MULTI-LAYER FLEXIBLE SHEET STRUCTURE FOR PACKAGING, A PACKAGE MADE THEREFROM, AND A METHOD OF MAKING THE SAID STRUCTURE

Abstract: A multiple layer sheet structure (10) suitable for making tubular squeeze containers, such as for dentifrice, incorpo­ rates a uniaxially oriented polypropylene layer (16) within 1.5 mils (0.038 mm) of a surface of the structure destined to be the exterior of the container. Preferably the polypropylene is coextruded with low density polyethylene (12), and an inter­ vening adhesive polymer (14) to form a three layer coex­ truded film substructure. The substructure is then uniaxially oriented at a stretch ratio of 3/1 to 4/1 and then laminated to the other layers (18 to 30) of the multiple layer structure, the low density polyethylene layer (12) forming one of the exterior surfaces of the sheet structure. Lap-seamed tubes are formed from the sheet structure with the uniaxially oriented layers (12 to 16) at the outer surface of the tube, and with the direction or orientation running along the length of the tube.

Description: "MULTI-LAYER FLEXIBLE SHEET STRUCTURE FOR PACKAGING, A PACKAGE MADE THEREFROM, AND A METHOD OF MAKING THE SAID STRUCTURE" This invention pertains to multiple layer flexible sheet structures for packaging and the use of such structures in flexible tubes of the type commonly used for packaging paste type products. The invention also concerns the method of making such structures. Thick metal foil as a single layer has long been used to hold and dispense paste type products. However, metal paste tubes have definite shortcomings. Compared to other tube structures, metal tubes are expensive, dent easily and tend to crack with a moderate amount of flexing. Of recent times, a large share of the tube market has been taken by flexible sheet materials having a multiplicity of polymeric layers. Typical tubes have an inner heat sealable layer, an outer heat sealable layer, and a barrier layer interposed therebetween. Additional layers may further be used in conventional structures to provide other properties or qualities. Layers of a non-polymeric nature, such as paper and thin metal foils, may also be included in these sheet materials to provide specialized performance functions. It is known, for example, to provide a layer of thin aluminum foil as a high quality barrier layer. When foil is used, it is common practice to use a highly adhesive polymer to adhere it to adjacent layers of the structure. While known structures have experienced success commercially, there has been a certain degree of failure with existing tube structures. Certain products are particularly hard to package because their chemical activities result in the inner tube layers and particularly the aluminum foil layer being attacked. This problem has been addressed by using chemically resistant polymers as the tube interior layers to protect the foil. The most recent developments in that regard are described in our copending unpublished European patent application Number 82306219.5, wherein the inner sealant layer of the tube is linear low density polyethylene copolymer - It is also known to include a layer of paper, which may provide dimensional stability, which is particularly important for printing, and which also provides an aesthetically pleasing and aseptically clean appearing white background. Paper also improves deadfold retention. A particular problem of tube failure is attributed to failure of the tubes due to rough handling during shipping. The tube sidewall may split, allowing the contents of the tube to ooze out. It has been observed that the paper layer is the weakest part of known laminates, and once it begins to fail, the entire tube is weakened and breaks. The ability of a tube to withstand rough handling is related to its ability to withstand a drop test described hereinafter as a tube drop test, in which a tube filled with product is repeatedly dropped until the tube fails. All tubes shipped in commerce may be expected to be subjected to rough