Irganox 1098 - 1 Irganox 1010 - - 1 Viscosity &commat; 0 Mrad 1.83 1.84 1.85 1.5 1.71 1.71 1.73 3.0 1.59 1.56 1.56 4.5 1.58 1.57 1.56 The reduction and viscosity was not affected by the use of the stabilizer. The effect on physical properties on the films was studied. The tests were conducted according to ASTM Test No. D638 at 230C-50% relative humidity using Type IV test specimens. The Instron head speed was 1.0 in/min. All of the films were between 2.2 and 3.3 mils (5.6 x 10'2 and 8.4 x 10 2mum) thick. The results are summarized in Table 2 below. YE is Yield Elongation, YS is Yield Strength, BE is Break Elongation, and BS is Break Strength. Properties were measured in the Machine Direction (MD) and in the Transverse Direction (TD). TABLE 2 canp lmrad 13.2 (32819) (000) (kpa x 103) modulus Machine Direction PSI PSI PSI YE YS BE BS MODULUS (KPa) (000) (000) 3) (KPa) (KPax10 ) Coop 1 O Mrad 13.2 4760 340 10 163 (32819) (68.9) (1124) 1.5 13.2 4910 340 11 157 (33853) (75.8) (1082) 3.0 13.6 5090 310 9 183 (35094) (62.1) (1262) 4.5 11.0 5450 300 9 186 (37576) (62.1) (1286) Ex 1200 O Mrad 11.4 5210 350 10 205 (35922) (68.9) (1413) 1.5 11.4 5270 320 9 200 (36335) (62.1) (1379) 3.0 11.2 5320 330 10 199 (36680) (68.9) (1372) 4.5 10.4 5310 320 9 223 (36611) (62.1) (1538) Ex 2 O Mrad 14.5 4900 340 11 176 (33784) (75.8) (1213) 1.5 11.2 5150 330 10 199 (35508) (68.9) (1372) 3.0 11.9 5220 320 10 191 (35991) (68.9) (1317) 4.5 11.9 4870 340 10 182 (33577) (68.9) (1255) TABLE 2 (cont'd) Transverse Direction PSI % PSI PSI YE YS BE BS MODULUS (spa) ( s ) (000) 3 (kPa) (kPa x 10 ) Comp 1 0 Mrad 12.0 4580 340 10 168 (31578) (68.9) (1158) 1.5 10.5 4760 330 9 184 (32819) (62.1) (1269) 3.0 11.0 4770 320 8 182 (32888) (55.2) (1255) 4.5 10.7 5350 310 9 198 (36887) (62.1) (1365) Ex 1 0 Mrad 10.9 4350 330 10 172 (29992) (68.9) (1186) 1.5 9.6 4980 310 9 196 (34336) (62.1) (1351) 3.0 9.1 4840 310 9 214 (33371) (62.1) (1475) 4.5 9.1 5020 330 9 199 (34612) (62.1) (1372) Ex 2 0 Mrad 11.8 4430 310 9 147 (30544) (62.1) (1014) 1.5 10.1 5110 330 10 176 (35232) (68.9) (1213) 3.0 8.7 5130 320 9 220 (35370) (62.1) (1517) 4.5 9.9 4530 330 9 164 (31233) (62.1) (1131) Some changes were noted in the physical properties of the film upon irradiation up to 4.5 Mrads. There was about a 10% drop in Break Elongation and about a 15% drop in Tensile Strength at 4.5 Mrads. There was generally a slight improvement in Break Elongation and Tensile Strength when using the stabilizers. Toughness data was calculated for 2.5 mil (6.4 x 10'2 mm) film irradiated on a roll. The toughness is the BEssBSX106. The percent toughness retained is the average toughness retained for toughness in the machine and transverse directions. It is calculated by toughness at a given irradiation divided by toughness with no radiation times 100. The results are summarized in Tables 3 and 4 below. TABLE 3 Toughness (BEXBSX106) Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 Comp 1 MD 3.44 3.74 2.92 2.57 TD 3.50 3.10 2.67 2.67 Ex 1 MD 3.50 2.96 3.19 2.81 TD 3.31 2.71 2.66 3.00 Ex 2 MD 3.75 3.17 3.13 3.40 TD 2.90 3.23 3.03 3.05 TABLE 4 %Toughness Retained Mrad 1.5 3.0 4.5 Comp 1 99 81 76 Ex 1 84 86 86 Ex 2 98 94 98 The stabilized material had greater toughness retention than the unstabilized material upon irradiation. EXAMPLES 3-4 A series of films was prepared in the same manner as those in Examples 1 and 2. These films were irradiated on the roll with minimum oxygen exposure. The films were between 1.0 and 1.2 mils (2.5 x 10-2 and 3.0 x 10-2 mm) thick. Viscosity was measured in the same manner as in Examples 1 and 2 and is summarized in Table 5. TABLE 5 Comp 2 Ex 3 Ex 4 Nylon (8207) Wt% 100 99 99 Irganox" 1098 - 1 Irganoxt 1010 - - 1 Viscosity &commat; 0 Mrad 1.86 1.82 1.94 1.5 1.54 1.67 1.69 3.0 1.33 1.51 1.51 5.0 1.43 1.55 1.39 The viscosities of the Comparative 2 film having a thickness of about 1 mil (2.5 x 10'2 mm) were generally lower at 3.0 and 5.0 Mrads when compared to the 2.5 mils (6.4 x 10'2 mm) shown in Table 1. This may be due to slightly more oxygen exposure to the 1 mil (2.5 x 10-2 mm) film than the 2.5 mil (6.4 x 10-2 mm) film. An increasing viscosity at the 5.0 Mrad versus 3.0 Mrad suggests the cross-linking reaction at this point are increasing molecular weight faster than chain scission is decreasing the molecular weight. It is noted that there is a slight viscosity improvement at 1.5 and 3.0 Mrads with the addition of stabilizer. Table 6 below shows physical property data measured in the same manner as the physical property data for Examples 1 and 2 shown in Table 2. TABLE 6 Machine Direction thickness PSIX103 PSIX103 PSIX105 (mils) % (KPaxl03) % (KPax103) (KPax10 ) (mm) YE YS BE BS Modulus Comp 2 O Mrad 1.1 17.1 4.0 260 9.8 1.17 (2.8x10-2) (27.6) (67.6) (8.07) 1.5 18.0 4.8 250 8.3 1.44 (33.1) (57.2) (9.93) 3.0 14.0 4.7 220 6.9 1.11 (32.4) (47.6) (7.65) 5.0 16.2 4.5 230 7.2 1.27 (31.0) (49.6) (8.76) Ex 3 O Mrad 1.1 19.0 4.0 250 8.3 1.19 (2.8x10-2) (27.6) (57.2) (8.20) 1.5 15.5 4.6 280 9.1 1.38 (31.7) (62.7) (9.51) 3.0 17.5 4.6 290 9.6 1.37 (31.7) (66.2) (9.45) 5.0 15.2 4.6 280 8.6 1.38 (31.7) (59.2) (9.51) Ex 4 O Mrad 1.1 16.4 4.5 260 10.2 1.48 (2.8x10-2) (31.) 