LAMINATES WITH IMPROVED ADHESION

Abstract: In a laminate comprising adjacent layers composed of incompatible polymers, the adhesion between the layers is enhanced by irradiation of the laminate, and can be further enhanced by high temperature annealing of the irradiated lami­ nate.

Description: This invention relates to laminated polymeric articles. In the production of polymeric shaped articles, e.g. heat-shrinkable articles, such as tubing and molded parts, there is almost always a compromise required between desired properties and price, and frequently between different desired properties. For example, products made from polyethylene or similar polymers (e.g. ethylene/vinyl acetate and ethylene/ethyl acrylate copolymers) are of low cost and have good low temperature flexibility, but they have moderate solvent resistance at room temperature and poor solvent resistance at elevated temperature, and are not suitable for use at temperatures above about 1350C. Products based on polar polymers blended with elastomers can show good resistance to polar solvents and good heat aging properties as compared to polyethylene, and are moderately priced. Products comprising mainly fluoropolymers (e.g. blends of Viton with polyvinylidene fluoride) have better solvent resistance and heat aging, and are flexible at room temperature; but they have very poor flexibility at low temperature, e.g. at -550C, and are very expensive. Polyvinylidene fluoride itself (and similar thermoplastic fluoropolymers) is stiff even at room temperature, but has excellent solvent resistance and heat aging properties. Each of the polymers has high dielectric strength, provided it is sufficiently thick. Laminates, i.e. multi-layer products, in which one layer provides some desired properties and another layer provides complementary properties, can in principle offer a satisfactory compromise. However, it is not satisfactory merely to have two (or more) layers which or each of which prevents egress of fused thermosetting adhesive from within the tube skirt when the device is heated. Preferably the or each of the inserts is conformable to the shape and/or size of the object to be connected, in which case it is preferably formed from a fusible material having a relatively high melt viscosity, i.e. a melt viscosity sufficiently higher than that of the thermosetting adhesive to prevent egress of the fused thermosetting adhesive, or it is formed from a heat-shrinkable polymeric material, and preferably one that has a recovery temperature close to or below that of the recoverable tube or skirt. Examples of materials that may be used to form fusible inserts include those materials used as the adhesive for forming a temporary bond in our U.K. Patent Application No. 8,329,787, e.g. polyamide adhesives such as described in U.S. Patent Specifications Nos. 4,013,733 or 4,181,775 or nylon 11 and 12. Examples of heat-shrinkable polymers that may be used include low, medium or high density polyethylene or ethylene copolymers, e.g. ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers or polyamides such as nylon 11 and 12. In many instances the device will be intended to be used to couple a male pipe that is to be inserted within a female pipe or the device will include a rigid tube that is intended to constitute a male or female part of a joint, in which case the device is preferably arranged so that the insert is located adjacent to the thermosetting adhesive insert and on that side of the thermosetting adhesive insert which is remote from the female part or will, in use, be remote from the female which is higher than the melting point of at least one of the polymers in at least one of the compo sit ions; and (2) irradiating the laminate prepared in step (1). Preferably the process includes a further step in which the irradiated laminate is heat-treated,preferably at a temperature which is above the melting point of at least one of the polymers in at least one of