handling, regardless of the product contained, and are thus subject to handling stress as exemplified in the tube drop test. Economic construction of tubes consistently capable of passing the drop test has remained a problem. This problem has been addressed by using a strengthening layer of biaxially oriented polypropylene within the sheet structure, as described in the said Application No. 82306219.5. As disclosed therein, the laminate contains a paper layer, and while certain improvements in strength are achieved, it is desirable to achieve dimensional stability in another structure which has the economy and stability of paper, and increased strength, to make an even more cost effective structure. Another improvement in combatting the chemical activity of the product on the container is described in our copending unpublished European patent application Number 83300445.0 which teaches the use of a polyacrylic acid chrome complex primer between the foil and an ethylene acrylic acid copolymer on the sealant side of the foil. It is an object of this invention to make a dimensionally stable sheet structure without paper for use in making tubes, which structure has desired product holding chemical resistance, at a more economical cost, and deadfold retention qualities. In its broadest aspect, the present invention provides a multiple-layer sheet structure for use in a heat sealed package, characterised in that the outer layers (destined to form the exterior of a package) are an outermost heat sealable layer, a polypropylene layer and an intervening adhesive layer, the polypropylene layer at least being uniaxially oriented at a stretch ratio of 3/1 to 4/1 and this layer being disposed within 1.5 mil (0.038 mm) of the exterior surface. Thus, according to the invention there is a multiple layer sheet structure having two exterior surface layers and a plurality of interior layers, characterised by comprising, in order: (a) a first heat sealable layer at a first one of said exterior surfaces; (b) a first adhesive layer of ethylene acrylic acid copolymer; (c) a metal foil layer; (d) a second adhesive layer of ethylene acrylic acid copolymer; (e) a first layer of polyethylene or an ethylene copolymer; (f) a second layer of polyethylene or an ethylene copolymer; (g) a primer layer; (h) a layer of uniaxially oriented polypropylene, the orientation ratio being from 3/1 to 4/1; (i) a third adhesive layer; and (j) a second heat sealable layer at the second one of said exterior surfaces, the layer of uniaxially oriented polypropylene being within .5 mils (0.038 mm) of the said second exterior surface. In preferred structures according to this invention, the second heat sealable layer, the third adhesive layer, and the polypropylene layer, are produced by coextrusion as a three layer film and are all uniaxially oriented simultaneously as a three layer film, the orientation ratio being between 3/1 and 4/1. In the finished sheet structure the three layer oriented coextruded film is 2.0 - 2.5 mils (0.051 to 0.064 mm) thick and the polypropylene layer is about 1.0 mil (0.025 mm) thick. In order that the preferred sheet material of the invention may be formed into tubular containers, it is essential that the first and second heat sealable layers be compatible for heat sealing to each other. The invention is also embodied in a flexible dispensing tube made of the multiple layer sheet material, hereinabove described, with the uniaxially oriented layer or layers disposed toward the exterior surface of the tube. The invention further comprehends a method of making a multiple layer sheet material. The steps of the method include, first coextruding a three layer film and uniaxially orienting it at an orientation ratio of 3/1 to 4/1 to produce an oriented film having three consecutive layers of 0.8 to 1.2 mils (0.02 to 0.03 mm) low density polyethylene, 0.2 to 0.3 mil (0.005 to 0.008 mm) ethylene methyl acrylate, and about 1.0 mil (0.025 mm) polypropylene. The oriented film is corona treated on the exposed