170.3) (10.20) 1.5 17.6 4.4 270 9.0 1.43 (30.3) (62.1) (9.86) 3.0 15.4 4.3 240 7.3 1.23 (29.6) (50.3) (8.48) 5.0 16.9 4.5 270 8.4 1.24 (31.0) (57.9) (8.55) TABLE 6 (cont'd) Machine Direction thickness PSIX103 PSIX103 PSIX105 (mils) % (KPaxl03) % (KPax103) (KPaxl03) (mm) YE YS BE BS Modulus Comp 2 O Mrad 1.1 14.5 4.0 270 6.8 1.36 (2.8x10-2) (27.6) (46.9) (9.38) 1.5 12.4 4.7 280 6.8 1.78 (32.4) (46.9) (12.27) 3.0 10.8 4.7 260 6.4 1.41 (32.4) (44.1) (9.72) 5.0 12.0 4.8 200 3.9 1.55 (33.1) (26.9) (10.69) Ex 3 O Mrad 1.1 14.1 4.1 260 6.4 1.34 (2.8x10-2) (28.3) (44.1) (9.23) 1.5 13.2 4.4 300 8.4 1.45 (30.3) (57.9) (10.0) 3.0 10.0 5.0 280 7.0 1.59 (34.5) (48.3) (10.96) 5.0 12.7 4.8 270 6.9 1.29 (33.1) (47.6) (8.89) Ex 4 O Mrad 1.1 11.5 4.6 270 6.5 1.63 (2.8x10-2) (31.7) (44.8) (11.24) 1.5 12.3 4.7 270 6.4 1.50 (32.4) (44.1) (10.34) 3.0 12.2 4.6 260 6.2 1.50 (31.7) (42.7) (10.34) 5.0 12.3 4.5 270 6.3 1.46 (31.0) (43.4) (10.07) There was considerable scatter in the physical property data due to the poor quality of the film in this test. However, the break elongation and break strength were generally improved by the addition of stabilizer. Toughness values were measured in the same manner as in Examples 1 and 2. Results are summarized in Tables 7 and 8 below, corresponding to Tables 3 and 4 of Examples 1 and 2. TABLE 7 Toughness (BEXBSX 106) Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 5.0 Comp 2 MD 2.5 2.1 1.5 1.6 TD 1.8 1.9 1.7 .8 Ex 3 MD 2.1 2.5 2.8 2.4 TD 1.7 2.5 2.0 1.9 Ex 4 MD 2.7 2.4 1.8 2.3 TD 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.7 TABLE 8 %Toughness Retained Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 5.0 Comp 2 90 77 54 Ex 3 133 126 113 Ex 4 92 78 90 In Table 7 the toughness values were generally poorer than the toughness values for the film of Examples 1 and 2. In Examples 1 and 2 the film tested had a thickness of 2.5 mils (6.4 x 10'2 mm) compared to 1 mil (2.5 x 10-2 mm) in Examples 3 and 4. It is noted that the film tested was of poorer quality. It is speculated that the poorer values may be due in part to the thinner films being more accessible to oxygen due to their higher surface to volume ratio. However, the addition of the stabilizer improved the toughness retention at all measured exposures in Examples 3 and. EXAMPLES 5-7 Polyepsiloncaprolactam sold by Allied Corporation as CAPRONe 8209 having a formic acid viscosity of 125, was evaluated in the stabilizer compositions of the present invention. In examples 6 and 7 the stabilizers used included Goodritew 3125 having the formula: EMI20.1 Example 7 also includes Weston 626 having the formula: EMI20.2 The compositions used and viscosity measured in accordance with the procedures outlined in Examples 1 and 2 are summarized on Table 9. TABLE 9 Comp 3 Ex 5 Ex 6 Ex 7 Nylon wtt 100 99.9 99.7 99.9 Irganox" 1098 - .1 - Goodrite" 3125 - - .3 0.05 Weston" 626 - - - 0.05 Viscosity &commat; 0 Mrad 2.49 2.36 2.43 2.45 1.5 2.16 2.19 2.32 2.22 3.0 1.93 2.07 2.17 2.15 5.0 1.95 1.85 2.16 1.73 Viscosity values in Examples 5-7 were maintained up to doses of 3.0 Mrads. At 5.0 Mrads it is speculated that the irratic results were caused by the competing crosslinking reaction. Physical properties were measured in accordance with ASTM Test No. D882 at a 20 inch (50.8 cm) head speed using a 2 inch (5.08 cm) gauge length. Measurements were only made in the machine direction. Results are summarized on Table 10. Toughness results are summarized in Tables 11 and 12 TABLE 10 Thickness PSIX104 PSIX104 (mils) % (KPaxl04) & (KPax104) (mm) YE YS BE BS Coop 3 O Mrad 2.3 14.5 .57 310 1.35 (5.8) (3.93) (9.31) 1.5 2.3 19.3 .58 310 1.28 (5.8) (4.00) (8.83) 3.0 2.4 18.7 .58 310 1.20 (6.1) (4.00) (8.27) 5.0 2.3 20.5 .58 310 1.24 (5.8) (4.00) (8.55) Ex 5 O Mrad 2.5 6.2 .79 440 1.30 (6.4) (5.45) (8.96) 1.5 2.5 6.0 .87 450 1.32 (6.4) (6.00) (9.10) 3.0 2.5 6.1 .88 440 1.21 (6.4) (6.07) (8.34) 5.0 2.7 7.0 .73 460 1.26 (6.9) (5.03) (8.69) Err 6 O Mrad 1.9 17.7 .60 390 1.18 (4.8) (4.14) (8.14) 1.5 1.9 9.4 .73 360 1.11 (4.8) (5.03) (7.65) 3.0 1.9 25.4 .51 420 1.39 (4.8) (3.52) (9.58) 5.0 1.7 22.0 .59 410 1.27 (4.3) (4.07) (8.76) Ex 7 O Mrad 2.0 7.5 .74 380 1.23 (5.1) (5.10) (8.48) 1.5 2.0 8.3 .68 360 1.09 (5.1) (4.67) (7.52) 3.0 2.0 9.6 .55 400 1.24 (5.1) (3.79) (8.55) 5.0 2.0 9.1 .66 