HYDROMETALLURGICAL ARSENOPYRITE PROCESS

Abstract: A process for the hydrometallurgical recovery of gold from arsenical pyrite concentrate. The process comprises decomposing the concentrate by using a leach composed of higher valence nitrogen oxides present in acidic solution; subjecting the decomposed product to a solid-liquid separa­ tion to produce a residue and a liquid fraction; recovering gold from the residue by conventional means; and precipi­ tating dissolved arsenic, iron and sulphur from the liquid fraction before recycling the liquid fraction in the process.

Description: HYDROMETALLURGI CAL ARSENOPYRITE PROCESS FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention is directed to a novel environmentally amicable hydrometallurgical process for the recovery of gold from arsenical pyrite concentrate. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The mineral arsenopyrite is known to contain gold which is in solution in the mineral matrix or is present as fine inclusions. This gold is not available for extraction by hydrometallurgical processes which treat only the mineral surfaces, for example, cyanidation. The mineral pyrite is often associated with arsenopyrite and may contain in its matrix finely dispersed gold which is difficult to extract. Arsenopyrite and pyrite are the main constituents of arsenical pyrite concentrates. The conventional means of liberating gold from arsenical pyrite concentrates is to roast the material and then treat the calcine by cyanidation. This process generates environmental pollution problems- due to the airborne emission of sulphur and arsenic oxides. The tailings from the calcine cyanidation contain arsenic which is also a potential environmental contaminant. Arsenical pyrite concentrates may also be treated for gold recovery through conventional pyrometallurgical processes which include copper smelting, lead smelting and zinc roasting. These processes also produce potentially harmful airborne arsenic emissions from the treatment of these concentrates. Problems associated with the added arsenic burden in the process flows also arise. Two hydrometallurgical processes exist which could potentially be used to decompose arsenical pyrite concentrates though they are not specifically used for this purpose. These are the Sill and the Calera processes which are both used for the treatment of cobalt and arsenic-bearing materials. In the Sill process, the concentrate is solubilized by the action of a caustic substance and oxygen under elevated temperatures and pressures. In the Calera process sulphuric acid and oxygen at high temperature and pressure are the active agents. Neither process, as far as is known, is commercially operated at the present time. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The subject invention is directed to an environmentally amicable hydrometallurgical process for decomposing arsenical pyrite concentrates in acidic solution through the action of higher valence nitrogen oxides. The decomposed product can be subjected to a solid-liquid separation to produce a residue and a liquid fraction. The solid residue produced can be readily treated for the recovery of gold by conventional techniques. The active nitrogen oxides can be regenerated by an oxidizing agent. Arsenic, iron and sulphur are precipitated from the solution making it suitable for reuse in the decomposition step. Arsenopyrite and pyrite are decomposed in acid solutions where the pH is less than 2 by the action of nitrogen oxides where the nitrogen has a valence of 3 or greater. These oxides include nitric acid, nitrous acid and nitrogen dioxide. The nitrogen oxide is present in sufficient quantity in the solution to provide an adequate rate of dissolution. The main products from the decomposition are soluble ferric iron species, soluble arsenate species, soluble sulphate species, elemental sulphur and nitric oxide, as well as nitrogen dioxide. Nitrogen dioxide becomes increasingly abundant as a product in the gas phase as the nitric acid concentration increases: seeCanadian Patent No. 995,468, Paul B. Queneau et al., August 24, 1976. The minor products are arsenic trioxide and nitrous acid. The gold contained in the concentrate remains in the solid residue which is composed of elemental sulphur and insoluble gangue minerals. Any silver present in the concentrate would also report to the residue. DRAWING Figure 1 illustrate arsenic concentration as a function of time for three similar experiments with solution composition as a variable. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The decomposition of arsenopyrite and pyrite by nitric acid occurs according to the following reactions. Fe AsS + 23/3 HNO3 = Fe(N03)3 + H3 AsO4 (1) + H2S 4 + 4/3 H2O + 14/3 NO FeAsS + 17/3 HNO3 = Fe(NO3)3 + H3As04 (2) + SO + 4/3 H2O + 8/3 NO FeS2 + 8 HNO3 = Fe(NO3)3 + 2H2S04 (3) + 2H2O + 5NO FeS2 + 5 HNO3 = Fe(N03)3 + 2SO + 2H20 + NO (4) In the reaction with arsenopyrite, it has been found that 60-90% of the mineral's sulphur is converted to soluble sulphate species. In the reaction with pyrite, the degree of conversion is 80-100%. The gold in the decomposition residue may be readily extracted by conventional techniques such as cyanidation, following leaching of the residue with sodium hydroxide to dissolve sulfur prior to cyanidation, or treatment with oxidizing chloride lixiviants, such as aqua regia. Silver may also be extracted by these techniques. It is important that the decomposition solution does not contain significant quantities of species which complex gold, for example; chloride ions. These would put the gold into solution and a separate additional process step would have to be included to extract it. The active nitrogen oxides are required only to decompose the minerals in the concentrate. The nitrogen oxide should be present in sufficient concentration in the solution to provide an adequate rate of dissolution. Any suitable acid may be used to form the soluble ferric iron species. An adequate rate of dissolution is about 10 to 30 minutes. In the reaction detailed below, nitrogen dioxide is the decomposition agent for arsenopyrite with sulphuric acid present. FeAsS + 4N02 = 1/2 Fe2 (S04)3 + H3 As04 (5) + 3/2 H2S04 + SO + 4N0 In the reaction detailed below, the sulphuric acid is formed from the decomposition of pyrite. FeS2 + 15/2 NO2 = 1/2 Fe2 (804)3 (6) + 1/2 H20 + 1/2 H2S04 + 15/2 NO In the preceding reactions, the active nitrogen oxides are reduced to nitric oxide which may then be regenerated by an oxidant . A useful oxidant is oxygen which reacts with nitric oxide in the presence of water to form nitrogen dioxide, nitrous acid and nitric acid as shown in the reactions set forth below. NO + 1/2 2 = NO2 (7) NO + NO2 + H20 = 2HN02 (8) 3HNO2 = HNO3 + H2O + 2NO (9) The regeneration of nitric oxide to the higher valence states may be done concurrently with the decomposition or as a separate operation. Nitrous oxide is formed by the decomposition of nitric oxide according to the side reaction shown below. 3NO = N2O + NO2 (10) When the regeneration step is carried out with oxygen concurrently with the decomposition reactions, the overall stoichiometry of arsenopyrite reacting with nitric acid and oxygen to produce sulphuric acid as the sulphur product is illustrated by the reaction below. FeAsS + 3.502 = Fe(NO3)3 + H3 As04 (11) + 3HNO3 + H2O + H2S 4 Since the active nitrogen oxides can be regenerated during the decomposition step, the quantity of these oxides present at any time may be quite small. The criterion is that there must be sufficient acid present in solution to form the soluble ferric iron species. It must be emphasized that it is the nitrogen oxides rather than oxygen that are the active decomposition agent. The presence of nitrogen'oxides with sulphuric acid differentiates the decomposition step described above from the Calera process. An important feature of decomposition using nitrogen oxides is the high speed of reaction. If a solution which is three molar in nitric acid is reacted with fine arsenical pyrite flotation concentrate, it has been found that the reaction is complete within ten minutes. This is significantly faster than rates claimed by other processes at similar conditions. Figure 1 shows the arsenic concentration as a function of time for three similar experiments in which the only variable is the composition of the solution. The three compositions are 3 M acid as HN03; 2.5 M acid as H2SO4; 0.5 M acid as HNO3; and 3.0 M acid as H2S04. The other conditions are given on Figure 1. It is apparent from the data that the presence of nitric acid greatly speeds the rate of reaction. The decomposition and regeneration steps are both exothermic. When a solution which is three molar in nitric acid is reacted with fine arsenical pyrite concentrate at 158 solids without oxygen present for regeneration, the