SOIL FUNGICIDE

Abstract: Disclosed is a soil fungicide containing as the active ingredient a nitro alcohol derivative represented by the general formula: wherein R₁ represents X represents hydrogen atom, a lower alkyl group having 1 - 4 carbon atoms or a halogen atom; and R₂ represents a hydrogen atom or a lower alkyl group having 1 - 4 carbon atoms.

Description: Soil fungicide The present invention relates to a fungicide for plants, particularly to an excellent soil fungicide having especially remarkable anti-fungous activity for the various types of pathogenic microorganisms that cause soil-borne diseases. Soil-borne diseases and the prevention and disinfection thereof have received considerable attention recently among those engaged in agriculture, in order to soive cultivation problems as shown below: (1) The successive cultivation of the same crop on the same ground results in specific soil diseases in the soil and makes it difficult to prevent the diseases and disinfect the soil. (2) Because of an insufficient supply of compost and poor crop rotation, the physical, chemical and biological balance of the soil has been destroyed causing an increase in the infection potential of harmful microorganisms in the soil. (3) Microorganisms themselves have developed resistance against the preventive agents, which makes the prevention and disinfection more dif ficult. (4) From the pharmaceutical viewpoint, the toxicity of soil-antiseptics and fungicides, such as chloropicrin, pentachloronitrobenzene, etc., that have conventionally been used, and the impurities mixed therein, such as hexachloro cyclopentadiene (HCP) mixed in pentachloro nitro benzene,have caused serious problems; accordingly, there is a demand for chemicals which are safer and easier to handle. (Chloropicrin is strongly lachrymatory and is inconvenient to handle.) (5) There is a demand for chemicals which require a shorter time for soil disinfection and which allow planting and sowing within a short time after disinfection, without subjecting the crops to any phytotoxicity. Conventional soil antiseptics require more than a week for the disinfection, and after the disinfection of the soil, the ground has to be left for another seven to ten days in order to prevent the crops from phytotoxicity, by thoroughly releasing any gas remaining in the soil and, further still by thoroughly turning over the soil for aeration. Against this background as mentioned above, there is a call throughout the world for ideal soil fungicides. As the result of our enthusiastic efforts in studying and exploring an ideal soil fungicide free of such defects as those of the conventional soil fungicides, it was found - that a novel nitro alcohol derivative represented by the general formula: EMI3.1 wherein R1 represents CH3 #-CH-, #-C- CH3 CH3 EMI3.2 EMI3.3 X represents a hydrogen atom1 a lower alkyl group having 1 - 4 carbon atoms or a halogen atom; R2 represents a hydrogen atom or a lower alkyl group having 1 - 4 carbon atoms, is quite effective as the ingredient of a soil fungicide, and based thereon the present invention was accomplished. The usefulness of the soil fungicide of the present invention may be summarized as follows: (1) It is effective for various types of diseases in soil. For damping-off, for example, there is no soil fungicide effective for both Pythium spp. and Rhizoctonia spp. Mepronil (3'-isopropoxy-2-methyl- benzanilide), for example, is effective on Rhizoctonia spp. but has no effect on Pythium spp. On the other hand, hydroxyisoxazol is effective on Pythium spp. but has little effect on Rhizoctonia spp. Pentachloronitrobenzene is effective on Rhizoctonia spp. but has little effect on Pythium spp. Thu* a satisfactory disinfection of damping-off cannot be exerted unless these chemicals are mixed together. Furthermore, there are still fewer chemicals effective for other serious soil diseases, such as Plasmodiophora brassicae, in the present circumstances, pentachloronitrobenzene and tetra chloroisophthaionitrile are somewhat effective however, not effective enough. Compared with these fungicides, it has been confirmed that the soil fungicide of the present invention is not only effective on the