PROCEDURE AND MEASURING INSTRUMENT BASED ON X-RAY DIFFRACTION FOR MEASURING STRESSES

Abstract: Procedure based on x-ray diffraction for measuring the stress state of metals, in particular austenitic steels. In the procedure the detector surface (10) being inclined about an axis (A-A) lying on the surface of the sample (20) being examined which is substantially perpendicular to the direction of the stresses ( sigma xx) being examined. By means of the detector surface (10) the diameters (2Sax) of the so-called Debye rings in the direction of the surface being examined being recorded at two or several inclination angles ( psi ). The detector surface (10) having arcuate shape, as viewed in the direction (B-B) at right angles against said inclination axis (A-A), and in said procedure being used such an arcuate detector surface (10) elongated in the direction of said inclination axis (A-A) and narrow enough in the opposite direction that an inclination angle ( psi ) of the detector surface (10) large enough in view of the procedure's implementation is feasible. In the procedure a detector surface (10) is used by which the x-rays reflected from the sample are converted to photosignals, and that on the basis of said photosignals the stresses to be measured are determined. Furthermore is disclosed a measuring instrument in which the detector surface (10) is located symmetrically on both sides of said collimator, and that the detector surface (10) is provided with parts (10a, 10b; 41) with which the x-ray radiation incident on the detector surface is converted into photosignals, and that the means further comprises a unit or units with which the stresses to be measured are derived on the basis of the photosignal.

Description: Procedure and measuring instrument based on x-ray diffraction for measuring stresses The present invention concerns a procedure based on x-ray diffraction for measuring stress states in metals, in particular in austenitic steels or equivalent, in the procedure a detector surface being inclined about an axis lying on the surface of the specimen under examination which is substantially perpendicular to the orientation of the stresses to be studied, and by mediation of this detector surface being recorded under two or more angles of inclination the diameters parallel to the surface under examin¬ ation of the so-called Debye rings, or equivalent, and said detector surface having, as viewed in the direction at right angles against said inclination axis, arcuate shape, and in said procedure being employed a detector surface which is elongated in the direc¬ tion of said inclination axis and narrow enough in the opposite direction to make feasible an inclination angle of the detector surface great enough in view of the procedure's implementation. The invention further concerns a measuring instrument for carrying out the procedure, comprising an x-ray tube disposed together with its ancillary apparatus to be rotated about said inclination axis, said axis passing through the point to be examined of the specimen to be examined, and said means comprising a detector surface which has, as viewed in a direction at right angles against said axis, an arcuate shape, preferably that of a circular arc. The need of non-destructive stress measurement has increased power¬ fully in recent years. A non-destructive stress measuring method in more extensive use is based on the diffraction of x-rays in crystalline matter. The greatest shortcoming of the measuring equipment is their complex design and great bulk, impeding their application in field conditions. Stress measuring methos based on x-ray diffraction measure the stresses in the surface of crystalline material. The depth of penetration of the x-rays is on the order of 5 to 24 um. The stresses in the surface are significant with a view to the dura- bility of structures because damage usually starts in the super¬ ficial layers, as exemplified by stress corrosion, brittle fracture, fatigue, etc. According to international estimates, the annual losses from material-technological faults amount to about 50 billion Finnish marks, a remarkable part thereof caused by residual stresses. Residual stresses always arise as a result of inhomogeneous defor¬ mation, which may be a consequence of the following factors, among others: working, temperature differences, phase transformations, different thermal expansion coefficients of different phases. The most important metal treatments in which residual stresses are incurred are welding, heat treatments and machining, e.g. by grinding. Residual stresses are usually divided into two groups depending on their distance of influence: macrostresses and microstresses. The sphere of