the compositions. For the purposes of the present invention, polymeric compositions are regarded as incompatible if a laminate of the two compositions, made by the process described. in connection with Example 1 below-(without the radiation or annealing steps) has a peel strength of less than 0.9 kg/cm (5 pli), the invention being especially valuable when the peel strength is less than 0.5 kg/cm (3 pli), e.g. less than 0.36 kg/cm (2 pli), particularly less than 0.27 kg/cm (1.5 pli). Peel strengths given in this specification are measured at room temperature by the method described in the Examples. The excellent results provided by the present invention are believed to result at least in part from chemical cross-linking across the interface between the layers; it is therefore essential that each of the polymeric compositions be radiation cross-linkable. Known radiation cross-linking agents are prefereably included in the compositions to assist in making them radiation crosslinkable. Subject to this limitation, this invention makes it possible to combine the desirable properties (eg. low cost, physical, chemical or electrical properties) of incompatible polymeric compositions, in a way which has hitherto been regarded as quite impossible preferably both compositions are electrically insulating. the sleeve 21 is located within each skirt adjacent to the epoxy ring 25 and on that side of the epoxy ring remote from the tube 22. In this embodiment, the pipes to be connected are simply pushed into each end of the tube 22, so that each end of the tube 22 forms a female part of a separate joint, and the device is heated, causing the heat-shrinkable skirts to recover onto the pipes and causing the epoxy ring to melt, the inserts 26 preventing the fused epoxy adhesive to flow along the pipes away from the joints. Figure 2 shows a modification in which the rigid tube 22 is of substantially constant diameter for forming a connection between pipes of the same size. The ends of the tube 22, as with any other of the devices, may be flared if desired to improve penetration of the thermosetting adhesive into the joints. A further form of device is shown in figure 3 in which a rigid copper tube is intended to act as the male part of the joints to the pipes to be connected. The tube 31 is provided at each end with a connector device 32 similar to that shown in figure 1 of U.K. Patent Application No. 8,329,787. Each connector device is partially recovered onto the tube 31 in order to form a skirt 33 that extends around the end region of the tube. Each skirt 33 contains an epoxy ring 34 and, adjacent to the epoxy ring and on the side of the epoxy ring remote from the ends of tube 31, a blocking insert 36 as described above. The pipes to be connected are pushed over the ends of the tube 31 until their ends abut the epoxy rings 34 and the skirts are recovered about the pipe ends as described above. The inserts 36 prevent fused epoxy adhesive being formed away from the pipes under the partially recovered sections 38 of the skirts. The polymeric compositions used in the two layers can include additives such as antioxidants, acid acceptors and other stabilizers; colorants; flame retardants (not normally required for fluoropolymers, but often necessary for nylons and polyethylene; inert fillers, e.g. calcium carbonate; plasticizers, e.g. diallyl phthalate (especially if no elastomers are added); processing aids; and compounds which enhance the crosslinking of the polymer on irradiation. For many applications, it is desirable that polymeric products be resistant to solvents. Immersing laminated articles in a solvent which swells one or both of the layers places a stress on the bond line between them and may result in delami nat ion of layers which have high bond strengths before immersion. As shown by the Examples below, this invention can be used to produce laminates having excellent solvent resistance. We have found that it is important