STRUCTURAL GRAPHICS REPRESENTATION

Abstract: Visual representation of construction projects so as to emphasize project urgencies. Gradations of emphasis are expressed by boldness of shading: shown in monochrome as continuity and thickness of line; in polychrome, by brigthness and hue of color. During construction, urgencies associated with deviations from the schedule -- or variances from the budget -- are emphasizable by depicting overdure (or overly costly) structural increments shaded more boldly than on-time (or within budget) structure. This visual product results from a process or procedure involving identifying and sequentializing work activities of given durations into appropriate order to produce a schedule of the work activities, including start and finish dates, together with their respective resulting structures. This procedure also involves storing and retrieving the foregoing, and related data, such as quantities and costs of work crews or materials, and depiction data for the resulting structure.

Description: STRUCTURAL GRAPHICS REPRESENTATION Technical Field. This invention relates to novel visual representation of both structural and related features of construction projects in their planned and actual construction, and is applicable to buildings, bridges, dams, industrial plants, means of transport, and the like. Background Art. Complex construction projects comprise too many components and involve too many structural and other interrelationships to be kept in mind without visual aids; such aids include drawings of the intended results, graphical and tabular schedules of the order in which components have to become available and be put into place relative to one another, and budgets, for example. However, it is difficult to assemble the pertinent information in an intelligible manner, especially for such diverse audience types as architects, artisans, contractors, engineers, financiers, and others. Also, in international construction projects, diversity of language is often a barrier to common understanding of what has to be done. Techniques for scheduling and control of complex construction projects are well known under such terminology as CPM (critical path method) and PERT (program evaluation and review technique), which make use of visual aids, such as critical path diagrams, Gantt charts, and other graphs. Many textbooks are devoted to the subject, such as J. J. Moder and C. R. Phillips, "Project Management with CPM and PERT," published 1964, by Reinhold Publishing Company, New York, and Chapman & Hall Ltd, London; also R. D. Archibald and R. L. Villoria, "Network-Based Management Systems (PERT/CPM) ," published 1967, by John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, London, and Sydney. With the advent and development of computers, the manipulation of large quantities of data required by these methods has become practicable, and many firms have adopted, developed, and refined their techniques. OMPI - - If, as use of the mentioned graphs suggests, a picture is worth a thousand words, 1000 construction drawings (not an unusual number for a big project) have much the worth of a million words— orth organizing for best communication. Ordinarily, whenever a project requires a large set of drawings, it (and they) are divided into manageable subsets, often with the aid of hierarchical levels of detail in the various drawings, but such subdivided drawings often require additional notations to render their interrelationships fully intelligible to individual viewers. Project control would be greatly enhanced by more readily available and understandable pictorial and related visual representations. Disclosure of Invention. The inventive product is novel depiction of structures of construction projects; the inventive method produces such such depictions; and the invention extends to uses thereof, in both transient and non-transient displays. A primary object of the present invention is to provide novel visual representation of structural and related data in and for construction projects, especially complex ones. Another object of the invention is to make intelligible by visual display the scheduled status of chosen structural features at any given stage in a construction project. A further object of the invention is to focus attention upon actual status, versus scheduled status, of structural features in visual depiction of projects under construction. Yet another object of this invention is to depict structural features of a construction project, whether scheduled only or actually being constructed, in such manner as to convey urgency information about completion deadlines and other pertinent matters non-verbally. A still further object of the invention is to provide, for use in the management of construction projects, a data base comprising indicia of sequentialized work activities, indicia of discrete increments of structure collocated with the work activities, and depiction data for such increments. OMPI In general, the objects of this invention are accomplished, by way of a systematic procedure of structural graphics representation for construction projects, wherein selected structural features are characterized according to urgencies of time, cost, etc. related to their construction. Such method of characterization emphasizes urgencies, as by depicting structural features due to be started or due to be completed by any specific time in the construction schedule more boldly than structural features not due at that time. At any given time during actual construction, structural features due (or overdue) for completion can be emphasized in similar manner, with litle or no resort to verbal representation. Such depiction method is inherently helpful in reducing time, effort, and cost of project management. ' In summary detail, one is enabled to attain those objects by a sequence of steps including identifying, in advance, discrete increments of structure from start to finish of a given project, depicting the structural increments as in construction drawings, identifying discrete work activities essential to constructing the respective structural increments, assigning durations to the given activities, sequentializing the work activities among themselves, calculating start and finish times for the respective activities so sequentialized, preparing a time (and data) schedule from start to finish of the project, and storing the foregoing for retrieval. Thus, the invention utilizes, in data base management for construction projects, a time schedule as a key by which to relate indicia of sequentialized