influence of macrostresses extends, at a minimum, over several grains, whereas microstresses are concentrated in the region of one grain. By x-ray diffraction, macrostresses are measured, which are either compression or tensile residual stresses. Unfavourable from the viewpoint of structures are tensile stresses in the surface; compression stresses on the other hand improve for instance the fatigue strength of metals, and it is therefore often desirable to achieve a compression stress in the surface of metallic components. The most important methods by which a state of com¬ pression stress can be produced are ball blasting, rolling, hammering, and in general any method by which metal surface is plastically deformed. Non-destructive stress measuring methods and means of prior art have been applied in practical conditions comparatively little because no usable measuring apparatus has been available. However, increasing attention is now being paid to residual stresses, because it has been found in practical experiments that residual stresses often have an equally essential significance for the durability of structures as cracks and other discontinuities in the structure. According to a Japanese study, in 80 % of stress corrosion cases the residual stresses that have been produced as a consequence of welding or of other manufacturing procedures have been the stress component causing the damage. Increased size of structures and increased emphasis on their safety (energy and off-shore technologies as their examples) have increased the need also of stress measurements. With a view to eliminating the disadvantages mentioned, the present applicant has disclosed (in the Finnish Patent No. 61248) a so- called improved camera procedure which requires small apparatus and is simple of its design, compared with diffractometer apparatus that was in general use theretofore. There are in principle two types of stress measuring instrument based on x-ray diffraction: camera and diffractometer apparatus. By the camera construction, the simplest and smallest instrument construction is achieved, but its drawback is the comparatively long time required to expose and develop the film. With diffracto- meters, the x-ray intensity is measured as a function of the 2 angle with a proportional or a scintillation counter. One has to run a scan with the counter over a given 2Θ angle range, and this requires an accurate goniometer apparatus: diffractometers are for this reason relatively bulky, complex and expensive instruments in view of field work. It has been possible somewhat to reduce the size of diffractometers and to increase their speed with the aid of so-called location-sensing detectors. Since the use of the camera method disclosed in the Finnish Patent No. 61248 is associated with a comparatively long time required for exposing and developing the film, the object of the present invention is to develop a stress measuring procedure and apparatus OMPI ~ which has a bulk on the same order as the camera construction but which is substantially faster in use. In order to attain the aims stated, and others which will become apparent later on, the procedure of the invention is mainly charac¬ terized in that in the procedure is used a detector surface by which the x-rays reflected from the specimen are converted into photosignals, and that on the basis of said photosignals the stresses to be measured are determined. The apparatus of the invention, again, is characterized in that said detector surface is symmetrically disposed on both sides of said collimator, the detector surface has parts by which the x-ray radiation striking the detector surface is converted into photosignals, and that the means furthermore comprises a unit, or units, by which on the basis of the photosignals the stresses to be measured are derived. The stress measuring procedure and means of the present invention has been derived from the improved camera procedure of the afore¬ mentioned Finnish Patent No. 61248, which has the advantage of ideal Schultz-type focussing, which minimizes the focussing and absorption errors. Another factor which reduces the random errors and many apparatus errors is that in the improved camera procedure instead of the Debye rings their diameters are measured. In the present invention, the film which had to be used in the Finnish Patent No. 61248 is replaced with a scintillation coating, or an equivalent integrated coating circuit, which converts the x-rays into photosignals. Since the intensity of the diffracted x-rays is low and the efficiency for instance of a scintillation coating is only 15 to 20 %, it is to advantage to amplify the light. The light is transferred from the scintillation