to use a sufficiently high temperature in the formation of the laminate. Preferably the interface is heated to a temperature which is higher than the melting point of at least one of the polymers in each of the compositions. Coextrusion of the two compositions is a preferred method of preparing the laminates. The conditions in the radiation and heat-treatment steps should be selected to obtain a suitable increase, preferably at least a two-fold increase, in the peel strength of the laminate. Radiation dosages in the range 2.0 to 15.0 Mrads are usually satisfactory, e.g. 5 to 10.0 Mrads, depending on the polymeric composition and any radiation cross-linking agent therein. Radiation at room temperature is preferred. We have found that heat-treatment of the irradiated laminate results in substantial increases in bond strength. Preferably the laminate is annealed at a temperature higher than the melting point of at least one, and preferably all, of the polymers in each of the compositions. Annealing can be combined with a high temperature deformation step used to convert the laminate into a heat-recoverable article. Annealing times of up to 10 minutes are generally satisfactory. In another embodiment, the irradiated laminate is heat-treated for an extended time, e.g. at least 12 hours, preferably at least 24 hours, at an elevated temperature which is below the melting point of any polymer which is present in significant amount in either the first or the second polymeric composition, preferably at a temperature of at least 1000C, e.g. 125-1750C. EXAMPLES The invention is illustrated in the following Examples, which are summarized in the Tables below. In each of the Examples, a laminate was made from a first composition A and a second composition B. In Examples 1, 4-19, 36-39, 41, 44 and 45, the laminates were in the form of slabs which were prepared as follows. A slab of the lower modulus material (Composition A) was pressed at 2100C in a 15 x 15 cm (6 x 6 inch), 0.95 or 1.1 mm (37 or 45 mil) frame, using maximum ram force of about 18,000 kg (40,000 lb). A slab of the higher modulus material (composition B) was pressed at 210C in a 15 x 15 cm (6 x 6 inch) 0.25 mm (10 mil) frame, using maximum ram force of about 18,000 kg (40,000 lb). A 2.5 cm (1 inch) wide foil strip was placed on a marginal portion of the top surface of the thicker slab (to provide a starting point for the subsequent peel test). The thin slab was then placed on top and the two slabs laminated together in a 15 x 15 cm (6 x 6 inch) 0.95 or 1.1 mm (37 or 45 mil) frame, at 2100C, the ram pressure being 2,250 kg (5,000 lb) for 1 min., 4,500 kg (10,000 lb) for 1 min., and 9,000 kg (20,000 lb) for 1 min. Pressure was released, and the laminate was removed and placed in a cold water press under a pressure of 11,300 kg (25,000 lb) for 1 minute. In Examples 20 to 35, the same procedure was followed except that Composition A was pressed in a 0.4 mm (15 mil) frame and Composition B was pressed in 0.25 mm (10 mil) frame. In a few of the Examples, as indicated by the notation n (+5MR)" in the Tables, the slabs were irradiated before they were laminated. In Examples 2, 3, 40,. 42, and 43, the laminate was in the form of tubing prepared by coextruding a first composition A to form an inner layer of thickness about 0.65 mm (25 milj and a second composition B to form an outer layer of thickness about 0.13 mm (5 mil). The internal diameter of the tubing about 5.7 mm (0.225 inch). In each of the Examples, strips 15 x 0.65 cm (6 x 0.25 inch) were cut from the laminates. Where indicated in the Tables below, the strips were irradiated and/or annealed. In most cases, annealing was effected immediately after irradiation, but as shown by the peel strengths in Example 2 marked *, measured on samples which were annealed after sufficient time had elapsed for free radicals to decay, a delay between irradiation and annealing is not significant. In Examples 40-43, some of the strips