work activities and discrete increments of resulting structure, as well as other similarly related data. This enables data associated with either the work activities or the structural increments to be related to the other by way of the time schedule—whether expressed in days, weeks, or other units of time—and enables structural increments to be depicted with gradation in emphasis, keyed to urgencies of time or to other data items, such as cost. OMPI IPO Brief Description of Drawings. Fig. 1 is a block diagram of steps taken in practicing the present invention; Fig. 2 is a block diagram of further steps taken in practicing this invention; Fig. 3 is a largely schematic diagram of apparatus useful in practicing the invention; and Fig. 3A is a schematic diagram of a network of workstations, each comprising apparatus such as is shown in the preceding view. Fig. 4 is a project-scheduling network diagram of activities for a portion of a building construction project; and Fig. 5 is a construction project schedule corresponding to the scheduled activities diagram of the preceding view. Fig. 6 is a substantially conventional construction drawing of the same scheduled portion of a building construction project; Fig. 7 is a similar drawing of the same building portion, but shaded relative to the scheduled start of the construction, according to the present invention; and Fig. 8 is a similar drawing of the same building portion, but shaded according to the project status well into the schedule, with part of the scheduled construction overdue for completion. Fig. 9 is a schematic diagram of interrelationships between and among data elements useful according to this invention; and Fig. 10 is a schematic diagram showing steps in assembling a composite depiction of resulting structure, with emphasis shading. Additional objects of the present invention, together with methods and means for attaining the various objects, will be apparent from these accompanying diagrams and the following description, all presented by way of example rather than limitation. Modes for Carrying Out the Invention. Fig. 1 relates procedural steps of this invention in more detail. The usual preliminary task is to formulate the design of a given construction project, as in terms of specific design criteria. The intended construction is subdivided into successive stages, corresponding structural drawings are prepared, and are subdivided into discrete increments of structure. Likewise, kinds of work activity essential to the construction are identified and are broken down into discrete work activities. Optionally, as the broken lines suggest, related data may be associated with work activities (e.g., budgeted labor costs, crew sizes, and availability) or with structural increments (e.g., budgeted materials costs, quantities, and availability). Discrete structural increments and work activities are collocated; that is, cross-referred to each other, in a one-to-one relationship. Too, as noted in Fig. 1 , durations are assigned to respective work activities, which are sequentialized among themselves in their logical order (i.e., which of them must precede which, and both early and late start and finish times are calculated for those activities. The resulting time data and the collocated discrete work activities and structural increments, together with other related data, are then used to generate a time (and data) schedule for the entire construction project from start to finish, and the schedule and related information are stored for subsequent retrieval, as in electronic memory means. It will be understood that, in generality, the foregoing steps can be carried out by hand, with pencil and paper, but that large construction projects are so complex that it is convenient to have the assistance of inanimate apparatus, such as a digital computer, capable of speeding up the necessary logical and mathematical calculations and, optionally, the actual drafting process, so as to complete them within a reasonable time. Storage in electronic memory means follows naturally upon such machine-assisted steps. OMPI -δ- Fig. 2, in similar manner to Fig. 1 , shows subsequent steps that, although also conceivably performable by hand, actually are reasonably feasible only with similar machine assistance. Indeed, Fig. 2 begins by showing the storing of information from Fig. 1 twice: once in a read-only memory, which represents the scheduled construction, and additionally in a read-write memory that can be updated from time to time in accordance with actual construction during the project. One or more intermediate types of memory (not shown) , that may be overwritten only after due precautions are met may be interposed to represent target schedules bearing authorized changes from the original schedule, as will be readily apparent. However, in the interest of clarity no such embodiment is described further here or illustrated in the drawings, nor are means shown for storing various operating programs, or for enabling essential calculation to be performed, as is conventional. As shown in Fig. 2, the read-write memory is updated during the project with whatever departures from the schedule actually occur in the process of construction. The operator may retrieve upon request from either memory a structural depiction, as of any selected time within the schedule, characterized by time urgency or other data so stored. Also, the two memories can be compared in any such regards, to disclose any discrepancies between the two, as where actual construction is ahead of schedule (or under budget) or--usually more important—is behind schedule (or over budget) , for example. Furthermore, either of the memories can be compared with one or more intermediate memories to identify any differences between original or current plans and interim target schedules—and to depict such differences in terms of the corresponding structure. A record of successive target schedules or of successively amended records of the status of actual construction amounts to a history of the project, somewhat like an audit trail of financial transactions, with the added advantage of being reproducible here in pictorial, rather than numerical, form. OM As indicated further in Fig. 2, according to this invention the structural increments of interest (or related to other items of interest) are depicted so as to emphasize their status, such as urgency of timeliness or cost, as well as annotated (if desired) with related signs, numerical data or verbal comments. Such emphasis is accomplished by what is called "shading" and more