damping-off fungi, both Pythium spp. and Rhizoctonia spp., but also exert an excellent effect on Plasmodiophora brassicae, as shown in Examples 1 and 2 of the present application. (2) The soil fungicide of the present invention makes it possible to carry out the disinfection with in a short time and proceed with planting without delay. As is the case with such soil fungicide,as chloropicrin or Dazomet (3,5-Dimethyl tetrahydro-l, 3 ,5( 2H) -thiadiazine-2-thione), a rather long time period is required between the disinfection of the soil and the following planting for the safety of the crops. In the case of chloropicrin or Dazomet seven to ten days are required for disinfection after the treatment of the soil, and planting cannot be completed without incurring the risk of intoxicating the crops unless the soil has been left for seven to ten days prior to the planting. 'Particularly,when the treatment is carried out in early spring, or it is performed in such low-temperature areas as Europe, this time period must be extended further, sometimes to several months. This is a serious problem which causes a great deal of inconveniences in farming operations as well as in the utilization of land. If, however, the soil fungicide of the present invention is used, all the operations of disinfection treatment, planting and sowing can be completed within a short time, e.g. two to three days, as shown in Examples 1, 2, 3 and 4, which is a great contribution to farming operations. Furthermore, in the case of many soil fungicides, aerating operation to release the remaining active gaseous substances is required after completion of the disinfection treatment, and planting free of phytotoxicity is only possible after completion of the aeration. In the case of the soil fungicide of the present invention, on the other hand, no such aerating operation is required, as shown in Examples 2 and 4 and thus it provides a good deal of convenience and simpification in farming operations. (3) The soil fungicide of the present invention is highly safe for man and beast and has no lachrymatory and skin-irritant effects. The soil fungicides that are most widely used today, such as chloropicrin and methylbromide, are violent poisons; these substances have violently irritative fumes as well as skin-irritant and lachrymatory properties. Particularly, in suburban cultivation areas they are causing serious pollution problems. The soil fungicide of the present invention, since it is of low toxicity and has scarcely any such irritant fumes or skin irritant properties, is quite advantageous in farming work. The nitroalcohol derivatives to be used as the active ingredient of the soil fungicide of the present invention are compounds that can be prepared according to the following process, and are all novel compounds. That is to say, they can be formed by aldol-condensing nitromethane and aldehyde in the presence of alkali; or by brominating the corn- pound obtained by aldol condensation. In addition, said aldehyde to be used for the preparation of these compounds can be synthesized by general synthesizing methods, or the method of Hans K. Dietl et al., i.e. the method disclosed iri Tetrahedron Letters, (15), 1273-1275, (1973). The reactions involved in the production of the compounds of the present invention proceed according to the following reaction formula: 1. Production of nitro alcohol compounds. EMI8.1 2. Production of brominated nitro alcohol compounds. (1) Bromination of EMI8.2 EMI8.3 (2) Reaction of R1CHO and CH3N02 EMI8.4 Hereinafter, certain examples for producing the compounds of the present invention will be described. Preparation Example 1 2,2-dimethyl-3-phenylpropion aldehyde Into a three-necked flask were put 140ml of water1 140 g of sodium hydroxide, 200 ml of benzene, and 14.7 g of tetrabutyl ammonium iodide, and these were then heated and agitated at 70 C. Subsequently, a mixture consisting of 380 g of benzyl chloride, and 288 g of isobutyl aldehyde was dripped thereinto over a 5-hour period. Heating and agitation at 70 C was proceeded for further 2 hours, then.: the benzene layer was separated. After rinsing with water, it was dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. After