temperature increase of the slurry is 40"C. With oxygen present for regeneration, the temperature increase is 1300C. Since the rates of the decomposition and regeneration reactions increase with temperature the overall reactions appear to accelerate as they proceed. It is possible that controlled cooling may be required to prevent the melting of elemental sulphur and to prevent the precipitation of salts. The decomposition step proceeds at any temperature above ambient. However, on a practical basis, the reaction is carried out at temperatures of between 80 ad 12Q C. It is important that sufficient acid be present to form the soluble ferric iron species. Without this acid, compounds will precipitate from solution. If oxygen is used for I3ageneration, any oxygen pressure above ambient is adequate. Agitation increases the speed of the reactions and improves the quality of the final sulphur-bearing residue. The decomposition leach can be carried out over a wide range of solid-liquid ratios. Increasing the ratio of solids to liquids provides economic bene fits, but the upper limit of this ratio is reached when the solubility limit of dissolved species is reached. When the decomposition reactions are complete, a solid-liquid separation is carried out to produce a residue containing all the gold and a clarified solution which is recycled in the process. To enable the solution to be reused for the decomposition step, the soluble arsenic, iron and sulphur must be removed from solution. Arsenic in the pentavalent state as ferric arsenate is removed from solution with ferric iron. The following reaction shows the formation of ferric arsenate from ferric nitrate and arsenate. Fe(N03)3 + H3As04 = 3HNO3 + FeAsO4 (12) + x H20 xH2O Ferric arsenate is produced virtually quantitatively from an equimolar solution of ferric nitrate and arsenic acid at all temperatures above ambient. However, the rate of precipitation can be controlled by temperature. At room temperature, complete precipitation requires several months, at 1000C precipitation requires one to two hours; and at 2000C precipitation occurs in less than one hour. Ferric arsenate can be precipitated rapidly at low temperatures by the neutralization of the acid in the solution. At 250C the solubility of ferric arsenate between pH 3 and pH 7 is very low. The solids produced at low temperature tend to be co-lloidal and difficult to filter. The solids can contain ferric hydroxide which also tends to be colloidal. The presence of sulphate in solution raises the solubility of ferric arsenate. A solution which is 1 M in ferric nitrate and arsenic acid is stable at room temperature in the presence of 0.5 M H2SO4. At higher temperatures, the effect of sulphate is less pronounced. A calcium-bearing neutralizing agent, such as calcium oxide or calcium carbonate, can be used to neutralize excess acid in solution and to remove sulphate in order to improve ferric arsenate precipitation. A small portion of the extracted arsenic is present as arsenite and thus arsenic trioxide can precipitate when the filtered decomposition solution is cooled. If insufficient arsenate or ferric is present in solution to bring about complete precipitation of the appropriate species, then arsenate or ferric compounds may be added to the solution. Sulphate is removed from solution by the addition of calcium-bearing materials to form calcium sulphate. The reaction between calcium carbonate and sulphuric acid is as follows. Cacao3 + H2S04 = Cay04 + CO2 + H2O C13) There are two forms of calcium sulphate which may be formed. Gypsum (CaSO4 2H20) has a low solubility which is virtually unaffected by temperature. In a 1 M solution of ferric nitrate and arsenic acid, the solubility of CaSO4 ' 2H2O is approximately 0.1 M. Anhydrite (CaSO4) forms at- temperatures above 60"C (although the crossover point from gypsum may be as high as llO"C due to supersaturation). The solubility of anhydrite drops rapidly with temperature. Solubility data for anhydrite in water gives a solubility of 0.02 M at 600C and .0015 M at 16O0C. Ferric iron is removed from solution by the formation of insoluble iron compounds. When a ferric iron solution is slowly neutralized at low temperatures, ferric hydroxide (Fe(OH)3) is formed. This material may be undesirable as it is colloidal and very difficult to filter. As the temperature is raised to 1000C, the precipitate is transformed to goethite, a more