400 1.24 (5.1) (4.55) (8.55) TABLE 11 Toughness (BEXBSxlO6) Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 Camp 3 4.2 4.0 3.7 3.8 Ex 5 5.7 5.9 5.3 5.8 Ex 6 4.6 4.0 5.8 5.2 Ex 7 4.7 3.9 5.0 5.0 TABLE 12 %Toughness Retained Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 Comp 3 95 88 90 Ex 5 104 93 102 Ex 6 87 126 113 Ex 7 83 106 106 Physical properties and toughness were retained when using the composition of the present invention. EXAMPLES 8-10 Examples 5-7 were repeated by substituting an amorphous terpolymer of caprolactam, 5 mol percent terephthalic acid, and 5 mol percent pamino cyclohexyl amine in place of the polyepsiloncaprolactam (Nylon 6). The composition and physical test results are summarized on Tables 13-16. TABLE 13 Comp4 Ex 8 Ex 9 Ex 10 Terpolymer wt% 100 99.9 99.7 99.9 Irganox" 1098 - .1 - Goodrite" 3125 - - .3 0.05 Weston" 626 - - - 0.05 Viscosity &commat; O Mrad 1.81 1.76 1.74 1.83 1.5 1.70 1.77 1.75 1.74 3.0 1.66 1.70 1.79 1.77 5.0 1.66 1.83 1.81 1.81 TABLE 14 Machine Direction Thickness PSIX104 PSIX104 (mils) % (KPaxlO4) & (KPax104) (mm) YE YS BE BS Comp 4 O Mrad 1.2 11.6 .44 310 .73 (3.0) (3.03) (5.03) 1.5 1.2 9.6 .49 310 .63 (3.0) (3.38) (4.34) 3.0 1.3 6.8 .53 290 .66 (3.3) (3.65) (4.55) 5.0 1.3 8.0 .48 300 .83 (3.3) (3.31) (5.72) Ex 8 O Mrad 2.9 3.8 .80 470 1.08 (7.4) (5.52) (7.45) 1.5 2.7 4.9 .74 490 1.04 (6.9) (5.10) (7.17) 3.0 2.8 4.7 .60 480 1.02) (7.1) (4.14) (7.03) 5.0 2.7 5.9 .69 480 1.00 (6.9) (4.76) (6.89) Ex 9 O Mrad 2.2 3.7 .81 480 1.28 (5.6) (5.58) (8.83) 1.5 2.0 4.5 .30 450 1.25 (5.1) (2.07) (8.62) 3.0 2.3 4.6 .41 480 1.20 (5.8) (2.83) (8.27) 5.0 2.1 3.4 .24 480 1.15 (5.3) (1.65) (7.93) Ex 10 O Mrad 1.4 4.9 .47 460 1.14 (3.6) (3.24) (7.86) 1.5 1.9 4.7 .89 480 1.12 (4.8) (6.14) (7.72) 3.0 2.3 4.4 .25 480 1.12 (5.8) (1.72) (7.72) 5.0 2.0 3.9 .54 470 1.17 (5.1) (3.72) (8.07) TABLE 14 (cont'd) Transverse Direction Thickness PSIX104 PSIX104 (mils) % (KPaxl04) & (KPaxlO4) (mm) YE YS BE BS Comp 4 O Mrad 2.3 10.5 .47 250 .58 (5.8) (3.24) (4.00) 1.5 2.3 10.9 .49 290 .64 (5.8) (3.38) (4.41) 3.0 2.4 8.0 .51 300 .67 (6.1) (3.52) (4.62) 5.0 2.3 10.2 .50 320 .74 (5.8) (3.45) (5.10) TABLE 15 Toughness (BExBSxlO6) Average Thickness in mils (mm) Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 Comp 4 1.3 2.3 2.0 1.9 2.7 (3.3) Ex 8 2.8 5.1 5.1 4.9 4.8 (7.1) Ex 9 2.1 6.1 5.6 5.8 5.5 (5.3) Ex 10 1.9 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.5 (4.8) TABLE 16 %Toughness Retained Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 Comp 4 1.3 87 83 117 (3.3) Ex 8 2.8 100 96 94 (7.1) Ex 9 2.1 92 95 90 (5.3) Ex 10 1.9 104 104 106 (4.8) It was found that the use of the stabilizer with the amorphous polyamide actually improved physical properties in addition to providing an improvement in retention of the physical properties upon exposure to radiatoin. EXAMPLES 11-14 Films made of the composition of the present invention were irradiated in sheet form. Between 10 and 20, 8 1/2 inches by 11 inches (21.59 cm x 27.94 cm) sheets were placed in an envelope. Each film sheet was separated by a sheet of white paper. Several envelopes were placed in a cardboard box which was irradiated. The films were made of Nylon 6 of the type used in Examples 1 and 2. The stabilized compositions used are summarized in Table 17 below. The stabilizers used were combinations of Goodritet 3125, described above, Tinuvin" 770 and Weston" MDW618. Tinuvin" 770 is bis 22-6-6-t-methyl piperridinyl-4-sebecate, and Weston 618 has the formula: EMI26.1 Compositions and viscosity results for the nylon films, which were 2 mils thick, are summarized in Table 17. TABLE 17 Comp 5 Ex 11 Ex 12 Ex 13 Ex 14 Nylon wt% 100 99.7 99.85 99 99.755 Goodrite" 3125 - .3 .05 - .095 Tinuvin" 770 - - .1 - Irganox" 1098 - - - 1 Weston" MDW618 - - - - .15 Viscosity &commat; O Mrad 1.90 1.92 1.89 1.96 1.90 1.5 1.63 1.68 1.63 1.72 1.58 3.0 1.46 1.54 1.43 1.54 1.45 5.0 1.31 1.39 1.30 1.44 1.33 Physical properties and toughness tests were conducted in accordance with the same procedures as used in Examples 5-7. Results are summarized on Tables 18-20. TABLE 18 Machine Direction PSIX104 PSIX104 (KPaxl04) % (KPaxl04) YE YS BE BS Comp 5 0 Mrad 13.9 0.54 320 1.35 (3.72) (9.31) 1.5 5.2 0.82 245 1.22 (5.65) (8.41) 3.0 5.2 0.78 250 1.07 (5.38) (7.38) 5.0 5.8 0.72 260 1.08 (4.96) (7.45) Ex 11 0 Mrad 12.3 0.57 325 1.60 (3.93) (11.03) 1.5 4.9 0.79 280 1.34 (5.45) (9.24) 3.0 7.1 0.73 255 1.06 (5.03) (7.31) 5.0 10.8 0.59 250 1.02 (4.07) (7.03) Ex 12 0 Mrad 12.7 0.60 290 1.41 (4.14) (9.72) 1.5 5.7 0.69 260 1.20 (4.76) (8.27) 3.0 5.8 0.71 285 1.28 (4.90) (8.83) 5.0 12.0 0.49 265 1.09 (3.38) (7.52) Ex 13 0 Mrad 9.7 0.63 270 1.22 (4.34) (8.41) 1.5 5.7 0.72 250 1.13 (4.96) (7.79) 3.0 5.2 0.80 250 1.08 (5.52) (7.45) 