the solvent was distilled off, it was subjected to distillation under reduced pressure. The obtained amount was 364 g (yield 7594), which had a boiling point of 950C (7.2 mm Hg). Preparation Example 2 l-nitro-3,3-dimethyl-4-phenyl-2-butanol (Compound No. 6) One hundred grams of 2,2-dimethyl-3-phenyl propion aldehyde, obtained in Preparation Example 1, and 37 g of nitromethane were dissolved in 500 ml of methanol. The solution was then cooled, and 61 ml of lON aqueous sodium hydroxide solution was introduced thereinto under agitation; the'reaction mixture was then agitated for 30 minutes, and neutralized with an excess amount of 20 hydroxyl amine hydrochloride aqueous solution. The solution was extracted with ether, and after washing with aqueaus sodium hydrogensulfite solution and water, it was dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was distilled off, thereby obtaining the objective product. The amount obtained was 137.5 g (yield 98%). Preparation Example 3 l-bromo-l-nitro-3,3-dimethyl-4-phenyl-2-butanol (Compound No. 7) 22.3 g of the 1-nitro-3 ,3-dimethyl-4-phenyl- 2-butanol, obtained in Preparation Example 2, were added to 100 ml of methanol containing 2.3 g of sodium, while being cooled and agitated. After agitation for 30 minutes, 20 ml of carbon tetrachlor- ride containing 16 g of bromine were introduced thereinto so as to maintain the temperature at O C. After 1 hour agitation, methanol was distilled off under reduced pressure. One hundred milliliters of ether were added to the reaction mixture, and after washing it three times with water, the mixture was dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was distilled off to obtain the object product. The amount obtained was 29.8 g (yield 98,6). Preparation Example 4 2,2-dimethyl-4-pentene-1-al Synthesis was carried out in the same manner as Preparation Example 1, except that 76.5 g of allyl chloride and 96 g of isobutyl aldehyde were used as the starting material and a reaction temperature of 600C was employed. The amount of the product obtained was 67.2 g (yield 60%). Preparation Example 5 l-bromo-l-nitro-3,3-dimethyl-5-hexene-2-ol (Compound No. 13) l-nitro-3,3-dimethyl-5-hexene-2-ol was synthesized in the same manner as Preparation Example 2 by using 11.2 g of aldehyde formed in Preparation Example 4, 6.1 g of nitromethane and 10 ml of lON sodium hydroxide aqueous solution as the starting material (amount obtained was 16.3 g (yield 94.7%)). Ten grams of the synthesized material was dissolved in methanol containing 1.34 g of sodium, and the object product was synthesized in the same manner as Preparation Example 3, by using 9.4 g of bromine. The amount obtained was 13.8 g (yield 94.5%). The following table 1 shows the physical properties of the active ingredient compound of the present invention. Table 1 EMI12.1 EMI12.2 <tb> Com- <SEP> -1 <tb> pound <SEP> R, <SEP> 1 <tb> No. <tb> <SEP> 1 <SEP> ffC01H <SEP> H <SEP> H <SEP> 1600 <SEP> 1555 <SEP> 3460 <tb> <SEP> CH3 <tb> <SEP> 2 <SEP> n <SEP> H <SEP> Br <SEP> 1600 <SEP> 1565 <SEP> 3450 <tb> <SEP> 3 <SEP> II <SEP> H <SEP> CH3 <SEP> 1600 <SEP> 1550 <SEP> 3450 <tb> <SEP> 3 <tb> <SEP> CH <tb> <SEP> 3 <tb> <SEP> 4 <SEP> C- <SEP> H <SEP> H <SEP> 1600 <SEP> 1560 <SEP> 3420 <tb> <SEP> CH3 <tb> <SEP> 5 <SEP> tt <SEP> H <SEP> Br <SEP> 1600 <SEP> 1565 <SEP> 3415 <tb> <SEP> CH3 <tb> <SEP> 6 <SEP> > <SEP> H2-C- <SEP> H <SEP> H <SEP> 3410 <SEP> 1600 <SEP> 1590 <tb> <SEP> CH3 <tb> <SEP> 7 <SEP> II <SEP> H <SEP> Br <SEP> 3405 <SEP> 1600 <SEP> 1585 <tb> <SEP> 8 <SEP> 11 <SEP> CH3 <SEP> Br <SEP> 3910 <SEP> 1600 <SEP> 1575 <tb> <SEP> 9 <SEP> > <SEP> CH2-CH- <SEP> H <SEP> H <SEP> 1600 <SEP> 1560 <SEP> 3420 <tb> <SEP> Br <tb> 10 <SEP> 1I <SEP> H <SEP> Br <SEP> 1600 <SEP> 1565 <SEP> 3415 <tb> 11 <SEP> H <SEP> CH=CH- <SEP> H <SEP> Br <SEP> 3390 <SEP> 1620 <SEP> 1555 <tb> 12 <SEP> mCH=C- <SEP> H <SEP> - <SEP> H <SEP> Br <SEP> 1600 <SEP> 3430 <SEP> 1560 <tb> <SEP> Br <tb> <SEP> CH <tb> <SEP> '3 <tb> 13 <SEP> CH2=CH-CH <SEP> -C- <SEP> H <SEP> Br <SEP> 1640 <SEP> 3420 <SEP> 1555 <tb> <SEP> CH3 <tb> The soil fungicides of the present invention may be used by mixing the active ingredient as it is in the surface soil of the ground but it may also