particularly as quasi-mnemonic "boldness" of shading to signify comparable (but unlike) characteristics in monochromatic or polychromatic depiction. Because of black's optical dullness it is especially suitable for both monochromatic and polychromatic depiction of structural features already completed or otherwise not requiring emphasis. As shown subsequently, boldness of monochrome shading is conveniently represented by line thickness and continuity; thus, continuous or solid lines are bolder than broken ones, and thick lines are bolder than normally thin ones. In polychrome, shading is represented by hue and/or brightness of color. Structure overdue for completion takes the boldest representation, such as a double-thick line in monochrome, or the boldest color (e.g., red) in polychrome. Those structures with later due dates drop off incrementally to less bold colors, as in spectral order (e.g., orange, yellow green, forest green, sky blue, navy blue, violet—or dark brown); for which suitable monochrome analogs are long-dash, short-dash, and dash-dot double-thick lines, followed by long-dash, short-dash, and dash-dot normal or single-thickness lines, respectively. For convenience, these shading boldness relationships are summarized in the table below, although it should be recognized that others, may be substituted with like effect, as by subdividing the spectrum more finely (or less so), or by adopting some other convention for shadings of boldness, or even other ways of showing gradations of visual emphasis. The contents of the table are not merely exemplary, however, but represent an example of a preferred structural depiction arrangement or scheme. TABLE 1 : PRIORITIES AND SHADINGS PRIORITIES POLYCHROME MONOCHROME Greatest Red Continuous double-thick Next greatest Orange Long-dash double-thick Not so great Yellow Green Short-dash double-thick Intermediate Forest Green Dash-dot double-thick Less Sky Blue Long-dash single thickness Even less Navy Blue Short-dash single thickness Least Dark Brown Dash-dot single thickness Such graduated boldness of shading of the structural increments themselves conveys (at a glance) language- independent information that otherwise could be conveyed—if at all—only by relatively less effective methods. Of course, more or fewer gradations could be used, as could other shading methods in color or in monochrome. Users differ in preference for monochrome or polychrome emphasis of lines, but where area shading is desired the usual choice is color. A useful supplementary representational aid when the depiction is transitory, as on a suitable video screen, is an intensity difference sufficient to be relatively readily distinguishable from existing shadings. Whether continuous or intermittent, such differences are useful to emphasize areas, lines, or points of particular interest. For example, features to be removed may be illustrated as above, but intermittently at reduced (or no) intensity, all or part of the time. A blinking or flashing of the video display, such as between normal intensities, is useful for noting the presence of slack or float time in an activity for constructing a given structural increment. Such blinking or flashing is also analogously useful to show temporary features (e.g., forms) that are both placed and then removed during the course of the project. -gJlE3 OMPI n - * ? - The showing of such temporary features preferably will alternate between the respective shadings characterizing their priorities of placement and removal, with the latter preferably diminished in intensity. Another use of blinking or flashing of the display, such as between normal and higher intensities, is to draw attention to structural features characterized by some data element (e.g., availability of work crews or materials, budgeted or actual costs or variances between them, or progress payments) not usually found in drawings. Verbal or graphical addenda may be included to similar effect, optionally with the aid of arrows, flags, or other pointers. Fig. 3 shows computer apparatus 30 comprising components to enable this invention to be practiced with a high degree of machine assistance. Despite the largely schematic diagram here, persons ordinarily skilled in the art of digital computers will readily understand what is meant, so as to become enabled to practice this invention with relative ease. Shown centrally is video display means, which conveniently includes a video screen, for relatively transient displays and print-out means (printer or plotter) for non-transient or "permanent" displays of both structural graphics and related alphanumerics. Connected to the video means is electronic memory means, including both read-only and read-write memories, as previously described. Connected thereto are a central processing unit (CPU) and input/output control means, as is conventional. The input/output means conveniently includes not only the customary keyboard but also an electronic drafting surface or "bit pad" to transmit into the memory drawings made thereon as with the indicated stylus. Alternatively, a light pen may be used similarly in conjunction with the screen. Not shown is conventional scanning means that may be used with pen-and-ink construction drawings to convert them into readily stored digital signals. The foregoing apparatus may be of general-purpose type or may be dedicated especially to practicing this invention. And, though the mentioned video means (screen and recorder) is two-dimensional, it can simulate three-dimensions, as by well known isometric and perspective representation methods suitable for presenting structural features of construction projects such as are dealt with here. Alternatively, the display may actually be three-dimensional (e.g., holographic) subject to cost, space, and technical considerations. Also, displays that "zoom" from small to large detail are helpful. A display that rotates the depicted structure about an axis (vertical or otherwise) is well within the skill of the art and is capable of showing the display as it would appear upon contrariwise movement of an observer's viewpoint. Fig. 3A shows schematically a number of computer workstations 30 connected together into communications network 35, which itself is useful according to this invention. One or more workstations 30 can readily be made available to major functional groups involved in any construction project (e.g., proposal, design, scheduling, procurement, construction, and startup); or trades (e.g., concrete, carpentry, electrical, plastering, and plumbing) ; and at levels of management