SALT SUBSTITUTE BLENDS OF POTASSIUM CHLORIDE AND MALTODEXTRIN AND METHOD OF PREPARATION

Abstract: A salt substitute composition is disclosed which includes a blend comprising: (a) potassium chloride and (b) maltodextrin. Such blends may include additionally sodium chloride or cream of tartar or a mixture thereof.

Description: SALT SUBSTITUTE BLENDS OF POTASSIUM CHLORIDE AND MALTODEXTRIN AND METHOD OF PREPARATION. The present invention relates to a blend composition useful as a substitute for salt. There are a number of salt substitute compositions which are described in the literature and/or are available commercially containing potassium chloride with and without sodium chloride. Such compositions have been proposed for people who seek to eliminate or minimize the amount of sodium chloride in thei-r diet due to medical necessity or for other reasons. However, the heretofore known salt substitutes have not been entirely satisfactory from the standpoints of similarity to common salt (i.e. sodium chloride) in taste and appearance. Accordingly, there is a substantial need in the art for an improved salt substitute composition. In our copending European Application No. filed concurrently herewith (our ref: CTE/JFA/84127), there is described a salt substitute composition which comprises coated particles, each particle comprising: (a) a core comprising potassium chloride and (b) a coating on the core, the coating comprising maltodextrin, wherein the dextrose equivalent (D.E.) of the combined core and coating is not more than 10 D.E. units. It has now been found unexpectedly that an effective salt substitute can be prepared in simple and efficient manner by admixing potassium chloride and maltodextrin. If desired, sodium chloride or cream of tartar, or a mixture thereof, may additionally be included in such salt substitutes. Admixtures resulting from such admixing have unexpectedly been found to be effective salt-substitute compositions which at least closely approach the taste and appearance of salt and substantially fulfill the above-mentioned need. Generally stated, the present invention provides a salt-substitute blend composition which comprises a uniform admixture comprising: (a) potassium chloride and (b) maltodextrin, wherein the detrose equivalent (D.E.) of the admixture is not more than 10 D.E. units. According to a preferred aspect of the invention there is provided a salt-substitute blend composition which comprises a uniform admixture consisting essentially of: (a) potassium chloride and (b) maltodextrin, wherein the dextrose equivalent (D.E.) of the combined amount of potassium chloride and maltodextrin is not more than 10 D.E. units. The invention further provides a salt-substitute blend composition which comprises a uniform admixture comprising: (a) potassium chloride (b) maltodextrin and (c) sodium chloride, wherein the dextrose equivalent (D.E.) of the combined amount of potassium chloride, maltodextrin and sodium chloride is not more than 10 D.E. units. In a preferred embodiment, the above salt substitute composition further includes, in addition to the specified components (a), (b) and (c), cream of tartar. In this embodiment, the D.E. of the combined amount of potassium chloride, maltodextrin, sodium chloride and cream of tartar is preferably not more than 10 D.E. units. In another of its aspects the invention provides a salt-substitute blend composition which comprises a uniform admixture comprising: (a) potassium chloride, (b) maltodextrin and (c) cream of tartar, and being free of sodium chloride, wherein the dextrose equivalent (D.E.) of the combined amount of potassium chloride, maltodextrin and cream of tartar is not more than 10 D.E. units. As used herein with reference to a material, the terms "dextrose equivalent" and "D.E." mean the total amount of reducing sugars (calculated as dextrose) in the material, which amount is expressed as a percent of the total weight (dry basis) of the material. Such percent is referred to herein as "D.E. units." (Reducing sugars include, e.g., all monosaccharides; maltose; cellobiose; and lactose. Sucrose is a non-reducing sugar.) The D.E. of a material consisting of two or more components can be calculated by multiplying the weight fraction ("w.f.") of each component of the material by the D.E. of such component and adding the resulting products of multiplication. For example, a material consisting of 20% (0.20 w.f.) component A having a D.E. of 10 D.E. units and 80% (0.80 w.f.) component B having a D.E. of zero has a D.E. of 2 (0.20 x 10 + 0.80x0) D.E. units. The salt substitute of the present invention contains at least two essential components, namely potassium chloride and maltodextrin, as indicated above. In addition the salt substitute of the invention may include sodium chloride and/or cream of tartar. In general, these components may be combined in any relative proportions in accordance with the teachings hereof to prepare a broad range of salt substitutes useful for a wide variety of end use applications, e.g., for table salt, inclusion in snack foods (e.g., pretzels, potato chips (potato crisps), corn chips (corn crisps), etc.), cereals, baked goods and other edible compositions such as those which heretofore have included common salt (i.e., sodium chloride) as an ingredient thereof. In use, the salt substitutes of the present invention may be substituted in whole or in part for the common salt component of heretofore known edible compositions. When the salt substitute includes only the two components potassium chloride and maltodextrin, these may be present in the below indicated amounts: potassium chloride: from about 99 to about 60%, and maltodextrin: from about 1 to about 40%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of such components. As a general preference, the potassium chloride component in such a two component mixture is included in an amount from about 90 to about 70% and the maltodextrin component is included in an amount from about 10 to about 30%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of such components. More preferably, the potassium chloride is included in such a two component mixture in an amount from about 85 to about 80% and the maltodextrin i5 included in an amount from about 15 to about 20%, such percentages being by weight and on the aforesaid basis (i.e., the combined total weight of these components being 100% by weight). When the salt substitute includes as its three essential components potassium chloride, maltodextrin and sodium chloride, these may be included in the below indicated amounts: potassium chloride: from about 