MULTIFOCAL OBJECTIVE

Abstract: A photographic objective (for cinematography, television or still-photography), which is capable of imaging sharply at the same time at least two objects at different distances. This is achieved by placing in front of an objective (1), in its front focal plane (2), a corrective element (3), which is divided into at least two fields, in which the refractive power differs between them. For shading considerations, it is advisable to have the entrance pupil of the objective (1) coincide with the front focal plane (2).

Description: Multifocal objective The present invention relates to an image-forming objective which is capable of forming sharp images of objects at at least two different distances from the objective, there being arranged at one focal plane of the objective a corrective element divided into at least two fields in which the refractive power differs between them. An objective with these properties is known by US-A- 3 588 227 and is designed to serve as a microscope objective. Two objecects in front of the objective are imaged sharply in the focal plane and with the same magnification. According to the principle of the known design, at the image-side focus of the objective, an optical element is arranged which in one half of this focal plane functions as a positive lens, acting to focus the closest object on the focal plane, and in the other half thereof functions as a plane-parallel disc without any net refraction (thus only the refractive power of the objective itself acts on beams in this half) so that the beams from the more distant object are not refracted as much and, because of a choice of suitable dimensions, are focused in the very same focal plane. One object of the present invention is to produce a photographic objective, which is of particular use in moving picture and TV-cameras, making it possible in a single scene to provide sharp images of two objects at different distances, i.e. each with its own depth of field. The image thus combined should have a natural appearance, and if too different optical systems are used, it is particularly important that the unsharp image of one object made by the system which makes a sharp image of the other object, disrupt the sharp image of the other system as little as possible. Otherwise, the unsharp image could create a visible ghost image. If, however, the fuzzy image is of the same size as and is superimposed on a sharp image, the image will be per¬ ceived as sharp. It is previously known to achieve this purpose by using two different objectives and mirror devices. Major mechanical stability problems are encountered in this case, however. Furthermore, it is difficult to make two images coincide exactly, one with a sharp object A and an unsharp object B and the other with an unsharp object A and a sharp object B. The two images of A, one sharp and one unsharp, must be superimposed on each other even if they do not lie in the center of the image surface, which means that the objective must provide the same magnification. One purpose of the invention is to achieve such a consolidation of images, and do this with a single objective, suited to photography, cinemato¬ graphy, TV etc. The objective revealed by the above mentioned patent specification does not constitute a solution to the problem according to the invention. Two objects A and B at different distances will each be sharply imaged in individual halves by the known objective and be of the same size, but at the same time the unsharp images will be of different sizes, and therefore an unsharp and different-sized image of A, for example, will be super¬ imposed on the sharp image of A. This will have a very disturbing effect in a cinematographic picture, for example. In other designs f> relating to photographic objectives, lenses divided into zones are used, similar to Fresnel lenses for instance, and are revealed in, for example, GB-A-335 696 and US-A-2 546 996 and 2 651 237. While the zones do provide sharp images of objects at different distances, the problem of the unequal magnifications of the unsharp ghost images of the different objects has, however, not been attended to and therefore the purpose of the present invention has not been able to be achieved. It is true that US-A-2 651 238 discusses this problem, but the solution there indicated was that the ghost images be so greatly out-of-focus that they do not disturb the sharp images, which can be difficult to achieve except with very small individual depths of field and with a large aperture. The above mentioned purpose and other purposes and advantages are achieved according to the invention which is characterized in an image-forming objective of the type described by way of introduction, the corrective element is arranged in the objective focal plane closest to the object. The unsharp image of an object, which is also giving a sharp image, will be of the same size as the sharp image. It is true that the contrast of the composite image will be poorer than the contrast in a normal image, but the effect thereof will not be dis¬ turbing and can even provide an artistically pleasing soft focus, which is otherwise achieved with special diffusion discs. This effect can be enhanced further by providing one or even both of the fields in the correc¬ tive element with a diffusion disc or the like. The different fields in the corrective element can if required be placed anywhere in the front focal plane of the objective. It is particularly advantageous, however, to arrange the fields symmetrically in relation to the optical axis. In a bifocal design, for example, it is advisable to have the boundary between the fields be a diameter which intersects the optical axis. For more than two objects and fields, the fields can be made in the form of circular sectors with the points on the optical axis. This has the advantage that a diaphragm placed closely thereto will stop down all of the images the same amount. Otherwise, other field distributions can provide a number of special effects. For example, with an annular zone the associated image can be made soft and diffused by stopping down', in many cases to interesting effects. It can be worth mentioning that one of the fields in the corrective element can suitably be open, and in a simple and practical embodiment of a bi¬ focal objective, the corrective element can consist of a thin lens system which is semicircular, and can be considered to be a half fore-lens. Several such corrective systems can be mounted on an arrangement in front of the objective, so that they can be easily interchanged, e.g. in a revolver mounting. If "half fore-lenses" are used, the focusing for one image will be done in the usual manner (as a rule by moving the objective relative to the film plane) , while the focus of the other image is obtained by suitable selec- tion of the fore-lens. Instead of a simple thin system, it is also possible to set in a system with variable refraction, more or less along the lines of a zoom lens. The objective behind it can of course also be a zoom lens, and this may require a certain calculated effort, which does, however, lie within the capacity of the optical designer. The invention is clearly revealed in the figures. Fig 1 shows schematically an objective according to the in- vention. Fig 2 shows a schematic beam path. The composite objective shown in Fig 