from foremen through intermediate supervisory personnel to the project manager; and optionally even to higher line managers and possibly to pertinent staff personnel (e.g. financial, legal, or writers) . This supplementary diagram fragmentarily suggests representative availability of such apparatus in actual construction operations, specifically to the architect, designers, scheduler, contractor's managers, subcontractors, and customer. Of course, authority to revise the design or the schedule and update work performed and structure built should be limited to authorized persons. Great care should be taken for security of the data base in any event. It will be understood, of course, that such networking is well within the current state of the art and yet may take advantage of future improvements. This invention lies more in what is done than in specific means for accomplishing it. The computer means itself is also well known in the art. Standard mainframes, such as are made by IBM or by Digital Equipment or other manufacturers, are fine for this purpose, but minicomputers or even microcomputers can be substituted. As an example, in Fig. 3A, several individual work stations 30 preferably have self-contained computer units or "nodes" with their own "memory banks and so interconnected that what is stored in the memory of each is available to every other unit, and that unavailability of any unit does not interrupt the network but only renders the unit and its memory unavailable until again on line. Also desirable are high resolution of display so as to show the structural increments in considerable detail, and rapid response because of the quantity of detail to be processed. Fig. 4 shows a project scheduling network diagram resulting from sequentialization of work activities for constructing a minor portion of a building as shown in subsequent diagrams. About a dozen activities (designated by arrows) suffice to go from early to late stages, such as excavation, forming, placing, and stripping of foundation, stairs, and landing. The respective activities are designated by An above the arrow, where n is a numerical indicator of a given work activity; and by (d) below the arrow, where d is the number of days from start to finish of such activity. Thus, the first activity arrow is marked Al/(5); the 1 indicating that it is the first activity, and the 5 indicating that it is to require five days. Thus, Fig. 4 shows the critical path as a horizontal line from left to right, made up of arrows to which are juxtaposed activity indicia A1 , A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A9, A10, A12, and A13; whereas activities A2, A8, and A11 all require less time to complete than do one or more parallel activities and so have slack time available to them, as appears more definitely in the next view. It will be understood that activities may be (and often are) identified in more complex manner (e.g., with indicia of trade type or carrying other information) , but these simple indicia will suffice here. Tabulated below are the work activities and indicia. TABLE 2: EXAMPLE OF WORK ACTIVITIES INDICIA DESCRIPTIONS A1 Excavate for foundatiqn slab A2 Place reinforcing for foundation slab A3 . Place forms for foundation slab A4 Place foundation slab concrete A5 Place reinforcing for walls A6 Place forms for walls A7 Place wall concrete A8 Strip forms already placed, backfill A9 Place forms for stairs and landing A10 Place reinforcing for stairs A11 Place reinforcing for landing A12 Place stairs and landing concrete A13 Strip remaining forms Fig. 5 shows a resulting construction schedule, with a time scale (in days) at the top, and at the left a list of the various activities by indicia (An, where n is the number assigned to the given activity) plus duration (in days). Activity early start and late finish dates (days), respectively, are indicated in Fig. 5 by the left and right ends of the horizontal bars extending to the right of the respective activity indicia. Inside the bars are both forward and backward slant (or slash) characters, whose leftmost ends indicate the respective early and late start times and whose right ends indicate the respective early and late finish times, as stated in the Legend included in the upper right corner of the drawing. A bar completely cross- hatched by the oppositely slanted characters indicates the duration of an activity without slack, whereas a bar that is not completely cross-hatched indicates presence of slack. Thus, activity A2 has one day of float or slack, activity A8 has seventeen such days, and A11 has three of them. Fig. 6 shows in sectional elevation " the corresponding portion of the scheduled construction project, comprising a plurality of structural increments uncharacterized as to the actual or scheduled order in which they were (or were to have been) completed, together with forms, reinforcing bars, etc. to be used in the construction. Included are a foundation, walls, stairs, and a landing—all rather fragmentarily shown—but adequate for an illustrative example. In more complex drawings, features to be shown might be grouped by type of work activity, location on a drawing, or by subcontractor, for example. As will be apparent, ordering or ranking of pictorial structural increments may be by starting times or completion times; or both can be shown alternately, or on two separate display devices simultaneously. For convenience, examples here utilize completion--rather than starting—times, as a matter of choice. Shown in normal continuous lines (middle left and upper right) are adjacent structural features not part of the present schedule. Fig. 7 depicts the same structural portion (of Fig. 6) shaded in monochrome according to the scheduled activitiy completion times (of Fig. 5). Scheduled first as most urgent is the excavation for the foundation, shown accordingly in continuous double-thick lines (which in polychrome would be red, but of merely single thickness). Scheduled next are reinforcing bars—horizontal for the foundation and vertical for the walls--which appear in long- dash thick lines (orange if in color). Next, in short-dash double-thick lines (cf. yellow green) is the concrete foundation itself. Scheduled next are wall forms, shown in thick dot-dash lines (cf. forest green); forms, because they are to be removed subsequently, should appear additionally intermittently in diminished intensity, preferably coded to their removal deadline, if in an electronic video display (not feasible in this hard copy) . -£URE4 OMPI ^ ■ K Vvlrø Fig. 7 shows structural increments resulting