91 to about 19t, maltodextrin: from about 1 to about 40%, and sodium chloride: from about 0.1 to about 75%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of such components. As a general preference, the potassium chloride components in such a three component composition is included in an amount from about 91 to about 20%, the maltodextrin component is included in an amount from about 10 to about 30%, and the sodium chloride component is included in an amount from about 1 to about 50%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of the three components set forth above. More preferably, the potassium chloride is included in such a three component mixture in an amount from about 85 to about 65%, the maltodextrin is included in an amount from about 15 to about 20%, and the sodium chloride is included in an amount from about 3 to about 15%, such percentages being by weight and on the aforesaid basis (i.e., the combined total weight of these three components being 100% by weight). Advantageously, the above-described saltsubstitute compositions of the present invention further include cream of tartar in admixture with the three above-mentioned components, i.e. potassium chloride, maltodextrin and sodium chloride. In any such embodiment cream of tartar can be included in any effective amount, that is; an amount such that the admixture more closely approaches common salt in at least one taste characteristic than a reference composition which is substantially the same as the admixture except not including the cream of tartar and including additional potassium chloride in an amount equal to the amount of cream of tartar. In general, such amount may be up to about 1% or more, based on the total weight of the four components. The amounts of the components in these four component embodiments may be, for example: potassium chloride: from about 91 to about 19%, maltodextrin: from about 1 to about 40%, sodium chloride: from about 0.1 to about 50%, and cream of tartar: from about 0.1 to about 0.9%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of said components. As a general preference, the potassium chloride component is included in such a four component composition in an amount from about 91 to about 19%, the maltodextrin component is included in an amount from about 10 to about 30%, the sodium chloride component is included in an amount from about 0.1% to about 50%, and the cream of tartar component is included in an amount from about 0.1 to about 0.7%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of the four components set forth above. More preferably, the potassium chloride is included in an amount from about 85 to about 65%, the maltodextrin is included in an amount from about 15 to about 20%, the sodium chloride is included in an amount from about 0.1 to about 15%, and the cream of tartar is included in an amount from about 0.1 to about 0.5%, such percentages being by weight and on the aforesaid basis (i.e., the combined total weight of these four components being 100% by weight). Cream of tartar suitably included herein is commercially available from McCormick & Co. (3altimore, Maryland). In general, cream of tartar is preferably included in the above mentioned four component coJnpvDsitions in an amount of about 0.33%. When the salt substitute includes the three components potassium chloride, maltodextrin and cream of tartar, these may be present in the below indicated amounts: potassium chloride: from about 99 to about 59%, maltodextrin: from about 1 to about 40%, and cream of tartar: from about 0.1 to about 0.9%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of such components. As a general preference, the potassium chloride component is included in such a three component mixture in an amount from about 91 to about 69%, the maltodextrin component is included in an amount from about 10 to about 30%, and the cream of tartar component is included in an amount from about 0.1 to about 0.7%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of these components. More preferably, the potassium chloride is included in an amount from about 85 to about 79%, the maltodextrin is included in an amount from about 15 to about 20%, and the cream of tartar is included in an amount from about 0.1 to about 0.5%, such percentages being by weight and on the aforesaid basis (i.e., the combined total weight of these three components being 1008 by weight. For human consumption of the salt-substitute compositions, all ingredients employed should be humanly edible, e.g., Food Chemical Codex grade. Any suitable maltodextrin may be employed as the maltodextrin component. The maltodextrin employed is preferably a water-soluble maltodextrin having at least a -ajor portion (e.g., slightly more than 50%, preferably about 60% or more) of one or more polysaccharides having a D.P. (i.e., degree of polymerization) of at least 10. More preferably, the maltodextrin employed is additionally a starch hydrolyzate of low sweetness having a low dextrose equivalent value of from about 5 to about 20 more preferably about 5 to about 15 D.E. units, high water solubility with substantial freedom from haze and low hygroscopicity. The most preferred maltodextrin employed herein is that commercially available from Grain Processing Corporation (GPC), Muscatine, Iowa, under the designation MALTRINR Ml00 maltodextrin. According to the "Typical Analysis" in GPC Bulletin 11011 entitled MALTRIN Maitodextrins & Corn Syrup Solids, M100 maltodextrin has a D.E. of about 9-12 D.E. units and a "Carbohydrate Composition, % (db)" as follows: dextrose (1.0), disaccharides (4.0), trisaccharides (6.0) and "tetrasaccharides & higher" (89.0). According to GPC Product Data Sheet 6011 for MALTRIN M100 maltodextrin, the M100 has a "Typical Carbohydrate Profile (dry basis) in % as follows: monosaccharides (1%), disaccharides (4%), trisaccharides (68), tetrasaccharides (5%) and "pentasaccharides & BR< above" (84%). According to GPC Bulletin 9102 relating to "Carbohydrate Profile" of MALTRIN maltodextrins and corn syrup solids, M100 maltodextrin has the following "Typical Carbohydrate Profile: Saccharides-by Degree Amount % of Potymerization Average Range DP1 0.5 0.3 - 0.8 DP2 2.7 2.3 - 2.9 DP3 4.3 4.2 - 5.0 DP4 3.7 3.3 - 4.1 DP5 3.1 2.7 - 3.4 DP6 5.0 0.7 - 6.0 DP7 7.1 6.5 - 8.3 DP8 4.5 4.2 - 5.3 DP9 3.1 2.8 - 3.6 DP10 1.6 0.6 - 2.9 Above DP10 64.4 56.8 - 68.1 The above GPC bulletins and data sheet are incorporated herein by reference. Maltodextrins suitable for use herein may be prepared, for example, in accordance with the methods disclosed in U.S. Patents 3,560,343; 3,663,369; 3,849,194; and 