be used by dissolving or dispersing it in ;various solvents, such as acetone, xylene, etc., or in vegetable oils, paraffins, etc. Further, it is also possible to use them by mixing with such inorganic or organic carriers as diatom earth, urea, sawdust, etc. Still further, they may be used by adding thereto various types of adjuvants,such as various surfactants, or lubricants,such as white carbon, etc. Hereinafter certain-concrete examples of these preparations will be described. Example 1 Emulsion Twenty parts of the compound No. 7 weredissolved in 75 parts of xylene, and as the emulsifyer, 2 parts of polyoxyethylene alkyl allylether, 1 part of polyoxyethylene alkylether, and 2 parts of alkylbenzene sulfonate were mixed therewith and dissolved, thereby obtaining an emulsion. Said emulsion is applied to the soil, after being diluted with water. Example 2 Granules Three parts of the compound No. 2 and 5 parts diatom earth were thoroughly mixed and pulverized. To this mixture, 56 parts of clay, 30 parts of bentonite, 3 parts of sodium ligninsulfonate and 1 part of alkylbenzene sodium sulfonate were added and the materials were thoroughly mixed, then after adding water thereto, the mixture was granulated by an extrusiongranulator, dried1 and then subjected to particleregulation; a granular preparation was thereby obtained. The preparation is applied directly to the soil. Example 3 Oil preparation Fifteen parts of the compound No. 13 were dissolved in 85 parts of kerosine to form an oil preparation. The preparation is directly applied to the soil. The active ingredient compounds of the compo sition of the present invention may be used, if necessary,by blending with such fungicides as pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB), bis(dimethylthiocarbamoyl)di-. sulfide, tetrachloroisophthalonitrile, 3-hydroxy-5methylisoxazol, 5-ethoxy-3-trichloromethyl-1,2,4thiadiazol, N-(trichloromethylthio)-4-cyclohexene-1, 2-dicarboxyimide, N-(1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethylthio)- 4-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboxyimide, chloropicrin, etc. such soil fungicides as 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,3-dichloropropane, 1;2-dchloropropane, bis(2-chloro-l- methylethyl)-ether, bromomethane, ammonium(sodium)N methyldithiocarbamate, etc., nematocides, organo phosphorus type insecticides, carbamate type insecticides, chlorine type insecticides, or various types of herbicides, fertilizers, etc. or they may be used in mixture with these substances. Hereinafter the effects of the soil fungicides of the present invention will be described in Test Examples. Test Example 1 Disease in the Sample Soil: Gall-fungi of cruciferous green vegetables (Plasmodiophora brassicae) Sample Crop: Chinese cabbage Testing method: About 1.5 1 of disinfected soil, which was inoculated so as to provide a soil having a dormant spore density of 1 x 106 ml, was placed in plastic pots of diameter 14 cm, and these samples were treated with the designated amount of the chemicals. That is to say, each of the compounds to be used in the composition of the present invention were prepared as a 20% emulsion, by means of which irrigation treatment was given so as to provide 8 kg or 4 kg of the active ingredient per 10 areS. Said irrigation treatment was effected by dissolving the designated amount of emulsion in 2000 1 of water per 10 ares and thoroughly applying it to the surface of the soil. Three days after the treatment the soil was aerated and on the next day Chinese cabbage seeds were sown, 5 seeds per pot. Forty days after the chemical treatment the fresh weight of the above-ground parts of the plants was measured and the degree of gall-formation was evaluated. The evaluation of the gallformation degree was made according to the method des cribedby Williams, et al., in "Phytopathology" .56, 624 - 626 (1966). That is to say, observing with the naked eye, the gall-formation degree was classified into the following: O : Normal I : Slight formation of gall on lateral roots. II : Medium formation of gall on lateral or tap roots. III : Severe formation of gall on lateral or tap roots. The gall-formation degree was obtained by use of