crystalline ferric iron compound; and as the temperature is raised further to 1300C, hematite (Fe203) is produced. The exact nature of the precipitate is dependent on neutralization history and the duration at temperature. Higher acid concentrations are permitted for a given iron rejection as the temperature is raised. In the production of hematite, a residual iron concentration of 5 g/l can be achieved in the presence of 60 g/l H2S04 at 1500C. At 2000C, the'same residual can be achieved in the presence of 90 g/1 H2S04 . With sulphate in solution, various basic sulphate salts are stable. In the range of temperature and solution compositions expected in the iron precipitation stage, hydronium jarosite ((H3O)Fe3(SO4)2(OH)6) and fibroferrite (Fe(OH)(SO4)) are expected to form. Hydronium jarosite is the most significant below 1500C. Fibroferrite is most significant above 1500C. Other forms of jarosite may be formed by the addition of alkali salts where the alkali metal or radical is NH4, Na, K, Ag or Pb. Jarosites are typically formed at 90 to 1500C at a pH of 1.0 to 1.5. The reaction below shows the formation of ammonium jarosite. 3/2 Fe2 (S04)3 = (NH4) Fe3 (so4)2 (OH)6 (14) + 6 H20 + NH3 + 5/2 H2S 4 The exact nature of ferric-sulphate compounds precipitated is difficult to specify as many different species are possible and the factors which govern their formation are complex. Various trace elements such as bismuth or tellurium may be present in the concentrate being treated. While some of these trace elements will report to the leach residue or waste precipitation residues, some may build up in solution and have to be bled-off. When trace elements are present in sufficient concentration, their recovery may be warranted. The operations described can be combined to create processes which will effectively decompose arsenical pyrite concentrates of varying compositions producing a residue which can be treated for gold recovery and a solution from which the soluble arsenic, iron and sulphur species can be removed. This solution can then be reused in the decomposition step. With a concentrate that is primarily arsenopyrite one possible process is a decomposition step with a recycled nitric acid solution using oxygen for regeneration, followed by a solids-liquid separation. The solids go to gold recovery, while calcium carbonate is added to the liquid and CO2 is evolved. The solution is then heated to a high temperature at which ferric arsenate and calcium sulphate co-precipitate. Another solids-liquid separation provides liquid for re-use in the decomposition, with.nitric acid and water being added to account for losses. Another possible process for a concentrate that is primarily arsenopyrite is a decomposition step with recycled nitric acid solution containing soluble calcium, using oxygen for regeneration. After leaching, the solution is cooled to precipitate calcium sulphate and a solid-liquid separation is made. The liquid is heated to precipitate ferric arsenate and another solid-liquid separation is made to give a solution to which calcium carbonate is added before reuse. With a concentrate that contains significant quantities of pyrite, one possible process is a decomposition step with a recycled solution, nitric oxide gas and oxygen being used for regeneration. This is followed by another decomposition step without oxygen to convert all the nitrogen oxides to nitric oxide, which is bled off. A solid-liquid separation produces a residue for gold treatment. Calcium carbonate is added to the liquid which is then heated to a high temperature to precipitate ferric arsenate, calcium sulphate and hematite. Another solids-liquid separation provides liquid for decomposition. Other processes within the scheme of the invention can be proposed from the steps described. Some processes are illustrated in the following examples. Example 1 A test was done to demonstrate the decomposition of an arsenical pyrite concentrate containing a large fraction of arsenopyrite (44.78 As, 31.7% Fe, 17.3% S, 7.34 oz/ton Au). This example demonstrates the basic decomposition step with a nitric acid solution. The following conditions and results were noted. HNO3 concentration 4N Temperature 80"C Pulp density 8% Arsenic extraction 100% Iron extraction 100% Sulphur extraction 68% The decomposition was rapid and complete. Example 2 A series of tests were run to demonstrate the decomposition of an arsenopyrite