5.0 10.3 0.59 280 1.20 (4.07) (8.27) TABLE 18 (Cont'd) Machine Direction PSIX104 PSIX104 % (KPax104) % (KPax104) YE YS BE BS Ex 14 0 Mrad 12.3 0.58 300 1.39 (4.00) (9.58) 1.5 5.9 0.69 250 1.06 (4.76) (7.31) 3.0 5.7 0.71 260 1.10) (4.90) (7.58) 5.0 5.8 0.69 235 0.95 (4.76) (6.55) TABLE 18 (cont'd) Transverse Direction PSIX104 PSIX104 (KPaxl04) % (KPaxl04) YE YS BE BS Comp 5 0 Mrad 13.9 INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE 1.5 4.6 0.71 285 0.94 (4.90) (6.48) 3.0 5.2 0.74 290 0.74 (5.10) (5.10) 5.0 5.8 0.71 300 0.87 (4.90) (6.00) Ex 11 0 Mrad 8.7 0.65 355 1.10) (4.48) (7.58) 1.5 3.7 0.82 315 1.04) (5.65) (7.17) 3.0 5.1 0.75 320 0.98 (5.17) (6.76) 5.0 6.6 0.52 330 0.99 (3.59) (6.83) Ex 12 0 Mrad 9.7 0.56 350 1.17 (3.86) (8.07) 1.5 4.7 0.71 300 0.88 (4.90) (6.07) 3.0 5.5 0.78 300 0.79 (5.38) (5.45) 5.0 7.9 0.49 310 0.90 (3.38) (6.21) Ex 13 0 Mrad 9.1 0.59 370 1.25 (4.07) (8.62) 1.5 4.3 0.78 310 1.01 (5.38) (6.96) 3.0 4.9 0.49 300 0.82 (3.38) (5.65) 5.0 5.5 0.65 295 0.81 (4.48) (5.58) TABLE 18 (Cont'd) Machine Direction PSIX104 PSIX104 (KPaxl04) % (KPaxl04) YE YS BE BS Ex 14 0 Mrad INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE 1.5 4.6 0.78 320 1.03 (5.38) (7.10) 3.0 4.9 0.72 290 0.72 (4.96) (4.96) 5.0 4.8 0.75 305 0.82 (5.17) (5.65) TABLE 19 Toughness * ¯ (BEXBSX106) Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 Comp 5 4.32** 2.84 2.42 2.71 Ex 11 4.56 3.51 2.92 2.90 Ex 12 4.10 2.88 3.01 2.84 Ex 13 3.96 2.98 2.58 2.90 Ex 14 4.17** 2.98 2.48 2.37 TABLE 20 %Toughness* Retained Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 Comp 5 65 56 63 Ex 11 78 66 66 Ex 12 70 74 70 Ex 13 77 68 77 Ex 14 72 60 57 *Average of Transverse and Machine direction **Only Machine direction data available Generally physical properties of the composition in Examples 11-14 did not deteriorate to the extent that the unstabilized Comp. 5 deteriorated. EXAMPLES 15-17 In Examples 15-17 CAPRONe 8209 Nylon 6 was evaluated with various stabilizers by irradiation in sheet form as discribed above. The compositions used, the properties evaluated including reduced viscosities, tensile properties and toughness are summarized in Tables 21-24. The sheets were about 2 mils (5.1 x 10-2 mm) thick. TABLE 21 Comp 6 Ex 15 Ex 16 Ex 17 Nylon wt% 100 99.9 99.7 99.9 Irganox@ 1098 - .1 Goodrite" 3125 - - .3 0.05 Weston@ MDW626 - - - 0.05 Viscosity &commat; 0 Mrad 2.49 2.36 2.43 2.45 1.5 1.89 2.06 2.00 2.00 3.0 1.63 1.85 1.79 1.71 5.0 1.49 1.77 1.54 1.54 The viscosity of the composition of Examples 15-17 did not drop as much as the 100 percent nylon Comp. 6. TABLE 22 Machine Direction PSIX104 PSIX104 % (KPaxlO4) % (KPaxl04) YE YS BE BS Comp 6 O Mrad 14.5 0.57 310 1.35 (3.93) (9.31) 1.5 5.9 0.69 230 1.14 (4.76) (7.86) 3.0 5.4 0.82 230 1.14 (5.65) (7.86) 5.0 6.7 0.68 250 1.16 (4.69) (8.00) Ex 15 O Mrad 6.2 0.79 440 1.30 (5.45) (8.96) 1.5 5.2 0.74 290 1.26 (5.10) (8.69) 3.0 6.0 0.63 290 1.15 (4.34) (7.92) 5.0 6.2 0.63 290 1.18 (4.34) (8.14) Ex 16 O Mrad 17.7 0.60 390 1.18 (4.14) (8.14) 1.5 4.8 0.80 270 1.33 (5.52) (9.17) 3.0 5.3 0.76 250 1.20 (5.24) (8.27) 5.0 7.6 0.63 235 0.99 (4.34) (6.83) Ex 17 O Mrad 7.5 0.74 380 1.23 (5.10) (8.48) 1.5 5.8 0.71 305 1.56 (4.90) 10.76 3.0 5.2 0.82 245 1.13 (5.65) (7.79) 5.0 5.2 0.80 250 1.13 (5.52) (7.79) TABLE 22 (cont'd) Transverse Direction PSIX104 PSIX104 (KPaxl04) % (KPax104) YE YS BE BS Comp 6 0 Mrad 9.6 0.66 385 1.24 (4.55) (8.55) 1.5 4.7 0.70 300 1.00 (4.83) (6.89) 3.0 5.1 0.77 290 0.90 (5.31) (6.21) 5.0 5.3 0.71 310 0.89 (4.90) (6.14) Ex 15 0 Mrad 10.2 0.55 350 1.20 (3.79) (8.27) 1.5 4.8 0.78 325 1.19 (5.38) (8.20) 3.0 5.3 0.72 290 1.00 (4.96) (6.89) 5.0 6.4 0.58 310 1.02 (4.96) (7.03) Ex 16 0 Mrad 9.9 0.69 350 1.11 (4.76) (7.65) 1.5 4.6 0.82 315 1.00 (5.65) (6.89) 3.0 4.5 0.79 260 0.80 (5.45) (5.52) 5.0 4.7 0.74 320 0.95 (5.10) (6.55) Ex 17 0 Mrad INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE 1.5 4.9 0.78 340 1.18 (5.38) (8.14) 3.0 4.8 0.80 310 0.97 (5.52) (6.69) 5.0 4.8 0.75 260 0.86 (5.17) (5.93) TABLE 23 Toughness* (BE+BS+106) Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 Comp 6 4.48 2.81 2.62 2.83 Ex 15 4.96 3.76 3.12 3.29 Ex 16 4.25 3.37 2.54 2.69 Ex 17 4.67** 4.39 2.87 2.53 TABLE 24 %Toughness Retained Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 Comp 6 63 59 64 Ex 15 78 64 68 Ex 16 80 59 59 Ex 17 93 62 55 *Average of Transverse and Machine direction **Only Machine direction data available Physical properties of the stabilized compositions were better at 1.5 Mrad and comparable to the Comp. 6 at 3.0 and 5.0 Mrad. In Example 17 the positive affects of the hindered phenol are not apparent at the higher doses of radiation. It is speculated this is because the concentration of hindered phenol is approaching