4,298,400. These patents are incorporated herein by reference. The salt substitutes may be prepared from raw material ingredients having any suitable particle sizes. Each component may have a single particle size Or may have a particle-size distribution, i.e., a range of particle sizes. The particle size or particle-size distribution of each component is preferably selected such that the resulting admixture of components is homogeneous and substantially free of segregation under storage and handling conditions. For best results, the potassium chloride particles generally have Jarger weight-average size than the weight-average size of the particles of the maltodextrin component. As used herein, the term "particle" includes extremely small pieces of matter and small agglomerates of clusters thereof. For example, good results have been obtained by admixing the following commercially available materials having the indicated typical particle-size distribution (in weight percent as a function of mesh size, U.S. Sieve, with a slash symbol (/) meaning l'to"): Potassium Chloride ("Code 6842-Powder", Mallinckrodt, Inc.) Mesh Wt. z +40 (i.e. > 425 m) 0 -40/+60 (i.e. 250-425,um) 18 -60/+70 (i.e. 212-250 pm) 16 -70/+100 (i.e. 150-212 vm) 33 -100 (i.e. < 150 um) 33 Maltodextrin (Maltrin R M100, Grain Processing Corporation) Mesh Wt. % +40 (i.e. > 425 um) 0 -40/+60 (i.e. 250-425 um) 1 -60/+80 (i.e. 180-250 um) 2 -80/+100 (i.e. 150-180 pm) 4 -10-0/+140 (i.e. 106-150,um) 11 -140/+200 (i.e. 75-106,um) 27 -200/+325 (i.e. 45- 75 um) 34 -325 (i.e. ( 45 um) 21 Good results have been obtained by admixing the two materials set forth immediately above with one or both of the following commercially available materials having the indicated typical particle-size distribution (given on the above basis): : Sodium Chloride ( "Popcorn Salt, Diamond Qrystal Co.) Mesh wt. % +60 (i.e. > 250 m) 0.1 -60/+80 (i.e. 180-250 pm) 0.4 -80/+l00 (i.e. 150-180 m) 17.1 -100/+140 (i.e. 106-150 < *m) 38.0 -140/+200 (i.e. 75-106 > im) 27.1 -200 (i.e. < 75 am) 17.1 Cream of Tartar, food grade (McCormick & Co.) Mesh Wt. % +170 (i.e. > 90 m) 0 -170/230 (i.e. 63 - 90 sm) 3.3 -230/+325 (i.e. 45 - 63 m) 7.1 -325/+400 (i.e. 38 - 45 m) 8.9 -400 (i.e. < 38 m) 80.7 Inspect ion of the above typical size-distribution data shows that typically 100% of Code 6842 potassium chloride will pass a 40-mesh (425 m) screen, while 67% will so pass and be retained on a 100-mesh (150 um) screen; 100 of Maltrin M100 maltodextrin will pass a 40-mesh (425 um) screen, 97% will pass an 80-mesh (180 um) screen, and 77% will pass an 80-mesh (180 um) screen and be retained on a 325-mesh (45 um) screen; ; 99.9% of such "Popcorn Salt" sodium chloride will pass a 6C-mesh (250 um) screen, 99.5% will pass an 80-mesh (180 yam) screen and 92.4% will pass an 80-mesh (180Jum) screen and be retained on a 200-mesh (75 sum) screen; 100% of such cream of tartar will pass a 170-mesh (90jim) screen, 96.7% will pass a 230-mesh (63 fm) screen, and 16% will pass a 230-mesh (63 fm) screen and be retained on a 400-mesh (38 ,um) screen. The particular size potassium chloride may be selected to meet any particular end use application. For example, where "pretzel grade" salt substitutes (i.e., plus 35 mesh (500jim) US sieve size) are desired, potassium chloride having a particle size greater than 35 mesh (500 jim) may be advantageously employed as the starting material. Where "shaker grade" (i.e., minus 35 to plus 60 mesh, that is to say 250 to 500 um) is desired for the salt substitute, potassium chloride having a particle size from minus 35 to plus 60 mesh (i.e. 250 to 500 jim) may advantageously be employed as the potassium chloride starting material. Where a "popcorn grade" (i.e., minus 60 mesh, that is to say less than 250 Jum) size salt substitute is desired, the potassium chloride starting material may advantageously have a particle size of minus 60 mesh (i.e. less than 250 m). The description set forth above regarding relative sizes of the components (i.e., potassium chloride particles having larger weight-average size) is applicable to such grades. The salt substitutes of the present invention are preferably formulated as admixtures of very finely divided particles for use as all or part of the saltflavor-producing component of such snack foods as potato chips (potato crisps), corn chips (corn crisps), popcorn and others which commonly employ salt powder as such component. As a general preference, all particles included in such admixtures will pass a U.S. Sieve 40-mesh (425 pm) screen and the potassium chloride particles will have larger weight-average size as set forth above. The salt substitutes of the present invention are preferably prepared by thoroughly admixing the components as substantially dry solids to form a uniform admixture. The as-produced salt substitutes may be used as is (with or without size classification) or, if desired, may be subjected to size reduction (e.g., crushing) prior to use. Practice of the present invention is illustrated by the following nonlimiting examples. All parts and percentages given throughout this disclosure including the examples and claims appended hereto, are by weight unless otherwise indicated. Unless otherwise indicated, the taste panel results set forth in the examples resulted from the following taste test procedure. Each panelist touched his tongue sequentially to each taste sample, which was supported on a clean paper napkin, made his taste evaluation, and rinsed his mouth with water prior to so tasting each sample. Each panel included at least three panelists. The evaluation or rating system is set forth herein below. EXAMPLES 1-5 Maltodextrin M100 (Grain Processing Corporation) in five separate amounts from about 7 to about 37 parts (mud") and potassium chloride (Code 6842 - powder, Mallinckrodt, Inc.), in five separate corresponding amounts from about 93 to about 63 parts, were thoroughly admixed as substantially dry solids at about 20-25"C., thereby providing five particulate admixtures each of which was substantially uniform throughout. Typical particle-size distributions of these commercially available materials are set forth above. Based on method of preparation, each admixture contained the approximate amounts of potassium chloride (KCl) and maltodextrin ("MD") set forth therefor in Table I under the heading "(I) Invention." Visual observation (without magnification) of each admixture showed that it was substantially identical in appearance to sodium chloride of like size. Each admixture was found to be substantially free-flowing and substantially nonhygroscopic. Samples