were soaked in methylethylketone (MEK) for sufficient time to give the indicated percentage increase in weight, or were exposed to gasoline for the indicated time; bond strengths were measured after the solvent had evaporated for 24 hours. The bond strength between the two layers was then determined on a standard Instron at a peel rate of 5.1 cm (2 inch) per minute. As those skilled in the art will realise, it is difficult to obtain consistent results in the measurement of peel strengths, particularly at low peel strengths. In addition, it should be pointed out that the peel strengths of the tubular laminates are not comparable with the peel strengths of the slab laminates. The various compositions used in the Examples are identified below. Compositions A Al Ionomer A2 High density polyethylene A3 EPDM elastomer A4 Low density polyethylene A5 Low density polyethylene containing a radiation cross-linking agent A6 Blend of a fluoroelastomer and a thermoplastic elastomer containing stabilizers, flame retardants, and a radiation cross-linking agent A7 Same as A6, but without the cross-linking agent A8 Ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer containing stabilizers, and a radiation cross-linking agent A9 Ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer containing stabilizers, flame-retardants and a radiation cross-linking agent A10 Ethylene/ethyl acrylate copolymer containing stabilizers, flame-retardants and a radiation cross-linking agent All Thermoplastic elastomer containing stabilizers, flame retardants and a radiation cross-linking agent Compositions B B1 Polyvinylidene fluoride containing stabilizers, plasticiser and radiation cross-linking agent B2 High density polyethylene B3 Polyvinylidene fluoride B4 Polyvinylidene fluoride containing a radiation cross-linking agent B5 A blend of polyvinylidene fluoride and a fluoroelastomer containing a radiation cross-linking agent B6 High density polyethylene containing a radiation cross-linking agent B7 Nylon-i2 B8 A blend of polyvinylidene fluoride and an acrylic elastomer containing stabilizers and a radiation cross-linking agent B9 A blend of polvinylidene fluoride and an ionomer containing stabilisers B10 Ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer B11 Polyvinylidene fluoride containing a radiation cross-linking agent B12 Nylon 12 containing a radiation cross-linking agent B13 Ionomer B14 Ionomer containing a radiation cross-linking agent TABLE A Bond Strength in kg/cm (pli) After Annealing (Mins/ C) Ex No. A B Dose None 5/100 5/150 5/175 5/200 5/225 240/175 1 6 1 0 0.4 (2.1) - - - - 0.3 (1.6) 5.0 0.75 (4.2) - - 1.2 (6.8) - 1.25 (6.9) 10.0 0.91(5.2) 1.15(6.5) 1.5 (8.4) 2 6 1 0 1.0 (5.6) - 0.5 (3.1) - - - (Tubing) 5 1.3 (7.4) 0.85 (4.8) 1.1 (6.4) 2.25(12.7) 2.4 (13.5) 3.4 (19.0) 3.4(18.9) 2.15(12.0)* 10 1.5 (8.2) 1.25 (7.0) 1.35(7.6) 2.35(13.2) 2.35(13.1) - 2.1 (11.9)* 15 1.3 (7.3) 1.1 (6.1) 1.3 (7.2) 2.3(12.9) 2.45(13.8) - 2.1 (12.0)* 3 6 2 0 0.45(2.5) - - - - - (Tubing) 10 0.9 (4.9) 0.75 (4.1) 0.95(5.4) 1.05(5.8) - - - TABLE B Bond Strength in kg/cm (pli) after annealing Ex No. A B Dose (NMR) None 10min/225 C 4 6 3 0 0.15(0.9) 1.15 (6.4) 5 0.52(2.9) 1.15 (6.5) 10 0.4 (2.1) 5 6 4 0 0.1 (0 6) 5 0.05(0.4) 0.5 (2.7) 10 0.55(3.1) 1.1 (6.2) 6 6 1 0 0.1 (0.5) 5 0.55(3.2) 1.15 (6.5) 10 0.25(1.4) 0.65 (3.7) 7 6 5 0 0.1 (0.6) 5 0.05(0.4) 0.2 (1.1) 10 0.75(4.1) 0.3 (1.7) 8 6 2 0 0.2 (1.0) 5 2.3(12.8) 3.35(18.7) 10 1.95(10.9) 2.85(15.9) 9 6 6 0 0.1 (0.7) 5 1.65(9.3) 3.0 (16.9) 10 1.15(6.5) 2.0 (11.1) 10 7 3 0 0 5 0.05(0.2) 0.1 (0.5) 11 8 1 0 0 5 0.2 (1.0) 0.35 (2.0) 10 0.15(0.8) 0.3 (1.8) TABLE B (cont) Bond Strength kg/cm (pli) after annealing Ex No. A B Dose (MR) none 10min/225 C 12 9 1 0 0 10 0.15 (0.8) 0.3 (1.8) 13 10 1 0 0 10 0.15 (0.8) 0.75(4.2) 14 10 8 0 0 5 0.9 (4.9) 0.85(4.7) 15 10 9 0 0.02 (0.1) 5 0.35 (2.1) 0.75(4.1) 16 1 1 0 0 5 0.04 (0.2) 0.15(1.0) 10 0 0.15(0.8) 17 1 2 0 0.04 (0.2) 5 0.09 (0.5) 0.4 (2.2) 18 1 7 0 0 5 0 0.45(2.5) 