the lower concentration limits. EXAMPLES 18-20 In Examples 18-20 the nylon terpolymer disclosed in Examples 8-10 was evaluated in 2 mil (5.1 x 10-2 mm) films irradiated in sheet form. The specific compositions used as well as the viscosities is summarized on Table 25 below. Physical properties and toughness are summarized in Tables 26 and 28. Testing was conducted according to the same procedures as in Examples 5-7. TABLE 25 Comp 7 Ex 18 Ex 19 Ex 20 Terpolymer wt. % 100 99.9 99.7 99.9 Irganox@ 1098 - 0.1 - Goodrite" 3125 - - .3 0.05 Weston@ MDW626 - - - 0.05 Viscosity Q 0 Mrad 1.81 1.76 1.74 1.83 1.5 1.43 1.51 1.68 1.49 3.0 1.33 1.53 1.53 1.34 5.0 1.13 1.37 1.39 1.23 The viscosity of the Example compositions remained higher than the Comparative upon irradiation. TABLE 26 Machine Direction PSIX104 PSIXl04 % (KPax104) % (KPaxl04) YE YS BE BS Comp 7 0 Mrad 11.6 0.44 310 0.73 (3.03) (5.03) 1.5 3.8 0.93 240 0.93 (6.41) (6.41) 3.0 4.9 0.89 7 0.90 (6.14) (6.21) 5.0 VERY BRITTLE Ex 18 0 Mrad 3.8 0.80 470 1.08 (5.52) (7.45) 1.5 4.1 0.86 290 0.89 (5.93) (6.14) 3.0 4.2 0.87 305 0.88 (6.00) (6.08) 5.0 3.9 0.85 4 0.88 (5.86) (6.08) Ex 19 0 Mrad 3.7 0.81 480 1.28 (5.58) (8.83) 1.5 3.7 0.93 300 1.05 (6.41) (7.24) 3.0 3.7 0.93 115 0.94 (6.41) (6.48) 5.0 6.3 0.93 6 0.94 (6.41) (6.48) Ex 20 0 Mrad 4.9 0.47 460 1.14 (3.24) (7.86) 1.5 7.7 0.94 30 0.95 (6.48) (6.55) 3.0 3.5 0.93 145 0.93 (6.41) (6.41) 5.0 4.0 0.89 14 0.91) (6.14) (6.27) TABLE 26 (cont'd) Transverse Direction PSIX104 PSIX104 (KPaxl04) (KPaxlO4) YE YS BE BS Comp 7 0 Mrad 10.5 0.47 250 0.58 (3.24) (4.00) 1.5 6.0 0.93 18 0.99 (6.41) (6.82) 3.0 4.8 0.93 5 0.95 (6.41) (6.55) 5.0 VERY BRITTLE Ex 18 0 Mrad 7.6 0.79 380 1.23 (5.45) (8.48) 1.5 3.2 0.80 100 0.81 (5.52) (5.58) 3.0 3.5 0.91 4 0.92 (6.27) (6.34) 5.0 VERY BRITTLE Ex 19 0 Mrad INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE 1.5 3.1 0.84 250 0.88 (5.79) (6.07) 3.0 3.1 0.90 130 0.92 (6.21) (6.34) 5.0 7.3 0.92 7 0.94 (6.34) (6.48) Ex 20 0 Mrad 8.8 0.69 370 1.22 (4.76) (8.41) 1.5 5.1 0.84 25 0.88 (5.79) (6.07) 3.0 3.6 0.90 110 0.91 (6.21) (6.27) 5.0 - 0.85 21 0.87 (5.86) (6.00) TABLE 27 Toughness (BE+BS+106) Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 Comp 7 MD 2.3 2.23 0.06 * TD 1.45 .18 .05 * Ex 18 MD 5.08 2.58 2.24 .04 TD 4.67 .08 .04 * Ex 19 MD 6.10 3.15 1.08 .06 TD 6.10** 2.20 1.2 .07 Ex 20 MD 5.24 0.29 1.35 0.13 TD 4.51 0.22 1.00 0.18 TABLE 28 %Toughness Retained Mrad 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 Comp 7 MD 97 3 * TD 12 3 * Ex 18 MD 51 44 0 TD 2 1 * Ex 19 MD 52 18 1 TD 36 20 1 Ex 20 MD 5 26 2 TD 5 22 4 *Too brittle to test **Estimated Physical properties of the amorphous polyamide were found to be sensitive to irradiation when exposed to oxygen. However, the trend in values indicates an improvement when using the stabilizers of the present invention. While exemplary embodiments of the invention have been described, the true scope of the invention is to be determined from the following claims: EXAMPLES 20-22 In Examples 20-22 CAPRONe Nylon 6 (8207) was evaluated with various stabilizers by irradiation in sheet form and tested in accordance with the procedures of Examples 5-7. The sheets were one mil (2.5 x 10-2 mm) thick. The compositions used, tensile properties, and toughness are summarized in Tables 28-31. TABLE 28 Comp 8 Ex 20 Ex 21 Ex 22 Nylon (8207) wt% 100 99.7 99.7 99.7 Goodrite" 3125 - 0.3 - 0.15 Irganox" 1098 - - 0.3 0.15 Viscos ity&commat; 0 Mrad 1.95 1.89 1.90 1.93 1.8 1.32 1.69 1.70 1.66 3.9 1.08 1.37 1.58 1.33 5.3 1.11 1.12 1.28 1.19 TABLE 29 Machine Direction Transverse Direction PS1x104 PSlxl04 PS1x104 PS1x104 % (KPaxl04) % (KPaxl04) % (KPax10 4) % (KPaxl04) YE YS BE BS YE YS BE BS Comp 8 O Mrads 9.4 0.74 330 1.33 10.0 0.64 380 1.30 (5.10) (9.17) (4.41) (8.96) 1.7 " 9.3 0.62 280 0.90 9.1 0.59 330 0.95 (4.27) (6.20) (4.07) (6.55) 4.1 n 8.3 0.64 210 0.71 6.9 0.67 100 0.67 (4.41) (4.90) (4.62) (4.62) 5.5 n 9.1 0.63 85 0.63 8.1 0.59 123 .61 (4.34) (4.34) (4.07) (4.21) Ex. 20 O Mrads 7.6 0.71 320 1.29 8.0 0.73 290 0.92 (4.90) (8.89) (5.03) (6.34) 1.7 " 10.1 0.56 355 1.34 8.8 0.59 320 0.93 (3.86) (9.34) (4.07) (6.41) 4.1 " 8.9 0.65 295 1.02 7.7 0.70 210 0.84 (4.48) (7.03) (4.82) (5.79) 5.5 M 7.4 0.72 293 1.06 7.6 0.64 160 0.72) (4.96) (7.31) (4.41) (4.96) Ex. 21 O Mrads 8.1 0.68 260 1.05 8.6 0.71 255 0.80 (4.69) (7.24) (4.90) (5.52) 1.7 " 10.0 0.57 280 1.00 9.3 0.58 330 0.97 (3.93) (6.89) (4.00) (6.69) 3.8 " 8.0 0.66 285 1.13 7.2 0.67 275 0.78 (4.55) (7.79) (4.62) (5.38) 5.3 " 6.8 0.72 150 0.74 6.5 0.75 160 0.77 (5.32) (5.10) (5.17) (5.31) Ex. 22 O Mrads 9.7 0.57 340 1.57 8.8 0.64 370 1.39 (3.93) (10.82) (4.41) (9.58) 1.7 " 8.4 0.66 335 1.38 8.0 0.68 350 1.14 (4.55) (9.51) (4.49) (7.86) 3.8 " 7.5 0.72 303 1.12 7.0 