of each admixture composition were subjected to a taste test for evaluation thereof as a salt substitute. Samples of comparative materials were included in the test. Results of the test are set forth in Table I. TABLE I - TASTE PANEL RESULTS EMI15.1 <tb> <SEP> Source <SEP> of <tb> <SEP> Taste <SEP> Sample <SEP> Taste <SEP> Characteristics <SEP> (a) <tb> <SEP> Salti- <SEP> | <SEP> Bitter- <SEP> | <SEP> After- <SEP> Sweet <tb> <SEP> ness <SEP> Metallic <SEP> Cooling <SEP> taste <SEP> ness <tb> (I) <SEP> Invention <tb> Ex. <SEP> ZKC1 <SEP> %MD <tb> 1 <SEP> 93 <SEP> 7 <SEP> 1.17 <SEP> 2.5 <SEP> 1.67 <SEP> 1.33 <SEP> 0.33 <tb> 2 <SEP> 85 <SEP> 15 <SEP> 1.0 <SEP> 2.0 <SEP> 0.58 <SEP> 0.75 <SEP> 0.33 <tb> 3 <SEP> 80 <SEP> 20 <SEP> 1.17 <SEP> 1.17 <SEP> 0.33 <SEP> 0.58 <SEP> 0.33 <tb> 4 <SEP> 75 <SEP> 25 <SEP> 1.25 <SEP> 0.58 <SEP> 0.42 <SEP> 0.67 <SEP> 0.67 <tb> 5 <SEP> 63 <SEP> 37 <SEP> 2.33 <SEP> 0.58 <SEP> 0.5 <SEP> 0.63 <SEP> 1.0 <tb> (II) Comparative Materials Sodium Chloride (b) 0.83 0 0 0.67 0 Potassium Chloride (c) 0.83 3.17 2.83 2.58 0 Cumberland Nu Salt (d) 1.33 2.17 1.83 2.08 1.08 (a) Each numerical result for each characteristic is the arithmetic average of each panelist's numeral rating made in accordance with the rating system set forth in Table II. (b) "Popcorn Salt", Diamond Crystal Salt Co. (c) "6842 - Powder", Mallinckrodt, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri. (d) "Sweet 'N Low Nu-Salt" Cubberland Packing Corp., Brookyln, NY) Approximate Analysis: 84% KCI, 15% dextrose, 0.08% "CI" (cream of tartar), 0.78 insoluble less than 10 mg of sodium per 100 g. TABLE II - RATING SYSTEM Meaning of Related Taste Characteristic Numerical Saltiness All others Rating O Saltier than salt None 1 High salt-like taste Low 2 Medium sat-like taste Medium 3 Low salt-like taste High 4 No salt-like taste Overwhelming As shown by the taste panel results in Table I, each of the two component salt substitute admixtures of the present invention illustrated by Examples 1-5 has been found to closely approach the taste of common salt (sodium chloride) and more closely approach such taste than each of the other comparative materials set forth therein in at least one taste characteristic. The salt-substitute composition set forth in Example 3 above is contemplated to be the best embodiment of the two component composition of this invention. EXAMPLE 6 A composition of this invention containing potassium chloride, maltodextrin and sodium chloride was prepared in this example. Maltodextrin M100 (Grain Processing Corporation) 20 parts ("MD"); potassium chloride (Code 6842 - powder, Mallinckrodt, Inc.), 65 parts; and USP sodium chloride ("Popcorn Salt", Diamond Crystal Salt Co.), 15 parts, were thoroughly admixed as substantially dry solids at about 20-25 C., thereby providing a particulate admixture which was substantially uniform throughout. Typical particle size distributions of these commercially available materials are set forth above. Based on method of preparation, the admixture contained about 65% KC1, about 20% maltodextrin ("MD") and about 15% Nail. Visual observation (without magnification) of the admixture showed that it was substantially identical in appearance to sodium chloride of like size. The admixture was found to be substantially free-flowing and substantially nonhygroscopic. Samples of the admixture composition were subjected to a taste test for evaluation thereof as a salt substitute. Samples of comparative materials were included in the test. Results of the test are set forth in Table III. TABLE III - TASTE PANEL RESULTS EMI19.1 <tb> <SEP> Source <SEP> of <tb> <SEP> Taste <SEP> Sample <SEP> Taste <SEP> Characteristics <SEP> (a) <tb> <SEP> Salti- <SEP> Bitter- <SEP> After- <SEP> Sweet <tb> <SEP> ness <SEP> Metallic <SEP> <SEP> Cooling <SEP> <SEP> taste <SEP> taste <SEP> I <SEP> ness <tb> <SEP> (I) <SEP> Invention <tb> Example <SEP> 6 <SEP> Blend <SEP> of: <SEP> 1.0 <SEP> 1.53 <SEP> 1.25 <SEP> 1.25 <SEP> 0.5 <tb> <SEP> KC1 <SEP> ... <SEP> 65% <tb> <SEP> MD <SEP> .... <SEP> 20% <tb> <SEP> NaC1 <SEP> .. <SEP> 15% <tb> (II) Canparative Materials 20% NaCl + 80% KC1 (b) 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 50% NaCl + 50% KC1 (b) 1.13 2.75 1.75 2.25 0 "Lite Salt" (c) 1.25 2.75 1.75 3.0 0 (Morton Salt Co.) Coated KCl-Containing Composition (d) 1.25 0.63 0.63 0.63 1.0 KC1 ... 65% (Core) MD .... 20% (Coating) NaCl .. 15% (Coating) Sodium Chloride 1.0 0 0 0 0 ("7851 - Granular", Mallinckrodt, Inc.) (a) Each numerical result for each characteristic is the arithmetic average of each panelist's numerical rating made in accordance with the rating system set forth in Table II. (b) 2-component mixtures within numerical range disclosed in Frank et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,514,296 and Re. 27,981, each prepared by thoroughly admixing granular NaCl and granular KC1 in the indicated proportions until a homogeneous product was attained. (c) Analysis: 49.5t NaCl, 49.5% KC1, 1% other (including calcium silicate, magnesium carbonate, dextrose and potassium iodide). (d) Prepared by spraying an aqueous solution containing 20 parts MALTRIN k M100 maltodextrin ("MD"), 15 parts NaCl and approximately 60 parts water onto an agitated bed of KC1 (Code 6307 - granular, Mallinckrodt, Inc.), 65 parts, maintained about 1200C. and continuing agitation at such temperature until the resulting coated particles were substantially dry. As shown by the taste panel results in Table III, the salt-substitute admixture of the present invention illustrated by Example 6 has been found to closely approach the taste of common salt (sodium chloride) and more closely approach such taste than each of the other comparative materials set forth therein in at least one taste characteristic. EXAMPLES 7 and 8 The procedure of Example 6 was repeated in each of these examples except that the amounts of maltodextrin ("MD"), sodium chloride and potassium chloride were varied over the following ranges: 20-7.4 parts MD, 16-18.5 parts sodium chloride and 74.1-64 parts potassium chloride. The approximate amounts of the components of the resulting particulate admixture compositions of Examples 7 and 8 are set forth below: Approximate Amount of Components (%) Components Ex.7 Ex.8 Potassium chloride 64 74.1 Maltodextrin 20 7.4 Sodium Chloride 16 18.5 The results of visual inspection with respect to appearance relative to the appearance of sodium chloride were substantially the same for Examples 7 and 8 as for Example 6 above. The admixtures prepared in E=amp1W¯7 and Example 8 were found to be substantially freeflowing and substantially non-hygroscopic. Samples