coating to the ampli¬ fier e.g. by the aid of optic fibres. *$TΪ-ϊi * " OMPI It is possible instead of scintillation coatings and separate electronic units to use detection surfaces prepared by the inte¬ grated circuit manufacturing technique, such allowing without use of optic fibres to achieve directly an electric signal which can be recorded with a fast scanner, subsequently supplying the signal thus obtained to a computer. Instead of said scanner, it is also possible to use directly a digital counter which records the amount of voltage pulses arriving from a detector surface made by the integrated circuit technique. It is possible by this technique to realize a detector surface extending over such a large sector that the slide means to be described later, by which the detector surface would have to be displaced, are not absolutely needed. With the new apparatus design of the invention, by which the same size class is reached as with camera means, the measurement is substantially faster than the camera method - from a few seconds to one minute - contrasting with the time spent in the camera method of prior art, which is upward of five minutes, to which has to be added the time spent in developing and photometrating the film. By the stress measuring procedure based on x-ray diffraction of the present invention, the following questions, among others, can be addressed:- - occurrence and quantity of residual stresses produced at welding and heat treatment; - necessity of stress relief annealing, and it efficiency e.g. for welds and for castings; - aiding the designing of structures subjected to load; - acceptance inspections and reinspections of load-bearing structures (e.g. pressure vessels, reactors, etc.). The portability of the apparatus renders possible the performing of measurements in true field conditions, of which as examples may be mentioned the material questions in the following branches of industry:- - off-shore and maritime technology; - energy production; - heavy mechanical engineering; - mining industry; - process industry. In the following, the invention is described in detail with refer¬ ence made to the schematic diagrams in the attached drawing and to apparatus examples. Fig. IA presents schematically the average spacing of the atomic planes of a given substance in stress-free state, and Fig. IB shows the same situation in the state subject to stress cr - * xx Fig. 2 illustrates the principle of reflection of x-rays from the ob ect under examination. Fig. 3 illustrates the various parameters used in the x-ray procedure. Fig. 4 presents the detector surface shaped like part of a cylinder which is employed in the invention. Fig. 5 presents the block diagram of the procedure of the invention and the principle of carrying out the means of the invention. Fig. 6 presents the general view of the measuring apparatus of the invention in elevational view. Fig. 7 shows the same as Fig. 6, viewed from the end of the means. Fig. 8 presents a detector consisting of scintillation coatings, by which the x-ray radiation reflected from the specimen is received, in schematic elevational view. Fig. 9 shows the same as Fig. 8, viewed from the side of the light- sensitive surface of the scintillation surface. Fig. 10 presents an example of the graphic display obtained in the measurement on the display terminal connected to the computer, the vertical axis being the number of pulses per channel and the horizontal axis, the number of channels. Figs 11A and 11B present schematically an embodiment of the in¬ vention wherein a detector surface is used which can be imple¬ mented by the solid state technology of integrated circuits so that a major part of the electronics required in the equipment is in- herent in the structure of the detector surface itself. In the x-ray method constituting the basis of the present in¬ vention, the spacing d of atomic planes is used as measuring length (Fig. 1). X-rays having the wavelength λ are reflected by the atomic planes when striking the planes under the angle Θ , which is found by Bragg's law (1) 2 d sin θ = λ as Fig. 2 shows. Let us now consider the case depicted in Fig. 1, where the normal stress σ perpendicular against the atomic planes increases the atomic plane spacing from d to d . With the aid of Bragg's law, both distances, d and d , can be calculated using the respective Bragg angle θ» which is measured with the aid of x-ray diffraction, and thereby the normal deformation is calculable by the formula (2) " xx d The corresponding stress σ , which causes the deformation e , is now determinable by the aid of Hooke's law (3) xx = E e , xx OMPI ' where E is the modulus of elasticity. More generally, the x-ray method produces the normal stress com¬ ponent σ in the selected direction x when at least two defor¬ mations e(ψ) in the xz plane are measured (Fig. 3). We find from Hooke's general law: (4) σ = E e( V " e( V xx 1 + V . 