0.73 258 0.74 (4.96) (7.72) (5.03) (5.10) 5.3 " 6.8 0.73 258 0.93 8.0 0.64 258 0.84 (5.03) (6.41) (4.41) (5.79) TABLE 30 BE x BS x 106 Mrad 0 1.8 3.9 5.3 Comp 8 4.67 2.83 1.08 0.65 Ex. 20 3.40 3.87 2.38 2.12 Ex. 21 2.39 3.00 2.69 1.17 Ex. 22 5.24 4.31 2.66 2.29 TABLE 31 % Tbughness Retained Mrad 0 1.8 3.9 5.3 Comp 8 100 61 23 14 Ex. 20 100 114 70 62 Ex. 21 100 126 113 49 Ex. 22 100 82 51 44 The compositions of Examples 20-22 had improved property retention upon radiation. This is particularly shown by the percent toughness retained results in Table 31 and the viscosity retention in Table 28. EXAMPLES 23-25 In Examples 23-25 CAPRONe 8209 Nylon 6 (8209) was evaluated with the various stabilizers by irradiation in sheet form and tested in accordance with the procedures of Examples 5-7. The sheets were one mil (2.5 x 10'2 mm) thick. The compositions used, tensile properties and toughness are summarized in Tables 32-35. TABLE 32 Comp 9 Ex. 23 Ex. 24 Ex. 25 Nylon (8209) wt% 100 99.7 99.7 99.7 Goodritew 3125 - 0.3 - 0.15 Irganox" 1098 - - 0.3 0.15 Viscosity &commat; O Mrads 2.37 2.42 2.512.35 1.8 1.45 1.86 1.921.80 3.9 1.02 1.55 1.621.62 5.3 1.05 1.27 1.451.38 TABLE 33 Machine Direction Transverse Direction PSIx104 % PSIx104 PSIx104 PSIx104 % (KPax104) % (KPaxlO4) % (KPaxlO4) % (KPaxl04) YE YS BE BS YE YS BE BS Comp 9 O Mrads 11.0 0.69 295 1.24 10.6 0.65 390 1.38 (4.76) (8.55) (4.48) (9.51) 1.7 " 8.5 0.66 300 1.17 8.1 0.65 310 0.84 (4.55) (8.07) (4.48) (5.79) 3.8 " 9.3 0.63 220 0.76 6.4 0.61 190 0.79 (4.34) (5.24) (4.21) (5.45) 5.3 n 9.6 0.66 200 0.77 6.9 0.67 153 0.72 (4.55) (5.31) (4.62) (4.86) Ex. 23 O Mrads 8.9 0.60 320 1.34 7.9 0.60 355 1.29 (4.14) (9.24) (4.14) (8.89) 1.7 " 7.9 0.71 320 1.32 8.2 0.65 335 0.98 (4.90) (9.10) (4.48) (6.76) 3.8 " 8.1 0.69 318 1.28 6.3 0.69 285 0.94 (4.76) (8.83) (4.76) (6.48) 5.3 n 9.4 0.65 255 0.94 7.2 0.69 268 0.74 (4.48) (6.48) (4.76) (5.10) Ex. 24 O Mrads 12.3 0.60 315 1.44 11.6 0.70 405 1.49 (4.14) (9.93) (4.82) (10.27) 1.7 n 8.1 0.65 285 1.23 7.9 0.65 310 0.87 (4.48) (8.48) (4.48) (6.00) 3.8 n 8.7 0.64 295 1.34 6.3 0.67 305 0.88 (4.41) (9.24) (4.62) (6.02) 5.3 n 10.8 0.61 248 0.95 7.6 0.62 250 0.71 (4.21) (6.55) (4.27) (4.90) Ex. 25 O Mards 13.1 0.60 330 1.55 12.2 0.60 365 1.37 (4.14) (10.69) (4.14) (9.45) 1.7 " 8.0 0.66 290 1.18 7.8 0.67 330 1.01 (4.55) (8.14) (4.62) (6.96) 3.8 " 7.5 0.65 300 1.23 7.2 0.60 285 0.80 (4.48) (8.48) (4.14) (5.52) 5.3 n 6.4 0.74 270 1.05 6.0 0.78 198 0.79 (5.10) (7.24) (5.38) (5.45) TABLE 34 BE x BS x 106 Mrad 0 1.8 3.9 5.3 Comp 9 4.52 3.06 1.59 1.30 Ex. 23 4.44 3.75 3.45 2.18 Ex. 24 5.29 3.10 3.32 2.05 Ex. 25 5.06 3.38 3.00 2.20 TABLE 35 % Toughness Retained Mrad 0 1.8 3.9 5.3 Comp 9 100 68 35 28 Ex. 23 100 84 78 49 Ex. 24 100 59 63 39 Ex. 25 100 67 59 44 The compositions of Example 23-25 had improved property retention you irradiation. This is particularly shown by the percent toughness retained results in Table 35 and the viscosity retention shown in Table 32. EXAMPLES 26-28 In Examples 26-28 a one mil (2.5 x 10'2 mm) layer of the polyamide compositions containing CAPRON 8207 Nylon 6 (8207) was coextruded between Wimil (3.8 x 10-2 mm) layers of an ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) sold by Chemplex as Plexar I and having 5 mol percent vinyl acetate. The polyamide composition was first mixed under the same conditions as in described in Example 1. The polyamide composition was extruded through a 1 3/4 inch (1.91 cm) diameter (nominal) Reifenhouser extruder operating at a screw speed of about 43 rpm and a temperature profile of Zone 1-4000F (2040C), Zone 24700F (2430C), Zone 3-5100F (2660C), and the adaptor Zone at 4900F (2540C). The extruder motor drive load amperage was about 11 amps. The Plexar I was extruded through a 2 1/2 inch (6.35 cm) diameter Davis Standard Extruder operating at a screw speed of about 31 rpm and a temperature profile of Zone 1-2000F (930C), Zone 2-3600F (1820C) , Zone 34450F (2290C) and Zone 5-4750F (2460C). The motor drive load amperage was about 45 amps. The extrudate from the extruders was passed to a coextrusion feedblock operating at adaptor zone temperatures of Zone 1-4750F (2460C), Zone 2-4840F (2510C), and Zone 3-4890F (2540C) . The laminate from the coextrusion adaptor went to a die having three zones at Zone 1-4870F (2530C)r Zone 2-4870F (2530C), and Zone 3-4860F(2520C). The coextruded film was then cast on a roll at 800F, followed by a cooling roll at 800F, and another roll at 700F. The film was irradiated in sheet form and tested in accordance with the procedures of Examples 5-7. The compositions of the polyamide layer, tensile properties, and toughness are summarized in Tables 36-39. TABLE 36 Comp 10 Ex. 26 Ex. 27 Ex. 28 Nylon (8209) wt% 100 