of the compositions of Example 7 and Example 8 were subjected to a taste test for evaluation thereof as salt substitutes. Samples of comparative materials were included in the test. Taste panel itemized evaluations by taste category for Examples 7 and 8 appear in Table IV, along with evaluations for the comparative materials. TABLE IV - TASTE PANEL RESULTS EMI23.1 <tb> <SEP> Source <SEP> of <tb> <SEP> Taste <SEP> Sample <SEP> Taste <SEP> Characteristics <SEP> (a) <tb> <SEP> Salti- <SEP> | <SEP> Bitter- <SEP> | <SEP> After- <SEP> Sweet <tb> <SEP> ness <SEP> 1 <SEP> <SEP> Metallic <SEP> Cooling <SEP> taste <SEP> ness <tb> (I) <SEP> Invention <tb> Example <SEP> 7 <SEP> Blend <SEP> of: <SEP> 1.0 <SEP> 0.38 <SEP> 0.63 <SEP> 0.5 <SEP> .5 <tb> <SEP> KC1 <SEP> ... <SEP> 64% <tb> <SEP> MD <SEP> .... <SEP> 20% <tb> <SEP> NaCl <SEP> .. <SEP> 16% <tb> Example <SEP> 8 <SEP> Blend <SEP> of: <SEP> 1.0 <SEP> 1.25 <SEP> 1.38 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> .75 <tb> <SEP> KC1 <SEP> ... <SEP> 74.1% <tb> <SEP> MD <SEP> .... <SEP> 7.4% <tb> <SEP> NaCI <SEP> .. <SEP> 18.5% <tb> (IT) Comparative Materials Homogeneous Blends Prepared by Thoroughly Admixing the Indicated Ingredients in the Indicated Approximate Proportions (%) KCl/Dextrose/NaCl (1) 64 20 16 1.38 0.63 1.38 1.5 2.75 (2) 78.4 2 19.6 1.38 2.5 2.0 3.0 1.0 (3) 74.1 7.4 18.5 1.25 2.5 2.25 3.0 2.0 (a) Each numerical result for each characteristic is the arithmetic average of each panelist's numerical rating made in accordance with the rating system set forth in Table II. NOTE: (A) All samples have a KC1: NaCl weight ratio of 4:1. (B) Comparative Material No. 2 has same D.E. (2.dextrose equivalent units) as that of Example 2. (C) The blends in Example 7 and Example 8 were substantially homogeneous. As shown by the taste panel results in Table IV, the salt substitutes of the present invention illustrated by Examples 7 and 8 have been found to closely approach the taste of common salt (sodium chloride) and more closely approach such taste than the other comparative materials set forth therein in at east one taste characteristic. EXAMPLE 9 A composition of this invention containing potassium chloride, maltodextrin ("MD"), sodium chloride and cream of tartar ("CT") was prepared in this example. Maltodextrin M100 (Grain Processing Corporation) 20 parts ("MD"); potassium chloride (Code 6842 - powder, Mallinckrodt, Inc.), 64.67 parts; USP-sodium chloride ("Popcorn Salt", Diamond Crystal Salt Co.), 15 parts; and cream of tartar (food grade, McCormick & Co.), 0.33 part, were thoroughly admixed as substantially dry solids at about 20-25 C., thereby providing a particulate admixture which was substantially uniform throughout. Typical particle-size distributions of these commercially available materials are set forth above. Based on method of preparation, the admixture contained about 65% KC1, about 20% maltodextrin ("MD"), about 15% NaCl, and about 0.33% cream of tartar ("CT"). Visual observation (without magnification) of the admixture showed that it was substantially identical in appearance to sodium chloride of like size. The admixture was found to be substantially free-flowing and substantially nonhygroscopic. Samples of the admixture composition were subjected to a taste test for evaluation thereof as a salt substitute. Samples of comparative materials were included in the test. Results of the test are set forth in Table V. This taste test was a portion of the taste test employed in Example 6. TABLE V - TASTE PANEL RESULTS EMI26.1 <tb> <SEP> Source <SEP> of <tb> <SEP> Taste <SEP> Sample <SEP> Taste <SEP> Characteristics <SEP> (a) <tb> <SEP> Salti- <SEP> Bitter- <SEP> After- <SEP> Sweet <tb> <SEP> ness <SEP> Metallic <SEP> Cooling <SEP> taste <SEP> ness <tb> (I) <SEP> Invention <tb> Example <SEP> 9 <SEP> Blend <SEP> of: <SEP> 1.13 <SEP> 0.88 <SEP> 1.13 <SEP> 0.75 <SEP> 0.5 <tb> <SEP> KC1 <SEP> ... <SEP> 64.67% <SEP> <tb> <SEP> MD <SEP> .... <SEP> 20% <tb> <SEP> CT <SEP> .... <SEP> 0.338 <SEP> <tb> <SEP> NaCl <SEP> .. <SEP> 15% <tb> (II) <SEP> Comparative <SEP> Materials <tb> 20% <SEP> NÅaCl <SEP> + <SEP> 80% <SEP> KCI <SEP> (b) <SEP> 1.0 <SEP> 3.0 <SEP> 3.0 <SEP> 3.0 <SEP> 0 <tb> 50% <SEP> NaCl <SEP> + <SEP> 50% <SEP> KCl <SEP> (b) <SEP> 1.13 <SEP> 2.75 <SEP> 1.75 <SEP> 2.25 <SEP> 0 <tb> "Lite <SEP> Salt" <SEP> (c) <SEP> 1.25 <SEP> 2.75 <SEP> 1.75 <SEP> 3.0 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> (Morton <SEP> Salt <SEP> Co.) <tb> Coated <SEP> KCl-Containing <SEP> <tb> Composition <SEP> (d) <SEP> 1.25 <SEP> 0.63 <SEP> 0.63 <SEP> 0.63 <SEP> 1.0 <tb> <SEP> KC1 <SEP> ... <SEP> 65% <SEP> (Core) <tb> <SEP> MD <SEP> .... <SEP> 20% <SEP> (Coating) <tb> <SEP> NaCl <SEP> .. <SEP> 15% <SEP> (Coating) <tb> Sodium <SEP> Chloride <SEP> 1.0 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> ("7851 <SEP> - <SEP> Granular", <tb> <SEP> Mallinckrodt, <SEP> Inc.) <tb> (a) Each numerical result for each characteristic is the arithmetic average of each panelist's numerical rating made in accordance with the rating system set forth in Table II. (b) 2-component mixtures within numerical range disclosed in nk et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,514,296 and Re. 27,981, each rapared by thoroughly admixing granular NaCl and granular KC1 the indicated proportions until a homogeneous product was attained. (c) Analysis: 49.5% NaCl, 49.5E KC1, 1% other (including calcium silicate, magnesium carbonate, dextrose and potassium iodide). (d) Prepared by spraying an aqueous solution containing 20 parts MALTRIN M100 maltodextrin ("MD"), 15 parts NaCl a nd approximately 60 parts water onto an agitated bed of KC1 (Code 6307 - granular, Mallinckrodt, Inc.), 65 parts, maintained about 120 C. and continuing agitation at such temperature until the resulting coated particles were substantially dry. As shown by the taste panel results in Table V, the salt-substitute admixture of the present invention illustrated by Example 9 has been found to closely approach the taste of common salt (sodium chloride) and more closely approach such taste than each of the other comparative materials set forth therein in at least one taste characteristic. Comparison of the taste-characteristics ratings set forth in Table V for the admixture of Example 9 with the taste-characteristics ratings set forth in Table III for the admixture of Example 6 shows that the admixture of Example 9 (including CT) was found to still more closely approach common salt in taste than the admixture of Example 6 (not including CT). EXAMPLES 10-12 Additional admixture compositions of this invention containing potassium