polypropylene surface. The treated surface is then primed with polyethylene imine. A previously formed low density polyethylene film, having a thickness of 2.75 to 3.25 mils (0.07 to 0.08 mm) is then extrusion laminated to the treated and primed polypropylene layer, using about 1.0 mil (0.025 mm) of low density polyethylene as the extrusion laminant. The 2.75 to 3.25 mil (0.07 to 0.08 mm) low density polyethylene layer is then extrusion laminated to an aluminium foil layer using about 1.0 mil (0t025 mm) of ethylene acrylic acid copolymer as the extrusion laminant. Optionally, after this step the still exposed surface of the foil may be primed using a polyacrylic acid based primer. The foil is finally coextrusion coated with a coextrudate of ethylene acrylic acid copolymer and polyethylene or linear low density polyethylene, the ethylene acrylic acid copolymer being coated onto the foil. Embodiments of the invention will now be described in more detail, by way of non limitative example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: FIGURE 1 is a cross-section of a preferred embodiment of sheet structures according to the invention. FIGURE 2 is a cross-section of another embodiment of the invention, which is slightly modified from the embodiment shown in FIGURE 1, FIGURE 3 is a cross-section of still another embodiment of the invention, which combines the novel strengthening layers with more conventional sealant layer structure for disposition on the interior of the tube, and FIGURE A is a partially cut-away view of a tube made from sheet structure according to this invention Turning now to the drawings, the numeral 10 in FIGURE 1 designates the entire multiple layer sheet structure cross-section. Layers 12 and 20 are low density polyethylene (LDPE). Layer 22 is pigmented LDPE Layer 14 is ethylene methyl acrylate (EMA). Layer 16 is polypropylene (P), Layer 18 is polyethylene imine (PEI) primer. Layers 24 and 30 are ethylene acrylic acid copolymer (EAA). Layer 26 is aluminum foil. Layer 28 is a polyacrylic acid chrome complex primer; and layer 32 is linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE). With reference now to the particular combination of layers and their interactions with one another to form the dynamics of the invention, it is seen that layers 20 to 32 form a substructure which possesses features in common with our aforesaid unpublished European applications, although it will be seen that there is no paper in the present structure. In pointing to the novelty of the structure, attention is concentrated on layers 12, 14 and 16. In particular, layer 16 alone has two parameters significant to the present invention. The first significant parameter is that the PP is uniaxially oriented, with orientation ratio of 3/1 to 4/1. The second significant parameter is its location in the structure. We have found that unexpected advantage is achieved when the uniaxially oriented PP layer is within 1.5 mils (0.04 mm) and preferably within 1.0 mil (0.025 mm) of the surface of the sheet structure which will form the outside of the tube. In forming the sheet structure, it is economical and convenient to coextrude layers 12, 14 and 16 as a film substructure, and to uniaxially orient the three layer substructure, such that all of layers 12, 14 and 16 are uniaxially oriented. After orientation, the PP layer is then corona treated and primed with PEI primer (layer 18) before being extrusion laminated to the LDPE film of layer 20. In FIGURE 2 the overall structure is designated 110. The layers in FIGURE 2 are numbered in the 100 series of numbers corresponding to the two digit numbers of like layers serving the same or similar functions in FIGURE 1. Thus, both layers 12 and 112 are LDPE layers serving as an outside layer of their structures and are heat sealable. Similar comparisons apply to all layers in FIGURE 2, except layers 114 and 119. Layer 114 is an anhydride modified polypropylene adhesive substituted in place of the EMA of layer 14 in FIGURE 1. Layer 119 is ink