99.7 99.7 99.7 Goodrite" 3125 - 0.3 - 0.15 Irganox" 1098 - - 0.3 0.15 Viscosity &commat; 0 Mrads 1.89 1.91 1.92 1.91 1.8 1.20 1.42 1.60 1.48 3.9 0.84 1.17 1.30 1.34 5.3 1.01 1.01 1.11 1.12 TABLE 37 Machine Direction Transverse Direction PSLx104 EAlx104 PSlx104 RSlx104 % (KPaxl04) % (KPax104) % (KPaxl04) % (KPaxl04) YE YS BE BS YE YS BE BS Comp 10 O Mrads 14.0 0.23 420 0.56 14.5 0.23 420 0.53 (1.59) (3.86) (1.59) (3.65) 1.9 N 15.6 0.21 440 0.49 15.9 0.20 435 0.46 (1.45) (3.38) (1.38) (3.17) 3.9 " 13.9 0.25 423 0.44 13.2 0.26 407 0.43 (1.72) (3.03) (1.79) (2.96) 5.2 n 13.6 0.25 425 0.46 13.6 0.25 418 0.44 (1.72) (3.17) (1.72) (3.03) Ex. 26 O Mrads 12.3 0.24 390 0.57 14.8 0.23 420 0.56 (1.65) (3.93) (1.59) (3.86) 1.9 n 16.2 0.21 435 0.51 14.8 0.21 440 0.51 (1.45) (3.52) (1.45) (3.52) 3.9 " 15.0 0.26 428 0.55 13.3 0.26 410 0.50 (1.79) (3.79) (1.79) (3.45) 5.2 " 12.8 0.26 395 0.49 12.6 0.26 395 0.47 (1.79) (3,38) (1.79) (3.24) Ex. 27 O Mrads 16.1 0.23 410 0.56 14.9 0.23 400 0.51 (1.59) (3.86) (1.59) (3.52) 1.9 n 16.2 0.21 440 0.54 15.9 0.21 460 0.54 (1.65) (3.72) (1.45) (3.72) 3.9 N 15.2 0.24 438 0.54 13.9 0.24 428 0.50 (1.65) (3.72) (1.65) (3.45) 5.2 n 12.8 0.25 400 0.51 12.2 0.25 413 0.50 (1.72) (3.52) (1.72) (3.45) Ex. 28 O Mrads 16.8 0.23 420 0.61 13.3 0.24 430 0.59 (1.59) (4.21) (1.65) (4.07) 1.9 n 15.4 0.24 450 0.57 14.5 0.23 450 0.55 (1.65) (3.93) (1.59) (3.79) 3.9 N 13.8 0.25 428 0.54 13.3 0.26 433 0.52 (1.72) (3.72) (1.79) (3.59) 5.2 " 12.7 0.27 390 0.52 12.0 0.26 418 0.53 (1.86) (3.59) (1.79) (3.65) TABLE 38 BE x BS x 106 Mrad 0 1.8 3.9 5.3 Comp 10 2.29 2.08 1.80 1.89 Ex. 26 2.29 2.23 2.19 1.93 Ex. 27 2.17 2.43 2.24 2.04 Ex. 28 2.55 2.52 2.28 2.11 TABLE 39 % Toughness Retained Mrad 0 1.8 3.9 5.3 Comp 10 100 91 79 83 Ex. 26 100 97 96 84 Ex. 27 100 112 103 94 Ex. 28 100 99 89 83 The compositions of Examples 26-28 had improved property retention upon irradiation. This was particularly the case up to 3.9 Mrad exposure as shown by the percent toughness retained results in Table 39, and the viscosity retention in Table 36. EXAMPLES 29-31 Examples 26-28 were repeated substituting CAPONS 8209 Nylon 6 (125 FA) for CAPRONe 8207 Nylon 6 (75 FAV). Compositions and physical tests results are summarized in Tables 40-43. TABLE 40 Comp 11 Ex. 29 Ex. 30 Ex. 31 Nylon (8209) wtZ 100 99.7 99.7 99.7 Goodrite" 3125 - 0.3 - 0.15 Irganox" 1098 - - 0.3 0.15 Viscosity &commat; O Mrads 2.31 2.39 2.402.43 1.8 1.38 1.91 1.881.74 3.9 0.84 1.15 1.441.26 5.3 1.01 1.26 1.211.22 TABLE 41 Machine Direction Transverse Direction PSlx104 PS1x104 PSlx104 PS1x104 % (KPax104) % (KPax104) % (KPax104) % (KPaxl04) YE YS BE BS YE YS BE BS Comp 11 O Mrads 13.2 0.26 400 0.58 11.8 0.26 400 0.51 (1.79) (4.00) (1.79) (3.52) 1.9 N 15.3 0.23 430 0.54 12.8 0.23 450 0.51 (1.59) (3.72) (1.59) (3.52) 3.9 N 14.2 0.26 390 0.45 13.2 0.28 420 0.45 (1.79) (3.10) (1.93) (3.10) 5.2 n 15.3 0.26 418 0.52 13.6 0.27 425 0.48 (1.79) (.359) (1.86) (3.31) Ex. 29 O Mrads 21.0 0.22 415 0.70 15.2 0.21 415 0.58 (1.52) (4.83) (1.45) (4.00) 1.9 N 17.0 0.23 420 0.53 13.9 0.23 460 0.56 (1.59) (3.65) (1.59) (3.86) 3.9 " 12.0 0.25 410 0.52 12.4 0.24 424 0.49 (1.72) (3.59) (1.65) (3.38) 5.2 N 13.6 0.25 413 0.59 11.9 0.26 418 0.52 (1.72) (4.07) (1.79) (3.59) Ex. 30 O Mrads 17.8 0.21 400 0.60 16.2 0.21 420 0.57 (1.45) (4.14) (1.45) (3.93) 1.9 N 16.4 0.23 440 0.59 13.0 0.23 440 0.53 (1.59) (4.07) (1.59) (3.65) 4.1 N 15.1 0.24 425 0.56 13.3 0.23 428 0.52 (1.65) (3.86) (1.59) (3.59) 5.5 n 14.4 0.25 408 0.55 12.2 0.25 410 0.50 (1.72) (3.79) (1.72) (3.45) Ex. 31 O Mrads 18.9 0.22 390 0.60 15.2 0.22 440 0.60 (1.52) (4.14) (1.52) (4.14) 1.7 n 15.3 0.25 430 0.58 13.2 0.25 440 0.55 (1.72) (4.00) (1.72) (3.79Y 4.1 N 15.4 0.23 425 0.54 13.2 0.24 423 0.49 (1.59) (3.72) (1.65) (3.38) 5.5 N 13.6 0.25 400 0.52 11.6 0.26 415 0.51 (1.72) (3.59) (1.79) (3.52) TABLE 42 BE x BS x 106 Mrad 0 1.8 3.9 5.3 Comp 11 2.18 2.31 1.86 2.09 Ex. 29 2.66 2.58 2.09 2.24 Ex. 30 2.40 2.47 2.30 2.15 Ex. 31 2.49 2.46 2.16 2.08 TABLE 43 % Toughness Retained Mrad 0 1.8 3.9 5.3 Comp 11 100 106 85 96 Ex. 29 100 97 79 84 Ex. 30 100 103 96 90 Ex. 31 100 99 87 84 The compositions of Examples 29-31 generally retained properties upon erradiation. In particular the viscosity was maintained as indicated in Table 40 and the viscosity retantion results shown in Table 40. EXAMPLE 32 Example 28 was repeated substituting the polyamide terpolymer described in Example 8 for the CAPRONe 8207 Nylon 6. Compositions and physical test results are summarized in Table 44-47. TABLE 44 Comp 12 Ex. 32 Terpolymer wt. % 100 99.7 Goodrite 3125 - 0.15 Irganox 1098 - 0.15 Viscosity O Mrad 1.67 1.85 1.8 1.10 1.63 3.9 0.64 1.47 5.3 0.79 1.29 TABLE 45 Machine Direction Transverse Direction PSlx104 PS1x104 PSlxlO4 