2 ... . 2 m sm Ψ.-sm Ψ. where v is the Poisson ratio. According to the general theory of elasticity, the entire stress state is defined when three stress components with different directions are known. When in accordance with the starting point of the invention the beams of the reflections are recorded on a cylindrical or equivalent (Fig. 4) detector surface 10 parallelling the diameter A-A to be measured, the reflections from austenitic steels, e.g. (220) , can be recorded usinf inclination angles ψ. and ψ„ differing sufficiently (equation (4)) so that adequate accuracy is achievable in the stress measurement. Since however the 2Q angle (Fig. 2) is slightly too small, the Debye diameters must be measured with correspondingly greater accuracy in order to attain the accuracy which is characteristic of the common camera methods of prior art, in determination of stress state in steels. This is in fact possible in the improved camera method constituting the basis of the invention because in this method the images made under different inclinations can be focussed, since the absorption factor is not dependent on the inclination, since many apparatus-specific factors introduce no error when diameters are being measured, and since the random errors of the 2ø angle found with the aid of diameter measurement are less than those incurred in measuring vertical beams. It is thus understood that by the improved camera method of the invention in which a special detector surface appropriate for examining austenitic steels (which shall be more closely described later on) is used, it is possible to measure the stress states of austenitic steels with accuracy which is typical when examining the stress states of ferritic steels by common, known camera methods by which determination of the stress states in austenitic steels with adequate accuracy has been impossible heretofore. The means of the invention, presented in Figs 4-9, comprises an x-ray tube 16, disposed to be rotatable about the axis of rotation A-A indicated in Fig. 4. The axis A-A is perpendicular to the strain effect direction of the stress that is to be measured. The axis A-A passes through the point P to be examined of the specimen 20 to be examined or close to this point. For swivelling the apparatus about the axis A-A, the stand includes a rotational axle with round cross section around which a tightenable and lockable ring (not depicted) has been provided, as can be seen more clearly in the said Finnish Patent No. 61248 by the same applicant. In the present invention, the x-ray film of the said Finnish Patent No. 61284 and its cassette have been replaced with a detector surface 10 provided with scintillation coatings 10a and 10b and which has arcuate shape. On the detector surface 10, the scintil¬ lation coatings 10a and 10b are located symmetrically on either side of the x-ray collimator 11, as can be seen in Fig. 5. The x-ray tube 16 comprises, as known in the art, an incandescent cathode 18 and an anode 17 on which the electrons accelerated with the voltage U impinge, generating x-ray radiation. The voltage U is usually in the range from 40 to 50 kV. The anode 17 has been mounted on supporting and cooling structures 19. The anode surface is inclined at the angle a against the axis of the collimator 11. The angle g is appropriately about 6 , by which a favourable concentration of the x-rays X on the specimen 20 is achieved. The x-ray tube 16 has as its anode 17 for instance a Cr anode. The x-ray tube 16 includes cooling means 15 known in themselves in the art. As shown in Figs 6 and 7, the scintillation coatings 10a and 10b belonging to the means are located on the radius R under the angle \_ with the point P to be examined for centre. In conjunction with the x-ray tube 16 have been provided encapsulated fibre optics 12 connected to the scintillation coatings 10a and 10b, and a pre¬ amplifier 13 and a semiconductor detector 14. Fig. 5 displays an embodiment example of .the ' electronics of the means. The scintillation coatings 10a and 10b have been connected by fibre optic light cables 21a and 21b to the photomultiplier 22, which operates as amplifier in a manner known in itself in the art. The intensity of the light signal obtained from the photomultiplier 22 is measured with the aid of a series of Si photodiodes in the block 23. In the said Finnish Patent No. 61248, the equivalent measurement, that is the intensity distribution of the x-rays, was determined from the film with the aid of