chloride, maltodextrin ("MD"), sodium chloride and cream of tartar ("CT") were prepared in these examples. The preparation procedure of Example 9 was repeated in each of these examples except that the amounts of potassium chloride, sodium chloride and cream of tartar added in forming the admixtures were as follows: Example 10 - KC1 (71.76 parts), NaCl (8 parts) and CT (0.24 part); Example 11 KC1 (71.64 parts), NaCI (8 parts) and CT (0.36 part); and Example 12 - KC1 (75.62 parts), NaCl (4 parts) and CT (0.38 part). Each of the resulting particulate admixtures was substantially uniform throughout. Based on the method of preparation, the approximate amounts of the components in the conpositions of Examples 10-12 are set forth below: Approximate Amount of Components (%) Components Ex.10 Ex.ll Ex.12 Potassium chloride 71.76 71.64 75.62 Maltodextrin ("MD") 20 20 20 Sodium Chloride 8 8 4 Cream of Tartar ("CT") 0.24 0.36 0.38 Visual observation (without magnification) of each admixture showed that it was substantially identical in appearance to sodium chloride of like size. Each admixture was found to be substantially free-flowing and substantially nonhygroscopic. Each admixture composition was tasted and found to closely approach common salt in taste. The admixture of Example 10 was found to more closely approach common salt from the standpoint of saltiness than the admixture of Example 12. The admixture of Example 11 was found to more closely approach common salt from such standpoint than the admixture of Example 10. It is recognized that different end users may desire different levels of sodium chloride, and accordingly the bes-t salt-substitute composition containing, in addition to potassium chloride and maltodextrin, also sodium chloride (and possibly also cream of tartar) will depend on the desires of a given end user. In general, regarding three component compositions of this invention not including cream of tartar (i.e. compositions containing potassium chloride, maltodextrin and sodium chloride, but not cream of tartar), the salt substitute set forth in Example 6 above is contemplated to be the best embodiment from the standpoint of overall taste appeal while the salt substitute set forth below is contemplated to be the best sodium chloride containing three component embodiment from the standpoillt of cominerc i al attractiveness: : Component Approximate Amount Potassium Chloride 72% Maltodextrim M100 20% Sodium Chloride 8% In general, regarding the four component compositions of this invention including cream of tartar (as usually preferred), the salt substitutes set forth as "A" and "B" below are contemplated to be the best embodiment from the standpoint of overall taste appeal and the best embodiment from the standpoint of commercial attractiveness, respectively: Component Approximate Amounts (%) "A" B Potassium Chloride 71.67 75.67 Maltodextrin M100 20 20 Sodium Chloride 8 4 Cream of Tartar 0.33 0.33 EXAMPLES 13-16 Maltodextrin M100 (Grain Processing Corporation) in four separate amounts of 20 parts each ("MD"); potassium chloride (Code 6842 - powder, Mallinckrodt, Inc.), in four separate amounts from about 79.85 to about 79.2 parts; and cream of tartar, food grade (McCormick & Co., Baltimore, Maryland), in four separate aunts from about 0.15 to about 0.8 part ("CT"), were thoroughly admixed as substantially dry solids at about 20-25 C., thereby providing four particulate admixtures, each of which was substantially uniform throughout. Typical particle-size distributions of these commercially available materials are set forth above. Based on method of preparation, each admixture contained the approximate amounts of iia:iiium chloride (KC1), maltodextrin (" > 'iD" ) and cream of tartar (11Cr") set forth therefor in Table VI under the heading "(I) Invention." Visual observation (without magnification) of each admixture showed that it was substantially identical in appearance to sodium chloride of like size. Each admixture was found to be substantially free-flowing and substantially nonhygroscopic. Samples of each admixture composition were subjected to a taste test for evaluation thereof as a salt substitute. Samples of comparative materials were included in the test. Results of the test are set forth in Table VI. TABLE VI - TASTE PANEL RESULTS EMI32.1 <tb> <SEP> Source <SEP> of <tb> <SEP> Taste <SEP> Sample <SEP> Taste <SEP> Characteristics <SEP> (a) <tb> <SEP> Salti- <SEP> Bitter- <SEP> After- <SEP> ness <SEP> <tb> <SEP> Metallic <SEP> Cooling <SEP> taste <SEP> ness <tb> (I) <SEP> Invention <tb> Ex. <SEP> %KC1 <SEP> %MD <SEP> %CT <tb> 13 <SEP> 79.85 <SEP> 20 <SEP> 0.15 <SEP> 1.17 <SEP> 0.83 <SEP> 1.0 <SEP> 1.0 <SEP> 0.33 <tb> 14 <SEP> 79.6 <SEP> 20 <SEP> 0.4 <SEP> 1.33 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> 1.17 <SEP> 0.5 <SEP> 0.33 <tb> 15 <SEP> 79.4 <SEP> 20 <SEP> 0.6 <SEP> 0.75 <SEP> 1.25 <SEP> 0.83 <SEP> 1.25 <SEP> 0 <tb> 16 <SEP> 79.2 <SEP> 20 <SEP> 0.8 <SEP> 0.83 <SEP> 1.83 <SEP> 1.17 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> 0 <tb> (II) Canparative Materials Sodium Chloride (b) 1 0 0 0.33 0 Potassium Chloride (c) 0.83 3.0 2.5 2.67 0 Cumberland Nu Salt (d) 1.08 2.33 2.0 2.0 0.83 (a) Each numerical result for each characteristic is the arithmetic average of each panelist's numerical rating made in accordance with the rating system set forth in Table II. (b) "Popcorn Salt", Diamond Crystal Salt Co. (c) "6842 - Powder1', Mallinckrodt, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri. (d) ("Sweet 'N Low Nu-Salt" Cumberland Packing Corp., Brooklyn, NY) Approximate Analysis: 84% KC1, 15% dextrose, 0.08% "CT" (cream of tartar), 0.7% insoluble matter,,l.5% water. Represented as containing less than 10 mg of sodium per 100 g. As shown by the taste panel results in Table VI, each of the salt-substitute admixtures of the present invention illustrated by Examples 13-16 has been found to closely approach the taste of common salt (sodium chloride) and more closely approach such taste than each of the other comparative materials set forth therein in at least one taste characteristic. EXAMPLES 17 and 18 The procedure of Examples 13-16 was repeated in each of these examples except that the amounts of maltodextrin ("MD"), cream of tartar ("CT") and potassium chloride were varied over the following approximate ranges: 24.7-9.06 parts MD, 0.3-0.36 parts CT and 75-90.58 parts potassium chloride. The approximate amounts of the components of the resulting particulate uniform admixtures of Examples 17 and 18 are set forth below, based on method of preparation: Approximate Amount of Components (8) Components Ex.17 Ex.18 Potassium