from the next few activities in long-dash single-thickness lines (cf. sky blue): the foundation walls (formed and placed, stripped and backfilled) . Because of the slack in the stripping activity, it may well appear alternately as an item of least urgency (dot-dash, cf. dark brown). Forms for both the stairs and the landing, and the reinforcement for the stairs, scheduled next, are shown in normal thickness (thin) short-dash lines (cf. navy blue). The concrete stairs and landing, as well as final stripping, all being of like (low) priority, are dot-dashed (cf. dark brown) single-thickness or non-bold lines. Fig. 8 shows in similar fashion the same structural portion, in its actual stage of construction on a given day (T29, the start of the second half), but shaded to emphasize construction lagging the schedule. Reference to Fig. 5 indicates that the first six of the activities were to have been completed by T28. A1-A5 are done, so their resultant structural increments are shown in continuous black ' single- width lines (similar if in color), confirming that the project is on schedule to that extent. However, Fig. 8 shows by its use of solid double-thick lines (cf. red) that A6 (placing forms for the walls) is behind schedule and, thus, very likely to delay subsequent activities, especially those having no scheduled slack (A7, placing wall concrete; A9, forms for stairs and landing; and A10, stairs and landing concrete). Such visual emphasis encourages prompt remedial measures, such as shortening the duration of one or more of the activities, as by enlarging work crews or paying them for overtime—doubtless at increased cost, which can be similarly highlighted in a separate depiction as an aid to decision-making. In Fig. 8 slack-rich form-stripping step A8 is shaded like A13 (the one-day final form-stripping step) because of their identical completion dates, shown in Fig. 5. Activity -5.URE OMPI < ι?o A11 (placing landing reinforcing) , which also has some slack, is shaded like the similar step of placing reinforcing for the stairs because they also have identical required completion dates. According to this invention, as already noted, such slack could be shown readily in a video display—not here—by flashing between the respective shadings for the activity's scheduled early start and permissible late finish. Two-stage flashing to indicate slack preferably differs from that for showing placing and removal of a structural feature by being of equal intensity in both stages of its showing (compared with a diminished intensity in one of the stages for a removal feature). Fig. 9 shows schematically main data elements under headings: SCHEDULE, ACTIVITIES, EMPHASIS, STRUCTURAL INCREMENTS, and COSTS. The elements are shown in the form of alphabetical indicia, which in general form are Tn for schedule times, Ai for work activities, Ek for shading emphasis, Sj for structural increments, $Ci for crew costs, and $Mj for materials costs. In specific occurrences numbers are substituted for the appended lower-case letters, and in the drawing such numbers are more or less sequential. Mentioning of the data elements frequently by name (rather than by indicia) in further discussion of this diagram will be understood as compatible (rather than in conflict) with the principle that the indicia stand for their respective elements in this data base and are often meant here when the context fails to indicate otherwise. Interrelationships among the indicated data elements in Fig. 9 are shown by lines (of various degrees of boldness) joining them. Primary linkage between a given discrete work activity, on the one hand, and the increment(s) of structure produced by that activity, on the other hand, are represented in bold horizontal lines. Each activity (Ai) has linked to it, as shown by ordinary lines, its duration (Di), its crew requirement (Ci), materials requirement (Mi), and its description (....)i—all expressed generally here. Structural increments usually are in a many-to-one relationship to their source drawings, and in Fig. 9 they all are linked to only one drawing (G1). Each structural increment (represented generally by Sj ) has similarly linked to it, its depiction data (DDj ) derived from the source drawing, and usually a verbal description (...)j. Descriptions of corresponding activities and structural increments may be merged into composite descriptions, if desired, as may activity and structural increment indicia, but the data base is more versatile if these distinctions are maintained. Degrees of detail, as within the depiction data, for example, enable an operator to display structural depictions in greater or lesser detail, as desired. In Fig. 9 the duration of each work activity is linked by dashed lines at the left to the time schedule (shown fragmentarily as a succession of time units T1 to T12...Tn). One such linking line appears for each time unit required by the activity duration. Early and late times- where not identical—would unduly complicate this diagram and, thus, are omitted here for clarity). Successive time units are bracketed into five-unit intervals for convenience of illustration and as an example of a common range (a 5-day week) . Other user-defined ranges may be substituted as the user may prefer for review of the project or schedule, such as shorter ranges in the near term and longer ones further away, as well as other degrees of emphasis. Here the listed activities (A1 through A4) and their durations are those of the same example treated in Fig. 5 and corresponding text. The middle heading in Fig. 9 is EMPHASIS, a concept most often based upon time urgency but sometimes on some other connected data element, such as cost. Here emphasis indicia (for degrees of time urgency or data variance) E1 , E2, E3,...Ek scale downward, linked to both the duration indicia and the time schedule by broken lines, to indicate that the linkage is subject to changes as time passes. Successive time units (e.g., days) may be deemed to define a fixed reference system, and urgency emphasis a variable one. Also commonly in many-to-one relations are types (and numbers) of workers and materials, and it is convenient to cross-reference crew and materials requirements, one-to-one, to their respective work activities, and through them to their structural increments. Crews and materials are linked directly to their costs—shown generally as $Ci and $Mj at the lower right, below their individual values—and (at the upper right) to their totals, $C and $M. In such a data base representation (as Fig. 9) any given time intersects, somewhat