a photometer. The results of measurement from the Si photodiode array 23 is after the analog/digital converter 24 carried to a multi-channel analyzer 25. The information supplied by the multi-channel analyzer 25 is con¬ ducted to a computer 27, this latter communicating with a graphic results display 28 and a printer 29. Moreover, the computer controls by its program the high voltage source 26 of the x-ray tube for obtaining a suitable operation sequence for the measuring apparatus. In Figs 8 and 9 is seen the more detailed realization of the detector means 10. The detector surface 10 consists of a conductor 35 bent to radius of curvature R and having its centre at the point to be examined, P, of the specimen 20. The conductor 35 has on either side of the collimator 11 of the x-rays X symmetric grooves 34a and 34b, in which the slide parts 30 of the scintillation coatings 10a and 10b have been fitted to be slidable. The scintillation coatings 10a,10b have been established directly on the ends of optic cables 21a,21b e.g. by vaporizing; this is a way OMPI in which small and uniformly distributed grains are obtained. The scintillation coatings consist e.g. of cadmium zinc sulphide (CdZnS), which transforms x-rays into visible light. The light cables 21a,21b are for instance rectangular, with size about 2 x 10 mm. In Fig. 9, the ends 21' of the cables have for greater clarity been drawn in considerable exaggerated size. As shown in Figs 8 and 9, the slide 30 has by its clamp 33 been arrested in the upper position in which the pointed tongue of the clamp 33 locks the ' slide 30 in the position determined by the upper locking groove 31 of the guide 35. It is possible in this upper position to observe x-ray reflections Xa,Xb when the angle 2Θ is about 156-160 . This position is appropriate e.g. for α-Fe, Ti, Al measurements. The slides 30 of the scintillation coatings 10a, 10b can also be moved into the lower position 30', where the clamps 33 lock the slides 30* and their scintillation coatings 10a',10b' in conjunction with the grooves 32 in the guide 35. In this lower ppoossiittiioonn,, wwhheerree tthhee aannggllee 2200 iiss aabboouutt 11:26-130 , it is possible to perform measurements on γ-Fe,Ni alloys. In the following is described in greater detail the improved camera method, which constitutes the basis of the invention, and which shall be further developed in the present invention in order to attain the objects stated in the foregoing. With scintillation coatings 10a and 10b, the diameters 2S of the Debye rings in the direction of the axis are measured directly. From said diameters, the tangent of the reflection angle o •——• 180 - 20 = 20 is obtained from the formula (5) tg 20 = 2 2 D S where D is the distance between the test specimen 20 and the detector surface 10. The deformations are therefore obtained by the formula 2 (6 ) e(Ψ ) = |2 _2 (tg 2Qψ _ tg 2Qo)) and when we substitute this in equation (4), we obtain the operating formula of the procedure of the invention: (7) σ χx = 2 (S Ψ2 - S Ψ1 } • where the stress coefficient is (8) E cos 20 K = 2D(1+v)tg sin 2 Ψ 2 - sin 2 Ψ.. In Fig. 10 is shown the graphic representation obtained on the display screen in the measurements, one graph at a time being displayed. In Fig. 1, the vertical axis is the number of pulses per channel received from the multi-channel analyzer 25, and the horizontal axis represents the number of channels. When the distance S between peaks of the graphs in Fig. 10 is measured for two different inclination angles ψ, the stress can be calculated from the formula (7) presented above. The computer 27 may be programmed to calculate directly the measured stresses on the basis of the formulae presented in the foregoing, and the results of stress measurement are obtainable directly from the graphic dis¬ play and/or the printer 29. As was observed before, the scintillation coatings 10a and 10b described in the foregoing may be replaced with a detector surface which may even extend over the entire sector shown in Fig. 6. The detector surface may be implemented for instance by using the production technique of integrated circuits. In that case, in the structure of the detector surface itself a plurality of those functions may be accomodated which in Fig. 5 are assigned to the electronic units 22,23,24 and 25. In this case no light cables 21a and 21b are needed, either, instead of which from said coating an electric signal is directly obtained on the basis of which the stresses to be measured can be detected. An embodiment example of the invention as just described is schematically outlined in Figs • 11A and 11B, according to which a series 50 = 50-...50 of photo- diodes (N in mumber) is used