chloride 75 90.58 Maltodextrin 24.7 9.06 Cream of Tartar 0.3 0.36 The results of visual inspection with respect to appearance relative to the appearance of sodium chloride were substantially the same for Examples 17 and 18 as for Examples 13-16 above. The admixtures prepared in Example 17 and Example 18 were found to be substantially free-flowing and substantially non-hygroscopic. Samples of the compositions of Example 17 and Example 18 were subjected to a taste test for evaluation thereof as salt substitutes. Samples of comparative materials were included in the test. Results of the test are set forth in Table VII. TABLE VII - TASTE PANEL RESULTS EMI34.1 <tb> <SEP> Source <SEP> of <tb> <SEP> Taste <SEP> Sample <SEP> Taste <SEP> Characteristics <SEP> (a) <tb> <SEP> Salti- <SEP> Bitter <SEP> 1 <SEP> After- <SEP> Sweet- <SEP> <tb> (I) <SEP> Invention <tb> Ex. <SEP> 96KC1 <SEP> MMD <SEP> ZCT <SEP> <tb> 7 <SEP> 75 <SEP> 24.7 <SEP> 0.3 <SEP> 1.38 <SEP> 2.0 <SEP> 2.38 <SEP> 1.75 <SEP> 0.88 <tb> 18 <SEP> 90.58 <SEP> 9.06 <SEP> 0.36 <SEP> 1.13 <SEP> 1.63 <SEP> 1.75 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> 1.0 <tb> (11) wparative Materials Homogeneous Blends Prepared by Thoroughly Admixing the Indicated Ingredients in the Indicated Approximate Proportions (%) (b) KCl/Dextrose/CT (1) 75 24.7 0.3 1.25 2.75 2.5 2.0 2.75 (2) 90.58 9.06 0.36 1.25 3.0 2.75 2.5 1.5 (a) Each numerical result for each characteristic is the arithmetic average of each panelist's numerical rating made in accordance with the rating system set forth in Table II. (b) Sources of the ingredients were as follows - KC1: potassium chloride "6842 - Powder", Mallinckrodt, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri; Dextrose: "AR" grade dextrose, Mallinckrodt, Inc.; CT: food-grade cream of tartar, McCormick & Co., Baltimore, Maryland. As shown by the taste panel results in Table VII, the salt-substitute admixtures of the present invention illustrated by Examples 17 and 18 have been found to closely approach the taste of carrion salt (sodium chloride), as set forth in Table VI, and more closely approach such taste than the comparative XCl-dextrose-CT materials set forth in Table VII in at least one taste characteristic. The salt substitute set forth in Example 2 above is contemplated to be the best embodiment of the sodium chloride free component of this invention. It is contemplated that carrying out production of large-scale (e.g., car°nercial-size) quantities of the salt substitute of the present invention can best be effected by admixing the components in a ribbon blender.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A salt substitute composition which comprises a uniform admixture comprising, as particulate components thereof: (a) potassium chloride and (b) maltodextrin, wherein the dextrose equivalent (D.E.) of the admixture is not more than 10 D.E. units. 2. A composition according to Claim 1, wherein the uniform admixture consists essentially of, as particulate components thereof: (a) potassium chloride and (b) maltodextrin, wherein the dextrose equivalent (D.E.) of the combined amount of potassium chloride and maltodextrin is not more than 10 D.E. units, and wherein the components are present in the percentage amounts set forth: potassium chloride: from about 99 to about 60%, preferably from about 90 to about 70%, and even more preferably from about 85 to about 80%, e.g. about 80% and maltodextrin: from about 1 to about 40% preferably from about 10 to about 30%, and even more preferably from about 15 to about 20%, e.g. about 20%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of said components. 3. A composition according to Claim 2, wherein the average size of the potassium chloride particles is larger than the average size of the maltodextrin particles, for example wherein: (a) the potassium chloride has a particle-size distribution such that about 100% of the potassium chloride.will pass a 40-mesh screen and about 678 will be retained on a 100-mesh screen; and (b) the maltodextrin has a particle-size distribution such that about 100% of the maltodextrin will pass a 40-mesh screen, about 97% will pass an 80-mesh screen and about 77% will pass an 80-mesh screen and be retained on a 325-mesh screen. 4. A composition according to claim 1, wherein the uniform admixture comprises as particulate components thereof: (a) potassium chloride, (b) maltodextrin, and (c) sodium chloride, wherein the dextrose equivalent (D.E.) of the combined amount of potassium chloride, maltodextrin and sodium chloride is not more than 10 D.E. units, and the components are present in the percentage amounts set forth: potassium chloride: from about 91 to about 19%, preferably from about 91 to about 20%, and even more preferably from about 85 to about 65%, maltodextrin: from about 1 to about 40%, preferably from about 10 to about 30%, and even more preferably from about 15 to about 20%, and sodium chloride: from about 0.1 to about 75%, preferably from about 1 to about 50%, even more preferably from about 3 to about 15%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of said components. 5. A composition according to Claim 4, wherein the amount of potassium chloride is about 65%, the amount of maltodextrin is about 20%, and the amount of sodium chloride is about 15%. 6. A composition according to Claim 4, wherein the amount of potassium chloride is about 72%, the amount of maltodextrin is about 20% and the amount of sodium chloride is about 8%. 7. A composition according to any one of claims 4 to 6, wherein the average size of the potassium chloride particles is larger than both the average size of the maltodextrin particles and the average size of the sodium chloride particles, for example wherein: (a) the potassium chloride has a particle-size distribution such that about 100% of the potassium chloride will pass a 40-mesh (425-) screen and about 67% will be retained on a 100-mesh (150s A) screen; (b) the maltodextrin has a particle-size distribution such that about 100% of the maltodextrin will pass a 40-mesh (425 m) screen, about 97% will pass an 80-mesh (180 m) screen and about 77% will pass an 80-mesh (180 p-0) screen and be retained on a 325-mesh (425 fl9 screen; and (c) the sodium chloride has a particle-size distribution such that about 99.9% of the sodium chloride will pass a 60-mesh (250 m) screen, about 99.5% will pass an 80-mesh (180 m) screen and about 82.4% will pass an 80-mesh (180 o) screen and be retained on a 200-mesh (75 m) screen. 