the above classification and according to the following formula: Gall-formation degree = (No. of plants) (No.of plants) (No.of plants) (of rating ) +(of rating ) + (of rating ) (I x 10 ) (Il x 80 ) ? (III x 100 ) Total No. of Plants observed The fresh weight of the above-ground parts of the plants is the average value of ten plants. Layout of the Plot: Each set was of 2 pots, in total 10 plants Test Result: The following Table 2 shows the gall-formation degree and the percentage of the fresh weight of the above-ground parts of the plants compared with noninoculated plants. The percentage of the fresh weight of the above-ground parts of the plants compared with non-inoculated plants is the numerical value indicated by percentage of the fresh weight of the aboveground parts in the treated sections compared with that of the non-inoculated and non-treated sections. Table 2 Composition of the Dosage Gall-forming Percent of present invention Phytotoxicity Compound a.i. kg/10 ares degree fresh weight Preparation No. 1 20% EC 8 2 98 4 2 102 2 " 8 0 125 4 4 117 3 " 8 0 100 4 3 96 4 " 8 2 102 4 8 103 5 " 8 0 121 4 0 133 6 " 8 1 98 4 7 101 7 " 8 1 107 4 4 97 8 " 8 2 115 4 7 107 9 " 8 0 106 4 1 104 10 " 8 0 112 4 0 104 - Table 2 (cont'd) Composition of the Dosage Gall-forming Percent of present invention Phytotoxicity Compound a.i. kg/10 ares degree fresh weight preparation No. 11 20% EC 8 0 114 4 0 93 12 " 8 0 89 4 0 105 13 " 8 5 111 4 12 90 Pentachloronitrobenzene 8 7 80 (PCNB) (Reference) 4 45 69 Non-treatment with - 100 25 fungal inoculation Non-treatment with - 0 100 fungal inoculation EC: Emulsifiable Concentrate Test Example 2 Disease in the Sample Soil: Damping-off fungus of cucumber seedlings (Pythium aphanidermatum) (Rhizoctonia solani) Sample Crop: Cucumber (variety: Sagami semi-white) Testing Method: About 300 ml of disinfected soil, which was inoculated with the damping-off fungi, was packed in porcelain pots of diameter 9 cm and treated with the respective chemicals. That is to say, the respective compounds to be used for the composition of the present invention were each prepared as a 20% emulsion, by means of which irrigation treatment was carried out so as to provide the proportion of the active ingredient of 5 kg or 1 kg per 10 ares. The irrigation treatment was performed by dissolving the designated amount of the emulsion in 3000 1 of water per 10 ares and applying it thoroughly to the surface of the soil. Three days after the treatment, cucumber seeds were sown, 10 seeds to a pot. Aeration was not made. Two weeks after sowing, the number of germination seeds, the number of damping-off plants and the number of brown-colored plants on the basal parts were recorded, and the infection percentage was obtained as follows: Infection = (No.of non- ) (No of ) (No.of brown- ) (germination) + (damping- ) + (colored plants on) (seeds . ) (off plants) (the basal parts) x100 Total seeds in sample Layout of the plot: Each set was of 2 pots1 in total 10 plants. Test Result: Table 3 shows the rate of infec tion (%). Table 3 Composition of the Present invention Dosage Infection rate % Phytotoxicity Compound Preparation a.i. kg/10 P.aphanidermatum R.solani No. 1 20% EC 5 0 0 1 0 0 2 " 5 0 0 1 0 0 3 " 5 0 0 1 0 0 4 " 5 0 0 1 0 0 5 " 5 0 0 1 0 0 6 " 5 0 0 1 0 0 7 " 5 0 0 1 0 0 8 " 5 0 0 1 0 0 9 " 5 0 0 1 0 0 10 " 5 0 0 1 0 0 - Table 3 (con'd) Composition of the Present invention Dosage Infection rate % Phytotoxicity Compound Preparation a.i. kg/10 P.aphanidermatum R.solani No. 11 20% EC 5 0 0 1 0 0 12 " 5 0 0 1 0 0 13 " 5 0 0 1 0 0 Captan 80% WP 2 25 5 (Reference) Nontreatment with - 100 85 fungal inoculation Nontreatment with - 0 0 no fungal inoculation WP: Wettable powder EC: Emulsifiable Concentrates Captan: N-(Trichloromethylthio)-4-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximide Test Example 3 The relstion between the time period from the treatment of soil until sowing and phytotoxicity was examined. Soil was packed in porcelain pots of diameter 9 cm, and irrigation treatment was performed so as to make the proportions of the respective chemicals 10 kg or 5 kg per are. The amount of water irrigated was in the proportion of 3000 1 per 10 