used for printing artwork on the PP layer. In FIGURE 3 the overall structure is designated 210. The layers in FIGURE 3 are numbered in the 200 series of numbers corresponding to the two digit numbers of like layers serving the same or similar functions in FIGURE 1. Thus layers 212, 214, and 216 represent the uniaxially oriented three layer substructure, 218 is PET, 220 and 222 are LDPE. Layers 224 and 230 are EAA. Layer 226 is aluminum foil. Layer 232 is LDPE. Of the illustrated embodiments, FIGURE 3 represents most closely the currently commercial structures. It departs from currently commercial structures in (1) deletion of the paper layer, and (2) addition of the uniaxially oriented PP layer within 1.5 mils (0.04 mm) of the sheet surface. Layers 212 and 214 are, of course, conveniently also oriented. FIGURE 4 represents an external view of a tube such as is made from sheet structure of the invention. The overall tube is designated 34, with part of the tube cut away to show contents 37. Extending longitudinally of the tube is a double-headed arrow designated 38. The arrow 38 represents that the direction of orientation of the uniaxially oriented layers is along the direction of the arrow, namely along the longitudinal axis of the tube. In order to achieve the strength and deadfoldretention objectives of the invention, it is essential that the oriented PP layer be within 1.5 mils (0.04 mm) of the sheet surface. This puts certain limitations on layers 12 and 14. Since layer 12 is functionally a heat seal layer in forming the lap seal on the tube sidewall, it should desirably be as thick as possible, within the given limitations, in order consistently to form a good heat seal. Layer 14, then should be as thin as possible while still fulfilling its adhesive function of holding layers 12 and 16 together. In practice, layer 12 is between 0.8 and 1.2 mils (0.02 to 0.03 rm) thick and layer 14 is 0.2 to 0.3 mil (0.005 to 0.007 mm) thick. Layer 16 is desirably about 1 mil thick (0.025 rr. While PEI is shown as a layer 18, it will be appreciated that, in its use as a primer, it is a thin coating and is shown as a layer for illustrative purposes only. Likewise layer 28. Layer 22 is usually a bulky, pre-formed film of pigmented white LDPE, and is about 2.75 to 3.25 mils (0.07 to 0.08 mm) thick. Layer 20 LDPE is conventionaly used as an extrusion laminant to join layers 22 and 16, and is typically about 1.0 mil thick (0,025 mm). Layer 24 is conventionally used as an extrusion laminant to join layer 22 to the foil of layer 26. The foil is advantageously between 0.25 and 0.7 mil (0.006 to 0.012 mm) thick, depending on the anticipated product and its use. The foil may be extrusion coated directly with a relatively thick layer of 2.0 mils (0.05 mm) of EAA and 1.2 mils (0.03 mm) of LDPE as in FIGURE 3. Alternatively, as shown in FIGURES 1 and 2, the foil may first be primed with polyacrylic acid chrome complex primer, layers 28 and 128. With the foil thus primed, the primer provides a certain degree of resistance to chemical attack. In these structures, the expensive EAA may be reduced to the amount required for its adhesive function, namely 0.5 mil (0.013 mm). The outer sealant layer of LLDPE is 2.0 mils (0.051 mm). Tubes made with the sheet structures of this invention show an improved strength in surviving drop tests described hereinafter. Surprisingly, they also show increased retention of deadfold, also described hereinafter. EXAMPLE 1 LDPE, EMA, and PP are cast coextruded using three extruders feeding into a coextrusion die, and -formed into a three-layer coextruded film The coextruded film is uniaxially oriented at an orientation ratio of 3.2/1 to form an oriented three-layer substructure 2.0 mils (0.051 mm) thick, with the following thicknesses: 0.8 mil LDPE (0.02 mm) 0.2 mil EMA (o.005 mm) 1.0 mil PP (0.025 mm) The PP surface is corona treated and primed with PEI primer. The PP is then extrusion laminated to a previously formed 2.75 mil (0.07 mm) film of pigmented LDPE, using 