PSlxl04 % (KPax104) % (KPaxl04) % (KPax104) % (KPaxl04) YE YS BE BS YE BE YS BS Coop 12 O Mrads 13.6 0.22 440 0.53 12.7 0.22 435 0.46 (1.52) (3.65) (1.52) (3.17) 1.7 N 10.2 0.25 440 0.46 10.1 0.25 440 0.42 (1.72) (3.17) (1.72) (2.90) 4.1 N 10.7 0.25 420 0.38 10.7 0.26 405 0.34 (1.72) (2.62) (1.79) (2.34) 5.5 N 10.5 0.24 405 0.38 10.1 0.24 415 0.36 (1.65) (2.62) (1.65) <RTI ID=50.9> (2.48) Ex. 32 O Mrads - 0.15 440 0.49 17.7 0.17 410 0.43 (1.03) (3.38) (1.17) (2.96) 1.7 N 10.9 0.23 445 0.49 8.9 0.24 450 0.45 (1.59) (3.38) (1.65) (3.10) 4.1 n 12.4 0.22 438 0.46 11.5 0.22 425 0.42 (1.52) (3.17) (1.52) (2.90) 5.5 " 10.8 0.24 433 0.45 11.1 0.24 430 0.41 (1.65) (3.10) (1.65) (2.83) TABLE 46 BE x BS x 106 Mrad 0 1.8 3.9 5.3 Coop 12 2.17 1.94 1.47 1.55 Ex. 32 1.96 2.11 1.90 1.82 TABLE 47 % Toughness Retained Mrad 0 1.8 3.9 5.3 Coop 12 100 89 68 71 Ex. 32 100 108 97 93 The compost ions of Example 32 generally had improved property retention as indicated in both Tables 44 and 47 for viscosity and percent toughness retention. While exemplary embodiments of the invention have been described, the true scope of the invention is to be determined from the following claims:

Claims: What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising irradiating a composition comprising a polyamide and from 0.01 to 10 percent based on the weight of the polyamide of a hindered phenol having the formula: EMI51.1 wherein: R1 is methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3 to 10 carbons; R2 is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3 to 10 carbons; x is from 2 to 6; n is from 2 to 6 and Z is selected from groups consisting of alkylenes, arylenes, cyanurates esters, amines, amides, oxygen, sulfur, phosphorus and mixtures thereof. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the hindered phenol is EMI51.2 where in x is 2-6 and y is 2-10. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the hindered EMI52.1 <tb> phenol <SEP> is <SEP> o <tb> <SEP> C(GH3)3 <SEP> 0 <SEP> / <SEP> G <SEP> <SEP> c <SEP> t <tb> <SEP> - <SEP> t <SEP> 1 <tb> <SEP> X <SEP> ASs4 <tb> <SEP> o <tb> <SEP> (tr13, <SEP> -O--CY <tb> <SEP> ce%)5 <tb> wherein x is 2 to 6 and y is 2-10. 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the radiation is gamma irradiation. 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the composition is in the form of a film. 6. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the polyamide is selected from polyepsiloncaprolactam and polyhexamethylene adipamide. 7. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the composition is in the form of a molded article. 8. An irradiated article made from comprising a composition comprising a polyamide and from 0.01 to 10 percent based on the weight of the polyamide of a hindered phenol having the formula: EMI52.2 wherein: R1 is methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3 to 10 carbons; R2 is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3 to 10 carbons; x is from 2 to 6; n is from 2 to 6 and Z is selected from groups consisting of alkylenes, arylenes, cyanurates, esters, amines, amides, oxygen, sulfur, phosphorus, and mixtures thereof. 9. A method of sterilizing an article comprising the steps of: packaging the article in a package made of a composition comprising a polyamide and from 0.01 to 10 percent based on the weight of the polyamide of a hindered phenol having the formula: EMI53.1 wherein: R1 is methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3 to 10 carbons; R2 is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3 to 10 carbons; x is from 2 to 6; n is from 2 to 6 and Z is selected from groups consisting of alkylenes, arylenes, cyanurates, esters, amines, amides, oxygen, sulfur, phosphorus, and mixtures thereof; and irradiating the packaged article. 10. The method as recited in claim 13 further comprising the step of sealing the article within the package. 11. A multilayer film having at least one layer comprising an irradiated composition comprising a polymer and from 0.01 to 10 percent based on the weight of the polymer of a hindered phenol having the formula EMI54.1 wherein: R1 is methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3 to 10 carbons; R2 is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl or an alpha-branched alkyl group of from 3 to 10 carbons; x is from 2 to 6; n is from 2 to 6 and Z is selected from groups consisting of alkylenes, arylenes, cyanurates esters, amines, amides, oxygen, sulfur, phosphorus and mixtures thereof.

Inventors: HUTHWAITE, HERBERT J., SIBILIA, JOHN P., STEWART, DONALD F.
Applicants: ALLIED-SIGNAL INC. (A DELAWARE CORPORATION)
Application year: 1984
Main classification: C08L77
IPC codes: C08K5, C08L77, C08J5, A61L2