ares. One, three, seven and fourteen days after the treatment, 10 seeds of Chinese cabbage were sown in each pot, 20 seeds in total for a set of two pots, and germinating rate was examined. The result is shown in Table 4. Said germinating rate was expressed as follows: No. of germinated seeds Germinating rate = - . . x 100 Total No. of seeds Table 4 Compound Dosage Days between treatment and sowing No. Preparation a.i.kg/10 areas 1 3 7 14 1 EC 10 10* 100 100 100 5 60 100 100 100 2 EC 10 5 100 100 100 5 35 100 100 100 3 EC 10 20 100 100 100 5 45 100 100 100 4 EC 10 15 100 100 100 5 20 100 100 100 6 EC 10 20 100 100 100 5 65 100 100 100 Dazomet 10 0 0 0 100 10% EC (Reference) 5 0 0 100 Chloro- 10 0 0 35 100 oil picrin 5 0 0 60 100 * Figures show germination percentage. EC: Emulsifiable Concentrate Test Example 4 After the disinfection treatment of the soil, the influence on the effectiveness with or without soil sealing was examined. Soil inoculated with damping-off fungi (Pythium aphanidermatum) of cucumber was packed in 1/2000 Wagner pots, which were then subjected to irrigation treatment with a designated amount of the water-diluted solution of the active ingredient compound of the composition of the present invention, then the soil was thoroughly agitated. For comparison, chloropicrin was injected at a depth of 15 cm at the center of a pot. For each treatment, the pots were divided into a sealing plot and a nonsealing plot, and in the sealing plot, te-upper surface of each pot was mulched completely with a thick vinyl sheet to prevent dispersal of gases. Ten days after the treatment, the sealing was removed; and two days after1 the cucumber seeds (variety: Sagami semiwhite) were sown 20 seeds to a pot; fourteen days after the sowing1 the number of germinated seeds and that of damping-off were recorded. The follawing Table 5 shows the germinating rate, rate of dampingoff, and that of heaLthy plants. Said germinating rate, rate of damping-off, and that of healthy plants were numerical values obtained by the following formulae, respectively: No. of germinated seeds Germinating rate = x 100 Total no. of seeds No. of infected plants Rate of dampingg-off = x 100 Total no. of seeds No.of healthy plants(in fected plants excluded) Rate of healthy plants = x-1 Total no. of seeds Table 5 Rate of Rate of Compound Prepa- With or without Dosage Germination damping-off healthy No. ration mulching a.i. kg/10 ares rate infection plants With 5 100 0 100 1 95 0 95 1 WP Without 5 100 0 100 1 100 0 100 With 5 100 0 100 1 100 0 100 4 WP Without 5 100 0 100 1 100 0 100 With 5 95 0 95 1 100 0 100 6 WP Without 5 75 10 65 1 10 10 0 With - 0 0 0 Untreated Without - 5 5 0 WP: Wettable Powder

Claims: Claims: 1. Nitroalcohol derivatives represented by the general formula: EMI29.1 wherein R1 represents EMI29.2 EMI29.3 EMI29.4 X represents a hydrogen atom1 a lower alkyl group having 1 - 4 carbon atoms or a halogen atom; R2 represents a hydrogen atom or a lower alkyl group having 1 - 4 carbon atoms. 2. The compound according to Claim 1, which is l-nitro-3,3-dimethyl-4-phenyl-2-butanol. 3. The compound according to Claim 1, which is 1-bromo-1-nitro-3,3-dimethyl-4-phenyl-2-butanol. 4. The compound according to Claim 1, which is l-bromo-l-nitro-3 , 3-dimethyl-5-hexene-2-ol. 5. A soil fungicide characterized in that it con tains as its active ingredient a nitroalcohol derivtive represented by the general formula: EMI30.1 wherein R1 represents EMI30.2 EMI30.3 EMI30.4 X represents a hydrogen atom, a lower alkyl group having 1 - 4 carbon atoms or a halogen atom; R2 represents a hydrogen atom or a lower alkyl group having 1 - 4 carbon atoms. 6. The soil fungicide according to Claim 5, which contains 1-nitro-3,3-dimethyl-4-phenyl-2-butanol as its active ingredient. 7. The soil fungicide according to Claim 5, which contains l-bromo-1-nitro-3 ,3-dimethyl-4-phenyl-2 butanol as its active ingredient. 8. The soil fungicide according to Claim 5, which contains 1-bromo-l-nitro-3, 3-dimethyl-5-hexene-2-ol as its active ingredient.

Inventors: TOYODA, SHIGEAKI, WATANABE, SYUNNOSUKE
Applicants: AGRO-KANESHO CO., LTD.
Application year: 1984
Main classification: C07C79
IPC codes: A01N33, A01N35, C07C205, C07C45