1.0 mil (0.025 mm) LDPE as the extrusion laminant, to make a five layer substructureexcluding the primer. The 2.75 mil (0.07 mm) LDPE surface layer is then extrusion laminated to a 0.7 mil (0.018 mm) aluminum foil, using 1.0 mil (0.025 mm) EAA as the extrusion laminant. The opposite side of the foil is then primed with polyacrylic acid chrome complex primer and coextrusion coated with 0.5 mil (0.013 mm) EAA and 2.05 mils (0.053 mm) LLDPE, with the EAA against the foil, and the LLDPE layer forming the second outer surface of the completed sheet structure. The first outer surface is the LDPE in the uniaxially oriented three-layer substructure. EXAMPLE 2 Another sheet structure is made using the same processes and materials but with some different layer thicknesses, as follows. The three-layer oriented substructure is 2.5 mils (0.063 mm) thick, as follows: 1.2 mils LDPE (0.03 mm) 0.3 mil EMA (0.0076 mm) 1,0 mil PP (0.025 mm) The other differences are 0.25 mil (0.006 mm) foil and 2.0 mil (0.051 mm) LLDPE. EXAMPLE 3 Another sheet structure is made as in EXAMPLE 2 using the same processes and materials, except as follows. The three-layer oriented substructure is two mils thick, as follows: 0.8 mil LDPE (0.02 mm) 0.2 mil Admer (0.005 mm) 1.0 mil PP (0.025 mm) Admer (Registered Trade Mark) is an anhydride modified polypropylene-based adhesive polymer. After the PP layer is corona treated and primed, it is printed with ink before being extrusion laminated to the LDPE layer, which in this case is 3.25 mils (0.08 mm) thick instead of 2.75 mils (0.07 mm) as before. EXAMPLE 4 Yet another sheet structure is made as in EXAMPLE 3 using the same processes and materials, except as follows. In the three layer oriented substructure, 0.2 mil (0.005 mm) EMA is substituted for the Admer. The ink is omitted. The extrusion laminant LDPE layer corresponding to layer 220 in FIGURE 3 is 0.8 mil (0.02 mm). The polyacrylic acid chrome complex primer is omitted; and the final three layers are: 0.25 mil foil (0.006 mm) 2.0 mils EAA (0.05 mm) 1.2 mils LDPE (0.03 mm) Table 1 shows the complete structures of EXAMPLES 1-4 along with structures of comparative examples A, B and C which are not within the scope of this invention. Comparative example A is paperless, but does not contain a uniaxially oriented layer. Comparative example B contains a uniaxially oriented PP layer, but it is substantially farther than 1.5 mils (0.038 mm) from the surface of the sheet structure. Comparative example C is a conventional sheet structure used commercially to make toothpaste tubes. TABLE I EX. 1 EX. 2 0.8 mil LDPE* (0.02 mm) 1.2 mil LDPE* (0.030 mm) 0.2 mil EMA* (0.005 mm) 0.3 mil EMA* (0.008 mm) 1.0 mil PP* (0.025 mm) 1.0 mil PP* (0.025 mm) Primer Primer 1.0 mil LDPE (0.025 mm) 1.0 mil LDPE (0.025 mm) 2.75 mils white LDPE (0.07 mm) 2.75 mils white LDPE (0.07 mm) 1.O,mil EAA (1.025 mm) 1.0 mil EAA (0.025 mm) 0.7 mil foil (0.018 mm) 0.25 mil foil (0.006 mm) Primer Primer 0.5 mil EAA (0.013 mm) 0.5 mil EAA (0.013 mm) 2.05 mils LLDPE (0.064 mm) 2.0 mils LLDPE (0.051 mm) 10.0 mils Total (0.25 mm) 10.0 mils Total (0.25 mm) EX.3 EX. 4 0.8 mil LDPE* (0.02 mm) 0.8 mii LDPE* (0.02 mm) 0,2 mil Admer* (0.005 mm) 0.2 mil EMA* (0.005 mm) 1.0 mil PP* (0.025 mm) 1.0 mnl PP* (0.025 mm) Primer Primer Ink 0.8 mil LDPE (0.02 mm) 1.0 mil LDPE (0.025 mm) 3.25 mils white LDPE (0.08 mm) 3.25 mils white LDPE (0.08 mm) 1.0 mil EAA (0.025 mm) 1.0 mil EAA (0.025 mm) 0.25 mil foil (0.006 mm) 0.25 mil foil (0.006 mm) 2.0 mils EAA (0.051 mm) Primer 1.2 mils LDPE (0.030 mm) 0.5 mil EAA (0.013 mm)1O 0 mils Total (0.25 inner 2.0 mils LLDPE (0.051 mm) 10.0 mils Total (0.25 mm) Comp. Ex. A Comp. Ex. B 2.5 mils LDPE (0.064 mm) 2.5 mils LDPE (0.064 mm) 0.5 mils LDPE (0.013 mm) 1.25 mils LDPE (0.032 mm) 3.25 mils white LDPE (0.08 sn) 2.0 mils PP* (0.051 mm) 1.0 mil EAA (0.025 mm) 1.5 mil white EAA (0.038 mm) 0.25 mil foil (0.006 mm) 0.25 mil foil (0.006 mm) Primer Primer 0.5 mil EAA (0.013 mm) 0.5 mil EAA (0.013 mm) 2.0 mils LLDPE (0.051 mm) 2.0 mils LLDPE (O.Q51 