8. A composition according to Claim 1, wherein the uniform admixture comprises as particulate components thereof: < a) potassium chloride, (b) maltodextrin, (c) sodium chloride and (d) cream of tartar, wherein the dextrose equivalent (D.E.) of the combined amount of potassium chloride, maltodextrin, sodium chloride and cream of tartar is not more than 10 D.E. units, and wherein the components are present in the percentage amounts set forth: potassium chloride: from about 91 to about 19%, preferably from about 91 to about 20%, and even more preferably from about 85 to about 65%, maltodextrin: from about 1 to about 40%, preferably from about 10 to about 30%, and even more preferably from about 15 to about 20%, sodium chloride: from about 0.1 to about 75%, preferably from about 1 to about 50%, and even more preferably from about 3 to about 15%, and cream of tartar: from about 0.1 to about 0.9%, preferably from about 0.1 to about 0.7%, and even more preferably from about 0.2 to about 0.5%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of said components. 9. A composition according to Claim 8, wherein the amount of potassium chloride is about 71.67%, the amount of maltodextrin is about 20%, the amount of sodium chloride is about 8% and the amount of cream of tartar is about 0.33%. 10. A composition according to Claim 8, wherein the amount of potassium chloride is about 75.67%, the amount of maltodextrin is about 20%, the amount of sodium chloride is about 4% and the amount of cream of tartar is about 0.33%. 11. A composition according to any one of Claims 8 to 10, wherein the average size of the potassium chloride particles is larger than each of the following: the average size of the maltodextrin particles, the average size of the sodium chloride particles and the average size of the cream of tartar particles, for example wherein: : (a) the potassium chloride has a particle-size distribution such that about 100% of the potassium chloride will pass a 40-mesh (425 m) screen and about 67% will be retained on a 100-mesh (150 > 44 screen; (b) the maltodextrin has a particle-size distribution such that about 100% of the maltodextrin will pass a 40-mesh (425 m) screen, about 97% will pass an 80-mesh (180 m) screen and about 77% will pass an 80-mesh (180 JU x) screen and be retained on a 325-mesh (45ffina) screen; ; (c) the sodium chloride has a particle-size distribution such that about 99.9% of the sodium chloride will pass a 60-mesh (250 m) screen, about 99.5% will pass an 80-mesh (180 > n) screen and about 82.4% will pass an 80-mesh (180 m) screen and be retained on a 200-mesh (75 m) screen; and (d) the cream of tartar has a particle-size distribution such that about 100% of the cream of tartar will pass a 170-mesh (90Fwm) screen, about 96.7% will pass a 230-mesh (63 m) screen and about 16% will pass a 230-mesh (63cm) screen and be retained on a 400-mesh (38 m) screen. 12. A composition according to Claim 1, wherein the uniform admixture comprises as particulate components thereof: (a) potassium chloride (b) maltodextrin and {c) cream of tartar, said admixture being free of sodium chloride, wherein the dextrose equivalent (D.E.) of the combined amount of potassium chloride, maltodextrin and cream of tartar is not more than 10 D.E. units, and wherein the components are present in the percentage amounts set forth: potassium chloride: from about 99 to about 59% preferably from about 91 to about 69%, and even more preferably from about 85 to about 79%, for example about 79.6%, maltodextrin: from about 1 to about 40% preferably from about 10 to about 30%, and even more preferably from about 15 to about 20%, for example about 20%, and cream of tartar: from about 0.1 to about 0.9%, preferably from about 0.1 to about 0.7% and even more preferably from about 0.1 to about 0.5t, for example about 0.4%, wherein the percentage amounts are by weight based on the combined weight of said components. 13. A composition according to Claim 12, wherein the average size of the potassium chloride particles is larger than both the average size of the maltodextrin particles and the average size of the cream of tartar particles, for example wherein: (a) the potassium chloride has a particle-size distribution such that about 100% of the potassium chloride will pass a 40-mesh (425,.n) screen and about 67% will be retained on a 100-mesh (150cm) screen; (b) the maltodextrin has a particle-size distribution such that about 100% of the maltodextrin will pass a 40-mesh (425) screen, about 978 will pass an 80-mesh (180 m) screen and about 77% will pass an 80-mesh (180An) screen and be retained on a 325-mesh (45 flX) screen; and (c) the cream of tartar has a particle-size distribution such that about 100% of the cream of tartar will pass a 170-mesh (90pun) screen, about 96.7% will pass a 230-mesh (63 m) screen and about 16% will pass a 230-mesh (63P°ffi) screen and be retained on a 400-mesh (38 p4 screen. 14. A composition according to any one of Claims 1 to 13, wherein said admixture is homogeneous. 15. A composition according to any one of Claims 1 to 14, wherein said maltodextrin has a D.E. in the range from about 5 to about 20 D.E. units, preferably in the range from about 5 to about 15 D.E. units, for example a D.E. in the range from about 9 to about 12. 16. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein said maltodextrin is a water-soluable maltodextrin including e.g. at least a major portion thereof one or more polysaccharides having a degree of polymerization (D.P.) of at least 10. 17. A composition according to any one of Claims 1 to 15, wherein said maltodextrin is a starch hydrolyzate. 18. A composition according to any one of Claims 1 to 17, wherein said maltodextrin has the following saccharide content as determined by high performance liquid chromatography: Saccharides - by Degree Amount of Polymerization From About (%) To About (%) DP1 0.3 0.8 DP2 2.3 2.9 DP3 4.2 5.0 DP4 3.3 4.1 DP5 2.7 3.4 DP6 0.7 6.0 DP7 6.5 8.3 DP8 4.2 5.3 DP9 2.8 3.6 DP10 0.6 2.9 DP (higher than 10) 57 68 19. A The composition according to Claim 18, wherein said saccharide content is as follows: Saccharides - by Degree of Polymerization Amount (%) DP1 about 0.5 DP2 about 2.7 DP3 about 4.3 DP4 about 3.7 DP5 about 3.1 DP6 about 5.0 DP7 about 7.1 DP8 about 4.5 DP9 about 3.1 DP10 about 1.6 DP (higher than 10) about 64 20. A process for preparing a salt-substitute composition according to any one of Claims 1 to 19, said process comprising uniformly admixing potassium chloride and maltodextrin and, optionally, sodium chloride and/or cream of tartar.

Inventors: MEYER, DAVID ROBERT
Applicants: MALLINCKRODT, INC. (A DELAWARE CORPORATION)
Application year: 1984
Main classification: A23L1
IPC codes: A23L1