19 3 1 0 0 5 0.3 (1.7) 0.95(5.4) 10 0.7 (3.9) 1.05(6.0) 20 4 3 0 0 5 0 0 21 5 3 0 0 5 0 0 22 4 1 0 0 5 0 0 23 5 1 0 0 5 0 0 24 4 11 0 0.7 (4.0) - 5 0.9 (5.1) > 2.5 (14) 25 5 11 0 0.55(3.0) 5 1.35(7.6) 1.35(7.6) TABLE B (cont) Bond Strength kg/cm (pli) after annealing Ex No. A B Dose (MR) None 10min/2250C 26 4 7 0 0 5 0 0 27 4 12 0 0 5 0 0 28 5 7 0 0 5 0.1 (0.6) 0.25(1.5) 29 5 12 0 0 5 0.05(0.4) 0.2 (1.1) 30 4 13 0 0 5 0.03(0.2) 0.07(0.4) 31 4 14 0 0.1 (0.6) 5 1.95(11.0) 2.05(11.4) 32 5 13 0 0 5 0.35(1.9) 0.5 (2.9) 33 5 14 0 0.1 (0.5) 5 0.6 (3.4) 1.25 (6.9) 34 4 13 0 0.3 (1.7) (+1OMR)(+1OMR) 35 5 14 0 1.6 (9.1) (+1OMR)(+1OMR) 36 6 1 0 0.65(3.6) 0.4 (2.2) 5 1.15(6.5) 1.3 (7.4) 37 6 1 0 0.65(3.7) 0.3 (1.6) (+5MR) 5 0.8 (4.4) 0.8 (4.5) 38 6 1 0 1.5 (8.5) 0.9 (5.1) (+5MR) 5 1.7 (9.4) 1.7 (9.7) 39 6 1 0 1.55(8.7) 1.0 (5.7) (+5MR) (+5MR) 5 1.7 (9.5) 1.7 (9.4) TABLE C Bood Strength in kg/cm (pli) after annealing Ex No. A B Dose (MR) None 10min/2250C and solvent exposure 40 6 1 0 1.0 (5.6) - O (33% MEK) (Tubing) 5 1.3 (7.4) - 0.9 (4.9)(41% MEK) 5 - 3.4(19) 1.6 (8.9)(45% MEK) 41 6 1 0 0.75(4.2) - O (40% MEK) (+5MR) (+5MR) 42 6 1 5 1.3 (7.4) - 0.4 (2.3)(24 hrs. to gasoline) (Tubing) 0.25(1.4)(72 hrs. to qasoline) 0.35(2.0)(7 days to gasoline) 43 6 1 5 - 2.4 (13.5) 1.2 (6.8)(24 hrs. to gasoline) (Tubing) 1.3 (7.4)(24 hrs. to qasoline) 1.25(7.0)(7 days to gasoline) 44 11 1 0 0.1(0.5) 0.1(0.5) 0.2(1.1) 0.6(3.5) 1 day/1500C 3 days/1500C 5 days/1500C 45 6 1 5 0.2(1.2) 0.75(4.2) 1.05(5.9) 1.4(7.8)

Claims: CLAIMS: 1. A method of preparing a laminate comprising a first layer composed of a first polymeric composition and an adherent second layer composed of a second polymeric composition which is incompatible with the first polymeric composition, which method comprises (1) preparing a laminate comprising a layer of the first composition and an adjacent layer of the second composition by a process in which the interface between the layers is heated to a temp erature which is higher than the melting point of at least one of the polymers in at least one of the compositions; and (2) irradiating the laminate prepared in step (1). 2. A method according to Claim 1 wherein in step (1), the interface is heated to a temperature which is higher than the melting point of at least one of the polymers in each of the compositions. 3. A method according to claim 1 or 2 which comprises (3) annealing the irradiated laminate at a temper ature which is higher than the melting point of at least one of the polymers in at least one of the compositions. 4. A method according to Claim 3 wherein in step (3), the laminate is annealed at a temperature which is higher than the melting point of at least one of the polymers in each of the compositions. 5. A method according to Claim 3 or 4 wherein the product of step (3) has a peel strength which is at least twice the peel strength of the product of step (1). 6. A process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the first composition comprises at least one polymer which is a fluoropolymer, a polyolefin or a polyamide. 7. A process according to Claim 6 wherein the first composition also contains an elastomer. 8. A process according to Claim 6 or 7 wherein the first composition comprises polyvinylidene fluoride. 9. A process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the second composition comprises an elastomer. 10. A process according to any one of the preceding claims which comprises deforming the irradiated laminate at a temperature which is higher than the melting point of at least one of the polymers in at least one of the compositions, and cooling the deformed laminate, thereby preparing a heat-recoverable article.

Inventors: KAWAZOYE, YUTAKA, VOGDES, CHRISTINE ELLEN
Applicants: RAYCHEM CORPORATION (A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION)
Application year: 1984
Main classification: B32B31
IPC codes: B32B37, B32B27, B29C65, B29C53, B29C61, B29C63, B29K27, B29L9, B29C47