mm) 100 mils Total (0.25 mm) 10.0 mils Total (0.025 mm) * Uniaxially oriented layer TABLE I (Continued) Comp. Ex. C 1*5 mils LDPE (0.038 mm) Ink 2.0 mils white LDPE (0.051 mm) 1.6 mils paper (0.041 mm) 0.7 mil LDPE (0.018 mm) 3.3 mils EAA (0.084 mm) 0.7 mil foil (0.018 mm) 2.0 mils EAA (0.051 mm) 1.2 mils LDPE (0.030 mm) 13.0 mils Total (0.33 mm) Portions of the sheet structures of EXAMPLES 1, 2 and 3 and comaprative Example A, B and C were made into dispensing tubes in known manner. That is, tubes were formed by forming a longitudinal lap seam by heat sealing techniques to form tubes 1-11/32 inches (34 mm) in diameter. The tubes were then cut to length and heads were injection molded into one end, including the use of conventional inserts, and capped. The tubes were filled with product and the ends sealed. The filled tubes were then subjected to testing to demonstrate their desired properties. Drop Tests In a head drop test performed with tubes filled with -toothpaste, a tube was dropped on its capped head from a height of 4 feet (1*22 m) onto a hard surface. The same tube was repeatedly dropped until it failed, with a maximum of 11 drops per tube, 3 tubes per variable. In evaluating the tubes according to the drop tests, each drop was counted as one point, and the points for each EXAMPLE were averaged to obtain a representative scoring for each EXAMPLE. Table 2 shows that tubes made with sheet structures of this invention are physically as strong as tubes from the sheets of Comparative Examples A and B, and much stronger than tubes from the thicker sheet of Comparative Example C. Deadfold Tests In the use of tubed product such as from a tube of toothpaste, it is desirable to be able to flatten the tube as the product is used, making subsequent dispensing easier. Thus the deadfold characteristics of a tube sheet structure material predict the ability of that tube to stay flat. The stay flat characteristic is specifically important when testing the fold on the side of the sheet structure that simulates the fold when a tube is flattened; namely folding onto itself that surface that would form the inside of the tube, such as layer 32 in FIGURE 1. In performing the deadfold test a metal weight is used to establish the fold. The metal weight is a rectangular rod 1 inch (2.54 cm) square and 15 inches to8 1 cm) long, weighing 4 pounds (1.8 kg). Each test specimen of the sheet structure is 4 inches (10.1 cm) long and I inch (2.54 cm) wide. The strip is placed on a flat surface and bent over across its width without creasing it. The weight is then placed squarely and gently across the bent strip so that it folds it down flat and remains squarely on the folded strip. After 30 seconds the weight is removed and the sample is tipped on edge. 30 seconds after the weight is removed a protractor is used to read the angle formed by the crease, and the result is reported as an angle Table 2 shows that deadfold retention for structures of this invention is better than deadfold retention of Comparative Examples A and B and, in the case of EXAMPLE 1 is nearly as good as Comparative Example C. TABLE 2 Caliper Drop Deadfold Example (mils) Strength Retention 1 10*0 (0.25 mm) 11 230 2 10.0 (0.25 mm) 10 540 3 10.0 (0.25 mm) 9 340 Comp A lo.0 (0.25 mm) 11 1040 Comp B 10.0 (0.25 mm) 8 760 Comp C 13.0 (033 mm) 1 220 To put the data into perspective, some basic overall comparisons need to be pointed out. The commercial structure of comparative Example C has good deadfold, poor drop strength, and is 30% thicker than the other examples, and is costlier. Comparative Examples A and B have good drop strengths and are comparatively less expensive, but have poor deadfold retention. The examples of the invention have good drop strength, are relatively inexpensive, and approach the commercial structure in deadfold characteristics As indicated hereinabove the strength and deadfold characteristics of the sheet structure materials of this invention are believed to be attributable to the uniaxial orientation