for the detector surface 10, into said series 50 having been integrated a fluorescent film. When an x-ray X hits said film 46, it emits a photon, and the photodiode 50 in this location admits a voltage, which is supplied e.g. by a square wave generator 40 (not depicted) . Said voltage pulse changes the state of a bi-stable multivibrator 43 or equivalent when an x-ray X excites a photon in the adjacent diode 50 . The multivibrator 43 or equivalent may be incorporated in the inte- grated structure of the detector surface 10, which is arcuate in shape in the manner described above. The changes of state of the multivibrator 43 are recorded by a fast scanner 44, and the electrical signal produced in this way is input to the computer 45. Instead of said bi-stable multivibrator 43 and scanner 44, a digital counter may be directly used which records the number of voltage pulses arriving from the detector surface 10. The principles of operation of the photodiodes 50.....50.. shown in Fig. 11A are as follows. The absorption and sensing of x-rays Xa,Xb takes place in the bulk silicon 46 below the surface of the photodiode array 50. The entire surface of the photosensor region is covered by a passivating layer of 1-um-thick silicon dioxide 49, allowing exposure to the ambient atmosphere. The mechanism sensing the charge developed by current sources in the silicon is derived from the properties of the diode junctions of p+ strips 50-...50.. (diode elements) and the n-type substrate 47. Periodically, the scanning circuit cycles through the array 50, connecting each ρ+ region in turn to bias lines, also called video lines, (not shown) that run along either side of the photodiode array 50. During the short time that contact is main¬ tained for each diode element 50^..SO^, the voltage on the line reverse-biases the diode and forms a shallow depletion layer 48 at the junction. Even after contact with the bias line is broken by the scanning circuit, the depletion layer 48 is maintained by charge stored at its boundaries. The depletion layer 48 thus appears as a capacitor whose stored charge can be dissipated between scans only by current sources in the silicon. Principal sources are thermal dark current and photocurrent arising from photon absorption. The extent to which these sources discharge the depletion layer 48 is sensed at the same time that the diodes 50....50-, are sequentially biased in consecutive scan cycles. At room temperature, the period between consecutive scans, and hence the signal integration time of the photodiodes 50....50^. has an upper limit of several hundred milliseconds so that the dark current alone will not completely discharge the depletion layer 48. In the following are stated the claims, within the inventive idea of which various details of the invention may vary. OMPI

Claims: Claims 1. Procedure based on x-ray diffraction for measuring the stress state of metals, in particular austenitic steels or equivalent, in said procedure the detector surface (10) being inclined about an axis (A-A) lying on the surface of the sample (20) being examined which is substantially perpendicular to the direction of the stresses (σ ) being examined, and by means of said detector surface (10) the diameters (2S ) or equivalent of the so-called α Debye rings in the direction of the surface being examined being recorded at two or several inclination angles (ψ), and said detector surface (10) having arcuate shape, as viewed in the direction (B-B) at right angles against said inclination axis (A-A) , and in said procedure being used such an arcuate detector surface (10) elongated in the direction of said inclination axis (A-A) and narrow enough in the opposite direction that an incli- nation angle (ψ) of the detector surface (10) large enough in view of the procedure's implementation is feasible, characterized in . that in the procedure a detector surface (10) is used by which the x-rays reflected from the sample are converted to photosignals, and that on the basis of said photosignals the stresses to be measured are determined. 2. Procedure according to claim 1, characterized in that in the procedure scintillation coatings (10a,10b) are used for detector surface (10) by which said photosignal is formed, and which is transmitted by the aid of optic fibres to a detector (23) , preferably via an amplifier unit (22) . 3. Procedure according to claim 1, characterized in that in the procedure is used a detector surface (41,42,43) made using the production technique of integrate circuits, in the structure thereof the photosignal being converted into an electric signal, which is recorded with a fast scanner or directly with a digital counter (Fig. 11). 