1 comprises a cine¬ matographic objective 1 with a focal length of 50 mm represented in approximately natural size. The foci are located at F and F' and a film plane has been drawn-in at the rear focal plane. In the front focal plane there is a "half" lens 3 which extends as far as the optical axis, and an iris 4. Since it is wellknown how objectives are designed (see for example Conrady, Applied Optics and Optical Design, parts I and II, New York 1957, Dover), it is unnecessary to describe the seven-lens objective shown. As regards the element 3, it is drawn as a single, thin lens, and such a design is usually satisfactory, especially if the diopter number does not need to be high. An achro- matization may be advisable, although this should be determined in relation to the actual lack of sharpness already there due to the unsharp image superimposed on the sharp image. With a setting for one of the objects, as in the figure, at infinity, the focal length for the lens element 3 should be equal to the distance to the other object, with the lens 3 forming a virtual image at infinity. The functioning of the system may be clearer by applying Gullstrand's formula for refractive power in two combined lens systems: where D_. and D^ are the diopter number (m ) of the systems and δ is the distance between the systems (or their principal-facing planes in Gauss' approximation). If, as here, the lens element 3 (diopter number D_) is at the focus of the composite objective (diopter number Dm ) , the result will be D *■ D.. Thus the corrective element does not effect the focal length of the system. Fig 2 shows a schematic optical path, the main objective being represented by the focal points F and F' and the principal planes H_. and H . The corrective element K is shown as a thin lens with focal point F„. Two rays are shown for an object at F R , and it can be seen therefrom that the front principal plane OMPI of the system coincides with that of the main objective, while the rear principal plane of the system will be displaced towards the object just enough so that the object at F will be in focus at F'. 5. When using a thin lens 3 in the form of a half lens, its edge should be well blackened to avoid light scattering. Experience has also shown that the corrective element must also be well centered in relation to the optical axis. Otherwise the sharp and the unsharp image will not coincide but will be somewhat laterally displaced (net wedge effect) . In a cinematographic objective with a movable or interchangeable corrective element, for pure¬ ly practical reasons there must be a reproducible and exact centering, of the order of a few hundreds of a millimeter (for 50 mm focal length) . In order to avoid difficult vignetting problems, an objective should be used which is computed so that its entrance pupil is located at the forward focus (so- called telecentric objective) . The diaphragm 4 will then also be at the actual entrance pupil of the objective. Fig 1 also shows schematically a revolver mechanism with an axis of rotation 5 and two corrective elements 3 and 3' . Several different corrective elements can suitably be mounted in holes in the revolver disc, leaving one hole empty, so that the objective 1 can also be used as an ordinary objective. As is already pointed out, this revolver mechanism should be made with high precision and the corrective elements be well centered which does not present any insurmountable technical problems, but should be kept in mind during its design. The invention provides a photographic objective which solves the problem of imaging sharply in a single scene objects located at different distances from the camera. OMPI each of the objects having its own depth of field. Such imaging, up to now has in practice had to be done by stopping way down. As an example of what can be achieved with an objective with F = 50 mm, it is possible with a stop-number of 4 (with a resolution requirement of 0.03 mm) to obtain the two depths of field 1.8 - 2.2 m and 6.7 - 19 m (settings 2 m and 10 m) . If one stops down to f-stop 14, the combined depth of field will then be 1.5 m - ∞. A comparable depth of field achieved with conventional stopping-down would require f-stop 28. In addition to the great increase in usable depth of field, one should also mention the hitherto unknown, purely artistic unique effects which can be obtained through the invention, whereby the focus can be con¬ centrated to selected dramatic areas of a filmed scene. In still-photography as ' well, the invention can provide a new means for achieving new artistic effects freed of the limitations previously thought to be unavoidable and dictated by the technology. Ideally, pictures should be true to nature, and the lack of deep focus, which the looking eye unconsciously compensates for by conti¬ nually changing focus, must create an unnatural impres¬ sion, which can be largely eliminated by the invention. • The invention has been illustrated above through the use of an example. The intention has not been to limit the invention, rather it is clear that the person skilled in the art after reading the description will be able to suggest a number of obvious modifications, which are intended to be encompassed by the following patent claims.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. Image-forming objective which is capable of forming sharp images of objects at at least two different dis- tances from the objective, there being arranged at one focal plane of the objective a corrective element divided into at least two fields, in which the refrac¬ tive power differs between them, characterized in that the corrective element (3) is arranged in the objective focal plane (F) which is located closest to the object, and that the entrance pupil of the objective is located at its forward focus in the direction of the object. 2. Image-forming objective according to Claim 1, characterized in that the fields are symmetrically arranged in relation to the optical axis of the objective. 3. Image-forming objective according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that an aperture device is arranged at the forward, object-directed focus of the objective. 4. Image-forming objective according to any one of the - preceding claims, characterized in that the corrective element consists of a single or composite lens, which is halved along a diameter, which intersects the optical axis of the objective. 5. Image-forming objective according to Claim 3, characterized in that the corrective element has a variable focal length. 6. Image-forming objective according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the corrective element is removably mounted. 7. Image-forming objective according to Claim 6, characterized in that a plurality of corrective elements with different focal lengths are mounted in openings in a revolver mechanism. 8. Image-forming objective according to Claim 1, characterized in that one of the fields is provided with a means for reducing sharpness to achieve a so- called soft focus effect.

Inventors: ALFREDSSON HANS, INGELSTAM ERIK, MOELLER BO, OHLSSON PER OLOF, VOGL GEORG, ALFREDSSON, HANS, INGELSTAM, ERIK, MOELLER, BO, OHLSSON, PER, OLOF, VOGL, GEORG
Applicants: SVENSK FILMINDUSTRI AB, SVENSKA ORD AB, AB SVENSK FILMINDUSTRI
Application year: 1984
Main classification: G02B15
IPC codes: G02B13, G02B15, G02B21, G02B27