of the PP layer in combination with its proper positioning in the structure. Thus it is anticipated that similar results will be obtained with similar structures wherein only the PP layer is oriented or wherein the PP and the LDPE layer such as at 12 in FIGURE 1 are oriented Those skilled in the art will see certain polymer substitutions which may be made without detracting from the overall performance of the sheet structure, depending on the intended use. The two outer layers of the structure, for example, may be made of other heat sealable polymers, so long as they are compatible for heat sealing purposes. Depending on the polymer selected for the outer layer 12, an alternate adhesive polymer may be selected for layer 14. Also, higher density polyethylene, or ethylene copolymers may, in some cases, be advantageously used instead of LDPE in the interior layers of the sheet structure, e.g. for layers 20 and 22. Likewise, any graphics, or other ink printing, could be done at an alternative layer surface to that shown in Fig. 2. Certain of the layers in the inventive structures herein are described as being uniaxially oriented. It has been discovered that the preferred direction of orientation is in the with-machine direction.

Claims: Claims: 1. A multiple layer sheet structure having two exterior surface layers and a plurality of interior layers, characterised by comprising, in order: (a) a first heat sealable layer (32, 132, 232) at a first one of said exterior surfaces; (b) a first adhesive layer (30, 130, 230) of ethylene acrylic acid copolymer; (c) a metal foil layer (26, 126, 226); (d) a second adhesive layer (24, 124, 224) of ethylene acrylic acid copolymer; (e) a first layer (22, 122, 222) of polyethylene or an ethylene copolymer; (f) a second layer (20, 120, 220) of polyethylene or an ethylene copolymer; (g) a primer layer (18, 118, 218); (h) a layer (16, 116, 216) of uniaxially oriented polypropylene, the orientation ratio being from 3/1 to 4/1; (i) a third adhesive layer (14, 114, 214); and (j) a second heat sealable layer (12, 112, 212) at the second one of said exterior surfaces, the layer (16, li6, 216) of uniaxially oriented polypropylene being within i*5 mils (0.038 mm) of the said second exterior surface. 2. A structure according to claim I, characterised in that the second heat sealable layer (12, 112, 212) is uniaxially oriented. 3. A structure according to claim 1, characterised in that the second heat sealable layer (12, 112, 212), said third adhesive layer (14, 114, 214) and said polypropylene layer (16, 116,216) are produced by coextrusion as a three layer film and are uniaxially oriented simultaneously as a three layer film, the orientation ratio being from 3/1 to 4/1. 4. A structure according to claim 1, 2 or 3, characterised by the said first and second heat sealable layers (32, 132, 232; 12, 112, 212) being compatible for heat sealing to one another. 5. A structure according to any of claims 1 to-4 including ink printing on said first primer (18, 118, 218) and between said first primer and said second layer (20, 120, 220) of polyethylene or ethylene copolymer. 6. A structure according to any of claims 1 to 5, further characterised by a second primer (28, 128) between the metal foil (26, 126) and said first adhesive layer (30, 130). 7. A structure according to any of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that the three layers comprising the second heat sealable layer, the third adhesive layer and the polypropylene layer are in toto 2.0 - 2.5 mils (0.051 - 0.064 mm) thick and said polypropylene layer is about 1.0 mil (0.025 mm) thick. 8. A structure according to any of claims 1 to 7, further characterised in that the first heat sealable layer (32, 132, 232) is linear low density polyethylene, there is a polyacrylic acid-based primer between the first adhesive layer and the metal foil, the two contiguous polyethylene layers are low density polyethylene, the said primer layer (18, 118, 218) is a polyethylene imine primer, the third adhesive layer is ethylene methyl acrylate; and the second heat sealable layer (12, 112,212) is uniaxially oriented low density polyethylene, the third adhesive layer, the polypropylene layer and the second heat sealable layer all being uniaxially stretched and the stretch ratios all being the same, from 3/1 to 4/1. 