indirectly, at least one activity (usually many more) and structural increment(s) , whereupon the array of time intersections with activities and structures constitutes a calendar of the project and may be reconstituted more directly as such—as suggested in dashed lines on the drawing. Moreover, as previously noted, the scheduled and actual construction times for the various structural features provide calendars for them in like manner, and comparison of the structures as scheduled and as actually built readily highlights departures of construction from the original schedule--which may have to be revised from time to time. Fig. 10 shows, in schematic block form, representative steps for using such a data base to produce a composite depiction of structural increments shaded—-whether in monochrome or polychrome—to indicate graded degrees of emphasis, here by completion times. An operator of computer apparatus appropriate for such use keys in a specific time "Tm" during the project schedule when the operator or another person would like to see a visual depiction of resulting structure (a) scheduled to be in place by then, (b) currently due for completion, and (c) to become due by one or more later times. Selected time Tm is usually stated as a given number of working days from the beginning of the project construction, but it may be a given date for conversion into a number of such days (or other time units) in accordance with the number of work days per week and allowing for holidays, etc. Alternatively, Tm may be an interval of several days, but for this example will be considered as a single day. The operator also keys in—or calls up, if already stored—desired time emphasis intervals for (b) and (c). The intervals may be alike (e.g., a work week of a certain number of days) or may be unlike (e.g., 3 days, 5 days, 10 days) and are represented here by letters x, y, and z. All later activities may be grouped under a single heading or, if desired, the last stated interval may be left open-ended to include such activities to the end of the schedule. The time intervals will determine gradations in boldness of shading in the structural display, as explained below. Keying in of specific time Tm triggers retrieval of a schedule (c . Fig. 5) that shows, to look up each work activity essential to the construction, whether it should be completed before time Tm, or (if not) be completed by time Tm, or within the given numbers of time units after time Tm. Activities with finish times before Tm are so identified (bottom row in diagram) , then all the collocated structural increments are identified from their relation to those activities (as by being looked up in a stored A, S array), then their corresponding depiction data are called up and are used to depict the structural increments together. Also, as indicated along the upper part of Fig. 10, activities with completion times within the respective intervals after Tm are identified, as are their collocated structural increments. Then depiction data (stored as attributes of the structural increments) are called up for each structural increment in each such grouping, preferably triggered automatically by the preceding steps, although alternatively keyed by the operator. In order for the structure displayed via such groups of depiction data to be suitably shaded, instructions must be keyed in (or be called up as previously stored) to affect the respective groups of depiction data accordingly. Such instructions go also to the completed structure. Alternative polychrome and monochrome shading scales are provided (much as in Table 1 ) so that those structural increments predating time Tm will appear in single-line black, and structure due for completion on (not before or after) Tm will show in red if polychrome (otherwise in bold solid lines). In like manner, structure due within the next x days will appear orange (or in bold long dashed lines), within y days thereafter in light or yellow green (or bold short dashes), within the next z days in dark or forest green (or bold dash-dot lines), and from then until the end of the project in a more subdued shading, such as light blue (or single-thickness dashes)—not shown in Fig. 10. Though each such structural depiction may also be shown separately, a composite of all of them will usually appear, as indicated at the lower right. Placement of suitable relational links (shown in part in Fig. 9) in digital electronic computer memories (as via memory addresses) is well known in the art and is within the skill of software designers. Also within programming skill are the steps of converting drawn elements of structure to depiction in another medium such as a video display, shading such display with reference to a schedule or related time characteristics, comparing scheduled and actual items and determining differences between them, and annotating a display of structural features graphically with arrows or other symbols and optionally with textual information. The same is true of devising ways of varying such displays by diminished or enhanced intensity, blinking or flashing between normal and varied intensity (including on and off) and other visual modifications that will come to mind. The drawings to be stored electronically need not be prepared differently from what draftsmen normally provide for construction projects; indeed, some customary annotation of relationships can be eliminated because they will be apparent in the video display. This is not to say that improvements in draftsmanship will not come in handy in Examples of improvements include performing the drafting with implements adapted to store , a drawing as soon as it is made (or while it is being made), and utilizing prepared graphical or pictorial symbols for components that can be called up from storage rather than being drawn from scratch every time they are required, also keying the views so that they can be combined into more comprehensive illustrations—all as are becoming well known in the art of computer-aided drafting. These and other measures reduce an already large memory requirement and permit advantageous reduction in paper storage, use, and disposal. It should be understood that "structural" is used generally in this specification to denote whatever makes up a constructed work (building, bridge, etc.) rather than being interpreted in a more limited structural engineering sense. Thus, electrical, plumbing, and finishing features of construction, for example, may well be treated as structural elements in the practice of the invention. Also, collateral activities essential