concentrate (as in Example 1) using a nitric acid solution and oxygen to regenerate the active nitrogen oxides. The conditions and results from a typical test in this series are shown below. HN03 concentration 3 N Temperature 80"C Oxygen Pressure 200 psig Pulp density 16% solids by weight Arsenic extraction 100t Iron extraction 96% Sulphur extraction 84% The use of oxygen permits the pulp density to be raised with respect to the nitric acid concentration. Example 3 In another test under conditions similar to those shown above, it was found that 998 of the gold in the concentrate reported to the decomposition residue. Example 4 The residue from another test conducted under conditions similar to those outlined in Examples 1 and 2 was treated with an aqua regia solution composed of 2 parts HCl, 1 part HNO3 and 3 parts H2O at 60 CC. The gold extraction was 98% based on the initial concentrate. Example 5 Another residue prepared along the lines of Examples 1 and 2 was treated with an alkaline cyanide solution. The gold extraction was 86% based on the initial concentrate. Cyanide use was heavy due to the formation of thiocyanate from the reaction of sulphur and cyanide. Example 6 A test was done to demonstrate t.le decomposition of an arsenical pyrite concentrate containing a large fraction of pyrite (4.9% As, 36.9% Fe, 36.28 S). A nitric acid solution was used with oxygen to regenerate the active nitrogen oxides. HN03 concentration 3 N Temperature 80"C Oxygen pressure 200 psig Pulp density 16% Arsenic extraction 99% Iron extraction 98% Sulphur extraction 95% The decomposition of this material was observed to be rapid and complete. Example 7 A test was conducted to demonstrate the decomposition of a pyrite-rich concentrate (as in Example 2) using a ferric nitrate and sulphuric acid solution. This example simulates a decomposition using the product solution from Example 6. Initial Fe(NO3)3 1 M Initial H2SO4 2.5 M Temperature SOOC Pulp density 6% Total pressure 0 psig As extraction 99% Fe extraction 1008 S extraction 99% Example 8 A test was performed to demonstrate the decomposition of an arsenopyrite concentrate (as in Example 1) using nitric oxide gas. Oxygen was added to regenerate the active nitrogen oxides. The nitric oxide gas was produced by the reaction of arsenopyrite with nitric acid as in Example 1. HN03 concentration 0 N Temperature 80"C Pulp density 8% As extraction 100% Fe extraction 100% S extraction 60% A pyrite-rich concentrate can be reacted in a similar manner. Example 9 A test was done to demonstrate the pre'cipita- tion of ferric arsenate by raising the solution temperature. No sulphate was present in the solution. Fe(NO3)3 concentration 1 M As concentration 1 M Temperature 200 C Fe removal 97% As removal 98% Similar results were obtained at 1500C. Example 10 A series of tests were conducted to demonstrate the effect of neutralization and sulphate removal on the precipitation of ferric arsenate. To remove sulphate, calcium carbonate was added to the solution and the evolved CO2 was released. As concentration 1 M 1 M Fe concentration 1 M 1 M S042- concentration 0.5 M 0.5 M CaCO3 added 0.5 M Temperature 200"C 200"C As removal 66% 98% Fe removal 72% 96% Soy2¯ removal 5% 59% Example 11 A series of tests were performed to demonstrate an entire process which would treat an arsenical pyrite concentrate containing a large fraction of arsenopyrite (as in Example 1). The decomposition step was the same as for Example 2 using a nitric acid solution and oxygen for regeneration. HN03 concentration 3 N Temperature 80"C Oxygen pressure 200 psig Pulp density 16% As extraction 96% Fe extraction 99% S extraction 82% After filtration, calcium carbonate was added to the solution, the CO2 evolved was released and the mixture was heated as in Example 10. The removal figures shown are relative to the starting solution. As concentration 0.9 M Fe2 concentration 0.9 M S042- concentration 0.7 M CaC03 added 0.7 M Temperature 2000C As removal 98% Fe removal 96% S removal 76% The solution was then used for a second decomposition step with arsenopyrite concentrate. The extraction figures are relative to the added concentrate. Temperature 80"C Oxygen pressure 220 psig Pulp density 16% As extraction 97% Fe extraction 97% S extraction 60% Example 12 A series of tests were done to demonstrate an entire process which would treat an arsenical pyrite concentrate containing a large fraction of arsenopyrite (as in Example 1). The decomposition step was carried out with a nitric acid and calcium nitrate solution. After decomposition, the slurry was cooled to reduce the solubility of calcium sulphate. Ca concentration 1 M HNO3 concentration 3N Decomposition temperature 80"C Oxygen pressure 200 psig Precipitation temperature 20 C Pulp density 16 As extraction 86% Fe extraction 100% S extraction 22% After filtration, the solution was heated to precipitate ferric arsenic. As concentration 0.8 M Fe concentration 0.9 M S042- concentration 0.1 M Temperature 200"C As removal > 81% Fe removal 81% S042- removal 34% After filtration, calcium carbonate was added to the solutio and the C02 evolved was released. The solution was then used in a second decomposition stage similar to the first. CaCO3 added 1.3 M Decomposition temperature 80 C Oxygen pressure 200 psig Precipitation temperature 20"C Pulp density 16% As extraction 94% Fe extraction 94% *S extraction -5% *In the second decomposition step, more sulphate was removed than was produced by the decomposition. Example 13 A series of tests were run to demonstrate an entire process which would treat an arsenical pyrite concentrate containing a large fraction of pyrite (as in Example 6). The decomposition step was as Example 6 using nitric acid solution and oxygen for regeneration. HN03 concentration 3 N Temperature 80"C Oxygen pressure 200 psig Pulp density 12% As extraction 100% Fe extraction 93% S extraction 97% A second decomposition step was conducted as in Example 7 using the filtrate from above. Oxygen was not used. Temperature 80 C Pulp density 12% Total pressure 0 psig As extraction 100% Fe extraction 908 S extraction 87% Calcium carbonate was added to the filtrate obtained from the previous step and CO2 was evolved. The solution was then heated to precipitate a mixture of ferric arsenate, basic iron compounds and calcium sulphate. CaCO3 added 1.2 M Temperature 200"C As removal 97% Fe removal 82% S042- removal 77% After filtration, the solution from the precipitation stage could be reused by the addition of nitrogen oxides, for example, the addition of nitric acid or the addition of nitric oxide and oxygen. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art in the light of the foregoing disclosure, many alterations and modifications are possible in the practice of this invention without departing from the spirit or scope thereof. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is to be construed in accordance with the substance defined by the following claims.

Claims: The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows: 1. A hydrometallurgical process for the recovery of gold from arsenical pyrite concentrate, comprising leach decomposing the concentrate by using a leach composed of higher valence nitrogen oxides present in acidic solution; subjecting the decomposed product to a solid-liquid separation to produce a residue and a liquid fraction; recovering gold from the residue by conventional means; and precipitating dissolved arsenic, iron and sulphur from the liquid fraction before recycling the liquid fraction in the process. 2. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein the valence of the nitrogen of the nitrogen oxide is 3 or greater. 3. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein the source of the nitrogen oxide is a substance selected from the group consisting of nitric acid, nitrous acid and-nitrogen dioxide. 4. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein the decomposition leach is conducted at a slurry temperature between 600C and 120"C. 5. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein the decomposition leach contains nitric acid. 6. A process as defined in Claim I wherein the decomposition leach is conducted at a pH of less than about 2. 7. A process as defined in Claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein the nitrogen oxide is present in sufficient concentration in the solution to provide an relatively rapid rate of dissolution. 8. A process as defined in Claim 4, 5 or 6 wherein the nitrogen oxide is present in sufficient concentration in the solution to provide an adequate rate of dissolution. 9. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein concurrently with the decomposition leach, regeneration of higher valence nitrogen oxides is conducted using oxygen. 10. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein thenitric oxide is reacted with oxygen external to the leach to provide the nitrogen oxides required for decomposition. 11. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein arsenic and iron are removed from the separated liquid fraction by elevating the temperature thereof to precipitate ferric arsenate. 12. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein iron is removed from the liquid fraction by the formation of insoluble iron compounds caused by the combined action of neutralization and temperature elevation of the fraction. 13. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein sulphate is removed from the liquid fraction by the addition of calcium bearing materials to form calcium sulphate. 14. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein gold is recovered from the solid residue by utilizing a cyanidation process. 15. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein gold is recovered from the solid residue by treating the residue with an oxidizing chloride lixiviant. 16. A process as defined in Claim 13 wherein the calcium bearing material is selected from the group consisting of calcium oxide and calcium carbonate. 17. A process as defined in Claim 11 or 12 wherein the temperature of the liquid fraction is elevated to a temperature between about 1000C and about 2000C. 18. A process as defined in Claim 1 wherein the nitrogen oxide is present in sufficient concentration in the solution that dissolution occurs in a time of less than about 30 minutes. 19. A process as defined in Claim 1, wherein the nitrogen oxide is present in sufficient concentration in the solution that dissolution occurs in a time of about 10 minutes. 20. A hydrometallurgical process for the recovery of gold from a primarily arsenical pyrite concentrate comprising: leach decomposing the concentrate by using a leach composed of recycled nitric acid solution which has been regenerated by the use of oxygen; subjecting the decomposed product to a solidliquid separation to produce a residue and a liquid fraction; recovering gold from the residue; adding calcium carbonate to the liquid fraction; and elevating the temperature of the liquid fraction thereby precipitating ferric arsenate and calcium sulphate from the liquid fraction before recycling and oxygen regenerating the liquid fraction in the process. 21. A hydrometallurgical process for the recovery of gold from a primarily arsenical pyrite concentrate comprising: leach decomposing the concentrate by using a leach composed of recycled nitric acid solution containing soluble calcium, whereby the solution has -been regenerated by the use of oxygen; cooling the solution to precipitate calcium sulphate; subjecting the resultant product to a solidliquid separation to produce a residue and a liquid fraction; recovering gold from thezresidue; elevating the temperature of the liquid fraction to precipitate ferric arsenate; subjecting the resultant liquid fraction to a solid-liquid separation to produce a residue and a liquid fraction; and adding calcium carbonate to the resulting liquid fraction before recycling and oxygen regenerating the liquid fraction in the process. 22. A hydrometallurgical process for the recovery of gold from an arsenical pyrite-pyrite concentrate comprising: leach decomposing the concentrate by using a leach composed of higher valence nitrogen oxides present in acidic solution, whereby nitric oxide gas and oxygen have been used for regeneration of the leach solution; subjecting the decomposed concentrate to a second leach decomposing step using a leach composed of higher valence nitrogen oxides present in acidic solution whereby the solution has been regenerated using nitric oxide gas in the absence of oxygen to thereby convert all the nitrogen oxides to nitric oxides; bleeding off the nitric oxides; subjecting the decomposed concentrate to a solid-liquid separation to produce a residue and a liquid fraction; recovering gold from the residue; adding calcium carbonate to the liquid fraction; and elevating the temperature of the liquid fraction to precipitate ferric arsenate, calcium sulphate and hematite from the liquid fraction before recycling and oxygen regenerating the liquid fraction in the process.

Inventors: BEATTIE, MORRIS JOHN VREUGDE, PETERS, ERNEST, RAUDSEPP, REIN
Applicants: BEATTIE, MORRIS JOHN VREUGDE, PETERS, ERNEST, RAUDSEPP, REIN
Application year: 1984
Main classification: C22B11
IPC codes: C22B11