9. A structure according to any of claims 1 to 8, characterised in that the second heat sealable layer is 1t2 mils tOtO31 mm) thick, the third adhesive layer is 0.3 mil (0.008 mm) thick, and the polypropylene layer is 140 mil (0,025 mm) thick, the overall sheet structure being about 10 mils (0.25 mm) thick. 10. A structure according to any of claims 1 to 8, characterised in that the second heat sealable layer is 0.8 mil (0.02 mm) thick, the third adhesive layer is 0.2 mil (0.005 mm) thick, and the polypropylene layer is 1.0 mil (0.025 mm) thick, the overall sheet structure being about 10 mils (0.25 mm) thick. 11. A multiple-layer sheet structure for use in a heat sealed package, characterised in that the outer layers (destined to form the exterior of a package) are an outermost heat sealable layer, a polypropylene layer and an intervening adhesive layer, the polypropylene layer at least being uniaxially oriented at a stretch ratio of 3/1 to 4/1 and this layer being disposed within 1.5 mil (0.038 mm) of the exterior surface. 12. A flexible dispensing tube made of the multiple layer sheet structure according to any of the preceding claims 1 to 10, having the first and second heat sealable layers at its inside and outside surfaces and being formed into a generally cylindrical shape having a lap heat seal between the first and second heat sealable surfaces, the uniaxially oriented polypropylene being within 1.5 mils (0038 mm) of the exterior surface of the tube and the orientation direction running the length of the tube. 13. A flexible dispensing tube according to claim. 12, characterised in that the polypropylene layer is within 1 mil (0.025 mm) of the exterior surface of the tube, 14. A flexible dispensing tube according to claim 12 or claim 13, characterised in that the second heat sealable layer, the third adhesive layer and the polypropylene layer are all uniaxially oriented, their orientation ratios being 3/1 to 4/1, and the orientation direction running the length of the tube. 15. A method of making a multiple layer sheet material comprising the steps of: (a) coextruding a three layer film and uniaxially orienting it an an orientation ratio of 3/1 and 4/1 to produce an oriented film having three consecutive layers of 0.8 - 1.2 mils (0.02 - 0.03 mm) low density polyethylene, 0.2 to 0.3 mil (0.005 - 0.008 mm) ethylene methyl acrylate, and about 1.0 mil (0.025 mm) polypropylene; (b) corona treating the polypropylene surface of the oriented three layer film; (c) priming the polypropylene surface of the oriented three layer film with polyethylene imine; ; (d) extrusion laminating a previously formed low density polyethylene film, having a thickness of about 2.75 to 3.25 mils (0.07 to 0.08 mm) to said treated and primed polypropylene layer, using about 1.0 mil (0.025 mm) of low density polyethylene as the extrusion laminant; (e) extrusion laminating said 2.75 to 3.25 mil (0.07 to 0.08 mm) low density polyethylene layer to an aluminum foil layer using about 1,0 mil (0.025 mm) of ethylene acrylic acid copolymer as the extrusion laminant; and (f) coextrusion coating said foil with a coextrudate of ethylene acrylic acid copolymer and polyethylene or linear low density polyethylene, said ethylene acrylic acid copolymer being coated onto said foil; the overall thickness of said sheet material being about 10 mils (0.25 mm). 16. A method according to claim 15 and including the step of priming the foil with a polyacrylic acid chrome complex primer before coextursion coating said foil.

Inventors: REDDING, DWIGHT DENNIS
Applicants: AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY
Application year: 1984
Main classification: B32B15
IPC codes: B65D65, B32B15, B65D35, B32B27