to a project, such as hiring personnel, buying or leasing equipment, expediting delivery, and receiving materials on site, are related data elements. Time units other than days may be more suitable for some projects. The assigned duration for any work activity, if not a fixed number of time units, may be expressed in a range with a stated minimum and a stated maximum, with or without a stated intermediate, such as their mean duration, a defined "most likely" duration, etc. As is well known in the scheduling art, the "early start" date of any given work activity is the earliest date by which all essential prior activities can be (or have been) completed, and the "early finish" date is obtained by adding the minimum duration of that activity to its early start date. The "late finish" date of a given work activity is the latest date by which that activity can be completed without delaying completion of the project, and the "late start" date is obtained by subtracting the minimum duration of that activity from its late finish date. Software for handling these variants will come readily to mind for persons skilled in the pertinent art of computer programming. Accordingly, programs do not constitute part of the invention claimed here, whereas selecting for . display and displaying timely structural features (with or without related data) are subject steps of this invention. It is also apparent that a report generator (program) may be devised so as to enable a human operator to obtain one or more of a wide variety of transient displays or permanent printouts at the touch of a key or (with voice-recognition equipment) just by an oral request. Thus, computer programs or software devised or adapted especially for effecting the present objectives may be particularly useful—and may be patentable (or not). Industrial Applicability. This invention is inherently advantageous for project management in the construction of bridges, buildings, dams, industrial plants, means of transport, and the like—and at all levels. Prominent among its benefits" are increased facility in project scheduling and control, decrease in required personnel and communications, and reduced costs all around. As noted in the foregoing description of Fig. 3, many persons involved in construction projects can improve their work ^ product accordingly. Of course, with the time and cost data obtained they also can compute dispersions, variances, and other statistical and accounting measures, or the like for use in accounting and other financial analysis. The invention benefits not only the construction firms that undertake to practice it but also those whose projects are constructed by means of it. The suppliers of hardware and software used in doing so also benefit. More advantages may become evident to readers of this specification. Some modifications in this invention have been suggested, as noted above. Others may be made, as by adding, deleting, combining, or subdividing parts or steps, while retaining some of the advantages and benefits of the invention, which itself is defined in the following claims.

Claims: THE CLAIMED INVENTION: 1. Structural graphics representation procedure for construction projects, wherein sequentialized discrete work activities of given durations are effective, when performed, to construct resulting discrete increments of structure, the procedure being characterized by the steps of preparing a time schedule from the start to the finish of a given project, including start and finish times of the respective work activities and structural increments, selecting a given time within the schedule and grouping the respective work activities, together with their resulting structural increments, according to given degrees of urgency thereof as of the selected time, and depicting the structure including representing the respective groups of structural increments with gradation in visual emphasis according to their degrees of urgency as of the selected time. 2. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 1 , characterized further by depicting the structure in polychrome, and evidencing the visual emphasis as boldness of shading thereof manifested in hue and brightness of color. 3. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 1 , characterized further by depicting the structure in monochrome, and evidencing the visual emphasis as boldness of shading thereof manifested in continuity and thickness of line. 4. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 1 , characterized further by grouping the work activities according to whether their respective scheduled finish times precede, coincide with, or succeed the selected time, and evidencing the visual emphasis as boldness of shading in the depiction of the structural increments. OMPI 5. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 4, characterized further by representing structural increments of the preceding work activities, having no remaining urgency as of the selected time, with the least bold shading; representing structural increments of the coincident work activities, having the greatest urgency as of the selected time, with the boldest shading; and representing structural increments of the other work activities, having intermediate urgency as of the selected time, with intermediately bold shading. 6. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 1, characterized further in that the selected time is a time during the actual construction of the project, and including comparing actual work activities and resulting structural increments against scheduled work activities and structural increments, noting any discrepancies therebetween, selecting a basis for degrees of urgency in accordance therewith, and imparting corresponding gradation in visual emphasis to representation of the various structural increments. 7. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 6, characterized further in that the selected basis for urgency is degree of completion, and including, comparing the respective work activities as to whether, if not completed, they are on schedule, ahead of schedule, or behind schedule; and representing corresponding structural increments least boldly if ahead of schedule, most boldly if behind schedule, and intermediately boldly if on schedule. 8. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 6, characterized further in that .the selected basis for urgency is completion within budgeted cost, and including comparing the respective work activities according to whether, if completed, their actual costs were as budgeted, under budget, or over budget; and representing corresponding structural increments least boldly if under budget, most boldly if over budget, and intermediately if as budgeted. 9. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 8, characterized further by comparing actual costs against the budgeted costs of materials and of work crews, respectively. 10. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 1 , characterized further by depicting the structural increments on a photographic, plotting, printing, or projection medium. 11. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 1 , characterized further by depicting the structural increments on a video screen capable of displaying images successively. 12. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 11, characterized further in that at least one included work activity effects removal, as distinct from construction, of a given item of structure, and including depicting such item of structure intermittently to indicate that the urgency is for removal rather than for construction. 13. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 11, characterized further in that the time schedule includes both early and late start and finish times of the respective work activities, thus defining slack time for any activity with non-identical early and late times and thereby endowing such activity with a lesser degree of urgency corresponding to its early times and with a greater degree of urgency corresponding to its late times, and including depicting the resulting structural increment alternately with less bold and more bold shading as visual emphasis of both urgencies. 14. Structural graphics procedure according to Claim 11 , characterized further in that the time schedule includes both early and late start and finish times of the respective work activities, thus defining slack time for any activity with non-identical early and late times, and including depicting the resulting structural increments with boldness of shading according to the existence and amount of slack. 15. As a product of the structural graphics procedure of Claim 10, a non-transient depiction of structure of a construction project on photographic, plotted, or printed medium, with gradation in visual emphasis evidenced as boldness in shading of the structural increments. 16. As a product of the structural graphics procedure of Claim 11, a transient depiction of structure of a construction project on a video screen, with gradation in visual emphasis evidenced as boldness in shading of the structural increments. 17. Depiction of structure of a construction project, whose sequentialized discrete work activities are effective to construct corresponding discrete increments of structure, the depiction being made as of a selected time within the schedule of the project and being characterized by gradation in visual emphasis of the structural increments grouped according to assigned degrees of urgency, such visual emphasis being evidenced as boldness in shading of structure. 18. Structural depiction according to Claim 17, characterized further in that structural increments of work activities wholly preceding the selected time, having no remaining urgency as of the selected time, are represented with the least bold shading; structural increments of work activities with finish times coinciding with the selected time, having the greatest urgency, are represented with the boldest shading; and structural increments of work activities having later finish times, having intermediate urgency, are represented with shading of intermediate boldness. OMPI 19. Structural depiction according to Claim 17, characterized further by being in polychrome, with boldness of shading thereof manifested in hue and brightness of color. 20. Structural depiction according to Claim 17, characterized further by being in monochrome, with boldness of shading thereof manifested in continuity and thickness of line. 21. Structural depiction according to Claim 17, characterized further by being displayed non-transiently on a photographic, plotting, printing, or projection medium. 22. Structural depiction according to Claim 17, characterized further by being displayed transiently on a video screen. 23. Structural depiction according to Claim 22, characterized further by alternating in part between bolder and less bold shading of at least one structural increment, signifying two dissimilar urgencies affecting it. 24. Structural depiction according to Claim 17, characterized further by alternating in part between display and non-display of at least one structural increment, signifying that it is transitory. 25. Use of a structural depiction defined according to Claim 17, where the urgency is one of lateness in actual versus scheduled construction, characterized by displaying such depiction to project personnel to emphasize the cause of the lateness so as to get the project back on schedule. 26. Use of a structural depiction defined according to Claim 17, where the urgency is one of exceeding the construction budget, characterized by displaying such depiction to project personnel to emphasize the cause of the budget overrun so as to get the project back on budget. 27. Use of a structural depiction of at least part of a construction project, wherein increments of structure are depicted with gradation in visual emphasis corresponding to degrees of urgency affecting different groups thereof, such use being characterized by displaying such depiction to the construction project personnel to inform them about urgencies of their construction project. 28. Use of a structural depiction defined according to Claim 27, where the urgency is one of lateness in actual versus scheduled construction, characterized by displaying such depiction to project personnel to emphasize the cause of the lateness so as to get the project back on schedule. 29. Use of a structural depiction defined according to Claim 27, where the urgency is one of exceeding the construction budget, characterized by displaying such depiction to project personnel to emphasize the cause of the budget overrun so as to get the project back on budget. 30. Use of a plurality of structural depictions defined according to Claim 27 as of successive times within the project schedule, such use being characterized by compiling the successive structural depictions into an historical record of the urgencies of the project.

Inventors: OCKMAN STUART, OCKMAN, STUART
Applicants: AFFILIATED INNOVAT MANAG INC, AFFILIATED INNOVATION MANAGEMENT INC.
Application year: 1984
Main classification: G06F15
IPC codes: G06Q10