4. Procedure according to claim 2, characterized in that a photo- OMPI s WIPO Λ, multiplier is used for said amplifying unit (22) . 5. Procedure according to claim 2 or 4, characterized in that a series of Si photodiodes or equivalent is used for said detector (23), being preferably cooled for achieving sufficient sensitivity. 6. Procedure according to any one of claims 2,4 or 5, characterized in that the measuring signal obtained from said photodiode series (23) or equivalent is conducted to an analog/digital converter (24) , the digital signal of which is conducted to a multi-channel analyzer (25), and that the output signal of said multi-channel analyzer (25) is fed to a computer (27) which on the basis of a suitable program yields the results of stress measurement in a graphic display (28) and/or over a printer (29) in printed form. 7. Procedure according to any one of claims 1-6, characterized in that in the procedure a computer (27) is used which is adapted to control the high voltage source (26) of the x-ray tube (16) of the means for accomplishing a suitable measuring sequence. 8. Procedure according to any one of claims 1,2,3,4,5,6 or 7, characterized in that said scintillation coatings (10a,10b) have been arranged to be movable into at least two different positions (10a,10a r ) on said detector surface (10) in accordance with the different reflection angles of different materials that are examined. 9. Measuring instrument for carrying out a procedure according to any one of claims 1-8, comprising an x-ray tube (16) which together with its ancillaries has been arranged to be rotatable around the respective inclination axis (A-A) , said axis (A-A) passing through the point (P) to be examined of the sample (20) being examined, and said means comprising a detector surface (10) having arcuate shape, preferably the shape of a circular arc, as viewed in a direction at right angles against said axis (A-A) , characterized in that said detector surface (10) is located symmetrically on both sides of said collimator, and that the detector surface (10) is provided with parts (10a,10b;41) with which the x-ray radiation incident on the detector surface is converted into photosignals, and that the means further comprises a unit or units with which the stresses to be measured are derived on the basis of the photosignal. 10. Means according to claim 9, characterized in that said detector surface (10) comprises a conductor part (35) having arcuate shape, preferably the shape of a circular arc (radius ) with the x-ray collimator (11) located at its centre, that on both sides of said collimator (11), scintillation coatings (10a,10b) or equivalent have been symmetrically provided, that said scintillation coatings (10a,10b) have been connected by the aid of optic fibre cables (21a,21b) to a detector (23), preferably via an amplifier (22) , and that the means has an electronic part, comprising in addition to a detector (23) an analog/digital converter (24) , a multi-channel analyzer (25) and a computer (27) with display and/or output means (28,29). 11. Means according to claim 10, characterized in that said scintillation coatings (10a,10b) have been arranged to be movable along said arcuate guide (35) by slide means (30) which may be locked in conjunction with said guide (35) at least in two different positions (30;30') for measuring various materials (Figs 8 and 9). 12. Means according to claim 10, characterized in that said slide means (30) are lockable in conjunction with said guide (35) with a latch (33) or equivalent to a mating element contiguous with said guide (35), such as a locking groove (31,32) or equivalent. 13. Means according to claim 9, characterized in that the means comprises a detector surface (41,42,43) which has been produced in the manner of the production technology of integrated circuits so that from said detector surface (41,42,43) an electric signal is directly obtained (Fig. 11). 14. Means according to claim 13, characterized in that said detector surface (41,42,43) comprises a series (50) of photodiodes (50....50-.) which is provided with a fluorescent film (46), on which the x-ray radiation (Xa,Xb) to be measured is impingent. 15. Means according to claim 13 or 14, characterized in that the detector surface further comprises a series (43) of bi-stable multivibrators or equivalent. 16. Means according to claims 13,14 or 15, characterized in that the means comprises a scanner (44) or an equivalent digital counter (11) connectable to a computer (45) .

Inventors: KORHONEN MATTI, LINDROOS VEIKKO, KORHONEN, MATTI, LINDROOS, VEIKKO
Applicants: MEXPERT OY, INSINOEOERITOIMISTO MEXPERT OY
Application year: 1984
Main classification: G01B15
IPC codes: G01L1, G01N23